HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 05-24 City Council Packet
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday,May 24,2010
City Hall, Council Chambers
Meeting No. 11-10
A.CALL TO ORDER
B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1.Acknowledgementof Maplewood Residents Serving the Country.
C.ROLL CALL
Mayor’s Address on Protocol:
“Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all
discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public
Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and
Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. Before addressing
the council, sign in with the City Clerk. At the podium pleasestate your name and
address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. The Mayor will thendirect staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond
to comments.”
D.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E.APPROVAL OFMINUTES
1.Approval of May 10, 2010 City Council Workshop Minutes
2.Approval of May 10, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes
F.APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
1.Presentation on Project Retrofit by Ramsey Conservation District
CONSENT AGENDA –
G.Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non-
controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests
additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held
until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a
councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item.
1.Approval Of Claims
2.Approval of Lawful Gambling Temporary Permit for White Bear Avenue Business
Association
3.Approval of 2009 Budget Adjustments for Maplewood Community Center (MCC)
4.Approval of Resolution to Waive the Statutory Tort Limits
5.Approval of Authorized Signers on City Owned Bank Accounts
6.Approval of Resolution Accepting a Donation of an Upgrade of Software for Heart
Monitor/Defibrillator for the Fire Department
7.Approval to Purchase a Used Pickup Truck for the Fire Department
8.Request Approval to Enter Into Byrne Justice Assistant Grant
9.Approval to Purchase for Testing Services for the Hills and Dales Area Street
Improvements, City Project 09-15
10.Approval to Call for NPDES Phase II Public Meeting for June 28, 2010
11.Park and Recreation Commission 2009 Annual Report
12.Resolution Approving Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota
(“PERA”) Phased Retirement Option
13.Approval of Resolution Appointing Permanent EMS Director
H.PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.Frost Avenue Bridge Replacement, City Project 10-07/Establishment of a Bridge
Replacement Program
a.Public Hearing, 7:00 p.m.
b.Resolution Establishing a Bridge Replacement Program
2.Consider Approval of Resolution to Issue Tax Exempt Bonds for Ecumen’s Purchase
of the Regent at Maplewood LLC – 7:00p.m.
I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1.Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, Project 09-15, Resolution Adopting
Revised Assessment Roll
2.Flood Plain Overlay District Ordinance and Flood Plain Rate Panel Map Amendments
– (Second Reading)
3.Flood Plain Overlay DistrictSummary Ordinance Publication Review (Super Majority
Vote Required)
4.Consider Adopting a Resolution Calling a Public Hearing to Consider a Tax Increment
Financing Housing District No. 1-10 for The Shores of Maplewood Within the
Gladstone Redevelopment Area – City Project 04-21
J.NEW BUSINESS
1.White Bear Avenue/County Road D Improvements, Project 08-13
a.Resolution of Concurrence with Ramsey County for Award of Bid
b.Approval of Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreements with Ramsey County
(White Bear Avenue at County Road D, White Bear Avenue at Woodlynn
Avenue, White Bear Avenue at Lydia Avenue, and White Bear Avenue at Beam
Avenue)
c. Approval of Cooperative Agreement (PW 2010-02) with Ramsey County
2.Ordinance Prohibiting Certain Conduct Related to Motor Vehicles
K.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L.AWARD OF BIDS
1.Award of Bid for Printing Services for the Maplewood Monthly and the Maplewood
Seasons
M.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
N.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
O.ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The
request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2001 to
make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings
– elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard
and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep
emotions in check and use respectful language.
Agenda Item E1
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:15 p.m., Monday,May 10, 2010
Council Chambers, City Hall
A.CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 5:15p.m.by Mayor Rossbach.
B. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Presentat 6:20 p.m.
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
James Llanas, Councilmember Present
John Nephew, Councilmember Present
Julie Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Wasiluk requested that the order of New Business be changed moving 2.
Organized Collection to number 3. and3. Update on Council Chambers moved to item 2.
Councilmember Llanasmoved to approve the agenda as amended.
Seconded by CouncilmemberWasiluk. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
D.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
E.NEW BUSINESS
1.Human Relations Commission Discussion
a.Labor Relations Attorney, Chuck Bethel gave the report and answered questions of
the council.
b.City Manager, James Antonen addressed and answered questions of the council.
c. City Clerk, Citizen Services Director, Karen Guilfoile addressed and answered
questions of the council.
This item will be brought back once Mr. Bethel has the opportunity to gather further information to
be discussed during another council workshop.
May 3, 2010 1
City Council Manager Workshop Minutes
Packet Page Number 3 of 275
2. 3.Update on Council Chambers Upgrades
a.IT Director, Mychal Fowlds gave areport regarding upgrades to the audio visual
needsand other proposed improvementsin the city council chambers and answered
questions of the council.
3. 2. Organized Collection Discussion
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewko gave the report on
organized collection goals and answered questions of the council.
b.Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall addressed the council and gave an update on
the organized collection systems and the process the city has gone through so far.
c. Assistant City Engineer, Steve Love addressed the counciland discussed organized
collection systems, the garbage and recycling trucks, fuel, oil, pavement, overlays,
the roadways, and litter that blows around.
d.Environmental & Natural Resource Commission member Carole Lynne addressed the
counciland shared information regarding the impacts of trash and recycling trucks
driving on the roads as well as the organized collection meeting held at the City of
Golden Valley, April 26, 2010.
e.Environmental & Natural Resource Commission member Dale Trippler addressed the
council and discussed the aspects of organized collection, spreading the word on the
positiveeffectson the environment and making the process efficient,as well as
lowering the wear and tear on the roads in Maplewood.
The council decided they would like to move forward with getting further information on organized
collection and staff will bring this back to the council.
F. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbachadjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m.
May 3, 2010 2
City Council Manager Workshop Minutes
Packet Page Number 4 of 275
Agenda Item E2
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday,May 10, 2010
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No.10-10
A.CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to order
at 7:08 p.m.by Mayor Rossbach.
Mayor Rossbach spoke of the tragic death of Sergeant Joe Bergeron and read a
Proclamation declaring the week of May 9 through May 15 as Peace Officer Memorial
Day. The city council observed oneminute of silence in honor of slain Sergeant
Bergeron.Mayor Rossbach read the proclamation for Peace Officers Memorial Day
aloud.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the proclamatio.
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS
, the Congress and President of the United Sates have designated May 15 as Peace
Officers Memorial Day and the week in which it falls as Police Week;and
WHEREAS
, the members of the Maplewood Police Department play an essential role in
safeguarding the rights and freedoms of the citizens of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS
, it is important that all citizens know and understand the problems, duties and
responsibilities of their police department and that members of our police department recognize
their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against
violence or disorder and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against
oppression or intimidation; and
WHEREAS
, the Maplewood Police Department has grown to be a modern and scientific law
enforcement agency which unceasingly provides a vital public service;
NOW, THEREFORE
, we, the City Council of Maplewood, call upon all citizens of Maplewood and
upon all patriotic, civil and educational organizations to observe the week of May 9 through 15,
2010, as Police Week, with appropriate ceremonies in which all of our people may join in
commemorating police officers, past and present, who, by their faithful and loyal devotion to their
responsibilities, have rendered a dedicated service to their communities and, in doing so, have
established for themselves an enviable and enduring reputation for preserving the rights and
security of all citizens.
WE FURTHER
call upon all citizens of Maplewood to observe May 15, 2010, as Peace Officers
Memorial Day in honor of those peace officers who, through their courageous deeds, have lost
their lives or have become disabled in the performance of duty.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
, we have hereunto set our hands and caused the Seal of the City of
Maplewood to be affixed.
Done at the City of Maplewood this date of May 10, 2010.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 5 of 275 1
City Council MeetingMinutes
_________________________________
Will Rossbach, Mayor
______________________________ _______________________________
James Llanas, Councilmember Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
______________________________ _______________________________
John Nephew, Councilmember Julie Wasiluk, Councilmember
Seconded by Councilmember Nephew. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
James Llanas, Councilmember Present
John Nephew, Councilmember Present
Julie Wasiluk, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The following items were added by councilmembers:
N1.Community Involvement – Councilmember Juenemann
N2.Report onthe Citizens Forum –Councilmember Llanas
Councilmember Nephewmoved to approve the agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.Approval of April 26, 2010, City Council Workshop Minutes
Councilmember Juenemannmoved to approvethe April 26, 2010, City Council Workshop
Minutes as approved.
Seconded by CouncilmemberLlanas. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 6 of 275 2
City Council MeetingMinutes
2.Approval of April 26, 2010, City Council Meeting Minutes
Mayor Rossbach had a correction to page 1, item E1. the motion was seconded by
Councilmember Nephewnot Juenemann.
Councilmember Nephew had the following corrections: Onpage 2, item E2. the minutes should
say as amendednot as approved.On page 12, item 4. change precedeto proceed. On page 7,
under item I1. change the second Rossbachvote to Councilmember Wasiluk.
Councilmember Nephewmoved to approvethe April 26, 2010, City Council Meeting Minutes as
amended.
Seconded by CouncilmemberLlanas. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
None.
G. CONSENT AGENDA
1.Councilmember Nephewmoved to approve items 1-4.
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes –All
The motion passed.
1.Approval of Claims
CouncilmemberNephewmoved Approval of Claims.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 519,294.83Checks # 81118thru #81173
Dated 4/19/10 thru 4/27/10
$ 322,212.68Disbursements via debits to checking account
Dated 04/16/10 thru 04/23/10
$ 429,744.60Checks #81174 thru #81241
Dated 4/28/10 thru 5/4/210
$ 151,108.79Disbursements via debits to checking account
Dated 04/23/10 thru 04/30/10
__________________
$ 1,422,360.90Total Accounts Payable
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 7 of 275 3
City Council MeetingMinutes
PAYROLL
$ 487,549.53Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 04/30/10
$ 560.00Payroll Deduction check #1008939thru #1008939
Dated 04/30/10
___________________
$ 488,109.53Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
$ 1,910,470.43
Seconded byCouncilmember Juenemann. Ayes –All
The motion passed.
2.Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements, Project 08-10, Approve Entering into
Contract for Landscaping Services for Forest Street Filtration Basin Entry
CouncilmemberNephewmoved toauthorize the city engineer to enter into a contract for services
with St. Croix Valley Landscaping for landscaping services for the Forest Street Filtration Basin
Entry for the Carsgrove Meadows Area Street Improvements Project, 08-10for $13,600.00.
Secondedby CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3.Conditional Use Permit – Xcel Energy Tanners Lake Electrical Substation Expansion, 2500
Conway Avenue (3M Center)
CouncilmemberNephewmoved toapprove the Conditional Use Permit for Xcel Energy Tanners
Lake Electrical Substation Expansion, 2500 Conway Avenue (3M Center) and review it again in
one year.
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
4.Environmental and Natural Resources Commission 2009 Annual Report
Councilmember Nephewmoved toapprove the Environmental and Natural Resources
Commission 2009 Annual Report.
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 8 of 275 4
City Council MeetingMinutes
H. PUBLIC HEARING
1.Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, Project 09-15
a.Assessment Hearing, 7:00 p.m.
b.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
c. Resolution Receiving Bids and Awarding Construction Contract
d.Enter Into Agreement With Property Owner at 2057 Duluth Street for Easement
Acquisition and Garage Replacement
i.City Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director, Michael Thompson introduced the
item.
ii.Assistant City Engineer, Steve Love gave the report and answered questions of
the council.
iii.Assistant City Manager, Public Works Director, Chuck Ahl addressed the council.
Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing.
1.Jack Hurley, Maplewood.
2.Rebecca Gurrola, Maplewood.
3.Ray Decker, Maplewood.
4.Russ Johnson, Maplewood.
5.Pat McDonough, Maplewood.
6.Roy Verden, Maplewood.
7.NickChalkline, Maplewood.
8.SteveRemick, Maplewood.
9.Bob Serreyn, Maplewood.
Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Nephewmoved toapprove the resolution adopting the assessment roll minus the
noted objections in the staff report, the additional objections that were received by staff and the
additional objections that were received during the city council meeting for the Hills and Dales
area street improvements, city project 09-15,
RESOLUTION10-05-392
ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on April 12, 2010, calling for a
Public Hearing, the assessment roll for the Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, City Project 09-15,
was presented in a Public Hearing format, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the following property owners have filed objections to their assessments according to
the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, summarized as follows:
a.Parcel 092922440077– Amy and Bryan Wallace; 1233 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs.
Wallace are requesting that the assessment be cancelled due to financial hardshipand do not
believe the street reconstruction is warranted at this time.
b.Parcel 142922440083 – Patricia A. McDonough; 1750 Howard Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Ms.
McDonough is requesting that the assessment be revised to exclude the storm sewer
assessment as she had to pay for additional storm sewer to be installed at the time her house
was constructed.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 9 of 275 5
City Council MeetingMinutes
c. Parcel 092922430024 – Michael and Sue Wilke; 1152 County Road B E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs. Wilke
are requesting that the assessment be deferred as undeveloped property and have stated that
this area is their backyard and they have no plans on developing this property.
d.Parcel 142922410059 – Perry Dotterman; 1850 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Dotterman
is requesting a disability deferral.
e.Parcel 142922410058 – Perry Dotterman; 0 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Dotterman
is requesting an undeveloped property deferral.
f.Parcel 092922440068 – Jerry and Dolores Markie; 1247 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs. Markie
are requesting a senior citizen deferral.
g.Parcel 092922440122 – George Meyer-Guthman;2171 Atlantic Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 2 units (street only). Mr. Meyer-
Guthman is requesting a revision of assessment from 2 units to 1 unit.
h.Parcel 142922410016 – Rose Povlitzki; 2233 Ripley Avenue
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs. Povlitzki
is requesting a financial hardship deferral.
i.Parcel 162922110115 – Margaret Chalkline; 2043 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs. Chalkline
is requesting a disability deferral.
j.Parcel 162922110099 – Esther Olson; 2117 Atlantic Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs. Olson is
requesting a revision of assessment.
k. Parcel 162922110053 – Michael Churchich; 1240 Belmont Lane E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Churchich
is requesting a financial hardship deferral.
l.Parcel 142922440048 – Bob Serreyn; 1695 Howard Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. Serreyn is
requesting a financial hardship deferral.
m.Parcel 162922140017 – Raymond R. Decker; 2002 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Decker is
requesting a revision of assessment.
n.Parcel 162922110075 – Connie Johnson; 2132 Atlantic Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs. Johnson
is requesting revision of assessment.
o.Parcel 092922440069 – Peggy Hartzell; 1246 E. County Road B
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mrs. Hartzell is
requesting a cancellation of assessment.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 10 of 275 6
City Council MeetingMinutes
p.Parcel 162922140024 – Sao Xiong; 1241 Ryan Avenue E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Sao Xiong is
requesting a financial hardship deferral.
q.Parcel 092922440076 – Barbara Verdon; 1237 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Ms. Verdon is
requesting a cancellation of assessment.
r.Parcel 092922440086 – Rebecca Gurrola; 2210 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mrs. Gurrola is
requesting a cancellation of assessment or a disability deferral.
s. Parcel 142922410055 – Jack Hurley; 1829 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1005 Front-Feet along Furness Street
(street only). Mr. Hurley is requesting a revision of assessment.
t.Parcel 162922140012 – Art Moore; 1232 Shryer Avenue E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Moore is
requesting a cancellation of assessment or a financial hardship deferral.
u.Parcel 162922140045 – Kenneth G. Dufner; 2017 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Dufner is
requesting a cancellation of assessment.
v.Parcel 142922440047– Phoenix Residence Inc.; 1685 Howard Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). The Phoenix
Residence Inc. is requesting a cancellation of assessment.
w.Parcel 142922410048 – Phoenix Residence Inc.; 1866 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). The Phoenix
Residence Inc. is requesting a cancellation of assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1.That the City Engineer and City Clerk are hereby instructed to review the objections received and
report to the City Council at the regular meeting on May 24, 2010, as to their recommendations
for adjustments.
2.The assessment roll for the Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements as amended, without those
property owners’ assessments that have filed objections, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, is hereby adopted. Said assessment roll shall constitute the special
assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby
found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
3.Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15
yearsfor residential properties and 8 years for commercial properties, the first installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January 2011 and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.0
percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first
installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until
December 31, 2010. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one
year on all unpaid installments.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 11 of 275 7
City Council MeetingMinutes
4.The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment
to the county auditor, but no later than October 1, 2010, pay the whole or partial (25% minimum)
of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of the payment, to the city
clerk(the city will accept no more than (2) payments), except that no interest shall be charged on
the amountpaid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time
afterOctober 1, 2010, pay to the county auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before October 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the
next succeeding year.
5.The city engineer and city clerk shall forthwith after October 1, 2010, but no later than October 15,
2010, transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the
property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
th
Adopted by the Maplewood City Councilon this 10day of May, 2010.
The motion passed.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes – All
Councilmember Nephewmoved toadopt the resolution receiving bids and awarding construction
contract to T.A. Schifsky & Sons in the amount of $5,371,115.06 for the Hills and Dales area
street improvements, city Project 09-15,
RESOLUTION10-05-393
RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that the bid of T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc.in the amount of $5,371,115.06 is the lowest
responsible bid for the construction of Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements –City Project 09-15,
and the mayor and city managerare hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said
bidder for and on behalf of the city.
AND, the finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary toimplement
the financing plan for the project as previously approved by council.
th
Adopted by the Maplewood City Councilon this 10day of May, 2010.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Mayor Rossbachmoved toapprove the agreement with the property owner at 2057 Duluth Street,
and authorize the mayor and city manager to sign the agreement with the property owner at 2057
Duluth Street.
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 12 of 275 8
City Council MeetingMinutes
2.Stormwater Ordinance Amendments (First Reading) 7:15 p.m.
a.City Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the report and
answered questions of the council.
Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing.
No one came forward to address the council.
Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Wasilukmoved toapprove the (first reading) of the stormwater ordinance
revising portions of the environmental protection and critical area (article VII) dealing with the
nationwide urban runoff program (section 12-307 (f)).
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3.Flood Plain Overlay District Ordinance and Flood Plain Rate Panel Map Amendments –
(First Reading) 7:30 p.m.
a.Environmental Planner, Shann Finwall gave the report and answered questions of the
council.
Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing.
No one came forward to address the council.
Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Nephewmoved toapprove the (first reading) of the flood plain overlay district
ordinance and flood plain rate panel map amendments.
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
The council took a 10-minute break at 8:47.
The council reconvened at 9:00 p.m.
I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
J.NEW BUSINESS
1.Consider Adoption of the Recycling Contract Request for Proposal
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewko gave the report and
answered questions of the council.
Mayor Rossbach asked if anyone wanted to speak regarding this item.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 13 of 275 9
City Council MeetingMinutes
No one came forward.
Mayor Rossbachmoved toadopt the recycling contract request for proposal. The request for
proposal outlines the city’s recycling requirements and requests that interested recycling haulers
submit a proposal for a three-year recycling contract with the city.
Seconded by CouncilmemberNephew. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
2.Frost Avenue Bridge Replacement, City Project 10-07
a.Resolution Establishing a Bridge Replacement Program and Calling Public Hearing for
May 24, 2010
b.Review Preliminary Bridge Design Concepts
i.City Engineer, Deputy Public Works Director, Michael Thompson gave the report
and answered questions of the council.
1.Michael Mireau, Community Design Review Board member addressed the council.
Councilmember Wasilukmoved toapprove the resolution calling for a public hearing for 7:00 p.m.
on Monday, May 24, 2010, for the establishment of a Bridge Replacement Program.
RESOLUTION 10-05-394
ESTABLISHING A BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AND
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood wishes to establish a Bridge Replacement Program; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a Bridge Replacement Program requires the creation of a Prioritized
Bridge Replacement List; and
WHEREAS, the creation of the Prioritized Bridge Replacement List requires a public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
th
1.A public hearing shall be held on the creation of a Prioritized Bridge Replacement List onthe 24
day of May 2010in the Council Chambers of City Hall at 7:00 p.m., and the city clerk shall give
mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3.Conditional Use Permit Revision for Feed Products North, 1300 McKnight Road North
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewko gave the report and
answered questions of the council.
1.Jeremy Yarwood. Planning Commission member addressed the council.
2.Michael Mireau, Community Design Review Board member present but didn’t address the
council.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 14 of 275 10
City Council MeetingMinutes
Councilmember Nephewmoved toapprove the resolution approving a conditional use permit
revision for the Feed Products North office building, located at 1300 McKnight Road North. This
permit allows the construction of an office building on land zoned M1 (light manufacturing) within
350 feet of residential property. Approval of this CUP revision is subject tothe following
conditions (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out):
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION10-05-395
WHEREAS, John Fallin, owner of Feed Products North, applied for a conditional use permit revision to
build an addition to an existing building on property zoned M1 (light manufacturing) located within 350
feet of residentially-zoned property.
WHEREAS, Section 44-637(b) of the city ordinances require a conditional use permit for a building in a
M1 district closer than 350 feet to residential property. The proposed building would be on alot abutting
residential property.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located east of 1300 McKnight Road N. The legal
description is:
That part of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey
County, Minnesota bounded as follows:
On the North by a line drawn parallel with and distant 95 feet Southeasterly, as measured at right angles,
from the center line of the main track of said railway company, as now located and established; on the
West by the East line of the West 66 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Said Section 24 to a point on the
West line of said Section 24 which is distant 450 feet South of the Southerly line of the 100 foot right of
way of said railway company, said Southerly line being aline drawn parallel with and 56 feet
Southeasterly as measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said railway company
as originally located and established, and on the East by the East line of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 24; excepting therefrom that part that lies Northwesterly of a line drawn
parallel with and distant 8.5 feet Southeasterly, as measured at right angles from the center line of the
most Southerly side track I.C.C. No. 114 of said railway company, as now located and established all in
the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota.
EXCEPT that part of said West Half of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 24, lying westerlyof the
centerline of the 99 foot wide road easement as described in document No. 2325930.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1.On April 6, 2010, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning
commission also considered the reports and recommendation of city staff. The planning
commission recommended that the city council approvethis permitrevision.
2. On May 10, 2010, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and
planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council passedthe above-described conditional
use permit,because:
1.The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 15 of 275 11
City Council MeetingMinutes
2.The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3.The usewould not depreciate property values.
4.The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5.The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6.The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7.The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8.The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9.The use would cause minimal adverseenvironmental effects.
10.The proposed trailer will be substantially screened from neighboring single dwellings.
Revision is subject to the following conditions: (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed
out):
1.All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city.
2.The proposed trailer must be occupied within one year of council approval or the permit
revision shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
32. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
43. A designated paved parking area shall not be required unless the site usage changes in
some fashion warranting the need for such parking spaces.Any parking spaces provided on
site shall be on a paved surface and be striped.
54. Update the alarm system at the facility, subject to the approval of the Police Chief.
65. Provide several signs along the wetland edge on the warehouse site. The number and
placement of these signs shall be determined by staff. These signs shall prohibit any
building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in or around the wetland.
76. Submit an industrial storm water protection plan to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
for their review and approval.
8. The owner or developer shall remove the trailer from the site before the city issues a building
permit for any future development.
9. The owner shall remove the trailer from the site within five years. The Council may renew
this approval if the owner requests it.
7.The office trailer must be kept in good condition and repair, including the skirting around the
base.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 16 of 275 12
City Council MeetingMinutes
The Maplewood City Council passedthis resolution on May 10, 2010.
Seconded by CouncilmemberJuenemann. Ayes – All
(Councilmember Llanas was not present when the vote was taken)
The motion passed.
4.Rezoning of the Bailey Nursery Property Located East of Sterling Street South,
Adjacent to the Cities of Woodbury and Newport from F (farm residential) to MU (mixed
use)
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewko gave the report and
answered questions of the council.
CouncilmemberNephewmoved toapprove the rezoning of the Bailey Nurseries properties
located in the southeast corner of the city from F (farm) to MU (mixed use). This rezoning is
based on Minnesota Statute 473,865 subdivision 3, which requires the city to bring the zoning of
these properties into conformance with the adopted comprehensive land use plan classification.
REZONING RESOLUTION 10-05-396
WHEREAS
,the City of Maplewood city staffproposed a change to the city's zoning map from F
(Farm) to MU (mixed use);
WHEREAS
, this zoning map change applies to the Bailey Nurseries propertieslocated in the
southeast corner of the city. The property identification numbers identifying the affected properties are:
PIN 24-28-22-41-0001; PIN 24-28-22-44-0001
WHEREAS
,On January 25, 2010, the city council adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan that
reclassified the land use plan for the above referenced properties to Mixed Use.
WHEREAS
,Section 473.865 subdivision 3 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that cities
amend their official zoning map within nine months of their adopting their revised comprehensive land
use plan to match the new land use classification.
WHEREAS
, the history ofthis change is as follows:
1.OnApril 20, 2010, theplanning commission held a public hearingto consider this rezoning.
The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements prior to their recommendation.
2.On May 10, 2010, the city council discussed the proposed zoning map change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that the city council passedthe above-described
change in the zoning map based on Minnesota Statute 473.865 subdivision 3, which requires the city to
bring the zoning of these properties intoconformance with the adopted comprehensive land use plan
classification.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 17 of 275 13
City Council MeetingMinutes
The Maplewood City Council passedthis resolution on May 10, 2010.
Seconded by CouncilmemberWasiluk. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
5.Rezoning of 1400, 1420 and 1440 SterlingStreet South from R1 (single dwelling
residential) to R-1R (rural conservation dwelling district)
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewko gave the report and
answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Nephewmoved toapprove the rezoning of 1400, 1420 and 1440 Sterling Street
south, from R1 (single-dwelling residential) to R-1R (rural conservation dwelling residence). This
rezoning is based on Minnesota Statute 473.865 subdivision 3, which requires the city to bring
the zoning of these properties into conformance with the adopted comprehensive land use plan
classification.
REZONING RESOLUTION 10-05-397
WHEREAS
,the City of Maplewood city staffproposed a change to the city's zoning map from R1
(single dwelling) to R-1R (rural conservation dwelling residence);
WHEREAS
, this zoning map change applies to 1400, 1420, and 1440Sterling Street South. The
property identification numbers identifying the affected properties are:
PIN
24-28-22-13-0007; PIN 24-28-22-13-0005; PIN 24-28-22-13-0006
WHEREAS
,On January 25, 2010, the city council adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan that
reclassified the land use plan for the above referenced properties to Rural Low Density
Residential.
WHEREAS
,Section 473.865 subdivision 3 of the Minnesota State Statutes requires that cities
amend their official zoning map within nine months of their adopting their revised comprehensive
land use plan to match the new land use classification.
WHEREAS
, the history of this change is as follows:
1.OnApril 20,2010, theplanning commission held a public hearingto consider this rezoning.
The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements prior to their recommendation.
2.On May 10, 2010, the city council discussed the proposed zoning map change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that the city council passedthe above-described
change in the zoning map based on Minnesota Statute 473.865 subdivision 3, which requires the
city to bring the zoning of these properties into conformance with the adopted comprehensive
land use plan classification.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 18 of 275 14
City Council MeetingMinutes
The Maplewood City Council passedthis resolution on May 10, 2010.
Seconded by CouncilmemberLlanas. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
6.Rezoning the Two Large Lots Lying Between Carver Avenue and Fish Creek, West of I-
494 From F (farm residential) to R-1R (rural conservation dwelling district)
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewkogave the report and
answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Wasilukmoved toapprove the rezoning of the two large lots lying between
Carver Avenue and Fish Creek, west of I-494 from F (farm residential) to R-1R (rural
conservation dwelling residence). This rezoning is based on Minnesota Statute 473.865
subdivision 3, which requires the city to bring the zoning of these properties into conformance
with the adopted comprehensive land use plan classification.
REZONING RESOLUTION 10-05-398
WHEREAS
,the City of Maplewood city staffproposed a change to the city's zoning map from F
(Farm) to R-1R (rural conservation dwelling residence);
WHEREAS
, this zoning map change applies to the two large lots lying between Carver Avenue
and Fish Creek, west of I-494. The property identification numbers identifying the affected
properties are:
PIN 24-28-22-24-0010; PIN 24-28-22-31-0017
WHEREAS
,On January 25, 2010, the city council adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan that
reclassified the land use plan for the above referenced properties to Rural Low Density
Residential.
WHEREAS
,Section 473.865 subdivision 3 of the MinnesotaState Statutes requires that cities
amend their official zoning map within nine months of their adopting their revised comprehensive
land use plan to match the new land use classification.
WHEREAS
, the history of this change is as follows:
1.OnApril 20, 2010, theplanning commission held a public hearingto consider this
rezoning. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements prior to their
recommendation.
2.On May 10, 2010, the city council discussed the proposed zoning map change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that the city council passedthe above-described
change in the zoning map based on Minnesota Statute 473.865 subdivision 3, which requires the
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 19 of 275 15
City Council MeetingMinutes
city to bring the zoning of these properties into conformance with the adopted comprehensive
land use plan classification.
The Maplewood City Council passedthis resolution on May 10, 2010.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
7.Rezoning of the Lots Fronting On Dorland Road, Heights Avenue and Overlook Circle
from R1(single dwelling residential) to RE30 (residential estate 30)
a.Community Development and Park Director, DuWayne Konewko gave the report and
answered questions of the council.
1.Jeremy Yarwood, Planning Commission member addressed the council.
table
Mayor Rossbachmoved to the rezoning of the single family dwellings fronting Dorland road,
for
Heights Avenue and Overlook Circle from R1 (single dwelling) to RE30 (residential estate 30)
additional review by the planning commission and return this to the councilat the first
meeting in June 2010.
Seconded by CouncilmemberNephew. Ayes – All
table
The motion to passed.
8.Consider Approval to Extend Lease Agreement With Gethsemane Church
a.Community Development and Parks Director gave the report and answered questions of
the council.
1.Bruce Roman, Park & Recreation Commissionmember addressed the council.
2.Peter Fisher, Park & Recreation Commissionmember addressed the council.
CouncilmemberNephewmoved to authorize staff to extend the lease of a term for 4 months
rather than the year lease and to direct staff to enter into negotiations for a definitive purchase
with Gethsemane Church of at least two acres as a way of ending the lease.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
K.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1.Mark Jenkins, Business and Economic Development Commission (BEDC) Chair,addressed
the council. Mr. Jenkins sharedhis condolences for the loss of Sergeant Joe Bergeron, to his
family and his public safety family. Mr. Jenkins said Maplewood police, fire, and the public
safety are here to protect Maplewood businesses, residents, and the visitors to our
community and the surrounding area to make it asafe placefor everyoneand stated that they
do a wonderful job.
2.Roger Logan, Owner of Keller Lake Convenience Store, Maplewood addressed the council.
Mr. Logan offered his condolences for the loss of SergeantJoeBergeronas well. Mr. Logan
discussed thetobacco and alcohol violation fines from the April city council meeting and his
disapproval for the charges.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 20 of 275 16
City Council MeetingMinutes
(City Clerk, Karen Guilfoile updated the city council on Mr. Logan’s violations at Keller Lake
Convenience Store).City Attorney Kantrud said he would work with Mr. Logan regardingthe
situation at hand.
L.AWARD OF BIDS
None.
M.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None.
N.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Community Involvement
1.- Councilmember Juenemann thanked everyone for their
community involvement, hard work and support in the services for SergeantBergeron.
Citizens Forum
2.– Councilmember Llanas said the Citizens Forum from Saturday,May 1,
2010, ismoved to June 5, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. at 2001 McMenemy Street at Fire station3
where the Fire Department will be showcased.
O.ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbachadjourned the meeting at10:53p.m.
May 10, 2010 Packet Page Number 21 of 275 17
City Council MeetingMinutes
Agenda Item F1
AGENDA REPORT
TO
: City Manager, Jim Antonen
FROM:
Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
SUBJECT:Presentation by Ramsey County Conservation District
DATE:May 18, 2010
INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
At the request of Ramsey County Conservation District Board Supervisor Margaret Ann Sletten-
Behrens, a presentation will be given to the City Council on Project Retrofit by Conservation District
Manager Tom Peterson.
Action Required
There is no action required by the City Council. This is an educational presentation on joint projects
and services available from the Conservation District, similar to the recent presentation provided by
the Ramsey – Washington Metro Watershed District.
No action is required by the City Council.
Packet Page Number 22 of 275
G-1
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Packet Page Number 23 of 275
P:\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2010\AprClms 5-07-10 and 5-14-101.xlsx
Check Register
City of Maplewood
05/07/2010
CheckDateVendorDescriptionAmount
8124205/03/201004476GAIL BERGERONADVANCE ON SEVERANCE PAY10,000.00
8124305/07/201002464US BANKFUNDS FOR ATM8,000.00
8124405/11/201003576EUREKA RECYCLINGRECYCLING CHARGES - APRIL28,449.15
8124505/11/201000585GOPHER STATE ONE-CALLNET BILLABLE TICKETS - APRIL947.00
8124605/11/201001360REINHART FOODSERVICEMDSE FOR RESALE313.57
8124705/11/201001798YOCUM OIL CO.DIESEL FUEL - APRIL7,149.00
8124805/11/201004480ANTONIO AGUIRRETHEATER TECH FOR MCC 4/2450.00
8124905/11/201002411ALEX AIR APPARATUS INCSCBA GAUGE37.41
8125005/11/201003877ASSOC OF RECYCLING MANAGERSREGISTRATION FEE15.00
8125105/11/201004457SOHAM BANERJISECOND HALF OF STIPEND FOR SPRING300.00
8125205/11/201000157BARR ENGINEERING COPROJ 09-15 ENGINEERING FEES1,028.00
8125305/11/201000223BRODIN STUDIOS, INC.RETIREMENT PLAQUE (STEFFEN)280.00
8125405/11/201004481JAMES B. CALKINSSPEAKER FOR WORKSHOP NC 4/24200.00
8125505/11/201000261CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOODREFUND MAPLEWOOD MONTHLY AD100.00
8125605/11/201002679CENTURY FENCE COINSTALL NETTING TRASH AREA GATES3,013.00
05/11/201002679CENTURY FENCE COREPLACE WOODEN GATE AT TRASH ENCL1,480.00
8125705/11/201000399DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTSPAINT FOR MESSAGE PAINTING & STRIPIN1,730.52
8125805/11/201004477GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING, INC.ESCROW RELEASE 1901 DESOTO1,626.03
8125905/11/201002407H & B SPECIALIZED PRODUCTSREPAIR CENTER ROLL-UP CURTAIN MCC1,196.00
8126005/11/201003968HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INCTRAFFIC CONES1,001.15
8126105/11/201004479HOSCH APPRAISAL & CONSULTINGREVIEW MARKET VALUE OF REAL ESTATE2,000.00
8126205/11/201004306INSTANT WHIP-MINNEAPOLIS, INC.MDSE FOR RESALE196.20
8126305/11/201004239L3 MOBILE-VISION, INC.MVD-FB2DVS-INTR, INTERVIEW ROOM DVR1,068.75
8126405/11/201004266COLLEEN LAYMANREIMB FOR MILEAGE 4/2110.60
8126505/11/201000857LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIESDIRECTORY OF MN CITY OFFICIALS53.02
8126605/11/201004377MEDIA SAVANT COMMUNICATIONSPUBLIC RELATIONS WORK MCC 5/7 CONCE350.00
8126705/11/201004148MINNESOTA REVENUEMPCA HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE252.00
8126805/11/201001085MN LIFE INSURANCEMONTHLY PREMIUM - MAY3,874.05
8126905/11/201001202NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INCMAPLEWOOD MONTHLY - MAY6,128.00
8127005/11/201004280ONE SOURCE FITNESS, L.L.C.EXERCISE EQUIPMENT MCC9,158.12
05/11/201004280ONE SOURCE FITNESS, L.L.C.REPAIR OF EXERCISE EQUIP AT MCC1,565.72
8127105/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND A MCGILL OVERPD AMB 05004285150.00
8127205/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND A MANOS HP BENEFIT80.00
8127305/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND REIMERS BCBS BENEFIT80.00
8127405/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND T HARTFIEL MEDICA BENEFIT60.00
8127505/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND S BONNIE MCC CONCERT47.55
8127605/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND J BOYD BCBS BENEFIT40.00
8127705/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND J FOSTER BCBS BENEFIT20.00
8127805/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND C JACOBSON HP BENEFIT20.00
8127905/11/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND FINANDER NC CLASS10.00
8128005/11/201001254PEPSI-COLA COMPANYMDSE FOR RESALE500.55
8128105/11/201001284POSTMASTERMAILING CITY NEWS - JUNE4,500.00
8128205/11/201001345RAMSEY COUNTYREGISTRAR NOTARY200.00
8128305/11/201004221RANDY'S MEATS & GOOD STUFFMDSE FOR RESALE194.05
8128405/11/201001340REGIONS HOSPITALMEDICAL SUPPLIES555.58
8128505/11/201003446RICK JOHNSON DEER & BEAVER INCDEER REMOVAL - APRIL300.00
8128605/11/201004478SAFELITE FULFILLMENT, INC.WINDSHIELD REPAIR M764.95
8128705/11/201001418SAM'S CLUB DIRECTDAY CARE SUPPLIES10.94
8128805/11/201004043SCHWAN FOOD COMDSE FOR RESALE52.95
05/11/201004043SCHWAN FOOD COMDSE FOR RESALE30.97
8128905/11/201000198ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVSWATER UTILITY975.01
8129005/11/201001550SUMMIT INSPECTIONSELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS - APRIL2,306.40
8129105/11/201001635TOWER ASPHALT INCPROJ 09-13 HOLLOWAY PARTPMT#295,965.01
8129205/11/201000529UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COLTD PLAN 4043120-2 - MAY2,824.46
05/11/2010UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
00529STD PLAN 4043120-1 - MAY1,920.11
8129305/11/201002464US BANKPAYING AGENT FEES425.00
Packet Page Number 24 of 275
8129405/11/201002879WASHINGTON COUNTYREGISTRAR NOTARY100.00
8129505/11/201004199YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU, INC.YOUTH REFERRAL SRVS - 2ND QTR6,250.00
209,255.82
54Checks in this report.
Packet Page Number 25 of 275
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
TransmittedSettlement
DateDatePayeeDescriptionAmount
04/30/1005/03/10MonMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)16,556.75
04/30/1005/03/10ICMA (Vantagepointe)Deferred Compensation3,244.65
04/30/1005/03/10INGDeferred Compensation24,351.15
04/30/1005/03/10MN Dept of Natural ResourcesDNR electronic licenses2,648.00
05/03/1005/04/10TuesMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)28,600.60
05/03/1005/04/10PERAPERA83,401.84
05/03/1005/04/10US TreasurerFederal Payroll Tax (FICA)97,688.88
05/03/1005/04/10US Bank VISA One Card*Credit Card Billing Fee1,461.80
05/04/1005/05/10WedMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)8,895.68
05/04/1005/05/10MN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)22,534.86
05/04/1005/05/10Labor UnionsUnion Dues5,506.56
05/04/1005/05/10HRA - AULHRA Flex plan2,933.33
05/04/1005/05/10MN State TreasurerState Payroll Tax20,867.90
05/05/1005/06/10ThursMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)18,144.21
05/06/1005/07/10FriMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)19,423.06
TOTAL356,259.27
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
Packet Page Number 26 of 275
Check Register
City of Maplewood
05/14/2010
CheckDateVendorDescriptionAmount
8129605/13/201000001ONE TIME VENDORC MUELLNER PAYROLL CHECK199.97
8129705/13/201000902M E M AREGISTRATION FEES80.00
8129805/14/201002464US BANKFUNDS FOR ATMS12,000.00
8129905/18/201001973ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS INCPOLICE DEPT CAR WASHES - APRIL116.00
8130005/18/201000908M R P APROGRAM REGISTRATION FEE500.00
8130105/18/201000025ABLE FENCE INCREMOVE & INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE17,400.00
8130205/18/201000111ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICESBOARDING & DESTRUCTION FEES1,304.80
8130305/18/201004136AZURE PROPERTIESREFUND THE DIVE NIGHTCLUB OVERPMT75.00
05/18/201004136AZURE PROPERTIESREFUND -ED GAMES DUP PMT 093052.00
8130405/18/201004001NEIL BRENEMANREIMB CATERING DEPOSIT CANCELLED100.00
8130505/18/201000240C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICESAPPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS60.00
8130605/18/201003109CLIA LABORATORY PROGRAMLAB CERTIFICATION150.00
8130705/18/201000349CUB FOODS-MAPLEWOOD EASTREFUND DUP PMT ACCT 0144500.00
8130805/18/201002750RICHARD DAWSONREIMB FOR UNIFORM SHOES 5/539.99
8130905/18/201000420DOWNTOWNER DETAIL CENTERPOLICE VEHICLE CLEANING & DETAILING129.14
8131005/18/201004374EMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLCAMBUTRAK LICENSE FEE180.00
8131105/18/201004344IMAGEWERKSCOMM CENTER BLAST POSTCARDS79.55
8131205/18/201003808ALAN H. KANTRUDREIMB PHONE - FEB100.82
05/18/201003808ALAN H. KANTRUDREIMB PHONE - MARCH100.82
8131305/18/201004491KNAAK & KRYZER, P.A.SRVS RENDERED 10/26/08-10/25/093,000.00
8131405/18/201000857LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIESDIRECTORY OF MN CITY OFFICIALS100.16
8131505/18/201000891M A M ALEGISLATIVE UPDATE 4/820.00
8131605/18/201002823JERROLD MARTINREIMB FOR HOLSTER 4/2791.95
8131705/18/201003369MOUNDS PARK ACADEMYREFUND OVERPMT FALSE ALARM25.00
8131805/18/201002175AMY NIVENREIMB TREE INSP CERT WORKSHOP85.00
8131905/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND POND VIEW APT DUP PMT 0610200.00
8132005/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND RASSETT HP BENEFIT160.00
8132105/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND THOMAS HP BENEFIT160.00
8132205/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND MN WINDOW & SIDING DUP PMT115.50
8132305/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND J STEPHEN SOCCER105.00
8132405/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND B LINNE HP BENEFIT80.00
8132505/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND J SCHUH UCARE BENEFIT80.00
8132605/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND R CZEEK HP BENEFIT60.00
8132705/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND R GODFREY HP BENEFIT60.00
8132805/18/201000001ONE TIME VENDORREFUND GANDER MT DUP PMT 022340.00
8132905/18/201004184MICHELLE PRONSATIZUMBA INSTRUCTOR - APRIL236.00
8133005/18/201001345RAMSEY COUNTY2008 TIF ADMIN FEES2,700.69
8133105/18/201004054STEVEN REEDDJ SERVICES DADDY-DAUGHTER DANCE175.00
8133205/18/201001397RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING CO.REBUILD IRRIGATION SYSTEM AFTON920.00
05/18/201001397RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING CO.REBUILD IRRIGATION SYSTEM EDGERTON920.00
05/18/201001397RYAN PLUMBING & HEATING CO.REBUILD IRRIGATION SYS KENNARD815.00
8133305/18/201001574T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INCBITUMINOUS MATERIALS - STREET2,274.95
8133405/18/201004192TRANS-MEDICEMS BILLING - APRIL3,225.00
8133505/18/201001026DEPT OF TRANSPORTATIONREFUND FALSE ALARM ACCT 053525.00
8133605/18/201004357UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SRVS, INC.EQUIP MAINT1,065.00
05/18/201004357UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SRVS, INC.EQUIP MAINT265.50
05/18/201004357UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SRVS, INC.EQUIP MAINT198.00
8133705/18/201002464US BANKPAYING AGENT FEES431.25
05/18/201002464US BANKPAYING AGENT FEES431.25
05/18/201002464US BANKPAYING AGENT FEES425.00
05/18/201002464US BANKPAYING AGENT FEES215.63
8133805/18/201001750THE WATSON CO INCMDSE FOR RESALE348.44
05/18/201001750THE WATSON CO INCMDSE FOR RESALE227.39
52,449.80
43Checks in this report.
Packet Page Number 27 of 275
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
TransmittedSettlement
DateDatePayeeDescriptionAmount
05/07/1005/10/10MonMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)7,865.38
05/07/1005/10/10MN Dept of Natural ResourcesDNR electronic licenses1,961.84
05/07/1005/10/10ARC AdministrationDCRP & Flex plan payments3,702.86
05/10/1005/11/10TuesMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)15,549.75
05/10/1005/11/10MN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)6,302.50
05/11/1005/12/10WedMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)16,435.88
05/12/1005/13/10ThursMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)14,435.88
05/12/1005/13/10US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing Card Items65,528.84
05/13/1005/14/10FriMN State TreasurerDrivers License/Deputy Registrar(city clrk)18,623.00
TOTAL150,405.93
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
Packet Page Number 28 of 275
Packet Page Number 29 of 275
Packet Page Number 30 of 275
Packet Page Number 31 of 275
Packet Page Number 32 of 275
Packet Page Number 33 of 275
Packet Page Number 34 of 275
Transaction DatePosting DateMerchant NameTransaction AmountName
04/29/201005/03/2010SHARROW LIFTING PRODUCTS$385.26 DAVE ADAMS
04/23/201004/26/2010BOARD OF AELSLAGID$135.50 R CHARLES AHL
04/23/201004/27/2010GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS$162.68 R CHARLES AHL
04/24/201004/26/2010U OF M CCE$205.00 R CHARLES AHL
05/03/201005/05/2010GRAND VIEW LODGE & TENNIS$187.89 JAMES ANTONEN
04/24/201004/26/2010TCT*M&N INTERNATIONAL$65.27 MANDY ANZALDI
04/28/201004/29/2010TARGET 00011858$16.79 MANDY ANZALDI
04/28/201004/29/2010RAGSTOCK #27$182.91 MANDY ANZALDI
04/28/201004/30/2010DEB SHOPS 67560$5.00 MANDY ANZALDI
04/30/201005/03/2010JOANN ETC #1970$13.29 MANDY ANZALDI
05/01/201005/03/2010TARGET 00011858$34.79 MANDY ANZALDI
05/02/201005/03/2010MENARDS 3059$2.12 MANDY ANZALDI
05/03/201005/04/2010TARGET 00011858($3.57)MANDY ANZALDI
05/03/201005/04/2010TARGET 00011858($12.15)MANDY ANZALDI
05/03/201005/04/2010TARGET 00011858$8.87 MANDY ANZALDI
05/03/201005/04/2010CUB FOODS, INC.$31.13 MANDY ANZALDI
05/04/201005/05/2010TARGET 00011858$34.03 MANDY ANZALDI
05/04/201005/06/2010MICHAELS #2744$23.55 MANDY ANZALDI
04/22/201004/26/2010ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC$150.46 JIM BEHAN
04/23/201004/26/2010CONTINENTAL RESEARCH$260.72 JIM BEHAN
04/26/201004/27/2010HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE$13.25 JIM BEHAN
04/26/201004/27/2010GOPHER BEARING COMPANY$47.90 JIM BEHAN
04/26/201004/27/2010GOPHER BEARING COMPANY$52.95 JIM BEHAN
04/28/201004/29/2010HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE$13.78 JIM BEHAN
04/28/201004/30/2010VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLE$460.00 JIM BEHAN
04/29/201004/30/2010POOLSIDE$24.10 JIM BEHAN
04/29/201004/30/2010AQUA LOGICS INC$913.03 JIM BEHAN
04/29/201004/30/2010AQUA LOGICS INC$1,626.54 JIM BEHAN
04/29/201005/03/2010PIPELINE SUPPLY INC$166.66 JIM BEHAN
04/30/201005/03/2010MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER$1,728.05 JIM BEHAN
04/30/201005/03/2010MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC$328.50 JIM BEHAN
05/01/201005/03/2010THE TRANE COMPANY$285.50 JIM BEHAN
05/03/201005/04/2010SIMPLEX GRINNELL WEB P$640.61 JIM BEHAN
05/03/201005/05/2010STATE SUPPLY COMPANY$179.09 JIM BEHAN
05/06/201005/07/2010AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS$14.90 CHAD BERGO
05/04/201005/05/2010KNOWLAN'S MARKET #2$11.07 OAKLEY BIESANZ
04/24/201004/26/2010FRATTALLONES WOODBURY ACE$16.05 RON BOURQUIN
05/05/201005/07/2010AUTOZONE #3082$53.48 RON BOURQUIN
04/27/201004/29/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$17.11 JASON BRASH
04/23/201004/26/2010VITAMIN WORLD 9109$186.33 NEIL BRENEMAN
04/26/201004/28/2010DISPLAYS 2 GO$73.14 NEIL BRENEMAN
05/03/201005/04/2010ARAMARK MINNEAPOLIS OCS$721.01 NEIL BRENEMAN
05/06/201005/07/2010TARGET 00011858$81.19 NEIL BRENEMAN
04/22/201004/26/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$6.33 TROY BRINK
05/05/201005/06/2010UNITED RENTALS$132.88 TROY BRINK
05/05/201005/06/2010MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L$15.00 TROY BRINK
05/05/201005/06/2010MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L$1.07 TROY BRINK
04/23/201004/26/2010OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER$196.75 BRENT BUCKLEY
04/23/201004/26/2010SHRED-IT$66.50 SARAH BURLINGAME
04/27/201004/29/2010OFFICE DEPOT #1090$54.02 SARAH BURLINGAME
04/30/201005/03/2010GE CAPITAL$43.92 SARAH BURLINGAME
04/24/201004/26/2010SUPERAMERICA 04022$21.41 DAN BUSACK
04/26/201004/28/2010BROWNELLS INC$103.67 DAN BUSACK
05/03/201005/05/2010OFFICE MAX$205.66 HEIDI CAREY
05/03/201005/05/2010OFFICE MAX$70.67 HEIDI CAREY
05/03/201005/05/2010OFFICE MAX$104.76 HEIDI CAREY
05/06/201005/07/2010VZWRLSS*APOCC VISN$99.45 HEIDI CAREY
05/04/201005/05/2010VIKING ELEC-CREDIT DEPT.$473.78 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
05/04/201005/06/20101800GOFEDEX 10010007$13.13 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
04/30/201005/03/2010HEARTLAND SERVICES$489.99 KERRY CROTTY
05/03/201005/05/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC$43.00 KERRY CROTTY
05/05/201005/07/2010PIZZA H013851 48238513$76.73 KERRY CROTTY
04/30/201005/03/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$38.59 CHARLES DEAVER
04/30/201005/03/2010RYCO SUPPLY CO$231.46 CHARLES DEAVER
05/06/201005/07/2010G & K SERVICES 006$57.08 CHARLES DEAVER
04/23/201004/26/2010ABIKESTORE.COM$129.00 RICHARD DOBLAR
05/03/201005/05/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC$109.68 RICHARD DOBLAR
Packet Page Number 35 of 275
05/03/201005/05/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC$3.00 RICHARD DOBLAR
05/04/201005/05/2010OCE' USA, INC./ITASCA$257.32 JOHN DUCHARME
04/26/201004/27/2010HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE$31.19 DAVE EDSON
04/28/201004/29/2010MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L$438.87 DAVE EDSON
04/29/201004/30/2010MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L$287.10 DAVE EDSON
05/03/201005/04/2010NORTHWEST LASERS INC$493.57 ANDREW ENGSTROM
04/22/201004/26/2010OFFICE MAX$9.63 LARRY FARR
04/29/201005/03/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2810$33.42 LARRY FARR
04/29/201005/03/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2810$10.69 LARRY FARR
04/29/201005/03/2010INTERNATIONAL CHEMTEX COR$358.55 LARRY FARR
04/30/201005/03/2010EGAN COMPANY$746.00 LARRY FARR
04/30/201005/03/2010RED WING SHOE STORE$70.00 LARRY FARR
05/01/201005/03/2010MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERI$100.91 LARRY FARR
05/02/201005/04/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2810$43.12 LARRY FARR
05/03/201005/04/2010NORTHLAND MECHANICAL C$1,208.65 LARRY FARR
05/03/201005/04/2010THERMO DYNE INC$2,963.66 LARRY FARR
05/03/201005/04/2010SIMPLEX GRINNELL WEB P$535.07 LARRY FARR
05/04/201005/05/2010MENARDS 3059($32.13)LARRY FARR
05/04/201005/05/2010OVERHEAD DOOR COMP$331.45 LARRY FARR
05/04/201005/05/2010MENARDS 3059$166.50 LARRY FARR
05/04/201005/05/2010MENARDS 3059$106.00 LARRY FARR
05/04/201005/06/2010HEJNY RENTAL INC$45.88 LARRY FARR
05/05/201005/07/2010WM EZPAY$375.97 LARRY FARR
05/05/201005/07/2010WM EZPAY$777.03 LARRY FARR
05/05/201005/07/2010WM EZPAY$370.87 LARRY FARR
04/30/201005/04/2010WW GRAINGER($500.99)SHANN FINWALL
04/23/201004/26/2010SHRED-IT$18.15 KAREN FORMANEK
04/30/201005/03/2010PITNEY BOWES TELEMRKTG$357.78 KAREN FORMANEK
04/22/201004/26/2010MCLEOD USA TELECOM$1,637.28 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/26/201004/27/2010ASSET RECOVERY$49.78 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/26/201004/27/2010QWESTCOMM*TN651$66.45 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/26/201004/28/2010CRABTREE COMPANIES INC$4,990.69 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/26/201004/28/2010CUSTOMER SUPT CENTER$898.82 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/27/201004/28/2010AT&T *8310000707190$1,029.50 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/27/201004/29/2010MICROSOFT TECH SUPPORT$99.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS
05/04/201005/06/2010METRO SALES INC$2,222.60 MYCHAL FOWLDS
04/26/201004/28/2010SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP$197.88 NICK FRANZEN
05/05/201005/05/2010HP DIRECT-PUBLICSECTOR$82.49 NICK FRANZEN
04/26/201004/27/2010FORESTRY SUPPLIERS$133.20 VIRGINIA GAYNOR
04/27/201004/28/2010STILLWATER FARM STORE$53.53 VIRGINIA GAYNOR
05/04/201005/05/2010SARPINO'S PIZZERIA$40.68 VIRGINIA GAYNOR
04/22/201004/26/2010MARRIOTT INDIANAPOLIS-F/B$10.03 CLARENCE GERVAIS
04/23/201004/26/2010PEN*FDIC/FIRE ENGINEER$75.00 CLARENCE GERVAIS
04/24/201004/26/2010MARRIOTT INDIANAPOLIS DNT$1,251.90 CLARENCE GERVAIS
05/05/201005/07/2010REGAL AUTOWASH XX$19.00 CLARENCE GERVAIS
05/06/201005/07/2010CUB FOODS, INC.$11.90 CLARENCE GERVAIS
04/29/201005/03/2010OFFICE DEPOT #1090$352.43 JEAN GLASS
04/27/201004/28/2010OUT BACK NURSERY & LANDSC$603.84 JANET M GREW HAYMAN
04/23/201004/26/2010SHRED-IT$18.15 KAREN E GUILFOILE
04/28/201004/30/2010OFFICE MAX$74.94 KAREN E GUILFOILE
04/26/201004/27/2010HIRSHFIELDS ST PAUL CSC$62.11 MARK HAAG
04/26/201004/28/2010GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT$27.78 MARK HAAG
05/04/201005/05/2010BROCK WHITE ST PAUL 180$329.77 MARK HAAG
05/04/201005/05/2010MENARDS 3059$48.30 MARK HAAG
04/24/201004/26/2010COMCAST CABLE COMM$90.10 LORI HANSON
04/24/201004/26/2010NAPA AUTO PARTS 3279016$16.69 RICK HERLUND
04/24/201004/26/2010OFFICE MAX$17.13 RON HORWATH
04/27/201004/29/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$23.50 RON HORWATH
04/22/201004/26/2010HEJNY RENTAL INC$93.02 ANN E HUTCHINSON
04/29/201005/03/2010MIKES LP GAS INC$25.61 ANN E HUTCHINSON
05/01/201005/03/2010DEGE GARDEN CENTER$10.69 ANN E HUTCHINSON
05/05/201005/07/2010METRO SALES INC$685.78 ANN E HUTCHINSON
04/23/201004/26/2010DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC$325.01 DAVID JAHN
04/24/201004/26/2010DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC$433.64 DAVID JAHN
04/28/201004/29/2010DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC$157.13 DAVID JAHN
04/30/201005/03/2010DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC$84.59 DAVID JAHN
04/22/201004/26/2010DELTA AIR 0068212286954$23.00 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
04/22/201004/26/2010DELTA AIR 0068212687157$23.00 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
Packet Page Number 36 of 275
04/23/201004/26/2010PEN*FDIC/FIRE ENGINEER$75.00 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
04/24/201004/26/2010MARRIOTT INDIANAPOLIS DNT$1,251.90 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
04/27/201004/28/2010USPS 26833800033400730$5.71 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
04/29/201004/30/2010BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC$58.25 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
04/30/201005/03/2010PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS$446.60 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
05/03/201005/04/2010AMAZON.COM$177.06 BERNARD R JUNGMANN
04/23/201004/26/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$65.67 TOM KALKA
05/01/201005/03/2010CUB FOODS, INC.$10.61 TOM KALKA
05/01/201005/03/2010CUB FOODS, INC.$13.81 TOM KALKA
04/28/201004/30/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$31.94 JASON KREGER
05/03/201005/04/2010CUB FOODS, INC.$25.65 NICHOLAS KREKELER
05/03/201005/05/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC$157.47 NICHOLAS KREKELER
05/04/201005/06/2010OFFICE MAX$19.80 NICHOLAS KREKELER
04/23/201004/26/2010OFFICE DEPOT #1090$131.71 LISA KROLL
04/26/201004/27/2010CHILI'S-MAPLEWOOD$125.30 LISA KROLL
05/04/201005/05/2010REED BUS INFO ACCT REC$496.92 LISA KROLL
05/01/201005/03/2010BOARD OF AELSLAGID$135.50 STEVEN KUMMER
05/04/201005/05/2010SUPERAMERICA 04022$5.00 STEVEN KUMMER
04/23/201004/26/2010SHRED-IT$51.45 DAVID KVAM
04/27/201004/30/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED$160.78 DAVID KVAM
04/28/201004/30/2010SHRED-IT$51.45 DAVID KVAM
05/03/201005/05/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC$43.00 DAVID KVAM
05/04/201005/07/2010UNIFORMS UNLIMITED$1,119.33 DAVID KVAM
05/06/201005/07/2010SHERATON ORLANDO NORTH($243.00)DAVID KVAM
04/23/201004/26/2010EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT$998.82 STEVE LUKIN
04/23/201004/26/2010EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT$952.33 STEVE LUKIN
04/29/201004/30/2010S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS$831.00 STEVE LUKIN
04/29/201005/03/2010MIKES LP GAS INC$17.00 STEVE LUKIN
04/30/201005/03/2010METRO FIRE$900.00 STEVE LUKIN
04/30/201005/03/2010AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL$7.20 STEVE LUKIN
05/03/201005/05/2010ASPEN MILLS INC.$59.90 STEVE LUKIN
05/04/201005/05/2010BACHMAN'S INC #0004$103.90 STEVE LUKIN
05/05/201005/06/2010WM EZPAY$170.14 STEVE LUKIN
04/24/201004/26/2010DELTA AIR 0068212520230$23.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/25/201004/26/2010DELTA AIR 0068212723912$90.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/25/201004/27/2010SUBWAY 00002063$6.96 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/25/201004/27/2010WENDYS #8869 Q25$5.20 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/26/201004/28/2010TGI FRIDAY'S #817$12.77 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/27/201004/28/2010PUBLIX #442$17.25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/27/201004/29/2010SHERATON ORLANDO NRTH F&B$12.60 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/27/201004/29/2010SHERATON ORLANDO NRTH F&B$5.97 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/29/201004/30/2010BOSTON MARKET #177$12.37 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/30/201005/03/2010ELEPHANT BAR #251$20.94 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/01/201005/03/20107-ELEVEN 25608$22.11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/02/201005/03/2010LITTLE CAESARS 0001$5.35 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/02/201005/04/2010MCDONALD'S M5735 OF FL$6.40 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/03/201005/05/2010CHILI'S GRI22200002220$19.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/03/201005/05/2010SHERATON ORLANDO NRTH F&B$3.31 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/04/201005/05/2010STEAK-N-SHAKE#0424 Q99$6.60 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/04/201005/06/2010SUBWAY 00328369$7.76 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/04/201005/06/2010SHERATON ORLANDO NRTH F&B$3.31 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/05/201005/06/2010DELTA AIR 0068213500900$60.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/05/201005/07/2010OUTBACK AS4 MC10158459$13.64 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
05/05/201005/07/2010SHERATON ORLANDO NRTH F&B$16.80 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
04/22/201004/26/2010SEARS AUTO CNTR 6122$96.40 MARK MARUSKA
04/23/201004/26/2010DAVIS EQUIPMENT$317.82 MARK MARUSKA
04/23/201004/26/2010HIRSHFIELDS ST PAUL CSC$181.41 MARK MARUSKA
04/23/201004/26/2010DAVIS LOCK & SAFE$12.83 MARK MARUSKA
04/26/201004/27/2010HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE$35.83 MARK MARUSKA
04/27/201004/28/2010VALLEY CREEK EXPRESS INC$1,334.00 MARK MARUSKA
04/28/201004/29/2010HUGO'S TREE CARE$908.44 MARK MARUSKA
04/28/201004/29/2010MENARDS 3059$82.04 MARK MARUSKA
05/04/201005/05/2010HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION$1,380.00 MARK MARUSKA
05/04/201005/05/2010AMERICAN FASTENER AND SUP$20.76 MARK MARUSKA
05/06/201005/07/2010G & K SERVICES 006$521.08 MARK MARUSKA
05/04/201005/04/2010U OF M BLOSYS/AG ENG OL$25.00 BRYAN NAGEL
05/06/201005/07/2010USPS 26834500133401316$17.60 AMY NIVEN
05/06/201005/07/2010G & K SERVICES 006$1,072.02 AMY NIVEN
Packet Page Number 37 of 275
05/06/201005/07/2010G & K SERVICES 006$337.33 AMY NIVEN
05/06/201005/07/2010G & K SERVICES 006$269.74 AMY NIVEN
04/23/201004/26/2010MENARDS 3059$296.10 RICHARD NORDQUIST
05/04/201005/05/2010HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE$19.79 RICHARD NORDQUIST
04/29/201004/30/2010MINNESOTA LAW ENFORCEMENT$1,100.00 JULIE OLSON
04/29/201005/03/2010OFFICE DEPOT #1090$13.97 MARY KAY PALANK
04/30/201005/03/2010OFFICE DEPOT #1090$40.92 MARY KAY PALANK
04/26/201004/28/2010MIDWAY PARTY RENTAL$157.85 CHRISTINE PENN
05/05/201005/07/2010PIZZA H013851 48238513$94.87 CHRISTINE PENN
04/22/201004/26/2010TAYLOR & FRANCIS-CRC$68.37 PHILIP F POWELL
04/23/201004/26/2010PEAVEY CORPORATION$155.40 PHILIP F POWELL
05/02/201005/03/2010PARTSTORE QPS$30.96 PHILIP F POWELL
04/24/201004/26/2010LITTLE CAESARS 1456$87.84 WILLIAM J PRIEFER
04/30/201005/03/2010GE CAPITAL$333.16 WILLIAM J PRIEFER
05/01/201005/03/2010NORSEMAN ENVIRONMENTAL SA$54.79 WILLIAM J PRIEFER
04/23/201004/26/2010BAUER BUILT TIRE -$1,389.38 STEVEN PRIEM
04/26/201004/28/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$49.55 STEVEN PRIEM
04/26/201004/28/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$50.25 STEVEN PRIEM
04/26/201004/29/2010COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES$147.48 STEVEN PRIEM
04/27/201004/28/2010POMPS TIRE SERVICE, INC$584.90 STEVEN PRIEM
04/27/201004/28/2010MTI$296.65 STEVEN PRIEM
04/27/201004/29/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$10.17 STEVEN PRIEM
04/28/201004/29/2010FACTORY MTR PTS #1$267.69 STEVEN PRIEM
04/28/201004/30/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$28.47 STEVEN PRIEM
04/29/201004/30/2010FACTORY MTR PTS #1$18.40 STEVEN PRIEM
04/29/201004/30/2010INDUSTRIAL LADDER MINNESO$550.62 STEVEN PRIEM
04/29/201005/03/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$198.07 STEVEN PRIEM
04/29/201005/03/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$157.49 STEVEN PRIEM
04/30/201005/03/2010FACTORY MTR PTS #1($29.25)STEVEN PRIEM
04/30/201005/03/2010TRI-STATE BOBCAT INC.$32.29 STEVEN PRIEM
04/30/201005/03/2010FACTORY MOTOR PARTS #19$72.62 STEVEN PRIEM
04/30/201005/03/2010PIONEER RIM & WHEEL$192.58 STEVEN PRIEM
04/30/201005/03/2010MTI$83.45 STEVEN PRIEM
04/30/201005/03/2010E A T I$56.11 STEVEN PRIEM
05/03/201005/04/2010BAUER BUILT TIRE -$39.01 STEVEN PRIEM
05/03/201005/05/2010KATH AUTO PARTS LC($276.34)STEVEN PRIEM
05/03/201005/05/2010KATH AUTO PARTS NSP$4.17 STEVEN PRIEM
05/04/201005/05/2010E A T I$781.04 STEVEN PRIEM
05/04/201005/05/2010AMERICAN FASTENER AND SUP$151.61 STEVEN PRIEM
05/05/201005/06/2010DIESEL & IMPORTS /$350.90 STEVEN PRIEM
04/23/201004/26/2010HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS$1,032.20 MICHAEL REILLY
04/28/201004/29/2010DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC$72.85 MICHAEL REILLY
04/29/201004/30/2010DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC$239.96 MICHAEL REILLY
05/05/201005/06/2010HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS$797.29 MICHAEL REILLY
04/23/201004/26/2010TARGET 00011858$94.90 AUDRA ROBBINS
04/23/201004/26/2010MICHAELS #2744$18.73 AUDRA ROBBINS
04/23/201004/28/2010TLF*HERMES FLRL & GHSE$393.68 AUDRA ROBBINS
04/29/201004/29/2010MISTER BALLOON($101.11)AUDRA ROBBINS
05/03/201005/05/2010PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISING$57.65 AUDRA ROBBINS
05/06/201005/07/2010TARGET 00011858$53.87 AUDRA ROBBINS
05/05/201005/07/2010KATH AUTO PARTS LC$21.82 ROBERT RUNNING
05/03/201005/04/2010BACHMAN'S INC #0004$458.27 DEB SCHMIDT
04/27/201004/29/2010METROCALL/ARCH WIRE$16.07 SCOTT SCHULTZ
04/26/201004/28/2010ZIEBART MAPLEWOOD MN 47$224.44 MICHAEL SHORTREED
04/27/201004/29/2010LEEANN CHIN #026 BLOOMING$31.76 MICHAEL SHORTREED
05/04/201005/05/2010BACHMAN'S INC #0004$160.69 MICHAEL SHORTREED
04/30/201005/03/2010JAKE'S CITY GRILLE - M$60.00 ANDREA SINDT
04/22/201004/26/2010OFFICE MAX$78.66 FAITH THOMFORDE
04/28/201004/30/2010STAPLES DIRECT00209908$115.42 FAITH THOMFORDE
04/23/201004/26/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$199.96 JOE TRAN
04/27/201004/29/2010THE HOME DEPOT 2801$11.53 JOE TRAN
05/01/201005/03/2010CUB FOODS, INC.$22.17 JOE TRAN
05/03/201005/04/2010WAL-MART$2.42 SUSAN ZWIEG
05/03/201005/04/2010CUB FOODS$5.30 SUSAN ZWIEG
05/03/201005/05/2010WAL-MART #3498$26.63 SUSAN ZWIEG
TOTAL$65,528.84
Packet Page Number 38 of 275
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE: Temporary Gambling Permit for White Bear Avenue Business
Association
Introduction
RESOLUTION
Recommendation
Packet Page Number 39 of 275
Memorandum
To:
City Manager
From:
Finance Manager
Date:
May 18, 2010
Re:
Approval of 2009 Budget Adjustment for MCC
BACKGROUND
The following budget adjustment is submitted for City Council approval for the
Community Center. It is proposed as part of our routine preparation for the year end
audit.
The adjustment recognizes the efforts of our Marketing and Advertising Coordinator.
Her time was budgeted within the General Fund however a portion of her time was
actually spent with the Community Center. Her actual costs have been allocated
properly. This adjustment will allocate the budget in the same manner making budget to
actual comparisons reasonable.
Budget adjustment requested is:
Reduce General Fund budget (101-111-000-4010) $22,650
Increase Community Center budget (602-611-003-4010) $22,650
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the above budget adjustment.
Packet Page Number 40 of 275
AGENDA NO. G-4
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Finance Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution to Maintain Statutory Tort Liability Limits
DATE: May 13, 2010
BACKGROUND
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must
decide each year whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the
coverage purchased. This decision must be made by the City Council.
Attached is a schedule from the League showing the different options associated with waiving
and not waiving the statutory limits. The City has elected to not waive the statutory tort limits in
the past which would limit recovery to $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence for
the upcoming policy period.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution to not waive the monetary limits
on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
Packet Page Number 41 of 275
Packet Page Number 42 of 275
A RESOLUTION TO MAINTAIN THE
STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PROPOSED
WHEREAS,
pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust has asked the City to make an election with regards to waiving or not waiving its
tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and
WHEREAS,
the choices available are; to not waive the statutory limit, to waive the
limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, and to waive the limit and to add
insurance to a new level;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the Maplewood City Council does
hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04;
and, that such election is effective until amended by further resolution of the Maplewood City
Council.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota at a regular
meeting held May 24, 2010
ATTEST:
______________________________ __________________________________
Karen E. Guilfoile, City Clerk William Rossbach, Mayor
P:\COUNCIL FILES\RESOLUTIONS\Resolution to Maintain the Statutory Tort Limits 2010.doc
Packet Page Number 43 of 275
Agenda Item G-5
Agenda Report
To:
City Manager
From:
Finance Manager
Date:
May 13, 2010
Re:
Authorized Signers on City Owned Bank Accounts
BACKGROUND
The City designates three authorized signers on its bank depositories. Those are the
Mayor, City Manager and Finance Manager. The authorized signers apply to all city
owned bank accounts, those currently being:
US Bank, National Association
US Bank’s Treasury Management Services
Alerus Financial (fka Prosperan Bank)
Attached is the paperwork (including two resolutions) required by each depository,
establishing the signers for the above banks.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff requests approval of the resolutions and required agreements authorizing the
Mayor, City Manager and Finance Manager as signers on bank accounts.
Packet Page Number 44 of 275
DEPOSITORY SERVICES RESOLUTION FOR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
name of certifying officer
title of certifying officer
therein called the "Depositor"
RESOLVED
RESOLVED
RESOLVEDidentify
certifying officer by title
Packet Page Number 45 of 275
RESOLVED
RESOLVED
NameTitleSignature
Will Rossbach Mayor
James Antonen City Manager
Gayle Bauman Finance Manager
(Certifying Officer)(Title)
Attest by one other officerTitle
Packet Page Number 46 of 275
DEPOSITORY SERVICES RESOLUTION FOR GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES
name of certifying officer
title of certifying officer
therein called the "Depositor"
RESOLVED
RESOLVED
RESOLVEDidentify
certifying officer by title
Packet Page Number 47 of 275
RESOLVED
RESOLVED
NameTitleSignature
Will Rossbach Mayor
James Antonen City Manager
Gayle Bauman Finance Manager
(Certifying Officer)(Title)
Attest by one other officerTitle
Packet Page Number 48 of 275
U.S. Bank Treasury Management
Service Agreement
Customer Name:
Customer Address:
Organization:
Corporation PartnershipLimited Liability Company
AssociationSole Proprietorship Governmental Entity
Non-Profit Organization Other:
Tax Identification Number:
Authorized Signers
Authorized Signer (please print): Title:
Signature: Date:
Authorized Signer (please print): Title:
Signature: Date:
Authorized Signer (please print): Title:
Signature: Date:
Packet Page Number 49 of 275
TM Service Agreement Page 1 of 2 Revision Date: 11/2003
U.S. Bank Treasury Management
Service Agreement
Customer Name: Tax Identification Number:
Contract Signer (please print): Title:
Signature: Date:
Contract Signer (please print): Title:
Signature: Date:
APPROVAL BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Signature:
Printed Name:
Officer Number:
Telephone Number:
Title:
Date:
Packet Page Number 50 of 275
TM Service Agreement Page 2 of 2 Revision Date: 11/2003
5/24/2010
651-249-2902
1/25/2010
Robert Mittet
Gayle Bauman
Packet Page Number 51 of 275
Packet Page Number 52 of 275
Agenda ItemG 6
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen,City Manager
FROM:
Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
SUBJECT:Resolution Accepting ADonation to the Fire Department
DATE:
May 18, 2010
INTRODUCTION
The fire department has received a donationfrom Regions Hospital in the amount of $14,000for
the upgrade of software for our Philips MRX heart monitors/defibrillators. This upgrade is being
given to us for participating in a nationwide trial study for providing advanced care of medications
to heart patients in the field. This upgrade will provide additional data that can be used on a day-
to-day basis.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the city councilapprove to accept the donation in the amount of $14,000of
software upgrades.
Packet Page Number 53 of 275
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GIFT TO CITY
WHEREAS, Maplewood is AUTHORIZED to receive and accept grants, gifts and devices of real and
personal property and maintain the same for the benefit of the citizens and pursuant to the donor’s terms if
so-prescribed, and;
WHEREAS, Regions Hospital wishes to grant the city of Maplewood the following: $9,600, and;
WHEREAS, Regions Hospital has instructed that the City will be required to use the aforementioned for:
use by the fire departmenttoupgrade the software for the Philips MRX heart monitor/defibrillator,
and;
WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood has agreed to use the subject of this resolution for the purposes and
under the terms prescribed, and;
WHEREAS, the City agrees that it will accept the gift by a four-fifths majority of its governing body’s
membership pursuant to Minnesota Statute §465.03;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §465.03, that the Maplewood
City Council approves, receives and accepts the gift aforementioned and under such terms and conditions as
may be requested or required.
The Maplewood City Council passed this resolution by four-fifths or more majority vote of its membership
on ________________________________, 20______.
Signed: Signed: Witnessed:
________________________ _________________________ __________________________
(Signature) (Signature) (Signature)
Mayor ____Chief of Fire City Clerk__________________
(Title) (Title) (Title)
________________________ _________________________ __________________________
(Date) (Date) (Date)
Packet Page Number 54 of 275
Agenda ItemG 7
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen,City Manager
FROM:
Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
SUBJECT:
Purchase of OneUsed Vehicle
DATE:
May 18, 2010
INTRODUCTION
In the 2010budget,we have $30,000 for the replacement of onevehicle. After doing some
research, we found that we could get a used vehicle with very low mileage and in very good
condition for considerably less money than purchasing a new one. After searching the market, we
found a 2005 Ford F250 crew cab that had approximately 29,000 miles on it. This vehicle will
meet our needs as we move forward and will be replacing a 1990 Dodge pickup truck.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that the city council approve the purchase of one Ford F250 pickupin the amount of
$22,700fromSynergy Motor Car Company.
Packet Page Number 55 of 275
Packet Page Number 56 of 275
Packet Page Number 57 of 275
Packet Page Number 58 of 275
Packet Page Number 59 of 275
Packet Page Number 60 of 275
Packet Page Number 61 of 275
Agenda Item G9
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Jim Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
Steve Kummer, Civil Engineer II
SUBJECT:Approval of Purchase for Testing Services for the Hills and Dales Area
Street Improvements, City Project 09-15
DATE:
May 14, 2010
INTRODUCTION
It is necessary to utilize the services of an independent testing laboratory to assist city inspectors in
quality control on the city capital improvement project slated for 2010 construction. Since this purchase
will exceed the ordinance-allowed expenditure amount of $10,000 for the improvement project and the
purchase will be between $10,000 and $50,000, written quotations were obtained from prospective
testing firms for the required services.
DESCRIPTION
Each request for proposal included the scope of services as well as project quantities and access to
plans and specifications for the construction project. The companies involved in soliciting a price for
services provided a similar scope of testing services essential for project quality control. The City
received quotes from the following four (4) geotechnical testing firms:
Company Proposal Total
Northern Technologies, Inc. $28,069.00
Stork Twin City Testing Corporation $34,758.80
American Engineering and Testing $30,474.00
Braun Intertec $42,819.00
BUDGET IMPACT
City staff recognized that geotechnical testing services for this street improvement project would most
likely be in the $20,000 to $35,000 range and decided to get competitive quotes for the project.
Geotechnical testing costs are built into the approved budget for the project, so no additional funding
allocation is required.
RECOMMENDATION
Northern Technologies came in with the lowest bid for the Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements
project. Northern Technologies approached city staff about the possibility of providing geotechnical
services and asked city staff to solicit a bid from the company. Staff contacted several cities that have
worked with Northern Technologies in the past. All have mentioned that Northern Technologies’
services are responsive, of good quality, professional and thorough.
Packet Page Number 62 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Based on the low bid, responsible bid for services, and the reputation of the company, staff
recommends the council authorize the City Engineer to enter into a contract for services with Northern
Technologies for testing and quality control-services for the Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements,
City Project 09-15.
Attachments
1. Northern Technologies Proposal
2. Stork Twin Cities Testing Quote
3. American Engineering and Testing Quote
4. Braun Intertec Quote
Packet Page Number 63 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 64 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 65 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 66 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 67 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 68 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 69 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 70 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 71 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 72 of 275
Agenda Item G9
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 73 of 275
Agenda Item G10
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
DuWayne Konewko, Community Development and Parks Director
SUBJ: Call for NPDES Phase II Public Meeting for June 28, 2010
DATE:
May 13, 2010
INTRODUCTION
As part of Maplewood’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit, the City is required to prepare an annual report detailing the
progress made in the previous year toward satisfying the requirements of the
permit. The City is also required to hold a public meeting on the annual report to
solicit comments from the public and address all comments written and oral in
the final report submitted to the MPCA. The notice of publication has been
submitted to the Maplewood Review and the public meeting is scheduled for the
th
June 28 City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND
A 1987 amendment to the federal Clean Water Act required implementation of a
two-phase comprehensive national program to address pollution from stormwater
runoff. This program was named the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES). Since 1991, NPDES Phase I regulated cities with populations
of 100,000 or more. NPDES Phase II took effect in 2003, regulating cities with
populations of 10,000 or more. Maplewood was among a group of approximately
220 cities in Minnesota affected by NPDES Phase II.
The State of Minnesota regulates the disposal of stormwater by a State Disposal
System (SDS) permit. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
administers both NPDES and SDS permits in Minnesota and issues combined
NPDES/SDS-MS4 stormwater permits. In March 2008, the city submitted its
permit application to the MPCA. The permit cycle runs five years.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending that the City Council set the public meeting for the
NPDES permit requirement for June 28, 2010 beginning at 7:00p.m. in the
council chambers.
Packet Page Number 74 of 275
Agenda Item G11
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
Jim Taylor, Recreation Program Supervisor
Audra Robbins, Recreation Program Supervisor
DuWayne Konewko, Community Development and Parks Director
SUBJECT:Parks and Recreation Commission 2009 Annual Report
DATE:
May 17, 2010
INTRODUCTION
In compliance with Article II, Section 21.20 of the Maplewood city ordinance, the
Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission is required to submit an annual
commission report. This report serves as a means of relaying important information to
the City Council on the Commission’s accomplishments and obtaining feedback on the
proposed 2010 goals.
DISCUSSION
On March 17, 2010, the Parks and Recreation Commission adopted their 2009 Annual Report.
RECOMMENDATION
Review and adopt the attached Parks and Recreation Commission 2009 Annual Report.
Attachments
1 – Parks and Recreation Commission 2009 Annual Report
Packet Page Number 75 of 275
Attachment 1
April 15, 2010
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
In compliance with Article II, Section 21.20 of the Maplewood city ordinance, the Maplewood
Parks and Recreation Commission hereby submits its 2009 annual report and 2010 activity plan.
We reviewed the accomplishments of the past year and discussed the various programs and
activities we wish to pursue in the coming year. Our continuing goal is promoting city parks, open
space, community center, quality inclusive recreational programming and maintaining a quality
park system geared to the continually changing demographics of our community.
The year of 2009 presented the Commission a number of opportunities to start moving forward on
st
projects that were set over 10 years ago. Work commenced on the 1 stage of redeveloping Joy
Park, the start of the park redevelopment process and planning for Lions Park, finalizing the
details on the tot lot in the Legacy Development and the last parts of the Lakes Links trail being
finalized with construction underway in late fall.
During the past year we were grateful to the City for the establishment of a Park Manger position.
We look forward to the eventual restoration of a Parks Department that once again incorporates
Open Space, Trails, Community Centers and Parks lead by a professional Parks Director. The
coming year will present challenges with the retirement of two long time park leaders. A complete
summary of our 2009 goals and accomplishments are attached to this report.
2010 goals include several items from 2010 that we will continue to pursue along with several
new goals. The entire goal list is attached to this letter.
The Parks and Recreation Commission would be happy to meet with the City Council to address
any park issues.
Respectfully submitted,
Bruce Roman, Chairperson
Therese Sonneck, Vice Chair
Craig Brannon, Commissioner
Donald Christianson, Commissioner
Peter Fischer, Commissioner
Daniel Mass, Commissioner
Mary Mackey, Commissioner
Carolyn Peterson, Commissioner
Kim Schmidt, Commissioner
Packet Page Number 76 of 275
Parks and Recreation in Maplewood is a large area consisting of trails, active parks, passive
parks, open spaces, indoor parks (community centers) and greenways. In addition, it covers
recreational programming that range from active athletics, to drama on stage, to neighborhood
events that help tie our city together. The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission
provides advice and makes recommendations in all of these areas. In addition, we are charged
with the following duties:
Formulate polices for approval by the city council.
Advise the council and manager as to the minimum qualifications for the position
of Director of Parks and Recreation.
Aid in coordinating the parks and recreation services with the programs of other
governmental agencies and organizations.
Interpret polices and functions of the Parks and Recreation Department to the
public.
Make periodic inventories of recreation and park services that exist or may be
needed and interpret the needs of the public to the city council and the Director
of Parks.
Recommend for adoption, standards on land acquisition, facility development,
program and financial support.
The Following served on the Parks Commission in 2009:
Peter M. Fischer, Chairperson
Bruce Roman, Vice Chair
Donald Christianson, Commissioner
Daniel Moss, Commissioner
Craig Brannon, Commissioner
Kim Schmidt, Commissioner
Carolyn Peterson, Commissioner
Therese Sonnek, Commissioner
Mary Mackey, Commissioner
Parks and Recreation Commission Goals for 2009
1. Provide recommendations on development of park assets in the Gladstone redevelopment
This item remains on hold until redevelopment starts in the Gladstone area and
area.
will carry over to 2010.
The planning process is done and
2. Continue the park redevelopment process at Lions Park.
redevelopment will start this year.
3. To review the relationship and involvement between the Parks Commission and the
There was a meeting in the fall with the Community
Maplewood Community Center.
Center personnel. This is an incomplete goal and will carry over to 2010.
Work
4. To work with other groups and commission on the Sustainable Maplewood report.
started on this the past year with a joint meeting of the ENR Commission and the Parks
Commission. This has started a joint relationship with our two commissions on several
projects. The Fish Creek Task Force and the ENR Greenways subcommittee.
Sustainable ideas were generated and are being applied with the redevelopment of
Lions Park. The commission will continue to work on this the coming year.
The goal is done and
5. To finalize routes on the two last segments of the Lakes Links Trail.
construction was started in one segment in late summer.
The
6. Continue the park planning and naming process for the tot lot park in Legacy Village.
planning for this park was started; the naming process still needs to be followed for
this park. This will carry over to 2010.
A subcommittee made
7. Continue work on the need for a dog park in Maplewood.
recommendations to the Commission in late 2009. This work is still occurring and the
goal will carry over to 2010.
8. Finalize the recommendation on the purchase of land for Gethsemane Park and pass it forward
Packet Page Number 77 of 275
This item is on hold and will carry over to 2010.
to the City Council.
This was done the past year and
9. Involvement with the development of community gardens.
will carry over to 2010 for evaluation.
10. Review long term park funding for redevelopment and restoration of Parks, Trails and Open
The commission accomplished this and will now move on to making
Spaces.
recommendations for the coming year.
11. Receive more feedback from staff and other partner groups (Open Space Task Force,
During 2009 we were able to meet with several
Friends of Maplewood Nature, MAA, etc.)
groups. This will carry over to 2010 to continue the outreach efforts to stay in touch
with the recreational and social needs of the Community.
12. Review of Greenways for possible opportunities for parks and opens spaces, i.e. Fish Creek,
. During 2009 commissioners worked with different groups on Fish
Beaver Lake, etc
Creek Task Force and the ENR Greenway Subcommittee. This goal will continue in
2010 with looking at the Beaver Creek area and reviewing the possibilities in the Fish
Creek Greenway.
In addition to the above goals the following tasks were also undertaken during 2009.
- Reviewed implementation plans for wetland restoration in the Spoon Lake open
space and at Kohlman Park.
- Addressed herbicide treatment of Silver Lake with a requested report of effectiveness
being made in 2010.
- In April several commissioners worked with local citizens to help clean up
neighborhood parks.
- Met with the Recreation Division leaders for updates of what is happening locally.
- Reviewed and made recommendations on the 2010 – 2014 Capital Improvement
Plan.
- Reviewed and made recommendations on adding rain water gardens to Goodrich
Park.
- Several Commissioners were involved with other communities and commissions in
the Joy Park Buckthorn removal in November.
- Reviewed and started implementing staff’s Parks Assessment Report by prioritizing
projects for the coming year.
- Reviewed the needs for a Park Shelter at Wakefield Park and added it to the list of
projects for 2010.
Parks and Recreation Commission Goals for 2010
1. To define the relationship and involvement between the Parks Commission and the
Maplewood Community Center.
2. Continue work on the need for a dog park in Maplewood.
3. Make recommendations on the purchase and/or continued lease of Gethsemane Park
and forward those recommendations to the City Council.
4. Explore options on the Beaver lake property.
5. Review long term park funding for redevelopment and restoration of Parks, Trails, and
Open Spaces.
6. Evaluate Community Garden Program.
7. Establish Community park events (Cultural).
8. Explore options to improve the Legacy Sculpture Garden.
9. Improve Parks and Trails signage and maps.
10. Re-development of Goodrich Park, create master plan for 2011 re-development.
11. Develop priorities for the Open Space master plan.
12. Explore the possibility of the re-establishment of the Parks and Recreation Department.
Packet Page Number 78 of 275
Agenda Item G12
CONSENT AGENDA REPORT
TO
: City Council
FROM:
Chuck Bethel, City Attorney
SUBJECT:
Resolution approving Public Employees Retirement Association of
Minnesota (“PERA”)Phased Retirement Option
DATE:
May 17, 2010
INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
PERA has a new Phased Retirement Option (“PRO”) that cities may voluntarily choose to
implement for their employees. This option allows those employees who choose this option to
begin receiving their pension while continuing to work for the City, but they can only work up to
20 hours per week. The employee must also otherwise meet all the necessary requirements of
the PROto retire. Additionally, even when the City Council approves the use of the PRO,the
CityManagerhas the right to determine on a case-by-case basis whether toallow an employee
to take part in the PRO.If the City decides to authorize participation by an employee, then that
employee will continue to work part-time, without benefits for up to one year. At the end of that
year the employee must then resign unless the employer decides to extend it for another year.
The employer is allowed to renew it on an annual basis for up to 5 years. The PROcould be
good for the City in that it can allow the City to retain the experience and expertise of its valued
long term employees, while allowing the City to train in new replacements at a lower overall cost
to the City.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the PERA Phased Retirement Option be approved.
Packet Page Number 79 of 275
Item G13
MEMORANDUM
TO:James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:Karen Guilfoile, Director Citizen Services
DATE:May 19, 2010
SUBJECT:Approval of Resolution Appointing Permanent Emergency Management Director
Introduction
State Statute 12.25 dictates that political subdivisions must appoint a Director of Emergency
Management. The Director is responsible for organizing, administering and operating the local
emergency management organization which is subject to the direction and the control of the
localgoverning body.
After the resignation of former Emergency Management Director Larry Cude, Fire Chief, Steve
Lukin was appointed as the Interim Director.
It is recommended that the city council approve the following resolution appointing Fire Chief,
Steve Lukin as the Permanent Emergency Management Director.
Resolution Appointing a Director of Emergency Management
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statute 12.25, cities are required to establish a
local organization for emergency management and appoint a Director for the entity and,
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has established such an organization and has been
operating it with an Interim Director and,
WHERERAS, the Interim Director, Fire Chief, Steve Lukin, has been performing the role
in an exemplary manner, organizing, administering and operating the City’s Emergency
Management Organization and,
WHEREAS, it is in the City’s interest and pursuant to State law that Chief Lukin be
appointed, formally as Director of Emergency Management for the City of Maplewood.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City council of the Maplewood that Fire
Chief, Steve Lukin is hereby appointed Director of Emergency Management for the City of
Maplewood.
Packet Page Number 80 of 275
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Packet Page Number 81 of 275
Agenda Item H1
AGENDAREPORT
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
Michael Thompson, City Engineer/Deputy Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Frost Avenue Bridge Replacement, City Project 10-07/Establishment of a
Bridge Replacement Program
a. Public Hearing, 7:00 p.m.
b. Resolution Establishing a Bridge Replacement Program
DATE:
May 17, 2010
INTRODUCTION
On May 10, 2010, the Council ordered a public hearing for the establishment of a Bridge Replacement
Program. The public hearing for the establishment of a Bridge Replacement Program has been
scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, May 24, 2010. The public hearing notice was published in the
Maplewood Review on May 12 and 19, 2010.
The City is considering the replacement of the existing Frost Avenue Bridge over Phalen Creek using
State Bridge Bond Funds to help pay for a portion of the project costs. In order to request State Bridge
Bond Funds, the City must establish a Bridge Replacement Program.
BACKGROUND
The existing Frost Avenue Bridge over Phalen Creek is deteriorated, substandard in width, and in need
of replacement. The most recent annual bridge inspection, conducted on behalf of Maplewood by
Ramsey County, indicated that the existing bridge structure is structurally deficient. This does not
mean that the existing bridge is in danger of collapse, rather that it should be scheduled for
replacement and qualifies for funding.
The State of Minnesota has established the State Transportation Fund, also known as the State Bridge
Bond Fund, to assist local government agencies in the replacement of deficient bridges. The City
currently has five bridges under its jurisdiction, and based on the annual inspections, two of these
bridges, the Frost Avenue Bridge over Phalen Creek and the Sterling Street Bridge over Fish Creek,
will need to be replaced in the near future.
In order for the City to apply for funding assistance for the replacement of these bridges, the City needs
to approve a resolution establishing a Prioritized Bridge Replacement List. The establishment of the
Bridge Replacement Prioritization List notifies Mn/DOT of the City’s bridge replacement needs and also
allows the City to apply to Mn/DOT for State Bridge Bond Funding. The establishment of a Prioritized
Bridge Replacement List requires that the City hold a public hearing.
A separate funding application will need to be made to Mn/DOT when the City decides to move forward
with the replacement of each bridge. State Bridge Bond Funds will cover most normal bridge
construction costs; however, demolition of the existing bridge, the construction of bridge
approaches/roadway improvements, aesthetic features, turf establishment, and engineering fees are
not eligible. The State Bridge Bond funds will pay between 50 percent and 100 percent of the eligible
costs. For agencies that have historically used all of their State Aid funds, Mn/DOT has paid 100
Packet Page Number 82 of 275
Agenda Item H1
percent of the eligible items.
In order to secure State Bridge Bond Funding, bridge plans and specifications need to be prepared and
approved by Mn/DOT. Once this happens, Mn/DOT will commit funds to the project. In the event that
funds are not available at that time, the approved plans will establish the project’s position for funding
when additional funds are made available to Mn/DOT for the State Bridge Bond Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution establishing a Bridge
Replacement Program.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
Packet Page Number 83 of 275
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING A BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM AND CREATING A PRIORITIZED
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT LIST
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has reviewed the pertinent data on bridges requiring replacement,
rehabilitation, or removal, supplied by local citizenry and local units of government; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has identified those bridges that are high priority and that require
replacement, rehabilitation, or removal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The following deficient bridges are high priority, and the City of Maplewood intends to
replace, rehabilitate, or remove these bridges as soon as possible when funds are available.
OldRoad Number TotalStateFederalLocal or Proposed
Bridgeor Name ConstructionBridgeFundsState AidConstruction
NumberCostFundsFunds
Year
4984 Frost Avenue $2,000,000 $1,600,000 $0 $400,000 2011
92252 Sterling Street $500,000 $400,000 $0 $100,000 2015
2. The City of Maplewood does hereby request authorization to replace, rehabilitate, or remove
such bridges.
Packet Page Number 84 of 275
Agenda Item H2
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
DuWayne Konewko, Community Development and Parks Director
SUBJ: Consider Approval of Resolution to Issue Tax Exempt Bonds for
Ecumen’s Purchase of the Regent at Maplewood, LLC.
DATE:
May 13, 2010
INTRODUCTION
Ecumen, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, is requesting approval to issue tax exempt
bonds through the City of Maplewood totaling approximately $6 million dollars. Ecumen
has a purchase agreement with Mr. Michael Pint to acquire the Regent at Maplewood.
The proceeds from this bond will be used in financing a portion of the costs of the
design, acquisition construction and equipping of a 150-unit project providing senior
housing services, assisted and special care services. Additional proceeds will be utilized
for refinancing of prior indebtedness incurred to finance the acquisition and renovation of
the Ecumen’s headquarters located at 3530 Lexington Avenue North, Shoreview,
Minnesota (the housing project and headquarters’ project are referred to herein as the
“Project”). The City is merely a conduit and the money and obligations flow only between
the Lender and the Borrower.
Dougherty & Company will serve as the underwriter for the issuance of these bonds. In
order to process this request, a notice calling for the Public Hearing for the May 24, 2010
City Council meeting was published in the Maplewood Review on May 5, 2010. A copy
of the public hearing notice is attached to this report for your review.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota is
authorized to develop and administer programs of multifamily senior housing
developments and facilities for seniors who need additional assisted living and special
services under the circumstances and within the limitations set forth in the Act.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.07 provides that such programs for Minnesota family
housing and health care developments may be financed by revenue bonds issued by the
City. This housing and health care finance program is undertaken by the City to finance
a Project to be owned and operated by Ecumen, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation. The
City expects to issue revenue bonds pursuant to the Act Minnesota Statutes Section
469.152 to 469.1653 to assist in financing the Project.
The Bonds and the resolution to be adopted by the City will recite that the Bonds, if and
when issued, will not to be payable from or charged upon any of the City's funds, other
than the revenues received under the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the
Trustee under the Trust Indenture and pledged to the payment of the Bonds, and the
City is not subject to any liability on the Bonds. No holder of the Bonds will ever have
the right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxing powers to pay any of the
principal of the Bonds or the interest or premium thereon, or to enforce payment of the
Bonds against any property of the City except the interests of the City in payments to be
made by the Borrower under the Loan Agreement. The Bonds will not constitute a
charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except the
interests of the City in payments to be made by the Borrower under the Loan Agreement
which have been assigned to the Trustee under the Trust Indenture. The Bonds are not
Packet Page Number 85 of 275
a moral obligation on the part of the State or its political subdivisions, including the City
and the Bonds will not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation.
The Borrower will designate the Bonds as Bank Qualified and the Bonds will not count
towards the City's Bank qualification limit. Issuing the Bonds will not affect the credit
rating of the City on Bonds it issues for municipal purposes. Under Federal and State
law in order for the Bonds to be tax exempt, it must be issued by a governmental entity.
BACKGROUND
The Regent at Maplewood, LLC is currently under construction and is owned by Mr.
Michael Pint. The project is located at 3030 Kennard Street in Maplewood and will be
operated under the name of Seasons at Maplewood. The development consists of 150
senior units and is scheduled to open in September of this year. One-hundred and
twenty of these units will be devoted to independent living with services, 15 units of
enhanced care assisted living and 15 units of memory care. The units will average 755
square feet and will be rented to private pay clients.
The City has received an application fee of $3,400. The additional administrative fee
totaling $28,600 will be dispersed to the City when the bond financing closes sometime
in late May. Attached is Ecumen’s application for Tax-Exempt Mortgage Revenue
Financing and requirements. City staff was also able to reach an agreement with
representatives of Ecumen that will require an additional $13,000 be paid to the City’s
PAC account in connection with this request.
Representatives from Ecumen along with Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan will be
present to address the council. Attached is a letter from Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan
regarding the bonds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is recommending council approve the attached resolution authorizing the issuance
of housing and health care revenue bonds to finance projects under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C and Section 469.152 to 469.1653 and authorizing the execution of various
documents in connection with the Project and the bonds.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.) Notice of Public Hearing
2.) Ecumen’s Tax-Exempt Application
3.) Letter From Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan
4.) Resolution Authorizing the Issuance of Revenue Bonds
Packet Page Number 86 of 275
Attachment 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL
FOR ISSUANCE OF HOUSING AND HEALTH CARE REVENUE BONDS
(ECUMEN HEADQUARTERS AND THE SEASONS OF MAPLEWOOD PROJECT)
Packet Page Number 87 of 275
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 88 of 275
Packet Page Number 89 of 275
Packet Page Number 90 of 275
Packet Page Number 91 of 275
Packet Page Number 92 of 275
Packet Page Number 93 of 275
Packet Page Number 94 of 275
Packet Page Number 95 of 275
Packet Page Number 96 of 275
Attachment 3
Mary L. Ippel
VIA E-MAIL
Re: City of Maplewood, Minnesota - Multifamily Housing and Revenue Bonds
(Ecumen Headquarters and The Seasons of Maplewood Project), Series 2010
Packet Page Number 97 of 275
/s/ Mary L. Ippel
Packet Page Number 98 of 275
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 99 of 275
Packet Page Number 100 of 275
Packet Page Number 101 of 275
Packet Page Number 102 of 275
Packet Page Number 103 of 275
Packet Page Number 104 of 275
Packet Page Number 105 of 275
Packet Page Number 106 of 275
Agenda Item I1
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I
SUBJECT: Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, Project 09-15, Resolution
Adopting Revised Assessment Roll
DATE:
May 11, 2010
INTRODUCTION
On May 10, 2010 the city council received twenty-three (23) assessment objections at the Hills and
Dales Area Street Improvements, City Project 09-15, assessment hearing. Recommendations for
action on each of the objections are provided for council approval in considering adopting the final roll.
BACKGROUND
The proposed assessments for the Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements were submitted to the
city council for adoption at the May 10, 2010 meeting. Residents were provided with the required
advanced notice of assessment hearing. Residents were required to file a written notice if they
objected to the assessment amount. Twenty-three property owners provided written objections as
follows:
Objections:
Parcel 092922440077– Amy and Bryan Wallace; 1233 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs.
Wallace are requesting that the assessment be cancelled due to financial hardship and do not
believe the street reconstruction is warranted at this time.
2. Parcel 142922440083 – Patricia A. McDonough; 1750 Howard Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Ms.
McDonough is requesting that the assessment be revised to exclude the storm sewer
assessment as she had to pay for additional storm sewer to be installed at the time her house
was constructed.
3. Parcel 092922430024 – Michael and Sue Wilke; 1152 County Road B E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs. Wilke
are requesting that the assessment be deferred as undeveloped property and have stated that
this area is their backyard and they have no plans on developing this property.
4. Parcel 142922410059 – Perry Dotterman; 1850 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr.
Dotterman is requesting a disability deferral.
5. Parcel 142922410058 – Perry Dotterman; 0 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr.
Dotterman is requesting an undeveloped property deferral.
Packet Page Number 107 of 275
Agenda Item I1
6. Parcel 092922440068 – Jerry and Dolores Markie; 1247 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs.
Markie are requesting a senior citizen deferral.
7. Parcel 092922440122 – George Meyer-Guthman; 2171 Atlantic Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 2 units (street only). Mr. Meyer-
Guthman is requesting a revision of assessment from 2 units to 1 unit.
8. Parcel 142922410016 – Rose Povlitzki; 2233 Ripley Avenue
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs.
Povlitzki is requesting a financial hardship deferral.
9. Parcel 162922110115 – Margaret Chalkline; 2043 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs.
Chalkline is requesting a disability deferral.
10. Parcel 162922110099 – Esther Olson; 2117 Atlantic Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs. Olson
is requesting a revision of assessment.
11. Parcel 162922110053 – Michael Churchich; 1240 Belmont Lane E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr.
Churchich is requesting a financial hardship deferral.
12. Parcel 142922440048 – Bob Serreyn; 1695 Howard Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. Serreyn is
requesting a financial hardship deferral.
13. Parcel 162922140017 – Raymond R. Decker; 2002 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Decker
is requesting a revision of assessment.
14. Parcel 162922110075 – Connie Johnson; 2132 Atlantic Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs.
Johnson is requesting revision of assessment.
15. Parcel 092922440069 – Peggy Hartzell; 1246 E. County Road B
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mrs. Hartzell is
requesting a cancellation of assessment.
16. Parcel 162922140024 – Sao Xiong; 1241 Ryan Avenue E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Sao Xiong is
requesting a financial hardship deferral.
17. Parcel 092922440076 – Barbara Verdon; 1237 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Ms. Verdon is
requesting a cancellation of assessment.
18. Parcel 092922440086 – Rebecca Gurrola; 2210 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mrs. Gurrola is
requesting a cancellation of assessment or a disability deferral.
Packet Page Number 108 of 275
Agenda Item I1
19. Parcel 142922410055 – Jack Hurley; 1829 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1005 Front-Feet along Furness Street
(street only). Mr. Hurley is requesting a revision of assessment.
20. Parcel 162922140012 – Art Moore; 1232 Shryer Avenue E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Moore is
requesting a cancellation of assessment or a financial hardship deferral.
21. Parcel 162922140045 – Kenneth G. Dufner; 2017 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Dufner is
requesting a cancellation of assessment.
22. Parcel 142922440047 – Phoenix Residence Inc.; 1685 Howard Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). The Phoenix
Residence Inc. is requesting a cancellation of assessment.
23. Parcel 142922410048 – Phoenix Residence Inc.; 1866 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). The Phoenix
Residence Inc. is requesting a cancellation of assessment.
Recommended Adjustments
The following action is recommended by staff on each objection request:
Parcel 092922440077– Amy and Bryan Wallace; 1233 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs.
Wallace are requesting that the assessment be cancelled due to financial hardship and do not
deny
believe the street reconstruction is warranted at this time. Staff recommendation is to the
grant
cancellation of assessment and a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of
necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become
due in total with interest.
2. Parcel 142922440083 – Patricia A. McDonough; 1750 Howard Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Ms.
McDonough is requesting that the assessment be revised to exclude the storm sewer
assessment as she had to pay for additional storm sewer to be installed at the time her house
grant
was constructed. Staff recommendation is to a revision of assessment to cancel the storm
sewer portion of the assessment. A copy of record of payment for past storm sewer
installations has been received and verified by city staff.
3. Parcel 092922430024 – Michael and Sue Wilke; 1152 County Road B E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs. Wilke
are requesting that the assessment be deferred as undeveloped property and have stated that
this area is their backyard and they have no plans on developing this property. Staff
grant
recommendation is to an undeveloped propertydeferral (15 years) upon approval of
necessary paperwork. If the property remains undeveloped during the entire 15 year deferral
time period the assessment will be cancelled. If at any point during the 15 year deferral period
the lot is developed the assessment would become active.
Packet Page Number 109 of 275
Agenda Item I1
4. Parcel 142922410059 – Perry Dotterman; 1850 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr.
grant
Dotterman is requesting a disability deferral. Staff recommendation is to a disability
deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period
the assessment would become due in total with interest.
5. Parcel 142922410058 – Perry Dotterman; 0 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr.
grant
Dotterman is requesting an undeveloped property deferral. Staff recommendation is to an
undeveloped propertydeferral (15 years) upon approval of necessary paperwork. If the
property remains undeveloped during the entire 15 year deferral time period the assessment will
be cancelled. If at any point during the 15 year deferral period the lot is developed the
assessment would become active.
6. Parcel 092922440068 – Jerry and Dolores Markie; 1247 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. and Mrs.
grant
Markie are requesting a senior citizen deferral. Staff recommendation is to a senior citizen
deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period
the assessment would become due in total with interest.
7. Parcel 092922440122 – George Meyer-Guthman; 2171 Atlantic Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 2 units (street only). Mr. Meyer-
Guthman is requesting a revision of assessment from 2 units to 1 unit. Staff recommendation is
grant
to a revision of assessment from 2 residential units to 1 residential unit. Proper
documentation has been provided and verified by the city staff. Ramsey County has corrected
the legal description and assigned a new Property Identification Number. This information has
been updated and noted on the final assessment roll.
8. Parcel 142922410016 – Rose Povlitzki; 2233 Ripley Avenue
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs.
grant
Povlitzki is requesting a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to a financial
hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral
time period the assessment would become due in total with interest.
9. Parcel 162922110115 – Margaret Chalkline; 2043 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs.
grant
Chalkline is requesting a disability deferral. Staff recommendation is to a disability deferral
(15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the
assessment would become due in total with interest.
10. Parcel 162922110099 – Esther Olson; 2117 Atlantic Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs. Olson
deny
is requesting a revision of assessment. Staff recommendation is to the request for revision
of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and the
property will realize a benefit from this project.
11. Parcel 162922110053 – Michael Churchich; 1240 Belmont Lane E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr.
grant
Churchich is requesting a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to a
financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year
deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest. Staff
Packet Page Number 110 of 275
Agenda Item I1
deny
recommendation is to their secondary request to reduce the amount of their assessment
by $3,750 due to their past correction of a sanitary sewer problem at their property because this
repair was completed prior to the authorization of this project.
12. Parcel 142922440048 – Bob Serreyn; 1695 Howard Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mr. Serreyn is
deny
requesting a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to the request for
revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and
grant
the property will realize a benefit from this project. Staff recommendation is to a financial
hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral
time period the assessment would become due in total with interest.
13. Parcel 162922140017 – Raymond R. Decker; 2002 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Decker
deny
is requesting a revision of assessment. Staff recommendation is to the request for
revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and
the property will realize a benefit from this project.
14. Parcel 162922110075 – Connie Johnson; 2132 Atlantic Street N.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mrs.
deny
Johnson is requesting revision of assessment. Staff recommendation is to the request for
revision of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy and
grant
the property will realize a benefit from this project. Staff recommendation is to a financial
hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral
time period the assessment would become due in total with interest.
15. Parcel 092922440069 – Peggy Hartzell; 1246 E. County Road B
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mrs. Hartzell is
deny
requesting a cancellation of assessment. Staff recommendation is to the request for
cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy
and the property will realize a benefit from this project.
16. Parcel 162922140024 – Sao Xiong; 1241 Ryan Avenue E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Sao Xiong is
grant
requesting a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation is to a financial hardship
deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period
the assessment would become due in total with interest.
17. Parcel 092922440076 – Barbara Verdon; 1237 Leland Road
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Ms. Verdon is
deny
requesting a cancellation of assessment. Staff recommendation is to the request for
cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy
and the property will realize a benefit from this project.
18. Parcel 092922440086 – Rebecca Gurrola; 2210 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). Mrs. Gurrola is
requesting a cancellation of assessment or a disability deferral. Staff recommendation is to
deny
the request for cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the
City’s assessment policy and the property will realize a benefit from this project. Staff
grant
recommendation is to a disability or senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of
Packet Page Number 111 of 275
Agenda Item I1
necessary paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become
due in total with interest.
19. Parcel 142922410055 – Jack Hurley; 1829 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1005 Front-Feet along Furness Street
(street only). Mr. Hurley is requesting a revision of assessment. Staff recommendation is to
grant
a revision of assessment by adjusting the assessable frontage to 733.65 in accordance
with the City’s special assessment policy.
20. Parcel 162922140012 – Art Moore; 1232 Shryer Avenue E.
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Moore is
requesting a cancellation of assessment or a financial hardship deferral. Staff recommendation
deny
is to the request for cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the
City’s assessment policy and the property will realize a benefit from this project. Staff
grant
recommendation is to a financial hardship deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary
paperwork. After the 15 year deferral time period the assessment would become due in total
with interest.
21. Parcel 162922140045 – Kenneth G. Dufner; 2017 Duluth Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). Mr. Dufner is
deny
requesting a cancellation of assessment. Staff recommendation is to the request for
cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s assessment policy
grant
and the property will realize a benefit from this project. Staff recommendation is to a
senior citizen deferral (15 year) upon approval of necessary paperwork. After the 15 year
deferral time period the assessment would become due in total with interest.
22. Parcel 142922440047 – Phoenix Residence Inc.; 1685 Howard Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street only). The Phoenix
deny
Residence Inc. is requesting a cancellation of assessment. Staff recommendation is to
the request for cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s
assessment policy and the property will realize a benefit from this project.
23. Parcel 142922410048 – Phoenix Residence Inc.; 1866 Furness Street
It is currently proposed that the property be assessed for 1 unit (street and storm). The Phoenix
deny
Residence Inc. is requesting a cancellation of assessment. Staff recommendation is to
the request for cancellation of assessment as this property is being assessed per the City’s
assessment policy and the property will realize a benefit from this project.
BUDGET
Any assessments that are ultimately revised would have an impact on the tax levy. No changes to the
approved budget are anticipated at this time.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached Resolution for Adopting Revised
Assessment Roll for the Hills and Dales Area Street Improvements, City Project 09-15.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Adopting Revised Assessment Roll
2. Assessment Roll
3. Location Map
4. Assessment Objections
Packet Page Number 112 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT ROLL
Packet Page Number 113 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 114 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 115 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 116 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 117 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 118 of 275
Agenda Item I1
FINALASSESSMENT ROLL
Attachment 2
CITY PROJECT 09-15
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIALSTORMSTREETTOTAL
Parcel IDTAXPAYERStreet NumberStreetFRONT
UNITSASSESSMENTASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE
162922110079KEVIN D FLANDERS2108ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110078ROBERT J YUNKER2114ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110099ESTHER D OLSON2117ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110077TAI THAO2120ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110076GERALD J HANGGI2126ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110098ROBERT B FLETCHER2127ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110075CONNIE JOHNSON2132ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110074CORINNE M CRAWFORD2142ATLANTIC ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110095MICHAEL R MORRISON2145ATLANTIC ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
*** 092922440163GEORGE MEYER GUTHMAN2171ATLANTIC ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440158MAHENDRA T PERSAUD2275ATLANTIC ST N180.30$0.00$23,799.60$23,799.60
162922110060NENG MOUA1200BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110059RICHARD J SMITH1206BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110082DORIS E RUSSO1207BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110058KENNETH C HILL1210BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110083NHIA YANG1213BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110057JESSICA AREND1216BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110084JAMES E EDENS1219BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110056JAMES E DAHLQUIST1220BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110085BARRY J ENGELDORF1225BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110055DAVID R JERUSAL1226BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110054RICHARD J ASP1230BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110086HEATHER LEIGH JONES1233BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110053MICHAEL J CHURCHICH1240BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110087DANIEL ODEGARD1241BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110052JAMES F DOMAGALL1256BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110022JOHN L GALLAGHER1259BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110051LOUIS BIRCHEM1262BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110023MARY A MCLANE1265BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110050RICHARD O STEDMAN1268BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110024STEVEN A MUELLER1271BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110025WILLIAM J LEE1279BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110039WA MENG VANG1280BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110026FAYE R PETERSON1285BELMONT LN E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110073SALVADOR A MORALES ESCOBAR1244BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110007CLARENCE MANKE1249BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110008MENG VANG1257BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110009KENNETH R WELK1265BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110010DENNIS D KRIEGER1271BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110019TIMOTHY A JAAFARU1272BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110011KEVIN P GUTHE1277BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110018RICHARD J NOWICKI1278BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110012ANDREW MEYSEMBOURG1283BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110017JAMES A MORELLI1284BURKE AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110037NHI HA2066CHAMBERS ST01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140064NANCY M EMBERTSON1996CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140065JOYCE JURMU2000CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140027JASON D BRENHOFER2001CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140028CAMREN L JOHNSON2007CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140029MICHAEL R SCHWINTEK2013CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140005RICHARD C MAY2014CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140030LAURA P ZABROWSKI2021CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140006THOMAS A HALE2022CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140009DALE R MUELLNER2027CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140007DREW S WHITSON2028CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140008JENNIFER MCGEEHAN2036CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110034JOSHUA C SUNNARBORG2044CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110049MICHAEL A KAGER2047CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110035LORRAINE M GRUBER2050CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110040ROGER J ROUSSLANG2055CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110036SUSAN D GRANDELL2058CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110038ROBERT D TARNOWSKI2072CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110021JANA R GUGGISBERG2108CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110088HARRY M SCHMIDT2115CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110072PAUL B WHITE2127CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110020RICHARD W KASPRZAK SINGLE2128CHAMBERS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
092922410018RICHARD L MILLER1233COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922440143BEE YANG1244COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922440144FRANK J WEGLEITNER1252COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922440145SIMON HER1260COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922440146GARY J FLASCH1268COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922440147THOMAS M SHOCK1276COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922440148ROGER A FRANZ1282COPE AVE E01$0.00$4,950.00$4,950.00
092922430016JAY C STUTSMAN1108COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430018WILLIAM H SKADDEN1112COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430024MICHAEL E WILKE1152COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440038COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS1187COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440032EMILY M ARMISTEAD1233COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440069PEGGY J THOMASON1246COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440054US BANK NAT ASSOCIATION1247COUNTY ROAD B E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430034DEBORAH A PENDERGAST2160DAY RD N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430037RAYMOND C WANLESS2170DAY RD N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430039JOSEPH M VIGNALO 2195DAY RD N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430017JANET M BECKER2199DAY RD N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110106ALICIA L MEYER2119DULUTH PL N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110100DONALD YOLEME OGIDI2122DULUTH PL N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110105ERIC ANTHONY WEISSER2125DULUTH PL N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110104SHIRLEY M HEROFF2133DULUTH PL N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110101THOMAS R MAIER2134DULUTH PL N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110102DENNIS J CLARK2140DULUTH PL N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922140050GARY J HUNT1981DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140019DOLLY PALACIO ROA1988DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140049RUSSELL D BIRKHOLZ1989DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
Packet Page Number 119 of 275
Agenda Item I1
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
Attachment 2
CITY PROJECT 09-15
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIALSTORMSTREETTOTAL
Parcel IDTAXPAYERStreet NumberStreetFRONT
UNITSASSESSMENTASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE
162922140018DAVID L GRUPA1994DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140048WAYNE A NELSON1995DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140047TIMOTHY K ANDERSON2001DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140017RAYMOND RICHARD DECKER2002DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140046GREGORY R VOLKERS2009DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140045KENNETH G DUFNER2017DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140044RANDAL B GIESECKE2023DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140038MARY C MULLANE2026DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140043JOHN J MCNULTY2029DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140039GEORGE F TAIT TRUSTEE OF2032DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140042MATTHEW S BRAKE2037DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110115MARGARET CHALKLINE2043DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110062CHARLES G ROHRBACH2048DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110114JOSEPH W LINDER2049DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110113MARGARET J FETT2057DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110061ONA S FONTAINE2058DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110112LUE YANG2065DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110111JEFFREY M HAFNER2071DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110110STEPHEN J MUZIKAR2079DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110081GARY FRANK JOHNSON2082DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110108MICHAEL A MANOS2085DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110109GALEN JOHN PECK2091DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110080ROSS METZ2092DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110116KEITH D CAMERON2099DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110107PAUL D ANDERSON2105DULUTH ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110120SAMUEL P SCHMITZ2137DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440086REBECCA T GURROLA2210DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430005STEVEN J REMICK2223DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430004CECILIA A JUNGMAN2233DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440039TOU KONG2242DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440024DONALD E FOSTER2254DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430003GORDON W ANDERSON 2255DULUTH ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110119PAUL J STERZINGER1184JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440126JEFFREY A BAUER1187JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440125ANDREW T GIOINO1195JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110090JASON M TILLGES1200JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440130JOHN M LAVALLE1201JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440156SHERYL L SOBASKI1205JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110091WADE A GREEN1208JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440124WARREN D HIGGINS1213JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110092SEAN M KAZOS1216JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110093HENRY H SCHUETTE1224JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440123KEITH J HANSON1225JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110094AUDREY E LERDAHL1232JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440112TERRENCE J GARRITY1247JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110006MICHAEL DONAHUE1250JUNCTION AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
092922440111JEREMY STOCK1255JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110005JON S DWORAK1260JUNCTION AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
092922440110PA THAO1263JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110004HARRIS C RIVARD1268JUNCTION AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
092922440109PAMELA J STACK1271JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110003KENNETH M NELSON1276JUNCTION AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
092922440108PEGGY A JERUSAL1277JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922110002ROY L WILLETT1282JUNCTION AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
092922440107JAMIE R BRUNOTTE1285JUNCTION AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440040THOMAS GOULDING1192LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440023MICHAEL J DONNER1193LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440022KIRK O SMITH1199LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440041EDWARD J ZIEBOL1200LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440021JACOB JEPSON1203LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440042EUGENE F BRUNJES1208LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440020DAVID J GOETZKE1209LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440043SPENCER PEHAM1214LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440019TYRONE EVANS1215LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440044HERBERT C YOCH1216LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440018POLLY A ROUTZAHN1221LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440045RUDOLPH F UNGAR1224LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440017STEVEN H LITTLE1227LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440046MELISSA J LILJEDAHL1232LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440016TWIN CITIES HMONG ALLIANCE CH1233LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440055ELIZABETH A MORRISON1248LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440159KURT FECHTER1251LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440056ANGEL R REYNOSO1254LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440140PAO VANG1259LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440057AMBER FISCHER1260LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440139TONG HER1265LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440058ARNOLD R OMATH1270LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440138CHAI S THAO1273LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440059CHARLES E DOBIHAL1276LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440137KOURY TOOMEY1279LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440060WALTER P LINDEMAN1284LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440002BERET POPPA1287LARK AVE E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
92922430028MARY C PUGACZEWSKI0LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430019PAUL F BAUDE1117LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430038RONALD R KENDRICK1120LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430036WILLIAM S ADAMS1126LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430020ROGER C BREMER1129LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430035CLIFFORD J MCGINNIS1134LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430023NANCY B FOX1135LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430033KENNETH H BJORK1140LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430032SHAWN P JENSEN1152LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430031BETTY J OIEN1160LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430025RICHARD L FOSSE1161LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
Packet Page Number 120 of 275
Agenda Item I1
FINALASSESSMENT ROLL
Attachment 2
CITY PROJECT 09-15
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIALSTORMSTREETTOTAL
Parcel IDTAXPAYERStreet NumberStreetFRONT
UNITSASSESSMENTASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE
092922430030PAUL BABIN1170LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922430029JACOB D SARRACK1172LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440085VIVIAN M IGWACHO1187LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440127ROGER B OLSEN1190LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440128ROSS W ELLWANGER1194LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440084BETTY EDDY1197LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440129ROBERT J SMITH1200LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440083MITCHELL MILES MULLIGAN1201LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440082PETER P SARNE1205LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440157LORRAINE A HUSS1206LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440081CLAYTON E VESEL1211LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440132DAVID T BREWITZ1212LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440080PAULA M MCALLISTER1215LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440133FEDERAL HOME LOAN MTG CORP1218LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440079NEAL ALAN LEWIS1221LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440134EARL E WEIBEL1222LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440078PAUL T SCHAEFER1227LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440135ARIEL C PADILLA1228LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440136BRADLEY A KELBE1232LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440077BRYAN WALLACE1233LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440076JAY R GRUETT1237LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440113ROBERT W HART1246LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440068JERRY L MARKIE1247LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440067TEGEITU WORKU1251LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440114MARVEL J GARDNER1252LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440115TROY M GLAUS1260LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
09292244006644 1840XR BATTISTA LLC1261LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440065JAMES J WULFING1263LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440116ROBERT J JOHNSON1268LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440117EDWARD J KOENIG1276LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440064JAMES L KEMP 1277LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440118DAVID J SCHMIDT1284LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
092922440063LARRY JASINSKI1285LELAND RD E01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
162922140052MICHAEL J HERRON1106RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140051PAUL W WOODWARD1110RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140053RAYMOND E TROTTER1202RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140054BERNARD E KELCHER1210RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140020G W RASMUSSEN1211RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140055MARGARET M BARR1216RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140021DONAVAN & COGAN1219RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140056STEPHEN M OERTER1224RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140022REID E ANDERSON1227RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140057MILLARD B ODEAN1230RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140023BRIGITTE E DEEG1233RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140058KAY STACK1236RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140024SAO XIONG1241RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140059RICHARD L PELOQUIN1244RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140025GLORIA A JOHNSON1249RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140060TIMOTHY S KERSHAW1250RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140026DOROTHY H MILLER1255RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140061ERIC ANDRUS1258RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140062ROGER W ZENTZIS1264RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140063STEVEN E GARBERS1270RYAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140037KENNETH J SASIK1203SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140016MARJORIE A JONES1210SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140036CHRISTOPHER R SAGER1211SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140015PHILIP A DEZELAR1216SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140035KEVIN PURINTON1219SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140014JOHN M VRUNO1222SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140034RICHARD URBANIAK1225SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140013JAMES A KABITZ1226SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140033DAVID GOBLIRSCH1231SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140012MEGAN NELSON1232SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140032MARY ANN GRUBER1237SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140011KENNETH V COLLINS1238SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140031DREW S WHITSON1243SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140010DREW S WHITSON1246SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110047JAMES E SEXTON1249SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110048VINCENT RODRIGUEZ1255SHRYER AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140040STEVEN M GUNN1206SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110063SCOTT W ROSTRON1211SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922140041PATRICIA MARIE HIRSCH1212SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110046ANGEL V LOZANO1218SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110064EDWIN F GROLLA1219SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110045MARK F WINTER1224SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110065WILLIAM F WILL1225SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110044JENNIFER R CLEM1230SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110066DENNIS C KRAMER1231SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110043MARY LOUISE FORGA1236SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110067RICHARD A BOROWICZ1237SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110068CY THAO1243SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110042GERALD ODMARK1244SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110069DALE V DEREMER1249SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110041ROY R KRAJEWSKI1252SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110070SENG CHER HER1255SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
162922110071JONATHAN K ANDERSON1261SKILLMAN AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410058PERRY S DOTTERMAN0FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410043PETER A FISCHER1812FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410044SCOTT A ANDERSON1826FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
**** 142922410055CANVASBACK INVESTMENTS LLC1829FURNESS ST N733.650$0.00$96,841.80$96,841.80
142922410045DEBORAH A WALLACE1842FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410046ANTOINETTE M EGGERT1846FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410059PERRY S DOTTERMAN1850FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
Packet Page Number 121 of 275
Agenda Item I1
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
Attachment 2
CITY PROJECT 09-15
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIALSTORMSTREETTOTAL
Parcel IDTAXPAYERStreet NumberStreetFRONT
UNITSASSESSMENTASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
FOOTAGE
142922410048PHOENIX RESIDENCE INC1866FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410049WENDY BURTON1872FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410050AARON L VANHOUTEN1880FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410051WENDY M SEDERSTROM1884FURNESS ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440047PHOENIX RESIDENCE INC1685HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440048BOB A M SERREYN1695HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440013DELBERT D MITCHELL JR1700HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440014THOMAS F FREMONT1702HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440036CANDICE R RICHARDSON1709HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440015DAVID HALPER1714HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440035KATHRYN A MORSCHING1715HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440016AARON L VANHOUTEN1724HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440034ROBERT S ANDERSON1725HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440017JAMES R BELL1732HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440033ROBERT K CAMPBELL1737HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440084RACHEL B JOHNSON 1742HOWARD ST N01$726.67$6,600.00$7,326.67
142922440032BRUCE S CASSELTON1745HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
***** 142922440083PATRICIA A MCDONOUGH1750HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440031WARREN R LINDORFF1753HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440019ANITA M MAGNUSON1756HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440030MARK P ROGERS1759HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440020MICHAEL REGENAUER1762HOWARD ST N02$545.00$13,200.00$13,745.00
142922440029TERRY M JOHNSON1765HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922440021ERIC GAVIC1772HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440028JERROL J HANSON1783HOWARD ST N01$0.00$6,600.00$6,600.00
142922410040RUSSELL N JOHNSON1811HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410020THOMAS E MADIGAN1818HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410039LEO GUZMAN1821HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410021KAREN M HARALDSEN1830HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410038RANDY E DAVIS1831HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410022VINCENT P LAVIANO1838HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410023AUDREY J SORENSEN1848HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410037LUKE J O'NEILL1849HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410024BRUCE A BAILEY1860HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410036DIANE TARNOWSKI1863HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410025FRANCES A MARSDEN1872HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410035NANCY C JUNGMANN1875HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410026THERESA R MERRIGAN1880HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410034KRISTINE M ROLF1885HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410027HOWARD A PANKONIN1894HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410033BENJAMIN R CATTOOR1895HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410031JAMES A CARLSON1913HOWARD ST N01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
* 142922440001GORDON E CARIVEAU1785MCKNIGHT RD N01$0.00$3,642.83$3,642.83
** 142922410057CHRISTEL M BORGHEIINCK1805MCKNIGHT RD N01$0.00$3,686.71$3,686.71
142922410042SHERYL THOMPSON2175RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440027RICHARD D PETERSON2178RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440026ROBERT J FRETZ2180RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440025ISAIAH T MAENDEL2190RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410041MARK A CHRISTOPHERSON2199RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410019JAMES ALFRED VEREIDE2209RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440024BARBARA J PERICHILLI2210RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440023ANITA MARIE BAUER BARTKEY2216RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410018GERALD L OCH2217RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440022MILDRED GUND2222RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410017ROBERT E STARK2225RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922410016CYRIL POVLITZKI2233RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440003LISA K MANLEY2234RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
142922440002MARYJEAN SHEPPARD2242RIPLEY AVE E01$1,090.00$6,600.00$7,690.00
TOTALS914 336
$212,731.67$2,320,820.94$2,533,552.61
TOTAL =$2,533,552.61
2009 ASSESSMENT RATES:
RESIDENTIAL STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT = $1,090 PER UNIT
RESIDENTIAL FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $6,600 PER UNIT
RESIDENTIAL PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $4,950 PER UNIT
MULTI-FAMILY STORM SEWER = $21.80/FRONT FOOT
MULTI-FAMILY FULL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $132.00/FRONT FOOT
MULTI-FAMILY PARTIAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION = $99.00/FRONT FOOT
CREDIT PER THE CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX (CCI): YEAR 1991=$4,835; YEAR 2009=$8,570
* PARCEL ID 142922440001 - 1991 ASSESSMENT = $1,668.37, ASSESSMENT CREDIT PER CCI = $2,957.17, ADJUSTED 2009 ASSESSMENT = $3,642.83
** PARCEL ID 142922410057 - 1991 ASSESSMENT = $1,643.61, ASSESSMENT CREDIT PER CCI = $2,913.29, ADJUSTED 2009 ASSESSMENT = $3,686.71
*** PARCEL ID 092922440163 - PARCEL ID UPDATED DUE TO LOT DIVISION - ASSESSMENT REDUCED FROM 2 UNITS TO ONE UNIT
**** PARCEL ID 142922410055 - FRONT FOOTAGE ADJUSTED FROM 1005 FEET TO 733.65 FEET REDUCING ASSESSMENT FROM $132,660.00 TO $96,841.80
***** PARCEL ID 142922440083 - STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT CANCELLED DUE TO PROOF OF PREVIOUS STORM ASSESSMENT PAYMENT
Packet Page Number 122 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 123 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 124 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 125 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 126 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 127 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 128 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 129 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 130 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 131 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 132 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 133 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 134 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 135 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 136 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 137 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 138 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 139 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 140 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 141 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 142 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 143 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 144 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 145 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 146 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 147 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 148 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 149 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 150 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 151 of 275
Agenda Item I1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 152 of 275
Agenda Item I.2
MEMORANDUM
TO: James Antonen, City Manager
FROM: Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner
Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I
SUBJECT: Floodplain Overlay District Ordinance and Floodplain Insurance Rate
Map Amendments – Second Reading
DATE: May 17, 2010 for the May 24 City Council Meeting
INTRODUCTION
Flooding is the most frequent and costly disaster in Minnesota. The risk for flooding changes
over time due to erosion, land use, weather events, and other factors. The likelihood of flooding
has changed along with these factors.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a multi-year project to re-
examine Ramsey County’s flood zones and develop new floodplain insurance rate maps. In
addition to the flood zone study, FEMA made amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations
dealing with flooding (Code 44, Section 60.3).
On December 17, 2009, FEMA notified the City of Maplewood that we must amend our
floodplain overlay district ordinance and adopt the new floodplain rate panel maps by June 4,
2010.If the city does not meet this deadline, the city will be suspended from the flood insurance
program.
To aid in the ordinance update, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed
Maplewood’s current floodplain ordinance and recommended changes to meet the new FEMA
regulations. These changes have been added to the floodplain ordinance (attached).
BACKGROUND
In 1986, the city adopted a floodplain ordinance and maps based on FEMA and DNR
requirements at that time.
In 2008 and 2009, FEMA conducted a floodplain study of Ramsey County, updated the
floodplain rate panel maps, and made amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations.
On December 17, 2009, FEMA notified the City of Maplewood that we must amend our
floodplain overlay district ordinance and adopt the new floodplain insurance rate maps by June
4, 2010, or the city would be suspended from the flood insurance program.
In February and March, 2010, the Environmental and Natural Resources (ENR) Commission
reviewed the floodplain ordinance amendments. The commission recommended approval of
the amendments during their March 24, 2010, meeting.
Packet Page Number 153 of 275
On April 20, 2010, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the
floodplain ordinance amendments.
On May 10, 2010, the City Council adopted the first reading of the floodplain ordinance
amendments.
DISCUSSION
Major Changes Proposed
The city’s floodplain overlay district ordinance is required to comply with the rules and
regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (codified as 44 Code of Federal
Regulations Parts 59-78). Following is a summary of the changes required to comply with the
new regulations:
1. Adoption of new floodplain insurance rate maps, which will become effective June 4,
2010.
2. New definitions.
3. Change to permitted uses.
4. New administration requirements.
5. Additional variance standards.
6. Changes to what can be done to nonconforming buildings.
Placement of Ordinance in the City Code
The floodplain overlay district ordinance is located in the zoning chapter (Chapter 44) of the city
code. Once the city code is codified, staff proposes to relocate the floodplain ordinance to the
Environment Chapter (Chapter 18) along with all other environmental ordinances.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the second reading of the attached floodplain ordinance amendments (attached). The
floodplain ordinance is being amended to meet the new Federal Emergency Management
Agency’s flood regulations and to adopt the new floodplain insurance rate maps which will
become effective June 4, 2010.
Attachment: Floodplain Ordinance
Packet Page Number 154 of 275
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 44 (ZONING), ARTICLE VIII (FLOODPLAIN
OVERLAY DISTRICT)
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
This amendment revises portions of the city’s zoning code (Chapter 44) dealing with the
floodplain overlay district (Sections 44-1191 through 44-1209). This amendment also moves
this section of the zoning code in its entirety to the Environment Chapter (Chapter 18) of the city
code.
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANCE
Section 1 44-1191. Authorization.
The state legislature has in Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 103F and 462, delegated the authority
to local governmental units to adopt regulations designed to lessen flood losses. Minnesota
Statute, Chapter 103F further stipulates that communities subject to recurrent flooding must
participate and maintain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Therefore, the city
has adopted this ordinance.
Sec. 2 44-1192. Purpose.
The purpose of this ordinance is to lessen potential losses due to periodic flooding, including loss
of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards. Further, it is also to lessen the disruption of
commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public payments for flood protection and
relief, and impairment of the tax base. Within the meaning of the National Flood Insurance
Program, all of these adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare.
Sec. 3 44-1193. Liability.
This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the floodplain districts or land uses permitted
within such districts will be free from flooding or damages. This ordinance shall not create liability
on the part of the city or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from
reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decisions lawfully made under this ordinance.
Sec. 4 44-1194. Adoption of flood insurance rate map.
Flood Insurance Study for Ramsey County, Minnesota (All Jurisdictions) and the Flood Insurance
Rate Map Panels therein numbered 27123C0038G, 27123C0039G, 27123C0041G,
27123C0042G, 27123C0043G, 27123C0044G, 27123C0065G, 27123C0101G, 27123C0102G,
27123C0110G, 27123C0117G, 27123C0119G, 27123C0130G, and 27123C0140G, all dated
June 4, 2010 and prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), are
hereby adopted by reference as the official Floodplain Map and made a part of this ordinance.
The city hereby adopts the flood insurance rate map for the city, dated ___________, developed
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The city adopts this map by reference as the
official floodplainzoning district map and makes it part of this ordinance.
1
Packet Page Number 155 of 275
Sec. 5 44-1195. Applicability.
(a) This ordinance shall apply to all lands designated as floodplain within the city and has
been revised in 2010 to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood
Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as
amended, so as to maintain the city’s eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program.
(b) Annexations. The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference above may
include floodplain areas that lie outside of the corporate boundaries of the City of
Maplewood at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land
areas are annexed into the City of Maplewood after the date of adoption of this
ordinance, the newly annexed floodplain lands shall be subject to the provisions of this
ordinance immediately upon the date of annexation into the City of Maplewood.
(c) Abrogation and Greater Restrictions. It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal,
abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However,
where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance shall
prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the
extent of the inconsistency only.
(d) Severability. If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged
unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this
ordinance shall not be affected thereby.
Sec. 6 44-1196. Interpretation.
The director of community development shall determine the boundaries of the floodplain district by
scaling distances on the official floodplain zoning district map. Where there is a need for
interpretation about the exact location of the boundaries of the floodplain district, the director of
community development shall make the necessary interpretation based on the ground elevations
that existed on the site at the time the city adopted its initial floodplain ordinance or the date of
the first National Flood Insurance Program map that placed the site in the floodplain if earlier.
The director shall make this interpretation based on the elevations of the regional (100-year) flood
profile, if available. If 100-year flood elevations are not available, the city shall:
(a) Require a floodplain evaluation consistent with Sections 11(a)44-1201(a) to determine a
100-year flood elevation for the site; or
(b) Base its decision on available hydraulic/hydrologic or site elevation survey data.
Sec. 7 44-1197. Definitions.
Unless specifically defined in this ordinance, the words or phrases used in this ordinance have the
same meaning as they have in common usage. A person shall interpret these words or phrases
to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. The following words, terms and phrases
when used in this ordinance, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this ordinance, except
where the context clearly indicates a different meaning:
Accessory Use or Structure means a use or structure on the same lot with, and of a nature
customarily incidental and subordinate to, the principal use or structure.
2
Packet Page Number 156 of 275
Basement means any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base
subgrade below ground level on all four sides. This is regardless of the depth of excavation below
ground level.
Director means the director of community development.
Flood fringe means that portion of the floodplain outside the floodway.
Floodplain means the channel or beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, watercourse or
lake which a regional flood may have or could hereafter cover. Floodplain areas within the city
shall include all areas shown as Zone A or Zone AE on the flood insurance rate map.
Floodway means the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those
portions of the adjoining floodplain which the regional flood reasonably requires to carry or store
the regional flood discharge.
Lowest floor means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement).
Manufactured home means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on
a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when
attached to the required utilities. The term “manufactured home” does not include the term
“recreational vehicle.”
Obstruction means any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection,
excavation, dredged spoil, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill,
structure, stockpile of sand or gravel or other material, or matter in, along, across or projecting into
any channel, watercourse, lake bed or regulatory floodplain which may impede, retard or change
the direction of flow in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by floodwater.
Recreational vehicle means a vehicle that is built on a single chassis, is four hundred (400)
square feet or less when measured at the largest projection, is designed to be self-propelled or
permanently towable by a light duty truck, and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent
dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use.
Regional flood means a flood which represents the large floods known to have occurred in
Minnesota. Such a flood is characteristic of what one can expect to occur on an average of every
100 years. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the Flood Insurance
Rate Map.
Regulatory flood protection elevation means the elevation no lower than two (2) feet one foot
above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by
encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway.
Structuremeans anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or
on-site utilities. This includes, but is not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages,
cabins, manufactured homes or recreational travel trailers/vehicles not meeting the exemption
criteria specified in Section 19(a)(1) 44-1209(a)(1) and other similar items.
3
Packet Page Number 157 of 275
Substantial damage means damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of
restoring the structure prior to its damaged condition would equal or exceed fifty (50) percent of
the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.
Substantial improvement means any consecutive 365-day period, any reconstruction,
rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), repair after damage, addition, or other
improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50) percent of the market
value of the structure before the “start of construction” of the improvement. This term includes
structures that have incurred “substantial damage,” regardless of the actual repair work
performed. The term does not, however, include either:
(a) Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local
health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local
code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living
conditions.
(b) Any alteration of an “historic structure,” provided that the alteration will not preclude the
structure’s continued designation as an “historic structure.” For the purpose of this
ordinance, “historic structure” shall be as defined in 44 Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 59.1.
Sec. 8 44-1198. Overlay zoning.
A floodplain zoning district shall be considered an overlay zoning district to all existing land use
regulations of the city. The city may allow the uses permitted in this ordinance sections 36-499
and 36-500 of this article only if they are allowed by the underlying zoning district. This ordinance
shall apply in addition to other city regulations and where this ordinance imposes greater
restrictions.
Sec. 9 44-1199. Compliance.
No person shall use a new structure or land without full compliance with this ordinance. No
person may locate, extend, convert, repair, maintain, or structurally alter a structure without full
compliance with this ordinance. Within the floodway and flood fringe, the city prohibits all uses not
listed as permitted uses in Sections 10 and 11 44-1200 and 44-1201. In addition, the following
regulations shall apply:
(a) New manufactured homes, replacement manufactured homes and certain travel trailers
and travel recreational vehicles are subject to the general provisions of this ordinance and
specifically Sections 10, 11, and 19 44-1200, 44-1201 and 44-1209.
(b) The sections of this ordinance regulate changes, modifications, repair and maintenance,
additions, structural alterations or repair after damage to existing nonconforming structures
and nonconforming uses of structures or land.
(c) As stated in Section 14 44-1204, a person shall use ground surveys to certify as-built
elevations for elevated structures.
4
Packet Page Number 158 of 275
Sec. 10 44-1200. Permitted uses and standards.
(a) Permitted Uses. The following uses of land are permitted uses in the floodplain district:
(1) Any non-structural land use which does not obstruct flood flows, such as gardens,
fill, excavation, or storage of materials or equipment. Any use of land which does
not involve a structure, a fence, an addition to the outside dimensions to an
existing structure (including a fence) or an obstruction to flood flows such as fill,
excavation, or storage of materials or equipment.
(2) The following activities if they are entirely within the flood fringe:
a) The construction of new structures.
b) The placement or replacement of manufactured homes.
c) Additions to existing structures or obstructions, such as fill or storage of
materials or equipment.
The uses in Subsections (a)(1) and (2) of this Section shall be subject to the development
of standards in Subsection (b) of this section. They are also subject to the floodplain
evaluation criteria in Section 11 44-1201.
(3) Travel trailers and travel Recreational vehicles as regulated under Section 19 44-
1209.
(b) Standards for floodplain permitted uses. Standards for floodplain permitted uses shall be
as follows:
(1) A person shall compact fill and protect the slopes from erosion by the appropriate
methods. Such methods include the use of containment dikes or levees, riprap,
vegetative cover or other acceptable method. FEMA has established criteria for
removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly
elevated on fill above the 100-year flood elevation. FEMA's requirements have
specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multi-structure or
multi-lot developments. A person should investigate these standards before
starting site preparation if a person wishes to request a change of special flood
hazard area designation.
(2) Storage of materials and equipment shall be in accordance with the following:
a) The city prohibits the storage or processing of materials that are, in time of
flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially harmful to human, animal, or
plant life.
b) The city may allow the storage of other materials or equipment if readily
removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning or if
placed on fill at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
5
Packet Page Number 159 of 275
(3) The city shall not permit uses or activities which will adversely affect the capacity of
the channels or floodways of any tributary to the main stream, or of any drainage
ditch, or any other drainage facility or system.
(4) No person shall construct a structure, including accessory structures, additions to
existing structures and manufactured homes on fill unless the lowest floor,
including basement floor, basement floor, or first floor if there is no basement, is at
or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The finished fill elevation
must be no lower than one (1) foot below the Regulatory Flood Protection
Elevation. The finished fill shall extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet
beyond the limits of the structure constructed thereon.
(5) All uses. The city shall not permit uses that do not have vehicular access at or
above an elevation not more than two (2) feet below the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation to lands outside the floodplain. The city may permit such uses
if the city council grants a variance. In granting a variance, the city council shall
specify limitations on the period of use or occupancy of the use. The city council
must also determine that adequate flood warning time and local emergency
response and recovery procedures exist before granting such a variance.
(6) Commercial and manufacturing uses. Accessory land uses, such as yards,
railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at elevations lower than the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation. However, the city shall not grant a permit for such
facilities for use by the employees or the public without a flood warning system that
provides adequate time for evacuation if the area would be inundated in water to a
depth which poses significant hazard to individuals (to a depth and velocity such
that when multiplying the depth [in feet] times velocity [in feet per second] the
product number exceeds four [4] upon occurrence of the regional flood). regional
flood would inundate the area to a depth greater than two feet or subject the area
to flood velocities greater than four feet per second.
(7) On-site sewage treatment and water supply systems. Where the city has not
provided public utilities, then the owner shall conform to the following conditions:
a) A person shall design on-site water supply systems to lessen or eliminate
infiltration of flood waters into the systems; and
b) A person shall design new or replacement on-site sewage treatment
systems to lessen or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems
and discharges from the systems into flood waters. Such systems shall not
be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding. The
city shall determine that any sewage treatment system designed according
to the State's standards to be in compliance with this ordinance.
(8) The owner of a manufactured home must securely anchor it to an adequately
anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse and lateral movement.
Methods of anchoring may include, but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or
frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or
local anchoring code requirements for resisting wind forces.
6
Packet Page Number 160 of 275
Sec. 11 44-1201. Floodplain evaluation.
(a) Upon receipt of an application for a permit, manufactured home park development or
subdivision approval within the floodplain district, the director shall require the applicant to
furnish plans and hydrologic/hydraulic analysis by a qualified engineer or hydrologist
specifying the nature of the development. This analysis shall also show whether the
proposed use is located in the floodway or flood fringe and the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation for the site. The city engineer or hydrologist shall follow procedures
consistent with Minnesota Rules 1983 Parts 6120.5000 to 6120.6200 6120.5600
(Technical Standards and Requirements For Floodplain Evaluation) and 6120.5700
(Minimum Floodplain Management Standards for Local Ordinances) and 44 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 65. These procedures are to be used during the technical
evaluation and review of the development proposal.
(b) The director shall submit a copy of all information required by subsection (a) of this section
to the Department of Natural Resource’s (DNR) area hydrologist. This is for the DNR’s
review and comment. The director shall submit this information at least twenty (20) days
before the city grants a permit or manufactured home park development/subdivision
approval. The director shall notify the respective DNR Area Hydrologist within ten (10)
days after the city grants a permit or approves a manufactured home park
development/subdivision.
Sec. 12 44-1202. Utilities and transportation facilities.
All utilities and transportation facilities, including railroad tracks, roads and bridges, shall be
constructed according to state floodplain management standards contained in Minnesota Rules
1983 parts 6120.5000 through 6120.6200.
Sec. 13 44-1203. Subdivisions and manufactured homes.
(a) No person shall subdivide land or develop or expand a manufactured home park where
the city council has determined the site to be unsuitable. The city council shall make the
determination of unsuitability based on flooding or inadequate drainage, water supply or
sewage treatment facilities. The city council shall review the subdivision/development
proposal. This review is to insure that each lot or parcel contains enough area outside the
floodway for fill placement for elevating structures, sewage systems and related activities.
(b) In the floodplain district, applicants for subdivision approval or development of a
manufactured home park or manufactured home park expansion shall provide the
information required in Section 11(a) 44-1201(1). The director shall review the proposed
subdivision or manufactured home park development in according to the standards
established in this ordinance.
(c) The applicant for a subdivision in the floodplain shall clearly label the Floodway and Flood
Fringe boundaries on all required application documents and drawings. The applicant
shall also show the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and the required elevation of all
access roads and streets on all required application drawings and documents.
(d) Removal of Special Flood Hazard Area Designation. FEMA has established criteria for
removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated
on fill above the 100-year flood elevation. FEMA’s requirements include specific fill
7
Packet Page Number 161 of 275
compaction and side slope protection standards for multi-structure or multi-lot
developments. A person should investigate these standards if they are requesting a
change to the special flood hazard area before the initiation of site preparation.
Sec. 14 44-1204. Administration.
(a) Permit required. A person shall secure a permit issued by the city before doing any of the
following:
(1) the construction, addition, modification, rehabilitation (including normal
maintenance and repair), or alteration of any building or structure.
(2)prior to the construction of a dam, fence, or on-site septic system.
(3) changing the use of a building, structure, or land.
(4) changing, extending or enlarging a nonconforming use.
(5) prior to the repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood, fire, tornado, or
any other source.
(6) excavating or placing an obstruction within the floodplain.
(b) State and federal permits. Before granting a city permit or processing an application for a
variance, the city shall determine that the applicant has obtained all necessary state and
federal permits.
(c) Certification of lowest floor elevations. The city shall require the applicant to submit
certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land
surveyor about accomplishing the finished fill and building elevations in compliance with
this ordinance. The building official shall maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest
floor (including basement) for all new structures. The building official shall also maintain a
record of lowest floor elevations for alterations or additions to existing structures in the
floodplain district.
(d) Notifications for watercourse alterations. The director shall notify, in riverine situations,
adjacent communities and the DNR prior to the city authorizing any alteration or relocation
of a watercourse. If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in the beds of public
waters pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 103G, this shall suffice as adequate notice
to the DNR. A copy of said notification shall also be submitted to the Chicago Regional
Office of FEMA.
(e) Notification to FEMA when physical changes increase or decrease the 100-year flood
elevation. As soon as is practicable, but not later than six (6) months after the date, such
supporting information becomes available, the director shall notify the Chicago Regional
Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of said technical or scientific data.
Sec. 15 44-1205. Variances.
(a) A variance means a change to a specific permitted development standard required in an
official control including this ordinance. This change is to allow an alternative development
8
Packet Page Number 162 of 275
standard not stated as acceptable in the official control, but only as applied to a particular
property. This is to lessen a hardship, practical difficulty or unique circumstance.
(b) In granting a variance, the city council shall clearly identify in writing the specific conditions
that existed justified the granting of the variance.
(c) The city council may approve variances from this ordinance. To do so, the city council
makes the findings required for a variance in state law. No variance shall allow a use
prohibited in that district or permit a lower degree of flood protection than the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation. A person may use a variance to change permissible methods
of flood protection.
(d) The following additional FEMA variance criteria must be satisfied:
(1) Variances shall not be issued by a city within any designated regulatory floodway if
any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result.
(2) Variances shall only be issued by a city upon:
a) a showing of good and sufficient cause;
b) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional
hardship to the applicant; and
c) a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased
flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public
expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or
conflict with existing local laws or ordinances.
(3) Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the
minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief.
(e) The director shall submit by mail to the DNR a copy of the application for proposed
variance. The director shall mail such notice at least ten (10) days before the hearing.
The director shall send a copy of all decisions granting a variance by mail to the DNR
within ten (10) days of such action.
(f) Flood insurance notice and record keeping. The director shall let the applicant for a
variance know that:
(1) The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will
result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25
for $100 of insurance coverage; and
(2) Such construction below the 100-year or regional flood level increases risks to life
and property. The city shall maintain such notification with a record of all variance
actions. The city shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including
justification for their issuance. The city shall also report such variances issued in
its annual or biennial report submitted to the administrator of the National Flood
Insurance Program.
9
Packet Page Number 163 of 275
Sec. 16 44-1206. Nonconformities.
A person may continue to use a structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or
amendment of this ordinance but is not in conformity with this ordinance. Uses are subject to the
following conditions (except for historic structures, as defined in Section 7, which shall be subject
to items (a) through (e) as outlined below only):
(a) No person may expand, change, enlarge, or alter a nonconforming use in a way which
increases its nonconformity.
(b) An structural alteration within the inside dimensions of a nonconforming use or structure
(interior alteration) is permissibleprovided it utilizes flood resistant materials so as not to
result in increasing the flood damage potential of that use or structure. This is allowed
only if it will not result in increasing the flood damage potential of that use or structure.
(c) A structural addition to a structure must be elevated to the regulatory flood protection
elevation in accordance with this ordinance.This is allowed only if it will not result in
increasing the flood damage potential of that use or structure.
(d) (c) The cost of all structural alterations or additions both inside and outside a structure to any
nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of
the market value of the structure unless the owner has satisfied the conditions of this
ordinance. The city must calculate the cost of all structural alterations and additions to a
structure since the adoption of the city's initial floodplain controls on July 28, 1986. The
city must calculate these costs into current costs and include all costs such as construction
materials and a reasonable cost placed on all labor. If the current cost of all previous and
proposed alterations and additions exceeds fifty (50) percent of the current market value of
the structure, then the structure must meet the standards of Sections 10 and 11 44-1200
and 44-1201 for new structures.
(e) If any nonconforming use of a structure or land or nonconforming structure is destroyed by
any means, including floods, to an extent of fifty (50) percent or more of its market value at
the time of destruction, the owner shall not reconstruct it except in conformity with this
ordinance. The city council may issue a permit for reconstruction if the use is not in the
floodway and, upon reconstruction the owner adequately elevates it on fill in conformity
with this ordinance.
(f) If a substantial improvement occurs from any combination of a building addition to the
outside dimensions of the existing building or a rehabilitation, reconstruction, alteration, or
other improvement to the inside dimensions of an existing nonconforming building, then
the building addition and the existing nonconforming building must meet the requirements
of Section 10 of this ordinance for new structures, depending upon whether the structure is
in the floodway or flood fringe, respectively.
Sec. 17 44-1207. Penalties for violation.
(a) A violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to follow any of its requirements
(including violations of conditions and safeguards established about the granting of
variances) is a misdemeanor.
10
Packet Page Number 164 of 275
(b) In responding to an ordinance violation, the city may request that the National Flood
Insurance Program deny flood insurance to the guilty party. The city shall act in good faith
to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations when possible.
(c) When an alleged violation is discovered by or shown to the director, the director shall
investigate the situation. The director shall document the nature and extent of the alleged
violation of the official control. As soon as is possible, the city will submit this information
to the proper DNR and FEMA regional offices. The city will also submit its plan of action to
correct the violation to these agencies.
(d) The director shall notify the suspected party of the pertinent requirements of this ordinance
and all other official controls. The director shall also notify the person in question about
the nature and extent of the suspected violation of these controls. If the structure and/or
use are under construction or development, the director may order the construction or
development immediately halted. This construction or development moratorium shall be in
force until the city grants a permit or approval. If the responsible party has completed the
construction or development, then the director may either:
(1) Issue an order identifying the corrective actions that the responsible party must
make within a specified time to bring the use or structure into compliance with the
official controls; or
(2) Notify the responsible party to apply for an after-the-fact permit/development
approval within 30-days.
If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the director within the specified
time, each additional day that lapses is an additional ordinance violation. The city may
prosecute such violations accordingly. The director shall also, upon the lapse of the
specified response time, notify the property owner to restore the land to the condition
which existed before the violation of this article.
Sec. 18 44-1208. Amendments.
The city shall submit all amendments to this ordinance, including revisions to the official floodplain
zoning district map, to be approved by the Natural Resources Department before adoption. The
city shall not remove the floodplain designation on the official floodplain zoning district map unless
the owner fills the area to an elevation at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation and is
contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. Changes in the official floodplain zoning map must
meet FEMA's technical conditions and criteria and must receive prior FEMA approval before
adoption. The DNR must be given ten (10) days written notice of all hearings to consider an
amendment to this ordinance. This notice shall include a draft of the amendment or technical
study under consideration.
Sec. 19 44-1209. Travel trailers and travel Recreational vehicles.
(a) Travel trailers and travel Recreational vehicles that do not meet the exemption criteria
specified in subsection (a)(1)(a) of this section shall be subject to the provisions of this
ordinance. Travel trailers and travel Recreational vehicles shall also be subject to the
conditions listed in the sections below.
(1) Exemption. Recreational A travel trailerand travel vehicles are exempt from the
11
Packet Page Number 165 of 275
provisions of this ordinance if their owner places them in any of the areas listed in
subsection (a)(1)(b) of this section and if it meets the following criteria:
a) Have current licenses required for highway use.
b) Are highway ready meaning on wheels or have an internal jacking system
and that the owner has attached it to the site only by quick disconnect type
utilities commonly used in campgrounds and trailer parks. The travel
trailer/travel recreational vehicle must also not have any permanent
structural additions attached to it.
c) The travel trailer or travel recreational vehicle and associated use must be
an allowed use in the underlying zoning district.
recreational vehicles:
(2) Areas exempted for placement of travel/
a) Individual lots or parcels of record.
b) Existing commercial recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds.
c) Existing condominium-type associations.
(b) Travel trailers and travel Recreational vehicles exempted in subsection (a)(1) of this
section lose this exemption when development occurs on the parcel exceeding five
hundred ($500) dollars. This is for a structural addition to the travel trailer/travel
recreational vehicle or an accessory structure such as a garage or storage building. The
city will then consider the travel trailer/travel recreational vehicle and all additions and
accessory structures as a new structure. The travel trailer/travel recreation vehicle shall
then be subject to the elevation requirements and the use of land restrictions specified in
this ordinance. There shall be no development or improvement on the parcel or
attachment to the recreation vehicle that hinders the removal of the recreational vehicle to
a flood free location should flooding occur.
(c) New commercial travel trailer or travel recreation vehicle parks or campgrounds, new
residential type subdivisions and condominium associations, and the expansion of any
existing similar use exceeding five (5) units or dwelling sites shall be subject to the
following conditions:
(1) The city will allow any new or replacement travel trailer or travel recreational
vehicle in the floodway or flood fringe districts provided the following:
a) The owner places said trailer or recreational vehicle and its contents on fill
above the regulatory flood protection elevation following the provisions of
Section 11 44-1201.
b) Proper elevated road access to the site exists according to Sections 10 and
1144-1200 and 44-1201.
c) No fill placed in the floodway to meet the requirements of this section shall
increase the flood stages of the regional flood.
12
Packet Page Number 166 of 275
(2) As an alternative, the city may allow all new or replacement travel trailers or travel
recreation vehicles not meeting the criteria of subsection (c)(1) of this section, if
such placement is according to the following:
a) The applicant must submit an emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all
vehicles and people during the 100-year flood. A registered engineer or
other qualified individual shall prepare said plan. Said plan shall show that
adequate time and personnel exist to carry out the evacuation.
b) All attendant sewage and water facilities for new or replacement travel
trailers or other recreational vehicles must be protected or constructed so
while flooded they are not impaired or contaminated. The installation of
such facilities shall follow the rules in Section 10(b)(7).
Secs. 44-1210-44-1235. Reserved.
The city council approved the first reading of this ordinance on May 10, 2010.
The city council approved the second reading of this ordinance on May 24, 2010.
Signed:
_______________________________ _______________________________
Will Rossbach, Mayor Date
Attest:
________________________________
Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
13
Packet Page Number 167 of 275
Agenda Item I.3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
Shann Finwall, AICP, Environmental Planner
SUBJECT:
Floodplain Overlay District Summary Ordinance Publication Review (SUPER
MAJORITY VOTE REQUIRED)
DATE:
May 17, 2010 for the May 24 City Council Meeting
INTRODUCTION
The City Council will adopt the floodplain overlay district ordinance and new floodplain
insurance rate maps on May 24, 2010. The ordinance goes into effect upon publication.
According to state law, the City Council may direct that a summary of an ordinance be published
rather than the entire ordinance text.
DISCUSSION
State Statute requires that summary ordinances give an accurate synopsis of the essential
elements of the ordinance. Staff is proposing the following language for the summary ordinance
publication:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT AND
ADOPTING NEW FLOODPLAIN INSURANCE RATE MAPS
On May 24, 2010, the Maplewood City Council amended the floodplain overlay district
ordinance at Article VII. This ordinance amendment is necessary to comply with new Code of
Federal Regulations (Code 44, Section 60.3) which deals with flooding. The ordinance also
adopts the new floodplain rate maps which will become effective June 4, 2010. A summary of
the floodplain ordinance amendments are described below:
1. Adoption of new floodplain rate maps. The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) conducted a multi-year project to re-examine Ramsey County’s flood zones and
develop new floodplain insurance rate maps. FEMA is requiring that the City of
Maplewood adopt the new floodplain insurance rate maps along with the required
floodplain ordinance amendments. The new floodplain insurance rate maps will become
effective June 4, 2010.
2. Definitions. In addition to new definitions required by FEMA, Maplewood is revising the
definition of “Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.” The definition will be revised to
reflect the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District standards to flood protection
elevation, which is no lower than two feet (rather than one foot) above the elevation of
the regional flood.
3. Change to permitted uses. Maplewood’s previous floodplain ordinance described a
permitted use as “any non-structural land use which does not obstruct flood flows, such
as gardens, fill, excavation, or storage of materials or equipment.” The new regulations
Packet Page Number 168 of 275
require that the city change that description as follows: “Any use of land which does not
involve a structure, a fence, an addition to the outside dimensions to an existing
structure (including a fence) or an obstruction to flood flows such as fill, excavation, or
storage of materials or equipment.”
4. New administration requirements. There are expanded permitting requirements for
properties in a floodplain, including obtaining a permit from the city prior to the erection,
addition, modification, and rehabilitation of a structure (including normal maintenance
and repair). Additionally, a permit is required prior to the repair of a structure that has
been damaged by flood, fire, tornado, or any other source.
5. Variances. Additional variance criteria must be satisfied including no variance approval
by the city unless there is a showing of sufficient cause, failure to grant the variance
would result in a hardship, and granting the variance would not result in increased flood
heights.
6. Nonconformities. If a substantial improvement occurs to a nonconforming property from
any combination of a building addition to the outside dimensions of the existing building
or rehabilitation, reconstruction, alteration, or other improvement to the inside
dimensions of an existing nonconforming building, then the building addition and the
existing nonconforming building must meet the requirements of the ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the above-mentioned floodplain ordinance summary publication. Once approved by the
city council, staff will publish the summary ordinance in the city’s official newspaper.
2
Packet Page Number 169 of 275
Agenda Item I4
AGENDA REPORT
TO
: City Manager, Jim Antonen
FROM:
Charles Ahl, Assistant City Manager/Public Works Director
SUBJECT:Consider Approval of Resolution Calling a Public Hearing for July 26,
2010 for the Purpose of Considering and Tax Increment Financing District
[Housing District 1-10] for The Shores of Maplewood within the Gladstone
Redevelopment Area --City Project 04-21
DATE:May 18, 2010
INTRODUCTION
During the past year, the City Council has been notified of possible developers interested in the
Tourist Cabins property and implementing The Shores development concept approved by the City
Council in 2007. Adeveloperrepresented by a partnership of Albert Miller of the Rand Corporation
[who controls ownership of the property throughHighland Bank], Lance Lemieux of Southview Senior
Living, and Jack Rajenbachare now prepared to build 104units of the original 180 unit complex during
2010and 2011.This development grouphasexplored possible financing plansand is now prepared to
close on the property in late June or early July. They have resolved the liens and legal problems
associated with the site, including a settlement with the former site architect, Link Wilson, who is now
the architect for this current proposal. The development group is requesting that the City Council
consider establishing a tax increment financing [TIF] district for the purpose of supporting the
proposed project assessments that the City would like to implement as part of the over first phase of
the Gladstone Redevelopment. In addition, the development group is requesting consideration of
funds for other site improvements specific to the site.
This item has been placed on the agenda for calling a public hearing to discuss the establishment of a
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. The developer partnership has submitted a TIF Application. A
public hearing is required prior to the consideration of TIF financing. Our financial consultant,
Springsted, Inc. has prepared the attached timeline for the consideration of TIF. The analysis of the
district and the financial needs of the developer and development are currently being analyzed and a
report on the district and the internal rate of return for the development proposal will be presented to
the Council prior to the public hearing. This action is to call a public hearing for July 26, 2010 to
consider this action. The Council is not, and cannot at this time, approve TIF for this project. This is
the start of the process to consider the issues related to the proposed project.
DISCUSSION
The Gladstone – Phase I improvements were approved without TIF involvement in the project. In
2007, the City Council reviewed a request from Bart Montaneri for TIF funding and Mr. Montaneri paid
for a Springsted analysis of his project. Springsted provided an analysis of the internal rate of return
for potential investors on that 2007 project and the City Council did not take a vote on the use of TIF
funds to be provided for that project and that developer; however, avote to call a public hearing to
discuss the TIF plan failedon a 2-2 vote. The developer, Mr. Montaneri,was unable to secure
financing with that plan and Mr. Montaneri was foreclosed on his purchase by Highland Bank and
Rand Financial. Rand Financial has cleared the property of liens and is prepared to finalize the
purchase of the property from Highland Bank.
This is the same development group that was working on the project in 2009 and was part of our effort
with the Metropolitan Council to indicate that our grant is tied to a potential development.
Unfortunately, the Metropolitan Council refused to give us further extensions and the grant was
released.
Packet Page Number 170 of 275
GLADSTONE – CALL TIF HEARING
PAGE TWO
Because the final development could not be establishedin December 2009, Maplewood was forced to
forfeit those grant funds of $1.8 million. The staff is working with the Metropolitan Council’s
Community Development Committee for a re-submission on that grant; however, no grant funds have
been secured in thisnext round of applications. Attached is a proposed public improvement plan that
would initiate Phase I of our Gladstone redevelopment in the amount of $5.8 million.
The developer would be responsible for $1.2 million of that project by agreeing to assessments. The
developer has requested TIF assistance from the project for these assessments and an additional
$0.7 million to make the project viable. It will be necessary for some bonding of the TIF to provide
project assessment payments. The developercould receive up to the entire $1.2 million in TIF
reimbursement for these assessments. These funds would help the City to achieve its goals to start
the Gladstone redevelopment. In exchange for this agreement, under this scenario, the developer
would receive up to theadditional $0.7million to use for land improvements for the development
project. The developer’s basis for the TIF is based on their following reasons:
1.Re-imbursement of the City’s redevelopment assessments.
2.Clearing costs for the removal of the mobile homes that were previously on the site were a cost
that this development group had to assume through the foreclosure process.
3.Due to the proximity of this site to Lake Phalen, the staff is requesting a high level of storm
water ponding and infiltration that add costs to the site improvements.
4.Increased trail improvements are provided on this site that enhancesthe walking areas.
5.The site plan requires dedication of land for the roundabout.
6.A sewer from the adjacent apartment complex runs through the property and must be re-
routed.
7.Preservation of a high number of trees on the property waspart of the original plan to maintain
a woodland feel for the project.
It may also be possible for the Council to expand some of the TIF district to allow some of the funds
[potentially up to 20%] to be used for other City initiatives. The staff continues to discuss this proposal
with the potential developer and the financial incentives necessary to meet the Metropolitan Council’s
grant requirements for thedevelopment. The TIF is being considered as incentive funds to the
developer to allow the grant funds to be received. The final analysis by Springsted will determine the
actual amount of funding available for Council consideration, although the developer has indicated that
without TIF funding, they cannot secure financing for their project and they would not proceed.
Discussion
Attached to this report is information on TIF Financing along with documents that were prepared for
the Gethsemane TIF Housing project. These are provided as information to inform the Council on the
process and information to be received on TIF during the next 2 months. Representatives from
Springsted will be present at the meeting to explain the process.
RECOMMENDATION
It isrecommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution that calls a Public Hearing on
July 26, 2010at 7:00 pm for the purpose of discussing the Tax Increment Financing District for The
Shores Development proposal.
Attachments:
1.Resolution
2.The Shores Financing Plan
3.TIF Timeline
4.TIF Concept Mechanics
5.Gethsemane TIF Information [2 documents]
Packet Page Number 171 of 275
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 172 of 275
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 173 of 275
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 174 of 275
Attachment 1
INSERT MAP
of Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment (Housing) Financing
District No. 1-10
Packet Page Number 175 of 275
Attachment 3
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK
,SYWMRK
(MWXVMGX2S
8LI7LSVIWSJ1ETPI[SSH4VSNIGX
8MQI7GLIHYPI
April - May 2010 Drafting of TIF Plan
746-2+78)(
Monday, May 10, 2010 City Council calls for public hearing for Monday, July 26
Or Monday, May 24, 2010 (resolution provided by )
&VMKKW
1SVKER
@ 7:00pm
On/Before June 11, 2010 County Commissioner receives notification letter
(sent by )
746-2+78)(
HE]WTVMSVXSTYFPMGEXMSRSJRSXMGISJTYFPMGLIEVMRK
On/Before June 18, 2010 County and School District receive impact letters &
draft TIF plan (sent by )
746-2+78)(
HE]WTVMSVXSTYFPMGLIEVMRK
Tuesday, July 6, 2010 City Planning Commission reviews TIF documents
Or Tuesday, July 20, 2010 (TIF documents provided by )
746-2+78)(
@ 7:00 pm (resolution provided by )
&VMKKW
1SVKER
Wednesday, July 14, 2010 Publication of notice of public hearing
(arrangements made by )
(IEHPMRI 8YI.YP]746-2+78)(
HE]WTVMSVXSTYFPMGLIEVMRK
Monday, July 26, 2010 City Council holds public hearing, and adopts resolution
@ 7:00 pm establishing TIF District (resolution provided by )
&VMKKW
1SVKER
After July 26, 2010 State filing and request for county certification
(completed by )
746-2+78)(
4/13/2010
Packet Page Number 177 of 275
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK
8-*
MR1MRRIWSXE
'SRGITXWERH1IGLERMGW
%TVMP
1MRRIWSXE3JJMGI'EPMJSVRME3JJMGI
'LIWETIEOI3JJMGI
'SVTSVEXI,IEHUYEVXIVW
28137 Espinoza
109 A Wimbledon Square
Mission Viejo, CA 92692
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
Chesapeake, VA 23320
949.600.5330
St. Paul, MN 55101-2887
757.422.1711
949.600.5325 Fax
651.223.3000
757.422.6617 Fax
651.223.3002 Fax
'SPSVEHS3JJMGI(IW1SMRIW3JJMGI1MWWSYVM3JJMGI
300 Walnut Street 9229 Ward Parkway
7400East Orchard Road
Suite 215 Suite 104
Suite 2500N
Des Moines, IA 50309-2258 Kansas City, MO 64114-3311
Greenwood Village, CO 80111
515.244.1358 816.333.7200
303.893.5800
816.333.6899 Fax
515.244.1508 Fax
303.771.1334 Fax
2SVXL'EVSPMRE3JJMGI6MGLQSRH3JJMGI;MWGSRWMR3JJMGI
1110 North Old World 3 Street
6762 Chauncey Drive 1564 East Parham Road
rd
Suite 218
Raliegh, NC 27615-6335 Richmond, VA 23228-2360
Milwaukee, WI 53203-1100
919.847.8769 804.726.9748
414.220.4250
804.726.9752 Fax 804.726.9752 Fax
414.220.4251 Fax
advisors@springsted.com www.springsted.com
Packet Page Number 178 of 275
Attachment 4
8EFPISJ'SRXIRXW
............................................................................................1
-2863(9'8-32
..................................................................................3
%4%68-'-4%287
................................................................................4
&8,)1)',%2-'7
Project Area
........................................................................................4
Types of Tax Increment Financing Districts
................................................5
Examples of TIF Eligible Project Costs
......................................................7
The Increment
.....................................................................................7
Financing of Project Costs
...................................................................10
Pooling
............................................................................................12
Time Restrictions
...............................................................................13
............................................................................14
'8,)(3'91)287
Development District Program
...............................................................14
Tax Increment Financing Plan
...............................................................14
Development Agreement
.....................................................................14
.......................................................15
(463')77*36)78%&0-7,1)28
.....................................................................16
)&)2)*-87%2('3787
City's Perspective
..............................................................................16
Landowner(s) Perspective
....................................................................17
.........................................................................18
*430-'=59)78-327
"But For” Test
....................................................................................18
Project Area
......................................................................................18
Level of Assistance
............................................................................19
Fiscal Disparities
................................................................................20
City Security Guarantees
.....................................................................23
City Administrative Costs
.....................................................................24
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 179 of 275
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
-RXVSHYGXMSR
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 180 of 275
Page 1
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 181 of 275
Page 2
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
%4EVXMGMTERXW
4EVXMGMTERXW
'MX]0ERHS[RIV(IZIPSTIV
Elected Officials Landowner or Developer
Advisory Commissions Attorney
City Staff
Fiscal Consultant:
Springsted Incorporated
Bond Counsel
3XLIV+SZIVRQIRXEP.YVMWHMGXMSRW
8-*(MWXVMGX4VSNIGX
County Federal Government
School District State Government
Other Taxing Jurisdictions Metropolitan Council, etc.
County
Other Municipalities
Bordering Project Area
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 182 of 275
Page 3
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
&8LI1IGLERMGW
4VSNIGX%VIE
MI(IZIPSTQIRX(MWXVMGX
ERH
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK
8-*
(MWXVMGX
Project Area
=
TIF District
TIF
DistrictProject Area
#1
TIF
District
#2
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 183 of 275
Page 4
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
8]TIWSJ8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK(MWXVMGXW
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 184 of 275
Page 5
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 185 of 275
Page 6
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
)\EQTPIWSJ8-*)PMKMFPI4VSNIGX'SWXW
8LI-RGVIQIRX
Estimated
Market
Value
EstimatedNet
MarketTax
ValueCapacity
- City
NetTaxProperty- County
TaxX Capacity =Taxes- School
CapacityRateDistrict
- Other
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 186 of 275
Page 7
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
TotalTotal Net Total
EstimatedTaxProperty
Market Value CapacityTaxes
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 187 of 275
Page 8
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 188 of 275
Page 9
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
*MRERGMRKSJ4VSNIGX'SWXW
“Private Business Use Test”
“Private Security Interest Test”
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 189 of 275
Page 10
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 190 of 275
Page 11
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
4SSPMRK
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 191 of 275
Page 12
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
8MQI6IWXVMGXMSRW
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 192 of 275
Page 13
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
'8LI(SGYQIRXW
(IZIPSTQIRX(MWXVMGX4VSKVEQ
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK4PER
(IZIPSTQIRX%KVIIQIRX
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 193 of 275
Page 14
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
(4VSGIWWJSV)WXEFPMWLQIRX
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 194 of 275
Page 15
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
)&IRIJMXWERH'SWXW
'MX] W4IVWTIGXMZI
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 195 of 275
Page 16
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
0ERHS[RIV
W
4IVWTIGXMZI
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 196 of 275
Page 17
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
*4SPMG]5YIWXMSRW
w&YX*SVx8IWX
4VSNIGX%VIE
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 197 of 275
Page 18
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
0IZIPSJ%WWMWXERGI
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 198 of 275
Page 19
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
*MWGEP(MWTEVMXMIW
8-*(MWXVMGX2IX8E\'ETEGMX]
;MXLSYX;MXL*MWGEP(MWTEVMXMIW'SRXVMFYXMSR
;MXLSYX;MXL
3TXMSR%
3TXMSR&
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 199 of 275
Page 20
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
;MXLSYX*MWGEP(MWTEVMXMIW'SRXVMFYXMSR
3TXMSR%
;MXL*MWGEP(MWTEVMXMIW'SRXVMFYXMSR
3TXMSR&
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 200 of 275
Page 21
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 201 of 275
Page 22
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
'MX]7IGYVMX]+YEVERXIIW
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 202 of 275
Page 23
Attachment 4
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRKMR1MRRIWSXE
'MX]%HQMRMWXVEXMZI'SWXW
635,1*67('
Packet Page Number 203 of 275
Page 24
Attachment 5
1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK4PER
JSV
8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK
,SYWMRK
(MWXVMGX2S
;MXLMR(IZIPSTQIRX(MWXVMGX2S
+IXLWIQERI7IRMSV,SYWMRK4VSNIGX
%TTVSZIH %YKYWX
4VITEVIHF]
746-2+78)(-2'36436%8)(
.EGOWSR7XVIIX7YMXI
7X4EYP12
Packet Page Number 204 of 275
Attachment 5
8%&0)3*'328)287
SectionPage(s)
A. Definitions................................................................................................................................................. 1
B. Statutory Authorization.............................................................................................................................. 1
C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose.................................................................................................... 1
D. Statement of Objectives............................................................................................................................ 1
E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Housing District..................................................... 1
F. Duration of the TIF District........................................................................................................................ 2
G. Property to be Included in the TIF District................................................................................................. 2
H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District................................................................................................. 2
I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District.............................................................. 3
J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing....................................................................................... 3
K. Estimated Public Costs............................................................................................................................. 4
L. Estimated Sources of Revenue................................................................................................................. 5
M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness............................................................................................. 5
N. Original Net Tax Capacity......................................................................................................................... 5
O. Original Tax Capacity Rate....................................................................................................................... 5
P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment......................................... 6
Q. Use of Tax Increment................................................................................................................................ 7
R. Excess Tax Increment............................................................................................................................... 7
S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five YearRule......................................................................................... 7
T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses...................................................................................................... 8
U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule..................................................... 8
V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions....................................................................................... 8
W. Prior Planned Improvements..................................................................................................................... 9
X. Development Agreements......................................................................................................................... 9
Y. Assessment Agreements.......................................................................................................................... 9
Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment FinancingPlan................................................................................... 10
AA.Administration of the Tax Increment FinancingPlan................................................................................. 10
AB. Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements.................................................................................... 11
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District....................................................................................... EXHIBIT I
Assumptions Report ......................................................................................................................….. EXHIBIT II
Projected Tax IncrementReport......................................................................................................... EXHIBIT III
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report...................................................................... EXHIBIT IV
Market Value Analysis Report............................................................................................................. EXHIBIT V
Packet Page Number 205 of 275
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
7IGXMSR%(IJMRMXMSRW
The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates
a different meaning:
"City" means the City of Maplewood, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality".
"City Council" means the City Council of the City of Maplewood; also referred to as the "Governing Body".
"County" means Ramsey County, Minnesota.
"Development District" means Municipal Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the
corresponding Development Program.
"Development Program" means the Development Program for the Development District.
"Project Area" means the geographic area of the Development District.
"School District" means Independent School District No. 622, Minnesota.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive.
"TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No. 1-9.
"TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document).
7IGXMSR&7XEXYXSV]%YXLSVM^EXMSR
See Section 1.3 of the Development Program for the Development District.
7IGXMSR'7XEXIQIRXSJ2IIHERH4YFPMG4YVTSWI
See Section 1.4 of the Development Program for the Development District.
7IGXMSR(7XEXIQIRXSJ3FNIGXMZIW
See Section 1.5 of the Development Program for the Development District.
7IGXMSR)(IWMKREXMSRSJ8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK(MWXVMGXEWE
,SYWMRK(MWXVMGX
Housing districts are a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a project intended for occupancy, in
part, by persons or families of low and moderate income.Low and moderate income is defined in federal, state, and
municipal legislation. A project does not qualify if the square footage of the improvements, constructed for uses other
than low and moderate income housing are more than 20% of the total square footage of all the planned
improvements.
In addition, housing districts are subject to various income limitations and requirements for residential property. For
owner occupied residential property, 95% of the housing units must be initially purchased and occupied by individuals
whose family income is less than or equal to the income requirements for qualified mortgage bond projects under
Page 1
Packet Page Number 206 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
section 143(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. For residential rental property, the property must satisfy the income
requirements for a qualified residential rental project as defined in section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The TIF District meets the above qualifications for these reasons:
1.The planned improvements consist of the following:
a.111 senior rental units, for which one of the following will apply:
at least 20% (23 units) of the rental units will be occupied by persons with incomes no greater than
o
50% of county median income,
at least 40% (44 units) of the rental units will be occupied by persons with incomes no greater than
o
60% of county median income,
2.No improvements are planned other than housing.
3.The City will require in the development agreement that the income limitations for owner-occupied units
apply to at least the initial buyers; and will require that the income limitations for all rental units apply for the
duration of the TIF District.
Tax increments derived from a housing district must be used solely to finance the cost of housing projects as defined
above. The cost of public improvements directly related to the housing projects and the allocated administrative
expenses of the Authority may be included in the cost of a housing project.
7IGXMSR*(YVEXMSRSJXLI8-*(MWXVMGX
Housing districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. Modifications of
this plan (see Section Z) shall not extend these limitations.
The City reserves the right to allow the TIF District to remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law, but
anticipates decertifying the district in 2020 (see Section P). If the District is in existence the maximum duration it will
be through the year 2035 if no increment is received in 2009, if increment is received in 2009 it will be through 2034.
All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the City.
7IGXMSR+4VSTIVX]XSFI-RGPYHIHMRXLI8-*(MWXVMGX
The TIF District is an approximately 10 acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the location
of the TIF District is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are described
below:
Parcel ID Number Legal Description
25-29-22-31-0032* Lot 1, Block 1, Gethsemane Addition
The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent
to the property described above.
*The property is in the process of being replatted, with approximately 4 of the total 10 acres to be used for parkland,
and new parcel ID numbers were not available at the time this TIF Plan was created. The legal description is
representative of the property following the re-platting
7IGXMSR,4VSTIVX]XSFI%GUYMVIHMRXLI8-*(MWXVMGX
Page 2
Packet Page Number 207 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
The City may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District. The City anticipates acquiring
approximately 4 of the total 10 acres for parkland, but no increment will be used for the acquisition of this land. The
City may use TIF to reimburse the Developer for land acquisition costs incurred.
7IGXMSR-7TIGMJMG(IZIPSTQIRX)\TIGXIHXS3GGYV;MXLMRXLI8-*(MWXVMGX
The proposed development is expected to consist of a 111-unit senior housing facility including independent living,
assisted living, and memory care units. The proposed breakdown of units is as follows, 32 assisted living units, 18
memory care units and 61 independent living units, of the 61 independent units 23 (20% of total units) are proposed
to be reserved for persons of low and moderate income.The development will also include a “town center” common
area, dining facility, day care and an underground parking garage, and is proposed to be constructed on 6 of the total
10 acres. The remaining 4 acres of the development site is proposed to be used by the City for parkland, with no tax
increment being expended on the acquisition or development of the park site.
The City anticipates using tax increment to finance a portion of the land acquisition and site improvement costs
associated with the development, as well as related administrative expenses.
Construction on the project is expected to being in 2009 and be fully completed in 2010. The project will be 100%
assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2011 for taxes payable in 2012.
At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contracts with regards to the above
described development.
7IGXMSR.*MRHMRKWERH2IIHJSV8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK
In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings:
(1) The TIF District qualifies as a housing district;
See Section E of this document for the reasons and facts supporting this finding.
(2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future.
The proposed development is a senior rental housing project consisting of up to 111 assisted living,
memory care and independent living units in the City of Maplewood. The City has reviewed
information submitted by the proposed developer, showing that the cost of providing low to
moderate income housing makes the proposed development infeasible without public financial
assistance. Without the improvements the City has no reason to expect that significant
development of this type would occur without assistance similar to that provided in this plan.
Therefore the City has no reason to believe the development would not occur but-for tax increment
assistance.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use
of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from
the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for
the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan:Without the improvements the
City has no reason to expect that significant redevelopment would occur without assistance similar
to that provided in this plan. Therefore, the City concludes as follows:
a.The city’s estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase
without the use of tax increment financing is $0 (except for a small amount for annual
appreciation of land value).
Page 3
Packet Page Number 208 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
b.If all development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the
District, the total increase in market value would be approximately $17,979,738.
c.The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $1,312,227. (See Exhibit VI)
d.Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the
Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase
greater than $16,667,511 (the amount in clause b less the amounts in clauses a and c) without
tax increment assistance.
The comparative analysis outlined above of the estimated market values both with and
without establishment of the TIF District and the use of tax increments assumes no
development will occur on the site because of the extraordinary costs associated with
constructing affordable housing units. We assume the estimated market value without
creation of the district would only increase at most by an incremental inflationary amount.
The increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated
subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of
the TIF District and the use of tax increments.
(3) The TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City as a
whole; and
The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the TIF District is properly zoned,
and the TIF Plan has been approved by the City Planning Commission and will generally
complement and serve to implement policies adopted in the City's comprehensive plan.
(4) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise.
The reasons and facts supporting this finding are that the development activities are
necessary so that development and redevelopment by private enterprise can occur within
the Project Area.
7IGXMSR/)WXMQEXIH4YFPMG'SWXW
The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax
increments of the TIF District.
Land/Building acquisition, Site
Improvements/Preparation Costs, and other $1,008,776
Eligible Improvements
Bond principal payments 0
Bond interest payments 0
Loan Principal payments 0
Loan Interest payments 0
Pooling for Affordable Housing 911,365
Administrative expenses 213,350
Total $2,133,491
The City reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate
additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased.
Page 4
Packet Page Number 209 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
7IGXMSR0)WXMQEXIH7SYVGIWSJ6IZIRYI
Tax Increment revenue $2,133,491
Interest on invested funds 0
Bond proceeds 0
Loan proceeds 0
Grants 0
Other 0
Total $2,133,491
The City anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay-as-you-go
technique. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be
distributed to the developer/owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred (see Section K).
The City reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance,
internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The City
also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs
including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income.
7IGXMSR1)WXMQEXIH%QSYRXSJ&SRHIH-RHIFXIHRIWW
The Authority does not anticipate issuing tax increment bonds to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District,
but reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,133,491.
7IGXMSR23VMKMREP2IX8E\'ETEGMX]
The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net
tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified
between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts
certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year.
The Estimated Market Value of all property within the TIF District as of January 2, 2008, for taxes payable in 2009, is
$1,212,900, but the property is classified as exempt. Upon establishment of the TIF District, and subsequent
reassessment and reclassification of the property to rental, it is estimated that the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District will be approximately $15,956, based on an EMV of $1,276,500 as set by the sale price of the property.
Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as
a result of:
(1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property;
(2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District;
(3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or
(4) changes in property classification rates.
7IGXMSR33VMKMREP8E\'ETEGMX]6EXI
Page 5
Packet Page Number 210 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
The County Auditor shall also certify the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all
local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District.This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the
original net tax capacity.
In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of (a) the
sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District.
At the time this document was prepared, the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for
taxes levied in 2008 and payable in 2009, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County
Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tax
increment generated by the TIF District, the final local tax rates for taxes levied in 2007 and payable in 2008, is
95.896% as shown below.
Final
2007/2008
Taxing JurisdictionLocal Tax Rate
City of Maplewood 30.800%
Ramsey County 44.023%
ISD # 622 20.426%
Other 7.979%
Total 103.228%
7IGXMSR44VSNIGXIH6IXEMRIH'ETXYVIH2IX8E\'ETEGMX]ERH
4VSNIGXIH8E\-RGVIQIRX
The City anticipates that the project will be completed by December 31, 2010, creating a maximum total tax capacity
for TIF District No. 30 of $184,479 as of January 2, 2011. The captured tax capacity as of that date is estimated to be
$168,523 and the first full year of tax increment is estimated to be $173,998 payable in 2012. A complete schedule of
estimated increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit III.
The estimates shown in this TIF Plan assume that the housing development will be designated as rental property, and
that the class rate will be 1.25%, and assume 3% annual increases in market values.
Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the
extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall certify to the City the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The City may choose
to retain any or all of this amount. It is the City’s intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF
District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Exhibit II gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits
contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit III which shows the projected tax increment generated over the
anticipated life of the TIF District.
7IGXMSR59WISJ8E\-RGVIQIRX
Page 6
Packet Page Number 211 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay
such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of
financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit III shows the
projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District.
The City has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of
the following purposes:
(1) Pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative
costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T);
(2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated
public costs of the TIF District;
(3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to
finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District;
(4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S.
Section 469.175, Subdivision 1a; or
(5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School
District.
Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project
located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be
used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City.
Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a
building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any
other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park, or a
facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or
renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes.
7IGXMSR6)\GIWW8E\-RGVIQIRX
In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated
public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the City shall use the excess tax increments to:
(1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds;
(2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof;
(3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or
(4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and School
District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any
excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution.
7IGXMSR78E\-RGVIQIRX4SSPMRKERHXLI*MZI=IEV6YPI
As permitted under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763, subdivision 2(b) and subdivision 3(a)(5), any expenditures
of increment from the TIF District to pay the cost of a “housing project” as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, subd. 11 will be treated as an expenditure within the district for the purposes of the “pooling rules” and the
Page 7
Packet Page Number 212 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
“five year rule”. The City does not currently anticipate that tax increments will be spent outside the TIF District
(except allowable administrative expenses), but such expenditures are expressly authorized in this TIF Plan.
7IGXMSR80MQMXEXMSRSR%HQMRMWXVEXMZI)\TIRWIW
Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the City other than:
(1) amounts paid for the purchase of land;
(2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly
connected with the proposed development within the TIF District;
(3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons or businesses residing or located
within the TIF District; or
(4) amounts used to pay interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount, tax increment bonds.
Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or
economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax
increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total
estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increment expenditures for the project.
7IGXMSR90MQMXEXMSRSR4VSTIVX]2SX7YFNIGXXS-QTVSZIQIRXW*SYV=IEV6YPI
If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified
improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall
be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified
improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial
reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The City must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the
fifth year, evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District.
If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the
above activities, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity has commenced and the parcel shall
once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify the net tax capacity of the parcel, as most
recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District.
7IGXMSR:)WXMQEXIH-QTEGXSR3XLIV8E\MRK.YVMWHMGXMSRW
Exhibit IV shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City believes that there
will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed
development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public
assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the
development therein becomes part of the general tax base.
The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2, are listed below.
1.The total maximum amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the district is estimated to
be $2,141,198.
Page 8
Packet Page Number 213 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
2.To the extent the housing project in the proposed TIF District generates any public cost impacts on city-
provided services such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and borrowing costs attributable to
the district, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion
captured by the District.
3.The maximum amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school
district levies, assuming the school district’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions
remained the same, is estimated to be $423,684.
4.The maximum amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county
levies, assuming the county’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is
estimated to be $913,143.
5.No additional information has been requested by the County or School District.
7IGXMSR;4VMSV4PERRIH-QTVSZIQIRXW
The City shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a
listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months
immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the
TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued.
There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the
TIF District.
7IGXMSR<(IZIPSTQIRX%KVIIQIRXW
If within a project containing a housing district, more than 10% of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the
City is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged), then prior
to such acquisition, the City must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement
must provide recourse for the City should the development not be completed.
The City anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring any property
located within the TIF District.
7IGXMSR=%WWIWWQIRX%KVIIQIRXW
The City may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the
developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of
the TIF District.
The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and
specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and
so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate,
shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the
office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature
termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District.
The City does not anticipate entering into an assessment agreement.
Page 9
Packet Page Number 214 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
7IGXMSR>1SHMJMGEXMSRWSJXLI8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK4PER
Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; increase in the amount of
bonded indebtedness to be incurred; increase in the amount of capitalized interest; increase in that portion of the
captured net tax capacity to be retained by the City; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of
additional property to be acquired by the City shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements
for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if:
(1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and
(2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of
those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City agrees that the TIF District's
original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels
eliminated.
The City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF
District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of
certification.
7IGXMSR%%%HQMRMWXVEXMSRSJXLI8E\-RGVIQIRX*MRERGMRK4PER
Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the City shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue.
The City shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the
TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the City shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution
establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The City
shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and
improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment
agreement as reasonable.
The County shall distribute to the City the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax
increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of
the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other
development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering and
implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis:
(1) prior to July 1, the City shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred
in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely
manner.
(2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification of
an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates
for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to
determine local tax rates in subsequent years.
(3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following:
(a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the
original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply;
(b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of
the TIF District;
(c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of
estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting increase
Page 10
Packet Page Number 215 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
'MX]SJ1ETPI[SSH1MRRIWSXE
or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax
capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall notify the City of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District.
7IGXMSR%&*MRERGMEP6ITSVXMRKERH(MWGPSWYVI6IUYMVIQIRXW
The City will file the TIF Plan, and any subsequent amendments thereto, with the Commissioner of Revenue and the
Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4A. The City will comply
with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivisions 5 and 6.
Page 11
Packet Page Number 216 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
Exhibit I
Map of Proposed TIF Plan within Development District
Page 12
Packet Page Number 217 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
Exhibit II
Assumptions Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing(Housing) District No.
Gethsemane Sr. Housing Project
Scenario C - $130,041 per unit value, 100% of Costs, 3% Inflator
Type of Tax Increment Financing DistrictHousing
Maximum Duration of TIF District25 years from 1st increment
Projected Certification Request Date06/30/08
Decertification Date12/31/35 (11 Years of Increment)
2007/2008
Base Estimated Market Value$1,276,500
Original Net Tax Capacity$15,956
Assessment/Collection Year
2008/20092009/20102010/20112011/2012
Base Estimated Market Value$1,276,500$1,276,500$1,276,500$1,276,500
Increase in Estimated Market Value009,516,86613,481,803
Total Estimated Market Value1,276,5001,276,50010,793,36614,758,303
Total Net Tax Capacity$15,956$15,956$134,917$184,479
City of Maplewood30.735%
Ramsey County44.134%
ISD #62220.404%
Other7.976%
Local Tax Capacity Rate103.249%2007/2008
Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District0.0000%
Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10%)10.00%
Pooling Percent0.00%
Note (Pay-As-You-Go)
Bonds
Bonds Dated06/30/08Note Dated06/30/08
Bond Issue @ 0.00% (NIC)$0Note Rate6.00%
Eligible Project Costs$0Note Amount$0
Present Value Date & Rate06/30/086.00%
Notes
Projections assume no future changes to tax and class rates, and assumes a 3% market value inflator
Base EMV of $1,276,500 is equal to land acquisition cost
Page 13
Packet Page Number 218 of 275
746-2+78)(
Attachment 5
Exhibit Exhibit V
Market Value Analysis Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No.
Gethsemane Sr. Housing Project
Scenario C - $130,041 per unit value, 100% of Costs, 3% Inflator
Assumptions
Present Value Date06/30/08
P.V. Rate - Gross T.I.6.00%
Increase in EMV With TIF District$17,979,738
Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment1,312,227
Subtotal$16,667,511
Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF0
Difference$16,667,511
AnnualPresent
Gross TaxValue @
Year Increment6.00%
1201000
22011122,826101,619
32012173,998135,808
42013179,712132,328
52014185,598128,926
62015191,660125,601
72016197,904122,352
82017204,335119,177
92018210,959116,076
102019217,782113,047
112020224,810110,090
122021232,049107,203
13202200
14202300
15202400
16202500
17202600
18202700
19202800
20202900
21203000
22203100
23203200
24203300
25203400
26203500
$2,141,633$1,312,227
Page 18
746-2+78)(
Packet Page Number 221 of 275
Attachment 5
Springsted Incorporated
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2887
Tel: 651-223-3000
Fax: 651-223-3002
www.springsted.com
MEMORANDUM
TO:Chuck Ahl, Acting City Manager
FROM:Paul T. Steinman, Vice President/Consultant
Tom Denaway, Analyst
DATE:August 20, 2008
SUBJECT: Gethsemane TIF Senior Housing Project
&EGOKVSYRH
Gethsemane Senior Housing Inc. has submitted a development proposal to the City for the construction of a 111-unit
senior housing facility including independent living, assisted living and memory care units. The development
proposal included a request for assistance from Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to offset costs associated with the
development of the site and the creation of affordable housing units. The proposed TIF District would be a Housing
TIF District, which would require that either 20% of the rental units (23 units of the proposed 111) be occupied by
persons with incomes not greater than 50% of the county median income, or that 40% of the units (44 units) be
occupied by persons with incomes not greater than 60% of the county median income. The units reserved for
persons of low and moderate income would be from the independent living units. The Developer has indicated they
plan to meet the 20% requirement.
4VSNIGX3ZIVZMI[
The proposed development is to be situated on 10 acres of land immediately south of Gethsemane Lutheran Church
and School. Approximately 4 of the 10 acres may be utilized as parkland. The developer estimates the total cost of
the project to be $18.6M with the following sources and uses:
7SYVGIWSJ*YRHW8SXEP9WIWSJ*YRHW8SXEP
First Mortgage Amount 17,185,650 Land Acquisition 1,276,500
Equity 1,500,000 Hard Costs (Construction) 13,158,002
SoftCosts 1,989,330
Finance Costs 1,733,595
Development Fee528,223
Total18,685,650 Total18,685,650
Packet Page Number 222 of 275
Attachment 5
City of Maplewood
Gethsemane TIF Senior Housing Project
8/20/2008
Page 2
Springsted has reviewed the Developer’s projected construction costs and finds them to be reasonable and inline
with the current market. Based on the proposed level of construction we have estimated a post-development market
value for the site of $15,711,002. The market value consists of $1,276,500 in land value and $14,434,502 in building
value. It is estimated that the building will be 75% constructed in 2009, with the remaining value constructed in 2010.
This would create a first receipt of tax increment for taxes payable 2011, with 2012 being the first full year of tax
increment.
The development property is currently tax-exempt and providing no property tax revenue to the taxing jurisdictions.
At the time the land is sold the property classification will change to taxable, and the base value will be set by the
sale price. This means the District will have a proposed base value of $1,276,500, with value growth above this
amount generating tax increment revenue. Taxes paid on the base value of the site are not considered TIF revenue,
and will be distributed to the taxing jurisdictions accordingly. As a result, the City is estimated to receive non-TIF
property tax revenues of approximately $5,000 annually to the City’s general fund, based on the addition of
$1,276,500 to the City’s total market value.
8E\-RGVIQIRX6IUYIWXERH&YX*SV%REP]WMW
Springsted performed a detailed review of the Developer’s operating pro-forma to determine the need for TIF
assistance and if the but-for test was being met. The but-for test is used to determine whether or not a project would
proceed as proposed without the use of public dollars, as TIF can only be used after it has been determined that the
project would not proceed but-for the use of tax increment. In order to perform this analysis we examined two 10-
year rental project pro-formas, one showing a result if the developer receives the subsidy and one showing a result if
the developer does not receive a subsidy. If the operating pro-forma without assistance shows a reasonable rate of
return or otherwise indicates the development scenario is financially feasible without the assistance, then it cannot be
determined that the project would not proceed without assistance; however, if the operating pro-forma without
assistance is not financially feasible and the operating pro-forma with assistance is feasible, than it can be
determined that the project would not likely occur but-for the use of TIF.
In reviewing the Gethsemane proposal it was determined that the project was not financially feasible without
assistance due to a debt service coverage ratio (DSR) below the required level. The DSR is a ratio used to
determine the percentage of annual debt payments that are covered by the operating income. While the project
without assistance has a positive cash flow, the DSR without assistance does not provide enough coverage to attract
private financing. The project with assistance creates a DSR suitable for the project to be financially feasible.
Based on the results of this analysis an alternative proposal was prepared by the City, and agreed to by the
Developer. The alternative proposal reduced the length of TIF assistance from 26 years to 10 years, reduced the
amount of TIF from $5.96M to $1M, and gradually reduces the percentage of annual TIF provided to the Developer.
The Developer will receive 90% of the generated TIF revenue annually for the first four years, with this percentage
declining from 81% to 5% in the remaining six years of the District. The declining TIF reimbursement amount will
Packet Page Number 223 of 275
Attachment 5
City of Maplewood
Gethsemane TIF Senior Housing Project
8/20/2008
Page 3
enable the City to generate additional Tax Increment Revenue that will be available for pooling to help offset deficits
in other City TIF Districts; while still creating 10-years of affordable housing for low and moderate income seniors.
This proposal provides the necessary assistance for the project to be feasible, while also reducing the duration of the
District and amount of TIF assistance provided by the City.
7SYVGIWERH9WIWSJ8E\-RGVIQIRX6IZIRYI
Tax Increment revenue can only be used to reimburse eligible and documented expenditures incurred by the
Developer during the construction of the project. Expenditures related to the acquisition of land, improvements and
site preparation costs, and the installation of public utilities are examples of costs eligible to be reimbursed from TIF.
As noted above, only costs that are documented as being incurred are eligible for reimbursement.
)WXMQEXIH4YFPMG'SWXW
Land/building acquisition, Site $1,008,776
improvements/preparation costs, and other
eligible costs
Bond interest payments 0
Loan principal payments 0
Loan/note interest payments 0
Administrative expenses 213,350
Capitalized interest 0
Other (eligible TIF pooling activities) 911,365
8SXEP
)WXMQEXIH7SYVGIWSJ6IZIRYI
Tax increment revenue $2,133,491
Interest on invested funds 0
Bond proceeds 0
Loan proceeds 0
Grants0
Other0
8SXEP
TIF assistance will be provided to the Developer on a pay-as-you-go basis, meaning the Developer will provide up-
front financing for all costs related to the construction of the development. As TIF revenue is generated the
Developer will be reimbursed for a portion of these costs over the duration of the District. The primary benefit, to the
City, of this type of financing is that it puts the risk on the Developer. If actual TIF revenues are lower than projected,
the City is not adversely affected. With pay-as-you-go financing the Developer is reimbursed annually with a portion
of the TIF revenue they generate. In this particular case the reimbursement will be provided over the course of ten
years, with the percentage of the reimbursement declining over the final six years of the development. A chart
showing the reimbursement percentage is below.
Packet Page Number 224 of 275
Attachment 5
City of Maplewood
Gethsemane TIF Senior Housing Project
8/20/2008
Page 4
201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
TIF Reimbursement(110,146(156,035)(161,15(166,43(140,0(110,00(80,00(50,(25,(10)8)7)00)0)0)000)000),000)
% of Available TIF90%90%90%90%81%62%44%26%13%5%
Debt Coverage Ratio
1.261.311.351.391.401.411.421.421.441.47
IRR Calculation
15.13%
The declining percentages in the final six years, provides the City with the opportunity to pool TIF funds to other
existing City TIF Districts. The TIF Plan budget currently includes administrative expenses of $213,350 and pooling
expenses of $911,365. Administrative expenses are limited to an amount equal to 10% of the expenses of the TIF
District, any TIF revenue captured by the City that is not used for Developer reimbursement or administrative costs is
eligible to be used for pooling. The amount eligible for pooling is typically limited to 20% of actual TIF revenues, but
State Statute has a special provision for instances where pooling is used for the creation of affordable housing. If
pooling is used for affordable housing purposes it is considered an “in-district” expenditure and therefore does not
count against the 20% pooling limit. Pooling from the Gethsemane TIF District to any of the City’s other Housing TIF
Districts, would be considered as supporting the creation of affordable housing and would not count against the 20%
pooling limit.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to the City of Maplewood. Please contact either Tom Denaway or
Paul Steinman at (651) 223-3000 with any questions or comments.
Packet Page Number 225 of 275
Agenda Item J1
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
James Antonen, City Manager
FROM:
Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
Jon Jarosch, Civil Engineer I
SUBJECT: White Bear Avenue/County Road D Improvements, Project 08-13
a. Resolution of Concurrence with Ramsey County for Award of Bid
b. Approval of Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreements with Ramsey
County (White Bear Avenue at County Road D, White Bear Avenue at
Woodlynn Avenue, White Bear Avenue at Lydia Avenue, and White
Bear Avenue at Beam Avenue)
c. Approval of Cooperative Agreement (PW 2010-02) with Ramsey County
DATE:
May 14, 2010
INTRODUCTION
Final plans and specifications for the White Bear Avenue/County Road D Improvements (White Bear
Avenue Portion), City Project 08-13, were approved by the city council on March 22, 2010 and council
authorization was given to Ramsey County for advertising and bidding the project. Those bids were
received and read aloud on May 12, 2010. In order for Ramsey County to award the project,
concurrence from Maplewood is needed.
The council should consider approval of four traffic control signal maintenance agreements with
Ramsey County. The council should also consider approving a cooperative agreement with Ramsey
County for the White Bear Avenue Improvements. The agreement outlines the financial obligations of
the two entities for this project which is focused on White Bear Avenue between County Road D and
Radatz Avenue.
DISCUSSION
A summary of the bids received for this project can be seen in Table 1 below.
TABLE 1: BID SUMMARY
1 Eureka Construction, Inc. $9,495,001.26
2 Shafer Contracting Co. $9,880,135.34
3 Max Steininger, Inc. $11,100,000.00
Engineer’s Estimate $10,133,171.55
All bids have been checked and tabulated. The engineer’s estimate for the work has been provided on
the bottom row of Table 1 for comparison.
The low bid from Eureka Construction, Inc. of $9,495,001.26 is approximately 6% less than the
engineer’s cost estimate. The low bid prices reflect the continuing competitive nature in the
construction market.
Packet Page Number 226 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Four (4) traffic signals are being modified as part of the White Bear Avenue improvements. These
signals are located at White Bear Avenue and County Road D, White Bear Avenue and Woodlynn
Avenue, White Bear Avenue and Lydia Avenue, and at White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue. The
City of Maplewood needs to enter into a maintenance agreement with Ramsey County for these
signals. The agreement is for the maintenance of the traffic control signal system which includes street
lights, signs, and emergency vehicle pre-emption. The attached maintenance agreements define the
obligations of both the city and of the County, similar to past practices.
BUDGET
Federal funding represents the major share of project funding; with the remaining costs split between
the County and City as stipulated in the joint-powers agreement. The funding sources are in
accordance with those established at the public hearing and no budget adjustments are required at this
time. Due to the continued competitive nature of the construction market any savings from the low bid
prices will be distributed as outlined in the cooperative agreement.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council:
a. Approve the attached Resolution of Concurrence with Ramsey County for Award of Bid for the
White Bear Avenue/County Road D Improvements (White Bear Avenue Portion), City Project
08-13.
b. Approve the attached Traffic signal maintenance agreements with Ramsey County for the
signals at the intersections of White Bear Avenue and County Road D, White Bear Avenue and
Woodlynn Avenue, White Bear Avenue and Lydia Avenue, and at White Bear Avenue and
Beam Avenue and direct the Mayor and city manager to sign the agreements signifying council
approval. Minor revisions as approved by the city attorney are authorized as needed for the
agreements.
c. Approve the attached Cooperative Agreement (PW 2010-02) for the White Bear
Avenue/County Road D Improvements (White Bear Avenue Portion), City Project 08-13 with
Ramsey County, and direct the Mayor and city manager to sign the agreement signifying
council approval. Minor modifications as approved by the city attorney are authorized as
needed for the agreement.
Attachments:
1. Resolution: Concurrence for Award of Bid
2. Maintenance Agreement PW2010 –03 (White Bear Avenue and County Road D)
3. Maintenance Agreement PW2010 –04 (White Bear Avenue and Woodlynn Avenue)
4. Maintenance Agreement PW2010 –05 (White Bear Avenue and Lydia Avenue)
5. Maintenance Agreement PW2010 –06 (White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue)
6. Cooperative Agreement PW 2010-02
7. Location Map
Packet Page Number 227 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION
CONCURRENCE FOR AWARD OF BID
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the
bid of Eureka Construction, Inc. in the amount of $9,495,001.26 is the lowest responsible bid
for the construction of the White Bear Avenue Improvements (White Bear Avenue portion) –
City Project 08-13, and per the cooperative agreement between Ramsey County and the City
of Maplewood (Agreement PW 2010-02), the City of Maplewood, through this resolution, is
signifying concurrence in order for Ramsey County to enter into a construction contract with
Eureka Construction, Inc. for said improvements.
Adopted by the council this 24th day of May 2010.
Packet Page Number 228 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 2
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE
OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
AGREEMENT NO. PW 2010-03
14
Packet Page Number 229 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 2
24
Packet Page Number 230 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 2
34
Packet Page Number 231 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 2
RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MN
44
Packet Page Number 232 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE
OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
AGREEMENT NO. PW 2010-04
14
Packet Page Number 233 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
24
Packet Page Number 234 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
34
Packet Page Number 235 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 3
RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MN
44
Packet Page Number 236 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 4
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE
OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
AGREEMENT NO. PW 2010-05
14
Packet Page Number 237 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 4
24
Packet Page Number 238 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 4
34
Packet Page Number 239 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 4
RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MN
44
Packet Page Number 240 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 5
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE
OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS
AGREEMENT NO. PW 2010-06
14
Packet Page Number 241 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 5
24
Packet Page Number 242 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 5
34
Packet Page Number 243 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 5
RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MN
44
Packet Page Number 244 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
RAMSEY COUNTY
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
WITH CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Packet Page Number 245 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 246 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 247 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 248 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 249 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 250 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 251 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 252 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6
Packet Page Number 253 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 254 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 255 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 256 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 257 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 258 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 259 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 260 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 261 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 262 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 263 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 264 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 265 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 266 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 267 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 268 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 269 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 270 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 6 (Exhibits)
Packet Page Number 271 of 275
Agenda Item J1
Attachment 7
Packet Page Number 272 of 275
Agenda Item J2
AGENDA REPORT
TO
: City Manager, Jim Antonen
FROM:
H. Alan Kantrud, City Attorney; Police Chief David Thomalla
SUBJECT: ConsiderOrdinance Prohibiting Conduct Related to Motor Vehicles
DATE:May 17, 2010
INTRODUCTION
Recently the Police approached staff and advised that there has been an up-tick in behavior that
includes: riding on car hoods, leaning into vehicles while be operated, leaning more than arms out of
moving vehicle, &ct. The State has criminalized some activity like this,but the Police would like to
have a local ordinance addressing this conduct.
DISCUSSION
State law addresses driving conduct on the part of drivers: careless, reckless, drunken, and other
driving.
infractions that relate to The State does not address much in the way of conduct of
passengers, however. By criminalizing conduct relative to passengers and people near-by interacting
with vehicles, police will be able to cite for these observations. Other cities, most notably Saint Paul
and North Saint Paul,have similar ordinances. The addition of the language to the Maplewood City
Code will provide continuous coverage of this conduct from Saint Paul out to White Bear Lake.
not
It is important to note that this Ordinance would lead to people being ticketedfor signaling, waving,
or travelling in a motor vehicle with an arm resting on a sill of a rolled-down window, but is designed to
give police the discretion to cite for obviously dangerous or reckless conduct relative to motor vehicles.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends passage of the language presented here in the form of a first reading of an
Ordinance. In the alternative please advise as to any modifications you would like to see.
Attachments:
Proposed Ordinance to be added to City Code Section 38
1.
Packet Page Number 273 of 275
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE RIDING UPON THE EXTERNAL PORTION OF
VEHICLES; CLINGING TO MOVING VEHICLES; AND UNLAWFULLY EXTENDING BODY
PARTS BEYOND THE INTERIOR LIMITS OF MOVING VEHICLES
WHEREAS, The City of Maplewood is aware and concerned about unsafe operation of motor vehicles,
specifically, the riding upon moving vehicles, allowing passengers to extend body parts outside of the
interior of them or hang onto them to from the outside while in motion and,
WHEREAS, The City Council believes it is in the best interest of the Public and the citizens of
Maplewood that the conduct described above be prohibited and,
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has not prohibited the conduct described above and
WHEREAS, the City may prohibit the conduct described above by Ordinance pursuant to its authority.
NOW, Therefore it here by ordained that:
The Maplewood City Code be expanded to include § 36-40 which shall read:
Sec. 36-40 Certain acts prohibited.
No person shall ride upon the external portion of any motor vehicle while in
operation, alight from or board any motor vehicle while in operation, extend any portion of
the body from the interiorof the vehicle, nor intend any portion of the body intothe interior
thereof while in operation. A driver may signal by hand as authorized by law and this
section is not applicable to emergency vehicle drivers.
Packet Page Number 274 of 275
Item L1
Memorandum
To:City Manager Antonen
From: Karen Guilfoile, Director Citizen Services
Re: Award of Bid for Maplewood Monthly and Maplewood Seasons
Date:May 18, 2010
Introduction
At the April 26, 2010 city council meeting, council approved a Request for
Proposal (hereafter RFP) for printing and postage for the Maplewood Monthly
and the Maplewood Seasons. The RFP was sent to numerous printers in the
metro and surrounding areas and an Advertisement for Bid was published in the
Lillie News on May 5, 2010. The RFP bid was to cover the time period of July
2010 through December 2012.
Major details of the bid specifications include printing and mailing services for the
following:
Printing of theMaplewood Monthly 30times (6 times in 2010, 12times in
2011 and 12times in 2012). Fifteen issues of 12 pages, 12 issues of 16
pages and 3 issues of 20 pages with 18,500 copies printedeach time.
Printing of the Maplewood Seasons10times (2 times in 2010, 4 times in
2011 and 4 times in 2012) and inserted into the Maplewood Monthly.
Each issue will consist of 4 pages with 18,500 copies printed each time.
Background
Bids were received from the following and opened on May 17, 2010.
Nystrom Publishing Company, Inc. $159,268.86
Lillie Newspaper $351,000.00
Recommendation
After review of the bids, it is recommendedthat the bid be awarded to Nystrom
Publishing Company, Inc. in the amount of $159,268.86.
Packet Page Number 275 of 275