HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.08.85 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, April 8, 1985
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 85-07
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to orderat 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Greavu.
B. ROLL CALL
John C. Greavu, Mayor Present
Norman G. Anderson, Councilmember Present
Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present
Mary Lee Maida, Councilmember Present
_ Michael T. wasiluk, Councilmember Absent
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting No. 85-03 (February 11, 1985)
a. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85-03
(February 11, 1985).
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
2. Minutes of Meeting No. 85-04 (February 25, 1985)
a. Councilmember Maida moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 85-04
(February 25, 1985) as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Greavu moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
1. City Hall
2. Golf Ordinance
3. Revenue Sharing
4. Assessment Appeal
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
-~;j E. CONSENT AGENDA r,
Councilmember Bastian moved, Seconded by Councilmember Maida, Ayes - all to approve
the Consent Agenda Items 1 and 2 as recommended:
1. Accounts Payable
Approved the accounts,(Part I - Fees, Services, Expenses check register
dated March 27, 1985, through March 29, 1985 - $385,159.42 Part II -
Payroll Check dated March 22, 1985 - $66,030.15) in the amount of $451,189.57.
4/08
2. Western State Bank Water Connection
Resolution No. 85 - 4 - 48
WHEREAS, Western State Bank desires to build '.on Rice Street north of
Larpehteur Avenue;
WHEREAS, the City of Paplewood cannot provide water service to the site;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, CITY COUNCIL
that the City of Roseville is requestedto provide water service to the
proposed Western State Bank site.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. - Conditional Use Permit Revision 1810 East County Road B (FUlk)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request
of Roger R. Fulk, 1810 E. County Road B for renewal of the conditional use .permit
to change the starting time from 8:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.P4.
b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
c. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
d. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 49
- WHEREAS, Roger R. Fulk initiated a conditional use permit to construct
two manufacturing buildings within 200 feet of a residential district at the
following-described property:
The East 250 feet of the west 533 feet of the north 33 feet of
the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22,
subject to roads
This property is also known as 1810 E. County Road B, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of thsconditional use permit is as
follows:
1. This conditional use permit was approved by the Maplewood City
- Council on February 13, 1984, subject to:
a. The hours of operation shall generally be between 8 a.m.
and 5 p.m.
b. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors.
c. All fire safety regulations shall be met.
- 2 - 4/08
d. All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall
be removed from the premises.
e. This permit shall be reviewed in one year from the date of
this approval.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered the conditional use permit renewal
on April 8th, 1985. The Council also considered reports and recommenda-
tions of the City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described conditional use permit be amended on the basis of the following findings-
of-fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with
the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental
to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be
compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present.
and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run-off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking
needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as
streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public
cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental
to the welfare of the City.
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
",j Approval is subject to tlae following conditions:
1. The hours of operation shall generally be between 7 a.m. and S p.m.
2. All equipment and machinery shall be stored indoors.
3. All fire safety regulations shall be met.
4. All junk vehicles and any other miscellaneous debris shall be removed
from the premises.
- 3 - 4/08
5. This permit shall bereviewed in three months from the date of this
renewal.
6. Adherenceto the site plan, dated January 6, 1984, unless a change is
approved by the City's Community Design Review Board.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
- 2. 7:10 P.M., Rezoning - 1809-1821 English Street (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal.
to rezone 1809 - 1821 English Street from M-1 Light Danufacturing to R-3 Multiple
Dwelling.
- b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Robert Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavucalled for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 50
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from M-l, light
manufacturing to R-3,.residence district (multiple dwelling) for the follow-
ing described property: _
Lot one through eight, block one and alley accruing thereto, W. H.
Fisher's Addition to Gladstone.
This property is also known as 1809 and 1821 English Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 4, 1985. The PlanningCommission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be approved.
d
3. The Maplewood City Council held apublic hearing on April 8th, 1985,
to`consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Plan-
, ning Commission.,
- 4 - 4/08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
- of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code and the comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the
area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safe-
guarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facili-
ties, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and
schools.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
- G. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Paramedic Vehicles
a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
85- 4- 51
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid
of Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet inthe amount of $26,899.00 is the lowest
responsible bid for the purchase of two half-ton wagons/trucks and the Mayor
and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
said bidder for and on behalf of the City.
- Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
- 1. Battle Creek/Beaver Lake Tax Increment Financing.
2. Castle Design Development Agreement
3. Authorization to Sell Tax Increment Bonds.
4. Authorization to Sell Improvement Bonds
Councilmember Bastian moved to delete Items H - 1,2,3, and 4 from the Agenda.
- Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
7. Walter Street Feasibility Study.
- 5 - 4/08
a. Councilmember Maida moved to postpone Item H-7 until such time as
Councilmember Wasiluk can attend the meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Ripley Avenue Water Main
a. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the proposal.
b. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
85-4- 52
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized
and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Ripley
Avenue from Edgerton Street to 665 feet west by construction of water main
improvements, and
WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the
_ improvement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
as follows:
1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the
proposed improvement on Ripley Avenue from Edgerton Street to
665 feet west by construction of water improvements is feasible
and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received.
2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance
with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all
or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter
429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $51,500.00.
3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the CityHall
- at 1380 Frost Avenue on Monday, the 13th day of May, 1985, at 7:00 P.M.
to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law.
Secondedby Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
3. 7:20 P.M., 1840 - 76 English Street (4 Votes)
3
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal
- to rezone 1840 - 76 English Street from M-2 heavy manufacturing to BC, business
commercial.
b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
- •c. Commissioner Robert Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
- 6 - 4/08
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The foll~awing were heard:
Mr. Wayne.Lindahl, owner of the G3~ad's,tnne~~Mbbi4e"~HOmeP:ark
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
85 - 4 - 53
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from M-2, heavy
manufacturing to BC, business commercial for the following-described
property:
Subject to rx~ods and Northern Pacific Railway right-of-way, Lots
8-15, Block 3 and Lots 1-7, Block 4, Gladstone Addition.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
- 1. This rezoningwas initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant
to Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of .Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewedby the Maplewood Planning Commission
on March 18, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said rezoning be approved.
3. .The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 8th,
1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and
mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the
City Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
the above-described .rezoning be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent
of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh-
boyhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in-
cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
`'a of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The proposed change would be compatible with the service commercial
classification of the comprehensive land use plan and with the ma-
jority of the existing uses.
6. The M-2 zone is not compatible with the existing or proposed surrounding
- 7 - 4/08
land uses.
Seconded by Councilmember.Anderson. Ayes - all.
4. 7:30 P.M. - Rezoning 1344 Frost Avenue and 1865 - 1909 Clarence (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal
to rezone 1344 Frost Avenue and 1909 Clarence Street from BC, Business Commercial
to BC (M) business commercial modified; 1875 and 1889 Clarence (lots 7-9 and
18-21, Block 6, Gladstone) to be rezoned to R-l, single dwelling and lots 1-6
- light manufacturing (property south of 1344 Frost and 1909 Clarence).
b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Robert Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents..'None were heard.
- f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Mayor Greavu moved to deny the rezoning of 1344 Frost Avenue and 1865 - 1909
Clarence as proposed.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers
Anderson and Maida.
Nay - Councilmember Bastian
h. Councilmember Bastian moved to refer this item to the Planning Commission
for study.
Seconded by P4ayor Greavu. Ayes - all.
5. 7:40 P.M. - Rezoning and Plan Amendment City Hall/Fire Station (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal
to rezone 1380 Frost Avenue and 1900 Clarence from BC, business commercial, to BC (M)
business commercial modified and for a plan amendment from L4 municipal to LSC
limited service commercial.
b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Robert Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard.
a
e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard.
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Maida introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
85 - 4 - 54
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
- 8 - 4/08
- - COmprehenSive Plan £rom M, municipal to LSC, limited service commercial
£or 1380 FrostAvenue.
WHEREZ~S, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1, This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood.
2. TheklaplewoodPlanning Commission held a public hearing on March 18,
1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published
and maledpursuant to law.. All persons present at said hearing were
givenan opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Planning Commissionrecommendedto the City Council that said plan
amendment beapproved-..
3, The MaplewoodCity Council considered said plan amendment On April 8,
1985. The-Council consideredreports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City Staf£..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above^describedplan amendment beapprovedon the basis of the following
- Endings of-fact:
1. TheCity intends tosell the-property for commercial use,
2. The-LSC designation will communicate the need to restrict this site
to transition commercial usesthat would be compatible with adjacent
singledwellings,
Seconded by Couhcilmember Anderson. Ayes - all..
h. CouncilmemberMaiddintroducedthefollowingresolutonandmoVed its adoption:
85 ^ 4 ^ 55
WHEREAS, theCity of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business
commercial to BC (M), business commercial (modified) for thefollowing^
describedproperty:.
Lots 1 through 5 and 26 through 30, Block 12; Gladstone Addition,
Section 15, Township 29, Range 22
This property is alsoknownas 1900 Clarence Street and 1380 Frost
Avenue, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the-procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
_i 1. This rezoning was initiated by theCity of Maplewood, pursuant to
- Chapter 36, Article VII of the~Maplewood Code o£ Ordinances,
20 This rezoning was reviewed by the-Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 28, 1985. ThePlanning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be approved.
' 3, The-Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 1985,
to consderthis rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
- - 9 - 4/08
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff
and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
' - above-described rezoning be Approved on the basisof the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the
area included in .the proposed change or plan is adequately safe-
guarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect uponthe logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. State law requires the zoning to be amended when caused to be incon-
sistent with the land use plan as result of a-plan amendment.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
- K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. City Hall
a. Councilmember Anderson questioned the progress of theproposed City Hall.
b. Manager Evans states wen.are=wai~ttiig`for~'sr~i1 borings.
- E. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
6. 7:50 P.M. - Rezoning and Plan Amendment North of Frost Avenue
a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
proposal to rezone and a plan amendment for the property north of Frost
Avenue, south of the abandoned Soo line right of way, west of Gladstone
Community Center and east of the BN Tracks except the undeveloped lots
behind the Gladstone House.
',Li b. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
c. Commissioner Robert Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
d. Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the
proposal. The following persons voiced their opinions:
Mrs. Tim Klein, 1954~Ide St.
e. Councilmember Bastian wished to go on record as stating he did not have a
direct interest in theGladstone House property.
- 10 - 4/OS
f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 56
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan from LSC, limited service commercial to RM, residential
medium density and RH, residential high density for the property between
the Gladstone Community Center and the railroad tracks and north of the area
- from Miller's Meats tothe Gladstone House, except the undeveloped land north
of the Gladstone House.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood.
- 2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 18,
1985, to consider this plan amendment.. Notice thereof was published
- and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Planning Commissionrecommended to the City Council that said plan
amendment be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan. amendment on April 8,
1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following find-
ings of fact:
1. This area is better suited to multiple dwelling use than to commercial
use.
2. Location of multiple dwellings in this area would be consistent with
land use and housing plan policies.
3. Abandonment of the Soo Line tracks makes this area more desirable
for residential use.
4. The Rx, residential high density designation would help to compensate
for some of the RH land lost over the last few years as part of the
Council's downzoning program.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
h. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
- 11 - 4/08
85 - 4 - 57
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business
commercial to BC (M), business commercial (modified) for the following-
described properties all in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22c
Except that part of the following described parcel lying north of
the Westerly extension of Lot 6, Block 11, Gladstone Addition:
Block 7, Gladstone Addition.
This property is more commonly referred to as 1351 Frost Avenue
(zoned BC);
- Lunn's Rearrangement of Lots-7 through 12, Block 11, Gladstone
Addition; except the North 14.25 feet of Lot 4 and all of Lots 5
through 9 (zoned BC).
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoningwas reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission
on March 18, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 8,
1985, to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published
and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing
were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state-
ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
- 3
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The BC zone is not consistent with the LSC land use designation.
6. The BC (M) zone is the most permissive zone that is still compatible
with the LSCdesignation.
- 12 - 4/08
- - 7. The existing uses would be allowed in the BC (M) zone.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
i. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 58
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business
commercial and M-l, light manufacturing to R-3, multiple dwelling for the
following-described properties, all in Section 15, Township 29, Range 22:
That part of Block 8, Gladstone Addition, lying southwesterly of a
line running from the Northwest corner of said block to a point on
the Southeasterly line of said block 35.2.2 feet southwesterly from
the Northeasterly corner thereof (zoned M-1);
That part of Block 8, Gladstone Addition, lying northeasterly of a
linerunning from the Northwesterly corner of said block to a
point on the Southeasterly line of and 352.2 feet from the North-
easterly corner of said block (zoned M-1);
Except that part lying south of the Westerly extension of the
North line of Lot 6, Block 11, the following described parcel:
a 100-foot wide railroad right-of-way for wye track on South
half Northwest 1/'4 and Northwest 1~4 of the Southwest 1`4 (zoned
BC and M-1) ;
Except that part lying south of the Westerly extension of the North
line of Lot 6, Block 11, Gladstone Addition, the following described
_ parcel: Block 7, Gladstone.Addition (zoned BC);
That part of the following described parcel that lies between the
extended centerline of Ide Street and the centerline of Burlington
Northern Railroad right-of-way: a 100-foot wide railroad right-of-
way across the North half of said section (zoned M-1).
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, purs~l.ant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 18, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the~'City
Council that said rezoning be approved.
3
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 8, 1985,
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and
. Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
- 13 - 4/08
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the
area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safe-
guarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The property owners requested R-3 zoning.
6. The abondonment of the 50o Line track makes this land better suited
for residential use.
7. There are high density apartments built to the north of the Soo
Line trail.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
j. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution andmoved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 59
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from R-1, single
dwelling to R-2, double dwelling for the following-described property:
Lunn's Rearrangement of Lots 7 through 12, Block 11, Gladstone Addition;
North 14.25 feet of Lot 4 and all of Lots 1 through 3;
This property is also known as 1938 Clarence Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 18, 1985. The Plannning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be approved.
`i
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April S, 1985, to
- consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearingwere given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Plan-
ning Commission.,
- l4 - 4/08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The property is being used as a duplex.
6. The duplex is a nonconforming use in the existing LBC zone.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
k. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 6~i
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from R-l, single
dwelling and. LBC, limited business commercial to BC (M), business commercial
- (modified) for the following-described property:
Lots 13 through 19, Block 11, Gladstone Addition
This property is also known as 1375 Frost Avenue, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning isas follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the Cityof Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 18, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that said rezoning be approved.
"a 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 8, 1985,
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
- 15 - 4/08
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
_ the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
neighborhood, and that the use of the property. adjacent to the area
included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. This property will never be used for single dwelling use.
6. BC (M) zoning is consistent with the LSC land use designation.
7. The properties to the west are proposed for BC (M) zoning.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
1. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85- 4- 61
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from LBC, limited
business commercial to R-2, double dwelling for the following-described
properties:
Lots 1-15, Block 16, Gladstone Addition and Lots 1-6, Block 11
This property is also known as 1942-60 Ide Street, 140.1 Frost Avenue
and 1960-70 Clarence Street, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning islasfollows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 18, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said rezoning be approved.
',b 3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 8, 1985,
to consider this rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
- pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and
Planning Commission.
- 16 - 4/08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning. code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the
- neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the
- area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safe-
guarded.
_ 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The R-2 zone would allow the existing homes-to expand without council
approval.
6. The R-2 zone would allow expansion for double dwelling use.
7. Storm sewer assessments would be made at a residential rate.
8. It is unlikely that many of these homes would be converted to commercial
use, because most of the homes lack good visibility from Frost Avenue
and are costly to convert or rebuild for commercial use. A conversion
of some to double dwellings is more likely.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued)
5. Plan Amendment and Rezoning County Road C, etc.
a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
b. The following residents expressed their opinions regarding the proposal:
Mr. George Rossbach, 1406 E. County Road C.
Mr. Mark Terry, 1478 Gervais
Mr. Bob Schmidt, 1439 E. Burke representing Holy Redeemer Council Parish
Mr. Phil Oswald, 2676 English
'a Mr. John Luger, 1479 Brooks
c. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85- 4- 62
WHEREAS, the City Council initiated an amendment to the Maplewood Comprehen-
sive Plan from RM, residential medium density to RL, residential low density
for the following-described property:
- 17 - 4/08
North of Gervais Avenue and 600 feet west of Hazelwood Avenue
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on
February 4, 1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof
was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at
said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present
written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that said. plan amendment be kept RM and expanded.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on April
8, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from
the Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described plan amendment be approved forthe reasons given in the
respective rezonings.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
d. Mayor Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
85- 4- 63
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated the following rezonings (all in
Section 10, Township 29, Range 22):
1. From F, farm residence to R-l, residence district (single Dwelling):
a. Except the West 650 feet of the following described property:
subject to road and easements and except-railroad right-of-way and
except the South 103 feet of the North 393 feet of-the West 207.5 _
feet of the East 659.8 feet and except South 105 feet of the North
395 feet of the West 207.5 feet of the East 867.3 feet of the North
half of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4;
This property is the east half of 1534 County Road C;
b. The South 103 feet of the North 393 feet of the West 207.5
feet of the East 659.8 feet of the N 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4;
This property is the east half of 1448 County Road C;
c. Except the West 650 feet of the following described property;
except the BN railroad right-of-way and except the South 150 feet
fj of .the East.l83 feet;~.the South 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4
subject to road;
This property is the east half of 2555 Hazelwood Avenue;
d. Subject to avenue and easements, the North 182 feet of the South
198 feet of the SE 1/4 of the 5E 1~4 of the NW 1/4;
This property is commonly referred to as 2411 Hazelwood Avenue,
Maplewood;-
- 18 - 4/08
e. Except the West 460 feet, the North 132 feet of the South
1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 subject to avenue
and easements;
This property is commonly referred to as 2425 Hazelwood Avenue;
The reasons for the rezonings are that:
a. Both the R-1 and F zones allow churches by special permit.
b. The F zone allows agricultural uses, such as commercial green-
houses and raisinglivestock, that may not be compatible with
single dwellings.
c. Except for the church, these parcels are planned for single
dwelling use.
2. From R-2. to R-L•
The east 75 feet of the following described property: the
North 75 feet of the South 185 feet of Lot one, Block two,
Auditor's Subdivision.NO. 76 except the east 454 feet, subject
to road easement.
This property is the east 75 feet of 2510 Barclay Street;
The reasons for this rezoning are that:
a. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan designa-
tion of RL, residential low density.
b. There are no plans to convert the existing-single dwelling
to a doubledwelling.
3. From R-1 to R-2:
_ The west 75 feet of the following described property: the
South 110 feet-of Lot one, Block Two, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 76, except the East 454 feet, subject to easements.
The reasons for this rezoning are:
a. The owner of the lot at the corner of Barclay Street and
Brooks Avenue constructed his home to be converted to a double
dwelling in the future, based on the existing zoning.
- 8
b. A double dwelling would be consistent with the RL, residen-
tial low density designation of the comprehensive plan which
allows for an occasional double dwelling.
4. From R-3, residence district (multiple dwelling) to R-l:
The South 200 feet of the West 270.85 feet of the following de-
scribed parcel: except West 389 feet the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
of NW 1/4 and subject to Hazelwood Avenue and except North 132
feet of S 1/2 and except North 182 feet of South 198 feet the SE
1/4 of 5E 1/4 of NW 1/4 subject to easements;
- 19 - 4/08
The reasons for this rezoning are:
a. One. of the policies of the comprehensive plan is to
have similar uses fronting each other on the same street.
b. Multiple dwellings would not be similarin scale or
design to the existing single dwellings on the south side of
GervaisAvenue.
5. From R-3 to R-1:
a. Except the South 200 feet of the West 270.85 feet of the
following property: except West 389 feet of the SW 1/4 of SE
1/4 of NW 1/4and subject to Hazelwood Avenue and except North
132 feet of S 1/2 and except North 182 feet of South 198 feet
the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of NW 1/4, subject to easements;
b. Subject to easements to the West 460 feet of North 7.32 feet
of S 1/2 of SE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4;
6. From M-l, light manufacturing to R-1:
a. The West 650 feet of the following described property: subject
to road and easements and except railroad right-of-way and except
the South 103 feet of the North 393 feet of the West 207.5 feet of
the East 659.8 feet and except the South 105 feet of the North 395
feet of the West 207.5 feet of the East 867.3 feet of the North half
of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4;
This property is the west 650 feet of 1534 County Road C;
b. The South 105 feet of the North 395 feet of the West 207.5 feet
of the East 867..3 feet of the North 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4;
- This property is the west 1/2 of 1448 E. County Road C;
c. The West 650 feet of the following described property: except
the BN railroad right-of-way and except the South 150 feet of the
- East 183 feet; the South 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 subject to
road;
This property is the west half of 2555 Hazelwood Avenue;
d. The South 327.92 feet of Lot Five, Block Two, Auditor's Sub-
division No. 76;
`a This property is commonly referred to as 2471 Barclay Street;
e. The North 88.57 feet of Lot Five and all of Lot Six, Block Two,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 76;
This property is commonly referred to as 2477 Barclay Street;
f. Lot Seven, Block Two, Auditor's Subdivision No. 76;
This property is commonly referred to as 2511 Barclay Street;
- 20 - 4/08
g. The West 1/2 of the NW 1/4 easterly of the NP railroad
right-of-way;
h. Subject to street, the West 389 feet of the SW 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4;
The reasons for the rezonings are:
a. An R-3 zonewould create excessive traffic through single
dwelling neighborhoods. The City has had a policy of not
routing commercial or multiple dwelling traffic through single
dwelling neighborhoods.
b. Gervais Avenue is not planned to be extended unless MnDOT builds
an interchange on Highway 36. An interchange would not be built
until traffic increases enough to justify the expense. If Gervais
Avenue is not extended, it would be considered a local residential
street.
c. The R-1 zoning allows for single dwellings., which would be com-
patible with adjacent single dwellings.
d. The M-1 zone is obsolete, unrealistic and would bring truck
traffic through single dwelling neighborhoods.
WHEREAS, in addition to the specific findings listed above for each re-
zoning, the City makes the following general findings for all of the above
rezonings:
1. The proposed changes are consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code. _
2. The proposed changes will not substantially injure-or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh-
borhood, and that the useof the property adjacent to the areas in-
cluded in the proposed changes are adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed changes will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed changes would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as publicwater, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The proposed amendments promote the health, safety and morals and
general welfare of the inhabitants of the City by lessening congestion
La of the streets, securing safety from fire, panic and other dangers,
providing adequatelight and air, preventing the overcrowding of land,
avoiding undue concentration of population, facilitating the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other
public requirements, conserving the values of properties and encouraging
a most appropriate use of land.
6. The proposed amendments are compatible with existing contiguous land
uses in the neighboring community and adequately safeguard the essen-
tially single-family residential character heretofore established in
the adjacent area.
- 21 - 4/08
7. That the lands presently zoned F, R-3 and M-1 have been vacant,
open and undeveloped for at least twenty (20) years. That such
vacant, open and undeveloped land is found to be a deleterious
land use.
8. That the existing zones of F, R-3 and M-1 constitute an obsolete
layout of the land and are not conducive to economic development.
9. That the proposed amendments will provide a uniform land use and
encourage assemblage of economically feasible tracts of land for the
provision of single-family residential dwellings.
10. That a uniform land use. consistent with the surrounding land uses
would provide the highest tax base to the City while remaining com-
patible with the neighborhood.
11. That lands that have remained vacant, open and undeveloped in excess
of twenty (20) years weaken the tax base of the community necessita-
ting amendments to the zoning code to render these lands more readily
marketable and to protect the financial stability of the community.
12. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to discourage the sub-
mission of "planned unit development" proposals pursuant to the
provisions of Section 36-438 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinance.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of these rezonings are as follows:
1. These rezonings were initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed and approved a preliminary
rezoning plan on February 4, 1985, that varies from the proposal in
this resolution..
3. The Maplewood City Councilheld a public hearing on February 25 and
April 8, 1985, to consider these rezonings. Notice thereof was pub-
lished and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hear-
, ing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written state-
ments. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of
the City Staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE.IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
: described rezonings be approved on the basis of the reasons given above.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
`a 6. Plan Amendment & Rezoning 2633 - 37 Stillwater Road.
a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
b. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85-4- 64
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
- 22 - 4/08
Comprehensive Plan from RL, low density residential to RB, residential
business for 2633 and 2637 Stillwater Road;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood.
2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 4,
1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof was published
- and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Planning Commission recommended to the. City Council that said plan be
approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on April 8,
1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described plan amendment be approved on the basisthatthe RB classification
_ would better represent the existing development of these properties.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85- 4- 65
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business
commercial to BC(M), business commercial. (modified) for the following-
described property:
Part southeasterly and southwesterly of following line, beginning
on East line of Ferndale Street 114 feet south from Northwesterly
line of Lot 26 thence northeasterly parallel to said lot line 59 06/100
feet thence southeasterly to point on Southeasterly line of said lot and
53 67/100 feet southwesterly from East corner of Lot 26 and allof Lot
27, Block 5, Midvale Acres No. 2;
This property is also known as 2633 Stillwater Road, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
1. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
?a
- 2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City
Council that said .rezoning be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on April 8, 1985,
to consider this, rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and recommendations of the City Staff and
Planning Commission..
- 23 - 4/08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above-described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings
of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh-
- borhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area in-
cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences
of the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
_ such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
d. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolutionand moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 6&
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a rezoning from BC, business
commercial to R-3, residence district (multiple dwelling) for the following-
described property:
Beginning at East corner of Lot 26 thence northwesterly to North corner
of said lot thence southwesterly on Northwesterly line of said lot to
West line of said lot thence south thereon 114 feet thence northeasterly
.parallel to said. Northwesterly line 59 06/100 feet thence southeasterly
to point on Southeasterly line of said lot and 53 67/100 feet from beginning
thence to beginning in Lot 26, Block 5, Midvale Acres No. 2;
This propertyis also known as 2637 Stillwater Road, Maplewood;
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this rezoning is as follows:
L'. This rezoning was initiated by the City of Maplewood, pursuant to
Chapter 36, Article VII of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This rezoning was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on
March 4, 1985. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
-'-8 that said rezoning be''approved.
3. The Maplewood CityCouncil held a public hearing on April 8, 1985.,
to considerthis rezoning. Notice thereof was published and mailed
pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City Staff and
Planning Commission.
- 24 - 4/08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described rezoning be approved on the basis of the following findings of fact:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
- intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from
the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neigh-
. borhood, and that the use of the .property adjacent to the area in-
cluded in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change. would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
I. NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
2. Amendment to Alarm Ordinance - First Reading
a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
- b. Mayor Greavu moved first reading of an ordinance amending Section 4-48
by "Owners of alarms for the protection of their single family dwelling
are exempted from this annual Fee."
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
3. Plan Amendment 1426 Frost Avenue
a. Manager Evans presented the Staff report.
b. Commissioner Robert Cardinal presented the Planning Commission recommendation.
c. Councilmember Anderson introduced the following resolution and moved its
- adoption:
85 - 4 - 67
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated an amendment to the Maplewood
Comprehensive Plan from RL, residential low density to RM, residential medium
density for 1426 Frost Avenue.
- i
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. This plan amendment was initiated by the City of Maplewood.
2. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 18,
1985, to consider this plan amendment. Notice thereof, was published
• and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were
given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The
Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said plan
amendment be approved.
- 25 - 4/08
3. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on April
8, 1985. The Council considered reports and recommendations from the
Planning Commission and City Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above-
described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following findings of
fact:
1. The site is occupied with a seven-unit apartment building. Single
dwelling use, consistent with the land use plan, is not realistic.
2. The site is zoned for multiple-dwelling use.
3. The RM designation would limit further expansion of the building,
assuring compatibility with the adjacent single-dwelling neighborhood.
4. This amendment is not intended to prejudice future consideration of
a conditional use permit for an additional unit within the existing
building or future addition of garages.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
4. H.R.A. Annual Report
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to accept and file The Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Annual Report for March, 1984, through February, 1985.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
5. Reconsideration.: Cave's Lakewood Addition
a. Councilmember Anderson moved to reconsider the Council's action of March 25,
1985, regarding Cave's Lakewood Addition's preliminary plat.
Seconded by Mayor Greavu. Ayes -all.
6. Amendment to Firefighters' By-Laws
a. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the following amendments to the
Firefighters' By-Laws:
Article IV
Section 1 - Membership
Add to: A Firefighter cannot be a member of the relief association until
- he is a fully accepted member of Fire Department. Then the Board must
give him an.. application to be filled out and then must act on him separately.
d
Article V
Section 5 - Quorums
Now reads: Four
Change to: Six
Article VI
Section 5 - Death Benefits
Now reads: $1,000.00
Change to: $3,000.00
Section 6 - Disability Benefits
Now reads: $1,000.00
Change to: $3,000.00 - 26 - 4/08
Article VI
Section 2 - Service Credit
Now reads: $700.00 peryear
Change to $800.00 per year
Now reads: Maximum service credit after 30 years $21,000.00.
Change to: No limit on years of service except as stated in Article IV.
Section 2 - Age Requirements.
No firefighter who is more than 35 years of age when his
application is filed can become a member of the relief
associationexcept that such age limitation of 35 years
shall not apply. on application for reinstatement in the
association.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
2. Golf Ordinance
a. Councilmember Bastian questioned the City's liability for residents
golfing in the Parks.
b. Council referred this matter to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
3. Revenue Sharing.
a. Councilmember Bastian stated that at the.A.M.M. meeting it was requested
that letters~be forwarded to City's legislative representatives regarding the
Federal goverment withdrawing revenue sharing. He also requested that Maple-
wood's firefighters be notified since their budget was from revenue sharing.
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Assessment Appeal
a. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
85 - 4 - 68
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1985, the Maplewood City Council
passed its Resolution reducing certain special assessments levied July 30, 1981,
for Local Public .Improvement Project 79-1 as the same pertains to Parcels 1 and
'a 2 therein; .and
WHEREAS, in order to effectuate said reduction consistent with the Stipulation
of Settlement and Dismissal as to Parcels 1 and 2 dated February 19, 1985, Ramsey
County District Court File No. 452734 it is necessary to amend said Resolution
dated February 25, 1985.
- 27 - 4/08
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNTY OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD that
Resolution No. 85-2-27 be and hereby is amended as follows:
1) That Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 remain the same
2) That Paragraph 4 read as follows:
That the Ramsey County Auditor be, and hereby is, authorized and
directed to levy the reduced assessments indicated at Paragraph 3
above as follows:
Parcel No. Auditor's No. Amount To Be Levied
57 19000 291 13 5556 $ Principal $13,611.31
Accrued Ubterest + 5,123.43
Total Levy $18,734.74
57 19000 020 18 5556 $ Principal $10,744.79
_ Accrued Interest 4,044.44
Total Levy $14,789.23
Parcel No. Amount of Levy Interest Rate No. of Years
- 57 19000 291 13 $ 18,734.74 9e 20 years
57 19000 020 18 $ 14,789.23 90 20 years
5) That the balance of said Resolution No. 85-2-27 remain the same save and
except that commencing with Paragraph 4 that Paragraph 4 be renumbered
5 and each successive Paragraph thereafter of the original Resolution
increased accordingly.
Seconded by Councilmember Maida. Ayes - all.
M. ADJOURNMENT
9:14 P.M.
City Clerk
8
- 28 - 4/08