Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-1972AGENDA Maplewood Village Council 7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 3, 1972 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 72 - 26 (A) CALL TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 72 -23 (July 13) 2. Minutes No. 72 -24 (July 20) 3. Minutes No. 72 -25 (July 27) (D) PUBLIC HEARINGS - None (E) AWARDING OF BIDS 1. Tractor Park) 2. Corrugated Metal Pipe (County Ditch 17) 3. Street Improvement - Conway and McKnight (F) APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS G) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Dump Permit (Reconsideration) - County Road C 2. Park Plan - Gethsemane Park /School 3. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - East of Arcade Street in the vicinity of County Road B 4. Special Use Exception - 1175 East Highway 36 ........................... 5. Property Division and Assessment Split 6. Planned Unit Development (Maplewoods) - Final plat 7. Kohlman's Addition - Final plat 8. Community Design Review Board - Ordinance (adoption) 9. Water Improvement - 11th Avenue (Supplemental agreemc 10. Water Improvement - County Road B (Final plans)', (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Community Design Review Board (Building Plan Re a. Jasinski Liquor Store (2730 Stillwater Roac b. Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company (1065 F 36) C. Schroeder Milk Company (2080 Rice Street) d. Kroger (1815 North St. Paul Road) 2. Tree Disposal Service - Proposal (Ecological Conserva Services) 3. Street Vacation - Dorle Road (Petition) 4. Property Divisions 5. Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvement - County Road B' (Petition) 6. Street Closing - Bicycle ride 7. Conciliation Court 8. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Request for gravity sewE (Metropolitan Sewer Board) 9. Tavern License - Gladstone House (J) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS (L) ADJOUP-NMENT ADDENDUM TO THE AGENDA Meeting 72 - 26 I T E M E -1 Three thousand dollars is included in the 1972 Budget for this item. E -2* This pipe is for the installation and replacement of culverts for County Ditch 17. Quotations were received from three pipe companies. Acceptance of the low quotation from Armco is recommended. E -3 Bids for this project were taken on July 31 by the County. I£ the bids are in order and accepted by the County, we would reccmmend Village Council concurrence in the award for this project. It is my understanding that the bids are far below the estimated cost of the project. H -1 Persons in the area of this dump permit requested reconsider- ation of the issuance of the permit. H -2 The Council had referred this matter back to the staff to re- view alternate methods of constructing facilities in this area. A presentation will be made at the meeting. The findings of the staff review are that if the park is to be fully utilized, there is no choice but to utilize the original plan. H -3 It is recommended that Milner W. Carley and Associates be retained as the project engineers for this installation. That company was utilized for the surveying portion and it is felt that it can more efficiently design the project. Final plans will be ready for the project and a bid opening date of August 23 is recommended. Property owners in the area have been notified that this item will be on the agenda. H -4* The applicants are requesting a special exemption from the M -1 (light manufacturing) zone for the buildings addressed as 1175 and 1195 East Highway 36 to allow for "general office and business use". There are two existing offices being operated out of the building at 1175 East Highway 36 at the present time. The applicant is operating one office space for the purposes of showing and protecting the property. We agree that this use is acceptable under zoning regulations for the purposes of selling the property. The other office is not being operated for this purpose and does require a special exception as does the use of the entire buildings for the stated purposes. The building located at 1175 was con- structed under a permit showing its use as "commercial ". This use was never sanctioned by a special exception by the Village Council. The proposed land use plan does envision such use of this property; however, the land use at this time is still in the "proposed" stage and has not been finally adopted by either the Planning Commission or the Council. The Council has determined that special exceptions from M -1 zoning do come within the realm of the moratorium established by the Council. In addition, the applicants are not making a specific proposal, but rather wish a general approval of a general usage. Such a general allowance is only given by a zone change and not a special exception permit. The applicants wish to sell the property and are not proposing a specific use for themselves. It is recommended that a decision on the special exception request be held in abeyance until the expiration of the moratorium, and that the applicants be informed that at that time they should either present a specific request or consider requesting a zone change. H -5* The major property owners in the area of the Homart development have agreed among themselves, as a result of a need to adjust property Lines in multiple areas around the perimeter of the Homart tract, to combine all properties involved for ease of adjustment and then to reissue and record a revised description. In this way they would eliminate the multiple fragment of property descriptions that would have resulted in their first proposal. The Village Attorney's Office has reviewed the situation and has advised us that the State law which excludes _platting of tracts of more than five acres would effect this situation in the following manner: (1) the resulting parcel. owned by Homart would not be subject to our platting code _re- quirements due to the fact that its total lot size will exceed five acres and (2) the Korstad parcel which would be accepted out of this transfer will be less than five acres and will, therefore, be subject to our platting code requirements. In November of 1971, Korstad and Homart jointly divided ownership and the frontage pattern which resulted in the need for the splitting of assessments for the improvement of White Bear Avenue along the frontage of the property. The redistribution of these assessments was not possible until the Village had approved the platting of the Korstad property. No such application was made and the assessments were not redistributed. Now to combine all properties Ramsey County desires the assess- ments split figures so that the total 1971 taxes can be paid. It is recommended that the assessments be computed and ordered distributed by the Council in accordance with their distribution policies. In the case of the proposed property division, it is recommended that a variance from Section 1008 of the Platting Code be granted which waives the requirements of formal platting for the Korstad property. Such a waiver should be subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be a written legal description of the parcel furnished to the Village; 2. The parcel shall waive its claims to any curb cut vehicle access points directly onto or off -of or. within 200 -feet of White Bear Avenue; 3. The Homart parcel shall provide a reciprocal easement agreement to the Korstad parcel which provides access routes to the Korstad parcel to and from White Bear Avenue, and further such agreement shall be reviewed and approved as to form by the Village Attorney; -2- 4. The Korstad parcel shall provide a lot division fee of $20.00 in accordance with Village requirements to defray expenses in adjusting all its records and accounts relating to the properties; 5. Any further ownership division within property lines of the Korstad parcel shall not be allowed or recognized by the Village accept by way of formal plat under the Village Code; and 6. Korstad and Homart shall agree in writing to the appropriate conditions relating to the Korstad parcel and such written agreement shall be filed with the Village. As a result of the refiling of the new description with Ramsey County will be necessary to again officially split the White Bear Avenue levied assessments based upon the new property descriptions. It. is recommended that the Village authorize the splitting of the outstanding assessments in methods utilized by the Council for assessment splitting by the proper Village officials and that the Council approve such in order that it may be so recorded for 1972 collection. It should be noted that Homart will ultimately be required to plat its area. We have informed Homart that such a platting will be required prior to occupancy of any building or portion thereof in the center. This will allow Homart to finalize its sales arrangements prior to platting. The staff has discussed these provisions with Mr. May and they appear to be acceptable to Homart. H -6* The proposed final subdivision plat for the Maplewoods area is in accordance with the preliminary plat. Final plat approval is recommended subject to compliance with the pre- liminary plat approval conditions prior to the signing of the final plat. H -7* This final plat is in accordance with the approved preliminary plat. A copy of the proposed escrow agreement is included. This project is not serviced by a public water system. Included in the escrow agreement is the installation of a "dry" watermain. H -8 At your meeting of July 20, you placed on first reading an ordinance which corrects the community design review board ordinance relative to final approval of building plans by the Council. The original ordinance included contradictory sections relative to this question. H -9* During the construction of the Eleventh Avenue watermain pro- ject it was necessary to remove some curb and gutter at a total cost of $372.50. Approval of a supplementary agreement allowing for this work is recommended. H -10* Final plans have been prepared for the County B water line between Day Road and Highway 61. Approval of the plans is recommended and a bid date of August 15 is suggested. -3- I -la* The building plan proposed is for an addition to the Jasinski Liquor store at 2730 Stillwater Road. The addition proposed is to the south of the existing building and is for the pur- pose of storage of retail liquors. Approval of the plans is recommended subject to conditions regarding (1) the removal of a truck, a sign and pole structure and a temporary storage shed, (2) the paving of the parking area, (3) the provision of enclosed waste removal facilities, (4) driveway locations, (5) removal of an underground petroleum tank and (6) the striping of the off - street parking lot. Mr. Jasinski did pick up the staff report on the afternoon of July 20. We regularly make it a practice to notify people of the availability of staff reports involving them on the day of the release of the agenda. It should be the responsibility of the applicant to pick up the report and review it prior to the meeting. If the staff report is made available prior to the meeting, it is my feeling that any request for reconsideration based upon the failure of an applicant to secure a copy of the staff re- port or to comment on it is invalid and should not be con - sidered. I -lb* The Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company has requested per- mission to construct a 3200 square foot garage to the north of their existing building. Approval of the building plans is recommended. I -lc* The Schroeder Milk Company wishes to build an office addition above the existing building. Approval is recommended. I -ld* Gold Bond of Minnesota has requested authority to remodel signs located on the Kroger property. Approval of the request is recommended. I -2* Ecological Conservation Services Inc. wishes to make a pro- posal for the disposal and removal of diseased trees in Maplewood. A copy of that proposal is enclosed. We have been informed by John Sauers, President of the organization, that Ecological Conservation Services is a nonprofit organization involving minority groups and the handicapped. Mr. Sauers wishes to make a presentation to the Council relative to their services. We would recommend that any action on the part of the Council be delayed for further staff review. I -3 We have received a petition from fifty percent of the property ownerships along Dorle Road (approximately 450 -feet south of County Road D,extending approximately 225 -feet east of Hazel- wood). A hearing date of September 7 is recommended. I -4* Myra Kruger, 2671 Conway, has requested a lot division of Lot 6, Block 7, Farrell addition. Approval of the lot division is recommended subject to the following conditions: (1) A survey of all resulting parcels shall be provided, (2) All outstanding assessments shall be paid, (3) The garage remaining on the parcel may not be used as a dwelling, (4) The parcel with the house remaining shall have two offstreet parking spaces and the driveway provided in accordance with the Village Code, and Q� (5) Myra Kruger, as owner shall sign an agreement acknowledging compliance with all conditions. Keith, Jay and Dean Libby have requested that an existing 8.23 acre parcel be divided into at least three parcels to erect three single family dwellings. The Village Code requires formal platting for such a subdivision and further provides that no building permit shall be issued for single dwelling units on any property not having frontage on a public street. The land in question is remote from any public services and would not appear to be ready for development. I -5* We have received a petition for the connection of water and sanitary sewer lines in County Road B from the Soo Line Rail- road eastward for a distance of 540 -feet. A feasibility report should be requested. I -6 Arrangements have been made with the City of St. Paul to schedule a bicycle ride for Sunday, August 6 between the hours of 1:00 and 5:00 P.M. St. Paul will close Johnson Parkway from Phalen south to Mounds Park and it is requested that the Village close Ripley Avenue between the entrance to Wakefield Park and East Shore Drive near Phalen Lake. The route will again be signed and residents will still have normal access to their properties. The closing of Ripley Avenue is rec- commended. I -7* Enclosed is a resolution which would establish a conciliation court utilizing our existing Municipal Court. The conciliation court would not involve increased costs to the participating Villages. Citizens of Maplewood are now required to go to St. Paul if they desire conciliation court processes. It is felt that this service will be a valuable one to the citizens of our community. I -8* our preliminary sanitary sewer study suggested that Maplewood encourage the MSB to proceed with the construction of a replacement interceptor for the "White Bear Interceptor" under gravity conditions and to locate it along the right -of- way of TH 61 in the Village. This will result in the elimination of many of the Village's lift stations and in savings in future maintenance costs. It is recommended that the resolution which is enclosed be adopted. I -9 The Gladstone House has requested a tavern license. Approval is recommended. -5- MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD VILLAGE COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 3, 1972 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 72 -26 A CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7:34 P.M. by Mayor Axdahl. B. ROLL CALL Lester G. Axdahl, Mayor John C. Greavu, Councilman Harald L. Haugan, Councilman Patricia L. Olson, Councilwoman Donald J. Wiegert, Councilman C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 72 -23 (July 13, 1972) Present Present Present Present, excused at 9:25 P.M. Present Councilman Haugan moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -23 (July 13, 1972) be approved as corrected: Page 2: Item C 1 -f, Revise the motion to read "Council wants more information about H.R.A., the feasibility study for utilities for the area is not ready and with the understanding that "when taken from the table" similar notification will again be given to the area residents of the surround- ing area." Item C 1 -g, insert "institution of" Item.,C 1 -h, delete paragraph Page 3: Item D -4, "alignments" instead of "locations" Seconded by Councilman Wiegert, Ayes - all. 2. Minutes No. 72 -24 (July 20, 1972) Councilman Greavu moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -24 (July 20, 1972) be approved as corrected: Page 3: Item E 3 -b: Revise resolution 72 -7 -158. Page 14: Item 8, add "Both Councilmen Greavu and Wiegert agreed that it had been their understanding and intent- ion that a permanent access road to the south was one of the conditions of Phase I of Forest Green Development." Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. - 1 - 8/3 3. Minutes No. 72 -25 (July 27, 1972) Councilman Wiegert moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -25 (July 27, 1972) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. E. AWARD OF. BIDS 1. Tractor (Park) a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated that Staff recommends the bid be awarded to Reed Sales for the purchase of a Simplicity Tractor Machine. The amount of $3,000.00 is included in the 1972 Budget for this item. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 8 - 165 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Reed's Sales and Service in the amount of $3,000.00 is the low- est responsible bid for One (1) Model 4040 Tractor and Accessories, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the Village. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 2. Corrugated Metal Pipe (County Ditch 17) a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated this pipe is for installation and replacement of culverts for County Ditch 17, quotations were received from three pipe companies. Acceptance of the low bid from Armco is recommended. b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 8 - 166 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the quotation of Armco Steel Corporation for furnishing culvert pipe for the construction of culverts for County Ditch #17, is the lowest respon- sible bid, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the Village. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 3. Street Improvement - Conway and McKnight a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated bids for this project were taken on July 31 by the County. If the bids are in order and accepted by the County, Staff recommends Village Council concurrence in the award for this project. - 2 - 8/3 b. Floyd Snyker, Assistant Ramsey County Engineer, stated Alexander Construction Company was low bidder at $317,000.00. This is a project entered into jointly by the County and the Village. The Commissioner of Highways is acting as County Agent in awarding the contracts. c. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 -8 -167 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD 1. That the Village of Maplewood concurs with the Ramsey County Board in its action dated July 31, 1972 recommending an award of contract in the amount of $317,099.15 to the Alexander Construction Co., Inc, for the reconstruction and signalization of the intersection of Conway Avenue and McKnight Road, Projects 62- 668 -10 and 62- 668 -11; 2. That the Village of Maplewood assents to the Commissioner of High- ways of the State of Minnesota acting as Contracting Agent; 3. That the Village of Maplewood reconfirms its previous undertaking to contribute up to $160,000.00 to this project of which $50,000.00 is to be assessed directly to the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, it being understood that design and engineering heretofore expended is in- cluded in said $160,000.00 upset figure. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. d. Councilman Greavu questioned Mr. Snyker regarding Highway 212 alignment. Mr. Snyker stated that the East Area Corridor Study, for all facts and purposes, is dead. The County will be coming to the Village with their own recommendations as to what should be done. The County is involved in another "Task Force Study" for the area of Century Avenue, Larpenteur, County Road F, etc. The County has requested resolutions from all the municipalities involved to request the Metro Council for their support. Meetings are set up every Wednesday from 4:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. at the Highway Garage at Rice and I -694. F. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS Councilman Greavu f�[. 7��: I�jiiiS� .SRITif.'L�i�t.7t4sL•7e� Seconded by Councilman Haugan. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None. rough Check No. 1428 - $1 - $480,838,41: Part II - $24,367.56) in the amount Ayes - all. - 3 - 8/3 - Fees. Ser- H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Dump Permit - (Reconsideration) - County Road C a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated that persons in the area of this dump permit requested that Council reconsider the issuance of the permit. Council moved to reconsider at a previous meeting. b. Mayor Axdahl asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the recon- sideration. Mr. Roger Stanke stated the neighborhood had met as a group a week ago. They have reorganized the conditions for the fill permit. They discussed the matter and did come to an agreement. c. Mr. Gary Bowman, representing the residents of the area,reviewed the suggested revisions to the conditions. The neighbors wish to add an additional condition stating that no diseased trees will be placed at the dump site. d. Mr. Don McClellan, 961 E. County Road B, spoke in favor of the pro- posed changes for the conditions. e. Following further discussion, Councilwoman Olson moved approval of the dump fill permit with the following revised conditions: 1. The Landfill Dump Permit shall be valid only until January 1, 1973; 2. The earth cover requirements of Section 1601.030 of the Municipal Code shall be complied with at all times during the life of the permit; 3. The finished site elevation shall not exceed 880 feet above sea level or as directed by the Village Engineer; 4. No heavy earth moving equipment shall be allowed to utilize the right - or -way of County Road "C" for the purposes of maneuvering or accomp- lishing the fill operation; 5. The finished site shall be covered with a total depth of '18" of earth soil material; 6. The only materials allowable for dumping shall be stumps, trees, limbs, and wood chips. This shall not include construction demolition or concrete materials; 7. No building permits for structures shall be requested or issued until the applicant can demonstrate that this fill material has been com- pacted to satisfactory standards acceptable to the Village Engineer. 8. The fill area authorized in this permit shall be for that area as shown on the attached map; 9. The permittee shall be responsible at the end of each day for sweep- ing or otherwise keeping clean that protion of County Road "C" which is cluttered with dirt trackings resulting from droppings from trucks exiting or entering the fill area; 10. No dumping or earth moving shall be allowed during Saturday and Sun- day of each week. Dumping and operations or earth moving or heavy equipment on the site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.; 11. The landfill dump permit shall be valid only until January 1, 1973; - 4 - 8/3 However, it is understood that the applicant and the property owner must continually meet all the above conditions. If the noise, dust, or other nuisances associated with this dumping operation are found to be un- objectionable by the residents whose property is adjacent or close to the Stanke property, the permit may be extended one year; 12. The route of entrance for dumping must be via Highway 61; 13. A $1,000 performance bond shall be filed with the Village to ensure com- pliance with the above conditions; 14. The applicant and the property owner must sign indicating they agree to the above conditions. 15. All fill shall be covered daily. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Motion carried. Ayes - Councilwoman Olson, Council- men Greavu, Haugan and Wiegert. Nays - Mayor Axdahl f. Mayor Axdahl suggested that if further study indicates an ordinance of some specific nature should be drawn in regard to disposal of diseased trees, that ordinance should also affect this particular project. If it is indicated to the Council that this particular site for the disposal of trees is a har- boring vehicle for the disease and should not be encouraged for the Village; he would like to see that as a vehicle for terminating a dump of that type. 2. Park Plan - Gethsemane Park /School a. Manager Miller stated the Council had referred this matter back to the Staff to review alternate methods of constructing facilities in this area. The findings of the Staff review are that if the park is to be fully utilized, there is no choice but to utilize the original plan. b. Recreation Director Joyce presented the Staff report and the three alter - nates;n detail. c. Mr. Mark Harris, 833 Bartelmy Lane, representing the residents in the im- mediate area, is concerned about the parking on the streets, and also the water build up. He doesn't feel that the residents have been considered. The res- idents would like further consideration if the original plan is accepted. d. Mr. Bruce Warzalh, a resident and also area director for the Village, spoke in favor of the original plan. e. Mr. Jerry Proesch, baseball coach, spoke on behalf of the need for this recreation facility. f. Following further discussion, Councilman Greavu moved to transfer the $4,000.00 saved by the new Insurance policies to the Recreation Department for development of the Gethsemane Park Site by filline in the southwest cor- ate to 5. - 8/3 Seconded by Councilwoman Olson Motion carried. Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilwoman Olson, Councilmen Greavu and Wiegert. Nays - Councilman Haugan. Councilwoman Olson excused herself from the meeting at 9:25 P.M. 3. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - East of Arcade Street in the vicinity of County Road B (72 -13) a. Manager Miller stated it is recommended that Milner W. Carley and Assoc- iates be retained as the project engineers for this installation. That com- pany was utilized for the surveying portion and it is felt that it can more efficiently design the project. Final plans will be ready for the project and a bid opening date of August 23 is recommended. Property owners in the area have been notified that this item will be on the agenda. b. Village Engineer Collier explained in detail the proposed project. c. Mayor Axdahl asked if any persons wished to speak regarding the proposed improvement. Dick Todd, recently purchased a home in the area, asked questions re- garding costs and assessment procedures. d. Councilman Greavu moved to authorize that Milner W. Carley and Associates be retained as consultant Engineers for this project. (72 -13) Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. e. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 8 - 168 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the Village Council on June 22, 1972, plans and specifications for Arcade Street Sewer No. 72 -13, have been prepared under the direction of the Village Engineer, and he has pre- sented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the Village Clerk. 2. The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published once, at - 6 - 8/3 least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 A.M. on the 23rd day of August, 1972 at the Village Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota for 5% of the amount of such bid. 3. The Village Clerk and Village Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at a special meet- ing of the Village Council on August 24, 1972. 4. The advertisement for bids shall be in substantially the follow- ing form: ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will receive sealed bids for the construction of approximately 1085 feet of sanitary sewer line, 500 feet of force main, 1200 feet of services, and lift station within the Vil- lage limits on the basis of cash payment for the work. Bids will be received until 10:00 A.M., C.D.S.T., on the 23rd day of August, 1972, at the Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened, read aloud and considered. Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement there- on indicating proposal for bid contained within and addressed to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota. Proposals shall be submitted to the Village Clerk on or before the above stated time. Proposal is for the furnishing of all labor, equipment and materials and performing all work in connection with the above stated construction. Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file in the office of Milner W. Carley and Associates, 500 West Highway 96, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55112. Copies of the documents may be obtained by depositing Ten Dollars ($10) with the Engineer. The amount of deposit for one set of documents *i ll,,be refunded to each actual bidder who returns the plans and documents in good condition within ten (10) days after the opening of bids. All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota, in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total bid, conditioned that if the bidder is the successful bid- der he will enter into a contract in accordance with said bid and will fur- nish such performance bonds as are specified. No bidder may withdraw his bid for at least thrity (30) days after the scheduled closing time for the receipt of bids, without the consent of the owner. The owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informalities in bidding. - 7 - 8/3 Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 4. Special Use Exception - 1175 E. Highway 36 a. Manager Miller stated the applicants are requesting a special exemption from the M -1 (light manufacturing) zone for the buildings addressed as 1175 and 1195 East Highway 36 to allow for "general office and business use ". There are two existing offices being operated out of the building at 1175 East Highway 36 at the present time. The applicant is operating one office space for the purposes of showing and protecting the property. We agree that this use is acceptable under zoning regulations for the purposes of selling the property. The other office is not being operated for this pur- pose and does require a special exception as does the use of the entire buildings for the stated purposes. The building located at 1175 was con- structed under a permit showing its use as "commercial ". This use was never sanctioned by a special exception by the Village Council. The proposed land use plan does envision such use of this property; however, the land use at this time is still in the "proposed" stage and has not been finally adopted by either the Planning Commission or the Council. The Council has determined that special exceptions from M -1 zoning do come within the realm of the mor- atorium established by the Council. In addition, the applicants are not making a specific proposal, but rather wish a general approval of a general usage. Such a general allowance is only given by a zone change and not a special exception permit. The applicants wish to sell the property and are not proposing a specific use for themselves. It is recommended that a de- cision on the special exception request be held in abeyance until the ex- piration of the moratorium, and that the applicants be informed that at that time they should either present a specific request or consider requesting a zone change. b. Mr. Ray Faricy, attorney representing the applicant, spoke on behalf of their request. c. Mr. Proctor, Proctor Realty, also spoke on behalf of their request. d. Councilman Wiegert moved that the occupancy permit be granted for office use at 1175 E. Hiehwav 36 as it is a continuance of Drevious us Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 5. Property Division and Assessment Split a. Manager Miller stated the major property owners in the area of the Homart Development have agreed among themselves, as a result of a need to adjust property lines in multiple areas around the perimeter of the Homart tract, to combine all properties involved for ease of adjustment and then to reissue and record a revised description. In this way they would eliminate the mul- tiple fragment of property descriptions that would have resulted in their first proposal. The Village Attorney's office has reviewed the situation and has advised us that the State law which excludes platting of tracts of more - 8 - 8/3 than five acres would effect this situation in the following manner: (1) the resulting parcel owned by Homart would not be subject to our platting code requirements due to the fact that its total lot size will exceed five acres and (2) the Korstad parcel which would be accepted out of this trans- fer will be less than five acres and will, therefore, be subject to our platting code requirements. In November, of 1971, Korstad and Homart joint- ly divided ownership and the frontage pattern which resulted in the need for the splitting of assessments for the improvement of White Bear Avenue along the frontage of the property. The redistribution of these assessments was not possible until the Village had approved the platting of the Korstad property. No such application was made and the assessments were not re- distributed. Now to combine all properties Ramsey County desires the assess- ments split figures so that the total 1971 taxes can be paid. It is recom- mended that the assessments be computed and ordered distributed by the Council in accordance with their distribution policies. b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (Division No. 044193) 72 -8- 169 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 68 -9 -177, 69 -9 -155, 70 -9 -130 and 63 -8 -149 of Maplewood, adopted 9/1/68, 9/9/69, 9/1/70 and 8/22/68 the special assess- ments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White Bear Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 6 -1 were levied against the attached list of described properties; said list made a part herein; WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conveyed and are de- scribed according to the attached list, said list made a part herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINN- ESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White Bear Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 6 -1 against the heretofore mentioned properties be cor- rectly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County in the amounts stated on the attached list; said list made a part herein. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. c. Manager Miller stated in the case of the proposed property div- ision, it is recommended that a variance from Section 1008 of the Platting Code be granted which waives the requirements of formal platting for the Korstad property. Such a waiver should be subject to the following condit- ions: 1. There shall be a written legal description of the parcel furnished to the Village; 2. The parcel shall waive its claims to any curb cut vehicle access points directly onto or off -of or within 200 -feet of White Bear Avenue; 3. The Homart parcel shall provide a reciprocal easement agreement to the Korstad parcel to and from White Bear Avenue, and further such agreement shall be reviewed and approved as to form by the Village Attorney; - 9 - 8/3 4. The Korstad parcel shall provide a lot division fee of $20.00 in accordance with Village requirements to defray expenses in adjust- ing all its records and accounts relating to the properties; 5. Any further ownership division within property lines of the Korstad parcel shall not be allowed or recognized by the Village ,except by way of formal plat under the Village Code; and 6. Korstad and Homart shall agree in writing to the appropriate condit- ions relating to the Korstad parcel and such written agreement shall be filed with the Village. 7. Temporary easement be granted for Sanitary sewer construction. d. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the request for variance of the Plat ting Code subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be a written legal description of the parcel furnished to the Village; 2. The parcel shall waive its claims to any curb cut vehicle access points directly onto or off -of or within 200 -feet of White Bear Avenue; 3. The Homart parcel shall provide a reciprocal easement agreement to the Korstad parcel to and from White Bear Avenue, and further such agreement shall be reviewed and approved as to form by the Village Attorney; 4. The Korstad parcel shall provide a lot division fee of $20.00 in accordance with Village requirements to defray expenses in adjust- ing all its records and accounts relating to the properties; 5. Any further ownership division within property lines of the Korstad parcel shall not be allowed or recognized by the Village except by way of formal plat under the Village Code; and 6. Korstad and Homart shall agree in writing to the appropriate condit- ions relating to the Korstad parcel and such written agreement shall be filed with the Village. 7. Temporary easement be granted for Sanitary sewer construction. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. e. Manager Miller stated as a result of the refiling of the new description with Ramsey County it will be necessary to again officially split the White Bear Avenue levied assessments based upon the new property descriptions. It is recommended that the Village authorize the splitting of the outstanding assessments in methods utilized by the Council for assessment splitting by the proper Village Officials and that the Council approve such in order that it may be so recorded for 1972 collection. It should be noted that Homart will ultimately be required to plat its area. We have informed Homart that such a platting will be required prior to occupancy of any building or portion thereof in the center. This will allow Homart to finalize its sales arrange- ments prior to platting. The staff has discussed these provisions with Mr. May and they appear to be acceptable to Homart. f. Councilman Haugan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (Property Division No. 044193) 72- 8- 170 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 68 -9 -177, 69 -9 -155, 70 -9 -130 and - 10 - 8/3 63 -8 -149 of the Village Council of Maplewood, adopted 9/8/69, 9/9/69, 9/1/70 and 8/22/68, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White Bear Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary Sewer No. 6 -1 were levied against the attach- ed list of described properties; said list made a part herein; WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conveyed and are de- scribed according to the attached list, said list made a part herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White Bear Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary Sewer No. 6 -1 against the heretofore mentioned properties be correct- ly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County in the amounts stated on the attached list; said list made a part herein. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. g. Village Engineer Collier stated one additional property division is re- quired as a result of the widening of Beam Avenue. h. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (Property Division No. 043980) 72 -8 -171 WHEREAS, property division numbered 043980 was received and duly in- vestigated; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that assessments regarding said property divisions remain unchanged. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 6. Planned Unit Development - Maplewoods - Final Plat a. Manager Miller stated the proposed final subdivision plat for the Maplewoods area is in accordance with the preliminary plat. Final plat approval is recommended subject to compliance with the preliminary plat approval conditions, prior to the signing of the final plat. b. At this time, Mr. Glass, 1855 Myrtle Street, stated he would like to know about the property at 1806 McKnight Road, owned by Mr. and Mrs. Gill. How did they acquire the 33 feet south of their property. c. Mayor Axdahl stated Ripley Avenue from McKnight Road to Currie Street was vacated. d. Manager Miller stated Maple Woods, Inc, has donated 10 feet of their property for walkway purposes. e. Mayor Axdahl requested Staff to review the situation. - 11 - 8/3 f. Manager Miller stated the Village has a right to investigate the 10 foot easement only. g. Village Planner Seida stated there are two plats involved here, one for the condominums. h. Councilman Greavu moved approval of the final plat for Maplewood Hills Inc. subject to compliance with conditions of the Preliminary Plat approva and no signing of final plat until all conditions are complied with. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. i. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the final plat for the 72 unit condominium subdivision. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 7. Kohlman's Addition - Final Plat a. Manager Miller stated this final plat is in accordance with the approved preliminary plat. A copy of the proposed escrow agreement is included. This project is not serviced by a public water system. Included in the escrow agreement is the installation of a "dry" watermain. b. Councilman Haugan moved approval of the escrow agreement and the final plat of Kohlman's Addition. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 8. Community Design Review Board - Ordinance a. Manager Miller stated at the meeting of July 20, Council placed on first reading an ordinance which corrects the community design review board ord- inance relative to final approval of building plans by the Council. The or- iginal ordinance included contradictory sections relative to this question. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption; ORDINANCE NO. 328 AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND ITS PROCESSES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. 202.120 Community Design Review Board THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA does hereby establish a Community Design Review Board in order to: 1. Encourage the orderly and harmonious growth of the Village. - 12 - 8/3 2. Provide for the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the Village. 3. Maintain the public health, safety and general welfare. 4. Maintain property and improvement values throughout the Village. 5. Encourage the physical development of the Village as intended by the "Plan for Maplewood ". Section 2. 202.130. Purpose of this Ordinance. It is the purpose of this ordinance to: 1. Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a method by which the Village may implement this interdependence to its benefit. 2. Encourage the development of private and public property in harmony with the desired character of the Village and in comformance with the guidelines herein provided with due regard to the public and private interests involved. 3. Foster attainment of those sections of the Villagers "Plan for Maplewood" which specifically refer to the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique assets of this Village and its harmonious development, through encouraging private and public interests to assist in the implementation process. 4. Assure that the public benefits derived from expenditure of public funds for improvement and beautification of streets and other public structures and spaces shall be protected by the excercise of reasonable controls over the character and design of buildings and open spaces to include street landscaping, median strips, parks, etc. Community Design Review Board Duties and Responsibilities The duties of the Community Design Review Board shall be: 1. To review, 2. To recommend approval to Village Council, 3. Cause to be modified, or 4. Recommend denial to Village Council of all proposed developments requiring qualified aesthetic and architectural judgment to the end that the general appearance of all proposed development shall preserve or enhance the physical environment and character of the Village of Maplewood. Section 3. 202.140 Membership The Community Design Review Board shall consist of seven (7) members. One (1) member shall be a Planning Commissioner appointed by the Planning Commission. No Com- mission member shall serve for more than three (3) consecutive years. Six (6) members shall be appointed by the Village Council. Initially, three (3) of the Council appointed members shall serve a one (1) year term. Three (3) of the Council appointed members - 13 - S/3 shall serve a two (2) year term. Council appointed members may serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms. All subsequent appointments or reappointments shall be for a two (2) year term only. The Community Design Review Board chairman shall be chosen annually by the board. Council appointed members shall be as follows: 1. Two (2) architects, if available to serve. 2. Two (2) members shall be from a related design or construction field, i.e. landscape architects, interior designers, planners, civil engineers, contract- ors, appraisers, realtcrsi,etc. 3. All of the above members shall, if applicable, be registered and licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota. 4. Two (2) members of the Community Design Board shall be citizen laymen. All members shall be able to read and interpret architectural drawings and to judge the affects of a proposed building, structure or sign upon the surrounding com- munity. The Director of Community Development, or his designated representative shall serve as secretary of the Board and shall have no voting status. Section 4. 202.150 Staff Review The Community Development Department Staff shall process and review all Community Design Review Board applications and shall act as professional advisors to the Board. Other staff members of the Village may provide advice to the Board depending upon the complexity of the subject and the need for specific expertise. Section 5. 202.160 Community Design Review Area No action shall be taken on an application for the issuance of a building or sign permit for any sign, building or structure in any zoning district in the Village except R -1 for single family dwelling only and their accessory structures, without first re- ceiving the approval of the Community Design Review Board. The Board shall also review and approve, cause to be modified, or deny any matter referred to the Board by the Vil- lage Council or the Planning Commission. The Board shall not review interior designs or layouts of structures. Section 6. 202.170 Meeting Procedure. The Community Design Review Board shall hold regularly scheduled public meetings as directed by the Board. An applicant, upon the filing of an application, shall be advised of the date, time and place of his appearance before the Board. Four (4) members of the board must be present to hold and conduct a formal meet- ing. A majority vote of the members present is sufficient to take action on a submittal. Section 7. 202.180 Required Application and Plan Submittal. An applicant shall submit a Community Design Review Board application form and the - 14 - 8/3 following materials, as applicable to the specific project, (in sufficient quantities as determined by the Board) to the Community Design Review Board. A. A design development plan of the entire project showing: 1. A dimensioned site plan 2. A roof plan of all buildings 3. The location of all existing trees and structures on the project site 4. The location and dimensions of all streets, alleys, and highways both adjacent to and within the project site area 5. The location of all off - street parking and loading facilities and areas 6. The location of points of entry and exit for all vehicular and internal circulation patterns 7. The location of all walls and fences 8. The location of all exterior lighting standards 9. The grading and slopes; where these affect the relationship of the build- ings on the project site and surrounding building adjacent to the project B. Dimensioned architectural drawings which show: 1. An entire plan drawn to scale 2. Elevations including all sides of the proposed project buildings and /or structures, including materials and colors 3. Perspectives, model or other suitable graphic materials at the option of the Board C. Preliminary landscape plans, designating all areas to be landscaped with an indication of both types of materials and their elevations D. Site photographs at the option of the Board Section 8. 202.190 Submittal Evaluation The Community Design Review Board shall review the materials submitted with the application with respect to the following aspects of the proposal: 1. General site utilization 2. General architectural considerations including a review of a. The height, bulk and area of all buildings on the site b. The colors and materials to be used - 15 - 8/3 C, The physical and architectural relationship of the proposal with existing and proposed structures in the area d. The site, layout, orientation and location of all buildings and structures and their relationship with open areas and the topography e. Height, materials, colors and variations in boundary walls, fences or screen plantings f. Appropriateness of sign design and exterior lighting 3. General landscaping considerations 4. Graphics to be used To grant approval of an application the Board shall make the following findings: 1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring or existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neigh- borhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this ordinance and the "Plan for Maplewood ". 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a de- sirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors. The Board in its actions of approval may: 1. Attach any conditions that it deems reasonable to its action of approval. 2. Require the applicant, as a condition, to provide guarantees that the condit- ions of approval will be complied with. Section 9. 202.200 Time for Decision. The Board shall decide and make recommendations to the Village Council on all matters before them within twelve (12) work days after the date of filing of the re- gpired application with the Department of Community Development, except when the ap- plicant consents to an extension of time. If the Board fails to render its decision within the period of twelve (12) working days or any extension thereof consented to by the applicant, then the application shall be forwarded on the 13th day or on the day after the extension ends, to the Village Council for final review and action. Section 10. 202.210 Delegation of Authority The Board may, at its discretion, authorize the Director of Community Development - 16 - 8/3 to approve or cause to be modified sign applications or proposed additions or remodel - ings not exceeding $1,000.00 in construction valuation. Section 11. 202.220 Establishment of Special Community Design Areas. The Board may, from time to time at its discretion, recommend to the Planning Commission that certain special community design review areas and that specific criteria to be considered in reviewing applications for development within said areas be establish- ed. The Planning Commission shall review such recommendations and shall recommend ap- proval, modification or denial of same to the Village Council. The Village Council shall take the final action on all such recommendations and may designate said areas by res- olution. Section 12. 202.230 Appeal A notice of appeal to the Village Council may be filed by any person aggrieved.,or affected by a decision of the Community Design Review Board. The appeal to the Village Council shall include the following: 1. The appeal shall be in writing and received by the Village Clerk within ten (10) calendar days after the Community Design Board's decision is reached. 2. The appeal shall indicate and outline with justifications the reasons why an appeal is requested and why such action taken by the Community Design Review Board acts to create an undue hardship upon the appellant. 3. There shall be an appeal fee of $10.00 which is submitted at the time of filing an appeal in writing to the Village Clerk The Village Council may, on its own motion, also elect to consider any action taken by the Community Design Review Board in the same manner as any appeal would be taken by an aggrieved party. This would require the Village Council to follow the same outlying steps of an appeal in writing within the time allotted and outlining the reasons for the appeal. The Village Council shall, at its next meeting following the filing of an appeal, fix the time for hearing the appeal and give written notice thereof to the appellant and the Community Design Review Board. Section 13. 202.240 Enforcement No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be granted unless the completed work complies with the plans approved and the conditions required by the Community Design Review Board. Section 15. 202.250 Effective Date of Ordinance This ordinance shall take effect and be in force after its passage, approval and publication. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 9. Water Improvement - 11th Avenue (Supplementary Agreement) a. Manager Miller stated during the construction of the Eleventh Avenue water - main project it was necessary to remove some curb and gutter at a total cost - 17 - 8/3 of $372.50. Approval of a supplementary agreement allowing for this work is recommended. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 -8 -172 RESOLVED, by the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota that Supple- mental Agreement No. 2 to the contract for construction of Eleventh Avenue Water Project, 70 -16, in the amount of $372.50 be and hereby is in all things approved. FURTHER, that the Mayor and Clerk be and hereby are authorized and in- structed to execute the said Supplemental Agreement for and on behalf of the Village. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 10. Water Improvement - County Road B (Final Plans) a. Manager Miller stated final plans have been prepared for the County Road B water line between Day Road and Highway 61. Approval of the plans is re- commended and a bid date of August 15 is suggested. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 -8 -173 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the Village Council on June 22, 1972, plans and specifications for County Road "B" Water, No. 72 -9, from Day Road westerly, have been prepared under the direction of the Village Eng- ineer, and he has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the Village Clerk. 2. The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published once, at least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 A.M. on the 15th day of August, 1972 at the Village Hall and that no bids shall be considered by the Council unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 5% of the amount of such bid. - 18 - 8/3 3. The Village Clerk and Village Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular Village Council meeting of August 17, 1972. 4. The advertisement for bids shall be in substantially the following form: ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS The Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota will receive sealed bids for the construction of approximately 650 lineal feet of water main and appurten- ances on County Road "B" from Day Road westerly, Project No. 72 -9. Payment to the contractorshall be by check or cash. Bids will be received until 10:00 A.M., C.D.S.T., on the 15th day of August, 1972 at the Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minn- esota at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened, read aloud and considered. Award of contract will be based on the cost of this project. Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement thereon in- dicating proposal for bid contained within and addressed to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota. Proposals shall be submitted to the Village Clerk on or before the above stated time. Proposals for the furnishing of all labor, equipment and materials and performing all work in conjunction with the above stated construction must be submitted. Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file in the Village Offices, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. Copies of the doc- uments may be obtained by depositing Ten Dollars ($10.00) with the Engineer. The amount of deposit for one set of documents will be refunded to each bid- der who returns the plans and documents in good condition within ten (10) days after the opening of bids. All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond payable to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total bid conditioned that if the bidder is a successful bidder, he will enter into a contract in accordance with said bid and will furnish such performance bonds as are specified. No bidder may withdraw his bid for at least thirty (30) days after the scheduled closing time for the receipt of bids without the consent of the owner. The owner reserves the right to reject or accept any or all bids and to waive any informalities in bidding. Mrs. Lucille Aurelius Village Clerk, Village of Maplewood Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Community Design Review Board (Building) - 19 - 8/3 Councilman Haugan moved to waive the Board to report to the Council, as tl time as board members are appointed. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. a. Jasinski Liquor Store (2730 Stillwater Road) Board until such 1. Manager Miller stated the building plan proposed is for an addition to the Jasinski Liquor store at 2730 Stillwater Road. The addition pro- posed is to the south of the existing building and is for the purpose of storage of retail liquors. Approval of the plans is recommended subject to conditions regarding (1) the removal of a truck, a sign and pole structure and a temporary storage shed, (2) the paving of the parking area, (3) the provision of enclosed waste removal facilities, (4) drive- way locations, (5) removal of an underground petroleum tank and (6) the striping of the off - street parking lot. Mr. Jasinski did pick up the staff report on the afternoon of July 20. The Staff regularly makes it a practice to notify people of the availability of staff reports involv- ing them on the day of the release of the agenda. It should be the re- sponsibility of the applicant to pick up the report and review it prior to the meeting. If the staff report is made available prior to the meet- ing, it is my feeling that any request for reconsideration based upon the failure of an applicant to secure a copy of the staff report or to comment on it is invalid and should not be considered. 2. Mr. Jansinski spoke on behalf of his request and also reviewed the Staff report. 3. Village Planner Seida explained the reasons for the Staff recommend- ations. 4. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the building plans of Jasinski Liquor Store subject to the following conditions: 1. Removal from site of the van truck and contained storage therein on the east side of existing building. 2. Removal of the sign and pole structure located at the southeast corner of existing building. 3. Elimination and removal of temporary storage shed located at south end of property. 4. Paving of area behind new addition to eliminate existing unpaved but parking area. 5. Paving from existing parking lot on the west.up to building. No parking allowed on west building side - such space is needed for traffic aisle movement. 6. Building expansion shall provide container space enclosed for dump- ster facilities for waste removal. 7. The driveway locations on the east side should be eliminated due to traffic hazards. - 20 - 8/3 8. The easterly driveway apron the north (along Stillwater Road) and northerly driveway apron, on the east (along Century Avenue) should be eliminated due to closeness to the hazardous intersection of Stillwater Road and Century Avenue. The need for all curb cuts now existing is unwarranted and present dangerous accident potentials on both abutting streets to the liquor store. 9. The existing underground petrolium tank behind the existing build- ing (to the south in the expansion area) shall be removed and filled in thus eliminating future structure failure potential due to decomposition, collapse, trapped fumes, etc. 10. The off- street parking lot shall be striped and spaces designated in accordance with Municipal Code. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. b. Twin City Tobacco and Candy Company (1065 E. Highway 36) 1. Manager Miller stated the Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company has requested permission to construct a 3200 :'pquarefoot garage to the north of their existing building. Approval of the building plans is recommend- ed. 2. Councilman Greavu moved approval of the addition for the building plans for the Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 3. A representative of Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company stated that the garage will house the trucks at night. C. Schroeder Milk Company 1. Manager Miller stated the Schroeder Milk Company wishes to build an office addition above the existing building. Approval is recommended. 2. Councilman Haugan moved approval of the building plans of the Sch- roeder Milk ComDanv to build an office addition above their existing Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. d. Kroger (1815 North St. Paul Road) 1. Manager Miller stated Gold Bond of Minnesota has requested authority to remodel signs located on the property at 1815 North St. Paul Road. Approval of the request is recommended. 2. Councilman Greavu moved to approve the request of Gold Bond of Minn- esota to remodel signs located at 1815 North St. Paul Road. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. - 21 - 8/3 2. Tree Disposal Service - Proposal (Ecological Conservation Services) a. Manager Miller stated Ecological Conservation Services, Inc., wishes to make a proposal for the disposal and removal of diseased trees in Maplewood. Staff has been informed by John Sauers, President of the organization, that Ecological Conservation Services is a nonprofit organization involving min- ority groups and the handicapped. Mr. Sauers wishes to make a presentation to the Council relative to their services. Staff recommends that the letter be accepted and filed. b. Councilman Greavu moved to accept the Services. Inc. and Dlace it on file. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 3. Street Vacation - Dorle Road (Petition) a. Manager Miller stated staff has received a petition from fifty percent of the property ownerships along Dorle Road (approximately 450 -feet south of County Road D, extending approximately 225 -feet east of Hazelwood). A hear- ing date of September 7 is recommended. b. Councilman Wiegert moved to set a date of September 7, 1972 for the public hearing on the vacation of Dorle Road. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 4. Property Division a. Myra Kruger, 2671 Conway 1. Manager Miller stated Myra Kruger, 2671 Conway, has requested a lot division of Lot 6, Block 7, Farrell addition. Approval of the lot div- ision is recommended subject to the following conditions: (1) A survey of all resulting parcels shall be provided, (2) All outstanding assess- ments shall be paid, (3) The garage remaining on the parcel may not be used as a dwelling, (4) The parcel with the house remaining shall have two 6ffstreet parking spaces and the driveway provided in accordance with the Village Code, and (5) Myra Kruger, as owner shall sign an agreement acknowledging compliance with all conditions. 2. Councilman Wiegert Mvra Kruger for DroDer the lot di roll 'S 1. A survey of all resulting parcels shall be provided 2. All outstanding assessments shall be paid 3. The garage remaining on the parcel may not be used as a dwell- ing 4. The parcel with the house remaining shall have two offstreet parking spaces and the driveway provided in accordance with the Village Code 5. Myra Kruger, as owner, shall sign an agreement acknowledging compliance with all conditions. - 22 - 8/3 Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. b. Libby 1. Manager Miller stated Keith, Jay and Dean Libby have requested that an existing 8.23 acre parcel be divided into at least three parcels to erect three single family dwellings. The Village Code requires formal platting for such a subdivision and further provides that no building permit shall be issued for single dwelling units on any property not having frontage on a public street. The land in question is remote from any public services and would not appear to be ready for development. 2. Dean Libby spoke on behalf of the request. 3. Following further discussion, Councilman Wiegert moved to deny the request of the Libby's for a lot division. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilmen Haugan and Wiegert. Nays - Councilman Greavu. Motion carried. 5. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - County Road B (Petition) a. Manager Miller stated Staff received a petition for the construction of sanitary sewer_ lines in County Road B from the Soo Line Railroad eastward for a distance of 540 -feet. A feasibility report should be requested. b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 8 - 174 WHEREAS, a certain petition has been received by the Village Council for the improvement of the following described area: County Road "B ", from the Soo Line Railroad eastward for a distance of five hundred and forty feet (540'). by construction of sanitary sewer, service connections, appurtenances and street reconstruction; and WHEREAS, the said petition has been declared to be signed by the re- quired percentage of owners of property affected thereby; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the petition as hereinbefore described is hereby referred to the Village Engineer, and he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. - 23 - 8/3 6. Street Closing - Bicycle Ride a. Manager Miller stated arrangements have been made with the City of St. Paul to schedule a bicycle ride for Sunday, August 6 between the hours of 1:00 and 5:00 P.M. St. Paul will close Johnson Parkway from Phalen south to Mounds Park and it is requested that the Village close Ripley Avenue be- tween the entrance to Wakefield Park and East Shore Drive near Phalen Lake. The route will again be signed and residents will still have normal access to their properties. The closing of Ripley Avenue is recommended. b. Councilman Haugan moved approval of the closing of Ripley Avenue for the bicycle ride Sunday, August 6, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 7. Conciliation Court a. Manager Miller presented a resolution which would establish a concili- ation court utilizing our existing Municipal Court. The conciliation court would not involve increased costs to the participating Villages. Citizens of Maplewood are now required to go to St. Paul if they desire conciliation court processes. It is felt that this service will be azValuable-one to the citizens of our community. b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 8 - 175 RESOLUTION CREATING A CONCILIATION COURT ADJUNCT TO THE PRESENT JOINT MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE VILLAGES OF MAPLEWOOD, LITTLE CANADA, VADANIS HEIGHTS AND GEM LAKE WHEREAS, there is a need for a conciliation in the above stated Court, and; WHEREAS, the statutes of the State of Minnesota provide for the munic- ipal creation of a Conciliation Court, M.S.A. 491.040, and; WHEREAS, a Conciliation Court can function in and be of service to the above stated participating Villages of the Joint Municipal Court at no in- crease in costs to said Villages; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Conciliation Court is hereby created pursuant to the above cited Minnesota Statute with no increase in costs to the participating Villages of the said Joint Municipal Court effect- ive October 1st, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 8. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Request for Gravity Sewer (Metropolitan Sewer Board) - 24 - 8/3 a. Manager Miller stated our preliminary sanitary sewer study suggested that Maplewood encourage the MSB to proceed with the construction of a re- placement interceptor for the "White Bear Interceptor" under gravity con- ditions and to locate it along the right -of -way of TH 61 in the Village. This will result in the elimination of many of the Village's lift stations and in savings in future maintenance costs. It is recommended that the resolution be adopted. b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:. 72 -8 -176 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Sewer Board was established to construct and operate the interceptor sewers and wastewater treatment plants in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including the "White Bear Interceptor" which passes through the Village of Maplewood and which collects the wastewater from a major portion of said Village, and WHEREAS, said interceptor sewer was designed and constructed as a tem- porary facility with a ten year anticipated life in 1963, resulting in the current utilization of all available capacity, and WHEREAS, the Village of Maplewood anticipates the opening of a shop- ping center of metropolitan significance within its limits in 1974, which will be tributary to the White Bear Interceptor and will create the need for an additional allocation of capacity of major proportions, and WHEREAS, the original design of said interceptor to operate under pres- sure has necessitated the costly operation and maintenance by the Village of pumping stations to discharge the Village's wastewater thereinto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Sewer Board is requested to proceed immediately on the construction of a replacement inter- ceptor for the inadequate, temporary facility now in operation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Sewer Board is requested to design said interceptor to operate under gravity conditions and to locate this facility generally along the right -of -way of Trunk Highway 61 through the Village of Maplewood, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Sewer Board be requested to have its staff and consultants meet as soon as possible with represent- atives of the Village of Maplewood to discuss this matter and to initiate action on the project. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 9. Tavern License - Gladstone House a. Manager Miller stated Mrs. Donna Funk, owner and operator of the Glad - stone House has applied for a Liquor Display License (Set up). The necessary investigation has been made and found to be in order. Approval is recommended. - 25 - 8/3 b. Councilman Wiegert moved approv Set up) for Mrs. Donna Funk, The Gl Seconded by Councilman Greavu. J. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Ayes - all. 1. Mayor Axdahl stated the Council previously discussed having an elected official representing the area on the County Board's Highway Study Task Force. Councilman Greavu volunteered. 2. Mayor Axdahl stated the Council also received a copy of a letter from the Penn - igers on Ripley. They are having the same problem as the man who appeared here tonight. Staff is to investigate. R. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION 1. Manager Miller stated there had been a meeting Tuesday night with the County regarding open space. The County requests Maplewood to establish a public hearing on open space in the Battle Creek area. If a hearing date is set, when, where, and who should be notified. Council discussed procedures for the meeting and instructed Staff to notify the residents 200 feet surrounding the area involved. Councilman Greavu moved to set School as the public hearing d area. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. L. ADJOURNMENT 11:46 P.M. City Clerk 7:30 P.M. at Carver Element Ayes - all. - 26 - 8/3/702, ..Qe.,.:.y.�y:o1 �i:,.. -�.___ ., s... �..:: w..+.: cs�. � .- ..�r�•,:...c.�:2,4';+.:�ti�wu. J .........- .,,- ....�...........: t:w.�:si�.Lii1_ iyi..�....aw.��Y.;. _w. ✓_.._ uw .�...�..,.c�..,.n..ew..:..i..o. _�.'.L .._ •r . _.i_.....� ....i.L.....t -.:. urwa -.-. 185.41 AFU SERVICE 130.50 AIR COMM 240.00 AIR COMM 49561.38 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 20.00 ARTS TOWING 516.00 H & E PATROL 339920.00 13ARBAROSSA C SONS INC 468.38 BARTON CONTRACTING CO 15.00 13EARS AUTO CLINIC 19286.13 30ARD OF WATER COMM 4.94 30ARD OF WATER COMM 19177.08 BOARD OF WATER COMM 11.64 BOBS OK HARDWARE 89000 CAPITOL SUPPLY CO 275.66 GEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 834.80 J G CHISHOLM 10.11 COAST TO COAST STORES 157.60 COCA -COLA BOTTLING INC 44.79 COMM. LIGHTING PROD INC. 3.00 ROBIN A DEROCKER 7.00 EARTH WORKS 33.00 JAMES EMBERTSON 3.00 PATRICIA Y FERRAllO 14.00 GATEWAY GLASS CO REPAIR &MAINT., VEHICLE AND - REPAIR &MAINT., EQUIPMENT REPAIR &MAINT., RADIO REPAIR &MAINT., RADIO BOND, INTEREST AND -OTHER CHARGES FEES FOR SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE CONSTRUCTION FUND MAINTENANCE MATERIALS REPAIREMAINT., VEHICLE CONSTRUCTION FUND UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION FUND SUPPLIES, PROGRAM AND - MAINTENANCE MATERIALS REPAIR&MAINT., RADIO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS FEES FOR SERVICE MAINTENANCE MATERIALS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM REP. &MAINT., BUILDINGCGRND 'TRAVEL & TRAINING SUPPLIES, PROGRAM SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPORARY TRAVEL .& TRAINING SUPPLIES, OFFICE 1306 3.00 GENIE SALES & SERVICE SUPPLIES, OFFICE 1307 360-12 GLADSTONE LUMBER MART SUPPLIES, PROGRAM AND- MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1308 12.60 GROSS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL 1309 859.31 GULF OIL CORP FUEL & OIL 1310 37.00 HOCHSTEIN CELLO BAG CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1311 14.00 HOME GAS CO INC MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1312 33.00 INFINITE GRAPHIC SUPPLIES, OFFICE 1313 318.00 INTL BUSINESS MACHINES RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 1314 200.00 INTL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIP 1315 2.28 JONATHAN STORES INC SUPPLIES, PROGRAM .316 108.78 LARRYS AUTO GLASS CO REPAIREMAINT., EQUIPMENT AND- REPAIREMAINT., VEHICLE ,17 16.18 LEES AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT I MENT 318 19.29 LUGER MERCANTILE CO SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 319 20.00 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 320 289342.14 METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD RENTAL, SEWER AND- CONTRACT PAYMENT 321 166.80 MIDWAY FORD CO REPAIR&MAINT., VEHICLE AND °SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 322 31.00 MIDWAY TRACTOR & EQUIP CO REPAIR &MAINT., VEHICLE 323 102.75 MPLS CITY TREASURE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY S24 100.00 3 M COMPANY M133864 EQUIPMENT, OTHER 125 200.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIP 126 3096.02 MINN HOSPITAL ASSOC CONTRIBUTIONS, INSURANCE AND- HOSPITALIZATION WIH ,27 203.69 MIRACLE EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT, OTHER 8 171770.00 ERWIN MONTOMERY CONSTR CO i CONSTRUCTION FUND 29 32.90 MOORE BUSINESS.FORMS INC SUPPLIES, OFFICE ...,«�.......�. ...�.., ... ..,_. ..,_�. ,... `:: �: kw. r.._.. �.. i_... i..._...,...... a... �a`, b' iw-.. �. r....:.. �a.. �. �....-_.. wn-. ,.�i.»....._.......�..,�..�4s�r Y ^w.:.GRuc.a...ci.::.. ,..:.�.e:iuu..i ». ��......,.... ......: _..av �....��.»...�......+..... 137.85 737.00 35.40 2.00 8.25 149.40 4.36 6.85 5.35 4.50 15.00 29581.00 61.20 214.50 57.81 48.75 484.50 4, 500. 13 228.50 32.50 112.50 70.00 41.50 284.50 34.92 v.c= MOTOTOLA C C E INC EUGENE MURRAY NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERV NORTHERN STATES POWER CO NORTHWESTERN BELL TE CO NORTHWESTERN BELL TE CO NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO INC OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC . REPAIREMAINT., RADIO FEES FOR SERVICE SUPPLIES, OFFICE UTILITIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE SUPPLIES, VEHICLE FUEL C OIL PIONEER RIM C WHEEL CO SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT REED TIRE SALES INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE EDWARD REINERT SUPPLIES, PROGRAM RYAN- WENZEL INC CONSTRUCTION FUND S C T OFFICE PROD SUPPLIES, OFFICE JEANNE SCHADT ELECTION EXPENSE RICHARD W SCHALLER TRAVEL 6 TRAINING SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL CHEMICALS SEARS ROEBUCK S CO BUILDING, IMPROVEMENT SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC EQUIPMENT, OTHER SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC ESCROW FUND SMALL ENGINE REPAIR REPAIR&MAINT., EQUIPMENT ST PAUL PISTOL CLUB INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT ST PAUL E SUBURBAN BUS CO FEES FOR SERVICE SUPERAMERICA FUEL S OIL TEAM ELECTRONICS SUPPLIES, PRCGRAM AND- EQUIPMENT, OTHER TRUCK UTILITIES 6 MFG CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND- REPAIREMAINT., VEHICLE 22.10 16. 15 66.0 5 35.00 35.00 3.00 10.50 344.00 47.03 253.11 141.23 125.00 11.66 56.00 60.00 42.00 49.00 14.00 46.25 105.00 43.00 56.00 154.35 63.00 349.53 TWENTIETH CENTURY PRINTING SUPPLIES, OFFICE TWIN CITY FILTER SERV INC REP. &MAINT., BUILDING &GRND UNITED MAILING CO SUPPLIES, PROGRAM VALS BODY SHOP REPAIR &MAINT., VEHICLE WAHL & WAHL INC SUPPLIES, OFFICE WASHINGTON CNTY TREASURER FEES FOR SERVICE WEBER & TORSETH INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE AND- REPAIR &PAINT., VEHICLE WESTERN AIRLINES TRAVEL C TRAINING WHEELER HARDWARE CO REP. &PAINT., BUILDING£GRND AND - EQUIPMENT, OTHER WHITE BEAR DODGE INC REPAIR &MAINT. VEHICLE. ICf.E 1 XEROX SUPPLIES, OFFICE XEROX SUPPLIES, OFFICE ZAYRE SHOPPERS CITY SUPPLIES, PROGRAM THOMAS ARTH SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY JANE S BAILEY SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY I TERRY BEEBE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY LAWRENCE BOWMAN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRAR Y � JOSEPH BROWN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY i WILLIAM CONLEY SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY HOWARD CORTY SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY MARY DEAN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY I NICHOLAS DEROSE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY I SHERRI DOTEN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY* GARY EGAN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY JOHN'ERICKSON SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY I .,........ o...,__•_` �__�__.,._..'+........�_.�Sa;.. ._,_..._........ ,....::...<...___._ �_ �ow7:.,..,......----_.. i. �...._...,. t+,._ w. a�_._. �.....:. �_>........._..,.. a...,. s.... �....»,. a. �...,...: z:,__....._...... i� ..._._._...Y:- .- .s.a,ar�si.��� a. B0 85.75 KATHLEEN FERRAllO SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY B1 149.10 MARTHA FISCHBACK SALARIES E WAGES,TEMPCRARY AND- TRAVEL & TRAINING B2 14.00 RALPH FLAUGHER SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 83 63.00 GERALD GOROCKI SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 84 65.00 CHARLES HELGATE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 85 139.65 PATRICIA KRESCH SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 86 5.20 JACK HORNER TRAVEL & TRAINING 87 141.00 SHAWN JAHNKE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 88 145.43 30NA6D KRAMLINGER SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY AND- TRAVEL & TRAINING 89 218.95 JUDY KRUSKOPF SALARIES & WAGES,TEMf'CRARY AND-TRAVEL & TRAINING 30 10.20 DAVID G LANGNESS SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY AND- TRAVEL & TRAINING 91 95.00 ROBERT MALLARY SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 92 60.00 KATHY MAYAR SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 93 147.60 WILLIAM MERRIMAN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 94 77.00 MICHAEL MONN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 195 60.00 CHYRL MOORELAN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY ,96 60.00 CONNIE MOORE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY i97 134.89 PAUL MUELLER SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY X98 94.60 DONNA NEELY 'SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 199 150.15 KATHLEEN 0 BRIEN SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY r00 131.25 KARL OELKER SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 01 241.15 JAMES ORKE SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY X02 147.53 ROBERT PATES SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 03 238.75 DIANE PETERSON SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY FWOD D ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATE 08-03-72 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S 60.00 JAE RANSZHA SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPCRARY 56.00 LAWRENCE ROSS SALARIES E WAGES,TEMPCRARY 148.11 NANCY REUTER SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY 60.00 JOHN RICHARDSON SALARIES C WAGES,TEMPCRARY 122.94 DEBBIE KAY RICHART SALARIES C WAGES,TEMPCRARY 143.00 CYNTHIA ROTH SALARIES C WAGES,TEMPORARY 106.75 JOHN SCHARFFBILLIG SALARIES E WAGES,TEMPCRARY 162.80 CHARLES SAXTON SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPCRARY AND -TRAVEL E TRAINING 131.50 GABRIELLE SCOTT SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 99.75 DEAN SPEESE II SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPORARY 134.44 LEE STEINCAMP SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPCRARY 173.25 CHERI STRAND SALARIES E WAGES,TEMPCRARY 240.25 MARGARET WALZ SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPCRARY AND -TRAVEL C TRAINING 14.00 CALVIN WESBROOK SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPCRARY 84.00 CHARLES WIGER SALARIES S WAGES,TEMPCRARY 3.00 MRS ROBERT BADE REFUNDS 3.00 SALLY A FOATE REFUNDS 3.00 MRS BARBARA OLSON REFUNDS 107.25 BANN SUPPLIES, OFFICE 169103.57 KIRKHAM MICHAEL FEES FOR CONSULTING 7.97 LABELLES SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 10.00 ROBERT W MOORE CO CONSTRUCTION FUND 6.00 PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE SUBSCRLPTIONS C MEMBERSHIP 5.00 SNYDER BROTHERS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 29.68 STOUVALLS MOTOR HOTELS TRAVEL C TRAINING :001282 THRU 001428 GRAND TOTAL 147 CHECKS TOTALING 174 CHECKS TOTALING 128,429.97 609,268.38 „gvs66_a...� .v...... _.�,�a. �+ ._ i.e.. ..y �... _a air.. Ir. .. �... ..-... �- .i..., .. .... �. .. ,. ..vN .� ..,.e... r.. ... _�1fCla a..... �....�' .a.-.. ..�.> .+...- d•Ya.J .._�/ �._...w ..._. ... r.. v..sr _.., �.✓.L[WrW�r tuu+ -. / I a # A M U U N 7 L A t M A 11 1 v +2 100.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA BOOKS & PERIODICALS +3 10.00 FIRE ENGINEERING BOOKS & PERIODICALS +4 160.92 GEM SUPPLIES, OFFICE AND- SUPPLIES, PROGRAM '5 30.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FEES FOR SERVICE 46 21.50 RADISSON RESERVATION SERV TRAVEL & TRAINLNG (t7 11141.75 TABULATING SERV BUREAU FEES FOR SERVICE AND - RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 48 200.00 NORTH ST PAUL CHILDRENS FEES FOR SERVICE 49 49416.30 FIRST STATE BANK OF ST FEDERAL TAX W/H 50 11809.80 MINN COMM OF TAXATION STATE TAX W/H 51 11105.50 CITY & CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION W/H 52 66,00 JANE S BAILEY SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPrRARY 53 105.00 COW -TOWN FEES FOR SERVICE 54 10.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIP 55 91901.00 R A LUXENBURG CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION FUND 56 23.61 UNITED STATES LEASING CORP RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 57 21083.50 LAIS & BANNINGAN FEES FOR SERVICE 58 11914.59 LAIS & BANNINGAN FEES FOR SERVICE AND- CONSTRUCTION FUND X59 11601.62 STATE OF MINNESOTA CONTRIBUTIONS, RETIREMENT AND- P.E.R.A. W/H ,60 21895.02 STATE OF MINNESOTA -CONTRIBUTIONS, RETIREMENT AND- P.E.R.A. W/H 161 2.25 INSTY PRINTS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM )62 75.00 GOODRICH GOLF COURSE FEES FOR SERVICE 63 54.00 SPRING LK PARK REC CENTER FEES FOR SERVICE 54 46.22 LUCILLE AURELIUS POSTAGE AND - PRISONER CARE 15665 15666 15667 15668 4451406.25 FIRST STATE BANK OF STP 4,665.25 FIRST STATE BANK OF STP 11887.83 MINN COMM OF TAXATION 11105.50 CITY E CTY CREDIT UNION PURCHASE OF INVESTMENTS FEDERAL TAX W/H STATE TAX W/H CREDIT UNION W/H NECESSARY DIRECT EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING SUB -TOTAL 27 CHECKS TOTALING 4809838.41 I ,11 i PAYROLL AUGUST 3. 1972 ITEM NO. CHECK NO. CLAIMANT AMOUNT 1. 4801 Robin A. DeRocker $ 308.18 2. 4802 Vivian R. Lewis 207.49 3. 4803 Michael G. Miller 569.19 4. 4804 Donald W. Ashworth 364.88 5. 4805 Lucille E. Aurelius 273.35 6. 4806 Phyllis C. Green 197.36 7. 4807 Arline J. Hagen 171.12 8. 4808 Alfred J. Peloquin 227.59 9• 4809 Betty D. Se.lvog 211.16 10. 4810 Lydia'A. Smail 158.00 11. 4811 Rita C. Smith 158.38 12. 4812 David L. Arnold 320.34 13. 4813 John H. Atchison 308.74 14. 4814 Ronald D. Becker 267.54 15. 4815 Anthony G. Catianes 379.47 16. 4816 Dale K. Clauson 286.77 17. 4817 Kenneth V. Collins 342.88 18. 4818 Dennis S. Cusick 347.88 19. 4819 Dennis J. Delmont 308.75 f X20. 4820 Richard C. Dreger 316.25 x'121. 4821 Raymond E. Fernow 278.43 22. 4822 Patricia Y. Ferrazzo 223.15 23. 4823 David M.Graf 307.56 24. 4824 Niorman ,L:•. Green 322.88 25. 4825 Thomas L. Hagen 406.79 26. 4826 Kevin R. Halweg 229.13 27. 4827 Michael J. Herbert 264.81 28. 4828 James T. Horton 293.37 29. 4829 Donald V. Kortus 199.49 30. 4830 Richard J. Lang 279.80 31. 4831 Roger W. Lee 301.97 32. 4832 John J. McNulty 319.05 33. 4833 John A. Melander 294.15 34. 4834 Richard M. Moeschter 294.67 35. 4835 Robert D. Nelson 333.85 36. 4836 William F. Peltier 240.80 37. 4837 Dale E. Razskazoff 247.21 38. 4838 Richard W. Schaller 446.41 39. 4839 Robert E. Vorwerk 277.29 40. 4840 Duane J. Williams 292.25 41. 4841 Joel A. White 57.81 42. 4.842 Joseph A. Zappa 418.41 43. 4843 Donald W. Skalman 280.34 44. 4844 Gregory L. Stafne 276.46 45. 4845 Maureen A. DeGroot 148.90 046. 4846 Pamela J. Schneider 154.70 8/3/72 .yy lt.o}bI� ..^.: iiitu3. 4r... ':..._u.a,�e......u._.�a.....,. .l_. � . .:: ' -:�' . • : '.. :. 1't ... .. ....'.. . �''. s .x.. .�. � _. •.�+.5[.», .. _ _ __ - •_. �sJ�...... �_ �: SfS:.. ..s.s_- w>��++S:ura�s...tsa..u.. �a a.�.. ...�._�.1wLd.Y.o.. a..i. ....... :.L�:.� ._... n' t. aW. 6... w....._. a��. �v.. ��. �a- C.•'.... r: ��r•.�l.rt:i�.:.��:_'a..n_.f�.t _�'_u....�........._r•.�+�.a. - ...r.._ ITEM NO. CHECK NO. CLAIMANT AMOUNT 1 42'.. 4847 Marcella M. Mottaz $ 177.43 48. 4848 Alfred C. Schadt 360.74 49. 4849 Frank J. Sailer 137.38 50. 4850 Bobby D. Collier 550.88 51. 4851 William C. Cass 346.96 52. 4852 James G. Elias 217.51 53. 4853 Raymond J. Hite, JR. 442.22 54. 4854 Dennis L. Peck 218.97 55. 4855 Janet A. Rois 173.74 56. 4856 Patrick Jones, Jr. 175.14 57. 4857 Bernard A. Kaeder 326.49 58. 4858 Raymond J. Kaeder 274.78 59. 4859 Henry F. Klzt.sing 257.30 60. 4860 Gerald W.Meyer 251.79 61. 4861 Joseph W. Parnell 271.57 62. 4862 Arnold H. Pfarr 280.00 63. 4863 Joseph B. Prettner 381.69 64. 4864 Edward A. Reinert 287.83 65. 4865 Greg J. Bailey 179.18 66. 4866 Anthony T. Barilla,Jr. 143.48 67. 4867 Myles R. Burte 252.03 68. 4868 Herbert R. Pi.rrung 405.88 0 69. 4869 Stanley E. Weeks 237.95 70. 4870 David Germain 248.81 71. 4871 Timothy J. Finberg 149.95 72. 4872 Kevin B. McNulty 216.19 73. 4873 Lawrence B. Mike 181.60 74. 4874 Henry C. Pfarr 165.02 75. 4875 Stephen J. Prettner 148.21 76. 4876 Frank R. Kirsebom 324.34 77. 4877 Anthony T. Barilla 268.29 78. 4878 Richard J. Bartholomew 260.99 79. 4879 LaVerne S. Nuteson 240.80 80. 4880 Gerald C. Owen 283.25 81. 4881 Walton S. Madland 158.22 82. 4882 Thomas C. Rowan 160.98 83. 4883 JoAnn C. Christensen 181.05 84. 4884 John P. Joyce' 334.01 85. 4885 Eric J. Blank 282.72 86. 4886 Bailey A. Seida 411.48 87. 4887 Judy M. Chlebeck 181.99 88. 4888 Lester G. Axdahl 163.18 89. 4889 John C. Greavu 132.49 90. 4890 Harald L. Haugan 124.69 91. 4891 Patricia L. Olson 124.69 92. 4892 Donald J. Wiegert 124.69 93. 4893 Clifford J. Mottaz 227.98 Check No. 4801 through Check No. 4893 TOTAL $24,367.56