HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-1972AGENDA
Maplewood Village Council
7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 3, 1972
Municipal Administration Building
Meeting 72 - 26
(A) CALL TO ORDER
(B) ROLL CALL
(C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes No. 72 -23 (July 13)
2. Minutes No. 72 -24 (July 20)
3. Minutes No. 72 -25 (July 27)
(D) PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
(E) AWARDING OF BIDS
1. Tractor Park)
2. Corrugated Metal Pipe (County Ditch 17)
3. Street Improvement - Conway and McKnight
(F) APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
G) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
(H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Dump Permit (Reconsideration) - County Road C
2. Park Plan - Gethsemane Park /School
3. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - East of Arcade Street in the
vicinity of County Road B
4. Special Use Exception - 1175 East Highway 36
...........................
5. Property Division and Assessment Split
6. Planned Unit Development (Maplewoods) - Final plat
7. Kohlman's Addition - Final plat
8. Community Design Review Board - Ordinance (adoption)
9. Water Improvement - 11th Avenue
(Supplemental agreemc
10. Water Improvement - County Road B (Final plans)',
(I) NEW BUSINESS
1. Community Design Review Board (Building Plan Re
a. Jasinski Liquor Store (2730 Stillwater Roac
b. Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company (1065 F
36)
C. Schroeder Milk Company (2080 Rice Street)
d. Kroger (1815 North St. Paul Road)
2. Tree Disposal Service - Proposal (Ecological Conserva
Services)
3. Street Vacation - Dorle Road (Petition)
4. Property Divisions
5. Water and Sanitary Sewer Improvement - County Road B'
(Petition)
6. Street Closing - Bicycle ride
7. Conciliation Court
8. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Request for gravity sewE
(Metropolitan Sewer Board)
9. Tavern License - Gladstone House
(J) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
(L) ADJOUP-NMENT
ADDENDUM TO THE AGENDA
Meeting 72 - 26
I T E M
E -1 Three thousand dollars is included in the 1972 Budget for
this item.
E -2* This pipe is for the installation and replacement of culverts
for County Ditch 17. Quotations were received from three
pipe companies. Acceptance of the low quotation from Armco
is recommended.
E -3 Bids for this project were taken on July 31 by the County.
I£ the bids are in order and accepted by the County, we
would reccmmend Village Council concurrence in the award for
this project. It is my understanding that the bids are far
below the estimated cost of the project.
H -1 Persons in the area of this dump permit requested reconsider-
ation of the issuance of the permit.
H -2 The Council had referred this matter back to the staff to re-
view alternate methods of constructing facilities in this
area. A presentation will be made at the meeting. The
findings of the staff review are that if the park is to be
fully utilized, there is no choice but to utilize the original
plan.
H -3 It is recommended that Milner W. Carley and Associates be
retained as the project engineers for this installation. That
company was utilized for the surveying portion and it is felt
that it can more efficiently design the project. Final plans
will be ready for the project and a bid opening date of
August 23 is recommended. Property owners in the area have
been notified that this item will be on the agenda.
H -4* The applicants are requesting a special exemption from the M -1
(light manufacturing) zone for the buildings addressed as
1175 and 1195 East Highway 36 to allow for "general office
and business use". There are two existing offices being
operated out of the building at 1175 East Highway 36 at the
present time. The applicant is operating one office space
for the purposes of showing and protecting the property.
We agree that this use is acceptable under zoning regulations
for the purposes of selling the property. The other office
is not being operated for this purpose and does require a
special exception as does the use of the entire buildings for
the stated purposes. The building located at 1175 was con-
structed under a permit showing its use as "commercial ".
This use was never sanctioned by a special exception by the
Village Council. The proposed land use plan does envision
such use of this property; however, the land use at this time is
still in the "proposed" stage and has not been finally adopted
by either the Planning Commission or the Council. The Council
has determined that special exceptions from M -1 zoning do
come within the realm of the moratorium established by the
Council. In addition, the applicants are not making a
specific proposal, but rather wish a general approval of a
general usage. Such a general allowance is only given by a
zone change and not a special exception permit. The applicants
wish to sell the property and are not proposing a specific
use for themselves. It is recommended that a decision on the
special exception request be held in abeyance until the
expiration of the moratorium, and that the applicants be
informed that at that time they should either present a
specific request or consider requesting a zone change.
H -5* The major property owners in the area of the Homart development
have agreed among themselves, as a result of a need to adjust
property Lines in multiple areas around the perimeter of the
Homart tract, to combine all properties involved for ease of
adjustment and then to reissue and record a revised description.
In this way they would eliminate the multiple fragment of
property descriptions that would have resulted in their first
proposal. The Village Attorney's Office has reviewed the
situation and has advised us that the State law which excludes
_platting of tracts of more than five acres would effect this
situation in the following manner: (1) the resulting parcel.
owned by Homart would not be subject to our platting code _re-
quirements due to the fact that its total lot size will exceed
five acres and (2) the Korstad parcel which would be accepted
out of this transfer will be less than five acres and will,
therefore, be subject to our platting code requirements. In
November of 1971, Korstad and Homart jointly divided ownership
and the frontage pattern which resulted in the need for the
splitting of assessments for the improvement of White Bear
Avenue along the frontage of the property. The redistribution
of these assessments was not possible until the Village had
approved the platting of the Korstad property. No such
application was made and the assessments were not redistributed.
Now to combine all properties Ramsey County desires the assess-
ments split figures so that the total 1971 taxes can be paid.
It is recommended that the assessments be computed and ordered
distributed by the Council in accordance with their distribution
policies. In the case of the proposed property division, it
is recommended that a variance from Section 1008 of the Platting
Code be granted which waives the requirements of formal platting
for the Korstad property. Such a waiver should be subject to
the following conditions:
1. There shall be a written legal description of the
parcel furnished to the Village;
2. The parcel shall waive its claims to any curb cut
vehicle access points directly onto or off -of or.
within 200 -feet of White Bear Avenue;
3. The Homart parcel shall provide a reciprocal easement
agreement to the Korstad parcel which provides access
routes to the Korstad parcel to and from White Bear
Avenue, and further such agreement shall be reviewed
and approved as to form by the Village Attorney;
-2-
4. The Korstad parcel shall provide a lot division fee
of $20.00 in accordance with Village requirements to
defray expenses in adjusting all its records and
accounts relating to the properties;
5. Any further ownership division within property lines
of the Korstad parcel shall not be allowed or
recognized by the Village accept by way of formal
plat under the Village Code; and
6. Korstad and Homart shall agree in writing to the
appropriate conditions relating to the Korstad
parcel and such written agreement shall be filed
with the Village.
As a result of the refiling of the new description with Ramsey
County will be necessary to again officially split the White
Bear Avenue levied assessments based upon the new property
descriptions. It. is recommended that the Village authorize
the splitting of the outstanding assessments in methods
utilized by the Council for assessment splitting by the
proper Village officials and that the Council approve such
in order that it may be so recorded for 1972 collection. It
should be noted that Homart will ultimately be required to
plat its area. We have informed Homart that such a platting
will be required prior to occupancy of any building or portion
thereof in the center. This will allow Homart to finalize
its sales arrangements prior to platting. The staff has
discussed these provisions with Mr. May and they appear to
be acceptable to Homart.
H -6* The proposed final subdivision plat for the Maplewoods area
is in accordance with the preliminary plat. Final plat
approval is recommended subject to compliance with the pre-
liminary plat approval conditions prior to the signing of
the final plat.
H -7* This final plat is in accordance with the approved preliminary
plat. A copy of the proposed escrow agreement is included.
This project is not serviced by a public water system.
Included in the escrow agreement is the installation of a
"dry" watermain.
H -8 At your meeting of July 20, you placed on first reading an
ordinance which corrects the community design review board
ordinance relative to final approval of building plans by
the Council. The original ordinance included contradictory
sections relative to this question.
H -9* During the construction of the Eleventh Avenue watermain pro-
ject it was necessary to remove some curb and gutter at a
total cost of $372.50. Approval of a supplementary agreement
allowing for this work is recommended.
H -10* Final plans have been prepared for the County B water line
between Day Road and Highway 61. Approval of the plans is
recommended and a bid date of August 15 is suggested.
-3-
I -la* The building plan proposed is for an addition to the Jasinski
Liquor store at 2730 Stillwater Road. The addition proposed
is to the south of the existing building and is for the pur-
pose of storage of retail liquors. Approval of the plans is
recommended subject to conditions regarding (1) the removal
of a truck, a sign and pole structure and a temporary storage
shed, (2) the paving of the parking area, (3) the provision
of enclosed waste removal facilities, (4) driveway locations,
(5) removal of an underground petroleum tank and (6) the
striping of the off - street parking lot. Mr. Jasinski did pick
up the staff report on the afternoon of July 20. We regularly
make it a practice to notify people of the availability of
staff reports involving them on the day of the release of the
agenda. It should be the responsibility of the applicant to
pick up the report and review it prior to the meeting. If
the staff report is made available prior to the meeting, it
is my feeling that any request for reconsideration based upon
the failure of an applicant to secure a copy of the staff re-
port or to comment on it is invalid and should not be con -
sidered.
I -lb* The Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company has requested per-
mission to construct a 3200 square foot garage to the north
of their existing building. Approval of the building plans
is recommended.
I -lc* The Schroeder Milk Company wishes to build an office addition
above the existing building. Approval is recommended.
I -ld* Gold Bond of Minnesota has requested authority to remodel signs
located on the Kroger property. Approval of the request is
recommended.
I -2* Ecological Conservation Services Inc. wishes to make a pro-
posal for the disposal and removal of diseased trees in
Maplewood. A copy of that proposal is enclosed. We have been
informed by John Sauers, President of the organization, that
Ecological Conservation Services is a nonprofit organization
involving minority groups and the handicapped. Mr. Sauers
wishes to make a presentation to the Council relative to their
services. We would recommend that any action on the part of
the Council be delayed for further staff review.
I -3 We have received a petition from fifty percent of the property
ownerships along Dorle Road (approximately 450 -feet south of
County Road D,extending approximately 225 -feet east of Hazel-
wood). A hearing date of September 7 is recommended.
I -4* Myra Kruger, 2671 Conway, has requested a lot division of Lot 6,
Block 7, Farrell addition. Approval of the lot division is
recommended subject to the following conditions: (1) A survey
of all resulting parcels shall be provided, (2) All outstanding
assessments shall be paid, (3) The garage remaining on the
parcel may not be used as a dwelling, (4) The parcel with the
house remaining shall have two offstreet parking spaces and
the driveway provided in accordance with the Village Code, and
Q�
(5) Myra Kruger, as owner shall sign an agreement acknowledging
compliance with all conditions.
Keith, Jay and Dean Libby have requested that an existing 8.23
acre parcel be divided into at least three parcels to erect
three single family dwellings. The Village Code requires
formal platting for such a subdivision and further provides
that no building permit shall be issued for single dwelling
units on any property not having frontage on a public street.
The land in question is remote from any public services and
would not appear to be ready for development.
I -5* We have received a petition for the connection of water and
sanitary sewer lines in County Road B from the Soo Line Rail-
road eastward for a distance of 540 -feet. A feasibility
report should be requested.
I -6 Arrangements have been made with the City of St. Paul to
schedule a bicycle ride for Sunday, August 6 between the hours
of 1:00 and 5:00 P.M. St. Paul will close Johnson Parkway
from Phalen south to Mounds Park and it is requested that the
Village close Ripley Avenue between the entrance to Wakefield
Park and East Shore Drive near Phalen Lake. The route will
again be signed and residents will still have normal access
to their properties. The closing of Ripley Avenue is rec-
commended.
I -7* Enclosed is a resolution which would establish a conciliation
court utilizing our existing Municipal Court. The conciliation
court would not involve increased costs to the participating
Villages. Citizens of Maplewood are now required to go to
St. Paul if they desire conciliation court processes. It is
felt that this service will be a valuable one to the citizens
of our community.
I -8* our preliminary sanitary sewer study suggested that Maplewood
encourage the MSB to proceed with the construction of a
replacement interceptor for the "White Bear Interceptor"
under gravity conditions and to locate it along the right -of-
way of TH 61 in the Village. This will result in the
elimination of many of the Village's lift stations and in
savings in future maintenance costs. It is recommended that
the resolution which is enclosed be adopted.
I -9 The Gladstone House has requested a tavern license. Approval
is recommended.
-5-
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD VILLAGE COUNCIL
7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 3, 1972
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 72 -26
A CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was
held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order
at 7:34 P.M. by Mayor Axdahl.
B. ROLL CALL
Lester G. Axdahl, Mayor
John C. Greavu, Councilman
Harald L. Haugan, Councilman
Patricia L. Olson, Councilwoman
Donald J. Wiegert, Councilman
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes No. 72 -23 (July 13, 1972)
Present
Present
Present
Present, excused at 9:25 P.M.
Present
Councilman Haugan moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -23 (July 13,
1972) be approved as corrected:
Page 2: Item C 1 -f, Revise the motion to read "Council wants more
information about H.R.A., the feasibility
study for utilities for the area is not ready
and with the understanding that "when taken
from the table" similar notification will again
be given to the area residents of the surround-
ing area."
Item C 1 -g, insert "institution of"
Item.,C 1 -h, delete paragraph
Page 3: Item D -4, "alignments" instead of "locations"
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert, Ayes - all.
2. Minutes No. 72 -24 (July 20, 1972)
Councilman Greavu moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -24 (July 20,
1972) be approved as corrected:
Page 3: Item E 3 -b: Revise resolution 72 -7 -158.
Page 14: Item 8, add "Both Councilmen Greavu and Wiegert agreed
that it had been their understanding and intent-
ion that a permanent access road to the south
was one of the conditions of Phase I of Forest
Green Development."
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
- 1 - 8/3
3. Minutes No. 72 -25 (July 27, 1972)
Councilman Wiegert moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -25 (July
27, 1972) be approved as submitted.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
E. AWARD OF. BIDS
1. Tractor (Park)
a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated that Staff recommends the bid be
awarded to Reed Sales for the purchase of a Simplicity Tractor Machine.
The amount of $3,000.00 is included in the 1972 Budget for this item.
b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
72 - 8 - 165
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the bid of Reed's Sales and Service in the amount of $3,000.00 is the low-
est responsible bid for One (1) Model 4040 Tractor and Accessories, and the
Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with said bidder for and on behalf of the Village.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
2. Corrugated Metal Pipe (County Ditch 17)
a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated this pipe is for installation and
replacement of culverts for County Ditch 17, quotations were received
from three pipe companies. Acceptance of the low bid from Armco is
recommended.
b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
72 - 8 - 166
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that
the quotation of Armco Steel Corporation for furnishing culvert pipe for
the construction of culverts for County Ditch #17, is the lowest respon-
sible bid, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the Village.
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
3. Street Improvement - Conway and McKnight
a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated bids for this project were taken
on July 31 by the County. If the bids are in order and accepted by
the County, Staff recommends Village Council concurrence in the award
for this project.
- 2 - 8/3
b. Floyd Snyker, Assistant Ramsey County Engineer, stated Alexander
Construction Company was low bidder at $317,000.00. This is a project
entered into jointly by the County and the Village. The Commissioner
of Highways is acting as County Agent in awarding the contracts.
c. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
72 -8 -167
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD
1. That the Village of Maplewood concurs with the Ramsey County
Board in its action dated July 31, 1972 recommending an award of contract
in the amount of $317,099.15 to the Alexander Construction Co., Inc, for
the reconstruction and signalization of the intersection of Conway Avenue
and McKnight Road, Projects 62- 668 -10 and 62- 668 -11;
2. That the Village of Maplewood assents to the Commissioner of High-
ways of the State of Minnesota acting as Contracting Agent;
3. That the Village of Maplewood reconfirms its previous undertaking
to contribute up to $160,000.00 to this project of which $50,000.00 is to
be assessed directly to the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company,
it being understood that design and engineering heretofore expended is in-
cluded in said $160,000.00 upset figure.
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
d. Councilman Greavu questioned Mr. Snyker regarding Highway 212
alignment.
Mr. Snyker stated that the East Area Corridor Study, for all facts and
purposes, is dead. The County will be coming to the Village with their
own recommendations as to what should be done. The County is involved
in another "Task Force Study" for the area of Century Avenue, Larpenteur,
County Road F, etc. The County has requested resolutions from all the
municipalities involved to request the Metro Council for their support.
Meetings are set up every Wednesday from 4:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. at the
Highway Garage at Rice and I -694.
F. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS
Councilman Greavu
f�[. 7��: I�jiiiS� .SRITif.'L�i�t.7t4sL•7e�
Seconded by Councilman Haugan.
VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
None.
rough Check No. 1428 - $1
- $480,838,41: Part II -
$24,367.56) in the amount
Ayes - all.
- 3 - 8/3
- Fees. Ser-
H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Dump Permit - (Reconsideration) - County Road C
a. Acting Manager Ashworth stated that persons in the area of this dump
permit requested that Council reconsider the issuance of the permit.
Council moved to reconsider at a previous meeting.
b. Mayor Axdahl asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the recon-
sideration.
Mr. Roger Stanke stated the neighborhood had met as a group a week ago.
They have reorganized the conditions for the fill permit. They discussed
the matter and did come to an agreement.
c. Mr. Gary Bowman, representing the residents of the area,reviewed the
suggested revisions to the conditions. The neighbors wish to add an
additional condition stating that no diseased trees will be placed at
the dump site.
d. Mr. Don McClellan, 961 E. County Road B, spoke in favor of the pro-
posed changes for the conditions.
e. Following further discussion, Councilwoman Olson moved approval of
the dump fill permit with the following revised conditions:
1. The Landfill Dump Permit shall be valid only until January 1, 1973;
2. The earth cover requirements of Section 1601.030 of the Municipal
Code shall be complied with at all times during the life of the permit;
3. The finished site elevation shall not exceed 880 feet above sea level
or as directed by the Village Engineer;
4. No heavy earth moving equipment shall be allowed to utilize the right -
or -way of County Road "C" for the purposes of maneuvering or accomp-
lishing the fill operation;
5. The finished site shall be covered with a total depth of '18" of earth
soil material;
6. The only materials allowable for dumping shall be stumps, trees, limbs,
and wood chips. This shall not include construction demolition or
concrete materials;
7. No building permits for structures shall be requested or issued until
the applicant can demonstrate that this fill material has been com-
pacted to satisfactory standards acceptable to the Village Engineer.
8. The fill area authorized in this permit shall be for that area as
shown on the attached map;
9. The permittee shall be responsible at the end of each day for sweep-
ing or otherwise keeping clean that protion of County Road "C" which
is cluttered with dirt trackings resulting from droppings from trucks
exiting or entering the fill area;
10. No dumping or earth moving shall be allowed during Saturday and Sun-
day of each week. Dumping and operations or earth moving or heavy
equipment on the site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. to
6:00 P.M.;
11. The landfill dump permit shall be valid only until January 1, 1973;
- 4 - 8/3
However, it is understood that the applicant and the property owner must
continually meet all the above conditions. If the noise, dust, or other
nuisances associated with this dumping operation are found to be un-
objectionable by the residents whose property is adjacent or close to the
Stanke property, the permit may be extended one year;
12. The route of entrance for dumping must be via Highway 61;
13. A $1,000 performance bond shall be filed with the Village to ensure com-
pliance with the above conditions;
14. The applicant and the property owner must sign indicating they agree to
the above conditions.
15. All fill shall be covered daily.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan.
Motion carried.
Ayes - Councilwoman Olson, Council-
men Greavu, Haugan and
Wiegert.
Nays - Mayor Axdahl
f. Mayor Axdahl suggested that if further study indicates an ordinance of
some specific nature should be drawn in regard to disposal of diseased trees,
that ordinance should also affect this particular project. If it is indicated
to the Council that this particular site for the disposal of trees is a har-
boring vehicle for the disease and should not be encouraged for the Village;
he would like to see that as a vehicle for terminating a dump of that type.
2. Park Plan - Gethsemane Park /School
a. Manager Miller stated the Council had referred this matter back to the
Staff to review alternate methods of constructing facilities in this area.
The findings of the Staff review are that if the park is to be fully utilized,
there is no choice but to utilize the original plan.
b. Recreation Director Joyce presented the Staff report and the three alter -
nates;n detail.
c. Mr. Mark Harris, 833 Bartelmy Lane, representing the residents in the im-
mediate area, is concerned about the parking on the streets, and also the water
build up. He doesn't feel that the residents have been considered. The res-
idents would like further consideration if the original plan is accepted.
d. Mr. Bruce Warzalh, a resident and also area director for the Village, spoke
in favor of the original plan.
e. Mr. Jerry Proesch, baseball coach, spoke on behalf of the need for this
recreation facility.
f. Following further discussion, Councilman Greavu moved to transfer the
$4,000.00 saved by the new Insurance policies to the Recreation Department
for development of the Gethsemane Park Site by filline in the southwest cor-
ate
to
5. - 8/3
Seconded by Councilwoman Olson
Motion carried.
Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilwoman
Olson, Councilmen Greavu
and Wiegert.
Nays - Councilman Haugan.
Councilwoman Olson excused herself from the meeting at 9:25 P.M.
3. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - East of Arcade Street in the vicinity of
County Road B (72 -13)
a. Manager Miller stated it is recommended that Milner W. Carley and Assoc-
iates be retained as the project engineers for this installation. That com-
pany was utilized for the surveying portion and it is felt that it can more
efficiently design the project. Final plans will be ready for the project
and a bid opening date of August 23 is recommended. Property owners in the
area have been notified that this item will be on the agenda.
b. Village Engineer Collier explained in detail the proposed project.
c. Mayor Axdahl asked if any persons wished to speak regarding the proposed
improvement.
Dick Todd, recently purchased a home in the area, asked questions re-
garding costs and assessment procedures.
d. Councilman Greavu moved to authorize that Milner W. Carley and Associates
be retained as consultant Engineers for this project. (72 -13)
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert.
Ayes - all.
e. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
72 - 8 - 168
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the Village Council on June
22, 1972, plans and specifications for Arcade Street Sewer No. 72 -13, have
been prepared under the direction of the Village Engineer, and he has pre-
sented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto
and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file
in the office of the Village Clerk.
2. The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for
bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans
and specifications. The advertisement shall be published once, at
- 6 - 8/3
least ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the
work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and
considered by the Council at 10:00 A.M. on the 23rd day of August,
1972 at the Village Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless
sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check
or bid bond, payable to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota for 5%
of the amount of such bid.
3. The Village Clerk and Village Engineer are hereby authorized and
instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time
and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council
will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at a special meet-
ing of the Village Council on August 24, 1972.
4. The advertisement for bids shall be in substantially the follow-
ing form:
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
The Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will receive sealed bids
for the construction of approximately 1085 feet of sanitary sewer line, 500
feet of force main, 1200 feet of services, and lift station within the Vil-
lage limits on the basis of cash payment for the work. Bids will be received
until 10:00 A.M., C.D.S.T., on the 23rd day of August, 1972, at the Municipal
Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, at which time and place
all bids will be publicly opened, read aloud and considered.
Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement there-
on indicating proposal for bid contained within and addressed to the Village
of Maplewood, Minnesota. Proposals shall be submitted to the Village Clerk
on or before the above stated time. Proposal is for the furnishing of all
labor, equipment and materials and performing all work in connection with
the above stated construction.
Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file in the office of
Milner W. Carley and Associates, 500 West Highway 96, St. Paul, Minnesota,
55112.
Copies of the documents may be obtained by depositing Ten Dollars ($10)
with the Engineer. The amount of deposit for one set of documents *i ll,,be
refunded to each actual bidder who returns the plans and documents in good
condition within ten (10) days after the opening of bids.
All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable
to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota, in an amount equal to five percent
(5%) of the total bid, conditioned that if the bidder is the successful bid-
der he will enter into a contract in accordance with said bid and will fur-
nish such performance bonds as are specified. No bidder may withdraw his
bid for at least thrity (30) days after the scheduled closing time for the
receipt of bids, without the consent of the owner.
The owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive
any informalities in bidding.
- 7 - 8/3
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
4. Special Use Exception - 1175 E. Highway 36
a. Manager Miller stated the applicants are requesting a special exemption
from the M -1 (light manufacturing) zone for the buildings addressed as 1175
and 1195 East Highway 36 to allow for "general office and business use ".
There are two existing offices being operated out of the building at 1175
East Highway 36 at the present time. The applicant is operating one office
space for the purposes of showing and protecting the property. We agree
that this use is acceptable under zoning regulations for the purposes of
selling the property. The other office is not being operated for this pur-
pose and does require a special exception as does the use of the entire
buildings for the stated purposes. The building located at 1175 was con-
structed under a permit showing its use as "commercial ". This use was never
sanctioned by a special exception by the Village Council. The proposed land
use plan does envision such use of this property; however, the land use at
this time is still in the "proposed" stage and has not been finally adopted
by either the Planning Commission or the Council. The Council has determined
that special exceptions from M -1 zoning do come within the realm of the mor-
atorium established by the Council. In addition, the applicants are not
making a specific proposal, but rather wish a general approval of a general
usage. Such a general allowance is only given by a zone change and not a
special exception permit. The applicants wish to sell the property and are
not proposing a specific use for themselves. It is recommended that a de-
cision on the special exception request be held in abeyance until the ex-
piration of the moratorium, and that the applicants be informed that at that
time they should either present a specific request or consider requesting a
zone change.
b. Mr. Ray Faricy, attorney representing the applicant, spoke on behalf of
their request.
c. Mr. Proctor, Proctor Realty, also spoke on behalf of their request.
d. Councilman Wiegert moved that the occupancy permit be granted for
office use at 1175 E. Hiehwav 36 as it is a continuance of Drevious us
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
5. Property Division and Assessment Split
a. Manager Miller stated the major property owners in the area of the Homart
Development have agreed among themselves, as a result of a need to adjust
property lines in multiple areas around the perimeter of the Homart tract,
to combine all properties involved for ease of adjustment and then to reissue
and record a revised description. In this way they would eliminate the mul-
tiple fragment of property descriptions that would have resulted in their
first proposal. The Village Attorney's office has reviewed the situation and
has advised us that the State law which excludes platting of tracts of more
- 8 - 8/3
than five acres would effect this situation in the following manner: (1)
the resulting parcel owned by Homart would not be subject to our platting
code requirements due to the fact that its total lot size will exceed five
acres and (2) the Korstad parcel which would be accepted out of this trans-
fer will be less than five acres and will, therefore, be subject to our
platting code requirements. In November, of 1971, Korstad and Homart joint-
ly divided ownership and the frontage pattern which resulted in the need for
the splitting of assessments for the improvement of White Bear Avenue along
the frontage of the property. The redistribution of these assessments was
not possible until the Village had approved the platting of the Korstad
property. No such application was made and the assessments were not re-
distributed. Now to combine all properties Ramsey County desires the assess-
ments split figures so that the total 1971 taxes can be paid. It is recom-
mended that the assessments be computed and ordered distributed by the Council
in accordance with their distribution policies.
b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: (Division No. 044193)
72 -8- 169
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 68 -9 -177, 69 -9 -155, 70 -9 -130 and 63 -8 -149
of Maplewood, adopted 9/1/68, 9/9/69, 9/1/70 and 8/22/68 the special assess-
ments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White Bear
Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary
Sewer Improvement No. 6 -1 were levied against the attached list of described
properties; said list made a part herein;
WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conveyed and are de-
scribed according to the attached list, said list made a part herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINN-
ESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White Bear
Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary
Sewer Improvement No. 6 -1 against the heretofore mentioned properties be cor-
rectly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County in the amounts stated on the
attached list; said list made a part herein.
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
c. Manager Miller stated in the case of the proposed property div-
ision, it is recommended that a variance from Section 1008 of the Platting
Code be granted which waives the requirements of formal platting for the
Korstad property. Such a waiver should be subject to the following condit-
ions:
1. There shall be a written legal description of the parcel furnished
to the Village;
2. The parcel shall waive its claims to any curb cut vehicle access
points directly onto or off -of or within 200 -feet of White Bear
Avenue;
3. The Homart parcel shall provide a reciprocal easement agreement to
the Korstad parcel to and from White Bear Avenue, and further such
agreement shall be reviewed and approved as to form by the Village
Attorney;
- 9 - 8/3
4. The Korstad parcel shall provide a lot division fee of $20.00 in
accordance with Village requirements to defray expenses in adjust-
ing all its records and accounts relating to the properties;
5. Any further ownership division within property lines of the Korstad
parcel shall not be allowed or recognized by the Village ,except by
way of formal plat under the Village Code; and
6. Korstad and Homart shall agree in writing to the appropriate condit-
ions relating to the Korstad parcel and such written agreement shall
be filed with the Village.
7. Temporary easement be granted for Sanitary sewer construction.
d. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the request for variance of the Plat
ting Code subject to the following conditions:
1. There shall be a written legal description of the parcel furnished
to the Village;
2. The parcel shall waive its claims to any curb cut vehicle access
points directly onto or off -of or within 200 -feet of White Bear
Avenue;
3. The Homart parcel shall provide a reciprocal easement agreement to
the Korstad parcel to and from White Bear Avenue, and further such
agreement shall be reviewed and approved as to form by the Village
Attorney;
4. The Korstad parcel shall provide a lot division fee of $20.00 in
accordance with Village requirements to defray expenses in adjust-
ing all its records and accounts relating to the properties;
5. Any further ownership division within property lines of the Korstad
parcel shall not be allowed or recognized by the Village except by
way of formal plat under the Village Code; and
6. Korstad and Homart shall agree in writing to the appropriate condit-
ions relating to the Korstad parcel and such written agreement shall
be filed with the Village.
7. Temporary easement be granted for Sanitary sewer construction.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan.
Ayes - all.
e. Manager Miller stated as a result of the refiling of the new description
with Ramsey County it will be necessary to again officially split the White
Bear Avenue levied assessments based upon the new property descriptions. It
is recommended that the Village authorize the splitting of the outstanding
assessments in methods utilized by the Council for assessment splitting by
the proper Village Officials and that the Council approve such in order that
it may be so recorded for 1972 collection. It should be noted that Homart
will ultimately be required to plat its area. We have informed Homart that
such a platting will be required prior to occupancy of any building or portion
thereof in the center. This will allow Homart to finalize its sales arrange-
ments prior to platting. The staff has discussed these provisions with Mr.
May and they appear to be acceptable to Homart.
f. Councilman Haugan introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: (Property Division No. 044193)
72- 8- 170
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 68 -9 -177, 69 -9 -155, 70 -9 -130 and
- 10 - 8/3
63 -8 -149 of the Village Council of Maplewood, adopted 9/8/69, 9/9/69, 9/1/70
and 8/22/68, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer
Improvement No. 9, White Bear Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue
Improvement No. 69 -5 and Sanitary Sewer No. 6 -1 were levied against the attach-
ed list of described properties; said list made a part herein;
WHEREAS, the above mentioned properties have been conveyed and are de-
scribed according to the attached list, said list made a part herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 9, White
Bear Avenue Improvement 1969, White Bear Avenue Improvement No. 69 -5 and
Sanitary Sewer No. 6 -1 against the heretofore mentioned properties be correct-
ly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County in the amounts stated on the
attached list; said list made a part herein.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert.
Ayes - all.
g. Village Engineer Collier stated one additional property division is re-
quired as a result of the widening of Beam Avenue.
h. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: (Property Division No. 043980)
72 -8 -171
WHEREAS, property division numbered 043980 was received and duly in-
vestigated;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that assessments regarding said property divisions remain unchanged.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
6. Planned Unit Development - Maplewoods - Final Plat
a. Manager Miller stated the proposed final subdivision plat for the
Maplewoods area is in accordance with the preliminary plat. Final plat
approval is recommended subject to compliance with the preliminary plat
approval conditions, prior to the signing of the final plat.
b. At this time, Mr. Glass, 1855 Myrtle Street, stated he would like to
know about the property at 1806 McKnight Road, owned by Mr. and Mrs. Gill.
How did they acquire the 33 feet south of their property.
c. Mayor Axdahl stated Ripley Avenue from McKnight Road to Currie Street
was vacated.
d. Manager Miller stated Maple Woods, Inc, has donated 10 feet of their
property for walkway purposes.
e. Mayor Axdahl requested Staff to review the situation.
- 11 - 8/3
f. Manager Miller stated the Village has a right to investigate the 10
foot easement only.
g. Village Planner Seida stated there are two plats involved here, one for
the condominums.
h. Councilman Greavu moved approval of the final plat for Maplewood Hills
Inc. subject to compliance with conditions of the Preliminary Plat approva
and no signing of final plat until all conditions are complied with.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
i. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the final plat for the 72 unit
condominium subdivision.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
7. Kohlman's Addition - Final Plat
a. Manager Miller stated this final plat is in accordance with the approved
preliminary plat. A copy of the proposed escrow agreement is included. This
project is not serviced by a public water system. Included in the escrow
agreement is the installation of a "dry" watermain.
b. Councilman Haugan moved approval of the escrow agreement and the final
plat of Kohlman's Addition.
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
8. Community Design Review Board - Ordinance
a. Manager Miller stated at the meeting of July 20, Council placed on first
reading an ordinance which corrects the community design review board ord-
inance relative to final approval of building plans by the Council. The or-
iginal ordinance included contradictory sections relative to this question.
b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its
adoption;
ORDINANCE NO. 328
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND ITS
PROCESSES
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. 202.120 Community Design Review Board
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA does hereby establish a Community
Design Review Board in order to:
1. Encourage the orderly and harmonious growth of the Village.
- 12 - 8/3
2. Provide for the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property
within the Village.
3. Maintain the public health, safety and general welfare.
4. Maintain property and improvement values throughout the Village.
5. Encourage the physical development of the Village as intended by the "Plan
for Maplewood ".
Section 2. 202.130. Purpose of this Ordinance.
It is the purpose of this ordinance to:
1. Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a
method by which the Village may implement this interdependence to its benefit.
2. Encourage the development of private and public property in harmony with the
desired character of the Village and in comformance with the guidelines herein
provided with due regard to the public and private interests involved.
3. Foster attainment of those sections of the Villagers "Plan for Maplewood"
which specifically refer to the preservation and enhancement of the particular
character and unique assets of this Village and its harmonious development,
through encouraging private and public interests to assist in the implementation
process.
4. Assure that the public benefits derived from expenditure of public funds for
improvement and beautification of streets and other public structures and
spaces shall be protected by the excercise of reasonable controls over the
character and design of buildings and open spaces to include street landscaping,
median strips, parks, etc.
Community Design Review Board Duties and Responsibilities
The duties of the Community Design Review Board shall be:
1. To review,
2. To recommend approval to Village Council,
3. Cause to be modified, or
4. Recommend denial to Village Council of all proposed developments requiring
qualified aesthetic and architectural judgment to the end that the general
appearance of all proposed development shall preserve or enhance the physical
environment and character of the Village of Maplewood.
Section 3. 202.140 Membership
The Community Design Review Board shall consist of seven (7) members. One (1)
member shall be a Planning Commissioner appointed by the Planning Commission. No Com-
mission member shall serve for more than three (3) consecutive years. Six (6) members
shall be appointed by the Village Council. Initially, three (3) of the Council appointed
members shall serve a one (1) year term. Three (3) of the Council appointed members
- 13 - S/3
shall serve a two (2) year term. Council appointed members may serve no more than
two (2) consecutive terms. All subsequent appointments or reappointments shall be
for a two (2) year term only. The Community Design Review Board chairman shall be
chosen annually by the board.
Council appointed members shall be as follows:
1. Two (2) architects, if available to serve.
2. Two (2) members shall be from a related design or construction field, i.e.
landscape architects, interior designers, planners, civil engineers, contract-
ors, appraisers, realtcrsi,etc.
3. All of the above members shall, if applicable, be registered and licensed to
practice in the State of Minnesota.
4. Two (2) members of the Community Design Board shall be citizen laymen.
All members shall be able to read and interpret architectural drawings and to
judge the affects of a proposed building, structure or sign upon the surrounding com-
munity.
The Director of Community Development, or his designated representative shall
serve as secretary of the Board and shall have no voting status.
Section 4. 202.150 Staff Review
The Community Development Department Staff shall process and review all Community
Design Review Board applications and shall act as professional advisors to the Board.
Other staff members of the Village may provide advice to the Board depending upon the
complexity of the subject and the need for specific expertise.
Section 5. 202.160 Community Design Review Area
No action shall be taken on an application for the issuance of a building or sign
permit for any sign, building or structure in any zoning district in the Village except
R -1 for single family dwelling only and their accessory structures, without first re-
ceiving the approval of the Community Design Review Board. The Board shall also review
and approve, cause to be modified, or deny any matter referred to the Board by the Vil-
lage Council or the Planning Commission. The Board shall not review interior designs or
layouts of structures.
Section 6. 202.170 Meeting Procedure.
The Community Design Review Board shall hold regularly scheduled public meetings
as directed by the Board. An applicant, upon the filing of an application, shall be
advised of the date, time and place of his appearance before the Board.
Four (4) members of the board must be present to hold and conduct a formal meet-
ing. A majority vote of the members present is sufficient to take action on a submittal.
Section 7. 202.180 Required Application and Plan Submittal.
An applicant shall submit a Community Design Review Board application form and the
- 14 - 8/3
following materials, as applicable to the specific project, (in sufficient quantities
as determined by the Board) to the Community Design Review Board.
A. A design development plan of the entire project showing:
1. A dimensioned site plan
2. A roof plan of all buildings
3. The location of all existing trees and structures on the project site
4. The location and dimensions of all streets, alleys, and highways both
adjacent to and within the project site area
5. The location of all off - street parking and loading facilities and areas
6. The location of points of entry and exit for all vehicular and internal
circulation patterns
7. The location of all walls and fences
8. The location of all exterior lighting standards
9. The grading and slopes; where these affect the relationship of the build-
ings on the project site and surrounding building adjacent to the project
B. Dimensioned architectural drawings which show:
1. An entire plan drawn to scale
2. Elevations including all sides of the proposed project buildings and /or
structures, including materials and colors
3. Perspectives, model or other suitable graphic materials at the option of
the Board
C. Preliminary landscape plans, designating all areas to be landscaped with an
indication of both types of materials and their elevations
D. Site photographs at the option of the Board
Section 8. 202.190 Submittal Evaluation
The Community Design Review Board shall review the materials submitted with the
application with respect to the following aspects of the proposal:
1. General site utilization
2. General architectural considerations including a review of
a. The height, bulk and area of all buildings on the site
b. The colors and materials to be used
- 15 - 8/3
C, The physical and architectural relationship of the proposal with existing
and proposed structures in the area
d. The site, layout, orientation and location of all buildings and structures
and their relationship with open areas and the topography
e. Height, materials, colors and variations in boundary walls, fences or
screen plantings
f. Appropriateness of sign design and exterior lighting
3. General landscaping considerations
4. Graphics to be used
To grant approval of an application the Board shall make the following findings:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship
to neighboring or existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that
it will not impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neigh-
borhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment
of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create
traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with
the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the
harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this ordinance
and the "Plan for Maplewood ".
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a de-
sirable environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that
it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors.
The Board in its actions of approval may:
1. Attach any conditions that it deems reasonable to its action of approval.
2. Require the applicant, as a condition, to provide guarantees that the condit-
ions of approval will be complied with.
Section 9. 202.200 Time for Decision.
The Board shall decide and make recommendations to the Village Council on all
matters before them within twelve (12) work days after the date of filing of the re-
gpired application with the Department of Community Development, except when the ap-
plicant consents to an extension of time. If the Board fails to render its decision
within the period of twelve (12) working days or any extension thereof consented to
by the applicant, then the application shall be forwarded on the 13th day or on the
day after the extension ends, to the Village Council for final review and action.
Section 10. 202.210 Delegation of Authority
The Board may, at its discretion, authorize the Director of Community Development
- 16 - 8/3
to approve or cause to be modified sign applications or proposed additions or remodel -
ings not exceeding $1,000.00 in construction valuation.
Section 11. 202.220 Establishment of Special Community Design Areas.
The Board may, from time to time at its discretion, recommend to the Planning
Commission that certain special community design review areas and that specific criteria
to be considered in reviewing applications for development within said areas be establish-
ed. The Planning Commission shall review such recommendations and shall recommend ap-
proval, modification or denial of same to the Village Council. The Village Council shall
take the final action on all such recommendations and may designate said areas by res-
olution.
Section 12. 202.230 Appeal
A notice of appeal to the Village Council may be filed by any person aggrieved.,or
affected by a decision of the Community Design Review Board. The appeal to the Village
Council shall include the following:
1. The appeal shall be in writing and received by the Village Clerk within ten
(10) calendar days after the Community Design Board's decision is reached.
2. The appeal shall indicate and outline with justifications the reasons why an
appeal is requested and why such action taken by the Community Design Review
Board acts to create an undue hardship upon the appellant.
3. There shall be an appeal fee of $10.00 which is submitted at the time of filing
an appeal in writing to the Village Clerk
The Village Council may, on its own motion, also elect to consider any action taken
by the Community Design Review Board in the same manner as any appeal would be taken by
an aggrieved party. This would require the Village Council to follow the same outlying
steps of an appeal in writing within the time allotted and outlining the reasons for
the appeal.
The Village Council shall, at its next meeting following the filing of an appeal,
fix the time for hearing the appeal and give written notice thereof to the appellant
and the Community Design Review Board.
Section 13. 202.240 Enforcement
No final inspection or occupancy permit shall be granted unless the completed work
complies with the plans approved and the conditions required by the Community Design
Review Board.
Section 15. 202.250 Effective Date of Ordinance
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force after its passage, approval and
publication.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
9. Water Improvement - 11th Avenue (Supplementary Agreement)
a. Manager Miller stated during the construction of the Eleventh Avenue water -
main project it was necessary to remove some curb and gutter at a total cost
- 17 - 8/3
of $372.50. Approval of a supplementary agreement allowing for this work
is recommended.
b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
72 -8 -172
RESOLVED, by the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota that Supple-
mental Agreement No. 2 to the contract for construction of Eleventh Avenue
Water Project, 70 -16, in the amount of $372.50 be and hereby is in all things
approved.
FURTHER, that the Mayor and Clerk be and hereby are authorized and in-
structed to execute the said Supplemental Agreement for and on behalf of the
Village.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert.
Ayes - all.
10. Water Improvement - County Road B (Final Plans)
a. Manager Miller stated final plans have been prepared for the County Road
B water line between Day Road and Highway 61. Approval of the plans is re-
commended and a bid date of August 15 is suggested.
b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
72 -8 -173
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the Village Council on June
22, 1972, plans and specifications for County Road "B" Water, No. 72 -9, from
Day Road westerly, have been prepared under the direction of the Village Eng-
ineer, and he has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for
approval,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto
and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file
in the office of the Village Clerk.
2. The Village Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for
bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published once, at least
ten days before date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by
the Council at 10:00 A.M. on the 15th day of August, 1972 at the Village
Hall and that no bids shall be considered by the Council unless sealed
and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid
bond, payable to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 5% of the amount
of such bid.
- 18 - 8/3
3. The Village Clerk and Village Engineer are hereby authorized and
instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time
and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council
will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular
Village Council meeting of August 17, 1972.
4. The advertisement for bids shall be in substantially the following
form:
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
The Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota will receive sealed bids for
the construction of approximately 650 lineal feet of water main and appurten-
ances on County Road "B" from Day Road westerly, Project No. 72 -9.
Payment to the contractorshall be by check or cash.
Bids will be received until 10:00 A.M., C.D.S.T., on the 15th day of
August, 1972 at the Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minn-
esota at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened, read aloud
and considered. Award of contract will be based on the cost of this project.
Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with the statement thereon in-
dicating proposal for bid contained within and addressed to the Village of
Maplewood, Minnesota. Proposals shall be submitted to the Village Clerk on
or before the above stated time. Proposals for the furnishing of all labor,
equipment and materials and performing all work in conjunction with the above
stated construction must be submitted.
Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file in the Village
Offices, 1380 Frost Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. Copies of the doc-
uments may be obtained by depositing Ten Dollars ($10.00) with the Engineer.
The amount of deposit for one set of documents will be refunded to each bid-
der who returns the plans and documents in good condition within ten (10)
days after the opening of bids.
All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bid bond payable
to the Village of Maplewood, Minnesota in an amount equal to five percent
(5%) of the total bid conditioned that if the bidder is a successful bidder,
he will enter into a contract in accordance with said bid and will furnish
such performance bonds as are specified. No bidder may withdraw his bid for
at least thirty (30) days after the scheduled closing time for the receipt
of bids without the consent of the owner.
The owner reserves the right to reject or accept any or all bids and to
waive any informalities in bidding.
Mrs. Lucille Aurelius
Village Clerk, Village of Maplewood
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
I. NEW BUSINESS
1. Community Design Review Board (Building)
- 19 - 8/3
Councilman Haugan moved to waive the
Board to report to the Council, as tl
time as board members are appointed.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
a. Jasinski Liquor Store (2730 Stillwater Road)
Board until such
1. Manager Miller stated the building plan proposed is for an addition
to the Jasinski Liquor store at 2730 Stillwater Road. The addition pro-
posed is to the south of the existing building and is for the purpose
of storage of retail liquors. Approval of the plans is recommended
subject to conditions regarding (1) the removal of a truck, a sign and
pole structure and a temporary storage shed, (2) the paving of the parking
area, (3) the provision of enclosed waste removal facilities, (4) drive-
way locations, (5) removal of an underground petroleum tank and (6) the
striping of the off - street parking lot. Mr. Jasinski did pick up the
staff report on the afternoon of July 20. The Staff regularly makes it
a practice to notify people of the availability of staff reports involv-
ing them on the day of the release of the agenda. It should be the re-
sponsibility of the applicant to pick up the report and review it prior
to the meeting. If the staff report is made available prior to the meet-
ing, it is my feeling that any request for reconsideration based upon
the failure of an applicant to secure a copy of the staff report or to
comment on it is invalid and should not be considered.
2. Mr. Jansinski spoke on behalf of his request and also reviewed the
Staff report.
3. Village Planner Seida explained the reasons for the Staff recommend-
ations.
4. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the building plans of Jasinski
Liquor Store subject to the following conditions:
1. Removal from site of the van truck and contained storage therein on
the east side of existing building.
2. Removal of the sign and pole structure located at the southeast corner
of existing building.
3. Elimination and removal of temporary storage shed located at south
end of property.
4. Paving of area behind new addition to eliminate existing unpaved
but parking area.
5. Paving from existing parking lot on the west.up to building. No
parking allowed on west building side - such space is needed for traffic
aisle movement.
6. Building expansion shall provide container space enclosed for dump-
ster facilities for waste removal.
7. The driveway locations on the east side should be eliminated due to
traffic hazards.
- 20 - 8/3
8. The easterly driveway apron the north (along Stillwater Road) and
northerly driveway apron, on the east (along Century Avenue) should be
eliminated due to closeness to the hazardous intersection of Stillwater
Road and Century Avenue. The need for all curb cuts now existing is
unwarranted and present dangerous accident potentials on both abutting
streets to the liquor store.
9. The existing underground petrolium tank behind the existing build-
ing (to the south in the expansion area) shall be removed and filled in
thus eliminating future structure failure potential due to decomposition,
collapse, trapped fumes, etc.
10. The off- street parking lot shall be striped and spaces designated
in accordance with Municipal Code.
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
b. Twin City Tobacco and Candy Company (1065 E. Highway 36)
1. Manager Miller stated the Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company has
requested permission to construct a 3200 :'pquarefoot garage to the north
of their existing building. Approval of the building plans is recommend-
ed.
2. Councilman Greavu moved approval of the addition for the building
plans for the Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
3. A representative of Twin City Candy and Tobacco Company stated that
the garage will house the trucks at night.
C. Schroeder Milk Company
1. Manager Miller stated the Schroeder Milk Company wishes to build an
office addition above the existing building. Approval is recommended.
2. Councilman Haugan moved approval of the building plans of the Sch-
roeder Milk ComDanv to build an office addition above their existing
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
d. Kroger (1815 North St. Paul Road)
1. Manager Miller stated Gold Bond of Minnesota has requested authority
to remodel signs located on the property at 1815 North St. Paul Road.
Approval of the request is recommended.
2. Councilman Greavu moved to approve the request of Gold Bond of Minn-
esota to remodel signs located at 1815 North St. Paul Road.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
- 21 - 8/3
2. Tree Disposal Service - Proposal (Ecological Conservation Services)
a. Manager Miller stated Ecological Conservation Services, Inc., wishes to
make a proposal for the disposal and removal of diseased trees in Maplewood.
Staff has been informed by John Sauers, President of the organization, that
Ecological Conservation Services is a nonprofit organization involving min-
ority groups and the handicapped. Mr. Sauers wishes to make a presentation
to the Council relative to their services. Staff recommends that the letter
be accepted and filed.
b. Councilman Greavu moved to accept the
Services. Inc. and Dlace it on file.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
3. Street Vacation - Dorle Road (Petition)
a. Manager Miller stated staff has received a petition from fifty percent of
the property ownerships along Dorle Road (approximately 450 -feet south of
County Road D, extending approximately 225 -feet east of Hazelwood). A hear-
ing date of September 7 is recommended.
b. Councilman Wiegert moved to set a date of September 7, 1972 for the public
hearing on the vacation of Dorle Road.
Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all.
4. Property Division
a. Myra Kruger, 2671 Conway
1. Manager Miller stated Myra Kruger, 2671 Conway, has requested a lot
division of Lot 6, Block 7, Farrell addition. Approval of the lot div-
ision is recommended subject to the following conditions: (1) A survey
of all resulting parcels shall be provided, (2) All outstanding assess-
ments shall be paid, (3) The garage remaining on the parcel may not be
used as a dwelling, (4) The parcel with the house remaining shall have
two 6ffstreet parking spaces and the driveway provided in accordance with
the Village Code, and (5) Myra Kruger, as owner shall sign an agreement
acknowledging compliance with all conditions.
2. Councilman Wiegert
Mvra Kruger for DroDer
the lot di
roll
'S
1. A survey of all resulting parcels shall be provided
2. All outstanding assessments shall be paid
3. The garage remaining on the parcel may not be used as a dwell-
ing
4. The parcel with the house remaining shall have two offstreet
parking spaces and the driveway provided in accordance with
the Village Code
5. Myra Kruger, as owner, shall sign an agreement acknowledging
compliance with all conditions.
- 22 - 8/3
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
b. Libby
1. Manager Miller stated Keith, Jay and Dean Libby have requested that
an existing 8.23 acre parcel be divided into at least three parcels to
erect three single family dwellings. The Village Code requires formal
platting for such a subdivision and further provides that no building
permit shall be issued for single dwelling units on any property not
having frontage on a public street. The land in question is remote from
any public services and would not appear to be ready for development.
2. Dean Libby spoke on behalf of the request.
3. Following further discussion, Councilman Wiegert moved to deny the
request of the Libby's for a lot division.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilmen
Haugan and Wiegert.
Nays - Councilman Greavu.
Motion carried.
5. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - County Road B (Petition)
a. Manager Miller stated Staff received a petition for the construction of
sanitary sewer_ lines in County Road B from the Soo Line Railroad eastward for
a distance of 540 -feet. A feasibility report should be requested.
b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
72 - 8 - 174
WHEREAS, a certain petition has been received by the Village Council
for the improvement of the following described area:
County Road "B ", from the Soo Line Railroad eastward for a distance
of five hundred and forty feet (540').
by construction of sanitary sewer, service connections, appurtenances and
street reconstruction; and
WHEREAS, the said petition has been declared to be signed by the re-
quired percentage of owners of property affected thereby;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that the petition as hereinbefore described is hereby referred
to the Village Engineer, and he is instructed to report to the Council with
all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether
the proposed improvement is feasible and should best be made as proposed,
and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
- 23 - 8/3
6. Street Closing - Bicycle Ride
a. Manager Miller stated arrangements have been made with the City of St.
Paul to schedule a bicycle ride for Sunday, August 6 between the hours of
1:00 and 5:00 P.M. St. Paul will close Johnson Parkway from Phalen south
to Mounds Park and it is requested that the Village close Ripley Avenue be-
tween the entrance to Wakefield Park and East Shore Drive near Phalen Lake.
The route will again be signed and residents will still have normal access
to their properties. The closing of Ripley Avenue is recommended.
b. Councilman Haugan moved approval of the closing of Ripley Avenue for the
bicycle ride Sunday, August 6, 1972.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all.
7. Conciliation Court
a. Manager Miller presented a resolution which would establish a concili-
ation court utilizing our existing Municipal Court. The conciliation court
would not involve increased costs to the participating Villages. Citizens
of Maplewood are now required to go to St. Paul if they desire conciliation
court processes. It is felt that this service will be azValuable-one to the
citizens of our community.
b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
72 - 8 - 175
RESOLUTION CREATING A CONCILIATION COURT ADJUNCT TO THE PRESENT JOINT
MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE VILLAGES OF MAPLEWOOD, LITTLE CANADA, VADANIS
HEIGHTS AND GEM LAKE
WHEREAS, there is a need for a conciliation in the above stated Court,
and;
WHEREAS, the statutes of the State of Minnesota provide for the munic-
ipal creation of a Conciliation Court, M.S.A. 491.040, and;
WHEREAS, a Conciliation Court can function in and be of service to the
above stated participating Villages of the Joint Municipal Court at no in-
crease in costs to said Villages;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Conciliation Court is hereby
created pursuant to the above cited Minnesota Statute with no increase in
costs to the participating Villages of the said Joint Municipal Court effect-
ive October 1st, 1972.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
8. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Request for Gravity Sewer (Metropolitan Sewer
Board)
- 24 - 8/3
a. Manager Miller stated our preliminary sanitary sewer study suggested
that Maplewood encourage the MSB to proceed with the construction of a re-
placement interceptor for the "White Bear Interceptor" under gravity con-
ditions and to locate it along the right -of -way of TH 61 in the Village.
This will result in the elimination of many of the Village's lift stations
and in savings in future maintenance costs. It is recommended that the
resolution be adopted.
b. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:.
72 -8 -176
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Sewer Board was established to construct
and operate the interceptor sewers and wastewater treatment plants in the
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, including the "White Bear Interceptor" which
passes through the Village of Maplewood and which collects the wastewater
from a major portion of said Village, and
WHEREAS, said interceptor sewer was designed and constructed as a tem-
porary facility with a ten year anticipated life in 1963, resulting in the
current utilization of all available capacity, and
WHEREAS, the Village of Maplewood anticipates the opening of a shop-
ping center of metropolitan significance within its limits in 1974, which
will be tributary to the White Bear Interceptor and will create the need
for an additional allocation of capacity of major proportions, and
WHEREAS, the original design of said interceptor to operate under pres-
sure has necessitated the costly operation and maintenance by the Village
of pumping stations to discharge the Village's wastewater thereinto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Sewer Board is
requested to proceed immediately on the construction of a replacement inter-
ceptor for the inadequate, temporary facility now in operation, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Sewer Board is requested
to design said interceptor to operate under gravity conditions and to locate
this facility generally along the right -of -way of Trunk Highway 61 through
the Village of Maplewood, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Sewer Board be requested
to have its staff and consultants meet as soon as possible with represent-
atives of the Village of Maplewood to discuss this matter and to initiate
action on the project.
Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all.
9. Tavern License - Gladstone House
a. Manager Miller stated Mrs. Donna Funk, owner and operator of the Glad -
stone House has applied for a Liquor Display License (Set up). The necessary
investigation has been made and found to be in order. Approval is recommended.
- 25 - 8/3
b.
Councilman Wiegert
moved
approv
Set
up) for Mrs. Donna
Funk,
The
Gl
Seconded by Councilman Greavu.
J. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
Ayes - all.
1. Mayor Axdahl stated the Council previously discussed having an elected official
representing the area on the County Board's Highway Study Task Force. Councilman
Greavu volunteered.
2. Mayor Axdahl stated the Council also received a copy of a letter from the Penn -
igers on Ripley. They are having the same problem as the man who appeared here
tonight. Staff is to investigate.
R. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION
1. Manager Miller stated there had been a meeting Tuesday night with the County
regarding open space. The County requests Maplewood to establish a public hearing
on open space in the Battle Creek area. If a hearing date is set, when, where,
and who should be notified.
Council discussed procedures for the meeting and instructed Staff to notify
the residents 200 feet surrounding the area involved.
Councilman Greavu moved to set
School as the public hearing d
area.
Seconded by Councilman Wiegert.
L. ADJOURNMENT
11:46 P.M.
City Clerk
7:30 P.M. at Carver Element
Ayes - all.
- 26 - 8/3/702,
..Qe.,.:.y.�y:o1 �i:,.. -�.___ ., s... �..:: w..+.: cs�. � .- ..�r�•,:...c.�:2,4';+.:�ti�wu. J .........- .,,- ....�...........: t:w.�:si�.Lii1_ iyi..�....aw.��Y.;. _w. ✓_.._ uw .�...�..,.c�..,.n..ew..:..i..o. _�.'.L .._ •r . _.i_.....� ....i.L.....t -.:. urwa -.-.
185.41 AFU SERVICE
130.50 AIR COMM
240.00 AIR COMM
49561.38 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
20.00
ARTS TOWING
516.00
H & E
PATROL
339920.00
13ARBAROSSA
C SONS INC
468.38
BARTON
CONTRACTING CO
15.00
13EARS
AUTO CLINIC
19286.13
30ARD
OF WATER COMM
4.94
30ARD
OF WATER COMM
19177.08
BOARD
OF WATER COMM
11.64 BOBS OK HARDWARE
89000
CAPITOL SUPPLY CO
275.66
GEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO
834.80
J G CHISHOLM
10.11
COAST TO COAST STORES
157.60
COCA -COLA BOTTLING INC
44.79
COMM. LIGHTING PROD INC.
3.00
ROBIN A DEROCKER
7.00
EARTH WORKS
33.00
JAMES EMBERTSON
3.00
PATRICIA Y FERRAllO
14.00 GATEWAY GLASS CO
REPAIR &MAINT., VEHICLE
AND - REPAIR &MAINT., EQUIPMENT
REPAIR &MAINT., RADIO
REPAIR &MAINT., RADIO
BOND, INTEREST
AND -OTHER CHARGES
FEES FOR SERVICE
FEES FOR SERVICE
CONSTRUCTION FUND
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
REPAIREMAINT., VEHICLE
CONSTRUCTION FUND
UTILITIES
CONSTRUCTION FUND
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
AND - MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
REPAIR&MAINT., RADIO
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
FEES FOR SERVICE
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
REP. &MAINT., BUILDINGCGRND
'TRAVEL & TRAINING
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPORARY
TRAVEL .& TRAINING
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
1306
3.00
GENIE SALES & SERVICE
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
1307
360-12
GLADSTONE LUMBER MART
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
AND- MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
1308
12.60
GROSS INDUSTRIAL
SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL
1309
859.31
GULF OIL CORP
FUEL & OIL
1310
37.00
HOCHSTEIN CELLO BAG CO
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
1311
14.00
HOME GAS CO INC
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
1312
33.00
INFINITE GRAPHIC
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
1313
318.00
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES
RENTAL, EQUIPMENT
1314
200.00
INTL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIP
1315
2.28
JONATHAN STORES INC
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
.316
108.78
LARRYS AUTO GLASS CO
REPAIREMAINT., EQUIPMENT
AND- REPAIREMAINT., VEHICLE
,17
16.18
LEES AUTO SUPPLY
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
I MENT
318
19.29
LUGER MERCANTILE CO
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
319
20.00
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
320
289342.14
METROPOLITAN SEWER BOARD
RENTAL, SEWER
AND- CONTRACT PAYMENT
321
166.80
MIDWAY FORD CO
REPAIR&MAINT., VEHICLE
AND °SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
322
31.00
MIDWAY TRACTOR & EQUIP CO
REPAIR &MAINT., VEHICLE
323
102.75
MPLS CITY TREASURE
SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPCRARY
S24
100.00
3 M COMPANY M133864
EQUIPMENT, OTHER
125
200.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIP
126
3096.02
MINN HOSPITAL ASSOC
CONTRIBUTIONS, INSURANCE
AND- HOSPITALIZATION WIH
,27
203.69
MIRACLE EQUIPMENT CO
EQUIPMENT, OTHER
8
171770.00
ERWIN MONTOMERY CONSTR CO
i
CONSTRUCTION FUND
29
32.90
MOORE BUSINESS.FORMS INC
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
...,«�.......�. ...�.., ... ..,_. ..,_�. ,... `:: �: kw. r.._.. �.. i_... i..._...,...... a... �a`, b' iw-.. �. r....:.. �a.. �. �....-_.. wn-. ,.�i.»....._.......�..,�..�4s�r Y ^w.:.GRuc.a...ci.::.. ,..:.�.e:iuu..i ». ��......,.... ......: _..av �....��.»...�......+.....
137.85
737.00
35.40
2.00
8.25
149.40
4.36
6.85
5.35
4.50
15.00
29581.00
61.20
214.50
57.81
48.75
484.50
4, 500. 13
228.50
32.50
112.50
70.00
41.50
284.50
34.92
v.c=
MOTOTOLA C C E INC
EUGENE MURRAY
NEW ENGLAND BUSINESS SERV
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
NORTHWESTERN BELL TE CO
NORTHWESTERN BELL TE CO
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO INC
OXYGEN SERVICE CO INC .
REPAIREMAINT., RADIO
FEES FOR SERVICE
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
FUEL C OIL
PIONEER RIM C WHEEL CO
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
REED TIRE SALES INC
SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
EDWARD REINERT
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
RYAN- WENZEL INC
CONSTRUCTION FUND
S C T OFFICE PROD
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
JEANNE SCHADT
ELECTION EXPENSE
RICHARD W SCHALLER
TRAVEL 6 TRAINING
SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL
CHEMICALS
SEARS ROEBUCK S CO
BUILDING, IMPROVEMENT
SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC
EQUIPMENT, OTHER
SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC
ESCROW FUND
SMALL ENGINE REPAIR
REPAIR&MAINT., EQUIPMENT
ST PAUL PISTOL CLUB INC
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
ST PAUL E SUBURBAN BUS CO
FEES FOR SERVICE
SUPERAMERICA
FUEL S OIL
TEAM ELECTRONICS
SUPPLIES, PRCGRAM
AND- EQUIPMENT, OTHER
TRUCK UTILITIES 6 MFG CO
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
AND- REPAIREMAINT., VEHICLE
22.10
16. 15
66.0 5
35.00
35.00
3.00
10.50
344.00
47.03
253.11
141.23
125.00
11.66
56.00
60.00
42.00
49.00
14.00
46.25
105.00
43.00
56.00
154.35
63.00
349.53
TWENTIETH CENTURY PRINTING SUPPLIES,
OFFICE
TWIN CITY FILTER SERV INC
REP. &MAINT., BUILDING &GRND
UNITED MAILING CO
SUPPLIES,
PROGRAM
VALS BODY SHOP
REPAIR &MAINT.,
VEHICLE
WAHL & WAHL INC
SUPPLIES,
OFFICE
WASHINGTON CNTY TREASURER
FEES FOR
SERVICE
WEBER & TORSETH INC
SUPPLIES,
VEHICLE
AND- REPAIR &PAINT., VEHICLE
WESTERN AIRLINES
TRAVEL C TRAINING
WHEELER HARDWARE CO
REP. &PAINT., BUILDING£GRND
AND - EQUIPMENT, OTHER
WHITE BEAR DODGE INC
REPAIR &MAINT.
VEHICLE.
ICf.E 1
XEROX
SUPPLIES,
OFFICE
XEROX
SUPPLIES,
OFFICE
ZAYRE SHOPPERS CITY
SUPPLIES,
PROGRAM
THOMAS ARTH
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
JANE S BAILEY
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY I
TERRY BEEBE
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
LAWRENCE BOWMAN
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRAR Y �
JOSEPH BROWN
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY i
WILLIAM CONLEY
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
HOWARD CORTY
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
MARY DEAN
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY I
NICHOLAS DEROSE
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY I
SHERRI DOTEN
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY*
GARY EGAN
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
JOHN'ERICKSON
SALARIES &
WAGES,TEMPCRARY I
.,........ o...,__•_` �__�__.,._..'+........�_.�Sa;.. ._,_..._........ ,....::...<...___._ �_ �ow7:.,..,......----_.. i. �...._...,. t+,._ w. a�_._. �.....:. �_>........._..,.. a...,. s.... �....»,. a. �...,...: z:,__....._...... i� ..._._._...Y:- .- .s.a,ar�si.���
a.
B0
85.75
KATHLEEN FERRAllO
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
B1
149.10
MARTHA FISCHBACK
SALARIES
E
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
AND- TRAVEL
& TRAINING
B2
14.00
RALPH FLAUGHER
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
83
63.00
GERALD GOROCKI
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
84
65.00
CHARLES HELGATE
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
85
139.65
PATRICIA KRESCH
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
86
5.20
JACK HORNER
TRAVEL &
TRAINING
87
141.00
SHAWN JAHNKE
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
88
145.43
30NA6D KRAMLINGER
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
AND- TRAVEL
& TRAINING
89
218.95
JUDY KRUSKOPF
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMf'CRARY
AND-TRAVEL
& TRAINING
30
10.20
DAVID G LANGNESS
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
AND- TRAVEL
& TRAINING
91
95.00
ROBERT MALLARY
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
92
60.00
KATHY MAYAR
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
93
147.60
WILLIAM MERRIMAN
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
94
77.00
MICHAEL MONN
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
195
60.00
CHYRL MOORELAN
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
,96
60.00
CONNIE MOORE
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
i97
134.89
PAUL MUELLER
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
X98
94.60
DONNA NEELY
'SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
199
150.15
KATHLEEN 0 BRIEN
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
r00
131.25
KARL OELKER
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
01
241.15
JAMES ORKE
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
X02
147.53
ROBERT PATES
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
03
238.75
DIANE PETERSON
SALARIES
&
WAGES,TEMPCRARY
FWOD D ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE DATE
08-03-72
U N T
C L A I M A N T
P U R P
0 S
60.00
JAE RANSZHA
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPCRARY
56.00
LAWRENCE ROSS
SALARIES
E WAGES,TEMPCRARY
148.11
NANCY REUTER
SALARIES
& WAGES,TEMPCRARY
60.00
JOHN RICHARDSON
SALARIES
C WAGES,TEMPCRARY
122.94
DEBBIE KAY RICHART
SALARIES
C WAGES,TEMPCRARY
143.00
CYNTHIA ROTH
SALARIES
C WAGES,TEMPORARY
106.75
JOHN SCHARFFBILLIG
SALARIES
E WAGES,TEMPCRARY
162.80
CHARLES SAXTON
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPCRARY
AND -TRAVEL
E TRAINING
131.50
GABRIELLE SCOTT
SUPPLIES,
PROGRAM
99.75
DEAN SPEESE II
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPORARY
134.44
LEE STEINCAMP
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPCRARY
173.25
CHERI STRAND
SALARIES
E WAGES,TEMPCRARY
240.25
MARGARET WALZ
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPCRARY
AND -TRAVEL
C TRAINING
14.00
CALVIN WESBROOK
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPCRARY
84.00
CHARLES WIGER
SALARIES
S WAGES,TEMPCRARY
3.00
MRS ROBERT BADE
REFUNDS
3.00
SALLY A FOATE
REFUNDS
3.00
MRS BARBARA OLSON
REFUNDS
107.25 BANN SUPPLIES, OFFICE
169103.57 KIRKHAM MICHAEL FEES FOR CONSULTING
7.97 LABELLES SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
10.00 ROBERT W MOORE CO CONSTRUCTION FUND
6.00 PROGRESSIVE ARCHITECTURE SUBSCRLPTIONS C MEMBERSHIP
5.00 SNYDER BROTHERS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
29.68 STOUVALLS MOTOR HOTELS TRAVEL C TRAINING
:001282 THRU 001428
GRAND TOTAL
147 CHECKS TOTALING
174 CHECKS TOTALING
128,429.97
609,268.38
„gvs66_a...� .v...... _.�,�a. �+ ._ i.e.. ..y �... _a air.. Ir. .. �... ..-... �- .i..., .. .... �. .. ,. ..vN .� ..,.e... r.. ... _�1fCla a..... �....�' .a.-.. ..�.> .+...- d•Ya.J .._�/ �._...w ..._. ... r.. v..sr _.., �.✓.L[WrW�r tuu+ -.
/ I
a #
A M U U N 7
L A t M A 11 1
v
+2
100.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOOKS & PERIODICALS
+3
10.00
FIRE ENGINEERING
BOOKS & PERIODICALS
+4
160.92
GEM
SUPPLIES, OFFICE
AND- SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
'5
30.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
FEES FOR SERVICE
46
21.50
RADISSON RESERVATION SERV
TRAVEL & TRAINLNG
(t7
11141.75
TABULATING SERV BUREAU
FEES FOR SERVICE
AND - RENTAL, EQUIPMENT
48
200.00
NORTH ST PAUL CHILDRENS
FEES FOR SERVICE
49
49416.30
FIRST STATE BANK OF ST
FEDERAL TAX W/H
50
11809.80
MINN COMM OF TAXATION
STATE TAX W/H
51
11105.50
CITY & CTY CREDIT UNION
CREDIT UNION W/H
52
66,00
JANE S BAILEY
SALARIES & WAGES,TEMPrRARY
53
105.00
COW -TOWN
FEES FOR SERVICE
54
10.00
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIP
55
91901.00
R A LUXENBURG CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION FUND
56
23.61
UNITED STATES LEASING CORP
RENTAL, EQUIPMENT
57
21083.50
LAIS & BANNINGAN
FEES FOR SERVICE
58
11914.59
LAIS & BANNINGAN
FEES FOR SERVICE
AND- CONSTRUCTION FUND
X59
11601.62
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CONTRIBUTIONS, RETIREMENT
AND- P.E.R.A. W/H
,60
21895.02
STATE OF MINNESOTA
-CONTRIBUTIONS, RETIREMENT
AND- P.E.R.A. W/H
161
2.25
INSTY PRINTS
SUPPLIES, PROGRAM
)62
75.00
GOODRICH GOLF COURSE
FEES FOR SERVICE
63
54.00
SPRING LK PARK REC CENTER
FEES FOR SERVICE
54
46.22
LUCILLE AURELIUS
POSTAGE
AND - PRISONER CARE
15665
15666
15667
15668
4451406.25 FIRST STATE BANK OF STP
4,665.25 FIRST STATE BANK OF STP
11887.83 MINN COMM OF TAXATION
11105.50 CITY E CTY CREDIT UNION
PURCHASE OF INVESTMENTS
FEDERAL TAX W/H
STATE TAX W/H
CREDIT UNION W/H
NECESSARY DIRECT EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING
SUB -TOTAL 27 CHECKS TOTALING 4809838.41
I ,11
i
PAYROLL
AUGUST 3. 1972
ITEM NO.
CHECK NO.
CLAIMANT
AMOUNT
1.
4801
Robin A. DeRocker
$ 308.18
2.
4802
Vivian R. Lewis
207.49
3.
4803
Michael G. Miller
569.19
4.
4804
Donald W. Ashworth
364.88
5.
4805
Lucille E. Aurelius
273.35
6.
4806
Phyllis C. Green
197.36
7.
4807
Arline J. Hagen
171.12
8.
4808
Alfred J. Peloquin
227.59
9•
4809
Betty D. Se.lvog
211.16
10.
4810
Lydia'A. Smail
158.00
11.
4811
Rita C. Smith
158.38
12.
4812
David L. Arnold
320.34
13.
4813
John H. Atchison
308.74
14.
4814
Ronald D. Becker
267.54
15.
4815
Anthony G. Catianes
379.47
16.
4816
Dale K. Clauson
286.77
17.
4817
Kenneth V. Collins
342.88
18.
4818
Dennis S. Cusick
347.88
19.
4819
Dennis J. Delmont
308.75
f X20.
4820
Richard C. Dreger
316.25
x'121.
4821
Raymond E. Fernow
278.43
22.
4822
Patricia Y. Ferrazzo
223.15
23.
4823
David M.Graf
307.56
24.
4824
Niorman ,L:•. Green
322.88
25.
4825
Thomas L. Hagen
406.79
26.
4826
Kevin R. Halweg
229.13
27.
4827
Michael J. Herbert
264.81
28.
4828
James T. Horton
293.37
29.
4829
Donald V. Kortus
199.49
30.
4830
Richard J. Lang
279.80
31.
4831
Roger W. Lee
301.97
32.
4832
John J. McNulty
319.05
33.
4833
John A. Melander
294.15
34.
4834
Richard M. Moeschter
294.67
35.
4835
Robert D. Nelson
333.85
36.
4836
William F. Peltier
240.80
37.
4837
Dale E. Razskazoff
247.21
38.
4838
Richard W. Schaller
446.41
39.
4839
Robert E. Vorwerk
277.29
40.
4840
Duane J. Williams
292.25
41.
4841
Joel A. White
57.81
42.
4.842
Joseph A. Zappa
418.41
43.
4843
Donald W. Skalman
280.34
44.
4844
Gregory L. Stafne
276.46
45.
4845
Maureen A. DeGroot
148.90
046.
4846
Pamela J. Schneider
154.70
8/3/72
.yy
lt.o}bI� ..^.: iiitu3. 4r... ':..._u.a,�e......u._.�a.....,. .l_. � . .:: ' -:�' . • : '.. :. 1't ... .. ....'.. . �''. s .x.. .�. � _. •.�+.5[.», .. _ _
__ - •_. �sJ�...... �_ �: SfS:.. ..s.s_- w>��++S:ura�s...tsa..u.. �a a.�.. ...�._�.1wLd.Y.o.. a..i. ....... :.L�:.� ._... n' t. aW. 6... w....._. a��. �v.. ��. �a- C.•'.... r: ��r•.�l.rt:i�.:.��:_'a..n_.f�.t _�'_u....�........._r•.�+�.a. - ...r.._
ITEM NO.
CHECK NO.
CLAIMANT
AMOUNT 1
42'..
4847
Marcella M. Mottaz
$ 177.43
48.
4848
Alfred C. Schadt
360.74
49.
4849
Frank J. Sailer
137.38
50.
4850
Bobby D. Collier
550.88
51.
4851
William C. Cass
346.96
52.
4852
James G. Elias
217.51
53.
4853
Raymond J. Hite, JR.
442.22
54.
4854
Dennis L. Peck
218.97
55.
4855
Janet A. Rois
173.74
56.
4856
Patrick Jones, Jr.
175.14
57.
4857
Bernard A. Kaeder
326.49
58.
4858
Raymond J. Kaeder
274.78
59.
4859
Henry F. Klzt.sing
257.30
60.
4860
Gerald W.Meyer
251.79
61.
4861
Joseph W. Parnell
271.57
62.
4862
Arnold H. Pfarr
280.00
63.
4863
Joseph B. Prettner
381.69
64.
4864
Edward A. Reinert
287.83
65.
4865
Greg J. Bailey
179.18
66.
4866
Anthony T. Barilla,Jr.
143.48
67.
4867
Myles R. Burte
252.03
68.
4868
Herbert R. Pi.rrung
405.88
0 69.
4869
Stanley E. Weeks
237.95
70.
4870
David Germain
248.81
71.
4871
Timothy J. Finberg
149.95
72.
4872
Kevin B. McNulty
216.19
73.
4873
Lawrence B. Mike
181.60
74.
4874
Henry C. Pfarr
165.02
75.
4875
Stephen J. Prettner
148.21
76.
4876
Frank R. Kirsebom
324.34
77.
4877
Anthony T. Barilla
268.29
78.
4878
Richard J. Bartholomew
260.99
79.
4879
LaVerne S. Nuteson
240.80
80.
4880
Gerald C. Owen
283.25
81.
4881
Walton S. Madland
158.22
82.
4882
Thomas C. Rowan
160.98
83.
4883
JoAnn C. Christensen
181.05
84.
4884
John P. Joyce'
334.01
85.
4885
Eric J. Blank
282.72
86.
4886
Bailey A. Seida
411.48
87.
4887
Judy M. Chlebeck
181.99
88.
4888
Lester G. Axdahl
163.18
89.
4889
John C. Greavu
132.49
90.
4890
Harald L. Haugan
124.69
91.
4891
Patricia L. Olson
124.69
92.
4892
Donald J. Wiegert
124.69
93.
4893
Clifford J. Mottaz
227.98
Check No.
4801 through Check No. 4893
TOTAL
$24,367.56