Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-03-1972AGENDA Maplewood Village Council 7 :30 P.M., Thursday, February 3, 1972 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 72 - 4 (A) CALIF TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 72 -2 (January 13) 2. Minutes No. 72 -3 (January 20) (D) PUBLIC HEARINGS !� 1. Street Base Improvement - Beam Avenue (Hazelwood to Northern Pacific Railroad tracks) (7:45) 2. Special Use Permit (Excavation) - North of Beam Avenue and west T.H.61 (8:00) 3. Variances (Board of Adjustments and Appeals): a. Parking requirements - Zayre's Shoppers City (8:15) b. Setback requirement - Southwest corner of Edgerton and Skillman (8:30) 4. Zone Change (BC to SC) - Zayre's Shoppers City (continued from December 2,1971) 5. Special Use Permit (Excavation) - East of Kennard and approximately 700 -feet south of Beam (continued from January 20) 6. Special Use Permit (Public Utility Facility) - South of County Road D and west of Hazelwood Street (continued from January 20) 7. Deferred Assessment - Kennard Street (continued from January 13 ) - --- --�___ E) AWARDING OF BIDS - None (F) APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS (G) VISITOR PRESENTATIONS (H) UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Planned Unit Development - Southwest corner Lakewood Drive and Stillwater Road (Inland Construction Co.) 2. Sanitary Sewer Improvement Larpenteur, Myrtle to Hoi Street metering station (feasibility report) 3. Recreation Development Costs 4. Subdivision (Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 7) Chan(. order 5. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement (No.71 -3) - Fina: payment 6.. State Electrical Code - Ordinance No. 306 (second rea ing) 7. Dog License Fee - Ordinance No. 307 (second reading) (I) NEW BUSINESS 1. Voter Registration 2. Building Plan Review (Service Station) - Southwest co: Cope and White Bear Avenues 3. Snowmobile Regulations - Request for review 4. De- annexation Request 5. Gas Rate Study Group - Joint powers agreement 6. Proposed Ordinances: a. Dumping b. Sewer charge (large users) C. Snowmobile (Adoption of State provisions) 7. Lot Divisions 8. Hearing Dates: a. Zone Change Request (R -1 to R -2) B. Beam Avenue Improvement (Pond) (J) COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS (K) ADIiINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIOTS (L) ADJOURNMENT ADDENDUM TO THE AGENDA Meeting 72 - 4 I T E M D -1 It is the purpose of this project to utilize materials from the ponding area excavation which will not be available at a later date. The estimated cost of the project as completed at this time is $166,320. as compared to a potential future cost (after the ponding area fill is not available) of $248,930 or a potential savings of $82,610.00. D -2* The historical background of this request is included in the Community Development staff report of January 12. It is recommended that the proposal be denied in that the applicant be required to meet the slopes as provided in the previous permit. It is not felt that the future excavation of this area will enhance the development possibilities of the area, and it may seriously hamper future read construction through the area. The Planning Commission recommends denial of the request without prejudice. D -3a* The staff recommends denial of the variance request due to what we feel is a critical parking need around this facility. The variance, if granted, would provide for a maximum variance of 162 spaces. If variances are to be granted the following guide lines are suggested: 1) The variance for the Christmas tree sale still be denied due to maximum building sales demand for off - street parking; 2) Tent and garden sales variances be restricted to times indicated on the applicants request and for the specific purposes indicated; 3) The tent sales area be moved twenty feet south to the south property line to facilitate better traffic - circulation and minimize the number of parking spaces affected; 4) The signing and circulation system be approved by the Village Engineer and Police Chief; 5) All signs advertising the outdoor facilities require Village permit and must be kept in good repair and moved within two days upon termination of the dates outlined by the applicant; 6) The east side of Van Dyke Street be posted for no parking and that other periphery areas be evaluated for possible no parking designations; 7) The applicant sign a statement agreeing to the conditions imposed by the Village Council. D -3b* The applicants request that they be allowed to vary from the 30 -foot minimum requirement setback to be used to erect four above ground propane storage tanks surrounded by a six -foot woven board fence to be located a distance of 15 -feet from the street property line. It is recommended that the variance be denied, and that the applicant be required to show alternates that can be provided for interruptible standby service to serve the site. The recommendation of denial is based upon the fact that there is no hardship demonstrated, an alternate standby system is available, the area is developed to its maximum lot coverage, the visual amenities are adversely affected, there is an increased explosive hazard in a high density area, and a variance would constitute a special priviledge to this site which is currently denied all other multiple family residential areas in the neighborhood. D -4 ** This proposed zone change was heard on December 2, 1911, and the Council delayed decision until such time as the variance request for the property was heard. Denial of the zone change was recommended at that time. D -5 ** The Council heard this proposal at the January 20 meeting and tabled it until the applicant could provide more information to the Village Engineer. This information has now been sub- mitted to our satisfaction. The proposed excavation will involve approximately 200 truckloads and will bring the land _ into conformance with surrounding elevations. Approval is recommended with conditions relative to hours of operation, types of equipment etc. D -5* Enclosed is a letter from NSP stating that they have met with various officials relative to the drainage and highway construction in the area of their proposed substation site. I am informed by the Village Engineer that the plans for the highway interchange was not, in fact, the same as those presented to the Village Council. We will still reco.^imend the setback as provided in the original recommendation of the staff. The drainage can be handled, but we feel it is a misstatement to say that it will not result in "additional problems ". In fact the proposed use will probably result in less drainage problems and higher uses which might be placed on the area. At the request of the County Commission the Metropolitan Council is considering this proposal today and will be providing a recommendation on the proposal. ; -7e should have this recommendation by the time of the meeting. D -7* This deferred assessment was carried over from the January 13 meeting. Herbert H. Schouveller requests that his sewer assessment be cancelled due to the fact that he was unable to collect a bill resulting from damages he feels a contractor employed by the Village made on his property. It is recommend- ed that this deferment be continued, but not for the reason stated by the applicant. It is felt that changes in the sewer in that area in the near future may effect this case. At that time the assessment can be reviewed again in light of new developments. H -1* Enclosed is a letter from the Inland Construction Corporation outlining its position concerning the original conditions recommended by the Planning Commission on march 15, 1971. It is stated that they have made certain modifications in their site plan which include reducing the over -ail number of units, substituted outdoor swimming pools in court areas for indoor -2- swimming pools and have modified the exterior treatment of the buildings. Two basic questions remain unanswered in this project - - the treatment of the highway right -of -way and the recreation development cost provision of the conditions. The recreation policy will be discussed at a "shirt- sleeve" session tonight (Tuesday). The legal aspects of the highway right -of -way are now under study by the staff. H -2* The feasibility of replacing the sanitary sewer in Larpenteur Avenue between Myrtle Street and the Howard Street metering station has been reviewed and a report determining the project feasible is enclosed. The report is based on the Holloway relief sewer being constructed and the Larpenteur Avenue sewer receiving no flow from Holloway. The original sewer and lift station were installed in 1958 based on low density single family land use. The present and proposed land use now indicates a much higher density. It is proposed that the pro- ject be assessed on an area basis for thirty per cent`Qf the cost of the new main. The thirty per cent represents that portion of the reasonably expected life of the existing sewer which has been enjoyed by the property owners. The Village would pick up the rest of the cost. It is also proposed that the assessments be based on land use density. The total estimated cost of the project is $56,640. of which $16,992. would be assessed and $39,648. would be assumed by the Village. The average cost per assessable acre would be $57.00. A hearing date of March 2, 1972 is recommended. H -3 ** This item will be discussed at the "shirt- sleeve" session. The question arises both in the Inland Construction Company and Sagstetter planned unit developments. H -4 This is change order number two for this subdivision. The change order adds a unit for 18 -inch concrete pipe at $9.96 per foot to correct an omission in the original design. H -5 This is the authorization of final payment for the sanitary sewer and water main in Tilsen's -Maplewood Heights No. 7 to the Houle Sewer and Trenching Inc. in the amount of $24,477.06. It is requested that $1,000. be withheld pending review in the spring. H -6 ** This ordinance will go into effect on M=arch 1,1972. Final passage is recommended. H -7 Final adoption is recommended. I -1* This item was placed on the agenda at the request of Michael T. Wasiluk. Mr. Wasiluk. claims "harassment" of seventeen and eighteen year olds in the registration process. Enclosed is a complete report of the matter. -3- I -2* Building plans have been presented for the erection of a service station at the southwest corner of Cope and 07hite Bear Avenues. The proposal meets all of the Village codes. Approval is recommended with conditions. I -3 This item was replaced on the agenda at the request of a citizen. He was informed that he should present proposals to the Council in writing if he wished some action. A written proposal has not been submitted to me at the time of this writing. I -4* Property owned by James D. Swan on North Lake Boulevard is located partially in Maplewood and partially in North St. Paul. He has requested that the portion in `Maplewood be detached from Maplewood and annexed by North St. Paul. This was discussed previously by the Council and was referred to the Village of North St. Paul for the preliminary action. The Village of North St. Paul has now taken action to annex the property upon detachment from Maplewood. The detachment is recommended. I -_5* I have been meeting with the managers of other communities in the area and NSP in an effort to work towards the possibility of deformulation of a gas rate authority in NSP's Minnesota service area. It is recommended that the Village of Maplewood enter into a Joint agreement to prepare a gas rate authority through a joint powers agreement. The first step will be the entering into an agreement with the communities of White Bear Lake, New Brighton, North St. Paul, Roseville, Stillwater, South St. Paul, Winona and St. Cloud in establishing a study group. The study group will prepare a proposed gas rate authority joint powers agreement for all municipalities serviced with natural gas by NSP. The cost for the preparation of this agreement will be defrayed by NSP in an amount up to $1,000.. Approval is recommended. In addition I would ask that you appoint me as your repre- sentative to this study group. I -6a* The proposed ordinance would make the issuance of dumping permits of administrative function under the Department of Public Works. I -6b The proposed ordinance will establish sewer charges based on water usage for larger customers (over 2 -inch meters). I -6c* This ordinance will bring us into line with State Statute. It does not affect the main provisions of our ordinance, but will allow us to collect fines on violations. I -7 Routine I -8a This zone change is located between Duluth and Frank Streets. A hearing date should be set. I -8b This hearing will be for an amendment to the Beam Avenue improvement project. This is for the pending area and is required if bonds are to be issued. -4- MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD VILLAGE COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, February 3, 1972 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 72 - 4 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and was called to order at 7::32 P.M. by Mayor Axdahl. B. ROLL CALL Lester G. Axdahl, Mayor Present John C. Greavu, Councilman Present Harald L. Haugan, Councilman Present Patricia L. Olson, Councilwoman Present Donald J. Wiegert, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes No. 72 -2 (January 13, 1972) Councilman Greavu moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -2 (January 13 1972) be approved as corrected: Page 1: add "to study rates of Refuse Haulers" insert names of entire slate of Committee members. Page 18: Item C -2, j2 - insert "Whereas, this assessment was adopted by error, and" Seconded by Councilman Haugan 2. Minutes No. 72 -3 (January 20, 1972) Ayes - Councilwoman Olson, Councilmen Greavu, Haugan and Wiegert. Mayor Axdahl abstained, as he was not present at the meeting. Councilman Wiegert moved that Minutes of Meeting No. 72 -3 (January 20 1972) be approved as corrected: Page 3: item D, 1 -i - add "since recommendation No. 3 (on revised list) de- lineates the condition prior to the Building Plan approval'. Page 5: item D, lm -8 - "All apartment structures shall be lesser in height, as measured from ground level to roof peak line, than existing apart- ments in area (Edgerton Highlands)." Page 6: item D, 2 -h - add "a portion of which right of way may cross the right of way of the alley being discussed ". Page 9: item D, 5 -e - add "Although heard at this time not all spoke in op- position to the proposed development ". - 1 - 2/3 Page 13: item H, 4b - add paragraph c to paragraph b "This design was devel- oped by Ramsey County and not something the Village had developed" and renumber following items. Paragraph d: add "as shown in paragraph b above." Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. D PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Street Base Improvement - Beam Avenue (Hazelwood to Burlington Northern Rail- road Tracks) 7:45 P.M. 2, a. Mayor Axdahl convened the meeting for a public hearing on the Street Base Improvement of Beam Avenue from Hazelwood Street to the Burlington Northern Railroad Tracks. Manager Miller read the notice of hearing along with the dates of publication. b. Manager Miller stated it is the purpose of this project to utilize materials from the pending area excavation which will not be available at a later date. The estimated cost of the project as completed at this time is $166,320, as compared to a potential future cost (after the ponding area fill is not available) of $248,930.00, or a potential savings of $82,610.00. c. Village Engineer Collier presented a preliminary engineering report regarding the improvement. The fill would be used on the portion of Beam from Hazelwood Street to the railroad tracks. d. Mr. Beckman of Howard, Needle, Tammen and Bergendoff, presented draw- ings and specifics of the project. He stated this was a very preliminary plan because there are many unanswered questions such as traffic and the interchange at Hazelwood. e. Mayor Axdahl asked if anyone wished to speak in favor of the proposed improvement. No one was heard. f. Mayor Axdahl asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition. No one was heard. g. Mayor Axdahl called for formal objections. None were heard. h. Mayor Axdahl closed the public hearing, i. Councilman Haugan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (approving the project) 72 - 2 - 24 WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of roadway base on Beam Avenue from Hazelwood Street to the Burlington Northern Railroad a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on January 20, 1972, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; - 2 - 2/3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient, and necessary that the Village of Maplewood construct roadway base on Beam Avenue from Hazelwood Street to the Burlington Northern Railroad as described in the notice of hearing thereon, and orders the same to be made. 2. Village Engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 3. This improvement is hereby designated as Village Project 71 -15. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 2. Special Use Permit (Excavation) - North of Beam Avenue and West of T.H. 61 (8:00 P.M.) a. Mayor Axdahl convened the meeting for a public hearing on the appli- cation for a Special Use Permit for commercial excavating north of Beam Avenue and West of T.H. 61. Manager Miller read the notice of hearing along with the dates of publication. b. Manager Miller stated the historical background of this request was included in the Community Development staff report of January 12. It is recommended that the proposal be denied in that the applicant was required to meet the slopes as provided in the previous permit. It is not felt that the future excavation of this area will enhance the development pos- sibilities of the area, and it may seriously hamper future road construction through the area. The Planning Commission recommends denial of the request without prejudice. c. A video tape was shown, taken through the courtesy of the Minnesota Highway Patrol. Lee Stokes was pilot of the helicopter and Sgt. John McNulty was photographer and narrator, The video tape showed the entire excavation area as well as the sharpness of the slopes and the deep pits left from previous excavating. d. Chairman Lyman Coombs read the following Planning Commission report: "Commissioner Barrett moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the Village Council that: 1. This excavation permit be denied without prejudice; 2. It be suggested to the developer that consideration for excavation permits for this area could be given based upon the following criteria: a) That the excavation would be confined to the resloping of the current excavated area while developing a 3:1 minimum slope as re- quired by original permit. b) That a land use and development plan be submitted showing how this property is proposed to be resloped. - 3 - 213 c) That the excavation beyond this resloping would be based on the Village land use plan and the land use and development plan submitted by the developer. Commissioner Mogren seconded. Motion carried -- Ayes all." e. Mayor Axdahl called for proponents. The applicant, Mike Finneman, of Finneman Enterprises spoke on behalf of the proposed project. f. Mayor Axdahl called for persons who wished to speak in opposition. The following were heard: Bud Fitzgerald, 1210 Payne Avenue wished to know to what level they would excavate. Richard Barrett, 1176 E. County Road D stated that the excavation was dangerous and shows a lack of responsibility and is also a noise problem. Mr. Talmadge Carey, 1174 E. County Road D stated he lives just north of the area and is opposed. Denton Vars, Beam Avenue, complained of the silt and is opposed to the manner in which the excavation is being handled. Russell Mandell, 1190 Beam Avenue, showed photos taken last summer, of the silt. Harvey Zuercher stated he is not in opposition, but explained he has a pit in the area and obtained a permit back in 1960. He has no intent- ion of removing any more fill. g. Mayor Axdahl called for formal objectors. The following were heard: Richard Barrett, 1176 E. County Road D Talmadge Carey, 1174 E. County Road D Denton Vars, Beam Avenue Russell Mandell, 1190 Beam Avenue h. Mayor Axdahl closed the public hearing. i. Councilwoman Olson moved to table the Spe until the meeting of February 17, 1972 and to 'Shirt Sleeve' session. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. The 'Shirt Sleeve' session to be held on Thursday, February 10, 1972. Mayor Axdahl adjourned the meeting at 8:40 P.M. to meet as the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Mayor Axdahl reconvened the meeting at 9:20 P.M. - 4 - 2/3 4. Zone Change (BC to SC) - Zayre's Shoppers City (continued from December 2, 1971) a. Manager Miller stated that this proposed zone change was heard on December 2, 1971, and decision delayed until such time as the variance request for the property was heard. Denial of the zone change is re- commended. b. Councilman Greavu moved that the zone change request from Zayre's Shop- pers City from BC to SC be denied. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 5. Special Use Permit (Excavation) - East of Kennard and Approximately 700 feet South of Beam Avenue (continued from January 20, 1972) a. Manager Miller stated the Council heard this proposal at the January 20th meeting and tabled it until the applicant could provide more infor- mation to the Village Engineer. This information has now been submitted to our satisfaction. The proposed excavation will involve approximately 200 truckloads and will bring the land into conformance with surrounding elevations. Approval is recommended with the following conditions: 1. Subject to reapproval by the Village Council at the end of one year. 2. A performance bond of $5,000.00 to guarantee the excavation elevation as proposed and for -P road maintenance. 3. Subject to conditions deemed necessary by the Village Engineer, which would:i_include hours of operation. 4. No one authorized to conduct excavation on the site, except the ap- plicant. 5. No transfer of title of all or part of the special use permit site during the life of the permit unless reviewed and approved by the Council. 6. The Applicant sign an agreement, agreeing to the above conditions. b. Councilman Greavu moved approval of the Special Use Permit subject to staff conditions. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. c. Councilwoman Olson moved to suspend the Rules of Procedure to hear the applicants response to the conditions. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. d. The applicant, Mr. Joseph Dotte, was asked if felt the condition, re- garding the Village Engineer, was objectionable. The applicant stated it wasn't objectionable. - 5 - 2/3 e. Councilman Greavu restated his motion to read:-Approval of the re- quest of Mr. Joseph Dotte for a Special Use Permit for excavating pur- poses subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to reapproval by the Village Council at the end: of one year. 2. A performance bond of $5,000.00 to guarantee the excavation elevation as proposed and for .road maintenance. 3. Subject to conditions deemed necessary by the Village Engineer, which would include hours of operation. (If conditions are felt to be unfair by the applicant, the permit can be reviewed by Council). 4. No one authorized to conduct excavation on the site, except the ap- plicant. 5. No transfer of title of all or part of the special use permit site during the life of the permit unless reviewed and approved by the Council. 6. The Applicant sign an agreement, agreeing to the above conditions. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 6. Special Use Permit (Public Utility Facility) -South of County Road D and west of Hazelwood Street (continued from January 20, 1972) a. Manager Miller stated he had received a letter from Northern States Power informing the Village that they have met with various officials relative to the drainage and highway construction in the area of their proposed substation site. The Village Engineer stated that the plans for the highway interchange was not, in fact, the same as those presented to the Village Council. Staff still recommends the setback as provided in the original recommendation. The drainage can be handled, but it is a misstatement to say that it will not result in 'additional problems'. At the request of the County Commission the Metropolitan Council is con - sidering this proposal today and will be providing a recommendation on the proposal. b. Mayor Axdahl asked for further comments by Northern States Power Co. Gary Anderson, representative of Northern States Power Company, spoke on behalf of the proposed development. He stated that N.S.P. Co, will adhere to the staff conditions, and will work with the Council, the State and the County. c. Mayor Axdahl asked if there were any persons in the audience who wished to be heard regarding this matter. No one was heard. d. Councilwoman Olson stated she is opposed, based on commitment: for a southerly location, which was indicated last time, to be at County Road B and English. She feels that if this southerly direction is County Road B and English, it is not good. Northern States Power indicated they had four other locations and she questioned if they would be willing to tell the Council where they were and why this particular one was chosen. - 6 - 2/3 e. Councilman Wiegert stated that in regard to the County Road B and English site, he expressed to Northern States Power considerable concern over that, as he is quite well acquainted with that area. The fact that it is used for children going to school, to him, appears to be one of those attractive nuisances which could cause a problem. Northern States Power called and asked, after hearing his concern, if he would meet with them. He did meet with four representatives and they indicated they were studying that and did have alternative locations. Mr. Wiegert stated that he indicated his present willingness to vote against that location. That site is not the subject here tonite. That indicates their willingness to work with us. f. Mayor Axdahl asked if Northern States Power did make such a reference that they did have four alternate locations. Gary Anderson stated that they had said two weeks ago that they had looked at various sites, as they usually do; they studied the areas and chose the County Road D site and stated the reasons for doing so. Two of the other sites looked at were north of 694, in the White Bear area and the other was east of the railroad tracks. They were ruled out for various reasons. At a later time, in the future, if a southerly sight is utilized, they will appear before Council for a Special Use Permit. g. Councilwoman Olson moved to deny the Special Use Permit for Northe States Power Comoanv for the reasons that asthetically it isn't applic to the area Beam Avenue is being constructed for a deversified center and this sub station will be at the very point where people will be en ing the area. Motion died for lack of a second. h. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Wiegert the Special Use Permit and introduced the following resol its adoption: 72 -2 -25 WHEREAS, an application was filed with the Council of the Village of Maplewood by the owner of the following described property, and a hearing was set as provided under Section 915.020 of the Municipal Code of the Village of Maplewood: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 15; thence Westerly along the North line of said Tract A a distance of 985-1 feet; thence Southerly to a point on the South line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 15, said point being 735± feet Westerly of the Easterly line of said Tract B as measured along the South line thereof; thence Easterly along the South line of said Tract B to the Easterly line thereof; thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Tracts A and B to the point of beginning. which has been proposed for Special Use;:Permit to use the property upon which to construct an electric power substation - 7 - 213 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 20, 1972 at 8:00 P.M. in the Village Hall, notice thereof having been duly published in the official Village newspaper, and notices of said hearing having been mailed to all property owners of record within 200 feet of the area proposed for Special Use Permit; and WHEREAS, all objections and recommendations relative thereto were heard by the Village Council; and WHEREAS, it appears for the best interest of the public that said Special Use Permit be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Special Use Permit be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The Village, County, and State should resolve the needed distances and land areas necessary to revamp the interchange of Highway 61 and I 694 and County Road D realignment; 2. The site plan should be adjusted to accommodate the street realignment changes; 3. A landscaping plan including implementation of such should be required prior to final occupancy inspection call and approved by the Department of Community Development; 4. A building permit for starting the development should be ex- ercised within a specified period of time which should be negotiated between the Council and the applicant - but a definite time should be set. No more than 18 months is recommended as a maximum time. Northern States Power Company has indicated in their letter of transmittal that they hope to start by Sept- ember, 1973. 5. The applicant should dedicate 10 feet of right -o£ -way along the north property line adjacent to County Road D in order to more adequately service the area and site with necessary truck traffic. Any realignment rights -of -way for County Road D should be accomplished through normal right -of -way acquisition processes and the applicant appropriately compensated for such. 6. A clearance of 150 feet setback from County Road D should be required. Any new realignment of County Road D should allow for a minimum 150 feet setback from the right -of -way for safety and aesthetics purposes, 7. Drainage of the site should be subject to Village Engineer approval and such shall be secured prior to issuance of any development permits issued by the Village. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Motion carried. Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilmen Greavu, Haugan and Wiegert. Nay - Councilwoman Olson. - 8 - 2/3 7. Deferred Assessments - Kennard Street (continued from January 13, 1972) a. Manager Miller stated this deferred assessment was carried over from the January 13th meeting. Herbert H. Schouveller requests that his sewer assessment be cancelled due to the fact that he was unable to collect a bill resulting from damages he feels a contractor employed by the Vil- lage made on his property. It is recommended that this deferment be continued, but not for the reason stated by the applicant. It is felt that changes in the sewer in that area in the near future may effect this case. At that time the assessment can be reviewed again in light of new developments. b. Mr. Schouveller spoke on behalf of his request. c. Councilman Greavu moved to continue the d Improvement No. 6 assessment of Mr. Herbert H t upon or Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. d. Manager Miller stated the decision on the deferred assessment of Mr. Anton Wicklander had been tabled until after the County Ditch 17 hearing was held. He suggested that it be continued until after the preparation of final plans. e. Councilman Greavu moved to continue the discussion of assessment of Mr_ Anton Wicklander until the final Dlans Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. f. Manager Miller presented a letter from Mrs.sRangitsch which stated she has a parcel of property at the rear of her lot that was assessed. - 9 - 2/3 Staff does not feel there is a legal rsght.to do so, therefore it is re- commended it be cancelled. g. Councilwoman Olson moved to cancel the deferred ect to a service connection charge if the property is built upon and introduced the tollow- its 72 -2 -26 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution 63 -8 -149 of the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, adopted August 22, 1963, the special assessments for the construction of Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 6, were levied and deferred against property described as Code No. 57- 0021- 020 -63; and WHEREAS, this assessment was adopted by error, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer Improvement 6 in the amount of $490.00, against Code No. 57- 0021 - 020 -63 be and the same hereby are, cancelled. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. E. AWARDING OF BIDS None. APPROVAL OF ACCOUNTS Councilman Haugan No. 15490, $312,122.82; Part II - Payrol - 822.210.99) in the amount of $334.333.8 e Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. G. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Elmer Stanke, 910 E. County Road C, stated he wished to have the dirt re- moved, which was left from the last excavation when there was a sewer problem, and also he requests to have the lawn resodded with black dirt, not muck and clay. Manager Miller stated the Village will restore it to its original condition. 2. Mr. Stanke read a paragraph from the December 16, 1971 minutes regarding the liquor license of Donald Fitch. He stated he did not make the statement that was in the minutes. Following considerable discussion, Mayor Axdahl requested that the staff transcribe the portion of the minutes of December 16, 1971 meeting to- gether with the portion of the tape from tonights meeting, so a direct comparison can be made at the next meeting. - 10 - 2/3 3. Councilman Haugan moved to suspend the Rules of Procedure to hear recon- sideration on the Sagstetter action. (Special Use Permit - Planned Unit De- velopment north of Edgerton Highlands) Seconded by Mayor Axdahl. No action was necessary as it was still the Visitor Presentation time. Mayor Axdahl asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak in reference to the action. No one was heard. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Planned Unit Development - Southwest Corner Lakewood Drive and Stillwater Road (Inland Construction Company) a. Manager Miller presented Council a letter from Inland Construction outlining its position concerning the original conditions recommended by the Planning Commission on March 15, 1971. It is stated that they have made certain modifications in their site plan which include reducing the over -all number of units, substituted outdoor swimming pools in court areas for indoor swimming pools and have modified the exterior treatment of the buildings. Two basic questions remain unanswered in this project- - the treatment of the highway right -of -way and the recreation development cost provision of the conditions. The Recreation Policy has been under discussion. The legal aspects of the highway right -of -way are now being studied by the Staff. The Staff recommends this item be tabled until February 17, 1972 meeting. Staff is reviewing a method of approving the project on a stage basis. b. Mr. Bob Hennessey, representing the Inland Construction Corporation, spoke. He wished to know what the conditions are that will be imposed on the issuance of that special use permit and when the special use permit will be issued. c. Manager Miller stated that Staff feels they can come up with the con- ditions by February 17th and would like to meet with Inland Construction and discuss the feasibilities of the conditions relative to roads, etc. d. Councilwoman Olson moved to table this matter Seconded by Councilman Creavu. d Construction Cor Ayes - all. 2. Sanitary Sewer Improvement - Larpenteur, Myrtle to Howard Street Metering Station (feasibility report) 11 - 2/3 a. Manager Miller stated the feasibility of replacing the sanitary sewer in Larpenteur Avenue between Myrtle Street and the Howard Street metering station has been reviewed and determined that the project is feasible. The report is based on the Holloway relief sewer being con- structed and the Larpenteur Avenue sewer receiving no flow from Holloway. The original sewer and lift station were installed in 1958 based on low density single family land use. The present and proposed land use now indicates a much higher density. It is proposed that the project be assessed on an area basis for thirty per cent of the cost of the new main. The thirty per cent represents that portion of the reasonably expected life of the existing sewer which has been enjoyed by the property owners. The Village would pick up the rest of the cost. It is also proposed that the assessments be based on land use density. The total estimated cost of the project is $56,640.00 of which $16,992.00 would be assessed and $39,648 would be assumed by the Village. The average cost per assessable acre would be $57.00. A hearing date of March 16, 1972 is recommended. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 -2 -27 WHEREAS, the Village Engineer for the Village of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare preliminary plans for the construction of a sanitary sewer main in Larpenteur Avenue between Myrtle Street and the Howard Street metering station, and WHEREAS, the said Village Engineer has prepared the aforesaid prelim- inary plans for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the Village Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Larpenteur Avenue between Myrtle Street and the Howard Street metering station by construction of sanitary sewer main is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accord- ance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to M.S.A. Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $56,640.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the Village Hall at 1380 Frost Avenue on Thursday the 16th day of March, 1972, at 7:45 P.M. to consider said improvement. The notice for said public hearing shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING SANITARY SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: - 12 - 2/3 WHEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and expedient that the improvement hereinafter described, be made, NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the Village Council will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within the said Village: Date and Time: March 16, 1972 at 7:45 P.M. Location: Council Chambers of the Village Hall 1380 Frost Avenue The general nature of the improvement is the construction of sanitary sewer main in Larpenteur Avenue between Myrtle Street and the Howard Street metering station. The total estimated cost of said improvement is $56,640.00; It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by said improvement whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improve- ment should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under the authority granted by Chapter 429 M.S.A. Dated this 3rd day of February, 1972. BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL Lucille Aurelius, Village Clerk Village of Maplewood Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 3. Recreation Development Costs, a. Manager Miller stated the proposed recreation policy would establish an acquisition development charge to developers in a community based on costs by neighborhoods. The charge would be based on the costs of devel- oping parks for a given neighborhood, also on population to be enumerated by the development. Staff would like some guidance as to finances. b. Considerable discussion was held regarding the proposal. A 'shirt sleeve' session was held on February 1, 1972 and Council stated another 'shirt sleeve' session will be held on Thursday, February 10, 1972 to discuss the recreation policy in detail. 4. Subdivision (Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 7) - Change Order. - 13 - 2/3 a. Manager Miller stated this is change order number two for this subdivision. The change order adds a unit for 18 -inch concrete pipe at $9.96 per foot to correct an omission in the original design. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 -2 -28 RESOLVED, by the Village Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that Change Order Number 2 to the contract for construction of Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement No. 71 -3 in the amount of $2,171.28 be and hereby is in all things approved. FURTHER, that the Mayor and Clerk be and hereby are authorized and instructed to execute the said Change Order for and on behalf of the Village. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 5. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement (No. 71 -3) Final Payment. a. Manager Miller stated this is the authorization of final payment for the sanitary sewer and water main in Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 7 to the Houle Sewer and Trenching Inc, in the amount of $24,477.06. It is requested that $1,000.00 be withheld pending review in the spring. b. Councilwoman Olson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 -2 -29 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the Village, Houle Sewer and Trenching, Inc, has satisfactorily completed Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement No. 71 -3 in accordance with such contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the work completed under such contract is hereby accepted and approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village Clerk and Mayor are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the payment on such contract, subject to withholding $1,000.00 pending review of the project in the Spring. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 6. State Electrical Code - Ordinance No. 306 (Second Reading) a. Manager Miller stated this ordinance will go into effect March 1, 1972. Final adoption is recommended. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: 14 - 2/3 ORDINANCE NO. 306 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 306 AND CHAPTER 313 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE PERTAINING TO ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 306 is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Chapter 306 is hereby adopted to read as follows: "Chapter 306. ELECTRICAL FEES Section 306.010. The rules of the State Board of Electricity as amended through December 28, 1971, Chapter 1, Sections 1 through 10 is hereby adopted as the inspection and fee ordinance of the Village of Maplewood and is hereby incorporated in and made a part of this code as completely as if said provisions were set out in full." Section 2. Chapter 313 is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Chapter 313 is hereby adopted to read as follows: "Chapter 313. THE LAWS AND RULES GOVERNING ELECTRICIANS AND ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS Section 313.010. The Minnesota Electrical Act, Minnesota Statutes 326.01 through 326.248 as amended to December 31, 1971, together with the Rules of the State Board of Electricity, Chapters 2, 3 and 4 are hereby adopted as the electrical code of the Village of Maplewood regulating electricians and elec- trical installations in the Village of Maplewood. The Sections of Minnesota Statutes herein referred to and the Rules of the Minnesota State Board of Elec- tricity herein referred to are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this code as completely as if said provisions were set out in full. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication and March 1, 1972 whichever occurs last. Passed by the Council of the Village of Maplewood this 3rd day of February, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. 7. Dog License Fee - Ordinance No. 307 (Second Reading) a. Manager Miller stated the ordinance is recommended for final adoption. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 307 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1101 OF THE MAPLEWOOD CODE PRETAINING TO ANIMALS - 15 - 2/3 THE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1101.040 is hereby repealed in its entirety and a new Section 1101.040 is hereby adopted to read as follows: Section 1101.040. PERMIT FEES. Upon a showing by any applicant for a permit that he is prepared to comply with the regulations promulgated by the Council, a permit shall be issued following payment of the applicable fee, as follows: (a) for each dog, $1.50; (b) no fee or permit shall be required of any farmer for farm animals other than a farm dog; (c) no fee or permit shall be required of any humane society or veterinary hospital; (d) for each animal of other species an amount to be determined by the Council and provided the Council approves the permit for such animal. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication. Passed by the Council of the Village of Maplewood this 3rd day of February, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Voter Registration a. Councilwoman Olson moved to table Item I -1 until the meeting of February 17, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Haugan. *Ayes - Mayor Axdahl, Councilwoman Olson, Councilmen Greavu and Haugan. Nay - Councilman Wiegert. *Vote taken after considerable discussion was heard. b. Manager Miller stated this item was placed on the agenda by Mr. Michael T. Wasiluk. The letter stated he would like to appear on February 17 and there was a misunderstanding as the Manager thought he wished to appear tonight. 2. Building Plan Review (Service Station) Southwest Corner of Cope and White Bear Avenues. a. Manager Miller stated building plans have been presented for the - 16- 2/3 erection of a service station at the southwest corner of Cope and White Bear Avenues. The proposal meets all of the Village codes. Approval is recommended with conditions; b. Mr. Bill Itnipel, Field Engineer from Mobile Oil Company, spoke on behalf of the proposal. c. Councilman Greavu moved approval of the building plans of Mobil Oil Company to construct a service station at the southwest corner of Cope and White Bear Avenues subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposal conforms to all standards outlined for service stations in Section 907.030 of the Code. 2. Because of sight clearance problems no storage should be allowed on site except along the west property line; Likewise any snow depths in excess of 30 inches total should be removed from the open lawn areas on the north and east sides of the site. 3. No pennants, banners, G- Strings, fringe, or flipper type attractive nuisances shall be allowed. Also no outdoor storage, sales, rental, or promotion of trailers, cars, trucks, campers, cases of soft beverages, or miscellaneous sales of any type shall be allowed. 4. No car washes shall be allowed on the site outside of any building due to insufficient on -site space to adequately accommodate this—activity, as well as, the undesirability of such soap materials being attracted into the storm drainage system of the Village. 5. No flashing blinker signs shall be allowed. 6. Submission of a landscape plan prepared by a landscape architect or landscape designer prior to occupancy permit. Such plan shall include implementation. 7. No outdoor open storage of tires, cans, etc. The storage of such shall be enclosed and contained within dumpsters and /or bins completely en- closed from view. 8. The exterior of the structure shall have a stone facia exterior to be compatible with surrounding approved developments. 9. The maximum signs (free standing including pedestal sign) shall be limited to 3 signs on the premises. 10. All lighting (exterior) shall be subject to Village staff approval. 11. No outdoor storage of partially dismantled autos shall be allowed. Inoperable autos shall be allowed no,longer than 48 hours to be stored on the site regardless of conditions. 12. All driveway ingress- egress points shall be subject to Village Engineer approval. - 17 - 2/3 13. During station bulk fuel loading and loading no blocking, parking, or backing onto any public streets shall be allowed - all manuver- ing shall occur on site. 14. All outside waste receptacles shall be secured to the ground and be capable of anchoring to avoid blowing away during winds. Paper toweling, for car window washing, to be allowed only if a container is provided specifically for that use. 15. A building permit shall be drawn within 60 days from Council approval of plans. 16. Provide fencing. 17. Written agreement by applicant agreeing to all conditions prior to issuance of the building permit. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 3. Snowmobile Regulations - Request for Review. a. Manager Miller stated this item was placed on the agenda at the request of a citizen. He was informed that he should present proposals to the Council in writing if he wished some action. A written proposal has not been submitted to me at the time of this writing. b. Roger Fontaine, President of the Maplewood Snowmobile Club, requested that Maplewood review their Snowmobile Regulations to conform with the surrounding communities. They would like 1500 feet of street running, to allow snowmobilers to get to a marked snowmobile trail and also time limit changed to 11:00 P.M. on week days and 2:00 A.M. on Fridays and Saturdays and evenings preceeding holidays, and that it be mandatory to have flags posted on the machines. c. Mr. Fontaine was instructed to bring in a list of his recommendations and they will consider this at the "Shirt Sleeve" Session, Thursday night; also to bring in parallel regulations of the surrounding communities. 4. De- annexation Request a. Manager Miller stated property owned by James D. Swan on North Lake Boulevard is located partially in Maplewood and partially in North St. Paul. He has requested that the portion in Maplewood be detached from Maplewood and annexed by North St. Paul. This was discussed previously by the Council and was referred to the Village of North St. Paul for the preliminary action. The Village of North St. Paul has now taken action to annex the property upon detachment from Maplewood. The detachment is recommended. b. Councilman Greavu introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 2 - 30 - 18 - 2/3 WHEREAS, Mr. James D. Swan, 2932 North Lake Boulevard, North St. Paul, Minnesota is the owner of the following described land located within the corporate limits of the Village of Maplewood: Part of block 10 described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said block thence south on the west line thereof to the southwest corner thereof, thence east at right angles 75 feet, thence northwesterly to the beginning, being part of block 10 LAKESIDE PARK ADDITION TO NORTH ST. PAUL, and WHEREAS, this property abuts the homestead property of Mr. James D. Swan which is located within °the corporate limits of the Village of North St. Paul; and WHEREAS, Mr. James D. Swan by letter dated March 18, 1971 requested that the above - described land be detached from the Village of Maplewood and annexed to the Village of North St. Paul; and WHEREAS, the power to detach and annex such property is vested in the Minnesota Municipal Commission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 414, Section 414.061; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the Village of Maple- wood, pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.061, that the Minnesota Municipal Commission is hereby requested to detach the following land from within the corporate limits of the Village of Maplewood: Part of block 10 described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said block thence south on the west line thereof to the southwest corner thereof, thence east at right angles 75 feet, thence northwesterly to the beginning, being part of block 10 LAKESIDE PARK ADDITION TO NORTH ST. PAUL, and to have the same annexed to the Village of North St. Paul. Adopted by the Village Council of Maplewood this 3rd day of February, 1972. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 5. Gas Rate Study Group - Joint Powers Agreement. a. Manager Miller stated he has been meeting with the managers of other communities in the area and NSP in an effort to work towards the possibil- ityof?theformulation of a gas rate authority in NSP's Minnesota service area. It is recommended that the Village of Maplewood enter into a joint agreement to prepare a gas rate authority through a joint powers agreement. The first step will be the entering into an agreement with the communities of White Bear Lake, New Brighton, North St. Paul, Roseville, Stillwater, South St. Paul, Winona and St. Cloud in establishing a study group. The study group will prepare a proposed gas rate authority joint powers agree - ment for all municipalities serviced with natural gas by NSP. The cost - 19 - 2/3 for the preparation_of this agreement will be defrayed by NSP in an amount up to $1,000.00. Approval is recommended. In addition he asked that the Council appoint him as the representative to this study group. b. Councilman Wiegert moved authorization to enter into an agreement to prepare a gas rate authority through a joint powers agreement to es- tablish a study group and to appoint Manager Miller as the Council's representative. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 6. Proposed Ordinances: a. Dumping 1. Manager Miller stated the proposed ordinance would make the is- suance of dumping permits an administrative function under the Depart- ment of Public Works. The Manager recommended the ordinance be placed on first reading. 2. Councilman Greavu introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 308 Amending Maplewood Code Relating To Dumping Seconded by Councilman Haugan. Ayes - all. b. Sewer Charge (large services) 1. Manager Miller stated the proposed ordinance will establish sewer charges based on water usage for larger customers (over 2 -inch meters). 2. Finance Director Ashworth explained the proposed rate structure. 3. Councilman Wiegert introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption ORDINANCE NO. 309 Sewer Rates Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. c. Snowmobile (Adoption of State Provisions) 1. Councilwoman Olson moved to,delete Item I 6 -c from the agenda. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. 7. Lot Divisions - 20- 2/3 a. Village Planner Seida explained the proposed lot division. It is on the west side of Clarence Street between Summer and Ripley. It is to divide three mid -block lots into two lots, which would result in two 60 foot wide lots. Recommendation is to approve with the condition that the outstanding remaining balances of water and sewer assessments be paid.at the time of Village Engineer approval of certification to the auditor. Councilwoman Olson moved to approve the lot division subject to the condition that the water and sewer assessments be maid. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. b. Jehovah Witness (925 No. Century Avenue) Village Planner Seida explained the lot division requested by the Jehovah Witness Church on Century Avenue. Staff recommends the lot division be approved. Councilman Greavu moved to approve the lot division request of the Jehovah Witness Church, 925 No. Century Avenue. Seconded by Councilwoman Olson. Ayes - all. c. Northern States Power Facility Proposal Village Planner Seida explained this division to be the property where the proposed Northern States Power facility is being planned, that was discussed tonight. Planner Seida stated he could not advise Council on this one, only make Council aware of it. There is some uncertainty as to the precise location and would like to go back to Northern States Power for some revised property lines. This will be coming back to Council. No action required tonight. S. Hearing: Dates a. Zone Change Request (R -1 to R -2) 1. Manager Miller stated this zone change is located between Duluth and Frank Streets and is requested by Mr. Michael Wasiluk. A hearing date of March 16, 1972 is recommended. 2. Councilman Greavu moved to set March 16, 1972 as the hearing d Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. b. Beam Avenue Improvement (Pond) 1. Manager Miller stated this hearing will be for an amendment to the Beam Avenue improvement project. This is for the ponding area and is required if bonds are to be issued. - 21 - 2/3 2. Councilman Haugan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 2 - 31 WHEREAS, the Council of the Village of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, has determined that it is reasonable, necessary and for a public purpose that a ponding area be acquired and developed, to- gether with appurtenant structures in conjunction with additional im- provements and as an amendment of the Beam Avenue Improvement Project heretofore approved and adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the Village Council'' will hold a public hearing on said improvement at the following time and place within said Village: DATE AND TIME: March 2, 1972 at 8:00 P.M. LOCATION: Council Chambers of the Village Hall 1380 Frost Avenue. The general nature of the improvement is the acquisition and im- provement of a ponding area and appurtenant structures for the retent- ion of storm waters from the Beam Avenue Improvement Project and addit- ional costs incurred in the construction of Beam Avenue at an estimated cost of $900,000 and the area proposed to be assessed is described as that property abutting both sides of Beam Avenue between White Bear Avenue and Hazelwood. Seconded by Councilman Creavu. Ayes - all. J. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Mayor Axdahl wondered how much time was given on notices on special uses, etc., when on one instance recently they only got four days notice. Village Planner Seida stated that ten days advanced notice is required by our Ordinance. The problem in Maplewood is our mail service. It is very poor and sometimes takes quite some time to arrive at its destination. They must go, when mailed here, to North St. Paul, sorted, then to downtown St. Paul, sorted, then back to North St. Paul, sorted, then delivered. Staff will look into the situation and report back to Council. 2. Mayor Axdahl stated he had received a copy of a resolution from Ramsey County Library in regard to Cable T.V. He read the resolution.: The resolution is to be filed and no action taken. 3. Councilwoman Olson wondered how many people were notified on the Sagstetter Special Use Permit hearing. The required number of people were notified. K. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 22 - 2/3 1. Manager Miller stated that the J and W Boat Works has been unable to secure a bond. They have assured us they will comply with the required conditions by July 1, 1972. Council may waive the bond if they so desire. Village Attorney Don Lais stated that J & W Boat Works has an ownership problem 'that they are working on. They are having trouble getting a bond, partially because of their history of not complying with the Village conditions. Attorney Lais feels we will be in a stronger position in July to revoke the occupancy permit. The Village should inform them that we have been advised of their inability to get the bond and under the circumstances we will give them to July lst to comply and if they fail to do so by that time, we will most certainly revoke their occupancy permit. This should be done by registered mail. Councilman Haugan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 72 - 2 - 32 WHEREAS, J and W Boat Works has tried and been unable to obtain a per - formance bond to comply with the continuance of their occupancy permit; BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the requirement that the J and W Boat Works pro- vide a $2,500 bond as a condition of continuing their occupancy permit is hereby waived. Seconded "by Councilmail Wiegert. Ayes - all. G 2. Manager Miller stated that next Monday evening, February 7, 1972, the Refuse Collection Committee will be meeting with the haulers, in the coffee room, to try to resolve some of the problems. Considerable discussion on the problems of the refuse haulers was heard. 3. Manager Miller presented Council a letter from Ramsey County regarding snow- mobiles in Battle Creek Park. 4. Manager Miller presented Council a letter he had received from the Pollut- ion Control Agency regarding approving of sewer extensions. 5. Village Engineer Collier stated that regarding the street "light requested on Larpenteur Avenue, this is a County Street and Ramsey County has stated they haven't any funds available to place a light there. No action is required at this time. L. ADJOURNMENT 12:02 A.M. City Clerk -n- Is DECEMBER 16, 1971 MEETING: ELMER STANKE: "I could be 100% wrong, but it seems to me that I remember that a Mr. Fitch contributed to one of the candidates re- cently in the recent election, and he could be kind of biased when it comes to issuing a license here. Did he not contribute to your campaign Mr. Wiegert ?" COUNCILMAN WIEGERT: "Yes." .'!My name is Lawrence Ryle, on County Road B. This is a letter I submitted to the Village Manager, I would like to read it for the record etc-- - - - - -" COUNCILMAN WIEGERT: "Going back to the previous question raised by Mr. Stanke, should I step down and not vote. I have the check, I can return it, I have not cashed it." MAYOR AXDAHL: "------- - - - - -- abstain at the time of voting." COUNCILMAN WIEGERT: "Alright." MAYOR AXDAHL: "Is this agreeable to the Council ?" COUNCILMAN WIEGERT: "At the time of receiving the check, Mr. Fitch was a former partner at the Fox and Hounds and I was not aware of this." COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 1972: Mr. Elmer Stanke, 910 E. County Road C, read the following paragraphs from the Council Minutes of December 16, 1971: "Mr. Elmer Stanke stated that Donald Fitch had contributed to the election campaign of Councilman Donald Wiegert and therefore should not take part in the discussion." "Councilman Wiegert stated Mr. Fitch had contributed to his campaign, but the check had never been cashed and if it were the wish of the Council, he would return it or not vote on the issue ". Mr. Stanke stated: "First of all, I never at any time made a statement that Donald Fitch contributed to Mr. Wiegert's campaign; I asked this question: How the Clerk ever misconstrued this in taking it off of the tape, I will never know. But none the less, this is exactly what was said, "Did either of you recently elected Councilmen accept a contribution from a Mr. Fitch for your campaign ?" After not receiving an answer from either one of you gentlemen, I asked this question, I said: "Mr. Wiegert, did you accept a contribution from a Mr. Fitch for your campaign ?" Mr. Wiegert said "yes, I did receive a contribution from Mr. Fitch, but I never cashed the check ". I said, "In light of this, then I feel your thinking on this matter would be biased." At no time did I suggest that he take no part in the discussion, at no time did I make the statement that Mr. Wiegert had accepted a contribution from Mr. Fitch and I vigorously object to the wording in these minutes and feel they should be amended to read as they are stated on the tape." Councilman Greavu: "Mr. Stanke, I wasn't even brought into that conversation ". Councilman Wiegert: "I didn't hear that first question ". Councilman Greavu: "I'll ask that the tape be brought up here next meeting." Councilman Wiegert: "I don't want any tape brought up here, I would be will- ing to have the Clerk type it up literally. It's too hard to listen to tapes up here, I think it is a waste of time." Mr. Stanke: "I don't think it's a waste of time at all, in fact I would like the tapes brought up here." Councilman Wiegert: "Alright, let's have the Clerk and the Attorney listen to the tapes and do it, I don't want to waste the time of fifty people up here, trying to listen to something you can't get worth a darn." Mayor Axdahl: "I would like then, that the Staff transcribe the portion of the tape in question together with the portion of the tape from tonight's meeting, so a direct comparison can be made at the next meeting." Mr. Stanke: "At no time did I ever question whether you did cash that check, you said you didn't and I took your word and I'm not questioning it now." Councilman Wiegert: "I don't think that question ever arose." Mr. Stanke: "Except that you said that you did not cash the check." - 1 - Councilman Wiegert: "Yah, but, I mean - -" Mr. Stanke: "In light of that statement, I think you also owe an answer, at least to the Council, and to the citizens of this Village. I have your financial statement, which is in the hands of the Village Clerk. I have reviewed this financial statement, on the 6th of December, on the 16th of December, 1971 and January 21st of 1972. These were the contributions you received, Mr. Wiegert and they are all legal, there is no doubt about it." Councilman Wiegert: "Mr. Mayor, point of order; is this the sort of thing that the Council feels we should take up our time with ?" Mr. Stanke: "I believe so, because there is some controversy on this financial statement, and I think you owe an answer to this Council and to the citizens of this Village." Councilman Wiegert: "I don't know that this is the forum for that, that's what I am asking. Mayor Axdahl: "I am suggesting that election laws are regulated by the Sec- retary of State, if you have an irregularity which you wish to pursue I would suggest that you pursue it through the Secretary of State, which is the govern- ing body for election laws." Councilman Wiegert: "Or the County Attorney or the State Attorney General." Mr. Stanke: "Then, obviously Mr. Mayor, you are sanctioning - -" Mayor Axdahl: "No, I am not sanctioning anything. I would make this comment, that as election official, the Clerk of this Village, is responsible, not to the Council of this Village, but to the Secretary of State." Mr. Stanke: "In that light, I will then go to the Secretary of State. The financial statement that Mr. Wiegert has given to the Village Clerk, the figures do not jive with what he has been telling us - -that he has not cashed this check from Mr. Fitch, yet shows contributions for $210 dollars and his expenses were $205. His contributions included Mr. Fitch's $50.00." Councilman Wiegert: "I don't wish to take up the Council's time with this, or the 50 or 75 people who are here. Put it in the paper, that's the place for it." Mr. Stanke: " I don't suppose you do, Mr. Wiegert." Mr. Axdahl: "If you have an action to take, I suggest you go to the 'Secretary of State. The Council has no authority in the regulation of elections." Mr. Stanke: "I realize you don't have any authority so far as the election is concerned, but Mr. Wiegert made a statement to this Council in regards to a contribution which wasn't cashed, yet he shows :! this contribution in his finan- cial statement and his contributions amounted to $210 and that included the check from Mr. Fitch, and his expenses are $205." Councilman Wiegert: "Mr. Mayor, I will ask again that this discussion be ruled out of order." �m Mayor Axdahl: "The discussion is ruled out of order." Mr. Stanke: "Yah, I see exactly how you stand, Mr. Mayor." Mayor Axdahl: "I stand that the Secretary of State is responsible for the governing of the elections of this Village." - 3 - MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 3, 1972: (Voter Registration) Manager Miller stated that this item was placed on the agenda at the request of Michael T. Wasiluk. Mr. Wasiluk claims "harassment" of seventeen and eigh- teen year olds in the registration process. Manager Miller read the letter from Mr. Wasiluk and it does state he would like to appear on February 17th and there was a misunderstanding, as the Manager thought he wished to appear tonight. He further stated that he had enclosed in their packets a letter from the Village Clerk, dealing with a specific case that happened. "Mr. Wasliuk, as far as I know, was not involved in this particular case. The letter went to a Darryl Olson, who was the one who came in with younger people on January 21st, where as you can see, tempers were lost and the letter apologizes'for that. We have a letter from the attorney stating that a person under 18 years of age can apply for registration. We are now taking applications from those under 18 years of age." Councilman Greavu: " What started this? Did they all come in at one time, or what happened ?" Manager Miller: "In this particular case a number of young people came in with Mr. Olson and asked to be registered and at time the Clerk stated she had no legal authority or legal opinion, but one had been requested and I believe, at that time, tempers got short and the Village Clerk did ask the Village Attorney for an opinion, which he gave as we could not register them, but take application and register them prior to an election. This was done and this is the policy we are following now and to my knowledge there have been no further problems." Councilman Wiegert: "Mr. Mayor,it would appear we are going through a process which I wanted to question if it was necessary to do, but I guess that answer is there. If the thing is settled and is being handled well, I am rather at a loss to know what is requested of the Council to do at this point, if there is nothing to do, I suggest, like tonight, for example, we have two pages full of things, wanting us to do something and if it's all over with I would rather not have it on the agenda." Councilwoman Olson: "I think we have an obligation. He has asked to be put on the agenda and we have an obligation. We don't know what he is going to talk about." Councilman Wiegert: "If he wants to tell us that thing happened, I would sug- gest we can inform him that we know it happened and that things are now operat- ing well and if there isn't anything he wants us to do that he might save a lot of people's time. I.would hate to have a whole room full of people sitting and feeding a dead horse. If that's possible, communicate with him and suggest that if he's just going to review the matter, we'd rather not do it. That's my thinking on it, I don't know how much agreement I have." Councilman Greavu: "We should now set up a time to do these things, and make notice in the papers and at the schools that we are going to register." Attorney Lais: "This section of the law is not really very clear. I don't know what happened out here in regard to registration. This section of the law says, "A party can register for an election, if he will be eligible to vote - 1 - at the next regular election." That is how it is phrased, it doesn't refer to age. My interpretation is that it does apply to age; in other words, if someone will be 18 by the next election he could register now. The information I have is that it never has been a problem before that standard oath was taken when he was 21. There has never been any opinions on this particular subject by the Attorney General, that I found." Councilman Wiegert: "Instead of spending one night discussing this, we are spending two nights." Mayor Axdahl: "I do think there is a real question to be resolved here, and that is whether or not persons should be registered as of January or February for presumably a November election, at which time they may well be in some other voting district. It is my understanding that a student, for instance, is eligible to vote in the municipality in which he goes to school at that time, if he chooses to declare that his residence. It would seem to me that there are some questions with respect to registering in terms of applying for a reg- istration and being put in the files. It raises some other questions, assume that for some reason the Council calls a special election in September or October and they register and now have their names in the file, and they become 18 the first of November, what happens then? Do we go through and look for those instances, they would be isolated instances, through the entire voting file or what is the mechanism by which we can have some reasonable approach in our own operation." Councilwoman Olson: "I would suggest that, since this discussion can be placed on the 17th and there will probably be people here to discuss these questions at that time, rather than spend too much time now." Mayor Axdahl: "There is a motion before the floor to table this to the 17th of February. All in favor say Aye." Councilman Wiegert: "On the basis of what I figure the discussion will be about, I vote "NO "." Motion carries 4 to 1. Councilman Greavu: Under this form of government I understood that it was up to the Manager to take care of the situation and I presume he has. What can Council do ?" Councilman Wiegert: "There is an awful lot of that stuff over which this Council has no purview. In many instances it is an acting functionory of the Secretary of State. The whole thing seems to be something we have no control over." Councilwoman Olson: " I have had many phone calls, and I would like to clarify it for the people who have had the problem and have called me and they have asked to be heard, I would like to see this discussed, if the Council chooses at that point not to discuss it, then let it be said at that point to those people." - 2 - MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS 8:30 P.M., Thursday, February 3, 1972 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 72-1 A. CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Board of Adjustments and Appeals of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood Municipal Building and was called to order at 8:30 P.M. by Chairman Haugan. B. ROLL CALL Harald L. Haugan Present Lester G. Axdahl Present John C. Greavu Present Patricia L. Olson Present Donald J. Wiegert Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilman Wiegert moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 71-7 (December 16, 1971) be approved as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. Councilwoman Olson nominated Harald Haugan as Chairman of the Board of Ad- justments and Appeals. Seconded by Mayor Axdahl. Ayes - all. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Variances (Board of Adjustments and Appeals) a. Parking Requirements - Zayrets Shoppers City (8:15 P.M.) 1. Chairman Haugan convened the meeting for a public hearing on the request of Zayre`s Shoppers City variance from minimum Zoning Code requirement regarding parking. The Manager read the notice of hearing along with the dates of publication. 2. Manager Miller presented the following staff report: The Staff recommends denial of the variance request due to what is felt a critical parking need around this facility. The variance, if granted, would provide for a maximum variance of 162 spaces. If variances are to be granted the following guide lines are suggested: 1) The variance for the Christmas tree sale still be denied due to maximum building sales demand for off-street parking; 2) Tent and garden sales variances be restricted to times in- dicated on the applicants request and for the specific purposes indicated; 1 - 2/3 3) The tent sales area be moved twenty feet south to the south property line to facilitate better traffic circulation and minimize the number of parking spaces affected; 4) The signing and circulation system be approved by the Vit=. lage Engineer and Police Chief; 5) All signs advertising the outdoor facilities require Village permit and must be kept in good repair and moved within two days upon termination of the dates outlined by the applicant; 6) The east side of VanDyke Atreet be posted for no parking and that other periphery areas be evaluated for possible no parking designations; 7) The applicant sign a statement agreeing to the conditions imposed by the Village Council. 3. Chairman Lyman Coombs read the following Planning Commission's motion: "Commissioner Barrett moved that the Commission advise the Board that the Commission has failed to reach a majority recommendation on this matter. Commissioner Stolzman seconded. Motion failed to carry a majority with the following vote: For: Coombs, Stolzman, Barrett, Batman. Against: Singer, Mogren, Kishel, Howard." 4. Chairman Haugan called for proponents. Mr. Mel Roth, Zayre's Shoppers City, spoke on behalf of the Variance request, and stated he objects to a couple of the items in the conditions and asked for clarification of them. 5. Chairman Haugan asked for opponents. None were heard. 6. Chairman Haugan called for formal objections. None were heard. 7. Chairman Haugan closed the public hearing. 8. Councilman Wiegert moved to grant the variance request based on feeling that our Ordinance on parking requirements does not fit this type of operation of Zayre's Shoppers City for the three instances on a permanent basis; Christmas Tree Sales between December 1 and December 25; Garden Center between April 1 to July 15, in spaces indicated; and for a one week period a tent sale between July 1 and September 1, subject to the following conditions: 1. The tent sales area be moved twenty feet south of the south property line to facilitate better traffic circulation and minimize the number of parking spaces affected; 2. The signing and circulation system be approved by the Village Engineer and Police Chief; 3. All signs advertising the outdoor facilities require Village permit and must be kept in good repair and moved within two days upon termination of the dates outlined by the applicant; 4. The applicant sign a statement agreeing to the conditions imposed by the Village Council. - 2 - 2/3 i b. Seconded by Councilwoman Olson. Ayes - all. Setback Requirement - Southwest Corner of Edgerton Street and Skillman Avenue (8:30 P.M.) 1. Chairman Haugan convened the meeting for a public hearing on the request of the MJM Construction Company to vary from the minimum set back requirement to erect four above ground propane storage tanks surrounded by a six foot woven board fence to be located 15 feet from the street property line. The Manager read the notice of hearing along with the dates of publication. 2. Manager Miller presented the following Staff report: "It is recommended that the variance be denied, and that the applicant be required to show alternated that can be provided for interruptible standby service to serve the site. The re- commendation of denial is based upon the fact that there is no hardship demonstrated, an alternate standby system is available, the area is developed to its maximum lot coverage, the visual amenities are adversely affected, there is an increased explosive hazard in a high density area, and a variance would constitute a special priviledge to this site which is currently denied all other multiple family residential areas in the neighborhood." Manager Miller stated he had received a letter from the MJM Construct- ion Company requesting this hearing be continued to a later date. The Staff recommends to proceed with the hearing. 3. Chairman Lyman Coombs read the following Planning Commission report: "Commissioner Howard moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the Board that the variance petition be denied for the reasons ad- vanced in the staff report. _ Commissioner Batman seconded. Motion carried - Ayes all." 4. Chairman Haugan called for proponents. None were heard. There was no one present from the MJM Construction Company. 5. Chairman Haugan called for opponents. The following were heard: Mr. Robert Handschin, 2029 Edgerton Street. 6. Chairman Haugan called for formal objections: The following were heard: Mr. Robert Handschin, 2029 Edgerton Street 7. Chairman Haugan closed the Public Hearing. 8. Councilwoman Olson moved to deny the variance request of MJM Construction Company based on the Staff and Planning Commission reports. Seconded by Councilman Greavu. Ayes - all. - 3 - 2/3 `- E. ADJOURNMENT 9:19 P.M. i L City Clerk - 4 - 2/3 PART I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FEES - SERVICES - EXPENSES FEBRUARY 3,--197.0 ITEM NO. CHECK NO. CLAIMANT PURPOSE AMOUNT 1. 15352 Thomas DeCorsey Refund- spl.use permit $ 25.00 2. 15353 Dale Anderson Refund - Swr.rental 10 50 3. 15354 R. E. Capp Refund - Swr,rental 21,00 4. 15355 T. A. Schifsky & Sons Material for 71 -3 15,928.50 5. 15356 Minn. State Treas. -PERA 1/14/72 remittance 2,515.20 6. 15357 City and County Cr. Union 1/28/72 remittance 1,196.50 7. 15358 Minn. State Treas._PERA 1/14/72 remittance 1,624.10 8. 15359 Thomas Arth Official 44.00 9. 15360 Jerry Colbert Official 33.00 10. 15361 John Mlynarczyk Services 75.25 11. 15362 John Monette Services 93.00 12. 15363 Steven Monzel Rink attendant 204.75 13. 15364 Rick Montgomery Rink attendant 70.00 14. 15365 Donna Neely Rink attendant 86.95 15. 15366 Charles Pearson Rink attendant 205.63 16. 15367 Henry Pfarr Rink attendant 10.50 17. 15368 John Scharfbillig Rink attendant 127.65 18. 15369 Diane Peterson Services 24.00 19, 15370 Gerald Grachowski Official 24.00 20. 15371 James Grachowski Official 24.00. 21. 15372 John Fitzenburger Official 8.001 22. 15373 Paul Fitzenberger Official 8.00 23, 15374 Jon Fosselmann Official 20.00 24. 15375 Gary Stadler Official 16.60 25. 15376 John Moore Official 8.00 26. 15377 James Morrell Official 12.00 27. 15378 Gary Egan Official 8.00 28. 15379 Michael Bruneau Official 4.00 29. 15380 Steven Lukin Official 4.00 30. 15381 Robert Anderson Official 4.00 31. 15382 Terry Meier Official 4.00 32, 15383 Lance Carlson Official 4.00 33. 15384 Paul Poliachik Official 8.00 34. 15385 Helen H. Carlson Services 36.00 35. 15386 Mark Peterson Rink Attendant 65.63 36. 15387 Ellen Blank Services 3.75 37. 15388 Michael Brings Official 8.00 38. 15389 Donna Karnuth Services 9.38 39. 15390 R. B. Leaf Official 27.50 40. 15391 Paul Lehner Official 20.00 41. 15392 Gregory Moos Rink attendant 97.13 42. 15393 Harold R. Neau Official 27.50 43. 15394 James Schultz Services 10.00 44. 15395 Gary Egan Official 11.00 45. 15396 Kathleen Timmers Services 2.25 )46. 15397 American National Bank Bonds dated 3/l/62 30,031.22 47. 15398 Advance Stamp Works Supplies 90.61 48. 15399 Aircomm Maintenance 130.50 49. 15400 Ashbach Aggregate Mt. material 722.42 2/3/72 ITEM NO, CHECK NO. CLAIMANT PURPOSE AMOUNT `10, 15401 A.S.P.A. Registration $ 6.75 51. 15402 Int. Chiefs of Police Publication 3.95 52, 15403 Bears Auto Clinic Repairs 12.50 53. 15404 Bd. of Water Comrs. Engineering 766.15 54. 15405 Donald H. Campbell Services- 71 -1'5 540.00 55, 15406 Davis Water Equipment Supplies 79.74 56. 15407 Emergency Vehicle Lease 684.00 57. 15408 Farwell Ozmun Kirk & Co. Supplies 89.02 58. 15409 Fleet Supply Supplies 20.41 59. 15410 Fisher Photo Supply Supplies 14.25 60. 15411 Xerox Maint. and useage 801,59 61. 15412 Gateway Glass Co. Materials 100.00 62. 15413 Howies Lock & Key Service Supplies 3.00 63. 15414 Eugene R. Murray Jan, retainer 737.00 64. 15415 B & E Patrol Jan, contract fee 516.00 65. 15416 Minn, Hospital Service February remittance 3,490.05 66, 15417 Shafer Contracting Estimate No. 9- 70 -5 156,160.49 67. 15418 J. G. Chisholm Elect. inspections 1,400.00 68. 15419 Gulf Oil Corp. Gasoline 961.93 69. 15420 Int. Conf, of Bldg, officials Code books 21.00 70. 15421 Lais & Bannigan Legal services 1,848.30 71. 15422 Lais & Bannigan Legal services 1,791.70 72. 15423 Metropolitan Sewer Bd. Feb. rental 28,342,14 73. 15424 Supt, of Documents Publications 2.00 74. 15425 Lais & Bannigan Legal Services 685.00 75 15426 Lee's Auto Supply Supplies 17.90 76. 15427 McClain Hedman Schuldt Supplies 18.28 17. 15428 Millers Shoe Repairs Services 7.50 78. 15429 3M Company Supplies 320.5.3 79. 15430 Midway Sewer Service Services 22.50 80. 15431 MacQueen Equipment Supplies 3.48 81. 15432 Maplewood P & H Repairs 16.00 82. 15433 Northwestern Tire Supplies 67.59 83. _ 15434 Northern States Power Signal lights 27.63 84. 15435 Oxygen Service Supplies 4.50 85. 15436 Carl W. Poppenberger Agency Bond 416.00 86. 15437 Polar Chevrolet Repairs 11.29 87. 15438 Postmaster Postage 300.00 88. 15439 Postmaster Postage 8,00 89. 15440 Ramsey Co. Treas, Services 5.24 90. 15441 Ramsey Co. Treas. Str.Lighting & Maint. 514.40 91. 15442 Ramsey Co. Treas. Expenses re: Cty. YA17 17.80 92, 15443 Sta -Vis Oil Supplies 154.72 93. 15444 Standart Spring & Alignment Repairs 94.05 94. 15445 SIRI Supplies 127.80 95. 15446 S & T Products Supplies 129.20 96, 15447 Soil Engineering Services - 70 -5 1,662.80 97. 15448 Team Electronics Supplies 15.00 98, 15449 Twin City Filter Maintenance 16,15 )9, 15450 Twentieth Century Printing Supplies 3.00 2/3./72 ITEM NO. CHECK N0, CLAIMANT PURPOSE AMOUNT 100. 15451 James Embertson Jan. retainer $ 33.00 101. 15452 Gregory L. Stafne Expenses 56.25 102. 15453 Jeanne L. Schadt Services 72.00 103. 15454 Thomas L. Hagen Expenses 23.48 104. 15455 University of Minn. Registration 8.00 105. 15456 Northwestern Bell Services 115.47 106. 15457 Northwestern Bell 777 8131 677.93 107. 15458 Herb Tousley Ford Repairs 109.16 108. 15459 S & T Office Products Supplies 39.84 109. 15460 United Electric Corp. Supplies 27.95 110. 15461 Uniforms Unlimited Supplies 24.00 111. 15462 Weber & Troseth Supplies 3.50 112. 15463 Wahl & Wahl Inc. Equipment 482.00 113. 15464 Int. Comm. Services Inc. Supplies 34.00 114. 15465 Monroe Maintenance 150.00 115. 15466 St.Paul Dispatch -Press Publication 28.32 116. 15467 Viedco Sales Equipment 98.00 117. 15468 McNamara Agency Bond 10.00 118. 15469 Labor- Management Relations Subscription 10.00 119. 15470 Fisher Photo Supply Supplies 3.68 120. 15471 IBM Typewriter 567.00 121. 15472 Nardini Fire Equipment Maintenance 4.50 122. 15473 City of St.Paul 3M Fire service 1,600.00 123. 15474 Winfield A. Mitchell Services 70 -5 1,325.00 -_ 124. 15475 Leslie Paper Co. Supplies 110.89 ,, X125. 15476 Home Gas Co. Fuel 383.31 126. 15477 Coca Cola Bottling Midwest Supplies 31.98 127. 15478 Jim's Saw Service Services 2.00 128. 15479 Coast to Coast Supplies 1.58 129. 15480 Capitol Electronics Services 110.00 130. 15481 Big Wheel Auto Stores Supplies 31.57 131. 15482 Reed Tire Sales Services 22.80 132. 15483 Battery Warehouse Supplies 22.47 133. 15484 Frank L. Noyes Services 70 -5 750.00 134. 15485 Anthony Cahanes School expenses 149.50 135. 15486 Kenneth V. Collins School expenses 150.00 136. 15487 Houle Sewer & Trenching Est.No. 3 & 4 71 -3 35,992.64 137. 15488 State of Minn. License tabs 4.25 138. 15489 Joseph A. Zappa School expenses 6,00 139. 15490 R. A. Luxenburg Construction Est. No. 3 71 -2 12,048.00 Check No. 15352 through Check No. 15490 TOTAL PART I $312,122.82 S 2/3/72 PART II 2/3/72 PAYROLL 1 ITEM NO. CHECK NO. CLAIMANT AMOUNT 1. 3748 Vivian R. Lewis $ 207.49 2. 3749 Michael-G. Miller 515.66 3. 3750 Donald W. Ashworth 364.88 4. 3751 Lucille E. Aurelius 276.89 5. 3752 Kenneth J. Casper 231.91 6. 3753 Phyllis C. Green 197.36 7. 3754 Arline J. Hagen 169.66 8. 3755 Betty D. Selvog 197.36 9. 3756 Lydia A. Smail 173.33 10. 3757 Charles E. Anderson 324.33 11. 3758 David L. Arnold 335.06 12. 3759 John H. Atchison 324.29 13, 3760 Anthony G. Cahanes 384.26 14, 3761 Dale K. Clauson 305.62 15. 3762 Kenneth V.Collins 351.46 16. 3763 Dennis S. Cusick 374.25 17. 3764 Dennis J. Delmont 323.70 18. 3765 Robin A. DeRocker 323.75 19. 3766 Richard C. Dreger 330.97 20. 3767 Raymond E. Fernow 319.48 J 21. 3768 Patricia Y. Ferrazzo 263.46' 1 22. 3769 David M. Graf 329.83 23. 3770 Norman L. Green 359.26 24. 3771 Thomas L. Hagen 425.01 25. 3772 Kevin R. Halweg 246.95 26. 3773 James T. Horton 315.65 27. 3774 Donald V. Kortus 69.38 28. 3775 Roger W. Lee 318.51 29. 3776 John J. McNulty 334.62` 30. 3777 Richard M. Moeschter 315.59 31. 3778 Robert D. Nelson 348.66 32. 3779 William F. Peltier 280.61 33. 3780 Dale E. Razskazoff 270.97 34. 3781 Richard W. Schaller 466.15 35. 3782 Robert F. Vorwerk 274.19 36. 3783 Duane J. Williams 306.97 37. 3784 Joel A. White 108.63 38. 3785 Joseph A. Zappa 401.10 39. 3786 Donald W. Skalman 300.70 40. 3787 Gregory L. Stafne 297.65 41. 3788 Pamela J. Schneider 154.70 42. 3789 Marcella M. Mottaz 177.43 43. 3790 Alfred C. Schadt 360.74 44. 3791 Frank J. Sailer 137.38 45. 3792 Bobby D. Collier 513.18 2/3/72 ITEM NO. CHECK NO. CLAIMANT AMOUNT 46. 3793 William C. Cass 335.52 47. 3794 Raymond J. Hite, Jr. 423.90 48. 3795 Janet A. Rois 181.99 49. 3796 Thomas J. Sanders 184.07 50. 3797 Bernard A. Kaeder 361.91 51. 3798 Raymond J. Kaeder 310.12 52. 3799 Henry F. Klausing 298.75 53. 3800 Gerald W. Meyer 255.90 54. 3801 Joseph W. Parnell 258.53 55, 3802 Arnold H. Pfarr 328.86 56. 3803 Joseph B. Prettner. 415.35 57. 3804 Edward A. Reinert 262.74 58. 3805 Myles R. Burke 294.44 59. 3806 Herbert R. Pirrung 404.17 60, 3807 Stanley E. Weeks 286.52 61. 3808 David Germain 249.34 62. 3809 Kevin B. McNulty 123.62 63. 3810 Frank R. Kirsebom 324.34 64. 3811 Anthony T.Barilla 409.46 65. 3812 Richard J. Bartholomew 298.56 66. 3813 LaVerne S. Nuteson 259.06 67. 3814 Gerald C, Owen 296.35 68, 3815 JoAnn C. Christensen 171.97 69. 3816 John P. Joyce 328.10 70. 3817 Eric J. Blank 273.09 71. 3818 Bailey A. Seida 396.63 72. 3819 Judy M, Chlebeck 181.99 73. 3820 Lester G. Axdahl 163.18 74. 3821 John C. Greavu 132.49 75. 3822 Harald L. Haugan 124.69 76. 3823 Patricia L. Olson 124.69 77. 3824 Donald J. Wiegert 124.69 78. 3825 Clifford J. Mottaz 216.94 Check No. 3748 through Check No. 3825 TOTAL PART II $ 22,210.99 Check No. 15352 Through Check No. 15490 TOTAL PART I $ 312,122.82 SUM TOTAL $ 334,333.81 2/3/72 f` ^ L _