HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 12-11 City Council PacketMAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, December 11, 2006
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 06-33
M IIOX91:4111:11.9
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country
C. ROLL CALL
Mayor's Address on Protocol:
Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through
difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with
the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council,
please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. "
1. Minutes from the November 6, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop
2. Minutes from the November 27, 2006 Special City Council Meeting
3. Minutes from the November 27, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop
4. Minutes from the November 27, 2006 City Council Meeting
5. Minutes from the November 30, 2006 Continuation of the 11-27-06 City Council Meeting
F. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
G. APPOINTMENTSIPRESENTATIONS
1. Resolution of Appreciation — Jim Kaczrowski
2. Steve Dobihal — Eagle Scout Project
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Proposed 2007 Property Tax Levy and Adoption of the 2007 Budget
a. Adoption of Resolution Setting the 2007 Tax Levy
b. Adoption of 2007 Ambulance Rates
C. Resolution Adopting the 2007 Budget
1. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one
motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
will be considered separately.
1 . Approval of Claims
2. Assessments for False Alarm Bills
3. Assessments for Ambulance Bills
4. Home Occupation License Review — Grupa (1994 Duluth Street)
5. Conditional Use Permit Review — Woodhill (Dahl Avenue, south of Linwood Avenue)
6. County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to TH 61), City Project 02-07, and County Road D
Extension (West of TH 61), City Project 02-08: Approve Resolution for State Aid Variance
J. AWARD OF BIDS
K. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
L. NEW BUSINESS
Alley Vacation - Driscoll (south of Frost Avenue and east of Walter Street)
2. Walgreens (Northeast Corner of White Bear and Beam Avenues)
a. Lot Division
b. Land Use Plan Amendment (LBC to BC)
c. Zoning Map Change (LBC to BC)
d. Design Review
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request.
The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at
651) 249-2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the
City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council
Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions
can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council
meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to
one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
Agenda Item E1
MINUTES
CITY COUNCILIMANAGER WORKSHOP
Monday, November O0.28U8
Council Chambers, City Hall
A workshop 8f the City Council was held in the Council Ch8nl
to order at 5:00 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
B. ROLL CALL
Diana LOnQh8.Mayor Present
Rebecca Cave C0uDCi|Ole[nb8[ F/r8S8nt
Erik Hh8||e.CouOCi|nn8nnbBr Present
Kathleen JU8nenn8nn Present
Will FloGsb8Ch,{}oVnci|rnennb8r Present
Mayor Longrie
D2.Wood Burning
D3.City Manager
D4.New Ordinances
O5.South Leg ng
O0.Met Council Grant
Seconded bvC0uDC |
Fire Department B
all, and was C8|ked
Fire Chief Lukin provided an overview of the Fire Department organizational chart, history
on the department and future objectives.
Public Safety Dispatch - Councilmember Juenemann gave an update on the status of the
dispatch center transition and the joint meetings held regarding all parties involved.
Councilmember Rossbach spoke regarding residents that have wood burning devices in their
homes and how itaffects surrounding neighbors. R0Gsb8Ch requested that staff look 8L
developing an ordinance addressing the issues and possibly consider regulating standards
for citizens that use wood burning devises for heating their homes.
November 6, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop
3. City Manager Search
COUn[j|rnernb8rRoSsb8Ch requested information regarding the status of the City Manager
search. Mr. Copeland informed council that the issue will be on the November 13, 2006
agenda.
4. New Ordinances
Counci|memberRossbachdiscussed proposed budgeted processes suggested by
COUnc|nlember|UeUe and also mentioned his continued interest in democratic governance
which allows for public input during the budget process.
5. South Leg Meeting
MavorLonoh8 reminded residents of the south |8g
Fire Station on November 9th . The topic of t
6. Met Council Grant
Mayor Lonoh8 informed the counc that Met Cou
good for the city to receive 81.8 million grant for
process.
Mayor Longrie adjourned at 7:05 p.m.
ng held at the Londin Lane
s informed the City that it is looki
November O.20O0 Council/Manager Workshop 2
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
4:00 P.M. Monday, November 27, 2006
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 06-29
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, ai
order at 4:00 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
City Manager Copeland announced that due to an opinion from the
Cities, council will not be going into closed session.
Councilmember Rossbach questioned the manner in which the city
Special Meeting.
B. ROLL CALL
Agenda Item E2
Hall, and was called to
gue of Minnesota
e notice of the
Diana Longrie, Mayor Present
Rebecca Cave Councilmember Present
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Absent
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. 2007 Labor Contract Negotiations-Chuck Bethel, City Attorney for Labor Relations
a. Human Resources Attorney Chuck Bethel explained the manner in which the
council will conduct the meeting, the status of negotiations and the procedure for
otiations Assistant Steve Roy presented further specifics and
council questions.
Aayor Longrie moved to leave the negotiations strategy up to City Manager Copeland
ind Mr. Bethel to do what is right and in the best interest of the city. If it is determined
hev would need to exceed the monev allotted in the budaet. this item will be brouaht
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
E. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Longrie adjourned the meeting at 4:55 p.m.
November 27, 2006 Special City Council Meeting
Agenda Item E3
MINUTES
CITY COUNCILIMANAGER WORKSHOP
Monday, November 27, 2006
Council Chambers, City Hall
5:10 p.m.
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Cha
order at 5:10 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
B. ROLL CALL
Diana Longrie, Mayor
Rebecca Cave Councilmember
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Councilmember
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Cave moved to approve
Seconded by Mayor Longrie
D. NEW BUSINESS
1. Interviews for Environmental and
for
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
City Hall, and was called to
al Resources Commission
ntal and Natural Resources Commission in the
Tom Moibi
James Beardsley
Allen Moore
John Sticha
Dale Trippler
Carol Sherrill
Carole Lynne
Margaret Behrens
The interviews for the two remaining applicants will be held at the December 18, 2006
Council/Manager Workshop.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Longrie adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
November 27, 2006 Council/Manager Workshop 1
Agenda Item E4
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, November 27, 2006
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 06-30
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at City Hall, and was called to order at
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 1
7:00 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
B.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C.ROLL CALL
Diana Longrie, Mayor Present
Rebecca Cave Councilmember Present
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
D.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Longrie moved to approve the agenda as amended.
M1. Garbage Collection
M2. 2006 Election
M3. Electric Franchise Tax
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All
E.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the November 13,2006 Council/Manager Workshop
Councilmember Cave moved to approve the minutes from the November 13, 2006 Council/Manacle
Workshop as presented.
Seconded by Mayor Longrie Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave and
Hjelle
Abstain-Councilmembers Juenemann and
Rossbach
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 1
2. Minutes from the November 13, 2006 City Council Meeting
K8ayorLongha moved to approve the minutes from the November 13, 2006 City Council
Meeting as amended.
Seconded byQ)uOci|membRrCave COUDCi|0R0b8rs;
Cave, Hjelle and Juenemann
Abstain-Counci|nlenlb8rRos8b8Ch
1 Carl Erb, 2354 Hei George Gonzales 2359 Hei
vacation Of the easement through the C0P8[ proper
subsequently declare permanent the temporary cul-
2. Nancy Lazaryan, presented documents to council rE
3. Ed Fitzgerald, 3284K88rnie Court, Maplewood, than
willingness to take abuse from the "populous" in ord
hts, submitted a petition requesti the
as at the end Of Heights Avenue and
E+s8c8L that location.NN
4. Ron C0Ckrie| 943 Century, al
regarding the parcels in south Maplewood.
5. Judith J h8 Woodl Avenue, comment
amid council
concentrate on the good of the city and all citizens.
ding |ovvSu
m[j| for their Hfh]rtS, hard work and
ve Maplewood residents tax dollars.
Of the pet
Oat she viewed 8Sdisrespect
e any personal agendas and
G. Robert St. Paul with the manner the City Manager
vv@SGpoointed and the nrooOS8Orestriction to visitor comments.
7. 8 copy Df the budget would be
made available. City Manager Copeland stated it would be available by the end of the week.
G.
1 Appointment and Natural Resources Commissioners
Mayor Longrie tabled this item due toall interviews not being completed.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Liquor License Increases and Code Rev
G. REoL Oir8Ct0r{3uiKoi|e presented the report.
b. Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following
persons were heard:
Nick Schwartz, B|eeCh8r'3 Bar, Maplewood
DVnHuot. Hu8y'sBar M8p|8vvond
Amanda Kranz, 8L8rga{8 Nightclub, Maplewood
C. Mayor LOOg[ie closed the public hearing.
City Council Meeting 11-27-O0 2
Councilmember Cave moved to adopt the following 2007 Liquor License Fee Increase and Code
bf The city has the folloNvin; of intoxicating liquor licenses:
Class A — required to maintain it least 60% annuaig 4 oss sales in non-lipor related items. Class B — required
to maintain at least 30% - ; 9? annual arosssales in non - liquor related items, Class C —establishments are
exempt from The percentage of --ross, sale, in non-liquor related sales but must ineet State Statute requirement
foi - Sundaygales. Exemption to flteserequirenienI5 (ire establi5hinetils of occupancy Ihnits cif lioorless.
These e5fablishment will be licensed as Ortss - ror licens efee purposes.
Attached is a list of the occupancy limits of our current license liolders,'
Seconded by Mayor Longrie Ayes-All
Councilmember Rossbach moved to eliminate the Class C licenses when the current establishments
cease to operate (with the exception of the exemption) at the time they cease to operate due to being a
detriment to the city by following the proper legal channels.
City Council Meeting 11-27-06
Sec. 6 Persons eligible for issuance of licenses,
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-Councilmembers Juenemann and
Rossbach
Nays-Mayor Longrie and Councilmembers
Cave and Hjelle
Councilmember Hjelle moved to directed staff and City Attorney Kantrud to research the options for
the city, and any possible conflicts with state statute in controlling, guiding and dealing with those
establishments that fall under a Class C Liquor License.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-Mayor Longrie and Councilmembers
Hjelle, Juenemann and Rossbach
Nav-Councilmember Cave
Pj Sign Variance — Boca Chica Taco House (1706 White Bear Avenue)
a. Planner Finwall presented the report.
b. Mayor Longrie opened the public hearing,
persons were heard:
None
C. Mayor Longrie closed the pub
Councilmember Rossbach moved to dei
based on the findings in the staff report.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Hielle moved to aDDrovi
J&
anager uopeiancl wiii ensun
ded by Councilmember Hjel
IRMa,",
Wlaw
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda item 4.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All
Councilmember Hjelle moved to approve consent agenda item 5.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
City Council Meeting 11-27-06
Awe
for pro
Ayes-All
or op
receives the delineation of City Attorney Bethel's invoices.
Ayes-All
4
Mayor Longhe moved to aggrove consent agenda item 6 with soecial thanks to Lieutenant Shortreed
and Corrine Ivy and Jeffery Morris from the 3M Company.
Seconded bvCounCi|mernberHdb+ U
CounCi|nnennb8r[|ave moved to approve consent agenda items 7 with special thanks to Deputy Chief
Banick and Nancy Sabin, Executive Director of the Jacob Wetterling- Foundation.
Seconded b Councilmember Juenemann Ayes
Mayor Longrie moved to approve consent agencla items 9-12 and record the applicable documents
which should include the notice address for the Board of Water Commissioners) with the ar)r)ror)riat
office at Ramsey County.
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All
1 . Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
114.133.83 Checks #71
dated 11/06/06 thru 11/14/06
263, 180.58
dated 11/21/06
4,104,423.23 Disbursements via debits to checking 8cCOunt
4,718,842.19 Total Accounts Payable
ROLL
Payroll Checks d Direct Deposits dated
516,222.62 11/17/06
Payroll Ded cb0ndl8ck#1O0O5U7LhnJ#
1000508
dated 11/17/06
518.527.87 Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 5
2. Increase in Planning Fees (Second Reading)
Moved to adopt the following second reading of the planning fees with the direction to staff to
determine an inflation rate to apply consistently:
Section 1. Section 36 26t0 0f the Zoning Code Of the City of
Section 36 26 to Fees. The follow nonrefundable
Zone Change
Conditional Use Permit:
Other
Conditional Use Permit Revi
Fl1.R1R,R18,R2,
Other
Variance
Other
Front Yard Setbacl
Other
Fee per |0tCre
is hereby amended as follows:
fees sh
mt
Home Occupation Permit (initial permit)
UU| permit
Annual permit
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Code Amendment
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Pn3|i[niD8ry [z|8t Revision or Time Extension
Final Plat
Time Extensions/Renewals
997
1.317
922
1.107
869
1,145
371
IN
MUM
873
1/481
909
3,003
1.754
237
407
149
6CityCouncilMeeting11-27-06
Section 2. Section 36 258 to Of the sign code i3 amended @afollows:
Section 36 2459 tn44-773. Fees.
1) The sign erection permit fee shall be
per
inspection
3. Conditional Use Permit Review Jiffy L (3071 White Bear Avenue)
Moved to approve the conditional use permit for Jiffy Lube automobile maintenance program at
3071 White Bear Avenue (near Maplewood Mail) again only if a problem arises or if the owner
proposes a major change to the site.
4. Conditional Use Permit Review - Saint Paul Hmong Alliance Church (1770 McMenemy Street)
Moved to approve the conditional use permit for the ST. Paul Hmong Alliance Church at 1770
xxcvennnny Street again only na problem arises or if the owners propose a major change oothe
5. Conditional UReview—Maple Center C2475.2485 and 24g5
Maplewood Drive)
yN0v8d to review the conditional uS8p8rm Maple Leaf Ridge business Center iOone
y88[
8 Donation Feedback Sign
Accepted the $6,150 donation from 3M for driver feedback signs.
Target Corporation bJ help defer the costs Of the October 2nm
ng Children from Sexual Offenders seminar.
8. Metro Gang Strike Force Joint Powers Agreement
Approved to enter intO8 Joint Powers Agreement with the Metro Gang Strike Force:
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING
THE METRO GANG STRIKE FORCE
This iS8n agreement between the political sub-divisions and municipalities
referenced in Appendix A. and (hereinafter collectively referred tO8S "the ParUes").
WHEREAS, The Parties each have law enforcement agencies (hereinafter
c0||8Ctiv8|y referred tOGS "the AnRDCiR3''\with p0|iCR powers within their respective jurisdictions
and these Agencies are responsible for the enforcement 0f all laws dealing with gang 0[related
City Council Meeting 11-27-O0 7
criminal violations in their respective jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, The Parties, through their Agencies, wish to form a joint strike force
for the purpose of more efficiently and effectively enforcing laws dealing with any and all crimes
committed by gangs or for the benefit of gangs by investigating and prosecuting such criminal
activity, especially felonies that have the likelihood of being related to gang crime; and;
NOW THEREFORE, Pursuant to the authority contained in Minnesota Statutes
471.59, commonly known as the Joint Powers Act, and §299A.641 subd-3, and in
consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and the benefits that each party shall
derive hereby, the Parties agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT
The purpose of this agreement is to establish the Metro Gang Strike Force as an
organization to coordinate efforts to prevent gang activity and investigate, apprehend
and prosecute those individuals engaged in such crimes which could be defined as gang
related or crimes committed for the benefit of a gang and to define the rights and
obligations of the Parties with respect to the duties and activities performed by the Metro
Gang Strike Force throughout the term of the agreement.
2. METRO GANG STRIKE FORCE
The Metro Gang Strike Force (hereinafter "MGSF") is hereby established by the Parties
to coordinate efforts to prevent gang activity; and investigate, apprehend and prosecute
those individuals engaged in such crimes which could be defined as gang related or
crimes committed for the benefit of a gang. Other cities, counties, and public entities
may apply for membership in the MGSF by formal application to the Gang and Drug
Oversight Council (described herein) and the Commissioner of Public Safety.
Submission of an application constitutes agreement by the applicant to all provisions set
forth in this agreement and the recommendation of at least one fulltime licensed peace
officer to the MGSF. Participation in the MGSF must be recommended by the Gang and
Drug Oversight Council and approved by the Commissioner of Public Safety.
0
The Parties and the Agencies shall cooperate and use their best efforts to ensure that
the various provisions of this Agreement are fulfilled and to undertake resolution of
disputes, if any, in good faith and in an equitable and timely manner.
4. TERM OF AGREEMENT /TERMINATION
The Initial Term of this Agreement shall be for a 12 month and three day period from
ber 29, 2005 through December 31, 2006.
4.2 This Agreement shall automatically renew each year ("Renewal Term") for up to five
years unless the MGSF Advisory Board and the Gang and Drug Oversight Council determine
adequate funding is not provided by the Minnesota Legislature and/or the Parties to this
Agreement. Notice of inadequate funding must be provided to the Parties at least sixty (60)
days prior to termination of this agreement. This Agreement will not automatically renew if a
majority of the then-current members give written notice to the other Parties of their intent to not
renew at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the then-current Initial Term or any Renewal
Term.
4.3 A member may withdraw, within the terms of this agreement, upon sixty (60) days notice
to the other Parties.
4.4 Upon withdrawal of a Party, all property of the withdrawing Party shall be returned. A
withdrawing Party shall have no claim to any property or assets owned or held by the MGSF.
City Council Meeting 11-27-06
4.5 |O the event that the K8GSFiS dissolved, all property owned bv the K8GSF shall be
distributed k} the Agencies currently participating in the K4GSF. The MGSF Board will determine
the distribution of property on 8 pro-rated basis, based upon the length of participation of
Agencies and the number of Agency officers assigned tO the K8GSF. Property Of the Agencies
Or the Parties that had been loaned for use by the K8GSF shall be returned tO the contributor.
5. K8GSF GOVERNING BOARDS
5.1 The Gang and Drug Oversight Co ci| as established by the act of the 2005 Minnesota
Legislature (Minnesota Statute §299A.641), will approve an overall budget for the Metro Gang
Strike Force and provide strategic guidance related to the investigation and prosecution of
crimes committed by a gang or for the benefit of a gang by the MGSF. Authority, composition
and duties of the Gang and Drug Oversight Council is established and defined in Minnesota
Statutes §299A.641.
5.2 An Advisory Board (hereinafter "Boan
Officer, or their designee, nf each p8rti[jp8{in
supervise the Metro Commander, approve th
for the work 0f the W1GSF and approve all ex1
Board will develop By-laws t0 address Board
unique tothe K8GSF.
nsisting of the Chief Law I
ncy will be established to
ction of participating OffiCE
ires of the Metro Gang St
tions and specific policies
5.3 The Board will elect 8chair and vice chair from
5.4 Each agency on the board will h
a tie vote, the vote of the chair will conti
5.5 The Board shall convene on, at
program business, and status of progra
meet more often if the chair determines
1
pleasure of the
administrative i
AU
vote. Asi
INUUMMO
its members.
cement
tand
at the inhUH8
once. The
procedures
htvwiU nJ|8. In the event of
rly basis t0 review the operations,
SF. The Board has the authority to
ration and responsibility for carrying out the operations Of the MGSF shall be
OD and command of the Metro C00Dl@DdBc The Metro Commander will work
ltn the Statewide L.00nO|nGoJr.
iC8Uon8n
iic region
11 select the Metro Commander and the Metro Commander serves at the
J. The Commander will be expected to provide effective leadership and
nation; direct officer assignments; oversee field operations, foster
00peration with other law enforcement agencies in and outside the
nd identify and facilitate necessary training for MGSF officers.
83 The Metro Commander will plan and coordinate case activities and direct investigative
activities of the MGSF based on intelligence provided by the Agencies, with priorities as
determined by the Advisory Board acting in concert with the strategy, policies and guidance
established by the Gang and Drug Oversight Council.
0/1 To protect the integrity of investigations and to ensure that the goals, operations 8nd
objectives of the K8GSF are properly n8pr8S8nL8d; r8qU8SLS for information by the media will be
handled bv the Metro Commander 0[ their specific designee iD accordance with @ media policy
established by the Board.
City Council Meeting 11-27-06
7. FUNDING
7.1 K8GSF operational requirements, tV include sworn personnel and necessary equipment,
will b8 funded first tO the extent possible, bv grants @S authorized bv the Commissioner Of
Public Safety upon recommendation of the Gang and Drug Oversight Council, and by any other
funding sources recognized by state 8t8iUL8 or received by any of the nnennbenS or Agencies on
behalf 0f the MGSF.
7.2 All assets received through a8izur8, forfeiture, restitution 0r fines that are derived from
the operation of the MGSF will remain the property of the Strike Force and will be used for the
furtherance of MGSF efforts. In cases where the MGSF cooperates with another jurisdiction,
such as another task force or local state or federal agency, the Metro Commander and
representatives of other agencies will negotiate a split based upon the amount of effort
expended in the investigation and will document their agreement, In the case of federal
forfeiture actions, established federal rules shall be followed. Policies regarding the collection,
reporting, use and disbursement of all MGSF assets referenced above, will be dictated by the
Board subject to compliance with applicable laws.
7.3 Participating agencies agree to individually assume any of their remaining Agency
funding deficits incurred by the assignment of their Agency personnel or equipment to the
MGSF, provided that nothing herein precludes any Agency from contributing funds, equipment,
or in-kind services in excess of that necessary to fund its own deficit. Grants funds allocated to
each Agency may be used to cover salary, overtime and vehicle costs.
7.4 The Advisory Board shall select a
the responsibility of serving as the depos
budgeted services and supplies, as appr(
keeping all financial records and filing rec
Fiscal Agent shall be responsible for stric
reporting of all receipts and disbursemen
of all receipts and expenditures and currE
the books, records and reports shall be o
fiscal agent. The Fiscal Agent shall be charged with
tory for MGSF funds, procuring and paying for
lved by the Metro Gang Strike Force Advisory Board,
uired reports in connection with grant funding. The
accountability of all MGSF funds, and for the
s. The Board shall receive a quarterly financial report
nt fund balances from the Fiscal Agent. In addition,
en to inspection by the Agencies at all reasonable
8. IVIGSF
81 The Parties shall recommend licensed peace officers orqualified federal law
enforcement and other personnel tO the K8(3SF@S agreed upon tOcarry
out its purpose responsibilities under this Agreement. Off must be
approved by the . 0~
8.2 All personnel assigned to the MGSF ("MGSF Personnel") shall remain employees of the
agency assigning the personnel and shall not be considered temporary or permanent
employees of any of the other Parties or the MGSF for any purpose whatsoever or be entitled to
tenure rights or any rights or benefits by way of workers compensation, re-employment
insurance, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, severance pay, PERA or any
other right or benefit of another of the Parties. The Parties acknowledge their individual
responsibility to provide all salary compensation and fringe benefits to their employees while
performing services on behalf of the MGSF. Benefits may include, but are not limited to, health
care, disability insurance, life insurance, re-employment insurance, FICA K8edicare, PER/\
vacation, sick leave, and unpaid leave of absences.
8.3 Parties assi p8Gu80ffiC8rS8SK8GSFP8rS0nn8|muStprovide8@Chpe8c8offiC8r
with a vehicle and equipment necessary to perform required police functions.
8'4 As directed by the W1etn} Commander, MGSF Personnel will be responsible for gang or
gang prevention activities; directed patrol; and investigations; including intelligence
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 10
QD@D@aeD1eDt, case development, and the presenting Of cases for charging t0 the appropriate
prOS8CuUDg auUl0ih/. W1GSF Personnel may also assist other law enforcement agencies iO
surveillance and undercover operations. K8GGF Personnel will work cooperatively with assisting
agencies.
8.5 As authorized by Minnesota Statute §209A.641 subd. 6 law enforcement officers
participating in the MGSF have statewide jurisdiction U] conduct criminal investigations and
have the same powers of arrest as those possessed by a sheriff.
8.6 All MGSF Personnel shall follow rules of conduct and operational guidance developed
by the Gang and Drug Oversight Council and any policies and procedures adopted by the
Board. Where Agency rules, regulations and policies of the Parties conflict with those
established by the MGSF, the Board will be notified and a resolution will be negotiated between
the MGSF and the affected Agency.
8.7 The Metro Commander or a designee shall refer disciplinary matters involving MGSF
Personnel to the person's originating agency for investigation and disposition unless, based on
the judgment of the Metro Commander, or his/her designee, a particular matter represents
probable cause for the issuance of a criminal complaint, in which case the matter shall be
referred directly to an external law enforcement agency for investigation, provided the person's
agency head is notified in advance thereof. The Metro Commander may exclude contributed
members from further involvement in the MGSF subject to review by the Board and approval of
the contributing agency.
0' LOCATION
K8GSF@CLivUUes shall take
with the concurrence Of the Gang an(
10' ADVISOR
The Board shall designate an
k} the K4GSF as and wif reauired.
ntral location to be agreed to by the Agencies and
Oversight Council.
ey to advise the Board and provide civil legal advice
11. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Disputes between MGSF personnel that
referred to the Metro Commander, whos
51
be resolved among MGSF Personnel shall b8
n shall be final.
121 Liability coverage. MGSF will maintain liability coverage with the League of Minnesota
Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) with a limit of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, under
standard LMCIT liability coverage forms.
Alternately, MGSF may maintain equivalent private liability insurance coverage. Such coverage
may be provided through separate policies for commercial general liability (CGL), public
officials' errors and omissions, and law enforcement liability. All liability insurance policies must
Each policy shall have 8 limit 0f8i least $1 million per occurrence. K the policy c0Dt8iDS
8 general aggregate limit, the general aggregate limit shall b8 not less than $7,000.0O0.
0 Th8CGLiOSungnC8Sh@UC0v8r|i@bi|itv8hSiOgfR}[DpnBDliS8S,0pg[Gtk}OS,iDd8p8Dd8Ot
contractors, products-completed operations, personal injury @nd8dvedi8inginjury, and
contn3{tV@||y'@s8Unn8d liability.
w Each Party, and each Party's officers, employees, and volunteers, shall be named 8s
additional covered parties on each policy.
12.2 Auto coverage. K8GSF shall maintain automobile liability coverage with a limit of not less
than $1,000,000 each accident. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, the
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 11
general aggregate limit shall be not less than $2,000,000. The insurance shall cover liability
arising out of any auto, including owned, hired, and non-owned autos. Each Party, and each
Party's officers, employees, and volunteers, shall be named as additional covered parties on the
policy.
12.3 Property coverage. MGSF will maintain all risk property coverage for full replacement
value on property owned by MSGF. The insurer shall waive subrogation against any Party.
12.4 Workers compensation. If MGSF at any time hires employees, MGSF will immediately
acquire and maintain workers compensation coverage.
13. INDEMNIFICATION AND WAIVER
13.1 MGSF waives any claim against any Party for damage to MGSF's property or injury o
MGSF's employees, even if that damage or injury was caused by the negligence of the Party or
the Party's officers, employees, or volunteers.
Each Party waives any claim against MGSF or against any other Party for damage to the
Party's property or injury to the Party's employees, even if that damage or injury was caused by
the negligence of the other Party or the Party's officers, employees, or volunteers.
13.2 MGSF will defend and indemnify any Party against any claims brought or actions filed
against the Party or their respective officers, employees, or volunteers, for injury to, death of, or
damage to the property of any other person or persons, arising from decisions of the MGSF
Board or from any operations for which MGSF is responsible. Any Party, officer, employee or
volunteer subject to such claim shall provide complete disclosure and cooperation in the
defense of the claim.
13.3 In the event that the total liability of the MGSF, its Parties, and their officers, employees,
and volunteers for claims arising from the activities of the Task Force should exceed the
coverage limit or in the event of liability that is not covered by the MGSF's coverage, the parties
agree to share that excess or uncovered liability equally; but this does not include the liability of
any individual officer, employee, or volunteer which arises from his or her own malfeasance,
willful neglect of duty, or bad faith.
Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as a waiver by the MGSF or by any Party of any
applicable liability limit, immunity, or defense. This expressly includes the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and any other applicable state or federal statute or case law
It is understood and agreed that each Party's liability shall be limited by the provisions of
Minnesota Statute Ch. 466 (Tort Liability, Political Subdivisions) or other applicable law. In the
event of any claims or actions filed against the MGSF and/or any individual Party for any
operations for which the MGSF is responsible, nothing in this agreement shall be construed to
allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate statutory liability caps from the MGSF
and/or individual Parties. The MGSF is intended as a separate liability entity which limits the
liability of individual Parties.
14. NOTICE
Any notice to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be made by personal delivery or
by first class mail to the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of each participating agency.
15. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Joint Powers Agreement will become effective upon the date of execution of a participating
Agency by their duly authorized official, but in no event prior to December 29, 2005.
16. ADDITION AND REMOVAL OF PARTIES LISTED IN APPENDIX A
Appendix A to this Agreement lists the Parties and contains signatures of representatives of
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 12
each Party. Appendix A may b8 amended bv the Board, upon recommendation Of the Gang
and Drug Oversight Council and approval of the Commissioner of Public Safety, without
additional signatures by representatives CU the Parties. Amendments k) Appendix A may be
made only to add additional parties or remove withdrawing parties.
6%
10
11
12.
N WITNESS THEREOF, the parties listed iO Appendix Ak} this Agreement, bv action Oftheir
governing bodies, or their authorized designees, hav8c8UsedLhiSAorH8nlerttOb8HxeCVtedin
accordance with the authority of Minnesota Statute §471.59.
T0utlaOd Auto Dealers /LexUSOfMapl8w0Od\. City Project 05-13 Board OfWater
Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul Private Water Main Agreement
Approved the private water main agreement between Bloomer Properties, LLC, the City of
Maplewood and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul. This agreement
should be recorded with Ramsey County and include the notice address for the Board of Water
Tr0Utk3Od/\Ut0 O8@|RrS (Bloomer Properties),
CODlDliS3iOOerS of the City of Saint P8U| Private VV8te[ Main Ann8eDleDt
Approved the private water main agreement between Bloomer Properties, LLC, the City of
Maplewood and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul. This agreement
should be recorded with Ramsey County and include the notice address for the Board of Water
Maplewood Retail Center, City Board of Water Commissioners Ofthe
City of Saint Paul Private Water Main Agreement
Approved the private water main agreement between Troutland, LLC, the City of Maplewood
and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul. This agreement should be
recorded with Ramsey County and include the notice address for the Board of Water
ottagewood, City Project 06-08, Approve Board of Water CO[DD1iSSODgrS of the City Of Saint
Paul Private Water Main Aareement
Approved the private water main agreement between Lauren & Company Development, ,
the City of Maplewood and the Board of Water Commissioners of the City of Saint Paul. This
agreement should be recorded with Ramsey County and include the notice address for the
Board of Water Commissioners.
13. Authorization to Purchase 2007 AutoCAD Software Upgrades
Authorized the purchase of the AutoCAD 2007 software upgrades for $5,856.
14. Resolution for Adoption of 2007 Public Works Permit Fees
Adopted the following resolution approving the 2007 Public Works permit fees.
RESOLUTION 06-11-141
ADOPTION OF THE 2007 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT FEES
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has established permit fees for sewer service construction,
storm sewer and sanitary sewer main construction, driveway construction, water connection and
grading, and
WHEREAS, city staff has reviewed the permit fees and prepared 8schedule of fees titled 2007
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 13
Public Works Permit Fees, dated November 15 1h .2006.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that:
The updated public works fees are approved for all related permit applications received
after January 1, 2007.
2. The rates shown will be reviewed by staff on an annual basis with recommendations for
14CityCouncilMeeting11-27-06
K.
15. Consider Approval of 2007 SCORE Funding Grant Application
Approved the 2007 SCORE Funding Grant Application.
AWARD OF BIDS
None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Manufactured Home Park Closing Update — Saint Paul Tourist
a. Senior Planner Ekstrand presented the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to take the $3,000 averaq
residence located at 948 Frost Avenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-f
Cave,
Nay-C
9:25 p.m. A 10 minute break was taken.
2. Conditional Use Permit Review — Maplew(
a. Planner Finwall presented the rep(
b. The following persons were heard:
940 Frost Avenue East)
it Longrie, Councilmembers
e and Juenemann
ilmember Rossbach
1616 Gervais Avenue)
Cindy Hall, 1596 Grandview Avenue, Maplewood
Patrick Lensing. Steiner Develowent
Councilmember Hielle
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All
3. Environmental Utility Fund — Report on Fund Balance and Establishing 2007 Rates
a. Public Works Director Ahl presented the report.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve an increase in the environmental utility rate by
20% effective January 1, 2007 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 2007 bud-get.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-Councilmembers Hielle, Juenemann
and Rossbach
Ayes-Mayor Longrie and Councilmember
Cave
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 15
4. Trunk Highway 5 - 120 MnDOT Property Usage Study, City Project 03-20, Resolution
Authorizing Investigation into Acquisition of Property
a. City Engineer Ahl presented the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution authorizing the Director of
Public Works to investigate the acquisition/transfer of the MnDOT property at TH 5 and TH 120.
RESOLUTION 06-11-142
AUTHORIZING INVESTIGATION INTO ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY
WHEREAS, pursuant to direction of the council adopted October 23rd, 2006, a study is
underway on the possible development of an environmental complex on the vacant MnDOT property at
Trunk Highways 120 and 5, Project 03-20, and said study is due to the council in October 2007, and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has
jurisdictional transfer and/or acquisition of said propE
WHEREAS, the City has previously rece
this site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
MINNESOTA:
1. The Director of Public Works
investigate the possible acquisition and/or jt
of Maplewood for the purpose of protecting
2. The Director of Public Works
and/or acquisition no later than the second i
s about on-going operations at
I I IEM 0 kyl F-11 W4: 001•1
ereby authorized on behalf of the City Council to
liction transfer of said property from MnDOT to the City
public interest and welfare within the area.
port to the City Council on conditions of the transfer
meeting of the Council of March 2007.
ncilmember Rossbach Ayes-All
I Z IATITA __1
1 Saint Paul Regional Water Services Sandy Lake Site Conditional Use Permit (County Road B -
West of I - 35E)
a. Senior Planner Ekstrand presented the report.
b. Planning Commissioner Fisher presented the Planning Commission report.
C. John Blackstone, St. Paul Regional Water Services, spoke for the applicant.
Councilmember Hjelle moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditio
permit for the St. Paul Regional Water Services proposed material- storage and
crushing /recycling operation on the Sandy Lake site south of County Road B:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 06-11-143
WHEREAS, the St. Paul Regional Water Services applied for a conditional use permit to use the Sandy
Lake site as a storage and construction- materials recycling site.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(1) of the city code of ordinances requires a conditional use permit for any
public utility, public service or public building use.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located on the south side of County Road B East on the
led on the need to explore the possible
r the protection of this investigation, and
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 16
vv8St side of |Dte[St8t8 35E. The heO8| d8SC[DUOD is:
Parcel #18-29-22-12-0010: South 14O'Cf North 27O'ofE442' 68/100'. North13U'of SVV
subject to County Road Bpart ofNVV/4DfyJE SECTION 1R. TOWN 39.
RANGE 22.
Parcel #1R-2 : Subject tnAvenue; South 15'nf East 32[yofWest 1780'nfNVV
Hu. Part in James 1 Addition part nf said NVVy4, S.E.LYOfVKVKR/VVin SECTION 18, TOWN 2S.RANGE
22.
Parcel #18-29-22-24-0001: SECTION 18. TOWN 29. RANGE across N2/8DfSVV
1 /4. 185'VV.VK R/VVacross S 1 /4CfNVV1 /4. 180'VV.VK R/VVacross Y2ofNVV 18,
TOWN 29, RANGE 22.
Parcel #18-29-22-12-0009: SECTION 18, TOWN 28, RANGE 22. 1 8Cn]Ss NVV
1 /4 Cf SECTION 18 T[]VVN 28, RANGE 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On November 6, 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing and recommended
approval of this eSt The itV staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission 8Cn8nce
to speak and present written statements. The planning commission considered the
recommendation of the city staff.
2. On November 27 2000 the i
recommendations of the planning commission and those of city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th8t the city council the above-described conditional use
permit, because:
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated U]beinconformity
with the C]tv's Co[no[Rhensiv8 Plan and Code [fOrdinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not d values.
The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person
or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other
5. The use would generate only rniOinlG| vehicular traffic on koC8| streets and vvOu|d not create
traffic congestion 0r unsafe access on existing Or proposed streets.
8. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and
fire pn3tRCti0D. dn3iO8gg structures, water and sewer systems, SchOO|S and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities 0rservices.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
S. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 17
Approval iS subject tO the following conditions:
1 The applicant shall comply with the site plan date-stamped October 8,2OO8. All construction
shall follow that approved site plan. The director Cf community development may approve minor
changes.
2. The construction Vf the bins and paving Cf the driveway apron must b8 substantially started
within two years of council approval Vr the permit shall become null and void.
3. The i i| shall review this i in If the |i
started this project by that time, the city council may renew this permit.
Th- - rr '--n- -- -- — ------'-- r —n — the approval
Regions Watershed District showing how they will prevent any erosion and sediment from
leaving the site. This plan shall also include the restoration of the rip-rapped areas of the slope
down to the pond and detail the construction of a paved driveway apron from County Road B
back 50 feet into the site along both branches of the driveway.
The annual materials-crushing operation _shall
evaluate whether there were any problems or nuisances caused by this activity, The city
council may prohibit any subsequent hi complaints occur. The
crushing operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
6. The applicant must keep the site watered to control the dust.
7 AJ|SPRVVS vehicles shall enter and leave the site, via the
from Rice Street.
8. If there are complaints concerning the hauling or crushing
complaining shall attempt to resolve the problems via Dis
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-All
B driveway, to the west
rations, the applicant and those
I
ed by Mayor Longrie Ayes-All
Conditional Use Permit Review - Midwest Grounds Maintenance (1949 Atlantic Street)
a. Planner Finwall presented the report.
b. The applicant and property owner Farid Atiyeh was present for council questions.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the conditional use permits for Midwest C
Maintenance Comr)anv (1949 Atlantic Street) and review aaain in November of 2008 to E
Seconded by COuOCi|D)8[nbR[R0SSb8Ch Ayes-All
M. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Longrie moved to adjourn at 11:30 p.m.
9
City Council Meeting 11-27-06 18
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
5:00 P.M. Thursday, November 30, 2006
Continuation of the November 27, 2006 Meeting
Council Chambers, City Hall
Continuation of Meeting No. 06-30
4 M 119X91 V
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambe
5:00 P.M. by Mayor Longrie.
B. ROLL CALL
Diana Longrie, Mayor
Rebecca Cave Councilmember
Erik Hjelle, Councilmember
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Will Rossbach, Councilmember
UNFINISHED BUSINESS (from 11-27-06
Council interviewed the remaining two app
Commission in the followina order:
Joh
in
L. NEW BUSINESS
3. Woodlands
a. City
City
I
Agenda Item E5
11, and was called to order at
for the Environmental and Natural Resources
Revisions to the Public Street Entrance at
Ahl presented the report.
Councilmember Hjelle moved to approve the reconstruction of the public street, Sophia Str
r)er the plan to provide snow storacie. The developer provide an as-built survey between t
trail that was constructed and the private drive to the east so staff can determine the feasit
of completing the trail connection.
4. CarMax/Mogren Area Improvements, City Project 06-17, Resolution Receiving Preliminary
Report and Calling Public Hearing for December 18, 2006
a. Public Works Director AM presented the report.
Councilmember Hjelle moved to adopt the following resolution accepting the feasibility study
including a traffic impact analysis and calling for a public hearing for December 18, 2006 at
7:00 p.m. for the CarMax/Mogren Addition, City Proiect 06-14:
11-30-06 City Council Meeting (continuation of 11-27-06 meeting)
nd@keE
RESOLUTION 0@1-144 -
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to reso of the council adopted June 12th, 2006, a report has been
prepared by the K]nn|ey - N0[n and /\SS0Ci8tSS, Inc. under the city engineer's di[8Ct0D with reference to
the improvement Of the C8rM8x/K80gr8n Addition Improvements, City Project O0-1Y,8ndLhiGr8portvv8s
received bythe council on November 2Y.2000.and
VVHEREAS, the report provides informat regarding whether the d project is
necessary, cost-8fhe{tive. and feasible,
01 INNI. Wei a AT FA a
1 . The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report
and the assessment 0f abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $4,416,000.
2. A public hearing shall be held Un such
December, 2O00iD the council chambers Of city hall 8
published notice 0f such hearing and improvement GS
Seconded by Councilmember Cave 0
8vv
n8nt[mthe 18 day of
e clerk shall aive mailed and
5. 1
Project Survey
Mayor Longrie moved to table this item to the December 18, 2006 City Council meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Hjelle Ayes-All
8. Proposed Policy Amendment to Section Seven Uf the Rules Vf Procedure for City Council and
CUv Meetinqs
we
Seconded by Councilmember Cave Ayes-Mayor Longrie, Councilmembers Cave
and Rossbach
Juenemann
Mayor Longrie moved to appoint the following candidates to the Environmental and Natural
Resources Commission:
m James Beardsley
Margaret Behrens
Carole Lynne
John Mason
Tom K80ibi
Carol Sherrill
m GinnyYing|inQ
11-30-U0 City Council Meeting (continuation Vf11-27-U0meeting) 2
Seconded by Councilmember Cave
Agenda Item E5
Ayes-Mayor Longne, Councilmembers
Cave, Hjelle and Juenemann
Nay - Councilmember Rossbach
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Garbage Collection
Councilmember Cave requested Environmental Manager Konewko evaluate the progress
of the City of Oakdale's garbage collection (who conducted a year long study) to help determine
the pros and cons of using one garbage collector throughout the city.
2. 2006 Election
Councilmember Juenemann thanked the City Clerk staff, Election Judges and all
contributing city departments for all of their hard work during the 2006 election cycle.
3. Electric Franchise Tax
Councilmember Rossbach moved to direct staff to cease efforts to implement the increase in
the Electric Franchise Tax.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Rossbach moved to set aside the rules of order to consider
motion.
Motion died for lack of a second.
This item will be included on the December 11, 2006 City Council agenda.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
Kir%nn
A*
5:35 p.
11-30-06 City Council Meeting (continuation of 11-27-06 meeting)
Agenda Item G1
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Resignation
DATE: November 21.2OU8
Jim K8Czn]vvski has resigned from the planning DVrnrnisSiVn. | have attached his e-mail
message with his resignation and a resolution of appreciation for him.
COMMISSION ACTION
n November 20.2000, the planning commission recommended approval [f the attached
ne9o|UU0n.
Approve the resolution 0f appreciation on page three for Jim KoSznovv3ki
kr/p:p|anning oommi .mem
Attachments:
1. Jim Kacznowsk E-mail Notice ofResignation
2. Jim Kacznowski Resolution ofAppreciation
Page 1 of
Attachment 1
Ken Roberts
From: Kaczrowski, James Robert Ukaczrowski1 @paychex_com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 20061:03 PM
To: Ken Roberts
Subject: Planning Commission
Ken,
I want to resign from the planning commission effective 11 -8-06. 1 feel that I am currently unable to give it the time that it
deserves. I appreciate the opportunity to serve on this board and have really enjoyed this opportunity.
Thank you for everything and best of luck in the future.
Thanks,
Jim Kaczrowski
Jim Kaczrowski
Health & Benefits
651 - 365 -5460 Ext. 50441
ikaczro rt paychex.com
The information contained in this message may be privileged,
confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or any employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you. Paychex, Inc.
2
11/8/2006
2
Attachment 2
JOINT RESOL UTION OF APPRECIA TION
WHEREAS, Jim Kaezrowski has been a member of the Maplewood
Planning Commission since April II, 2005, and has served faithfully in that
capacity to the present time; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience,
insights and good judgment and
WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy, without
compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has
consistently contributed his leadership, time and effort for the benefit
of the City.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on beha f of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Tim Kaczrowski is hereby
extended our heartfelt gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service, and
we wish hire continued success in the fiaure.
Passed by the Maplewood
City Council on
Diana Longrie, Mayor
Passed by the Maplewood
Planning Commission on
Lorraine Fischer, Chairperson
Attest:
Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
3 3
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2006
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
11. ROLL CALL
Vice-Chairperson Tushar Desai
Commissioner Mary Dierich
Chairperson Lorraine Fischer
Commissioner Michael Grover
Commissioner Harland Hess
Commissioner Gary Pearson
Commissioner Dale Trippler
Commissioner Jeremy Yarwood
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present at 7:06 p.m.
Staff Present: Dave Fisher, Interim Community Development Director, Building Official
Erin Laberee, Assistant City Engineer
Ken Roberts, Planner
Lisa Kroll, Recording Secretary
V1. NEW BUSINESS
a. Resolution of Appreciation — Jim Kaczrowski
Mr. Roberts reported that Jim Kaczrowski resigned from the planning commission and that staff is
recommending adoption of the Resolution of Appreciation for his service on the planning
commission.
Commissioner Trippler moved to approve the Resolution of Appreciation for Jim Kaczrowski.
Commissioner Desai seconded. Ayes — Desai, Dierich, Fischer, Grover, Hess,
Pearson, Trippler, Yarwood
This item goes to the city council on December 11, 2006.
Eagle Scout Project
Maplewood Nature Center
Steve Dobihal from Boy Scout Troop 461- erected 12 posts along the main trail
loop at the Maplewood Nature Center. These posts mark 12 interpretive points
along the self-guiding nature trail. The post dimensions are 6" by 6", each
slanted top has a vinyl sticker with a symbol that corresponds to the trail map and
kiosk. Each post is covered with a piece of lexan to protect against vandalism.
Steve's work helped us complete a long standing goal of having a self-guiding
trail at the nature center. The project was completed by help from his troop and
other community volunteers on Saturday October 21, 2006.
AGENDA NO. H1
FA91:4 LI I BY- 10610111
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
1
Another public hearing on the proposed property taxes and budget for 2007 has been
scheduled for December 11 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. State law requires that
the final property tax levy and budget be adopted at this public hearing. The tax levy needs
to be adopted before the budget is adopted.
The first resolution attached will levy property taxes payable in 2007. The amounts
listed in the resolution will increase the tax levy by 8.7%.
The second resolution attached will adopt the 2007 Budget.
P:\WORD\AGN\07BudgetAdoptionHearing.doc
I
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES PAYABLE IN 2007
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that:
1. The following amounts of taxes be levied for 2006, payable in 2007, upon the net tax capacity in said
City of Maplewood, for the following purposes:
Operations 12,190,250
Debt Services 2,437,800
TOTAL LEVY 14,628,050
2. In addition, there is a $703,000 market value based referendum levy for 2006 payable in 2007 to
finance the debt service on the 2002 Open Space Refunding Bonds and the 2000 Fire Safety Bonds.
3. The next tax capacity based levy of $2,437,800 for Debt Service and the market value based
referendum levy of $703,000 total $3,140,800. This is a net decrease of $921,072.79 in the scheduled
Levy of $4,061,872.79. The breakdown by Debt Service Fund is attached as Exhibit A.
PARNANCEMORMAGMAdoptBud 07.doc
Exhibit
TOTALS 4,061,872.79 3,140,800.00
05-Dec-06
p:\ExoeuBuowmuxDEBTeERvCcTAxLEvY
SCHEDULED ADOPTED INCREASE
LEVY LEVY
334 CD.REFUNDING BONDS -1Q08B 116.327D0 133.07080 18.743.00
335 CD.IMPROVEMENT BONDS -10QQA 57.086.00 60.600.00 11.614.00
337 G.O.FIRE SAFETY BONDS '2000A 314,428.00 317.400.00 2.072.00
338 G.O.EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES '20O1A 0.00 0.880.00 0.880.00
330 GD.IMPROVEMENT BONDS -20O1B 175.744.40 174.600.00 1.144.40)
340 GD.IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS -2O01C 32.760.00 32.760.00)
341 GD.IMPROVEMENT BONDS '20O2A 245.201.00 209.900.00 24.689.00
342 GD.IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS -2O02B 518.714.00 520.000.00 7.286.00
343 GD.TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS -2OO2C 629.331.00 338.90080 280.431.00)
344 GD.OPEN SPACE REFUNDING BONDS -2OO2D 406.941.00 385.60080 21.341.00)
345 G.O.IMPROVEMENT BONDS -2003A 103.515.00 105.100.00 1.585.00
347 G.O.REFUNDING BONDS -2O04A 10.647.08 10.847.08)
348 GD.IMPROVEMENT BONDS -20O4B 318 318.027.45)
340 GD.TAX ABATEMENT BONDS -2OO4C 208 185.270.00 23.517.00)
350 G.O.CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS '2O04[53.90500 50.800.00 3.105.00)
352 G.O.TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS '2O04F 100.878.85 188.700.00 27.820.05
353 CD.IMPROVEMENT BONDS -20U5A 57.043.00 57.043.00)
354 CD.IMPROVEMENT BONDS -20U8A 450.226.43 267.59080 182.636.43)
355 G.O.EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES '2000B 135.408.88 00.300.00 75.018.88)
TOTALS 4,061,872.79 3,140,800.00
05-Dec-06
p:\ExoeuBuowmuxDEBTeERvCcTAxLEvY
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
M
INTRODUCTION
It is proposed that ambulance rates be increased effective January 1, 2007 to provide
the anticipated revenue in the 2007 Budget.
Ambulance rates have been increased annually over the past several years. Prior to
2006, rate increases had been based upon the average charged by other providers.
The attached table lists the 2006 rates charged by other providers in the area. During
preparation of the 2006 Budget, it was decided to eliminate the $378,760 property tax
subsidy for ambulance services. This resulted in rate increases between 7%-16%.
The Medicare law that became effective April 1, 2002 has caused our collection rate to
drop from 85% in 2000 to 63% in 2003. Medicare requires all ambulance providers to
accept assignment. This law change prohibits the city from collecting the balance of the
bill from the patient. The 2006 Medicare allowed rates for the city are:
Basic life support 302.28
Advanced life support 1 358.95
Advanced life support 2 519.54
Charge per mile 6.05
When the runs were analyzed in 2003, approximately 43% of our ambulance bills were
for people covered by Medicare.
Operating expenses for 2007 are projected to be $2,097,840 which is $333,430 and
18.9% higher than the 2006 budget. This includes the addition of one full-time Fire
Fighter/Paramedic and the reclassification of the Paramedic Coordinator as an EMS
Director. When the fund was established in 2005, it started out with a negative cash
balance due to the fact that the receivables were moved to the new fund but the
offsetting revenues were not. Because of this, the working capital deficit in the fund at
the end of 2005 was $407,475. If we were to begin amortizing this deficit over 5 years,
an additional $78,490 would need to be added to the 2007 revenues to accomplish this.
The additional $78,490 would cause the rate increase to be 28% which in turn will
cause our collection rate to drop even more. Deferring this deficit to future years is
recommended with the hope that the push for a change in the Medicare laws will see
some results and bring in additional revenues.
To cover the expenses in the proposed 2007 budget, the rate changes would be as
follows:
AMBULANCE RATE INCREASES
Increase
2006 2007 Amount Percent
Non - transport 335.00 410.00 75.00 22.4%
Basic life support 895.00 1,100.00 205.00 22.9
Advanced life support 1 1,170.00 1,440.00 270.00 23.1
Advanced life support 2 1,295.00 1,590.00 295.00 22.8
Charge per mile 14.10 17.30 3.20 22.7
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of the attached resolution is recommended to set the rates for 2007.
CAMy Documents\AMBULANCE 2007.DOC 2
SURVEY OF AMBULANCE RATES
PROV BASIC ALS1
2006 RATES
NOW
ALS2 TRANSPORT MILEAGE
LF Ambulance kA\754.67 892.87 1 309.00 15.00
Cottage Grove EyW8 1.081.74 1 1,528.25 288.38 13.50
Hennepin County 925UO 008 88UU 330U0 1YUU
Medical Center
He8|thEast-St. John's 700.00 1.300.00 1 0 16.00
HSo|thE@st-St. JOS8ph's 859.00 1.200.00 1.238.80 415.00 18.50
Lakeview Hospital 1.234.50 1.234.58 1,583.05 48645 13.30
Oakdale, City of 800.00 1.000.00 1 75.00 15.00
St. Paul, City of 1.014.00 1 1,085.00 240.00 11.00
White Bear Lake 372.50 505.00 025D0 115.00 9.00
Woodbury 1.133.50 1.133.50 1.353.50 275.00 13.75
Average 88549 1,099.39 1,223.95 279.31 14.21
KU8pkevv0Od $885.00 $1.170.00 $1 $335.00
A) S8nxeS Apple Valley, Lakev and Farmington
C:xwy000 m*nts\AMeULxwC*nOOr,oOC 3
RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2007 AMBULANCE RATES
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for
emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special
laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and
WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the
distance a person is transported and by type of services provided; i.e., basic or advanced life
support services as defined by Medicare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective
January 1, 2007:
Base rates:
Non-transport (treatment administered) $ 410.00
Basic life support ambulance services $1,100.00
Advanced life support ambulance services 1 $1,440.00
Advanced life support ambulance services 2 $1,590.00
Rate per mile transported $ 17.30
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge when the patient has not
been administered treatment and is not transported, when the patient is transported to the
detoxification center, or when the patient is transported in a squad car.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if more than one person is transported, the
ambulance charges will be pro-rated between the people transported.
CAMy Documents\AMBULANCE 2007,DOC 4
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 2407
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that a budget for 2007 is hereby adopted as outlined in the following summary:
Estimated Balances 01 -01 -07
Revenues
Net other increases (decreases)
Expenditures
Estimated Balances 12 -31 -07
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the department appropriations totaling $30,105,010 as listed
in the budget booklet are hereby approved for the 2007 Operating Budget.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenses for the Community Center Operations Fund
may exceed the appropriation provided that the net operating income before other revenues and expenses
excluding depreciation for 2007 is not less than $46,090.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
2007 Capital Improvements Budget:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIRE TRUCK REPLACEMENT
LEGACY VILLAGE TAX ABATEMENT DISTRICT
OPEN SPACE
PARK DEVELOPMENT
REDEVELOPMENT
TAX INCREMENT ECONOMIC DEV. DISTRICT #1 -5
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -1
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -2
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -3
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -4
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -5
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -6
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -7
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -8
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE - NO. ST. PAUL
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE - ST. PAUL
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
90,040
20
120
230
500,640
920
26,430
430
430
440
30,490
25,290
60,310
19,920
66,020
140
970
822,840
PARNANCEMORMAGMAdoptBud 07 (2)
CAPITAL DEBT
OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS SERVICE
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET TOTAL
39,721,067 1,164,774 8,855,748 49,741,589
30,973,210 1,320,580 4,969,600 37,263,390
298,380)86,570)474,260 89,310
3 822,840)6,576, 290)
40,290,887 1,575,944 7,723,318 49,590,149
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the department appropriations totaling $30,105,010 as listed
in the budget booklet are hereby approved for the 2007 Operating Budget.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenses for the Community Center Operations Fund
may exceed the appropriation provided that the net operating income before other revenues and expenses
excluding depreciation for 2007 is not less than $46,090.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
2007 Capital Improvements Budget:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIRE TRUCK REPLACEMENT
LEGACY VILLAGE TAX ABATEMENT DISTRICT
OPEN SPACE
PARK DEVELOPMENT
REDEVELOPMENT
TAX INCREMENT ECONOMIC DEV. DISTRICT #1 -5
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -1
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -2
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -3
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -4
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -5
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -6
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -7
TAX INCREMENT HOUSING DISTRICT #1 -8
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE - NO. ST. PAUL
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE - ST. PAUL
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
90,040
20
120
230
500,640
920
26,430
430
430
440
30,490
25,290
60,310
19,920
66,020
140
970
822,840
PARNANCEMORMAGMAdoptBud 07 (2)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director shall establish a budget for each
public improvement project when the Council orders the project and that the budget amounts shall be
recorded at amounts specified in the feasibility study for the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
2007 Debt Service Budget:
4,220,000 Principal
2,324,430 Interest
7,410 Paying Agent Fees
6,300 Fees for Service
12,240 Interest — Interfund loans
5,910 Investment Management
6,576,290 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for Governmental Funds are hereby
adopted for financial reporting and management control.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for all other funds are hereby adopted for
management purposes only.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts,
within a fund, shall only require the approval of the City Manager or his designee. However, City
Council approval is required for transfers from contingency accounts.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended at
the end of the fiscal year shall lapse and shall become part of the unencumbered fund balance which may
be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropriations for capital improvement projects which shall
not lapse until the project is completed or canceled by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $171,000 of the fund balance in the General Fund is
designated for contingencies.
PARNANCEMORMAGWAdoptBud 07.doc
AGENDA NO. 1 -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Finance Director
r4 L
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
406,776.06 Checks # 71410 thru # 71457
dated 11/21/06 thru 11/28/06
324,544.75 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11 /17 /06 thru 11/24/06
550,771.77 Checks # 71458 thru # 71532
dated 12/05/06
94,941.88 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 11/27/06 thru 11/30/06
1,377,034.46 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
471,782.47 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/01/06
2,305.25 Payroll Deduction check # 1000615 thru # 1000616
dated 12/01/06
474,087.72 Total Payroll
1,851,122.18 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651- 249 -2902 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if
ds
attachments
S: \CTY_CLRK\Agenda Lists and Reports 2006\Agenda Reports \12- 11 -06 \I1 Approval of Claims
11/27/2006
Check Date
t 1410
71411
71412
71413
71414
71415
71416
71417
71418
71419
71420
71421
71422
71423
71424
71425
71426
71427
71428
71429
71430
71431
71432
71433
71434
71435
71436
71437
71438
71439
71440
71441
71442
71443
71444
71445
71446
71447
71448
71449
71450
71451
1112112006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
1112812006
Vendor
03758
00585
01337
01360
01360
01360
01360
01360
01360
01360
01360
01360
02410
01190
01190
01190
01190
03335
00159
00173
02908
00460
00354
01998
01998
03619
03619
00003
03576
00487
03516
00543
03783
03597
00687
00748
01894
01894
03729
03729
00942
00942
01090
01126
01961
01175
00001
00001
00001
03326
02270
02270
01941
01254
01254
01359
03215
03398
01574
01574
01995
Check Register
City of Maplewood
RANDY COOK
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
REINHART FOODSERVICE
WELLS FARGO LEASING INC
XCELENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCELENERGY
XCELENERGY
AMERICAN ENGINEERING
PAUL BARTZ
TIM BELDEN
BRIGHT WINES.COM
CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
DOODY MECHANICAL SERVICE CO
DOODY MECHANICAL SERVICE CO
DRAIN KING INC
DRAIN KING INC
ESCROW REFUND
EUREKA RECYCLING
F.M. FRATTALONE EXC INC
ANTHONY GABRIEL
GE CAPITAL
HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD
MARY JO HOFMEISTER
HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
CAROLJAGOE
KELLY & FAW CETT PA
KELLY & FAW CETT PA
KNAAK & KANTRUD PA
KNAAK & KANTRUD PA
MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO
MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIPMENT
MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
DBA ORTIVUS NORTH AMERICA ORTIVUS INC
PALDA & SONS INC
PALDA & SONS INC
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
SHAFER CONTRACTING CO INC
SHAMROCK GROUP
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
TAC COURT SYSTEMS
Description
PROJ 05 -16 REIMB FOR DRIVEWAY
NET BILLABLE TICKETS - OCT
MULCH & NATIVE PLANTS
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
MERCH RETURNED
COPIER LEASE 11/09-12/09
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY
PROJ 05 -16 TESTING SRVS
REIMB FOR FUEL & MISC SUPPLIES
PIANO TUNING
MCC WINE TASTING EVENT
VARIOUS SIZES OF CONCRETE PIPE -
REPLACE SWITCH ON PUMP
INSTALL HOT WATER PIPE SEALS
INSTALL FLOW MAX FILTER
PROJ 05 -16 LINE INSPECTION
PROJ 05 -16 TELEVISE MAINLINE
ESCR REL M DEVINE - 1055 CO RD C EAST
RECYCLING - OCT
PROJ 02 -07 PMT #13 - CO RD D
REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS
COPIER PMT
PVC FLEX COUPLING
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10119 -1119
TREE REMOVAL
REIMB FOR MILEAGE 11116
WITHDRAWAL OF CITY BOXES FROM STORAGE
PULL BOXES FROM STORAGE
LEGAL SERVICES - OCT
PROSECUTION SERVICES - OCT
CLEAN SEWER BACKUP
CLEAN SEWER BACKUP
CANOPY
PERA LIFE INS - NOV
CELL PHONE 1119 -1218
MONTHLY UTILITIES
REIMB J JACKSON- PR #5 -16 DRIVEWAY
REFUND M NELSON - MEMBERSHIP
REFUND J MUELLER BCBS MEMBERSHIP
ASCII IMPORT & EMS SOFTWARE SUPPORT
PROJ 05 -17 GERVAIS AVE PMT #2
PROJ 02 -08 CTY RD D IMPRV PMT #8
VOLLEYBALL TROPHIES & MEDALS
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
CAR WASHES - OCT
PR 02 -07 CTY RD DIHAZELWOOD PMT #18
MERCH FOR RESALE
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
ASPHALT
REPLACE DOOR HANDLE UNIT
Amount
489.00
792.30
87.33
442.47
13.24
15.46
17.41
19.54
20.98
26.88
32.00
72.29
1,467.57
20,154.84
11,089.87
2,933.22
2,903.92
1,432.10
44.77
60.00
500.00
6,665.28
80.00
33,445.00
695.00
49.00
49.00
500.00
19,495.44
67,917.40
543.90
43.67
138.62
13.57
319.50
12.91
1,151.79
38.50
8,250.00
8,250.00
1,091.40
513.60
410.86
316.00
36.01
2,743.41
1,473.00
133.14
40.00
915.90
162,621.87
9,682.75
1,716.35
579.45
281.15
46.80
26,805.79
108.20
659.93
393.83
346.00
0a
Check Register
City of Maplewood
11/27/2006
Check Date Vendor Description Amount
71452 1112812006 01580 TSE, INC.JANITORIAL SRV 9117 -10114 990.00
71453 1112812006 03465 NANCY EVAN KAMPEN TODDLER PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR 848.00
71454 1112812006 01717 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO.REPLACE SPRINKLER HEADS 3,225.00
71455 1112812006 01750 THE WATSON CO INC MERCH FOR RESALE 328.00
71456 1112812006 01754 WEBER & TROSETH INC.FIRE EXTINGUISHERS RECHARGED 516.45
71457 1112812006 02243 WINDSOR COMPANIES INC BLOWOUT IRRIGATION SYS 115.00
48 Checks in this report.
3
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee
11/16/06
11/17/06
11/14/06
11/16/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/20/06
11/20/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/21/06
11/17/06
11/21/06
11/14/06
11122/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/20/06
11/20/06
11/20/06
11/20/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/22/06
11/22/06
11/22/06
11/22/06
11/24/06
11/24/06
MN State Treasurer
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
MN Dept of Revenue
MN Dept of Natural Resources
MN State Treasurer
U.S. Treasurer
P.E.R.A.
Orchard Trust
MN State Treasurer
MN State Treasurer
Labor Unions
MidAmerica - ING
Federal Reserve Bank
ICMA (Vantagepointe)
MN State Treasurer
WI Dept of Revenue
Pitney Bowes
MN Dept of Revenue
MN State Treasurer
ARC Administration
TOTAL
Description
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
Deferred Compensation
Sales Tax
DNR electronic licenses
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
Federal Payroll Tax
P.E.R.A.
Deferred Compensation
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
Union Dues
HRA Flex plan
Savings Bonds
RHS Plan
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
State Payroll Tax
Postage
Fuel Tax
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
DCRP & Flex plan payments
Amount
12,106.46
5,459.37
8,610.00
119.50
9,041.93
91,351.24
60,699.78
24, 053.62
18, 088.34
17, 977.26
3,152.05
2,787.17
50.00
42, 515.70
8,390.25
2,017.07
2,985.00
222.00
13,282.70
1,635.31
324, 544.75
Check Date
71458
71459
71460
71461
71462
71463
71464
71465
71466
71467
71468
71469
71470
71471
71472
71473
71474
71475
71476
71477
71478
71479
71480
71481
71482
71483
71484
71485
71486
71487
71488
71489
71490
71491
71492
71493
71494
71495
71496
71497
71498
71499
71500
71501
71502
71503
71504
71505
71506
71507
71508
71509
71510
71511
71512
71513
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
090'
01819
01190
i
03780
01830
00090
0
0
0
02914
02929
00309
00
0
00589
06
0
Iii'
008
0:
09
010
01085
i
03789
001
00001
0001
00001
000
00001
00001
00001
001
00001
0001
00001
000
00001
00001
00001
001
00001
0001
00001
000
00001
00001
00001
001
00001
00001
Check Register
City of Maplewood
MRPA
MCLEOD USA
MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT
XCELENERGY
YOCUM OIL CO.
ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES
ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC
AMERICAN RED CROSS
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC
STAN BELDE
BETHEL & ASSOCIATES, PA
BLUECROSS BLUESHIELD OF MN
CNAGLAC
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS
BEA FOIX
DAVE GRAF
MILES HAMRE
STEVEN HIEBERT
IDEACOM MID- AMERICA
IDEACOM MID - AMERICA
INSPEC
LMCIT
METLIFE SBC
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN
MN LIFE INSURANCE
NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION CO, INC
MICHAEL NYE
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
Description
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 10116 - 11115
AUTOMATED PAWN SYSTEM FEE - OCT
GAS UTILITY CHARGE
UL GAS 89 OCTANE 10% ETH
ANNUAL RADAR CERT 09105 & 11105
PANASONIC PRO DIGITAL A/V MIXER
BABYSITTER "S CLASS SUPPLIES
PATROL & BOARDING FEES 1116 - 11/15
CANINE EMERGENCY VISIT
K -9 MAINTENANCE - DEC
HR SERVICES 11115 - 11128
MONTHLY PREMIUM - DEC
LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE - DEC
TRAINING - MN/DOT ESSENTIAL SKILLS
RICOH COPIER MAINT - DEC
HOLIDAY WREATHS
KARATE INSTRUCTOR 11 /7 - 11/28
REIMB MILEAGE 11111 - 11124
K -9 MAINTENANCE - DEC
REPAIR/EXCHANGE PHONE
REPAIR/EXCHANGE PHONE
MCC LEAK INVESTIGATION
WORK COMP PREMIUM AUDIT 7105 -
MONTHLY DENTAL PREMIUM - DEC
WASTEWATER - DEC
CLEO & COMMAND ACADEMY
MONTHLY PREMIUM - DEC
PROJ 06 -10 COTTAGEWOOD PMT #1
REIMB FOR PDA PURCHASE
CHAD HERMANSON POLICE RESERVE
JOE TSCHIDA POLICE RESERVE
DAVID WINGATE POLICE RESERVE
BRANDON KING POLICE RESERVE
DAN MARTIN POLICE RESERVE
DICK HANSON POLICE RESERVE
DAN BERTHIAUME POLICE RESERVE
KEN MAUSTON POLICE RESERVE
JON MCKENZIE POLICE RESERVE
NICK CARDINAL POLICE RESERVE
KATIE RUESINK POLICE RESERVE
ANGIE HANSEN POLICE RESERVE
JUSTIN BOUGHTON POLICE RESERVE
MIKE TRESLER POLICE RESERVE
CHRIS PASIUK POLICE RESERVE
ROCKY VANDAL POLICE RESERVE
BRIANNAARNZEN POLICE RESERVE
MIKE JONES POLICE RESERVE
JASON SAGSTETTER POLICE RESERVE
JENELLE SWEENEY POLICE RESERVE
REFUND B BOYCE - ROOM RENTAL
NICHOLE GOETZKE POLICE RESERVE
CHARLIE NELSON POLICE RESERVE
JOE RYAN POLICE RESERVE
KARMA KUMLIN -DIERS POLICE
REFUND V OLSON- MEMBERSHIP
JEANNIE SEIDEL POLICE RESERVE
Amount
30.00
2,108.66
436.00
6,668.88
16,363.66
996.94
5,952.29
236.40
1,108.05
97.00
35.00
6,521.00
139,139.50
629.78
825.00
161.88
220.00
159.25
5.87
35.00
150.96
150.96
3,000.00
38,774.00
9,143.67
199,212.84
415.00
3,938.35
70,488.30
240.00
804.75
735.00
471.00
463.50
390.25
336.25
315.50
300.50
298.25
294.50
243.75
227.00
223.75
198.75
146.75
145.50
133.25
130.00
126.50
100.25
100.00
94.75
85.25
85.00
71.50
61.00
55.00
Wl
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Check Date
71514
71515
71516
71517
71518
71519
71520
71521
71522
71523
71524
71525
71526
71527
71528
71529
71530
71531
71532
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
12/0512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
1210512006
1210512006
1210512006
12/05/2006
Vendor
00001
00001
03201
03790
01387
03788
01409
01418
01418
01418
01418
01418
01418
01418
01418
01418
01430
01497
01497
00198
03792
01574
03743
00529
00529
01734
01750
01754
03791
ONE TIME VENDOR
ONE TIME VENDOR
JOHN OPHEIM
PROVIDENCE HOMES
DR. JAMES ROSSINI
HARRIET RYDEL
S.E.H.
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
SCHROEDER MILK COMPANY, INC.
SPRINGSTED INC
SPRINGSTED INC
ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
KEN STEFFENSON
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
TRAFFIC & PARKING CONTROL INC
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
WILLIAM P. WALSH
THE WATSON CO INC
WEBER & TROSETH INC.
DAVE PAXSON WORLD POPULATION
Description
DAN RICE POLICE RESERVE
REFUND P KOUBA - MEMBERSHIP
REIMB FOR VEH & MISC SUPPLIES
ESCROW RELEASE - 2198 MCMENEMY
FITNESS PROGRAM ADMIN FEE - NOV
REIMB FOR USPS & SUPPLIES
PROJ 04 -05 NPDES PHASE 11 - OCT
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
MERCH FOR RESALE
BIRTHDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES
TIF PAYMENT
REBATE CALCULATIONS 2004E
REBATE CALCULATIONS 2004D
WATER UTILITY
MUSICIAN FOR HALLOWEEN EVENT
RIVER ROCK
SPEED DISPLAY SIGN
MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM - DEC
STD PLAN 4043120 -0 -1 1 DEC
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
MERCH FOR RESALE
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS RECHARGED
SPEAKING HONORARIUM 11114
Amount
52.50
50.00
328.63
2,517.19
100.00
50.03
183.75
203.02
131.95
74.77
71.56
56.61
37.74
33.82
30.05
18.87
12,954.74
1,700.00
1,700.00
997.67
150.00
222.99
4,526.25
2,960.39
1,630.28
5,734.48
204.74
118.00
50.00
75 Checks in this report.
aoU, r r 1.1 1
A
CITY OFMAPLBW00D
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Payee Description Amount
11C24/06 11/27806 K8N Dept of Natural Resources
11/27/08 11/28/06 K4N State Treasurer
11/2008 11/2906 MN State Treasurer
11/24/00 11/28/06 US Bank VISA One Card*
11/20/00 11/30/06 MN State Treasurer
ONR electronic licenses 585.50
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 11.329.75
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 17.871.21
Purchasing card items 53.388.78
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 11.750.63
Detailed listing uf VISA purchases iaattached.
Visa Transactions 11 -11 to 11 -24 -06
Trans Date
11/18/06
11/09/06
11/13/06
11/16/06
11/09/06
11/10/06
11/11/06
11/12/06
11/14/06
11/14/06
11/15/06
11/14/06
11/14/06
11/15/06
11/16/06
11/20/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/22/06
11/10/06
11/10/06
11/13/06
11/13/06
11/13/06
11/14/06
11/14/06
11/15/06
11/16/06
11/16/06
11/16/06
11/19/06
11/20/06
11/21/06
11/11/06
11/14/06
11/23/06
11/13/06
11/14/06
11/14/06
11/17/06
11/20/06
11/20/06
11/23/06
11/15/06
11/18/06
11/20/06
11/21/06
11/22/06
11/21/06
11/12/06
11/10/06
11/13/06
11/13/06
11/14/06
11/15/06
Posting Date Merchant Name
11/20/06 FCC *FRANKLIN COVEY CLG
11/13/06 SPRINT PCS- 996 -SP IVR
11115/06 LEEANN CHIN INC #17
11/17/06 BROWNELLS INC
11/13/06 THEATRE HOUSE
11/13/06 WAL MART
11/13/06 TARGET 00011858
11/14/06 MICHAELS #2744
11/15/06 TCT *M &N INTERNATIONAL
11116/06 PAPERMART
11/17/06 MILLS FLEET FARM #27
11/15/06 GRAFIX SHOPPE
11/15/06 GRAFIX SHOPPE
11/20/06 CENTURY COLLEGE -BO
11/20/06 SHRED -IT
11/22/06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
11/22/06 GRAFIX SHOPPE
11/22/06 ARDEN SHOREVIEW AN HOSPT
11124/06 DON' PAINT & BODY SHOP
11/13/06 CYBEX - 01
11/13/06 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY
11/14/06 TRI -DIM FILTER CORP
11/14/06 CUMMINS NPOWER, LLC #100
11/14/06 IN THE SWIM - CATALOG
11/16/06 THERMO -DYNE INC
11116/06 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
11/16/06 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION
11/17/06 ROTO- ROOTER SVRCS10048
11/17/06 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
11/17/06 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC
11/20/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 PRIORTIY COURIER
11/22/06 HARMON MINNEHA #245
11/13/06 APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE
11116/06 WWW.CIRCUITCITY.COM
11/24/06 APL *APPLE ONLINE STORE
11/14/06 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
11/15/06 LITURGICAL PUB -GEN DEP
11/16/06 LUTSEN MOUNTAINS INC.
11/20/06 DEX EAST- LOCKBOX
11/21/06 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
11122/06 GAS -N- SPLASH #3
11/24/06 WEDDINGPAGES INC
11/17/06 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLU
11/20/06 PAYPAL INC
11/21/06 COMCAST CABLE COMM
11/24/06 HYDRO -FIT INC
11/24/06 GE CAPITAL
11/24/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2810
11/13/06 NAT'L EMERG.TRAINING CTR
11113/06 SERVICEMASTER PROF SVC
11/14/06 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES
11/15/06 WEBER & TROSETH INC
11/15/06 GOODIN COMPANY
11/17/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2810
Trans Amount Name
41.42 R CHARLES AHL
35.00 BRUCE K ANDERSON
95.07 BRUCE K ANDERSON
35.71 SCOTT ANDREWS
108.60 MANDY ANZALDI
5.00 MANDY ANZALDI
13.83 MANDY ANZALDI
2.23 MANDY ANZALDI
36.00 MANDY ANZALDI
39.88 MANDY ANZALDI
4.24 MANDY ANZALDI
106.50 JOHN BANICK
360.00 JOHN BANICK
50.00 JOHN BANICK
139.86 JOHN BANICK
381.64 JOHN BANICK
159.75 JOHN BANICK
219.20 JOHN BANICK
1,212.32 JOHN BANICK
35.14 JIM BEHAN
151.11 JIM BEHAN
1,038.34 JIM BEHAN
270.50 JIM BEHAN
207.90 JIM BEHAN
1,244.00 JIM BEHAN
1,060.68 JIM BEHAN
1,567.76 JIM BEHAN
542.00 JIM BEHAN
67.31 JIM BEHAN
547.00 JIM BEHAN
44.49 JIM BEHAN
11.05 JIM BEHAN
279.60 JIM BEHAN
175.94 CHAD BERGO
266.24 CHAD BERGO
155.49 CHAD BERGO
9.57 HEIDI CAREY
625.00 HEIDI CAREY
441.75 HEIDI CAREY
76.04 HEIDI CAREY
104.37 HEIDI CAREY
37.01 HEIDI CAREY
600.00 HEIDI CAREY
75.35 LINDA CROSSON
59.95 LINDA CROSSON
69.41 LINDA CROSSON
721.00 LINDA CROSSON
158.69 LINDA CROSSON
2.95 CHARLES DEAVER
93.00 ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL
1,124.64 LARRY FARR
346.25 LARRY FARR
1,702.50 LARRY FARR
310.31 LARRY FARR
12.72}LARRY FARR
Visa Transactions 11 -11 to 11 -24 -06
Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name Trans Amount Name
11/16/06 11/17/06 DEY DISTRIBUTING, INC.10.91 LARRY FARR
11/16/06 11/17/06 LESCO SC 0530 95.42 LARRY FARR
11/16/06 11120/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 61.25 LARRY FARR
11/20/06 11/21/06 INTEREUM INC 374.88 LARRY FARR
11/20/06 11/22/06 EXPRESS MESSENGER SYSTEM 27.80 LARRY FARR
11/20/06 11/22/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 30.79 LARRY FARR
11/21/06 11/22/06 ASSET RECOVERY CORP 20.81 MYCHAL FOWLDS
11/21/06 11/22/06 AVENET LLC 1,320.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS
11/21/06 11/24/06 SPRINT PCS- 995 -SP WEB 122.52 MYCHAL FOWLDS
11/22/06 11124/06 DELL MARKETING L.P.3,946.77 MYCHAL FOWLDS
11/20/06 11/22/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 8.51 NICK FRANZEN
11/22/06 11/24/06 HP DIRECT- PUBLICSECTOR 2,747.70 NICK FRANZEN
11/23/06 11/24/06 SYX *TIGERDIRECT.COM 41.98 NICK FRANZEN
11/14/06 11/15/06 TARGET 00011858 85.19 PATRICIA FRY
11/15/06 11/16/06 PAKOR INC 412.39 PATRICIA FRY
11/21/06 11/22/06 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 45.05 PATRICIA FRY
11/22/06 11/24/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 15.33 PATRICIA FRY
11/22/06 11/24/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 12.45 PATRICIA FRY
11/21/06 11124/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 229.78 JEAN GLASS
11/22/06 11/24/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 30.10}JEAN GLASS
11/16/06 11/17/06 SPRINT AQUATICS 155.72 MIKE GRAF
11/16/06 11/20/06 WISCO INDUSTRIES INC 15.00 MIKE GRAF
11/17/06 11/20/06 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS 72.53 MIKE GRAF
11/21/06 11/24/06 ARAMARK REF SVS #6013-397.53 MIKE GRAF
11/14/06 11/16/06 PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY 1 39.62 JANET M GREW HAYMAN
11/17/06 11120/06 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE 5.21 JANET M GREW HAYMAN
11/18/06 11/20/06 KOWALSKI'S WOODBURY 7.02 JANET M GREW HAYMAN
11/10/06 11/13/06 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC.50.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE
11/14/06 11/15/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO 48.83 KAREN E GUILFOILE
11/15/06 11/16/06 VZWRLSS *ETMKSMO3902101 372.74 KAREN E GUILFOILE
11/13/06 11/14/06 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 13.26 LORI HANSON
11/21/06 11/24/06 DATABAZAAR.COM 337.30 LORI HANSOM
11/22/06 11/24/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 127.47 LORI HANSOM
11/22/06 11/24/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 162.93 LORI HANSON
11/16/06 11117/06 MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L 125.14 GARY HINNENKAMP
11/16/06 11/17/06 MOGREN LANDSCAPE SUPPLY L 26.63 GARY HINNENKAMP
11/10/06 11/15/06 AMERICAN RED CROSS 68.36 RON HORWATH
11/11/06 11/13/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS 47.79 ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/13/06 11/15/06 WEBER & TROSETH INC 8.00 ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/15/06 11/16/06 ADAMS PEST CONTROL 69.23 ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/21/06 11/24/06 RAINBOW FOODS 00088526 39.05 ANN E HUTCHINSON
11/16/06 11117/06 LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE 325.00 SCOTT JACOBSON
11/10/06 11/15/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 646.23 DAVID JAHN
11/12/06 11/13/06 TARGET 00011858 34.04 KEVIN JOHNSON
11/14/06 11/16/06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 46.86 TOM KALKA
11/14/06 11/16/06 WOLF CAMERA #1530 7.87 TOM KALKA
11/15/06 11/16/06 BATTERIES PLUS 25.05 TOM KALKA
11/15/06 11/17/06 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 9.78 TOM KALKA
11/14/06 11/17/06 PARENTS AUTOMOTIVE AND 255.90 FLINT KARTS
11/16/06 11/17/06 TARGET 00011858 5.52 MARY B KOEHNEN
11/20/06 11121/06 FITNESS WHOLESALE INC 500.00 MARY B KOEHNEN
11/07/06 11/17/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 88.74 MICHAEL LIDBERG
11/13/06 11/17/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 195.73 MICHAEL LIDBERG
11/21/06 11/22/06 TARGET 00011858 184.31 ALISHA M LUKIN
11/21/06 11/22/06 WALGREEN 00016873 14.97 ALISHA M LUKIN
Visa Transactions 11 -11 to 11 -24 -06
Trans Date Posting Date Merchant Name
11/21/06 11/22/06 HALF PRICE BOOKS #036
11/21/06 11/22/06 LAKESHORE LEARNING #41
11/21/06 11124/06 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617
11/21/06 11/24/06 DOLRTREE 3150 00031500
11/21/06 11/24/06 OFFICE MAX 00002204
11/22/06 11/24/06 FEDEX KINKO'S #0617
11/11/06 11/13/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/15/06 11/16/06 DE LAGE LANDEN OP01 OF 01
11/15/06 11/16/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO
11/20/06 11121/06 AMERICAN MESSAGING RECUR
11/21/06 11/24/06 A -1 LAUNDRY
11/15/06 11/16/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO
11/15/06 11/16/06 VZW APO CCVISIONNO
11/22/06 11/24/06 UNITED RENTALS #D09
11/15/06 11/16/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/21/06 11/22/06 UNITED RENTALS #D10
11/15/06 11/16/06 LISPS 2663650009
11/16/06 11/17/06 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS
11/21/06 11124/06 RYCO SUPPLY COMPANY
11/20/06 11/21/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/15/06 11/17/06 THE HOME DEPOT 2801
11/14/06 11/15/06 U OF M CCE ON LINE
11/10/06 11/13/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/16/06 11/20/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/16/06 11/20/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/21/06 11124/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/20/06 11/21/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/14/06 11/16/06 LAMETTRY'S COLLISION 4
11/09/06 11/13/06 ROTECK COM LABELS
11/13/06 11/14/06 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
11/14/06 11/16/06 WOLF CAMERA #1530
11/16/06 11/17/06 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE
11/16/06 11/17/06 CC MILITARY SURPLUS LL
11/17/06 11/20/06 WOLF CAMERA #1530
11/20/06 11121/06 ABACUS PLUS SERVICES INC
11/21/06 11/22/06 FITZCO INC
11/21/06 11/22/06 ABACUS PLUS SERVICES INC
11/22/06 11/24/06 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
11/14/06 11/15/06 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
11/14/06 11/16/06 S & W HEALTHCARE CORP
11/20/06 11/21/06 MENARDS 3059
11/09/06 11113/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
11/10/06 11/13/06 PAM OIL INC
11/13/06 11/15/06 TOUSLEY FORD 127200039
11/15/06 11/17/06 BAUER BULT TRE33200023
11/15/06 11/17/06 BAUER BULT TRE33200023
11/16/06 11/17/06 TRUCK UTILITIES INC
11/16/06 11/20/06 COMO LOBE & SUPPLIES
11/17/06 11/20/06 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
11/17/06 11/20/06 GOPHER BEARING COMPANY IN
11/17/06 11120/06 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC
11/20/06 11/21/06 FORCE AMERICA
11/20/06 11/22/06 KATH AUTO PARTS LC
11/21/06 11/24/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
11/22/06 11/24/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
Trans Amount Name
35.66 ALISHA M LUKIN
21.25 ALISHA M LUKIN
57.81 ALISHA M LUKIN
35.15 ALISHA M LUKIN
19.14 ALISHA M LUKIN
41.54 ALISHA M LUKIN
827.88 STEVE LUKIN
379.14 STEVE LUKIN
42.80 STEVE LUKIN
17.74 STEVE LUKIN
25.56 DAN MARTIN
39.48 MARK MARUSKA
60.67 ED NADEAU
96.87 ED NADEAU
422.48 BRYAN NAGEL
100.10)BRYAN NAGEL
39.00 JEAN NELSON
71.07 JEAN NELSON
32.70 JEAN NELSON
319.52 AMY NIVEN
41.54 RICHARD NORDQ
140.00 ERICK OSWALD
34.47 MARY KAY PALA
396.97 MARY KAY PALA
23.43 MARY KAY PALA
38.29 MARY KAY PALA
21.30 KATHLEEN PECK
452.98 ROBERT PETERS
38.75 PHILIP F POWELL
12.10 PHILIP F POWELL
7.44 PHILIP F POWELL
34.06 PHILIP F POWELL
10.00 PHILIP F POWELL
8.30 PHILIP F POWELL
439.85 PHILIP F POWELL
77.20 PHILIP F POWELL
204.48 PHILIP F POWELL
255.56 PHILIP F POWELL
572.50 ROBERT PRECHT
240.00 ROBERT PRECHT
3.16 ROBERT PRECHT
84.21 STEVEN PRIEM
97.13 STEVEN PRIEM
119.09 STEVEN PRIEM
265.06 STEVEN PRIEM
445.12 STEVEN PRIEM
225.69 STEVEN PRIEM
101.18 STEVEN PRIEM
5.40 STEVEN PRIEM
10.21 STEVEN PRIEM
76.74 STEVEN PRIEM
10.65 STEVEN PRIEM
5.31 STEVEN PRIEM
10.99 STEVEN PRIEM
71.69 STEVEN PRIEM
UIST
NK
NK
NK
NK
HALL
ON
EL
EL
EL
iff
Visa Transactions 11 -11 to 11 -24 -06
Trans Date
11/22/06
11/22/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/22/06
11/10/06
11/13/06
11/20/06
11/21/06
11/09/06
11/13/06
11/15/06
11/16/06
11/21/06
11/15/06
11/21/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/22/06
11/17/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/09/06
11/13/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/21/06
11/19/06
11/15/06
11/14/06
11/10/06
11/10/06
11/10/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/17/06
11/19/06
11/23/06
11/20/06
11/22/06
11/15/06
11/16/06
11/15/06
Posting Date Merchant Name
11/24/06 KATH AUTO PARTS NSP
11/24/06 EAT INC
11122/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/22/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11124/06 SPRINT *WIRELESS SVCS
11/13/06 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN
11/15/06 MCFARLANE MEDIA
11/21/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/24/06 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC
11/13/06 MICHAELS #2744
11/15/06 OFFICE DEPOT #375
11/17/06 THE UPS STORE #1533
11/20/06 MAD SCIENCE OF MINN
11124/06 ORIENTAL TRADING CO
11/16/06 MENARDS 3059
11/22/06 UNITED RENTALS #D09
11/20/06 WHITE BEAR ACE HARDWAR
11/20/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/24/06 OFFICE DEPOT #1090
11/20/06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
11113/06 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
11/13/06 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
11/13/06 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
11/13/06 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
11/13/06 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
11/15/06 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
11/22/06 U OF M CCE ON LINE
11/22/06 U OF M CCE ON LINE
11/22/06 U OF M CCE ON LINE
11122/06 U OF M CCE ON LINE
11/21/06 OFFICE DEPOT #2592
11/16/06 DE LAGE LANDEN OP01 OF 01
11/15/06 FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE
11/15/06 ENERGY SALES INC
11/13/06 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
11/13/06 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
11120/06 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC
11/20/06 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC
11/20/06 COMCAST CABLE COMM
11/20/06 QWESTCOMM *TN651
11/24/06 QWESTCOMM *TN651
11/22/06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC
11/24/06 INT'L ASSN OF CH101 OF 01
11/16/06 INTL ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS
11/20/06 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617
11117/06 QUILL CORPORATION
Trans Amount lame
85.43 STEVEN PRIEM
88.13 STEVEN PRIEM
1 KEVIN RABBETT
532.40 KEVIN RABBETT
532.40 KEVIN RABBETT
1 KEVIN RABBETT
319.44 KEVIN RABBETT
532.40 KEVIN RABBETT
319.44 KEVIN RABBETT
175.97 KEVIN RABBETT
824.85 TERRIE RAMEAUX
TERRIE RAMEAUX
811.43 MICHAEL REILLY
8.30 UDR' ROBBINS
6.90 UDR' ROBBINS
ROBERT
ROBERT RUNNING
MES SCHINDELDECKER
65.54
18.63 DEB SCHMIDT
0 SHORTREED
207.00 ANDREA SINDT
207.00 ANDREA SINDT
333.00 ANDREA SINDT
850.00 ANDREA SINDT
207.00 ANDREA SINDT
ANDREA
300.00 ANDREA SINDT
50.00 ANDREA SINDT
225.00 SINDT
150.00 SINDT
59.62 STAPLES
626.43 J
2.65 RUSTIN SVENDSEN
373.82 LYLE SWANSON
614.50 DOUGLAS . ,
DOUGLAS ' : '
1,500.00 DOUGLAS a a
11 DOUGLAS a a
1 JUDY TETZLAFF
341.91 JUDY TETZLAFF
57.54 JUDY TETZLAFF
260.80 DAVID J THOMALLA
200.00 i' ! , '
195.00
8.50 JOSEPH WATERS
0 SUSAN
ill
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
12/01/06 CAVE, REBECCA 397.80
12101106 HJELLE, ERIK 397.80
12/01/06 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 397.80
12101106 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 397.80
12/01/06 COPELAND, EUGENE 3,090.00
12101/06 FARR, LARRY 1,912.50
12/01/06 SWANSON, LYLE 1,711.57
12101106 ARNOLD, AJLA 672.00
12/01 /06 RAMEAUX, THERESE 2,670.96
12101106 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 1,647.75
12/01/06 ANDERSON, CAROLE 974.57
12101106 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,898.35
12/01/06 DEBILZAN, JUDY 720.00
12/01106 JACKSON, MARY 1,87335
12/01/06 KELSEY, CONNIE 1,054.58
12/01106 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,924.74
12101x`06 FRY, PATRICIA 1,738.95
12101106 GUILFOILE, KAREN 3,094.70
12/01/06 MORSON, JOHN 383.04
12101106 SPANGLER, EDNA 713.97
12/01/06 ANDERSON, SUZANNE 585.00
12101/06 JAGOE, CAROL 1,679.66
12/01/06 KELLY, LISA 1,027.98
12101106 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,012.73
12/01/06 MOY, PAMELA 880.81
12101106 OLSON, SANDRA 1,28817
12/01/06 OSTER, ANDREA 1,804.71
12101106 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,839.76
12/01/06 BANICK, JOHN 4,017.82
12/01106 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,67735
12/01/06 POWELL, PHILIP 2,394.54
12/01106 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,684.28
12101x`06 THOMALLA, DAVID 4,429.00
12101106 ABEL, CLINT 2,573.01
12/01/06 ALDRIDGE, MARK 3,030.82
12101106 ANDREWS, SCOTT 3,254.39
12/01/06 BAKKE, LONN 2,560.09
12101/06 BELDE, STANLEY 3,083.47
12/01/06 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 2,422.18
12101106 BOHL, JOHN 2,895.78
12/01/06 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,400.11
12101106 COFFEY, KEVIN 2,667.44
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
12101106 GROTTY, KERRY 3,110.16
12/01/06 DOBLAR, RICHARD 4,206.79
12/01/06 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 2,217.28
12/01/06 HEINZ, STEPHEN 3,164.08
12/01/06 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,862.07
12/01/06 JOHNSON, KEVIN 3,950.35
12/01/06 KALKA, THOMAS 686.28
12/01/06 KARIS, FLINT 3,782.77
12/01/06 KONG, TOMMY 2,547.11
12/01/06 KROLL, BRETT 2,716.63
12/01/06 KVAM, DAVID 3,523.42
12/01/06 LANGNER, TODD 2,120.22
12/01/06 LARSON, DANIEL 2,400.11
12/01/06 LU, JOHNNIE 2,499.29
12/01/06 MARINO, JASON 2,400.11
12/01/06 MARTIN, DANIEL 654.68
12/01/06 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,514.38
12/01/06 MCCARTY, GLEN 2,517.11
12/01/06 METRY, ALESIA 2,635.40
12/01/06 NYE, MICHAEL 2,260.36
12/01/06 OLSON, JULIE 2,926.32
12/01/06 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,587.70
12/01/06 RHUDE, MATTHEW 1,90018
12/01/06 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,149.04
12/01/06 STEINER, JOSEPH 2,026.03
12/01/06 SYPNIEWSKI, urILLIAM 1,988.61
12/01/06 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,716.13
12/01/06 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,378.55
12/01/06 WENZEL, JAY 2,756.80
12/01 /06 XIONG, KAO 2,547.11
12/01/06 BARTZ, PAUL 3,015.84
12/01/06 BERGERON, JOSEPH 3,498.79
12/01/06 DUGAS, MICHAEL 2,514.38
12/01/06 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,641.80
12/01/06 FLOR, TIMOTHY 4,226.51
12/01/06 FRASER, JOHN 2,761.68
12/01/06 LANGNER, SCOTT 2,445.82
12/01/06 PALMA, STEVEN 2,870.46
12/01/06 THEISEN, PAUL 2,921.92
12/01/06 THIENES, PAUL 2,628.65
12/01/06 BARTA, JEREMY 2,865.37
12/01/06 DAWSON, RICHARD 3,408.44
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
12101106 DUELLMAN, KIRK 3,526.37
12/01/06 EVERSON, PAUL 3,471.08
12/01/06 HALWEG, JODI 2,899.86
12/01/06 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 3,267.31
12/01/06 NOVAK, JEROME 3,613.72
12/01/06 PARSONS, KURT 3,165.21
12/01/06 PETERSON, ROBERT 3,556.65
12/01/06 PRECHTEL, ROBERT 3,665.18
12/01/06 SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,576.89
12/01/06 GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 2,868.34
12/01/06 BAUER, MICHELLE 2,645.19
12/01/06 BURAU, JAMES 1,681.63
12/01/06 FLAUGHER, JAYME 2,963.31
12/01/06 HERMANSON, CHAD 2,259.95
12/01/06 HUBIN, KENNARD 2,717.08
12/01/06 KNAPP, BRETT 2,772.15
12/01/06 LINN, BRYAN 2,910.27
12/01/06 PACOLT, MARSHA 2,529.68
12/01/06 RABINE, JANET 2,478.71
12/01/06 STAHNKE, JULIE 2,493.11
12/01/06 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,016.18
12/01/06 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 1,656.57
12/01/06 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,81335
12/01/06 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 293.39
12/01/06 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,675.69
12/01/06 KNUTSON, LOIS 1,570.95
12/01/06 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 3,059.51
12/01/06 NIVEN, AMY 1,258.02
12/01/06 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,601.27
12/01/06 BRINK, TROY 1,826.15
12/01/06 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1,92535
12/01/06 EDGE, DOUGLAS 2,183.58
12/01/06 FREBERG, RONALD 1,932.28
12/01/06 JONES, DONALD 2,209.54
12/01/06 MEYER GERALD 1,969.79
12/01/06 NAGEL, BRYAN 2,486.01
12/01/06 OSWALD, ERICK 2,080.46
12/01/06 RUNNING, ROBERT 1,973.25
12/01/06 TEVLIN, TODD 1,84615
12/01/06 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,414.86
12/01/06 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,776.55
12/01/06 ISAKSON, CHAD 239.59
1111
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
12101106 JACOBSON, SCOTT 1,529.35
12/01/06 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,030.15
12/01/06 KUMMER, STEVEN 2,338.17
12/01/06 LABEREE, ERIN 2,882.35
12/01/06 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,414.86
12/01/06 MEINHOLZ, WILLIAM 98.56
12/01/06 PECK, DENNIS 2,421.79
12/01/06 SCHREMPP, ANTHONY 121.40
12/01/06 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 2,129.35
12/01/06 ANDERSON, BRUCE 4,359.27
12/01/06 CAREY, HEIDI 2,179.78
12/01/06 HALL, KATHLEEN 1,820.30
12/01/06 MARUSKA, MARK 2,754.63
12/01/06 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,905.40
12/01/06 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,895.66
12/01/06 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,584.38
12/01/06 DEAVER, CHARLES 249.48
12/01/06 GERNES, CAROLE 149.25
12/01/06 HAYMAN, JANET 1,22897
12/01/06 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,330.27
12/01/06 NELSON, JEAN 1,029.42
12 /01 /06 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 2,060.55
12/01/06 HAMRE, MILES 375.00
12/01/06 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,244.09
12/01/06 KROLL, LISA 1,290.68
12/01/06 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,172.30
12/01/06 SINDT, ANDREA 1,74535
12/01/06 THOMPSON, DEBRA 467.04
12/01/06 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,613.35
12/01/06 FINWALL, SHANK 2,564.23
12/01/06 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,737.47
12/01/06 BRASH, JASON 1,544.57
12/01/06 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,853.51
12/01/06 FISHER, DAVID 3,712.12
12/01/06 RICE, MICHAEL 2,11095
12/01/06 SWAN, DAVID 2,214.15
12/01/06 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,256.48
12/01/06 WORK, ALICIA 182.81
12/01/06 LUKIN, ALISHA 768.00
12/01/06 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 337.50
12/01/06 ROBBINS, AUDRA 2,288.25
12/01/06 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 122.50
ip
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
12101106 STAPLES, PAULINE 3,028.24
12/01/06 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,854.34
12/01/06 UNDERHILL, KRISTEN 264.00
12/01/06 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,903.68
12/01/06 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 2,055.00
12/01/06 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,078.15
12/01/06 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,646.90
12/01/06 COLLINS, ASHLEY 57.75
12/01/06 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 244.00
12/01/06 CROSSON, LINDA 2,782.65
12/01/06 EVANS, CHRISTINE 780.48
12/01/06 GRAF, MICHAEL 2,094.61
12/01/06 HER, CHONG 535.00
12/01/06 HOFMEISTER, MARY 721.47
12/01/06 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 563.02
12/01/06 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 2,094.61
12/01/06 SCHULZE, BRIAN 1,050.84
12/01/06 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 161.00
12/01/06 BRENEMAN, NEIL 464.23
12/01/06 BRUSOE, CRISTINA 175.50
12/01/06 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 66.23
12/01/06 DUNK, RYAN 593.34
12/01/06 ERICKSON- CLARK, CAROL 47.50
12/01/06 EVANS, KRISTIN 67.85
12/01/06 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 75.00
12/01/06 FONTAINE, KIM 800.43
12/01/06 GREDVIG, ANDERS 381.09
12/01/06 HASSENSTAB, DENISE 44.70
12/01/06 HORWATH, RONALD 2,159.70
12/01 /06 KOEHNEN, AMY 78.15
12/01/06 KOEHNEN, MARY 1,512.43
12/01/06 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 408.98
12/01/06 LAMEYER, ZACHARY 8.44
12/01/06 MATHEWS, LEAH 75.83
12/01/06 PROESCH, ANDY 565.68
12/01/06 SMITH, ANN 118.20
12/01/06 TELLIN, SARAH 173.85
12/01/06 TRUE, CAROLINE 114.90
12/01/06 TUPY, 1 FIDE 169.60
12/01/06 TUPY, MARCUS 272.11
12/01/06 WERNER, REBECCA 140.23
12/01/06 WOLFGRAM, MARY 66.65
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
12101106 GROPPOLI, LINDA 292.50
12/01/06 HER, SHILLAME 61.50
12/01/06 HOLMGREN, STEPHANIE 64.75
12/01/06 STEVENS, PATTI 132.24
12/01/06 BEHAN, JAMES 1,893.79
12 /01 /06 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,392.56
12/01/06 PRINS, KELLY 1,046.82
12/01/06 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,706.95
12/01/06 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 189.85
12/01/06 AICHELE, CRAIG 1,966.47
12/01/06 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,12935
12/01/06 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 1,757.18
12/01/06 BERGO, CHAD 2,355.82
12/01/06 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 2,686.82
12/01/06 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,250.75
1000522 12/01/06 LONGRIE, DIANA 452.00
1000523 12/01/06 RYDEL, HARRIET 1,261.60
1000524 12/01/06 JAHN, DAVID 1,787.96
1000525 12/01/06 MORIN, TROY 157.25
1000526 12/01/06 MATHEYS, ALANA 2,059.18
1000527 12/01/06 HANSEN, LORI 1,871.37
1000528 12 /01 /06 PALANK, MARY 1,679.66
1000529 12/01/06 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1,855.40
1000530 12/01/06 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 3,268.81
1000531 12/01/06 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2,809.86
1000532 12/01/06 BAUMAN, ANDREW 248.00
1000533 12/01/06 BUCKLEY, BRENT 1,559.53
1000534 12/01/06 EDSON, DAVID 1,932.28
1000535 12/01/06 14ELEY, ROLAND 1,934.59
1000536 12/01/06 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,231.07
1000537 12/01/06 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,89797
1000538 12/01/06 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1,893.35
1000539 12/01/06 BERGER, STEPHANIE 378.25
1000540 12/01/06 CORBETT, CAITLIN 70.00
1000541 12/01/06 DEGREE, AMANDA 4594
1000542 12/01/06 ERICKSON, AMY 130.00
1000543 12/01/06 GREEK ABIGAIL 52.00
1000544 12/01/06 KOHLMAN, JENNIFER 64.00
1000545 12/01/06 LINDA, KELLIE 310.00
1000546 12/01/06 NETTLETON, NICOLE 117.00
1000547 12/01/06 NIELSEN, ABBY 65.00
1000548 12/01/06 NYBERG, MICHELLE 169.00
I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
1000549 12101106 ROBBINS, EMERALD 356.00
1000550 12/01/06 WILSON, KALEN 143.00
1000551 12/01/06 ZENO, KAYLA 52.00
1000552 12/01/06 HAAG, MARK 1,913.95
1000553 12/01/06 NADEAU, EDWARD 3,061.98
1000554 12 /01 /06 GLASS, JEAN 1,868.83
1000555 12/01/06 NAGEL, BROOKE 417.45
1000556 12/01/06 SIMPSON, JOSEPH 186.25
1000557 12/01/06 VELASQUEZ, ANGELA 139.50
1000558 12/01/06 ALBRECHT, TIMOTHY 76.88
1000559 12/01/06 ANDERSON, CALEB 2730
1000560 12/01/06 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 184.60
1000561 12/01/06 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 177.50
1000562 12/01/06 BENJAMIN, AYLA 58.50
1000563 12/01/06 BRENEMAN, SEAN 157.80
1000564 12/01/06 BRUSOE, AMY 82.75
1000565 12/01/06 CHASTAN, ADAM 68.25
1000566 12/01/06 CLARK, PAMELA 124.95
1000567 12/01/06 COSTA, JOSEPH 384.80
1000568 12/01/06 DEMPSEY, BETH 122.50
1000569 12/01/06 FENGER, JUSTIN 343.23
1000570 12/01/06 GIEL, NICOLE 28.00
1000571 12/01/06 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 382.25
1000572 12/01/06 HAGSTROM, EMILY 64.38
1000573 12/01/06 HERRON, ADAM 158.88
1000574 12/01/06 IRISH, PETER 192.25
1000575 12/01/06 JOHNSON, JAMES 232.83
1000576 12/01/06 KROLL, MARK 292.88
1000577 12/01/06 LEMAY, KATHERINE 92.48
1000578 12/01/06 NWANOKWALE, MORDY 87.75
1000579 12/01/06 PEHOSKI, JOEL 67.80
1000580 12/01/06 RICHTER, DANIEL 51.00
1000581 12/01/06 RICHTER, NANCY 252.50
1000582 12/01/06 RYAN, ERICA 54.60
1000583 12/01/06 SAUCERMAN, MICHAEL 299.50
1000584 12/01/06 SCHMIDT, EMILY 98.50
1000585 12/01/06 SCHMIDT, JOHN 45.50
1000586 12/01/06 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 53.90
1000587 12/01/06 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 178.56
1000588 12/01/06 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 42.25
1000589 12/01/06 SMITLEY, SHARON 377.25
1000590 12/01/06 STAHNKE, AMY 99.88
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT
1000591 12/01/06 WARNER, CAROLYN 278.65
1000592 12/01/06 WEDES, CARYL 122.50
1000593 12/01/06 WHITE, NICOLE 349.20
1000594 12/01/06 WILLIAMS, KRISTINE 72.00
1000595 12/01/06 WOODMAN, ALICE 115.00
1000596 12/01/06 ZALK, IDA 19.50
1000597 12/01/06 BOSLEY, CAROL 292.50
1000598 12/01/06 LEWIS, AMY 90.65
1000599 12/01/06 OIL, REBECCA 149.19
1000600 12/01/06 PARAYNO, GUAI 106.33
1000601 12/01/06 SATTLER, MELINDA 68.10
1000602 12/01/06 STODGHILL, AMANDA 20.25
1000603 12/01/06 VAN HALE, PAULA 58.10
1000604 12/01/06 ZAGER, LINNEA 159.28
1000605 12/01/06 BERLIN, SARAH 247.48
1000606 12/01/06 BIRKHOLZ, TYLER 97.30
1000607 12/01/06 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,285.34
1000608 12/01 /06 GADOW, ANNA 230.10
1000609 12/01/06 HER, CHEE 119.06
1000610 12/01/06 HER, PETER 138.18
1000611 12/01/06 O'GRADY, VICTORIA 93.10
1000612 12/01/06 SCHULZE, KEVIN 162.93
1000613 12/01/06 VANG, HUE 145.95
1000614 12/01/06 VUE, LOR PAO 126.15
471,782.47
ius
001:4,121197TAIOIMl
I ; to] iITS 0 a9 ff PMT47-1Leiff.-MMe
izi LVA 1:4 ILI 011111 CAL VT 1111101:9.0 WT IV LTA 1 0 .11 a
7_x 41111111111150 =-1a TOM IKe1=0
The alarm ordinance adopted by the Council on 8-28-95 includes a provision
that unpaid false alarm charges shall be certified as special assessments.
On October 27th , eleven letters were sent advising companies that their
unpaid invoice(s) for false alarm charges would be added to their property
tax bill for next year if payment was not made by November 30. A few
payments were received in response to these letters.
The remaining unpaid bills that should be certified as special assessments
are as follows:
25.00 for T Mobile at 3001 White Bear Avenue
200.00 for Maplewood Mail at 3001 White Bear Avenue
500.00 for Maplewood Manor at 2266 Duluth
115.00 for Auto Zone at 751 Century Avenue
25.00 for T Mobile USA, Inc. at 3035 White Bear Avenue
40.00 for Old Navy at 3001 White Bear Avenue
50.00 for Kentucky Fried Chicken at 1938 Beam Avenue
25.00 for Real Estate Facilities at 501 Marquette Avenue
40.00 for Joann Etc. at 1739 Beam Avenue
340.00 for Alan Merricks Corner Kick at 1357 Cope Avenue E
It is recommended that 1) the attached resolution be approved to certify
these false alarm charges for collection with property taxes payable in 2007.
P\perm\FALSE ALARMSDOC
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent false alarm
charge for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2006,
collectible in 2007, and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent
8%) on the total amount for one year:
ACCOUNT STREET ADDRESS
PROPERTY
IDENTIFICATION AMOUNT*
T Mobile 3001 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.23.0009 27.00
Maplewood Mall 3001 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.23.0009 216.00
Maplewood Manor 2266 Duluth 09.29.22.44.0158 540.00
Auto Zone 751 Century Avenue 25.29.22.44.0049 124.20
T Mobile USA, Inc.3035 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.21.0016 27.00
Old Navy 3001 White Bear Avenue 02.29.22.23.0009 43.20
Kentucky Fried Chicken 1938 Beam Avenue 02.29.22.31.0058 54.00
Real Estate Facilities 501 Marquette Avenue 18.29.22.14.0011 27.00
Joann Etc.1739 Beam Avenue 03.29.22.14.0015 43.20
Corner Kick 1357 Cope Avenue 10.29.22.32.0014 367.20
TOTAL $1,468.80
Amount includes 8% interest.
FWATC] A 011 RTA 01
FROM: Finance Director
RE: Assessments for Unpaid Ambulance Bills for 2005
U •
It is proposed that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $20,120.14 of
unpaid ambulance bills as special assessments for collection with 2007 property
taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one year.
Annually in December special assessments are levied for unpaid ambulance bills
on property within Ramsey County. During the past 12 months letters were sent
to individuals that had unpaid ambulance bills. The letters indicated that the
balance due for ambulance services along with 8% interest would be added to
their 2007 property taxes if payment was not made within 30 days. In response
to these letters, payments and/or insurance data were received. For the
remaining unpaid bills, property records were reviewed to confirm that the
property owner name matched the ambulance service customer name. There
were 21 matches and these are listed on the attachment for certification.
It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $20,120.14
of unpaid ambulance bills as special assessments for collection with 2007
property taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one
year.
P\agn\assessments b—bills.doc
RESOLUTION
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to
the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached ambulance service charges totaling
20,120.14 for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2006,
collectible in 2007 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total
amount for one year.
P\agn\assessments b—bills.doc
N13GAV Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
ZIld3CLIVZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ZAd3CIJVZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Zinad:[V Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
0axav00C)0 0 0 C,0 C)0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 C)
0INWXAV000CDC)0 0 0 0 0 0 C)C)0 0 C)CD 0 CD 0
0
NNntld v
0
0
W wo-13 C)0 0 0 C)0 C>0 C)0 0 0 C)C)0 0 C)C)C>0 C)
Z oo
w
VINIJV
w
00tOmC>V CO C,C\j 1)CD 00
N M N O O q 00 CO C,CP CO C 05 cc C\4 7
i w w D r-t-CV 6 0 q D 2
ulwv:iv N Om mco N Nm toR 0 C\!C)O C) -I
W U C)
Tl j
m I I
Z)
W NHH AA J
F-
z
o 0tlcoHAISC)c ,0r Cc ,0c ,0c ,0c ,C,c>C)0c ,0r ,Dc ,C,c ,0c ,0c ,Dc ,C,c ,0c ,0c ,C,c>0 C)c , J ,
00
NCD tom C)r-DQ 00t Cl)Q NM 0 MW MC r f-W 1.-I-0 Ln WW Dr-NQ Itto
O C',C,InD QQ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q CL
C,0 43 0 0 C)C,0 Q C,Q 0 Q Q CD 0 CD Q Q 2=
4 Q 8 EOHVd:IV C4 C4 N M M CN N N C14 04 04 N 04 N 04 N 04 04 04 N
C14 C14 N N C14 N N N N N N N N N 04 N N 0
Qs co O m m co a)CO m co M a)m 0)a)C)00 co
N N N N Oy N N Oy N N N N C11 N N C4 N N N N N mOC14ofCDtN0QNV)N V)Cl)le04 0M U)M Q04 tN C14N inN M MQ
Z tU
LU a)r
C) LL
110HAV of x w a of of w of if w of a
z CL LUU2z E
0 LL < 04
0 DWdSAV C)0 O 0 C)0 C>0 C)0 O O C)0 O O CD 0
UQ N 00
0
0 N0 C40 m0 NCD N0 N0 NC NCD N0 N0 NC>NCD N0 N0 NC>NCD N0 N0 0 0
a3dSJV
W E C)0 C n 0 0 C)0 ti n 0 ti n 0 C,0 CD
E - -
E t -0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 m to 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
dq
z E Of
LLJ E .Z d 0 u) Z 0 w
p
z
M to m P w m O N 2 CNI 7N
Agenda Item 14
TO:City Manager
FROM:Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT:Home Occupation License Review
APPLICANT:Mr. [>@Vid GnJp@
LOCATION:1994 Duluth Street
DATE:November 30, 2006
INTRODUCTION
City staff is requesting that the city council review @ home occupation license. The city council
approved this license for Mr. Grup8ho operate Gdigital photography StUdiO in the detached g8[8gR
located on his property at 1894 [)V|Uth Street. The city required Mr. GnJp8[0 get 8 building permit
h0 remodel the garage in order to operate the business from the garage. Mr. Grupo also made
exterior improvements in the backyard of the residence to accommodate clients. These
improvements included installing a six-foot fence for screening and additional landscaping.
Please see the maps beginning OD page thnSR).
n November 8.20U4. the city council first considered this request and tabled action onit to allow
the applicant to make changes to the proposal.
On November 22, 2004. the okv council approved the hVnl8 occupation license for K8c GnJp8 of
Duluth Street tO have @ photography studio in the detached garage. This approval was subject bO
several conditions of approval. (See the council minutes starting on page six).
On November 14.20{5. the city council reviewed this home occupation license and agreed to
review it again in 2006. This additional review was to allow Mr. Grupa time to install privacy fencing
in his backyard.
DISCUSSION
The city issued Mr. GnJp88 building permit b] remodel his garage 0n March 5.20U5. The
remodeling of the detached garage for the purpose of a digital photography studio is complete and
it meets the city conditions for the home occupation license. The remodeling of the garage,
however, was finished late in the fall Of2O85 and ag such, did not allow Mr. GrVp8 time toinstall
the six-foot-high solid fence screening before the winter months. Mr. GrVp8 completed the
installation Of privacy fencing around parts Of his backyard during 2OOS.
Uv staff has not neCHk/8d any complaints about this business and we are not 8vv8r8 of any
problems or issues with Mr. Grupas' home occupation.
Review the home occupation license for the photography study at 1994 Duluth Street again in one
year (December 2007) or sooner if a problem arises or if Mr. Grupa proposes a major chongeto
his home business.
P/eec16/1994 Duluth Home Occupation Review -2000
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. 11-22-04 City Council Minutes
N Attachment 1
RD
LMONT LN
AVE
EAS r," F
Z FRISBIE
W f -
V
rLL
I
a z }
4
Location Map
1994 Du uth Street
Grupa Name ccupatian CUP
N
FROST AVE
t
Zoning iviap
1994 DuluT Street
Grupa Home Occupation CUP
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Wim
ra
I.!]
A
J.
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:05 P.M. Monday, November 22, 2004
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 04-26
CALL TO ORDER:
Attachment 4
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was
called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
City Engineer Ahl announced water quality issues within an isolated area in Maplewood.
St. Paul Regional Water Services (651-266-6350) is aggressively flushing the system and
should have the problem corrected within 48 hours.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Home Occupation License-David Grupa Photography (1994 Duluth Street)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. David Grupa, the applicant, provided further specifics and answered questions from
the council.
d. Wayne Nelson, homeowner at 1995 Duluth Street, addressed the council.
Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to approve the home occupation license for Mr.
Grupa of 1994 Duluth Street to have a photography studio. This approval shall be subject to
the following conditions:
Meet all conditions of the city's home occupation ordinance. This includes:
a. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volume than would
normally be expected in a residential neighborhood.
b. The need for off-street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking
spaces for home occupation at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces
required by the residents.
6
City Council 11-22-04
c. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation that creates noise,
vibration, light, glare, fames, smoke, dust, odors or electrical interference detectable
to the normal senses off the lot.
d. There shall be no fire, safety or health hazards.
e. The studio shall not exceed 514 square feet in area.
2. Customer hours for this home occupation are limited to: Monday through Friday 10 a.m. to
7 p.m. and Saturday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
3. There shall be no more than 25 appointments at the business per week.
4. All customers or visitors to the business shall park on the driveway.
5. Provide a five-pound ABC dry chemical fire extinguisher in the garage.
6. The garage and studio wiring shall meet the state electrical code.
7. Provide a 3-foot egress exit door out of the garage.
8. Obtain a building permit before construction.
9. The remodeling of the exterior of the north and west sides of the garage shall be consistent
with the adjacent properties as to not indicate the presence of a home occupation business.
10. Provide screening along the south border of the backyard from the southeast corner of the
house to the south edge of the lot line and extending at least 10 feet along the east lot line.
This screening is to ensure privacy and lessen the intrusion for the residence located at 1211
Ryan Avenue. This screening should be in the form of a 6-foot-high solid fence or with the
planting of thick shrubs or large trees.
11. There shall be no processing or developing of film on site.
12. The city council may add additional requirements that it deems necessary to ensure that the
operation of the home occupation will be compatible with nearby land uses.
13. The city council shall review this home occupation license again in one year.
14. The owner shall return the garage door to operational use after the end of the home
occupation.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All
7
City Council 11-22-04
Agenda Item 15
T{):
FROM:
SUBJECT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
Woodhill Development
Dahl Avenue, south Of Linwood Avenue
November 30.2OU8
The CUP for the Woodhill Development on Dahl Avenue, south of Linwood Avenue, is due for
review. The CUP is for the Planned Unit Development with 15 single-dwelling housing units in
an R-1 zoning district. (See the maps on pagesihneH+Six\.
BACKGROUND
On February 23, 2004, the city council approved the following for the Woodhill PUD:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for a 15-unit housing
development.
3. The preliminary plat to create the |0Ls in the d8v8|0pnn8nL
3. Azoning nnop change from F /har[n residence) to R-1 (single dwellings). (See the COUnCi|
minutes starting onpage seven).
On November 14, 2005, the city council approved the final plat for Woodhill.
On February 13. 2000, the city council reviewed this permit and requested another review for
April 24 They requested this review because [f two outstanding matters —@Ounpaid
engineering bill and the progress of clean-up work near a wetland that the contractor could not
finish in 2005.
n April 24,2UU8, the city council reviewed this permit and agreed k} review the permit again in
six months. This review and timeline was to ensure the developer continued to keep the site in
proper order, to review the status of the project and to review all the conditions of approval.
DISCUSSION
The contractor is progressing with the construction of the plat. To d8L8 the contractor has
completed the site grading, has installed the utilities, the curb and gutter and base course Cf
bituminous for the street. In addition, the contractor has built two sing le-dwell ings near the corner
of Dahl and Linwood Avenues. However, because of the slowed housing market and the on-going
legal matters with the development, no one has applied for any new building permits recently in
this development.
Since the last review in April, the developer has paid the city for the required engineering bill and
the contractor has cornp|8L8d the required clean-up work near the vv8L8nd as required in the
cease and desist order from August of 2005. (See the e-mail from Erin Laberee on page 15 for
more information about the restoration requirements and efforts.) There is GiiU work for the
contractor and builders to finish on the site including the planting of the rainwater gardens, the
installation of street lights and completing the wetland restoration work. In addition not all the
native seed that the contractor planted got established over last summer. As such, the developer
will need t0 install native plants to finish all the vv8U8nd restoration n]qUir8nn8ntS by June 1. 2007.
expect that the CODtnGCtOr and builders will oO[np|8te the 0ther@bOvG+|ist8d items as they build
more houses in2OO7.
Review the CUP for Woodhill again in one year. This review will be to ensure the developer has
continued [0 keep the site in proper order, [0 rev the status Cf the project andL0nevi8vv8UUl8
conditions ofapproval.
pooc 3-2O/wmodhiU CUP Review -2000(3)
Attachments:
1.Location Map
2.Zoning Map
3.Approved Preliminary Plat
4.Final Plat
5.Febru 23.2O04City Council Minutes
6.April 13, 2006, e from Erin Laberee
0
0
Attachment 1
Location Map AIV
2516 Linwood Avenue
ND, LVVOOD DR —
LINWOOD AVE
7M
L'V44
TRADER c
M—
M
Woodhill
Site
Attachment 2
DEVELOPER
Er W
75,V 5:-
ENGINEER SURVEY ARCHITECT
145. u y _ .1775 „ a E'. if -- 2: 3
I
A NP A! i" k
API FINAL PLAT Li
MINUTES Attachment 5
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:08 P.M., Monday, February 23, 2004
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 04-04
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal
Building, and was called to order at 7:08 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
I __31IIIIIIIIIIIII 114:1 Bic] =lLelff-11
C. ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Present
Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present
2. 9:15 p.m. Woodhill Subdivision (2516 Linwood Avenue)
Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat
Zoning Map Change (F to R-1)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the report.
b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report.
C. Commissioner Dierich presented the Planning Commission Report.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.
The following persons were heard:
Bruce Nedegaard, representing Nedegaard Custom Homes
Mary Dierich, speaking as a private concerned citizen
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to adapt the following resolution approving a conditional
use permit for a planned unit development for the 15-unit Woodhill development on the
south side of Linwood Avenue:
D1614IL Ilk 111 [0]0 F-11 1111111,4-4:111:24 :1 k I Ill d :14- 111111*] 0 In' M13 , X11101 , 1
WHEREAS, Mr. Bruce Nedegaard applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the
Woodhill residential planned unit development (PUD).
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the 15-lot Woodhill development the city received on
January 2, 2004. The legal description is:
The North one-half of the West one-half of the NW' /4 of the NE' /4 of Section, Township
28, Range 22, according to the US Government Survey thereof: and
N
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
The North one-half of the West one-half of the West one-half of the East one-half of the
NVV%of the NE%nf Section 13. Township 28 Range 22 according Uo the US
Government Survey thereof, in Section 13, Township 28. Range 22. Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
The property to be known as Lots 1-6. Block 1 and Lots 1-9. Block 2of WoodhiU)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
ON February 2, 2004, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On February 23 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published
8 notice in the paper and sent notices tO the surrounding property owners. The
council gave everyone 8t the hearing 8 chance k} speak and present written
statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations 0f the city
staff and p|8DDiDg CO[nnliSSiOD.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above-described
conditional use permit because:
The use would be kJc8ted. designed, maintained, constructed and operated h3 be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because Vf excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
0dO[ fU[nSS water or air po||utiOn, dr8iD@ge, vv@tSr run-off, vibration, gSO8[8|
unsightliness, 8|mCtriCG| iDh8rhengOD8 or other nuisances.
5. The VSR vvoV|d generate only rninirnG| vehicular traffic on local streets and vvoU|d not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
8. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
G. The use would maximize the preservation Of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
S. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall hd|ovv the plans approved by the city. The city council may
approve major changes tn the plans. The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes ho the plans. Such changes shall include:
a. Revising the grading and site plans to show:
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
1) The developer minimizing the loss 0r removal of natural vegetation including
keeping and protecting as many of the trees as possible.
2) Revised storm water pond locations and storm water system designs 8s
suggested or required bv the watershed district Vr city engineer. The ponds shall
meet the city's design standards.
2. The proposed construction Vf the plat must b8 substantially started within one year of
council approval Or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for
one year.
1. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall meet all the conditions and changes noted in the city engineer's memo dated
January 22
2. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the Wood hil I development shall be:
a. F setback (from a public street right-of-way): rnininnunn -2Ufeet, nl8xirnUrn
45feet
U. rd setback (public side Gir89L right-of-way): minimum -2Ofeet, nlaxinnVnn -
none
c. Rear-yard setback: 3O feet from any adjacent residential property line
b. Side-yard setback: rnininoUrn - 1U feet from @ property line and 2O feet minimum
between buildings.
5. The developer or contractor shall:
8. COn1o|8t8 all grading for the site drainage and the D0DdS. install all retaining vvGUS
8s required and any other site improvements required by the city engineer and meet
all city requirements.
b. Mace temporary orange safety fencing and signs ot the grading limits.
C. Remove the house, any debris or junk from the site.
6. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded bvCVUn[i|nnRrnb8rRoSsbGch |
Counci|nlennbnrKnppnn moved to approve the Woodhill preliminarV plat (Received bV
the city on February 12, 2004). The developer shall complete the following before the
city council approves the final plat:
1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will:
G. COnlp|Rt8 all grading for overall Site drainage, complete all retaining vvG||S. site
GOdaC8piDg and meet all city r8qUiF8Qn8Dta.
b.° Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs GL the grading limits.
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
c. Have XC8| Energy install Group V rate street lights intwok]CaLVmS- primarily atthe
street intersections and at the west end of the cul-de-sac. The exact style and
location shall b8 subject h3 the city engineer's approval.
d. Provide all required and necessary easements (including all utility easements and
ten-foot drainage and utility easements along the front and rear lot lines of each lot
and five-foot drainage and utility easements along the side lot lines of each lot).
8. Install permanent signs around the edge Of the wetland buffer easements. These
signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state that there shall be no
mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, building, grading or dumping beyond this point.
City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs
them. The developer or contractor shall install these G|QnG before the tib/ issues
building permits in this plat.
t Install survey monuments along the wetland and wetland buffer boundaries.
0. Pay the city for the cost of traffic-control, street identification, wetland buffer and no
parking signs.
h. Provide all required and necessary easements, including any off-site easements.
i. Demolish or remove the existing house and garage from the site, and remove all
other buildings, fencing, tr8i|9rS. scrap nn8t8|, debris and junk from the Site.
j Cap and seal all wells On site that the owners are not using; and remove septic
Sy3hS[ns O[dnaiDfiR|dS subject to k8inn8SOt@ [u|8S and guidelines.
k. {|0rnp|et8 all curb on Linwood Avenue on the north side of the site. This is to replace
the existing driveways on Linwood Avenue, and restore and sod the boulevards.
2.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans
shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, and street plans. The plans
shall meet all the conditions and changes listed in the memo dated January 22
and shall meet the following conditions:
o. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code and shall be
extremely detailed k) the satisfaction of the city engineer.
b. The grading plan shall show:
1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site.
The |[t ||n8G on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat.
2\ Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb.
3\ House pads that:
o. Reduce the grading On sites where the developer can save large trees.
This shall include following the project plans submitted to the city on February
12,2OU4. The house pad locations onLots 5'8.7 and 8. Block 2 shall meet
the approved development setback requirements to more closely match the
other house setbacks and orientation On the street.
b. Meet the 100-fOoL setback from the pipelines for Lot 8, Block 1 and Lot 1.
Block 2.
IR
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
4) The proposed street and driveway grades as Ed|ovxed by the city 8nQin89c
5) All proposed slopes On the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve
the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than
3:1.[)n slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a
stabilization and planting plan. Ada nnininoUnn, the slopes shall be protected with
0) wood-fiber blanket, b8 seeded with 8no-maintenance vegetation and be
stabilized before the city approves the final p|8L
7) Include the tree plan that:
8. 8hOvvS vvhena the developer will nannove. save or replace large tna83. This
plan shall include on inventory of all existing large trees on the site.
b. Shows nV tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits.
7\ All retaining vv8||S on the plans. Any retaining vv8US taller than 4 feet require o
building permit from the city.
G\ Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed district or by the
city engineer.
8) No grading beyond the plat boundary without temporary grading easements
from the affected property 0vvD8r(a).
10) As little grading as possible north and south of the proposed street. This is
LO keep 8S many Cfthe existing trees 0n the site 8sis reasonably possible.
11) The pipelines and the 8-foot-wide trail from the cul-de-sac to the south
property line.
C. The street and utility plans shall show:
1) The street with 8 vv|dih of 28 feet (with parking on one Gid8), shall be 8 9-ton
design with 8 maximum street grade Vf eight percent and the maximum
street grade within 75 feet Of the intersection ot two percent.
2\ The new street (Dahl Avenue) with continuous concrete ribbon curb, except
where the city engineer determines that concrete curbing i8necessary.
3) The completion or r8p|GC80SDt of the Curb On the south side of Linwood
Avenue and the restoration and sodding 0f the boulevards.
4\ Repair of Linwood Avenue (curb, street and boulevard) after the developer
connects hn the public utilities and builds the new street.
5\ A set Vf utility services tV the eastern part Of the property at248ULinwood
v8nU8 and public utility services toeach new lot.
0) The coordination [f the water main alignments and sizing with the standards
and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRVVS).
7\ All utility excavations located within the proposed right-of-ways or within
easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would
be outside the project 8n]8. 11
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
9) The plan and profiles Of the proposed utilities.
9) A detail [f any ponds, the pond outlets and the rainwater gardens. The
contractor shall protect the outlets to prevent erosion.
10) The CU|dG-a8C with @ minimum pavement radius Ofo1 least 42feet.
11\ Label Linwood Avenue and the new street 8S Dahl Avenue 0n all construction
and project plans.
d. The drainage plan Sh8U ensure that there is no increase in the rote of storm water
run-off leaving the site above the current /pnedev8|Vpnnent\ levels. The developer's
engineer shall:
1) \/Rrhy inlet and pipe capacities.
C2\ Submit drainage design t8lcV|GLk}nG.
e. A landscape plan for the areas along the street, including the rainwater gardens
and the cul-de-sac island. The coniferous trees shall be at least six feet tall and
any deciduous trees shall U88t least 21 /2 inches iOdiameter.
I Change the plat osfollows:
8. Add drainage and utility easements GS required bv the city engineer.
b. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines onthe final plat.
These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines
and five feet wide along the side property lines.
o. Label any common areas 8sout|OtS.
d. Label the new street 8G Dahl Avenue on all plans.
e. As may be necessary to ensure that houses on Lot 8, Block 1 and Lot 1. Block
would be8t least 1UO feet from the pipelines.
4. Pay for costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction
p|@Da.
5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development including wetland
buffer easements and any off-site drainage and utility easements. These shall
include, but not be limited to, an easement for the culvert draining the pond at the
northwest corner of the plat.
6. The developer shall complete all site grading and retaining vv8|| construction. The
city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the
developer O[contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
7. Sign a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or
contractor will:
8. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, install all retaining vx8US, install the
landscaping for the rainwater gardens and the Cu|-d8-88C island, install mil2dher
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
necessary improvements and meet all city requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Provide for the repair of Linwood Avenue (street, curb and boulevard) after the
developer connects to the public utilities.
d. Meet all the requirements of the City engineer.
8. Submit the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the director of community
development. These are ho assure that there will be one responsible party for the
nn8int8n8nC8 of the COnnnnnn areas, landscaping and retaining vv8||s.
9. Record the following with the final plat:
8. All homeowners' association documents.
b.A covenant or deed restriction with the final plat that prohibits any driveways on
Lots 1 through 0. Block 1 and Lot 9, Block 2from going onto Linwood Avenue.
c. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision Vr splitting of
the |OtS Or p8[CG|S in the plat that would Cr88b8 additional building Sib8a un|SSS
approved bv the city council.
d. A covenant or association documents that addresses the proper installation,
maintenance and replacement of the retaining vv8||3.
8. Deeds transferring the ownership of{)uUnts Aand B to the city. The city will
accept ownership of these outlots in lieu of charging PAC (park access charges)
with the building permits.
All wetland and wetland buffer easements.
The applicant shall submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to
the city for approval before recording.
0. Obtain 8 permit from the Ramsey-Washington K88in} Watershed District for grading.
10. Obtain a NPDES construction permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
MPCA).
11. Submit to city staff a copy of the written permission from the pipeline company for
any grading nr construction within the pipeline easement.
12. The property owner shall submit a petition to the city requesting the installation of
the public improvements.
13. |f the developer decides LV final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director Cf
community development may waive any conditions that d0 not apply Lo the final
The developer must complete these conditions before the city issues agrading permit
Or approves the final plat. 13
City Council Meeting 02-23-04
Seconded bvCOUnCi|nlenlb8rROsSb@Ch |
Councilmember Koppen moved to adoot the following zoning mag change resolution
from F (farm Residence) to R-1 (single Dwelling Residential) for the proposed Woodhill
plat on the south side of Linwood Avenue:
ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION 04-02-035
VVHERE/\S, MmoevvOOd city staff i3 proposing to change the K48o|evvoOd zoning nnop
from Farm Residence (F)b] Single-Family Residential /R-1\.
WHEREAS, this change applies tO the property located 8t2518 Linwood Avenue iDthe
north one-half of Section 13, Township 29 Range 22, in K8@p|8vvo0d, k8inD8S0t@.
WHEREAS, the property owner is proposing t0 plat the property into 15 lots for single
dwellings.
WHEREAS, the proposed development iS known S8VVOodhi|| and the new legal
description will be:
Lots 1 through 6, Block 1, and Lots 1 through 9, Block 2, Woodhill.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
On February 2, 2004. the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve the zoning map change.
2. (]D February 23. 20O4. the city council held 8 public hearing. City staff published @
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The council conducted the public hearing whereby all public present were given a
chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports
and recommendations from the city staff and planning COnnnnisSiOn.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-
described
The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure 8rd8tn][tfn}mLheUG80fneighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences Of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have nonegative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, S8vverG,
police and fire protection and schools.
5. The owner has plans to develop this property for lots for single-family houses.
Seconded bvCOUnCi|nlenlb8r ROsSb8Ch |
14
City Council 02-23-04
Attachment 6
From:Erin Laberee
Sent:Thursday, April 13, 2006 1:38 PM
To:Ken Roberts
Subject:Woodhill
Ken,
I visited the Woodhill site on Tuesday, April 11th, 2006 to inspect the wetland mitigation requirements Northpine agreed to
do. The following items were required of them:
1) Remove sediment from the eastern wetland that was deposited when the silt fence was breached. Disturbance in
the wetland must be kept to an absolute minimum.
2) Create an additional 500 square feet of wetland in the eastern wetland by excavating the area flagged by staff, just
north of the existing wetland.
3) Remove trees flagged by city staff. To prevent resprouting, all cut stumps shall have Garlon painted on the stumps
within 15 minutes of cutting. (25 % -42% Roundup may be substituted if temperatures are above freezing.)
4) A wood weir shall be constructed to retain an additional foot of water in the eastern wetland.
5) All disturbed area shall be covered with an erosion control blanket and seeded with a temporary cover crop mixed
in with a native grass as specified by Ginny Gaynor.
6) A gradual infiltration basin shall be created north of the western wetland.
7) The gully that was created when the silt fence was breached shall be filled in, protected with erosion control
blanket, seeded with a temporary cover crop and a native seed mix. If the native seed mix does not establish,
plugs will be required.
All of the above requirements have been completed. Staff will inspect the native seeding this summer and fall to
determine if additional plugs are required. Staff will also monitor the infiltration basin just north of the westerly
pond to ensure it is adequate in size to slow runoff flowing to the wetland.
Erin
IN
Agenda Item 16
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Bill Priefer, Public Works Operations Analyst
SUBJECT: County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to TH 61), City Project 02-07, and
County Road D Extension (West of TH 61), City Project 02-08: Approve
Resolution for State Aid Variance
17-1 % 9 411111111111111111 ITT9 - " I, P7W ,
INTRODUCTION
It is necessary to request a variance from State Aid rules in order to secure State Aid funding in
the amount of $3,010,260 for the County Road D Extension projects, City projects 02-07 and 02-
08.
LmoI
State Aid rules require that the plans and specifications for Municipal State Aid funded projects be
approved by Mn/DOT before bids are opened by the city. However, in order to advance both city projects,
bids were opened before the plans and specifications were approved by Mn/DOT. Now, in order to secure
the eligible funding, a variance must be approved by the State Aid Variance Committee at the December
14, 2006 Variance Committee meeting. In order to approve the variance request, a certified resolution
must be forwarded to Mn/DOT requesting the variance.
Z1 *6141 LY, I LY, 1:4 Z I BY-A 1 [01 Z
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution requesting a variance from State
Aid Operations Rules for the County Road D Extension projects, County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to
TH 61), City Project 02-07 and County Road D Extension (West of TH 61), City Project 02-08.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Location Map
RESOLUTION
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FROM STATE AID OPERATIONS RULES — CHAPTER 8820 —
ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDING FOR COUNTY ROAD D EXTENSION PROJECTS (MSAP's 138-
112-05, 138- 121 -03 AND 138- 020 -29)
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood opened bids in advance of receiving state aid approval of final
plans and specifications for the County Road D Extension projects (MSAP's 138 - 112 -05, 138 - 121 -03 and
138 - 020 -29), and
WHEREAS, said approval is required by State Aid Rules Chapter 8820.2800 subpart 2 to be
eligible for municipal State Aid funding, and
WHEREAS, it was necessary to open bids early to further advance the County Road D Extension
projects,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
That the council hereby requests a variance from said rules and directs the City Engineer to appear
before the State Aid Variance Committee and explain the need for variance and the reasons why the
project was let before State Aid approval was given.
r
rk ,
CWN'ry RoAp
REALIGNMENT
SFGMtNT I
D D
a r
Agenda Item L1
TO:City Manager
FROM:Ken Roberts, Planner
SUBJECT:Alley Vacation
LOCATION:Between Frost and Fenton Avenues and between Walter Street and
Pho|anP|oon
DATE:November 28.2008
Ms. Judith Driscoll Of189S Walter Street iS proposing Ul8tthRcitvv8c8t8@DSxiSbOg8]ksv.This
unused alley runs north and south b8bw8SD Frost and Fenton Avenues and is between VVo|tRr
Stn8RL and Pha|Hn P|G&8. K8S. OhscV|| vv8nLS the city [0vacate this 8||Hy because it has not been
used in several years and 3O she would have additional private property behind her existing
house. (Please see the applicant's statement on pages three and four and the maps and plans on
pages five through seYen.\
DISCUSSION
The city acquired the alley in question many years ago when the developer [f the Kavanagh and
D8vvSVn'8/\dditinn recorded the final plat with Ramsey County. M8. [>hsCOU is requesting the
alley vacation because her existing house is set near the rear of her property. By having the city
vacate the alley, she (and her neighbors) will acquire 8n additional ten feet [f land along the rear
sides of their properties. Neither the city nor the developer of the neighborhood ever paved or
improved the alley.
Jon J@rOaChOf the city engineering department reviewed this request. (Please see his comments
on pG08 eight.) He stated that the city does not have 8 need for the 8U8y in qUSSt0O. He noted,
however, there is 8 low area near Fenton /kxenU8 that could collect s[0nn water. Part of the |ovv
area appears to be in the alley. As such, he is recommending that the city keep o drainage and
utility easement over the entire vacated alley. Such 8n easement also would accommodate the
needs of }{C9| Energy for their existing pVvv8r lines.
The property owner 8L1807Ph8|en Place, Mr. BV8h|nl8n,is asking the city to keep 8L least part
0f the alley |n place from the rear 0f his property LO Frost Avenue. This iSS0he may have access
to the rear of his property. (Please see his survey comments on page ten.) As Ms. Driscoll notes
in her statement, the city could vacate the part Vf the alley from Fenton Avenue north b} the north
property line of her property and then keep the remainder nf the alley inplace (the north 113feet)
for the access tO Frost Avenue.
The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build an alley or public utilities in this
location. Maplewood has no plans to develop or use the existing alley for any type of public
access.
On November 20, 2006, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed alley
Approve the resolution Vn page 12. This resolution k5 for the vacation Vf the north-south alley that
is between Frost and Fenton Avenues and is between Walter Street and Phalen Place
the north 113 feet adjacent to Frost Avenue). The reasons for the vacation are as follows:
It is in the public interest.
2. The city and the property owner do not need or use the alley in question for street, 8CCeSs or
public utility purposes.
3. The properties adjacent t0 the alley have 8d8OV8LH street access.
This vacation is subject to the city keeping a drainage and utility easement over the vacated alley.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
Application Date
The city received the complete application and plans for this request on October 24, 2006. State
law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a land
use proposal. As such, city action is required on this proposal by December 22, 2006.
P:\moo10V\lley Vacation (drboo|) 2000
Attachments:
1. Applicant's Statement
2. Location Map
3. Address Map
4. Property Survey
5. Comments from Jon Jamach dated November 2.2OOO
0. Letter dated November 2.2000 from Xcm|Energy
7. Survey Comments from Edward Buoh|mon
8. Letter dated October 30.20OO from Wayne Sachi
Q. Vacation Resolution
Judith Driscoll
1896 Walter Street
Maplewood, 'NlN 55109
OCT
October 12, 2006
RE CE I VED
Members of the Maplewood City Council
7 \4aplewood City Hall
1830 County Rd B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Vacation of Alley running parallel to Walter Street and Phalen Place from Frost
Avenue to Fenton Place,
Dear Council Members:
3
my lot. This would allow Mr. Buebirnan to reach the gate to his backyard fence via the
remaining sedion of alley,
I thank you for your time and attenrion in the consideration of this request, Please do not
hesitate to call me at 612 9612199 ("11) or 651 793 9495 (home) should you have any
questions,
Attacrment 1
c
0
pol 01
N
Attachment
Attachment 5
Page I of I
M
A 6
Xceltr:
City of Maplewood
Ken Roberts
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, NIN 55109
To Whom It May Concern.
1700 East County Road E
White Bear L,ake, Minnesota 55110-4658
Xcel Energy has no objection to the easement vacation requested byJudith
Driscoll of 1896 Walter Street,
However, Xcel Energy retains the right to maintain and operate the existing
Electric facilities in the proposed vacated easement..
If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 51-779-3122,
N
At7-achment 7
October 27, 2006
F.DW.kpD BU-EHUv1,k-\-
1907 pHALFN-'?L
pAL 5 5 09
hA hrnnn-,M vacation.
2. Call me at (551) 249-2303 or e-mall me at Ken.Roberts@Cl.Maplewood.MN,U8,
It
NEW
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEYEL P N i 1-249-2300 FAX: 651-249-2319
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 183 0 COUNTY ROAD B EAST MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
October 30, 2006
To Mr, Kenneth Roberts
Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, NN 55109
From: Wayne Sachi
I 100 Frost Ave.
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Request for alley vacation by Ms. Judy Driscoll, 1896 Walter St.
Wayne Sachi
II
WHEREAS, Ms. Judith Driscoll of1896Walter Street applied for the vacation of the
following alley:
That north-south alley iO Block 3 Kavanagh and D@vvaOn's Addition hJ Gladstone, that iS
between 8 point 113 feet south of the south right+}f-vv8y line Cf Frost Avenue and the north hghL+}f-
vvoy|ineOfFent0nAvenueondbetwx*en\A/8|barGtneet8DdPha|enP|ooe8Sshownonthep|otOf
Kavanagh and Dawson's Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota (in Section 16, Township 29,
Range 22).
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On November 20, 2006, the planning commission held a public hearing about this
proposed vacation. The city staff published o notice iD the paper and sent notices k]the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone 8t the hearing 8
chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that
the city council approve the vacation.
2. {}n December 11,2UU0, the city council reviewed this proposal. The council also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, the public fee title interest in the property
will go to the following described properties:
1. 19OYPhS|8nPlace PIN 1 18)
2. 188SPh8|8OPlace PIN 1 11)
3. 18Q3PhG|8DPlace PIN 16-29-22-42-0012)
4. 1101 Fenton Avenue PIN 1 013)
5. 1896 Walter Street PIN 16-29-22-42-0014)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described
vacation for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The city and the property owner Uo not need or use the alley in question for street, access
Vr public utility purposes.
3. The properties adjacent to the alley have adequate street access.
This vacation is subject to the city keeping a drainage and utility easement over the vacated alley
in question.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on .2008.
Agenda Item L2
Wei :4
Applicant: Semper Development, representing Mogren
Landscaping and Walgreens
Location: Northeast Corner of Beam and White Bear
Avenues
Existing Zoning: Limited Business Commercial
Existing Land Use: Limited Business Commercial
Proposed Zoning: Business Commercial
Proposed Land Use: Business Commercial
City Council Hearing Date: December 11, 2006
60-Day Deadline: December 18, 2006
Project Description: Semper Development, representing Mogren Landscaping
and Walgreens, is proposing to construct a 14,738-square-foot Walgreens retail
store with a drive-through pharmacy on a vacant lot located on the northeast
corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues. The proposal includes subdividing the
2.83-acre lot into two lots. The western lot will be sold to Semper Development
for the development of the proposed Walgreens and the eastern lot will be
retained by the Maplewood Financial Center (Premier Bank) for future
development.
Requests: The property is zoned and guided in the city's comprehensive plan
as Limited Business Commercial (LBC), which allows for offices, medical or
health-related clinics, day care centers, or similar uses. In order to operate a
retail store and pharmacy from the newly subdivided western lot, the proposal
also includes a request for a comprehensive land use plan and zoning map
change to Business Commercial (BC). In addition, the applicant is requesting a
lot division and design review for the project.
Recommendations: The planning commission recommended approval of the
lot division, comprehensive land use plan change, and zoning map change at
their November 20 meeting. The community design review board recommended
approval of the design review for the project at their November 28 meeting. Staff
also recommends approval of the overall project with several conditions as
outline in the report.
MEMORANDUM
TO:Greg Copeland, City Manager
FROM:Sh@nD FiOVV@lL /\ICP Planner
SUBJECT:Walgreens Retail Store and Drive-Through Pharmacy
LOCATION:Northeast Corner Of Beam and White Bear Avenues
DATE:December 4.2006 for the December 11 City Council
Meeting
Project Description
SS[npe[ Development, representing Moo[8n Landscaping 8DdVV@|gr8BnS.iapnJp0ainA
O construct G 14.738'sqVare-h]OLVV8|gn8RnG retail store with 8 dhvR-UlnDUQh pharmacy
on8 vacant lot located On the northeast corner [f Beam and White Bear Avenues. The
pr0p0S8| includes subdividing the 2.83-aone lot into two lots. The western lot will be sold
to Semper Development for the development of the proposed Walgreens and the
eastern lot will be retained by the Maplewood Financial Center (Premier Bank) for future
development.
The property is zoned and guided inthe city's comprehensive plan 86 Limited Business
Cornnneroig| (LBC) which o||ovvS for offices, medical or health-related C|iniCs, day care
centers, or similar U888. In order to operate a retail GiOne and pharmacy from the newly
subdivided western lot, the proposal also includes a request for a comprehensive land
use plan and zoning map change ho Business Commercial (BC).
Requests
To build this development, the applicants are requesting that the city approve the
Lot division in order to subdivide the 2.83-acre |[t into two G8p8r8LR lots.
2. Comprehensive land use plan change from LBC to BC.
179 1971 0011 "1 021
4. Design review.
BACKGROUND
May 28.2OU4: The City Of Maplewood received complete land use applications from the
Maplewood Financial Center (Premier Bank) for a comprehensive land use plan change,
zoning map change, and design review for a proposed Walgreens retail store and
pharmacy and a future office building to be located on the northeast corner of Beam and
White Bear Avenues. City staff soon received notice from the underlying property owner
K80gr8n Landscaping) that Maplewood Financial Center's lease 0n the land did not
allow the development of a pharmacy and that they were disputing the applicants'
request to rezone the property. City staff notified the applicants of this issue and
discontinued processing the permit until the applicants were able hJ obtain the
underlying property owner's permission to rezone or a court order which directed the city
to proceed.
May 1O.2805: AcoUrt order was given that effectively denied K4oQnenL8ndGc8ping's
request to stop the rezoning process by finding that Maplewood Financial Center could
develop the leased premises for any |@vvfU| purpose." With this COUd Onder, city staff
began processing the land use applications again.
July 1O.2005: A court order was given that effectively denied MOgF8OLoDdSC8ping'S
request for 8 LennpOn8ry injunction and L8rnpon8ry restraining order to require the city to
stop processing and/or granting the applicant's rezoning request. Given the
requirements of Minnesota St8tUtea, Section 15.99 which require cities to process o land
use application within 60 days, city staff was compelled to continue with the land use
application oa requested by the applicant.
July 18,2OO5: The planning commission reviewed and recommended approval ofG
comprehensive land use plan change and a zoning map change from LBC to BC for the
west 29U feet 0f the vacant property.
July 20.20O5: The C0RB reviewed and recommended approval 0f the design review 0f
the originally proposed VVG|gr89nS retail store and pharmacy. The C[)FlB made this
recommendation based on the condition that the building elevations be improved and
resubmitted to the C[}RB.
July 2Y.20U5: After review Vf the city's ordinances and Minnesota case law, the city
attorney's office submitted @ legal opinion to city Staff which stated that the city should
stop action or deny the applicant's zoning map change request on the rationale that the
applicants have n0 standing to file for such zoning map change.
August 8.20U5: The city council denied the applicant's request for @comprehensive
land use plan and zoning map change from LBCtOBC for the west 29O feet 0fthe
vacant property based on the city attorney's legal opinion which stated that: 1)K8og[GO
Landscaping is an owner of the land holding the fee iiU8 interest and 8 fU|| reversion in
the lease; 2\K8Ognan Landscaping opposes the comprehensive land use plan and
zoning map change; 3) the Maplewood Financial Center is not an exclusive owner of the
property; and 4\ there iSnO agreement between the owners regarding the
comprehensive land use and zoning map change.
DISCUSSION
This project vv8Gr9v8vvedon9ye8r8goincombinaUOnwith8p bank project tV
be |OCGL8d on pFUpBhv t0 the east of this site. This project is now presented as G stand
alone VV8|gpeens retail store and pharmacy on its own lot. The applicants have noplans
ot this time for the property ho the east. The previous ground lease on the property,
which was the result Oflegal proceedings described in the background Section above,
has been modified to8 purchase of the land.
FFA
Lot Division
The applicants are requesting a lot division in order k} subdivide the 2.83-aCr9 vacant lot
into two lots. The westerly 1.54-a[re lot (Parcel A) will b8developed with the proposed
VV8|grBeOS retail store and pharmacy. The easterly 1.3-acre lot (P8[CB| B) will be
retained by the Maplewood Financial Center for future development. City code allows lot
divisions which create three or less |OtG LO be handled administratively. Since this
project requires other land use approvals, staff is recommending that the city council
take action on the lot division request as well.
Conditions of lot division approval should include the owner dedicating easements to
accommodate utility, access, and roadway over Parcel AGsfollows: 1\ utility easement
on the east side of Parcel A to accommodate the relocation of storm sewer and water
main from Beam Avenue hJ the property to the north (2Q5OWhite Bear Avenue); 2\
access easement on the east side of Parcel A to accommodate access to the property to
the north (295O White Bear Avenue) and the property tO the east (Parcel B);3\
relocation of access easement on the north side of Parcel A and the south side of the
property to the north (2950 White Bear Avenue) to accommodate the driveway located
on the north side of the Walgreens' building and the shared curb cut on White Bear
Avenue; and 4) a ten-foot-wide roadway easement along White Bear Avenue the entire
length of Parcel A to accVnlnnVdaL8 for future n}8dvv8y widening.
Limited Business Commercial Zoning
The LBC land use and zoning designation allows for limited commercial uses including
offices, medical or health-related c|iniCs, and day Cane centers. This type of designation
has been historically placed on property that is adjacent residential uses to ensure no
negative commercial impacts t0surrounding residential properties. There are residential
uses located across Beam Avenue as well as the Maplewood Heights city park adjacent
the property to the east. To construct 8 retail store and pharmacy on the property the
city must change the comprehensive land use plan and zoning map on the property to
BC. The applicants are requesting this change Vn the newly subdivided western lot
F`GrC8| A\; with the eastern lot (Parcel B) to remain the existing LBC land use and
zoning designation.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Change
The city does not have any specific criteria for comprehensive land use plan changes
but any such change should be consistent with the goals and policies iDthe
comprehensive plan. |n this case, there are six land use goals and eight development
policies in the plan that the city should consider when reviewing this request.
The applicable land use goals include:
1. Provide for orderly development.
2. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods.
3. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase
jobs, and provide desirable services.
3
4. Minimize the land planned for streets.
5. Minimize conflicts between land uses.
0. Prevent premature use, overcrowding, or overuse of land, especially when
supportive services and facilities such as utilities, drainage systems, or streets
are not available.
The applicable development policies (to implement the plan goals) include:
1. The city will not approve new development without providing for adequate
facilities and services, such 8s sLne9t. Vd|iLi8G, drainage, parks, and Open space.
2. Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties.
3. Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a
negative economic, social, 0[ physical impact 0n adjoining developments.
4. Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar
uses front 0n the same street 0rat borders of areas separated by major man-
nnad8OrnatUn8| barriers.
5. The city coordinates land use changes with the character Of each neighborhood.
0. Group compatible businesses in suitable areas.
7. Avoid disruption Uf adjacent Or nearby residential areas.
The proposal to change the comprehensive land use plan for Parcel A meets all of these
goals and development policies.
Zoning Map Change
Amajority of the properties along White Bear Avenue, north of Beam Avenue, are zoned
BC and include higher-impact uses such as restaurants and retail facilities. The
development Vf8VVa|gne8n8 retail store and pharmacy On the portion Vf the property
adjacent White Bear Avenue is consistent with the existing land uses and character of
the area, including the White Bear Avenue corridor.
Design Review
In conjunction vviththe|Ot8rSt8te0S4inlp[0v8nl8nbSSChRdubedh3r20OO Bear
Avenue iS proposed 8s8 six-lane roadway. TO ensure these improvements are possible
and ensure better traffic flow and access to and from this property, the city is requiring
that the applicants grant to the city 8 ten-foot-wide right-of-way easement along White
Bear Avenue. The site plan reflects this easement.
1H
CVrbCVLs/Dhvevv8Vs
There are two existing curb cuts into the property, one along Beam Avenue and one
along White Bear Avenue. The site plan shows the widening Of the Beam Avenue curb
cut k}J2feet. This curb cut will b8 shared bvVVo|Q[8eOS the future development OD
Parcel B, and the retail center to the north. The Site plan also shows the nernov8| of the
White Bear Avenue curb cut on the property, with the relocation and expansion of the
existing curb cut accessing the retail center to the north. This will create one shared
curb cut for the two properties onto White Bear Avenue. Both shared curb cuts will b8
covered under the proposed access easements as described in the lot division section of
the report.
Sidewalks
There is an existing Gid8vva|h |oC8t9U along White Bear Avenue which will remain with
the development proposal. The site plan also shows 80-fo0tvvide concrete sidewalk tO
b8 located on Beam Avenue, extending the entire length Of Parcel A. Since the city iS
reviewing the overall site (Parcels A and B\, staff recommends that the applicant
construct the sidewalk along the entire length of both parcels.
White Bear Avenue iG scheduled for reconstruction in28U8. The intersection atWhite
Bear and Beam Avenues will also beaffected. |n lieu Of constructing G sidewalk 0O
Beam Avenue at this time, the applicant should submit an equivalent dollar amount to
the city for this work LO be cOnnp|9L8 in 2008. FlRC0nGtnJCLion of the existing White Bear
Avenue sidewalk, if needed, will be accomplished ga part of the overall street project.
Site Layout
The building and parking |0t meet orexceed required setbacks of 30 feet and 15 feet to
the hght-of-vv8yrespectively. The proposed two-lane drive-through pharmacy iS
proposed on the east side [f the building with entrance from Beam Avenue and exit onto
White Bear Avenue.
City code requires retail stores to have one parking stall per 20Osquare feet of retail
space and one parking stall per 1,008 square feet Vf storage space. TheVVa|gr88n8
development requires 03 parking stalls based OD these requirements. The applicants
are proposing 63 parking stalls, which includes four handicap accessible stalls. The
parking stalls will be 10 feet wide by 18 feet deep, which nn89Ls city code requirement for
g nabai| (high turnover) use.
Landscaping
The landscape plan shows 18 trees, including 14 deciduous trees and 4 ornamental
trees, and 54shrubs. The plan also calls out underground irrigation foro|||ondSCapin8
aS required hvcode. Staff recommends the following additions/changes b}the
landscape plan:
1. Twenty additional shrubs and forty perennial plants tOb8 planted along Beam
and White Bear Avenues.
5
2. Any disturbed land on Parcel B must b8 planted and maintained with sod 0r
native prairie grasses until the development of this portion of the property in the
Lightinq
City code requires the submittal O[8 lighting 8ndoh0tometricsp|8nvvhidlenSVreG8U
freestanding lights maintain a height of25 ha6d or less and that the maximum foot
candies of illumination at all pn}p8Mx lines does not exceed A-foot-candles. The lighting
and photometrics plan shows four freestanding lights (25 feet in height) and four wall
pack lights. There is8n area along the Beam Avenue property line which exceeds the
light illumination maximum slightly (.8-f00t-c8nd|8S). The ph0tOnn9tricS plan should be
revised t0 ensure the light illumination at all property lines does not exceed A-fnot-
S8nd|es.
DumDster Enclosure
The location of the two proposed dVrnonter enclosures iSOn the northwest side [fthe
building. The enclosures will be eight feet in height, constructed of face brick to match
the building, and will have cedar enclosure gates.
The city's sign Cnd8S that all multi-tenant buildings (buildings with five Ormore
tenants) must be reviewed by the CDRB for approval of a comprehensive sign plan. All
other signs are approved administratively and nnVsL comply with the Sign requirements of
each specified zoning district.
If this site is rezoned to BC, the sign code would allow up to five signs on this property.
The size of the wall signs would be limited to 20 percent of the gross wall area on which
the sign isattached. Freestanding signs are limited to25 feet in height (height can be
increased with increased setbacks\, nnVSt maintain a 10-hJVt setback tV all property lines,
and can be Up to 300 SqU@F8 feet in @n88. No signs which contain blinking or flashing
lights are allowed, unless associated with public service messages such 8s8bank's
time and temperature sign. In addition, 8freesL8nding sign located on an intersection
must meet the city's visibility requirements and maintain @25-h]Vt triangular clearance
from the intersecting rights-of-way.
The 2OO5VV@|orSRnS' proposal included @25-foJt-hi hSigDhJbG|0C@tHd0lUleQJ[DG[
of Beam and White Bear Avenues. The sign was proposed with Gn89'sqUare-foxJ sign
t8c8 and a 36-square-foot electronic reader board face.
During the CDRB's review of the CVS Pharmacy located on the corner of County Road
B and White Bear Avenue in 2005 the CDRB expressed concern over the size of CVS's
proposed sign in relation to the size of the proposed building and the surrounding
properties. CVS had proposed a freestanding sign which was similar in size and height
t0VV8|greens' original freestanding sign pn3pQ8@|. While the city's SiQD code does not
require 8pppOv8| of single-tenant building signs by the C[}RB. the city's CDRB ordinance
does state that the CDRB is charged with reviewing the general architectural
C0D3ider@tiOOS of Con0[n8n:i8| site including the CO|0r3 and [n@tBriG|3 to be used in the
site, the physical and architectural relationship Ofthe pnOp0S8d structures with existing
M
and proposed structures in the area, and the appropriateness Of"graohiCs" toLeused
0n the site. The ordinance further states that the CDF<B may recommend any actions
that it deems reasonable tV its action Vfapproval.
Because of the prominent location of this site as the entryway into the Maplewood Mall
area, the site location on two major interG9CLions
Beam Avenue, city staff finds it reasonable for the CDRB to make recommendations on
the size of the and architectural design of all signs on the Walgreens' development as
part [f its action Vfapproval. For this reason, staff recommends all proposed signs for
the VVo|gnenn'n development be reviewed and approved by the CDRB.
Based on staff and the CDRB's concerns expressed about the size and style of the sign
proposed in 2005, the applicants are now proposing a 15-foot-high monument style sign
to be located on the corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues. The sign will be
constructed of face brick and manufactured limestone to match the building and will
include an 18-SqU8nS-fU0tVV8|gre8OS Drive Through Pharmacy sign and 8 42-SquGrR-
f0Ot manual reader board sign. |D addition the applicants are proposing eight walls signs
including four VV8|grHens signs on all elevations (each 52 square feet in8peG\.two one
hour photo signs (each 21 square feet in one8) and two pharmacy signs (each 18
square feet in area) on the west and south elevations. All wall signs t0be constructed Of
individual letters which are internally illuminated.
Staff commends the applicants for their revised 2006 freestanding sign which is
attractive and compatible LO the building. The sign iG also consistent with the approved
freestanding sign for CVS. However, staff does not see o need for VVa|Qreen3ai8noge
on all elevations and recommends the removal of two of the signs on the north and east
elevation as part Vf the design review approval.
Building Elevations
The exterior of the building will be constructed with face brick, smooth faced
nn8nVh]CtVr8d |inn9stVne. clear anodized 8|VnninVnn storefront windows, and standing
seam roof awnings. The 2008building elevations also propose G31-fOot-highentry
tower with g|oSS e|S[nSDtS GS requested by the C0RB in 2005.
Staff recommends that the south and west elevations (Beam and White Bear Avenues)
be revised t0 have the windows begin two feet from ground grade. This can be
accomplished by the addition [f true or false windows. This will give the windows more
0f8 human scale appearance.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
November 20 The planning commission recommended approval Of the lot
division, comprehensive land use plan change, and zoning map change (Attachment
24).
November 28,20O8: The CDRB recommended approval Of the design r8vew for
Walgreens (Attachment 25).
7
CITIZEN COMMENT
Staff surveyed the 39 property owners and managers 0f businesses within 5O0 feet Of
this property for their comments on the proposed development. One property owner
responded oSfollows: Linda Barber, 2U4O Beam Avenue, indicated that she was in
favor of the Walgreens retail store and pharmacy.
Watershed District: Tina Carstens, permit program coordinator, states that the
Ramsey/Washington KXEtn} VV8t9r8heU District n]0ek/ed 8 permit application for this
project in 2004. Thepermit went before the watershed district board and was approved
pending the receipt of a maintenance agreement for the stormwater treatment device.
The agreement was never submitted and the permit was never issued. The applicant
will therefore be required to resubmit an application to the watershed district for the new
project. The applicant will be required to comply with the vv8t8rGh8d district's new [U|eS
and standards that were adopted this year.
Building O8p8rtnn8nL: [)8v9 Fisher, interim community development director and building
official, reviewed the development proposal and has the following comments: 1) the city
will require complete building code analysis when the construction plans are submitted
to the city for building permits; 2) all exiting must gVtV 8 public way; 3\ provide adequate
fire department access t0 the buildings; 4) provide fire sprinklers t0NFPA 13; 5\ |vvOU|d
recommend o pre-construction meeting with the contractor, the project nnonGQ8[GDdthS
city building inspection department; 6) verify the lighting is kept on site within the city
ordinances; 7) verify location of the monument signs so they are not installed within the
25-foot site triangle; 8) provide structural engineering on the attachment of the signs to
the building and the monument sign over six feet inheight.
Fire Department: Butch G8rv8iS, fire marshal, reviewed the development proposal and
has the following cOrnrn9ntS: 1) install fire protection per code; 2\ monitor fire protection
system per code; 3) minimum width 20 feet access road; 4) properly protect any gas or
e|8{triC8| equipment that is located in any traffic area.
Police Department: Lieutenant Kevin R@bbett recommends the standard surveillance
lighting nvnienn for commercial buildings and 8 high-quality video recording system b} be
installed (especially covering the pharmacy area) because of the potential for
prescription forgery and robbery incidents.
VA
Approve the lot split boundary exhibit date stamped October 5, 2006, for a lot
division request to subdivide the 2.83-acre lot located on the northeast corner of
Beam and White Bear Avenues into two lots. Lot division approval is based on
code requirements (Section 34-14 - lot divisions) and is subject to the following:
a. Submit a revised survey to staff for approval which shows the following:
1 ) Legal descriptions of Parcels A and B.
M
2) Location and legal description of8 utility and access easement on
the east side of Parcel Ab} accommodate utilities and access for
the property b] the north /295O White Bear Avenue) and access
for the property to the east (Parcel B).
3) Location and legal description Of8n access easement on the north
side Of Parcel A and the south side 0f the property tO the north
2S5O White Bear Avenue) to accommodate the driveway located
on the north side of the VVa|gn]en8' building and the shared curb
cut on White Bear Avenue.
4) Location and legal description of8ten-foOt-wid8roadway
easement along White Bear Avenue the entire length of Parcel A
to accommodate for future roadway widening.
b. Deeds describing the two new legal descriptions for Parcels A and B.
including the required utility, access, and roadway easement descriptions
described above.
C. Deeds must be recorded with Ramsey County within one year of the date
of |VL division approval or the lot division will become null and void (city
code requirement).
d. Prior to issuance [fG grading Or building permit for the proposed
VV8|Qreena retail store and pharmacy 0n Parcel A, the following must be
submitted to staff for approval:
1\ Proof that Ramsey County has recorded the deeds.
2\ A signed certificate of survey for Parcel A showing the location of
all property lines, bui|din8, p8rkin8, driveway, freestanding sign.
and easements.
2. Adopt the comprehensive land use plan change resolution (Attachment 22). This
resolution changes the comprehensive land use plan for the newly subdivided
1.54 acre western lot (Parcel A) on the vacant lot located on the northeast corner
of Beam and White Bear Avenues from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to
Business Commercial /BC\. The city is making this change because itwill:
8. Provide for orderly development.
b. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods.
C. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base,
increase jobs and provide desirable services.
d. Minimize the land planned for streets.
8. Minimize conflicts between land uses.
N
Prevent premature use, overcrowding, or overuse Of land especially when
supportive services and facilities, such gS utilities, drainage systems, Or
streets are not available.
Q. Help to i[no|SOleDt the gU@|S of the CO[nprRhSDaive plan including:
1) The city will not approve new development without providing for
adequate facilities and services, such 8sstreet, uti|iti93, drainage,
parks, and open space.
2) Safe and adequate access will bB provided for all properties.
3\ Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should
not create 8negative economic, social, Or physical impact On
adjoining developments.
4\ Whenever possible, changes in types 0f land use should occur SO
that similar USRS front on the SGnnH street or at borders of areas
separated by major man-made or natural barriers.
5) The city coordinates land use changes with the character nfeach
6) Group compatible businesses in suitable areas.
7) Avoid disruption of adjacent or nearby residential areas.
3. Adopt the zoning map change resolution (Attachment 23). This resolution
changes the zoning nn8p for the newly subdivided 1.54 acre vv8sLRrn |0t (Parcel
A) on the vacant lot located on the northeast corner Of Beam and White Bear
Avenues from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial
BC). The city iS making this change because:
8. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent 0f
the zoning code.
b. The proposed change will not sUbatonU8|k/ injure or detract from the use
f neighboring pn]p8rtvVrfr0nnthe character Vf the neighborhood and the
use O| the property adjacent tO the area included iO the proposed change
or plan is adequately safeguarded.
C. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
d. The proposed change would have Do negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such
as public water, sewers, police and fire protection, and schools.
4. Approve the plans date-stamped October 2, 2005 for the VV8|AreenS retail store
and drive-through pharmacy t0be located On the northeast corner 0f Beam and
White Bear Avenues. Approval iS subject h] the applicant doing the following:
is
3. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued o building permit
for this project.
b. Prior to iSsuGDC8 of grading or building permit, the applicant must
submit to staff for approval the following items:
1\ Revsedgradino/dneinaoe/ub|hty plans which comply with all city
engineering department requirements 88 specified inthe
November 20.20O0. engineering report including, but not limited
to, the granting 0fo[ight-Of-vv8y easement along White Bear
Avenue and the submittal of8n escrow L0the city b}ensure
construction of six-foot-wide sidewalk along the entire length Of
Beam Avenue tobe complete by the city in2OU8.
2) Revised site plan showing 8Six-hJot-wde sidewalk extending the
entire length Of Parcel A and Parcel B along Beam Avenue and 8
bike rack to be located near the building entrance.
3) Revised landscape plan showing the following:
e\ Twenty more shrubs and forty perennial plants t0bR
planted along Beam and White Bear Avenues.
N Re-establishment of any disturbed land onParcel B with
sod or native prairie grasses
4\ Revised elevations osfollows: south and west -windows
constructed two feet from the sidewalk with the bottom half ofthe
window (portion of the vvind0vv two feet from sidewalk t0 top of
door elevation) shall be spandrel glass with vision glass above;
aemt — drivo-thnouQhotandinganonnnooftobo|inemrine|evoUon
rather than gabled. |n addition, show all elevations with proposed
roof-top equipment t0 verify that the roof equipment will not extend
beyond the parapet walls.
5) A revised lighting and photometrio3 plan which shows that the
overall illumination from outdoor lights does not exceed .4-foot-
candles
G) Obtain a permit from Ramsey County for construction on county
right-of-way for the driveway access, utility work, and sidewalk.
7) Watershed district approval if revisions warrant a new review.
H) A cash escrow or8n irrevocable letter Of credit for all required
exterior improvements. The amount shall be150 percent ofthe
oOSt of the work.
C. Si nogS0ntheprOp8dviSp8rt0fthedeSiQDrSvievv8ppr0v8|@ndiS
subject to the following sign criteria:
11
1\ One freestanding sign b}bR located on the corner of Beam and
White Bear Avenue. Freestanding sign LObe8rnaxnnVnnCf15
feet in height, 68 square feet in area, maintain 818-foCt setback to
all pnJp8dv lines and comply with traffic visibility r8qUirS[nSDtS.
2) Two VV8|or8ens wall signs [Ob8 located on the south and west
elevation. Signs to be constructed of individual letters with a
nlaninnVnl letter height of two feet and must be centered within the
nnanUf8{tUn]U limestone facade.
3) Two one-hour photo signs and two pharmacy signs bJbelocated
on the south and west elevation. Signs hobe constructed of
individual letters with o nnoxinnUnn letter height of 1.5 feet, and
must be centered within the manufactured limestone piers, above
the windows.
4) One drive-through pharmacy directional sign tob8 located above
the standing 3eonn nnRto| roof on the south elevation. Sign to be
constructed of individual letters with o nn8xinnunn letter height of
1.5 feet.
50 One interior entrance tower neon sign, 22SqV8nef88Lin8rR8.
d. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
1\ Replace any property irons removed because Vf this construction.
2) Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking
lot and driveways.
3\ Install all required landscaping and underground irrigation.
4\ Screen the rooftop mechanical equipment.
5) Install all required outdoor lighting.
e. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy
if:
1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety orwelfare.
2) The above-required letter Vfcredit or cash esCn}vv i8 held by the
City VfMaplewood for all required exterior improvements. The
owner Or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior
innprOv8nn8nLs by June 1 if occupancy of the building is in the t8||
or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if
occupancy i3in the spring orsummer.
All vv0rh ah8U follow the approved o|GDS. The director Ofcommunity
development may approve minor changes.
ivi
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 2.83 Acres
Existing Use: V8C@ntLoDd
i-ill V
North: K48p|8vvo0d East Shopping Center BC)
South: Beam Avenue and Premier Bank across the street (Zoned LBC)
East: Maplewood Heights Park
West: White Bear Avenue and Red Lobster across the street (Zoned BC)
Existing Land Use
Designation:Limited Business Cornmenci8|/LB{|\
Existing Zoning:Limited Business Commercial (LBC)
Proposed Land Use
Designation:Business CVnnnn8rCia| (BC)
Proposed Zoning:Business Commercial (BC)
Criteria for CUP Approval
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Land Use Plan Change: There are mJ specific criteria for land use plan changes. Any
change, however, should be consistent with the goals and policies in the comprehensive
Section 44-1165 of the city code requires that the city council make the following findings
to rezone property:
The proposed change iS consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent Ofthe
zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure ordetuactfnomtheu3eof
neighboring property Vr from the character Uf the neighborhood and the use Uf
the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is
adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences ofthe
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,
and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water,
SRvv8rS. police and fire protection, and schools.
13
Design Review
Section 2-29ODfthe city code requires that the community design review board make
the following findings to approve plans:
That the design and location 0f the proposed development and its relationship [
neighboring, existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not
impair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that iLwill
not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or
proposed developments; and that it will not create traffic hazards 0[congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development isin keeping with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood and i3 not detrimental hothe
harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and
the city's comprehensive [nuOiCip@| plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide 8
desirable environment for its occupants, oa well 3s for its neighbors, 8ndthotbiS
aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and colors.
Application Date
The city received the complete application and plans for this proposal on October 18.
2008. State |8vv requires that the city take action within 00 days of receiving complete
applications for @proposal. City council action ia required OD this proposal by
December 1O unless the applicant agrees tOG time extension.
mmns\2008pmpoaaK11'28'00CD03
Attachments:
1. Applicants' Development Statement
2. Applicants' Rezoning Statement
3. Land Use Map
4. Zoning Map
5. Location Map
0. Lot Division Map
7. Existing Conditions
8. Site Plan
0. Grading Plan
10. Drainage and Storm Sewer
11. Utility Plan
12. Pavement Plan
13. Lighting Plan
14. Landscape Plan
15. 3tonnwuharPoUudon Prevention Plan
10. Floor Plan
17. Bui|dingBmvaiionm - VVestendSouth
10. Bui|dingBovuiinna - EaniandNorth
19. Monument Sign Elevation
20. Wall Sign Elevations
21. Engineering Plan Review (11-20-O8)
22. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Change Resolution
23. Zoning Map Change Resolution
24. November 2O.2000. Planning Commission Minutes
25. November 28.2UO6.CDRBMinutes
us
Attachment I
PROPOSED WALGREENS PHARMACY
NORTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE BEAR AVENUE AND BEAM
This project was reviewed one year ago in combination with a proposed bank project to
be located on property to the east of this site. This project is no longer a part of the bank
project and is presented as a stand alone Walgreens Pharmacy on its own lot. The
previous ground lease on the proposed Walgreens property is being modified to a
purchase of the land.
The site plan is similar to the one reviewed a year ago. This plan is based on a shared
access with the property to the north and a shared access drive on both the north and east
sides of this site. The shared access location on White Bear Avenue will allow for the
removal of an existing access point to White Bear Ave. currently located to the south of
the shared drive location. This shared access drive will include easements for both access
and utilities for the properties on each side of the easement.
The additional 10 feet of right of way requested along White Bear Avenue is being
accommodated with this new plan submittal and can be seen on sheet 3 of 14 as noted on
the west side of the plan.
The building design was also revised with respect to the previous Design Review Board
comments from the meeting held on July 26, 2005. The southwest comer of the building
has been redesigned in both layout and materials. This area of the project is the most
prominent element addressing the intersection of White Bear Avenue and Beam. The
previous design represented the typical Walgreens building. This new design has squared
up the entry tower into an element of its own. By combining this with a change in the
materials we have also been able to break up the elevations on both the south and west
sides of the project. We have also brought the entry tower forward, over the sidewalk,
thus breaking the straight building plane with the new tower layout. To add to the
prominence of the comer we have added to the height of the tower to add a greater visual
separation to this element.
In this submittal of the previously reviewed project we have tried to take into account all
of the previous comments the Design Review Board presented including those comments
that were unobtainable at the time of the last meeting.
Attachment 2
PROPOSED WALGREENS PHARMACY — REZONING
WHITE BEAR AVENUE AND BEAM AVENUE
We are proposing to develop a Walgreens Pharmacy on the northeast corner of White
Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue. This rezoning proposal includes only the corner
property for the Walgreens. The zoning change we are requesting is a change from the
existing Limited Business Commercial to Business Commercial. This zoning matches
the zoning on the properties directly to the north and west of our site.
The site plan being proposed has been changed from a similar plan you were presented
nearly a year ago. This proposal no longer includes the property to the east in the
rezoning. We have also worked with the property owner of the center to the north in the
areas of cross access and utility easements that will be shared by both properties. These
changes have allowed the plan to accommodate the requested 10 feet of additional right
of way for the future expansion of White Bear Avenue and the elimination of an existing
curb cut to White Bear Avenue. These changes will aid in the future traffic
improvements along White Bear Avenue.
The Walgreens Pharmacy will serve an area that extends out 12 to 18 blocks from the
store. This is very much a neighborhood store. The primary users of this store are the
people that live in the neighborhood and thus very little additional traffic is brought to the
area by this project. In addition to this, the typical traffic coming and going from a
neighborhood pharmacy is a trickle of cars throughout the day. It does not operate like
many other commercial uses with a rush of traffic coming at certain times of the day.
This is a very friendly neighborhood use that will fit very well into the neighborhood of
White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue.
Attachment 3
E Land Use Map
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
I ocation Map
Fj
Q—CQ)
ID
E
L00 L
LliL
tJ +I
00 Ada
co d
U')
Z
o
NOO' ; y
224,96'
2 -1
NO"o 40 HiON
5
jI
Fj
Q—CQ)
ID
E
L00 L
LliL
tJ +I
00 Ada
co d
U')
9
2 0
W
z
a
o
wpw
0J s
A
o
NOO' ; y
224,96'
2 -1 5
Z
LL
ni ui U)Lij
C) +I
CL
ro
g
c
6Z - -L6C — N R Ab'f
L 6t L
J, C,9
inNAAV 8V39 311HM
9
2 0
W
z
a
o
wpw
0J s
A
z < IN
N
90NIM'J@ x] 3 fo
o. ow =<a _ o4f/Aw — 40 QO
c
O ocLLwioo~ o v,m oci I, y ,
mow¢ o
o, ooQO aom - I •o l l I"
v \
z a
am °o N - - - -
z-,I— s -i00 Z i 0 Ow0 O q pifl j Z z wzK3ow4 ¢
Q a ¢ZO6 ¢U Zg w-"0 w '
wry
W o wao oom O N azoaw <.a _ o o H IWp40
W I IonWr >> cc o m v L : m y ' W
bl
W a
xI i
Q ZZ
ii ¢
w I
O w N30 QZwa Ow O I _I O „
wz o °
I
s
i
R
C a-P
xw _ - _ _ "..r.,..^
9Z)I
I _a
Y -
I l cssr M
I mIo oQ°w _
O 03F
F. 00.E Oy¢O7z x
wvr zozcn
o _
o
O
wwwaN, m 2
W
O 3 O s
w
H x z VF
w
JL
w
xl
w:
y I 1
nQ a
w
ow
rc !
I o
rzw
e
w
G
rn,(11r 7 . ; lL,7WR-
31 X1 z NF%S_L IXwr I ...w
M LLO 4 c> w.
Q rn w
o 3 1 \ xI tt
I
d
w w _aa p
wov
of a o Jz Y O
s jr
z
u z
a vE V, in wa r 3 N c o w z' d C Z
z wza i`pO
z c
I 4 wo zv, s '^> mo _ o Z a xa wwwrnEyvowEnvsZofK
w
N
O Ill
OZ S w N om xIf
W O = QQ p_ 1- cn O D Z 44II g } ry 2 •
W
K K 1 O
a 0 a oa a o
a o Za z p Qo oa
m
o w Z v Z
a
ZIT Ono 'a oa o a t
axwd
Y <m
it
S J Sa
Mw
N
Z
w
nna
40 n
C`5
e.
E
I w
V 6 FI I
y
Lj
In
v w
0 0
a
I
J I
o
o 0
I
I
t iE
r
w
m m
N
y
o
m
E w
r
c I
t I
a R719m
i
moo (
y et
o oW WJ w a , o ° o z a z _
IxzzW
w
NN W ° 6 tn 0ZKFY % Z
o
m 2v
Sz
IW-ioz o0 oN Nair z - =W c c' - n zzw zWla o a amw a " ms m I
ZOWtzJ ZOZ¢ 30 ZZQw QO OaNO OQ :V }
O
cr 2w w w . x <OW 11
ZOpZ 2N w
Q Z
z ' , w z
c
a
9
iii zmn
w
ryFI WICL
x
jr
B to +
2 ° m eR i I
x V° M
x m Zb ". wi
m a00
za a O 8
Q
4
a
O
o.
V
O
0
o
w Q
I
w
940 "` g39 g38
J
m
x
x w" D03 x] °
w
0 0
o
wawOoooMMwwop
a F iii uj
I,d 'r
Q
o
w m
r
wwmw lb I
c o
v
I
m
w w w w w
W`11 rJ X3 3j
a
J`w o
zz i
a0 p
y
mV mV j
z
ZzItr
Q OD
wp4
z w z z z w
Q>
JOOOQ
o z rc1zqJwozoVOc't?wmN NZ GC+w'VV V in I
q =sooWO o
OOUZ a 4z
00 a <mw
O W
w
jw
9 w
H W w
a x w a
N
tR2 { g2 B p f ay
area _ I
cv
r
p 4
w _
og
w m>
ica-
z
ry
j `.3
A
lz
1 n M
r i ,In
I
to
IT
C
1
nN
i
r
7 `7,b'
x /i
II
x
7
s >
r
aNOtiao x+ x z n . z
w
o
a F iii uj
I,d 'r
Q9w
H W w
a x w a
N
tR2 { g2 B p f ay
area _ I
cv
r
p 4
w _
og
w m>
ica-
z
ry
j `.3
A
lz
1 n M
r i ,In
I
to
IT
C
1
nN
i
r
7 `7,b'
x /i
II
x
7
s >
r
aNOtiao x+ x z n . z
0
a °o =w >
wa °
u"O s
Z
poZ v QQ 6o
a
ZOZ°4° O{aO cairn OiO =4 O aVO i -5N ¢OO 20Ed
z
40 Ow mJww ?O Wc
NZOYO
O 4s 4 Na z vN } z OO Om Iz °Na0
o 8
W ¢ mwz FNO z .n Lowy o aQOO o
W Cn ¢ ~mU x~O y0
O NppW = O S o0 FNZ QOOQZ 3Uw 3pN
J °a' °-< 3 - ° O <aso <om zoo z
a ° wo z z `il z
d p w °x o a>z ow^
W OI=ON z WO UwO O dOi'- 1 -F 82 1 0 1
I w
N
a
V 1 FZIImo IaZsaox
p
w
a o > _
G r i 4
ZN I mOont
Z W
l
a
U
f
z
g o
Old,
8„m m a N i
w m m
5 H
s ohM ER
1 . 7
I
d aixnaaw.am zsuYo9'ae3:BdsE !flat w.s -iwcz ... '
n
r I —a—I
x
p(w 3
z
IJ f
x
M
z
x
m
T
r
a w gn
frc
w3z I r x
i
ti
I
n
i
aovrarxnaMas•xd.. -mac $It
s
v
m "°.x a Ri'1'903d aS4 y
Nc Je r
i
13FSNYJ %3
l?l;r;r1 [Qr t r[er,7 Z7UHA 8
N s,.-[xA NHS.,Z [XI
LL 171 1
z30q J yQ a J jdii EmavYY w m h n
II
t Z W
W (nw JO Zyaa °WSZ OF wqK .d1 -Q d .SS o
lL cn (JN "ECO Q w W
d QQ
W ZZ
p' mzio zo o No
w W W O
W CL
U nl o N
cp z
i pp um
1w
a
i o v _,.
i
s.
i
i 1 O- d iy0'1 IWJ18Yd #aMIYYLiN
r
gy, C
wil f
1
I .
U z0ww4
Z
wN3 00 UZ jM
W Z
o?x
o.r -E-4-II CL
Fina O
WoOlqNN ZO
WOhm US ZCaJ
pq
z30q J yQ a J jdii EmavYY w m h n
II
t Z W
W (nw JO Zyaa °WSZ OF wqK .d1 -Q d .SS o
lL cn (JN "ECO Q w W
d QQ
W ZZ
p' mzio zo o No
w W W O
W CL
U nl o N
cp z
i pp um
1w
a
i o v _,.
i
s.
i
i 1 O- d iy0'1 IWJ18Yd #aMIYYLiN
r
gy, C
wil f
1
I .
A P
Fm
C
C
f
F R
G
W o
A P
P P
a P
P P
P P a
P e P
P P ? P G A P P P $ P # G P P
P P e P A P P P P e A P P P
P P P P P P R P P
r ePPPPPPPRPPP e P P
5
EL
x
v
U
Ja
Oo p?a
O WO
J d
wU2
v zFJ
Eq
NP oav
R
QQ
LJ
cfl P e
Z
N o N M e A
F N
P P P
e P P
N d n P P
Y
P e P P
2 w
2"z
O
Z sCW Q
q N O 4 Q
V
C7 0o w o0 xS xN
a G
Z
VVQ
K K VOw2w
f
F R N LLI
Q
QdW H
OJ
Q 2Ul
Q
Wm 3
U F O`J
Q = W Q
W o
A P
P P
a P
P P
G P
e a
P P a
P e P
P P ? P G A P P P $ P # G P P
P P e P A P P P P e A P P P
P P P P P P R P P
r ePPPPPPPRPPP e P P
5
EL
Zv
U
Ja
Oo p?a
O WO
J d
wU2
v zFJ
Eq
NP oav
R
N LLI
Q
QdW H
OJ
Q 2Ul
Q
Wm 3
U F O`J
Q = W Q
i
P £+ P R
P P e
P A a P m
a 4
A P
P P
a P
P P
G P
e a
P P a
P e P
P P ? P G A P P P $ P # G P P
P P e P A P P P P e A P P P
P P P P P P R P P
r ePPPPPPPRPPP e P P
m r t4-P P P P
i
P £+ P R
P P e
P A a P m
a 4
o .......
f
t"
m r t4-P P P P
R
QQ
LJ
cfl P e
Z
N o N M e A
F N
P P P
e P P
N d n P P
P e P P
i
P £+ P R
P P e
P A a P m
a 4
o .......
f
z
R =m NoUJ
J J
R
Q3 o,
U4
C M-1
0
a OON
O
o
QU
o =i
z
WJ
O
WZ
U
Cn
Z
g
3¢ZKZ
V EEc ci v
w
WO Wma°dw w
O m m m O
w
i N
a
ozWw >
a
Boa O ¢ o aZ
w
W
z
W °
m z
v
E
Z wo N o0dr
o
Q
3
N
zN
oNm
od zpooo
a sQp
zags o
ow
o
z j¢
oM
U
3
zo
oQ
K
w
d0N
a mo
z
w
WO Wma°dw w
QSoVo oO W
U) x
o o w
n
Q g 6 W w o
m i N
a
ozWw >
a
Boa O ¢ o aZ Q m aZo _
m z<
W °
m z
o
m Z wo N o0draoJQN
tio
Z °a sQpQwoa
a
gym 2
x
o 3S
h
I
I r,
I
I 3
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
it I e
C
I IJ
I
I
I,
I
i
0
I a
I I
I u
C i.
I
I ( i
I r ,
v
c
0
0
O
O Z<
0
Z a
W V _Z
w
N
U
op
o n o
m ?-, 1J' +U2R !'. I Z- v, iii KJS I.iP/M
w
w 'o
N
J
ZE
UCO w
4 a
J
W Q
m ~O
Q Z
2
Q a
mJ3
H I w
E = w Q
o O
0 N
8 Q
nc
hog
QR
tz
Z
x r
x
II
o no
m ?-, 1J' +U2R !'. I Z- v, iii KJS I.iP/M
w
w 'o
N
J
ZE
UCO w
4 a
J
W Q
m ~O
Q Z
2
Q a
mJ3
H I w
E = w Q
o O
0 N
8 Q
nc
hog
QR
tz
Z
G
Q w O
O
wOCn N m ww
l
a o r _ Z
O E-4
1 ^
m a
wV ¢Ip
o
w Q N m Z
o ¢4Samwzw
ww wow.N aY aa
F Z Wa 4
cn
m ir o
o o
Z°
n ro
woaoNoUJ tizr -o zcWiso ¢y°,i <w x ®zaa
o NIVI;, i;Nl,M1 illf3 XJ
F
w
o aNa
O.- ow yg 2 w
w
Ja OONZa U o w
a,
Zp6 ~iwOww¢ O J ° Q
z°Z aw
J powOoo 000zwo s oa
a U• rv,a ° °a o . wiz wz
wU CL 2w OQZQQcr
N W
O b
w whoa wmF (/J EC4Jw N Opw o ,y gouFwo¢ °C5 Na W
m
I
ca
o C
umm
a
Att 3
sF .. ......... . .SE SF....a
m80z
I u-
o
32i 'NO' J t:
1
l
1 ^
m a
cn
m ir o
o o
F
woz
a,
i
r
WW p
O
zOFz o
Jaa
ZO
W O
W W
a OmaO
LLj
Q
m O
z w
a zZ_
cl
cl
J PE I wwaT
z
0
q v to
W z
w
A ", bONO:,
SE
l
w
A ", bONO:,
SE
m,
WaISIreens 14900 Osth Assam Natul
p {'
Maple Orove, Minnesota 55360
t
I
q y. --.
m
1
I1 1I '
I1 1I=
t
l °
1I v
L4
a
4
1 .
4 -4
l "
t «
yJ I
tx i
y
0
v
0
111
v "t
V
t
0
OF ---Proposed New Building for-
WaISIreens 14900 Osth Assam Natul
Maple Orove, Minnesota 55360
Proposed
P IM N 1 Building q w i
rr
55369
Proposed New Building for-
mail
WaISIreens 14900 Osth Assam Natul
Maple Orove, Minnesota 55360
8'-9"
0
3
it (D
s
MM - - - - z > a:
D 0 >
M z
z ;0 0 G)
5'
M >
M
M 0 00
M >
V7
O a ®
0- 'D OT
M W
0 CC0 ® =3 CD CD 3 (D0 (a CL N 0
5 (D (D p-
0 0. - 0. '< P '7
r CD r- :5 '=n7 =7 (D
0 CD (D CD
D
0 CD (D
CD ( n F 3 M 0
E
CD "0
D CD P
NCD
Proposed New Building for: Robert F. Brunjes AIA CIDSEERLLC
Architect (DWalgreens1180095thAvenueNorth2655EighthAvenueEast
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 a,
White Boar Ave. & Beam Ave., Maplewood 763-425-2542 651-770-7635
0 El 0
zMI I 5E P
1 TflM
NM
n
gz >M V,
0 >M p Z -z
DmmS
z pzIp z z
1z ra
ZMz
m m
zz MM
p, 'MIK MmzAp0
PE r
zz
z
mfl72 > INI >
El D
m m
z -9 z
T
z
4
z'Z
6
Az
00 00 0 CD
201 Pm
T '0z .
m m. Azz >
m.
M 6C 2 t
z
H 2o 4 *
z z '0 z
M 00
0
Mx z
z. 0
z
lo z
M
0z C'
M 0 0z
a
8 MM
M
M
I *
z
Z
M
0
Z
z 0yo `
L
0-0 x M
H,m
00 0
39 z
H .151 >
Proposed New Building for: MEER LLC Robert F. Brunjes AIA CID
Architect (DWalgreens1180095thAvenueNorth2655EighthAvenueEast
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 a,
White Boar Ave. & Beam Ave., Maplewood 763-425-2542 651-770-7635
Attachment 21
Engineering Plan Review
PROJECT: Walgreens
PROJECT NO:
REVIEWED PV: Erin Laberee, Maplewood Engineering Department
DATE: November 20, 2006
Semper Development is proposing to develop the lot at the northeast corner of White
Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue into a Walgreen's store. The lot is currently vacant.
Drainage from the site would be directed into the existing storm sewer on Beam Avenue.
Runoff would be treated with a treatment structure. The following issues shall be
address.
Drainage
1. A maintenance agreement outlining annual maintenance procedures will be
required for the proposed treatment structure and any other best management
practices.
2. The engineer and developer shall add additional best management practices to
infiltrate F of runoff from the impervious area of the site. Rainwater gardens
and/or an infiltration trench would be ideal on the west side of the site between
the sidewalk and the parking lot. The engineer shall verify that the existing soils
are conducive to infiltration otherwise a subsurface drainage system shall be
utilized.
3. The engineer shall submit sizing calculations for the inline separation unit.
4. Submit plans to Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed for their review.
ITtilities
1. Submit plans to SPRWS for their review.
2. Submit plans to Ramsey County for their review.
Miscellaneons
White Bear Avenue is scheduled for reconstruction in 2008. The intersection at
Beam Avenue will also be affected. In lieu of constructing a sidewalk along Beam
Avenue now, the developer shall post an equivalent dollar amount to the city for
this work to be done in 2008. The developer shall also grant to the city a
construction easement for this work.
2. The developer shall enter into a developer's agreement for the right of way
easement along White Bear Avenue and the construction easement and sidewalk
along Beam Avenue.
3. The developer shall ensure that the proposed trees along White Bear Avenue do
not encroach into the new right of way. It is recommended to shift the trees a few
feet to the east to avoid any potential conflicts.
Attachment 22
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, 88nnper Development, representing VV8|or8ens applied for a
change to the city's comprehensive land use plan from Limited Business Commercial
LBC\tO Business Commercial (BC).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the west 253 feet of the vacant property
located 0O the northeast corner Of Beam and White Bear Avenues (Parcel Aos
described in the October 5,2O08,Lot Split Boundary ExhibiU.
WHEREAS, the property identification number for the property is 02-29-22-24-
WHEREAS, the legal description of Parcel A is as fd|ovvG:
That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 2. Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of the
center line [f White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described asfollows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 2. Township 29. Range 22. said point being 175 feet Northerly of
the South line 0f said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 550.5 feet along the East
line; thence 354.5 feet due West; thence 350 feet due South; thence in a Southeasterly
direction tV8 point which is 120 feet due West Vf the point Vf beginning; thence
Northwesterly along last said line 10S.75 feet t0 the north line 0f the said South
2R4.98 feet; thence along last said north line, South H9 degrees 19 minutes 05seconds
West G distance Cf94.Y3 feet; thence deflecting left 8O degrees, South 0O degrees 40
minutes 55 seconds East o distance of284.Q0 feet b}the east / west quarter line 0f
said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 89 degrees 19 minutes
05 seconds East to the center Vf said Section 2; thence northerly along the East line Vf
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter Of said Section 2@ distance Of175.0O
feet to the point ofbeginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof,
Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject to the right of way for Beam Avenue and White
Bear Avenue and encumbrances as shown on an ALTA survey prepared by Houston
Engineering dated March 24.2000. Containing approximately 6Y.U13 square feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
On November 20.2000. the planning commission held 8 public hearing. The city
staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone 8tthe
hearing o chance t0 speak and present written statements prior t0their
PSC0QDOlBnd8tiUn.
2. [)n December 11.2UOS, the city council discussed the land use plan change.
They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission
and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|T RESOLVED that the city council approved the
above-described change bJ the land use plan for the following reasons:
Provide for orderly development.
2. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods.
3. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax b8G9 increase
jobs and provide desirable services.
4. Minimize the |8nU planned for streets.
5. Minimize conflicts between land uses.
6. Prevent premature use, overcrowding, 0roveruse of land especially vvh8n
supportive services and facilities, such as utilities, drainage systems, or streets
are not available.
7. Help to implement the gOo|S of the comprehensive p|8D including:
a\ The city will not approve new development without providing for adequate
facilities and services, such as street, utilities, drainage, parks, and open
space.
b\ Safe and adequate access will b8 provided for all properties.
C) Tr8nSbk)nS between distinctly differing types of land uses should not
create aneg8tiwe economic, social, or physical impact on adjoining
d\ Whenever possible, changes in types Of land use should occur sothat
similar uses front On the same street OrGL borders of areas separated bv
major man-made or natural barriers.
8\ The city coordinates land use changes with the character 0feach
f) Group compatible businesses in suitable areas.
g) Avoid disruption of adjacent or nearby residential areas.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on December 11
2
Attachment 23
WHEREAS, Se0pSr Development, rBpr8SSOOg WalgreenS for
change k) the city's zoning map from Limited Business Commercial /LBC\LOBusiness
Cornrnen:i8| (B{}).
WHEREAS, this change applies LO the west 253 feet Of the vacant property
located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues (Parcel A as
described in the October 5.20O8. Lot Split Boundary Exhibit).
WHEREAS, the property identification number for the property is 02-29-22-24-
WHEREAS, the legal description for Parcel AiS8Sfollows:
That part of the South 284.96 feet of the South 731.5 feet of the Southeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 22 lying East of the
center line Vf White Bear Avenue, Except the part thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter 0f Section 2 Township 28 Range 22 said point being 175 feet Northerly 0f
the South line Of said Southeast Quarter; thence Northerly 550.5 feet along the East
line; thence 354.5 feet due West; thence 35O feet due South; thence in8Southeasterly
direction to point which is 12U feet due West ofthe point ofbeginning; thence
Northwesterly along last said line 166.75 feet to the north line of the said South
284.S8 feet; thence along last said north line, South 8O degrees 19 minutes 05seconds
West 8 distance Df84.73 feet; thence deflecting left 9O degrees, South 00 degrees 4O
minutes 55 seconds East Gdistance of284.90 feet to the east / west quarter line of
said Section 2; thence along said east /west quarter line, North 88 degrees 19minutes
05 seconds East b} the center 0f said Section 2; thence northerly along the East line 0f
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 2 a distance of 175.00
feet to the point 0fbeginning; according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof,
Ramsey County, Minnesota. Subject t0 the right 0f way for Beam Avenue and White
Bear Avenue and encumbrances 8s shown on8nALTA survey prepared byHouston
Engineering dated March 24, 2006. Containing approximately 67,013 square feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
n November 2O.20O0. the planning commission held 8 public hearing. The city
staff published 8 hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone otthe
hearing a chance tV speak and present written statements prior tOtheir
recommendation.
2. On December 11.2000, the city council discussed the land use plan change.
They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission
and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE|7 RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-
described
The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent ofthe
zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure 0rdStnaCtfrountheuS80f
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use
of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is
adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences ofthe
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,
and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water,
Gevv8r8. police and fine protection, and schools.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution On December 11.2OU6.
K
Attachment 24
DRAFT
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 20,2006
a. Walgreens (Northeast Corner of White Bear and Beam Avenues) (7:22-7:42 p.m.)
Mr. Roberts said Semper Development, representing Mogren Landscaping and Walgreens, is
proposing to construct a 14,820-square-foot Walgreens retail store with a drive-through pharmacy
on a vacant lot located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues. The proposal
includes subdividing the 2.83-acre lot into two lots. The western lot will be sold to Semper
Development for the development of the proposed Walgreens and the eastern lot will be retained
by the Maplewood Financial Center (Premier Bank) for future development.
The property is zoned and guided in the city's comprehensive plan as Limited Business
Commercial (LBC), which allows for offices, medical or health-related clinics, day care centers, or
similar uses. In order to operate a retail store and pharmacy from the newly subdivided western
lot, the proposal also includes a request for a comprehensive land use plan and zoning change to
Business Commercial (BC).
Commissioner Trippler said the city is asking the applicant to set aside escrow money to construct
the sidewalks in the near future because White Bear Avenue is going to be expanded.
Mr. Roberts said that is correct.
Erin Laberee, Maplewood Assistant City Engineer, addressed the commission. She said White
Bear Avenue is planned for improvements in 2008. Those improvements would also affect Beam
Avenue and the city is looking at reconfiguring the sidewalk. Therefore, it didn't make sense to
require the applicant to install the sidewalk and then tear it out for the White Bear Avenue
improvements only to replace the sidewalk again. The city would request the applicant to post
escrow for the future building of the sidewalk when the road improvements are done.
Commissioner Trippler said the plans show the crowns of the trees overlapping the ten foot
expansion of White Bear Avenue, wouldn't it make more sense to move the trees over because if
you plant them and they cut in underneath the crown of the tree that would kill the trees.
Ms. Laberee said Dan Soler with Ramsey County called her today with the same concern. That is
in the Ramsey County right-of-way and to eliminate the impact on the trees in the right-of-way
staff will add that recommendation to the comments.
Commissioner Hess asked if the applicant considered relocating the trash compactors to the west
side of the property so they wouldn't be as visible and unsightly from White Bear Avenue.
Mr. Roberts said because of the drive aisle and the parking lot configuration there may not be
enough room to do that. With the truck deliveries and the drive pattern that may cause a problem
entering and exiting the site, but the applicant could elaborate on that.
Commissioner Desai said he read a comment that traffic would not be a factor here but this is a
very busy intersection and these are busy streets in both directions. He asked if a traffic study had
been done showing this proposal isn't going to affect traffic in the area?
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 11 -20 -06
Mr. Roberts said he isn't aware of any traffic studies that have been. Staff realizes this area is
scheduled to be upgraded by Ramsey County and Maplewood. Hopefully the two entities working
together won't create additional traffic problems.
Commissioner Hess said a CVS Pharmacy was just built on White Bear Avenue and County Road
B East and there is a Walgreen's in the strip mail by Rainbow Foods. Why are so many
drugstores being built in such close proximity?
Mr. Roberts said staff understands this Walgreen's proposal would replace the older Walgreen's
store in the strip mall by Rainbow Foods. Staff understands Walgreen's wants their stores to be
freestanding and have a drive-thru window for the convenience of their customer's. Apparently
Walgreen's and CVS Pharmacy try to build their stores close to each other because they are
competing against each other.
Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the commission.
Mr. John Kohler, Architect, Semper Development, addressed the commission. He said the trash
collection area is in a brick enclosure which would face away from White Bear Avenue. There is
also going to be landscaping and trees around the brick enclosure so it would be well screened
and not very visible. Depending on which street you are driving on you wouldn't see the trash
enclosure very well anyway. The reason trash enclosure is located there is for traffic circulation
and truck deliveries. He said they have been working with Dan Soler with Ramsey County
regarding removing one of the curb cuts and combining the curb cuts to improve the traffic in the
area. The site was designed to accommodate the expansion of White Bear and Beam Avenues.
As far as the number of Walgreen's stores and how close they are located, the corporate office
used to figure on one Walgreen's store every 4 miles, now Walgreen's wants to serve customers
within a 1 mile area. Walgreen's finds with a good density population this is how far they would
like their stores spaced apart in order to fit the customers' needs.
Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant if they had any issues with the recommendations in the
staff report?
Mr. Kohler said they had no issues or problems with the staff report.
Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Trippler moved to approve the lot split boundary exhibit date stamped October 5,
2006, for a lot division request to subdivide the 2.83-acre lot located on the northeast corner of
Beam and White Bear Avenues into two lots. Lot division approval is based on code requirements
Section 34-14 — lot divisions) and is subject to the following:
a. Submit a revised survey to staff for approval which shows the following:
1) Legal descriptions of Parcels A and B.
2) Location and legal description of utility and access easement on the east side of Parcel
A to accommodate utilities and access for the property to the north (2950 White Bear
Avenue) and access for the property to the east (Parcel B).
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 11 -20 -06
3) Location and legal description of access easement on the north side of Parcel A and the
south side of the property to the north (2950 White Bear Avenue) to accommodate the
drive-through lane located on the north side of the Walgreen's building on Parcel A and
the shared driveway on White Bear Avenue.
4) Location and legal description of ten-foot-wide roadway easement along White Bear
Avenue the entire length of Parcel A to accommodate for future roadway widening.
b. Deeds describing the two new legal descriptions for Parcels A and B, including the required
utility, access, and roadway easement descriptions described above.
c. Deeds must be recorded with Ramsey County within one year of the date of lot division
approval or the lot division will become null and void (city code requirement).
d. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit for the proposed Walgreens retail store and
pharmacy on Parcel A, the following must be submitted to staff for approval:
1) Proof that Ramsey County has recorded the deeds.
2)A signed certificate of survey for Parcel A showing the location of all property lines,
building, parking, driveway, freestanding sign, and easements.
Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the comprehensive land use plan change resolution
Attachment 22). This resolution changes the comprehensive land use plan map for the newly
subdivided 1.54 acre western lot (Parcel A) on the vacant lot located on the northeast corner of
Beam and White Bear Avenues from Limited Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial
BC). The city is making this change because it will:
a. Provide for orderly development.
b. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods.
c. Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase jobs and
provide desirable services.
d. Minimize the land planned for streets.
e. Minimize conflicts between land uses.
Prevent premature use, overcrowding, or overuse of land especially when supportive services
and facilities, such as utilities, drainage systems, or streets are not available.
g. Help to implement the goals of the comprehensive plan including:
1 The city will not approve new development without providing for adequate facilities and
services, such as street, utilities, drainage, parks and open space.
2) Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 11 -20 -06
3) Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative
economic, social, or physical impact on adjoining developments.
4) Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front
on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural
barriers.
5) The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood.
6) Group compatible businesses in suitable areas.
7) Promote the joint use of parking areas, drives and trash containers.
Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the zoning map change resolution (Attachment 23). This
resolution changes the zoning map for the newly subdivided 1.54 acre western lot (Parcel A) on
the vacant lot located on the northeast corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues from Limited
Business Commercial (LBC) to Business Commercial (BC). The city is making this change
because:
a. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
b. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood and the use of the property adjacent
to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
C. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and the public welfare.
d. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers,
police and fire protection, and schools.
Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes — Desai, Dierich, Fischer, Grover, Hess,
Pearson, Trippler, Yarwood
figmc• • 0 ,_Ml
This item goes to the city council on December 11, 2006.
Commissioner Hess said he noticed an error on attachment 21 of the engineering plan review in
the first sentence, it states the northwest corner rather than the northeast corner.
Mr. Roberts said the engineering staff will make that correction.
Attachment 25
WQM
9EEKf
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28,2006
a. Walgreens — Northeast Corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues
Ms. Finwall said Semper Development, representing Mogren Landscaping and
Walgreens, is proposing to construct a 14,738-square-foot Walgreens retail store with a
drive-through pharmacy on a vacant lot located on the northeast corner of Beam and
White Bear Avenues. The proposal includes subdividing the 2.83-acre lot into two lots.
The western lot will be sold to Semper Development for the development of the
proposed Walgreens and the eastern lot will be retained by the Maplewood Financial
Center (Premier Bank) for future development.
The property is zoned and guided in the city's comprehensive plan as Limited Business
Commercial (LBC), which allows for offices, medical or health-related clinics, day care
centers, or similar uses. In order to operate a retail store and pharmacy from the newly
subdivided western lot, the proposal also includes a request for a comprehensive land
use plan and zoning change to Business Commercial (BC).
The planning commission recommended approval of the lot division, comprehensive
use plan change, and zoning map change at their November 20, 2006, planning
commission meeting. The CDRB should review and make a recommendation on the
design issues. Final action on this proposal is scheduled for the December 11, 2006,
city council meeting.
Chairperson Olson asked about the staff recommendation to install a new sidewalk
because of the reconstruction of White Bear Avenue and staff is asking for additional
landscaping in the area and she sees those two in conflict and she asked staff for their
thoughts on that.
Ms. Finwall said the sidewalk would be located within the right-of-way and the
landscaping would not be.
Chairperson Olson asked if the reconstruction of White Bear Avenue wouldn't extend
beyond the right-of-way?
Ms. Finwall said correct, it will extend within the 10- foot -wide easement which the city is
proposing but the engineering department states the reconstruction of White Bear
Avenue will include some improvements and modifications to the turn lanes along Beam
Avenue which could interrupt the sidewalk proposed along Beam Avenue. They are
suggesting the applicant submit escrow to be held rather than constructing the sidewalk
at this time?
Chairperson Olson asked how far back on Beam Avenue that reconstruction will go to
affect this site? Typically when reconstructing an intersection they don't go more than
50 feet, would they be going all the way back to the park? Personally she would like to
see the sidewalk constructed up to the area of reconstruction and then they can finish
the sidewalk after White Bear Avenue is complete.
Community Design Review Board 2
Minutes 11 -28 -2006
Ms. Finwall said she didn't have the answer to that question.
Board member Schurke asked if the scale of the sign that Walgreens is proposing is
comparable to what CVS Pharmacy has?
Chairperson Olson asked if Walgreens is proposing directional signs for the drive
through pharmacy?
Ms. Finwall said she assumes they would be, but is not certain.
Board member Schurke asked if there were any comments received by staff from the
public regarding this proposal?
Ms. Finwall said 39 property owners were surveyed and one property owner responded.
Linda Barber, 2040 Beam Avenue, said she was in favor of the Walgreens retail store
and pharmacy.
Chairperson Olson asked the applicant to address the board.
Mr. John Kohler, Architect with Semper Development, 821 Marquette Ave, #600,
Minneapolis, addressed the board. He displayed the building materials and samples for
this Walgreen's proposal. We are going to be doing a combined access and utility
easement which will help the entire area and the future parcel for the bank.
Mr. Kohler said because of the 10 foot easement we are going to move the trees back
10 feet. Rather than putting the landscaping in and disturbing it we are playing it safe so
there is no problem. At the previous CDRB review in 2005 the entry tower was at a 45
degree angle before and now we have squared the tower up. The CDRB wanted to get
rid of the awning and extend the entryway so it's covered so when you enter the store
you would be protected. Staff has recommended extending the windows which we could
do with spandrel glass which could come down to the top of the brick face. We also
removed the signage from the north and east sides of the building. (Mr. Kohler went
through the building material samples with the board.) Mr. Kohler asked if they could
have an electronic sign on the freestanding sign so they could have a changeable copy
area instead of having to manually go and change out the letters and numbers?
Ms. Finwall said the city's sign code prohibits flashing /blinking signs.
Mr. Kohler said the sign wouldn't flash or blink but we would prefer to have an electronic
sign rather than having a person go change the letters and numbers, plus it just looks
nicer. Walgreens is also connected to the amber alert system and can flash emergency
information and a photo on the electronic screen.
Ms. Finwall said the board had this discussion a few months ago when an applicant
requested an electronic sign, but had agreed to not have it blink and flash. The board
determined that would be too much of a code enforcement issue. For instance if there
was a new manager or the business was sold, they wouldn't necessarily know the sign
requirement to have the message remain constant and steady and they could change
Community Design Review Board
Minutes 11-28-2006
the sign to flash and blink, which would require city staff to be constantly monitoring the
sign. The board determined the sign ordinance as it stands does not allow electronic
signs without a variance.
Mr. Kohler said we just wanted an answer to that question. Regarding the sidewalk,
Walgreens was thinking the escrow money would be for the sidewalk along White Bear
Avenue and now they heard staff say it was for the sidewalk along Beam Avenue?
Ms. Finwall said she talked to Erin Laberee, assistant city engineer, and she said it
would be escrow for the Beam Avenue sidewalk and the sidewalk on White Bear
Avenue which was existing, could remain and if it needed to be reconstructed that
would be completed by the county as part of the overall street improvement.
Chairperson Olson asked what the reasoning was for the assistant city engineer to not
install the sidewalk in the area where there will not be any construction to the east?
Mr. Kohler said it's escrow for 150% of the building. It would be Walgreens' preference
to put the sidewalk in and be done with it.
Board member Schurke said the value of the sidewalk would be put into escrow and at
a future date when the road construction was complete, the sidewalk would be put in.
Ms. Finwall said the engineering department was requesting escrow for the entire length
of the sidewalk so there seems to be some confusion as to why that is being requested
when it is White Bear Avenue that is being reconstructed. This is something to work out
with the engineering department.
Board member Schurke asked staff where the recommendation was in the staff report
regarding the glazing of the spandrel glass.
Ms. Finwall said that's represented on page 11 item 4 b. 4.
Board member Shankar asked if the entire window would be spandrel?
Mr. Kohler said the glass would remain clear; the glass that would take up the rectangle
below would be spandrel because it is buried behind the brick, which is the back of the
cabinetry in the store.
Board member Shankar asked what color the glass would be?
Mr. Kohler said the clear glass would be clear with a light tint, and the lower glass would
be complimenting the stone or the color of the brick with a horizontal frame.
Chairperson Olson said that glass is only two feet off of grade and she is concerned
about the damage that could be done to it. She asked if that could that be raised to a
level of three feet?
Mr. Kohler said you have the line for the base course then you would want to raise the
base course all the way around.
Community Design Review Board 4
Minutes 11 -28 -2006
Board member Shankar asked if they would have a sidewalk next to the building or if
there would be landscaping against the building?
Mr. Kohler said no, Walgreens has found nationwide that putting landscaping close to
the building causes problems with brick or stone when irrigation hits the building which
stains the brick and the heat of the brick in turn burns the landscaping out. You would
also be allowing moisture to go down next to the foundation which is not a good idea.
Board member Schurke asked what Mr. Kohler's opinion was regarding the use of the
spandrel glass?
Mr. Kohler said he isn't sure it's necessary. It's to add more of a pedestrian friendly feel
but we would prefer not to do it.
Board member Schurke asked what Board member Shankar's opinion was regarding
the spandrel glass?
Board member Shankar said he would prefer the spandrel glass over the use of the
brick. He asked what the height of the horizontal mullion was that divides the clear glass
from the spandrel glass and he asked what the height would be from the sidewalk?
Mr. Kohler said it's above a person's head at about seven or eight feet in height and it's
even with the top of the entrance doors.
Board member Shankar asked why they couldn't extend the windows under the fourth
canopy that says One Hour Photo?
Mr. Kohler said you could put spandrel glass there but behind there they have interior
fixtures on that wall and on the front area they are trying to get natural light into the
store.
Chairperson Olson said she would be okay with that because you get kind of a step
down effect further east on this west elevation. She also understands the need for a
dark room for the one hour photo developing.
Board member Schurke said the one thing aesthetically that doesn't work for him is the
canopy over the drive up entry. There is a small space at the rear of the building where
there is a standing seam metal roof on the north elevation. A covered entry is a smart
thing to do but he thinks it warrants a horizontal line there.
Mr. Kohler said we can take that roof off or make that a flat roof. That is the problem
with looking at something in elevation that is going to be a long ways back.
Board member Schurke said that would be his preference to have that be a flat roof.
From the canopy standpoint you have a gable that doesn't seem to have any correlation
to the rest of the building.
Mr. Kohler said that is strictly for rain.
Community Design Review Board 5
Minutes 11 -28 -2006
Board member Schurke said his preference would be to play off the canopies off the
front of the building and instead of shedding water at the vehicles that are entering the
drive you would shed the water away.
Mr. Kohler said we could shed it out and turn it and go the other way.
Chairperson Olson said she doesn't want to drive under a canopy that is going to drop
down on the roof of my car.
Mr. Kohler said there would be gutters so the rain wouldn't come down onto the cars.
Board member Schurke said the functional aspect aside, it was more the aesthetic
impact of seeing that on the building elevation. He wonders if you need some directional
signage coming off of Beam Avenue if you are sharing that as a drive lane accessing
MGM Liquor to avoid traffic conflicts.
Mr. Kohler said they can put up small directional signage to that says drive - through exit
only.
Board member Shankar asked if the red brick is jumbo size and the tan brick modular
size?
Mr. Kohler said they are both jumbo size, we couldn't get a sample of the other. The tan
brick band will be soldier course.
Board member Shankar asked if there is a parapet wall and is there any rooftop
equipment?
Mr. Kohler said there is a three or four foot tall parapet wall and there will be rooftop
equipment that is about three feet tall. You won't see any rooftop equipment.
Chairperson Olson asked if they have any questions about the grading and drainage on
the site?
Mr. Kohler said there has been discussion regarding drainage but they will be installing
storm sectors and improving water clarity runoff.
Board member Schurke asked what Walgreens opinion was regarding installing a bike
rack?
Mr. Kohler said they are fine with that as long as if is installed so it doesn't block the
sidewalk anyway. It would have to be located in the northwest corner or the southeast
corner but there is space for a bike rack.
Board member Shankar moved to approve the plans date - stamped October 2, 2006, for
the Walgreens retail store and drive- through pharmacy to be located on the northeast
corner of Beam and White Bear Avenues. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the
following: (additions are underlined, deletions are stricken)
Community Design Review Board
Minutes 11-28-2006
I
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
b. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant must submit to
staff for approval the following items:
1 Revised grading/drainage/utility plans which comply with all city
engineering department requirements as specified in the November 20,
2006, engineering report including, but not limited to, the granting of a
right-of-way easement along White Bear Avenue and the submittal of an
escrow to the city to ensure construction of a six-foot-wide sidewalk along
the entire length of Beam Avenue to be complete by the city in 2008.
2) Revised site plan showing a six-foot-wide, sidewalk extending the entire
length of Parcel A and Parcel B along Beam Avenue and a bike rack to be
located near the building entrance.
3) Revised landscape plan showing the following:
a) Twenty more shrubs and forty perennial plants to be planted
along Beam and White Bear Avenues.
b) Re-establishment of any distributed land on Parcel B with sod or
native prairie grasses.
4) Revised SGUth and elevations (13eam and White 13eaF A-veRues)
follows: south and west windows constructed two feet from
greund gr the sidewalk with the bottom half of the window (portion of
the window two feet from sidewalk to top of door elevation) shall be
spandrel glass with vision glass above; east-drive through standincl seam
roof to be linear in elevation rather than gabled. In addition, show all
elevations with proposed roof-top equipment to verify that the roof
equipment will not extend beyond the parapet walls.
5) A revised lighting and photometrics plan which shows that the overall
illumination from outdoor lights does not exceed .4- foot - candles at all
property lines.
6) Obtain a permit from Ramsey County for construction on county right-of-
way for the driveway access, utility work, and sidewalk.
7) Watershed district approval if revisions warrant a new review.
8) A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior
improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work.
C. Signage on the property is part of the design review approval and is subject to
the following sign criteria:
Community Design Review Board 7
Minutes 11-28-2006
1 One freestanding sign to be located on the corner of Beam and White
Beam Avenue. Freestanding sign to be a maximum of 15 feet in height, 60
square feet in area, maintain a 10-foot setback to all property lines and
comply with traffic visibility requirements.
2) Two Walgreens wall signs to be located on the south and west elevation.
Signs to be constructed of individual letters with a maximum letter height
of two feet and must be centered within the manufactured limestone
fagade.
3) Two one hour photo signs and two pharmacy signs to be located on the
south and west elevation. Signs to be constructed of individual letters with
maximum letter height of 1.5 feet, and must be centered within the
manufactured limestone piers, above the windows.
4) One drive-through pharmacy directional sign to be located above the
standing seam metal roof on the south elevation. Sign to be constructed of
individual letters with a maximum letter height of 1.5 feet.
5) One interior entrance tower neon sign, 22 square feet in area.
d. The applicant shall complete the following before occupying the building:
1) Replace any property irons removed because of this construction.
2) Provide continuous concrete curb and gutter around the parking lot and
driveways.
MEEE
4) Screen the rooftop mechanical equipment.
5) Install all required outdoor lighting.
e. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
2) The above-required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of
Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or
contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1
if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of
occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer.
f. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
Chairperson Olson seconded. Ayes — Olson, Schurke, Shankar
The motion passed.
FowmR
LAw FIRM, L.L.C.
3252 fuce Street
Linle Canada, MN 55126
December 7. 2006
City Manager Greg Copeland
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
o6ce 651.287.8883
hcsimile 651.494.0143
tolJ free 877.709.8a77
emer gency 65 1.3 57.887 7
fowlerEfowlerJarr. com
www.fowler-law.com
Of Cou*cl.: Gellaghct Law Fitm
Re: Deput_v Chief John Banick
Dear Mr. Copeland and Ms. Guilfoile:
This letter is written notice conceming the proposed elimination of the Deputy chief positiot
held by John Banick and lhe apparent intent to not only eliminate his position, but end his
employment w'ith the City olMaplewood. Please ensure that this letter is included with the
Council packet for the meeting scheduled for December I I , 2006. and please forward a copy to
the City's appropriate legal counsel lbr employment issues. Please take notice that I do represent
Deputl ChiefJohn Banick individuall"v. Please be advised that I will be planning to attend the
Dec. ll,2006council meeting and would be available for a brief presentation on the agenda
regarding these issues if the council so desires.
The City of Maplewood cannot under the facts at hand legally end Deputy ChielBanick's
employment \.\,ith the Citv of Mapleuood. Even an attempt to eliminate positions via the budget
process. and thereby ending a tenurcd individuals employment in total. is not legal under
Maplewood's Civil Service Rules and the City''s Personnel Policies. At the December 1.2006
Truth in Taxation meeting. City Manager Copeland indicated quite clearly that it was his intent
b1'this proposal to eliminate not only the Deputy Chief s position held by Deputy Chief Banick.
but to end his employment with the City olMaplewood. Deputy Chief Banick legally will be
entitled to retain employment with the City of Maplewood, with the same rate of pay, regardless
ol any pnryerll uuth'rizkl re-organizat ion.
There are fbur authorities which control this conclusion. First, Maplewood's Personnel Polices.
revised April 3. 2006. under the heading of Reclassification/Reallocation states:
All classification changes must be approved by the City Manager, affected department
head and Human Resource Director. (See Page 16).
City Clerk Karen Guilfoile
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
Pagc 2
December 7. 2006
To date. I do not see any documentation that the affected department head, Chief Dave Thomalla.
has given his approval for the reclassification and elimination of Deputy Chief Banick's position.
Thus. the entire proposed re-classification and elimination ofthe Deputy Chief s position is
unlawful.
Secondly, Depuly ChielBanick is protected by the Maplewood Police Civil Service Commis.-ron
Rules. Section 21 ofthe Civil Service Rules states:
No regular sworn employees, after satisfactory completion of a probationary period of
cne year ccntinuous employment, shal! be remo,;ed or dischargeC except fo!"cause
upon written charges and after an opportunity to be heard in their own defense, as
provided by Minnesota law. (See Page 10)
Thus. there is no possible way. other than for cause. that swom and tenured employee Deputy
Chicf Banick can be eliminated by removal or termination. 'l'here exists no "for cause" basis lor
termination. thus there is no possibility for removal of Deputy ChielBanick from employment
u,ith the Citl ol Maplwood. Should the City u'ish to reorganize the department after all
necessary approval has been obtained. Deputy Chief Banick will simply be eff-ectively demoted
to a lower position and as explained below. retain his higher ratc ofpay that he was receiving for
Deputv Chief. In any even1, his empioyment with Maplewood will in no circumstance end or be
eliminated.
I am putting the City on notice. having properly cited and explained the applicable rule of law,
that should the City disregard and violate this clearly established rule of law by attempting to
remove Deputy Chief Banick from employment. my client and I will vielr'the violation of
Maplewood's own rule of law as knowing and deliberate. This will subjcct the City to civil
liabilitl'for deliberately violating my clicnt's due process righls.
Thirdly. the proposed reorganization and elimination of the Dcput"v Chielposition constitutes a
Demotion and Reduction in Rank. Maplcwood Police Civil Scrvice Commission Rules. Section
22 states:
Demotions - Any movement of an employee involving a permanent change from
a position in one class to a position for which a lower maximum rate of
compensation is prescribed shall be a reduction in rank or demotion and may be
made only upon recommendation of the City Manager and approved by the
Commission. (See Page 11)
Page 3
December 7. 2006
Therefore, the City Manager alone does not even have the authority to do what the current budget
proposal proposes. Any demotion of any police employee must have the approval of the .
Maplewood Police Civil Service Commission. which is binding. The Commission has NOT
approved this demotion. nor has it even been presented with notice of this issue. As mentioned
earlier. for any reclassification. the afllcted department head must also give approval. which has
not been obtained either.
Irinaiii, ii{aplewood's Pcrsonnei Polices, revised Aprii :, 2006, under the heading of Demotion
startes:
Employees may also be demoted if their position(s) has been abolished or reclassified
to a lower class.
Employees who are demoted due to reclassification, restructuring, or other
organizational change unrelated to performance, shall not normally suffer a pay cut. ln
these cases, the employee's pay will normally be frozen until they are eligible for an
anniversary increase. When an employee's pay is above the maximum of the range for
the new job class, their pay will normally be frozen until such time as annual
adjustments increase the salary range above the employee's salary. (See Page 16)
Therefore. under the combined authority cited above. even /the Chief of Police agrees to the
reclassification, and fthe Maplewood Police Civil Service Commission approves the demotion.
Deputy Chief Banick will still be employed (since no "for cause" basis exists), although
demoted. to a regular Lieutenant position. at the sume higher rate ofpay that he was receiving at
thc Deputy Chief position, and still entitled to receivc artr-ri reisaiJ' pa) incrcases. So, hopefr.rlly,
the proposed budget does not show any decrease in budget expenditures due to the proposed
elimination ofthe Deputy Chief position. because no budget savings will be realized due to any
proposed reorganization of Deputy Chief Banick's position. Any other action by the City under
the tacts at hand will not be lanfirl and will subject the City to liability.
It is my hope that the City will agree with the analysis and legal authority cited to above and
reach an understanding that in no way will Deputy Chief Banick's employment end whether or
not thcre is any rc-organization, without the need lor litigation. Please have the city's appropriatc
attomey contact me as soon as possible.
Page .1
Dccember 7. 2006
Sincereh.
/') /.
7 /
Robert Fowler
FOWLER LAW FIRM. L.L.C.
cc: Deput)' Chief Banir:k