HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 10-08 City Council PacketCouncil /Manager Workshop — 6 :00 p.m.
;�� AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, October 08, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -24
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 01 -22 (September 24, 200 1)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted
by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the
Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Donation of Folding Machine to the Historical Society
3. Resolution Certifying Election Judges for the General Election
4. Ramsey County Sheriff Department Explorer Post #2 -- Fee Waiver
5. Open Space Grant
6. Grant Reimbursement for Well Restoration
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 Assessment Hearing —Bush Avenue Improvements, Project 01 -04 (4 Votes)
2. 7:10 Salvation Army Church Expansion (2080 Woodlynn Avenue)
a. Conditional Use Permit
b. Design Approval
3. 7:20 Sinclair Station Remodeling (2158 Rice Street)
a. Conditional Use Permit (Motor Fuel Station)
b. Conditional Use Permit (Canopy Enlargement)
C. Design Approval
{ f
7
4. 7:30 Maplewood Toyota Expansion (2783 and 2889 Maplewood Drive)
�- a. Conditional Use Permit Revision
b. Conditional Use Permit (Motor Vehicle Storage)
C. Design Approval
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Bush Avenue Improvements, Project 01-04/Ripley Avenue, White Bear Avenue to Van Dyke
Street, Project 99 -12
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Hillcrest Study Area Moratorium (First Reading)
2. Approve Private Driveway Agreements — Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -04 &
Gladstone West Neighborhood Streets, Project 00 -05
3. Expenditure of 2001 LLEBG Grant Funds
4. Gladstone Park Development
5. Joy Park Buckthorn Removal/Contingency Funds
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for
this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make
arrangements. Assistant Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings -elected officials, staff and
citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone s opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We
appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for
each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language.
A.
Be
C.
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, September 24, 2001 "`'``'
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 01 -22 by C ounc il
Date
CALL TO ORDER End,�y _
Modifieo
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Rejected
A moment of silence was held for the victims and the survivors of the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks on the east coast.
ROLL CALL
Robert .Cardinal, Mayor
Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember
Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of Meeting 01 -19 (September 10, 2001)
The budget hearing for December 10' will beheld at 6: 00 p.m.
1.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 01 -19 (September 10,
2001) as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk.
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmember
Wasiluk, Allenspach, Koppen
Ab stain- Councilmember Collins
Minutes of Special Meeting —Canvas of Primary Election 01 -20 (September 13, 2001)
2.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Minutes of Special Meeting Canvas of
Primary Election 01 -20 (September 13, 2001).
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmember
Wasiluk, Allenspach, Koppen
Abstain - Councilmember Collins
Minutes of Special Meeting — Canvas of Primary Election 01 -21 (September 17, 2001)
3.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the Minutes of Special Meeting — Canvas of
Primary Election 01 -21 (September 17, 2001).
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmember
Wasiluk, Allenspach, Koppen
Abstain - Councilmember Collins
1
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M I. Maplewood Audit M2. Water Board
M3. Cable TV Public Access Channel M3. City E -Mail
Councilmember Collins moved to approve the agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
None
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the consent agenda as presented.
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
T ♦ T T ♦ T T T
$265,061.64
Checks #55299 thru #55372 dated 9/12/01
$168,853.18
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/4 thru 9/10/01
$321.30
Checks #55373 thru #55375 dated 9/13/01
$203,677.61
Checks #55376 thru #55440 dated 9/18/01
$144,891.36
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/11 thru 9/17/01
$782,805.09 Total Accounts Payable
T ♦ T 7T /1 T T
$335,,528.30 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 9/14/01
$27,365.12 Payroll Deduction check #85631 thru #85637 dated 9/14/01
$362,893.42 Total Payroll
$1,145,698.51 GRAND TOTAL
0
2. Pineview Estates Final Plat (County Road D)
Approved the Pineview Estates final plat. This final plat will create 72 lots for townhouses and
is on the north side of County Road D, east of Hazelwood Street.
3. Fire Department Contribution in Honor of Russ Allen
Accepted a memorial from the family of Russ Allen in the amount of $1,100.00 to be used for
trees at the new fire station on Clarence Street.
4. Public Safety Dispatcher Clarification
Adopted clarification to the Public Safety Officer pay and benefits policy.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 Alley Vacation (next to 49 Kingston Avenue)
a. Assistant City Manager Coleman introduced the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Shann Finwall, presented the specifics of the report.
C. Design Review Boardmember Ananth Shankar presented details from the August 28, 01
Design Review Board.
d. Commissioner Will Rossbach provided details from the September 4, 2001 Planning
Commission Meeting.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents.
The following persons were heard:
Kristin Borowske, 63 Kingston Avenue, Maplewood
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution that vacates the unused alley
that is between the properties at 49 and 63 Kingston Avenue:
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -83
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Kristin Borowske applied for the vacation of the following- described alley:
The alley in Block 2, between Lots 1 -4 and Lots 5 -8 that is north of the north right -of -way line of Kingston
Avenue as platted as part of St. Aubin and Dion's Rice Street Addition in Section 18, Township 29, Range
22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota;
3
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On September 4, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
vacation.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following
abutting properties:
Lots 1 -4, Block 2, St. Aubin and Dion's Rice Street Addition (63 Kingston Avenue) (PIN 18- 29- 22 -34-
0015.)
Lots 5 -8, Block 2, St. Aubin and Dion's Rice Street Addition (49 Kingston Avenue) (PIN 18- 29- 22 -34-
0016.)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described right -of -way
vacation for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The city and the applicant have no plans to build an alley in this location.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes -All
2. 7:10 5 -8 Club Inc. (Beau's) (2289 Minnehaha Avenue)
a. Land Use Plan Amendment (R1- to BC -M)
b. Zonging May Change (R -1 to BC -M)
C. Conditional Use Permit (Restaurant)
d. Conditional Use Permit (Expansion of Nonconforming Use)
e. Parking Lot Setback Variance
f. Design Approval
a. Assistant City Manger Melinda Coleman introduced the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Finwall provided specifics of the report.
c. Boardmember Shankar presented details from the August 28, 2001 Design Review
Board.
d. Commissioner Rossbach provided details from the August 20, 2001 Planning
Commission Meeting.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public meeting.
El
The following people were heard:
Jill Skogheim, the applicant, 9531 West 78 Street, Eden Prairie
Kathleen Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon Ave. E., Maplewood
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution approving the land use plan
amendment for the 5 -8 Club Restaurant from single- dwelling residential (R -1) to business
commercial modified (B -C (M)):
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -84
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Food Services, Inc., d/b /a 5 -8 Club, made application to the City of Maplewood for a
change to the city's land use plan from single dwelling residential to business commercial (modified) (BC(M))
for the remodeling and expansion of an existing restaurant located at 2289 Minnehaha Avenue.
WHEREAS, this change applies to 2289 and 2299 Minnehaha Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On August 20, 2001, the planning commission held a public hearing. City staff published a hearing
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning
commission conducted the public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and
present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
plan amendments.
2. - On September 24, 2001, the city council discussed the land use plan changes. They considered reports
and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described land use
plan change for the following reasons:
1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's policies for commercial use. This includes:
a. Require adequate off - street parking and loading facilities.
b. Avoid disruption of adjacent or nearby residential areas.
C. Require commercial developers to make all necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with
surrounding residential uses.
d. Require adequate screening or buffering of new or expanded commercial areas from any adjacent
existing or planned residential development.
2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because:
a. Expansion of the parking area will supply adequate off - street parking and loading facilities for
the site.
b. Expansion of the restaurant /bar has been designed in the best manner to avoid disruption of
adjacent or nearby residential areas including placing the new deck in the front of the building as
opposed to the rear, installing a 6 -foot high privacy fence along all shared residential property
lines, and locating the dumpster along the building wall which is away from the residential
property lines.
C. Expansion and remodeling of the restaurant/bar improves upon the existing structure, creating a
neighborhood restaurant which is compatible with surrounding residential uses.
d. Expansion and remodeling of the restaurant/bar includes adequate screening from adjacent
existing residential properties with a 6 -foot high privacy fence.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins. Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution approving the zoning map
change (R -1 to B C -M)
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -85
ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Food Services, Inc., d/b /a 5 -8 Club has proposed the following change to the City of
Maplewood's zoning map: single dwelling residential (R -1) to business commercial (modified) (BC(M)).
WHEREAS, this change applies to 2289 and 2299 Minnehaha Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the legal description of these properties are:
Minnehaha Suburb Heights: Subject to the highway, the E 60' of Lot 13, the S 148.5' of Lot 14, and the
S Y2 of Lot 15.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Numbers for these properties are as follows:
25- 29 -22 -33 -0066 and 25- 29 -22 -33 -0028, respectively.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On August 20, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the rezoning
change.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change in
the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or
from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in
the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable,
and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical
extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and
schools.
5. The proposed change will reflect the existing land use on the property.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the resolution (01- 09 -86) approving a Conditional
Use Permit (Restaurant).
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the resolution (01- 09 -87) approving a Conditional
Use Permit (Expansion of Nonconforming Use).
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
RESOLUTIONS 01 -09 -86 & 87
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTIONS
WHEREAS, Food Services, Inc., d/b /a 5 -8 Club applied for two conditional use permits including:
1. Expansion of a nonconforming building; and
2. Operate a restaurant within the business commercial (modified) (BC(M)) zoning district.
WHEREAS, these permits apply to property located at 2289 and 2299 Minnehaha Avenue, Maplewood,
Minnesota. The legal description is:
Minnehaha Suburb Heights: Subject to the highway, the E 60' of Lot 13, the S 148.5' of Lot 14, and the
S V2 of Lot 15.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Numbers for these properties are as follows:
25- 29 -22 -33 -0066 and 25- 29 -22 -33 -0028, respectively.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
On August 20, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permits.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
7
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permits based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
2. The use would not depreciate property values.
3. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water
runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
4. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
5. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
6. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
7. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval of the two conditional use permits is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction of the 5 -8 Club shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The
director of community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed restaurant/bar remodeling must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The use of the deck is limited to the following hours: Sunday through Thursday — opening of business
until 10 p.m.; Friday and Saturday — opening of business until 11 p.m.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution approving the Parking Lot
Setback Variance for the 5 -8 Club Inc:
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -88
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Food Services, Inc., d/b /a 5 -8 Club, applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to 2289 and 2299 Minnehaha Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota. The
legal description is:
Minnehaha Suburb Heights: Subject to the highway, the E 60' of Lot 13, the S 148.5' of Lot 14, and the
S Y2 of Lot 15.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Numbers for these properties are as follows:
25- 29 -22 -33 -0066 and 25- 29 -22 -33 -0028, respectively.
WHEREAS, Section 36 -26(a) of the zoning code requires a 20- foot -wide landscaped and screened
buffer when a commercial property abuts a residential property.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 5- foot -wide buffer between commercial and residential
property.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 15 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
On August 20, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permits.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent. notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described variance for
the following reasons:
1. Strict enforcement of the code would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property and not created by the property owner. The 20- foot -wide buffer requirement would not allow
the creation of a sufficient number of parking spaces for the facility.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, since the applicant is
providing adequate screening and buffering to protect the adjacent homeowners.
Approval is subject to the applicant providing a 6 -foot high screening fence as proposed.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins. Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Design Plans for the 5 -8 Club Inc.
The city is approving these plans based on the findings required by the code. The applicant,
Food Services, Inc., shall do the following:
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
6
b. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the parking lot expansion, the city engineer must
approve a final grading and drainage plan. This plan shall include: water retention calculations
and the location of all existing trees on the site to be preserved and the means of protecting the
trees.
C. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant must supply the city with the
following:
(1) A revised landscape plan to staff for approval that incorporates the following. details:
(a) Obtain approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Ramsey
County to install landscaping within the Stillwater Road and Minnehaha Avenue
rights -of -way. Any required landscape revisions in these areas must also be
approved by the city.
(b) Details for the perennial garden to be located on the north side of the deck.
(c) In- ground sprinkler for all landscaped areas. If the installation of a sprinkler
system is not feasible because of existing pavement, the applicant must submit
written agreement to hand water all landscaping.
(d) In addition to the above, all common grounds shall be sodded (except for mulched
and edged planting beds).
d. Prior to certificate of occupancy the applicant must:
(1) Complete all required exterior improvements including landscaping and underground
irrigation, parking lot, screening fence, exterior lighting.
(2) Install stop signs at both driveway exits.
e. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
(1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare.
(2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The
amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter,
or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
(3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work.
f. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes -All
3. 7:30 Schlomka Landscaping Inc. (2511 Carver Avenue)
10
a. Conditional Use Permit (Landscaping Business in F Zone)
b. Conditional Use Permit (Over -Sized Accessory Structure)
a. Assistant City Manager Coleman introduced the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Finwall provided specifics of the report.
C. Commissioner Rossbach presented details from the September 4, 01 Planning
Commission Meeting.
d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public meeting.
The following people were heard:
Paul Schlomka, applicant, 2511 Carver Avenue, Maplewood
e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Allenspach moved to approve the following resolutions for the Conditional Use
Permit for a Landscaping Business in an F Zone and a Conditional Use Permit for an Over -Sized
Accessory Structure with staff revisions:
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -89
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Paul Schlomka applied for a conditional use permit to operate a landscaping business
within a farm residence zoning district;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2511 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
The legal description is: Subject to HWY AVE and Easements, Part of Southeasterly of Northwesterly L of SD
HV►TY of W %2 of NW 1 /4 of NE 1 /4 of SEC 24, TN 28, RN 22.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this property is
24- 28 -22 -12 -0005;
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September 4, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit.
2. On September 24, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above- described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
11
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water
runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets. and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions:
1. The business must be conducted solely within the house or an accessory structure.
2. No exterior storage is allowed, including all commercial vehicles, equipment, and supplies associated
with the business.
3. No more than one (1) nonresident employee shall be allowed to work on the premises.
4. The landscape business hours of operation are limited to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
5. Any exterior lighting associated with the business must not produce glare on adjacent residential
properties nor shall it exceed 0.4- foot - candles at the property line.
6. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
7. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one year.
8. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed in the event the property is transferred to a new owner who
intends to operate a landscaping business, or similar business, from the property.
9. If the conditional use permit for a landscape business is voluntarily abandoned and ceases for a
12
continuous period of one year or more, the conditional use permit will become null and void.
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -90
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Paul Schlomka applied for a conditional use permit to construct a 4,224- square -foot pole
barn within a farm- residence zoning district;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2511 Carver Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota.
The legal description is Subject to HWY AVE and Easements, Part of Southeasterly of Northwesterly L of SD
HWY of W 1 /2 of NW 1 /4 of NE 1 /4 of SEC 24, TN 28, RN 22.
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this property is
24- 28 -22 -12 -0005.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September 4, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
conditional use permit.
2. On September 24, 2001, the-city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the-
Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the
public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.
The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the
city's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,
because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water
runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic
congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
13
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into
the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions:
1. The pole barn is limited in size to 4,224 square feet in area and 18.5 feet in height.
2. The pole barn must maintain at least a 50 -foot setback from the adjacent residential property.
3. The applicant will obtain all necessary permits for the construction of the pole barn.
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit the owner will submit for staff's review and approval a revised site
plan showing a 6 -foot high berm to be constructed along the east side of the pole barn and driveway. A
staggered row of 12, 6- foot -high evergreens must be installed on the berm.
5. Prior to the building department finalizing the building permit, the owner will do the following:
a. Remove the stockpile dirt and rock from the north side of the property. These materials must be
removed from the property entirely, used in the construction of the pole barn, or stored inside the
pole barn.
b. Install the required berm and landscaping.
6. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
7. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen. Ayes -All
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Walgreens (1706 White Bear Avenue)
a. Assistant City Manger Coleman introduced the staff report.
b. Associate Planner Finwall provided specifics of the report.
C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public meeting.
The following people were heard:
14
John Kohler, Semper Development, LTD
Robert Bell, Representing the Owner of the Building
Raleigh Nelson, Owner of the Building
Will Rossbach, 1386 E. County Road C, Maplewood
Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane, Maplewood
Kathleen Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon, Maplewood
Scott Venne, Executive Director of the White Bear Avenue Business Association, 1829
Sims Avenue, St. Paul
Ananth Shankar, Maplewood Design Review Board
d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the revised site plan for Walgreens according to
staff's revised plan and modifications.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmember
Allenspach, Wasiluk, Koppen
Nays - Councilmember Collins
2. Receive Comments and Responses on Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Beaver
Lake Townhomes- -City File No. 01 -10
Councilmember Koppen moved to receive all comments and responses to the EAW document,
along with the Finding of Fact for the Beaver Lake Townhomes Planned Unit Development.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
3. Consider Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on Environmental Assessment Worksheet
for Beaver Lake Townhomes- -City File No. 01 -10
Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution determining that the
environmental rule requir ements have been met and that the potential environmental effects are
not considered significant enough to warrant preparation of an EIS, and further that plans for
storm water, grading, erosion control and buffer /turf management shall be submitted b the
ro osed prior to site plan and final plat consideration and further, that this negative declaration
be distri buted to all parties on the State Environmental Ouality Board distribution list and all
ersons commenting in writing on the EAW:
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -91
BEAVER LAKE TOWNHOMES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is the Responsible Governmental Unit for the Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW) for the Beaver Lake Townhomes Planned Unit Development at the corner of Lakewood
Drive and Maryland Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the EAW was prepared and distributed to all parties on the State Environmental Quality Board
(EQB) distribution list, as well as local agency representatives and the petitioners' representative; and
15
WHEREAS, the EAW Notice of Availability was published in the EQB Monitor on August 6, 2001, beginning
a 30 -day comment period that ended on September 5, 2001; and
WHEREAS, a meeting sponsored by the City of Maplewood was held at the City of Maplewood Fire Station
on July 23, 2001, to receive input from interested persons; and
WHEREAS, writtcn comments on the EAW were received and considered from nine parties; responses were
developed, and findings were prepared; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to make the final determination on the adequacy of an EAW
and the related negative or positive declaration as to the need to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS); and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the EAW requires that plans pertaining to stormwater,
grading, erosion control, and buffer /turf management .be submitted by the project proposer for review and
approval, and that the City will consider the project density, the inclusion of public trails, and protection of the
buffer zones, prior to approval of the site plan and final plat.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council has determined, based on the findings contained in the
Record of Decision, that the environmental review requirements have been met by the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet prepared for the Beaver Lake Townhomes Planned Unit Development, and the potential
environmental effects are not considered significant enough to warrant preparation of an EIS; and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Council requests that the negative declaration be distributed to
all parties on the State Environmental Quality Board distribution list and all persons commenting in writing on
the EAW.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approve Purchase of Tax Forfeit Property from Ramsey County for Storm Pond Purposes at
Beaumont and Larpenteur.
Councilmember Koppen moved to accept the following resolution to acquire the tax - forfeited
properties for purposes of storm water holding and ponding:
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -92
TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY ACQUISITION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The State of Minnesota has declared certain properties held in trust located within the City of
Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota to be Tax Forfeited;
WHEREAS, The Office of Tax Forfeited Lands, Department of Revenue and Taxation, Ramsey County,
Minnesota has granted the City of Maplewood opportunity to acquire said properties pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision 1;
WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon the city to provide for control of storm water runoff and drainage
16
containment;
WHEREAS, said properties are identified as necessary for drainage and storm water ponding purposes as
prescribed by the Maplewood Comprehensive Storm Water plan;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the city council deems it in the public interest and approves the
acquisition of, the following described Tax Forfeited properties:
PID
Lot #
Block #
Plat Name Acquisition
Cost
182922340076
16 -19
14
St. Aubin & Dion's Rice St. Add
$4
182922340077
20
14
St. Aubin & Dion's Rice St. Add.
$1 5 103.30
182922340078
21
14
St. Aubin & Dion's Rice St. Add
$1,103.30
182922340079
22
14
St. Aubin & Dion's Rice St. Add
$1
Total Cost
$7,513.10
All in Section 18, Township 29, Range 22 North in Ramsey County.
Councilmember Collins seconded Ayes -All
2. Lawful Gambling License — TSE, Inc.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the following resolution that approves the
application for a lawful gambling license to be used at the Chalet Lounge, 1820 Rice Street. The
purpose of the organization is to provide training and rehabilitation services for people with
dev disabilities:
RESOLUTION 01 -09 -093
APPROVING A LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE FOR TSE, INC.
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the premises permit
for lawful gambling is approved for TSE, Inc., to operate at The Chalet Lounge and Restaurant located at 1820
Rice Street, Maplewood, Minnesota.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council waives any objection to the timeliness of
application for said permit as governed by Minnesota Statute §349.213.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the
Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit as being in compliance with Minnesota Statute
§349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution by the City Council of
Maplewood, Minnesota be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval.
Councilmember Allenspach seconded Ayes -All
3. Council Meeting — Date Change
Councilmember Allenspach moved to change the November 12, 2001 Council Meeting date to
Tuesday November 13, in observance of Veterans Day.
17
Councilmember Koppen seconded Ayes -All
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane, Maplewood asked if it would be a benefit for Maplewood
to be a charter city? The council will research that option and report back to the city residents.
2. Diana Longrie- Kline, 1778 DeSoto Street, Maplewood, attended the election recount on
Monday September 17, 2001. She felt the recount was conducted in professional manner by
the city clerk's office and requested the procedure be published in the next issue of Maplewood
in Motion.
3. Margaret Lutfey, 1076 Mary Street, Maplewood, had comments regarding the Beaver Lake
EAW.
4. Jody Northouse, 1055 Sterling, Maplewood, had comments regarding the Beaver Lake EAW.
5. Kathy Juenemann, 721 Mount Vernon, Maplewood, felt the EAW process and development
review should be explained in the Maplewood in Motion.
6. Will Rossbach, 1386 E. County Road C., Maplewood, was supportive of the residents
involvement, but felt time and dollars were wasted with the Beaver Lake EAW, and felt
residents received poor guidance form their "mentors ".
7. Bob Zick, 1880 Shore Drive, Maplewood, commented on the Beaver Lake EAW and city
representation on the Suburban Area Cable Commission.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Maplewood Audit Maplewood was chosen to be audited by AT & T due to the large number
of cable users in the city.
2. Water Board Polices of the waterboard were shared with the council.
3. Cable TV Public Access Councilmember Allenspach shared resident's concerns about a very
offensive show broadcasting on the cable public access channel.
4. City E -Mail Website The city has experienced technical difficulties with the E -Mail, but
currently the program is successfully up and running.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
None
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Allenspach moved to adjourn at 9:45.
Councilmember Koppen seconded Ayes -All
18
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
,fiction by Council
TO: City Council
Date
FROM: Finance Director Endorsed
Modified
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Rejected
DATE: October 2, 2001
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$141,758.92
$84
$9,930.38
$871
$52,959.01
Checks #55443 thru #55506 dated 9/25
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/18 thru 9/24/01
Checks #55507 thru #55508 dated 9/26 thru 9/27/01
Checks #55509 thru #55589 dated 10/2/01
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 9/25 thru 9/28/01
$1,160,916.90 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$367,999.90 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 9/28/01
$26,009.59 Payroll Deduction check #85888 thru #85892 dated 9/28/01
$394,009.49 Total Payroll
$1,554,926.39 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions
on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if
necessary.
hu
Attachments
C:\OFFICE\WP-DOCS\AGENDA\APCLO102.00T
vchli'$t - Check Register Page: 1
09/24/2001 10:32:09AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
55443
9/25/01
.00051
ADVANCED GRAPHICS
55444
9/25/01
00067
ALLIED BLACKTOP CO.
55445
9/25/01
00081
AMERICAN DESIGNER CLASSICS
55446
9/25/01
00198
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
55447
9/25/01
02194
BUILDERS MORTGAGE
55448
9/25/01
02167
BUNCE, LARRY
55449
9/25/01
00237
C.C. SHARROW CO., INC.
55450
9/25/01
00255
CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP CO.
55451
9/25/01
00272
CARVER, NICHOLAS
55452
9/25/01
00354
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
55453
9/25/01
02152
DOMORE DISPATCH FURNITURE
55454
9/25/01
00417
DON'S RODENTS
55455
9/25/01
02168
FINLEY BROS INC
55456
9/25/01
02071
FISHER, DAVID
55457
9/25/01
00531
FRA -DOR BLACK DIRT & RECYCLE
55458
9/25/01
02201
FRATTALONE, NICK
55459
9/25/01
00585
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
55460
9/25/01
02195
GRAND DESIGN
55461
9/25/01
00622
HAMERNICK DECORATING CENTER
55462
9/25/01
02149
HERSOM, HEIDI
55463
9/25/01
00681
HORSNELL, JUDITH
55464
9/25/01
01857
JOHNSON BROS WELL DRILLING
55465
9/25/01
00771
JOHNSON, RICK
55466
9/25/01
02196
JORGENSON CONST INC
55467
9/25/01
00785
KAMCOM TECHNOLOGIES
55468
9/25/01
00828
L.M.C.I.T.
55469
9/25/01
00836
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER
55470
9/25/01
00896
M.C.M.A.
55471
9/25/01
00888
M/A ASSOCIATES
55472
9/25/01
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
55473
9/25/01
02197
MASTERPIECE HOMES INC
55474
9/25/01
00945
MASYS CORP
55475
9/25/01
01819
MCLEOD USA
55476
9/25/01
00998
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO.
55477
9125/01
01008
MIKE'S LP GAS & R.V. SERVICE
55478
9/25/01
0101 - 5
MINNCOMM
55479
9/25/01
01088
MN POLLUTION `CONTROL AGENCY
55480
9/25/01
01099
MONROY, JON J.
55481
9/25/01
02198
MONSON, CHUCK
55482
9/25/01
01141
NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
55483
9/25/01
00395
NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF
55484
9/25/01
01126
NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001
55485
9/25/01
01174
NORTH ST PAUL- MAPLEWOOD-
EMBLEMS
SEAL COAT PROJ 01 -05
REF ESCROW - 2653 PROMONTORY PL I
MONTHLY WATER UTIL - BILL DATE 9/
REF ESCROW - 918 NEW CENTURY BL
REF ESCROW - 916 NEW CENTURY BL
REF ESCROW - 912 NEW CENTURY BL
REF ESCROW - 910 NEW CENTURY BL
REF ESCROW - 906 NEW CENTURY BL
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER MTG
3/8 INCH BINDER CHAINS
BUILDING & PLANNING STAMPS
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER MTG
REPAIR TO ENGINE 2
3 COMMUNICATION CENTER CHAIRS
3 COMMUNICATION CENTER CHAIRS
25 ADULT MICE
RESURFACE 2 TENNIS CRTS, BASKETB
LAKE COUTNRY CHAPTER MTG
BLACK DIRT
REF ESCROW - 3035 CAREY HTS DR
TICKETS LOCATED
REF ESCROW - 840 CRESTVIEW `DR S
HYDRANT PAINT
BALLOONS
MILEAGE /20 TO 9/4 '
WELL - SERVICE 8/2 TO 8/13
DEER REMOVAL'''
REF ESCROW - 1686 E
PC'S AS QUOTED 1.2 GHZ, MATROX DUB
2 PC'S W/WIN 2000 & OFF 2K & MONITOF
CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE
CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE
3 REGISTRATIONS NOV 2001 SEMINAR
MEMBERSHIP FEE 5/1 TO 4/30/02
SUPPLIES
VACUUM & FILTER BAGS,'
ROLLS FOR TUG MTG 9/13/01
REF ESCROW - 1173. HIGHRIDGE CT E
HARDWARE /SOFTWARE MANNT OCT 20
DSL INSTALL FIRE STATION. 1
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
MERCH FOR RESALE
20 #, FILL ON BOTTLE .OAS
PAGER
WASTEWATER SEMINAR
INK CARTRIDGE. & VIDEO TAPE
REF ESCROW - 2663 PROMONTORY PL I
PASSPORT CAMERA FILM
DNR FEES
PERA LIFE INS (P /R DED IN SEPT)
MEMBERSHIP FOR CITY MANAGER
183.71
72,942.35
1,013.70
2,412.65
1,047.67
1,047.67
1,047.67
1,047. 67
1,047.7
15.00
232.85
352.10
15.00
90.80
649.00
1,448.00
14.64
8,973.00
15.00
234.31
1,010.27
3.20
1,004.25
313.64
17.93
19.00
3,550.00
200.00
2,570.48
8,531.76
3,174.14
1,025.34
30.00
525.00
103.00
434.46
720.20
41.96
2,011 =. &
704.25
145.16
94.15
175.35
268.20
11.00
1.63.98
420.00
89.43
1,526.99
478.92
195.00
201.00
142.00
1
vchlist
Check Register,:
Page: 2
09/2412001
10:32:09,AM
City of Maplewood
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
55486
9/25/01
01941
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
LEAGUE - 1 ST AWARDS
133.82
LEAGUE - 1 ST AWARD
19.12
55487
9/25/01
01289
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC.
SOUTHLAWN & UPPER AFTON MEDIAN
4,600.00
55488
9/25/01
01337
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
DATA PROCESSING SERVICES JULY 20
1,007.50
55489
9/25/01
02199
RC WITT CONSTRUCTION
REF ESCROW - 2544 HALLER LN E
3,133.84
55490
9/25/01
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MERCH FOR RESALE
358.09
55491
9/25/01
02200
RINDAL, DON
EMT TEXT BOOK
55.35
55492
9125/01
01426
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
SAFETY SHOES
152.12
55493
9/25/01
01487
SOUTHWIND HOMES
CLOSE FUND 844
48.48
55494
9/25/01
01516
STAPLES, PAULINE
STAMPS
16.00
55495
9/25/01
01526
STATE TREASURER
2001 FALL BLDG CODE SEMINAR - 3 RE
90.00
55496
9/25/01
01572
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
INK CARTRIDGES
416.63
INK CARTRIDGES
161.45
INK CARTRIDGES
233.61
INK CARTRIDGES
377.27
55497
9/25/01
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO
1,662.00
55498
9/25/01
01591
TAYLOR SALES, INC.
REPAIR YOGURT MACHINE
69.44
REPAIR, YOGURT,.MACHINE
394.82
55499
9/25701
02164
TOLTZ, KING, 'DUVALL, ANDERSON
PROF SRVS'=' HAZELWOOD "SOCCER FI
2
55500
9/25/01
02069
ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC
TELEVISED SEWER 11NE PROJ 00 -04
150.00
55501
9/25/01
01698
UNITED WAY OF THE ST. PAUL
QUARTERLY.PAYMENT - 3RD QTR
936.25
55502
9/25/01
01704
URBANSKI, HOLLY
REPLENISH PETTY'CASH'
206.95
55503
9/25/01
01`709
VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVAL AUGUST'
355.72
55504
9/25/01
01718
VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
- f.. '
LAMPS FOR' STATION 1 � -
91.64
55505
9/25/01
01750
WATSON CO INC, THE
:
MERCH` FOR RESALE
140.74
MERCH FOR RESALE
210.78
55506
9/25/01
01757
WELCHLIN, CABOT
MEALS 9/10 TO 9/13
44.87
64 Checks in this report
Total checks
141 ,758.92
4
a
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted
Settlement
Date
Date
Payee
Description
Amount
09/17/01
09/18/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
548.00
09/17/01
09/18/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
11,191.99
09/14/01
09/18/01
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
13,530.00
09/14/01:
09/18/01
CBSA
Dental Claims
3
09/18/01
09/20/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
600.00
09/18/01
09/20/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
13,071.00
09/11/01
09/19/01
MN Dept of Revenue
Sales Tax
6
09/19/01
09/20/01
MN State Treasurer.
Drivers License #697
391.75
09/19/01
09/20/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
15
09/20/01
09/21/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
505.75
09/20/01
09/21/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
8
09/11/01
09/21/01
MN Dept of Revenue
Fuel Tax
190.00
09/20/01
09/21/01
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
25.00
09/21/01
09/24/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
800.50
09/21/01
09/24/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
9
TOTAL
84
3
Vchlist Check Register Page: 1
09/28/2001 12:12:02PM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
55507
9/26/01
02203
UNUM PROVIDENT
55508
9/27/01
02207
DELTACONNECT
55509
10/2/01
00018
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES
55510
10/2/01
00026
ABOVE ALL HARDWOOD FLOORS
55511
10/2/01
00052
ADVANCED GRAPHIX INC.
55512
10/2/01
00162
BAUMAN, GAYLE
55513
10/2/01
00174
BELDE, STAN
55514
10/2/01
01862
BUILDING FASTENERS
55515
10/2/01
02114
55516
10/2/01
00279
55517
10/2/01
02172
55518
10/2/01
02204
55519
10/2/01
02205
55520
10/2/01
00374
55521
10/2/01
00427
55522
10/2/01
00103
55523
10/2/01
00447
55524
10/2/01
00456
55525
10/2/01
00463
CARL BOLANDER & SONS CO.
CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.
CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT
COMMERICAL DOOR SYSTEMS INC
CORNER MARKING CO
DANKO MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SRVS
DUNN, ALICE
EARL F ANDERSON INC
ECOPRINT GRAPHICS SERVICES
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
55526
10/2/01
00539
FREEDOM VALU CENTER
55527
10/2/01
00543
GE CAPITAL
55528
10/2/01
00589
GRAF, DAVE
55529
10/2/01
02158
HANSEN, LORI
55530
10/2/01
00668
HIEBERT, STEVEN
55531
10/2/01
00669
HILLTOP TRAILER SALES INC
55532
10/2/01
00683
HORWATH, THOMAS
55533
10/2/01
00483
IDEACOM MID - AMERICA
55534
10/2/01
01857
JOHNSON BROS WELL DRILLING
55535
10/2/01
00789
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO
55536
10/2/01
02121
KOS, HEATHER
55537
10/2/01
00827
L.M.C.I.T.
55538
10/2/01
00828
L.M.C.I.T.
55539
10/2/01
00838
LAKELAND TRUCK CENTER, INC.
55540
10/2/01
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
55541
10/2/01
02208
M E B B
55542
10/2/01
00966
MEDICA CHOICE
55543
10/2/01
01946
MEDICA FINANCE DEPT
55544
10/2/01
00968
MEEHAN, JAMES
55545
10/2/01
02206
MELLEN, RICHARD
55546
10/2/01
00972
MENARDS
55547
10/2/01
00985
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
55548
10/2/01
02054
MIDWEST FENCE & MFG.
55549
10/2/01
01085
MN LIFE INSURANCE
55550
10/2/01
01821
MYRON MANUFACTURING CORP
Description /Accoun
LTD PREMIUM - OCT
DENTAL PREMIUM - OCT
MONTHLY CELL PHONE
RECOATED GYM FLOOR
RE -COAT WOOD FLOORS AT MCC
EMBLEMS
MEALS & LODGING - MGFOA CONF
K -9 HANDLER - OCT
MISC. SUPPLIES
MISC SUPPLIES
EDGERTON PARK SITE
3 YDS READY MIX
REIMBURSE FOR UNIFORMS - J MARIN
DOOR KEYS
SELF INKING RUBBER STAMPS
HURST HOSE ASSY & SERVICE
UNIFORMS
6'X 3# GALV. CAHNNEL POST
BUSINESS CARDS
ELECTION PUBLICATIONS
REPAIR RESCUE 1 VEHICLE
REPAIR RESCUE 2 VEHICLE
REPAIR RESCUE 7 VEHICLE
REPAIR AMBULANCE MEDIC 4 VEHICLE
CAR WASHES
KODAK COPIER - SEP
INSTRUCTOR KARATE - SEP
SNACKS FOR ELECTION TRAINING
K -9 HANDLER - OCT
COS TRAILER RENT - AUG
COS TRAILER RENT - SEP
TREE INSPECTIONS
PHONE REPAIR & SERVICE
PHONE REPAIR & SERVICE
SEAL WELL - FROST & ENGLISH
UNLEADED MID - GRADE (89 OCTANE) G
MISC SUPPLIES & MILEAGE 7/18 TO 9/1
W/C INS - OCT TO DEC 2001
2ND INS INSTALLMENT OCT - DEC
BLADE ASSEMBLY
WIPER BLADE
BLADE ASSY - CREDIT
BIRTHDAY CAKES
SHEET CAKES
2001 ANNUAL EDUC SEMINAR
MONTHLY PREMIUM
REFUND AMB R DRASSAL 01012254
BACK BOARDS
FLUSH VALVE FOR BATHROOMS - STA i
BLADES
WASTEWATER - OCT
CUT DOWN FENCE 30'
MONTHLY PREMIUM
DEPT CALENDARS
Amount
2,682.72
7,247.66
121.77
9,548.40
1,247.00
183.71
471.84
35.00
55.52
175.53
318,424.40
331.48
1,186.04
19.85 -
38.63
104.26
177.44
3,800:36
181.05
49.97
1,230.67
1,305.13
970.66
478.96
129.00
528.32
138.00
34.45
35.00
410.03
410.03
448.00
159.00
1,147..06
7,130.00
10,046.82
103.39
29,284.50
38, 692.50
61.86
17.42
-19.08
142.50
114.00
170.00
39, 366.99
50.01
350.00
159.89
46.24
183,478.20
375.00
2,680.11
359.85
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
( 09/28/2001 12:12:02PM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
55551
10/2/01
01134
NAGEL, BRYAN
SAFETY BOOTS
165.00
.55552
10/2/01
01145
NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT CONF.
RESERVATION /DEPOSIT EXPLORER CO
100.00
55553
10/2/01
00395
NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF
DNR FEES
59.00
55554
10/2/01
01175
NORTH ST. PAUL, CITY OF
MONTHLY UTIL - 8/6 TO 9/11
2,528.96
SEWER & SECURITY LIGHT
620.21
55555
10/2/01
01202
NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
BUCKTHORN MGMT BROCHURES
3,168.18
55556
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF CLARENCE ANDERSON - AMB 0101
161.05
55557
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
PEGGY JOHNSON
100.00
55558
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF LISA STEELE - DRAMA TEENS
85.00
55559
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF MARY JO COCCHIARELLA - CPR
50.00.
55560
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF GRETCHEN PETERSON -SWIM LE
40.00
55561
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF EUGENE MORISSET - SWIM LESSO
40.00
REF EUGENE MORISSET - SWIM LESSO
40.00
55562
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF DAVE SCHMITT - RB LEAGUE
14.00
55563
10/2/01
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF COLLEEN PRESS - RACQUETBALL
14.00
55564
10/2/01
01311
P.E.R.A.
ER ID #6120- 00,01,51 - 9/28/01 P/R
37,388.94
55565
10/2/01
01289
PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS, INC.
SPRING PRAIRIE BURN
292.88
55566
10/2/01
01298
PRESENTATION HOMES LLP
FINAL ESCROW - CLOSE FUND 864
10,701.50
55567
10/2/01
01345
RAMSEY COUNTY
WASTE MGMT FEE
2,203.17
55568
10/2/01
01337
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
LAMPING SRVS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
68.55
LAMPING SRVS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
61.45
55569
10/2/01
01347
RAMSEY- WASHINGTON CABLE COMM
REPAIR VCR
150.77
55570
10/2/01
01358
REDWOOD SIGNS
CITY ENTRANCE SIGN
1,568.00
55571
10/2/01
01361
RENEE'S CAFE AND DELI
MEALS FOR TRAINING SESSIONS
381.46
55572
10/2/01
02209
SCOTT COUNTY COURT SERVICES
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONF
65.00
55573
10/2/01
02210
SMYTHE, WALTER C
CASH CONNECTION REFI ND
2,625.00
55574
10/2/01
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
RADIO MAINT - AUGUST
1,330.49
55575
10/2/01
01527
STEFFEN, SCOTT
UNIFORMS
47,99
TRAINING - LUNCH
7,22
55576
10/2/01
01560
SUPERIOR SERVICES INC
RECYCLING - AUGUST l
15,958.52
55577
10/2/01
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
PROJ 00 -05 PAYMENT #4
127 9 663.57
55578
10/2/01
01574
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
VARIOUS BITUMINOUS MATERIALS NO
1,700.93
55579
10/2/01
01590
TAYLOR, MARSHA
FITNESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT FEE
1,250.00
55580
10/2/01
01654
TRUGREEN- MAPLEWOOD #4635
LAWN SERVICE
755.09
55581
10/2/01
01580
TSE, INC.
JANITORIAL SRVS 7/12 TO 8/22
1,087.77
55582
10/2/01
01669
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
TOW FORFEITURE VEH
63.90
55583
10/2/01
01690
UNITED HOSPITAL
PRE - EMPLOYMENT SCREENING
260.00
55584
10/2/01
01709
VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL
DUMPSTERS
322.50
55585
10/2/01
01718
VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES
69.35
55586
10/2/01
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
2,045.00
55587
10/2/01
01759
WENGER, ROBERT
FALL CLEAN -UP - LUNCH FOR WORKER
27.51
55588
10/2/01
01793
XEROX CORPORATION
COPIER USAGE - AUG
296.08
55589
10/2/01
01807
ZWIEG, SUSAN
CHAIRS FOR STATION 2
85.00
83 Checks in this report Total checks : 881,780.18
5
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pam Description Amount
09/24/01
09/25/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
1
09/24/01
09/25/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
14,593.93
09/21/01
09/25/01
CBSA
Dental Claims
1
09/25/01
09/26/01
MN. State Treasurer
Drivers. License #697
801.94
09/25/01
09/26/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
13
09/26/01
09/27/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
768.75
09/26/01
09/27/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
12,441.84
09/27/01
09/28/01
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License #697
..799.00
09/27/01
09/28/01
MN State Treasurer
Deputy Registrar #149
7
TOTAL
�4�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
7
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
09/28/01
ALLENSPACH, SHERRY
339.27
dd
09/28/01
COLLINS, KENNETH
339.27
dd
09/28/01
KOPPEN, MARVIN
339.27
dd
09/28/01
FURSMAN, RICHARD
4
dd
09/28/01
MCGUIRE, MICHAEL
19,353.04
dd
09/28/01
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
251.25
dd
09/28/01
OSTER, ANDREA
1,555.14
dd
09/28/01
CARLSON, THERESE
1,870.23
dd
09/28/01
LE, SHERYL
3,361.92
dd
09/28/01
FAUST, DANIEL
3
dd
09/28/01
URBANSKI, HOLLY
1,525.54
dd
09/28/01
ANDERSON, CAROLE
870.45
dd
09/28/01
BAUMAN, GAYLE
2481.89
dd
09/28/01
JACKSON, MARY
1575.94
dd
09/28/01
KELSEY, CONNIE
691.90
dd
09/28/01
TETZLAFF, JUDY
1
dd
09/28/01
DARST, ROB ERTA
1,114.8 5
dd
09/28/01
FRY, PATRICIA
1
dd
09/28/01
GUILFOILE, KAREN
2,203.38
dd
09/28/01
CAROE, JEANETTE
1,464.53
dd
09/28/01
JAGOE, CAROL
1451.44
dd
09/28/01
JOHNSON, BONNIE
876.10
dd
09/28/01
OLSON, SANDRA
890.44
dd
09/28/01
WEAVER, KRISTINE
968.45
dd
09/28/01
CORCORAN, THERESA
1427.06
dd
09/28/01
MARTINSON, CAROL
1
dd
09/28/01
POWELL, PHILIP
1,793.07
dd
09/28/01
THOMALLA, DAVID
2,893.94
dd
09/28/01
WINGER, DONALD
3,612.64
dd
09/28/01
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2
dd
09/28/01
ANDREWS, SCOTT
2
dd
09/28/01
BAKKE, LONN
2,13 8.69
dd
09/28/01
BANICK, JOHN
2,743.10
dd
09/28/01
BELDE, STANLEY
2,267.84
dd
09/28/01
B OHL, JOHN
2
dd
09/28/01
BOWMAN, RICK
2,300.80
dd
09/28/01
BUSACK, DANIEL
1,761.01
dd
09/28/01
DOBLAR, RICHARD
1,570.34
dd
09/28/01
HALWEG, KEVIN
2
dd
09/28/01
HEINZ, STEPHEN
2,123.94
dd
09/28/01
HERBERT, MICHAEL
2
dd
09/28/01
HIEBERT, STEVEN
2
dd
09/28/01
JOHNSON, KEVIN
2
dd
09/28/01
KARTS, FLINT
2
7
1�66
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
r
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
09/28/01
KROLL, BRETT
1
dd
09/28/01
KVAM, DAVID
2,311.31
dd
09/28/01
LARSON, DANIEL
1
dd
09/28/01
LU, JOHNNIE
1,548.43
dd
09/28/01
MARINO, JASON
1,378.90
dd
09/28/01
MARTIN, JERROLD
1
dd
09/28/01
OLSON, JULIE
1
dd
09/28/01
PIKE, GARY
2,533.61
dd
09/28/01
RA.BBETT, KEVIN
2
dd
09/28/01
STEFFEN, SCOTT
2,504.76
dd
09/28/01
STOCKTON, DERRELL
2,123.94
dd
09/28/01
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,493.37
dd
09/28/01
WATCZAK, LAURA
2
dd
09/28/01
WENZEL, JAY
1
dd
09/28/01
BERGERON, JOSEPH
2,587.44
dd
09/28/01
CROTTY, KERRY
2,175.79
dd
09/28/01
DUNN, ALICE
2,220.80
dd
09/28/01
ERICKSON, VIRGINIA
2,214.64
dd
09/28/01
EVERSON, PAUL
1,910.52
dd
09/28/01
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2,104.74
dd
09/28/01
FRASER, JOHN
2,516.37
dd
09/28/01
HALWEG, JODI
i
1
dd
09/28/01
MORNING, TIMOTHY
L538.69
dd
09/28/01
PALMA, STEVEN
2,355.05
dd
09/28/01
PARSONS, KURT
1
dd
09/28/01
ROSSMAN, DAVID
2
dd
09/28/01
THIENES, PAUL
2
dd
09/28/01
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2
dd
09/28/01
PACOLT, MARSHA
1
dd
09/28/01
CALLAHAN, COLLEEN
1,860.93
dd
09/28/01
SPANGLER, EDNA
571.78
dd,
09/28/01
LUKIN, STEVEN
3
dd
09/28/01
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
2
dd
09/28/01
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1,692.52
dd
09/28/01
AHL, R. CHARLES
3
dd
09/28/01
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
1
dd
09/28/01
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1,385.54
dd
09/28/01
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1
dd
09/28/01
KANE, MICHAEL
2
dd
09/28/01
LUND STEN, LANCE
2,544.51
dd
09/28/01
LUTZ, DAVID
1,965.34
dd
09/28/01
MEYER, GERALD
1,749.76
dd
09/28/01
NAGEL, BRYAN
1,621.94
dd
09/28/01
OSWALD, ERICK
1
dd
09/28/01
TEVLIN, TODD
1,270.34
dd
09/28/01
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER
2,634.33
1�66
E
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
09/28/01
DUCHARME, JOHN
2,074.58
dd
09/28/01
PECK, DENNIS
2,210.40
dd
09/28/01
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,903.62
dd
09/28/01
ANDERSON, BRUCE
3
dd
09/28/01
D OHERTY, KATHLEEN
L554.34
dd
09/28/01
MARUSKA, MARK
2,235.14
dd
09/28/01
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1
dd
09/28/01
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET
1,042.21
dd
09/28/01
HORSNELL, JUDITH
1,515.68
dd
09/28/01
KOS, HEATHER
1,042.65
dd
09/28/01
NELSON, JEAN
969.01
dd
09/28/01
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
1,510.34
dd
09/28/01
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3,413.40
dd
09/28/01
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
2
dd
09/28/01
KROLL, LISA
907.47
dd
09/28/01
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
863.00
dd
09/28/01
SINDT, ANDREA
1,226.34
dd
09/28/01
THOMPSON, DEBRA
746.55
dd
09/28/01
YOUNG, TAMELA
1
dd
09/28/01
BERGO, CHAD
1
:dd
09/28/01
FINWALL, SHANN
1,736.40
dd
09/28/01
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2,164.68
dd
09/28/01
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2,151.14
dd
09/28/01
FISHER, DAVID
2
dd
09/28/01
ANZALDI, MANDY
203.00
dd
09/28/01
FLUG, MEGAN
66.00
dd
09/28/01
GRAF, MICHAEL
1
dd
09/28/01
KELLY, LISA
968.48
dd
09/28/01
ROBBINS, AUDRA
1
dd
09/28/01
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,272.59
dd
09/28/01
BREHEIM, ROGER
1
dd
09/28/01
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,861.30
dd
09/28/01
OTIS, MARY ELLEN
548.46
dd
09/28/01
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
1
dd
09/28/01
COLEMAN, PHILIP
323.04
dd
09/28/01
CROSSON, LINDA
1,881.54
dd
09/28/01
EASTMAN, THOMAS
2,195.14
dd
09/28/01
ERICKSON, KYLE
559.11
dd
09/28/01
HERSOM, HEIDI
1,516.74
dd
09/28/01
MCCLUNG, HEATHER
572.09
dd
09/28/01
RODEN, AARON
476.94
dd
09/28/01
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,472.00
dd
09/28/01
ATKINS, KATHERINE
85.32
dd
09/28/01
CORNER, AMY
60.30
dd
09/28/01
HASSENSTAB, DENISE
138.75
dd
09/28/01
HORWATH, RONALD
1,18 5.54
E
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
10
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
09/28/01
KOEHNEN, AMY
19.80
dd
09/28/01
MARUSKA, ERICA
109.60
dd
09/28/01
WHITE, NICOLE
190.09
dd
09/28/01
WHITE, NICOLE
59.72
dd
09/28/01
W ORWA, LINDSAY
252.55
dd
09/28/01
RENSLOW, RITA
269.70
dd
09/28/01
REILLY, MICHAEL
1,268.74
dd
09/28/01
SCHLINGMAN, PAUL
1 9 882.34
dd
09/28/0.1
SEEGER, GERALD
435.55
dd
09/28/01 `
STEINHORST, JEFFREY
715.15
dd
09/28/01
SWANSON, LYLE
1,570.62
dd
09/28/01
YOUNG, DILLON
649.28
dd
09/28/01
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2,314.62
wf
85641
09/28/01
CARDINAL, ROBERT.
385.50
wf
85642
09/28/01
WASILUK, JULIE
339.27
wf
85643
09/28/01
INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS
150.00
wf
85644
09/28/01
CUDE, LARRY
403.46
wf
85645
09/28/01
GENNOW, PAMELA
415.00
wf
85646
09/28/01
MATHEYS, ALANA
1,679.31
wf
85647
09/28/01
HANSEN, LORI
1,598.96
wf
85648
09/28/01
VIETOR, LORR.AINE
1 3 591.52
wf
85649
09/28/01
BARTELT, JOAN
132.00
wf
85650
09/28/01
BEHM, GERALD
153.00
wf
85651
09/28/01
BELLAND, JAIME
136.00
wf
85652
09/28/01
BERGER, CAROLE
140.00
wf
85653
09/28/01
BERGER, MERVIN
175.50
wf
85654
09/28/01
BUNDE, JENNETTE
132.00
wf
85655
09/28/01
CAHANES, LUCILLE
153.00
wf
85656
09/28/01
COKLEY, MARGARET
134.00
wf
85657
09/28/01
COTTRELL, JOAN
162.00
wf
85658
09/28/01
DAVIDSON, MAE
134.00
wf
85659
09/28/01
DEHEN, VIRGINIA
148.50
wf
85660
09/28/01
DELMONTE, BERNICE
136.00
wf
85661
09/28/01
DICKSON, HELEN
64.00
wf
85662
09/28/01
DITTEL, KATHLEEN
128.00
wf
85663
09/28/01
DORNFELD, GRACE
132.00
wf
85664
09/28/01
DROEGER, DIANE
140.00
wf
85665
09/28/01
DUCHARME, FRED
153.00
wf
85666
09/28/01
DUELLMAN, AUDREY
153.00
wf
85667
09/28/01
EDDY, BETTY
175.50
wf
85668
09/28/01
EICKHOFF, CAROLYN
64.00
wf
85669
09/28/01
EINEKE, JOHN
153.00
wf
85670
09/28/01
FISCHER, LORRAINE
171.00
wf
85671
09/28/01
FISCHER, MARY
136.00
wf
85672
09/28/01
FITZGERALD, DELORES
132.00
wf
85673
09/28/01
FOSBURGH, ANNE
171.00
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
11
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
85674
09/28/01
FREDERICKSON, RITA
136.00
wf
85675
09/28/01
GILSTAD, MARK
120.00
Wf
85676
09/28/01
GOLASKI, DIANE
132.00
Wf
85677
09/28/01
GRANGER, BETTY
80.00
Wf
85678
09/28/01
GRANT, GUY
128.00
Wf
85679
09/28/01
HAMRE, CAROL
132.00
Wf
85680
09/28/01
HAMRE, RONALD
132.00
Wf
85681
09/28/01
HAYDE, WALTER
132.00
wf
85682
09/28/01
HAYNE, JACQUELINE
72.00
Wf
85683
09/28/01
HENRY, JOHN
118.00
Wf
85684
09/28/01
HENSLEY, PATRICIA
136.00
Wf
85685
09/28/01
HINES, CONSTANCE
132.00
Wf
85686
09/28/01
HOGAN, ANNA
132.00
Wf
85687
09/28/01
HORTON, SHIRLEE
132.00
Wf
85688
09/28/01
IVERSEN, MILDRED
132.00
Wf
85689
09/28/01
JANACEK, JEFFREY
120.00
Wf
85690
09/28/01
JOHNSON, BARBARA
72.00
Wf
85691
09/28/01
KANDLER, DOROTHEA
116.00
Wf
85692
09/28/01
KING, HELEN
132.00
Wf
85693
09/2 8/01
KOCKELMAN, : RON
136.00
Wf
85694
09/28/01
KOLASA, JOAN
136.00
Wf
85695
09/28/01
KOLASA, JOSEPH
136.00
Wf
85696
09/28/01
KREKELBERG, MONA
136.00
Wf
85697
09/28/01
KUNDE, MARGARET
112.00
wf
85698
09/28/01
LACKNER, MARVELLA
132.00
Wf
85699
09/28/01
LALLY, RITA
153.00
Wf
85700
09/28/01
LAUREN, LORRAINE
130.00
Wf
85701
09/28/01
LING, THELMA
156.00
Wf
85702
09/28/01
LOFGREN, DELORES
74.00
Wf
85703
09/28/01
LOFGREN, RICHARD
175.50
Wf
85704
09/2 8/01
LUTTRELL, SHIRLEY
15 7.5 0
Wf
85705
09/2 8/01
MAHRE, CAROL
157.50
Wf
85706
09/28/01
MANDERS, ROSE
92.00
Wf
85707
09/28/01
MARK.IE, CLAIRE
128.00
Wf
85708
09/28/01
MARSH, DELORES
132.00
wf
85709
09/28/01
MEYER, JACQUELINE
116.00
Wf
85710
09/28/01
MISGEN, JOAN
132.00
Wf
85711
09/2 8/01
MOLLERS, KATHERINE
136.00
Wf
85712
09/28/01
MOSSONG, BETTY
136.00
Wf
85713
09/28/01
MURASKI, HOWARD
132.00
Wf
85714
09/28/01
NELSON, BARBARA
128.00
wf
85715
09/28/01
NIEMAN, JAMES
80.00
Wf
85716
09/28/01
NIETERS, LOUISE
152.00
Wf
85717
09/28/01
NORMAN, NEVA
136.00
Wf
85718
09/28/01
OGILVIE, BEVERLY
64.00
wf
85719
09/28/01
PAULEY, PHYLLIS
152.00
11
i
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
85720
09/28/01
PETERSEN, KARYL
128.00
Wf
85721
09/28/01
PETSCHEL, LORRAINE
153.00
Wf
85722
09/28/01
ROSSI, ROSE
134.00
Wf
85723
09/28/01
RUDEEN, ELAINE
132.00
Wf
85724
09/28/01
SAJEVIC, FLORENCE
132.00
Wf
85725
09/28/01
SCHAAF, LARRY
142.00
Wf
85726
09/28/01
SCHNEIDER, MARY
132.00
Wf
85727
09/28/01
SCHROEPFER, DONALD
136.00
Wf
85728
09/28/01
SCHROEPFER, HARRIET
132.00
Wf
85729
09/28/01
SKLUZACEK, EVELYN
116.00
Wf
85730
09/28/01
SPIES, LOUIS
136.00
Wf
85731
09/28/01
SULLIVAN, KENNETH
132.00
Wf
85732
09/28/01
SULLIVAN, THERESA
132.00
Wf
85733
09/28/01
TAYLOR, LORRAINE
132.00
Wf
85734
09/28/01
TAYLOR, RITA
112.00
Wf
85735
09/28/01
THOMPSON, MILO
162.00
wf
85736
09/28/01
THOMPSON, PATRICIA
153.00
Wf
85737
09/28/01
TOLBERT, D- FRANKLIN
136.00
Wf
85738
09/28/01
TOMASZEWSKI, CARMEN
96.00
Wf
85739
09/28/01
TROOIEN, GERALDINE
132.00
Wf
85740
09/28/01
TUCKER, CECILIA
140.00
Wf
85741
09/28/01
VANDEVEER, BARBARA
64.00
Wf
85742
09/28/01
VATNE, MARY
72.00
Wf
85743
09/28/01
WANDERSEE, GENE
80.00
Wf
85744
09/28/01
WASMUNDT, GAYLE
116.00
Wf
85745
09/28/01
WILLY, JOHN
132.00
Wf
85746
09/28/01
PALANK, MARY
1,831.19
Wf
85747
09/28/01
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,582.39
Wf
85748
09/28/01
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
2,045.70
Wf
85749
09/28/01
TICHY, PAMELA
42.00
Wf
85750
09/28/01
BARTZ, PAUL
2,009.54
. wf
85751
09/28/01
HALEY, BRANDON
1,378.90
Wf
85752
09/28/01
KONG, TOMMY
1,677.44
Wf
85753
09/28/01
MAYNARD, WILLIAM
264.00
Wf
85754
09/28/01
STEINER, JOSEPH
180.00
Wf
85755
09/28/01
STEVENS, ERIC
198.00
Wf
85756
09/28/01
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2,219.68
Wf
85757
09/28/01
MEEHAN, JAMES
2
Wf
85758
09/28/01
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
2
Wf
85759
09/28/01
SCHWAB, TAHIRAH
377.25
Wf
85760
09/28/01
NIVEN, AMY
630.70
Wf
.85761
09/28/01
WEGWERTH, JUDITH
1
Wf
85762
09/28/01
FREBERG, RONALD
1
Wf
85763
09/28/01
JONES, DONALD
1,395.94
Wf
85764
09/28/01
ELIAS, JAMES
2
Wf
85765
09/28/01
LINDBLOM, RANDAL
2,375.99
i
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
s
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
i
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
85766
09/28/01
CARVER, JUSTIN
346.50
Wf
85767
09/28/01
EDSON, DAVID
1
Wf
85768
09/28/01
HELEY, ROLAND
1
Wf
85769
09/28/01
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1,818.42
Wf
85770
09/28/01
LINDORFF, DENNIS
109.54
Wf
85771
09/28/01
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1
Wf
85772
09/28/01
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,395.94
Wf
85773
09/28/01
O'DONOVAN, KEVIN
465.00
Wf
85774
09/28/01
GERNES, CAROLE
480.00
Wf
85775
09/28/01
SOUTTER, CHRISTINE
57.38
Wf
85776
09/28/01
WORDEN, KRISTEN
143.75
Wf
85777
09/28/01
BUNCE, LARRY
1,645.54
Wf
85778
09/28/01
WENGER, ROBERT
2,109.54
wf
85779
09/28/01
BELLO, ANTHONY
60.00
Wf
85780
09/28/01
BJORK, BRANDON
170.63
Wf
85781
09/28/01
CHURCHILL, DAVID
11.50
Wf
85782
09/28/01
CICCHESE, JOSEPH
93.00
Wf
85783
09/28/01
CONLIN, NICOLE
30.75
Wf
85784
09/28/01
DEMARRE, CAMEO
88.00
Wf
85785
09/28/01
FINN, GREGORY
1
Wf
85786
09/28/01
FRANK, LAURA
170.00
Wf
85787
09/28/01
FRANK, STEVE
184.00
Wf
85788
09/28/01
GIANNINI, JOSEPH
36.00
Wf
85789
09/28/01
GRANDPRE, PATRICK
39.00
Wf
85790
09/28/01
HEI, MATTHEW
20.50
Wf
85791
09/28/01
HYSTEAD, BRENT
49.00
wf
85792
09/28/01
JONDAHL, ERIN
42.00
Wf
85793
09/28/01
KLEM, JOSH
200.00
Wf
85794
09/28/01
KRIER, DANIEL
40.00
Wf
85795
09/28/01
KRIER, JOHN
40.00
Wf
85796
09/28/01
LO, CHUEPHENG
65.00
Wf
85797
09/28/01
LO, SAO
25.00
Wf
85798
09/28/01
LUSHANKO, ADAM
28.00
Wf
85799
09/28/01
MARCHETTI, JACKIE
51.25
Wf
85800
09/2 8/01
MARCHETTI, JIMMY
30.00
Wf
85801
09/28/01
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
34.00
Wf
85802
09/2 8/01
RICE, DANIEL
52.00
Wf
85803
09/28/01
SHOBERG, KARI
63.44
Wf
85804
09/28/01
UNGAR, KRISTOPHER
30.25
Wf
85805
09/28/01
VANDERZANDEN, MARK
30.75
Wf
85806
09/28/01
WEGNER, CHRISTOPHER
41.00
Wf
85807
09/28/01
WOLTERS, GRANT
93.00
Wf
85808
09/28/01
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,628.80
wf
85809
09/28/01
HAAG, MARK
1,279.94
Wf
85810
09/28/01
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,235.14
Wf
85811
09/28/01
GLASS, JEAN
1,070.28
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
14
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
85812
09/28/01
HABLE, NATASHA
308.85
wf
85813
09/28/01
HOIUM, SHEILA
899.93
wf
85814
09/28/01
MOY, PAMELA
286.43
wf
85815
09/28/01
PARTLOW, JOSHUA
248.50
wf
85816
09/28/01
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
1
wf
85817
09/28/01
SHOBERG, CARY
650.72
wf
85818
09/28/01
LINGER, MARGARET
668.36
wf
85819
09/28/01
VELASQUEZ, ANGELA
.303.34
wf
85820
09/28/01
BACHMAN, NICOLE
92.97
wf
85821
09/28/01
BERINGER, JASON
519.69
wf
85822
09/28/01
BRENEMAN, NEIL
82.27
wf
85823
09/28/01
BURGESS, JOHN
61.75
wf
85823
09/28/01
BURGESS, JOHN
71.50
wf
85824
09/28/01
CHAPMAN, JENNY
340.55
wf
85825
09/28/01
CMIEL, NICHOLAS
10.35
wf
85826
09/28/01
COSTA, JOSEPH
360.00
wf
85827
09/28/01
DEGRAW, KRYSTAL,
520.12
wf
85827
09/28/01
DEGRAW, KRYSTAL
145.50
wf
85828
09/28/01
DEMPSEY, BETH
124.30
Wf
85829
09/28/01
DIERICH, ANDREA
26.00
wf
85830
09/28/01
DUNK, RYAN
117.00
wf
85831
09/28/01
FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA
50.63
wf
85832
09/28/01
FONTAINE, KIM
46.20
wf
85832
09/28/01
FONTAINE, KIM
158.40
wf
85833
09/28/01
GREENWALT, SARAH
375.20
wf
85833
09/28/01
GREENWALT, SARAH
282.20
wf
85834
09/2 8/01
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
3 65.18
wf
85835
09/2 8/01
HAGGERTY, KATHRYN
14.40
wf
85836
09/28/01
HAWKE, ASHLEY
'288.56
wf
85837
09/28/01
HEINN, REBECCA
404.73 .
wf
85838
09/2 8/01
HEXUM, AMANDA
18.00
wf
85839
09/28/01
HOLMGREN, LEAH
152.00
wf
85840
09/28/01
HOULE, DENISE
155.43
wf
85841
09/28/01
IRISH, KARL
109.60
wf
85842
09/28/01
JOHNSON, ROBERT
211.75
wf
85843
09/28/01
JOYER, MARTI
29.25
wf
85844
09/28/01
KOEHNEN, MARY
567.68
wf
85845
09/28/01
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
45.50
wf
85846
09/28/01
MCMAHON, MELISSA
95.88
wf
85847
09/28/01
MILLS, ANNE
9.75
wf
85848
09/28/01
MOSSONG, ANDREA
316.80
wf
85849
09/28/01
PEHOSKI, CAITLIN
100.75
wf
85850
09/28/01
PEHOSKI, JOEL
118.80
wf
85851
09/2 8/01
SMITLEY, SHARON
206.00
wf
85852
09/28/01
SWANER, JESSICA
493.39
wf
85853
09/28/01
TUPY, MARCUS
108.00
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
15
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
85854
09/28/01
WARNER, CAROLYN
217.60
wf
85855
09/28/01
WEDES, CARYL
135.75
Wf
85856
09/28/01
WOODMAN, ALICE
226.73
Wf
85857
09/28/01
BOSLEY, CAROL
147.05
Wf
85858
09/28/01
ERVIN, EMILY
73.50
wf
85859
09/28/01
ESALA, HOPE
27.00
Wf
85860
09/28/01
GROPPOLI, LINDA
223.50
Wf
85861
09/28/01
HANSEN, ANNA
90.45
wf
85862
09/28/01
HUPPERT, ERICA
194.70
Wf
85863
09/28/01
KONECZNY, JENNA`
12.00
Wf
85864
09/28/01
LARKIN, JENNIFER
9.75
Wf
85865
09/28/01
SCHROEDER, KATHLEEN
347.60
Wf
85866
09/28/01
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
164.40
Wf
85867
09/28/01
VAN HALE,: PAULA
39.00
Wf
..85$68
09/28/01
BEHAN, JAMES
1
Wf
85869
09/28/01
DIXON, NICOLE
50.80
Wf
85870
09/28/01
DOUGLASS, TOM
349.00
Wf
85871
09/28/01
HEGG, MICHELLE
88.90
Wf
85872
09/28/01
JAHN, DAVID
1
Wf
85873
09/28/01
KOSKI, JOHN
1,032.66
Wf
85874
09/28/01
KYRK, ASHLEY
145.95
Wf
85875
09/28/01
LESLIE, DUSTIN
191.80
Wf
85876
09/28/01
LONETTI, JAMES
821.87
Wf
85877
09/28/01
MORIN, TROY
168.00
Wf
85878
09/28/01
PATTERSON, ALBERT
845.27
Wf
85 879
09/28/01
PETERSON, LYND SAY
39.90
Wf
85880
09/28/01
PRINS, KELLY
322.40
Wf
85881
09/28/01
RISTOW, JONATHAN
172.90
wf
85882
09/28/01
SARPONG, SEAN
152.95
Wf
85883
09/28/01
SCHMIDT, WILLIAM
95.25
Wf
85884
09/28/01
SEVERSON, HOLLY
139.65
Wf
85885
09/28/01
AICHELE, CRAIG
1,441.54
wf
85886
09/28/01
MULVANEY, DENNIS
1
Wf
85887
09/28/01
PR.IEM, STEVEN
1
367,999.90
15
AGENDA ITEM
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: October 1, 2001
RE: Donation of Equipment to the Historical Society
Action by Coup
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Recently the City replaced its folding machine with a new and updated one. Due to the
high volume of use, the former machine was often in need of maintenance and due to the
age of the machine the maintenance contract was very costly.
The Historical Society has expressed interest in the machine. It is recommended that
Council approve donating the machine to the Historical Society with the understanding that
they would be responsible for any future repairs to the equipment.
AGENDA ITEM NOowwwm 6 L 5.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: October 1, 2001
RE: Certification of Election Judges
�_-.-.
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELECTION JUDGES
RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of
Election Judges for the 2001 General Election, being held on Tuesday, November 6, 2001:
PRECINCT NO. 1
PRECINCT NO.5
PRECINCT NO. 9
Audrey Duellman
Anne Cardenas
Elsie Anderson
Joan Kolasa
Diane Droeger
Bernice Del Monte
Marvella Lackner
Marge Dvorak
Pat Hensley
Louise Nieters
Betty Eddy
Katherine Mollers
Harriet Schroepfer
Shirly Evertz
Lorraine Petschel
Thelma Ling
Barbara Vandeveer
PRECINCT NO.2
Patricia Trumble
Betty Granger
Cecilia Tucker
PRECINCT NO. 10
Jacqueline Hayne
Joan Cottrell
Barbara Johnson
PRECINCT NO. 6
Ann Fallon
Joseph Kolasa
Joan Button
Betty Haas
Rose Marie Manders
Margaret Cokley
Mona Krekelberg
Esther Maudal
Mae Davidson
Neva Norman
James Nieman
John Henry
Marlene Reitmann
Elizabeth Olson
Richard Lambert
D. Franklin Tolbert
Jacque Phillippi
William Little
Milo Thompson
Carol Mahre
PRECINCT NO. 11
RoseMarie Rossi
Lorraine Fischer
PRECINCT NO.3
Mary Fischer
Jaime Belland
PRECINCT NO.7
Rita Fredrickson
Pat Blank
Jeanette Bunde
Betty Mossong
Jean Dickson
Ron Kockelman
Louis Spies
Kathy Dittle
Rita Lally
Jeff Janacek
Howard Muraski
PRECINCT NO. 12
Rosemary Koch
Mary Ann Schneider
Lucille Cahanes
Pat Thompson
Don Schroepfer
Jennifer Hollerbach
Carmen Tomaszewski
Bob Spangler
Margaret Kunde
Gene Wandersee
Jackie Meyer
PRECINCT NO. 8
Arthur Mollica
PRECINCT NO.4
Gerald Behm
Beverly Ogilvie
Geraldine Callahan
John Eineke
Phyllis Pauly
Grace Dornfeld
Bob Flood
Larry Schaaf
Fred DuCharme
Bevery Gelao
Evelyn Skluzacek
Walter Hayde
Shirley Horton
Barbara Leiter
Claire Markie
PRECINCT NO. 13
Joan Misgen
Karyl Petersen
Donna Brown
David Pehl
Rita Taylor
Anne Fosburgh
Lorraine Rosauer
Sandra Wittmann
Mark Gilstad
Mary Vante
Diane Golaske
John Willy
Anna Mae Hogan
Don Jungmann
Thomas Maskrey
Lorraine Taylor
PRECINCT NO. 14
Shirley Luttrell
Carol Berger
Constance Hines
Helen King
Anita Larson
Delores Lofgren
Kenneth Sullivan
PRECINCT NO. 15
Delores Fitzgerald
Guy Grant
Carol Hamre
Lorraine Lauren
Richard Lofgren
Delores Marsch
Elaine Rudeen
Florence Sajevic
Theresa Sullivan
Geraldine Trooien
PRECINCT NO. 16
Joan Bartelt
Mery Berger
Carolyn Eickhoff
Mary Grant
Ronald Hamre
Mildred Iversen
Gayle Wasmundt
MEMORANDUM
T0: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk'
DATE: October 1, 2001
RE: Fee Waiver-Explorer Scouts
AGENDA ITEM
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed -
�4odified
Rejected
The Ramsey County Sheriff Department Explorer Post #2 will be participating in the
annual Fright Farm held at the Ramsey County Fairgrounds at the end of October. The
Explorers will sell hot cider, coffee and popcorn to participants.
This will be a fundraiser for the Scouts to earn money for uniforms and supplies. The past
four years the council has waived the forty -three dollar temporary food permit fee for this
event. The Explorer's are requesting that the fee be waived again this year.
A ���
MEMORANDUM Action bY Council
TO: Richard Fursman, Cit Mana Date
Endorsed llllllllllllllllllll1111111111 I I I 11
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation Modified
Re*
DATE: October 1, 2001 for the October 8, 2001 Cit Council Meeting Uected
SUBJECT: Open Space Grant
INTRODUCTION
The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department submitted a partnership g rant throu the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in March 2001. The purpose of the g rant was to
restore the open space propert located at Woodl and Count Road D. The cit received notice
on Au 27, 2001, that the g rant had been funded effective September 6, 2001.
BACKGROUND
The cit submitted a g rant for $38,800 to restore the Woodl and Count Road D open space
propert The g rant entails reestablishin 15 acres of dr prairie and removin exotic and
non-native species. In addition, the g rant will provide for the restoration of three small prairie
remnants approximatel three to four acres in size and conductin public education tours to include,
but not limited to web site, open space materials, etc.
Enclosed is a cop of the ve anal and conceptual landscape desi for the Woodl
and Count Road D open space site. The Woodl and Count Road D site was selected due to
its major need for restoration and its proximit to the Bruentrup farm location. The g rant is a
matchin g rant with $19,400 to be received from the state. The cit will match it with in-kind labor
and services and also volunteer support. The g rant monies need to be expended b December
2002.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the cit receive the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources g rant in the
amount of $19,400 with the understandin that the cit match will be for in-kind labor and services
and also volunteer support. Staff further recommends that the finance director establish a separate
g rant fund throu the park development fund to monitor the cit expenditures.
kdNos
c: Dan Faust, Finance Director
Ginn Ga Open Space Coordinator
Agenda & 61-11
MEMORANDUM Action by C ouncil
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
D ate
Endorsed ��
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation . .
Mod
DATE: October 1 2001 for the October 8 200 Cit C ouncil Meeting Jectcd
, � ty C g
SUBJECT: Grant Reimbursement for Well Restoration at Frost Avenue and English Street
INTRODUCTION
The Maplewood City Council allocated $40,000 for sealing the well at the Frost and English open
space site. The 020 -foot well was located in June 2001 with new telemetry technology. The City
Council allocated the monies to close the well due to concerns of potential contamination.
BACKGROUND
The Parks and Recreation Commission explored the option of having the well open for observation,
testing and public use. All of these options were not feasible due to the quality of the well casing and
the expense to grout the well and meet today's public health standards..
The well has been formally capped and sealed by Johnson Brothers Well Drilling Company. The
final budget has not been received yet, but it will not exceed $20,000. In addition to the reduced
cost for sealing the well, our department has applied for and received two grants to seal the well.
RECOMMENDATION
The city has received a $6,000 grant from the Watershed District and a $3,000 grant from the state
public health department. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the $9,000 grant money
and authorize the finance director to allocate the $9,000 to the city's open space fund.
Should you have any questions, please contact parks and recreation director Bruce Anderson at
ext. 4573.
kdlwellgrant.mem
MDH- WELL M1 GMNT UNIT Fax : 651- 15 -0978 10 ' 01 13 : 5B P. i� 2
-Data: A g o s t 31 2001
Contractor City of Maplewood-
h
A'"TN&
ruce n erson 'r irlaf"t+ r the rC31�TRA T
Address: 1830 East COU Road B
Mp lewood Minnesota 55109
This la an agreement fir professiorial/teohnlcal services, to be into
The +��rrimie�i�nar �f tha tie art rpretaci pursuant to laves of the State of Minnesota. p Dep artment of Health (hereinafter the STATE), pursuant to !Minnes Statute •
empowered t� enter l�t� agree fir the provision of statutorily � � �.���� , ��
iden tified tMe read for the following s Y p a��rik�ed public; h ealth �ervi��es. The STATE hay
se rvices to be pe rformed, as no state employee i4 available or able
these tasks. p of pe rforming
By written acceptance below, the CONTRACTOR agrees to p erform th
conditions in this i�tar an � p e Scope of the ' Services within the terms and
t
� within the lirnifs �fi the. �iauses Specified in Attachment A w
incorpt�r�tte�i herein. The CONTRA mu high is attached hereto and
mus sign its approval in the designated sl"gnature block below an
original signed agreement and Its attachments to the addr��s � d)'e the
Down b�lc�w, prier �� the commencement of serv
The services to be prov under this agreement and their costs are:
To peMan enfly seal abandoned well. Mi
Northern �'ac ' �Jn� qua ��1
fAc Railroad ,hard at the southwest cor
and English Stre in Ma 1 � ��
p wood � Ramsey - COunty Mi nneSota ,
di'aMeter and approximately 580 feet deep,
The tntai amount th t
Number 233514, at
the i ntersecti on
the former
of Frost Avenue
I fie Orel T i 8 inches i n
a thv TOTE agrees to pa.y for the abo ve vi ces is � $*; 000 . - .GG �
an d other re' lmburseme its and their costs are: j + � Trav� a I
All w ork will be PGrf0rM0d from 9/4/ I t 12
For payment, p16aso submit an invoice to:
r rt Qroiom rt co ntact perzon's name An addra sa here
rancine LaFaretto
Minnesota Department of Nea l th
ana gement eotion
p,. Box 64975
t, Paul, Minnesota 55164 -097
Pte' 9I'DIo'
(11 S T1= AP ,f, :
Division Director
Date
(3) MDH Contract Coordinator:
Signature
Date
�) CONTRACTOR'S APPROVAL:
CONTRAOTOR certifies that the appropriate Person h OX uteri the
agrl t on behlalf of a CON � �R as required by applicable
2 0 0 1081 *Li . 'nrls_ n1 RYenna nao,
Signature
Tit e ., r
Date
Annual P IN ��L'�Il?CI11
August 27, 2001
Mr. Cliff Aichinger
Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District
1902 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Cliff:
This is a short note to follow -up on our phone conversation regarding the well at Frost and
English. The city has retained Johnson Well Drilling to cap the well and do the final cement
closure.
During the past eight months, the city has experienced a great deal of expense in first locating
.. P_ 9
the well and then drilling it out to its current depth of 620- lus feet. The estimated cost to
P close
i
the well s $8,000. The city has expended $9,000 to date in location, drilling and' excavation.
Please accept this communication as a formal request for funding to close the well. I
understand that the typical request is $8,000 to $5,000 for public wells. Given the size scope
P
and depth of this project, I wound like to formally request an $8,000 grant to offset the ci s
cost.
tY'
I will forward a copy of the final well estimate under separate cover from Johnson Well Drilling.
9
Should you have any questions regarding this request please contact me direct) at
y
(651)770-4573.
SaMOFC: Ande
Director of Parks and ec eation
BRUCE.K.ANDERSON@CI.MAP EWOOD.MN.US
kdlaichingr.ftr01
'J
c: Patrick Sarafolean, Health Dept
John Johnson, Johnson Well Drilling
Dan Faust, Finance Director
PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 . 651 -770-4570 FAX: 651 - 770 - 4506
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD MN 55109
1
f
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT b Comcil
jDW
TO: City Manag
Endo d
Id
FROM: Assistant City E Re,
y g Weer ___ ....... �,,
SUBJECT: Assessment Hearing, 7 p.m., Monday, October 8, 2001
Bush Avenue Improvements, City Project 01 -04
DATE: October 1, 2001
Introduction
Booklets for the proposed assessments have been provided separately as a supplement to the
agenda. The proposed assessments have been mailed out to the affected property owners,
providing them with the specific assessment information for their properties.
Background
The proposed assessments are the same as were outlined in the feasibility study and as were
presented at the neighborhood meeting. Staff will be holding a plan review open house on
Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at city hall to answer any questions and discuss the project prior
to the assessment hearing.
Alternatives
1. Approve the assessments and approve the project.
2. Disallow the assessments and cancel the project.
3. Disallow the assessments and revise project funding to be paid entirely from the property
tax levy.
Discussion
The first two options are based on preceding actions of the past. The city's pavement
management policy outlines equitable cost sharing between the benefiting properties and the
city. The third option would not be consistent with actions of the past.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached Resolution for the Adoption
of the Assessment Roll for the Bush Avenue Improvements, Project 01 -04.
jW
CIVIC
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the .city council has
met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of
Bush Avenue, from Stillwater Road to Bartelmy Lane, as described in the files of the city clerk as
Project 01 -04, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by
the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual- installments extending over a
period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in
January, 2002, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.3 percent per annum from the date of the
adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the
entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2001. To each
subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying
additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made,
upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on
the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions
relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be
served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but
which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council,
as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any
portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or
improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
City Manager
Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit
Salvation Army Lakewood Temple
2080 Woodlynn Avenue
October 1, 2001
INTRODUCTION'
Project Description
Agenda # 14
Action by Count "I
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
The Salvation Army is proposing to expand their building at 2080 Woodlynn Avenue in order to
improve their adult day care services. The addition proposed is 3,457 square feet. and will
.house an activity room, beauty shop, laundry facility, office, and storm shelter (see the maps on
pages 5 through 11).
Req uests
To construct this addition, the applicant is requesting that the city approve the following:
1. A conditional use permit to expand their adult day care center within residentially zoned
land.
2. Design review.
DISCUSSION
Background
On December 22, 1986, the city council approved two conditional use permits associated with
the Salvation Army's church and adult day care center (see attached 12/22/86 city council
minutes on pages 13 through 17).
Adult Day Care
The adult day care center caters to older adults with various health problems. The addition will
enable the center to increase services for the existing clients, but is not intended to create
space for additional clients.
The Salvation Army is licensed through the State of Minnesota and Ramsey County for up to 50
adults. In 1986 during the initial CUP process, the city did not condition a maximum number of
clients. However, since 1986 the Salvation Army has never serviced more than 38 clients, and
do not propose more than 38 Clients with the addition.
The hours of the adult day care center are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
There are currently four full -time and four part -time staff at the center. With the addition, three
new staff members will be hired.
Addition Design
The one -story addition proposed is 3,457 square feet and will be located on the southwest
corner of the existing building. The addition will be setback 87 feet from the adjacent south
residential properties and 73 feet from the Ariel Street right -of -way. The addition will match the
exterior materiels of the existing building including burnished masonry with glazed masonry
units.
Parking
All clients at the center are transported to and from the site. Therefore, parking for the center is
only needed for the employees and guests. The church requires one parking stall per four
seats. There are 225 seats within the church, for total required parking of 57 stalls.
There are 86 existing parking stalls. Two of them are handicap accessible. The parking is more
than adequate for the adult day care center as well as the church.
Dumpster Enclosure
The existing dumpster enclosure will be replaced with a larger enclosure constructed on the
west side of the addition, The enclosure will match the exterior materials of the existing building
and will be equipped with a 6 -foot high cedar gate.
Landscaping
Eight birch trees will be displaced by the proposed addition. The birch trees will be relocated on
the west and south side of the addition. No new landscaping is proposed for the site.
Lighting
One additional wall pack light is proposed for security above the dumpster enclosure.
CONCLUSION
The Salvation Army's adult day care center offers a valuable service to the citizens of
Maplewood and surrounding communities. It is one of the few adult day care centers within the
area that is housed outside of a nursing home, which is a more desirable environment for many
older adults. Staff commends the Salvation Army on their attempts to improve their services at
the center and feels that the expansion will prove a positive affect on the surrounding properties.
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
On September 17, 2001, the planning commission unanimously recommended approval of the
Salvation Array's request for a conditional use permit to expand an adult day care facility within
a residential zoning district.
On September 25, 2001, the community design review board unanimously recommended
approval of the plans date stamped August 24, 2001.
Salvation Army 2 October 1, 2001
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt the resolution on pages 18 and 19 approving a conditional use permit to expand
the Salvation Army's adult day care -Center at 2080 Woodlynn Avenue. Approval is
based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
a. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve; minor changes.
b. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of
council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
2. Approve the plans date- stamped August 24, 2001, for the construction of an addition to
the Salvation Army Lakewood Temple located at 2080 Woodlynn Avenue. The owner
shall do the following:
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
b. Submit grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans staff approval before
the city issues a building permit.
C. Complete the following before occupying the building:
(1) Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
(2) Relocate the eight birch trees which were displaced because of the
addition. The trees should be replanted on the west and south side of the
addition.
d. if any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
(1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
(2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June
1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of
occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
(3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any
unfinished work.
e. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
Salvation Army 3 October 1, 2001
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size: 151,586 square feet (3.5 acres)
Existing Land Use: Church and Adult Day Care Center
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Future Location of the Birch Glen Apartments (zoned PUD) and
Vacant Land (zoned F)
West: Plaza 3000 (zoned SC)
South: Single Family Homes (zoned R -2)
East: Cottages of Maplewood (zoned PUD)
PLANNING
Existing Land
Use Plan: Church
Existing Zoning: Farm (F)
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards.
Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 18 and 19.
APPLICATION DATE
We received the complete applications and plans for the Salvation Army's proposal on August 24,
2001. State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete
applications for a proposal. As such, city action is required on this proposal by October 23, 2001.
P:Sec2nlsalvation
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Landscape Plan
5. Grading Plan
6. Elevations
7. Floor Plan
8. Salvation Army Narrative Dated August 3, 2001
9. December 22, 1986, City Council Minutes
10. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
11. Plans Date Stamped August 24, 2001 (Separate Attachment)
Salvation Army 4 October 1, 2001
Attachment 1
Woodlynn Avenue
Mimi
(1)
� Salvation Army
+-+ Lakewood Temple
(/) 2080 Woodlynn Ave.
Lydia Avenue
Cottages of Maplewood
At
L Y
... �.• '.::..
t
an saw
N
Salvation Army Location Map
5
Attachment 2
OD
4�
/ 030
O
0
' wo
41a,003cp
J f o r /.O 33
tet. C1
Alta
g — o f IV
�,�T' ' '" •0 94.41' ,
d -
� N S
03o d- 0
r m 4. 7 t
4 r !o cw 4.41'
9 •
0
N all 4 �
(39)
( �! .3.9,
-- �� — «65.73 -•
3a� a9 13 •
329.31 7 h .��• COs
08 1 Q 2 0 3 N N 0 r E R AC E 13 14 15 1 N z
91 �c • �8� 19) �) 4 5 6 ^+ 9 10 I 1 t h 12 d � ( 3 l }
�2 2� �L 3� 4 �� 4) N (Z �) N �'�� � C�9) � � ` " � X25
tl• i
0 E
r
.S: • Z38.
d
135 GO t35 !3S GO 135' 135 G0 i 103.68' 1
10 25 a I _ ° 10 ° 0 1 ° o �- 0 1 0 in 1 '"
CL t, 103.75 94.
(Z4) 1(17) o ����o) (7) (2)
o 1+ -�, 19T7�•
� 9 ^ 2 U � , . 9 ay 2 2 3 ( ?5)
pos ! s ! Lr 13 Ld 13 �6 ' V rqb (� M o {2.3� " o s) 3 ° o ° s 2 m o. (7G) 8 �.
3 fo 8 8► w o 3 (3� a� o ;3 1 z O V1 3� r �8) m Q1 4 N
LCD T A xZ' v 4 .99 5f z .
�- (4)
�-,-� 7 �, 4 1 y54 ? 4 � -s4 4 4, ( 77)
2 0�
(30) '� AA (ZI m (Z •` �� 134.9
0 6 5 g (ltd "� 0 5 , a 5 5 0 (78 .
(t o o �� 1 6
3 134.94'
(3
1) 1
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
9
4
N
SITE PLAN
7
4
N
• 11 -F�-a�hmon+ �
Attachment 4
WOOOLYNN AVENUE
I
E
F—
W
c
W ,
a
f
S
� A
MKT — i
�yrl� ri � ��Kf1M4 p1_Nl�f
To V%JVNA•a A"a
twr
tsrr
� Oar
auv+� PROkXEO ADOfT1C* v►.,.� ■rc•
o r
�.< - , �.-
OJ
.t 9814- /A � < /j'. ^. t PATV E
� '� ��� \ •.
s •s cw
me sea
•
i A`QWtQtO i� MT
i G�c
hw � Oft 1 � N4 0- 1 G 1 IJK� C
1
90667
pie
r
LANDSCAPE PLAN
8
4
N
AttArhmanf q
WOODLYNN AVENUE
W
LU
to
t
Ih N
1 / i
� rl
1 1
/ I ! VOSTINO PMNOW
1 ! I DOSTIN3 BUU)O Q
/ i1 I 1
1
� , I
� 1 1
I �
1 alts I I
` 1
t ► f>100fT1Mf - �.. t 1
J f '
t 1 1 ! ' • / /' �. //� / -� , "/ � _ _ — - -140 _961_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— � `� � 1
/ 1
\ \ 1 1
GRADING PLAN 4"
9
N
V '. %
7
MULIctullillerl-L 10
0 OM TO mAr()q aer
GLAZW TO WATM &jj
'tit FMNSR MASMM t WAMI bar.
SOUTH ELEVATION
............. I I.,
WLAM 1 0 -0 0
Apo
"W
ROM CALAA
z
7
WEST ELEVATION
2. scmi
� =GM TO IATQ g 41,
PU F-!W ftAS—r. T % "T Cm Car
4MC QAM TO WAT01 001'.
ftomsmoom tp Tcm C"T / --M�F"58 ft^SMAG TOWATCn CO -
r mrm-mw -am
CAPPY
4 CALALK
;O!OtIL Aw.
�.t
4
04M STML
t
CLAM TO WA" D
EAST ELEVATION
sc" 1/8 V - 0 0
ELEVATIONS
10
,'^~-^'' -`~^-^~^ ~^^^ ^ -i- '^-= ' ''~^`'~"-'`^`'`"^"'~'`''-
Attaohment 7
FLOOR PLAN
I �i
AK VAL-j
In
ci
lb
Awl S-A
4 a sel
C I L
to
F(T)
End=
EEff
IL
FLOOR PLAN
I �i
Attachment 8
Proposed
Addition to the Adult Day Care Center
for the
Salvation Army Lakewood Temple
NARRATIVE
The -reasons for the expansion of our building is to improve our services that we
offer to our clietlts. Our clients are older adults with various health problems and
this expansion will enable us to improve services such as bathing, laundry, beauty
shop, handicap bathrooms and offices. This will also provide additional
programming area to relieve crowding and create a more pleasant environment.
We also have incorporated a 320 Sq.Ft. storm shelter designed per FEMA specifications
that will accommodate 40 to 50 people including those confined to wheel chairs. This
amount would adequately handle the Day Care facility.
This proposed addition of 3457 Sq. Ft. is only 1.1% of the existing 30,570 Sq. Ft. building
and should not adversely affect the neighbors nor the community but in turn will
enhance the lives of those that use it. The addition will match the exterior materials
of burnished masonry and glazed masonry units and be of the same height as the
south section at 14' -0 ". This addition is set back a distance of 78' -0 "± from the west
property line and 85' -0 "± from the south property line.
The addition shall be fire protected with an extension of the existing fire suppression
system. The main entry to this addition shall be through the existing south entry on
the east side which will also receive a canopy like the north entry to help protect the
clients during inclement weather.
As the clients do not drive and we only anticipate two to three additional staff, there
is no need to expand the parking as the parking was designed for Sunday services
and is much greater than any needs for the Day Care facility.
We proposed to relocate the eight trees on the site that are displaced by the proposed
addition and continue with the plantings and flower beds as we currently have
around the property.
The exterior lighting is existing and we will add security lighting only to the west
side at the new trash enclosure.
The grading on the site is very minimal and is confined to 15'± around the new
addition and the east portion of the west dri-%7 eway.
Thank You.
12
ATTACHMENT 9
�. 7 :10 P.M. P •�
lap Amendment and Conditional -Use Permit Ariel and Woodlynn
Salvation Army (4 Votes on Plan Amendment)
a. Mayor .'Greavu convened , the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
g g g
request of . Bo.ssardt Christenson Corporation for approval of an amendment of
j the comprehensive plan from RM, medium density residential to c, church and
approval of a conditional use permit for a church and adult daycare in an F,
farm residence district.
b. Director of Community - Deve-lopment Olson presented the Staff report.
. P
c. Commissioner Dave Whitcomb resented the Planning •
P ng Commission recommendation.
d. Mr. aohn Bossardt, Bossardt Christenson Corporation, s
spoke on behalf
P a o f the
Salvation Army proposal. .
e. Mayor Walt Winters, Salvation Army spoke on behalf of the request.
fo Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be heard for or against th -
g e
proposal. The following expressed their opinions:
George Rossbach, 1406 :E. County Road C .
g. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing.
h. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption: (Plan Amendment)
86 - 12 - 214
WHEREAS, Bossardt Christenson Corporation initiated an amendment to the
Maplewood Comprehensive Plan from RM, residential medium density to C,
church for property located at the southeast corner of Woodlynn Avenue -and
Ariel Street.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of this plan amendment is as follows:
1. The Maplewood Planning Commission held a public hearing on
Decerzher 15, 1956, to consider this plan amendment. Notice
thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons
present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and
present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended
to the City Council that said plan amendment be approved.
2. The Maplewood City Council considered said plan amendment on Decem-
ber 22, 1986. The Council considered reports and recommendations
from the Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described plan amendment be approved on the basis of the following
findings of fact:
1. Churches are typically located in residential districts.
s
2. Woodlynn Avenue is designated as a major collector street. This
designation allows for higher volumes of traffic.
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes - all.
i. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption (Conditional Use Permit)
86 -.12 -. 215
WHEREAS, Bossardt Christenson Corporation initiated a conditional use
permit for a Salvation Army Church and adult day -care facility at the
following-described property:
: .Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 the West 165 feet of the South 368
feet Section 2. Township 29, Range 22, and also that part of the North-
west 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 the West 527.26 feet of the East 263.63
feet of the South 320 feet lying south of Woodlynn and east of Ariel all
in Section 2, Township 29, Range 22.
This property is located at the southeasterly corner of Woodlynn Avenue
and Ariel Street.
11HEREAS, the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as
follows:
14
12/22
1. This conditional use permit was initiated by Bossardt Christenson
Corporation, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances.
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning
Commission on December 15, 1986. The Planning Commission recommended
to the City Council that said permit be approved.
3. The Maplewood City Council held a public hearing on December 22,
1986. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant - to law.
All .persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard and present written statements. The Council also considered
�- reports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commiss
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the
above- described conditional use permit be approved on the basis of the following
findings -of -fact:
1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehendive plan and with
the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detrimental
to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be
compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4. The use would not depreciate property values.
5. The use would not - be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present
and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, glare, smoke,
• dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking
needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties.
7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as
streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and Parks,
8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public
cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental
to the welfare of the City.
1
9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan, dated October 28, 1986 unless a change
is approved by the City's Community Design Review Board.
2. Installation of an adequate landscaping screen along the east and
south sides of the parking lot to satisfy the screening - criteria
required by code.
15 12/22
Seconded by Counc i lmembe r Anderson, Ayes - all,
j, Councilmember Bastian moved _approval of the site lan dated 10 -28 -86
for the Salvation Arm Church and adult day-care facility, subject to the
following conditions
1. Approval of a land use plan amendment and conditional use permit by
the City Council.
2. Approval of plans by the Community Design Review Board does not
constitute approval of a building permit.
3. Any outdoor trash dumpsters shall be stored in screening enclosures
with a 100% opaque wooden gate and shall be a color and material
compatible with the building. Enclosures shall be protected by
concrete- filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the
ground at the front corners of the structure. If the enclosure is
masonry, the protective posts may be omitted.
4. Any exterior building or roof -top equipment shall be decoratively
screened and hidden from view. The screening material is subject
to Staff approval.
a. If any of the structures are damaged, they shall be
repaired as soon as possible but in no event longer than
90 days.
5. An erosion control plan, acceptable to the City Engineer, shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit for erosion
control during construction.
6. Parking areas shall be striped and all bituminous areas shall have
continuous concrete curbing. Parking lots shall be kept in a con-
tinual state of repair.
7. If construction has not begun within two years of approval, boaed
review shall be repeated.
8. Site security lighting shall be provided and shall be directed or
shielded so not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or
roadways.
9. If any adjacent property is disturbed or property irons removed due
j to construction of the site, that property shall be restored and
irons replaced by the applicant. "
10. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be subject to the City
Engineer' s approval.
11. The applicant shall provide a monetary guarantee, in a form accept-
able to Staff, in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost of any
site improvements' that .are :.nct completdd' by occupancy
12/22
T1
. f`'• I � 1 •, 11 r,
12. `Thj,s approval, is for the' 'ite plan only, A landscaping plan and
building elevations must stall be approved.
13 Landscaping an ee '
d screening shall be required on the east and south
sides of the parking lot to prevent headlight glare and to provide
a buffer. Screening shall be done in accordance with City, ordi-
nance and will provide a .buffer consisting of a berm on the east
and south property lines and as far as the berm, the C . D . R. B , will
specify the actual height ' and screen plantings on the berm.
i
►
14, sto p signs s shall be provided at all exits..:
15 Sidewalks shall be installed. on Ari.el and on Woodlynn up to the
parking lot,
Seconded by Councilmember Anderson. Ayes all.
17
ATTACHMENT 10
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Salvation Army Lakewood Temple applied for a conditional use permit for
the expansion of their church and adult day care center within residentially zoned property;
. WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2080 Woodlynn Avenue. The legal
description is:
NW '/ of the NE % of the W 165 feet of the S 368 feet of Section 2, Township 29, Range
22, grid also that part of NW % of the NE ,% of the W 527.26 feet of the E 263.63 feet of the
S 320 feet lying south of Woodlynn and E of Ariel all in Section 2, Township 23, Range 22.
(Property Identification Number: 02- 29- 22 -12- 0043)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On October 8, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit
because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or Other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
18
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 2001.
19
DRAFT
'AINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2001
Salvation Army Church Conditional Use Permit
(2080 Woodlyn Avenue)
The Salvation Army is proposing to expand their building in order to improve their adult day care
services. The proposed addition is 3,457- square -feet and will house an activity room, beauty
shop, laundry facility, office, and storm shelter. To construct this addition, the applicants are
requesting a conditional use permit to expand the adult day care center within residentially zoned
land and design approval.
The adult day care center caters to older adults with various health problems. The addition will
enable the center to increase services for the existing clients, but is not intended to create space
for additional clients. The State of Minnesota and Ramsey County have licensed the center for
up 50 adults, but the center has never had nor do they propose more than 38 adults.
The hours of the adult day care center are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. There
are currently four full -time and four part -time staff at the center. With the addition, three additional
staff members will be hired.
The one -story addition proposed is 3,457- square -feet and will be located on the southwest corner
of the existing building. The addition will be setback 87 feet from the adjacent south residential
p
.ro p erties and 73 feet from the Ariel Street right -of -way. The addition will match the exterior
materials of the existing building including burnished masonry with glazed masonry.
Commissioner Rossbach asked staff if any surveys were sent out to neighbors for their
comments?
Ms. Finwall stated a neighborhood survey was not sent out, although they will be notifying the
neighbors of the public hearing for the city council meeting on October 8, 2001.
Chairperson Fischer asked staff to correct the spelling on page 5 of Aerial Street to Ariel Street.
Ms. Finwall replied thank you.
Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to come forward.
The architect for the Salvation Army, Ken Nordby of NAI Architects came forward. Mr. Nordby
said he would be happy to answer any questions regarding the building additions.
Commissioner Rossbach stated he had a question for someone representing the Salvation Army.
John Grambush representing the Salvation Army came forward.
Commissioner Rossbach asked for clarification in a point in the staff report, it states that the
buildin g has the capacity for 50 adults but the plans are not to have more than 38 adults. He
asked if that would be limiting the Salvation Army in the future?
Mr. Grambush stated 11 years ago when the adult day care center began, they came up with an
arbitrary figure of 50 adu'ts and then were approved for that spacing. The Salvation Army
operates right now with 38 adults and they don't propose additional clients.
Commissioner Rossbach said his concern is that somebody might come back to the Salvation
Army down the road and say even though it was said the total would be 38 adults you still have
the capacity for 50 adults. He asked Mr. Grambush if he thought the number 38 should be
thrown out of the equation and keep the capacity at 50?
Mr. Grambush answered they are happy with the total of 38 adults.
_._ Commissioner Rossbach asked staff in the lighting portion of the report, it talks about a wall pack
light that is proposed for security above the dumpster enclosure. A wall pack to him means that
you have a light that is mounted on the wall and shines out from the wall. He asked if the normal
lighting concerns reviewed here, or isn't this an issue for this particular site?
Ms. Finwall said she has been told that the wall pack will be located on the west side of the
building and will be for security reasons only. The city's lighting ordinance only pertains to glare
and photometric requirements to residential properties. The shopping center is to the west, so
the Fighting code would not apply. In addition, the city's community design review board will
review this for design conditions.
Ms. Finwall also wanted to clarify that in the discussion of the original conditional use permit 11
years ago, it was indicated . that the Salvation Army would have 38 adults. A limit, however, was
never placed as a condition on the conditional use permit. Therefore, staff did not propose to
place the 38 count as a condition on this conditional use permit either.
Commissioner Rossbach said thank you.
Commissioner Pearson moved to approve the resolution on pages 13 and 14 approving a
conditional use permit to expand Salvation Army's adult day care center at 2080 Woodlynn
Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following
conditions:
a. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
b. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
Commissioner Rossbach seconded the motion. Ayes — All
The motion is passed.
Chairperson Fischer asked if this goes to the city council meeting on October 8, 2001 ?
Ms. Finwall stated that is correct and it also goes to the community design review board meeting
on September 25, 2001.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
a. Salvation Army Lakewood Temple Addition
2080 Woodlynn Avenue
Secretary Ekstrand stated Salvation Army is proposing to expand their building at 2080
Woodlynn Avenue to improve their adult day care center services. The addition
proposed is 3,457 square feet and will house an activity room, beauty shop, laundry
facility, office, and storm shelter.
The community design review board will be considering the design elements, site layout
and landscaping issues. On September 17, 2001, the planning commission considered
the conditional use permit for this expansion.
The exterior of the proposed addition will match the existing building. There is more
parking than the code requires, there are 86 existing parking spaces and the total
requirement is 57 parking spaces.
The applicant will be relocating the d enclosure that is presently in the location
of the proposed addition. Staff is recommending that 8 birch trees displaced by the
proposed addition be relocated to the west and south of this addition. Mr. Ekstrand also
mentioned in the staff report it states 6 birch trees will be displaced and that should
actually read 8 birch trees.
Board Member Olson asked if the storm shelter is going to be a single elevation addition
on a slab, or is this a foundation basement underneath it?
Secretary Ekstrand said this project is intended to meet ADA standards and staff
recently experienced that with the Beaver Lake Estates mobile home park that just
added an above grade storm shelter.
Chairperson Ledvina asked the applicant to come forward.
Mr. Ken Nordby the architect from NAI Architects for the Salvation Army addition came
forward.
Mr. Nordby said the shelter for the day care facility is at the same level. Most of these
people are incapacitated and or in wheel chairs. If there is inclement weather they will
be able to go right into the storm shelter.
Board Member Olson asked if the walls would be reinforced?
Mr. Nordby said the walls would be reinforced. In fact NAI Architects also did the storm
shelter at the Beaver Lake Estates mobile home park shelter. It has a concrete
reinforced roof and a separate wall next to the existing building that is also reinforced. It
meets the full FEMA requirements for a storm shelter.
Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Nordby if he had any comments or questions regarding
the staff report?
Mr. Nordby said not at all. The restrooms that you see in the plans supercede any of
the ADA facilities. Remember, most of the clients are unable to use the facilities by
themselves. Therefore, the bathrooms are a little bit larger than what is required.
Board Member Shankar asked Mr. Nordby if a restroom with a dimension of 4 feet and
11 %2 inches meets ADA requirements?
Mr. Nordby said that would be an error on the plans, all the restrooms are at 5 feet or
greater.
Board Member Olson asked about the birch trees. She said they don't transplant very
well. She asked if there was an alternate plans in case they don't make it?
Mr. Nordby said they would like to try to replace the birch trees because they have
about 8 -to -10 years of growth already. They may have suffered a little through the
drought but the soil conditions are good and they are hopeful the trees will make it.
Chairperson Ledvina said from his view it seems to be a straight forward proposal and
he doesn't have any further questions or problems with the Salvation Army proposal.
.Board Member Shankar made a motion that the community design review board
approve the plans (date stamped August 24, 2001), for construction of an addition for
the Salvation Army Lakewood Temple located at 2080 Woodlynn Avenue. The owner
shall do the following:
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
b. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
(1) Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans.
C. Complete the following before occupying the building:
(1) Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
(2) Relocate the eight birch trees, which were displaced because of the
addition. The trees should be planted on the west and south side of the
addition.
d. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
(1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
� (2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June
1 if the building is occupied i the fall or winter, or within six weeks of
occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
(3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any
unfinished work.
e. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
Board Member Jorgenson seconded the motion. Ayes — All
The motion is passed.
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
City Manager
Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit
Sinclair Oil Corporation
2158 Rice Street
October 1, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Action by Counca
F
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Rejected
Sinclair is proposing to remove their existing Overhead fuel Canopy and fuel islands at 2158 Rice
Street and construct a new, larger canopy and fuel islands in the same location. The canopy
will cover 2,700 square feet and replace an existing 1,850- square -foot canopy. The six existing
fuel pumps will be replaced with four new pumps. These fuel pumps will have two vehicle
fueling stations each, for a total of eight, and will allow for payment at the pump.
Requests
The applicant is requesting that the city approve the following:
1. A conditional use permit to operate a motor fuel station within the business commercial,
BC, zoning district.
2. A conditional use permit to reconstruct a fuel canopy with an existing nonconforming
setback.
3. Design review.
DISCUSSION
Existing Business
Sinclair fuel station was constructed in 1966. The building is 1,196 square feet and houses a
small convenience store with a cashier counter. No automotive service or repair is done or
proposed from the site.
Sinclair was constructed before the city's requirement that a conditional use permit be obtained
for motor fuel stations within business commercial zoning districts: Because of the expansion of
their facility, a conditional use permit for the motor fuel station is required.
Canopy Design
Overhead canopies within a motor fuel station are required to be set back at least 15 feet from
the street right -of -way. Sinclair's existing canopy is set back three and one -half feet from the
Rice Street right -of -way. Because of limited space between the existing building and the street,
the new Canopy is proposed to be set back five and one -half feet from the right -of -way, which is
nine and one - half feet Closer than code allows. The city council may allow the replacement of
one nonconforming structure with another, as is the case here, if determined to be of the same
or more restrictive nature as the original nonconforming structure. Therefore, a second
conditional use permit is required for the expansion of the nonconforming canopy.
The existing canopy is 37 feet wide by 51 feet deep, and is approximately 14 feet high. The
new canopy will be 54 feet wide by 50 feet deep, and will be 19 feet high. The new canopy will
be two feet higher than the building. Four round steel columns will support the canopy. The
columns will be painted white to match the underside of the canopy.
The canopy fascia will extend to the canopy deck, exposing the underside of the canopy and
recessed lights. The fascia itself will be nonilluminated, but signage . proposed for the canopy
._ will be. illuminated. This proposal' does not include signage, which will require a separate sign
permit and must comply with the city's sign ordinance.
The canopy deck will house 16 recessed lights that are 320 watts each. The lighting is a
particular concern due to the fact that there are residential properties to the west of Sinclair's
fuel station, across the street in Roseville. The city's lighting ordinance states that canopy
lighting must not produce glare to adjacent residential properties, must not exceed 0.4 -foot
candles at the property line adjacent residential property, must be flush- mount type fixtures, and
must not drop beneath the bottom of the canopy. To verify this, a photometric lighting plan must
be. approved by the city prior to issuance of a building permit.
Hours of Operation
The city code states that no motor fuel stations within 350 feet of a residential lot line shall be
operated between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. Sinclair's existing and proposed hours of
operation are from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. With the new style of fuel pumps that allow payment at the
pump, many fuel stations have been allowing 24 -hour, pay -at- the -pump fueling. Because
Sinclair is adjacent residential properties to the west in Roseville, a condition should be placed
on Sinclair's conditional use permit that the fuel station, including pay -at- the -pump fueling, is not
allowed from the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.
Driveway Access
There are three existing driveway accesses into the Sinclair fuel station. Two of the driveways
are on Rice Street and one of the driveways is on County Road B. City code specifies that
driveways must be set back at least 30 feet from intersecting right -of -ways. Sinclair's northerly
driveway on Rice Street is 18 feet from the intersecting right -of -ways. Dan Solar of Ramsey
County Public Works reviewed Sinclair's proposal and states that the northern access on Rice
Street is located very close to the signalized intersection and causes operational problems
during peak hours. For this reason, Mr. Solar and Chuck Ahl, city engineer, agree the northern-
most access on Rice Street should be closed. Larry Feldsien, Sinclair representative, states
that access in and out of the fuel station can be maintained with two driveways and have agreed
to close the most northerly driveway. Y
The driveway on County Road B is 22 feet from the intersecting right -of -ways. At the
September 17, 2001, planning commission meeting, Commissioner Rossbach questioned why
staff and the county engineer did not require that the County Road B driveway be relocated
eight feet to the east to meet the required 30 -foot setback. On review with the county engineer,
it was determined that relocation of the driveway further to the east may hinder the flow of traffic
into the site as the cars would now be directed toward the building rather than the fuel islands.
Sinclair 2 October 1, 2001
In addition, since all of the expansion and remodeling is being conducted along Rice Street,
staff felt that requiring the removal of one of the Rice Street driveways seemed warranted.
Parking
City code requires a motor fuel station to have at least four parking stalls, plus One stall per fuel
pump. The parking stalls in front of the fuel pumps count toward the overall parking
requirement. Therefore, in addition to the eight parking areas in front of each fuel station,
Sinclair is also required to have four parking stalls.
There is ample room on the site for four parking stalls, but currently the parking stalls are not
striped on the pavement. With the expansion of the station, at least four parking stalls should
be striped on the pavement, to include at least one handicap- accessible parking stall. .
Pavement Setback
City code requires that paved areas be set back 15 feet from street right -of -ways. Sinclair's
existing pavement has no setback along County Road B and only a three -foot setback along
Rice Street. Widening the green space in these areas is not possible because the canopy will
come within five and one -half feet of the Rice Street right -of -way and adequate room for
driveway access and parking stalls must be maintained on the north side of the building,
adjacent County Road B. Therefore, the pavement setbacks are proposed to remain the same
as existing.
Landscaping
The existing landscaping is well maintained, but sparse. Because the canopy comes within 5 Y2
feet of the Rice Street right -of -way, additional landscaping along the front of the property should
be installed to help soften and mitigate the negative impacts of the structure. Other areas of
additional landscaping should include perennial plants and shrubs around the base of the two
freestanding signs and on the southwest corner of the lot (location of Dino the Dinosaur).
Maintenance
The site is clean and well maintained for the most part. However, three areas of concern should
be addressed. First, there is a tall freestanding sign located on the northeast corner of the site.
The paint on the pole of this sign is chipped and in need of repainting. Second, the trash
enclosure does not have a closable gate and the dumpster is visible. Third, the mechanical
equipment located in the back of the building is visible from the street. The repair and
maintenance of these items should be complete prior to the building department's final
inspection of the canopy.
CONCLUSION
Due to the building's existing setback to Rice Street of 64 feet, and the need for traffic access to
and from the fuel pumps, the new canopy could not be set back further than the proposed five
and one -half feet from the right -of -way. As stated above, the city council may approve the
replacement of one nonconforming structure for another if it is deemed that the new structure
will be the same or more restrictive in nature. Staff feels that this is the case, due to the fact
that the new canopy will be set back an additional two feet from the Rice Street right -of -way.
Also, the additional landscaping and improvements will enhance the site.
Sinclair 3 October 1, 2001
COMMITTEE ACTIONS
On September 17, 2001, the planning commission unanimously recommended approval of
Sinclair fuel station's request for two conditional use permits including Operating a motor fuel
station within the Business Commercial Zoning District and reconstructing a fuel Canopy with an
existing nonconforming setback.
On September 25, 2001, the community design review board unanimously recommended
approval of plans date stamped August 24, 2001.
_ RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt the resolution on pages 16 and 17 approving a conditional use permit to operate a
motor fuel station within the business commercial, BC, zoning district and to reconstruct
a canopy with an existing nonconforming setback for the Sinclair fuel station located at
2158 Rice Street. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject
to the following conditions:
a. The fuel station's hours of operation, including pay -at- the -pump fueling, are
limited to 6 a.m. to 11 p.m.
b. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any
contaminated soil, etc.
C. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
d. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of
council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may
extend this deadline for one year.
e. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
2. Approve the plans date - stamped August 21, 2001, for the construction of a new canopy
and fuel islands for the Sinclair fuel station at 2158 Rice Street. The owner shall do the
following:
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
b. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
(1) A revised site plan showing:
(a) Removal of the most - northerly driveway on Rice Street and the
replacement of all required curb and gutter along Rice Street and
parking area.
(b) At least four parking stalls, of which one must be handicap
accessible. The handicap accessible stall must meet the
Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements.
Sinclair 4 October 1, 2001
(2) A landscape plan showing:
(a) A landscaped area in front to include low maintenance perennial
plants and shrubs. In addition to city staff approval, the Ramsey
County Public Works Department must also approve any
landscaping installed within the right -of -way.
(b) Perennial plants and shrubs around the base of the two
freestanding signs and on the southwest corner of the lot (location
of Dino the Dinosaur).
(c) In- ground sprinkler for all landscaped areas. If the installation of a
sprinkler system is not feasible because of existing pavement, the
applicant must submit written agreement to hand water all
landscaping.
(d) All planting beds must be edged and mulched.
(3) Revised canopy elevations showing that the lights beneath the canopy
are flush mount. The lenses of the lights must not drop below the opaque
portions of each lighting fixture.
(4) A photometric plan showing that the site lighting does not exceed 0.4 foot
candles at the west property line.
(5) Plans for a trash enclosure gate that is 100 percent opaque and extends
to the ground. The gate shall be compatible with the existing 6- foot -high
wood fence.
(6) Plans for the screening of the mechanical equipment located on the west
side of the building.
C. Complete the following before occupying the building:
(1) Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
(2) Install stop signs at both exits and a hand icap-parking sign for the
handicap- parking space.
(3) Repaint the sign pole on the freestanding sign located on the northeast
corner of the site.
(4) Install the approved trash enclosure gate.
d. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
(1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
Sinclair 5 October 1 , 2001
(2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1, 2002.
(3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any
unfinished work.
e. This approval does not include the signs. All proposed signs require a separate
sign permit and must comply with the city's sign ordinance.
f. All 'work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
g. The remaining southerly curb cut on Rice Street shall be reviewed with the
applicant and city engineer to reassess the traffic and the accessibility to the site.
The curb cut may be expanded as needed according to engineering and applicant
recommendations.
Sinclair 6 October 1, 2001
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size: 35,826 square feet (0.8 acres)
Existing Land Use: Motor Fuel Station
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North:
West:
South:
East:
PLANNING
Existing Land
Use Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Highway 36 in Little Canada
Single Family Homes in Roseville
Cub Foods Parking Lot (zoned BC)
Cub Foods Store (zoned BC)
Business Commercial (BC)
Business Commercial (BC)
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards.
Refer to the findings in the resolution on pages 16 and 17.
APPLICATION DATE
We received the complete applications and plans for Sinclair's proposal on August 21, 2001.
State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a
proposal. As such, city action is required on this proposal by October 20, 2001.
P:Sec3 /sinclair
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Zoning Map
3. Demolition Plan
4. Site Plan
5. Paving Plan
6. Elevations
7. Lighting Plan
8. Sinclair Oil Corporation Letter Dated August 20, 2001
9. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
10. Plans Date Stamped August 21, 2001 (Separate Attachment)
Sinclair 7 October 1, 2001
Attachment 1
Little Canada
County
N Sinclair Location Map
W
Attachment 2
Little Canada
Sinclair
2158 Rice Street
County Road B
Zoning Districts
N
Business Commercial
.'r „., Sin le Dwelling Residential
Farm
Sinclair Zoning District
9
Attachment 3
UG /
i
I
(
I
GRASS
i
I
i
i
s
LIGHT
\ ASPHALT
EXISTING CANOPY AND ISLANDS
TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN
EXISTING CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED 1
ASPHALT
EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED
V LIGHT
0 �
�- EXISTING ONO
I
BUILDING
,
I
'
1Z o
I I Ne 2 SEE 2-
r" ii ii
b
4
VE EXISTING 11 I I
VAPOR FIB RECOVERY STAGE h 11 1 1 1 1
�, � VAP RECOVERY 11 1 Jil
PIPING FROM DIS- II 11 I I
PENSERS TO EDGE
I
I EXISTING PROD C
oIOWG TO
1 BE REMOVED \ I
11 t l ( 1
OF CONCRETE 11 1 1
DEMOLITION 1 10N 1 I 1 I L SEE NODE I
1 FROM ISLANDS
( TO LOCATION
I SU NEW TRANS
SEE
\ \ M
\
TION \
TE �\ \
E STAB yI / I I 1 1 1 1
O C
1 PUN SHEET
C t' \
VAPOR RECOWRY'I I 1` +'
LINE TO REMAIN I I 1 _
1 1
ASPHALT
1 1
C
EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN
EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED
ASPHALT
EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED
V LIGHT
0 �
�- EXISTING ONO
�— EXISTING FLAG POLE
DEMOLITION PLAN
10 N
ASPHALT
Attachment 4
COUNTY ROAD "B"
SITE PLAN
4
N
EXISTING R -1s0 J PROPE LINE
PRICE
— --
-- — — --
GRASS
tIGHT
T -176
TRAPEZOID
I
ISLAND LAYOUT
' SEE W /C -3
ASPHALT
EXISTING SIDEWALX
2S'
PIPE GUARD
SEE K /C -3
tVEW W NW CANOPY
r
SEE SHEET CO-1
r j
GRASS
`
1
(
PRODUCT LINES
S EE A/W —1
BUILDING
Lli
I _
R
e°r t
CANOPY COLUMN
SEE H /C -3
26
U GRASS
NEW TOKHEIM `MPD
3- PRODUCT, 2 -HOSE ! i
�.
�
r
J II
Ti iT
TRAM
`SEE tK-
j
Oy P AIR
U
J XISTIN
I
EXACT LOCATI
TO 8E nELD
ON
STAGE u VAPOR t 1 UND
RECOVERY PIPING 11 I
DETERMIN
I
EXISTING.
S TORAGti
TO TIE INTO EXISTING I I I I
PIPING AT THIS POINT 11 I I TANK I I
t ! I O I I 10
1 EN
I FLEXIOLE PIP
1 CARRIER P
1
RO -FLEX
C INSIDE
I
ASPHALT
I I
I 1
1 ° 1
LIGHT
I
ASPHALT
GRASS
EXISTING OINO
"— EXISTING FLAG POLE
PROPERTY LINE
SITE PLAN
4
N
PAVEMENT KEY
/
6' CONCRETE ISLAND PAD
REINFORCED w /FIBERNESH
SEE B/C -3
EXPANSION JOINT 'Ed
1 UNDERGROUND 1
SEE L/C -3
>
CONTROL JOINT 'SC
SEE 0 /C -3
EXPANSION JOINT 'I,r
SEE F /C -3
.... ...
ASPHALT /CONCRETE JOINT 'AC"
SEE A/C -3
oA
LIGHT
I
r ASPH OVERLAY
AC AC
EJ
SP
Ei
SC
ASPHALT
BUILDING
A .
s�
Attachment 5
GRASS
EJ
1 II it I
0;; 0;; 0
A1R
L
�
j E XISTIN j i
>
1 UNDERGROUND 1
>
„
1 1 STQRA I
I e TANK I 1 ;
LICHT
- jo
1 i
EXISTING ASPHALT TO 9E
REMOVED AND PATCHED
1 1
1 I
PRIOR TO OVERLAY )
(�
f
ASPHALT ,
EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN
Y ASPHALT OVERLAY J
f
•q
LIGHT I
� G �S
O.p
y �O�F
PAVING PLAN
12
N
Attachment 6
>7
b
e
iN GRADE
ELEVATIONS
13
4
N
ELEV ATIQN
NOTE:
CANOPY SUPPLIED AND
INSTALLED BY OTHERS
CANOPY ELE VATION A
CP -1
ELEVATION
CANOPY ELE VATION B
P -1
Attachment 7
4- ROWS. 4- EACH _
LS1 SCOTTSME
320 WATT CANOPY LIGHTS
so'
12' 26' 12
SINCLAIR
SINCLAIR
NOTE:
SINCLAIR SIGNAGE To BE BACK LIT
WITH FLUORESCENT TUBES
RED PUSH -THRU.
BACK -LIT LETTERS
J
r
J
SINCLAIR 51GN
SINCLAIR SIGN DET C
P
LIGHTING PLAN
14
4
N
Attachment 8
SIRCIffIr
august 20, 2001
City of Maplewood
City Hall
1830 County Road `B" East
Maplewood, MN. 55109
RE: Conditional Use Permit
2158 Rice Street
Maplewood, MN
Sinclair Oil Corporation is proposing to remove the existing can and exist
g Py g
dispensers and construct a new canopy with new dispensers at the existing Sinclair
location at 215.8 North Rice Street, Maplewood, MN. The new canopy will be re ctangular
. py angular
vn shape, supported on four columns, ' and cover four new dispensers. The dispensers wil
. " �P p 1
have credit card readers allowing Payment at the Pu The new dispensers will
�P " p be
placed along the identical alignment of the existing slands. The dispensers will be
g sp placed
at a greater spacing which will require a larger canopy. However, it will allow us to
provide more comfortable and safer service to our customers.
We are requesting a Conditional Use Permit to continue to operate the
convenience store with gas service as we have operated for the past many years. To our
knowledge the property is zoned for this use.
The proposed project does not change any of the dimensions of the aved areas s or
the dimensions of the store. The character of the site will remain unchanged,
preserving
the natural features that now exist. It is our opinion that the new canopy nd '
py dispensers
will not change the neighborhood with respect to lanned character, p P , p p rty values, etc.
This project will not require any additional public services of facilities and will
not change the existing environment.
We thank you for your review of our site and request approval of a conditional
q pp
use permit. If there are any questions, please call me at 952 73 6 11008
Sincerely,
100 On
Larry Feldsien
Engineer
SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION
15
6602 PORTLAND AVENUE SOUTH • RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA 55423
612/869 -2436
ATTACHMENT" 9
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Sinclair Oil Corporation applied for conditional use permits to include the
operation of a motor fuel station within the BC, Business Commercial zoning district, and to
reconstruct a canopy with an existing nonconforming setback;
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2158 Rice Street. The legal
description is: -
The North One Hundred Sixty feet (160') of Tract "A," Registered Land Survey Number 10
on file in the office of the Registrar of Titles within .,-and for said County, and the South One-
Half of County Road B extended and the East One -Half of Rice Street extended, adjoining
the above described portion of Tract "A," Registered Land Survey Number 10, on file in the
office of the Registrar of Titles.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On October 8, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above - described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit
because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution,, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
16
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The fuel station's hours of operation, including pay -at -the -pump fueling, is limited to 6 a.m.
to 11 P.M.
2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any contaminated soil, etc.
3. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
4. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council approval
or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
5. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on
2001.
17
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2001
a. Sinclair Station Remodeling
(2158 Rice Street)
Sinclair Oil Corporation is proposing to remove their existing overhead fuel canopy and fuel
islands at their station at 2158 Rice Street, this facility is located at the corner of Rice Street and
County Road B. The Sinclair fuel station was constructed in 1966 prior to the city's requirement
that conditional use permits need to be obtained for motor fuel stations within business
commercial zoning districts. Because of the expansion of their facility, a conditional use permit
for the motor fuel station is now required.
The overhead canopies within the motor fuel stations are required to be setback at least 15 feet
from the right -of -way. Sinclair's existing canopy is located 3% feet from the Rice Street right -of-
way. The existing canopy is old and is in need of repair. Sinclair Oil Corporation states that
because of - limited space between the existing building and the right -of -way, the proposed
replacement canopy cannot meet the required 15- foot- setback either and is proposed with a 5Y2-
foot- setback. For this reason, a second conditional use permit is required for the expansion of
this nonconforming canopy. The existing canopy is 37- feet -wide by 51- feet -deep, is
approximately 14- feet - high, and covers 1,850- square -feet. The new canopy will be 54- feet -wide
by 50- feet- deep, 19- feet -high and this canopy will be 2 feet higher than the building and will cover
2,700- square -feet in area.
The six existing fuel pumps will be replaced with four new fuel pumps. The new fuel pumps will
allow for payment at the pump. To the west of the fuel station across Rice Street, in Roseville,
are residential homes. The city code states that no motor fuel stations within 350 feet of a
residential lot line shall be operated between the hours of 1 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. With the new
type of fuel pumps that allow payment at the pump, many fuel stations have implemented 24 -hour
fuel pumping with pay -at- the -pump. For this reason, a condition should be placed on Sinclair's
conditional use permit that the fuel station including pay -at- the -pump fueling is not allowed
between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.
There are three existing driveway accesses into the Sinclair station. Two of the driveways are on
Rice Street and one is on County Road B. City code specifies that the driveways must be
setback at least 30 feet from the intersecting right -of -ways. Sinclair's northerly driveway on Rice
Street is only 18 feet from the intersecting right -of -ways. Dan Solar of the Ramsey County Public
Works Department has reviewed Sinclair's proposal and states that the northern access on Rice
Street is located very close to the signaled intersection and causes operational problems during
peak hours. For this reason, Dan Solar as well as the city's engineer, Chuck Ahl, agree that the
northern most access on Rice Street should be closed. Ms. Finwall has discussed this with the
Sinclair representative and they agree to that condition. However, to accommodate incoming and
outgoing traffic, the southerly driveway should be increased in width from 32 feet to 36 feet. The
.added 4 feet will ensure an entrance lane, a left -turn exit - lane, and a right exit. This condition
was not originally stated in the staff report but Ms. Finwall would like to present this to the
planning commission for inclusion.
The parking requirements for a motor fuel station are at least four parking stalls plus one parking
stall per fuel pump. On the site there is ample room for the four parking stalls required by code,
but currently the parking stalls are not striped on the pavement. With the expansion of the
station, at least four parking stalls should be striped on the pavement to include at least one
handicap accessible parking stall.
The site generally is clean and well maintained, however, three areas of concern should be
addressed. There is a tall free - standing sign located on the northeast corner of the site, the paint
on the pole of this sign is chipped and in need of repainting. There is also an existing trash
enclosure that does not have a closable gate, which leaves the dumpster visible. The mechanical
equipment located in the back of the building is unsightly and is visible from the street. These
items are included as conditions to Sinclair's design review request and will be reviewed by the
_community design review board on September 25, 2001.
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit for the motor fuel station within the
BC . zoning district as well as the conditional use permit to expand the nonconforming canopy
subject to the conditions as outlined in the staff report.
Chairperson Fischer asked staff if they are requesting that commission members add a condition
under the adoption of the resolution to include the width of the southerly driveway from 32 feet to
36 feet?
Ms. Finwall stated that she brought that up for the commission members to review. and that would
be a condition for the community design review board to consider.
Mr. Roberts said that looking at the conditions that are currently in the report, it looks like item 2.
b. 1 talks about a revised site plan. That would be the place to discuss the condition about the
driveway change and it will be an item for the community design review board.
Commissioner Rossbach was curious why the engineers felt that the northerly driveway on Rice
Street would be worth closing and the driveway on County Road B was not an issue? It seems to
be just as close to the intersection. When he was at the Sinclair station he could not exit out of
the driveway onto County Road B because vehicles were stopped at the stoplight and the
driveway was blocked when he wanted to go left. He was wondering if there should be some
discussion about either moving that driveway and or limiting it to right turns only?
Ms. Finwall thanked commissioner Rossbach for his thoughts and comments. She would assume
that the county, as well as the city engineer, proposed closing the northerly access on Rice Street
because there are two accesses on Rice Street, as well as the fact that Rice Street is a busier
street. However, staff could take a look at requiring the driveway be relocated further to the east
to comply with the 30- foot - setback required for driveways adjacent intersecting roads.
Mr. Roberts said that in addition to what Ms. Finwall has stated, most of the demolition and
construction work is g oing to happen near Rice Street along the front of the store. There is not a
proposed site change on the County Road B side. So, in fairness to the applicant, staff was not
looking at making that change.
Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to come forward.
Larry Feldsien, the owner of Sinclair oil Corporation introduced himself. He commented that he
agreed with the staff with respect to the driveway and the difficulty getting out. He added that if
they, move the driveway on County Road B further to the. east, it would interfere with the flow of
traffic through the site. Yes he agrees that a person could have a difficult time getting out onto
County Road B, but the flow of traffic entering the site would have to make a series of sharp
turning maneuvers to get over to the fuel pumps.
Commissioner Rossbach said he had a problem getting out of the Sinclair station at 11:30 a.m.
He would agree that it would make getting to the pumps more cumbersome, but the site vehicles
are traveling at about 5 m.p.h. and the street traffic is traveling at about 45 m.p.h. on County
Road B. His thought was it would be safer to be turning a few more times in the lot then if they
would be turning directly across the intersection off of County Road B into the Sinclair station.
Commissioner Rossbach also stated that if what the staff said is true, that they are trying to limit
what Sinclair Oil Corporation has to do that is fine, then why don't you make it a right turn only
exiting your site?
Mr. Feldsien stated they could make it a right turn only, but he would like to suggest it be made
for certain hours only.
Commissioner Mueller asked Mr. Feldsien, if you started moving the driveway exit farther to the
east, how close would you come to the Cub entrance? It is not shown on the map.
Mr. Feldsien said if he remembered correctly, the lot line is about 220 feet long and the curb cut is
approximately 22 feet from Rice Street so there is a considerable amount of room.
Commissioner Mueller stated that the closer to the east you push the driveways together may
cause people to pull out from Cub and Sinclair at the same time at a close distance. Also, if it is a
right turn only, the people that want to get out onto Highway 36 will probably just pull out onto
County Road B anyway.
Commissioner Rossbach stated he would like to ask the community design review board to look
at the other entrances and exits to the site. He would like it if staff would have the appropriate
people, whether it be the police chief, or the city engineer, review that particular item before it
goes to the community design review board so they have some information to work with.
Commissioner Rossbach would recommend to the city council to adopt the resolution on pages
16 and 17 approving a conditional use permit to operate a motor fuel station within the business
commercial, BC, zoning district, and to reconstruct a canopy with an existing nonconforming
setback for the Sinclair fuel station located at 2158 Rice Street. Approval is based on the findings
required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
a. The fuel station's hours -of- operation, including pay -at- the -pump fueling, is limited to
6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
b. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency regarding fuel tanks, fuel spillage, monitoring wells, any contaminated soil,
etc.
c. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
d. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approved or the .permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
e. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
Commissioner Dierich seconded the motion. Ayes — All
The motion is passed.
Commissioner Rossbach would also recommend to the community design review board to review
the driveway exit going to the north onto County Road B, with the concern that it is located close
to the intersection, and to determine if that driveway should be moved further to the east or
possibly have a right turn only traffic sign installed at that exit.
Chairperson Fischer asked for a second motion to recommend to the community design review
board to look at the driveway on County Road B with respect to its location to the intersection.
Specifically, should it be moved further to the east or have a right turn only sign?
Since there was no second, this motion died.
There was no motion passed.
Ms. Finwall said this goes to the city council on October 8, 2001.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
C. Sinclair Oil Corporation station remodel
2158 Rice Street
Secretary Ekstrand said Sinclair Oil Corporation is proposing to remove their existing
overhead fuel canopy and fuel islands at 2158 Rice Street and construct a new, larger
canopy and fuel islands in the same location. The canopy will cover 2,700 square feet
and replace an existing 1,850- square -foot canopy. The six existing fuel pumps will be
replaced with four new pumps. These fuel pumps will have two vehicle fueling stations
each, for a total of eight, and will allow for payment at the pump.
The planning commission has already reviewed this and considered a conditional use
permit for the business and a conditional use permit for a nonconforming setback.
Currently the existing canopy is set back 3Y2 feet from the Rice Street right -of -way. The
new canopy is proposed to be set back 5 % feet from the right -of -way, which is 9 �/2 feet
closer than code allows.
Staff is recommending that a driveway access be eliminated as was suggested by
Ramsey County and the city engineer. The northerly curb cut along Rice Street should
be closed because it is very close to the intersection. The planning commission also
brought the point up about the County Road B exit being closed or moved. The county
engineer has looked at that and felt moving it may in fact upset the traffic flow within the
site causing vehicles to enter closer to the building instead of being able to utilize the
area for parking. Therefore, staff is not recommending a change to the County Road B
driveway.
Staff is recommending there be four parking stalls striped and one of those four parking
stalls should be handicap accessible. Currently there is room to park north and south of
the building but there are not any parking striped stalls.
Staff is recommending that the applicant landscape the site by doing something similar
to the Super America station on White Bear Avenue and also on Lower Afton Road with
a wrought iron fence and brick or stone pillars for decoration. Also adding some
landscaping along the length to help enhance the site.
Three areas of concern should also be addressed. There is a tall freestanding sign
located on the northeast corner of the site. The paint on the pole of this sign is chipped
and i need of repainting. Also the trash enclosure does not have a closable gate and
the dumpster is visible. And lastly, the mechanical equipment located in the back of the
building is visible from the street. The repair and maintenance of these items should be
complete prior to the building department's final inspection of the canopy.
Board Member Olson watched the planning commission meeting on TV. There was
discussion about the expansion of the south Rice Street driveway to Highway 36. She
asked if the curb cut should be incorporated into the plans that members are looking at?
Secretary Ekstrand answered no that has not been incorporated.
Board Member Olson would like to make that recommendation. She thinks if that curb
cut is eliminated then there needs to be a wider access on the south.
Chairperson Ledvina asked if Board Member Olson is proposing the expansion because
it is too narrow?
Board Member Olson said that is correct, there are cars that will enter from the north on
Rice Street, turning north from Rice Street, and cars turning south onto Rine Street.
There needs to be space for that kind of traffic and accessibility. is important.
Chairperson Ledvina asked staff if the tall pylon sign is a conforming sign?
Secretary Ekstrand said that sign received a variance for height many years ago.
Chairperson Ledvina asked staff how tall the sign is?
Secretary Ekstrand guessed in the 50 -foot range. It was a sign that was put up higher
than the code allowed. Staff caught the violation and then the applicant applied for a
variance. The variance was approved. Even though it is too tall according to code, it is
still legal by virtue of a variance.
Chairperson Ledvina asked staff if the height of the sign was open for discussion with
this remodeling.
Secretary Ekstrand answered no, it is not open for discussion.
Chairperson Ledvina asked the applicant to come forward.
Mr. Larry Feldsien, of the Sinclair Oil Corporation, addressed himself along with his
Retail Supervisor Kevin Kirchberg.
Board Member Olson asked the applicants if they are going to retain the dinosaur?
Mr. Feldsien and Mr. Kirchberg answered yes.
Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. Feldsien what was his response to the requested
widening of the curb cut width on Rice Street?
Mr. Feldsien said he is in favor of making it wider.
Chairperson Ledvina said it is not indicated in dimensions on the staff report.
Mr. Feldsien said as an engineer he does not like to break up cement curbs just to gain
2 feet, it may be worth it for 5 or 6 feet.
Chairperson Ledvina said maybe the curb cut dimension is something that could be
addressed with staff.
Mr. Feldsien said what he heard was around 36 feet and that would be three lanes for a
car turning left, a car turning right, and a car turning in.
Board Member Olson asked if 36 feet was excessive?
Mr. Feldsien answered no. He would want to review it with the city engineer and also
with Ramsey County before doing anything.
Chairperson Ledvina asked about the lighting in the Sinclair brochure. Does the lighting
extend below the canopy?
Mr. Feldsien said the photo of the station is from Golden Colorado. He had this
discussion with Ms. Finwall and in the report it says that Sinclair will be recessing those
lights into the deck of the canopy. The proposed lights are like the ones at Super
America on White Bear Avenue.
Board Member Olson asked if that directs the light down rather than out because it has
a cylinder around the fixture?
Mr. Feldsien said that is correct.
Board Member Olson asked if he understood that Ms. Finwall wanted Sinclair Oil to
have the lights flush mounted?
Mr. Feldsien said yes.
Board Member Olson asked if that's for maintenance purposes?
Mr. Feldsien said it is for lighting and for glare from the side.
Secretary Ekstrand clarified the lighting ordinance states the fixture protrusions are not
a problem. The problem is the lense drops a few inches below the wrap- around can
portion of the fixture. The lighting code states, a totally flush mount lense does not drop
beneath the bottom level of the canopy at all.
Mr. Feldsien said where the lense drops down it actually deflects the light out sideways.
In other locations they have put in a straight flat lense and therefore you don't get this
side reflection from the actual fixture.
Secretary Ekstrand said that would meet the intent of the lighting ordinance.
Chairperson Ledvina commented that the lighting fixtures would look nicer if they were
flush with the canopy. He is not sure if that is possible or not. In his opinion the Texaco
station on McKnight and County Road B has done a very nice job with their lighting. It
is very pleasing to the eye and produces very little glare. It may be worth driving over
there to see what they have done at that station.
Mr. Feldsien said the handout submitted to the community design review board was
really only given out to show the large Sinclair sign and the colors. Everything else is
not intended for this particular site.
Board Member Olson stated that she has been out west and has seen the truck stops or
stations that are open 24 hours and the lighting that drops down like the lights in the
brochures. She feels the lighting is quite pleasing and welcoming. She asked if they
are going to be closing at 10:00 p.m.?
Mr. Kirchberg, the retail supervisor answered, currently they are not open all night but
as the competition is open we would like to keep that option open. But we are open
until 10:00 and no later than 11:00 p.m.
Board Member Olson asked if they intended to maintain those hours?
Mr. Kirchberg said they would like to keep the option open but currently they are going
to stay with the hours open until 10:00 or 11:00 p.m.
Chairperson Ledvina pointed out that this is a conditional use permit based on their
proximity to a residential dwelling so that is the reason for the limited hours of operation.
Mr. Feldsien said they are having a problem with the wrought iron fence proposal. They
don't see the need for it and they have some preliminary inquiries about the fencing. It
can be very expensive especially with the stone columns. September 25, 2001, Mr.
Feldsien called Ramsey County and he asked if he could put a fence on their right -of-
way? A gentleman named Joe Paroutka said no fence, no trees, and no bushes on the
right -of -way. So from the property line and the pavement that leaves about 3 feet of
space. If a fence was put that close to a driving area it will get driven into and knocked
over as it does at their other station in Shoreview. They feel it is going to be a
maintenance problem and depending how it is routed around their sign they will have to
crawl over the sign to change the prices. The fence has become a thorn in their side
and they are not really in -sync with staff's proposal.
Board Member Olson doesn't see where the fence would be on the plans. Could
someone clarify that for us?
Secretary Ekstrand said staff was considering the fence to wrap around to the curb cut
on County Road B.
Board Member Shankar asked staff what the purpose of the fence was?
Secretary Ekstrand said it was for decoration. Secretary Ekstrand displayed the photo
._ of Super America's fence addition with the wrought iron fence and stone columns to
give members an idea of what staff had in mind to add some decorative enhancements.
It is feasible to just continue the landscaping along that area.
Mr. Feldsien said in lieu of the fence they could do some extra landscaping in the front
of the lot.
Mr. Kirchberg added that the distance from the right -of -way to the curbing is probably
V /2 -to -2 feet wide. That probably leaves a foot or so left and a car would be opening
their door into the pillar columns. It would also represent some difficulty in snow
removal as well.
Board Member Olson said that Mr. Feldsien reported that Ramsey County insisted there
be no vegetation or landscaping installed in their right -of -way.
Chairperson Ledvina said he thought ground cover and landscaping would be
acceptable in that area.
Mr. Kirchberg said they support the landscaping idea to improve the appearance of that
area.
Board Member Olson said she personally doesn't see the proposed fence in this
location; it doesn't look very friendly or accessible to her, and would agree with Mr.
Feldsien that it is going to be more of a hazard. The fence could be hit by the snowplow
as well.
Mr. Kirchberg spoke with Super America about the aspect of winter on their fence with
regards to snowplows and they responded they didn't know yet, because they haven't
had to go through winter with this fence. They are concerned about what condition it
will end up in.
Chairperson Ledvina said he likes the idea of a fence but can certainly understand the
applicant's points -of -view in this instance. The extra landscaping may be a more
practical solution to dressing up the area rather than the fence.
Board Member Olson said she sees the landscaping as a very preferable alternative to
the fencing.
Board Member Shankar made a motion to approve the plans (dated August 21, 2001)
for the construction of the new canopy and fuel islands for the Sinclair fuel station at
2158 Rice Street. The owner shall do the following:
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
b. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
(1) A revised site plan showing:
(a) Removal of the most - northerly driveway on Rice Street. The
applicant shall reconstruct the curbing to standards of Ramsey
County.
{b) At least four parking stalls, of which one must be handicap
accessible. The handicap accessible stall must meet the
,Americans with .Disability Act (ADA) requirements and is
subject to the staff approval.
(2) A landscape plan showing:
(a) A landscaped area in front to include low maintenance
perennial plants and shrubs. In addition to city staff approval,
The Ramsey County Public works Department must also
approve any landscaping installed within the right -of -way.
(b) The landscape area to the west to include low maintenance
perennial plants and shrubs. In addition to city staff approval,
the Ramsey County Public Works Department must also
approve any landscaping installed with the right -of -way.
(c) Perennial plants and shrubs around the base of the two
freestanding signs and on the southwest corner of the lot
(location of Dino the Dinosaur).
(d) In- ground sprinkler for all landscaped areas. If the installation
of a sprinkler system is not feasible because of existing
pavement, the applicant must submit written agreement to
hand water all landscaping.
(e) All planting beds must be edged and mulched.
(3) Revised canopy elevations showing the lights beneath the canopy are
flush mount. The lenses of the lights must not drop below the opaque
portions of each lighting fixture.
(4) A photometric plan showing that the site lighting does not exceed 0.4-
foot candles at the west property line.
(5) Plans for a trash enclosure gate that is 100 percent opaque and
extends to the ground. The gate shall be compatible with the existing
6- foot -high wood fence.
(6) Plans for the screening of the mechanical equipment located on the
west side of the building.
c. Complete the following before occupying the building:
(1) 1 Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
(2) Install stop signs at both exits and a hand icap-parking sign for the
handicap - parking space.
(3) Repaint the sign pole on the freestanding sign located on the northeast
corner of the site.
(4) Install the approved trash enclosure gate.
d. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy
if:
(1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
(2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1, 2002.
(3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any
unfinished work.
e. This approval does not include the signs. All proposed signs require a separate sign
permit and must comply with the city's sign ordinance.
f. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
g. The remaining southerly curb cut on Rice Street shall be reviewed with the applicant
and the city engineer to reassess the traffic and the accessibility to the site. The curb
cut may be expanded as needed according to engineering and applicant
recommendations.
It was agreed upon to leave the lighting for item 2. b. (3) as it is, despite conversation to
change the wording.
Board Member Olson seconded the motion.. Ayes — All
The motion is passed.
A #
�lloobjltlM1� ,
MEMORANDUM ��
ModOW
TO: Cit Mana •
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT Conditional Use Permit Revision, Conditional Use Permit and Desi
Review
PROJECT Maplewood To
LOCATION: 2873 Hi 61
DATE: October 1, 2001
INTRODUCTION
Pro Description
Steve McDaniels, the owner of Maplewood To is proposin two projects for Maplewood
To The first pro involves puffin three additions onto the existin Maplewood To
buildin at 2873 Hi 61. ( See the maps on pa 12-14. The additions would be 3,040
s feet of showroom space, 1, 144 s feet of service area and 375 s feet for an
emplo loun All of the additions would be one stor tall and would match the existin
buildin (See the site plan on pa 14 and the elevations on pa 18.
The second proposal is to develop a new parkin lot/displa area across the street from the
dealership on the northwest corner of Hi 61 and Beam Avenue. (See the maps on pa
1417 and the applicant's letter on pa 19.)
Re
Mr. McDaniels is re the followin
1 A. conditional use permit (CUP revision to expand a nonconformin use. Maplewood To
is a nonconformin use because the do not meet the standards of the current shoreland
ordinance. The are in the Kohiman Lake shoreland area. The shoreland ordinance allows a
maximum impervious surface of 40% of their site. Impervious surface is the area covered b
the buildin and pavin Maplewood To alread exceeds 40% because the built in
1981 before the cit adopted the shoreland ordinance.
The proposed 375-square-foot addition on the northwest comer of the buildin would
increase the impervious surface area on this site from 69.2% to 69.5% (a 0.3% increase
The cit code allows the cit council to approve a CUP to enlar a nonconformin use. If
the applicant provides additional g reen space on their site to replace the 375 feet that the
addition would cover, then the impervious surface matter would not need cit approval.
2. A conditional use permit for the stora of motor vehicles on a propert in the M-1 (li
manufacturin zonin district. Mr. McDaniels is proposin to build a new vehicle
sales/displa lot for his dealership on the northwest corner of Hi 61 and Beam
Avenue. Section 36- 151 (b)(4) of the cit code re a conditional use permit for the
stora of motor vehicles in this location.
3. Approval of pro plans. This includes the proposed additions to the existin dealership
and the plans for the new sales/displa lot. The proposed additions would match the exterior
materials and design of the existing showroom. (See the plans on pages 14 -18 and the
attached plans.)
BACKGROUND
Maplewood Toyota
On January 18, 1979, the city council approved a plan amendment, special use permit and project
plans for the original Maplewood Toyota building.
On January 9, 1995, the city council approved a CUP and the plans for a 1,404- square -foot addition on
the north side of Maplewood Toyota. (This approval was subject to four conditions.)
On January 22, 1996, the council reviewed the CUP for Maplewood Toyota. The council decided to
only review the permit if a problem arises.
Other Approvals for Impervious- Surface Expansions
On December 14, 1992, the city council granted Maplewood Toyota a CUP to enlarge their parking
lot. This expansion increased the impervious surface from 66% to 68.7 %. The code allowed a
maximum of 40 %.
On October 10, 1994, the council granted Lakeview Lutheran Church a CUP to enlarge their building.
This addition increased the impervious surface from 38% to 40 %. The code allowed a maximum of 30 %.
DISCUSSION - EXISTING DEALERSHIP
Building Additions
The applicant is requesting approval to put three additions onto the existing Maplewood Toyota
building. As 1 noted above, the additions would be 3,040 square feet of showroom space, 1,144
square feet of service write -up area and 375 square feet for an employee lounge. All of the additions
would be one story tall and would match the existing building.
Impervious Surface Area
The proposed staff lounge on the northwest corner of the existing building is the only building addition
that would increase the amount of impervious surface on the site. This addition would require the
removal of a large spruce tree and grass area. This small addition, however, should have little if any
effect on the site and on the storm water leaving the site. If the applicant provides additional green
space on their site to replace the 375 feet that the addition would cover, then this matter would not
need city approval.
Loading and Unloading Vehicles
In the past, vehicle transport drivers have used Beam Avenue for unloading new vehicles. However,
since the completion of the new repair shop north of Beam Avenue, the transports have been
unloading the vehicles in the new parking lot. I am not aware of any complaints since Toyota built their
northerly shop.
K
DISCUSSION - PROPOSED PARKING /DISPLAY AREA
Conditional Use Permit
The intent of the code, which requires a CUP for land uses in the M.1 (light manufacturing) zoning
district when they are closer than 350 feet to a residential district, is to give the city an opportunity to
set conditions of operation and require additional buffering to protect homeowners. In this case, the
nearest residential district near the proposed new vehicle lot is the west part of the project site with
the existing house and detached garage. The nearest residential neighbor's house (2898 Duluth
Street) is about 200 feet from the proposed parking lot.
The proposed plans show a large screening buffer of trees near the west property line of the project
site. The code requires the screening to be at least six feet tall and 80 percent opaque. The proposed
trees, along with the existing trees that will remain along the west property line of the site, would meet
this requirement.
The proposed parking lot will be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Maplewood Toyota has
their main showroom and display lot to the south across Beam Avenue and their new repair and
service facility to the north of the site. The parking /display area should not add much, if any, traffic to
the streets in the area. The proposed facility is for employee parking and will allow Maplewood Toyota
to spread out their sales area and increase the number of vehicles they store on their property. They
are not proposing to add any employees with this project but want to give themselves and their
customers more room. As a land use, the proposed parking lot/display area would have less impact on
the neighborhood than if a new office building or restaurant was constructed on the site.
An advantage of this plan is that the proposed driveway connection to the existing service facility to
the north of the site will allow for better traffic circulation. Maplewood Toyota now has to go east on
Beam Avenue, then north on Highway 61 to Guldens and then make a U -turn south to get to their
service facility. The proposed parking lot and driveway connection will allow Maplewood Toyota to
move vehicles north and south between their facilities without having to go on Highway 61. This
should be safer and also will lessen the number of vehicles that will be on Beam Avenue near
Highway 61.
The . city council should consider methods like hours of operation, screening and light -glare control to
protect these nearby residents from disturbances.
Building Design
The proposed site plan shows the location of a possible future building. The applicant is not sure,
however, if he wants to construct a building on this site. The applicant should note that the code
requires the building be at least 350 feet from the residential zoning district. In addition, any building
design and site plan changes must be approved by the CDRB before the city could issue a building
permit for it.
Site Considerations
The applicant should provide details when they apply for building permit approval including dimensions
for all site - related elements (parking lots, drive aisles, green space, setbacks, buildings).
Landscaping
Staff has several issues with the proposed landscape plan (page 15). They are as follows:
• First, it should be noted that the city code requires the applicant to install an in- ground irrigation
system for all landscape areas. For this site, there should be an irrigation system in the landscape
areas around all sides of the parking lot and for the on -site frontage along Beam Avenue and
Highway 61.
• The proposed NURP pond should have some special attention with the landscaping. Specifically,
the assistant city engineer is recommending that the contractor use a native seed mix with wet
4 _ Forbes for the turf and that the applicant plant trees, shrubs and other landscaping in the pond area
above the 864 contour. These changes will improve the look of the site and should ease and
simplify the maintenance of the pond area more than if it has just turf or grass.
Site Lights
The applicant should provide a lighting plan indicating the light spread and fixture design. The fixtures
the contractor installs should have a design that hides the bulb and lens from view to avoid nuisances.
The code requires that the applicant design and install site lights so they do not shine into any
neighbors' windows or onto a public street. The Fighting standards should not be more than 25 feet tall
as proposed in the new outdoor lighting ordinance.
City Engineer's Review
Chris Cavett, the assistant city engineer, is generally satisfied with the proposed plans. He is
recommending, however, that the applicant pay special attention to the NURP pond area with the type
of turf that they plant and by having them add landscaping to improve the look of the site. (See the
comments noted above.)
Shoreland Ordinance
This property is within the Kohlman Lake shoreland boundary area. The code allows up to 50 percent
impervious - surface coverage, if the applicant provides an on -site method for reducing storm water
flow or provides for the treatment of runoff. The applicant is proposing a NURP pond on the west end
of the site to satisfy this requirement. To ensure that there will be enough land area to meet the 50
percent impervious - surface requirement, the applicant must combine the two properties to form one
parcel for tax and identification purposes.
COMMISSION ACTIONS
On September 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed conditional
use permits for the expansion of Maplewood Toyota.
On September 25, 2001, the community design review board (CDRB) recommended approval of the
revised design plans that the applicant submitted to the board at their meeting for the expansion of
Maplewood Toyota.
4
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 22 -23. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to
expand a nonconforming use and for revisions to Maplewood Toyota at 2873 Highway 61.
Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
_ approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Beam Avenue shall not be used for loading or unloading of vehicles.
B. Adopt the resolution on pages 24 -25. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a
motor vehicle sales and display lot on the northwest corner of Beam Avenue and Highway 61.
Approval is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:.
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The location of the proposed building on this site is not approved. If the applicant wants to
construct this building, it must be at least 350 feet from the residential property line and
the plans must be approved by the city.
This permit is subject to the property owner combining the two parcels for tax and identification
purposes. The applicant shall record the paper work for this combination before the city issues
any permits for construction for this project.
C. Approve the plans (stamped August 22, 2001) for three building additions to Maplewood Toyota.
This approval is based on the findings required by the city code. The approval shall be subject to
the applicant or owner meeting the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Provide a plan for city staff approval for any roof - mounted equipment that may be
added on top of the proposed additions. (code requirement)
b. Provide a lighting plan for city staff approval for any additional exterior security lighting
that may be needed.
c. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a building permit:
5
(1) Final site, parking lot, grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. These
plans shall meet the requirements of the city code and the city engineer. These
shall include:
(a) Showing all drive aisles at 24 feet in width.
(b) Having handicap - parking spaces that meet the requirements of the ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act).
(c) All customer and employee parking areas meeting city code standards.
(d) Showing any additional landscape or turf areas on the site.
3. Complete the following before occupying the additions:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Paint all rooftop mechanical equipment to match the uppermost part of the building.
The owner or contractor shall screen any new roof - mounted equipment that is visible
to residential property. (code requirement)
c. Stripe any new customer and visitor parking spaces at a width of 9 Meet and the
employee vehicle parking spaces at a width of nine feet.
d. Install fire protection and alarm systems as required by the fire marshal.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or
winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or
summer.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
6. This approval does not include signs. The applicant must get any additional signs approved
by city staff.
D. Approve the plans (stamped September 28, 2001) for a motor vehicle sales and display lot on
the northwest corner of Beam Avenue and Highway 61. This approval shall be subject to the
findings required by the code and is subject to the following conditions:
C01
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. The applicant shall get a demolition permit from the city for the house at 2889 Highway 61.
3. The applicant's engineer shall provide the city engineer with the drainage calculations and
design criteria for the proposed NURP pond.
4. Before the city issues a grading permit, the applicant shall:
a. Combine the two parcels for tax and identification purposes. The applicant shall record
the paper work for this combination before the city approves the permits for this
project.
. b. Revise the plans for staff approval as follows:
(1) For the parking lot, show:
(a) Details about the proposed fence and gate including the location, design
and materials. The fire marshal must approve any :gate or system that
restricts access to the site.
(b) All drive aisles at 24 feet in width, a striped pedestrian walkway and all
customer and employee parking areas meeting city code standards. The city
w619 not regulate the width of parking spaces for the vehicle sales lot.
However, the city will require striped spaces for the neat and orderly parking
and storage of vehicles.
c. Submit a photometric - lighting plan that meets the standards of the city lighting code
for staff approval. This plan shall show:
(1) The light spread and fixture design. The lens covering the bulb shall be
concealed or aimed so not to cause a nuisance to drivers or to neighbors.
(2) That the site lights will not exceed 25 feet in height.
d. Make changes to the landscape plan for staff approval including:
(1) Showing an in- ground irrigation system for all landscape areas. This shall include
the landscape areas around all sides of the parking lot and for the boulevards
along Beam Avenue and Highway 61.
(2) Adding several trees, shrubbery and other landscaping in the pond area above
the 864 contour.
(3) Using Mn /DOT 25A or a similar native seed mix with wet Forbes in the NURP
pond area.
(4) Showing that the screening on the west side of the proposed NURP pond will be
at least six feet tall and at least 80 percent opaque.
7
(5) Showing the removal of the area of the existing driveway and curb cut for the
house at 1241 Beam Avenue and the restoration with turf and landscaping.
e. Get a building permit for the proposed retaining wall if any part of the wall is more than
four feet tall.
5. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work.
The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
6. The future proposed building shown in the parking lot is not approved. If the applicant
chooses to construct this building, they must submit the plans to the city for approval.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve
minor changes.
��
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 19 properties within 350 feet of the site. Of the five replies, one was for
the proposal, one was against, one had no objection and two had Comments.
For
1. We are in support of this proposed development. (Bruce Mogren, for Mogren Family, owners of
Countryview Golf Center)
Against
1. See the letter from James Anderson on pages 20 and 21.
Miscellaneous Comments
1. We have no objection to the project. (ABRA Auto Repair)
2. Our greatest concern is the loss of mature trees on the west side of this lot. These trees have
provided us a buffer between the residential area and the highway. Without this buffer, my
property values may decease significantly. I also have concerns about having a parking lot on
this property. It will decrease the esthetic qualities of this area. I personally would rather have a
building on this property. A backyard view of a car lot may also decrease our property values.
Another concern I have about the landscape plan is the introduction of the pond to the 1241
Beam Avenue lot. This will increase the mosquito population of this area, especially our
property. This is a health concern for my toddler as well as other young children in this area. If
these development plans are approved, I would like assurances that the berm of Black Hills
Spruce are planted as indicated and as many mature trees are saved as possible on the west
end of the lot and on 1241 Beam Avenue. Thank you for requesting our input. (Benson - 2898
Duluth Street)
3. Will this help the parking situation? Since the last expansion, we have workers cars parked in
front of our house everyday, except Sundays. Will they have parking for workers on these
properties?
live next to the so- called pond the city made next to Toyota. This pond seeps onto my property
and when Toyota does construction my back yard fills with water. I have had the city here 3
times in 7 years —one time they said they ticketed someone. Help me if you can. I do not want it
worse after construction. (Carol Forth -1220 Beam Avenue)
9
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size (south site): 3.94 acres
Site size (north site): 2.61 acres
Existing land use (south): Maplewood Toyota
Existing land use (north): A single dwelling owned by Maplewood Toyota
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Two houses and Toyota service center
South: KSTP property with radio towers
West: A vacant lot used as a holding pond and houses
East: Highway 61
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing)
Zoning: M -7 (light manufacturing) and F (farm residential)
Ordinance Requirements:
Section 25 -70 of the city code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not
create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
Section 36 -17(e) allows the city council to approve a CUP for the enlargement of a nonconforming
use.
Section 36- 566(c)(1 )(e) requires that properties in the Kohlman Lake shoreland boundary area have
no more than 30% impervious surface area. This may be increased to 40% if the property owner
provides an on -site method to reduce the storm water flow or to treat the runoff for water pollutants.
Maplewood Toyota installed a water- treatment device at the south end of their site when they
originally built.
10
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the city may approve a CUP, based on the nine standards in the
resolution on pages 22 -23.
Application Date
We received the applications for these requests on August 22, 2001. State law requires that the city
take action within 60 days of receiving proposals. As such, city council action is required on these
requests by October 21, 2001.
p: sec4 /toyota01. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Proposed Landscape Plan (dated September 28, 2001)
5. Proposed Utility Plan (dated September 28, 2001)
6. Proposed Grading Plan (dated September 28, 2001)
.7. Proposed Building Elevations
8. Appfiicant's letter dated August 22, 2001
9. Letter from James Anderson dated September 7, 2001
10. Conditional Use Permit Revision Resolution
11. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
12. Plans stamped August 22, 2001 (separate attachment)
13. Plans stamped September 28, 2001 (separate attachment)
11
Attachment 1
VAD NAIS HEIGHTS
i COUMY
Q HIGH CT.
LYDIA
Ba AVE.
cr.
Kohlrnon
Garvois ��� f � \ -.,Lake
Luke
COUNTY
PA- LM TranOrS
CT.. Q cart
SEXTANT
a
a
� o
DR. O Keller O
>-- f'
r;
9
ti �
GI
Markham
rp / 4:� . XOHLMAN IL AVE. NO, /
j i V j t � Z � F
ROAD C
Z
AVE �"ii DEMONT AVE.
CD
AVE. t�
SEXTANT AVE.
UDC �IU�
EW I 0
VW1W [ DR.
S"ERREN AVE
F1sad Lake � AV
L A VE.
q � „ URK Al
_
lAUR1E R0. �� t�UR1E �RO
SAND � Pwir iii AVE. l:J
�0 � Y Co. F
WM E If 'AVE.
AVE
LOCATION MAP
12
ABM 1. SIlmgYNT CT,,
2. COUNTRWwMi C1R.
3, DUWTH CT.
19 _
4
N
Attachment 2
STl . to
33* esmt
4.29 ac
GULDEN'S
O�
b
Und
As (60 0 Al
8,-
(2-7) . 1 9 -
0 a (#
.113 a 2
ot Cr- 38
0 k-r-T)
(14
r - - --
13
22 8.67
8) 12930:45 LAMETT'RY"S-
(.30 IV.
?4
1%.
1 7.88
17 3f 90 �' �6 �9��
19(33) -07 TOYOTA BUILDING I "
Art) DULUT 1 4?.36 -%jr I <
0.02
I Zo
2906
foe-.03 '- a ��" / �`'�"� �'
�� Z� ° 18 „! (4 6) 2911
0 v
XX
13; 1 9 2898
N
e-410
175 .... ...... k-
. ti p : ........... 1 -'
wx e
2889
x
<
-- W.K.W. �O
ri to
r - Cos
• 07 2883 2882
0 51) (so)
-AA-1
CID
BEA M AVENUE
— WLAM -AVIEA- M ES HT G�Pf
P zoo 7--j r Soo 3 460 T.S'd C5 i 32
r 8154 6 5
Aw 19:
1190 10 G H
0 -0 10410 TOYOTA e4- 67A #tire-155 esm,r
51 8C -C I r
v
48C
4 lie
j #
4 '0 2873 SST
(3
go 19
ri 6)
d (to) (1 7) SITE
' ; ►) to I �. l\ j�' • F l � t
t
. IV- 176-8¢
V V2
.103 � 102 � � � -..� � 9
f .� ,� _ 400
(7) w 4 1
P AR r OF
W lit Ono
I
0 z 44 3
0
to I �' ` _
.- 7 ZI
go
,
lie
Total 1B.C.Soc
in S
?4^TldNAL BATIMR SR0A0CAS-rjw_-v
C O• ` —"� 3y —' ""�'� I
B.c�JceSfi..� Cu. � � t33 °�
JIM
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
13
4
OR.
M 0)
(17)
IV
C
0
o 2986'
•
7)
j4n.ot
ia,rq SUM MI T
CT.
G'OD297810
1)3 0
0 0
1 0 ' 5
A 1i
On) (0
Ice)
w
0
0 0
co 2970 aD
4
C*41
1296
04 .00
Wft _ „ N
N
1140.01
.0
N 17
..2954
fx
IV26) COUNTRyV 0
f
09
00 or
/P
STl . to
33* esmt
4.29 ac
GULDEN'S
O�
b
Und
As (60 0 Al
8,-
(2-7) . 1 9 -
0 a (#
.113 a 2
ot Cr- 38
0 k-r-T)
(14
r - - --
13
22 8.67
8) 12930:45 LAMETT'RY"S-
(.30 IV.
?4
1%.
1 7.88
17 3f 90 �' �6 �9��
19(33) -07 TOYOTA BUILDING I "
Art) DULUT 1 4?.36 -%jr I <
0.02
I Zo
2906
foe-.03 '- a ��" / �`'�"� �'
�� Z� ° 18 „! (4 6) 2911
0 v
XX
13; 1 9 2898
N
e-410
175 .... ...... k-
. ti p : ........... 1 -'
wx e
2889
x
<
-- W.K.W. �O
ri to
r - Cos
• 07 2883 2882
0 51) (so)
-AA-1
CID
BEA M AVENUE
— WLAM -AVIEA- M ES HT G�Pf
P zoo 7--j r Soo 3 460 T.S'd C5 i 32
r 8154 6 5
Aw 19:
1190 10 G H
0 -0 10410 TOYOTA e4- 67A #tire-155 esm,r
51 8C -C I r
v
48C
4 lie
j #
4 '0 2873 SST
(3
go 19
ri 6)
d (to) (1 7) SITE
' ; ►) to I �. l\ j�' • F l � t
t
. IV- 176-8¢
V V2
.103 � 102 � � � -..� � 9
f .� ,� _ 400
(7) w 4 1
P AR r OF
W lit Ono
I
0 z 44 3
0
to I �' ` _
.- 7 ZI
go
,
lie
Total 1B.C.Soc
in S
?4^TldNAL BATIMR SR0A0CAS-rjw_-v
C O• ` —"� 3y —' ""�'� I
B.c�JceSfi..� Cu. � � t33 °�
JIM
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
13
4
Attachment 3
e �
EI JIM
fig 9
- I I
S g
[IF
- I
;TM
I�
IE241 rFITITl I I I
Wl
E
6EAM Avg,
e
m
0
i f
a �
J�
4M
SITE PLAN
14
i
N
1
R� I
li
0
La
vi
f
) 6
LC
la
IL
� t6
€3�
fig 9
- I I
S g
[IF
- I
;TM
I�
IE241 rFITITl I I I
Wl
E
6EAM Avg,
e
m
0
i f
a �
J�
4M
SITE PLAN
14
i
N
Attachment 4
'— ��—' -- -- -- -- —
| |
. .
| |
| '
| ^
. .
GEM
c | | | u�zmu /
! � �x����zM'
%RETAfN"4M WALL
VIFLD
IMP
| —
_
`)
69
NORIH
( T OF
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
15 1
______
c | | | u�zmu /
! � �x����zM'
%RETAfN"4M WALL
VIFLD
IMP
| —
_
`)
69
NORIH
( T OF
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
15 1
______
Attac hment 5
r
}
i
� 4
SUVWWOUS SURFACE /
BMAMOUS SURFACE /
! 4 f
/ J
%4EP r MAIM
OF BMW STORM
SEWER PRIOR TO _j
COIISIRUCTION
RIM
i W- MW4e4.05 r /
10 C.r, a I RIPRAP j ; r {
te• �e� ca►tE
NN --s
/
0
r
r
i auaetc ■ri � � / 3 y 7 ►
RI
'le r � } 107' —�� RCP I , / r N
� J
W-4 e ill RN -M13 wj! AQ' l •)
•.. yp• • y,.,. � .w-eei RN 47
so
„/ O1b7WC d S Vli�Wl• SEYiEA .�' —t.,l' ' p 4., SYI -1e• 4r RCP 0 0
sox 1 calm Ir �MWI E)
VERY ELEVATION OF 0TWO IM
UT111M PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION •• car .+. +ia ►��
PISU1ATE WTH 4'Xe• - THICK t•• q ° O 0 301< DOUBLE Co
POL1ST1 E E AM NIAAATM 00►�T O0 � e• . RIM-W.77
E7115TIN0 UN
' ' • .� , "K" .r.w-0iE .►aME -- � trK Ord y
�e.eo - --• •--- •� - - -� -- — •�---- •+•,� - -- - - -- sue- - - +�-¢- - -�- -- -�---- �- - - -� -- - - - -, : e'— x-� •� .�,.,�
si -.re �� v. i.,r._ .cree w.-e .r•.r,: 1 1 1 O
w, ... w i Kam • sl...
own w.e i u a siw w -ra , .,"� w . 4. wus a Am,
rwsrn :sa
w..t�
i BITUMINOUS SURFACE �. BENCHMARK e. x
n x
!:E _..s: a
BEAM AVENUE PERMIT DRAWINGS
WIR TH~r "'S "`''""F""T0N OR "�0� WAS ° � PA � SCHOELL A MADS OWNER/DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME/SHEET TITLE DATE
."M W o1RECr sw�nslow NO 7MAT 1 Am A M LY UcefaW
` E " ° °` `"'°� " `""' OF °" S` "X Of MNN60t � a A EI Mof STEINER DEVELOPMENT, INC.
MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA
00. N0. 41258 IOW TIfATL1TA eOIIIEVAI R: ovievow owl MN 3010 NOWAY 101 S MAPLEWOOD, MN
1» c „ 700F WAYZATA, W UTILITY PLAN
. \EN �All1 I I S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 60172 -067 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS
PROPOSED UTILITY PLAN
16
4
N
Attachm 6
t
l
n
0 20 40 60
l
BITUMINOUS SURFACE -976
WALL CONSTRUCM 1 R1..
ADJUST IN FIELD _
x
a�
i
r
F
3
t N
{
61! i MIA V
i
10 Q •.f• ROMr� .VA X n w W
M• f[.r1 y....ie.M 'Ji •G
BEAM AVENUE M PIEN CURSM r -WMN�
EXIS11N0 crtAOFS keo CURB TYPE x C / o/
PERMIT DRAWINGS
a00Ea T T A Wes PNEPARE'p
"WON N SCHOELL & MADSON, tIN OWNER DEVELOPER PROJECT NAME SHEET TITLE
tAft Of THE �STATE M °`'""�° / SO : M OWNER/DEVELOPER DEVELOPMENT, INC. MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA
10510 10MMX =&&ARD. SU MAPLEWOOD, MN
4 ° core 3530 8810 1/ONWAY 101 8
W- 1 M f� WAYZATA, M GRADING, DRAINAGE A EROSION DATE 'Ulm , CONTROL PLAN
:BEN z . �n01 n , Clivitil S.M.I. PROJECT N0. 60172 --067 SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS
PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
17
t
Attachment 7
To "= III H
+aw ooM:n�ucnoM ooMMrMUR�M - -
�.�WEST ELEVATION
FWA ."wau To-
MAM M
maxim NAM
� r� a is
Y.1
0
MAP LEWOO D ® TOYOTA
MQ ooxmwxm
MA PUM 10
on"= am
w Auft "V=
To VAM W I
PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS
(EXISTING TOYOTA BUILDING)
18
4
N
� �IRIfCt101t MR OQ�I�IiC}MIM
L_
08/22/01 .13:32 FAX 9524737058 STEINER DEVELOPMENT INC.
r� -•
Ste 11 IIU
•:. �. LL�1`Ii.:L"rr�a.r�iCiiL�N.a.J
De velopmei t Inc.
3,610 County Road 101
Wayzata, MN 55391
(952)473-5650 Fax (952)473-7011
August 22, 2001
Tom Ekstrand
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood MN 55109
Re: Maplewood Toyota Conditional Use Permit
Dear Tom:
Attachment 8
0002/002
RECEIVED
AUG 2 2 2001
In conjunction with the Site Plan review process we are requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the _'Maplewood Toyota
Expansion Project.
The site is zoned M -1 Light Industrial, but due to residential within 350 feet a Conditional Use Permit is required. The
surrounding residential area is separated to the west by wet lands south of Beane Ave and a 40,255 SF buffer lot north of
Beam Ave. The buffer lot remains residential and is heavily landscaped in conjunction with being used as a NERP
pond.
The proposed expansion North of Beam Ave. is to be used as an auto storage area containing 55,576 SF of hard surface
area which will store approximately 163 cars and have the ability to add a maximum 4,800 SF future office /support
Building.
It was determined with staff that the proposed buildiuig does meet the City's comprehensive plan, it will not change the
character of the surrounding area and the project should improve property values.
Maplewood Toyota is expanding their business by creating vehicle storage north of Beam Ave. which frees up enough
space for 6,059 SF of expansion to the existing Building. The expansion is 3,040 SF of Sales Area 1,144 SF of Service
Area, 375 SF of Employee Lounge and approximately 1,500 SF of Mezzanine Storage Area. These uses are the same
that is occupying the existing site and will not be hazardous, a nuisance, create excessive pollution or be unsightly.
Site access is to be limited to the two existing curb cuts on the south side of Beam Ave. and relocation of the two
existing curb cuts on the north side of Beam Ave. to align with the east access drive and allow for the west buffer lot.
The expansion should provide no or minimal traffic increase on local streets. The site plan indicates substantial new
landscaping on the western buffer lot, which is also graded to preserve existing mature trees.
The proposed project efficiently utilizes existing city services and does not create any additional public costs.
We appreciate your cooperation on this matter.
Sincerely,
STEINER I3 oP , INC.
ederick Ric ter
Vice President
19
Attachment 9"
September 7, 2001
Community Development Department
City of Maplewood
1830 E County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Attn: Kenneth Roberts
-- Dear Mr. Roberts,
RE: Maplewood Toyota Additions
I have lived in Maplewood my entire life and purchased my home at 2890
Duluth Street about four years ago. I enjoy living in Maplewood and the
neighborhood I'm currently in.
I have no problem with Maplewood Toyota as they currently exist. They
were at that location before our housing development was built. I do have a
problem with the current plans to expand and do away with the buffer zone
that is between our housing development and highway 61. The trees that are
currently there help with the noise from highway 61 during the. summer
months.
It looks like they plan to do away with the residential driveway located at
1241 Beam Avenue and create access to that residential home through the
newly designed parking lot. This new plan would also create excess from the
dealership through the parking lot to their other buildings off of highway 61.
This would create much more traffic and cars crossing Beam Avenue where
traffic already backs up every day.
This is my home and a place that I have spent a great deal of money and plan
to stay for a long time. Please do not take away the current buffer zone that
exists between my housing development and highway 61. I would also ask
that you do not allow the driveway from the dealership to the other
businesses along highway 61. Myself and others in the neighborhood, feel
that this would create more traffic and congestion to that intersection.
I always thought that house located 1241 Beam was zoned residential and
would always help with that buffer zone. It looks like this current plan to
expand takes away that residential home site by taking away access of the
20
driveway away and creating the only access through the commercial parking
lot.
It is my hope that something can be done to keep the buffer zone and that
residential home located at 1241 Beam Avenue intact.
Thanks for taking the time to read my letter and I will always be available by
phone if you have any questions. I love living in Maplewood and the
separation of business and Highway 61 from our housing development is
very important to us who live in my neighborhood.
Sincerely, '
i
ames R. Anderson
2890 Duluth Street
Maplewood, MN 55109
Home (651) 483 -8954
Work (651) 436 -2790
21
Attachment 10
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Steve McDaniels, of Maplewood Toyota, applied for a conditional use permit to add
onto an automobile showroom.
1. WHEREAS, Section 36- 566(c)(1)(e) of the city code allows a maximum impervious surface area of
40% for this property.
WHEREAS, this permit allows increasing the impervious surface area of the site from 69.2% to
69.5 %, making the impervious surface area on the site 29.5 % Over that allowed by the code.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2873 Highway 61. The legal description is:
Subject to widened STH 61 /1, Lot 101 Gardena Addition to Ramsey County, MN. (PIN 04- 29 -22-
41 -0006)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September '17, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On October 8, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed,, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
22
8. The use. would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city council
approval or the permit shaft end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Beam Avenue shall not be used for loading or unloading.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2001.
23
Attachment 11
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Steve McDaniels, of Maplewood Toyota, applied for a conditional use permit to
construct a new vehicle sales /display lot for his dealership on the northwest corner of Highway 61
and Beam Avenue.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 151(b)(4) of the city code requires a conditional use permit for the storage
of motor vehicles in this location.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2889 Highway 61. The legal description is:
Subj1 ect to road and highway, part westerly of centerline of said highway of South 253 feet of the
east 608.4 feet of the NE 1/4 of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22 (PIN 04- 29 -22 -14 -0003)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September 17, 2001, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On October 8, 2001, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council
also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
24
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction. must be substantially started within one year of city council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The location of the proposed building on this site is not approved. If the applicant wants to
construct this building, it must be at least 350 feet from the residential property line and the
plans must be approved by the city.
This permit is subject to the property owner combining the two parcels for tax and identification
purposes. The applicant shall record the paper work for this combination before the city issues any
permits for construction for this project.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 2001.
25
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2001
a, Maplewood Toyota Expansion
(2873 and 2889 Maplewood Drive)
Mr. Roberts stated that Steve McDaniels, the owner of Maplewood Toyota, is proposing two
projects for Maplewood Toyota. The first project involves putting three additions onto the existing
Maplewood Toyota building at 2873 Highway 61. The additions would be 3,040- square -feet of
showroom space, 1,144- square -feet of service area, and 375- square -feet for an employee
lounge. All of the additions would be one -story -tall and would match the existing building.
The second proposal is to develop a new parking lot/display area across the street from the
dealership on the northwest corner of Highway 61 and Beam Avenue.
Mr. McDaniels is requesting the following:
1, A conditional use permit (CUP) revision to expand a nonconforming use. Maplewood
Toyota is a nonconforming use because they do not meet the current Shoreland
Ordinance. They are in the Kohiman Lake shoreland area. The Shoreland Ordinance
allows a maximum impervious surface of 40% of their site. Impervious surface is the
area covered by the buildings and paving. Maplewood Toyota already exceeds 40%
because they built in 1981 before the city adopted the Shoreland Ordinance.
2. A conditional use permit for the storage of motor vehicles on a property in the M -1 (light
manufacturing) zoning district. Mr. McDaniels is proposing to build a new vehicle
sales /display lot for his dealership on the northwest corner of Highway 61 and Beam
Avenue. The city code requires conditional use permit for the storage of motor vehicles
in this location.
3. Approval of project plans. This includes the proposed additions to the existing
dealership and the plans for the new sales /display lot. The proposed additions would
match the exterior materials and design of the existing showroom.
Mr. Roberts stated that in 1979 the city council approved the original Maplewood Toyota building
that was completed in 1981. In 1992 the city council granted Maplewood Toyota a CUP to
enlarge their parking lot surface from 66% to 68.7 %. In 1995 they approved plans for a 1,404 -
square- foot - addition on the north side of the building.
Mr. Roberts said that the additions do not cause any problems for the city other than the 375 -
square -feet of impervious surface that would be lost with the addition of the employee lounge.
However, the applicant stated they are proposing to add some green space on the south side of
the building to make up for that. There are not detailed plans to show how that would work at this
time. As far as the parking lot and storage on the north side, this use fits in with the
neighborhood.
Staff recommends that the city require Maplewood Toyota to combine the two parcels together for
tax and identification purposes. This is to ensure that if any time in the future, the property, the
house, and the NURP pond on the west side does not get split off from the parking lot parcel.
This may cause a problem with the shoreland requirements. The proposal as it is now just meets
the shoreland standards of having a maximum of 50% impervious surface when the whole site is
looked at as a whole.
Chairperson Fischer asked staff if - item C. on page 5 is for the community design review board?
Mr. Roberts answered that is correct.
Commissioner Mueller asked staff if the existing driveway at 1241 Beam Avenue is being
� removed?
Mr. Roberts said that is correct, they will construct a new driveway that will connect into the new
parking lot.
Commiss Mueller asked if the house is being rented? He asked if the renters would have a
problem with their driveway being used like this?
Mr. Roberts said that in the past Mr. McDaniels has rented to an employee. The person that
rents this house will have to be understanding of the conditions of the use of the driveway and its
conditions.
Commissioner Rossbach asked staff why the city didn't have a problem with residents being
accessed through a commercial parking lot?
Mr. Roberts answered that it was not ideal, but it will be under one ownership. He felt it was a
better alternative than adding a second driveway for the house and adding more impervious
surface on the site. F,
Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to come forward.
Steve McDaniels, the owner of Maplewood Toyota introduced himself.
Mr. McDaniels stated Maplewood Toyota is very particular about who they would rent that
property to because of the driveway. Currently the renter is the gentleman who had the pumpkin
patch on the corner of Beam Avenue and Highway 61. They have no problem with him having
access to the parking lot. By taking out the driveway it helps them provide a buffer for the two
neighbors affected including the pond and trees. Mr. McDaniels said he spoke with one of the
neighbors recently and they went out and walked the property to see where everything would
take place and the homeowner was fine with what is being proposed. He is going to write a letter
to the council stating this.
Commissioner Rossbach asked Mr. McDaniels what he will do when the ideal renter is gone?
Mr. McDaniels said that they will make sure it is a responsible renter because they are going to
be going through that property.
Commissioner Rossbach asked Mr. McDaniels if he could tell everyone how you do that? He
stated he rents and the best looking people can still destroy property.
Mr. McDaniels commented that he rents to and he would agree with that statement. If the renter
was not the pumpkin patch man then they would have an employee that needs a place to rent.
Commissioner Rossbach asked if it is Mr..McDaniels long -term plans that the piece of property
would remain residential and they would not come back in a few years trying to change that
zoning from residential to commercial?
Mr. McDaniels said he would not do that, he considered that part of the 50 %. That is why he
acquired both pieces of property, to make that corner palatable for Maplewood Toyota to use. It
took a long time to get the property for a reasonable price.
Commissioner Pearson stated he thinks this proposal does a lot to clear up that corner and
relieve traffic problems.
Commissioner Pearson would like to recommend that the city council adopt the resolution on
pages 22 and 23. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to expand a nonconforming
use and for revisions to Maplewood Toyota at 2873 Highway 61. Approval is based on the
findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the .city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Beam Avenue shall not be used for loading or unloading of vehicles.
Commissioner Pearson would also like to recommend that the city council adopt the resolution on
pages 24 -25. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a motor vehicle sales and
display lot on the northwest corner of Beam Avenue and Highway 61. Approval is based on the
findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of
community development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Beam Avenue shall not be used for loading or unloading of vehicles
Commissioner Mueller seconded the motion. Ayes — All
The motion is passed.
Chairperson Fischer asked staff when does this go to city council?
Mr. Roberts answered this will go to the community design review board September 25, and to
the city council October 8, 2001.
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
a. Maplewood Toyota Building Addition /Expansion
2783 and 2889 Maplewood Drive
Secretary Ekstrand said Steve McDaniels, the owner of Maplewood Toyota, is
proposing to add onto his existing building by putting three additions on. There will be
two additions on the north side of the building and one larger addition on the south side
of the building. The southerly addition will be for expanded showroom area, the small
addition on the north side will be a lounge area for employees, and the larger addition
on the north side will be a service area.
The second proposal is to develop a new parking lot/display area across the street from
the dealership on the northwest corner of Highway 61 and Beam Avenue.
Mr. McDaniels is asking for a conditional use permit to expand a nonconforming use
and also a conditional use permit for the storage of motor vehicles on a property in the
M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning district. Both of these items were reviewed by the
planning commission on September 17, 2001, and Will be going to the city council for
final approval or denial.
Staff would like to see the landscape plan expanded to fill out some of the areas along
both street frontages. Mr. McDaniels brought revised landscape drawings and
presented them to the board.
Staff is recommending site lighting be no more than 25 -feet tall as proposed in the new
outdoor lighting ordinance. Mr. McDaniels has assured staff the plans are to install the
shoebox style lighting that he has on his current site. Because this property is within the
Kohlman Lake shoreland boundary area, the applicant has to install a NURP pond on
the northerly property. They also need to stay within the 50 percent impervious- surface
coverage requirement.
Staff also recommended that the proposed easterly curb cut be closed. The city
engineer felt it was too close to the intersection. But in doing so, the city engineers
recommends that the westerly curb cut be widened 30 to 36 feet to have a better turning
radius for vehicles coming and going from that site.
The applicant is hoping this will improve the traffic circulation in the neighborhood with
the proposed parking lot addition and proposed building expansion.
Chairperson Ledvina asked the applicant to come forward.
Mr. Steve McDaniels, the owner of Maplewood Toyota introduced himself.
Mr. McDaniels said he has no comments regarding staff's comments. He feels
eliminating the residential driveway and building the proposed parking lot addition will
alleviate the traffic congestion problems on Beam Avenue.
Board Member Shankar asked Mr. McDaniels if this , proposed parking lot will be for
customer parking or is it for cars for sale ?.
Mr. McDaniels replied it will be for employee parking and new car inventory parking.
Board Member Shankar asked if customers will have to cross Beam Avenue from the
showroom to look at new cars for sale in the proposed parking lot?
Mr. McDaniels answered if they don't have a duplicate car in the showroom or on the
lot, they would be escorted over across the street with a salesperson.
Board Member O -Ison stated she is concerned about the residential house with the
driveway coming out through the proposed parking lot. If you have new car inventory
are you going to have a secure fence around this facility and how are you going to
manage this with private access?
Mr. McDaniels said he owns the house. The gentleman that is currently renting the
house was the pumpkin patch man that was on the corner of Highway 61 and Beam
Avenue. They have known him for 15 years now and don't have a problem with him.
Where the drive comes out is where the employees will park in the daytime. There will
not be cars parked there in the evening. He will be going through the proposed parking
lot during the day once in awhile. They normally rent to someone they know really well
or to an employee.
Board Member Olson asked Mr. McDaniels if this property served as potential
expansion space for Maplewood Toyota where the house is located?
Mr. McDaniels said absolutely not, it has to remain green space. This is a benefit for
the neighborhood and we have no intention of expanding.
Board Member Olson asked Mr. McDaniels what he plans to do for new car security?
Mr. McDaniels said they don't have a big problem. They use security lights and will put
a small 4 -foot fence up.
Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. McDaniels what is the rational for the fencing along
Beam Avenue and not on the other sides?
Mr. McDaniels said the other side is connected to the other building on the north, there
will be a berm going from the south to the north where the house is located. Along
Highway 61 there is a ditch and there is no walking traffic. He said he would take the
fence out if staff doesn't want it there. For security he would like to keep it so people
don't drive through the lot and try to steal cars. The fence doesn't keep people from
stealing cars but if there is a fence up, and it gets torn apart, at least he knows a car
was stolen. Without a fence unless you count cars every day, you really can't tell
immediately that one was stolen over night.
Board Member Jorgenson asked what he will do if the individual that rents the house
moves? And what does he plan on doing to keep the home maintained?
Mr. McDaniels said the gentleman is on a 30 -day lease if he wanted to move. He would
find somebody else he knew well or an employee to rent the home. Any rental
agreement would state the parking lot situation. He just remodeled the whole inside of
the home and plans on keeping the appearance up. He said he keeps the buildings and
properties looking nice. He also anticipates the gentleman would keep renting until he
p g
can't afford it any longer since he rented his last house for 15 years.
Board Member Shankar said it looks like the current Toyota building parking lot is pretty
crowded already, now you are proposing a building addition, what changes are you
proposing on the site for parking?
Mr. McDaniels said they are going to build the proposed parking lot first and then build
the additions. There are 75 employees and their cars will be parked across the street at
the proposed parking addition. That will open up the whole lot and it will no longer be
crowded. They g are not doing the additions to add inventory or add employees, they are
doing it to spread things out more and make traffic flow more smoothly.
Board Member Shankar asked Mr. McDaniels why he needs signage both on the south
and the east side of the building expansion?
Mr. McDaniels said he is just balancing the Kook of the signage on the building by
adding Maplewood to the Toyota sign.
Chairperson Ledvina asked staff to clarify that the community design review board is not
approving signs at this meeting?
Secretary Ekstrand said that is correct. Approval of signs is not in the motion. But it
should probably be added as a standard condition that the applicant must apply
separately for any sign permits for any sign changes. Just so it is clear, the board is
reviewing building design and site layout only.
Board Member Shankar asked Mr. McDaniels if he is adding two new garage doors on
the north side of the building?
Mr. McDaniels said there would be one more garage door. There is a current garage
door on the north side where there is a service lane. They are just bringing the garage
door out so there is a little more space inside. To the east of that there will be another
garage door for parts deliveries.
Chairperson Ledvina asked Mr. McDaniels if he had any comments regarding the
conditions that were required?
Mr. McDaniels said he has no problems with any of the conditions.
Secretary Ekstrand said just as a point of clarification, the planning commission- handled
items A and B on page 5. At this meeting items C and D will be handled. Item C
represents the three building additions and that is where he recommends the additional
p g
condition specifying their signs are subject to permit review and not part of this
approval. Item D., beginning on page 6, is the recommendation for the parking lot site
north of Beam Avenue.
Board Member Olson asked staff if there was a requirement for handicap parking?
Secretary Ekstrand said yes there is. The handicap - parking requirement would not
apply a I when you have inventory parking for cars for sale. Based on customer and
employee parking, they would need to comply with the ADA requirements. He is just
not sure how many p handica spaces would be required at this time. The handicap
parking would need to be on the existing site and not across Beam Avenue in the
proposed parking lot.
Board Member Olson asked if staff is recommending that the curb cut to the east be
eliminated and the curb cut to the west be expanded?
Secretary Ekstrand said that is correct, the city engineer said the curb cut to the west
should be expanded from 30 feet to 36 feet. The applicant's proposed westerly curb cut
shows 36 feet from the revised plan. Secretary Ekstrand also has a revised landscape
plan submitted this evening showing that the applicant has filled in the center areas
along Beam Avenue and Highway 61 street frontages.
Chairperson Ledvina said he had one item to discuss with the board as it relates to the
fencing to the south side of the parking lot. The applicant had indicated a 4 -foot high
fence. Chairperson Ledvina believes that it should be eliminated.
Board Member Jorgenson agreed that the fence should be eliminated. The new
landscape plan also breaks things up.
Chairperson Ledvina said the landscaping will provide some degree of security as well.
If there are trees in the way that would provide security, obviously if a person wants to
steal a car they will drive through a fence whether it will be a 4 -foot high fence or a 10-
foot high fence if they want it that bad.
Chairperson Ledvina said that since the driveway is being eliminated for the residence it
should state that the applicant restore the driveway surface to a vegetated state with
seed or sod.
Frederick Richter, the vice president of Steiner Development, clarified the new
landscaping plans for Maplewood Toyota. The new landscaping is snowdrift crabs,
spirea, daphnia, arborvitae and wild flowers. The landscaping starts in the west, which
is a screened wall of evergreens along the berm and the NURP pond. The corners. of
the property the lot will have evergreens and deciduous trees. The landscaping
between. the corners will be more ground cover with spreading junipers, perennial
flowers, and the snowdrift crab trees. The objective is to meet the landscaping
`conditions and at the same time ensure the public sees the inventory.
Mr. McDaniels asked if he could address the fence issue? He is concerned if he does
not gate the entrance to the parking lot people will be able to drive through the lot. He
would like to fence part of the area and attach a gate to it when they are closed. It's a
small deterrent but at least he would know if someone stole a car or not.
Board Member Olson asked how the resident would get into the parking lot when they
are closed? Will the resident have access or a key?
Mr. McDaniels said he would have to give the gentleman the access code.
Chairperson Ledvina said he has no problem with the gate they are looking for
alternatives to cyclone fencing. If it can be done with planting or landscaping or a little
berming to provide additional security that is what he would like to see.
Board Member Olson told Mr. McDaniels that the plans that members are looking at
shows the fence as stopping at the westerly entrance, with no gate.
Mr. McDaniels said that was an omission on the designer's part. He would put a gate
on the p art of the fence that they are going to retain. We would like to put some type of
a fence that would be acceptable to staff.
Mr. Richter said it has been his experience that a black vinyl chain linked fence at about
4 feet in height looks nice.
Chairperson Ledvina said he wonders what the purpose of the gate is? He understands
it would be for security but what about using the landscaping to deter people?
Mr. McDaniels said it would be for security. If someone wants to steal a car they will
drive right over the landscaping. Someone went through a 1,000 pound gate once and
ruined the truck and couldn't steal it and they left it right out on Beam Avenue. The
fence won't deter the professional but it will deter young teenagers from trying to steal
vehicle.
Board Member Shankar asked Mr. McDaniels how the fence would work with the
pedestrian pathway shown on the plans?
Mr. McDaniels said it would be an open walkway with a 4 -foot opening in the fence
enclosure. He would stripe off the area in the parking lot so people can walk through to
see cars on the lot.
Chairperson Ledvina said to Mr. McDaniels, just for clarification, you said you need the
-fence for security and you can't do that with just landscaping is that correct?
Mr. McDaniels said he needs some kind of fence. It doesn't necessarily need to be a
chain- linked fence if the community design n review board is opposed to chain linked
fences.
Chairperson Ledvina said certainly a fence is not as appealing as a landscaped area.
The board looks at these site plans to enhance the areas, and the features that are
there. There are maintenance issues with the fence down the road.
Mr. McDaniels said he has seen some of the car dealerships bury the posts to come out
of the ground about 3 feet and just space the posts without a fence so they are close
enough so a car can't get through.
Chairperson Ledvina said that would be fine.
Mr. McDaniels said then he would also need to gate the driveway; he just doesn't want
the cars to be freely driven off the lot if someone decides to steal from his car lot.
Mr. McDaniels said people hot wire two cars just to get the truck or car that they want
and drive right over the curb or landscaping.
Board Member Olson said she has no objection to a black vinyl coated chain - linked
fence with landscaping in front of it, especially since this is going to incorporate
employee parking.
Chairperson Ledvina said maybe we could ask the applicant to work with staff at
alternatives to the chain- linked fence. He thinks staff has a good feel for what the
members have in mind.
Mr. McDaniels said that would be fine with him.
Board Member Jorgenson asked if they could berm it a little bit and do a retaining wall
there?
Mr. McDaniels said that would cause drainage problems and also snow plow removal
problems.
Chairperson Ledvina asked if there is a motion?
Board Member Olson said she moves they approve the expansion plans for Maplewood
Toyota presented on September 25, 2001 and the plans for the site south of Beam
Avenue date stamped August 22, 2001 incorporating items C and D on pages 5,6,7,8.
With a note that the sign permit shall be applied for separately and that the east side.
curb cut shall be eliminated on the proposed parking lot to the north of Beam Avenue.
Also, the west entrance be expanded from 30 feet to 36 feet per engineering
recommendations, that the fence, (item 4 b.) be. negotiated with city staff to meet board
specifications and that the end of the pedestrian path be striped off with a minimum 4
foot open walkway gap in the fence at that area.
Chairperson Ledvina made a friendly amendment to item D. 4. and D. 5. on page 7 that
would state the applicant shall restore the turf for the area where the residential drive is
removed. He would also like to clarify that members are looking at plans date stamped
August 22, 2001 and also the landscape plan, submitted to the community design
review board on September 25, 2001. Also, clarifying that the signs that are indicated
on the proposed plans are not approved at this time. The applicant must submit a sign
permit for specific plans on the building.
C. Approve the plans (date stamped September 25, -2001) for three building additions to
Maplewood Toyota. This approval is based on the findings required by the city code.
The approval shall be subject to the applicant or owner meeting the following conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall:
a. Provide a plan for city staff approval for any roof - mounted equipment
that may be added on top of the proposed additions. (code
requirement)
b. Provide a lighting plan for city staff approval for any additional
exterior security lighting that may be needed.
C. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a
building permit:
(1) Final parking lot, grading drainage, utility and erosion control
plans. These plans shall meet the requirements of the city code
and the city engineer. These shall include:
(a) Showing all drive aisles at 24 feet in width.
(b) Having handicap - parking spaces that meet the requirements
of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
(c) All customer and employee parking areas meeting city code
standards.
3. Complete the following before occupying the additions:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Paint all rooftop mechanical equipment to match the uppermost part
of the building. The owner or contractor shall screen any new roof-
mounted equipment that is visible to residential property. (code
requirement)
C. Stripe any new customer and visitor parking spaces at a width of 9'/z
feet and the employee vehicle parking spaces at a width of nine feet.
d. Install fire protection and alarm systems as required by the fire
marshal.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
b. The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the
unfinished work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by
June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six
weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or
summer.
C. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete
any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
6. This approval does not include signs. The applicant shall apply for sign permits
for any proposed sign changes.
D. Approve the plans (date stamped September 25, 2001) for a motor vehicle sales and
display lot on the northwest corner of Beam Avenue and Highway 61. This approval
shall be subject to the findings required by the code and is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. The applicant shall get a demolition permit from the city for the house at 2889
Highway 61.
---~ - 3. The applicant's engineer shall provide the city engineer with the drainage
calculations and design criteria for the proposed NURP pond.
4. Before the city issues a grading permit, the applicant s -hall:
a. Combine the two parcels for tax and identification purposes. The
applicant shall record the paper work for this combination before the
city approves the permits for this project.
b. Work with staff to develop a fence plan to meet board specifications.
The end of the pedestrian path shall be striped with a minimum 4 -foot
open walkway gap in the fence at that area.
C. Revise the plans for staff approval as follows:
(1) For the parking lot, show:
a. Paving of the new driveway to the house and garage at
1241 Beam Avenue with bituminous.
b. The elimination of the driveway nearest Highway 61 and
revising the westerly driveway so that it is 30 -36 feet
wide. This driveway on Beam Avenue shall have an
entrance lane, a left -turn exit lane and a straight exit.
These lanes shall be marked with painted arrows on the
pavement depicting the turning movement.
c. All drive aisles at 24 feet in width and all customer and
employee parking areas meeting city code standards.
The city will not regulate the width of parking spaces for
the vehicle sales lot. However, the city will require
striped spaces for the neat and orderly parking and
storage of vehicles.
c. Submit a photometric- lighting plan that meets the standards of the
city lighting code for staff approval. This plan shall show:
(1) The light spread and fixture design. The tense covering the bulb
shall be concealed or aimed so not to cause a nuisance to drivers
or to neighbors.
(2) That-the site lights will not exceed 25 feet in height.
d. Make changes to the landscape plan for staff approval including:
1. Showing an in- ground irrigation system for all landscape
areas. This shall include the landscape areas around all
sides of the parking lot and for the boulevards along Beam
Avenue and Highway 61.
2. Adding several ornamental trees and shrubbery along
Highway 61 frontage between the proposed tree planting
areas on the corners.
3. Showing a variety of materials along Beam Avenue between
the westerly driveway and the highway. This should include
shrubs, ornamental trees and planting beds with perennials,
along with coniferous trees, along Beam Avenue.
4. Showing that the screening on the west side of the proposed
N U RP pond will be at least six feet tall and at least 80
percent opaque.
e. Get a building permit for the proposed retaining wall if any part of
the wall is more than four feet tall.
6. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for
the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the
unfinished work.
C. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete
any unfinished work.
6. The future proposed building shown in the parking lot is not approved. If the
applicant chooses to construct this building, they must submit the plans to the
city for approval.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development
may approve minor changes.
8. The applicant shall restore the turf for the area where the residential drive is to be
removed.
9. The pedestrian walkway shown be moved 40 feet to the east both on the north
and the south side of Beam Avenue.
Board Member-Jorgenson seconded the motion. Ayes — All
The motion is passed.
AGENDA ITEM 17 '
Acdon by f ;i
AGENDA REPORT
Date,._,._.
Endorsee
TO: City Manager Modifies: _
Rejected
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of Bids, Bush Avenue Improvements, Stillwater Road to Bartelmy
Lane, City Project 01 -04 /Ripley Avenue, White Bear Avenue to VanDyke
Street, City Project 99 -12
DATE: October 1, 2001
Bids for the Bush Avenue Improvement, Stillwater Road to Bartelmy Lane, Project 01-
04, and Ripley Avenue, White Bear Avenue to VanDyke Street, Project 99 -12, are
scheduled to be opened at 10 a.m. on Friday, October 5, 2001. These two projects are
being bid out as a package bid.
A tabulation of those bids, a staff recommendation, as well as the corresponding
resolution, will be made available with a supplementary report to be inserted into the
agenda packet at that time.
CIVIC
jw
H
AGENDA ITEM —T
AGENDA REPORT
T0: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Award of Bids, Bush Avenue Improvements, City Project 01 -04 and Ripley
Avenue Improvements, City Project 99 -12.
DATE: October 1, 2001
Bids for the Bush Avenue and Ripley Avenue joint - project were opened at 10:00 a.m.
on Friday, October 5, 2001. Attached is a Tabulation of Bids and recommendation
from the city's consultant, TKDA.
There were four bids received, which ranged from a low of $373,775.95 to a high of
$541,027.50. The engineer's estimate was $412,679.50.
The low bid was submitted by Palda & sons, Inc., in the amount of $373,775.95. The
contractor, Palda & Sons, Inc., has not done any recent Maplewood projects. Palda &
Sons, Inc. a reputable contractor who has done a number of municipal and state aid
projects in the metropolitan area.
Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution for award
of bids to Palda & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $373,775.95.
CIVIC
uL� b9 -001 15 b51 292 0093 P.02/14
TOLTZ, KINd. .
TKD M AND ASSOCIATES. DUV ANDERS
E
E NGINEERS * ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 1500 PIPER JAFFAAY PLAZA
E 444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL. MWNESOTA SS.10 -2140
PHONE: 8511292 -4400 FAX. 5511292.0083
October 8, 2001
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
1830 County Road B Last
Maplewood, Minnesota 551.09
Re: Ripley Avenue 99 -12
Bush Avenue 01- 10
City of Maplewood, Min nesota
TKDA Commission No. 12375 -01
Bear Honorable Mayor an City Co uncil Members:
Bids for the referenced P roject were received on October 5, 200 1, with the following results. A
complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information.
Co ntractor Base Bid
Palda and Sons Inc. $373,775.95
D anner, In $426,147.32
Forest Lake Contracting Inc. $457438.80
Carl Bolander and Sons $541,027
Engineer's Estimate $412
Recommendation-
we recommend that you award the Contract to Palda and Sons, Inc. for their low bid of
$373
Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
Enclosure
An Equal Oppoffvniry Employer
r�
0
RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
that the bid of Palda & Sons, Inc. in the amount of .$373,775.95 is the lowest
responsible bid for the construction of the Bush Avenue Improvements, City Project
01 -04 and the Ripley Avenue Improvements, City Project 99 -12, and the mayor and
clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and
on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized-to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project.
Proposed financing
BUSH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT 01 -04
Street Assessments
$
92,000
Storm Water Assessments
$
3
Water Service Assessments
$
1
Sanitary Sewer Assessments
$
1
Sewer Utility Fund
$
9
SPRWS Obligation
$
-
City Tax Levy
$ 216.514
Total
$
325,000
RIPLEY AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, CITY PROJECT 99 -12
Ramsey County Obligation
City Tax Levy
Total
$ 170,000
$ 0
$ 170,000
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Agenda # k1l
Action by Council
Date
Endorsed
Mod ifiM
City Manager Rejecte
Shann Finwall Associate Planner
Moratorium on Development in the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area
October 1, 2001
INTRODUCTION
On July % 2001, the city council formally supported a concept design for the Hillcrest Village
Redevelopment Area. Hillcrest Village ' is part of the Metropolitan Council's smart growth initiative
to create livable neighborhoods where homes, jobs, and services are linked by walkable streets.
The concept was developed by the design firm of Calthorpe Associates from smart growth
workshops held by the Metropolitan Council for the Hillcrest shopping center and contiguous
commercial .properties in Maplewood and St. Paul (refer to the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment
Area map attached for exact location).
Project Description
In order to reflect the proposed Hillcrest Village design concepts in the City of Maplewood's zoning
ordinances, zoning map, and comprehensive plan, staff is proposing a One -year moratorium on
developments within the area. The moratorium will allow staff to coordinate with the Metropolitan
Council, City of St. Paul, White Sear .Avenue Business Association, hired consultants, property
owners, interested citizens, and the city council in developing design criteria for the area based on
smart growth objectives.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached Hillcrest Village Moratorium Ordinance. This ordinance establishes aone -year
(October 8, 2002) moratorium on development within the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area.
p:ordlhillcrest village moratorium staff report
Attachment: Moratorium Ordinance
Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTECTING THE PLANNING
PROCESS AND DEVELOPING BUILDING AND DESIGN STANDARDS FOR
THE HILLCREST VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
The area under consideration (hereinafter "Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area ")
includes land north of Larpenteur Avenue, east of White Bear Avenue, south of Ripley
Avenue, and west of Hazel Street; also including properties on the west side of White
Bear Avenue located north of Larpenteur Avenue and south of Frost Avenue (refer to
Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area map attached for exact location).
The Maplewood City Council ordains:
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
1.01 The City of Maplewood, in cooperation with. the Metropolitan Council and the City
of St. Paul, are currently conducting a smart growth initiative study that includes
land use planning components for the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area.
1.02 The objective of the study is to design a land use concept for the Hillcrest Village
Redevelopment Area. This information will help create a livable neighborhood
where homes, jobs, and services are linked by walkable streets.
1.03 In addition to the study, the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, and
comprehensive plan may need to be revised to reflect the following issues:
- Land use
- Building setbacks
- Building height
Design standards for buildings
- Pedestrian flow and safety
- Parking
- Streetscaping
Signage
- Lighting
- Landscaping
- Housing density
1.04 There is a need for these studies to be conducted so that the city can adopt
changes to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, comprehensive plan, and
design standards for the development of the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment
Area.
ATTACHMENT 1
2
SECTION 2. REDEVELOPMENT STUDY; MORATORIUM
2.01 The study is authorized by the city. City staff shall coordinate this study with the
Metropolitan Council, City of St. Paul, White Bear Avenue Business Association,
hired consultants, property owners, interested citizens, and the city council.
2.02 Upon completion of the study, it shall be presented to the planning commission
and community design review board commission for their review and
recommendation to the city council.
�- 2.03 A moratorium on development in the Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area is
adopted pending completion of the study and /or the adoption of any amendments
to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, or comprehensive plan as deemed
necessary as a result of the study. The city will not approve any subdivision or
building permit for a new building during the moratorium period. Th city may
issue building permits for the expansion or remodeling of existing structures.
SECTION 3. TERM
3.01 The term of ordinance shall be for one year or until such time as the city council
adopts amendments to the city's zoning ordinance, zoning map, or comprehensive
plan as deemed necessary as a result of the study.
SECTION 4. VARIANCES
4.01 Variances from this ordinance may be granted by the city council based upon a
determination that a proposed subdivision or development would be compatible
with proposed land use and zoning, and that such proposals would keep with the
spirit and intent of this ordinance. The procedures to be followed in applying for a
variance from this ordinance shall be in accordance with state law on findings for
variances and shall include the following:
a. The applicant shall file a completed application form, together with
required exhibits, to the Community Development Department.
b. The application for a variance shall set forth special circumstances or
conditions which the appl alleges to exist, and shall demonstrate that
the proposed subdivision or development is compatible with existing or
proposed land use and zoning.
C. The application shall be submitted to the planning commission for their
review and recommenda to the city council.
d. The city council may in its discretion set a public hearing prior to making a
final determination on the requested variance.
e. The city council may impose such restrictions upon the proposed
subdivision or development as may be necessary to comply with the
purpose and intent of this ordinance.
3
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
5.01 This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on
2001.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
p:ordlhillcrest village moratorium
Attachment: Hillcrest Village Redevelopment Area
4
City of Maplewood
Hillcrest Village
Redevelopment Area
5
Attachment 2
Larpenteur Avenue
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer
Action by Cbulicq
Date
EndarAd
Modified
.Rej
SUBJECT: Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 00 -04
Gladstone West Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 00 -05
Approve Private Agreements - (Certification of Unpaid Agreements).
DATE: October 1, 2001
Introduction
Attached 'is a summarized list of the private agreements between the city and various residents
on the above - referenced projects. The list includes the amounts paid in full including any
amounts that remain unpaid and should be certified to Ramsey County for collection with
property taxes. At this time, the exact final amounts to be certified have not been determined on
a small number of agreements and those are listed as estimates at this time.
Background
During the design phase of the Tilsen South Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project
00 -04, it became apparent that the city needed to have a mechanism to allow residents to do
some "extra" work at their expense. An example of this would be the widening of a driveway
opening.
However as the project moved into the construction phase, it immediately became apparent that
there was a need that was unimaginable. There was so much demand on the part of the
residents to have full driveways done that it was decided to expand the private agreements to
include full driveways. The contractor had agreed to do the work at the contract prices. For
continuity sake, the program was also offered to the residents on the Gladstone West project.
In the end, there were 170 private driveway agreements made with residents from both projects,
totaling approximately $201,600. Of those, 71 residents, with agreements totaling approximately
$106,800, have chosen to finance this work through a certification of the amount to their property
taxes. These agreements have resulted in a significant increase in the contract amounts.
All agreements state that the cost for this "extra" work shall be paid for by the property owner,
either in the form of a payment to the City of Maplewood or in the form of an assessment to the
property. The property owner acknowledged in the agreement that they agreed not to object to
or appeal an assessment for this work. The agreement states that the certified agreement will
be payable over an 8 -year period at 5.8 %.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the city council authorize the city engineer and city clerk to certify
all unpaid private agreements to Ramsey County and direct the finance director to revise
financing accordingly.
Budget Impact
Essentially there is little impact to the project budget. The resultant increase in the construction
cost. is fully funded through the private agreements. The private agreements include overhead
costs to cover the increased city staff time and fiscal expenses that are required to manage the
agreements. The bonding amount will increase to cover the agreements being certified to
property taxes.
CMC
jw
Attachments
DRIVEWAYS: PROJECT 00 -04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
ADJ + / -*
DATE PD
RECEIPT
LOT 10 BLK 6 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
12922240090
HEIGHTS NO 8
SAMUEL MESROUBIAN
SYLVIA J MESROUBIAN
2879
BARTELMY LN N
$1,350.65
$0.00
LOT 5 BLK 5 ROBERT
12922240059
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
DOUGLAS P OLSON
SUSAN K OLSON
2880
BARTELMY LN N
$893.53
$0.00
LOT 9 BLK 6 ROBERT
12922240091
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
RONALD L PEARSON
ILENE C PEARSON
2887
BARTELMY LN N
$1
$0.00
LOT 4 BLK 5 ROBERT
12922240058
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
PAUL V ELLEFSON
PEGGY A ELLEFSON
2888
BARTELMY LN N
$666.06
$0.00
LOT 8 BLK 6 ROBERT
12922240092
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
MICHAEL P EARLEY
CAROLE J EARLEY
2895
BARTELMY LN N
$614.47
$0.00
LOT 7 BLK 6 ROBERT
12922240093
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
H EIGHTS NO 8
WILLIAM R LANGENBERGER
BARBARA A LANGENBERGER
2903
BARTELMY LN N
$419.44
$0.00
LOT 8 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240046
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
GARY J HAIDER
SANDRA K HAIDER
2934
BARTELMY LN N
$397.80
917101
$397.80
14753
LOT 7 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240045
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
BHUPAT N DESAI
KUMMD B DESAI
2944
BARTELMY LN N
$1,783.97
$0.00
LOT 6 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240044
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
KENNETH R ROSSOW
BARBARA E ROSSOW
2950
BARTELMY LN N
$3,108.69
$0.00
LOT 5 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240043
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
ROSEMARY B BARTLEY
2958
BARTELMY LN N
$803.60
8/17/01
$803.60
13079
LOT 4 BLK 6 ROBERT
12922240068
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
LOIS RUTH OLSON
2965
BARTELMY LN N
$527.24
8/17/01
$527.24
13089
LOT 2 BLK 6 ROBERT
12922240066
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
RICHARD G LANGENBERGER
2985
BARTELMY LN N
$56.43
8122/01
$56.43
13096
LOT 6 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922240033
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
JOSEPHINE B POLUBINSKY
2986
BARTELMY LN N
$952.56
8123/01
$952.56
13099
LOT 5 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922130005
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO
RICHARD C BENNETT
JANE L BENNETT
2962
BEEBE PKY N
$1,663.52
9/7/01
$1
14755
88.13+
LOT 3 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922130003
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
MILFORD P OLSON
JOYCE L OLSON
2974
BEEBE PKY N
$1,047.38
8128/01
$1,047.38
14708
LOT 3 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922130008
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
PETER H CARLILE
PAMELA G CARLILE
2977
BEEBE PKY N
$1,732.64
$0.00
22922130002
LOT 2 BLK 1 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
RUSSELL J HULDEEN
MARLA J HULDEEN
2984
BEEBE PKY N
$933.95
$0.00
LOT 2 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922130007 1
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
HARRY J TEVLIN III
BARBARA J HOLISKY
2987
BEEBE PKY N
$1,644.48
915/01
$1,644.48
14730
10/2/01
..._. -,;_ ...... ..... ... ... ....._ ..... ..,.. ..,.�,- ....«,.,,.....n. -... i�.r:...,.., �..« -��, .. r' ....... ...»......�..�r»�. -.... ., w -. �ww%:^.. ..,rY �^ +mm..r•n er.•• -.•
___ _ .n.....e....., . v.r• .s <y. -r.�rr ,...- .. - ..wm. , ^wvs�ew!+.�+F!y J ^tto^� aR .^` . . •rv.•— ........y- i! r?�^..' _ _
DRIVEWAYS PROJECT 00-04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
ADJ + / -*
DATE PD
RECEIPT
LOT 1 BLK 2 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922130006
HEIGHTS NO 6
THOMAS W MYSTER
ARLENE W MYSTER
2993
BEEBE PKY N
$1,150.82
9/4101
$1,150.82
14719
LOT 1 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922130001
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO6
WILLIAM H MUND
2994
BEEBE PKY N
$1,616.80
$0.00
LOT 3 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922240075
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 7
TERRY R SIBBALD
DONNA O SIBBALD
2929
CHIPPEWA AVE N
$4,646.79
9/6101
$4,646.79
14746
LOT 8 BLK3 ROBERT
12922240083
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS N 8
MICH B GRIM
ROBIN L WALTHER
2378
CHIPPEWA CIR E
$824.19
9/6101
$824.19
14739
LOT 7 BLK3 ROBERT
12922240082
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
SEAN P NICHOLSON
CAROL A NICHOLSON
2381
CHIPPEWA CIR E
$1
$0.00
LOT 6 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922130021
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
TODD T HAWKINS
DENELLE A HAWKINS
2966
CHISHOLM PKY N
$2,822.19
9/6/01
$2,695.35
14741
126.84+
9/14/01
1 4780
LOT 3 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922130028
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
MARC J PAUL
SARA T PAUL
2979
CHISHOLM PKY N
$1
9118/01
$1,302.92
14788
LOT 9 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922130024
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
SALVATION ARMY
JOHN CRAMPTON
2980
CHISHOLM PKY N
$916.31
9/4/01
$916.31
14722
LOT 6 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922130011
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
WAYNE L RASMUSSEN
MARILYN J RASMUSSEN
2964
FREDERICK PKY N
$1,341.35
$0.00
LOT 4 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922130019
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
PETER J ORME
PATRICIA M ORME
2971
FREDERICK PKY N
$1,433.43
9/10/01
$1,433.43
14761
LOT 7 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922130012
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
THOMAS A ERICKSON
DOROTHY A ERICKSON
2972
FREDERICK PKY N
$499.73
$0.00
LOT 3 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922130018
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
MARK P FARAGHER
CHERI G FARAGHER
2975
FREDERICK PKY N
$757.98
$0.00
LOT 8 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922130013
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 6
BEE VUE
LAMENA VUE
2976
FREDERICK PKY N
$1,080.67
$0.00
LOT 3 BLK 9 ROBERT
22922140085
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
LOREN SMEESTER
MARILYN SMEESTER
2909
FURNESS ST N
$670.32
8/21/01
$670.32
13093
LOT 2 BLK 9 ROBERT
22922140084
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
SAM DANNA JR
DONNA M D
2917
FURNESS ST N
$595.84
$0.00
LOT 3 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922140075
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
JAMES J HURT
JOAN M HURT..
2983
FURNESS ST N
$254.85
8/30/01
$254.85
14715
LOT 1 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140059
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
GERALD L BERGSRUD
JUDITH A BERGSRUD
2990
FURNESS ST N
$510.83
9/6/01
$510.83
14744
LOT 17 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922140024
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
JOHN C WADLUND
THERESA B WADLUND
2950
HOWARD CT N 11
$827.12
$0.00
10/2/01
DRIVEWAYS: PROJECT 00 -04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
ADJ +l -*
DATE PD
RECEIPT
LOT 18 BLK 1 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922140025
HEIGHTS NO 4
ROBERT J KUJAWSKI
DELORES M KUJAWSKI
2956
HOWARD CT N
$975.85
915/01
$975.85
14725
22922140020
KEITH C CAMPBELL
LINDA J CAMPBELL
2926
HOWARD ST N
$496.69
8/23/01
$496.69
13098
LOT 9 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140039
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
DAVID W KRAMER
BETTY KRAMER
2941
HOWARD ST N
$258.80
8/28/01
$258.80
14707
LOT 8 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140038
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
ROBERT R ROZMARYNOWSKI
DONNA M ROZMARYNOWSKI
2947
HOWARD ST N
$700.71
$0.00
LOT 7 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140037
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
JOHN W BECK
PATRICIA D BECK
2953
HOWARD ST N
$800.67
$0.00
LOT 20 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922140027
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO
WILLIAM G TIMM
DARLENE D TIMM
2968
HOWARD ST N
$330.27
8/17/01
$330.27
13083
LOT 21 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922140028
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
GREGORY J BAUER
PATRICIA A BAUER
2974
HOWARD ST N
$627.20
8/17/01
$627.20
13081
1 22922140029
LOT 22 BLK 1 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
MARK L CHAPEA
NORA M CHAPEAU
2980
HOWARD ST N
$691.88
$0.00
LOT 2 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140032
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
ROSS M STITES
SHANNON I STITES
2983
HOWARD ST N
$636.03
$0.00
LOT 23 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922140030
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
JOHN R MARTIN
JUNE E MARTIN
2986
HOWARD ST N
$683.07
8/17/01
$683.07
13087
LOT 1 BLK 1 ROBERT
22922140001
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 4
GARY L BJORNBERG
CHERYL A BJORNBERG
2992
HOWARD ST N
$458.64
8/17101
$458.64•
13085
LOT 1 BLK 8 ROBERT
22922140088
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
DONALD L MURPHY
JEANNE D MURPHY
2162
MAPLE LN E
$476.28
8/17/01
$476.28
13077
LOT 2 BLK 10 ROBERT
22922140045
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
SCOTT A SCHMIDT
TAMMY R SCHMIDT
2171
MAPLE LN E
$322.78
8/21/01
$322.78
13094
LOT 3 BLK 10 ROBERT
22922140044
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
GREGORY OCONNOR
MARY OCONNOR
2177
MAPLE LN E
$676.95
9/6/01
$676.95
14737
LOT4 BLK 8 ROBERT
22922140091
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
JAMES J JIRELE
THERESA L JIRELE
2182
MAPLE LN E
$237.25
8/27/01
$237.25
14704
LOT 4 BLK 10 ROBERT
22922140043
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
GRACE M HEINBUCH
2183
MAPLE LN E
$536.07
8/17/01
$536.07
13084
LOT 6 BLK 6 ROBERT
22922140093
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3
EUGENE M GELAO
BEVERLY J GELAO
2194
MAPLE LN E
$564.48
9/5/01
$564.48
14727
LOT 7 BLK 8 ROBERT
22922140094 1
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 3 IT
W SWANSON
JUNE D SWANSON
2204
MAPLE LN E
$613.70
9/5/01
$613.70
14724
3 10/2/01
DRIVEWAYS: PROJECT 00-04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
ADJ +! -*
DATE PD
RECEIPT
LOT 3 BLK 11 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922140017
HEIGHTS NO 3
JEROME J DEROSE
2223
MAPLE LN E
$705.60
8/30/01
$705.60
14713
LOT 7 BLK 11 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922140013
HEIGHTS NO 3
MARY A RAFFERTY
2251
MAPLE LN E
$650.67
916101
$650.67
14736
LOT 17 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
12922230035
HEIGHTS NO.7
KIM M BUGGE
2288
MA PLE LN E
$913.85
9/6/01
$913.85
14747
LOT 10 BLK 2 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
12922230057
HEIGHTS NO.7
BRUCE D JESKE
CATHY A JESKE
2349
MAPLE LN E
$629.16
8/27/01
$629.16
14706
LOT 28 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
12922230046
HEIGHTS NO.7
MICHAEL A SEMONICK JR
JANICE M SEMONICK
2350
MAPLE LN E
$465.23
8/21/01
$465.23
13095
LOT 16 BLK 2 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922420014
HEIGHTS
STEVEN J BLOM
LYNNE A BLOM
2105
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$803.97
9/7/01
$803.97
14750
LOT 1 BLK 5 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922420021
HEIGHTS
JANET L SKJERVEN
2114
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1,325.37
$0.00
LOT 2 BLK 5 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922420022
HEIGHTS
JOHN L BRENNHOFER
KARA L BRENNHOFER
2120
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$826.60
917/01
$926.31
14749
99.71-
1011/01
61717
LOT 10 BLK 2 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410030
HEIGHTS
JASON O'LEARY
2149
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$205.53
LOT 2 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410034
HEIGHTS
LAINE P MILLER
SUZANNE J MILLER
2170
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$801.28
$0.00
LOT 27 BLK 3 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
-
22922410027
HEIGHTS
JOHN C DICKS
JUDY E DICKS
2171
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1,445.84
9/6/01
$1
14733
23.52+
LOT 3 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410035
HEIGHTS
JEFFREY M NICOL
LAURA J NICOL
2178
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1
$0.00
LOT 4 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410036
HEIGHTS
RONALD JOEL CHAPMAN
2184
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1,507.47
$0.00
LOT 5 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410037
HEIGHTS
MICHAEL C SKAAR
CAROLYN M SKAAR
2190
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1
$0.00
LOT 21 BLK 3 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410021
HEIGHTS
DONALD D LUNZER JR
NANCY J LUNZER
2211
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$256.64
9/4/01
$256.64
14721
LOT 19 BLK 3 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410019
HEIGHTS
PAUL J WOLFRAM
CHERYL M WOLFRAM
2225
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$189.80
9/4/01
$189.80
14723
LOT 18 BLK 3 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410018
HEIGHTS
G WINSTON ANDERSON
2231
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$3
9/5/01
$3
14728
LOT 11 BLK 4 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
22922410043 1HEIGHTS
JOHN W REDSHAW d
RENAY J REDSHAW
2232
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1
$0.00
10/2/01
DRIVEWAYS: PROJECT 00-04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
ADJ + / -*
DATE PD RECEIPT
LOT 15 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922410015
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
KEVIN JENSEN
DEBBIE JENSEN
2253
MAPLEVIEW AVE E
$1,304.07
$0.00
LOT 15 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240013
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
PAUL WAGENBACH
LAURIANN WAGENBACH
2880
MARY LN N
$561.38
$0.00
LOT 13 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240015
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
JOEL A BELMARES
CLAIRE C BELMARES
2892
MARY LN N
$766.36
$0.00
LOT 10 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240048
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS No a
WAYNE R GOEPPINGER
LINDA A GOEPPINGER
2915
MARY ST N
$1,723.41
$0.00
LOT 11 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240049
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
THOMAS D MCGRANE
KAREN A MCGRANE
2921
MARY ST N
$906.79
$0.00
LOT 12 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240050
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
ROBERT E DUNHAM
2929
MARY ST N
$1
9/7/01
$1
14756
LOT 8 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240020
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
STEPHEN MARK THOLE
2944
MARY ST N
$937.87
8117101
$937.87
13086
LOT 7 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240021
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
MICHAEL J LOFGREN
KAREN A LOFGREN
2950
MARY ST N
$922.00
8117101
$922.00
13088
LOT 16 BLK 4 ROBERT
12922240054
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
RAY DIEKRAGER TRUSTEE
2951
MARY ST N
$937.02
8/17/01
$937.02
13082
LOT 6 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240022
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
THOMAS A ACHESON
MARY L ACHESON
2956
MARY ST N
$6,110.25
$0.00
LOT 5 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240023
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
MICHAEL A INSERRA
2962
MARY ST N
$1,169.15
$0.00
LOT 4 BLK 3 ROBERT
t
12922240024
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS No 8
W BRUCE ROBINSON
JUDITH L ROBINSON
2968
MARY STN
$765.39
$0.00
LOT 3 BLK 3 ROBERT
12922240025
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
PETER E MARCACCINI
DEBORAH M MARCACCINI
2978
MARY ST N
$712.47
$0.00
LOT 1 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922240028
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
1 9, 11 M. V. -
'T"
ROBERT L OHS
SANDRA C HAHN
2995
MARY ST N
$1,549.12
916/01
$1
14743
FT OF HE E 570 FT LYING S
OF RADATZ AVE OF NE 1/4
22922310061
OF SW 1/4 IN SEC 2 TN 29
RN 22
ROBERT E SEARCY
1976
RADATZ AVE E
$1
$0.00
OF E 470 FT OF PART OF NE
1/4 OF SW 1/4 OS OF
22922310027
RADATZ AVE IN SEC 2 TN 29
RN 22
EUGENE A GANZER
1984
RADATZ AVE E
$2,771.18
9/6/01
$2
14732
650.72+
THE S 1/2 OF THE E 100 FT
OF W 220 FT OF NW 114 OF
22922420042
NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO
RD) IN SEC 1 TN 29 RN 22
GEOFFREY P BULL
LAURA J BULL
2035
RADATZ AVE E
$1,192.19
916/01
$1,192.19
14734
SUBJ TO AVE THE S 1/2 OF E
75 FT OFW495FTOFNW
22922420039 129
1/4 OF SE 114 OF SEC 2 TN
RN 22
CARLA MARIE SWANSON
2061
RADATZ AVE E
$1 133.64
9/5/01
$1,133.64
14701
10/2/01
DRIVEWAYS: PROJECT 00-04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
HEIGHTS OF W 76FT OF E
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
AN + / -*
DATE PD
RECEIPT
1842 FT PART OF E 314 OF N
22922420019
114 OF SE 1/4 N OF AYE IN
SEC 2 T29 R 22
EUGENE J SZYBATKA
MARCELLINE SZYBATKA
2101
1 RADATZ AVE E
$3,260.40
PART, BET MAPLEVIEW AVE
& RADATZ AVE, OF W 76 FT
22922420020
OF E 1766 FT OF N 114 OF SE
1/4 OF SEC 2 TN 29 RN 22
DUWAYN L MORITZ
JEANNINE E MORITZ
2111
RADATZ AVE E
$4 9 566.64
$0.00
LOT 12 BLK 5 ROBERT
22922420030
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
TIMOTHY K ROBINSON
BRENDA A ROBINSON
2115
RADATZ AVE E
$787.73
9/7/01
$786.74
14751
.99+
LOT 7 BLK 5 ROBERT
22922410032
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
JOSEPH E BELLAND
TAMARA J BELLAND
2149
RADATZ AVE E
$1,650.62
$0.00
LOT 28 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922410060
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
ROBERT STAGGS
JANIE K STAGGS
2163
RADATZ AVE E
$2,164.96
916/01
$1
14745
348.72+
LOT 23 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922410055
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
GARY L LECLAIRE
2197
RADATZ AVE E
$1,383.29
$0.00
LOT 20 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922410052
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
GREGORY A ROTH
DONNA J TONNLEY
2219
RADATZ AVE E
$927.15
$0.00
LOT 17 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922410049
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
JOHN A BAILEY
2239,
RADATZ AVE E
$1 9 491.56
$0.00
LOT 15 BLK 4 ROBERT
22922410047
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS
JAMES M STELLA
2253'
RADATZ AVE E
$5,698.37
$0.00
LOT 10 BLK 1 ROBERT
12922230015
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
KENNETH M PADDOCK
CAROLE A PADDOCK
2293
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$5 9 964.47
$0.00
LOT 9 BLK 1 ROBERT
12922230014
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
RANDAL C BURNS
KATHLEEN BURNS
2301
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$1,250.78
$0.00
LOT 16 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922230063
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
BRUCE A FERRY
JEAN J FERRY
2308
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$1,139.75
916101
$1,139.75
14735
LOT 5 BLK 1 ROBERT
12922230010
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
GARRETT W YOUNG
JOYCE N YOUNG
2329
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$680.72
-
$0.00
LOT 4 BLK 1 ROBERT
12922230009
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
JAMES M HONSA
KAY A GROETSCH
2335
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$823.13
9/5101
$823.13 1
14726
LOT 23 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922230070
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
ELVIN L ERICKSON
KAREN R ERICKSON
2352
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$279.03
8/22/01
$279.03
13097
LOT 24 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922230071
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
URSULA C HUEBSCH
2358
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$338.33
8117/01
$338.33
13080
12922230073
LOT 26 BLK 2 ROBERT
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
JAMES A WESTMAN
MARY G WESTMAN
2370
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$808.01
8/27/01
$808.01
14705
LOT11 BLK 1 ROBERT
92922230004
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO. a
STEPHEN J MAJOR
SHARON M MAJOR
2375
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$1
9/7/01
$1 372.92
14752
10/2/01
DRIVEWAYS: PROJECT 00-04, TILSEN SOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS
PIN
LEGAL
OWNER
OWNER
#
STREET NAME
FINAL COST
DATE
AMT PAID
RECEIPT
I ADJ + / -*
DATE PD
RECEIPT
LOT 27 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922230074
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
MICHAEL E POGALZ
LINDA D POGALZ
2376
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$1,691.25
9/4101
$1
14717
LOT 28 BLK 2 ROBERT
12922230075
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO.7
ANTHONY J FROLIK
JENNIFER L FROLIK
2384
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$1
8117/01
$1,508.23
13078
LOT 7 BLK 6 ROBERT
12922240071
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 8
LARRY D BURNS
2391
STANDRIDGE AVE E
$977.16
8/29/01
$977.16
14710
LOT 10BLK 3 ROBERT
22922140049
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
ERIC T ERICKSON
SUE M ERICKSON
2942
WINTHROP DR N
$1
$0.00
LOT 7 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922140052
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS No 6
JOHN C KOBINSKI
2962
WINTHROP DR N
$892.51
$0.00
LOT 7 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140065
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
H CRAIG SEYFORTH
MARY H SEYFORTH
2963
WINTHROP DR N
$658.57
8123/01
$658.57
66021
LOT 5 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922140054
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
BRETT J BELISLE
LAURIE A BELISLE
2974
WINTHROP DR N
$1
9/6/01
$1,042.34
14738
LOT 5 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140063
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
JAMES W SEPION
MARGARET M SEPION
2979
WINTHROP DR N
$209.96
9/7101
$209.96
14754
LOT 4 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922140055
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
ROBERT A BENSON
CONSTANCE H BENSON
2982
WINTHROP DR N
$1
8/17101
$1,008.14
13076
LOT 4 BLK 2 ROBERT
22922140062
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS NO 5
JAY L BRENNECKE
MARLYCE A CHRISTIANSON
2987
WINTHROP DR N
$1,244.60
$0.00
LOT 3 BLK 3 ROBERT
22922140056
TILSEN'S MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS No 5
JOHN L FONTAINE
2988
WINTHROP DR N
$1 9 125.38
9/6/01
$1 9 125.38
14742
Totals $142,683.76 $65
* Adjustment resulting from change in final uantities + indicates add'I amt due. - indicates refund for overpayment
s:%works\a=ewWdveways.004 -*
10/2/01
GLADSTONE WEST NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS IMP 00 -05 DRIVEWAY EXTRAS
PIN
Fee Owner or Tax payer
#
Street
Driveway st.
y
� ate Paid /Receip
•
Final Amt
Addit Amt Pd
Parcel Tax Description
162922440019
GREGORY M VOTEL
1730
ATLANTIC ST N
$1,586.84
9/13 /01 14776
LOT 1 BLK 2 TEICH'S FIRST
ADDITION
162922440046
JOHN WILLY
1733
ATLANTIC ST N
$3
9/14/01 14780
LOT 9 BLK 3 GELB'S 2ND
ADDITION
162922440044
STEVEN J YOUNG
1747
ATLANTIC ST N
$330
9/11/01 66086
LOT 7 BLK 3 GELB'S 2ND ADDITION
162922440012
JAMES L SIMPSON
1770
ATLANTIC ST N
$2 ,013 .24
924.5 FT OF E' /z OF SE 1/4 OF SE
1/4 (SUBJ TO ST) IN SEC 16 TN 29
162922440038
TIMOTHY E LITTLE
1791
ATLANTIC ST N
$1,027
LOT 1 BLK 3 GELB'S 2ND
ADDITION
162922440080
WALTER J PETERS
1703
DULUTH ST N
$571
9/13/01 14775
FT OF W 264 FT OF N 106 25/100
FT OF S 27125/100 FT OF SE 1/4
162922440057
KURT A FOSTER
1714
DULUTH ST N
$1,200
LOT 12 BLK 2 GELB'S ADDITION
162922440075
EDWARD L OLSON
1745
DULUTH ST N
$506
117 FT OFW264FTOFSE 1/4 OF
SE 1/4 OF SEC 16 TN 29 RN 22
162922440070
JULIE M GARCIA
1783
DULUTH ST N
$1 ,838.78
LOT 10 BLK 1 GELB'S ADDITION
162922430047
ROLAND C BRANDT LE
1736
EAST SHORE DR N
$969.68
9/11/01 14767*
11 BLK 3 KAVANAGH AND
DAWSONS
162922430069
MIKE GROVER
1758
EDWARD STN
$518
9/14/01 14783
N 20 FT OF LOT 23 &ALL OF LOT
22 BLK 1 KAVANAGH & DAWSONS
162922430005
A E GALBRAITH JR ET AL
1770
EDWARD ST N
$733
9/10/01 14759
LOTS 10 AND LOT 11 BLK 8
LAKESIDE PARK, RAMSEY
162922430006
HOWARD A PETERSON
1774
EDWARD ST N
$1 ,112.08
AND ALL OF LOT 8 BLK 8
LAKESIDE PARK, RAMSEY
162922430011
BRIAN D SONTERRE
1777
EDWARD STN
$695
1/2 OF LOT 18 AND ALL OF LOT 17 BLK 7 LAKESIDE PARK, RAMSEY
162922430072
JIMMY WELTON
1784
EDWARD ST N
$340.43
& ALL OF LOT 6 BLK 8 LAKESIDE
PARK, RAMSEY
162922430010
DONALD JOHNSON
1789
EDWARD ST N
$860
9/10/01 14757
1/2 OF LOT 18 AND ALL OF LOTS
19 AND LOT 20 BLK 7 LAKESIDE
162922430062
KRISTIN JO SMITH
1705
FRANK ST N
$1,270.73
11 BLK 1 KAVANAGH AND
DAWSONS
162922430003
DAVID E NEEDHAM ET AL
1785
FRANK ST N
$410.97
9/12/01 14770
LOTS 16 AND LOT 17 BLK 8
LAKESIDE PARK, RAMSEY
162922410020
LUKMAN A JULMAT
1184
FRISBIE AVE E
$2,926.52
FT OF LOT 20 & ALL OF LOT 19
BLK 1 W. H. FISHER'S ADDIT
162922410019
JAMES C PETERSON
1192
FRISBIE AVE E
$3
LOT 16 BLK 2 . H. FISHER'S
ADDIT
162922410039 I
KIMBERLY ANN RICE
1193
FRISBIE AVE E 1
$2
9/14/01 14779 1
1
1
1/2 OF LOT 23 & ALL OF LOT 24
BLK 2 W. H. FISHER'S ADDIT
PIN
162922410043
Fee Owner or Tax payer
TOU XIONG
#
1225
Street
FRISBIE AVE E
Driveway Est.
$920.34
Date Paid /Receip
9/14/01 14782
Final Amt
Addlt Amt Pd
Parcel Tax Description
LOT 12 BLK 1 PHALEN LAKE
ADDITION
162922410015
WILLIAM B SEILER
1230
FRISBIE AVE E
$1,720.79
LOT 13 BLK 1 PHALEN LAKE
ADDITION
162922410044
SCOTT A KING
1233
FRISBIE AVE E
$1,337.95
9/13/01 14774
LOT 9 BLK 1 PHALEN LAKE
ADDITION
162922410045
N THOMAS SAGISSER
1241
FRISBIE AVE E
$673.62
9/14/01 14781
LOT 3 BLK 1 PHALEN LAKE ADDITION
162922410014
PAULA ERICKSON
1246
FRISBIE AVE E
$869.14
9/13/01 14772
LOTS 20 & LOT 21 BLK 2 W. H.
FISHER'S ADDIT
162922410046
DAVID D BARTOL
1249
FRISBIE AVE E
$1,382.20
LOTS 25 26 AND 3 LOT 27 BLK 1
W. H. FISHER'S ADDIT
162922410007
DONALD F THOMPSON
1254
FRISBIE AVE E
$8,378.66
9/13/01 14773
LOTS 25 26 AND 3 LOT 27 BLK 1
W. H. FISHER'S ADDIT
162922410047
DONNA BIDON
1257
FRISBIE AVE E
$2,041.05
W25 FT LOT 2 & ALL OF LOT 1
BLK 2 W. H. FISHER'S ADDIT
162922410006
ROBERT J SHANLEY
1264
FRISBIE AVE E
$1,017.69
LOT 8 BLK 1 PHALEN LAKE ADDITION
162922410048
FREDERICK O OLAGBAIYE
1265
FRISBIE AVE E
$965.58
LOTS 4, 5 &LOT 6 BLK 2 W. H. FISHER'S ADDIT
LOTS 12 AND LOT 3 BLK 1
KAVANAGH AND DAWSONS
162922430031
C G KETTLESON ET AL
1159
LARPENTEUR AVE E
$756.20
9/10/01 14758
LOT 1 BLK 2 KAVANAGH AND
DAWSONS
162922430040
E M SCHAEFFER ET AL
1744
PHALEN PL N
$3,949.74
9/11/01 14768*
162922440093
HAROLD C SCHNOBRICH
1186
RIPLEY AVE E
$3,363.19
LOT 1 BLK 1 GELB'S ADDITION
162922410035
AMY B BEYER
1255
RIPLEY AVE E
$1,950.00
Total
$58,518.18
* Paid for a joint drivewa
s: \works \assess \alldrivewa s.005
2
a'
AGENDA nIDA
.a,Wl
AGENDA REPORT
,CdO by
CODUC
To: City Manager Richard Fursman
F rom: Da
Chief of Police Donald Win
Subject. Expenditure of 2001 LLEBG Grant Funds En d o rsed _.,..�.
Date. September 27, 2001
Modified ----
R
Introduction -
-The Police Department requests City ouncil approval to expend $18 641 in L Y pp p LEBG
(Local Law Enforcement Block Grant) funds, awarded by the U.S. Department of
Justice for discretionary police equipment purchases.
Background
Pursuant to the LLEBG program administered by the Justice Department, the
Maplewood Police Department has'
as received $16,777 in federal funds to be applied to
the purchase of law enforcement equipment. Conditions of the grant are as follows:
a. The City is required to apply a cash match in the amount of $1 in
order to qualify for the federal funds.
b. Grant funds cannot be used to reduce, supplant, or replace funds
approved in the department's operating budget.
c. Certain federal prohibitions apply with regard to the purchase of vehicles
and intelligence - gathering equipment.
d. Certain mandated advisory oard and public comment requirements rY p q must
be satisfied prior to expenditure of grant funds.
Consistent with the grant guidelines and restrictions, the Police Department proposes to
expend. the bulk of these funds as follows:
a. Purchase of OSHA - approved reflective vests for atrol officer, c ommunit y
Y
service officer, reserve officer, and police explorer use.
b. Purchase of 35mm camera kits for patrol and investigative personnel.
c. Purchase of additional video, audio, and forensic equipment for patrol and
investigation use.
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Authorize the cash match of $1,864 required to receive the federal funds.
2. Authorize the Police Department to expend 2001 LLEBG g rant funds as
proposed above.
3. Provide, with due public notice, an opportunity to receive public comment
concerning the proposed expenditure of these funds during or subsequent
. g q
to its next regularly scheduled public meeting.
Action Requi_ red
Submit to City Council for review and approval.
Is
DSW: js
Agenda � v
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation
DATE: October 1, 2001 for the October 8, 2001 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: . Gladstone Park Development
INTRODUCTION
Action by C
Date
Endorsed
Modified
R*Ckd
Gladstone Park, also known as Arnold Park, was acquired by the city November 20, 1964. The three -acre
park was acquired from the Arnold family on a contract for deed for a purchase price of $8,000.
BACKGROUND
Gladstone Park has had a variety of uses during the past 30 years and was at one time utilized as a
neighborhood park with a small warming house and pleasure skating rink. With the development of
Timber Park at the intersection of Burke Avenue and Atlantic Street, Gladstone Park received less use
due to the busy intersection of English Street. Following its active use as a neighborhood park, the city
used it for approximately ten years as a tree nursery. The site is in a residential neighborhood and
provides a trail access to Weaver Elementary School.
The Parks and Recreation Commission has declared Gladstone Park as excess city property. The Parks
and Recreation Commission recommends that the city develop the site as an eight -lot subdivision with a
cul -de -sac off of English Street. In addition to the proposed development, the trail access to the Bruce
Vento Trail would remain.
Each of the proposed lots would be in conformance with city code and road, sewer and water
improvements would be done as part of the English Street public works project scheduled for 2002.
The timing of this project is critical, as there would be great cost savings to the city for the underground
and road improvements to be completed at the same time as the English Street roadway project.
It is further recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission and staff that the city serve as the
developer of the project, not unlike the project at Sunset Ridge Park. Although no definitive market
research has been done, preliminary estimates indicate that the lots would sell for a minimum of
$50,000 per lot or $400,000 with the monies to be allocated back to the park development fund. This
subject has been discussed at length with public works director Chuck Ahl and he supports and
recommends the proposed improvements.
Staff is looking for conceptual approval of the city developing an eight -lot subdivision and that
Gladstone Park be declared as excess park land.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the public works department to include the eight-lot
Gladstone subdivision as part of the English Street project and refer back specific numbers and final
approval plans for Council approval as part of the English Street redevelopment project.
kftladstonnem
PARK AND PLAYGROUND AC UI IT.ION
NAME OF PARK: ARNOLD (GL-A.D PARK)
DATE ACQUIRED: November 20, 1964
SIZE IN ACRES: 3 Acres
Lot 12, Block 20 (December 1971
LOCATION: Lots 1 -1O,BI k.21. & Lots 13-21 ,Bl k.20, Sabi ns Addition
ng is Burke venue
PREVIOUS OWNER. Arnold. & Arnold
METHOD ACQUIRED: Contract For Deed - $1-600 (11 /.20/64) ; $1-60-0 01/1/65);
(I]/l/66); o .5/
PURCHASE PRICE: $8000-000
* Lot 12, Block 20 purchased December 1971 from Anthony Jungman .
L
I
LU il
NJ
s
E f�4 200 Pr.-
•
.Ri .'S' I a
_. �. »r. . w r �A �^`a .M�� I'•� L L•�"\ I F h j • 1 1 Y ��'• C { I' A ■ �� i'-' F
Agenda
MEMORANDUM Act - ion by Council
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Date
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation Endorsed Modified
DATE: October 1, 2001 for the October 8, 2001 City Council Meeting ReRejected .
SUBJECT: Joy Park Buckthorn Removal /Contingency Funds
During the past week, the city entered into an agreement with the Sentence to Serve program
and Craig Andresen to remove buckthorn at Joy Park. The program has been extremely
successful and we have clear cut approximately four and one -half acres of buckthorn from the
property. I have attached a brochure that was inserted in the Maplewood in Motion and
prepared by the Maplewood Mature Center which outlines the problem of buckthorn.
Buckthorn is a significant community -wide problem and it has completely overgrown Joy Park.
The issue of forestry management and specifically, buckthorn removal, has been raised by a
number of residents at Joy Park. The came about to remove the buckthorn with
the Sentence to Serve program on a limited basis and consequently, we were not able to
receive approval for funding from the City Council prior to the project commencing.
The estimated cost for removal and burning of all the buckthorn at Joy Park is $12,000. Staff
requests a contingency fund transfer to complete this project.
I apologize for requesting contingency funds from the City Council after the fact, but the
opportunity to use the Sentence to Serve program came upon us very quickly and I know this
is a high priority from the City Council.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at ext. 4573.
kdJoypkIrnem
c: Dan Faust, Finance Director
Project Detail
Review this information printed below. Make any needed chang or
updates and return this sheet to:
Joe Hiller, Grants Manager I MN Dept. of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road I St. Paul, M N 55155 -4010
Tel: 651- 296 -4891 1 joe.hiller@dnr.state.mn.us
Grant: CP02 -6.09 $19,400 Maplewood Preserve Prairie Restoration Project
Recipient Maplewood Nature Center
Contact: Virginia Gaynor Tel: (651) 738 -9383
Notes: None
Scope: Restore X acres of dry mesic prairie
Project Components Estimated Cost
Reestablish 15 acre dry-mesic prairie: remove exotics, plant $26,810
Restore 3 small prairie remnants (approx 3 -4 acres) $5,920
Remove invasive trees and shrubs $2
Conduct public education tours, create interpretive website, materials, and $3
Total $38,800
(Conditions: Photographs showing site before, during and after project completion should be provided to the
grantor.
Y
O Z Have you taken any actions requested in the Notes section?
IYJ 0 Does the scope along with its components and costs accurately describe your project?
50" Do you accept the Conditions (if any) ?
Stcky+ pa-'c pvvrd'CA�k L-5 9 10(0101
August 28, 2001
B
U.
Ella
23.1 Acres
Location
The preserve is located in northern Maplewood, just
south of Highway 694, west of McKnight Road between
County Road D and Woodland Avenue. Recommended
parking is on Woodlyn, west of the town homes.
Site Description
Prior to European settlement this site was dominated by
an oak savanna plant community which was characterized
by scattered trees and groves of oaks (primarily bur oak),
often in scrubby form and. with brushy thickets. Between
groves of oaks and colonies of shrubs, prairie grasses and
wildflowers covered the open meadows. Since
settlement, the land has been used for agriculture, and its
primary use appears to have been for pasture.
Today, the site is located very near Highway 694 and is
bisected by a utility corridor. The site of an old farmstead
can be found on the north end of the site. Here the
Bruentrup heritage farm has been moved. The site
appears to have been disturbed in a variety of ways, and is
now dominated by invasive herbaceous plants and fast
growing, xAreedy trees.
Unique Features
Rolling topography and the old farmstead make this site
unique.
BARR Fall 1999
Neighborhood Context
The preserve is located in a residential neighborhood of
single and multi -unit homes. With Highway 694 just 1/8
mile away, highway noise can be very loud on some days.
The northern boundary is delineated by County Road D
on the west and abuts private homes with lawns on the
east. The Bruentrup Historical Farm has been given 2.21
acres of the preserve along this northern border and can
be accessed from County Road D. McKnight Road forms
some of the eastern boundary, with yards adjacent to the
rest. There are multi -unit homes along the southern
boundary and adjacent vegetation is a mostly turf grass
and gardens. A part of the southern edge of the preserve
borders Woodlyn Avenue and an extra wide turf strip is
maintained along the road here. The western boundary is
shared with an undeveloped lot containing pasture grasses
and with one home. The border between the home and
the preserve has been planted with conifers.
Boundary Encroachment
Boundary encroachment is occurring on this site and
should be addressed. Some homeowners are mowing into
the preserve and dumping grass clippings and brush.
Soils
The soils of the site are composed of sandy loams. They
are well - drained, with moderate organic matter and sloAA'
permeability. The surface is silty in some areas. Most of
the topsoil has eroded from the site.
Threats & Negative Impacts
This site is very degraded. The light soils are
considerably eroded and are of poor quality, invasive
plant species dominate the site, and a utility corridor
bisects the site. Noise from Highway 694 is quite
audible.
A construction debris dump of considerable size exists
south of the old farmstead. Here also exists a barbed wire
fence that should be removed along with the construction
debris. Another negative impact is the use of herbicides
under the electrical high- lines, used to kill woody
vegetation. This will continue unless the utility company
i:. requested to do otherwise.
VUUDLYN & D
:;City of Maplewood, MN
Herbicide use under utility line.
Preliminary Plant List
Quality of Plant Communities
Over all, the plant communities of the site are very
degraded, with a variety of invasive plant species
dominating the site. The native plants that once grew on
the site are mostly gone, although dry prairie grasses and
wildflowers can be found on the sandy, well - drained soils
of the .site. A small grove of oak trees also exists on site:
Most of the tree species, however, are undesirable. These
include boxelder and Siberian elm.
8 ,�R Fall 1999
Vegetation on site is
grove present.
degraded, however, there is a small oak
Trends in Savanna Degradation
ORIGINAL SAVANNA SUCCEEDS BUCKTHORN DEGRADED
SAVANNA TO FOREST VATH INVASION FOREST
FIRE SUPiESSION
al, &A & i
Bird 2 I"sI)
Richness - 22
3 00+ ` -- — 15± (n =2) d± (n -5)
Vegetation
Richness
'50
- -- <2s
--
Source: Steven Apfelbaum
If the site were left unmanaged the landscape iaould not natu
evolve into native plant habitats. Rather, if .buckthorn went
uncontrolled, it would reproduce to create an impenetrable thicket.
Over time, all native plants would be shaded out, soil vi ould erode,
and the roots of the remaining canopy trees would become exposed
and begin to topple. There would be few butterflies, birds, or
anything else, other than perhaps some roving gangs of starlings
feeding on box elder .hugs. All the while, water soil, and other
resources would run downhill, polluting lakes and rivers.
Common Name
Botanic Name
Native Herbaceous Species
Aster _
Aster spp.
Bird's foot violet
Viola pedata
Black - eyed Susan
Rudbeckia hirta
Bush clover
Lespedeza capitata
Flowering spurge
Euphorbia corollata
Grey goldenrod
Solidago nemoralis
Hairy grama
Bouteloua hirsuta
Indian grass
Sorghastrum nutans
Little bluestem
Schizachyrium scoparium
Pussy toes
Antennaria neglecta
Showy goldenrod
Sideoats grama
Solidago speciosa
Stiff goldenrod
Bouteloua curtipendula
Solidago rigida
Stinging nettle
Urtica dioica
veiny pea
Lathyrus venosus
Wild rose
Rosa spp.
Non - Native Herbaceous Sp ecies
Alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Bird's foot trefoil
Lotus corniculatus
Bouncing -Bet
Saponaria ofcinalis
Burdock
Arctium tomentosum
Canada thistle
Circium canadensis
Creeping Charlie
Glechoma hederacea
Daylily
Hemerocalis spp.
Red clover
Trifolium pratense
Reed canary grass
Phalaris arundinacea
Smooth brome
Bromus inermis
Spotted knapweed
Centaurea maculosa
Tall bearded iris
Iris spp.
Yarrow
Achillia millefolium
Native Woody Sp ecies
Aspen
Populus tremuloides
Boxelder
Acer negundo
Bur oak
Quercus macrocarpa
Grey dogwood
Corpus racemosa
Northern pin oak
Quercus elipsoidalis
Red cedar
Juniperus virginiana
Red oak
Quercus rubrum
Redtwig dogwood
Corpus stolonifera
Riverbank grape
Vitis riparia
Wild raspberry
Rubus spp.
Woodbine
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Non - Native Woody Species
Amur maple
Acerginnala
Apple
Malus spp.
Common buckthorn
Rhamnus cathartica
Glossy buckthorn
Rhamnus frangula
Lilac
Syringa spp.
Russian olive
Eleagnus angustifolia
Siberian elm
Ulmus pumila
Tartarian honeysuckle
Lonicera tartarica
PTRI
ar iviapiewooci, MN
L&ONCE LANDSCAPE DESIGN
Plant Community Restoration
The most logical restoration of the site would be to
recreate prairie. Invasive trees and herbaceous plants
should be removed from the site to properly establish
prairie grasses and wildflowers. Because of the
degradation of the plant community by invasive plants,
extensive measures would be required to establish prairie.
Maintenance of the established prairie would involve
regular burning and spraying to control invasive plants.
Neighbors have reported shikes, meadowlarks, and
songbirds at this preserve. If prairie restoration is
undertaken, consideration should be given to retaining
some areas of shrub for songbirds.
Human Use
A simple loop trail for hiking could be mowed through
the site, whether the plant communities are left as they are
or prairie is restored. Parking could be accommodated on
Woodlyn Avenue.
Interim Site Management
Initiate buckthorn removal plan by first
removing all fruiting buckthorn, then
systematically working across the site.
Initiate deer management program.
Remove garbage dump.
Begin program to eradicate bird's foot trefoil.
Siberian elm and boxelder in afield ofsmooth brome on the eastern
end of the site.
Restoring native plant communities to this site would be
an ambitious undertaking. If restoration is not W 0 0 D L Y N & D
jA.R-R Fall 1 999 undertaken this may _
be a site where more active 3 of 3
recreation could be permitted.
P�tiOF MIN
I yF
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
o N
M w
-v v
p 500 Laftit j ette Rural 10
St. l',cul. Minnesota 55155 -40
�� NATIlRa� _
August 27, 2001
Ms. Virginia Gaynor , Naturalist
Maplewood Nature Center
2659 E. 7th St. Maplewood, MN 55119
Re: Grant #CP02 -6.09 - Maplewood Preserve Prairie Restoration Project
Dear Ms. Gaynor:
Your organization has been awarded the partnership grant shown above. The next step is to
review the enclosed Pr oiect Detail sheet, make any needed changes, then send the revised
sheet to me. I will have a grant agreement containing this information prepared and sent to you
for signature.
Please do not begin your project until the grant agreement is signed. Any expenses incurred or
labor performed before a start state is given are not eligible for reimbursement under your grant.
If you must begin your project soon, please call me and we will try to make arrangements to
accelerate your starting date.
Please review the other enclosed forms now so you will know what types of information you will
need to keep for your reimbursement requests and your final report. You will see my name listed
at the field contact for this grant. 1 am just filling in for now. Later, we will assign a new contact
who will review your payment requests and conduct a final inspection of your work.
Sincerely,
15' 1oe Hiller, Grant Manger
(651) 296 -4891
Enclosu res
Project Detail Sheet - to be completed and returned as soon as possible
Claiming Reimbursements - instruction sheet
Financial Manual - contains forms for reporting your expenses
Final Performance Report - to be completed when your project is done.
DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1 - 888 - 646 -6367 • TTY: 651 -296 -5484 • 1- 800 -657 -3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
Who Values Diversity too Minimum of 10% Post -Con' Sumer Waste