Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 03-31 City Council PacketCouncil /Manager's Workshop 6: 00 p. m. AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M.. Monday, March 31, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 03 -06 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the March 10, 2003 Council /Manager's Workshop. 2. Minutes from the March 10, 2003 City Council Meeting, Meeting No. 03-05 E: APPROVAL OF AGENDA F4'' APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary - Temporary Gambling, Temporary 3.2 Beer and Carnival License for Annual Fall Festival 3. Vietnam Restaurant -3035 White Bear Avenue -3.2 Malt Liquor License 4. Final Plat- Beaver Lake Townhomes Second Addition (Sterling Street North) 5. Final Plat -Towns of New Century Third Addition (New Century Boulevard and Highwood Avenue) 6. Conditional Use Permit Review - Choice Auto Rental (2923 Highway. 61) 7. Conditional. Use Permit Review - Maplewood Toyota. (2873. Maplewood Drive) 8. Conditional Use Permit Review -St. Jerome's Church (380 Roselawn Avenue) 9. Conditional Use Permit Review- Hillcrest Animal Hospital (1320 County Road D) 10. Conditional Use Permit Review - Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall (925 Century Avenue) 11. Resolution of Support-CDBG Funds for Beaver Creek Carriage Homes (Ferndale Street) 12. Retiree Health Savings Plan Revision 13. Maplewood 2003, Shape Up Challenge 14. Public Safety Dispatching Center - Equipment Upgrade Purchase 15, Oakdale Sewage Agreement 16. Dial Tone Agreement Renewal 17. English Street Roundabout Landscape Improvements, Project 01 -14- Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids 18. Markham Pond Outlet and Utility Improvements, Project 02- 02- Resolution Acceptance of Project 19. Hazelwood Street Improvements (Phase 1- County Road C to Beam Ave), Project 01 -16- Resolution Receiving Feasibility Study and Ordering Public Hearing. 20. Municipal State Aid Advance — Resolution for Advance of State Aid Funds H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. Schmelz Countryside VW /Saab Expansion (1180 Highway 36) Parking Lot Setback Variance Resolution — Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Expansion of Motor Vehicle Repair Facility- Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Expansion of Motor Vehicle Sales Lot 2. 7:10 p.m. Larpenteur Avenue Redevelopment Site "(City of Maplewood) Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to R -3 (N)) (4 Votes) - Zoning Map Change (R I to R -3) 3. 7:15 p.m. Legacy Village of Maplewood, City Project 02 -18- Resolution Approving, AUAR and Authorizing Final Distribution 4. 7:20 p.m. County Road D Realignment, City Project 02 -07 and 02 -08 — Resolution, Receiving Comments and Responses on EAW and Finding of No Significant Impact I. AWARD OF BIDS J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS K. . NEW BUSINESS 1. Champps of Maplewood -One Time Event 2. Atlantic Street Water Main Extension North of Frost, Project 03-16 — Receive Petition and Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. 3. Carver Avenue Trunk Sewer Main Improvements, Project 03 -17 - Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study. 4.. Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, Project 02 -14 a. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids b. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll c. Resolution Ordering Assessment Hearing d. Approve Joint Powers Agreement with St. Paul . 5 . Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10 a. Resolution Approving Plans and Approve Ad for Bids b. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 6. Maplewood Dr. /Keller Pkwy. Street Improvements, Pro ect 03 -02 a. Resolution Approving Plans and Approve Ad for Bids b. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 7. Support of Local Sales Tax Resolution 8. 2003 Budget Changes for State Aid Reductions L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS A COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. City Council/Planning Commission Joint Meeting-April 7-Maplewood Room -6:00 p.m. O. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at. least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are, also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language. AGENDA ITEM No �__ ......... MINUTES CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WO�HOP Monday, March 10, 2003 Council Chambers, City Hall 5:30 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL ion byco r -. Modified R Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present (Arrived @ 6:00 p.m.) Others Present: City Manager Fursman Assistant City Manager Coleman City Clerk Guilfoile Assistant Community Development Director Ekstrand Assistant City Engineer Cavett Assistant Finance Director Bauman C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Legacy Village Preliminary Plan Review with Hartford Group (County Road D) a. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented the report and introduced the Hartford- Group Members. b. Bill Griffith, legal staff for the Hartford Group, presented the concept plan for the Hajicek property. C. Patrick Sarver, representing the Hartford Group, addressed vegetation and the wetlands. d. Elizabeth Kautz, Vice President of the Hartford Group, discussed affordable housing. e. Greg Juenemann, 721 Mt. Vernon Avenue, expressed concerns regarding the wetland buffer zone. Council/Manager's Workshop 03 -10 -03 2. Human Relations Commission Appointment (Two Vacancies) a. Mayor Cardinal welcomed the applicant: Carol Watnemo, 1777 Phalen Place, Maplewood The second applicant, Annastacia Belladonna, 2443 Larpenteur Avenue East, #317, Maplewood, was not present. The Human Relations appointment will be made at the following City Council Meeting. E. FUTURE TOPICS 1. Exploring the Possibilities of a Sister City 2. Sidewalk Study - Overall City Plan 3. Street Scape Plan F. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:37 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All Council./Manager's Workshop 03 -10 -03 AGENDA ITEM N04om A. B. Co III E. DRAFT--MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 10, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 03 -05 CALL TO ORDER: Action by Council 1 Date __ i"' Rejected A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the Council/Manager Workshop February 24, 2003 Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the Council/Manager Workshop Minutes of February 24, 2003 as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins, Wasiluk and Juenemann Abstain - Councilmember Koppen 2. Minutes from City Council Meeting, February 24, 2003 Meeting No. 03 -04 Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the City Council Minutes of meeting of February 24, 2003 as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins, Wasiluk and Juenemann Abstain - Councilmember Koppen APPROVAL OF AGENDA G7. Stricken Fl. Human Relations Commission Applicants F2. Recognize Mr. Hockey N1. Recognize Sponsor for Fire Department N2. March 24 City Council Meeting Changed to March 31 Ml. Joint Meeting with Council and Planning Commission Citv Council Meetinar 03 -10 -03 M2. Partnership M3. NEST M4. Update on Joint Meeting for Cities and School Districts Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Appointment to Human Relations Commission Councilmember Koppen moved to appoint Carol Watnemo to the Human Relations Committee. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 2. Mayor Cardinal congratulated Nate Dey, a North High School Senior and Maplewood resident for receiving the Mr. Hockey award as the best high school hockey player in Minnesota for 2002. G. CONSENT AGENDA City Manager Fursman clarified consent agenda items 2 and 6. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS Tl AXTATIT T $518,851.02 Checks #60139 thru #60148 dated 2/2 thru $ 109,618.92 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 2/6 thru 2/13/03 $11,901,979.84 Total Accounts Payable Tl A T 771 !1 T T Citv Council Meeting 03 -10 -03 2 2/5/03 $74,801.97 Checks #60149 thru #60187 dated 2/7 thru 2/11/03 $10,761,696.51 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 1/31 thru 2/5/03 $83.24 Checks #60188 thru #60189 dated 2/10 thru 2/11/03 $436,928.18 Checks #60190 thru #60254 dated 2/18/03 $ 109,618.92 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 2/6 thru 2/13/03 $11,901,979.84 Total Accounts Payable Tl A T 771 !1 T T Citv Council Meeting 03 -10 -03 2 $113,946.00 Payroll (Merit Pay) Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2/7/03 $415,154.73 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2/14/03 $2605.04 Payroll Deduction checks #92590 thru #92597 dated 2/14/03 $555,995.77 Total Payroll $12,457,975.61 GRAND TOTAL 2. Paramedic Call Pay for Paid - Per -Call Firefighters Approved a new rate of $25.00 per call for paid - per -call firefighters, who are certified paramedics, when assigned as a paramedic. 3. Approve Sewer Televising Contract Authorized to enter into a contract with Pipe Services Corporation for the annual sewer - televising project. 4. Approve Replacement Purchase of Two Staff Cars - Public Works Authorized to enter in to a contract with Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet, under State Contract 430025, for the purchase of two (2) Chevrolet Malibu four -door sedans and authorized the disposal of two (2) 1995 Ford Taurus vehicles at state auction. 5. Approved the following three (3) resolutions: 1) Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Consolidation with Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District; 2) Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement Dissolution; and 3) Approving Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Boundary Change RESOLUTION NO, 03-03-028 EAST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION CONSOLIDATION WITH RAMSEY WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHED DISTRICT Resolution by the City of Maplewood concurring with the petition to add or transfer territory to the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District. RECITALS: 1. That the City of Maplewood has jurisdiction over the territory of the East Mississippi Water Management Organization (East Mississippi WMO) 2. That the East Mississippi WMO has not adopted a water management plan as required by statute. 3. That the territory of the East Mississippi WMO is not large enough to exist as its own watershed district. Citv Council Meeting 03-10-03 3 4. That to allow for the most efficient use of resources and accomplish the statutory purposes for which the East Mississippi WMO was created, the territory of the East Mississippi WMO should be added to the existing Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District. 5. That the Boundary Change Petition prepared by the South Washington Watershed District has been reviewed by the City Council, and subject to the terms and conditions of paragraph 7 of said Petition, the City of Maplewood concurs with said Petition. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Maplewood is in concurrence with the Boundary Change Petition of the South Washington Watershed District to be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources. RESOLUTION NO. 03-03-029 EAST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT DISSOLUTION Resolution by the City of Maplewood to terminate the Joint Powers Agreement of a St. Paul Park, Maplewood, Newport, Woodbury, Cottage Grove and Grey Cloud Island Township Water Management Organization. Resolution by the City of Maplewood to terminate the East Mississippi Water Management Organization. RECITALS: 1. That the City of Maplewood entered into a Joint Powers Agreement between the cities of St. Paul Park, Maplewood, Newport, Woodbury, Cottage Grove and Grey Cloud Island Township, Minnesota to establish a water management organization. 2. That the Joint Powers Agreement was adopted by all of the affected units of government pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.59. 3. That the affected units of government have determined that the continuation of the Joint Powers Agreement is unnecessary, and that simultaneous with the adoption of this Resolution, a separate Resolution is being adopted to add or transfer territory covered by the Joint Powers Agreement to an existing watershed district. 4. That Section VII of the Joint Powers Agreement allows for immediate dissolution of the Joint Powers Agreement upon unanimous agreement of all parties. 5. That all parties have agreed to dissolve the Joint Powers Agreement and the commission created there under. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD that the Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment of a St. Paul Park, Maplewood, Newport, Woodbury, Cottage Grove and Grey Cloud Island Township Water Management Organization, commonly referred to as the East Mississippi WMO, shall be dissolved. Citv Council Meeting 03-10-03 RESOLUTION NO. 03 -03 -030 RAMSEY WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHED DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE Resolution by the City of Maplewood concurring with the petition to add or transfer territory to the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District. RECITALS: 1. The City of Maplewood has jurisdiction over the territory identified to be added or transferred from one WMO to another WMO. 2. That the territory drains to the abutting district and is more appropriately included within the abutting watershed districts /water management organization. 3. That the territory changes are technical in nature, and are the result of study and review conducted by the district since its creation. 4. That the Boundary Change Petition prepared by the South Washington Watershed District has bec reviewed by the City Council and the City of Maplewood concurs with said petition. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Maplewood is in concurrence with the Boundary Change Petition of the South Washington Watershed District to be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources. 6. Accept LEAP Award (Landscape Ecology Award Program) presented to the City of Maplewood by the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Natural Resources Board Accepted the LEAP award and a $25.00 gift certificate to be utilized at the Maplewood Nature Center. ANN, IN III k .. & . I A . . r . Valft 4! V - • H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m Maplewood Drive /Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03 -02 Resolution Ordering Improvement following the Public Hearing a. . City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Cavett presented specifics from the report. C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Bruce Shaw, 1122 County Road C, Maplewood Jim Faulconbridge, 2400 Keller Parkway, Maplewood Citv Council MeetinLy 03-10-03 5 Bruce Shaw - Second Appearance d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Ko p pen moved to adopt the following resolution ordering the improvement of the Maplewood Drive West /Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03-0 RESOLUTION 03 -03 -031 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted December 23, 2002, a report has been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the p . resurfacing of Maplewood Drive West /Keller Parkway, City Project 03-02, and this report was received by the council on February 24, 2003, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $444,850. 2. A p ublic hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 10th day of March 2003 in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 2. 7:15 p.m Sibley Cove Apartment Building (County Road D) Land use Plan Change (BC to R -3 (H)) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Associate Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report. C. Commissioner Monahan -Junek presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: David Steele, the applicant, provided further specifics on the project Patrick Flaherty, Manager of Birch Glen Apartments, 3100 Aerial Street, Maplewood Bob Larson, Owner, Maplewood Auto Mall, Maplewood Keith Larson, Tenant, Maplewood Auto Mall, Maplewood Myron Haynes, Business Owner, Plaza 3000, Maplewood Bob Bankers, Owner of Birch Glen Apartments, Maplewood Citv Council Meetine 03-10-03 Howard Nelson, 2175 E. County Road D, Maplewood Sally Renish, Manager of Emerald Inn, 2025 County Road D, Maplewood Dave Hubl, 2191 County Road D, Maplewood David Steele, Second Appearance Patrick Flaherty, Second Appearance Keith Larson, Second Appearance Bob Bankers, Second Appearance Bob Larson, Second Appearance f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution approving the land use plan change from BC (business commercial) to R -3 (H) (residential high density). This is for the 7.1- acre site of the Sibley Cove housing development. (4 Votes required): LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, David Steele, representing MWF Properties, applied for a change to the city's land use plan from BC (business commercial) to R -3(H) (residential high density). WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located on the south side of County Road D, west of Ariel Street and east of White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On February 19, 2003, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan amendments. 2. On March 10, 2003, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described changes for the following reasons: 1. This site is proper for and consistent with the city's goals, objectives and policies for high- density residential land use in the comprehensive plan. This includes: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. b. Being near a collector street, being between two arterial streets and is near open space and shopping and services. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The on -site pond and large setback from Woodlynn Avenue will separate the apartment building from the properties to the south. Citv Council MeetinEr 03 -10 -03 b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The existing street pattern keeps the apartment traffic separate from the existing single dwellings and other residences. c. There should be less traffic from this development than from a commercial development on the same site. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes - Councilmembers Wasiluk, Collins, and Juenemann Nays -Mayor Cardinal and Councilmember Koppen Motion failed. The motion failed based on the following findings: 1. The land use designation (BC) has been established and Petitioner did not present reasonable and sufficient evidence to change the land use to HR (residential high density); 2. The roposed land use change by the Petitioner was inconsistent with adjoining p business commercial uses on three sides of the property based on testimony of adjoining property owners; 3. The City's current land use of the Petitioner's site (BC) is consistent with the City's goals, objectives and policies for the area. The Petitioner failed to present evidence that the site is proper and consistent with the City's goals, objectives and policies for a land use changed to residential high density. The Petitioner failed to present evidence that the proposed use to residential high density is a good transition use between existing commercial uses and residential uses based on health, safety and welfare; 4. There was testimony presented and introduced that the driveways of the commercial uses would present. a health, safety and welfare issue if the subject property is changed to a residential high density. More study is needed. 5. Testimony was presented by adjacent commercial users that the use is inconsistent and the use of residential is inconsistent with adjoining commercial uses as an example: a. Commercial lighting; b. Commercial hours of operation; C. Volumes of traffic in the adj acent commercial uses; City Council Meeting 03 -10 -03 6. Testimony stated there was an error in notification to nearby property owners; 7. Testimony stated that as part of the process there was not a timely submission of the design review plan for the council. In fact, the Design Review Board had not approved of the design, from a procedural point, and the Council received changes in the design that needed further analysis by the City Council. The design change would serve as a indicator for the type of high residential use and the impact of adjoining property owners. The design plan did not offer evidence, at the time because of lack of analysis that the change in land use plan would not be incompatible with surrounding properties. The design plan would only offer additional evidence for the high residential use. The Petitioner failed to have that information in a timely manner before the Council; 8. That there is a need to protect neighbors and landowners from intrusion and encroachment by a change of the adjoining use; there is a need for adequate buffers and separation between commercial uses and high residential uses. There is a need for more information whether or not the developer can satisfy and minimize the proposed conflict in land uses; the Petitioner failed to meet its burden to present evidence to minimize the proposed conflict in land uses. 9. There is a need for the Petitioner to present more information with respect to ingress and egress to the proposed Petitioner's parking lot and conflict with commercial parking. The Petitioner failed to meet its burden in presenting evidence of the conflict of its use with the commercial activity; 10. Testimony of adjoining property users stated that deviations from the land use would constitute a threat to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owner or occupants of nearby land. There needs to be more information submitted by the developer and that the uses would not threaten the property values, safety, health or welfare of adjoining property owners. The Petitioner failed to meet its burden that the uses would not threaten the property values, safety, health or welfare of adjoining property owners 1 1. Developer must present more evidence to prove or minimize the conflict between commercial and high density uses. A five- minute recess was taken. 3. 7:30 p.m Saint Paul Soccer Center (County Road B) Land Use Plan Change (OS (open space) to P (park)) Conditional Use Permit a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant Community Development Director Ekstrand presented specifics from the report. C. Parks and Recreation Director Anderson provided further specifics. d. Commissioner Monahan -Junek provided the Planning Commission Report. °e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Citv Council 03 -24 -03 Bob Biershied, St. Paul Parks and Recreation Greg Mack, Ramsey County Lois Hollenkamp, 1984 Adolphus, Maplewood Ruth Brandt, 2000 Adolphus, Maplewood Paul Allen, 131 Downs Avenue, Maplewood Councilmember Collins moved to continue the meeting until completion. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Nancy Plumbo, 176 E. Skillman, Maplewood Susan Halverson, 170 E. Skillman, Maplewood JoAnn Ronning, 144 E. Skillman, Maplewood Duane Rortvedt, 144 Mount Vernon, Maplewood Highland Recreation Association, 2023 Beard Avenue, St. Paul Chris Nelson, 1244 Highridge Court, Maplewood Pete Frank, 1921 Price Avenue, Maplewood Sean Nicholson, 2381 Chippewa Circle, Maplewood Rob McHatie, 1412 Almond Avenue, Maplewood Sharell Babin, 150 E. County Road B., Maplewood Dan Odegaard, Administrative Director of the Waldorf School Charles Lin, 1991 Adolphus Street, Maplewood Gregory Cottle, 395 E. Horseshoe Drive, Shoreview, President of NW Soccer Association Dr. Urule Igavboa, 752122 nd Street, Oakdale John Hackman, 2011 Jackson Street, Maplewood Sharell Babin- Second Appearance Tom Peck- Second Appearance f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a comprehensive land use plan amendment from OS (open space) to P (park) for the City of St. Paul's proposed Sandy Lake Soccer Complex: RESOLUTION NO. 03-03-032 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of St. Paul is proposing a change to the city's land use plan from OS (open space) to P (park). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located on the south side of County Road B East west of Interstate 35E in Section 18, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On February 19, 2003, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council not approve the plan Citv Council 03 -24 -03 10 amendment. 2. On March 10, 2003, the city council discussed the proposed land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. The proposed soccer complex would meet Maplewood's mission to provide a comprehensive, balanced and sustainable system of parks, open spaces /natural areas, trails and leisure - oriented activities /programs for city residents to use and enjoy in as cost - effective manner as possible. 2. It would provide city residents with parks and natural areas for recreational uses as visual /physical diversions from the hard surfacing of urban development and as a means to maintain the character, ambience, appearance and history of the community. 3. It would maximize the recreational opportunities available to city residents through the development of fair and equitable working partnerships between the city and the local school district, adjacent cities, county, churches and civic organizations. 4. It would provide city residents with an interconnected trail system for transportation and recreation purposes and as a means to tie divergent parks and open space with the broader community. 5. It would convert an unattractive and unusable lime pit to an attractive and useable park. 6. It would provide relief for existing soccer fields that are heavily used. 7. It would create and foster a cooperative working relationship with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County. 8. It would serve as a regional recreational facility. This is advantageous since recreation does not follow town borders. Approval is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed soccer complex would conform with Maplewood's mission to provide a comprehensive, balanced and sustainable system of parks, open spaces /natural areas, trails and leisure - oriented activities /programs for city residents to use and enjoy in as cost - effective manner as possible. 2. It would provide city residents with parks and natural areas for recreational uses as visual /physical diversions from the hard surfacing of urban development and as a means to maintain the character, ambience, appearance and a sense of open space. 3. It would maximize the recreational opportunities available to city residents through the development of fair and equitable working partnerships between the city and the local school district, adjacent cities, county, _churches and civic organizations. 4. It would provide city residents with an interconnected trail system for transportation and Citv Council 03 -24 -03 11 recreation purposes and as a means to tie divergent parks and open space to the broader community. 5. It would convert an unattractive and unusable lime pit to an attractive and usable park. 6. It would provide relief for existing area soccer fields that are heavily used. 7. It would create and foster a cooperative working relationship with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County. 8. It would serve as a regional recreational facility that would serve many communities. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit for the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex. Conditions include: the wetland issue needs to be addressed, no lights on the field, no trails, walkway or paths to the neighborhood, and an 8' or higher fence must be installed. Approval is based on the f ollowing findings required by RESOLUTION NO. 03 -03 -033 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of St. Paul applied for a conditional use permit to construct the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex. WHEREAS, Section 36 -52(4) of the city code requires a conditional use permit for any public service or public building use. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located on the south side of County Road B East on the west of Interstate 35E. The legal description is: Parcel #18- 29 -22 -12 -0010: South 140" of North 270' of E 442 68/100'. North 130' of SW 1 /4 of NE 1 /4 subject to County Road B part of NW 1 /4 of NE 1 /4 S.E.LY of 160' W.W. R/W in SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. Parcel #18-29-22-24-0024: Subject to Avenue; except South 15' of East 320' of West 1790' of NW 1 /4 ex. Part in James 1 St Addition part of said NW 1 /4, S.E.LY of W.W. R/W in SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. Parcel #18- 29 -22 -24 -0001: SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. 100' W.W. R/W across N 2/3 of SW 1 /4. 165' W.W. R/W across S 1 /4 of NW 1 /4. 160' W.W. R/W across N 3 /4 of E 1 /2 of NW 1 /4 of SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. Parcel #18-29-22-12-0009: SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. 160' W. W R/W across NW 1 /4 of NE 1 /4 of SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 19, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. Citv Council 03 -24 -03 12 2. On March 10, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed site plan shall be submitted to the city for approval. All construction shall follow the approved site plan. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within two years of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. 3. The city council shall review this permit in two years. If the applicant has not substantially started this project by that time, the city council may consider renewing this permit. 4. The applicant shall submit detailed plans that include, but are not limited to, the following: Citv Council 03-24-03 13 • A detailed landscape and tree - buffer plan with quantities, sizes, species and locations. • A detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plan. • Storm water run -off calculations. • A site plan that provides setback dimensions, the location of trails, parking lot dimensions and the location of any fences (including material, height and color). • A right -turn lane into the proposed site from County Road B. • An area for "proof -of- parking" should the proposed 235 spaces be insufficient. • "No parking" signs along the main driveway. • A neighborhood park element with features like a picnic area, tot lot, swing sets, etc. • A paved bike path around the perimeter of the site. • The driveway entrance widened to 26 -32 feet. • A gate at the driveway entrance. 5. Site lighting shall not be allowed for night play. Staff may approve security lighting if it is found to be needed by the police chief for security reasons. 6. Park maintenance shall be provided by the City of St. Paul. 7. Tournaments and scheduled events shall not bring in outside vendors or merchandise without a permit from the city clerk. In certain situations, the city manager may require city council review and approval. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for locking the gate each evening. 9. The applicant shall also submit a program identifying the hours of use, the teams or groups using this facility and their ages. They shall also submit the management plan for the facility as well as a plan for enforcement should there be any problems. 10. The City of Maplewood may require that the City of St. Paul provide additional police staffing and security at any events at the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All A short break was taken. I. AWARD OF BIDS J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Legacy Village of Maplewood, City Project 02 -18: Resolution Receiving Responses to Comments on Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and Calling a Public Hearing a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Cavett presented specifics from the report. Citv Council 03 -24 -03 14 Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution that receives the comments and responses for the AUAR for the Legacy Village at Maplewood and called a public hearing for March 31, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of adopting the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan: RESOLUTION NO. 03-03-034 A RESOLUTION TO RECEIVE COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON AN ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) FOR THE LEGACY VILLAGE AT MAPLEWOOD IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING WHICH PURPOSE SHALL BE TO ADOPT THE FINAL AUAR AND MITIGATION PLAN. WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 provides for a substitute form of Environmental Review known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process; and WHEREAS, an AUAR process allows for the environmental review of development and associated infrastructure in a particular geographic area within a jurisdiction if the local governmental unit has an adopted comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2002, the Maplewood City Council authorized preparation of an AUAR for the Legacy Village at Maplewood project; and WHEREAS, the firm of SRF Consulting Group, Inc. has prepared a draft AUAR for the developer of Legacy Village at Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the City is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 Subp. l; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the draft AUAR and found it to be in acceptable order designating the impacts of the proposed development and authorized the release of the AUAR on December 23, 2002, to receive all comments and reviews related to the environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the City allowed the required minimum 30 -day comment period for the AUAR; and WHEREAS, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. has prepared responses to the comments received; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood desires to receive public testimony on the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan before considering adoption of same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the City Council hereby: 1. Receives all comments and responses to the draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review. 2. Calls a public hearing for 7:00 pm on March 31, 2003, for the purpose of receiving public testimony on the AUAR and for the purpose of considering adopting the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All ON Council 03 -24 -03 15 L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Patty Geheren, 2575 Carver, Maplewood Wanted to thank the fire department for saving her life. There is also a pile of dirt in her yard that the city needs to address. M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Joint Meeting Councilmember Juenemann requested a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission to encourage inner cooperation and to discuss common goals. 2. Partnership Councilmember Wasiluk invited the public to The People's Fair 2003 to celebrate diversity, Saturday, March 15, 11:00 a.m. at North High School. 3. NEST- Councilmember Koppen would like to see NEST promoted in every Maplewood in Motion. 4. Joint Meeting with School Districts and Cities City Manager Fursman clarified with the Mayor that this meeting should be arranged with all school districts and cities collectively. 5. Met Council Blueprint 2030 Councilmember Collins noted that the blueprint may be retracted or revised. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Fire Department Sponsors Chief Lukin thanked the ladies of St. Jerome's Church for the care blankets they donated for children. 2. March 24 City Council Meeting Councilmember Wasiluk moved to change the March 24 City Council Meeting and Council /Manager's workshop to March 31 St . Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All O. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Cardinal moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:53 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes - All Citv Council 03 -24 -03 16 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council ^ TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director Date RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Mo if DATE: March 25 2003 Rejected Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS T)ATTADT - 0 $62,527.79 Checks #60365 thru #60406 dated 3/7 thru 3/11/03 $219,961.71 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 3/3 thru 3/6/03 $455.00 Checks #60407 dated 3/11/03 $402.,767.98 Checks #60408 thru #60471 dated 3/18/03 $120,143.62 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 3/7 thru 3/13/03 $70.00 Checks #60472 dated 3/14/03 $239,379.07 Checks #60473 thru #60524 dated 3/25/03 $227,749.51 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 3/14 thru 3/20/03 $1,273,,054.68 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $403,614.17 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 3/14/03 $26,,066.87 Payroll Deduction checks #92941 thru #92948 dated 3/14/03 $429,681.04 Total Payroll $1,702,735.72 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu attachments PARNANCEMORMAGMApC1Ar 032403.doc 1 vdhlist Check Register :Page: 1 03/07/2003 10:52:55AM 'City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor 60365 3/11/2003 01047 3M 60366 3/11/2003 .00064 60367 3/11/2003 00110 60368 3/11/2003 00111 60369 3/11/2003 02748 60370 3/11/2003 02750 60371 3/11/2003 00384 60372 3/11/2003 00358 ALDRIDGE, MARK ANDREWS, SCOTT ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC BEAVER, ELIZABETH DAWSON, RICHARD DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS DGM INC. 60373 3/11/2003 -00463 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. 60374 3/11/2003 02567 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 60375 3/11/2003 00509 `FIRE MARSHAL ASSN OF MN 60376 3/11/2003 02071 FISHER, DAVID 60377 3/11/2003 00536 FRASER, JOHN 60378 3/11/2003 00547 G.L. BERG & ASSOCIATES ENT 60379 3/11/2003 00652 HEINZ, STEVE 60380 3/11/2003 00719 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622 60381 3/11/2003 00858 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA 60382 3/11/2003 00857 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 60383 3/11/2003 00932 60384 3/11/2003 00986 60385 3/11/2003 00997 60386 3/11/2003 i02747 60387 3/7/2003 02638 60388 3/11/2003 01977 60389 3/11/2003 01028 60390 3/11/2003 01124 60391 3/11/2003 01147 60392 3/11/2003 01200 60393 3/11/2003 02749 60394 3/11/2003 01263 'MAPLEWOOD BAKERY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CT MN CHAPTER OF IAPMO MN MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSN MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION MN STATE TREASURER STAX NATL ASSN OF TOWN WATCH - NATW NATL REGISTRY OF EMT NOVAK, MIKE NUCPS/TI ALUMNI ASSOCIATION PIKE, GARY 60395 3/11/2003 02061 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO INC 60396 3/11/2003 01313 PUMP AND METER SERVICE INC 60397 3/11/2003 01331 RAB B ETT, KEVIN 60398 3/11/2003 02714 RASMUSSEN, KEVIN 60399 3/11/2003 00069 RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES 60400 3/11/2003 01387 ROSS I N I, DR. JAMES 60401 3/11/2003 01418 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 60402 3/11/2003 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF Description /Account 3990 WHITE 8 3/4" X 50 YDS 1177 GREEN FILM 18" X 50 YDS REIMBURSE FOR TUITION & BOOKS REIMBURSE FOR TUITION AND BOOKS ,PATROL & BOARDING FEES BASKETBALL SCOREKEEPER - 7 REIMBURSE FOR STETHOSCOPE COPIER COST TOW FORFEITURE TOW SQUAD TOW FORFEITURE REPAIR AMB MEDIC 2 RELOCATION MGR FOR 189 LARPENTE RELOCATION MGR FOR 1701 ADOLPHU 2003 MEMBERSHIP REIMBURSE FOR PRKG & MILEAGE 1/1 REIMBURSE MEALS 2/16 DEPOSIT FOR ENTERTAINER ON 4/17 REIMBURSE FOR MEALS 2/16 TO 2/17 HRC POSTER CONTEST FLYER HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION DUES 2003 EXP CONF REGISTRATION 2003 EXP CONF REGISTRATION BIRTHDAY CAKES 'MONTHLY SAC - FEB INTERVIEW TAPE 2003 IAPMO MEMBERSHIP 2003 DUES & QTRLY SRV AGREEMENT MUNICIPAL UTIL INSPECTOR TRNG - 2 MONTHLY SURTAX - FEB ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 2003 MEMBERSHIPS - 8 REIMBURSE FOR BOOTS 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES REIMBURSE FOR MEALS 2/4 - 2/12 REIMBURSE FOR MEALS & PRKG 2/13 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL PETRO VEND 20 -8042 FUEL SITE CONT REIMBURSE FOR SAFE & SOBER SUPP REIMBURSE FOR TUITION & BOOKS BASKETBALL REFEREE - 4 COLLECTION AGENCY FEE FITNESS PROGRAM FEES MERCH FOR RESALE 'MERCH FOR RESALE MERCH FOR RESALE PROGRAM SUPPLIES MERCH FOR RESALE MERCH FOR RESALE PROGRAM SUPPLIES MERCH FOR RESALE PROGRAM SUPPLIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES CRIME LAB SERVICES - JAN Amount 2,971.48 1,150.20 661.80 618.00 2,200.99 45.50 133.47 342.36 122.48 58.58 124:88 1,233.68 70.00 444.75 35.00 22.32 18.04 550.00 23.71 247.53 170.06 175.00 175.00 137.25 21,458.25 20.00 50.00 6,815.84 230.00 1,779.50 25.00 160.00 144.95 25.00 50.27 35.15 1,103.25 10,655.32 58.25 846.00 52.00 11.00 100.00 141.52 108.60 18.30 163.11 259.31 207.44 190.45 279.73 120.38 294.49 85.00 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 0 /07 /2QQ3 10:52:55AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor 60402 3/11/2003 01504 60403 3/11/2003 02422 60404 3/11/2003 01546 60405 3/11/2003 01550 60406 3/11/2003 01669 ST PAUL, CITY OF (Continued) MEDICAL SUPPLIES 250.72 STACKPOLE III, JOHN A BASKETBALL REFEREE 80.00 SUBURBAN SPORTSWEAR LLC SOFTBALL V -NECK JERSEY 1,780.75 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 2,980.40 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & TOW FORFEITURE 135.85 TOW FORFEITURE 79 42 Checks in this report Total checks: 62,527.79 I CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee 02/28/03 03/03/03 MN State Treasurer 02/28/03 03/03/03 U.S. Treasurer 02/28/03 03/03/03 P.E.R.A. 03/03/03 03/04/03 MN State Treasurer 02/28/03 03/04/03 MN State Treasurer 03/04/03 03/05/03 MN State Treasurer 03/05/03 03/06/03 MN State Treasurer TOTAL Description Drivers License /Deputy Registrar Federal Payroll Tax P.E.R.A. Drivers License /Deputy Registrar State Payroll Tax Drivers License /Deputy Registrar Drivers License /Deputy Registrar Amount 11,957.25 86,551.77 47,443.82 24,207.00 21,802.26 16,380.48 11,619.13 219,961.71 vchlist Check Register Page: 1 03/14/2003 10:40:51AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor 60407 3/11/2003 01080 MN CHF OF POLICE EDUC FOUND 60408 3/18/2003 01622 3M SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA 60409 3/18/2003 00076 ALPHA BITS 60410 3/18/2003 00090 AMERICAN RED CROSS 60411 3/18/2003 00120 AQUA LOGIC INC 60412 3/1 8/2003 00159 BARTZ, PAUL 60413 3/18/2003 00164 BAY FIREWORKS INC 60414 3/1 8/2003 02756 BOTHWELL, KRISTIN 60415 3/18/2003 01922 BREHEIM, ROGER .60416 3/18/2003 00232 BURNETT, MORLEY AND BETH 60417 3/18/2003 00240 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES 60418 3/18/2003 02751 CON LI N, NICOLE 60419 3/18/2003 00330 COPY SERVICE CORP. 60420 3/18/2003 00462 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. 60421 3/18/2003 00489 FACILITY SYSTEMS, INC 60422 3/18/2003 00532 FRANK MADDEN & ASSN 60423 3/18/2003 00539 FREEDOM VALU CENTER 60424 3/18/2003 00585 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL , 60425 3/18/2003 02438 HAWKENSON, HANNAH 60426 3/18/2003 00677 HOME DEPOT - GECF 60427 3/18/2003 `02237 IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS 60428 3/18/2003 00718 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622 60429 3/18/2003 00718 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622 60430 3/18/2003 00718 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622 60431 3/18/2003 02753 JOHN MOORMAN INC 60432 3/18/2003 02408 JOHNSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 60433 3/18/2003 00789 KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO '60434 3/18/2003 01894 :KELLY & FAWCETT PA 60435 3/18/2003 02728 KIMLEY -HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 60436 3/18/2003 00782 KPMG LLP 60437 3/18/2003 00828 L M C I T 60438 3/18/2003 00857 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 60439 .3/18/2003 00857 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 60440 3/18/2003 02248 LINN, BRYAN 60441 3/18/2003 00891 MAMA 60442 3/18/2003 00898 M F A P C 60443 3/18/2003 02754 M P HANSON ASSOCIATES 60444 3/18/2003 00894 MBPTA 60445 3/18/2003 00894 MBPTA 60446 3/18/2003 00997 MIDWEST CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CT 60447 3/18/2003 01051 MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 60448 3/18/2003 00395 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPT OF 60449 3/18/2003 01156 NELSON, JEAN 60450 3/18/2003 02125 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS 60451 3/18/2003 02629 NOVACARE CBO 60452 3/18/2003 01202 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC Description /Account MN CHIEFS CONF REGISTRATION - 2 3M ORCHESTRA CONCERTS MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT INSTRUCTOR FEES PUMP REPLACEMENT REIMBURSE MEAL 1/28 FIREWORKS INVENTORY REIMBURSE FOR WSI CLASS REIMBURSE FOR SAFETY SHOES REPLACE WIRELESS HANDHELD MIC APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECK YOUTH BASKETBALL COACH COPIER LEASE REPAIR SIREN #5 WORKSPACE FURNITURE, CUBICLE M WORKSPACE FURNITURE, CUBICLE M WORKSPACE FURNITURE, CUBICLE M WORKSPACE FURNITURE, CUBICLE 'M WORKSPACE FURNITURE, CUBICLE M WORKSPACE FURNITURE, CUBICLE. M LEGAL SERVICES THROUGH 2/28 CAR WASHES BILLABLE LOCATE TICKETS BASKETBALL COACH STATION 7 SUPPLIES .AMBULANCE REPORT BOOKS COMM EDUC GYM RENTAL - BASKETB GYM RENTAL - VOLLEYBALL GYM .RENTAL - VOLLEYBALL GYM RENTAL - VOLLEYBALL CERTIFIED POOUSPA COURSE R850OS -1 C 10C 25C KENWOOD REPEATI UNLEADED MID -GRADE (89 OCTANE) G PROSECUTION - FEB LEGAL SERVICES - FEB PROJ 02 -14 PROF SERVICES THRU 1/31 AUDIT FEES JUDGMENT -A MELTON 11038260 MN CITY OFFICIAL DIRECTORY - 8 REFERENCE HANDBOOK 'REIMBURSE FOR MEALS /MILEAGE 2/23 i 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2003 -04 CITY LEADERSHIP PLNG RETRE MBPTA SPRING SEMINAR - 3 2003 MBPTA MEMBERSHIPS - 3 INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL PUMP BACK PACKS - 3 REIMBURSE MILEAGE 1/1 TO 2/28 9 -1 -1 RECORDING DEVICE UPGRADE, PRE- EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL CITY NEWSLETTER - MARCH Amount 455.00 588.30 400.00 56.00 2,765.11 7.95 10,000.00 95.00 147.90 327.19 50.00 200.00 123.39 255.00 4,750.86 137.50 4.89 28.97 302.57 1,286.52 73.00 89.46 15.50 250.00 80.77 615.98 602.40 67.50 60.00 37.50 189.00 10,868.33 9,664.83 9,825.00 14,231.17 8,922.68 13,000.00 928.37 298.41 60.00 180.77 50.00 35.00 2,400.00 90.00 45.00 20.00 280.00 295.76 74.60 1,634.78 75.00 2,665.00 vchlist. Check Register Page: 2 03/14/2003 10:40:51 AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60453 3/18/2003 01213 OLSON, JULIE REIMBURSE FOR MEALS & PRKG 1/15 - : 55.17 60454 3/18/2003 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF INTOXILYZER RECERT CLASS 40.00 INTOXILYZER TRAINING 200.00 INTOXILYZER TRAINING 200.00 60455 3/18/2003 01359 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX CAR WASHES 239.27 60456 3/18/2003 01340 REGIONS HOSPITAL PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES 273.74 60457 3/18/2003 00069 RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES COLLECTION AGENCY FEE 15.00 60458 3/18/2003 01409 S.E.H. PROD 02 -02 PROF SRVS - JAN 39.57 PROJ 01 -14 PROF SRVS THRU 1/31 223,257.45 PROJ 01 -23 PROF SRVS THRU 1/31 23,134.11 60459 3/18/2003 02755 SANDSTROM, ERIC SQUAD 948, 980 & 947 SET -UP 750.00 60460 3/18/2003 01468 SLABA, JACLEE MCC POSTER FOR PERFORMANCE 60.00 60461 3/18/2003 02240 SPOKESMAN - RECORDER POLICE /PARAMEDIC EMPLOYMENT AD 102.34 60462 3/18/2003 02752 ST JOHN'S NUTRITION CARE REFRESHMENTS FOR COUNCIL RETRE 29.82 60463 3/18/2003 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF 50,000 GALLONS OF WATER BY FIRE DE 109.62 60464 3/18/2003 01635 TOWER ASPHALT INC WINTER MIX 87.33 60465 3/18/2003 01692 U S POSTAL SERVICE STANDARD MAIL FEE PERMIT #00625 150.00 60466 3/18/2003 01704 URBANSKI, HOLLY REPLENISH PETTY CASH 72.94 60467 3/18/2003 02464 US BANK GEN OBLIGATION TAX INC BOND - 332 175.00 GEN OBLIGATION IMPRV BONDS - 331 175.00 GEN OBLIGATION TAX INC BOND - 328 325.00 GEN OBLIGATION IMPRV REF BOND - 3 325.00 60468 3/18/2003 02581 US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSN 2003 PAYING AGENT FEE - 2002A 373.75 60469 3/18/2003 02410 WELLS FARGO LEASING INC RICOH COPIER LEASE - MAR 1 60470 3/18/2003 02462 WEMYSS, SCOTT D NAME TAGS 26.61 60471 3/18/2003 01190 XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DATE 3/5/03 52,482.73 65'Checks in this report Total checks : 403,222.98 0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pale Description Amount 03/06/03 03/07/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 15,153.00 02/28/03 03/07/03 WI Dept of Revenue State Payroll Tax 1 03/06/03 03/07/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP & Flex plan payments 550.00 03/06/03 03/07/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1 03/07/03 03/10/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 15,590.19 03/10/03 03/11/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 18,343.63 03/11/03 03/12/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 24,418.74 03/12/03 03/13/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 11,387.00 03/07/03 03/13/03 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 32,024.39 TOTAL 120,143.62 7 { z s� vchlist t! 03/21/2003 1:23:23PM { Check Register City of Maplewood Page: 1 zJ Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60472 3/14/2003 01523 STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICITY ELECTRICAL LICENSE & EXAM FEE - 2 70.00 60473 3/25/2003 01047 3M ECF TRANSFER TAPE 265.29 RED /BLK ELECTRONIC FILM 766.80 WHITE SCOTCHLITE REFL SHTG 315.51 RED SCOTCHLITE REFL SHTG 315.51 60474 3/25/2003 01908 ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF FEB 2003 HARBOR BACKUP 532.81 JAN 2003 WAN CHARGES 392.00 60475 3/25/2003 00115 ANZALDI, MANDY REIMB BDAY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 67.42 60476 3/25/2003 02759 APCO MINNESOTA CHAPTER 3 SEMINAR FEES 270.00 60477 3/25/2003 .00130 ASIAN AMERICAN PRESS EMPLOYMENT AD 110.25 60478 3/25/2003 02658 AVENET LLC INTERNET DOMAIN NAME CHANGE 75.00 60479 3/25/2003 00152 BANICK, JOHN TUITION AND BOOKS 871.00 60480 3/25/2003 00171 BEHAN, JAMES REIMB MILEAGE 47.45 60481 3/25/2003 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE 312.00 MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE 117.00 MERCHANDISE FOR RESALE 156.00 - 60482 3/25/2003 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. CONSULTING 02 -07 1,475.60 CONSULTING 01 -23 422.00 60483 3/25/2003 01986 BUSACK, DANIEL TUITION AND BOOKS 656.87 60484 3/25/2003 00274 C.A.T.C.O. REBUILD DIFFERENTIAL 2,842.49 60485 3/25/2003 02472 CAPITAL TITLE CORPORATION O &E REPORT FOR PARCEL #11 125.00 _ O &E REPORT FOR PARCEL #5 70.00 60486 3/25/2003 02746 CLOVER SUPER FOODS INC MDSE FOR RESALE 75.20 MDSE FOR RESALE 83.93 60487 3/25/2003 00353 CURTIS 1000 ANNUAL STATIONARY ORDER (EXCL 4 60488 3/25/2003 02761 DAHLGREN, SHARDLOW AND UBAN PROF SERVICES HIJACEK PROPERTY 58.95 60489 3/25/2003 02635 G -WHIZ LETTERING LOGO FOR UNIFORM SHIRTS 110.50 60490 3/25/2003 02760 GOETZKE, JOE SCOREKEEPER JAN -FEB 110.00 60491 3/25/2003 00612 GYM WORKS INC FEB PREVENTIVE MAINT 510.65 60492 3/25/2003 00718 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622 BLDG SUPERVISION 157.50 BLDG SUPERVISION 161.25 BLDG SUPERVISION 281.25 60493 3/25/2003 00785 KAMCOM TECHNOLOGIES PC'S AS QUOTED 2.0 GHZ, 60 GB HARD 9,703.36 60494 3/25/2003 00821 KVAM, DAVID REIMB FOR DWI DETECTION TRAINING 112.28 60495 3/25/2003 02277 LAFFERTY, WALTER D UNIFORMS /SLACKS 33.98 60496 3/25/2003 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 155.50 BIRTHDAY CAKES 186.00 60497. 3/25/2003 00935 MAPLEWOOD FIRE FIGHTERS RELIEF SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS REIMB FRO 4,194.00 60498 3/25/2003 00945 MASYS CORP APRIL 2003 STRATUS SOFTWARE MAIN 738.68 60499 3/25/2003 02703 MATRX EMERGENCY MEDICAL EQUIP NITROUS OXIDE NITRONOX FIELD MODE 6,570.00 60500 3/25/2003 01819 MCLEOD USA FEB 2003 DSL SERVICE 705.14 60501 3/25/2003 00975 MERIT CHEVROLET CORE EXCHANGES 2,767.94 60502 3/25/2003 00983 METRO SALES INC 2003 RICOH COPIER MAINT 3,682.46 60503 3/25/2003 02547 MIDWEST HEARTLAND #2 DIESEL, LOW SULPHUR RED DYED 8,113.00 60504 3/25/2003 01023 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSN SEARCH WARRANT FORMS 13.85 60505 3/25/2003 01126 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001 PERA LIFE INS - MARCH 261.00 60506 3/25/2003 01175 NORTH ST PAUL, CITY OF MONTHLY UTILITIES 2/9 -3/11 1,955.43 MONTHLY UTILITIES 2/9 -3/11 401.92 MONTHLY UTILITIES 2/9 -3/11 218.29 60507 3/25/2003 02709 NORTH STAR GARAGE INC .2003 DODGE INTREPID 15,686.39 60508 3/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF INDIANHEAD - LOCKIN DEPOSIT 200.00 60509 3/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF J GREER - OVERPD MEMBERSHIP 55.00 60510 3/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF V BLUE - PRESCHOOL 40.00 60511 3/25/2003 01941 PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES BASKETBALL LEAGUE TROPHIES - 1ST 1 2,595.60 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 03/2112003 ..1:23 :23PM City of Maplewood a �a Check Date Vendor 60512 3/25/2003 01254 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 60513 3/25/2003 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE 60514 3/25/2003 01409 S.E.H. 60515 3/25/2003 01463 SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE 60516 3/25/2003 02086 ST PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMM 60517 3/25/2003 01526 STATE TREASURER 60518 3/25/2003 01560 SUPERIOR SERVICES INC 60519 3/25/2003 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC 60520 3/25/2003 02164 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON. 60521 3/25/2003 01026 TRANSPORTATION, DEPT OF 60522 3/25/2003 01683 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 60523 3/25/2003 01699 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 60524 3/25/2003 01750 WATSON CO INC, THE 53 Checks in this report Total checks : 239 Description /Account Amount MDSE FOR RESALE 844.60 MDSE FOR RESALE 241.63 MDSE FOR RESALE 299.91 MDSE FOR RESALE 490.28 CONSULTING ENGINEER 02 -22 - FEB 2 10 PREP OF SEWER STUDY 03 -03 - FEB 2 4 DESIGN SERVICES 03 -04 - FEB 2003 12 DESIGN SERVICES 01 -14 - FEB 2003 1,412.51 FEB MASSAGES 3 2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES 355.00 BLDG CODE SEMINAR - 4 EMPLOYEES 140.00 FEB RECYCLING 14 PROJECT 01 -15 CTY RD D .114 ENGINEERING 01 -16 48.80 ENGINEERING 01 -29 751.61 TESTING FOR PROJECT 01 -15 387.01 BADGES 184.05 EROSION /SEDIMENT CONTROL WORKSI 95.00 MDSE FOR RESALE 359.63 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account J Transmitted Settlement Date Date Pad, e Description Amount 03/13/03 03/14/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 11 ,155.86 03/14/03 03/14/03 ICMA (Vantagepointe) Deferred Compensation 6 03/13/03 03/14/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP & Flex plan payments 100.02 03/13/03 03/14/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 598.50 03/14/03 03/17/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12 03/14/03 03/17/03 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 84 03/14/03 03/17/03 P.E. R.A. P.E. R.A. 46,766.51 03/17/03 03/18/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 14 ol 03/14103 03/18/03 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 16 03/14103 03/18/03 Federal Reserve Bank Savings Bonds 400.00 03/18/03 03/19/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12 03/13/03 03/19/03 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 8 03/19/03 03/20/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 13 TOTAL 2279749.51 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 11 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 03/14/03 COLLINS, KENNETH 357.47 dd 03/14/03 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 357.47 dd 03/14/03 KOPPEN, MARVIN 357.47 dd 03/14/03 DARST, ROBERTA 1 dd 03/14/03 FURSMAN, RICHARD 4,869.60 dd 03/14/03 SCHLINGMAN, PAUL 2,026.22 dd 03/14/03 SEEGER, GERALD 544.00 dd 03/14/03 SWANSON, LYLE 1,680.15 dd 03/14/03 CARLSON, THERESE 2J33.34 dd 03/14/03 LE, SHERYL 3 dd 03/14/03 FAUST, DANIEL 3,870.90 dd 03/14/03 URBANSKI, HOLLY 1,661.45 :dd 03/14/03 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1 -dd 03/14/03 BAUMAN, GAYLE 2 dd 03/14/03 JACKSON, MARY 1,715.85 dd 03/14/03 KELSEY, CONNIE 1 :dd 03/14/03 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,657.46 dd 03/14/03 FRY, PATRICIA 1,599.91 dd 03/14/03 GUILFOILE, KAREN 2,671.16 dd 03/14/03 OSTER, ANDREA 1,663.75 dd 03/14/03 CARLE, JEANETTE L559.94 dd 03/14f03 JAGOE, CAROL :1,536.65 dd 03/14/03 JOHNSON, BONNIE 977.97 dd 03/14/03 OLSON, SANDRA 1 Ad 03/14/03 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,611.77 dd 03/14/03 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,486.25 W 03/14/03 MARTINSON, CAROL 1 dd 03/14/03 POWELL, PHILIP 1,916.62 dd 03/14/03 :SPANGLER, EDNA 352.00 dd 03/14/03 THOMALLA, DAVID 3,546.50 dd 03/14/03 ABEL, CLINT 109.66 dd 03/14/03 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2 dd 03/14/03 ANDREWS, SCOTT 2,950.63 dd 03/ 14/03 BAKKE, LONN 2J77.35 dd 03/14/03 BANICK, JOHN 3 dd 03/14/03 BELDE, STANLEY 2,218.78 dd 03/14/03 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 1 dd 03/14/03 BOHL, JOHN 2 dd 03/14/03 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,115.21 dd 03/14/03 COFFEY, KEVIN 1,493.80 dd 03/14/03 DOBLAR, RICHARD 2,115.21 dd 03/14/03 HALWEG, KEVIN 3,250.41 dd 03/14/03 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,333.38 dd 03/14/03 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2477.39 11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 12 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 03/14/03 JOHNSON, KEVIN 2 dd 03/14/03 KARIS, FLINT 2,737.93 dd 03/14/03 KONG, TOMMY 1,908.07 dd 03/14/03 KROLL, BRETT 1,763.06 dd 03/14/03 KVAM, DAVID 2,749.89 dd 03/14/03 LARSON, DANIEL 2 dd 03/14/03 LU, JOHNNIE 1,825.19 dd 03/14/03 MARINO, JASON 1,700.93 dd 03/14/03 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,197.61 dd 03/14/03 METRY, ALESIA 1 dd 03/14/03 OLSON, JULIE 2,231.72 dd 03/14/03 PALMA, STEVEN 2 dd 03/14/03 PIKE, GARY 2,177.35 dd 03/14/03 RABBETT, KEVIN 2,783.47 dd 03/14/03 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3 dd 03/14/03 STOCKTON, DERRELL 2,301.63 dd 03/14/03 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,301.63 dd 03/14/03 THIENES, PAUL 3,119.04 dd 03/14/03 TRAN, JOSEPH 1,609.32 Ad 03/14/03 WATCZAK, LAURA 2,322.34 dd 03/14/03 WENZEL, JAY 2,270.55 dd 03/14/03 XIONG, KAO 1,763.06 dd 03/14/03 BARTZ, PAUL 2,469.65 dd 03/14/03 BERGERON, JOSEPH 3,108.39 dd 03/14/03 CROTTY, KERRY 2,280.92 dd 03/14/03 DUGAS, MICHAEL 1 dd 03/14/03 DUNN, ALICE 2,998.94 dd 03/14/03 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 102.29 dd 03/14/03 EVERSON, PAUL 1,889.31 dd 03/14/03 FLOR, TIMOTHY 2,560.04 dd 03/14/03 FRASER, JOHN 2,433.36 dd 03/14/03 HALWEG, JODI 1,556.55 dd 03/14/03 KATZMAN, BARBARA 1,510.25 dd 03/14/03 PARSONS, KURT 1,845.92 dd 03/14/03 ROSSMAN, DAVID 2,406.74 dd 03/14/03 DAWSON, RICHARD 1,628.85 dd 03/14/03 DUELLMAN, KIRK 1,700.19 dd 03/14/03 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 1 dd 03/14/03 NOVAK, JEROME 1 dd 03/14/03 PETERSON, ROBERT 1,755.71 dd 03/14/03 SVENDSEN, RONALD 1,628.85 dd 03/14/03 GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 2,358.29 dd 03/14/03 BOYER, SCOTT 1,756.65 dd 03/14/03 FEHR, JOSEPH 2,077.85 dd 03/1 4/03 FLAUGHER, JAYME 1,756.65 dd 03/14/03 LAFFERTY, WALTER 1,756.65 12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 13 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 03/14/03 LINN, BRYAN 1,650.78 dd 03/14/03 PACOLT, MARSHA 1 dd 03/14/03 RABINE, JANET 2,077.86 dd 03/14/03 STAHNKE, JULIE 1,756.65 dd 03/14/03 LUKIN, STEVEN 3,115.54 dd 03/14/03 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 2487.66 dd 03/14/03 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,722.11 dd 03/14/03 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 268.49 dd 03/14/03 AHL, R. CHARLES 3,982.10 dd 03/14/03 NIVEN, AMY 1,232.08 dd 03/14/03 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,391.25 dd 03/14/03 WEGWERTH, JUDITH 1,666.06 dd 03/ 14/03 BRINK, TROY L628.64 dd 03/14/03 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1 dd 03/14/03 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,739.25 dd 03/14/03 KANE, MICHAEL 2,643.39 dd 03/14/03 LUTZ, DAVID 1,743.86 dd 03/14/03 MEYER, GERALD 1,810.08 dd 03/14/03 NAGEL, BRYAN 1,908.85 dd 03/14/03 OSWALD, ERICK 1,911.15 dd 03/14/03 TEVLIN, TODD 1,438.45 dd 03/14/03 BOHMBACH, JOSHUA 257.40 dd -03/14/03 CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER 2 dd 03/14/03 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,124.65 dd 03/14/03 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,124.66 dd 03/14/03 PECK, DENNIS 2,218.68 dd 03/14/03 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 2 dd 03/14/03 :SCHACHT, ERIN 205.45 dd '03/14/03 TATE, FRANK 1 dd 03/14/03 VERMEERSCH, CHARLES 1 dd 03/14/03 ANDERSON, BRUCE 3,782.47 dd 03/14/03 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN 1,666.06 dd 03/14/03 HERSOM, HEIDI 2,029.67 dd 03/14/03 MARUSKA, MARK 2 dd 03/14/03 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,433.45 dd 03/14/03 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1 dd 03/14/03 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,316.68 dd 03/14/03 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET 1,309.04 dd 03/14/03 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,031.16 dd 03/14/03 KOS, HEATHER 429.00 dd 03/14/03 NELSON, JEAN 979.28 dd 03/14/03 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 1,792.65 dd 03/14/03 COLEMAN, MELINDA 3 dd 03/14/03 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 2 dd 03/14/03 KROLL, LISA 1 dd 03/14/03 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 922.97 13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 14 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 03/14/03 SINDT, ANDREA 1 dd 03/14/03 THOMPSON, DEBRA 602.82 dd 03/14/03 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,290.25 dd 03/14/03 BERGO, CHAD 1 dd 03/14/03 FINWALL, SHANN 1 dd 03/14/03 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,483.35 dd 03/14/03 CARVER, NICHOLAS .2,346.15 dd 03/14/03 FISHER, DAVID 2 dd 03/14/03 SWAN, DAVID 1,415.05 dd 03/14/03 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 2,211.05 dd 03/14/03 ANZALDI, MANDY 801.50 dd 03/14/03 BARNES, JESSE 160.00 dd 03/14/03 DAVISON, LINCOLN 811.75 dd 03/14/03 FINN, GREGORY 1,776.22 dd 03/ 14/03 FLUG, ELAINE 8 5.5 0 dd 03/14/03 GAETZ, HOLLY 98.00 dd 03/14/03 GRAF, MICHAEL 1 dd 03/14/03 KELLY, LISA 1 dd 03/14/03 LUSHANKO, ADAM 98.00 dd :03/14/03 MCBRIDE, PATRICK 60.00 dd 03/14/03 NIEMAN, JAMES 160.00 dd 03/14/03 ROBBINS, AUDRA 1,648.82 dd 03/14/03 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,513.20 Ad 03/14/03 WHITNEY, ROBERT G 96.00 dd 03/14/03 ZIELINSKI, JOSEPH 49.00 dd 03/14/03 BREHEIM, ROGER 1 dd 03/14/03 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1,839.90 dd 03/14/03 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 107.06 dd 03/14/03 CRO S S ON, LINDA 2 dd 03/14/03 'DIAZ, SUSAN 398.85 dd 03/14/03 EASTMAN, THOMAS 2,345.93 dd 03/14/03 ERICKSON, KYLE 728.61 .dd 03/14/03 LEIER, SARA 177.50 dd 03/14/03 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 354.78 dd 03/14/03 STAPLES, PAULINE 2,641.74 dd 03/14/03 BENDTSEN, LISA 135.00 dd 03/14/03 CORNER, AMY 83.20 dd 03/14/03 ERICKSON, CAROL 45.00 dd 03/ 14/03 GUZIK, JENNIFER 71.50 dd 03/14/03 HALEY, BROOKE 81.25 dd 03/14/03 HORWATH, RONALD 1 dd 03/14/03 IRISH, KARL 191.76 dd 03/14/03 KOEHNEN, MARY 457.42 dd 03/14/03 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 293.75 dd 03/14/03 LAWSON, JOSHUA 55.25 dd 03/14/03 MARUSKA, ERICA 112.70 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 15 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 03/14/03 OVERBY, ANNA 108.00 dd 03/14/03 POWERS, JESSICA 38.60 dd 03/14/03 SCHULTZ, PETER 78.00 dd 03/14/03 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 450.85 dd 03/14/03 THOEMKE, MARIE 5 0.00 dd 03/14/03 GROPPOLI, LINDA 369.68 dd 03/14/03 RENSLOW, RITA 94.05 dd 03/14/03 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 59.85 dd 03/14/03 LONETTI, JAMES 905.55 dd 03/14/03 PRINS, KELLY 848.28 dd 03/14/03 REILLY, MICHAEL L601.39 dd 03/14/03 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 515.38 dd 03/14/03 AICHELE, CRAIG 1,710.25 dd 03/14/03 PRIEM, STEVEN 1 dd 03/14/03 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 1,629.87 dd 03/14/03 HURLEY, STEPHEN 2,687.07 wf 92776 03/14/03 CARDINAL, ROBERT 406.20 wf 92777 03/14/03 WASILUK, JULIE 357.47 wf 92778 03/14/03 INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS 75.00 wf .92779 03/14/03 KARSTENS, BRAD 106.25 wf 92780 03/14/03 JAHN, DAVID 1 wf 92781 03/14/03 MALDONADO, JUANA 675.13 wf `92782 03/14/03 MORIN, TROY 229.50 wf 92783 03/14/03 1VMATHEYS, ALANA 1 wf 92784 03/14/03 HANSEN., LORI 1,509.45 wf 92785 03/14/03 VIETOR, LORRAINE 102.78 wf 92786 03/14/03 PALANK, MARY 1,544.65 wf 92787 03/14/03 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,541.26 wf 92788 03/14/03 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1,700.28 wf 92789 03/14/03 TICHY, PAMELA 84.00 wf 92790 03/14/03 STEINER, JOSEPH 453.00 wf -92791 03/14/03 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2,301.63 wf 92792 03/14/03 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 2,364.80 wf 92793 03/14/03 LEDMAN, KEVIN 396.13 wf 92794 03/14/03 OLINGER, SHELLEY 1 wf 92795 03/14/03 FREBERG, RONALD 1 wf 92796 03/14/03 JONES, DONALD 1,673.65 - wf 92797 03/14/03 ELIAS, JAMES 2,218.68 wf 92798 03/14/03 EDSON, DAVID 2 wf 92799 03/14/03 HELEY, ROLAND 1,770.77 wf 92800 03/14/03 HINNENKAMP, GARY 1 wf 92801 03/14/03 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,736.55 wf 92802 03/14/03 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1 wf 92803 03/14/03 GERNES, CAROLE 334.38 wf 92804 03/14/03 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 57.38 wf 92805 03/14/03 SUNDE, JOEL 1 15 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 16 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 92806 03/14/03 ANDERSEN, ERIC 36.00 wf 92807 .03/14/03 ANDERSON, MIKE 44.00 wf 92808 03/14/03 ANZALDI, KALI 242.00 wf 92809 03/14/03 BANICK, PETER 31.50 wf 92810 03/14/03 BANICK, STEVE 44.00 wf 92811 03/14/03 BOTHWELL, KRISTIN 142.50 wf 92812 03/14/03 BROZAK, KATHERINE 40.00 wf 92813 03/14/03 CARR, JAYME 40.00 wf 92814 03/14/03 CHEZIK, STACEY 52.00 wf 92815 03/14/03 DEGREE, AMANDA 240.13 wf 92816 03/14/03 DEVRIES, LINDSAY 144.00 wf 92817 03/14/03 DRESSEN, EMILY 28.00 wf 92818 03/14/03 FEUCHT, KENNETH 160.00 wf 92819 03/14/03 FRANK, LAURA 440.25 wf 92820 03/14/03 FRANK, SARAH 130.00 wf 92821 03/14/03 GOODRICH, CHAD 87.00 wf 92822 03/14/03 GORE, MICHAEL 33.00 wf 92823 03/14/03 GREENER, DOUGLAS 90.00 =wf 92824 03/14/03 HARGROVE, CAYLA 22.50 wf 92825 03/14/03 HAWKES, SCOTT 70.00 wf 92826 03/14/03 - HELKAMP, KAYLA 88.00 wf 92827 - 03/14/03 HJELMGREN, NICOLE 40.00 wf 92828 03/14/03 HOIUM, PHILIP 216.00 wf 92829 03/14/03 HOLDER, RYAN 34.50 wf 92830 03/14/03 HORNER, JAY 120.00 wf 92831 03/14/03 HORNER, KIMBERLY 39.00 wf 92832 03/14/03 JAWORSKI, ERIC 33.00 wf 92833 03/14/03 KLEM, AMANDA 26.00 wf 92834 03/14/03 KLEM, JOSH 140.00 wf 92835 03/14/03 KRIER, JOHN 33.00 wf 92836 03/14/03 LARSON, RYAN 33.00 wf 92837 03/14/03 MARTINUCCI, KAITLIN 52.00 wf 92838 03/14/03 MICK, KYLE 33.00 wf 92839 03/14/03 MILLER, SHELBY 19.50 wf 92840 03/14/03 O'GRADY, ZACHARY 24.00 wf 92841 03/14/03 O'SHEA, CASSANDRA 19.50 wf 92842 03/14/03 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 332.56 wf 92843 03/14/03 RAYE, HOLLY 45.50 wf 92844 03/14/03 SHOBERG, KARI 196.00 wf 92845 03/14/03 SIKORA, JACOB 36.00 wf 92846 03/14/03 SIKORA, PAUL 45.00 wf 92847 03/14/03 TARR -JR, GUS 60.00 wf 92848 03/14/03 THELEN, TERRANCE 65.00 wf 92849 03/14/03 YORKOVICH, BRADLEY 196.00 wf 92850 03/14/03 GERMAIN, DAVID 1 wf 92851 03/14/03 HAAG, MARK 1 16 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 17 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 92852 03/14/03 NADEAU, EDWARD 2,643.39 Wf 92853 03/14/03 BEHR, HEATHER 386.90 Wf 92854 03/14/03 BROWN, LAURIE 280.45 Wf 92855 03/14/03 DISKERUD, HEATHER 157.25 Wf 92856 03/14/03 GLASS, JEAN 1,355.13 wf 92857 03/14/03 HOIUM, SHEILA 1 Wf 92858 03/14/03 JACK, NICOLE 159.75 Wf 92859 03/14/03 MOFFAT, ETHAN 125.80 Wf 92860 03/14/03 MOY, PAMELA 412.75 Wf 92861 03/14/03 PARTLOW, JOSHUA 289.66 wf 92862 03/14/03 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 1 Wf 92863 03/14/03 SHOBERG, CARY 697.58 Wf 92864 03/14/03 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 162.80 Wf 92865 03/14/03 UNGER, MARGARET 657.20 Wf 92866 03/14/03 YOUNG, DILLON 74.10 wf 92867 03/14/03 ABRAHAMSON, DANIEL 73.45 Wf 92868 03/14/03 ANDERSON, CALEB i130.00 Wf 92869 03/14/03 BACHMAN, NICOLE 50.40 Wf 92870 03/14/03 BRENEMAN, NEIL .218.98 wf 92871 '03/14/03 CASSELTON, JANE 29.25 wf 92872 03/14/03 CHAPMAN, JENNY 144.46 Wf 92873 03/14/03 COLE, NANCY 29.93 Wf -92874 03/14/03 COSTA, JOSEPH 274.73 wf -92875 .03/14/03 DIERICH, ANDREA 50.03 wf 92876 03/14/03 DOTY, JANET 240.46 wf 92877 03/14/03 :DUNK, RYAN 514.03 wf 92878 03/14/03 FENGER, JUSTIN _606.10 wf 92879 03/14/03 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 42.40 Wf -92880 03/14/03 FINNEGAN, KAREN 72.00 Wf 92881 03/14/03 FONTAINE, ANTHONY 76.08 wf 92882 03/14/03 FONTAINE, KIM 495.37 wf 92883 03/14/03 GRANT, MELISSA 12.7.29 wf 92884 03/14/03 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 351.44 Wf 92885 03/14/03 HOLMGREN, LEAH 53.08 wf 92886 03/14/03 HOULE, DENISE 208.00 Wf 92887 03/14/03 IRISH, GRACE 211.20 wf 92888 03/14/03 JOHNSON, ROBERT 145.49 Wf 92889 03/14/03 JOVONOVICH, TODD 64.00 wf 92890 03/14/03 JOYER, MARTI 100.78 wf 92891 03/14/03 KROLL, MARK 128.00 Wf 92892 03/14/03 LINDSTROM, AMANDA 97.50 Wf 92893 03/14/03 MATHISEN -JR, DEAN 461.25 Wf 92894 03/14/03 MCMAHON, MELISSA 151.20 wf 92895 03/14/03 MELCHER, ROBERT 139.75 wf 92896 03/14/03 MISEMER, BENJAMIN 52.00 Wf 92897 03/14/03 MOES, EMILIA 98.60 17 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD m CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME - AMOUNT wf 92898 03/14/03 O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE 92.19 Wf 92899 03/14/03 OLSON, MARGRET 97.50 Wf 92900 03/14/03 OTTESON, JANET 54.00 Wf 92901 03/14/03 OWEN, JONATHAN 176.00 Wf 92902 03/14/03 PALMER, JESSICA 25.00 Wf 92903 03/14/03 PEHOSKI, JOEL 102.90 Wf 92904 03/14/03 PROESCH, ANDY 158.84 Wf 92905 03/14/03 RENSTROM, KEVIN 220.40 Wf 92906 03/14/03 RODEN, JASON 178.50 Wf 92907 03/14/03 SMITLEY, SHARON 260.80 Wf 92908 03/14/03 TUPY, HEIDE 112.50 Wf 92909 03/14/03 TUPY, MARCUS 269.45 Wf 92910 03/14/03 WAGNER, ERIC 220.00 wf 92911 03/14/03 WARNER, CAROLYN 179.20 Wf 92912 03/14/03 WEDES, CARYL 125.10 wf 92913 03/14/03 WHITE, NICOLE 239.10 wf 92914 03/14/03 WOODMAN, ALICE 40.00 Wf 92915 03/14/03 BOSLEY, CAROL 377.20 Wf 92916 03/14/03 ESALA, HOPE 34.13 Wf 92917 03/14/03 HAGSTROM, EMILY 21.00 wf 92918 03/14/03 KELLY, MICHAEL 189.00 Wf 92919 03/14/03 KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE 162.50 wf 92920 '03/14/03 KUTA, SUSAN 60.00 Wf 92921 03/14/03 ODDEN, JESSICA 45.00 Wf 92922 03/14/03 OIE, :REBECCA 63.00 Wf 92923 03/14/03 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 323.01 Wf 92924 03/14/03 VAN HALE, PAULA 26.00 Wf 92925 03/14/03 BEHAN, JAMES 1,534.25 Wf 92926 03/14/03 COLLINS, ASHLEY 179.55 Wf 92927 03/14/03 DOBLAR, STEVE 102.45 Wf 92928 03/14/03 DOUGLASS, TOM 1 wf 92929 03/14/03 ECKER, JOHN 26.20 wf 92930 03/14/03 KYRK, ASHLEY 166.10 Wf 92931 03/14/03 LOGAN, HEATHER 56.10 wf 92932 03/14/03 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1322.28 wf 92933 03/14/03 PETERSON, LYNDSAY 41.70 wf 92934 03/14/03 RISTOW, JONATHAN 132.05 wf 92935 03/14/03 SARPONG, SEAN 159.85 wf 92936 03/14/03 SCHULZE, BRIAN 227.20 Wf 92937 03/14/03 SEVERSON, HOLLY 7.45 Wf 92938 03/14/03 YOUNG, MATTHEW 69.50 Wf 92939 03/14/03 ZIEMER, NICOLE 27.40 Wf 92940 03/14/03 MULVANEY, DENNIS 1,911.48 403,614.17 m Agenda # (<�� MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: March 24, 2003 RE: Temporary 3.2 Beer, Temporary Food and Carnival License Ac t r I� An application has been submitted for temporary 3.2 beer, temporary food and carnival licenses by Stephen Klein, on behalf of the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary, 1725 Kennard Street. The parish is having their annual Fall Festival event that will be held inside the parish. The funds raised during the event will be used to fund the grade school and childhood earning center. The event will be held on May 3 and 4 from 6:00 p.m. to midnight. Chief Thomalla will meet with event organizers regarding alcohol compliance. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the temporary intoxicating liquor and food permit. Agenda # MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: March 24, 2003 RE: 3.2 Malt Liquor License Acti by Cou Wit - ._ ....� A. .d ti Christy Phan - Inthisone has applied for a 3.2 Malt Liquor License. The Vietnam Restaurant located at 3035 White Bear Avenue is currently owned and managed by Jeanne Thai Hoang and has a 3.2 malt liquor license. Ms. Hoang is selling the business to Ms. Phan - Inthisone. City ordinance does not require a background investigation for 3.2 malt liquor but Chief Thomalla has met with Ms. Phan- Inthisone to discuss alcohol compliance and she has been given a copy of the_ City Code that pertains to holding a 3.2 malt liquor license. Agenda # MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner J Final Plat Beaver Lake Townhomes Second Addition South of Maryland Avenue and west of Sterling Street March. 10, 2003 INTRODUCTION Action by Councu" Rejected Tony Emmerich is requesting that the city council approve the Beaver Lake Townhomes Second - Addition final. plat. Mr. Emmerich represents the developer, Semler Construction. This final plat would create 16 lots in the second phase of the detached town houses within the site. This plat will be south of. Maryland Avenue and west of Sterling Street. (See the maps on pages 3 - 6.) BACKGROUND On May 28, 2002, ,the city. council made several approvals for the Beaver Lake Townhouses. These included: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 148 -unit housing development. The applicant requested the CUP because Section 36- 566(a). of the city code (shore.land district regulations) requires a PUD for developments with buildings having more than four -units when the site is in the shoreland district of a take: In this case, the site is in the shareland district of Beaver Lake and will have a mix of housing with 40 single - family detached townhomes and 108 rental units in 11 8 -unit and 5 4 -unit buildings. In addition, having a PUD gives the city and developer a chance to be more flexible with site design and development details (such as setbacks and street right -of -way and pavement widths) than the standard city requirements would normally allow. (See the approved site plan on page 6.) 2. Street right -of -way and easement vacations. These would be for the unused street right -of- ways and easements on the site. 3. A preliminary plat to create the lots in the development. 4. Authorization for city staff to spend city open space funds and to use a $150,000 DNR grant to buy about 8.9 acres of the project site for park and open space purposes. (See the city council minutes starting on page 7.) On July 9, 2002, the community design review board (CDRB) approved the proposed, design plans (architectural, landscaping, etc.) for the development. Mr. Emmerich appealed to the city council a part of the CDRB's approval about brick on the exteriors of the four and eight -unit buildings. On August 12, 2002, the city council approved Mr. Emmerich's appeal of the CDRB's condition about adding more brick to the four and eight -unit buildings within the site. (That is, the city will not be requiring Mr. Emmerich to add more brick to the buildings as the CDRB required.). Can August 26, 2002, the city council awarded the contract for the construction of the Beaver Lake sanitary, sewer improvement project to Barbarosoa and Sons, Inc. They completed this sewer project in December 2002. On November 13, 2002, the city council approved the first final plat for the Beaver Lake Townhomes. This plat created six lots for detached town houses along Maryland Avenue, several outlots for future phases of the development and the park area along the creek in the center of the site. DISCUSSION The developer has started grading and utility construction within this plat. In addition, the city's contractor has finished the construction of the new trunk sanitary sewer line through the site. The developer has completed all the conditions the council required for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Beaver Lake Townhomes Second Addition final plat. This approval is subject to the PP J county recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. p:sec25Beaver Lake Townhomes Second fin plat.doc Attachments: 1.. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4. Site Plan 5. 5 -28 -02 Council Minutes 6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment) 2 Attachment 1 v W . w M �n Y = MCt4VIGHT LN LARPENTEUR AVE Q� LLJ -.J m a IDAHO AVE Ct U ST o AVE. Cv Cn P te- o � 0 7 GERAlW� AV 9 r I MA NOLIA AVE o HOYT AVE. Beaver .: Z 7 MONTANA J - AVE. MONTANA MONTANA p �� �. � j CIRP TEVUN AVE. PL -I J z tn I z OWC CT. CIRPr pJ �►� 960N i in a Z Q HARVESTER AVE CASE AVE. U P AIMAEL. DR BRAND AVE. NEBRASiCA'� �.� °� 2 REBECCA DR pw* F- 1440N 0 71 h ST. �Mo,a 7th ST. F- Q' z C& r z Y BUSH TON oaft ; t'� % " .. pRU►N Pidc 04"Im Cr Z C j �- % -",a .� � CT to 5 PINE TREE M Pis 6 BIRCi MEW DR U 5 6 7 a, 7 ROWNG HILLS DR V F ZY) LM WV7�.1"Y�, LN AVE ' E. o . TILSEN � IN DR c � J Ix w COYOTE LN ) to LI J J TiLS AVE. i 2 K LN Z� J cT. 3 BEVERDALE RD W 2 X 3 4 5 ��ER W a �� HAWTHORNE A 5 c� . 1200N E. D A E.ROSE o ST o AVE. Cv Cn P te- o � 0 7 GERAlW� AV 9 r I MA NOLIA AVE o Beaver .: Z ..� Lake./" �•- m ��- w � p �� �. � j PL -I J z z J z � pJ �►� 960N i in a Z Q HARVESTER AVE CASE AVE. Z W P a: BRAND �i�C1.tip,EL LN. BRAND AVE. AVE. pw* F- 0 71 h ST. �Mo,a 7th ST. F- Q' z C& r z Y BUSH � o g AVE. Cr. 720N Co 2 MINNEHAHA AVE. En MARGARET AVE. 1 m LAMM * w '3M 5th f; AYE LOCATION MAP 3 4 N Attachment 2 r 1j PIT �� � C26) • \O Q.h .2 19 �� f42) 0, s (2s) a 2(44) 4 ZZ6 ��5 ^7.41•. 3 7.91 v.e" 4441 903 A R3 TO TA1. i I I ! 1� �V I.� I) cc. 4S 6 4o.03 60.03 :r.as 60.03 Gael w A w ^ O h M N N 1 ^ '4 5 :!9 N12 X13 r (sue) (0). CEO) (T V) i0.47 60 io • • Lo i0 , 1 re 71 (al: Cam;' i Css) Cw)i r;2 316 71110 11 14A N ' O G0 r.0! 1 Gc I I f. o (� SS:: ROSE AVE. +R . RO DR. Q-%..t , o L2. 1 'lri.l! t.3f • N j I J 15 14 11 7o o 5(`. I?L66 sa,d1 5'S s .�4 e 6 se t►.if GERANIUM - 4 39 38 - PARK all 1 46, 1 15 33 3. - .nom '4.0 ! 7-3-t. i .. 8 7 6 Jt it- ti PROJECT SITE O5 �' 162 �) 9 \00 • � ( 130) 1083 1084 u! 1 0 R. 1085 `7/ 321 Sa l is ► t. 1 . Aw 45s GO A 133.97 133. (2Z) ' ( •� � f/ oo� >P I $ 1 0 0 � N ' �' � tjq � :.'s1 r 14 4 133. 33. _ f o AC A (=) 0 t72J ' r / 33 = �• (v) I ° SCH OOU D I ST. s W r - IG . ! I I '" 78)17 14 '-1.. � 15 (z) �J_ � I � Z N (70) . b 1339 , 33.9 ` �/ (.4.9.3 1 Q > W 1068 (2�) 1 J 0 .41 m. -- - T „ Cam) / ; - 1060 • (71) b �t� i 1 139. W 3 9 i r . �•� I .5T • s' ," f 1 . 2.,..•..., - -_ J.95 - . J�b O ��) fz W lro) (4) �'f. _ �'t� 37 4' 2D' Serer E c ± ,1 r (9 1 Z. /�/ r 1 ' 2 1 10 '�` ' -: _ 106.6 S 7 / a' 163. 1'39.9 Li.. 1 �a f1t.$.2> I � (.5 t 0 (39) 20 (1 C:4 �/1 (ls) I $ (5) 9 1 (1.29a-Y _ v � � I 9 133.99 �. 1 9 � QI LU ) 1 c38) �/ c,�) c3a / o ! Y r 21 10 19 8 1 i N l (4) ` Irl. 134. 131 13 1 N PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 4 N 43 7 _ m ss o BEAVER LAKE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK • .23 I t 7 c30� t a 1. ' oto . I S4 • 8 s t '' 3 GS'. , _ _.. -_.. ,Y.::. ? - _. - M AVENUE" - X 330 - - - -• - .• 2645.00 } ROSEWOOD ESTATES 9 - SITE PROJECT 1 Rl ' O 330 3 R A N I U M AVE. - ' - VAC ATE D '4.29•eo•2; 77653 500 3 26.24 3ZI, �: F• W A0 W " Qs � I 3 44&c. r , v Z I Flowage esmt ,p CL so x' - y '�... Y. - T ' Dac.ItT3367r now TO TA1. i I I ! 1� �V I.� I) cc. 4S 6 4o.03 60.03 :r.as 60.03 Gael w A w ^ O h M N N 1 ^ '4 5 :!9 N12 X13 r (sue) (0). CEO) (T V) i0.47 60 io • • Lo i0 , 1 re 71 (al: Cam;' i Css) Cw)i r;2 316 71110 11 14A N ' O G0 r.0! 1 Gc I I f. o (� SS:: ROSE AVE. +R . RO DR. Q-%..t , o L2. 1 'lri.l! t.3f • N j I J 15 14 11 7o o 5(`. I?L66 sa,d1 5'S s .�4 e 6 se t►.if GERANIUM - 4 39 38 - PARK all 1 46, 1 15 33 3. - .nom '4.0 ! 7-3-t. i .. 8 7 6 Jt it- ti PROJECT SITE O5 �' 162 �) 9 \00 • � ( 130) 1083 1084 u! 1 0 R. 1085 `7/ 321 Sa l is ► t. 1 . Aw 45s GO A 133.97 133. (2Z) ' ( •� � f/ oo� >P I $ 1 0 0 � N ' �' � tjq � :.'s1 r 14 4 133. 33. _ f o AC A (=) 0 t72J ' r / 33 = �• (v) I ° SCH OOU D I ST. s W r - IG . ! I I '" 78)17 14 '-1.. � 15 (z) �J_ � I � Z N (70) . b 1339 , 33.9 ` �/ (.4.9.3 1 Q > W 1068 (2�) 1 J 0 .41 m. -- - T „ Cam) / ; - 1060 • (71) b �t� i 1 139. W 3 9 i r . �•� I .5T • s' ," f 1 . 2.,..•..., - -_ J.95 - . J�b O ��) fz W lro) (4) �'f. _ �'t� 37 4' 2D' Serer E c ± ,1 r (9 1 Z. /�/ r 1 ' 2 1 10 '�` ' -: _ 106.6 S 7 / a' 163. 1'39.9 Li.. 1 �a f1t.$.2> I � (.5 t 0 (39) 20 (1 C:4 �/1 (ls) I $ (5) 9 1 (1.29a-Y _ v � � I 9 133.99 �. 1 9 � QI LU ) 1 c38) �/ c,�) c3a / o ! Y r 21 10 19 8 1 i N l (4) ` Irl. 134. 131 13 1 N PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 4 N Attachment 3 rd - -North Line NW 1/4 Ramsey Co. C.LM of �, SEC. 25. T29N, R22W /-NE Comer NW► /4 `�, I a, N ° 56 'T 8 • E - Sea 2aT29N,R22W. �y 2644.70 .. BEAVER E TOWNHOMES 1 • ♦. • Ramsey Co. CI.M or NW Comer Gov'(. Lot i i • • • • , 1 2ND ADDITION. S ea 23. T29N.R22W. .• 1 .. _. l I V I 1 1 r .. , r 3 I m • IQ 11 1I r• 1.11 1r• • I 12 "E N85 5 7.0 "E S89'52'10 "E 59.81 sa9.5z'Yo F 'E. N76g8.13 _ _ - o - - - - o� ` m +ae6 21.01 6 5 7.1 3 I ^ k y • r. A o u o tui $ ` $ I Q O 0 1 1 2 . r. i-� 0 y h o Z IO a• i � I O iii �~ � -. C. v' r.►�roE � 6 �` /' �� SB7'T6'4s_w N89 �,► �:. I :; H :: ♦�� . °�Pti (� •�� i 76•g4'32 44.77 -'! - 4i 00 . • ' ��" /. ,_ 5 ° o. 5 .w \ 5 � 42.18 - u .Z 1' }5 N89'51 X 29 " II �� i W ►�. �i ti ♦ . - , / ._, N� 11 S 6 / �1 .♦+ to f4 0 '� �__ . -; �_ 1 , 0� 0 g•� / 1 �. *58 q D ti3 9. a 11.15 \ Y 4i / ti Si 44 36 �. a�s157.32 �. -'� 27.88 i. 34.70 1 0 ,'� , N g, 3.058 ' 78.7 62.58 " 1 .10 Y c w ZZi 4a R: :1 . a :N89 29 WIZ i Ir �•0 o w� �Sai ��� / 78.01'02 X .00 J 0 is t 1 * O P� + `l 1 ! e� � � / ♦ \ ► \•Y,I \•1 J 3•• S/ V 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 \1 ToI `./ �.. 446 CO \,.I 982.42'1? E' J ! C II: 28 ,` + 192 O 31 r 2 ?.O/- � � ♦`'`` 12 b cat I' ; I� Q 982 42'7 V1 , : 1 ►. ► i • W I 126.2. E X X 70.89. I I It LOT LINES TRE DISTANCES SHOWN I 13 �g b D/5 ANCfS OF THE LOT LINE ALON AND NOT THEE THE DISTANCE OF OR T O EASEMENT L1Nf5, UNLESS l0 O 2' i Gj OTHERWISE SHOWN. / I e i ! N82'4,2'12 • J�' _ 3 BASED UPON RAMSEY COUNTY COORDINATES. - NI- r\ . .. r , 1191 .58 N '.° NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983. - a In s- � ►..� h a S86'56 "W 118 .5:1 N W I • DENOTES 112 INCH DiA. X 14 INCHES IN LENGTH IRON 93 83 PIPE MONUMENT MONUMENT FOUND, MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP I INSCRIBED - RIVARD RLS 19421. ToI .W ' I •`� � v O b NO . MONUMENT SYMBOL AT ANY STATUTE REQUIRED LOCATION Q ` -♦ I ' �. ° rl ti. nI0 I DENOTES A 112 INCH D/A. X f1 INCHES IN LENGTH IRON to • h ° + PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED t in I I "' �O SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FEET • RIVARD RLS 19421' THAT WILL BE SET AND SHALL BE IN _ ?:� 1 1� PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE RECORDING DATE OF THIS 2� O ~ S88056'18'W 1 J- �__- - . W z %28 PLAT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY 0 40 80 4;b. Demons RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND ak o I ', ^ w, ` -- ~ EASEMENT PER PLAT OF. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET F i ` 2 • a I' > v �BEA tiER LAKE TOINVHOMES c, tA , ` S88 °56'18'W I ��' ..1� '��'1• iii e is CQ 101.49 ?� O LiIDWEST o _ h I 3 • B ' �s N01 '03'42 "W °I -18.00 Land Surveyors do Civil Engineers. Inc. �- 102.61 N88 °56'18 "E 189.93 . ♦ ►. I{ ' 11 r.I Il M M• I\ 1 11 11 -' 11 \1 PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 5 Attachment 4. 1 L y blot �\ 1 1 q 1 h r I r N I II b 1, � I II I I L I u i 1 I 1 I I �I w 1 1 a 1 II 1 I 11 1 1 � I� rlees r is N I ,t I � Q � 1 Q I a I° I O 1 I I 1 I I W 1 EAST R I A VENUE p t3 I I 1 I ' Ilaro�= I I0n0r.nzv I 17 {s {{4,2 10►Pma{{5,S IOOIP.{� �AIQd•5i'1! 6. ►' GERANIUM I A VENUE 1�4 1 a I I I , 10 - �.j , / ►oND a6e'se 715 J' , t — � i t • I 1 -- : � M _.:.- , � 1 _ a te~ i 1 . } 70700170.7 1 •- - ! 1 1 1 . J. ! -------- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- - - - -a I i I r Ir 1 I I Si or ` 4 I I Pa I N I 1 lEGEk1? , 54 01 ° IOW Lars 1 OEM= FIIIS7INC WAV a i j • ' 14 , : I�1- , 1`0- - 1,c --.- KNOICS 0151101: s,w x60 ak I _ N' OEMO16 EilS7PIC 11141.IIY POLE a KNOWS CNISINO C.sl[ WX 16 j 1 1 ? . i I o KNOTES on 160. tnchaw WIN *own ntpwe Iv 7{ TO w"AT 1171E TIKE 15F f"'' ` ! ! 11 PPJVATE DRIVEWAY Onro1a r:sgTOC ncc UW 1 ! I °"— ' / ! 3 r i r SINGLE FAA/ILY TOWNNOAIE DETAIL ' 30• bt I --, . i ^ I _ -•• OEM07E{ [XISIMIG RPCC I ' T '' `'/ 1 j I ..ys / r I .:•�" OCOMM SIX 1001100 W a11c CO16U1TAMif OP *I / »/{4 I O„ 17 ! - ' w ! I 1 1 I r / IIENOTE3 hgTINO EIEYAT10N MARYLAND AVENUE o Nsa'ss 1a c I sae.o� % _ I ......... _ I I l ...•• s , 1 36 • sj. t 36 i 1 p. h ; •'•, I .1 •. s i ! f2 j L Xi r•' ra11 isAt. w - r J � � I m � ;. i r r•. i•.r' ., /r �'b. .tLA '1.s »_ �'�' F � I. ; S •'''' / 1 / r'f ROSEWOOD ESTATES . -'� r;l ; -�--- ' I .i,,p..Ls•. I W1TO6Mw117. I , // A' 'r ' ' I -'sow fYP: {17.2 i \ Jr / ss6MS _ �,` Iov b I , L.. / "' �.� f00EP.1{{.1 ! T � r�..r•i'' r' ' i r• �' \ i _4 !. •• S _ •r i + i 'r r .,' r r \ � , i 1 I r / i��' �,� ./ {^' .} •:y li in. TI O N AREA PARK DEDICA 1 ti > �, �z - ! - 586.07 r te' ! 5` ' { 31 ��- I 1 ,! or AI AJ _1 ; q'/ \ 1 = / ; / I ' shy r' 1 � -� /ri .` �-� '•) ; ••� ,,, � p• 1. 4 � , / � � s +y,• --�"'� 1 j , Iwo t 'F� / t `�„' � ' �? I - _- - -t /T 22 fit to x � /•ate � [v .. L .!!• / % ,/ ��. r . •. _ _.._ . - -,/ � r.' L_ 11ow TIP 40 rtor ■sKO I 1 / �" I � �$ j l � A•a I -. �•� 1 20 s. 4r I •1 T {afNA i ` - f - / �• �f!C , .• s 1 ' � F •_•_- _•__- _.�..•._.... . OWNERS lie 1 ,.w./. ^ r t:y ...� oiaa I PRIVATE DRIVEWAY I ------------ - - - Lome. —_ —_ —_ — — 1 �i •'I F I > ..Ilr'sv<wr,171v1v - I r MAGNOLL4 AVENUE (un�pen ed) y .. (' ,veers I ! 1 4 led ' - -- I; ' I I I ( � t • e11A7s j i i �� 1 I L n DESC1MIp0N a• ,r 7r s !' Ie' Tr r I. •- � - --. ! .. ,: I... -7 • our w, a r M do. [.,w+. Aswr .. O.r..I q Au• lea 2.9" 2 , 1 ar 60 T. PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AA 3G77/S3 r.l Oxm.s to ..Y M. Y w BIA![P ld1C 10y1AW .ct.r4i6 w s1r ,60600 I•. w«.q e..ry. or.««. I>.arn ,1sw Iw of wr, w a am" on .1. or« w. 011. W NON O. N w'o low 4w a A..• 1....I.r. r .>:ao ... a . 4r. 1 112- - 11360 THE Law vtMnwa COU/St 1 902 40" WVC UA WEANING CMOSC 8 !/NIT TOWNHDME DETAIL . .. wsh W / . I.l 4 SAWA 1 . dW~ W 61Y6 r« ti Iw 3.. Hi W ..0 to a Ae. 1. W-V 6.. 4..r -0 w. « oohs 42737 7AC4 COAT 411337 TACO COP/ .N a 66.o ....w.M « 3100 lwt 1. /.. 1...15..60 - 1 ." tw - r 11•R c610f/ OW /Ab. r7OA. ro!C ///l•O/hll ./ IL AW. 1 :...«0.,..41.« a... «.r w t e. N& I« Ar r, 1. lb r - 4104141 TT/I: 3711 HAWK EaulaC r - 62341 T.R 31 1ASC CmArsc - ;ear :wl• =r, ;,� ,, /••■/ At dopory Y Won •u /•6/A•A. er me r Owxr w rimed ..: ;,-, vi,:,;xi*� r,. .w-islo+ WW shot I vows . t r IM/1bT a'1U CLASS 4 AAGGPEI%17C PA3t F - IY/11r11 22t1 CLAES i AAGEACGATC. 3AEC • • F• . - t 6b/ 41560..15 •r 7FYf, j: % w/p.1 / f oM Mbw• OrNr oft do" N IM Ar [ACrt Yr1 NON M 6041.. 7 N t dr. 7 1560../ w .161.. i SAM II Wass .1516. ash ...Ilm iw O - Awl , .. wear .0400 Ion .l .ri!«1 7 swr a I.r. I -• ^._• • . wlrA • f oot a « • rr .'w o o now d 9. of � w rlr S1 7 ...r .r r Aw .+ 4 =JP;i �� � :.i. '� e•'i+1 �1 ' i. =�.ii• • l ; z A- pof OW .e. « I.. /lo.... r.Tr r d JA3 o Ir -0 3s s r 14UO117 KSIGN •Oq2• CONCIVE MUNIF SEEIGM •H12• C9NM'?C �..,. ;4' �'`' Z ra. A.. p l.« .011, ..w r d M afas w « 1I - :.i7lnfi, • ::1:J., • '� A••.• w 060..60, r I J'c,yi'i� 7,_ y: u4l :riCd7.,1 •w'.�r•4. ••... � G cl n D w{ I/TT[0 cuP1 • GuttEP 1875 COMMERCIAL BLVD. ; ,� , 7 STREET SECTION 'B' 061. _L a Awblarn fAw "I M [r Y.Im1.l. AI.... w sr .6060!. v .v..r. 1. �+/ I.r , .,, STREET SECTION 'A' NI}T TO SCALE ANOOVER, MN. 55304 0-i-4: valor tan cv wcsm1 8 a..+Z NOT TO SCALE (763) 862 -3281 SITE PLAN 6 3 /Z -aZ f E Attachment 5 4. 9:33 Beaver Lake Townhomes (Lakewood Drive and Maryland Avenue) A. Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) B. Street Right -Of -Way and Easement Vacations C. Preliminary Plat a. . Assistant City Manager Coleman presented .the report. b. Associate Planner Roberts presented the .specifics of the report. C. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. Councilmember Collins moved to extend the'meeting until all agenda items are addressed Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All d. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling or proponents or opponents, The following g p p pp persons were heard: Laurence Olson, LSJ Engineering, Representing the Developer of Beaver Lake Townhomes Mark Dorling, 1115 Sterling North, Maplewood Kay Peterson, 1085 Mary Street,. Maplewood Margaret Lutfey, 1076 Mary Street, Maplewood .Bob Zick, 1880 E. Shore Drive, Maplewood Kevin Berglund, 1929 Kingston Avenue, Maplewood .. ... Joan Dorling, 1115 Sterling Street North, Maplewood Will Rossbach, 1,386 E. County Road C, Maplewood , Kay Peterson, Second Appearance Mark Dorling, Second Appearance Bob Zick, Second Appearance Kevin Berglund, Second Appearance' e. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Beaver Lake Townhome development on the south side of Maryland Avenue between Sterling Street and Lakewood Drive: RESOLUTION 02 -05 -098 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Tony Emmerich, representing the AJE Companies, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for the Beaver Lake Townhomes residential planned unit development (PUD) WHEREAS, this permit applies to undeveloped property for the Beaver Lake Townhomes PUD south of Maryland Avenue between Sterling _Street and Lakewood Drive in Section 25, Township 9, Ran e 22 Ramsey p g � Y County, Minnesota. (PINS 25- 29 -22 -21 -0010 and 25- 29- 22 -21- 0011.) 13 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 7 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On April 15 2002 the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On May 28, 2002, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave. everyone at the hearing a chance to. speak and present written statements.. The council also considered .reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. The council tabled action on the development request until May 14, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in ' conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3 The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would .not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any erson or property, p- , p p Y because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. :5: The use would generate only minimal vehicular ttaff c"'dh local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6.. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans date- stamped March 12, 2002 except for the following changes: a. Revising the grading and site plans to show: (1) No grading or ground disturbance in the park dedication area and in the wetland and stream buffer areas except: (a) As allowed by the watershed district. (b) For the utilities, trails and footbridge. 14 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 8 (2) The required trails and sidewalks. (3) Revised storm water pond locations and designs as suggested or required by the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards. (4) The developer minimizing the loss or removal of natural vegetation including keeping and protecting the grove of coniferous trees (pines) (an area of natural significance) that is in and near the south side of the stream corridor_ near the rear' of proposed buildings 26 -34. (5) All driveways at least 20 feet wide. If the developer wants to have parking on one side of a driveway, then that driveway must be at least 28 feet wide. (6) All parking stalls with a width of at least nine feet and 'a length of at least 18 feet. b.. The developer deeding the area labeled "Park Dedication" on the lans to the City of Maplewood. .... p Y p This dedication is to help protect the most sensitive natural features on the site and would protect this part of the site from building, fences, mowing, cutting, filling, grading, dumping or other ground p g � disturbances. This dedication also would help ensure the natural linear or corridor aspect of the site (primarily around the stream) main as it is now. The Parks and Recreation Director ' shall approve the -land or the area(s) for dedication to the city. The city shall use the Greenways grant from the DNR, while matching the .state dollars with city open space money, (as is required) to buy the protected area along the stream and wetlands labeled as : Park Dedication on the plan dated March 12,. 2002. The-cty council may approve - major changes to the plans.. The. director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must .be substantially started within one year of council .approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall a. Include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, trails, sidewalks, tree, driveway and parking lot plans. b. Show no grading or ground disturbance (except where utilities or trails are installed) in the: (1) Required wetland and stream buffer areas. (2) Park Dedication area. This land will be for city park and open space purposes. The developer and contractors shall protect the park dedication area including the grove of coniferous trees (pines) (an area of natural significance) that is in and near the south side of the stream corridor, from encroachment from equipment, grading or filling. City- required trails are allowed in the buffer and park dedication areas. c. Include a storm water management plan for the proposal. 15 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 9 d. Include a coordinated plan with the public works department for the design and installation* of the sanitary sewer lines or for the repair or realignment of the existing sanitary sewer line that ' runs through the site. .4. The design of the ponds shall meet Maplewood's design standards and shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. If needed, the developer shall be responsible for getting an off -site and and. p g g Y p d rainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the onds, complete all public im p rovements ' and meet. p p p p all city requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. � �' g c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These si s shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or dumping. d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. e. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands, stream corridor, P ark dedication area and site: = f. Install a six - foot -wide concrete sidewalk along he south side of Maryland Avenue between Sterlin gY g Street and the west property line of the site. The developer's engineer shall show this sidewalk on: the grading and construction plans. The -city engineer shall a rove`�the� detains' of'these ns. pp p Ta g. Construct an eight-foot-wide paved public walkway and two -rails lit -rail fencing in the followin p g g locations: (1) From Private Driveway A in the west side of the site between Lots 8 and 9 to near the stream in the center of the site. (2) From Private Driveway D in the east side of the site,. between Lots 21 and 22 to near the stream in the center of the site. The trail must have a surface that is not impervious when the trail is in a wetland or stream buffer area. The developer's engineer shall design the trails to follow the existing property contours and proposed utility corridors to save as many trees as possible and to minimize the amount of grading necessary to install the trails. h. Restore all disturbed. areas within the stream corridor and park dedication area with a native seed mix approved by the watershed district and by the city engineer. 6. * The developer shall give the city wetland easements over the wetlands and the stream. The easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surroundin g a wetland. The easements also shall cover the stream and any land within 50 feet of the top of the stream bank. These easements shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within fifty feet of the wetland and the stream or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to p rotect 16 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 10 the water quality of the wetlands and the stream from: fertilizer and to protect the wetland and stream habitat from encroachment. 7. The approved setbacks for the principal structures in the Beaver Lake Townhome PUD shall be: a. Front -yard setback (from a private driveway): minimum - 20 feet, maximum - 35 feet b. Front -yard setback (public side street): minimum - 25 feet, maximum - 40 feet c. Rear -yard setback: none d. Side -yard setback (town houses): minim - 5 feet to a property line and 10 feet minimum between buildings i .: . e. Side yard setbacks (apartments): 20 feet minimum between buildings g 8.- This approval does. not include the design approval for the townhomes or for the apartments. The p .. project design plans, including architectural, site lighting, tree and landsca in plans, shall be P gp subject to review and approval of the community design review board (CDRB). The projects shall be subject to the following conditions: a. Meeting all conditions and changes as required by the city council. b. The buildings in the. shoreland district shall have a maximum height of 25 feet (unless the g cit council approves taller structures). _...: . c. The developer shall design the structures to reduce their visibility from the lake. This shall include using vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color or other means to accomplish the screening. The city may require additional vegetation to help screen these- facilities. d. For the driveways: ,(1) Minimum width - 20 feet. (2) Maximum width - 28 feet. (3) All driveways less than 28 feet in width shall be osted for "No Parking',' on both sides. p g Driveways at least 28 feet wide may have parking on one side and shall be posted for no parking on one side. e. Showing all changes required b the city as art of the conditional use ermit for the planned unit q Y Y p p p development (PUD). 9. The city shall not issue any building permits for construction on an outlot (per city code requirements). The developer must record a final plat to create buildable lots for any outlot in the preliminary plat before the city will issue a building permit. 10. The developer paying the city $94,000 in Park Availability Charges (PAC fees) fQr this development. 17. City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 11. The city. council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Councilmember Kopp en moved to ado t the followin g resolution 'a rovin a street ri ht -of wa v and_ easement vacations for the Beaver Lake Townhomes Lakewood. Drive and Ma land Avenue .: RESOLUTION 02 -05 -099 STREET RIGHT -OF -'SAY VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Tony Emmerich, representing the AJE . Companies, a lied for the vacation of the following g described street right -of -ways: 1. That part of the Sterling. Street right -of -way as a roadway easement according to the document filed with Ramsey County lying within the West 25 feet of the East 58 feet of Lot 5, Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition. 2. Shat ,part of Magnolia Avenue .(formerly known as Cherry venue as Tatted in Beaver Lake Addi ' y'Y ) p tlon lying'between the. east right -of -way line of Lakewood Drive (the west line of Lot 8, Block 2 Beaver Lake Addition extended south) and the east property line of Lot 7, Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition extended south. All in Section. 25, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey Count g Y y WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows: 1. On April 15, 2002, the planning commission recommended' that the ci ty pp council approve these street vacations. 2. On May 28, 2002, the city council held a ublic hearing. City staff published a notice in the 'Ma lewood P g y p p Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. The council tabled action on the development request until May 14, 2001. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: 1. Lot 5, Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition (PIN 25- 29 -22 -21 -0010) 2. Lots 7 and 8, Block 2 Beaver Lake Addition (PIN 25- 29 -22 -21 -0011 3. The North 161.83 feet of the West 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 subject to roads of Section 25 Township 29, Range 22 (1070 Lakewood Drive North) (PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0072) 4. Except the North 290.66 feet of the West 1/2 North 677.06 feet of the West 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 (Subject to roads and easement) in SEC 25, TN 29, RN 22 ( PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0073 All in Section 25, Township 29 Range 22, Maplewood, Ramse y County, Minnesota. 12 18 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above - described vacation since it is in the public interest based on the following reasons: L. The adjacent properties have adequate street access. 2. These right -of -ways are not needed for the public purpose of street construction. 3. The developer will be building private streets and driveways in the project. RESOLUTION 02 -05 -100 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION WHER.EAS,, Mr. Tony Emmerich, representing the AJE Companies, applied for the vacation of the following- p pP - g described easements: That part of the following sanitary sewer easement according to document number 15044841 lying within Lots 7 and 8. Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition, described as follows: Beginning on the. West line of the Northeast uarter of the Northwest uarter, of Section '25 Township 29' q q � P Range 22, a distance of 603 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Northeast quarter of Northwest quarter; thence East 153 feet; thence South 185 feet;. thence South 85 de ees,. 03. minutes. East 172.9 feet; thence South 1 degree 38 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 80 feet; thence South 88 degrees 21 minutes, 30 seconds East a distance, of 170.2 feet more or less to a point. on the. West line of the 50 foot sewer easement hereinafter described all of the foregoing being over Lot 8, Block l and Lots 7 and 8 Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition. All lying south of Maryland Avenue and between Lakewood Drive and Sterlin g Street in Section 25 - Towns . p 29, Range 22, Maplewood, Minnesota,--'- WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On April 15, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve these vacations. 2. On May 28, 2002; the, city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the lewood Ma g tY p p Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations p . from the city staff and planning commission. The council tabled action on the development request until May 14, 2001. WHEREAS, after the city approves these vacations, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting property: Lot 8, Block 1, Beaver Lake Addition and Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Beaver Lake Addition (PIN 25-29-22-21 - 0011) All in Section 25, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city approve council a rove the. above - described vacations for the following reasons.: 1 It is in the public interest. 19 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 13 2 . The city and the adjacent property owners have no plans to build a street or utilities in these locations. 3 . The adjacent properties have access to public - streets and utilities. Seconded by Councilmember Collins A yes -All y Councilmember Koppen moved to ado t the relimina p lat for Beaver Lake Townhome development ?� p ry p on the south side of Maryland Avenue between Sterling Street and Lakewood Drive. The developer shall complete the following before the city council approves the final plat• 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all ci . p p p requirements. b:: * Place temporary. orange safety fencing and signs at the adin limits. �' g c. Have Xcel Energy nstall Group _ ' gy G p V rate street lights In at least 15 locations primarily at street and driveway intersections and street or driveway curves. The exact style and location shall be sub'ect to the. city engineer's approval. d. Pay the city for the cost of traffic- control, street identification and no parking signs. p � -x, e - .Provide all required and necessary easements. L Cap, seal and abandon any wells that may be on the site, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. � g g. Complete and replace as necessary all curb and gutter on Sterling Street- and on Maryland Avenue. This is to replace the existing driveways and driveway aprons on these streets. This shall include the repair of the pavement and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards. h. For the trails and sidewalks, complete the following: (1) Construct an eight - foot-wide paved public walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing in the following locations: a. From Private Drive A in the west side of the site between Lots 8 and 9 to near the stream in the center of the site.. b. From Private Drive D in the east side of the site, between Lots 21 and 22 to near the stream. All trails between lots shall be in a publicly -owned pedestrian way or outlot. (2) The developer also shall build asix- foot -wide sidewalk along the south side of Maryland Avenue between Sterling Street and the west property line of the site. 20 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 14 (3) The developer shall install atwo -rail split -rail fence on both sides of each trail and posts at the end of the trails to prevent motorized vehicles from using the trail (4) The developer shall build the trails, sidewalks and fencing with the driveways and streets before the city approves a final plat. (5) The city engineer must approve these plans. i. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland and stream buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing,. vegetation cutting, filling, grading or dumping beyond this point. City staff shall approve the- sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city ssues buildin permits Y gp in this plat. J. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. k. Install survey monuments . and signs along the edges of the area labeled "Park Dedication." These signs shall explain that the area beyond the. signs is a public ark p . area and that there shall be no building, fences, mowing, cutting, f lling, dumping or other ground disturbance in that area. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city issues building permits- in this p lat, 1. Install signs where the driveways for the apartments and for the town houses intersect the public streets indicating that they are private driveways. 2. * Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering fans. These plans shall � gp p include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk, driveway and street plans. The plans shall.meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: (1) The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each building site: The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. - (3} Building pads that reduce the grading on site where the developer can save large trees. 21 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 15 (4) The street, driveway and trail grades as allowed by the city engineer. (5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans, The city engineer shall approve the plans, specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. On slopes steeper than 3:1, the developer shall prepare and implement a stabilization and planting plan. These slopes shall be protected with wood fiber blanket, be seeded with a no- maintenance vegetation and be stabilized before the city approves the final plat. (6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than four feet require a building permit from the city. The developer shall install a protective rail or fence on top of any retaining wall that is taller than four feet. (7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. (8) No grading beyond the plat' boundary without temporary grading easements from the affected property. owner(s). (9) Additional information -for the property south of the project site. This shall include elevations of the existing ditch, culverts and catch basins and enough*''. information about the storm water flow path from the proposed ponds. (10) Emergency overflows between Lots 8 and 9 Lots 21 and 22 and south of proposed building 42 (out of proposed ponds 1, 3 and 4). The overflow swales shall be protected with permanent sail - stabilization blankets. (11) Restoration in the stream corridor and park dedication area being done with native seed mix or vegetation as approved by the city engineer and by the watershed district. C.* The tree plan shall: . (1) Be approved, along with the landscaping, by the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) before site grading or final plat approval (2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees. This plan_ shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. 22 City Council fleeting 05 -28 -02 16 (3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement and screening trees. The deciduous trees shall be at least two and one half (2% inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, ash, lindens, sugar maples or other native species. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall. be amix of Black Hills Spruce, Austrian pine and other species. (4) Show no tree removal in the buffer zones, park dedication areas or beyond the approved grading roved adin and tree limits. (5) Include for city staff a detailed tree planting plan and material list. (6) Group the new trees together. These planting areas shall be: (a) near the ponding areas (b) on - the slopes (c) along the trails (d) along the east side of Lakewood Drive to screen the proposed buildings from Beaver Lake (e) along the south side of the site (west of Sterling Street) to screen the development from the existing house to the south The developer may use the tree groupings to separate the different types of residences. (7) Show the planting of at least 270 trees after the site grading is done. d. The street, trail, sidewalk and utility plans shall show: (1) An eight- foot -wide paved public walkway and two -rail split -rail fencing in the following locations: a. From Private Drive A in the west side of the site between Lots 8 and 9 to near the stream in the center of the site. b. From Private Drive D in the east side of the site, between Lots 21 and 22 to near the stream. The parks and recreation director shall approve their locations and design. (2) The public streets and driveways shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two percent. 23 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 17 (3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter except where the city engineer decides that it is not needed for drainage purposes.. (4) The removal of the unused driveways and driveway aprons and the completion of the curb and gutter on Sterling Street and on Maryland Avenue and the restoration and sodding of the boulevards. (S) The coordination of the water main locations, alignments and sizing with the standards and requirements of the Saint Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS). Fire flow requirements and hydrant locations shall be verified with the Maplewood Fire Department. (6) All utility excavations located within the proposed right-of-ways or within easements. The developer shall acquire easements for all utilities that would be outside the project area. (7) The plan and profiles of the proposed utilities. (8) Details of the ponds and the pond. outlets. The outlets shall be protected to prevent erosion. (9). A coordinated sewer realignment and reconstruction plan. The city engineer must approve the sanitary sewer realignment plans. (10) A _six- foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the south side of Maryland Avenue between Sterling Street and the west property line of the site. e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run- off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. The developer's engineer shall: (1) Verify inlet and pipe capacities. (2) Have the city engineer verify the drainage design calculations. 3. Pay the costs related to the engineering department's review of the construction plans. 4. Change the plat as follows: a: Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. b. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the watershed district 24 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 18 c. Show the park dedication boundary and area on the final plat. d. Make as many of the property lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul -de -sacs or perpendicular to the driveways and street right -of -ways. e. Show street names for the driveways as follows: (1) Private Driveway Ain the west one -half of the. site shall be called "Beaver Creek Parkway." (2) Private Driveway B in the west one -half of the site shall be called. "Beaver Creek Lane." (3) Private Driveway D in the east one -half of the site shall be called "Sterling Circle." (4) Private Driveway E in the east one -half of the site shall be called "Sterling Lane." f. Show the existing pipelines and pipeline' easements on the final lat. _ p g. If necessary, increase the lot widths for the lots next to the pipeline to ensure that the building pads will be at least 100 feet away from the pipeline. (code requirement) - h. Label the common areas ' as outlots. J. Show the trails in publicly owned property or easements. p Y j . Show the area between buildings '8 and 9 and buildings 21 and 22 as se agate outlots g p and dedicate each of these to the city. 5. Secure and provide all required easements for the development. These shall .include: a. Any off -site drainage and easements. _ b. wetland and stream easements over the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a wetland and a stream. The easement shall prohibit any buildin g or structures within 50 feet of the wetland or stream or any mowing, cutting, filling, grading or dumping within 50 feet of the stream, wetland or within the wetland itself. c. A stream buffer easement that is at least 50 feet wide on each side of the stream that crosses the site. The easement shall prohibit any building, structures or any mowing, filling, cutting, grading or dumping within 50 feet of the ordinary high water mark g (OHWM) of the stream. 25 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 19 The purpose of these easements is to protect the water quality of the stream and wetlands .from fertilizer and runoff. They also are to protect the stream and wetland habitat from encroachment. d. Any easements the city needs for the realignment of the sanitary sewer through the site. 6. Sign a developer's agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor Will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b. *Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Provide for the repair of Lakewood Drive, Maryland Avenue and Sterling Street (street, curb and gutter and boulevard) after the developer connects to the public utilities and builds the driveways: d. Work with the city as necessary for the realignment of the sanitary sewer through the site. This sewer project also will require an assessment. agreement between the f developer and, the city . to compensate the city for the benefit- that. the developer receives from the city sewer construction. 7. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowners' association. documents. b. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any additional driveways (besides the one new driveway shown on the project plans) from going onto Lakewood Drive and onto Maryland Avenue. c. A deed restriction prohibiting the. construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. This affects Lots 1 through 3, Lots 19 through 24 and buildings 41 and 42 of the proposed preliminary plan the city received on March 12, 2002. The developer also shall notify the purchasers of the pipeline location. d: A deed dedicating a stream buffer easement (50 feet from the top of each stream bank) for the stream that crosses the site. e. Deeds for the stream and wetland buffer easements surrounding the stream and the wetlands. 26 City. Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 20 f. A covenant or deed restriction that prohibits any further subdivision or splitting of the lots or parcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by the.city council. g. A deed that transfers the ownership of the park dedication area to Maplewood. h. Deeds that transfer the ownership of the outlots between buildings 8 and 9 and buildings .21 and 22 to the city. The applicant shall- submit the language for these dedications and restrictions to the city for approval before recording. 8. Submit the homeowners' association bylaws and rules to the Director of Community Development. These are to assure that there will be one responsible party for the maintenance of the private utilities, driveways and structures. 9. Show the wetland boundaries on the plat as approved by the Watershed District. A trained and qualified person must. delineate the `wetlands. This person shall prepare a wetland delineation report: The developer shall submit this wetland information to the Watershed District office . The, Watershed District must approve this information before the city approves a - final plat. If needed, the developer shall change the plat to meet wetland regulations. 10. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and: overall site drainage. The city engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the .developer or contractor has. not completed before: final plat approval. 11. Obtain a. permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District for grading. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the director of community development may waive. any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must. complete these conditions before,the city issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. f Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Collins, Kopp en, W asi luk Nays- Councilmember Juenemann Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution approving the on street parkinY standards for the Beaver Lake Townhome development: RESOLUTION 02 -05 -101 NO PARKING RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood has approved a residential PUD and preliminary plat known as Beaver. Lake Townhomes. WHEREAS, the developer wants to have reduced. street right -of -way widths, reduced street pavement widths and reduced private driveway widths in this development. City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 27 21 street right-of-way widths, reduced street pavement widths and WHEREAS, the city has approved reduced s g y , reduced driveway p widths in-the develo meet, subject to on- street parking restrictions. de allows variations from the city code standards WHEREAS, Section 29 52(b) of the city co Y if they do not affect the g eneral purpose of the city code. _ RESOLVED that Maplewood prohibits-the parking of motor NOW, THEREFORE, IT vehicles on both sides o p IS HEREBY p p f all public streets and driveways less than 28 feet wide and prohibits parking on one side of th e p Y public streets and driveways that are 28 feet to 32 feet wide in the Beaver Lake Townhome PUD South of Maryland Avenue between Sterling Street and Lakewood Drive in Section 25- 29 -22. Seconded by Councllmemb er Collins ollins es- Mayor. Cardinal, Councilmembers Y Collins, W asiluk, Kopp en Nays - Councllmember Juenemann authorize cit staff to s end u to $400 of the open s ace funds Councllmember Koppen moved to a v pp 000. for the 8. acres which would include the $150-100 matching ant form the DNR G reenwa s Pro am. o Staff wa also directed t make. the. develo p er aware that the cit would like to see his artici ation in . the open space pro gram. :Seconded by Councllm ' ember Collins Ayes -All I. AWARD of BIDS None J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None K. NEW BUSIN icense -Nico Kotso oulos -Mama Mia' -3094 White Bear Avenue 1. Intoxicating Liqu p a. Assistant City Manager Co an presented the staf eport. b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented the s ifics o he report. C.- The following person was heard: Nico Kotsopoulos, Owner, Mama Mi ' 3094 White Bear. A ue, Maplewood Joanne Kotso oulos, Mama Mia's 94 White Bear Avenue, Ma ewood p Councllmember Kopp en m ed to approve the intoxicatiniz and Sundgy or license a lications for Nico Kotso oulos for a Mia's located at 3094 White Bear Avenue. Seconded by C cilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All 28 City Council Meeting 05 -28 -02 22 Agenda # MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Final Plat PROJECT: Towns of New Century Third Addition .DATE: March 14, 2003 INTRODUCTION Action by Council .Date En&)rsed Modified Dejected -....4 Scott Hintermeister is requesting that the city council approve the Towns of New Century Third Addition final plat. Mr. Hintermeister represents the builder, New Century County Homes LLC. This final plat is for the third phase of the.town houses for the New Century development, and will create 29 lots for town houses. This plat will be east of New Century Boulevard, north of Highwood Avenue and south ' of New Century Lane. (See the maps on pages 3 -.6.) BACKGROUND On July 12, 1999, the city council made several approvals for the New Century PUD. These included changes to the comprehensive plan, a conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) for a 178 -unit housing development and street right -of -way and easement vacations. The approvals also included a code variation for a substandard cul -de -sac, reduced building setbacks for the existing. houses at 2610 and 2611 Schaller Drive, a variation. from the city .code to reduce the required street right -of -way width, a variation from the city code to reduce the required street pavement width, a preliminary plat to create the lots in the development; having no parking for both sides of some of the streets and no parking for one side of other streets. Can January 24, 2000, the city council approved the first final plat for the New Century development. This final plat created, 80 lots for houses, 3 outlots for open space and one outlot for future phases of the development (including the town houses). On May 23, 2000, the community design review board (CDRB) approved the project plans for the New Century Town Homes. This approval was for the site, building and landscape plans and was subject to eight . conditions. (See the site plan on page 6.) On-August 14, 2000, the city council approved the Towns of New Century final plat. This plat created the first 30 town house lots in the New Century PUD. On July 22, 2002, the city council approved the Towns of New Century Second Addition final plat. This plat created 22 lots for town houses in the New Century PUD. DISCUSSION The developer is progressing with this phase of the plat. The contractor has installed the utilities and has completed the rough grading in this part of the development. The developer has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION A rove the final plat for the Towns of New Century Third Addition. This approval is subject to the pp county recording the deeds, deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. P :secl 3 28 /newcen townhouses T d .doc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4. Site Plan . 5. 7 -12 -99 Council Minutes 6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment) 2 Attachment"'. I Ll ' . 1 -- LaNOIIV LN. 1-5 rn er mew ' PQ N D �� w 1N p'�A`� ° MARY 14 ' � KIN ST O'DAY ¢ T. . MAILAND CIR. ° - - UO3 ce 0 a 1. CRESTAEW G3 MCIland d Vldta H�Oa Z z FOREST TEAK.. 0 Pnrlc Park n DR. }— WOOD p TEAI4VOQG DR. 1. 2 ' 2. DEER RIDGE C CT. Y �n E.N. QAKRIDGE DR. 1 6 a HILLWOCtD. — 2. DR. HI OA Oc t 0 1. C l! z 1 SP �' z C25) H NTINGTQN CT. Rf U w � � �JCS�QE 2. OAKRlDGE LN. 4 R. LINW000 v �. AVE. 720S' ----- . oQ ,vAL AVE. UN I O O � a • • 0 RO MON7 0 0 v zo � ~ '' { SVID a ° O 4 �r a` SP ER 16 +� v CIR. T IMBER WHITE DRl TIMt3ER TR © LER DR. 7 1 7 g R W CT. T1l�A � z 5 �• tr ' PH'YLIS CT. c,3 A QR v P. NE DR. PL ' 2 NEW CENTURY TER 1. CURRIE CT. R AUEY � V LLEY \AEW AVE. 3 LryV CENTURY t.tV 11711 2. VALLEY VIEW CT. ��'�k 3. LAKEWOOD . CT. �. AV. 3. 1,74) 1. 2- WIGHW?QD 'J b0,": iro 1200S 19 1440S OVERL00 CIR. LF /c ��s C arver Lake Z 7 . w cf) c D ro 19 LOCATION MAP 3 4 N a l _ RAMIE a AVE 0 tv z EMITS Z z 0 � C six AVE. 0 SOUTHCREST cn REST (w, Plaownivfaw SnUTH O+W HEIGHTS CT. Pork U MOR o CT. �,. A,. 5N 0 (1 BOXWOOD AVE. z � z 608 a: .0 4 . ° 711 CARVER AE. Attachment 2 ►RIVE �N CN 6 CRUZE 3 .64 AC. n2 1 ° ^, 124.79' 124.A - 14 1 O V 0 9 � �* ' � Na .Z n3 �.� .5 _6 � 71 R 41 ; :'off '°�"'; 4 °" — — _ _ m O ESUT LOT D 4A r'� a�u�rAc��wn ununr f rys ` W OUT 2e s 5326 3 Z6 34 � ae .3 7 c (13.0 - Cl + n3s) i 1.92 AC . pl7J +y t �w o o v� ~ s (133) 12 ^f �`� 9 ^ 8 w 7 �b t7it a36) . 74.91 + p Jzj �E t d 32) � fS ." 1 _1p 1& r 3 yt - 25.5 25 3 .3 73 t� (� Z CIC Na 404 w 3 , ' 29 ' V OUTLOT A t _7s f.1S7 C � 6 046) � v- AC. •9 99.83 55.70 �p °� 04J S 16.60 f 13 ) ' 14 .O1 I- g1 N 1 TOWNS } 60 34373 8 CFC NQ 4*4 _c } 2.47 i1C: 143;D7 n� t ti171 __ _ o LOT B G O 1 • �/ QO ' 33' o , fsBJ _ - _ n4� �� ` _ t1U Ln I" I it 74.5 Is - 0 `!Q A U o Q • . 11 � �� Q,Q Go 12 10 CA 170' 33' 155.50 "' 134 bD °' 60 536.6' --T HIGHWOOD AVENUE --- zsa' - - ; w r...� �wr�..� +rw .o.+r -u i 76.88' N *=I a !�" 173' l0i' 62 1 40 , 2!V 1.57 2f 174J Cr 40'' ? 35.61 ; h21 Z; N S' 76' 1 16S') f1J PROPERTY LINE MAP a t Attachmnt 3 ri �T N FW CENTURY O C40 Aj 9<1 ir Ir 0. 41 4 ...__ 0 99 6 c ?5 co .. 141 G j s �Zys 45 �8 S =4• 14 �0 4 fa 1 oft 1 . V �,�. w 1 e ?sue ``' ����� 4S ` N t �' '` °- S7 0'Tg `f} S81'33• -.l , 91 q 4 0 E �.. ry / 9 2 i O i 1St . h 96.71 � h / So33• i ; 9 3 p /a i a 'o 116.09 N88.57.1 . . . � J ti 9 .92 � wi t. j Z �0 2 a�oJ c i J N I. 5 � 0 6 I 1 I •� 103.13 = � N j c J I. l ,n ~' 54.75 I M 5 V N/ X1.3 "E f J ;� a I 588 ° � 1 1 a I.zs .7 I - - �j - 1 -- ..' 69 J N j J� Q : o 57'17 - E cw 54.73 0 2 w E 12 - -`-�.. ' J o o N88 4 97 aw + � p Q : ; E uta,t "' Q l o J 61.22 '� n 54. o n C.3 .\: �... _ . I`� M6 00'02w 1 c N88'ST1 TE N88'ST17`E� o �; cr. k A� 84.99 - ` 36.94 J °o . I 3 5 'q o - o 9 Q Q 38.80 37, 01 -1 r 61.20 r 54.68 C4 b _ ( I cc. J `4. in N88'57'17 E w • '- � a .ao 5 I 3; N88'S� 17 E. N88 1 E a I in i n ``' J � a N88'S7 17 E I :� c I Z 54.65 (C' m 1 I 61.17 0 88.5717 - - '�) j cv 75.16 I 2 i S885 - W ^ 1 I, N88 - E I c r 54.63 (4 i �- -- J w in 3 W ''t• 2 N88'57't 7"E H 75.06 I t H _ h I ' ,� - I D i 58857 7 12 O c I I W �' - i o I L. I � ' � 61.12 54.59 - 0 cr 74.96 Z '� I �O N88'S7.17wE 115.71 S88 - W � . • {:.. 1 I J ! 60 N I �, OUTLOT A ttit t0l 74.8 L ��.� w - - - - -. - �orv7sJ'w : _ N88 E �.1 i 77 i?•5'3i� ° „ OWNS NEW 2N0 A00. 3 2nHIGHWOOD AVENUE _ cy- HIG 000 ES TE I N . N0. 3 I . PROPOSED FINAL PLAT TOWNS OF NEW CENTURY. 3RD ADDITION Q N 5 Attachment 4 PROPOSED NEW CENTURY FUTURE PHASE OF TOWN HOMES MULTI - FAMILY ��� : /fir ,�, �t..y_" � "��',� a� .!, ,. +••- - -e9. .: '` �' /�. - r - - ./�• .;_ , �� ° Y�_�� 1 � ' t . IL - `/ �..•If! rs�' '`�'-'� A�'u ` � t ,•, ! ( � : •/ � 1 1 � I 'ty� -- - _ ;�• I• t �E ' ; c. —��1 � � � ., 1 I 1 ); .'' i 'i �, � a / lya.i :l I ' ..r�_.._qe � • �,�•;,�t.� —� �., �1.�_ �. :..=. =: ��� ,'�N:...} � 'r / 1 J� J � J• / l I .-- ••-, -• '�,ts..• —• -'�• l� r � �•• � ...... � ._. � 'i 1. .i /i �� '• `S 01ITL T • D. G i 0 ILI illwl:l (11410 1. PA ON � - _ •! •,1 � • � i '' ' r � O . .� �' ; !}�' ` `It •. �f, - '�` ..J �. � , � f � .v•r••r EO ` ••• -• _ - •'', /� ' . ..1 ii. �: t � one 1 • I t . c • / . • �', -- •-n'.. �.. r r � � .� � .�. ) � is aT .`: �' //' ' i . �' � �•- -_ " � `rpa i � ` � � 14L / 4� � �� ! T, M'' y j ., �,_ _...� • � • `: •1 .. I -- .� � t `�•�•� �•• '�' ! I r '"7G •' �•� �j f � � , f• ' l i , • �I'L -y� '•'�:. 1�. ...__. � ._..t... .T._ ...�:.� _ �j�� ''. 1 . / • � ... � -- .. i ice_ Jj r ` � �< 1 "fie'" �/ ` � a . ! M•• � � I 1 I � ' 1 1 — - — ". _ •• �• • • �� , . • 1 r E I �E � t _ �� . tom, _ �t _ l�' _ 'YII.? * fie, d�• �1?:. 1 .... vl _ HIGHWOOD AVENUE 4 N Attachment 5 MINUTES NLkPLEW ooD CITY COUNC IL 7:00 P.M., Monday July 12 1999 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting Ito. 99 -15 .J. UNFIr4ISHED BUSINESS 1. New Century PtJD (Highwood and Century Avenues) 4 votes _ comprehensive Plan Changes - ( • t Development . P - Conditional Use Permit for Planned U Street Right -of -Way Vacations Easement Vacations Co - de Variation - Street Right -of -Way Width - Code Variation - Street Pavement Wid - Preliminary Plat No Parking on Streets - E Start of Construction of Model Homes a. Manager McGu introduced the staff report. b. Assoc iate Planner Ken Roberts presented the specifics of the report . posed b the council since this was not a Mayor Rossbach move to allow the developer to answer questions po y public hearing. • Carlson- Ayes -all Seconded by Councllmember C • anies for'hlew Century Development architect resenting the Robert Engstrom Comp C. Jack Buxell, representing answered d uestions posed by the Council. • a resolution for the Comprehensive Plan change- Councllmember Klttrdlge Introduced ' embers Carlson, K.ittrdige, and ' Ayes '110 Councllm Seconded by Councllmember Carlson Allensp ach N ays - Ma .Rossbach & Councilmember Kopper � a or y y MOTION FAILED - • r the Comprehensive Plan Change. . Rossbach moved to reconsider the vote for p . Mayor Ayes - Councl ' lm embers Carlson, Kittridge, and Seconded by Carlson s ach Ma Allen p or Rossbach y Nays - Councilmember Koppen 7 -12 -99 7 . an for the N Century residential ossbach introduced the following changing the land use p Mayor R orn - north o i woo Ave nue, west o ent venue. These c ang development, are ment, no g P . _ s ace to - singe we ings , ntia ensity a n open p an (open (res d wellings) so ro s t e aerie minor co ector street etween a east en o c a rne, or a site. is reso utian a .p p. - nve and Avenuelp 99 -47 -ass LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION ' land use Ian from R -1 (single dwellings) and OS WHEREAS, Robert Engstrom proposed changes to the city's P _ space) and R -3H (residential. high density). o en space) to R-1 (single dwelling s }, to OS (open P UD north of Hi - hwood Avenue and west of WHEREAS, this cha applies to property for the New Century P g Century A ve n ue in Section 13, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the applicant also requested a g • change the land use plan to drop the planned minor collector street . . between the east end of Schaller Drive and Century Avenue. V►THEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: • held a public hearin .The city staff published a hearing 1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission h p _ g Si�� notice; to the surrounding property owners. The planning, notice in the Maplewood Review an 4 :: � -C to sp a': and p.. sent wntte s tatements. The con,,". _isci� n gave eve ,-;,pane at fhc hearinn- $N k;h< < < ended that the city council.not approve the plan amendment. planning commission recomm e proposed land use plan change. They considered 2. On June 28, 1999, the city council discussed th p p ON . P reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city -sta . • ered the 'proposed land use plan changes. ro 3. On Jul 12, 1999, the city council again consid p p July _ ' rove the above - described change for HEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the city council app MOW, T , the following reasons: - ' with the Dais and objectives of the comprehensive plan. 1. The development would be consistent g • cons istent with the city's policies for high - density 's town hous e. site in the development is proper for and cons tY P . 2. This residential use. This includes: nd prop osed low density residential and commercial a. Creating. a transitional land use between the existing p p land uses. b. It is on a collector street and -is near an arterial street, parks and open space. will minimize an adverse effects on surroun properties because: 3. This development Y _ ding ' setback from the street will separate the town houses from nearby a. The proposed on-site pond and large s si homes. 0 13 7 -12 -99 b. Studies have shown there will be no adverse effect on property values. c. There would be,.no traffic from this development on existing local residential streets. The city nor the, deve Ian to build the proposed collector street between the east.end of Schaller Drive 4. Th ty p p P . � .._._. �►._...,.,... �..._....�... +�,A av,; ,S +;nrT %Tr ^f1•jM,.4C a t4 f u.n:.,1A rriake it difficult to build a street in this a � L .CtILA.L[ + 11. VC11L1G UL.LrCILLJb Lll`: v.Ai.yLlll� •I v�lY�a�+.r ♦►r:v w vvv •• •• �•� • ++ - -- area. er Kittrdi e Ayes - May or Rossbach, Cou ncilmembers. Seconded by Counc�lmernb g Y Y Allenspachi Kittridge, Carlson Days - Councilmember Koppers Councllm. ember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution approving a conditional use permit for a planned unit develo ment or the . ew . entury housing development. e city 'bases, this app on the endings P � P required by co e. 99 -07 -056 CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing resenting the Robert Engstrom Companies, applied for a conditional use g permit (CUP) for .the New Century residential planned unit development (PUD). ` this change applies to undeveloped property for the New Century PUD north of Highwood WHEREAS, g pp P P P Y Avenue and west of Century Avenue- in Section 13, Township 28,. Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PINS � 13- 28 -22 -11 -0008 0015 0014 , 0013 and 0022, 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018, 0019, 0020 and 0021.) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On June 7, 1999, the planning commission recommended that the city.council approve this permit. 2. On'June 28, 1999, the city council.held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and. sent notices to the surrounding property ovmers. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission: 3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request. MOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located,designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that 9 7 -12 -99 14 would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property,.,. because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,. water or air pollution, drainage, water run - off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. The use would generate only minimal vehicular on local streets and would not create traffic S. g Y congestion or unsafe access on existing or_proposed streets. V 6. Th use would be served b adeq public facilities and services, including streets, police and, fire protection-, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parrs. 7 The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or .services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal. adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: . All construction shall follow the Tans date- stamped March 29, 1999, the revised grading plans 1 P ., dated May 24, 1999 and the revised plat plans dated July 7, 1999, except where the city requires city es chap . The ci council may approve major changes. The director of community development g may approve minor changes. 2. The ro osed construction must be substantially started within. one year of council approval or the P P permit shall end. The council may extend this for one year. 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: gr ading, utili , draina e, erosion control, tree and driveway and parking lot plans. &�' g� ty g 4. The design of the ponds shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall give P ive the city an easement for this and and shall be responsible forgetting any needed off, site pond and drainage easements. 5. The developer or contractor shall: a. gr Complete all adin for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and P g meet all city requirements. ty fencing and signs at the grading limits. b.* Place temporary orange safe c. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These. signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or dumping. d. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. e. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands and. site. 6.* The developer shall give the city wetland easements over the wetlands. The easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a wetland These easements shall prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within twenty feet of the wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from 7 -12 -99 15 10 fertilizer and to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment. the PUD may have one mother - in-law (accessory) apartment 7. The owners of the single dwellings in Y . w. t.h their.nrooerty. Such accessory units shall be subject to the following: a. Such accessary units may be occupied by one or two persons. its shall not be more than b. The accessory units n 800 square feet' . hi for tax or identification purposes of the c. The city will not allow separate or different ownership accessory unit from the primary residence. ' d. The owners shall only rent their accessory units to those related by blood or marriage. structures in the New Century PUD shall be: 8. The approved setbacks for the principal . 1. Front yard setback: minimum - 20 feet, maximum - 50 feet F ront and setback ( side street): minimum -1 2. F 5 feet, maximum - 30 feet y 3. Rear yard setback: minimum - 30 feet, maximum -none 4. Side Y and setback:. as the zoning code requires include final design approval for the duplexes, townhomes or for the village 9. This approval does not inc � pp s for these to the The developer shall submit the final building, landscaping and site plan green. p a community design review board �CDRB for pp royal by the CDRB. 10. The cit council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Kittrdige Ayes - Councilmernbers Allenspach, Kittrdige, & Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppers • approve the following Councilmember Carlson moved to appro g resolution vacating parts of the unused Tim Avenue, Ph llis venue in no o ig woo venue an .vest o entury venue in the Niayhill Road and y Y g entu PUD ass own on the map on page 63 o eve opers app ication materials). rY 99 -07 -057 STREET RIGHT - - WAY VACATION RESOLUTION e Robert En gstrom Companies, applied for the WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing th e g p vacation g • n of the following described street right -of -ways: 114 of Section 13, Township 28, Range. 22, Ramsey 1. The south 30 feet of the NE 1/4 of NE „ County, Minn esota t the east 288.17 feet. (Tim Avenue) except 11 16 7 -12 -99 2. The east and north 30 feet of the east 343.60 feet of the east two- thirds of the west 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. I ply li_s Avenue A. BERG ADDITION. aww That art of and that part of Mayhill Road lying Ma hill Road in A. BERG ADDITION 4. p y . between Tim Avenue and the north right -of -way line of Highwood Avenue. 5. The south 60 feet of the north 190 feet of the west third of the west three - quarters of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 13, .Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 in Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows: � planning On June 7 1999 the lannin commission recommended that the city council approve these street vacations. 2. On June 28, 1999, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the Ma lewood� Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners. The Council gave P everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and. present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. 3.. On Jul y 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: 1. Lots 1, 7, and Lots 8 -14, A. BERG ADDITION. 2. Except the North 657 feet and Except the South 243 feet of the North 900 feet of the east 240 feet and except the east 288.17 feet of the part South of the North 900 feet, the East '/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1 /4 Sub' ect to Road) in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 (PITT 13 -2 8 -22 -11 -0013 ) ( J 3. The-SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to Road) in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22 (PIN 13- 28 -22 -11 -0014) 4. Subject to Roads; the East 343.6 feet of the West 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, , Townshi .28 Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0019) P g 5. Except the South 657 feet; The west 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0024) All in Section 13 Townshi p 28, Range 22, Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota. 12 7 -12 -99 17 NOW, THERE FORE , BE IT RESOLVED .that the city council approve the above - described va cation since it is in the public interest based on the following reasons: TL.....,,: a....- .�...�e .•F:.ese+ ��+srs+ nAenttr1Cm - Ch .Qt%f% J ,1 l ;C .:dUTAk C11L .Ul LJ&JLw1 I.iVO lint T %r rsv%w% j" -v v a vv� ...v.r....... • 2. These ri ht -of - ways are not needed for the public purpose of street construction. g will be dedicating new public street right -of -ways with the plat. 3. Thedeveloper g 4. May hill Road and Phylis Avenue are too narrow for street construction. Seconded by Councilmemb e r g Kittrid e Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge, .. Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach and Councilmember Koppers owin resolution vacating the unused drainage and roadway Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the foll g g easements lying - venue an north o ig woo venue In the N ew C entury eas y g east of Sc a er ve, west of ass own on the ma on page o developers application materials)* t is in the public interest to vacate PUD P t ese easements tor the tollowing reasons: 99 -o7 -058 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION ' Robert Engstrom Companies, WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, representing applied for the R g P vacation of the following- described easements: t three-quarters of the SE 1/4 of the NF, 1/4 of 1. The north 100 feet of the east two - thirds of the we s q Section 13, To p g � Y Township 28 Range 22 Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east 343.60 feet. 2. That part of the West 1/3 of the west 3/4 of the SE 1/4 of the N E 1/4 of Section 13, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey. County, Minnesota described as follows: he Southwest corner of said SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4; thence north 00 degrees 36 Commencing at East on an assumed bearin along the west line of said SE 1/4, a distance of minutes 28 seconds E , g 452.04 feet to the p oint of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing North 00 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 597.82 feet; thence East a distance of 70.00 feet; thence . South 09 degrees 30 minutes East a distance of 61.00 feet; thence East a distance of 150.40 feet; thence ee 40 minutes East a distance of 54.00 feet; thence South a distance of 130.x0 feet; South 33 degrees thence South 67 degrees 20 minutes West a distance of 123.73 feet; thence South a distance of 110.00 feet, • thence South 3 degrees 6 de ees 10 minutes West a distance of 105.36 feet; thence South 119.93 feet; . thence West 90 feet to the point of beginning. All lying north of Htghwoo . d Avenue and west of Century Avenue in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Maplewood; Minnesota. 13 7- 12 -99 18 WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: June 7 1999 the p lanning commission recommended that the city council approve these vacations. 1. On J . , , p g - held a p ublic hearing. The'city staff published a notice in the 2. On June 28, 1999, the city council p g Maplewoo Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at • the hearing chance to speak and resent written statements. The council also considered reports an g P P recommendations from the city.staff and planning commission. 3. On July 12, 1999, the city council again considered this request. se vac ions public interest in the property will go to the following WHEREAS, after the city approves the �t , p _ P abutting properties: Sub to roads and easements and except. the East 343.6 feet; the East 2/3 of the West 3/4 of the SE . I. 1/4 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PIN 13-28 -22 -14 -0018) • West 1/4 of the SE 1 of the NE 1/4 in Section 13, 2. Except the South 657 feet, The T ownship 28, . Y Ran e 22: R�amse County (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0020) g Y 3. The South 657 feet of the We st 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (Subject to road) of Section. 13, W* 8 Range 22 Rarr�se County, Minnesota. (PIN 13- 28 -22 -14 -0021} To nship 2 g Y Y _ All in Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota MOW, THEREFORE, EREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described vacations. for the following reasons: 1 It is in the public interest. adj acent prop owners have no } 2. The city and the } p p y p lans to build a street or utilities in these P locations. 3. The adjacent properties.have access to public streets and utilities. S econded by .Con g u cilmember Kittrid e Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge, Carlson Mays - Mayor Rossbach and Councilmember Koppen Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution for a Code variation for a substandard cul-de- sac where Schaller Drive meets the developer w est prop line. 7 -12 -99 19 14 99 -07 -059 STANDARD CUL -DE -SAC CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION SUB . VJ requested a variation from the H EREAS Mr. Robert Engstrom, o f the Robert Engstr Com ani�es; p . city code. . - e east end of Schaller Drive at variation applies to the existing cul-de-sac at th WHEREAS, this code PP . • t is north of Hi wood Avenue and west of proposed New Century that � the west property line far the prop . Century Avenue. ' that cul -de -sacs have a right -of WHEREAS, Se ction 30 -8 (b)(3) of the Maplewood Cty Code requires way diameter of 120 feet and a pavement diameter of 94 feet. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to change a temporary cul-de-sac into a permanent cul -de -sac with aright -of -way diameter of 100 feet and a reduced street pavement diameter. • e right-of-way diameter of 20 feet. WHEREAS, this requires a variation for WHEREAS, the history isto of this variation is as follows: • viewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning The Planning Commission re q commission reconunen ded that the council approve the proposed code variation. ' J une 28 1999. City staff published a Map lewood Ci Council held a public hearing on J The Map " the surrounding property owners. The council Lice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to g P . no p . • d to resent written statements. The council also gave everyone at the. hearing a chance to speak an p g ry considered re P orts and recommendations from the city staff. The Maplewood. City council again considered this request on July 12, 1999. RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the above- THEREFORE, BE IT RES . y NOW, THEREFORE, described variation subject to the city engineer approving the construction p Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge Seconded y b Councilmember Kittredge Ay & Carlson Nays May or Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen 1� y y setbacks for 2610 and 2611 Schaller give. Coun cilmember Carlson moved to approve the reduced building Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge 15 Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge & Carlson lea s - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen. Y 7-12-99 20 Counciirnember Carlson moved to a p p rove the following resolution approving a city code variation to have 50 - foot - pp _ � wide street right - of - ways o the 6U rig t - o - ways in the ever en . .rY 99 -07 -060 STREET RIGHT- OF -NVAY N IDTH. CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Robert Engstrom, of the Robert Engstrom Companies, requested a variation from the city code. WHEREAS, this code 'variation applies to the New Century PUD that is north of Highwood Avenue and west of Century Avenue. WHEREAS the legal description for this property is: 1 I the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 13, T.28, R.22, The south /z of the north /z of the west /z of Ramsey County, MN. and: The south /z of the west /z of t 1 1 he N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13. And: 'bed as commencing at the northeast corner of said That part of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13 de g • east line thereof 657 feet to the point of beginning; thence westerly N.E. 1/4; thence south alon the • 70-feet• thence :�r�sterl Y 80 feet; thence southerly 20 feet; thence westerly 50 110 feet, thence southerly • 0 feet' thence easterly 240 c. t mare or less, to the east line ref said N.E. ll4 feet,. thence soutli.,rly 6 Y thence north along the east line thereof 150 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to Century. Ave. and: r Lots 6 7 8 and 9, Block 1,A. Berg Addition. And: The. south /� of the east /z of 1 ' the N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4: of said Sec. 13, except that part described . _ cin at the northeast corner of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along.the east line as follows: commencing ' e g inning : thence westerly parallel to the north line of said N.E. 1/4 thereof 807 feet to the point of b g g Y p • e parallel to the east line of said N.E. 1/4 93 feet;. thence westerly parallel to . 240 feet, thence southerly p southerly p arallel to said east line of 415.95 more or less to the south said north line 48.17 feet, thence y p line of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/ 4' • thence east aloe the south line thereof to the southeast corner of said , g 1 /4 o f N. E. 1/, 4• thence north to the point of beginning. Subject to Century Avenue and: N.E. The west 3/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, Ramsey Co. MN., subject to roads and easements. And: 1 4 of the N.E. 1/4 Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, described as All that part of the east /� of the N.E. 1/ s • 't the East Line of said Sec. 13, distant 657 feet south. of the N.E. Cor. of follows. Commencing at a porn West and p arallel with the North 10 feet, thence South and said Sec. 13, thence Wes line of said Sec. 13, 1 p . e of said Sec. 13 a distance of 70 feet; thence West 80 feet, to the point of parallel with the East line , beginning to the I a n d to be described' thence South and parallel to said east line 20 feet, thence West 50 feet thence North 20 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. And: 7 -12 -99 21 16 The south 249 feet of the west 419 feet of the N Y2. of the E Y2of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4. of said Sec. 13. .A li in :�er_.rira_n .1_. T�um.�hin. �e22yRamsev County. Minnesota. (PINS 13- 28- 22 -11- . a a _ 00.14 0013 and 0022, 13- 28 -22 -14 -0018 0019, 0020 and 0021 0008,0015 Section 29 -53 of the Maplewood City Code WHEREAS, S p Y requires that local residential streets have 60 q feet of right -of -way. WH EREAS, the ap is p several local streets in the PUD with 50- foot -wide right -of- �`� � _ PP P P g . ways and reduced street pavement widths. WHEREAS, this requires a variation of ten feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation. is as. follows: The g Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning P commission recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation. The Map lewood City Council held a p ublic hearing on June 28,1999. City staff published a Th p y P notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council P gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and to present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations. from the city staff. The Maplewood City Council considered this request again on July 12, 1999. NO W, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the abo.ve- described variation subject to' the city engineer approving the construction plans. Seconded by Councilmember Kittridge Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge & Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmember Koppen Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the following resolution approving a city code variation to have 24 & 28 foot -wide street instead o t e - oot -wi a streets .in the New Century FUD. 99 -07 -061 STREET PAVEMENT WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS Mr. Robert Engstrom of the Robert Engstrom Companies requested a variation from the city code. WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the New Century PUD that is. north of Highwood Avenue, and west of Century Avenue. 17 7 -12 -99 22 WHEREAS, the legal description for this property is: The south %2 of the north %2 of the west %2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of Sec. 13, T.28, R.22, Ramsey % . t' a M • \JVL. � a • .• a. v..... N The south %2 of the west i /2 of the N.E.. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said. Sec. 13. And: That art of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13 described as commencing at the northeast corner of said N.E. Th p ; 1/4• thence south along the east line thereof 657f feet to the point of b .nce eginning; thence westerly 110 feet, thence southerl Y 70 feet; thence westerly 80 feet; thence southerly 20 feet; te westerly 50 feet; thence southerly 60 feet; thence easterly 240 feet more or less,. to the east line of said N:E. 1/4 thence north along the east line thereof 150 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to Century Ave. and: Lots 6, 7, 8 and 9, Block 1, Berg Addition. And: The south '/2 of the east t /2 of the N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4: of said Sec. 13, except that part described as follows: commencin g at the northeast corner of said N.E. 1/4; thence south along the east line thereof 807 feet to the aint of beginning: thence westerly parallel to the north line of said N.E. 1/4 240 feet; thence southerly P parallel to ' the east line of said N.E. 1/4 93 feet; thence westerly parallel to said north line 48.17 feet; thence southerly P arallel to said east line of 415.95 more or less to the south line of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence east alon g the south line thereof to the southeast corner of said N.E. 1/4 of N.E. 1/4; thence north to the point of beginning. Subject to Century Avenue. and: The west 3/4 of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, Ramsey Co. MN., subject to roads and easements. And: All that part of the east 1 /2 of the N.E.. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4, Sec. 13, T. 28, R. 22, described-as follows: Commencing at a point on the. East line of said Sec. 13, distant 657 feet south of the N.E. Cor. of said Sec. 13, thence West and parallel with the north line of said .Sec. 13, 110 feet, thence South and parallel with the East line of said Sec. 13, a distance of 70 feet; thence West 80 feet, to the. point of beginning to the land to be described; thence South. and P arallel to said east line 20 feet, thence West 50 feet, thence North 20 feet; thence easterly to the point of beginning. And: The south 249 feet of the west 419 feet of the lit '/2 of the E V2 of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Sec. 13. All in Section. 13, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (PINTS 13- 28 -22 -11 -0008 0015, 0014, 0013 and 0022, 1.3-28-22-14-0018,0019, 0020 and 0021.) WHEREAS, Section 29 -5 }C) P 9 of the M City Cade requires that local residential streets shall be 32 C a feet in width, measured between faces of curbs. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing 28- foot -wide, 24 -foot -wide and 20 -foot -wide streets with no parking on one side and no parking on both sides . WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet, eight feet and twelve feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: 18 7 -12 -99 23 The Maplewood Planning Commission reviewed this request on June 7, 1999. The planning commission P g recommended that the council approve the proposed code variation. nP mnnlei. od 0 tv Council held a- public hearinj on June 28,1999. City staff published a notice in the • -•- • - -� - - - Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. " tie eo gave everyone at to nedl�ing - a chance to speak eak and to resent written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff. The Maplewood City Council again considered this request on July 12, 1999. NO W THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve the_ above- described variation subject to no parking on one side of the 28- foot -wide streets, no both sides of the 24 -foot wide streets and n va J. P g the developer paying the city for the cost of no- parking signs, • Ayes' - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge Seconded by �Councllrnember Kittridge e Y & Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach & CounciImember Koppen Councilmember Kittrid g e moved to approve the Tollowing resolution approving a city code variation. for 28- foot -. wide and 24- foot -W' ide public streets in t e ew C entury PUD. 'd e Ayes - Councilmembers Allenspach, Kittridge Seconded by CounciImember Kittridge' ittn g Y . & Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach & CounciImember Koppen CounciImember Kittridge moved to eliminate access to Highwood Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Kittridge &Carlson Nays -Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Allenspach & Koppen CM0:TI0:NFAILED _._. � � l C O 1�16� ► � (cam. �/ Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the New Century preliminary plat (received by the city on March 26, 1 and the revised grading p ans receive by the city on May and the revised preliminary plat receive b y - the ity on July 1, 999. The developer shall complete the o awing betor e t o city council approves t o fina p at: 1. Sign an agreement with the city that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. � Complete all ding for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all city P requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. C. Have NSP install Group V rate street lights in at least nine locations - primarily at street 1.9 7 =12 -99 24 intersection s. The exactstyle and location shall be subject to the city. engineer's approval. d. Pa city a the ci for the cost of traffic - control, street identification and no parking signs. y e. Provide all required and necessary easements. f. Demolish, , remo ve o g r move the existin house and buildings at 2665 Highwood Avenue, and all other buildings, scrap etal, debris, vehicles and junk from the site. P g. Cap, seal and abandon all wells on site and remove any septic systems or drainfields within the plat, subject to Minnesota rules and guidelines. h. Complete all the curb and gutter on the Schaller Drive cul -de -sac to the west side of the site, repair the cul -de -sac pavement and restore and sod the boulevards. I. For the trails, do the following: (I } Construct an eight- foot -vide paved walkway between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2 as shown on the lat date-stamped May 24, 1999. This trail shall be in an 18 -foot -wide P P trailway or pedestrian way. (2) P The developer also shall build the wood -chip trails and sidewalks as shown on - the application materials and project plans. (3) P The developer shall install posts at the end of the trails to prevent cars or trucks from using the trail. (4) P The developer shall build. the trails and sidewalks with the streets. (5) The city engineer must approve these plans. tall ermanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall . Ins p gn g mark the. edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, or dumping beyond.this point. City staff shall approve the sign design and location before the contractor installs them. The developer or contractor shall install these signs before the city issues building permits .in this plat. k. . Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. I. Install signs where the driveways for the twin homes and for the town houses intersect the public streets indicating that they are private driveways. M. Have a n p q independent ualif ed g eotechnical engineering and soil testing firm monitor and inspect the pond during its construction. The city shall pre- approve the inspection firm(s) before they start their work. 2. ty g PP * Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail, sidewalk and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: 20 7 -12 -99 25 a, The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the city code. b. The grading plan shall show: (t} The proposed building pad elevation and contour information for ea¢1i home site. The lot lines on this plan shall follow the approved preliminary plat. (2) Contour information for all the land that the construction will disturb. (3) House pads that reduce the grading on sites where the developer can save large fees. (4) The proposed street grades as allowed by the city engineer. (5) All proposed slopes on the construction plans. The city engineer shall approve the plans,.specifications and management practices for any slopes steeper than 3:1. (6) All retaining walls on the plans. Any retaining walls taller than 4 feet require a building permit from the city. (7) Sedimentation basins or ponds as required by the watershed board or by the city engineer. c.* T'he tree plan shall: (1} Be approved by the city engineer before site grading or final plat approval (2) Show where the developer will remove, save or replace Iarge trees. This plan shall include an inventory of all existing large trees on the site. (3) Show the size, species and location of the replacement trees. The deciduous trees . shall be at least two and one half (2' /z) inches in diameter and shall be a mix of red and white oaks, . ash and sugar maples. The coniferous trees shall be at least eight (8) feet tall and shall be a mix of Austrian pine and other species. (4) Show no tree removal beyond the approved grading and tree limits. (5) Include for city staff a detailed boulevard tree planting plan and material list. d. The streeC and utility plans shall show: (Y) Paved walkways in a traiiway or pedestrian way as shown on the proposed plans and between Lots 4 and 5, Block 2. The parks and recreation director shalt approve their design. (2) The public streets shall be a 9 -ton design with a maximum street grade of eight percent and the maximum street grade within 75 feet of all intersections at two percent. 21 7 -12 -99 26 ( 3) All the streets, parking areas and driveways with continuous concrete curb and gutter except where the city engineer decides that it. is not needed for drainage purposes. ". (4) All pubic street rig�it -of -ways shall be at Least ou- ieet -wtaeunless , tn,e ci -c our1c:Yl approves a narrower street right -of -way: 5 The completion re of the curb and gutter on the existing Schaller Drive cut -de -sac, the C� . air or re lacement of the cut -de -sac paverr�ent and the restoration and sodding of P P the boulevards around the cul -de -sac. e. The drainage plan shall ensure that there is no increase in the rate of storm water run -off leaving the site above the current (predevelopment) levels. technical en ineer shall design - the storm water pond proposed at the f. A qualified gea g gn southeast corner of the site. The proposed design shall �be subject to a quality engineering peer review and recommendation by a geotechnical engineer approved by the city engineer. The developer shall P ay for this review. The developer's consultants shall complete this review and approval before submitting the final construction plans to the city engineer. Additional subsurface soil evaluations also shall be required within the proposed pond and berm areas. 3. Change the plat as follows: a. Add drainage and utility easements as required by the city engineer. b. Sho utility w drainage and utili easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property Lines and five feet wide along the side property. lines. C. Revise the Lot lines in Block Two so there is an 18- foot -wide trail or pedestrian way. between Lots 4 .and 5 to. accommodate the trail and watermain to Schaller Drive. d. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the watershed district. S how all p ublic street right-of-ways at 60 feet wide, unless the city council approves e. S p narrower street right -of -ways. Make as man of the p roperty lines as is reasonably possible radial to the cul-de-sacs or f. M y P P perpendicular to the street right -of - ways. g. Change the 40- foot -wide trail easement at the west end of Promontory Place (Dahl Avenue) (between Lots 12 and 13, Block 1) to a 40- foot -wide. trail or pedestrian way. 4. Secure and P rovide all required easements for the development. These shall include: a. Any off -site drainage and utility easements. b. Wetland. easements over the wetlands and any land within 50 feet surrounding a Class II 7 -12 -99 27 22 wetland. The easement shall prohibit any building or structures within 50 feet of the Class H wetland or any mowi , cutting, filling, grading or dumping within 50 feet of the wetland or. within the wetland itself. e easements is to rotect the water quality of the w from fe�i izer' The purpose of thes p and runoff. They also are to protect the wetland habitat from encroachment. 50 shall complete all din for public improvements and overall site drainage. The city The developer p gra P engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 6. Record the following with the final plat: a. All homeowners association documents. de ed restriction that p rohibits driveways on Lots 11 and 1.2, Block 4. from b. A covenant or de P going onto Highwood Avenue. necessary C. Deeds dedicating the necessa wetland buffer easements surrounding any wetland. restriction that prohibits an further subdivision or splitting of the lots d. A covenant or deed. r p Y . or P arcels in the plat that would create additional building sites unless approved by. the city council. The a licant shall submit the language for these dedications .and restrictions to the city for PP approval before recording. tat as approved b watershed district. A trained and qualified 7. Show the wetland boundaries on the p pp y the person must delineate the wetlands. This person shall prepare a wetland delineation report. The developer shall submit this wetland information to the Watershed District office. The Watershed District Faust approve this information before the city approves a final plat. If needed, the developer shall change the plat to meet wetland regulations. it from the Ramsey-Washi Washin 8. Obtain a perm y tan Metro Watershed District for grading. g to final p part art of the preliminary plat, the director of community development . If the developer decides_ may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The complete developer must these conditions before the city issues a grading permit or approves the P P final plat. The Council q took no action on th e r to waive the Park Access Charges (PAC) for the building permits for q the New Cent residential PUD. This development would be north of Highwood Avenue and west of Century Avenue. Councilmember Carlson mo ved ap ved to a the following esolution for the on street parking standards and no g on- street parking requirements or the New Century north o ig woo venue an west o entury, Avenue. 23 7 -1 2 -99 28 .. a. . wi has a roved a resi denUAI UD anCLPMJ="1Ly PLaL 0"j w « `� "' "`" " ""3' VaUREAS, M PP . - - f -wa - REAS the developer wants to have reduced street nght o y widths and reduced street pavement widths in this devetapmant t REAS the city has approved reduced street right -of -way widths and reduced street pavement widths in the development, subject to on- street parking restrictions. • m the city code standa they do not Section 29 -52(b) of the city code allows variations fro tY . V;MREAS, • affect the g eneral purpose of the city code. rohibits the � arking of motor vehicles on pRE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Maplewood p P NOW, THEREF , - and rohibits arking on one side of the public streets that are both sides of all public streets less than 28 feet wide p P • f Hi hwoad Avenue and west of Century Avenue in Section 2 8 feet to 32 feet wi n in the N ew Century PUD north o g Seconded by Couhcilmember K.ittridge ilmembers Allens ach, Kittridge . Ayes Counc P & Carlson Nays - Mayor Rossbach & Councilmemb.er. Koppen uncilmember� Kittredge moved to approve the developer's request to start the construction of up to four model Co -1-h is subj to e n Red Pine Circle (Va tew irc e e ore a city approves t e trio p a . homes a . o owing cond itions: t each builders location before the city I. There shall be utilities and a hard surface street or driveway o issues a building permit. • surveyed into lace by a registered land surveyor. 20' The builder shall_ have each structures Y P Seconded by Councilmember Allen spach Ayes Councilmembers, Kittridge, Carlson and Allenspach Nays - Mayor Rossbach and Councilmernber Kopp 7 -12 -99 29 24 Agenda # Action by Council MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Modified I FROM: Duwayne Konewko, Environmental Health Official SUBJECT. Conditional Rejected Conditional Use .Permit Review -- Choice Auto Rental LOCATION: 2923 Highway 61 North DATE: March 7, 2003 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit for Choice Auto Rental in the LaMettry Collision building (2923 Highway 61) is- due for review. The conditional use permit allowed Choice Auto Rental to operate a motor vehicle rental business as a tenant within the existing LaMettry Collision building. Refer to the maps on pages 2 -4. BACKGROUND On November 22, 1999, the city council approved a conditional use p ermit for a motor vehicle rental business for this location. Refer to the city council minutes on page 5. On November 13, 2000, the city council reviewed the conditional use ermit and re mired review p q in one year. Refer to the city council minutes on page 6. DISCUSSION Staff has not received any complaints regarding Choice Auto Rental. The. fence west of the parking lot has been fixed and I did not observe any vehicles arked in the drive aisles during zn p g y site` visit. I also indicated to the employees that they are not to utilize the drive aisles for parking purposes. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for Choice Auto Rental located at 2923 Highway 61 North again only if a problem arisen or if a revision to the conditional use permit is ro osed. p p p :sec4ichoiceauto Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. CUP conditions dated November 22, 1999 5. November 1 2000 City Council Minutes Attachment 7 U WD: W .3 4. -_! w Q t �p G4' 2, SUMMIT CT. Z O�c •� 1-- 2 COUN TMEW CIR. ST ✓ �c DULUTH CT. 4 LYDIA ST. BEAM AVE. BEAM p— w kONC g CT • °O c� 0 0 w W Markham O z Pond Kohimcn v w _ Lake v 1 rris v �- V ike KOHLMAN AVE. Z Hor .cod • . Pork. ui w z3 •��ROAD C c� ti COUNTY • , ro N z3 SS PALM �� �, cr Z w Z • cn N! :z CT. P W 5 o C7• ,? CX ui C Cd�'� � CON � � � ONNOR NOR DEM ONT AVE. p,VE. v AVE. v CT • DEI AVE. Off' BROOKS AVE. c~n BROOKS @ o CA w . AVE. J BROOKS '� 41 SEC TANT. a �= Fovr 9 E .. CT. a Q'' AVE.. cn � z SEXTANT AVE.' a � GERVAIS AVE. GERVAIS � z v GRANDVIEW AVE. W per'• �• VIKING OR. Y Lc V) Keller w @ Lake LOCATION MAP • 2 SHERREN AVE. • Knuc�e J ad . Lake L—=� coP COPE -� AVE. CT. w o LAR LARK r— AVE. @ CO. 4 RD: _ U LAURIE RD. tn Sn«wood o LAURIE Z. Parfc cr- ELAND RD. o SAND URST M AVE. 6 wi Iq ~ LOCATION MAP • 2 Attachment 2 Ilk a .... ; y• LEXUS ■ �.. • 3000 WING AREA '� G a • ■ .. v (1q) . cm -- - - - -» • e s.w1 ' . Z Q • • . 140 Q - - - -- -- - - - n �• -•- - - - -- - - -- • w I zo" C1 RC , E'jy 2946-1 0 n (27) ,, '" o ,3o ^, N *- = �. y. GULDENS �'•= 293 0 s �� 2990 o ' 2 0 Ie' ,e N o =_ .. ��p'`' 1p A SUMMIT CT. a 2978 .2999 : ;, • t ` (Q A -44.0 340 007 - (� � �' � 0 0 , 7ti , 2970 ; (: �:� - 00 � 4 0 s� A� �, ,, N _ : - tZ r .. 4' r •� r• a 1. 2882 .r :• I O , 2 %S Ss RE. '� 2962 0 =0 � • � � .� V 2980 _ a5 N •o� r- ,N 1 of 2954 +� COUNTRy, •J3 co w I zo" C1 RC , E'jy 2946-1 0 n (27) ,, '" o ,3o ' 8 29 '. . ,, o 0t) N 1 N 38 , D.tts 293 0 s �� t tf ( L Z . ,e N o w 1k . 4WD ° 19 ( 33) DULUT OT. ate'+ 1 Ao.o2 /a� 14z 0 29 { A p . 1 0 -•, 2 cl t16 lip T C4 1 19 t ` r• %2898. • , 7ti 2889° �e f 0.289 • j - 00 � . _ _ �� �• _ . CLJ tZ r .. 4' r • r 2883 r• a 1. 2882 �a •moo +s Go Y tln a If. AIR t1 s.4 n A I r . - f% 1SIac 1190 wI 0 11 .1 �• isit -- 6 . 0 u n d • �? 13' Ltd• ' • s ,e... � ( r .2950 7 AUTO SERVICE SITE = .' oi it. 21 ,1E IN I Y ' ........... Oyi h 1 LAME TTRY SITE ! �o�; �= -.1; A .% ........... 'ti � _ ern• sew. - -� a GOLF COURSE MAPLEWOOD, .. ... r 2926 all TOYOTA SITE Q E L� 1.7 , sc 1 1>' G a .y 2889 mp � o ,on N' • ' � lap =sew slctj iA �,, , `• Cw.•49 O.•a• 0" 1• "BEAM AVENUE r C ES•f t .�f � J o , . #t - TOYOTA • " "•' . - ft 0 0� 1 G �� N N o 3.14 Inc T' ' 2873 A •4 w , ' • a. =- • 4• f /' 1 10 // ' t). � r r t PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 3 I I • i f 1 tl 1 1 I • t •1 � it e 1 1 C t _ • i ` I �I � 1 I 1 • iL - - - -- I 1 ------------------- •-------- - - --, FUTURE AUTO USES ........ L l 1 Kn . ... e ..". . ........... 'Z ft z _ 1 --- -- - - - - - -- . ' LIETTR1l� COLL AN PROPOSED �.� =• ::= "� t ..... C HOICE CHQICE AUTO RENTAL art. s ... 1. r l i i . i /i t 1 • ; l op �e 100 < < I 1 �� ♦� r - .- - - - --� MAP'LE1fi OO D t TOYOTA I ' I XT BUILDING to i� it � i 1 ! � � tt� : =� `� l• , j i .. 1 1 t - - - - - - - -- - - - I .00 .00� -------- - - - - -- •- -- - - - - -- eiAm AVENUE ----------------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -_ SITE PLAN 4 N .4 9 based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because: Attachment 4 ' 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained; constructed and operated to. be in confot with the ci . tY fiY cornprehen.sive plan and .code of ordinances. 2. The us-e would not change the .existing or }Manned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. ' The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would p o be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, distur person or property P P P bing or cause a nuisance to any ro er - because of excessive noise,. glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibrati general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on TocaI streets and would not create traff ff c con or unsafe access on. existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services ,"including streets olice and . � .. g , p . fire protection, drainage structures, water and' sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional.costs for ublic facilities or services. P 8. The use would maximize the preservation*. of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9: The'use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. - Approval. is subject to the following conditions: 16. The Activities shall follow the site plan approved by the city The director of community development ma approve Y _ Y P Y Pero e minor changes. 2. The proposed use must be substantially started - within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null Y PP P 1 and void. . The council may extend this .deadline for' one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4.. Number of rental cars shall not exceed ten. Seconded by Councilmen Koppen Ayes - all 11-22-99 E ATTACHMENT . 5 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 13, 2000 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 00-23 .12. Conditional Use Permit Review - Choice Auto Rental (2923 Hi hwa 61 North Highway ) Approved review of the conditional use permit for the motor vehicle rental business at 2923 Highway 61 North again in. one year. G Agenda #__ MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review LOCATION: Maplewood Toyota - 2873 Highway 61 DATE: March 7, 2003 INTRODUCTION Project Description Aetiort by Council 1 Date. Endorsed Modified Rejected The conditional use permit (CUP) for Maplewood Toyota at 2873 Highway 61 is due for review. This CUP is for a motor vehicle sales and service business in the M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning district. Refer to the maps on pages 47 and the city council' minutes starting on page 11. Recent Approvals On October 8, 2001, the city council approved Mr. McDaniels' plans to expand Maplewood Toyota. In addition to a new parking. lot north of Beam Avenue, the council approved a conditional use permit (CUP) revision for three small additions on the dealership building. One was a 375- square -foot lunchroom addition on the northwest comer of the building (the applicant no longer proposes to build this addition), a 1,144- square -foot service - write -up area on the north side of the building and a 3,040 - square -foot showroom addition on the southeast corner of the building. Refer to the approved October 8 2001, expansion plans on pages 8 through 10. On March 11, 2002, the city council approved revised plans for the expansion of Maplewood Toyota. These plans include a 4,972 - square -foot addition onto the south side of the Maplewood Toyota building. This additional space is to enlarge the service garage. The exterior of the addition will be rock face concrete block like the existing building and painted to match. The applicant also will be replacing concrete curbing on the south and southeast sides of the lot, removing a curbed parking island south of the building and patch the asphalt at this island area. He also will be installing a new bituminous overlay on the south parking lot. (See the project .plans on pages 6 and 7.) DISCUSSION y The contractor for Maplewood Toyota. (Kraus- Anderson) is progressing with the construction of the building additions. Since the construction is underway and the contractor will not be finished with the project until later this.year, the city council should review this permit again in one year. This review will give staff, the contractor and the property owner a chance to ensure that the project is meeting all city ordinance and conditions of approval. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for Maplewood Toyota at 2873 Highway 61 again in one year or sooner if the owner proposes a major change to the site. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 3.94 acres Existing land use: Maplewood Toyota SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Beam Avenue and Maplewood Toyota's new parking lot South: KSTP property with radio towers West: A vacant lot used as a holding pond and houses East: Highway 61 , PAST ACTIONS January 18, 1979: The city council approved a plan amendment, special use permit and project plans for the original Maplewood Toyota building. January 9, 1995: The council approved a CUP_ and the plans fora 1,404 - square -foot addition on the north side of Maplewood Toyota. January 22, 1996: The council reviewed the CUP for Maplewood Toyota. They decided to only review the permit again if a problem arises. October 8, 2001: The council revised the CUP and approved plans for the three small additions and new parking lot. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: M -1 (light manufacturing) Zoning: M -1 Ordinance Requirements: Section 36 -17(e) allows the city council to approve a CUP for the enlargement of a nonconforming use. Section, 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for maintenance garages. Section 36- 187(b) requires a CUP for any building construction in a M -1 district that is closer than 350 feet to a residential district. 2 p:sec4/Toyota review 2003.doc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Building Elevations 5.. - Previously Approved Site Plan from. 10 /8/01 8: Previously Approved Elevations from '10 /8/01 7. Previously Approved Parking Lot Expansion from 10/8/01 ' 8. March 11, 2002 City Council Minutes 3 ' Attachment 1 VADNAIS HEIGHTS �9 CoUMTM kC:: a c <t . W Liu SEAM AVE. k Cy ee Kohiman Lake f �- COUNTY 1 K PALM CT. Tyr C 0 J i s AVE. �' IF 82 ,/ U WHITE 1 D I. sum cr. 2. coWzwIEw cam. mow. 3. DULUTH CT. m W � Markham KOFILkiAN AVE. �. z C If El Z DEMONT AVE m �e 4 ` DR. Kellar • S } CO. RD. c } Lake �, E Cr. ,`lk LELAND RD. JUN TiON AVE. Ainkcs al Four SEXTIJVT �AVE. � y AVE. j r I tEN AVE. . N Knue�i�fi�e Lake ►URIE� � LAURIE ;it RD AVE. �f URKE AVE. � � : IRME// - - - A - VE LOCATION MAP 4 t Attachment 2 ro. T­ ; " . .......... . I . . . . ...... \< rrrrrrrr Cz I _.Ze. ............. rk . . . . . . . . . . -.7- l MAP �', 7, TOYOTAI .......... 'Z,� . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... i t . . . . . . . . ... IN iy Ile PROPERTY LINE ZONI,NG MAP znN�^y H4y IG - 1 •r • I 1 1 . i i 1 1� •.■■ r000044000M rrrNEro. rOUr.. wo 011Mr ..�r.�w•r..�.r•�r�r00100r4 mumm4 •ammsr. I oum t.rmmmr"� .slim =No •. NINON • wo I r• MEMO ..r•...• •r.�• -FT ADDITION APPROVED ON OCTOBER 8, 2001 ; 9 • P - I r MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA i I r PROPOSED ADDITION = .� x ,f • ADDITION' APPROVED 8 2001 ON OCTO BER f e� � I 1 SITE PLAN 6 L�-K Attachment 4 e 2� NORTH ELEVATION M two—) 1�1dtli � � o n ice wrlile QFl (.Xr� ------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �� i� � ors .. Slna� rooms 3 EAST ELEVATION SC -ALA: ............... ............ ................................................. L 9 OU 7H - PNEST ELEVATION At S 'ALO: . BUILDING ELEVATIONS Attachment 5 W a O KE a 2z LLN ra 4 - g - d 0 119 z 1E Ed �A IL HI I W Z x W 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - 1241A f —P .1 H I J ' J L I f - I a C] I / 6 BEAM AvE, El m j i Previously Approved Site Plans October 8, 2001 4 N Attachment 6 IM1� DIMM PAM %VM YI►l'CtH a wanxim �,►� M MUL Rum= 10 WSM r" 0 ii I . wa PQR r -" MAM cum 0 I►ACN MI�.1 TQ MA10i k74�ifM NOwAw1® ■b! IN Mill{, Roma 10 alai MOAM r Nw oo�lrmucrlal a Previously Approved Elevations October 8, 2001 9 4 N Nrn m+sltrla,al l�l � a�/aa'•,� -or Attachment 7 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE KEY QTY COMMON NAME ®OTANICAL NAME SIZE / MODE Oi 76 T'JLACK WILLS SP44XK MCEA GLAUCA CENSATA' W am r Sr. 1 SPIREA GA.OI•I WV SM14A JAPONICA p• POT . . Fwp r Aw MNE hW5 IQSNMA 6 OTG • EK ! AYTL M SLAM HAPLE ACER A FREAMMI •JUMM501 lD' 7 102 0-0 SM 7 LEGACY SUGAR MAM.E ACER SAC&AAR tlH 'LEGACY• 7 V7• e40 I x I 'NO&VI T CRAG MALUO •'NOWDWT" I t12"540 . C! ) COLORA00 SPPW" MCEA PUNGEN! 1 NOTE. ALL NCWLY LANOSCAPTEG ALVQK is EXISTING 04 -VGS. S7iALL CC . WATERED 6Y ALN IN GROUNO IRRICJ,ATION BUILCIIVG SYSTEM. _ NGW S' WISE PRESSURE: ' TPMATEO WOOD STAIRC40,11 ' �� EXI6TING RgT�'.INh.I! WOLL � � ' �Z. ~ NEW RETAINING WALL , I I I TTT7T� � Exl S TRE:EIO � / ; - - - - - � - - � :� t• � TIN J NIEW MURM WITH G• TAL PrLAC.IC WILLS SPRUCE PE: IN TREE MOIL 801916 OPAQUE V i e NATURAL I°LANTII ARMA IhIRILLEO �C O WILO FLC�W E s E PIREi A. t.. _ mil) .. � • 5A%1aL7 TREES J •�` SC • .c- POND •'� ' e . svvao TREE CS --�- SA.. -ev rREEs E :may I� NATURAL P"LANTINr- AREA INPILLEC }� !� RP T. W, aRESOVITAE. CsiPHNG 01 -IREA. / L..�� ir� �� / AND WILD FLOWERS. X 00O ALONG 00111- 0 EVAR3 sNAL EE L G REPAIRED AMC) RESOOCEO U*49RE N6E V- NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN Previously Approved Parking Lot Expansion October 8, 2001 �n 4 N Attachment 8 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 11, 2002 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 02 -05 1. 7:00 P.M. Maplewood Toyota- Conditional Use Permit Revision and Design Review A. Conditional Use Permit Revision B. Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. .Assistant Community Development Director Ekstrand and City Engineer Ahl presented the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report. d. Boardmember Linda Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Andy Helchoir, General Manager, 5588 Park Place Drive, Shoreview Frederick Richter, Steiner Development, 3610 County Road 101, Wayzata. f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen moved adopt the following resolution approving . a conditional use permit revision for a 4,972 - square -foot service area addition on Maplewood Toyota at 2873 Highway 61: RESOLUTION 02 -03 -027 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Steve McDani.els, of Maplewood Toyota, applied for a conditional use permit revision to add onto an automobile repair garage. WHEREAS, Section 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for maintenance garages. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2873 Highway 61. The legal description is: Subject to widened STH 61/1, Lot 101 Gardena Addition to Ramsey County, MN. (PIN 04- 29 -22 -41 -0006) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 20, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On March 11, 2002, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. 11 NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the .above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or. air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed. streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9.. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved. by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction-must be substantially started within one year of city council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Beam Avenue shall not be used for_ loading or unloading. 5. The applicant shall be required to submit a drainage and utility plan to the City Engineer for review and approval as noted in condition 2b on page 4 of the staff report. The City Engineer shall require the applicant to implement storm water quality improvements into the final drainage and utility plan that shall include the addition of rainwater gardens, an improvement and regrading of the storm water outlet pond, and other reasonable (as determined by the City Engineer) storm water quality improvements such that the site begins to implement runoff standards typical to property within the shoreland district. If a reasonable agreement with the property owner cannot be achieved by the City Engineer, this Conditional Use Permit Revision and Design Approval shall be returned to the City Council for consideration. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All 12 Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date - stamped January 23, 2002, for a 4 square -foot service area addition on the south side of Maplewood Toyota. This approval is. based on the findings reciuire-d- bv the city code. The approval shall be subject to the applicant or owner meeting the following conditions a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not .issued a building permit for this project. b. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the city engineer for approval. All curb removal, curb replacement and paving overlay shall be subject to the requirements of the city engineer. c. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall. submit a revised site plan for staff approval showing enough customer parking spaces on the main Toyota Dealership site north of the building. This parking shall be signed for "customer parking." The applicant shall provide written justification for staff verifying that there will be sufficient customer parking provided. The revised site plan shall provide for all. of the handicap parking spaces to. be placed adjacent to the building. There shall be enough spaces to meet ADA (Americans with Disability Act) requirements. These spaces shall be striped according to ADA requirements. d. Before the city issues a building permit, the applicant shall submit a photometric plan for the new exterior lighting proposed on the site. e. Complete the following before occupying the addition: 1) Any new roof - mounted mechanical equipment on the addition shall be painted to match the building. Any roof -top equipment visible from nearby homes must be screened according to ordinance. 2) Install fire protection and alarm systems as required by the fire marshal 3) Repair all damaged. sections of the chain link fence, repair /replace the broken fascia on the northerly shed and remove any debris and stored materials that are in the open. At the applicant's discretion, instead of repairing. or replacing the damaged sections of chain link fence, the chain link fence located on the west side of the lot can be removed entirely. 4) Patch the parking lot not planned for bituminous overlay, restripe all customer - parking areas, overlay the south parking lot and install all proposed new curbing. 5) Redirect the two wall- mounted lights on the west side of the building to face directly downward as well as any new west - facing lights on the addition. 6) The replacement curb shall be continuous concrete curbing, subject to the design requirements of the city engineer. f. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: 1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. 2) The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the unfinished. work. Any unfinished landscaping shall be completed by June 1 if the building is occupied in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy if the building is occupied in the spring or summer. 13 3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. g. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve _minor changes. h. The city encourages the applicant to remove one or more. of the three sheds on the property. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All 14 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: INTRODUCTION Agenda City Manager Action b Council DuWayne Konewko, Environmental Health Official Conditional Use Permit Review -- St. Jerome's Catholic Schoo 0 - el 3 8 0 .' Ro selawn Avenue East End, 1 March 21 2003 Modified Rejected -- use permit for .the expansion of St. Jerome's Catholic Preschool (380 Roselawn The conditional p , p , is due for review. The conditional use permit allowed St. Jerome's Catholic School Avenue East ) p to add a 3,800-square-foot addition to the . northwest corner of the elementary school to accommodate an increase in the. number of children utilizing the preschool and daycare facility. A new entry was also included as art of this expansion. Refer to the maps, site plan, and p elevations on pages 2 -5. BACKGROUND the planning commission approved the conditional use permit for the On February 20, 2002, p g p expansion of St. Jerome's Catholic School located at 380 Roselawn Avenue East. uni design review board On February 26, 2002, the community (CDRB) reviewed and approved the g desi gn plans for the expansion of St. Jerome's Catholic School. On March 11, 2002, the pp use perm e city council approved the conditional it for the expansion of St. . Jerome's Catholic School subject to review in one year. Refer to the city council minutes on pages .6 -8. DISCUSSION the sion of St. Jerome's Catholic School. Staff has not received any complaints regarding ex p an The city council requested a revised landscape plan be submitted for this project prior to the qu p p building permit. The revised landscape plan was submitted and approved and the issuance of a bu g p p . w p p work was completed in comp liance with this new plan submittal. There are no outstanding issues with respect to this project. RECOMMENDATION the conditional use permit for St. Jerome's Catholic School located at 380 Roselawn Review Avenue y enue East again only if a problem arises or if a revision to the conditional use permit is proposed..* p:secl7\st jeromescatholicschool Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Elevations 5. March 11, 2002 City Council Minutes Attachment 1 s � e W E-a .. .............. L ... . ....... 10 ... ........ Luc) :.:. i;illil .. ... .......................... . ..... .. ........ ...................................... . .......... ........... ........................................ ....... .. ....... ... ... ....... ........................ ............................................ ....................................... ... .. ..... ...... .. ............ ... .... Liu i — � . 5t ���c�rn� � ■ .... .......... ma n ��t�a►li� ��urc ...... ...... .......... .... ................. ...... Location Map 2 N W E S Attachment Z ... i Etli : :ii:i Attachment 3 1�o�es low c 1 j 1 . . . . . . . . . . _ _ Ho�ne� Tor 3 •• 0 t Attachment ' 4 3 . ,oi PI" wr _ .7 1 > Yor aAMM MWA- C=N4Trq=ro4 r r Ff MIR NMI ■■.■. Nome gamma ■ ■■r. ■. ■■. a.m. Nominated, --------- ---- IT ■n \ • ■' UNNOWN ar,C1■�'v_ == �'_ == __ �� r:= �.______ __ r = ___ _ _ ____'. -ar ri _ == r= ___s } =�r_ __= _i__r -_ r E A A � = °- __ � _- L =-' __ = .a _ _� =r' 1 " -� -_ yz_ _ - _ _- =z ~' d r r Ff M y GA 0� ■.■ M. ■■.■. Nome gamma ■ ■■r. ■. ■■. a.m. Nominated, --------- ---- IT ■n \ • ■' UNNOWN ' oue� u,.cn+� rem ca�+e�aic'na+ Ir -i ale- - 1/2* apwx orew.w u $ U U N W E S E Ek�A-�i Elevations 5 . ATTACHMENT 5 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March .11, 2002 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 02' -05 2. 7:10 St. Jerome's Church Addition (380 Roselawn Avenue) A. Conditional Use Permit Revision B. Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. Assistant Community. Development Director Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report. C. Commissioner Eric Ahlness presented the Planning Commission report. d. Boardmember. Linda Olson presented the Community Design Review Board report e. g public hearing, p Mayor Cardinal opened the un , calling for proponents or opponents. The following . p persons were heard: Eric Ketelsen, MCI Architects, Inc., 1439 Blair Avenue Ken Klutske, 458 Woodriff Avenue, Roseville Jerry Bimmer, 2011 Edgemont Street Father Ken Ludescher, Pastor of St. Jeromes f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution adopting the resolution granting a conditional use hermit revision and design appro for the expansion of a preschool at St. Jerome's Catholic School: RESOLUTION 02 -03 =028 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS St. Jerome's Catholic School applied for a conditional use permit for the expansion of a preschool; WHEREAS, this p ermit applies to property located at 380 Roselawn Avenue East, Maplewood, Minnesota. The legal description is The East 1 /2 of the NW Quarter Q uarter of the NW of the SW' Quarter of Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; and also the N 233 ft of the E 160 ft of the W 327.31 ft of the SW 1 /4 of Section 17, Townshi p g 29, Range 22; and also the S 75 ft of the N 433 ft of the W 1 /2 of the NW 1 /4 of the NW Quarter of the SW 1 /4, Section 17, Township 29, Range 22; and also the W 1 /z of the NE 1 /4 of the NW 1 /4 of -the SW 1 /4 Section 17 Township 29, Range 22, except that part deeded to Ramsey County as shown by a > p g p . deed in Book 750 of Deeds on page 634, and except an easement for highway purposes; and also S 125 ft of the N 358 f of the W 327 and 327.31 ft of the N Quarter of the NW Quarterof the SW Quarter of Section 17 Townshi p 29 , Range e 22 , J g subject to the rights of the public in highways, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. WHEREAS, the Ramse y Count y Property erty Identification Number for this property is as follows: 17-29-22-32-0004. 6 ,WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 20 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the conditional use permit. J 2. On March 112002, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent. notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the public_ hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and present written statements.. The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described onditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because: - 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use .would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity,* , p rocess, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or. property , because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, .drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, .electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would g enerate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use'would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions: L' All construction of St. Jerome's Preschool addition shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. . The proposed preschool addition must be substantially started within one year of council . P p approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 7 Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date stamped JanuM 9, 2002, for a 3,800 square foot addition to St. Jerome's Catholic School'. The city is aapr these plans based on the findings required b code. The applicant shall do the following: a. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. b. Complete the following before the City issues a building permit: (1) Provide a revised landscape plan to be approved by staff showing: three ornamental trees of at least 1 1 Bali e six. .ts�.�e__p anted on the west side_ _Q.f, �.,addltio�cros.�.. , .� al le; an i olw- maintenance. or perennial plants to be planted along the new sidewalk, around the proposed bollard lights. izi. �� � �`.,�. �•�4:' --- �7y ,; ?•� 1.. 9 '� �p r _ � �r,�./ `r�� 11� � � � ,,,,, �5� - j' 3. �'� " ' (2) :Submit a gra In drainage, utility and erosion. control plan to the city engineer for approval. C. Complete the following•before occupying the building: ( 1 ) Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent. property. ( 2) St. Jerome's School is exempt from the dumpster screening requirements as long as the dumpsters are stored on the southwest corner of the lot, in between the school and the garage and remains screened by surrounding mature trees. () lighting All exterior li htin installed must comply with the city's lighting ordinance and must not exceed a 0.4 -foot candle at the property line. d. If an required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if: Y q Y Y (1) Y The C determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. ( 2) Y The Ci receives a cash-'escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be. 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. ( 3) tY receives an The C a g r eement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. � c. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may pp p approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All q 5 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: DATE: Agenda # Action by Council MEMORANDUM Date City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner = _F • = :1.� :� Conditional Use Permit Review — Hillcrest Animal Hospital 1320 County Road D March 11, 2003 INTRODUCTION Project Description The conditional use permit (CUP) for Hillcrest Animal Hospital at 1320 County Road - D is due for review. This CUP is for an animal hospital in the M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning district that is closer than 350 feet to a residential zoning district. Refer to the maps on pages 3 -6 and the city council minutes starting on page 9. Recent Approvals 4n March. 25, 2002, the city council approved a conditional use permit (CUP) and the design plans for the construction of a new animal hospital at 1320 County Road D. These plans include a new 7,000- square -foot, one -story animal hospital and a new parking lot to the north and east of the former animal hospital. (See the project plan_ s on pages 5 and 6.) The CUP for this project was subject to eight conditions of approval. On August 27, 2002, the community design review board (CDRB) approved revised design plans for this project including those for the retaining wall, the landscaping for the dog run and landscaping for the residential screening and the building foundation. DISCUSSION The contractor for the animal hospital has completed most of the building and site construction. There are some items that need to be finished including Landscaping, a retaining wall, the installation of a second lift of asphalt and the striping of the parking lot. Dr. Bouthilet, the owner of the hospital, expects to complete these items later this year. Since not all of the site improvements are complete and the owner will not be finished with the project until- later this year, the city council should review this permit again in one year. This review will give staff and the property owner a chance to ensure that the project is .meeting all city ordinances and conditions of .approval. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for the Hillcrest Animal Hospital at 1320 County Road D again in one year or sooner if the owner proposes a major change to the site. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 78,590 square feet (1.8 acres) Existing land use: Hillcrest Animal Hospital SURROUNDING LAND USES North: New Offices across County Road D South: A house planned and zoned M -1 owned by Sparkle Auto West: Single dwellings along County Road D East: Highway 61 _ PLANNING Land Use Plan and Zoning designations: M -1 Code Requirements Section 36-187(b) states that no building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted within 350 feet of a residential district without a CUP. Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for approval. p :sec3 \hillcrest animal review 2003.doc Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property. Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Proposed Grading Plan 5. Building Elevations 6. Building Elevations 7. March 25, 2002 City Council minutes 2 Attachment 1 VADNAIS HEIGHTS WHITE BEAR.. -1 COUNTY ROAD D -CaUN �C HIGHRIDGE CT. Z. Ion Q t ; J L.YDIA AYE. 1.: SUMMIT C'. ST. .L OHN'S �'. I k- J 2. CO•UNTRYVIEW CIR. BLVD. 3. DULUTH CT, a . cn. z G� W W BEAM V) �. AVE.. 19 = [� AV 60) w ko� --- -- -tnr--.-• --- �' w 0. Markham ohImon. Pond As Lake w z 61 KOHLIulAN in . . 5. o� . ��• �i. w cn w Z COUNTY ROAD, 23 Toy z. PAS `' a�Ier o �'� C. ch CT. CIR• Cou � Uj Q a to Q 5 3 CF v w w E D E HI LL CONNQR Cd� >. � � CpN N0� .r= CT, Ni AV AVE. z D A V E. Q DEi1 fit- . w. 221 ROOK AVE. E. .. � �, �A * v Four � ! <1 1 ' SEXTANT`' Q SEXTANT AVE. o� �� . G� t 60 GERVAI F�( AVE. _ cn �. G R =GRM `D�tEVV L C p oo . P- La c 36 VIKING jj� 5MERREN AVE. ---- Kflu�Head Lake . CQP CT. COPE AVF. Q AVE. C60 Kell AVE. ,...�. LARK a AVE. 1 Ike 25 CO. t0. - LAU . RtE RD. z LAUR a � � . E RD, _... a: I_ELANt� RO � < � ... _. - � SAND H�1R�T . � � � . z Fn AVE. MaKE Cr. o JUN TIO�i A1IE. ' B Y Co. Rte. �' � �`� k v. � �. � . ARK MIS: F 4 '°�'�` C BURKE AVE_ . AVE. a ''T -.. ELD IDGE /Y �, John G*w ent LOCATION MAP 3 4 N Attachment 2 VADNAIS HEIGHTS - - - - COUNTY ROAD D- - 430.6 97' 75' 54' C4 I` d — W , j �— p C4 �21 t30 02 S.reS ac. 2. (clac. I rl I � o I o O' i ' _ lOO i0 0 1320 :• f:f:: i:f �r f '::= !' 4 r ....,. =f: SITE 00 ) 3110 } 3090 k A lf W10 ­40 k to- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP a 4 N n Attachment 3 t. / .. - - - -- ------ - - - - -- r-- .--------------- . - - - r -- - ------------r--•----- --ilE------------------------------- mm afrim w -- 5893_0_'37'E 566.50 -_ Naamm GiiaO I 1 MATOW EX16 ING ON mm DPW r0 X DIW"*Aa* MCAOWLAY - -- m Ge a, 1 _ RIMeselliJ I O � C.OnG G11m eX QLVeRT 1 !Td! FLANTIIa TO Ex ¢IT{!f-Ihcm CURD C - NO 1 m�f�' -0' ML R°PLA" fusTG "m av I NW ILLUMINATED sIOM CW" LI4dCE. �- Rg "cqqn'T7lr vim AG �m G ATE L sU1#ACE M _ - - -rr ( A" 2"D - 4 T aesa % - 1 - - - --•- =00 -- - -•- -- .13 arscs re>< - -- r -- - - - - - - -• - -- - _ - - - -- / I � A 1 _ l„ \ EX CULVERT / IL 21 {�'•�' -m , IZ Vi /• /.., ;i..,:/..,.i. •/. �. �� \ �.• , 3 IR .. FM�OF'QSEC eu lL pMG. • ,a, / I 1 / env i. ., /. .,./..i./.. / :/. ' ' .. '/ . .. ... WALL See WIL Ire /T I 1 lie / L y \ R / ^� / , ti Re - / Q 6 • m� FC C: .5_ `� Fc �/' i3 � ^s / � / J9714 "w 40.E ' - - _ {oe* oF+AauE 'or 406 1 S) wl�12 PLOW" / l"ISTaa w%ol aola" TR:I To RimAN E7RNt LrE1GAQN Ti1Q t0 Oe IRMOVEp � � / E1e "Ift Decx:u 17s I TO RM" SITE PLAN �' � l}IIST1116 DeCAOUOIM TiE'� TO e+E �� ` C.• i.f_l.r_ 7 t . NEW OEGIDYOtIS T"eE KE Y NOTES: V EXSrG eIT"*40.6 SURFACE - REMOVE Neu 1rE110 mew T1ll O. RVIOVE EWMPIOR 03W POLES fb TW16) ) ALL DISTR1040 AAKAS t0 DE *CEO= OR OCCOM Y NOT= O EXSrG CONCRETE WALK - REMOVE A 9WOTM4 TIEM F491KP4= - a 14M T1RC6 Ft.AM= / SLO"A !.I AND OVER To RtcsIVE lM=KH MPs O EXS T'G BUILDING - 1 papa 'M IW MAN SEP W ALL 60D AND FLAW?Wj A11E46 - O EXSrG SWED - REMOVE EXST'G KENNEL - REMOVE O ' EXST'G RETANMO WALL - REMOVE E'XSrG FLAG POLE - I@MOVE (9) REMOVE EXbr'G DRvEWAY ENTRANCE i0 Nw BITUMINOUS CURB - SEE 11 EXST'G CONCRETE PAO - REMOVE - I EXSM GARAGE - REMOVE ^ 3 NEW CONCRETE C ."S - SEE H I NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK s' TWICK W/ MEW. 10' -8' WIDE. 51 FINt6W =NrROL JTS 4' -0 Or- / EXP JTS 20' -46' Or- 15 RANO1CAr 3 6V4 - SE I6 25' SITE L{GWr P01.E (TYPE 1) - SEE' e I 1� NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK A' TI.WICK W/ MEW. 6' -0' WIDE. BROGM FIIJI6W CONTROL JTS s' -0' O.C. / EXP JTS 20' -0' O.C- 1$ NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK A' TWICK W/ MEW. 4' -4)' WIDE. BROOM FIN16W CONTROL JTS A' -0' O.G. / EXP JTS 20' -0' Ojr_ SITE PLAN 5 4 N Attachment 4 �J Ir J(• ! APPRO)UTAATE LOCATION FOR OUST 4" SANITARY SIRVICE (FIELD WRIF'Y LOCATION. ELEVATION. SIB. PIPE SIB TYPICAL ^-. - - - - CUT ExiST1NG 81Tt1AIINOUS - - - - -- - - - AND BLEND NEW SIT INTO ,:� � k .y AND EXTEND EXISTING 81T _.DUSTING BIT CiIRB PAST C8 /Z;:; j - --S89 50'37 E ' 566.60 -- __ EQIO SERVICE AS - -- + � p N � E ' EDEO TO MAT two na +.t . !1.RyCE eX �p�• 7 . {.r=-- a•�.:.,..�._ ' -- -_ _.� ^ , f i �.� -• E'It t7JL +�l!i •� � •-•- � _ � 3:r�Y1t ` - _ __ _...i- • -_'_ �.'. -. _ , t � j._ 1 � � �l � 1 % " � - " •-��..•� y - 910' . +: L� • _ i �•. '♦ - _9f 0.��- -�•� j `! 1 r • `j % �� Cam"''.!•! `•_, c ii 1 � 1 j• t �''•♦'Sar � - � �` �♦ � - ._ "`��•� \ ` I `� ••t t �'� • Y•. I i i . S r- `'�C \ 1 _� _._ � _.. �- -- •` - � ,. ter. �T�.� .a.. -�-s- - �- `'. - ''r =. ♦ 1 .Q,T -•' y �• + ,'• 4��.7 --•♦ ` r v' 6 1 •S1• 1 _ y_ i ?rE -� �• ^'I R '. i F1e7� i '� 3 i 7 li • t • } ♦ a CL .+wler U ; ". , �`. �5 G ' • j t �' s '� j 1 it '.. .• � / 1 1 t y t l° `I 1 w � •� ! r .r 1 I RJt FIIk �•`'!tc+r PgO „' P.U�ED FTE=31 `100 I + � � •.� t1 :. �k: � � • 't I :1. :'ef:.. 1 ��.i •1 ` �� t ., � •� � � �' ' � I ` ` ', �, • � f ! i\S1tRF. Ilk. f L•.. �` '' =.,wl . t rla> sr :� 1 . -s�"^' tr --,, "_'.j- to i :/ 1'1 r ` r i I � r I s '� "lNP.. i• y ANNlIL - ` � � y ..�/ r , tY.� '� � 1 1 '.. • ,f; -;� �-�^� 1 n � �/ =� / i�' / t / / � J ,I :1, �O.:i ; ` f ,' W '�:'�t�0� 1 / , - :4.- ` i i %� i � . � .1 i i i•` .,�, ♦' ';' .� ;.,:SS/�(_ -' `� f !'/ � I J T '��! , �� ` 4 � l � 7�a -� .. � � ,� �.{ 7' •z ' � , :, .1 {�� r •l f ..ti- v.'S.• ; `� ; � ' ; y �_� '_ j�G.� J ��^ A - i ce : T� w i �/ !! i %,/ jJ` ~? 1 + .J l` , N �y. .: hri •��� • •1� : !' N I f -; • f .. !{ \ ` 1 • :� ( , •. /- / r /` � / i i 1 r \ t;►• • f , I ' Y y iJ =y I ' �'r! ;~ 7 �,. •.� ` ' J / �'� / 1 ' ��••. i� `.` I ' �: I t ,. 1 ' • 1� t r i ... 5 ; ! ~!j t I r � ' -. ::t. ; - `- ' 't '�..! 1••, ^l ' `(` t.•°:' • � i' ,: � t I` 1 � a � 7 t•.' T_ t / � I % * i I . � L , `• ti S. ry, •r- ` ( t / ! ' � f r' t � � _ ' ..�s I I f ,+ � ` � f � 1 • t � �;: ,� ;•L' t' _' j C .� t" ! !+ it`"ti��` z `r"'_�J�� -._r .._'•,^ ;y / i L 1 z �,�,� •�••'� •i1F•. !` '�IE3S j `•!•.. ` �` _`•`.. J i � i:�'�. � J ! 1 s1tt � `�:. � � �. ! /• Z..F!�.. - -� � . -.._.. •I I ' I 1 ♦ , /f ,/ 1 .�/ j t Q •{ 1 ..� '• , .•! ` ' ` w • • t•. �: 1' . • ems. r- C' l.� J a i r ; / I • f ;r � 0 • " 1 `� �� ! Ott '�. I t , .`' I I , p It 1 t ~ i ' ♦/ _ ` :� ♦ i 4 �/ /' .p , I /' 1 1 •.�!• Z ,A .1 ' ••' : to _ _. r , - 1 t `. ' : is w •� t /! r 3t I t 1 i i - i t e • t TAR .� _ ` ` ° �4r `� 1 :V`: - , .• i /, �{ -• .a•aj�,j !!!!!! a t are •Il /'�f •-.a :. - aL �.;, ,;� Est - j ,. ! I 1 7 + ice` / ! ! w' ', i i i ' • , , I , I • I I 1 , j o Ir W All I IF PROPOSED GRADING PLAN 6 Attachment 5 D4RK 3ROWN �� ���C1•�Q�».�, .. P•+ • � 4 ,` • gin'. �1..4r t^ :•. ,. .��� RED �..� _ !\• :. 1:�' ; +�:.» , ':,�I . . ' 4 :.+; IL ■ KNEE f E ate. L ♦l.I,d'1. RIxED WINDOW Af° dSf�+a1.T SF+IPKsl.ES . DARK BROWN .iJ� ,.s..; •.-^ :\' .'i �'�:'+' _:I.,.:,- .•••.— `. T _ _s• — — .+ ; i, \ �.• r 1. _ T.. _ � _ _ _ — REVEAL 77 - n w•,. .•J ..��� '.�: '�Lf ''�`- ' a .. L'�' : : {i . +. •.,. .:f ' y. '•::.:. ':•.: :t «`:���:'ti .:��: +• ^.'�;.._►.,. 'WINDOW' "' _ .r �': :�� +:,-'' 'i. - »:. •:I. M. .:J•.7 ���� : J`- '�. ^• • . ' \. - ` r •''•' _..� i. •r - 4 ► •� .1 Ci 1 ` .71 " ,•a• WCNE SILL DECORATIVE MSCNRr ORClW 3 NORTH L VAT 1 ON �d V8' •I'.m' BUILDING ELEVATIONS t Attachment 6 12 A 1 STCN DECORATIVE t afROI N I 1 i iiJi i LL 11 � � 2 WEST ELEVATION � ve•.r -a• Y NOTr=� TO' ELEVATI S 12 O STU= 'A • CREAM �H B STUCCO 'B' - OROUN ASPI SNINGLE3 oara� ROLPI Ga STUCCO •C• - SecaE METAL LOUvER. PREFINISWE0 1 s' 2 STUCCO �._._..._. • . .. REVEAL J 1__ ,•• r REVEAL. SIUCCC w; ;' -< t ` �:�::: ,;:. . -�• .... ,, �: - - STONE SILL 1 I 1 I I ALUM. PIXEL DECORATIVE MASONRY ,SST EL.EVATION 4 Zia• _ r. ©• ' BUILDING ELEVATIONS 8 4 N Attachment 7 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 25, 2002 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 02 -06 1. 7:00 Hillcrest Animal Hospital (1320 County Road D) A. Conditional Use Permit B. Design Approval a. City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. Assistant Community .Development Director Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Trippler presented the Planning Commission report from the March 4, 2202 meeting. d. Boardmember Olson presented the Community. Design Review Board report from the March 12, 2002 meeting. e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents. or opponents. The following persons were heard: Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, Hillcrest Animal Hospital, 1320 County Road D f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the following resolution adopting a conditional use permit to build a new animal hospital that would be closer than 350 feet to a residential district at 1320 County Road D: Resolution 02 -03 -035 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Dr. Jennifer Bouthilet, of Hillcrest Animal Hospital, applied for a conditional use permit to construct a building in the M -1 (light manufacturing zoning district) closer than 350 feet to property zoned for residential. WHEREAS, this pp rn ermit applies to the property on the southwest comer of Highway 61 and p County Road D. The legal descriptions are: 1322 County Road D Legal Description SUBJECT TO HWY &ROAD: PART NLY OF A LINE BEG ON WL OF NW 1/4 OF SEC 3 183.55 FT S OF NW CORNER TO POINT ON CL OF HWY 613 23.3 6 FT SWLY FROM INT OF HWY 61 & NL OF SAID NW 1/4 &THERE TERMINATING AND EASTERLY OF LINE BEGINING ON SAID DESC LINE 183 FT SELY FROM WL OF SAID NW 1/4 TO POINT ON NL OF SAID NW 1/4 257.50 FT EAST OF SAID NW 1/4 CORNER &THERE TERMINATING IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29, .RANGE 22 (PIN 03- 29 -22 -22 -0008) 1320 County Road D Legal Description 9 NORTH 223 FEET OF E 5 FEET AT N TO 15 FEET AT S OF N 741 FT SUBJECT TO ROAD • . THE T NLY OF A LINE BEG ON W L OF. NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 3 183.5 5 OF SECTION 4, ALSO PAR . FT S NW CORNER TO- POINT INT ON CENTERLINE OF HWY 61 323.36 FT SWLY FROM INT OF HWY 61 & NL OF SAID NW 1/4. & THERE TERMINATING AND WLY OF LINE BEG ON SAID DESC LINE 183 FT SELY FROM WL OF SAID NW 1/4 TO POINT ON NL OF SAID NW 1/4 257.50 FT E OF SAID NW 1/4 CO R & THERE TERMINATING IN. SECTION 3; TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22 (PIN 03- 29 -22 -22 -0009) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: planning commission. recommended that t 1. On March 4, 2002, the p g he city council approve the conditional use permit for the proposed osed animal hospital. p p p . 2002.. City staff published a notice in the paper 2. The city council held a public hearing on March 25, y p surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave every and sent notices to the sumo g p p y one eak and resent written statements. The council also considered reports at the hearing a chance to sp p recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. and recomm y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained constructed and operated to be in conformity with the ci ty p 's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any a ctivit y, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or excessive noise glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes., water or air pollution, property, because of , drainage, water runoff, vibration , general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. ' facilities d services including streets, police and fire 6. The use would structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks be served by adequate public an g tion draina . protection, g 7. The use would .not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. the reservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features 8. The use would maximize p into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: plan approved b the city. The director of community 1. All construction shall follow the site p pp Y . . or changes. This a roval also includes the proposed future addition development may approve min g pp shown on the west side of the new hospital. 10 ' substantially started within one year of council approval or the 2. The proposed construction must be substan y . p ' null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. permit shall become nu 3. The city council shall review this. permit in one year. erties into one parcel for tam .and identification purposes 4. The owner shall combine the two prop before the city issues a building permit. plan for providing water to the site before the city issues a 5. The city and the owner shall agree to a certificate of occupancy - for the new hospital, subject to the fire marshal's approval. 6. There shall not be any outdoor storage unless the city council approves a conditional use permit for outdoor. storage. ?. The applicant meeting all the conditions and plan changes .required by the city engineer. ' work with staff to add signage on the retainin 8. Applicant. shall w g wall. Seconded by Councllmember Koppen Ayes -All • e the laps date -stam ed Febru 12 2002 for the Councllmember Wasiluk moved to approv_ p l lowin &. p roposed Hillcrest Animal Hos ital at 13 2 0 Count Ro ad D . The owner shall do the fo • a building ermit for this project. 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued g p e the cit issues a building permit: 2. Submit the following for staff approval before ty • all meet all the requirements of e utilit and erosion control plans. The plans shall • a. Grading, drainage, Y re the new driveway of the ' The utility laps shall provide a fire hydrant where the city engineer. y p hospital meets County Road D. . design. .The li ht fixtures must have lighting plan showing the light spread and fixture • g b. A site lig g p residents concealed lenses and bulbs to properly shield g . lare from the res 3. Submit revised plans for CDRB approval as follows: a. The landscape plan shall include additional landscaping on the north and the east sides of the building (especially in front, of the dog run) and the code - required screening on the west side of the parking lot and driveway. b. The retaining wall plan shall include the retaining wall shown with a minimum of a two foot step or breaking in tiers with landscaping located above the tiers. Any wall that is more than four feet tall requires - a building permit .issued by the 'city. 4. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install a handicap-parking sign for the handicap- parking space. an in-ground s ped areas. C. Install and maintain gr sprinkler system for all landsca ' p 11l • feet. and the employee spaces at 9 feet. all customer parking spaces at a width of 9 1/2 f d Stripe p • allow. temporary occupancy if: 5. If any required work is not done, the city may or pY ' the a. The city etermines that the work is not essential to public health, safety or welfare. p Y credit for the re uired work. The The city receives cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of q , b. T Y k. An unfinished landscaping . amount shall be 150 of the unfinished work. y • am percent of the cost p . 'din is ed in the fall or winter, or. within six weeks shall be completed by June 1 if the buil g occu i p the building is occu of occupancy.if g occupied .in the spring or summer. p Y ' c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. . ' apply for sign permits with staff. i s are not art of this approval. The applicant pp y gn p 6. S gn p ' ' the west side of the hospital. This 7. This design a royal does not include the future addition on • • pp ' before the city issues a building permit for the addition. addition must be -approved by the city tY 8. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development- may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmemb er C llins Ayes-All 12 Q MEMORANDUM Agenda # TO: City Manager FROM: DuWayne K.onewko, Environmental Health Official SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review — Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall LOCATION: 925 Century Avenue North DATE: March..5, 2003 INTRODUCTION The conditional use p ermit for the Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall is due for review by the city council. The conditional use permit was for the expansion of the Kingdom Hall with a building addition and a parking lot expansion. Refer to the maps on pages 2 -4. BACKGROUND J On January 22, 2001, the city council approved a conditional use permit for the Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall.. Refer to the conditions of approval on page 5. The council also approved a 1, 1 20-square-foot addition, a 24- by 24 -foot two -car garage, a parking lot expansion and. the closure of the south driveway. The city council also requested a review of this permit in one year. On March 11, 2002, the city council requested a review of this permit in one year to ensure compliance with plans. Refer to the city council minutes on page 6. DISCUSSION The applicant has complied with the conditions of the conditional use permit. The landscaping is p complete, and there are no outstanding issues. RECOMMENDATION Review' -the conditional use p ermit for Jehovah's Witnesses Kingdom Hall at 925 Century Avenue North again only if a problem arises or if a revision to the conditional use permit is proposed. p:sec25 \jehovahswitaesses Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line and Address Map 3. Site Plan 4. CUP conditions dated January 22, 2001 5. March 11, 2002 City Council Minutes ATTACHMENT J Tor"" Lair i L ATTACHMENT 2 LL 7T .43 H A RY ESTE 4 ..E-- F , { •':.j ?.a I �,•. ..p'.�•i:, +:i y t , . .-ri {.e.. ♦ i+i 'S �t`a, _i S ` , r- 9-53- - ; i ' •� f ��• iii �{ k.. L t ' � • �- �.� � . � . t` C om. co co ; w ( to .; to co ca ti 1 N N N N_ .9 5� E H O �lA H' S �. J WITNESSES KI N G D iVl HAL L Co I 26.69 C4 ME _E._._.. __ �..z701- 27071 -�-- 8.95- - - - -� _ «.__.. ------- __________ ____ ______ ___ __ ______._._______ ------- __________...__. _.B RAN D -ST 017 • � *•,.+"Lh' ;, �:i -,ice =; !! �. F N U, t i ! W ' >. .2712 ; 2668.. I - L Z LU 4 N ATTACHMENT 3 s PROPOSED ADDITION 40MQW z ,.. 1 •�,.� . lU 1. 1 ' _# 1 �• � U RCH ,...,.. , r. ► ►. ; ; J ; j f! r lid Z i Lu G :< T EXPANS ION . j 4 N ATTACHMENT 7. The use would- not create excessive additional. costs, for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic* features into the development design*. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. , Approval is subject to the following conditions: I. All construction renovations and improvements shall follow the site plan a . roved by the city. The director of community development -may PP approve minor changes. 2: The ro osed use must be substantially started' within one year of council P P Y approval or the permit shall become.null and void. The council. may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. Site ligh shall only be used when needed at night. for services or other church functions. They shall not be on all night.. : Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Councilmember Allens ach moved to antirove the '] 1 date- stam�edNovember . P d re d 12y Q cQde and subjQc to* thQ follo is based olithe fin conditions Repeat this review in two ears if the.ci .has not issued. a building permit 1. Rep y city .has this project. Z. Before obtainin g a building, permit for the addition, the. property owner shall provide the following for staff approval: a. A site-lighting plan which shows.`the proposed lighting fixtures (a g gP P P "shoe box" st yle fixture that fully conceals the lens and bulb is a preferred referred style), the light intensity (code limits the . maximum light intensity to .4 foot candles at a residential property line) and the extent of light cast. b. Revised site and .landscape plans showing: 5. -0 A TTACH`1 5 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 11, 2002 Council Chambers; Municipal Building Meeting No. 02 -05 1. Conditional .Use Permit Review— Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall (925 Century Avenue North) conditional use permit for Jehovah's Witness Kingdom Hall, 925 Century Avenue North in . Review the c and p g _ one year. 6 Agenda Action by Council Date . Endc sal WOWMM Modified MEMORANDUM Rejected TO: City Manager FROM: Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Resolution of Support- CDBG Funds for Beaver Creek Carriage Homes (Ferndale Street) DATE: March 24, 2002 INFORMATION The Beaver Creek Carriage Homes Association is asking the city council for support to apply for for $250,000 in low- interest loans from Ramsey County CDBG funds. The funds will be used to rehabilitate 60 condominium homes . and garages at 1215, 1225 and 1235 Ferndale Street. If funded, the project will preserve existing affordable housing that is at least 70% low and moderate income. A letter from the President of the Homeowners Association is attached which g ives more detail and information about the project and request. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that p ou ass the Resolution of Support for the Beaver Creek Carriage Y Homes CDBG application. p: com_ dvpt \misc \BeaverCreek.cover.memo Attachments 1. Letter dated March 7, 2003 2. Resolution of Support Attachment 1 BEAVER CREEK CARRIAGE HOMES ASSOCIATION March 7, 2003 Ms. Melinda Coleman Assistant City Manager /Community Development Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County B Maplewood, MN 55009 RE: Beaver Creek Carriage Homes CDBG Loan Application Dear Ms. Coleman: As we discussed, the Beaver Creek Carriage Homes Association has made application to Ramsey Cou nt y for a low - interest loan of $250,000, from CDBG funds, to preserve and rehabilitate 60 condominium homes and garages at 1215,. 1 ' 225, 1235 Ferndale. Street North in central Maplewood Mar p (on y Ma land Avenue between Century Avenue and Lakewood Drive). These funds will be used to p reserve affordable housing for a community that is, at least, 70% low and moderate= income homeowners. A p complete copy of our application for this loan is enclosed. The "Project Narrative" summarizes the nature of and need for the improvements. It also gives a brief history of our needs assessment and the application process. The "Project Summary" provides a very succinct description of the proposed project. The application provides a detailed description of the entire P p p project. The Board of Directors of the Association believes that the support of the City. of Maplewood is important. Ve would very much. appreciate it if the City Council would acknowledge the value of affordable, owner-occupied condominiums to low and moderate - income residents of the City. We further ask that- the City Council support our application for this below market -rate loan to preserve the 60 homes in our community. This support encourage ort would a the Ramsey County Board to approve our request for- this loan and . g undertake this unique pilot project to preserve owner - occupied condominiums. This would be q the first CDBG J ro loan in Ramsey County to finance improvements to owner - occupied p multi -famil y homes. All previous loans have been used either for single - family homes or multi - y famil rental units. There are no other applications in the County that are competing directly project. p p with this pilot • ect. This is a unique opportunity to develop a framework to meet similar needs of those livin g in the many older condominium.- housing units throughout the County. 2 Ms. Melinda Coleman March 7, 2003 Page two The application is being reviewed now by the County staff and must be considered by the County Board in early May. So, it is important that we move quickly. Please refer this request to the City Council as soon as possible. If you need any additional information, please call me at (651) 436 -5090 (daytime) or call Scott Bailey at Bailey Enterprises, Inc. We would be happy to meet with you and /or attend the City Council meeting to explain and support this request. Thank you very much for your attention to this request. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Ve truly yours, Laurence E. Whittaker, President Board of Directors Beaver Creek Carriage Homes Association C/o Bailey Enterprises, Inc. 484 North Wabasha St. Paul, MN 55102 (651'-224-5482 0 Attachment 2 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR A CDBG PRO COUNTY JECT LOAN FROM RAMS VER CREEK CARRIAGE HOMES FOR THE BEA • ciation has applied to Ramsey County for a AS the Beaver Creek Carriage Homes Asso p -WHERE Community Development Block Grant funds; low-interest loan in the amount of $254,000 in C ' Y low i • Association would use this money WHEREAS, the Beaver Creek Carriage Homes As to preserve Ferndale and rehabilitate 60 condominiu W H E located at 1215, 1225 and 1.235 m homes and garages . Street North; ' re-side and re -roof the garages and three these funds would be used to repair, re side it and WHEREAS, urther, these funds would residential buildings with 60 condominium units. ld be used to repa curit /intercom system • • Green the trash enclosures and replace the se y refinish decks, relocate and s .in three buildings; - -- mai- ntain -- -e - -- -- - -- -lap improvements will all — afe - blight in a� hig -tra -1c ar -ea, of WHEREAS, these p housing and generally enhance the quality tax base and reserve 60 units of affordable g . property p income condominium neighborhood. life for the owners of this low to moderate inc • needed im rovements and ood Cit Council supports these plans for p WHEREAS, the Maplewood y. . request to Ramsey County for CDBG funding; supports this q . Council hereby expresses their THEREFORE, BE IT RESO LVED, that the Maplewood City Cou y • Carriage Homes Association to undertake h Bav this loan be ranted to the eer Creek C i g this support that g and rehabilitation of affordable, uni ue pilot program for the preservation a Maplewood. ble, q idents of the City of condominiums for low and mod erate income res The Maplewood City Council p 'I ado ted this resolution on . March 31 2003. p: com_ dvpt \miscell \BeaverC reek. res. doc El AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Human Resource Director RE: Retiree Health Savings Plan Revision DATE: March 13, 2003 BACKGROUND AGENDA NO. Actl on by C ounc il Date Endorsed Modified Rejected � In June of 2002, the IRS provided a ruling that affects Retiree Health Savings Plans.. The most significant change resulting from the IRS ruling is a change to the Death Benefit. In December of 2002, we amended the funding formula for the non -union employees to improve the program for these employees based on the ruling. We have now completed our work with our plan administrators to ensure our plan complies with the tax code changes as outlined by the IRS. This resolution amends our plan to incorporate those changes. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution amending the City's VantageCare Retirement Health Savings Plan. RESOLUTION AMENDING A VANTAGECARE RETIREMENT HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN Plan Number: 800183 Name of Employer: City of Maplewood State: MN Resolution of the City of Maplewood ( "Employer ") WHEREAS, the Employer has employees rendering valuable services; and WHEREAS, the Employer has established a retiree health savings plan in the form of the VantageCare Retirement Health Savings Plan (the "Plan ") for such employees that serves the interest of the Employer by enabling it to provide reasonable security regarding such employees' health needs during retirement, by providing increased flexibility in its personnel management system, and by assisting in the attraction and retention of competent personnel; and WHEREAS, the Employer has determined that the continuance of the Plan serves the above objectives; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Employer hereby amends and restates the Plan as outlined in the attached Declaration of Amendment to the VantageCare Retirement Health Saving Plan; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assets of the Plan shall be held in trust, with the Employer serving as trustee ( "Trustee ") for the exclusive benefit of Plan participants and their beneficiaries, and the assets of the Plan shall not be diverted to any other purpose prior to the satisfaction of all liabilities of the Plan. The Employer hereby amends the June 24, 2002 Declaration of Trust of the City of Maplewood Integral Part Trust. AYES: NAPES: ABSENT: City Clerk ATTACHMENT C DECLARATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE VANTAGECARE RETIREMENT HEALTH SAVINGS PLAN Plan Number: 8 0 0 1 8 3 Name of Employe-, City of Maplewood State: MIA The Employer is amending its VantageCare Retirement Health Savings (RHS) Plan to incorporate the provisions selected below. Section numbers refer to the appropriate section of the VantageCare RHS Adoption Agreement. Part I: Addition of New Participation and Contribution Features: Complete Part I if you wish to add the new participation and /or contribution features to your RHS plan. Effective Date: 12/09/02 (insert effective date of amendment). V. Eligible Groups and Participant Eligibility Requirements Use this section to allow your employees to choose to participate in the RHS program. If you do not select this option, participation will continue to be mandatory for the employee group (s) named in your original RHS Adoption Agreement. If you choose this option, employees that do not opt to participate in RHS will not receive mandatory contributions or be allowed to choose to make elective employee contributions (see Se , '-ion VI) . Irrevocable Election to Participate 171 If this box is checked, in lieu of mandatory participation, the Employer provides for a ore -time irrevocable election by eligible Employees to participate in RHS. Until such time as the election is made, the Employee shall not participate in the Plan or receive contributions pursuant to section VI of the RHS Adoption Agreement. Newly eligible Employees shall be provided an election window of days (no more than 60 calendar days) from the date of initial eligibility during which they may make the election to participate. Participation may begin no earlier than the calendar month following the end of the election window. If the Employee does not make the election in the year of initial eligibility, the election to partici- pate may be made in a later year. An annual election window of days (no more than 60 calendar days) shall be provided during which the election may be made. The election win- dow shall run from to (insert your annual time frame for the election win- dow, e.g. October 1 to November 29) . Participation may begin no earlier than the calendar year fol- lowing the year of the election. Once made, the election is irrevocable and may not be revoked while the participant is a member of the group covered by the RHS plan. 7 Plan Number: 8 1 0 0 8 3 71 2. Mandatory Leave Contributions: The Employer will make mandatory contributions of leave as follows: Accrued Sick Leave* 171 Yes No Accrued Vacation* 171 Yes 171 No Other (describe)* ACCt^Ued annual leave and 171 Yes 171 No personal holiday * Please provide the formula for determining the accrued leave contribution: See Attachment #1 An Employee shall not have the right to discontinue or vary the rate of mandatory leave contribu- tions. 713. Mandatory Employee Compensation Contributions: The Employer will make mandatory contributions of Employee compensation as follows: Reduction in Salary - % of earnings (as defined in VI.A.1.) or $ will be contributed for the Plan Year. Decreased Merit or Pay Plan Adjustment - All or a portion of the Employees' annual merit or pay plan adjustment will be contributed as follows: An Employee shall not have the right to discontinue or vary the rate of mandatory contributions of Employee compensation. B. Elective Contributions: If you wish to provide for elective contributions, complete sections 1 and /or 2 as appropriate. 1. The Employer will permit each Employee to make the following elections to make pre -tax contri- butions to the Plan: a. Irrevocable Election for Pre -Tax Contributions from Compensation: Aone -time, irrevocable election of the amount of Employer contributions of compensation made on his or her behalf. G Plan Number: 8 0 0 1 8 3 c. Annual Prospective Election for Pre -Tax Contributions of Leave: An annual, irrevocable elec- tion to have his or her 171 sick 171 vacation 71 other (describe) leave to be accrued in the next calendar year, contributed to the Plan on his or her behalf. Contributions of future leave accruals will be remitted to the Plan 71 as earned 171 at the end of the calendar year The election to contribute must be made in the calendar year before the year in which contributions are to begin. Once made, the election shall apply to succeeding calendar years unless otherwise revised or revoked by the Employee on an annual basis. An annual election window of days (no more than 60 calendar days) is provided during which. eligible Employees may make the election to contribute. The election window shall run from to of the year prior to the year contributions of leave will begin (insert your annual time frame for the election window). The Employer limits the amount elected as shown below: In adopting section a, b, and /or c, the Employer acknowledges that the Internal Revenue Service has not ruled on irrevocable election contributions in an integral part trust. ICMA -RC has obtained the advice of counsel that such contributions are allowable under the conditions outlined in this Adoption Agreement. The Employer should discuss this issue with appropriate counsel. 17 2. Voluntary After -Tax Contributions: Each Employee ma contribute u to % of Y P earnings (as defined in VI.A.1.) or $ for the Plan Year on a voluntary after -tax basis. In no event may aggregate Employee voluntary after -tax contributions exceed 25% of total contri- butions in any Plan Year. An Employee shall have the right to discontinue or vary the rate of voluntary after -tax contributions of Employee earnings. In adopting tills s(, don, the Employer acknowledges that the Internal Revenue Service has declined to rule on Employee after -tax contributions in an integral part trust. ICMA -RC has obtained the advice of counsel that such contributions are allowable in an insubstantial amount (i.e. no more than 25% of total contributions in any Plan Year) . The Employer should discuss this issue with appropriate counsel. C. Limits on Contributions: Use this section to define your overall maximum contributions for all contribution types you selected. (Limits on individual contribution types are defined within the appropriate sections above.) 11 Plan Number: 8 n --a _.1. _8- -1 XI. Death Benefit In the event of a Participant's death, the following shall apply: Account Transfer: The surviving spouse and /or surviving eligible dependents (as defined in Section XIII.F.) of the deceased Participant are immediately eligible to maintain the account and utilize it to fund eligible medical benefits specified in Section X above. Upon notification of a Participant's death, the Participant's account balance will be transferred into the Vantagepoint Money Market Fund *. The account balance may be reallocated by the surviving spouse or dependents. * Please read the current prospectus carefully prior to investing. An investment in this fund is neither insured nor guaranteed and there can be no assurance that the Fund will be. able to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share. Vantagepoint Mutual Funds are distributed by ICMA -RC Services, LLC, a controlled affiliate of ICMA Retirement Corporation. Member NASD /SIPC. If a Participant's account balance has not been fully utilized upon the death of the eligible spouse, the account balance may continue to be utilized to pay benefits of eligible dependents. Upon the death of all eligible dependents, the balance will be available for medical benefits for the designated beneficiary of g P . the last dependent or - spouse to die. Assets remaining upon the death of a designated beneficiary shall be available for medical benefits of the beneficiary's designated beneficiary. If there is no living beneficiary(ies), the account will revert to the Plan to be applied as specified in Section VIII. There will be no elective withholding of federal, state, or local taxes for medical benefit payments to the Participant's spouse's or dependent's designated beneficiary (les). If there are no living spouse or dependents at the time of death of the Participant, the account will be available for medical benefits for the designated beneficiary(ies) of the Participant. Assets remaining upon the death of all designated beneficiaries shall be available for medical benefits of the beneficiary's benefi- ciary. If there is no living beneficiary(ies), the account will revert to the Plan to be applied as specified in SectlonVlll. There will be no elective withholding of federal, state, or local taxes for medical benefit payments to the Participant's beneficiary(ies) or any beneficiary's beneficiary. XII. Termination Prior to Benefit Eligibility This section replaces the Severance Feature previously included in Section XII. In the case of a Participant's termination of employment in advance of retirement (as defined in Section VII.C.) or prior to becoming eligible for medical benefits under the plan (as defined in Section IX.), the 13 ATTACHMENT #1 R HS PLAN FOR NON -UNION EMPLOYEES Amended by City Council on December 9, 2002 1. Participant and benefit eligibility criteria: Must be full -time employee, no minimum or maximum age and no years of service requirement. 2. Benefits will be limited to insurance premiums only (health, dental, long -term care premiums, Medicare Part B, and Medicare supplements). 3. The RHS plan will be funded by severance pay as follows: a. 100% of eligible severance pay for sick leave and deferred sick leave would be deposited into the RHS plan if the employee is age 50 or above at the time of separation from service. b. 100% of accrued annual leave and personal holidays would be deposited into the RHS plan if the employee's balance is at least 80 hours at the time of separation from service and the employee is at least age 50. If under 80 hours or under age 50, nothing would go in. c. 100 % of accrued vacation and personal holidays would be deposited into the RHS plan if the employee is at least age 50 and their vacation balance is at lease 80 hours at the time of separation from service. If under 80 hours or age 50, nothing would go in. 4. The RHS plan will be funded with annual deposits as follows: a. Employees who are eligible for annual leave and are at least age 50, will have the cash value of 16 hours of annual accrued but unused annual leave deposited into the RHS plan if the annual leave balance is at least 240 hours on the last payroll in December. In addition, there would be an annual deposit of the cash value of all hours over 300 hours - as of the last payroll in December. (Under the first part of this provision, if an employee uses all of their annual accrual in a particular year, nothing will go into the plan that year. If they use all but 10 hours, the 10 would go in.) b. Employees that have a vacation balance of 160 or more hours on the last payroll in December, and are at least age 45, will have the cash value of 16 hours of annual accrued but unused vacation deposited into the RHS plan. In addition, employees of any age will have the cash value of all vacation hours in excess of the carryover limit (1.'5 times annual accrual) deposited into the RHS plan. (If an employee uses all the vacation they earn that year or their balance did not exceed the carryover limit, nothing would go in.) c. All employees will have the cash value of all personal holiday hours unused as of December 31 deposited into the RHS plan. AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT Action bycil f TO: Richard Fursman Date _ Endorsed. City Manager oified FROM: Sherrie Le .-- Rejected Human Resource Director RE: -Maplewood 2003 Shape Up Challenge DATE: March 17, 2003 Medica, our employee health insurance provider, recently invited us to participate in a special wellness program developed by the American Heart Association. The program is called the Shape Up Challenge,. What is the Shape U Challenge? It is a worksite wellness campaign that provides information Up and incentives to employees who earn .points for behaviors that improve their physical, mental and social health. It is a six -week program held from April 7 to May 18, 2003. The Shape Up Challenge encourages healthy behaviors, improved nutrition and fitness, and stress reduction for the artici ants. We recommend the City participate in the program to promote the p p health and wellness of our employees. We feel the City benefits both directly and indirectly in promoting the health and fitness of our workforce. Improved employee health leads to increased productivity and decreased unplanned absences for illnesses and injuries. We also feel it fosters a positive, healthy work environment and promotes teamwork. The program is open to all employees and a more detailed description is attached. Although the primary benefit is the improved health and fitness of our employees, we have developed incentives to encourage participation. Incentives include .weekly drawings for prizes when certain criteria are met along with a grand prize drawing at the end of the six weeks for continuous participation. Participation is defined as earning 200 or more points per week and turning the points in to the team captains by a specific time. We will be providing health education each week to all participants with our weekly newsletter and we will .be competing against other employers for prizes. Medica will be provided materials for the program along with the health education materials. RECOMMENDATION Please submit the Shape Up Challenge to the City Council for their approval. Maplewood Shape Up Challenge Rules 1. Each participant will receive a scorecard to be completed by the individual and turned in at the end of the six -week period. 2. There are 5 categories where participants can earn points. Each checkmark is worth 10 points. B - Balanced Nutrition - Participants must eat 5 servings of fruits and /or vegetables per day to earn the points for the day. L - Lifestyle Activity - Participants must increase their movement to earn points in this area. Examples are walking instead of driving, taking stairs instead of elevators, parking further away, not using the remote control, doing yard work, etc. A - Activity - planned physical exercise. Participants must do 30 minutes of a structured exercise each day to earn points. The 30 minutes can be broken down into three 10- minute sessions, but there is a greater health benefit to exercise for 30 minutes or more at a time. S - Self -Care /Social Connection — Participants must do one self- care /social connection activity each day to earn points. Examples are: Seeing a health -care provider, self - exam, going to lunch with a friend or family member, etc. T - Time to Relax — Participants must do 10 minutes of any relaxation activity to earn points. 3. Participants will put a checkmark in the appropriate daily box if they complete the activity for that day. At the end of the week, add the number of checkmarks for the week, multiply by 10 and report your score to your team captain. Team Captains will then email or phone the points per participants to Bert Darst, Shape . Challenge Coordinator in the Human Resource Department. 4. Those participants who submit their points on time, and who have at least 200 points for the week, will be eligible for the weekly drawing. Those participants who turn in points all six weeks, on time, with a minimum of 200 points per week, will be eligible for the drawing for the grand prize.. If you fall below 200 points during any given week, continue to turn your points into your team captain as you will still be eligible for any remaining weeks where your have earned at least 200 points. There are 350 possible points in each week. 5. PRIZES: Pedometer, 5 free fitness classes at MCC, Gym bag and water bottle, 1 /2 hour massage from Sister Rosalyn's staff at MCC, Sony CD Walkman compliments of Pauline Staples, Casio handheld PDA (handheld computer or Palm - Pilot) — compliments of City Clerk's Office *GRAND PRIZE* - Choice of 8 hours of vacation or annual leave OR $50 gift certificate to Outback Steak House __ P A R 8 T. . AC a r 4- AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Richard Fursman From: Chief of Police David J. Thomalla Subject: Expenditure - Public Safety Dispatching Center Date: March 20, 2003 Intrndi intinn Action by Council niE..:..J.. sed Modified It is proposed that the City Council approve the expenditure of $10,600 for the Public Safety Dispatching Center to complete the installation of the 800 MHz radio consoles. The funds for this expenditure would be part of the money appropriated for the Communications Center renovation. Back, roun Last year the City Council approved a $49,810 appropriation to the Public Safety Dispatching Center Fund from which to make the final purchases for the Communications Center. Upgrading the Communications Center radio system to allow inter - operability with the new Metro 800 MHz system was part of that appropriation. This appropriation lapsed at the end of 2002. As a result of extensive testing of the 800 MHz system and availability of the radio consoles, this project could not be completed in 2002. Additional expenditures totaling $10,600 are needed to proceed with this project to allow inter - connectivity on the Metro 800 MHz system. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve a $10,600 appropriation to the Public Safety Dispatching Center Fund to make this final purchase for the Communications Center. Action Required Submit to the City Council for review and action. DJT: js 4;000 AGENDA ITEM U1 L . AGENDA REPORT, TO: Cit Mana FROM: Ed Nadeau, Utilit Superintendent Chuck Ahl, Director of Public Works/Cit En SUBJECT: Oakdale Sewa A DATE: March 20, 2003 Action b Council E il" 1 M �'d Rejected Introduction The Cit of Maplewood and Cit of Oakdale entered into a on October 14, 1996. . The a allowed Oakdale to conve sanitar sewa into Maplewood's sanitar sewer s Background See attached a with amendment. Recommendation Re the Cit Council to adopt the chan in a with the Cit of Oakdale and file the amended a with the Metropolitan. Council Environmental Services (MCES) for adjusted billin j w Attachment AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as " MAPLEWOOD" and the City of Oakdale, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "OAKDALE." WHEREAS, Oakdale has requested permission from Maplewood to connect a portion of its public sanitary sewer system to the Maplewood sanitary sewer system for the purpose of transporting sanitary sewage from Lift Station 7 service area in Oakdale and the following agreement is intended to reflect the mutual understanding and g agreement to accomplish this purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, Oakdale and Maplewood do hereby mutually agree as follows: . 1. Maplewood does hereby grant permission to Oakdale to connect Oakdale's sanitary sewer conveying sanitary sewage from Lift Station 7 service area in the vicinity of Stillwater Boulevard and TH 120 to the Maplewood sewer system and Maplewood Lift Station 6 located on Lakewood Drive at Beaver Lake. Oakdale shall provide at least 15 -day notice prior to constructing the sewer connection to the Maplewood sewage system and shall allow Maplewood Public Works Department inspectors an opportunity to view the connection before coverin g p u the construction work. Oakdale shall assume all costs connected with the construction of its sanitary sewage system and the connection to the Maplewood lift station and sewer system. 2. The Oakdale sewer system to be connected to the Maplewood sewer system shall be used solely for the purpose of conveying sanitary sewage, and Oakdale shall not permit any storm water runoff to be connected to the sewer system. 3. Oakdale shall be solely responsible for all maintenance, repairs and claims for damages or injuries caused to any person or property whatsoever or from any cause whatsoever relating to the properties or persons served by the Oakdale sanitary sewer. Oakdale agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend Maplewood from any and all claims for damages to persons. or property that arise or that may claim to arise from any reason relating to the sewers owned and maintained by Oakdale and that are hereby authorized to be connected to the Maplewood sewer system. 4. It is agreed between the parties hereto that the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services shall estimate the amount of sanitary sewage attributable to the Oakdale properties hereby authorized to be connected to this Maplewood sewer system and shall accordingly charge Oakdale for its proportionate, cost of sewage treatment, conveyance, and related costs in its annual billings. Oakdale and Maplewood shall cooperate with and provide all necessary information to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services so as to permit the proper billing to Oakdale and credit to Maplewood for this sewage. . 5. Maplewood shall operate and maintain the Maplewood Lift Station 6, and the cost of operation and maintenance shall be shared by Oakdale and Maplewood in the following manner: Oakdale's estimated average daily flow. will be compared to the actual average daily flow for Maplewood Lift Station 6. The actual annual operation and maintenance cost will be shared on a proportionate basis between Oakdale and Maplewood. Oakdale's present estimated daily flow is 62,000 gallons per day as calculated by Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. on April 24, 1996 (Exhibit A). Oakdale may submit documentation to identify a new estimated average daily flow based on changed conditions. Maplewood cannot unreasonably deny a request to adjust the Oakdale estimated average daily flow. Maplewood shall submit an annual billing before March 1 of each year. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT Maplewood has documented there has been a change, in the daily average flows from original agreement. Maplewood has metered daily flows at the point of connection from October 19, 2001, to October 23, 2002. Howard R. Green Company was hired to meter and record data. Maplewood is requesting to adjust average daily flows to reflect new data collected from metering. Maplewood recommends the existing daily average flows be amended to 83,450 gallons daily and have MCES reflect such change in billing. All major repairs or replacements to the Maplewood Lift Station 6 shall be performed by Maplewood and the costs incurred therefore shall be shared between the parties hereto with Oakdale paying a proportionate share based on comparison of average daily flows. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement on this day of , 2003. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Approved as to form by Legal Counsel - Approved as to form by Legal Counsel By City Manager And Mayor CITY OF OAKDALE By Mayor And City Administrator And Director of Public Works And Director of Finance AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Bill Priefer, Public Works Administrative Assistant Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer SUBJECT: Dial Tone Agreement Renewal DATE: March 3, 2003 Introduction Action by Council Date .�.. Endorsed Modified ' Rejected The dial tone agreement with our current vendor, McLeod USA, is due for renewal. Written quotations were requested and were received. from McLeod USA and Eschelon Telecom, Inc. Background McLeod USA submitted a quote of $4,091.10 per month or $49,093.20 for a one -year period. Eschelon Telecom, Inc. submitted a quote of $4,651.26 per month or $55,81 for a one -year period. Eschelon Telecom's quote also included one -time installation charges of $2,360. McLeod USA's quote did not include nor require installation charges as their equipment was installed when we signed the original agreement in January 2000. The quoted monthly cost is what we are currently paying. However, this cost will decrease to approximately $3,599 per month when caller identification equipment is installed with the new phone system. Qwest, the dominant dial tone supplier in this market, declined to submit a quote as the have a difficult y d cult time competing against co- locaters like McLeod USA and Eschelon Telecom, Inc. Additionally, many of the other co- locaters in the market today are experiencing financial difficulties which puts them in a less than competitive position. Recommendation It is recommended that the. City Council approve the renewal of McLeod USA's dial tone service agreement. for $4,091.10 per month for a period of one year. WJP jw AGENDA REPORT. AGENDA ITEM Action by Council Date TO: Richard Fur sman, City Manager Modifie FROM: Charles Ahl Public Works Director/City ejected y Engineer Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: English Street Landscape Improvements, City Project 01 -14 - Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids DATE: March 24, 2003 Introduction Final plans and specifications for the landscaping of the English /Frost Roundabout have been completed by the city's consultant, SEH, and are ready to be advertised for bids. The proposed bid opening for this project is scheduled for 10:10 a.m., Friday, May 2, 2003. Award of bids would be considered by the city council at the May 12, 2003, city council meeting. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for the English /Frost Roundabout Landscape Improvements, Project 01 -14: Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids. CIVIC j W Attachments 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on February 24, 2003, plans and specifications for the English Street Landscape Improvements, Project 01 -14, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and .. p specifications to the council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:10 a.m. on the 2nd day of May, 2003, at city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the. time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular city council meetin g of May 12, 2003. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Date FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer..,.,_ Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer ci Improvements, City Project 02 -b c es SUBJECT: Markham Pond Outlet and Utility p y j o -.. Acceptance of Project DATE: March 24, 2003 Introduction /Summary 'The Markham Pond storm outlet and utility improvements project is complete and ready for final payment. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution for acceptance of the project. Budget Impact The project cost is within the established budget. The following chart indicates the impact from the original estimate. Improvement Estimate Actual Assessment to Developer $40,403.20 $44,352.00 Cash Paid by Developer $14,057.00 $14,057.00 City Share - Bonds G.O. $26,105.20 $20,791.00 - Sewer Utility 6,000.00 $ 6 Total. $86,565.40 $85,200.00 Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for the Markham Pond Outlet and Utility Improvements, City Project 02 -02 for Acceptance of Project. CIVIC jW Attachments: Resolution Final Pay Estimate RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City p of Maplewood has determined that the Improvements of the Markham Pond Outlet and Utilities, City Project 02 -02, are complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 02 -02 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of an retaina a or escrow is hereby Y g Y authorized. APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 3 (FINAL) Proj. No. A- MAPLE0210.00 Location: Maplewood, Minnesota C.P. No. 02 -02 EACH Contractor: Ro -So Contracting, Inc. C ontr Date: September 19, 2002 $6,000.00 7137 20th Avenue North 202 202.00 Centerville, MN 55038 $28,280.00 LF 154 C ontr Amt: $62,590.00 Contract for: Markham Pond Outlet and Utilities EACH Application Date: January 21, 2003 $4,500.00 Period LF 392 Ending: January 15, 2003 $8,900.00 Sy 18 Qty to UiRt _ Item No. Item Unit Qty Date Price Total 50 220.00 $6.00 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% MAX.) 2501.515 54" RCP APRON W /TRASH GUARD 2503.541 54" RCP SEW, CL. 4, DES. 3006 2503.603 8" PVC PIPE SEWER, SDR 35 2504.602 WET TAP HOLE EXCAVATION 2504.603 8" DIP WATER MAIN, CL. 53 2504.604 2" RIGID INSULATION 2504.608 DIP WATER MAIN FITTINGS 2506.602 CONST °OUTSIDE DROP ON EX. SAN. MH PER PLATE 422 2506.602 8" SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT 251.1.501 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS IV (INCL. GEOTEXTILE FILTER) TOTAL BASE CONTRACT LS 1 1.00 $2 5 ,350.00 $2 9 350.00 EACH 2 2.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 LF 202 202.00 $140.00 $28,280.00 LF 154 154.00 $20.00 $3 7 080.00 EACH 1 0.00 $4,500.00 $0.00 LF 392 356.00 $25.00 $8,900.00 Sy 18 3.50 $10.00 $35.00 LBS 50 220.00 $6.00 $1,320.00 EACH 1 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 EACH 1 1.00 $400.00 $400.00 CY 27 33.00 $100.00 $3,300.00 $ $58 9 665.00 FD111 nHJ ROCK (TRENCH STABILIZATION) TN 40 40.00 $25.00 $1,000.00 CUT EX. 12" VCP LINE & BULKHEAD BOTH ENDS LS . 1 1.00 $50.00 $50.00 BOND LS 1 1.00 $1 $1,250.00 INSTALL WATERMAIN UNDER 54" RCP LS 1 - 1.00 $500.00 $500.00 TOTAL EXTRAS $2,800.00 GRAND TOTAL $61 Page 1 of 2 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO.3 (FINAL) - Continued Total Contract Amount $62,590.00 Total Amount Earned $61,465.00 St. Paul Water Department Fees $743.00 (Invoice attached) $743.00 Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete Contract Change Order No. Percent Complete GROSS AMOUNT DUE $62 LESS 0% RETAINAGE $0.00 AMOUNT DUE TO DATE $62 LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS $58 AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION $3 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under enalt "of perjury that. all P Y P .1 y 1 {) previous progress payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the Contract referred to above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all g g obligations of the undersigned incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said contract Markham kham Pond Outlet & Utilities, Maplewood, Minnesota, and (2) all material and equipment incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed din or covered by this Application for Payment and free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and emcumbrances. Date £ `' Ro -So Contracting, Inc. �r s _ (Contractor) COUNTY OF B m � } << ) SS STATE OF � � '' _ '� ') t� }-� �D A M RU Z:L I -(Name and Title) Before me on this day of 20 f ,� " �, `.Ld,. ;. , e" snally appeared known to be, who being duly sworn dial depose and that he /she is th ��r' -` > r i j . i P Vy e �.. _ (officer) of the CA for above mentioned My commission expires: r�cj _ o...._ , C �' t�,,,, A . GEL P USLICAMIN "SOTA (Notary blic) P y COMM, Expires Jan. 31, 2007 The undersigned has checked the Contractor's Application for Payment shown above. A art y p of this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him under this contract have been applied b him to discharge in full all of P y g b h In accordance with the Contract, the undersigned recommends a roval of payment pp p ym nt to the Contractor for the amount due. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICK _ ON, INC. By , Date ` IAW w K 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM �q AGENDA REPORT Action by council TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Dat FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director /City Engineer .`j; Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer Y g Rejects SUBJECT: Hazelwood Street Improvements (Phase I - County Rd C to Beam), Project 01 -16 Resolution Accepting Report and Calling for Public Hearing DATE: March 24, 2003 Introduction The feasibility study for the Hazelwood Street Improvements is complete and is available for review in the office of the city engineer. Final copies of the study will be made available to the city council prior to the public hearing. The study includes information on the proposed improvements, proposed financing and probable assessments. The city council will consider accepting the feasibility study and ordering a public hearing for Phase One of the project only. Background The proposed project area is illustrated on the attached project location map. The study has been broken down into two phases: Phase One is the segment from County Road C to Beam Avenue and Phase Two is the segment from Beam Avenue to a point just to the south of the proposed County Road D realignment. Hazelwood Street has been identified on the city's capital improvement plan for many years. A neighborhood meeting was held in February to discuss the project with the residents along the Phase One segment. A second neighborhood meeting is proposed to be held the week prior to the public hearing to give residents the opportunity to discuss the completed feasibility study and its findings. Only Phase One of the project is being proposed at this time. Informational meetings and a public hearing for Phase Two would take place later this season or early next year. Staff is, however, meeting separately with the Cardinal Pointe residents and St. John's Hospital to discuss the many projects in the area (Hazelwood, County Road D realignment, and Kennard Street extension). Budget Impact Phase One (County Road D to Beam Avenue) has been estimated at $1,282,000. Phase Two (Beam Avenue to County Road D) has been estimated at $1,069,000. Project financing for both phases is from three primary sources: assessments, State Aid and Sewer Utility Fund. Project costs and funding are outlined in detail in the feasibility study. Following council approval after the public hearing, only a Phase One budget would be established. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting the report and calling for a public hearing for 7:30 pm, Monday, April 14, 2003, for the Hazelwood Street Improvements project. CMC jW Attachment: Resolution Location Map RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 10, 2002, a report has been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Hazelwood Street (Phase I - from County Road C to Beam Avenue), City Project 01 -16, and this report was received by the council on March 31, 2003, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost for Phase One of the improvement of $1,282,000. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 14th day of April 2003 in the council chambers of city hall at 7:30 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. AGENDA REPORT Date TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager &,,,.,, , mod FROM: Bill Priefer, Public Works Administrative Assistant { Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Rejected SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Advance Resolution for Advance, of State Aid Funds DATE: March 24, 2003 Planned construction costs on our Municipal State Aid System during 2003 will exceed the current funding available. In order to address this shortfall in 2003, we are able to apply for and receive an advance on future funds. Background Each year a certain amount of money at the state level is available to cities in our situation for advance encumbrances. An advance encumbrance is essentially an interest -free loan to the city to be repaid with future allotments. This is a good program for cities like ours that have aggressive construction programs as it allows the utilization of funds that other cities are not using. The advance funding guidelines prior to 2003 limited municipalities to the previous year's allotment only. However, the guidelines were revised in 2003 and now allow us to request up to $1,000,000 in advance funding rather than Last year's allotment amount of $897,602. Another change effective in 2003 allows cities up to three years to pay back the advance rather than with the next allotment. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution requesting an advance encumbrance of $1,000,000 to our Municipal State Aid account. jw Attachment RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is planning on implementing Municipal State Aid Street projects in 2003 which will require state aid funds in excess.of those available in its State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, said city is prepared to proceed with the construction of said project through the use of advance encumbrances from the General State Aid Construction Account to supplement the available funds in their State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.13, Subdivision 6, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street.projects of the City of Maplewood in an amount of up to $1,000,000 in accordance with the Minnesota Rules 8820.1500, Subparagraph 9, and to authorize repayments from the following year's accruals to the construction account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said city. Agenda g # mir Vy count -ii t. REPORT SUMMARY Date. Endorlsed Iod�fled Re Applicant: John Schmelz Countryside Motors Site Address: 1180 Highway 36 East Zoning: Light Manufacturing Land Use: Light Manufacturing Ci t CounciN Hearin g Date: March 31, 2 60-Day Deadline: March 31, 2003 hn Schmelz of Project Description: Jo Countryside Motors is proposing to remo del g del and expand the existing Saab sales building located within his Countryside automotive dealership at .1180 Highway 36 East. The addition will be. 8,610 square feet in area and will house an expanded automobile service area. In addition to the building expansion, Mr. Schmelz has purchased nin land located behind the Ember's Restaurant. Mr. Schmelz proposes to ad�oi g exp and his automobile sales /storage lot into this vacant land. Request: In order to construct the addition and expand the sales /storage lot as p rop osed, Mr. Schmelz requires a conditional use permit for the expansion of a g nonconformin use (expanding a pre - existing - automobile repair and sales'/storage lot located -closer than the required 350 feet to residential property) and a arkin lot setback variance (parking lot located , closer than 15 feet to the p g right-of-way). Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit Recommendations. Sta pp a nd denial of the variance. an March 3, 2003, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit and denial of the variance. On March 11 2003, the community design review board recommended approval of the design review. I , /' /f Agenda g # mir Vy count -ii t. REPORT SUMMARY Date. Endorlsed Iod�fled Re Applicant: John Schmelz Countryside Motors Site Address: 1180 Highway 36 East Zoning: Light Manufacturing Land Use: Light Manufacturing Ci t CounciN Hearin g Date: March 31, 2 60-Day Deadline: March 31, 2003 hn Schmelz of Project Description: Jo Countryside Motors is proposing to remo del g del and expand the existing Saab sales building located within his Countryside automotive dealership at .1180 Highway 36 East. The addition will be. 8,610 square feet in area and will house an expanded automobile service area. In addition to the building expansion, Mr. Schmelz has purchased nin land located behind the Ember's Restaurant. Mr. Schmelz proposes to ad�oi g exp and his automobile sales /storage lot into this vacant land. Request: In order to construct the addition and expand the sales /storage lot as p rop osed, Mr. Schmelz requires a conditional use permit for the expansion of a g nonconformin use (expanding a pre - existing - automobile repair and sales'/storage lot located -closer than the required 350 feet to residential property) and a arkin lot setback variance (parking lot located , closer than 15 feet to the p g right-of-way). Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit Recommendations. Sta pp a nd denial of the variance. an March 3, 2003, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit and denial of the variance. On March 11 2003, the community design review board recommended approval of the design review. MEMORANDUM TO:: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Shann Finwall, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Countryside Motors -- Conditional Use Permit and Variance LOCATION: 1180 Highway 36 East DATE: March 24, 2003 INTRODUCTION Project Description John Schmelz is ra osin to remodel and expand the existing Saab sales /showroom building p p g located within his Countryside Motors automobile dealership at 1180 Highway 36 East. The addition will be 8,610-square in area and will have an automobile repair and service facility. In addition,. Mr. Schmelz proposes to expand: his automobile sales /storage lot into a vacant lot next- to the Ember's Restaurant. Requests Mr. Schmelz is requesting that the city council approve: 1. A ten -foot setback variance from a right-of-way for the new sales/storage lot. The expanded sales/storage lot is proposed to be five feet from a frontage road right -of -way. City code requires all parking areas to be located at least 15 feet from any right -of way. 2. A conditional use ermit (CUP) revision for the expansion of a nonconforming automobile p repair facility and automobile sales /storage lot (both located closer than the required 350 feet to residential property). 3. Design review. BACKGROUND Minor Subdivision On December 23, 2002, the city staff approved a minor subdivision to allow the back and east portions of Ember's lot (1200 Viking Drive) to be subdivided from the northwest portion (location of Ember's Restaurant and parking lot). John Schmelz purchased the new lot from the Ember's owners in. order to expand his sales /storage lot. A land - survey reflected that the vacated Cope Avenue right -of -way, located on the south side of the property, was not part of the new lot. City and county records, however, reflect that it was vacated by the city years ago. Mr. Schmelz's attorney is currently fling a quite title action to clear the title and ensure the right -of -way is legally part of the lot. The site plan included t proposal ro wi h this includes the vacated right -of -way. Wherefore, a condition of approval should be that the resulting order from the court reflects that Mr. Schmelz is the fee owner of the vacated right -of -way. PAST ACTIONS January 9, 1996 : The ci ty g ranted -ranted a CUP for the expansion of Countryside Motor's automobile dealership facility. February 12, 1996: y The city council reviewed this CUP and scheduled review again in one year. • council reviewed this CUP November 23, 1998. The city co and decided to' review it again if a problem developed or if the applicant proposed any changes. October 23 2000: The city council revised the CUP to allow the expansion of the facility including a front setback variance for an addition to the Volkswagen showroom. October 22, 200 1: The cit council reviewed the CUP and scheduled review again in one year. After this meeting, Mr. Schmelz questioned the wording of a condition, that stated, "The property owner shall install and maintain screening along all south lot lines to meet the city code. The community de si g n n review board (CDRB) must review the screening plan." Mr. Schmelz had understood that it had been determined that additional screening was not needed. November 13, 2001. Th • _ cit council determined that. additional screening was, in fact, not The ty needed to the south due to buffering by existing trees and grade differences. They amended Condition 4 of. the CUP to clarify that additional screening was not needed to the south. October 14, 2002: The city council reviewed the CUP and scheduled review again in one year. - DISCUSSION Conditional. Use Permit The property is zoned Light Manufacturing (M -1). Within this zoning district automobile sales is a permitted use and automobile repair requires a CUP. The code further states that both of these types of uses must be located at least 350 feet from residential properly. Countryside Motors was constructed before these requirements and is closer than 350 feet from residential property along the south property line. Since 1995, the city council has approved several CUPs for the expansions to both the automobile sales and automobile repair nonconforming uses. Th e g g existi automobile sales /story a lot is located 20 feet and the existing automobile repair facility is located approximately 70 feet from the adjoining residential property line. The new proposal includes expanding the sales /storage lot into Mr. Schmelz's new property located to the p ro p p � in a $0-foot setback south and east of Ember's Restaurant. The new sales /storage lot will maintain from the residential p roperty to the south, a 10 -foot setback from the residential property to the east, and a 5 -foot setback from the commercial property to the east. As stated above, the existing g sales /story a lot comes within 20 feet of residential property. This is also the city's minimum required screening and buffer distance for a commercial property March 24, 2003 ry Count side Motors 2 adjJ acent residential property. The .city council may approve the new sales /storage lot with a 10- foot setback to the eastern residential propery as part of the CUP. However,. staff feels that it is important to maintain the 20 -foot buffer from the residential property and recommends that the applicant revise the site plan to increase the sales /storage lot setback along the residential P ro p e rty to the east from 10 feet to 20 feet. Mr. Schmelz has indicated that he is willing to revise the sales /storage lot setback in this area. In addition to the expansion of the nonconforming sales /storage lot, Mr. Schmelz is proposing to construct an addition to the Saab sales building including an automobile repair facility that will come closer than the required 350 feet to residential property. The new repair facility, .if approved, would be approximately 1 feet from residential property. Both the sales /storage lot and the repair /service facility require CUPs, as they would both be an expansion of a nonconforming use. Refer to the applicant's CUP statement attached on pages 16 through 18. Variance The expanded sales/storage lot is proposed with a 5 -foot. setback to the frontage road right -of- . Y City . p ro p way Ci code requires. a 15 -foot setback. The applicant's CUP statement referenced above also states that because his existing parking lot is located 5 feet to the frontage road, the expansion of his new sales /storage lot with a 5 -foot setback to the frontage road as well should be considered as part of the expansion of the nonconforming use. Staff points out that the ro osed sales/storage a lot will be separated from the existing dealership by the Ember's p ry p g Restaurant. It is not a continuation of the dealership's existing parking lot se tback and therefore as proposed, requires a setback variance. The applicant states, in the attached variance statement on page 19, that due to the angle of the front lot line the p arkin lot is proposed with a 15 -foot setback to the right -of -way on the west and parking a 5 -foot setback on the east. This will allow for the construction of a straight fence and gate and - will accommodate parking for two additional automobiles. Staff find pp p s the applicant's estimate of hardship lacking, and recommends denial of the variance. . Increasing he setback of the sales /storage lot to. the required 15 feet will also be consistent with • g � (Ember's), dsca in to i the adjacent property's parking lot and will allow room for lan p g rove the p curb appeal of the sales /storage lot from the frontage road. utilities There is a watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer located on the back portions of.the in lot and the new sales /story a lot. These utilities are, not easily accessible in the event of existing 9 emergency maintenance because of existing fencing and parking of automobiles over the utilities. Mr. Schmelz has agreed to enter into a formal easement agreement with the St. Paul Regional Water Services and the City of Maplewood that will ensure access to all public utility easements. Countryside Motors 3 March 24, 2003 i • • concerns,. St. Paul Regional Water Services also expressed concerns In addition to access conce g regarding the grading radin on the new sales /storage lot. Mr. Schmelz has agreed to ensure no • f he watermain and will also work with the St. Paul Regional Water .grading within ten feet o t Services to- locate Ember's existing water services to ensure any grading above these services does not pose a problem. Site. improvements Saab Building, Addition The applicant is proposing an 3,610 -square -foot addition for the south side of the Saab • addition ill have a new automobile repair /service facility for the showroom/sales building. The addition w • . 'n buildin The dealership is currently servicing these automobiles in an existing g Saab dealership. p located behind the Volkswagen and Saab buildings. If the city app roves the addition, the air facility as overflow repair and service for types of vehicles. dealership will use the existing re p remove 39 parking stalls. The parking stalls will. be replaced The construction of the addition will p g u to 200 he new sales /story a lot next to Ember's, which will accommodate p by the addition oft g automobiles. he existing Saab showroom /sales building will be remodeled to - The front and side exteriors oft g material an inure copings with a sea shell colored EIFS (stucco -like ), Include pre - finished alum canopy, a new ent ry blue co m p osite metal panel, a new pre - finished aluminum wing c py, exterior p vestibule, and aluminum storefront windows. The addition will be constructed of pre -cast concrete p anels with integral color to match the new EIFS. Expanded Automobile Sales /Stora e Lot • sales/storage a lot will be used for the sale and storage of 5ales��torage Lot. The new sales /sto g � concrete curb . applicant's on proposal included a bituminous surface with ith co • automobiles. The pp 9 p utter and a larg stormwater pond. During the March 3, 2003, planning commission and g g • indicated that he is now proposing an innovative, environmentally - meeting, the applicant i designed to reduce beneficial pavement surface called Uni Eco- Stone. This system is des g be p f the parking lot, and it alleviates the stormwater runoff through .infiltration within the surface o p 9 ter pond. The applicant states that the Ramsey/Washington Metro need for the ,large stormwa p pP Watershed District is offering a grant to help fund. such a system. Chris Cavett • , assistant city g ' it e reviewed the. original pavement proposal (attached on opportunity to review the new Uni Eco -Stone proposal' The city ano page 32) but has not had pp tY department melz's CUP re uest on the condition that the city s engineering can approve Mr, Sch q for the new approves the new Uni Eco -Stone system and that all approved setbacks o sales /storage lot are maintained with the new system . tails within the new sales /storage lot, but has The applicant does not propose to stripe parking s • accommodate u to 200 automobiles. City code does not require that an estimated that it will a p employee stomer or automobile sales /story a lot have striped parking stalls, unless there is c p Y ' has indicated there will be no .customer or employee parking in the new parking. The applicant Countryside Motors 4 March 24, 2003 ' kin stalls is not required. However, Butch Cervais, fire lot, and therefore the striping of parking required within the indicated that a 20 -foot access road for emergency vehicles is q marshal, has � lot. For this reason staff recommends that the applicant submit a striping plan that. shows a , drive aisle within the new sales /storage lot of at least 20 feet in width. • � ere the applicant is proposing the new sales /storage lot - Reta Walls. The vacant lot Where pp his reason the . the frontage road to the. south side of the property. For t , slop es upward from g � heast corner of the new lot. This is proposing to install a retaining wail along the sout . applicant p p 9 • and extend upward to 8 feet, 8 inches at its highest point retaining wall will start at ground grade a p on the southeast corner of the lot. • extend the existing 6- foot -high chain -link fence, with three Fence. The applicant is proposing to g atchin ate the to g g strands of barbed wire along p, around the entire new sales /storage lot.. A m is prop osed in front of the new driveway to the frontage road. ndin Ember's oversized parking lot an Staff finds the prospect of a new parking lot surrounding -high chain-l barbed wire The addition of a 6-foot fence with b unattractive. proposal in itself. make the new sales /storage in the new sales /storage lot is unacceptable. In order to ma , surroundin the frontage he new fence and gate along th lot more attractive, staff originally recommended that • with decorative brick �r stone columns and that the road be constructed of wrought iron -ink fence u to 8 feet ' ions be constructed of a black vinyl- coated chain -link p remaining fence port high. - � rd (CDRS) \ 003 the Community Design Review Boa reviewed the design On March 11, 2 , reed that the fence as proposed was unacceptable. el6 ments of Mr. Schmelz s proposal and agreed t. the fence �n lot be nded however, tha front of the sales /storage The CDRB recomme , • Crete columns, rather than stone or brick,_ and the interior constructed of decorative pre -cast con • n. This constructed of chain -link fencing, rather than wrought pro • of the fence be c - .. The • com with the Volkswagen and Saab buildings. recommendation was to ensure p � building be the existing chain -link fence in front of the Saab b 9 CDRB also recommended that g consistent look between removed and replaced with the new style of fence in order to create a the new sales /storage lot and the existing lot. • Architects) have been working with • meeting, Mr. Schmelz s architects (RSP A c ) Since the CDRB 9� lot and the Saab building: staff on a revis ed fence design for the front of the sales/st . • - o be a roved by staff prior to issuance of a building Preliminary plans show the new fence, t pp galvanized chain -link permit, ,to be constructs • d of decorative pre -cast concrete columns with • Schmelz also requests that the remaining fencing, up to 4 feet in height. Mr. fence sections located around the s ides and rear of the new sales /storage lot be constru cted of g alvanized • o ppose to the recommended black vinyl- coated chain -link fencing to match the new fence (as pp I ton as • • t in height. Staff has indicated support for this proposal, as g chain -Ink fence), up to 6 fee g and screening issues described below are resolved. the landscape a g requires that all "large" trees removed Prese rvation: The city's tree preservation ordinance requi 9 Tree Press Y u to 1 o trees per acre. A large tree is defined as a tree from a site be replaced one-for-one, p p cottonwood, and poplar. at a 4 -foot trunk height, excluding boxelder, cotto , p p with a diameter of 8 inches The applica p nt ro oses removing two "large" trees with the grading of the new automobile sales/storage lot. Therefore, the applicant must plant at least two replacement trees on the site. March 24, 2003 Countryside Motors ' do blues spruce and 22 lsanti dogwoods to ' :The landscape plan calls for six Colorado p Landscaping the retaining wall. Again, in an attempt to be planted on the south side of the property, above g for the new staff recommends additional landscaping create a more attractive sales /storage lot, of the new sales/storage • 1 trees and shrubs to be planted �n front - or sales /storage lot to include. ) trees such as arborvitae road; 2) a row of columnar trees (narrow • , lot, along the frontage � par lot and the new sales /storage lot, 3) to be planted between king linden Embers p ir n th ills spruce (for longevity); 4) increase � rado blues k h ruce with blac p . replacement of the Colo p better screening buffer, and 5) e on the south side of the lot to create a b 11 (both number of spruc the to of the entire retaining wa the row of spruce and isanti. dogwood along p extending _ p . . south and east, adjacent both residential properties) round irri • ' es that all landscaped areas have underground irrigation. Mr. Schmelz indicates 9 City code requires into the new sales /storage lot, and • very cost) and difficult to extend irrigation that it would be ry y currently have irrigation. The city can approve e back portion of his existing lot does -not y applicant agrees to that th p tion in special circumstances, if the app g landscaping with the required irr�ga p removal of the underground n landscaping . Staff finds the - hand water. and replace any that dies p. Ion as the applicant submits a written ' require ment acceptable in this circumstance as g . irrigation agreement to hand water all landscaping. - of Mr Sc d the screening r Schmelz's previous CUP request Sc reening : As stated previously, during the review for the g addition) the city council reviewe. Volkswagen bu ad ) rmined that additional screening (ilding in lot. The city council dete - south lot line of the existing parking an d grade differences. A rences. south due to buffering by existing trees g in was not needed to the will re- evaluate the need. for screening on ' ' was added t o the CUP that states ,the city condition owner roposes changes to the site east sides of the property �f the property p , ood the south and south - ditional screening since the Maplew entl however, there is no need for ad � the city ' plan. Pies y, - d that the applicant is meeting ty s Community Design Review Board has determine Co ty screening requirements." Marc 21 2003. Mr. Anderson's Duluth Street, contacted staff on Ma t during Gordon Anderson, 2255 par lot. Mr. Anderson stated tha g located directly to the south of the existing p g deciduous trees an house is s creening from the parking lot with the summer months there is adequate s g there . winter months, however, Ion his north property lme, During the side shrubs that are located along een trees be planted along the south screening Mr. Anderson requested that evergr is no 9 of Mr. Schmelz's existing parking lot. B meeting, no landscape screening • c staff after the March 11 CDR g since Mr. Anderson conta board. Staff agrees with .the neighbor, tin parking lot was recommended by the hs. Staff on the exis ting P g adequate screening during the winter mont however, and finds that there is not n the south side of the recommends that the applica add a row of Black Hills spruce a!o g ' tin parking lotto ensure an 80 percent opaque y ear-round screening of the parking lot from existing p g re quired b code. 1 the adjacent residential property as re q y • requires that all new freestanding lights be a Site Lig hting: The city s lighting ordnance requ illum ination from any outdoor light addition, um light maximum of 25 feet in height. In , the maxim • applicants l 's roposal incudes relocating candles at all property lines. The app p in light cannot exceed .4 foot installing one new 20- foot -high freestand g , tin 30- foot -high freestanding lights, insta g four. existing and installing four new wall -pack lights: March 24, 2003 Co side Motors 6 Z . freestanding lights finance allows for the. relocation of the taller fr g hts as part of design 9 The [�ghfiing ord sal. Staff feels that the relocation of the view, based on. appropriateness for a specific propo is a p p ropriate) ' re he expanded and existing sales /storage lot 30- foot -high freestanding lights into t p t shows the light ' metrics Ian is submi#ted by the applicant that as long as a revised photo P by code. candles as required t all roe illumination a property �Y lines does not exceed .4 foot ca Other Comments . safe concerns regarding the . John Sanick, Deputy Police Chief, states that he has no public safet proposal at this time. ' accessible parking stalls and bathrooms are • Building Official, states that handicap acre p g Dave Fisher, 9 fully s nklered. q re uired and that the Saab building must be u y p n in fire rotectiQn items Butch Gervais, Fire will be required: fire Marshal, states that the following .p . protection system; • - including existing building; monitor fire profs y rotection system must be installed, g nc vehicles; horn /strobes p x• minimum of 20 -foot access road for emergency i department lock box; , e in the showroom /office area. in service garage area and any normally occupied spap Committee. Actions • a rova l of the two requested CUPS 3 the planning commission recommended pp i sion On March 3, 200 . p fer to the March 3, 2403, planning comm $ . denial of the parking lot setback variance. Re and p minutes attached. he design review for the Saab 003 the CDRB recommended approval oft g 3 On March 11, 2 lot. Refer to the March building 240 in addition and remodeling and the new sale s/storage . g CDRB minutes. attached. r R ECOMMENDATIONS setback variance from a public John Schmelz's request for 10 -foot parking lot . 1. Deny Jo s /stora a lot at his Countryside Motors right-of-way .for the expansion of the sale g request because: g Y 36 E. The city is denying this automobile dealership at 118Q Highway Y a. There is no h p ardshi associated with . the variance request. 5 -foot sales /storage lot setback will not be Consistent with the b' The proposed • 3 (Ember's). ad oinin roperty s parking lot adjoining k will leave no room for landscaping . The p d 5 -foot sales /storage fat setback . e C. ose p p between the lot and the frontage road. Landscaping is needed to improve t curb appeal of the sales /storage lot. olution approves a revision to the the resolution on pages 33 and 35. This res l�P h� 2. Adopt , - • elz s Countryside Motors automobile dealershi conditional use permit for John Schm ry the • East. The revision is for the expansion of located at 1180 Highway 36 � ed closer than the bile repair and automobile sales (both located . nonconforming automo p is based on the findings required by A ro required 350 feet to residential property) va Pp March 24, 2003 7 ry Count side Motors the code and subject to the following conditions (additions are underlined; deletions are crossed out): a: All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. • building must be started ion of the proposed addition to the Saab b . g .. . b. The construct p a royal for this addition shall end. 'thin one y ear of city council approval or the pp w ithin Y The city council may extend this deadline for one year eAp the el Pill ves elan Wf Re Flee r • • • i • . • - t emergency vehicles, to o c.e: r from There shall be no automobile access, except r Duluth Street. • ri ht -of is rohibited or unloading of automobiles on the ublic d. The loading - . e. Automobiles shall onl be arked on des ' Hated aved or en ineered orous surfaces . t a reement with St. Paul Re ional The a Brant will enter into a formal ease ncies' - e Ci of Ma lewood which satisfies both a e Water :Services and the r water main (SPRWQ and conditions for access to the ublic utili easements fo sanitary and storm sewer Ci of Maplewood), The cit council shall review this permit in one year. 9• Y 003 for the proposed Saab building ve the plans date - stamped January 24, p lersh� at 3' Approve p expansion to Countryside Motors automobile dea p addition and sales /storage tot the following: • v i is su to the property owner doing 9 1180 Highway 36 East. Appro a ! . t issued a building permit for this Repeat this review in two years if the city. has no a. p project. • s are not art of this approval ' own on the site plan and building elevation p b. Signs shown and will require separate sign permits. March 24, 2003 Countryside Motors 8 C. Submit the following for staff approval before the city issues a grading or building permit: (1) Final . grading, paving surface, drainage, utility and erosion control plans. These plans shall mee #.the requirements of the city code and the city engineer. The grading plan must show no grading within 10 feet of the watermain. (2) Verification that John Schmelz is the fee owner of the 30-foot-wide portion Of the vacated Cope Avenue right -of -way that runs along the south portion Of the expanded sales /storage lot property: (3) A striping plan for the new automobile sales /storage tot which shows a drive aisle running from the frontage road to the entrance of the existing lot that is at least 20 feet in width'. (4) A revised site plan showing the following: (a) The new sales /storage lot is setback 20 feet from the eastern residential property line. (b) The new sales /storage lot is set back 15 feet from the frontage road right -of -way. (c). The proposed fence along the south property line of the new sales /storage lot is set back at least 10 feet from the waterma in.. (d) The existing chain -link fence in front of the Saab building be removed and replaced with a fence compatible with the required north sales /storage lot fence described below. (5) Elevations of the proposed _fence and gate. The north fence; along the frontage road, shall include decorative pre -cast concrete columns. (6) Revised roof plan showing that all rooftop equipment and vents are located - as close to the highest parapet wall as possible. (7)- A revised landscape plan to include: (a) Trees and shrubs to be planted in front of the sates /storage lot, along the frontage road. (b) A row of columnar trees (narrow trees such as arborvitae or lindens) between Ember's parking. lot and the new sales /storage lot. Countryside Motors 9 March 24, 2003 (c). Replacing the Colorado blue spruce with Black Hills spruce, increasing the number of spruce along the south side of the new sales storage lot to increase screening, and continuing the row of Black Hills spruce and Isanti dogwood along the tap of the entire retaining watt (both south and east, adjacent both residential properties). (d) To ensure no parking on top of the utility easement, removal of any gravel within 20 feet of the existing eastern fence in the south parking lot and re- establishment of turf or shrubs. (e) A row of 6- foot -high Black Hills spruce spaced 15 feet on center to be planted on the south side of the existing parking lot, adjacent 2255 Duluth Street. (fl The requirement for an underground irrigation system is waived for the new sales/storage lot if Ahe applicant submits an agreement to the city that ensures that the landscaping will be hand - watered and replaced if it dies. (8) A revised outdoor lighting and photometric plan. The revised plan shall show the height and style of all outdoor tights (including relocated lights), and that the light illumination from all outdoor lights does not exceed .4 foot candles at all property lines. (9) A cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. d. Complete the following before occupying the sales /storage lot; (1) Install all approved parking lot surface (i.e.,. bituminous and curb and gutter, or engineered porous surface ). (2) Stripe all drive aisles: (3) Install the. approved fence. (4) Install all required landscaping by June 1 if the sales /storage lot is finished in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of completion of the sales /storage lot if it is finished in the spring or summer. (5) Install all required exterior lights. (6) Enter into a formal easement agreement with S #. Paul Regional Water Services and the City of Maplewood which satisfies both agencies' conditions for access to the public utility easements for watermain (SPRWS.)'and. sanitary and storm sewer (City of Maplewood): Countryside Motors . 10 March 24, 2003 the eastern fence in • ins at the 20 -foot setback along . , . ( 7) Install no- parking signs here is no parking over the utili the existing south lot to ensure that t easement. in the Saab building: m lete the following before occupy 9 e. Co p • exterior improvements. Install all required e �) nt .. Screen all roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent (2) residential property - in dune sters are enclosed a tra sh enclosure, subject to 3 Ensure all trash p e trash storage. ( )_ there staff approval, if would be ou t allow te mporar y m occupancy if i : t done, the city may ry . If any . required work s nQ • essential to the public health, �1) The city determines is that the work not es safety or welfare.. escrow is held by the City of uired letter of credit or cash or . (2) The above -required exterior improvement The owner for all required ext p imp rovements by June 1 Maplewood an nished exterior contractor shall complete y unfi • wi or wi n si weeks of x i of the building is in the fall or summer. f occupancy • if occupancy is in the spring or sum occupancy of the building p r community development approved fans. The director of 9• All work shall follow the apps p may. approve minor changes• 11 March 24, 2003 Countryside Motors CITIZEN COMMENTS Motors. Of the four within 350 feet of Countryside - 1 survey he owners of the 22 properties nd one had minor concerns. y in favor of the proposal, a responses received, thre e were In Favor rd Inc., 777 Menard Drive, Eau ice President/Real Estate, Mena ., ;de is a rest - Mary 80 Ma lewood Drive). "Countryside g Wisconsin (Menard's Store at 22 p Claire, a g reat for the neighborhood. They run an upscale business and they ar g 11 designed and neighbor. They heir proposal. It appears to be we g . Id b ion oft p p should � given every.considerat will be an asset to our community." • Welding Company, 2303 Atlantic Stree . Wilma Miller, Handy Hitch and VV . 9 , forward to them 2 Richard and • . o Count side s plans•. V11e look fo r Maplewood "We have no -objections t rY Map n - maintaining the empty lot. • Drive, Excelsior Minnesota (owners • ' and Ma Costas, 45 Clay Cliffe Dri , .3. Hossein Aghai�nirzai !�! : "It is okay by me." t 1145 Viking Drive, Maple wood ) of University Auto a Concerns ' Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 36 Embers, 1664 University and that 1. Brad Birnberg, Highway .. "Our oi11 concern is water drainage ' Restaurant at 120a Viking Drive) • Y „ (Embers integrity of our parking tot. may underrn�ne the g ty the drainage . - 12 March 24, 2003 Countrys ide Motors RE1= ERENC E INFORM ATION SITE DESCRIPTION Existing Dealershi Site Size: 4.4.5 acres Site side Motors Automobile Dealership Existing Land Use: Country Pr Sales /Stora a Lo Site Site Size: 1.5 acres St Existing Land Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES Road and Highway 36 - North: Fr ontage R Str Lark Avenue and Atlantic Street . Houses and Apartments on Duluth Str , South. West: Menard's East. Ember's Restaurant PAST ACTIONS of Countryside Motor's The city council granted a CUP for the expansion _ January 9, '1995. tY automobile dealer facility. • scheduled review again in one year. • cit council reviewed this CUP and s February 12, 1996. The y council reviewed this CUP and dec �ded to review it again if a November 23, 1998: The city problem developed or if the applicant proposed any changes. c • ex ansion of the facility council revised, the CUP to allow the p October 23, 2400; The city . • • he Volkswagen showroom. • iance for an addition to t including a fro nt setback var , _ d scheduled review again ins one y ear. •The city council reviewed the CUP an October 22, 2001. Y condition, that stated, "The property • chmelz uestioned the wording of a c •The After this meeting, Mr. S q i outh lot lines to meet the city code 11 and maintain screening along all s owner shall insta screenin plan." Mr. Schmelz had view aboard (CDRB) must review the g community design re additional screening was. not needed understood that it had been determined that ad ± screening was, in fact, not • he city council determined that additional nded November 13, 2001. T tY d grad differences. They amended existi trees an g the south. needed to the south due to buffering by g nee to • • lari that additional screening was not Condition 4 of the CUP to c fy • scheduled review again in one year. • ci council reviewed the CUP and October 14, 2002. The ty counc nt 13 Cou ntryside Motors March 24, 2003 PLANNING Land Use Plan: M -1 (Light Manufacturing) Zoning: M -1 (Light Manufacturing) Criteria for Conditional Use Permit Approval � . Section 36 -17(h) states that a property owner may expand a nonconforming structure or .parking lot if the structure or parking lot meets the following conditions: a. The zoning regulations permit the use • required b this chapter or the expansion would meet the . m setbacks req Y b. The expa ichever is less. Thee shall not setbacks of the existing structure, wh height required by this chapter or the existing , .exceed the maximum height q .the c ity may approve a • deviate from these requirement s , tY whichever is taller. To CUP, subject to the standards in the city code. • ter level in a shoreland district minimum setback from. the ordinary highs wa r 50 C. The setback of adjacent residential structures o would be at least the average setb J feet, whichever is greater. ld be on the applicant's property. d. All portions of said structure wo o • ' d not adversely affect an adjacent of the add e. Runoff from the overhang ition wool property • rove a CUP,, based on nine 2. Sect ion 36 -442 a) states that the city council may app Sects C and 3�. standard Refer to the resolution on pages 33 Criteria for Variance Approval t iy council make th e following findings -to approve a variance: State law requires that the c g Id cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the . Strict enforcement woo p rop e rty under consideration. • e sp irit and of the ordinance. 2. The variance would be in keeping .with th p . . f a variance, means the property in by th shi as used in connection with the granting o e official Undue hardship, •f used under conditions a uestion cannot be put to a reasonable use i to his prop erty, not created q downer is due to circumstances unique controls. The plight of the Ian r the essential character of the locality by the landowne r . and the variance, if granted, will not alte a for the , constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use Economic considerations alone shall not exists under the terms of the ordinance. proper Countr Motors 14 March 24, 2003 ry Application gate and plans for this request on January 24, 2003. The city received the complete applications p in 60 day s of receiving comp applications . for .a State law requires that the city take action with y land use proposal. City action was required on this proposal by March 25, 2003. However,. council meeting was rescheduled to March 31 to ensure a quorum, because the March 24 city coup g March 31, 2003. - a d in writing to extend his 60'day deadline to the applicant ha s agree p:sec9lcount yside Attachments: 1. Conditional Use Permit Statement 2. Variance Statement 3. Location Map .4. Zoning Map 5. Land Use Map 6. Site. Plan 7. Grading Plan 8. Tree Removal Plan - 9. Landscape Plan 10. Retaining Wall 11. Existing Elevations 12. Proposed Elevations 13. Floor Plan 14. (Outdoor Lighting Plan 15. Assistant City Engineer Comments 16. Conditional Use Permit [resolution March 24, 2003 Countryside Motors 15 Attachment 1 Supplement to Conditional Use Application for Countryside Volkswagen, Inc. 1180 East Highway 36 Maplewood, MN 55109 Telephone: (651) 484 -8441 Contact: John Schmelz Th following information has been prepared by RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street N.E. _ Minneapolis, MN 55413 Telephone: (612) 677 -7100 Contact: James warren SUMMARY Conditional uses from the City of Maplewood: The applicant specifically requests the following • of setback from residential Relief from City ordinances requiring a 350 f0 idential uses to motor of building A. R applicant* requests that the 75 fo 9 setback vehicle sales /service uses. The app maintained for this property. established in the 1994 Conditional Use Perini# be line to parking; • � ordinances requiring a 15 foot setback from front property B. Relief from City ordina ment, as established in the previous a re require ap plicant requests elimination of setback q o Permit ranted in Conditional 1994 Use 9 . CURRENT ZONING. CLASSIFICATION: M1 CURRENT USE: d service; the applicant does not propose The property ert is currently used for motor vehicle sales an off site to a local body repair Repair of body damage to cars has been move any change in use. p service facility. APPLICATION FOR.CONDITIONAL USE A ND SCOPE OF REQUEST REASONS FOR • dealership in 1966, prior to City ordinances 'cant founded the Countryside automotive dea P reside. ntial uses. In A. The applicant motor vehicle saleslservice setback from establishing the required 350 f re uested and was granted a 75 foot 1994, as part of a conditional use permit, the applicant q rvice addition is ential uses. The currently proposed Saab se The building setback from resid line adjacent to the-Menards storage - roximatel 78 feet from the southern property adjacent business practices and app y 205 feet from the nearest residential use. addition is approximately rand identification have led to the need for cur rent manufacturer requirements for distinct b ovements are necessary for d ansion of the existing Saab facility. These imp remodeling an ex p to remain competitive in their marketplace. the applicant e a 10 foot t corner of the applicants property include B. Existing site conditions near the no rthwes 15 feet due to widening of the ed boulevard. (on Cy Property), reduced from to wide landscaped it o is la s vehicles up their property line in The a licant historically and currently d p Y The app licant is service road PP ' Tonal use permit allowed this configuration. that location. The 1994 conditional P proposing osin no changes to this area of the property. 16 RESPONSES TO CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL • tin use will not be changed. All improvements will be 1. USE CONFORMITY. The existing ' designed, maintained, constructed and operated in, conform ance with the City s comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances (subject to the requests contained herein.) improvements will enhance the existing character of the 2. CHARACTER OF THE AREA. The imp atible with the g . surroundin area by remodeling the existing Saab Sales building -to be com p recent addition and aesthetic u rade of the Volkswagen sales and service building. Existing site lighting shall remain unchanged. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: Re: The Saab Service addition -- The applicant suggests that the adjacent properties w ill realize a positive effect from the upgrading of the applicants property. ip this area was not maintained and Area — Under previous ownership Re: New Car Storage P s. The applicant will install an lacked proper screening from adjacent residential use PP in of the innovative porous technique to allow water infiltration, provide screening P P property and properly maintain the area. 4. HAZARD AND N U I SAN C E FACTORS t the expanded facility will generate equal or less noise .NOISE: The applicant suggests that P than the existing facility. The service addition walls are 10 thick co ncrete p anels, which serve as an excellent. means of sound control. building will be constructed of somewhat rough non -glare - GLARE. The expanded Saab bu 9 elevation than adjacent materials. The new car storage area is significantly lower in ele J • d is screened with the use of a retaining wall and plantings, all residential neighborhoods, an contributing to a reduction in potential glare. ELUTION: All air work shall be done within SMOKE, DUST, ODOR, FUMES AND AIR PO repair services the confines of the service addition. Current environmental regulations and ' � environments that benefit both employees of the facility as well as the technologies create e iwhich it is located. Using easily replaceable vehicle components for repairs environment n w II a ved exhaust collection device are two examples of this practice. and an environmentally pp ro N: There will be no use of uncontained contaminants. In fact, the -WATER POLLUTION: tanks from the site.'. applicant has previously removed all underground DRAINAGE RUNOFF: Re. The Saab Service addition There is no planned increase in the w Car Storage Area All runoff from the existing. amount of hard surface area. Re: Ne impervious portions of the storage lot will be directed into the holding pond for absorption. providing this same level of treatment to the runoff from 3/4's of the The applicant is also p g That sub- watershed that flows onto t Embers parking lot. Tha he Schmelz property is pretreated for absor tion. g throu h native grasses and is then directed into the pond p VIBRATION: Other than normal truck traffic for delivery of product, there is no vibration causing activity. UNSIGHTLINESS: All trash is, and will continue to be, contained within enclosures. Hazardous waste is, and will continue to be, properly contained and stored for disposal according to local, state and federal regulations. no site activity, either existing or planned, which ELECTRICAL INTERFERENCE. There i s Y will cause electrical interference. 17 ose of the expansion is to better serve an . existing 5. :.VEHICULAR TRAFFIC: The primary purp p identity of sales base and to respond to manufacturers insistence on Y customer an d services. The anticipated increase in vehicular traffic is minimal. - of aware of an increase in demand for public 6. PUBLIC SERVICES. The applicant is n Y . services which will be caused by the proposed. expansion. SERVICES: As stated in #6, the 7. COST FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES ORS applicant is not aware osed of any increased demand for public services which will be caused by the prop expansion, thus, no cost is anticipated. 8. SITE FEATURES: New ill be desi ned to coordinate with the existing primary Si na a g lighting structures and with existing will grading, paving and natural features. g g and upgraded and coordinated into a cohesive whole which will result in building aesthetics will be upg . • landsca in around the -new car - storage area will be. included as an overall improved image, p g part of the site design. EFFECT The applicant is, and continues to be, 9. POSSIBLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EF pp r customers, proactive in his desire to create an environmentally sound and safe facility fo neighbors. Specific information on environmental concerns and actions is employees and neig p stated above. 18 QW1 I L py �71c���1 r�c�11JC1i1 lrVJ U�ClO'+UVVi rU1J''CJ'VQ G.'wwrivi� rttyv Attachment 2. F1 l _ ;. 25 February, 2003 Shane Firmall City of .Maplewood 1830 - County Road 8 East II apkMood, MN 55100.. Post -it" Fax Note 7571 t agea 1 sa From HL co. /Dept Co- Phone # phonic # . Fax The purpose of this letter is to exptaln why a earl -; -n i ;belrog requested for the front s+elback of this parking tot property, The client was informed that he' would have to request a, niw variance for the 50 foot section of his north property line: The pro .e'r -mss.- 440A_aAC ""_ � -lost will have 15 hoot parking setback and ,part will. have a 5 foot setback. if this is granted the parking lot setback snd the wa►fore the. par_kln -v�+ m- A ..b..in.- �►. ff alga aa� net: �acallet to the survey. Having this easement alla"a 4he applicant to have a" straight fence and gate and not need a special gate. It will also a ll 1 " 'par k tWo more tv M t#� area. Thar. applicant requi parking area for his business o peration and many sills by lost to the stormwater ponding and water quality requirerrrerrt� fie 1ty�art�d he watersh tt in ... ...... Moth oo m men t r egard the la�zon i hi r ng lot. The retaining w�rli i$ '1 g feet away from #hs east property line and the edge of bitum Inous is 29.5 feet .from the east p ro perty line. C wo,n't_le.any closet thsan the .VMfl,. all -#. .-I%Or . will be west and below the retaining wall'. The Wil be scmened a nd out of eight if one l cs westward from the. 0 y g. east. The wall .governs where -Car p -park -and r*Vthe -set k -ii­-- If you have any questions, pl ease call me' at GleAn - Rehbein Companies. Sincerely, /V 4. tic Willi m A.T. McCully E. Glenn Rehbeln Co hies F FP 2003 19 co dW Attachilment s '11�, N w E S Attac hment 4 Legend Light Manufacturing. Heavy Manufacturing M- Neighborhood Commercial Commercial office Limited Business Commercial Business Commercial Modified Business Commercial Shopping, Center. Small Lot Single Dwelling Residential [� g Sin le Dwelling Residential OEIN � Double Dwelling Residential. mom Low Mutitple Dwellings • Condo High Multi le Dwelling Residential Co g p Planned Urban Development - ig; Residential Estate (30,00 sq ft) Residential Estate (40,00) ft) Farm Zonin 2, _ � }tip .. •_ g Ma p x1-51 z L e g en d 'ar { Light Manufacturing ® Heavy Manufacturing. Neighborhood Commercial • Commercial Office Limited Business Commercial Business Commercial Modified ® Business Commercial Small Lot Single Dwelling Resi Single Dwelling Residential Double Dwelling Residential Low Multiple Dwelling Resident Medium Multiple Dwelling Resid High Multiple Dwelling Residen 30000 Residential Estate 40000 Residential Estate Park Open Space School N City Government Library Cemetery E Church Fire Station 22 k,�P• Lan d U e s a M l At tachment 5 Attachment 6 Vt" DRIVE E I!' -O' PARKMG 6ETCAM (R�ONfAGE IiOADI PMUM TO C -o" 14" A! WAY (MAK7FATNEAED W 1 •ow 16 6PACE6 • Y-6' X IA' ■/ 62 WACO 6 Y-6 X Si' 24' DRIVE AKE � 22'o" AKE (DISPLAY) (pI6PLAY) EXISTHS S 6PACE6 f IO X M' W 24' DRIVE AISLE (G716TO IM ' a 1 Dd6TMG VCLXbIIIfaw 6ALE61 deRVICE NULDM a 4 6PACE6 - 6 1 X I6' d R,OOR EL 8 22' D" I REDU MO WIK CN VS SLOG) 1 6'-O' P To i SE1luCK REDUCED To C -D' ' lGRAMFAT*D W • uk EXI6TNG 6AAS Dd6TM FAKE !SEE CMJ 6ALF6 all MG !LOOK EL 61636 k ol r' • I • CAR Y -VXIWW DRNE AISLE L _ — J !DISPLAY) I- RELOCATE &XM WALL I 1 61RJCiWE III► 6k3N j a SPACES is V-d X Id' W I um 6ERv_ICET 24' D1tlVE AI61.E • — _ADDITION - -�- - -- (SERVICE) — SCAlRlTYFENCE I 39 SPACES DIS!'l+4CED AOOR BY AMMON - - - - + = -- - G SPACES Y-6 X Si' DIJILDNG - - - - + - -- roe a/ 22' DRIVE AISL E (DISPLAY) FLOOR EL• 81" l6EE G1M.) I I_ (NO WOIKONTIN6 .� _ ._.._.._ 4 - .• —..— — •. --.•_ 1 SPACW • Y-V X Id' r/ I.1 2,v DOW WACa<e • W X W r/ 24' �--- l6ERViC1eJ DRIVE A az raeT MEM . _ .. . _. . _ .. _ .. RAMM COMM" ; 14� AIM 6'-V PARKMG & SAM . I (61M CNU ® RUM TO O'-O' COPE AYE (GRAa'vFATF6QED W 24' ORNE AISLE X I6' d 1 (EMM..OYEE' PARIGMG) ( I 1 4 V" AISi.E X li' �/ WrAWM WILL -- — (SEE CMJ �"� • -_ I r (EM MOM PARIGNG) .. 1 � 1 _ CAR 6TORAC+E I I WS 1 CYCLIMM 1 PENCE NORTH 0 30' 60' I _.._.._.._..J E Site I an ­23 Attachment 7 M , 1 ( I \ 4,404* SO. FT. r I \ da 7200 VIKING DRIVE E. m j l `ca m 1 \ J ONE STORY BUILDING 1 19.2' HIGH O CENTER F Ir 9.2' HIGH O EDGE CYCLONE FENCE � \•. // L4 • z 6. EMBERS -- -� j 1 1 \../ I• W ,. :/s +! /n /'I 4. 9 - ~ _ F� I 5' PARKI C 5�� 4 \.� / T�� �1 I j SETBACK' II `\ f' tJ:k3 C11: J. MOK-WALA i I 1 1 ' 086 ELE / It 2 1 1 I 1 `ice i r /.y_ I , 8 SPACES gig F 1I�'uM STUB TtiMii::'IJ:a' a I 1 r;rni' 1 1 14Lili- { \. I J r m 1 1 I – /'� A`WN G J I. m . ... I ` _l._.. \\ to rl \\ J 1 I I .j ':REE I I r` ` _SMEIER I,� \\ 1 \ i �Y I I 1 ` I 3 / 1 1 , 1 \ '•• � � 6 Si%ACES CC++SRFTE -•�'� 883.9 ny, ` ©1\.we r }I i Ji.1 KOS . \ 886- - FL 1 J I II�I� ♦/ / ,oCRETE L..__ ,K / , / F .ef 1 I ♦ / / / SLAB _ _ = � \ 1 i \ � � �..._ +— i • i \ ° � �� �' ♦ / ' 1 111 / / 1 '( � I � I � \'•. • I i \\ 1 n �A:l:s \\ I / –/ / � / ( / 1 1 11 // i j Eva Lk' erruwxais �' I � / / I I . Ps p� 1 1 – / / it / R i00 HWL asyir 3. 3 // / 1 / 1 I // /♦ IJ l to m WALL ELEv NwL 879.00 8 . 0 BH3.00 / i7• I �+ , SUM+ 877.00,/ ND 7 ' g / ♦ // / / / I - / / 1183,00 BODY SHOP TOOL h-4742ti , Z 1 CAS G S_ - RIM 8.95 / m r. i / / ' P .i J 'k BB GASM`TER / ( r i !/ �\ I s°a/�`FL l x 882.80 III-3. i ♦ �3.00 i EXISTING �' W 1 \ 91 F _ / / / ♦ N 1a I Es WITH zcr r8P/R p '� �NOUS - IMV WITH TWO cR SI L' j7fi - � _ _ � ' \ // // // / ,/ ♦ / ♦ 1 �/ / / // EX INV 879.68 I I I l( / / - - i _� ! ..L. -.. =, \E. If• • .•r. _I..........._. { - PUMP�� _ r V CL E R ,' TCN • / i /7 I w 1 / 1 "' .- i-�-ww 1 . �1 // M - 7 / 8' HIGH SECU ITY FtN / y -- H ANITARY SEWER ♦ I I / / / J / A /._. s 01Y�HZ4.1SZ � .- __ LL TCr LONE I1L��, / - TEt1'._..... rTU ON"' mNi / / C O E / C�raTERyrfE of/ VACATED ROW I �i av wARL I" 15' CON LVERX � � i � l p RI /.. 0.2 7 _ . = �� J . -c- . ♦/ F ♦ / / �D �♦ y/ / / / ! / ELEV. 99l O +CONC. CUL.....�..... I( 7 � N / / � / _ f ' - % / : / J i / � ♦ .Q l�� ��� / r'j Ate / N A rt X16TING AG �_- – �99p /: i / ,/ /: ♦ / i 9p2 t!p / - TOP= 8.61 i , ` / / ! I ' ♦ / i 1 1 00 I I 2d' ARKING .RIG4T�QFa NU4Y ��� _- s RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE AS C IN. AS. MONUMENTED B01'�. NO. 2 - E177 +�� + �� CONCRETE' ACCESS _ • 1 ` 6 • 4•x ? BITUMI 5 �� A/ t :R8 LUT, N EASEMENT PER. DOC. + NO. 2882897 1 I Grading Plan 24 ' Attachrllent 8 EASEME.IIT DER. Qoc. 7. 1 /7 f r IG NG. 208 434 {' -F� RK `NG i I I 4, SC. FT. I SET(IACK �'° .IGN S81 j .4; �f j oo Ul I 1 ( Lo 1200 VIKING DRIVE IGN �. O NE STORY BUILDING , ° _ 19.2 HUGH Q CENTER 5 PARE'CING,' f f I 9.2 I->1GH @ EDGE l SETBA�,K r , IN � �6.0 I / r a0 LU i f 5�.4� I '`° CL LL Q r , SIGN \ i t CURB CUT CONCRETE } 1 1 SIDEWALK a _ S � TBAC ? I j � K 1 ; Bg5 8 SPACES /SB2 f►` y LP / ; r f ' 1 I CAR STOP IM ( 8 SPACES I � I CAR STOP r � 00 I i 8 SPACES •���`.' r I n I 1. 1 .. TREE 8 SPACES J *W F • l � �_ � ' COiV'�RETE I i PAD �AN.MH I TB� i - DOD/ i I 8 S PAC -S, L _ LU f- I ,.., 11 \ 8 SPACES HE i Ij I NEW EDGE 6F BITUMINOUS / La akin. ,84 ' _� ,'� ' '� BASSWB�l r,' ,` ke WHI T'E I � 46 SBfi� -� S85r A S B l:J M I ICI t r r r 1 4 - 84 ETBACK - j I ,l % `' ('—�' • - _ __ _ _ — - i` 15' HARKcINC /` � L ```4 , SE,TBAO'K f '�' ��++ yy R i OF 0 0 IPE PD _ i .43 ' P [FL4 SAN. Aft . �t.k,iN.MH Attachment 9 Hw 36 - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - j "TA Or= WAX A11K. RIGHT-OF• WAY SIT. CURR AS CONTAINED IN ---.675 AS MONU MENTE NO. M79. -ff" f T- CURB * W77 jr _nVU. . .. ... . ........ Qu 10* WILE - - ----------- e AMC - S K, S CYCLONE FENCE r --EGOE OF 47CE----- I :� M !Y BITL E ASEMENT PER. NO. 2882897 Z, r %% l_ I % % I ot 14 CYCLONE FENCE % V 1 0 , 5 . It PARKIN --\ SETBACK oo , ------- BUILD NG .000 r 000 WO CE WOO FENCE,,w I ' I I � \.. � ;Z STOP BUILDING TI V I N OUS C -. '& - -:,G LOT 4, w'd 11 %I GASMETER 0-GASMETER Z;7 T - I -- '� I , \ - RAMP 11 L -4LECTRIC U►- SAM.►H BLOGEXPAqSION CONCRETE (123'X70 SLAB R I ra o % FA PAR�NG OFFSET F I LO SS XPA 'ION OF u I Cf TM O E B LITI EAST AL7 E .. ES TO (AROUND EMB E S) CLEAN-OUT 'RELOCATE CUEA�OLIT ac c �Ull it u 1� u 10 a LDINA // 1 S � 1 r r I BODY SETBAgK SHOP R r Ij CrGA ...... FENCE if JI EDGE OF —30' UTILITY EA4MENT - lPU - MPI L 0 e 1.07 so C C - Ala H dF- CONC r824.32 INV 7A. 16" CONC U VA 2 r .......... ...................... 2'BITUMtNOUS WEAR (TYPE 41) 2'EDTUMiNo BASE (TYPE 31) W A A a GRAVEL 5 EPA ED (C GR%; . . . ....... .... (PER ACT. INC.) Lcum or alt Ile E:JU.ST**G RIJILEIING SAW TRW 12' POPLAR PROPOSED COLORADO Fot*lrj —ISANTI DOGWOOD SAN.NH - W HMQlfFf22) SAVE 12' POPLAR TOP OF WALL ELEV. 894.0 Attachment 10 TOP OF WALL ELEV: 894.0 PROPOSED COLORADO ' BLUE .SPRUCE (6) B &B, 2.5 INCH CALIPER ISAN - n DOGWOOD - 24 HEIGHT (22) 2.5 GALLON POT �.� 89 - - -- ------ - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- 893 -------.----------------------- 7 = I� 892 . I -i I L --------------------- - - - - -- 891 rs i rs I x J= �- _ �� - �' --- � - -- - - -- -----=-----= - - - - -- 889 -J 1 r s �1 s 'IZ.=1= I I Z I =Z�I � -- - - - - - -- _-- - -- -- 888 U � I i L� �Z� L� �T�_I ° � - 88 �--- o 886 Q ry ^. . I = S PT U _ _ — — W - r s - r - r - r rT s rT - - - M. - - 885 7 �- �-L -�- -� � �- � L -�- Z � _ �r� 884 Q 883 LLJ --------- - - - - -- PROPOSED PARKING --- - - - - -- - - - - -- 882 LOT SURFACE WALL START -- - - - - -- 881 880 NORTH ELEVATION (LOOKING SOUTH AT WALL x'220 FEET zSRI z *&RU ,o• a+ PREPAI (PER I Retaining Wall 27 WMTED GRANULAR MATERIAL Attachment ll r aft� �N. EXI6TMG bOtiTK �.EVATION 3 N O MMA WN ISTAI. IOW "a. won" a a� nww rn+�srN. �nr /�A16 •rsnr+ LAY N ALII'!N FA" E 13 ❑ a era��w�w OIJ1M N nuw+ �s _ • �' r w EXIGTMG MW ELEVATION Existing Elevations 28 ---ww EX 6TMG EAST ELWAT{ON Attachment 12 ......... ...... �Ms MrA=m OM! rjWAMrJ SLVM "gtALw H4LL OAS! PAW CMJ • jL vm MTALLJC W WM PAMA MFJ MWH*M AM C SLVM M Oro on MAS-am MA I - TV . 19 ALAM COP fL%OttWrAMG ItMdgMWW AALUA Iwo O w OSOae WE6T MA NLEVATICN IM O Propo sed 29 0 4 4 —NO WWVWfWU — Ojww WAOM am Hff pwo.GLVMMTAAX _Qw AM SsOPW"CNf LOOM IOPBVM f eus MM MAWN efflovi .PAMANSLA?W epTOKATC14NOWS - oLvm MAAX I&WA MWWLEMI Elevations Z: ......... ...... �Ms MrA=m OM! rjWAMrJ SLVM "gtALw H4LL OAS! PAW CMJ • jL vm MTALLJC W WM PAMA MFJ MWH*M AM C SLVM M Oro on MAS-am MA I - TV . 19 ALAM COP fL%OttWrAMG ItMdgMWW AALUA Iwo O w OSOae WE6T MA NLEVATICN IM O Propo sed 29 0 4 4 —NO WWVWfWU — Ojww WAOM am Hff pwo.GLVMMTAAX _Qw AM SsOPW"CNf LOOM IOPBVM f eus MM MAWN efflovi .PAMANSLA?W epTOKATC14NOWS - oLvm MAAX I&WA MWWLEMI Elevations kq Attachment 13 r III Iii III i a LEI L LEI I I I I I i ri r ri I-�A I-iA 1- LEI L�� l�l I i l � to I I LIJ 1 � S 30 Attachment 14. all ' Ir ��I y � r i , � �, i r � � 1 r II ■I 11A SGA 104 11A 16 :L& 1 lie f/ lil 1N' u u u 1! lU W$ Ml 12.1 10 4. CA flu 132 oaf 14.1 L4 CA W U L 010 CA CA CA CA 0.0 U 0.0 CA ou L: CA CA 0.0 CA CA aj: 42 QU CA CA 04 010 on : III ��' - , a : `fir. 04 CA LO *4 OA).. lu 22 U 12 m 22 2.2. M Ll Ll tZ U U f� M-�-W 2J %I 2A 23 U 24 L+ M Lb U 2A 2.9 L6 U U 94 IS U� zo, 1A u w u w 2A u u 2A 14 Lo at LS 4.6 34 U Ll 24 W W 3A IS 34 a& U 1A SA IA 2A -L L-4MIM!: Al l 1: i 4 13 is u a W E Outdoor Lighti 31 ng Pian Attachment 15 En ineerin Plan Re view . skin Lot Egpansion . PROJECT: Schmelz Pa g PROJECT NO * tt • Erin Schacht and Chris Cave REVIEWED BY. E De artment, February 24, 2003 Maplewood Engineering . P • s ide Motors buildings at 1 ' proposing to expand one of the Country John Schmelz is p p g ed to com ensate for the loss of ' ed that the parking lot be expand p 36. It is also .propos ion is roposed for the area just east Hi g hway . • ex pans The parking lot ex pansion P end of the lot parking due to the building p .The proposed pond at the south P Embers lot at 1200 viking Drive p p and south of the 't will outflow into the existing storm sewer • drainage from the parking lot. From there i will treat drain g on th e vacated Cope Avenue right - of -wa y . is should be addressed: Thp fallowing eommen 1. 2. �3. 4. S. 6. percentage e of phosphorus and. TSS • treatment calculations. Determine the pe g Submit treatm requires that the BMP s meet the r the NURP pond. City ordinance q irement of 80 %. . removal for 60 % a nd the TSS removal requ horns removal requirement of phosphorus � _ ill that on the south side of the pond or w • plan? will there be parking nt #6 What is the parking P • ' -idee related eomme ) • Drive lane must be 24 we s be. a driving lane? . from the. the ond. As shown, the plan • acc ommodate vehicle protection . P chain. In Revise the plans to acc um rovide bollards with cable or . Suggestion.:- At a minim , P is not acceptable i.e.: shrubs and/or trees). (This .. landscaping to provide a visual barrier, addition, use 1 P g . of the Pond)- es along the north side, (Embers), P includ g • n all sides of the pond. Concrete curbing is required along DES construction permit. • app rovals and permits. Obtain NI' . Obtain R�VMWD apP 7. E:1 • system? Plan is difficult to read in d storm sewer connected to the existing sys sir estion: is the propose gg son not to tie into the existing storm sewer? t that area. Is there any rea en radial MII grate if a redundan • Connect to existing. storm sewer, use an op overflow inlet is desired. drive aisle. • obtain a 24-foot • Move driveway entrance o ver and widen to f lows - will, be located or armor • B structures where concentrated Areas of Provide curb inlets/CB - blanket where necessary. • i rap and permanent soil stabilization slopes with rip p concern that shall be addressed: t side of the pond. • f the end of the curb at the northeas • Flow coming of the end of the retaining wall. c oming off the Embers parking. lot near • Flow c g be concentrated. • Other locations where flow may be v e g etated with native n for the pond. The pond shall g Submit a landscape design pia P sha ll also be utilized around the grasses w/Forbes. In addition, shrubbery and trees upland p erimeter of the pond- 9. Where will the cleanout be relocated? 32 Attachment 16 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION • • permit revision to expand his John Schmelz applied fora conditional use pe ' ed WHEREAS, sales (both located closer than the requir' omobile re air and automobile sa . nonconforming automobile an addition to the Saab building and an residential property) The revision includes 350 feet to p ro p expansion of the automobile sales/storage lot. . S this p erm i t applies to Countryside Motors Automobile Dealership at 1180 WHEREAS, p 36 East. The legal description is: Highway. • • _• west 105.00 feet of the east 135.00 i tin Dealershi Le w lifton Addition and vacated .stree Description: The t Ex $ � 10 C feet of the north 30.00 feet of Block , accruing. • Additio exce t the south 30.00 feet 240.00 feet of Bloch 15 Clifton Add t p The east o f. To ether with that part of vacated Y � I in west of the east 135.00 feet there g r Cope Avenue accruing. - The east 24Q.00 feet of that part of Block 16, Clifton lying southerly of State Trunk Highway Number 36. dition I ing southerly of The west 110.00 p feet of that art of Block 17, Clifton Ad Y . State Trunk Highway Number 36. • to with that part of st 110.00 feet of Block 14, Cl The we Clift Addition, g vacated Cope Avenue accruing . et of Block 10, Clifton Addition, together The west 225.00 feet of east 255.00 feet .00 feet and • Street accruing, except the south 1'74 with that part. of vacated Duluth S except the north 30.00 feet thereof. • art of east 114 feet of the west 400 osed Sales Lot Le al Desc ti on . That p P rop s ou therly right-of-way line of Trunk Highway f eet of Block 17, lying south of the s Y 9 of the south t 400 feet of Block 14, lying north 36 and the east 114 feet of the wes n orth 98 feet . of the • east 290 feet of the west 400 feet of then 128 feet, and the Ramsey County, Minnesota, south 128 feet of Block 14, all fn Clifton Addition, Y subject to. roads. ' conditional use permit revision is as follows: y WHEREAS, the history of this co , • recommended that the city council approve March 3 20037 the planning commission recommen 1. On M , this permit. The city staff published a 3 2003 the city council held a publyo hea ring. coun cil 2. On March 1, � sur rounding p roperty owners. The coon ' in the p aper and sent notices to the sur 9 p nts. The nonce P p to s peak and present written statements. ave everyone at the hearing a chance p tall and tanning g reports and recommendations of the city s p council also considered rep commission. 33 IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the 'above- OW THEREFORE, BE � it revision because . described conditional use perm • rutted and operated to be in esi ned, maintained, constructed use would be located, d g d Code of Ordinances. . 1 • The 's.Com rehensive Plan an . conformity with the City p aracter of the surrounding area The use would not. change the existing or planned ch 2, would not deprec p roperty values. The use wou p 3. u i ment or methods of • activity, process, materials, eq p e a use would not involve any Y det rimental, disturbing or cause 4 • The n Brous, hazardous, at would be d� g noise, fare, smoke, dust, operation th because of excessive g � to an person or property, _off vibration, general nuisanc Y drainage, water run r flumes, water or air poll odor, interference or other nuisances. unsi htliness, electrical g .. cal streets- and would not imaI vehicular traffic raffic on to e , use would generate only. min tin or p roposed streets. 5. The-,use nsafe access on exis g p create traffic congestion or u services, including streets, uate public facilities and and 6. The use would be served by adeq ater an d d sewer systems, schoo . • n drainage structures, w . police and fire prot parks. public facilities or services. The use would not create excessive additional costs for 7 ' the site's natural and preservation of and incorporate The use would maximize the pres . 8. The the development design - scenic features .would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. g The use . • t. to the following conditions: Approval is subjec f community • ved b the city. The director o } • All construction shall follow the site plan appro Y ent may approve developm Y minor changes d within • S aab building must be starte • propose addition to the S end. The city The construction of the p p val for this addition shall e 2' council approval or the appro one year of city or one ear. a extend this Y council m ay deadline f m Duluth .. emerg vehicles, to or from There shall be no autom obile access, except em g Y 3. Street. right- of -way is prohibited . The ' loading or unloading ineered p o f automobiles on the public 4 • orous surfacese t d shall only be parked on designs paved or eng e 5. automobiles sha Y 34 6. The applicant will enter into a. formal easement agreement with St. Paul Regional Water Services and the City of Maplewood which satisfies both agencies' _ conditions for access to the public utility easements for water main (SPRWS) and sanitary'and storm sewer (City of Maplewood). 7. The city .council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 2003. p Y 35 ApLEV1/oOD PLANN ING COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE M MINNESOTA EAST MAPLEWOOD, 0 COUNTY ROAD B 9 183 ARCH 3, 2 MONDAY, M . 003 0 Highway 36) . side VW /Saab (118 g . �s�on — Schmelz Country itional Use Permit Revi • a. Con e Saab . el and expand the e 9 . ' ro os�ng to remod • chmelz is p p ile dealership at'1180 Roberts said John S 'de Motors automob Mr. d within his Countrys� have an automobile sales/showroom building locate et in area and will ha • sales /sh .. ill be 8,610-square-.f e ;s automobile • East. The addition w oses .to expand h Highway 36 addition, Mr. Schmelz . prop • ice fac�l�ty. In add , repair and sere t Em t into . a. vacant lot next Em ber's Restaurant. sales /storage to order to. from the Ember's owners in . purchased the new lot fr n ht -of -way) s said John Schmelz pure the vacated cope Avenue g Mr. Robert d survey reflected that county records, ex ' es /stora a lot. A Ian Y new lot.. city and c y and h sal g was. not part of_ the _ current) p side of the property melz's attorney is y located on the . south _ ears ago. Mr• Sch . • vacat b the city y art Of the lot. The . r eflect that it was va y ht -of -way is -legally p . • on of however, r the title and ensure the rig • r efoiti • • quiet tale action to clear vaca ted rig ht Therefore, a filing a q osal includes the vaca g chme is the fee inc luded with this prop reflects that Mr. S site plan inc � order from the court sho uld* be that the resulting approval sho . f -way the vacated right -o. . Owner of a south side of -square-foot addition forth . • ' ro osing an .8,610 squat mob ile re air /service said the applicant �s p p .. ha ve a new auto p Mr. Roberts � The addition well ha mobiles in an owroom /sales building ..servicing these auto the Saab sh dealership is cur .. h .The � the cit approves the or. the Saab dealership Saab buildings. If y . facility. f e Volkswagen and Service for types • in located behind the overflow repair and . ex�st�ng building existing re� air facility as . • • dealership will use the exi g p . addition, the deale p of vehicles. - e replaced • e parking stalls will b p • • 39 parking stalls. Th p to 200 the addition will remove p h will accommodate up The construction of n ext to Ember's, whic • • new sales /storage lot n b the addition of the y automobiles. le and storage of - would . be used for the sa • saleslstorage lot wo curb and gutter. The Mr. Roberts said the new bituminous and con not be constructed of bitu concrete cu tiles. City code does automobiles. It will old about 200 automo kin g a . be stripe but will h of p � Its unless there are par sales /storage. lot will n ve stri ed park,ng stalls e sales/storage lot ha p parking stalls proposed ire that an automobile or customer p g . 0 require tomers. There is no em fitted that shows drive for employees or cus •n tan must be subm stalls p drive aisles, a stripy g p ' o rder to ensure adequate but �n o a isles of. at least 24 feet in width. s to con in ue • mobile dealership m city wide with the auto o enforce • bach there is a proble y _ Commissioner Ross _ _ a ,What kind of option s does the city have t • �n the public right of w y th p eople ticketed. unloading vehicles p mon by having p • it could make some that, it seems like the city • not ified of that and if there was • t. If the city was note ' t has been done in the p as uation. r. Roberts said tha the sit an officer available, they co M uId be sent out to in as • ' restrictions the city h . he e nforceability of . • e is concerned about nforceab t . h site. It .seems Ike the C o mm issioner Trippler said looking at this Comm sent quite a bit of tim e • applicant. He has p q put on this ap plicant wants to and apparently nobody says anything )scant pp pp g oes ahead and does what ever g 'thin five feet. The put a new front on He said the built the Volkswagen thing up to within Y about it. Y .. . • on the front and it is within two or three feet of the lot.. the SAAB building and there is an overhang , • � f eet. He said the cars back in the SAAB lot that line and �t shouldn't be any closer. than five f Y park is on ro ert that they did not own. He feels real uncomfortable giving the applicant anything p p Y He has lived in the neighborhood. for that he s req uestin g because he is going to do it anyway h i q g the trucks unload cars anywhere .18 ears and he shops a lot at Menards. He has never seen Y re with yellow lane and the road curves and you but on the road. There is a two -lane road the y He said he even stopped and identi fied himself as a cannot see around the transport truck. H p , ' told the driver he can unload there and he told Mr. tannin commissioner for the city and he • p g he car dealerships are told the rules of er he was almost done and walked away. T p Tripp) t of the dealership. He said • the street and to only unload in the parking to p unloading vehicles on in ever h to ove the ke breaking the rule because noth g pp they are warned over and ove Y p them. • with Mr. Tri ter. She said this is the fourth time Commissioner Dierich said she totally agrees pp she has gone out to the site of a dealershi for an upcoming item for the planning commission p 'n i llegally, She thinks the police should be called g meetin when.there was a truck unloads g cars to ticket these dealership owners. • • w ith Glen Rehbein Companies, representing the Mr. William Mulcahy, a professional engineer w , ' mmission. He said the applicant acquired the open ap plicant, addressed. the commission the co pp d for stora and parking space. He said they lot because Mr. Schmelz has a desperate nee g ' or build a porous pave financial reasons, they deeded to go with t p orous p avement system. For co uld have built an underground drainage system p . � the system this would take the place • • d to abide b many of t of an ecosy He said the. client is prepare Y he comments made by . • . Y m the water main alignment. As a result of The will move the grading fifteen feet away from grading, is St. Paul staff y f moving the radi ' wall will be about a foot taller. Another result o g that .the retaining doesn't want a fence ten feet away from the alignm ent either so the fence also has to move. He • • through the landscaping that is ' � if the p ut the fence at fifteen feet that goes th g • proposed at the said y p to of the retaining wall and the ' o they have p rop osed to .put the fence at the p south side. S p p in abetter solution to n the fence and the trail which will end up bein landscaping will be between s a to have a • that use that trail along the south side. He ha ree g the residents and the people pa rking lot the retaining wall wall be moved to 20 feet from 24 -foot entrance and exit to his new p g � tails is not • residential side. He said the str�p�ng of the parking s the east property line on the reside • required. He sand car dealerships are very of ficient necessar nd the applicant .does not want it req n � � Id be with theirs ace.. The applicant doesn feel he s hould required to have stone columns or a q wi p tem or landsc around the storage lot. . closing ate vinyl fencing, an irrigation system electronic g g � Y o et. But the applicant is re extravagant then the client is prepared t g . These items are mo g the amount of space • e parking lot surface, which would increase p seriously of upgrading p g but it ose luxuries would look great in a different setting available for his business. He thinks th would be too costly. He is not in the car bus m bus in e ss to screen his company and property fro ine • business relies on exposure. In this day and potential customers and .the public driving by. His bu , • send resources on what would better his business. age, he feels �t would be prudent. to p . . „ . said if y ou • that is "sufficient is the retaining wall. He y Mr. Mulcahy said the proposed screening cars will be . cars will be completely screened because the ca look from the east and the south the c p sitting below grade. • n will be discussed at the CDRB Rob said man of the items Mr. Mulcahy is commenting o Mr. y meetin g on March 11, 2003. • wthe orous avement system will work and how Commissioner Rossbach said he is curious ho p p • and employees? • r. Schmelzs business a p that will benefit M ' . (lows a larger parking lot system is a system that a the orous pavement y ualit and the grade contro Mr. Mulcahy sa p the water q Y the storm water efore ou would not have to surface that incorporates lot surface. He said then Y • I element of that parking s so his business would within .the structura ei ht or nine parking space • m water and that takes up g put in the storm p .. more ace. p ore efficiently if he had . p operate erate better and m p t in a porous pavement system Mr. Mulcahy that he put p • ssbach asked who told C Ro have a storm water pond • be required to that the applicant would not • ter and would not be necessary. lot so a storm wa p Mr. Mulcahy said he would design t p arking g s o more smoothly having he applicant's truck de g the • Pearson asked wouldn't t would be no need to have Commissioner P ? He said then there w ce and exit on the property _ . the 24 -foot entrap a street? eliverin vehicles on th _ . transport trucks d g to the a plicant. Id defer that question p Mr. Mulcahy said he wou • VW /Saab, addressed the. • r Schmelz Countryside applicant and owner for At he does not have Mr. John Schmelz, the pp 24 - foot entrance and e • r as the entrance with the He measured the mission..He said as fa drive aisles though• com problem with the 24-fo • He has the p which is a little less then 6 a problem with that. is 70 inches wide wh . . p h is a truck/van, which the other conditions widest vehicle he has which With the setbacks and wid devastate his parking. . isle would de es sent i al that he has sales feet. 24 -foot drive a rt an d �t .s absolutely ess to 40% of his pr op e rty o f p roperty and how far he would loose close t he finds another piece p p to this whole thing. s that tive drivers to transpo storage. The alterna i i n he would have to have rt the re e he doegn t know. The is extra liab�l�ty and mo away that would . b expensive too. There Y the lots and that is p forth. to he par ki n g tial to vehicles back and fo c ars back and forth. is essen T p • n that road transporting c with the city and traffic going up and dow s always been a team player g he wants to go. He ha Y where a uncom etitive with th who scheme of ' o this he will becom p If he doesn t d 66 and was one s done whatever they r equest. ve been there since 19 he ha i own identity. They ha • wants the d oubled the amount of business and everyone six ears they have d • Ma lewood. In the .Last y • in the tax base, the real of the first dealerships p bus has increased at Countryside. His bu business is to have to ees to Maplewood i part of having a good e . p Y think he �s a pretty good guy• it and that is what state tax base and he thin • can et in and out eas y e not congested, peopl g ' environment, that it is g afr�endly th e y are striving to do. re were a number at the property that the r of cars ,� r when he was looking p . ' 'per Tn le who those cars belong to . Comm pp asked the applicant in that expansion lot, he already parked e are employee vehicles. Mr. Schmel z said some of the cars are con struction vehicles and som • using i n the lot? • asked if he was. already g .Commissioner Tr�ppler • the city that they main time in which the ' was discussed with Y had a ce s caused some extreme Mr. Schmelz said it with the cold weather it ha , • c finish the work and w e snow they can t push construction people co • business. Also, with th ,n and the backup of the . difficulties with the servic the snow off of the property dlocked, rt because they are Y permission to use that lot on a . melz and his dealership din that said staff gave Mr. Sch as the city s understan g Mr. Roberts 'nand the remodeling. It w temporary basis during the construct�o ' ' g oing on. He said-some of the • to �n mid- December but it is still g g e construction was to be complete have been very busy with, the elz has told the. city they ha rY ion has one longer an. construct d Mr . Schm g service to vehic les and it has put a strain on h is dealer shi p • for another site to • said his other option was to look ' 'Her Rossbach said Mr. Schmelz s facilit Commissioner dealership was .going to build a s torage Y • Mr. Rossbach said another dea p store his vehicles. e. That dealership was given the. same alershi 's location on Gervais Avenu shi separate, from the de p etc. as Mr. Schmelz s dealer p ate and stone colu . Landscaping conditions for fencing, g _ residential and commercial and he • facility was in the wonders why iddle of a was iven and that storage fac y ? g he should be asked less. Mr. Schmelz thinks Y _ . • street. He said on an icy day if • ve -foot setback �s very close to the Commissioner Mueller said af� He would rather slide into • hit a parked car in his dealership. . is ca starting sliding he would p h would do less damage. then hit a car, which . some landscaping . for 10 -foot front setback • den John Schmelz s . request . ommissioner Mueller moved to Y e lot at his - Countryside C x ans�on of the sales/storag ' ce from the right -of -way for the e p var ia n ce The cit is denying this request • i at 1180 Highway.. 6 East. Y . motors automobile dealership p . because: with the variance request. a. There is no hardship associated wit _ /storage lot p ro etback will not be consistent. with the adjoining b• proposed The ro osed 5 foot sales/ g , p roperty's p arking lot (Embers). p Y s leave no room for landscaping between sales /stora a lot.setbackwill lea the C. T h e p roposed 5 foot g . rove the curb appeal of the lot and the frontage road. Landscaping is needed to imp sales /storage lot. Commissioner Mueller. moved to adopt the resolution on pages 30 and 31. This resolution Motors approves a revision to the conditional use permit for The rev shones forC ountryside he e expansion f the automobile dealership located at 1 Highway 36 East. nonconforming automobile repair and automobile sales. (both located cl oser u required by the c de and re 350 feet to residential property), Approval - is based on the findings q subject to the following conditions (additions -are underlined; deletions are crossed out): roved b the city. The director of community All construction shall follow the site plan app Y be development may approve minor changes. The constructio val for this addition shall end. e d mu started within one year of city council approval or the appro city council may extend this deadline for one year. 1 a a a a s i • I w i i = • = i w II • • • % A • • .r • • Ind i _ a l t _ ' _ _ • • 1I i a a a i . I • I ..r In MON 11. a s a s a • •• i • i • w•• • w _ i • • • CI IM 9 -f - i 1 r%prc _ a a I • • iI RI 1%0 %.^a No a i a a a • • • • • • • • • • a � a n � a a Min i w • %ON a i i • • • // • • • i • _ • i s • • • .� • A I %of Inon Maw a • %0% a i a a a • 1 a %W# a %.0% a a 1 %.0% ZI w n ;f thCI_ n5tv Cintarmines a o a i i a• i a s a a w .. I •• • Biaggi a . • = I • w • • • • • • • L • LT - T % ;_oVL I In i = a i U-1 LA Y IF ev. a a • mtn tha- %.A own LO a • i e a a a i i s a a / _ _ w i 1_ • 9%.O%o - _ • • • • _ Nil InA4%.W a /I II _ a _ A Gs I a i s a a a• a• i ' •• •• a thin ro+ljy 'Q 7 1 a . a .. •I � I a II a = h • I • • • w • sh v to or from Duluth Street. c.e-. Ther . e • n vehicl a cc e ss, on the public ri ht -of - is _ prohibited. d. Loadin or unloadin of motor vehicles e Automobiles can only be parked on designated paved surfaces. f. The cit council shall review this permit in one year. Y Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes. - Desai, Dierich, Fischer, Monahan- Junek, Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler The motion is approved. 't council on March 24, 2003. This item goes to the CDRB on March 11, 2003 and to the ci y DRAFT OARp PLEWOOD COMMUNI TY DESIGN REVIEW B INUTES OF THE MA D MINNESOTA M BEAST, MAPL.EWOO , 1830 COUNTY ROAD S DAY 3 MARCH 11, 2003 TU E - s /Stora a Lot Expansion. - � ' n Addition and Sale g b. Countrysi de Motor s Saab Building 1180 Highway 36 East • sin to remodel and expand the existing Saab ' John Schmelz is propo g • d m Ms, F�nwall said Country Motors automobile dealership at 118 building. located within his ry will have an automobile sales /showroom bui g • • �n area .and • e addition will be 8,610-sq his automo.b�le Hi hway 36 East. The . • hrnelz roposes toexpand • ' ' In addition, Mr.. Sc _ p mends approval g slit . re commends rep air and service fac _ is Restaurant. Staff re p � cant lot next to the Ember's sales /storage lot into a va 'th several design conditions. of the proposal wi nkar asked if staff looked at the existing b Board member Sha -cast uilding materials and the pre • , � or compatibility and color. concrete panels f p _ Ms. Fin wall said no. she. had not. ' t to address the board. . • resentative of the applicant . 'r erson Ledvin.a asked a rep • Cha i-nnea olis, representing • Marshall Street NE �n M p • P Architects, 1220 Ma sed the board. Mr. John Larson with RS .Motors, both addres Mr, melz with Countryside John Sch a exterior of the building the owner, and Mr• t would be used on th • colors and materials that Larson reviewed the with the board. . building with standard • s a standard Saab b g ' sked Mr. Larson. if this � Chairperson Ledv�na a the desi n? p arameters that has to wo rk with to unify g p . . Inc. sets the standards. said es Saab USA, Mr. Larson y ddition. • Larson about the rooftop . equ p ment and vents on this a Chairp erson Ledvina asked Mr. Chairp . • • po rtion only. The existing • be on the service addition po the rooftop units would ' to reconstruct it to achieve a Mr. Larson said f but the are gong with • s metal roo y 't'ion and they feel wi roof will remain a star g t of the service adds . e are four roof -top units on p f sloping from west to better drainage.. Ther the roof and the roo p g • t wall being two feet above units will be screened - the height of the parapet Fart of those roof -top un . • even farther below the wa ll. • d ;n official to prov east the units will fall re wired by the building ' heig and they are isfaction of the city. also q . well b the parapet h g • ' he sat fairly Y of units don meet t in as required if those roo p screening • located as close to the ' said they would prefer that the rooftop units be Chairperson Ledvina he walls. parapet walls to ben efit the screening from t p resent�n • bein Companies, rep g • � E with Glen Reh � the • • MCCulhy, a Civil Landscape E g was brought �n to use Mr. William f board. Their company • hmelz addressed the bo Bated an underground the a l�cant John Sc r t The originally cr pp s pace on the pro perty y the board. The maximum amount of parking p ndin Ian submitted to rn ater rather than the po g p • • storm w t ff.. It storage fac for the s stem that does no any runoff p g os stem. It is a paving y to sit within the product is called the uni - y water the opportunity p system and it gives storm t y ou can design for ; a porous pavement y vement is sized. so tha y _ p lot surface. The pa s tructural layer of a parking is system before it infiltrates into the • he water is slowly released from th y - certain storm events. T nd initial) determined the uni t the two costs of these systems a Y round. Mr. Schmelz looked a t applicant's reluctance to ecosystem g nted to share with the .board, the app stem was too costly. He waded fence, decorative brick or y things, such as, a wrought iron fen , additional money on unnee g , hain -link fen spend t ate a black vinyl coated c ce,. co lumns, an electronically controlled entry gate, his mone stone co � .. e a I�cant, Mr. Schmelz, feels Y • and additional landscaping. Th pp irri system, r his customers. He said the items n his building and parking. lot fo would. be better spent o g re extravagant then he mo • if they were in a different setting, but are mentioned above.. are nice y o o with the ecosystem. . Mr. Schmelz has now decided t g The city will benefi n eeds to have for his car dealership him to ark more cars on his lot. Y reason he is .doing this is to allow p p roduct that has The case arkin lot. Also, here �s a because the will have a show p g fro this Y lz is re ared to be the first.. The ' it of M and Mr. Schmelz p p never been used in the . 0 y p and the have granted a efits of this orous paving system Y wate rshed district has seen the ben p grant towards the cost of this porous paving system. • • rant but the . waters waters Mr.. McCulhy s hed. district has don't know the conditions of this g aid they Ve avin �s stem. elsewhere. Mr. . cost of installing this alternate p • g Y • allocated $20,000 towards the .n White Bear Lake called • similarities to another ,protect they did cCulh said this design has similar staff conditions, for M y s problems with some of the t proj Mr. Schmelz ha p planting trees and the Cum p 1 irrigation system. He said pla g • to find water services for the g y the sa instance having s. Trees can produce sap and p • • ' problem could .eventually cause p add�t�onal landscape g limbs can break is d off and land on • ca rs and can cause damage.. Tree d to get off the ca tions chan ed if possible. cars and damage them. The applicant would like these con d itions g this paving system looks like? Board member Shankar asked what p g � � -inch Ion He said once these paving ere is a a that is /2 inch X 1 g water Mr. McCulhy said there gap every couple inches and the w • � ells the size of your thumb digit e rY p stones interlock, it leaves c sta ble in northern climates. Two ' po rous s ave m e nt .system i s very sta drains into them.. This po p ation Control Association on d a seminar held by the Minnesota Irri g months ago he attende communit was there to see it. everybody in the storm water Y pavement systems and rY y towards this inno p orous p tatement b granting $20,000 . wa tershed district is making a s Y The Ova Schmelz. pavement system for his client, John porous pa Y • owner and a licant for Countryside a 36 East in Maplewood, own pp elz; 1180 Highwa of what is currently on the Mr. John Schm He showed the board some photos . Motors, addressed the board. he wanted to show the lot. Mr. Schmelz said rt he urchased for his sales grope Y p o . _ ow he will �m /o board h rove the land 150 p • � staff about the striping plan. Is it c orrect that the applicant Board member Longrie -Kline asked • B t the p ark spaces? to strip the drive aisles and no p g only needs p the striping Ms. Finwall said M of the discussed his concerns with staff r egarding r. Schmelz discu �. indicated that only the • que stion to the Fire Marshal and he arkin stalls. Staff directed wide as opp osed the que h osed to the 24 foot in parking g ould need to be 20 feet w drive aisle itself in the parking lot w that the parking . rt. Because of that staff is not pr oposing . width as indicated in the staff repo is prop osed. in that lot, - s customer or employee parking p p aces be strip at this time unles spaces p .which. staff understands it i not. • tion for the wrought iron • e thinks the staff. recommenda Board member Longrie -Kline said she scale dealership. BO c onsistent in character with an up _ fence decorative stone columns, etc. is c • e vacant lot but she also thinks • the applicant is cleaning up th She certainly appreciates that pp a dealership and it would look- s consistent with. an upscal e conditions listed by staff are sa f�allin onto the cars that the clarification regarding the p g • the property d for . nice around . She aske p p Y from trees and doing damage• . additional landscaping on the • requirements staff wanted McCulh said in the landscaping q said an tree that would get Mr Y on the north. He . Y west -and there is already landscap east and to a signif height hei ht could drip onto the cars. • co nted that do not omit sap? • ed if there uld be trees pla �d member Longr�e -Kline ask . Board Mr. McCulhy said there are varieties of trees that do not omit sap. with staff to select the correct tree • � perhap the a licant could work w . it erson Ledvina said perhap pp , ng. Chap s from happening. to eliminate any sap problem p varieties . Board member Shankar asked staff what was to the eas t of this p roperty? • another single- family . . a s ingle-family house and • �s .combined business and g Ms. F�nwall said �t . a house. • Id staff if the vinyl- coated fence would a better division p Board member Shankar asked s ed fence? Boa me rather than achain -Ink between t he lot and the single-family home. . non-conforming use in that this • the expansion of a non g Il said the city is approving p . Finwa city ordinance to be up to 350 Ms tomobiles is required by the y lot or sales /storage l osin to come w p arking lt for au this case, the applicant �s prop g w ithin 20 feet o .. t from residential property. In be mi tigating conditions tha fee at staff feels there should g • I p Because , sin le- family n homes. res�dent e of th p p bu siness from the surrounding g • rotect this commercial bu shield and p i enhanc over a regular chai Staff feels that the black - vinyl- coated chain hain link fence is an enhanc Ink fence with barbed wire on the top. • _ ' ments r the fencing. • with Ms. Lon ne -Kline 's com 9 Ledvina said he agrees wi g ate and could be Chairperson n electronically controlled g ' 'kit should be required to have a i should also be He doesn't thin in front of the dealers .1p p • • is o inion, the chain -link fence d when you see eliminated. In h p has a nice appearance an Y the front of the Saab building aced. He thinks to the staff recommendation replaced. eat. He would like to add ain -link fence, it has no curb app acin . it with the same type. the ch t of the dealership and repl g I of the chain -link fence in iron is quite a lot of money the remova � ra a lot. In his opinion, there q required in front of the sales /sto g landscaping and an of fence req • • n architectural element one to the site. s, p g • building. The addition of a inve in the bu g hat is being d rove expense compared to g • compatible ll p arch atible fence is a sma p • a earance from the street. • stands the need to have a nice pp e Larson said the client under fencing in the front of th Mr. req uire the need to have g t does not want nor does he q I�en tin this situation. He said The c at may be. appropriate, but no • With a different building, th Y • • does allow the client's building. 'over the top. Requiring fencing s this requirement is a bit the client think q customers to see the cars. . t the city is looking • opi nions that were shared but Y dvina said he appreciates the op h ave already been Chairperson Le The changes that with a higher standard for the property. for something w g _ ' ns He is willing to • e staff recornmendatio • should continue with the hose elements. e very nice and sh a nd staff regarding t made ar � out with the applicant a . entrust the details to be worked o plans date - stamped January 24, 2003, for the e Board member Shankar moved to approve the p expansion to Countryside Motors d addition an sales /storage lot owner proposed Saab building 36 East. Approval is subject to erty automobile dealership at 1180 Highway the prop additions are. in bold and deletions have a str ike doing the following: (changes.or through) ermit for this a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building p project. royal and p Signs shown ;elevations are not part on the site plan and building of this app will require separate sign permits.. or building c. Submit the following for. staff ,approval before the. city issues a grading p ermit: Tans. These plans shall a. Final grading, paving, drainage, utility and erosion control p meet the requirements of the city code and the city engineer. b. Address all of the concerns (Tentioned below) to the satisfaction of the St. Paul Regional Water Services: (a) Verify location of all water mains within the property. Verify hat the necessary easements exist for all water mains.. (b) y for the new Relocate the proposed training wail and subsequent grading (c) ora e lot so that it is no closer than 15 feet from the centerline of sales /st g e Avenue right -of -way. the existing water main in the vacated Cop to all water (d) Ensure. the St. Paul Regional Water Services has access mains on the property. fi Verify the location of the. water services to Ember's Restaurant and any grading over the water services. melz is the fee . owner of the. 30 -foot wide p ��onn of he (3) Verification that John Sch that runs along the south po vacated Cope Avenue right -of -way expanded sales /storage lot property. hn + . The plan must include (4) drive aisles that are at least 20 feet in width. (5) A revised site plan showing: lot is setback 20 feet from the eastern a) that the new sales /storage residential property lines be p) that the existing fence in front of the Saab b� ilden aired removed and replaced with descr bed belo ' to q north sales /storage lot fenc (6) ( 7) (a) A row of columnar trees (narrow trneW S ales /storage �o itae or unaens� ( b) between Ember's parking lot and the Replacing the Colorado blue spruce with Black the row of Colorado blue spruce and lsanti hills spruce and extending Wall (both south. and east, dogwood along the top of the entire retaining adjacent both residential properties). d should be vegetated with native grasses WandF�ortion of Na (d) The pond lanted on the upl p shrubbery and, trees should be p perimeter of the ponds areas, excluding landscaping w in the pond, must have ith (e) All landscaped an � �ncieraround irrigation systems the prop osed fence and' gate.- The e� stone north elevation shou d ip�eucast Elevations of p P decorative fence with brick, on concrete columns a44 the fronfi of the sales/storage lot; and a -black vinyl coated chai vl of st ff. n The * sides s and rear of the sales/stor feet subject #o the app fence may be up to a height o A revised landscape plan to include: s to be planted in front of the sales/storage lot, along the (a) Trees and shrub p frontage road. (9) GAt1 w••�• - - J lighting and photometric plan. The revised plan shall show t e A revis ed outdoor relocated lights)., and that the light height and style of all. outdoor lights (including all outdoor lights does not exceed .4 foot candles at all property illumina tion from lines. escrow. or an irrevocable letter of credit f cost of the works exterior A cash nt of the improvements. The amount shall be 150 p erce the following before occupying the sales /storage lot: d• Complete utter. ( 1) Install all bituminous or engineered porous surface and curb and g �2) Stripe all drive aisles. the a roved fence. Instal pp ( ished in the • sales /storage lot is fin • landsca by June 1 if the lot if it is Install all required land p g of the sales /storage (4) I n weeks of completion fall or winter, or within six finished in the spring or summer: ( 5) Install all requ i red exterior lights. • in the Saab building: he following before occupy g e. Complete t . • r improvements' Install all required e xterior p ( idential - � om streets or adjacent r _ eq uipm ent visible fr close to en all roof mounted , sho be located as . (2) Scre ment and vents sho p ert (all roof -top equip levation). p p y possible at the highest e the parapet walls as poss p ct to staff ' trash enclosure, subject sters are enclosed in a Ensure all trash dump e. ( be out trash storag app roval, if there would app •. temp occupancy if. • the city may allow temp rY requ work is not done, f. If any requ Ith safety ty or • ential to the public hea , • es that the work rs not ess 1 The cy determines welfare. held b the City of • cash escrow Is h Y uired letter of credit or r or contractor shall The. above -required •rim rovements. The owne ( 2) required exterior p anc Map for all req nts b � June 1 if occup of the p d exterior rmproveme Y e building if any unfrnrshe s of occupancy of th c 'ter or within six week building s in the fall or , g or summers occupancy is in the spring p • community. development may All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of . g. approve minor changes. e Shankar • _ — C1e-Klrn . Board member Longue -Kline seconded. Ayes Ledvina, Long Boa . motion , assed. The p • March 311 2003.. • city council on Monday, This item will go to the Agenda Action by - Council REPORT SUMMARY Dot Eli Applicant: City f ", ty Maplewood 77.4 Site Address: 189 209, 211 and 215 Lar enteur Aven ue and 1701 Adolphus Street Existing Zoning: Sin I - . al g e Dwelling Residential Proposed Zoning: Multi I - • Multiple e Dwelling Res�dent�al Land Use: . Sing le- Dwelling Residential Proposed Land Use: Medium - d um Residential CitY Council Hearin D . Hearing ate.. March 31, 2003 60 -Day Dead -line: _ _ Not Applicable Project Description: #ion: . p The city of Maplewood is prop t rehe p p 9 o rezone and change the comprehen nsive land use plan on the five city-owned r • tY properties described ab ove.. The proposal I includes rezoning g from Single- Dwelling Res�denti al 1 R - Multiple' Residential Residential ( R-1) to g dents! (R -3) and the com re !an from p hens�ve land use p Single- Dwelling Residential (R-1) to • • dant�al (R -3M) in order to acco Medium Multiple-Dwelling g mmodate the future development of. u to 11 townhouse units. There is no development prnent proposal for the townhouse units at this time. Approval of the developmen • p nt w�fi require a separate public hearing. g Request: in order to devel � c it y op townhouses 'on the f #ve ci -owned properties, c� counc tY p perties, the ty I must approve the rezonln • g and comprehensive land use Ian change as described above. State law r p g requires a two vote (4 votes) b the cit us plan changes council for comprehensive land u Y . Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning nd comprehensive land use la g plan change from R -1 to R -3M. On Febru commiss a ry 19, 2003 the planning g on recommended approval of the rezoning plan change from R- _ g and land use g 1 to R 3M. The plannin commission • g also made a motion to allow nom more than 8 units on the property for this r • t . rtY proposal and that the city be held to the same development and Y _ p design standards required b private developers.. On March 18 .2 Y p 003, the housing redevelopment authori ro p � recommended ap val of the rezoning and land use lan ch R -3M. p ange from R -1 to MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DATE: INTRODUCTION Project Description Richard Fursman, City Manager Shann Finwall, Associate Planner_ Rezoning and Comprehensive Land Use Plan Change City of Maplewood 189 209, 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street March 24, 2003 The city, has acquired five single - family houses located on the northwest corner of Larpenteur Avenue and Adolphus Street with the city's Housing Replacement Program funds. (See location map on page 8.) As you recall, the city originaily purchased three of these houses after they were flooded during a rainstorm in April. 2001. ' The two adjacent older houses, which were not flooded, were purchased. by the city last year in order to combine all five properties to create a more comprehensive land use plan. The city is now proposing to rezone and change the comprehensive land use plan for the five P city -owned properties (189, 209, 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street). The city is proposing this change to accommodate the development of up to 11 townhouse units in the future. The development of the townhouse units will require a separate review and is not being considered at this time. Requests To proceed with this proposal, the city council must approve the following: g 1.. Zoning change for the five city - owned properties from single- dwelling residential R -1 to multiple - dwelling residential (R -3); and 2. Comprehensive land use plan change for the five city -owned properties from single+ . dwelling residential' (R-1) to medium multiple- dwelling residential (R -3M). Background On December 1.3, 1999, the city council approved a Housing Replacement Program in order to improve the condition of the city's housing stock. ` On July 23, 2001, the city council authorized the purchase of three houses at 209,' 09 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue with - Housing Replacement Program funds. On March 4, 2002, the planning commission reviewed the redevelopment options for the Larpenteur Avenue properties and agreed that if all five lots were obtained, rezoning to a higher density would be a good redevelopment strategy. On April 9, 2002, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority reviewed the Yredevelopment p options for the La nteur Avenue properties and recommended that the city maximize the returns from the three lots purchased by purchasing the adjacent two lots and developing townhouses. On May 13, 2002, during a city council workshop, the City council directed staff to negotiate the purchase of 1701 Adolphus street and 189 Larpenteur Avenue. The city council also stated that the townhouse approach for the area seemed appropriate. On September 23, 2002, the city council authorized the purchase of 189 Larpenteur Avenue with Housing Replacement Program funds. On October 28, 2002, the city council authorized the purchase of 1701 Adolphus Street with Housing Replacement Program funds. On December 9, 2002, during a city council workshop, the city council authorized city staff to p Y Y begin the public hearing.. process for the rezoning and comprehensive land use plan -change from single - dwelling residential (R-1) to medium multiple - dwelling residential (R -3M). DISCUSSION Existing Conditions Four of the houses have been demolished (189, 209, 211 and 21.5 Larpenteur Avenue). The previous owners are renting the house at 1701 Adolphus Street until .their new house is built in the spring . or early summer of this year. Demolition of this last house will be accomplished by the city soon after. The combined land area of all five lots is 79,992 square feet, or 1.84 acres.. Approximately two- . q. pP Y thirds of this area is considered developable because of the pond and required setbacks from the pond, as well as a future storm sewer to be placed in the center of the property. Zoning and Land Use Changes All five city -owned lots are zoned and guided as single - dwelling residential (R-1)., (See attached existing zoning and land use maps on. pages 9 and 10.) Properties located on the corner of .Larpenteur Avenue and Agate Street, directly to the west of the five city -owned properties, are planned and zoned double - dwelling residential (R -2). The opposite corner, across Agate Street, is planned and zoned multiple- dwelling residential (R -3). Therefore, changing the five city - owned properties to a higher- density zoning district and land use plan classification will complement the existing land uses. The city council reviewed two redevelopment proposals for the Larpenteur Avenue properties last December. (See redevelopment proposals attached separately.) Proposal One shows the five lots rezoned to double- dwelling residential (R. 2) for a total of six units, and Proposal Two shows them rezoned to medium multiple- dwelling residential (R -3M) for a total of 1,1 units. Pf000sal One - Double - Dwelling, Residential Within the R -2 zoning district, the permitted uses include single and- double - dwelling units (no multi -unit townhouses). The city's comprehensive plan does not define the maximum density allowed within the R-2 zoning district. Therefore, the density is limited by the allowable lot size and lot width as defined in the city's zoning Code. Within the. R -2 zoning district, the lot size and width required for double dwellings is 12,000 square feet in area and 85 feet in width for interior lots and 100 feet in width for corner lots. The five city -owned properties combined equals 79,992 square feet in area. Dividing the lot area by Larpenteur Avenue Properties 2 March 24, 2003 12,000 square feet would create a total of 6.66 double dwellings, or 12 units, that could be constructed on the lot. However, due to the inflexible lot -width requirements, the total number of double dwellings that could actually be constructed on the five city -owned properties would be three (six units). Pr000sal Twos- Medium Multiple- Dwelling Residential Within the R -3 zoning district, the permitted uses include multiple dwellings (including multi -unit townhouses). Within the city's comprehensive plan, the maximum density allowed within the R -31VI land use is six units per acre. If the five city- owned properties were rezoned to R -3M, a maximum of 11 townhouse units could be constructed (1.84'acres times six units equals 11.04 units). The R -3 zoning district is also less restrictive than the R -2 zoning district with no minimum lot size or lot width. Because of the inflexible nature of the R -2 zoning district, the city council felt that the best rezoning and land use plan change alternative would be R -3M. (See proposed rezoning and land use. change maps on - pages 11 and 12.) This scenario would allow for a maximum of 11 townhouse units on the five city -owned properties. Redevelopment Scenario In the newly created single-family Gladstone Park plat, the city was successful in acting as the developer in platting and selling the land. Staff foresees the same development scenario with the Larpentuer Avenue properties. However, unlike the platting of single - family homes, platting of townhouses is not possible until a development proposal is created. This proposal would be finalized after the sale of the land to a developer. In the meantime, .the city should change the zoning and comprehensive. land use plan to reflect the desired number of units. As stated above, rezoning the property to R -3M would allow for up to 11 units on the site. However, the actual number of units that could feasibly be built on the site may be limited by variables such as grading and drainage, location of storm sewer, wetland delineation, and setbacks. City staff is ,creating a development scenario that will take into account all of the above - mentioned variables. The development scenario, along with a list of public works tasks and associated costs, will be presented to the city council for concept plan approval. The concept plan will set the number of. units, up to 11, and other development conditions for the site. This will be used as a guide for the sale of the property to a developer. committee Actions On February 19, 2003, the planning commission recommended approval of the zoning and Land use plan change from single - dwelling residential (R -1) to medium multiple - dwelling residential (R- 3M). The planning commission also made a motion to allow no more than 8 units on the property for this proposal and that the city be held to the same development and design standards required by private developers. (Refer'to the 2/19/03 planning commission minutes attached.) On March 18, 2003, the housing redevelopment authority (HRA) recommended approval of the. zoning and land use plan change from single - dwelling residential (R -1) to medium multiple- dwelling residential (R -3M). (Refer to the 3/18/03 HRA minutes attached.) Larpenteur Avenue Properties 3 March 24, 2003 RECOMMENDATIONS Adopt the zoning map change resolution on page 13. This resolution changes the zoning map for five city -owned properties (189, 209 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1.701 Adolphus Street) from single - dwelling residential (R -1) to multiple - dwelling residential (R-3Y The city is making this change because: a. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. b. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. C.". The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. d. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services :and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopt the land use plan change resolution on page 14. This resolution changes the comprehensive land use plan map for five city -owned properties (189, 209, 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street) from single - dwelling residential (R -1) to medium multiple- dwelling residential (R -3M). The city is making this. change because: a. The site serves well as a transition between the double - dwelling property to the west and the commercial property to the east. b. The site meets the city's policies for medium multiple- dwelling residential uses since it: 1. 2. 1) Includes a variety of housing types for all types of residents. 2) Supports innovative subdivision and housing design., c. The site meets the city's goals for medium multiple - dwelling residential uses: 1) Provides for orderly development. 2) Protects and strengthens neighborhoods. 3) Preserves significant natural features where practical. 4) Minimizes the land planned for streets. 5) Minimizes conflicts between land uses. 6) Provides a wide variety of housing types. 7) Integrates developments with open space areas, community facilities and significant natural features. Larpenteur Avenue Properties 4 March 24, 2003 CITIZEN COMMENTS I surveyed the owners of the 17 properties within 350 feet. of the fiv e city - owned properties. Of the eight responses received, one. was in favor of the ro osal p p ,three were in favor with minor concerns,* and flour were opposed: In Favor 1. Anonymous: We would be in favor of a zone charge if you put in a higher -class townhouse that would be purchased rather than rented. We would u d no# want to see low rent housing put. in because we consider that to be more of a burden #o us taxpayers for maintenance and policing. We already have a drug p roblem in th 9 p e park down the block. Concerns 1. Shirley M. Tau ner, 1730 Agate Street g g t eet N. Although I have no current objection to the proposed rezoning, I have .concerns regarding parkin for 11 townhomes in that hat small area and possible traffic implications on Larpenteur so close to 35E and with the ex speed limit. 2. Shirley Walker, 1748 Onacres# - Curve N. I would have no problem with nice town houses being built providing they are sold to individual owners a • n t as rentals" Rental units can mean problem units. Thank you. 3. Michael & Glennd Sculley y y, 6 Onacres# Curve. N. We would probably prefer s i ng le . family housing, but # ownhomes are OK. We - g would support this proposal - but we hope this will be affordable housing.. Against 1. Allan C. Button, 1744 Onacrest Curve N: We would rath not have you rezone the property. We would like to see single dwelling (R 1) houses built there but w• . filled in so wou � with the land y d be on higher ground which would reduce the chance of flooding . the 2: Loretta B. Lonetti, 1722 Agate Street - g t eet N. I would like to see them stay single- dwe(lin residential -• no changes. g . 3. L. E. Bet#in er, 1714 Agate 9 g Street N. We would like to keep neighborhood in sin le- dwelling residential -- R 1. We have enoug gh apartments, townhouses and projects around this neighborhood; we don't need an more around d here.. There is enough traffic and noise with 35E & Larpenteur Avenue, with the bus stop # the end of Larpenteur Agate. It is very p _ penteur and A 9 ry noisy and polluted in summertime now. 4: Charles J. Berglund, Sr. 1699 Agate Street N. We could use more open space on this side of Maplewood. I believe this would be a erfect - s of for a p p n ature trail with parking off of Adolphus Street. Paved trails with lighting, clean u around the . chance p e pond. This could be a rare ce to do something nice with this area. Don't we real) have h townhouses? y enough Larpenteur Avenue Properties 5 March 24, 2003 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site Size: 79 square feet, or 1.84 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Land SURROUNDING LAND-USES North: Pond (Zoned Open Space) South: City of St. Paul Single Family Homes East: Duplex (Zoned R -2) West: Sinclair Gas Station (Zoned BC) PLANNING Existing zoning: Single- Dwelling Residential Existing Land Use: Single -Dw' elling Residential CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL 1. Rezoning: Section 36 -485 of the zoning code re uires that the city council make the following findings to rezone property: ..a. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning node. b.. 'The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use _ of the property adjacent to the. area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. C. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and. the, public welfare. d. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient P g , and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 2. Land Use Plan Change: There are . nos specific criteria for land use Ian changes. An p p g y change, however, should be consistent with the goals and policies in the comprehensive plan. Seven specific goals apply to this proposal: a. Provide for orderly development. b. Protect and strengthen neighborhoods... C. Preserve significant natural features where practical. d. Minimize the land planned for streets. Larpe.nteur Avenue Properties 6 March 24, 2003 e. Minimize conflicts between land uses. f.. Provide a wide variety of housing types. g. Integrate developments with open space areas, Co. mmunity- facilities and significant natural features. In addition, three specific residential policies apply to this proposal: a. Include' a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic,. racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, townhouses, manufactured homes, single- family housing, public - assisted housing and low- and moderate - income housing, and rental and owner- occupied housing. b.. Support innovative subdivision and housing-design. C. The city will not approve new developments without providing adequate facilities and services, such as streets, utilities, drainage, parks and open space. P:comdev\secl8\Larp. Prop. Rezoning Attachments: I. Location Map 2.: Existing Zoning Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Proposed Zoning Map 5. Proposed Land Use Map 6. Zoning Map Change Resolution 7. Land Use Plan Change Resolution 8. February 19, 2003, Planning. Commission Minutes 9: March 18, 2003, HRA Minutes 10. Redevelopment Proposals (Separate Handout) Larpenteur Avenue Properties 7 March 24, 2003 Attachment 1 0 Ui LO M CU +r N Larpenteur Avenue Attachment 2 D D Larpenteur Avenue City of St. Paul R-1:'Single-Dwelling Residential R Double - Dwelling Residential R -3: Multiple - Dwelling Residential B-C: Business Commercial n LO M N (6 Cn N Existing Zoning Map Attach 3 Cit of St. Paul R-1: Sin - Dwellin Residential R -2: Double-Dwellin Residential. R-3M: Medium Multiple - Dwellin Residential R-3H: Hi Multiple-Dwellin Residential. LBC: Limited Business Commercial XT I UO) CU (D WE Existin L n M g a d Use ap 10 Larpenteur Avenue law Ill, 'Its I � .............................. Cit of St. Paul R-1: Sin - Dwellin Residential R -2: Double-Dwellin Residential. R-3M: Medium Multiple - Dwellin Residential R-3H: Hi Multiple-Dwellin Residential. LBC: Limited Business Commercial XT I UO) CU (D WE Existin L n M g a d Use ap 10 Larpenteur Avenue ED ;"u � 1,11111 IIII .I a rnPntPi i r Axio m is r +7 R -1: Single - Dwelling Residential R -2: Double- Dwelling Residential R -3: Multiple - Dwelling Residentia 3 -C: Business Commercial Proposed onina,Man Atta 6-K-ment 5 . .. ................ ............. ................. . ............ ................ .... ........... I- ............. ............... Larpenteur Avenue City of St. Paul R-1: Single - Dwellin Residential R-2: Double-Dwellin Residential R -3M: Medium Multi Residential R -3H: High Multiple - Dwellin Residential. LBC. Limited , Business Commercial E r r T I to M. (B L a nd Us e I� ropose d M ap S 12 Att ZONING MAP achment 6 .CHANGE . RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City f M a p lewood. . y p ewood has proposed a change to the city zoning single dwelling residential (R -1) to multiple-dwelling y 9 map from p ing residential . WHEREAS, this chang applies A g pp s to 189, 209, 211 and. 215 Larpenteur Avenue Adolphus Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. 1701 WHEREAS, the history f this ch ' rY ange is as follows: 1. On February 9 2003 the � rY a planning recommended that the ci approve the rezoning chang council ?• Can March 31 2003 the � city council held a public hearing. City taff published • ' y p a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notic to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted th public hearing whereby ll public speak and resen y P is present were given a chance to p t written statements. The city council also considered d reports and recommendations from the c ity staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Eb that the city council approve the above - escribed change the zoning map for the followin r • g reasons: '! . The proposed change p ge is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of ' the zoning code. 2. The proposed change p g will not. substantially injure or detract from the use of property or from the character of #h neighboring e neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the p roposed p y p p change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will I serve the best interests and conveniences of the co mmun i ty, where applicable, and the public welfare. ommunity, 4. The proposed chang would • g uld have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, public se facilities, g nt, and economical extension of p services and such as public water, sewers police and fire protection and schools. ' The Maplewood City ouncil • y adapted this resolution on 2003. 13 Attachment 7 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City f Maplewood Y p d has proposed a change to the city' land use Ian from single- dwelling residential (R-1) to medium m p s mu ltiple-dwelling residential (R-3M). WHEREAS, this change applies, t g pp o 189, 209, 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. WHEREAS, .the history f this change • rY ange �s as follows: . 1. On February 19, 2003 the Ian p ning commission held a public hearing. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review p and dent notices to the surrounding. property owners. The. planning commission conducted the public • public present were p hearing whereby all .given a chance to speak and present written statements. The . Planning commission recommended that th . e city council approve the plan amendments. 2. On March 31, the i c #y council discussed the land es use plan chang The considered .reports and recommendation Y ns frorr� the planning commission and city staff. NOV1/ .THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described land use plan change for the following re asons. * easons. • . 1. The site serves well as a .. - transition between the double-dwelling ro art to the w the commercial property to the e g p Y west and . p Y east. 2. The site meets the cit .. . ty policies for medium multiple- dwelling residential use it: 9 s since a. includes a varlet of housing Y g for all types of residents. b• Supports innovative subdivisio • is�on and housing design. 3. The site meets the cit 's y goals for medium multiple dwelling residential uses since it: a. Provides for orderly devel o p ment. . Y p t. b• Protects and strengthens ' g neighborhoods. C. Preserves significant natural features tares where ,practical. d. Minimizes the land lann p ed for streets. e. Minimizes conflicts between land uses. f• Provides a wide variety f housing 9 t YPe s. g. Integrates developments with open • p n space areas, community facilities and significant natural features. The Maplewood . Cit . Council adopted pted this resolution on 2003. 14 Attachment 8 PARTIAL MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAP'LEWOOD, MINNESOTA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2003 - 1. CALL TO. ORDER Chairperson. Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. . 11. ROLL. CALL .Commissioner Tushar Desai Absent Commissioner Mary Dierich Absent Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Present Commissioner -Matt Ledvina Absent Commissioner Jackie Monahan -Junek Present Commissioner Paul Mueller Present Commissioner Gary Pearson Present Commissioner William Rossbach Present Commissioner Dale Trippler Present Staff Present; Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager Bruce Anderson, Parks & Recreation Director Chris Cavett Assistant City Engineer Lisa . Kroll, Recording Secretary V. PUBLIC HEARING c. Larpenteur Avenue Redevelopment Site (City of Maplewood) M Roberts said the city has acquired five single- family houses located on the northwest corner of Larpenteur Avenue and Adolphus Street with the city's Housing Replacement 'Program funds. The City of Maplewood originally purchased three of these houses after they were flooded durin g a rainstorm in April 2001 The two adjacent older houses, which were not flooded, were purchased by the city last year in order to combine all five properties to create. ra more comprehensive land use plan. 15 Mr. Roberts said the . city is proposing to rezone and change the comprehensive land use plan for the five city -owned ro erties (189, 209 p p , 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street). The . city is proposing this change to accommodate the development of u to 11 p � townhouse units in the future. The development of the townhouse units will require a separate review and is -not being considered at this time. Mr. Roberts said the combined land area of all five lots is 79, sq uare feet, or 1.84 acres. Approximately two thirds of this area is considered developable. because of the pond and required uired setbacks from the and q pond, as well as a future storm sewer to be placed in the center of the property. The city council reviewed two redevelopment _ ro osals for the Larpenteur p P p p Avenue properties last December. Proposal Line in the staff _report shows the five lots. rezoned to double-dwelling ouble- dwellin residential (R-2) for a total of six . g Units,. and Troposal Two -shows them rezoned to medium multi le- dwellin p g residential (R -3M) , fora total of 11 units. Mr.. , Roberts said in. the newly created single Gladstone Park plat, the g Y p , city was successful in acting as the developer in platting and selling. the land.. Staff foresees the same development scenario with. the Larpenteur Avenue properties. Mr. Roberts said the city should change the zoning and comprehensive land use plan to. reflect the desired number of units. Once this is complete and all houses are removed from the site, the city's public works department should prepare the, site for development including installing storm sewer and rough grading. Unlike the single - family Gladstone Park plat, however, )platting of a townhouse development is not possible until a development plan -is approved. This proposal would be finalized after the sale of the land to a builder. Commissioner Trippler stated he thought when the commission planning looked at this , before it was decided that the exit should not be onto Larpenteur Avenue because of traffic concerns. He asked staff if that had changed? Mr. Roberts said traffic is still a concern of the city. He said the plan that is i � included in the staff report is a conceptual plan done by staff. If there were a creative . or innovative developer they would like to have the exit onto Adolphus Street. The factors that come into play are the storm sewer, the pond and the number of units and the way Y it lays out. 16 Commissioner Rossbach said he thinks it is critical that the city. has the same standards that the city asks the developer to have. He thinks the city should stay with the same density that was there already. The Metropolitan Council has already accepted the density standards. In the one - plan - that shows the six that violates the front yard setback ordinances. There are homes on the street already. He believes the city should not exceed the density that is currently in .place with the R -1 lots. Chairperson Fischer asked if anybody n the audience wanted to sp eak on Y p , this proposal. Ills. Shirley Ta.ugner at 1730 Agate Street N. Maplewood, addressed th g � e commission. She thinks it should remain five residential single-famil homes. Having more homes in there mean more cars coming and going onto Larpenteur Avenue. When Champp's restaurant has. holiday parties it is very busy and very difficult to get out onto Lar p enteur Avenue. She asked if the residents would have to pay for the sewer? She said the . pond in the back of that area is filled with tires, refrigerators, bikes, etc. from p eople throwing things in that pond for over forty years. It is going to be a .big job. Mr. Roberts said no, the city or the developer would be res p onsible for that. . p The city is not going to completely drain the pond but just put a pipe in the pond so if it gets to a certain level it will empty aut. Ms. Taugner asked staff if these townhomes will be rental or will eo le own p p them? Mr. Roberts said that has not been decided yet. This is just a preliminary meeting. Ms. Taugner said I guess ou don't know too much at this point then. Y p Ms. Barb Bettinger at 1714 Agate Street N. Map lewood, addressed the commission. She asked with the 11 proposed housing units, how tall are they going to be and how many levels are. the going to be? Y9 g Mr.. Roberts said at this point the city does not have any design details yet. It could be designed in a number of different ways. This is simply to determine the number of units to have on the property. Ms. Bettinger said she would like to keep he neighborhood as single-family p 9 g Y housing. She doesn't want the traffic to increase anymore on Larpenteur Avenue. There is also a bus stop on Larpenteur Avenue, which adds to traffic. she asked if it would be low rent or subsidized housing? g 17 Mr. Roberts said based on the amount of mone the cit has invested in this project from bu these homes it would not support low-inco housin None of this has been determined y et though. Comm issione'r Pearson asked staff if the sewer problems' 'have been corrected or will it be a continuin problem? Mr. Cavett said. the sewer problem was a' problem in the main itself. When this g ets proposed the cit will brin in a private sewer, main off of Adolphus will completel eliminate the sewer problem'. The previous homes sat so low below the road. When this is redeveloped and re- this area would be raised q uite, a lot hi then the homes that were located there.. Commissioner Rossbach moved to adopt the zonin map chan resolution on pa 13 of the. staff report. This resolutiop chan the zonin map for five cit properties (189, 2091* 211 and 215 Larpentedr Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street). from sin dwellin residential (R-1) to multiple dwellin residential. (R-3 The cit is makin this chan because: a. The proposed chan is consistent with. the spirit, purpose, and intent of the zonin code. b. The proposed chan will not substantiall injure or detract from th e* use of nei propert or from- the character of - the nei and that the use of the propert adjacent to the area included in the proposed chan or plan is ade safe g uarded. c. The proposed chan will serve the best interests and .conveniences of the communit where applicable, and the public welfare. do T proposed chan 'would have 'no ne effect upon . the lo ' efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police. an d'fire' protection and schools. ..Commissioner . Rossbach moved to ado pt the land use p - resolution on page . 14 of the sta Ian change staff report. This resolution chan the comprehensive land use plan map for five cit properties (189, 209 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Stree from sin dwellin residential (R-1) to medium. multiple-dwellin residential (R-3M ). The cit is makin this chan because: a. The site serves well as a transition between the doubt e-dwellin propert to the west and the commercial propert to the east. 18 b. The site meets the city's policies for medium multiple-dwelling p g residential uses since it: 1) Includes a variety of housing types for all types of residents. 2) Supports innovative subdivision and housing design. n. g C. The site meets the city's goals for medium multiple-dwelling residential uses since it: 1) . Provides for orderly development. 2) Protects and strengthens neighborhoods. g g 3) Preserves significant' natural features where practical.. 4) Minimizes the land planned for streets. 5) Minimizes conflicts between land uses. 6) Provides a wide variety of housin g types. 7) Integrates developments with open space areas, community facilities and significant natural features. Commissioner Rossbach made a motion to allow no more than 8 units on the property for this proposal. Also that the .city should be held to the .same standards that the city requires other developers to be held to. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes — Monahan- J,unek, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippler Nays — Fischer, Mueller Chairperson Fischer and Commissioner Mueller, both voted nay due to the motion's condition of only allowing 8 units on the five -city owned properties. Chairperson Fischer and Commissioner Mueller both supported staff's recommendation for a total of 11 units. The motion passed 19 Attachment 9 DRAFT -_ MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWO OD HORSING AND REDEVE 1830 LOPMENT AUTHORITY CO LINTY ROAD B EAST, MARL EW04D, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, MARCH 18 2003 7 :00 P.M. CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM A VII. NEW BUSINESS a• Maplewood Larpenteur Avenue Redevelopment Plan (Larpenteur Avenue- and Mr. Roberts ' said the di a - . City cquired five single-family h g Y ousel located on the northw e and Adolphus Street with the cit corner of Larpenteur Avenue originally ty s Housing Replacement Progra 9 y purchased three of these house 9 m funds. The city Ori 2001. The s after they were flooded dune a • two adjacent older houses which 9 rainstorm in April • , hich were not flooded, were purchased order to combine all five ro erti p chased by the city last ear in p p es to create a more com rehen Y p slue land use plan. Mr. Roberts said the 'ci ty is now proposing to rezone and • the five ci -own • change the comprehensive lan - #y ed properties (189, 209 d use plan for , 211 and 215 Lar en The city is ro asin t p teurAvenue and 1701 Adolphus S p p g his change to accommodate the . Street). the future. � The a development of up to '11 town ho ' development of the town house use units in e units w require a separate review considered a a • t this time. and is not being Mr. Roberts said the ci 's • #y I pan is to get a higher dense • this land. Ther g density to the the ci ty ha • e are two proposals. Pro , Y tY has invested in Proposal One is dou ble-dwelling residers ' zoning district, the permitted uses ' g r esident ial: Within the (R . 0 2 ) include sin le and d 's comp rehensive g double dwelling units (no mul #iTunit to tY prehensive Ian does no � townhouses). The cit y's # define the maximum densi a1 • _ ty lowed .within the (R-2) ty is limited b the allo zonin district. Wherefore, the density allowable lot size and lot width as defin ' s zoning code. ed in the c Mr. Roberts said the second proposal is for Medium Multiple-Dwelling • er .Residential. 1Nithin the (R-3) p _ mitted uses include multi le dwe .the ci s comp r p Rings (including zoning district, the multi -unit. towno ' tY p ehensive plan the maximum huses). Within ximum density allowed within the R -3 M I • acre. If the five city -owned properties ( )and use is six units er p perties were rezoned to R -3 M a p could be constructed ( ), maxirraum Of 11 townhou ' (1.84 acres times six units eq se units q all 11.04 units }. The (R -'3 ) zonin ' than the (R zonin - g district is also less restrictive g d istrict - with n o minimum lot size or lot width. On Februar 2p r ry 03, the planning commission r . single - dwellin resid . ecommended approval of the zonin chars g ential (R -1) #o multiple-dwelling r (R-3) g ge from from sin. le- dwells (R-1) g esidential and the land use g ng residential to mediu _ plan change m multiple dwellin re sident i al commission also made a mot ion g esidential R -3(M). The Tannin Lion #O allow no more than 8 units. planning that the city be held to the on the property for this Proposal and same development and desig stan dards - p . g ndards required. by private developers. Mr. Roberts said staff has drawn wn two plans in the staff report.. f • - p first plan is for six units zoned (R-2) 11 units zoned R -3 M and the second plan is for . Commissioner Pear • Pearson asked staff if the plan for the six u plan? nits zoned R -2 would fit under the R- 3 (M) 20 Housing and Redevelopment Authority -2- minutes of 03 -18 -03 Mr. Roberts said after checking in the Comprehensive Plan, yes, it would work. Commissioner Pearson said when you read. the neighbor's comments they all want to keep single- family-homes in this area. Mr. Roberts said staff is trying to find out what the commission feels is the best fit for the area, either the six units or the 11 units. Commissioner Pearson liked the (R -2) plan with six units. He said he would be comfortable with the (R -3), plan as well but no more then 9 units. He feels the eleven units shown .on the plan are too high. He feels that if you keep the density down, then the number of residents and_ vehicles are lower. Then . you're able to have less cars and. less parking problems. He also likes the six -unit plan because it .exits off the side street instead of onto Larpenteur Avenue. He said exiting onto Larpenteur Avenue was a big concern of the neighborhood residents as. well. Commissioner O'Brien liked the (R -3) plan with eleven units to make the most use of the land and for the city to recover the most money for the land purchased. He said. you could go under the eleven units, but the developer can't go -over the eleven units. He said there are some good designs out there. There. could be tuck under garages and maybe even have a service .road along Larpenteur Avenue so the back yards could face the pond area. Commissioner Fischer liked the (R -3) plan with eleven units also. She said it would be a good fit between commercial properties and the pond and open - space in the back yard. Having more units on the site is a. way to recover more money the city has invested in the property. Money recovered in this project means more money that could be reinvested in more housing in the city for another area. Mr. Roberts said that is a legitimate concern for the HRA to continue the housing reinvestment program. Commissioner O'Brien moved to adopt the zoning map change resolution on page 13 of the staff report. This resolution changes the zoning map- for five city -owned properties (189, 209 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street) from single dwelling residential (R-1).to. multiple dwelling residential (.R -3). The city is making this change because: a. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent if the zoning code of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. b. The proposed change will serve the best.interests and conveniences of the community,. where applicable, and the public welfare. c. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of. public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Commissioner O'Brien moved to adopt the Land use plan change resolution on page 14 of the staff report. This resolution changes the comprehensive land use plan map for five city -owned properties (189, 209, 211 and 215 Larpenteur Avenue and 1701 Adolphus Street) from single 21. Housing and Redevelopment Authority. -3- Minutes of 03 -18 -03 dwelling residential (R -1) to medium multiple - dwelling residential (R -3M). The city is making this change because: a. The site serves well as a transition between the doable- dwelling property to the west and the commercial property to the east. b. The site meets the city's policies for medium multiple- dwelling residential uses since it: (1) Includes a variety of housing types for all types or residents. (2). Supports innovative subdivision and housing design. c. The site meets the city's goats for medium multiple- dwelling residential uses since it: (1) Provides for orderly .development. , (2) Protects and strengthens neighborhoods. (3) Preserves significant natural features where practical. (4) Minimizes the land planned for streets. (5). Minimizes conflicts between land uses. (6) Provides a wide variety . of housing types. (7) rates en P Integrates developments with o space areas, community facilities and g p p significant natural features. Commissioner. Fischer seconded. Ayes —Fischer, O'Brien Nay — Pearson Commissioner Pearson said he voted nay because he feels the density is too high for the area. He feels the city should accommodate the of the residents who want the. use to .,remarin q single- family instead of accommodating the developers. Commissioner O'Brien said he voted aye because the amount of money the city has put into this parcel of land the city needs to recover their investment by putting the most units on the property as tY ossible. The city will be taking care of a flooding problem that occurred there and this would p g increase the housing stock for people wanting to live closer to St. Paul. He thinks. there can be design and architectural elements put into this project to make this a desirable location. The motion carried. This item goes to the city council on March 31, 2003. Commissioner. Joe O'Brien will be the HRA representative ,at the city council meeting, March 31, 2003. 22 • i ' te �•��� � � � \�' . • \'1�,. `-tom � � v ♦ \' / � ti \• v " } • I � , ' i icy U i • �. Z 1 LID T"00- LT It I C7 l `J `.,,,/ v 3 ' co r _ - T V{ t -- -• V s � WI _ /� `��. -: \•."0...'r ......�.. •.`t•' 1 . .'. \. \.,•.`�`.;\ ' ;OL M h p �• + r 1 i .� _ } rR , O _ x• i Q �..�r ,_ �� An- ff ,, CD .. O •`r L LO O Qo t t • i ' te �•��� � � � \�' . • \'1�,. `-tom � � v ♦ \' / � ti \• v " } • I � , ' i icy U i • �. Z 1 LID T"00- LT CL CL 1 1 `,/ %VMU l V _ 1 Ir �� '• � � � 118 -mss -' T °° ©0lj 30"d0,: `V I LA let "Ile ( L .6 r ` w n cn o f �, 24 N 0 0 , n N l �:�' `. � o r te' = -, ! " • r (( 7 CP \ ZN t 1 N ` _ mow ))) � � � o r•1JIS :. AGENDA ITEM 9��? AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Richard Fursman, City Manager Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Action by Council Date JLJr,do1 se, t.•S. SUBJECT: Legacy Village at Maplewood (Hajicek Property), City Project O �Rjp5ted Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) 7:15 PM - Public Hearing Resolution Approving Distribution of a Final Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review Document and Mitigation Plan For Legacy Village DATE: March 25, 2003 Introduction On November 25, 2002, the city council authorized the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) of the Hijacek property in north Maplewood for a mixed land -use development proposed on the site. A development of the size proposed exceeds the threshold for environmental review, which required that the city council designate a process for an environmental review process. The developer of the property is the Hartford Group. Hartford hired SRF to prepare the AUAR environmental study and have a draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) prepared for the development scenario. The AUAR document has been circulated for comments and comments. The final action on the AUAR is adoption of the Mitigation Plan and approval to distribute the final plan for comment. A public hearing is called to allow final comments by impacted individuals. Background The Hartford Group has proposed development of the Hijacek site in north Maplewood with a mixture of single- family, senior housing, high- density residential property, retail property, medical office, and corporate office property. The proposed mixed -use development is consistent with the goals of the comprehensive plan for this area of the city. The attached drawing shows a draft concept for the proposed development. The AUAR is an extensive review of the environmental impacts of the proposed development. The following page includes a number of the specific impacts identified. The AUAR provides a mitigation plan that the council, acting as the Regulatory Governmental Unit �r p (RGU), will be required to adopt. The EQB guidelines for an AUAR state: It must be understood that the mitigation plan in the final document takes on the nature of a commitment by the RGU (City Council) to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects. It is more than just a list of ways to reduce impacts — it must include information about how the mitigation will be applied and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the AUAR may not be adequate and /or specific projects may lose their exemption from individual review." The council consideration of the proposed resolution is making a major commitment that the mitigation identified will occur, either as a requirement by the developer through the development contract, by a commitment to a public improvement, or involvement of other agencies, if appropriate. This includes the extension of County Road D, west of Hazelwood, which will be shared by the city and the developer in terms to be. established in the development agreement. While the actual final alignment of County Road D is not set by the adoption of the resolution, the city council is stating their commitment to construct the County Road D extension as well as the other mitigation improvements such as water main improvements, wetland mitigation, and the noise abatement requirements, which are all listed in the attached final AUAR. t. City Concil Agenda Report k AUAR For Legacy Village At Maplewood March 25, 2003 Page Two AUAR Summary Development scenario includes 318 units of multi - family town homes; 244 units of multi - family row houses; 88 units of multi- family residential; 200 units of senior housing; 7.3 acres of retail / restaurant; 9.8 acres of commercial /office; 3.1 acres of medical office; and 9.8 acres of green / public space. Proposed construction of the development is assumed to begin during spring of g p 9 2003 and anticipated completion is 2006. Approval of the AUAR establishes these as a maximum development scenario and does not suggest an approved land use scenario. The traffic analysis indicates that the extension of County Road D west from Hazelwood Street must be installed for roadway impacts from the development to be mitigated. An extension of Kennard Street north from Beam is also required. Future improvements to White Bear Avenue, as recommended in the Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study, will be needed to mitigate area traffic growth and to solve the long- standing Mall area traffic. problems. Improvements are also suggested at the TH 61 and 1 -694 intersection. The White Bear Avenue and TH 61 improvements are not a required mitigation listed within the AUAR because traffic growth was determined to have a much greater impact on traffic volumes than traffic from the proposed development. Both improvements will continue to be a high priority for the city due to the area growth related traffic impacts and importance to the region. • Sanitary sewer capacity is adequate in local sewers; however, the site is proposed to generate more flow than allocated by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) in the 2000 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. An error was discovered in the calculations of the Comprehensive Plan and a commitment to correct the plan is required. .Water supply is adequate if a 12 -inch water main is extended from TH 61 along the existing County Road D alignment as recommended by the TH 61 /County Road D (Hilicrest Animal Hospital) Water Study in 2002. • A comprehensive storm water plan is required and is underway as part of the development process. The development is required to limit post - development runoff to pre - development levels using infiltration and storm ponds on -site. No new storm water infrastructure is anticipated off -site due to development related runoff increases. • Significant tree removal is anticipated due to project development and grading. The developer has proposed that existing trees be "...evaluated by an urban forester to identify important specimens that should be preserved and /or existing trees that could be relocated within the development using a tree spade." This mitigation strategy will be a requirement of the development agreement. • The DNR has noted that areas of the development have habitat similar to that preferred by the Blanding's turtle, a species listed as threatened in Minnesota, but no Blanding's turtles have been observed on the site. The DNR notes that the project site is not designated as an area of - statewide importance for Blanding's turtle and no impact is anticipated. City �ncil Agenda ty ou g Report AUAR For Legacy Village At Maplewood March 25, 2003 Page Three Wetland impact is anticipated on the site. A total of six wetlands were identified during the site review. Included in the AUAR document are maps that identify Wetlands A through F. Wetlands A and B are proposed to be filled and mitigated within the site. The drainage ditch connecting to Wetland C will be filled and mitigated. All mitigation will be proposed. on the project. The development is not proposed to impact the main basin of Wetland C, and is not proposed to impact Wetlands D, E or F, although the requirement to realign County Road D will likely impact Wetland D. That wetland impact is covered in the EAW prepared for the County Road D extension project. Wetland buffer requirements have been identified and are proposed to be implemented. Storm water will be required to be pre- treated before discharge to the wetlands • A study of the air quality in the area indicates that no problems are anticipated. • A study of the noise in the area indicates that the northern -most portion of the site does not .currently meet state nighttime noise standards due to the 1 -694 freeway noise. The residential units will be required to be designed to minimize noise impacts by providing climate - controlled units, increasing wall insulation and by providing common areas within the building courtyards. The need for increased fire and police protection is identified within the AUAR. The fire and police departments have determined that the proposed development will likely require two police officers based upon 1.5 officers per 1000 people and fire has estimated a need for eight new firefighters /paramedics throughout the city, of which two may need to be dedicated to this development. Additional study of financial commitment of the development's related tax base toward police and fire protection will occur as part of the PUD and Tax Abatement hearings. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving distribution of a Final Alternative Urban Area -Wide Review Document and Mitigation Plan for Legacy Village, City Project 02 -18. RCA jw Attachments: Preliminary Development Concept Plan Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (Separate Attachment) Area Roadway Improvement Concept (Separate Attachment) Project Schedule Resolution 0 0 v N .y.� z t LU i�1 U ` \ � Q •N L \ \\ N •ice+ � c� � f • /���_ t 1 ~ � t 0 M � O � O i t i f 1 � N � w V C C �1 �1 r� d • r-�t c�r1 U o bA� 4J HARTFORD SITE PROPOSAL W/ COUNTY ROAD D EXTENSION PROJECT TIME LINE PLAN March 25, 2003 Critical Items /Tasks Due Date Requirements Alignment Study Task Force 09/19/02 Adopts Alignment 4B Draft AUAR to City staff 11/26/02 21 days for review Planning Commission — Rvw of Align Study 12/03/02 Recommends Option City Council Auth Prep of AUAR 12/09/02 Study Area Defined Final Roadway Align Study to Council 12/09/02 Draft Rpt by 11 /01 Roadway Align Public Hearing @ Council 12/09/02 ROW Map Authorize AUAR to Council 12/23/02 Sent for Pub Review AUAR Notice Published in EQB Monitor 01/06/03 30 days for review County Rd D EAW Approve Publish 01/27/03, City Council Action County Rd D EAW Publish in EQB 02/03/03 30 days for review AUAR Comment Period Ends 02/06/03 Tax Abatement Info to Council 02/10/03 Developer & Pub Needs $$ AUAR Responses Prepared 2/10 to 3/03 21 days Hartford Plans submitted for Review 03/03/03 60 day Review Clock Starts Planning Comm — Rvw AUAR and EAW 03/03/03 No Public Comment EAW Comment Period Ends 03/05/03 Council Calls Hearing on AUAR and EAW 03/10/03 No testimony received City Council Review of Prel Development Plan 03/10/03 Planning Commission Prel Development Rvw 03/17/03 City Council — Pub Hearing — AUAR & EAW 03/31/03 Public testimony welcome 21 days: objections to action City Council - `Discuss -Cty Rd D Align Options 04/14/03 Public Comment Welcome Planning Commission — Review ROW Map for County Road D Alignment 04/21/03 Public Comment Welcome Council adopts Final Legacy Village AUAR w/Mitigation Plan 04/28/03 Approves Project to Next Phase City Council Approves Final Alignment for County Road D — Approves ROW Map And Authorizes Prep of Prel Report 04/28/03 Public Comment Welcome Planning Commission Reviews Prel Plat, Land Use Plan Amend, PUD Zone Change, And Transportation Plan Amend 05/05/03 Public Comment Welcome City Council holds Public Hearing Approves preliminary plat, land use plan change and PUD Rezoning and holds Tax Abatement Public Hearing 05/12/03 Public Hearing City Council receives Prel Report on Cty Rd D 05/12/03 No Public Testimony Design Rvw Committee Reviews Bldg Design Details 05/20/03 Details of Building Appearance City Council approves final bldg. Plans 05/27/03 Final Legacy Village Approval City Council holds Public Hearing on Cty Rd D 05/27/03 Public Testimony Welcome CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. XX -XX A RESOLUTION APPROVING DISTRIBUTION OF A FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREA -WIDE REVIEW DOCUMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN FOR LEGACY VILLAGE WHEREAS, on December 12, 2002, the City Council approved resolution #XX -XX, authorizing that an Alternative Urban Areawide Review ( "AUAR ") be initiated and completed for Legacy Village at Maplewood; and WHEREAS, on January 6, 2003, the City of Maplewood prepared and distributed a draft AUAR environmental analysis document and, draft Mitigation Plan on the Legacy Village at Maplewood in accordance with Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program procedures; and WHEREAS, the 30 -day public review and comment period on the draft AUAR document and draft Mitigation Plan ended on February 5, 2003; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood revised the draft AUAR document and Mitigation Plan based on comments received during the public review comment period; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds the revised AUAR environmental analysis document to be complete, including a plan for mitigation specifying the measures that will be imposed upon further development within the study area in order to avoid or mitigate potential environmental impacts; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, that the final AUAR environmental analysis document and mitigation plan for Legacy Village at Maplewood be distributed in accordance with Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Environmental Review Program procedures. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD THIS 31st DAY OF March 2003. MAYOR CITY MANAGER AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT _ Action by Council TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: SUBJECT: D ate �. Charles Ah-1, Director of Public Works /City Engineer V �.. . County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to TH 61) —City Project 02 -07 ec ted County Road D Extension (West of TH 61) —City Project 02 -08 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 7:15 pm Public Hearing and Resolution Receiving Comments and Responses on EAW and Finding of No Significant Impact DATE: March 25, 2003 Introduction The City Council has directed the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the County Road D realignment project between Hazelwood and TH 61 and the realignment of County Road D west of TH 61. The EAW was completed and circulated for comment. The comments have been reviewed and responses prepared. Presentation of the findings will be made along with a recommendation that there is no significant impact from the proposed project. This is a public hearing to allow impacted property owners an opportunity to comment on the findings. Background On December 9, 2002, the city council approved a resolution to roceed with a project to p p j realign County Road D from Hazelwood Street to TH 61 at the Venbur Tire intersection and then realign ealign County Road D west of TH 61 through the vacant property to the existing alignment on the hrid a Court development. - g g east side of the Hi g g e opment. The length of this new roadway met the threshold for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The EAW has been re ared b the consult p p y ant for the project, URS, Inc. The process required that the document be routed to the various agencies and be provided for public comment. The. EAW identifies potential for environmental impacts. Specific impacts are to wetlands, ,where 2.43 acres : will be impacted but are proposed to be replaced by 4.86 acres of wetlands to be created b portion of the golf course and b expanding y restoring a p g y p g wetlands at the County Road D and intersection. ntersection. A major grading operation will be required at the Burlington Northern g e n Railroad crossing, which will impact area slopes. Appropriate construction controls should mitigate this impact. pact. Blandings turtle and White Wild Indigo are threatened species within the area however the DN R has concluded that the project likely will have no impact. Sediment ponds are proposed osed to upgrade p p pg de the area storm water flows, which are currently untreated. Standards for the 1.44 acres of storm onds to be created include providing or 60 percent phosphorus p g p p phorus and 90 percent total suspend solid removal for runoff flows generated within the project area. A 30 -day comment period expired on March 5, 2003. The EAW was osted on the city's we p y bsite and was available for inspection at City Hall and at the local library. Attached is a s and comments/responses mma of the findings onses received from ' � g p individuals and agencies. If the City Council approves the finding of no significant impact, the findings of the EAW will be incorporated into the r • • p County Road D improvement ovement project. No additional environmental study is recommended. Should the City ouncil feel additional st �' � identified, could s study is warranted, they could specify items for study, or if significant impacts are identifi specify preparation of an p p fy p p Environmental Impact Study (EIS). An EIS is an alternatives study that thoroughly reviews all impacts and mitigation. An EIS for this ro'ect would likely take tw pj y o years to complete and cost in excess of $300,000. Planning Commission Agenda Report February 26, 2003 County Road D Realignment EAW Page Two Process Consideration of the alignment is part of a process to implement the findings of the Mall Traffic Study. The City of Maplewood has established a goal of opening the County Road D extension project for traffic by November 2004. The following process is provided for consideration: • Alignment Study Task Force Report September 9, 2002 • Planning Commission Review of Alignment Study December 3, 2002 • Council Public Hearing on Alignment Study December 9, 2002 • Council Authorizes Preparation of AUAR for Legacy Village December 9, 2002 • Council Authorizes Distribution of Draft AUAR for Comment December 23, 2002 • Council Authorizes Preparation of EAW on Cty Rd D Alignment January 27, 2003 • Planning Commission Review of EAW and AUAR March 3, 2003 • EAW Approved for New Roadway in coordination with AUAR March 31, 2003 • County Road D Alignment Options Reviewed with Council April 14, 2003 • Right of Way Map Reviewed with Planning Commission April 21, 2003 • County Road D Alignment Selected ,Feasibility Study ordered o And Right of Way Map Approved by City Council April 28, 2003 • Council Calls Public Hearing on Improvements to County Road D May 12, 2003 • Public Hearing on County Road D Project May 27, 2003 • Right of Way Acquisition /Plan Preparation June — Sept. 2003 • Assessment Hearing /Plan Approval September 22, 2003 • Construction Award (Hazelwood to TH 61) October 27, 2003 • Begin Construction (Hazelwood to TH 61) November 2003 • Complete Construction (Hazelwood to TH 61) November 2004 • Assessment Hearing /Plan Approval (west of TH 61) September 2003 • Construction Award (west of TH 61) February 2004 • Begin Construction (west of TH 61) April 2004 • Complete Construction (west of TH 61) September 2004 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution receiving the Findings of Fact for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) on the County Road D Realignment Project (City Projects 02 -07 and 02 -08) and approving the Finding of No Significant Impact for the projects. RCA jW Attachments: County Road D Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Findings of Fact Resolution Project Maps County Road D Realignment Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet Finding of Fact Regarding Decision on Need for an Environmental Impact Statement March 31, 2003 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Maplewood proposes to realign approximately one mile of CR D between Hazelwood Avenue to just west of TH 61 (Figure 3). The Project includes a 4 7 4ane roadway section with dedicated turn lanes at major intersections east of TH 61, and a 2 -lane roadway section west of TH 61. Both sections would also include an 8 -foot trail along the.south side of the new roadway, which is part of the Lake Links Network Master Plan known as the Lake Links Trail. A new .intersection of CR D and TH 61 would be relocated approximately 900 feet south of the existing intersection, and will provide full access with a signalized intersection. The existin g intersection currently has right -in, right -out and a left turn from northbound TH 61 to west CR D. All other turning movements are not allowed. The left turn access will be closed and a median constructed in the center of TH 61. All utility services are sufficient to support the proposed Project. Water, sanitary and storm sewers will be built beneath the roadway and connected to existing systems. Three storm water ponds and one mechanical device will be implemented to accommodate additional runoff caused by the Project. The ponds may also serve as partial. mitigation for the 2.43 acres of existing wetland that will be impacted by the Project. The proposed alignment crosses rail owned by the Burlington Northern . Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad and leased by Minnesota Commercial Railroad. This Project will cut out a portion of the railroad embankment to cross at- grade. At some point in the future a pedestrian bridge will likely be constructed across the new roadway following the rail corridor. The sole propose of the remaining portion of the rail corridor north of Beam Avenue is to serve the Xcel Energy substation located adjacent to the west side of the track. The track is used in the event a large transformer needs to be replaced, which has only been necessary twice in the past 30 years. It is presumed that transformer hauling could be accomplished on local_ roads under permit. If so, the realignment of CR D could be carried out without any realignment of the rail spur to the Xcel substation. Both Ramsey County Parks and Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA) are interested in the potential abandonment of the rail corridor north of Beam Avenue in the Project area. Currently, the Bruce Vento Trail extends from St. Paul to Beam Avenue in Maplewood along abandoned rail bed. It connects with the State Gateway Trail at Frost Avenue in County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page I Maplewood, south of the Project area. The Gateway Trail begins in St. Paul and travels approximately 18 miles northeast to the endpoint five miles north of Stillwater. There is interest in extending the Bruce Vento Trail through the proposed Project area to as far north as VThite Bear Lake. The trail would go over the proposed realignment of CR D. Ramsey County is Y tY interested in owning the remaining rail corridor to make this extension, which would connect to the State Gateway Trail and the proposed Lake Links Trail as art of the regional trails stern. P � Y The RCRRA owns the abandoned rail corridor south of Beam Avenue and plans to purchase the . p p remaining rail right -of -way north of Beam Avenue when it is eventually abandoned. They would use the corridor for future public transit purposes alon g with the regional trail. g Construction of the proposed realignment would occur in phases. Most likely the eastern section (Hazelwood Avenue to TH 61) will be built first. It is anticipated that construction of the eastern section would be completed by the end of 2004. Construction of the western section would be timed in accordance with development being planned for adjacent parcels. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS The City of Maplewood is the project proposer for the CR D Realignment Project and has made application for various permits and approvals related to the Project. The Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for the Project is also the City of Maplewood. The County Road D Realignment Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed at the discretion of the City of Maplewood. The length of the Project met thresholds that require mandatory preparation of an EAW under Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, subpart 22A. The EAW was submitted to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on January 27, 2003. The EAW Notice of Availability was published in the Minnesota EQB Monitor on February 3, 2003. Copies of the EAW were mailed to all of the agencies and organizations on the EQB official EAW distribution list, the local libraries, as well as representatives of other interested agencies. On February 4, 2003, information on the Project was provided in a press release to the Maplewood Review newspaper along with other required information under Minnesota Rule 4410.1500 Subp. B. The 30 -day review and comment period ended on March -5, 2003. CORRECTIONS, CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO THE EAW A number of minor edits should be noted in the EAW in the following locations: Page 2 — It should be clarified that the Lake Links Trail is not currently identified as a regional trail, but will connect to regional trails in the area. Page 19, Construction Noise — Daylight working hours should read 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, consistent with City Ordinance. Figure 5 — Blue lines on this figure should be identified as County Ditch, not streams. County Road D Realignment Project. 03125103 Finding of Fact - Page 2 COMMENTS ON THE EAW During the EAW comment period, letters of comment were received from the following agencies, organizations, and individuals: A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources B. Minnesota Department of Transportation C. Metropolitan Council D. Minnesota Historical Society — State Historic Preservation Office E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District F. Gerald and Linda Peterson G. George and Kathy Supan H. Steve Martinson I. Scott Milton J. Joseph Wegner K. Cindy Kranz All comment letters received are included in Attachment 1. The substantive comments stated in each letter are outlined below along with a corresponding response. Verbal comments on the EAW were received from the Maplewood City Council Meeting on January 27, 2003 and the Maplewood Planning Commission meeting held on March 3 2003. These comments and the responses given are documented in items L and M below. Note: "The City" in each of the following responses refers to the City of Maplewood. A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment Al: The Division of Trails and Waterways expressed appreciation for attention paid to the local trails network, with the Lake Links Trail segment included as part of the road project and consideration of agrade- separated crossing for the future expansion of the BNBruce Vento Regional Trail. Ramsey County is the lead contact for both trail projects. Please contact Ramsey County's Greg Mack for additional consultation. Response Al: The City has been and will continue to coordinate with Burlington Northern and Ramsey County (Greg Mack) on the abandonment of the rail corridor for the Bruce Vento Trail. Final design will reflect accommodation for future construction of a pedestrian bridge over the roadway. B. Minnesota Department of Transportation Comment B1: The stopping sight distance from the south maybe a concern. It maybe slightly limited by the existing crest vertical curve on TH 61. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 3 Response B1: Even assuming the worst case, the sight triangle does not cross the existing building. There may be restrictions of where the arkin may occur on p g Y the Venberg Tire parcel to ensure stopping sight distance. This limitation if necessary, will be finalized during the final design process of the roadway. Comment B2: A&VDOT has access control along TH 61 in the location of the new CR D alignment. The new road will need a new access openin g and the old access will need to be closed with access control when the project is further developed. Response B2: The City will work with Mn/DOT to accommodate the necessary access control changes. Comment B3: Mn/DOT permits will be required for the project. Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right -of -way requires a permit. Project plans will need to be submitted when the project is further along. A signal justification report (SJR) will be required for the new signal at Beam Avenue. Response B3: Mn/DOT permits /approvals, including plan review, the ri way permit, and Signal Justification report, are listed in Table 1 of the EAW document as permits required for the project. The City will submit appropriate ro riate documents during the final design phase of the Project. Comment B4: This project should be phased such that the closure of "old" CR D median opening and right-in/right-out on the west side of TH 61) takes place in advance of or simultaneously to the relocation of CR D. Reasons for this include: • the existing 3 /4 intersection at CR D and TH 61 does not meet Mn/DOT access management guidelines. • The project will result in an increase in traffic volume at the I -694 interchange • There is currently a higher than expected number of rear end collisions involving right turning vehicles at the eastbound I -694 ramp to SB TH 61 r • In anticipation of the traffic volume increase from this project and the closure of CR D west of TH 61, Mn/DOT is planning to install a southbound acceleration lane on TH 61 for vehicles turning right off of the eastbound I- 694 ramp. This installation cannot take place without the closure of CR D west of TH 61. Response B4: The City will work with Mn/DOT to accommodate any closures necessary. Comment B5: The right - in/right -out intersection at CR D on the east side of TH 61 does not meet Mn/DOT access management guidelines. This is the only public street serving the properties to the east of TH 61, so a right- inhight -out will be allowed. However, if the "old" connection of CR D through to White Bear is ever restored, we will investigate the closure of this access due to the proximity to the I -694 ramps. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 4 Response B5: The City will continue to work with Mn/DOT on access management at the existing CR D intersection with TH 61. C. Metropolitan Council Comment C1: Given the number and extent of existing and proposed mitigation wetlands on p p g the site, and the understanding that Blanding's Turtles are known to travel u p to one mile from wetland feeding areas to upland nesting areas, it is ite possible that q they may traverse portions of this proposed roadway. Council staff recommends considering the utilization of surmountable curbing for the ro osed roadwa y reconstruction project, in lieu of the designs presented in Figure 4. Response Cl: Ditches or curbs that are negotiable to turtles are also a recommendation of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. As part of final design, the City will consider the most appropriate curb treatment. The City may also consider building a portion of the road as a rural section (no curb and gutter) in response to poor soil conditions. Comment C2: The EAW states that the ro osed eight-foot trail ' p p g on the south side of a realigned CR D would be known as the Lake Links Regional Trail. This trail is actually proposed to be a local trail. It was studied as a part of the Lake Links Trail Network Master Plan. The EAW describes the trail as interim. It is understood that trails are a part of the transportation infrastructure and that it will continue to be accommodated in some manner, if and when the corridor is used for additional transportation uses. Response to C2: The EAW identified the Lake Links Trail as a regional trail. It was intended to be described that the Lake Links Trail, as part of the Network Master Plan, would provide local access to regional trail systems in the area. This section of the Lake Links Trail will be permanently maintained b the City Y for pedestrian use. The interim trail use discussed in the EAW was in reference to the Bruce Vento Trail. It should be correctly stated that the Bruce Vento Trail will accommodate trail /pedestrian uses as well as otential p future transit uses. Comment C3: As the proposed project map depicts an intersection of the future segment of the B � � Bruce Vento Trail and CR D, the City and the County need to work together to ensure e the State Regional Parks System is appropriately accommodated. Response to C3: The City has been coordinating with Burlington Northern and Ramsey County (Greg Mack) on the conversion of the rail corridor to an extension of the Bruce Vento 'Trail. The final CR D design will accommodate for future construction of a pedestrian bridge over the roadway. Gounty Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 5 D. Minnesota Historical Society - State Historical Preservation office Comment D1: The review submittal includes a chart of fourteen inventoried properties, along with a statement that they are outside the area of direct impact. It is not clear whether they lie within the APE [Area of Potential Effect] as far as indirect impacts are concerned. If they do, further evaluation may be needed. Response Dl: The need for this additional cultural resource work is triggered by the federal permit required for wetlands in the Project area. The additional evaluation required will be prepared during the permit process. The City will coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to define the APE and potential indirect impacts _after the alignment has been refined. Comment D2: The section of the Northern Pacific Railroad in the area is cited as having a high degree of integrity. The effects of the project on this property need to be assessed. Response D2: As described above in Response D1, this additional evaluation is triggered by the federal permit. The City will coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to determine the study area for the assessment of potential rail corridor impacts. E. U.S. Army Corps of EnLyineers, St. Paul District Comment E1: As you have indicated, the project would require a permit from the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Please submit the appropriate application package when the plans are sufficiently developed so our office can make a final determination on the need for a Corps permit. Any application should clearly address wetland impacts and alternative measures that have been considered to avoid and minimize those impacts. A discussion of wetland mitigation/replacement should also be included in the application. Response E1: As indicated in Table 1 of the EAW, a Section 404 permit application will be filed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. F. Gerald and Linda Peterson Comment F1: I would like to see the wetland mitigation area by the corner of Hazelwood and CR D to be smaller. Also what type of wetland? Looks more like a storm basin. Response Fl: At this time, the wetland mitigation plan is conceptual only. A more detailed plan will be developed as part of final design and the wetland permit application process. The replacement wetland would be of similar type to what is being impacted bythe project (Type 1 and 2). Comment F2: The end of Hazelwood shows storm drains in the road, Hazelwood's water runs off to the sides, it should not have anything to prevent that. I believe the wetland County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 6 mitigation area at the end of Hazelwood is higher than the road. Is the water to be pumped up or is there going to be a big hole? It is close to the home. Could be a possible hazard to the children. Keep it closer to where it is being moved from. Response F2: The regional storm water management plan being prepared for this area by the city includes the collection and treatment of runoff from Hazelwood, CR D and planned future development. The specific methods for collection and location of treatment ponds is being evaluated. Location and design of treatment facilities will incorporate safety considerations. As noted in response El, the wetland mitigation areas shown in the EAW are conceptual. Details of the location, size and grading plans will be provided in the required permit applications to be submitted once final designs are complete. It is expected that construction of wetland mitigation areas will be accomplished via excavation. No pumping of runoff is planned. Comment F3: I also did not see any information about pest control and smell due to the increased ponds and wetlands. Response F3: Proper management of natural areas should not increase the likelihood of mosquito or pest problems over those currently experienced by area residents. Comment F4: Hours of work should read. 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Saturday. Response F4: The hours of work should read 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM as stated. Article III of the Maplewood Zoning Code does state 7:OOPM to 7:OOAM Monday through Saturday, and all day Sunday, as the hours when g eneral prohibition of noise should occur. This also applies to construction activities. Sec. 19 -48b states: The city manager, or his or her designee, may waive this requirement where the activity would not cause a nuisance and where the proposed activity would not be within 350 feet of a residential use. The city manager's decision may be appealed to the city council. A waiver within 350 feet of a residential use must be approved by the city council. The property owners within 350 feet of the proposed activity shall be notified of the waiver request at least 10 days before the council meeting. A nuisance is described as ...any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety or welfare of any person or precludes their, enjoyment of property or affects their property's value County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 7 Construction activities associated with the CR D project would adhere to the hours outlined in the ordinance, and/or would follow the established process for any exceptions to the ordinance. G. George and Kathy Supan Comment G1.: The area identified as wetland mitigation east of the Hazelwood and CR D intersection should be moved to the north and east of the proposed area. There needs to be more distance between the homes and the wetland area. The land today does not support wetland in that area and it's hard to believe that wetlands should be created that close to residential property. Response G1: See Responses F1 and F2. Comment G2: I did not see anything about care for the ponds and wetland. Such as mosquito. control, smell and grasses in or around the wetland. With the recent spread of diseases carried by mosquitoes like the West Nile Disease a wetland area should not be placed near the current homes on Hazelwood Street. Who will control the mosquitoes and pests in and around the proposed ponds and wetland areas? If the realignment of CR D requires more ponds and wetland, treatment of them should also be required. Response G2: See Response F3. Comment G3: In the AUAR there were studies indicating that the noise levels were already high in the area south of CR D. The proposed residential buildings in the Legacy of Maplewood site will have special care given to windows and insulation to reduce the noise. The reali of CR D will bring the traffic closer to the residences on the east side of Hazelwood Street. What compensation will there be to the homeowners to reduce the noise level in their homes? Response G3: The AUAR does state that noise insulation would be installed in new units in the proposed development. The AUAR also states that existing noise from I -694 surpasses the potential noise from the development project. The insulation is not required and is being done at the discretion of the developer, in brand new homes. It is being done to offset the ambient noise that already exists in the area. There are no plans at this time to compensate existing homeowners as a result of the CR D project. Comment G4: The defined hours are from 7:OOAM to 10:00PM. I believe the AUAR had 7:OOAM to 7:OOPM, and is it not City Code to be 7:OOAM to 7:OOPM? Response G4: See Response F4. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 8 Comment G5: I would ask that the residents along the east side of Hazelwood Street be advised in writing of the time lines and meetings for the CR D reali project and EAW review. Response G5: The residents have been and currently are being notified of meetings. H. Steve Martinson Comment Hl: There needs to be a shoulder on CR D west of TH 61. There is a bus stop and considerable pedestrian traffic between TH 61 and Walter. An increase in traffic will cause safety issues if a shoulder is not added. There are mailboxes right along CR D west of TH 61 which is dangerous for mail carriers and residents as they get their mail. The mailboxes should be set back off the highway, or, adding a wider shoulder would help. Response HI: A closure of CR D at TH 61 will be reviewed with engineers from Ramsey County and Mn/DOT. Bus routes will also be rerouted and all safety issues reviewed and appropriately addressed. Comment H2: The intersection at Highridge Court and CR D is a blind intersection that will need to be addressed. Response H2: As part of the roadway realignment, the City would work with Ramsey- County- engineers to- ensure- safe --access-within- the area. - -- - - - - -- - - -- I. Scott Milton Comment I1: A stoplight at the intersection of TH 61 and CR D was previously looked at by the state highway department when the west area along TH 61 was proposed to be developed with an apartment complex. At that time the stoplight was not approved by the highway department because it would severely back up traffic along TH 61. Is this still a concern of the highway department or the city? Response I1: A signal was previously evaluated at the intersection of TH 61 and existing CR D. Existing CR D is too close to the signalized I -694 interchange, and making vehicles stop for a signal would cause severe backups. Previous analysis did not include a reali of CR D. As part of the traffic study for this Project, it was found that intersections along TH 61 would operate at a better Level of Service (LOS) with the new CR D intersection than without it. A signal at TH 61 and new CR D would not experience the same problems as the intersection of existing CR D. NhVDOT will be consulted throughout the process, including a Signal Justification Report. Comment I2: From experience on driving this route, traffic can and does back up from CR C to Beam going north and from I -694 to Beam going south during rush hour. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 9 Addition of an extra intersection will make for greater gridlock along this route, similar to what happens along White Bear Avenue. And this is without the added traffic from the proposed development west of Maplewood Mall. Response I2: As part of this project, a traffic model was run forTH 61. The project was designed based on the results of this model. As designed, the project would relieve the traffic volumes at the Beam Avenue /TH 61 intersection, including the current problem of southbound left turns onto Beam Avenue, by providing an alternate location for southbound traffic to turn left (at new CR D) to reach the Maplewood Mall and other destinations east of the Project area. The proposed CR D is located at an adequate distance between Beam Avenue and I -694 to minimize impacts. Comment I3: Would the implementation of this plan allow the area west of TH 61 to be developed with an apartment complex? The Kohlman neighborhood was strongly against this when it was previously brought before the Council. There is concern that this may allow the project to slip in without further review. Is the property west of TH 61 slated to have its zoning changed from commercial to high density residential as part of this realignment? Response I3: As part of the consideration of the final alignment, the Maplewood City Council may consider a land use change in the area west of TH 61. A land use study will be done as part of the final ali Any land use changes would require action to be taken at a public meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council, for which adjacent residents would be notified. J. Joseph WeLyner Comment J1: With the car dealership expanding and some of the traffic changes that have been made at/around the current CR D, the traffic and speed of traffic on Walter Street has increased significantly. Anything the new plan can do to decompress the traffic flow on the local side streets will be greatly appreciated. Response J1: While Walter Street is not part of the traffic model for this project, it is expected that the signalized connection of new CR D with TH 61 would divert some traffic from Walter Street. Comment J2: Any plans for CR D west of TH 61 should include an option/mandate for non - local traffic to access the "new D" and have access to south and northbound TH 61. If the proposed changes do not include creating a northbound TH 61 option off of CR D, I would heartily suggest this. With - the development of additional business on TH 61, no northbound TH 61 access from CR D. and further expansion of residential development on top of the hill behind Gulden's, our street [Walter Street], at times, is a safety issue. A practical diversion of CR D with access to north and southbound TH 61 will help diminish unnecessary traffic to our neighborhood. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 10 Response J2: At the intersection of existing CR D and TH 61, it is proposed that the median is closed and left -turn access is eliminated. The new intersection of CR D /TH 61 would be a full access intersection. New CR D would be part of the County State Aid system, therefore no restrictions are allowed. The road would be designed to accommodate all forms of traffic. Comment J3: If you are contemplating an additional traffic signal in the area of Gulden's, I would recommend observing the traffic flow on southbound TH 61 attempting to turn eastbound on Beam during the Christmas holidays. Response J3: See Response 12. Traffic modeling has shown that all traffic patterns will be improved. The City believes that traffic issues associated with the high number of turning movements directed toward the Maplewood Mall area during the holiday season will be improved with the realigned roadway and improvements at the Beam Avenue /TH 61 intersection. K. Cindy Kranz Comment Kl: I live on Highridge Court and had asked that the new road be located further east than you had proposed originally. I believe the City said "we could move the road further east." I am wondering if now that you are going to the next phase of study, the new study would in fact show the road to be further east than originally thought. After hearing the comments from the owner of the pet kennel, I think moving the proposed realignment east would also alleviate her concerns about accessibility to her place of business. Response Kl : The City will complete a land use study as part of efforts to refine the roadway alignment west of TH 61, and will consider options to move the roadway east. The current schedule indicates that the City Council will review changes to the ali at the City Council meeting on April 14, 2003, and has a final public hearing on the CR D plans on May 12, 2003. L. Maplewood City Council (verbal comments, January 27, 2003) Comment L1: Will wetland buffers be replaced as part of wetland mitigation? Response L1: The Maplewood City Ordinance states that any impacted wetland replaced at a 1:1 ratio, and should have a minimum average buffer width, depending on wetland classification. The Proj ect will comply with these requirements, and will provide buffer replacement in addition to the wetland mitigation that is required, where feasible. M. Maplewood Planning Commission (verbal comments, March 3, 2003) Comment M1: Don't the six known occurrences of Blanding's turtles trigger specific mitigation? County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 11 Response M1: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) identified six known occurrences of rare species in the project area, five of which were Blanding's turtles. The sixth occurrence was the White Wild Indigo, which the DNR has stated is not anticipated to be affected by the proposed project. The DNR searches within a one -mile radius of a site, and has stated that the project area is not within a high priority area for Blanding's Turtles, but that potential turtle habitat could be affected by construction activities. The DNR provided a list of recommended mitigation measures for the project, which are included as Attachment 2. The DNR directed that the first list of recommendations to prevent harm to turtles during construction work be considered for this project. This list will be followed as much as is feasible during project construction. Comment M2: Why would it be in the City's interest to reclassify Wetland A (location west of TH 61)? [to downgrade from a "Protect" classification] Response M2': The wetland has been degraded and silted in, and may no longer meet criteria for a protect classification. Classification information is derived from old maps and aerial photos and is not field- checked. Staff will go on -site to determine if the wetland actually meets its classification criteria. There is also a possibility that this wetland could be avoided or reduced through design refinements of the western portion of the roadway. It is important to have the appropriate and correct classification of the'wetland to ensure that proper mitigation is identified. Comment M3: In one place it says all runoff will be handled by ponds, and in another it references storm sewer capture. Response M3: See Response F2. Comment M4: Is it possible to begin conversations with Mn/DOT now about the interchange of TH 61/694? Response M4: Mn/DOT has been a part of the planning process, through coordination with the traffic study and ali study. This coordination will continue through this process and for other improvements in the area. FINDINGS OF FACT / DECISION ON NEED FOR EIS Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, Subp. 7, specifies the following criteria to be used in deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effect. • Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects. • Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 12 • The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority, and • The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EIS s . Based on the information contained in the EAW, comments received on the EAW, and responses to those comments and the criteria listed above, the City of Maplewood, as the RGU, makes the following determinations: 16 Type, extent and reversibility on impacts. The Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW and the Finding of Fact summarize the type and extent of impacts to the natural environment. Alternatives to avoid potential impacts on the natural environment were considered and were evaluated prior to the preparation of the EAW. The proposed project is compatible with surrounding development and is in compliance with local land use plans. The proposed improvement plans also will include design features to mitigate impacts to the environment, and where noted, the project proposer will work with the appropriate agencies to continue to address the environmental impacts. 2. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. As discussed in the EAW and Finding of Fact, the cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future development, to the extent that they can be identified, have been considered in the analysis prepared for the study. There were no comments received by regulatory agency staff requesting or identifying the need for an EIS. The EAW provides adequate information to make a determination on the level of environmental impact that will result from the proposed project, given what is known about related or anticipated future projects. 30 Extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. The City of Maplewood may issue permits to allow construction in compliance with the rules of the EAW and in conformance with the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act. The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with regulatory agencies and will be subject to the plan approval and permitting process. Mitigation will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. The permits and approvals required for this project include: County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 13 Table 1: Permits Required UNIT OF TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS GOVERNMENT U.S. Army Corps Section 404 Permit To be applied for of Engineers Minnesota Plan Review To be applied for Construction Permit to Work in To be applied for Department of Transportation Right-of-Way Signal Justification Report To be submitted Minnesota Environmental Health Services To be applied for Department of Water Permit Health Minnesota Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be applied for Pollution Control NPDES Construction Permit To be applied for Agency (MP,x-,rA EAW Negative Declaration To follow EAW City of preparation Right-of-Way Plan Approval To be -applied for , Maplewood Roadway Improvement Plan To be applied for Approval Ramsey County Construction Permit to Work in To be applied for Right-of-Way Wetland Plan Review To be applied for Ramsey - Grading and Construction Permit To be applied for Washington Metro Watershed District Storm Water and Water Quality Plan Review and Approval, To be applied for Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Metropolitan Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be applied for Council 4. Extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies. The proposed project is similar to many recent projects completed throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Although each site is unique, the anticipated environmental effects are common for this type of project. The impacts are relatively predictable and do not pose significant concerns in terms of long -term effects of the project. County Road D Realignment Project -03125103 Finding of Fact Page 14, CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings, the City of Maplewood has determined that the environmental review requirements have been met by the EAW prepared for this project, and that the potential environmental effects are not considered significant. Therefore, an EIS is not needed. County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Page 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Comment Letters (Separate Attachment) County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Attachments ATTACHMENT 2 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Recommendations for Construction (Separate Attachment) County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Attachments ATTACHMENT 3 County Road D Realignment Project EAW Distribution List (Separate Attachment) County Road D Realignment Project 03125103 Finding of Fact Attachments CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. XX -XX A RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEGATIVE FINDING OF THE NEED FOR FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR THE EXTENSION OF COUNTY ROAD D BETWEEN HAZELWOOD AND TH 61 (City Project 02 -07) AND FROM TH 61 TO HIGHRIDGE COURT (City Project 02-08) AND AUTHORIZING DISTRIBUTION OF THE NEGATIVE FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is the Responsible Governmental Unit for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Extension of Count y Road D from Hazelwood to TH 61 (City Project 02 -07) and from TH 61 to Highridge Court. (City Project 02- 08); and WHEREAS, the EAW was prepared and distributed to all parties on -the State Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution list, as well as local agency representatives and the petitioners' representative; and WHEREAS, the EAW Notice of Availability was published in the EQB Monitor on February ry , 2003, beginning a 30 -day comment period that ended on March 5, 2003; and WHEREAS, written comments on the EAW were received and considered from all parties; responses were developed, and findings were prepared; and WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to make the final determination on the adequacy of an EAW and the related negative or positive declaration as to the need to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the EAW requires that plans pertaining to q p p g stormwater, grading, erosion control, and buffer /turf management be submitted for approval as part of the design process. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council has determined, based on the findings contained in the Record of Decision, that the environmental review requirements have been met by the Environmental Assessment Worksheet prepared for the Extension of Count Road D from Hazelwood to TH 61 (City Project 02 -07) and from TH 61 to Highrid e Court g (City Project 02 -08), and the potential environmental effects are not considered significant enough to warrant preparation of an EIS; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Council requests that the negative declaration be distributed to all parties on the State Environmental Quality Board distribution list and all persons commenting in writing on the EAW. E a v 0 ca U O U CD O L Q ^ Q lV I Z o O� Q I I I i -•� I i i 1• i S LI -` ;� I 1 1 I I .1 1 I • t - I t + � � I I , - � , , - • ti I J i l l �! W t1. 1 a= I I I I f O G D :` 1 1 1 I I III CL� 1 1 1 % >a U o rL I _ I LO 1 t t , 1 1 1 E r ' 1 + -� _._, -� 1 *N 133 �1.1S QOOM�i3Zd H N tr. EE k: r t 1 w,,:;, m� 1 1 Ir - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . J I ;:;;a :. �• 1� 1 1, 1 J f q '':• L "y: 1 j ! ! I I ( j � � to ' "`'��, I! I I 1 1 If c� W cx--z CL co ix I �� 1 1 t i i t �� �• ���'�� -1 11 i ► �'i.t J / ti 1 I ,� 1, l, l l 1 g ,'• t o o UJI (t 1 Ld I a if 1 1 I .... ....... ... ........... F t - I 1. 1 1 1! 1 � UC .`` � I t .• f �� Z � I I co - - - - - - - - -- .i a ( t , I t 1 S � ::ti.�• � C,�� , f f j 1 a G • ti L:' � �� ' ' a j I Ma I 0 :0 1 ' ���tt k 3g Of Q I ,� I I 1 , 1 l O j j j I aZ If f f D + 1 1 I• 1 1 I l k - -- _ ���� � � I ( 6 1MP'£0- 1181H)( S1lell -I 3 \LOOZ6£6 , \: (90 GYM 3ll4 )ISIO Wd99 :£ £OOZ 'L1. uot` 'MYCI 10ld 0 O ,s fl rl � II1) 1 1 1 01 I 1 I f l fi _ � i rI 1 ' /•• d � + .I I I / a III t <m - 11 1 M a Z I I I I r l r I I � r � ,/ • 1 ,. I 11 t 133k§ Q0OM H r r I I III z ---- ------- - - - - -� —s r► I r i rl in I ri I r I I I .II 2 to IL I ( I I I rl Wv %m I IL LLJ wo r! r , � Iii ` '•-�i 1 � � ° I I I on j \ \ \az00 !p- 7 I 8 1 p tL 1 y mz§ I I ° ( ,p,,1t?jvf 1 ,III I 1 + ► a r' —_; - • I f U l 1 1 ++ iEm tj 1 I I I iI It f i i 1 ►11 fil ° `' J C r I I - r i i 1 I N r �'` W 1 1 1 , rrr r , I l l � •/• 1 I 1 = W 1 , 1gw 0 J i� ii Il i ° ° M f i i i 1 ILm � i I Sri Z = o I L / I �1 1 \:a (90'40 3Y+lYN 311j ASIa LuoL£ :6 £OOZ 'OZ uor 31110 10-1d a Agenda # MEMORANDUM Acti= by C_�? _,....,,i1 TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager D «,.w...�.a,, Endorsed,+ FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk odihec' . R ejected_ � DATE: March 23, 2003 RE: One Time Event — Champp's of Maplewood In July of 1996 the City Council amended the city rdinance allowing intoxicating Y g cating liquor license holders the authority to host one -time events not exceeding 6 hours total duration uratzon and not recurring within one calendar year. Since its inception, I estimate stlmate that we have had approximately 14 "one -time events." They have ranged from a boxing ard a i roast, g pig st, to outdoor concerts. Milt Authier, on behalf of Champp's of Maplewood 1734 Adolphus Street, et, has applied for a permit to hold a one -time event on July 26, from 7:00 .m. to 11:00 .m. Second H p p Harvest Food Shelf will benefit from the event. Chief Thomalla and I met with Mr. Authier, the event coordinator and manager of the restaurant, along with Judith Landreville who is the holder of their liquor license. During uring the event a live band will be playing music. The event will be held in the arkin lot p g with the stage for the band facing 35E South. The area where the event is being planned is in the parking lot area on the south side of the building. A map (see attachment 1) shows the setup of the area. The event area will be enclosed with a 6' fence and will have two entrances that will be manned by Champp's staff that have had training in alcohol compliance checking identification at the entrances. Mr. Authier will also hire security from the Ramsey County Sheriffs office. While it is difficult to estimate, Champp's staff is re arin for approximately p p g pp mately 500 attendees total throughout the evening. Residential property owner's within 350 feet of the event have been contacted (see attachment 2) and have signed the Noise Control Consent Form for the event. The Police Department can and will revoke the waiver, based on any complaints received during the event or violation of the waiver request. One -time events are typically approved by the City Manager. Although ' in Y g g t his request i s no comparison In scope to the one time event held on June 23, 2001, it was the decision of management to seek council approval. s x ti r a Apo i o o r + :m ED 'A -�4 •AIfaEV�Q�p - :vg .a.riFi yiy p�rrw3:x. � (t r n F i v " I Affa chnr u+.x` Larpenteur Avenue � � dLdt�ce,c mz, Location Ma w LO (Y) (3) U) Cl) M .c O � 1 Larpenteur Avenue � � dLdt�ce,c mz, Location Ma AGENDA A ITEM AGENDA REPORT Aeon by Council TO: Richard Fursman City Manager Date Endorsed FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer ineer Modified Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer Rejected SUBJECT: Atlantic Street Water Main and Utility Extension North of Frost City Project 03 -16 Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study DATE: March 24, 2003 Introduction The city council will consider approving the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility study for the extension of water main and other utilities on Atlantic Street north of Frost Avenue. Background The city council recently approved a conditional use permit for Ohlson Landscaping at 1949 Atlantic Street. One of the conditions of the site plan was that the applicant extend water main north from Frost Avenue to their property, as well as extend sewer and water services and storm sewer to the property. Attached is a letter from Ohlson Landscaping, Inc., petitioning the city to provide municipal water p service to their property. Ultimately it is anticipated that this will be part of a redevelopment area and that water main would be needed in this area regardless of what might happen in the area. Discussion There is currently a petition before the council, but this petition only represents one of what could potentially be a number of property owners who would be affected by a project. Therefore this should be treated as a council- initiated project (4 votes). Recommendation Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Feasibility Study for the Atlantic Street Water Main and Utility Improvements North of Frost Avenue, City Project 03 -16. CIVIC jW attachments: Resolution Ohlson Landscaping Letter Location Map RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to make water main and utility Improvements to p Atlantic Street, north of Frost Avenue, City Project 03 -16, and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, p ursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the -city e for g o study and that he is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the . i p g council n a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, �' effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement p ovement as recommended. . FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $5,000 areappropriated to re are this feasibility report. prepare 1706 Barcla Street Maplewood, MN 55109. (651)748 -1566 Fax: (651) 779-4246 March 12,, 2003 Chuck Ahl, Cit En City of Maplewood 1830 East Count Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: New Construction/Commercial 1949 Atlantic Street Sewer/Water Main Extension Dear Mr. Ahl: Thank y ou for takin time to speak with Chris Cavatt re our.re for public improvement on Atlantic Street. We are respectfull re the Cit to conduct this public impro . veme*nt project to extend the water and sewer main down the len of Atlantic Street. We understand that there'will be f utur e developments occurrin in that area within the next ten y ears, which will re these mains to be "tapped into We have enjo workin with members of the Cit Staff durin the course of our own ovement pro and impr 4 . have been impressed with their cooperation. As we. have stated to certain members of the Cit we do hope to be a part of the redevelopment process when the opportunit arises. However, those projects are far in the future and can alwa be altered. We look forward to y our response. Please contact me an with q uestions y ou ma have. Most Respectfull ephani ac V-P, C.F.0 CC: Erik OhIson — President, CEO Thor OehrIe'ffi R C E ED, S.CAP.�S. @IfC. i 2flt t_ rl dsc ov ....... . . v� L g'- g g g N '. n OEM 3244 236 9m v 5 Z k ag 1224 ? gn ME . .......... . .......... i 2flt t_ rl dsc ov ....... . . v� L g'- g g g N '. n OEM 3244 236 i 2flt t_ rl dsc ov ....... . . v� AGENDA ITEM AGENDA RE_ PORT TO: Richard Action b Counci d Fursman, City Mana e �' c�� f Manager FROM: Charles Ahl Public c Works Director /City Engineer Chris Cavett City Engineer , Assistant Ci g' SUBJECT: Carver Avenue Tr - ' unk Sanitary Sewer Improvements 1' � Preparation Feasibility Project 03 -17 Resolution Ordering p anon Of Feasibility Study DATE: March 24, 2003 Introduction The city council will consider approving the attached resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility study for the extension of a trunk sanitary sewer main east from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor locat map). ed near Sterling Street (see location Background Recently the assistant city engineer tY g eer and the environmental • 56-year-old health officer visited a residence o g year old septic system that poses an immediate Carver Avenue with a failing ►mediate environmental health treat. Although ashort-term solution has been proposed, an acceptable mu st be considered that is within the long -term solution I require best interest of the community On p Y q e that the existing septic system be Y e option would be to simp Y replaced, however there is limited s , there are other properties in the immediate pace on the property. In addition and limited lot areas. mediate area with septic s stems Y The other option would be to consider extending municipal sanitary which lie i se s approximately 600 -feet east of the M rY wer to serve this properly, CES Interceptor. Based on the So Study, which is being Prepared at � South Maplewood Sewer • • on, as development occur p this time, there are undeveloped properties ea. In addition, p p perties directly adjacent to this area. s to the east, this segment of Carver Avenue will be the Proposed alignment for a trunk sewer main. Discussion This project should be treated as acouncil- initiated project (4 votes). Recommendation Staff recommends that the city council approve the attached resolution Preparation . Y ounc� p n of a Feasibility for the Ca Ordering the Improvements Cit Pr Carver Avenue Trunk Sanitary Sewer y P 03 -17. j CMC attachments: Resolution Location Map RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY WHEREAS, it is proposed to ;make sanitary sewer improvements along Carver . g Avenue, east of Sterling Street, City Project 03 -17, and to assess the benefited properties for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minn p , p esota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the city engineer for study y g and i that he s instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising he . i g council n a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in p p connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. are FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $10,000 are appropriated to re this prepare this feasibility report. I 9; Y.m y s .h'YSt ` i 4`'1°s'Y'sG•S'fE,V, f�f sk m i :,,^v p • " a.: �ufg a y s �M" .: MR rYr 7 s E£ E c s c , yi x,e ' yx� '�CX w nr yt' r twxry N .f 3tr ,� u�r'bF a f x 4x S 4 sEnk fit° USE .tXF.e S,asr4'^E >» y£ sJ „pates . ! c s�xs ts u"'Dy s F 's yl s x { <s k A Siab J� Ei# Ea'�. f l� i • ,,sf £s , S E ,y ° 3 s ,�,,Y' sr fs"� c{ /Q a Esicrsi ME s Y�•� !! ¢� s)y�'" b"�n s f � •" ��� i d§4 h ��`�t s �a.� s k r� i ! � �'�£v < s � { ���h T �' s _ �/ `G.�'`'e"�^3+�'Eks ( "' / t � : 2511 NO N IN i i "bi i ! i i i H MAI j i f<uf"Ef f - y � Ik�' �2tiC i E Iy s•:n � � 1p� i t i I i 07 AF ............................ ............................. I--,,*,^ . ..... A ... Q.- ... c . .`. ............... ............................... _._.....` .... * ..... - �w�y, - •• may .,E. I ._....._ __.......... ......................................................... ....... ................ ................... .... •- , X. Y k�S ••� a.aL;,f`t��yyEE;;; •,�� Y fk v':a�Z a2 N i E , / I 2620 J i `\ •__ ....... .._...._ .......... _.._._... ..._..._ ...............__.....! /f E w. LocAomv a 7 03 q M Ell q . ^� �.{y. w•� s` V'�,r`�n. „ cVM T'.C•` 2 '�Y .`, ~sV.,�Q�,,,�,,CI�s .....� a�i ).� \\.'. q �C gr'�__,.e,1 T' vs� .. i ^P�^'o +tea ,�. ��wMOtaf1,�M1 a'�3'i~if0� ~ 7 „ ocjYa� a ,...v \ .. .xq qqq (�.' , �`T�fR:tGtii�,, as s.. ••o:, � �� m a� �CAOf Mk'w �, 1 , cwrt..ei '�«rpo V�i.l:�ny,n.o.epi. `nswi�t�'�' fio �t ��r far Caps; , .. .. ... _ ?� �F�[lji�f�, �?! Oi� n� s� � '.a�ti��P`i ^�e�!l•...'�^.. -� ^`�' �• ��.�` @� 1� T zd' . �� a. �� -� k t v�'' Ya. ' oCCctii.�,'G ':acs �'�',” � � •WWTIEa..t��,aanee`:aa� �� s� a .u� ci+.@_. . ...; Q•� .. .. - `,�:�. ask... „ \ {a. c .: - `;k,L.il{NtYxi `� .. www.crMapfewood.mn.us AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager D C. FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer - y XA Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer Rejected SUBJECT: Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, City Project 02 -14 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids 2. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 3. Resolution Ordering Assessment Hearing 4. Approve Joint Powers Agreement with the City of St. Paul DATE: March 17, 2003 Introduction Final p Y city's and specifications for the above referenced project have been completed b the cit 's consultant, KHA, and are ready to be advertised for bids. - The proposed bid J ro opening for this project is p scheduled for 10:00 a.m., Friday, April 18, 2003. Award of bids would be considered by Y the city council at the April 28, 2003, city council meeting. Following the approval to advertise for bids, the next step in the improvement rocess is to prepare the p p p assessment roll and order the assessment hearing. In addition, the city council shall consider authorizing the mayor and city manager to enter the city into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of St.. Paul. g Y Background Only costs related to the street improvements are proposed to be assessed, and are not directly dependent on the actual amount of the bid, rather on a predetermined assessment rate established in the city's pavement management policy. The method of assessment is the same as was outlined in the feasibility study. A completed assessment roll is available in the office of the city engineer. It is recommended that the assessment hearing be scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, April 28, 2003. The Joint Powers agreement was drafted and reviewed by staff and has already been executed by the City of St. Paul. The agreement describes both cities' financial obligations to the project and how a ment will be made to the � p. Y e City of Maplewood. Based on the estimate in the study, St. Paul's share of the $608,800 project cost is $245,040 and will be billed following an award of contract. A copy of the agreement is attached. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the ' Parkway Avenue Lift Station Removal Improvements, Project 02 -14: Approving Plans and Advertisin g for Bids, Orde g g, ring the Preparation of the Assessment Roll and Ordering the Assessment Hearing, well as authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to enter the city into a joint powers agreement with the City of St. Paul. CMC jw Attachments 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids 2. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 3. Resolution Ordering Assessment Roll Hearing 4. Resolution Approving Joint Powers Agreement 5. Joint Powers Agreement 6. Location Map RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution ' on passed by the city and speC1cati esoluti council speci for Parkway Lift Station Re uncil on February 10, 2003 [ Prepared b (or Removal Improvements, Pro'ect 02- _ � p ans y under the direction of the f 14, have b s ) e city engineer, who has een pecifications to the council for a presented such approval, plans and NOV1/, THEREFO MA RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY PLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1 • Such plans and ' ' hereof, are her specifications, a copy of which ar eby approved and ordered a attached hereto and made apart placed on file in the office of the city .clerk. 2 • The city clerk shall r epare and cause to be inserted in Construction Bulletin p an advertisement for bids u the official paper and in the approved plans and specificatio upon the making of such improvement under such before the d specifications. The advertisement shall b p ate set for bid opening, shall a published twice, at least to publicly opened and g specify the work to be done n days considered by the council at ,shall state that birds will be hall and that no bids shall b 10 :00 a.m. on the 18th da a certifie a considered unless sealed Y of April, 2003, at the cif ed check or bid bond, payable and filed with the clerk and ac Y amount of such bid. p Y e to the City of Maplewood N[i accompanied b y nnesota for five percent of the 3 • The city clerk and r Y k and city enginee are here read aloud bids received at the by authorized and instructed receive, open, e time and place herein noted , to recei The council will consider the nd to tabu) e bids, and the award of a co ate the bids received. April 28, 2003. contract, at the regular g city council meeting of RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer.will receive bids for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, City Project 02 -14. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, City Project 02 -14, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the city engineer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 28th day of April 2003, at the city hall at 7:00 p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul mutually agree and desire to enter into a joint powers agreement for.the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements, Maplewood City Project 02 -14, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of.Saint Paul mutually wish to eliminate the Parkway Lift Station and construct a gravity sanitary sewer, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is the lead agency for this project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 'OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: that the Mayor and City Manager are herby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City of Maplewood, a Joint Powers Agreement between the cities of Maplewood and Saint Paul, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein by reference. JOINT - POWERS AGREEMENT City of Maplewood/City of Saint Paul Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements City of Maplewood Project 02 -14 City of Saint Paul Project 03• IC- IIA7 THIS JOINT - POWERS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 2003, by and between the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, and the City of Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul , pursuant to the provision of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 471.59, are authorized to enter into agreements to exercise jointly the governmental powers and functions each has individuall • and, > WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is proposing to complete the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements. The � ro' ect includes the removal of the exist' p J existing City of St. Paul Parkway Lift Station; the extension of new gravity sanitary sewer to connect to an existing Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer interceptor; the reconstruction of Larpenteur Avenue between Parkway Drive and Arcade Street (TH 61); and the replacement of watermain along Larpenteur Avenue. The proposed improvements are further detailed in the attached Feasibility Study and Report prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. d ated January 2003. WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul owns and operates the existing Parkway Lift M Station; and, WHEREAS, an existing agreement is in place between the City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul that establishes that the City f o y Maplewood pays 62 /o and the City of Saint Paul pays 38% of the operation and maintenance costs for-the existing P xlsting left station; and, WHEREAS, the proposed Parkway Lift Station Im p rovements benefit both the City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul; and WHEREAS, the costs for the proposed Parkway Lift Station Improvements shall therefore, be shared between the City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows, to wit: - 1 - 1. The City of Maplewood will serve as the lead agent for the completion of Y p the Parkway Lift Station Removal Improvements as detailed d in the attached Feasibility Study and Report. 2: The City of Maplewood will a for the costs to complete t p Y p he proposed improvements including all administrative engineering and construction g g tlon costs. 3. The City of Saint Paul will, upon invoice from the Ci of p y M reimburse the City of Maplewood for their p ortion of the administrative engineering and construction costs based upon the percentages identified in the Feasibility Study and Report. The estimated costs to complete the proposed improvements are as follows: onstruction Street and Storm Sewer $ 130,910 Sanitary Sewer $ 318 Watermain (Excavation Only) $ 13,900 Subtotal $ 46300 Y Administration & Engineering (31.5%) $ 145 Total $ 608 The City of Saint Paul's share of the project based upon the estimated costs presented above is $ The City of St. Paul's costs may vary depending P g upon the actual final costs for the project. 4. The City of Maplewood will prepare and. submit an invoice to the City of Saint Paul for 95% of the Saint Paul share of the project costs upon the award of the contract for the project by the Maplewood City Council. The City of Maplewood will prepare and submit an invoice to the City of Saint Paul for the remaining 5% of the Saint Paul share of the ro'ect costs upon the p J p approval of the final payment for the ro'ect b the Maplewood City p � y p Council. The City of Saint Paul shall pay the City of Maplewood within 30 days of the receipt of the invoices. 5. The City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul agree to indemnify each other and hold each other harmless from any and all claims and causes of - action to the extent provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466, et al., and all law related thereto. -2- 6. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by mutual agreement of the City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul or until its terms and obligations have been fulfilled, whichever is soonest. 7. It is agreed that, except ass specifically provided b the p y p y execution of this agreement, neither party relinquishes any rights or powers' possessed b it g p p y and neither party is relieved of an responsibility, dut o ' Y y r obligation Imposed on It by law or regulation. S. Data Practices: a. The City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul agree to comply pY with the Minnesota Data Practices Act and all other state and federa 1 laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. Y b. The City of Maplewood and the City f Saint Paul will ' ty 11 imm ediately report to each other any requests from third parties for information relating to this Agreement. c. The City of Maplewood and the City of Saint Paul agree to rom tl p p Y respond to each other's inquiries concerning data requests. IN WITNESS VMEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized representatives. . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Name: Robert Cardinal Title: Mayor Date: , 2003 By: Name: Richard Fursman Title: City Manager Date: 12003 CITY O S XINT PAUL }/ Name: Randy Kelly Title: Mayor Date: , 2003 And By: Name: Title: Office of Financial Services Date: I A (. , 2003 E l 1 4 : -3- Y as to form: t 4 By Ic � �' F f Name: Lisa L. Veith Title: Assistant City Attorney Date: � m-t� 2003 1P Name: Bob Sandquist Title: IArect c rO�pu�ic Works Date: ! � lar , 2003 February 5, 2003 -4- 00 BEAM AVE. o V). Q < cr Q a �P� 14 Gervais L-Ld Lake __j PALM In CT. PA-M CONNOR CON E CT. DE PROJECT CT. BR OO K S L O CA TI g 12 > 10 M FR Poo Pkw LITTLE CANADA Lake . . . . . .. . ... . . .... .... WA DR. LARK AVE. ' 0 VIKING V) Keifer w _j LU LAUR IE O_ (n w I Lake RD z a 0 0 < , w _j 0 cc_ z LAURIE CT . X z (n V) In Uj A COUNTY RD, COUNTY B Qj BURKE AV 140 (n aplecrest <1 FL rk z a. ELD RIDGE AV E. IELD IDGE and V) Z X Lake < BELMONT Oehrline 0 E LN. w Ui 0 0 Lake LMONT /A, L n V) V) (n SKILLMAN AVE. w SKILLMAN AV. SKILLMAN AVE. (n = � KENW OOD ICE A MT. VERNON L N. cn w Li-i I.., I < Q, D a- z 3: 0 0 AVE; BELLWOOD AVE. En Cn M DOWNS AVE. cL _j Uj z __j z< VERNON AV z 0 Cc) Ed w W S� 0 j a + Roselaw - n cr < Park Lzi z Park ROSELAWN CL C/1) z 0 B . BELL WO Cn �c WOO C) 0 =) 0 ELLWOOD AVE clf_ 0 v) < SUMMER AVE. 0 1-: 0 0 o (A 0 (L m L V) M_ SUMMER 0 0 Ld CT w 0 FENTON AVE. Cn 0 - U) �-- t 3:: z z z t , z < w D L) Uj (L Q � western 0 m V) z -0 _j z _j a V) ? AVE. (n Cn Hills j (n RIPLEY AVE. V) (n U . ) . . . . . . . ................................................................ . .. 0 KINGSTON LU .4j 0 z V) Cn (n z 9 Uj 0 < (n m KINGSTONZAV m - /'R �u n pp z 0 z 'ke' -1 M 1< Q AVE Lda k _j W 0- <@> .-2: '%— cr_ ED PRICE z AVE V) D 0 0 Cn of Uj < 7) AVE. (L < m LARPE NTEUR (Wn ... .... . ... 7 " Tr SAINT PA UL Kll'l'lle CITY 'OF MAPLEWOOD and A ssociates, Inc. pARKWAYLIFT STATION REMOVAL LOCATIO MA p 2550 Universit Ave. W., Suite 345N St- Pout- MN 55114 Tat. No. 651) 645-4197 Fax No, MI) 645-5116 CITY PROJECT 02-14 EXHIBI T I AGENDA ITEM AGENDA.REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City an Action by Council Y ager � FROM: Charles Ahl Date Public Works Director /City Engineer Chris Cavett Assistant Endorse nt City Engineer d . SUBJECT: Kennard /Frost Street Improve Rejected p ements, City. Project 02 -10 J ted 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising -/ ing for Bids 2. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll DATE: March 20, 2003 Introduction Final plans and specifications for the above r project have been comp leted to be a referenced proj leted and advertised for bids. The proposed bid opening p are ready M 2 2 p g for this project is scheduled for 10:00 Friday Y, y 003. Award of bids would be considered b t ' y he city council at the May 12, 2003, cit Y council meeting. Following the approval to advertise for bids, the next step in the improvement mprovement roces ' assessment roll. process is to prepare Background Only costs related to the street imp rovement s are proposed to be assessed, and are not dire dependen p p nt on the actual amount of the bid, rather on a directly 's pavement predetermined assessment rate established in the cit Y . bility stud p t management policy. The method of assessor in the feasi . A com lete ent is the same as was outlined Y p d assessment roll is available in the office of ' is recommended that the he city engineer. It assessment hearing be .scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, 12 2 Y� Y 003. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve • pp ove .the attached resolutions for the Kennard /Eros t Street Improvements, Project 02 -10: Approving aratio pp oving Plans and Advertising for Bids and Ordering the Preparation. n of the Assessment Roll. j W Attachments 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising or Bids 2. Resolution Ordering Preparation g 9 p anon of Assessment Roll 3. Location Map RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on January 1 to .ands specifications for Y ry 3 , 2003, plans p Kennard /Frost Street Improvements, Project 02 -10 have been p b the cit p p y (or under the direction o f) y engineer, who has presented such plans ands specifications to th council for approval, p e NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE MINNESOTA-' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the cit clerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official ' paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement . , g p ovement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be ublished twice at p least ten days before the dates et for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on the 2nd day f Ma ' y y, 2003, at the city .hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed t ' o receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract at the regular city ' May 12th 2003. � g y council meeting of Y , RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the Kennard /Frost Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. thereof. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council e JAI Cj 3 c, G3 P C3 ONARRVS Ak �O �� ❑ r-3 C} O 0 150 p o � o • Q c� 0 0 Q1 � �QDO C� m o p0 OODO C3 Q m 4� o . o 0 8 D � Q o aO ° o 0 o O� d Q a o � o p O Oo a ❑ C g 0 O Q u 0 ]I 133 CIO P -9 p 4 0 o ° b d30.6 FROST AVL o 0 d cm d D a D ell- D O � L� °0Op CP o �, 7 o ❑ Do o v � 0 • 130 c 0 ❑ 8 D 08 C1 O pp 13 Co 0 c3 � 4 � D Q . O SUMM O 4 Q o. o 0 AvE �� ��' Q 0 0 ° a D Q O 00 o � D �a t O Q a El Q a 0 1313 Q a O O Q ❑ o Q t o ❑ Q° E 11 ° a D 0 0 C3 0 CM o �o 0 WQ ° Q CP ❑ fl j O o J=O 0° .173 o 0 Za p C I CU 0 COQ B 9 O� p D It -to lJ Q d � • Dp ° Q C� p g ° °0 °o ❑� 43 13 ° o Q C30 ❑ 0 Ep o V ° ❑ ^Q0. C 0 ° a Q oe j BCD oa a „ ❑ ❑ ❑ °o Q ° D ❑ 0 8 d a ° ca 1, Imo' o . oD (� 2 p p o o o 0 Q ❑ o � o ❑ ?6 B o p 0 ❑0 Q ° . o� D a U o Q O d 2 o . o L0 s o 0 o 0 000 a D Og o LARPTOVTEUR AVE. D 03 r--1 a o O o - � ❑ O EM Q 17 no Scale PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT Exhibit 2 Project Scope Kennard /Frost Area Improvement 02 -10 STREET IMPROVEMENTS u AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer ineer Chuck Vermeersch, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfac - y ng, City Project 03 02 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids 2. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll DATE: March 21, 2003 Introduction Final plans and specifications for the above referenced ro'ect have p � e been completed by the city engineer and are ready to be advertised for bids. The proposed bid opening or this project is g p J scheduled for 10:05 a.m., Friday, May 2, 2003. Award of bids would be considered by the city council at the May 12, 2003, city council meeting. Following the approval to advertise forbids, the next step n the improvement p p process is to prepare. the assessment roll and order the assessment hearing. Background Only costs related to the street and drainage improvements are proposed to be assessed and are not directly dependent on the actual amount of the bid, rather on a redetermined assessment rate e established in the city's pavement management and drainage assessment policies. The method of assessment is the same as was outlined in the feasibility study. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03 -02: Approving lans and Advertising 9 for Bids., and Ordering the Preparation of the Assessment .Roll. CJV j W Attachments 1. Resolution Approving Plans and Advertising for Bids 2. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll 3. Location Map RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed b the city council specifications for Ma Y Y cil on March 10, 2003, plans and Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfacing, Pro'ec. engineer, who g� Y Project 03 -02, have been prepared by the city g has presented such plans and specifications to the council i! for NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CO MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA: UNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1. Such plans and specifications, a co of which ar hereof are hereby copy a attached hereto and made apart y approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted official ' din the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement approved plans and specifications. The a p under such advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to Y publicly o pened p Y be done, shall state that bids will be p y p ned and considered by the council at 10:05 a.m. on the 2nd day of May 2003, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and ac a certified check or bid bond, a able to the C' companied by payable City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby uthorize • Y d and instructed to receive, .open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bid ' The council will consider the bids, and the award s received. of a contract, at the regular city council of May 12, 2003. g meetin RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer will receive bids for the Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03 -02. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the ro er amount to be p p specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land , abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided b law, and t p y they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. thereof. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council 1f: • �, ♦ ; ` ... ;>; / ! . ..£�, . mss. _ ,r• . -- i»� .. r ... . . _ }, • • »- :vYNS- '?}3lt�tifr.izt... � ] _ _ .:rt �•- �2C-f>•[R 1 x w. )a ... / P . '•y C 5 1�•. rxYN� 'GU µ;a•.tit�.a[" • :.'L _ i P� � {.Y.:• p::: > ...; :'SC ��r�• [� �i�f>rt<`x. t \ V / . ✓ +± -UUYt - � ' 1 � : KY.yT -'f W>_..`^^Y' if, �44s££- ♦ •'.� ••ptx fru .. y. ^N.YS, •i'ft.Y'SM �.. - �,F.;' ^ s.rzti� ".�<. .<z 'Y:`c:x. •es>. "i:.�["�" ♦ / . ,.�j•�' •.•?ft :fi it �'. 'zau.., �t,�:]s:< �r ^...'•'.:..: v - .j ".,.:.: ...:�,.. . "... S' - '. w•t ' ]::: \ / _: t ' - t >>' A 6.� _ :: � • YL': .' T^;., ,S G_ - a x £:tiY " +., .s'fe::: s':•m . < t • .�'... �1 :W ". >s / � ., . , - Ir .. � �%�. _ r � . _ ..: x.- :t` ...... ._ - x'ii�'. <':�`- '.S;•:]�?.x J {� •t : .. � % " -ree:� �.5.•, ., :_ ° ua, �� / / s•_ •,. .. ', � . •rrz.5"<e• `�feo* �,� �x�-y',., •':':+i ?,-' C ;�.;tii:e'� ?: .:. .. :;: r.: .':'_: :i: 'i ': :4f.",. w. zx::i .rr ; .;x2,sr ' 4 :.. Yom.. �� sac�=: :�t�E 'T�c�y. -�3 ax., . . • : \ \ / / s .. � _ � m. _ � x _ ,.�ilE..sE �J. � .: � _. ::: _3 .. , =� � 4t r��yvn.Y :, af' :- ��'-•'„ -k «" .f: Y '- ��>_.l- g fx r ^, -• .� :ts., : >tx ' : > / / � 5. _ �1' r i s :s '- ' --.•., -rc •�f N . i �r ^Y�• ; ,;F.. tl. ' , r . • ?is)- °`i•.:ai«z'q t3"t ,• _ Z� , -a / /,, _ , rxt iG r • .i¢.i f. t? \ / / e _tom. - - •i .. x _ = f F.. "WON, " is bii>:c_f , r . � l / / x. .. r < t��ss $• :- % - a '_£ec' � � - ., '� : , sg 2 -- ' - s, ts:�:rt�g>•>. .:r•:sx aGxf9.z.. • .L ,. a _ . '[,t \ / .. � r. r x ,.[ ' -_.iY:::: x -� r _ .. ^}t:.,e•::t<.,��s' �.Y �. - :;�;ib• ,v �° : r ''s t / t• 'tat` • . : s _ .r ^•8`I< 'icr; ' 4' - - - _ _' T: - - - - - - ! max. .. . - _ _ Y 'x ff?3Y' _.`� - -: c� _ .(m>.> .. t i '. :t a' , : _ _ .. / y� - �i+a>e"L•e::G „"..]. •a]1t' 1.4 • ' • _,' n '�' : '- -• / /1 � „S '4t .i - +o+3•r � � ✓� _ __ _ - > <ifr<ts: - .fyt c /••✓.i•• - �1 G .LL` >!'/Ha` - >^ »3' -Y.. _ � t _ ���z _ .i:J �.::i�Ll ���r L,.fs....-- _- #"Si.. �]k%x y<stLa - ti "f; � z 1 't ' � ""?' - -- - .....t.i., = •g+ ,- _ •g_ es; _ -::t t l : "x"r t> - - •°!] '� - I f - rx5:r .2c_= •<7J>SS:: eyyff,,tTTL((ena '"E. ..,.t - _"x.' ':•str - / ] , ...:• _. _- _2�.. ......X:s: � ^• r &a.2' "_ ^-' - i z .. ... 3"„t%'. .S: i.:3.i 4 - Yom, a • .•s . 3 1 r - - _ - - ! s - / Z ft <<55<<�� ^��� 1 •r / '#`ayR�f•Y �i w L r J ..rYy�•yL��� qqp / ' 34G>� �• ... _.. tx< � _ ,?kk <Z' f F <.. k . : i . � . ,1 � .•.,� -^ • � rfr; /. .r •'� • - ' va,cu 4 - -<. „^- - v9, � azx �} . ' •'+�c . '� ! r',37� - •yt '- � ✓ ' - ��s• - '� / / ::fi>.$ `l."",'- r �.�,._ F.�*i / I r .S . '"y'�"" - . r < "ti• _ »f�: "]' a.'� r •'_�•c»� sdt :»�51' / ^.a .'nrK .,n .. � � it 'ia."` 'a+f - ' x•'a ' _ _ ,..cx[sL � / N - J" > 1 '`' _ ..� • ld .' <'fR^� •• • %% / �`.. err'; f,. r c 's. �" - c>4i sv', •� � tr / • ! / ! !•'.'�:.^,� paa,.,s<-: .�r�: _ t,nx L: . fs. "' :7' • z .rnKe z_ ' a. '': __s>, - eix•�" / / / f I .�'':�' .>� ; ••�• ..; �,t` .s?°xe;5; ... __ : .. _ -� - >s'�- r r do !',[' � ! / VS 3' • `•„X.. :,iex % •• "'.'z't'L'rix ... s � __ - w�-•"' �''• :,^� Yi- , �. ^... • r •>- : .. ..��; - . , `• _ _ .srz - • - "`- �w .• -'r . ^ '�'3 - .���o- :<�:ix ;p , � ..i, � '' ' _ rS'' _ �C. .'•�• -'sus . / / < ._ r» as '�- '3�'••'`"'^.. - - 3 - �• �_` ":�u '"'ice"' r ^�i-Gr -/ ! ! I • . [� _ '. .ak: �t�s�.'���-�'` -dy / / ;.... - '.ptr " ��.:•a.•��.��'• - �•`�x . ate• _ T < �, ::=•[- ', :�t, Fes: <�f � ! / �Z'�•:.. i:: •� _ . " .3 "` �. ` .- " L2fA�. .d.. .r•*_ • >�a. <r>za:`" xO l :f. � ;•. ' •'£?. >� 7 .r. ! �r� � + ^ . ��¢ _< . t.. � ^• ;t... • �x •fc =�,tf - ... . K z _ _ki Yom^ .. / �: fi iYx3's< .... >. _�, , •�•i '� / i ' .: 5. •�i tk•. :x:/' ,,.z <,•�- �ro3 � "� 3F:. .s . "fi r.. _ / / �. ]'E i- baai•. ].§;. - �+ 4 4 � ,tT ' ""r * z �• _ �� .,y • x �• _ - / ! ,.x .L `t•. / " ti x x` - x - _ _,, j� � . .•- .�%' rC �.<i:3xc - ! l Htr• ' 7f x ^- » •``�:�t�5,`�s _.�: > / / - •�`'3. ' �'`�xa .��� ; -;� - <• . � ]:'`"- '-�• ° ^y .' - _ ' ' „/€ .. / I f i J _ :�•.y['4••i4, 'F:p � • '�_' �.YJ ! •• t r< ,:r'• ` _ `�'tr^ -' �' 's .. ! ! / et i4��- .,>']r,K]er>yrbrCU{ .. '" .�r 'Sy aY! / ��� . -'•%t .. � � _ N - �,,: `n . -.. uht - �,ATW*:­-O. ' i x .: A •r ...' • �a'•���...�, - �.. <rEv / ! >y�s� / , " f bps` ` � � #. '>.'>•y:i ; : _ _ _ .. • s i [' ',v 'a''?� / / 'c3g • '- ,.[{! , >:tt. , d....� �•�:. t�::��w'��i' �: �-:: is � _ ! ( 1 JI Q_,.x�. aL'e`tY �i 4 X ebAj5 M. Zn;i *' •y}; .taw- I � 1 _ �: i.ily; -. r...' / ` ^ > . £'�.°. ! :r x < "z" -s '� -� � ..• t � D��:: _ _ l I 1 r. 1 ...I c `-- __ -- -- --------------------------------------------------------- ••�_ � .. -----•------------------------- - - - - -- -_ -- ��. -- -------- - - - - -- --------- --------- - - - - -; 1 - -- --------- - - - - > ------------------------------------ _ - -- ------ `3•i'`'"� � iir'•. / r ^ •e'9 "r `��•t� Y � 4 1 fs•- r. � t ,� 4_!�,' J ! f TA V:: / i a �_._ s, r _ _ 1 1 ( 1 1 f z � .. f 3Tyi 11 tj t I r 11 jj gig Bi n ! r! ! l t ']�• � r . --- ------ / 1 d a r I ~� 1 I In • - £> 1Y \_ "•�^ 7 ! 7 J r i / - - - - - - _ - - 1 l � 1 1 ! z:`a "'t�i'• I � =;�:� . r t 1 1 1 1 I M9 k '� 1 •� <�sclFL _ ♦ - j 1 4 I jV f � y�,�o{ �Z€ i �" , ^ - �'�-- e�,rr .a �"'T rY � •+ -..:• _ _ -, � 1' � - i ( z 1 „ si Al l 7 - .` = Ci z ,e.J 1 / - - -. t: - - - - - - - - - ' 1 ti< � " _ - ��. se' £. + ff,,...11 M' :. f , ? £ l •�, - _ _ - _ s's [ . `, :' •.. . I ! w� `> 1 Y- ){5`'. ll � - "r A U '�r z ls4 �>J / ( J 4 x ,�.:. r f,:ti< l r � / / / i / ( 1 . � v � 4 t �' - - - y ,ti.� S•,. . \ R � t � j� 1•i�4� ?: 1 7 4 J ,+.. v 1 4 51 r,�",`:..'rfY `; �, ' t �`.7y .y]r�L� ` (1 E . 1 r �{ r►J r ♦�.- :d _ S '' 1 I 1 I i ?'t n% ^ut�� '. rz `.• 1 �? t i . \_ __ -- \ / / 4 1 Y �} 1 - - - -�• �3 s�r �� " -: �' 1 r'.. „t �'x• : sy `�S`v. - 1 1 1 '' 'f� - � - r *. F AI c':r I fii4 1 t 1 �d4s ^ir �`' ` 1 }t 1 ,�.. ' y"� :n �... •. \ - - - -_ - I 1 :ltd iti,�./ 1 r f t s.. .:� \ - ':�yii,:_; t•: ' :;.:::.:::t;, ...._ -,a_ 1 � 1 I l "'1:'r °• f :`• �� n>�x`.L' ° c: 1 t:T - -- -_ -- - "- ,a:K' 1 _ _ --` � 1 t l k; :•' % ' ► ! / ! I • ' I , .:.� :.•ne M.4 f•.•s 'q•ir`.:•:i:s :� ;__ :..n..,. '�E l 4 1 1 .f :... / J J I l " -itR6 "c` pa � \ t 1 - •. 3.:•: _ _ =ff2 ^5".: = 1 1 ; ,:.1. l ,•- J':'s "`: �, "^ ► 1 _: -_ - -- "` -'-a. 1 1 11 I Q l �. -• I I/ f I ' 1 •s_: rr •:f::; r ig t` >x�: o.•£,s - - __ _:L - - sE =;Sfri : ; y .. .. 1 1 � - - - - _ .'t - - vg .! • -, i•. i' > file 1 1 4 > _ _ !, l f / r' J ����`•a''�� 'Yt`L>! r lyt�• ,.» - - - 1 .. - - - _ - - - - - -• _ _ .7/. / =`Yr: ". N -•n:. sue- : ^�., ._, ; ' :N - _ I 1 r _ , •'�"" '- r... - ,.>...ra "„• ; .,:,, .. a'.i'. .: •..::::. •,,. :� -- _ i » £. i':, �: : -J.;. •`� f / J J r :: .> .... • to , ..;�.. t \ .: .... .. . ___. ... •... - •:.. to r i3 •` ? -- - I l 1 - - _ - - :fx ..... •.. -:..:: ; : `. • : r: • : ^^• <.a: ' :' i. ? _ ''i_> - : '! f / / k>:r.sw�L iTta..•� -- .... - - 1 f fzt• <rf -/- L .. .. _.. .: ........ ... :]. ..., ..» ._..:._ «. ...._. .. ..., .. .. ___ __ _:. ..:.: .:.:�..:•,"'.", :iC - / PiYi:`YyIJUf :" -f Y`u. p c t 1 _ _ _ 1 f ' - t • .. er..::n:.:si:a_. +.: ».... :: rt Y: - - • -� r_ fr' -.i :::ir i °'�� •L - _ 1 ./;: / ^�•� •v 'f�• t °.L:. ::ii' „:;f' _; �,�rfroi,: �4i�::= a::• "".�:rr:,iz:ii•_v.e �_s, n r �:i =•' ____- - __ >: / f �. -�.�'. •^� ..y'. ':.:: a • ;...� ..:i r. ,[•.. [ »...,.__..: .. •._... -. :J3- _"5'.:.•^.y^- ::'•:]:C::: Y:�:�.. _. 3Y�: �Z � _ J.•�� J l . 3�Y • ` -_ Ka i ''_'':..::':..:.:. .._. 'i' i .� a y� , � .,, �� _ :_..:. i::.-r__ .::.'s:,: K:3 ?r "._.>• -_ y ..:::. ^ - -._ :•-1:r � :s:sf! :::K4f3 ?:•� ?:�EE'e:'.: =_ ?�xa �;;: sy>ss_p _ ' ^:= • r • / +A ,�, "':_� \ ...:. m: ,: _..:_.... .r<::nv >_ .:::•: r]= ;:;cam =.e -=::L : c: _- a'- ;-�zZ;Ls ' a `�"2. .L �' \ .:. .= max• - • -- ._ _........_ _..... _.. i,_i. ...9.. ;,_., », - .._.... _ .... � `J. J ! ,'a,= • :.:::_ crr a._� S: le LiaLii •xi':E3: <3_'= i ?,c:z :i.:: �. i ° =-i' ce, t / / ' t p .1;:1: / 1 l f / \ .w. Se:... _ ..::� :. »i: ei:i'�ic i:e:c-' -e_ cx: >•e _._ iF •. _ _ / 1 L "`'.•` . � l y � <ik tt §'' '&?, • "„ e:c =`i • 7 �� _: = Z;'_•y c3 �:��,r..: is_Eifi::3-_ =:- .] :.4 ?; :� ::f iE••.' -.: ': / V'-Y' ;.'.`� / t •Sx •��',��t1 "ice ,n:;>: yy _ .. /, 1 _.:. � , :.......:= :?iK -•: _.4i _:'?'�. �'�r:� p / '1.:�:./ / I / b �J6t[;�,g � • O ' OL_" : -\ \ _. - -_ -= ». � =^ :::•L: •- _ / / t; ! / t , 'a 4���tt' Y436'.: x '•7,�[ ,.,.: f / r z" MY>: :1 .:.tt<t .r s . a'k' ., .�35 •' _ -- - _ 'G� __' �;c:c : ?r �i!:e;xi ,/:';% i _ - - .._':s: :.,y, '� `�' ._I ! v'�<tt, sf c" s,•'yr`s%: °!;.'. s = _ .�i Fi:ry R ✓.r +I / > , ake� r ..l :_ •. ., :,_ ::.:::•.'.^.,_::: iZ...,.. - S•] ^ -: _..... _.. _ , J. _ � C ..._... `_•:_ / � u v • - _.._.. ! ..: +...,: ._ ....mei.•y»iic <v:i:�r::.i:;l;� f > > �. y .. c.1 . i }• , ="� ef • � \. ....,.- ..vL._ . =_s„]s a::':i3:s :iiiCL•eN :�:[":�•":.`..: a;:_�.:-:..��•- zs._..s _::f,d3i:•_7a?:i 1 ! . • �, ♦�,�;. - - -- ::::yli:i �>� � "i's: - ;• ; - ` ��Gt _�� _- �=>' �.�_� €��- rte_; = 13 Iz;,' - ,� I ,� a>.• 1 / - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - _• - - - _ _ , _ .c _ _ _ ---- •------- •--- - -__.. - _ _ - - - - :3 °c� -i ::. ••.._:.:::. Vii. :ea•!.i vx _ - - - - - - - - -_- viii' - _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - - -.!:•: / / / / - - - - - - - - - - - _ .. _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *�'nz4.. „� '. .: \T_ - ^... ._:.:.c.s....... c•: s:•::c ,Ero._ri:tE.' =_ __ »:3ar ir >2 ^,:� -- �.'%'v / J J / • r i T :• ..iii J� f / >Y>i • ...:�: �: .. r f �'• F?� %, 'x "�"f,`f.• r ',.�,:\ • _• ::• ,.::: ;,.. .::i,'r. :: - +.: _ _ _ `E:t•_:r' _ fi , r,,[.a v ?., :�•,. � I l . � - . :... x'£.'•.e:�.SY :� .- \ - _ :, - = c:{^- s � ` . ,/a •..- ! / /' J , - •ar- 'e^r•' £ s' 4FG<. £ N k K �Y• "S3 I :,.:2 .. •:et . '.\:'•.\ •:. .' '., . r :er,.:::. � : ._ - __- � . 'el. ',e'£ ! •/: - . , • ...�:: > . .• 4•x. r.Fp, ,.:s3 " - ,... >. .: .: ..: .. •.•_ :.. _ _ _- - - t' Ez» ;� ,, ; /. / >' /. / / / .. `�`�dz�.••-F s,' ' zgi3 .S x .f_ 2 -E�. .� t'\ _ _ __ __ a� "� 4 > , F> to :/. / J i ^ � M � y '. • , ,��... at } . 1:; t-- 'h2i#. - ' ! ]: L •.�3 ss'� •c: r3r -i•� ' J I 1 1 ! = / 1 1 '� �S. -'' x .cat -• "•:;t i > f u a .'•: 3 .� .a' . � . � _ _ _ c •`i 1, �'� ,' .ct.. .::s `c:r'. �s 4 'f u> m.r _ :.a :3:z f•: r :4' �F`•< _ . .. 3 r' - ' 4 :. � \,:;:\ .. ..: :.•e:..:::.:.. i.:.r•:.:.. .:. _: .:..s. ::.'. i _ .t� rs S t•.FF «. 4 : ... :: • "::.....,:: .... »..._.. c - a,`w';]e'; - ," .;x. /. / / / 1 t s %i •. ^•'S:'= 'rz[gy.. ra ♦ . _ \. .. ` y , _ - - y. / �n - / / / / I / 1 z i </i. � � 5�, t� IL p3 s tom ie 1 - a ! 1 b Tf f s v:. \ "N . a> ty six . ''�it�i" ,-�, �-"_ - . - , - y �%-. � / / / / /• / ` � / / / - ` J \ \ \ �� a1'>`.. � � >•- i '.y:t c: ai].N,'t'.tr]sh x Si �.,.' • - .. _ _ __ _ r. '- / / • - \ \ / / / � ��' i> '>_'i �' �,a✓, -° may; ., .` .. ' / " / / ! \ / ! \ \ \ ♦ �� L ,:.mud Si G . $j '. 3��t_:z�- . �'�^ ..:.��. 4 /_! ' // / � f - ,, I / ' \ - ,�„��:� <t �� w'I �f.,]^.�• a . ? `,�r S` " / :/. ' ter / ,/.. // / t \ \ C. :'•c•'1 f ..Sai ::i>.•i ii {$ ,�' 7' ;�<`}y� , �,'L>': • ;� ` � ..:� `•� / z/ 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ \ \ ` i�:3 -�-` r' i X14 I ' t `'t ?I - _ - - .__ _-- _---- - -__•_ \ \ � `! I - _ - ._ - _ - _- - _- - - -- _ - _ - _ - _ - _--__ - _.-------- \: < _, ^Y. }'• ► _ _ _ - _- _ - -_ -_ - _ -- _.� __ -_ _- _ _ - -- _. _ _- _ _ _ _ - _ _ __- 7 1 - - -- � -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - 4 1 / /�^,/ ti.. ..,ss • •.«.a 1'L: h�.'xe- 3:'- _>'•'' - tw"'. A ;; _ - \ / / ,f,,,p.... . "••Yr]i..•_ ^GSrr"'8 G ' ?...�Y`:..nc. - -- / I / / / / ``'; :t ,f, s =i 5 .,,, .�F�r�.w � �,J \ \ '1 / � � / / / i / •�?� �•.se.,. -e / / � ' / / :.'�� � , :''�- "''`'� m'�''.'�i.S� »� - - `YY •f•F� � �i'� fwt� 1 I \ _ - - � / L.�'.'`. `i�`�2 x 3 �ts 1 1 .Ge= .o. "ff ' _Tx: x......_. -_ •^..'i:L� - x a- _ �-..s_ xa:c •SC.N'� ...<, "']� � . e � � ��c.:""`- �.•,u <s- r<- L._. ...��" 4'' •, �'�' � �., •:t'<Y,$ .` ' , r,'�, , i ''f-,i<'� "�.• _ o ,�° » i y s, "' 'cs •met r 1 1 / f i / / / / / i *:.."'.., i + , / ."'" _.-._ .. f: t _ - .. _ "fit ° .t :. t:i.,t"�sv . S"; <�:� • :v: -.,: :: ., - <' .. _ _.. .ri .• a `. z-. ' 4'p. r 1 / i i .nw z:•> ^ 7�z ?:.� W ._ i'b 'yam a•.. ate" _ [t •'f3� «r s . - ,'xr i _ / / / / / / / •,• s ,,'^4;4�. -_. ... mu :. >'Ix ' ra<- ;r.�•` s,. '� «<`xyt- -•i`� .,x> > i ti•,L, _ c ;S l / / / / / / / Tse•; ye-•Z 6: �? r ?N, ] - "` {,,.., "v - E x.. •sL £' - 1 1 ! / ! / / / / zXy • ;r;;' = �r...;f > '>3 >i / . �sZ .�sa ^ �'�:roi.•O��cy, py y ' t ], .f>3ti.<a .• ?,, "�.' � •..aF' - 3 '�„ ^e '4�� S'""- '�m_.a .."c"3 ,} ! firer. •t si::•>4 1••'i;e r .._ , :£i^ ....95�. y' may? _ "'"`•�•<•: _ ;S`�' - >� / x . •s . a:.v...as• .. yes:] -:. :. -� -,,. - `e srRkle:.00r• . x• , y .LT •[T ( ! sat •r_• . 5 3�7, "''`'" 'r.. = a' '�]'>`'. -]mss• y. u ' t /� - :r,r,:•N "•L ,�',= - q - r .a - 't 7 -+2 W'. -y ^ � lsS - •'s"r.'..y'trrn-c:>�2� •+«` . / 1 �a Y.� c ,- . ,. ..« " ,. "....» ...:r ,� .,.. _ " ice......_ • v:K 4 f / I / / t. •'\,,. / i 1 Y _- �-'c z_-:: ' '': u}••.z V�� - �"k. �".��" _ � ^�"`�n - .•i.'f't_`,�;_�:s: �" " . _ - = ^4kS - :i�� J / / a � ?_: �- i \ _ _ xr- .•'� Lr.ec,- }^.. =3f3:_ `. % _ < ..e .. '`y\, '` T*^._ - ev. - ! / / t Y .'SY�/Y>..� R"��'•s. ( \a.. Ffsi:iY< ' ^rje "":_ 's•.::a .r "`•• _ 3 - xi" _ ...z =� - c = �'�- '�' 'raiz^' wtv:ri• --•T ,. _ �.. I J / / / / 3 ' . ` < a v..s.�,.y;•; xxr' / _ $x .:T <aF".'__4:r.]'•:. �S cxE�.�e...� .. ,....e. ' �y� ^� c n�'+:rxar ;,, _ • s;, .L xc :,r'- '`�- '-^at l az �.. e."„ t:. r J I / "'`>�• - T N. ` \ M t .:.3x %�s. �,y L: Y.,�:a. ��',�,:�, 4� S'n' .�•, c _ `J�S4ti 1 t 4 ... _ � � 3s,•,].x*- � ^_'ts:Y'> y:��E �' 2• Z..2.••[ -+�_-' :x ,.t� ` . Y. -.TY -te r_ . _ , Gxs~,'� .. . ! / A.-ro[a µµ,,,, �L�_ _ '�•x- / / � z: L:. `> Z ^ .�_ - - ,"x_.:•• "' - . • .f4- � �'^." >•.' .._ •t`•'. -' �tt< w =�b�LA I ! 'r>'+t'�•r� t i ^ix .��.� Tti75- 's- _-a,_.�-. -- : , vi. .:oa t`-- s'''..'.:^t �Y-,. s ♦ ! �/ / xsc'L'•`,, ( ••'••- a�- ° :r•"..- �- r*"�Me�3'�.;ft•'» -e �••�: <_ -_ : Gasz>z"- <r�"T;,�tw'n��y?''Y°.,. - K^':]'�c: <;?:- �•F•�t•xs• -.. ra_ 7sr. �w.• •::.< �i:r- � ^::•L'Har'�,�!� f � .s<.>xar. -� 3 'a`[i,,:• "= :s•5' >•t•:.ti ='' -n. . .r -r+ i. - � •^5: ''x .sy .:+x•Ta -.- � 3•-�>.s -�ao :zc<-+f��; / / / / �` ''[4+c�3''. s, -, rs.••- ++[.+• _�: � -_ t >- ��?' c: �': s;:; ca �'- w �..x ix '' . '"` -- :A.^`t_ zr��'"n,,..� --•.». _ e''", --.^. ..r _ x�, .�;. -z,t. •x` ='7, �,�c�� ��'.: I / / / 1. a „ - atia?2�,-^tr:s« - _ :xa ::_.c•_c`x_ 3. _ • a.. zr ?a"tc•= , sf 'n"z I / ! ! rs'. 4S t ( iy= ` _g�• nFe7_ Vii.. :3.+Z ^ y' r Y •^•-_ -t" �:- iC•:aL 1 .- � rw' t .�i[,L',• -,< : >�'.»"_.- 1 / I f.. _ .'Y•,.i /,_ ,..4.f>- �`<•.� � ..J�_ . >S T' ^j G: i t,, • _,\,' 'w�._ - " l � � '. • / ,�:. ::» 3 - wY• - ::. �' ufr- :e�_ = >• . : :�:••ee:•ns'�' - k.>.. - fir . ^ _. St " �::>_[•+zra _ _ _ _ i f ! : ^ _ , `.._ _ ^-L x- .:'�:Y- r._ arm <+i: - ..�' - x r. [ � oa'� _ _ '�<` = SS��•. Y ��. t 1 ! / / i.?c,::: <.' � �- t..s h _,_.. - '-- ✓..,, - <>, x513 � ;. v ... < . _ . L;•�^w- , a,�:�:a:�= f:. -•�: - � - b• - .. >•�•<di"aa•.c,',�" �-- �,,,i•-'-`�'•.'a'�r-.:>..�'>< .::. ,a; 'i•ZL :'� �3 l - -•• _ 4•• < ;:= , .. v-._'" ..� >•�:.;- •L^ a�iirh <'k'"";/ x T / / ._ c- [.;;ice t ;: 1 • - - i .. > 3 a 3 __ t r c x.:S x ! / I Ya• ssa r. Y. r : L. - <:xr�r �,<� a".,`� = ?�: ; - _ �, , __ _��..s :.:_w::. "'��: • fru:_• 3 :. , i;�:: -- f { - ,a:. -:v:= :.�i ^_a,.. _•>1- ::rr•• ••- >c.•.: '. - ..:f ��s�r.L: :: = � ::r T:� �� ___ ...�`� •:':sf<. �' J .- :M.c.�= �s..:_;.���- ':;s:r.:�? 4 :z { 4, <;vtt ,/. u2• F--• vs>. 'E3[.r_•?z- ccr•L :'t..- '.' -:-aa `• 7c : »ti,'� �[ `�,.?+s.a.;r.:'.`"Lt'a Y^'S:. �•yaY. / .- .�`],r:"``= ;,z.•.:>t.,:: 'f. E• '_'••2'' PEEN . :1)f Sa:^.„. sz. r•..r_. _^ i!?s / _,� :.o:,. = ` -`' a ^ n - �. ^>^ii�:: r]x .n..: - .' - ..R_ .�•_. .;y.te'e _. .,�• •['- yr "1<::!•aeoe -^, :r i:iryt '«£?ice Yz% n:�:-.:•-:- w-..,"�.:��;cY:• „l / / / 4:)/ _ .,::wc`:.�:=% <t-.; - � 3 '\.- a"�',.:_?- �xv.,_. .._ - :3' �:t ,.�.. • 1 - - - _• \ "•• >� . ; - } - .: - = •..x.•i �-_::.• _. . -_ .. r_"_w ^.>s.... ...__... �t:� a .,. - ::,::... �•� ems ...- , scc2'.c;_..' ��= :fc ! // _'"`•,..,.._ . ��^ �.. <.e .':.><,e: i . e•t_ _ t•..�e..'?n.�.3G -.s `9! -� : :.�'."-x°z.: •aqr ... La�'<:c .:.w p°.•::an -re,: y ='fr.. t s ."T l J I ! ,• • . 's=a:: , i ' :.s z -f �.. �e ! s • it��>:xsx, - •�� : --•i .u=�Y- "�"''� -- .L �,,. •••nn_�: «�,, 1 .e,....,.. ^cam ti I ,r..- tL...�, _....z...: =::Ct :z = �„t -•-. ..5 _... �;vi.. <]a =.... _ ., .+4]: , „st1 • cw,?;: '" E n:.ir / t^,\, - z-= 1 t- :..`�, > " �' f _ L ?_ _,x'•`:<^ ti5•; - , :- =' -- a:•cz.:.�a'x":.Se.�i- �_c�.v'�:t ...r f -t. - ^•-]�,.?' :' -r:_ •>cta`•- • -,x�`= J ! a,•.r, >G^ r..'ta,.. ^.: ?r :.°Sca.'•' ?ii2 <s.+.r -) ^3r _••c ;:.. ^t a`w_•'•__'.e.•]:^L:,_ _�"vS'F:- �i. °_''7 ` s 3 Si\w:, -: '� 9::s f ^ •] 1 _ c _ .._ >� __ �....... _ >: }:. •..: fart _ b s"�S - r. : `� - 1 : YC .,. x:.._..c•...:,ri - 't_'- >•ar- <. -t=:1 •-.:x>� _. vs ; �,,,��Y _. =?) ._ . sL•.xe / - -x x_ 't 33" r..t •s::: -- " _�• .�_.. - c. ^ •, - s . �. vza`i4•' __� .. r _x . n > ti:�_•- ♦ f l '�a - �- - _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ - . .y Pik _.:,.._••n::_. _ mac ] '. - .. : ��•x: - • , MS:_- <xy, c<x-i:i, -..- y-__ I£ Y - '. •s,_.r •: _.. _..»ice: J :L1 .• ,!, _ x"*'.=' " C�..:_^aGL^'i:._,iiti. _ _ _ _ to -> x_,t,- +N`. --' n_ ?:;".tC•'•' x <��;'�£- i•ILJ' u -'_`•:v ' �. _r-•� / - - - - - - - _ - - - - i�� . vim ^'rs= . i:Xr - ... .r..e,,••' -.. ._,•c .,S-3: ....<tc.� G ,_,r- •`: _ f ..z .�c ?,..K_h'�a-. _ - :c+'u:vw:c�r•.. -;_ �:u a- '',::. >�c_,.. t• s ..c•i- _ _ ;_.ii.".�:`J / / l / 4 / • (. ? :t - \:- t'_...•:e� »:>,..- :r._: -••.,_ .. �•'t.::Y:'-' E . _'xi»• ><'7L -• s t_ - .::.s�.�^. �•c :i!M„�: f I 4 z x �,..:t...nz� �w.> -�=c.. = ti.•`Y =:' �X. _.. _, t?:.' >1:.ve• Y '• % .�>.,.'s.:_ =.. � - ^_< - -' ( �:iirx= ?;s:'.'K -•:r - .ckzyt ts_'••Aiu,: «?_ -.-+: fi .e. ^F^: is_ss: a •s = •: <�.'. :a-: v : c',. f l / r 1 >2- - .s:_c.•- •x-:x- •-��., .3� _�. -_'� Ly - ?_v � :. �.� ` L ' =:�::' ••- r -- =`'�`' {ff f ''� c - � •' �..� -.s 4 i� __ = w :it:x x.4- : '>' __`r =_'4 'v L� � ': '`` -.tsx- 4 % "� -,i _s.• _ r.: =z�ya. '';;'`• =_ - +.,::fr i f 1 f r?`. c . r �•t s 1 .�'_- -^•'ice ��E : -_ 3' �.>>:_: » `-.t• , ^ V - - :`- a.• I / r x 4 1 i Z:>:, 6 .•..<...:' 34-,^_. � xs= a• = :t?�•_•-= ''.rr-`.<' = �>w;= = :.;` - = i' $_- ;v ' �'?_;H C;.. "� ' =• ' ::.: _= z:•t�:_ I _ .. •>..3.. f t � ^.t::cygt�; rs :}' - -- ••• ,=_• • , �'igsr.- ter' -rc;M �cc>•- �i- y.:,`%_._. :�x_v.��>•'L�G" -� 7 I Il J l ..::^'� - r •..:]=, = -.- �•c<i:�. >>e,::-= � •..:_c =':: -':tip^ = =�s`2_:i a�:�'°'Hz' - : •i'!'�•••� -E i _ f'1 �: - i 1?: - - '- t- ;.:.cv.:: _ 3: fx•. _ = ,.r ~�= �:l � - cc_:•^:_• i `,`.`c: �L_...::ra�,g - s, c�: v . • „`"'`�i _->r.. l / r :- :. -`_ . ,.:L = _ _ ._;• _ _ : �...i'ri'.- c:.n}- i- ..•^ ?a. _ / / - �• ;iio� _r .k. :� 1 :•�-. ,tz _ _ ;:+ r, :• T.£s.:• - .:�t:..- ;;.. - �.'rsfc> :i :..^•'e = - ..._.•'?'>e3a�, •.� e...r.c -" =r _ S J ! ! r z•.T^ - __ - - 1 - ' - ♦ - ,: _:�- _ ->c:'. Vii," = x`''E�:u - .::�:f -n'.; :�w:x��: ^v:v� r z -..f Y i:i•.i .. ` 1 Lam. _ __ -t ��.. _-._ _ _ _ _ _ »�:'•~' - - - -_ _.T / f:. .- i P o t �... { Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council Date: 3/24/2003 Re: Maplewood Sales Tax Option A Rem # K�I , r dossed Modified Rejected a 1 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO COLLECT A SALES TAX FOR CITY REHABILITATION AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is home to a regional shopping mall and 3M headquarters which draw tens . of thousands of people each day to the City roadways, and Y s Y� WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood's road system is over- utilized and is beginning to g g fail rapidly in and around regional centers, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has several scattered economically stressed sites in the City, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is practicing infill development and redevelopment using models established by the Metropolitan Council, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has several regional parks and open spaces in need of development and restoration, and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood does not have the financial resources to meet the park, development, redevelopment and transportation needs of both the City nd the surrounding g region, and WHEREAS, promised State Aid funding sources are being completely eliminated, and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that it is in the best interests of the City and the citizens and the businesses of Maplewood to request the Minnesota Legislature to rant the Cit y the authority to conduct a referendum to allow it to impose an additional one -half of one p ercent sales and use tax to provide it with the means to pay for the needed projects. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood Minnesota as follow: 1. The City Council hereby requests that the Minnesota Legislature grant the Ci t 'of Maplewood the authority to conduct a referendum to allow it to impose an additional one -half of one percent sales and use tax to provide it with the funds to pay for the following projects: a. Construction of road improvements on regionally significant collector streets throughout the City. b. Redevelopment of blighted commercial and housing areas throughout the city. c. Restoration of natural vegetation and environment in designated regional open spaces purchased by the City pursuant to an Open Space referendum approved by the voters in 1993. d. Development and upgrades of regional park facilities to meet growing demands. 2. The City expects that the total amount to be raised before the tax would expire would not exceed thirty million dollars ($30,000,000) and it is expected the tax would be in effect for 15 years. AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE: DATE: Finance Director )eR64� Action by Council Date . Endorsed Modified Rejected 1 2003 BUDGET CHANGES FOR STATE AID REDUCTIONS March 20, 2003 BACKGROUND The 2003 Budget included an additional property tax levy of $317,270 t p Y Y o finance anticipated state aid reductions. In December a contingency Ian was prepared t . ,, g Y p p p o deal with a worst -case scenario of additional state aid reductions totaling T g he plan identified 26 expenditure items that would be eliminated from the budget to compensate mpensate for the possible additional state aid reductions. The governor's budget proposal includes state aid reductions of 938 740. Part art of the reduction can be financed by the property tax levy f $317,270 but additions Y I budget changes totaling $621,470 are needed. The management team has identified 14 expenditure items in the December contingency tangency plan that could be cut from the 2003 Budget to offset the state aid reductions. The ' These items are identified in the attached listing. It is difficult to predict when the legislature will approve a bill regarding state aid reductions. g g uct�ons. i However, t seems likely that the state aid reductions will be close to the o ' g vernors proposal. Council approval of budget changes at this time would eliminate the "hold" on other expenditure items in the contingency plan so that these items can be urch p ased . RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve 2003 expenditure reductions for 1 . p 4 items identified by the management team and the appropriate bud et changes that g g at are necessary due to anticipated state aid reductions of $938,740. P \agn \2003aidcuts.doc 2003 BUDGET - POSSIBLE STATE AID CUTS 717,300 Local Government Aid 748,562 Market Value Homestead Credit Aid 1,465,862 Total 2003 BUDGET CUTS THAT MAY BE NEEDED 1,465,862 Total state aid vulnerable (317,270) Additional property taxes levied 1,148,592 Net amount needed PROPOSED PURCHASES IN 2003 BUDGET TO BE DELAYED GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL 717,300 Local Government Aid 221,444 Market Value Homestead Credit Aid 938,744 Total (317,270) Additional property taxes levied 621,474 Net amount needed PROPOSED PURCHASES . . ............ .. ...... ......................................................................................... ............................... B BUDGET TO E CUT b t . .................... 65 000 Securit .....s.. stem at fire :...::......... . ........ . r 5 5,000 SCBA com ressors .............. 50 k im . ..... ......................... ::::::::::::::: p .......... ... 50,000 City - C:IEXCELIBUDGET12003 BUDGET CUTS City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes. Public Hearing Schmelz Countryside VW /Saab Ex ansion 0 1180 Highwa 36) Date March 31, 2003 Time 7:00 P.M. Name (first &last) - please print I. h)u-.-Lj,0q 1�'�. WLL 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Address "rte c 14. City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes. Public Hearing: LeRacv Village of Maplewood City Project 02 -18 Date March 31, 2003 Time 7:15 P.M. Name (first &last) - please print V2. - 5. 6. �/j. rtL �0- TS�3Ftc Ff � 90 �t�Vi l�Yv e c 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Address Id,9 e 7,�o3'4 1 cLtktov 9,53 L+, i � E. / X537 rtie���� City of Maplewood Official Sign -Up Sheet. By putting your name and address on this sheet, you are requesting to address the Maplewood City Council on the following topic for up to five minutes Public Hearing: Count Road D Reali ent Cit P Date March 31 2003 r� ect 02 -07- and 02 -08 Time �:2oP.lvr. Address "'-0 / C-T-1 0 /J A I/ I..' 3os�� 11ci7 nL w,�n� J6 m4r ocvoo M)4) � >io7 County Road D .Realignment Project. Environmental Assessment "Worksheet Finding of Fact Regarding Decision on Need for an Environmental Impact Statement March 31, 2003 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Maplewood proposes to realign approximately one mile of CR D between Hazelwood Avenue to just west of TH 61 (Figure 3). The Project includes a 4 -lane roadway section with dedicated turn lanes at major intersections east of TH 61, and a 2 -lane roadway section west of TH 61. Both sections would also include an 8 -foot trail along the south side of the new roadway, which is part of the Lake Links Network Master Plan known as the Lake Links Trail. A new intersection of CR D and TH 61 would be relocated approximately 900 feet. south of the existing intersection, and will provide full access with a signalized intersection. The existing intersection currently has right -in, right -out and a left turn from northbound TH 61 to west CR D. All other turning movements are not allowed. The left turn access will be closed and a median constructed in the center of TH 61. All utility services are sufficient to support the proposed Project. Water, sanitary and storm sewers will be built beneath the roadway and connected to existing systems. Three storm water ponds and one mechanical device will be implemented to accommodate additional runoff caused by the Project. The ponds may also serve as partial mitigation for the 2.43 acres of existing wetland that will be impacted by the Project. The proposed alignment crosses rail owned by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad and leased by Minnesota Commercial Railroad. This Project will cut out a portion of the railroad embankment to cross at- grade. At some point in the future a pedestrian bridge will likely be constructed across the new roadway following the rail corridor. The sole purpose of the remaining portion of the rail corridor north of Beam Avenue is to serve the Xcel Energy substation located adjacent to the west side of the track. The track is used in the event a large transformer needs to be replaced, which has only been necessary twice in the past 30 years. It is presumed that transformer hauling could be accomplished on local roads under permit. If so, the realignment of CR D could be carried out without any realignment of the rail spur to the Xcel substation. Both Ramsey County Parks and Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA) are interested in the potential abandonment of the . rail corridor north of Beam Avenue in the Project area. Currently, the Bruce Vento Trail extends from St. Paul to Beam Avenue in Maplewood along abandoned rail bed. It connects with the State Gateway Trail at Frost Avenue in County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 1 Maplewood, south of the Project area. The Gateway Trail begins. in St. Paul and travels approximately 1.8 mules northeast to the endpoint five mules north of Stillwater. There is interest in extending g proposed the Bruce Vento Trail through the ro osed Project area to as far north as White Bear Lake. The trail would o over the proposed realignment of CR D. Ramsey, County is p p interested in owning the remaining rail corridor to make this extension, which would connect to the State Gateway proposed Trail and the Lake Links Trail as part of the regional trail system.. p The RCRRA owns the abandoned rail corridor south of Beam Avenue and plans to purchase the remainin g g rail right-of-way north of Beam Avenue when. it is eventually abandoned. They would use the corridor for future public transit purposes along with the regional trail. Construction of the o osed realignment would occur in phases. Most likely the eastern section p p g (Hazelwood Avenue to TH 61) will be built first. It is anticipated that construction of the eastern section would be Y completed b the end of 2004. Construction of the western section would be timed in accordance with development being planned for adjacent parcels. (ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS The Cit y p project proposer of Maplewood is the 'ect for the CR D Realignment Project and has made p application for various permits and approvals related to the Project. The Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for the Project is also the City of Maplewood. The County Road D Realign . men't Project Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed at the discretion of the City of Maplewood. The length of the Prod ect met thresholds that require mandatory preparation of an EAW under Minnesota Rules 441 0.4300, subpart 22A. The EAW was submitted to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on January 27, 2003. The EAW Notice of Availability was published in the Minnesota EQB Monitor on February 3, 2003. Copies of the EAW were mailed to all, of the agencies and organizations on the EQB official EAW distribution list, the local libraries,- as well as representatives of other interested agencies. On February 4, 2003, information on the Project was provided in a press release to the Maplewood Review newspaper along with other required information under _ • . Minnesota Rule 4410.1500 Subp. B. The 30 -day review and comment period ended on March 5, 2003. CORRECTIONS CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO THE EAW A number of minor edits should be noted in the EAW in the following locations: • Page 2 — It should be clarified that the Lake Links Trail is not currently identified as a regional trail, but will connect to regional trails in the area. • Page 19 Construction Noise — Daylight, working hours should read 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, consistent with City Ordinance. • Figure 5 — Blue lines on this figure should be .identified as County Ditch, not streams. i County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 2 COMMENTS ON THE EAW During the EAW comment period, letters of comment were received from the following agencies, organizations, and individuals: A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources B. Minnesota Department of Transportation C. Metropolitan Council D. Minnesota Historical Society — State Historic Preservation Office E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District F. Gerald and Linda Peterson G. George and Kathy Supan H. Steve Martinson I. Scott Milton J. Joseph Wegner K. Cindy Kranz All comment letters received are included in Attachment 1. The substantive comments stated in each letter are outlined below along with a corresponding response. Verbal comments on the EAW were received from the Maplewood City Council Meeting on January 27, 2003 and the Maplewood Planning Commission meeting held on March 3, 2003. These comments and the responses given are documented in items L and M below. Note: "The City" in each of the following responses refers to the City of Maplewood. A. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment Al: The Division of Trails and Waterways expressed appreciation for attention paid to the local trails network, with the Lake Links Trail segment included as part of the road project and consideration of a grade - separated crossing for the future expansion of the BN/Bruce Vento Regional Trail. Ramsey County is the lead contact for both trail projects. Please contact Ramsey County's Greg Mack for additional consultation. Response Al: The City has been and will continue to coordinate with Burlington Northern and Ramsey County (Greg Mack) on the abandonment of the rail corridor for the Bruce Vento Trail. Final design will reflect accommodation for future construction of a pedestrian bridge over the roadway. B. Minnesota Department of Transportation Comment BE The stopping sight distance from the south may be a concern. It may be slightly limited by the existing crest vertical curve on TH 61. County Road D Realignment Project Finding of Fact 031'26/03 Page 3 l Response BI: Even assuming the worst case the sight triangle does not cross the existing building. There may be restrictions of where the parking may occur on the Venber g Tire parcel to ensure stopping sight distance. This limitation, if necessary, will be finalized during the final design process of the roadway. Comment B2: Mn/DOT has access control along TH 61 in the location of the new CR D alignment. The new road will need a new access opening and the old access will need to be closed with access control when the project is further developed. Response B2: The City will work with Mn/DOT to accommodate the necessary access control changes. Comment B3: Mn/DOT ermits will be required for the project. Any use of or work within p Mn/DOT right-of-way requires a permit. Project plans will need to be submitted when the p roject is further along. A signal justification report (SJR) will be required for the new signal at Beam Avenue. Response B3: Mn/DOT permits /approvals, including plan review, the right-of- Y p on report, are way permit, and Signal Justification listed in Table 1 of the EAW document as permits required for the project. The City will submit appropriate documents during the final design phase of the Project. Comment B4: This p roj ect should be phased such that the closure of "old" CR D (median opening and right - in/right -out on the west side of TH 61) takes place in advance p g of or simultaneously to the relocation of CR D. Reasons for this include: • the existing 3 /4 intersection at CR D and TH 61 does not meet Mn/DOT access management guidelines. *;The project will result in an increase in traffic volume at the I -694 interchange • There is currently a higher than expected number of rear end collisions involving right turning vehicles at the eastbound I -694 ramp to SB TH 61 • In anticipation of the traffic volume increase from this project and the closure of CR D west of TH 61, Mn/DOT is planning to install a southbound acceleration lane on TH 61 for vehicles turning right off of the eastbound I- 694 ramp. This installation cannot take place without the closure of CR D west of TH 61. Response B4: The City will work with Mn/DOT to accommodate any closures necessary. Comment B5: The right- in/right -out intersection at CR D on the east side of TH 61 does not meet Mn/DOT access management guidelines. This is the only public street serving the properties to the east of TH 61, so a right - in/right -out will be allowed. However, if the "old" connection of CR D through to White Bear is ever restored, we will investigate the closure of this access due to the proximity to the I -694 ramps. Realignment Project County Road � g � ect 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 4 Response B5: The City will continue to work with Mn/DOT on access management at the existing CR D intersection with TH 61. C. Metropolitan Council Comment Cl: Given the number and extent of existing and proposed mitigation wetlands on the site, and the understanding that Blanding's Turtles are known to travel up to one mile from wetland feeding areas to upland nesting areas, it is quite possible that they may traverse portions of this proposed roadway. Council staff recommends considering the utilization of surmountable curbing for the proposed roadway reconstruction project, in lieu of the designs presented in Figure 4. Response Cl: Ditches or curbs that are negotiable to turtles are also a recommendation of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. As part of final design, the City will consider the most appropriate curb treatment. The City may also consider building a portion of the road as a rural section (no curb and gutter) in response to poor soil conditions. Comment C2: The EAW states that the proposed eight -foot trail on the south side of a realigned CR D would be known as the Lake Links Regional Trail. This trail is actually proposed to be a local trail. It was studied as a part of the Lake Links Trail Network Master Plan. The EAW describes the trail as interim. It is understood that trails are a part of the transportation infrastructure and that it will continue to be accommodated in some manner, if and when the corridor is used for additional transportation uses. Response to C2: The EAW identified the Lake Links Trail as a regional trail. It was intended to be described that the Lake Links Trail, as part of the Network Master Plan, would provide local access to regional trail systems in the area. This section of the Lake Links Trail will be permanently maintained by the City for pedestrian use. The interim trail use discussed in the EAW was in reference to the Bruce Vento Trail. It should be correctly stated that the Bruce Vento Trail will accommodate trail /pedestrian uses as well as potential future transit uses. Comment C3: As the proposed project map depicts an intersection of the future segment of the Bruce Vento Trail and CR D, the City and the County need to work together to ensure the State Regional Parks System is appropriately accommodated. Response to C3: The City has been coordinating with Burlington Northern and Ramsey County (Greg Mack) on the conversion of the rail corridor to an extension of the Bruce Vento Trail. The final CR D design will accommodate for future construction of a pedestrian bridge over the roadway. County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 5 D. Minnesota Historical Society —.State Historical Preservation Office Comment D1: The review submittal includes a chart of fourteen inventoried properties, along with a statement that they are outside the area of direct impact. It is not clear whether they lie within the APE [Area of Potential Effect] as far as indirect impacts are concerned. If they do, further evaluation may be needed. Response Dl: The need for this additional cultural resource work. is triggered by the federal permit required for wetlands in the Project area. The additional evaluation required will be prepared during the permit process. The City will coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to define the APE and potential indirect impacts after the alignment has been refined. Comment D2: The section of the Northern Pacific Railroad in the area is cited as having a high degree of integrity. The effects of the project on this property need to be '! assessed.. Response D2: As described above in Response D 1, this additional evaluation is triggered by the federal permit. The City will coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to determine the study area for the assessment of potential rail corridor impacts. E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District Comment E1: As you have indicated, the project would require a permit from the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean water Act. Please submit the appropriate application package when the plans are sufficiently developed so our office can make a final determination on the need for a Corps permit. Any application should clearly address wetland impacts and alternative measures that have been considered to avoid and minimize those impacts. A discussion of wetland mitigation/replacement should also be included in the application. Response E1: As indicated in Table 1 of the EAw, a Section 404 permit application will be filed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. F. Gerald and Linda Peterson Comment F1: I would like to see the wetland mitigation area by the corner of Hazelwood and CR D to be smaller. Also what type of wetland? Looks more like a storm basin. Response F1: At this time, the wetland mitigation plan is conceptual only. A more detailed plan will be developed as part of final design and the wetland permit application process. The replacement wetland would be of similar type to what is being impacted by the project (Type 1 and 2). Comment F2: The end of Hazelwood shows storm drains in the road, Hazelwood's water runs off to the sides, it should not have anything to prevent that. I believe the wetland County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 6 1 mitigation area at the end of Hazelwood is higher than the road. Is the water to be pumped up or is there going to be a big hole? It is close to the home. Could be a possible hazard to the children. Keep it closer to where it is being moved from. Response F2: The regional storm water management plan being prepared for this area by the city includes the collection and treatment of runoff from Hazelwood, CR D and planned future development. The specific methods - for collection and location of treatment ponds is being evaluated. Location and design of treatment facilities will incorporate safety considerations. As noted in response E 1, the wetland mitigation areas shown in the EAW are conceptual. Details of the location, size and grading plans will be provided in the required permit applications to be submitted once final designs are complete. It is expected that construction of wetland mitigation areas will be accomplished via excavation. No pumping of runoff is planned. Comment F3: I also did not see any information about pest control and smell due to the .increased ponds and wetlands. Response F3: Proper management of natural areas should not increase the likelihood of mosquito or pest problems over those currently experienced by area residents. Comment F4: Hours of work should read 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM Monday through Saturday. Response F4: The_ hours of work should read 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM as stated. Article III of the Maplewood Zoning Code does state 7:OOPM to 7:OOAM Monday through Saturday, and all day Sunday, as the hours when general prohibition of noise should occur. This also applies to construction activities. Sec. 19 -48b states: The city manager, or his or her designee, may waive this requirement where the activity would not cause a nuisance and where the proposed activity would not be within 350 feet of a residential use. The city manager's decision may be appealed to the city council. A waiver within 350 feet of a residential use must be approved by the city council. The property owners within 350 feet of the proposed activity shall be notified of the waiver request at least 10 days before the council meeting. A nuisance is described as ... any distinctly and loudly audible noise that unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety or welfare of any person or precludes their enjoyment of property or affects their property's value County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 7 Construction activities associated with the CR D project would 1 adhere to the hours outlined in the ordinance, and/or would follow the established process for any exceptions to the ordinance. G. George and Kathy Supan Comment G1: The area identified as wetland mitigation east of the Hazelwood and CR D intersection should . be moved to the north and east of the proposed area. There needs to be more distance between the homes and the wetland area. The land toda y pp does not support wetland in that area and it's hard to believe that wetlands should be created that close to residential property. Response G1: See Responses F1 and F2. Comment G2: I did not see anything about care for the ponds and wetland. Such as mosquito control, smell and grasses in or around the wetland. With the recent spread of diseases carried by mosquitoes like the West Nile Disease a wetland area should not be laced near the current homes on Hazelwood Street. Who will control the p mosquitoes and pests in and around the proposed ponds and wetland areas? If the realignment of CR D requires more ponds and wetland, treatment of them should- also be required. Response G2: See Response F3. Comment G3: In the AUAR there were studies indicating that the noise levels were already high in the area south of CR D. The proposed residential buildings in the Legacy of Maplewood site will have special care given to windows and insulation to reduce the noise. The realignment of CR D will bring the traffic closer to the residences on the east side of Hazelwood Street. What compensation will there be to the homeowners to reduce the noise level in their homes? .Response G3: The AUAR does state that noise insulation would be installed in new units in the proposed development. The AUAR also states that existing noise from I -694 surpasses the potential noise from the development project. The insulation is not required and is being done at the discretion of the developer, in brand new homes. It is being done to offset the ambient noise that already exists in the area. There are no plans at this time to compensate existing homeowners as a result of the CR D project. Comment G4: The defined hours are from 7:OOAM to 10:00PM. I believe the AUAR had 7:OOAM to 7:OOPM, and is it not City Code to be 7:OOAM to 7:OOPM? Response G4: See Response F4. County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 8 Comment G5: I would ask that the residents along the east side of Hazelwood Street be advised in writing of the time lines and meetings for the CR D realignment project and EAW review. Response G5: The residents have been and currently are being notified of meetings. H. Steve Martinson Comment H1: There needs to be a shoulder on CR D west of TH 61. There , is a bus stop and considerable pedestrian traffic between TH 61 and Walter. An increase in traffic will cause safety issues if a shoulder is not added. There are mailboxes right along CR D west of TH 61 which is dangerous for mail carriers and residents as they get their mail. The mailboxes should be set back off the highway, or, adding a wider shoulder would help. Response H1: A closure of CR D at TH 61 will be reviewed with engineers from Ramsey County and Mn/DOT. Bus routes will also be rerouted and all safety issues reviewed and appropriately addressed. Comment H2: The intersection at Highridge Court and CR D is a blind intersection that will need to be addressed. Response H2: As part of the roadway realignment, the City would work with Ramsey County engineers to ensure safe access within the area. I. Scott Milton Comment I1: A stoplight at the intersection of TH 61 and CR D was previously looked at by the state highway department when the west area along TH 61 was proposed to be developed with an apartment complex. At that time the stoplight was not approved by the highway department because it would severely back up traffic along TH 61. Is this still a concern of the highway department or the city? Response i rrarwas - v sly evaluated at the -intersection of TH 6 and_ - existing CR D. Existing CR D is too close to the signalized I -694 interchange, and making vehicles stop for a signal would cause severe backups. Previous analysis did not include a realignment of CR D. As part of the traffic study for this Project, it was found that intersections along TH 61 would operate at a better Level of Service (LOS) with the new CR D intersection than without it. A signal at TH 61 and new CR D would not experience the same problems as the intersection of existing CR D. Mn/DOT will be consulted throughout the process, including a Signal Justification Report. Comment I2: From experience on driving this route, traffic can and does back up from CR C to k Beam going north and from I -694 to Beam going south during rush hour. County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 9 Addition of an extra intersection will make for greater gridlock along this route, similar to what happens along White Bear Avenue. And this is without the added traffic from the proposed development west of Maplewood Mall. Response I2: As part of this project, a traffic model was run for TH 61. The project was designed based on the results of this model. As designed, the project would relieve the traffic volumes at the Beam Avenue/TH 61 intersection, including the current problem - of southbound left turns onto Beam Avenue, by providing an alternate location for southbound traffic to turn left (at new CR D) to reach the Maplewood Mall and other destinations east of the Project area. The proposed CR D is located at an adequate distance between Beam Avenue and I -694 to minimize impacts. Comment I3: Would the implementation of this plan allow the area west of TH 61 to be developed with an apartment complex? The Kohlman neighborhood was strongly against this when it was previously brought before the Council. There is concern that this may allow the project to slip in without further review. Is the property west of TH 61 slated to have its zoning changed from commercial to high density residential as part of this realignment? Response I3: As part of the consideration of the final alignment, the Maplewood City Council may consider a land use change in the area west of TH 61. A land use study will be done as part of the final alignment. Any land use changes would require action to be taken at a public meeting of the Planning Commission and City Council, for which adjacent residents would be notified. J. Joseph Wegner Comment J1: With the car dealership expanding and some of the traffic changes that have been made at/around the current CR D, the traffic and speed of traffic on Walter Street has increased significantly. Anything the new plan can do to decompress the traffic flow on the local side streets will be greatly appreciated. Response J1: While Walter Street is not part of the traffic model for this project, it is expected that the signalized connection of new CR D with TH 61 would divert some traffic from Walter Street. Comment J2: Any plans for CR D west of TH 61 should include an option/mandate for non - local traffic to access the "new D" and have access to south and northbound TH 61. If the proposed changes do not include creating a northbound TH 61 option off of CR D, I would heartily suggest this. With the development of additional business on TH 61, no northbound TH 61 access from CR D, and further expansion of residential development on top of the hill behind Gulden' s, our street [Walter Street], at times, is a safety issue. A practical diversion of CR D with access to north and southbound TH 61 will help diminish unnecessary traffic to our neighborhood. County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 10 Response J2: At the intersection of existing CR D and TH 61, it is proposed that _ the median is closed and left -turn access is eliminated. The new intersection of CR D/TH 61 would be a full access intersection. New CR D would be part of the County State Aid system, therefore no restrictions are allowed. The road would be designed to accommodate all forms of traffic. Comment J3: If you are contemplating an additional traffic signal in the area of Gulden's, I would recommend observing the traffic flow on southbound TH 61 attempting to turn eastbound on Beam during the Christmas holidays. Response J3: See Response 12. Traffic modeling has shown that all traffic patterns will be improved. The City believes that traffic issues associated with the high number of turning movements directed toward the Maplewood Mall area during the holiday season will be improved with the realigned roadway and improvements at the Beam Avenue/TH 61 intersection. K. Cindy Kranz Comment Kl: I live on Highridge Court and had asked that the new road be located further east than you had proposed originally. I believe the City said "we could move the road further east." I am wondering if now that you are going to the next phase of study, the new study would in fact show the road to be further east than originally thought. After hearing the comments from the owner of the pet kennel, I think moving the proposed realignment east would also alleviate her concerns about accessibility to her place of business. Response K1: The City will complete a land use study as part of efforts to refine the roadway alignment west of TH 61, and will consider options to move the roadway east. The current schedule indicates that the City Council will review changes to the alignment at the City Council meeting on April 14, 2003, and has a final public hearing on the CR D plans on May 12, 2003. L. Maplewood City Council (verbal comments, January 27, 2003) Comment L1: Will wetland buffers be replaced as part of wetland mitigation? Response L1: The Maplewood City Ordinance states that any impacted wetland replaced at a 1 :1 ratio, and should have a minimum average buffer width, depending on wetland classification. The Project will comply with these requirements, and will provide buffer replacement in addition to the wetland mitigation that is required, where feasible. M. Maplewood Planning Commission (verbal comments, March 3, 2003) A Comment M1: Don't the six known occurrences of Blanding's turtles trigger specific mitigation? County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 11 Response MI: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) identified six known occurrences of rare species in the project area, five of which were Blandin g 's turtles. The sixth occurrence was the White Wild Indigo, which the DNR has stated is not anticipated to be affected by the proposed project. The DNR searches within a one -mile radius of a site, and has stated that the project area is not within a high priority area for Blanding's Turtles, but that potential turtle habitat could be affected by construction activities. The DNR provided a list of recommended mitigation measures for the project, which are included as Attachment 2. The DNR directed that the first list of recommendations to prevent harm to turtles during construction work be considered for this project. This list will be followed as much as is feasible during project construction. Comment M2: Why would it be in the City's interest to reclassify Wetland A (location west of TH 61)? [to downgrade from a "Protect" classification] Response M2: The wetland has been degraded and silted in, and may no longer meet criteria for a protect classification. Classification information is derived from old maps and aerial photos and is not field- checked. Staff will go on -site to determine if the wetland actually meets its classification criteria. There is also a possibility that this wetland could be avoided or reduced through design refinements of the western portion of the roadway. It is important to have the appropriate and correct classification of the wetland to ensure that proper mitigation is identified. Comment M3: In one place it says all runoff will be handled by ponds, and in another it references storm sewer capture. Response M3: See Response F2. Comment M4: Is it possible to begin conversations with Mn/DOT now about the interchange of TH 61/694? Response M4: Mn/DOT has been a part of the planning process, through coordination with the traffic study and alignment study. This coordination will continue through this process and for other improvements in the area. FINDINGS OF FACT / DECISION ON NEED FOR EIS Minnesota Rule 4410.1700, Subp. 7, specifies the following criteria to be used in deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effect. • Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects. • Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 12 • The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority, and • The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as -a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. Based on the information contained in the EAW, comments received on the EAW, and responses to those comments and the criteria listed above, the City of Maplewood, as the RGU, makes the following determinations: 1. Type, extent and reversibility on impacts. The Project does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW and the Finding of Fact summarize the type and extent of impacts to the natural environment. Alternatives to avoid potential impacts on the natural environment were considered and were evaluated prior to the preparation of the EAW. The proposed project is compatible with surrounding development and is in compliance with local land use plans. The proposed improvement plans also will include design features to mitigate impacts to the environment, and where noted, the project proposer will work with the appropriate agencies to continue to address the environmental impacts. 2. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. As discussed in the EAW and Finding of Fact, the cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future development, to the extent that they can be identified, have been considered in the analysis prepared for the study. There were no comments received by regulatory agency staff requesting or identifying the need for an EIS. The EAW provides adequate information to make a determination on the level of environmental impact that will result from the proposed project, given what is known about related or anticipated future projects. 3. Extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. The City of Maplewood may issue permits to allow construction in compliance with the rules of the EAW and in conformance with the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act. The mitigation of environmental impacts will be designed and implemented in coordination with regulatory agencies and will be subject to the plan approval and permitting process. Mitigation will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. The permits and approvals required for this project include: 1 County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 13 UNIT OF TYPE OF APPLICATION STATUS GOVERNMENT U.S. Army Corps Section 404 Permit To be applied for of Engineers Minnesota Plan Review To be applied for Construction Permit to Work in To be applied for Department of Transportation R ight-of-Way Signal Justification Report To be submitted Minnesota Environmental Health Services To be applied for Department of Water Permit Health Minnesota Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be a lied for Pollution Control NPDES Construction Permit To be applied for Agency (MPCA) EAW Negative Declaration To follow EAW City of pre aration Right -of -Way Plan Approval To be a lied for Maplewood Roadway Improvement Plan To be applied for Approval Ramse y County Construction Permit to Work in To be applied for - Right -of -Way Wetland Plan Review To be applied for Ramsey- Grading and Construction Permit To be applied for Washington Storm Water and Water Quality To be applied for Metro Watershed District Plan Review and Approval, Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Metropolitan Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To be applied for Council 4. Extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies. The proposed project is similar to many recent projects completed throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Although each site is unique, the anticipated environmental effects are common for this type of project. The impacts are relatively predictable and do not pose significant concerns in terms of long -term effects of the project. County Road D Realignment Project Finding of Fact 03/26/03 Page 14 CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings, the City of Maplewood has determined that the environmental review requirements have been met by the EAW prepared for this project, and that the potential environmental effects are not considered significant. Therefore, an EIS is not needed. li County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Page 15 , ATTACHMENT 1 Comment Letters County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Attachments r� I I� Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55106 March 6, 2003 Mr. Chuck Ahl, P.E. City of Maplewood (l Director of Public Works /City Engineer 14 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 RE: Realignment of County Road D from Hazelwood Avenue to TH61 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. Aid; The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the proposed realignment of County Road D. We offer the following comments for your consideration. The review of this project raised no particular concerns regarding potential impacts to natural resources. The Division of Trails and Waterways expressed appreciation for the attention paid to the local trails network, with the Lake Links Trail segment included as part of the road project and consideration of a grade- separated crossing for the future extension of the BNBruce Vento Regional Trail. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation is the lead contact for these trails projects. Please contact Ramsey County's Greg Mack for additional consultation (651748-2500). In addition, you may feel free to contact Michael Martinez, DNR Acquisition and Development Specialist, for additional information (651772-7640) Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and the EAW. Based on the DNR's perspective, this project does not require preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to comments at the conclusion of environmental review. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 and 5, require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding on this action. If you have any questions about these comments, please call Wayne Barstad, the Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, at 651- 772 -7940. Sincerely, Kathleen A. Wallace Regional Director c: Steve Colvin Wayne Barstad Sarah Hoffman Mike Martinez Bryan Lueth Travis Germundson Diane Anderson Jon Larsen, EQB Nick Rowse, USFWS #20030547 I MW03CountyRoadD.doc l_ An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity L -� DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 1 -888 -646 -6367 TTY: 651- 296 -5484 1- 800 -657 -3929 Mar 06 03 04:21p City of Maplewood 651 746 3069 p.2 - 1 GO Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 132 Roseville, MN 55113 March 3, 2003 Chuck Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Maplewood, Ramsey Control Section 6222 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above referenced Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). Please address the following issues before any further development: SUBJECT: EAW County Road D Realignment Project Mn/DOT Review #EAW03 -002 TH 61, between County Road D and Beam Avenue • The stopping sight distance from the south may be a concern. It may be slightly limited by the existing crest vertical curve on TH 61. If you have any questions regarding this issue please contact Ken Ljung at (651) 634 -2113 in Mn/DOT's Design section. • Mn/DOT has access control along TH 61 in the location of the new County Road D alignment. The new road will need a new access opening and the old access will need to' be closed with access control when the project is further developed. If you have any questions regarding this issue please contact Is Xiong at (651) 582 -1266. Mn/DOT permits will be required for this project. Any use of or work within Mn/DOT right of way requires a permit. Project plans will need to be submitted when the project is further along. Questions regarding permit applications can be directed to Keith VanWagner at (65 1) 582 -1443. r� c fI Attached are Mn/DOT's traffic continents regarding this project. If you have any questions J please contact Cassandra Isackson, Mn/DOT Traffic Engineer, at (65 1) 634 -2145. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Paul Czech Mn/DOT - Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B -2 j l Roseville, Minnesota. 55113. J Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete an *delay ( r E 0 An equal opportunity employer f� 4� Mar 06 03 04:21p Citu of Maplewood 651 748 3089 :6 Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your an cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions regarding this review please feel free to contact me at (651) 582-137' f ", - z! Sincerely, c5s Brigid Gombold Senior Transportation Planner Copy: Dan Soler / Ramsey County Traffic Engineer Jessica Overmohle / URS Ann Braden / Metropolitan Council Mn/DOT Division File CS 6222 Mn/DOT LGL File — Maplewood Maplewood P.3 fr Mar 06 03 04:21p City of Maplewood 651 748 3089 - p.4 re County Road D Relocation EAW MUMOT Traffic Comments are as folio 1) A Signal Justification Report (SJR) will be required for the new signal at Beam Contact: Lars Impola at (651) 634 -2379. 2) TH 61 is a minor arterial in an urban/urbanizing area. Mn/DOT's access managemeti guidelines for this location are 1/4 mile signal spacing, 1/4 mile spacing for full movement intersections, and 1/8 mile spacing for conditional, secondary intersections. a) The new location of County Road D will meet our access management guidelines. (approximately 2000' south of the I -694 ramps and 1300' north of Beam Avenue). b) This project should be phased such that the closure of `old" County Road D (meda4i opening and right - in/right -out on the west side of TH 61) takes place in advance of nr simultaneously to the relocation of County Road D. Reasons are as follows. -. i) The existing 3/4 intersection at County Road D and TH 61 does not meet our des: management guidelines. ii) This project will result in an increase in traffic volume at the I -694 interchanl Paraphrase from the Purpose and Need on page 3 of the EAW: "The purpose of this project is to provide relief to the existing roadway s} the vicinity of Maplewood Mail ... (and) also serve traffic that is to be gen by future development... The proximity of this intersection ["old" Count D] to the I- 694/TH 61 intersection ramps compromises its ability to opera and efficiently." iii) There is currently a higher than expected number of rear end collisions involy right turning vehicles at the eastbound I -694 ramp to SB TH 61. iv) In anticipation of the traffic volume increase from this project an d the closure County Road D west of TH 61, Mn/DOT is planning to install a southbound acceleration lane on TH 61 for the vehicles turning right off of the eastbound ramp. This installation cannot take place without the closure of County Road of TH 61. c) The right- in/right -out intersection at County Road Don the east side of TH 61 doe meet our access management guidelines. This is the y public street serving the properties to the east of TH 61, so a right- in/right -out will be allowed. However, i "old" connection of County Road D thru to VVbite Bear Avenue is ever restored w investigate the closure of this access due to the proximity to the I -694 ramps, in J l_� Mar 06 03 04:21p City of Maplewood 651 748 3089 RECEIVED Metropolitan Council Building communities that work Y March 5, 2003 Mr. Chuck Ahl, P.E. Director of Public Works /City Engineer 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109 -27 -97 -� RE: EAW -- County Road D Realignment Metropolitan Council District 11 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 18894-1 V Dear Mr. Ahl: Council staff has conducted a review of this environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns. The proposed project would r approximately one -mile of County Road D between Hazelwood Avenue just west of Tran f , l (TH) 61. The staff review has concluded that the EAW is complete and accurate with rest concerns and raises no major issues of consistency with Council policies. An EIS is not n regional purposes. The following technical comments are offered concerning specific iten (� Item 11— Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources U The EAW states that Blanding's Turtle, a state -listed threatened species, has histor observed within a one -mile radius of the project site. Given the number and extent and proposed mitigation wetlands on the site, and the understanding that BIanding' known to travel up to one mile from wetland feeding areas to upland nesting areas, possible that they may traverse portions of this proposed roadway. Council staff re (i considering the utilization of surmountable curbing for the proposed roadway recor t J project, in lieu of the designs presented on Figure 4. 1 Item 6 - Description 1 The EAW states that the proposed eight -foot trail on the south side of a realigned _ would be known as the Lake Links Regional Trail. This trail is actually proposed tc j trail. It was studied as a part of the Lake Links Trail Network Master Plan The EAW describes the trail as "interim." It is understood that trails are apart of t j 1 transportation infrastructure and that it will continue to be accommodated in some lJ when the corridor is used for additional transportation uses. P.5 sary for the EAl been quite a local if Item 25 - Nearby Resources As the proposed project map depicts an intersection of the future segment of the B Vento Trail and County Road D, the City and the County need to work together to ensure State Regional Parks System is appropriately accommodated. w .Inetromuncfl.arg M info Line 230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1000 • Fax 602 -1550 • TCY 291 -0 An Fqu OPParI ^n" Enhloyer i Mar 06 03 04:22p City of Maplewood 651 748 3 EAW - County Road D Realignment March 5, 2003 Page Two This will conclude the Council's review of the EAW. The Council will take no for EAW. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Vicki reviewer, at (651) 602 -1478. Sincerely, Phyllis Hanson, Manager Planning and Technical Assistance cc: Marcel Eibensteiner, Council Member, Metropolitan Council District 11 Vicki Spragg, Principal Reviewer Cheryl Olson, Referrals Coordinator V: /refetr WMaplewao&lxtters/ Maplewood 2003 County Road MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY March 10, 20,03 UUJ Mr. Chuck AN Director of Public Works /City Engineer 1830 County Road 8 East Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 Re: EAW — Realignment of County Road D from Hazelwood Avenue. to T.H. 61 Maplewood, Ramsey County SHPO Number: 2003 -1148 .Dear Mr. Ahl: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above - referenced project. It has.' been reviewed pursuant responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites. Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in Minnesota Rules 441 As the response to question 25a indicates, .cultural resource issues are currently being g addressed. in consultation with our office. (See our letter of 18 February to URS, enclosed.) Contact us at 65.1 -296 -5462 with questions or concerns. Sincerely, Dennis A. Gimmestad Government Programs & Compliance Officer cc: Michael. Justin, URS enc: SHPO letter of 18 February 2003 345 Kellogg Boulevard West/ Saint Paul, Nlinnesota 55102 -1906 / Telephone 651- 296 -6126 �B 2 , 2003 1VIINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE February 18, 2003 Mr. Michael Justin URS Thresher Square 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 RE: County Road D Realignment between Hazelwood Street and T.H. 61 Maplewood, Ramsey County SHPO Number: 2003 -1148 Dear Mr. Justin: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above project. it has been reviewed pursuant to the responsibilities given the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota. Field Archaeology Act. Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. It appears that there may be two issues related to unevaluated historic properties in the area. These issues would need to be addressed as part of any Section 106 review of the project, should the project include a federal involvement. 1. The review submittal includes a chart of fourteen inventoried properties, along with a statement that they are outside the area of direct impact. It is not clear whether they lie within the APE as far as indirect impacts are concerned: If they do, further evaluation may be needed. 2. The section of the Northern Pacific Railroad in the area is cited as having a high degree of integrity. The effects of the project on this property need to be assessed. Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at (651) 296 -5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, Britta L. Bloomberg Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer 345 Kellogg Boulevard West /Saint Paul, Minnesota 551.02 -1.906 /Telephone 651 - 296 -6126 R 2 4 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CENTRE 190 FIFTH STREET EAST ST. PAUL, MN 55101 -1638 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: March 19, 2003 Construction - Operations Regulatory ( 03 - 02 834 -TJF) Ms. Jessica Overmohle URS Thresher Square 700 South Third Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 Dear Ms. Overmohle: We have reviewed the Environmental Assessment Worksheet prepared for . the realignment of a segment of County Road D in Maplewood, west-of the Maplewood Mall. It appears the project would involve the placement of fill material into waters or wetlands. As you have indicated, the project would require a permit from the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Please submit the appropriate application package when the plans are sufficiently developed so. our office can make a final determination on the need for a Corps permit. Any application should clearly address wetland impacts and alternative measures that have been considered to avoid and minimize those impacts. A discussion of wetland mitigation /replacement should also be included in the application. If you-have any questions, contact Timothy J. Fell in our St. Paul office at (651) 290 -5360. In any correspondence or inquiries, please refer to the Regulatory number shown above. Sincerely, / ,kb ert J. biting ief, Regulatory Branch Gerald & Linda Peterson 3016 Hazelwood St N Maplewood Mn City of Maplewood Dear Chuck Ahl: This is in response to the EAw for the county road D project. I would like to see the wetland mitigation area by the corner of Hazelwood and CR D to be smaller. Also what type of wetland? Lake, semi wet, marsh. Looks more like a storm basin. The end of Hazelwood shows storm drains in the road, Hazelwoods water runs off to the sides it should not have anything that would prevent that. I believe the wetland .mitigation area at the end of Hazelwood is higher than the road. Is the water to be pumped up or is there going to be a big hole? It is to close to the home. Could be a possible hazard to the children. Keep it closer to were it is being moved from. Also I did not see any information 'about pest control & smell due to the increased ponds and wetlands Also the hours of work should read 7:00 AM to 7:00 Pm Monday through Saturday. Sincerely, • I N i � n Chuck Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood March 4, 2003 EAW Response Dear Mr. Ahl There are several items in the EAW that I have issues with and would suggest the following changes be considered. A. The area identified as Wetland Mitigation Area East of the Hazelwood and County Road intersection should be moved to the North and East of the proposed area. There needs to be more distance between the homes and the Wetland area. The land today does not support wetland in that area and it's hard to believe that wetlands should be created that close to residential property. I did not see anything in the EAW about care for the ponds . Y g . and wetland. Such as mosquito control, smell and grasses in or around the wetland. With the recent spread of diseases carried by mosquitoes like the West Nile Disease a wetland area should not be placed near the current homes on Hazelwood Street. B. Mosquito and pest control. Who will control the mosquitoes and pests in and around the proposed ponds and wetland areas? If the realignment of County Road D -requires more ponds and wetland treatment of them should also be required. Noise as identified on page 19. In the AURA there were studies indicating that the noise leve's were already high in the area south of County Road D. The proposed residential buildings in the Legacy of Maplewood area will have .special care given to windows and insulation to reduce the noise. The Realignment of County Road D will bring the traffic closer to the Residence on the East side of Hazelwood St. What compensation will there be to the homeowners to reduce the noise level in there homes? :Construction Noise on page 19. The defined hours are from 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM. I believe the AURA had 7:00 AM to 7: PM and is it not City Code to be 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. J I would ask that the above suggestions and comments be reviewed. I would ask that the Residents along the east side of Hazelwood Street be advised in writing of the time lines and meetings for the County Road D Realignment Project and EAW review. Thank you, George and Kathy Supan 3050 Hazelwood Street Maplewood, MN 55109 651- 777 -8209 cc: Richard Fursman Robert Cardinal Karl : Please place this. comment with the EAW comments, even it was submitted a couple of months ago. Chuck - - -- Original Message---- - From: Pat and Steve Martinson [mailto:smpv@mindspring.com] Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 5:27 PM To: chuck.ahl @ci.*maplewood.mn.us Subject: Cty Rd D Realignment Plan Chuck, I am unable to attend the meeting scheduled for December 9th, but have observations about the current situation on Cty Rd D west of Hwy 61 that are important and should be addressed when Cty Rd D is realigned: 1) There needs to be a shoulder on Cty Rd D west of 61. There is a bus stop and considerable pedestrian traffic between Hwy 61 and Walter. An increase in traffic will cause safety issues if a shoulder is not added. 2.) There are maiboxes right along Cty Rd D west of 61 which is dangerous for mail carriers and residents as they get their mail. The mailboxes should be set back off the highway, or, adding a wider shoulder would help. 3) The intersection at Highridge Ct and Cty D is a blind intersection and that will need to be addressed. Sincerely, Steve Martinson 2969 Frank St Maplewood, MN 55109 651- 766 -7979 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.417 / Virus Database: 233 - Release Date: 11/8/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 Karl Keel U-1 A. - - M_ 03/03/03 05:07 PM To: Jessica Overmohle /Minneapolis /URSCorp@URSCorp, Beth Kunkel /Minneapolis /URSCorp@ URSCorp cc: Subject: FW: County Road D Realignment • - - -- Forwarded by Karl Keel /Minneapolis /URSCorp on 03/03/03 05:06 PM - - - -- "Chuck Ahl" To: "Karl Keel \(E- mail\)" <Karl_Keel @ URSCorp.com> <Chuck.Ahl@ci.Maple cc: wood.mn.us> Subject: FW: County Road D Realignment 03/03/03 01:56 PM Please respond to Chuck.Ahl EAW Comment for the records - - -- Original Message---- - From: scott.milton @kodak.com [mailto:scott.miltonCkodak.com] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 1:08 PM To: chuck.ahl @ci.maplewood.mn.us Subject: County Road D Realignment Chuck, I would like to highlight two concerns with the County Road D realignment. A stoplight at the intersection of Highway 61 and County road D was previously looked at by the state highway department when the Morgen's were - trying to develop the west area along Highway 61 with an apartment complex. At that time the stoplight was not approved by the highway department because it would severely back -up traffic along Highway 61. Is this still a concern of the highway department or the city? From experience on driving this route, traffic can and does back -up from county road -C to Beam going north and from 694 to Beam going south during rush hour. Addition of an extra intersection will make for greater gridlock along this .route, :similar to what happens along White Bear Ave. And this is without the added traffic from the proposed development west of Maplewood Mall. :Secondly, would the implementation of this plan now allow the Morgen's to develop the area west of highway 61 with an apartment complex? The Kohlman neighborhood was strongly against this when it was previously brought before the council. There is concern that this may allow the project to slip in without further review. Is the property west of Hwy 61 slated to have its zoning changed from commercial to high density residential as part of this realignment? Thank -you, Scott Milton 2965 Edward Street Maplewood, MN 55109 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. - Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.456 / Virus Database: 256 - Release Date: 2/18/2003 Karl: Another message for the EAW comments. Chuck - - - -- Original Message---- - From: eelpout @attbi.com [mailto:eelpout@attbi.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 8 :39 AM To: chuck.ahl @ci.maplewood.mn.us Subject: City project 02 -07 and 02 -08 Mr. Ahl, I will not be able to attend the meeting on 12/3/02 but would like to several comments. I live on Walter St., west of Hwy 61. With the car dealership expanding and some of the traffic changes that have been made at /around the current Co. Rd. D, the traffic and speed of traffic on our street has increased significantly. Anything the - new plan can do to decompress the traffic flow on the local side streets, including Walter, will be greatly appreciated. Any plans for D west of 61 should include an option (? mandate) for non -local traffic to access the "new D" and have access to south and NORTH bound 61. If the proposed changes do not include creating a northbound 61 option off of D, I would heartily suggest this. When we purchased our lot more than 12 years ago we never anticipated it would be a safety issue if our kids wanted to skateboard, bike, or rollerblade on our street. With the developement of additional business on 61, no northbound 61 access from D, and further expansion of residential developement on top of the hill behind Gulden's our street, at times, is a safety issue. 'A practical diversion of County Road D with access to north and south bound Hwy 61 will help diminish unnecessary traffic to our neighborhood. Thank you, Joseph Wegner P.S. If you are contemplating an additional traffic signal in the area of Gulden's I would recommend observing the trafic flow on southbound 61 attempting to turn eastbound on Beam during the Christmas holidays. Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release.Date: 11/25/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 Another EAW comment. - - - -- Original Message=--- - From: KranzFam @aol.com (mailto:KranzFam @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday December 11, 2 - 1 , 0 53 PM To: chuck.ahl@ci.maplewood.mn.us Subject:. Cty D realignment Dear Chuck, I spoke at the public hearing on Monday night and wanted to write you and ask for clarification now that the proposal to study the new alignment has been passed. I live on Highridge Court and had asked that the new road be located further east than you had proposed originally. I believe you said "we could move the road further east ". I am wondering if now that you are going to the next phase of study, the new study would in fact show the road to be further east than originally thought. After hearing the comments from the owner of the pet kennel, I think moving the proposed realignment east would also alleviate her concerns about accessibility to her place of business. My 2nd question is concerning when the council will once again address this topic. I think I heard February mentioned but would like a specific so I can plan to be present. Will this be another public hearing? I appreciate your time and hope to hear from you regarding these concerns. Cindy Kranz 1264 Highridge Ct. 651 -777 -7938 Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti -virus system (http: / /www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 ATTACHMENT 2 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Recommendations for Construction County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Attachments CAUTION L TURTLES MAYBE ENCOUNTERED IN THIS AREA The:unique and1rare Blanding's turtle has been found.in this area. Blanding's .turtles are a State Threatened species and are protected under Minnesota Statute 84.095, Protection of Threatened and Endangered Species. Please be careful of turtles on roads and in construction sites. For additional information on turtles, or to report a Blanding's turtle sighting, contact the DNR Nongame Specialist nearest you: Bemidji (218- 755 - 2976); Brainerd (218- 828 - 2228); New Ulm (507- 359 - 6033); Rochester (507- 280 - 5070); or St. Paul (651 -297- 2277). DESCRIPTION: The Blanding's turtle is a medium to large turtle (5 to 10 inches) with a black or dark blue, dome - shaped shell with muted yellow spots and bars. The bottom of the shell is hinged across the front third, enabling the turtle to pull the front edge of the lower shell firmly against the top shell to provide additional protection when threatened. The head, legs, and tail are dark brown or blue -gray with small dots of light brown or yellow. A distinctive field mark is the bright yellow chin and neck. Illustration by Don Luce, from Turtles in Minnesota, Natural History Leaflet No. 9, June 1989, James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS J FOR AVOIDING AND MINIMIZING IMPACTS TO BLANDING'S TURTLE POPULATIONS (see Environmental Review Fact Sheet Series for full recommendations) • A flyer with an illustration of an adult Blanding's turtle should be given to all contractors working in the area. Homeowners should also be informed of the presence of Blanding's turtles in the area. • Turtles which are in imminent danger should be moved, by hand., out of harm's way. Turtles which are not in imminent danger should be left undisturbed to continue their travel among wetlands and/or nest siteso � If a Blanding's turtle pests in your yard, do not disturb the nest, and do not allow pets near the nest. • Blanding's turtles do not make good pets. It is illegal to keep this threatened species in captivity. • Silt fencing should be set up to keep turtles out of construction areas. It is critical that silt fencing be removed after the area has been revegetated. • Small, vegetated temporary wetlands should not be dredged, deepened, or filled. • All wetlands should be protected from pollution; use of fertilizers and pesticides should be avoided, and run -off from lawns streets should be controlled. Erosion should be prevented to keep sediment from, reaching wetlands and lakes. • Roads should be kept to minimum standards on widths and lanes. • Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. If curbs must be used, 4" high curbs at a 3:1 slope are preferred. • Culverts under roads crossing wetland areas, between wetland areas, or between wetland and nesting areas should be at least 36 in. diameter and flat - bottomed or elliptical. • Culverts under roads crossing streams should be oversized (at least twice as wide, as the normal width of open water) and flat - bottomed or elliptical. • Utility access and maintenance roads should be kept to a minimum. • Below- ground utility construction sites should be returned to original grade. • Terrain should be left with as much natural contour as possible. • Graded areas should be revegetated with native grasses and fortis. • Vegetation management in infrequently mowed areas -- such as in ditches, along utility access roads, and under power lines -- should be done mechanically (chemicals should not be used). Work should occur fall through spring (after October 1 and before June 1 a Compiled by the :Minnesota Department of lVatural Resources l alural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, Au,,ust, 2001 ir 55155 / 651- 786 nd�ingered Species Environmental Review Coordinator, 500 :oaf yette Rd., Box 25, St. Paul. s . l EitdaiWered, 79ireatened4 and Special Concern Species of Muuiesata B1 g's Turde � (,9mydoi&w. blarndinofi) Minnesota. Status: Threatened State Rank': S2 Federal Status: none Global Rank': G4 HABITAT USE Blanding's turtles need both wetland and upland habitats to complete their life cycle. The types of wetlands used include - ponds, marshes, shrub swamps, bogs, and ditches - and streams with slow-moving water. In . Minnesota Blanding. s turtles are primarily marsh and pond inhabitants. Calm shallow water bodies (Type 1 -3 wetlands) with mud bottoms and abundant aquatic vegetation (cattails, water lilies; etc.) are preferred, and extensive marshes bordering rivers provide excellent habitat. Small temporary wetlands (those that dry up in the late summer or fall) are frequently used in spring and summer -- these fishless pools are amphibian and invertebrate breeding habitat, which provides an important food source for Blanding's turtles. Also, the warmer water of these shallower areas probably aids in the development of eggs within the female turtle. Nesting occurs in open (grassy or brushy) sandy uplands, often some distance from water bodies. Frequently, nesting occurs in traditional nesting grounds on undeveloped land. Blanding's turtles have also been known to nest successfully on residential property (especially in low density housing situations), and to utilize disturbed areas such as farm fields, gardens, under power lines, and road shoulders (especially of dirt roads). Although Blanding's turtles may travel through woodlots during their seasonal movements, shady areas (including forests and lawns with shade trees) are not used for nesting. Wetlands with deeper water are needed .in times of drought, and during the winter. Blanding's turtles overwinter in the muddy bottoms of deeper marshes and ponds, or other water bodies where they are protected from freezing. LIFE HISTORY Individuals emerge from overwintering and begin basking in late March or early April on warm, sunny days. The increase in body temperature which occurs during basking is necessary for egg development within the female. turtle. Nesting in Minnesota typically occurs during June, and females are most active in late afternoon and at dusk. Nesting can occur as much as a mile from wetlands. The nest is dug by the female in an open sandy area and 6 -15 eggs are laid. The female turtle returns to the marsh within 24 hours of laying eggs. After a development period of approximately two months, hatchlings leave the nest from mid- August through early- October. Nesting females and hatchlings are often at risk of being killed while crossing roads between wetlands and nesting areas. In addition to movements associated with nesting, all ages and both sexes move between wetlands from April through November. These movements peak in June and July and again in September and October as turtles move to and from overwintering sites. In late autumn (typically November), Blanding's turtles bury themselves in the substrate (the mud at the bottom) of deeper wetlands to overwinter. IMPACTS I THREATS I CAUSES OF DECLINE • loss of wetland habitat through drainage or flooding (converting wetlands into ponds or lakes) • loss of upland habitat through development or .conversion to agriculture • human disturbance, including collection for the pet trade* and road kills during seasonal movements • increase in predator populations (skunks, racoons, etc.) which prey on nests and oun y g * It is illegal to possess this threatened species. Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Enviromnental Review Faet Sheet Series. Blanding's Turtle. 2 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AVOIDING AND MINIMIZING IMPACTS These recommendations apply to typical construction projects and general land use within Blanding's turtle habitat, and are provided to help local governments, developers, contractors, and homeowners minimize or avoid detrimental impacts to Blanding's turtle populations. List 1 describes minimum measures which we recommend to prevent harm to Blanding's turtles during construction or other work within Blanding's turtle habitat. List 2 contains recommendations which offer even greater protection for Blanding's turtles populations; this list should be used in addition to the first list in areas which are known to be of state -wide importance to Blanding's turtles (contact the DNR's Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program if you wish to determine if your project or home is in one of these areas), or in any other area where greater protection for Blanding's turtles is desired. List 1. Recommendations for all areas inhabited by List 2. Additional recommendations for areas known to Blanding's turtles. be of state -wide importan t Bl turtles. GENERAL A flyer with an- illustration -of a Blanding's AtuIle should be given to all contractors working in the area. Homeowners should also be informed of the presence of Blanding's turtles in the area. Tuttle crossing signs can be installed adj acent to road - crossing areas used by Blanding's turtles to increase public awareness and reduce road kills. Turtles which are in imminent danger should be moved, by Workers in the area should be aware that Blanding's turtles hand, out of harm's way. Turtles which are not in imminent nest in June, generally after 4pm, and should be advised to danger should be left undisturbed. minimize disturbance if turtles are seen. If a Blanding's turtle nests in your yard, do not disturb the nest. If you would like to provide more protection for a Blanding's turtle nest on your properly, see "Protecting Blanding's Turtle Nests on page 3 of this fact sheet. Silt fencing should be set up to keep turtles out of construction areas. It is critical that silt fencing be removed after the area has been revegetated. Construction in potential nesting areas should be limited to the period between September 15 and June 1 (this is the time when activity of adults and hatchlings in upland areas is at a minimum). WETLANDS Small, vegetated temporary wetlands (Types 2 & 3) should not be dredged, deepened, filled, or converted to storm water retention basins (these wetlands provide important habitat during spring and summer). Shallow portions of wetlands should not be disturbed during prime basking time mid morning to mid- afternoon in May and June). A wide buffer should be left along the shore to minimise human activity near wetlands (basking Blanding's turtles are more easily disturbed than other turtle species). Wetlands should be protected from pollution; use of fertilizers and pesticides should be avoided, and run-off from lawns and streets should be controlled. - Erosion should be prevented to keep sediment from reaching. wetlands and lakes. Roads should be kept to minimum standards on widths and lanes (this reduces road kills by slowing traffic and reducing the distance turtles need to cross). Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. If curbs must be used, 4 inch high curbs at a 3:1 slope are preferred (Blanding's turtles have great difficulty climbing traditional curbs; curbs and below grade roads trap turtles on the road and can cause road kills). Wetlands should be protected from road, lawn, and other chemical run -off by a vegetated buffer strip at least 50' wide. This area should be left unmowed and in a natural condition. ROADS Tunnels should be considered in areas with concentrations of turtle crossings (more than 10 turtles per year per 100 areas f lower dense if the level of meters of road }, and in re s o density road use would make a safe crossing impossible for turtles. Contact your DNR Regional Nongame Specialist for further information on wildlife tunnels. Roads should be ditched, not curbed or below grade. Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage and NOngame Research Program Environmental Review Fact Sheet Series. Blanding's Turtle 3 ROADS coat. l Culverts, between wetland areas, or between wetland areas and nesting areas, should be 36 inches or greater in diameter, and elliptical or flat-bottomed. Wetland crossings should be bridged, or include raised roadways with culverts which are 36 in or greater in diameter and flat - bottomed or elliptical (raised roadways discourage turtles from leaving the wetland to bask on roads). Culverts under roads crossing streams should be oversized (at least twice as wide as the normal width of open water) and flat- bottomed or elliptical. Utility access and maintenance roads should be kept to a minimum (this reduces road -kill potential). Below-ground utility construction sites should be returned to original grade (trenches can trap turtles). Road placement should avoid separating wetlands from adjacent upland nesting sites, or-these roads should be fenced to prevent turtles from attempting to cross them (contact your DNR Nongame Specialist for details). Road placement should avoid bisecting wetlands, or these roads should be fenced to prevent turtles from attempting to cross them (contactyour DNR Nonga e Specialist for details). This is especially ally important for roads with more than 21anes. Roads crossing streams should be bridged. t LANDSCAPING AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 1 Terrain should be left with as much natural contour as possible. As much natural landscape as possible should be preserved (installation of sod or wood chips, paving, and planting of trees within nesting bitat can make that habitat unusable to nesting Blanding's turtles). Graded areas should be revegetated with native .grasses and forbs (some non - natives form dense patches through which it -is difficult for turtles to travel). Vegetation management in infrequently mowed areas -- such as in ditches along utility access roads, g ty s o ds, and under power lines -- should be done mechanically (chemicals should not be used). Work should occur fall through spring (after October 1 and before June 1 ). Open space should include some areas at higher elevations for nesting. These areas should be retained In native vegetation, and should be connected to wetlands by a wide corridor of native vegetation. Ditches and utility access roads should not be mowed or managed through use of chemicals. If vegetation management is required, it should be done mechanically, as infrequently as possible, and fall through spring (mowing can kill turtles present during mowing, and makes it easier for predators to locate turtles crossing roads). Protecting Blanding's Turtle Nests: Most predation on turtle nests occurs within 48 hours after the eggs are laid. -After this time, the scent is gone from the nest -and it is more difficult for predators to locate the nest. Nests more than a week old probably do not need additional protection, 'unless they are in a particularly vulnerable spot, such as a yard where pets may disturb the nest. Turtle nests can be protected from predators and other disturbance by covering them with a piece of wire fencing (such as chicken wire), secured to the ground with stakes or rocks. The piece of fencing should measure at least 2 ft. x 2 ft., and should be of medium sized mesh (openings should be about 2 in. x 2 in.). It is very important that the fencing be removed before August 1 8 so the young turtles can escape from the nest when they hatch! REFERENCES 'Association for Biodiversity Information. "Heritage Status: Global, National, and Subnational Conservation Status Ranks." NatureServe. Version 1.3 (9 April 2001). hq:// www.natureserve.org /ranking_htm (15 April 2001). Coffin, B., and L. Pfanmueller. 1988. Minnesota's Endangered Flora and Fauna. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 473 pp. Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program Environmental Review Pact Sheet Series. Blanding's Turtle. 1 REFERENCES cunt. Moria ,1 L, and M. Linck. 1994. Suggested guidelines for projects occurring in Blanding's turtle habitat. Unpublished report to the Minnesota DNR. 8 pp. O ldfiel and J. I Mori arty. 1994. Amphibians and Reptiles Native to Minnesota.. University of Minnesota d, B. a�Y A Press, Minneapolis, 237 pp. Sa, T. D., and I W. Lang. 2000. Thermal ecology of Blanding's turtle in central Minnesota. Cheloni J wa' J Conservation and Biology 3(4):626 -636. _ y' ., y • Y H .Y;Y s ..R: : . i ' T� v �J• �• •rte •• • .. < • �• • Compiled by the Minnesota Department of Xatural Resources Natural ,heritage and Aongame Research Program, September, 2001 Endangered Spec es Environmental Review Coordinator, 500 Laf vette Rd , Box R' )5, St. Paul, A 55155 I X51- 29f� -7 63 ATTACHMENT 3 County Road D Realignment Project EAW Distribution List County Road D Realignment Project 03126103 Finding of Fact Attachments r COUNTY ROAD D EAW DISTRIBUTION LIST i EQB LIST Chuck Ahl, P.E. 395 John Ireland Boulevard MS 620 Environmental Quality Board Robert Whiting Environmental Review Program U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 300 Centennial Building Regulatory Functions Branch State Historical Preservation Office 658 Cedar Street Army Corps of Engineers Center St. Paul, MN 55155. 190 Fifth Street East Maplewood Library St. Paul, MN 55101 -1638 1670 Beam Avenue Board of Water & Soil Resources Maplewood, MN 55109 Beth Lockwood, Supervisor Jim Haertel U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service One West Water Street Twin Cities Field Office E.S. Ken Haider Suite 200 4101 East 80 Street St. Paul, MN 55155 Si. Paul, MN 55107 Bloomington, MN 55425 -1665 Department of Agriculture U.S. Environmental Protection Becky Balk Agency 90 West Plato Boulevard William D. Franz St. Paul, MN 55107 Chief of Environmental Review 77 West Jackson Blvd. Department of Health Chicago, IL 60604 -3590 Environmental Health Division Policy, Planning and Analysis Unit Legislative Reference Library 121 East Seventh Place, Suite 230 Carol Blackburn :St. P_ aul, MN 55101 645 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Department of Commerce Marya White Environmental Conservation Library 85 7 th Place East Minneapolis Public Library Suite 500 300 Nicollet Mall St. Paul, MN 55101 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Department of Natural Resources Metropolitan Council Rebecca Wooden Referrals Coordinator Environmental Review Unit Mears Park Centre 500 Lafayette Road 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55101 Department of Transportation Gerald Larson CITY/PROPOSER MnDOT Environmental Services Chuck Ahl, P.E. 395 John Ireland Boulevard MS 620 Director of Public Works St. Paul, MN 55155 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 Minnesota Historical Society State Historical Preservation Office LOCAL LIBRARIES 345 Kellogg Boulevard W., Level A St. Paul, MN 55102 Maplewood Library 1670 Beam Avenue MN Pollution Control Agency Maplewood, MN 55109 Beth Lockwood, Supervisor Env. Review Unit/Maj ors/Rem OTHERS Division Ken Haider 520 Lafayette Road Ramsey County St. Paul, MN 55155 50 Kellogg Blvd W #910 St. Paul, MN 55102 -1657 Greg Mack Ramsey County Parks and Recreation 2015 North Van Dyke Street Maplewood, MN 55109 Kathryn DeSpiegelaere RCRRA 50 West Kellogg Blvd Suite 665 RCGC -West St. Paul, MN 55102 Frank Pafko Mn/DOT 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Dave Engstrom Mn/DOT 1500 West County Road B2 Roseville, MN 55113 Aaron Isaacs Metro Transit 560 6 th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55411 -4398 Richard Terway City of Vadnais Heights 800 East County Road E Vadnais Heights, MN 55127 -7117 Mark Burch City of White Bear Lake 4701 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Collette Jurek Xcel Energy 3000 Maxwell Avenue Newport, MN 55055 Cliff Aichinger RWMWD 1902 County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109