Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 03-10 City Council PacketCouncil /Manager's Workshop S: 30 p. m. t AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M. Monday, March 10, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 03 -05 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the February 24, 2003 Council /Manager's Workshop 2. Minutes from the February 24, 2003 City Council Meeting, Meeting No. 03 -04 E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. . APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion: If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, -that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Paramedic Call Pay for Paid - Per -Call Firefighters 3. Approve Sewer Televising Contract 4. Approve Replacement Purchase of Two Staff Cars - Public Works 5. Approve Three (3) Resolutions: 1) Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Consolidation with Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District; 2) Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement Dissolution; and 3) Approving Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Boundary Change 6. Accept LEAP Award (Landscape Ecology Award Program) presented to the City of Maplewood by the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Natural Resources Board 7. Dial Tone Agreement Renewal H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. Maplewood Drive/Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03 -02 Resolution Ordering Improvement following the Public Hearing 2. 7:15 p.m. Sibley Cove Apartment Building (County Road D) Land use Plan Change (BC to R -3 (H)) Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development 3. 7:30 p.m. Saint Paul Soccer Center (County Road B) Land Use Plan Change (OS (open space) to P (park)) Conditional Use Permit I, AWARD OF BIDS J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Legacy Village of Maplewood, City Project 02-18: Resolution Receiving Responses to Comments on Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and Calling Public Hearing g L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. N. ' ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 0. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMA4UNITY Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected officials, staff and "citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable .manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respecffiul language. a Be C. FBI DRAFT--MINUTES CITY COUNCIL /MANAGER WO RIME1 DA ITEM NONN" Monday, February 24, 2003 Council Chambers Y Cit Hall Action by Coun�'1� 6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL -� Re w rp Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Absent Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present Others Present: City Manager Fursman Assistant City Manager Coleman City Clerk Guilfoile Public Works Director Ahl APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes-All NEW BUSINESS 1. Representatives Nora Slawik and Scott Wasiluk, and Senator Chuck Wei g er Representative Slawik was present to discuss the Governor's ro osed budget and the 4 p p g .5 billion dollar deficit. Senator Chuck Weiger noted priority one is to have a balanced budget by the end of the legislative session in May. The senator reviewed how the ro osed budget p p g would impact public safety and other issues in the City of Maplewood. Representative Scott Wasiluk luk echoed his colleague's remarks and shared feedback from citizens regarding public safet g g p y concerns. All representatives responded to questions from the City Council. 2. Funding Street Construction and Maintenance in Minnesota's Cities This item was moved to New Business at the City Council Meeting following adjournment g g � ournment of this Manager /Council's Workshop. 3. City Manger's Performance Review Councilmember Collins moved to table this item until the April 14th council p meeting when Councilmembers are able to be present. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes-All CounciWanager's Workshop 02 -24 -03 Mayor Cardinal distributed the following City Council and City Manager Evaluation: City Council and City Manager Evaluation 1. To provide services to citizens in a tax efficient manner 2. Actively welcoming input from constituents 3. Working effectively as five council members and city manager 4. Providing visionary leadership while empowering staff 5. Bringing strong communication skills and integrity to the community 6. Promoting a positive image and presence for the City of Maplewood p 7. Helping continue growth and successful development of Maplewood 8. Professional development 9. Handling council /manager political difficulties that city may face as election officials 10. Providing community with politically stable environment 11. Personal commitments to the city we serve 12. Creating city management teams and shifting roles to facilitate change agent 13. g g Creating city management teams that lead to more support for manager and council 14. Perform "above and beyond" what is require to accomplish things that are often unrecogn g gn ed and the rewards for which "are highly uncertain at best" 15. Deep seated loyalty to the city and personally accepting and endorsing ts mission 16. g Communicated support to employees throughout the city organization 17. Handle conflict in minimal manner where the city manager has found strop support for his g pp role as leader of his staff 18. City manager asked to express opinions on the level of support he receives from the council uncil 19. City manager expresses his level of j ob satisfaction and effectiveness with his elected officials 20. City manager rates political stability, family desires and needs, degree of management latitude, gr' g quality of life in community, salary and benefits 21. City manager to express community characteristics, such as artisan election racial diversi p s ity 22. City manager to express why he wants to continue 23. Is the right chemistry present between the city manager and the community 24. Does racial and ideological growth conflict with the community 25. Does the diversity in Maplewood create political conflict 26. Does the city appear in slow growth, moderate growth or rapid growth p �' 27. Does the community growth in Maplewood provide continual challenges for the city ma staff g y pager and his sta 28. Do nonpartisan elections help make Maplewood's government less conflictual and roduc p e a more stable environment for the community 29. Does the may support the city manager in our government council-manager form of g g 30. Is the city manager one of three types - the careerist, the administrative specialist, and the e local appointee? Example - the careerist sees city management as a life -lop occupation and i g p s likely to move from city to city in search of grater opportunities and advancement. Example - the administrative dministrative specialist is recruited from another field, such as business management because of his or g her expertise in a particular field. Example - the local appointee is the hometown manager with deep g p who had the fewest professional ties, was likely to have the lowest level of education and experience, and demonstrates the fewest signs of either geographic or 'ob mobility. . y 31. The city manager can rate his satisfaction in his work from not satisfied to highly satisfied 32. How does the city manager view his job satisfaction 33. Does the city manager receive support from the city council 34. How effective is the city council as a decision making body Y 35. Does the city council make decisions with speed and ease reaching consensus sus Council/Manager's Workshop 02 -24 -03 2 36. How well does the city council work together 37. What depress of political and personality conflicts interfere in their work 38. What favorable community conditions and government stability have combined for the city manager to work with E. FUTURE TOPICS Exploring the Possibilities of a Sister City 2. Sidewalk Study- Overall City Plan Street Scape Plan F. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Juenemann moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Council/Manager's Workshop 02 -24 -03 ID Be C. In E. DRAFT - - MINUTES AGEND IT N MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 24, 2003 Council Chambers, Municipal Building ` �� p C ounc il Meeting No. 03 -04 CALL TO ORDER:' Re' �� - . A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers at the -Muni cip and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Boy Scout Troup 461 led the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Absent Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember Present APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the Council /Manager Workshop February 0 2003 ry , Councilmember Juenemann moved to a rove the Council /Mana er Worksh � op Minutes of February 10, 2003 as amended. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes-Mayor Cardinal ,Councilmember Collins, and Juenemann Abstain - Councilmember Wasiluk 2. Minutes from City Council Meeting, February 10, 2003-Meeting o. 03- g 03 Councilmember Juenemann moved to a rove the City Council Minutes of F ctiruary 10, 2003, meeting No. 03 -03 as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmember Collins, and Juenemann Abstain - Councilmember Wasiluk APPROVAL OF AGENDA K10. Funding Street Construction M1. Soccer Fields M2. Mayor's Forum M3. Tree Sale Citv Council MeetinLy 02 -24 -03 Councilmember Wasiluk moved to a rove the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS 1. Water Board Appointment Mayor Cardinal moved to a oint Councilmember Ken Collins to the Water Board. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All G. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $518,851-02 Checks #60139 thru #60148 dated 2/2 thru 2/5/03 $74,801.97 Checks #60149 thru #60187 dated 2/7 thru 2/11/03 $10,761,696.51 Disbursements via debits to checkin g account dated 1/31 thru 2/5/03 $83.24 Checks #60188 thru #60189 dated 2/10 thru 2/11/03 $436,928.18 Checks #60190 thru #60254 dated 2/18/03 $109,618.92 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 2/6 thru 2/13/03 $11,901,979.84 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $113,946.00 Payroll (Merit Pay) Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2/7/03 $415 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2/14/03 $26,895.04 Payroll Deduction checks #92590 thru #92597 dated 2/14/03 $555,995.77 Total Payroll $ GRAND TOTAL Citv Council Meeting 02 -24 -03 2 2. Disposal of Old Financial Records Adopted the following resolution for appropriate financial records to be destroyed: RESOLUTION 03 -02 -021 WHEREAS, M. S.A. 13 8.17 governs the destruction of city records; and WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the Council with a request in q writing that destruction be approved by the Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA; 1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota State Historical Society for an order authorizing destruction of the records as described in the attached list. 2. That upon approval by the State of the attached application, the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to destroy the records listed. 3. Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association (MMUA) Contract Approval Approved the Minnesota Municipal Utilities Association (MMUA) Contract. 4. 2002 Community Design Review Board (CDRB) Annual Report Accepted the 2002 Community Design Review Board Annual Report. 5. Conditional Use Permit Review - Comfort Bus Company (1870 Rice Street) Agreed to review the conditional use permit for the bus maintenance and repair garage for p g g Comfort Bus Company at 1870 Rice Street again in one year to ensure completion of the prod ect. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda items 1 2 & 4 as resented. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve consent a enda item 3 as resented. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes -All Councilmember Collins moved to approve consent agenda item 5 as resented. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes- Councilmembers Collins, Juenemann, and Wasiluk Abstain -Mayor Cardinal Citv Council MeetinLa 02 -24 -03 3 H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. Ohlson Landscaping (1949 Atlantic Street) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Metal Building Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Outdoor Storage Design Approval a. Assistant City Manager Coleman presented the staff report. b. Commissioner Pearson presented the Planning Commission Report. C. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Stephanie Jacques', the applicant, 1706 Barclay Street, Maplewood Erik Ohlson, the applicant, 1706 Barclay Street, Maplewood d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Juenemann moved to ado t the following resolution a rovin Erik Ohlson and Stephanie Jacques' request for a conditional use permit for exterior storage at 1949 Atlantic Street: RESOLUTION 03 -02 -022 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Erik Ohlson and Stephanie Jacques applied for a conditional use p ermit for exterior storage within the business commercial zoning district for their landscape business; WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 1949 Atlantic Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. The legal description is: Vacated alley adjacent and accruing and except the South 10 feet, the East 8.57 feet of Lot 14• also, the East 8.57 feet of Lots 11 through 13; also Lot 6, except the South 10 feet of that p art West of the East 103.57 feet of said Lot 6; and all of Lots 7 through 10, all in Block 3, Lincoln Park, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this property is 16- 29 -22 -14 -0089; WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 3, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city ouncil approve the Y pp conditional use permit. 2. On February 24, 2003, the city council held a public . hearin g Y Cit staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to p speak and resent written p statements. The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. Citv Council MeetinLy 02 -24 -03 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or ro osed streets. p p 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including treets police and g �p fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. Exterior storage is limited to four landscape bins (8 feet wide x 8 feet deep 6 feet high in size). . g ) The bins shall be constructed of treated lumber that is brown in color. Storage within the bins is limited to landscape goods or materials such as rock, mulch, sand, woodchi p s, etc. 2. The four approved landscape bins must be screened from view of the Gateway Trail with native plantings. 3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city ouncil approval Y pp or the permit shall become null and void. 4. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one Y ear. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the f ollowing resolution air)proving Erik Ohlson and Stephanie Jacques' re uest for a conditional use ermit for construction of a metal stora e building at 1949 Atlantic Street: Citv Council Meeting 02 -24 -03 RESOLUTION 03 -02 -023 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Erik Ohlson and Stephanie Jacques applied for a conditional use P ermit for the construction of a metal storage building that is 6,528 square feet in area and 23 feet, 6 inches in height within the Business Commercial zoning district; WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 1949 Atlantic Street, Maplewood, Minnesota. The legal description is: Vacated alley adjacent and accruing and except the South 10 feet, the East 8.57 feet of Lot 14• also, the East 8.57 feet of Lots 11 through 13; also Lot 6, art except the South 10 feet of that p p West of the East 103.57 feet of said Lot 6; and all of Lots 7 through 10, all in Block 3 Lincoln g , Park, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Property Identification Number for this ro ert is 16- 29 -22 -14 -0089; p p Y WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On February 3, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city ouncil approve th Y pp e conditional use permit. 2. On February 24, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. City staff published a notice in g Y p the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council conducted the public hearing whereby all public present were given a chance to speak and resent written p p n statements. The city council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above - described pp conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved roved this permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformit ty with the city's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surroundin g area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation p anon that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to an person any r o property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air p ollution drainage, water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services including g streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewers stems schools and ark systems, parks. Citv Council 02 -24 -03 6 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval of the conditional use permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be no noise - making business activity ' conducted in the lot, or made by vehicles entering or leaving the lot, between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m., Monday through Saturday, or all day Sunday as required by code. 2. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city council approval or the permit shall become null and void. 4. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one year. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the building elevation adin /draina e and lightin plans date-stamped FebruM 11 2003 and the site /landsca e lan date-stamped FebruM 12 2003, for a 6,528- square -foot metal building for the Ohlson Landscaping, Inc. business located at 1949 Atlantic Street. Approval is based on the following conditions: a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. b. Provide the following for city staff approval before the city issues a grading or building permit: 1) A detailed grading, ' drainage and erosion control plan and a detailed utility plan, subject to the city engineer's approval. In addition, the applicants must sign a developer's agreement with the City of Maplewood to ensure proper extension of city sewer and water to the site. If rock infiltration pumps are proposed, a maintenance agreement must be signed with the City of Maplewood ensuring that the sumps are periodically cleaned. 2) A revised site plan showing the following: a) The parking lot layout including the location of at least nine paved arkin p g spaces, the location of all Class 5 material, and a concrete slab in front of all garage doors. b) The driveway with a width of at least 20 feet that is paved between the street and the parking lot. Any gate along this driveway must also open to a 20 -foot width. Citv Council 02 -24 -03 C) The location of four treated lumber landscape bins, brown in color, and a maximum size of 8 feet wide x 8 feet deep x 6 feet high. 3) Revised building elevations showing the following: a) The proposed vinyl wainscoting shown on all elevations of the building. b) The proposed vinyl wainscoting shown constructed up to the height of the window trim. C) Two exterior faucets located on the north and south side of the building. 4) Building samples of metal panels, standing seam roof, trim, doors, and wainscot. 5) A revised landscape /screening plan that shows the following: a) The four spruce trees proposed for the north side of the property are revised from 6 feet in height to 8 feet in height. b) All landscape material must be installed on the applicants' property. C) Turf establishment plan showing all areas not consisting of Class 5 or pavement as being vegetated with grass or native plantings. d) Landscaping within any proposed rainwater garden. If the basin area will only be seeded, the area must be vegetated with native grasses and forbes. The mix design must be preapproved by the city in advance of seeding. e) A signed agreement with the City of Maplewood stating that the owners will hand water all landscaping. Any required landscape material that dies must be replaced. 6) A detailed photometric plan for all proposed outdoor lighting. All freestanding lights are limited to 25 feet in height, and the light illumination from any outdoor light must not exceed .4 foot candles at all property lines. 7) Plans for atrash- dumpster enclosure. The gates ,shall be 100 percent opaque, and the materials and colors of the enclosure shall be compatible with those of the new metal building. This plan shall be subject to staff approval. 8) A letter of credit or cash escrow for all required exterior improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work. C. Complete the following before occupying the metal building: 1) Install all required exterior improvements. d. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if: p rY p Y Citv Council 02 -24 -03 8 1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. 2) The above - required letter of credit or cash escrow is held by the City of Maplewood for all required exterior improvements. The owner or contractor shall complete any unfinished exterior improvements by June 1 if occupancy of the building is in the fall or winter, or within six weeks of occupancy of the building if occupancy is in the spring or summer. e. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All I. AWARD OF BIDS None J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Temporary Liquor License - Aldrich Arena for St. Paul Winter Carnival Councilmember Juenemann moved to table the request for the temporary intoxicating liquor license for Joe Murphy on behalf of Aldrich Arena for the St. Paul Winter Carnival until March 10, 2003 when the applicant could be present. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All 2. On -Sale Liquor License - Martin Mongoven for Chili's Restaurant -1800 Beam Avenue a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report. C. Martin Mongoven, the applicant, was present to answer questions. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the intoxicating_ liquor license for Martin Mangoven for Chili's Restaurant at 1800 Beam Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All 3. Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District, Approve Letter of Support of Boundary rY Revisions in South Maplewood a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Citv Council 02 -24 -03 9 C. The following persons were heard: Cliff Aichinger, Ramsey /Washington Watershed District Matt Moore, South Washington Watershed District Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the bounda . change petition dissolving the East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All 4. English Street Improvements, Proj ect 01 -14: Review and Approval of Landscape Concepts for Roundabout a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. The following person was heard: Laurie McRostie, Landscape Architect with Short Elliot and Hendrickson, Inc. Councilmember Collins moved to approve the landscaping and street light system at Frost Avenue and English Street and authorize preparation of plans and specifications for the Evergreen Knoll Concept. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All Mayor Cardinal applied chair privilege to allow the following persons to be heard: Steve Dobihal, 1276 Lark Avenue, Maplewood Dean Mathisen, 2096 McKnight Road, Maplewood 5. NPDES Phase II MS4 Permit, Project 02 -22: Approve Permit Application for Maplewood Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, (SWPPP) a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. C. The following person was heard: Ron Leaf, SHE Inc., the consulting firm for the project, was present for questions. Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution approving the NPDES Phase II Federal Permit for Munici al Seinarate Storm Sewer Systems, MS4), the NPDES Phase II General Permit for Municipally Owned Industrial Operations, (Industrial), and authorize the Cit y Engineer to submit the permits to the Minnesota Pollution Control A enc MPCA b �v, ( 1 v the March 10 2003 deadline as required by the 1991 Federal Clean Water Act and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7001: Citv Council 02 -24 -03 10 RESOLUTION NO. 03-02-024 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NPDES PHASE II GENERAL PERMIT FOR MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS, (MS4), AND THE NPDES PHASE II GENERAL PERMIT FOR MUNICIPALLY OWNED INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS, (INDUSTRIAL), PROJECT 02 -22 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is required to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II General Permit to operate and have discharges from a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4); and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is also required to obtain separate coverage under the NPDES Phase II General Permit for Municipally -Owned Industrial Operations for storm water discharges from the City's Public Works Facility; and WHEREAS, staff and the consulting firm of SEH, Inc. have prepared draft permits for the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the draft permits and finds them to be in acceptable order and authorizes their submittal to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency by the application deadline of March 10, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the City Council hereby adopts the following: 1. Notice of Intent to obtain coverage under the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems, (MS4 Permit), under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Permit Program. 2. Notice of Intent to obtain coverage under the General Permit Authorization to Discharge Storm Water Associated with Municipally Owned Industrial Operations, (Industrial Permit), under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System Permit Program. Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All 6. Maplewood Drive West /Keller Parkway, Project 03 -02- Resolution Accepting Report and Calling for Public Hearing a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Collins moved to adopt the following resolution accepting the report and calling for a public hearing for 7:00 p.m., Monday, March 10, 2003, for the Maplewood Drive West /Keller Parkway Resurfacing Project: Citv Council 02 -24 -03 11 RESOLUTION 03 -02 -025 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted December 23, 2002, a report has been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the resurfacing of Maplewood Drive West /Keller Parkway, City Project 03 -02, and this report was received by the council on February 24, 2003, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $444,850. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 10th day of March 2003 in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 7. Gladstone South Streets, City Project 00 -03: Resolution for Modification of Existing Construction Contract, Change Orders 2 & 3 a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the following resolution directing the modification of the existing construction contract for the Gladstone South Neighborhood Improvements, Project 00-03: RESOLUTION 03 -02 -026 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 00 -03, Gladstone South Neighborhood Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 00 -03, Change Order No. 2 and Change Order No. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $13,414.74 and Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $44,750.61 The revised contract amount is $2,212,869.78. Citv Council 02 -24 -03 12 No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these changes fall within the original project budget. A final project recap will be done at a later date to reapportion funding based on the cost of work. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 8. County Road D Improvement, Project 01-15: Resolution for Modification of Existing Construction Contract, Change order No. 3 a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to adopt the following resolution Directing the Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, (Change Order #3), for the County Road D Improvements, Project 01-15: RESOLUTION 03 -02 -027 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Proj ect 01 -15, County Road D Improvements and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Proj ect 01 -15, Change Order No. 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $37,835.00. The revised contract amount is $1,114,181.15. No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these changes fall within the original project budget. A final project reconciliation will be done at a later date to reapportion the funding based on final work. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All 9. Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, Project 03 -05; Authorize Update a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Wasiluk moved to authorize the city , engineer to hire a consultant engineer to assist in the update of the Comprehensive Sewer Stud of Maplewood and direct the finance director to transfer $15,000 form the sewer fund to establish ,a project fund. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All Citv Council 02 -24 -03 13 10. Funding Street Construction and Maintenance in Minnesota's Cities a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report No action was required for this item. L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Andrew Kline, Troup 461 -2488 Arlington Avenue E., Maplewood -Mr. Kline shared fundraising ideas he had for the city. 2. Charlie Miettunen, Troup 461 -2688 Barclay Street North, Maplewood -Mr. Miettunen would like to see the old compost site on Beam Avenue be renovated in to a recreational site. 3. Steven Dobihal, Troup 461 -1276 Lark Ave. E, Maplewood -Mr. Dobihal asked what the younger generation could do to help with financial problems in the city. 4. Patrick Schultz -1500 Mary Street North, Maplewood -Mr. Schultz inquired about the future plans for the lot on Frost and English. Mayor Cardinal stated the city would be beautifying it. 5. Dean Mathisen -2196 McKnight Road, Maplewood- Mr. Mathisen was curious about the NW corner of Highway 61 and Beam Avenue (by Maplewood Toyota) and why there are parked vehicles on the grass in the right -of -way. Assistant City Manager Coleman stated Maplewood Toyota is under expansion and the city has granted them temporary permission to park on the grass during the construction of their addition. 6. Kevin Klein- 2488 Arlington Avenue East, Maplewood- Viewed an article in the Minneapolis news regarding the Sterling Oaks Park Development, which his home borders. He was curious as to when the neighborhood meeting would be held. Assistant City manager Coleman will get Mr. Klein in touch with Parks and Recreation Director Anderson. 7. Andrew Klein, Troup 461-2488 Arlington Avenue East, Maplewood- Shared his idea of putting a flagpole in the middle of the roundabout, which he felt would be more cost effective than trees when it came to replacement. M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Soccer Fields -Mayor Cardinal would like Parks and Recreation Director Anderson to poll the Parks Commission on where they stand with the soccer fields. The Public Hearing for the council on the soccer fields is set for March 10, 2003. 2. Mayor's Forum -The Mayor's forum for Saturday, March 1 St has been cancelled. 3. Tree Sale -Mayor Cardinal noted the Friends of the Park tree pickup will be at the Ramsey County Park's Office on Saturday, May 3rd 9:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. The cost is approximately $13 -$42 and must be ordered in advance. For more information residents Citv Council 02 -24 -03 14 can call Andie at 651- 770 -4500. 4. Ramsey County League of Local Governments Meeting (Saturday, March 8th)- Councilmember Juenemann noted this meeting (which will be dealing with the budget deficit) is an attempt to create networking and partnerships between cities, counties and school districts. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS City Manager Fursman informed the public that there would not be any cuts to the services the city provides due to budget cuts. O. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Cardinal moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:17 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk . Ayes - All Citv Council 02 -24 -03 15 AGENDA NO. G -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council Action by Counc Y FROM: Finance Director Dfrin RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS h � Ali- DATE: March 3, 2003 Reje Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational u oses. The City Man er has p rp y g reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved p olicies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $8,900-00 Checks #60255 dated 2/14/03 $34,589.23 Checks #60256 thru #60304 dated 2/25/03 $291,585.22 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 2/14 thru 2/20/03 $3,110.00 Checks #60305 thru #60311 dated 2/24 thru 2/27/03 $412,077.74 Checks #60312 thru #60364 dated 3/4/03 $182,609.23 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 2/21 thru 2/28/03 $932,871.42 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $407,925.45 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 2/28/03 $24,247.58 Payroll Deduction checks #92764 thru #92769 dated 2/28/03 $ Total Payroll $1,365,044.45 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have an questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. hu attachments PARNANCEMORMAGMApCM 030303.doc 1 vch'list Check Register Page: 1 02/21 /2003 9:59:10AM 'City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor Description /Account 60255 2/14/2003 00702 60256 2/25/2003 00111 60257 2/25/2003 00120 60258 2/25/2003 00173 -60259 2/25/2003 00198 60260 2/25/2003 01869 :60261 2/25/2003 01865 60262 2/25/2003 02740 60263 2/25/2003 01871 60264 2/25/2003 00332 60265 2/25/2003 02743 60266 2/21/2003 00415 60267 2/25/2003 01866 60268 2/25/2003 00539 60269 2/21/2003 00547 60270 2/25/2003 02262 60271 2/25/2003 00589 60272 2/25/2003 01867 60273 2/25/2003 00788 60274 2/25/2003 01874 60275 2/25/2003 00828 60276 2/25/2003 01873 60277 2/25/2003 00932 60278 2/25/2003 .01819 60279 2/25/2003 01044 60280 2/25/2003 01087 60281 2/25/2003 01148 60282 2/25/2003 01126 60283 2/25/2003 01175 60284 2/25/2003 01202 ICMA ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC AQUA LOGIC INC BELDEN, TIM BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS BOETCHER, DALE BOWMAN, DON CASH, DEBBIE COOPER, KENNETH CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY DOBLAR, RICHARD DON'S PAINT & BODY SHOP EMME, MARK FREEDOM VALU CENTER G.L. BERG & ASSOCIATES ENT GEBO, ROBERT L GRAF, DAVE HANSON, PERRY KAKIS, FLINT KULAS, RONALD C. LMCIT LAYMAN, KARI MAPLEWOOD BAKERY MCLEOD USA MN FIRE SERVICE CERT BD MN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION NATURAL AREAS ASSOCIATION NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 612001 NORTH ST PAUL, CITY OF PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT PROG PATROL & BOARDING FEES CHEMICAL SYSTEM TUNED PIANO MONTHLY WATER UTIL - BILL DATE 2/18 VOLLEYBALL REFEREE VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL COORDINATOR ANIMAL CARE PRESENTATION VOLLEYBALL REFEREE .MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL REIMBURSE FOR MEALS 2/16 TO 2/17 REPAIR SQUAD 956 VOLLEYBALL REFEREE CAR WASHES ENTERTAINER DEPOSIT FOR 4/17/2003 VOLLEYBALL REFEREE KARATE INSTRUCTOR VOLLEYBALL REFEREE REIMBURSE FOR MEALS VOLLEYBALL REFEREE INSURANCE CLAIM #11039434 - GARRET VOLLEYBALL REFEREE BIRTHDAY CAKES LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 1/16 TO 2/15 FIRE FIGHTER TESTS MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL PERA LIFE INS (P /R DEDUCTED IN FEB) MONTHLY UTILITIES 1/10 TO 2/9 SEWER & SECURITY LIGHT SEWER CHARGES CITY NEWSLETTER - FEB MCC REC PROGRAMS - SPRING REF ZACHARY BREWER - MEMBERSHIP REF JESSICA BUCHTA - MCC PROGRA REF CHISAGO LAKES KIDS CLUB - GROI REF DEBORAH FELLOWS - NC PROGRA VOLLEYBALL OFFICIAL SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL MEMBERSHIP WINTER HATS VOLLEYBALL REFEREE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE REIMBURSE PARKING & UNIFORM REPLICA HATS UNIFORM SHIRTS CARTRIDGES TONER REIMBURSE MEAL, PRKG, FUEL 1/31 TO UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNIFORM UNIFORM BADGES NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC 60285 2/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 60286 2/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 60287 2/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 60288 2/25/2003 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR 60289 2/25/2003 01863 PACKER, ROGER 60290 2/25/2003 01349 RANGER RICK 60291 2/25/2003 01326 RCLLG 60292 2/25/2003 02741 ROETTJER EMBROIDERY 60293 2/25/2003 02663 SAARION, CARL .60294 2/25/2003 01875 SANDER, JAMES E. 60295 2/25/2003 01915 STEFFEN, NANCY 60296 2/25/2003 01527 STEFFEN, SCOTT 60297 2/25/2003 01537 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC. 60298 2/25/2003 01558 SUPERIOR PRINTWEAR 60299 2/25/2003 01572 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. 60300 2/25/2003 01616 THIENES, PAUL 60301 2/25/2003 01683 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC Amount .8,900.00 1,199.61 4,641.68 60.00 781.20 100.00 512.50 50.00 240.00 35.00 14.42 4,482.58 60.00 99.05 550.00 60.00 60.75 380.00 31.31 360.00 2,300.00 180.00 125.00 4,673.53 100.00 25.00 30.00 261.00 848.55 401.92 218.29 3,387.00 509.07 610.00 72.00 16.40 16.00 700.00 17.00 1,350.00 432.00 500.00 220.00 180.00 138.08 1,463.00 323.40 418.79 294.66 34.60 22.31 80.00 301.30 297.23 vchtist Check Register Page. . 2 02 /tl /2003- 9:59:1 OAM City p of Maplewood Check 'Date Vendor 60302 2/25/2003 02742 60303 2/25/2003 01872 60304 2/25/2003 02462 naaerinfinn /Ar -&-^, on4- WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S WEBER, MARK WEMYSS, SCOTT D DISPATCHER TRAINING VOLLEYBALL REFEREE NAME TAGS Amount 99.00 220.00 6.39 50 Checks in this report T 43 489. Total checks: 62 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description 02/13/03 02/14/03 MN .State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 02/14/03 02/14/03 ICMA (Vantagepointe) Deferred Compensation 02/13/03 02/14/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP & Flex plan payments 02/13/03 02/14/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 02/07/03 02/14/03 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 02/14/03 02/18/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 02/14/03 02/18/03 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 02/14/03 02/18/03 P. E. R.A. P.E. R.A. 02/18/03 02/19/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 02/14/03 02/19/03 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 02/12/03 02/19/03 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 02/14/03 02/19/03 Federal Reserve Bank Savings Bonds 02/19/03 02/20/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar TOTAL Amount 7,591.32 12,831.76 681.01 2,436.00 42,405.19 8,348.36 115,643.72 48,074.39 11,676.18 16,245.04 9,113.00 400.00 16,139.25 291, 585.22 n vchlist 02/28/2003 11:28:21 AM Check Register City of Maplewood Page: 1 Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount 60305 2/24/2003 00917 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 2003 ELGIN SWEEPER CLINIC - 2 100.00 60306 2/24/2003 00917 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT INC 2003 VACTOR CLINIC - 3 225.00 60307 2/24/2003 01052 MN PARK SUPERVISORS ASSN 2003 MEMBERSHIP 35.00 60308 2/25/2003 00917 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT INC JET VACTOR CLINIC - 4 350.00 60309 2/25/2003 00221 BROCK WHITE COMPANY, LLC. CRACK SEALING SEMINAR - 4 160.00 60310 2/27/2003 02445 MAGIC MAN INC MCC ENTERTAINER 2/27/2003 1,600.00 60311 2/27/2003 02745 EMERY, SEAN MCC ENTERTAINER 2/27/2003 640.00 60312 3/4/2003 02744 AMERICAN CARPET MILLS INSTALL CARPET & VINYL 512.00 60313 3/4/2003 02510 ANIMALS OF WALTON'S HOLLOW MCC PROGRAM - DOWN PYMT 225.00 60314 3/4/2003 02324 APPLIED ECOLOGICAL SERVICES GPS DATA COLLECTION AND MAPPING 460.00 60315 3/4/2003 00174 BELDE, STAN REIMBURSE FOR K -9 BOARDING 240.30 K -9 HANDLER - FEB 35.00 K -9 HANDLER - MAR 35.00 60316 3/4/2003 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC IMERCH FOR RESALE 78.00 60317 3/4/2003 00196 BLUEBIRD RECOVERY PROGRAM ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 8.00 60318 3/4/2003 00198 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS WATER UTIL THRU 2/12 .28 17 60319 3/4/2003 00279 GEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. SECURITY BARRIERS FOR CITY HALL 702.90 60320 3/4/2003 02746 CLOVER SUPER FOODS IMERCH FOR RESALE 166.85 60321 3/4/2003 01969 DEBILZAN, TOM REIMBURSE PARKING 2/13 10.00 60322 3/4/2003 02207 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MN MONTHLY PREMIUM 8,163.80 60323 3/4/2003 00449 EDEN SYSTEMS INC SOFTWARE SUPPORT 10/02 TO 12/02 707.40 :60324 3/4/2003 02735 EXPERTCITY INC ACTIVATION FEE (ONE TIME PER PC) 3,999.00 60325 3/4/2003 00487 F.M. FRATTALONE EXC INC PROD 00 -03 GLADSTONE SO #10 41,179.71 60326 3/4/2003 00508 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MINN INTL FIRE CODE BOOK 74.50 60327 3/4/2003 00519 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO. SENSOR SWITCH 29.46 60328 3/4/2003 00543 GE CAPITAL RICOH COPIER LEASE 293.94 60329 3/4/2003 00585 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL LOCATE TICKETS 6.20 60330 3/4/2003 00644 HEALTHPARTNERS MONTHLY PREMIUM 1,155.74 60331 3/4/2003 00668 HIEBERT, STEVEN K -9 HANDLER - FEB 35.00 K -9 HANDLER - MAR 35.00 60332 3/4/2003 00687 HUGO'S TREE CARE HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVAL 332.28 60333 3/4/2003 00755 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC 5 TURN OUT COATS AND PANTS 6,669.98 60334 3/4/2003 00785 KAMCOM TECHNOLOGIES PC SYSTEMS AS QUOTED 5,617.88 MICROSOFT EXCHANGE SERVER LIC 3 2,524.05 60335 3/4/2003 00900 M E C A MECA CONF REGISTRATION 125.00 60336 3/4/2003 00910 M S S A 2003 MEMBERSHIP - 3 79.00 60337 3/4/2003 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 137.25 60338 3/4/2003 01819 MCLEOD USA DSL SERVICE - JAN 706.01 60339 3/4/2003 00966 MEDICA CHOICE MONTHLY PREMIUM 92,114.72 60340 3/4/2003 00985 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWATER - MAR 193,678.33 60341 3/4/2003 01085 MN LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY PREMIUM 3,302.05 60342 3/4/2003 01086 MN NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY 2003 MEMBERSHIP 20.00 60343 3/4/2003 01977 MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION SEMINAR FEE - 2 230.00 60344 3/4/2003 02091 NAUGHTON, JOHN REIMBURSE FOR PARKING 2/20 7.00 60345 3/4/2003 01254 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY MERCH FOR RESALE 699.20 MERCH FOR RESALE 611.10 60346 3/4/2003 02061 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT CO INC TAN SNAPTITE DISCHARGE HOSES 1,917.00 60347 3/4/2003 02249 QWEST GOVERNMENT SRVS INC 911 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - FEB 587.00 60348 3/4/2003 01345 RAMSEY COUNTY DATA PROCESSING - NOV 2,920.00 60349 3/4/2003 01345 RAMSEY COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS LIC 311.00 60350 3/4/2003 01338 RAMSEY COUNTY -VITAL SERVICES NOTARY SIGNATURE REGISTRATION - 2 50.00 60351 3/4/2003 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE CREDIT - MERCH FOR RESALE -9.45 MERCH FOR RESALE 517.99 MERCH FOR RESALE 223.64 vchlist Check Register Page: 2 02/28/2003 11:28:21 AM City of Maplewood Check Date Vendor 60351 3/4/2003 01360 60352 3/4/2003 01025 60353 3/4/2003 01409 60354 3/4/2003 02192 60355 3/4/2003 01526 60356 3/4/2003 01537 60357 3/4/2003 01560 60358 3/4/2003 01569 60359 3/4/2003 01572 60360 3/4/2003 01580 60361 3/4/2003 02203 60362 3/4/2003 02290 60363 3/4/2003 01750 60364 3/4/2003 02736 60 Checks in this report REINHART FOODSERVICE (Continued) MERCH FOR RESALE 287.25 REVENUE, MN DEPT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE BASE TAX 50.00 S.E.H. PROJ 02 -22 NPDES PHASE 11 10,339.58 SCHINDELDECKER, JIM REIMBURSE FOR PARKING 2/19 5.00 STATE TREASURER MANF STRUCTURES SEMINAR - 4 140.00 STREAMLINE DESIGN INC. ASSORTED 50/50 TEE 1,953.48 SUPERIOR SERVICES INC RECYCLING - JAN 17,866.12 SWEET COMPUTER SERVICES, INC SOFTWARE SUPPORT THRU 2/26/04 1,680.00 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. INK CARTRIDGES 440.22 INK CARTRIDGES 209.10 TSE, INC. JANITORIAL SERVICES 1,370.66 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - LTD `MONTHLY PREMIUM 2,939.30 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE - STD SHORT -TERM DISABILITY - MAR 11201.77 WATSON CO INC, THE MERCH FOR RESALE 270.03 YOUR VERY OWN GEEK.COM OPEN FILE MGR SOFTWARE WITH 1 YE 1 Total checks : 4159187.74 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 02/20/03 02/21 /03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /De ut Registrar License/Deputy Y 9 9 357.5 0 02/20/03 02/21/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP & Flex plan payments 492.88 02/12/03 02/21/03 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 209.00 02/20/03 02/21/03 Pitney Bowes Postage 31000.00 02/21/03 02/24/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 13,157.31 02/23/03 02/24/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1 02/24/03 02/25/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 15,575.08 02/25/03 02/26/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 50,360.00 02/26/03 02/27/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 17 02/21/03 02/27/03 Elan Financial Services Purchasing card items 49,715.06 02/27/03 02/28/03 MN State Treasurer Drivers License /Deputy Registrar 12 02/28/03 02/28/03 ICMA (Vantagepointe) Deferred Compensation 6 02/27/03 02/28/03 DCRP /Flex account DCRP & Flex plan payments 430.14 02/27/03 02/28/03 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 11161-50 TOTAL 182,609.23 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 1� CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 02/28/03 COLLINS, KENNETH 357.47 dd 02/28/03 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 357.47 dd 02/28/03 KOPPEN, MARVIN 357.47 dd 02/28/03 DARST, ROBERTA 1,386.79 dd 02/28/03 FURSMAN, RICHARD 4,419.60 dd 02/28/03 SCHLINGMAN, PAUL 2,026.22 dd 02/28/03 SEEGER, GERALD 473.30 -dd 02/28/03 SWANSON, LYLE 1 dd 02/28/03 pCARLSON, THERESE 2,133.34 dd 02/28/03 LE, SHERYL 3,592.64 dd 02/28/03 FAUST, DANIEL 3,745.90 -dd 02/28/03 URBANSKI, HOLLY 1 dd 02/28/03 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,520.37 ;dd 02/28/03 BAUMAN GAYLE 2,758.75 dd 02/28/03 JACKSON, MARY 1,715.85 dd 02/28/03 KELSEY, CONNIE 1,582.68 dd 02/28/03 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,651.05 dd 02/28/03 FRY, PATRICIA 1,592.65 dd 02/28/03 GUILFOILE, KAREN 2,546.16 dd 02/28/03 OSTER, ANDREA 1 dd 02/28/03 CARLE, JEANETTE L552.96 dd 02/28/03 JAGOE, CAROL 1,550.65 dd 02/28/03 JOHNSON, BONNIE 1,045.61 dd 02/28/03 OLSON, SANDRA 1,165.88 dd 02/28/03 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,590.23 dd 02/28/03 CORCORAN, THERESA 1 dd 02/28/03 MARTINS ON, CAROL L650.91 dd 02/28/03 POWELL, PHILIP 1,916.62 dd . 02/28/03 SPANGLER, EDNA 357.50 dd 02/28/03 THOMALLA, DAVID 3,546.50 dd 02/2 8/03 ABEL, CLINT 1 dd 02/28/03 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2A5.58 dd 02/28/03 ANDREWS, SCOTT 3,257.52 dd 02/28/03 BAKKE, LONN 2,400.58 dd 02/28/03 BANICK, JOHN 3,201.24 dd 02/28/03 BELDE, STANLEY 2,218.78 dd 02/28/03 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 1,514.19 dd 02/28/03 BOHL, JOHN 2 dd 02/28/03 BUSACK, DANIEL 2 dd 02/28/03 COFFEY, KEVIN 1,493.80 dd 02/28/03 DOBLAR, RICHARD 2 dd 02/28/03 HALWEG, KEVIN 207.21 dd 02/28/03 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,506.08 dd 02/28/03 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,507.39 1� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 02/28/03 JOHNSON, KEVIN 2 dd 02/28/03 KARIS, FLINT 2,825.44 dd 02/28/03 KONG, TOMMY 2,021.66 dd 02/28/03 KROLL, BRETT 1 dd 02/28/03 KVAM, DAVID 3 dd 02/28/03 LARSON, DANIEL 2,409.58 dd 02/28/03 LU, JOHNNIE 1 dd 02/28/03 MARINO, JASON 1,700.93 dd 02/28/03 MARTIN, JERROLD 1 dd 02/28/03 METRY, ALESIA 1 dd 02/28/03 OLSON, JULIE 2,231.72 dd 02/28/03 PALMA, STEVEN 2 dd 02/28/03 PIKE, GARY 2 dd 02/28/03 RABBETT, KEVIN 2,783.47 dd 02/28/03 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,365.00 dd 02/28/03 STOCKTON, DERRELL 2,301.63 - dd 02/28/03 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,358.21 dd 02/28/03 THIENES, PAUL 2 dd 02/28/03 IRAN, JOSEPH 1 dd 02/28/03 WATCZAK, LAURA 2 dd 02/28/03 WENZEL, JAY 2 dd 02/28/03 XIONG, KAO 1,809.66 dd 02/28/03 BARTZ, PAUL 2,546.40 dd 02/28/03 BERGERON, JOSEPH 3,005.10 dd 02/28/03 CROTTY, KERRY 2 dd .02/28/03 DUGAS, MICHAEL 1,888.67 dd '02/28/03 DUNN, ALICE 2 dd 02/28/03 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2 dd 02/28/03 EVERSON, PAUL 205.85 dd 02/28/03 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3,049.10 dd 02/28/03 FRASER, JOHN 2,485.32 dd 02/28/03 HALWEG, JODI 1,580.33 dd 02/28/03 KATZMAN, BARBARA 1,986.89 dd 02/28/03 MORNING, TIMOTHY 178.00 dd 02/28/03 PARSONS, KURT 2,200.75 dd 02/28/03 ROSSMAN, DAVID 2,469.65 dd 02/28/03 DAWSON, RICHARD 1,628.85 dd 02/28/03 DUELLMAN, KIRK 1, 62 8.85 dd 02/28/03 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 1 dd 02/28/03 NOVA& JEROME 1 62 8.85 dd 02/28/03 PETERSON, ROBERT 1,705.85 dd 02/28/03 SVENDSEN, RONALD 1,646.69 dd 02/28/03 GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE 2 dd 02/28/03 BOYER, SCOTT 1 dd 02/28/03 FEHR, JOSEPH 2,035.03 dd 02/28/03 FLAUGHER, JAYME 11927.94 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 110 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 02/28/03 LAFFERTY, WALTER 2,035.03 dd 02/28/03 LINN, BRYAN 1,795.05 dd 02/28/03 PACOLT, MARSHA 1,999.85 dd 02/28/03 RABINE, JANET 2,099.27 dd 02/28/03 STAHNKE,. JULIE 2,035.03 dd 02/28/03 LUKIN, STEVEN 3,115.54 dd 02/28/03 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 2,487.66 dd 02/28/03 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1 dd 02/28/03 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 268.49 dd 02/28/03 AHL, R. CHARLES 3,764.86 dd 02/28/03 NIVEN, AMY 1,396.23 dd 02/28/03 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,391.25 :dd 02/28/03 WEGWERTH, JUDITH 106.06 dd 02/28/03 BRINK, TROY 1,491.71 dd X02/28/03 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1,874.84 dd 02/28/03 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,737.25 dd 02/28/03 KANE, MICHAEL 2,643.39 dd `02/28/03 LUTZ, DAVID 1,810.26 dd 02/28/03 MEYER, GERALD L816.08 dd 02/28/03 NAGEL, BRYAN 1 dd 02/28/03 OSWALD, ERICK 1,919.15 dd 02/28/03 TEVLIN, TODD 1,729.30 dd 02/28/03 BOHMBACH, JOSHUA 222.30 dd 02/28/03 CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER 2,967.22 dd 02/28/03 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,124.66 dd 02/28/03 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,124.65 dd 02/28/03 PECK, DENNIS 2,218.69 dd 02/28/03 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 2,214.06 dd 02/28/03 SCHACHT, ERIN 2,005.45 dd 02/28/03 VERMEERSCH, CHARLES 1,868.80 dd 02/28/03 ANDERSON, BRUCE 307.47 dd 02/28/03 DOHERTY, KATHLEEN 106.06 dd 02/28/03 MARUSKA, MARK 2,439.86 dd 02/28/03 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1 dd 02/28/03 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,734.25 dd 02/28/03 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1. dd 02/28/03 GREW- HAYMAN, JANET 1,371.58 dd 02/28/03 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2 dd 02/28/03 KOS, HEATHER 542.75 dd 02/28/03 NELSON, JEAN 1 dd 02/28/03 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 1,792.65 dd 02/28/03 COLEMAN, MELINDA 302.46 dd 02/28/03 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 2,558.53 dd 02/28/03 KROLL, LISA 1,016.21 dd 02/28/03 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 866.99 dd 02/28/03 SINDT, ANDREA 1,426.57 110 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 11 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 02/28/03 THOMPSON, DEBRA 657.69 dd 02/28/03 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,270.25 dd 02/28/03 BERGO, CHAD 1,933.93 dd 02/28/03 FINWALL, SHANN 1,945.40 dd 02/28/03 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,535.63 dd 02/28/03 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,346.15 dd 02/28/03 FISHER, DAVID 207.06 dd 02/28/03 SWAN, DAVID 1,415.05 dd 02/28/03 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 2,393.93 dd 02/28/03 ANZALDI, MANDY 801.50 dd 02/28/03 ANZALDI, THOMAS 208.00 dd 02/28/03 BJORK, BRANDON 53.63 dd 02/28/03 DAVISON, LINCOLN 578.00 dd 02/28/03 FINN, GREGORY 1,776.22 dd 02/28/03 FLUG, ELAINE 8 5.5 0 dd 02/28/03 GAETZ, HOLLY 133.00 dd 02/28/03 GRAF, MICHAEL 1,678.82 dd 02/28/03 KELLY, LISA 1,245.78 dd 02/28/03 LUSHANKO, ADAM 42.00 dd 02/28/03 MCBRIDE, PATRICK 100.00 dd 02/28/03 NIEMAN, JAMES 268.00 dd 02/28/03 ROBBINS, AUDRA 1 dd 02/28/03 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2 dd 02/28/03 WHITNEY, ROBERT G 236.00 dd 02/28/03 ZIELINSKI, JOSEPH 99.50 dd 02/28/03 BREHEIM, ROGER 1,738.87 dd 02/28/03 NORDQUIST, RICHARD .1 dd 02/28/03 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 1,867.06 dd 02/28/03 COLEMAN, PHILIP 40.00 dd 02/28/03 CROSSON, LINDA 2,162.18 dd 02/28/03 DIAZ, SUSAN 383.73 dd 02/28/03 EASTMAN, THOMAS 2,345.93 dd 02/28/03 ERICKSON, KYLE 948.61 dd 02/28/03 HERSOM, HEIDI 3 dd 02/28/03 LEIER, SARA 81.65 dd 02/28/03 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 357.37 dd 02/28/03 STAPLES, PAULINE 2,641.74 dd 02/28/03 BADEN, ALISON 63.05 dd 02/28/03 BENDTSEN, LISA 135.00 dd 02/28/03 CORNER, AMY 83.20 dd 02/28/03 ERICKSON, CAROL 43.50 dd 02/28/03 GUZIK, JENNIFER 40.63 dd 02/28/03 HALEY, BROOKE 186.88 dd 02/28/03 HORWATH, RONALD 1,648.82 dd 02/28/03 IRISH, KARL 193.13 dd 02/28/03 KOEHNEN, AMY 2 0.5 5 11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 12 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 02/28/03 KOEHNEN, MARY 477.52 dd 02/28/03 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 337.55 dd 02/28/03 LAWSON, JOSHUA 29.25 dd 02/28/03 MARUSKA, ERICA 49.00 dd 02/28/03 OVERBY, ANNA 72.00 dd 02/28/03 SCHULTZ, PETER 78.00 dd 02/28/03 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 586.25 dd 02/28/03 THOEMKE, MARIE 51.56 dd 02/28/03 GROPPOLI, LINDA 339.86 dd 02/28/03 RENSLOW, RITA 331.65 dd 02/28/03 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 136.33 dd 02/28/03 LONETTI, JAMES 976.92 dd 02/28/03 PRINS, KELLY 950.23 dd 02/28/03 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,653.04 dd 02/28/03 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 282.10 dd 02/28/03 AICHELE, CRAIG 1,744.81 dd 02/28/03 PRIEM, STEVEN 1,950.25 dd :02/28/03 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 1,629.87 dd 02/28/03 HURLEY, STEPHEN 2,687.06 wf 92604 02/28/03 CARDINAL, ROBERT 406.20 wf 92605 02/28/03 WASILUK, JULIE 357.47 Wf 92606 02/28/03 INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS 109.38 wf 92607 02/28/03 KARSTENS, BRAD 50.00 wf 92608 02/28/03 JAHN, DAVID 1,528.64 wf 92609 02/28/03 MALDONADO, JUANA 545.62 Wf 92610 02/28/03 MORIN, TROY 199.75 wf 92611 02/28/03 MATHEYS, ALANA 1,793.85 wf 92612 02/28/03 HANSEN, LORI 1,509.45 Wf 92 613 02/28/03 VIETOR, LORRAINE 1, 62 8.61 wf 92614 02/28/03 PALANK, MARY 1,536.65 wf 92 615 02/28/03 RICHIE, CAROLE L541.26 wf 92616 02/28/03 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1 wf 92617 02/28/03 TICHY, PAMELA 42.00 wf 92618 02/28/03 STEINER, JOSEPH 462.00 wf 92619 02/28/03 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2 wf 92620 02/28/03 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 2,508.24 wf 92621 02/28/03 OLINGER, SHELLEY 1,731.69 wf 92622 02/28/03 FREBERG, RONALD 1,782.46 Wf 92623 02/28/03 JONES, DONALD 104.65 wf 92624 02/28/03 ELIAS, JAMES 2,218.68 wf 92625 02/28/03 TATE, FRANK 904.80 Wf 92626 02/28/03 EDSON, DAVID 2,344.25 wf 92627 02/28/03 GOODRICH, CHAD 210.25 wf 92628 02/28/03 HELEY, ROLAND 2 Wf 92629 02/28/03 HINNENKAMP, GARY 1 wf 92630 02/28/03 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,736.55 12 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 13 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 92631 02/28/03 NAUGHTON, RYAN 45.00 wf 92632 02/28/03 NOVA& MICHAEL 1 wf 92633 02/28/03 BERGREN, KIRSTEN 33.00 .wf 92634 02/28/03 GERNES, CAROLE 325.00 Wf 92635 02/28/03 SUNDE, JOEL 416.00 wf 92636 02/28/03 ANDERSEN, ERIC 24.00 wf 92637 02/28/03 ANDERSON, MIKE 33.00 wf 92638 02/28/03 ANZALDI, KALI 280.50 wf 92639 02/28/03 BANICK, PETER 63.00 wf 92640 02/28/03 BOTHWELL, KRISTIN 188.63 wf 92641 02/28/03 BROZAK, KATHERINE 110.00 wf 92642 02/28/03 CHEZIK, STACEY 13.00 wf 92643 02/28/03 CHOINIERE, ROBERT 52.50 wf 92644 02/28/03 DEGREE, AMANDA 325.13 wf 92645 02/28/03 DEVRIES, LINDSAY 303.00 wf 92646 02/28/03 DRESSEN, EMILY 49.00 wf 92647 02/28/03 FEUCHT, KENNETH 160.00 wf 92648 02/28/03 FRANK, LAURA 312.75 wf 92649 02/28/03 FRANK, SARAH 133.50 wf 92650 02/28/03 GARVEY, ADAM 30.00 wf 92651 02/28/03 GREENER, DOUGLAS 90.00 wf 92652 02/28/03 HABEN, CHARLES 20.00 wf 92653 02/28/03 HAWKES, SCOTT 49.50 wf 92654 02/28/03 HELKAMP, KAYLA 52.00 wf 92655 02/28/03 HJELMGREN, NICOLE 30.00 wf 92656 02/28/03 HOIUM, PHILIP 264.00 wf 92657 02/28/03 HORNER, JAY 143.00 wf 92658 02/28/03 JAWORSKI, ERIC 13.50 wf 92659 02/28/03 JOHNSON, ALEXANDER 60.00 wf 92660 02/28/03 JOHNSON, SARA 19.50 wf 92 661 02/28/03 KLEM, AMANDA 39.00 wf 92662 02/28/03 KLEM, JOSH 100.00 wf 92663 02/28/03 KRIER, JOHN 22.00 wf 92664 02/28/03 KURYSH, MICHELE 45.00 wf 92665 02/28/03 LARSON, RYAN 44.00 wf 92666 02/28/03 LIUKONEN, SHAWN 33.00 wf 92667 02/28/03 MICK, KYLE 22.00 wf 92668 02/28/03 MILLER, SHELBY 13.00 wf 92669 02/28/03 O'GRADY, ZACHARY 13.00 wf 92670 02/28/03 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 352.94 wf 92671 02/28/03 RAJAN, RAJIU 22.00 wf 92672 02/28/03 RAYE, HOLLY 26.00 wf 92673 .02/28/03 ROSE, JOSH 130.00 wf 92674 02/28/03 SHOBERG, KARI 182.00 wf 92675 02/28/03 SIKORA, JACOB 48.00 wf 92676 02/28/03 SIKORA, PAUL 75.00 13 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 14 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 92677 02/28/03 TARR -JR, GUS 87.50 Wf 92678 02/28/03 YORKOVICH, BRADLEY 102.50 wf 92679 02/28/03 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,746.68 Wf 92680 02/28/03 HAAG, MARK 1,575.86 wf 92681 02/28/03 NADEAU, EDWARD 2,643.39 Wf 92682 02/28/03 BEHR, HEATHER 142.00 Wf 92683 02/28/03 BROWN, LAURIE 198.80 Wf 92684 02/28/03 DISKERUD, HEATHER 270.10 Wf 92685 02/28/03 GLASS, JEAN 1 wf 92686 02/28/03 HOIUM, SHEILA 986.63 Wf 92687 02/28/03 JACK, NICOLE 237.85 Wf 92688 02/28/03 MOFFAT, ETHAN 236.80 Wf 92689 02/28/03 MOY, PAMELA 391.02 Wf 92690 02/28/03 PARTLOW, JOSHUA 332.56 Wf 92691 02/28/03 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 1,643.88 Wf 92692 02/28/03 SHOBERG, CARY 784.77 Wf 92693 `02/28/03 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 59.20 wf 92694 02/28/03 LINGER, MARGARET 711.77 Wf 92695 02/28/03 ABRAHAMSON, DANIEL 89.83 wf 92696 02/28/03 ANDERSON, CALEB 175.50 wf 92697 02/28/03 BRENEMAN, NEIL 339.11 wf 92698 02/28/03 CASSELTON, JANE 58.50 wf 92699 02/28/03 CHAPMAN, JENNY 426.88 wf 92700 02/28/03 COSTA, JOSEPH 213.68 Wf 92701 02/28/03 DIERICH, ANDREA 46.58 Wf 92702 02/28/03 DOTY, JANET 320.81 Wf 92703 02/28/03 DUNN, RYAN 368.63 Wf 92704 02/28/03 FENGER, JUSTIN 565.56 Wf 92705 02/28/03 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 21.20 wf 92706 02/28/03 FINNEGAN, KAREN 108.00 Wf 92707 02/28/03 FONTAINE, ANTHONY 103.75 wf 92708 02/28/03 FONTAINE, KIM 706.05 Wf 92709 02/28/03 GRANT, MELISSA 108.04 wf 92710 02/28/03 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 256.20 Wf 92711 02/28/03 HOULE, DENISE 208.00 Wf 92712 02/28/03 IRISH, GRACE 223.50 wf 92713 02/28/03 JOHNSON, ROBERT 301.57 wf 92714 02/28/03 JOVONOVICH, TODD 66.00 Wf 92715 02/28/03 JOYER, MARTI 66.03 wf 92716 02/28/03 KROLL, MARK 96.00 wf 92717 02/28/03 LINDSTROM, AMANDA 45.50 wf 92718 02/28/03 MATHISEN -JR, DEAN 525.00 wf 92719 02/28/03 MCMAHON, MELISSA 174.83 wf 92720 02/28/03 MELCHER, ROBERT 104.00 wf 92721 02/28/03 MISEMER, BENJAMIN 52.00 wf 92722 02/28/03 MOES, EMILIA 207.40 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 15 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 92723 02/28/03 O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE 97.38 wf 92724 02/28/03 OLSON, MARGRET 48.75 wf 92725 02/28/03 OTTESON, JANET 54.00 .wf 92726 02/28/03 OWEN, JONATHAN 125.00 wf 92727 02/28/03 PEHOSKI, JOEL 102.90 wf 92728 02/28/03 PROESCH, ANDY 157.20 wf 92729 RENSTROM, KEVIN 219.75 wf 92730 02/28/03 RODEN, JASON 110.25 wf 92731 02/28/03 SMITLEY, SHARON 329.00 wf 92732 02/28/03 TUPY, HEIDE 108.00 wf 92733 02/28/03 TUPY, MARCUS 267.45 wf 92734 02/28/03 WAGNER, ERIC 220.00 wf 92735 02/28/03 WARNER, CAROLYN 134.40 wf 92736 02/28/03 WEDES, CARYL 125.10 Wf 92737 02/28/03 WHITE, NICOLE 318.38 wf 92738 02/28/03 WINEGAR, JILL 18.00 wf 92739 02/28/03 WOODMAN, ALICE 20.00 wf 92740 02/28/03 BOSLEY, CAROL 220.80 wf 92741 02/28/03 ESALA, HOPE 40.63 wf 92742 02/28/03 HAGSTROM, EMILY 36.00 wf 92743 02/28/03 KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE 130.00 wf 92744 02/28/03 ODDEN, JESSICA 30.00 wf 92745 02/28/03 OIE, REBECCA 51.00 wf 92746 02/28/03 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 276.25 wf 92747 02/28/03 VAN HALE, PAULA 68.25 wf 92748 02/28/03 BEHAN, JAMES 1 wf X92749 02/28/03 CHIGINSKY, APRIL 246.05 wf 92750 02/28/03 COLLINS, ASHLEY 169.58 wf 92751 02/28/03 DOBLAR, STEVE 123.03 wf 92752 02/28/03 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,045.18 wf 92753 02/28/03 ECKER, JOHN 29.48 Wf 92754 02/28/03 KYRK, ASHLEY 30.20 wf 92755 02/28/03 LOGAN, HEATHER 25.40 wf 92756 02/28/03 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,258.22 wf 92757 02/28/03 PIEPER, THEODORE 50.80 wf 92758 02/28/03 SARPONG, SEAN 142.48 wf 92759 02/28/03 SCHULZE, BRIAN 224.00 wf 92760 02/28/03 SEVERSON, HOLLY 67.05 wf 92761 02/28/03 YOUNG, MATTHEW 41.70 wf 92762 02/28/03 ZIEMER, NICOLE 27.40 wf 92763 02/28/03 MULVANEY, DENNIS 1 407,925.45 15 Agenda No. A�` Action by Council AGENDA REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: February 27, 2003 Richard Fursman City Manager . )A- Sherrie Le Human Resource Director SUBJECT: Paramedic Call Pay for Paid - per -call Firefighters Rej�cLed The Fire Department will be supplementing the Police Department's paramedic response as suggested in the Fire Study prepared by Mercer and Associates. We have a few paid - per -call firefighters who are certified paramedics. We wish to increase the call pay when these certified paramedics respond to a call and are assigned to work as paramedics. This increased pay will apply only when these individuals are assigned as a paramedic for the call. Other calls they respond to will be paid at the standard call rate. RECOMMENDATION We request approval of a new rate of $25 per call for paid - per -call firefighters, who are certified paramedics, when assigned as a paramedic. G t AGENDA ITEM r AGENDA REPORT Action by CouncH TO: City Manager FROM: Ed Nadeau, Utility/VEM Superintendent ;.. Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director.6cwFS. SUBJECT: Sewer Television Inspection DATE: March 3, 2003 Introduction The Public Works Utility Division annual) budgets funds for ' Y g television inspection of approximately 75,000 lineal feet of sanitary sewer mains. Background Quotes were requested and submitted by two contractors: Veit and Company, ' per ' p y, Inc. bid puce was 34 cents p lineal foot and Pipe Services Corporation bid price was 335 cents er Lineal foot. ot. Recommendation Request City Council authorization to enter in - to a contract with Pipe Services Corporation for the annual televising project. EN jW AGENDA ITEM 9,4 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Ed Nadeau, Utility/VEM Superintendent Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Staff Vehicle Purchase DATE: February 27, 2003 Introduction Action by Council NIT Rejected The 2003 Public Works capital outlay budget includes funds for replacement of two 2 1995 staff cars. Background Both 1995 staff cars have high mileage. Our vehicle replacement schedule was p used to determine replacement. The state bid price from Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet to re lace both cars is $24,751.88, including 'will g tax, license and registration. The 1995 staff cars will be sold at state auction. Recommendation Request City Council authorization to enter into a contract with Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet, under State Contract 430025, for the purchase of two (2) hevrolet Malibu bu four - door sedans and dispose of two (2) 1995 Ford Taurus at state auction. EN AGENDA ITEM yk AGENDA RE Action by Coun PORT ` TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager Date -� ]Ell�7. . --- FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of PublicWorks /City Engineer e Al 0 (11 i a d Re ectcd SUBJECT: Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District: Approval of Three Resolutions: pp 3 () 1) Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Consolidation with Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District; 2) Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement Dissolution; 3) Approving Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Boundary Change DATE: March 3, 2003 Introduction and Background On February 24, 2003, the City Council received a presentation from the South Washington Watershed District and the Ramsey-Washington y Washington Metro Watershed District regarding dissolving the .East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. The very outhern art of Maplewood i ry p p s within the East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization (EMWMO). This EMWMO organization has done little if any watershed planning or implementation since its formation in 1983 and is not currently complying with state law. The EMWMO is a joint powers a reement that the cit g y i s part of. The attached resolutions implement the direction given on February 4, 2003 officia y dissolving the EMWMO. ' Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the three (3) resolutions: • Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Consolidation with Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District; + Approving East Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement Dissolution; • Approving Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District Boundary Change e g RCA Attachment: 3 Resolutions EAST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION CONSOLIDATION WITH RAMSEY WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHED DISTRICT RESOLUTION NUMBER Resolution by the City of Maplewood concurring with the petition to add or transfer territory to the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District. RECITALS: 1. That the City of Maplewood has jurisdiction over the territory of the East Mississippi Water Management Organization (East Mississippi WMO) 2. That the East Mississippi WMO has not adopted a water management plan as required by statute. g p q 3. That the territory of the East Mississippi WMO is not large enough to exist as its own watershed district. 4. That to allow for the most efficient use of resources and accomplish the statutory rY purposes for which the East Mississippi WMO was created, the territory of the East Mississippi WMO should be added to the existing amse Washin ton g y g Metro Watershed District. 5. That the Boundary Change Petition prepared by the South Washington Watershed District has been reviewed by the City Council, and subject to the terms and conditions of paragraph 7 of said Petition, the City of Maplewood concurs with said Petition. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Maplewood is in concurrence with the Boundary Change Petition of the South Washington Watershed District to be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources. Adopted this 10t day of March, 2003. Mayor Attest: City Manager EAST MISSISSIPPI WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT DISSOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. Resolution by the City of Maplewood to terminate the Joint Powers Agreement of a St. Paul Park, Maplewood, Newport, Woodbury, Cottage Grove and Grey Cloud Island Township Water Mana Bement Organization. Resolution by the City of Maplewood to terminate the East Mississippi Water Management Organization. RECITALS: 1. That the City of Maplewood entered into a Joint Powers Agreement between the cities of St. Paul Park, Maplewood, Newport, Woodbury, Cottage Grove and Gre y Cloud Island Township, Minnesota to establish a water management organization. 2. That the Joint Powers Agreement was adopted by all of the affected units of government pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.59. 3. That the affected units of government have determined that the continuation of the Joint Powers Agreement is unnecessary, and that simultaneous with the adoption of this Resolution, a separate Resolution is being adopted to add or transfer territory covered by the - Joint Powers Agreement to an existing watershed district. 4. That Section VII of the Joint Powers Agreement allows for immediate dissolution of the Joint Powers Agreement upon unanimous agreement of all p arties. 5. That all parties have agreed to dissolve the Joint Powers Agreement and the commission created there under. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD that the Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment of a St. Paul Park Maplewood, Newport, Woodbury, p p Cottage Grove and Grey Cloud Island Township Water Management Organization, commonly eferred to as the y East Mississippi WMO, shall be dissolved. Adopted this 10 day of March, 2003. Mayor Attest: City Manager RAMSEY WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHED DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE RESOLUTION NO. Resolution by the City of Maplewood concurring with the petition to add or transfer territory to the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District. RECITALS: 1. The City of Maplewood has jurisdiction over the territory identified to be added or transferred from one WMO to another WMO. 2. That the territory drains to the abutting district and is more appropri ately included within the abutting watershed districts /water management organization. 3. That the territory changes are technical in nature, and are the result of study and review conducted by the district since its creation: 4." That the Boundary Change Petition prepared by the South Washington Watershed District has been reviewed by the City Council and the City of Maplewood concurs with said petition. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Maplewood is in concurrence with the Boundary Change Petition of the South Washington Watershed District to be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources. Adopted this 10 day of March, 2003. Mayor City Manager Attest: AGENDA ITEM AGENDA Acti,'n by Council ' REPORT � TO: City Ma D FROM: Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer ineer Al' i= Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director Rejected SUBJECT: Landscape Ecology Awards Program, LEAP -- Acce p t Award DATE: March 3, 2003 Introduction On February 20, 2003, the City of Maplewood was presented with a LEAP Award Land ( scape Ecology Awards Program) from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District Natural Resources Board. Assistant City Engineer Chris Cavett was resent to accept the award p p and on behalf of the city. Y• c The City of Maplewood had been nominated for the city's rain . , y nwater garden program as recognition for using practices that improve or preserve water quality and natural resources in the . Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District. The city was presented with an "Award Winner" and sign and a Y g $25 gift certificate from Prairie Restorations. The city council will consider accepting the award and g ift certificate. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council accept the LEAP Award and $25 gift certificate. It is recommended that both the yard sign and gift certificate be utilized at the Maplewood. Nature Center. AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: i r ` AGENDA ITEM Action by Council City Manager Bill Priefer, , Public Works Administrative Assistant Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works /City Engineer Dial Tone Agreement Renewal March 3, 2003 a..-a. .; d Rejected The dial tone agreement with our current vendor, McLeod USA, is due for renewal. Written quotations were requested and were received from McLeod USA and Eschelon Telecom, Inc. Background McLeod USA submitted a quote of $4,091.10 per month or $49 093.20 for a o - one-year period. Eschelon Telecom, Inc. submitted a quote of $4,651.26 per month or $55,815.12 for -.a one-year period. Eschelon Telecom's quote also included one . time installation charges of $2,360. McLeod USA's quote did not include nor require installation charges as their equipment was installed when we signed the original agreement in January 2000. The quoted monthly cost is what,we are currently paying. However, this cost will decrease to approximately $3,599 per month when caller identification equipment is installed with the new phone system. Qwest, the dominant dial tone supplier in this market, declined to submit a uote as the have q y ea difficult time competing against co- locaters like McLeod USA and Eschelon Telecom, Inc. Additionally, many of the other co- locaters in the market today are experiencing financial difficulties which puts them in a less than competitive position. -- Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the renewal of McLeod USA's dial tone service agreement for $4,091.10 per month for a period of one year. WJ P jw AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO. FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Introduction City Manager Action by Council. DC. Chuck Vermeersch, Civil Engineer I Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director /City Engineer - Rejected Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfacin g, Project 03 -02 a. Public Hearing 7:00 pm b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes) March 3, 2003 The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:00 p.m., Monday, March 10, 2003. Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility study dy has been - provided as a. supplement to the council packet. The stud includes information on the he proposed improvement, proposed financing and probable assessments. The city ouncil should i the improvement Y ould consider ordering provement following the public hearing. Background The city council ordered the preparation of this feasibility stud at the December 23 . Y , 2002, regular meeting. An informational letter was - sent to the property owners adjacent to the J proposed project. An informational meeting was held February 19, 2002, to discuss the ro' p Ject with residents and business owners. Only two business representatives attended this meeting. g J Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering the improvement of the Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfacing, Pr 02. Y g, y Project 03- Budget Impact The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $444,852. The financing an i g p s outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from two sources: assessments and city general tax levy. Staff will also pursue some cost participation from the Metropolitan Council (Metro Transit) for the park and ride. However, the city has no authority to assess the property , as-it is on the T. H.61 right -of -way. CJV Attachment: Resolution Site Plan RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 24th day of February, 2003, fixed a date for a- council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the Maplewood Drive West/Keller Parkway Resurfacing, City Project 03 -02, AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks ublished notice of the hearing g was given, and the hearing was duly held on March 10, 2003, and the council has heard all persons desiring - to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to Maplewood Drive West and Keller Parkway, City Project 03 -02. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 10th day of March 2003. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is here b Y directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $444,852 shall be est g established. The proposed financing plans is as follows: Assessments $202,439 City General Tax Levy $242,413 Total $444,852 >: < a:r ::.::.?•<,, 3; sx�4'ii k ast/ „ �.« ..,.,a ♦ \ / / .;� I ,. rpt I a ?L# . a.... = zf., few t - ''.aw.t,.a.:='rr:7P:ias� `pec .:z"� ♦ \ > / / /.' ,y >< ""'r.,. ..r>„.-3{`.=�'•f` / y fir+ f• � a. c% •�,. < ] „ x/Z ,t t ,F Yfs- vc x:.£"!.:Y .. >... 9w.w:: :^„ s t•7:x• d rs>xi1'.A3. \ � / ,. .. .. !<.7!3ix ;, s''a '�<E s;. �, "S:iE`• c€.:..: d,.:ar ..,r .. . <fsi \ y : ti IE' i `1--.. .: :?.. ss c< .a / '/ .-# >l.` :Y• , • E.. iY_ :i'a< �'F••i:i'i<fr..:; r ::ru f: `t.. 'Es'.'Y a. c.... .. .. r ] t < ..£ n.s...a:. a: ,''F£'✓,.t.:;:`£v.,ua"�x?w..f, .<L. . r.. t : M' -< :W w 1 / / - _ r .. / x;<. 4.`.� 'ru?i '-x:`: d?lx,<�xt<ty?'�,,. < .. .> ,. .r ,'• ,. .: a ',xt •d f ::i - : ,, ,:....,.. x .E� t x. \ \ / / t ....� ixQk.I.E..x tq<tr ..s..'q:.e t:%.:..3H<:,. ::'kz,;`., !* .,-"'z - x: .'. r' ix / /t .. `ti �¢i.2{t.r• - :r x �t:df>� ;•,ci tx _,iE -, Fi:i; i :: :.,.: . SL :s. .>??d s$tf-•i(Y:•d^'.frst<4p�_^Y r - - , yet .„ i\'i«.... a. ,.. sC: ,:":. w '<& <. r: ?.. . I` / k f " ,." ii.?:': iai = . "Y:t«.,:2i`-<: >S: -A ...r ...:.. tt x:x:.l.fS...: �;.�.,�>Z€, .3. 32L�' 1 / : , - v � +>�,; 33,S tq.... r. �. ' .<. .� � :nY� :t.< : � ..:# :•:., ,F�13ii . � �? �t"'�_-x•'. �'a f<ra �1 / � ,.`s s Ri f gg �� � / -al :%:r... C z r:> t.:, tt�,{S':s' : f'l,%41 Lf ..,tiv'. Hi a •.>;ic... x:>:.ati .. r 1 , },'.st I <i <�,c - / n t . .:: •':ibR'',.....:r-:K�.�.s... t... 7f}} .„45 .t' ] _ fid' _ ... !/I" %,* , ,'i.Y'....Y, ' .^f - f::XY]' r x ..N• .^•' v�',' h/ '�P!' '/ ..).":: .. J xt• ...k'�1F;<xi._'�.,?�.:•!v%�.,uy •tr" . <,. ,ta�y�� � „, ,�, r3 ,�,_ %.. / / .- f:: x € rf I'> I % ! r, �w a 1 •:vj-- - ..,[:'4 Y p iY 'A' �i<S <', >'S.' .fL' .......... S•:v . X eP. L3'". x.r! '. .3";» �l[i<"€%"'. 1 €i' r =�'f. .fq 1r -Y 1 < < k w. '.Fi' • . ?�tcd ffiu r, ]sc�`Yi'Lt•' >f •.. . X4'•1' �> r. xS / „_! f .> ; .. ...:..',:'.."..r,!••.'k':^: z;rn,,,is :x:'iX" ...,:. >£•`€f:o _x1^ 3.e'.<, S%' x. _ ! /�1 '.twEN <•> r ,..x.x <. ... w s� ...,xx 1� ,td'<d L 8 ..,. x. sti Kcs .r s '� ,[,..:. . 2".'�:g]i t ?fc'°:"' • . _ . - r, .:a'Ft`?:"'./•.63.� ! / .'ts «I 5.•. "�!pta Y ' J /..3 ;? {'i,'a:� �•x � .fesR ,_.g�'••'t, `�' ' / s' ! / ! ! r :2r a;f ..:<:"'�' ./'^'([� ..S:t°�?s sff >'F:;y / E f, ' .F s f3-,' %:`v'.i:i3i'ita• •` �"r%:-^I.. , T'x:. t'.f' „ .Ti„^,d _ • L _ .. ! / „ > y ' ' _ _ t ': s3 '.. : , imfs''1: -<..., a''v'>x�.`«�"c r<RR .fie t ..-:°a. ,<� / / - :,_>' _ / // !/ -.C, "#�':.-,P2.dx -'W L'• '-"t.. s.•Y:n .: • ?f' < t •� '` �14y . « Y ?<t I {.,. «,,: F ..ter. ::^ s ,... Y " d - ! ! / ! I I y..r til2 v x{t`s ,- .,.:,1. b / ' - - ,tm»%.3. t:..- :. 'r , ' _f ,x �: ` <:x...;, .r'.••il. Y�':?sf'>.....i+.'fYw ]'�«�aa.'',*-c,.?Rs': ,/'v`'Fix.;:§-< ^.x 2,F:". 3 "?d. :r y <,t. ''''�{ a "M No �.>o_ ^ax.•q.;tt . •..2.{j / /dxYd, '-'�a`,4 •r • r a A u'• sw t i,x «Zf' altar 'f E... / / ! r.zL:> 141 Si 'ff%, .i{?' ' 'S4f` ".srF` :i .l / / i•x • ' . rro ...., '�• tic .,.� / / .,. _ : z;'"[': <.`.>ftx ,, .3 .: .. � �`,R^ '�v__�,' .',f. :='t `F " ` r'r n °Ps€ .c /^...>. a .....:asr.�?:[.r.'t','t.. 8 :,,,4-...S;x' f . ?r ,ra' _ 7ax:;-Y ,. /..':,.,s. ... w4i ..3"x.:"f<,`•f {°a`s'c�,.{ / / �'^'«-..v, ' '$ as$ wzr. ' k' r. .:EEft ' ! / ! N ,2{ '�'}�q : s ,r^. s:�.. �x'. ty!.•�. C'.#� 'xr r /?IEK s / /' `„ r �" .a..£rr >w r -"t% .f _ 1. y/ !! / / / 3x�y�I t - ! // ;: it /! / / �/ f t w r 7i -- L< c/'•:a, A,. as: �1y'{.y ! / r`,, .. aY F . s. x, .,.{t .i::: 3..,: / I / /! 3 t �.: E:F>."*.s.,�;,,tSYLt�'^ a'3tt�°','XS"`�t / I/w'..<.1,. ->a' +3`"• 1 _ .�'v ' / ! / / I.;t.., y 3f '? r.£€>2„i y?yam�f1[f ^zt'.' .�x-.'.-�']'Y ! , _ � g / i'1. .'.' :. , � £ .fKnr II //!/ J U-stin IN 7 <.i'3... _ / moi"6 �•�. / { <. . 1 :f.. �.#>. / s i ,a, ?i:: d: Y > ar�o `:':::..i., :. / f !...E,.>` i. _: ,fie / rw=. t / I ia, . & . , c * ,.. / , CO A5 ...'-, _AM� `„II, ------------------------------ ,I------------ a1�------------------ -------------------- ------ y ------ -- ii rear 1 ;;r;,� „ I 1 / 11 I 1:1 04, -✓ "z i'c sr'a`�l I iris - Y I , .t:t I ;7- s ^; i- I a:_ I I .1 ! .aC. -. Cyt'• I > ..I I I , > I 1 / / ! 11 `a:/3,.rx' i E1. :e'�`uw r. t01, 1 iy mt ` k i I i. \\ 1 I i` 4 1 fits: .^ Tm_ .,., I i ii r i 1 :,-. I f f I I ? I :dam r 1 I 11 t.11 r { f + }.,, 1 r 1 1 • l I I I JJ J t f »a 3 t 1 11 7 I i I 1! e f,.=�S"'li zi 1 I tsf,11 I I / / 3 3', {,Na r H <*s w 3>a S I :`-�,,<aL•, I s {. ,# A I t. , + 1 1 r 1 /'♦ ',�",3�'•"' I I �; I I I ,. I r- '� E- I 1\-t t f I I I i -- ----�' ' K x 1 1 I I Iry I i d r \ \'t. i I.f 1 E r/ 1/ -------- ry, - -I I +� I ; 00Lj I1mo,,�.,- ", i "- . \ v 1 �1 f I ; r 1 aR �'� \ - I I�qv 1 1 1 ° 1" �i W^s ! -M q •`t- !' I ai {- '< , , \ _ i 1 t. 1 e�,aga _F! t€£1`.,x°Icry ,[? / ' 1 I I IJ'Sm'` ` 4tgz 1 V, •'� 3 ? t� ri 'i" - - ; , - --\ -t � t - _. - _ - - _ - - I �r -!' 9. !v�,��.� 1 F 't'� €I".'i'dfie ! / 1- ��,,.t..,-.� �- - - - j 1 - �� I ff t`t� kr. sx s�t : '° M. I I - 1 5 I • _ _ - - - - - - - I,as, {<.. 1 ---•1 _' ,'` s F • / , - - - - 1 ' ' $i Ei `•" -r' 6E� >,{ �E . sI h� i 3 ! - / I I 1 �• 1 tz xs" i-'7�:' y < ^, < I .�" 1 f r 4 t - p \ i.. LF �-'"•L . t� _ ( I 1 { I .:axtii 1 V M�N. I a;Yd ,,,,� 1i;.,A< 'rt e ' ' /' / / 1 1 'i 1 .. T. �\ 'L� '�12 ..:-�>,�I I n ' i? � � Ilei ` I I I 1 .fflI �. f ��"A`: s i "� I Yr r>°` 5.� * r / / 1 1 r.. �t I 2fIV �•` �\k `y\ \>-J' �• _ I /1{S ?1 r :;• w t /+-__ \.- ---• / 11 I aj��31�I f ftb '.' cf f _ i z 1; . r:.Yr,`.€.€s y < '/ / <- •. - \ - _ - _ - - /'' / I I `Nft 1 � _ !i i�< l: 1 1 1 y. aI �` 1 !I .i:y I t7 �' / • ra Z 3x li . i f t s_v 1 e°atef'`I, 3 I ,•; �j, • - I - - / / 1 I ! - - - �: I I I I F''xa. / ! to u>t3i, 3114, I • . . a ` \ - ., , / I 1 :: 1 f I?j lin � ff .r- 1 , 1 l 1 I , ! , :M lEl-l- �: 1 Fx is : L ` \ / I 1 �.. I f j ' xf .:F { !' I f 1 I ::qth y 4 % 1 i.. c < / . �^ S g 1 I "^:s` -.k "`"'1_ l^��if , i ",.,:./ / 1 I t;,•3•. 1 1 �T f l: r 1 I I i i» I i -TZ"F 1 1s I t irIR3 j{ / I ! l / / / / / i ar,'. 1...,".t<Kf•c. 3 I 1 I -_ t ,�. t 9v;l 1 le. `s z` „/ ! I I -- 1 1 I fp a' I I.; f f I I / i// 'ii k / r1. - I I;`r: I`�11. 1 I f f ,' / . �>•`.r< . t� I`h" /_ .-------\ ,•-------- M I ------- ;'i: JIl I // g's - s { i `It c a:,_Y I I I I , I -. fl.I ) r) /. -. i 1 G;»�.R t I [ I 1 1 is ? 'ffm P�1;! 11 r <s.; l,gLfNNOt TL _y Ii z:f rff:.i " 1 1 :::.,_,.....,... _.._.:_;;..._ _...;;..,,...__._... l 1 I I If;»f ./ / '11, ) I tr'a. <..`.a "'Ni; R, < ��. .. -:::..].:.:•:::::;.::z.. _ _ _ _ 1 1 I I J J/ W: m`'� '1' 1 1 '. -- I I 1 1 I I ! 1 /'I I J J 1 I >110- Ys tc .. _,. _ I 1 1 I u . ; f. '% I ! / ! I i-sgff :.. 1 f:::^ - .......... ..... p.j t::tts> :' .M ; `I \ '; ,,..,: ,:•:•:-:., ,_..:' - _ - - tr I I I 1 •`:r1<! ! 1 _. _.._.. ;: ki.. i> Vit.. 1 -- I 1 - . 1 /-,Y'! I I ! �h � - I t J r: ,....... . s r.Yift , R - MsrxL',�. I - 1 r ) - I I { % 4 I _ _ % f 7a" 1 1 _i: , 1 - I ]E<.> VV�� 1 / 3_,.. . r - t 1 - �`^ Tit :Emn �.�0�5,t... - I ) xf1 1 ::.:::.::_ ::.,:.i ,.,.. ..._• .t:~:;;.: r: - 1 ';i1. / ...::........ ?'It,<.<.>'.';.''.•""H]kfr;rSKsr 1 '':.. : .::...:: ei.' :': - �cEa-c;:-:1P.. ' 1 ( u.... . •.. ...... , . : %"k,_-' " ". ,,,- `iP 1 f'. i''":ir.::• ii:.. . i:.:'"' - -_ 1 I I 1 .1 _ _ - - - - {; . / I /, I :r i,:..y..A..E.•,li:.'mss \ i'r . _ '':i i I /l i%s� ..iii': " .. ... .<:tea '' _ 1 -_ / .,;.:e, : _ ^- .. Y :. r:;::: ( <�t :..:.: rats: �f nn i'42a% . ... ... :. •. I - - - ! / ! x_ae x-< ..<.. v, ... . ,. .. - . .. : r.. :::• : I lWav >:•,:Hrt,''tJ i'. , r -;&,-:;::i i=.. > ::::. - - _Twp _ .. <t< 1 1 i I I / f4z�i t :......::..:....... :. •: - • - is 'i i , / It ift... iM ... . ::........... : i.:'i _ : ^.....r {: .,........ .............. --/� i` ' - - _ i.. . , t /' iia ... - .]. ..... .... E '. R . c .Y�,L, ...... ............ ....... ... ....,......, . ! I .. ...]......]... .......,.... .. .. .. .. ....... _ _ 1 / s z". .Iitf _ I . to ^. .... 1... ...................•.. ...;, :: ::... •'� / .•::•:•..:.................»•:::: •::::::.........,...:•, :._....,.__._.......:.._,....:,r...:ai-•:- ` :: <:-::<`: C . t : C: < 3]:: <• �� . ,,:`.^etN�." £,< �,`' .` :... ] :.i ::::::::;:::r :.....<s........::•::r.:, h .:. 4:.:?::•.:::. ,r.:x :ra.:]:::>:.: •. xi::::-r.� :.:::•?eY.xare+:..._e- 3 /Si ;i. ! I I / ..:.Y-�. `u' :.<> .< S 1 :::. c x . :: ...::•'.:::.::::...... ...... ........r_. :..:.:_. - ._..._... ... .... .r.),..; .....::'a::.... - 1 > S . ...�.1; . _ a4. a :C ,.-,q'•tf<. ":9 .......... . ... ...... ..3_........ ... _._.::.:::!' :�:)L......•.: >; r,d'�..... •=',F.::•::]:T £: :.>:>� ::i"i: :ii;i i'."%:•'' ,I. / . ..........._ ......,.,: ; ::...:- i ' . .. - - _ I . Ria I ! >.d ! / / �/ iE::._,;s.....,..,.xttS]>:] ,...: E.a::c:.:.•:.,....._...... - J ! .... ..°gdK.f�£g✓ r........._...._..... .__.... ,_>:x:::::•:•. ..,.-:c.:::]•c:.-:.::-.er ��°�:�':?:�-f1 i?'r.Y":. y• �:..:. I L'.:--'%'-.: .._.._.u.,t.�_lKl.i .. •.'°xifI <£fi[{�. / \. .._._..,..i: jiE�a:f5:�, G'�E'ci?t:ii� «:•c•i:c:::.:,c,:t,::r=:iiia :r. ! / .../ / �s<i'JS.: x. \ - .. _ _ _ sti'. E: / / I` .!, J 1 1 I / . _ : r r `'' K� :ii.,':::l:lf?:•v,.•:' •�ti>:::::i":::i:i::::Hj:i:':::: �L:.:�:�':::S:x:::1::i'::':3:- _" 1. ..: "•!t,L�, •:..::::........-.. .. ; .._.......>x ::•r:::::•':::.:>.: - - :;:xj::::ii] / 3' d - - :�' / / , "!t'.. I I /:•y,pl, Ww -/ ?` _f. . ..:_r . ....................... i.::. .. : _..,.r.... ....... _..:...:. i .. I I I \ R k. r i• tKt, ::,.,..,..- :: ...........-.....,..»q....:i: ]::: .:. ?sf;........::. / / > • of E , 4 z�AT ...:..:_ .:.._-:.__...: j .t i !. I v fi� : t . 1 ! M 11£ ...._... .,.. .._. ... 3:!:r::: •:: •:_•:.'n::'�"::,......... Y ^Stir, 1. V .. ....... .... _.. ... _.... ::Sar• ,.�::..,..:: ♦ .'' ,:v.`.. / / / "'1': "'t'1(<.<'' ur. :-• u:•.:_:_= :r:: : ............i.;i; ::,is?' : ?si:i:ii•-::::=]»•L4.:;;if;i]?? ! ! a Mgr u: ..._ ......... ....... i - ' ........t:••..' K : aw:•::_r:• .. ::.: ..... <. _:' is>' t , , fx<' x�,. L"�y : ............_._..,...... :;,:i,ii,'s *.... :>'s:':. / t]i�st:tui:,:>i^i?. \ -.1: x....':::• :::" ,.._... _....:::x:.,fEiF?: •'.'::E? fiif??::F:;Ft ? I , ! / / ;yam... _:,:.._.:.:.:..........._............................................_......_. -- c......................................... .`f a. ♦�. ...............>::5::?: -.k.* :::];::,:: r ni:>t.ii:iiiiiSEi:s.^:::ism'e ?:i :Yi:_2::'r i•::: :::::?:c•ii.?:3>e: •_,,_4F �> :'�'s %•:�f<.r ! ! :x ?,bad \�;' \. ]t . ..... .... I Tfl iix_.r..:,r.... t 11 1 F'S.: .`,. f v ..\.. - •:::•::::: 't'•rP_'iS ? _ c .:,S:i..' _iF.,.r�.... - - - - - - - - _ _ - / / .- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " 1........... :..:iL'. is - ' -.rc:raT - - - - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ '!:' �% . t. """E �. ':^ :r:. .... ..... Cur<. -. .� .� --------- -- /1; I ,E -- - a / ..�. ..:.. ......:' X. i ........... r ::s•::...„... ............._ ...... _ - - - e ix^:baesa iv' , `v r :. , ... s?i '.' ::•-:_ i :.:::: tt - >- xaa w ' t xg . ... / \'';�. '.''-:. :.,........: •i:: ?.:::.: :-.::::. ':,:::"::: rte' /',..:/ / / / / ! :: sat ...... ... : T H r: :/' :" 11 1 b :: i :,kk�'�.',•m2x�c: "2°'. .:. 1 :. ' - ' y., y / / 1 1 'aa �,t� :' ,.. 3„�„� e' : •• '"\...:\ , . .:'.ir f ... •:. ;; '< . i. y, / / / / / 1 • SwfNtYoC 7m' g€a2P..,.etx>M"''n' s.: .s£ iz}«;,? ';i . ' 't. <r• . \..;: \ .. ..: f ?..::' ' :::' :' . %". c >n ir. / I f y<•g, .P,t LI"c : <,t.0 .1x;1,7..E' r 'z ]_. is ... .. . . ..... .. ............ ... a €'fie / J ».,��.<..F<�,,�x .h;r,i . ) ,r ,>] s?.;i .�C ` :- .: ..,SN'H•t .> a- ,. ....:::: , ..: rr :::. {' Yvi� I -:•.,"I ' / f::... , F] < P•.•,: ::Yt et£ .:.•i '.i ] _ ,� �, t-' "'p... ,-..tx Vr•< •x / / ! I 1 aTn _ (>Ss:.] t ro < ... - / ,/ •:.' / / I t(Y::•>a`77•A`..a,asi^»vj$.Yef's::.K: .xt 3a �x. xZ.,$i'.�'.n,'t ,t�.'N`,',p`,. S:;f'. : .. . ml F n I ;•:. ..:a6,..<d %yv' f;f ./�'/ / /' / / l 1 1 ^.:Y,' ;.J. ::`2H:t$ Q;,, , '.,, ... :: ':"�.`s''3c<:sl / 1 / 1 ?'%; 1• i I jif - -z- " v I'la [; ,moi .];.. }�, .` - ../ / / 1. ' ♦ / / \ \ 7 k , jil�,q 12 i3.; r `^x ,3r,{ a f '.$] �. � `:� -, . / / / / / I 4 \ \ .'<�'. a`i YY��••^^,t � v; £ s • lax:{ ' `"g • . �M,ys . ,� ... 1 / / t / \ \ ! / / - \. \ »s,F°'QS +,wx 'x?'> t•"' tt4._t t,,: I '>t r`t �. �.`-. _1... ._/ // ' \ !/ / \ \ \%w..,J '^,t z '� ;irk L-ty>'s?Nry�� r .1. n f e{tF`f: - �. /� / / !1. // / \ \ 1 L17 Rc'2' i ...._Y 3%.::' ,moi gt ';?.A.. •4e ='aS k F 4' ix�.. f �� L -.-• - i :: i / / / /I I l \ \%\ \ \ t: i t : <- .2:y _.t'f'c.`� {{yy`�s��'£(' x i_• .�- . \ / / f 11/ (\ \ izc �I>; .36 ,,/ ..I M�- tail a..y^co-``-:�?€f�i - .. �' t 1 ! // / J t{ \ ♦ ♦ \`` ` •°":'`•-...• 1;y JJ :-_ __ � : gq . IT #* .1 -------------- --- -------- :__ �:�ti 9 d -) - - - - / / -- - - - / Ill •ti€'.^,<fir� -„ �� = - - - - - _ - _ - - .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T • Jt _- - - - _ __ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - Fs,�.s, r • r- 1 / / /i/ / .o / i - - G E' ass„ '^£':.:�, ss. I/1 t . / ' / ' / t 3 4 �i�"in5`r. i},*'• :°' ,''t ` : «os's:s"">L.>., \ \ \ J ! .1 1 / / / r - - o TZ� � z= y fit. \ \\ \ / 1/ \ / / / / 1nx�L 1 I f„a le;.##a;c moi: r t' L' v \ // \ \ / s 4hy s'-? lK / Cat.. ac,- x .#f'"; � "L E ..,<k..`sa , w<i£``, "e . / s _. . . I 1 / 4 �' - / .t/"g:x;. y x t . x i::,a .s:am.' :, - s {u'::..� ] y , 1 `'1 // / / / / r•` i; x�D=:. �: / / / / .�,: . »ys'x�t..;;•::1, -. a��:.:Y ,>r '��'�' .i; r *s. ;F,`�' .;,3e� ;x X€C "�"~~ . Y \ ` _ / !�� c,;, 1 1 / / i . a v a• ^L_iS K..fi € x< f x2e ` / \ - i / / ��z a x - . ' , ..._.•: ^k[Iw''Yt.. .. ,fi:.< '`:'i �':�,':p. ^ ,.` ,ate''- -� x iF •k{ys gv s y. 'fe' "- �i.&`e� i�.�..4£ ifs:.,H K �!..;> ,T 1 / J - :-e / . / s-....:.: ;., j i i n,?'` -_ tix. pFF �i ' /�t'.�M - , a �t� �f. a y ... JI / / / / / �i ' a�f< w ` R d,. tr!a. d .- f..,> ! \ s�.•w+'_--'% /� ' `-�'�:s.,.. �.,`: R-,,`--3 . . ` .'t-wsax'd,,,.., _;:{x: aofmp,'.-�_.`. `'_�•• - �'"i ti.� 1 zr.'-' -s . {"'s. z.: S dF 1 / - / / / / ,� c�9a.8,^r". i /_. f 1 {,�£'rF 'C 3I : s'"•t ... & psi t& .;4 L•�h. / / / / ' €{if.3'>S:"C`•ic3 G?[4x�"wi, ]`.zx `'u' iw .'?0't >x=`':u[�. .1'at<v'-'�'r`i1' r 3t`?s' C..•cS 1 ! / / / / / r. .-+, Via.. 3a:•a::'k �:o_ •,qtn=...�'.�ft� C•I.,. ..' ! - .tf 1 / /"[f4z-K /.i �/ x - s•]t�->a , . ,:ea 1 . ".i:- . es » s c>]`. ' ,': "` ]'t3,b" '�b'`•x` 'ff`,.'n"': E , t c'> l',',',•< gtr e., / J ! / / / > :]. Sr t e;•^�'� Kx v dw::(,, rf'{ .. P „' .`,< , >x' yr.' F' 1.w % K W:.. / / •/' s ;:, s:5{=#' ^ `�a''xy''^. ' 4-,.`::>•xtSW, ,A-` $ "r`°��'' a.� _ ":YS;:'c• " :aft- 'urt. "''i 1 /! / / / `r..." 3,`L't•', �;��";•.•'• >€''''{ / { 74 _ ::.xttc 5 .- s, ... u -,s-;.. '.3Sa .,;^'"'^"`•"a.,.: _„.,,. /.f .. itY4 ,{, / :; �".•� q. 'r zt zir5_^ S?@s Gx 6 «y;. x Wr¢ : ": i-sX '. _ �3�. •�KV i Z I 1 / J / / / ! �h.,c.>' ct {Lex .N i`` -s s mss sl e w ::2 „it :t, 1w ' ge ^ts dtL '1°';•.n. ' '% ` / / / / yd's 4 `/ ,�,T v / , `' - 'C, . / / 1 ._i % 7•`"' LL'"rf,.> ^'�f' :. r: -,:fit..,. ..,,`�t •"„ir: >,'�'S H�z` wsr,.tl,.' ';5.� :Y1f' s. vtid......«•zrs*`t^.#-K.I: ,Y .t.>'ay3+r;.. re^.1xm :.st " s,,,,.-7 ,<:_�`x � >'�,'`t`. „ac�a `'�..., ...,5'sfi As�zf'nr_>..,"=ec>.Q] t / ! / /� / /' 2.`4YF•it- �;1,-Uv+x:c kr �x E :<:w �" :4xi . <u,„ #' Kss:. .`ylxi p n"AAar Wts M 4 sP 7° t t / / / / / / 1 i v?r w st F_. >�"'i .. "" ' ,>:, .., 4. ",r � Sr +° �s S, 1'� IC`]w :?.. °'Y. Y ° ; x,]. x, .t ! ! / .< yy,,&, ,�`..<�`, ,alt: f,t' .?'i s'^sy., ,.,c• ... `Y •7�*-c, ,�Kx x„4z1+� � : !i5 <: / / / / ,.',& ,R : t 1 - . t.._._.11lr.-,L.", a S. T . ¢ . t �' gW : ": t. �e . s: x�» ss a 1 I ! / / Sj< c i i 1 �v::a «tiri»?a?fx.'mY>` ..a^.3. "^f ';fi r l�,✓ x . '�w.- L`','ccw��'• - 4^;:£tx?. 't.�.�:c^z».;?' . :va::e:'.T.,�'i•`-j- - c ^''^ / 5=_az_;4;<�� "r .. ,atee�z u ? tL if`,� ai` a .>_<a f: wf ! / / . / .t. Q_`'"v'y 'z 1 R a s� r, a. a4 3. k' e xe '�iR'� .. / d a, t ^fi�a-C.x,F,^,i2,-.'i„ uc:i`xt' r-'•, V [`:ri:;R: .# _ _ ".......,•°"`�S``:5. :.":.�`^'ori 4 a Vic..-:?�•is .... , irss , ' '�' .. �,-.,[f. ` s it. < •^••�. S«. ," , a w^.>> -vim • / / / / S" -s 1 I �.. s`.a ex^�t _alt, :a: ,F 'ti� Fuvt�x..w�,: i Fff`t�,•-'dSk.;yX. �'r....ov^-a, ."�3i •>:x - .,cw ". ' ':,r. c\1: sem: v `1aat.. Sit<- :.. �'S'{ �'r" ' ' /. ! / • .�'- >4^s, "R Gam['. y,. ti_. 'r�tt:h .d „r .n>xF u;`.rc ....;'� >'.,•• c..t <,c• 9::!-x, '>^4> ' Y -<e', .[ "v- �•s': •r`.'"�"' ! / >.:F i.a , 1 tx' "'fc'i• x:;,tZ<. .,>✓'' .�,XF:_Sri :` ..Y ..3 a', a.a'. iz'-;�?aC�i."^^': -, 1.`,`x . x;- $X.M .'Z i^'z; ,�, _yxS ? .._ 3, f J / v;'r''G -" ;,,.t9,.,C; ` ,ate'^ .::;%.;C : i-:<: a< .,«...':.. x'" x- Lxr�.., q :._ - � :r. , -1 , a 3 i.e •i5.>. i,,,..,:. .. ..-<>•i",•[,fie'4?"^f`w5..aa2'' - wy�c. :-;s4c•D.t.�t,�-i:: u.a '.�;' „e.,>sZs -, �grr -;,.."xn:•a»f,`•a,•t n YNs;: ,r; _:.::1'S' '`7�x:c2 "<c`t / 'I :sr..,.. '„_.ts,: :�.. .:i I ,�,...r:•, , .. <. ':<-. x, :?:s,as t `c.;,." -x...,• Via.• ``'� _ �e>i..'-.•.<I��>t :ex.a"::d :-:�c . Sti, -.„,`.,Fi' A &r- i % Y,>a a. .r?w. r-- a ` <, s r > a - xk ' rya z x,:F+< S o,x z r I k>�.<: ' - f -, -11 -- ,`3T-. ' ! / ♦ / ♦ ��a . s a r :--r :: _:. l:. :_ :=...Y't_>fe:«>`:;i> .:>c.; ,`"'.''w..;,. ,.xY^, . t�..: sa-ei[r'i:; x: \. tai-.,,,_..szX`,c.sr:: 1` :.32 ,t -e i'S. _/,b.:.r?.a+a:.. / I / i'.. » `.xwxF�:F { :: ak ;.. 3 ...< <a-�> •:::. ? z-r� .. to t. N v . s > > y:�=d t�::. - // / iw e k „ f <'S, .w< ??"•x1: ,c.<,t_:--• t. ,xK:s_�'i _ .,x? fi ,-.' C.'n a.... 4°S,..,... •.'fC«t ..x j. r.'^�• .y.. -'x c.. r8k 'r-; V. - s>,.� mt / / _ �a.,3,,,:`�^,...`:.....>;''„3,'.. Yz '.s :�- 1 „" ` �.tHscxP.;S•"x, 'a-£ aJSS`t r. '>+`,ar!a< > x«'"�Q,etK' e `.:f+�' •z a"e'.'. •,]���� tt-Cx:.Y R �< sr<, y' -'.,'v,' / / / ,� 4. , ..!>.. a .-.0-��.r '\`ly[.f r - tiq 'F.. ' 9 3` JA�J"rh :. �•>T '%,u•»:]x'-,E•'`-4, ']i:`, e. •<:2 M ix?M:.^. » 3, : Y' o :.fi'A. / L i. :. y. - ♦ y ,•:it3.. / + ct <'" "o'�� :»Y•ct'fF:,aK :a. • x •we%'s ff.:?:">-#>;,. <y:; Nx/: „y.:_• ! / 'x�`.:n^. :. �'t:+4z:. 1__ .r S�.r:r'� `'-.ro aY ..t,:v:..c'exoai cS....: �\ xs. ,:t^• .S[a x .S�':•t / I 't. # r `` t % ,`w„d: .. :.-.,4 ':•]>=c? j'. n i - iY >x q -x r< t-' a: to : ::a^.: '.z�':c ixX §1�.� t.`..xtr7>y,: •xx". aL.�"t,,ti � ..;r . '��x; a�''.-'.� / I 1>.., ,., t .S`3 rL i 1 xre.,,.....:F,'i:"�3[�.._ ... :< , ., .L.-::a.s r -Lx..- .. _. - xt6.T r'r•?F .... .:..X:..t »^"Y.r <n.x .�„v.' ;;fir':<.. 'St, a!>, ,c3,'.T ` x'<' 0. xn..?'' ••r^`:°< • Mx ' ': `":..di>E;` tn' .:h= T. '. � .:Fs ,a�tiSa yfe:ai.: ,� L4. , »<.-6 e - -v .::.: 1 ! :'.i i;�:u;� :, j r^ t -F i \\.v;_':<^.'�.c::."-c..:>•F.:.w.<.a.�'.��s^•a�;.ca. _, [tis.,.'.>>'.x-' �.. Q. :i? ,.i`r`.> `-s'-2]t:...§' >..^<5]:....,,,,>v«:«,r. 'ia,:�I wb- x,_�::;1. "i:. '3d` 11 .•- 1 \`:.• •, est i. , :.: .:. '� <�i^�,,]>:.^..:. 5>t. „'_y.`.i'•,'„4'tYo"aix'ii : x.. s X33-' .. t'" `.Y^.tK, _ #�., a xa.L`:'.v x t.'rA^..: ']eil 1 ! I '^,:i:✓, Y 1 I .11 0_ _. 1 , 27.:.... ^x.0^-'zai -t` a_s;,"'. MC -za , - �' '`i,'=�•]. „>,Y.'s.k...,'�Y4„�rx-1 .:fit'°?;fc,. �' ,c xYca+':_; u. •:":<s / / t '". ` _ ..,.r..:.., ... - ..T; .: sS.......:s:ce.. .. ..•�.... -� .. �a'a-.�`.--xwr.: �T:. .., txix:•e:, i�.r� y� "•-3 .x'Sisia..., .,. [x:E1 .. �-:enaus. .,,,.; '�k:s:__ �K{y4 / J / I �> -,.-v,,. ....x..w ,<... >;-:. tx<'"�':.Kr:xYe a.wf.,.,^,... »< 's`:.v-aitx=a., ., / i:lc^-Fer,•.h ,z.t'it, '-2 - . :,) :, X :: •Xar:i . V . .^�'r r `1 tri •L.. .3t4x., D' ".2L: K" �t I ia; \i <:Y ::::...i.` . M'T ': _ .,A^,: '^ . _ . h, r_ _ en$�i .... f. 2.. 4 W- ,: xH:.<.4 1. .x.. / lf-. r. 1)>f \.__ ^....,:<. <..:._x.:; :_ >y fx1..3, .. y: .%:Y . t,.. fcd:::c w.0 .l._.. _..._" .... .. iftS.:2• :r:-.K..t,.... x....:.^.:T^c...,,-_, < _...?> / _ .-x _ S ✓•!' ..,, ...'t:,i . ,..":. ..N...<.: ;% :...-- .... \ :.... _ . .C, . f 'i Y'::r-...,ytryi' Ki. t '1 >. ._ _ ,..Y. < / ! I l` w.. x... .. xs4.. _, 5-:rr::�ilgi2 •q y_s; :,t�^ wY. x ... 1 .., d -.i , ::_.. f.. _ f33_t'1d`a"'.:. .._....1 r. v„- v ,, �` F.1,x.. `' "-'": S,' - 1' ".-�::'A-,:iY<:'�::. K4it:f:i... / _<��'.: `,,. ..ri... >. .v\:`v •':.:.1 6 I �,St....-. `.. _. ..x:::.c,vr, xw- x' ... r$ r"; M_ a utw'.::: tc.: R:L:`;s `i frC / / I - ....x :: .. v,3.. ,�C.. .;�.. = :i a:., ..�._. ,K , .r:`.LtcFh':c °":i.:x.'. I / / \-------------- I -_ - -- - _ _ _ - _ _ -. I .y tr.:cy:.: <..,..." . "::..::.-t-c. : K.. .;zXL r ;,J,. ^r4.. : Y 4 e , _ " S s� -<. i S. ,E r i i 1 z / / #._ my.. .....-..... ._.,.. d ,* : -, w_ ,.. r'"d: 3;1.. 2' o Scr_ fir% :a p �;s`3 .ts[v:','R„z.. [w__ .` 1 _ \ - " - roi_ i •>afa .7. ..31::fi•�.. .•„a .s_a 3, .X\'i•ax_„.., c_c ...;•'�."''ri: _ z hr t gR. / / I / I - ~• 1 / _ �j 3 1 ii:.s f ' ie. , _ Y iow.^ r s.tr „"' S.,fi%-]`> ... s'. s£ ,,1 ...K a].,*. -3; „3< _ -'4x N �r t v. , .-` >'> e< r^- �•. �`v- zt;.., �. / J ! !11 J 1 t _ _ - - _ - _ _ .�..I.�.,. ."" 1 1 ., i �\ r`af . �' �rS 4c ErixL•o-. 4fk`lrt�[,.3 c �' -5., ,T.�,,;ty ,rrs rsS^"'`.. h r?i �' 1- > i'-1� / / ! /I / i 1 1 :..c 1 1 , ` �` n.,s.t `.��,� 4 �,,.•:.•r-F.if�4, s•.. -r r zr. .c .y]4 .:a `i'. 3.xq rah ." r•`. ,[r. ;S xyi I /! J/I ! - - :. 1 1 I I _ -- ra f y>^"iM .t.. : <h"�E r �. x ]\, ','r . r .3^' .ri't' doh a t ,ter I I ! l I .. i ' ,,...,< y •s" :' ',� i T,t,- k '_'�:... `a:'' -e•r.L a `k . __ Y/ J / / ! cs+c r 1 c••in\N�-t Y.� �. -a.. <In:�,v` - �..s ii ;/ / / ! I i , t _-1 1 1 f:a 3 x-'\♦�� .s s a -. a • :a=. :'i->,: . x �>, t �' x <. , ]:-i: J ! J ! I I ?: ? ' { v4 � ._r ;i; I 1 -•`-. i'^. 1 . K,s s �. { 1...... .._,,...<-r.^._.-�,.,_�..,.... . __.L:.__ti -.:.s_ ._? _;:. Via` .-.'._..�._....,,a. ..o! I._a .,,. _ Sv:...`t'f`:'c;i ! i i r 7 �. ••-.. :. ' i t '�` . ' :-L Kxac.WLrST- 00��4� �P�.�ooa Rt pesos" -T . . i A9 e n d a #--- -o Action by C_ uncil. SUMMARY MEMORANDUMQ O. City Manager -" FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate . Plannerd SUBJECT: .-Sibley Cove Rejected LOCATION:- County Road D,. between White Bear Avenue and Ariel Street APPLICANT: MWF Properties. (David Steele DATE: February 26,2003 INTRODUCTION Project Description Mr. David Steele, representing MWF Properties, is proposing to build a 100 -unit apartment . building. He is proposing this project on a 7.1 -acre site on the south side of County Road D between White Bear Avenue and Ariel- Street. The project would be a 3 -story apartment building built. in two phases -- 80, units in Phase One and 20 units in Phase Two. It also would.have- underground , parking for 1.00 vehicles,. 100 surface parking spaces and 18. future arkin spaces on. the site. The building, when finished, would have 86 two-bedroom units and 14 three-bedroom units. Requests To build the development, the applicant is requesting that the city approve .the following: 1. A change in the city's land use _plan.. This change would be from BC (business commercial) to R -3(H) (residential high density). 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned unit development (PUD) fora 100 -unit apartment development. The applicant is requesting the ,CUP because the existing BC (business.commercial) and' LBG(limi#ed business commercial) -zoning districts limit the uses on the site to commercial, office and retail uses and allows multiple -family residential uses only with a conditional use permit. 3. The project design plans. DISCUSSION City -staff found no major issues with the proposed land use plan change or with the PUD... The CDRB and city staff have concerns with the proposed design of the building, however: In response to these concerns, the applicant is revising the proposed building plans for the CDRB to review at their meeting an March 11, 2003. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve the resolution for the land use plan change from BC (business commercial) to R -3(H) (residential high density). This is for the 7.1 -acre site of the Sibley Cove housing development. B. Approve the resolution for a conditional use permit fora' planned unit development for the Sibley Cove apartment development on County Road D, west of Ariel Street. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Sibley Cove LOCATION: County Road D, between White Bear Avenue and'Anel Anel Street APPLICANT: MWF Properties (David Steele) DATE. - March 3, 2003 INTRODUCTION project Description Mr. David Steele, representing MWF Properties, is pro osin to build a '100 -unit apartment P. g p building. He is proposing -this project on a 7.1 -acre site on the south side of County y Road D between White Bear Avenue and Ariel Street. (See the location m-ap on page 18, the property line/zoning map on page -21 and the site plan on page 24. The project would be'a 3 -story apartment building built in two phases — 80 units in Phase One and 20 units in Phase Two. It also would have underground parking for 100 vehicles, 100 surface parking spaces and 18 future parking .spaces on the site. The building,when- finished would have 8 ' 6 two-bedroom units, 14three-bedroom units and a storm shelter in the garage area of the building. (See the proposed project plans. on pages 24-30 and the developer's .project statement starting on page 12.) Requests To build the development, the applicant is requesting that the cit approve the following: _ 1. A change in the city's land use plan. This change would be from BC(business commercial) to R -3(H) (residential high density). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages 19 and 20.) 2. A conditional use permit (CUP)'for a planned unit develo meat(PUD)for a 100 -unit P apartment development.. The applicant- is requesting the CUP.. because the existing. BC (business commercial) and LBC (limited business commercial} zoning districts limit the uses on the site* to commercial, office and retail uses and allows - multi lefamily residential P Y uses only with a conditional use permit.. (See the property line/zoning map on page 2'1.) 3. The project design plans. ` DISCUSSION Land- Use Plan Change To build the proposed apartment building, . Mr. Steele wants the cit to chan a the - Y g land use plan for the sit e. This change would be from BC (business commercial) to R -3(H } (residential hi h 9 density). (See the existing and proposed land use maps on pages. 19 and 20.) The city intends R -3(H) areas fora variety of housing including double dwellings, town houses or. a artments of u p P to 16.3 units per gross acre. For BC (business commercial) areas, the city pians for offices, clinics restaurants, day care centers and retail businesses. Land use plan changes do not require specific findings, for approval. Any change, however, should be consistent with the city's land use goals and' policies.. There are several goals in the Comprehensive Plan that apply to this request. Specifically, the land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal including: • Provide for orderly development. • Minimize. conflicts between land uses. - • Provide a wide variety of housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies. that relate to this project. They include; • Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact. on adjoining developments. • The city coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. •► Include a variety of, housing types for all residents . including apartments, town houses, manufactured homes,, single-family housing, public -assisted -housing, low- and moderate- : income housing, and rental and -.owner -occupied housing. • Protect neighborhoods from, encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The housing plan also. has policies about housing diversity and quality that the city should considerwith this development. They.are: • Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and .nontraditional households. • The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land useplan. This is a good site for apartment -style housing. It is on a major collector street (County Road D) and between two arterial streets (White Bear Avenue and .McKnight Road) and is near open space and, of course, shopping and other services. In- addition, this property would not be.'a great site for a commercial or retail business as it is hidden from the main commercial -area along White Bear Avenue. As proposed, the 100. units on the 7.1 -acre site means there. would be 14.1 units per gross acre. This project .density is less than the maximum density standard (16.3 units per acre) in the comprehensive plan for apartment buildings with more than 50 units. For comparison, the Birch V Glen apartment building across Ariel. Street is a 60 -unit, three-story building with underground parking on a 3.2 -acre site (an average of 18.75 units per acre). In addition, the Cardinal Pointe Co-op on Hazelwood is a 108 -unit, three-story building with underground. parking on a 6:75 -acre site (an average of 16 units per gross acre). F The city's long-term stability hof its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep. residents of all ages. To do so, the city, must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle to meet housing needs. Traffic One advantage with this proposal. is that, an area -that The city once thought would. be good for commercial development would become residential. Abenefit -with the proposed change will be its effect on traffic: Mr. Steele had'a traffic comparison done. between the proposed 100 -unit apartment building and a commercial development for the site. (See the traffic study on pages 31 and 32.) This study showed that the proposed apartment building would. generate about 300 fewer vehicle trips per day than a commercial development on the same. property. This reduced amount of traffic generation will help with the congestion at County Road D and White Bear Avenue. The city engineer has been working with the city council and city staff to prepare along -range (1-0 -15 year) plan to improve the traffic and congestion situation around Maplewood Mall. This plan includes the extension of County Road D west to Highway. 61 and rebuilding the I-694/White Bear Avenue interchange to accommodate moreArafficIf the city, county and state are successful in completing the various envisioned street and traffic projects, vehicles will be able to move around the Maplewood Mall area with more efficiency and with a smoother flow.. Conditional Use Permit, Planned Unit Development and Site Plan The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a plannedunit development (PUD) for the- 100 -unit apartment development. They are requesting the CUP because the BC ..(business commercial) and LBC (Limited business commercial) zoning districts limits the uses on the site to commercial, office and retail. uses and requires a CUP for multiple -dwellings. Section. 30-438 of the code lists the city's purpose, intent and requirements for PUDs in Maplewood. Specifically, the code says that, the intent of this section is to provide a means to allow flexibility by deviations from provisions of this chapter, including uses, setbacks, height and other regulations. Deviations may be granted for planned unit developments provided. that: (1) Certain regulations contained. in this chapter should not apply to thedevelo ro osed ment because of its unique nature. P p develop men The PUD would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter (3) The planned unit' development would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of this chapter. (4). The deviations would not constitute a significant Threat to the property values; safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of nearby land. (5)..The deviations are required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are not required solely for financial reasons. The proposed site plan does not have any code deviations or variances. In fact, the developer has done a good job in designing the site plan with the building and parking tot while wonting with and around the limitations of the site: The shape of the property and the existing power lines and pipelines limit the building placement and the location of the parking lot. It is important to have parking spaces and access to the front of the building. 3 I'n reviewing the above list of criteria, the proposed PUD would meet these criteria. Specifically, the . proposal would be consistent with the purposes of this chapter, it would produce a development of equal or superior quality and the proposal does not have any code deviations or variances. Compatibility could be a concern with this development proposal. That is, is a 100 -unit apartment building in this location compatible with the nearby land uses,: including the commercial uses? In this -case, the nearest residential land uses to the proposed site are the . properties to the east across Ariel Street. Specifically, the east end of the proposed apartment building would be about 145 feet from the west side (front) of the Birch Glen apartment building to the. east. The city_ should approve. the CUP. since the proposal meets the criteria for a conditional use permit. These criteria include meeting the standards in the comprehensive plan and the city codes, would .not change the character of the area, would not depreciate property values, would lower the amount of expected traffic o.n area streets and would generate minimal traffic on local streets. (See the criteria in the resolution starting on page 36.) Design. Approval Building Design and Exterior Materials The proposed building would be attractive and would have three stories -above grade and an, underground parking area. As proposed, the building would have horizontal cement board siding with a brick wainscot on the first floor, horizontal vinyl siding on the. second and third floors and on the gable ends, and the roof would have aspha-lt shingles. (See the. building elevation drawings on page 30 and the proposed project plans). The developer has proposed a mix of building colors - primarily earth -toned rusts and creams (red,- brown and tan). The planning commission and the developers of the Birch Glen Apartments (across Ariel Street from this site) have expressed concerns about the design of this building. They both want the city., to require the same level of detail and design in this new building, as was req mired of the Birch Glen development when it went through the review process. To this end, I believe the builder could do more with the building exterior and with the landscaping to make the proposal look better. The largest area possible ' for change could include adding more detail to the exterior of the building. Examples include changing. some of the. windows to patio doors and to bay orbow windows for more light and ventilation,' adding more brick (it is now proposed for only the lower part of the first floor) and adding gables and/or different materials (shakes, shingles) to the gable ends. The city also may vivant to require the builder to add- a banding strip between the second and third floors, adding windows and other details to the north end of the building (facing County Road D), staggering or breaking the long runs of the building (the west and south sides) to, change the plane of the facades and possibly adding other vertical elements. The CDRB will be reviewing revised design: plans for this project at their March 11, 2003, . It is meeting. staffs opinion that this building, with. the proposed materials, colors. and with the noted design changes, should be compatible with and equal in quality to the ,buildings -in the area, including the Birch Glen apartments. City Engineer's Review Chris Cavett and Erin Schacht of the city engineering department have reviewed thero osed p P grading, drainage, utility and landscape plans. I have included their memo with their cornmen#s on pages 33 and 34. 4 Public Utilities There are sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water in Ariel Street and County Load D to serve the proposed development. Specifically, the storm sewer in Ariel. Street was designed and installed to accommodate drainage from a large area north of Woodlynn Avenue. The developer's plans will connect their pipes to the existing storm and sanitary sewer pipes. Drainage The developer has designed the storm water drainage for this site to o into a new ponding area - 9 P g on 'the southeast corner, of the site. !n times of large storms, storm water may -overflow out of the pond into. the existing city storm water system. The city will not need a drain a a and utility Y easement over the ponding area, as this will be a private ponding area. This project will need a permit from the watershed district. Landscaping The proposed landscaping plan is a good start but it needs more work. It shows the. developer planting at least 50 new, large trees .including red oaks, maple, ash, linden,- black hills spruce and Austrian Pine. In addition, the -plans show the planting of a variety of ornamental trees and shrubs on the site. The proposed plans (pages 24 through 27) show most of the site being graded and the construction of a storm. water pond on the southeast corner of the site. This will remove much of the existing vegetation and many of the existing mature trees on the property. The landscape plan, , however, does not show any landscaping or ground treatment for the pond.i"ng area or any rainwater gardens. The city should require the developer to provide a revised p landscape Ian that would include the landscaping treatments for the ponding area and those for any rainwater gardens that .the developer may be including on the site. The proposed tree plan keeps many of. the existing mature cottonwood and, box elder trees on. the north and east sides of the site. However, the proposed grading plan does not save many of the trees in this area. The city should require the developer to preserve most of the existing vegetation along.the north and east sides of the site near the daycare center. -This-existing vegetation in. these areas will protect existing slopes and will help provide screening of the building. Site Lighting The applicant provided a site. lighting plan (page 29) that shows the expected light* spread from the proposed parking lot lights. The proposed poleswould be 20 -feet tall and would have a sharp Cutoff shoebox luminaire with a 250 -watt high-pressure sodium light bulb. The city code requires the, light fixtures have a design that hides the bulb and lens from view. Thislan however, does P t , not show any of the proposed. lighting on the building or any lighting in. -or near the proposed tot lot. In addition, the proposed pian shows little, if any, lighting where the two drivewaY s ,on the site would meet the public streets. 1 The applicant should revise the lighting plan in several ways. First, the lan should show how the p lighting on the building would add to the site lighting. Secondly, the . plan should have additional lighting near the driveways,' where they intersect theublic streets so the adequately p Y are uatel q y Itt. Finally, the plan should show details about the proposed light fixtures to ensure they are a desig n. that hides the bulb and Lens from view to avoid nuisances. 19 Sidewalks Staff is recommending that the developer install a six -foot -wide concrete sidewalk on the west side of Ariel Street between the existing sidewalk. north -of Woodlynn Avenue and .the. southro ert p.P Y line of the daycare center. This sidewalk wouldprovide the residents of this building off-street pedestrian access to the shopping area and church to the south. A. sidewalk along Ariel Street also would provide a pedestrian link to the existing sidewalk along Woodlynn Avenue and to the sidewalk. along Ariel Street. south of Woodlynn Avenue. The city installed a new trail. along the south side of Count Road D in 2002 as art of the'County Y p ty . Road D reconstruction. *.The city needs, however, a ' ten -foot -wide permanent easement along the south side of the right-of-way ton theproject site) to cover the area that the trail is on. Fencing/Screening .This site has commercial properties on three of its sides, including an auto. repair mall to the west and strip center to the south. It would be prudent for and helpful to the residents of'the new apartments if the developer installed screening along the west and south sides of the project to help ensure that the new residents, and their vehicles are ' separated from 'the adjacent commercial properties. This fence should be solid, be constructed of low -maintenance materials and be six- feet high. In addition, the fence should run along the south and west property limes, subject to staff approval. Other Comments Butch. Gervais, the Maplewood Fire Marshal, had the following comments: 1. Install a fire protection system in the building per NFPA 13 2. -Install a smoke detection system in the main corridors per NFPA 72 3. Install a monitored fire protection system 4. Include a fire department lock box 5. Maintain a minimum of 20 -foot -wide driveways for emergency vehicles. Lt. Kevin Rabbett of the Maplewood Police Department noted, that theft from vehicles is a chronic problem throughout the area. He suggested that the builder install a quality video surveillance system that would cover the underground garage and its entrance/exit doors. COMMISSION ACTIONS On February 19, 2003, the planning commission recommended approval of the proposed land use Pp P p e plan change and the conditional use permit for the planned unit development for this proposal. tan February 25, 2003,' the community design review hoard (CDRB) reviewed the proposed- desi n plans for the project. The CDRB had concerns about the proposed design. and materials of the building. After much review and discussion with the applicant, the CDRB tabled action on the design approval for the project. This delay was to* allow the applicant time to make changes to the pians to address the concerns of the CDRB, the neighbors and city staff. The CDRB will be considering revised plans for this project at their March 11, 2003,. meetin . 9 RECOMMENDATIONS A. Approve -the resolution on page 35. This resolution changes the land use plan from BC (business commercial) to R -3(H) (residential high density) for the 7.1 -acre site of the Sibley Cove .housing development. The city bases these :changes on the following findings: 1. - This site is proper for and consistent-. with the city's goals, objectives and policies for high-density residential. land use in the comprehensive. plan. This includes: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. l b. Being near a collector street, between two arterial - streets and would be near open space and shopping and services. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The on-site pond and large setback from Woodlynn Avenue will separate the apartment building from the properties to the south. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The existing street pattern keeps the apartment traffic separate :from the existing single dwellings and other residences. P. There should be less traffic from this development than from a commercial development on the same site. B. Approve the resolution starting on page 35. This resolution- approves a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for the Sibley Cove.apartment development on County Road D, west of Ariel Street. The city bases this approval on the findings required by code. (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction. shall follow the plans date-stamped January 24, 2001 The. city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. ..2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within oneY ear of council approval or the permit shall end. The council, may extend this deadline for one year. V. Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering P . lansThese plans shall include:'grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets, sidewalks, tree and driveway and parking* lot plans. In addition,_ the applicant shall include: a. Changes to the plans to minimize the loss or removal of natural vegetation including keeping and protecting as many of the large trees along the north and east property lines (near the daycare center) as possible. b. Revised plans for storm water pond locations and as designs suggested or required 9 gg by the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards and shall include best management practices and rainwater gardens wherever practical. 7 C. A storm water management plan for the proposal. d. All the changes and meet all the conditions noted by the city engineer in the memo dated February 10, 2003. 4. The design of the pond shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall provide the city a 20=foot-wide drainage and,. utility easement over the storm sewer pipe between the pond and the Arial Street right-of-way. 5. The developer .or contractor shall: a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements. b. Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove any debris, junk and garbage from the site. d. Install a 6 -foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Ariel Street between the south property line of the daycare- center and the sidewalk north of Woodlynn Avenue. e. Provide the city with verification that the. apartment building will meet the state's noise standards.. This shall be with a study, testing .or other documentation. If the noise on. this site is -a, factor, then the contractor will have to build the apartment building so that it can meet the noise standards. This may be done with thicker walls, heavier windows, requiring air conditioning. or other sound -deadening construction methods. The developer shall provide the city with this documentation before the city will issue a building permit for the apartment building. 6. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats or trailers. 7. Residents shall not,park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day-to-day transportation on site. If the city decides there are excess parking spaces available on site, then the _city may allow, the parking of these on site. 8. The developer shall provide an on-site storm shelter in the apartment .buildin9 . This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness.. It shall have -a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. .9. The city council. shall review this permit in one year. *The developer must complete these conditions before the city g issues a rading permit or a building permit. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 17 property. owners within 350 feet of the site about the proposal. We received two, replies: .Comments: 4.We have no objections to this project. (Rause -Hill City, MN) 2. Please hold this project to the same design standards that you held our project to. (Bob'- Bankers). (Also seethe letter from Mr. Bankers, the. developer of the Birch Glen Apartments on Ariel Street, on page 41.) REFERENCE Site Description The site is undeveloped. Surrounding Land Uses North: Perkins and Emerald Inn across County Road D. East: A daycare center and Birch Glen apartments across Ariel Street, South: Commercial businesses on the -north side of Woodlynn Avenue. West: Commercial businesses -on the east side of White Bear Avenue. Reasons for the Requests This proposal needs a land use plan change because: 1. State law does not allow a city to adopt any regulation that conflicts with its comp rehensive -plan. 2. One of the findings required by code for a CUP- is that the use is in conformity with the city s comprehensive plan. The land use plan shows this site for BC (business commercial) uses, which do not include multiple -family housing. The developer is applying for a CUP- because the zoning on this site is BC (business* commercial) and LBC (limited business commercial). The BC and LBC zones allow a variety of commercial and retail business and multiple dwellings with a. conditional use permit (CUP).The developer chose to apply for a CUP, rather than a zone change. A CUP for a PUD is only for a specific use and . site plan. A rezoning to R-3 (multiple dwelling residential). would allow a variety of multiple -dwelling uses and plans. 9. Planning Considerations Existing .Land Use Plan Designation: 'BG (business, commercial) Proposed Land Use Plan Designation: R -3(H), (residential high density) CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL .Land Use Pian Change There are.no specific criteria for a land use plan change: Any land use plan change should. be consistent with the goals and • policies in the city's comprehensive plan. Criteria for CUP Approval f Section 36442(a) states that the city council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for approval. Refer to the resolution starting on page 36. Criteria for pp Design Approval Section 25-70 of the city code requires that the -CDRB make the following findings s to approve plans: 1. That the design and location of the proposed: development and its relationship to neighboring, existing,or proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not imPair the desirability of investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably. interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring,. existing or proposed developments; and that it will not create .traffic' hazards or congestion. 2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with. the .character . p g . of'the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan. 3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable P environment for. its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good composition, materials, textures and Colors. HOUSING POLICIES The land use plan has. eleven general* land use goals. Of these three apply to -this proposal. They are: minimize land planned for streets, minimize conflicts between land uses. and provide many housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that relate to this project. They are: Transitions between distinctly differing. types of* land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining. developments. Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents g regardless of age,- ethnic g racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single-family housing, public -assisted housing . and low to moderate -income housing, and rental and o�nrner-occupied housing'. 10 Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or -intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The. housing plan also. has. policies about housing diversity and quality that the .city should consider with this development. They are: Promote a variety- of housing types, costs and ownership- options throughout the city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special ' needs and - nontraditional households. - The city will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. The city's long-term stability of its tax base. depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all ages. To do sof the city must insure that,a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. Appf.ication Date We received the complete application and. plans for this proposal on January 24, 2003. State Iaw requires that. the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City council action is required on . this proposal by March 24, 2003, unless the applicant agrees to a time extension. krlp: Sec 2N/Sibley Cove Apts.doc Attachments: 1. Applicant's Statement 2. Location Map 3. Existing Land Use Plan Map .4. Proposed- Land Use, Plan 5. Property Line/Zoning Map 6. Area Map 7. Site Survey 8. Site Plan 9. Proposed Utility Plan 10. Proposed Grading Plan 11. Tree Preservation Plan 12. Proposed Landscape Plan 13. Proposed Site Lighting Plan 14: Building Elevations 15, Applicant's Traffic Study from RLK Kuusisto Ltd. 16. f ebruary 10, 2003 memo from city engineering department :17. Resolution: Land Use Plan change 1.8. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 19: Letter dated February 28, 2003 from Bob Bankers 20. Later dated march 3,.2003 from Bob Bankers 21. Project Plans date-stamped January 24, 2003 (Separate Attachments) 11 Attachment I ivi ., :.._ ro en es 7645 Lyndale- Avenue .South . Minneapolis,.MN 55423� 612-243-4639 Fax: 612-243-5010' TO:* City Manger FROM: Dave Steele, VP of Development SUBJECT:.Sibley Cove Apartments LOCATION: County Road D and Adel Street APPLICANT: MWF Properties, lnc,. DATE: January 6,, 2003 INTRODUCTION' y Project Description MWF Properties. LLC, represented by David Steele, is proposing to build a 100 unit apartment - building. This apartment. building, named Sibley Cove, will occupy approximately 7.12 acres of vacant prairie located- at. the southeast quadrant of County Road D and Ariel Street in Maplewood, MN. The site will front on County Road D and is two blocks south of Interstate 694 and one block east -of white Bear Avenue. It is notable that this project is planned for 100 .apartment units in 2 phases; 80 units in phase I and 20 units. in phase Hof the development. There will be one parking., space per unit located within the underground parking structure and one surface parking space per unit. These ratios will also apply -to phase II of the project. (See the locationmap attached.) The project will be a one building three-story structure with underground parking. The design is somewhat of an 'V` shaped single building, which will provide privacy and security while rt�axim zing a two+ acre courtyard for the residents and their. children's (Tot Lot) play area. The unit mix will include two- and three-bedroom apartments to meet the demands , for work force. family housing. (See the proposed building floor plans attached.) The. project is bordered as follows: South: Small Shopping Center... Plaza 3 000 Shopping Center & Maple Square West: Small commercial uses i.e. Auto repair North: County Road D ... Perkins restaurant is on the north side of Co Rd D. Northwest: Children's World Day Care & Learning Center East: Ariel Street... on the east side of Ariel Street is Birch Glen Apts. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT 12 Requests is requesting stin the ci approve the following NfProperties, Inc. q g ty. PP would be from. BC (business. L. A change in the city's land use plan. Thischange. hi h densi ). 100 Units on 7.12 acres -= .14 commercial) toR-3 (H) (residential g density) units/acre. .. unit develo meet (PUD) for. a 100- 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) fora planned p meet. The CUP is requested because the current BC unit apartment develop q . rohibits multi le -family residential uses. (Business Commercial) zoning p P 3. Desi approval. DISCUSSION Land ,Use Plan Change . he ci to chane the land use plan To build- SibleyCove Apartments, MWF Properties requests t ty • g - •(busmess commercial to R -3(H) (residentialhigh density) for the site. This would be from BC ) d proposed land use maps attached). (See existing anp P • and policies. The Comprehensive use changes should be consistent with city land use goals Land g Plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these eleve n, three apply to this proposal. They are: ➢ Provide for orderly development. ➢ Minimize conflicts between land uses. Provide'a wide variety. of housing types. ject " 'th over -50% of the site serving ➢ Furthermore, the promaxim izes green space vv� essentially as recreation and garden areas. _ ➢ The -site provides for. equal distribution of traffic flow to both Ariel & Co Rd D. less than a' com arable office building on The traffic im act. of 100 apartment units vvlll. � be P . P • � � generation comparison (see :attached traffic study) the this site. According to the trip ge P . .. e foot office to a .100 -unit . apartment complex will proposed. revision from a X0,000 square reduce the daily ail site generated traffic by 328trips. 13 r- ➢ Provides for compatible use and -design with Birch Glen Apartments. The* land use plan also has several general development and residential development polic' g p elopment policies that relate to this project. The . include: ➢ Transitions between, distinctly differing .types of land uses should not create a negative ve economic, social \or physical impact on adjoining ments. p g p ➢ The city coordinates land use changes. with the character of each ' . g ch nelghborhood. . ➢ Include a variety of housinges for all residents. includin types g apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single-family housing, public -assisted housing, low- and. moderate- -income income housing, and rental and. owner -occupied housing. ➢ Protect. neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of in compatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The housing plan also haspolicies about housing diversity and quality that the city should consider with this .development. They are: ➢ Promote a variety of housin types, costs and ownershi o tions ' g yp p p throughout the city. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with -special needs and nontraditional households. ➢ The city will continue to provide' dispersed locations for ' p p diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land. usep lan. The Sibley Cove site is ideal for..apartment-style housing. The front street Count Road D and g Y the next, street to -the south, woodlyn,, are major collector streets, while white Bear Avenue and McKnight Road act as arterial streets. The site is. also within three miles of numerous schools,, day care centers, grocery stores, drug 'stores, banks, andublic services. For instance The. p , Maplewood Mall is within walking distance of . Sibley. Cove. Public transportation,, another important component, is also within a few hundred yards. of the development. Also, changing the land use would eliminate alanned commercial area that would have ave been next to residential areas (Birch Glen). This would adhere to Y -creating the Comprehensive Plan b a transitional land use between the existing single family residential (to the east and south).and. commercial land uses. As proposed, the 100 units on -the 7.12 -acre site means there would be 14 unitser o p gross acre,. This is consistent- with the iimaxnnum dens' standard.(16.3 units er acre in the Comprehensive �Y p ) Plan for apartment buildings with more than 50 units. 14 ilit o f Maplewo o d' s tax base Cove development would also addto the long-term stab ' of housing styles is available in the city, thus attracting and by helping insure that a diverse mix g y keeping residents of allages. ' - developer's use of "'Smart Growth" principles, such as a ➢ In addition, .the. de p _ le surface and secure parking arages, will create very convenient entrance and amp p g g act on the surrounding areas. A summary. of these contiguous properties hale imp g . . is on page 1 of this report. _ Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development and Site Plan i Tonal usepermit(CUP)fora lanned unit development MWF Pro. erties has applied for a cond t p P Properties. 100 -unit apartment development. Developer is requesting the SUP because the (PUD} for the p , p city code allows multi -family dwellings' on land that the city has zoned BC conditional use permit. . _ y g ' � 's 'purpose intent and requirements. for planned unit Section 26-43 8 of the city's code lists the city perp q developments In Maplewood. says code sa s the intent of this .section is to provide a means to . deviations from provisions of this chapter, including uses, setbacks, - - height ' and allow flexibility by � other regulations*. Deviations may be granted for planned unit developments provided that: • � chapter _ should not apply to the proposed 1) Certain regulations contained In this p pP Y . develo pment because of its unique nature. 2) The PUD would be consistent with the ' purpo ses of this chapter. old roduce a develo ment of equal or superior quality 3) The planned unit development wo p p d result from strict adherence to that which wool to the provisions of this chapter.. a significant threat to the proper values, safety, 4) The deviations would not constitutegnlfi p .health or eneral welfare of the owners or occupants. of nearby land. - g • le and practicable physical developments and are 5.) The deviations are required for reasonab p p Y . not required solely for -financial reasons. The city may approve the CUP since the proposa 1 meets the criteria for a conditional use permit. include conforming with the comprehensive plan and codes, would not change the These criteria lnc g p would not depreciate roe values and would generate minimal traffic on character of the area, p property local streets. 15 DESIGN APPROVAL Building Design and Exterior Materials Sibley Cove would have three stories above grade and an underground parking area. A surface parking lot consisting of 1.00 spots will also .be included in the development. The building exterior .P g g P would consist of brick, gables, horizontal ,vinyl siding and a roof incorporating asphalt shingles. (See the elevation drawings attached). Trash dungy sters and recycling. enclosures will also be ' constructed to match the materials and P y g . colors of the building. City code will be followed. Public Utilities There is a sanitary. sewer in Ariel Street and Woodlyn Avenue to serve the proposed development.. The developer's plans will connect their pipes to the existing sanitary. sewer pipes. Drainage Instead of storm water Ponds� P the developer has designed storm water drainage for this site to go . .into- specially designed rainwater gardens. Besides being visually. appealing,. these rainwater gardens help protect local bodies of water from pollution. The gardens will work as- filters.. The will collect and hold runoff water while it soaks into the g y _ ground. 'There,, microbes will use the runoff water, which often contains fertilizer, animal waste, and other harmful substances, as excess fertilizer. The. design. of the rainwater gardens shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. r Developer. will be responsible for getting any needed .off --site grading or drainage easements and for recording all necessary easements. N1W Properties believes these rainwater gardens to. be a more environmentally friendly P g . alternative compared to traditional storm sewers. Landscaping The 7.12 -acre develo meat is designed for um utilization of the developable land as "green P space", while incorporating areas that are within utility easements for resident garden plots. The site config oration lends itself to a "wrapping building or courtyard design to create a large area - of ofprivacy, conceal the effects of building mass, and. yet remain accessible to the community and utilize the City's. bike and walking path on the north side of the development. The site design includes 3+ acres 45% of green space, "rainwater gardens" for storm water detention, and a Tot 16 courtyard. The Tot Lot area will be designed into the project to create a Lot area In the center county sense of community and nei hborhood, and will incorporate child safety playground equipme4t. s y g Of the existing vegetation(large trees) along the northeast property Developer will. leave a.s much g g d around the wetland reserved as possible. In addition, -the developer does not plan to line an p . ' the boulevard and slope aloe the south side of County Road D north of the building. disturb . P g Site - Lights ' plan indicating the light s read and fixture design. The l��IWF properties will provide a lighting p gp e requires a - lan when near homes. The fixtures installed will be a design that. hides lighting cod q -plan . bulb and lens from- view to avoid nuisances, Sidewalks and Driveways : ' five -foot -wide concrete sidewalk around the south exterior of the The developer will install a five foot wide building thatwill continue around the entire west exterior of the building. In.addition to these exterior sidewalks*, and interior concrete sidewalk will be included in the courtyard area that nnects the a artment buildin to the Tot Lot Area, which shall be handicap accessible* co p g evelo er 'shall also install and taper each of the driveways according to city standards. D p p you for our time and.consideration with this project. Ladles and gentlemen, thank y y Sincerely, _ David T. Steele Vice President - Real Estate Development h�I'V P'rd:Perties 17 . Attachment 2 LOCATION MAP J 4 N interchange Seim A.v MEN T Attachment 3 LAND USE MAP SITE (.EXISTING) 1Q 'c. U 2 m7 6.94. f . ......... North St Paul �, interchange Beim A.v mam Attachment.4 cz a� cc 0 cc E White -Sear . Lake R-1 North St Paul Attachment 5 . fu -694 , rl 040 70 two .. f WENDY S, /Q I AMOCO . _ . _ <v •4,vA- =tr,�.�1 yeal_-_- S5'Jjl . �Or tt - /�j� `V "• J O y^r� , •'�.•ws .JLC. C.► `"' _ _. ► €um Mw .� ., 303, 4 ., �.]FIE MirCOUNTY ROAD D �..i�.. -- m t y��oo NF�. "�ARBY S �' 0 3100 � 1.93 ac. ° ° 26 (� DAYCARE 09o.f o .� Az a 029(19) °—' t a o J CENTS o ° R �/ 20 0.1 .3.47 °.� • (� v Z b'• --- p 5 89'S9'4fo• E 1822 ' 6 8 Q 27 3 �► �' m X60. �Q. - N. SITE . • r -Zs3 C� _ j 3094 4 O. S; Z6 �� r` i ( a 3088 13 Z26} m -- - z' -4�3 s" SITE 3070 5 d- .o �i �a=L;r� oo � 1.: 4 I sG Aut -w I p ui—wY I's - ' In at r 1 3p '�v----- - 5p 1985 , F 1 p o v4 • rr ll , �` l 1 �8ac fS� O60 o o •L p - I. Sat. ; Z1 2029 N 4 b•1 '.$�•E �i8� fi .%•� $3 .9Co x G . � �•c � ' - = �C7� _ 6.24' q.. �R;1�o ��r fat- /t 3.D t arc . Ui .�•21• Rc . 7� ,•� , . 114.10 o• _ f (� �•• ,, �_ WOODLYNN AVENUE _ Ile _ PLAZA 3000 -�j 00 ao - •c N. -1100( Z ..•�-O ac Q PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 21 4 N Attachment 6. Attachment 7 _PROPERTY DES CRmTION PARCEL A: Ths Easterly 239.00 lest of the westerly 329.31 feet of the Southerly 42Q.33 feet of the Northerly 681.33 levet of the Exept the South One hundred (S IW) fest thereof; and Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 29 North, Rongo 22 West, Rornsey, ,County, 111nnesota. PARCEL fit Except that port thereof lying West of the Easterly Ilse of White Boar Avelue. and That port of the Northwest Quarter of the. Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Ran Except that port thereof descr bed ae follows. described as torula. 1?s 22. ►r+o►e complletsly CanrnsneMp al o point 33 feet South o/ the North 1/4 cane of sold Slectlon 2; thence running South on North pfd finning at the -Southeast canner of County Rood 'D' and Whtte Boor Avenue; thence running Eat Bong the Sout life of sold County Road 'D', Seventy -live (75) feet, thanes running South and parallel: with the Most ilne of sold point:Swth 1/4 line of sold Seclfon 2, o distance of 613.15 fleet to o poilt thine_ East o dig of 90.31 lest too Section Two (21 One hundred twenty-five (125) feet thence fist and parallel with the Southerly line of sold Count then thence Nutt a distance of lett to feet to o point on the South N9flt-of=ray'ifle of County Rood '0'; and Road ''D' to o point all the Easterly line of W111ts Blear Awh w. thencle .Northerly along the Easterly rile of sold nth thence West, a flbtoncs of ti0.J1 .fest to the point o/ t»pinnMQ, Bear Avenue to "tine point of beglnnkM; and . IPARCEL C. � , . • • " the North. Ten (N 10) ocros of the East Twenty (E 20) acres of the North Half (N t/2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW t/4} ' Of Section Two (2), Township Tweerftynlne (29) North, Range Twenty-two (22) Nest, according to thle Unitled States I Government Surrey ttis►eof, subject to 1Mite. Bear Avenue and County Rood 'D', excepting the. foNowing portions thereot. to �.s -�Z Narth lit, of The IYw t/4 of Sea.li+�` 'tea-^s_..--�tM MC 1/4 of Sac. 2 (Gnla7iha N f eunly Aoad DJ r� � •• i::�'� l a�i't•�r a° we _ �"~ � •h' - "''�-'�• ---r �- •�• •� (Cwnrr•1x of to Ip- haa.� =."719% h a ' 1 ■ 1 /{ twV.al .leillr i .. �. - - - - - �,�/ _ _ _ _ +--. - 11 °• 4i 11 -(�-- _ ►+etraror x».ol muL_ _ 1 /-SE Crwr, N County Reod 'D' aM u 1"who ltaha. _—� ` g_ -- - - -►-----1-Nd94�7'A3'E_"'- .$'. tt9.43'107'E�--�------f-►- ' K :...''.�. IF , 75.00 - ty _ by a. aan I -It 17500 -�, So oMrCEat Nood• M/u/' t / ��� .i' ,�uic 9 - j I • I' GAP t.. vr.,� � Se!-` -+1�- � �"" „•� ',�ryb�'" , '.�-,�"'L• w"i" � .-� .` ^ `' . l �- 3A .. +eve' --954 ` -, /N / l 1 AP 3 $ 1 f •� .• � I I I = ®AYCARE I 1 . ' i :� r 1 p► 1 I - 1 OL� o� 1 h I S ,— 7iflD �� �O�t 1 1 ' 1 1 t Z I 11 4 w t • I ��C x 3. 1 - \ tns , _ •wI I �N I a• t R ver i `` $ W I `o , 1 N ! `•� ` 4l� A O (•° , 1f� 5 I I I �P� a or7 I � ,. l ° CENTER l CAP y :. �• t � � 'sca 1 t, , ' i �� „ 1 - !shit w..r.l .. we,.+r w _ / S89'43'07'w j o ., ,... _ �� N \� 239.02 - Q? If fretain ' N AGAP _-for,.IW=:err^°.,-tR ,:ithao. j O , EEs , ✓ 'I \ I 1 I I 4 SouM irw °f the •n°rth ]fib 50 � + C ` '^ ` \` ` .•i ! ' r - W -e Sam Jett or ore Mw 1/4 of See 1 ii % '\ / \ j I ^ -- J r W.A ca It !r awi.o�aJ>�J �ES )w e. w '�� I/' 1 J.. !1 % ran us.� ' 8£Ntr1lAl/SRK 3t3.so _ , I I. ,� ''-'°oL' ; t i '• ale"""s" `*'• j t 11 �I t 7A1H = 957.33 I%I ! _ 1i fi �••hi j war , L t .t a a. I ' \'h + -: j i I J PARCEL Tftli_ �.a6nr.�!I R-r�-►.jnea , ,m�:� i J ! I .� 'C3 l' f �• �y 1II ''r , . `•c, j �9f��,�h-•�•h�\%tt%' r..4.01 tA• /' 1 1 n.`wrah w! ' Win 6 ii�li' I �� -air � � •�0 1 � h � elfin �I � �' � . Neal 117 o/ the tett 239.013' feat N a W I flhysrit 329 sr het eve tM Mw t/4 of ! I ]` n< ,� - T .r s+rr •w�hw:�r �, i 1' ft ,`/ . � NE t/4 0/ Steffen 2/ I" EL t� . , %---; ;ttl l ,�� • "" ��' --' PARCEL ;''A'°; tate FroY.l .Ith r+a 69130 f.et eaufh d a�'� r .J� , I 7_ the, re►Ih liha sr fht Mw T/4 of Ste. 2 t K' ahrhr.� �"w •� �1 i 'r ha •� t� _" --- j 1 NSB•<T13'E I- ,� +i•r , 4 \ \ .. i : .' ,1 , 1,. ;' e 1 I j hr tam.114.1-3 :i+_ ' err anw.or North .ha of :OO OD Mwf Northern 1 ` \ ! % 1 t \ tD in 1- rhti - err _r" Slol.a Pow" 3 Des ny EOwenhanl then , 1 a 1 J t _ _ _ - ` I ' `• 1 - N N_ boar ti63 0a•da, pwa 3t �_+•� I ' - �' - - - I- - = L _ 1- � i�j _ I W ».,ate..— .•�__� _ ._ — .=.._. I14.1 _-i ` 1a 1 h y qu•ox..r:saa'� -�, a." . a:� ::r •+�e�t-- -••.r--eveMy --st�Ler--+' = r-+.r�{.`.r?S7r- - 1 1 si I -'-----._�� a _ %� t �� 1 so 4s -= Q1!4`' 1' env ; : �.. /. ` .Hawn Of 5a.00 1001 Standard 0� n •� ` ( 1 I J v�• i � ��_}"ivy OstvnOnt Per UOc. N4 1417341. y _W � r.� !' �•. -+ i ^;' lrs-r- �. a _ s .-- a • i e- a . -�_ •--_�`.r a -� °�f' t -in r - _ • I - - I I I ' -.. �. -� _. --Vi -G 3 {.., T� - �Zi-1 ._ `C�rt•iny-err 16505 bot Yartaerri .totes p&~ - I / , , ` - _,Company Eat be. N0. ,571915 / r rw cotta arr.c .thy.• � � • �, � i I I i � � ` � .-� r�-��"�"� � 't •f�.: ' . til I � a. Daahf•J09.0 j/ �-+r se as e�:a_ �' --r j ap err -S rtl=.11�.e..-•r--vr!►�.r-ar�.e=M.-�s.- r! Irl=.att�ar�rL:�rl `tlL.�t 1 _ _ I - ti.�— 315.b2 '-- -�-- �- `_- -x j Were of the tou'Jh :00' of the tiarlh 10 eoaa arh,� p a N�tj7ci •E �„` c,.,.,, c„a ,� �Q.0.3T 1 -'C'M Mie of 77500 foot Northam Stetn Power I -� t'ta �` NO �N89'43Y}T_i Carnpany Emement par Doc. No. 1695812. p , I 3 .00 - `-',.:s..T.;: ��� •, u f� o: ry2t a.- 239.02 ► e 1 .,_,:�:.�: .. �....r I i ' E X C E P T I ON :.L ' �`� ...... ' x;1' ;0 �` a� S89'43'07 -W _ f Nqp'�' South lrna N ka nark 681.33 'het f. • -- .�---- �. _w 1/4 of the- 1/4 of Sae. 2- - --T ----- �--L- t EXtSTING_BU ING _ _ - - _-. - - - _ _ E11MING BUILDING I 1 • h ' C& Jul L�SouN Nno of the Nvk to wee. of the Mw 1/4 of See. 7 • i 1 Bearings shown ere on an assumed datum j GRAPHIC SCALE j • r a r r hn .. ter (W rsteT NEsq � , 1 took • 60 IL i ttNf`�t19 _ r� Yi-M�••`a'' YI 1YR I 1•Yew at+. • ...w. 1K c.hiu r0cer�� r ewllfy k•t u%4 p n as Prepared by nor e, wGr my Siffsr „a R•Mairu ' ••..•.... ...... -y. L %wr.WN c•hd live. I am a dwy lend Swwpw index :rive b.% 0•�+• a 14SHFFT TI TI F OWNER rwl »rs.haaa r.s hu. +o Stets N tNaaeaels. Reg.Dal.1/14/03 'AB Drown JAB EXISTING CONDI1IONS :70?4FXiSi.dwa . 4 N Attachment 8 -- -- ---- -- __ COUNTY ROAD ,.p,. IT:► • • t KS,r 33.0 ri14.5 �7 - - -- m00 zz Lu X� �_ DAYCARE CENTER ; ; J 30x30 { — - — W TOT LOT Nr---------147----!•------- FUTW AWRON ! 4 226.0 Ar " t PARC • • • y,.' I 1 i " It • IPA( tI "' �T* L$ I ! III` PA MONd sf�► & [ 1 raw 0 1 s � � • • • • t s r • � " • r I 1. � i 1� I ! 1 I z� P. S I I fdl�.IP�ka X t i • , • ExiSi1NG 131T, " �- • � • � *96" FA RADIUS • Q I �.. ` f13i' FALL • . + RADIUS F fcmrK x 1 S70R11N►ATER PCNDfNG i na r si .. sr r _ t • 1 vr _• _ _ _ _ EX16�1NG BUlLOING • EkiSMNG BUILDING 1 T--- -- --•- --- -- -- -- -- -- t SITE DATA •- ` ` BOUNDARY AREA--,- -- — •---..(310,120 Sq.Ft. PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING AREA• -±32,230 Sq.Ft. TYPICAL. TYPICAL PROPOSED TOT LOT _ ±900 Sq.Ft, PROPOSED BITUMINOUS. PARKING LOT --±53,432 Sq. Ft. P�IRKING STALLS" 'HANDICAP STALLS PROPOSED SIDEWALK ±7,207 Sq.Ft. TOTAL IArlPERWOUS SURFACE—.±93,769. Sq.Ft. �r � t TOTAL OPEN SPACE (216,351 Sq.Ft. . Jc", _.W � f _�, NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS ---------100 Stalls (INCLUDES 2 HANDICAPED STALLS) H'LLdcnment y * RMI EL- 959.94 -'•' -- .. - - - - '- -- - -. INV El- 4--192 /// j !iN U. - 9:12 22 / ' p+.��i ate.' /�..� MV Et- 933.46 N 1/4 Corns- Section 1 P }•0 I�VV IV t /`1V-� C �4017 - NB9_43.07"E---- .-•--J �' --- _ 2637.01 Ply EE ---. L_. 3 / n. 194.21 �©, - ► • u. lsasi Ow. EL- 23e.2o 1 i S--f---f -a---f--r__ _--f----�lYll_.9���+.� ' --1 - �•f- -►--- ----__I---__�----_�- j' ' . '' e�t� ham; -��---f'•'-- :.. :1'JV,•. }Z ;.. _ 7 r RW EL- 2Se.t1 ; E if 3 Wo u u 1� uB-uO u ` :��:� dv O- 939.33 -P vo I r rvc Flue rrc qua - n i . esj sm. 3ERv �� � sew. St11v. s- Dw FLU - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -� � �--• . If Si I NATER 1w. . !s I I 1 3•�. I I � v I s , 66 , I 6, DIP y 0 ( 0 I I I ( ) )fit > 4011 Ill imp V) �O�n nr I 1 ha -- --- <• 0 o x%8-1 ( 06Ava I mrn -- -- to ° `�w DAYCARE CENTER7al r o� ' I _ I I i r �' 'm --- -- �. � +' •; D +poi i lvy� • ( --- --- �- 14T - CPE O TH-7 N u l 1 0.40x rT, A L Ld R, --- 1 ris •` ( 198• - 6- PVC (SCH 40) 01. i ( . at roves y<y In C) > >� -O� 10 /rl }'n,{ ' • C•• •A f�1 jt Ei • 1 v • °".Z Ian O 1,0 a ... • tJ1 1 O LA 1 0 m I R � fox ILA m ti PARCEL A s eafalE sloErfAtx I I I m m --•'� 1 I• 1 I I 1IP TI f;/>JT� I 1 1A $ s 1 TO 1 CON OUr OUTIER 1 � 1 1 I I I C 1 i I I j I I I I .m I . I I I I I I t t �r p� , rs ► ; I 1- dI Dib 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I Z , F= I 11 i-1---_11 ► I � 1wo fr 0 - • t- T1i-• 3►�r 24 I� I 1 I 1 11 t I I.yQ11 `') n = N 2.44 1 � 1 r i'��r— 2t2a4 t r 9222 {. 1 I� I F I I I. ZI- I I �• -4 I Z o„1 _ ,d _ a �1 I 1 I I I I I �f�-T moi- t ' I �jd . ! I 1 1 I I ole �l I I n�i cb-1 M I i BIT. tpw --- ------ ----------- --- -- -------- , Q�-, ems"' -, lAa to ri R.0 r N N M d mm j E N \ �a > zZ t •� •�1a 96 FAL i'�°..fc= c�a �$�; a� c>r rn°�1� �) ;..I a..x Aows ��N tri -� r D ao ------ v 1 - • N O -• �-C > Sr , I z C �� . -,rte A- � � y.� -- •a , � m - ..-. �"o � ! 3 IA �pl� f p1p rr,. ,O P • 1 «'Tt ELEWRIM I Z taD 2 Z N I .00MLt� I •- I. op ' ' E Q E I NO. I I ; to fo ,o y 3.0 TONER Srt w - od oil -oil = --°d - °d - - -. `9 �- oat - U� _ SET tP \{ N q P ------ 9a2 -_-.-- --_ - NYC - �y� N --- -- - -- �- -_ ugr*I Rffy EI - +.ae1 � � » < + 946 t v I SET f MTV tTy1 P 1 RW El.- 9.193 i I t I "-------- ----- --- -----�- --- -- 1 - g JG&N'EXISTING BUILDING 1 P L " a I O I� �Ic m. ® 1a 1. & # _ 6�.2<- _ f A P a Q a Rim EL- 9.413 ( �' 890 R 4 N Attachment IU 13 Z* lop 1 ,}--.At__..__tf-�• •, INV 133 I>! tr OW EL- .4! 1 T__j _- --- ,,�`q'1_''\J' [L• 9 95].4! it_' NM1/f Can•r�telldn I I EL- MM EL- 258.90 114 p" E/. ;15 Vim• _ <•• ; • wk:r 5�..t0-4 7 r` --I - 2 0 A ` SAM. SERV YIr ( VC PLUG Yf♦ - - • 1 � • •. i • • • • i •Z'f' 9 fit • �- 1 1 V 9 in I- i �!!i� �' 8-' �_.-, • MA7LA SERV.. -ice' SCRv. .... �� $ Art+'RT'1G 1•. �� - 3`� 1 . d i t _ �- x,956.. iER suv.-z v ij 0o c 1 "M CL ce_ - elD rn 8 Z = n • I TREES I ; I i L t v fn C IL, -- - - = 13 # �lr,T p ,N TREES -- �. < K 1 : DAYCARE CENTER a zboy I 95 JAL m IREEStp i .. I _' .•_ ! • g5Z \ I . I \ =6 i { 41 ^ �^j �4. / � ' � ! • ' �._I • .-iib" ._ - , --, (• � 1 1 ` i i 1 � { �c� I ( , , , --t 121 TREES p96'�TMa-• � I � 1 1 �• -9 . b- a ' /. � 'L �I �• ' � I � : � I 1 I I �' j / / " I 8 X' % 96- to ` \ • J I 11,11 r R = 1 .u� b i Vin"- -`�` t. � �✓ t :� I � •'.I.>=•. I C - n t '., •r.. : + .•Q" ' ' I � r �' � Jail•' ; I I III ( f � " /- R � � � � � ~ •L: } 1 �• � � , . /' i • � 1 i a_ •:} , i 1 I! i I I I i ti I - 1- jf --- ----- •'` J i is -- I Ile'.� i.' TI+rl.95e / • I ; ; `T� �► t l ��� ;��,;�::ARSE 954 � ,• , << , • . I _�_►�' 1 r'\ I p) �i COS -521 t I• 1 ='s• `- C3` I ',1 1� I 1 I I I :11 I \ �y u I I I 1 �c ,I I � i,� I � - > ' 0 h - ` w �' N _l -_f \ M • 010 I1 i !- ,. T - �. t..r -- •sem -� _ _ - -- " -, _ _ - _ _ _ _ L - I 958 .-r.- )1S ' �a r\ It t i r 96n »I t I f 1 1` I ��I t I 1 n 1 ' I' I 1 El PA INti Y tl y • J' t { BIT. owl -------------��--I-I------------ - - stili_ _ _ I h I J I . ` I � n n �-._.os,{ _ � �. -..•. - � . � � � � ; - I gCi6 � 1 fir: i V 95 \ �` 54 ' 1 • m `�_ { --__- - I-1- O 1 I `952 �1-�----------- ---- . - SO --�� • _ �IT� i r i• ` 1 -�_ }- -=�+,- - -.- _ - - _ _ J 948 9 I}�So 1 i • • 1 I I p. 1 Imo\ - .'-, �. �- •� v > _ C' �y PMP Ai ELECTRICAL II IC' 1 1\ - - _ -- - - b i 6 , 940 I I • 6 1 ' •�- ��. .J `_,.. \ I • /YO I WE' ;�� - --- ---- - - - - - .� ?TO 7r� ; 942 -T `- -'- L M \R!1 ,.... s 0 � 8--- 1. 946 - - - - - - I Valli \ /. / I /\ _- ® '., ' - 9i+•-� i � 950 al a . I C.B. 1 _ 1 I c'-----------------------.--- Tolov ------------------ 1' I-•?�•----------- EXISTING BUILDING. owo • ' ,�, r iA RIM EL- 94!:11 1 1 U3 4 nri+ e 1 R Q ei Z s PROPOSED GRADING. PLAN 26 4 N Attacnment ij V. m i } � PRESERVATION TR ! COUNT ROAD D I � � EE TOTALS __ I- - --►-- -- i -----I ���•----I---•�---r �----1-----1--- -i-� SIGNIFICANT TREE TOTAL- . u - y i C _ SAVE •ss� ---' J� '-'.r.-.Zys�''' Aus9 s � �-' � ^ �- REMOVE 1 66.3 • `1 Q 9 3 .7%; . J � / ! TOTAL 4 (100.07) � I �'' \�>� ASH, COTTONWOOD, AND BOX ELDER I NON-SIGNIFICANT TREE TOTAL SAPUMM Q [ , U GS LESS THAN 8" IN TRUNK DIAMETERI z TREE of 11 l I SAVE 9 18.4 _ _ ` x REMOVE 40 81.6% TOTAL 49 (100.0')zz . c� F O TREES LISTED AS HAZARD. OFF SITE OR . 1 X = f NON—SIGNIFICANTN THCNT TRELL E TOTAOT LS. X / TREES ARE OTT W THE Fl 1 I ` \ w cm I 1 - _ 0TREE REPLACEMENT 1 1 PRO'TEG.l10N FENCE . 16 IOMNER REQUIRED TO REPLANT - - \ DAYCARE CENTER x (2) 2.5' DECIDUOUS TREES OR r (1) W EVERGREEN TREE _ FOR'EACH SIGNIFICANT TREE RE110VED 30x301 �'•4 (3) SIGNIFICANT TREES REMOVED TOT(8) 2r DECIDUOUS TREES. LOT �l �'� I TO BE REPLANTED ON SITE EES NOT SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILS I 9 _ C S / - —- 5 , 1. I • In IN �7711's .5 0 ml I o0 ! J El PROTEC ON FENCE TR2 5 % 62- `'' x"94 I 40`" 23 2 > > ; , m 11 ,4-- � � •� '. /1 1t r tj � .. V 4 IIN TME R-O TEC11ON FENCE I . I i / \ _ o Y , DKL—S 1 ` ��_/—J a s W , •-a' s1m roKc rosy u + •I 1-10 �� I • •2 _ ��11 .� � 954 • . � � (� .r .I igo d3 , v ' F TUE i 6l A4s I` P K NG • I � 95a! /.11 I I I I t• I'• 1 c�..- — }= � � I� I sL I . - • I I A 1 I I `I I { I 11 1' l TREE Ll ST I --------- _._9 ', Q yS i i r i �• i FfYMOE PAW I TA" SIZE INK TIME NON-510NO CANT PROPQ= STATUS 114P COTTOWM D NEI-9F10NAMM- SAVE - - - - ., .-�•••• - \ ( 1 ` / I Z 14 COTIOWAM - NON-5104FVMT SAVE 3 le' 00TTONwow NON ; scNFI w SAVE _�•S4• �••- ••� /'� 4' • tr. COTTONWOOD Naw-Smancoff MOVE SSAVE 14vIlv CQTTONw= WOOD NW 7 14' Cd1TOMW000 NON-SNiv1GWT REMOVE -� ir--=--If ='• 1i'--••q'=-�9 -- 0 0 -- 9 - 0 a 0 a 1r COTTONWOOD WON-SIONFICANT REMOVE 952 t 10'• OOTIOFIMIOOD NON -S fila T SAVE �- ---_ _ -, - _' _-_ L so • 10 10' COTIONWODO. NON -SPP*, NT SAVE g _ .12 16' COTTONWOOD 12 14' COTI0NM m NoN-SlQNlFr_MT REMOVE"-SONPIQANT REMOVE I GBAAlOC 'CHEZ a F= 14 a' COTM MCOO (4) NOIR-9fiAFICAIIT REMOVE 15 a' COTICNWOOD NON-SIGMFiCANT. REMOVE 1s 2• COTTONWOOD. � REMOVE ELM SAVrow.• a SFMEET TITLE 202371TROI.DWG u a' COTTOMMW00D MMON-9aNF1cAWT REIMOVE TREE PRESERVA11ON PLAN Owr+ER 7645MWF �DAROP�ER75OUTM PROI�cT r p v VE 1t r COTTONWOOD NON• -S mcmT REMOVE o,v., u�/Kd� MAPLEWOODf , MINNESOTAstar 2M 1O' BOX EIDER �-SQVM�r �� NINNEAPOUS, MN 55423�1 1 j 21 ' -lr COTTONWOOD NON-99"mcw REMOVE 22 14• COTTONWOOD NON-S0NIF1CJINT REMOVE 23 10' Co1TDNW000 NON-Slame NT REMOVE 24. It' Smanow REMOVE 25 10' EM SIONWW.4NT REMOVE j 29 10' COTT0WW000 NON•-SKWCANT REMOVE 27 r COTTONWOOD NO4_5mwr1CANT REMOVE 26 to CUMENE ASP= 3H*mcmr REMOVE 29 10• 00 CUM NON -S N=NfT REMOVE ' 30 10' 'cm7amwm NON-SIGNFWANT REMOVE 31 t0' COTTONWOOD NON-SfiIIFTOANT REMOVE 32 11' BOX ETDEI W -TREMOVE VE . 33 1/' eox ELOET RONN SKCANT 34 W BOX -ELM NON--ucm rANT REMOVE 35 Irl .BOX EIDER (4) NON-SKWCANT REMOVE 36 C. • AUSTRIAN PNE SiGNFICANT REMOVE 37 12, BOX ELDER (3) NON-SCHMANT REMOVE . 30 l Bo aF Dai �� MOW LEGEND. 40 IS* Box ELDER. NDN-S16N r_ANT RMOVE 4M 1r am ELM . - NON-SwrsFTCANT REMOVE M . NL*m w wm I%#= 42 14' BOX aM NON -Boor -WT AVE KE OM - 111 11a oaMma mm ON 43 1r BOX HOER N0N-soNF1_w REMOVE NTaIN+1� WAY 44 14P. COTTONWOOD NON-SIGNIFICANT SAVE I=-34 - TRE O NOT W 3*wr- NT YM SOS OR TPE 45 la' lir WTIONWOOOCaTmNVAM NON-SONFICANT SAVE SAW - wu TO E 14vm q 15' BOX ELM NON-SIGNi1DANT RERELO\E mmm• VICE 10 E RllaMm 4a Ir COTTONWOOD NON-sMGNF1cANr RE+OVE 49 Ir. OOTIONwow NON-SQMFICANTSKNFICANT' REMOVE MOVE ;; �V m ELM o NWa sar1 :avE 533 2e' COTTONWOOD XTE%N&.000A04 Y N -MONVICAW REMOVE 5NON-610Nnew REMOVE 54 IV BOX am NON-alomF10ANT REMOVE 55 70' O 7ONWOCp NON-aNafF10ANT REMOVE x 13• Sox =0 uwwu OODAr NON-s+QWMANT REMOVE 37 13• am cm NW-9ONFICANT REMOVE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 27 t....o.:��J'l�.n •ate s'�a''�®,�'.� . • '��Iii•4� to 7:� �j :► �''�,,,�� — a-�:.1�� r .n.►,tw+�+ �4�►i�i� i��,.T •: .lir Iw w� /'r�t���/' �r� �' Ail •� e 1` H-[;-cacrune nz ! e KEY COMMON NAME SCtENFIFlC NAME C NAtAENTAL TREES R00T UAIITITY CMAUAIS Ur BN -2 EYERGREDI ,REXS AA AUS' MAN PINE NNMA - .-----^— 6' Bis a -- -- Bs RACX NUS WM= MAU" WISATA r No is OkIMTORY FREES PIORTIIwOODS tuiPt.E Amt WMN iaFWXO T21' " ae MOS PENNSYLYAMCA PATMCRE PAPAT11011E ASH NI RD F OAKtGUEFICUS RUBRA - LS as e 2.W 30 V. SMIRT. AMU AINA NMTRY 2 SHRUBS Alli ANDORRA .AXWR/AWPERUS NMZONTAUS 'ANDORRA, -am OW.W. KOFIFLILACfSYRNP.l1 YEWN PALABMi' A FCR 1010 CARPET 'ROSE/110" nOM CARPET' ii,of HOLAYS MNITE P01Ql7M3A1 • TFN - MT=U is POT 25 POT 23 03.POT 33 POT (( ENTRANCE PLANTING 110 BE MULCHED AT A Y DEPTH — _ 1„'•. 1 i x \ MULCH TYPE TO BE CHOSEN BY BUILDER/DEVELOPER lI' 5MM BLACK POLY SHEETING TO BE USED UNDER ROCK TREES I `.� LANDSCAPE GRADE BLACK VINYL, EDGING TO BE USED AROUND E14TRANCE PLANTINGS Z.i 1 I i `Qi- t ;Q7p- — �� \ t .� t t. �'. ws.' 4! ii• .�..: :- < /.•f `Y. \: rr•r_:• _ �+.r• .yam .1t I , 33 �>j:. is r•'^'^. r — ` �—' �—\ i t)))) )) t 1—_g_�tL, _it �O ' rte. — ^ h �r-•srr. i , 4` _./ ✓ ..j ��`" 954- - �`.• 4• --/ -•• - ,' ;-- :�» 15, fnlll�w ZE Lp _..._.�:,,..•_• e•,-rtru•• — •.� : .�-956` wP g CN —10 1 6a-.` �..t• , is TREES-DKL _ ,: ', �$ ► j ` 1.1 FCR-� 6 962--- 4 am rT ro DKL-6 I �9 I D� 9 i -�� X/ �, \ �, C �.ra•r .tFCR-� "Pf &,WIN 5�1 PAOK . o � �"" ' w. `:.rr.�: .•y•yy - .. IA - Ar 19 '95a \ � _• � _... S6F---._.._- , )j I, )S I S AL�.S F n1kE PAhKI ' :y .,� i aal -_-• ed ,•• _ 'ri aAl Tat noel . a.d. b.; r. o� • —1 -.. L �. � N BI T. / _ II •. t>� 'q �t:l PAI --- <,�--= - - - - - - -• -�-- � - -- - -- �:-•---••-- - -•� -954- � I � i '�9� � � t• . _M _.. _. .. .. m Lrt- n .3 gI am. S >iT - - . - - a-- �,-t - - - - - - -- -• I PiDNEEFZ " �`- •- ►� �.-----•--�._ _. _ �P riY Easemen peg"D-'1v0"t572913--....._._.-., an rrIg V— . wig was m-tll t1•at irk .. w... IUM1 r.= b. O.&M .w Y • P6 was 4t.m .A (.� t+w or VrAs, my dow www. ~ � t• • t • SHEET TITLE r....... •_.,..�..,. A.414r. .w�viww ,..A IML i a.w •"AAr cw:�x.e 1Wr.«r .wA �.. �. hat,,, LANDSCAPE PLAN TONER —as...o ?r.Ms:...M. Del* 7/1 /0] Dr .LM O.e.n •iH 4 N Attachment 13 4 N', iii lc= iY1 i� wry le- Yli iii !F"= iF<i i �lF iii {i! =f! .� • _:—� - .may ws`_ !� iwI • w wF i—ice- w!� w�_� Un-- _ e ... _� - m.s— L_-. t-,..��..�—�_ tea. � �,•. _ — _ ._ iLt— -�- _moi ii� i i �'�a_il-ice_ --- -- - -- ww—Ni-w w_w =s woo_—tea Attachment 15.. Engineering _Planning Surveying.• Landscape Architecture. KUUSISTO LTD Jan* uary 6 2003REC_ -Mr.. David -Steele- 7645 Steele 7645. L- indale Avenue S: M=* ea-'}�''✓�)olis -MN 55423 � Re: Trip Generation at Ariel Street and County. Road D. Rte % x ?'iS j fl. 2 �v�P7 A - I -f Vi \ Dear Mr. Steele: , RLK-Kuusisto,, Ltd. has completed +our review -and assessment".of the tri eneration potential of pg = the proposed project located at Ariel Street and County Road D 'in Maplewood. In particular, a comparison of the trip generation potential of the proposed 1'00 -unit apartment building. has been compared. with the -potential of the previously approved 90,000 square foot office building. The following discussion summarizes the methodology. and results of -the analysis.. - The number of vehicle trips generated by the proposed development were estimated for the peak hour ,and dally traffic "conditions using the data and methodologies contained 'in. the 6th Edition of Trip Gene ' ation; published:by the Institute of Transportation:Engineers (ITE). The data contained within this reference has been compiled for a number of land uses based on. specific characteristics of these uses such as square feet, number. of 'employees, number of dwelling units, etc. The ITE Land Use, Codes. used for this .assessment were -Apartment =Code .230, and General Office — Code - 710, and the generation estimates were based on the number`. of units_ in' the case- of the. apartments, ,and the square, footage for the office. Table 1 summarizes ,our findings: : Tabled - ' Trip Generation Comparison LAND USE UNITS AM Peak PM Peak DAILY Enter Exit l otai. Enter Exit. , Total ..Apartment'— 100 -dwell -unit 8 ' .. 45 53 .42' . .' .20 62, 663 Off ce, 90;000 ft.sq ' 123 ' . 17 140 23 1.1 l 134 = 991 Difference -115° ' +28 ' -87 1 +19.1 -91 -72 1 -328 _ The information in Table 1 indicates that the proposed change in land use will result in 87 -fewer AM peak hour trips, 72 fewer PM peak hour trips; and approximately. 328 fewer- daily trips being generated by the site. It is note -that .the use change will also result in a variation in peak directional. travel, with a greater number of AM exiting trips and PM entering trips than originally estimated. However, 'the substantial reduction in total traffic generated by the site will result in improved traffic operations on the surrounding roadway network. In conclusion,_the trip generation comparison. indicates the proposed revision from a 90,000 square foot office to a 100 -unit apartment complex will reduce the estimated site generated Offices: Hibbing Minnetonka Ham Lake • Twin Ports . (952) 9.33-0972 6110 BlueCircle Drive Suite 100 .Minnetonka, MN 55343 FAX(952)93.3-1153 Equal Opportunity Employer 31 Attachment 1.6 EngineerinLy Plan Review PROJECT: Sibley Cove PROJECT NO: .REVIEWED BY: Erin Schacht and Chris Cavett DATE:. February 14, 2003 MWF Properties is proposing to construct a 3 -story p g apartment building at the southwest corner of County Road D and Ariel Street. Drainage from the site would be treated in a pond at the south. end of the property. From there, the storm water would outlet into the existing storm sewer on Ariel Street. The storm waterr eventually drains to the _ Maplewood .Heights Fond at northeast corner of white Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue. The applicant or his engineer shalt address the- followm*g comments. Grad n and Drainage plan: .1. Implement additional storm water BMPs into the design of the storm water .management system of the site or revise the pond to meet city ordinances and to meet NURR designs standards. An important BMP suggestion: The applicant is strop encoura ed to include g bio -infiltration basins, (rainwater gardens), around the storm drains north and east of the proposed building and to direct roof and yard drainage to these areas. For more information on bioretention basins please see the Metro council BNT Manual at their web site: http://www.metrocouncil.org/enviroment/Watershed/bmDmanual.htm Rock infiltration sumps can be added to thero osed basins to improve r p p p infiltration:. The sumps should consist of 1.5" of clean, clear rock wra ed in pp Type 5 geotextile filter fabric, (felt). The contractorshall place the topof the rock infiltration sumps about 12 inches below the finished bottom _ of the basin.. The project engineer shall provide a detail and descriptionin thelap of haw the P contractor will prepare the rock sumps. The applicant shall also include a landscapingplan for the infiltration basins (rainwater" gardens) and far the pond. 2. If the project engineer does not include additional BMP' s in the drainage design, then the engineer must revise the design of the NURP pond to meet the phosphorus removal requirement of 60% and the TSS removal requirement of 80%. 3. The plans shall show the pond slopes., The pond must have a.10 -foot bench at a 10:1 wet bench below the NWL. 33 4. Include a silt fence on the east side of the site at the tree preservation ' line. 5. Revise the proposed grading plan. The proposed plan has an error in the contours At the N.E. area of the' site around the tot lot and catch basin. The grades need revising, as storm water cannot be trapped on adjacent property as a result of the grading on this site. (The applicant should consider this area, as well as the nearb' y inlet drains, for locations for rainwater gardens). 6. Direct ail roof drainage into the turf areas to the north and east of the building. 7. Install a 3.0' sump manhole in the boulevard before discharging into the pond. This is so that sediment deposited in the system can be captured and removed before entering the pond. As an alternative, construct another sediment removal system for the pond. In either case, the applicant, as part of the CUP; -must enter into an agreement with the city that the owner will maintain and clean the sump structure or pond as needed or applicable. The BMP maintenance agreement must be signed and executed before the city will grant final occupancy. 8. Provide the City of Maplewood a 10 -foot wide permanent easement for trails; drainage and utilities along the County Road D frontage of the pro : Ply 9.. Construct a 6 -foot -wide concrete sidewalk with a minimum 7 -foot -wide boulevard along the Ariel Street frontage. Utility elan: l . The contractor shall use the sewer service stub on the County Road D side of the wilding, rather than open cutting into Ariel Street. 2. Obtain approvals from St. -Paul Regional Water Service.SPRWS for the ) .( proposed and eNisting water services on the site. Itis our understanding that the SPRWS will not allow the builder to use the .private water main .on the west side of the site. If that 'is the case, the builder shall ` use the water service stubs on County Road D and Ariel Street. Proved, water main or utility easements- to SPRWS, as they require. q Landscape plan: 1. The applicant shall include for city approval a detailed landscap gin plan for the pond. Turf establishment must be with a pre -approved. native -grass seed mixture w/fo.rhes;. (for upland and low land areas as appropriate). The plan also must include trees and shrubbery in the landscaping of theP and ' and the pond area. 34 Attachment 1. 7' LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS David Steele, representing MWF Properties, applied for a change to the- city's land use plan from BC (business commercial) to. -R -3(H) (residential high density). WHEREAS, this change. applies to the undeveloped property located on the south side of County Road D, est of Ariel Street and east of White Bear Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of . this change is as follows: 1. On February 19, 2003, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff p ublished a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to. the surrounding. property owners. The. planning commission gave everyone at the hearing. a chance to speak and present written. statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve the plan amendments. 1. 2. On March 10,'2003, the'city council discussed the land use plan change. ' They*considered reports and recommendations from the -planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. that the city council approve the above-described changes for the following reasons: 1.. This site is proper for and consistent. with the city's goals, objectives and policies for high-density residential, land use in the comprehensive plan. This includes: a. Creating a transitional land use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. b. Being near a collector street, being between two arterial streets and is near open space and shopping and services. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The on-site pond and large setback from Woodlynn Avenue will separate the apartment building from the properties to the south. b. There'sh.ould- be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing. local residential streets. The existing street pattern keeps the apartment traffic separate. from the. existing single dwellings and other residences. c. There should be less traffic from this development than from a commercial development on the same site. The Maplewood City Council. adopted this resolution on March _, 2003. 35 Attachment 18 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. David Steele,' representing MWF Properties, applied for a conditional use . permit (CUP) for the Sibley Cove apartment planned unit .development (PUD). WHEREAS,' thisp ermit applies to the undeveloped property on the south side of -County Road D between Ariel Street and White Bear Avenue. The. legal description is: PARCEL A: The Easterly 239:00 feet of the Westerly 329.31 feet of the Southerly 428.33 feet of the Northerly 681.33 feet of the Northwest'Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section .2, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota. l PARCEL B: That part of the Northwest Quarter. of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Lange- 22, more completely described as follows: Commencing at a point 33 feet South of the North corner of -said Section 2; thence running South on North and South % line of said Section 2, a distance of 615.15 feet to a point; thence East a distance of 90.31 feet to a point; thence North a distance. of 615.15 feet to a point on the South right of -way line of County Road "D"; and thence vilest, a distance of 90.31 feet to .the point of beginning. PARCEL C: The North Ten (N 10) acres of the East Twenty (E 20) acres of the North Half (N 1/) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of Section Two (2); Township Twenty --nine (29) North, Range Twenty-two (22) West, according to the United States Government survey thereof, subject to White Bear Avenue and County Road "D", excepting the following portions thereof, to wit: Except the South One hundred* (S 100) feet thereof; and Except that part thereof lying West of. the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue; and Except that part thereof. described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of County Road "D" and White Bear Avenue; thence running East along the Southerly line of said County Road "D", Seventy --five (75) feet; thence. running South and parallel with the West tine of said Section Two (2), One hundred twenty-five (125) feet; thence West and parallel with the Southerly line of said County Road "D" to a point on the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue; thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said White Bear Avenue to the point of beginning; and Except that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southerly line of County Road "D", a distance of One hundred seventy- five (175) feet Easterly of the Southeast corner of the intersection of County Road "D" and White Bear Avenue; thence running Southerly on a line parallel. with the West section line of. said Section Two (2) for a distance of One hundred twenty -five -(125) feet; thence Westerly on a line parallel to the Southerly right of way line of County Road "Dn to a point, Seventy-five (75) feet Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of White Bear Avenue; thence Northerly on a deflection angle of Ninety (90) degrees to the. Southerly right of way line of said County Road "D"; thence Easterly along said right of way line to the point of beginning; and 36 Except that part thereof described as follows: The West One hundred fifty (WI50} feet. of the East Three hundred sixty. -seven (E 387) feet of the North Three hundred forty and' -fifty hundredths (N 340.50) feet thereof, except County Road "D" .right. of way, and Except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing. at the Southeast corner of White Bear Avenue and County Road -"D"; thence. Easterly along the South line of County Road "D" a distance of One hundred seventy-five (175) feet; thence in a Southerly direction and parallel to the Vilest line of said Section Two (2),.a distance of One hundred twenty-five (125) feet to the point of beginning; thence in a Southerly direction and parallel to the West line of said Section Two (2), a distance of Ninety-five (95) feet; thence in a Westerly direction and parallel to County Road "D" to the Easterly line of White Bear Avenue; and thence Northwesterly along the East line of White .Bear Avenue, a distance of Ninety-five and eleven hundredths (95.11). feet; thence Easterly and parallel to County Road "D" to th.e point of beginning; and Except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at a point on the centerline of County Road "D" and Thirty-three (33) feet East of the centerline of White Bear Avenue; thence in a Southerly direction along the East line of White Bear Avenue, a distance .of Three hundred forty and .eighty-seven hundredths (340.87) feet to -the point of beginning; thence East and parallel with County Road "D", a distance of Three hundred thirteen and ninety hundredths. (313..90) feet; thence South, One hundred fifty-three (S 153:0) feet; thence West and .parallel with County Road "D", a distance of Three hundred eight and sixty-two hundredths (308.62) feet to the East line of. White Bear Avenue; thence in a Northerly 'direction, One hundred fifty-three and- nineteen hundredths (153.19) feet to the point of beginning; and :Except that part thereof'described as follows: Commencing at a point on the Easterly line of White _Bear Avenue, Two hundred twenty and twenty- six hundredths (220.28) feet Southerly of the -Southeast corner -of the intersection of County Road "D" and White Bear Avenue; thence Easterly on a line drawn parallel to the Southerly right of way line of County Road "D", a distance of One hundred sixty, seven and six hundredths (187.081 feet; thence Southerly at an angle of Ninety (90) degrees, a distance of Eighty-seven and fifty hundredths (87.50) feet; thence Westerly on a line drawn parallel to the Southerly right of way line of County Road "D" to the Easterly right of .way line of White Bear Avenue; thence Northerly along. said Easterly line of White Bear Avenue to. the point of beginning; and Except that part of the following described parcel dying Westerly of the Easterly 114.15 feet thereof; That part of the North 10 acres of the East 20 acres of the North Half.of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the. intersection .of the Easterly right-of-way line of White Bear Avenue and the North line of the South 100 feet of said North 10 acres; thence Easterly along said North line of the South 100 feet, a distance of 309.40 feet; thence Northerly at a right angle, 155.94 feet to a point on a line parallel with .and distant 493.50. feet South of the North Line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2; thence Westerly along said parallel line to the Easterly right-of-way line of White Bear Avenue; thence Southerly along said right-of-way line to the point of beginning. All in the NE 114 of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22. (PINs 02-29-22-12-0009, 02-29-22-.12- 0010 and 02-29-22-2.1-0017) 37 operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a, nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water ' run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other. nuisances. -5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6.. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection,. drainage .structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create. excessive additional. costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into 'the development design. 9. The use would .cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject .to_the following conditions: 1. . All construction shall follow the plans date-stamped January 24, 2003. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must .be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 38 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. - On February 19, 2003, the planning. commission recommended that the city council - . approve this permit. 2. On March 10, 2003, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in, the paper and sent notices to the. surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the. hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and- planning commission: NOW, THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described conditional usep ermit, because, 1. The use would be Located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be .in - conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.. . 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a, nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water ' run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other. nuisances. -5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6.. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection,. drainage .structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create. excessive additional. costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into 'the development design. 9. The use would .cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject .to_the following conditions: 1. . All construction shall follow the plans date-stamped January 24, 2003. The city council may approve major changes. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must .be substantially started within one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 38 3.* Have the city engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. -These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, streets., sidewalks, tree and driveway and parking lot plans: In addition, the applicant shall include: ..a. Changes to -the plans to minimize the. loss or removal of natural vegetation including.: keeping and protecting as many of the large trees. along. the north and east property lines (near the daycare center) as possible. b. Revised pians for storm water. pond locations and designs as suggested. or required by the watershed district or city .engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards and shall include best management. practices and rainwater gardens wherever practical. C. A. storm water management plan for the proposal. d. All the .changes and meet all the conditions noted by the city engineer in -the memo dated February 10, 2003: 4. The design of the pond shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall provide the city a 20 -foot -wide drainage and utility easement over the storm sewer pipe between the pond and the Arial Street right-of-way. 5. The developer or contractor shall: , a. Complete all grading for the site drainage and the pond, complete all public improvements and meet all city requirements.. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove any debris,. junk and garbage from the site. d. Install a 6--foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Ariel Street. between County Road D and W6odlynn Avenue-. e.. Provide the city with verification that the apartment building- will meet the state's noise -standards. This shall be. with a study, testing or other documentation. If the noise on this site is. a factor, then the contractor will have to build the apartment building so that it can. meet the noise standards. This may be done with thicker walls, heavier windows, requiring air conditioning or other sound -deadening construction methods. The developer shall. provide ' the city with this documentation before the city will issue a building permit for the apartment building. 6. There shall be no outdoor storage of recreational vehicles,. boats or trailers. 7. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need for day-to-day transportation on site. If Ahe city decides there areexcess parking spaces available on site, then the city may allow the parking of these on site. 8. The developer .shall provide an on-site . storm .shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. It shall have a minimum of three square feet per person for 80% of the planned population. 9. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 39 40 Attachment 19 f Z C . .............. .. . . A P A R T Til 6 til T S �� 28 r epi uary 2003VE . . MAR 0 12003' Ken Roberts City of MaplewoodIL --.---W� MP 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re-: Sibley Cove Apartments We are writing to express our opposition to the Sibley Cove Apartment project. We are owners of the property to. the East of the proposed project and' we oppose both the size of the project- and the change in zoning requested to. allow it to be sited in the business commercial area. t. If We regret the lateness of this letter but we Were only informed of the project a little over a week ago... I have talked to several other. propertyownersin the area who were also surprised by the project. and are also opposed to it. It appears to us that many of the letters informing the neighboring property owners of the meetings were sent to the property addresses rather than the legal addresses of the property owners. Therefore those of us who do not have our business offices at the property were not informed. We also believe that addressing the notice to the store manager, the leasing agent, or the Realtor whose sign is. on the land is an inaccurate way to inform the property owners. This does not achieve the cities goal of effectively notifying the neighboring property owners. I might add that our tax notices and all legal correspondence, including that from the City of Maplewood, all come to our legal mailing. address. When we went through the planning process for our project we were told by the city to find the legal addresses of the surrounding property. owners. We supplied the city with a list that. had both the property address and the legal mailing address of the property owners. It appears that was not done in this case and therefore many property owners were not informed. I have attached a copy of both the list we supplied for Birch Glen and* the list supplied by. Sibley Cove. As you can see the legal mailing address of many of the properties is different from. the street address. This short notice has' put us at 'a disadvantage in .protesting this change to the city land use plan in a timely manner. There for we request that the matter be tabled until all interested parties have a chance to be contacted. Sincerely e Chief Manager, Birch Glen. Apartments LLC 41 3 March, .2003 Ken Roberts City of Maplewood 1 830 East County Road i ;lewood, MN 5510 .e: Sibley Cove Apartments We. are the owners of the property to the east of the proposed Sibley Cove Apartment , complex. we -are - opposed to the size . of the project, they design, and the change in zoning p pp requested to allow it to -be bunt in this business commercial area. Among the reasons we oppose the roj are: ' site surrounded b� s a sty x corr�nercial bu�din . �►�ailding a large three This is an story residential building the meddle detrabt from the neighborhood. and conflict with the exists rets uses such: as the. bar, tire store, and auto mall., The requested zones change will disrupt the natural transition that -nowexists from cor rnerc*al to single fanny property. we feel there is no reason -to make. an exception for this building. This bufldin g is huge! The footprint of.the buildin is man times larger than the g surrounding buildings. In a block of single story businesses this building 'I's three stories t p' with a itched roof above it. Just the wall on the side 'of the L facing to Bear Avenue is longer than a football field. It will be situated on one of the highest pieces of ground in Ramsey County and the upper fl ors and roof will be visible for long dist&noes. There ars other sites for this . - ,e of project such as the open -site on the vest side of the n where there is a large expanse of open land andthe building would not c ' nt�ict with neighboring • ro erties. buildingthis size and design will produce large numbers of schools age children who need room to roam and should not be- fenced in by commercial businesses: w l the oxisting school facilities be able- to handle this concentration of new .children? The traffic study compares a previously approved 90,000. squAre foot office buildings with the proposed apartment. According to iq pl ring there has newer been an office building- approved for this site.. Given the problenis associated -with the power- lines and the pipeline which cross the property ewe doubt, a building that size would ever be built. A mare .likely use would be a 45,000 to 50:000 square. foot office park or office condos. This wound generate less traffic at the property than the avartme�nt bullding. �►rzd, unlike y anartn� nt, this traffic wouid not be concentrated on evern4s. and weekends when the p area Wfic is already at its peek. 42 Z 'heh we went through the process to get Birch Glen approved the city concerned was with that large a building in that area. At cit request we- made many changes- designed to mala the building appear smaller and more appealing. ' we broke the building into- two sections with a decorative distinctive entry area separating then. We changed the ` footprint of the building to provide bumped out . areas to- brew up the long l* - s o the buflding. we added snore decks nth dormer roofs. over the • also' to break tip the long Unes of the building. We even added dormers to our. detached garage anal ' bricked -the rear Of the gam a at the specific request of the city. we feelwe roduced the high quality building the city mrantad for this neighborhood. 1 We believe that Sibldy Cove should be held to the sane standards. At 100 units the proposed building • is much larger than our estin 60 unit building. and will be much easier .to see from white Bear Avenue; `fie design is a simple L shape with nothingto break u p the long massive walls and ro6f. The all fatting white Bear Avenue is abouts Ian as our entire budding and does not contain anything to break. it up. There are no decks, no building protrusions, no roof line changes, nothing to brew. up the massive walls. It 'i s exacts the type . of building we were not allowed to build in that area. we fe6i there is n0 reason oto �e r a e cept�on -to Ion standing zomng and design requu=ents for this prt,sect. sincml J Bob Enkers Chiu` Manager Birch Glen Apartments I,I✓ 43 } DRAFT MINUTES ;OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD BEAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA.. .WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2003 b. Sibley Cove Apartment Building (County Road D) Mr. Roberts said Mr. David Steele, representing MWF Properties, is proposing.to build a 1007unit a artment building.' He. is.proposing this project on a 7.1 -acre site on the . south side of County p . Road D between.White Bear Avenue and Ariel Street. The project.would be a 3 -story apartment building with underground parking for 100 cars. In addition, the plans show 100. surface parking spaces and 18 future parking spaces on the site.. The building would have a mix. of 86 two- bedroom units and 14 three-bedroom units and a storm shelter in. the garage area of -the building. Mr: Roberts said to build the proposed apartment. building Mr. Steele wants the city to change -the land useP lan for the site. This change would be from BC (business commercial) to R-3 (H) _ (residential high density). The city intends R-3.(H).areas for a variety of housing including double .dwelling s,' town houses or apartments of up to- 16.3. units per. gross acre. - For BC (business . commercial) areas, the city plans for offices,' clinics, restaurants, day care centers and retail businesses. Mr. Roberts said the applicant has applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for . -a planned unit development- (PUD) for the 100 -unit apartment development. They are requesting the CUP because the BC (business' commercial) and LBC (limited business commercial) zoning districts limits the uses on the site to commercial, -office and retail uses and requires a CUP for multiple- dwellings.. Commissioner Trippier asked if the sidewalk that was just put in on the north side is going to be partof this development? Mr. Roberts said'yes. Commissioner Trippler said he had a complaint regarding the Birch Glen Apa.rtment site. When he went to the site,_ at the end... of the building on the- south -side, there were two large BFI dumpsters with garbage spilling out of them. He .asked why are. the dumpsters are sitting there and -if the are permitted? When he of to the.end of the development. that goes behind the Y p g building in the area of 2029 and. '198S Woodlynn Avenue, he saw one dumpster after another,' -He said there are at least 2 metal storage containers that look like they have been there forever. He thinks it looks really bad there and if this proposal is going to be developed he believes it is going to be a real eye sore. He wondered who is responsible for getting this area cleaned up? Mr.. Roberts said one of the developers of Birch Glen Apartments. is in the audience and maybe he can speak regarding this situation. He said this development is just finishing up and if it p g g doesn't get cleaned up the city will be making a phone call to the developer. H.e said it sounds like a planner and the Environmental Health Officer need to visit the site.. Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the planning commission. The applicant Mr. David Steele, representing MWF Properties, residing at 4807 Slater Courtin Eagan, addressed the commission. He handed a bookletrout to the planning commission. He discussed some issues but they will be. dealt with at the CDRB meeting .on February 25, 2002. Commissioner Mueller said he noticed in the booklet that was handed out it says future addition and . wondered what that meant? Mr. Steele said that future addition refers to the 80 units that will be. done in Phase I and the 20 units done in Phase II, which total 100. units. Mr. Roberts said the staff recommendation is for all 100 units so this does not have to come back to the planning commission again for approval. He said itis fine if the developer chooses to build r p g it in two phases. Chairperson. Fischer asked if anybody else would like to speak regarding this development. Mr. Pat FiahertY with Birch Glen Apartments addressed the planning commission.. He said the garbage dumpsters are rolled out for 1 hour on Tuesday mornings and 1 hour on Friday mornings :for pick up, otherwise they are stored in the trash area in the building until pickup day. Commissioner Tri ler said he was at the site�on Monda Februa 17, which was President's pP Y rY Day and he questioned why the garbage was out if the dumpsters aren't rolled out until Tuesday morning for one hour? Mr. Flaherty said he did not -know why it was- out then. Mr. Flaherty said he is opposed to this development being built. He -is concerned do they need' . more apartments in this general idea? Birch Glen Apartments is only at 50% full now. When he p came before the.commission two years ago he thought he had a nice building to be built. Mr. Flahertysaid the lannin . commission said his building was -'a very unimaginative building P g p. p g ro osed and he disa reed with the planning commission. In his opinion, the proposal for Sibley Cove is very unimaginative. He said there are no decks, . i.t is very plain .and it looks like a warehouse. He feels it will be detrimental to the housing stock in the area. He was not allowed to build this building two years ago so why should this developer be allowed to? He spent several hundred thousand dollars adding dormers and other- features to his building. for approval. He wondered what work -force housing means? M.r. Flaherty. asked if that is a politically correct term for Low-income housing or subsidized - housin ? He said if it is low-income housing,. he does not g g want it.across the street from his development. He said he has a vert' nice building and does not want subsidized housing there. He was told this was going to be business commercial and that is What. he would like to see there.: He does not think there needs to be more apartments in this - area especially. since his building is, only 50% rented. He thinks this developer should be held to p Y g the .same or better standards that he. was for Birch Glen Apartments. Commissioner, Rossbach. said it was the CDRB that required Birch Glen Apartments to have - dormers and'other features added to the building. He thought Birch Glen Apartments was too large e of a buildin for the foot rint� of land and he still thinks that. He believes the. CDRB will g g p require Sibley Cove Apartments to add similar features to their building as well. .a - Commissioner Mueller stated Birch Glen Apartments is only.y 50%. rented. Either this developer is p stupid for wanting to build when the rental market. is not renting to full capacity or the developer of Birch Glen Apartments has too small of a vision for competition to be out there. Mr. Flaherty said there were three new apartment complexes built recently in the surrounding areas. They are all at 50% capacity. The market for. rental hous.in.g has slowed .in the last couple of . years.. The interest rates have .been low so people that were renting are now. getting into housing that they could not get into before. It has affected the rental market. The last thing he needs is -to have a building that. -is a much lesser quality than he was. allowed to build to be in direct competition with his building. :The building he was allowed to build cost more. If this developer is allowed to build a cheaper building the rent will. be Lower than Birch Glen's is. He said he wants a level playing field. Commissioner Tripp ler asked Mr. Flahertyif. he has heard of the Hajicek property that.is going to be developed on the other side. of Maplewood Mail? Mr. Flaherty said yes. Commissioner Trippler said .once those buildings are built Birch Glen- Apartments will be- fully rented. If the Sibley..Cove. Apartments are - not as nice as -the Birch. Glen Apartments then - his building will look nicer the. the Sibley Cove Apartments. Mr. Flaherty said he' just wants this developer to be held to the same criteria and standards as he was'. Chairperson Fischer clarified work force housing used to be called affordable -housing... It was - housing within certain rental cost factors that were determined by Metropolitan Council` or HUD and is based on median income in the- area. Mr. Roberts said the term "work force housing is for young professionals trying to get into their first or second rental property. The renters are typically -entry -leve! workers starting outat a lower income not making a lot of money. An example wou-Id be a police officer, teacher etc. just starting out. Mr. Roberts said Mr. Flaherty's associate called him today with comments regarding p this roposal but he did not have time to get the comments ready for the meeting. He -will provide comments for the CDRB meeting on Tuesday, February 25, 2003. Commissioner Mueller moved to approve the resolution -on page .3.8 of the staff report. This resolution changes the land use plan from BC (business- commercial) to R-3 (H) (residential high density) for the 7.1 -acre site of the"Sibley Cove housing. development. The city bases these changes on the -following findings: 1. This site is er ro for and consi-stent with the city's goals, objectives and policies for high - p p Y density residential land- use in the comprehensive plan. This includes: a. Creating a transitional land -use between the existing residential and commercial land uses. b. Being near a collector -street, between two arterial streets and would be near open space and shopping and services. 2. This development will minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties because: a. The on-site pond and. large setback from Woodlyn Avenue will separate the. apartment building- from the properties to the south. b. There should be no significant traffic increase from this development on existing local residential streets. The .existing street pattern keeps the apartment traffic separate from the existing single dwellings and other residences. c. There should be .les.s traffic from this development than from a commercial development on the same site. Commissioner Mueller moved to approve the resolution starting on page 39 of. the staff report. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for. a planned. unit development for: the Sibley Cove apartment development on County Road D, west of Ariel Street. The city bases this approval on .the findings. required by code.' (Refer to the resolution for the specific findings.) pp g . : Approval is subject to the following conditions: 10 All .construction shall follow thep lans date-stamped January 24, 2003. The city council may - approve major changes.. The,.,dire.ctor of community development may approve minor changes. J 2. Thero osed construction'. must be substantially started within one year of council approval p p or the. permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. *Have- the city g en ineer a pp rove' final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading utility, drainage, erosion control, streets,'sidewalks, tree and driveway and parking- lot plans. In. addition, the applicant- shall include: a. Changes to the plans to minimize the loss or removal of natural vegetation including. g keeping and,. protecting as many of the large trees along the north and .east property lines' (near the daycare center) as possible. . bRevised plans for storm water pond locations and designs as suggested or required by. the watershed district or city engineer. The ponds shall meet the city's design standards. and shall include best management practices and- rainwatergardenswhereverpractical. C. A storm. water management plan for the proposal. d. All the -changes - and meet all the conditions noted by the -city.eng'ineer in the memo. dated February 10, 2003., 4.. The design. of the pond shall be subject to,the approval of the city engineer. The developer shall provide. the city a 20 -foot -wide drainage and utility easement. over the storm. sewer pipe between the pond and. the Ariel Street right-of-way. 5. The developer or contractorahall: a. Complete all grading- for the site drainage and the pond, complete.' all. public improvements and meet all city requirements. b. *P.lace temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Remove any debris, junk and garbage from the site. d. Install a 6 -foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the west side of Ariel Street. between he south property line of the .daycare center -and the sidewalk north of Woodlynn Avenue. e. Provide the city with verification that the apartment building will meet.the state's noise standards. This shall be with a study, testing or other documentation. If the noise on this site is a factor, then the contractor will have. to build the apartment building so that it ..can meet the noise standards. This may be done: with thicker walls, heavier windows, requiring .air conditioning or 'other sound. deadening construction. rnethods. The developer .shall provide the city. with this documentation -before the city will issue a building permit for the apartment building. 1 There shall be no `outdoor storage .of recreational vehicles, boats. or .trailers._ 2. Residents shall not park trailers and vehicles that they do not need -for day-to-day transportation on site. If the city decides thereare excess parking spaces available on site, then.lthe city may allow the parking of these on site. 3. The developer shall provide. an on-site storm shelter in the apartment building. This shelter shall be.subject to the approval of the director of emergency preparedness. .It shall have a. Y minimum of three square feet.per person for 80% of the planned. population. 4�8 The city council shall review this permit in. one year. *The developer must complete these conditions before- the city issues a grading permit or a building permit. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes -- Fischer, Monahan-Junek,. Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach., Trippler Commissioner Rossbach made a recommendation to 'the CDRB.and City Council ' that the applicant should .be held to the.same,or similar design standards as the Birch Glen Development at 3100 Ariel Street. Commissioner. Mueller seconded. Ayes- Fischer, Monahan-Junek, Mueller, Pearson, Rossbach, Trippier The motion passed. This item will go to the CDRB on Tuesday, February 25, 2003, and to the city council meeting on Monday March 10, 2003. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2003 I. VII. DESIGN REVIEW a. Sibley Cove Apartments resentin MWF Properties, is proposing Mr. David. Steele, rep g p � p p g to build a 100 -unit apartment He is proposing this ro'ect on a 7:1 -acre site on the south side. of County Road D building..p p g p 1 between White Bear Avenue and. Ariel Street. The project would be a 3 -story apartment buildingwith underground ..parking for 100 cars. In addition, the plans show 10.0 surface g p g parking spaces and 18 future parking -.spaces on the site. p g p Ms.. Finwall said the building would have a mix of 86 two-bedroom.. units and 14 three-bedroom and a storm shelter in the garage area of the building. Ms. Finwall said since the original .units g g . staff report dated February11 2003, the tanning comrnissio.n and the developers of the Birch p ry p . a artments have ex ressed concerns regarding the design of the building for Sibley. _ _.Glen p p The'developers, ers of Birch. Glen- Apartments want the city to require the same level. of. Cove.. p p til and design in thisbuildin as was required of them. Upon further review it appears the detail, g g builder could do more with the exterior of the building. In the staff report dated.. February 21, .2 003,03 staff indicated seven items of change which include changing some of the windows to pato doors and or to ba or bow .windows, adding more brick, particularly to the County Road. and or different materials which would include shakes or shingles to the D .side, adding gables a . ends and adding a band. stri tetween the second and third floor windows. Also .adding gable g p tails to the north end of the- facing County Road -D, staggering or windows and other de g Ion runs of the building on the west and the* south sides to change the plains of . breaking the g g . des and, adding other vertical elements.. These design elements were shared with Mr. the facades g . Steele who expressed concerns over three items, including changing some of . the windows to. Se p . doors and or to -bow or baywindows, adding gables. and staggering or breaking the long. pato d . building. Staff recommends approval of the design review with the additional . runs of the g pp . building design elements. tan does not show any. landscaping or ground treatment for the ponding The landscaping p y area or any rainwater .gardens. rson Ledvina asked staff about the. trash enclosures. y chairperson . the trash enclosures would be located within the Ms. Finwall said the applicant indicated that underground parking garage. •respond -.t o the 80 units to be built in Phase I and the Chairperson Ledvina asked staff to additional 20 units to be built in Phase 11. He said it appears the building elevations do _ not Show the additional 20 units. Properties, 4807 Slater Court in Eagan, addressed theMr. David Steele representing MWF boaMr. Steele said they.would not be building the additional 20 units unless the 80 units rd. are. 95% rented out. Phase II could be built in two years, five years or it may never happen at all, depending on how the building is rented out. area on the south side of the development they couldn't have any He said in the easement a trees or put an fencin u because of -the power lines. He plans on putting avegetable .any'fencing p en in that area for the residents to use. • They will try to do . everything they can to. s gardave the to the building. They do not want • .. trees. Some of the trees are too close to the proximity. due • plant bushes or trees too close to the people's windows. for .security reasons. This was a to recommendation .from the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department. Board member Olson asked Mr. Steele about the parking., • I be 82 underground parking s aces, and another 20 Mr. Steele said in Phase I, there would g p ed in Phase II under round, lus there will be 100 parking spaces outside. parking spaces add g p • had an color renderin s or samples of materials Chairperson Ledv�na asked Mr. Steele if he y g to show -the board? • samples with him but there is a photo. in the staff report Mr. Steele said he does not have any samp e sh•owin9 the colors they are using. ' report differ from the colors he submitted. tonight-, Board member Olson . said the colors in the one lookedpink and the other looked orange. • oloration problems with co ing. He asked the Mr. Steele said the colors differ because of the c p pY architect to come forward and talk about the. colors that would be used on the building.. ' ' 2 Meadowlark Drive Stillwater,. addressed the McCellan architect, residing at 163 � . James 9 M r. J a , board. The colors would be earth -toned colors of rust and cream. • e 20 units to Chairperson Ledv�na asked how the be added in Phase II will look?. Mr. McCellan ,said you would not be able to tell there was an addition added because they would changing Id not be chan in the exterior materials at all. . on said. he wondered what percentage the building had to be rented Board member Jorgenson out before the next phase would begin.. You have the tenants who. would have to.- be living next p g to. the building being. added onto.. Mr. Steele • said he realizes you have to make some concessions to those tenants for the noise.. . onstruction. There is no way they would want to start construction. and inconvenience during c Y until the are filled at least at 95%. Y . � applicant regarding Chairperson Ledvina has questions for the app g g the exterior of the building. Mr. Steele .said he could not change the windows to patio doors and put_ any decks on this building. The reason is it could add over $1000 per unit to the project. This is work force housing and adding these design elements could price him right out of this. project. They have already added. the storm shelter and underground parking which has added $500,000 to the project. The planning commission requested that this building be held to the same or similar design standards as the Birch. Glen Apartments. There are elements in the Birch Glen Apartment design that he would not want on his building. He agrees the ends of the building need to' be dressed up. He does not like their deck design. and. he does not think it is attractive at all. Decks are a hazard for kids, people. have a tendency to break the law and grill on decks, Birch Glen Apartments. have* a deck.design with a glass enclosure, he feels it is a- bad. design for Minnesota. because the decks -fill up with snow. If you use- wood. construction for decks the wood gets rotten. Building off sets could create problems with the. parking and the garage design and the expense. is huge, Board .. member Olson asked Mr. Steele if there is anything he can do to add to the vertical.'. .enhancements to the exterior of the building to . break it up more? Mr. Steele said Birch Glen Apartments added, vertical elements by installing decks and he does not want to do that. Mr. McCellan said they could put a horizontal stripe between the second and third floor.. He said in terms of the placement* of :the windows they could put .them . in. a random pattern but he prefers them to be in.a symmetrical pattern. Maybe the cement board could be continued in a -vertical pattern in. some areas but he does not know if that would enhance the appearance too Much. They felt the gables on the roof and the different treatments of the horizontal siding make this an attractive product to . begin with. Maybe they could do something with the north .end on County Road D. Board. member Jorgenson said in -lieu of' decks maybe larger windows could ' be added to increase ventilation for the tenants? Maybe. by having a larger window in the living room area it would give a bit more architectural look to the building. Mr. Steele said, that .would be a good idea. but the issue is the cost. He has to go back to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency - (MHFA) .for $500,000 for the. extra expense for -the The have talked about putting in . patio doors with a french balcony. The .french garage. Y , balcony is not a. deck but has a 6 -inch,. projection with tight verticals on. the rails so children cannot stick their headsthrough it: Safety is a large issue in apartments with children. He said these may have to be .custom built and they don't know the cost for.. something like this. He does not want_ to be held to anything right now. Board member Olson asked if these are functioning windows? Mr. Steele said yes. Board member Olson said she does not think having a larger window would make it look nicer; she likes the size of the windows with the muttons on them. It will. reduce . the size of the interior wall with. a larger window size. Chairperson Ledvina asked where the gas and electrical meters would be located? Mr. McCelian. said the meters. would be located in the underground garage. Mr. Steele asked. if he could bring g the changes to the east and north ends of the building. to the city council? Chairperson Ledvina said it is difficult for the board to make a recommendation without all the details and specifics. He feels very uncomfortable about this. �He said it is a possibility but not the standard way of operation. Mr. Steele said he does not mean to make this :a gray situation for the board. Chairperson Ledvina asked M.r. Steele if it was possible to _make the changes, bring in samples of materials and have a more complete presentation for the board to make a recommendation to the city council for the .next CDRB.meeting? Mr. Steele asked when the next CDRB meeting is.. J . Chairperson Ledvina said Tuesday, March 11, 2003. Mr. Steele said no, : because. the city council -meeting is Monday, March 101 2003, and he .said he is under penalty of death to make that city council meeting. Ms. Finwall said it appeared the Phase 11. portion was not addressed too well in the staff report. She* said this apartment building will be approved' by the city council as a PUD and any change to the .site plan will require a revision. The additional 20' units will have to ' come back to. the CDRB if and when that would happen. The CDRB is. just. approving the 80 units lonight. The applicant submitted a revised landscaping plan and -staff. has not had an opportunitylo review those. plans so she would recommend the board refer to the plans date stamped. January 14, .2003. Regarding: the additional design elements for the building, the applicant said that he would be willing to make the following changes: patio doors with a French balcony, depending on cost, additional brick, different materials such as shingles to the -gables, and vertical design elements, adding windows to the. north end of the building. The . CDRB -could. recommend approval with., these, additional design elements and if the applicant is still unwil-ling to implement these: recommendations he could appeal. the decision to the -city council. Chairperson Ledvina asked if anyone from the public would. like to speak regarding_ Sibley Cove Apartments? Mr. - Bob Bankers, representing Birch Glen Apartments, addressed the board. He said -they are not happy with the design. of Sibley Cove. They went through this exact thing two years ago for Birch Glen Apartments. :The concern two years ago. was Birch Glen was going to be three - stories tall sitting in an area with single story buildings. He said Sibley Cove is proposing to do what the city would not let Birch. Glen build. They broke the. building into two pieces, with hip roofs on both. sides, they added decks ,and they spent a lot of money, because the city told .them they had to. Their building is very nice now and they are opposed to the Sibley cove owners building a lesser quality building. He said it would have been nice if they could have built their building as it was for less money, but they couldn't and Sibley Cove should not be able to then either. Board. member Olson. said she thinks Birch Glen Apartments are very attractive and she wishes Sibley Cove had proposed as nice of an apartment building. Mr. Bankers said.Sibley Cove has a building .that looks like a warehouse and it .has no character, to it. Bankers if he thinks the have higher quality tenant because Board member Olson asked .Mr. B y a g . of the added desi n features on their building? g . ks the area reciative for such an attractive . looking Mr. Bankers said yes, and..he thin y pp ' . He said there was a lot of concern. expressed by the city when they. proposed 60 building . and thisproposal is oin o have 100 units. He said the building has no units at Birch Glen a going bump outs, it is g flat and straight and it will .dominate the whole neighborhood. The architectural . -the put on. their buildin accomplished the. goal and it makes .ia less intrus detailsy p give in' the . orhood. He is sor if the developers of Sibley Cove have to spend more money, but . neighb ry d to s end more mone for Birch Glen to get a nicer building and it was.worth it in the they had p Y id the want a level playing round and they don't want a building lesser in quality end. He sa y p Y g g . then the building they built. r Jorgenson said. he is not comfortable, making a decision on. this proposal Board . membeg ut:knowin more details. There are too many.questions in this proposal. _ If there were witho g . like to have more information instead of going ahead. and.. making a quick time he would - approval. There is no information on the rainwater gardens. He said it is a large building and details added 'to it.' He is. happy to see the developer is. building it needs more..design r round ara es� and .that will be a huge attraction..for people. unde g g g . Board member Olson .said she would second that statement. She said there was no ' t the storm water and which appears to have moved around on the plans, she d�.scuss�on about p pp feel for the gardens for the residents, the fencing on the perimeter of the would . like a betterg property between the auto mall on the west side is very practical, as opposed to trying to put trees in there. She would like the shin .les added and the brick banding added.. She is not that another horizontal stripe, it isn't ging to .solve any. vertical problems. She crazy about adding ano p g ' of the scope of the buildin but in looking at the plans, the trees depicted wasp .t really thinking p g . e illustration make the building look smaller then it will. really be. She said the tree size is on the g the size of Birch Glen, Sibley Cove will have more units. This will deceiving, but afterseeing and it really needs the elements added. She said the colors of the building be a large bu.ilding y - illustration copies. and- she wishes the applicant would have brought . are confusing from the. p samples of the materials that are beingused. There is a lot to be considered before the CDRB can make an approval and she does not feel comfortable. making a recommendation to the city., council not knowing complete information. • same way., This project is not complete and it could use. Chairperson Ledvina said he feels the s y p 1 There are a lot of issues that are not finalized. more work. The . ' ' Ledvina said Birch Glen Apartments- feels Sibley Cove should be held to the same Chairperson p . . i is not level playing field. He is- concerned about the 20 additional standards and feels this p y g units to be added in Wand and how that works with the 80 units for Phase .I. He would like for that _addition or 'l units. He feels very . to see .plans Just not approve the 20 additiona uncomfortabl approving the staff recommendation of the 100 units when .they propose 80 e app g ter. He does not necessarily units now and 20 la Y like fencing and he thinks berms and plantings can be done in p g Lace .of fencing. Mr. Steele said he has an extreme time crunch but the board asked if this could be. tabled and have it come back for the next meeting. Mr. Steele asked the board to respectfully ectfull not table this item. The -rainwater. gardens are a e will. need guidance on this, the are working with Chris Cavett, Assistant new concept .and they g Y Fencing d tree placement have endless opportunities and that can be City Engineer. Fe g anp in to. make the architectural changes and bring it back to the city . discussed. .They are willing g . council on March 10., .2003. ' ' ' required to act on this ro osa.l within 60 days and the deadline for . Ms.. Finwall said the city �s requ. p p Y this -proposal is March 24, 2003. If this was tabled, it could come back to the CDRB on March - 11 , 2003, and then go_ to the city council on March 24, 2003. Chairperson Ledvina stated. then it is possible to table this based. on the city's time line. Ms.. Finwall said yes. this proposal it will.dela his project b at least one month. Mr. Steele said if the CDRB tables p . p Y p J Y the earliest the can start this project is April 15 2003. The. MHFA has .certain He said y p J windows of time for their board meetings and waiting for them could hold this protect up until t kes about seven months to build the building and a month delay can make them. May .15. It a : lose the window of opportunity ortunity for paving in the fall. Under the current schedule pp they want to start bu-ildin Aril 15 2003, and have it completed and paved by the end of. November. This g p waythe building -would be leased by the.- beginning of December.. He said to table this protect g . would cost this development hundreds of thousands of dollars. �ir erson Ledvina said the board - is. uncomfortable with the level of detail that has been Chap provided and )the amount of* work that needs to be done. At the same time the applicant has time schedules to follow.* He said this is where the board is with this proposal. Board member. Olson said this is a large development evelo and the impact will be substantial -and p . will be here a Ion time. She said the board feels that -because of all the issues this building g ved. the need more than 20 minutes -to review this, especially with .all . that have not been.reso.l y . of the design elements'that have not been finalized. • n use chane as well as a CUP for the planned . Ms. F�nwall, said this proposal requires a land g unit developmentg and the design review. If the land .use plan and the CUP are in place the rd has the authorit to a rove the design elements without being reviewed _design review boa y pp ' council. She said the only time cit council would be involved with the design review is by city cou Y Y s an appeal from the applicant on the design review was brought �f there was pp pp ht to the city council. of a land use ro osal. .Therefore, staff could bring the land -use plan and CUP to the as part -proposal. council on March 10 2003, and bring back the design review to the CDRB March 11, city c g 2003. Ms. F�nwall said this way the applicant can meet his timeline and the CDRB's concerns can be The.onl issue is if. the a licant wanted 'to appeal the CDRB's worked through.only_ pp recommendation lo -the city council it would not be heard until March 24, 2003. a Board member Jorgenson moved to table this item until further information is provided to the board for the meetin on Tuesday, March 11, 2003. g seconded.' Ayes- Jorgenson, Ledvina, Olson Commissioner Olson se Y g The motion is tabled. • 1 2003 and it will come back to the CDRB with This item goes to the city council on March 0, , changes'on March 11, 2003. Chairperson. Ledvina said. the board would Like the a -licant to work with stuff in addressing p pp t -he issues identified in the staff report dated February 21, 2003. Recognizing the applicant has a, concern with b�reakin u p the. fa ade, and the issues of patio doors and or bay or bow g p � windows. The board wants to identify that they are looking at 80 units only unless the a cant' provides details for the .'. 100 units. More detail is needed for preserving the pp vegetation on the east side of. the site near the daycare center. He said.they should look at the possibility :of varying the size .of -the windows but. maintaining the detail of, the'windows.- Looking at the possibility of french balconies and the applicant should provide samples of materials with color schemes of .the materials to show the board. Chairperson Ledv.ina said he - has a concern with the main entrance of -the building where the drop off area is. He said there could be an additional architectural element added there like Birch Glen Apartments has done showing a°prominent main. entrance. Board. member Olson wants the applicant to. look at the issue -of shingles on the gables. and sta erin the Ion horizontal runs. Regarding the. fencing .issue., where is it 'going to be and Staggering g what is it going to look like? She said: the- Lighting 'plan. needs to be. resubmitted for. the driveway and the tot lot, which are- for safety.' This development needs sidewalks -and she would like the sidewalks made clear on. the plans. Board member Jorgenson said he wants to 'see the final landscaping plan, define where the storm water ponding area .will. be, have a clear plan for the vegetable garden area and the entrance needs to be moreprominent. He would also like to know -where the entrance to the tot lot will be. 9 f3 Pir i d .......... F : Name first & last) -please print Address crt t r t 1. Pj too - ��: r 11r .............. SS'4 do e j VIIA 4. - VVV'' ��� 5f i 0 A 9 f3 Pir i d .......... F Agenda # MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director SUBJECT: Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment and. Conditional Use Permit - Sandy Lake Soccer Fields LOCATION: County Road B to the West of 1-35E DATE: March 4, 2003 INTRODUCTION Project Description The City of St. Pau -i's Department of Parks and Recreation is proposing to develop asix-field outdoor soccer park on the northerly portion of the St. Paul Water Utility -property south of County Road B. Refer to the maps on pages 14-17. This property is part of the Sandy Lake lime disposal area for the St. Paul Regional Water Services. The applicant is proposing that these. soccer fields would be used during daylight periods only. There would not be lights for night play. There would be 235parking spaces plus a lavatory. building. The applicant proposes to buffer the playing fields by. providing a 309 -foot -wide wooded area along the south side of the fields and by g addin to the existing trees on the north/northwest side of the site. This soccer complex would fill a need for additional soccer fields needed by the City of St. Paul. The fields would be used for regular game scheduling as well as for tournaments. Refer to the applicant's written data on pages 18, 19-20 and 21-23. Development of this area with the proposed soccer facility would not happen quickly. If the. Maplewood City Council approved this request, the applicant must still secure financing and draft detailed plans. Completion may not occur until 2005 or 2006. Requests The applicant is requesting that the city council approve: 1. A comprehensive land use plan amendment from OS (open space). to P (Park)., 2. A conditional use permit (CUP) for this soccer park. City code requires a CUP for any public service or public building use. BACKGROUND Soccer Complex The City of St. Paul and Ramsey County Parks Department presented this proposal to the Maplewood Parks Commission in the fall of 2001. The parks commission held two public meetings—the first on September 17, 2001 and the second on November 19, 2001. At both meetings nearby residents expressed strong opposition to this project. 1 have enclosed the background data on this as a separate attachment. On November 19, 2001, the parks commission moved to "no longer take an active role in the review and development of the. Sandy Lake Soccer Project." On June 20, 2001, the Maplewood City. Council passed a resolution statin "the Ci of Maplewood 9 City p encourages the City- of St. Paul and Ramsey County to work together to locate and develop soccer fields at Sandy Lake." They further resolved "'that the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County are hereby authorized and directed to pursue a plan for the development of public outdoor recreational facilities at the Sandy Lake site working in collaboration with the. .St. Paul Regional Water Services with a majority of costs to be borne by the City of St. Paul . and/or Ramsey County.)' " The council « further resolved, that any plan resulting from the process must be acceptable and ultimately_ approved by the City of Maplewood andthat said plan is subsequent)Y ject subto thea royal of the pp Board -of St.- Paul Regional Water Services and the City of St. •Paul." have attached a memo from Bruce Anderson, the Maplewood Parks and Recreation Director, erector, explaining these happenings in better detail. Refer to pages 26-27. 1 have attached his memo along with supporting correspondence, council resolution and minutes from the parks commission meetings in Attachment 22, a separate attachment. . Site History as a Spent—Lime Lagoon February 27, 1989: The city council approved a CUP for the St. Paul Water Utility P to remove u to 130, 000 cubic yards of spent lime per year over a five-year .period. June 10, 1996: The pity council approved a CUP and design plans for.the expansion of the solids dewatering facility. P p August 11, 1997: The city council granted a. CUP for.the mining of the four dew9gaterin lagoon's to the .north of Roselawn Avenue and west of the Jackson .Street homes. This. permit was to allow the water utility to remove line from these four lagoons. One condition. of this CUP was the submittal of a landscape plan for the area around these four lagoons. March 30, 1998: The city council approved the lagoon -landscape plan. DISCUSSION Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment Open Space vs. Park The.subject property has been designated as open space since the -adoption of the first comprehensive pian. Open space land is intended to provide a reasonable balance to developed urban land. Open spaces typically. include environmental protection areas (wetlands and floodplains), lakes, cemeteries, natural drainage courses and golf courses. Parks conversely,are active recreational areas. and provide for specific recreationalactivities (baseball, basketball, soccer, etc.) . The city code does not list any required findings for approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. P The comprehensive plan, however, describes the following mission statement and goals for park and trail development. 2 The purpose of the Maplewood parks, open space and trails sten is to provide a comprehensive, e, balanced and sustainable system of parks, open spaces/natural areas, trails and leisure -oriented activities/programs for city residents to use and enjoy in as cost-effective manner as possible. .. Goals • To provide city residents with parks and natural areas for recreational uses as visual/physical diversions from the hard surfacing of urban develo ment and as a means to . main. p tarn the character, ambience, appearance and history .of the community. • To maximize the recreational opportunities available to cit residents through the, . Y 9 development of fair and equitable working partnerships between the city and the local school district, adjacent cities, county, churches and .civic organizations. • To provide city residents with an interconnected trails stem for transportation and recreation Y p purposes and as a means to tie divergent parks and open -space to the broader -community. Essentially, -though, _we must consider if a soccerark like this is a ro nate for this location. P pp p n What are the potential positive and negative impacts. of this project? Positive Impacts • It would convert an unattractive and -unusable lime pit to an attractive and usableP ark facility. It would create and foster a cooperative working relationshi with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County. P • It would. serve as a regional recreational facility.. This is advantageous since recreation is a regional activity and not confined to community borders. • The fields would also. only be used about half of the year when the seasons allow. This is a minimal use compared to the -impacts- of other development scenarios like residential development or commercial activity. • 1 have included a memo from Parks and Recreation Director, Bruce Anderson,. regarding g g Maplewood soccer field. usage. See pages 24-25. Mr. Anderson has stressed the benefit of the proposed Sandy Lake facility since .it would allow relief for our existing heavily -used heavil -used soccer fields. The City of St. Paul will also be responsible for the maintenance, security. and :overall supervision of this complex. Negativepacts Based on the survey responses we received, the most -often' noted concerns were: • Traffic increases and impact on the area. 3 • Eloise potential causing disturbance to the nei9 hborhood. • Litter from the facility. Conditional Use Permit Parks. are a typical land use found in residential areas. The city strives to provide. recreational'.opporunities for its residents. The applicant. is also proposing. a 309 -foot setback from the fields to the abutting residential .properties to the south and about 100-150 feet of setback from the abutting residential properties to .the northwest. They propose to create. a -wooded buffer in these setback areas or add to the trees that are there already. The proposed landscaping and soccer fields p 9 grassy Y would certainly be an improvement over its current state. Staff wishes to stress the positive benefits of this proposal. As mentioned the applicant i p � PP s proposing a substantial landscaped buffer. The 309 feet of trees proposed on the south side of the site and: the 100 -150 -foot wooded buffer on the north-northwest side is a- verygenerous. se 9 setback and buffer area. The typical setback and buffer according to the code is 20 feet. Granted,most of the .'Woods' area, shown on the plan would have to be planted. There is screening in place already, however., for most of .the surrounding- homes. It should be noted that the trees, that the City of St. Paul would plant would be primarily .. p p y deciduous .trees due to the soil conditions. The applicant has stated that evergreens would not grow successfully on this. site, but they propose to plant evergreens where. the soil conditionsp ermit. The immediate neighborhood will also gain from this proposal b the establishment of a . P P Y neighborhood park within the soccer grounds. Trails and playground facilities would be a nice amenity for the neighbors to enjoy. Project" Schedule If the Maplewood City Council approved this proposal, the applicant would not be able to begin construction in the near, future. They must stili apply for and attain funding from a Ramsey County . grant program, develop detailed plans and negotiate an operational agreement with the St. Paul Regional water Services and the City of Maplewood. The applicant estimates that they Y ma not be playing soccer on the proposed fields until 2005 or 2006. The CUP ordinance states that the project must be substantially started within one year. This will not occur. Staff will be recommending that this deadline be extended to two years. Status of the Previous CUP and Ground Restoration Options The CUP for the lime lagoons expired on December 1, 2001. -The St. Paul Regional Water Services was required to landscape around the four southerly lagoons. They were not required by their CUP to restore the large northerly lime pit (the Location of the proposed soccer complex). The city code does require restoration,- however. Presently, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PQA) is requiring that the St. -Paul Regional Water Services propose a "closure plan" to restore the ground at Sandy Lake. This plan is being developed, but the St. Paul Regional Water Services and the PCA. are waiting to see what transpires with the soccer proposal. In any event, the ground would be filled and turf established. 4 Hazelwood Soccer Fields The. proposed soccer facility is comparable. in size to the Hazelwood Park soccer area. Hazelwood Park has seven .to nine soccer fields, depending on how soccer -field usa' a is confi ured' 9 9 (Sometimes fields are used as half -fields where two games are played. at the same time.)" ime. These fields are lighted, however, unlike the proposed Sandy Lake fields that would not be lit. Hazelwood Park. has 250 .parking spaces split. between parking lots. at the north and south ends of the site. te. . As a :way to gauge the impact of the proposed soccer ark we can coat are " " . p p �t with Hazelwood Park. According to -our parks office we occasionally receive complaints about overflowarkin and litter during large events. p g Traffic and Street impacts Chuck Ahl, the Maplewood City Engineer, reviewed this proposal and concluded that traffic impacts are minimal on. the roadway system's ability.to handle the increase in traffic. volume from this soccer park. .Dan Soler, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, stated that he does not feel eel that there would be any adverse traffic impact (see page 45). He recommends that the driveway into the site be. widened to 26-32 feet at the opening to County Road B for.easier access however. Mr. Soler also recommends that the applicant widen the road shoulder to provide a right -turn lane into the site. An access permit would be required from his office. Noise Impact Several. of the neighbors have. concerns about the .potential for noise from the proposed fields. Noise from the area soccer fields has not been a complaint in the past. Stafdoes not wish to imply that there have never been such complaints.' Noise from soccer games has not been a notable problem. Furthermore,. games would not take place after dark, so bedtime noise would not be a factor in the least. Citizen Comments I summarized the comments we received from our neighborhood survey on pages 10-11. Of the 190 surveys sent out, 74 persons mailed theirs back. Of the respondents, 15 were in favor, 50 were opposed, 3. -had no comment and 6 offered comments but took no firm position for or against. I have ,also enclosed a petition signed by 78 neighbors in opposition of this9 ro osal on pages p p p 46-52. This petition was .submitted in September 2001. Although there are many reasons noted by. the neighbors,. these are a summary of the most - frequently expressed comments: In Favor • It would be an improvement to the neighborhood. • It would be great to transform the lime pits into park or soccer fields. • It would be better than development. • There should be less soccer fields and add: ice-skating, bike aths, picnic facilities. J P 5 Ppp sed • This is St. Paul's. problem, not.Mapiewood's to. handle. • It would create much noise and generate too much- traffic.*. • It would create noise, litter and lighting nuisances. • These fields would be for tournament use—too. much activity. • Build a neighborhood park .instead. : : Miscellaneous Comments (neither for nor against} • Single dwelling or townhouse development is preferred. • Ok if it does not affect taxes or cause any assessments. • Preserve an area for general recreational use: horseshoes, picnics, pi ay ground. In response to the .suggestion for housing, this land is likely not suitable for development because of P the.deep .lime base. Police Department Comments Lieutenant Rabbett of the Maplewood. Police Department stated that this poses. pro'ect no si nificant i P g safety concern. He notes, however, that there could be noise complaints from the adjoining residents if games run late. Fire Marshal Comments Butch. Gervais, the Maplewood Fire. Marshal, had the following comments: • There must. not be parking in the entrance driveway. • There must be a minimum of 20 feet of access -road width for emergency vehicles. • The parking lot needs to be designed so that vehicles park in a manner to keep the drives clear for police and fire emergency vehicles to maneuver without any problems. Site Issues The applicant will develop grading, drainage, utility, erosion control, landscaping and building design . p gg n. 9 for the restroom. building if they receive approval of .the Land use plan change and CUP. City staff, the Capitol Region Watershed. District, Ramsey County and the Maplewood Community Design Review Board (CDRB) would review these plans. At this time, the site plan should be considered conceptual. since more detail is needed for a thorough review. If the council approves the plan change and CUP, the applicant should revise. the plans to show: • A detailed- landscape and tree buffer plan with quantities, sizes, species and locations. . • A detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plan. Storm water run-off calculations. • A site plan that provides setback dimensions, the location of trails, parking lot dimensions and the location of any fences (including material, height and color). • A trail connection to the corner of Adolphus Street and Skillman Avenue. • A right -turn lane into . the proposed site from County Road B. n • An area for"proof-of-parking" should the proposed 235 s aces be insufficient. P • "'No parking" signs along the main driveway. • A neighborhood park element. with features like a picnic area, tot. lot.' 9 , swing sets,, etc. • A paved bike path around the perimeter ofthe site. • The- driveway entrance widened' to 26--32 feet. • A gate at. the driveway entrance. Landscaping A detailed landscaping plan wi11 be. required if this project moves forward. Staff will be lookin . for substantial screening.and b g buffering for the homes on the north and south of the site. As mentioned, the applicant has stated that deciduous trees would be themost successful tree. top lana due to. the soil conditions. The city will encourage- evergreens to be planted where soil'types will allow them. Trail Connection to ' Skillman Avenue aAdolphus Street If the city council approves the CUP, staff recommends that thea applicant install a axed pP p bicycle/pedestrian trail from the site ,to the corner of Skillman Avenue and Adolphus Street. Such a trail would allow-convenient access to this park by nearby residents. An internal trail corridor should be designed that would provide access around the park, with a connection to Rosefawn Avenue for access to McCarron 's Lake to the west. Parkin ... . The proposed. 235 spaces may be enough, but we cannot determine. that with certainty. County ty Road 8 is not posted- for "no parking," and we should not allow on-street parking for this facility: Staff. recommends that revised plans show an area for "proof-of-parking" in case more spaces are needed. 'Summary The staff supports this proposal. From a land -use standpoint, the ro osal would provide an p p attractive, low -intensity. use for this barren,. unappealing land. If the city council were toapprove this- proposaf, the applicant must still provide detailed plans along with a management and use agreement for this complex. The. agreement should provide details relating to hours, security, policing and maintenance. COMMITTEE ACTIONS February 19, 2003: The planning commission reviewed this. proposal and recommended approval of the land use plan amendment'and the CUP. Refer to the minutes (separate attachment). 7 RECOMMENDATION A. Adopt the resolution on page 53 approving a comprehensive land use plan amendment from. OS (open space) to P (park) for the City of St. Paul's proposed Sandy Lake Soccer Complex. Approval is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed soccer complex would conform -with Maplewood's mission tocom rovide a -comprehensive, p p ensive, balanced and sustainable system of parks, open spaces/natural areas, trails and leisure -oriented activities/pro grams for city residents to use and enjoy'in as cost- effective manner as possible. 2: It would provide city. residents with parks and natural areas for recreational uses as visual/physical diversions from the hard surfacing of urban develo meat and as a means to p maintain the character, ambience, appearance and a. sense of open space. 3. It would maximize the- recreational opportunities available to city residents through the development of fair -and equitable working partnerships between the city and the local school district, adjacent cities, "county, churches and civic organizations: 4. It would provide city residents with .an interconnected trail system -for transportation and recreation purposes and as a means to tie divergent parks and open space to the broader community. 5.. It would convert an unattractive and unusable lime pit to an attractive and usable park. 6. It would provide relief for existing area soccer fields that are heavily used. 7: It would create and foster a cooperative working relationship with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County. 8.. It would serve. as a regional recreational facility that would serve many communities. B. Adopt the resolution on pages 54-56 .approving a conditional use permit for the Sand Lake Soccer y Complex. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. A. detailed site plan shall be submitted to the city for approval. All construction shall follow the approved site plan. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must -be substantially started within twoears of council a rovaI Y Pp . or the permit shall become null and void. 3. The city council shall review this permit in two years. If the applicant has not substantially started this project by that time, the city council may consider renewing this permit-. 4. The applicant shall submit detailed plans that include, but are not limited to, the following: • A detailed landscape and tree -buffer plan with quantities, sizes, species and locations. • A detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plan. 0 • Storm water run-off calculations. • A site plan that provides setback dimensions, the location of trails parking lot dime s' � p g . n ions and the location of any fences (including material, height and color). • A trail connection to the corner of Adolphus. Street and Skillman Avenue. • A right -turn lane into the proposed site from County Road B. • An area for "proof -of -parking" should the proposed 235 spaces be insufficient. • "No parking" signs along the main driveway. • A. neighborhood park element with features like a picnic area, tot lot, swing- sets etc. • A paved bike path .around the perimeter of the site. • The driveway entrance widened to 26-32 feet. : , A gate at the driveway entrance. .5., Site lighting shall not be allowed for night play. Staff may approve security'' li htin if it -.is pp lighting found to. be needed by the police chief for security reasons. 6. Park. maintenance shall be provided by the City of St.. Paula 7. Tournaments and scheduled events shall not bring .in outside vendors or merchandise without a permit from the city clerk. -in certain situations with multiple vendors, the city manager may require city council review and approval. .8. The City of St. Paul shall be' responsible for locking the. ate each evening. g 9. The applicant shall also submit a program identifying the hours of use, the teams or groups .. g p using this facility and their ages. They shall also .submit the management plan. for the facility as well as a plan for enforcement should there be any problems. _10. The City of Maplewood may require that the City of St. Paulrovide additional police staffing p p g and security at any events at the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex. 9 CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed 190 nearby and adjacent property owners for their opinion about the proposed soccer fields. Of the 74 replies, 1.5 were in favor, 50 were opposed, 3 -had no comment and .6 offered comments but took no firm position. Many comments were repeated and shared by -the' iY respondents. I have included a summary of the comments I received below and a sampling of the letters received on pages 28-44. The planning commission and city council willreceive copies of all of the. actual replies as a separate attachment. In Favor 1. It would be an improvement to the neighborhood. 2. There should be walk-in entry points, 3. The plantings should support wildlife and songbirds, plant under -story shrubs. 4. Would be. better than a foundry or business development in the back yard. 5. Suggestions: Fewer soccer fields; provide ice-skating rink; bike ' paths; park be open to others. 6. Need'. guarantee .of no outdoor lighting in the future. 7. Don't allow access to Adolphus or Jackson Streets. 8. Add a walking path, bike path ' and playground. .9. Wonderful. We would like a direct connection to our site. (Minnesota Waldorf School) 10: A great asset. (Tri District School) 11. An asset for the community. 12. It would be great to transform those lime pits into soccer fields. opposed 1.. This is St. Paul's problem, not Maplewood's to handle. Let them provide a park in their city. 2. The tree buffer will take forever to grow. 3. Adolphus Street can't handle any more traffic. 4. No! No! No! We don't want this. 5. Would create much noise and .traffic. 60There is too much traffic already. 7. Would create noise,. litter and lighting nuisances. 8. Make. it a wildlife preserve instead. 9. Leave it as green space. 10. We -voted to preserve open spaces in Maplewood by.raising taxes., How can you consider this? 1.1. We bought our home because of the . open space. 12. Convert this area ' to a small park or a swamp. 13. We'do not need this and the trouble it will bring. 14. This would cost Maplewood money because of police and fire service. Keep costs down in these tight budget times. 15. Stop the politics and start listening to the taxpayers. 6. 1 am retired now and don't need the noise, lights and traffic. 17. This would increase the- potential for adolescents hanging around -drugs, alcohol, vandalism. 18. What is it you folks don't understand about the word NUJ? 19. This was turned down once. Why are we doing this again? 20. These fields would be for tournament use causing too much traffic, noise and activity. 21. 150 to 200 parking spaces is outrageous. We'll fight this. tooth and nail. 22:. This land is like quicksand: It will keep caving in. 10 23. Build baseball fields instead: 2.4-. Make it a children's park, 25. Will hurt our property values. 26. Why can't the. Maplewood area be for Maplewood rather -than serving St. Paul's. needs.' 27. Our neighborhood is quiet now. Comments from those neither. "for" nor "opposed"'o .the golf course \ 1: Ok if there would be no assessments and people. aren't allowed to park in the street. 2.. Single-family homes or town houses are preferred. 3. .•Preference: a fence around the entire site; no access to Skillman Avenue; plant mature. trees. .4. Preserve the area of one of the fields_ for things like a picnic shelter, playground, horseshoes' and basketball: 5. How could you access the area. without having to drive? 6. Owner -occupied town homes are preferred. 7. Will this raise our taxes? 8. Don't allow a traffic connection to Adolphus Street. 9. Never allow lights. 10.. This .park would need policing to prevent the use of the parking lots at night. 11. Add an entrance to the park at Adolphus street to take the burden -off of County Road B. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 40 acres (approximately)-, Existing land. use: Undeveloped and previously used as a dime -storage area for the St. Paul Water utility SURROUNDING. LAND USES North: Single. dwellings and County Road B South: Single Dwellings East, Undeveloped open space and the- St. Paul Business Center We* st West: .The Soo Line Railroad, the. Minnesota Waldorf School and the- Tri -District School PLANNING Land Use Plan designations': 'existing: (open QS s ace), • ro osed: P(park)gp proposed:. Zoning: F. (farm residential) CODE REQUIREMENTS Section 36-437(1). of the city code requires a conditional use permit for any public service or public building use. Findings for CUP Approval Section 36-442(a) requires that the city council' base approval of a CUP on nine findings. Refer to the findings for approval in the. resolution on pages 54-56. Findings for Amendment of the Land Use Plan There- are no specific findings for approval required. The parks section of the pian, however, gives a list of goals the city strives for in the development of parks and trails. These are listed on page 3 of this report, APPLICATION DATE These applications were accepted in complete form on January 23, 2003. State law requires that the city decide on these requests within 60 days. The city council must act on these requests by March 24, 2003. 12 p:sec181soccerfields.doc Attachments: 1 Location Map 2. Address Map 3. Land Use Plan Map 4. Site Plan 5. Conditional. Use Permit and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Narrative dated, November 20, 2002 6. Additional Sandy Lake Soccer. Complex Narrative dated January 13, 2003 7. Letter from Bob Bierschied dated February 28, 2003 8. Memo from Bruce Anderson.dated March 3., 2003 .9. Memo from Bruce Anderson dated February 5, 2003 10. Letter. from Joseph Plumbo - 11. Letter from Robert G. Lunzer 12. Letter. from Mike and Kelly Thompson 13. Letter from JoAnn Ronning 14. Letter from Jahn Hackman 1.5. Letter from. John and Rose Strantz .,16. Letter from John W. Chapman 17. Letter from Dan Soler, Ramsey County Traffic Engineer 18. Petition of those opposed to the proposal 19... Land Use Plan Change Resolution 20. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 21. Complete packet of Citizen Comments (separate attachment) 22. Parks Commission Background Data (separate attachment) 23. Colored Site. Plan (separate attachment) 13 Attachment.1 b DR. LITTLE CANADA LARD AVE. N . w v VIKING DR. w 60; 35E. � o � 5 , o ' . .� L�+U IE RD. a w. Q ; LAURIE CT, 49 0 25 cn v� }... J� rn ¢ w (25) C NTS' RD: RKE Q �'j Mvplecrast su AVE. pork -CLE RIDGE �R AV E. ELDRI DGE AVE. Sandy= In s., ' .La ..::�==:===:= in' a B LMONT LN. 58 Oehrline . BELMONT 1 ke_ cn Lake 11 r55) IKILLMAN AVE. J� SKILLMA;N AV. NEW .00D Q� SKILLMAN AVE., N �n Y z ` -1 F rn n cr �" LI•I. < )16`�/ z MT. VERNON AVE. rL 0 9 Y DOWNS AVE. a UJ MT. ¢ VERNON. AVE, Edg' ertoi� w z w' C _1 ! . Q p Por�Qwrt Park Q W Lx j . 1. Q ROSEIAWN AVE. W 7" . BE LWOOD AVE. BELLWOOD EL ql! �7 o ► > v) (n SUM O SUMMER AVE. r- m w MER w cn LJ SUMM Lit. a cr cr CT. w U z (n w d FENTONI AVE. a wester, w YIL z o HNIs RIPLEY (n _ g ¢ Y _ V) AVE. En 13 Y CD '��? �-- � GAT AY r RIPLEY AVE. x �. cn cn in t— _ w a 11 KINGSTON o AV. w a� Z c7 m 27 �. �-- KINGSTONZAVE. C _, :F Q D��G a w w w' Z m ©' PRICE SAVE. 30 Q m Q w `� a 30. . LARPE NTEUR AVE. rNNW Attachment 2' COUNTY ROAD -B E 30 70 12G .130 140 15 160 010 PROPOSED SOCCER FIELD SITE. i rn; 91 99 105111 117 125 133.141 147 155 161 167 175 m 201.1. SKILLMAN. AVE E m 2005 N o. -102 108 114 1221 130 .138 144 150 156 162 1701 i 192 N 2Q08 1999 c ..7 1181 0 2000 1991 c.. 1992 198 10 10 11 123 131 13711 151, 15 163 171 177 189 193 > 1984 i O 187 MOUNT VERNON, AVE E 1978 Z 1021-1081116 122 132 138 144 150 156 16 170 176 184 192 r in - n:1969 'f 1969 --4C 1970 Z _ CD .1961 CA 1962 1955 1 0 131 Z 1956 DOWNS AVE E 1948 19 120 128 134 142 15 15 16. 17 17 18 19 943 1112 940 1942 934 93 1930 81 87 113 121 129 135 143 151 157 163.171 177185 193 928 ROSELAWN AVE E 42 ' S0 64 ' 70 ' 78 86 94 _ 106 ,112 120 128 -134. 1421150 1561162 170 176 84 192 200 206 21 cp 1912 ,Y . ' �, ` ,n t 1' p ;: t- � � .? r ,, r• ,r ,% Y^ h i 1 �. � x �7 (F"\ yt i :,.7y '4't•?i .,loll 4; 1. nl k' f'N �, y.�. f ii t ?_ ,IJ t r t 1¢ N I C"i ,,s r ,"' 0 1 ' .t ``h-k�,', J E ,].. 1 r F -a r 7qw. - - "Y .,, i t•: .�j• �. j��rhy���rT 1 M. 4 • j. _r Siril_'t } "i 'ir�`J4 ,4 2iI-ice Y' ,1€� '•9 ;`� - V-.' `,fir I r ? r+ N 2 ' ' _' G-+ tis . ! y,,y I;"r,�, -AL" �����.,,.­I� t. ::::.f._..-.:_,_______-P �1'i, , _., .���6__-_.��q r-,,-- ,- , ..--,; ,, a� ?ix �,- , �P 1 1 .0' t_ yen���i �-, tf •F-tr .yo.•, 7. y `� n.':. 'y�� _�. d: r� s, 'S'•-,, ,_ .ter-! ,k _ f ; 1 41r yY .-"*,`-,--A- ..., % ;11 .�X \ .., IJ .ti ;• w ,• ],y • rr ky 0r ,Ir ai rj): ft A ulxs Y� .11 � 1 `fit -7,; 1N 1. �-71 �Irll+f Y• ,t 9 . } �,v.« 4 wr •'fi,�„ :lit r a1 , '� f �"..T�er:.-• ;'"-r. .;ll11 I ,y,,���••# .rJyl:r••J+l. ,f �: 1ft ...tyfw� +,Y-''.'a�:r- r:p 'J' I I -'i rr0. '�' r? 1 �J. ,.ra--� .0, •! ,!5i�."r ��� Wit' ;ai'-' [ 1. r.. 4' f_F T i- .b: t -•-^^: '�-•n•---F:.r^ ''t" ~". r <' r - " i'- t' •:tNX• 4e+.i.".,� r _'tT.'='x'T'""r._;'c�'r'T'!-'r�;T ,'. Y: t .. �,��. -`t.: �,^�b\"- �.v.. :1 -i.r 'i .sU� ••:� _ .'tiM•:i :rI �Y'•s4�!!�j., ii.'.} r _ ; - .'i.. !Pf."-. r: :2.�„-r� '. t.• I cw.. 7 F { .� •a • ,.) .aya. , J :'r .1f a I, � C:�`s�•r. .� �t J ; i_ e,, .,: �_: -"v�7 'L`a- r t,- !"■ i'.i... -- "n r "`u_=L•r•.;1 f �!"=,• ••fir" t ` a.'�., •a •r'� I r .t It,N���:,. f ._...r �y� �y�tY-`N:''` k�."••'ra.(TL xj;r.0..�JC_:�.W'%7-� T4,ly"......:� .{: 1 f 7..�,,, •P i rl\ I r' �: 7 jtiFtR �t 'J �� , '^"►7!M_-- = - ici, 't /h;; l� i� .r. X,- a - �� c'r :�?14�, !t.'• ;'r7't?(•! • 1 1 I .+ , ' •jt 1- 4 _ !. •-p :L,t!. .t •ty r .}�� , n y' 1-14 .' - :,s':t'iir/st� ! ' ' fi _a 4'".'`�•,'•": 1':' - '; i:,cn''' `;.'4th. ..sr•.?� yr..>< ...-s� --: �' _c u , a ..t r-w'�. 3 , t t ..a- �. _ ...;h' r r W� 4jk� {. _ ', $ i r" R;:� r .s:- i'++`ro : �cr. F1. I7i•-�•� ��,,,,�c.• r -„c `t x 1'"*1 `'^^+{�( 1 if R tr :�- o. ! .t .�1•'�. * 'rx.,. t,,, n',; 4q , t"r'1:y R� :.1'*. - , 0 _ _ u, ,t~Zt�, -<r) .'l j ;2 !"'+ yh. ! �'� f �. 'k' 'y ll _ -li„ '�•;:�^'2 :7: .r-,.'�•�t r4f ` � � :+ '4 .., [ - •4'. f1,2F -0 ,Z- " - 1 n :�,Tq�'1' °°r�t,.t I y ,j i .f�'.:rr�`�""� °i +�7k_~ .. - .� :r t Y4 .1 rta•� - " �Wt +o � !''�) 'triT N'y • `k`�� , = - I i - 1 ' L r :�.' '-'situ' : t r Y -1 r . J __ 11 7 � 4 r �;.g±i +,✓t`.,4f'4„'kliA�r r r"r. , at. ".' �.. twc�_ 'I� _. ':.-..,- {;, v t"` - t S -•a.." H . ••e• -e _ __._. .:^• : r.1v c \ ...i?_.._. -.-�t i.@.°L"'9" �' its. i,•� �1Bt{.�, �.. , irp .r,n I I s:� :4::.n,i x •1r r[�';..•.Y�''.. k.:'.' '11 art" u.Lv_�tat+" Y` �_ -1 I 11 r. ,•K" t :� •.t:•��' ;►�F7c`•i--^.;� '1[`-i._ _ ' l.s�V%:.7yn ,;/'+eta' v r ��,`t�+� '\ -.,., -t,' !wi'.c.. , _ Y -5 -. Ti����` -J••' i+[�I i 1 }, ° .� ' i -k'r-a - I "�' _ y�QQ.■ .q x. °t'W <,t. V;arJy,a ;.�. .t - s ; 'att ..Ci^ a. a.^ ::a•:_ _ h. •,++R7.'; r �-'?+ /.�.; 7 .L. �.j„ i ,r.F ..:o , '{ .•�• - rtri� - ■ )4jrE'. ' r--'.•4: ,_ h-,?L•..r�t •�` ..6:•: .:.31`_t'-:T.',c=4ti_; °�`ti+,-•:itir .r:Y: ' al ` ,;'V!.'•`„"'• �.,w,r. ,' �,••i ""..: x.i�: ,,".•.C,y `:.t.• 1 "w Y a ,,�. •r+ •"1- t ' .j • 1. Jc• > Y „i:17. �" I .:�. .1•a alE+. ?t�:i+ a ✓ �'ti..\TiL.'tq' i.±".•' '�'""zro'_: t!;n•c�i: �xlQ r.l.,t_ -v`� uY'4- ' _<4ty� _ r -W . :w .7' .�:. _ ... 'L `'' � _ ��a_:•_ __ . _ :t•. � r --_ _ "r-�.....Y�.__ - - r_�a-z�..a.-__t._� .�: yP•� .1 �i ",c t ;I( •:-1 ■" :` - f� I. fir.: �•-...__:i 1rr•',t-- .��h'aiYi -- '.'-t..-1 �-- `.•fir,'•-'_•e:l�•..` r; gar: v4 �,I- ��.. 1I II,'µ .S y.f,:. t. -.:i tI v'I vta 7•f�l�..t•--:r•,• 1. .,��•^^ .�\.,. -.-c• .�-f' /--�%:'.. ,/..� •E _ •�:).r (� v I ,�.. Faro „ ! J . f � ! - _ v .¢.a.i.:,� i ,.> _j (,�_; e' : 1 `1 :a.e, ,j \ �u. "_4 ' t. Vit. ..��\T.. -�.I I- .. .cif-•, - --�a ,J, _I. ' y ,lo: ,,,I '_It . L. •. �I. ,rl- �qD. �? .� - r`'' .. l I r _� rte.,. - ! y,-. I . ;j� ` I l l: i o. .•T v r 7) �.r_� r - fit . l .,;-. v I\ It .. -•:d>� �. to ' t .� Is:��Ei. J �? :3+ .Y^ - l� -� .\ .Il -' j I 1 ..�g--• T -.n t_..:..'zrt _, - .c-,,: c I rn t' \ 1. \ ` nr �I (II IIF nh+' - , �f hZ' �t t :-F3`:•et ti,i < �` ' , it L t .,Jc -1 1 k r i'• l �' o hav: �3J+ 4�r•; y .S.i- " ji,1 . I• .. +- i,�q - 1 •,lr IfF� ):; ^' a� 1.1. l� T 3 rPV1 )1 • \ �I',r]�tr IIgJF• ,`! ' Ii!u It1.i ,-Cl,4.( V. '-r,-'<,._ a c •� 12, ycrC; t :.r .. i. .w - .,1-T , N { � � - fatk ,j _ �+ it:, -, iM1 � r• •;i' { %: .t` {' _ I ia't t N..t,�: rat, :• .,,.tj ,. j ..a; ., ,i:i.' QI• - Y+�� ;� . It. ,.l Y 1, •:Y -1� • yT v `� t •t, 'M - H RT) t\'Y� art .J.�-• ,.i.r;•' f.YY,f. �a f J #I. Iw �� ..ri ■ :i(•-' +'z �r -.I�t' ��=r<i` ^,�•"`-�.tx-', t'` l.. tl _ ,�, l - �•. n .r. - _'r. _. :54.16; { :ir9t -4q (,.. ,.7M :t.t,^�I'irh; J_.:.. `14'_ ijyy �.. ',� ttr'J•:1=:•4 • .f .:1' �• -r. - ". d I�r�: �• ..1. .i-.'�l H'!.I. I,1..� 1. ,•-r+2 � _ ` '{ 1.1 'i ,i!.A, rp'■�p.aryf�r�' .1, +� L. •.I. .3• -; 1.•.'rt �-4f,t ■ -_sir- t\.• ..11r.r _ . f .�, L I ..: T,, j % ` ,✓ ,... Ir .i.'v �:,.: I 1. '1..:• r i r 'r aT t -/. ;/_. µ �}. ! 1 _�+ `. c �.:luI[�","?+ •1-_.r ' C. ac \ i:. ,. I S ' , I ; H : r� yyq `C c %. J w�_Sd1 t .• -, '�,'.4. k k. �� `rK v • } j '`. " .7W af• t;.i ��j;. "1 ' :iI,� t (tTt .Z', t..�. f :. Cai t' i jk^.i. ' 'j�r1 _ y �, SS .1:a,: \ ,A f Jii h � `a '� � ,1,`^ iL:L _ ..ltl._u. :�i ,'1r' 1 iL.j_.': 1- �.• [ , 5'' 1 of I is- - - t,i .1jy,, ;� '13 -1 t.:. r<.. t..v.eb ■ - :tF„o 4 C- ,- Ir: , -tea-F f'.!I., c: �.t �. 't:3: •.�•. `, i -.r tiY. -r- *,._ c,, :.,{�. .r;�', 31j.. _:�'tlr{ ,4t �''; G..7�.'r�'9"•t. O`. ll \,�� 1. -Sc f :I. I-f'i.!b' .-1 1' rt''pi�- ':.;-, - - - � rt r,•ri ' .�' . �. ''t�3 r,? t.�l. I l r.. t � : 114;,. l l t,� , .Y' I 7Y _ :,E 1 '.,; • R .f' ;tom : .1. _ r. l , f•p,� PlIrr - J ait F o� 1� F r d t •: t' _ F `' n ,. r'' .I 'v � tot ~I ` `\�t•.t': 1�.- I �.-_�-.._..r. d:iD`' -0 Fl illi. iG:�_�I''"�fl,-•,,. �rti tM : t ��, j _rte .._ -" i C t_ ' ,�! __ 1'�` .;; �.t+'�' 1 (.:. ::'a it �• {.- - r'\' 'sw�.W'Ll 'h til' {{ l?'.. ^+ 1-I'Y^• C t `� .;• •f+._t :� .?c�+t_ - �'�.7 ,` fir- .,�I,r _a. .la i _:.i;�.�. �± it _ - - - _ SS _ _ - W -- -1. _ '..'.+IC` :. - •7 F.. i:,:1• _r'rS' i t [0t .� ` �C-it!y ^i,'%.- a�; - t h \ T 1 `r lf:tl y . �, , j t'., ,{?J o. �+ is I . r_ 4 .' �� r;� Ih J K-jr, i ,a �iV n�y 6�,�1.3, h:ct 9 'I t� i _ ` ,a. -.., S - ti i'. tet` t h .tIS'j(e .'. •r 5'rJr. � Y I'. WM r .J :v� .ti.� ,?_�'•Jt. - '' r i'� r _ '7. I ,l;f?�t yA, • !11J i�1 11 I,,;•tt\Iaa \ i i II'ti ,, .IY 1Ia...,,, a n^17et t� i 111 ,'' l \'© , ,r. , 1 �. lrl J ;- Via. . F-1 , • ., �::":.,E.. _ "� tom'- Ir:l, i �',- ,,�; ,` �'. ;+ ; 'r ` 4i ~r _ -Ir- It �• 'z,r ,,,;, �r.F��t•r1 F ,ry e J *; Yd i71�,tF V'F i� f. y, - drat'` '+: a. _. 'f, - ti' 1. -. ,. 11' r"'- �r !1 jy-�1}}]tI •i:. 1. l'`7� ., yt a •'lna 4.. 1•FF�{ - i 1 L tf. J� 1 1:• 'f•(t,:,l'1 1 ~s 1 T' I •ter#'Fal I L'-',�. �:'�Y,� Fyls, �t,^�t7 t ` Y . 1•' z' w "^ �li y a g �i u� �I1. . I'Lr •I.1�:`ir.3t!'; 5.'? -. '�t..•%:B�Mzlll `:.1 tom. �t •t' \l '�+' �:, I. 1�,, n r :..Ir •` `��`,itl 41� I'.;li=�3® x tr �� ) _ - _ ri t,ii" ��_�s- F�z;r.t;1 L,, ,�W��`...1L� 1•"ty7�iy- .•3�v � 4t � ►�yM( ... . _ . , t Y, it"�l ��rV�. 1R.�Dtl .:l,t r �I v '•ir pL��r ':��Miti�_M- W ,�1 -\ 0! _`•' J ;"1" rt 1 rt•", rIl `]!y.4E� i'�• 'J- tl�r.,--,•.T(�- - z it 1.� w • `y, lar. •v �'I r,. '.�l'3•I.tI _ �]je ' .•..ail i,( •;1r...i:..L..: w � 'y.; -.} .a'j rt`??-`" '-.. 0 ` `\-' Ifl,,, - - ••i:I• _ _ f.. I t a- �C` t f �ptCt[X ,.1. ■�. j.t ��� r•tc�rv-! S• , -2 Y :•�t: I ;':t, i� .__ ,-74M + _ 11D_ v S - I� -:�ri �M,W� '�4 ;d��� ��,� !,�FY�4"r•Y•,�7�`�,•_..,a� e E �: t'r l �: .rt :�',�."�?•:> :� r~ fi \et' r''. •l• `' II - Y" `, �.,a. - h : 111k" 4 _ .�1_ .',J ,.��F•"•i.�Yar�_' 0.""^ -•_Ia, ,: �.:..I - xi�1:- •t :''� .r{ra', ,. .L. YI -Y� 3. .-, - � r -r i ,r p I.`C'�'1', i�.+` . �•�c,k'��•"s,,,._L�s-'r �Si .I� yi L : •e:• ^'rtl . j >:-^ v.� ), „t 7'�Si 1 r '4 tV r _ G=':t �� -1. i, "� V'. -:.jt �+ �I� t1- �A ,+ Y: LMu t1r�„ 7 :a ." <. ' r c\ l � Imo,!' �, `a" til.-' f ° C}l,t • 165' :If lrf:l. a {{ ijl• •1 .. -.,( ',d,„ t `i 1:-. - "� `=�:: r. �:�. Q' 114�ii''n' 1I 'r"--`' ^Ld `i �e r ° �.!�' C a ,,5_ alp fit• =1� r ';1 {tl� :� 'i 1 '?SSL n't _+„�i ;'7 -t t C: v Oa -",.L r jr' 4 µ fx • r_ _ � .`.' c t. ~_(J\: �j E }dl. +'.c L' `j�l Jft. -r,., L l V� t�C, _._ .mt{ - •L+.t _r: 1 - - r I YI 1.� F •SI •` L- h. t �!] .s t. i `�.=�+y ,� k ^!' lsay s tt .r_ ' r' � I -;{•�i - `' +, .1 p�r 't •�'t r ?-! J r r �r _t-_ _ 1. 1, lia, t � rt , � l au:1 ';f,' i t °.1 i ,.s S.i1_� "' 1 :a i � ' - t .1 -'t^� y� . 'YY�a-. '-}I��;.r, i I.- 1 ` r1 \r �' _ "I 1't++L< ;:�t: 9 � G ;;�i_r.. �:lL] E��31, I�ir•:2.: rr. `,'_'t... ate., •^c, j.'1z .!-y;�•.-+.S:Ly,hcx4;1•. �'1. ,.\: ` Tr } �- t, -'rt: ':_� ?t'19'^��'.,�.Tie''�-l: l'1 'T',-.. ._•ri�.l-'I�•q' •r3 : z � It ::Fr k :_f l Cti7„ y �w a f a. '` i i Y }- `c J 1_ I r ;,-`a�_ 7 r� p' ?r �:G7f�r'�. t s "a��yy 9 .t' °+\ r a, t ^'n t Iii' ,:� t lent' M i J. J v. �i +ii°_:. -yr..yf ....„ J1 i„'F'}2- �lJ,tc�i;�.,i.`.1ny ' a . S� l ., h moi.. y-_�'1l{ �` ID i.. ;'}.•'i .'$�;i^t•r-r�o,--t'�•._� ttr. t-r� at•` :.yam l 1 iw _ _i`�i ..bi',^.1-rrt __f' i '■$ u,r •.1� r .rr4i'�, -Y` "iL11 .Jct v �r•`� y`, 'S ♦ t -•f'i i.t r� - -p. ,..` .=.,1 t_ {. a�n1 n T • . rh'' ti '•� , , �' t . t { 1 , \ _r _• I r ���'''''' �- , i �.. Y'> i a. r � ' �,% U _ °tax* "rz ` i< .- u b -; �t ? I C kfi , Qi ; N} t� 7cr: 0 7r.'J. n'A ryn •r tr' `+•'9*' .:a t r I• _ 1 _ t j��S' F t Ey'+.T�' • t:>'`.'.•�:_`{- �-e..5•`'t+- .S --L' .``-�•r e �t�ay�,t 1 -- �rL__. ._ _ - •,- Cs j iL�{ �� liria_ .,i _' I' 4- TlW [ ,�'v/rnrT 1 i` '1 1 _ 1-('J.Lt_- ,._� 1 t s....z :r� F. . i:>• � �''''`�.v....S`+' 3^ ;a, .. "'� .'' \.: '" �, .,.,. •+ "\fE.'`.:�"� Yl- r' fl,� 'z. � : c•.� .,�- � L.: :•� ti ,, -r��=' .• ',. y i �y :1;_ii :a.r�y;�x d '•`�• r% - �' J` ,. iSy,Il�.rr3FT.F: u cirL�i�E �- �a.,l �r ,'Y :.o .�.` y`. •✓'x- - -4�-, :i,t a n. h r. r . �'.r(,ae�.�,tJV , 6. -X l'. ,,• t �I r �.` t:• '.1 _=�� Lf i a /! ym :.ri y',*ti ,xi " '•�%'r ,.. 2 l .,!?�•,,,. 'v r ,40 _ '1. at..• 1.r _ �rti �,lrt •"r. 4aj 4 ::i.l`�!�..._.., _ {-,•�1.. ::tv L {y: \ 1 a, •� \\ - f :, _ t 1 ' `I !t. �. �. ..,1 v.tt. �� - a 1z, 1 i'•` Tr ..:; __. •sCr+rv.4 •tr.r�. .an - _ �.-. ,. _ , Tom} �'/ \N+'^ .IIi>.. _ -_,wc. .`"t T -y _'4 ,'�C. F _i -.�I •F ��• �' �. 1 Y'c' 1 J)•.7"� - 1�(� -``+ `•y��•���''��•�6^i I• ,F•.. --1 f' C. S G^ ,.0 v, �. = _ `-tl;. `�=c �-.� :_ _ \ Y - ;. 'I. j ; I '." �'.?i)', a r" 7 IYt'-'-• I Cczi,_ JT F;�.:fl7•' ';1 n., r - i`ai•: \ _ . F, ,.. ,�. �-, ! J.. :, . ra -1j a '_I� (,. �h'' rt+ �r Stt-� \.. '•,\`Y 7i . 9' r ` _ - { �. • "� ` �i:: "� sl. , �i, I i u tba..(J 'rW ;rY-sJ - •a .: '\ i� 'tea�MWIWf '''tea '-�.` .'� �, T,; f✓ j t 1 ;�:ll. �l Lam_ qy;IZIL" �y tiC '3� t. } �-• r� L j _: a� t �-. � . I . r ". '- "'-�`r �17,; _ " , � w. tr+: s -a �` l� 4I.- � --.I"-- ...-. . . . .-,... �_t rr ^.- m+.>-'_7�•"�^..R'^T-,+•-r��.•. I ( [' t,� t, i • ti�, i tg,tc s Xyy�, '*� tt••' '.''`l..I.�TirIS , r`'_ .�....'I , . F , ., : w i ` P' t r - ` �. : � 1. .. . %. .-_'_ , .1 , 11 I n '3° G zt ,- . li - f. -(1 .,o�n1'�'f11�.1a 9(�`t�', , ,* j' T �':. . 1. . . .- .,- - Jr. ­­ ". Y , .-Tt; ; Zf, '1• Y,+ '! h, t.rl1`. c J t ••' I %: %, ',�% • � I . , ~ y .-rJ'.. ka.�� X _o ,. � ,-, I I -% . � -/ W..". ltof�l �- W11 4. xrl�tI.'1 I"' e n z `{'Y -r y-4''rAa +t;�p'�'�'.i l •/\O� r`� ��.,r tS _ r a , �j•L2 • 1 ' •t + ti --'C'," moi. ��I,Y{y'� " �'''�'i '�'rh .✓".t" i f :I�^23a•1. . . .4( �yr a-' s, r T!',,,p5',rttN.yN.a.X.t,`1eP:t'7.�` r ' „{• toi . rl ,..:...' `�?.:. rn�•s'_1Ch r •.t' .T F- _ 4. %_ a fi7 !t t�' Y^ - •�.7°" a _ ....N:ai'r't.�.ep .:I _ a .:`.it;��������������� I - I ri. i r ' t! Ir .y-+1. .I-, q n r ''3wti , yF :. py'1 c rY:•Dj}t,- 1. •c J's:• �Pa„y' v 1tj� : F r pa's fl K---,.7 '� ,.�,•µ:,� •�� ,.ter.- p,. t •rJ'.•c ,'rl R"•.' f•'l�;,t. '_ „•„ �-!' 7 . t _:`" .14 • e.�trAi;: . : _ .r, .jt•C•Y g t 'f \ 1 ,c, ri *AvV ,`~i t t. . _ A Y, sh,- - t' J fl 'n%i ` tia0.,oC`�.JQ Sa-',7• • I vx (J'w: J '•7 +8`s t� i "_ �•'!.� 4;'r' „i SR Y}-LA.y'�- l tZl 1 S ll �I�.. iii AVllj_T'•r�_..1.'' } "T �F I rvy"�`:of.'6-..,-�.'.,?�is•'G^°j��r.<i. {-:ir,TL.�wto ..dr..rr 7�u Y `r/„•I`'<•' ;•t",'! iur�e r ,-yet-_-w•Lv . r _`F a.'r�C a t-wr' �"�® .:; 1 .'i,kq� Jla a ; %t. y `4f+ .1'�r�i-! .r. - t t > 1 r r .i �- l 6 `" `i1 T`4itYr. Z< y.,.4 � '.. ( j W',''' a.iaf: I ` i', ;.vJ• '$ l.:l ;,•'?S•J - '.rt ��l�. .; Y ..� t' -lf rb,r._r. i¢rL 4+a ;, Y".c7 .tirfl x4 r�`..1'&'„�'• ! 1l-ilyMley l;l i ey :: T'?f . -[ -i'r+F;.. _ i i"..Y rT .%: `kafr �-r N>a •_.•l. ;_. Y I i'11•v t J41 iAK,,U�.:'xy • �eor'. e wr "..•t N s +, 1 �- s .t. �:k; �.t �. s•. ;`I _ T Y - \ - J c,.--�1:. ' : ;p. 'f �,.'t`,��..ti, r .+_ t j �`i �-" r e'!•.i '.�'g� ,1 .:e"r1't.r- '{ �. i .,,�% . „1-}- �,I iii. as", - :Xyy 'Ja: vCi-+'L`i' .Iyr ,r.. y�:.1 �, +rN: y r i•��L' I_ Y-"7:,., s ''S• - 4` xY a, t lt,, +'t^F:'. J 1 �, Z '�'r . + _-` r%t' x� ij#SS''- b In -- f �t ~ S ; I y j(jl�� Kti: r i' ]n p r '. r6. �'•' j • #� ,-, i .r•, ,,-yat:.• r '� Int � �, r q rty x 1. tk., � c��•37� =Yg, ":Tj r- . °�rt;�a�a } -• I�'ts � iy �r ,� 'Ai'•Y • 'yr r, `t 1 �, ." �}t r•„ y rfp�r� k Il' -3 Y R '' ). :.r {r 2.�1 .� EKi •ft..,i?-ff 1:. a '�,trc,-':1<r+ .,,:<�l?'b�.,.a\: Z'::f "f 'ra .•z. ...i';k-t,r. ' ^' ?''`,�Sv. �1 .•'rk„ r "?!- _, . � � ,�,:,,,vtis,._ •a..U.r .jr., 4•...,,: rte ,,n om:;.: 'fi•-..c . y':;y I.t t :i r �, `e t ",`r. :q; Yom?'• -r - t.Y ,, r:'= - 1 'fl' may, >4- �• ••''S{ . r r .,il�!k"� . r ir1 1:.:- ci. Glp;_ . l .� nl\ ,, MARL-_:; �� •91 l u: F-.: �. `' f yis 8 ii as: y srz4�T.�w«#• 3k : c 1 yr n, >J' r . Y� �ti r* a �1._... ,: y r \' r y� �r f s. ^ Av" . ?iv;_ ..w f .. ,t _. _ '•v,_.i•'r'..�-3` .iT Ait {' , f� " t { a , yu < KSs n`•I y •! K'° :: _ ••. \ ; R r�.J- f yt a.>S �'` .ice y, t�jlti,. e' Lf} �,o. t, s,t 7.1;.`,t1 = ylr'r" -.,_' -� ' r_ Ld.�3_A�fl?.�Cc`tJ;' . S;"�': t7?�A��^.- �1��- M ? Zv l.� J3��'•�7t 1 - I I 'v r a `� •° ' -a: �'* ' �.,z ��7,spa 1 i t ts9 �tia r .� - y., : • � c � y J �tjy ,. v :{. 7' , 1 tt_a) _ ?R- y .1 '. _<,i �L•r,��',.?1- Y xvi•. -�, w a �' `a rt'; 4'�! L i' , ff r N I�}M>.�Y," �'a rl AJO....iriril 't "'/y�1 �. �, `ir. ' 1 14 'IrL ! ^'+ x!1.1 y •p r'.l!'•G•J t. : • --.oa'14 '' _ ''rel , " . i a qIIIII c nL- , in Attachment 5 R•'C t 1D., Vj 7003A November 20, 2002 CONDITIONAL USE OR PUD APPLICATION . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.. AMEN D : MENT APPLLCATION For: City of Maplewood 1830 County Road -B East Maplewood, MN 55109 Intended Use: The intended use for thisro- r p peY w111 provide park space and soccer facilities. This developmentWill help alleviate the strain of overuse that is put on other soccer facilities in the area. The development will include soccer fields arkin parking draina,,e ponds, and a rest room ofacility.. There will be a -significant buffer of wooded space. • p e. between the residential nelghborhoo►d and the soccer fields so the residential area will b � positively e positively affected by the development. The use would change the character of the surroundin area b el' ' g y � m � n acing an industrn al. land use and replacing It with an ample mount of woods, open. space,. and recreation space. Property values' ,will also benefit .by being located close to a large ex • g parse of woods and open space that is desirable within urban and suburban settings. 18 Attachment 6 DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION CHY OF S PAUL Randy C. Kelly'. Mayor 3 00 City Hall Annex' Telephone: 651-266-6400 25 West Fourth Street Facsimile: 651-292-7405 Saint Paul, Minnesota. 55102 TTY: 651-266-6378 www.ci-stpaul.Tm.us/dept/parks January 13, 2003 To. Tom Ekstrand 2003 JAN i City of Maplewood Office of Community Develo menu . p 1830 East County Rd. B Maplewood,. Mn. 55109 _ From: Kathleen W. Ang to Re: Sandy Lake Soccer Field Proposal al Tom,. here is the. additional information you requested conditional y q sted for .our conditional us ep ernut and land. use plan change requests in the fax transmittal we received on December 12, 2002. l . . Parking: The prop osed number of p P Aparking spaces was deterr=* ed by the average number of people per team: 11 active players/team +4 Players on the bench p y h + 2 coaches + 1 referee _ + 30 (2 -spectator s/player 48 people/team. 48 x 2 teams/field = 96 96 x 6- fields- = 576 peole . total p Based on city zoning codes for outdoor recreationfacilities- in St. Paul, MN, Canton, MI ...and Santa Monica, CA, there should be 1 space for every.3-4 people at the facility. ty. This equals 144-192 spaces. There is also additional parking to accommodate 20° ,. J p g /o more people during peak usage, and the transition of people. fromme being played tone bao the next, for a total of 235 parking spaces. B. S cr eenm o : As part -of the construction drawin a b packabe for this project, we . would include a detailed - lantin Plan and details: The p g p large areas of planting will be mostly lime tolerants species, articular) from' p , particularly the Maple -Basswood . Forest community. Where there is adequate f ll we will also lso plant evergreens. AA -.ADA -EEO Employer 19 C. Lighting: Not included in project'... . R Phases of Construction: The entire project is anticipated to be completed in two phases. The. first phase includes filling the site . which is curren ' be tly ing done by the Board of water}Commissioners. The Ci of St. ' ty Paul will complete the first phase with final grading, installation of the acces - • s road, parksng, drainage, storm sewers, turf, and landsca m . Phase two inc . P g includes the installation of the rest room, sanitary sewer, and additional landsca Ping. 2:. Property Owner List: I have atta ' ched a.350 buffer list for each parcel. Some of the names. may overlap. cc: Tim Agness Bob..Bierscheid Vince Gillespie AA -ADA -EEO Employer . 20 _ . Attachment 7 DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION CrTY OF SA ATrr. Rntidy.C. Kcljy, Mnyor 300 City Rall Aaaex : TP_jePhs":c: 65; 25 West Pourth Starecctsimijc: 05 i -2�- i5 Saint , WkUesota 55102 TTY: 651-266-63-78 www ti stpau i. Ina. us/dOUParks February 2 8 5.2003tN R E C E �ED WAr* LIOMI'SmAR 0E strand td 3 X03 Assistant CoTnmunit I7evel intb-ircuory. city of Maplewood Maplewood, NIN 55109 RE: Conditions' for Use of SSandy 1 -.ace occer Proposa-I Dear Mr. Ekstrand& 011Vinr`jjj C Ut ti' Y . y f 1laple,wo'ed-t Tann ops . .�, � � • n s��on-Vl+�eting of February19, 2003 -the City or Saint Paul has reviewed t..e ..od' ' h n a*orsvr San; Paul's use of tie qainriv Lak_6 site as fasted on pages 47 a.nd 48 its the 17oc�d r-- J _... nnt•..•.�...,. on�;��n a� �,�Se 'ie,.� t Res+►u to ?. A..rji do ;�y� 1 t ' AR AI ed ..a ' Cop �, ch - a that Maplewood and Saint Paul &% �'�eet to further refine rin�i p es covering issues of desa " Pleme:ats, construction responsibilities, maintenance., and tiP' era.ions ti : - ' cludinz use of the f'acil4y by Maplewood. To that end, our staff met with ��r ,,.QQ .,a _ _ , Mr. . B_ruic I Anxides'rsop iV� �P��.� r. f r. -OA. r r. r;. . ��{{ s� .: a i_ ✓ as- ♦ oo-d D �L li d n Pa AS anu Recreation f, on Pebn, , 1; )()o-, unci L," a it -� , sh�ec cent telephone conversations �jit ► `. T Vill El�strand- Maple-�voo `- �sltst ant Cz ommanity Development Director. The following is a summary of the.issues that were di � , sc.�ssed. �. Saint PXLII }s p1YlT"1t sal �.Malms #-ilan n..�,r�,.•+,r,s:.. _4 �__ ' . • �'--r...-..,.. sv 4v+acl. LciVTi V1 SIX, fence -a' and gated soccer y.Pft� il#/jJi pin par, m facility. 2. it is- riderstooc gnat Saint -Pau - _�. _ 1 wauiti -uesponsible for coats �nclud,� ng de4a71t:p. construcuon, operations and mainte. nc . 3. Saint Paul agrees to theyndit;�►„ conditions se forth .'n th? r~iinditir,�''�asa 13 .. vvaa •.av ss Jb Z e1 uti �iV with the g y,"si11"r �^.ru1 R"uc%ILS CionSitel`aCl ons i AdA Condition 4, Bullet l_e V44 aaua, c.juc tl.eti.LiV/i Corner of Adolphus street and Skill nara A V%.ti'tiie.,1 Saint I atil WI11 ,aCce t it�e Cotid3ti P on the details of which sriould be Worked out -Maplewood S-tejF and , ; JAI c,t,zens. 21 A-CEV Enycr Paige 1 of 3 Condition 4 Bullet . ".. �.how�ug-an area. -fir . .. -p -Or-parking should theprotciposed palk;Tsp�ces �a tnsur _ent.i It should be noted that we bell v the J�- spaces iwe verysufficientcontrolled e e that and can be control led through mai wgvais�,.itb techniques,orUarable sites with move fiy1�j �..� ,}�� , ..: w . _._ iii aaa.a. �. �,�1'�%..�i i Ll Y located in Maplewood. Saint Poul IA/11f, Wore to identif'' ' - Y additional par.k�ng space. we prop t;� L „ ooi ' ' • u� p -e -par f s beAdentified by Saint Paul decision to require. constructionbut ani 9 be made only after the facilit as �� onPr ural•� ,� �...� a.'�.� the need is confi rnied. - Conditis�*� &A L $, "weir:-. .•. plans to -mo r a I.ve field soccer complex with the. field space closest to ihe�restro p om building reserved for development as a neighborhood park with Picnic facilities t P o� it�fi, S 1Ttof� ett- •�+ :lit NSA W.11 accept, the condition.. the'et of ��Ji;;.^;;Worked-out , with Maplewood staff and citzize;;s. However, subsequent convey - ... above sations have clarified that the, r reference �rac�s rouid- on the site Zvi t ' b six fields. r Condition moi. Bullet.�a `4 T M �`'ii��) �P� 1 fa • ude, a paved bice path doral the rl►1j1j�r1.4r o1, 'fF..n .�. P � sire. Saint Paul will accept this condition . ' ' • i alis oil the SOCCe�' ile.fd . _ �he�� � t - operty,=-thc details f w ich should be worked out with Maplewood staff. and citizens. ---- ether co'ndifions discussed at., - Cs.. L.l�i'4iAinliri 1= u'!"l1�a: Heai4 6ai"lu `w tilt lY�l ' staff. o plewoaa %,VnneCIl0n:--M-ft{� p ooU aff-have- indicated that a co-nnection to nearby Regi=d Mail and lake Mccarrobs Park -is ds''+. S Ai n t Pau l Fill aC4e"i ilii s N C6nditlo; 'where 4t fa �$i oi� i 1e cocci':' �e�: -� ' _.•,• P'vpe y alp is w�tng to work coon fil lfE�i� with �4Lpt11NG V t'LI � � } �. Park 1�lp.�einet�ta;; g agem—' , and others to achieve this goal, X ATi:Ptewoo Gs use: Stall discus : sed use of the facility for specific use by Maplewood ,and - agree that ! he faci : 1 a , ��'� would-be ted anti' rn� sn �d �'" SailtC Paul but that Maplewood world 1 wup tha t% tvr%w, r..: ��.. r • _ ;- .. . ..... %.—.,,..�p�„�,,a_l l �L first refusal) or designa.i-. ' fi "g ce�*►i1 « s-1Arh(;n the teids would be available'to . du�;n � the seas � Maplewoodn. Npe�ic ttme5have not been 'specif;ed b INI lewood t t - �� time. It should be not thata' a_ `'" 1 . D�3 would 3n no W�kV reSf7'7�t i'�pier.'^vu "ott6li it Y Vl l Scheduling the fiiieluS at other times. - Landscape buffers,. Ft w a iz 1%01 �, � ' J.! .•«eu out �t it is diffic li t to et a feelin• for t _. ....,g rhe Q1'1P tit �7s� ..,.,... �� t.�... --hi«.ieaiy larJape) a 3�rw Ifer afC �± 7 posed be.tWeen the residential area adjacent Siciiiman and the soccer fields. Tt is a � � ,�I ads d �hal Ye to portrav s;�AM Lr drawings so maybe it would help ;uc4 to ci�r� f� n �, .,�� ��,� .. �a 1pp��++ • ,► ••• - oss area The e alto die ,ieic �rnced airen shown on 61,= Arna.iw�w L`_ • shown .. area is approximately 1 0.5 . 22 a�:.r%x- 0 rmploycr P ,� gc 2 of 3.. t7o ' d. _11ji0i aeres. This is a very signiricsht"afca. Tfi�-Ml y comparison'l c=. think of that niany people might he familiar with. i- that AA ;;d a LL - Alas uie area between S.l1mar: Oren ue arl fount v crn street and the lent y length � s �►ot� feet longer than the State i�apitoi--�ia[1-frorn-tlze-�--*tol steps so�t�h• A►n . de � other v�ray forme to scribe this one buffer area is to . compare it to a t �ical'Saint Paul, rieraQhbor i�, .r'. P ark, which. would include a play area, � �ky and ;�; f�. ,.� ,: Vlll til open urea and i�n:rivvaasped 1'4ALr ter• .rte.. 1 r f1i 14,1 JL_--to-:o- acres.. We want to assure you That buffers would' also be placed on. the other ed e g sof the field area as . wcil but the south side seems t6be of the most, concern, we. �� t ri � also wan_ to.csas.,y that the specific tree species have not bee:: selec�P i at Wit. shout � - t_1 . ue 11 Lv�tiai . While ever �vr r aria � co ,� • v g �pw..��s , J I be �:�nsidered, they- are. very intolerant of lime and support less wii�ili.f�e ias� ,�."eciuousand. �p coniferous species which is what we would' recommend. Tinung: Cour intention is to substantially � -- n, ally start the protect as soon as we .a` given the go ahead by MaDlewood, That work w3,,1 ilm tvde sever a::.�.,. .,. .�1b111f�%,ctllt JLeps we MUSS % ,�rrv�.. M1M1;&h *1_ _f'1/1'�" tri i^ nM i�.. - • i r• r .+ . ``ud ne 1.1elds: Nome of these inc� fideompieiing a lease agreement which would .. be based on the conditions outlined by $ 'le vo�a�j,cow.'1ding fiesinn and a n % ei i. fail, _ _ . , b s and review' wt:h. apheowo , - �iori n`- +ding, and c;o n itself. Considering the steps outlined above, we anticipate that an aggressive gg a schedule for opening . the -facility would be 2005 or 2006, Finally we hope that theabove information addresses outstanding quessttons re-aroi+rig oliT propo dl and wAsh to thank the citimns of liilar a;'�o^ d fe% &,,me iirT'iti. iti�d `t ��, rr Ule �La for thier very profess; i iij VLAt ai this ., crus tacility will be a great iecrcaioidi benefit for Saint Raul and Maplewood. Please feel free t . o contact to self , on Tim' !4 Hess our p �sr i Agness, �n12Clp�� ����g�e�'; �+g`?�d��!b these iters. Sincerely, Bob Bierschied, CPRP Director, Saint Paul Parks and Recreation 13Blld w _. G:1Ut1/11NP1DFSICN1aaoGytekauuorlition4lw�t n�uemratfela2Sp�,w� . 23 wO-Emptoycr Page 3 of 3 Attachment 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Ekstrand, Assistant Community Development Director FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: March 3, 2003 SUBJECT: Maplewood Field Usage 9 The purpose of this memo is to follow-up on the meeting I had with representatives of St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department on Tuesday, .February. 25 regarding Maplewood's use of the proposed Sandy Lake complex. Maplewood is fortunate to have Hazelwood Park soccer complex. Hazelwood Park currently has seven or arguably nine soccer field. facilities, depending upon the configuration,. with five or arguably seven fields lit. Hazelwood soccer fields address 95 percent of our youth soccer play. The major problem that our department and. Hazelwood Park experience is what I- have referred to as "phantom soccer leagues.". Phantom soccer leagues are predominantly adults_ who utilize Hazelwood Park on Saturday, afternoon and arguably all day Sunday for scheduled, games and practices.. The issue of limiting access to public park facilities .has been challenging to say the least. We have posted that play is only permitted by permit, but it is difficult to enforce. It would be Maplewood's desire for the Sandy Lake soccer complex -to accommodate the "phantom. soccer league" individuals. Although ..cannot specifically identify teams, if time was made available at Sandy Lake, we certainly have the capability to meet with those individuals using our fields on the weekends and provide them an. alternate contact for field. availability vis-a-vis the St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department. .The predominant use ' for these non -sanctioned leagues is late Saturday afternoon and Sunday. In addition, a specific request that the (NESA) North East Soccer Association desires is to have the availability of two or possibly three weekends for larger play down tournament events/year. This. actually may only occur on an every other year basis,, but NESA:would like the opportunity to utilize both- Hazelwood and Sandy Lake as sites for a larger event. It' is important to clarify that the event: itself at. Sandy Lake would not be any different than any other daily activity, but in conjunction with Hazelwood Park they. would be able to offer an event for a larger number -of teams 'between the two sites. The other option would be the opportunity to "rest" the soccer fields at Hazelwood Park. It would be my hope that through a joint. management/maintenance plan, work out an agreement -where we could let our fields rest for a couple weeks to over seed and then reciprocate with St. Paul.to let their fields rest. t believe it is imperative that there be a very clear understanding that St. Paul is responsible for the maintenance, security and overall supervision of the Sandy Lake complex. I believe that the more use that Maplewood incorporates of the Sandy Lake complex, the. "grayer" the lines of responsibility become. 24 In conclusion, Maplewood's request and/or need. for the Sandy Lake soccer complex would be limited to the.'soccer associations, both* NSSA located in Roseville and NESA located in the Maplewood/North . St. Paul/Oakdale school district, for weekend tournament use. The second request would be for St. Paul to address'some of the. overflow usage -that we get from unsanctioned adult. programs. and lastly,. to pursue the. concept of allowing each -of our fields respites during the active summer schedule. Should you have any questions regarding Maplewood's intent, feel free to contact me directly . at ext. 4573. 25 Attachment g MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Ekstrand; Asst. Community Development Director FROM: Bruce �K. Anderson, Director of : Parks and Recreation DATE:. February 5, 2003 for the February 24 City Council Meeting SU BdECT: Sandy Lake Soccer Project Introduction The Maplewood Parks"- and . Recreation Commission and departmen't-staff formally reviewed the concept of developing .a soccer complex at .Sandy Lake in the fall of 2001. The concept of developing a soccer complex was. initiated by Ramsey County and St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department on an informal basis approximately one or two ears prior. The arks and recreation commission held two public neighborhood meetings- which concluded,with the parks anal recreation commission recommending -that the commission no longer take an active role in the public review process of the Sandy Lake soccer complex. A letter was forwarded 'on.January 3, 2002 to the neighbors indicating the parks and. recreation commission's position. it is important to understand that the letter clearly stated inara ra h four and I .quote: "Since. the November meeting., ] .have informally P 9 P reviewed the status of this project with- the Maplewood city council. The Maplewood city council understands that there is no project to review at this time and. that it is feasible_. that the Regional Water Authority, Ramsey County or the city of St. Paul may develop a P1 ro'ect which would ultimately reed .to be reviewed by the city. council at a future date.". The arks and recreation commission- has had no further forma! discussion on this issue since that date, but they are aware that the project has been resubmitted by the St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department. Background I have attached a variety of background information to assist in your review of the St. Paul Parks and Recreation Department's proposalJor a soccer complex at Sandy.Lake. Theparks and recreation commission was involved for approximately- five months'.fro-m Au ust 2001. to January 2002 reviewing the process. The enclosed correspondence and formal, commission minutes provides a snapshot of the commission s action on this issue. In addition to theP arks and recreation commission's action and minutes, i have included acopy of a letter dated November 15, 2001 from Vic Wittgenstein; director of St. Paul Parks and Recreation, which addresses the questions raised by residents at the September commission. meeting. In addition, I have included a letter dated N.ovemb.er 1.6, 2001 from Rob McHattie, president of Soccer Spaces, which outlines'the need for soccer in Ramsey County. Thearks. and recreation commission coordinated two public Meetings which were well. P . attended. The first meeting was held in September at the .Parkside fire station. The 2I }'IIIIIj Sandy Lake Soccer. Project Page 2 February 5, 2003 second meeting was held in October at the - Maplewood community center. It was clear that the residents: attending strongly opposed the soccer _project. The parks and recreation commission was supportive of 'the project in concept. Following two very contentious public meetings, the parks and recreation -commission' voted five to three to not' pursue any active support and/or endorsement of the project. The parks and recreation commission has not taken a formal position since that time, but 1. have kept them apprised of the project proposal by St. Paul Parks and Recreation. Department. The commission informally indicated at the January meeting that they do not desire to be involved. in the.review process. They felt it was more. appropriate to be: reviewed by- the planning commission and ultimately the ..city council for a final .decision. My professional recommendation -is to support.and endorse the concept as presented. There -is a great shortage of soccer facilities in St. Paul. Although it.could.be argued that Maplewood will not directly benefit. from the development of Sandy Lake- as a soccer complex, it is my -position that we would benefit indirectly by experiencing "relief" on -usage of our existing soccer fields by- residents of St. Paul. We currently. have a phenomena which I. have dubbed "phantom soccer leagues' which regularly use Hazelwood, Harvest, Sherwood and Playcrest Parks.Vile have addressed the. issue of non -permitted soccer field use for the. past three years .and have experienced difficulty in enforcing organized play on public park land. The one addition that I believe needs to be considered in the development of the. soccer complex' is a trail connection from the. comer of Adolphus Street and Skillman Avenue - The ultimate development of this. site will. Iinclude a trail corridor through the water works - property to Rice, Street on to. Lake '--Josephine to the west; .anal to the south to Roselawn and County Road- B. It has. been our experience that neighborhood trail connections greatly .benefit and enhance neighborhood. property values and provide increased .recreati.onal. opportunity.for. our residents. Recommendation It is my recommendation that the proposed development be reviewed formally. by the. planning commission and city council and that the. residents be. informed of the process as outlined in the January 3, 2002 correspondence. Should you. have any questions, regarding the parks and recreation commission's involvement in this project, feel free to contact me directly at ext. 4573. kdlsandylksoccer. mem Enclosures 27 � . . 4 Attachment 10 _•gis�,,iaN,"�.^tiS'.dl.,-.-.:y.%�.�:.W,4••.... ... =�►�+i'.�aartr•1.. " r41ii;•'' Of iii+ � �' I� .. ,•.. : , �'"� + "^.' Together We - Can _ January.' 24, 2003 .- NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY -- CITY OF ST. PAUL SOCCER PARK e This letter is to get your opinion on an • Y P app(i.cation the city received for in your neighborhood. The -Cit of St: Paul's Y Department of Parks and Recreation is proposing t0 develop,a six -field outdoor soccer park on the St. Paul Water Utilityproperty p p rty presently known. as Sandy Lake. The applicant is proposing. that the Sand Lake lime bed be con }j Y converted to use as soccer. fields. They propose.to plant trees to screen the fields from the homes to the soccer fields are proposed for only south. The .. . P P y daylight use at. this time. Night lighting is not proposed. The site plan is conceptual at this time. The applicant has not develo ed a s ecific r Planting plan for the site et. � P. P g ad�ng or . y Refer to the enclosures. - I need your o inion to he! meprepare• • •• P p a recornmendat�on to the planning commission and city council. Please write your opinion and comments below and return, this letter, and any attachments on which you have written comments, in th'e enclosedosta e- ' K February 3 2003. P g paid, envelope .by F ry If you would like further information; please calf me at 651-770-4562 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m: I will send you a notice of an ublic h y p easing on this application. Thank you for,your t comments. I will give them careful Consideration. r' THOMAS EKSTRAND -'ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' ENT DIRECTOR Enclosures: Maps and Drawings I• have no comments: Comments,:. •� S. cankQc (A Ste, 7 F it f1 ,1 C (St Paul Soccer Fields / Section 18) , IN OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E; 651-770-4s600 '; FAx 651-748-3096 ' -CITY OF MAPLEWOOD • 1830 EAST COUNTY RO • AD B MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 } f Date Source Action 1 /1 /72 Water Dept. Publication Lime 'Recalcining and Waste Water RecoveryPlant put into operation. p p Dred sludge S tory of St. Paul. Water made into small pellets. Supply 7/15/86 MN PCA Noise Pollution Control Rules Section 7010.0020 Definitions marked sub a* p its . regarding Daytime and. Nighttime hours (7 a.m..to 10. p.m. and 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) 8/5/87. Meeting of Water List detailing -complaints from. hauling with. names and addresses of residents - dust Department with area noise (starting before 7 a.m. and ending after 7 p.m.), vibrations, popping nails, residents .cracks in walls and stucco,broken patio door, gas leaks, hauling on Roselawn rather than County Rd. B, unresponsiveness of Water. Utility to complaints from previous5 years 10/.19/87 -Maplewood City .Council. Review of neighborhood concerns. regarding St. Paul Water Board's Water Meeting Treatment Plant. 10/19/87 Carolyn.. Peterson Petition presented to Maplewood City Council and state representatives to support, PPor ..and enact legislation that would ensure., suburban representation on the St. Paul. Board of Water Commissioners in the 1988, legislative session signed by over 200 area residents. 10/27/87 Carolyn. Peterson. Letter to Patrick J. Kelly, Attorney at Law, regarding information on .filter presses for - removing lime used by Minneapolis and questioning why St. Paul doesn't use this method.- ethod:11/3/87 11/3/87Minnesota Pollution' Noise monitoring on September 15, 1987, found noise levels in excess 'of State of Control Agency Minnesota noise standards. Includes letter and report 11/7/87 . Carolyn Peterson Letter to Gary Bastian questioning height of dikes and roads to a level even with ..houses, refers to lack results of study by health department as to the effects of all _ the lime dust and diesel fuel that Verne Jacobson of the Water Department refers to 12/28/87 Water Utility Comments. More than 50 years has owned and operated spent .lime storage lagoons. about Maplewood Water Utility recognizes that there are problems and' concerns it must' address but Ordinance on extraction . questioned the need for the Material Extraction and Hauling-. Ordinance, 11/1 /88 City, of Maplewood Material Extraction and Hauling Ordinance (No. 619) goes into effect RE C.E.1VED JAN 3.12003 Date Source Action 116/88. Michael A. McGuire, City Letter to Tom Mogren, General Manager, St. Paul Water Utility, re ' 9 ty, questing a written Manager. response. to neighborhood concerns from the October 19 1987 meeting. 1/11/88 Letter from 17 'residents 'Letter supporting Material Extraction and Hauling Ordinance. Details probi p oblems of past. 5 years with hauling and the fact that the' Water Department. says that this will be an -ongoing. operation. _ 1/11188 Newspaper. (St. Paul?) Suggested that terminating the operation (sludge removal would interrupt the Mplwd City Council Mtg production and. quality water supply .Tom Mogren mgr water dept. 1/11/88 Newspaper (St. Paul?) : City attempted to control the mining operations at the site tfirou h various means , 9 - Mplwd City* p ty Council Mtg including neighborhood. meetings with representatives of the water utility, . negotiations with the board • and passing a city noise ordinance, but has limited success. 1/11/88 Newspaper (St. Paul?) Sludge needed to be removed. because ponds are nearly filled to capacity, Mplwd •C•ity Council Mtg 1/1-1/88 Newspaper (St. Paul?) Residents complaints. -.removal of sludge-like'spent lime creates unbearable dust, - - Mplwd City Council Mtg noise, vibrations and general disorder i•n neighborhood. 1 /11 /88 'Newspaper (St. Paul?) Rehabilitating. the site will be impossible even -if new technology is enac,ted'that will Mplwd City Council Mtg alleviated the need for the storage ponds since the ponds will remain indefinitely Tom Mogren mgr.. water regardless of when the operation ceases. dept. .. 1/11/88. Newspaper (St. Paul?) Maplewood City council passed "material extraction and hauling" ordinance Mplwd City Council Mtg 1/1-1/88 Newspaper (St. Paul?) Ordinance'requires excavation operations in the city to be licensed. Mplwd City Council Mtg 1/11/88 ' Newspaper (-St: Paul?) Ordnance requires contractors to screen operation from view of residents, hold Mplwd City Council Mtg.. down dust, noise and vibration levels, adhere to minimum distance guidelines from nearby residences, keep site relatively attractive and renovate the site when done. Date. Source Action 2/2/88 .Proposed bili .Chapter Bill- requiring membership on water board or* commission b municipalities y that are 412.319 served by another municipality. ' 2/25/88 .Water Board Meeting Resolution. 3850 - establish a committee consisting or re p resentatives of the Board, 2 the Maplewood City Council and residents of the City of Maplewood to address complaints and' provide information in regards to spent -lime lagoon system. 319/88 Board -of Water First meeting to address problems and concerns of. residents.. Met throughout 9 t Commissioners 1988 and the results were the -wall and arborvitae behind the houses on Jackson." :i and Skillman (completed in 1989), haulingdone*on the NE corner, limitin of r g . hours r, and. days of -operations i' 511.2/89.. Water. Dept. Survey Survey of condition of homes on Jackson. and Skillman adjacent to the water department property to aid in future claims against the water department. 1989/.1990 Si Board of Water . Notes from�two years of meetings as residents worked -with Water Department to Commissioners- resolve issues. Advisory Committee ti 6/23197 Star Tribune New treatment process in place for removal of lime from water starting 1%1/97. Plans - to cover lime pit. with 4 feet of dirt creating either a new urban forest, or.a series of sports fields once environmental studies.are done.. In 1951 started adding lime to water. Wall now 20 -feet above..original lake surface. Lime 20 - 30 feet deep. 8/11/97 Mplwd City Council Plan for renovation of four small .la oohs north -of Roselawn but not for large lagoon . 9 . 9 9 Hearing on. proposal for north of Skillman. Plan to rehabilitate one- lagoon each year beginning. in 1997 and dime lagoons by St. Paul finishing in the. year 2000. Site plan labels Basin No. 5.as future Natural Open pi Water Utility Space (Landscaping to be Determined). 2/5/1 The Review Dave 39.2 acre site -is 20% filled. Done under the authorization of the Minnesota. Wagner; St. Paul Reg. Pollution Control Agency and is being conducted similar to that of capping a landfill. Water Services �. Stability needs to be carefully examined. Engineering/Project Manager 7/17/1 Pioneer. Press Bruce Maplewood doesn't' need any. soccer fields because it already has 26 -of -them. l Anderson, director of parks and recreation for. Maplewood 7/17/1 Pioneer Presse Vince Soil is being studied to see if it 'can stand up.to use as a soccer venue. St. Paul has Gillespie, manager of 5 soccer fields with 10 more in the works. recreation for St. Paul's division of Parks and Recreation s . 31 . Date Source Action 7/17/1 Pioneer Press Greg Has awardedrants to improvep or develop 9op 20 fields in such comm unities.as Mack, director of parks Mounds View, White Bear Township. Roseville, Maplewood and the city of St. Paul. ty and recreation for Ramsey County'. Peter. Fischer, 32 acre site - as of 11/314.8:7 acres had been filled. chairperson Maplewood Parks and Recreation _ Commission 12/24/1 Dumping. on Christmas Eve , 12/31/1 Dumping on New Years Eve 1/.1/2 Durnping on .New Year's Day. : Attachment 11 Y ff�'J 21- ConI f,, vh.'ie✓e�a��,.� -8..1 je. -f�7L,1 le loor 'So r '0090 celoop S4-.C4 �r' �2ti ✓ `%� "I 'al i 0000 -PX te Ve, C1 1,L2� �C " ` � ��(1�SJ 21' �„��.-1��'1 �• 9---�'�C���s� l_..I-�S_�—�`�—�xI P��Y v.lJa�}�4L�t Roc-f-e ®r V-P llIII1II1'�&I,;llIIP lisp 004 -k7- -e v -��-r ..�7L-i cl - IPOS 0f cc_ 0- -&Z- A —�z 0 772 WO. 24 1 -0/— - A-0 L All- no / ftOIQL�%/1� --- --------- 14 n zi 0- 40 J s U fey.-���%p��,�---��•�----L✓-�-W - i o v r40. Q ro vh c/ , J��rovJ IOP7...__ _wQ 3�- 7"'o_._..�i.a-�c�..__ot_�� zo 7�� - �----:.- --- -- °-�_ 4� 0 je oAI -�l�_�-h�,��. q Z 0*7 _ ` �1--�-v_.�� .__; a ,--✓°o% c -e_ __.:I'e �'�eor�_� �'or���e- �'i �J_o.�'_�a.s�_v� �1e�.� �_-7Z-O _...s'c► y . o /-r _� __1� Cl r. 2 f -- yef-,-7'�� � -- 724 L.. -�4a j.1� d__ L_/_C 'o 0,-� _:_� ►"- 7L� x.1.2 -�c.�/c%J' .:_�h�j 4� 4.00 _0 C -r. .Lurgi - 34 'i Attachment 12 . -.T • .tt wA•i.!vql2ia% •t.. 7" ..i?I'•i'I....t fi ... r tt :. 1�.:!kY�•,,yy.....�Y^RWfMJCp....M�C...........i•!::1.'ttd�•LN:JiYCY,}ji'•Miii;r�.":.�ird :L+�i'1 . i �% tr,s ,• 1E7.yr,.. "�..,, �. Y/ y � cis � ��: .. E: ..rr ,.i. .:! 'il'• r/ :7!' ,"';�'•j<:�.rJ!S.aw. wvn:.!'eT7..ii�. EEEEa - - TO We Can. `{ Janua.ry 24, 2003 KELLYATHOMPSON I . 151 DOWNS AVE E MAPLEWOOD, MN 55117-1912 -CITY OF ST.. PAUL StJCCER PARK NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY This letter is to get your opinion-on an application the city received for property in our P y Y -neighborhood. The, City of St. Paul's 'Depa'rtment of Parks and Recreation. is p'roposing.to develop a six-field outdoor soccerpark on ;the St. Paul Water. Utility property presently known as Sandy, Lake. .The applicant.is proposing that -the Sandy.. Lake- Iime bed be converted to use *as. j soccer- fields. They propose to plant trees to screen the fields .from the homes to the- south. The soccer fields areproposed for only daylight use at this time. Night lighting is not proposed. The. 1 site plan* is conceptual at this time. The applicant has not developed a specific grading or planting •plan•for the site yet. Refer to the enclosures. i need your to help me prepare a recommendation to the planning. nd .; P 9 a clty- , council. Please write your opinion and comments below and return this letter, and -any attachments on which you have written : comments' in the enclosed postage-paid envelope by February 3, 2003. If you would like further informatio* n,lease. call me at 651-770-4562 'between n 8. a.m. and 4:30 p.m. .1 will send you a notice of any public hearing on this application. Thank you for your: • m coments. I will give them careful consideration., •, .. .. g - .THOMAS EKSTRAND ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -DIRECTOR Enclosures: DDMaps and Drawings'. JAN •2 ® 20n3 have no comments: _ cM "M _ 4. _ =0_ , .. Comments: � �� 7 . ........... 46 V J ,7 J r y 0161, (St.. Paul Soccer Fields'/ Section 18) .35 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 651-770-4560 FAx: 651- 748- 309 6 '' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1.830 EAST COUNTY ROAD. B MAPL.EWOOD,: MN 551.09 37.- ,41Aq ' iBry M1!1t4Me,ry:'t1Ji�`Y vt , { i. •gni»':iil :"(1-.S_r:..'':lll. Attachment 13 .Together We Can January 24, 2003 NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY - CITY. OF ST. PAUL SOCCER PARK . This fetter is to get your opinion on an application the • • pp e city r•ecelved for property In your neighborhood: The City of St. Paul's Department of Parks and Recreation iso in p ro p s g to develop a. six -field outdoor soccerpark on the St. Paul Water Utility property resentl y p p y p y known as Sandy Lake. The applicant is proposing that the Sandy Lake- lime bed be converted, to use as soccer fields.:' Th propose to _plant trees to screen the fields from the homes to the south: The soccer fields .are proposed for only daylight use at this time. Night lighting isnot proosedThe* site plan is conceptual- at this time. The applicant has not developed a specific gradingor. planting pian for the site yet. Refer to the enclosures. 1 need your opinion to help me re area recommend • P P atlon to the planning commission :and city council. Please write your opinion and comments below and return this letterand an attachments on which you have written comments 1 y 1 , In the enclosed. postage -paid envelope by February 3,.2003. If'you would like further -information,lease call me at 651-770-4562 P between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. I will -send you a notice of any public hearing on this application. Thank you for your- -comments. Pp y y r •comments. I will give :them careful consideration: - THOMAS EKSTRAND -`ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEV .. ELOPMENT DIRECTOR Enclosures. Maps and Drawings 0 Comments: /• 6L- IoY7 �� 4ot= SONAN 7-6_.�a `41 WT 1. Vic; ,,�-c?•c�:.� ,,;c.��,��,,� SW i t. Wr Fie! / Sectia 8 - 1(4L OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT651-770-.4560 F - AX. 651 748 3096 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1.830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B MAPL EWOOD, MN 55109 38 39 Attachment 14 John Hackman 2011 Jackson St. Maplewood, M-N 55117 Dear Sir; I'_m writing in regards to the proposed soccer fields on Sandy Lake: I Tive at 2011 Jackson Street. My wife and I and our children have lived here 17yrs and enjoy this quiet neighborhood and the scenery that we have now. These soccer fields that are proposed come to the city with high price. More police for all the problems that will occur with this complex: and who will do all the clean up and pay for these after func+ions. This neighborhood has been to many meetings on this and the city doesn't listen to the people in our area at all. When Mayor Norm Coleman was Mayor of St. Paul they proposed this to him and his response was not in my City. This is St. Paul's problem, not the city of Maplewood. We do not want this complex in our city. You say no lighting is proposed?. In 2 yrs then they will come back to the city to propose adding lights. Please stand by the people in our neighborhood and tell the city of St. Paul to ask another city to accept this complex. We like our neighborhood the way it is. Please keep our neighbors and our neighborhood informed of any meetings that will be held. Again we do not need this complex here. Thank You, John :Iackman 1 FES � � 2003 40 1 Attachment 15 January 26;.200.3 Thomas Ekstrand 1.830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN .55109-2797 -Re: Soccer Field Opinion & Comments We are for the idea of having- a park developed i n this area. We like 9 p P ike the idea ofplanting of trees to screen- the area from adjacent residents. I know that th.is land won't. sit dormant. In m . o inion a .recr a ion I y p e t a .. park is a great idea over an . industrial park.. Ask the. neighbors if the .would rather see a. found in their Y dry backyard, or soccer -fields. If one doesn't think 24 hour a day businesses could be put here, a reminder is the Roselawn Business Park that .is adjacent to.,35E. I recall 30 t years or so back when the local. residents were not ha with this business PPY -development and the business park is here ' toda Y Our other comments / su estions are: 1 ) Do we need 6 soccer fields or could soccer 9g } cce fields and one baseball diamond be feasible? 2) The park could be open in the winter months .for ice skating. .3). The. park should be- open for local residents use,. during no.n- soccer activities. 4) A bicycle path. could be built around the perimeter of the park. Are there any ideas proposed for the area west of Jackso'n'. Street,. .adjacent to ROselawn Avenue, to the railroad tracks? Thank. you for this opportunity for us. to provide comments , John Strantz o Rose. Strantz 1.12 Rose[awn Ave. E. Maplewood, MN 5511.7-1924 41 Attachment 16 John W. Chapman 160 County Road B- East -Maplewood,. MN 55117 January 30, 2003 Thomas Ekstrand Assistant Community Development Director - Office of Community Development City of Maplewood 1.830 .County Road B East Maplewood, I1i.1N 55109 Re: Neighborhood .Survey - City-of St. Paul. Soccer Park Mr.- Ekstrand: I am writing to express my opinion on the plans: for a soccer ark on the Sand Lake . -property, as communicated in your letter of Januuary 24 and its enclosures. While I am ... pleased withma.ny of the ideas that have-been implemented I n the latest plan, there area few issues that I feel strongly about. I made. some notes on the plan to indicate what I am. talking about. 1. There should be an entrance to the park from the south via Adol hus P Street. This would provide direct freeway access to the park, Adolphus being less than 100 yards from the 35E freeway. ramps. Allowing access to the ark . P from Adolphus Street would share the load of _traffic caused by the park. The current plan would send more cars through 'the congested; com p Iex and dangerous Rice Street/County Road B/Hlghway 3.6 intersection. The section of County Road B between Rice and the proposed sole entrance can be . P extremely busy at tunes, and already serves, as an overflow route during rush -hour. In addition; there is heavy traffic at certain times from the two schools along this section of County Road B- and from the St. Jude Medical Center office. The impending opening of the new ,doe's sporting goods mega-store will only increase the traffic problem. It only seems natural that a park serving St. Paul,. our neighbor to the south, would have a southern entrance, especially when it would be so convenient from the freeway. Adolphus S treetshould. have an entrance to theP ark as well. rrZ A �. � . 42 d- 2. Although on- the Soccer Location Study -Concept -diagram' there isa great .deal . of attention paid to the planted screen south of the park, I think as much or more attention should be pard to the screen on the northern side, as. m .. Y house and those of my neighbors are closer to the fields and the" arkn lots than the majority of the residents .south of the park: I would like to. see the planned screen north of thepark be as thick. aspossible: Despite' my criticisms included here, I believe the ark can be a positive addition . p p � 1 e addition to Maplewood and. to my neighborhood:. The plan 'to not include lights. . critical as this . g would be a real. deal. breaker for all. of the neighbors. I would also like to. see concrete plans made to ensure that there is adequate security to discourage ni httime..0 se of the parking lots. Thank you .for this chance to express my opinion's on -the Sandy Lake project.L would welcome any further questions you might have, and would like -to hear of 'any meetings, or hearings associated with . the project. Sincerely, Jo n W. Chapman 160 County Road B E. Maplewood, NIN 55117 i (651) 428-456.6 43 . .. . I vol ... il, � .._: ,- . . '-. ..;m• " ' N .i ' .ate_ �. ��I .t .. i, -j ..ter " _ ti I .1 m . .. j- �'L:+. 1 r .31MISr .,. g,.J.'` V. •• R lM+. .. r -_ I t.1a •r Iilq.^-r:7 .a•''i�... .JL - ­:. ; 'G y ::;: 1.,pw� ir 71 ya �.i t':"� ~���,:> .�... .r: ..: 2-a :.: .i. -^''i - -il!'•�'-L',:: ;,�• r. _ _ _ .. •, �.•Lfy,a„.`. ,kyj/f�1t .:7: . .j :ti_ _ •lt{�, ,rr 'S: .,:r. ~.i•.�:Lr' wt. r., kr' -" ,.. _ .':+ _-. ..?> . 1T*: .. ,... •!'„97:, • ri1 :4..1 �4,_u,,,':1�-.y {{yr,;•-��1 .'•t 11 L,. rr..7«� L• '"w•l:iw1. .•,7 ''``7��'u,i __ I �JY'�'i%jL,..�,. ," •'{: •i' '! - �'.' j ,. s.:.:+1:•ifi'�.�G( .1; .-. •; •r''�,`r�;,z- .' �.'.'T. (,( y l.iJ. :. .. ,. 't!':::.l:I.i:;r•�• ''n' ..il ti": r.r :r.:l� •• _•.•-1114 Ia y.'.O t, ,.'1 .y,r./".,� ;vf I •4 t,r .t. �I •!•: •:. •r. . �„1/.,+; • . •t:. - i.. _ !i!' - rr. 't ;j ,: r r ..5 �y�t v � - •?t,. •, i1: 5. :.r' .,.r•S. wi:'.:31w i.. !"�a:wiSi - ,:: a tiY, •'.!••; •' •17 "•,, . (/•` i:t. �:��i. IA.L'.Y:4::�•�'i ,�::.1,;{a' .4•r.. «,.:.,.t r '„ ';'til 'r. 'fl.. YI'A .•MICI•.., i%Yi,!:;ly •. �; .It}!:.>.\• ij:i•�.. st. ,5� •�' f - «r t. .a�Lr '-rw :t gd:yi.v •:i: + Li, lam•...: [�.•��r" . ,; _ yl• .. ;•fir.; �,•„�,:�., ,; ,-,r, :ilt,•' r'• ::dots %• •': i.:,lN:.' .' 'n nl ...� ei:'' ..`y.. t •kY •r -.a•:':...• �r -.�{. �.'. ! �r l..•« {:.. r.�, . "/j'�iti•.... '�:i �{i'►'••` _ • • 11'. J�+,�', J7rJy •�1::iA•�4 _ ... -cr.r >•�►' ... 1{• ;".'f •: ;':its►'• . r %••.i::. ra+ '.1: r ..• i.Vl',M," •„'.qy .•y `;r v':1•`nli/ir' r-� f ..� •:r-,' �i4'. +1'� f'.1 w'•'Y; - `,.Y !/t » J. y . . '-if. ;, %. �.. •-'T I •:n. .,n:: •.Y.. •. .. : -f :J1 i �yy�y�aLF..'� st }r•' , ., 'y.,• ii: {irn', i��T�«; i� 11' - `ars `: 'i .-W ... w •'�•7� ':lbr `• '.!'fir' t •• ''••,� :.{a:•::�.j J"--•!i:,2'J� ..*,L'• ••� •-�y 'V'- ..+y'T. �t j��i.,i i �u7�•. is :i. Hf.l:�•: Si a..,.• .r . >A .:� "'..'-•!7;OI�''y;F' .,:.�y£il !(/rf.;l1[?M:iO' '�'. t• '',}i - !r. .1 ... '•. (' .•'Ti -'ti• :i•'.�.-.�.L •+:: .'.;4't. ' ���_ a.:, r .. A!, I -�N -I .. .. �. _�,,. ar". I :7 d .1•n '�'1•: ♦ry'!:A y .., ",tt+• r. .;-s.'�-'-�' ;, ii ;;'' --, 'tir,'/N�/0.' O. •Irl �•L' ^+�,_' ':i%... _ V•` ••1.'%'.t'J.« _i.�wa r, J. ... .:i�V- •i Y i. 1-' ;: ::J.. w • l •'�„ ' •r ''•- '. ' ;i !4''i'T .� ,. J. ,y., :,61a.'.!r..:.�+ •.Ir• .t _i . MV._ ':i;:a..; 1 hA ! % 'ytl .'i! . /'V•.. q L fir. •l ,fit' .:r',. _ . �''"•' . alp J. i." •lr Y is .� '+�� '( . . •` :4"4..'.77,..Z.*, •,:...i.%rl w. ..•..: _ Im- ::�;:rl; 'H. r . t ir'�Y�L`i:-uM" tr'•i(1.'•t X4'.1• - ,• . `'�'. ; 1:{181' .cn 1.1-4Z - . M., ",* *' I 0 E 7-- •-71 '.. L ,� v -a:•:•:• i~ :1(^ Y x•�x►" y:. �t •k:.::" �.. rt_ •,. ♦�� ts. '.7 3. v ':�lijlvia' r 'J• •.•U .:nw'Ir?n W �. �'::Kfriyl�=�. ..i . .. �tr•r Y' 'r f.:'.. yr•r.s t L. ,: '; ":uVia '. .:;:,.,• - ' .r• - g .�' ,r .'1', • '. �•\ •t» , T • y •: '�I &.p `r+:i'il:.. '- t. .y /.illy i • .!>! ' • .a111' r�: M ;.�1�Y•..f •. ~'4..r ':' :K./taut: t . ` -t7A' . •' .- I .1 . 'c1: ,. , ; r':rp fi'•:• 'M'I °+► - (�-Ir' � t W. ":s=,-.14'�y ,- ilm. :a. F.. 'j �, FI. yy��`�l! 1 .., rn A. rfl(,!h ly„ki'� -'guar it l� - - ...• ;�ij(_.. \. Al :It)�. ; .'�. .. w:. s'd... . ti lr� t' } b .. �.: ., - 1. , . .. ' . ;Ir. il: ^Ttr .;240.r f,l\•: •' �'. x -, .."1.. >; ?F3'to I+. �•,'' : • dry. (y I V .. o . • +. - $t _ 1:..,, a'`�1.i .,i :ii: i : 1•. - -1 17.2, r•' '1�.' a. . • 'i rw • t. " i : ;},. .r +.,'Jair• ,..il L1111-+� j(: ,.z: jiJe -., �, ,t....: u;'•-� y j ► a ..�, rr ` - r. -i :i^ .1 IG t :'.L.- ,J,.tsi.'• .ti.7�i,• ,,,,ti .: ':l '_-,�•'t i' 061150',• i ':itit'. 71• -..' . '1:11{. i1 { N.. i:. h T� h� •► tf' .rPY.j::Ic:'•Jafi n _ .., -.. /.;.'J .•s!f=' i' NI. L f ` r:% f4 '_f 'y.. i;?.•"„ , 1. , INM- :i,'.�+r,"II.:'• ,•xi.,; .1:`•,. •�,i:"'' 71.11 :•-- •�t•j}3ii;!;• .%, .. ' fit T.u:, f4. --1f'"t•.. 5:.• a.^ .Y ,.i P.M.� _�7a .. '� ► &NJ, - lfv •. - fir' . .,t,. •. �r1: M'.a ' 1. t. .:�,er. i... -Oim R1t�.�• ,J'"_ ,.+;. :.it:.�, _ •1: »l i'..i 'it:, .t: '�r:,•. '.k, '� ''JI�"'i' •1 +,{• � . a.'•~' ,t. -l -i - . :�'i 't ^ . .'a�..'i -'LAG,:t... "'.1. �V., 7,t 1-•• v . :•. f..r i• .1. j• �` .1:.`'~ .:9, .; ell.' r ',w ; - : i _. ! :'ji Yw+a(•,j; • �' '�� :-�« - .. .. ' i -.4.., J •' * Zm w.� r:Jt. ?, :? :'ii-. .i�.'slf'-, ny.; Attachment 17 Department of Public Works Kenneth G., Haider, P.E., Director and County Engineer E NGINE E RING/OP E RATI ONS ADMINISTRATION/LAND SURVEY 3377 N. Rice Street 50 West Kellogg Blvd., Suite 910 Shoreview MN 55126 . . RA(vtSEY COUI�fTY St. Paul, MN 55102. • (651) 266-2600 • Fax 266-2615 � � � Shoreview, . (fi51) 484-9104 Fax 482-5232 E-mail: 'Public.WorksC co.ramsey.mn.us MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood FROM: Dan Soler Ramsey C unty Public Works SUBJECT: City of Saint Paul Soccer Fields DATE: January 28, 2003. . The. Ramsey County Public Works De artment has reviewed the p conditional use permit for construction 'of a soccer field complex •in the Cit of Maplewood. Ramsey . y . p y County .has .several concerns regarding access and traffic flow for this development. L. The, proposed redevelopment of the site will construct 6 -new - P w soccer fields along with parking 'space for 235 vehicles. This vvi11 generate additional trips to and from the site at the access point on County Road B. The additional -traffic generated. is -not expected to- cause p.. operational problems aloe Count Road B . . P g _Y _ . 2. The proposed access onto Count Road B will be constructed at or County near the existing gate access into.the site. Sight lines are adequate at this location. The access road should. be constructed to a. width of 26 �32 feet at the opening to Count Road B. . p g y This well allow easier turning movements in and out of the site., 3. The existing shoulder aloe eastbound Count Road B shoul - g y d be widened and re striped to provide aright turn lane into the site. 4.- The City of Saint Paul will be required to obtain permits from q p. Ramsey County for any work within Ramsey County right-of-way along .County Road B. Thanks for the opportunity to .make comments •re ardin this issue. • g g s e. If you have any questions or need. any additional information please give mea call. G 3 V1 Minnesota's First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a minimum of 10% post -consumer content AiSCME /i�./� 5 wow u.t i Attachment 18. i Lo A36anv 46 ociptuf tiver 1 0y 4evvi I Mr. Peter. Fische . Chal etsot"t Ze 30Vd f AMOV, 47 Iq3 t�ilns T A cw sT JUS,, 1/,,, AS) �wns P4�... �O �� -=Vd 49 -8vzee8i7TG9 GE :8 T TOOZ /ZO O T �uuE��Eir zoz �/r• V�nlorvv`kiE, E.. A Aft =&AamL -A f Attachment 19 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the. City. of St. Paul is proposing. a change to p(openthe city's land use Ian from OS space) to P (park). WHEREAS, this change.app lies to the. property located on the.south side of CountyRoad B East west of :Interstate 35E in Section 18, .Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1 On February 19, 2003, the planning commission held a public hearing. The cit staff published . Y a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.. The planning. commission gave everyone at the hearing .a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council not approve the plan amendment. 2: On March '10, 2003, the city. council discussed the proposed. land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the.city council approve the above-described .change for the following reasons: 1. The. proposed soccer complex would meet Maplewood's mission to provide a comprehensive, balanced and sustainable. -system of parks, open spaces/natural areas, trails and leisure -oriented activities/programs for city residents to use and enjoy in as cost- effective manner as possible.... 2. It would. provide city residents with parks and natural areas for recreational uses as visual/physical diversions from. the hard surfacing of urban development and as a means to maintain the character, ambience, appearance and history of the community. 3.. It would. maximize the recreational opportunities available to city residents through the development of fair and equitable. working partnerships between the city and the local -5 CAL I ovi district, adjacent cities, county, churches. and civic organizations. 4.. It would provide city residents with an interconnected trail system for transportation and recreation purposes and as a means to tie divergent- parks and open space with the broader community. 5. It would convert an unattractive and unusable lime pit to an attractive. and ' useablep ark. 8. It would provide relief for existing soccer fields that are heavily used. 7. It would create and foster. a cooperative working relationship with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County: 8. It would serve as a regional recreational facility. This is advantageous since recreation does not follow town borders. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on. March 10, 2003. 53 Attachment 20 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of St. Paul applied for a conditional use permit to construct -the Sand Lake Soccer Complex. . p y WHEREAS, Section 36-52(4) of the city code requires a conditional use permit for any public. service' or public building use. .WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located on the south side of County. Road B East on the west of interstate 35E. 'The legal description is: . Parcel #18-29-22-12-0010: South .140 of North 270' of E 442', 68/1.00. Norah 130'.6f SW %4 of NE subject to County Road B part of NW' % of NE 14 S. E. LY of -160' W.W. R/W. in SECTION 18 TOWN 297 RANGE 22. Parcel #18-29-22-24-0024: Subject to Avenue; except South 15' of East 320'. of West 1790' of NW ex. Part in James 1 st Addition part of said NW %4, -S. E. LY of W.W. R/W in SECTION 18 TOWN 29 RANGE 22. Parcel #18-29-22-24-0001: SECTION 18, TOWN 29, RANGE 22. 100' W. W. R/W across N 2/3 of SW.'/ . 165' W: W. �R/W across S '/ of NW %. 160' W.W. R/W across N $/d of E /2 of NW ' % of SECTION 187 TOWN 29, RANGE 22. Parcel -#18-29-22-12-0009:. SECTION 18, TOWN 29., RANGE 22, 160' W.W R/W across NW % of NE % of -SECTION 18, TOWN .29j. RANGE 22. WHEREAS,the history of this conditional .use permit is as follows: 1... On February. 19, 2003,. the planning commission recommended, that thecity council approve this permit. .. 2. On March 10; 20031 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to--_speak__-and---present-- written -statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission: NOW, THERE ORE, of 1T RESOLv Eu that the city council approve .the above-described conditional . use permit, because: 1. The use would .be. located, designed, maintained-, constructed and operated to. be in, conformity. . p tY with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2: The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding. area. . g. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 54 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, . detrimental,. disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, 'fumes water or air pollution, , drainage, water. run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access. on existing or proposed. streets. 5. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, includingstreets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and* sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. & The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate. the site's natural and scenic features into the development design.. .9. The use would cause minimal adverse. environmental effects. Approval is subject. to the following conditions: 1 A detailed site plan shall be submitted to the city for approval. All construction shall. follow the approved site plan. The director of community development may approve minor . changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within two years of. council approval or the permit shall become null and void. 1 The city council shall review this permit in two years. If the applicant has not substantially started this project by that time, the city council may consider renewing this permit. 4.. The applicant. shall submit detailed plans that include, but are not limited to, the following: • A detailed landscape and tree -buffer plan with quantities, sizes, species and locations. • , A detailed, grading, drainage, erosion control and .utility plan. • Storm water run-off calculations. • A site plan that provides setback dimensions, the location of trails, parking lot dimensions and the location of. any fences (including material, height and color). • A trail connection to the corner of Adolphus Street and. Skillman Avenue. • A right -turn lane into the proposed site from County Road B. • An area for "proof -of -parking" should the proposed 235 spaces be insufficient. • "No parking" signs along the main driveway. • A. neighborhood park- element with features like a picnic area, tot lot, swing sets, etc. * A paved bike path around the perimeter of the site. •. The driveway entrance widened to 26--32 feet. • A gate at the driveway entrance: 5.. Site I.ighting shall not be allowed for night play, Staff may approve security lighting if it is found, to be needed by the police chief for security reasons. 55 6. Park. maintenance shall be provided by the City. of St. Paul: 7. Tournaments and scheduled. events shall not bring in outsidevendors or merchandise .without a permit from the city clerk. In certain situations, the city manager may require city co-unci) review and approval. 8., The applicant shall be responsible for locking the gate each evening. 9. The. applicant shall 'also submit a program identifying the hours of use, the teams or groups using this. facility and their ages. They shall also submit, the management plan. for the facility. as well as a plan for enforcement should. there be , any problems. 10. The City of Maplewood may. require that the City -of St. Paul provide additional police staffin 9 and security at any events at the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex: The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on March 10, 2003. we DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2003 V. PUBLIC HEARING a. Saint Paul Soccer Center (County Road B) Mr. - Ekstrand said the City of St. Paul's Department of Parks and Recreation is proposing to develop. a six -field outdoor soccer park on the northerly. portion of the S .. Paul Water Utility property south of County Road B. This property is part of the Sandy Lake lime disposal area for the St. Paul Water Utility.' The applicant is proposing these soccer fields for'use during daylight periods as there would not be- lights for night play. There would be 235 parking spaces plus a lavatory building: - The. applicant proposes -to buffer the playing .fields by planting a 309 -foot -wide wooded area along'the south side of.the fields.* There are areas of existing trees for screening.on -the north/northeast.. This soccer complex would*fill a need for additional soccer fields needed by the City of St. Paul for their soccer programs. This facility would be used for regular game., scheduling as well as for tournaments. .Mr. Ekstrand said that from a land -use standpoint, the proposal would provide an attractive, low density use for this barren, unappealing land. If the city council were to approve this proposal, the applicant must ,provide the detailed plans as outlined in the staff report for a more thorough review. Commissioner Trippler asked Mr. Cavett to. respond to a letter from a -concerned resident regarding the' -stability of -the land after it will be. filled in do to -the large amount of lime. Mr. Cavett, Assistant .City Engineer,, said this. type of project is actually a good use for this land.. When soil is loaded on something that. is water bearing like lime it will actually get surcharged and. settle out. He said since you are not building facilities on the land, what minimal settlement that' will occur will be. -easy to deal with. He does not see the settling as an issue as long as it is filled in over time. -He is sure -'the applicant will be dealing- with soil experts. Commissioner Trippler asked what the long range costs would be on an annual basis, for the City of 'Maplewood? His understanding was the city and the county will. actually be maintaining the site. Mr. Ekstrand said this proposal.will be developed and maintained by the City -of Saint Paul. There should be no operational costs for the City of Maplewood. He said any police and fire calls at the park would be handled by the City of Maplewood: Commissioner Trippler said there was discussion about having access to the south of: Skillman Avenue and -Adolphus Street. He said there's a huge drop-off in that area and he wondered if that area.would be filled-in in order -to gain access? Mr. Ekstrand said. that was not proposed by the applicant. It is. -not something that the neighborhood wants but from, a park design standpoint and an access standpoint they felt that there should be a trail connection. Staff felt it would be wise to. connect to the neighborhood to the newly developed park. Commissioner Mueller asked staff if they: knew how the applicant would grow the large trees that are depicted on the. plans so quickly? Mr. Ekstrand said staff does not have those details yet...The applicant submitted a tree.plan but it pp p does not give details of the size of the trees to be- planted. Commissioner Mueller'said he thought he read that St. Paul hadfirst rights tothe soccer park and if the park wasn't being used, Maplewood's soccer. teams could use it. Mr. Ekstrand said he thought that was correct, however 'he is hearing..that is incorrect.from the applicant. in the audience. He said he would let the applicant answer that question. Commissioner Mueller asked if there have been- other proposals for thisp iece of land? And.if this space remains open space what would it look like? Mr. Ekstrand. said no there have not been other proposals for this land.. He said if it remained an open space it would look unattractive and almost. desert like. Because of all the lime he does not believe it would support much growth. Commissioner Mueller asked about. the 235 proposed. parking spaces. He said he did a calculation.and when he includes people coming early, games overlapping, and additional family members coming to' the games he finds a shortage of parking spaces. Commissioner Rossbach said he was.. -.curious if Sandy Lake is. covered under Maplewood's mining and extraction. ordinance? Mr.- Ekstrand said he would have to do some research .into that. Commissioner Rossbach said he thought that came into play during the process. In that mining and. extraction ordinance there are some restoration specifications having to do with sights. That would relate to Mr. Mueller's question, regarding what this site would look like if it remained an open space. Mr. Ekstrand said :staff will look into that further. Chairperson Fischer said she noticed in attachment #19 the reference to the phantom soccer: leagues, is this common or uncommon? Mr. Bruce Anderson, Maplewood Parks & Recreation Director, said phantom soccer leagues are very common. He said Maplewood. has a number of large organizations that participate on Maplewood's soccer fields after the organized play on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. He said from Memorial Day to Labor Day, 9 out of 10 weekends are going to have active, organized play which is not scheduled through- Maplewood's Park &. Recreation Department. Commissioner Rossbach asked Mr. Anderson what problems would that cause for the City of Maplewood and the parks? Mr: Anderson said the problem is the extensive use of the soccer fields because the- soccer fields get beat up and destroyed. The fields. are used seven days a week for several hours a day. The fields are designed for the residents and for youth play,'' During the adult play they oftenla p Y during. the rain and inclement weather and this is when the fields can get destroyed. The parks department has resodded these fields. three times in the last seven years. Trying pto kee. these fields in game ready condition is very difficult. With additional -soccer fields, -,this would hopefully alleviate the problem of the soccer fields being over. used in Maplewood.. Commissioner Mueller said regarding the soccer fields in Maplewood can one, an in Maplewood p Y p use the fields and are specific organized leagues using the fields from. other communities? Mr: Anderson said there have been groups from the outside usingthe'fields and it is very difficult rY to regulate .the use of public fields. He said the Park & Recreation department has posted signs at the sites with "organized. play by permit only" signs, but it is very difficult to manage the field or remove players from the. field complexes. -He said it continues to be a challenge to keep the soccer fields in good playing condition after adult soccer has been played. Commissioner Mueller asked Mr. Anderson if the hope was that. if six more soccer fields were. built this would help address the overuse of. soccer fields? Mr. Anderson said yes. Commissioner Pearson asked Mr. Anderson if the issue of phantom soccer leagues wasn't more of a .police enforcement issue rather -then the need for additional soccer fields? Mr. Anderson said it's a difficult public policy issue.- He said the police department doesn't enjoy having to go. to a park and ask people playing -soccer to leave a public park. He said it isn't that the people are doing anything wrong at the park it's just that the soccer fields are getting abused. because ofoveruse. Commissioner Pearson said his point is he believes the problem will still exist even if there are six more soccer fields built. Mr. Anderson said having six more soccer fields would still alleviate the problem. Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the commission. Mr. Bo Bierscheid, the Director. of Parks & Recreation for the City of St. Paul, 25 West Fourth Street in St. Paul, addressed the commission. Mr. Bierscheid said this proposal has been brought before the City of Maplewood before. He. said the issues that were brought up by. the residents in'the past have been addressed this time. He said there is a desperate, need for .soccer fields throughout this entire area. They have been participating with Ramsey County and the Soccer Partners program whereby they give additional funding to municipalities to -develop soccer fields.. This development would be supervised, enclosed by a fence, be locked and. not open to the public to use except by a permit. - The proposal is recognizing that the soccer fields are in the City of Maplewood and that by -agreement. specified use could be given to the. City of Maplewood when and haw many soccer fields could be used by residents. Mr. Bierscheid: said the soccer fields will be maintained by the City of St. Paul, there would be specified hours of operation, be no festivals, there is no lighting proposed, and there would. be a specified limited number of youth tournaments by agreement. Another reason there. is a need for the security of the fencing, locked gates, single access and the supervision on site is to control the overuse of the soccer fields. Mr..* Tim. Agness, the Principal Designer 'for the Parks & Recreation department for the City of St. Paul, addressed the commission. He said when thisroposal was -presented to p p .the neighbors in 2001., the residents said they did not want a trail connection or -play area. Those . items have been removed from this proposal. He said there are alternatives that have been offered by the water utility for additional parking. At this point and time, the research they have done across the country show this number of parking spaces would exceed the number of spaces. necessary for these s.ix soccer fields. When parking problem's occur it's usually because of .a scheduling problem. They hired a-geo-technical .firm called American Engineering- and Testing to do soil borings in 2001,to see how these lime pits would be. managed. Currently, the water utilit Y is driving on areas that were once lime. The water is- compressed and eventually it ends up stable. He said they were told the land would never beperfectly stable and there would be some continuous differential settlement unless the drainage as it is ona' really good .athletic field. There was a study done by the water utility in 1995, which covered, case' -histories and- abandoned lime pits. They would try to plant trees that are 2 to 21/2i nch caliber like those planted on boulevards. The.trees have to be lime tolerant and would have to have enough fill to be .able to care forthe root system. Commissioner Monahan-Junek said.she read a residents concern regarding: what other areas the applicant has checked into to. build these six soccer fields. She. said maybe there aren't any areas large enough? Mr.. Bierscheid said. they have checked -extensively throughout St. Paul and there are no other areas.to build this proposal. He said the land is owned by the.water utility and whenthe land became available they proposed to build this soccer complex there. In St. Paul, four soccer fields is the most that could. be- built. Commissioner Trippler asked Mr. Bierscheid what the Cit of St. Paul was going to do with the Y g 9 land at the. Pig's Eye site? Mr. Bierscheid said the Pig's Eye site is part of the regional park plan and for the most part that is to remain a large open space area. He said, there is a slightly different environment at Pig's Eye the`n.there is at Sandy Lake. Commissioner Trippler said he was the project -manager for the Pig's Eyearea five or six years' ago. He knows there were plans to put soccer fields.in there but.District One.was opposed to the soccer fields being put there for various reasons.. He said- one reason was because it obstructed District Ones view'of.the river. He believes that sight would be perfect for soccer fields. He does not understand. why the City of St. Paul does not pursue that area. further. This. is where the population lives that needs these soccer fields. Mr:' Bierscheid said they won't put soccer fields there because of the environmental- concerns and native species. The primary reason is they do.'not want todisturb the land. Comm.issionerTripplersaid he vehemently disagrees. There are no native species left there: He said the land isn't virgin, it's. an old dumpsite. The Pollution Control Agency along with the help of the EPA is removing all of. the toxic materials off the site and when they are done it won't be the problem it was five years ago.. Mr. Bierscheid said the intention of this proposal is for the soccer youth. They are desperately trying,, to find soccer fields for youth organizations to use. Commissioner Mueller said the. applicant stated a. St. Paul Park & 'Recreationp erson would supervise this complex and it is funded by .the City of St. Paul. He asked. if there has. been conversation regarding the residents of Maplewood and St.. Paul sharin the use of this com lex? _ g p Mr. Bierscheid said yes, St. Paul will be supervising this com lex and it is funded by St. Paul. He p hopes the two cities could. reach an agreement about the use of this p com lex. either for a specified time or for a certain number of days. Commissioner Mueller. stated the 'resid.ents are. afraid their homes will o down in value if this g. soccer complex is built. Mr. Bierscheid said in his ' 35� years of experience, he has seen property values not only p p Y Y maintained but they have gone up when next to a park. Commissioner Mueller asked Mr. Bierscheid if the Cit of St. Paul was bearin this cost and what _ Y g would this project cost? Mr. Bierscheid said the ro'ect would cost $7-mil.lion dollars. The cost would -be'covered b the p 1Y City of St. Paul and by Ramsey County in terms of development costs.'. Commissioner Mueller asked if this soccer complex is completely fenced, and his back y and backs - p p Y Y up to this area would he be able to go play on these fields, or is that not a possibility? Mr. Bierscheid said . that depends on whatever the City of Maplewood sets for conditions and access.to the property for the residents. Commissioner Mueller asked what. if one of the conditions was to eliminate one of the soccer fields in order to putin a picnic ' area and tot lot? Mr. Bierscheid said they would like to have as many soccer fields' as possible. He said the would be willing to discuss having only five soccer fields and before it's finalized they would hope to come to some kind of agreement. Chairperson Fischer asked audience members to sign in on, si n u sheet if the would like to g g p Y speak.. They would-be called up to -speak -in the. order they sign up. She asked speakers to keep their comments to five minutes or less in length. She also said neighbors should have respect for g others and their. opinions. The following people- gave their comments: I. Travis. Gaueberg at 167 East Skillman Avenue;: Maplewood He said he has a young son and plans on having more children. He does not believe thisp lan . can handle the parking. for this proposal. There is not a direct connection to this area and people will drive through neighborhoods looking for shortcuts. He said the community -is ve rY quiet and they would like to keep it that way. People would be driving fast and he is concerned about the safety of children. He believes that the restroom s are too far from the soccer fields. Because of this he is concerned that adults who have been .drinking beverag es all afternoon wiil..not walk to the bathroom but will urinate onhis property. When he bought his property four years ago Sandy Lake wase considered open space. He was told it wasn't going to be developed into anything- and . g g p .that is why he liked this area. The park nearest to him is a few blocks away and it attracts some shady characters. Because of this he will never take his g family there again, He believes developing this soccer .complex will attract trouble and he doesn't want it in his backyard. He wants the planning commission to vote no on this. proposal. 2. John Chapman at 160 County. Road B East, Maplewood He isnot in complete opposition of this proposal. Many of the changes that were made in earlier Plans appear to be made to benefit the residents south, of the project. He does not want the concerns of the people.north of the project ignored.. He has concerns about the screenin of the. 9 area to ' the- north. as well as the increased traffic on County Road B East. Between the two schools, St. Jude Medical and the new' -Joe's Sporting Goods being built there, is. a lot of traffic throughout certain times of the day on County. Road B-, 3. John Hackman at 2011 Jackson Street, Maplewood He has lived. here for 17 years. His neighborhood has put up"ith a lot from the water utility as far as.building the.dikes, and repositioning the ponds to the west of him. He's* had to live through. troubles with Sandy Lake. Sandy Lake had to. be -pumped out and there wereenerators runnin g g all night. When they .were building the dikes. he lived with constant noise and he had nails popping out of the.walls in. his house, which he had to repair. When he comes home he finally has peace and quiet and he enjoys this. The Business Centers by the highway. buffer the highway noise. Because of everything he has put up he would like to Leave it open space so he can continue to enjoy his peace and quiet. He is. against this proposal. 4. Joe Plumbo at 176 East Skillman Avenue, Maplewood He comes before the planning commission to ask that they vote no for this proposal. He sent a Fetter -to the city with his concerns and. comments. Because of the problems over the decades that this neighborhood has had to endure, -it is time to give- some consideration to this neighborhood to finally enjoy some peace and quiet and be left alone. The soccer fields will not provide peace and quiet but will cause. problems and bring increased traffic down County Road B East. The neighborhood went before the parks commission last year and they decided to take no. action, which he .believes was a .good decision. The neighborhood wants Sandy Lake to be capped and Left as open space. 5. Shelly.Strauss. at 2153 Arkwright Street, Maplewood She said- her neighborhood wasn't notified or.surveyed for this proposal. The traffic would come through her neighborhood and this concerns her. This is a proposal.for a regional center for the residents of St. Paul and secondly for the residents of Maplewood. She believes the parking is not ample enough for this proposal. 235 spaces .is not. enough for six soccer fields,. the home team, visiting team, and other spectators besides the overlapping of soccer games. Ms. Strauss said -once the parking spaces are full. people areoin to ark in the closest g g P neighborhood. Eventually someone will cut.a whole in the fence so people. can gain access and get in faster. She believes that even though there are no plans. for lighting at this time in Phase I, .the games are. 1'/2 hour long. and. eventually the applicant will come back and ask. for lighting to be added. She is against this proposal. 6. Dorothy Haas at 129 Bellwood Avenue, Maplewood She -is concerned about the screening. along the fenced. area. In St. Paul,- 30g ears ago., there Y was a rape that occurred .at a park off of Maryland- Avenue and Rice Street where there was also screening. That screening has since been removed due to the rape occurring. She said the problems associated with screening is just something to think about regarding this proposal. She g g p ro p is concerned abouttne wildlife that will be disturbed in the area. When they moved here 30 years ago they had deer go through their property and she is concerned the wildlife.will disappear.. She isagainst this. proposal. 7. Pete Frank. at 1921 Price Avenue, Maplewood He said he is speaking in favor of this g proposal. He's dealt. with traveling soccer and the' fall. .soccer program a great deal. Parking is basically not a problem but there have been.ahandful of problems on the weekends. When parking is, a.problem it is usually because of poor scheduling.. Kids games are usually 1 hourlong, in the'fall the games start at 6:00 .m. and the second game. p g starts.:at 7:00 p.m. so the kids are usually done playing around- 8:.00 p.m. The older kids will need fields. that. are lit fora their- games. Most fields do not .have I -i hts, basically because of the. -added g Y cost and to keep -the use of the fields down. Hazelwood Park is one of the few parks .that have lit fields. Soccer games are quieter than baseball games or others sports that are being played. Six p gp Y soccer fields is the ideal number as shown on this proposal. Property values do not decrease and if anything, they increase. Although he said he is not an -expert, expert, he has. heard that living b a school or by a park will increase the value of your property. 8.. Larry Peterson at 351 O'Day Street South, Maplewood HeJs speaking in favor of this proposal. He has two daughters and they have been involved in playing soccer for District 622 ,and the Northeast, Soccer Association. He credits. the self-. confidence and,good. grades of his children because of their involvement in youth. activities. He does. not live near this location but does live in south. Maplewood.He lives by the Ramsey County Workhouse. There is a nine -hole golf course being built .there, which -will be run by the Ramsey County Workhouse inmates. His neighborhood supported that project for the better of. the' neighborhood and he believes the residents should support this project for their neighborhood as well. 9. Rob- McHattie at 1412 Almond Avenue, St. Paul He is the Chairman .for SoccerSpaces. - He- has been involved in finding places for kids to play soccer for about five years now and his kids have played soccer for. about. fifteen.years. Sandy Lake is the ideal site because the land is inexpensive -,.it really can't be used for anything else, the Y g soccer fields can be shared by multiple communities and it. does not effect a huge. amount. of homes. He said if this space is left as open space there is only a small amount of people that would enjoy this open ' space. Mr. McHattie said if the soccer complex is built, there could be'600 people enjoying this space daily. There could be parking problems on the weekend .but it is possible to have overflow parking at a nearby school or at the industrial area. They .like this site because there is space for six soccer fields, which is critical for getting..teams from neighboring cities to compete there. They have looked at other sites as well as the Pig's Eye site but there is not enough space to have six soccer fields at any other location. 1-0. Sean Nicholson at 2381 Chippewa Circle, Maplewood. He supports the soccer proposal. He grew.up playing soccer for a great coach Buzz Lagos and as: 'a .result he has been involved in soccer 'his . whole life.' He is the past president of the Northeast Soccer Association; which is the home team for the Maplewood commun.it Y .. They are probably the ones that use the Hazelwood Park- soccer field the most. He is here representing .a few soccer clubs. Twin City Fire has about 200 youth players, St. Paul Black Hawks have about 500 players and there is another club that has 400 players. They al*llay a ainst each other. p g They have a hard time finding soccer fields to play at and many times they have to travel to Blaine to find available soccer fields. There is usually one tournament a year..He said Soccer is the fastest growing sport in- America. .This is anopportunity to get .a $7 million park in their backyard. There is not a lot of noise from soccer. The kids are. running and don't have the energy to yell and. scream. He would .love to have this beautiful park in ,his backyard for the kids and the'community to,use. 1.1. Don Lubke at 1.825 Hyacinth Avenue, St. Paul He is the president of the Northeast Soccer Association. The. number of soccer fields do not correspond with the number of kids playing soccer. The kids don't have. enough places to play soccer at. If you are a young family with children buying a home by parks and schools would draw families to those neighborhoods. The wildlife will stay and will continue to grow with. the trees and. ponds. He is in favor of this proposal. 12..Sharell Babin at 150 East County Road- B, Maplewood They. bought their house many years ago when before Cub Foods was. there it was a riding stable. Sandy Lake was low enough that they could look out their house and see onto Skillman Avenue.. They would call the water utility and ask what was going on only to be told not to worry that nothing was going on and her family was strung along for years.. Then the -dikes were built and Sandy .Lake became so..high that. you cannot see across to the other side anymore.. They have lost a lot since they moved. there. St. Jude's built and their road comes out directly. onto hers and they get -the traffic from St. Jude's along with the shift changes, traffic from Cub, traffic from ,the two schools and now they want to add the traffic for the soccer fields. The entrance to. the -soccer complex is proposed to be only two doors down from her house and it will bring problems and elements to their. neighborhood that they don't want. They want to come home to peace and quiet and enjoy their neighborhood and not to deal with traffic and noise. She.wants. : the planning commission to vote no for this -proposal.. 13. Milo Thompson at 1794 Onacrest Avenue, Maplewood His sources state that. Sandy Lake has to be capped. The water utility would like financial help in, covering the cost. - There is a conditional use permit mentioned here. This CUP comes up for an annual review- and the residents could come back:to the city with their protests through the -year and get the problems resolved if any were to occur. The residents still have avenues to be in control of their neighborhoods. 14. Manuel (Buzz) Lagos at 1889, Lincoln Avenue, St. Paul He is the coach of the. Minnesota Thunder Soccer team. 'He does soccer clinics in Maplewood and works with soccer clubs and the schools.. Living in St. Paul he recognizes the need for soccer fields for the youth of today to play soccer. Being a homeowner, he knows that people have the, to be concerned about their property if a soccer complex was .proposed to be .built. This. would a very nice complex, it would keep the wildlife, it would be maintained very -nice and be aesthetically pleasing and it would overall enhance property values. The parking and traffic problems can be addressed and can be. minimized. The fields will be managed properly and the use of the six soccer fields could be.rotated to help save the fields. 15. Aaron Tilsen at. 6097 Courtly Alcove, Woodbury He coaches soccer for about 150 to. 200 kids and 10 to 20 of -those kids are from Maplewood'.' They run into this. issue of using soccer fields and how many kids do you have to have on a team in order to use their city's soccer fields. For the last four years he worked at the indoor soccer facility on Cope Avenue. At Harvest Park they put a soccer field in at the. arkThe ran soccer. p Y camps there but -now it has been rented out to Hispanics and the soccer field has been destroyed. That is what will happen to Hazelwood Park. because there is no lace to o to . p g practice soccer. In St. Paull almost all. the parks are set up for baseball and softball and there are very few soccer parks. If Maplewood. does. not allow St. Paul. tout in these soccer. fields, ,. Maplewood's parks . wil.l be over used and destroyed.. Every year. the ' Park . and Recreation Department spends a lot of money fixing the soccer fields up.'.. Building these soccer fields would take some use off of Maplewood's parks. He. is for this proposal. 16'. Joel Hollenkamp at 1984 Adolphus Street, Maplewood His concern is the traffic flow.. He feels, with only one entrance/exiteo le will use County. Road B. p p Y East and any other street people can gain the. quickest access they will use. There will be a lot of congestion no matter how much time .you put in between the game times. He is also concerned .about the noise level. Since the concrete wall was put. up by the freeway the noise does not bother him. He appreciates the- opinions of -the. people who'are for the soccerp ark but none of them live in this area so it is easy ,for them to be in favor of it. 17.. Joanne Ronning at* 144 East Skillman Avenue, Maplewood-*. She is confused. because they were told the. soccer, fields would be used for adult soccer9 ames and for tournament plan and. now she hears the kids have no place to play and the fields would be used for youth soccer..Their neighborhood signed a petition with over 100 names on it stating.. 'that they don't want this soccer complex. here. She, wants Sandy Lake to be capped and then left as open space. She read St. Paul does not want anything less than six soccer fields so you are not going to get them to go down to five soccer fields.. 'Hazelwood Park originally did not have lighting on it but it was installed. She thinks the same.thing would happena't this complex, it is. just a matter of time. At a meeting in the fall of 2001 at the Parkside Fire Department, there was a Maplewood Policeman there and he said. there would not be extra police patrol if this Sandy Lake soccer field were built. There is increased concern for kids. to congregate therewith or without a fence. Property values are another concern of hers. Having a park in someone's. neighborhood with a picnic area and swings is far more desirable then having six soccer fields in their neighborhood with. soccer tournaments being played all the time. Ms. Ronning said it also seems ridiculous to have only one bathroom for thisro osal' with. 600 p p pe.ople'there at one time: If someone from the city council lived in this neigh borhood-v she does not believe this proposal would even be heard. She. is not. in favor of this proposal and urges the planning commission to vote no. 17. Charles Gershner at 176Mount Vernon, Maplewood He understands that St. Paul Regional .Water owns the land right now and wondered who would be -responsible for capping Sandy Lake once the contaminants were covered over with fill -and grass?. Mr. Anderson said St. Paul Regional Water would still own the land and the City of St. Paul would be responsible for the property. 18. Brett Looney at .1985 Jackson Street, Maplewood A lot of. people walk through his neighborhood and. he has concerns about the traffic especially with children around. He is concerned about.kids sitting in the parking- lot causin trouble and a. g 9 police patrol comes .and the kids. run over the fence and into their neighborhoods. People will. be in a hurry and. may, drive through the neighborhoods fast trying to et to the kids soccer games. rY g 9 Say. people' are lost, they will drive fast.through the. neighborhoods looking -for the entrance to the soccer complex because they are late.. There are kids playin in the streets all year round. He is g Y against this proposal. If this happens -to get passed he wants to make sure -the city considers the neighborhoods surrounding it. .18. -Steven Condiff at 1.33 Skillman Avenue, Maplewood. He was one of the 'spearheads. on the last rejection for thisp pro osal last time. He thinks this will . turn into a money making proposition. He has watched his community .mmunit row and the neighborhood enjoys the peace quiet despite the noise of the freeway. The vegetation-. and the buildings help drown. out the noise of the freeway. He has heard the Pros and cons of this proposal but these people don't live in. this area. The, M PCA told people that Sandy Lake has to be capped no matter what and eventually. somethingwill grow on the land once it is made into an open space.. Soccer is a great sport but. not in his backyard. He is against this proposal and he g P p would like to --keep -it quiet. 19. Peter Fischer at 2443 Stan' dridge Avenue, Maplewood. He is in support of .this proposal. He believes the City of St. Paul has .taken into consideration a lot of the concerns from the neighborhood and the citizens, .which are now'reflected in the p lans. He knows there is a shortage. of soccer fields in -the community. There are many programs that are,offered by.St.' .Paul that Maplewood take advantage of. Thisro osal is not only a benefit for p P Y St. Paul but surrounding- communities as well.. The applicant seems very open to suggestions and has concerns about the needs of the .neighbors. Many times there are developments. that are built and the developers only have concerns for themselves and not for the residents. Commissioner Rossbach asked staff if they hada chance to et an answer to his question earlier g regarding the mining ordinance? Mr: Ekstrand said the city did approve a conditional use permit (CU*P)*for the removal of time from the lime pits. in .the late -.80's, which .expired 12-1-01. In .1997 the city council did approve a landscape plan for the southerly part of the property. Commissioner Rossbach said the.St. Paul Water Utility -has -an obligation to restore the site in its 9 entirety whether there is a soccer field built or not. He said there must be some criteria that the restoration is defined in one-way or another. Mr. Ekstrand said he would'continue to study this. Commissioner Trippler said in most of the cap -ping regulations it rarely limits it to just cappin . There are engineering and aesthetic considerations in any capping order that is put out. He can't imagine that the MPGA- would say to pave over it. It will. have to have. a. certain amount ofg rowth material, clay for imperviousness and possibly an 18 -inch zone of rooting soils. He asked staff if the city will see any tax revenues. from this proposal as opposed to an open space proposal? p p p Melinda Coleman said the .city will not see any tax revenue from the St. Paul Water Utility. County Government is tax-exempt whether it is. left open space or not. Commissioner Pearson asked where the closest playground is in that neighborhood? Mr. Anderson said: Western Hills Park is the closest playground, which is about 3 blocks away. .Commissioner Rossbach said the commission does not9 9 et a regular audience and he said he . usually-, sticks his foot in his.. mouth once during a meeting. He would vote no on thisproposal because the people say they don't want the complex built. -One of his main driving criteria is the planning commission should listen to the voices of the residents whenever it isp ossible.. The planning commission is limited.in many developments because they don't have a lot of choices. He would further say .that he thinks. -the residents are "blowin . it".. This would be a reat use. 9 9. From his own experience from living. across the street from Hazelwood Park, there are the largest baseball and soccer fields.there, he lives on the count road that carries way more traffic then -the Y Y area for this. proposal and the biggest problem is listening -to softballs being hit against steel .bats. None of this is really a "problem". He. never hears the soccer field noise.. Onl on occasion is there a parking problem. The biggest parking problem �s for the 4 of July celebration when there are. 10,000 plus people there. He thinks the residents are making. a big. mountain out of a tiny molehill. This is a very minimal use and the residents are turning it down.. The residents would rather have an area that is going to get capped, filled in and sod put on top to look.at rather than an area of 400 feet of trees blocking the neighborhood from seeing six soccer fields. He thinks by the time the residents go to the public hearing for the city council on March 10th the residents should reconsider this proposal. Commissioner Mueller said personally he would vote yes for this proposal. When there is a 310- foot.sound barrier of trees around this -area he would take it. The freeway is his backyard and he­ hears the freeway noise. Someone, wrote a letter to the planning commission asking if this. proposal was in your backyard would you want it there? He said he sure would want that proposal in his .backyard'. It's a great proposal and the value of his home would skyrocket.. It is a value to the community as well not only for Maplewood -but other surrounding -communities. Chairperson Fischer asked staff what kind of screening is around thearks in Maplewood such p p as Goodrich Park? ..Mr. Anderson said the s creening is minimal at.Goodrich Park. Some parks are surrounded by residential homes. Commissioner Monahan-Junek said when she saw thisro osal with a 310 -foot buffer of trees. p p she said she thought it was fabulous. She said'go to other communities .and many people don't get that kind of a buffer. It bothers her that most of the dialogue is that we .haven't one beyond9 your own" interest and started thinking about the. "communities interest". Her child takes swimming lessons at Sky -view School in Oakdale but she lives in Maplewood, should she.not be going there because she doesn't- live in Oakdale? A -lot of people have asked, "would you want this proposal built in your backyard"? She said yes, she lives on Larpenteur Avenue between Century Avenue and McKnight Road. She said there is traffic from Hill Murray School, from 3M and the road is very busy. She, made the decision to not let her child play on the road because it is note safe. She made the *decision that her child only plays in her yard. She is careful driving and she watches the traffic. She empathizes with the residents. The fact is that times have - changed and if she had a choice to have soccer fields across the street from her house instead of the Maplewood Apartments she would rather have the soccer fields. She feels this is a fabulous opportunity for the community. She said everyone would like peace and quiet, but the community is changing. She said if it wasn't for places like 3M, Maplewood. Mall, and recreation areas, it would not be a thriving community. She supports this plan. Commissioner Trippier moved to adopt the resolution on page 45 approving a comprehensive land. use plan amendment from. OS (open space) to P (park) for -the City of St. Paul's proposed Sandy -Lake Soccer. Complex. Approval is based on the following reasons: 1.- The. proposed soccer, complex would conform with Maplewood's mission to provide, a. comprehensive, balanced and sustainable system of parks, open spaces/natural areas, trails . and leisure -oriented activities/programs for city residents to use and enjoy in as cost-effective manner as possible. 2.- It would: provide city residents with. parks and natural . areas for recreational uses as visual/physical diversions from the hard surfacing a urban. development and as -a means to maintain the character, ambience,. appearance and a sense .of open space. 3. It would maximize the recreational opportunities available to city .residents through the development of fair an.d equitable working partnerships. between the city and the local school district, adjacent cities, county, churches and. civic' organizations: 4. It - would provide city residents with. an interconnected trail. system for transportation an.d . recreation purposes and as- a means to tie divergent parks and _open space with the broader community. 5. It would convert an unattractive and unusable lime pit to an attractive and useable park. Z. It would ' provide relief for existing soccer fields that are heavily used. 7. It would create and foster a -cooperative working relationship with the City of St. Paul and Ramsey County. 8.. It would serve as a regional recreational .facility that would serve many communities. Commissioner Trippler moved to adopt the resolution on pages 46-48 approving a conditional use permit for the Sandy Lake Soccer Complex.* Approval is based on the f findings required by code and.subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed site plan shall be submitted to. the*city for approval. - All construction shall follow the approved. site plan.. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2.. The proposed construction must.be substantially started within one year of council approval' or the permit shall become null and void. 3. The city .council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant shall submit detailed plans that include, but are not limited to, the following: • A detailed landscape and tree -buffer plan with quantities, sizes, species- and locations. • A .detailed grading, drainage, erosion control and utility plan. The utility plan must show how sanitary waste would be removed from the restroom bu.ilding. • Storm run-off calculations. A site plan that provides setback dimensions, the location of trails, parking -lot dimensions and the location'of any fences. • A trail connection to the corner of Adolphus Street and Skillman, Avenue. A right -turn lane into the proposed site. • Showing an. area for "proof -of -parking" shou.Id the proposed 235 spaces be insufficient. • Post, noparking" signs within the main driveway.., • Revise the plans to show a five -field soccer complex with the field space closest to the restroom building reserved for development as.a neighborhood park with picnic facilities, tot ..lot, swing sets,. etc. The revised site plan. should include a paved -bike path around the perimeter of the site. • Widening the driveway entrance to 26-32 feet. • Provision of a gate at the driveway. entrance. 5.. Site -lighting. shall not be allowed for night play. Staff may approve security lighting. if it is found to be. needed by the police. chief for security reasons. 6. Parke maintenance shall be provided by the City of St. Paull 7. - No festivals shall be held. at this soccer park. Youth tournaments are allowed. l .8. The applicant shall be responsible for. locking the gate each evening. 9. The- applicant shall also submit a program identif yi.n the hours of use, the teams or groups . Y 9 g p using this facility and their ages They shall also submit the. management plan for the facility as.well as. a plan for enforcement should there be any problems. Commissioner Mueller. seconded. Chairperson Fischer took a vote on the Comprehensive Land Use Amendment with the conditions outlined on page 6 of the staff report. Ayes — Fischer, Monahan-Junek, Mueller, Trippler Nays— Pearson, Rossbach The motion passed 4-2. Chairperson Fischer took a vote on the Conditional Use Permit. with the conditions outlined on. pages 6 and 7 of. the staff report. Ayes - Fischer, Monahan-Junek, Mueller, Trippler Nays - Pearson, Rossbach The motion passed 4-2. This item goes to the city council. March 10,. 2003. Name (first & last) please print A "OG xv 0 All -7 Address zp IDZ. IOOF 14. AGENDA ITEM r AGENDA REPORT Act, ty TO: Richard Fursman City Manager er1---- FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Legacy Village at Maplewood (Hajicek Property),Ci Pro`ect02-18-- . , City � Resolution Receiving Responses to Comments on Alternative Urban Areawide Review AUAR and Calling a Public Hearing DATE: March 3, 2003 " Introduction On November 26, 2002, the city council authorized the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawi de Review (AUAR) of the Hajicek property in north Maplewood for a mixed land -use development proposal. The AUAR was approved for p . pp publication and responses were received from various individuals and agencies. A resolution receiving those comments and the sresponses onses is q p appropriate; along with calling a public hearing for March 24, 2003, to officially adopt t the final AUAR (FAUAR) document and mitigation plan. Background The Hartford Group has proposed development of the Hajicek site in north Maplewood with a mixture of single-family, senior housing,, high-density residential property, retailproperty, medical office and . ,, corporate office property. The proposed mixed-use development is consistent with theg oals of the comprehensive plan for this area of the city. The attached drawing shows a draft concept for the proposed development. The AUAR was published in the EQB Monitor on January 6, 2003, as Y required b statute. A minimum a 30 -day comment period was required, although additional comments were received after the 30 days. These comments are included in the attached information. The consultant hired b Hartford Group is Y p SRF Consulting, Inc. SRF has prepared the AUAR document and provided their responses to each of the comments received. Staff has reviewed the responses and agrees with the recommended response. The approved process has the city receiving the responses and comments on March 10 2003, and calling a public hearing for March 24, 2003. The public hearing will be the city's authorization to release the AUAR-and mitigation plan. State agencies and the Metropolitan Council g p cel have 10 days from receipt of the final AUAR and mitigation plan to object if they believe the document to be inaccurate or incomplete. Final adoption of the AUAR and mitigation plan would occur on the second meeting of April 2003. The AUAR is an extensive review of the environmental impacts of thero osed development. The p p p following page includes a number of -the specific impacts identified as noted in the original AUAR review document. , The AUAR provides a mitigation plan that the council, actin the Regulatory g as g ry Governmental Unit (RGU), will be considering for adoption on March 24. The EQBg uidelines for an AUAR state: "It must be understood that the mitigation plan in the final document takes',on the nature of a commitment by the RGU (City Council) to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects. It is more than just a list of ways to reduce impacts — it must include information about how the mitigation will be applied and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the A UAR may not be adequate and/or specific projects may lose their exemption from individual review. If City Council Agenda Report AUAR For Legacy Village At Maplewood March 3, 2003 Page Two AUAR Summary Development scenario includes 318 units of multi -family townhomes; 244 units of multi -family row houses; 88 units of multi -family residential; 200 units of senior housing; 7.3 acres of retail/ restaurant; 9.8 acres of commercial/office; 3.1 acres of medical office; and 9.8 acres of green/ public space. Proposed construction of the development is assumed to begin during spring of 2003 and anticipated completion is 2006. The traffic analysis indicates that the extension of County Road D west from Hazelwood Street must be installed for roadway impacts from the development to be mitigated. An extension of Kennard Street north from Beam is also required. Future improvements to White Bear Avenue, as recommended in the Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study, will be needed to mitigate area traffic growth and to solve the long-standing Mall area traffic problems. The White Bear Avenue -improvements are not a required mitigation listed within the AUAR but will continue to be a high priority due to development and growth -related traffic impacts. •Sanitary sewer capacity is adequate in local sewers; however, the site is proposed to generate more flow than allocated by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and further discussions are needed to increase Maplewood's allocation of flow. • Water supply is adequate if a 12 -inch water main is extended from TH 61 alongthe existing g County Road D alignment as recommended by the TH 61/County Road D (Hillcrest Animal Hospital) Water Study in 2002. • A comprehensive storm water plan will be required as part of the development process. The development will be required to limit post -development runoff to pre -development levels using g -infiltration and storm ponds on-site. No new storm water infrastructure is anticipated off site. • Significant tree removal is anticipated due to project development and grading. The developer has proposed that existing trees be "...evaluated by an urban forester to identify important specimens that should be preserved and/or existing trees that could be relocated within the development using a tree spade." • The DNR has noted that areas of the development have habitat similar to that preferred by the Blanding's turtle, a species listed as threatened in Minnesota, but no Blanding's turtles have been observed on the site. The DNR notes that the project site is not designated as an area of statewide importance for Blanding's turtle and no impact is anticipated. • Wetland impact is anticipated on the site. A total of six wetlands were identified during the site review. Attached is a map from the AUAR document that identifies Wetlands A through F. Wetlands A and B are proposed to be filled and mitigated within the site. The drainage ditch connecting to Wetland C will be filled and mitigated. All mitigation will be proposed on the project. The development is not proposed to impact the main basin of Wetland C, and is not proposed to impact Wetlands D, E or F, although the requirement to realign County Road D will likely impact Wetland D. That wetland impact will be covered in the EAW being prepared for the County Road D extension project.. Wetland buffer requirements have been identified and are proposed to be implemented. Storm water will be required to be pre-treated before discharge to the wetlands. City Council Agenda Report AUAR For Legacy Village At Maplewood March 3, 2003 . Page Three A study of the air quality in the area indicates that no problems are anticipated. • A study of the noise in the area indicates that the northern -most portion of the site does not currently meet state nighttime noise standards due to the 1-694 freeway noise.. The residential units will be required to be designed to minimize noise impacts by providing climate -controlled units, increasing wall insulation and by providing common areas within the building courtyards. • The need for increased fire and police protection is identified within the AUAR. The fire and police departments have determined that the proposed development will likely require two police officers based upon 0.5 officers per 1000 people and fire has estimated a need for eight new firefighters/paramedics throughout the city, of which two may need to be dedicated to this development. Additional study of financial commitment of the development's related tax base toward police and fire protection will occur as part of the PUD and Tax Abatement hearings. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution that receives the comments and responses for the AUAR, for the Legacy Village at Maplewood and calls a public hearing for March 24, 2003, for the purpose of adopting the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan. RCA jW Attachments: Draft Concept Plan Wetland Map Schedule Resolution o. o Q N w� cli Z I � Oto r { .r, N EL' W t 1 cc -- L.I m = ct �p . ♦ \ - lep > to y�^C Ll S. O Z c!) acs•?LF— C4 im Him t L t Nq�NJ1 t o It j z LU -0Wa I Betz_ -N d r�J� WaA� { • I f .o CCS 4 �ct VJ ct r __q cd T{ O s� cU o� i0 r: x�iMtR : � p•�•�♦O�O•�l - ,;,rte �,�.,r+�:-o:,—�,;s.a_ !♦•• P-<'�.a�'� `-SES! � �• - • �♦��`���•i+�•♦io� - •._.,� . • _;;.�.:- .� .ori :x.,_..-�i...�;..:«;;.: • .• � _ � s� �� � ,� ` bra=;". - • ��;... ,. S' `► ��•1.�.. .ts • :cam.-''r„'�-'{��^1�-r-,'`�'lr"F�''-;'�i•2 �•�1 �el:�ll,�•,. -.•ct - :Il'1:••s1�-r 17711l1� 1 ...y�•.MF�•Y `.`'3�. �• / �j a��. > yrs r .. •� -w , y •♦ 0� qtr •sr::;:r �' ♦♦ ♦ ► • ♦•fit _ c '_Y,t - RE C t♦ • •♦•♦Q♦.♦•♦♦♦ sf O•♦•e9 _ oil •o••♦•Aft•♦.• ♦ ♦ • e • • e .Il�♦�,t X40♦���e�.�•9Vl •b1♦♦O.f�♦•♦4 ♦♦ a� ♦ O 1 e J a ► 6 ♦ y f • • ♦ ♦�`♦� o ���♦�♦♦♦♦ ►•`• . •o•�e•e♦ M1. _dam ►O•♦•. f �b�i•••••♦•vat •,- sc 4�'- ♦ • • • r. • • v e, t �t31t.:�;1 x•f-'�'�_ _r.v=t' t ' , r >::. •; ►e♦♦♦e♦�G�e♦•O6♦ ���,�Lt�m!ji'�°3�r.�y�''�ayM%t_..:(f�=titi,:...��1� •0�����1 Oe.f••• a• c;...,�._a�^iad:.t._•�„•�..:i� •.. ,yJLt:i;c-�='i'Lw?''.��j• o�`'�c!'•,•. ►OCe•C`01♦ete0♦e� ♦•♦•♦•♦f• • .r. r_. ^�ri... ✓;;:iC i:.r..,rt..J�.i • �+i�f�4-�^•" < i% ~`��`ti...� • �.. a. e 10 ♦. � .. 'd.,,�n i'i`:°'�1•fF'rr�';-.r}r _ 'r� : �7 -��.ir."r•r';t -N'i .,. t :c:�t. •t. be ♦ e � •♦e4♦• i i�•,["1• ,.�;y��':iT.'_; 4fl✓.t�>l4-'�'•�1.'a..�.�ti:7w �" .1.- a ♦.+t♦4 � •7�1',"'. 4h•: l,ol:: ��•ham' •.fie •t �c3•;'t,'fj•7i5r•.� V,•i°`i1lT�:y:1� :,. •.?C'i�4taji U`yie tt iti . • •o � �"Tassts_ _� �i�`�•'i��_`.* �;'.�a..1 3�,,�t . ho ��-.rX,yr3^+,vet! !ci'�c+rr,i.:;:i�s�'L1'1�: '.2.8.., ��r,-.f,"=t �♦�� ♦4 4 aay��ci£t`j: �•13:1'sfi t.4ifa�ii'f!`•�9a> ♦'♦•♦.�•�•CO�I 4ifr�-tea ti`"'moi ,r •� :•. ,t � P �b i�:�Ztsr'.Fcr�i�,tL• s'r'_•s.••.:"�•�i'°!'v.<'c`�c�i;��'L�'j:il�' I♦•♦e♦• ��`.♦� i♦♦C - . `� Rifi (Nib':'• ,*�., t .I�� �♦r'�♦♦♦♦♦e♦�♦•1►� i - :M�rr��t{":i�ref. _:s.'�*ti,t`��tYJ"-',ir...j?(� •♦:�:♦.i � � ►•♦•♦•♦•♦ ♦•r•♦•♦• ♦♦�i�e�t�1 �a.✓�'�'{tet, `� �' • J,+ � o �%'i 'i •l4♦•♦♦♦♦e�♦•♦•♦♦e4♦•�. � +• •� �' d'i1r:•es�1}bt2`• a: -"" . ■ ;��f i'cL; its.! 11 Ate} i �i tO n i iPEh�'•1'� � ! NO 1 _ � a • ► . `� � ;.�®• ate. i G � fr -b I sye�•���•� .'moo.♦e .•. ♦ ♦ e •� e e � • ,�•♦i�i!Pi♦.`ice. oma•+�♦y♦�♦�ON • a+����� ♦ • ♦ a ��e�eo•e.�.�f. �i�i�i � ire': � LSA♦•♦O♦♦� �•♦♦♦• ♦♦•� mot.. ULO O i Q$ J O �jJJ1 N Z9 ri R I C 0 HARTFORD SITE PROPOSAL W/ COUNTY ROAD D EXTENSION PROJECT TIME LINE PLAN February 28, 2003 Critical Items/Tasks Alignment Study Task Force City Council Auth Prep of AUAR Draft AUAR to City Staff Planning Commission — Rvw of Align Study Final Roadway Align Study to Council Roadway Align Public Hearing @Council AUAR to Council AUAR Notice Published in EQB Monitor County Rd D EAW Approve Publish County Rd D EAW Publish in EQB AUAR Comment Period Ends Tax Abatement Info to Council AUAR Responses Prepared Hartford Plans Submitted for Review Planning Comm — Rvw AUAR and EAW EAW Comment Period Ends Council Calls Hearing on AUAR and EAW Review of Development Issues City Council —Pub Hearing — AUAR & EAW Planning Comm —ROW Map — Cty Rd D City Council - ROW Map-Cty Rd D Planning Commission Reviews Prel Plat, Land .Use Plan Amend, PUD Zone Change and Trans Plan Amend Design Rvw Committee Reviews Bldg Design Details Council Adopts Final AUAR w/Mitigation Plan and Holds Tax Abatement Public Hearing , Council Receives Prel Report on. Cty Rd ID City Council Holds Public Hearing Approves Preliminary Plat, Land Use PlanChange and PUD Rezoning City Council Approves Final Bldg. Plans Council Holds Public Hearing on Cty Rd D Project Proceeds to Construction Acquisition of Right of Way for Cty Rd D Construction of Cty Rd D (TH 61 to Hzlwd) Construction of Cty Rd D (West of TH 61) Due Date Requirements 09/19/02 Adopts Alignment 4B 12/09/02 Study Area Defined 11/26/02 21 Days for Review 12/03/02 Recommends Option 12/09/02 Draft Rpt by 11 /01 12/09/02 ROW Map Authorize 12/23/02 Sent for Pub Review 01/06/03 30 Days for Review 01/27/03 City Council Action 02/03/03 30 Days for Review 02/06/03 02/10/03 Developer & Pub Needs $$ 2/10 to 3/03 21 Days 03/03/03 60 Day Review Clock Starts 03/03/03 No Public Comment 03/05/03 03/10/03 :.No Testimony Received 03/10/03 03/24/03 Public Testimony Welcome 21 Days: Objections to Action 04/07/03 Final Alignment of Roadway 04/14/03 Public Comment Welcome 04/21/03 Submittal Due 45 Days Prior 04/22/03 Submittal Due 45 Days Prior 04/28/03 Directs Project to Proceed 04/28/03 No Testimony Received 04/28/03 Final Approvals 05/12/03 Submittal 45 Days Prior 05/12/03 Public Comment Welcome June — Sept 2003 Property Owner with City Oct 2003 — Nov 2004 April 2004 — Nov 2004 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. XX -XX A RESOLUTION TO RECEIVE COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON AN ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW(AUAR)FOR THE LEGACY VIL_ VILLAGE AT _ MAPLEWOOD IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING WHICH PURPOSE SHALL BE TO ADOPT THE FINAL AUAR-AND MITIGATION PLAN. WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 provides for a substitute form of Environmental Review known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process; and WHEREAS, an AUAR process allows for the environmental review of development and associated ig infrastructure in a particular geographic area within a jurisdiction if the local overnmental unit has an adopted comprehensive plan; and 'WHEREAS, on November 25, 2002, the Maplewood City Council authorized preparation of an AUAR for the Legacy Village at Maplewood project; and WHEREAS, the firm of SRF Consulting Group, Inc. has prepared a draft AUAR for the developer of Legacy Village at Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the City is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 Subp. l; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the draft AUAR and found it to be in acceptable order designating the impacts of the proposed development and authorized the release of the AUAR on December 23, 2002, to"receive all comments and reviews related to the environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the City allowed the required minimum 30 -day comment period for the AUAR; and WHEREAS, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. has prepared responses to the comments received;. and WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood desires to receive public testimony on -the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan before considering adoption of same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the City Council hereby: 1. Receives all comments and responses to the draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review. 2. Calls a public hearing for 7:00 pm on March 24, 2003, for the purpose of receivingpublic testimony on the AUAR and for the purpose of considering adopting the final AUAR and Mitigation Plan. Passed and adopted this day of 2003