HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003 01-27 City Council PacketCouncil /Manager's Workshop 6: 00 p. m.
AGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, January 27, 2003
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 03 -02
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the January 13, 2003 City Council Meeting
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed
from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Police Civil Service Commission Reappointment
3. Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board Reappointments
4. Park Commission Reappointment
5. Cigarette and Tobacco License Annual Renewal
6. Conditional Use Permit Review - Mounds Park Academy (2501 Larpenteur Avenue)
7. Maplewood Firefighter's Relief Association Bylaw Change
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 p.m. Conditional Use Permit for Accessory Building (2776 Keller Parkway)
2. 7:10 p.m. Kennard/Frost Street Improvements, Project 02 -10
3. 7:30 p.m. Sign Setback Variance - Markham Pond Office Building (1570 Beam Avenue)
I. AWARD OF BIDS
1. . Bids for Maplewood City Newsletter
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Highwood Farm Preliminary Plat Time Extension
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. NPDES Permit Application, City Project 02 -22- Authorize Preparation of Permit Application
and Direct Investigation of Environmental /Surface Water Utility
2. County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to TH 61), City Project 02 -07- County Road D
Extension (West of TH 61)- City Project 02 -08 Resolution Receiving Environmental
Assessment Worksheet and Authorizing Distribution of EAW for Public Review
3. County Road B Street Light Request (West of Mississippi Street)- Review Request for Street
Light Installation
4. Parkway Lift Station, Project 02 -14- Approve Resolution Accepting Report and Calling for
Public Hearing
5. Planning Commission 2002 Annual Report
6. 2003 Council Appointments
7. Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals - -On -Sale
8. Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals -- Off -Sale
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1
2.
3.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Group Home Meeting - January 29, 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.- Council Chambers
2. Council Retreat Date
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request
for this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 770 -4523 to
make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings - elected
officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and
understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood
that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in
check and use respectful language.
AGENDA ITEM N
DRAFT -- MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Action b Council �
f 7:00 P.M., Monday, January 13, 2003
Council Chambers Municipal Building D`.e
p g 4
Ey
Meeting No. 03 -01
Rej:
A. CALL TO ORDER:
A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the Municipal Building, and
was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Robert Cardinal, Mayor
Present
Kenneth V. Collins, Councilmember
Absent
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember
Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember
Present
Julie A. Wasiluk, Councilmember
�, Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes from the December 23, 2002 City Council Meeting, Meeting No. .02-13
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to a - pprove the City Council Minutes of December 23, 2002
meeting as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
M1. DARE Graduation
M2. Cable Commission Annual Report
M3. Joint Meeting with School Boards 622 and /or 623
N1. MLC Regional II Meeting
M4. Ramsey County League of Local Government
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve the amenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
F. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
Dan Kaler, Superintendent of School District of 622 thanked the council and staff for their
support regarding the two levy questions on the 2002 ballot. He also provided the city with a
copy of the District 622 Executive Summary for 2002.
tv Council-01-13-03- l
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the consent agenda as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes- All
1. Approval of Claims
ACCOUNTS
T)AZTAT T7
$3,710.00 Checks #59755 thru #59756 dated 12/19/02
$214,335.72 Checks #59757 thru #59817 dated 12 /20/02
$1,632,510.63 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12/13 thru 12/18/02
$850.00 Checks #59818 thru #dated 12/23/02
$464,071.65 Checks #59819 thru #59854 dated 12/31/02
$243,858.37 Disbursements via debits to checking account
T) AX 7T7 f T
$390,917.61 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
dated 12/19 thru 12/26/02
$130,307.63
Checks #59855 thru #59856 dated 12/30 thru
12/31/02
$465,237.84
Checks #59857 thru #59913 dated 1/3 thru
1/7/03
$
Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 12/27/02 thru 1/2/03
$4,696,873.13
Total Accounts Payable
T) AX 7T7 f T
$390,917.61 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
$ GRAND TOTAL
2. Utility Billing Agreement Amendment
Approved the Utility Billing Agreement Amendment.
Citv Council 01 -13 -03 2
12/20/02
$23,210.85
Payroll Deduction checks #91814 thru #91818
dated 12/20/02
$390,907.84
Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
1/3/03
$24
Payroll Deduction checks #91981 thru #91987
dated 1/3/03
$829,948.41
Total Payroll
$ GRAND TOTAL
2. Utility Billing Agreement Amendment
Approved the Utility Billing Agreement Amendment.
Citv Council 01 -13 -03 2
3. Budget Transfers for Employees Bargaining Group Settlements
Authorized the appropriate budget transfers from the contingency accounts totaling
$351,070 to finance settlements with the employee bargaining groups.
4. 2003 Animal Control Services Contract
Accepted the 2003 contract proposal from Animal Control Services, Inc.
5. Purchase of Police Vehicles
Authorized the purchase of five 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Squad Cars and one 2003
Dodge Intrepid.
6. Donations to the Police Department
Accepted the donations from Countryside Volkswagen -Saab ($3000) and The Partnership
($30).
7. Final Plat- Anderson Hillwood Oaks (Mailand Road and Dorland Road South)
Approved the Anderson Hillwood Oaks final plat. This approval is subject to the owner
of 2310 Mailand Road vacating the existing 33- foot -wide private driveway easement and
the applicant recording the plat with the county.
8. Conditional Use Permit Review -Saint Paul Regional Water Services (1900 Rice Street)
Agreed to review the St. Paul Regional Water Services' conditional use permit again in
one year.
9. Conditional Use Permit Review- Emma's Place (2161, 2163 and 2165 Van Dyke Street)
Agreed to review the permit for Emma's Place again in one year.
10. Conditional Use Permit Review - Carefree Cottage Villas (Phase IV) (1735 and 1737
Gervais Avenue East)
Agreed to review the conditional use permit for the planned unit development (PUD) for
the Carefree Villas (Phase IV) again in one year or sooner if the owner proposes a change
to the site.
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
I. AWARD OF BIDS
None
Citv Council 01 -13 -03 3
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Intoxicating Liquor License -Red Lobster - Ehrick Holland
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
C. Ehrick Holland, the applicant, was present to answer questions.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the intoxicating liquor license for Ehrick Holland for
Red Lobster Restaurant.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
2. Intoxicating Liquor License - Bennigan's - Bernard Klarkowski
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
C. Bernard Klarkowski, the applicant, was present to answer questions.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the intoxicating liquor license for Bernard
Klarkowski for Bennigans Restaurant.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
3. Personal Service License - Barbara Ann Schuett for Sister Rosalind Gefre's at Maplewood
Community Center
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Clerk Guilfoile presented specifics from the report.
C. Barbara Ann Schuett, the applicant, was present to answer questions.
Councilmember Wasiluk moved to approve Barbara Ann Schuett for an individual personal
service license.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
4. Lift Station No. 2, Project 00 -1 l: Resolutions for Final Recapitulation of Construction
Contract (Change Order #1) and Acceptance of Project
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
Citv Council 0 1- 13 -03 4
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Koppen
Contract and Acceptance of Project
RESOLUTION 03 -01 -001
FINAL RECAPITULATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 00 -11, Gravity Sanitary Sewer for Lift Station No. 2, and has let a construction
contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, construction has now been completed with increases in the quantity of some
contract unit price items that have resulted in a final project cost greater than the original contract
amount, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary that said final contract be modified and designated as
Improvement Project 00 -11, Final Recapitulation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing
contract by executing said Final Recapitulation in the amount of $8,123.47. The final contract amount is
$190,578.47.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary from the
sewer fund to implement the revised financing plan for the project. The project budget is increased by
$8123.47
RESOLUTION 03 -01 -002
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that the Improvements
of the Gravity Sewer for Lift Station No.2, City Project 00 -11, are complete and recommends acceptance
of the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that City Project 00 -11 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted
by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes -All
Maple Hills Lift Station Relocation, Project 02 -04: Resolution Directing Modification of
Existing Construction Contract (Change Order #2)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the following resolutions Directing the
Modification of the Existing Construction Contract (Change Order No 2) for Maple Hills Lift
Citv Council 01 -13 -03
ri
Station Relocation, Project 02 -04:
RESOLUTION 03 -01 -003
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Project 02 -04, Maple Hills Lift Station Relocation, and has let a construction contract
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as
Improvement Project 02 -04, Change Order No. 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing
contract by executing said Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $1,642.30. The revised contract amount
is $160,519.80.
No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these changes fall within
the original project budget.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
6. English Street Improvements, Proj ect 01 -14: Resolution Directing Modification Existing
Construction Contract, Change Order #1)
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the attached resolution Directing the Modification of
the Existing Construction Contract for the English Street Improvements, Protect 01 -14:
RESOLUTION 03 -01 -004
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made
Improvement Proj ect 01 -14, English Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as
Improvement Proj ect 01 -14, Change Order No. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing
contract by executing said Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $71,517.57. The revised contract
amount is $1,268,100.98.
No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these changes fall within
the original project budget. A final project recap will be done at a later date to reapportion funding
Citv Council 01 -13 -03 6
based on the cost of work.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
7. Kennard /Frost Area Streets, Project 02 -10: Resolution Accepting Report and Calling for
Public Hearing
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to adopt the following resolution to accept the report and call
for a public hearing for 7:00 p.m. Monday, January 27, 2003, for the Kennard /Frost Area
Improvements project:
RESOLUTION 03 -01 -005
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted June 10, 2002, a report has been
prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of Kennard /Frost Area
Streets, City Project 02 -10, and this report was received by the council on January 13, 2003, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost - effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report
and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $3,160,500.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 27th day of January
2003 in the council chambers of city hall at 7 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice
of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
8. South Maplewood Comprehensive Study (Sewer), Project 03 -03- Authorization to
Conduct Comprehensive Sewer Study
a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report.
b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to authorize the city engineer to hire a consulting engineer to
assist in the preparation of a Comprehensive Sewer Study of South Maplewood from Linwood
Avenue to the southern city border and direct the finance director to transfer $15,000 from the
sewer fund to establish a project fund.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All
Citv Council 01 -13 -03
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Sewer Concerns -Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane, expressed concerns about a
sewer problem on Lower Afton Road.
M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. DARE Graduation -Mayor Cardinal would like to see other Councilmembers participate
in the DARE Graduation Ceremonies.
2. Executive Report on the Cable Commission -Tim Finnerty, Executive Director of the
Ramsey Washington County Cable Commission compiled a year -end report, which
Mayor Cardinal passed on to City Manager Fursman.
3. Joint Meeting with School Board -Mayor Cardinal would like to extended a welcome for
a joint meeting with the local school districts.
4. Ramsey County League of Local Governments - Councilmember Wasiluk extended an
invitation to other Councilmembers and the public to meet your legislators on January
23 7:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the League of Minnesota Cities Building n University
Y
Avenue in St. Paul.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Council Retreat Date -City Manager Fursman requested a date be set for the annual
meeting. Two dates will be brought to the staff and the facilitator for final approval.
2. Group Home Meeting- City Manager Fursman noted a meeting will be held on January
29 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the council chambers to discuss Grou p Homes.
3. 2003 Minnesota League of Cities Region II Meeting -City Manager Fursman announced
this Breakfast Meeting will be held Wednesday, January 22, 7:30 - 9:30 am at
W o o dbury's Central Park.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Koppen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:1 p.m.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes - All
Citv Council 01 -13 -03
AGENDA NO. G -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council
FROM:
Finance Director ---
RE:
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE:
January 22, 2003
Action by Council
Date .-
Endo set
Modified
Rejected
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the
bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
$156,888.32 Checks #59914 thru #59986 dated 1/14/03
$253,119.37 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1/3 thru 1/9/03
$150.00 Checks #59987 dated 1/15/03
$114,990.18 Checks #59988 thru #60032 dated 1/17 thru
1/21/03
$58 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 1 /10 thru 1/16/03
$583,651.21 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$522,887.18 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated
1/17/03
$25,875.38 Payroll Deduction checks #92237 thru #92241
dated 1/17/03
$548,762.56 Total Payroll
$1,132,413.77 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 770 -4513 if you have any
questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation
on file if necessary.
hu
attachments
PARNANCEMORMAGMApC1AR 012203.doc
1
vchlist Check Register Page: 1
01/10/2003 10:49:58AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor
59914
1/14/2003
01047
3M
59915
1/14/2003
01908
ADMINISTRATION, DEPT OF
59916
1/14/2003
02106
ADVANCED BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
59917
1/14/2003
00064
ALDRIDGE, MARK
59918
1/14/2003
00101
ANDERSON, BRUCE K
59919
1/14/2003
00111
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
59920
1/14/2003
00112
ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC
59921
1/14/2003
00134
ASSN OF METRO MUNICIPALITIES
59922
1/14/2003
00135
ASSN OF TRNG OFFICERS OF MN
59923
1/14/2003
02706
BIRDSEYE VIEW
59924
1/14/2003
00198
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
59925
1/14/2003
02214
C & D COMMUNICATIONS INC
59926
1/14/2003
00240
C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES
59927
1/14/2003
00252
CAPITOL CITY REG FIRE FIGHTERS
59928
1/14/2003
00262
CARLE, JEANETTE
59929
1/14/2003
02585
CENTRAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
59930
1/14/2003
02681
CREATIVE PROMOTIONS I NTL LLC
59931 1/14/2003 00358
DGM INC.
59932 1/14/2003 00412 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES
59933 1/14/2003 02707 FIRE -GUARD SPRINKLER SRV INC
59934
1/14/2003
01926
59935
1/14/2003
02237
59936
1/14/2003
00718
59937
1/14/2003
02708
59938
1/14/2003
00771
59939
1/14/2003
01894
GOVERNING
IMPERIAL IMPRESSIONS
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #622
JOE CHAVES EXCAVATING
JOHNSON, RICK
KELLY & FAWCETT PA
59940
1/14/2003
00782
KPMG LLP
59941
1/14/2003
00893
M A U M A
59942
1/14/2003
00902
M E M A
59943
1/14/2003
00908
M R P A
59944
1/14/2003
00918
MAD SCIENCE OF MINNESOTA
59945
1/14/2003
00932
MAPLEWOOD BAKERY
59946
1/14/2003
00945
MASYS CORP
59947
1/14/2003
01819
MCLEOD USA
59948
1/14/2003
00977
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
59949
1/14/2003
00982
METRO FIRE INC
59950
1/14/2003
00901
MGFOA
59951
1/14/2003
00901
MGFOA
59952
1/14/2003
01079
MN CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN
59953
1/14/2003
01082
MN DARE OFFICERS ASSN
59954
1/14/2003
01051
MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Descriation /Account
WHITE DIAMOND TAPE
DATA PROCESSING - NOV
SERVICE PRINTER
REIMBURSE FOR TUITION & BOOKS
REIMBURSE FOR ROTARY CLUB GIFT
PATROL & BOARDING FEES 12/11 - 12/
PATROL & BOARDING FEES 12/21 TO 1
EMERGENCY CARE FOR K -9
2003 AMM MEMBERSHIP DUES
2003 AGENCY MEMBERSHIPS
AERIAL PHOTO
ANNUAL AUTO FIRE SUPPLY
PHONE BILL
APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS
2003 CAPITOL CITY REGIONAL DUES
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 10/1 TO 12/31
FITNESS PROGRAM FEES
T- SHIRTS
400 HENLEY SHIRTS INCLUDES ARTWOI
TOW FORFEITURE
TOW FORFEITURE
TOW FORFEITURE
TOW FORFEITURE
TOW SQUAD
EFF MGMT PROG REGISTRATION
EFF MGMT PROG REGISTRATION
ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSP - NC
ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSP - CITY H
ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSP - GARA
ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSP - PW
SUBSCRIPTION TO GOVERNING MAGAZ
REPORT CORRECTION FORMS
BASKETBALL GYM RENTAL
BOULDERS
DEER REMOVAL
PROSECUTION RETAINER FEE - DEC
LEGAL SERVICES - DEC
ANNUAL AUDIT
2003 MEMBERSHIP
2003 MEMA MEMBERSHIP
VOLLEYBALL TEAM REGISTRATION
WORKSHOPS
BIRTHDAY CAKES
BIRTHDAY CAKES
STRATUS SOFTWARE MAINT
DSL SERVICE STATION 7
DSL SERVICE REMOTE SITES - JAN
72 DOZEN SOFTBALLS TAX INCLUDED
TNT OIL
2003 MEMBERSHIP
LUNCH MEETING
2003 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL DUES
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION - 3
PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
Amount
495.25
392.00
75.00
661.80
127.97
1,362.55
854.95
168.48
8,135.00
175.00
159.00
700.00
243.75
50.00
50.00
14.60
1,014.94
44.75
4,163.00
58.58
79.88
163.45
99.88
58.58
822.43
600.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
130.00
16.00
319.87
390.00
158.00
200.00
9,825.00
9,892.79
5,000.00
30.00
30.00
1,072.00
210.00
32.50
30.50
738.68
411.73
800.92
3,195.00
21.00
120.00
15.00
150.00
480.00
544.00
vchlist
01/10/2003 10:49:58AM
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Page: 2
Check
Date
Vendor
Description /Account
Amount
59955
1/14/2003
01174
NORTH ST PAUL- MAPLEWOOD-
MEMBER DUES
175.00
59956
1/14/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF PROM MGMT GROUP - DUP LICEN
200.00
59957
1/14/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
REF GARLOCK FRENCH ROOFING - PE
40.50
59958
1/14/2003
01941
PATRICK GRAPHICS & TROPHIES
TROPHIES
659.45
TROPHIES
183.18
59959
1/14/2003
01256
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
MANAGEMENT SELECTION TESTING
500.00
59960
1/14/2003
01267
PIONEER PRESS
CLASSIFIED AD FOR ENGINEERING TE
353.93
59961
1/14/2003
01284
POSTMASTER
PERMIT 4903 - MIM NEWSLETTER
12,000.00
59962
1/14/2003
01678
QWEST
CALL REPORTER PLUS STATISTICAL
8,448.00
59963
1/14/2003
02227
RABINE, JANET
REIMBURSE FOR UNIFORM
56.00
59964
1/14/2003
01931
RAMSEY COUNTY FAIR
DONATION
4,500.00
59965
1/14/2003
01337
RAMSEY COUNTY -PROP REC & REV
TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES
2,626.99
59966
1/14/2003
01359
REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX
CAR WASHES - DEC
252.91
59967
1/14/2003
01340
REGIONS HOSPITAL
PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES
343.00
59968
1/14/2003
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
MISC SUPPLIES
903.93
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
643.32
59969
1/14/2003
01387
ROSSINI, DR. JAMES
FITNESS PROGRAM FEES
100.00
59970
1/14/2003
01463
SISTER ROSALIND GEFRE
MCC MASSAGES - DEC
771.00
59971
1/14/2003
02229
SNELL MECHANICAL INC
REPAIR VAC SYSTEM
630.00
59972
1/14/2003
01556
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
FUEL
849.27
59973
1/14/2003
01514
ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC
DOG TAGS
165.88
59974
1/14/2003
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
CRIME LAB SERVICES - NOV
210.00
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
966.86
59975
1/14/2003
01550
SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
4
59976
1/14/2003
01572
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
TONER CARTRIDGES
385.87
TONER CARTRIDGES
400.65
59977
1/14/2003
00150
TALLEN & BAERTSCHI
2003 SUBSCRIPTION - MN POLICE BRIEF
90.00 ,
59978
1/14/2003
01615
THERMO -DYNE, INC.
REPAIR DEHUMIDIFER
405.00
59979
1/14/2003
02164
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
PROD 01 -29 PROF SRVS
3,778.49
59980
1/14/2003
01026
TRANSPORTATION, DEPT OF
CONCRETE & BITUMINOUS INSPECTIO
572.35
59981
1/14/2003
01664
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO.
RESET GARAGE DOOR
486.00
59982
1/14/2003
01691
U S POLICE CANINE ASSN INC
2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES
80.00
59983
1/14/2003
02464
US BANK
PAYING AGENT FEES - 2002
262.50
59984
1/14/2003
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP
8
59985
1/14/2003
01754
WEBER & TROSETH INC.
FIRE EXTINQUISHER CERT /INSP - CITY f
107.95
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS CERT /INSP - MC
223.50
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS CERT /INSP
205.35
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS CERT /INSP - P &R
207.35
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CERT /INSP - NC
19.95
59986
1/14/2003
01190
XCEL ENERGY
MONTHLY UTIL - STMT DATE 1/6/03
46,062.71
73 Checks in this
report
Total checks :
156,858.32
3
0
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted Settlement
Date Date Pale
Description
01/02/03
01/03/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
01/03/03
01/03/03
1 ICMA (Vantagepointe)
Deferred Compensation
12/27/02
01/03/03
Elan Financial Services
Purchasing card items
01/03/03
01/06/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
01/03/03
01/06/03
P. E. R, A.
P. E. R. A.
01/03/03
01/06/03
U.S. Treasurer
Federal Payroll Tax
01/03/03
01/06/03
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic licenses
01/06/03
01/07/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
01/03/03
01/07/03
MN State Treasurer
State Payroll Tax
01/07/03
01/08/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
01/08/03
01/09/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
TOTAL
Amount
9,960.25
6,947.22
44,465.07
11,236.57
45,787.71
82, 608.29
846.50
12,831.50
15,814.01
12,055.50
10,566.75
4 1 1 d.�.11
�1
vchlist
01/17/2003
11:10:52AM
Check Register
City of Maplewood
Page: 1
Check
Date
Vendor
59987
1/15/2003
00396
59988
1/21/20.03
00111
59989
1/21/2003
00154
59990
1/21/20 03
00211
59991
1/21/2003
02711
59992
1/21/2003
02712
59993
1/21/2003
02214
59994
1/21/2003,
00241
59995
1/21/2,003
00354
59996
1/21/2003.
02533
59997
1/21/2003
02713
59998
1/21/2003
00463
59999
1 /21 /2003
00532
60000
1/21/2003
00539
60001
1/21/2003
00584
PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC
BARNES & NOBLE INC
BRAUN INTERTEC CORP.
BREITBACH, GARY
BROOKLYN PARK EDA
C & D COMMUNICATIONS INC
CSI SOFTWARE
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS, INC.
DON ZAPPA & SON EXCAVATING INC
ELLISON RECYCLING EQUIPMENT CO
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT.
FRANK MADDEN & ASSN
FREEDOM VALU CENTER
GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING
Description /Account
EMERGENCY MGMT CONF REGISTRA
PATROL & BOARDING FEES
BOOKS
PROJ 00 -03 GLADSTONE SO
REIMBURSE FOR THEATER SUPPLIES
DEV OF SPLIT ENTRY /LEVEL PLANBOO
STATION 2 PHONE REPAIR
KEY TAGS
FOLDING WHEEL CLOCK
PROJ 02 -04 MAPLE HILLS PYMT #3
RECYCLING CONTAINERS
REPAIR VEHICLE - ENGINE 3
CONSULTING SERVICES - DEC
CAR WASHES
STAGE BULBS
SUPPLIES
LOCATE BILLABLE TICKETS
PROF SERVICES 12/4/02
POLAR PLUS DIESEL, LOW SULPHUR, R
INSTALL SECURITY LIGHT & PHOTO EY
INSTALL SECURITY LIGHT & PHOTO EY
INSTALL SECURITY LIGHT & PHOTO EY
CONSULTING FEE 11/2 & 12/4
MCMA MID - WINTER PROF DEV SEMINA
MONTHLY SAC - DEC
DARE CONF REGISTRATION
2003 ANNUAL DUES
REIMBURSE MILEAGE 11/1 TO 12/31
REPAIR OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR
NEWSLETTER - JAN
MCC TOUR BROCHURES
REF DELORES GOERTZEN - AMB 02019
REF NICK CUCCHIARELLA - MEMBERSH
REF KIMBERLY KOCUR - FENCING
FITNESS CONSULTANT - 4TH QTR
REIMBURSE FOR MEALS 10/27 TO 11/8
REIMBURSE FOR MEALS 11/18 TO 11/20
SNOWMOBILE RENTAL PERMIT #14706
WATERFEST 2003 CITY CONTRIBUTION
MERCH FOR RESALE
CREDIT INVOICE 821688
PROJ 01 -14 PROF SRVS - DEC
CRIME LAB SERVICES - DEC
RADIO BILLING - DEC
START -UP OF APR POOL UNIT
REPAIR DEHUMIDIFICATION SYS
REPLACE COMPRESSOR
VIDEO PROJECTOR RENTAL
JANITORIAL SERVICES
6 - 40 YARD DUMPSTERS PLUS TAX -
VOICE TREK CONCERT - FINAL PYMT
2003 MEMBERSHIP DUES
COMM PLUMBING INSPECTIONS
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ANNUAL CERT /IN
60002
1/21/2003
00585
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
60003
1/21/2003
02643
HITESMAN & ASSOCIATES PA
60004
1/21/2003
00789
KATH FUEL OIL SERVICE CO
60005
1/21/2003
00790
KELLER ELECTRIC INC
60006
1/21/2003
02710
LYNN & ASSOCIATES
60007
1/17/2003
00896
M C M A
60008
1/21/2003
00986
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
60009
1/21/2003
01082
MN DARE OFFICERS ASSN
60010
1/21/2003
01115
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMM
60011
1/21/2003
01156
NELSON, JEAN
60012
1/21/2003
01184
NORTHERN DOOR CO
60013
1/21/2003
01202
NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
60014
1/21/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
60015
1/21/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
60016
1/21/2003
00001
ONE TIME VENDOR
60017
1/21/2003
01590
PANOS, MARSHA ANN
60018
1/21/2003
01331
RABBETT, KEVIN
60019
1/21/2003
01344
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & REC.
60020
1/21/2003
01346
RAMSEY- WASHINGTON METRO DIST
60021
1/21/2003
01360
REINHART FOODSERVICE
60022
1/21/2003
01409
S.E.H.
60023
1/21/2003
01504
ST PAUL, CITY OF
60024
1/21/2003
01615
THERMO -DYNE, INC.
60025
1/21/2003
01626
TIERNEY BROTHERS INC.
60026
1/21/2003
01580
TS E, INC.
60027
1/21/2003
02350
VASKO ROLL -OFF SERVICE
60028
1/21/2003
01724
VOICE TREK
60029
1/21/2003
01732
WAKOTA MUTUAL AID ASSOC.
60030
1/21/2003
01734
WALSH, WILLIAM P.
60031
1/21/2003
01754
WEBER & TROSETH INC.
Amount
150.00
634.46
361.72
465.00
47.88
5,000.00
131.25
795.00
213.50
35,381.22
2,073.55
127.58
40.00
102.24
109.91
95.85
23.25
72.00
6,324.24
279.00
279.00
279.00
400.00
205.00
22,572.00
160.00
9,070.00
71.54
108.42
3,599.57
1,383.44
933.20
106.50
40.00
1,550.00
18.84
24.57
534.75
500.00
257.65
-9.86
149.07
380.00
795.09
3,000.00
292.50
9,491.32
150.00
796.83
2,472.00
1,73200
25.00
820.75
519.35
vchlist Check Register Page: 2
01/1712003 11 :10:52AM City of Maplewood
Check Date Vendor Description /Account Amount
60032 1/21/2003 01771 WHITE BEAR LAKE, CITY OF TRAINING 1/812003 5.00
46 Checks in this report Total checks : 115,140.18
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
N
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Transmitted
Settlement
Date
Date
Payee
Description
Amount
01/09/03
01/10/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License/Deputy Registrar
Y 9
13 317.13
,
01/09/03
01/10/03
DCRP /Flex account
DCRP & Flex plan payments
1
01/09/03
01/10/03
MN Dept of Natural Resources
DNR electronic Licenses
365.00
01/10/03
011/13/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /De ut Registrar
License/Deputy Y g
11 767.50
,
01/13/03
01/14/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
14
01/14/03
01/15/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
8
01/13/03
01/15/03
MN Dept of Revenue
MN Care Tax
2,374.00
01/15/03
01/16/03
MN State Treasurer
Drivers License /Deputy Registrar
6
TOTAL
58,503.34
N
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
1�
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/17/03
COLLINS, KENNETH
357.47
dd
01/17/03
JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN
357.47
dd
01/17/03
KOPPEN, MARVIN
3 5 7.47
dd
01/17/03
DARST, ROBERTA
L363.27
dd
01/17/03
FURSMAN, RICHARD
5
dd
01/17/03
SCHLINGMAN, PAUL
2,014.70
dd
01/17/03
SEEGER, GERALD
477.16
dd
01/17/03
SWANSON, LYLE
1,640.17
dd
01/17/03
CARLSON, THERESE
2,066.45
dd
01/17/03
LE, SHERYL
3
dd
01/17/03
FAUST, DANIEL
3,724.78
dd
01/17/03
URBANSKI, HOLLY
1,652.01
dd
01/17/03
ANDERSON, CAROLE
2
dd
01/17/03
BADMAN, GAYLE
2,743.07
dd
01/17/03
JACKSON, MARY
1,706.09
dd
01/17/03
KELSEY, CONNIE
1
dd
01/17/03
TETZLAFF, JUDY
1
dd
01/17/03
FRY, PATRICIA
L598.21
dd
01/17/03
GUILFOILE, KAREN
2,531.76
dd
01/17/03
O STER, ANDREA
L654.31
dd
01/17/03
CAROE, JEANETTE
L578.93
dd
01/17/03
JAGOE, CAROL
1
dd
01/17/03
JOHNSON, BONNIE
858.93
dd
01/17/03
OLSON, SANDRA
1,235.86
dd
01/17/03
WEAVER, KRISTINE
1,637.66
dd
01/17/03
CORCORAN, THERESA
1,324.33
dd
01/17/03
MARTINSON, CAROL
1,584.48
dd
01/17/03
POWELL, PHILIP
1,905.74
dd
01/17/03
SPANGLER, EDNA
181.50
dd
01/17/03
THOMALLA, DAVID
3,526.50
dd
01/17/03
ABEL, CLINT
1,856.26
dd
01/17/03
ALDRIDGE, MARK
2,270.70
dd
01/17/03
ANDREWS, SCOTT
3,131.33
dd
01/17/03
BAKKE, LONN
2J77.35
dd
01/17/03
BANICK, JOHN
4,296.75
dd
01/17/03
BELDE, STANLEY
2
dd
01/17/03
BIERDEMAN, BRIAN
1
dd
01/17/03
BOHL, JOHN
21A28.62
dd
01/17/03
BUSACK, DANIEL
2,122.07
dd
01/17/03
COFFEY, KEVIN
1,493.80
dd
01/17/03
DOBLAR, RICHARD
2,623.17
dd
01/17/03
HALWEG, KEVIN
2,910.25
dd
01/17/03
HEINZ, STEPHEN
3,403.20
dd
01/17/03
HIEBERT, STEVEN
3,110.67
1�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/17/03
JOHNSON, KEVIN
2,944.87
dd
01/17/03
KARIS, FLINT
2,642.29
dd
01/17/03
KONG, TOMMY
2,111.83
dd
01/17/03
KROLL, BRETT
2,006.30
dd
01/17/03
KVAM, DAVID
3
dd
01/17/03
LARSON, DANIEL
2,380.45
dd
01/17/03
LU, JOHNNIE
L856.26
dd
01/17/03
MARINO, JASON
1,700.93
dd
01/17/03
MARTIN, JERROLD
1
dd
01/17/03
METRY, ALESIA
1, 672.64
dd
01/17/03
OLSON, JULIE
2,270.55
dd
01/17/03
PALMA, STEVEN
4,3 68.41
dd
01/17/03
PIKE, GARY
2,297.37
dd
01/17/03
RABBETT, KEVIN
2,767.79
dd
01/17/03
STEFFEN, SCOTT
4,469.04
dd
01/17/03
STOCKTON, DERRELL
2,548.41
dd
01/17/03
SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS
2,322.80
dd
01/1 7/03
THIENES, PAUL
2,774.16
dd
01/17/03
TRAN, JOSEPH
1
dd
01/17/03
WATCZAK, LAURA
2,322.34
dd
01/17/03
WENZEL, JAY
2,115.21
dd
01/17/03
XIONG, KAO
1,920.87
dd
01/17/03
BARTZ, PAUL
2,364.80
dd
01/17/03
BERGERON, JOSEPH
2,798.52
dd
01/17/03
CROTTY, KERRY
2
dd
01/17/03
DUGAS, MICHAEL
1, 694.3 7
dd
01/17/03
DUNK, ALICE
2,384.48
dd
01/17/03
EVERSON, PAUL
2,092.04
dd
01/17/03
FLOR, TIMOTHY
2
dd
01/17/03
FRASER, JOHN
2,425.91
dd
01/17/03
HALWEG, JODI
1
dd
01/17/03
KATZMAN, BARBARA
1
dd
01/17/03
PARSONS, KURT
1
dd
01/17/03
ROSSMAN, DAVID
2
dd
01/17/03
BECKER, SHANE
1,208.00
dd
01/17/03
CHRISTENSEN, CHARLES
1,528.80
dd
01/17/03
DAW SON, RICHARD
1,642.41
dd
01/17/03
DUELLMAN, KIRK
1, 642.41
dd
01/1 7/03
FITZGERALD, EDWARD
737.80
dd
01/17/03
GRILL, CARL
976.80
dd
01/17/03
HEMQUIST, MICHAEL
2
dd
01/17/03
HJELLE, ERIK
1, 3 60.3 0
dd
01/17/03
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1,618.65
dd
01/17/03
KUSKEY, JOSEPH
1
dd
01/17/03
MELANDER, SCOTT
571.60
dd
01/17/03
NOVAK, JEROME
.1,618.65
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
10
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/17/03
PETERSON, MARK
764.30
dd
01/17/03
PETERSON, ROBERT
1,757.95
dd
01/17/03
ROBERTSON, STEVEN
1,029.60
dd
01/17/03
SVENDSEN, RON
118.80
dd
01/17/03
SVENDSEN, RONALD
L642.41
dd
01/17/03
GERVAIS -JR, CLARENCE
2,345.01
dd
01/17/03
BOYER, SCOTT
2,030.66
dd
01/17/03
FEHR, JOSEPH
1,934.32
dd
01/17/03
FLAUGHER, JAMME
2,022.63
dd
01/17/03
LAFFERTY, WALTER
2,03 5.03
dd
01/17/03
LINN, BRYAN
1
dd
01/17/03
PACOLT, MARSHA
1,98 8.49
dd
01/17/03
RABINE, JANET
2,022.63
dd
01/17/03
SCHAULS, ADAM
482.82
dd
01/17/03
STAHNKE, JULIE
2,022.63
dd
01/17/03
LUKIN, STEVEN
3
dd
01/17/03
SVENDSEN, RUSTIN
2
dd
01/17/03
ZWIEG, SUSAN
1
dd
01/17/03
DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT
268.49
dd
01/17/03
AHL, R. CHARLES
3,743.58
dd
01/17/03
NIVEN, AMY
L041.00
dd
01/17/03
PRIEFER, WILLIAM
3,478.69
dd
01/17/03
WEGWERTH, JUDITH
1
dd
01/17/03
BRINK, TROY
1
dd
01/17/03
DEBILZAN, THOMAS
1
dd
01/17/03
EDGE, DOUGLAS
1,872.73
dd
01/17/03
KANE, MICHAEL
2
dd
01/17/03
LUTZ, DAVID
3
dd
01/17/03
MEYER, GERALD
1, 792.44
dd
01/17/03
NAGEL, BRYAN
1,908.97
dd
01/17/03
OSWALD, ERICK
1,924.40
dd
01/17/03
TEVLIN, TODD
1,43 9.21
dd
01/17/03
B OHMBACH, JOSHUA
415.35
dd
01/17/03
CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER
2
dd
01/17/03
DUCHARME, JOHN
2,112.66
dd
01/17/03
LINDB LOM, RANDAL
2
dd
01/17/03
PECK, DENNIS
2,206.04
dd
01/17/03
PRIEBE, WILLIAM
2,201.42
dd
01/17/03
SCHACHT, ERIN
2
dd
01/17/03
ANDERSON, BRUCE
3,586.99
dd
01/17/03
DOHERTY, KATHLEEN
1
dd
01/17/03
MARUSKA, MARK
3,576.10
dd
01/17/03
NAUGHTON, JOHN
1
dd
01/17/03
SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES
1,721.93
dd
01/17/03
BIESANZ, OAKLEY
1,272.76
dd
01/17/03
GREW- HAYMAN, JANET
L019.51
10
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
11
CHECK # CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/17/03
HUTCHINSON, ANN
2,012.76
dd
01/17/03
KO S, HEATHER
308.75
dd
01/17/03
NELSON, JEAN
957.32
dd
01/17/03
GAYNOR, VIRGINIA
1, 7 82.41
dd
01/17/03
COLEMAN, MELINDA
3,661.66
dd
01/17/03
EKSTRAND, THOMAS
2
dd
01/17/03
KROLL, LISA
L010.46
dd
01/17/03
LIVINGSTON, JOYCE
894.41
dd
01/17/03
SINDT, ANDREA
1, 3 65.61
dd
01/17/03
THOMP SON, DEBRA
657.69
dd
01/17/03
YOUNG, TAMELA
1,2 63.05
dd
01/17/03
BERGO, CHAD
1
dd
01/17/03
FINWALL, SHANN
1
dd
01/17/03
ROBERTS, KENNETH
2, 344.93
dd
01/17/03
CARVER, NICHOLAS
2
dd
01/17/03
FISHER, DAVID
2, 671.86
dd
01/17/03
SWAN, DAVID
1
dd
01/17/03
KONEWKO, DUWAYNE
2,19 8.41
dd
01/17/03
ANZALDI, MANDY
953.50
dd
01/17/03
BARNES, JESSE
210.00
dd
01/17/03
BJORK, BRANDON
90.44
dd
01/17/03
FINN, GREGORY
2,565.10
dd
01/17/03
FLUG, ELAINE
37.00
dd
01/17/03
GRAF, MICHAEL
2,43 0.50
dd
01/17/03
KELLY, LISA
.1, 2 3 8.63
dd
01/17/03
LUSHANKO, ADAM
28.00
dd
01/17/03
MCBRIDE, PATRICK
60.00
dd
01/17/03
NIEMAN, JAMES
376.00
dd
01/17/03
NIEMCZYK, BRIAN
60.00
dd
01/17/03
ROBBINS, AUDRA
1
dd
01/17/03
TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS
2,498.96
dd
01/1 7/03
BREHEIM, ROGER
1 ,729.10
dd
01/17/03
NORDQUIST, RICHARD
1,745.62
dd
01/17/03
SCHULTZ, SCOTT
1
dd
01/17/03
COLEMAN, PHILIP
120.00
dd
01/17/03
CROSSON, LINDA
2,143.30
dd
01/17/03
EASTMAN, THOMAS
2,332.65
dd
01/17/03
ERICKSON, KYLE
714.44
dd
01/17/03
HERSOM, HEIDI
1
dd
01/17/03
PELOQUIN, PENNYE
458.27
dd
01/17/03
ROA, MILTON
49.70
dd
01/17/03
STAPLES, PAULINE
2,626.86
dd
01/17/03
ATKINS, KATHERINE
18.70
dd
01/17/03
BADEN, ALISON
36.40
dd
01/17/03
CORNER, AMY
85.20
dd
01/17/03
DOTY, JANET
23 2.18
11
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
12
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
dd
01/17/03
ERICKSON, CAROL
21.75
dd
01/17/03
GUZIK, JENNIFER
5 6.8 8
dd
01/17/03
HALEY, BROOKE
61.75
dd
01/17/03
H ORWATH, RONALD
L557.77
dd
01/17/03
IRISH, KARL
105.13
dd
01/17/03
KOEHNEN, MARY
716.77
dd
01/17/03
KRONHOLM, KATHRYN
499.98
dd
01/17/03
MARUSKA, ERICA
231.10
dd
01/17/03
OVERBY, ANNA
54.00
dd
01/17/03
POWERS, JESSICA
25.95
dd
01/17/03
S CHULTZ, PETER
3 2.5 0
dd
01/17/03
SIMONSON, JUSTIN
477.05
dd
01/17/03
THOEMKE, MARIE
3 2.81
dd
01/17/03
GROPPOLI, LINDA
27 8.3 0
dd
01/17/03,
RENSLOW, RITA
270.35
dd
01/17/03
CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND
113.05
dd
01/17/03
LONETTI, JAMES
1
dd
01/17/03
PRINS, KELLY
811.80
dd
01/17/03
REILLY, MICHAEL
L585.39
dd
01/17/03
STEINHORST, JEFFREY
505.68
dd
01/17/03
AICHELE, CRAIG
1
dd
01/17/03
PRIEM, STEVEN
L939.21
dd
01/17/03
FOWLDS, MYCHAL
1,620.59
dd
01/17/03
HURLEY, STEPHEN
2, 671.86
wf
91994
01/17/03
CARDINAL, ROBERT
406.20
wf
91995
01/17/03
WASILUK, JULIE
3 57.47
wf
91996
01/17/03
INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS
50.00
wf
91997
01/17/03
JAHN, DAVID
1
wf
91998
01/17/03
MALDINADO, JUANA
671.33
wf
91999
01/17/03
MORIN, TROY
17 8.5 0
wf
92000
01/17/03
MATHEYS, ALANA
3,474.97
wf
92001
01/17/03
HANSEN, LORI
1,514.31
wf
92002
01/17/03
VIETOR, LORRAINE
1,562.77
wf
92003
01/17/03
PALANK, MARY
1,527.85
wf
92004
01/17/03
RICHIE, CAROLE
1,546.46
wf
92005
01/17/03
SVENDSEN, JOANNE
1,688.37
wf
92006
01/17/03
STEINER, JOSEPH
453.00
wf
92007
01/17/03
WELCHLIN, CABOT
2
wf
92008
W17/03 % 17/03
SHORTREED, MICHAEL
2,913.38
wf
92009
01/17/03
ACOSTA, MARK
1,610.40
wf
92010
01/17/03
AMBORN, JASON
1,301.40
wf
92011
01/17/03
ANDERSON, BRIAN
102.40
wf
92012
01/17/03
BAHL, DAVID
1,364.90
wf
92013
01/17/03
BADMAN, ANDREW
1,556.30
wf
92014
01/17/03
BOE, ERICK
105.60
wf
92015
01/17/03
BOURQUIN, RON
553.60
12
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
13
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
92016
01/17/03
BUCHE, JOETTE
1,933.80
wf
92017
01/17/03
BUSCH, STEVEN
656.00
wf
92018
01/17/03
CAHILL, CHRISTOPHER
1,005.00
wf
92019
01/17/03
CAPISTRANT, JOHN
871.20
wf
92020
01/17/03
CASEY, TIMOTHY
328.00
wf
92021
01/17/03
CROMETT, MARK
1, 5 9 6.40
wf
92022
01/17/03
DAW SON, RICHARD
39.60
wf
92023
01/17/03
DIETZ, EDWARD
818.40
wf
92024
01/17/03
DITTEL, MICHAEL
1
wf
92025
01/17/03
DOREE, KURT
589.80
wf
92026
01/17/03
DUELLMAN, AMY
1,373.50
wf
92027
01/17/03
DUELLMAN, JOSEPH
792.00
wf
92028
01/17/03
DUELLMAN, KIRK
118.80
wf
92029
01/17/03
FASULO, WALTER
1
wf
92030
01/17/03
FETTERS, JEFFREY
2
wf
92031
01/17/03
GERARD, JAMIE
1,834.80
wf
92032
01/17/03
HAKSETH, NATHAN
1
wf
92033
01/17/03
HALE, JOSEPH
1,675.30
wf
92034
01/17/03
HASKINS, KEVIN
2,773.10
wf
92035
01/17/03
HEFFERNAN, PATRICK
105.70
wf
92036
01/17/03
HERLUND, RICK
1,865.80
wf
92037
01/17/03
HUTCHINSON, JAMES
336.00
wf
92038
01/17/03
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
52.80
wf
92039
01/17/03
KALKA, THOMAS
520.00
wf
92040
01/17/03
KANE, ROBERT
1,214.40
wf
92041
01/17/03
KARNOWSKI, SANDRA
2,598.00
wf
92042
01/17/03
KOEHN, CORY
673.20
wf
92043
01/17/03
KOLASA, MARK
1,023.80
wf
92044
01/17/03
KONDER, RONALD
804.40
wf
92045
01/17/03
KORTUS, WILLIAM
648.10
wf
92046
01/17/03
KUMMER, CORINNE
1,352.60
wf
92047
01/17/03
L'ALLIER, TED
699.60
wf
92048
01/17/03
LEDMAN, KEVIN
1,290.20
wf
92049
01/17/03
LIDBERG, MICHAEL
1,089.70
wf
92050
01/17/03
LINN, BRYAN
554.40
wf
92051
01/17/03
LOCHEN, MICHAEL
2,191.20
wf
92052
01/17/03
MALLORY, GORDON
2
wf
92053
01/17/03
MARTY, MARK
3
wf
92054
01/17/03
MARX, ERIC
3 82.80
wf
92055
01/17/03
MCGOVERN, JOHN
1,18 5.30
wf
92056
01/17/03
MCINTOSH, JOHN
390.00
wf
92057
01/1 7/03
MELANDER, JON
2,357.10
wf
92058
01/17/03
MELLEN, RICHARD
1,704.70
wf
92059
01/17/03
MEYERS, PAUL
1,045.60
wf
92060
01/17/03
MILLER, NICHOLAS
1,621.00
wf
92061
01/17/03
MONK, JOHN
858.00
13
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
14
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
92062
01/17/03
MONROY, JON
L817.90
wf
92063
01/17/03
NALIPINSKI, STEPHEN
1,167.40
wf
92064
01/17/03
NOLAN, PAUL
910.80
wf
92065
01/17/03
NOVAK, JEROME
3 9.60
wf
92066
01/17/03
OLSON, KENNETH
1,293.60 .
wf
92067
01/17/03
PETERSON, RICHARD
690.00
wf
92068
01/17/03
PETERSON, ROBERT
79.20
wf
92069
01/17/03
PETERSON, THEODORE
849.60
wf
92070
01/17/03
PLANK, DANIEL
1,320.00
wf
92071
01/17/03
REYNOSO, ANGEL
264.00
wf
92072
01/17/03
RICKETSON, BRENT
132.00
wf
92073
01/17/03
RIDER, JEFFREY
1,008.00
wf
92074
01/17/03
RINDAL, DONALD
1
wf
92075
01/17/03
ROMANIK, JAMES
1,491.60
wf
92076
01/17/03
SACKETT, JAMES
1,417.20
wf
92077
01/17/03
SCHADT, JEFFREY
1,765.70
wf
92078
01/17/03
SCHOENECKER, THOMAS
1,122.10
wf
92079
01/17/03
SCHULTZ, THOMAS
987.60
wf
92080
01/17/03
SEDLACEK, JEFFREY
1,153.70
wf
92081
01/17/03
SEVERSON, DAVID
871.20
wf
92082
01/17/03
SINGER, SCOTT
343.20
wf
92083
01/17/03
SKOK, STEPHEN
1,397.30
wf
92084
01/17/03
SMITH, KEITH
1
wf
92085
01/17/03
SMITH, RICHARD
1
wf
92086
01/17/03
SOLHEID, DALE
264.00
wf
92087
01/17/03
STELLA, JAMES
672.00
wf
92088
01/17/03
STENE, MARK
1,227.60
wf
92089
01/17/03
TRONNES, JOHN
264.00
wf
92090
01/17/03
WATERS, JOSEPH
2,319.90
wf
92091
01/17/03
WELDON, ROBERT
937.20
wf
92092
01/17/03
WHISLER, MICHAEL
103.20
wf
92093
01/17/03
WHITE, JOEL
514.80
wf
92094
01/17/03
WOJSKI, EDWARD
40.00
wf
92095
01/17/03
OLINGER, SHELLEY
L823.58
wf
92096
01/17/03
FREBERG, RONALD
1,908.98
wf
92097
01/17/03
JONES, DONALD
1
wf
92098
01/17/03
ELIAS, JAMES
2,206.04
wf
92099
01/17/03
JAROSCH, JONATHAN
212.31
wf
92100
01/17/03
EDSON, DAVID
2,010.82
wf
92101
01/17/03
GOODRICH, CHAD
342.75
wf
92102
01/17/03
HELEY, ROLAND
1
wf
92103
01/17/03
HINNENKAMP, GARY
1
wf
92104
01/17/03
LINDORFF, DENNIS
1,724.23
wf
92105
01/17/03
NAUGHTON, RYAN
45.00
wf
92106
01/17/03
NOVAK, MICHAEL
1,564.65
wf
92107
01/17/03
GERNES, CAROLE
237.50
14
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
15
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
92108
01/17/03
BUNCE, LARRY
1
Wf
92109
01/17/03
ADAMS, CAILIN
87.00
Wf
92110
01/17/03
ANDERSEN, ERIC
24.00
wf
92111
01/17/03
ANZALDI, THOMAS
338.00
Wf
92112
01/17/03
BANICK, PETER
21.00
wf
92113
01/17/03
BOTHWELL, KRISTIN
48.75
Wf
92114
01/17/03
CHEZIK, STACEY
19.50
Wf
92115
01/17/03
DAVISON, LINCOLN
527.00
Wf
92116
01/17/03
DEGREE, AMANDA
246.00
Wf
92117
01/17/03
DRESSEN, EMILY
21.00
Wf
92118
01/17/03
FEUCHT, KENNETH
80.00
Wf
92119
01/17/03
FRANK, SARAH
19.50
Wf
92120
01/17/03
GORE, MICHAEL
55.00
Wf
92121
01/17/03
GREENER, DOUGLAS
45.00
wf
92122
01/17/03
HARGROVE, CAYLA
22.50
Wf
92123
01/17/03
HAWKES, SCOTT
30.00
Wf
92124
01/17/03
HOIUM, PHILIP
144.00
Wf
92125
01/17/03
HOLDER, RYAN
60.00
Wf
92126
01/17/03
HORNER, JAY
45.00
wf
92127
01/17/03
HORNER, KIMBERLY
13.00
wf
92128
01/17/03
JAW ORSKI, ERIC
33.00
Wf
92129
01/17/03
JOHNSON, SARA
19.50
wf
92130
01/17/03
KLEM, JOSH
106.00
Wf
92131
01/17/03
LANDE, JOSEPH
14.50
wf
92132
01/17/03
LARSON, RYAN
32.25
wf
92133
01/17/03
LINDEMAN, BRETT
31.50
Wf
92134
01/17/03
LINDEMAN, LEO
45.00
Wf
92135
01/17/03
MANTALICA, LUKE
416.00
Wf
92136
01/17/03
MARTINUCCI, KAITLIN
19.50
Wf
92137
01/17/03
MILLER, SHELBY
19.50
wf
92138
01/17/03
NIEMCZYK, ANTHONY
39.00
Wf
92139
01/17/03
O'GRADY, ZACHARY
19.50
wf
92140
01/17/03
OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN
373.31
Wf
92141
01/17/03
RAYS, HOLLY
19.50
Wf
92142
01/17/03
RYDEL, RACHEL
19.50
wf
92143
01/17/03
SHOBERG, KARI
150.00
wf
92144
01/17/03
SIKORA, JACOB
36.00
wf
92145
01/17/03
SIKORA, LEAH
21.75
wf
92146
01/17/03
SIKORA, PAUL
75.00
Wf
92147
01/17/03
TARR -JR, GUS
41.00
Wf
92148
01/17/03
GERMAIN, DAVID
1,731.41
wf
92149
01/17/03
HAAG, MARK
1,641.69
wf
92150
01/17/03
NADEAU, EDWARD
2,628.52
wf
92151
01/17/03
BEHR, HEATHER
142.00
wf
92152
01/17/03
BROWN, LAURIE
106.50
wf
92153
01/17/03
DIAZ, SUSAN
384.65
15
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
wf
92154
01/17/03
DISKERUD, HEATHER
223.85
Wf
92155
01/17/03
GLASS, JEAN
1
Wf
92156
01/17/03
HOIUM, SHEILA
987.58
wf
92157
01/17/03
JACK, NICOLE
28.40
Wf
92158
01/17/03
MOFFAT, ETHAN
177.60
Wf
92159
01/17/03
MOY, PAMELA
401.64
Wf
92160
01/17/03
PARTLOW, JOSHUA
309.04
Wf
92161
01/17/03
RIDLEHOOVER, KATE
302.63
Wf
92162
01/17/03
SCHMIDT, RUSSELL
2,782.36
wf
92163
01/17/03
SHOBERG, CARY
689.48
Wf
92164
01/17/03
TOLBERT, FRANCINE
99.40
wf
92165
01/17/03
UNGER, MARGARET
743.73
Wf
92166
01/17/03
YOUNG, DILLON
522.60
wf
92167
01/17/03
ABRAHAMSON, DANIEL
78.60
wf
92168
01/17/03
ANDERSON, CALEB
29.25
wf
92169
01/17/03
BRENEMAN, NEIL'
78.81
Wf
92170
01/17/03
CASSELTON, JANE
34.38
Wf
92171
01/17/03
CHAPMAN, JENNY
305.15
Wf
92172
01/17/03
DIERICH, ANDREA
70.73
wf
92173
01/17/03
DUNN, RYAN
267.29
wf
92174
01/17/03
FENGER, JUSTIN
383.14
Wf
92175
01/17/03
FINNEGAN, KAREN
72.00
Wf
92176
01/17/03
FONTAINE, ANTHONY
31.80
Wf
92177
01/17/03
FONTAINE, KIM
391.68
Wf
92178
01/17/03
GRANT, MELISSA
94.98
wf
92179
01/17/03
GRUENHAGEN, LINDA
258.20
Wf
92180
01/17/03
HEINN, REBECCA
26.85
Wf
92181
01/17/03
HOLMGREN, LEAH
41.93
Wf
92182
01/17/03
HOULE, DENISE
210.00
wf
92183
01/17/03
HUPPERT, ERIN
179.00
wf
92184
01/17/03
IRISH, GRACE
114.63
Wf
92185
01/17/03
JOHNSON, ROBERT
69.45
Wf
92186
01/17/03
JOVONOVICH, TODD
36.00
wf
92187
01 /1 7/03
JOYER, MARTI
86.88
wf
92188
01/17/03
KERSCHNER, JOLENE
428.78
wf
92189
01/17/03
KROLL, MARK
96.00
Wf
92190
01/17/03
LINDSTROM AMANDA
126.75
wf
92191
01/17/03
MATHISEN -JR, DEAN
501.88
wf
92192
01/17/03
MCMAHON, MELISSA
135.98
wf
92193
01/17/03
MELCHER, ROBERT
52.00
wf
92194
01/17/03
MILLS, ANNE
73.61
wf
92195
01/17/03
MISEMER, BENJAMIN
22.75
wf
92196
01/17/03
MOES, EMILIA
96.90
wf
92197
01/17/03
MOSSONG, ANDREA
238.58
wf
92198
01/17/03
O'REAGAN, CHRISTINE
140.88
wf
92199
01/17/03
OLSON, MARGRET
118.63
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
17
CHECK #
CHECK DATE
EMPLOYEE NAME
AMOUNT
Wf
92200
01/17/03
OWEN, JONATHAN
128.50
Wf
92201
01/17/03
PALMER, JESSICA
8.25
Wf
92202
01/17/03
PEHOSKI, JOEL
351.90
Wf
92203
01/17/03
PROESCH, ANDY
68.78
wf
92204
01/17/03
RENSTROM, KEVIN
88.43
Wf
92205
01/17/03
SMITLEY, SHARON
250.30
Wf
92206
01/17/03
TUPY, HEIDE
36.00
Wf
92207
01/17/03
TUPY, MARCUS
202.18
Wf
92208
01/17/03
WAGNER, ERIC
198.00
Wf
92209
01/17/03
WARNER, CAROLYN
155.80
Wf
92210
01/17/03
WEDES, CARYL
83.40
Wf
92211
01/17/03
WELTER, ELIZABETH
149.15
Wf
92212
01/17/03
WHITE, NICOLE
50.93
wf
92213
01/17/03
WHITE, TIMOTHY
127.00
Wf
92214
01/17/03
WOODMAN, ALICE
40.00
Wf
92215
01/17/03
BOSLEY, CAROL
186.30
Wf
92216
01/17/03
BREITBACH, GARY
1,281.00
Wf
92217
01/17/03
ESALA, HOPE
19.50
Wf
92218
01/17/03
HAGSTROM, EMILY
24.00
Wf
92219
01/17/03
HANSEN, ANNA
84.00
Wf
92220
01/17/03
KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE
107.25
Wf
92221
01/17/03
ODDEN, JESSICA
12.00
Wf
92222
01/17/03
SHERRILL, CAITLIN
278.09
Wf
92223
01/17/03
BEHAN, JAMES
1,550.95
Wf
92224
01/17/03
CHIGINSKY, APRIL
170.93
wf
92225
01/17/03
COLLINS, ASHLEY
231.09
Wf
92226
01/17/03
DOBLAR, STEVE
73.03
Wf
92227
01/17/03
DOUGLASS, TOM
1
wf
92228
01/17/03
KYRK, ASHLEY
30.20
wf
92229
01/17/03
LOGAN, HEATHER
50.80
Wf
92230
01/17/03
PATTERSON, ALBERT
1,031.00
wf
92231
01/17/03
PIEPER, THEODORE
79.38
Wf
92232
01/17/03
SARPONG, SEAN
209.08
wf
92233
01/17/03
SCHULZE, BRIAN
235.90
wf
92234
01/17/03
SEVERSON, HOLLY
67.05
Wf
92235
01/17/03
ZIEMER, NICOLE
20.55
Wf
92236
01/17/03
MULVANEY, DENNIS
1,898.29
522,887.18
17
AGENDA r MM NQ
Action by Council �
MEMORANDUM
Date
DATE: January 15, 2003 1lrcA ;
Rej ected
TO: Richard Fursman
City Manager
)U---
FROM: Sherrie Le
Human Resource Director
SUBJECT: Police Civil Service Commission Reappointment
Clayton Robinson was appointed May 13, 2002 to the Police Civil Service
Commission to fill the rest of Commissioner juenemann 7 s three -year term. Council
Member Kathy Juenemann resigned from the Commission to be sworn into office as
a City Council Member. Her term as Commissioner was to expire on December 31,
2002. This term has now expired and Mr. Robinson is interested in being considered
for reappointment to a full three -year term. This term would expire on December 31,
2005.
1
Agenda #
Minn by Council
MEMORANDUM -
Date.
nda. ?
TO: City Manager l�e�
FROM: Ken Roberts and Shann Finwall, Associate Planners
Rejected
SUBJECT: Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board
Reappointments
DATE: January 13, 2003
INTRODUCTION
At the end of 2002, the terms expired for the following planning commission and community
design review board members:
Planning Commission
Member
William Rossbach
Gary Pearson
Jackie Monahan -Junek
Appointment Date
10 -10 -89
12 -10 -90
3 -11 -02
All above- mentioned commissioners wish to have the city council reappoint them to the planning
commission for another three years.
Community Design Review Board
Member Appointment Date
Matt Ledvina 3 -10 -97
Linda Olson 3 -26 -01
Diana Longrie -Kline 5 -28 -02
All above- mentioned board members wish to have the city council reappoint them to the
community design review board for another two years.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Reappoint Mr. Rossbach, Mr. Pearson and Ms. Monahan -Junek to serve on the planning
commission for another three years. These terms would end on December 31, 2005.
Reappoint Mr. Ledvina, Ms. Olson and Ms. Longrie -Kline to serve on the community design
review board for another two years. These terms would end January 1, 2005.
p:miscell /pcterms.03 (6.1 appts.)
AGENDA
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Action b Council
Date
Endorsed
Modified
Richard Fursman, Cit Mana Re
Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation
Januar 21, 2003 for the Januar 27 Cit Council Meetin
Park and Recreation Commission Reappointments
The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission has nine .members who serve three-
y ear terms. There are three commissioners currentl up for reappointment: Don
Christianson, Audre Duellman and Rick Brandon.
I have forwarded a letter to each of these commissioners re their interest in
servin on the commission for an additional three- term. Each of the commissioners
has responded in the affirmative and it is staffs recommendation that Commissioners
Brandon, Christianson and Duellman be reappointed to the Maplewood Parks and
Recreation Commission for a three- term effective 2003-2005.
Should y ou have an q uestions re the reappointments, please contact me at ext.
4573.
WreanDointmentsOlmem
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM r,
Action by Council
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: January 21, 2003
RE: Cigarette and Tobacco Annual Renewals
.r
Rejected
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY
COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following Cigarette and Tobacco Licenses, having been previously
duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 2003.
A -1 Liquor, Inc.
Fast Break
Lor Liquor Store
19 Century Avenue South
3001 White Bear Avenue
1347 Frost Avenue
AMF Maplewood Bowl
Fleming's Auto
MGM Liquor Warehouse
1955 English Street
2271 White Bear Avenue
2950 White Bear Avenue
Bennigan's
Freedom Valu Center
M & M, #1,, Inc.
1745 Beam Avenue
1535 Beam Avenue
1700 Rice Street
Best Western Maplewood Inn
Garrity's Inc.
Maplewood Amoco
1780 East County Road D
1696 White Bear Avenue
1987 County Road D East
Bleecher's
Go Fr It Gas
Maplewood Moose Lodge
2220 White Bear Avenue
27 Century Avenue North
1946 English Street
Budget Service of MN, Inc.
Hilltop Foods, Inc.
Maplewood Wine Cellar
223 E. Larpenteur Avenue
2150 McMenemy Street
1281 Frost Avenue
Budget Service of MN, Inc.
Holiday Station
Oasis Market
1291 Frost Avenue
743 N. Century Avenue
2168 White Bear Avenue
Century Avenue Service
Holiday Station
Oasis Market
9 Century Avenue South
280 McKnight Road South
1285 Cope Avenue
Chalet Lounge and
Keller Clubhouse
Party Time Liquor
Restaurant
2166 Maplewood Drive
1835 E. Larpenteur Avenue
1820 Rice Street
Keller Lake Convenience
Rainbow Foods
Champp's Bar & Grill
2228 Highway 61
2501 White Bear Avenue
1734 Adolphus
Knowlan's Super Markets,
Richard's Market
Cub Foods
Inc.
1344 Frost Avenue
2390 White Bear Avenue
2720 Stillwater Road
The Rock Night Club
Cub Foods
Laber's Liquors
2029 Woodlynn Avenue
100 West County Road B
1700 D Rice Street
Sarrack's International Wine
Dean's Tavern
Les's Superette
2305 Stillwater Road
1986 Rice Street
2665 White Bear Avenue
Shinde
3 000 Bear Avenue
Sid's Discount Liquor
2515 White Bear Avenue
Sinclair Retail
2158 Rice Street
Smiley's D. G. Burgers
2425 Highway 61
Stargate Bar & Dance Club
1700 Rice Street, Suites J &K
Superamerica
11 Century Avenue South
Superamerica
2529 White Bear Avenue
Tobacco fl, Inc.
2303 White Bear Avenue
Tobacco Palace
705 Century Avenue North
Tom Thumb
27 Century Avenue North
Tom Thumb
1690 McKnight Road North
Walgreen's
2515 White Bear Avenue
White Bear Tobacco, Inc.
23 03 White Bear Ave.
Yocum Food Mart
2729 Stillwater Road
Z &NGo For It
27 N. Century Avenue
Superamerica
1750 White Bear Avenue
Agenda #
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
Richard Fursman, City Manager
Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit Review
Mounds Park Academy
2051 Larpenteur Avenue
January 21, 2003
INTRODUCTION
r
Action by Council r
The conditional use permit (CUP) for Mounds Park Academy is due for review. Refer to the maps on
- pages 2 through 5.
BACKGROUND
On April 27,1992,' the city council approved a revision to the CUP for Mounds Park Academy to build
two additions and expand their recreation areas.
Can November 14 'i 994, the city council reviewed the CUP for Mounds Park Academy. The city
council required a review in six months, after Independent School District 622 completed their
proposed access road to Beebe Road, or in' three years, whichever came first.
On June 12,1995,' the-city council approved a CUP and design review for Independent School District.
622: This was so the school district could expand their parking lot and reroute their driveway to Beebe
Road.
On January 8, 2001, the city council approved a revision to the CU for Mounds Park Academy. This
approval was for the school to build an addition between their existing building and the former school
district building at 1801 Beebe Road. This approval was subject to seven conditions (see the
January 8, 2001, city council minutes starting on page 6).
On January 14, 2002, the city council reviewed the CUP for Mounds Park Academy. The city council
required a review in one year to allow Mounds Park Academy to complete construction of the addition
and install all required landscaping.
DISCUSSION
The school completed the construction of the approved addition last fall. All required exterior
improvements, including landscaping and repair of the screening fence, have been completed.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit (CUP) for Mounds Park Academy at 2051 Larpenteur Avenue again
only if a problem arises or if a revision to the CUP or an expansion to the school is proposed.
P\secl 4\moundsparkacademy
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Full Site Plan
4. Partial* Site Plan
5. January 8, 2001 , City Council Minutes
ATTACHMENT
5vz !- ; , i W
Wo
Cn arc
MAR
POND r 1 i e ( P) PIRIVArE SM T.
.
x Co
> RD
.�8,. N : ••.. 25 Z .
W OH L MA N AV ...
(MYSSABI AV)
Z ~ N
ar
a v Harrel wood �o`
o
NORTH SA !N T PA UL
2 Pk
cc
v
z `�
Co > RD 2 C"
st *N
�.
T29N,R72W
OYy f fall =:
4
Z
w 3c
W J
3�2
KRIS
0 EDG
HILL RD 10111
o �
' QQ.
N
W =
,
Al
DE MONT
AV
NORTH
SAINT PAUL
' 28
N
R SSE . �
X00 2 9
68
30
AV
o
O
z
ELE E
)y :
h
fA N T
:. :: ........
four
pJ AV
W
XTAN T AV
Seasons
0 Hillside J
Pk F-
N
�
Z w
121
RIP
Pk
RIP
AV
W21-
�
0 Q
GERVA IS
r-
G EM AI G£ RVA1S AN
VIEW
z
AV _
Y J
,�.�
CT
N G
DR Y .
o. LAKE
z
_
TLE AV
= PRICE A -'
°�
Knuckle Head L oke
G aS � E AY
` Cliff
�.•---- -�-� -�
,
COPE
AV
..ARPENTEUR
N en
2
f,4 Cn
N ~
x :.
•
gc
RD.
O
x�� L.A R I E RD
2 he RZ
° Z
J RST
¢ z
A
_ a
O
x Co
> RD
.�8,. N : ••.. 25 Z .
o f�Ivbinhood
g
AV
st *N
�.
W
OYy f fall =:
KRIS
o �
' QQ.
AV
N ROSEWOOD
Al
S AV
NORTH
SAINT PAUL
' 28
R SSE . �
X00 2 9
68
AY
o
O
HOLLO
>
h
P
:. :: ........
:.......... :...:
S UM R
W
I QP
GoodrlcA
0 Hillside J
Pk F-
N
�'`,
e
Z w
121
RIP
PA
�
S A
RIP
AV
W21-
�
z z
r-
VAfClrl LD
Y J
,�.�
_ KINGSTON
_ ............._
o. LAKE
z
2
= PRICE A -'
°�
Y
W
` Cliff
,
MC KNIGHT L
..ARPENTEUR
2
m
x :.
LOCATION MAP
z
4
N
F
SOMEMEN so-so ■•■■■■ _►� ■�
- - ♦ WILLIAMS M S DI RE t: N£ CO. c 5 w
Gam) _?) "1 ;.) ;�') C=�) OkL) 1792. " I 1 14 0 3 5�. `� W • e f �t� - Q Li - - " - - - - :. 3_ SI
7 A '9 10 11 12 13 14 4 �"' ^: e12V.i844- - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - ■-
178s -� 783 ;.: f- p 1 N D S - Of
K 1. ■
1760 = ■
1 ,, 5
22 2 ZO ; 19 18 17 16 15
ls�) (.:�e) CL+) . (LO) 1772 �
i
AV E
o MA PLEW 0E
1 -7.5 1766 J 3t ■
+. Cot : �+ • • t4+j �4!) ;iD) f ar 1 1 !
1758. ��' tk3} 1
7 e' 9 10 11 12 13 r o
1752
t 2ND ■ A[
1
�Z 2 2 19 ' :s 17 16 1744 '�.� �.
;s�) (t71 `r:; :ss' qty 's3) ���•41 �� MLJLUJ
,. 173 s N �/ ■..�
/ j a� 2, - T1 1
AV E.
GQ s�- i! »C. • to
Q - "F'. 14 .►,
��"� �r,1i A to V
v V w cc
7 8 9 1 G rt
13 2'1722 Q7 w
• 200 - � � , . o� -�., •- > t— O � `� E `� T
- 12 3' 1714" 0 2
-.
OGO 111 12 I I ` 1708 4
:w) •`� �. .bGot ,$Gas 3•S' -
13 � 10 5 1700. % '•-- � J v
( v. ) u � �•�.���. I�AAPLEWOOD'
010 ozo
'= 1.4 z ( ' s 's 6 16194 88 .. ra PUMP STATION
Q -►
Tmw
1s cn 8 7 .16 : 2025 202
1 2 C;0 . J -3
. 2095
LARPENTEUR AV
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
a
O
f ....
N .
° 194 L78 -
E ti3
w. 4. L3
its
-
I A
�yr
%
�
i ■■■s ■ ■■■■■nMEN X1
�0
A.
- t' Z6 w, t soorr "
V
J
(4.0 3 e•C.} w •. e o
f '
a o
1
ARCHER HEIGHTS
c
APARTMENTS 8�4
\
y
G ! 1 l J,
P D /
L
4 v •`
o
a a-
SOMEMEN so-so ■•■■■■ _►� ■�
- - ♦ WILLIAMS M S DI RE t: N£ CO. c 5 w
Gam) _?) "1 ;.) ;�') C=�) OkL) 1792. " I 1 14 0 3 5�. `� W • e f �t� - Q Li - - " - - - - :. 3_ SI
7 A '9 10 11 12 13 14 4 �"' ^: e12V.i844- - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - ■-
178s -� 783 ;.: f- p 1 N D S - Of
K 1. ■
1760 = ■
1 ,, 5
22 2 ZO ; 19 18 17 16 15
ls�) (.:�e) CL+) . (LO) 1772 �
i
AV E
o MA PLEW 0E
1 -7.5 1766 J 3t ■
+. Cot : �+ • • t4+j �4!) ;iD) f ar 1 1 !
1758. ��' tk3} 1
7 e' 9 10 11 12 13 r o
1752
t 2ND ■ A[
1
�Z 2 2 19 ' :s 17 16 1744 '�.� �.
;s�) (t71 `r:; :ss' qty 's3) ���•41 �� MLJLUJ
,. 173 s N �/ ■..�
/ j a� 2, - T1 1
AV E.
GQ s�- i! »C. • to
Q - "F'. 14 .►,
��"� �r,1i A to V
v V w cc
7 8 9 1 G rt
13 2'1722 Q7 w
• 200 - � � , . o� -�., •- > t— O � `� E `� T
- 12 3' 1714" 0 2
-.
OGO 111 12 I I ` 1708 4
:w) •`� �. .bGot ,$Gas 3•S' -
13 � 10 5 1700. % '•-- � J v
( v. ) u � �•�.���. I�AAPLEWOOD'
010 ozo
'= 1.4 z ( ' s 's 6 16194 88 .. ra PUMP STATION
Q -►
Tmw
1s cn 8 7 .16 : 2025 202
1 2 C;0 . J -3
. 2095
LARPENTEUR AV
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
a
O
ATTACHMENT 3 ,
1
vrIN v E
FULL SITE PLAN
4
/ •• 1 _
A JA
see =ss
I j I •t Lam° ��• �. •�� � ��
�'�� • ''�iwt: � ='; �i:;.•,� III � / t � �_,.�^• -•��; \
• `: t '� LOCATION OF
• '.,
THE PROPOSED
, ONNECTIN G. LIN
I V A
IJ
4
N
ATTACHMENT 4
f�
7
CAW
re
19 9
fic UAW
FORMER
SCHOOL DISTRICT
BUILDING
lo
\
ow va
� ,`
rC O ,\
1�
---- • - - -- -- - - -- - --
.
-, v.
XW4 am
•�
4! \
a. `
,
ow
ws
ra.s
w
Ac VWm
G
v
0.
•cid
Iva
Z
0
PROPOSED
CONNECTING LINK
i
PARTIAL SITE PLAN
s
aim
.` we i
rvm lobo
° /' Kamm
a
n rx •
4
N
Attachment 5
MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, January 8, 2001
Council Chambers, Municipal Building,
Meeting No. 01 -01
3.
'7:30 P.M. (8:3 P.M.) Mounds Park Academy (2051 Larpenteur Avenue and 1801
Beebe Road)
Conditional Use Permit
Design Approval
.a: Mayor Cardinal convened the meeting for a public hearing.
b. City Manager Fursman introduced the' staff report.
C. Community Development Director Coleman presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Jack Frost presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Cardinal - opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Myron Carlson, Business Manager for Mounds Park Academy, the
Applicant
Don Palony, 1.758 Ruth Street, Maplewood
f. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing.-
CouncilmembOr Koppen, I to adopt the following resolution annrovin� the
conditional -use hermit revision for Mounds Park Academy:
RESOLUTION 01-01-005
CONDITIONAL USE" PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION.
WHEREAS, Mounds Park Academy requested a revision of their conditional use
permit.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2051 Larpenteur Avenue East and 1.801 Beebe
Road. The legal description is:
Tracts A. D, E, F, G and H. of Land Survey No. 396, Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. The planning. commission discussed the conditional use permit revision on
6
r
December 18, 2000. They recommended. that the city council approve the
revision.
2. The city council held a public hearing on January 8, 2000. City staff
published a notice in. the paper and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports and recommendations -of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the
above- described conditional use permit revision for the following reasons:
1. The use .would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated.
to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of
Ordinances.
. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and
would not create traffic congestion or' unsafe access on existing or
proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by. adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and
sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or
services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's.
natural. and scenic. features into the development design.
90' The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
7
Approval is subject to the following .conditions:
1. All construction must comply with the. site .plan, date - stamped November
17 2000. The city council may approve major changes. The director of
community development may approve minor changes
2.. The city council shall review this permit revision one year from the date of
approval, based on the procedure in the city code.
3. The school shall turn the tennis court lights off by 9:00 p.m. Only the
school shall use the tennis court lights.
4. The school shall only use the area between .the tennis . courts. and pond and
the west lot line as a track or route. for running during fall. and. spring
cross- country meets.
.50 The city council may reconsider the need for the school to open .the
driveway to Beebe Road from time to time.
6. The city council requires that the school keep the westerly access at Price
Avenue barricaded, except for emergency- vehicle access.
70 The wooden screening fence shall be kept in-good repair.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
Councilmember Koppen moved to annrove the design plans date - stamped
November, 17, 2000 for the nronosed addition to Mounds Park Academy. based
_Qn the findings rQquired by the code. The i2rwerty owner shall do the followi
10 Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit
for this project..
20 Before obtaining a building permit for the addition, the property owner
shall:
a. Provide staff with evidence that their two. properties_ have been J
combined into one legally - described lot..
b. Review with staff the need for additional. screening on the east side
of the northerly building and of the proposed addition. The
applicant shall provide screening as may be required by staff.
3 Complete the following. before occupying the building ' addition:
a. Repair. or replace any broken or missing parts of the wooden
8
screening fence.
b. Restore all ground that is disturbed by the proposed construction.
c. Comply with previous landscaping -plan requirements.
d. Provide screening on the east side of the site if required by staff.
4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy
if
a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare:
b. The city receives a cash escrow, or an irrevocable letter of credit for
the required work. The amount shall be.1 %2 times the cost of the
unfinished work. Any . unfinished landscaping shall be completed
by June 1 if - the building is occupied in the fall or winter or within
six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring or summer.
50 All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community
development may. approve minor changes.
J
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes - all
9
Agenda.
MEMORANDUM
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
INTRODUC'
City Manager
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Conditional Use Permit — Accessory Building
2776 Keller Parkway
.January 7, 2003
TION
Action bY.Counca
ad
Mr. Ron Brown is asking for city approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for an over -sized
accessory structure on his property at 2776 Keller Parkway: Mr. Brown has a detached garage
with alean -to or carport on the rear (north) side. The total roof area of this structure is about
1,515 square feet. (See the maps on pages 5 through 8). Mr. Brown uses the garage and carport
to store his personal property including cars, a trailer, a lawn mower and a garden tractor (see
the applicant's statement on page 9).
Request
Mr. Brown. is requesting that the city council approve a conditional use permit (CU )- to- have -an-
accessory structure that exceeds the ' size limits set by the city code.. On a lot the size of Mr.
Brown's property, . the . code allows a maximum of square feet for the combined area of the
accessory structures and no accessory structure may exceed 1,250 square feet. The maximum
height of accessory structures is limited to 16 feet; measured from grade to the mid point .of the
roof. The garage and carport exceed the maximum size limit by 266 square feet in area. The
code allows the city council to approve a CUP to increase the'area or height. of an. accessory
building.
1 BACKGROUND
Garage and Carport Construction
Mr. Brown built.the carport on the garage without receiving a permit from the city. It was after the
city received 'a complaint and Mr. Brown applied for a building permit that staff discovered that
the garage and carport exceeded the city code. size standards for an accessory structure. Mr.
Brown has applied to the city for all necessary zoning and building permits.
Currently, the garage and carport are complete. '1f the city council approves the CUP, city staff
may issue Mr. Brown his building. permit for these structures. If the city council denies the CUP
request, then Mr. Brown must remove the carport to make the accessory structure meet the city
size requirements.
DISCUSSION
Similar. Uses
The city council has approved CUPs for other over -sized garages and accessory buildings in the
past. The council, however, must look at each case on an individual basis and decide on the
meats of each application as they come forward.
Mr. Brown's- Request
In this case, the existing garage and carport do not negatively affect the neighbors and are not
causing a problem. Mr. Brown's property is in neat condition and keeping the garage and carport
as they are will help Mr. Brown continue to keep his property in an orderly fashion.
David .Fisher, 'the Maplewood building official, noted that the city would require the building to
meet all code requirements and that the city will collect a double fee for the building permit.
Summary
The garage and carport are near the rear of the property (near county open space) .and onl
visible to one adjacent neighbor. The garage and carport have not negatively impacted the
surrounding properties and, in fact, have resulted in a neater, cleaner property. Also, all of the
neighbors that responded to our survey were in favor of this proposal (see page 4 ).
COMMISSION ACTION
On January 6, 2003, the planning commission recommended approval of the conditional use
permit.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution on pages. 10 and 11. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for
an accessory structure (garage and carport) that is 1,515 square feet in area for the property at
2776- Keller parkway. The city is approving this permit based on the findings listed in the
resolution and the unique circumstances of this situation. This approval shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. All -construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve minor changes.
2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits from. the city.
3. The owner shall not use. the garage and carport for commercial or business activities
unless the city council approves such a request.
4.. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council in one year..
2
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the property owners- within 350 feet of this site to get their opinions of
Mr. Brown's request. Out of 14 properties, we received 5 replies.that were all were in favor of
the proposal.
1. We have no objections to Ron Browns' request for his detached garage and carport.
(Glasow — 897 Kohiman Lane)
2.. Mr. Brown's property is not in view from my property. There are woods between us" Also,
the properties at 2756 Keller and 897 Kohlman have dual garage situations anyway. Mr.
Brown.seems to keep his area clean. We have no issues with this permit. (Laurner —
2764 Keller Parkway)
.3. We, the next -door neighbors, have absolutely no- objections 'to Ron Brown's request. It
-does not obstruct any views, it is not unattractive and he maintains it very meticulously.
(Renner — 2780 Keller Parkway)
4. 1 have no objections to this carport and see no reason why Mr. Brown should not receive
the permit. (Benker - 2786 Keller Parkway)
5. This proposal is OK with me. Mr. Brown is responsible and keeps a neat property.
(Rethke — 2828 Keller Parkway)
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size: . 0,791 acres (34,456 square feet)
Existing
Land Use: Single Family Home and detached garage
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Ramsey County Open Space
East: Single dwellings
South: Cervais Lake across Keller Parkway
Vilest: Single dwellings
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 36 -77(a) allows a maximum of 2,250 square feet of combined accessory structure area
with no one accessory structure exceeding 1 ,250 square feet.
Section 36 -77(c) allows the city council to approve a conditional use permit to increase the area
or height of an accessory building.
3
CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL
Section 36-442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards..
(See findings 1 -9 in the resolution. on pages 10 and 1.1.)
APPLICATION DATE
Mr. Brown submitted his complete application on November 18, 2002. The usual required 60�
day deadline for decisions on this CUP is January .17 2003. -Mr. Brown, however, has agreed to
a time eaten* sion for the city to decide about his request.
Kr/p: SecA 2776 Keller Parkway
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3: Area Map
4. Site Plan
5. Applicants Statement
6. CUP Resolution
4
Attachment 1
VADNAIS HEIGHTS
1 � COUNTY
11�/� 61
1 , - -I
fr-
V)
HIGHRIDGE CT. 4
Q ca
W r.
w
J LYDIA AVE.
SUM-MIT CT
T
2. COU NTRYVIEW
3. DULUTH ' CT.
BEAM AVE. -AM 19
07
LL
0
c
�. Kohiman .
c�- Q . z
Gervai Lake v
Lake � �i
K 0 hl LMAN r.� AVE.
Uj
COUNTY ROAD
• HILL �C� _ .
• I PLAZA CIR 323 V ,
2 - ALVAR�tC�t� DR � S�
PALM •
3 SELLEDREST DR � � °�` Trailer 0 �� �` C � �
4 DEAUVILLE DR CT. p� Ck�. 1' Court
w .
5 MERIDIAN OR � 5 2 E7 C7'
CO CO' 4 3 CON OR w .
CT. DEMa AVE.. A VE. w
r—
22)
Li LL1 Hart
BR OKS
LLJ
O
t
SEXTANT
1 AVE. �
2 40 0 60 �, ✓ GERVAIS AVE.
Poo 36
Ln
,,•
COPE CT. COPE
II4G DR. �,. Keller ' +`
cr (n w w 60, 5) Lake C.O. RD. ac
Lj
Uj
w
F t
• ' •rte r LEL ANC RD. 4
z - LAURIE CT.
• `) / F -11
LOCATION
5
4
N
R �
Attachment Z
J C-t2�- / �, Z S �- \D Z 340.1 7
3
.;,1"ts3� -•' �� °z' � � �� � • � 9 / 1 � X281
.. 1• i . 5 3 o..c,. 4 • / '�
a
5,6
Lis 143 lT3,o ,e 9 (2 9) ,
5
.t. RPM SF-Y ov N-r
2Qa� 0 G `/
75 . (4-t) J
\ COUNTY DtTcH 1 7
0 p POND i �� 7 C�2,
' N Q Q n CITY OPEN SPACE m 0 1
ITS cp Z. cc
/ 9 �•
1980
db-
GOV ' LOT I
RAM -iEy COUNTY OPEN SPACE �.
zo
282 (� A,
Jae
LO
2$00 a 0 O p Ste• ti�
O C .
N �y so y 37
I8.4 �'�� �' 9�c. '• p
al 1 � ih
1 2786 / P t -= o 00
5 6 ti
� 2776 r2
9 l 5 0�. / / 47
SIP
�t /
�o
� 11
C o
.2770
.05
-8�
2 c, Goy
Z CO \2 .3 Z o x,48
e
• � ti ,, a+7 �j � . Co O.C. ; � • .S i
2764
t � • 201 X99 `� � �'
o 2756 , 28 °•'
$ p 2 I � 5 • ��
t
> 5z PT io
-
3 3� • J ,
'•
( 2ar) '� •��
ro
3%.10
' ~ I h
'' � �4. 52
2 ate
�
GERMS LAKE o
�
r .
PI
A3S 90 +4r.5fb�
1 n, 5630"
R -- 2J9.6' �+vJ'
°j.�2 �r
R 370.78
V(
N A Irm 04,
ci
^t
I RF.Z
19
44 I.b8
G OV
/
LOT
r
Attach 4
f f , � elf•^ - 1 _- i t"'•ti.. / /�' /j• ,
r f `44I `''
11 j •_„`j•' / ' r• J /r''� -., !! f f •,`. t %' / / - f ! % ..1 j � ( � / r
J / ,J + '1 °•... f _ - ,. may t � ; � ,' / r
""" _ i r � %' ..,,a,J (/ l .. _ '� ...f•' :! r - J ..1' �' I fr. / J ' 'j ,' ' J � � �""�•...., � / f ;x'.,, ` F
^ 'z.. r �; ...�. r f � .�,• / l � f l r w .,,,� l ;r ; 1 %• 'J''`••.
f `�...! `�. 1 t .�� /// � � '�.`' -� y f � .. f • ..f , ! ie , . /' f' �� JJJ f , _� � •'• `
..'••p r � ` J �, ` -"w•, •+.. i , f � 1 it 1 , J • - .q l . ' 'w `1 tr j ^�•.,.� � :.... �,/ .f .,,_ �/• / i _.
J f`l `1•"., z��M -� �`"•..„� r.�1y ••,,., / /r // _^.. 15 �� .�- f � ! �.,, r�ww -.., f - "�i.._� / %t.. -t ! 1
./. _ 'i ;/r - / -_,� / (• . -"_..j f t - `"` / ! F l• �•.. /• ••```,�••- f ;�. r ��� %% �'•�•�., ��- � ft ••f. `_ � - � ~•���� l
- f y / - Jt J r 7 y � . / `•^- " "�.,. 1 ,( '``•....f '(' {•`y `�. ^� / ( , -. r ! ` J , i .. r ' r ` l / • f f •
• "' ri ..t. • ; _ �' 1 �� - f , ��t'w,,.�f /•� -_ f r '�.. ` ` ! ' i % � ''�� � f • % 1 r . I � J %� . i i
1 1 ( � J+ � • �.. J i J j 1 `" -.. i , "^•.���� ry e.... l 1 - •...� j i J J 7 t � , � ,
• .. / •� -!`- .,,� 'I( ;..,, r fJ� y j t/ •.. <, f � � •`,,~I (' J --v_~. ! %s -/ � - ^�:.,,�� ,r { •�`. j �C ' �/ ; %•" % L .
k_ - / �' ;' ,! w .,,,� � •�,= 3, f -;'• ; '- -.;.�. � ,''�- ... f --� � -'� ; . �,• -- `� .
� ' ,.1 �' s �J - -�� i r �`�' l % ' l i - � _ � � � .. `•••.,.,.h i t `! ' y :.., - J '``�, f l i - 6 � , _ .
' ���'• ,.� `!l ..f - l f • •n.fr a f .`'" may. � f'.`...:.. :� ••,., / •`� ��' i t /l 7 / ```•.� �� / J } ^`� - / - "fir+..,, M1 `/ � .: r j ,.
} °'�wf i 1 ,- j e,,, �'s: �,,,�� � { ..., ,• t f t' F4
'• �'� {. f' ' �.�� ..r (w'. it 1 ! l .�f ! �/ J ,� \.
f
it
� ��"- �i � • � •••,, � -,.f � ►` "' .,,,,'�e,,,� - •. f , " -,.l • � .' f; r �; • _ I � f / .. �"•� f -• j � * �'~•'�... Ate. % - � ,. ` j • " " '• � - +i / I f
+ l to r ~ / . t `r��~I f ` / r J -°.. / ... / ~"- f ` • '"•�,_ / `"` -•..1 J
../ � I ,,,.SRS _ / F -�, ->r ` f •y. �..�! 1 �t•.,, �, �'�' ., . ,, ,,,_ / J_ / t r( `..� • '
_ •,! ' �` ._.,/ / .. . � � ���e_� `�• � i °'+•.:._ i i / ". -..,,_ ! ' � ` , I '� �/`1•__ hw �' ! ' e � � f •`) --.. �`'w�,` '�...."Y ... /
.,; , % `' .. � ! ' �:'<..� f / j ` '. f ' ,�,,� p�( / /...n./ a....,,. t < j r. I� J . ; J% ••`- 'tjl �v;� 1 ' w ..,� ! - ^ ti
^` t �� r ' �..1.!' � •." ^•:.,.ti ,., f t �i/� r� /' 1 - �' r :• ' ,� - •.'. / ( � - �,, / . `i-• '�/ / ��+ / � ' ,.
../� /� ' � ' f •', yI(j � ^w r i �.�1 f I " ' ..
r. ! r' r t, .I .,,,_, 1' �` ,.. f ' f .. �•/+, �. ! `A
Ar
- i. -../Q _ l •. 1 . / ,� `/ .
I t
�`..�`"'+ / � J f i 1! 't'.i -'•.. •'� ..� M1 ` �`� � f J' i -,..,� T/ - � �, I A{µ ! ) "+Y � J 1 1 ! •. "W., f � - � .,..-
"'' f ° i+•.. i /( f ; I- ..�... �� �`" ...� 1 Y+ f Q f�' ..�,�'' ' /•� .•. �ll(� �_ f K ,_ J i f i' . f � t f ( f '•`- _ /
>•.t:.. /J , 1.. .~• 1< l' J' +. "....f i `•-+.. I 1! z --.. f r .. !' ` i r f r f I t/�
'• / I� .! l � t � „! i � t � !• -,�,. '%•••." / I ^., f / '' _ r i
y
lI '�f, l: ,i r �• ' . • j . r/ . -'!• _� J J " /'' :� � !� • . i ; ! 7, ' f j _ / .t
• � • • � �� f /l I .. � `. if ...1�'
1
J
i � �HAt� F /dfs Nor�s aKl��7t•��� �7fFTiNG Nc,> aOTECTic
APPLICANTEMENT
'S STAT
Attachment 6
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,' Ronald Brown is requesting that Maplewood approve a conditional use
permit (CUP) to have a 1,515 square foot - accessory building (garage and carport) on his
property.
WHEREAS, this conditional use permit applies to the property at 2776 Keller Parkway.
The property identification number is 04- 29 -22 -32 -0024 and the legal description is:
BEGINING AT POINT ON NORTHERLYEXT OF EASTERLY LINE OF LOT BLOCK 2,
LAKE GERVAIS VIEW ADDITION, 39 FEET NORTHERLY OF NE CORNER SAID LOT, THEN
SOUTHERLY TO SAID NE CORNER, THEN SOUTH 65.DEGREES, 44 MIN, EAST 10OFT,
THEN SOUTH 24 DEGREES, 16MIN, WEST TO SHORE. OF LAKE, THEN SELY ON SAID
SHORE TO L INE RUN PAR TO & 101.14FT MORE. OR LESS SELY OF 1 LINE, THEN
NORTH 24 DEGREES, 44MIN, EAST ON SAID LINE TO POINT 241.36 FT NORTH OF NORTH
LINE OF PKWY., THEN SOUTH. 65 DEGREES, 44 MIN, EAST 119.22 FT. TO E LINE OF WEST
OF GL 1, THEN. NORTH ON SAID EAST LINE TO lNT LINE RUNNING S 61 DEGREES, 24
MINUTES 33 SEC, EAST FROM BEGINING (SUBJECT TO LOAD) IN GOVT LOT 1, IN
SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On January 6, 2003, the planning commission recommended that the city council
approve this permit.
2. On January 27, 2003 the city council held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property
owners. The city council opened the public hearing and allowed everyone at the .
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The city council also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that. the city council approved the above -
described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans.. The city approves this
permit because:
1. - The -use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. , The use would not depreciate property values.
4. 'The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,.*
moke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
10
6.. The use would be served by adequate public- facilities and services, including streets, .
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and.
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. , The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
.9. _ The use would cause minimal adverse environmental. effects.
10. The garage and carport are near the rear of the property (near county open space)
and only visible to one neighbor.
11. The garage and carport have not negatively impacted the surrounding properties..
12. All of the neighbors that responded to our survey were for this proposal.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site. plan approved by the city.. The director of
community development may approve. minor changes.
2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits-from the city.
I. The owner shall not use the garage and carport for commercial or business activities,
unless the city council approves such a request.
4. The city council shall review this conditional use permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on . ., 2003.
11
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2003
a. Conditional Use Permit (Over -sized Accessory Building) — 2776 Keller Parkway
Mr. Roberts said Mr. Ron Brown is requesting - that the city council approve a conditional use
permit (CUP) to-have an accessory structure that exceeds the size limits set by the city code. On
a lot the size. of Mr. Brown's property, the code allows a - maximum of. 2,25.0 square feet for the
combined area of the accessory structures and no accessory - structure may exceed 1,250 square
feet. The garage and carport exceed the maximum size limit by 266 square feet in area. Mr.
Roberts said the code allows the city council to approve a CUP to increase-the area or height of
an accessory building.
Mr. Roberts said Mr. Brown*- built. the carport on the garage without receiving a permit from the'
city. It was after the. city received a* complaint and Mr. Brown applied for a building permit that
staff .discovered that the garage and-carport exceeded the .city code size standards for an
accessory structure. Mr. Roberts said Mr. Brown has applied to the city for all necessary zoning
g
and building permits.
Mr. Roberts said the garage and carport are complete. If the city council approves_ the CUP, city
staff may issue. Mr. Brown his building permit fo_r these structures. Mr. Roberts said if.the city.
council denies the CUP request, then M - r. Brown must remove the carport to make the accessory
structure meet the city size requirements. Mr. Roberts said staff recommends approval of the
CUP for 2776 Keller Parkway for Mr. Ron Brown with the.conditions on page 2 of the staff report.
Commissioner Rossbach asked staff if there were recent alterations that were made to increase
the size of the garage?
Mr. Roberts said- a neighbor claimed that there were alterations made but. staff had not verified
that. The building inspection, department did not have. any record of any permits pulled to have
alterations made to increase the size of the garage.
The. applicant, Mr. Ron Brown at 2776 Keller Parkway, 'addressed the planning commission..
Commissioner Rossbach asked, Mr. Brown if he had recently increased the size - of his garage..
Mr. Brown said he had increased the size of the garage about ten years ago. He said actually he
enlarged- the garage twice without a permit. He said he increased the size of the garage to the
maximum size allowed.
Commissioner Rossbach asked Mr. Brown if he knew he had increased the size of the garage to
the maximum size allowed?
Mr. Brown said yes, he did know that, he did not want to go over the maximum size .because then
someone might make him tear it down. Mr. Brown said the carport he built is basically a tin roof
with a dirt floor with three open sides. He said he dial not. think he needed a permit to build it, in
his opinion it is just a canopy.
Mr. Roberts said he believes Mr. Brown did not think a carport would include the total garage area
of- 1250 square feet. .Mr. Roberts said Mr. Brown was measuring the "enclosed" area not the
is area.
Commissioner Trippler asked if the roof was not attached to the garage and there was a six -inch
space between the two buildings, would it be a different structure then?
Commissioner Rossbach said he called the building inspection department and asked what 'the
city's definition of a shed or accessory. building is because Mr. Brown has a lean -to -roof. with no
walls. - He said:the building inspection department said you could - build accessory building up -to-
1.20 square feet without a .permit. It is the roof coverage of 120 square feet. not necessarily the
"walls" of the area. - Mr. Rossbach said the building inspectors don't enforce that they have
always measured the walls. If the roof had an overhang they would include that as being more
than the ..120 square feet.. Because the enclosure that Mr. Brown built has a lean - roof it is
covered under the carport section of the accessory building ordinance. 'He said it is a cumulative,
total of the square footage of all the'accessory buildings on the property.
Commissioner Dierich asked staff if the carport.has been inspected yet?
Mr.. Roberts said the city can't do an inspection until a building permit is issued and a building
permit cannot be issued 'until the zoning issues are resolved.
Commissioner Pearson asked staff if the materials that Mr. Brown used to build this carport would
be up to code today or not?
Mr:� Roberts said the biggest concern is the snow_ load but that would be a.question the building
inspectors would have to answer.
' Commissioner Ledvina moved. to approve the resolution. on pages 10 and 11 of the staff report.
This resolution approves a conditional .use permit for an accessory structure (garage and carport)
that 1,515 square feet in area for the property at 2776 Keller Parkway. The city is approving
this permit based on the findings listed in the resolutions, this approval is based on the unique
situation and the existing structures for this particular site and it shall be subject to the
following conditions: (changes or additions are in bold and underlined)
1. All, construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community
development may approve. changes.
2. The applicant shall obtain all . necessary building permits from the city.
3. The owner shall not use the garage and carport for commercial or business activities, unless
the city council. approves such a request.
4. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the city council -i'n one year.
Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes - Desai, Dierich., Fischer, Ledvina,
Monahan - Junek, .Mueller, Pearson,
Rossbach, Trippler. .
The motion passed.
This item goes to the city council on Monday, January 27, 2003.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT by
w
TO: City Manager
Daty
r
FROM:- Assistant City Engineer �
Rejected ' �
SUBJECT: Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, Project 02 -10 ReJ n
a. Public Hearing. 7:10 pm '
b. Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearin (4 votes)
)
DATE: January 21, 2003
Introduction
The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for 7:10 p.m., Monday, January .27,
2003. Notices of the public hearing have been mailed and published. The feasibility Y easibilit stud has
been provided as a supplement to the council packet. The study includes information on the
proposed improvement, proposed financing and probable assessments. The city council should
consider ordering the improvement following the public hearing.
Background
Two neighborhood meetings were held for this street improvement project during the fall of 2002
and winter of 2003. The residents of Flandrau Street (north of- Frost Avenue) have petitioned
that the street be constructed as a cul -de -sac and access to White Bear Avenue be eliminated.
The city council ordered the preparation of this feasibility study at the. June 10, 2002, city council
meeting.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution ordering he
i g
improvement of the ; Kennard /Frost Area Street Improvements, City Project 02 -10.
Budget Impact
The resolution calls for establishing a project budget of $2,944,500. The financing Ian is
.. .. 'study g p
outlined specifically in the feasibility study and calls for funding from a number of sources:
assessments, Sewer Utility fund, St. Paul Regional Water Services participation, WAC fund and
city general tax levy.
CIVIC
jW
Attachments: Site Plan.
Resolution
n
Lj
/Z
'E
AVE. N e BURKE AVE. ,
Community
AVE. Cente John� lenn 64 65 r
o CA TEW14 y crt rfan
W HARRIS AVE.
Q ROSEWOOD AVE. N
= ROSEWO D
RAMSEY
Rl ' AN AV. Q �� � AVE. S. J NURSING
FAIR G
cn
ALDRICH I � 150
elf F 28 w
AVE. N D
Q � S MM w ARENA Z
a W � a e k eld Q > � � 150
co Har
0
G �
,Wakefield Y � a a
1 � \
La ke z o m, �
2 9
CO
L °
N 0 A'E
Kel.-nncly-d/Ft-ost 'Arec Streets, 02-10
r I
'i M-cplewood, M
n n e D0-
1
'00' Con
STr UCI i z
y � Y
Y � y
r
RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, a res. ' of the city council adopted the 13th. day of January,
2003, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the
Kennard /Frost Area Street, City Project 02 -10
AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks ublished notice of
p the
hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on January 27, 2003, and the council
has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter. and has fully considered the
same;
NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, M'I NNESOTA, as follows:
1. That it is necessary, cost - effective and feasible as detailed in the
ry ,
feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to the Kennard /Frost
Area Streets, City Project 02 -10.
2. Such improvement is hereby rdered as proposed in the council resolution
n p p o
adopted the 27th day of January 2003.
- 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is
hereby directed to prepare final. plans and specifications for the making of said
improvement.
4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make. the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of
$2,944,500 shall be established. The proposed financing plans is as follows:
Assessments
Sanitary Sewer Fund
SPRWS Obligation
WAC Fund
City General Tax Levy
Tota
$1,137,400
$ 147,000
$ 74,000
$ 100,000
$ 1,486,100
$2,944,500
Agenda #
Act ion, by
Counc
' f �
• J
Applicant: Robert -- Markham Pond Medical Office Bldg.
Site Address: 1570 Beam Avenue
Zoning Business Commercial. Modified
Land Use: Business Commercial Modified
City Council Hearing Date: January 27, 2003
60-Day Deadline: February. 3, 2003.
Project Description Robert Tillges is proposing to construct a 20 -foot -high by
14-foot-wide freestanding sign along Beam Avenue for his new medical office building
(Markham Pond Medical Office Building) . that is currently being constructed at 1570
Beam Avenue. The sign will be constructed within an existing sign easement located on
the Maplewood Cancer Center's property (1580 Beam Avenue). The sign easement
was required after the subdivision of Mr. Tillges' lot from the Maplewood Cancer
Center's lot is 1997.
Request The city's sign code requires all freestanding signs to maintain a 10 -foot
setback from the right -of -way. Mr. Tillges is requesting that the city council approve a
10 - foot sign setback variance. in order to construct the sign right up to the Beam Avenue
right -of -way, with no setback.
Recommendations Staff recommends denial of Mr. Tillges' request for a 10 -foot
sign setback variance. On January 14, 2003, the Community Design Review Board
unanimously recommended denial of the 10 -foot sign setback variance.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
SUBJECT* Markham Pond Medical Office Building -- Sign Setback
variance
APPLICANT: Robert Tillges
LOCATION: 1570 Beam Avenue
DATE: January 15, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Robert Tillges is developing a 23,094 - square -foot office building called Markham Pond
Medical Office Building at 1570 Beam Avenue.- The.office building will house Mr. Tillges'
existing prosthetics and orthotics practice (currently located at 1983 Sloan Place,
Maplewood) as well as other medical -type tenants. Two freestanding signs are
proposed for the office building, one along Hazelwood Street and the other along Beam
Avenue. Both signs. are proposed_ at 14 -feet, 8- inches wide by 20 -feet, 2- inches tall.
The Hazelwood Street sign will maintain a setback of 10 feet to the right --of -way, and the
Beam Avenue sign will be constructed up to- the right -of -way line, .with no. setback.
(Refer to maps and elevations on pages .9 through 14.).'
Request
Mr. Tillges is requesting that the city council approve a 10 -foot sign setback variance in
order to .construct the Beam Avenue freestanding sign up to the right -of -way.
BACKGROUND
On October 31, 1997, the city administratively approved a lot. split to subdivide a 6.091.
acre parcel into two lots. The subdivision created the Maplewood Cancer Center lot
("2.53 acres), 1580 Beam Avenue East, and Mr. Tillges' lot (3.57 acres), 1570 Beam
Avenue East.
June 10, 2002, the city council approved the following items for the Markham Pond
Office Building: 1) vacation. of an unused sewer easement; 2) comprehensive sign . plan;
3) design review (referto 6/10/02 city council minutes attached on pages 15 through 18).
DISCUSSION
Sign Easement
During the subdivision of Mr. Tillges' property from the Maplewood Cancer Center's
property in 1997, the city required a 15- foot -wide by 15. 0foot -deep sign easement along
Beam Avenue on the Maplewood Cancer Center's property (refer to sign easement map
attached on page 19). This easement was required in order to allow .Mr. Tillges' property
to have a freestanding sign on Beam Avenue. The sign easement was created prior to
the city's requirement that freestanding signs maintain a 10 -foot setback from .the right-
Markham Pond Medical Building 1 January 15, 2003
of -way. In addition to.the sign easement and proposed freestandin g sign non Beam
Avenue, Mr. Tillges property has street frontage on Hazelwood Street, where he also
proposes a freestanding sign.
The city's sign ordinance also requires a 10 -foot setback from the side ro ert line for
p p Y
all freestanding signs. It appears.that there is ample. room within the existing easement
to maintain this required setback. It does appear, however, that an existing deciduous
tree located within the easement will need to be removed. If the tree were removed, Mr.
Tillges would be responsible for replacing it somewhere on the Maplewood Cancer
Center's property.
Comprehensive sign Plan :
The city's sign ordinance requires all multi - tenant buildings. with five or more tenants to
have an approved comprehensive sign plan. Mr. Tillges' Phase] building will have up to
eight tenants, with additional tenants proposed in the Phase II building. The community
design review board (CDRB) approved a comprehensive sign plan forlhe. Markham
Pond Medical Office Building -
on May 28, 2002, with follow -up city council review on
June 10, 2002.
Mr. Tillges had originally proposed two freestanding signs that were 20.5 feet in height
by 20 feet in width. Even though the sign was within the city's allowable square footage
for a freestanding sign in this zoning district (Business Commercial Modified), the CDRB
expressed concern over the size proposed., particularly the Hazelwood. Street sign,
which would be near a residential neighborhood. After much debate, the CDRB required
Mr. Tillges to reduce the width of both signs from 20 feet to 17 feet. The city council.
upheld the width reduction and. also required Mr. Tillges to obtain a - revised sign
easement from the Maplewood Cancer Center in order to accommodate a 10 -foot
setback. from the Beam Avenue right -of -way..
Instead of obtaining the revised sign easement from the Maplewood Cancer Center
Mr. Tillges reduced the width of both freestanding signs from the originally proposed 20
feet,. and the city's required 17 feet, to 14 feet, 8 inches. Mr. Tillges then applied for a
sign permit application indicating that the 14 -foot, 8 -inch -wide sign would be installed
within the existing 15 -foot -wide by 15 -foot -deep sign easement, right up to the Beam
Avenue right -of -way. Mr. Tillges was informed of the comprehensive sign -plan condition
that required him to obtain a revised sign easement to allover for a 10 -foot setback. If the
revised easement were not obtained, a 10 -foot sign setback variance would need to be
approved.
On inspection of the site, it also appears that Mr. Tillges has already ad the. metal ca ' s
Y p
for the 14 -foot, 8 -inch -wide signs premanufactured..These metal caps are currently
stored on the site and can be seen in the attached picture on page 20.
Sign Comparisons
Following is a' comparison of Mr. Tillges' proposed sign with existing freestanding signs
near the Markham Pond Medical Office Building:
Markham Pond Medical Building. 2 January 15, 2003
Sign
Development Name Location Height Width Size Setback
Birch Run Station
1741 Beam
33 ft
20. ft
660 s.f.
Oft
First Evangelical Free Church
.2696 Hazelwood
5 ft
8 ft .
24 s.f.
Oft
Hazel Ridge
2730 Hazelwood
7 ft'.
6 ft
24 s.f.
5.ft
Maplewood Cancer Center
1580 Beam
6 ft
8 ft
48 s.f. -
0 ft
Maplewood Office Park
1650 Beam
12 ft
5 ft
60 s.f.
loft .
Maplewood Professional Bldg. -
1560 Beam
8 ft, 6 in
8 ft, 3 in
70 s.f,
0 ft
Markham Pond Medical Bldg.
1570 Beam
20 ft, 2 in
14 ft, 8 in
96 s.f.
n/a
Ramsey County Library
1670 Beam
6 ft, 4 in
4 ft
24 s.f.
0 ft
St. John's Hospital (west sign)
1575 Beam
14 ft ' ..
6 ft, 1 in
70 s.f.
10 ft
St. John's Hospital (east sign)
24 ft
7 ft
168 s.f.
- loft
All of the above - mentioned comparable signs were constructed prior to 1997 when the
city's sign ordinance was revised to require a 10 -foot setback from a right -of -way for
freestanding signs. Therefore, a majority of the signs were constructed right up to the
right -of -way. The office and residential. signs range from. 5 feet to 12 feet in height and
` from 4 feet to 8 feet in width. The retail (Birch Run) and hospital signs range from 14
feet to 33 feet in height and 6 feet to 20 feet in width. (Refer to sign pictures on pages
21' through 24.)
A medical office building is considered a destination location.,, unlike the surrounding
retail stores that are often frequented by impulse. Staff finds that Mr. Tillges' proposed
sign at 20 feet, .2 inches in height and"! 4 feet, 8 inches in width is sized similar to the
surrounding retail and hospital uses rather than the office uses for which it is intended. -
The Maplewood Cancer Centerr's representative, 'AI Hirschler, shares this opinion. Mr.
Hirschler expresses his concern over the large sign (which. will be located in close
proximity to their clinic) in his attached memorandum on page 25.
Traffic Visibility
The sign easement is Located. on the west side of a shared driveway for the Maplewood
.Cancer Center and Markham Pond Medical Office Building. Drivers exiting this driveway
can only turn right, going eastbound onto Beam Avenue. Staff is concerned that
Mr. Tillges' sign as proposed will block the vision of oncoming eastbound traffic for
drivers exiting this driveway.
Lt. Rabbett of the city's police department has also expressed concern over the visibility
issue as described in his attached memorandum . on page 26. ln' addition, Chris Cavett
Assistant City Engineer, and Dan Solar, Ramsey County Engineer, state that the s ight
lines for the proposed sign location should be verified to insure that visibility for vehicles
turning out of the driveway onto Beam Avenue is not blocked.
Fight -of -Way Issues
Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer, and Dan Solar, Ramsey County Engineer, state
that if the variance is. granted and Mr. Tillges is allowed to construct a sign with no
setback, that a condition be placed on the property owner that any relocation of the sign
Markham Pond Medical Building 3 January 15, 2003
iti..tne future as a result of adgitional right -of -way needs on .Beam Avenue will be at'the
owner's expense. In addition, Chuck Ahl, City Engineer, points out that there is a
minimum 2 -foot clearance required from all sidewalks. The sign as proposed will be,
constructed within a few inches of the sidewalk.
Hardship
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance
from the zoning code: 1) strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property under consideration;. and 2) the variance would be
in. keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship ", as used in
granting of a variance, means the property in question .cannot be put to a reasonable
use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner
is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the
variance,. if granted, will not alter the essential character of the -locality, Economic
considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the.
property exists under the terms of the ordinance - .
Mr. Tillges outlines his estimate of hardship. in the attached memorandum. on pages 27
through 28. In summary, he asserts that a sign with a 10-foot setback will diminish his
patients' ability to locate his site.
There are. two mature evergreen trees located along Beam Avenue in front of the
Maplewood. Professional Building. These evergreen trees could block the eastbound
traffic's visibility of Mr. Tillges' sign, . if constructed with a 10 -foot setback. In addition, the
sign easement was created prior to the city's requirement for a 10 -foot freestanding sign
setback. These items are "unique to the property and not by. the landowner."
However, the setback variance will "alter the essential character of the locality J3 because
of the size of the sign in relation to the surrounding compatible office use signs. Also, "a
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance" because a 5-
foot -wide sign could be constructed within the existing sign easement with the required
10 -foot setback, the sign easement . could be revised to allow the construction of the
proposed sign with a 10 -foot setback, and there is ample space along Hazelwood Street
fora freestanding sign.
SUMMARY
Staff would be supportive of Mr. Tillges' sign setback variance if a smaller sign were
proposed. As it stands, however, a large sign constructed in this location will block
traffic visibility and will not be compatible with the surrounding existing office signs.
COMMITTEE ACTION
On January 14, 2003, the Community Design Review Board unanimously recommended
denial of Mr. Tillges request for a 10 -foot sign setback variance (see attached 1/1.4/03 -
minutes).
Markham Pond .Medical Building 4 January 15,-2003
RECOMMENDATION
Deny Robert Tillges' request for a 10 -foot sign setback variance in order to construct e*
14 -foot, 8- inch -wide by 20 -foot, 2- inch -tell freestanding sign up to the 'Beam Avenue.
right -of -way. for his development at 1570 Beam Avenue. The city is denying this request
because:
1. The construction of such a large sign will block traffic visibility for drivers turning
out of the driveway onto Beam Avenue.
2. A large office sign constructed. in this location will not be compatible with the
surrounding office signs.
3. There are no unique hardships or circumstances that warrant approving the
proposed 10 400t sign setback variance,
Markham Pond Medical Building
5.
January 15, 2003
CITIZEN COMMENTS
I surveyed all owners within:350.feet of this site. Of the 14 surveyed, five property =
.owners responded as follows:
Supoort
1. Daniel Sitter, managing partner at Maplewood Professional Associates at 1560
Beam Avenue: "The Maplewood Professional Associates support the variance
as requested by Mr.. Tillges.n
2. Daniel Gatto,. managing partner at Maplewood Professional Associates at 1560
Beam Avenue. Mr. Gatto's letter of support is attached on page 29.
3. Kyle Davis, system director of real estate at St. John's* Hospital at 1575 Beam
Avenue. Mr.. Davis' letter of support is attached on. page 30.
O bject
1. - Arthur Nielsen, 2781 Hazelwood Street: "Is there any way a smaller sign. can be
placed on Hazelwood Street? Build more like the existing. Commercial signs on
Hazelwood Street."
2. Thomas Schuette, Azure Properties, management. firm for the Maplewood Office
Park* at 1650 Beam Avenue. Mr. Schuette's letter of objection is attached on -
.page 31.
3. Al Hirschler, representative for the Maplewood Cancer Center at 1580 Beam
Avenue. Mr.. Hirschler's letter of objection was referred to earlier in the staff
report and is attached on.page 25.
Markham Pond Medical Building 6. January 15, 2003
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size: 3.57 acres
Existing Land Use:.. Office Building
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Maplewood Cancer Center and Maplewood Professional Building
(Zoned. Business Commercial — Modified (BC-M))
South: City of Maplewood property (Zoned Farm and Planned Park)
East: Maplewood Office Park (Zoned Business Commercial Modified)
(BC -M))
West: City of Maplewood property across Hazelwood Street (Zoned"
Single- Dwelling Residential and Planned Open Space)
PLANNING
Existing Land
Use Plan: Business Commercial — Modified (BC -M)
Existing Zoning: Business Commercial - Modified (BC -M)
CRITERIA FOR. APPROVAL
Section 36- 272(a). of the city's sign ordinance requires a 1 0-foot setback from a right -of-
way for all freestanding signs.
State law requires that the city council make the following findings to approve a variance
.from the zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to
the property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in granting of a variance, means the property in question
cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under .conditions allowed by the official
controls. The. plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not
created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will _not alter the essential
character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue
hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
Markham Pond Medical Building. 7 January 15, 2003
. - App�i+cat�on Date
The city received a complete variance. application for this request on December 4, 2002.
State law requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving a complete
application for a land use proposal. As such, city action is .required on this request by
February. 3, 2003.
P :1sec31tiilges sign variance
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2.. 'Zoning Map
3. Land Use Map
.4. Site Plan
5. Elevations
6. Sign Elevation
7. June 1 2002 City Council Minutes -
8. Sign Easement
9. Pictures of Sign Caps
10. Pictures of Surrounding Signs
11. Maplewood Cancer Center's Memo Dated January 6, 2003
12. Lt. -Kevin Rabbett's Memo Dated December 31, 2002 .
13.. Robert Tillges' Memo Dated December 4, 2002
14. Maplewood Professional Associate's Memo - Dated November 25, 2002
15. St. John's Hospital Letter Dated January 14, 2003
16. Azure Properties' Letter Dated December 27, 2002 .
January 15, 2003
Attachment 1
.AT
e
i�
r
rr
L
� ugni manurauiunng din -i I.
Business Commercial Modified (B
!� Business Commercial (BC)
Sinele Dwelling Residential (R -11
�:rrim901iiriv=irr
r��
F AL Aft
w 5U T � Urz
a
a
- s
IW_i01
ei i morzi own re more
ugnt manuraciuring tm --i )
;:_ Business Commercial Modified (B
������ Business Commercial (13C)
Single Dwelling Residential (R -1)
Park (P)
, Qnen Snace (0 S1
Ah
:lt
Attachment 4
O mi3O00000
a
nr9✓
ac,
Ex. T5' 51011
r
EASEMENT
-..
COMP
. NOrK1MENT 5 —,.�.
1 - (4EE. MCMRECTURAI.)
p le w-00
.�.�� i
DO
A ct?
�r
Ca 1
i I V.. ;.
lb
N no -M
,Smznf
E Site Plan
cl
12
I 1 -STORY BUILDING 2
78 sF.
I•. FFE■ 88200
-/
AREA T o ri
C ITY OF
1
MAPLEWOOD FOR
ADWnOffN R.O.M.
REQUIRED FOR
RECONSTRU ITION
Of. HAZELWOOD
,
it 1�
AVENUE
'O
�-. // ,
i. _ //
IRSTAIL
CONCRETE APRON
1
� o
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
r r �� ......
d.
r
PER CRT of
MAPLEWOOD
sUNDARDS (SEE
DETAIL 7 /c7)�•
I �l
41r i
I - — T GUTTER ,� • / `o ' /
019 / 1
II Ew CURO TO STARQ4R0 PARKING SPACE 17 CURB &
XIS(I (
MATCH ENO 9.5' WIDE x Ir- DEEP CUTTER MP.)
I
I _
II (T (SEE DETA i
UNLESS NOTED IL B /C$)
� r .-�- •-rte
�l
I �r.
3r -a• -2• 12' -11"
tT• -to"
,- .-
'�
'
• 1 ._.._9��1_�.I
_
�
_ 190 .
TIP 4LIM ��
BROW
FLOWS T CURB n
77 r
i
I � o
i 10' SKN1
w
PHASE I
I
DROPPED CURB
DROPPED CURB HANOICAPPED PARKING
• STALLS
RE S
AREA OF EXCES
'• - MNSTIQUCTIO Tr
- -- '""' -
°. -"
PLANTING BED & STRIPING
9 -6• WIDE X 10' -D I
j
Cm PROPERTY BE
J I II
I 1 __
.
r �°`�'` �'°"�"` 1 -STORY BUILDING 1 °`� '
PURCHASED er
RTY .0"A
PROPE
I I I ( I I 17
I I I
°i--
--
TI P , CUTTER OUT I
MONUMENT SIC
(SEE ARCHITECT URAL)
.�
i:. PHASE I To ,• 9s• ----_
;:.. NSl'RUCT ON
� BffU us _
�
TRANSITION CURB KIOW 1
FFE• 860.80
912 CURE GUTTER 5£CMENUI t?M.00K ca
AQJACENT lO BU0.DN10 RETAINING WALL I
i
1
INSTALL CONCRETE
!! 270' -a'
(SEE DE7A1L 9105) BASE POMNT I
1
APR PER CR
ST ANDARDS SEE
(
i I I
1 �— I - I I I _lII
II --" ( � 11 --I
um LINE
DETAIL 7/C7)
-
- �:. •.,'' ETE .PAD -- t ----`—
Q�
- H I lGh
i ..., y • '.:,
CONCR[TE .PAD ;p
DEC
����-- �...••ggggggCLOAR FENC ORATNE 162'
loo
�QV
33 S' - ts' 24' 3a' 24' 30' 104' -8•
40'
33'-
154' 12r
lb
N no -M
,Smznf
E Site Plan
cl
12
• � TR9OB1��
r Ior"&
r .MATERIAL INDEX
K A. PREFI ISHIED METAL FLAS"
k a STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
C. METAL (PAINTED)
a HOLLOW METAL (PAINTED)
E. 1 CLFJIR INSUI. GLASS
F. PREFINIVED ( FRANCS FACE
N. FACE BRICK (T(PE 'U)
K N L EFIS (COLOR #t)
4. EFTS (COLOR /Y)
K. ERS ( COLOR Y�)
L PREFIIISHIED AL MIJTIN BARS
M. PRECAST CONC. SILL UNIT
N. PMUSHED METAL O.MA. (PAINTED)
WEST 0.. PR LASHED ALUM. SLAT. METAL (PAINTED)
P. • 3400 F.G. REINFORCED ASPHALT SHINGLES
ELEVATION - a CONTINUOUS RIDGE VENT
i •� R. KEYSTONE RETAIING WP" BLgCK
t
f _
I
Y
MmMmm
NORTH
EL
EAST
ELEVATION
i
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIi.
7:00 P.M., Monday, June 10, 2002
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 02 -12
4. 10:25 (7:45 P.M.) Tillges Office Building (South of 1580 Beam
A. Sewer Easement Vacation
B.. - Design Approval
C. Comprehensive Sign Plan Approval
a. City Manager Fursman. presented the staff report.
b.' Assistant Community. Development Director Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report.
C. Tom Ekstrand presented , the , Design Review Board Report
d.' Commissioner Fisher presented the Planning Commission Report.
e. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Robert Tillges, Jerry Anderson and Al Kreitman, Applicants
p
Will Rossbach, 1386 Coun ty Road C, Ma lewood
. Cliff Aichinger, Watershed District
Bob Zick, 1880E. Shore Drive
d. Mayor Cardinal closed. the public hearing.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the following resolution for the vacation of an unused
sewer easement on the south side of the.-prop ert;�
RESOLUTION 02 -06 -107
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Robert Tillges applied for the vacation of the following:
A portion of a 10 -foot wide unused sewer easement (Ramsey County, MN, Document No. 15 842 5 3 )
located along the south property line of the property located south of Beam Avenue. and east of Hazelwood
Street, Maplewood (Property Identification Number: 03-29-22-42-0009). and described as follows:
Legal Description: South 10 feet of East 5413 5 feet of Northwest Quarter of Northwest .Quarter of
Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22
WHEREAS the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On May 20, 2002, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve the
public - vacation.
2 0 On June 10, 2002, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the. abutting property owners. The council gave
City Council Meeting 06 -10 =02
15
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also
considered reports, an d recommendations from the city staff and planning commission.
WI-E1ZEAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to Robert
Tillges for the above - mentioned property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the_ above - described vacation .
for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The sewer easement is unused.
3. The sewer easement is not needed for the proposed Tillges Medicat Office Building
development.
Seconded by. Councilmember Collins Ayes -Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers
Collins, Juenemann and Kooppen .
Nays- Councilmember Wasiluk
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve Robert Tillges' comprehensive sign plan for the Tillges
Medical Office Building with the following conditions
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a sign permit or parking lot permit
for this project.-
ect.
b. Prior to issuance of a sign permit, the applicant will submit or complete the following:
1) A revised sign easement for the proposed. freestanding .sign on the Maplewood Cancer
Center property at 15 80 Beam Avenue. The revised easement must encompass the
proposed placement of the sign with a 10 -foot setback from the Beam Avenue right-
of -way.
2) A revised landscape plan showing landscaping around the base of both freestanding
signs to include low- maintenance perennial shrubs and flowering plants.
3) A revised freestanding sign plan showing the footing detail and verification of an 80-
mile- per -hour wind load capacity to be approved by the building official.
4) A revised lighting plan showing the proposed lighting source for the two and
photometrics for the two freestanding signs.
c. The tenant wall signs for the Phase I building (Tillges Medical Office Building) are
limited to the north and west elevations only.
d. The tenant wall signs are limited to 2 feet in height by 8 feet in width and must - be placed
within the dormer above the. tenant's window space.
e. The tenant wall signs for the Phase II building are not approved with this proposal.
f. Two freestanding signs are approved (overall size is 20.5 feet in height, 17 feet in width).
One freestanding sign is to be located with a 10 -foot setback to the Hazelwood Avenue sight-
of -way. The second freestanding sign is to be located -within a sign easement located. on the
Maplewood Cancer Center property at 1580 Beam Avenue East, with a 10 -foot setback to the
Beam Avenue right -of -way.
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
g. A timer shall be installed on the Hazelwood Street freestanding sign that turns the sign lights
off at 10 p.m. l
h. All work shall follow .the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Collins Ayes -All
Councilmember Koppen moved to a rove the plans date stam ed. Jgp
qM 25 Februpa 12 Febru
1815 *1 1.1 and May 8, 2002 for the Phase I portion of the Tillges Medical Office Buildmg
development The city is approving these plans based on the findings required by the code. The
-applicant shall do the followin
a. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
..b. The Phase II portion of the Tillges Medical Office Building development is not approved
with this approval.
C. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall submit or complete the
following:
1) A signed developer's agreement and' surety to the city which covers the
following: assurance of construction of the sanitary. sewer, storm sewer, and water
main; temporary grading easement for grading conducted -on city property; acquisition
of city property; and engineering review charges.
2) A survey completed by a registered land surveyor showing the following: existing
conditions, all easements located on the property (identify the extent and interest for each
- easement), and location. of the Phase I building and parking .lot. A .registered land. -
surveyor must also stake the location of the building on the property.
3) A revised grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans which meet. conditions
and requirements of the assistant city engineer outlined in his memorandum dated
April. l l 2002.
4) A revised landscape plan that shows 12 replacement trees to be installed on city
property within the area of the approved temporary grading easement. The revised
plan should also identify the planting species, sizes and quantities. City code requires
deciduous trees to be at least 2 %Z inches in caliper, balled and burlapped. Coniferous
trees must be at least six feet tall.
5) A revised lighting plan that shows all pole lights to be a maximum of 25 feet in height,
measured from ground grade to the top of the luminaries, and the maximum light
intensity at all property lines not to exceed .4 -foot candles.
6) A temporary grading easement for all proposed grading on the Maplewood
Professional Building property at 1560 Beam Avenue East.
7) An agreement that authorizes the construction of a portion of the parking lot within the
storm water drainage easement located along the north properly dine of the southern
City Council Meeting 06 -10 -02
17
leg of the property (Easement Document Number 3031096). The agreement must be
signed by the Maplewood Cancer Center property owner at 1580 Beam Avenue East
and all other parties with interest to the easement:
8) The vacation and relocation of portions, of the County Ditch No. 18 easement to match
the proposed culvert extension (Ditch Easement Document No. 2207724). The new
easement must be recorded with Ramsey County and shall be subject to the approval
of the city engineer.
9) A revised utility- plan showing the location. of a fire hydrant to be approved by the
city's fire marshal.
10) Place Aemporary orange safety fencing at the grading limits, including around all trees
to be preserved (construction fence to the drip line of the trees).
d. The applicant shall complete the following. before occupying the building:
l) Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all landscaped areas:
2) Install all required Phase I landscaping on the site and install 12 replacement tees on
the city property located to the south of the site.
3) Sod or hydro seed the Phase II portion of the development within 14 days of
completion of the Phase II grading.
4) Install continuous concrete curb around the parking lots and drives, including
installing concrete curb along the two proposed driveway extensions into the Phase II
portion of the development.
5) Pave all driving surfaces.
6) Install a fire hydrant.
e. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if:
1) The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety ar
welfare.
2) The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work..
The amount. shall be 150 percent of the cost of the. unfinished work. Any unfinished
landscaping shall be completed by June l if the building is occupied in the winter or
within six weeks if the building is occupied in the spring and summer.
3) The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished
work.
f. All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk Ayes -All
City Council Meeting 06-10-02
18
g Attachment 8
B EJVUE N ;•
1
--------- - - - - -- WEST ------------------------ - - - - -- -- - - - - --
--------- r-------------------- - - - - -- 395.00 i , I
0
- SI ASEMENT . PER t
- 3031094
\ EX. / -
BUILDING ,
I \ ( 45.00 t
1`• �. `. / - 15:00 -
i rj
M 1 .
30:00 t
l M/ BITUMINOUS. SURFACE
I. 3 c
IsX. I l
, 3.44 J o� BUILDING c
ul
.90 ol
{s I 1
- I�- r t• 878 4
�� - �,J $ 4 �.- n l ;- E"" 976 ;`' _• 1
-- - - --- L -- O - - - - - -- ---------►-------•--
IN - " 'Mo t 6 • p _ 87T. -��v� ` :ter \�• ` . `�i,� . ` 7 +
876 \ 1 I S.• 1
78 - EN T p i
4- - 00 N0. 22 880
i ��24 ���"' - \ \4 `�Y i� r I 1
s '1 18 CMP
I J �L �� \ INV- 870.02 / o /
00 `` \ 1 \ / / / P9 17 �\
C4
0
��' TREE .LINE \ �P �\ ` a 1
L / RETAI C
\ \ • WALL \ "' P9 1
12. I \
BITUMINOUS; SURFACE
888
22.
- _ \
110 50 2.11 "W \ / 1
c8 1
RIM -889. 6 I ,- ,► I
_ I BITUMINOUS SURFACE INV =$83.
15* CMP
INV- 870.33 1 1
RIM- 876.84 -- 45.001 ,
INV- 870.69 1 .
. .1 ... / � it �, ,
s , , f �i 1
'
- �- b , 1 WALL
r �/ ; - / / ' /�` ,� --' ! ` c 30.00
\ / r - / /� / l RIM- 886.95 >t >f>f
;R / �.... _� i INV- S89° 12 11 E
- To SEW
i
MARK mm
19
.
".�. ., L , ,:, it� _-�. �� - ,'..'. t ,�� '� a"• r� �'a �, ,� �i, i�z � � . Kt " ��t �� ��. �� �/{ �, w r . irF ,
''• ;• 4 t'c °,: y � ,l,�y.,, a/h �r.' ► fir. , f �f �'.
it' •, � +, �if ' J � ; 3r�r. � I 1�,,, e��. �5 f�' ! q (� =
' � � - i �, .S a •, `. _� •F � ,�• :mo :i��', It♦ �, L i f � ' ,AP7ti.., a ���' ` : , f 1 / t � 3 � d � � 7+ Yr' t
! a i r l.,i,'j +.l app /. /e if •' 41 l{1 ¢/{
f,
I fi t t ( r i. 3'S f � �. ♦ !;
.- F� �',^ . r . 3 1n ;. , -'� • � '� r r
!
.. �f is ' J r J ..; FQ. s, 1 �, ,. , F .. •i X°Y ,, )"'•� � . ` 7. a z f t
looft WE,
MW
t �
}�
r , � .: 0-,t �yah.- �.;•N1gn Cq.. _ _ R `!r"y , f... � .
N �
F3
t
r
WE
isi r✓ '` ..;.Y r,c >r r a " r {� t. i.' � , �.;r _f l.• - f �,l kx v _ r i { -- _ :(` 2
. _ , t r .: .,F, 1'�;a.. �„ _ 'W � >+ _i •A )'' ..>! t , J �:. �- i 7 .✓� ,- �' �"� � V', -v� �'."'.�,
�+, .1•. e, ..e•t;'a.G .F.•r• . r
;h . -'•d,' i+. i ,n t' r t. rF�. t •, 'b• ,. ?:•'. '"�c."}17
'l� F.�Y'•< >f_ ?r. • t. � r,_Y< ft; eY''! i ra. .,.. -� C.. tee? l t` •:�a? -f .5.: -r3 ti, is 1; f j J t cs. : fi s r&
- Y.' �•.',b 9.yD'r: -Y:f :AJ. Y I. Yy1 .t aY r.. ) 5 4., I .7.r -�. \ +" y ��r•�
:7 ,b ` I�. A� „4'! �.Y'. -fr -.. .;Jl.l rc�h . y: :..1: > .2 \.{'. �.� ✓L �� y )t')} T, - J¢ * "# ..tii � v.�;.
''„"�,'v�.- ✓.:• `. t'•s-- Fr;'�. .f�- ,7•.,'. ;l j rr'. a, '•�.t'�+i ?' :":..z,. �r a�. }..e E -.>v e �s ^2''r u 7v ,;s � ,� _•moo_' „ .'Y , ...Y.
d'.a.oe:' + .iFi_ c- ,u .'•F.f + }i.!i r&..>!.rr !. Ss"`.Li rt `r Kr„?.r. S .x, .':r.<' St>'k t¢ -1'F }..- 3. :t _ ) S f - '-,r • `�7s : tis'" _., , c 5. ...F `..44... >. �.,., r y .i i ,� .r'
^; M 1 = ' '! Y'h,.'b 1 iF'`yy.. �. _ .n i:c . ' ,` 1f 4_.i.Jd : l • ' 1� J, _ - ,Yep .. _: $, �} •/. .5 1 Yw�•i h L L P • . F ,, •.'�7�i\ �.•Q+,T - yt? ^ l �. t,\ '. �7?=�
-1.r'�� ,�,; , ti`c r- 3.t. !• .}. ✓y.'#. 3„ .Zt'. -9-i 2 ,. t„ a, ,,�,,.: _ " +? r,f.8 .3 s; _ '`�• -:
;•J,o:3' - f• -I!' {�y� ..,,1'} � - o 5,. 't7.XSi .. ; arr.'4.`> �' .:w .
?r'• 'tiw5i...' .,LY ;•e; -i•. c •Kti'�,*,. 7. ..a.y_ ..�1 1, . r. ' »r^,.. ,� - t' ,. ,,• r Y - •l ] f 4 : r " r �L �'J t.: - Y.. ' .r _`''�'' :F,.•-
t'rr �K, `"�F) �b,�??. "Y + r 3. j" - / �:- - r' S'. t r . �. N, sJ•• ,.y `1`�
'b.:Riff "q F •1 ti - i,' •ic t .,a_f�. a. +:.. i .:x t t . ::i •. . t di •,�. ;y,�' v� -
liit4::. C^ a��.;..,i �' A+��''�• 'r. ���.,, ;; :1,,{ ��.-KX ,>. . Y..�•1 . ` - +'� si..r+ �. .*S. ri ��•`� - ��T �.. '�S'' •• �j.: v.�'�.:.
.. 7• >+'.. Svaf,RH
�i15•A;r..,. e .i#r - 1r. ^ - :.j�xC"Cr' I s. '..t �` �L. .r, p. r: k zY .t`. , l•;;r• •'• r.�. < i� '�'•f ::r: '•" r• - .'" y'.., -.. '4�;eo 4., ; r
l i+' ^•;r,.R t .: L . (: . �., 5: t£T{ -a•,. ,a: k 'rs + S' r,. �•,_.r' , ,..f .7 •,c._ :�� ' ..{.,R. ,- .'�. r :. l.u, n �i:.;2;' •. i_a iy _ r y s . _ �''a ,: h,.+ _
t -.'a:.,•. a-,.c; 2 -,u 'L .b �}¢.. '?i..�',i*t3f4'ti j"k„_ !! g xf .3:' a a.' Rr.i'�t'c5k �.� ,.... *;�•`.' - a!�J�s:. ',!_' _ ,'v;_' .'�; 'ui.
F -:, ;,r. �, {. c'� /,1�'�"'� 'r�w. •'-i:+l'f.•l lv}t�';u --.T 'Jr�'� qt r . >�c,�`E i ,.�T. •,r•"�'t �•s•. ,:x*G { f :r? s - ..^3",.f ,•;�` ..t a •f: s �'S•c � �, r �a
r .., p:� �,f .:5 .�' -t� - • ,� ✓� .: ' :. f.1 .,,F, 'dt ,, .�.:u�`3 .F t._ r_ �,.. - 'L•: #. .s r_`` - f, •`�`.. _. - .,
a01 ' _ � �. ,�� ,Y_ l�;_� i �` �'• _ ^}� � .�rr. `�,� � L'3 �e ° :.,,,', t�,'k r.:: "�.h'� r ,,, r•. � ;�::
''`vi� ''v '�S,:t's '�ri'+�i l• fi;: 4'�; sus < y = >.'r . c Y f i°�¥�' . 2 . ;.�f .'t r `• W_•t`: t�•!u ik a f> - .r. ... ''` ;` . t t ,�i t' � z '" '4 oR. G'"ac_.
z �`�r ��`t�t�;?ts , s ` .�'� t.,: ` ,, n. y; ;�, •,�,� s ; �'z<,' , # ;_� aR�, a. , c t :�!•' so � �f , , r -f ;:, y � � '�$iRf , `' :, . =,�, ice•' ...'t�,f?�' .r
"+f �`�'; 't"' �'- ,'Q,d" fi' _`• m `�vr - �''. 8.,5 ':`��'� </T, - s frf }.r - v..r yF•';zct;:' -`�. .�', £��- u.�i =. .Y ...
>� r {. •ti .1'���3�'� YY „, ..'•�1 c: � � - �.`''�2 � . -,t� r cY• d '•q•�.: '' � :r. --.p" �flL'e. X'yi
� 3•!. M L 4 b � � ' � �y i ;
-Y� x k i .1 r >}' �I F - s'�+ i . 1 ". r, �r ra°t ' `�1r F ;,.r;' ri :- ''4�- ..Y ^,t`.',r`�= }j+e...S• y M sj.t"- "'�f""
�'}� �`` ,�.'rr.F'tb : i '' 1 �:y .!�;.,� • � FLda{f�e � � a l��l��s � w T1 1 i _"„'Cra�v.•��T�'0� ���A �d: -;
r ' � 'i �.�' �`' ra. 49 } St3d �lt' --� �� ':fi � a�i1�' tt•� ',�,�`"�. :t a .
S i SaYr # � f � [�• r�'n^, •c'3r � ';.C' "'_ `'r5° fi ,� 17r±_�••pr
+. � • � v. I � t��in�k * -�y ";G' i , - .ta�yj ��' s'•� -r yx+ � ' •� � � a .�Y.
1 `t• .. �'t t 1` �isj ^A p .'t U f. i+JJ f 7 '!' 1 {.r' •- 4��{i�f��' Win, �, • �' 7 � p y�,. ` �+y,
Pr. 4 . � taY� -if � �i�`t.'�. �� ��L + t�,Ed� rail �,r c: � -. p i�,�� �r - � ✓`,.r�.s,��•�'..:�__ '��1� �Y
•ro_,� �'� „�' *����s' +r*f,�'.r tr�� .• �'�i����rf�,.��,$r���,�,a"��' } _ '�1.c.�'$'
'i ��,r� i ' s �f ' l ai r f v' ��'i� � 4� �,'�. � � � a I T � -•i �X � ��y��fj r fj� „ .\
✓ifs t r /ta. u"' 7 �f:i,n 1 f FS ,T~'�' � T ��f
ti
6a c+ &•: ,+,•:c ti f >.. + b D t 'r v"`• '��t { %lt.,`�zsx
' :✓•w"r� n'j r ' '•:s '" ~ 'n �. ij \ L / Q r,` I i !ti
15 ® , -' 1'•lb 3 ,
.. t.
s' q .9... �, F�• � • i i i ir. _ -t fir: - �`h1 / " h p � t r
{ i n'al
'U �iASELIYOOD 'JN BEP',[ 3
� if
iSfi , ✓t.i,, � i ji r' !!, y - >s, \1,z ., � r r f '.:� ,r �' ,r i J y,t..
----r' *ut4'w" r f i i >• ; � - � t �S i o^ � s:' I � I � , t 7 (A
f,� f ✓�r.F. '� iw �ln� ... i4 ,oral • r �. i '.�'
+* sf T �4.
r
r r trT^• F s #E C
af r� 'i; Y )¢ 4^v�P 2a p , ;yr : lit•"til +1:i ir� r,, s , �;,e Y i .ys rl�
- 71>
��,�,. ww '� �y...� cq � „,,urr'... f fb.i 7 '; �F.• K:oF` " a..,. .., . 7 1 ( " J. .
- '- •F•SP ",+fYrA"�JL�.f /tiY -tii-r Y i i - 3 i , _ E��� j ^"` 5,,, ...
... � '�"' 7r�2 Yr•..' � �: r' f I ' r t� ``i I I t - 'f , fl_
. - r < :. ht r A •: , � i .. Tr r F j� '3 fi r. ''if � -
_. -
.�• �•iva,ti• t �•. t a 7
-
f ! a -. r rti✓ . I 5 n7, .• .s s- r'r`'/.La�t+ .rr- y},L�o cyy rht °]"` 4'
I , , .. ., i �' •-.. •+'s'n'a....sr - `n°hi/1r7,M. �nr..>atgcfc- . „,,,,t .r ,
A
x' xr�if Y�y� ;4'r'T`5_'r`i��3M�'�f,.,�J1�'j' i (�'• 1 5 ��. / j\
o- ' i ..ac,° Y ' i ���r5" -F _ F - I . 1 r • t , , i i • •'�
�� � � •�' .#•S�.�f'��f��e,�'. � ' + F ' . '1 1� ` i • i
t-�^P i S �• . r a nt z^�p`.. �>✓i {- r ,,.� .. ) f / ii i / ' f �
I a� '��`� i�,.', +�� -.. �' i, '.R � i .. y 'I: _ / .
- • �cfs" I f ��� •t� j w•''
i 6 � � f • / � � # Y � 1 UY rf� � ��R�.� i
f u - + 1 4 � J1" �. � 1 T j f A • • v r - � ,' •
O
Zi
a9y_
Y _
M x
le)
ot-
eo.
22
��rrov�ncl►�nq Si9,�S
1J r {
t 7 . , .
":
( ,t - ` ,
! <
+ I t
i.1J { 7 f. r r r 1., s
�i
'( 1 �� i �, k 3 G t 3I�tl
i 1
'- I f t ' . ..� x!' f�3rp�s ?C�? ryN `� i «r r
' 1. � ' ` A
f •� i.:.V1✓ i r 1 - � . i t lfll�T ,,, 1 r ;, ,*,(r) � rt 6 4 '�31s tS iir! ? r r �p����yv / . irt,. A . .
! f ' 1� t 4 1 x r( �s J r 1 '•' y th r:,� rfl�����p,yyyi:';'' �'Y�" r
r �': •` s�1; r 3 j`, x .h c ti :t 2 t ; i ( ` 111 1 ' l 1 1!'{ I � ip ,r r
t, 4-.i 'i 7, 11. 1. i r % T 'r, C 7 7. jf .., i...,,.- r ' q ,: i' .. II6S6: ✓.i 'I "'�,3i r:. II
i
( rl k "%� 5 1 4 N l,; , .�, 3�' j r 13x1, It 1! 1.'
,x ,,i : ) '_. r +,.>, u t i r „ y Ta:r v. r. r - %'q [ �. Y 1 A.- ..i ..et ,Ll} i
�'' arrP 7'Y R '�' rt 1 1 ci +a f.ofr 3 �, tr+tT F.�y} ( 15:F,1,, t
1 \ 1 , 4 y ?. �`r 4'r:) 7 �, � y - :r_i i 7 i i✓. t it r 'e x t a- s P - .., f. ti 'f �` i
, }'l V"�%'S :l }.7_ n 1 /. / d. 1n i x i 1 1 r ' �!.]?.: sw•S�J '' 7:e t -r', r E
�_ r 'r!. E.r.-'a:.-,� f.l.}1-t ..,,a1,. Ar�j,:,. L -cc!'!-' * 1 ns 4{ ( .�- ,�,?, 'y'r {;
7 �.;� + ,v,;-aLy 4 i�syrr frDtC,� 'b, f re1'i .ts. "ilk. iyu; �h t r '<. ,P J, -i >,. ,
t 3. t, ;, .,r t, ltl " ..�,1 tj r ..ql .7' ;4. 3f �*' 11,11-1 x' yl4,,� .,-.k /Li y..s t, Jl )?!�� �:!7j ^ c �1 ti r✓ n ,t'' r .t.
7. ';.f xy d ,,.y"I .i �Sx;,,.l.l.,.. yr.`: 1.. �:r.A,,7,,, L'+ .o- :.S -,rJ .t:.. :;�' !'` z) "::aT�.. t"3 �,',1 .;: t _ r. _
r ,,,, ^' ' {x !xt { 7!!t - f.fr �x1 , rc•(( '" ) j -yr t r. t ! :. .v7. .� 1, ' ,.rbc,.: l 1 f
�� - i t .,; '���.',.,, r'6 n`•,,,* t.v .Y.4 a, ,i a. 'I^li !; «t.S.. r,,R,F,-,,,. ,">'. -,, ;' "� f'rrI1 t � ; t �S r
3' 's"!, ji Sft ,n�,ti,. sf.•rytY�df.� e� rx a. 7 - S:�.}-d.�. ,�11 `7 -,r Ja YK .T 7 �r i 1 1. .: t i 1 r t- i -'t 7 i - 1
_I, y_- Y -?S, -, -"c- ✓l .7f -x f'f' r'C�, 7 1'?t�j rF'y,c. ifi?. .;y :t?ter $it �1 , i f ep �.f .1 :,, ,1,1 i !' lE r .
, r Y,. i �qy 1., t:J .yf yy- ( ty 7.i 1"Yy ll�`$,#a T.. - Nr 744,,,,, t c /;.ti ! R;-<.�u,F:i. ��„' 7 ,'1 ` i. .1 7 ,
.y i �,t4 v, r. + ' !) '.'.£,1 x, ',', _ . r,4 Vii. .k„t ,.xuy, 5z`<£R+-F- '.L S , i � ,+r�ttt-%-�F=�• , �%,'t� u�>r`r„rt.',y..^-,".;r & . ? ,,,:7-�:,.:... :.:;i`Y io. s ti -�
,� Y,: f h.fi�gy.;pra. <,`-.QS-'`.t.;j::�?'v r>�S, rf.-�',tt.. ,. �.ti''S�ia�li',,,;r-.t - ..1;:_L:.7 r,;s'1 �Y.,, ”" ,.�. F� ..t r,.:; -'e
i » "'.( ;;? .45" i.:-�cY' rr .�#i`Yc:F 1 r- �>.},, f t " ,3 ��, .,n. �:/ ..3 ,,,>• t` n, r Fb. h _ /
-,, y_ _i i.°•),e :. Y7 :. +'-,silrr-0 . x..37 v, ,r3 -r ;'fir y(?f t <<-`s'}S,, it l r, °YP4':" t'f- r,.:)7"{" , if.s r.
s + . { ;•r��S t `�,. i n 1 t Y i2r �ltt? f l yz ct s«;i.`, , 1t
L3R t t 7: R }� Fy r;. +��� s°i i -,t hr , F��fv� i 1 ( i (' %11 1, F
F, �;;, r, tL. ,� {j ted i'`4"}`' t�' r s't rdt' e Sf t W't�- b r+� 1 �1`� 1 � `. e.
::3 �� .sail.'ti+7.[� _;F,; ,� l ;Y;t.�'! `r �g"j, t`v#'`»r?:� a r C?ee'��}`7{-(�xx�s3fJ +i 't 1 _' L - ,>- jil. F + - ' H
?}:'1?'f'."7ti� 3f�ye�'.S ;,.'y �.1� �G'¢�;,, ,.y3 )Hifi :1..j .xz�r}r.ii i• L, 7 .} !+'a r1 S G - ) - ,
;7e,. ,ria f`$, i3:3. 4 ,i �'3�..rs:,..a: "'''�•t`ScF S: fq i`•y�`+J >• 3-: �r �{ ..n'. M1: ,�h r i •:l
-:f.;. „l �c:-.. EYJS?Ti?r.. ,,. '. `h. cI.
Im, ,�- .;y7,ta« j%t r � -�,•, "r• ,f rrj
J ..+i ','Pt^„� l '.�'.-,,,,,,-,4,,'_'i's.�5,,y�;' f:'•'Y,'Z.,1 ,t1s-r ,S!,y5�bi v?`t�-,.Fv ct fit. �r ." �z f ':i r:a ,f R': 7' li r ! ( =.t r" <
{- '' ' e' _ , r�='3� , :kt�u,.}yffY X13 -'S: l4:; ,T, �,yr, Y z i f v �:: '� �i'.St Y4 'fit a f :.i
rbs' _. +(rS' �� Sgt ` . i. `" Iirr�d�y: .- r �y-� SE c�1 "i.� y l.J I.2Z S;+`� 1 1 .✓5:,...-,.: °yf„� ,/ +i ' {ice
* 1,
. .ri c ,a•,. r.a ri°{;"�•l <. • 'Y_}¢` r Y., f 4y T W' { 1 G- i �I tS t i r
= t F��1 f 3\f h. 1 'ji,,r£ 'ts ?*4r -: n>'. c [ -r C ' lr r
r .-. h Ff r 73� 34 yblj ,Yt�i ';( ouY,tJ J -1 ! Y r .,,, �.?' " t j z 7 7 %' . f r. f ,
t,r e. .4. ' I y,S}'`�' "� €I
�`"i`l,-,:' _:C -;;�� !- -� e.:l +rr :( r .i:- i t- w ` { S.- t:'.. .
/ s, :r . 31. 1 r 3t
+ (`' it ��`l r `f f 6 ; t i °' t '' -+ -,4 � c . ,.:
r.'+ {:fib '+� i'fr 31 7 !" �Fif�,=wm1zw!vimr i,wIj: f �i-t:7 f t .'' 'f I f -.rr f r_ ., . t.. :, f bl�:��m
firIml at 0 03150.
,. A .* _ e, _^ 1e 7
f " i..nV"' .. -
" .:v:::'' jM.. r. i�.a.�[:�7.,4 BRa,YFrr*,r,n_.+..
. _
..
f.
y ,). .:
.. ,.
f _ .
., '
. ..
s�
�or,Ns- EAZ)l
WAP)
.
. I .
�
� .. . .. . . .. . . . I
. .. ..-f-r n;
I . I . (53..
9h
x
.
.
.
.-�t
-�
W�ae)
. � I . .
`B�. .R�r� �or� s,-R,-ga t - . ''.
. . . .
a. .o
I .
. . . .
. I � . .
. . . .
I . I .
. . I
,- . .---.--.,----.---.---..-------------�-------------------
I . . . .
. . .
..... I
. .
I . .
. . . .
. ... .
- . I ...
.I
. ..
. �.
. . .� .� . ..
. .. . . . : .. � . I.
,r. I xit [L r•p?- q3 4t �' `4"v,E_`T'S y- ?: 7 s ? t• i ,i''- t' T {'C r -
q evr' '� y .+lf Si f $� r S: i 1 r s ^ 3 r. f _
.r .s ', raxss't'�i a4yT '>.i s -'. 1 - r
,rr-�Fafi'cre z°5� r f `g7'4r -rFq,,- r,„ ---r F, r �fi x t _
.yF'e.' ,,i,x e.�'. ��,,�� y�YrFz-4J ti r { { 1 t. r,.- r r.; �. i
I- IrY' 5 y-Q{'Fi�"'r 3��-5�?4-`k,� 3 t,-�. 1 i �...� �1' { ..? A
�}�fitt :,::. `�t r4 7;:i�1-f`v. <� .,`._ -'� - r
``.ww. a� `�'_' ... zY ? - Z"rcv ) r tfc, u� ?{ rr` .ft F `i L".-✓, 1`'d� it c r ,- ,�z x�r �wz�
!t . , , Y, ��,.r C! -^'y''4 ^t a j� �- -r'o - t :1+:> + �� r '''Fk+''ra F ,r.t' -: �j2� 5;: �i 5- 41. + i r i ;r,, r.r
1` s , r, -m ,s tr - fi c 7�r i
-epi. - '�. !K i;s - F J Sa .,yc :t - ,- f•$' V:S � . � 4•r .y r' rt -c�'O` ,+t- -r 1 4:
.a . q. fj a ��r.T r ''wrf t f --tom* >rl _,�- \ a ,{Y� .ttY _ - 1.
�( �{
^x }•.-e Y n. ti this ,, .rev 4 , r.: r 'i},.- .. ::J _ r ?':. n`'{' +. ice' - . ,3� e < 's' 3 _-a
4;g. ri.,-s:?i'r"�','-;sem.- _.�: k-�� � r 'c*•rr j.z, ` x r� k . K. _ r : r '.xu. r�_ ti' ri `� r n ; vz�` � ., '
a 2,iz�pze5 1ewf 1 �� ru S 7 a Lzcl i
�i . :'t' ;, - .�4 4 rui Y h,' 1 : '"'"yds-`' .' x ` ' c 'rT' . � �7` .,.. Vii;, � , -.0
,'r "s : e rf� rgY tr _ha j� 3p t k i =s
li. ..mob , .. ' `'yy; ? a A Y> • d'a .. 1 ( y r r a.' ,��kr - n,-' f (h
'.Y (s x �a r p wr P a � 3 4r --- * fin ✓ r ,`�_ q� t,- `ju % " <
°7' 5 J �- " 2 ,mow as 7.^,. `7-c - YY -` l a a . f : j
7 t+y y YAK"; i n9',' rR' .f ls'r. d o- e' tti. �t�� �, . 7 )
+ .. "y��.-27'•'t` rt' `} ,I�c- �. t � y - - -- r ,C -F x� . _> Y" 5,
: Ex t Y,y'Y s>� tr -++ S t,. ,�- - .. 4 -,r g v .,ls "-,�* F l`k•} d'`,, 3 r c t r�, t
y -Sft- '`,£ i- 1�. , ' `a- _ t��'�' i't�2'' _ M1 .�("':`z, l O ` t�4 y /'
CC11115 5 �-tx' '.zy `,Yi l -ii r i-' tir o' it .. s � '' ( J � rt
g.
7 f ,ntyr„ �-.. tT� 1LJy c vl 5 i11 — C, - ,., �l y } •S' ., r . ,v- .
- r). • s • r
: �. -�.rr rt �,r• _. moi: ,,..t ern.. t.
r :>i
Y - / - .
ilt
( -. J.S : ri -
�uY y� _
- r; 11 5
t4i
. 1 .
7i+
s�
�or,Ns- EAZ)l
WAP)
.tea '-MM!''��� ,� raj ��°"�! � .. ': ' n J• �I"�!�' -
RX
r ti,3",S
ti f 41 -F
Senior N
Civilig j
?'itl fi.vclti�uut( tilrec(
AM .r,.r. R. I M-1, .rr,.� x�x:.?�i.'7.�'•w.aa,�:'�rla'"
s {�-.,.anxt`s'yol�'�i«+?,'�. ary. ,fat r.Y-�'"T•� 3 �. '' - s+�s;s£c'$
��� +• � �ar Y � rw '> Zfr
�`) l -nwr aka, y s1 `e ,rt r -E �+ `�"5 '�`'7'F1x�''S+.•`t,r "s��vs''^�.xi.
v ; vrcw carrcl*5� ���A MR WO
° as�tocYr��T,`p� « &?aT�
._ .. ... t.-..-.— �'1__4�' -—+'x�•Sa.=-»::.'.i'�.:s�sdU..c..�,�.w.�.:..4 -F. wV� j �•. �"c'ti,'�'Y�.3'Sx�''� '4t� s,�y,c�ih ..'.r.�„s r
.'•'^'..�R '+F«+f •.gvy.mre -pct
,i
r/ r
:f it •���j�l � ,,!
{ _yx �r_i r F r}✓. ..,/' 9'y'='Y .I-,'„r"�%ir2-"J a.,,y �G Irou
.� j._:jj
f.� .. - .;f -
i5lt it
:qtr r c •� \� �' i.. .. I l edvtal`aaM a ,.... '',
r Y ,
tH t, ����'s r
4.
' : rt .��' A'� ..` `' r tir?J�, ny Yar�� +��! ;s -.x L � : •��. "' - "a1
� u F _r -'� 'rw�'a�}rh•,r w xt s 3 f' �, t`�. hr• F ,�' _ `ate t_ ,�i-z..�.. --L �, .. ,�'”.
+� y�i'1yjY �r'T'` t •tsar � f' f J t. �. t rf � $ `,`t
•,r.} -"S yy!1gfi�..iTi..u7f �cz rt.A
t ♦ a +w F Rst.a't� `?4a'> ^sa„c_''` w ea- r- [ ��,.� �• f 1 xnxc :4 ;
M,a'4r ?t " -Y`�
.'rA '�X� �`� ,..,5;^L�i "�Pt�s•.�.�'°y 7Ap�1'� !• �„PaT•�c �� i ` t`�• - 'a 3 •
iay+� d !f H '�..7rrr..rY•'.i'`.e'd'�.p. � r t� w- � r �' M� �' h ? -
�JL.c�ci
j Y (
r.
Attachment I I
Shahn Finwall
From:
Al.Hirschler@USONCOLOGY.COM
Sent.
Monday, January 06, 2003 5:32 PM
To:
-S hann.finwa11@ci.map1ewood.mn.us
Cc:
Peter.Bartling@USOncology-com
Subject:
Neighborhood Survey
Dear Ms. Finwall:
e are in receip,of your letter dated. December 13 2002 regarding the
.W
Markham Pond Sig n at 1570 Beam Avenue and appreciate your ..asking for our
comments.
.We are very much opposed to the granting of a variance. foi the , sign a's
..proposed by Tillges'.
more of 'a retail
The osed s* e and. reflects
.pro e. ign is grossly oversize ,
advertisement than an- identification sign for an office comp,l.ex.It appears -
to be tryi . ng to allow the building owner to list., , individual tenants of_the
proj*ct on the sign in addition to the pro] ect. itself. This not only is..
e
distracting - but could also.pose a danger to traffic.as cars might suddenly
r
slowdownin the traffic .lanes in order for the -occupants. to read all of
the
o e
names n.the sign. The sign should only reflect the name of the r-
devel'opmentf with additional signs erected in the interior of the
.development.to help visitors itors to locate their intended destination..
.
We believe that Mr. Till es' business and others. in..his development will be.
"'destination"- locations for their-clients.and visitors as is our location
to
our patientsand visitors. There is no need for such a large and complex
sign. This is not an "impulse" location that typically would use such a
Tillges will have the opportunity -to have
large s gn. In-addition,,�Mr.
signage on Hazelwood to further identify his location. -
We believe that the sig n.should be more consistent with the sign' for our
cancer'center,,.especially since it'is.,in.such close proximity to -our
building.
Thank you for letting us comment.
Incoming mail.iscertified Virus Free..
Checked by AVG .anti-virus system .(htt.p:.//www.grisoft-com)o'
Version:.6.0.435 Virus Database: 244 - Release 12/30/2002
25
Date 12/31/02
To: Shann Finwall, Associate Planner
Cc Chief David Thomalla
From: Lt. Kevin Rabbett i -
RE: Project Review,. Markham Pond Office Building, Sign Variance
I have reviewed the project description and attachments.
I am very concerned about the reduction in visibility that would occur if the sign were placed as
indicated in the variance request. I 'believe that the sign support posts would severely limit the visibility
of drivers attempting to exit the premises onto eastbound Beam Ave. They would not be able to see
approaching traffic from the west until, their northbound vehicles. were on the . pedestrian/bicycle path.
The fact that the exiting vehicle would have to advance onto the path to see vehicular traffic also
endangers westbound pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Finally; if the exiting vehicle is moving at any
speed, its sudden. appearance from behind the sign is likely to startle eastbound .Beam Ave drivers and
caused panic braking and result in accidents. There is great potential for serious injury in any of these
accident scenarios because of the relatively high [45 MPH] speed limit on Beam Ave.
The proposed sign location is unacceptable by public safety standards.
Please call with any comments or questions, x4532
.12/31/02
26
Attachment 13
Robert Tillges, CPO, FAAOP
Tillges Certified Orthofic' Prosthetic, Inc.
Tillges 0 P, Inc.
1983 Sloan Place — Suite 7 — Maplewood, MN 55117
(651) 772-2665 Phone - (651) 771-6553 Fax
To: Director, Community Development Department,. City of Maplewood, MN
From: Robert Tillges
CC:
Date: 12/4/02
Re: Zoning Code Variance (Signage) — Supplemental Statement to Variance Application
.Message:
This memo provides supplemental. information to our application for a signage setback variance for bur
new building at 1570 Beam Avenue, Maplewood. This information explains how our request meets the
requirements the City must find in order to grant the zoning variance.
1.: We assert that the application of the current zoning code which would allow us signage no greater
than 5' in width (rather than the 15' width previously approved .by the City), and which would. be set
back farther from Beam Avenue .than current busi-nesses, would cause us undue hardship for the
i following reasons:
a. For a business, especially along a busy thoroughfare, signage and sign location is one of the most
efficient and. effective means of communication. Signage:
• Allow clients to find us
• Presents an image of the facility/business
rl
Tells people who we are and what services we provide
• Must be noticeable and readable from a distance
s•
• Is. one of the most permanent investments a.' business will make.
f
t
F .
The current City of.Maplewood setback ordinance wouldrequire us to place signage that is inadequately
small and outside the normal site line along Beam Avenue. The vast majority of patients that we serve
are referred to us from physicians al I over the Twin Cities, the seven-county. metropolitan area & western
p
i Wisconsin. Many are elderly. The location of our building near major roadways is_ of utmost importance
t, to the individuals we serve. A small, setback sign will greatly diminish our patients' ability to locate our
site: Further, because of the traffic speed on Beam Avenue (typically 45 mph), a sin set back in a
p (Yp Y g
s� blinded area could create a traffic hazard.. Conversely, a. sign of- sufficient size, easily read from a
distance, and appropriately placed will assure than drivers. and their passengers can find our services
without creating a• safety hazard for themselves or other drivers. For these reasons, we believe the r
e rn o
d
reasonable use of our property will be diminished unless we are granted the- requested variance. -
27
b.. Inherent in the parcel of property we purchased is poor visibility from Beam Avenue. The location and
size of our sign is vital to. correct a- poor visible location by substituting .effective visual communication for
poor site characteristics With our building setback and poor visibility, sign. location& size will overcome
any access difficulty for the citizens of Maplewood and surrounding areas who. choose to use our
services- or those of the other businesses in our building.
c. The granting of this. variance would not alter the essential character of the area: In fact, granting the
variance would provide conformance 'and . consistency with - the sign locations of the. neighboring
businesses. Please find attached to this -memo a letter from one of our neighbors, Daniel J. Gatto, DDS
of Maplewood Oral and Maxillofacial Survery, P.A.,.who is supportive of our request.
2. It is our belief that the spirit and intent of the current setback variance is to provide businesses
and users with adequate identification, without clutter or interference with other properties. Our proposed
signage would not violate these objectives in any way. Our signage would be attractive, informational,
and consistent with our neighbors' setback to the east and west of our site. Since there is no available
space for our neighbors to push back their signs, the granting of this variance seems the logic solution to
provide consistence and order.
We hope that our application and the statement above are sufficient for your purposes... We will greatly.
appreciate a favorable ruling on the Markham Pond Professional- Center signage setback variance
request. If any additional information is required, I would appreciate your informing me directly so we
may address this matter immediately.
Sincerely,
Robert Tillges, CPO, FAAOP'
Chairman, Paris Realty v
Attachment 14
ti
MAPLEWOOD ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY P
VAE3
Daniel ).Gatto, D.D.S. Marshall L. Wade, D.D.S.
DIPLOMATES OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF- ORAL AND MA-XIL-LOFA-CIAL SURGERY
November 25, 2002
City of Maplewood
RE: - MARKHAM POND PROFESSIONAf , CENTER
BEAM AVENUE SIGNAGE
Dear City. of Maplewood:
As one of the property and building owners of the Hazelwood on Beam Maplewood
Professional Building at 1560 Beare Avenge, I submit this letter to you for consideration
regi: ding the Mar"l&�am Pond d Professional Centero'ect. This building project under
Pr J g J
P
the direction and. ownership of Mr. Robert Tillgcs of the Tillg es Certified Orthotic
Prosthetics, Inc. is a wonderful addition to our area. This adds to the
-
professional environment that has been established over these last 'several ears.
_ y
When we completed our. building in I X84, we were able tolace a marquee sign P q on our .
Beam Avenue and Hazelwood entrances which allowed for the appropriate setbacks as
established at that time..' Several years later, the Cancer Care 'Center, located next to us
likewise was able to place signage on Beam Avenue in accordance with the setback
ordinances at that thee.- However, it is my understanding that the signage ordinances
have changed so that the setback for the Markham. Pond Professional Center, located on
the Beam Avenue thoroughfare -would bc'required to have a fin-ther setback.. This would
create some definite visual problems with regard to traffic flow and patient access to their, -
.
building.
I would certainly be in support of a variance for this setback ordinance to allow the
Markham Pond Professional Center marquee signto be laced in a position consistent
q P
With our sign as well as the CancerCare Center. I do not+ feel that this would create any
problem for our property or those next to us. and :would provide a very consistent 'marq' uee
signage.
If I can be� of fiirther support or helpin this matter, I certainly would not hesitat ' to b '
Y e be
contact with you. Hopefully, you will rule favorably on this variance for this Markham
Pond Professional Center signage. `
Sin ly _
J
Daniel atto, DOS
Managing Partner, Maplewood Professional Associates -
Cc: Mr. Robert Tillges
Mr. Alan Tretrnan
Maplewood Office Woodbury Office Forest Lake Office
1560 BEAM AVENUE 9950 VALLEY CREEK RD., SUITE 100 20'N. LAKE -ST., SUITE 201
MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 � WOODBURY, MN 55125 � FOREST LAKE, MN 55025
(651) 770-8396 (651) 578-7000 (651) 464-8558
1-800-368-5978 1=800-368-5978 1-800=368-5978
Attachment 15
JAN_ 14 ' 03 04 : 53PM P. 2
HealthEast &.1 1 fi9Nniv..e
rsBy Avenue west
Suite 400.
*'St. Paul, MN 55104
851-�3�-4980 ••
651.232.491 FAX
January 14, 2003. _
City of Maplewood
.1955 Clarcnce St.
Maplmvood, NW 55109
RE: Markham Pond Professional Center
Beam, avenue Signage
Dear City of Maplewood:
As a representative of HealthEast St. John's Hospital.' I submit this letter to you for consideration
E
regarding the Robert Tillges' Markham Pond Professional Center project, This- building -project
'is a wonderful addition to the area. and adds to tlzc ' medical professional environment that has
been established over the last several years,
It is . my understanding that the signage g a e ordinances have changed so that the setback for the
Markham • Pond Professional Centcr- located on the. Beam Avenue thoroughfare ,would be-
' required to have a further setback. This would create some definite '.visual problems with regard
}
Ys to traffic flow and patient access. to their building.. ;•:... .: - .:� ` ;�i:...
HealthEast would certainly be in. support of a variance for this setback ordinance to ' allow the
�Y pp
Markham Pond professional Center marquee sign to be laced in a position consistent with other
si e m the area, I do .not feel that this wvuld�ereatc mi rob1cm four aur
r, g Y P P PY V
i • .. /. iTAX✓' ,
r'i� ff
If Y cats be of further support or help to this. matter, I certainly, would not hesitate t` a In contact
with you. Hopefully! you will rule favorably on this . earlanc ' for . this t Markham Pond
Professional Conter signage.'`
a -
Sincerely,
}
a
Y
lc• Davis
` •'7.yS
"G
System Director Finaz�ce/Real Estate
: Y
HealthEast Care S ystem
4i Q Rdbert Til es
i
r.•t
Roofed :n
Judeothchrisliall"';alues, our miss * n s!1,
r ��;.
K*y
f
.. hih ualit corn asslori Ee cvst-erC ective health pare yr the wrnrnu f es � et
JPS 5 .T ♦. ` i4b:`, r N w L3 i•1 P>x,.: '., -
An Equal OpportunilylA�Irmative Ac�lcn Employer -
' ,t.,
Attachment 16
AZURE PROPERTIES
A O. BOX 17830
ST. PAUL, MN 551,17-7830
(651) 484-0070
(FAX) 486-3444.
December 27, 2002 ACSIMILE
651-748-3096
Shann Finwall
Associate Planner
Office of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1380 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Objection to Signage Variance
.Markham Pond Sign
1570 Beam Avenue
Dear Shann,
am in receipt of your letter of December 13, 2002, regarding a proposal fora 14 ft wide by 20 ft tall free-
standing sign servicing the new office building. Azure Properties manages -the office building at 1650 Beam
Avenue and the unimproved land located east of the Maplewood Cancer Center. This letter is to express our
objection to the proposed new signage. Our specific objection is to the width of the proposed sign.
The existing hospital and office buildings have sign widths as follows:
St. Johns Hospital, 1575 Beam Avenue West Sign - 8 ft wide
St. Johns Hospital 1575 Beam Avenue East Sign — 7 ft wide
Maplewood Cancer Center 1580 Beam Avenue 8 ft wide
Hazelwood on Beam 1560 Beam Avenue 8 ft wide
Maplewood Office Park 1650 Beam Avenue- 5 ft wide
`-The proposed sign with dimensions of 14 ft wide by 20 ft tall is far too massive and would overwhelm other
signage in this area:
This new office building should not be permitted signage which is more than twice. as massive as St. Johns
Hospital or the other office buildings in the neighborhood.
Please call ifl can answer any questions regarding this ma#ter. My direct dial telephone number is 651-486-
3452.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Thomas M. Schuette
On behalf of Azure Properties
TMS/kl
31 ,
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN. -REVIEW BOARD
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2003
a. I. Markham Pond Medical Office Building (1570 Beam Avenue) — 'Robert
Tillges' Request for a Sign. Setback Variance,
Ms.. Finwall said Robert Tillges is developing a 23,094 -square -foot office building called
Markham Pond Medical Office Building at 1570 Beam Avenue.
Ms. Finwall said the office building would house Mr. Tillges' existing prosthetics and orthotics
practice (currently located at 1983 Sloan Place, Maplewood) as well as other medical -type
tenants. Two freestanding signs are -proposed for the office 'building, one along Hazelwood
Street and the other along. Beam Avenue. Both signs are proposed at 14 -feet; 8 -inches wide
.by 20 -feet, 2 -inches tall. The Hazelwood Street -sign will maintain a setback of 10 feet to the
right-of-way line and the Beam Avenue -sign will be constructed right up to the right-of-way,
with no setback.
Ms. Finwall said during the subdivision of Mr. Tillgesproperty from. the Maplewood Cancer
Center's property in 1997, the city required a 15 -foot -wide_ by 15 -foot -deep sign easement
-along Beam. Avenue on the Maplewood ..Cancer Center's property. This easement was
required in order to allow Mr. Tillges' property .to have a freestanding sign on Beam Avenue.
The sign easement was created prior to the city's requirement that freestanding signs' maintain
a 10 -foot setback from. the. right-of-way. Mr. Tillges. is requesting a ..10 -foot .sign setback
variance in order to construct the.. Beam Avenue sign right up to the right-of-way, with no
setback.
Ms. Finwall said staff would be supportive of Mr. Tillges' sign setback variance if a*smaller sign
were proposed.. As it stands, however, a large sign constructed in this .location will block traffic
visibility and will not be compatible. with the surrounding existing office signs.
Board member Shankar asked if the. main access would be gained on Beam Avenue or on
Hazelwood Street?
Ms. Finwall said there are two accesses to the property, one on Beam Avenue and one on
Hazelwood Street. Phase I of Mr. Tillges' development .would probably mainly..gain access_ on
Beam Avenue and the Phase -II would probably mainly gain access on Hazelwood Street:
Board .member Olson asked if the size of the sign is still 20 feet in height?
Ms. Finwall said Mr.. Tillges did reduce the width of .the sign. from ' 17 feet to 14 feet but the
height.still remains 20 -feet tall.-
Chairperson
all.Chairperson Ledvina clarified the height of the sign- was not up,for"discussion because it had
already been approved by the city council, is that correct?
Ms. Finwall said the height of the sign was approved by the city council in the comprehensive
sign .plan, with the condition that a 10 -foot sign setback from the'r-o-w is obtained. Since Mr.
Tillges is requesting a variance to that setback, the height of the sign can be addressed.
The applicant, Mr. Robert Tillges at 1200 Junction Avenue, addressed the board. Mr.. Tillges is:
the applicant for the Markham Pond Medical Office Building at 1570 Beam Avenue. Mr. Tillges
said his medical- office building . has the potential of eight to ten tenants. He has just learned
from staff this evening that he has a 5 ft.. by 5 ft. potential for a sign easement. There is space
for a 15 -foot -wide by 15 -foot -deep sign, however, there are setbacks required. Mr. Tillges said
he literally has, 5 ft. by 5 ft. for a sign for a 23,000 square -foot professional building and he
thinks that is enough justification for -'a sign variance: He said the signs would be the same'
size for. both entrances at Beam. Avenue and Hazelwood Street. He does not feel- his sign will
cause. any visibility prob.lems.
Mr. Tillges brought a' -photo of the area for board . members to show where his sign would be
located on Beam Avenue. He feels there is clear visibility down to the street side. He thinks it
would be a detriment to set back the sign fro.m Beam Avenue when drivers are going 45 mph
and a person suddenly sees the medical office building and- quickly tries to stop causing. an
accident. The majority of his customers are senior citizens and could have a hard time finding
his complex if the sign is set back. He said he tried to work with the Maplewood Cancer
Center but was unsuccessful in getting a revised sign easement to accommodate them. This
is. the reason he is - applying for the variance. He said his building has a Beam .Avenue
address, the building faces Beam Avenue, and that was his main. intent of purchasing this
property. Beam -Avenue is a we'll -known street in this. area to people inside and outside the
city.
'.
Board member Olson asked if the sign on Hazelwood Street would be identical to the sign on
Beam Avenue?
Mr..Tillges said it is an identical sign structure that they had .approval for from the city council. .
In thep rocess of building this medical office building it was . easier setting a jig for the metal
structures for the signs to- be built only one time. He said this is the reason the metal
structures are pre -manufactured and stored on the property already. He had hoped. to have
the signs in place already.
Board member Olson asked how, the Maplewood Cancer Center building compared in size to
his proposed medical office building?
Mr. Tillges said he has no idea what the -building size comparison was.. However, his building
will have, multiple -tenants and the Maplewood Cancer Center has only one tenant.
Mr. Tillges said his building sits back on Beare Avenue quite a distance .and, without the
visibility of the building the sign becomes a marker for people to find his building.
Board member Shankar said even though a setback is .being requested you should still. have
no problem seeing -the Markham Pond Medical Office Building sign if the sign were made
smaller to.fit in with the scale of the Maplewood Cancer Center sign.
Mr. Tillges said if you set the sign back a person could be driving down Beam . Avenue and
almost drive past the sign before they actually realize that's where they needed to go.
Mr. Tillges said he had another- letter of support from St.. John's. Hospital to share with the
board. Chairperson Ledvina asked him to give the letter to staff.
Board member Longrie-Kline asked Mr. Tillges what response was given when he ,tried to get
a different sign easement?
Till owns the Maplewood Cancer Center. He said .he has
Mr. T�Ilges said a corporation in Texas p
been communicating
with Mr. Al Hirschler from US Oncology via telephone. Basically Mr.
p
Hirschler .said
at this time the Maplewood Cancer- Center will not. pursue any allowance -for a
sign easement and for this reason Mr. Tinges is requesting a sign .setback variance.
' vina asked Mr. Till es 'if he could get.the changes to the sign easement would
Chairperson Led 9
he.9 o ahead with the. signs?
• n money invested in this development and he needs to
Mr. T�Ilges said he has a lot of time and .y
Ice. Anything he can do to ex edite this he said he' would do. He wants to be a
get a sign in p a y g p
or in the nei ' hborhood, 'he has a lot of physician and medical community support
good neighb g
move forward in a positive way. He feels .with this sign variance he should be
and he wants tom p .
able to move forwardquickly. g
uickl . Mr. Till es said he wants to get his, building up and running.
first approach would be to increase the size of the
Chairperson Ledvina-asked Mr. Tillges if his. fir pp
sign easement?
and eve of the way there have been
Mr.. Till es said he started this project back in Ju y every step. g . consideration in this .
setbacks and struggles. He said he just wants to be given some
development.
' is a co of an e. -mail from Al Hirschler at
Board member Olson said in the staff report therecopy
r o inion his words are stronger than "they will n.ot pursue an allowance.
US Oncology and in he p g
for a sign easement
nothing he can do about that. He said 'it has not been -a very positive
Mr. Tillges. said there is g
Ma lewood Cancer Center representatives and there - are a lot of
experience working with the p
with the planning and development of this project.. He said he would like to move
other issues wi p g . p .
itive way in the cit granting him a sign setback variance for this project.
forward in a pos y Y g g
Mr.Tillges said the city had opportunity an o ortunit to make .this right and could have had the planning
but the didn't. He understands the. city is unable . to.. do that, but
department help him out,.
y
r via the tele hone does not make JI -easy when we are .trying to help
working with Mr. Hirschle p
him visually understand this situation.
_ challenge Mr. Till
Board member Olson said she does not mean to chap es but it seems that he has g g
hada lot of help- from the city.
She asked him if he knew how many other variances he had
received?
• regarding this sign setback variance. He
Mr. Tillges said he is only talking about the issues g g g
this situation through the.city and he was told it would
. was hoping he would be able to expedite 9
not be a problem. When
he communicated with the city he discovered it was a problem. He
t the cit 's fault -only judgment on his part with whom he had hired.said it was no y Y poor g
Mr. Jerry Jer Anderson of LAMB Architects addressed
the board. He saidone of the items he
ro subdivision and the permanent access that was used
would Ike to point out is the property y
•divisionro ert that was done in October 1997. He said subsequent to that
. during the of this property y
setbacks were changed. Nr. Anderson said one
happened when this pro of the. things that
.the city's sign ordinance.
. g .
was subdivided was the access to a piece of property that other
property
not have had access if it were .again subdivided. A portion of that property was
wise may .
(wood Street and the - remainder of the property would no longer -be
accessible from Haze.1w..
accessible. He said there was a permanent easement created across the property thatwas 30
feet wide for An access onto Beam Avenue. He said an .area. 15 -feet -wide by 15 -feet -deep
was established as. a sign. easement.
Mr.. Anderson said unfortunately, the fact that the city's sign ordinance was about to. be
..changed was never taken into .consideration with regards -to.the 15 ft..by *15 ft. area. set aside
for the sign easement. * He said if you look at. the attachments. and photos of' signs provided by -
staff .there are only two signs that would fit the 5 ft. by 5 ft. area to build a sign. Mr. Anderson
said that tells him there is something substandard about this particular piece of property.. They
a Lied for the signage plan at the time ,the building plan was submitted for review, and.
pp g
approved. They have since redesigned the signs twice. They do- meet the" request. of- the
CDRB, theplanningcommission and the city council.* relating to the size of the sign. Mr.
Anderson said they have worked.with Mr. Hirschler for four months to try and attempt to obtain
additional footage or to have the sign easement. revisited which would allow* thein to meet the
10 -foot setback requirement but. were unable to. do that. They are down to an area 5 ft. by 5 ft.
and are back to the CD -RB for a variance - to utilize - the signs.. The signage was already
approved roved and nothing was stated fo-.them.at that time regarding the setback.' It was not until
pp 9. .
they came in for a sign permit that they realized that there was a problem. The problem was
associated with both the size of the easement. and when it was .established., The subsequent
change signage e of the si g na a ordinance required that setback. They feel there is a. hardship that
.
exists with the ability to only- use .the 5 ft. by 5 ft. area in which to place- their signs. Mr.
Anderson said the signage in the staff. report is proof of hardship because there are only two*.
signs in the area that fit in the 5 ft. b 5 ft. area.
9 Y
Board. member Longrie-Kline said..she read Mr. Hirschler's letter and the main reason the
Maplewood Cancer Center was not oin to rant the sign easement was because the sign
going g
was going to be too large, She asked if anyone asked Mr. Hirschler if the sign, were. made
smaller would they change the sign easement?
Mr. -Anderson said that was not.stated to them. He said they were just refused an extension of.
the..easement. _ 9 Relative to the size of the Sign it meets the sign. ordinance. In his opinion it is
uncommon for a city .to say . this sign meets the requirements of the sign ordinance but then.
the listen to a property owner that says the medical office building sign is too' big. That does
Y p p Y Y
not make sense to .him. He. feels this property 'owner is trying to force them into a situation that
is'already p Y acceptable to the cit with the. exception of the sign setback. It is in -Mr..-Hirschler's
.benefit to give Mr. Tillges the setback and that was explained to him. He said the farther the
sign is setback the less obstruction there is .to the Maplewood Cancer Center building. He said
by not giving Mr. Tillges the setback and requiring him to come in and apply for a setback, he
is creating the same problem that he is arguing about,
Chairperson Ledvina.said thesign n is sitting on the Maplewood Cancer Center's property and
p 9 9
Mr. Hirschler has a right to comment and. object.
Mr. Anderson said Mr. Hirschler said he did set aside an area for a sign set back in 1997.
Chairperson Ledvina said 'back in 1997 a 15 -foot -wide by 15 -foot -deep sign easement may
have occurred but that was before the modification of the sign ordinance.
Mr. Anderson said that was his understanding.
Chairperson Ledvina asked if there was proof of documentation of that?
• the property back in 2001 there was .an Estopple
Mr. Tillges said when. he purchased p p y
Agreement signed by the Maplewood lewood Cancer Center that an easement was. in place and. was
. .
rt of the transaction.
pa. .
Board member Longrie
'-Kline said t pp g he Esto le A reement , was a notice that gave you
.
the easement existed so you would know where it existed at the time you
information that
ert She said Mr. Till es bought the property knowing what the sign
. purchased the property. y g .
ordinances were at that time in 2001.
i he did not know the sigh ordinance had changed when he bought the. property.
Mr. Tillges said 9
He was under the assumption that the sign ordinance still existed as it .did in 1997.
Board member that is of the due diligence' of buying Longrie-Kline said unfortunately p
property.
• . Maplewood Cancer Center addressed the
Dr. Roger Johnson a medical oncologist at the
'
there are two concerns. One �s the safety to exit onto Beam , Avenue.
board. He thinks .
• • e other signs in the area because they are not' in the sight line of
Visibility. is.not a factor with.the g
trying to
exit onto -Beam Avenue. The second concern is the size of the sign..
• � other signs . in the area. The Maplewood .Cancer
Dr. Johnson said it does not fit in with the othe g
' e sign needs to I-ist all. of ' the tenants. It could just state the
Center doesn't understand why th g
building. He said to move the sign rig.ht' up to. the sidewalk is a
name of the medical office g
the sidewalk as -you would not be able to see- them at -all then. Dr.
danger to the people on Y
ff if theroblem was that there was only 5 ft. by 5 ft. for Mr. Tillges to put a
Johnson asked sta p
• d Cancer Center gives. him a sign easement to put a sign onto the
. sign up unless the Maplewood g
cancer center's property?
Ms. Finwall said correct.
reasonably sized like the others in -the area he does not
Dr. Johnson said if the sign would be re y .
an roblem'for the Maplewood Cancer Center. to allow the. Markham
think that there would be y p p .
Pond sign to be put on the property.
he knows the. size of the si n ' was already approved but he feels
_ .Board member Shankar said g
• • responsibility board to.pay due diligence to the size of the existing signs in the
. it is the responsibility of the p y g .
area.
'l n distinction within- the. -sign
-Kline asked staff if there was a siBoard member Longri
e for an office building sign ordinance g n verses a retail. sign? g
Ms. Finwail'said no.
•.
� � � issue of vis* with signs.ns. Back in
Char erson Ledv�na said the applicant brought up the s y g
p
s considerin the setback requirement the board was concerned: about
997 when the city was g
' ns causing visibility problems. He thinks that was the thrust of the
this exact problem of sig g Y p
' ' and even though. the old signs can't be. removed or made smaller, the
sign ordnance revision a g 9
board. can prevent future p g problems from occurring.. He pointed out the concerns expressed by
.
Lieuten g g
ant Rabbett �re ardin the traffic visibility and public safety issues.
• ' 'ion., - negotiation otiation between a property owner and an
.
Chairperson. Ledvina said ��n his opinion, it is.a g p ,.
p
• v an easement on _that property. He said hesupports the staff s
individual who wishes to have p . .
'Unfortunatelyfor the a licantit.does not, appear that the conditions for
recommendation. pp
hardship would exist in this situation.
• en ineers and the architects: should have
Board member Olson said in her opinion both. the g.
• uirement durin .the initial phases of planning. They should.
picked up on the.sign setback req g .
ese thin s should. have come up.as.the dsign bein
ewas gL' done.
have done the research and th g
• • transfer the sign setback should have been noted as well.
In the due diligence process of the g
.discussion
height ofthe sign in the previous CDRB
She also remembers the was re regarding the
• - said the,only reason the height of the sign was approved was
. meeting with Mr. Tillges. She Y
n to disc rove it. She remembered the CDRB told Mr.
because the board had no reason pp
• in the, sin ordinance again and city probably would
. Tillges the city was looking at revising g .
f a 20 -foot tall si n a ain. She thinks there needs to be a compromise
never grant approval o g g .
mailer and pushed closer to- the sidewalk.. If the sign needs
here and. the sign could be made s
main the same hei ht then it would need to -be setback.
to re g
• variance for uttin up a sign .that
member. Lon rie-Kline said we are talking about a 'putting •
.Board g property. verses granting a variance fora sign
meets-the*signage requiremenis on your own„ ,
requirements but the land is "somebody else's"'land.
..that meets the re q .
It sou
g nds. like the Maplewood
Ms. Lon rie-Kline said it is between two property owners.
r Center is willing to work with Mr. Tillges and the easement.
Cance g
• the sign so the metal caps can still be used but
Ms. Longrie-Kline said perhaps modifying g ..
• hiloso h of giving each tenant their own name on the
decrease the height. She said the p p y g 9
inion it looks more like a retail sign rather than an office sign.
sign could be changed. In her op
• location for their a ointment they will know where they
She said once a person has. found the . pp .
are going next time.
Robert Till es' request for 10 -foot sign setback
Board member Shankar moved to deny Robe g q •
• 14 -foot 8 -inch -wide b 20 -foot, 2 -inch -tall freestanding .sign up
variance in order to construct a Y
for his development at 1570 Beam Avenue. The city is
to the Beam Avenue right-of-way p
den ing s -this request because:
• � visibilit for drivers turning o.ut of
.1.
The construction of such a large sign will block traffic y
the driveway ontoBeam Avenue.
will not be compatible with the
2.. A large -,office sign constructed in this locat'oni
surrounding office signs.
• t warrant approving- the proposed
There are no unique
hardships or circumstances. that
3. q
10 -foot sign setback variance.
Board member Olson seconded. Ayes es — Jorgenson,Ledvina,
Longrie-Kline, Olson, Shankar
The motion carried.
' cit council Monday, January 27. , 2003.
..This item goes to the y Y
AGENDA ITEM NQO--..
Memorandum Action by Council
To.. Bruce Anderson Date----
From: Pauline Staples Endorsed
p
Re: Bids for Map Y Maplewood Cit Newsletters Modified
ow
Date: 1-8-2003 Rejected J
A
Sealed bids were received and opened in the Maplewood City Council Chambers on
January 8, 2002, at 2:00 pm. Heidi Hersom was the witness for the opening and
reading of the bids.
Axis Digital $58,410.94 5% bid bond received
I magewerks $65,814.00 5% bid bond received
Graphic Options No bid received in envelop
Nystrom Publishing, Inc. $54,047.00 5% bid bond received
The 2003 budget request was $52,800.00. The lowest bid is over this cost by
$1247.00.
Recommendation:
It is my recommendation to accept the bid from Nystrom Publishing for the total of
$54,047.00 and request a budget adjustment of $1,247.00 to cover this fee.
MEMORANDUM
1.
TO: City Manager
FROM:. Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Highwood Farm Preliminary Plat
LOCATION: South .of Highwood Avenue, east of Dennis Street
DATE: January 15, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
a �I
Benda #
Action by Cour-I
Date
Endorsed
Modified .
kejected
Mr. Charles Cox, representing. CEC Development, Inc., is proposing to develop a ten -lot plat for single
dwellings called Highwood Farm. It would be on a 3.71 -acre site on the south .side of Highwood
Avenue, east of Dennis Street.
Requests
To build this project, Mr. Cox is requesting that the city approve a preliminary plat to create the new
street and the ten lots in the development: In addition, city staff is proposing to change thezoning for
the site from F (farm residence) to R-1 (single dwellings).
BAC KG RO U N D
On September.23, 2002, the city council held a public hearing about the proposed 10 -lot subdivision
for this. site. (See the proposed plat on page 5.) After taking public testimony about the proposal, the
applicant agreed to a time extension for council action on the proposal. This time extension was to
allow him time to study other options for the property, including the idea of putting town houses near
Highwood Avenue and leaving the southern end of the property untouched.
On October 28, 2002, the city council again considered development options for this site. These
included the proposed 1.0 -lot single-family subdivision and a concept plan that showed 15 to 22 town
houses on the site. The applicants agreed to another time extension for council action until November
25, 2002, to allow them time to further develop the plans for town houses -on the property.
On November 25, 2002, the council again tabled action on the developer's original request for a
single-family subdivision for the property while they .continue to work on alternative plans for the site.
On December 9, 2002, the city council tabled action on the proposed plat until January 27, 2003, at
the request of .Mr. Cox, the developer.
DISCUSSION .
Since the December. 9, 20027 council meeting, the applicant has submitted new development plans
. p
for 1.8 town houses on. the property. The planning commission will be reviewing this request on
January 22, 2003 and the- city council. should be able to" act on the town house request on February
10, 2003.
Because of the time constraints and the new development applications and plans, the city should
again delay taking action on their original development application (the 10 -lot subdivision). This
tabling would be until such time as the city can act on the applicant's revised -plans for the site (the
18 -unit town house proposal).
ALTERNATIVES
1. Approve the proposed 1.0 -lot preliminary plat as requested by the developer and the zoning
:map change as requested by city staff.
2. Approve a revised preliminary plat for the site and the zoning map change.
3... Deny the proposed 1 Not preliminary plat and' zoning map change.. If the council chooses to
deny the plat, the council should direct the city attorney to prepare findings of fact for such.
4. Table taking action on the applications (as requested by the applicant).
Preliminary Plat (Original' Proposal)
The development of this site into anything more than .its current use of a house and accessory -
buildings will be a challenge. The site has several existing conditions that make the development of
this property difficult. These. limiting factors include the shape of the property (173. feet wide by 1,10.0
feet deep), its one access point (on Highwood Avenue) along with its characteristic of generally
sloping from west to east. With the existing conditions on the property, there are not many options for
designing a subdivision to fit the site. The proposed preliminaryplat, with its street and lot design,
.raised many issues for the city and for the neighbors.
The. council should again table action on the 1 Not subdivision proposal, as requested by the
applicant. This will allow for enough time for the applicant's revised plans for the property, (the 18 -unit
town house project) to proceed through the city review process.
RECOMMENDATION
Table action on the proposed Highwood Farms preliminary plat until February 10, 2003 to allow the
city time to process and act on the applicants request for 18 town houses on the site.
Kr/h.ighwood farms 5.doc
Attachments:
1._ Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Proposed Highwood Farm Preliminary Plat
2
16
1. HWNTINGTON GT.
Z. OAKRIDGE W.
72 -OS
o0
a
1.7 TIMBER rn.
rN
PHYUS CT. .
1. CURRIE CT. vAII.EY
2. VALLEY VIEW CT. 3
30LNCEW000 CT. �-.. AV, <
9 6�S
in
2.
- i
MAMIE AV
0
sin
AW.
1-8 �,�
arc wacHrs cr.
JMWOR �
SN
12
oos � eoxw000
AVE. �
0
19, ovERLoo
C1R.
1440S
20
W
in
LOCATION, MAP,
3
Attachnent 1
NrnEw
MST
R RIDGE �
m
r
z
�o
w�
�z
<- r
:E:
011)
Q
,• J 7.. 3 I _ OUT L07
S
6y � V D-
(44) i70�
z •
��, nn11'/
iZ 2 $
X40 60
AVE 140 2 Q2
H'LT.dCI'iien 4
t.•i I Z J L! • I L. ,% A A
30 ,
t • 9 Zae.• b
ozo _•
o -
<l< z
.75v
O
X07 --
D
• - 4 1l1
CO N
7
^ Q uT Lo T A z.�7d. ►
o. �. (
9. IA l3 Z I �` `,f68 _ 4+
o
►43.� �E r �` �! crag) S G 4Q a .
W 2
te. s iso. i 10 AI.
10 •' �► W
p Y
2-•z Lu
N °
w -
' r • r .'�9• t �i s '.�i HIGH - '
= - WOOD AVENUE - 6S - --�-� ■ t - - 0.
(00 14.0 + ' .t35 lrt 49• .63 goo .' "'oi -- r 6 140' 157 -- Q
(4) '��1 Z
966. Zsss : 2692 - ° .2714 1 .2730 uu -
h (21) h 2660 tit } y U
4.0 - - r
N i. /
o°in7
2 (fit a W�Cs� Zia. 99.82 Z� D
r � -
J 40 39 cr —
i¢a C - --
Q P 978 a� , • ��,�
I r► N 1 1
3 Om Q •9 ��� 3 ,n I� 3 ` ` 8Z „
�- , 5�. _ �, CARVER REPAIR
14O Z 14 c 4o j . o SIl'E R, CA
140' -:4 I
984 �► +SZ.a -a 1.0
-
,,, / l T s 153•° r 3.asae. a. ..
`; 113J m W ago ` �) 4 (41)' Q ZZ9. 18 m s ��0
140 r a �. 4 1 3 7
L'- , 994 - = ,,,.*AT ES �;♦L�s T•
(Z a 7r-
�� r 5 's f. 1 r
5�,4.0 °o' HIGH 1AD '"01004 y. _ •"'
• r40
5`
ro (r-T)0(43)�o on � � fes, : x:' , •s,: �y�R _ ... _ .., �,
a 3a r a>` S 5z q x 4 L
• a . G 1012-
1-(49)
0121'(49) W81.83 q• 7(
' 350.84'
((,o) Zvi '4 80 loo 1018 - w — •
(/� ' •A
m �] (rw (4q) c �� 2 138-0
W 2 .. m 9 8 _ Z
.� �` (47) -(4b) ' T4s) W �.. _ 1 �'o - ` - -
(Q 9 ; o 1024 C3 .. ■
MO
139.0 As I
A4rr
AVEC NEMITZv1 �: 1a. i�. 9 "
!'0• r - • 1030 - • � -
ti Io
Icr (4`) 2y ,C ) , ( 48) ( 49) J 103 s 2: - - — - - - - - f� _
1 Z r oo a s,LF
,f � 11 �14,� • w
9 m . 1p
3 � �a o u.
(50) -1.
qo- a cn 5 �'` •ca a` (� . / 4'`y //S zc ,tet ��
_ o0
1050 g
n °I ti� �_ -
0. ) �g5) 90.0 O' �Q _ __ _ _ _ - (� r3
eF
p ,
J -Ti.
°► ° q 13
•io
-
Av 1-060
CQUHG RST 5 �Z3.21 - 'S �'V # _ _/ _ ._ •s► •
123.1 - . c� ,.c• � _ - _ _..,.. ".— - .
cA.95 I 1068-
K
PROPERTY. LINE /ZONING MAP
4
I-
Attarhmpnt -4:.
-- ..— '----- Tm------�"----------------------aC.r..
-- +_ HIGHWOOD AVENUE
-�.
i 123-01
-- — — -- -- _-J —7f�-
°�----1--Lil
-- --- 1
07R/W � - � Ig :� •
r- a 2692
L_ _«.�_ _ � 2684
ni
b
Oti6
*fid' , � ,� ♦ ` /.
h
yw
173.01 — �V
N' 88'35'38' E
z
n
= n
h D
O m
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Subject to State Highway 100/117 and 393, The North 1100 feet of the
West 173 feet of the West half of. the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, Section 13, Township 28, Range 22.
• ham
Gras ratM Amo 00.312 Sq. Ft/4.37 Aerw
Nplwir- Am E *w -41e= Sp, st, .0 Aenr
Not TOW M90-01.946 4 :LAW Amm
Berklwnork
rap Nrt Nr OW At W Q O&VAt Nw CrMry mW P99A Arm. E
ad -NofoCmm (Par «f of Dab")
PROPOSED -PRELIMINARY PLAT
P' , RELIMINARY PLAT: HUGHWOOD FARM
' 5 .
e
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
TO: Richard. Fursman, City Manager bate
Endorsed
FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public g
.Works/City Engineer Modified
Rejected
SUBJECT: NPDES Storm Water Permit, City Project -02-22 -- Authorize Preparation of Permit
Application and Direct Investigation of Environmental/Surface Water Utility
DATE: January 21, 2003
Introduction
The 2003 budget included an appropriation for services to implement app
p ermit . application to meet federal
requirements for storm water management. Authorization to prepare the permit application is
recommended, along with an investigation into an Environmental/Surface Water Utility chproperty
ar e to
9 p Y
owners as a permanent dedicated funding source to meet the permit requirements.
Background
The Federal Clean Water Act of 1991 required that all discharges of storm water acquire a Nationwide
Pollution Discharge Elimination Source (NPDES) permit. The act required all cities that exceed 100,000
in population to acquire their permits within seven years, while cities in excess of 10,000 persons Phase
II .cities) were given 12 years. The . NPDES process in Minnesota will be. administered by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA has established March 10, 2003, as the date that Phase II
cities must submit a Notice of Intent for the permit application and a five-year Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan. Unfortunately, the MPCA has only provided limited guidance on the permit
:_requirements, other than to remain firm on the specific submittal dates. The League of Minnesota Cities
(LMC) started a process in October 2,002 with 73 communities (mainly cities) to develop a guide plan that.
assists cities in their application. The city council approved a joint powers agreement with LMC in
October 2002 that begins the permit application process. The next step of the process is to prepare the
actual notice of intent (NOI).with specific storm water activities documented that the City. of Maplewood
will implement to meet the Clean Water Act requirements. The expertise of a consultant is required to
finalize the permit application. A budget of $60,000 is recommended.
Additional expenses are likely to meet the permit requirements. The additional tasks will include amore
;extensive maintenance of the storm water/surface" water. system, additional environmental features to
treat surface water runoff prior to discharge, a more comprehensive street sweeping program and an
educational component for public involvement in surface water management. Each of these tasks will
require additional public funding. A dedicated source of funding that many surrounding communities
(Roseville, Oakdale, N. St. Paul, St. Paul, Woodbury, Shoreview, etc.) have implemented is a utility
charge to property owners, called a storm water or environmental/surface water utility charge. This
system administers the charge, similar to the sanitary sewer utility, to each property. A single family
home is typically the base charge and rates vary fron,$2 per quarter to $ i o per quarter throughout the
metro area. Authorization to explore this option of funding is recommended.
Recommendation
Itis recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to select a consultant for the
preparation of the permit application for the NPDES Phase 11 Stormwater Permit; authorize
transfer of $60,000 from the Public Works Budget to the project fund; and direct the investigation
into an Environmental/Surface Water Utility as a dedicated funding source for the permit
requirements.
RCA
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT fiction by Council
Date
rV
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager nd
� orsed
Modified
FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Refected
SUBJECT: County Road D Extension (Hazelwood to TH 61) — City. Project 02-07
County Road D Extension- (West of TH 61) —City Project 02-08
Resolution Receiving, Environmental Assessment Worksheet and Authorizing
Distribution of EAW for Public Review
DATE: January 21, 2003
Introduction
The Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the County Road Drealignment- project
between Hazelwood and TH 61 and the realignment of County Road D west of TH 61 has been
completed. The next phase of consideration of the impacts of the project is to publish notice that the
document is complete and to receive comment. Approval to distribute the document is recommended.
Background
On December 9, 2002, the city council approved a resolution to proceed with a, project to realign
County Road. D from Hazelwood Street to TH 61 at the Venburg. Tire intersection and then realign
County Road D west of TH 61 through the vacant property to the existing alignment on the east side of
the Highridge Court development. The length of this new roadway met the threshold for preparation of
an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), which has been prepared by the consultant for the
project, URS,, Inc. A copy of the EAW will be provided to each council member at the pre -agenda.
meeting. This step in the process does not anticipate council approval of the document, only that the
council approves the document. to be routed to the various agencies and be provided for public
comment.
The draft EAW identifies potential for environmental impacts. Specific impacts are to wetlands, where
2.43 acres will be impacted but, are proposed to be replaced by 4.86 acres of wetlands to be created
by restoring a portion of the golf course and by expanding wetlands at the County Road D and.
Hazelwood intersection. A major grading operation will be required at the Burlington Northern Railroad
Crossing, which will impact area slopes. Appropg priate construction controls should mitigate this impact.
Blandings turtle and White Wild Indigo are threatened species within the area; however, the DNR has
concluded that the project likely will have no impact. Sediment ponds are proposed to upgrade the
area storm water flows, which are currently untreated. Standards for the 1.44 acres of storm ponds to
be created include providing for 60% phosphorus and 90% total suspend solid* removal for runoff flows
generated within the project area.
A 30 -day comment period is required as part of the review process for an EAW. The EAW will be -
made available to review agencies, area communities, and the public. It will be posted on the city's
website and available for inspection at City Hall -and at the local library. It is anticipated that final
review of the EAW will occur in March 2003. No approvals of projects, right of way mapping, or final
alignment consideration can occur until the EAW process is completed.
iF
City Council Agenda Report
January21, 2003
County Road D Realignment EAW
Page Two
Process
Consideration of the alignment'is.part of a process to implement the findings..
of the Mall Traffic Study..
Y
The City of Maplewood has established a goal of opening the County Road D extension project for
traffic by November 2004. The following process is provided for consideration:
• Planning Commission. Review of Alignment Study
• Council Public Hearing on Alignment Study
• EAW Approved for New Roadway in coordination with AUAR
• Feasibility Study and Right of Way Map Approved
Public Hearing on Improvements
• Right of Way Acquisition/Plan Preparation
• Assessment Hearing/Plan Approval
Construction Award (Hazelwood to TH 61)
• Begin. Construction (Hazelwood to TH 61)
• Complete Construction (Hazelwood- to TH 61)
Assessment Hearing/Plan Approval (west of TH 61)
Construction Award (west.6f TH 61)
• Begin Construction (west of TH 61)
Complete Construction (west of TH 61)
Recommendation
December 3, 2002
December 9, 2002
March 24, 2003
March 24, 2003
March 24, 2003
Mar. Sept. 2003
September 27, 2003
October 25, 2003
November 2003
November 2004
September 2004
February 2005
April 2005
September 2005
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution that authorizes
distribution of the EAW for the County Road D Realignment Project (City Projects 02-07 and 02-
08) according to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution Fist and establishes a 30
day comment period.
RCA
jw
Attachments: County Road D Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. XX -XX
A RESOLUTION TO ORDER DISTRIBUTION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET (EAW) FOR THE COUNTY ROAD D REALIGNMENT PROJECT (CITY.
PROJECTS 02-07 AND 02-08) IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD.
WHEREAS, on December 09, 2002, the Maplewood City Council authorized preparation of an EAW
for the County Road D Realignment Project (City Projects 02-07 and 02-08); and
WHEREAS, the. firm of URS, Inc: has prepared a' draft EAW for the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, the City is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU)pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part
.4410.3610 Subp. 1; and
WHEREAS; the City Council has reviewed the draft EAW and finds it to be in acceptable order
designating the impacts of the proposed improvement and now desires to receive all comments and
reviews related to the environmental impacts..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUCIL. OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD -IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the City Council hereby adopts is the
following:
1: An order authorizing distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet, in
accordance with Minnesota Rules Part. 4410.3610, for an environmental analysis for the
County Road D Realignment Project (City Projects 02-07 and 02-08), with a. minimum of
30 day comment period.
Passed and adopted _this day of 2003
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Richard Fursman, City Manager Date
Endorsed
Charles Ahl,. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Modified
Rejected
Count1.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT lotion by Council I.,
y Road B Street Light Request (West of Mississippi St.) — Review Request -fir
Street Light Installation
DATE: January 21,. 2003
Introduction
Attached is a resident's request for streetlights along County Road B in the northwest corner of
Maplewood.. There are no intersections in this area and this does not meet the city's criteria for
installation of streetlights. Review of the request is recommended.
Background
The city council maintains a budget within the Public Works Department for streetlights within the
community. Past criteria for installation of streetlights within the city has been that the taxpayers pay
for lighting at all major intersections. County Road B from Edgerton to Rice is consistent with this
criterion, although there is lighting at private driveways for the school and Cub Foods that.was paid for
by the property owners. City -installed lights exist at the intersections. of public streets from Mississippi
to Edgerton.
The property owner is requesting a revision from this criterion due to the dark situation that exists
along County Road B in front of their newly constructed home at 170 East County Road B. The 2003
budget did not anticipate the installation of any new intersection lighting so capital funding is not
available. The estimated cost of the 3-5 lights that would be required along this area is $3,500 to -
$6,000.
o$6,000. A transfer from the. contingency fund would be necessary if the city council would like to meet
this request..
The city staff does not recommend that the city council revise the. criteria that taxpayers fund
streetlights only at major intersections. The impact citywide. of amid -block street lighting would be
significant. Staff recommends- that the city council, deny this request and suggest that the property
owners in this area would likely have cheaper options to install yard lighting to meet their needs'.
Further alternatives are available to the property owner to have the lighting' installed. by the city and
assessed to their property through a public hearing process. This alternative is time consuming and
would be more expensive than the yard -lighting option.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council deny the request for street lighting along County Road
B from the railroad tracks to Mississippi Street based upon the city's standing criteria to fund
street lights at major intersections only and direct the public works department to inform the
property owners of the policy and recommend yard -lighting options.
RCA
Attachments: Site Map
Letter. from 170 East County Road B
y; ......... _...... ,-..... .».....«.._».............. ................
' 19TH f; i i►: ! '•
• i j
• j _....._ _.....:.. .._.. j : � ly>n ,...,....: IIi :7.0:.9 '.+ .:.iia s....:.u:F ! F ii
... it J•'
f
i t 19 .._..... �I Isf7^11� : len
Im70 ....::....
8'
5
{ ! i
:.
f.
I
{ 1062 F _...
116... IRS .X71 !n i lee 127
{ tan «I
j .....
...._.._..�..................«` ..».........._.
i ;196e ! i � i •'t
199
...» ...._...... j........... ...... _...... ^................................................
;.
j j OeweM!
AWE
F
4 .................... ............................. •• ............._ _.. ..................... "......................• ' ....... ._.-.. ».«« ....... ....... i , :119 ! j
19N•, { ., i a i ••160 1 `let' { !i t .ply :1'161 i 1M-e3.Nt : `..19i1 �.i9�t ..._...i
1111 i { i910i 1 ,[y2•• i 120` 1!e •f Y } 1!t' f � + ,
4; .�•_ i 704
{ :
« {
• i ,
F••
i
t
i 1 f
O
i
,
I i
I Ii•
:..........._... ._............._.....: ..............:....,, 121 + 129 (76 }::...ily .. i61:- •.....101':•.. ;. ..Iba.::.�::.:•T11 ......
1�..... ..196"" 197.....• 19]1....:
� � ... �...
sd m:.��ss^.'x 'i&�'�;�%d wig z' s< res ss• c z». z +a x<: - m yr •i+' Us .r .c a x •c:• x ,�. Urr - x.s�3.=+W s'. r
�r iaLl`aSKxr�ti�(ftC411A4ir��1I1DYl�i0n�2/ri►O%►Otl �IIIQf�;f111191F31iQ� �
..y 'v+ 4 'T
lwl>�d1�a�la++[aoeia,a►%rt£airth±r�ll�vmWscb�rr.cltbyrrCp�+anrt,car.��lndp��rol�ls�.a
�„ H 7$istic nduaRilrstgp9►8atakln9rai�itynhiah;ilhSr�!*Wt7iaF�llyonpolii�jilrhnliip,prb�ii�4 ,
..i.FS x s _ <-o ss
,'. •o,xyw'j"'.>�,..:kJF".w..qa.;:'
£ 1 ���� � _ ♦
"Cat
M ►yam �f �
� �a sa ..N,
a 11bwMdlliw(tliMq� iz 2
'alAt4c/R� �f��! .S+" ai�'�I��id�tl�...
%_. ... . ��01k1R a9rMM �Ww.,ry r,M►Mk 3� .- Yz c s. a< Tim u . s
.; F[�s . �: . - - � •, a.1w�MiMM�!{aiMRC1Y+�IMiINIYItfMk9w�9M (n �YMIMN iogQiBw�s��C��
�i kW19Mk�i1N►',R'4MM!'A'M�NIA�MG�1(d��14l1MfMrE'[1Ht'hlpd'� �s yY x '. �`x 1�'`w�`�"•F ��" _ ,�'� '� s
1 toglKSinelY,�MdNI
.\:. > . ? ; £ .{�.���,.�� W71; «mr►ptz: �3.<(. `x' 2r, K 5 `�C(1hiR'vcorilr&; r•°i'i"3x Kr? 2 •`�' _ $xinZ S' '�t'i xd
H..: ..._.. .. s;�a.�«w.�r�r�,.�`w �aK�caraa9t��•i>w�"�w.�f.w.l�w�r►n�w� r �, �"°;
--'rwwM1E1112iWw«.w 3www MFW a19jt0oo4w/N/uwcAtiNf►SM►6wINMIMx; y.?' xt�IMi�:.�4o!INSt"�Sd..�
�i�l.' CQii Miik�dywwltnMYttliM►>�r1Y�lnn�ywlsgl�lNwdvw�Toi�i,l�i1 ' '� is 111Ns$ESOQ��
Together iEA/Wlik'I�lii1MAM11i AP%ipifA AlMfIfl1RJIKC(YMq�MOMR11rM,iltYjiMf(.iNMVN �s xf sgtaF� 4�
.• �11191�,�4i1� 7NN�1�� `q�4� �g `3 y ,c,c
- � A?'rc. ... �t<\E��#'4��,�SS. � �?t��'z3 #4�t<.:".a :.i'.czrsc.'`i��°'..: 2£3'�`.. c:r ''..So'.�<. ».t •yr'��'�"�. .a O.ul .� ?:OiS016W wif�.,.�`g.;l. ..
www.d.Mapiewoodmn.us
170 EAST COUNTYR-E.0ROADB.ED
MAPLEWOOD, lvM 5 5117
December 31, 2002::
3
CHUCK AHL
C/O. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1830 EAST COUNTY RD B
MAPLEWOOD., MN 55109
Dear Chuck Hall
We are the residents of the new - t
ly constructed house on 170 East Count Rd. B
Street, and are kindlyrequestingy off Rice
the installation of street lightening'
in the area be
right after the railroad tracks and g tween
Mississippi street.
It is extremely dark .and 'dangerous l
. g at night, more so with the small lake behind St. Jude's
and the ditches ute road. We were informed t
. ph
hat these street lights are-installed onl
. on major intersections. This does not seem to -be- the� 'y
case on County Rd B, as street .lights
are in front of some premises or near driveways,
with no intersection close by.
Your timely intervention on .this matter'
will be highly appreciated
rs tru ,
aphn n -`�
g
mmanuel King
cc. Council members:
Ken Collins .. .... .. ..... ..... ... .
KathleenJuenemann
Marvin. Kopper
Julie Wasiluk
City Manager: Richard Fursrn
an
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Introduction
AGENDA ITEM KL4
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager
Assistant -City Engineer
Parkway Lift Station Removal, Project 02-14
Resolution Accepting Report and Calling for Public Hearing
January 21, 2003
Action by Council
r
Date .��.....
Endorsed
Modified -
Rejected
The feasibility study for the Parkway Lift Station Removal is complete and isavailable for review in the
office of the city engineer: Final copies of the study will be made available to the city council prior to
the public hearing. The study includes information on the proposed improvements, proposed
financing and probable assessments. Attached is an executive summary of the study.
The city council will consider accepting _the feasibility study and ordering a public hearing
Background
The proposed project area is illustrated on the attached project location map
The. proposed project will include sanitary sewer and street improvements as outlined below:
• Removal of an existing City. of St. Paul sanitary sewer lift station.
• Installation of a new gravity sanitary sewer main along Larpenteur Avenue from. Parkway
Drive to an existing MCES interceptor in the Phalen golf course.
• Reconstruction of a poorly degraded Larpenteur Avenue between Parkway Drive and Arcade
Street.
Maplewood contributes the largest share of flow and maintenance expense to this facility. With the
development of the Carriage Homes of. Maple Hills,, Maplewood would expect to contribute even more
flow and expense to the existing lift station. For this reason, Maplewood staff recommended that
Maplewood be the lead agency for this. project.
No neighborhood meeting has been held for this project. Due to an extremely small number of
property owners along the project, Maplewood and St. Paul staff decided that it would be more
effective to send out an informational letter to the property owners and request that they call or meet
individually with staff at their convenience.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution accepting. the report
and calling for a public hearing for 7:00 pm, Monday, February 1.0, 2003, for the. Parkway Lift
Station Removal, Project, 02-14.
CMC
JW
Attachment: Location Map
Executive Summary
Resolution
Dix.
BEAM AVE.
0
Q W kO�LMq�
Q). °' o
Gervais
UJ Lake
PALM N
CT. PALM C1R
CONNOR C��OR
AVE
CT.
0EM4N� .
W
BROOKS
PROJECT CT.
' O
LOCATION
Poo pkW 1'
Lake
LITTLE CANADA
IG�WA DR.
VIKING Kellet
LARK AVE. r
v~i > v W Lake /
LAUR IE RD. �� CL w Q o v 1
r '' } 0 LAURIE CT.
CA (n V) J� (n CL W i
V1 G� O Y
COUNTY R0, g • .+ �; COUNTY R0. B BURKE AV
N Cn aplecreic
0
ELD RIDGE
= AV E. p �ELORIOGE A •
.�.�• Sandy ��. ; � � � Cr. � '
lake '! 0BELMONT LN. 0 Lake a BELMONT CN
�' `• ` •' ` :�" N SKILLMAN AVE. W I /� SKILLMAN AV.
:• KENW 000
SKILLMAN AVE. N rn cr.� W lv LN.
' 1 �yMT. VERNON ca. Z
W KJ Rte:. _ m in M
W W
DOWNS AVE. O o MT: VERNON AV }
Edgwtoff
—�! ��:.•' !- � � W Roaelown Pork
N ¢ ' Pork ROSELAWN
LaiZ 0ELLWOOD AVE.
(� Y eELt_woo0 AVE. BELL woo 000
AVE.AvEc
O L �. SUMMER AVE. N. o SUMMER WR cri 0
c4l W� � 7 W ° Z 113
Kimley-Horn. CITY.OF MAPLEW-0-OD LOCATION MAP
and Associates, Inc. PARKWAY LIFT STATION REMOVAL
SL PUniversity. 5114 W., Sults 345N Fox No..Nw) 645-5196 CITY PROJECT 02-14 EXHIBIT I
PENTON AVE.
a
N v .4
Z
Z
U
Y �+' z
°o Y
Western
2 (n
ipm
W
*Az) 141716 141716N
AVE..
►-=
o
RIPLEY
AVE. Y
�'
V~1 N t/1
=
N
F—
f..
N
W O
.KINGSTON z
Q�
i-.
_
m
KINGSTON¢AVE.
'
Round
�Lake�
a
Z >
Z
Q
pt��'
i
aa
40
0. AVE.
W
W
N N
RI
P CE
WAVE. .. ....
z.
\`-_
}
Cr.
W
a3
�dd
J
W
Y .14:'
Q
(n
a
W
m
LARPE
NTEUR
0
W
_
a AVE.----
---------------
SAINT S
PA UL
Kimley-Horn. CITY.OF MAPLEW-0-OD LOCATION MAP
and Associates, Inc. PARKWAY LIFT STATION REMOVAL
SL PUniversity. 5114 W., Sults 345N Fox No..Nw) 645-5196 CITY PROJECT 02-14 EXHIBIT I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PARKWAY LIFT STATION REMOVAL IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT 02-14
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Feasibility Study and Report has been prepared for the Parkway Lift Station
Removal Improvements, City Project 02-14. The proposed project includes the removal
of an existing ' City of St. Paul sanitary sewer lift station located at Parkway Drive and
Larpenteur Avenue; the installation of new gravity sanitary sewer main from the lift
station location to an existing Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES)
interceptor sanitary sewer main; the replacement of existing watermain along Larpenteur
Avenue; and the reconstruction of Larpenteur Avenue between Parkway Drive and .
Arcade Street.
The estimated costs for the proposed improvements are detailed below. These costs
include a 10% construction cost contingency and a 31.5 % allowance for indirect costs.
Proposed Improvement
Estimated Cost
Street Improvements
$
137,050
Storm Sewer Improvements
$
35,060
Sanitary Sewer Improvements
$
..4185390
Watermain Improvements (Excavation Only)
$
18,300
Total Project Cost
$
6081800
The improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination of special
assessments to benefiting properties, Maplewood funds, 'St. Paul funds and St. Paul
Regional. Water Services funds. The following is a summary of the estimated .funding
. g
amounts from each of the proposed financing sources:
Financing Source Amount
Assessments (Maplewood) $ 24,280
Maplewood Sewer Utility Fund $ 321,180
City of .St. Paul Funds . $ 2459040
St. Paul Regional Water Services $ 18,300
Total. $ 60800
The following is a proposed schedule for the proj ect if the City Council votes to proceed.
Public Hearing/Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specs February 10, 2003
Approve Plans and Specifications March 24, 2003
Bid Opening April 18,-2003
Assessment Hearing/Award Contract April 28,'2003
Construction Start May 12, 2003
Construction Complete August 29, 2003
Based upon the analysis completed as a part. of this report, the proposed Parkway Lift
Station Removal Improvements, City Project 02-14 are feasible, necessary and cost
effective and would .benefit both the City of Maplewood and the City of St. Paul.
i
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the' council adopted July 22, 2002,'a report
has-been prepared by the city engineering division with reference to the improvement of
Parkway Lift Station Removal, City Project 02-14, and this 'report was received by the
council on January.27, 2003, and
WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed
project is� necessary, .cost-effective, and feasible,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of
the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 -at an estimated total
cost of the. improvement of $608,800.
.2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 10th
day of February 2003 in the council chambers- of city hall- at 7 p.m.,'and the clerk shall
give mailed and, published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law.
Agenda # . �.
MEMORANDUM Action by Council
TO: City.Manager
FROM:. Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Date
SUBJECT:. Planning Commission's 2002 Annual Report Endorsed
DATE: January. 15, 2003 Modified
Rejected a
INTRODUCTION
The city code requires that the planning commission prepare an annual report. to the city council by
their second meeting in February. This report should include the planning commission's activities from
the past year and the major projects for the new- year.
The planning commission recommended approval of this report on January 6, 2003..
ACTIVITIES
The commission considered th:e following in:
2,002 2001 2000 1999
changes to the land use plan. .3 3 5 7
changes to the zoning map 2 .2 2 1
preliminary plats 6 3 6 2
ordinance changes .3 5 3 2
conditional .use permits and revisions 18 25 .21 21
vacations 5 7 0, v 5
variances 1 2 7 3
miscellaneous requests and presentations 17 .. - 7 6 11
In 2002, the commission also finished work on the comprehensive plan update, initiated the south
Maplewood study' and took a .tour of development sites. In addition to these, the planning commission
had. a goal -setting session with the city council, considered the manufactured home park closing
ordinance, had a training. session with Barb Strandell, had -a presentation about rainwater gardens
and reviewed the proposed extension of County Road D.
NOTE: For all the items listed below, the planning commission recommended approval ayes all,
unless I have noted otherwise.
2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGES
The commission Considered three changes to the comprehensive pian in 2002..
Changes PC Action Council Action
Mall Area Traffic S#udy Approved Approved
Gladstone Park Addition _ Approved Approved
(Burke Avenue at English Street)
From P (park) to R-1 (single-family
residential)
This change was for a seven -lot subdivision that .the city built as part of the- English Street
improvement project.
Dearborn Meadow Approved
Approved
(Castle Avenue)
From M-1 (light manufacturing) to R -3(M)
(medium -density residential)
This change was -for anine-unit town house development on the south side
of Castle Avenue.
2002 ZONING MAP CHANGES
The commission considered two changes to the zoning map in 2002.
Change PC Action
Council Action
Anderson Hillwood Oaks Approved
Approved
(Mailand and Dorland Roads)
From F (farm residence) to
R-1 (single -'family residential)
This change was for afour-lot single-family subdivision.
Hicahwood Farm Approved
Pending.
(Highwood Avenue)
From F (farm. residence) to
R-1 (single-family residential)
This change was for a proposed 10 -lot single-family subdivison.
2002 CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND REVISIONS
The commission considered the following conditional use permits and permit revisions in 2002:
PC Action
Council Action
Carnage Homes of Maple Hills PUD Approved
Approved
(Parkway.Drive) .(5-3)
Maplewood Toyota Expansion Approved
Approved
(2783 Highway 61)
St. Jerome's CUP Revision Approved
Approved
(380 Roselawn Avenue)
Hillcrest Animal Hospital Approved
Approved
(1320 County Road D)
Beaver Lake Townhvmes PUD Approved
Approved
(Lakewood Drive and Maryland Avenues (5-1)
Oversized Accessory Building Approved
Approved
(1481 Henry Lane)
Kline Nissan Dealership _
Approved
(3100 Maplewood Drive)
Dearborn Meadow PUD
Approved.
(Castle avenue)
Lexus Dealership Expansion
Approved
(3000 Maplewood Drive)
Hmong Alliance Church
Approved
J1.770 McMenemy Street)
(6-1)
Sinclair Fuel Station Remodeling
Approved
(223 Larpenteur Avenue)
Bruentrup Farm CUP Revision
Approved
(2170 County Road D)
Keller Golf Course Maintenance Building
Approved
(21.66 Maplewood Drive)
Oversized Accessory Building
Approved
(1-501 Henry Lane)
Budget Towing
Approved
(1291 Frost Avenue)
Quality Restoration CUP Revision
Approved
(1160 Frost Avenue)
Jiffy Lube
Approved_
(Maplewood Mall. Ring Road)
Maplewood Imports Storage Yard
Approved
(Gervais Avenue)
OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST
County Road D Extension
Denied
(2-4)
MEMBER WHO RESIGNED IN 2002
Eric Ahlness
MEMBERS WHO WERE APPOINTED IN 2002
Jackie Monahan-Junek, Tusher Desai
3
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved.
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved .
Withdrawn
2002 ATTENDANCE
Name Appointed Term ' Expires 2002 Attendance
Lorraine Fischer 1970. 12-041, 14 out of 17
Jackie Monahan-Junek 3-11-02 12-02 8 out of 10
Gary Pearson 12-10-90 12-02 15 out of 17 '
William Rossbach 10-10-89 12-02 .16 out of 17.
Tushar. Desai 7-22-02 12-04 6 out of 6
Matt Ledvina 12-08-97 12-04 12.out of 17
Dale Trippler ' 6-08-98 12-03 15 out of 17,
Paul Mueller 7-13-98 12-03 12 out of 17
Mary Dierich 12-11-00 12-03. 15 out of 17
-As a point of comparison, the planning commission had 17 meetings in 1999,18 meetings in 2000 and
18 meetings in 2001.
2003 ACTIVITIES
The following are the .possible activities of the planning. commission for. 2003:
1. Have an annual tour of development and other sites of interest, including Arbor Lakes . in Maple
Grove.
2. Have quarterly .in-service training sessions or. materials for the planning commission. This might
include training or information to help prepare the commission for the review of the - Hajicek -
property development plans, for the south Maplewood study or have a session about septic
systems and/or wells.
3: Work with the ,consultants and city staff on any code or land use plan changes that result from the
Hillcrest and Gladstone Area studies..
4. Work with staff on the south Maplewood. study. _
5. Review the SPUD ordinance for possible changes.
6: Provide input to the HRA on housing redevelopment and program issues.
7: Study the. area west of Maplewood Mail (including the Hajicek property) for land use and
transportation issues.
P:1..lmisce[IXPC 2002annrep.doc
A
4
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST,. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2003
bm 2002 Planning Commission Annual -Report
Mr. Roberts reviewed the 2002 Planning Commission Annual Report -with the. planning
commission.
Commissioner Dierich would like the commission to have an .in-service on septic systems and
wells.
Commissioner Pearson would like information on current drainfields in the south of Maplewood,
what is their average life, if there are failed systems are -they using.,septic tanks as a holding tank
and what is the proper size fora tank based on the square footage of a home? He also would like
to know if there is much of a variation in the perk tests from one area to. the other in south
Maplewood.
Commissioner Trippler said he wanted to see the votes under the pc action .and council action to
see a comparison.. He said that .request was made last year and it still wasn't in the report.this
.year..
Commissioner Pearson asked staff if Ahere had been any feedback recent from the meeting with
Barb Strandel?
Mr. Roberts said he has not heard any recent feedback but he -believes commission members are. -
now working well together.
Mr. Roberts said he would make the changes that were discussed for the 2002 Planning
.Commission Annual Report -and it. will - be sent to the city council for the _Monday,. January 27,
2003, meeting.
Commissioner Ledvina moved to approve the 2002 Planning Commission Annual Report with the
proposed changes. -
Commissioner Pearson. seconded. Ayes Desai, Dierich, Fischer, Ledvina,
Monahan-Junek, Mueller, Pearson,
Rossbach, Trippler
Commissioner Mueller made a motion to reopen. discussion for the 2002 Planning Commission
Annual. Report.
Commissioner Monahan-Junek suggested a friendly amendment to add the Manufactured Home
:Park Closing Ordinance as a review item. to the 2002 Annual Report .as a small paragraph under.
the list of activities.
Mr. Roberts said he would insert a small paragraph as requested by Commissioner.. Monahan-
Junek.
Commissioner Monahan-Junek Ayes — Desai, Dierich, Fischer., Ledvina,
Monahan-Junek, Mueller; Pearson,
Rossbach, Trippler
The motion passed..
This item goes to the city council* on Monday, January 27, 2003.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: January 8, 2003
RE: 2003 City Council Appointments
Introduction
Agenda # �6
Action by Council
Date....
M0difi ,d
Rejected
At its first meeting of the year the Maplewood City Council officially makes the year's
appointments to organizations of which the City is a member and to those who serve at the
pleasure of the Council. With the absence of Councilmember Collins at the first meeting, the
following appointment list, with incumbents and vacancies, is provided to the City Council for
consideration at its January 27, 2003 regular council meeting.
Appointment
2002
City Attorney Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly &Fawcett
Current Rates: $80/hr -civil
$95/hr -litigation
Prosecuting Attorney Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly & Fawcett
Current Rates: $9,825/monthly retainer
$ 500/month cap on expenses
Official Newspaper
Maplewood Review
Municipal Legislative Commission Kathy Juenemann
(quarterly, Wed - p.m.) City Manager
Ramsey County League Kathy Juenemann
of Local Governments Kenneth Collins
Ramsey/Washington Kim Facile
Suburban Cable Commission Robert Cardinal (alt)
2003 Recommended
Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly & Fawcett
Patrick J. Kelly
Kelly & Fawcett
Maplewood Review
N.E.S.T
Marvin Koppen
(first Thursday @ 7:30 p.m.)
Julie Wasiluk
Suburban Rate Authority
Ken Collins
(first month of quarter)
Melinda Coleman
St. Paul Water Utility
Robert Cardinal
Board of Commissioners
(second Monday @ 5:00 p.m.)
Suburban Area Chamber
Kenneth Collins
of Commerce
Melinda Coleman (alt)
The Partnership Julie Wasiluk
(Tuesday a.m.) Kevin Rabbett
Metro East Development Marvin Koppen
Partnership Melinda Coleman (alt)
Joint Ice Arena Board Bruce Anderson
Kenneth Collins
Rush Line Corridor Ken Collins
Chuck Ahl
Acting Mayor* Julie Wasiluk
Ken Collins
*Rotation of acting mayors: 1995 -Carlson, 1996 Allenspach, 1997-Koppen, 1998-Rossbach,
1999 -Carlson, 2000 Allenspach, 2001-Koppen, 2002 Julie Wasiluk
Attachment # 1 Suburban Cable Commission Information
Together We Can
PLEASE POST!,
CITY OF "LEWOOD
RAMSEY WASHINGTON SUBURBAN
CABLE COMMISSION
VACANCY
The City of Maplewood has an opening on the Ramsey -
Washington Suburban Cable Commission. This
Commission oversees the operation and activities of cable
communications and the cable system of member cities and
townships. Additionally, the Commission assists citizens in
resolving cable -related issues and complaints regarding the
cable television company and its services. This is an annual
(calendar year) appointment.
Interested Maplewood residents can call (651) 770-4500 for
an application. Applications are due' to the City Manager's
Office by April. 2 6, 2 002.
This vacancy expires December 2004.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MN 55109
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: January 21, 2003
Agenda #
Action by Council
D,,ite��
RE: Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals - On Sale EnrJoped.
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWO
Re'ected�
OD, RAMSY
COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following- �
On Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly
issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for oneear, effective Januar 20
Y � y 03, with
approval granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police,)Fire and Health Inspections:
Jose Leon
Melvin Lindholm
Gregory Kuhns
g y
Acapulco Mexican Restaurant
Ciatti's Italian R
Restaurant
Smiley's D.G. Burger
3069 White Bear Avenue
1900 E. County Road D
2425 Highway 61
g Y
Robert James Selander
Paul J. Mateyka, Jr.
Cheri Ottem
AMF Maplewood Lanes
Deans, Inc.
Star ate Bar & Danceclub
club
1955 English Street
1986 Rice Street
1700 Rice Street
Dorothy Helen Piotrowski
Raymond R. Emerfoll
Suzanne Schilling
Applebee's Bar & Grill
Garrit 's
Y
Suzanne's Cuisine
2112 Maplewood Mall
1696 White Bear Avenue
2100 White Bear Avenue
Bernard Klarkowski
Bernard Micharel Diebel
Brian
MeyererBenni
Bennigan's
Goodrich Golf Course
The Bird
1749 Beam Avenue.
1820 N. Van Dyke
3035 White Bear Avenue
Stephen Yantes
Michael Gengler
Thomas Hecker
Bleechers
2220 White Bear Avenue
Gulden's
2999 N. Highway 61
The Olive Garden.
1749 Beam Avenue
Scott Uttley
Best Western -Maplewood Inn
Thomas Hecker
Olive Garden
Michael Paul Mira nowski
1730 E. County Road D
1749 Beam Avenue
The Rock
2029 Woodl n Avenue
enue
Bradley Karl
Patricia Belde
Club On -Sale
Chalet Lounge
1820 Rice Street
Keller Clubhouse
Loyal Order of Moose oose 963
2166 Maplewood Drive
1946 English Street
Judith Landreville
Stephen Parr
Wine On -Sale
Champp's of Maplewood
Outback Steakhouse
Balbir Singh
g
1734 Adolphus
p
1770 Beam Avenue
Taste of India
Steve Shirvinski
Ehrick Holland
1745 Cope Avenue
Chili's Bar & Grill
Red Lobster
Kin Phin Lee
Southlawn & Beam
2925 White Bear Avenueg
Singapore Chinese Cuisine
Scott Flewelling
1715-A Beam Avenue
Chipotle Mexican Grill
2303 White Bear Avenue
MEMORANDUM
TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk
DATE: January 21, 2003
RE: Intoxicating Liquor License Annual Renewals - Off Sale
Agenda # ! I
Action by Council
Date
d
Modified
Rejected
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY
COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following
Off -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly
issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 2003, with
approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and health inspections:
Todd Norman
Joseph Hudy
A-1 Liquor, Inc.
M.G.M. Liquors Warehouse
19 North Century Avenue
2950 White Bear Avenue
Arthur Mark Stein
Marvin C. Koppen
Laber's Liquors
Party Time Liquor
1700 D Rice Street
1835 E. Larpenteur Ave.
Charly Lor
Christopher Sarrack
Lor Liquor Store
Sarrack's International Wine & Spirits
1347 Frost Avenue
2305 Stillwater Road
Wendy Lauber
John Heinz
Maplewood Wine Cellar
Sid's Discount Liquor
1281 Frost Avenue
2515 White Bear Avenue