Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2004 12-13 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M. Monday, December 13, 2004 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 04-28 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Acknowledgement of Maplewood residents serving the country. C. ROLL CALL Mayor's Address on Protocol "Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. When you address the council, please state your name and address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and Council. I then will direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond to comments. " D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from the Council/Manager Workshop-November 22, 2004 2. Minutes from the City Council Meeting-November 22, 2004 3. Minutes from the Council/Manager Workshop-December 2, 2004 4. Minutes from the Special City Council Meeting-December 6, 2004 E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Environmental Committee Appointments 2. Cable Commission Report-No Report G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Assessments for Delinquent False Alarm Bills 3. Increase in Planning Fees (Second Reading) 4. Write Off Uncollectible Ambulance Bills for 2002 5. Assessments for Unpaid Ambulance Bills for 2003-2004 6. Employee Group Insurance Contracts 7. New Vehicle-Fire Department 8. Two (2) Defibrillator Monitors 9. Paid-per-call pay rate change for 2004 10. Hazelwood/County Road C Area Street Improvements, City Project 03-18: Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, Change Order 3 11. Kennard Street Improvements, Project 03-04: Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, Change Order 5 12. Resolution for Adoption of 2005 Public Works Permit Fees 13. County Road D Improvements (TH 61 to Southlawn), Project 02-07: Approve Right of Way Exchange Agreement with Lexus 14. Change Order for Legacy Village Park 15. Resolution Supporting Acquisition of Northern Lights Sculpture 16. Nature Center Donation G. CONSENT AGENDA (continued) 17. Kennard/Frost Neighborhood Street Improvements City Project 02-10: Resolutions for: Directing Modification of Approved Budget and Acceptance of Project 18. Approve Final Budget Revisions and Close Projects, 00-04, 00-ll, 02-02 19. Increase in Building Inspection Fees (Second Reading) H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. 2005 Intoxicating Liquor and 3.2 Beer License Fee Increase 2. 7:00 p.m. Public Hearing on Proposed 2005 Budget and Tax Levy 3. 7:15 p.m. County Road D Court (New County Road D, west of TH 61 to TH 61), City Project 04-06: Resolution Ordering Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications 4. 7:30 p.m. TH 61 East Frontage Road (New County Road D to I-694), City Project 04- 25:Resolution Ordering Improvements and Preparation of Plans and Specifications L AWARD OF BIDS J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Trash Container Storage Code Amendment (Second Reading) K. NEW BUSINESS 1. On-Sale Liquor License -Amanda Kranz, Stargate Bar 2. On-Sale Liquor License -Chad Sprinkel, Broadway Bar & Pizza 3. Gladstone Redevelopment Improvements-Project 04-21 a. Approve Contract with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc for Master Planning Services b. Approve Agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc and SEH, Inc. for Engineering Services c. Authorize Proj ect Funding d. Authorize Preparation of Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) e. Authorize Preparation of Master Framework Plan 4. Conditional Use Permit -Maple Tree Group Home (2831 Southlawn Drive) 5. Ambulance Rates for 2005 6. Beaver Lake School/Geranium Park Drainage Improvements, Project 04-35: Receive Petition and Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study 7. County Road D West Improvements, City Project 02-08 -Approve Four Agreements for Right of Way and Easements with LMCD Properties 8. Set 2005 Tax Levy-No Report L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. December 27, 2004 City Council Meeting O. ADJOURNMENT Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The request far this service must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk's Office at (651) 249-2001 to make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability. RULES OF CIVILITYFOR OUR COMMCINITY Following are some rules of civility the City ofMaplewood expects of everyone appearing at CouncilMeetings -elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone's opinions can be heard and understood in a reasonable manner We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep emotions in check and use respectful language. MINUTES CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP Monday, November 22, 2004 Council Chambers, City Hall 6:34 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. D. E. F. Robert Cardinal, Mayor Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Will Rossbach, Councilmember Others Present: Assistant City Manager Coleman City Engineer Ahl Finance Director Faust City Clerk Guilfoile Human Resource Director Le Fire Chief Lukin Police Chief Thomalla APPROVAL OF AGENDA Present Present Present Present Present Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to approve the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All NEW BUSINESS 1. Emergency Medical Services Plan Presentation Agenda Item D1 City Manager Fursman presented the report to the Council and answered questions presented by them. FUTURE TOPICS ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Juenemann moved to adjourn at 7:00 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All City Council/Manager Workshop 11-22-04 A. B. C. D. DRAFT-- MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:05 P.M. Monday, November 22, 2004 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 04-26 CALL TO ORDER: Agenda Item D2 A meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall, and was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Mayor Cardinal. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Present Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present City Engineer Ahl announced water quality issues within an isolated area in Maplewood. St. Paul Regional Water Services (651-266-6350) is aggressively flushing the system and should have the problem corrected within 48 hours. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes from CounciUManager Workshop, October 25, 2004 Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the October 25t~ City CounciUManager Workshop as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All 2. Minutes from the City Council Meeting, October 25, 2004 Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to approve the minutes from the October 25t~ City Council Meeting as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All 3. Minutes from the CounciUManager Workshop, November 1, 2004 Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the minutes from the November 1st CounciUMana,~er Workshop as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Juenemann, Koppen and Rossbach Abstain-Councilmember Monahan-Junek City Council 11-22-04 4. Minutes from the City Council Meeting, November 8, 2004 Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to a~rove the minutes from the November 8~ City Council Meeting as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Ml. Food Shelf Challenge M2. Home Occupation License M3. Cable Grants Nl. Schedule Meeting with Gladstone Master Development Contract Councilmember Juenemann moved to a~rove the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Monahan-Junek Ayes-All F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Chamber of Commerce a. City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. Jodie Daulbert, Director of Community Services, St. Paul Area Chamber, introduced herself and presented goals of the Chamber. G. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 575.00 Checks # 65365 thru # 65366 dated 11 /04/04 $ 484,358.01 Checks # 65367 thru # 65426 dated 11 /09/04 $ 136,389.78 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 10/29/04 thru 11/04/04 $ 10,026.00 Checks # 65427 thru # 65428 dated 11 /09/04 $ 427,752.98 Checks # 65429 thru # 65479 dated 11/12/04 thru 12/16/04 City Council 11-22-04 2 827,601.65 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 11-OS-04 thru 11-10-04 $ 1,886,703.42 Total Accounts Payable PAYR(~T,T, Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 11-05- 423,969.22 04 5,697.45 Payroll Deduction check # 99348 thru # 99353 dated 11-OS-04 429,666.67 Total Payroll $ 2,316,370.09 GRAND TOTAL 2. Final Plat -Trout Land (County Road D and Highway 61) Approved the Trout Land final plat date-stamped November 11, 2004. The developer shall comply with the following before the city will sign the final plat: 1. Revised the plat re-labeling Outlot number. 2. Provide all required easements, agreements and dedications or provide escrow subject to the requirements of the city engineer. Conditional Use Permit Review 5-8 Club (2289 Minnehaha Avenue) Approved to review the conditional use permit for the 5-8 Tavern and Grill at 2289 Minnehaha Avenue again only if a problem arises or if significant changes are proposed to the site. 4. Increase in Miscellaneous Service Charges for 2005 Approved to increase the miscellaneous service charges by 1.3% effective January 1, 2005 to keep up with inflation. Financial Transfer for Unassessed Water Improvements Authorized a $33,460 transfer from the Water Availability Charge Fund-St. Paul Water District to the Debt Service Fund for the 2002 Improvement Refunding Bonds. 6. Legacy Parkway Improvements, Project 03-26--Resolution for Modification of the Construction Contract, Change Order No. 1 for Legacy Trail Retaining Wall Adopted the following resolution directing the modification of the construction contract with Ryan Contracting by $75,647.50 for the Legacy Parkway Improvements, City Project 03-26, by approving Change Order Number 1: City Council 11-22-04 RESOLUTION 04-11-202 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 03-26, Legacy Parkway Improvements, Southlawn to Hazelwood, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 03-26, Change Order No. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 1 in the amounts of $75,647.50. The revised contract amount is $1,230,351.20. No revision to the financing plan is required at this time as all items fall within the proposed budget. 7. County Road D Realignment (West), City Project 02-08--Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, Change Order No 2 Adopted the following resolution directing the modification of the existing construction contract, Change Order Number 2, for the County Road D West Improvements 9TH 61 to Walter Street), City Project 02-08: RESOLUTION 04-11-203 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 02-08, CHANGE ORDER No. 2 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 02-08, County Road D Realignment (West) Improvements (TH 61 to Walter Street), and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 02-08, Change Order No. 2, as an increase to said contract by an amount of $25,042.40, such that the new contract amount is now and hereby established as $647,160.08. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the City of Maplewood to signify and show that the existing contract is hereby modified through said Change Order No. 2 as a contract increase in the amount of $25,042.40. The revised contract amount is $647,160.08. No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these changes fall within the original project scope and budget. County Road D Realignment (East), City Project 02-07--Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, Change Order Nos. 2, 3, and 4. Approval of Claims Adopted the following resolution directing the modification of the existing construction City Council 11-22-04 contract, Change Order Nos 2, 3, 4, and for the County Road D West Improvements (TH 61 to Southlawn Drive): RESOLUTION 04-11-205 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 02-07, CHANGE ORDER Nos. 2, 3 & 4 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement, Project 02-07, County Road D Realignment (East) Improvements (TH 61 to Southlawn Dr.), and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reported that it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 02-07, Change Order Nos. 2, 3 and 4, as an increase to said contract by an amount of $8,169.76, such that the new contract amount is now and hereby established as $2,378,031.87. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the City of Maplewood to signify and show that the existing contract is hereby modified through said Change Order Nos. 2, 3 and 4 as a contract increase in the amount of $8,169.76. The revised contract amount is $2,378,031.87. No revisions to the project budget are required at this time, as these changes fall within the original project scope and budget. Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to approve consent agenda items 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve consent agenda item 2 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve consent agenda item 5 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All H. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:00 p.m. Hazelwood Street Improvements (Beam Ave. to County Rd. D), Project 03-39 Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing (4 votes) City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. City Engineer Vermeersch presented specifics from the report. c. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: City Council 11-22-04 None d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution establishing a project budget of $1,423,800. The financing plan is outlined specifically in the feasibility study and call for funding from two sources: assessments and municipal state aid bonds: RESOLUTION 04-11-206 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 8th day of November, 2004, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the Hazelwood Street Improvements, City Project 03-39, AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on November 22, 2004, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to Hazelwood Street under Hazelwood Street Improvements, City Project 03-39. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 22nd day of November 2004. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $1,423,800 shall be established. The proposed financing plan is as follows: Street and Storm Assessments: $ 407,200 (29 %) Municipal State Aid Bonds: $1,016,600 (71%) Total: $1,423,800 (100%) Seconded by Councilmember Monahan-Junek Ayes-All 2. 7:15 p.m. Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, Project 04-15 Resolution Ordering Improvement after Public Hearing, (4 votes) City Manager Fursman presented the report. b. City Engineer Laberee presented specifics from the report. Mayor Cardinal opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The City Council 11-22-04 following person was heard: Dennis Joriman, 1349 E. Belmont Lane, Maplewood d. Mayor Cardinal closed the public hearing. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the following resolution orderin tg he improvement of the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04-15: RESOLUTION 04-11-207 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 8th day of November, 2004, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04-15. AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on November 22, 2004, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to Gladstone North Area Street Improvements, City Project 04-15. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted the 22nd day of November 2004. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $2,766,600 shall be established. The proposed financing plan is as follows: Street assessments: $ 905,200 (32%) Storm assessments: $ 21,420 (1%) Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund: $ 107,270 (4 %) SPRWS Obligation: $ 25,540 (1%) City general tax levy: $ 1,707,170 62% Total $ 2,766,600 (100%) Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All I. AWARD OF BIDS None City Council 11-22-04 J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Home Occupation License-David Grupa Photography (1994 Duluth Street) City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report. David Grupa, the applicant, provided further specifics and answered questions from the council. d. Wayne Nelson, homeowner at 1995 Duluth Street, addressed the council. Councilmember Monahan-Junek moved to approve the home occupation license for Mr. Grupa of 1994 Duluth Street to have a photography studio. This approval shall be subject to the following conditions: Meet all conditions of the city~s home occupation ordinance. This includes: a. No traffic shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volume than would normally be expected in a residential neighborhood. b. The need for off-street parking shall not exceed more than three off-street parking spaces for home occupation at any given time, in addition to the parking spaces required by the residents. c. No equipment or process shall be used in such home occupation that creates noise, vibration, light, glare, fumes, smoke, dust, odors or electrical interference detectable to the normal senses off the lot. d. There shall be no fire, safety or health hazards. e. The studio shall not exceed 514 square feet in area. 2. Customer hours for this home occupation are limited to: Monday through Friday 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. and Saturday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 3. There shall be no more than 25 appointments at the business per week. 4. All customers or visitors to the business shall park on the driveway. 5. Provide afive-pound ABC dry chemical fire extinguisher in the garage. 6. The garage and studio wiring shall meet the state electrical code. 7. Provide a 3-foot egress exit door out of the garage. 8. Obtain a building permit before construction. 9. The remodeling of the exterior of the north and west sides of the garage shall be consistent with the adjacent properties as to not indicate the presence of a home occupation business. 10. Provide screening along the south border of the backyard from the southeast corner of the house to the south edge of the lot line and extending at least 10 feet along the east lot line. This screening is to ensure privacy and lessen the intrusion for the residence located at 1211 Ryan City Council 11-22-04 Avenue. This screening should be in the form of a 6-foot-high solid fence or with the planting of thick shrubs or large trees. 11. There shall be no processing or developing of film on site. 12. The city council may add additional requirements that it deems necessary to ensure that the operation of the home occupation will be compatible with nearby land uses. 13. The city council shall review this home occupation license again in one year. 14. The owner shall return the garage door to operational use after the end of the home occupation. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Conditional Use Permit Phoenix Group Home (1936 Craig Place) City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Planner Roberts presented specifics from the report. Fire Marshall Gervais provided details from the fire inspection report of 1936 Craig Place. d. Building Official Fisher provided further specifics regarding the proposal and answered council questions. e. Jon Brandt, a Maplewood Group Home Owner, informed council of upcoming changes in the rules effecting the operation of group homes. f. Commissioner Desai provided the Maplewood Planning Commission Report. Councilmember Juenemann moved denial of the resolution approving a conditional use permit for Phoenix Group Homes to have up to eight residents living in their residential facility at 1936 Crai Pg lace. City Attorney Kelly reiterated that denial was based on paragraph 4 of the conditional use permit finding of fact, the Fire Marshall `s report and traffic and parking concerns. Seconded by Councilmember Monahan-Junek Ayes-All 2. Emergency Medical Services Model City Manager Fursman presented the staff report and specifics from the report. Mayor Cardinal moved to accept the Emergency Medical Services Model (Option A). This Model would be for a h,, b~program which moves the Community Service Officers and Paramedics to the Fire Department and would call for the hirin,~ of an EMS Coordinator and one additional Fire Fighter/Paramedic. City Council 11-22-04 Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Trash Container Ordinance (First Reading) City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. Ayes-Mayor Cardinal Councilmembers Juenemann, Monahan-Junek and Rossbach Nays-Councilmember Koppen b. Fire Marshall Gervais presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the first reading of the following amended Trash Container Ordinance: Amended Trash Container Ordinance 853 Containers shall be placed along side the garage, side of the house or at the rear of the premises and these locations shall not interfere with any adjoining property. All trash shall be in the container and the lid closed to prevent trash from falling out. Exceptions: The City Official may allow an exception to this ordinance or the homeowner/property owner can appeal to the city council. Seconded by Mayor Cardinal 4. Environmental Utility Rates for 2005 City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. Ayes-Mayor Cardinal, Councilmembers Koppen, Monahan- Junek and Rossbach Nays-Councilmember Juenemann b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Rossbach moved to increase the environmental utility rates by 96% effective January 1, 2005 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 2005 budget. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical Permit Fees for 2005 City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report. Building Official Fisher presented further specifics from the report and answered council questions. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve increase in the building, mechanical, plumbing and electrical permit fees effective Ol-Ol-OS to cover the full cost of inspections. Seconded by Councilmember Monahan-Junek Ayes-All City Council 11-22-04 10 6. Increase in Community Development Department Service Charges for 2005 a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve increases in the Community Development Department fees and approved the first reading of an ordinance to increase the planning fees' Seconded by Mayor Cardinal Ayes-All 7. Recycling Rates for 2005 a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Rossbach moved to increase the rec.~g service rates by $0.65 per quarter effective January 1, 2005 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 2005 budget. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All Sanitary Sewer Rates for 2005 City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to increase the sanitary sewer rates by 7.8% effective January 1, 2005 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 2005 Budget. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All 9. Authorization to Refinance Series 1995B Bonds City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented specifics from the report. Mayor Cardinal moved to adopt the following resolution which will authorize the issuance of refunding bonds to accomplish the refinancing_ RESOLUTION 04-11-204 PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $650,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2004F, PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF TAX INCREMENTS AND AD VALOREM TAXES A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City"), has heretofore created Development District No. 1 (the "Development District") pursuant to the provisions City Council 11-22-04 11 of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, and has approved a development program (the "Program") with respect to the Development District; and B. WHEREAS, the City Council has also heretofore established Housing District No. 1-3 within the Development District (the "Tax Increment District") under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179 and has approved a tax increment financing plan (the "Plan") with respect to the Tax Increment District; and C. WHEREAS, tax increments derived from the Tax Increment District are referred to herein as the "Tax Increments"; and D. WHEREAS, the City has heretofore determined and declared that it is necessary and expedient to provide moneys for a current refunding of the $1,215,000 original principal amount of General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1995B, dated September 1, 1995 (the "Prior Bonds") which mature on and after February 1, 2006; and E. WHEREAS, $635,000 of the principal amount of the Prior Bonds which mature on and after February 1, 2006, are callable on February 1, 2005 (the "Refunded Bonds"), at a price of par plus accrued interest, as provided in the Resolution of the City Council adopted on August 24, 1995, authorizing the issuance of the Prior Bonds (the "Prior Resolution"); and F. WHEREAS, the refunding of the Refunded Bonds is consistent with covenants made with the holders thereof and is necessary and desirable for the reduction of debt service cost to the Issuer; and G. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in St. Paul, Minnesota ("Springsted"), as its independent financial advisor for the sale of the Bonds and was therefore authorized to sell the Bonds by private negotiation in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9) and a proposal to purchase the Bonds has been solicited by Springsted; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Acceptance of Offer. The offer of Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC, in Minneapolis Minnesota (the "Purchaser"), to purchase the Bonds in accordance with the terms and at the rates of interest hereinafter set forth, and to pay therefor the sum of $650,000 plus any interest accrued to settlement, are hereby accepted. 2. Purpose; Refundin Fg findings. The Bonds shall provide funds for a current refunding of the Refunded Bonds (the "Refunding"). It is hereby found, determined and declared that the Refunding is pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, and shall result in a reduction of debt service cost to the Issuer. 3. Original Issue Date; Denominations; Maturities; Interest; Mandatory Redemption. The Bonds shall be dated December 8, 2004, as the date of original issue, shall be issued forthwith on or after such date in fully registered form. The Bonds shall be numbered R-1 in the denomination of $650,000. The Bonds shall mature on February 1, 2009 and shall be redeemed by lot on February 1 at their principal amount, without any premium, plus accrued interest thereon to such redemption date in the following years and principal amounts (after any credits are made as provided below): Mandatory Redemption Schedule Year Principal Amount 2006 $165,000 City Council 11-22-04 12 2007 175,000 2008 185,000 2009 (maturity) 125,000 or, if less than such amount is then outstanding, an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding. The Issuer may, at its option to be exercised on or before the thirtieth day next preceding any date specified in the Mandatory Redemption Schedule above, deliver to the Bond Registrar written notice, which shall (i) specify a principal amount of such Bonds previously redeemed (otherwise than pursuant to the above Mandatory Redemption Schedule) or purchased and cancelled by the Bond Registrar and not theretofore applied as a credit against any redemption of Bonds pursuant to the above Mandatory Redemption Schedule, and (ii) instruct the Bond Registrar to apply the principal amount of such Bonds so delivered or previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled for credit against the principal installments to be prepaid pursuant to the Mandatory Redemption Schedule and selected by the Issuer. Each such Bond so delivered or previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled shall be credited by the Bond Registrar against the principal installments to be prepaid pursuant to the Mandatory Redemption Schedule and selected by the Issuer. 4. Bond Re isg tray. The Clerk, City of Maplewood, Minnesota, is appointed to act as bond registrar and transfer agent with respect to the Bonds (the "Bond Registrar"), and shall do so unless and until a successor Bond Registrar is duly appointed, all pursuant to any contract the City and Bond Registrar shall execute which is consistent herewith. The Bond Registrar shall also serve as paying agent unless and until a successor paying agent is duly appointed. Principal and interest on the Bonds shall be paid to the registered holders (or record holders) of the Bonds in the manner set forth in the form of Bond. 5. Form of Bond. The Bonds, together with the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Registration, shall be in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD R-1 $650,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 2004F Interest Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue 2.69% December 1, 2009 December 8, 2004 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: SIX HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, Ramsey County, Minnesota (the "Issuer"), certifies that it is indebted and for value received promises to pay to the registered owner specified above, or registered assigns duly certified on the Certificate of Registration attached to and made a part of this Bond (the "Owner"), in the manner hereinafter set forth, the principal amount specified above, on the maturity date specified above, without option of prior payment, and to pay interest thereon semiannually on February 1 and August 1 of each year (each, an "Interest Payment Date"), commencing August 1, 2005, at the rate per annum specified above (calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) until the principal sum is paid or has been provided for. At the time of final payment of all City Council 11-22-04 13 principal and interest on this Bond, the Owner shall surrender this Bond to the Clerk, City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "Bond Registrar"). Mandatory Redemption. The Bond of this issue (the ~'Bonds~) shall be redeemed by lot on February 1 in the following years and principal amounts, at their principal amount, without any premium, plus accrued interest thereon to such redemption date (after any credits are made as provided below): Mandatory Redemption Schedule Year Principal Amount 2006 $165,000 2007 175,000 2008 185,000 2009 (maturity) 125,000 or, if less than such amount is then outstanding, an amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then outstanding. The Issuer may, at its option to be exercised on or before the thirtieth day next preceding any date specified in the Mandatory Redemption Schedule above, deliver to the Bond Registrar written notice, which shall (i) specify a principal amount of such Bonds previously redeemed (otherwise than pursuant to the above Mandatory Redemption Schedule) or purchased and cancelled by the Bond Registrar and not theretofore applied as a credit against any redemption of Bonds pursuant to the above Mandatory Redemption Schedule, and (ii) instruct the Bond Registrar to apply the principal amount of such Bonds so delivered or previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled for credit against the principal installments to be prepaid pursuant to the Mandatory Redemption Schedule and selected by the Issuer. Each such Bond so delivered or previously redeemed or purchased and cancelled shall be credited by the Bond Registrar against the principal installments to be prepaid pursuant to the Mandatory Redemption Schedule and selected by the Issuer. Issuance; Purpose; General Obli ag tion. This Bond is issued as a single instrument in the total principal amount of $650,000, pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on November 22, 2004 (the "Resolution"), for the purpose of providing funds for a current refunding of the Issuer's General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1995B, dated September 1, 1995, which mature on and after February 1, 2006. This Bond is payable out of the Debt Service Account of the General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2004F Fund. This Bond constitutes a general obligation of the Issuer, and to provide moneys for the prompt and full payment of its principal, premium, if any, and interest when the same become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the Issuer have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. Manner of Payment. The principal of and interest on this Bond are payable when due by check or draft mailed or otherwise delivered by or on behalf of the Clerk to the Owner hereof as of the end of the fifteenth day of the month, whether or not a business day (the "Record Date"), immediately preceding the applicable payment due date; provided that if the Issuer shall be in default in payment of interest due on said date, whenever money becomes available for payment of such defaulted interest, the Clerk shall establish a special Record Date with respect to the payment thereof and shall mail written notice of the special Record Date not less than fifteen days prior to such date to the person that was the Owner of the Bond as of the close of business of the Issuer on the fifth business day of the Issuer preceding such mailing, and the Owner as of the special Record Date shall be entitled to receive the payment of such defaulted interest. All principal of and interest on this Bond are payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on the date of payment is legal tender for the payment of public and private debts. City Council 11-22-04 14 Date of Payment Not a Business Day. If the nominal date for payment of any principal of or interest on this Bond shall not be a business day of the Issuer or of the Owner, then the date for such payment shall be the next such business day and payment on such business day shall have the same force and effect as if made on the nominal date of payment. Transfer. This Bond is transferable, as provided in the Resolution, upon the Register kept by the Clerk upon surrender of this Bond together with a written instrument of transfer duly executed by the Owner or the Owner's attorney duly authorized in writing, and thereupon a new, fully registered Bond in the same aggregate principal amount shall be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor (or the transfer shall be duly recorded on the Register and the Certificate of Registration hereof), upon the payment of charges and satisfaction of applicable conditions, if any, as therein prescribed; provided that such transfer may occur only with respect to the entire Bond and all of the remaining principal amount of the sole final maturity hereof. The Issuer may treat and consider the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute Owner hereof for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of the principal of and interest on this Bond (except for the payment of interest to the Owner as of a Record Date) and for all other purposes whatsoever. No Desi,~nation as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obli atg ions. The City will not qualify the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to happen and to be performed, precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond, have been done, have happened and have been performed, in regular and due form, time and manner as required by law, and that this Bond, together with all other debts of the Issuer outstanding on the date of original issue hereof and the date of its issuance and delivery to the original purchaser, does not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation of indebtedness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, by its City Council has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual signatures of its Mayor and its Clerk, the corporate seal of the Issuer having been intentionally omitted as permitted by law. Date of Registration: December 8, 2004 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA REGISTRABLE BY AND PAYABLE AT: Its:_ City Clerk Mayor City of Maplewood, Minnesota Its: _ Clerk CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION The transfer of ownership of the principal amount of the attached Bond may be made only by the registered owner or the registered owner's legal representative last noted below: Date of Registration Registered Owner Signature of Bond Re ig strar City Council 11-22-04 15 6. Execution. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the manual signatures of its Mayor and Clerk, the seal having been omitted as permitted by law. In the event of disability or resignation or other absence of either such officer, the Bonds maybe signed by the signature of that officer who may act on behalf of such absent or disabled officer. In case either such officer whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of the Bonds, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if the officer had remained in office until delivery. 7. Delivery; A~lication of Proceeds. The Bonds when so prepared and executed shall be delivered by the Finance Director to the Purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price, and the Purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the proper application thereof. 8. Fund and Accounts. There is hereby created a special fund to be designated the "General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2004F Fund" (the "Fund") to be administered and maintained by the Finance Director as a bookkeeping account separate and apart from all other funds maintained in the official financial records of the City. The Fund shall be maintained in the manner herein specified until all of the Bonds and the interest thereon have been fully paid. There shall be maintained and created in the fund the "Payment Account" and a "Debt Service Account": (a) Payment Account. The proceeds of the Bonds, less any accrued interest, shall be deposited in the Payment Account. On or prior to February 1, 2005, the Clerk shall transfer $635,000 of the proceeds of the Bonds from the Payment Account to the paying agent for the Refunded Bonds, which sum is sufficient, together with other funds on deposit in debt service account established for the Refunded Bonds, to pay the principal and interest due on the Refunded Bonds on February 1, 2005, including the principal of the Refunded Bonds called for redemption on that date. The remainder of the monies in the Payment Account shall be used to pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds. Any monies remaining in the Payment Account after payment of all costs of issuance and payment of the Refunded Bonds shall be transferred to the Debt Service Account. (b) Debt Service Account. There are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to, and there shall be credited to, the Debt Service Account: (i) Tax Increments in an amount which, together with other revenues herein pledged to the payment thereof, are sufficient to pay the principal and interest to become due on the Bonds; (ii) all collections of ad valorem taxes herein or hereafter levied; (iii) any balance remaining after February 1, 2005, in the Prior Bonds Debt Service Account created by the Prior Resolution; (iv) all investment earnings on funds in the Debt Service Account; (v) funds remaining in the Payment Account after all costs of issuing the Bonds have been paid; and (vi) any and all other moneys which are properly available and are appropriated by the governing body of the Issuer to the Debt Service Account. The Debt Service Account shall be used solely to pay the principal and City Council 11-22-04 16 interest and any premiums for redemption of the Bonds and any other general obligation bonds of the City hereafter issued by the City and made payable from said account as provided by law. No portion of the proceeds of the Bonds shall be used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments or to replace funds which were used directly or indirectly to acquire higher yielding investments, except (a) for a reasonable temporary period until such proceeds are needed for the purpose for which the Bonds were issued and (b) in addition to the above in an amount not greater than the lesser of five percent of the proceeds of the Bonds or $100,000. To this effect, any proceeds of the Bonds and any sums from time to time held in the Fund (or any other City account which will be used to pay principal or interest to become due on the Bonds) in excess of amounts which under then applicable federal arbitrage regulations may be invested without regard to yield shall not be invested at a yield in excess of the applicable yield restrictions imposed by said arbitrage regulations on such investments after taking into account any applicable "temporary periods" or "minor portion" made available under the federal arbitrage regulations. Money in the Fund shall not be invested in obligations or deposits issued by, guaranteed by or insured by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof if and to the extent that such investment would cause the Bonds to be "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). 9. Prior Bonds; Security. Until retirement of the Prior Bonds, all provisions for the security thereof shall be observed by the Issuer and all of its officers and agents. 10. Tax Increments. The City hereby pledges and appropriates the Tax Increments to the Debt Service Account, which pledge and appropriation shall continue until the Bonds are paid or discharged. 11. Tax Levy; Coverage Test; Cancellation of Certain Tax Levies. To provide moneys for payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property in the City a direct annual ad valorem tax which shall be spread upon the tax rolls and collected with and as part of other general property taxes in the City for the years and in the amounts as follows: Years of Tax Lew Years of Tax Collection Tax Levy Amount 2004 2005 $152,186.14 2005 2006 155,322.83 2006 2007 160,879.95 2007 2008 92,654.63 The tax levies are such that if collected in full they, together with estimated collections of Tax Increments and other revenues herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds, will produce at least five percent in excess of the amount needed to meet when due the principal and interest payments on the Bonds. The tax levies shall be irrepealable so long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid, provided that the City reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3. Upon payment of the Prior Bonds, the taxes levied by the Prior Resolution shall be canceled. 12. Reservation of Rights. Notwithstanding any provisions herein to the contrary, the City reserves the right to terminate, reduce, or apply to other lawful purposes the Tax Increments herein pledged to the payment of the Bonds and interest thereon to the extent and in the manner permitted by law. City Council 11-22-04 17 13. Future Tax Levies. On or before October 10 of each year, the Clerk shall certify to the County Auditor of Ramsey County the amount of Tax Increments and any other funds appropriated to and then held in the Debt Service Account and the estimated collections of Tax Increments to be received in the next succeeding year. In the event that it is anticipated that the aggregate of said sums will not be sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds to become due in the first calendar year thereafter and the first six months of the succeeding calendar year, the City Council shall pass a resolution requesting the County Auditor of Ramsey County to levy an ad valorem tax in an amount as is necessary, together with the aforementioned funds then held in the Debt Service Account and said estimated collections of Tax Increments, to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds to become due during said period. 14. Defeasance. When all Bonds have been discharged as provided in this paragraph, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the registered holders of the Bonds shall, to the extent permitted by law, cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by irrevocably depositing with the Bond Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Bond Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a suitable banking institution qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities described in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, Subdivision 8, bearing interest payable at such times and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be required, without regard to sale and/or reinvestment, to pay all amounts to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. 15. General Obligation Pledge. For the prompt and full payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds, as the same respectively become due, the full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged. If the balance in the Debt Service Account is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on the Bonds and any other bonds payable therefrom, the deficiency shall be promptly paid out of any other funds of the City which are available for such purpose, and such other funds may be reimbursed with or without interest from the Debt Service Account when a sufficient balance is available therein. 16. Redemption of Refunded Bonds. The Refunded Bonds shall be redeemed and prepaid in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Notice of Call for Redemption attached hereto as Exhibit A, which terms and conditions are hereby approved and incorporated herein by reference. 17. Certificate of Registration. The Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Ramsey County, Minnesota, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require and to obtain the County Auditor's certificate that the Bonds have been entered in the County Auditor's Bond Register and that the tax levy for the Refunded Bonds has been canceled and that the tax levy required by law for the Bonds has been made. 18. Records and Certificates. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to the attorneys approving the legality of the issuance of the Bonds, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds and to the financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as are required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. City Council 11-22-04 18 19. Negative Covenant as to Use of Bond Proceeds and Project. The Issuer hereby covenants not to use the proceeds of the Bonds or to use the improvements financed by the Prior Bonds (the "Project"), or to cause or permit them to be used, or to enter into any deferred payment arrangements for the cost of the Project, in such a manner as to cause the Bonds to be "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Sections 103 and 141 through 150 of the Code. 20. Tax-Exempt Status of the Bonds; Rebate. The City shall comply with requirements necessary under the Code to establish and maintain the exclusion from gross income under Section 103 of the Code of the interest on the Bonds, including without limitation (a) requirements relating to temporary periods for investments, (b) limitations on amounts invested at a yield greater than the yield on the Bonds, and (c) the rebate of excess investment earnings to the United States. The City expects to satisfy the six month expenditure exemption from gross proceeds of the Bonds as provided in Section 1.148-7(c) of the Regulations. The Mayor, Clerk, or either of them, are hereby authorized and directed to make such elections as to arbitrage and rebate matters relating to the Bonds as they deem necessary, appropriate or desirable in connection with the Bonds, and all such elections shall be, and shall be deemed and treated as, elections of the City. 21. No Desi,~nation as Qualified Tax-Exempt Obli atg ions. The Bonds are not issued as "qualified tax exempt obligations" within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. 22. Supplemental Resolution. The Prior Resolution authorizing the issuance of the Prior Bonds is hereby supplemented to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions hereof. 23. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. 24. Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Juenemann and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Robert Cardinal, Kathleen Juenemann, Marvin Koppen, Jackie Monahan-Junek, Will Rossbach. and the following voted against the same: None. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1995B CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN that by order of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on February 1, 2005 those outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1995B dated as of September 1, 1995, having stated maturity dates in the years 2006 through 2009, inclusive, and totaling $635,000 in principal in principal amount and having CUSIP numbers listed below: City Council 11-22-04 19 Year CUSIP No.* 2006 565556 4F1 2007 565556 4G9 2008 565556 4H7 2009 565556 4J3 The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to February 1, 2005, on which date all interest on the bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment, at U.S. Bank National Association, Attention: Paying Agent Services, 180 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. Dated: November 22, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ ,Clerk *The City shall not be responsible for the selection of or use of the CUSIl' numbers, nor is any representation made as to their correctness indicated in the notice. They are included solely for the convenience of the holders. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All 10. New Fire Safety Inspection Fees a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. Chief Lukin presented specifics from the report. Mayor Cardinal moved to adopt an inspection fee for life safe , inspections to businesses in the City of Mablewood base on the fee structure listed and to be effective January 1.2005. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All 11. TH 61 East Frontage Road Improvements (New C Rd D to 694), Project 04-25-- Resolution Receiving Preliminary Report and Calling Public Hearing City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved to adopt the followin,~ resolution a~roving the preliminary report for the TH 61 East frontage Road (New County Road D to 694),City Project 04-25, and to call a public hearing for December 13, 2004 at 7:30 p.m.: RESOLUTION 04-11-208 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted July 26, 2004, a report has been prepared under the direction of the City Engineer by City consultant SEH, Inc., with reference to the improvement of TH 61 Improvements (New County Road D to 694), City Project 04-25 and City Project 03-07, and this report was received by the council on November 22, 2004, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is City Council 11-22-04 20 necessary, cost-effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $356,085. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 13~ day of December 2004 in the council chambers of city hall at 7:30 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Monahan-Junek Ayes-All 12. Gladstone Redevelopment Improvements Proj ect 04-21 a) Approve Consultant Selection for Master Planning and Engineering Services b) Authorize Preparation of Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) c) Authorize Preparation of Master Framework Plan City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved to table all action for the Gladstone Redevelopment Improvements approval until the December 13, 2004 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes-All 13. County Road D Court Improvements (New County Rd D to TH 61), Project 04-06- Resolution Receiving Preliminary Report and Calling Public Hearing City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Koppen moved adopt the following resolution a~roving the preliminaryport for the County Road D Court Improvements (New County Road D to TH 61), City Project 04- 06, and called for a public hearing for December 13, 2004 at 7:15 p.m.: RESOLUTION 04-11-209 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted February 9, 2004, a report has been prepared under the direction of the City Engineer by City consultant SEH, Inc., with reference to the improvement of County Road D Court Improvements (New County Road D to TH 61), City Project 04- 06, and TH 61 Acceleration Lane Improvements, City Project 03-07 and this report was received by the council on November 22, 2004, and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is City Council 11-22-04 21 necessary, cost-effective, and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $653,740. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 13~ day of December 2004 in the council chambers of city hall at 7:15 p.m., and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All 14. Century Avenue Improvements (Interstate 94 to Lake Drive), Project 03-15--Review Environmental Assessment Findings and Review Project Schedule City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the comments on the Century Avenue EAW and Directed the City Engineer to forward the comments as Maplewood~s position on the project. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All 15. Diseased Tree Program Report on 2004 Tree Removals a. City Manager Fursman presented the staff report. b. City Engineer Ahl presented specifics from the report. No action was taken. L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS Food Shelf Challenge-Councilmember Juenemann thanked residents for dropping off food and donations and encouraged all residents and businesses to participate. 2. Home Occupation License-Councilmember Rossbach would like staff to review the current Home Occupation License Ordinance with focus on the 20% limitation. City Council 11-22-04 22 Cable Grants-Mayor Cardinal explained $10,000 is set aside from cable franchise fees that the Cable Commission disseminates to the fifteen cable program producers as a grant. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS The meeting date for council to meet with the Gladstone Development Master Planner will be December 2, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. Further details will be announced and posted within the week. O. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Juenemann moved to adjourn the meetin,~ at 10:23 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes -All City Council 11-22-04 23 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP Thursday, December 02, 2004 Council Chambers, City Hall 5:30 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Absent Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present Others Present: City Manager Fursman Assistant City Manager Coleman City Attorney Kelly Ginny Gaynor, Nature Center C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Juenemann moved to a~rove the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-All D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation by Gladstone Master Planner Agenda Item D3 City Manager Fursman introduced Brad Scheib of Hoisington Koegler as the staff recommendation for a master planner. He indicated they would give an introductory presentation on their approach to planning and the Gladstone Area in particular. Mr. Fursman further indicated the presentation would be brief with questions only coming from the council due to time constraints. He also informed people who came to observe, that council and staff would meet in the Maplewood Room for dinner following the meeting. Brad Scheib introduced his group and outlined the mission. He introduced Rusty Fifield who explained his role in the process. They spoke of who the key stakeholders are and how to get them involved. He identified six tasks that would be implemented throughout the planning process. City Council/Manager Workshop 12-02-04 At the end of the presentation, the council was invited by the Mayor to ask questions. The Mayor invited the public to speak. The following people were heard: Jan Steiner commented on the process. Kevin Schmitt indicated he liked how the process was going. Del Benjamin commented that he hoped the project would go well. Al Singer was pleased by the recommended choice. E. FUTURE TOPICS F. ADJOURNMENT Mayor adjourned the meeting to the Maplewood Room. City Council/Manager Workshop 12-02-04 Agenda Item D4 MEETING SPECIAL MEETING MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. Monday, December 06, 2004 Council Chambers, City Hall Meeting No. 04-27 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. D. Robert Cardinal, Mayor Present Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present Jackie Monahan-Junek, Councilmember Absent Will Rossbach, Councilmember Present Others Present: City Manager Fursman Assistant City Manager Coleman City Clerk Guilfoile Police Chief Thomalla Fire Chief Lukin Human Resource Director Le Parks and Recreation Director Anderson City Engineer Ahl Finance Director Faust IT Director Hurley APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes-All NEW BUSINESS 1. Proposed 2005 Budget and Tax Levy City Manager Fursman reviewed the goals and objectives of the city and identified and prioritized options for the 2005 Budget. The following persons were heard: Jerry Markie-1247 Leland Road, Maplewood Robert Erickson Jr., 47 Kingston, Maplewood Shirlee Miner, 2382 Gall Avenue, Maplewood Gordy Heininger, 796 E. Bellwood Avenue, Maplewood Robert Erickson Jr., Second Appearance Jurgen Droeger, 1443 Laurie Road, Maplewood Ted Sitz, 2348 Dorland Road, Maplewood City Council/Manager Workshop 12-06-04 Barbara Granse, 2141 Prosperity Road, MN Neil Bremer, 2325 Brenwood Curve, Maplewood Len Yanco, 2949 Frank Street, Maplewood Robert Erickson Jr., Third Appearance Edward Fitzgerald, 2284 Moreland Court East, Maplewood Mark Gernes, 1837 McKnight Road, Maplewood Shirlee Miner, Second Appearance Robert Erickson Jr., Fourth Appearance Jerry Markle, Second Appearance Neil Bremer, Second Appearance Bill Adams, 1126 Leland Road, Maplewood The public hearing was continued until December 13, 2004. E. FUTURE TOPICS F. ADJOURNMENT With there being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. City Council/Manager Workshop 12-06-04 Agenda #F1 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: DuWayne Konewko, Environmental Management Specialist SUBJECT: Interviews and Appointments for the Environmental Committee DATE: November 29, 2004 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Committee lost a member due to a resignation. We are therefore conducting interviews to replace the member who resigned. The applicants will be present at the December 13, 2004, City Council workshop for interviews by the City Council. The interview schedule is included on page two and the candidate applications are included in pages three through six. BACKGROUND The Environmental Committee is an ad-hoc committee responsible for advising the City Council and other boards on matters relevant to the environment. The Environmental Committee will consist of seven residents, one of these being a teacher, to assist the committee in facilitating involvement with area schools. One of the committee members will serve as chair. DISCUSSION According to the City Council9s new policy for appointing advisory board vacancies, the City Council will conduct the interviews with the applicants. The council should appoint the new member at the December 13, 2004 City Council meeting. I have also included interview questions for your consideration on page seven. RECOMMENDATION Interview the applicants and appoint one new member to replace the member that resigned. The appointed candidate will serve a three year term. P:/ec/ec re-interview memo (2004) Attachments: 1. Interview Schedule 2. Environmental Committee Applications 3. Proposed Interview Questions ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE DECEMBER 13, 2004 ~ CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MAPLEWOOD ROOM o CITY HALL o 6:00 P.M. 6:10 p.m. o James Beardsley 6:20 p.m. o Haytham Ibrahim 6:30 p.m. o Carol Mason Sherrill 6:40 p.m. o Sherry Asplund 2 NAME_.lames L. Beetdsiey~(, AD[~N2ESS' 2311 Minrtett~ta Ave PHIt~AiE NQ. c:_ ~ i-~ome:_ EMAIL„ _ FAX.,;;.. _., ___ , r _ _ 1) How brtp haw~.you ~ the City of Mapiewcod?_2lyears 2) V1d11 other oommitmerrts malts r+epuiar ai`6endance at me~nDs d~icult? Yes No_X Comments:.. _ __ 3) On which Board or Commission are you. it~fiersstsd in srv~p? (~eaae d~ecdc) . Canmtmity.Desi~n Review Board _Paek & F~cnea~on fission Housin~i ~ Redevebpment Autry Plara~in~ ~ Commission -Human Relations Commssion Poik~e C Seinrics Cission X Environmental Committiee H.P~F+esauv~tiora C+mission 4) Do ~ hie any at~eas of # within +d's or Comrnis~ori's stz~e of rosponsihiltios? I'm a 5~or Product St+swordship Spsc~aiis# 1~oNr 311A. My area of ~d are in J'N trar~on and ~ of t~szardous rti~ededals as weN ss tFw cif ,maMriais; hazardous c~nurwnic~ions and product ~bekng. ~ _ , _ _ ,, ~,:,< t r ~ - ' .. "sr. J: tt ~.' 5) Lies other organizations or dohs ~ the Community in whicfi you haw bean cx ~ an actlw partiapar~ i hays notebeensotiw in 1AapMawood tsstied c-s, but l ~m a ~nber of tie ~r-ssvle Hv~ia~lturai Society, the M Rose I-, the Sosarrr~e Minn of ~so#a and the ~ u Arbantum where 1 haws tam a vduntrer and for. I haw in tho pest adsd ss C~mWnity Education insbn~caor ~ ir~h+oduc3ory and t~ortir~atiuro of noses. ~ Mlhy w~aiid you ~ do serve on the Board or ccmaR,ission? l t it is time I give back m the community and I I have ti're necsssat;t iv~wtedpe and sfdNs to etlbctiveiy serve on this oomm~oee. ADCNTIONAL COMMENTS: One of my currmnt r+esponss inwohres .with such ~ the ~ EPA, the Cal~eomia Air Resources t3oamd and n~nnercus other Cai~amia A~ C9~istric# ~ ~p ~ ~ nput~andc. ,~.,•C.ia':'.'[~i.iM;l;~i~,. c: .;{Ir i:`L:~: rt~~r i~r a' .,, ~:. ~., ' r F++~_ ~~ ~'' '~ C•t <;t~` :.. .~i~.i~ `'%. [.~.+t .... .liw t 7 / ~ !^ f'r,. oaf. ~ 4ilf.::' ' .. :r .2.. .. ,.. L_ _ r' ~, 1. .yam +~~~ ~~. ..4. ~. ,, .. / ~.' ~~ I M~ 4'\d!f'I7"M~V ~ `l !"AS ~r"'l^~f W7 f 1181 /Y~/ ~~~\% f'7~i/t ~ V VI1Y7/f~GR'~ c ~~n~ r.> c TlEt;iP~ ~!cs. -.~ -. ._._t ~ ... Return ar met this app~aaton to: Ci~a d Mse>ssrvod 4830 County t~Oati B East, t~spta~od t~+l 1is11~ sioN.eo~o 3 omoa CITY EJF MARLE1Nt-D Bt?ARU9~ ,ACID CE3#AiY113S1t'~iNS APPLNrA1~1T 1RMATI01~ FtM PHC3NE NO., Work;_ Home:_ ; ~, EMAlL . ~ ~. _~ . 1 .. FAX ~_ - ~ _~ ~ _ _ 1) How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? ~J' .~ ~Cd~/'s 2) WNi other commitments make regular a endanos at meet Comm+en -~- vV ~ ~ u~r' .1~ 1 ~.. ~-° t ....,-- a ;~-~., ~~ Fcr 5 P~! o r 3) On which Boani or Commission are you ktterested in serving? (ease claedc) Community Design Review Board hark & Recreatbn Ccrrnrni~abn Housing & Redevebpment Authority Plannir~ Commdsabn Human Relatbns Commission Poles Civil Servbe Cor~~mbsbn _~„Environmentat Committee H~thric Preset Ccammissbn 4) Do you have any areas of interest wit-hitn th~lis Board's or Commissbn's scope of responsibilities? ~~ f G t+~-~GIU1~1 0~' PU ~~ 1 ~ r/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GJ sj -f~a C~nl~ i (,~ !'r. ~~~/ ~C~ y ~r~ ~~ ~~sy- J'~r /i Par I~AC /ZGu'u~.h+~ ~zt,~' ~f 5) List other organizations or dubs the Community in rich you have been or an add partk.~ipant: ~vf~e~/ wr*CP~ son art ~ STti.~Wl~"t'~~.. ~~~"'C,~ C-v~.~G-t~vnS~t~ ~~C.tt-~tT~' ~ 'V'~s~`ts fiu ~+~w~«.~~s ~'~ Pr~so~ ~~ 6) Why would you like to serve on the t3oani or Commtssbn? ~~~~ ~s~o~ ~~~ ~~- f~r~ ~ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ~/~~- ~ ~ ,~ ~ and. THE INFC)RMATION CONTA/NED IN THIS APPUGATf(1N ANI7 ANY ATTACHMENT FR6?Y~JIED ~ CQNSIDEI~D F~llBltG'INFQRJW t7"~ON E~1'!" FFON hiC? ANC3 C TEL~'Mail'~ ~ER~ Rum or me~l_this aopon to: ~~ °~ ~ ~~c~ivEr 1830 County Road 8 Eaet Mapfewoud' ~ 56109 r~cow~ovPnw oaro4 .., y~ w~. 4 ~~ difficult? Yes~_ No NOV 182004 . , ~ .,~ ,, ~~ `' ~ NOY Z 22004 ~~4RDS l4~iD CQM~tS APPLi~A~lT ~1F-T!t?N FtA 3) 4n v~ltich Board or Corrur~ssion are you i in serving? Ccatttmtmity R+wiesw'Bo~+d P~ft ~ Rec:It~sMtit~n Cvmmispivrt ~Wtx~sing & Redsvebpment Authority FMarminp Ct~mrN~ia~rt Reiat~ons Ctxxr~rrrtission Pciios qv~ 9vs Co~xritsskxt -~- Ccxrttniteae Historic Preserva#o~n Gorrrrtisaion 4) Do y©u t~awe any an(elras of ~te~+est within this Board's or Com~'~ :cape of nrapons~lities? Tug' 'Cor !.gt~ VV~Q.Y~O~w c~.a j~ct~e~cVc'x~eio~,r~ V~~r ~he..~ - vJa~er ~''u0`'1`~~ ~CA..~[~ ~ ~R~ ^- GOw1, Y1rw~~n i'~ y c~ 1~9 0.r GYtt 8 $ ). 5) L~ other orfl~izatfo~ ~ in the t^,o~mimit~r in which. Y~ haws i~sen oc are ~ afire pparrt: 6) 1ARty wrould you like to serve on the 8c~eu+d orCommission? T ~ o v~. ~'~t,_ ~S~y 1 ~~t.~ v~`~tin ~CU,.~ ~a~rS~c~. ~._.~.~~ ~'~`~~-c~-~~"C~~c-m~.o~~~-~- ~ erg ~.. '1wa,~ ~ ~l ~ Y. ~ ~ v~, ~a~~ rvto3 ~ ~r o r~ae~"k'~.S a.+~.e~. ew~c.,c~~ i ~c~ w1~~e.1~ ~ .,C~. ~ 0.c e_wess ~c-~4'~ ~a1 wt„ ~ ~r ra4u~t a,S~ t ~ ct~ AODIV~-L ~~~ste.c~. ~a..~ 0.~1~~0~ `t~ui.o e.~C'~w+nr+~t'l'~~ . wtQ~CoJ ~ ~ av~ t ro'~'~ec~C~~"'C'~.R. Y~~v~.raQ ct1°~-i+~-~ Ce'g v,~L pv.Y' y~,~~_,, ~~rH-e,;o~a, c.~rnm~~n~{~, c~~ o~~y c.~csroc~rc_ c~. ~n+-~pQ+ ter' a"`~ r ~ ~ c ~~^ c~n.~ vt~c~ ~o~a~vExc~rr~ + c r~ei. ~~s R~urn or tNa ~ to: ~a3o couney t ~ East, t~pewood t~1 5s~og 5 ,, ~ ~.:~ CITY ~ iVG4PLEM~D dos aM~ cis ~~~~ ~ NAME. ~ ~-+' ~u~ _, ~~ . _. ADDRESS 2 i ~' l l3 ~ .,-r .~•~ 5~5- ~/ 7 PHONE NO. Work: Home: - - DATE ~ ~ 3, ~. oc~ ~ 1) How km$ have yon livid in the City of Mapie~vood? ~ ~,~.e,z S~-~ ~" 2) Wdl other cotta make regular attendance at meetings di~ff~cult? Yes No ~_ Comnnents: 3) C?n which Board or ' n are interested m serving? (plea$e :check) C'o~o~ty Design ite°view Beard Park 8r Rect+aniun Commie~ioa Housing ~ Ralevtki AnthoritY P~mg a Human Ralations Coun~aion Polix Civd Sa+rvice • n 4) Do you have airy apeafic areas of it~eteat vvithia this Board's or Con's I: of reegat"bt~' i~ea? ~iy •dE~..t C,r'~ n 7~rr.~.f-~S~ t-,..~~-~o~ ,/~,1 r' ~-;~ 1y h.c_. a ` / d .~ np~C S) List other organizations or chubs m the C`~~~' y m arl~6~rou have bean a~ are ea a C~a 5 S r-,c~~rt St nr~"~"!i'C.. - /'9/Ir ~~ /.~vr''~ Sc.~ od ~ ~4' wouldyou 1~7c1,e to serve own t~h/is Board. or Commission? `C.~ ! "`c.~ " / /''t [.~- /!L '~'2... S G•t~'n~.~/t",T7 fz~ , ~ ,,1 v'a~.~,,.1 s' ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: C~L. rEV~'~o-~/~ dvr c~it v~ 1~~'~.S' ,~L'- /Z: ..P'.~C~~ ~ `'~ 'otic a~ -r~s ~- ~ ~r ;~~tr~rvw sett air c~re~a ~s ~+c r ~o~rt ~ r rnr~r ~.r Nw w. ~ a~ '~or•R~ spo a.Mvw..a • 6 a .;11 t: :. a 41 I .. II; ..,. I ~. I ... i .:..:& ..wl Y.:'... •... Ji i f•.. ~.: POSSIBLE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS Welcome applicants and thank them for their interest in serving on the Environmental Committee. Explain the interview and appointment processes. Provide an overview of the duties of the committee members as well as the meeting dates and times. The Environmental Committee"s role is advisory to the council, which makes the final decision. (These items could all be done by the Mayor or could be split among the City Council members). POSSIBLE QUESTIONS 1. Do you foresee any problems with attendance at regularly scheduled meetings? 2. What do you feel you can bring to this committee interests, talents, life experiences, etc? 3. The committee will focus on issues related to the environment such as recycling, solid waste, storm water management, wetlands, and others. Please share your experiences in working with one of these issues or other issues related to the environment. 4. The City of Maplewood tries very hard to balance development and property rights with the protection of our natural resources. Where do you see your interest or concerns in the process of balancing various interests? 5. What types of environmental policies or practices has the City of Maplewood put into place that you feel have made a positive impact on the City? 6. What two environmental issues do you feel the Environmental Committee should address for the City of Maplewood? 7 AGENDA NO. G-1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: December 13, 2004 Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 661.65 Checks # 65480 thru # 65481 dated 11/15/04 $ 1,045,950.35 Checks # 65482 thru # 65543 dated 11/23/04 $ 1,148,717.35 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 11/12/04 thru 11/18/04 $ 233,331.50 Checks # 65544 thru # 65592 dated 11/30/04 $ 2,694,756.03 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 11/19/04 thru 11/23/04 $ 486,794.92 Checks # 65593 thru # 65645 dated 12/03/04 thru 12/07/04 $ 2,494,310.79 Disbursements via debits to checking account dated 11/24/04 thru 12/03/04 $ 8,104,522.59 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $ 450,120.70 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 11/19/04 $ 4,140.47 Payroll Deduction check # 99618 thru # 99621 dated 11/19/04 $ 426,460.75 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 12/03/04 $ 5,724.30 Payroll Deduction check # 99745 thru # 99750 dated 12/03/04 $ 432,185.05 Total Payroll $ 8,536,707.64 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2902 if you have any questions on the attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary. ds attachments c:\My Documents\Excel\Miscellaneous\04-AprClms 11-19, 11-24, 12-03 Check Register City of Maplewood vchlist 11/19/2004 11:15:06 AM Check Date Vendor Description/Account Amount 65480 11/15/2004 02588 DTE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES ANNUAL INSPECTION 443.50 65481 11/15/2004 02588 DTE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES REPAIR HEATER 218.15 65482 11/23/2004 00072 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC HAZMAT STORAGE UNIT WIRING 500.00 65483 11/23/2004 00100 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC DESKTOP RAPID SMART CHARGERS 39,340.84 65484 11/23/2004 00163 BAUER BUILT 20.5R25XHA MICH TIRES 6,662.44 65485 11/23/2004 00202 BOHL, JOHN REIMB FOR MEALS 10/22 TO 10/24 23.70 65486 11/23/2004 00210 BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD LEGACY PARK DESIGN DEV 3,379.25 65487 11/23/2004 00211 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP. PROJ 03-26 PROF SRVS THRU 10/29 1,831.25 PROJ 03-22 PROF SRVS THRU 10/29 340.50 PROJ 02-07 PROF SRVS THRU 10/29 2,439.60 PROJ 02-08 PROF SRVS THRU 10/29 460.05 PROJ 04-15 PROF SRVS THRU 11/5 5,712.87 65488 11/23/2004 02804 BRIDGELAND DEVELOPMENT CO PROJ 02-04 REIMB FOR LS PAVING 1,200.00 65489 11/23/2004 00240 C.S.C. CREDIT SERVICES APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS 50.00 65490 11/23/2004 03273 CERVENKA, VALERIE J INV SPEC SRV CN#04015081 900.00 65491 11/23/2004 00494 CHILDREN HOME & FAMILY SERVICE YOUTH DIVERSION SRVS - NOV 3,423.42 65492 11/23/2004 00392 COMMERCE, DEPT OF RENEWAL FEE -NOTARY PUBLIC COMM 40.00 65493 11/23/2004 03274 CREDIT MANAGEMENT SRVS COLLECTION AGENCY FEE 03011378 460.65 65494 11/23/2004 02791 DAVIS & LAGERMAN INC PROJ 02-07 APPRAISAL SRVS 675.00 PROJ 02-07 APPRAISAL SRVS 945.00 65495 11/23/2004 00413 DON MARTY'S LANDSCAPING RESEED SOCCER FIELDS 1,250.00 65496 11/23/2004 00425 DUCHARME, JOHN P REIMB FOR BOOTS 165.00 65497 11/23/2004 00449 EDEN SYSTEMS INC SOFTWARE LICENSE 2,500.00 65498 11/23/2004 00543 GE CAPITAL RICOH COPIER LEASE 11/13 THRU 12/12 293.94 65499 11/23/2004 00489 INTEREUM INC LATERAL FILE 358.13 65500 11/23/2004 00767 JOHNSON, KEVIN A REIMB FOR MEAL 11/10 14.17 65501 11/23/2004 02728 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC PROJ 02-14 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30 480.01 PROJ 04-02(02-07) PROF SRVS THRU 9/30 795.20 PROJ 02-07 & 02-21 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30 8,384.63 PROJ 03-22 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30 20,829.22 PROJ 03-26 PROF SRVS THRU 9/30 48,749.31 65502 11/23/2004 03272 KOCH, MICHAEL L REF GRADING ESC - 2249 CO RD D E 1,000.00 65503 11/23/2004 01599 LODMILL, SUZANNE DRAMA SUPPLIES 50.22 65504 11/23/2004 01081 M C P A MEMBERSHIP 40.00 65505 11/23/2004 00908 M R P A AGM REGISTRATION - 2 55.00 DESIGN CTR ROUNDTABLE - 1 10.00 MRPA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 360.00 65506 11/23/2004 00914 M W JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION REF GRADING ESC - 1136 CO RD D E 1,139.45 65507 11/23/2004 00925 MAJESTIC LANDSCAPE CONTR INC FALL IRRIGATION SERVICE 150.00 65508 11/23/2004 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 11/12 15.25 65509 11/23/2004 00945 MASYS CORP STRATUS MAINT -DEC 738.68 65510 11/23/2004 00983 METRO SALES INC COPIER LEASE THRU 9/24/05 2,939.13 65511 11/23/2004 03268 MICHAELSON BUILDERS REF GRADING ESC - 1312 BURKE CIR E 1,071.23 65512 11/23/2004 03270 MILLER, MIKE VOLLEYBALL REFEREE - 18 396.00 65513 11/23/2004 01051 MN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 693.00 TRAINING CLASS 450.00 65514 11/23/2004 03276 MN WOMEN IN CITY GOVERNMENT MEMBERSHIP DUES 25.00 65515 11/23/2004 01200 NOVAK, MIKE SAFETY TOE BOOTS 165.00 65516 11/23/2004 03263 ODESSA CONSTRUCTION INC LEGACY VILLAGE PARK THRU 11/10 144,409.59 65517 11/23/2004 01213 OLSON, JULIE REIMB LODGING, MEALS & SUPPLIES 581.39 65518 11/23/2004 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF DOUG CARLSON -MEMBERSHIP 479.25 65519 11/23/2004 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF EMMA NORTON -MEMBERSHIP 446.94 65520 11/23/2004 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF BEVERLY DARLING - AMB 04009447 146.62 65521 11/23/2004 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF GLEN PETERSON -MEMBERSHIP 26.62 65522 11/23/2004 01560 ONYX WASTE SRVS MIDWEST INC RECYCLING PYMT - OCT 16,800.18 65523 11/23/2004 02270 PALDA & SONS INC PROJ 02-08 CTY RD D PYMT #3 246,238.71 2 Check Date Vendor Description/Account Amount 65524 11/23/2004 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF TRAINING REGISTRATION FEE 60.00 65525 11/23/2004 01337 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV VOTING SYSTEM FEE 2,034.32 PROJ 01-16 STRIPING 517.64 PROJ 03-18 STRIPING 75.24 PROJ 03-26 STRIPING 374.40 65526 11/23/2004 01337 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV PROJ 03-22 STRIPING 410.36 65527 11/23/2004 01359 REGAL AUTO WASH DETAIL XX CAR WASHES - OCT 121.32 65528 11/23/2004 01340 REGIONS HOSPITAL PARAMEDIC RECERTIFICATION - 2 240.00 65529 11/23/2004 03172 RYAN CONTRACTING COMPANY PROJ 03-26 LEGACY PKWY PYMT #4 286,694.87 65530 11/23/2004 01409 S.E.H. PROJ 02-07 PROF SRVS -SEP 2,054.71 PROJ 02-07 PROF SRVS -SEP 2,531.52 PROJ 03-07 PROF SRVS -SEP 18,929.32 PROJ 04-06 PROF SRVS -SEP 6,451.02 PROJ 04-22 PROF SRVS -SEP 1,877.00 PROJ 03-04 PROF SRVS -SEP 4,300.92 PROJ 03-04 PROF SRVS -SEP 1,735.05 PROJ 02-07 PROF SRVS - AUG 11.42 65531 11/23/2004 03073 SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC LANDSCAPE ARCH SRVS - OCT 2,487.50 65532 11/23/2004 03278 SKRYPEK'S DAIRY QUEEN BIRTHDAY DQ CAKES 109.50 65533 11/23/2004 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF ELECTION ENVELOPES 275.04 PARAMEDIC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2,912.85 65534 11/23/2004 03059 SUITER, RONALD REF GRADING ESC - 1168 FERNDALE 1,045.34 65535 11/23/2004 02853 SVENDSEN, JOANNE REIMB FOR LUNCH & MILEAGE 11/12 13.33 65536 11/23/2004 01568 SWANSON, LYLE REIMB FOR SAFETY WORK SHOES 11/18 51.00 65537 11/23/2004 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC ASPHALT 476.15 65538 11/23/2004 01578 T.R.F. SUPPLY CO. TOWELS & GLOVES 362.23 65539 11/23/2004 03277 TROUTLAND LLC PROJ 02-08 CTY RD D IMPRV 135,000.00 65540 11/23/2004 03275 W P E L R A TRAINING 11/22 55.00 65541 11/23/2004 01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P. COMM PLUMBING INSP 480.00 65542 11/23/2004 01764 WESTLING, TOM TENNIS INSTRUCTOR 3,546.86 65543 11/23/2004 02243 WINDSOR COMPANIES INC IRRIGATION SRVS - OCT 85.00 64 Checks in this report Total checks : 1,046,612.00 3 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 11/10/04 11/12/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 16,078.69 11/09/04 11/12/04 ARC Administration DCRP & Flex plan payments 1,708.73 11/12/04 11/15/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 13,929.11 11/15/04 11/15/04 JP Morgan Chase Investment purchase 1,019,690.00 11/14/04 11/15/04 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 328.00 11/15/04 11/16/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 17,003.30 11/16/04 11/17/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 12,574.84 11/17/04 11/18/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 10,657.80 11/12/04 11/18/04 Elan Financial Services* Purchasing card items 56,746.88 TOTAL 1,148,717.35 *Detailed listings of Elan purchasing card items are attached. 4 Check Register City of Maplewood vchlist 11/24/2004 1:12:35 PM Check Date Vendor Description/Account Amount 65544 11/30/2004 00111 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES INC PATROL & BOARDING FEES 11/2 - 11/12 890.01 PATROL & BOARDING FEES 11/13 - 11/22 713.81 65545 11/30/2004 02733 ARM OF MN TRAINING REGISTRATION 325.00 65546 11/30/2004 03279 ATTORNEYS TITLE OF STILLWATER REF GRADING ESC - 2091 CTY RD D 11,864.14 65547 11/30/2004 01811 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC MERCH FOR RESALE 54.00 MERCH FOR RESALE 162.00 65548 11/30/2004 00289 CHEMSEAL, INC. PROJ 01-16 DRIVEWAY SEALING 288.80 65549 11/30/2004 03131 CIRCUITWORKS BATTERY PACKS- 5,144.25 65550 11/30/2004 00460 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH CONCRETE PRODUCTS 1,393.02 CONCRETE PRODUCTS 1,629.76 65551 11/30/2004 03280 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS/ GROUND LADDER SAFETY INSP 900.55 LADDER PARTS 61.00 65552 11/30/2004 00412 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES TRAINING -BOOKS 152.19 65553 11/30/2004 02308 FLAUGHER, JAYME REIMB FOR MILEAGE 10/18 TO 10/20 45.75 65554 11/30/2004 00589 GRAF, DAVE KARATE INSTRUCTOR 243.75 65555 11/30/2004 00610 GULDENS ROADHOUSE INC PROJ 02-08 EASEMEMT 40,000.00 65556 11/30/2004 01965 HEALTH PARTNERS REF AMB 04011510 S KANTOROWICZ 601.97 65557 11/30/2004 00489 INTEREUM INC OFFICE FURNITURE 2,784.02 CREDIT -OFFICE FURNITURE -466.47 OFFICE FURNITURE 400.06 65558 11/30/2004 00393 LABOR & INDUSTRY, DEPT OF BOILER LICENSE TRAINING -EXAM 30.00 65559 11/30/2004 03256 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE PROF SRVS THRU 10/31 48.00 65560 11/30/2004 02060 LITTLE CANADA, CITY OF 2003-2004 BASKETBALL PROGRAM 1,355.00 65561 11/30/2004 00932 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY BIRTHDAY CAKES 45.75 BIRTHDAY CAKES 45.75 BIRTHDAY CAKES 15.25 65562 11/30/2004 03098 MCFARLANE PROPERTIES LLC PROJ 02-08 R-O-W ACOUISTION 93,776.00 65563 11/30/2004 01819 MCLEOD USA LOCAL PHONE SRVS 10/16 - 11/15 2,104.98 65564 11/30/2004 01018 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT AUTOMATED PAWN SET UP FEE 1,050.00 65565 11/30/2004 01082 MN DARE OFFICERS ASSN DARE OFFICER MEMBERSHIP 35.00 65566 11/30/2004 01126 MN NCPERS LIFE INSURANCE PERA LIFE INS (PAYROLL DED IN NOV) 213.00 65567 11/30/2004 01175 NORTH ST PAUL, CITY OF MONTHLY UTIL -BILL DATE 11/15/2004 2,232.06 65568 11/30/2004 01174 NORTH ST PAUL-MAPLE WOOD- ROTARY CLUB MEMBERSHIP 225.00 65569 11/30/2004 00001 ONE TIME VENDOR REF SUSAN WHITNEY -MCC CLASS 30.00 65570 11/30/2004 01254 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY MERCH FOR RESALE 321.60 65571 11/30/2004 01289 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC PRAIRIE RESTORATION 3,097.50 65572 11/30/2004 01295 PREMIER BANK SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 00427 75.00 SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 00524 75.00 SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 00543 75.00 SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 00549 75.00 65573 11/30/2004 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF TRAINING REGISTRATION FEE 225.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FEE - 2 240.00 65574 11/30/2004 00396 PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPT OF TRANSFER 3 TITLES -FORFEITURE VEH 40.50 65575 11/30/2004 02008 RAMSEY COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS STRIPE CITY STREETS 12,592.94 65576 11/30/2004 01340 REGIONS HOSPITAL PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES 121.22 65577 11/30/2004 01360 REINHART FOODSERVICE MERCH FOR RESALE 42.24 65578 11/30/2004 02001 ROSEVILLE, CITY OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT MIS - NOV 625.00 65579 11/30/2004 01387 ROSSINI, DR. JAMES FITNESS PROGRAM - NOV 100.00 65580 11/30/2004 03267 S K LANDSCAPES REF GRADING ESC - 2215 CRAIG PL N 1,000.00 65581 11/30/2004 01504 ST PAUL, CITY OF RADIO SRV & MAINT - OCT 740.81 ASPHALT MIX - OCT 664.92 CRIME LAB SRVS - OCT 120.00 65582 11/30/2004 01522 STATE OF MINNESOTA TRAFFIC CITATIONS 11/1 THRU 10/31/04 1,167.40 65583 11/30/2004 01574 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC ASPHALT 409.76 5 Check Date Vendor 65584 11/30/2004 01594 TERRYBERRY COMPANY LLC 65585 11/30/2004 01026 TRANSPORTATION, DEPT OF 65586 11/30/2004 01580 TSE, INC. 65587 11/30/2004 01683 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 65588 11/30/2004 01709 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL 65589 11/30/2004 01734 WALSH, WILLIAM P. 65590 11/30/2004 02410 WELLS FARGO LEASING INC 65591 11/30/2004 01190 XCEL ENERGY 65592 11/30/2004 01805 ZIEGLER INC. 49 Checks in this report Description/Account Amount EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION PINS 179.44 INSPECTIONS 561.62 CUSTODIAL SRVS 9/20 TO 10/15 904.93 UNIFORM 129.35 PANTS 129.00 GATOR HAWK LVL 3A VEST 769.50 TRASH REMOVAL 678.00 COMMERCIAL PLUMBING INSP 68.00 RICOH COPIER LEASE 11/9 - 12/9 1,467.57 MONTHLY UTILITIES -STMT DATE 11/3/04 35,952.05 TRUCK RENTAL 10/22 - 10/28 2,289.75 Total checks : 233,331.50 6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee Description Amount 11/18/04 11/19/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 6,983.11 11/19/04 11/19/04 ICMA (Vantagepointe) Deferred Compensation 7,728.59 11/09/04 11/19/04 MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax 10,631.00 11/18/04 11/19/04 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 174.00 11/19/04 11/19/04 Dain Rauscher Investment purchase 2,467,708.33 11/19/04 11/22/04 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 12,098.95 11/19/04 11/22/04 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 84,961.54 11/19/04 11/22/04 P.E.R.A. P.E.R.A. 50,336.31 11/09/04 11/22/04 MN Dept of Revenue Fuel Tax 289.00 11/19/04 11/22/04 Pitney Bowes Postage 2,985.00 11/19/04 11/22/04 Orchard Trust Deferred Compensation 22,140.78 11/22/04 11/23/04 MN State Treasurer 11,271.00 11/19/04 11/23/04 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 17,014.42 11/19/04 11/23/04 MSA/Dispatcher Unions Union Dues 184.00 11/19/04 11/23/04 Federal Reserve Bank Savings Bonds 250.00 TOTAL L,by4, /Sb.U:i 7 Transaction Review 11 / 19 / 2 0 0 4 For Transactions posted between 10/30/2004 to 11/12/2004 Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 11/08/2004 U OF M CCE ON LINE 195.00 R CHARLES AHL 11/09/2004 VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 62.15 R CHARLES AHL 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 704.18 BRUCE K ANDERSON 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 217.65 BRUCE K ANDERSON 11/11/2004 RANDOLPH ROSE CLLCTN 4,150.00 BRUCE K ANDERSON 11/01/2004 BROWNELLS INC 90.10 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/01/2004 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS 60.71 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/05/2004 STREICHER'S POLICE EQP 1,472.90 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/03/2004 SNYDER DRUG #5073 13.88 MANDY ANZALDI 11/04/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 10.27 MANDY ANZALDI 11/01/2004 JOHN E REID & ASSOC INC 395.00 JOHN BANICK 11/01/2004 JOHN E REID & ASSOC INC 395.00 JOHN BANICK 11/02/2004 MN PHOTO 31.72 JOHN BANICK 11/05/2004 SHRED-IT 189.81 JOHN BANICK 11/05/2004 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROD 738.25 JOHN BANICK 11/08/2004 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL 154 795.30 JOHN BANICK 11/11/2004 DON' PAINT & BODY SHOP 1,996.72 JOHN BANICK 11/12/2004 LAMETTRY'S COLLISION 2,965.08 JOHN BANICK 11/12/2004 CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC 112.15 JIM BEHAN 11/12/2004 VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 45.46 JIM BEHAN 11/10/2004 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKL 6.66 OAKLEY BIESANZ 11/01/2004 KNOWLANS #2 6.60 RON BOURQUIN 11/01/2004 RAINBOW 1-8852 17.76 RON BOURQUIN 11/02/2004 GREEN MILL 82.07 RON BOURQUIN 11/03/2004 AUTOZONE #3082 17.02 RON BOURQUIN 11/10/2004 MENARDS 3059 28.24 ROGER BREHEIM 11/04/2004 KINKO'S #0617 41.00 HEIDI CAREY 11/10/2004 DGI DYNAMIC GRAPHICS 79.00 HEIDI CAREY 11/11/2004 KINKO'S #0617 42.17 HEIDI CAREY 11/01/2004 CENTURY COLLEGE CONTINUIN 195.00 STEVE CARLSON 11/12/2004 CRAMER BLDG SERVICES INC 535.00 STEVE CARLSON 11/12/2004 CENTURY COLLEGE CONTINUIN 60.00 STEVE CARLSON 11/03/2004 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVGS 445.88 CHRISTOPHER CAVETT 11/02/2004 GE CAPITAL 149.10 LINDA CROSSON 11/04/2004 WMS WASTE MGMT WMEZPAY 1,618.09 LINDA CROSSON 11/04/2004 MEDICAL RESOURCES 73.00 LINDA CROSSON 11/01/2004 STREICHERS POLICE EQUIPM 28.65 KERRY GROTTY 11/08/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 23.50 KERRY GROTTY 11/03/2004 PAPA JOHN'S # 00418384 27.04 ROBERTA DARST 11/10/2004 PANERA BREAD #3459 5.00 ROBERTA DARST 11/10/2004 CARIBOU COFFEE #155 25.00 ROBERTA DARST 11/10/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 160.71 ROBERTA DARST 11/01/2004 VALLEY TROPHY 206.84 RICHARD DOBLAR 11/03/2004 MN PHOTO 153.13 RICHARD DOBLAR 11/11/2004 ARBY'S #214 Q52 13.85 RICHARD DOBLAR 11/12/2004 EXCELLCOM 26.63 ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL 11/11/2004 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 14.16 ANDREW ENGSTROM 11/01/2004 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 3.81 PAUL E EVERSON 11/03/2004 WALGREEN 00073882 29.99 PAUL E EVERSON 11/03/2004 WALGREEN 00073882 29.99 PAUL E EVERSON 11/12/2004 VRZN WRLS VZSRVE W RE3 77.62 DANIEL F FAUST 11/05/2004 STREAMLINE DESIGN 462.00 GREG FINN 8 Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 11/05/2004 STREAMLINE DESIGN 833.00 GREG FINN 11/05/2004 STREAMLINE DESIGN 1,128.00 GREG FINN 11/01/2004 GYPSUM ASSOCIATION 15.50 DAVID FISHER 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 279.48 DAVID FISHER 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 691.38 DAVID FISHER 11/10/2004 EXCELLCOM 33.53 DAVID FISHER 11/04/2004 PRIORITY ELECTRONICS 97.99 MYCHAL FOWLDS 11/12/2004 PROSTAR COMPUTER INC 104.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS 11/12/2004 HP DIRECT -SMB 1,702.94 MYCHAL FOWLDS 11/01/2004 UPGRADE NATION INC 164.00 NICK FRANZEN 11/03/2004 OFFICE MAX 00002204 341.06 NICK FRANZEN 11/05/2004 SYX TIGERDIRECT.COM 627.49 NICK FRANZEN 11/08/2004 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137 63.89 NICK FRANZEN 11/10/2004 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137 101.15 NICK FRANZEN 11/11/2004 HP DIRECT -SMB 85.44 NICK FRANZEN 11/05/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 65.32 JOHN FRASER 11/01/2004 INTAB INC O1 OF O1 574.50 PATRICIA FRY 11/01/2004 INTAB INC O1 OF O1 619.11 PATRICIA FRY 11/01/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 192.50 PATRICIA FRY 11/01/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 84.96 PATRICIA FRY 11/02/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 107.82 PATRICIA FRY 11/03/2004 PANERA BREAD #3459 62.08 PATRICIA FRY 11/04/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 29.48 PATRICIA FRY 11/10/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 27.10 PATRICIA FRY 11/11/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 18.51 PATRICIA FRY 11/02/2004 SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC1 115.09 RICHARD FURSMAN 11/08/2004 BARNES & NOBLE #2786 37.28 RICHARD FURSMAN 11/08/2004 KNOWLANS #2 5.49 CAROLE GERNES 11/04/2004 MN PHOTO 6.08 CLARENCE GERVAIS 11/11/2004 ALERT ALL CORP 805.58 CLARENCE GERVAIS 11/01/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 59.82 MIKE GRAF 11/02/2004 TARGET 00011858 69.69 MIKE GRAF 11/08/2004 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 200.55 MIKE GRAF 11/08/2004 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC 23.93 MIKE GRAF 11/05/2004 NAT. SC. TEACHER ASSOC 30.15 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 11/12/2004 VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 63.81 KAREN E GUILFOILE 11/12/2004 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC. 50.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE 11/10/2004 WW GRAINGER 497 94.89 MARK HAAG 11/05/2004 BOLA CHICA INC. 176.99 LORI HANSON 11/12/2004 CALENDERS 45.89 LORI HANSON 11/12/2004 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSP 1,508.16 LORI HANSON 11/02/2004 RICHARDS MARKET INC 11.94 MICHAEL HEMQUIST 11/01/2004 HEJNY RENTALS INC 230.98 GARY HINNENKAMP 11/08/2004 HEJNY RENTALS INC 397.29 GARY HINNENKAMP 11/01/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 17.57 RON HORWATH 11/01/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 125.86 RON HORWATH 11/01/2004 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 157.28 STEVE HURLEY 11/10/2004 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 1,228.29 STEVE HURLEY 11/09/2004 KNOWLANS #2 34.80 ANN E HUTCHINSON 11/08/2004 EXCELLCOM 26.63 SCOTT JACOBSON 11/04/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 21.12 DAVID JAHN 11/05/2004 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 33.76 DAVID JAHN 11/08/2004 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 17.53 DAVID JAHN 11/11/2004 DOWNTOWNER CAR WASH 80.25 FLINT KARIS 11/01/2004 TARGET 00011858 85.19 MARY B KOEHNEN 11/04/2004 AMERICAN RED CROSS HS -61.00 MARY B KOEHNEN 9 Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 11/03/2004 GAL GALLS INC 49.98 BRETT KROLL 11/12/2004 CHILI'S GRI03000010306 8.00 DAVID KVAM 11/11/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 45.26 DANIEL CARSON 11/03/2004 VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 45.46 SHERYL L LE 11/01/2004 MENARDS 3022 17.00 DENNIS LINDORFF 11/01/2004 RAINBOW FOODS 1-886 524.19 STEVE LUKIN 11/02/2004 NORMS TIRE SALES, 256.20 STEVE LUKIN 11/08/2004 EAT INC 9.76 STEVE LUKIN 11/09/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 21.09 STEVE LUKIN 11/11/2004 METRO SALES INC O1 OF O1 227.00 STEVE LUKIN 11/11/2004 METRO SALES INC O1 OF O1 96.73 STEVE LUKIN 11/10/2004 MARATHON ASHLAND 035212 32.00 CORDON MALLORY 11/01/2004 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 539.00 MARK MARUSKA 11/03/2004 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT 54.15 MARK MARUSKA 11/04/2004 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 186.63 MARK MARUSKA 11/04/2004 MAUTZ #3525 120.00 MARK MARUSKA 11/08/2004 ON SITE SANITATION, IN 227.42 MARK MARUSKA 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 504.25 MARK MARUSKA 11/08/2004 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION 697.60 MARK MARUSKA 11/11/2004 LTG POWER EQUIPMENT 408.72 MARK MARUSKA 11/11/2004 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION 2,017.63 MARK MARUSKA 11/11/2004 HUNT ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1,459.07 MARK MARUSKA 11/01/2004 RAINBOW FOODS 1-885 38.06 JON A MELANDER 11/04/2004 NEXTEL STORES 30.66 JON A MELANDER 11/10/2004 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE 8.52 JON A MELANDER 11/10/2004 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY I 249.28 JON A MELANDER 11/10/2004 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTR 252.00 ED NADEAU 11/02/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 167.97 JEAN NELSON 11/12/2004 RYCO SUPPLY COMPANY 26.73 JEAN NELSON 11/12/2004 MINUTEMAN PRESS 777.83 JEAN NELSON 11/04/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 172.75 AMY NNEN 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 432.56 AMY NNEN 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 88.40 AMY NNEN 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 253.47 AMY NNEN 11/11/2004 USPS 2663650015 3.10 AMY NNEN 11/01/2004 HEJNY RENTALS INC 390.66 MICHAEL NOVAK 11/08/2004 HEJNY RENTALS INC 414.64 MICHAEL NOVAK 11/04/2004 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER 116.09 ERICK OSWALD 11/05/2004 OAKDALE RENTAL CENTER 137.39 ERICK OSWALD 11/12/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 77.00 STEVEN PALMA 11/04/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 17.55 KURT PARSONS 11/12/2004 PROPERTYKEY.COM, INC. 50.00 DENNIS PECK 11/03/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 53.59 KATHLEEN PECK HALL 11/01/2004 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 47.89 ROBERT PETERSON 11/01/2004 LASTAR.COM INC #1 28.74 PHILIP F POWELL 11/01/2004 PAYPAL SPYBOT SD 10.00 PHILIP F POWELL 11/04/2004 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 39.30 PHILIP F POWELL 11/09/2004 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137 63.89 PHILIP F POWELL 11/10/2004 SUPERAMERICA 4204 16.16 PHILIP F POWELL 11/10/2004 AMZ AMAZON PAYMENTS 61.90 PHILIP F POWELL 11/11/2004 CHARLES THOMAS PUBLISH 214.70 PHILIP F POWELL 11/11/2004 AMZ SUPERSTORE 11.20 PHILIP F POWELL 11/11/2004 AMZ SUPERSTORE 21.25 PHILIP F POWELL 11/01/2004 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY 252.46 STEVEN PRIEM 11/01/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 134.08 STEVEN PRIEM 11/01/2004 REEDS SALES AND SERVICE 13.96 STEVEN PRIEM 10 Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 11/01/2004 REEDS SALES AND SERVICE 12.64 STEVEN PRIEM 11/02/2004 TRI STATE BOBCAT 151.74 STEVEN PRIEM 11/02/2004 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 189.63 STEVEN PRIEM 11/02/2004 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 560.57 STEVEN PRIEM 11/02/2004 MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA 58.74 STEVEN PRIEM 11/03/2004 SUNRAY BTB 7.13 STEVEN PRIEM 11/05/2004 TRUCK UTILITES INC 51.51 STEVEN PRIEM 11/05/2004 TOUSLEY FORD I27200039 11.69 STEVEN PRIEM 11/05/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 159.58 STEVEN PRIEM 11/08/2004 COMO LUBE & SUPPLOI OF O1 104.09 STEVEN PRIEM 11/09/2004 WHITE BEAR DODGE 55.59 STEVEN PRIEM 11/09/2004 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 331.26 STEVEN PRIEM 11/09/2004 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO 51.44 STEVEN PRIEM 11/10/2004 TOUSLEY FORD I27200039 33.24 STEVEN PRIEM 11/10/2004 ZIEGLER INC -RETAIL 62.16 STEVEN PRIEM 11/10/2004 SUNRAY BTB 22.93 STEVEN PRIEM 11/10/2004 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 57.87 STEVEN PRIEM 11/10/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 48.03 STEVEN PRIEM 11/10/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 120.80 STEVEN PRIEM 11/11/2004 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,136.09 STEVEN PRIEM 11/12/2004 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP 91.80 STEVEN PRIEM 11/02/2004 BATTERIES PLUS 47.39 KEVIN RABBETT 11/08/2004 MRL 1,485.00 KEVIN RABBETT 11/10/2004 MENARDS 3059 66.65 KEVIN RABBETT 11/10/2004 BEST BUY 00000109 15.94 KEVIN RABBETT 11/08/2004 ADMINISTRATION RESOURCES 69.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 11/11/2004 PAYPAL PSTEGORA 121.50 TERRIE RAMEAUX 11/11/2004 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 285.27 MICHAEL REILLY 11/01/2004 TARGET 00006197 16.77 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/01/2004 TARGET 00011858 10.64 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/04/2004 WALGREEN 00029363 15.71 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/10/2004 MARCUS OAKD.CIN #488 Q25 14.50 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/10/2004 MARCUS OAKD.CIN #488 Q25 51.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/10/2004 WONDER/HOSTESS #63 12.46 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/11/2004 WALGREEN 00029363 7.00 AUDRA ROBBINS 11/01/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 184.40 DEB SCHMIDT 11/10/2004 DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 79.63 DEB SCHMIDT 11/10/2004 DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 226.37 DEB SCHMIDT 11/10/2004 CURTIS 1000 54.89 DEB SCHMIDT 11/11/2004 WWW.SPORTMART.COM 130.57 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT 11/12/2004 WWW.SPORTMART.COM 59.94 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT 11/01/2004 CAPITOL COMMUNICATION 101.65 SCOTT SCHULTZ 11/02/2004 T-MOBILE 47.05 SCOTT SCHULTZ 11/08/2004 G & K SERVICES 006 225.19 GERALD SEEGER 11/08/2004 MENARDS 3022 28.17 GERALD SEEGER 11/09/2004 MENARDS 3022 17.22 GERALD SEEGER 11/10/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 15.98 ANDREA SINDT 11/04/2004 TARGET 00006940 7.63 PAULINE STAPLES 11/05/2004 RAINBOW FOODS 1-886 32.47 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 11/05/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 167.73 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 11/05/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS -12.11 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 11/08/2004 RICHARDS MARKET INC 3.80 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 11/08/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 12.11 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 11/03/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 29.73 RONALD SVENDSEN 11/04/2004 NAPA AUTO PARTS # 28438 10.48 RONALD SVENDSEN 11/03/2004 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES COMPA 186.00 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 11 Post Date Vendor Name 11/08/2004 SEARS ROEBUCK 1122 11/11/2004 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 11/12/2004 WW GRAINGER 500 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/12/2004 WEBER & TROSETH INC 11/02/2004 T-MOBILE 11/08/2004 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/08/2004 QWESTCOMM TN612 11/05/2004 INT'L ASSN OF CHI01 OF O1 11/01/2004 RAINBOW FOODS 1-886 11/01/2004 RAINBOW FOODS 1-886 11/08/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 11/01/2004 CORPORATE MARK, INC 11/03/2004 QUILL CORPORATION 11/03/2004 FREDPRYOR/CAREERTRACK 11/05/2004 VIKING #1090 11/12/2004 VIKING #1090 Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 35.45 LYLE SWANSON 88.06 LYLE SWANSON 90.27 LYLE SWANSON 77.75 LYLE SWANSON 174.50 LYLE SWANSON 387.50 LYLE SWANSON 303.70 LYLE SWANSON 491.35 LYLE SWANSON 160.40 LYLE SWANSON 327.08 LYLE SWANSON 128.00 LYLE SWANSON 105.59 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 91.22 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 57.51 JUDY TETZLAFF 57.51 JUDY TETZLAFF 57.51 JUDY TETZLAFF 86.27 JUDY TETZLAFF 86.27 JUDY TETZLAFF 86.27 JUDY TETZLAFF 86.27 JUDY TETZLAFF 115.02 JUDY TETZLAFF 237.24 JUDY TETZLAFF 368.52 JUDY TETZLAFF 100.00 DAVID J THOMALLA 8.07 JOSEPH WATERS 21.33 JOSEPH WATERS 62.65 KAO XIONG 328.72 SUSAN ZWIEG 65.24 SUSAN ZWIEG -49.00 SUSAN ZWIEG -1.58 SUSAN ZWIEG 68.05 SUSAN ZWIEG 56,746.88 12 Check Register City of Maplewood vchlist 12/03/2004 11:04:36 AM Check Date Vendor 65593 12/7/2004 02347 65594 12/7/2004 01981 65595 12/7/2004 02733 65596 12/7/2004 00174 65597 12/7/2004 00198 65598 12/7/2004 01922 65599 12/7/2004 00216 65600 12/7/2004 02929 65601 12/7/2004 00309 65602 12/7/2004 03281 65603 12/7/2004 02917 65604 12/7/2004 00460 65605 12/7/2004 00242 65606 12/7/2004 00384 65607 12/7/2004 00384 65608 12/7/2004 00412 65609 12/7/2004 00522 65610 12/7/2004 00529 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER ARM OF MN BELDE,STAN BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS BREHEIM, ROGER BRIGGS & MORGAN, P.A. C NAG LAC COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION CORBETT, CAITLIN CORBETT, HEIDI CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS NORTH CWH RESEARCH, INC. DE LACE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS DE LACE LANDEN FINANCIAL SRVS DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES FOIX, BEA FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO 65611 12/7/2004 00585 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL 65612 12/7/2004 03262 HENNEPIN CHIEF'S ASSN 65613 12/7/2004 00668 HIEBERT, STEVEN 65614 12/7/2004 02506 HUNT ELECTRIC CORP 65615 12/7/2004 00489 INTEREUM INC 65616 12/7/2004 00708 65617 12/7/2004 00891 65618 12/7/2004 00935 65619 12/7/2004 02330 65620 12/7/2004 02872 65621 12/7/2004 00985 65622 12/7/2004 00986 65623 12/7/2004 02425 65624 12/7/2004 01022 65625 12/3/2004 01044 65626 12/7/2004 01085 65627 12/7/2004 01160 65628 12/7/2004 01961 65629 12/7/2004 00001 65630 12/7/2004 00001 65631 12/7/2004 00001 65632 12/7/2004 00001 65633 12/7/2004 00001 65634 12/7/2004 00001 65635 12/7/2004 00001 65636 12/7/2004 00001 65637 12/7/2004 01337 65638 12/7/2004 01391 65639 12/7/2004 01418 IPMA MN CHAPTER ADMIN MAMA MAPLEWOOD FIRE FIGHTERS RELIEF METEORLOGIX, LLC METLIFE SBC METROPOLITAN COUNCIL METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MN APCO MN CITY COUNTY MGMT ASSN MN FIRE SERVICE CERT BD MN LIFE INSURANCE NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR ONE TIME VENDOR RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV ROTO-ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY SAM'S CLUB DIRECT Description/Account LAKES CHAPTER EDUCATION - 12/16 SPECTRACOM TIME SERVER MN DOT CERT TRNG K-9 HANDLER -DEC MONTHLY WATER UTIL -DATED 11/23/04 PERS CELL PHONE USAGE -DEC SERIES 20046 -IMP BONDS SERIES 2004C -ABATEMENT BONDS SERIES 2004D -CAPITAL BONDS SERIES 2004E - MSA BONDS LONG TERM CARE INS MN DOT CERT TRNG BUILDING SUPERVISION - HAZELWOOD BUILDING SUPERVISION - HAZELWOOD COVER LAW ENFORCEMENT WRITTEN TESTS COPIER LEASE COPIER LEASE EFFECTIVE MGMT PROG BOOKS WREATHS MONTHLY LTD PREM STD PLAN 4043120-0-1 DEC BILLABLE LOCATE TICKETS - 444 COURSE FEE 10/22 K-9 HANDLER -DEC INSTALL AISLE LIGHTING INSTALL STATIONARY PEDESTALS DELIVERY OF LATERAL FILE IPMA MN MEMBERSHIP MAMA/APMP LUNCHEON - 2 2004 CONTRIBUTION WEATHER SATELLITE SUBSCRIPTION MONTHLY DENTAL PREMIUM WASTEWATER -DEC MONTHLY SAC - SEP APCO CONF REGISTRATION - 3 MEMBERSHIP DUES 5/1 - 4/30/05 FIRE FIGHTER 2 CERT TEST - 9 MONTHLY PREMIUM PROJ 02-07 SIGNING WIRELESS SERVICES 10/11 - 11/09 REF TIMCO CONS-DUP PYMT SAC & WAC REF JAMES MOSER -MEMBERSHIP REF MARY STROEING -MCC PROG REF JOZSEF HEGEDUS -MEMBERSHIP REF KRISTIN JACOBSON -MCC PROG REF ERIKA SODERBECK -MEMBERSHIP REF TOM COLOSIMO -RECORDING FEE REF KIM BERGTHOLD -MCC PROG 215 LARPENTEUR TAXES-ID182922430022 SEWER DRAIN SERVICE PROGRAM SUPPLIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES MERCH FOR RESALE MERCH FOR RESALE PROGRAM SUPPLIES Amount 60.00 2,381.93 250.00 35.00 766.05 15.00 7,570.00 6,020.00 3,520.00 6,040.00 819.32 250.00 252.00 252.00 394.63 1,785.00 511.20 161.88 152.19 220.00 2,096.96 1,325.72 510.60 75.00 35.00 1,850.00 60.17 50.06 15.00 60.00 191,036.00 1,886.70 7,618.11 183,923.93 20,047.50 450.00 93.00 495.00 3,951.53 1,848.86 2,095.47 3,000.00 226.97 75.00 66.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 572.00 689.00 88.07 63.11 147.46 130.94 257.52 13 Check Date Vendor 65640 65641 65642 65643 65644 65645 12/7/2004 03138 SHOCK ME APPAREL 12/7/2004 02515 ST CROIX LESSON CENTER 12/7/2004 01618 THOMALLA, DAVID 12/7/2004 03282 TOWNHOMES OF PINEVIEW ESTATES 12/7/2004 01709 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL 12/7/2004 03194 VERNIX FORESTRY CONSULTANTS 53 Checks in this report Description/Account Amount VENDING MACHINES SUPPLIES 246.50 MERCH FOR RESALE 134.96 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 152.43 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 256.32 25TH ANNIVERSARY SHIRTS 448.50 HORSE RIDING LESSON INSTRUCTOR 1,140.00 REIMB FOR MEALS 11/15 - 11/16 53.35 PROJ 02-07 CTY RD D EASEMENTS 26,425.00 RUBBISH REMOVAL 1,356.00 CITY FORESTER 10/16 - 11/22 214.98 Total checks : 486,794.92 14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Disbursements via Debits to Checking account Transmitted Settlement Date Date Payee 11 /23/04 11/19/04 11 /24/04 11 /23/04 11 /24/04 11 /29/04 11 /30/04 12/01 /04 12/01 /04 12/01 /04 12/01 /04 11 /26/04 11 /24/04 11 /24/04 11 /26/04 11 /26/04 01 /29/04 11 /30/04 12/01 /04 12/01 /04 12/01 /04 12/01 /04 12/02/04 12/03/04 MN State Treasurer WI Dept of Revenue MN State Treasurer ARC Administration MN Dept of Natural Resources MN State Treasurer MN State Treasurer U.S. Bank Trust Citigroup Dain Rauscher MN State Treasurer Elan Financial Services* TOTAL Description Drivers License/Deputy Registrar State Payroll Tax Drivers License/Deputy Registrar DCRP & Flex plan payments DNR electronic licenses Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Drivers License/Deputy Registrar Debt Service Payment Investment Purchase Investment Purchase Drivers License/Deputy Registrar *Detailed listings of Elan purchasing card items are attached. Amount 13,575.52 1,298.25 12,100.00 1,063.93 141.00 10,197.89 20,992.05 134,707.50 1,747,609.86 498,891.67 15,469.45 38,263.67 ~,4a4,3 i u. i a 15 Transaction Review 11 / 3 0/ 2 0 0 4 For Transactions posted between 11/13/2004 to 11/26/2004 Post Date Vendor Name Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 11/22/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 39.35 GLINT ABEL 11/24/2004 SPRINTPCS-CUSTCAREPMT 30.00 BRUCE K ANDERSON 11/24/2004 SPRINTPCS-CUSTCAREPMT 30.00 BRUCE K ANDERSON 11/16/2004 MILLS FLEET FARM #27 42.60 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/22/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 374.03 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/22/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 60.65 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/24/2004 GAL GALLS INC 858.39 SCOTT ANDREWS 11/18/2004 TCT M&N INTERNATIONAL 15.24 MANDY ANZALDI 11/19/2004 THEATRE HOUSE 22.85 MANDY ANZALDI 11/15/2004 MATRX MEDICAL 881.44 JOHN BANICK 11/15/2004 LAMETTRY'S COLLISION 927.18 JOHN BANICK 11/18/2004 MPLS COMMUNITY & TECH COL 200.00 JOHN BANICK 11/19/2004 KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC. 3,666.58 JOHN BANICK 11/19/2004 SHRED-IT 119.88 11/22/2004 MARSHALL FLDS 00020172 316.00 JOHN BANICK 11/19/2004 WW GRAINGER 500 80.13 JIM BEHAN 11/26/2004 PET'S PLUS 41.94 OAKLEY BIESANZ 11/16/2004 MENARDS 3059 36.92 ROGER BREHEIM 11/17/2004 MENARDS 3059 19.04 ROGER BREHEIM 11/22/2004 PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI 8.30 ROGER BREHEIM 11/16/2004 RED WING SHOE STORE #0 164.99 TROY BRINK 11/23/2004 MENARDS 3059 60.67 TROY BRINK 11/18/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 46.99 HEIDI CAREY 11/22/2004 KINKO'S #0617 82.01 HEIDI CAREY 11/22/2004 OFFICE MAX 00002204 22.49 STEVE CARLSON 11/24/2004 OFFICE MAX 00002204 76.41 STEVE CARLSON 11/16/2004 VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 29.24 CHRISTOPHER CAVETT 11/19/2004 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC 135.50 KEVIN COFFEY 11/18/2004 SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 30.00 ROBERTA DARST 11/22/2004 CUB FOODS-SUN RAY 23.70 ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL 11/26/2004 CORPORATE MARK, INC 536.12 ROBERT J DOLLERSCHELL 11/26/2004 EXCELLCOM 85.18 JOHN DUCHARME 11/23/2004 MENARDS 3059 28.31 DAVE EDSON 11/26/2004 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 6.51 PAUL E EVERSON 11/22/2004 BACHMANS MAPLEWD 004 63.88 SHANN FINWALL 11/15/2004 WASTE MANAGEMENT 332.82 DAVID FISHER 11/15/2004 WASTE MANAGEMENT 332.82 DAVID FISHER 11/15/2004 EXCELLCOM 42.15 DAVID FISHER 11/17/2004 GLENWOOD-INGLEWOOD 106.34 DAVID FISHER 11/22/2004 ALL MAIN STREET ELECTRIC 643.65 DAVID FISHER 11/15/2004 OFFICE MAX 00002204 38.33 MYCHAL FOWLDS 11/18/2004 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 38.76 MYCHAL FOWLDS 11/19/2004 HP DIRECT - SMB 68.85 NICK FRANZEN 11/26/2004 SYX TIGERDIRECT.COM 927.48 NICK FRANZEN 11/26/2004 SYX TIGERDIRECT.COM 927.48 NICK FRANZEN 11/26/2004 CL MICROSOFT DMR 47.88 NICK FRANZEN 11/16/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 62.12 PATRICIA FRY 11/16/2004 PAKOR INC 409.69 PATRICIA FRY 11/19/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 13.32 PATRICIA FRY 11/26/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 52.46 PATRICIA FRY 11/17/2004 CUB FOODS, INC. 8.47 CAROLE GERNES 11/15/2004 GANDER MOUNTAIN 69.99 CLARENCE GERVAIS 16 Post Date Vendor Name 11 / 16/2004 11/26/2004 11 / 16/2004 11/26/2004 11 /22/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /24/2004 11/26/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /22/2004 11/26/2004 11 /24/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 /22/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /24/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 /22/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 18/2004 11 / 15/2004 11/26/2004 11/26/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 /22/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /24/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /22/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 /22/2004 11 /24/2004 11/26/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 /22/2004 11 / 18/2004 11 / 16/2004 11/26/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 /24/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 17/2004 U OF M- CCE OFFICE MAX 00002204 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS MENARDS 3059 CUB FOODS, INC. TARGET 00011858 INT'L INST OF MUNI CLE METRO SALES INC O1 OF O1 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT STREICHERS POLICE EQUIPM BROOK WHITE-180 MENARDS 3022 AMERICAN RED CROSOI OF O1 NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE WAL MART HEJNY RENTALS INC UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC OFFICE MAX 00002204 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC WORLD FOOTLOCKER #5032 WORLD FOOTLOCKER #5032 WORLD FOOTLOCKER #5032 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC FRATTALLONE'S ACE HDWE NEXTEL WIRELESS SVCS WASTE MANAGEMENT VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 3M RESOURCE RECOVERY AMERITECH MOBILE PA EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT WASTE MANAGEMENT VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 ARCH WIRELESS SPRINTPCS AUTOPYMT RC1 MENARDS 3022 DEMCO INC S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS QWEST COMMUNICATION QWEST COMMUNICATION APCO INTERNATIONAL THE UPS STORE #2171 TARGET 00011858 WALGREEN 00016873 Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 140.00 CLARENCE GERVAIS 31.02 CLARENCE GERVAIS 162.18 JEAN GLASS 453.96 JEAN GLASS 42.59 MIKE GRAF 10.58 MIKE GRAF 15.96 MIKE GRAF 125.00 KAREN E GUILFOILE 1,460.92 LORI HANSEN 67.63 LORI HANSON 15.95 LORI HANSON 22.72 MICHAEL HEMQUIST 54.78 STEVEN HIEBERT 115.56 GARY HINNENKAMP 9.31 GARY HINNENKAMP 311.40 RON HORWATH 52.22 STEVE HURLEY 186.29 STEVE HURLEY 38.78 ANN E HUTCHINSON 140.53 ANN E HUTCHINSON 18.46 DAVID JAHN 85.20 KEVIN JOHNSON 635.20 DON JONES 57.85 FLINT KARIS 33.99 MARY B KOEHNEN 37.81 TOMMY KONG 70.00 DAVID KVAM -70.00 DAVID KVAM 59.99 DAVID KVAM 7.40 DANIEL CARSON 601.42 MICHAEL LIDBERG 581.49 MICHAEL LIDBERG 27.70 MICHAEL LIDBERG 776.57 STEVE LUKIN 263.33 STEVE LUKIN 90.34 STEVE LUKIN 217.21 STEVE LUKIN 17.61 STEVE LUKIN 1,018.97 STEVE LUKIN 427.42 STEVE LUKIN 732.01 MARK MARUSKA 8.73 MARK MARUSKA 15.52 JON A MELANDER 50.00 ALESIA METRY 61.57 ED NADEAU 37.46 ED NADEAU 66.46 BRYAN NAGEL 3.11 JOHN NAUGHTON 383.23 JEAN NELSON 61.21 AMY NIVEN 629.00 MARSHA PACOLT 673.00 MARSHA PACOLT 80.00 MARSHA PACOLT 9.05 KURT PARSONS 31.92 KURT PARSONS 179.98 KURT PARSONS 17 Post Date Vendor Name 11/22/2004 MOORE MEDICAL 11/23/2004 WALGREEN 00016873 11/24/2004 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE 11/15/2004 PAGE COMPUTER INC 11/15/2004 IMS PLUS 11/17/2004 FITZCOINC 11/18/2004 PWP TRAINING PROD 11/22/2004 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137 11/24/2004 MEMORY SUPPLIERS, INC 11/26/2004 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3137 11/26/2004 RITZ CAMERA #396 11/18/2004 CINTAS FIRST AID #0431 11/26/2004 THE STAR TRIBUNE-CIRCULAT 11/26/2004 OFFICE MAX 00011205 11/15/2004 KREMER SPRING AND ALIGNME 11/15/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 11/16/2004 PAM OIL INC 11/17/2004 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP 11/17/2004 SUNRAY BTB 11/17/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 11/19/2004 MERIT CHEVROLET 11/18/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 11/19/2004 EAT INC 11/19/2004 SUNRAY BTB 11/19/2004 GENERATOR SPECIALTY CO 11/22/2004 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC 11/22/2004 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT IN 11/23/2004 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 11/23/2004 NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT 11/24/2004 AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS-MN 11/26/2004 UNITED SUPPLY CORP 11/26/2004 SUNRAY BTB 11/26/2004 BAUER BULT TRE33200023 11/26/2004 KATH AUTO PARTS 11/26/2004 SUNRAY BTB 11/24/2004 CONOCO 11/24/2004 RADISSON HOTELS 11/17/2004 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNC 11/22/2004 PIONEER PRESS ADVERTISIN 11/15/2004 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 11/15/2004 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 11/18/2004 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 11/17/2004 MENARDS 3059 11/17/2004 AMERICAN RED CROSOI OF O1 11/15/2004 MILLS FLEET FARM #27 11/15/2004 MENARDS 3022 11/16/2004 MENARDS 3022 11/18/2004 HIRSHFIELD'S MAPLEWOOD 11/22/2004 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 11/19/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 11/22/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 11/24/2004 S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS 11/26/2004 CURTIS 1000 11/23/2004 WRISTBANDS MEDTECH USA IN 11/18/2004 YOCUM OIL COMPANY 11/16/2004 VERIZON WRLS I2KW RE3 Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 114.44 KURT PARSONS 10.54 ROBERT PETERSON 28.30 ROBERT PETERSON 154.69 PHILIP F POWELL 555.94 PHILIP F POWELL 231.63 PHILIP F POWELL 67.95 PHILIP F POWELL 53.24 PHILIP F POWELL 80.95 PHILIP F POWELL 10.95 PHILIP F POWELL 47.88 PHILIP F POWELL 38.55 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 112.58 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 15.96 WILLIAM J PRIEFER 162.09 STEVEN PRIEM 157.76 STEVEN PRIEM 364.23 STEVEN PRIEM -88.50 STEVEN PRIEM 32.56 STEVEN PRIEM 42.01 STEVEN PRIEM 25.49 STEVEN PRIEM 22.60 STEVEN PRIEM 50.62 STEVEN PRIEM 184.85 STEVEN PRIEM 219.90 STEVEN PRIEM 71.56 STEVEN PRIEM 64.41 STEVEN PRIEM 560.57 STEVEN PRIEM 170.39 STEVEN PRIEM 317.96 STEVEN PRIEM 165.18 STEVEN PRIEM 181.96 STEVEN PRIEM 535.76 STEVEN PRIEM 143.42 STEVEN PRIEM 4.49 STEVEN PRIEM 24.99 KEVIN RABBETT 114.75 KEVIN RABBETT 195.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 547.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX 935.70 MICHAEL REILLY 48.03 MICHAEL REILLY 1,021.73 MICHAEL REILLY 47.87 MICHAEL REILLY 93.50 AUDRA ROBBINS 60.99 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 97.87 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 14.68 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 138.41 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 19.18 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 194.37 DEB SCHMIDT 13.42 DEB SCHMIDT -11.82 DEB SCHMIDT 45.88 DEB SCHMIDT 495.75 RUSSELL L SCHMIDT 54.24 SCOTT SCHULTZ 45.46 ANDREA SINDT 18 Post Date Vendor Name 11 / 16/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 16/2004 11/26/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /24/2004 11 /24/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 /24/2004 11/26/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 /22/2004 11 /24/2004 11/26/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 /22/2004 11 /22/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 16/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 / 19/2004 11/23/2004 11 /22/2004 11/23/2004 11 / 17/2004 11 / 15/2004 11 / 19/2004 11 /22/2004 U OF M- CCE U OF M- CCE U OF M- CCE S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC S & T OFFICE PRODUCTS HEALTHEAST TRANSPORTATN ASPEN MILLS 8005717343 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS EAT INC BATTERIES PLUS DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC EXCELLCOM FOREST PRODUCTS SUPPLY MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER DAYTON'S COMME00000992 QWESTCOMM TN651 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 YANKEE DOODLES LA TAXI COOP INC ARAMARK LOS ANGELES CONV CORAS COFFEE SHOPPE ARAMARK LOS ANGELES CONV P.F. CHANG'S #5700 THE SIDEWALK CAFE INC LA TAXI COOP INC MARRIOTT LE MERIGOT MARRIOTT LE MERIGOT FIREHOUSE SUBSCRI01 OF O1 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC ROS RELIABLE OFFICE SU PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTI Settlement Amt Cardholder Name 210.00 ANDREA SINDT 160.00 ANDREA SINDT 170.00 ANDREA SINDT 75.16 ANDREA SINDT 280.52 SCOTT STEFFEN 392.79 SCOTT STEFFEN 76.56 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 254.71 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 206.80 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 149.10 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 21.00 RUSTIN SVENDSEN 14.90 LYLE SWANSON 263.54 LYLE SWANSON 38.33 LYLE SWANSON 111.82 LYLE SWANSON 96.79 LYLE SWANSON 58.58 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 345.85 JUDY TETZLAFF 122.61 TODD TEVLIN 22.43 DAVID J THOMALLA 29.00 DAVID J THOMALLA 9.74 DAVID J THOMALLA 12.75 DAVID J THOMALLA 11.37 DAVID J THOMALLA 21.68 DAVID J THOMALLA 14.00 DAVID J THOMALLA 34.40 DAVID J THOMALLA 990.35 DAVID J THOMALLA 26.64 DAVID J THOMALLA 28.00 JOSEPH WATERS 136.23 KAO XIONG 37.09 SUSAN ZWIEG 8.30 SUSAN ZWIEG 38,263.67 19 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 11/19/04 CARDINAL, ROBERT 406.78 dd 11/19/04 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 358.00 dd 11/19/04 KOPPEN, MARVIN 358.00 dd 11/19/04 MONAHAN-JUNEK, JACQUELINE 358.00 dd 11/19/04 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 358.00 dd 11/19/04 COLEMAN, MELINDA 3,792.87 dd 11/19/04 DARST, ROBERTA 1,540.63 dd 11/19/04 FURSMAN, RICHARD 4,629.25 dd 11/19/04 SWANSON, LYLE 1,614.49 dd 11/19/04 LE, SHERYL 3,699.76 dd 11/19/04 2,257.63 dd 11/19/04 FAUST, DANIEL 3,857.97 dd 11/19/04 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 1,413.24 dd 11/19/04 ANDERSON, CAROLE 862.15 dd 11/19/04 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,072.70 dd 11/19/04 JACKSON, MARY 1,766.85 dd 11/19/04 KELSEY, CONNIE 1,147.90 dd 11/19/04 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,766.84 dd 11/19/04 FRY, PATRICIA 1,931.27 dd 11/19/04 GUILFOILE, KAREN 2,701.07 dd 11/19/04 OSTER, ANDREA 1,884.95 dd 11/19/04 CARLE, JEANETTE 1,778.87 dd 11/19/04 FIGG, SHERRIE 1,064.43 dd 11/19/04 JAGOE, CAROL 1,786.08 dd 11/19/04 JOHNSON, BONNIE 872.35 dd 11/19/04 MOY, PAMELA 771.15 dd 11/19/04 OLSON, SANDRA 1,463.12 dd 11/19/04 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,725.35 dd 11/19/04 BANICK, JOHN 3,445.97 dd 11/19/04 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,813.98 dd 11/19/04 POWELL, PHILIP 2,156.41 dd 11/19/04 SPANGLER, EDNA 594.00 dd 11/19/04 THOMALLA, DAVID 3,817.59 dd 11/19/04 ABEL, GLINT 1,911.42 dd 11/19/04 ALDRIDGE, MARK 2,318.00 dd 11/19/04 ANDREWS, SCOTT 4,009.28 dd 11/19/04 BAKKE, LONN 2,415.68 dd 11/19/04 BELDE, STANLEY 2,745.44 dd 11/19/04 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 2,068.86 dd 11/19/04 BOHL, JOHN 3,321.66 dd 11/19/04 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,299.27 dd 11/19/04 COFFEY, KEVIN 2,191.22 dd 11/19/04 GROTTY, KERRY 2,381.85 dd 11/19/04 DOBLAR, RICHARD 4,177.05 dd 11/19/04 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 1,573.60 dd 11/19/04 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,756.82 dd 11/19/04 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,699.65 dd 11/19/04 JOHNSON, KEVIN 4,374.18 dd 11/19/04 KARIS, FLINT 2,904.81 dd 11/19/04 KONG, TOMMY 2,600.53 20 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 11/19/04 KROLL, BRETT 2,330.93 dd 11/19/04 KVAM, DAVID 3,063.63 dd 11/19/04 CARSON, DANIEL 2,735.76 dd 11/19/04 LU, JOHNNIE 2,330.93 dd 11/19/04 MARINO, JASON 2,465.45 dd 11/19/04 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,773.76 dd 11/19/04 MCCARTY, GLEN 1,767.81 dd 11/19/04 METRY, ALESIA 2,250.66 dd 11/19/04 NYE, MICHAEL 1,552.39 dd 11/19/04 OLSON, JULIE 2,555.59 dd 11/19/04 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,249.86 dd 11/19/04 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,564.93 dd 11/19/04 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 1,552.39 dd 11/19/04 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,672.29 dd 11/19/04 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,830.50 dd 11/19/04 WENZEL, JAY 2,569.32 dd 11/19/04 XIONG, KAO 2,114.31 dd 11/19/04 BARTZ, PAUL 2,996.31 dd 11/19/04 BERGERON, JOSEPH 3,430.00 dd 11/19/04 DUGAS, MICHAEL 2,226.18 dd 11/19/04 DUNN, ALICE 2,639.59 dd 11/19/04 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,430.03 dd 11/19/04 EVERSON, PAUL 1,996.41 dd 11/19/04 FLOR, TIMOTHY 4,229.40 dd 11/19/04 FRASER, JOHN 2,638.92 dd 11/19/04 L'ALLIER, DANIEL 1,867.73 dd 11/19/04 LANGNER, SCOTT 1,875.52 dd 11/19/04 PALMA, STEVEN 2,660.58 dd 11/19/04 PARSONS, KURT 2,232.37 dd 11/19/04 THIENES, PAUL 2,738.33 dd 11/19/04 DAWSON, RICHARD 1,829.73 dd 11/19/04 DUELLMAN, KIRK 1,869.01 dd 11/19/04 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 1,790.44 dd 11/19/04 NOVAK, JEROME 1,875.56 dd 11/19/04 PETERSON, ROBERT 1,901.63 dd 11/19/04 SVENDSEN, RONALD 1,867.44 dd 11/19/04 GERVAIS-JR, CLARENCE 2,575.00 dd 11/19/04 BAUER, MICHELLE 2,301.59 dd 11/19/04 FLAUGHER, JAYME 2,095.09 dd 11/19/04 HERMANSON, CHAD 1,039.13 dd 11/19/04 JACKSON, LINDA 1,815.16 dd 11/19/04 LAFFERTY, WALTER 2,111.63 dd 11/19/04 LINK, BRYAN 1,848.11 dd 11/19/04 PACOLT, MARSHA 2,238.81 dd 11/19/04 RABINE, JANET 2,001.38 dd 11/19/04 STAHNKE, JULIE 2,017.92 dd 11/19/04 LUKIN, STEVEN 3,487.99 dd 11/19/04 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 2,798.30 dd 11/19/04 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,710.85 dd 11/19/04 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 266.30 dd 11/19/04 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,045.84 dd 11/19/04 NNEN, AMY 1,147.53 dd 11/19/04 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,462.94 dd 11/19/04 WEGWERTH, JUDITH 1,902.79 dd 11/19/04 BRINK, TROY 1,572.84 dd 11/19/04 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1,796.04 21 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 11/19/04 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,824.05 dd 11/19/04 JONES, DONALD 1,796.04 dd 11/19/04 KANE, MICHAEL 2,748.86 dd 11/19/04 LUTZ, DAVID 1,808.50 dd 11/19/04 MEYER, GERALD 1,857.33 dd 11/19/04 NAGEL, BRYAN 1,961.87 dd 11/19/04 OSWALD, ERICK 1,961.87 dd 11/19/04 TEVLIN, TODD 1,752.90 dd 11/19/04 CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER 3,056.22 dd 11/19/04 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,277.07 dd 11/19/04 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,523.64 dd 11/19/04 JACOBSON, SCOTT 1,453.25 dd 11/19/04 LABEREE, ERIN 2,166.04 dd 11/19/04 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,277.07 dd 11/19/04 MURRA, AARON 278.30 dd 11/19/04 PECK, DENNIS 2,534.65 dd 11/19/04 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 2,279.29 dd 11/19/04 VERMEERSCH, CHARLES 2,065.24 dd 11/19/04 ANDERSON, BRUCE 3,764.03 dd 11/19/04 CAREY, HEIDI 1,952.44 dd 11/19/04 HALL, KATHLEEN 1,715.30 dd 11/19/04 MARUSKA, MARK 2,513.20 dd 11/19/04 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,622.04 dd 11/19/04 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,788.27 dd 11/19/04 BIESANZ, OAKI,EY 1,308.79 dd 11/19/04 HAYMAN, JANET 1,059.81 dd 11/19/04 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,092.14 dd 11/19/04 NELSON, JEAN 1,019.00 dd 11/19/04 SEEGER, GERALD 557.27 dd 11/19/04 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 1,918.04 dd 11/19/04 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 2,740.62 dd 11/19/04 KROLL, LISA 1,149.80 dd 11/19/04 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,027.44 dd 11/19/04 LORSUNG, ROSE 605.00 dd 11/19/04 SINDT, ANDREA 1,554.04 dd 11/19/04 THOMPSON, DEBRA 949.95 dd 11/19/04 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,453.24 dd 11/19/04 FINWALL, SHANN 2,126.04 dd 11/19/04 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,581.21 dd 11/19/04 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,561.82 dd 11/19/04 FISHER, DAVID 3,022.43 dd 11/19/04 MENNENGA, JOHN 420.00 dd 11/19/04 RICE, MICHAEL 1,810.04 dd 11/19/04 SWAN, DAVID 1,898.04 dd 11/19/04 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 2,548.44 dd 11/19/04 ANZALDI, KALI 430.13 dd 11/19/04 BJORK, ALICIA 249.50 dd 11/19/04 FINN, GREGORY 2,011.89 dd 11/19/04 GRAF, MICHAEL 1,813.14 dd 11/19/04 KELLY, LISA 1,273.02 dd 11/19/04 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 240.63 dd 11/19/04 ROBBINS, AUDRA 1,872.13 dd 11/19/04 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 268.38 dd 11/19/04 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,639.27 dd 11/19/04 WERNER, KATIE 297.50 dd 11/19/04 BREHEIM, ROGER 1,790.49 22 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 11/19/04 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,794.93 dd 11/19/04 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1,786.04 dd 11/19/04 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,046.73 dd 11/19/04 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,135.26 dd 11/19/04 COLEMAN, PHILIP 310.00 dd 11/19/04 COLLINS, ASHLEY 123.20 dd 11/19/04 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 184.80 dd 11/19/04 CROSSON, LINDA 2,338.51 dd 11/19/04 KAZISTOVA, ALEKSANDRA 199.80 dd 11/19/04 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 562.97 dd 11/19/04 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 1,790.55 dd 11/19/04 STAPLES, PAULINE 2,720.85 dd 11/19/04 BENDTSEN, LISA 179.10 dd 11/19/04 BRENEMAN, NEIL 313.85 dd 11/19/04 ERICKSON-CLARK, CAROL 89.00 dd 11/19/04 FONTAINE, KIM 792.66 dd 11/19/04 GREDVIG, ANDERS 354.14 dd 11/19/04 HORWATH, RONALD 1,783.14 dd 11/19/04 IRISH, GRACE 77.70 dd 11/19/04 JONES, LACEY 45.50 dd 11/19/04 KOEHNEN, AMY 48.30 dd 11/19/04 KOEHNEN, MARY 1,065.70 dd 11/19/04 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 424.70 dd 11/19/04 MATHEWS, LEAH 26.00 dd 11/19/04 MURDOCK, ELIAS 284.75 dd 11/19/04 NELSON, SIERRA 87.75 dd 11/19/04 OVERBY, ANNA 38.60 dd 11/19/04 POTTRATZ, DIANE 36.03 dd 11/19/04 SCHMIDT, LINDSEY 19.50 dd 11/19/04 SHAW, KRISTINA 169.93 dd 11/19/04 SMITH, ANN 198.00 dd 11/19/04 TUPY, HEIDE 174.60 dd 11/19/04 TUPY, MARCUS 326.60 dd 11/19/04 GROPPOLI, LINDA 387.00 dd 11/19/04 KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE 36.75 dd 11/19/04 BEHAN, JAMES 1,747.08 dd 11/19/04 LONETTI, JAMES 987.33 dd 11/19/04 MILES, LAURA 184.18 dd 11/19/04 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,023.72 dd 11/19/04 PRINS, KELLY 915.33 dd 11/19/04 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,549.24 dd 11/19/04 STEINHORST, JEFFREY 86.80 dd 11/19/04 AICHELE, CRAIG 1,830.04 dd 11/19/04 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,026.86 dd 11/19/04 BERGO, CHAD 2,071.54 dd 11/19/04 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 1,850.70 dd 11/19/04 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 1,483.20 dd 11/19/04 HURLEY, STEPHEN 3,049.62 dd 11/19/04 ARNOLD, DAVID ######### dd 11/19/04 BECKER, RONALD ######### dd 11/19/04 BURKE, MYLES ######### dd 11/19/04 CAHANES, ANTHONY ######### dd 11/19/04 CLAUSON, DALE ######### dd 11/19/04 DREGER, RICHARD ######### dd 11/19/04 EDSON, KAREN ######### dd 11/19/04 ELIAS, JAMES ######### 23 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 11/19/04 HALWEG, KEVIN ######### dd 11/19/04 MARTINSON, CAROL ######### dd 11/19/04 MEEHAN, JAMES ######### dd 11/19/04 MELANDER, JON ######### dd 11/19/04 MOESCHTER, RICHARD ######### dd 11/19/04 MORELLI, RAYMOND ######### dd 11/19/04 NELSON, CAROL ######### dd 11/19/04 OSTROM, MARJORIE ######### dd 11/19/04 RYAN, MICHAEL ######### dd 11/19/04 SKALMAN, DON ######### dd 11/19/04 STAFNE, GREG ######### dd 11/19/04 STOCKTON, DERRELL ######### dd 11/19/04 SVENDSEN, BRANDON ######### dd 11/19/04 URBANSKI, HOLLY ######### dd 11/19/04 VIETOR, LORRAINE ######### dd 11/19/04 VORWERK, ROBERT ######### wf 99363 11/19/04 INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS 112.50 wf 99364 11/19/04 KARSTENS, BRAD 50.00 wf 99365 11/19/04 CARLSON, STEVEN 1,802.91 wf 99366 11/19/04 JAHN, DAVID 1,651.28 wf 99367 11/19/04 MALDONADO, JUANA 331.27 wf 99368 11/19/04 MORIN, TROY 182.75 wf 99369 11/19/04 MATHEYS, ALANA 1,847.41 wf 99370 11/19/04 GENNOW, PAMELA 104.00 wf 99371 11/19/04 HANSEN, LORI 2,006.40 wf 99372 11/19/04 ANDERSON, CYNTHIA 128.00 wf 99373 11/19/04 ANDERSON, ELSIE 192.50 wf 99374 11/19/04 ANDERSON, RONALD 124.00 wf 99375 11/19/04 ANDERSON, SUZANNE 194.75 wf 99376 11/19/04 ANSARI, AHSANUDDIN 136.00 wf 99377 11/19/04 BARRETT, MARLIS 168.00 wf 99378 11/19/04 BARTELT, JOAN 124.00 wf 99379 11/19/04 BAUMEISTER, JULIE 60.00 wf 99380 11/19/04 BELLAND, JAIME 128.00 wf 99381 11/19/04 BERGER, MERVIN 220.00 wf 99382 11/19/04 BERRY, ROBERT 124.00 wf 99383 11/19/04 BOWMAN, KIM 104.00 wf 99384 11/19/04 BREIDENSTEIN, ANNA 124.00 wf 99385 11/19/04 BUNDE, JENNETTE 124.00 wf 99386 11/19/04 BUTTON, JOAN 158.00 wf 99387 11/19/04 CAHANES, LUCILLE 214.50 wf 99388 11/19/04 CARR, ROBERT 64.00 wf 99389 11/19/04 CHASTAN, JEFFREY 160.00 wf 99390 11/19/04 CLELAND, ANN 130.00 wf 99391 11/19/04 COFIELD, NORA 148.00 wf 99392 11/19/04 CONNELLY, THOMAS 144.00 wf 99393 11/19/04 CONNOLLY, COLLEEN 116.00 wf 99394 11/19/04 DAVIDSON, MARIANNE 128.00 wf 99395 11/19/04 DESAI, BHUPAT 220.00 wf 99396 11/19/04 DICKSON, HELEN 128.00 wf 99397 11/19/04 DITTEL, KATHLEEN 247.00 wf 99398 11/19/04 DROEGER, DIANE 225.50 wf 99399 11/19/04 DUCHARME, FRED 220.00 wf 99400 11/19/04 DUELLMAN, AUDREY 412.50 wf 99401 11/19/04 EICKHOFF, CAROLYN 124.00 wf 99402 11/19/04 ERICKSON, ELIZABETH 225.50 24 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 99403 11/19/04 ERICKSON, PHYLLIS 104.00 wf 99404 11/19/04 FISCHER, MARY 209.00 wf 99405 11/19/04 FITZGERALD, DECOKES 132.00 wf 99406 11/19/04 FOSBURGH, ANNE 185.25 wf 99407 11/19/04 FRANZEN, JAMES 132.00 wf 99408 11/19/04 FREER, MARY JO 128.00 wf 99409 11/19/04 FRITSCHE, SAMANTHA 136.00 wf 99410 11/19/04 FULLER, MARY 148.00 wf 99411 11/19/04 GIERZAK, CLARICE 132.00 wf 99412 11/19/04 GILSTAD, MARK 112.00 wf 99413 11/19/04 GOLASKI, DIANE 242.00 wf 99414 11/19/04 GRAHAM, PAUL 152.00 wf 99415 11/19/04 GRANT, GUY 120.00 wf 99416 11/19/04 GRANT, MARY 124.00 wf 99417 11/19/04 GUNN, JACLYNN 142.00 wf 99418 11/19/04 HAYDE, WALTER 132.00 wf 99419 11/19/04 HECHT, LLOYD 132.00 wf 99420 11/19/04 HEININGER, GORDON 172.00 wf 99421 11/19/04 HENSLEY, PATRICIA 166.25 wf 99422 11/19/04 HINES, CONSTANCE 124.00 wf 99423 11/19/04 HOGAN, ANNA 130.00 wf 99424 11/19/04 HOLZEMER, MARY 128.00 wf 99425 11/19/04 HORTON, SHIRLEE 124.00 wf 99426 11/19/04 IVERSEN, MILDRED 124.00 wf 99427 11/19/04 JANACEK, JEFFREY 100.00 wf 99428 11/19/04 JEFFERSON, GWENDOLYN 144.00 wf 99429 11/19/04 JOHANNESSEN, JUDITH 128.00 wf 99430 11/19/04 JOHNSON, BARBARA 128.00 wf 99431 11/19/04 JONES, VICTORIA 323.00 wf 99432 11/19/04 KIDMAN, MARILYN 40.00 wf 99433 11/19/04 KING, HELEN 136.00 wf 99434 11/19/04 KIRCHOFF, HAROLD 100.00 wf 99435 11/19/04 KOCH, ROSEMARY 128.00 wf 99436 11/19/04 KOLASA, JOAN 128.00 wf 99437 11/19/04 KOLASA, JOSEPH 124.00 wf 99438 11/19/04 KOVAL, HARRY 130.00 wf 99439 11/19/04 KREKELBERG, MONA 175.75 wf 99440 11/19/04 KROMINGA, JOSEPHINE 156.00 wf 99441 11/19/04 KUBESH, TONI 12.00 wf 99442 11/19/04 KUNDE, MARGARET 128.00 wf 99443 11/19/04 LA CASSE, ANNETTE 60.00 wf 99444 11/19/04 LACKNER, MARVELLA 236.00 wf 99445 11/19/04 LALLY, RITA 192.50 wf 99446 11/19/04 LAMPE, CHARLOTTE 136.00 wf 99447 11/19/04 CARSON, ANITA 180.50 wf 99448 11/19/04 LAUREN, LORRAINE 136.00 wf 99449 11/19/04 LEINER, WANDA 144.00 wf 99450 11/19/04 LEO, ANN 130.00 wf 99451 11/19/04 LEO, PATRICIA 84.00 wf 99452 11/19/04 LEONARD, CLAUDETTE 96.00 wf 99453 11/19/04 LINCOWSKI, STEVEN 132.00 wf 99454 11/19/04 LINCOWSKI, VIOLA 124.00 wf 99455 11/19/04 LOFGREN, DECOKES 124.00 wf 99456 11/19/04 LOFGREN, RICHARD 199.50 wf 99457 11/19/04 LUNDGREN, ROBERT 66.00 wf 99458 11/19/04 LUTTRELL, SHIRLEY 231.00 25 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 99459 11/19/04 MAEYAERT, PAUL 148.00 wf 99460 11/19/04 MAHRE, CAROL 456.50 wf 99461 11/19/04 MAHRE, GERALDINE 148.00 wf 99462 11/19/04 HANDERS, ROSE 128.00 wf 99463 11/19/04 MANTHEY, JOHN 124.00 wf 99464 11/19/04 MARSH, DECOKES 120.00 wf 99465 11/19/04 MASKREY, THOMAS 100.00 wf 99466 11/19/04 MECHELKE, GERALDINE 124.00 wf 99467 11/19/04 MECHELKE, MARYLOU 130.00 wf 99468 11/19/04 MEYER, JACQUELINE 128.00 wf 99469 11/19/04 MISGEN, JOAN 132.00 wf 99470 11/19/04 HOLLERS, KATHERINE 124.00 wf 99471 11/19/04 MOSSONG, BETTY 148.00 wf 99472 11/19/04 MURASKI, GERALDINE 136.00 wf 99473 11/19/04 MURASKI, HOWARD 132.00 wf 99474 11/19/04 MYSTER, THOMAS 140.00 wf 99475 11/19/04 NIEMAN, JAMES 161.50 wf 99476 11/19/04 NIETERS, LOUISE 356.25 wf 99477 11/19/04 NORBERG, ANN 136.00 wf 99478 11/19/04 OLSON, LOIS 140.00 wf 99479 11/19/04 ORLANDO, SALLYE 124.00 wf 99480 11/19/04 PEHL, DAVID 136.00 wf 99481 11/19/04 PETRIE, JAMES 132.00 wf 99482 11/19/04 RADERMACHER, KARLA 124.00 wf 99483 11/19/04 ROSSOW, KENNETH 124.00 wf 99484 11/19/04 RUDEEN, ELAINE 188.00 wf 99485 11/19/04 SAJEVIC, FLORENCE 96.00 wf 99486 11/19/04 SCHAAF, LARRY 185.25 wf 99487 11/19/04 SCHNEIDER, MARY 211.75 wf 99488 11/19/04 SCHOENECKER, SANDRA 96.00 wf 99489 11/19/04 SCHROEPFER, HARRIET 132.00 wf 99490 11/19/04 SCHULTE, PAULA 124.00 wf 99491 11/19/04 SHAUL, CHRISTOPHER 171.00 wf 99492 11/19/04 SHORES, TERESA 132.00 wf 99493 11/19/04 SKINNER, JEANNE 164.00 wf 99494 11/19/04 SPANGLER, ROBERT 124.00 wf 99495 11/19/04 SPIES, LOUIS 160.00 wf 99496 11/19/04 STAFKI, TIM 180.50 wf 99497 11/19/04 STARK, DAVID 128.00 wf 99498 11/19/04 STEVENS, SANDRA 124.00 wf 99499 11/19/04 TRUER, LORI 44.00 wf 99500 11/19/04 TAYLOR, LORRAINE 132.00 wf 99501 11/19/04 TAYLOR, RITA 140.00 wf 99502 11/19/04 THOMPSON, MILD 231.00 wf 99503 11/19/04 THOMPSON, PATRICIA 286.00 wf 99504 11/19/04 TILLMAN, LEILA 124.00 wf 99505 11/19/04 TOLBERT, D-FRANKLIN 130.00 wf 99506 11/19/04 TOMASZEWSKI, CARMEN 128.00 wf 99507 11/19/04 TRIPPLER, DALE 128.00 wf 99508 11/19/04 TUCKER, CECILIA 144.00 wf 99509 11/19/04 LINGER, CONSTANCE 94.00 wf 99510 11/19/04 URBANSKI, HOLLY 209.00 wf 99511 11/19/04 VAN BLARICOM, BEULAH 140.00 wf 99512 11/19/04 VANAGS, VILHELMINE 92.00 wf 99513 11/19/04 VANDEVEER, BARBARA 124.00 wf 99514 11/19/04 VATNE, MARY 132.00 26 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 99515 11/19/04 WAGNER, CONNIE 132.00 wf 99516 11/19/04 WANDERSEE, GENE 128.00 wf 99517 11/19/04 WASMUNDT, GAYLE 124.00 wf 99518 11/19/04 WILLY, JOHN 175.75 wf 99519 11/19/04 WITSCHEN, DECOKES 144.00 wf 99520 11/19/04 ZACHO, KAREN 146.00 wf 99521 11/19/04 PALANK, MARY 1,771.67 wf 99522 11/19/04 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,586.49 wf 99523 11/19/04 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1,956.96 wf 99524 11/19/04 BAUERS, CHRISTOPHER 80.00 wf 99525 11/19/04 MARTIN, DANIEL 175.00 wf 99526 11/19/04 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 3,458.63 wf 99527 11/19/04 STEINER, JOSEPH 453.00 wf 99528 11/19/04 WELCHLIN, CABOT 3,743.71 wf 99529 11/19/04 FREBERG, RONALD 1,837.31 wf 99530 11/19/04 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 446.26 wf 99531 11/19/04 EDSON, DAVID 1,820.09 wf 99532 11/19/04 HELEY, ROLAND 1,822.31 wf 99533 11/19/04 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,153.94 wf 99534 11/19/04 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,790.49 wf 99535 11/19/04 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1,718.04 wf 99536 11/19/04 GERNES, CAROLE 56.31 wf 99537 11/19/04 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 17.19 wf 99538 11/19/04 BAKER, BRITTANY 22.00 wf 99539 11/19/04 BRADLEY, SAMANTHA 30.00 wf 99540 11/19/04 BROZAK, ANNA 55.00 wf 99541 11/19/04 BROZAK, KATHERINE 45.00 wf 99542 11/19/04 ERICKSON, AMY 66.00 wf 99543 11/19/04 FREYBERGER, RACHEL 246.00 wf 99544 11/19/04 HAWKINS, COURTNEY 66.00 wf 99545 11/19/04 HELKAMP, KAYLA 20.00 wf 99546 11/19/04 HOBBS, KENDRA 66.00 wf 99547 11/19/04 KYRK, HALEY 115.00 wf 99548 11/19/04 O'SHEA, CASSANDRA 30.00 wf 99549 11/19/04 OLSON, KRISTIN 66.00 wf 99550 11/19/04 ROBBINS, EMERALD 70.00 wf 99551 11/19/04 SHOBERG, KAKI 127.88 wf 99552 11/19/04 URBANIAK, MALLORY 115.00 wf 99553 11/19/04 YORKOVICH, BRADLEY 34.00 wf 99554 11/19/04 HAAG, MARK 1,734.55 wf 99555 11/19/04 NADEAU, EDWARD 2,748.86 wf 99556 11/19/04 GLASS, JEAN 1,692.93 wf 99557 11/19/04 SARPONG, SEAN 596.00 wf 99558 11/19/04 SCHULZE, BRIAN 598.50 wf 99558 11/19/04 SCHULZE, BRIAN 579.50 wf 99559 11/19/04 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 126.00 wf 99560 11/19/04 LINGER, MARGARET 666.97 wf 99561 11/19/04 WEISMANN, JENNIFER 122.45 wf 99562 11/19/04 ZERWAS, CRYSTAL 307.10 wf 99563 11/19/04 ANDERSON, CALEB 120.64 wf 99564 11/19/04 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 201.50 wf 99565 11/19/04 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 204.75 wf 99566 11/19/04 BRENEMAN, SEAN 74.03 wf 99567 11/19/04 COSTA, JOSEPH 338.10 wf 99568 11/19/04 DEMPSEY, BETH 134.40 wf 99569 11/19/04 DUNN, RYAN 719.85 27 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 99570 11/19/04 FENGER, JUSTIN 116.73 wf 99571 11/19/04 FIERRO WESTBERG, MELINDA 130.90 wf 99572 11/19/04 GRANT, MELISSA 131.10 wf 99573 11/19/04 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 495.38 wf 99574 11/19/04 HOULE, DENISE 133.80 wf 99575 11/19/04 JOHNSON, MAGGIE 110.50 wf 99576 11/19/04 LAUMER, MELISSA 33.75 wf 99577 11/19/04 PEHOSKI, JOEL 96.50 wf 99578 11/19/04 PROESCH, ANDY 254.18 wf 99579 11/19/04 RODEN, JASON 65.70 wf 99580 11/19/04 ROSTRON, ROBERT 32.50 wf 99581 11/19/04 SCHMIDT, EMILY 22.75 wf 99582 11/19/04 SCHOENECKER, SAMANTHA 188.50 wf 99583 11/19/04 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 143.00 wf 99584 11/19/04 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 22.93 wf 99585 11/19/04 SMITLEY, SHARON 276.00 wf 99586 11/19/04 STAHNKE, AMY 191.75 wf 99587 11/19/04 TRUE, ANDREW 103.70 wf 99588 11/19/04 WARNER, CAROLYN 326.80 wf 99589 11/19/04 WEDES, CARYL 134.70 wf 99590 11/19/04 WELTER, ELIZABETH 329.00 wf 99591 11/19/04 WHITE, NICOLE 580.65 wf 99592 11/19/04 WOODMAN, ALICE 201.00 wf 99593 11/19/04 BOSLEY, CAROL 272.85 wf 99594 11/19/04 DOBBS, SYDNEY 27.00 wf 99595 11/19/04 HAGSTROM, EMILY 13.00 wf 99596 11/19/04 HANSEN, ANNA 68.00 wf 99597 11/19/04 ODDEN, JESSICA 41.10 wf 99598 11/19/04 OIE, REBECCA 58.23 wf 99599 11/19/04 PARAYNO, GUAI 105.45 wf 99600 11/19/04 QUINN, KELLY 40.63 wf 99601 11/19/04 SATTLER, MELINDA 36.00 wf 99602 11/19/04 VAN HALE, PAULA 177.45 wf 99603 11/19/04 WALKER, DAPHINE 85.10 wf 99604 11/19/04 BALDWIN, JANA 25.40 wf 99605 11/19/04 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,123.36 wf 99606 11/19/04 FLEISCHHACKER, JACOB 76.20 wf 99607 11/19/04 HER, CHONG 274.23 wf 99608 11/19/04 NAGEL, BROOKE 232.50 wf 99609 11/19/04 O'GRADY, VICTORIA 26.60 wf 99610 11/19/04 O'GRADY, ZACHARY 48.30 wf 99611 11/19/04 RYDEEN, ARIEL 76.48 wf 99612 11/19/04 SIMPSON, KIMBERLYN 79.80 wf 99613 11/19/04 THEESFELD, CALEB 26.60 wf 99614 11/19/04 VANG, KAY 101.60 wf 99615 11/19/04 VERDELL, TRAQUEZ 142.15 wf 99616 11/19/04 WILLIAMS, NICK 208.50 wf 99617 11/19/04 MULVANEY, DENNIS 1,967.73 450,120.70 28 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 12/03/04 CARDINAL, ROBERT 406.78 dd 12/03/04 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 358.00 dd 12/03/04 KOPPEN, MARVIN 358.00 dd 12/03/04 MONAHAN-JUNEK, JACQUELINE 358.00 dd 12/03/04 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 358.00 dd 12/03/04 COLEMAN, MELINDA 3,967.87 dd 12/03/04 DARST, ROBERTA 1,595.23 dd 12/03/04 FURSMAN, RICHARD 4,629.25 dd 12/03/04 SWANSON, LYLE 1,643.85 dd 12/03/04 LE, SHERYL 3,824.76 dd 12/03/04 2,277.63 dd 12/03/04 FAUST, DANIEL 3,982.97 dd 12/03/04 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 1,413.24 dd 12/03/04 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,118.96 dd 12/03/04 BAUMAN, GAYLE 3,072.70 dd 12/03/04 JACKSON, MARY 1,766.84 dd 12/03/04 KELSEY, CONNIE 878.87 dd 12/03/04 TETZLAFF, JUDY 1,766.84 dd 12/03/04 FRY, PATRICIA 1,699.47 dd 12/03/04 GUILFOILE, KAREN 2,826.07 dd 12/03/04 OSTER, ANDREA 1,713.08 dd 12/03/04 CARLE, JEANETTE 1,591.48 dd 12/03/04 FIGG, SHERRIE 1,043.75 dd 12/03/04 JAGOE, CAROL 1,634.72 dd 12/03/04 JOHNSON, BONNIE 838.72 dd 12/03/04 MOY, PAMELA 744.83 dd 12/03/04 OLSON, SANDRA 1,052.30 dd 12/03/04 WEAVER, KRISTINE 1,733.12 dd 12/03/04 BANICK, JOHN 3,445.97 dd 12/03/04 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,777.72 dd 12/03/04 POWELL, PHILIP 2,156.41 dd 12/03/04 SPANGLER, EDNA 418.00 dd 12/03/04 THOMALLA, DAVID 3,817.59 dd 12/03/04 ABEL, GLINT 2,141.58 dd 12/03/04 ALDRIDGE, MARK 3,791.58 dd 12/03/04 ANDREWS, SCOTT 2,937.38 dd 12/03/04 BAKKE, LONN 2,531.41 dd 12/03/04 BELDE, STANLEY 2,809.05 dd 12/03/04 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 2,123.40 dd 12/03/04 BOHL, JOHN 3,402.66 dd 12/03/04 BUSACK, DANIEL 2,701.23 dd 12/03/04 COFFEY, KEVIN 1,956.60 dd 12/03/04 GROTTY, KERRY 2,337.42 dd 12/03/04 DOBLAR, RICHARD 3,188.57 dd 12/03/04 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 1,566.53 dd 12/03/04 HEINZ, STEPHEN 2,679.92 dd 12/03/04 HIEBERT, STEVEN 2,678.44 dd 12/03/04 JOHNSON, KEVIN 3,804.02 dd 12/03/04 KARIS, FLINT 3,681.75 dd 12/03/04 KONG, TOMMY 2,181.10 29 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 12/03/04 KROLL, BRETT 2,586.90 dd 12/03/04 KVAM, DAVID 3,063.63 dd 12/03/04 CARSON, DANIEL 3,086.12 dd 12/03/04 LU, JOHNNIE 2,990.58 dd 12/03/04 MARINO, JASON 2,166.12 dd 12/03/04 MARTIN, JERROLD 2,752.55 dd 12/03/04 MCCARTY, GLEN 1,767.81 dd 12/03/04 METRY, ALESIA 2,020.50 dd 12/03/04 NYE, MICHAEL 1,552.39 dd 12/03/04 OLSON, JULIE 2,833.13 dd 12/03/04 RABBETT, KEVIN 3,249.86 dd 12/03/04 STEFFEN, SCOTT 3,797.53 dd 12/03/04 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 1,552.39 dd 12/03/04 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 2,672.29 dd 12/03/04 TRAN, JOSEPH 2,705.80 dd 12/03/04 WENZEL, JAY 2,413.28 dd 12/03/04 XIONG, KAO 1,929.60 dd 12/03/04 BARTZ, PAUL 2,359.63 dd 12/03/04 BERGERON, JOSEPH 2,923.88 dd 12/03/04 DUGAS, MICHAEL 2,015.14 dd 12/03/04 DUNK, ALICE 2,639.59 dd 12/03/04 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 2,801.67 dd 12/03/04 EVERSON, PAUL 2,875.91 dd 12/03/04 FLOR, TIMOTHY 3,845.53 dd 12/03/04 FRASER, JOHN 2,476.49 dd 12/03/04 L'ALLIER, DANIEL 1,528.48 dd 12/03/04 LANGNER, SCOTT 1,887.08 dd 12/03/04 PALMA, STEVEN 2,869.49 dd 12/03/04 PARSONS, KURT 2,682.88 dd 12/03/04 THIENES, PAUL 2,692.99 dd 12/03/04 DAWSON, RICHARD 1,816.63 dd 12/03/04 DUELLMAN, KIRK 1,790.44 dd 12/03/04 GJERTSON, MARK 480.00 dd 12/03/04 JOHNSON, DOUGLAS 1,790.44 dd 12/03/04 NOVAK, JEROME 1,796.99 dd 12/03/04 PETERSON, ROBERT 1,867.44 dd 12/03/04 SVENDSEN, RONALD 1,894.79 dd 12/03/04 GERVAIS-JR, CLARENCE 2,575.00 dd 12/03/04 BAUER, MICHELLE 2,081.34 dd 12/03/04 FLAUGHER, JAYME 2,654.31 dd 12/03/04 HERMANSON, CHAD 850.00 dd 12/03/04 JACKSON, LINDA 2,157.88 dd 12/03/04 LAFFERTY, WALTER 2,566.15 dd 12/03/04 LINK, BRYAN 2,128.13 dd 12/03/04 PACOLT, MARSHA 2,238.81 dd 12/03/04 RABINE, JANET 2,161.24 dd 12/03/04 STAHNKE, JULIE 2,161.24 dd 12/03/04 LUKIN, STEVEN 3,487.99 dd 12/03/04 SVENDSEN, RUSTIN 2,798.30 dd 12/03/04 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,710.84 dd 12/03/04 DOLLERSCHELL, ROBERT 266.30 dd 12/03/04 AHL, R. CHARLES 4,220.84 dd 12/03/04 NNEN, AMY 1,147.53 dd 12/03/04 PRIEFER, WILLIAM 2,462.94 dd 12/03/04 WEGWERTH, JUDITH 1,715.29 dd 12/03/04 BRINK, TROY 1,622.04 30 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 12/03/04 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 1,786.04 dd 12/03/04 EDGE, DOUGLAS 1,810.04 dd 12/03/04 JONES, DONALD 1,944.96 dd 12/03/04 KANE, MICHAEL 2,748.86 dd 12/03/04 LUTZ, DAVID 1,814.50 dd 12/03/04 MEYER, GERALD 1,857.33 dd 12/03/04 NAGEL, BRYAN 1,961.87 dd 12/03/04 OSWALD, ERICK 1,969.87 dd 12/03/04 TEVLIN, TODD 1,817.99 dd 12/03/04 CAVETT, CHRISTOPHER 3,056.22 dd 12/03/04 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,277.07 dd 12/03/04 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 1,606.86 dd 12/03/04 JACOBSON, SCOTT 1,453.25 dd 12/03/04 LABEREE, ERIN 2,166.04 dd 12/03/04 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 2,381.62 dd 12/03/04 MURRA, AARON 126.50 dd 12/03/04 PECK, DENNIS 2,356.92 dd 12/03/04 PRIEBE, WILLIAM 2,279.29 dd 12/03/04 VERMEERSCH, CHARLES 2,065.24 dd 12/03/04 ANDERSON, BRUCE 3,939.03 dd 12/03/04 CAREY, HEIDI 1,952.44 dd 12/03/04 HALL, KATHLEEN 1,715.29 dd 12/03/04 MARUSKA, MARK 2,513.20 dd 12/03/04 NAUGHTON, JOHN 1,622.04 dd 12/03/04 SCHINDELDECKER, JAMES 1,788.27 dd 12/03/04 BIESANZ, OAKI,EY 1,248.16 dd 12/03/04 HAYMAN, JANET 1,153.49 dd 12/03/04 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,092.15 dd 12/03/04 NELSON, JEAN 970.95 dd 12/03/04 SEEGER, GERALD 493.67 dd 12/03/04 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 1,918.04 dd 12/03/04 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 2,740.62 dd 12/03/04 KROLL, LISA 1,132.40 dd 12/03/04 LIVINGSTON, JOYCE 1,104.32 dd 12/03/04 SINDT, ANDREA 1,554.04 dd 12/03/04 THOMPSON, DEBRA 440.62 dd 12/03/04 YOUNG, TAMELA 1,445.24 dd 12/03/04 FINWALL, SHANN 2,126.04 dd 12/03/04 ROBERTS, KENNETH 2,559.67 dd 12/03/04 CARVER, NICHOLAS 2,561.82 dd 12/03/04 FISHER, DAVID 3,022.43 dd 12/03/04 MENNENGA, JOHN 420.00 dd 12/03/04 RICE, MICHAEL 1,810.04 dd 12/03/04 SWAN, DAVID 1,898.04 dd 12/03/04 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 2,548.44 dd 12/03/04 ANZALDI, KALI 371.88 dd 12/03/04 BJORK, ALICIA 96.00 dd 12/03/04 FINN, GREGORY 2,011.89 dd 12/03/04 GRAF, MICHAEL 1,813.14 dd 12/03/04 KELLY, LISA 1,263.41 dd 12/03/04 OHLHAUSER, MEGHAN 206.25 dd 12/03/04 ROBBINS, AUDRA 1,872.13 dd 12/03/04 SHERRILL, CAITLIN 282.63 dd 12/03/04 TAUBMAN, DOUGLAS 2,639.27 dd 12/03/04 WERNER, KATIE 238.01 dd 12/03/04 BREHEIM, ROGER 1,790.49 31 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT dd 12/03/04 GERMAIN, DAVID 1,794.93 dd 12/03/04 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 1,786.04 dd 12/03/04 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 2,046.72 dd 12/03/04 ANZALDI, MANDY 1,045.99 dd 12/03/04 COLEMAN, PHILIP 348.00 dd 12/03/04 COLLINS, ASHLEY 123.20 dd 12/03/04 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMOND 179.40 dd 12/03/04 CROSSON, LINDA 2,338.51 dd 12/03/04 KAZISTOVA, ALEKSANDRA 133.20 dd 12/03/04 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 822.37 dd 12/03/04 SCHMIDT, RUSSELL 1,790.55 dd 12/03/04 STAPLES, PAULINE 2,720.85 dd 12/03/04 BENDTSEN, LISA 44.78 dd 12/03/04 BRENEMAN, NEIL 379.18 dd 12/03/04 ERICKSON-CLARK, CAROL 67.75 dd 12/03/04 FONTAINE, KIM 626.36 dd 12/03/04 GREDVIG, ANDERS 295.72 dd 12/03/04 HALEY, BROOKE 152.73 dd 12/03/04 HORWATH, RONALD 1,783.14 dd 12/03/04 IRISH, GRACE 130.10 dd 12/03/04 IRISH, KARL 16.40 dd 12/03/04 JONES, LACEY 29.25 dd 12/03/04 KOEHNEN, AMY 72.45 dd 12/03/04 KOEHNEN, MARY 950.02 dd 12/03/04 KRONHOLM, KATHRYN 385.79 dd 12/03/04 NELSON, SIERRA 127.25 dd 12/03/04 OVERBY, ANNA 38.60 dd 12/03/04 POTTRATZ, DIANE 98.25 dd 12/03/04 SCHMIDT, LINDSEY 22.75 dd 12/03/04 SHAW, KRISTINA 31.15 dd 12/03/04 SMITH, ANN 180.00 dd 12/03/04 TUPY, HEIDE 155.20 dd 12/03/04 TUPY, MARCUS 348.83 dd 12/03/04 WERNER, REBECCA 22.75 dd 12/03/04 WHITE, NICOLE 547.30 dd 12/03/04 GROPPOLI, LINDA 297.00 dd 12/03/04 KURKOSKI, STEPHANIE 77.18 dd 12/03/04 BEHAN, JAMES 1,610.04 dd 12/03/04 LONETTI, JAMES 987.33 dd 12/03/04 MILES, LAURA 213.03 dd 12/03/04 PATTERSON, ALBERT 1,209.00 dd 12/03/04 PRINS, KELLY 915.33 dd 12/03/04 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,549.24 dd 12/03/04 AICHELE, CRAIG 1,830.04 dd 12/03/04 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,008.44 dd 12/03/04 BERGO, CHAD 2,071.54 dd 12/03/04 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 1,850.70 dd 12/03/04 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 1,483.20 dd 12/03/04 HURLEY, STEPHEN 3,174.62 wf 99631 12/03/04 INGVOLDSTAD, CURTIS 56.25 wf 99632 12/03/04 Ki,INE, MARY 50.00 wf 99633 12/03/04 CARLSON, STEVEN 1,802.91 wf 99634 12/03/04 JAHN, DAVID 1,573.98 wf 99635 12/03/04 MALDONADO, JUANA 427.98 wf 99636 12/03/04 MORIN, TROY 163.63 wf 99637 12/03/04 MATHEYS, ALANA 1,847.41 32 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 99638 12/03/04 GENNOW, PAMELA 104.00 wf 99639 12/03/04 HANSEN, LORI 1,646.05 wf 99640 12/03/04 PALANK, MARY 1,670.76 wf 99641 12/03/04 RICHIE, CAROLE 1,716.23 wf 99642 12/03/04 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 1,750.13 wf 99643 12/03/04 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 3,030.99 wf 99644 12/03/04 STEINER, JOSEPH 453.00 wf 99645 12/03/04 WELCHLIN, CABOT 2,635.75 wf 99646 12/03/04 HUBIN, KENNARD 1,567.64 wf 99647 12/03/04 FREBERG, RONALD 1,822.31 wf 99648 12/03/04 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 280.50 wf 99649 12/03/04 I{N[.JTSON, LOIS 935.73 wf 99650 12/03/04 EDSON, DAVID 1,820.09 wf 99651 12/03/04 HELEY, ROLAND 1,822.31 wf 99652 12/03/04 HINNENKAMP, GARY 1,800.08 wf 99653 12/03/04 LINDORFF, DENNIS 1,798.50 wf 99654 12/03/04 NOVAK, MICHAEL 1,718.04 wf 99655 12/03/04 BERGREN, KIRSTEN 33.75 wf 99656 12/03/04 GERNES, CAROLE 125.88 wf 99657 12/03/04 BAKER, BRITTANY 44.00 wf 99658 12/03/04 BOTHWELL, SHEILA 22.00 wf 99659 12/03/04 BRADLEY, SAMANTHA 20.00 wf 99660 12/03/04 BROZAK, KATHERINE 90.00 wf 99661 12/03/04 ERICKSON, AMY 88.00 wf 99662 12/03/04 FREYBERGER, RACHEL 306.00 wf 99663 12/03/04 GADOW, ANNA 55.00 wf 99664 12/03/04 GREER, ABIGAIL 55.00 wf 99665 12/03/04 HABEN, CHARLES 146.00 wf 99666 12/03/04 HAWKINS, COURTNEY 66.00 wf 99667 12/03/04 HOBBS, KENDRA 44.00 wf 99668 12/03/04 KYRK, HALEY 50.00 wf 99669 12/03/04 O'SHEA, CASSANDRA 63.75 wf 99670 12/03/04 OLSON, KRISTIN 44.00 wf 99671 12/03/04 SHOBERG, KARI 96.94 wf 99672 12/03/04 URBANIAK, MALLORY 50.00 wf 99673 12/03/04 HAAG, MARK 1,669.24 wf 99674 12/03/04 NADEAU, EDWARD 2,748.86 wf 99675 12/03/04 DISKERUD, HEATHER 70.00 wf 99676 12/03/04 GLASS, JEAN 1,677.66 wf 99677 12/03/04 SARPONG, SEAN 638.00 wf 99678 12/03/04 SCHULZE, BRIAN 391.50 wf 99679 12/03/04 TOLBERT, FRANCINE 184.00 wf 99680 12/03/04 LINGER, MARGARET 563.22 wf 99681 12/03/04 WEISMANN, JENNIFER 82.95 wf 99682 12/03/04 ZERWAS, CRYSTAL 478.35 wf 99683 12/03/04 ANDERSON, CALEB 88.23 wf 99684 12/03/04 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 110.50 wf 99685 12/03/04 ANDERSON, JUSTIN 110.50 wf 99686 12/03/04 BRENEMAN, SEAN 86.45 wf 99687 12/03/04 BRIN, LAUREN 19.50 wf 99688 12/03/04 COSTA, JOSEPH 144.90 wf 99689 12/03/04 CRAWFORD, RAYMOND 170.00 wf 99690 12/03/04 DEL ROSARIO, THERESA 38.50 wf 99691 12/03/04 DEMPSEY, BETH 112.00 wf 99692 12/03/04 DUNN, RYAN 757.44 wf 99693 12/03/04 ESTRADA, KIEL 44.00 33 CHECK # CHECK DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT wf 99694 12/03/04 FENGER, JUSTIN 161.00 wf 99695 12/03/04 FLICKINGER, JUANITA 39.00 wf 99696 12/03/04 GRANT, MELISSA 42.80 wf 99697 12/03/04 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 472.43 wf 99698 12/03/04 HOULE, DENISE 158.10 wf 99699 12/03/04 JOHNSON, MAGGIE 78.00 wf 99700 12/03/04 KERSCHNER, JOLENE 92.58 wf 99701 12/03/04 KROLL, MARK 123.75 wf 99702 12/03/04 MCMAHON, MELISSA 6.11 wf 99703 12/03/04 MCNIFF, LAURA 35.50 wf 99704 12/03/04 PETERSON, ANNA 52.00 wf 99705 12/03/04 PROESCH, ANDY 359.51 wf 99706 12/03/04 RODEN, JASON 175.50 wf 99707 12/03/04 ROSTRON, ROBERT 100.75 wf 99708 12/03/04 SCHMIDT, EMILY 74.75 wf 99709 12/03/04 SCHOENECKER, SAMANTHA 180.75 wf 99710 12/03/04 SCHRAMM, BRITTANY 97.50 wf 99711 12/03/04 SCHREINER, MICHELLE 55.68 wf 99712 12/03/04 SMITLEY, SHARON 115.00 wf 99713 12/03/04 STAHNKE, AMY 61.75 wf 99714 12/03/04 TRUE, ANDREW 27.20 wf 99715 12/03/04 WARNER, CAROLYN 302.60 wf 99716 12/03/04 WEDES, CARYL 134.70 wf 99717 12/03/04 WELTER, ELIZABETH 163.15 wf 99718 12/03/04 WOODMAN, ALICE 230.40 wf 99719 12/03/04 BOSLEY, CAROL 173.40 wf 99720 12/03/04 HAGSTROM, EMILY 45.50 wf 99721 12/03/04 HANSEN, ANNA 80.76 wf 99722 12/03/04 KELLY, BRYAN 210.00 wf 99723 12/03/04 ODDEN, JESSICA 20.55 wf 99724 12/03/04 OIE, REBECCA 41.10 wf 99725 12/03/04 PARAYNO, GUAI 114.70 wf 99726 12/03/04 QUINN, KELLY 39.00 wf 99727 12/03/04 SATTLER, MELINDA 18.00 wf 99728 12/03/04 VAN HALE, PAULA 198.90 wf 99729 12/03/04 WALKER, DAPHINE 71.75 wf 99730 12/03/04 BALDWIN, JANA 47.63 wf 99731 12/03/04 DOUGLASS, TOM 1,123.36 wf 99732 12/03/04 FLEISCHHACKER, JACOB 133.35 wf 99733 12/03/04 HER, CHONG 164.86 wf 99734 12/03/04 NAGEL, BROOKE 168.54 wf 99735 12/03/04 O'GRADY, VICTORIA 59.85 wf 99736 12/03/04 O'GRADY, ZACHARY 93.15 wf 99737 12/03/04 RYDEEN, ARIEL 167.60 wf 99738 12/03/04 SIMPSON, KIMBERLYN 56.53 wf 99739 12/03/04 THEESFELD, CALEB 26.60 wf 99740 12/03/04 VANG, KAY 50.80 wf 99741 12/03/04 VERDELL, TRAQUEZ 27.80 wf 99742 12/03/04 WILLIAMS, NICK 92.09 wf 99743 12/03/04 ZIEMER, NICOLE 132.28 wf 99744 12/03/04 MULVANEY, DENNIS 1,967.73 426,460.75 34 AGENDA NO. G-2 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLS DATE: December 7, 2004 The alarm ordinance adopted by the Council on 8-28-95 includes a provision that unpaid false alarm charges shall be certified as special assessments. On November 2 three letters were sent advising companies that their unpaid invoice(s) for false alarm charges would be added to their property tax bill for next year if payment was not made by November 25. One of these invoices was paid. The unpaid bills are as follows: $ 200.00 for Sherwood Glen Apartments at 1512 County Road B $ 25.00 for SuperAmerica gas station at 2529 White Bear Avenue It is recommended that the attached resolution be approved to certify these false alarm charges for collection with property taxes payable in 2005. P\perm\FALSE ALARMS.DOC 1 RESOLUTION RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent false alarm charge for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2004, collectible in 2005, and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year: ACCOUNT STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION AMOUNT Sherwood Glen 1512 County Road B SuperAmerica 2529 White Bear Avenue 15-29-22-21-0084 $216.00 11-29-22-22-0040 $27.00 TOTAL $243.00 2 AGENDA NO. G-3 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director RE: INCREASE IN PLANNING FEES (Second Reading) DATE: December 7, 2004 On November 22 the City Council approved first reading of an ordinance to increase planning fees effective 1-1-05. Attached is a copy of the agenda report from that meeting. It is recommended that second reading of the attached ordinance (Exhibit B) be approved. P\agn\userfeescomdev2nd.doc 1 AGENDA NO. K-6 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director RE: INCREASE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE CHARGES DATE: December 7, 2004 INTRODUCTION It is proposed that the Community Development Department service charges be increased by effective January 1, 2005. BACKGROUND It has been past practice to raise service charges annually to keep up with inflation. In 1993 a User Fee Study was completed for the Community Development Department to insure that service charges finance an appropriate portion of the service costs. The User Fee Study report contained recommendations on 50 individual license/permit fees and service charges for the Community Development Department. For each item, it had information on the unit volume, current fee, costs to provide the service, recommended fee, phase-in schedule covering five years for the recommended fee, estimated increased revenue from the recommended fee and subsidy amount after the recommended fee is phased in. On 5-24-93, the Council approved the recommended fees for 1993. There have been annual increases in the service charges since then. On May 24 the City Council approved a user fee study to determine if 17 planning service charges cover city costs. The study has been completed and indicates that for 2003 the city costs exceeded revenues by $98,263. The following is a listing of the revenue and costs for the 17 fees charged: INCREASE CURRENT FEE CURRENT FULL COST INCREASE TIMES 20% PLUS 20% Zone Change 776.00 1,654.48 878.48 176.00 952.00 Conditional Use Permit -Single or Double-Dwelling 232.00 1,505.63 1,273.63 255.00 487.00 Conditional Use Permit -Other 825.00 1,645.85 820.85 164.00 989.00 Conditional Use Permit Revisions -Single or Double Dwelling 46.00 1,505.63 1,459.63 292.00 338.00 Conditional Use Permit Revisions -Other 165.00 1,734.98 1,569.98 314.00 479.00 Home Occupation 165.00 1,344.97 1,179.97 236.00 401.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1,130.00 1,717.48 587.48 117.00 1,247.00 Variance -Single or Double-Dwelling 152.00 1,344.97 1,192.97 239.00 391.00 Variance -Other 848.00 1,344.97 496.97 99.00 947.00 Variance -Front Yard Setback 152.00 516.60 364.60 73.00 225.00 Preliminary Plat 1,400.00 1,990.58 590.58 118.00 1,518.00 Community Design Review Board -Double Dwelling 187.00 1,532.60 1,345.60 269.00 456.00 Community Design Review Board - 15 Day Design Review 152.00 473.60 321.60 64.00 216.00 Planned Unit Development 1,250.00 2,654.28 1,404.28 281.00 1,531.00 Temporary Sign Permit 24.00 44.15 20.15 4.00 28.00 Wall Signs 24.00 101.59 77.59 16.00 40.00 Free Standing Signs 24.00 169.43 145.43 29.00 53.00 Large increases in these 17 fees are needed to produce revenues that will cover the full costs. In P:\FINANCE\WORDWGN\USERFEE_CD.DOC 2 December 7. 2004 order to minimize complaints, the increases in these 17 fees included in the 2004 user fee study could be phased in over afive-year period. Also, all other Community Development Department fees should be increased by 1.3% to keep up with inflation. All of the Community Development Department license/permit fees and services charges are listed in ExhibitAwhich lists the present fee and the proposed 2005 fees. The 17 fees that were in the user fee study are in bold with the 2005 fee at one-fifth of the increase listed in the user fee study. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve (1) increases in the Community Development Department fees as listed in Exhibit A effective January 1, 2005 and (2) approve first reading of an ordinance (Exhibit B) to increase the planning fees. P:\FINANCE\WORDWGN\USERFEE_CD.DOC 3 December 7. 2004 Exhibit A Page 1 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Service Charges Estimated Fee Annual 2003 2004 2005 Volume Fee Fee Fee PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance) Zone Change 8 776 788 952 Conditional Use Permit: R1 and R2 1 232 236 487 Other 11 825 838 989 Conditional Use Permit Revision: R1 and R2 6 46 47 338 Other 8 165 168 479 Variances: R1 and R2 6 152 154 391 Other 6 848 862 947 Front Yard Setback 1 152 154 225 Vacations: R1 and R2 10 146 148 150 Other 2 567 576 583 Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): R1 and R2 11 81 82 83 Other 1 302 307 311 Home Occupations Initial Permit 6 165 168 401 Annual Renewal 6 55 56 Sign Erection Permit (per inspection) 100 24 24 24 Temporary Sign Permit 30 24 24 28 Wall Sign Permit 50 24 24 40 Free Standing Signs 13 24 24 53 P:\Finance\Excel\Misc\FEES CD *Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions. 12/7/2004 Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Service Charges Fee Estimated Annual Volume 2003 Fee 2004 Fee 2005 Fee Comprehensive Plan Amendment 8 1,130 1,148 1,247 Code Amendment 1 848 862 873 Planned Unit Development 8 1,250 1,270 1,531 Preliminary Plat 8 1,400 1,420 1,518 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension 9 220 224 227 Final Plat 5 380 386 391 Time Extensions/Renewals 9 139 141 143 LICENSES DUE JANUARY 1st Commercial Fertilizer Application License 112 114 115 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES Woodlot Alteration Permit 1 14 14 14 Building Relocation 5 810 823 834 Moving Permit 3 52 53 54 Community Design Review Board: R1 & R2 15 Day Design Review Revision Other 8 1 3 16 187 152 0 682 190 154 0 693 456 216 190 702 Mobile Home Permit 1 40 41 42 On-Site Sewage Systems 6 66 67 68 Truth-In-Housing Filing Fee 100 31 31 31 Truth-In-Housing Evaluators License 29 104 106 107 Zoning Compliance Letter 24 24 24 Project Notification Sign 12 100 100 101 Front Yard Setback Authorization 0 0 154 Minor Construction Project 0 0 154 P:\Finance\Excel\Misc\FEES CD *Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions. 12/7/2004 Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Service Charges Fee Estimated Annual Volume 2003 Fee 2004 Fee 2005 Fee PUBLICATIONS (Includes Sales Tax): Zoning Code 6 6 6 Platting Code 3 3 3 Sign Code 3 3 3 Comprehensive Plan 15 15 15 Zoning Map 11 11 11 City Map 3 3 3 Section Map 3 3 3 Planning Commission or Community Design Review Board: Minutes -Per Year Agenda Packet -Per Year Property Owner List 15 112 65 15 114 66 15 115 67 P:\Finance\Excel\Misc\FEES CD *Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions. 12/7/2004 ORDINANCE NO. PLANNING FEES Section 1. Section 36 - 26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follo~n Section 36 - 26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change 952 Conditional Use Permit: R1 & R2 487 Other 989 Conditional Use Permit Revision: R1 & R2 338 Other 479 Variances: R1 & R2 391 Other 947 Front Yard Setback 225 Vacations: R1 & R2 150 Other 583 Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): R1 & R2 83 Other 311 Home Occupation Permit (initial permit) Initial permit 401 Annual permit 56 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1,247 Code Amendment 873 Planned Unit Development 1,531 Preliminary Plat 1,518 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension 227 Final Plat 391 Time Extensions/Renewals 143 Section 2. Section 36 - 258 of the sign code is amended as follows: Section 36 - 258. Fees. (1) The sign erection permit fee shall be $24 (per inspection) 854 Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective on January 12005 Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 2004 Attest: Clerk Mayor Ayes -- Nayes-- Exhibit B 7 AGENDA NO. G-4 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: WRITE OFF UNCOLLECTIBLE AMBULANCE BILLS FOR 2002 DATE: December 7, 2004 punpncaT. It is proposed that the uncollectible 2002 ambulance bills in the amount of $457,156.53 be written off. BACKGROUND The following four steps are used to collect payments on ambulance bills: 1. First Notice: Ambulance charges are billed on a daily basis upon receipt of a run sheet. The first notice requests: (1) payment in full unless covered by insurance, (2) appropriate numbers and consent forms for those having insurance. 2. Second Notice: If the bill remains unpaid 30 days after the first bill, a second notice is sent to those who have still not paid or did not send in requested insurance information. 3. Third Notice: If the bill remains unpaid 60 days after the first bill, further attempts are made to contact the patient and the hospital for information. 4. Final Notice: If no contact can be made, a determination is made if the amount due can be certified to a property owners taxes or collected using the Minnesota Revenue Recapture Program. 5. If the bill remains unpaid, it is sent to American Accounts & Advisors, Inc. for collection. The collection agency writes up to four letters and makes phone calls. After 30 days, the collection agency calls us and asks for approval to send the unpaid accounts on to full collection and possible court proceedings. The 2002 ambulance bills proposed to be written off have been processed through these five steps. Further collection efforts are not feasible. P:AFINANCE\WORD~AGIV~UNCOLLECTIBLE AMB 2004.doc Steps taken to improve collections have been: 1. Installed upgraded version of ambulance billing software. 2. Revised our billing notices to minimize misunderstandings and achieve quicker follow-up. 3. Bill on a daily basis. 4. Bill all insurance. The following graph shows the collection rates for 1999 - 2002. AMBULANCE BILL COLLECTION RATES AS OF 10-31-04 ~oo.o°io so.o°io so.o°io 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% P:AFINANCE\WORD~AGIV~UNCOLLECTIBLE AMB 2004.doc 2 1999 2000 2001 2002 The following is a summary of transactions for ambulance services provided in 2002 compared to 2000 and 2001. 2000 2001 2002 Service Charges Billed $1,130,894 $1,252,897 $1,696,707 Service Charges Paid -947,753 -1,015,218 -1,212,495 Service Charges Assessed/Certified -7,291 -13,467 -23,357 Time Pay Accounts -1,302 -404 -21 *Hardship Cancellations -4,336 -3,033 -3,677 Uncollectible Balance $170,212 $220,775 $457,157 Payments on Accounts Written Off $1,413 $1,795 $323 The uncollectible balance for 2002 is more than 2001 due to an increase in the ambulance rates and a change in the Medicare law. Effective 04-01-02, Medicare began requiring all ambulance providers to accept assignment. This law change prohibits the city from collecting the balance of the bill from the patient. We are limited to what Medicare allows. Last year the write off totaled $4,658.27 in the Medicare category. This year it has increased by over $240,000 to $245,272.55. If we had been able to collect this difference, the write offs for 2002 would have been less than those for 2001. We are continuing to use the procedure where the law allows us to levy for unpaid ambulance bills. We have certified $23,357.43 to property owners for collection with property taxes. An itemization of the uncollectible balance for 2002 is attached. The last page of the itemization provides totals by category for the uncollectible balance. The following is an explanation of each category: CATEGORY EXPLANATION Bankruptcy Write Off Collection of ambulance bills for individuals that have filed for bankruptcy is not possible because it is an unsecured claim. However, ambulance bills are not put in this category if it is covered by insurance or medical assistance. Collections Write Off These are accounts on which our collection agencies have exhausted all possible means of collection. Deceased Write Off Accounts on which the patient is deceased and there is no estate to bill. Medical Assistance Write Off Accounts where we have to accept assignment. We are prohibited from collecting anything over the amount approved. Medicare Accounts where we have to accept assignment. Medicare made this mandatory effective 04-01-02. P:AFINANCE\WORD~AGIV~UNCOLLECTIBLE AMB 2004.doc 3 MN Revenue Recapture These accounts have been sent to the Minnesota Department of Revenue in order to receive payments by intercepting refunds to patients. Collection of these accounts is still possible but not probable. Misc Balances Miscellaneous balance, i.e., Less than $5.00; Incorrect patient information. Veterans Write Off The city is required to accept what VA pays as payment in full. Workers' Comp Write Off The city is required to accept what Workers' Compensation pays as payment in full. Service charges usually increase annually due to increases in the billing rates. The billing rates for 2000 through 2002 were as follows: 2000 2001 2002 Non-transport $0 $210 $210 Basic Life Support -Resident 395 415 560 Basic Life Support -Non-Resident 420 440 585 Advanced Life Support -Resident 660 710 850 Advanced Life Support -Non-Resident 710 760 900 Mileage (rate per mile) 9.10 9.65 10.40 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the $457,156.53 of ambulance bills itemized in the attached exhibit be written off as uncollectible. *Under the procedure approved by the Council on March 10, 1997 (amended May 10, 1999), the Finance Director is authorized to approve cancellations if the adjusted household income is under 185% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines and the liquid assets are under $3,000 for individuals and $6,000 for couples. Cancellations in 2003 were $3,627.56 and in 2004 through October 31 were $1,227.42. gb P:AFINANCE\WORD~AGIV~UNCOLLECTIBLE AMB 2004.doc 4 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 00017253A1 976988 ODENWALD, JUDY BKWO 129.99 00020988A1 977335 SWARTZ, RUTH MNRR 278.50 01010898A1 978587 YEKALDO, CYNTHIA R MNAA 730.62 01020015A1 980026 MONIN, JOSEPH L MNAA 767.90 01023271A1 980279 AMONETT, NANCY A COWO 787.20 01023447A1 980279 AMONETT, NANCY A COWO 787.20 02000010A1 980376 COAKLEY, AARON C MAWO 461.57 02000025A1 980383 GOLDEN, RICO L MAWO 464.91 02000042A1 980388 PALMER, CATHY A MAWO 199.86 02000060A1 980389 SANDERS, SHIRELLA S MAWO 449.93 02000133A1 977610 SCHMITZ, KEITH MAWO 484.95 02000136A1 980139 MUELHAUPT, CHRISTOPHER C MAWO 464.91 02000230A1 980426 GRAYER, CARLTON J MNRR 870.80 02000289A1 980395 COLLOVA, JANICE M MAWO 58.08 02000306A1 980398 CANNADY, MICHAEL A MCWO 603.98 02000374A1 980406 FOX, ANDREW T MCWO 577.71 02000439A1 970032 SWEENEY, JACQUELINE MAWO 159.93 02000452A1 980409 STARZINSKI, VERONICA M WCWO 85.56 02000506A1 980412 PROCINO, MARIANNE COWO 672.33 02000509A1 980411 ROBINSON, HELEN M MAWO 400.34 02000597A1 980417 SOTO-MARTINEZ, RAMONA Y MAWO 464.91 02000621A1 980421 PERTEET, MICHELLE L COWO 605.80 02000643A1 978541 KING, BRANDY MNRR 902.00 02000662A1 980425 SWANSON, COURTNEY A MNRR 983.20 02000706A1 980430 DRAKE, LORI J MNRR 933.20 02000712A1 980431 STEWART, GLORIA L MCWO 175.22 02000743A1 980434 LEDESMA, ASHLYN M MAWO 189.89 02000751 Al 980436 BAKER, ABRAHAM F MCWO 535.64 02000759A1 980345 COLEMAN, THOMAS P MAWO 529.89 02000785A1 974219 MORRISON, TIMOTHY MAWO 449.93 02000787A1 980437 PARENTEAU, JOHN R WCWO 89.31 02000801A1 973557 GALLAGHER, MICHAEL MAWO 440.52 02000819A1 980438 KAZMIERCZAK, SEAN T MAWO 189.89 02000928A1 980444 TEMPEST, DELORES S MNRR 331.12 02001024A1 980454 MARTINEZ, LORALEE G MAWO 478.71 02001072A1 980460 SIMS, ERIKA R COWO 931.20 02001079A1 980461 BERGLUND, BERNADINE R MCWO 492.31 02001081 Al 980072 MARKHAM, JOHN L MNAA 443.11 02001145A1 980471 GRIFFIN, DOTTIE L MNRR 548.40 02001182A1 980473 STUCCI, LEA L MNRR 231.24 02001189A1 980475 WHITEHEAD, RENADA R MNRR 2.60 02001207A1 980478 JONES, GARY A MAWO 192.42 02001212A1 971307 CORK, JAMES MAWO 521.01 02001224A1 974986 YANG, TRUE MAWO 424.34 02001269A1 980488 ROOTES, HEATHER M MNRR 881.20 02001298A1 971673 JORDAN, ROBERT J MNRR 162.00 02001339A1 980528 GIVOT, BRADLEY L BKWO 962.40 02001345A1 976481 BEAURLINE, CAROL MCWO 503.79 02001354A1 980535 BROWN, SHAKITA MAWO 610.07 02001445A1 980496 LUNDIN, DOROTHY OTHR 0.02 02001456A1 980519 SHEFFIELD, RENEE A MAWO 440.52 02001472A1 978453 HAGEL, MARCELLA R MAWO 509.53 02001512A1 972615 FERN, MARY JEAN MCWO 476.17 02001524A1 974626 SCHLICHT, SISTER VIOLA MAWO 526.75 02001577A1 980520 HEDRICK, AMBER MNRR 684.80 02001602A1 973557 GALLAGHER, MICHAEL MAWO 459.78 02001651A1 973662 KEEFE, JOY MAWO 454.91 02001660A1 980525 TATA, ROBINSON M MNRR 186.24 02001849A1 976326 KLENK, PATRICIA MAWO 434.95 02001889A1 971316 KELLER, MERCEDES MAWO 394.55 02001907A1 974663 PRUST, KEVIN MNRR 210.00 02001943A1 980555 THESENVITZ, MICHAEL L OTHR 920.80 02001946A1 980556 DICK, RONALD M MAWO 548.05 02001952A1 980557 STRAKA, RUBY A MCWO 502.82 02001968A1 980558 NICOSIA, MARYANN L MAWO 515.27 02001981A1 971008 ZEIMET, BERNARD MAWO 449.93 02002048A1 980561 BRUSKI, KYLIE A MAWO 529.89 02002084A1 976978 SMITH, ROBIN MAWO 498.05 02002209A1 980667 KJOS, JORDAN R MNRR 891.60 02002332A1 980573 MORRISON, RUSSELL W MNRR 972.80 02002362A1 971151 LEDO, VIOLET OTHR 922.80 02002377A1 980580 KILLEN, SHANNON M MAWO 499.93 02002421 Al 977740 GULDEN, JESSICA MAWO 449.93 02002440A1 980582 TERRY, DONALD C MNRR 941.60 02002468A1 980589 CARR, ROBERT L MNRR 590.10 5 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02002662A1 980606 GARSKE, LOREN MAWO 509.53 02002693A1 980608 PIERCE, STEVEN D MAWO 167.42 02002729A1 971008 ZEIMET, BERNARD MAWO 442.44 02002848A1 980623 KNICKMEIER, JOYCE B MAWO 515.27 02002874A1 980618 ANDERSON,VENESSAA COWO 912.40 02002952A1 980628 LIPARI, VINENZO OTHR 0.30 02002989A1 980633 MANSON, ALEX E MCWO 532.49 02003064A1 980638 XIONG, FUE MAWO 464.91 02003090A1 977948 EMERSON, RONALD MAWO 457.42 02003121 Al 980640 VO, XUNG T MCWO 509.43 02003130A1 980641 KUE, KEVIN TSI 910.40 02003135A1 980648 CARSON, PHYLLIS A MAWO 214.89 02003184A1 980663 YANG, LAH MAWO 492.31 02003193A1 971845 TURBES, REGINA MAWO 498.05 02003236A1 980666 FREEMAN, ANNETTE MAWO 514.91 02003247A1 980667 KJOS, JORDAN R MNRR 870.80 02003293A1 979049 WITT, DOROTHY MAWO 580.67 02003392A1 980651 BINGHAM, KIMBERLY K MAWO 479.89 02003428A1 980685 JOHNSON, BRUCE A BKWO 595.40 02003542A1 980691 ALVARADO, CHASE J MAWO 86.04 02003552A1 980694 JOHNSON, CHERYL MAWO 472.40 02003628A1 971085 NELSON, JERROLD MCWO 526.75 02003630A1 978261 CRILL, DOUG MAWO 152.44 02003634A1 970463 SOLOMONSON, AMYL WCWO 89.31 02003638A1 980698 KINGSLEY, ALBIRTY MAWO 509.53 02003692A1 977948 EMERSON, RONALD MAWO 442.44 02003833A1 977259 REITER, ANNA MAWO 492.31 02003874A1 980713 RUSSELL, TAKIILA N MAWO 507.42 02003913A1 980715 BENITEZ, MARGARITO C COWO 902.00 02003917A1 980717 RYSDAM, ALESHIA R COWO 931.20 02003923A1 980718 INYANG, SAMUEL A MNRR 912.40 02003925A1 980719 MANCERA-CORONA, ALEXANDRO MAWO 441.81 02004112A1 974999 PLUMBERG, NEVA MAWO 486.57 02004329A1 980741 REVIER, LUCILLE C MCWO 492.31 02004331A1 970267 CARDINAL, IDAMAY MAWO 25.00 02004342A1 980431 STEWART, GLORIA L MAWO 576.75 02004349A1 980742 LYONS, PHILIP A MNRR 983.20 02004375A1 980750 ZIEBOL, CAROLINE M MAWO 449.93 02004380A1 980751 LEE, YOUA MAWO 543.08 02004386A1 970267 CARDINAL, IDAMAY MAWO 25.00 02004482A1 980756 BURDINE, LISA K MNRR 570.40 02004602A1 980816 SPANN, CHIQUILA R MAWO 464.91 02004604A1 980770 FULLER, CLIFTON E MAWO 174.91 02004710A1 980781 VANG, JAMES MAWO 522.40 02004734A1 980782 SWANSON, CARL H MAWO 498.05 02004785A1 980786 COX-COLES, DEANDRE COWO 993.60 02004801A1 971008 ZEIMET, BERNARD MAWO 449.93 02004846A1 970183 VOLKERT, JOHN MCWO 509.54 02004901A1 980797 GEARIN, PATTY M OTHR 0.03 02004948A1 978945 PSCHANDL, PHYLLIS M MAWO 567.29 02005035A1 978045 TRENT, LEONARD MAWO 454.91 02005055A1 980667 KJOS, JORDAN R MNRR 870.80 02005195A1 974459 CAMPANARO, GEORGE L MAWO 480.83 02005221 Al 980810 JENSEN, ANDREW C MNRR 860.40 02005228A1 980818 ENG, CLYDE W MCWO 492.03 02005230A1 980819 VOGEL, DELORES F MCWO 531.07 02005359A1 979197 DEROSE, JAMES J MCWO 519.92 02005365A1 980836 HARDY, DONSHAY I MAWO 332.93 02005373A1 980824 MARTIN, LAWRENCE A MCWO 542.03 02005385A1 980826 HAGEN, ROXANNE T MNRR 314.40 02005386A1 980827 HOLDEN, EARL M COWO 983.20 02005410A1 970183 VOLKERT, JOHN MCWO 525.50 02005421 Al 977558 MCKAY, FLOYD C MCWO 553.39 02005489A1 980816 SPANN, CHIQUILA R MAWO 174.34 02005494A1 980842 MISHLER, PHYLLIS M MCWO 542.23 02005501A1 980846 MADELEY JR, BARYONS MNAA 983.20 02005503A1 973557 GALLAGHER, MICHAEL MAWO 419.71 02005525A1 980852 BROWN, ELSIE R MCWO 492.03 02005528A1 980853 ROSEN, PHILIP MCWO 492.03 02005533A1 980854 KOUTEK, RICHARD R MCWO 470.14 02005552A1 980855 YANG, YONG L MAWO 494.62 02005590A1 980857 XIONG, NA LEE MAWO 424.90 02005594A1 980859 TRACY, DUWAYNE A MCWO 508.76 02005595A1 980860 LACASSE, KELLY L MAWO 449.55 02005617A1 980864 PETERSEN, MARKS MCWO 497.61 6 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02005635A1 971752 COTRONEO, ETHELYN MCWO 503.18 02005639A1 980867 REYER, BETTY J MAWO 503.18 02005660A1 970032 SWEENEY, JACQUELINE MAWO 439.69 02005662A1 970458 SPREEMAN, BEVERLY MCWO 508.76 02005663A1 980869 BEAULIEU, ARLIS J WCWO 149.04 02005677A1 977886 KOCOUREK, MYRTLE J MCWO 542.23 02005718A1 980341 HUNTER, DEBRA L MAWO 534.06 02005727A1 971106 ANDREWS, ALICE MCWO 402.98 02005736A1 980914 SCHROEDER, JANET S DECE 188.32 02005751 Al 980871 KING, ANTHONY R MAWO 449.55 02005759A1 980872 HANSON, BONIBEL MCWO 497.61 02005772A1 975569 REILLY, MARGARET MCWO 519.92 02005822A1 980913 WHITE, OSCAR MCWO 503.18 02005895A1 980496 LUNDIN, DOROTHY MCWO 519.92 02005904A1 980878 WARD, PAMELA J MAWO 508.76 02005985A1 975160 ROACH, BRYAN OTHR 210.00 02006055A1 980884 WILLIAMS, JAMES X MAWO 445.70 02006075A1 972218 TRULSEN, ORVILLE N MAWO 541.73 02006106A1 980886 CARTER, GARY D VAWO 291.00 02006129A1 974306 LIPPY, EVELYN MCWO 514.34 02006141 Al 980888 DAVIDSON, MARIANNE MCWO 436.81 02006159A1 980958 WALDORF, TAMMY MAWO 514.40 02006178A1 980889 BROWNING, DOROTHY H MCWO 497.61 02006198A1 980892 PATRAW, DAVID J MNRR 941.60 02006230A1 980895 JACKSON, MALINDA A MNRR 120.32 02006238A1 977558 MCKAY, FLOYD C MCWO 492.03 02006245A1 977873 SVENDSEN, RUBY MAWO 519.92 02006252A1 974892 VANDAL, NOEMI WCWO 89.31 02006267A1 980899 WARD, DIANNE L MNRR 591.20 02006303A1 980901 KELLEY, MAUD MCWO 514.34 02006340A1 980904 PFEILSTICKER, PATRICIA L MNRR 962.40 02006348A1 980906 YANG, CHAT COWO 615.69 02006371 Al 980872 HANSON, BONIBEL MCWO 503.18 02006381A1 980907 FRANK, KRISTINA I MAWO 174.34 02006403A1 980180 RULLI, ISABELL G MCWO 492.03 02006413A1 977209 EVANSEN, DAVID MAWO 563.19 02006437A1 980916 DAVIS, ROCKLAND AAA 881.20 02006445A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 444.62 02006451 Al 980711 KORNTOP, MARY A MCWO 375.09 02006466A1 980922 RIPPLE, DAVID A MNRR 881.20 02006487A1 970038 BATTERSON, GARY H MCWO 503.18 02006497A1 980924 JOHNSON, RUTH C MCWO 542.03 02006517A1 980926 MALONE, MARILYN MNAA 101.90 02006518A1 980610 KANNIAINEN, CHARLENE MCWO 375.09 02006586A1 980943 HOLLENBECK, JEFF W MNRR 733.20 02006619A1 980932 CASALENDA, WALTER L MCWO 581.07 02006655A1 980935 SCHULTZ, DONALD AAA 910.40 02006675A1 980399 KOWALSKI, LORRAINE A MCWO 492.03 02006701 Al 975498 GATTEN, ELEANOR MCWO 531.07 02006740A1 980888 DAVIDSON, MARIANNE MCWO 441.42 02006783A1 980949 BRINGS, EILEEN L MCWO 514.33 02006806A1 980950 HENDRICKSON, EDWARD F MCWO 503.18 02006859A1 980952 DUMAS, CHRISTOPHER K COWO 941.60 02006899A1 971008 ZEIMET, BERNARD MAWO 434.76 02006924A1 980954 SCHWARTZ, BEATRICE MCWO 397.40 02006928A1 977948 EMERSON, RONALD MAWO 444.62 02006930A1 975962 SCHWINGHAMMER, PAUL MAWO 542.03 02006942A1 980955 ROSSBACH, BETTY A MCWO 497.61 02006978A1 972865 SHETKA, MARIAN MCWO 492.03 02006991 Al 980451 RISVOLD, CARS MCWO 553.18 02007011A1 980957 FLAHERTY, LUCILLE D MCWO 497.61 02007050A1 980973 ROGGE, MALANI A MAWO 499.55 02007059A1 980975 NELSON, GENELDA M MCWO 569.92 02007074A1 980977 OLSON, GERD E MCWO 492.03 02007158A1 973805 CARSON, EDITH MCWO 386.24 02007160A1 980980 JOHNSON, MELVIN R MAWO 525.50 02007162A1 980981 SCHMIDT, DANIEL L MNAA 943.60 02007173A1 974111 BEATH, ANDREW MNAA 943.60 02007226A1 980983 HARRIS, JUNE MCWO 542.03 02007306A1 980987 PATTERSON, DELLISHIA T MAWO 449.55 02007316A1 978541 KING, BRANDY MAWO 459.41 02007395A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 449.55 02007405A1 977679 WOLD, VIRGINIA MCWO 481.28 02007455A1 972615 FERN, MARY JEAN MCWO 391.82 02007459A1 980994 STARK, MARY A MCWO 497.61 7 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02007467A1 972568 SMEED, WILLIAM S MCWO 547.81 02007528A1 980997 EVERTZ, SHIRLEY A MCWO 508.76 02007531 Al 980998 STOLP, RALPH M MCWO 507.76 02007538A1 980999 JONES, CAROL J MAWO 439.69 02007540A1 981000 BREAULT, VIRGINIA M MCWO 542.03 02007594A1 970716 GIBBON, KENNETH W MCWO 503.18 02007595A1 981002 ALI, MADIHA M MAWO 449.55 02007598A1 981003 THAO, LEE M MAWO 499.55 02007607A1 981004 EVANS, LASEAN MAWO 439.69 02007626A1 981009 PETERSON, ALANTA MAWO 434.76 02007642A1 981010 DAVIS, LEANDRE M CMS 941.60 02007655A1 981011 DANISZEWSKI, VERGIE MCWO 492.03 02007677A1 981013 SWENSON, DONALD M WCWO 159.96 02007717A1 980961 MAIDA, RAYMOND R MCWO 519.92 02007730A1 981017 ERICKSON, BARBARA J MAWO 558.76 02007751 Al 981019 SCHLAEGER, JOYCE F MCWO 536.65 02007764A1 981020 MORALES, MARIO COWO 860.40 02007791 Al 981022 KRAUT, RONALD W MCWO 564.34 02007792A1 980971 YANG, SHOUA MAWO 434.76 02007827A1 981024 GALLEGOS, REYNA MAWO 454.48 02007853A1 981027 ROMANOWSKI, IRIS M MCWO 597.81 02007860A1 981028 RICHARDS, JOHN W MCWO 542.03 02007863A1 981029 SCHULTZ, CLIFTON MAWO 497.61 02007880A1 980631 BUSCH, FREDERICK W MAWO 397.40 02007893A1 977679 WOLD, VIRGINIA MCWO 484.99 02007932A1 977830 JOHNSON, WINNIFRED L MCWO 492.03 02007972A1 981035 KNIPPENBERG, GLEN A WCWO 141.24 02008046A1 981038 CHANG, YOUA MAWO 497.61 02008087A1 981040 SHABAZZ, ALAMEEN MAWO 499.55 02008122A1 976593 SCHUNEMAN, GEORGE MCWO 492.03 02008136A1 981041 LEE, SOON C COWO 657.80 02008169A1 977129 MORNEAU, JOHN MAWO 503.18 02008186A1 977102 BROWN, RACHEAL MAWO 566.31 02008227A1 974663 PRUST, KEVIN MNRR 870.80 02008251A1 981043 MALDONADO, JOSE R COWO 920.80 02008283A1 981115 PETERSON, HAYLIE E MAWO 613.19 02008298A1 977471 BILOTTA, VIRGINIAN MCWO 508.76 02008390A1 975632 HANSEN, IRVING MCWO 525.50 02008401 Al 981067 BIAGINI, MARGARETE B MCWO 497.61 02008440A1 981054 PETERSON, DORIS M MCWO 503.18 02008452A1 981070 SCHILLER, WILLIAM A MCWO 492.03 02008455A1 981071 GANGL, ROBERT B MCWO 542.03 02008522A1 980147 MCRUNNEL, DOUGLAS MCWO 503.18 02008551A1 980971 YANG, SHOUA MAWO 459.41 02008585A1 980334 PORWOLL, BERNICE MCWO 503.56 02008607A1 980981 SCHMIDT, DANIEL L MNAA 657.80 02008617A1 981077 HARHOLDT, HOWARD W MCWO 508.76 02008664A1 981079 KARNOWSKI, SCOTT A MAWO 542.23 02008696A1 981119 HOWARD, LEONA H MCWO 375.14 02008706A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 449.55 02008709A1 981080 GIERNET, JAMES J WCWO 138.42 02008730A1 981081 LYON, CARDINAL G MCWO 525.50 02008751 Al 977830 JOHNSON, WINNIFRED L MCWO 492.03 02008803A1 981089 WALLACE, CHARLES T MAWO 508.76 02008804A1 981090 WATSON, PEARL E MAWO 464.34 02008903A1 981092 SHOCKEY, MELISSA MNRR 165.90 02008904A1 981093 DODES, JASON MNRR 912.40 02008929A1 981096 DAVID, JUSTINE MCWO 488.71 02008944A1 981098 HOWARD, MICHAEL MAWO 558.76 02008953A1 981099 NORTON, ROBERT M MCWO 261.92 02008961A1 981100 WALTON-YANZ, NINA MAWO 613.19 02008977A1 980999 JONES, CAROL J MAWO 429.83 02008985A1 978223 MICHAUD, LORRAINE MCWO 375.09 02008988A1 980999 JONES, CAROL J MAWO 439.69 02008995A1 978962 HOFFMAN, DELORES L MCWO 514.34 02009048A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 449.55 02009099A1 976097 ORR, LUELLA MCWO 536.65 02009108A1 981106 JENKINS, JACOBEY MAWO 444.62 02009124A1 972292 ANGLIN, JAMES MAWO 519.92 02009125A1 981122 HOFFREN, JOAN MCWO 375.09 02009163A1 981109 HORN, LORRAINE M MCWO 547.81 02009171A1 978045 TRENT, LEONARD MAWO 449.55 02009175A1 971787 RYAN, ROBERT K MCWO 492.42 02009179A1 981110 POWELL, TAMARA MAWO 449.55 02009244A1 970801 TSCHIDA, MARIE A MAWO 439.69 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02009256A1 981113 CUNNINGHAM, DOLORES R MCWO 492.42 02009257A1 972440 SMITH, DONALD A MCWO 542.03 02009303A1 973557 GALLAGHER, MICHAEL MAWO 519.92 02009310A1 980018 KELLER, ROBERT W MCWO 492.03 02009311A1 981123 LEONHARDT, NINA P TSI 962.40 02009317A1 970674 LEE, RHODA MCWO 375.09 02009336A1 971233 WILSON, DOROTHEA MAWO 419.71 02009406A1 981128 MEYER, FRIEDA T MCWO 531.07 02009416A1 981130 GRAY, MARGRETE L MNRR 182.08 02009421 Al 981132 ZUBER, ALPHA R MCWO 497.61 02009428A1 981134 BROWN, BETTY E MNRR 891.60 02009469A1 981135 IVERSON, KEVIN M MAWO 509.41 02009516A1 981150 COLLINS, ERIC B MNRR 471.87 02009517A1 981139 TERRY, SHAWN L MAWO 489.69 02009523A1 981140 GITZEN, JOSEPHINE A MCWO 492.03 02009531 Al 970249 WALD, FRANCIS MCWO 408.56 02009533A1 981141 TRUONG, LUU D MCWO 525.50 02009540A1 977840 BENITZ, JOANNE MCWO 531.07 02009570A1 981143 BOWIE, ANGEL L MAWO 569.43 02009618A1 971288 TAUER, SYLVESTER J MCWO 503.18 02009623A1 976818 HOCHBAN, GRAYCE MCWO 497.61 02009693A1 971008 ZEIMET, BERNARD MAWO 429.83 02009759A1 981152 HEYNYUK, OLEH MAWO 497.76 02009778A1 981178 SMITH, DOROTHY D MCWO 414.13 02009791 Al 981154 WEIER, ANNA M MCWO 542.03 02009853A1 981155 DREW, ADRIAN MCWO 514.34 02009866A1 981180 HAMPTON, ADRAIN D MAWO 449.55 02009887A1 980631 BUSCH, FREDERICK W MAWO 525.50 02009914A1 981159 MUSSEHL, PATRICK A MAWO 514.34 02009923A1 973616 EDISON, DONALD MCWO 514.34 02009927A1 981182 MORALES, EVELYN MCWO 503.18 02009929A1 981160 ESKRIDGE, ISAIAH M MNRR 902.00 02009938A1 977209 EVANSEN, DAVID MAWO 569.43 02009944A1 981179 CELON, ANGEL AAA 462.00 02009945A1 981183 BARTOSIEWICZ, WILLIAM J MNAA 578.78 02009948A1 981163 BARRERA, MARIA G COWO 891.60 02009949A1 981164 MCGUINN, RUTH E MCWO 564.34 02009964A1 981165 SOLEM, KENT T MCWO 564.34 02010001 Al 981168 WILKINSON, JOAN V MCWO 558.76 02010031 Al 980866 SPAULDING, GARY H MAWO 434.76 02010041 Al 981169 BECKER, EDITH S MCWO 547.61 02010053A1 981170 COLEMAN, DIAMOND J MAWO 484.76 02010079A1 978985 KING, GLENS MAWO 375.09 02010167A1 981187 ONEILL, PHILIP MCWO 492.03 02010196A1 980417 SOTO-MARTINEZ, RAMONA Y MAWO 459.41 02010201 Al 981193 LYNAM, ALICE MCWO 519.92 02010206A1 981190 POLUBINSKY, JOSEPHINE B MCWO 497.61 02010298A1 970619 SCHERER, JESSICA MAWO 180.40 02010305A1 981196 IBRAHIM, ZEYNA M CMS 664.00 02010310A1 981198 LEMKE, MICHAEL R MNRR 182.08 02010330A1 980999 JONES, CAROL J MAWO 439.69 02010371A1 981200 ANDERSON, JACQUELINE MAWO 402.98 02010426A1 981202 KIRCHOFFNER, JOHN J MCWO 503.18 02010492A1 970127 NALEWAJA, PHILIP MCWO 386.24 02010506A1 975276 SAMPSON, JOHN MAWO 174.69 02010510A1 981207 KELLY, DANIEL MAWO 444.62 02010527A1 977740 GULDEN, JESSICA MAWO 429.83 02010547A1 976593 SCHUNEMAN, GEORGE MCWO 492.03 02010636A1 972550 HUGHES, BETTE MCWO 519.92 02010649A1 981214 HOLMES, DERRICK J MAWO 434.76 02010788A1 981228 POWERS, CAVERN D MAWO 474.90 02010792A1 981229 MCCLUSKEY, HELENS MCWO 497.61 02010800A1 981230 RANSOM, BEVERLY A MAWO 469.27 02010807A1 981180 HAMPTON, ADRAIN D MAWO 459.41 02010850A1 981231 STRIKER, MARJORIE MCWO 503.18 02010851A1 981232 SAMPSON, NAOMI T AAA 912.40 02010869A1 981234 HERGET, MARTHA A MCWO 386.24 02010901A1 981236 PRICE, JAY C MNRR 933.20 02010909A1 977474 BECKWITH, GEORGE MCWO 492.03 02010962A1 981238 ZELLMER, BEVERLY D MCWO 503.18 02011012A1 980980 JOHNSON, MELVIN R MAWO 519.92 02011019A1 972510 MOTTAZ, MARCELLA MCWO 508.76 02011046A1 981241 LETOURNEAU, GRACE K MCWO 453.41 02011092A1 980901 KELLEY, MAUD MCWO 525.50 02011135A1 974958 GLANCY, GORDON MCWO 531.07 9 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02011159A1 970023 PRESCOTT, MARSHALL MCWO 514.34 02011163A1 981262 WHITCOMB, CAROL J MCWO 514.34 02011194A1 981249 KRONGARD, ROSEANNE D TSI 910.40 02011264A1 981253 BALCKBURN, JUNE A MCWO 497.61 02011273A1 981282 FORSTNER, JERALDINE L MCWO 519.92 02011287A1 980901 KELLEY, MAUD MCWO 525.50 02011327A1 981251 HILLIER, FAYLYNN J MNRR 611.80 02011331A1 970801 TSCHIDA, MARIE A MAWO 429.83 02011356A1 981257 KATUSKY, BEATRICE R MCWO 503.18 02011389A1 980018 KELLER, ROBERT W MCWO 492.03 02011402A1 974699 PIKE, MILDRED MCWO 497.61 02011462A1 981263 MAHNKE, ARTHUR MCWO 492.03 02011501 Al 981269 SCHWEICH, FRANCIS G MCWO 503.18 02011503A1 981270 SCHICHEL, CARMEL MAWO 546.66 02011528A1 981272 BISPING, LISA MAWO 489.69 02011537A1 980415 RUPPERT, CAROL L MCWO 519.92 02011552A1 971672 EWING, REBA MCWO 503.18 02011566A1 981273 LEIGHTON, FREDERICK B MCWO 198.58 02011657A1 980816 SPANN, CHIQUILA R MAWO 469.27 02011663A1 975371 SCHWARTZ, PHYLLIS MCWO 402.98 02011669A1 981283 WESTON, HILDEGARD MCWO 519.92 02011682A1 981284 MEALEY, LEONARD MCWO 542.03 02011725A1 981288 SJODAHL, RUTH L MCWO 375.09 02011727A1 981257 KATUSKY, BEATRICE R MCWO 380.67 02011729A1 978806 HAAS, THEODORE A MCWO 503.18 02011747A1 981287 HOULE, LORRAINE J MCWO 542.03 02011809A1 970072 WALKER, DOLORES MCWO 375.09 02011816A1 981295 SWANSON, THEODORE W MCWO 492.03 02011841 Al 972513 STROMMER, HENRYS MCWO 198.58 02011858A1 981299 FONTAINE, CAROL A MCWO 514.34 02011859A1 981294 UPADRASHTA, KRISHNA V MAWO 569.43 02011902A1 981300 MORTERA, JOSE MNAA 668.20 02011909A1 980631 BUSCH, FREDERICK W MAWO 519.92 02011945A1 981304 LOCKHART, ALLEN MAWO 439.69 02011988A1 981303 ZINS, WILLIAM J MCWO 198.58 02012038A1 981309 JORDAN, TRACT MAWO 572.55 02012052A1 981092 SHOCKEY, MELISSA MNRR 165.90 02012083A1 981313 HERRICK, EMMA J MCWO 542.03 02012088A1 981314 RENTERIA, AMELIA MCWO 514.34 02012126A1 977209 EVANSEN, DAVID MCWO 514.34 02012134A1 974487 DIPERT, ELEONORE MCWO 441.42 02012137A1 981345 HANSEN, JOYCE M MCWO 391.82 02012196A1 981317 LESSARD, RICHARD J MCWO 492.03 02012199A1 981355 DAGASTINO, DARIO F MCWO 536.65 02012234A1 978301 HEDWALL, VIOLET F MAWO 519.92 02012259A1 981231 STRIKER, MARJORIE MCWO 492.03 02012266A1 981318 MAHMOOD, ALBERT MCWO 380.67 02012272A1 981322 ZASPEL, CONSTANCE P MCWO 492.03 02012286A1 981346 MORITZ, DUWAYN L MCWO 375.09 02012291 Al 976234 COPT, ALFRED MCWO 470.14 02012293A1 974884 EMRICK, ALICE MCWO 503.18 02012387A1 970023 PRESCOTT, MARSHALL MCWO 519.92 02012431 Al 981331 COOMBS, WARREN T MCWO 531.07 02012443A1 970038 BATTERSON, GARY H MCWO 525.50 02012563A1 981369 ANDERSON, RUTH M MCWO 386.24 02012574A1 980982 KUSZ, LLOYD F MCWO 198.58 02012575A1 981345 HANSEN, JOYCE M MCWO 508.76 02012597A1 981370 MCDONALD, CODY J MAWO 317.33 02012615A1 981341 HARRIS, JAVARIS D MAWO 459.41 02012636A1 971752 COTRONEO, ETHELYN MCWO 503.18 02012675A1 976157 FRENCHIK, ROBERT MCWO 547.81 02012695A1 981372 HOBBINS, HELEN M MCWO 391.82 02012696A1 981373 EDWARDS, ASHLEY M MAWO 174.34 02012699A1 981362 SOBKAWIAK, HELEN K MCWO 525.50 02012730A1 981361 ERNSTER, GERALD P MCWO 575.50 02012774A1 981375 ROACH, MARIE T MCWO 248.58 02012795A1 977948 EMERSON, RONALD MAWO 434.76 02012800A1 970344 JOHNSON, LAWRENCE MCWO 383.35 02012814A1 978579 HARRIS, DEANNA MAWO 454.48 02012881 Al 981377 ROBBINS, ELIZABETH W MCWO 525.50 02012890A1 981378 TURNER, RANDALL MAWO 444.62 02012896A1 972615 FERN, MARY JEAN MAWO 503.18 02012907A1 981380 HAUG, HELEN MCWO 514.34 02012908A1 981381 KOHLER, JULIA M MCWO 492.03 02012910A1 977361 DAUGS, JOYCE E MCWO 416.82 10 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02012930A1 981383 VALENCIA, RUBY M MCWO 525.50 02012952A1 981384 KESSLER, NANCY A MCWO 503.18 02012977A1 981385 YONEKAWA, TAE MCWO 411.24 02012978A1 981386 JACOBSEN, KATHARINE F MCWO 198.58 02012983A1 977813 SORENSEN, ROBERT MCWO 508.76 02013053A1 981392 BERGMAN, DUANE M MCWO 542.03 02013071A1 980958 WALDORF, TAMMY MAWO 49.53 02013074A1 981393 MCDONOUGH, WILLIAM J MCWO 198.58 02013085A1 981394 POWELL, TAMARA L MCWO 464.34 02013124A1 981395 GLUNZ, PAUL F MCWO 198.58 02013150A1 981429 TATRO, ROGER E MAWO 419.71 02013165A1 978012 MILANOVICH, ELIZABETH J MCWO 503.18 02013183A1 981430 OSCARSON, MAE E MCWO 386.24 02013208A1 981397 BRUMMOND, DOROTHY J MCWO 198.58 02013244A1 981401 SMEDLEY, RUBY M MCWO 553.18 02013251A1 980631 BUSCH, FREDERICK W MAWO 514.34 02013259A1 981414 OHMAN, GERALDINE A MCWO 553.18 02013278A1 981415 SCHWAB, DOUGLAS G MCWO 542.03 02013279A1 976038 KUBISZEWSKI, MELISSA MAWO 569.92 02013296A1 981417 KASTENS, MARJORIE A MCWO 514.34 02013306A1 972134 TIMM, WILLIAM MCWO 514.34 02013358A1 972513 STROMMER, HENRYS MCWO 94.81 02013365A1 981432 ERICKSON, JOAN B MCWO 375.09 02013380A1 973843 BORG, ARDIS M MAWO 182.48 02013407A1 981420 ENGFER, RITA MCWO 514.34 02013417A1 981421 FARRELL, PATRICK MAWO 198.58 02013461A1 978974 YANG, KIA MAWO 474.90 02013463A1 981425 JENSEN, ANDREW C MAWO 434.76 02013506A1 980711 KORNTOP, MARY A MCWO 519.92 02013539A1 981132 ZUBER, ALPHA R MCWO 508.76 02013596A1 981460 IVERSEN, MILDRED A MCWO 425.29 02013609A1 981439 BEBUS, LACY M MAWO 434.76 02013655A1 981446 KLEIN, DARROL L MCWO 558.76 02013734A1 981453 GREEN, THOMAS A MNRR 128.20 02013737A1 973695 LAPINSKI, JOSEPH C MCWO 514.34 02013751 Al 981454 HAMILTON, ABBY M MAWO 569.43 02013777A1 981455 RINER, LINDA J MAWO 449.55 02013797A1 971672 EWING, REBA MCWO 531.07 02013799A1 981463 RENANDER, ELDA I MCWO 425.29 02013814A1 981456 KRISMER, RICHARD W MCWO 569.92 02013847A1 981458 ENGERBRETSON, ANTHONY H MNAA 920.80 02013850A1 981459 SWANSON, KATHERINE M MCWO 248.58 02013884A1 971213 ALFORD, CONRAD MCWO 514.34 02013886A1 981465 XIONG, DAVID MNRR 162.71 02013887A1 981467 BEAUDETTE, ALPHONSE E OTHR 870.80 02013916A1 975371 SCHWARTZ, PHYLLIS MCWO 519.92 02013939A1 981406 PATTERSON, MARGARET MCWO 503.18 02014012A1 981469 SAVELA, RAYNOLD I MCWO 492.03 02014028A1 977910 JARVIS, MAVIS E MCWO 537.20 02014039A1 975014 GOETZ, LINDA MCWO 542.23 02014043A1 981412 TARUSCIO, AGNES L MCWO 477.57 02014052A1 970023 PRESCOTT, MARSHALL MCWO 519.92 02014056A1 978541 KING, BRANDY MAWO 444.62 02014062A1 981499 MONTES, ERIC MNRR 63.70 02014066A1 974111 BEATH, ANDREW MNAA 922.80 02014075A1 981413 KUSZ, BETTE A MAWO 198.58 02014131 Al 973809 BROOKS, PAULINE E MCWO 198.58 02014234A1 981500 SIGVERTSEN, DOUGLAS MCWO 402.98 02014321 Al 981489 SHEA, MONICA B MCWO 497.61 02014378A1 981502 ANDERSON, GRACE H MCWO 405.67 02014380A1 980399 KOWALSKI, LORRAINE A MCWO 492.03 02014399A1 981505 DUSTERHOFF, MARION B MCWO 119.81 02014441A1 971307 CORK, JAMES MAWO 503.18 02014449A1 975199 HEINECKE, HERMINE MCWO 531.07 02014479A1 978301 HEDWALL, VIOLET F MCWO 531.07 02014489A1 981493 PETERSON, STANLEY F MNAA 591.86 02014494A1 972325 MOES, SISTER DUANE MCWO 514.34 02014497A1 981494 HEDRICK, RAYMOND L MCWO 531.07 02014523A1 976359 SCHLADER, ANN MCWO 488.71 02014552A1 981510 ROONEY, CATHERINE A MCWO 547.61 02014553A1 981511 GALBRETH, CAROLE A MAWO 616.31 02014556A1 981512 KREIDERMACHER, CHRISTOPHER MAWO 189.48 02014574A1 981513 ESCH, MARGARET R MCWO 503.18 02014577A1 978903 MILLER, CLAUDIA J MAWO 519.92 02014581 Al 977156 HANSEN, BEULAH MCWO 115.61 11 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02014589A1 981514 HARTMAN, MICHELLE M BKWO 131.56 02014612A1 981516 FARRELL, WILLIAM H MCWO 558.76 02014748A1 981528 ALBRECHT, JAMES W MCWO 531.07 02014772A1 981530 PRICE, VIRGINIA R MCWO 536.65 02014773A1 981531 ROVNER, DAVID A MAWO 504.48 02014783A1 981533 OGBOIN, AYAERE Y MAWO 434.76 02014789A1 981536 JOHNSON, ROBERT D MCWO 248.58 02014791 Al 981537 ARNDT, REBECCA A MAWO 479.83 02014802A1 981538 WASHINGTON, JUSTIN D MAWO 147.48 02014819A1 981540 GARRICK, CIARA M MAWO 569.43 02014860A1 981362 SOBKAWIAK, HELEN K MCWO 519.92 02014871A1 980631 BUSCH, FREDERICK W MAWO 531.07 02014876A1 981547 XIONG, SHENG MCWO 575.50 02014899A1 981548 GALBRAITH, KART A MNRR 902.00 02014900A1 981550 SUITER, DOROTHY M MCWO 497.61 02014917A1 981551 ORTHMEYER, RICHARD G MNRR 188.32 02014968A1 981554 OCONNELL, JOAN M MCWO 119.81 02015031 Al 980982 KUSZ, LLOYD F MCWO 198.58 02015039A1 981579 SANSBURN, SHAWN D MNRR 657.80 02015048A1 972513 STROMMER, HENRYS MCWO 94.81 02015057A1 981557 ANDREASON, ELIZABETH E MCWO 492.02 02015066A1 972630 BEAULIEU, SHIRLEY MCWO 497.61 02015072A1 981345 HANSEN, JOYCE M MCWO 525.50 02015090A1 980519 SHEFFIELD, RENEE A MAWO 508.76 02015094A1 981560 KRINKE, SEAN M MNRR 180.40 02015119A1 981563 JARA, RUTH C MCWO 503.18 02015149A1 977633 DEIMAN, PATRICIA MCWO 531.07 02015155A1 981580 BROWN, ZABRINA C MAWO 144.76 02015184A1 981567 STARK, WALTER W MCWO 198.58 02015212A1 981584 MCADOO, DAWN M MAWO 199.34 02015284A1 981576 RADAR, CECILE M MCWO 531.07 02015292A1 981577 REIMERS, LORRAINE MCWO 198.58 02015315A1 981595 SANDERS, CARLENA D MAWO 449.55 02015319A1 981596 HAMRE, RONALD D MCWO 519.92 02015330A1 981597 WATSON, AUDREY C MCWO 497.59 02015343A1 977486 ROMAN, PAMELA MCWO 531.07 02015345A1 981586 WIKSTROM, DENISE G OTHR 1,014.40 02015348A1 977740 GULDEN, JESSICA MAWO 434.76 02015350A1 981587 HOULE, ELLEN M MAWO 144.76 02015369A1 974798 EIDL, HALIMA MAWO 444.62 02015391 Al 980038 ROSEN, MILDRED P MCWO 492.03 02015392A1 981588 JORISSEN, MARY KAY K MCWO 380.67 02015425A1 972789 FOSTER, ESTHER MCWO 373.22 02015444A1 981590 ROSENWINKEL, DOROTHY E MCWO 508.76 02015447A1 981591 SKEETE, ROBERT MAWO 159.90 02015453A1 981593 HOBSON, QUONTREL MAWO 566.31 02015457A1 971120 GUETSCHOFF, ELMER C MCWO 519.92 02015458A1 981714 ANDERSON, MYRTLE A MCWO 198.58 02015464A1 981592 NELSON, MARY P MCWO 531.07 02015496A1 981159 MUSSEHL, PATRICK A MAWO 508.76 02015501 Al 974699 PIKE, MILDRED MCWO 536.65 02015509A1 981600 STELLA, MARIANO J MCWO 477.57 02015510A1 981601 AYALA, ERIKA MAWO 429.83 02015518A1 981602 KIRKCONNELL, ROBERT K MCWO 508.75 02015636A1 977110 JOHNSON, JAMES K MNRR 870.80 02015650A1 981676 FRAME, JOSEFA MCWO 492.03 02015660A1 981610 REIL, JEAN C MCWO 531.07 02015694A1 980631 BUSCH, FREDERICK W MAWO 525.50 02015710A1 981612 NEIL, JANE A MCWO 503.18 02015718A1 981614 GULLICKSON, ROBERT S MCWO 198.58 02015721 Al 981615 BENEKE, DONALD H MCWO 198.58 02015758A1 981616 MARKS, TAVION D MAWO 169.76 02015779A1 981618 MILLER, MALORA L MAWO 424.90 02015782A1 972513 STROMMER, HENRYS MCWO 94.81 02015841 Al 972615 FERN, MARY JEAN MCWO 503.18 02015850A1 981619 ROTTER, THERESA M MCWO 198.58 02015852A1 981620 HEFTA, DONALD L MCWO 248.58 02015924A1 981622 CURTIS, HARLAN L MCWO 492.03 02015927A1 981623 TIMMONS, LORRAINE MCWO 558.76 02015943A1 981625 STEEPEN, DELORES E MCWO 492.03 02016046A1 972177 FOHRENKAMM, PHYLLIS MCWO 468.29 02016050A1 981650 DAVIS, EMMANUEL MAWO 164.48 02016055A1 981629 BUKREY, EDWARD J MCWO 542.03 02016078A1 978301 HEDWALL, VIOLET F MCWO 531.07 02016081 Al 972550 HUGHES, BETTE MCWO 497.61 12 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02016113A1 981630 RYKEL, THOMAS M MNRR 983.20 02016187A1 981637 DAILEY, JERIMIAH J MNRR 283.20 02016200A1 981638 LEE, HEBREW MAWO 619.43 02016214A1 981639 TINGSTAD, GORDON MCWO 492.03 02016223A1 976218 ANDERSON, FLORENCE MCWO 380.67 02016254A1 981640 WASHINGTON, REGINALD MNRR 983.20 02016289A1 979248 BLANCK, GARY J MCWO 503.18 02016295A1 981644 CLAUSON, THOMAS G MAWO 424.90 02016335A1 981671 GARRITY, ALICE M MCWO 503.18 02016370A1 981346 MORITZ, DUWAYN L MCWO 503.18 02016375A1 977813 SORENSEN, ROBERT MCWO 391.82 02016382A1 981652 THOMAS, SCOTT J WCWO 90.24 02016387A1 981653 KOBZAR, TABITA V MAWO 479.83 02016401 Al 977679 WOLD, VIRGINIA MCWO 488.71 02016436A1 981657 LOUGHREY, MARY E MCWO 119.81 02016480A1 970038 BATTERSON, GARY H MCWO 492.03 02016485A1 981656 MCKENZIE, CLAUDE O MCWO 248.58 02016542A1 979008 SACCO, CATHERINE MCWO 492.03 02016600A1 981345 HANSEN, JOYCE M MCWO 508.76 02016616A1 972550 HUGHES, BETTE MCWO 492.03 02016623A1 981658 SAMMON, LADONNA M MCWO 586.65 02016633A1 978264 SKAAR, SOPHIE A MCWO 503.18 02016634A1 972977 EKLOF, BERNICE MCWO 514.34 02016659A1 981652 THOMAS, SCOTT J WCWO 132.18 02016669A1 981660 SALAAM, SHAHID MNAA 920.80 02016687A1 973827 RANSOM, BEVERLY MAWO 459.41 02016703A1 981664 MASLOWSKI, ELEANOR M MCWO 198.58 02016721A1 981665 HICKS, EBONY L MAWO 625.67 02016752A1 981159 MUSSEHL, PATRICK A MCWO 508.76 02016753A1 981673 EBERHARD, ARLENE R MCWO 94.81 02016756A1 981667 HARMS, MARGARET V MCWO 608.96 02016757A1 981668 DUNNORM, NICHAEL T MAWO 144.76 02016760A1 981670 MOEN, JASON S MCWO 400.09 02016809A1 981679 SULLIVAN, THERESA M MCWO 380.67 02016810A1 972510 MOTTAZ, MARCELLA MCWO 508.76 02016853A1 974110 KAYSER, JAMES MCWO 414.13 02016854A1 981683 DANIELSON, BRIAN S MAWO 139.83 02016868A1 981718 BRILLA, LAVERNE M MCWO 503.18 02016902A1 981685 KHURIYE, ANAB H MNAA 922.80 02016922A1 974699 PIKE, MILDRED MCWO 542.23 02016993A1 981693 BROWN, JANE MAWO 169.41 02017008A1 981688 BURNETT, DAVID M WCWO 141.24 02017029A1 981690 PAYSON, ESTHER M MCWO 542.03 02017045A1 981694 ZIMMERMAN, ARTHUR C MCWO 503.18 02017051 Al 971338 SASS, CALVIN MCWO 198.58 02017074A1 981695 MCNEILLY, HELLEN D MCWO 571.20 02017110A1 980673 HATFIELD, MARY V MCWO 198.58 02017228A1 981406 PATTERSON, MARGARET MCWO 492.03 02017274A1 981701 MCDERMOTT, MARY K MAWO 553.83 02017317A1 981703 LIEFSCHULTZ, HAROLD A MCWO 569.91 02017318A1 981729 FEHRMAN, SHIRLEE J MCWO 402.98 02017324A1 981704 BILOTTA, ELSIE I MCWO 508.76 02017340A1 981706 KING, DENQUEAY MAWO 454.48 02017376A1 981693 BROWN, JANE MAWO 464.34 02017378A1 978511 MASON, ELSIE S MCWO 198.58 02017384A1 981709 HAGEN, ROXANNE J MNRR 428.40 02017391A1 981711 ORTMEIER, JENNIFER A MAWO 444.62 02017406A1 975073 MCCLUSKEY, WILLIAM MCWO 386.24 02017437A1 981719 FEEDER, MARCELLUS M MNAA 912.40 02017450A1 981639 TINGSTAD, GORDON MCWO 492.03 02017459A1 976511 JOHNSON, GLADYS MCWO 508.76 02017460A1 981722 BARTSCH, MARY S MCWO 503.18 02017461 Al 973185 HAINES, ELSIE MCWO 519.92 02017465A1 981723 HALL, EDWARD J MCWO 542.02 02017470A1 980731 RIVARD, RICHARD F MCWO 508.76 02017508A1 981724 LOCKREM, QUENTIN M MCWO 514.34 02017541 Al 981725 BECKMAN, EMMET H MCWO 514.33 02017562A1 973573 SMITH, EVELYN MCWO 198.58 02017629A1 970454 LITTLE, HARRY MCWO 503.18 02017632A1 981734 DANIELS, JERMAINE MAWO 164.48 02017634A1 981748 COGNETTA, MARIE A MCWO 397.40 02017637A1 981735 MANN, RAYMOND H MCWO 484.32 02017658A1 977447 BUCKLEY, JEANNINE MCWO 525.50 02017664A1 981737 PINE, CALVIN MAWO 519.27 02017683A1 981742 PRETTNER, RUTH M MCWO 497.61 13 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02017694A1 981743 STIEWE, GERHILD G MCWO 536.65 02017760A1 981751 FITZGERALD, MILES J MCWO 198.58 02017771 Al 976278 SMITH, STANLEY MCWO 492.02 02017781A1 971008 ZEIMET, BERNARD MAWO 439.69 02017809A1 981756 HAUSAM, JOY M MNRR 568.48 02017814A1 981781 PAGEL, GORDON R MCWO 119.81 02017818A1 976588 STORKAMP, JEAN E MCWO 519.92 02017838A1 981750 HOLLERBACH, BETTY E MCWO 547.59 02017848A1 977003 HOLMAN, RUTH MCWO 514.34 02017857A1 981747 MIKKELSEN, EMERGINE D MCWO 503.18 02017868A1 970034 VAUGHAN, FLORENCE M MCWO 386.24 02017875A1 978485 HESS, BARYON L MAWO 182.48 02017932A1 977630 ANDERSON, MARGARET MCWO 402.98 02017996A1 974110 KAYSER, JAMES MCWO 542.23 02017997A1 977453 MCKAY, ARLIENE MCWO 375.09 02018034A1 981760 LEEDAHL, ERIC P MNRR 915.60 02018048A1 980818 ENG, CLYDE W MCWO 503.18 02018061 Al 981761 GARCIA, RUDOLPH E MCWO 586.64 02018066A1 981762 OSTEDT, MARJORIE J MCWO 248.58 02018078A1 981763 GIMPEL, BEVERLY A MCWO 553.18 02018079A1 970843 LAFOND, ROLAND MCWO 94.81 02018123A1 981778 FISHER, SANDRA F MAWO 449.55 02018136A1 971338 SASS, CALVIN MCWO 198.58 02018137A1 981788 GILLAN, MIALICKI T TSI 668.20 02018141A1 981778 FISHER, SANDRA F MAWO 449.55 02018160A1 981776 COOK, MARIE L MCWO 525.48 02018191 Al 971870 PEN K, LAURA MCWO 380.66 02018192A1 970686 NALEWAJA, MARY MCWO 508.75 02018193A1 981853 CIHAK, LEROY J MCWO 519.91 02018199A1 981791 ALTHOFF, ARDELL M MCWO 198.58 02018210A1 981793 WICKSTROM, ROBERT J MCWO 531.07 02018218A1 973915 DREAWVES, ERNEST A MCWO 581.07 02018235A1 981794 TRAHAN, DAVID MAWO 514.34 02018267A1 981615 BENEKE, DONALD H MCWO 198.58 02018279A1 981802 LAVELY, FRANCES MCWO 198.58 02018289A1 981803 DEGROAT, FLOYD F CMS 912.40 02018328A1 980699 VINESKI, RITA A MCWO 514.33 02018364A1 981807 BLACK, SHEILA S CMS 920.80 02018384A1 981810 EHNSTROM, BERNADINE MCWO 519.91 02018453A1 981815 BROSKY, MARGARET A MCWO 503.18 02018492A1 981821 BURGESS, LANCE L MAWO 484.76 02018502A1 981822 SAUERBREY, MARJOLANE L MCWO 519.91 02018505A1 981861 GRANLUND, ELIZABETH M MCWO 503.18 02018516A1 981824 KEATH, ANGELA R MNRR 591.20 02018559A1 971845 TURBES, REGINA MCWO 508.75 02018580A1 981828 BACH, JEROME C MCWO 380.66 02018586A1 972615 FERN, MARY JEAN MCWO 508.75 02018597A1 981829 GRUNDHOFER, SHARON J MCWO 408.55 02018599A1 981830 LYONS, DENNIS TSI 891.60 02018620A1 981831 MEYER, BONITA M MCWO 542.02 02018625A1 976471 KUBITSCHEK, ANN M MCWO 198.58 02018629A1 981856 COURNOYER, MILFORD A MCWO 503.18 02018663A1 981832 LAPINSKI, GLORIA B MCWO 542.22 02018678A1 981875 VOSS, DOROTHY M MCWO 391.82 02018719A1 981835 YANG, TOU BKWO 660.40 02018725A1 981836 MAHONEY, WILLIAM J MCWO 466.42 02018727A1 972455 WHITE, DOROTHY MCWO 525.48 02018729A1 976132 REUSSE, MEG MAWO 434.76 02018782A1 981841 ORTMEIER, MARJORIE C MCWO 525.48 02018796A1 981842 GOSSELIN, GEORGE F MCWO 497.59 02018825A1 981843 LOR, MOR MAWO 474.90 02018831A1 981845 MCQUILLAN, COLIN M MAWO 504.48 02018840A1 981846 POKORNY, BEVERLY MCWO 503.18 02018847A1 981847 ONEILL, MARIE MCWO 492.02 02018853A1 981848 HOLMAN, MARGARET MCWO 503.18 02018857A1 978920 LEHMAN, THOMAS R MAWO 434.76 02018876A1 981563 JARA, RUTH C MCWO 497.59 02018894A1 973662 KEEFE, JOY MAWO 459.41 02018942A1 975714 EBERHARDT, KATHERINE MCWO 503.18 02018968A1 981863 WOOD, DAVID R MCWO 519.91 02018975A1 981890 AN FANG, ARTHUR E MNAA 941.60 02019004A1 981866 AMMERMANN, RYAN P MNAA 164.90 02019047A1 981864 RIDLEY, RUSSELL C MAWO 454.48 02019049A1 981869 BRUNNER, CHERYL L AAA 931.20 02019050A1 976083 MOBERG, PEARL MCWO 492.02 14 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02019063A1 981873 LEGATO, ADELLE F MCWO 248.58 02019077A1 976251 SCHMIDT, DOSLYN MCWO 531.07 02019153A1 982133 LENIHAN, GRACE MCWO 497.59 02019163A1 981841 ORTMEIER, MARJORIE C MCWO 491.43 02019184A1 982134 MURPHY, PATSY M MAWO 454.48 02019192A1 981881 GRAHAM, SARAH A MAWO 494.62 02019219A1 981883 LOCKE, ROBERT D MCWO 497.59 02019220A1 972626 LONG, RUSSELL MCWO 198.58 02019245A1 981159 MUSSEHL, PATRICK A MCWO 503.18 02019252A1 981913 GOERTZEN, DELORES J MCWO 531.07 02019275A1 973896 LIPINSKI, JOYCE MCWO 503.18 02019283A1 981943 GERVAIS, BELLE M MCWO 94.81 02019365A1 981425 JENSEN, ANDREW C MAWO 459.41 02019367A1 981894 MARS, ROSE L MCWO 414.14 02019395A1 975085 THIBAULT, ROBERT MCWO 188.50 02019420A1 977563 ERICKSON, JAMES W MCWO 503.18 02019434A1 981898 LONG, DONALD J MCWO 553.37 02019458A1 981900 PECCHIA, JOHN V MCWO 492.02 02019463A1 978799 BENSON, VERNUS A MCWO 492.02 02019488A1 981902 GUSTAFSON, JACQUELINE L MCWO 492.02 02019517A1 976083 MOBERG, PEARL MCWO 492.02 02019519A1 981942 ARENS, HENRIETTA A MCWO 564.33 02019525A1 981904 DAVIS, JORGE A MCWO 434.76 02019529A1 981915 LEINO, MARGARET MCWO 380.66 02019533A1 981159 MUSSEHL, PATRICK A MCWO 503.18 02019534A1 981906 DIGAETANO, MAE J MCWO 553.18 02019549A1 981907 TAYLOR, ANDREW L MAWO 179.62 02019554A1 981908 HALL, ANTOINETTE A MCWO 470.14 02019562A1 973820 HELGESON, SHIRLEY MNRR 881.20 02019612A1 980148 WAGNER, RITA M MCWO 618.03 02019630A1 981920 FOREMAN, CHARLENE A MCWO 586.85 02019685A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 459.41 02019749A1 981935 HARLEY, DOROTHY E MCWO 492.02 02019793A1 981938 HALLERAN, ELIZABETH J MNRR 185.90 02019813A1 971537 ANDERSON, SOPHIA MCWO 198.58 02019833A1 975371 SCHWARTZ, PHYLLIS MCWO 525.48 02019856A1 981945 KENNEDY, RUBY MCWO 238.65 02019860A1 981140 GITZEN, JOSEPHINE A MCWO 386.25 02019885A1 981948 MAYER, MARY MCWO 419.71 02019900A1 981949 YOBBIE, GENEVIEVE MCWO 492.02 02019912A1 981951 NEUMAN, LORRAINE MCWO 519.91 02019914A1 972750 FRANKLIN, ALICE MCWO 519.91 02019930A1 981953 SEGLER, BARBARA S MCWO 508.75 02019946A1 981202 KIRCHOFFNER, JOHN J MCWO 386.25 02019951 Al 981530 PRICE, VIRGINIA R MCWO 536.64 02019952A1 981954 TURNER, MICHAEL J MAWO 469.27 02019954A1 972630 BEAULIEU, SHIRLEY MCWO 497.59 02019962A1 970843 LAFOND, ROLAND MCWO 198.58 02019968A1 973976 WHALEY, WILLIAM MCWO 514.33 02019974A1 978067 ROSEN, ISADORE MCWO 519.91 02019979A1 981957 LARSEN, ELMER K MCWO 503.18 02019982A1 981959 DIPPEL, MARIE C MCWO 581.07 02020029A1 972239 ZAHN, TAMMY OTHR 0.24 02020114A1 981873 LEGATO, ADELLE F MCWO 248.58 02020120A1 981983 MAGLICH, NESTOR MCWO 534.99 02020142A1 981989 LIBERTY, KENNETH P MCWO 455.87 02020154A1 982007 PEDERSON, CHARLES R MCWO 386.25 02020165A1 982027 SWANSON, KEELY J MCWO 408.55 02020171A1 981975 FULLERTON, WILLIAM S MCWO 497.59 02020173A1 981990 KUNDE, MARGARET F MCWO 408.55 02020184A1 981976 CLARITY, MICHAEL J MCWO 531.07 02020189A1 979262 REID, ERICK C MCWO 525.48 02020245A1 981915 LEINO, MARGARET MCWO 503.18 02020251 Al 981978 STANOCH, EDWARD A MCWO 508.75 02020286A1 970704 OTTESON, JOSEPHINE MCWO 375.09 02020310A1 981981 YANG, JACOB C MAWO 494.62 02020338A1 981991 SWANSON, MARY E MNAA 962.40 02020361 Al 970148 SMITH, SHELDON MCWO 503.18 02020408A1 981996 SIANKO, MARY JANE MCWO 248.58 02020410A1 981997 RICE, EDNA M MCWO 503.18 02020413A1 980415 RUPPERT, CAROL L MCWO 503.18 02020444A1 982003 PRILL, MARLENE G MCWO 492.02 02020516A1 982004 STUBER, EMILIE M MNRR 910.40 02020518A1 981493 PETERSON, STANLEY F MNAA 591.86 02020524A1 982006 SEAHOLM, LARRY MCWO 466.42 15 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02020532A1 982011 MALCOLM, ETHYLE D MCWO 198.58 02020537A1 982017 HOFFMAN, LORI A MNAA 497.40 02020581 Al 972550 HUGHES, BETTE MCWO 519.91 02020618A1 982014 BAAY, ARLENE J MCWO 592.22 02020625A1 982020 GUIBAULT, VERNON D MCWO 198.58 02020630A1 982136 CAHANES, LUCILLE M MCWO 450.29 02020650A1 982022 RAMIREZ, ADRIEL C MNRR 401.40 02020654A1 982024 KERL, SHARON K MCWO 94.81 02020663A1 982023 MILLER, MERLIN J MCWO 503.18 02020675A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 464.34 02020712A1 977267 GRESBACK, CECILIA MCWO 386.25 02020761A1 976329 RINEHART, ALISON MAWO 464.34 02020834A1 982032 ECKSTROM, CLARENCE W MCWO 497.59 02020867A1 982034 BOSTON, LAVON R MAWO 509.41 02020897A1 982035 MCCOY, APRIL M MAWO 459.41 02020921 Al 982037 MCMICHAEL, CARLENE M MCWO 542.02 02020931A1 975123 CARSON, DANIEL MAWO 449.55 02020935A1 982038 LANG, JESSIE L MCWO 519.91 02020943A1 976577 MCKENZIE, MARGARET MCWO 519.91 02021001A1 982043 COSSITOR, ANGELA M CMS 182.08 02021023A1 971757 SCHEID, ALVIN A MCWO 575.48 02021031 Al 982044 DWYER, WILLIAM E MNAA 900.00 02021086A1 982046 KUBES, PHYLLIS I MCWO 508.75 02021095A1 981900 PECCHIA, JOHN V MCWO 503.18 02021107A1 982049 IVERSON, DOLORES J MCWO 461.44 02021132A1 982048 LINDSTROM, STELLA L MCWO 492.42 02021159A1 982055 SAVAGE, NICHOLAS MCWO 391.79 02021196A1 982054 MOUA, JESSICA L MAWO 434.76 02021220A1 982057 TRAN, CHO T TSI 891.60 02021222A1 982058 REIL, GLODIA S MCWO 519.91 02021240A1 972456 ESCH, HERBERT MCWO 391.82 02021245A1 970348 SLEVA, DOROTHY MCWO 503.18 02021311A1 982065 BLOOD, LAURICE T MCWO 508.75 02021339A1 982061 BROOKS, PAULETTE I MCWO 503.18 02021342A1 982062 FARMER, NANCY C MCWO 492.02 02021349A1 972070 MOSTAD, GERTRUDE M MCWO 198.58 02021350A1 981883 LOCKE, ROBERT D MCWO 503.18 02021354A1 978553 KLEIN, ERIN M MAWO 464.34 02021410A1 974339 EGGERT, MARJORIE MCWO 198.58 02021418A1 982098 STROMQUIST, TREVOR J MNRR 616.20 02021430A1 982069 JOHANNSEN, DANIEL D MAWO 514.34 02021442A1 976097 ORR, LUELLA MCWO 419.71 02021446A1 982070 DAHLIN, ALICE L MCWO 492.02 02021482A1 982074 ECKERT, IONE M MCWO 514.33 02021506A1 974056 ROWE, WILLARD MCWO 94.81 02021552A1 981369 ANDERSON, RUTH M MCWO 503.18 02021556A1 976573 GRUNZ, JONATHAN M MAWO 424.90 02021557A1 982099 VANG, SONG MAWO 144.76 02021561 Al 970987 KELCHER, ROSE MCWO 198.58 02021572A1 982100 LASURE, MARGARET C MCWO 94.81 02021598A1 980982 KUSZ, LLOYD F MCWO 198.58 02021606A1 980514 SANDQUIST, STANLEY MCWO 492.02 02021620A1 982087 ROSE, BRYSE A MAWO 509.41 02021645A1 974884 EMRICK, ALICE MCWO 380.66 02021676A1 982092 COOPER, PALMALIN M MNAA 591.73 02021702A1 982093 PETERSON, JEANNINE MCWO 419.00 02021711A1 982094 LOOMER, JOYCE MCWO 508.75 02021736A1 980757 STACHOWIAK, RICHARD J MCWO 542.02 02021742A1 982104 FONTAINE, LLOYD A MCWO 514.33 02021765A1 982107 ARMOND, ARISTINA A MNRR 616.20 02021790A1 981081 LYON, CARDINAL G MCWO 497.59 02021798A1 981257 KATUSKY, BEATRICE R MCWO 503.18 02021835A1 982110 STIPE, ANNAMARIA MCWO 553.37 02021889A1 982128 WALLER, HELEN L MCWO 444.71 02021895A1 981231 STRIKER, MARJORIE MCWO 386.25 02021901A1 982116 DAVID, JEANNE L MCWO 525.48 02021931 Al 980123 BRITHINE, MARIE MCWO 514.33 02021945A1 976257 OHARA, MARION MCWO 488.51 02021955A1 982118 BOUDREAU, JAMES D MNRR 600.48 02021992A1 982119 MOELLER, GERALDINE MCWO 519.91 02022027A1 982129 CURTIS, TIMOTHY J MNAA 126.56 02022029A1 977830 JOHNSON, WINNIFRED L MCWO 492.02 02022033A1 982120 NIX, LASHONDA MAWO 499.55 02022034A1 976566 BERGGREN, EDITH MCWO 497.59 02022044A1 982121 OSTLUND, CHARLOTTE M MCWO 492.88 16 Call Number Account # Patient/Account Name Schedule Balance 02022067A1 970674 LEE, RHODA MCWO 492.02 02022077A1 980782 SWANSON, CARL H MCWO 519.91 02022145A1 976789 KLEIN, DONALD MCWO 375.09 02022155A1 982145 MARAZZO, FRANCES L MCWO 198.58 02022157A1 971787 RYAN, ROBERT K MCWO 484.99 02022164A1 982065 BLOOD, LAURICE T MCWO 497.59 02022230A1 982120 NIX, LASHONDA MAWO 164.48 02022236A1 982139 MANGUM, CHARLENE MAWO 439.69 02022244A1 982142 BEZANSON, MARGARET D MCWO 553.37 02022291 Al 981615 BENEKE, DONALD H MCWO 198.58 02022307A1 970458 SPREEMAN, BEVERLY MCWO 508.75 02022323A1 972550 HUGHES, BETTE MCWO 531.07 02022326A1 978452 DIEBEL, CRAIG A MCWO 542.22 02022449A1 982154 YANG, MEE MAWO 459.41 02022451 Al 978662 PETERSON, GLADYS M MCWO 491.43 02022455A1 972419 WREN, MARK MAWO 90.20 02022501A1 982157 FAYNE, KALVIN J MAWO 439.69 02022503A1 982158 GEER, EVELYN N MCWO 503.18 02022515A1 982159 GIANNACCINI, SOPHIE F MCWO 198.58 02022516A1 982160 HAMLIN, ALICE M MCWO 491.88 02022542A1 980698 KINGSLEY, ALBIRTY MCWO 519.91 02022583A1 982164 BROWN, JOHN H MAWO 439.69 02022595A1 982165 MARSEGLIA, VITO MCWO 531.07 02022604A1 981953 SEGLER, BARBARA S MCWO 408.55 02022610A1 980199 METZ, DOROTHY H MCWO 508.75 02022645A1 982166 JACK, DANIELLE S CMS 931.20 02022658A1 974704 TIMMERS, FRANCES MCWO 508.75 02022684A1 982167 OLIVER, HARRY O MCWO 198.58 02022691A1 982168 AVERY, LOUANN MNRR 920.80 02022696A1 982170 OLSON, SHIRLEY A MCWO 536.44 02022705A1 982173 JOBE, LORNA B MCWO 564.33 02022725A1 982174 KIRCH, ROBERT C MCWO 503.18 02022727A1 978028 VINGERS, GEORGE MCWO 497.59 02022738A1 982176 WILLIS, JACK E MCWO 503.18 02022759A1 982182 JOHNSON, CLYDE MCWO 425.29 02022762A1 982183 JEFFRIES, EISIAH MAWO 454.48 02022767A1 982185 WATKINS, DELIA A MAWO 154.62 02022769A1 982186 MUELLER, JEAN F MCWO 541.88 02022776A1 978520 LYONS, CAROLYN MAWO 439.69 02022785A1 982187 KLOSE, TONYA M WCWO 92.43 02022787A1 978643 RAINES JR., CARL N MNRR 920.80 02022836A1 982192 MEYERS, DOROTHY E MCWO 436.77 02022837A1 982190 JOHNSON, JOCELYN A MAWO 174.34 02022838A1 972510 MOTTAZ, MARCELLA MCWO 386.25 02022842A1 982120 NIX, LASHONDA MAWO 439.69 02022877A1 976301 MCCOOK, BRIAN M MNRR 891.60 02022889A1 982197 BOWLES, VERA A MAWO 429.83 02022904A1 982198 SIEGEL, KAREN M MNAA 186.24 02022934A1 982205 TRUDEAU, LORRAINE MCWO 525.48 02022964A1 970619 SCHERER, JESSICA MAWO 37.79 02022974A1 982204 HEIR, DONALD C MCWO 248.58 02023028A1 982180 LUEBESMIER, ERVIN C MCWO 94.81 02023048A1 982181 ESCABEZ, TERESA A MAWO 439.69 01006459AA1 978251 HASSAN, YURUB MNAA 183.15 02001253AA1 980480 WILSON, VENAYE P MNRR 226.20 02001253CA1 980482 WILSON, NICOLE D MAWO 22.47 02002154AA1 980567 TAING, SAMNAG MAWO 530.83 02003506BA1 980690 ROBERSON, ALONZO MNRR 920.80 02004592CA1 980764 FERNOW, DANIEL A DECE 94.16 02006421AA1 980908 LICHTENBERG, ANTHONY N MAWO 9.86 02006846AA1 980960 HAMMONS, LAQUANDA COWO 647.40 02007954AA1 981259 ARAB, DAHIR F OTHR 321.60 02007973AA1 981036 NOEL, SAQUARE L MNRR 334.10 02012355AA1 981326 STRONG, JEREMY L MNRR 352.80 02012355BA1 981347 FOX, SAMANTHA M BKWO 334.10 02015210BA1 981583 SEIBURE, ERICA Y MNRR 321.60 02015524AA1 981605 MCCLAIN, JOSHUA E MAWO 163.19 02015524BA1 981607 POWELL, RA SHAD R MAWO 163.19 02019594AA1 981918 MOSZER, BETTY L MCWO 67.02 02019594BA1 981919 MOSZER, EDWARD J MCWO 67.02 02021485AA1 982075 LEDMAN, LYNDSEY M MNRR 481.20 02022256BA1 982144 BROWN, SILIVINANN TSI 481.20 Total Account Balances for this Report: $457,156.53 17 BKWO CO WO/CMS/TS I/AAA DECE MAWO MCWO MNRR/MNAA OTHR VAWO WCWO Call Category Summary Bankruptcy Write Off 2,813.85 Collections Write Off 28,406.50 Deceased Write Off 282.48 Medical Assistance Write Off 113,282.67 Medicare 245,272.55 MN Revenue Recapture Program 61,148.25 Miscellaneous Balances 4,260.99 Veterans Write Off 291.00 Workers' Comp Write Off 1,398.24 Total $457,156.53 18 AGENDA NO. G-5 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: Assessments for Unpaid Ambulance Bills for 2003-2004 DATE: December 7, 2004 PROPOSAL It is proposed that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $10,071.40 of unpaid ambulance bills as special assessments for collection with 2005 property taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one year. BACKGROUND Annually in December special assessments are levied for unpaid ambulance bills on property within Ramsey County. During the past 12 months letters were sent to individuals that had unpaid ambulance bills. The letters indicated that the balance due for ambulance services along with 8% interest would be added to their 2005 property taxes if payment was not made within 30 days. In response to these letters, payments and/or insurance data were received. For the remaining unpaid bills, property records were reviewed to confirm that the property owner name matched the ambulance service customer name. There were 19 matches and these are listed on the attachment for certification. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted to certify $10,071.40 of unpaid ambulance bills as special assessments for collection with 2005 property taxes with interest at the rate of eight percent on the total amount for one year. P\agn\assessments amb_bills ~ RESOLUTION RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached ambulance service charges totaling $10,071.40 for collection with the taxes of said property owner for the year 2004, collectible in 2005 with interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year. P\agn\assessments amb_bills 2 c~ N13Od i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ad3Od i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i Ad3Od i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i dflOdd i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i AtlOXd 1NWXd • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • aNfltld C .~ • ~~~i p ^ J aiNli aiwtli NaaAi • aAisi ~atldi ~~ ., :, ~wdsi J a~dsi AGENDA NO. G-6 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman City Manager FROM: Sherrie Le Human Resource Director RE: Group Insurance Contracts DATE: November 21, 2004 We recently went through our annual renewal process for employee insurance benefits. We accepted formal bids on just dental this year. We also received and reviewed renewal proposals from all other existing carriers. The Insurance Labor-Management Committee met and discussed providers, rates, and benefit levels. A$er much discussion and some negotiation by our insurance agent with various providers, the LMC proposed the following changes effective January 1, 2005: Health Insurance: We propose to continue with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. Most benefits did not change; however, there are a few mandatory changes to their pharmacy benefit. A$er negotiations, they agreed to reduce their rates considerably below the rate cap in place from the prior year. The rates will increase by 9.5% over 2004 rates. Dental Insurance: We reviewed competitive bids from several carriers and decided to stay with MetLife Dental. MetLife agreed to reduce their rates considerably over their initial proposal and agreed to offer a two-year rate guarantee. Long-term Care: We propose to continue our long-term care insurance contract with CNA through a pool affiliated with the League of Minnesota Cities. There is no change to the rates. Long-term and Short-term Disability We propose to continue our long- and short-term disability insurance with Assurant (formerly Fortis) through a pool affiliated with the League of Minnesota Cities. Their rates will remain the same for 2005. Life Insurance: We are proposing to continue with Minnesota Life through a pool affiliated with the League of MN Cities. The rate for basic life insurance will increase by $.Ol per $1000 coverage. There will be no increase to optional employee supplemental life, spouse life or dependent life rates. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Insurance Labor-Management Committee recommendations to be effective January 1, 2005. Agenda G-7 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief DATE: December 6, 2004 SUBJECT: New Vehicle Introduction Due to the change in the way we will be delivery paramedic services in 2005, we need to purchase one new four-wheel drive vehicle. We have received two bids; one from White Bear Dodge for $22,990 and one from Lake Elmo Chrysler for $22,900. We are looking at purchasing a 2004 Dodge Durango that will be given to the fire marshal and his 2000 Ford Expedition will be used as the new night paramedic vehicle. The reason for the switch is the need for a bigger vehicle due to the equipment they carry and the need for four- wheel drive. Recommendation I recommend that the City Council approve the purchase of the 2004 Dodge Durango from Lake Elmo Chrysler in the amount of $22,900. The money for the purchase of this vehicle is available in the 2004 budget. C: City Clerk Agenda G-8 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief DATE: December 2, 2004 SUBJECT: Budget Request -Defibrillator Monitors Introduction In the 2004 budget, there is money set aside to purchase three (3) defibrillator monitors. Early this summer, we evaluated the Philips MRX, the Medtronic Life Pack 12 and the Zoll. Meetings were held with the paramedics to discuss the pros and cons of each unit and it was decided that either the Philips or the Medtronic would best meet our needs. At that time, we were planning on going out for bid for three (3) of these monitor defibrillators, however, in September; one of our monitors broke and we needed to do an emergency replacement. We received written quotes from both Medtronic ($46,218) and Philips ($39,394.56). Philips was the low quote and we therefore purchased a Phillips MRX. Both the Philip quote and the Medtronic quote are good until mid-December. Purchasing these monitor from Philips will give us three (3) monitors that are exactly the same which will allow for more consistency in their use in training and will allow us to interchange accessories and replacement patches. Also, these are compatible with the 12 AED that we currently have. Recommendation I recommend that the City Council authorize the purchase of two (2) Philips MRX defibrillators in the amount of $39,394.56. C: City Clerk Agenda G-9 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Steve Lukin, Fire Chief DATE: December 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Paid-Per-Call Pay Rate Change for 2004 Introduction The paid-per-call firefighters have been receiving $14.01 since January 1 of this year. However, inadvertently, the paperwork requesting the increase was not done. Therefore, I am asking for approval fora $14.01 per call pay rate for the paid-per-call firefighters retroactive to January 1, 2004. I apologize for the inconvenience. C: City Clerk AGENDA ITEM G-10 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Chuck Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Chuck Vermeersch, Civil Engineer 1 SUBJECT: Hazelwood/County Road C Area Street Improvements, City Project 03-18: Resolution for Modification of the Existing Construction Contract, Change Order 3 DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction/Summary During construction there are often unforeseen changes from the original plans and specifications. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution directing the modification of the existing construction contract and revising the project financing plan to reflect the receipt of payments for private driveway work. Background The changes described in Change Order 3 total $95,321.09. Of this amount, $61,157.92 is for contract items in excess of plan quantities. These items are summarized in the table below. Excess Quantities of Contract Items 1. REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 1069 $1.55 $1,657.42 2. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 1,251 $5.65 $7,068.15 3. STREET SWEEPER WITH PICKUP BROOM HR 44 $85.00 $3,740.00 4. TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR SY 1 162 $7.50 $8 712.75 DRIVEWAYS IN ROW , , 5. F & I - 8"x4" PVC WYE, 2-8" FERNCOS, SHEAR EA 4 $2 100.00 $8 400.00 RINGS. CUT WYE INTO EX. MAIN , , 6. WATER UTILITY HOLE (EXCAVATE & BACKFILL) EA 17 $502.25 $8,357.44 7. 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, SY 707 $32.86 $23 222.16 RESIDENTIAL , SUBTOTAL $61,157.92 Items 1, 4 and 7 are for portions of driveways requiring replacement in order to match into the newly reconstructed road. The contract quantity is normally estimated as the portion of the driveway within the right of way; however, during construction it sometimes becomes necessary to remove and replace additional driveway in order to provide a smooth transition. Item 2 is for subgrade excavation. This is necessary where poor soil conditions exist. The contract quantity was estimated using soil borings and test pits. Areas requiring this type of correction are ultimately determined during construction and exceeded the estimated quantity. Hazelwood Street Project 03-18 Agenda Report Page 2 December 7, 2004 Item 3 relates to erosion control and project housekeeping. The quantity was estimated based on past projects. The quantity was exceeded due to need and requests from residents for additional sweeping. Item 5 reflects the repair of 4 broken sanitary sewer wyes connected with sanitary sewer service repairs. Although the televising which is done prior to construction usually gives a good idea of the number of repairs that need to be made, many times a broken wye will not show until the service has been uncovered. These types of repairs are paid for out of the sanitary sewer fund. Item 6 resulted from an unforeseen water main conflict with the new storm sewer. It was necessary to offset the existing water main to provide clearance for the new storm sewer. The balance of $34,163.17 is for private driveway work done under the city's driveway replacement program. Payments totaling $53,131.79 have been received from residents who chose to have private driveway work done under this project, and these payments have been credited to the project fund. The items associated with the private driveway work are summarized in the table below. Private Driveway Quantities 1. REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 916 $2.00 $1 831.00 (PRIVATE) , 2. REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 368 $2.00 $736.60 AND/OR WALK PRIVATE 3. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION, CY (EV) FOR CY 144 $10.30 $1 482.17 PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS, BIT. OR CONC. , 4. AGGREGATE BASE CL. 6 FOR PRIVATE TN 696 $15.00 $10 434.60 DRIVEWAYS & WALKS , 5. TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR SY 1 161 $9.00 $10 449.00 DRIVEWAYS (PRIVATE) , , 6. 4" CONCRETE WALK (PRIVATE) SF 196 $5.00 $980.00 7. 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, SY 217 $38.00 $8 249.80 RESIDENTIAL (PRIVATE) , SUBTOTAL FOR PRIVATE DRIVEWAY WORK $34,163.17 Budget Impact On August 9, 2004, the council passed a revised project-financing plan based on the bid prices and projected construction costs that reduced the project budget from $2,898,200 to 2,234,017. The details of that revision are as follows: Street assessments: $ 740,664 (33 %) Storm assessments: $44,475 (2%) Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund: $174,000 (8 %) Environmental Utility Fund: $225,000 (10%) SPRWS Obligation: $30,924 (1 %) City debt service: $ 1,018,954 4f 6%) Total $2,234,017 (100%) Hazelwood Street Project 03-18 Agenda Report Page 3 December 7, 2004 A revision to the revised budget is proposed at this time to reflect the receipt of the payments for the private driveway work. The newly revised project financing plan would be as follows: Street assessments: $ 740,664 (32 %) Storm assessments: $44,475 (2%) Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund: $174,000 (8 %) Environmental Utility Fund: $225,000 (10%) SPRWS Obligation: $30,924 (1 %) Private Driveway Payments: $53,132 (2%) City debt service: $ 1,018,954 4f 5%) Total $2,287,148 (100%) Approval of this resolution would increase the construction contract by $95,321.32 to $1,681,913.32 and increase the budget from $2,234,017 to $2,287,148. As stated above, the budget increase results from money taken in from the private driveway replacement program. The increase in the construction contract falls within the newly revised project budget, and is 4.5% less than the original engineer's estimate of $1,760,886.50 for the project. As such, no adverse budget impacts are anticipated. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution Directing the Modification of the Existing Construction Contract for the Hazelwood/County Road C Area Street Improvements, City Project 03-18, and revising the project financing plan to reflect payments received for private driveway work. CJV Attachments: Resolution Change Order No. 3 Location Map RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 03-18, CHANGE ORDER 3, AND REVISION OF THE PROJECT FINANCING PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 03-18, Hazelwood/County Road C Area Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 03-18, Change Order No. 3, and WHEREAS, payments were received from residents for private driveway work under the city's private driveway replacement program, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that: The mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 3 in the amount of $95,321.32. The revised contract amount is $1,681,913.32. 2. The finance director is hereby directed to revise the financing plan for the Hazelwood/County Road C Street Improvements project as follows: Street assessments: $ 740,664 (32 %) Storm assessments: $44,475 (2%) Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund: $174,000 (8 %) Environmental Utility Fund: $225,000 (10%) SPRWS Obligation: $30,924 (1 %) Private Driveway Payments $53,132 (2%) City debt service: $ 1,018,954 45% Total $2,287,148 (100%) klF � M N 711 -r -I 71 T, i M El -N -11,11Z FIM -1�0 MMIN, SMERIUM I , "-IM -� w NJ ml, K -mm -M �.� UAUZE& ET U?3 �4912 Wt no Pi KNOW i Va op AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM G-11 TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Kennard Street Improvements (Beam to County Road D), Project 03-04 Resolution for Modification of Exist. Construction Contract, Change Order No. 5 DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction A contract for the roadway construction of Kennard Street between Beam Avenue and County Road D was awarded on September 8, 2003. During construction there was an unforeseen revocation of a temporary easement that altered the condition of the contract. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution directing the modification of the existing construction contract for the roadway construction, Change Order No. 5. Background Change Order No. 5 is for $19,859.05 and is related to temporary revocation this spring of a temporary easement by the property owner of Birch Run. The final grading, sod and restoration work along Birch Run could not be completed until later this summer after the property owner's concerns had been resolved. Most of the costs reflected in the change order were planned and would have been realized during the initial construction. However, because the contractor had to remobilize, they were understandably not willing to do the work at the original unit bid prices. Revised prices were reviewed and agreed upon by the engineer. See the attached memos from SEH. Budget Impact No increase in the project budget is required as these extras still fall within the contingency of the original approved budget. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for Change Order No. 5 in the amount of $19,859.05 for the road construction contract of Kennard Street, Project 03-04. CMC Attachments: Resolution Memo from Steve Heth, SEH, (re: Change Order No. 5) Change Order No. 5, (2 pgs) RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 03-04, Kennard Street Improvements, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 03-04, Change Order No. 5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order No. 4 in the amount of $19,859.05. The revised contract amount is $1,293,548.09. No revisions to the project budget are proposed at this time as these changes fall within the original project budget. M a� pa l^���'F•,'c arm-mlY 'Ole 9; 117 a .WR, ZOOM= .77A-. My',�. 7 73� w.xi&r��- a- - -` X,s ,`.fit$&e"�3�{0."�`.�it 4 j[ 1c�:fS Tis if ,e.yits�z:.�m'x&3 ?-pti -II r- .. -. IM 2 s anq'b f E 15 a.{givlry S a .WR, ZOOM= .77A-. My',�. 7 73� w.xi&r��- a- - -` X,s ,`.fit$&e"�3�{0."�`.�it 4 j[ 1c�:fS Tis if ,e.yits�z:.�m'x&3 ?-pti -II r- .. -. Pal Wha klAn MMO S -- -77— M, I M M Offlmw WIll, V1117FI, Wha klAn 43- Z S -- -77— M, I M M qZ7' =M WIll, V1117FI, ISM- ji � MOM TS u� x�v�s.�e u -3x oa�. , Yll IGSeiy-215^-' j vimn---'tix+a.Yicw?- 1L'h1 <:.L id/P.><R-A-� •-ux'�v_ yr . ........... . an. AGENDA ITEM G-12 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution for Adoption of 2005 Public Works Permit Fees DATE: December 6, 2004 Introduction/Summary The public works department has proposed revisions to the permit fees that are collected by the public works department. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution for adoption of the 2005 public works permit fees. Background In February of 2004, after a comprehensive review of the public works permits by staff, the city council approved some significant adjustments to the permit fees collected for permits issued by the Public Works Department. Those permits include: grading, sewer services, private sanitary and storm sewer mains, open cut and driveways. Prior to 2004 those fees had not been revised for many years to account for inflation. Permit fees were closely reviewed and evaluated in 2003 to compare the fees collected to the amount of staff time involved with such a permit. During the 2003 review of permits, it was determined that a number of the public works fees had been underestimated and therefore were adjusted to more reflect service provided. With the approval of the adjusted fees in February 2004, it was proposed that fees would be reviewed annually and any recommendations for adjustment be brought to the city council for consideration. The present proposal for fee adjustments would be effective on January 1St of 2005. With the exception of the driveway permit fee and the Water Availability Charge (WAC), all other fees are proposed to be raised by an inflationary factor of 3.00%, which was determined from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota Inflation Calculator for the period from 2003 to 2004. The driveway permit fee is proposed to be increased from $15 to $20, as the fee is still artificially low. In addition, the WAC (Water Availability Charge) has been added to this schedule. The WAC fee of $150 has been a long standing amount for many years and is proposed to be raised from $150 to $200. Discussion Attached is a table of current (2004) and proposed (2005) Public Works permit fees as they apply. It is recommended that these fees take effect for any applications received after January 1, 2005. In addition, it is recommended that these fees continue to be reviewed annually with a recommendation brought before the city council for consideration. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached Resolution for Adoption of the 2005 Public Works Permit Fees. CMC Attachments: Resolution Public Works 2005 Permit Fee Schedule RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE 2005 PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT FEES WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has established permit fees for sewer service construction, storm sewer and sanitary sewer main construction, driveway construction, water connection and grading, and WHEREAS, city staff has reviewed the permit fees and prepared a schedule of fees titled 2005 Public Works Permit Fees, dated December 6, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that 1. The updated public works fees are approved for all related permit applications received after January 1, 2005. 2. The rates shown will be reviewed by staff on an annual basis with recommendations for revision brought to the city council for consideration. Public Works Permit Fees Date of Revision: 12/6/04, cmc 2004 2005 Sewer Service Connection Permit Residential: $79.00 $82.00 Multi-Family/Commercial/Industrial: $92.00 $95.00 Repair: $30.00 $31.00 Private Storm Sewer and Utility Main Permit Storm: Private Storm Sewer Main Base Fee: $90.00 $93.00 Connections to existing system, (public): $50.00 $52.00 Connections to existing system, (private): $20.00 $21.00 New Storm Structures, (public): $50.00 $52.00 New Storm Structures, (private): $10.00 $11.00 Open Cut of Public Street: $50.00 $52.00 Sanitary: Private Sanitary Sewer Main Base Fee: $90.00 $93.00 Connections to existing system, (public): $50.00 $52.00 Connections to existing system, (private): $40.00 $42.00 New Sanitary Structures, (public): $50.00 $52.00 New Sanitary Structures, (private): $40.00 $42.00 Open Cut of Public Street: $50.00 $52.00 Driveway Construction Permit Permit: $15.00 $20.00 Grading Permit, (based on 1997 UBC): Plan Review Fee: <= 50 C.Y. No Fee No Fee 51 to 100 C.Y. $27.50 $29.00 101 to 1000 C.Y. $43.25 $45.00 1001 to 10,000 C.Y. $57.75 $60.00 10,0001 to 100,000 C.Y.: First 10,000 C.Y. $57.75 $60.00 plus each additional 10,000 C.Y. $27.75 $29.00 100,001 to 200,000 C.Y.: First 100,000 C.Y. $316.50 $326.00 plus each additional 10,000 C.Y. $15.50 $16.00 200,000 C.Y. or More: First 200,000 C.Y. $471.50 $486.00 plus each additional 10,000 C.Y. $8.50 $9.00 Grading Permit Fee: <= 50 C.Y. $27.50 $29.00 51 to 100 C.Y. $43.25 $45.00 101 to 1000 C.Y. First 100 C.Y. $43.25 $45.00 plus each additional 100 C.Y. $20.50 $22.00 1001 to 10,000 C.Y. First 1000 C.Y. $227.75 $235.00 plus each additional 1000 C.Y. $17.00 $18.00 10,001 to 100,000 C.Y.: First 10,000 C.Y. $380.50 $392.00 plus each additional 10,000 C.Y. $77.50 $80.00 100,001 C.Y. or More: First 100,000 C.Y. $1,078.00 $1,111.00 plus each additional 10,000 C.Y. $42.75 $45.00 Water Availability Charge WAC $150.00 $200.00 12/7/2004 p/works/eng/lib/ Permit Fees AGENDA ITEM G-13 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: County Road D Realignment East (TH 61 to Southlawn), City File 02-07 - Approve Right of Way Exchange Agreement with Lexus of Maplewood DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction On June 28, 2004, the city council awarded the construction contract for the realignment of County Road D on the east side of Trunk Highway 61 to Southlawn Drive. Final approval of the acquisition agreements is required to proceed with the construction. It is recommended that the city council approve an agreement with Lexus of Maplewood for property acquisition for this project. Background On December 9, 2002, the city council approved a resolution to proceed with a project to realign County Road D from Hazelwood Street to TH 61. That resolution was the culmination of many hours of discussion and debate with staff, agencies, other communities and property owners that occurred over many years. On May 12, 2003, the city council selected a final alignment for the new roadway and authorized preparation of a preliminary report on the improvement. Following a public hearing on September 8, 2003, the city council approved the realignment of County Road D between TH 61 and Southlawn Drive. The city council approved the first phase of construction with the award of bid on November 10, 2003, for soil correction and wetland creation. On June 28, 2004, the city council awarded the final contract for the roadway improvements for the roadway realignment project. In order to safely accommodate the expected increases in traffic volumes on the new County Road D, the roadway has been designed with center medians and protected left turn lanes. The intersection of new County Road D will include a signal and left and turn lanes requiring extensive right of way from adjacent properties. The City has previously acquired and relocated the Venburg Tire business. A small portion of right of way is required from Lexus of Maplewood to finalize the intersection and turn lane projects. The value of the land has been appraised at $27,000. Lexus has agreed to accept that amount along with a driveway improvement. Approval of the attached Exchange Agreement and Temporary Construction Easement is recommended. Budget Impact The $27,000 expense is within the amount budgeted for this easement, although total easement costs for this project have exceeded estimates, as property in this project area has increased rapidly in value beyond expectations this past year. The bids for this project were very favorable and resulted in a $1,000,000 savings. At this time, it appears that adequate funds still remain to keep this project fund on budget. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the acquisition agreement with Lexus of Maplewood for the County Road D Realignment Project (TH 61 to Southlawn Drive) and a total payment of $27,000 to Bloomer Properties. RCA Attachments: Exchange Agreement and Temporary Construction Easement Location Map EXCHANGE AGREEMENT This Agreement, dated December , 2004, is between the City of Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and Bloomer Properties, LLC, a limited liability company in the State of Minnesota ("Bloomer Properties"). WHEREAS, the City is undertaking a prof ect known as the County Road D Realignment, Project Number 02-07; WHEREAS, Bloomer Properties owns property in the Project Area, legally described as: Tract G, Registered Land Survey No. 525, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. "Lexus Property;" WHEREAS, Bloomer Properties leases the Lexus Property to an operator which operates its Lexus of Maplewood business on the Lexus Property; WHEREAS, the City is in need of a portion of the Lexus Property for the new County Road D right-of--way, legally described as follows: All that part of Tract G, Registered Land Survey No. 525, Ramsey County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of the following described line and its extensions: commencing at the Southwest corner of said Tract G; thence on an assumed bearing of North 12 degrees 24 minutes 23 seconds East along the westerly line of said Tract G, for 42.76 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 77 degrees 33 minutes 51 seconds East for 105.61 feet; thence South 82 degrees OS minutes 37 seconds East for 52.48 feet to the boundary between said Tract G and Tract F of said Registered Land Survey No. 525 and said line there terminating. "Right-of--Way Property;" WHEREAS, the City is in need of a temporary construction easement over a portion of the Lexus Property for the County Road D Realignment, Project Number 02-07, legally described as follows: The southerly 100 feet of said Tract G and the northerly feet of said Tract G. Said temporary construction easement shall commence on March 1, 2005 and expire on December 31, 2005. "Temporary Construction Easement Property;" WHEREAS, in exchange for grant of fee title to the above-describedRight-of--Way Property and for a temporary easement over the above-described Temporary Construction Easement Property by Bloomer Properties, the City of Maplewood shall: Pay Bloomer Properties the total sum of $27,000 for the fee title for the Right-of Way Property and for the temporary easement over the Temporary Construction Easement Property. 2. Grant Bloomer Properties a new right-in/right-out access to County Road D for Lexus of Maplewood on the Lexus Property at no cost to Bloomer Properties. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the City's payment of $27,000 and the grant and construction of a new right-in/right-out access to County Road D for the Lexus Property at no cost to Bloomer Properties: Bloomer Properties agrees to convey fee title to the Right-of--Way Property to the City free of all encumbrances _ . The total area of the Right-of--Way Property is 4,051 square feet, as illustrated in attached Exhibit 7._Bloomer Properties has paid all real estate taxes on the Right-of Way Property payable in 2004 and shall not be entitled to any proration of such paid real estate taxes if this transaction closes in calendar year 2004. Bloomer Properties and the City agree to prorate real estate taxes payable in the year of the closing as of the date of closing if this transaction closes on or after January 1, 2005. `~ The City agrees to accept the Right of Way Property in its "as is, where is" condition. 2. Bloomer Properties agrees to covey a temporary construction easement over the Temporary Construction Easement Property. The temporary easement shall commence on March 1, 2005 and terminate on December 31, 2005. The City agrees to accept the temporary construction easement over the Temporary Construction Easement Property in its "as is, where is" condition. Bloomer Properties represents and warrants to the City that: A. Bloomer Properties has all requisite power and authority to execute this Agreement and the documents previously listed hereof, and the officers of Bloomer Properties who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of Bloomer Properties have the power and the authority to do so and to bind Bloomer Properties. B. To the best of the knowledge of Bloomer Properties, the conveyance of the Right-of--Way Property pursuant hereto will not violate any applicable statute, ordinance, governmental restriction or regulation, or any private restriction or agreement applicable to the Right-of--Way Property, or to Bloomer Properties. C. Bloomer Properties has not used the Right-of--Way Property and, to the best of Bloomer Properties' knowledge, the Right-of--Way Property has never been used for the production, storage, deposit or disposal of toxic, dangerous or hazardous substances, pollutants, wastes or contaminants, including but not limited to nuclear fuel or wastes or wastes that are considered hazardous by law and regulations, and to the best of Bloomer Properties' knowledge and belief, no such substances, pollutants, wastes or contaminants exist on the Right-of--Way Property. To the best of Bloomer Properties' knowledge and belief, there are no underground storage tanks on or under the Right-of- Way Property. D. Bloomer Properties will act reasonably and exercise due diligence in the performance of the acts permitted or required under this Agreement. E. Bloomer Properties has good and marketable title in fee simple to the Right-of--Way Property free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever, except for such matters, if any, to which the City, at its option, may consent to in writing, F. To the best of the knowledge of Bloomer Properties, there exists no judgment, lien, suit, action or legal, administrative, arbitration or other proceeding, or any change in the zoning or building ordinances affecting the Right-of--Way Property pending or, to the best of Bloomer Properties' knowledge and belief, threatened against Bloomer Properties which could result in a judgment or lien against Bloomer Properties or could result in a re-zoning or taking of the Right-of--Way Property; there exists no other basis for any assertion against Bloomer Properties which would interfere with or prevent the transactions contemplated hereby. G. Bloomer Properties represents that no other parties have an interest in the Right-of--Way Property either by claim of damage or by reason of any Rental of leasing rights. H. Bloomer Properties hereby agrees that the truthfulness of each of the foregoing representations and warranties and of all other representations and warranties herein made is a condition precedent to the performance by the City of its obligations hereunder. The representations contained herein shall survive closing hereunder for a period of one (1) year. Upon the material breach of any representation or warranty, the City may declare this Agreement to be null and void. L In the event wells are located ontheRight-of--Way Property, the responsibility for sealing and capping said wells including all costs is the responsibility of Bloomer Properties. Bloomer Properties will pay to the City $26,880.00 in assessments for roadway improvements for the Lexus Property. Bloomer Properties has been advised of its right to notice and a public hearing and right to appeal concerning the assessments proposed against the Lexus Property with the amount to be $26,880.00. The assessments are to be paid over a fifteen (15) year period at an interest rate of 5%. Bloomer Properties expressly agrees to waive the notice of hearing, hearing and its right to appeal said assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.061, et al. Minnesota case law supports waiver of assessment procedures such as the right of notice and public hearing. In Re Nemzek, 58 N.W.2d 746 (Minn. 1953). I~. floc ~ - - •- - 'n ' ~l Release ~ L ~ Li th~ _~ _ _ t 'Cr rse_ 'City. 4. The City's obligation under this Agreement shall be conditioned, for the sole benefit of the City, upon the following: A.Contingent on the City's engineering studies finding that the Right-of--Way Property is suitable for the City's intended use. B.Contingent upon review and approval of final terms by the City Council. The transaction contemplated by this Agreement shall close no later than ". If the closing has not occurred on or before ~, this Agreement shall be null and void and neither party shall have any further liability under this Agreement, except for any breach by either party in the fulfillment of its 6. For a period of three (3) years after the opening for traffic of the realigned County Road D that is to be located on a portion of the Right-of--Way Property, if Bloomer Properties determines that such traffic causes damage to any vehicles located within the parking areas adjacent to the northerly boundary of the Right-of--Way Property, Bloomer Properties notify the City of damage, together with evidence reasonably substantiating such damage IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. BLOOMER PROPERTIES, LLC CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By: Its: By: Date Its: Mayor By:_ Its: City Manager Date Date n t hr W, TY F 7 �10 Mi. - 4w� -A4.... -L2Z I t1t. r'e E7-7� Agenda G-14 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: November 17, 2004 for the December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting SUBJECT: Change Order for Legacy Village Park Introduction The Maplewood City Council formally awarded the low bid to Odesa Constnaction for the hardscape of Legacy Village sculpture parkin June 2004. The project has proceeded well and will be completed by December 1, 2004. Background The total amount of Change Order #1 is $6,200. There are two items responsible for the change order. The first was actually a misunderstanding in the initial bid awarding regarding a deduct for the pathway lighting direct bury. The city initially took this deduct item, but it was only a deduct if the pathway lighting was accepted as part of the contract. The pathway lighting was not accepted and consequently, the deduct should not have been considered initially. Rs a side note to the pathway lighting, staff still envisions bringing this issue before the council once a funding source is determined. We worked with the contractor to install conduit under the trail so that we would not have to "cut" the blacktop to install the wire in the future. The second add amounted to $1,200 for additional colors for the maple leaf emblems that will be installed on the wrought iron fence. This was a decision made by me, which I believe enhances the maple leaves to provide more of a fall or natural look with the additional colors. The total contract sum is $326,989.75. The project will remain on schedule and under budget. Recommendation Staff recommends that Change Order #1 as outlined in the amount of $6,200 be accepted and that the finance director make the necessary budget modifications. khUegacy park change order.park-openspace.mem Attachment Charge Order #1 Contract Change Order for: Legacy Village Park City of Maplewood, MN To (Contractorl: Odesa Construction, Inc. PO Box 205 Gilman, MN 56333 Distribution To: ^ Owner ^ Field ^ Consultant ^ Other ^ Contractor Initiation Date: 29-Sep-04 Consultants Project: #04-18 City Proiect: #2004-02 CHANGES TO THE CONTRACT (The contractor shall make the following chances to the contractl # DESCRIPTION ADD DEDUCT 1 Additional color option for fencing -including fencing modifications to allow for removable ma le leaf emblems. 1,200.00 2 ompensa ion or e u a erna e i i em pa way ig ing direct bury). Note: This deduct bid item could have only been accepted if the pathway lighting was accepted as part of the contract. 5,000.00 - TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADDS AND DEDUCTS: 6,200.00 - NETCHANGE ORDER TOTAL: $6,20 0.00 Contract Summary to Date Original Contract Sum: 320,789.75 Net Change b Previous) Authorized Chan e Orders: - Net Change of this Change Order: 6,200.00 Total Contract Sum Including all Change Orders to Date): $326,989.75 Consultant: Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 10417 Excelsior Blvd., Suite #1 Hopkins, MN 55343 Contractor: Odesa Construction, Inc. PO Box 205 Gilman, MN 56333 Owner: City of Maplewood -Parks & Rec. 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 /~ ~~ /~'r~y Signatures Date ~L4, ~h-s'nc2.rt L ~ F0. ignature ~~ ~ ~~ Signaf re ~~~ ~3--(,~~ Date // / ~~° Date Brauer Associates, Ltd. H:\templateslBrauer Bidding & Observlchange order.xlt Page 1 of 1 Agenda G-15 MEM TO: Richard Fursman, City na er ~ FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Di ect o n Recreati n DATE: December 6, 2004 for a er 13, 2004 City Council Meeting SUBJECT: Legacy Village Sculpture Park/Acquisition of Public Sculpture and Ice Fountain Entitled "Northern Lights" Introduction Legacy Village sculpture park is an 11-acre site located southwest of Legacy Parkway and Southlawn Avenue. The 11-acre site is being completed in two phases with the hardscape phase approximately 95% complete and the landscaping to be installed in the spring of 2005. The sculpture park has generated a great deal of excitement within the community. The parks and recreation commission has hosted a series of public meetings to develop a policy for acquisition of permanent works of art. The site has the potential to host 24 to 30 sculptures depending on the size, with'/~ being 8 to 10 permanent pieces and the others rotated on a regular basis. Background The Maplewood city council awarded bids for phase one construction of Legacy Village sculpture park in May 2004. The past five months have brought about the completion of the hardscape including the constnaction of the pergola, benches, rough grading, bridges, a floating boardwalk, ornamental lighting and fences. The project has received a good deal of public comment for the city and an overall, positive reaction. Mayor Robert Cardinal received a letter from the Nicollet Mall advisory board on October 18 indicating that they would be decommissioning an ice fountain sculpture entitled "Northern Lights" by Carl Nesjar. Carl Nesjar is an internationally known Norwegian artist who is acclaimed as a painter, designer, photographer and sculptor. He did collaborative work with Pablo Picasso from 1957 to 1975 and was commissioned to construct a public sculpture for the Nicollet Mall in 1991. The work is composed of four geometric sculptural units consisting of curving rows of upright stainless steel square tubing. The sculpture is designed to have both fountain jets and misters near the top of the vertical forms. The sculpture currently does not work on the Nicollet Mall and is being made available to communities at no cost with the exception of relocation and installation. At this time I do not have an estimate on the transportation/relocation cost, but would estimate it to be $5,000 to $10,000. Staff has been in continuous contact with the Nicollet Mall advisory board and is excited about the potential of the sculpture being Located at the new Legacy Village sculpture garden. One could argue that this could serve as not only the center piece of the Legacy Village sculpture garden, but also provide tremendous publicity and promotion for our new public sculpture garden. An application is currently being completed by staff, which is due January 15, 2005. One of the components is support from the city council should we be selected to receive this piece. Attached is a copy of a resolution authorizing staff to pursue the acquisition of the sculpture piece with the understanding that funds would need to be allocated from the parks and recreation department budget once they are known in 2005. Recommendation Staff recommends that the city council adopt the enclosed resolution supporting staff's application process for possible acquisition of the public sculpture and ice fountain entitled "Northern Lights" by Carl Nesjar. khlsculpture-northern IigMs.legacy viliage.parks.mem Enclosure RESOLUTION RESOLUTION ENDORSING AND SUPPORTING THE ACQUISITION OF THE NORTHERN LIGHTS SCULPTURE by Carl Nesjar for relocation to Legacy Village sculpture park, Maplewood, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood has acquired and developed an 11-acre, outdoor sculpture garden entitled Legacy Village sculpture park; and WHEREAS, the sculpture park is located as part of a major, 80-acre subdivision that includes senior housing, owner occupied and rental townhouses, commercial business and restaurant properties, and WHEREAS, Legacy Village development is located adjacent to the regional Maplewood Mall shopping center; and WHEREAS, the Legacy Village development serves not only a local, but a regional population base; and WHEREAS, the Legacy Village sculpture park is scheduled to open to the public May 1, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Legacy Village sculpture park will provide 24 to 30 sculpture pieces of which approximately'/~ will be permanent sculptures; and WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood envisions that the Legacy Village sculpture garden will host not only a local, but also a regional and potentially national and international base of sculptures and public interest; and WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood desires to acquire one major piece that would serve as the focal point for the Legacy Village sculpture park. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the city of Maplewood hereby endorses the acquisition of the Northern Lights sculpture piece by Carl Nesjar; and FURTHERMORE, that the Northern Lights sculpture piece will serve as the central focal point with viewing areas from the already completed pergola; and WHEREAS, the city of Maplewood has adequate funds to relocate the sculpture piece. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the city council hereby endorses the grant submittal for the Northern Lights sculpture piece, adopted this 13th day of December, 2004. SIGNED Date ATTEST Date Agenda G-16 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: December 6, 2004 for the December 13, 2004 City Council Meeting SUBJECT: Nature Center Donation Introduction The Maplewood Nature Center participated in the grand opening celebration of the Noodles Inc. restaurant located at White Bear and Beam Avenues. The grand opening was held the week of May 9 and the nature center received $1,500 in donations from patrons during the opening day celebration. The city council needs to formally authorize the city finance director to make the necessary budget change so that the $1,500 nature center donation from Noodles Inc. is received and properly accounted for. A letter of thanks and appreciation was sent to the Noodles Inc management in May. This is strictly a housekeeping item that requires formal city council authorization to permit the budget transfer. Recommendation Staff recommends that the city council accept the nature center donation from Noodles Inc in the amount of $1,500 and that the finance director make the necessary budget adjustment. kh\donation.nature center.mem AGENDA ITEM G-17 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Erin Laberee, Engineer 1 SUBJECT: Kennard/Frost Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 02-10: Resolutions for: 1. Directing Modification of Approved Budget 2. Acceptance of Project DATE: December 2, 2004 Introduction/Summary The Kennard/Frost neighborhood street improvement project was constructed in 2003. Final construction expenses and financing have been determined. The final project budget is over the approved budget by $7,412. The city council will consider approving the attached resolutions directing modification of the approved budget and acceptance of the project. Background The project is final and complete. The approved budget for the project is $3,102,000. The project cost is over budget by $7,412. Additional engineering and administration costs were charged to the project over the approved budget. These additional costs were due to staff time spent managing the project and resolving residential issues. With over 250 residents in the project area, extra time was necessary to help residents with their concerns regarding construction from the prior year. The final project cost is $3,109,412. This includes all construction and engineering costs associated with the project. Budget Impact The revised budget is greater than the approved budget by $7,412. The general tax levy budget has been increased from $1,499,000 to $1,506,412. All other funding sources have not changed. The following page details the approved and revised final budget for project 02-10: Funding Source Approved Budget Street Assessments: $1,110,800 Storm Assessments: $8,923 Sewer Utility Fund $161,300 SPRWS: $153,360 General Tax Levy: $1,499,000 Private Driveways $130,950 Revised Budaet $1,110,800 $8,923 $161,300 $153, 360 $1,506,412 $130,950 Total: $3,102,000 $3,109,412 Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the two attached resolutions for the Kennard/Frost Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 02-10: Directing Modification of Approved Budget and Acceptance of Project. EML Attachments: Resolutions (2) Location Map RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF PROJECT BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 02-10, Kennard/Frost Neighborhood Street Improvements, and The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the revised financing plan for the project. The revised financing plan is as shown below: Funding Source Approved Budget Revised Budget Street Assessments: $1,110,800 $1,110,800 Storm Assessments: $8,923 $8,923 Sewer Utility Fund $161,300 $161,300 SPRWS: $153,360 $153,360 General Tax Levy: $1,499,000 $1,506,412 Private Driveways $130,950 $130,950 Total: $3,102,000 $3,109,412 RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that the Kennard/Frost Neighborhood Street Improvements, City Project 02-10, are complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 02-10 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. V1 w ~ LAURIE RD. ° ~ Q SAND HURST ~ ~ ~ z_ ~ BURKE AVE ~ . _ 00 ELDR IDLE AVE. BELMON LN. ° 0 ~KILLMAN AVE. 0 J w ~ ~ ~ ~ N Q Z (n (n z z ~ ° LAURIE Q RD. c~ ~ LAS Q ~ ~ Sherwoodz ~ J Y W ~ W ~ Park z cn AVE. ~ o Q U U ~ w ~ ~ CO. RD. > B v BURKE AVE. ' S~P~ Community ~~ 64 65 Center John Glenn ~ ~FWa v city Hall Robinhood ~, Park R AN A z Q~ J~v' ,~ z ~, 1 ~ ~ ~ °II P ~ AVE. ~ u ~ ~ g 1 ER AV E. v Wakefie Q Q Park W = m ,~ ° z ~ cG Wakefield'' ~ `~~ ~ ~0~~ .Lake m I A AVE. >-" ~ ~ ~~ , ~~ ~ PRICE P~ • ~ m \ O LARPENTEUR ll~il~l~~~~7 KINGSTON 1 ~ PRICE AVE. ~ _~ 2 = 2 W Z U 0 ZO ~ ~o° ~ C ~fl ~ ~ n Project location no scale Exhibit 1 Project Location S U1~ M HARRIS AVE. ~ ROSEWOOD AVE. N AVE. S. ~ ~~P ~ ~~ 5~ ,~ 28 AVE. ~ -I ALDRICH 0 w Y >- w ARENA z Q > GOODRICH GOLF COURSEQPJ~ 5~ ~/ J 0_ RIPLEY AV MSEY COUNTY SING HOME AND AIR GROUNDS J o ~ ~ ~ Q w ~ Q z o m cn ~ z ~ g ~ Q Kennard/Frost Area Improvement 02-10 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM G-18 TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Resolution for Modification of Project Budgets and Closeout of Projects: 1. Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Project 00-04 2. Lift Station 2 Replacement, Project 00-11 3. Markham Pond Outlet Improvements, Project 02-02 DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction Staff is in the process of closing out projects before year end. Three projects require minor revisions to the budgets in order to close out the projects. The city council will consider approving the attached resolution for modification of the project budgets of these three projects. Background The construction on these projects has been completed for some time. The projects and project funds have remained open while there were additional project costs yet to be accrued to the fund after construction. In most cases, these were engineering expenses related to the preparation of final record drawings. Budget Impact Listed below are the amounts each project has overrun their approved budgets and the funding sources from which these overruns should be covered: 1. Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Protect 00-04: The budget was originally reduced at the end of the construction, however recent engineering charges exceeded estimates and the project has exceeded that revised budget by $1,215. The overrun in the project budget for Project 00-04 should be funded from the debt service fund. 2. Lift Station 2 Replacement, Project 00-11: The project budget has exceeded the approved budget by $5,041. The overrun in the project budget for Project 00-11 should be funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund. 3. Markham Pond Outlet Improvements, Project 02-02: The project budget has exceeded the approved budget by $590. The overrun in the project budget for Project 02-02 should be funded from the debt service fund. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolution for modification of the project budgets for Projects 00-04, 00-11 and 02-02 and authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary financial transfers as noted in the resolution. CMC Attachments: Resolution RESOLUTION MODIFICATION OF PROJECT BUDGETS WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that projects, 00-04, 00-11 and 02-02 are complete and recommends that the project funds be closed, and WHEREAS, the project budgets for these projects must be modified as noted due to short falls in project funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the finance director is authorized to make the necessary financial transfers as noted below: 1. Tilsen South Neighborhood Streets, Protect 00-04: The project budget shall be increased by $1,215. This overrun shall be funded from the debt service fund. 2. Lift Station 2 Replacement, Protect 00-11: The project budget shall be increased by $5,041. This overrun shall be funded from the Sanitary Sewer Fund. 3. Markham Pond Outlet Improvements, Project 02-02: The project budget shall be increased by $590. This overrun shall be funded from the debt service fund. AGENDA NO. G-19 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director RE: INCREASE IN BUILDING, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL FEES DATE: December 8, 2004 On November 22 the City Council approved an increase in building, mechanical, plumbing and electrical permit fees effective 1-1-05. Attached is a copy of the agenda report from that meeting. A revision of the ordinance that lists the fees is required and is attached as Exhibit B. It is recommended that first reading of the ordinance be approved. p\agn\BLDGFEES1 1 AGENDA NO. K-5 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director RE: Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical Permit Fees DATE: November 16, 2004 On May 24 the City Council approved a user fee study to determine if the fees charged for building, mechanical, plumbing and electrical permits cover the costs for inspections. The study has been completed and indicates that for 2003 the inspection costs exceeded permit revenues by $101,226. The following is a breakdown by type of inspection: Recoverable Units of Current Current Full Cost Total Surplus Fee Area Service Fee Revenue Per Unit Cost (Deficit) Building Inspections 1,330 $396.48 $527,321 $413.71 $550,235 ($22,914) Mechanicallnspections 730 $119.53 $87,256 $172.30 $125,779 ($38,523) Plumbing Inspections 326 $146.94 $47,904 $246.57 $80,382 ($32,478) Electricallnspections 906 $60.27 $54,606 $68.34 $61,917 ($7,311) Grand Total $717,087 $818,313 ($101,226) It is recommended that the City Council approve increases in the building, mechanical, plumbing and electrical permit fees effective 1-1-05 to cover the full cost of inspections. Attached is a detailed listing of the new permit fees. P\agn\building permit fees 2005 2 TO: Dan Faust, Finance Director FROM: David Fisher, Building Official SUBJECT: Permit Fees and increases DATE:November 10, 2004 Building Permit Fee: Permit fee to be based on j ob cost valuation. The determination of value or valuation shall be made by the building official. The value to be used in computing the building permit and building plan review fees shall be the total of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. TOTAL VALUATION FEE $1.00 to $500.00 $25.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $25.00 for the first $500.00 plus $3.25 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $73.75 for the first $2,000.00 plus $14.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $413.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $681.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.50 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1056.75 for the first $100,000.00 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,456.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $5,956.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal busin ess hours .............................. $75.00 per hour (minimum charge -two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under pr ovisions of the MN State Building Code .......................... ...................................$50.00 per hour 3. Inspections for which no fee is spec ifically indicated ......................$50.00 per hour (minimum charge -one-half hour) 4. For use of outside consultants for plan checking, inspections and similar costs iActual costs include administrative and overhead costs. Demolition Permit Fee: • Tenant improvement/remodeling prior to building permit • Structures not connected to utilities • Structures connected to city utilities ......Actual costsi $100.00 $65.00 $150.00 3 Electrical Permit Fee: • Set through contract with Contract Electrical Inspector 80% of the permit as it has been Add $9.25 Admin Fee to all electrical permits. Conditional Certificate of Occupancy Inspection Fee: • Residential $50.00 • Commercial $100.00 • Temporary /Seasonal C of O $50.00 Investigation Fee: Work without a Permit • Whenever any work for which a permit is required from the city has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Manufactured Home Permit Fee: • New installation or replacement $150.00 Moving Permit Fee: • Moving Over private property only $56.00 • Investigation fee $50.00/hour Plumbing Permit Fee: • Residential -Minimum fee $43.00 • Residential $43.00 Plus, $9.00 for each fixture opening • Commercial work 2.15 % of estimated job cost plus $86.00 Plan Review Fee: • When a building permit is required and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid. Plan review fees for all buildings shall be sixty five percent (65%) of the building permit fee, except as modified in M.S.B.C. Section 1300. • The plan review fees specified are separate fees from the permit fees specified and are in addition to the permit fees. When submittal documents are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review or when the project involves deferred submittal items an additional plan review fee shall be charged at the above rate. Expiration of plan review. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days on request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No application shall be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. 4 Refund Fee: • The building official may authorize refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan review is done. The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. Swimming Pool Permit Fee: • Above Ground • Below Ground Permit Fee (Fences, Decks, Roofs, Siding, Draintile System): • Fence over 6 feet in height • Deck • Residential roofs • Residential siding • Utility structures (over 120s.f. but not greater than 200s.f.) • Drain the • Minimum fee Miscellaneous Fees: • Replacement inspection record card • Re-stamping j ob site plan sets $100.00 $150.00 $75.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $75.00 $75.00 $25.00 $25.00 5 Mechanical Permit Fee: • Residential - Minimum fee $37.00 - Gas piping -Repair or new installation $15.00 - Gas or oil fired furnace or boiler $30.00 - Warm air furnace or hot water heating system $37.00 - Construction or alt. of any warm air furnace per unit $37.00 - Construction or alteration of each hot water system $37.00 - Installation or replacement of each hot water system per unit $37.00 - Per unit heaters based on first 100,000 BTU input $22.00 - Air conditioning -new or replacement $30.00 - Wood burning furnace per unit $37.00 - Swimming pool heater per unit $37.00 - Air exchanger $30.00 - Gas or oil space heater per unit $30.00 - Gas direct vent heater per unit $30.00 - Gas fireplace, Gas log or insert $30.00 • Commercial - All commercial work Proposed 1.85 % of estimated job cost Plus $74.00 - Mechanical plan review 25% of the permit fee 6 Work Sheet Building permit fees are increased by about 6% using the fee study from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the League of Cities. These are fees other cities are using. Demo fees are flat fees. I changed fees based on service provided. • Tenant improvement/remodeling prior to building permit (2004) $63.00 Proposed (2005) $100.00 This fee is not in system we use the $ 63.00 demo fee. • Structures not connected to utilities (2004) $63.00 Proposed (2005) $65.00 This fee is in the system and I would like to break it down on number of inspections required. • Structures connected to city utilities (2004) $63.00 Proposed (2005) $150.00 This fee is in the system and I would like to break it down on number of inspections required by all departments that review the work. Electrical Permit Fee: • Set through contract with Contract Electrical Inspector at 80% of the permit. This has been 80% of the permit for more than 10 years. Based on 2003 fees, plus 13.39% from the fee study and 2% for the CIP = 15.39% 906 electrical permits divided by the total revenue = $60.27 average per permit. $60.27 x 15.39%= $9.28 this is where the increase came from. Add $9.25 Admin Fee to all electrical permits. Investigation Fee: Work without a Permit This has always been a double fee in the past. The language needed to be added to the City Ordinance. Conditional Certificate of Occupancy Inspection Fee: • Residential $50.00 • Commercial $100.00 • Temporary /Seasonal C of O $50.00 These are new fees for services contractors are requesting. Manufactured Home Permit Fee: • New installation flat fee (2004)$41.00 Propose$150.00 This is a change. The code has changed for more structural details and requirements There are less than 25 permits per year. This would bring our fee closer to the surrounding Cities' fees. Moving Permit Fee: • Moving (2004)$53.00 Propose $56.00 • Investigation fee (2004)$47.00/hour Propose $50.00/hour Plumbing Permit Fee: • Residential -Minimum fee (2004)$25.00 Propose $43.00 • Commercial -Minimum fee (2004)$75.00 Propose $129.00 • (2004) Residential $25.00 P1us,5.00 for each fixture opening • Proposed Residential $43.00 P1us,9.00 for each fixture opening • (2004) Commercial work 1.25 % of estimated job cost plus $50.00 • Proposed Commercial work 2.15 % of estimated j ob cost plus $86.00 This brings up fee based on city fee study. 7 Work Sheet Continued Plan Review Fee: The 65% of the permit fee is in the ordinance now. RPfnnrl FPP• Needed language added to city ordinance it was removed with the code change of the 2000 IBC. It was based on old language of 1997 UBC. Swimming Pool Permit Fee: • Utilize building permit fee schedule •Above Ground (2004) $50.00 Proposed $100.00 • In-Ground (2004) $100.00 Proposed $150.00 This closer to accurate cost for hours spent for inspection and review. Also other cities have the similar fees. Permit Fee (Fences, Decks, Roofs, Siding, Draintile Svsteml: •Deck (2004)$50.00 Proposed $100.00 •Residential roofs (2004)$50.00 Proposed $100.00 • Utility structures (over 120s.f. but not greater than 200s.f.)(2004)$50.00 Proposed $100.00 •Residential siding (2004)$51.00 Proposed $100.00 The $50.00 flat fee has been in place for about ten year and has not changed. The siding permit is new within the last three years. • Fence over 6 feet in height Proposed $75.00 • Drain the Proposed $75.00 Fences and drain are based on value now. This is good change. • Minimum fee Proposed $75.00 There is nothing on file for a minimum fee. Miscellaneous Fees: • Replacement inspection record card Proposed $25.00 • Re-stamping j ob site plan sets Proposed $25.00 In the past the city charged for these items. But there is nothing on record at this time. 8 Work Sheet Continued Mechanical Permit Fee: • Residential Minimum fee Gas piping -Repair or new installation Gas or oil fired furnace or boiler Warm air furnace or hot water heating system Construction or alt. of any warm air furnace per unit Construction or alteration of each hot water system Installation or replacement of each hot water system (2003) $25.00 (2003) $10.00 (2003) $20.00 (2003) $25.00 (2003) $25.00 (2003) $25.00 per unit (2003) $25.00 Per unit heaters based on first 100,000 BTU input (2003) $15.00 - Air conditioning -new or replacement (2003) $20.00 - Wood burning furnace per unit (2003) $25.00 - Swimming pool heater per unit (2003) $25.00 - Air exchanger (2003) $20.00 - Gas or oil space heater per unit (2003) $20.00 - Gas direct vent heater per unit (2003) $20.00 - Gas fireplace, Gas log or insert (2003) $20.00 • Commercial - All commercial work (2004)1.25% of estimated job cost Plus $50.00 Proposed 1.85 % of estimated job cost Plus $74.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $15.00 Proposed $30.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $22.00 Proposed $30.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $37.00 Proposed $30.00 Proposed $30.00 Proposed $30.00 Proposed $30.00 - Mechanical plan review 25% of the permit fee The residential & commercial fees were increased per the city fee study. The 25% plan review fee is a new fee commercial only because there are project that have mechanical plan without building permit and now the city does a plan review for free on those jobs. 9 Exhibit A Page 1 of 2 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Permit Fees Estimated Fee Annual 2004 2005 Volume Fee Fee DEMOLITION PERMIT FEE Tenant improvement remodeling prior to building permit 12 63 100 Structures not connected to utilities 12 63 65 Structures connected to city utilities 9 63 150 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE 906 Set through contract with Contract Electrical Inspector 0 80% of the permit as it has been Add $9.25 Admin Fee to all electrical permits CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY INSPECTION FEE Residential 20 0 50 Commercial 10 100 Temporary / Seasonal C of O 20 50 MANUFACTURED HOME PERMIT FEE New installation or replacement 21 41 150 MOVING PERMIT FEE Moving over private property only 2 53 56 Investigation fee 47 /hour 50 /hour PLUMBING PERMIT FEE Residential (plus $9 for each fixture opening) 260 25 43 Commerical work 2.15% of estimated job cost plus 66 50 86 SWIMMING POOL PERMIT FEE Above ground 4 50 100 Below ground 11 100 150 OTHER PERMIT FEES Fence over 6 feet in height 2 0 75 Deck 100 50 100 Residential roof 200 50 100 Residential siding 50 51 100 Utility structures (over 120s.f. but not greater than 200s.f.) 5 50 100 Drain the 3 0 75 Minimum fee 5 0 75 MISCELLANEOUS FEES Replacement inspection record card 1 25 25 Re-stamping job site plan sets 1 25 25 P:\Finance\Excel\Misc\FEES_HCVG Piping 12/8/2004 10 Exhibit A Page 2 of 2 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Permit Fees Estimated Fee Annual 2004 2005 Volume Fee Fee MECHANICAL PERMIT FEE Residential: 640 Minimum Fee 25 37 Gas Piping (repair or installation) 10 15 Gas or Oil Fired Furnaces or Boilers 20 30 Warm Air or Hot Water Heating System Construction or alt. of any warm air furnace per unit 25 37 Construction or alt. of each hot water system 25 37 Installation or replacement of each hot water system 25 37 per unit Per unit heaters, based on first 100,000 BTU input 15 22 Air Conditioning -new or replacement 20 30 Other Wood-burning furnace -per unit 25 37 Swimming pool heater -per unit 25 37 Air exchanger 20 30 Gas or oil space heater -per unit 20 30 Gas direct vent heater -per unit 20 30 Gas fireplace -gas, log or insert 20 30 Commerical: 94 All commercial work (plus 1.85% of estimated job cost) 50 74 Mechanical plan review (percent of permit fee) 25% P:\Finance\Excel\Misc\FEES_HCVG Piping 12/8/2004 11 Exhibit B ORDINANCE NO. BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Permit Fees Article II Building Code Sections 12-37, 12-38 & 12-39 of the Building Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as follows: Building Permit Fee: Permit fee to be based on job cost valuation. The determination of value or valuation shall be made by the building official. The value to be used in computing the building permit and building plan review fees shall be the total of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. TOTAL VALUATION Fee $1.00 to $500.00 $25.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $25.00 for the first $500.00 plus $3.25 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $73.75 for the first $2,00.00 plus $14.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $413.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $10.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $681.75 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.50 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,056.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,456.75 for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.00 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $5,956.75 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $4.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof Other Inspections and Fees: Per Hour 1. Inspection outside of normal business hours (minimum charge -two hours) $75.00 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of the MN State Building Codes $50.00 3. Inspecition for which no fee is specifically indicated $50.00 4. For use of outside consultants for plan checking, inspections and similar costs Actual costs Actual costs include administrative and overhead costs. Investigation Fee: Work without a Permit Whenever any work for which a permit is required from the city has been commenced without first obtaining said permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this code. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person from compliance with all other provisions of this code nor from any penalty prescribed by law. Plan Review Fee: • When a building permit is required and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan review fee shall be paid. Plan review fees for all buildings shall be sixty five percent (65°~) of the building permit fee, except as modified in M.S.B.C. Section 1300. • The plan review fees specified are separate fees from the permit fees specified and are in addition to the permit fees. • When submittal documents are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review or when the project involves deferred submittal items an additional plan review fee shall be charged at the above rate. • Expiration of plan review. Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days on request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action from being taken. No application shall be extended more than once. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee. Refund Fee: • The building official may authorize refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected. • The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done under a permit issued in accordance with this code. • The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan review is done. • The building official shall not authorize refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment. 12 Agenda # Hl MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: December 6, 2004 RE: Intoxicating Liquor and 3.2 Beer License Fee Increase Introduction Since 1997 the City Council has approved an annual increase in the intoxicating liquor and beer license fees. The State Statute requirement of notification of license holders has been met. On advisement of Finance Director Faust, for the 12-month period ended August 31, 2004 the inflation rate is 2.5%. The 2005 license fees are proposed below: Intoxicating Liquor License currently $6,825 increase by 2.5% _ $6,995 On-Sale Beer License currently $207 increase by 2.5% _ $212 Off-Sale Beer License currently $54 increase by 2.5% _ $55 Recommendation It is recommended that Council approve an increase of 2.5% to the above license fees as requested. AGENDA NO. H-2 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET AND TAX LEVY DATE: December 7, 2004 Another public hearing on the proposed property taxes and budget for 2005 has been scheduled for December 13 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. State law requires that the final property tax levy and budget be adopted at this public hearing. It is recommended that resolutions be approved to adopt the 2005 Budget and to levy property taxes payable in 2005. These resolutions will be distributed at the Council meeting and will include budget and tax levy changes that are made by the Council at the December 6 meeting. P\agn\05BudgetAdoptionHearing AGENDA ITEM H-3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Pubic Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: County Road D Court Improvements (New Cty Road D to TH 61), Project 04-06, Public Hearing - 7:15 pm Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications (4 votes required to adopt resolution) DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction As part of the realignment of County Road D, west of Trunk Highway 61, the existing portion of County Road D will become a local street and will become a culdesac. Ramsey County will provide funds as part of the turnback of the roadway, and because the roadway is on the Maplewood-Vadnais Heights border, a joint improvement project is required. A preliminary report identifying the necessary improvements has been prepared on the improvements and a public hearing is proposed for December 13, 2004. Background The culdesacing of this roadway is a requirement of improvements being proposed by MnDOT. These improvements include an acceleration lane from the exit ramp from I-694 to southbound TH 61. MnDOT will be providing a cooperative agreement award of $312,062 that pays 100% of the cost of the acceleration lane work. Additionally, MnDOT will be providing $25,000 toward the construction of the culdesac. Ramsey County policy calls for a roadway upgrade contribution of $64,099. The remainder of the project is a split of improvements between Maplewood and Vadnais Heights. The Vadnais Heights contribution is $62,042. The final Maplewood share is $190,537. Of this amount, assessment under the City's roadway reconstruction policy and provisions for new water main service will justify assessments of $75,270. The remaining funds ($115,267) are proposed to be paid through City debt service and an allocation of $29,921 from St. Paul Regional Water Services for water main costs. The attached preliminary report identifies the project cost at $653,740 and shows the proposed improvements in two segments: the culdesac roadway and the acceleration lane. A public hearing is proposed to be held on December 13, 2004 at 7:15 pm for the Maplewood portion of the work. Vadnais Heights will be conducting a separate improvement hearing for their portion of this project. Maplewood will administer this project for Vadnais Heights for a small fee added to their portion of the work. Recommendation It is recornrnended that the city council adopt the attached resolution ordering the proaect! authorising the preparation of plans. and. specifications and approving the proaect financing plan for the County Road Q Court Improvements (New County Road D to TH 61}. Four votes are required to adopt this. resolution. Attachments: Resolution Preliminary Report Location Map RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 22nd day of November, 2004, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the County Road D Court Improvements (New County Road D to TH 61), City Project 04-06, and TH 61 Acceleration Lane Improvements, City Project 03-07. AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on December 13, 2004, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to County Road D Court according to said feasibility study for City Project 04-06. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in this council resolution adopted this 13th day of December 2004. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. The City Engineer has reported that said project shall be constructed in coordination with other improvements along and adjacent to TH 61. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to combine said projects as part of the final plans and specifications and report to the City Council for final approval on said combined projects at the time of plan approval. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $653,740 shall be established. The proposed financing plan is as follows: Ramsey County Funds $ 64,099 MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funds for culdesac $ 25,000 MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funds for Accel Lane $312,062 City of Vadnais Heights $ 62,042 Street and Storm Assessments: $ 75,270 St Paul Regional Water Service $ 29,921 Maplewood Debt Service Fund 85 346 Total: $653,740 Feasibility Report County Road D Court TH 61 at TH 694 Maplewood, Minnesota City Project No. 04-06 SEH No. A-MAPLE0405.00 November 5, 2004 November 5, 2004 Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109-2702 Dear Mr. Ahl: RE: County Road D Court TH 61 at TH 694 Feasibility Report Maplewood, Minnesota City Proj ect No. 04-06 SEH No. A-MAPLE0405.00 Short Elliott Hendrickson InaC (SEH) is pleased to submit the enclosed Feasibility Report for the County Road D Court improvements. This report includes specific recommendations and estimated project costs for the street and utility improvements. We are pleased to have had the opportunity to provide the report and are available for any assistance that you may require. Sincerely, Steven F. Heth, PE Project Manager nm x:Vco~napleA040500Veponi&.ipecsU\feas_crdcrtdoc County Road D Court TH 61 at TH 694 Feasibility Report Maplewood, Minnesota City Project No. 04-06 SEH No. A-MAPLE0405.00 November 5, 2004 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Steven F. Heth, PE Date: November 5, 2004 Lic. No.: 20609 Reviewed by: Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 651.490.2000 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Certification Page Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction/History ....................... ...........................................................................1 2.0 Scope ............................................... ...........................................................................2 3.0 Feasibility and Recommendations ...........................................................................2 4.0 Proposed Improvements ................ ...........................................................................2 4.1 Trail .......................................... ...........................................................................2 4.2 Acceleration Lane .................... ...........................................................................3 5.0 Easements/Permits ......................... ...........................................................................3 6.0 Estimated Project Costs ................ ...........................................................................3 7.0 Financing ......................................... ...........................................................................3 8.0 Schedule .......................................... ...........................................................................4 List of Tables Table 1 Maplewood Mall Area Studies and Reports ..............................................1 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Location Map Figure 2 County Road D Court Figure 3 TH 61 and County Road D Areas of Construction Figure 4 Typical Section List of Appendices Appendix A Estimated Project Costs Proposed Assessments SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0405.00 City of Maplewood Page i November 5, 2004 Feasibility Report County Road D Court TH 61 at TH 694 Prepared for the City of Maplewood 1.0 Introduction/History In 2001, the City of Maplewood led a group effort to address the growing traffic congestion surrounding the Maplewood Mall area. The first step in this process was the completion of the "Maplewood Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study" in December 2001. The Study outlined a number of improvements that would help alleviate congestion, including the extension of County Road D from Hazelwood to Trunk Highway (TH) 61. The collective improvements have been called the Maplewood Mall Area Traffic Improvements (MMATI). This process has continued since 2001 with the completion of the following studies and reports: Table 1 Maplewood Mall Area Studies and Reports Stud /Report Date Author Maplewood Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study December 2001 URS Feasibility Study for County Road D/TH 61 Water ~ Apri12002 URS Main Extension - Cit Pro ect No. 01-28 Draft Wetland Delineation Report- Country View Peterson Golf Course Pro e Consult. Wetland Delineation and Survey of the Hartford August 2002 AES Crrou Parcel Alternate Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), Legacy December 2002 SRF Villa eat Ma lewood Alignment Study and Report for County Road D j December 2002 URS Reali nment - Ci Pro ect 02-07, 02-08 Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the County ~ January 2003 URS Road D Reali nment Pro ect County Road D Alignment Options -City Project 02- Apri12003 URS 07,02-08 Wetland Delineation Report -County Road D May 2003 URS Reali nment Storm Water and Wetlands Plan for the Maplewood May 2003 SEH Mall Area Trans ortation Im rovements A-MAPLE0405.00 Page 1 2.0 Scope The proposed work for County Road D Court includes reconstructing County Road D to an urban section, including concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer, from the new alignment of County Road D to TH 61. The proposed alignment will terminate with a cul-de-sac. Water main will be installed by the City of Vadnais Heights and by the St. Paul Water utility. The proposed work on TH 61 at TH 694 consists of the construction of an acceleration lane for eastbound TH 694 vehicles merging onto southbound TH 61. The project also includes median nose modifications on TH 61 to store more southbound traffic for the eastbound turning movement at TH 694. 3.0 Feasibility and Recommendations This project, in conjunction with the realignment of County Road D, is necessary to provide a safer and more efficient roadway for the traveling public. The project is cost effective because it utilizes contributions from State and County sources to offset costs to the City. The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint because it utilizes an existing alignment and has little complexity to construct. It is recommended that this project be combined with the TH 61 and County Road D intersection improvements (City Project 03-07). By doing so, the City should receive more competitive bids and have more control over construction sequencing. 4.0 Proposed Improvements The segment of County Road D from the new alignment of County Road D to TH 61 will be reconstructed to an urban section with concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. The eastern end of the reconstructed roadway will terminate in a cul-de-sac. Storm sewer catch basins will be constructed with storm sewer discharging to the existing system on TH 61. Water main will be installed along the south side of the roadway connecting two existing dead-end segments. The City of Vadnais Heights will install water main along the north side of roadway. 4.1 Trail The south side of the roadway will be designed to accommodate an on-road trail. Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0405.00 City of Maplewood Page 2 4.2 Acceleration Lane Mn/DOT has designed and will fund the construction of an acceleration lane for eastbound TH 694 to southbound TH 61. In addition, median noses in this area will be reconstructed to allow more vehicles to be stored for the left hand turning movement of TH 694 on southbound TH 61. The median opening at old County Road D will be closed. 5.0 Easements/Permits All work will be accomplished within existing rights-of--way and no easements are anticipated. A permit from the Department of Health will be required for the water main installation. 6.0 Estimated Project Costs The table below summarizes the estimated project cost. The project cost is based on a detailed estimate found in Appendix A. The cost includes a 10 percent contingency. The total project cost includes a 31.5 percent allowance for indirect costs such as engineering, administration, and legal items, as well as capitalized interest. Roadway costs include landscaping. County Road D Court Roadway .............................................................. $244,342 St. Paul Water Main ............................................. $35,294 Vadnais Heights Water Main ............................... $62,042 * Estimated Total Cost $341,678 * from Vadnais Heights Mn/DOT Acceleration Lane Roadway .............................................................. $312,062 ** * * from Mn/DOT 7.0 Financing Financing for this project will be provided by a variety of sources. These funds include County Funds, Cooperative Agreement funds, Vadnais Heights funds, special assessments, and municipal state aid funds. County Funds ................................................... Cooperative Agreement Funds for Cul-de-Sac Mn/DOT Acceleration Lane ............................ Vadnais Heights ............................................... Special Assessments ........................................ Maplewood Debt Service ................................. ...................... $64,099 ...................... $25,000 ...................... $312,062 ...................... $62,042 ...................... $75,270 ...................... $115,267 $653,740 Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0405.00 City of Maplewood Page 3 8.0 Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City Council ...................... November 22, 2004 Public Hearing ..................................................................December 13, 2004 Authorize Plans .................................................................December 13, 2004 Approve Plans and Specifications ..........................................March 14, 2005 Bid Opening ................................................................................Apri18, 2005 Award Contract .........................................................................Apri125, 2005 Assessment Hearing ..................................................................Apri125, 2005 Begin Construction ...................................................................... May 9, 2005 End Construction ...................................................................August 19, 2005 Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0405.00 City of Maplewood Page 4 List of Figures Figure 1 -Project Location Map Figure 2 - County Road D Court Figure 3 - TH 61 and County Road D Areas of Construction Figure 4 -Typical Section Appendix A Estimated Project Costs Proposed Assessments MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA County Road D Court Improvements City Project 02-08 SEH FILE A-MAPLE0405.00 NOTE ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL COST 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS $9,000.00 1.00 $9,000.00 2101.502 CLEARING TREE $280.00 8.00 $2,240.00 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE $125.00 8.00 $1,000.00 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF $2.25 208.00 $468.00 2104.501 REMOVE METAL CULVERTS LF $15.00 225.00 $3,375.00 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $280.00 1.00 $280.00 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF $3.00 152.00 $456.00 1 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY $3.25 1620.00 $5,265.00 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY $15.00 255.00 $3,825.00 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LF $15.00 99.00 $1,485.00 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 6 TON $15.00 1780.00 $26,700.00 2331.508 BITUMINOUS WEAR TYPE 41 (A) -DRIVEWAYS TON $38.00 37.00 $1,406.00 2331.508 BITUMINOUS WEAR TYPE MVWE35035C TON $45.00 260.00 $11,700.00 2331.514 BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR TYPE LVNW35030B (BASE) TON $36.00 260.00 $9,360.00 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT G $2.00 150.00 $300.00 2501.515 12" RC PIPE APRON WITH TRASH GUARD EACH $850.00 3.00 $2,550.00 2502.521 12" CM PIPE DRAIN LF $16.00 26.00 $416.00 2503.511 24" RC PIPE CL V LF $35.00 308.00 $10,780.00 2503.511 15" RCPIPE CL V LF $27.00 71.00 $1,917.00 2503.511 12" RC PIPE CL V LF $24.00 250.00 $6,000.00 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH $42.00 1.00 $42.00 2504.602 1" CURB STOP AND BOX EACH $160.00 1.00 $160.00 2504.602 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE AND BOX EACH $1,500.00 2.00 $3,000.00 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH $700.00 1.00 $700.00 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN EACH $400.00 2.00 $800.00 2504.602 HYDRANT EACH $2,500.00 1.00 $2,500.00 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE LF $22.00 23.00 $506.00 2504.603 12" DUCTILE WATER MAIN LF $35.00 442.00 $15,470.00 2504.603 6" DUCTILE IRON WATER MAIN LF $25.00 13.00 $325.00 2504.608 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS LB $2.75 326.00 $896.50 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (2'X3') EACH $800.00 1.00 $800.00 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (48") EACH $1,200.00 4.00 $4,800.00 2506.501 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE (54") EACH $1,700.00 3.00 $5,100.00 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH $500.00 8.00 $4,000.00 2506.522 ADJUST SANITARY MANHOLE CASTING EACH $250.00 1.00 $250.00 2506.602 ADJUST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE CASTING EACH $250.00 8.00 $2,000.00 2506.602 RECONSTRUCT SANITARY STRUCTURE EACH $900.00 1.00 $900.00 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP CL. III W/ GEOTETILE FABRIC CL. IV CY $100.00 10.00 $1,000.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B612 LF $7.00 236.00 $1,652.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER B618 LF $7.00 1300.00 $9,100.00 2531.604 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER LF $5.20 200.00 $1,040.00 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA County Road D Court Improvements City Project 02-08 SEH FILE A-MAPLE0405.00 NOTE ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL COST 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $2,500.00 1.00 $2,500.00 2564.603 4" SOLID LINE WHITE -EPOXY LF $1.00 860.00 $860.00 2575.505 SODDING TYPE LAWN SY $5.00 2220.00 $11,100.00 2531.602 PEDESTRIAN RAMP EACH $325.00 6.00 $1,950.00 2503.511 27" RC PIPE CL. V LF $55.00 228.00 $12,595.00 2503.511 30" RC PIPE CL. V LF $70.00 115.00 $8,050.00 2501.515 15" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD EACH $900.00 1.00 $900.00 2501.515 30" RC PIPE APRON W/ TRASH GUARD EACH $1,800.00 1.00 $1,800.00 SUBTOTAL $193,319.50 NOTES: + 10% CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCIES ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $19,331.95 $212,651.45 1 BITUMINOUS REMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO COMMON EXCAVATION + 31.5% LEGAL, FISCAL, ADMIN., & ENGINEERING $66,985.21 TOTAL $279,636.66 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TH 61 State Project SP 6286-46 City Project 04-06 SEH FILE A-MAPLE0402.00 STATEMENT OF ESTIMITATED QUANTITIES CHART INO ITEM UNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES PRICE PRICE 2021.5 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 23115.69 E 2101.5 CLEARING ACRE 0.5 1207.37 603.69 E 2101.51 GRUBBING ACRE 0.5 1204.28 602.14 I 2104.5 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) LIN FT 6 8.07 48.42 I 2104.5 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS LIN FT 324 6.32 2047.68 F 2104.5 REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 400 1.78 712.00 F 2104.5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS WALK SQ YD 184 0.43 79.12 F 2104.51 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SQ YD 448 0.36 161.28 F 2104.51 REMOVE CONCRETE WALK SQ YD 272 0.29 78.88 F 2104.51 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1111 1.68 1866.48 I 2104.51 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH 1 221.78 221.78 L 2104.51 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C EACH 26 30.85 802.10 L 2104.51 REMOVE SIGN TYPED EACH 1 47.05 47.05 L 2104.51 REMOVE MARKER EACH 1 12.64 12.64 I 2104.51 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 7 182.52 1277.64 G 2104.51 REMOVE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 1 144 144.00 H 2104.51 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 895 1.48 1324.60 H 2104.51 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LIN FT 196 1.88 368.48 L 2104.52 SALVAGE SIGN PANEL TYPE C EACH 1 100 100.00 L 2104.52 SALVAGE SIGN TYPED EACH 4 68.98 275.92 L 2104.52 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE C EACH 3 32.23 96.69 L 2104.52 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE SPECIAL EACH 2 21.89 43.78 N 2104.52 SALVAGE SERVICE CABINET EACH 1 207.42 207.42 A 2105.5 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 2604 2.57 6692.28 A 2105.51 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 3168 3.17 10042.56 A 2105.52 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CU YD 3250 3.53 11472.50 A 2105.53 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CU YD 311 8.68 2699.48 B 2211.5 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 6 CU YD 1376 10.35 14241.60 B 2221.5 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING (CV) CLASS 2 CU YD 57 23.04 1313.28 B 2357.5 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 559 0.81 452.79 B 2360.5 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (4,E) TON 1016 28.16 28610.56 B 2360.5 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEAR COURSE MIX (4,E) TON 808 37.5 30300.00 K 2501.51 15" CS PIPE CULVERT LIN FT 139 24.79 3445.81 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TH 61 State Project SP 6286-46 City Project 04-06 SEH FILE A-MAPLE0402.00 STATEMENT OF ESTIMITATED QUANTITIES CHART INO ITEM UNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES PRICE PRICE K 2501.51 18" RC PIPE CULVERT LIN FT 66 30.99 2045.34 K 2501.51 30" RC PIPE CULVERT LIN FT 4 50.01 200.04 K 2501.57 15" CS SAFETY APRON EACH 2 100 200.00 K 2501.57 15" RC SAFETY APRON EACH 2 360.35 720.70 K 2501.57 18" RC SAFETY APRON EACH 2 446.06 892.12 K 2501.57 30" RC SAFETY APRON EACH 1 511.65 511.65 K 2503.51 12" RC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 6 23.07 138.42 K 2503.51 15" RC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 16 33.6 537.60 K 2506.5 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN C OR G LIN FT 4 198.9 795.60 K 2506.52 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 3 376.27 1128.81 I 2506.6 RECONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE LIN FT 10 204 2040.00 K 2511.5 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS II CU YD 4 53.68 214.72 K 2511.51 GRANULAR FILTER CU YD 2 23.29 46.58 C 2521.5 4" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 982 2.33 2288.06 C 2531.5 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B424 LIN FT 172 8.51 1463.72 C 2531.5 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN D424 LIN FT 241 10.74 2588.34 G 2540.6 MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 1 117 117.00 N 2545.52 2" RIGID STEEL CONDUIT LIN FT 90 8.12 730.80 N 2545.52 3" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT (DIRECTIONAL BORE) LIN FT 250 14.51 3627.50 N 2545.53 UNDERGROUND WIRE 1 COND NO 2 LIN FT 270 0.87 234.90 N 2545.53 ARMORED CABLE 4 COND NO 4 LIN FT 2170 5 10850.00 N 2545.54 SERVICE CABINET SECONDARY TYPE L1 EACH 1 3633.48 3633.48 N 2545.55 EQUIPMENT PAD B EACH 1 988.02 988.02 N 2545.6 HANDHOLE EACH 1 620.99 620.99 L 2564.53 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 76 18.79 1428.04 L 2564.54 INSTALL SIGN PANEL TYPE C EACH 1 14.83 14.83 L 2564.54 INSTALL SIGN TYPED EACH 4 174.76 699.04 L 2564.55 HAZARD MARKER X4-2 EACH 2 53.1 106.20 L 2564.56 END OF ROADWAY MARKER X4-11 EACH 2 74.06 148.12 O 2564.6 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT ARROW) EPOXY EACH 8 80.19 641.52 O 2564.6 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW-EPOXY LIN FT 1953 0.22 429.66 0 2564.6 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-EPOXY LIN FT 2010 0.17 341.70 0 2564.6 8" SOLID LINE WHITE-EPOXY LIN FT 520 2.99 1554.80 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA TH 61 State Project SP 6286-46 City Project 04-06 SEH FILE A-MAPLE0402.00 STATEMENT OF ESTIMITATED QUANTITIES CHART INO ITEM UNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITIES PRICE PRICE 0 2564.6 4" BROKEN LINE WHITE-EPOXY LIN FT 40 0.23 9.20 M 2565.62 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM A SYSTEM 1 6265 109325.00 M 2565.62 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM B SYSTEM 1 8118.6 12800.00 D 2573.5 SILT FENCE, TYPE MACHINE SLICED LIN FT 670 1.55 1038.50 D 2573.51 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECK TYPE 3 LIN FT 90 4.4 396.00 D 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION TYPE A EACH 2 95.21 190.42 D 2575.5 SEEDING ACRE 1 115.5 115.50 D 2575.51 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 3 TON 1.8 165.42 297.76 D 2575.52 EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS CATEGORY 1 SQ YD 1941 1.13 2193.33 D 2575.53 COMMERCIAL FERT ANALYSIS 22-5-10 POUND 308 0.33 101.64 D 2575.61 SEED MIXTURE 250 POUND 62 1.74 107.88 SUBTOTAL 288,946.17 MOBILIZATION 23,115.69 TOTAL 312,061.86 H Z W W a 0 D a °~ r H Z 7 O U ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ o z uJ O ~ O O O V O N O O W N N N M N EA N EA M EA V c0 EA ~ (n EA ~ ~ W Q J Q H O H O N U W ~ J J ~ O N ~ ~ c0 ~ M O ~ N T ~ ~ ~ N ~ 7 N M N d U ~ e» r~ .N o X W o °0 0 0 0 C ~ 0 N 0 N 0 ~ 0 I~ 0 V N O O L "O M V c0 ~ N N O O N ~ (6 ~ T EF} EA EA EA N ~ ~ N rn N = O U N ~ N Z rn N O O O O O O O O O V O V N M O O N ~ W O N O N O ~ O I~ O M V M M N M O N (`') C ~ M c0 EA N O _ _ I~ r EA O M _ _ N O ~ ~ EA EA EA EA EA EA ~ O ~ T _ N U ~ ~ N rn fn ~ p U N ~ O ~ O N L 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O U O M O 0 O O O O W c 0 N O ~ Y ~ ~ V ~ N _ N ~ o ° a -o EA EA EA EA o ~ ~ m ~ ~ N N 'O O rn ~ U ~ L ~ N ~ O ~ ~ U W ~ ~ ~ Q Z ~ ~ o a O ~ ¢ ~ ch c o r ~_ _ ~_ Z ~ Z U ~ O ~ U L ~ ~ ~ J O ~ LL N (n 0 N W (n O r M H Z ~ e» (~ Z ~ ~ i~ W O ~ Z ~ O ~ `~ c~i 3 ~ a. W Q W a. W O > N ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ Q (6 (n T (n Q W ~ Z ~ W Q W Q ~ Q W ~ Z ~ ~ (0 (0 m ~ (n ~ z cn ~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ cn °O W W N ~ O O N N C O .O C O 7 7 L .3 `o .~ a N r O N O U N O a` _T U a m 3 .~ N N N ~6 C c6 N a nan ke BE CASTLE AVE. COPE AVE. ~ PROJECT LOCATION --~"- J FILE N0. LOCATION MAP PHONE: ~ss~) aso-loco AMAPLE0405.00 COUNTY ROAD D COURT pQ.~r ~ ss3s vaoNais ceNrER oR. TH 61 AT TH 694 ~. 1 SOH sr. Fain, MN ss>>o DATE: C s/4/o4 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA I ' IF R/W 4" TOPSOIL AND SUITABLE MATER 6' VARIES :ONC. R/W AND GUTTER I R/W VARIOUS /L VARIOUS 618 CONC. R/W 16'-50' 16'-50' CURB AND GUTTER 4" TOPSOIL AND SO ~ P _29: 1' ~• SUITABLE MATERIAL ETAIL A COUNTY ROAD D COURT STA. 8+00 TO 9+57.83 DETAIL A a ;~ 3d ~~ ~~ ~~ 3= ~~~ u `o " TYPE LV 2350 WEARING COURSE UMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT " TYPE LV 2350 BASE COURSE ~' AGGREGATE CL 6 (MOD. 5R) ~i LE N o. TYPICAL SECTIONS ~_ 35305 VADN6AIS) cENTERODR. AMAPLE0405.00 COUNTY ROAD D COURT F1C~ 4 SEH ST. PAUL, MN 55110 °ATE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 11 /12/04 COUNTY ROAD D COURT STA. 3+56.58 TO 8+00 AGENDA ITEM H-4 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: TH 61 East Frontage Road Improvements (New Cty Road D to 694), C.P. 04-25 Public Hearing - 7:30 pm: Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications (4 votes required to adopt this resolution) DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction The city has been working on various roadway improvements along Trunk Highway 61 in cooperation with MnDOT and the local businesses. Access points and driveways are a major concern for traffic movement. All efforts to consolidate the driveways are being made to improve safety and traffic efficiency. MnDOT, Lexus, city engineering staff, Kline Volvo and Kline Nissan are jointly proposing a driveway consolidation project that will combine their driveways and provide a frontage road along the eastern section of the roadway. A preliminary report has been prepared on the improvements and a public hearing is proposed for December 13, 2004. Background The combinations of driveway points along the eastern side of TH 61 between new County Road D and I-694 are part of the long-term traffic solution for this area. MnDOT has provided the city with a cooperative agreement award of $540,000 that includes consideration of driveway consolidation. Kline Volvo is interested in providing a frontage road system that serves their property and connects to the Nissan site. Lexus has also agreed to participate in the frontage road that would consolidate three driveways into a single driveway. The frontage road would also provide an area for off-loading new vehicles that is not on the public road system. The frontage road would be a private roadway that would be maintained by the private businesses. The reason for this project being constructed by the city is that access points and median improvements need to be constructed by a public agency according to MnDOT requirements. The city will facilitate the improvements and assess the costs back to the private business. The attached preliminary report identifies the project cost at $356,085 and shows the proposed improvements connecting the three car dealers with a single frontage road. Wetland impacts have been minimized to 1,300 square feet of degraded wetland which will be mitigated as new wetland within the area. The financing plan includes assessments to each property based upon benefit received along with the use of the Cooperative Agreement Funds to be received from MnDOT for the local share. There are no city tax dollars going to this project. Engineering expenses will be paid through the Trunk Highway 61 improvements being implemented by the city, since this frontage road will benefit that project. A public hearing is proposed to be held on December 13, 2004 at 7:30 pm. Recommendation It is recornrnended that. the ci y council. adopt the attached' resolu ion approving the preliminary report. for the TH 61 East Frontage Road (New County Road D to 694),.. Gity Protect. Q4-25, and call a public hearing for December 13, 20Q4 at 7:3Q p.rn. Attachments: Resolution Preliminary Report RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the 22nd day of November, 2004, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed street improvements for the improvement of TH 61 Improvements (New County Road D to 694), City Project 04-25 and City Project 03-07 AND WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was duly held on December 13, 2004, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, as detailed in the feasibility report, that the City of Maplewood make improvements to the TH 61 East Frontage Road according to said feasibility study for City Project 04-25 and 03-07. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in this council resolution adopted this 13th day of December 2004. 3. The city engineer is designated engineer for this improvement and is hereby directed to prepare final plans and specifications for the making of said improvement. The City Engineer has reported that said project shall be constructed in coordination with other improvements along and adjacent to TH 61. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to combine said projects as part of the final plans and specifications and report to the City Council for final approval on said combined projects at the time of plan approval. 4. The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers necessary to implement the financing plan for the project. A project budget of $356,085 shall be established. The proposed financing plan is as follows: MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funds $ 81,085 Kline Nissan Assessment $145,000 Kline Volvo Assessment $ 75,000 Lexus Assessment 55 000 Total: $356,085 Feasibility Report TH 61 Frontage Road Maplewood, Minnesota City Project No. 03-07 SEH No. A-MAPLE0402.00 November 5, 2004 November 5, 2004 Mr. R. Charles Ahl, PE City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109-2702 Dear Mr. Ahl: RE: TH 61 Frontage Road Feasibility Report Maplewood, Minnesota City Project No. 03-07 SEH No. A-MAPLE0402.00 Short Elliott Hendrickson Ina C7 (SEH) is pleased to submit the enclosed Feasibility Report for the TH 61 Frontage Road improvements. This report includes specific recommendations and estimated project costs for the street and utility improvements. We are pleased to have had the opportunity to provide the report and are available for any assistance that you may require. Sincerely, Steven F. Heth, PE Project Manager nm x:Vco~napleA040200Veponi&.ipecsU\feas th6Ldoc TH 61 Frontage Road Feasibility Report Maplewood, Minnesota City Project No. 03-07 SEH No. A-MAPLE0402.00 November 5, 2004 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Steven F. Heth, PE Date: November 5, 2004 Lic. No.: 20609 Reviewed by: Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 651.490.2000 Table of Contents Letter of Transmittal Certification Page Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction/History ....................... ...........................................................................1 2.0 Scope ............................................... ...........................................................................2 3.0 Feasibility and Recommendations ...........................................................................2 4.0 Proposed Improvements ................ ...........................................................................2 5.0 Wetland Impact ............................... ...........................................................................2 6.0 Existing Utilities .............................. ...........................................................................3 7.0 Easement/Permits ........................... ...........................................................................3 8.0 Estimated Project Costs ................ ...........................................................................3 9.0 Financing ......................................... ...........................................................................3 10.0 Schedule .......................................... ...........................................................................3 List of Tables Table 1 Maplewood Mall Area Studies and Reports ..............................................................1 List of Figures Figure 1 -Project Location Map Figure 2 -Typical Sections Figure 3 -Plan View Frontage Road List of Appendices Appendix A Estimated Project Costs SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0402.00 City of Maplewood Page i November 5, 2004 Feasibility Report TH 61 Frontage Road Prepared for the City of Maplewood 1.0 Introduction/History In 2001, the City of Maplewood led a group effort to address the growing traffic congestion surrounding the Maplewood Mall area. The first step in this process was the completion of the "Maplewood Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study" in December 2001. The Study outlined a number of improvements that would help alleviate congestion, including the extension of County Road D from Hazelwood to Trunk Highway (TH) 61. The collective improvements have been called the Maplewood Mall Area Traffic Improvements (MMATI). This process has continued since 2001 with the completion of the following studies and reports: Table 1 Maplewood Mall Area Studies and Reports Study/Report Date Author Maplewood Mall Area Comprehensive Traffic Study December 2001 URS Feasibility Study for County Road D/TH 61 Water Apri12002 URS Main Extension -City Project No. 01-28 Draft Wetland Delineation Report- Country View Peterson Golf Course Property Consult. Wetland Delineation and Survey of the Hartford August 2002 AES Crroup Parcel Alternate Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), Legacy December 2002 SRF Village at Maplewood Alignment Study and Report for County Road D December 2002 URS Realignment -City Project 02-07, 02-08 Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the County January 2003 URS Road D Realignment Project County Road D Alignment Options -City Project 02- Apri12003 URS 07,02-08 Wetland Delineation Report -County Road D May 2003 URS Realignment Storm Water and Wetlands Plan for the Maplewood May 2003 SEH Mall Area Transportation Improvements A-MAPLE0402.00 Page 1 As a result of the studies and by observation, it was noted that the three car dealerships located between the existing County Road D and the new alignment of County Road D currently park and unload transports on the shoulder of TH 61. This creates an unsafe situation for vehicles traveling on TH 61 and for the unloading operation. To alleviate the problem, City staff has worked with the three car dealerships to create a concept plan to serve the needs of the transport deliveries and customer traffic. The purpose of this report is to describe the proposed improvements and estimate the cost. It is anticipated that this information will be presented to the Maplewood City Council on December 13, 2004. 2.0 Scope The proposed work includes the construction of a 24-foot wide frontage road from the existing entrance to Lexus of Maplewood on the south to existing County Road D on the north. It also includes the construction of a left turn lane for south bound TH 61. 3.0 Feasibility and Recommendations This project is necessary to provide a safer location for vehicle transports to park and unload, along with a safer access point for customer traffic to access the three dealerships. This project is cost effective because it will be constructed within existing right-of--way, built to minimum required widths, and with minimal soils corrections. This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint because it is relatively simple in design, cost effective, and will provide greater safety for the traveling public. It is recommended that this project be combined with the TH 61 and County Road D intersection project for more competitive pricing and for better scheduling of construction and access. 4.0 Proposed Improvements The proposed frontage road will be designed and constructed to provide a 28- foot face-of--curb to face-of--curb road width. Storm sewer catch basins will be installed to collect surface water and discharge to the existing system on TH 61. Collected water will be treated with a storm ceptor. 5.0 Wetland Impact Every attempt will be made to minimize wetland impact during final design. It is estimated that approximately 1300 square feet of existing wetland will be filled as a result of the frontage road. Mitigation of this wetland will be accomplished at the new wetland on the adjacent property. A separate wetland report will be submitted. Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0402.00 City of Maplewood Page 2 6.0 Existing Utilities The St. Paul Water Utility has a 12-inch trunk water main running under the proposed alignment of the frontage road. Where the proposed grade varies from the existing grade by more than 1 foot, the water main will require grade adjustment. 7.0 Easement/Permits Temporary easements from all three car dealerships will need to be described and attained. A permit from Mn/DOT will be required to work within Mn/DOT right-of- way. 8.0 Estimated Project Costs The table below summarizes the estimated project cost. The project cost is based on a detailed estimate found in Appendix A. The cost includes a 2 percent contingency. The total project cost includes a 15 percent allowance for indirect costs such as engineering, administration, and legal items, as well as capitalized interest. 9.0 Financing Financing for this project will be provided by the three dealerships and Cooperative Agreement Funds. Cooperative Agreement Funds ................................................. $81,085.00 Kline Nissan .............................................................................. $145,000.00 Kline Volvo .............................................................................. $75,000.00 Lexus ......................................................................................... $55,000.00 $356,085.00 10.0 Schedule Present Feasibility Report to City Council ...................... November 22, 2004 Public Hearing ..................................................................December 13, 2004 Authorize Plans .................................................................December 13, 2004 Approve Plans and Specifications ..........................................March 14, 2005 Bid Opening ................................................................................Apri18, 2005 Award Contract .........................................................................Apri125, 2005 Assessment Hearing ..................................................................Apri125, 2005 Begin Construction ...................................................................... May 9, 2005 End Construction ...................................................................August 19, 2005 Feasibility Report A-MAPLE0402.00 City of Maplewood Page 3 List of Figures Figure 1 -Project Location Map Figure 2 - Typical Sections Figure 3 -Plan View Frontage Road N ~ ~1 PROJECT LOCATION u COUNTY F HIGHRIDGE CT. ~ F a ,., o ~ ~ - ~ o w ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ Q ~ ~ LY[ ~ 4. o w 1 o . a ~ ST. JOHN'S Q ~ 2. "IT T. BLVD. z Q ~ `~ z ' T IEW SIR. z, z Y ~ ~ ° ~ ~ AVE. BEAM BE © ; ~ Q o RA DATZ 0 o ~ ~, ~ c z N ~ ke _ Q ~~ ~ ~ z Q y '7 Q C ~U 'T m ~ v i- ~ ~ ~ KOHL MAN AVE. `` ~' ~' ~ w s KOHLMAN ~ ~ ~ r r, ~ ~ Q v e~wood w D A~/E. ~ --- ~ ~ ~ ~ Park ~ z w ~ = ~ JNTY ROAD ~' C _____ m ~ Q > - Hl~~ T ~ ~ ~ ~- z ~ r man Pork Op ~~ ~ ~r ~ \ ' ~~ SEY ~ Z ~ ~ Q ~ F- W o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ _ ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ EDGEHILL RD . CON NOR ~ ~ ~ ~ AVE. ~ ~ DEMO T AVE. ~ m _ ~ ~ - - cn o VE. ~ E ~- o ~ AVE. ~ ~ E~ EVENTH Q c~, ~„ ~~ T{1NT z Q ~ Q ~~~~ ;EXTANT g AVE . ( /) Seosons ~ P k ~ AVE. ~ ar ~ GEI AVE ~ G V I `'~ Q ~ V GRA E. T m VIKING DR. ~ SHERREN AVE. CASTLE AVE. ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' Lake ~ COPE COPE AVE. ~ COPE AVE. ~ z LARK Q ~ CT_ U ~ ~a ~ AVE. ~ ~ LARK Q AVE. ~- J ~ ~ ~ U' i of iF / , FILE N 0. LOCATION MAP PHONE: _ (651) aso-2ooo AMAPLE0402.01 TH. 61 EAST FRONTAGE ROAD EXHIBIT 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. ST. PAUL, MN 55110 DATE: TH 61 AT TH (i.94 NO. 1 ~~~ 11/12/04 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA e c u L L F F C C RAW ``` THRU LANE ~ 14' ~ - 2~~~ B618 C^NC, CURB & GUTTER THRU LANE 14' 2~~~ _~ DETAIL DETAIL A RAW 2 ~~~ MPX, y1 ~'' BACKFILL WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL 2" WEARING C^URSE 2" N^NMEARING C^URSE 6" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 ~ GRANULAR MATERIAL FILL 3 TYPICAL SECTION T.H. 61 FRONTAGE ROAD PROPOSED FILE N ^, T.H. 61 FRONTAGE ROAD PHONE: C651) ago-2ooo AMAPLE0402,01 FIGURE 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTIONS ~EH ST. PAUL, MN 55110 DATE 2 11/12/04 MAPLEW^^D, MINNES^TA e° w N 2~` ~s`~ ~~o ~3 m ~~ Op ao m m 0 ~~ ~ ~ a~ so m x w a ~. '. _ _~,,. _ =` `i- ~: ~__, ~_~~,. ~ ~_~: ~~ _- ~-: ~; ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ w~ _~:~T ~`` ~+'~ ~_~~ :~ _~~ = ~ .=~~ _~ ~,=. = + ~~'~,..~~ . T. =l~~i+~= ~~ ~ y ~~ -~a~~ s ~ ~~ ~ AT F i~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~a~ ~. ' __~_ ~'~~._ :~ -- -_=~~ -=~_ ;~ -~- _ =,= __ __ __ =_~ - __ __ _= _ '~ ~_ __ _- ~~ ~ T -_ ,_.~, :~; ~_ _=~ - = ~~- ~~_~ :~ ~ -_ ~ . ` = _ ~_~ - -_ -~ _ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~~ ,r. ~~ -_ L _' ~ ~' ~~ ~ - _ ~~ =I ~ ~~ -- ~_ == =_ _~ _~~ _ -~! ~= - I~-• ~~~ ~,_ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ -~~~ ~_:~ _ ~Z:~ _ ~._ =„~~: ~~=:~ -~~~a. ~.~~_-. -_~;~; _~___ ~, ~_. _~ =~. "S ~~' ~: ~~' .~ ~ ~~ $- ~ . - __ ~._ Appendix A Estimated Project Costs T.H.61 FRONTAGE RD MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEH PROJECT NO. A-MAPLE0402.00 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2 REMOVE BITUMINOUS SY 581 $2.00 $1,162.00 3 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 150 $2.00 $300.00 4 WETLAND MITIGATION (CONSTRUCTION) SF 2600 $0.70 $1,820.00 5 LAND ACQUISITION SF 2600 6 ADJUST (MCES) SANITARY MH EACH 1 $200.00 $200.00 7 WATER MAIN TRENCH LF 600 $30.00 $18,000.00 8 12" DIP (ST. PAUL TO INSTALL) LF 600 $60.00 $36,000.00 9 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CL. V LF 100 $28.00 $2,800.00 10 18" RCP STORM SEWER, CL. V LF 300 $30.00 $9,000.00 11 21"RCP STORM SEWER, CL. V LF 50 $35.00 $1,750.00 12 36" RCP STORM SEWER, CL III LF 40 $55.00 $2,200.00 13 15" RCP APRON W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 14 21"RCP APRON W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 15 36" RCP APRON W/TRASH GUARD EACH 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 16 RANDOM RIP RAP CL. 3 CY 24 $100.00 $2,400.00 17 CATCH BASIN EACH 4 $1,350.00 $5,400.00 18 5' DIA. STORM MANHOLE LF 20 $225.00 $4,500.00 19 STORM CEPTOR W/INSTALLATION EACH 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 20 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 3200 $5.00 $16,000.00 21 MUCK EXCAVATION CY 1675 $5.00 $8,375.00 22 GRANULAR BORROW CY 3200 $9.00 $28,800.00 23 SELECT BORROW CY 1650 $12.00 $19,800.00 24 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TON 1970 $15.00 $29,550.00 25 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL BASE (NON WEAR) TON 702 $33.00 $23,166.00 26 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL (WEAR) TON 731 $33.00 $24,123.00 27 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL (TACK COAT) GAL 512 $2.50 $1,280.00 28 B 6-18 CURB & GUTTER LF 2888 $8.50 $24,548.00 29 SILT FENCE HEAVY DUTY LF 1100 $2.50 $2,750.00 30 4" TOP SOIL CY 65 $14.00 $910.00 31 SODDING, TYPE LAWN SY 1200 $2.50 $3,000.00 32 4" SOLID LINE WHITE LF 305 $2.50 $762.50 33 SIGN PANELS SF 50 $30.00 $1,500.00 34 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LEFT TURN) POLY PREFORM EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 35 SALVAGE AND INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH 5 $100.00 $500.00 36 BURY OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LS 1 $0.00 37 RELOCATE PARKING LOT LIGHT EACH 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 construction subtotal $304,346.50 2% contingencies $6,086.93 15% Legal, Admin, Eng. $45,651.98 PROJECT TOTAL $356,085.41 X:\KO\Maple\040200\PDF\pdf11-15\Qunattakeoff2.xls PAGE 1 OF 1 Agenda Item J1 Memo Date: 11 /16/2004 To: Richard Fursman, City Manager From: Butch Gervais, Fire Marshal RE: Trash Container Ordinance Background: Currently the city has an ordinance dealing with trash containers location on a person's property. The ordinance number is (30-7-F) this has been a good ordinance but needs some changes to make it easier for our citizens to comply. After being involved with leaving notices to citizens about the trash container location I received calls from the elderly and handicap. They were concern about having to move the containers, because they would have problems moving them in the winter. There were also calls from citizens concerned because they had problems placing the container in their backyard. Than there were the calls about placing the container in the garage and that they were not going to stick the container in the garage because of the smell or they did not have room. The other concern with placing trash containers inside the garage is the chance of fire that could occur. This is why the state code prohibits trash containers over 40 gallons to be placed inside a building (MSFC 304.3.2). The major locations for trash containers were usually along side the garage or towards the front the garage or the house with the trash was inside and the lids closed. Currently the ordinance reads: Memo: Trash Container Ordinance Containers shall be placed at the rear of the premises, or in the garage, so as to be out of view from the street and in such a manner as to not interfere with the use of adjoining property. My proposed change reads: Containers shall be placed along side the garage, side of the house or at the rear of the premises and these locations shall not interfere with any adjoining property; effort should be made to reduce the visibility or view of the trash container from the street. All trash shall be in the container and the lid closed to prevent trash from falling out. Exceptions: The City Official may allow an exception to this ordinance or the homeowner/property owner can appeal to the city council. Recommendation: To make the changes to the trash container ordinance, this would make it much easier for the citizens to comply. This will still keep the city looking great and would still meet the intent of the original ordinance. Agenda # Kl MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: December 6, 2004 RE: Change of Manager Intoxicating Liquor License Introduction Amanda Kranz has submitted an application for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to be used at 1700 Rice Street, the Stargate Bar and Dance Club. The owner and current license holder is Michael Tupa but Ms. Kranz has been the general manager for the past four years. Background Ms. Kranz currently resides in Circle Pines and as required by City ordinances, the necessary background investigation was completed by the Police Department on her. The following checks were completed: State and Federal criminal history check, State motor vehicle and driver's license file, State and National Wants and Warrants, and any law enforcement contact with Ramsey, Hennepin, Dakota, Anoka, and Washington Counties. Additionally, the following police departments were also checked: Woodbury, Lino Lakes, Centennial Lakes and St. Paul. Deputy Chief Banick contacted four business references for Ms. Kranz's and they were very complimentary of her and her business dealings with them. There was nothing found that would prohibit her from holding a liquor license in the City of Maplewood. Ms. Kranz has been given a copy of the City Code of Ordinances that apply to being an intoxicating liquor license holder and has met with Chief Thomalla personally to discuss measures to eliminate the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime related issues. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the on-sale liquor license for Ms. Kranz. Agenda # K2 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Karen Guilfoile, City Clerk DATE: December 6, 2004 RE: Owner/Manager Intoxicating Liquor License Introduction Chad Sprinkel has submitted an application for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license to be used at 1900 E. County Road (formerly Ciatti's). The new business will be Broadway Bar & Pizza. Background Mr. Sprinkel currently resides in Rogers, Minnesota. He was born in Highland Park, Illinois and moved to the metro area when he was young. He has lived in Wayzata, Plymouth and Maple Grove before moving to Rogers. As required by City ordinances, the necessary background investigation was completed by the Police Department on Mr. Sprinkel. The following checks were completed: State and Federal criminal history check, State motor vehicle and driver's license file, State and National Wants and Warrants, and any law enforcement contact with Ramsey and Hennepin Counties. Additionally, the following police departments were also checked: Rogers, Maple Grove, Plymouth and Wayzata. Mr. Sprinkel has been given a copy of the City Code of Ordinances that apply to being an intoxicating liquor license holder and has met with Chief Thomalla personally to discuss measures to eliminate the sale of alcohol to underage persons, general security and retail crime related issues. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the on-sale liquor license for Mr. Sprinkel. AGENDA ITEM K-3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer Melinda Coleman, Assistant City Manager and Director of Community Development Bruce Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Gladstone Redevelopment Improvements, City Project 04-21 1. Approve Contract -Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. for Master Planning Services 2. Approve Agreements with Kimley-Horn and Assoc., Inc. and SEH, Inc for Engineering Services 3. Authorize Project Funding 4. Authorize Preparation of Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) 5. Authorize Preparation of Master Framework Plan DATE: November 15, 2004 Introduction On November 8, 2004, the City Council authorized City staff to begin review of master planning consultants for the Gladstone Redevelopment initiative. The staff interviewed three firms and is prepared to make a recommendation of a team to serve as Master Planners and Engineers for the Planning Phase of this initiative. Approval of five motions for the project is recommended. Background The staff interviewed three consultant teams as possible Master Planners for this initiative. The teams were a joint proposal from SEH, Inc. and Kimley-Horn for both planning and engineering services; Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. and SRF Planning and Engineering Services. The Hoisington Koegler proposal included a plan for engineering services from Kimley-Horn and SEH. Interviews and proposals were conducted and reviewed. Any of the three teams would provide good services for the project and have strong backgrounds in successful redevelopment projects in other communities. The Hoisington team is being recommended due to their understanding of the need for public participation, along with their ability to provide an educational component of the financial nature of redevelopment initiatives. The benefit of the Hoisington proposal also includes a combination of the Kimley-Horn and SEH team to provide the engineering perspective. Staff believes that the combined planning and engineering approach is critical. We believe that each alternative must be feasible from a traffic and environmental standpoint or it should not be provided for discussion as part of the development of a final plan. A full work plan from the recommended consultant team of Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc.; Kimley- Horn and Assoc., Inc. and SEH, Inc. is attached and will be the basis for developing the final alternatives for this project. The plan calls for an extensive meeting and review process over the next nine months. The plan is divided into six specific tasks with various deliverables at the conclusion of each task. The total cost of the services for this project is $271,000 and is divided among four firms. The project lead will be supplied by Hoisington, with Brad Scheib as the lead project administrator, at a fee not to exceed $110,000. The engineering services will be led by Jon Horn from Kimley-Horn and their fee will be capped at $87,000. Support services from SEH, Inc. for traffic and storm water analysis is $59,000 and Braun Intertec, Inc. for soil exploration services is $15,000. A financing plan for the project is included with this report. City Council Agenda Background Gladstone Consultant Selection December 13, 2004 Page Two Task Force Selection Included within the proposal is the establishment of a Project Task Force. Consideration of the Task Force is important to the success of the project initiatives. It is critical to the success of the project timeline that the membership of the Task Force be established within the next 2-3 weeks. It is recommended that the City Council designate one of the Councilmembers to serve on the Task Force. The Task Force will be limited to 15-20 members, including one Councilmember, one Planning Commissioner, two representatives from the Park Commission/Open Space Committee and one member from the Community Design Review Board. Melinda and Bruce will work with the commission/committee chairs to designate those representatives. Additional membership will consist of 4-6 business owners, 3-4 neighborhood representatives and 2-4 at large participants. We recommend that the Task Force be established by the City Council and that final membership be determined by the staff management team after recommendations from the Council. It is suggested that Councilmembers direct any suggestions for members on the Task Force to Melinda Coleman. Melinda will assemble the recommended members along with business/property owners and residents from the area that have expressed interest in serving on the Task Force. The intent of the Task Force is not to limit participation, but to make sure that all interest groups are represented. Melinda will assemble the names of the members and inform the Council of the Task Force membership at the January 10th Council meeting. Budget and Financial Considerations The project fee is proposed at $271,000 with a breakdown of costs as follows: • Environmental Assessment (AUAR) $ 98,000 • Master Framework Plan $109,000 • Public Utilities 64 000 TOTAL BUDGET $271,000 It is proposed that the following sources of funds be designated to pay these costs: • Housing and Redevelopment Fund $207,000 • Street Light Utility Funds /Bonds $ 64,000 TOTAL FINANCING PROVIDED $271,000 The justification and explanation for each financing source is as follows: Housing and Redevelopment Fund: It is proposed that $207,000 be used from this fund to pay the Master Planning Services of the project. A sale of the property at Larpenteur-Adolphus is anticipated to provide $400,000 for this fund in January 2005. This fund was established for the purpose of redevelopment within the community. The establishment of this Master Framework Plan is not specific to any properties or areas within the city and likely not a cost to be recovered during the redevelopment process. Similarity, the AUAR will be a general redevelopment cost for the area. Consideration will be given for recovering some of these costs through various sources as future funds are developed in the area. The intent would be to replenish the Housing Fund as the project proceeds over the next couple of years. The Housing and Redevelopment Fund seems most appropriate for this cost. Street Light Utility Funds: It is proposed that $64,000 be recovered from the Street Light Utility. A majority of these expenses are for the investigation into the feasibility of burying the power lines in the project area. It may be necessary to bond for this expense, which will be determined as part of the project investigation. A fee increase will be needed for this expense. Tax Increment Funds: It is proposed that a tax increment district be considered as part of this initiative. We do not propose that any expense be reimbursed at this time. As properties City Council Agenda Background Gladstone Consultant Selection December 13, 2004 Page Three Budget and Financial Considerations (continued) increase in value later in 2005 or early in 2006, we anticipate that Tax Increment Funds will be used for project and infrastructure expenses. It is not proposed to use Tax Increment Funds at this time. The implementation of the project will require services with the following firms: • Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. $110,000 • Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. $ 87,000 • SEH, Inc. $ 59,000 • Braun Intertec, Inc. $ 15,000 TOTAL EXPENSES $271,000 AUAR and Master Framework Plan Process and Schedule The proposed schedule included within the Master Planner's scope of work includes the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) and a Master Framework Plan as deliverable documents during the summer of 2005. The AUAR will be prepared in lieu of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The AUAR is a more extensive version of the EAW process and has been determined as necessary due to the extensive number of parcels that may be impacted by the redevelopment initiatives. The AUAR will provide the City with a guide to the development process and ensure that proper environmental procedures are followed to protect the roadways, stormwater and other environmental features of the area. The AUAR will provide a mitigation plan for the redevelopment initiatives that the City will be required to implement as part of the infrastructure improvements. The AUAR also will extend the moratorium in the area until the final document is adopted. This is expected in August 2005. The Master Framework Plan will be the guide document for the area. Various alternatives and improvements will be explored and considered. The Master Framework plan will be used by property owners and the city to facilitate a plan that includes financial incentives (if appropriate) along with guides on building materials, infrastructure improvements, landscaping investments and other public and private improvements that will provide for the future of the Gladstone area. It is anticipated that the Master Framework Plan will be adopted by the City Council after recommendation from the Task Force in August or September of 2005. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve 5 separate motions for the Gladstone Redevelopment Project, City Project 04-21 as follows: • Approve the contract with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. in the amount of $110,000 for Master Planning Services. • Approve agreements with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $87,000; SEH, Inc. in the amount of $59,000; and Braun Intertec, Inc. in the amount of $15,000 for engineering services and authorize the City Engineer to execute work orders consistent with the current master services agreements. City Council Agenda Background Gladstone Consultant Selection December 13, 2004 Page Four RECOMMENDATION (continued) • Approve a financing plan of $109,000 from the Housing and Redevelopment Fund, $98,000 from tax abatement funds, and $64,000 from the Street Light Utility Fund and direct the finance director to make the appropriate transfers and arrangements for the project funding. Approve the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) under the direction of the City Engineer consistent with Minnesota Statute regulations. Direct the City Engineer and Assistant City Manager to prepare the proper resolutions and authorizations to continue the development moratorium consistent with preparation of the AUAR until September 15, 2005 or earlier if the AUAR is adopted at such earlier date. • Approve the preparation of the Master Framework Plan under the direction of the Assistant City Manager. • Approve the establishment of a 15-20 member Gladstone Area Redevelopment Task Force and authorize the Assistant City Manager to receive names of individuals interested in serving on said Task Force. The Assistant City Manager is directed to report to the City Council at the January 10, 2004 meeting on her recommendation of the members of the Task Force. Designate Council Member designated representative to the Task Force. RCA to serve as the Council's Attachment: Hoisington Koegler Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Contract with Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 Objectives The Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) approach to the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan seeks to achieve several important objectives: Build from previous work This process does not begin from "square one." The City and the Neighborhood have already invested time and money into planning for the redevelopment of this area. These efforts have not reached a conclusion. The continuation of a new process must begin where the previous process ended. We will seek an understanding of what worked, what was unacceptable and what remained unresolved. Create a participatory process that builds a successful plan Meaningful participation in redevelopment planning is a commitment not a commodity. It is not a canned routine applied in the same manner to every project. It is not merely hoops to jump through to get to the end of the process. For HKGi, participation in the planning process means: • Making key stakeholders a part of the process. • Engaging people with divergent views in a meaningful and respectful way. • Building and leading an effective team of staff and other consultants to address the myriad of technical challenges that exist in the Gladstone Neighborhood. • Creating a forum for the exchange of ideas. • Helping people learn about the intricacies of redevelopment. • Reaching a consensus and commitment among the stakeholders to act. • Ensuring that the plan matches the vision for the Gladstone neighborhood and the Maplewood community. A successful redevelopment plan grows out of a planning process based on these principles. Make an effective plan More than any other type of planning, redevelopment must have solutions. Redevelopment planning occurs in places where buildings and uses have become out of date. In these settings, illustrations of design concepts for new development offer an exciting contrast to what exists today. These concepts will not magically happen simply because they are set forth in a plan. Redevelopment requires public and private investments. An effective plan guides the City in making best use of limited public funds to attract and sustain private investment that is consistent with the plan. HKGi s experience with redevelopment projects shows that an effective plan includes: • A vision for the future of the Gladstone neighborhood - an articulation of the qualities and characteristics the community seeks in promoting the redevelopment of the neighborhood. • Clear local objectives for uses and character with flexibility for private investment to create viable and sustainable development. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 1 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope o f Work -Draft 6 December 2004 • A "manual" for undertaking all aspects of the plan to remove uncertainty. • Guidance on how to make the best use of limited public resources. Project Team The HKGi approach to the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan involves a seasoned team of professional consultants with the necessary disciplines to complete the project. This team includes the following firms and consultants: Prime Consultant: Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) Lead Master Planning, Strategic Planning, Landscape Architecture, Urban Design and Implementation Sub-consultants to HKGi: 106 Group Archeological/Cultural/Historical investigation In addition to those firms above, the following firms/consultants are retained by the City of Maplewood through separate contract and will be instrumental in completing this project. Kimley-Horn and Associates (KHA) Project Civil Engineers (utilities, street reconstruction, civil, traffic and transportation) Braun Intertec Geotechnical investigations and analysis Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) Project Engineers (miscellaneous civil and environmental analysis) Rich McLaughlin Urban Designer Project Management Administration of the project will be conducted primarily by Brad Scheib with HKGi and Jon Horn from KHA. All work will be directed by the project managers with approvals gained through City Staff or City Council direction. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 2 Maplewood, Minnesota Work Program for Maplewood Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 The following work program draws on HKGi's experience in redevelopment and on our understanding of the unique situation of the Gladstone Neighborhood. This scope is supplemented with the experiences of KHA and their work on recent engineering projects in Maplewood. Task 1 Assess what has been done This task focuses on the investigations needed to achieve our objective of building from previous work. We will begin the process by developing a clear and comprehensive understanding of the current setting and previous planning. This understanding will grow from both data and from perceptions. This task will also be used to organize the planning process. To ensure a successful start for the Gladstone Neighborhood planning process, HKGi will: L 1 Conduct a "kick off' meetin~(Staff meeting #1~. The project will be a collaborative effort of HKGi, City Staff and other consulting partners including Kimley-Horn and Associates, Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. and Rich McLaughlin. This project must begin with these parties at the table. The meeting will be used to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each party in this process and to set a detailed meeting calendar. 1.2 Collect and analyze existing data. The HKGi team seeks to build on the existing base of knowledge. We want to establish a strong working knowledge of Maplewood, the Gladstone Neighborhood and prior planning. A key step in making effective use of the project budget is avoiding duplication of information. The work program assumes that background information will be collected and provided to the consulting team by City Staff. Among the data sources desired by the consulting team are: • Current comprehensive plan and infrastructure system plans. • McLaughlin design plan and related background information. • Redevelopment plans created by the neighborhood with any supporting information. • Preliminary designs for street and streetscape improvements, including timetable and finance plan (if available). • Maxfield 2003 market research. • Development regulations affecting Gladstone Neighborhood. • Policies on economic development, business subsidies, public improvements and special assessments. • Phase I or Phase II environmental assessments for any area within or adjacent to the project. Task L 2 will also include a critique of the McLaughlin Plan from a real estate market and an urban design/site context perspective. HKGi will invite a select number of developers experienced in first ring suburbs to evaluate and comment on the marketability and the urban design appropriateness of the McLaughlin Plan. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 3 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 1.3 Create neighborhood profile. A profile of the Gladstone Neighborhood helps our team grow in its understanding of the area. It also creates tools to be used throughout the planning process. Redevelopment planning relies on mapping to illustrate current conditions and future scenarios. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) parcel data helps us gain an initial understanding of the Neighborhood. The City will provide the consultant team with electronic mapping files, GIS parcel data, contour data, any existing topology and current aerial photography. Information about the Neighborhood will also be collected on site and where possible cataloged in the GIS database. Our team will walk the area to gain afirst-hand understanding of existing land uses and relationships. In this task, we will: • Create base maps depicting key elements of the physical setting including parcel configuration, building outline and location, streets, sidewalks, parks/open space, and trails and existing infrastructure systems including public and private utility systems and their associated characteristics. • Investigate the feasibility of the burial of existing overhead utilities (telephone, electric and cable TV) within the redevelopment area. This will include discussions with the various private utility companies and the identification of existing overhead utilities that may be candidates for burial as a part of the redevelopment plan. • Complete an assessment of water resources issues and opportunities in the redevelopment area and develop a preliminary storm water routing plan. • Gather existing traffic studies, traffic counts, and background information for the redevelopment area. Initiate discussions with Ramsey County regarding the proposed redevelopment plan and gather their initial comments on the plan and its impact on existing County roadways in the area. • Gather existing subsurface information for the project area and identify additional geotechnical exploration requirements. Initiate a geotechnical exploration program to gather additional subsurface information as needed to help determine the viability of proposed public and private investments in the area. • Prepare inventory of the natural features of the Savanna. • Build GIS database including current land use, parcel size, building size, building age, property valuation, and infrastructure deficiencies. • Create a community demographic and economic profile using 2000 Census data. • Prepare photo inventory of all parcels, structures, infrastructure and public spaces in the Neighborhood. 1.4 Inform the community. HKGi will take several steps to inform the general populations of the Neighborhood and the community from the outset of the planning process. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 4 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 • Prepare general news release. HKGi will prepare and distribute a news release that provides an overview of the planning process and an announcement of Public Meeting # 1. At a minimum, the news release will be sent to the Pioneer Press, the Star Tribune, Real Estate Journal, and Business Journal. In addition to reaching the general population of Maplewood, this news release alerts potential developers about a pending redevelopment project. • Prepare and distribute newsletter #1. We propose using a periodic newsletter specifically to inform the Neighborhood and the community about findings and upcoming events in the planning process. The newsletter would be mailed to residents and businesses in the Gladstone neighborhood and posted for general distribution on the City's website. • Explore cable television alternatives. 1.5 Conduct Staff meeting #2. The likely agenda for this meeting will include: • Present and review the Neighborhood Profile to obtain staff feedback prior to using this information in the planning process. • Reach agreement on the final content and plans for distribution of Newsletter # 1. The initial issue will introduce the project and invite people to the first public meeting. • Finalize plans for upcoming Park and Recreation Commission, Task Force and public meetings. 1.6 Conduct workshop with Park and Recreation Commission. The HKGi approach uses a dual path process to plan for the Savanna area. HKGi will work with Staff and the Park and Recreation Commission to focus on specific issues and opportunities for this important element of Maplewood's park system. It is essential, however, that the Savanna is an integral part of plans for redevelopment in the Neighborhood. The initial meeting with the Commission will be used to introduce the planning process, review the results of the Neighborhood Profile (including the Savanna) and learn about Commission objectives for the process. 1.7 Establish Gladstone Redevelopment Task Force and Conduct Task Force Meeting #1. This Task Force will serve as the steering committee for the planning process. The group will be made up of key public and private stakeholders. It should include both supporters and skeptics. As part of this task, we will: • Prepare a "project manual" for use by staff and Task Force members. The project manual serves as an ongoing reference document including contact information for the consulting team, work program, project schedule, and communications suggestions. • Conduct Task Force meeting # 1. The agenda for this meeting would include setting roles and expectations, a review of the planning process, evaluation of the McLaughlin plan, and exploration of elements for the vision and guiding principles. Task Force meeting #1 will also include a tour of recent redevelopment projects within the Twin Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 5 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 Cities Metro area that may offer insights and "lessons learned." It is likely that this meeting will need to occur on a Saturday in order to accommodate schedules. 1.8 Design and conduct Public Workshop # 1. This meeting will be used by HKGi to inform and to learn. We will inform the community about the redevelopment planning process - the steps, the objectives and means of public participation. We will learn from the participants through a series of small group discussion exercises designed specifically for this meeting. The issues to be explored through the group discussions may include an evaluation of existing concept plans including the Gladstone Coalition, the McLaughlin plan, developer concepts and elements of a vision for the future of the Gladstone Neighborhood. We suggest that the presentation portions of these meetings be video taped for use on cable television. Using cable TV to replay the presentation makes accurate information about the project available to a larger part of the community. 1.9 Conduct stakeholder interviews. These one-on-one sessions provide the opportunity for key parties to provide information and guidance to HKGi. These parties may include certain property owners, business owners, interested developers or special interest groups. City staff will assist HKGi in identifying an appropriate list for these interviews not to exceed eight (8) interviews. 1.10 Draft vision and guidin~princi~les. HKGi will prepare a draft statement of vision and guiding principles for the redevelopment of the Gladstone Neighborhood. The vision and guiding principles become a means of articulating and reaching consensus on the desired outcomes of redevelopment. Task 1 Deliverables: • Project manual • Neighborhood Profile including an assessment of current park facilities and the Savanna • News release • Newsletter # 1 • Summary of Public Meeting • Summary of interviews • Draft vision and guiding principles • Agendas for meetings Task 1 Meetings: • Kick off meeting with Staff. • Staff Meeting #2 • Park/Recreation Commission Meeting #1 • Task Force Meeting # 1 • Public Meeting # 1 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 6 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope o f Work -Draft 6 December 2004 Task 2 Refine approaches and explore alternatives With the foundation of understanding gained in the previous tasks, our team will begin to develop a series of multi-level concepts for the Neighborhood. Concept development will begin with the "big picture" looking at land use, densities and elements of the public realm including: pedestrian linkages, use of the Savanna, other parks and public spaces, street character, streetscape, utility systems, transit connections, parking and circulation. This level of conceptual thinking will examine broad scale opportunities and will illustrate variations of the long-term vision for the Gladstone Neighborhood. It will also provide the basis for the second stage of the exploration of alternative concept development. The second stage of concept exploration will focus on "private sector" investments including building form and character, materials and context appropriateness. Concepts will identify preferred locations for specific land uses. They will clearly illustrate the way in which redevelopment relates to the existing uses and the possible redevelopment of key properties. Collectively, the big picture and private sector alternatives that will be explored will address a broad array of planning concepts for the project area at a master plan level of detail. HKGi will create alternatives for consideration that depict varying approaches to the "big picture" and "private sector" components. Elements of the public realm will then be advanced to a conceptual design level of detail. The exploration of the concepts must address feasibility. From a public perspective, feasibility means actions and investments needed to remove the barriers to redevelopment. Private development issues will include market demand and financial sustainability. 2.1 Conduct Task Force meeting #2. This meeting will be used to update the Task Force on the results of the process to date and to obtain guidance before beginning a further exploration of redevelopment alternatives. The anticipated agenda for the meeting includes: • Review of the results of Public Meeting # 1 • Summary of interview findings • Review/discussion of the draft vision and guiding principles • Consensus on aspects of previous plans to explore alternatives 2.2 Conduct in-house charrette. HKGi will host a planning and design charrette that will include various disciplines within HKGi, representatives from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Rich McLaughlin and City Staff. The charrette will be organized around the evaluation of the McLaughlin Plan and generating alternative redevelopment plan concepts addressing such elements as land use patterns, building forms, open space systems, park programming, pedestrian connections, infrastructure systems, vehicle circulation and Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 7 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 urban design. We anticipate the charrette to be conducted over the better part of a full day. The charrette will be conducted at the offices of HKGi. 2.3 Conduct Staff meeting #3. This meeting will be used to review the refined results of the charrette and to discuss development alternatives. 2.4 Prepare development alternatives. The charrette leads to the creation of a series of (2-4) alternatives for redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood. The alternatives will include identification of key land use patterns, a general orientation of building footprints and a summary of development units, and a characterization of public realm improvements (streetscape such as lighting, plantings and signage) at master plan level of detail. The alternatives will also integrate park concepts for the Gladstone Savanna. 2.5 Explore feasibility. In reality, the exploration of feasibility has been a part of the planning process since the beginning. Our team has looked for opportunities and barriers that affect the ability to implement the plan. This task focuses on the specific implications for the identified development alternatives. As part of this task, we will: • Identify potential public actions and investments; • Identify infrastructure needs (sanitary sewer, storm drainage, public water and private utility needs); • Identify scope of private utility burial work; • Identify transportation needs (roadways, intersection improvements, transit); • Create redevelopment "proforma" and assess financial "gap" for redevelopment projects at key locations; and • Determine appropriate funding tools available for the plan. 2.6 Conduct Staff meeting #4. This meeting will be used to review proposed development alternatives and the results of the preliminary feasibility assessment. This meeting lays the foundation for upcoming reviews by the Task Force and Park and Recreation Commission. 2.7 Conduct Task Force meeting #3. This meeting will be designed to present and gain feedback on the alternative redevelopment concepts. We will use this meeting to focus on the relationship between redevelopment concepts and implementation. It is important that the Task Force members understand the nature of public and private actions required to undertake these concepts. This meeting will also be used to establish plans for the second public meeting. 2.8 Conduct Park and Recreation Commission workshop #2. We will meet with the Commission to review concepts for the Savanna area in context with the overall Neighborhood. 2.9 Prepare concept modifications. The guidance received from the Task Force and the Park and Recreation Commission will be used to make modifications to the alternatives. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 8 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 2.10 Prepare newsletter #2. The concepts will be distilled into a newsletter (not more than four pages) for mailing and Internet publication. This newsletter will contain information about the public meeting. 2.11 Conduct Public workshop #2. HKGi will design the format of this meeting to promote meaningful interaction with the public on the redevelopment concepts. The first portion of the meeting will be informational -building on the newsletter and providing the participants with information needed to comment on the concepts. HKGi will conduct group discussion exercises designed specifically for this meeting. 2.12 Conduct Staff meeting #5. This meeting will be used to review results of recent meetings (Task Force, Park and Recreation Commission and Public), to discuss upcoming meetings in Task 3, and to consider elements of the preferred alternative. Task 2 Deliverables: • Alternative development concepts in graphic form and textual description including master plan concepts for the Savanna • Technical memorandum on initial feasibility assessment • Technical memorandum detailing required infrastructure needs • Newsletter #2 • Summary of Public Workshop #2 • Agendas for meetings Task 2 Meetings: • Charrette • Staff Meetings 3-5 • Park/Recreation Commission Workshop #2 • Task Force Meetings 2-3 • Public Workshop #2 Task 3 -Reach consensus on preferred alternative The guidance received from the Task Force and the public leads to the creation of a preferred concept for redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood. In this task, HKGi will continue to refine land use, design and implementation details of redevelopment. Throughout task 3, HKGi and the engineering consultants will be formulating a preferred plan in graphic and written format. This will be an evolving plan in draft form that will be confirmed at the end of task 3 and compiled in full report form during Task 5. 3.1 Conduct developer review. HKGi will convene a process to obtain input on the alternatives for redevelopment from successful developers of urban infill or redevelopment projects. The process will involve a series of one-on-one discussions with developers that have experience in similar settings. We have found that this step provides valuable "real Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 9 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 world" input and results in important adjustments to the concepts. HKGi will also use these meetings to test ideas and alternatives for soliciting development proposals. 3.2 Conduct Task Force meeting #4. This meeting will be used to report on the results of Public Meeting #2 and the developer reviews and to reach consensus on the elements of a preferred concept for redevelopment in the Gladstone neighborhood. 3.3 Conduct Park and Recreation Commission workshop #3. This meeting seeks to establish the Commission's preferred scenario for the Savanna as input to the Task Force consideration of the overall redevelopment of the Neighborhood. 3.4 Conduct Staff meeting #6. This meeting will be used to review information collected from the developer reviews, to discuss preparations for the next Park and Recreation Commission and Task Force meetings, and to consider approaches for the environmental review process. 3.5 Prepare Newsletter #3. HKGi will prepare a newsletter that introduces the preferred alternative and announces the next public workshop. 3.6 Conduct Public workshop #3. This workshop will be designed to receive guidance from the community before the process moves from concept to plan preparation. 3.7 Conduct City Council update workshop. This will be a workshop (potentially a joint workshop with other advisory boards) with the City Council to provide an update on the project. Task 3 Deliverables: • Modified development concepts • Modified infrastructure needs memorandum Task 3 Meetings: • Developer reviews • Staff Meeting #6 • Park and Recreation Commission • Summary of developer reviews • Newsletter #3 • Agendas for meetings Task 4 -Establish implementation manual Workshop #3 • Task Force Meeting #4 • Public Workshop #3 • City Council Update Workshop Previous tasks have identified various implementation tools. Like most redevelopment projects, the Gladstone Neighborhood will not transform overnight, but rather will change gradually over a matter of years. This task will focus on establishing a manual that will guide the short and long term phasing of implementation of the "big picture" elements and the "private realm." It is likely that actual redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood will trigger the need for an environmental review process. There are several factors that may influence the degree and form of the environmental review including specific uses, density, utility and infrastructure needs, timing of developer or land owner initiatives and/or public petition. State law allows for two forms of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 10 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope o f Work -Draft 6 December 2004 environmental review: environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) or an alternative urban areawide review (ALTAR). Each approach has its own advantages. The EAW is typically focused around one specific project and ends with the determination of whether a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary. The ALTAR is an "alternative" form of review that evaluates the "cumulative" impacts of a number of related projects over a larger area. The ALTAR ends with the development of a Mitigation Plan that must be followed. The ALTAR generally satisfies the environmental review needs for most projects within the area as opposed to doing individual EAWs. Both methods follow the same requirements as stipulated by Minnesota Statutes requiring environmental reviews. The scope of work includes conducting the necessary level of planning and engineering analysis to complete the environmental review via either means. Furthermore, Task 4 will outline the process, timing, preliminary budgets, funding options and priority of the various elements of the plan. It will specifically examine sources and uses of funds for property acquisition and it will define the appropriate roles for both the public and private sectors in implementation. A phasing plan will also be established to identify which public improvements will provide the greatest return in terms of facilitating redevelopment and use of public finances. This task will also include a general indication of the timing of private sector redevelopment parcels. 4.1 Review Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance impacts. It is likely that the plan may require changes to existing policy and zoning regulations. The master plan will determine how design guidelines, zoning, and other municipal regulations can be used to implement the vision for the Gladstone Neighborhood. 4.2 Determine environmental review needs and format. This task will establish a basis for the environmental review (ALTAR or EAW) and will provide a detailed schedule for completion of the process. 4.3 Establish public improvements budget. Capital improvements associated with the public realm (streets, parks, infrastructure) will be developed based off of the master plan and subsequent concept development plans. 4.4 Develop a phasing strategy for public improvements. Public projects will be scheduled on a need basis and the projects ability to meet the goals of the master redevelopment plan. 4.5 Develop a phasing strategy for private redevelopment. To the extent known, a phasing plan will be identified for private redevelopment parcels in conjunction with the public improvements. 4.6 Identify obstacles to successful implementation. Certain obstacles may pose challenges to successful implementation of the plan. Identifying these obstacles upfront better enables decision makers to minimize "hiccups" along the way. Obstacles may include: relocation of infrastructure, funding, assembly of parcels for redevelopment, etc... Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 11 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 4.7 Develop a community outreach mechanism. Once the plan is completed and implementation begins, community outreach and involvement should be maintained. A plan for ensuring ongoing communication between City officials, developers and the Gladstone Neighborhood will be developed. 4.8 Conduct Staff meeting #7. The subject of this meeting with staff will be to review and refine the implementation manual and prepare for meetings in Task 5. Task 4 Deliverables: • A review of needed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments and associated technical memorandum Task 4 Meetings: • Staff Meeting #7 • Schedule for completion of environmental review process • Project budget spreadsheet for public improvements • Phasing strategy for public and private investments including exhibit detailing proposed phasing plan for public infrastructure • Memorandum outlining potential obstacles • Memorandum outlining a community outreach approach • Agenda for meeting Task 5 -Prepare draft redevelopment plan and environmental assessment report The HKGi team will refine the preferred alternative into a draft redevelopment plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood and an environmental assessment report. HKGi will prepare an illustrative document with photographs, sketches, diagrams and supporting narrative to allow people to fully understand what is desired for the Gladstone Neighborhood and an environmental assessment report that satisfies statutory requirements for environmental assessments. It will also provide: • The framework to ensure that reviews of development proposals are substantive and credible. • The information required to make the findings fora "statutory" redevelopment plan. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 12 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope o f Work -Draft 6 December 2004 This is equally true of physical changes that are recommended in the master plan. The plan is likely to reflect anticipated changes in land use; vehicle and pedestrian circulation; the qualities and character of public open spaces; connections to adjacent trail systems; architectural character for new structures; identity elements; and the character and location of special features that help create a new and exciting neighborhood area. Key areas of the master plan may be developed to a greater level of detail to demonstrate how specific areas fit the overall plan. While every detail will not be defined in the redevelopment master plan process, the plan that results will provide a solid direction for subsequent planning and design efforts and it will demonstrate how the vision of the community is articulated through key implementation strategies. The master plan is only a "paper plan" at this point in the process. Actual implementation requires the identification of specific strategic steps that will need to be undertaken to achieve desired results. Building from task 4, our team will work with the City to refine the responsibilities and procedures for implementation of the ideas generated during the redevelopment master planning process. The current environment for city government places greater importance on the implementation elements of redevelopment plans. Implementation must look well beyond the simple listing of action steps. Recent court cases point to the importance of building a strong link between redevelopment plans and public actions. One element of the legal challenge to the Best Buy Project in Richfield was the public purpose in the actions taken by the City. The process will set forth the steps and findings needed to comply with the statutory requirements for a redevelopment plan under the HRA Act. The redevelopment plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood will include (as a minimum) the following outcomes: • Vision and guiding principles. • Land use plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood. • Illustrative master plan depicting design character and patterns for private development, infrastructure, and the public realm. • Concept master plan for the Savanna and any related improvements • Identification of potential redevelopment sites and strategies for undertaking redevelopment. • Recommendations for vehicle and pedestrian circulation in the Neighborhood and the development of a master transportation plan. • Comprehensive manual for implementing the plan. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 13 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 • Technical evaluation of environmental implications (form of ALIAR). (with assistance from engineering consultants) • A master plan for infrastructure systems including storm water, sanitary sewer, public water systems and private utility services. The storm water master plan will identify improvements that are required to meet storm water quality and quantity requirements for the area, and will define both proposed public and private facilities. • Preparation of a feasibility report detailing the proposed scope of work, estimated costs, financing plan, and schedule for the burial of existing overhead private utilities. • Compilation of information used in developing the plan. In preparing the draft redevelopment master plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood, the HKGi team will undertake the following tasks: 5.1 Compile complete draft of master plan. We will prepare a draft of the Redevelopment Master Plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood as described above. 5.2 Compile complete draft of environmental assessment report. HKGi in collaboration with KHA and SEH will assemble the various components of the selected environmental review documentation and will begin the public process for environmental reviews. 5.3 Prepare Newsletter #4. HKGi will prepare a newsletter that highlights the draft plan and announces the next public meeting. The newsletter will be finalized after the Staff and Task Force review of the plan . 5.4 Conduct staff review. The draft plan and environmental assessment report will be submitted to staff for review and comment. We will facilitate a working session (Staff Meeting #8) to obtain feedback on the plan. Following staff review of the environmental report, the draft environmental report will be distributed to key agencies for review consistent with processes outlined in State Statutes. 5.5 Conduct Task Force plan review # 1. HKGi will lead the first of two meeting designed to present and receive feedback on the draft plan and environmental assessment report. 5.6 Conduct Board review workshop. This workshop assembles the City Council and all key advisory boards for a plan review meeting. This approach ensures that all parties receive the same overview of the plan and environmental assessment report. It is also beneficial to hear comments on the plan from a wide range of perspectives. 5.7 Conduct Public workshop #4. We will design and conduct a workshop to obtain feedback on the draft plan and environmental assessment report from the community. The format of the workshop will be designed to obtain needed and meaningful input on the draft plan and satisfy statutory requirements of the environmental review process. 5.8 Prepare modifications. We will prepare proposed modifications to the draft plan to reflect feedback received from the previous plan review meetings. 5.9 Conduct staff plan review. This meeting will be to review proposed modifications to the plan and prepare for the final Task Force meeting. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 14 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 5.10 Conduct final Task Force review workshop. The objective of this meeting is to reach agreement on the contents of the final plan and environmental assessment report to be forwarded to the City Council. Task 5 Deliverables: • Draft Redevelopment Master Plan • Completed Draft of the Environmental Assessment Report in the form of an ALIAR or EAW as determined in Task 4. (50 copies provided) • Newsletter #4 • Agendas for meetings Task 5 Meetings: • Developer panel • Staff plan reviews (2) • Task Force plan reviews (2) • Council and Board plan review • Public Workshop #4 Task 6 -Prepare final plan/seek city approval The guidance received in Task 5 will lead to the preparation of a final Redevelopment Master Plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood. This plan will be submitted to the City Council for its consideration and approval. This task also becomes the springboard for actions needed to implement the plan. To conclude the planning process, our team will: 6.1 Prepare final master plan and environmental assessment report. The final master plan and environmental assessment report will be prepared incorporating reviews from task 5 and distributed to the City Council for final review and approval. 6.2 Present plan to City Council for review and approval. A presentation in a public hearing format will be made for the Council to consider the plan and environmental assessment report for adoption. 6.3 Make necessary final revisions to the plan and environmental assessment report. 6.4 Produce the Pinal report in printed and electronic form. One printed hard copy and one CD with reproducible electronic files will be provided to the City. 6.5 Produce executive summary of the plan in the form of the final newsletter. An executive summary will be produced to provide an easy guide for interested businesses, developers or residents. This will be produced in conjunction with production of a final newsletter to end this planning phase of the project. Task 6 Deliverables: • Final Master Plan and Environmental • Executive summary • Final Newsletter Assessment Report- 1 printed and 1 electronic copy. Task 6 Meetings: • Council presentation Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates I S Maplewood, Minnesota Next Steps -Implementation Phase Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 Upon the completion of the final master plan and environmental assessment report, the redevelopment will be ready to move into the implementation phase. A staging/phasing strategy for the implementation of the various public and private improvements in the Gladstone Neighborhood will be developed as a part of Redevelopment Master Plan (see Tasks 4 and 5). It is expected that the initial implementation task will include the preparation of a feasibility report detailing the scope of work, estimated costs, financing plan and schedule for the construction of the first phase of the public infrastructure required to support the proposed redevelopment. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 16 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope o f Work -Draft 6 December 2004 Schedule The following is a tentative schedule for completion of the work scope. This project assumes a kick-off meeting the week of December 13`'' and will require the first Task Force meeting to occur in mid January. The first public workshop would be scheduled for early February. Task Time Line (start date) 1 Assess what has been done December 15 2 Refine approaches and explore alternatives Mld February 3 Reach consensus on a preferred Alternative Aprl 14 4 Establish Implementation Manual May 2 June 6 5 Prepare draft redevelopment plan and (deadline to submit environmental environmental assessment report assessment for EQB publlCatlon Is June 20tH-30 day comment period expires on July 27tH) 6 Prepare Final Plan/Seek Review and approval AUgUSt ~ Potential start of private utility burial September--OCtOber Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 17 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope o fWork -Draft 6 December 2004 Fees The following fee schedule provides a total project budget to complete the tasks identified in the work scope and an allocation as to fees for HKGi led work and KHA led work. Task Desa-iption HKO * KHAN` Total Budget 1 Build the foundation $ 16,700 $ 35,000 $ 51,700 2 Refine approaches and explore alternatives $ 27,300 $ 28,000 $ 55,300 3 Reach consensus on preferred alternative $ 11,200 $ 5,000 $ 16,200 4 Establish Implementation Manual $ 7,600 $ 20,000 $ 27,600 5 Prepare draft plan and environmental assessment report $ 32,400 $ 57,000 $ 89,400 6 Prepare final plan/Seek approval $ 10,000 $ 6,000 $ 16,000 Expenses $ 4,800 $ 10,000 $ 14,800 Totals $ 110,000 $ 161,000 $ 271,000 * Includes fees for 106 Group to conduct Cultural/Historical Resource Assessment ** Includes fee estimate for S E H (civil engineering) and Braun Intertech (Geotechnical Services) These fees can also be categorized for work associated with the three primary components of the project including the environmental assessment report, the master plan and the public utilities. The fees are allocated in this manner as follows: Environmental Assessment Reporting ~ Master Plan $ Public Utilities $ Total Project Budget g Total Fee HKGi Fees KHA Fees Breakdown 50,000 $ 48,000 $ 98,000 56,000 $ 53,000 $ 109,000 4, 000 $ 60, 000 $ 64, 000 110,000 $ 161,000 $ 271,000 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 18 December 7, 2004 Mr. Chuck Ahl Public Works Director City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B East Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Contract for professional planning services related to Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Planning Dear Mr. Ahl: This letter outlines a Scope of Services, Fee Schedule and other elements which together constitute an agreement between the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as the CLIENT, and Hoisington Koegler Group Inc., hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT, for professional planning services for Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Planning, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT. The CLIENT and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: A. BASIC SERVICES The CONSULTANT'S basic services for the PROJECT are in reference to the Master Scope of Services included as Attachment B. Attachment B provides a master scope of services that incorporates work to be coordinated with Kimley-Horn and Associates (KHA) through the CLIENT. Attachment C is the contract for services between Kimley-Horn and Associates and the CLIENT, City of Maplewood. The following represents the CONSULTANTS contractual responsibilities in reference to Attachment B. Task 1 -Assess what has been done 1.1 Conduct a "kick off' meeting (Staff meeting #1). The project will be a collaborative effort of HKGi, City Staff and other consulting partners including Kimley-Horn and Associates, Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. and Rich McLaughlin. The meeting will be used to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each party in this process and to set a detailed meeting calendar. 1.2 Collect and analyze existing data. The work program assumes that background information will be collected and provided to the consulting team by City Staff. Among the data sources desired by the consulting team are: • Current comprehensive plan and infrastructure system plans. • McLaughlin design plan and related background information. • Redevelopment plans created by the neighborhood with any supporting information. • Preliminary designs for street and streetscape improvements, including timetable and finance plan (if available). Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Paget • Maxfield 2003 market research. • Development regulations affecting Gladstone Neighborhood. • Policies on economic development, business subsidies, public improvements and special assessments. • Phase I or Phase II environmental assessments for any area within or adjacent to the project. Task 1.2 will also include a critique of the McLaughlin Plan from a real estate market and an urban design/site context perspective. HKGi will invite a select number of developers experienced in first ring suburbs to evaluate and comment on the marketability and the urban design appropriateness of the McLaughlin Plan. 1.3 Create neighborhood profile. The City will provide the consultant team with electronic base mapping files; GIS parcel data, contour data, any existing topology and current aerial photography. Information about the Neighborhood will also be collected on site and where possible cataloged in the GIS database. Our team will walk the area to gain a first-hand understanding of existing land uses and relationships. In this task, we will: • Create base maps depicting key elements of the physical setting including parcel configuration, building outline and location, streets, sidewalks, parks/open space, and trails and their associated characteristics. • Prepare inventory of the natural features of the Savanna. • Build GIS database including current land use, parcel size, building size, building age, property valuation, and infrastructure deficiencies. • Create a community demographic and economic profile using 2000 Census data. • Prepare photo inventory of all parcels, structures, infrastructure and public spaces in the Neighborhood. 1.4 Inform the community. HKGi will take several steps to inform the general populations of the Neighborhood and the community from the outset of the planning process. • Prepare general news release. HKGi will prepare and distribute a news release that provides an overview of the planning process and an announcement of Public Meeting # 1. At a minimum, the news release will be sent to the Pioneer Press, the Star Tribune, Real Estate Journal, and Business Journal. • Prepare and distribute newsletter # 1. We propose using a periodic newsletter specifically to inform the Neighborhood and the community about findings and upcoming events in the planning process. The newsletter would be mailed to residents and businesses in the Gladstone neighborhood and posted for general distribution on the City's website. • Explore cable television alternatives 1.5 Conduct Staff meeting #2. The likely agenda for this meeting will include: • Present and review the Neighborhood Profile to obtain staff feedback prior to using this information in the planning process. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page3 • Reach agreement on the final content and plans for distribution of Newsletter # 1. The initial issue will introduce the project and invite people to the first public meeting. • Finalize plans for upcoming Park and Recreation Commission, Task Force and public meetings. 1.6 Conduct workshop with Park and Recreation Commission. HKGi will work with Staff and the Park and Recreation Commission to focus on specific issues and opportunities for this important element of Maplewood's park system. The initial meeting with the Commission will be used to introduce the planning process, review the results of the Neighborhood Profile (including the Savanna) and learn about Commission objectives for the process. 1.7 Establish Gladstone Redevelopment Task Force and Conduct Task Force Meeting # 1. As part of this task, we will: • Prepare a "project manual" for use by staff and Task Force members. • Conduct Task Force meeting # 1. The agenda for this meeting would include setting roles and expectations, a review of the planning process, evaluation of the McLaughlin plan, and exploration of elements for the vision and guiding principles. Task Force meeting #1 will also include a tour of recent redevelopment projects within the Twin Cities Metro area that may offer insights and "lessons learned." It is likely that this meeting will need to occur on a Saturday in order to accommodate schedules. 1.8 Design and conduct Public Workshop # 1. HKGi will facilitate a public workshop to orient the community to the project and obtain initial insights into the project. 1.9 Conduct stakeholder interviews. These one-on-one sessions provide the opportunity for key parties to provide information and guidance to HKGi. City staff will assist HKGi in identifying an appropriate list for these interviews not to exceed eight (8) interviews. 1.10 Draft vision and guiding principles. HKGi will prepare a draft statement of vision and guiding principles for the redevelopment of the Gladstone Neighborhood. Task 1 Deliverables: • Project manual • Neighborhood Profile including an assessment of current park facilities and the Savanna • News release • Newsletter # 1 • Agendas for meetings Task 1 Meetings: • Kick off meeting with Staff. • Staff Meeting #2 • Park/Recreation Commission Meeting #1 • Summary of Public Meeting • Summary of interviews • Draft vision and guiding principles • Task Force Meeting # 1 • Public Meeting # 1 Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page 4 Task 2 -Refine approaches and explore alternatives 2.1 Conduct Task Force meeting #2. This meeting will be used to update the Task Force on the results of the process to date and to obtain guidance before beginning a further exploration of redevelopment alternatives. The anticipated agenda for the meeting includes: • Review of the results of Public Meeting # 1 • Summary of interview findings • Review/discussion of the draft vision and guiding principles • Consensus on aspects of previous plans to explore alternatives 2.2 Conduct in-house charrette. HKGi will host a planning and design charrette that will include various disciplines within HKGi, representatives from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Rich McLaughlin and City Staff. The charrette will be conducted at the offices of HKGi. 2.3 Conduct Staff meeting #3. This meeting will be used to review the refined results of the charrette and to discuss development alternatives. 2.4 Prepare development alternatives. The charrette leads to the creation of a series of (2-4) alternatives for redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood. The alternatives will include identification of key land use patterns, a general orientation of building footprints and a summary of development units, and a characterization of public realm improvements (streetscape such as lighting, plantings and signage) at master plan level of detail. The alternatives will also integrate park concepts for the Gladstone Savanna. 2.5 Explore feasibility. In reality, the exploration of feasibility has been a part of the planning process since the beginning. Our team has looked for opportunities and barriers that affect the ability to implement the plan. This task focuses on the specific implications for the identified development alternatives. As part of this task, we will: • Identify potential public actions and investments; • Create redevelopment "proforma" and assess financial "gap" for redevelopment projects at key locations; and • Determine appropriate funding tools available for the plan. 2.6 Conduct Staff meeting #4. This meeting will be used to review proposed development alternatives and the results of the preliminary feasibility assessment. This meeting lays the foundation for upcoming reviews by the Task Force and Park and Recreation Commission. 2.7 Conduct Task Force meeting #3. This meeting will be designed to present and gain feedback on the alternative redevelopment concepts. We will use this meeting to focus on the relationship between redevelopment concepts and implementation. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Pages 2.8 Conduct Park and Recreation Commission workshop #2. We will meet with the Commission to review concepts for the Savanna area in context with the overall Neighborhood. 2.9 Prepare concept modifications. The guidance received from the Task Force and the Park and Recreation Commission will be used to make modifications to the alternatives. 2.10 Prepare newsletter #2. The concepts will be distilled into a newsletter (not more than four pages) for mailing and Internet publication. 2.11 Conduct Public workshop #2. HKGi will design the format of this meeting to promote meaningful interaction with the public on the redevelopment concepts. The first portion of the meeting will be informational -building on the newsletter and providing the participants with information needed to comment on the concepts. HKGi will conduct group discussion exercises designed specifically for this meeting. 2.12 Conduct Staff meeting #5. This meeting will be used to review results of recent meetings (Task Force, Park and Recreation Commission and Public), to discuss upcoming meetings in Task 3, and to consider elements of the preferred alternative. Task 2 Deliverables: • Alternative development concepts in graphic form and textual description including master plan concepts for the Savanna Task 2 Meetings: • Charrette • Staff Meetings 3-5 • Park/Recreation Commission Workshop #2 • Technical memorandum on initial feasibility assessment • Technical memorandum detailing required infrastructure needs • Newsletter #2 • Summary of Public Workshop #2 • Agendas for meetings • Task Force Meetings 2-3 • Public Workshop #2 Task 3 -Reach consensus on preferred alternative 3.1 Conduct developer review. HKGi will convene a process to obtain input on the alternatives for redevelopment from successful developers of urban infill or redevelopment projects. The process will involve a series of one-on-one discussions with developers that have experience in similar settings. 3.2 Conduct Task Force meeting #4. This meeting will be used to report on the results of Public Meeting #2 and the developer reviews and to reach consensus on the elements of a preferred concept for redevelopment in the Gladstone neighborhood. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page 6 3.3 Conduct Park and Recreation Commission workshop #3. This meeting seeks to establish the Commission's preferred scenario for the Savanna as input to the Task Force consideration of the overall redevelopment of the Neighborhood. 3.4 Conduct Staff meeting #6. This meeting will be used to review information collected from the developer reviews, to discuss preparations for the next Park and Recreation Commission and Task Force meetings, and to consider approaches for the environmental review process. 3.5 Prepare Newsletter #3. HKGi will prepare a newsletter that introduces the preferred alternative and announces the next public workshop. 3.6 Conduct Public workshop #3. This workshop will be designed to receive guidance from the community before the process moves from concept to plan preparation. 3.7 Conduct City Council update workshop. This will be a workshop (potentially a joint workshop with other advisory boards) with the City Council to provide an update on the project. Task 3 Deliverables: Task 3 Meetings: • Modified development concepts • Modified infrastructure memorandum • Summary of developer reviews • Newsletter #3 • Agendas for meetings • Developer reviews needs Staff Meeting #6 • Park and Recreation Commission Workshop #3 • Task Force Meeting #4 • Public Workshop #3 • City Council Update Workshop Task 4 -Establish implementation manual 4.1 Review Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance impacts. It is likely that the plan may require changes to existing policy and zoning regulations. The master plan will determine how design guidelines, zoning, and other municipal regulations can be used to implement the vision for the Gladstone Neighborhood. 4.2 Determine environmental review needs and format. This task will establish a basis for the environmental review (AUAR or EAW) and will provide a detailed schedule for completion of the process. 4.3 Establish public improvements budget. Capital improvements associated with the public realm (streets, parks, infrastructure) will be developed based off of the master plan and subsequent concept development plans. 4.4 Develop a phasing strate~~public improvements. Public projects will be scheduled on a need basis and the projects ability to meet the goals of the master redevelopment plan. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Pagel 4.5 Develop a phasing strate~~private redevelopment. To the extent known, a phasing plan will be identified for private redevelopment parcels in conjunction with the public improvements. 4.6 Identify obstacles to successful implementation. Certain obstacles may pose challenges to successful implementation of the plan. Identifying these obstacles upfront better enables decision makers to minimize "hiccups" along the way. Obstacles may include: relocation of infrastructure, funding, assembly of parcels for redevelopment, etc... 4.7 Develop a community outreach mechanism. Once the plan is completed and implementation begins, community outreach and involvement should be maintained. A plan for ensuring ongoing communication between City officials, developers and the Gladstone Neighborhood will be developed. 4.8 Conduct Staff meeting #7. The subject of this meeting with staff will be to review and refine the implementation manual and prepare for meetings in Task 5. Task 4 Deliverables: Memorandum outlining potential • A review of needed Comprehensive obstacles Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments Memorandum outlining a community and associated technical memorandum outreach approach • Schedule for completion of environmental review process • Project budget spreadsheet for public improvements • Phasing strategy for public and private investments including exhibit detailing proposed phasing plan for public infrastructure • Agenda for meeting Task 4 Meetings: • Staff Meeting #7 Task 5 -Prepare draft redevelopment plan and environmental assessment report 5.1 Compile complete draft of master plan. We will prepare a draft of the Redevelopment Master Plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood to include the following components: • Vision and guiding principles. • Land use plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood. • Illustrative master plan depicting design character and patterns for private development, infrastructure, and the public realm. • Concept master plan for the Savanna and any related improvements • Identification of potential redevelopment sites and strategies for undertaking redevelopment. • Recommendations for vehicle and pedestrian circulation in the Neighborhood and the development of a master transportation plan. (as provided by KHA-see attachment C) Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page 8 • Comprehensive manual for implementing the plan • Technical evaluation of environmental implications (form of AUAR). (as provided by KHA- see attachment C) • A master plan for infrastructure systems including storm water, sanitary sewer, public water systems and private utility services. The storm water master plan will identify improvements that are required to meet storm water quality and quantity requirements for the area, and will define both proposed public and private facilities. (as provided by KHA- see attachment C) • Preparation of a feasibility report detailing the proposed scope of work, estimated costs, financing plan, and schedule for the burial of existing overhead private utilities. (as provided by KHA- see attachment C) • Compilation of information used in developing the plan. 52 Compile complete draft of environmental assessment report. HKGi in collaboration with KHA will assemble the various components of the selected environmental review documentation into a complete environmental assessment report and will begin the public process for environmental reviews. 5.3 Prepare Newsletter #4. HKGi will prepare a newsletter that highlights the draft plan and announces the next public meeting. The newsletter will be finalized after the Staff and Task Force review of the plan . 5.4 Conduct staff review. The draft plan and environmental assessment report will be submitted to staff for review and comment. We will facilitate a working session (Staff Meeting #8) to obtain feedback on the plan. Following staff review of the environmental report, the draft environmental report will be distributed to key agencies for review consistent with processes outlined in State Statutes. 5.5 Conduct Task Force plan review # 1. HKGi will lead the first of two meeting designed to present and receive feedback on the draft plan and environmental assessment report. 5.6 Conduct Board review workshop. This workshop assembles the City Council and all key advisory boards for a plan review meeting. This approach ensures that all parties receive the same overview of the plan and environmental assessment report. It is also beneficial to hear comments on the plan from a wide range of perspectives. 5.7 Conduct Public workshop #4. We will design and conduct a workshop to obtain feedback on the draft plan and environmental assessment report from the community. The format of the workshop will be designed to obtain needed and meaningful input on the draft plan and satisfy statutory requirements of the environmental review process. 5.8 Prepare modifications. We will prepare proposed modifications to the draft plan to reflect feedback received from the previous plan review meetings. 5.9 Conduct staff plan review. This meeting will be to review proposed modifications to the plan and prepare for the final Task Force meeting. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page 9 5.10 Conduct final Task Force review workshop. The objective of this meeting is to reach agreement on the contents of the final plan and environmental assessment report to be forwarded to the City Council. Task S Deliverables: • Draft Redevelopment Master Plan • Completed Draft of the Environmental Assessment Report in the form of an AUAR or EAW as determined in Task 4. (50 copies provided) • Newsletter #4 Task S Meetings: • Developer panel • Staff plan reviews (2) • Task Force plan reviews (2) • Council and Board plan review • Public Workshop #4 • Agendas for meetings Task 6 -Prepare final plan/seek city approval 6.1 Prepare final master plan and environmental assessment report. The final master plan and environmental assessment report will be prepared incorporating reviews from task 5 and distributed to the City Council for final review and approval. 62 Present plan to City Council for review and approval. A presentation in a public hearing format will be made for the Council to consider the plan and environmental assessment report for adoption. 6.3 Make necessary final revisions to the plan and environmental assessment report. 6.4 Produce the final report in printed and electronic form. One printed hard copy and one CD with reproducible electronic files will be provided to the City. 6.5 Produce executive summary of the plan in the form of the final newsletter. An executive summary will be produced to provide an easy guide for interested businesses, developers or residents. This will be produced in conjunction with production of a final newsletter to end this planning phase of the project. Task 6Deliverables: Task 6Meetings: • Final Master Plan and Environmental Council presentation Assessment Report- 1 printed and 1 electronic copy. • Executive summary • Final Newsletter B. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The CONSULTANT and the CLIENT may agree in writing to amend this Contract for additional services related to the PROJECT and compensation for such services. The Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page10 following services have not been requested by the CLIENT but are available upon written authorization. 1. Meetings in addition to those specified in Paragraph A above. 2. Services or Deliverables not specifically identified in Paragraph A above. C. FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The CONSULTANT agrees to complete the scope of work contained in Paragraph A in exchange for professional fee compensation as noted below. The CLIENT agrees to pay the CONSULTANT for services rendered as follows: 1. For the CONSULTANT'S Basic Services described in Paragraph A above, a fee based on the CONSULTANT' S current hourly rate schedule (see Attachment A) not to exceed one hundred ten thousand dollars ($110,000) including reimbursable expenses. 2. For the CONSULTANT'S Additional Services described in Paragraph B, a fee based on the CONSULTANT'S current hourly rate schedule plus incidental expenses or a negotiated fee. 3. Statements will be submitted to the CLIENT on a monthly basis as work is completed and shall be payable within 30 days in accordance with this Agreement. 4. The CONSULTANT reserves the right to suspend services if the CLIENT is delinquent in making payments in accordance with this Agreement. D. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY The CLIENT shall be responsible for the following: 1. Assembly of background information including, but not limited to paper and/or digital copies of all former comprehensive plans, aerial photographs, base maps, inventory data, U.S. Census information, traffic and transportation information and available CAD mapping, limited to those that are reasonably available. 2. Mailing lists, printing, postage and the mailing of invitations for public meetings. 3. Arrangements for public meetings. 4. Reproduction of all interim reports for distribution as deemed necessary. E. COMPLETION SCHEDULE The services of the CONSULTANT will begin upon CLIENT approval and will, absent of causes beyond the control of the CONSULTANT, be completed within nine (9) months from notice-to-proceed date. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page 11 At the beginning of the PROJECT, the CONSULTANT will prepare an overall PROJECT schedule identifying meetings, task completion dates, etc. The CONSULTANT will continually update the PROJECT schedule throughout the course of the work F. SUB-CONSULTANTS To complete aspects of the PROJECT as described in Paragraph A, the CONSULTANT shall make separate agreements with other qualified firms listed in this paragraph. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate the work of Sub-Consultants as part of the work of the PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall not remove the involvement of identified firms or add the involvement of unmentioned firms without written consent from the CLIENT. The identified Sub-Consultants for the PROJECT are: The 106 Group LTD. will be a subcontractor to provide cultural and historical resources assessment associated with the need to complete an environmental assessment report. G. NONDISCRIMINATION The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate by reason of age, race, religion, color, sex, national origin, or handicap unrelated to the duties of a position, of applicants for employment or employees as to terms of employment, promotion, demotion or transfer, recruitment, layoff or termination, compensation, selection for training, or participation in recreational and educational activities. H. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY During the performance of this Contract, the CONSULTANT, in compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants for employment are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT shall post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided by the Government setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. The CONSULTANT shall state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the foregoing requirements of this paragraph in all of its subcontracts for program work, and will require all of its subcontractors for such work to incorporate such requirements in all subcontracts for program work. L IINDEMNIFICATION CLIENT agrees to indemnify, defend and hold CONSULTANT harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, suits, demands, losses, costs and expenses, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and all legal expenses and fees Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Page 12 incurred through appeal, and all interest thereon, accruing or resulting to any and all persons, firms or any other legal entities on account of any damages or losses to property or persons, including injuries or death, or economic losses, arising out of the PROJECT and/or this Agreement, except that the CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to indemnification to the extent such damages or losses are found by a court or forum of competent jurisdiction to be caused by CONSULTANT'S negligent errors or omissions. J. TERM, TERMINATION, SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS 1. The Term of this Agreement shall be concurrent with the work authorized and shall be in accordance with the schedule to be established between the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT. 2. Either party may terminate this Agreement by written notice to the other party at its address by certified mail at least ten (10) days prior to the date of termination. Neither the CLIENT nor the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. 4. The time schedule shall not apply and/or time extensions will be allowed for any circumstances beyond the control of the CONSULTANT. 5. This Agreement shall be governed by all applicable laws. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to fees earned through the effective date of termination. K. DISPUTES In the event the CLIENT and CONSULTANT are unable to reach agreement under the terms of this contract, disputes shall be resolved using alternative dispute resolution (ADR). L. REVOCATION If this agreement is not signed and accepted by both parties within 90 days of the contract date, it shall become null and void. Gladstone NeighborhoodRedeveloprnentPlanning December7, 2004 Pagel3 M. AUTHORIZATION IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The CLIENT and the CONSULTANT have made and executed this Agreement for Professional Services, This CLIENT City of Maplewood day of December , 2004. Name Witnessed by: Name CONSULTANT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Title Title R. Mark Koegler, President Brad Scheib, Vice President ATTACHMENT A HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 2004 HOURLY RATES Senior Principal ................................ ............ $130-140/hr Principal ........................................... ............ $100-120/hr Senior Professional .......................... ........... $120-135/hr Professional III ................................. .............. $80-110/hr Professional II .................................. ................ $65-80/hr Professional I ................................... ............... $50-65/hr Technical .......................................... ................ $35-55/hr Secretarial ........................................ ..................... $55/hr Testimony ........................................ ................... $175/hr Construction Administration ............ ..................... $95/hr Incidental Exbenses Mileage .................................. ........................ 37.5¢/mile Photocopying ......................... ...........................15¢/page Outside Printing ..................... ...................... Actual Cost Diazo Printing ........................ ...................... Actual Cost Draft Plots .............................. ........................ $5.00 each Vellum Plots ........................... ...................... $10.00 each Color Plots ............................. ...................... $20.00 each Maplewood, Minnesota Attachment B-Master Scope of Services Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 Objectives The Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) approach to the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan seeks to achieve several important objectives: Build from previous work This process does not begin from "square one." The City and the Neighborhood have already invested time and money into planning for the redevelopment of this area. These efforts have not reached a conclusion. The continuation of a new process must begin where the previous process ended. We will seek an understanding of what worked, what was unacceptable and what remained unresolved. Create a participatory process that builds a successful plan Meaningful participation in redevelopment planning is a commitment not a commodity. It is not a canned routine applied in the same manner to every project. It is not merely hoops to jump through to get to the end of the process. For HKGi, participation in the planning process means: • Making key stakeholders a part of the process. • Engaging people with divergent views in a meaningful and respectful way. • Building and leading an effective team of staff and other consultants to address the myriad of technical challenges that exist in the Gladstone Neighborhood. • Creating a forum for the exchange of ideas. • Helping people learn about the intricacies of redevelopment. • Reaching a consensus and commitment among the stakeholders to act. • Ensuring that the plan matches the vision for the Gladstone neighborhood and the Maplewood community. A successful redevelopment plan grows out of a planning process based on these principles. Make an effective plan More than any other type of planning, redevelopment must have solutions. Redevelopment planning occurs in places where buildings and uses have become out of date. In these settings, illustrations of design concepts for new development offer an exciting contrast to what exists today. These concepts will not magically happen simply because they are set forth in a plan. Redevelopment requires public and private investments. An effective plan guides the City in making best use of limited public funds to attract and sustain private investment that is consistent with the plan. HKGi s experience with redevelopment projects shows that an effective plan includes: • A vision for the future of the Gladstone neighborhood - an articulation of the qualities and characteristics the community seeks in promoting the redevelopment of the neighborhood. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 1 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 • Clear local objectives for uses and character with flexibility for private investment to create viable and sustainable development. • A "manual" for undertaking all aspects of the plan to remove uncertainty. • Guidance on how to make the best use of limited public resources. Project Team The HKGi approach to the Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan involves a seasoned team of professional consultants with the necessary disciplines to complete the project. This team includes the following firms and consultants: Prime Consultant: Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) Lead Master Planning, Strategic Planning, Landscape Architecture, Urban Design and Implementation Sub-consultants to HKGi: 106 Group Archeological/Cultural/Historical investigation In addition to those firms above, the following firms/consultants are retained by the City of Maplewood through separate contract and will be instrumental in completing this project. Kimley-Horn and Associates (KHA) Project Civil Engineers (utilities, street reconstruction, civil, traffic and transportation) Braun Intertec Geotechnical investigations and analysis Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) Project Engineers (miscellaneous civil and environmental analysis) Rich McLaughlin Urban Designer Project Management Administration of the project will be conducted primarily by Brad Scheib with HKGi and Jon Horn from KHA. All work will be directed by the project managers with approvals gained through City Staff or City Council direction. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 2 Maplewood, Minnesota Work Program for Maplewood Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 The following work program draws on HKGi's experience in redevelopment and on our understanding of the unique situation of the Gladstone Neighborhood. This scope is supplemented with the experiences of KHA and their work on recent engineering projects in Maplewood. Task 1 Assess what has been done This task focuses on the investigations needed to achieve our objective of building from previous work. We will begin the process by developing a clear and comprehensive understanding of the current setting and previous planning. This understanding will grow from both data and from perceptions. This task will also be used to organize the planning process. To ensure a successful start for the Gladstone Neighborhood planning process, HKGi will: L 1 Conduct a "kick off' meetin~(Staff meeting # 1~. The project will be a collaborative effort of HKGi, City Staff and other consulting partners including Kimley-Horn and Associates, Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. and Rich McLaughlin. This project must begin with these parties at the table. The meeting will be used to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each party in this process and to set a detailed meeting calendar. L 2 Collect and analyze existing data. The HKGi team seeks to build on the existing base of knowledge. We want to establish a strong working knowledge of Maplewood, the Gladstone Neighborhood and prior planning. A key step in making effective use of the project budget is avoiding duplication of information. The work program assumes that background information will be collected and provided to the consulting team by City Staff. Among the data sources desired by the consulting team are: • Current comprehensive plan and infrastructure system plans. • McLaughlin design plan and related background information. • Redevelopment plans created by the neighborhood with any supporting information. • Preliminary designs for street and streetscape improvements, including timetable and finance plan (if available). • Maxfield 2003 market research. • Development regulations affecting Gladstone Neighborhood. • Policies on economic development, business subsidies, public improvements and special assessments. • Phase I or Phase II environmental assessments for any area within or adjacent to the project. Task L 2 will also include a critique of the McLaughlin Plan from a real estate market and an urban design/site context perspective. HKGi will invite a select number of developers experienced in first ring suburbs to evaluate and comment on the marketability and the urban design appropriateness of the McLaughlin Plan. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 3 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 1.3 Create neighborhood profile. A profile of the Gladstone Neighborhood helps our team grow in its understanding of the area. It also creates tools to be used throughout the planning process. Redevelopment planning relies on mapping to illustrate current conditions and future scenarios. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) parcel data helps us gain an initial understanding of the Neighborhood. The City will provide the consultant team with electronic mapping files, GIS parcel data, contour data, any existing topology and current aerial photography. Information about the Neighborhood will also be collected on site and where possible cataloged in the GIS database. Our team will walk the area to gain afirst-hand understanding of existing land uses and relationships. In this task, we will: • Create base maps depicting key elements of the physical setting including parcel configuration, building outline and location, streets, sidewalks, parks/open space, and trails and existing infrastructure systems including public and private utility systems and their associated characteristics. • Investigate the feasibility of the burial of existing overhead utilities (telephone, electric and cable TV) within the redevelopment area. This will include discussions with the various private utility companies and the identification of existing overhead utilities that may be candidates for burial as a part of the redevelopment plan. • Complete an assessment of water resources issues and opportunities in the redevelopment area and develop a preliminary storm water routing plan. • Gather existing traffic studies, traffic counts, and background information for the redevelopment area. Initiate discussions with Ramsey County regarding the proposed redevelopment plan and gather their initial comments on the plan and its impact on existing County roadways in the area. • Gather existing subsurface information for the project area and identify additional geotechnical exploration requirements. Initiate a geotechnical exploration program to gather additional subsurface information as needed to help determine the viability of proposed public and private investments in the area. • Prepare inventory of the natural features of the Savanna. • Build GIS database including current land use, parcel size, building size, building age, property valuation, and infrastructure deficiencies. • Create a community demographic and economic profile using 2000 Census data. • Prepare photo inventory of all parcels, structures, infrastructure and public spaces in the Neighborhood. 1.4 Inform the community. HKGi will take several steps to inform the general populations of the Neighborhood and the community from the outset of the planning process. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 4 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 • Prepare general news release. HKGi will prepare and distribute a news release that provides an overview of the planning process and an announcement of Public Meeting # 1. At a minimum, the news release will be sent to the Pioneer Press, the Star Tribune, Real Estate Journal, and Business Journal. In addition to reaching the general population of Maplewood, this news release alerts potential developers about a pending redevelopment project. • Prepare and distribute newsletter # L We propose using a periodic newsletter specifically to inform the Neighborhood and the community about findings and upcoming events in the planning process. The newsletter would be mailed to residents and businesses in the Gladstone neighborhood and posted for general distribution on the City's website. • Explore cable television alternatives. 1.5 Conduct Staff meeting #2. The likely agenda for this meeting will include: • Present and review the Neighborhood Profile to obtain staff feedback prior to using this information in the planning process. • Reach agreement on the final content and plans for distribution of Newsletter # 1. The initial issue will introduce the project and invite people to the first public meeting. • Finalize plans for upcoming Park and Recreation Commission, Task Force and public meetings. 1.6 Conduct workshop with Park and Recreation Commission. The HKGi approach uses a dual path process to plan for the Savanna area. HKGi will work with Staff and the Park and Recreation Commission to focus on specific issues and opportunities for this important element of Maplewood's park system. It is essential, however, that the Savanna is an integral part of plans for redevelopment in the Neighborhood. The initial meeting with the Commission will be used to introduce the planning process, review the results of the Neighborhood Profile (including the Savanna) and learn about Commission objectives for the process. 1.7 Establish Gladstone Redevelopment Task Force and Conduct Task Force Meeting # 1. This Task Force will serve as the steering committee for the planning process. The group will be made up of key public and private stakeholders. It should include both supporters and skeptics. As part of this task, we will: • Prepare a "project manual" for use by staff and Task Force members. The project manual serves as an ongoing reference document including contact information for the consulting team, work program, project schedule, and communications suggestions. • Conduct Task Force meeting # 1. The agenda for this meeting would include setting roles and expectations, a review of the planning process, evaluation of the McLaughlin plan, and exploration of elements for the vision and guiding principles. Task Force meeting #1 will also include a tour of recent redevelopment projects within the Twin Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 5 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 Cities Metro area that may offer insights and "lessons learned." It is likely that this meeting will need to occur on a Saturday in order to accommodate schedules. 1.8 Design and conduct Public Workshop #1. This meeting will be used by HKGi to inform and to learn. We will inform the community about the redevelopment planning process - the steps, the objectives and means of public participation. We will learn from the participants through a series of small group discussion exercises designed specifically for this meeting. The issues to be explored through the group discussions may include an evaluation of existing concept plans including the Gladstone Coalition, the McLaughlin plan, developer concepts and elements of a vision for the future of the Gladstone Neighborhood. We suggest that the presentation portions of these meetings be video taped for use on cable television. Using cable TV to replay the presentation makes accurate information about the project available to a larger part of the community. 1.9 Conduct stakeholder interviews. These one-on-one sessions provide the opportunity for key parties to provide information and guidance to HKGi. These parties may include certain property owners, business owners, interested developers or special interest groups. City staff will assist HKGi in identifying an appropriate list for these interviews not to exceed eight (8) interviews. 1.10 Draft vision and guidingprinciples. HKGi will prepare a draft statement of vision and guiding principles for the redevelopment of the Gladstone Neighborhood. The vision and guiding principles become a means of articulating and reaching consensus on the desired outcomes of redevelopment. Task 7 De/iverab/es• • Project manual • Neighborhood Profile including an assessment of current park facilities and the Savanna • News release • Newsletter # 1 • Summary of Public Meeting • Summary of interviews • Draft vision and guiding principles • Agendas for meetings Task 7 Meetings• • Kick off meeting with Staff. • Staff Meeting #2 • Park/Recreation Commission Meeting #1 • Task Force Meeting # 1 • Public Meeting # 1 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 6 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 Task1 Refine approaches and e~p/ore a/ternatives With the foundation of understanding gained in the previous tasks, our team will begin to develop a series of multi-level concepts for the Neighborhood. Concept development will begin with the "big picture" looking at land use, densities and elements of the public realm including: pedestrian linkages, use of the Savanna, other parks and public spaces, street character, streetscape, utility systems, transit connections, parking and circulation. This level of conceptual thinking will examine broad scale opportunities and will illustrate variations of the long-term vision for the Gladstone Neighborhood. It will also provide the basis for the second stage of the exploration of alternative concept development. The second stage of concept exploration will focus on "private sector" investments including building form and character, materials and context appropriateness. Concepts will identify preferred locations for specific land uses. They will clearly illustrate the way in which redevelopment relates to the existing uses and the possible redevelopment of key properties. Collectively, the big picture and private sector alternatives that will be explored will address a broad array of planning concepts for the project area at a master plan level of detail. HKGi will create alternatives for consideration that depict varying approaches to the "big picture" and "private sector" components. Elements of the public realm will then be advanced to a conceptual design level of detail. The exploration of the concepts must address feasibility. From a public perspective, feasibility means actions and investments needed to remove the barriers to redevelopment. Private development issues will include market demand and financial sustainability. 2.1 Conduct Task Force meeting #2. This meeting will be used to update the Task Force on the results of the process to date and to obtain guidance before beginning a further exploration of redevelopment alternatives. The anticipated agenda for the meeting includes: • Review of the results of Public Meeting # 1 • Summary of interview findings • Review/discussion of the draft vision and guiding principles • Consensus on aspects of previous plans to explore alternatives 2.2 Conduct in-house charrette. HKGi will host a planning and design charrette that will include various disciplines within HKGi, representatives from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Rich McLaughlin and City Staff. The charrette will be organized around the evaluation of the McLaughlin Plan and generating alternative redevelopment plan concepts addressing such elements as land use patterns, building forms, open space systems, park programming, pedestrian connections, infrastructure systems, vehicle circulation and Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 7 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 urban design. We anticipate the charrette to be conducted over the better part of a full day. The charrette will be conducted at the offices of HKGi. 2.3 Conduct Staff meeting #3. This meeting will be used to review the refined results of the charrette and to discuss development alternatives. 2.4 Prepare development alternatives. The charrette leads to the creation of a series of (2-4) alternatives for redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood. The alternatives will include identification of key land use patterns, a general orientation of building footprints and a summary of development units, and a characterization of public realm improvements (streetscape such as lighting, plantings and signage) at master plan level of detail. The alternatives will also integrate park concepts for the Gladstone Savanna. 2.5 Explore feasibility. In reality, the exploration of feasibility has been a part of the planning process since the beginning. Our team has looked for opportunities and barriers that affect the ability to implement the plan. This task focuses on the specific implications for the identified development alternatives. As part of this task, we will: • Identify potential public actions and investments; • Identify infrastructure needs (sanitary sewer, storm drainage, public water and private utility needs); • Identify scope of private utility burial work; • Identify transportation needs (roadways, intersection improvements, transit); • Create redevelopment "proforma" and assess financial "gap" for redevelopment projects at key locations; and • Determine appropriate funding tools available for the plan. 2.6 Conduct Staff meeting #4. This meeting will be used to review proposed development alternatives and the results of the preliminary feasibility assessment. This meeting lays the foundation for upcoming reviews by the Task Force and Park and Recreation Commission. 2.7 Conduct Task Force meeting #3. This meeting will be designed to present and gain feedback on the alternative redevelopment concepts. We will use this meeting to focus on the relationship between redevelopment concepts and implementation. It is important that the Task Force members understand the nature of public and private actions required to undertake these concepts. This meeting will also be used to establish plans for the second public meeting. 2.8 Conduct Park and Recreation Commission workshop #2. We will meet with the Commission to review concepts for the Savanna area in context with the overall Neighborhood. 2.9 Prepare concept modifications. The guidance received from the Task Force and the Park and Recreation Commission will be used to make modifications to the alternatives. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 8 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 2.10 Prepare newsletter #2. The concepts will be distilled into a newsletter (not more than four pages) for mailing and Internet publication. This newsletter will contain information about the public meeting. 2.11 Conduct Public workshop #2. HKGi will design the format of this meeting to promote meaningful interaction with the public on the redevelopment concepts. The first portion of the meeting will be informational -building on the newsletter and providing the participants with information needed to comment on the concepts. HKGi will conduct group discussion exercises designed specifically for this meeting. 2.12 Conduct Staff meeting #5. This meeting will be used to review results of recent meetings (Task Force, Park and Recreation Commission and Public), to discuss upcoming meetings in Task 3, and to consider elements of the preferred alternative. Task 2 De/iverab/es• • Alternative development concepts in graphic form and textual description including master plan concepts for the Savanna • Technical memorandum on initial feasibility assessment • Technical memorandum detailing required infrastructure needs • Newsletter #2 • Summary of Public Workshop #2 • Agendas for meetings Task 2 Meetings• • Charrette • Staff Meetings 3-5 • Park/Recreation Commission Workshop #2 • Task Force Meetings 2-3 • Public Workshop #2 Task3 -Reach consensus on preferred a/ternative The guidance received from the Task Force and the public leads to the creation of a preferred concept for redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood. In this task, HKGi will continue to refine land use, design and implementation details of redevelopment. Throughout task 3, HKGi and the engineering consultants will be formulating a preferred plan in graphic and written format. This will be an evolving plan in draft form that will be confirmed at the end of task 3 and compiled in full report form during Task 5. 3.1 Conduct developer review. HKGi will convene a process to obtain input on the alternatives for redevelopment from successful developers of urban infill or redevelopment projects. The process will involve a series of one-on-one discussions with developers that have experience in similar settings. We have found that this step provides valuable "real Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 9 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 world" input and results in important adjustments to the concepts. HKGi will also use these meetings to test ideas and alternatives for soliciting development proposals. 3.2 Conduct Task Force meeting #4. This meeting will be used to report on the results of Public Meeting #2 and the developer reviews and to reach consensus on the elements of a preferred concept for redevelopment in the Gladstone neighborhood. 3.3 Conduct Park and Recreation Commission workshop #3. This meeting seeks to establish the Commission's preferred scenario for the Savanna as input to the Task Force consideration of the overall redevelopment of the Neighborhood. 3.4 Conduct Staff meeting #6. This meeting will be used to review information collected from the developer reviews, to discuss preparations for the next Park and Recreation Commission and Task Force meetings, and to consider approaches for the environmental review process. 3.5 Prepare Newsletter #3. HKGi will prepare a newsletter that introduces the preferred alternative and announces the next public workshop. 3.6 Conduct Public workshop #3. This workshop will be designed to receive guidance from the community before the process moves from concept to plan preparation. 3.7 Conduct City Council update workshop. This will be a workshop (potentially a joint workshop with other advisory boards) with the City Council to provide an update on the project. Task 3 De/iverab/es• • Modified development concepts • Modified infrastructure needs memorandum Task 3 Meetings• • Developer reviews • Staff Meeting #6 • Park and Recreation Commission • Summary of developer reviews • Newsletter #3 • Agendas for meetings Task 4 - Estab/ish imp/ementation mama/ Workshop #3 • Task Force Meeting #4 • Public Workshop #3 • City Council Update Workshop Previous tasks have identified various implementation tools. Like most redevelopment projects, the Gladstone Neighborhood will not transform overnight, but rather will change gradually over a matter of years. This task will focus on establishing a manual that will guide the short and long term phasing of implementation of the "big picture" elements and the "private realm." It is likely that actual redevelopment in the Gladstone Neighborhood will trigger the need for an environmental review process. There are several factors that may influence the degree and form of the environmental review including specific uses, density, utility and infrastructure needs, timing of developer or land owner initiatives and/or public petition. State law allows for two forms of Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 10 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 environmental review: environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) or an alternative urban areawide review (ALTAR). Each approach has its own advantages. The EAW is typically focused around one specific project and ends with the determination of whether a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary. The ALTAR is an "alternative" form of review that evaluates the "cumulative" impacts of a number of related projects over a larger area. The ALTAR ends with the development of a Mitigation Plan that must be followed. The ALTAR generally satisfies the environmental review needs for most projects within the area as opposed to doing individual EAWs. Both methods follow the same requirements as stipulated by Minnesota Statutes requiring environmental reviews. The scope of work includes conducting the necessary level of planning and engineering analysis to complete the environmental review via either means. Furthermore, Task 4 will outline the process, timing, preliminary budgets, funding options and priority of the various elements of the plan. It will specifically examine sources and uses of funds for property acquisition and it will define the appropriate roles for both the public and private sectors in implementation. A phasing plan will also be established to identify which public improvements will provide the greatest return in terms of facilitating redevelopment and use of public finances. This task will also include a general indication of the timing of private sector redevelopment parcels. 4.1 Review Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance impacts. It is likely that the plan may require changes to existing policy and zoning regulations. The master plan will determine how design guidelines, zoning, and other municipal regulations can be used to implement the vision for the Gladstone Neighborhood. 4.2 Determine environmental review needs and format. This task will establish a basis for the environmental review (ALTAR or EAW) and will provide a detailed schedule for completion of the process. 4.3 Establish public improvements budget. Capital improvements associated with the public realm (streets, parks, infrastructure) will be developed based off of the master plan and subsequent concept development plans. 4.4 Develop a phasing strategy for public improvements. Public projects will be scheduled on a need basis and the projects ability to meet the goals of the master redevelopment plan. 4.5 Develop a phasing strategy for private redevelopment. To the extent known, a phasing plan will be identified for private redevelopment parcels in conjunction with the public improvements. 4.6 Identify obstacles to successful implementation. Certain obstacles may pose challenges to successful implementation of the plan. Identifying these obstacles upfront better enables decision makers to minimize "hiccups" along the way. Obstacles may include: relocation of infrastructure, funding, assembly of parcels for redevelopment, etc... Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 11 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 4.7 Develop a community outreach mechanism. Once the plan is completed and implementation begins, community outreach and involvement should be maintained. A plan for ensuring ongoing communication between City officials, developers and the Gladstone Neighborhood will be developed. 4.8 Conduct Staff meeting #7. The subject of this meeting with staff will be to review and refine the implementation manual and prepare for meetings in Task 5 . Task 4 De/iverab/es• • A review of needed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments and associated technical memorandum Task 4 Meetings• • Staff Meeting #7 • Schedule for completion of environmental review process • Project budget spreadsheet for public improvements • Phasing strategy for public and private investments including exhibit detailing proposed phasing plan for public infrastructure • Memorandum outlining potential obstacles • Memorandum outlining a community outreach approach • Agenda for meeting Task 5 -Prepare draft redeye%pment p/an and environmenta/assessment report The HKGi team will refine the preferred alternative into a draft redevelopment plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood and an environmental assessment report. HKGi will prepare an illustrative document with photographs, sketches, diagrams and supporting narrative to allow people to fully understand what is desired for the Gladstone Neighborhood and an environmental assessment report that satisfies statutory requirements for environmental assessments. It will also provide: • The framework to ensure that reviews of development proposals are substantive and credible. • The information required to make the findings fora "statutory" redevelopment plan. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 12 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 This is equally true of physical changes that are recommended in the master plan. The plan is likely to reflect anticipated changes in land use; vehicle and pedestrian circulation; the qualities and character of public open spaces; connections to adjacent trail systems; architectural character for new structures; identity elements; and the character and location of special features that help create a new and exciting neighborhood area. Key areas of the master plan may be developed to a greater level of detail to demonstrate how specific areas fit the overall plan. While every detail will not be defined in the redevelopment master plan process, the plan that results will provide a solid direction for subsequent planning and design efforts and it will demonstrate how the vision of the community is articulated through key implementation strategies. The master plan is only a "paper plan" at this point in the process. Actual implementation requires the identification of specific strategic steps that will need to be undertaken to achieve desired results. Building from task 4, our team will work with the City to refine the responsibilities and procedures for implementation of the ideas generated during the redevelopment master planning process. The current environment for city government places greater importance on the implementation elements of redevelopment plans. Implementation must look well beyond the simple listing of action steps. Recent court cases point to the importance of building a strong link between redevelopment plans and public actions. One element of the legal challenge to the Best Buy Project in Richfield was the public purpose in the actions taken by the City. The process will set forth the steps and findings needed to comply with the statutory requirements for a redevelopment plan under the HRA Act. The redevelopment plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood will include (as a minimum) the following outcomes: • Vision and guiding principles. • Land use plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood. • Illustrative master plan depicting design character and patterns for private development, infrastructure, and the public realm. • Concept master plan for the Savanna and any related improvements • Identification of potential redevelopment sites and strategies for undertaking redevelopment. • Recommendations for vehicle and pedestrian circulation in the Neighborhood and the development of a master transportation plan. • Comprehensive manual for implementing the plan. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 13 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 • Technical evaluation of environmental implications (form of ALIAR). (with assistance from engineering consultants) • A master plan for infrastructure systems including storm water, sanitary sewer, public water systems and private utility services. The storm water master plan will identify improvements that are required to meet storm water quality and quantity requirements for the area, and will define both proposed public and private facilities. • Preparation of a feasibility report detailing the proposed scope of work, estimated costs, financing plan, and schedule for the burial of existing overhead private utilities. • Compilation of information used in developing the plan. In preparing the draft redevelopment master plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood, the HKGi team will undertake the following tasks: 5.1 Compile complete draft of master plan. We will prepare a draft of the Redevelopment Master Plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood as described above. 5.2 Compile complete draft of environmental assessment report. HKGi in collaboration with KHA and SEH will assemble the various components of the selected environmental review documentation and will begin the public process for environmental reviews. 5.3 Prepare Newsletter #4. HKGi will prepare a newsletter that highlights the draft plan and announces the next public meeting. The newsletter will be finalized after the Staff and Task Force review of the plan . 5.4 Conduct staff review. The draft plan and environmental assessment report will be submitted to staff for review and comment. We will facilitate a working session (Staff Meeting #8) to obtain feedback on the plan. Following staff review of the environmental report, the draft environmental report will be distributed to key agencies for review consistent with processes outlined in State Statutes. 5.5 Conduct Task Force plan review # 1. HKGi will lead the first of two meeting designed to present and receive feedback on the draft plan and environmental assessment report. 5.6 Conduct Board review workshop. This workshop assembles the City Council and all key advisory boards for a plan review meeting. This approach ensures that all parties receive the same overview of the plan and environmental assessment report. It is also beneficial to hear comments on the plan from a wide range of perspectives. 5.7 Conduct Public workshop #4. We will design and conduct a workshop to obtain feedback on the draft plan and environmental assessment report from the community. The format of the workshop will be designed to obtain needed and meaningful input on the draft plan and satisfy statutory requirements of the environmental review process. 5.8 Prepare modifications. We will prepare proposed modifications to the draft plan to reflect feedback received from the previous plan review meetings. 5.9 Conduct staff plan review. This meeting will be to review proposed modifications to the plan and prepare for the final Task Force meeting. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 14 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 5.10 Conduct final Task Force review workshop. The objective of this meeting is to reach agreement on the contents of the final plan and environmental assessment report to be forwarded to the City Council. Task SDe/iverab/es• • Draft Redevelopment Master Plan • Completed Draft of the Environmental Assessment Report in the form of an ALIAR or EAW as determined in Task 4. (50 copies provided) • Newsletter #4 • Agendas for meetings Task SMeetings• • Developer panel • Staff plan reviews (2) • Task Force plan reviews (2) • Council and Board plan review • Public Workshop #4 Task 6 -Prepare fina/p/an/seek city approva/ The guidance received in Task 5 will lead to the preparation of a final Redevelopment Master Plan for the Gladstone Neighborhood. This plan will be submitted to the City Council for its consideration and approval. This task also becomes the springboard for actions needed to implement the plan. To conclude the planning process, our team will: 6.1 Prepare final master plan and environmental assessment report. The final master plan and environmental assessment report will be prepared incorporating reviews from task 5 and distributed to the City Council for final review and approval. 6.2 Present plan to City Council for review and approval. A presentation in a public hearing format will be made for the Council to consider the plan and environmental assessment report for adoption. 6.3 Make necessary final revisions to the plan and environmental assessment report. 6.4 Produce the final report in printed and electronic form. One printed hard copy and one CD with reproducible electronic files will be provided to the City. 6.5 Produce executive summary of the plan in the form of the final newsletter. An executive summary will be produced to provide an easy guide for interested businesses, developers or residents. This will be produced in conjunction with production of a final newsletter to end this planning phase of the project. Task 6De/iverab/es• • Final Master Plan and Environmental Assessment Report- 1 printed and 1 electronic copy. • Executive summary • Final Newsletter Task 6Meetings• • Council presentation Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates I S Maplewood, Minnesota Next Steps -Implementation Phase Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 Upon the completion of the final master plan and environmental assessment report, the redevelopment will be ready to move into the implementation phase. A staging/phasing strategy for the implementation of the various public and private improvements in the Gladstone Neighborhood will be developed as a part of Redevelopment Master Plan (see Tasks 4 and 5). It is expected that the initial implementation task will include the preparation of a feasibility report detailing the scope of work, estimated costs, financing plan and schedule for the construction of the first phase of the public infrastructure required to support the proposed redevelopment. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 16 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood AedeveloPment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 Schedule The following is a tentative schedule for completion of the work scope. This project assumes a kick-off meeting the week of December 13`'' and will require the first Task Force meeting to occur in mid January. The first public workshop would be scheduled for early February. Task Time Line (start date) 1 Assess what has been done December ~ S 2 Refine approaches and explore alternatives Mld February 3 Reach consensus on a preferred Alternative Aprll 4 4 Establish Implementation Manual May 2 5 Prepare draft redevelopment plan and environmental assessment report June 6 (deadline to submit environmental assessment for EQB publlCatlon Is June 20'~-30 day comment period expires on July 27`h) 6 Prepare Final Plan/Seek Review and approval AUgUSt ~ Potential start of private utility burial September--QCtOber Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 17 Maplewood, Minnesota Gladstone Neighborhood Redevelopment Plan Master Scope of Work-6 December 2004 Fees The following fee schedule provides a total project budget to complete the tasks identified in the work scope and an allocation as to fees for HKGi led work and KHA led work. Task Description HKGi ' KHA" Total Budget 1 Build the foundation $ 16,700 $ 35,000 $ 51,700 2 Refine approaches and explore alternatives $ 27,300 $ 28,000 $ 55,300 3 Reach consensus on preferred alternative $ 11,200 $ 5,000 $ 16,200 4 Establish Implementation Manual $ 7,600 $ 20,000 $ 27,600 5 Prepare draft plan and environmental assessment report $ 32,400 $ 57,000 $ 89,400 6 Prepare final plan/Seek approval $ 10,000 $ 6,000 $ 16,000 Expenses $ 4,800 $ 10,000 $ 14,800 Totals $ 110,000 $ 161,000 $ 271,000 * Includes fees for 106 Group to conduct Cultural/Historical Resource Assessment ** Includes fee estimate for S E H (civil engineering) and Braun Intertech (Geotechnical Services) These fees can also be categorized for work associated with the three primary components of the project including the environmental assessment report, the master plan and the public utilities. The fees are allocated in this manner as follows: Environmental Assessment Reporting ~ Master Plan $ Public Utilities $ Total Project Budget g Total Fee HKGi Fees KHA Fees Breakdown 50,000 $ 48,000 $ 98,000 56,000 $ 53,000 $ 109,000 4, 000 $ 60, 000 $ 64, 000 110,000 $ 161,000 $ 271,000 Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates 18 Agenda #K4 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit -Mapletree Group Home LOCATION: 2831 Southlawn Drive DATE: December 3, 2004 INTRODUCTION Mr. Jon Brandt, representing the Mapletree Group Home, is requesting that the city approve a conditional use permit (CUP) for the property at 2831 Southlawn Drive. This request is to allow the Mapletree Group Home to have up to 12 residents live in the residential facility (group home) on this property. (Please see the letter on pages six through eight and the maps on pages nine and ten). State law allows Mapletree to have up to six residents living in the group home without city approval. To have more than six residents in the home, the city must approve a CUP for the property. DISCUSSION The city regulates land uses and activities in residential areas to help insure that residential properties stay residential in use and in character. Having up to 12 residents in a dwelling in a residential area could create a disturbance to the neighbors or could change the character of the neighborhood. That being said, a house with driving teenagers (with their vehicles and their friends' vehicles coming and going) also has the potential for disturbing the neighborhood. The fact is, while this facility has been in operation (since 1991), staff is not aware of any major problem or significant disturbance caused by the residents. This facility was planned and built as a duplex with a total of eight bedrooms and five bathrooms in nearly 4,000 square feet of floor space. This is the equivalent of the space and facilities in two single dwellings. In fact, Mr. Brandt recently converted the garage of the house into atwo-bedroom apartment that serves as a transitional facility for two older boys in the program. Having up to 12 residents and two or three staff members in a facility of the size of this building should not create a crowded situation within the home. As long as the owners continue to keep and operate the facility in a careful and respectful manner, the addition of up to six additional residents (for a maximum of 12) should not cause anymore problems. For the city to approve a CUP, the city must find that the proposal would meet several findings. have listed the required findings in the resolution starting on page 19. My review of these findings shows that the proposal would meet all the findings, except possibly number five (about traffic and congestion). At least two of the neighbors expressed a concern about the possibility of increased traffic on Radatz Avenue because of the proposed population increase. They commented that the street can get crowded and that they thought the additional residents would add to the traffic volume on Radatz Avenue. OTHER COMMENTS Lieutenant Kevin Rabbett of the Maplewood Police Department reviewed this proposal and noted that he did not find any significant public safety concerns. He also stated "I am impressed with the new program changes, especially the awake staff at night with the increase in residents. I would like to suggest that, in addition to neighborhood participation on the advisory board, a member of the police department should also be involved." Lieutenant Rabbett followed up his initial comments with the following information: 1. There have been about 100 case numbers for the home in the last ten years -including 10 calls from January though November 2004. 2. The vast majority of the calls are for administrative reports, alarms and runaways. 3. There were about six reports of assaults or disturbances, all of which appeared to involve residents. 4. I found only a couple of theft reports in the neighborhood that mentioned residents as possible suspects. 5. There does not appear to be a significant effect on the neighborhood (by having the group home there). David Fisher, the Maplewood Building Official, reviewed the proposal and offered the following comments: 1. The facility must have all state and county licenses. 2. The facility must meet the current code standards for exiting. 3. Smoke detectors are required to meet current code standards for location and wiring. Butch Gervais, the Maplewood Fire Marshal, reviewed this proposal and noted that he agreed with the comments of Mr. Fisher. Mr. Gervais also inspected the property on December 2, 2004 and found it to be generally in good shape. He did notify Mr. Brandt of the following corrections that he needed to make: 1. Better secure the gas line to the dryer. 2. Change the heat detector in the apartment to a smoke detector. 3. Remove the extension cords from the bedrooms and replace them with power strips. 4. Add a smoke detector in the hallway leading upstairs from the lower level. 5. I suggest that the owner install a battery operated smoke detector in each bedroom. 6. Have the fire alarm system properly serviced and maintained. SUMMARY This request presents challenges for the neighbors, city staff and for the city council. The city must review the proposal and determine that it would meet the findings required by the city code. In addition to the standards in the city code, the city must balance the interests of the owner, the operator and those of the neighborhood when considering this request (and all requests). In this case, eight of the nine neighbors that responded to our survey were against the expansion of the group home. The city has received additional comments in letters and a-mails since we did the first neighborhood survey. I have included those comments on pages 15 through 18. The addition of up to six more supervised residents in this home should not have a negative impact on the neighborhood. To help insure that the additional residents do not cause problems, city staff is proposing several conditions of approval, including a city review of the CUP in one year. 2 RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution starting on page 19. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for the Mapletree Group Home to have up to 12 residents living in their residential facility at 2831 Southlawn Drive. This permit shall be subject to the following conditions: The owner or operator of the facility doing the following: a. Parking the vans or vehicles for this facility on the driveway or in the garage. There shall be no parking of the vans or vehicles of the facility on a public street. b. There shall be no more than 12 residents living in the facility. c. Have staff awake each night by July 1, 2005 or sooner, if required by other licensing agencies. d. Adding additional onsite electronic monitoring to the facility (including window alarms). e. Having an annual open house for the neighbors of the facility. Make all the corrections/additions as required by the fire marshal. 2. The owners or operator shall not do any maintenance or repair of their vans or vehicles on the public street. 3. The operator shall get the necessary licenses or approvals from Ramsey County or from the State of Minnesota. 4. The owner or operator shall ensure that the house has the proper emergency exits and smoke detectors that meet current standards before adding any additional residents above the six allowed by law. 5. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 3 CITIZENS' COMMENTS surveyed the owners of the 25 properties within 500 feet of this site. Of the ten replies, one was for the proposal and nine were against the proposal. For I strongly support the Mapletree Group Home expansion. They have been great neighbors. I have lived here for 15 years and there have never been any incidents or problems with the kids since the home started. I support giving these youth a second chance. (Mielke - 2796 Southlawn Drive) Objections 1. See the letter from Tom Schuette of Azure properties on page 11. 2. See the a-mail from the Zuks on page 12. 3. See the a-mail from the Pearsons on page 13. 4. See the letter from Earl Steinbring on page 14. 5. See the letter from the McKanes on page 15. 6. No! We want a nice safe neighborhood. Mr. Brandt has turned our neighborhood into a group home. He has rental property people moving in and out every few months. We want nice families living on Radatz and on Southlawn. (Ricke - 1809 Radatz Avenue) I also received telephone calls from four other neighbors on Southlawn Drive and on Radatz Avenue opposing this request. 4 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 13,068 square feet (0.30 acres) Existing Land Use: double dwelling SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Houses on Southlawn Drive East: Double dwellings across Southlawn Drive South: Houses on Southlawn Drive West: Future Mapletree townhouse site CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL Section 44-1097(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. (See findings 1-9 in the resolution on pages 19 and 20.) PLANNING Existing Land Use Plan designation: R-3(M) (medium-density residential) Existing Zoning: R-2 (single or double dwellings) Application Date The city received all the application materials for this request on October 14, 2004. State law requires the city to take action on this request by December 13, 2004, unless the applicant agrees to a time extension. Attachments: 1. Applicant's Statement 2. Location Map 3. Property Line/Zoning Map 4. Letter dated 10-27-04 from Tom Schuette 5. E-mail dated 10-28-04 from the Zuks 6. E-mail dated 10-25-04 from the Pearsons 7. Letter dated 11-01-04 from Steinbring 8. Letter dated 11-6-04 from McKanes 9. E-mail dated 11-15-04 from Nicole Zuk 10. Letter dated 11-23-04 from Chisago County Court Services 11. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 5 N~a t~etr~~ 2831 Southlawn Drive, Maplewood, MN 55109-1146 www.mapletree.arg October 12, 2004 To: City of Maplewood From: Jon Brandt, MSW Director, Mapletree Group Home, Inc. Re: Application for a Conditional Use Permit Attachment 1 651 - 777_7722 fax: fi51-748-1284 Jon Brandt, ACSW, LICSW janbrandt[a2aol.com Director Note: the following is not meant to be complete information about our program orto answerall the questions and concerns that we would like is answer far city officials and neighbors. We approached some of our nearby neighbors two years ago with information about our program and possible expansion plans. We are now ready to move ahead with those plans, pending city appror-al. We will be holding an open house at the group home for the community, and look forward to meeting with folks at city hall. Mapletree has been operating as a private non-profit group home far kids since 1991. The residence is a legal duplex, in R-2 zoning. The house was architect designed and built in 1989. It has nearly 4,000 ft~ of finished living area, with eight bedrooms and five bathrooms. All adjacent property is owned by the director of Mapletree. It is bordered to the west by R-3 land (under development), to the south by an R-1 single family home, and to the north by an R-2 twin home. The properties across the street to the east are R-2 twin homes. All the property immediately surrounding the group home is rental property. Commercial property adjacent to the Maplewood Mall begins 100 feet to the north. Mapletree is currently licensed by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) to provide residential services for up to six boys. There is also a transitional living apartment on- site that accommodates two more young men, who are graduates of the program. Typically, up to eight residents, ages 16-19 are provided housing and program services at any one time. A conditional use permit is not required for our current operation. Our request for a conditional use permit is to expand services to 12 residents. Mapletree has had city inspections for building, health, and fire codes. We will request new inspections for code compliance. DHS has indicated that they will approve a capacity of 12, pending city approvals. Mapletree is now in it's 14~' year, having served over 100 teenage boys that were in need of an out-of-home placement. Because of program limitations, we have #urned down hundreds of referrals over the years. Bays are referred to Mapletree by counties from across Minnesota. The strength of our program is the capacity to work with older teenage boys who are on probation, many far felony level offenses. Some of the boys have struggled with drug and alcohol issues; some have been gang involved. Many residents have been child victims of physical, sexual and emotional abuse. Some have, in tum, repeated that behavior. Many of the boys at Mapletree have been adjudicated delinquent for various sex offenses. Most of those cases involve a sibling. The director is a licensed mental health professional, and has been evaluating and treating adolescent sex offenders for twenty years. Most of the boys who are referred to us have been in correctional placements, and have either completed a program, or have made sufficient progress #or the courts to determine that supervised placement in the community is appropriate. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT 6 Mapletree Group Home 4pplication fcr CUP Page 2 of 3 Most boys referred to Mapletree cannot live at home because of family problems. They are not appropriate for a foster home because of the difficulty of their emotional issues or the seriousness of their offense history. The boys that are accepted at Mapletree are screened for community safety, motivation, and ability to benefit from the program. Mapletree is staffed 2417. On duty staff demand a high level of accountability for each of the residents. Almost alf the guys at Mapletree attend North High School, hold jobs near the Maplewood Mall, and make friends in the neighborhood. Most residents blend seamlessly into the community. As a result of good supervision, effective programming, and hard work by the boys, the majority of residents graduate successfully from Mapletree after six to 12 months. There are many indicators of the quality and effectiveness of residential programs. Mapletree has an extraordinarily low absconding rate, reflecting the high motivation and desire the boys have to make their placement at Mapletree a success- Recidivism while at Mapletree is also extremely low. Police calls to the program are exceptionally low for a group home for juveniles. There have been a few simple (misdemeanor} assaults within the program. Some residents have been involved in stealing or shoplifting from employers or area merchants. We're very proud of our track record where it counts the most: with a high percentage of our residents placed following serious offenses, only a small #raction have re-offended while at Mapletree. Despite the serious mistakes that some of our residents have made prior to placement at Mapletree, none have brought any violence into the sun-ounding community. None of the bays at Mapletree have committed offenses of any kind involving our neighbors. Mapletree has five fulltime and three part-time staff. Currently a Mapletree staff person sleeps overnight at the group home, after the boys go to bed. This model for staffing helps to preserve a foster family atmosphere. The same staff person that puts the boys to bed gets the boys going again in the morning, before changing shifts. We have some security measures and electronic monitoring in place at the group home, and have not had serious nighttime problems. Awake staff at night is not astate-licensing requirement for facilities such as ours. Our long-term impact on young men is reflected by the fact that every week former residents call or stop by for a visit with their Mapletree family," much like young adults who have emancipated from #raditional families. The boys can find many pictures of themselves in the house of past birthdays, Christmases, and camping trips. Many graduates, some who are now past 30, fondly recall their time at Mapletree as an oasis of calm and stability during a time when their lives were in chaos. We have a good working relationship with the Maplewood Police Department, North High School, the Maplewood Community Center, Premier Bank, Aspen Medical, Ramsey County Library, most of the restaurants, and many of the retail outlets in the community. Supporting the boys at Mapletree in a successful transition to adulthood has truly been a community endeavor. Some boys return home from Mapletree, but mast prepare for independent living at 18. Various provisions in Minnesota laws keep kids on probation after 18 and some residents to stay until they are 19 or 20. Completing an education, building job skills and getting these guys back on track before they become adults is in the community interest. We are proud of our track record at Mapletree, and the city of Maplewood can be proud of being home and host to a program that has a high success rate and is widely respected by social workers, probation officers, judges, and mental health professionals throughout Minnesota. The demand for the services that we provide at Mapletree is high. Even in the midst of a difficult economy and tight public dollars, Ramsey County maintains a contract with Mapletree to provide services through their Departments of Con'ections and Children's Services. 7 Mapletree Group Horne Application for CUP Page 3 of 3 Summary We would like to expand our capacity at Mapletree to 12. The increased capacity will allow us to serve more kids, increase staff, improve programming, and meet new, more stringent state licensing standards set to go into effect July 1, 2005. We are considering a second Maplewood area group home, but because of our ideal location we would rather expand our current location than add a second facility. There are advantages of economy and efficiency to one location. In support of approval for a conditional use permit #or Mapletree: • Have already been in operation, in the same location since 1991 • We are licensed by the state and accredited by the MCCCA • Mapletree is located on the edge, rather than in the middle of a residential area • Our current location has an excellent support network for young men transitioning to independent living • We have had more than i 00 young men come thru Mapletree over 13 years -most with successful outcomes • The adverse impact of MapCetree on the neighborhood and the city has been minimal • City services to Mapletree have been minimal. • We have and will maintain a good working relationship with Maplewood PD • We are able to meet all city criteria for approval of a condi#ional use permit • At present, the city has almost na control over Mapletree. A CUP creates and defines cooperation between the city and Mapletree. As part of a conditional use permit far 12 residents at Mapletree urns are proposing the following program changes: - Awake staff at night - Increased security measures, including additional onsite electronic monitoring - Adding one or two neighbors to our advisory board - An annual open house for neighbors to address community concerns - An annual review of any incidents that result in safety or security concerns }t is our expectation that the impact of flour more Mapletree boys on the community will be minimal. We have been quietly operating in a corner of Maplewood for thirteen years. During that time we have been almost invisible to our neighbors, have served more than 100 young men and their families, provided a valuable service to the juvenile corrections -child welfare systems, and channeled more than $3,000,000 into the local economy. With on-going support from the community, we hope that Mapletree will continue to be home to many more young men that need what we do. 8 LOCATION MAP Attachment 2 PROPERTY LINE/ZONING MAP Attachment 3 10 October 27, 2IX14 _. _.a.. _ ~: . ~... ,, ,. ,~ ,. ~ . ?7~nta~ M..SCJaeette I f6S1) ~6-3432 F (6S1} 4~-3444 ~ ;~~. _. ire i ac t --.- - ---~ttac~iment 5 x~ ~#: Fly, 4' 2q, ~: ~~ ABM '~o: 1~n IGs~ ~.r~.us - vrned(s) horns amaN s it ~s Te~e# body. - Thar ~: R~pbexts, Ucf. 28, 2004 ~avfl~e'~~~+-aildl~e#~my~ .' s~ ~ ~d ~ ~ k~er from faE ~Y er ate: ~ ~ ~ cif any ~.~ or eves ~~ ffie fr+e. ~'iaa Yom. 2uti Z ?4~t 5av~ ~f~wr~ 'D~ t ~~ 12 Page 1 of 1 Attachment 6 Ken Roberts From: Scott, Jenni and Maxwell [sjcosmo@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 1:32 PM To: Ken Roberts Subject: Mapletree Group Home Hello Kenneth, I am emailing a response about the Mapletree Group home. My husband and I both agree that the group home has not been a problem in our neighborhood. We do not, however, want the city to give them a permit for more residents. We feel that the facility should stay the same. We don't want increased residents, staff, visitors, etc.. on our road and in our neighborhood. Radatz Avenue receives enough traffic without this addition. Thank you for your time. Jennifer Pearson 13 12/3/2004 V p.w~J 1 ~~ . _ _ _ ~.. "F W r o' t f f N } T �{ >4 ! e i R ow l W« h f 4 a n x f Inw k [ Iq r ? � ' A i 9z t f f N } T �{ >4 ow l W« h f 4 a n x f Inw { Y .. ~ Page I of 2 From= #te~cs.riet [mailtaaf#eiuks~ao~casbr~et~ 9+el~s ~r,;•A 14 Z00412:~3: PM 1lV~;R~-' M~ ~; 3ac_ kie ~MOhahan Jun~lc; ICathieen ]uer+emann Cc R~ob~rt Via!„1trt Cardinal °~od-~n.us -~tr~ vrord(s~ free sec E~ome sexual ~d cwt mope in the Text ~'Y Q~ ~ . ~~uP Nom: Dear iCity C~cxl members, _ . My name is 11Ticole Zuk,and I am;a resident of Maplewood. I currently reside two dcwrs down from the Mapletz~e pup dame, at,279~ ~outhlawn I)r. When we purchased our hoax in' I998 we were not told ofthe Coup homeseacrst~nee I~am tryinp:tn inform myself ofthe impactthis will have un our nborttaod:s~hould;the:expansion gp.througti. I have talked to the Ramsey County Assessor fc~r 11'LPIe'waa~ w$s ta.~~: although the Croup Tome will not affect my property value it will definitely have an i#npact on any. resale ppssibilities should. we ever choose to resell. I was told we would -have tc~; diselosce the Getup honaie..if the ~expaasion vent through, to any possible buyers, this would probably. result in us leaving to lovuer ~y;~s~g ;price for anyone;who would be interested. My parents own a home: in St. Paul -sad; they;learoed first hind of the issues it could raise. They were. not~i~d,affier y signed the papers to b~:tlaeir hake that there was a sex offender in the - neighbarhoadand; iiried too back out,o~the purchase;of that home..The seller's hgwever lowered the asking price o~ the. house -and they did putcl~ase it. ,Since our house is our. biggest investment eve can not risk the. gropp how expansion, anal the: affect it ~atqul~ lutve on us. I Dave sit my. eoer~ts to Ken Rob~crts to pass on to dse City Council and the Pl~mm~g Commission, however,,i am trying to find out moire information on-the the guidelines set for the Group hone regarding security and supasrvision of the boys who recede in the home. I spoke with Chief Thomalla of the Maplewood Police Dept and he did tell me-that ~. past 10 years there have been over 100 police calls to the Group Home. He said they ranged frirm runaways, arson, and thefts of the employees cars that work far the Group home, as well as calls speeif~catly for the boys whoa reside there. We have had no troubles with hny of the boys, but we hays noticed they don't seem to be as supervised and one would hope. There have been incidents where we have seen them having relations wish girls in cars parked down the streets and-they seem to be free to walk aroand the neighborhood as we have observed them often walking dawn the streets. My father works wth.a lot of at risk boys and has .done so for many years. I do believe everyone-deserves a second chance but as a-parent of 2 young daughters, the thought of sexual predators two doors away of course. raises all sorts of concerns for us. My father has told me most of the places he workexi at are required to leave a security system in place, he also thought it would `be a conflict of interest tlaxt Mr. Brandt is the owner atui Director of the Getup Homs:. I was told by Mr. Brandt of : elect tlay Group home does not-have a security .system.. He sand he does plan to have window alarms ll®d should the expansion go through. He had also told me though ti~at they didn't have a emblem wiltr aay of the kids trying to get out which according to Chief Thomalla is untrta; as the police have rccieved calls 16 l 1/15/2t~34 ,, , i k 4 _ '~ I f - - - . f 651-213-1 Lac CsI1s Attachment 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION - MAPLETREE GROUP HOME WHEREAS, Mr. Jon Brandt, representing the Mapletree Group Home, is requesting that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit to have up to 12 residents live in the residential facility (group home) on the property at 2831 Southlawn Drive. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 2831 Southlawn Drive. The legal description is: The south 96 feet of the north 636 feet of the east 158 feet of the SE1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. (PIN 03-29-22-41-0015) WHEREAS, this history of this conditional use permit is as follows: On November 15, 2004, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The commission also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council deny this permit. 2. On December 13, 2004, the city council discussed this request. The council gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above-described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because: The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 19 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The owner or operator of the facility doing the following: a. Parking the vans or vehicles for this facility on the driveway or in the garage. There shall be no parking of the vans or vehicles of the facility on a public street. b. There shall be no more than 12 residents living in the facility. c. Have staff awake each night by July 1, 2005, or sooner, if required by other licensing agencies. d. Adding additional onsite electronic monitoring to the facility, including window alarms. e. Having an annual open house for the neighbors of the facility. Make all the corrections/additions required by the fire marshal. 2. The owners or operator shall not do any maintenance or repair of their vans or vehicles on the public street. 3. The operator shall get the necessary licenses or approvals from Ramsey County or from the State of Minnesota. 4. The owner or operator shall ensure that the house has the proper emergency exits and smoke detectors that meet current standards before adding any additional residents above the six allowed by law. 5. The city council shall review this permit in one year. The Maplewood City Council this resolution on December 13, 2004. 20 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 COUNTY ROAD B EAST, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2004 I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Chairperson Lorraine Fischer Present Commissioner Eric Ahlness Present Commissioner Jeff Bartol Present Vice-Chairperson Tushar Desai Present Commissioner Mary Dierich Absent Commissioner Michael Grover Present Commissioner Daniel Lee Present Commissioner Gary Pearson Absent Commissioner Dale Trippler Present Staff Present: Ken Roberts, Planner Lisa Kroll, Recording Secretary V. PUBLIC HEARING (7:06- 9:05 p.m.) a. Conditional Use Permit -Mapletree Group Home (2831 Southlawn Drive) Mr. Roberts said Mr. Jon Brandt, representing the Mapletree Group Home, is requesting that the city approve a conditional use permit (CUP) for the property at 2831 Southlawn Drive. This request is to allow the Mapletree Group Home to have up to 12 residents live in the residential facility (group home) on this property. State law allows Mapletree to have up to six residents living in the group home without city approval. To have more than six residents in the home, the city must approve a CUP for the property. Commissioner Trippler said he would prefer to see the residents that are "for" and those that are "against" the proposal indicated on the map and would like that information included in future staff reports. He read in the staff report of the 25 properties surveyed, nine replies were against the proposal. However, before the meeting began staff handed an additional letter to the commissioners from a resident who was also against this proposal. According to the list of objections listed on page 3 of the staff report, he only sees five objections to this proposal and after the late submittal of the letter now makes six objections. He asked where the addresses were for the remaining neighborhood objections that Mr. Roberts received. Mr. Roberts said he received telephone calls from four other neighbors on Southlawn Drive and Radatz Avenue opposing the request but the neighbors did not specify their exact address. Commissioner Trippler asked how staff knew for sure the callers lived in the neighborhood if the callers did not give staff their exact address. 21 Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 11-15-04 Mr. Roberts said he relied on the fact that the neighborhood residents called and said they received the mailing from the city regarding this proposal and wanted to share their comments regarding the proposal for the Mapletree Group Home. Commissioner Bartol asked if staff knew if there was a shortage of group homes in Maplewood? Mr. Roberts said he wasn't sure there was a need for more group homes in Maplewood, however, the operators of the group homes have stated there is a waiting list and a demand for their services. Group homes operate out of individual homes, multiple locations or they expand within the facilities that they already have. He can't give numbers of how many people are on a waiting list but he gets the sense from speaking to the directors of these group homes that they could double the capacity and still not have enough room for people on the list. He isn't sure if that was a city wide or a Ramsey County problem. Commissioner Desai said he remembered hearing during a past commission meeting compared to other communities in the twin cities metro area Maplewood had a large proportion of group homes. Mr. Roberts said the number of group homes had been looked at on a county-wide basis. As a percentage of the county population verses the number of group homes, Maplewood has more than their fair share of group homes based on population. He doesn't have numbers to share regarding how many group homes there are metro wide. Commissioner Desai asked what staff meant by their recommendation for additional electronic monitoring equipment? Mr. Roberts said he was referring to an electronic security system. This would alert the staff if a resident was trying to leave through a window or door during the night. Commissioner Desai said according to the letter handed out by staff this evening from Nicole Zuk at 2799 Southlawn Drive, she stated she spoke to the Ramsey County Assessor and was told because of the number of residents at the group home, homeowners that wanted to sell their house would be required to disclose there was a group home with sex offenders living there. Mr. Roberts said because of the law that was recently passed by the State of Minnesota, home sellers have to notify potential home buyers of any substantial or important facts about the home and the area of the home that could affect the buying decision of a potential buyer. The home seller is required by law to release information such as a road project that would include assessments, or a shopping center being built down the block, or an existing facility such as this. Commissioner Bartol asked staff if that was true or if it referred to only six or more residents in the group home? Commissioner Desai said when the commission looks at the overall community's interest in this he would be concerned if neighbors are affected by this group home and don't even know how this would affect them if in the future they tried to sell their home. 22 Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 11-15-04 Chairperson Fischer said if a person didn't relinquish this information they could be sued in the future for not releasing the fact that they knew a group home existed in the neighborhood and did not state that up front. Commissioner Trippler said he understood for the city to approve a CUP the city must find that the proposal meets several findings. He asked if the applicant was required to show a hardship in order for the city to grant a CUP? Mr. Roberts said no, hardships are for variances but not for a CUP. A CUP is more subjective and the applicant has to show how they meet the findings in the ordinance that are in the resolution. Mr. Jon Brandt handed Mr. Roberts information regarding the sellers property disclosure to share with the commission. Mr. Roberts said under the "No Duty to Disclose" portion it states there is no duty to disclose the fact that the property was or is occupied by somebody with HIV or aids, that there was a suicide, accidental death, natural death or perceived paranormal activity. That it is located in a neighborhood containing any adult family home, community based residential facility or nursing home. There is no duty to disclose information regarding an offender who is required to register under Minnesota Statutes 243-- or about whom notification is made under that section which is predatory offender or sex offenders. If the seller in a timely manner provides a written notice about the information about the predatory offender registry and the person is registered with the registry maybe obtained by contacting the local law enforcement agency where the property is located. Commissioner Grover asked if the property owner that owns the vacant property behind the group home had been contacted about this proposal? Mr. Roberts said yes, Mr. Brandt is the owner of that property which has been approved by the city council to build nine townhomes there to be called the Mapletree Townhomes. Commissioner Bartol said regarding the "No Duty to Disclose" piece of information given to staff by Mr. Brandt, did that refer to registering as an adult sex offender or as a juvenile sex offender? He wasn't aware juvenile sex offenders were required to register with the state? Mr. Roberts said this piece of information does not state people have to register, it only states you as a home seller do not have to disclose information about an offender who is required to register with the state. You as a home seller can direct people to find that information at other sources. He was not aware however, if a sex offender had to register as an adult or as a juvenile. Commissioner Desai said he read the letter from Azure Properties objecting to this proposal and asked if staff knew which homes Azure Properties managed on Southlawn Drive? Mr. Roberts said he wasn't sure but he believed it was the homes across the street from the group home. Azure Properties also owns the Chili's property, US Bank property, and the Outback Steakhouse property, as well as the property next door to the Ramsey County library where they had proposed building a DQ Chill & Grill which was denied by the city council. 23 Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 11-15-04 Commissioner Lee asked if staff knew how many group homes could be located within one neighborhood? He said essentially this proposal would be like having two group homes on the same block. Mr. Roberts said he didn't know how many group homes could be located in one neighborhood. Chairperson Fischer asked the applicant to address the commission. Mr. Jon Brandt, representing the Mapletree Group Home, 2831 Southlawn Drive, Maplewood, addressed the commission. Mr. Brandt spoke from 7:45 p.m. until 8:45 p.m. and the following is a condensed version of what he said during his presentation. Mr. Brandt said he has been a resident at 2837 Southlawn Drive since 1989, which is next door to the Mapletree Group Home and he has been the Founder and Director of the Mapletree Group Home since 1991. He provided handout materials to the planning commission and he discussed aloud the handout page by page. He said he does not "want" to be here tonight, he "has" to be here tonight. He would like to go on quietly operating the Mapletree Group Home as he has for 13 years but because of the new state laws, Mapletree may be legislated out of existence in the summer of 2005. He is not aware of other group homes that deal with the population of young adults they work with. The Phoenix Group Home works with young adults with chemical dependency issues and the Mapletree Group Home works with young adults with a history of sexual offenses. Mr. Brandt said a few years ago he went into the neighborhood to let the neighbors know Mapletree Group Home planned to expand. He was surprised to hear how many neighbors did not know the Mapletree Group Home existed in this neighborhood. This was good news for him because when it comes to group homes, no reputation is a good reputation. The Mapletree Group Home was created to fill a need in the juvenile system. It's a residential program that can work with kids who have made some serious mistakes with their behavior but are low risk offenders. In the late 1980's he began to search for the ideal location in the twin cities for a group home to serve this population and established the following criteria. (See handout #1) It should be in close proximity to Ramsey, Washington, Dakota, Anoka and Chisago Counties. Should have easy freeway access, employment opportunities for residents, close to a Community or Technical College, variety of special educational facilities, parks and recreational opportunities, close to a community center or YMCA, close to health care facilities, close to a library, good public transportation, and have a location on the edge of a neighborhood rather than in the center of one. They found that location on Southlawn Drive in Maplewood and opened the Mapletree Group Home in 1990. (See handout #2) for the Mapletree Time Line (See handout #3) for the New Licensing Laws - MN Statutes/Rules Chapter 2960 go into effect on July 1, 2005. This is a sampling of the new licensing laws but is by no means complete. Mr. Brandt said because of the new licensing laws that would go into effect in July 2005, Mapletree cannot meet the new licensing laws as they are currently organized. Mr. Roberts asked Mr. Brandt if he could briefly explain why the state has changed the laws and require the new rules. 24 Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 11-15-04 Mr. Brandt said about 4 or 5 years ago the state legislature directed the (DOHS) Department of Human Services and the (DOC) Department of Corrections to bring their licensing laws together. The licensing laws had not been rewritten since 1964 so the legislature directed the two organizations to solicit feedback from correctional facilities, foster homes, group homes, and residential treatment centers from across Minnesota to rewrite the licensing laws. They participated in public hearings over the last 3 years at which time input was solicited for the new licensing laws and those laws were finalized 6 months ago and go into effect July 1, 2005. (See handout #4) for the three options Mapletree Group Home has to work from. Mr. Brandt said one option is to expand Mapletree at their existing location, (for more information see Handout #5). Option two is to open a second group home spreading new licensing demands over more staff at two locations. They would apply for a waiver from the state which they were told would be granted to continue to operate with a sleep staff at night and would not be subject to community approval. This is not a viable plan for Mapletree because it takes some of the problems they have at one facility and moves it to another location. Lastly, their third option is to close the Mapletree Group Home all together. If the facility closes, ultimately the community beyond Mapletree will suffer. The same kids that live at Mapletree would be released from correctional facilities and into the community without the support and supervision that they need, without finishing school, without building job skills, without saving money to have an apartment, without having a chance to be sober outside the walls of a correctional facility, without having a chance to put into practice the things they learned in treatment. Many of these young men will turn to drug abuse and drug dealing, will become homeless, and will begin to commit crimes as adults that the Mapletree Group Home tried to prevent when they were juveniles. The truth is it takes a village to raise kids in today's society. Mapletree can't do it alone and they aren't. Each of the young men at the Mapletree Group Home have a placement team which include, a probation officer, county social worker, their parents when available, sometimes outside therapists, and the staff at Mapletree. They have a psychologist that holds groups with the boys, and they have a tutor that comes in once a week to help with homework and help track progress at school. All the boys must be in school or working to complete a GED, the boys are expected to have jobs, they work in the community and are required to save 80% of their earnings. When problems are identified at work Mapletree meets with their employers to help the boys build job skills and become better employees. Some of the boys are required to do community service or pay restitution and give something back to the community. 25 Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 11-15-04 Mr. Brandt said until now a state law shielded small group homes and foster homes from community restrictions and made it possible to operate without local supervision. Because he is requesting to increase their license capacity beyond 6, they have become subject to the jurisdiction of Maplewood. Mapletree has been operating with the city's trust for many years and now to stay in existence they need the city's consent. Under Minnesota law, local communities have no control over the placement of foster or group homes with fewer than 6 residents. For this reason there are hundreds of group and foster homes across Minnesota that have 6 or fewer residents. Most small group homes in Maplewood and across Minnesota are for developmentally disabled adults. This allows people to live in the community rather than in an institution. The typical size group home for troubled youth across Minnesota is 10 to 12 residents. Some programs are licensed for 14 to 20 kids, but with that many kids it's becoming more of an institution than a group home. Mapletree needs to expand to stay in existence and are asking for a licensing capacity of 12 residents. It is unlikely they will have 12 kids except during occasional peak periods. Most likely they will have 10 to 11 kids which is where they need to set their budget. During certain budget crisis they have had to go into their reserves to pay their bills. Because they have reserves they have never had to make harsh decisions such as taking kids or keeping kids that don't belong at Mapletree. They will never make decisions for financial reasons that will compromise community safety just to keep beds full. (See handout #7 for further information). Mr. Brandt said Mapletree has had about 108 kids come through the group home in 13 years. Nearly all the boys at Mapletree fall under the opportunistic category and are at a lower than low risk (as shown on the handout). Mr. Brandt said in support of approval for a conditional use permit for Mapletree (see handout #8). As part of a conditional use permit for 12 residents at Mapletree they are proposing the following program changes. (see handout #9 for these changes). Chairperson Fischer invited the public to come forward and speak regarding this proposal. The following people spoke during the public hearing for the CUP for Mapletree Group Home, 2831 Southlawn Drive. 1. Nicole Zuk, 2799 Southlawn Drive. 2. Micky Manders, 2804 Southlawn Drive. 3. Earl Steinbring, 1795 Radatz Avenue. 4. John, a former resident at the Mapletree Group Home. 5. Paul S., Licensed Psychologist. 26 Planning Commission -7- Minutes of 11-15-04 Nicole, Zuk, 2799 Southlawn Drive, Maplewood, addressed the commission. Ms. Zuk said she understands and sympathizes there should be group homes for boys that have committed crimes who deserve a second chance. Does she want those boys living two doors down from her when she has two young daughters and the majority of the residents are sex offenders, absolutely not! Her father has worked with at-risk kids for years and won the KARE 11 award for that. When she shared this information with her father he thought there was a definite conflict of interest. Because Mr. Brandt is the Owner and Director of the Mapletree Group Home this is leaning towards a financial aspect for Mr. Brandt to make money off this proposal. Especially since Mr. Brandt owns the property behind the group home where he will build nine town houses. She said he seems to have his own monopoly going. She went to the open house at the group home on Sunday, November 14, 2004, and still has concerns. Currently there is no awake-staff there now, they have one staff member and his room is in the basement bedroom in the far corner. The boys in the home currently sleep in the upstairs bedrooms. There is no security system in place yet. The staff member that gave her the tour told her in the four years he has worked at Mapletree there have been two attempts to sneak out when the kids unscrewed the bolts in the windows. She talked to Police Chief Thomalla on Wednesday, November 10, 2004, and he said in the past 10 years there have been over 100 phone calls to the Maplewood Police Department regarding the group home and there have been a number of walk-offs and runaways. She spoke to the Ramsey County Attorney's office and she spoke with the Maplewood City Clerk. She also spoke with Ramsey County Assessor, Pete Fredrickson, who told her Wednesday, November 10, 2004, that if they tried to sell their house the fact that she lives near the Mapletree Group Home would have to be disclosed in the paper work. She said unfortunately, when they bought their home in 1998 the fact that a group home was operating in this neighborhood wasn't disclosed to them. He said because of the licensing requirements it didn't have to be disclosed since there were 6 boys or fewer there, but if there were more than 6 boys at the group home they as the home sellers would have to disclose that information if they tried to sell their house. Mr. Fredrickson said it would not affect their property value but they probably wouldn't get their asking price based on the property value if that information was disclosed. She said basically most people are not going to want to buy a house next to 12 felon boys. Ms. Zuk said her parents bought a house in St. Paul and ran into a similar situation. Her parents found out after they signed the real estate papers, that there was a sex offender in the neighborhood and tried to back out of the agreement. Because of the situation, her parents ended up paying considerably less than the asking price for the home because of this. She spoke with the Ramsey County Commissioner, Victoria Rhinehart, and asked who sets the guidelines for security and supervision over group homes. Ms. Rhinehart's Human Resources Department is looking into that and will contact her with more information. Before her and her husband realized a group home was there her husband came home from work at about 6:20 a.m. and witnessed two boys holding a pellet gun. It appeared the boys were going to the open space next to her house maybe to shoot rabbits. Had they known there was a group home operating next door they would have called the police to report the boys had pellet guns. She isn't sure what the level of supervision is because these boys are free to roam the neighborhood. Two months ago one of the boys from the home had a girlfriend that would pull into her driveway, the boy would run down and jump into the girl's car and they would drive down to the dead end to probably have sexual relations. 27 Planning Commission -8- Minutes of 11-15-04 Ms. Zuk said during the course of all of her telephone calls she has been asking who inspects group homes and how often that inspection takes place, but nobody has had an answer to that question yet. Mr. Brandt rents out a home next to her home and it has been a constant revolving door of renters moving in every 6-to-12 months. Most of Mr. Brandt's renters are college age and often hold parties and the next morning beer bottles and glasses are strewn on her property. When she asked the staff member that gave her the tour what the success rate was for the residents at Mapletree he wasn't sure but guessed a 50% success rate. Mick Manders, 2804 Southlawn Drive, Maplewood, addressed the commission. He said his daughters were "cat called" by some of the boys at the Mapletree Group Home. Another incident that occurred was some of the boys at the group home threatened to beat up his son and a friend that was over. When this occurred, Mr. Manders said he telephoned Mr. Brandt and said some pretty harsh words to him, but never contacted the police. Mr. Manders said he had also seen the boy running down to the parked car and to have sexual relations with the girl driver just as Ms. Zuk did. In fact over a two week time frame he saw the boy do this five to six times. The boy looked at Mr. Manders face, point blank with a grin on his face while running to the parked carwith the girl waiting inside. Mr. Manders said he doesn't understand how you can have sexual offenders living in a group home, and they are that free to run around. He wants to know where the security and supervision is. Mr. Manders said 14 years ago Mr. Brandt came before the city council and said he wanted to build homes in this location. He never said he wanted to build a group home on Southlawn Drive, tonight Mr. Brandt commented that he had told the city council he planned on building a group home here. He never stated to the neighbors he was going to have a group home with sexual offenders living there and now he wants to double the number of boys living there from 6 to 12. There are many young girls that walk up and down the streets to the mall and surrounding area. There are also a lot of girls that live in this neighborhood and he doesn't feel comfortable knowing the freedom these boys with sexual offenses have living here. There is also the open space behind the property. It seems there are too many temptations for the boys living in the group home. As far as resale value for these homes, he's sure none of the commissioners would buy a house knowing sexual offenders were living within 100 yards of the home. He thanked the planning commission for their time. Mr. Earl Steinbring, 1795 Radatz Avenue, Maplewood, addressed the commission. He said he has lived in this house since 1952. Azure Properties owns two houses and rents them out. Those people that rent those homes never received a letter from Maplewood stating there was a public hearing for the group home. He said maybe it's because they are renters. When Mr. Brandt came around to get signatures from the neighbors for approval to build these homes Mr. Brandt told him his mother would be living in one of the duplexes. Had he known Mr. Brandt was going to have a group home with sexual offenders living there, he would have never signed his name to the petition. John, a former resident at the Mapletree Group Home, addressed the commission. 28 Planning Commission -9- Minutes of 11-15-04 The reason he is here tonight is to support the Mapletree Group Home and what they do to help young adults. These are not sexual predators. He said he would not be here today if it weren't for the support of the staff at the Mapletree Group Home. He came to the group home out of a treatment center which was a very uncomfortable place to be. He lived at Mapletree about 10 years ago; he got a job, went to school, and did what he needed to do to complete the program. It is easy to say people don't want this group home in their backyard. John said he has his own children now; he works at his job and is a success because of the program at Mapletree. A lot of what he has accomplished wouldn't have happened, couldn't have happened, if it weren't for the program at Mapletree. To close Mapletree down means you are saying to the kids you are better off in jail because society and the community doesn't want you. When you feel that way, why would you try to succeed in any other place in your life. He never had a problem with the people in the community. Mapletree was a nice place to live. It wasn't as comfortable as living in your own place but he gave up that right with his history. The kids need this type of home. If programs like Mapletree weren't located here this type of group home could be located someplace else. Without group homes like this, these young adults would be locked up in jail. If this is an opportunity for kids to get help we should want the kids to get the help they need, not put them in jail and get no rehabilitation. It's not easy for the kids living there, it is not easy for the staff, and it is not easy for the community. As Mr. Brandt said, it takes a community to raise youth today. He hopes his presence here can help this program because without the program at Mapletree he would not be standing here or be the person he is today. He thanked the commission for their attention. Paul S., a Licensed Psychologist, addressed the commission. Paul said he has been the licensed psychologist since the inception of the Mapletree Group Home in 1991. Much of the success for the residents at the Mapletree Group Home is directly related to Jon Brandt and the quality of staff Mr. Brandt has been able to acquire. He said the typical resident is 16 to 18 years of age up until 21 years of age and that these adolescents are in need of transitional living arrangements. They are often continuing in their treatment in some manor whether that be AA, individual therapy or treatment. Most of the residents are on probation and are continually monitored to evaluate their risk to the community. Over the years the referral sources have gotten to know the staff at Mapletree and who would best transition from prior placements to Mapletree. Residents who are referred are considered to be compatible to the services and support of the group home and its staff. 29 Planning Commission -10- Minutes of 11-15-04 Paul said the residents are expected to follow the rules and expectations. These expectations include, but are not limited to, accountability, community safety, attend high school or Vo-Tech, work on a full or part time basis depending on their educational needs and goals, they are required to complete court-ordered community service or restitution, participate in Mapletree therapy groups, and independent skill groups, meet regularly with a Mapletree case manager, and develop individualized treatment goals. Paul said they are also expected to participate in their staffing and progress reviews. The screening process that is referred to Mapletree is typically a phone call made to Mr. Brandt or staff and final material reviewed. Assuming the adolescent is not actively psychotic or diagnosed with a significant neurological impairment, arrangements are made to meet with the potential referent for aface-to-face interview. If the file review and the initial meeting go well, arrangements are made for a day or overnight visit. The rules and expectations at Mapletree are discussed and the needs of the adolescent are reviewed. The placement visit is intended to evaluate the appropriateness of the referral and to attempt to determine if a match exists between the adolescent, Mapletree's program and the existing residents. Occasionally new residents are accepted on a provisional basis. Once a resident arrives at Mapletree a treatment plan is developed in coordination with other treatment plans such as the county social worker. Often psychological testing is administered to determine the needs, goals, insights and strengths of the resident. Paul said Mapletree has enjoyed a good relationship with the Maplewood Police Department, North St. Paul High School and its neighbors over the years. Paul said expanding this program, no doubt will tax the staff and the program, but it will also raise potential concerns due to the increased number of potential residents. Community safety has always been the top priority not only for Mapletree but for the referral sources, community partners, employees, neighbors, the residents' families, and the young adults themselves. Poor decision making and on-going criminal or antisocial behavior often makes for incarceration as an adult. The stakes are high for the young men which are referred to Mapletree. The young men that are referred to Mapletree are often in need of a safe and structured living environment and are encouraged and expected to transition back into the community with the support of staff, residents, other professionals, and family members, if available. These young men have complex histories and have struggled with a variety of issues, often coexisting mental and chemical health diagnosis. They experience family of origin dysfunction, attachment issues and conduct disorder, just to name a few. Mapletree's primary goal is to assist these young men in assimilating back into the community and use the new tools they have acquired along their journey in a positive pro-social manor to become valued citizens. He thanks the commission for the opportunity to speak tonight and for listening to him. Commissioner Ahlness asked if the applicant had any special rights owning a duplex to divide or construct in a way there could be more than one group home? Mr. Roberts said the zoning is R-2, which by ordinance, is for single-family homes or double dwellings. That is how the home to the north can exist as a single family home even though it is zoned R-2. In this case Mr. Brandt was allowed to convert the garage to a separate apartment because he has the R-2 zoning. The main house functions as one house with its own garage and separate entity, then the garage was converted to a separate apartment with its own kitchen. He said in a way the property is already functioning as two separate homes with the apartment for two residents and the main part of the home housing six people. 30 Planning Commission -11- Minutes of 11-15-04 Acting Chairperson Desai asked why Lieutenant Kevin Rabbett of the Maplewood Police Department didn't find significant public safety concerns but Nicole Zuk said when she spoke to Police Chief Thomalla he stated there were over 100 phone calls to the police department over the past 10 years? If you divide the number of complaint calls over 10 years that comes to about 10 calls a year, which still seems significant to him. Mr. Roberts said when the police department provided their comments for the staff report that information was not included or broken down so all staff has to refer to is the comments from Lieutenant Rabbett. He hopes to get more information broken down for the report that would go to the city council. If there were issues to be concerned about, he assumed he would have received more details. Mr. Roberts said he took Lieutenant Rabbett's comments as being supportive of the program at the Mapletree Group Home. Commissioner Grover referred to the conditional use permit resolution on page 15 of the staff report. Item number 2. states the use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. He asked Mr. Roberts if he could give further information regarding that condition? Mr. Roberts said basically everybody will have a different perception or opinion of what changes the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. He said to use the past proposal that came before the planning commission to build a DQ Grill and Chill next to the US Bank property. During that review, planning commissioners were concerned that adrive-thru and speaker system would change the character of the neighborhood and that it would affect the surrounding property. That proposal was denied by the city council. He said one could argue that adding six more residents to the existing group home wouldn't change the character of the surrounding area because the home already exists. Commissioner Bartol said because the state is requiring the Mapletree Group Home to comply with additional steps, financially Mr. Brandt cannot run this group home with six residents. Also Mr. Brandt said he had to dip into the reserve bank account during a time of crisis. If he cannot get city approval for the CUP to have more than 6 residents, Mr. Brandt cannot build his bank account back up to assist with paying the bills. This is a make or break situation for Mr. Brandt. Either the city approves the CUP or the Mapletree Group Home may have to close down. If anybody's property is going to depreciate with this group home here it would be Mr. Brandt's property located behind the group home where he proposes to build nine townhomes. Commissioner Trippler asked if that was something the commission should be considering? He asked if the city had seen any bank accounts to verify if the city did not grant the CUP Mr. Brandt would have to close the Mapletree Group Home? Acting Chairperson Desai said he understood Mr. Brandt's financial hardship was not in the current stage but he would be under a financial hardship when the new state guidelines took place in July 2005. 31 Planning Commission -12- Minutes of 11-15-04 Commissioner Trippler said he understands that. The city should assume this is an on-going business. Mr. Brandt is projecting what his costs would be in order to meet the criteria and the new law in 2005. His projections may or may not be valid because there has not been a financial accounting of whether or not Mapletree could stay in business with six residents. He asked if that was a valid reason for the commission to grant or not to grant the CUP? In his opinion that was not one of the criteria the commission was being asked to evaluate. Commissioner Grover said he would agree. According to page 15 and 16 of the staff report that is not one of the criteria for the commission to follow. Commissioner Trippler said it may be a consequence of not granting the CUP but he is not sure that is what the planning commission is being instructed to weigh. This is a residential community with a group home with six residents. The question is will there be a difference at the group home doubling the occupancy. If they have six residents now and it's working out, doubling the number of residents may not be better. It sounds like they are running a wonderful facility with six residents although he has heard testimony that the Mapletree Group Home has run into some problems. He's not sure changing the occupancy number is the right thing to do and he's not sure changing that number fits in with the existing character of the neighborhood. As staff stated earlier, this is a subjective decision that each commissioner is going to have to make. Personally he doesn't feel comfortable doubling the size of this facility in this neighborhood. CommissionerAhlness said Mr. Brandt made some compelling arguments regarding the service he offers at the Mapletree Group Home. Something to consider is state law has been established to protect group homes for up to 6 residents. The wisdom of this law is to preserve the residential and family oriented nature of the program and of the neighborhood. As the state statute would change and go into effect July 1, 2005, that number remains at 6 residents. The market will decide whether this group home stays or goes. The responsibility of the commissioners is to determine whether or not increasing the number of residents from six to twelve is a good fit for the neighborhood. There has to be a balance between community and the provider. He thinks that is already provided by the state code at 6 residents. For these reasons, he is going to vote against this proposal. Chairperson Fischer said one of the concerns she heard was that services that were available in the larger setting wouldn't be available for six or fewer number of residents in a group home. As the state mandates better security and services, the state must feel those things are not in place and should be. Her subjective opinion is that one larger group home would affect the neighborhood less compared to two smaller group homes. A larger group home is not a perfect setting in every neighborhood and this group home is located almost on top of the Maplewood Mall. 32 Planning Commission -13- Minutes of 11-15-04 Commissioner Bartol said Commissioner Ahlness compared this group home to a market. These are county dollars and from time to time there is not enough tax dollars to go around. When the state can't find the tax dollars, these young adults are the ones that would end up suffering. If there was a great deal of money to be made from owning and operating a group home he believes there would be more than one group home like this in the State of Minnesota. As Mr. Brandt had stated in his speech, his staff workers make what a beginning teacher would make, obviously people are not in this field to make money. He believes with the new state statutes the Mapletree Group Home would have to comply with the rules and regulations and some of the concerns of the neighbors could disappear. According to Mr. Brandt's handouts, handout #9 seems like he is reaching out to the neighbors and including them in the process and he commends Mr. Brandt for that. In addition, this CUP would be reviewed in one year. For the sake of the young adults that are in need of this program, he believes the city should grant this CUP and review it in one year review and see how things are working out. He would encourage the commissioners to recommend approval of this CUP. Acting Chairperson Desai said he can't understand managing six residents makes this a difFicult financial situation. When voting as a planning commissioner he doesn't take financial situations into consideration. He's trying to objectively look at this based on a planning commissioners responsibility according to city staff recommendations as well as taking into consideration what the neighborhood has to deal with and live with. Acting Chairperson Desai said when he heard there had been over 100 phone calls to the police department from this address with six or fewer residents living at the group home this concerned him. Increasing the number of residents from six to twelve could result in even more telephone calls to the police department. He is concerned about the neighbor's comments and concerns that the commission heard tonight as well the statements included in the staff report. He thinks there may be a better location for a group home of twelve residents in another neighborhood, but not in this neighborhood. For these reasons he will be voting against this proposal. Commissioner Lee said he thinks increasing the number of residents from six to twelve is asking for trouble. He said he's voting against this proposal as well and has taken into account the comments shared by the neighbors. Commissioner Grover moved to recommend to aeue-deny the resolution starting on page 15 of the staff report. Denying a conditional use permit for the Mapletree Group Home to have up to 12 residents living in their residential facility at 2831 Southlawn Drive. Commissioners Ahlness, Desai, Grover, Lee and Trippler said the reason they recommended to deny the CUP for the Mapletree Group Home was that the proposed use would change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area and the use would depreciate property values. Commissioner Trippler seconded. Ayes -Ahlness, Desai, Grover, Lee, Trippler Nays- Bartol, Fischer The motion to recommend denial passed. This item goes to the city council on Monday, December 13, 2004. 33 AGENDA NO K-5 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: AMBULANCE RATES FOR 2005 DATE: December 7, 2004 INTRODUCTION It is proposed that ambulance rates be increased effective January 1, 2005 to provide the anticipated revenue in the 2005 Budget and to make our rates comparable to those charged by other providers. BACKGROUND Ambulance rates have been increased annually over the past several years. Past rate increases have been based upon the average charged by other providers. During preparation of the 2005 Budget, a survey was conducted of rates charged by other providers in the area. (Survey information is listed in the attached table.) In 2002, the Mercer Group prepared a Strategic Business Plan for Fire and EMS Services. In their report they indicated that consideration should be given to setting ambulance rates at a level to finance the estimated full cost of the EMS Program. This option has been considered in the past but rejected because it has been important to keep the Maplewood ambulance rates comparable to the rates charged by other providers. The estimated full cost of providing ambulance services has been calculated for 2005 and it totals $1,491,370. It is important to note that this is an estimate and the estimated indirect costs of $333,810 are a large portion of the total. If the Maplewood ambulance rates for 2005 were set to finance the full cost of ambulance services, the rates would be significantly higher than the rates charged by other providers in 2004. Also, the rate increases would be significant and there would probably be many complaints about the rates. S:\FI NANCE\Word\Misc\AMBUL05a. DOC 1 Therefore it is proposed that the rates for 2005 be equal to 3% more than the average 2004 rate charged by other providers. This will make the new rates similar to the rates that will be charged by other providers in 2005. The proposed rate changes are as follows: AMBULANCE RATE INCREASES Increase 2004 2005 Amount Percent Non-transport Resident $270.00 $290.00 $ 20.00 7.4% Non-resident 290.00 310.00 20.00 6.9 Basic life support: Resident 710.00 780.00 70.00 9.9 Non-resident 740.00 815.00 75.00 10.1 Advanced life support 1: Resident 975.00 1,030.00 55.00 5.6 Non-resident 1,020.00 1,080.00 60.00 5.9 Advanced life support 2: Resident 1,100.00 1,150.00 50.00 4.5 Non-resident 1,155.00 1,205.00 50.00 4.3 Charge per mile 12.46 13.00 0.54 4.3 RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the attached resolution is recommended to set the rates for 2005. S:\FI NANCE\Word\Misc\AMBUL05a. DOC 2 SURVEY OF AMBULANCE RATES 2004 RATES NON- PROVIDER BASIC ALS1 ALS2 TRANSPORT MILEAGE ALF Ambulance (A) Cottage Grove EMS Hennepin County Medical Center HealthEast-St. John's HealthEast-St. Joseph's Lakeview Hospital St. Paul, City of White Bear Lake Woodbury Average Maplewood: Resident Non-Resident $ 641.33 $ 843.06 $1,073.33 $ 262.00 $ 12.90 816.25 1,231.48 1,231.48 245.01 11.66 845.00 972.00 985.00 314.00 15.00 575.00 1,200.00 1,250.00 0 12.75 859.00 1,053.00 1,239.80 415.00 16.50 1,124.80 1,124.80 1,406.05 414.00 11.65 922.00 922.00 922.00 240.00 11.00 325.00 565.00 625.00 115.00 9.00 716.50 1,111.50 1,326.50 270.00 13.50 $ 758.32 $1,002.54 $1,117.68 $ 284.38 $ 12.66 $ 710.00 $ 975.00 $1,100.00 $ 270.00 $ 12.46 740.00 1,020.00 1,155.00 290.00 12.46 (A) Serves Apple Valley, Lakeville, and Farmington S:\FI NANCE\Word\Misc\AMBUL05a. DOC 3 RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2005 AMBULANCE RATES WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and and WHEREAS, the paramedic ambulance services are partly financed by property taxes; WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge non-residents a higher rate than residents for services rendered; and WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the distance a person is transported and by type of services provided; i.e., basic or advanced life support services as defined by Medicare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective January 1, 2005: Residents Non-Residents Base rates: Non-transport (treatment administered) $ 290.00 $ 310.00 Basic life support ambulance services $ 780.00 $ 815.00 Advanced life support ambulance services 1 $1,030.00 $1,080.00 Advanced life support ambulance services 2 $1,150.00 $1,205.00 Rate per mile transported $ 13.00 $ 13.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge when the patient has not been administered treatment and is not transported, when the patient is transported to the detoxification center, or when the patient is transported in a squad car. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if more than one person is transported, the ambulance charges will be pro-rated between the people transported. S:\FI NANCE\Word\Misc\AMBUL05a. DOC 4 AGENDA ITEM K-6 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Chris Cavett, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Beaver Lake School/Geranium Park Drainage Improvements, Project 04-35: Receive Petition and Resolution Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Study DATE: December 6, 2004 Introduction School District 622 has had concerns about an erosion washout problem adjacent to Beaver Lake School. The problem is occurring on school district property and is extending onto the city property at Geranium Park. The city council will consider receiving the petition from the school district and approving the resolution ordering the preparation of a feasibility study. Background Attached is a petition from School District 622 requesting the City of Maplewood to conduct a feasibility study to determine the work scope and cost to correct a washout problem on and adjacent to the school district property. Staff has been in discussion with the school district maintenance supervisor as they have investigated how to fix this problem. As the problem is somewhat larger in scope than they are accustomed to and the drainage and erosion are having an impact on city property, staff has suggested that the city could do the improvements as part of a public improvement and assess the costs for the work back to the school district. They submitted the petition letter as they are interested in exploring the public improvement process as an option. It is recommended that this issue be referred to staff for investigation. Budget Impact The estimated cost of the preliminary report study is $4,000. The study cost will be paid as part of the project funding, which will be defined in the study. At this time, the majority of the project funding is expected to be assessments to the school district. Any costs not covered by assessments to the school district would likely be funded from the Environmental Utility Fund. Recommendation Staff recommends that the city council approve a motion authorizing preparation of a study report for the Beaver Lake/Geranium Park Drainage Improvements, Project 04-35, and authorize the finance director to transfer $4,000 to the project fund. Attachment: Petition Site Map �avwg�mp� �"x, a ,, MUMN, w m"ma- me mm v rm lialmlorsar W- E31 a-MI10,171a, Tl �avwg�mp� �"x, a ,, MUMN, w m"ma- me mm v rm lialmlorsar W- E31 a-MI10,171a, Location Map Beaver Lake School -Geranium Park Drainage Improvements Project 04-35 AGENDA ITEM K-7 AGENDA REPORT TO: Richard Fursman, City Manager FROM: Charles Ahl, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: County Road D Realignment West (TH 61 to Highridge Court), City File 02-08 - Approve Four Agreements for Right of Way and Easements with LMCD Properties DATE: December 7, 2004 Introduction On February 9, 2004, the city council conducted a public hearing and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the realignment of County Road D on the west side of Trunk Highway 61 to Highridge Court and eventually extending westerly on the existing alignment of County Road D to Walter Street. An agreement for the acquisition of storm water ponding areas and easements has been negotiated with Steve McDaniel of Toyota and Rick LaMettry of LaMettry AutoBody, who jointly own various parcels within the area under the title of LMCD Properties. Approval of the four agreements for the various properties is recommended. Background On December 9, 2002, the city council approved a resolution to proceed with a project to realign County Road D from Hazelwood Street to TH 61 and from TH 61 to Highridge Court. That resolution was the culmination of many hours of discussion and debate with staff, agencies, other communities and property owners that occurred over many years. On May 12, 2003, the city council selected a final alignment for new County Road D. The city council received a petition from Trout Land, LLC on November 10, 2003, for the construction of County Road D between TH 61 and Highridge Court and authorized preparation of a preliminary report for the improvement. Following the public hearing on February 9, 2004, the city council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the project. On June 28, 2004, the council approved the final plans and specifications for the realignment of County Road D between TH 61 and Highridge Court and authorized advertisement for bids. On August 9, 2004, the city council approved the final agreement for the right of way and cooperative grading with Trout Land, LLC. A contract for construction of the improvements was awarded on September 13, 2004, when rights of entry were secured for the project construction. The final details of the various agreements were remaining for final approval. Those agreements are now ready for approval. The attached color photo map shows the various parcels of land that encumber the regional storm water pond. The pond was constructed as a part of the development requirement for the Toyota parking area at Beam Avenue and the construction of the LaMettry Auto Body building. The pond is now proposed to serve the entire development area and needs to be provided under City ownership to allow for revisions and upgrades. LMCD Properties has agreed to convey the underlying fee ownership of the portion of the property that is currently encumbered by easements as a dedication to the City at no cost. In exchange, they request assurance that the removal of the property from their ownership will not create anon-conformity to their development. This condition is included within the agreement. A portion of developable property is also included for purchase from LMCD properties. The agreements, copies of which are attached to this document, are by property as follows: ,: LaMettry LLC Agreement ,. LMCD Properties Agreement ,. MM Agreement ,: MMH Agreement City Council Agenda Background LMCD Property Acquisition Agreements December 13, 2004 Page Two Budget Impact The $168,000 expense for the property purchase within the LMCD property acquisition is within the amount budgeted for this easement and estimated for this project. The remainder of the easements are being dedicated to the City at no cost. At this time, it appears that adequate funds still remain to keep this project fund on budget. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council approve the acquisition agreement with LaMettry Properties LLC, LMCD Properties of Minnesota, LLC, MMH Investments, LLC, and M & M Partnership of Minnesota, LLP and approve the payment of $168,000 to LMCD Properties of Minnesota, LLC for the County Road D West Realignment Project (TH 61 to Highridge Court), City Project 02-08. RCA Attachments: MMH Investments, LLC Agreement M&M Partnership of Minnesota, LLP Agreement LaMettry Properties, LLC Agreement LMCD Properties of Minnesota, LLP Agreement Location Map (2) AGREEMENT TO CONVEY THIS AGREEMENT is made on this day of December, 2004, by the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and MMH Investments, LLC, a limited liability company in the State of Minnesota ("MMH"). A. MMH are the owners of the property, known as 1241 Beam Avenue, legally described as: That part of the south 253 feet of the east 608.40 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 61; and The west 115 feet of the east 723.40 feet of the south 350 feet of the south 350 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. B. MMH desires to convey the following described portion of its property described in Paragraph A to the City: All that part of said west 115 feet of the east 723.4 feet of the south 350 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4 lying northeasterly of the following described line and its extensions: Beginning at the northwest corner of said west 115 feet of the east 723.40 feet of the south 350 feet of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 4; thence southeasterly for 134.02 feet to a point in the easterly line of said west 115 feet of the east 723.40 feet of the south 350 feet of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, distant 67.01 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said west 115 feet of the east 723.4 feet of the south 350 feet of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 4 as measured along the said easterly line, and there terminating ("Subject Property"). City desires to obtain the property on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receiving adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, MMH and City agree as follows: Sale and Purchase. Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, MMH hereby conveys to City and City hereby receives that real property located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, as more particularly described above in Paragraph B, together with the right, title and interest of MMH in and to any overlaps or gaps between the respective parcels of real property described in Paragraph B. It is understood that this Agreement is to be executed in conjunction with the other Agreements for the land contiguous to the land being sold herein to the City (copies of which are attached hereto for reference). It is a condition precedent to this Agreement that the other Agreements shall be closed or none of them shall close. In addition, if the City is in default under the terms of any of the Agreements, then the City shall automatically be in default under all of the Agreements. Consideration. Subject to the performance by MMH on all of their obligations hereunder and satisfaction or waiver by City of all contingencies set forth in subsequent paragraphs hereof, the following shall be the consideration for City's purchase of the Subject Property from MMH. The City shall allow MMH to utilize the area of the property conveyed to the City as a part of this Agreement to meet its green space requirements for existing and future development on the remaining property described in Paragraph A of this Purchase Agreement. Closing Date. The Closing of this purchase and sale shall take place at the Maplewood City Hall on or before December 31, 2004, unless extended pursuant to agreement of the parties. Possession of the Subj ect Property shall be delivered to the City on the date of Closing. MMH and City shall equally split the costs of Closing. Closing costs shall not exceed $500.00. 4. Documents to be Delivered. a. To the extent not heretofore delivered to City, within ten (10) days after the date hereof, MMH shall deliver to City copies of all soil tests and reports, engineering studies and reports, environmental tests and reports, surveys, plats, topographical information, utility service information, correspondence with utility companies, highway departments, transportation officials and town, county or state governmental entities, contracts and agreements affecting the Subject Property, to the extent such documents are in their possession or control; b. If City has performed all of its obligations hereunder to the date of Closing, MMH shall, on the date of Closing, execute, where necessary, and deliver to City the following: Warranty Deeds from MMH to City free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encroachments, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever; ii. Uniform Seller's Affidavits from MMH indicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens, or bankruptcies against or involving MMH and that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Subject Property for which mechanic's liens could be filed; there are no other unrecorded interests in the Subject Property of any kind, including but not limited to any leasehold interests in the Subject Property; iii. All other documents to be executed by MMH affecting title to andlor possession of the Subject Property and necessary or convenient to transfer the same to City under Minnesota law or practice, free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances; iv. MMH shall pay the state deed tax and conservation taxes payable upon recording the above deeds. MMH is responsible for all outstanding and payment in full of assessments levied and pending. City is responsible for recording fees on any documents, other than deeds required by City to be recorded; Execute and deliver to City and City's title insurer, if any, an appropriate Minnesota Uniform Conveyance Form Affidavit (Form 116-M, 117-M or 188-MO evidencing the absence of bankruptcies, judgments, or tax liens involving parties with the same or similar names as MMH and evidencing the absence of mechanic's lien rights affecting the Subject Property, unrecorded interests affecting the Subject Property, persons in possession of the Subject Property and known encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Subject Property; vi. Execute and deliver to City anon-foreign affidavit in recordable form containing such information as is required under Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and any regulations relating thereto; vii. Execute and deliver to the Closing agent, with a copy to City, a completed Minnesota Department of Health Well Disclosure Certificate or include on the deed "MMH certify that they do not know of any wells on the described real property" or the statement "We are familiar with the property described in this instrument and we certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate; ' followed by MMH's signature. If there are wells on the Subject Property, MMH are responsible for capping andlor satisfying closure of the wells on the Subject Property as required by State law; and viii. MMH shall furnish the Certificate of Title of the Subject Property, to the City's title company. Title Examination. Immediately after the execution hereof by City, City shall order a commitment for an ALTA owner's policy of title insurance with extended coverage (Form B-1970) from a title company selected by City in an amount of the purchase price, committing to insure that City will have good and marketable title to the Subject Property on the date of Closing free and clear of any liens and exceptions to title except for permitted encumbrances and without any exceptions for liens of labor or materials, rights of parties in possession, easements or claims of easements now shown by public records, and taxes and special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by pubic records. City may require the title company to include such affirmative coverage, including access, contiguity, subdivision compliance and zoning endorsements, as City may, in its sole discretion, require, and MMH agrees to cooperate with City in obtaining such writings as may reasonably and customarily be required by title company as a condition to its issuing such endorsements without cost or expense to the donor. City shall be responsible for any premiums or charges by title for the insurance of a title policy and all endorsements. Title to the Subject Property shall be subject to City's approval and all objections to the status of title shall be delivered to MMH in writing within fifteen (15) days of City's receipt of the title commitment. MMH shall correct all such objections within one hundred twenty (120) days of receipt of City's written objections to City's satisfaction, it being understood that marketable fee title (subject to the permitted encumbrances) and not insurable title to the Subject Property is to be conveyed by MMH to City. If title to the Subject Property is not marketable and is not made so by MMH within one hundred and twenty (120) days from receipt of City's objections thereto, City or MMH may void this Agreement without further cost or expense to MMH. Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, MMH further agrees to use all reasonable efforts and to expend sums as may be reasonably necessary to cure all exceptions raised in the title commitment attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pending correction of title, the date of Closing hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within ten (10) days after written notice to City, the City and MMH shall perform this Agreement according to its terms. In addition, City's obligations shall be contingent upon receipt at Closing of an endorsement to the commitment or a marked copy of the commitment signed by the Closing officer of the title company (a) changing the effective date thereof to the date of Closing, (b) affirmatively insuring against changes in the status of the title from the effective date to the date of recording the deed, (c) deleting all standard exceptions to the policy, (d) affirmatively insuring the matters requested by City as contemplated above, and (e) reflecting City as the fee owner of the Subject Property and without any other change. Taxes. Real estate taxes due and payable in connection with the Subject Property for all prior years shall be paid by MMH. Real estate taxes, excluding penalties and plus interest, if any, due and payable in the year in which Closing date occurs (the "Year of Closing") shall be prorated as follows: MMH's portion of the real estate taxes for the Subject Property net of all assessments shall be determined by dividing Ramsey County's estimated market value of the land only by Ramsey County's total estimated value of the land and buildings ("value"). This value shall then be multiplied by the net real estate taxes on the Subj ect Property. This amount shall then be multiplied by the percentage of the total Property that the City is purchasing. This amount shall then be prorated as of the date of closing. This amount shall be MMH's responsibility for real estate taxes on the Subject Property. All levied or pending assessments shall be allocated to the balance of MMH's property. The City shall approve any necessary lot split arising out of this Agreement. Representations and Warranties by MMH. MMH represents and warrants to City that: a. MMH have all requisite power and authority to execute this Purchase Agreement and the Closing documents previously listed hereof, and the officers of MMH who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of MMH have the power and the authority to do so and to bind MMH. MMH have not used the Subject Property and, to the best of MMH's knowledge the Subject Property have never been used for the production, storage, deposit or disposal of toxic, dangerous or hazardous substance pollutants, wastes or contaminations, including but not limited to nuclear fuel or wastes or wastes that are considered hazardous by law and regulations, and to the best of MMH's knowledge and belief, no such substances, pollutants, wastes or contaminants exist on the Subject Property. To the best of MMH's knowledge and belief, there are no underground storage tanks on or under the Subject Property. MMH agree to cooperate fully with the City's Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Subject Property, which includes, but is not limited to allowing City and City's agents and employees on the Subject Property in order to perform testing operations. c. MMH have and will have, on the date of Closing, good and marketable title be in fee simple to the Subject Property free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever, except for such matters, if any, to which City, at its option, may consent to in writing, and except for permitted encumbrances. d. To the best of the knowledge of MMH after due investigation, there exists no j udgment, lien, suit, action or legal or administrative arbitration or other proceeding affecting the Subject Property pending or, to the best of MMH's knowledge and belief, threatened against MMH which could result in a judgment or lien against MMH; there exists no other basis for any assertion against MMH which would interfere with or prevent the transactions contemplated hereby. MMH hereby agrees that the truthfulness of each of the foregoing representations and warranties and of all other representations and warranties herein made is a condition precedent to the performance by City of its obligations hereunder. The representations contained herein shall survive Closing hereunder. The other representations shall survive only to the extent that the matter represented is to constitute a lien or charge against the Subject Property. Upon the material breach of any thereof, City may declare this Purchase Agreement to be null and void, or City may elect to close this sale without waiving any right of action by reason of such breach. In the event City elects to declare this Agreement null and void pursuant to this paragraph, all earnest money, additional earnest money paid and accrued interest thereon shall be refunded to City. Representations and Warranties by City. City represents and warrants to MMH that: City has all requisite power and authority to execute and perform this Purchase Agreement, and the officers of City who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of City have the power and authority to do so and to bind City. ii. City will execute reasonably and exercise due diligence in the performance of the acts permitted or required under this Purchase Agreement. Eminent Domain. If, prior to Closing, the Subject Property or any part thereof shall be taken by eminent domain or if proceedings therefore are commenced or threatened, this purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at City's option. 10. Termination. If MMH shall fail to perform their obligations hereunder or shall otherwise breach this Agreement, or if any representation or warranty of MMH set forth in this Agreement hereof shall not be true and accurate as of the date stated and as of the date of Closing, City shall have the option to do one or more of the following: (a) terminate this Agreement by written notice to MMH, (b) proceed to Closing, (c) in the case of MMH's failure to cure objections to title, as required in this Agreement, proceed to Closing and submit to MMH for payment the reasonable cost of City's curing such objections from the purchase price; or (d) pursue such other actions or remedies as are available to it including its right to damages against MMH for their failure to perform or for such breach or misrepresentation or the right to specific performance of this Agreement. Upon the receipt of written notice terminating this Purchase Agreement, this Purchase Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect and all liability of the parties hereto to each other shall be discharged. If City shall default in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder, then MMH's sole remedy shall be to terminate this Agreement. 11. Miscellaneous. a. Notices. Any notice or other communication which must or may be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing, and shall be given by personal service or dispatched by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses shown below, or such other address of which notice is provided in accordance with the terms of this Paragraph 11: i. If to City: Mr. Charles Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 With a copy to: Patrick J. Kelly, Esq. Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. 2350 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 ii. If to MMH: With a copy to: Joel A. Seltz, Esq. Seltz & Seltz PLLP 6601 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 iii. Properly addressed written notice delivered personally, by messenger or courier service, with fees prepaid, by facsimile shall be deemed given on the date of receipt by addressee. iv. Properly addressed written notice delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, shall be deemed given on the date which falls seven business days after its deposit in the United States mail. b. Interpretation. This Purchase Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties. It may be amended or modified only in a writing signed by MMH and City. This Purchase Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. c. Assi ng menu. The City reserves the right to assign its rights and interests in this Agreement to any other governmental entity. d. Time. Time shall be of the essence hereof. e. Public Announcement. MMH agrees that they will not make a public announcement of this transaction contemplated hereby or the terms hereof prior to Closing without the prior written consent of the City. 12. Contingencies. City's obligation under this Agreement shall be conditioned, for the sole benefit of the City, upon the following: a. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Attorney; b. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Council; c. Contingent upon the successful closing on the purchase of all of the properties by the City of Maplewood listed in attached Exhibit B. d. Contingent upon a survey that is satisfactory to the City; e. Contingent upon the completion of a Phase II Environmental Assessment at the expense of City that is satisfactory to the City; and £ MMH agrees to expressly waive all relocation expenses and issues. If these contingencies are not satisfied, then this Agreement may be declared null and void by City. The City reserves the right to waive any one of these contingencies. 13. Waiver. MMH agrees to waive any objection to the City's granting to KAMI, Inc. or Venburg Tire a 350 foot setback variance with respect to the Venburg Tire development. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Purchase Agreement. MMH: By By City: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ---- By---------- Date Its: Mayor Date By Its: City Manager Date Date AGREEMENT TO CONVEY THIS AGREEMENT is made on this day of December, 2004, by the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and M & M Partnership of Minnesota, LLP, a limited liability partnership in the State of Minnesota ("M & M"). B. M & M are the owners of the property, known as 2911 Maplewood Drive, legally described as: The east 723.40 feet of the north 220 feet of the south 473 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 61; except the west 115 feet of the south 97 feet thereof. B. M & M desires to convey the following described portion of their property described in Paragraph A to the City: All that part of the above described property lying westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 526.00 feet westerly from the east line of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota and which lies northerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 190.00 feet southerly from the northerly line of said south 473 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota ("Subject Property"). City desires to obtain the property on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receiving adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, M & M and City agree as follows: 4. Sale and Purchase. Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, M & M hereby conveys to City and City hereby receives that real property located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, as more particularly described above in Paragraph B, together with the right, title and interest of M & M in and to any overlaps or gaps between the respective parcels of real property described in Paragraph B. It is understood that this Agreement is to be executed in conjunction with the other Agreements for the land contiguous to the land being sold herein to the City (copies of which are attached hereto for reference). It is a condition precedent to this Agreement that the other Agreements shall be closed or none of them shall close. In addition, if the City is in default under the terms of any of the Agreements, then the City shall automatically be in default under all of the Agreements. Consideration. Subject to the performance by M & M on all of their obligations hereunder and satisfaction or waiver by City of all contingencies set forth in subsequent paragraphs hereof, the following shall be the consideration for City's purchase of the Subject Property from M & M. The City shall allow M & M to utilize the area of the property conveyed to the City as a part of this Agreement to meet its green space requirements for existing and future development on the remaining property described in Paragraph A of this Agreement. Closing Date. The Closing of this purchase and sale shall take place at the Maplewood City Hall on or before December 31, 2004, unless extended pursuant to agreement of the parties. Possession of the Subj ect Property shall be delivered to the City on the date of Closing. M & M and City shall equally split the costs of Closing. Closing costs shall not exceed $500.00. 4. Documents to be Delivered. a. To the extent not heretofore delivered to City, within ten (10) days after the date hereof, M & M shall deliver to City copies of all soil tests and reports, engineering studies and reports, environmental tests and reports, surveys, plats, topographical information, utility service information, correspondence with utility companies, highway departments, transportation officials and town, county or state governmental entities, contracts and agreements affecting the Subject Property, to the extent such documents are in their possession or control; b. If City has performed all of its obligations hereunder to the date of Closing, M & M shall, on the date of Closing, execute, where necessary, and deliver to City the following: Warranty Deeds from M & M to City free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encroachments, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever; ii. Uniform Seller's Affidavits from M & M indicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens, or bankruptcies against or involving M & M and that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Subject Property for which mechanic's liens could be filed; there are no other unrecorded interests in the Subject Property of any kind, including but not limited to any leasehold interests in the Subject Property; iii. All other documents to be executed by M & M affecting title to andlor possession of the Subject Property and necessary or convenient to transfer the same to City under Minnesota law or practice, free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances; iv. M & M shall pay the state deed tax and conservation taxes payable upon recording the above deeds. M & M is responsible for all outstanding and payment in full of assessments levied and pending. City is responsible for recording fees on any documents, other than deeds required by City to be recorded; Execute and deliver to City and City's title insurer, if any, an appropriate Minnesota Uniform Conveyance Form Affidavit (Form 116-M, 117-M or 188-MO evidencing the absence of bankruptcies, judgments, or tax liens involving parties with the same or similar names as M & M and evidencing the absence of mechanic's lien rights affecting the Subject Property, unrecorded interests affecting the Subject Property, persons in possession of the Subject Property and known encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Subject Property; vi. Execute and deliver to City anon-foreign affidavit in recordable form containing such information as is required under Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and any regulations relating thereto; vii. Execute and deliver to the Closing agent, with a copy to City, a completed Minnesota Department of Health Well Disclosure Certificate or include on the deed "M & M certify that they do not know of any wells on the described real property" or the statement "We are familiar with the property described in this instrument and we certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate; ' followed by M & M's signature. If there are wells on the Subject Property, M & M are responsible for capping andlor satisfying closure of the wells on the Subject Property as required by State law; and viii. M & M shall furnish the Certificate of Title of the Subject Property, to the City's title company. Title Examination. Immediately after the execution hereof by City, City shall order a commitment for an ALTA owner's policy of title insurance with extended coverage (Form B-1970) from a title company selected by City in an amount of the purchase price, committing to insure that City will have good and marketable title to the Subject Property on the date of Closing free and clear of any liens and exceptions to title except for permitted encumbrances and without any exceptions for liens of labor or materials, rights of parties in possession, easements or claims of easements now shown by public records, and taxes and special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by pubic records. City may require the title company to include such affirmative coverage, including access, contiguity, subdivision compliance and zoning endorsements, as City may, in its sole discretion, require, and M & M agrees to cooperate with City in obtaining such writings as may reasonably and customarily be required by title company as a condition to its issuing such endorsements without cost or expense to the donor. City shall be responsible for any premiums or charges by title for the insurance of a title policy and all endorsements. Title to the Subject Property shall be subject to City's approval and all objections to the status of title shall be delivered to M & M in writing within fifteen (15) days of City's receipt of the title commitment. M & M shall correct all such objections within one hundred twenty (120) days of receipt of City's written objections to City's satisfaction, it being understood that marketable fee title (subject to the permitted encumbrances) and not insurable title to the Subject Property is to be conveyed by M & M to City. If title to the Subject Property is not marketable and is not made so by M & M within one hundred and twenty (120) days from receipt of City's objections thereto, City or M & M may void this Agreement without further cost or expense to M & M. Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, M & M further agrees to use all reasonable efforts and to expend sums as may be reasonably necessary to cure all exceptions raised in the title commitment attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pending correction of title, the date of Closing hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within ten (10) days after written notice to City, the City and M & M shall perform this Agreement according to its terms. In addition, City's obligations shall be contingent upon receipt at Closing of an endorsement to the commitment or a marked copy of the commitment signed by the Closing officer of the title company (a) changing the effective date thereof to the date of Closing, (b) affirmatively insuring against changes in the status of the title from the effective date to the date of recording the deed, (c) deleting all standard exceptions to the policy, (d) affirmatively insuring the matters requested by City as contemplated above, and (e) reflecting City as the fee owner of the Subject Property and without any other change. Taxes. Real estate taxes due and payable in connection with the Subject Property for all prior years shall be paid by M & M. Real estate taxes, excluding penalties and plus interest, if any, due and payable in the year in which Closing date occurs (the "Year of Closing") shall be prorated as follows: M & M's portion of the real estate taxes for the Subject Property net of all assessments shall be determined by dividing Ramsey County's estimated market value of the land only by Ramsey County's total estimated value of the land and buildings ("value"). This value shall then be multiplied by the net real estate taxes on the Subj ect Property. This amount shall then be multiplied by the percentage of the total Property that the City is purchasing. This amount shall then be prorated as of the date of closing. This amount shall be M & M's responsibility for real estate taxes on the Subject Property. All levied or pending assessments shall be allocated to the balance of M & M's property. The City shall approve any necessary lot split arising out of this Agreement. Representations and Warranties by M & M. M & M represents and warrants to City that: a. M & M have all requisite power and authority to execute this Purchase Agreement and the Closing documents previously listed hereof, and the officers of M & M who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of M & M have the power and the authority to do so and to bind M & M. M & M have not used the Subject Property and, to the best of M & M's knowledge the Subject Property have never been used for the production, storage, deposit or disposal of toxic, dangerous or hazardous substance pollutants, wastes or contaminations, including but not limited to nuclear fuel or wastes or wastes that are considered hazardous by law and regulations, and to the best of M & M's knowledge and belief, no such substances, pollutants, wastes or contaminants exist on the Subject Property. To the best of M & M's knowledge and belief, there are no underground storage tanks on or under the Subject Property. M & M agree to cooperate fully with the City's Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Subject Property, which includes, but is not limited to allowing City and City's agents and employees on the Subject Property in order to perform testing operations. c. M & M have and will have, on the date of Closing, good and marketable title be in fee simple to the Subject Property free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever, except for such matters, if any, to which City, at its option, may consent to in writing, and except for permitted encumbrances. d. To the best of the knowledge of M & M after due investigation, there exists no j udgment, lien, suit, action or legal or administrative arbitration or other proceeding affecting the Subject Property pending or, to the best of M & M's knowledge and belief, threatened against M & M which could result in a judgment or lien against M & M; there exists no other basis for any assertion against M & M which would interfere with or prevent the transactions contemplated hereby. M & M hereby agrees that the truthfulness of each of the foregoing representations and warranties and of all other representations and warranties herein made is a condition precedent to the performance by City of its obligations hereunder. The representations contained herein shall survive Closing hereunder. The other representations shall survive only to the extent that the matter represented is to constitute a lien or charge against the Subject Property. Upon the material breach of any thereof, City may declare this Purchase Agreement to be null and void, or City may elect to close this sale without waiving any right of action by reason of such breach. In the event City elects to declare this Agreement null and void pursuant to this paragraph, all earnest money, additional earnest money paid and accrued interest thereon shall be refunded to City. Representations and Warranties by City. City represents and warrants to M & M that: City has all requisite power and authority to execute and perform this Purchase Agreement, and the officers of City who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of City have the power and authority to do so and to bind City. ii. City will exec ute reasonably and exercise due diligence in the performance of the acts permitted or required under this Purchase Agreement. Eminent Domain. If, prior to Closing, the Subject Property or any part thereof shall be taken by eminent domain or if proceedings therefore are commenced or threatened, this purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at City's option. 10. Termination. If M & M shall fail to perform their obligations hereunder or shall otherwise breach this Agreement, or if any representation or warranty of M & M set forth in this Agreement hereof shall not be true and acc urate as of the date stated and as of the date of Closing, City shall have the option to do one or more of the following: (a) terminate this Agreement by written notice to M & M, (b) proceed to Closing, (c) in the case of M & M's failure to cure objections to title, as required in this Agreement, proceed to Closing and submit to M & M for payment the reasonable cost of City's curing such objections from the purchase price; or (d) pursue such other actions or remedies as are available to it including its right to damages against M & M for their failure to perform or for such breach or misrepresentation ortheright to specific performance of this Agreement. Upon the receipt of written notice terminating this Purchase Agreement, this Purchase Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect and all liability of the parties hereto to each other shall be discharged. If City shall default in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder, then M & M's sole remedy shall be to terminate this Agreement. 11. Miscellaneous. a. Notices. Any notice or other communication which must or may be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing, and shall be given by personal service or dispatched by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses shown below, or such other address of which notice is provided in accordance with the terms of this Paragraph 11: j. If to City: Mr. Charles Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 With a copy to: Patrick J. Kelly, Esq. Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. 2350 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 ii. If to M & M: With a copy to: Joel A. Seltz, Esq. Seltz & Seltz PLLP 6601 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 iii. Properly addressed written notice delivered personally, by messenger or courier service, with fees prepaid, by facsimile shall be deemed given on the date of receipt by addressee. iv. Properly addressed written notice delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, shall be deemed given on the date which falls seven business days after its deposit in the United States mail. b. Interpretation. This Purchase Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties. It may be amended or modified only in a writing signed by M & M and City. This Purchase Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. c. Assignments. The City reserves the right to assign its rights and interests in this Agreement to any other governmental entity. d. Time. Time shall be of the essence hereof. e. Public Announcement. M & M agrees that they will not make a public announcement of this transaction contemplated hereby or the terms hereof prior to Closing without the prior written consent of the City. 12. Contin eg ncies. City's obligation under this Agreement shall be conditioned, for the sole benefit of the City, upon the following: a. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Attorney; b. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Council; c. Contingent upon the successful closing on the purchase of all of the properties by the City of Maplewood listed in attached Exhibit B. d. Contingent upon a survey that is satisfactory to the City; e. Contingent upon the completion of a Phase II Environmental Assessment at the expense of City that is satisfactory to the City; and £ M & M agrees to expressly waive all relocation expenses and issues. If these contingencies are not satisfied, then this Agreement may be declared null and void by City. The City reserves the right to waive any one of these contingencies. 13. Waiver. M & M agrees to waive any objection to the City's granting to KAMI, Inc. or Venburg Tire a 350 foot setback variance with respect to the Venburg Tire development. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Purchase Agreement. M & M: City: By By CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ---- By---------- Date Its: Mayor Date By Its: City Manager Date Date AGREEMENT TO CONVEY THIS AGREEMENT is made on this day of December, 2004, by the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and LAMETTRY PROPERTIES, LLC ("LaMettry Properties"). C. LaMettry Properties are the owners of the property, known as 2923 Maplewood Drive, legally described as: That part of the east 723.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 61 and southerly of the north 686.5 feet thereof and northerly of the south 473 feet thereof; and That part of the north 686.5 feet of the east 723.40 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 61 and southerly of the northerly line of the south 698 feet thereof. D. LaMettry Properties desires to convey the following described portion of their property described in Paragraph A to the City: The west 197.40 feet of the east 723.40 feet of the north 225 feet of the south 698 feet of the said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota ("Subject Property"). City desires to obtain the property on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receiving adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, LaMettry Properties and City agree as follows: Sale and Purchase. Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, LaMettry Properties hereby conveys to City and City hereby receives that real property located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, as more particularly described above in Paragraph B, together with the right, title and interest of Seller in and to any overlaps or gaps between the respective parcels of real property described in Paragraph B. It is understood that this Agreement is to be executed in conjunction with the other Agreements for the land contiguous to the land being sold herein to the City (copies of which are attached hereto for reference). It is a condition precedent to this Agreement that the other Agreements shall be closed or none of them shall close. In addition, if the City is in default under the terms of any of the Agreements, then the City shall automatically be in default under all of the Agreements. Consideration. Subj ect to the performance by LaMettry Properties on all of their obligations hereunder and satisfaction or waiver by City of all contingencies set forth in subsequent paragraphs hereof, the following shall be the consideration for City's purchase of the Subject Property from LaMettry Properties. The City shall allow LaMettry Properties to utilize the area of the property conveyed to the City as a part of this Agreement to meet its green space requirements for existing and future development on the remaining property described in Paragraph A of this Purchase Agreement. 9. ~ _ Closing Date. The Closing of this purchase and sale shall take place at the_ ~eieted: 11 Maplewood City Hall on or before December 31, 2004, unless extended pursuant to agreement of the parties. Possession of the Subj ect Property shall be delivered to the City on the date of Closing. LaMettry Properties and City shall equally split the costs of Closing. Closing costs shall not exceed $500.00. 4. Documents to be Delivered. a. To the extent not heretofore delivered to City, within ten (10) days after the date hereof, LaMettry Properties shall deliver to City copies of all soil tests and reports, engineering studies and reports, environmental tests and reports, surveys, plats, topographical information, utility service information, correspondence with utility companies, highway departments, transportation officials and town, county or state governmental entities, contracts and agreements affecting the Subject Property, to the extent such documents are in their possession or control; If City has performed all of its obligations hereunder to the date of Closing, LaMettry Properties shall, on the date of Closing, execute, where necessary, and deliver to City the following: Warranty Deeds from LaMettry Properties to City free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encroachments, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever; ii. Uniform Seller's Affidavits from LaMettry Propertiesindicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens, or bankruptcies against or involving LaMettry Properties and that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Subject Property for which mechanic's liens could be filed; there are no other unrecorded interests in the Subject Property of any kind, including but not limited to any leasehold interests in the Subject Property; iii. All other documents to be executed by LaMettry Properties affecting title to and/or possession of the Subject Property and necessary or convenient to transfer the same to City under Minnesota law or practice, free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances; iv. LaMettry Properties shall pay the state deed tax and conservation taxes payable upon recording the above deeds. LaMettry Properties is responsible for all outstanding and payment in full of assessments levied and pending. City is responsible for recording fees on any documents, other than deeds required by City to be recorded; Execute and deliver to City and City's title insurer, if any, an appropriate Minnesota Uniform Conveyance Form Affidavit (Form 116-M, 117-M or 188-MO evidencing the absence of bankruptcies, judgments, or tax liens involving parties with the same or similar names as LaMettry Properties and evidencing the absence of mechanic's lien rights affecting the Subject Property, unrecorded interests affecting the Subject Property, persons in possession of the Subject Property and known encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Subject Property; vi. Execute and deliver to City anon-foreign affidavit in recordable form containing such information as is required under Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and any regulations relating thereto; vii. Execute and deliver to the Closing agent, with a copy to City, a completed Minnesota Department of Health Well Disclosure Certificate or include on the deed "LaMettry Propertiescertify that they do not know of any wells on the described real property" or the statement "We are familiar with the property described in this instrument and we certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate;" followed by LaMettry Properties' signature. If there are wells on the Subject Property, LaMettry Properties are responsible for capping andlor satisfying closure ofthe wells on the Subject Property as required by State law; and viii. LaMettry Properties shall furnish the Certificate of Title of the Subject Property, to the City's title company. Title Examination. Immediately after the execution hereof by City, City shall order a commitment for an ALTA owner's policy of title insurance with extended coverage (Form B-1970) from a title company selected by City in an amount of the purchase price, committing to insure that City will have good and marketable title to the Subject Property on the date of Closing free and clear of any liens and exceptions to title except for permitted encumbrances and without any exceptions for liens of labor or materials, rights of parties in possession, easements or claims of easements now shown by public records, and taxes and special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by pubic records. City may require the title company to include such affirmative coverage, including access, contiguity, subdivision compliance and zoning endorsements, as City may, in its sole discretion, require, and LaMettry Properties agrees to cooperate with City in obtaining such writings as may reasonably and customarily be required by title company as a condition to its issuing such endorsements without cost or expense to the donor. City shall be responsible for any premiums or charges by title for the insurance of a title policy and all endorsements. Title to the Subject Property shall be subject to City's approval and all objections to the status of title shall be delivered to LaMettry Properties in writing within fifteen (15) days of City's receipt of the title commitment. LaMettry Properties shall correct all such objections within one hundred twenty (120) days ofreceipt of City's written objections to City's satisfaction, it being understood that marketable fee title (subject to the permitted encumbrances) and not insurable title to the Subject Property is to be conveyed by LaMettry Properties to City. If title to the Subject Property is not marketable and is not made so by LaMettry Properties within one hundred and twenty (120) days from receipt of City's objections thereto, City or LaMettry Properties may void this Agreement without further cost or expense to LaMettry Properties. Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, LaMettry Properties further agrees to use all reasonable efforts and to expend sums as may be reasonably necessary to cure all exceptions raised in the title commitment attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pending correction of title, the date of Closing hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within ten (10) days after written notice to City, the City and LaMettry Properties shall perform this Agreement according to its terms. In addition, City's obligations shall be contingent upon receipt at Closing of an endorsement to the commitment or a marked copy of the commitment signed by the Closing officer of the title company (a) changing the effective date thereof to the date of Closing, (b) affirmatively insuring against changes in the status of the title from the effective date to the date of recording the deed, (c) deleting all standard exceptions to the policy, (d) affirmatively insuring the matters requested by City as contemplated above, and (e) reflecting City as the fee owner of the Subject Property and without any other change. Taxes. Real estate taxes due and payable in connection with the Subject Property for all prior years shall be paid by LaMettry Properties. Real estate taxes, excluding penalties and plus interest, if any, due and payable in the year in which Closing date occurs (the "Year of Closing") shall be prorated as follows: LaMettry Properties portion of the real estate taxes for the Subject Property net of all assessments shall be determined by dividing Ramsey County's estimated market value of the land only by Ramsey County's total estimated value of the land and buildings ("value"). This value shall then be multiplied by the net real estate taxes on the Subj ect Property. This amount shall then be multiplied by the percentage of the total Property that the City is purchasing. This amount shall then be prorated as of the date of closing. This amount shall be LaMettry Properties' responsibility for real estate taxes on the Subject Property. All levied or pending assessments shall be allocated to the balance of LaMettry Properties' property. The City shall approve any necessary lot split arising out of this Agreement. Representations and Warranties by LaMettry Properties. LaMettry Properties represents and warrants to City that: a. LaMettry Properties have all requisite power and authority to execute this Purchase Agreement and the Closing documents previously listed hereof, and the officers of LaMettry Properties who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of LaMettry Properties have the power and the authority to do so and to bind LaMettry Properties. LaMettry Properties have not used the Subject Property and, to the best of LaMettry Properties' knowledge the Subject Property have never been used for the production, storage, deposit or disposal of toxic, dangerous or hazardous substancepollutants, wastes or contaminations, including but not limited to nuclear fuel or wastes or wastes that are considered hazardous by law and regulations, and to the best of LaMettry Properties' knowledge and belief, no such substances, pollutants, wastes or contaminants exist on the Subject Property. To the best of LaMettry Properties' knowledge and belief, there are no underground storage tanks on or under the Subject Property. LaMettry Properties agree to cooperate fully with the City's Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Subject Property, which includes, but is not limited to allowing City and City's agents and employees on the Subject Property in order to perform testing operations. c. LaMettry Properties have and will have, on the date of Closing, good and marketable title be in fee simple to the Subj ect Property free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever, except for such matters, if any, to which City, at its option, may consent to in writing, and except for permitted encumbrances. d. To the best of the knowledge of LaMettry Properties after due investigation, there exists no judgment, lien, suit, action or legal or administrative arbitration or other proceeding affecting the Subject Property pending or, to the best of LaMettry Properties' knowledge and belief, threatened against LaMettry Properties which could result in a judgment or lien against LaMettry Properties; there exists no other basis for any assertion against LaMettry Properties which would interfere with or prevent the transactions contemplated hereby. LaMettry Properties hereby agrees that the truthfulness of each of the foregoing representations and warranties and of all other representations and warranties herein made is a condition precedent to the performance by City of its obligations hereunder. The representations contained herein shall survive Closing hereunder. The other representations shall survive only to the extent that the matter represented is to constitute a lien or charge against the Subject Property. Upon the material breach of any thereof, City may declare this Purchase Agreement to be null and void, or City may elect to close this sale without waiving any right of action by reason of such breach. In the event City elects to declare this Agreement null and void pursuant to this paragraph, all earnest money, additional earnest money paid and accrued interest thereon shall be refunded to City. Representations and Warranties by CitX. City represents and warrants to LaMettry Properties that: City has all requisite power and authority to execute and perform this Purchase Agreement, and the officers of City who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of City have the power and authority to do so and to bind City. ii. City will exec ute reasonably and exercise due diligence in the performance of the acts permitted or required under this Purchase Agreement. Eminent Domain. If, prior to Closing, the Subject Property or any part thereof shall be taken by eminent domain or if proceedings therefore are commenced or threatened, this purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at City's option. 10. Termination. If LaMettry Properties shall fail to perform their obligations hereunder or shall otherwise breach this Agreement, or if any representation or warranty of LaMettry Properties set forth in this Agreement hereof shall not be true and accurate as of the date stated and as of the date of Closing, City shall have the option to do one or more of the following: (a) terminate this Agreement by written notice to LaMettry Properties, (b) proceed to Closing, (c) in the case of LaMettry Properties' failure to cure objections to title, as required in this Agreement, proceed to Closing and submit to LaMettry Propertiesfor payment the reasonable cost of City's curing such objections from the purchase price; or (d) pursue such other actions or remedies as are available to it including its right to damages against LaMettry Properties for their failure to perform or for such breach or misrepresentation or the right to specific performance of this Agreement. Upon the receipt of written notice terminating this Purchase Agreement, this Purchase Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect and all liability of the parties hereto to each other shall be discharged. If City shall default in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder, then LaMettry Properties' sole remedy shall be to terminate this Agreement. 11. Miscellaneous. a. Notices. Any notice or other communication which must or may be given under the terms of this Agreement must be in writing, and shall be given by personal service or dispatched by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses shown below, or such other address of which notice is provided in accordance with the terms of this Paragraph 11: k. If to City: Mr. Charles Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 With a copy to: Patrick J. Kelly, Esq. Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. 2350 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 ii. If to LaMettry Properties: Richard A. and Joanne M. LaMettry LaMettry Properties, LLC 6861 Beach Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 With a copy to: Joel A. Seltz, Esq. Seltz & Seltz PLLP 6601 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 iii. Properly addressed written notice delivered personally, by messenger or courier service, with fees prepaid, by facsimile shall be deemed given on the date of receipt by addressee. iv. Properly addressed written notice delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, shall be deemed given on the date which falls seven business days after its deposit in the United States mail. b. Interpretation. This Purchase Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties. It may be amended or modified only in a writing signed by LaMettry Properties and City. This Purchase Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. c. Assignments. The City reserves the right to assign its rights and interests in this Agreement to any other governmental entity. d. Time. Time shall be of the essence hereof. e. Public Announcement. LaMettry Properties agrees that they will notmake a public announcement of this transaction contemplated hereby or the terms hereof prior to Closing without the prior written consent of the City. 12. Contin eg ncies. City's obligation under this Agreement shall be conditioned, for the sole benefit of the City, upon the following: a. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Attorney; b. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Council; c. Contingent upon the successful closing on the purchase of all of the properties by the City of Maplewood listed in attached Exhibit B. d. Contingent upon a survey that is satisfactory to the City; e. Contingent upon the completion of a Phase II Environmental Assessment at the expense of City that is satisfactory to the City; and £ LaMettry Properties agrees to expressly waive all relocation expenses and issues. If these contingencies are not satisfied, then this Agreement may be declared null and void by City. The City reserves the right to waive any one of these contingencies. 13. Waiver. LaMettry Properties agrees to waive any objection to the City's granting to KAMI, Inc. or Venburg Tire a 350 foot setback variance with respect to the Venburg Tire development. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Purchase Agreement. LaMettry Properties: City: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By By By Date Its: Mayor Date By Its: City Manager Date Date PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made on this day of December, 2004, by the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Buyer") and LMCD Properties of Minnesota, LLP, a limited liability partnership in the State of Minnesota ("Seller"). A. Seller is the owner of the property legally described as: That part of the east 723.40 feet lying north of the south 698 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of State Highway No. 61, except the north 409.5 feet of the east 500 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4. B. Seller desires to sell the following described portion of its property described in Paragraph A to the Buyer: That part of the westerly 197.4 feet of the east 723 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying southerly of the northerly 469.5 feet and which lies northerly of the southerly 698 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 4. Seller agrees to convey a public drainage and utility easement over the following described property to Buyer: The east 723.4 feet of the north 698 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota lying westerly of the westerly right of way line of Trunk Highway No. 61; EXCEPT the north 409.5 feet of the east 500 feet of the South Half of the said Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Said permanent easement is a strip of land 20.00 feet wide, the center line of said strip being described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said north 409.5 feet of the east 500 feet of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 46 minutes 53 seconds East along the southerly line of said north 409.5 feet of the east 500 feet of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, for 4.80 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 34 degrees 35 minutes 20 seconds West for 136.61 feet and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said strip are to be prolonged or shortened to begin along the northerly and westerly lines of said north 409.5 feet of the east 500 feet of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4. ("Subject Property"). Buyer desires to buy the property and easement on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receiving adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Buyer agree as follows: Sale and Purchase. Subject to the terms and conditions herein set forth, Seller hereby sells to B uyer and Buyer hereby purchases that real property located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, as more particularly described above in Paragraph B, together with the right, title and interest of Seller in and to any overlaps or gaps between the respective parcels of real property described in Paragraph B. It is understood that this Agreement is to be executed in conjunction with the other Agreements for the land contiguous to the land being sold herein to the City (copies of which are attached hereto for reference). It is a condition precedent to this Agreement that the other Agreements shall be closed or none of them shall close. In addition, if the City is in default under the terms of any of the Agreements, then the City shall automatically be in default under all of the Agreements. Purchase Price. Subject to the performance by Seller on all of its obligations hereunder and satisfaction or waiver by Buyer of all contingencies set forth in subsequent paragraphs hereof, Buyer shallpay Seller the sum of $168,000.00 for Buyer's purchase of the Subject Property and easements from Seller, payable as follows: a. A payment of $500.00 earnest money upon execution of this Purchase Agreement. Said earnest money shall be held in escrow by Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. Said earnest money shall be returned by Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. to B uyer if Seller does not execute or return this Purchase Agreement to B uyer within five (5) days after the date for above-written and as otherwise set forth herein. Unless refunded to the Buyer as provided, the escrow money shall be delivered to the Seller at Closing. All accrued interest on the earnest money and any additional earnest money paid pursuant to agreements hereof shall be for the benefit of the party entitled to the earnest money and any such additional earnest money, whether or not the Closing occurs hereunder. b. Additional Consideration. The following shall be the additional consideration for Buyer's purchase of the Subject Property from Seller and the Seller's grant of a drainage and utility easement and a temporary construction easement to Buyer: The Buyer shall allow the Seller to utilize the area of the property sold as a part of this Agreement of Sale to meet its green space requirements for existing and future development on the remaining property described in Paragraph A of this Purchase Agreement. The Buyer shall construct a frontage road along the west side of TH 61 for the benefit and use by Seller. The frontage road construction will include the removal of the two existing driveway connections to TH 61 and the construction of one new driveway connection as detailed in the attached Exhibit A. Closing Date. The Closing of this purchase and sale shall take place at the Maplewood City Hall on or before December 31, 2004, unless extended pursuant to agreement of the parties. Possession of the Subject Property shall be delivered to the B uyer on the date of Closing. Seller and Buyer shall equally split the costs of Closing. Closing costs shall not exceed $500.00. 4. Documents to be Delivered. a. To the extent not heretofore delivered to Buyer, within ten (10) days after the date hereof, Seller shall deliver to Buyer copies of all soil tests and reports, engineering studies and reports, environmental tests and reports, surveys, plats, topographical information, utility service information, correspondence with utility companies, highway departments, transportation officials and town, county or state governmental entities, contracts and agreements affecting the Subject Property, to the extent such documents are in its possession or control; b. If Buyer has performed all of its obligations hereunder to the date of Closing, the Seller shall, on the date of Closing, execute, where necessary, and deliver to Buyer the following: Warranty Deeds from Seller to Buyer free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encroachments, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever; ii. Uniform Seller's Affidavits from Seller indicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens, or bankruptcies against or involving Seller and that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Subject Property for which mechanic's liens could be filed; there are no other unrecorded interests in the Subject Property of any kind, including but not limited to any leasehold interests in the Subject Property; iii. All other documents to be executed by Seller affecting title to andlor possession of the Subject Property and necessary or convenient to transfer the same to Buyer under Minnesota law or practice, free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances; iv. Seller shall pay the state deed tax and conservation taxes payable upon recording the above deeds. Seller is responsible for all outstanding and payment in full of assessments levied and pending. Buyer is responsible for recording fees on any documents, other than deeds required by Buyer to be recorded; Execute and deliver to Buyer and Buyer's title insurer, if any, an appropriate Minnesota Uniform Conveyance Form Affidavit (Form 116-M, 117-M or 188-MO evidencing the absence of bankruptcies,judgments, or tax liens involving parties with the same or similar names as the Seller and evidencing the absence of mechanic's lien rights affecting the Subject Property, unrecorded interests affecting the Subject Property, persons in possession of the Subject Property and known encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Subject Property; vi. Execute and deliver to Buyer anon-foreign affidavit in recordable form containing such information as is required under Internal Revenue Code Section 1445(b)(2) and any regulations relating thereto; vii. Execute and deliver to the Closing agent, with a copy to Buyer, a completed Minnesota Department of Health Well Disclosure Certificate or include on the deed "The Seller certifies that it does not know of any wells on the described real property" or the statement "Seller is familiar with the property described in this instrument and Seller certifies that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate; ' followed by Seller's signature. If there are wells on the Subject Property, the Seller is responsible for capping andlor satisfying closure of the wells on the Subject Property as required by State law; and viii. Seller shall furnish the Certificate of Title of the Subject Property, to the Buyer's title company. Title Examination. Immediately after the execution hereof by Buyer, Buyer shall order a commitment for an ALTA owner's policy of title insurance with extended coverage (Form B-1970) from a title company selected by Buyer in an amount of the purchase price, committing to insure that Buyer will have good and marketable title to the Subject Property on the date of Closing free and clear of any liens and exceptions to title except for permitted encumbrances and without any exceptions for liens of labor or materials, rights of parties in possession, easements or claims of easements now shown by public records, and taxes and special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by pubic records. Buyer may require the title company to include such affirmative coverage, including access, contiguity, subdivision compliance and zoning endorsements, as Buyer may, in its sole discretion, require, and Seller agrees to cooperate with Buyer in obtaining such writings as may reasonably and customarily be required by title company as a condition to its issuing such endorsements without cost or expense to the Seller. Buyer shall be responsible for any premiums or charges by title for the insurance of a title policy and all endorsements. Title to the Subject Property shall be subject to Buyer's approval and all objections to the status of title shall be delivered to Seller in writing within fifteen (15) days of the Buyer's receipt of the title commitment. Seller shall correct all such objections within one hundred twenty days (120) of receipt of Buyer's written objections to Buyer's satisfaction, it being understood that marketable fee title (subject to the permitted encumbrances) and not insurable title to the Subject Property is to be conveyed by Seller to Buyer. If title to the Subject Property is not marketable and is not made so by Seller within one hundred and twenty (120) days from receipt of Buyer's objections thereto, Buyer or Seller may void this Purchase Agreement without further cost or expense to Seller. Notwithstanding the foregoing to the contrary, Seller further agrees to use all reasonable efforts and to expend sums as may be reasonably necessary to cure all exceptions raised in the title commitment attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pending correction of title, the date of Closing hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within ten (10) days after written notice to Buyer, the Buyer and Seller shall perform this Purchase Agreement according to its terms. In addition, Buyer's obligations shall be contingent upon receipt at Closing of an endorsement to the commitment or a marked copy of the commitment signed by the Closing officer of the title company (a) changing the effective date thereof to the date of Closing, (b) affirmatively insuring against changes in the status of the title from the effective date to the date of recording the deed, (c) deleting all standard exceptions to the policy, (d) affirmatively insuring the matters requested by Buyer as contemplated above, and (e) reflecting Buyer as the fee owner of the Subject Property and without any other change. Taxes. Real estate taxes due and payable in connection with the Subject Property for all prior years shall be paid by Seller. Real estate taxes, excluding penalties and plus interest, if any, due and payable in the year in which Closing date occurs (the "Year of Closing") shall be prorated as follows: The Sellers portion of the real estate taxes for the Subject Property net of all assessments shall be determined by dividing Ramsey County's estimated market value of the land only by Ramsey County's total estimated value of the land and buildings ("value"). This value shall then be multiplied by the net real estate taxes on the Subject Property. This amount shall then be multiplied by the percentage of the total Property that the Seller is purchasing. This amount shall then be prorated as of the date of closing. This amount shall be the Seller's responsibility for real estate taxes on the Subject Property. All levied or pending assessments shall be allocated to the balance of the Seller's property. The City shall approve any necessary lot split arising out of this Agreement. that: Representations and Warranties by Seller. Seller represents and warrants to Buyer a. Seller has all requisite power and authority to execute this Purchase Agreement and the Closing documents previously listed hereof, and the officers of the Seller who did or will execute the same for an on behalf of the Seller have the power and the authority to do so and to bind the Seller. Seller has not used the Subject Property and, to the best of Seller's knowledge the Subject Property have never been used for the production, storage, deposit or disposal of toxic, dangerous or hazardous substance pollutants, wastes or contaminations, including but not limited to nuclear fuel or wastes or wastes that are considered hazardous by law and regulations, and to the best of Seller's knowledge and belief, no such substances, pollutants, wastes or contaminants exist on the Subject Property. To the best of Seller's knowledge and belief, there are no underground storage tanks on or under the Subject Property. Seller agrees to cooperate fully with the Buyer's Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Subject Property, which includes, but is not limited to allowing Buyer and Buyer's agents and employees on the Subject Property in order to perform testing operations. c. Seller has and will have, on the date of Closing, good and marketable title be in fee simple to the Subject Property free and clear of all liabilities, liens, leases, encumbrances, assessments, obligations, charges and options of any kind whatsoever, except for such matters, if any, to which Buyer, at its option, may consent to in writing, and except for permitted encumbrances. d. To the best of the knowledge of the Seller after due investigation, there exists no judgment, lien, suit, action or legal or administrative arbitration or other proceeding affecting the Subject Property pending or, to the best of Seller's knowledge and belief, threatened against the Seller which would result in a judgment or lien against the Seller; there exists no other basis for any assertion against Seller which would interfere with or prevent the transactions contemplated hereby. Seller hereby agrees that the truthfulness of each of the foregoing representations and warranties and of all other representations and warranties herein made is a condition precedent to the performance by Buyer of its obligations hereunder. The representations contained herein shall survive Closing hereunder. The other representations shall survive only to the extent that the matter represented is to constitute a lien or charge against the Subject Property. Upon the material breach of any thereof, B uyer may declare this Purchase Agreement to be null and void, or Buyer may elect to close this sale without waiving any right of action by reason of such breach. In the event Buyer elects to declare this Agreement null and void pursuant to this paragraph, all earnest money, additional earnest money paid and accrued interest thereon shall be refunded to Buyer. Representations and Warranties by Buyer. Buyer represents and warrants to Seller that: Buyer has all requisite power and authority to execute and perform this Purchase Agreement, and the officers of Buyer who did or will execute the same for and on behalf of Buyer have the power and authority to do so and to bind Buyer. ii. Buyer will execute reasonably and exercise due diligence in the performance of the acts permitted or required under this Purchase Agreement. Eminent Domain. If, prior to Closing, the Subject Property or any part thereof shall be taken by eminent domain or if proceedings therefore are commenced or threatened, this purchase Agreement shall become null and void, at Buyer's option. 10. Termination. If Seller shall fail to perform its obligations hereunder or shall otherwise breach this Purchase Agreement, or if any representation or warranty of Seller set forth in this Agreement hereof shall not be true and accurate as of the date stated and as of the date of Closing, Buyer shall have the option to do one or more of the following: (a) terminate this Purchase Agreement by written notice to Seller, (b) proceed to Closing, (c) in the case of Seller's failure to cure objections to title, as required in this Agreement, proceed to Closing and submit to Seller for payment the reasonable cost of Buyer's curing such objections from the purchase price; or (d) pursue such other actions or remedies as are available to it including its right to damages against Seller for its failure to perform or for such breach or misrepresentation or the right to specific performance of this Purchase Agreement. Upon the receipt of written notice terminating this Purchase Agreement, this Purchase Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect and all liability of the parties hereto to each other shall be discharged. If Buyer shall default in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder, then Seller's sole remedy shall be to terminate this Purchase Agreement. 11. Miscellaneous. a. Notices. Any notice or other communication which must or may be given under the terms of this Purchase Agreement must be in writing, and shall be given by personal service or dispatched by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses shown below, or such other address of which notice is provided in accordance with the terms of this Paragraph 11: If to Buyer: Mr. Charles Ahl Director of Public Works City of Maplewood 1902 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 With a copy to: Patrick J. Kelly, Esq. Kelly & Fawcett, P.A. 2350 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 ii. If to Seller: LMCD Properties of Minnesota, LLP Attention: With a copy to: Joel A. Seltz, Esq. Seltz & Seltz PLLP 6601 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 iii. Properly addressed written notice delivered personally, by messenger or courier service, with fees prepaid, by facsimile shall be deemed given on the date of receipt by addressee. iv. Properly addressed written notice delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, shall be deemed given on the date which falls seven business days after its deposit in the United States mail. b. Interpretation. This Purchase Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties. It may be amended or modified only in a writing signed by Seller and Buyer. This Purchase Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. c. Assi ng menu. The City reserves its rights to assign its rights and interests in this Agreement to any other governmental entity. d. Time. Time shall be of the essence hereof. e. Public Announcement. Seller agrees that it will not make a public announcement of this transaction contemplated hereby or the terms hereof prior to Closing without the prior written consent of the Buyer. 12. Contingencies. Buyer's obligation under this Agreement shall be conditioned, for the sole benefit of the Buyer, upon the following: a. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Attorney; b. Contingent upon review and approval by the City Council; c. Contingent upon the successful closing on the purchase of all of the properties by the City of Maplewood listed in attached Exhibit B; d. -Contingent upon Seller successfully the property described in attached Exhibit C with Trout Land, LLC; e. Contingent upon a survey that is that is satisfactory to the Buyer; ®- Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.93", First line: 0", Tabs: Not at 0.5" + 1" + 1.5" + 2" £ Contingent upon the completion of a Phase II Environmental Assessment at the expense of Buyer that is satisfactory to the Buyer; and g. Seller agreed to expressly waive all relocation expenses and issues. If these contingencies are not satisfied, then this Agreement may be declared null and void by Buyer. The Buyer reserves the right to waive any one of these contingencies. 13. Waiver. Seller agrees to waive any objection to the City's granting to KAMI, Inc. or Venburg Tire a 350 foot setback variance with respect to the Venburg Tire development. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Purchase Agreement. Seller: LMCD PROPERTIES OF MINNESOTA,LLP By Its By Its Buyer: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ---- By---------- Date Its: Mayor ---- By---------- Date Its: City Manager Date Date m ~ ~ o s~r "~~a~o LL o~w ~ ~Q am ~ ~ aEZ o $~ w Wo ~ N '. = a ~a~' w ~ Y~ d w ~ U ~q¢ W ~ ~ Q ~ o " ~~ Q ~ ~a o 11 °~ \a ^ ~ ~~ z ~ x 0 U w49Z~4 - >OOZ 'f0 4verv 6W~IrvtlMb rvtTO]\SL91H%3\1rvONJ d Ob 0]\Pee~alEeN )o F~i~\a