HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013 07-22 City Council Meeting PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M. Monday, July 22, 2013
City Hall, Council Chambers
Meeting No. 13-13
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. Acknowledgement of Maplewood Residents Serving the Country.
C. ROLL CALL
Mayor’s Address on Protocol:
“Welcome to the meeting of the Maplewood City Council. It is our desire to keep all
discussions civil as we work through difficult issues tonight. If you are here for a Public
Hearing or to address the City Council, please familiarize yourself with the Policies and
Procedures and Rules of Civility, which are located near the entrance. Before addressing
the council, sign in with the City Clerk. At the podium please state your name and
address clearly for the record. All comments/questions shall be posed to the Mayor and
Council. The Mayor will then direct staff, as appropriate, to answer questions or respond
to comments.”
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of July 8, 2013 City Council Workshop Minutes
2. Approval of July 8, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. Promotion Ceremony for Officer Brian Bierdeman to Sergeant – No Report
2. Review of Legislative Session by Maplewood Representatives Fischer, Lillie and Ward
and Senators Wiger and Kent
G. CONSENT AGENDA – Items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine and non-
controversial and are approved by one motion of the council. If a councilmember requests
additional information or wants to make a comment regarding an item, the vote should be held
until the questions or comments are made then the single vote should be taken. If a
councilmember objects to an item it should be removed and acted upon as a separate item.
1. Approval Of Claims
2. Conditional Use Permit Review, All Metro Glass, 1357 Cope Avenue
3. Conditional Use Permit Review, South Metro Human Services Mental Health Care Facility,
1111 Viking Drive
4. Conditional Use Permit Review, St. Paul’s Priory Planned Unit Development, Benet Road
and Monastery Way
5. Approval of Grant Agreement Between the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District
and the City of Maplewood, July 2011 Storm Response, City Project 11-19
6. Approval of Purchase of Office Furniture for Investigations Division, Police Department
Expansion Project Phase 2
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing to Modify Development Program and Establish TIF District No. 1-12 for
Research and Development Facility on 3M Campus
a. Public Hearing Called for After 7:00 pm
1. Planning Commission and HEDC Recommendations
b. Resolution Approving the Modification to the Development Program for
Development District No. 1 and Establishing Tax Increment Financing District No.
1-12 and Approving a Tax Increment Financing Plan
c. Resolution Approving Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement with 3M
Companies
d. Resolution Approving an Inter-fund Loan Agreement
2. Public Hearing on Capital Improvement Plan for 2014-2018 and the Issuance of Capital
Improvement Bonds
a. Public Hearing
b. Resolution Approving 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Plan and the Issuance of
Capital Improvement Bonds (3 votes required)
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Authorization to Implement Capital Project to Construct Fire Station 1 on 3M Campus
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit, Our City/Our Neighborhood Church
at 1812 North St. Paul Road
2. Approval of Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review, Maplewood Auto
Mall, a Used Auto Sales Business at 2529 White Bear Avenue
3. Request of the City Council to Call a Special Meeting to Canvass the Results of the
August 13, 2013 Municipal Primary Election
K. AWARD OF BIDS
1. East Metro Public Safety Training Center, City Project 09-09, Bid Package 5,
a. Approval of Resolution Receiving Bids and Rejecting All Bids for Burn Building
and Burn Tower
b. Approval of Resolution Authorizing Re-Advertisement for Bids
L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Notice of Cancellation of the September 2, 2013 Council Manager Workshop
2. Council Calendar Update:
a. Police Department Open House – July 27th
b. National Night Out – August 6th
N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
O. ADJOURNMENT
Sign language interpreters for hearing impaired persons are available for public hearings upon request. The
request for this must be made at least 96 hours in advance. Please call the City Clerk’s Office at 651.249.2001 to
make arrangements. Assisted Listening Devices are also available. Please check with the City Clerk for availability.
RULES OF CIVILITY FOR OUR COMMUNITY
Following are some rules of civility the City of Maplewood expects of everyone appearing at Council Meetings
– elected officials, staff and citizens. It is hoped that by following these simple rules, everyone’s opinions can be heard
and understood in a reasonable manner. We appreciate the fact that when appearing at Council meetings, it is
understood that everyone will follow these principles: Show respect for each other, actively listen to one another, keep
emotions in check and use respectful language.
Item E1
July 8, 2013
City Council Workshop Minutes
1
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MANAGER WORKSHOP
5:00 P.M. Monday, July 8, 2013
Council Chambers, City Hall
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to
order at 5:02 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach.
B. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Robert Cardinal, Councilmember Present
Rebecca Cave, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Councilmember Cave moved to approve the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach Ayes – All
The motion passed.
D. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
E. NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion on Reappointment Process for Commissioners
City Manager Ahl gave the staff report and answered questions of the council.
2. Major Project Planning Updates:
a. Police Department Expansion
b. East Metro Public Safety Facility
IT Director Fowlds gave the staff report on the Police Department Expansion and answered
questions of the council. Public Works Director Thompson gave the staff report on the East
Metro Public Safety Facility. Fire Chief Lukin gave additional input on the East Metro Public
Safety Facility. Ron Leaf, Architect from SEH addressed and answered questions of the
council.
3. Fire Station Planning Report:
a. Fire Department Staffing Approach
b. Fire Station Number 1 on 3M Campus Planning
c. Future Station Upgrades
d. Funding Proposal
Fire Chief Lukin gave the staff report and answered questions of the council. City Manager Ahl
gave additional information on the Fire Station Planning Report.
F. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m.
Packet Page Number 1 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 1
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, July 8, 2013
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 12-13
A. CALL TO ORDER
A meeting of the City Council was held in the City Hall Council Chambers and was called to
order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Rossbach.
Joe Fox from the Ramsey County Fair was present and addressed the council to give a brief
summary on the 100th Anniversary of the Ramsey County Fair scheduled for July 10-14, 2013.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
Will Rossbach, Mayor Present
Robert Cardinal, Councilmember Present
Rebecca Cave, Councilmember Present
Kathleen Juenemann, Councilmember Present
Marvin Koppen, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
N1 National Night Out
N2 Cable Survey
N3 Business Meeting July 11th at the Maplewood Community Center
N4 Solar Energy Report
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
E. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of June 24, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the June 24, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes
as submitted.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
F. APPOINTMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS
None
Packet Page Number 2 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 2
G. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve agenda items G1-G3.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
1. Approval of Claims
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Approval of Claims.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 2,129,831.35 Checks # 90152 thru # 90185
dated 06/19/13 thru 06/25/13
$ 303,436.77 Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 06/17/13 thru 06/21/13
$ 2,433,268.12 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 510,097.21 Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 06/21/13
$ 763.00 Payroll Deduction check # 9989396 thru # 9989397 dated 06/21/13
$ 510,860.21 Total Payroll
$ 2,944,128.33 GRAND TOTAL
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
2. Approval of Resolution Certifying Election Judges for the August 13, 2013 Primary
Municipal Election
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Resolution Certifying Election Judges for the
August 13, 2013 Primary Municipal Election.
RESOLUTION 13-7-941
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ELECTION JUDGES
RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following list of
Election Judges for the 2013 Primary Election to be held on Tuesday, August 13, 2013.
Ahrens, Fran
Aikens, Meridith
Allen, Jim
Anderson, Nancy
Anderson, Suzanne
Ansari, Ahsan
Arnold, Ajla
Bartelt, Joan
Bedor, David
Packet Page Number 3 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 3
Beggs, Regan
Behr, Jeanette
Belland, Jaime
Berry, Robert (Bud)
Bierbaum, Al
Bjorklund, Diane
Bolden, Donita
Booher, Michele
Bortz, Albert
Bortz, Jeanne
Brandon, Richard
Brandon, Virginia
Bryan, Betty
Bunkowske, Bernice
Carle, Jeanette
Carson, Fannie
Carson, Helen
Casserly, Debra
Combe, Edward
Connelly, Thomas
Conover, Florence
Cude, Carol
Cude, Larry
Danielson, Nate
D'Arcio, India
DeBernardi, Nancy
Desai, Kalpana
DeZelar, Phil
Dickson, Helen Jean
Dittli, Albin
Droeger, Diane
Duellman, Audrey
Dunham, Bob
Eickhoff, Carolyn
Evans, Carol
Ewald, Jeanne
Fitzgerald, Delores
Fowler, Cynthia
Franzen, Nick
Freer, Mary Jo
Fuller, Mary
Katherine
Gaboury, Shirley
Galligher, Patricia
Garvey, Terrence
Gebauer, Victor
Gerten, John
Gierzak, Sister
Clarice
Golaski, Diane
Gravink, Barb
Gudknecht, Jamie
Gustafson, Dianne
Guthrie, Rosie
Haddad, Joyce
Hafner, Michael
Hahn, Sandra
Hahn, Vonna
Hanson, Joan
Harder, Mary
Hart, Barbara
Herber, Darlene
Hervig, Cindy
Hinnenkamp, Gary
Hulet, Jeanette
Hulet, Robert
Huth, Patricia
Huth, Raymond
Inhofer, Mary Claire
Jagoe, Carole
Jahn, David
Jensen, Robert
Johannessen, Judith
Johansen, Kathleen
Johnson, Warren
Jones, Shirley
Julich, Robert
Kapfer, Deb
Karner, Ann
Kipka, Judy
Kirchoff, Harold
Knauss, Carol
Knutson, Lois
Kramer, Dennis
Kreger, Jason
Kwapick, Jackie
Lackner, Marvella
Lampe, Charlotte
Larson, Michelle
Lauren, Lorraine
Layer, Stephanie
Layer, Tom
Leiter, Barbara
Leonard, Claudette
Liptak, Marianne
Lockwood, Jackie
Loipersbeck, Darlene
Loipersbeck, Jules
Mahowald, Valerie
Mahre, Jeri
Mammenga II,
Donald
Manthey, John
Maskrey, Thomas
McCann, John
McCarthy, Peggy
McCauley, Judy
Mechelke, Mary Lou
Meister-Westermann,
Jean
Millette, James
Moreno, Marlene
Muenchow, Mike
Myster, Thomas
Nelson, Clare
Nelson, Percy
Newcomb, Mary
Nichol, Jane
Nichols, Miranda
Nissen, Helen
Norberg, Ann
Noyes, Douglas
O'Brien, D. William
(Bill)
Olson, Anita
Olson, Lois
Olson, Norman
Parent, Dian
Pedersen, Bernard
Peper, Marilyn
Petrie, Linda
Posch, Roger
Putz, Shelly
Putz, Steve
Rawn, Stephanie
Renslow, Rita
Rodriguez, Vincent
Rudeen, Elaine
Sagert, Chris
Sandberg, Janet
Sands, Warren
Sauer, Elmer
Sauer, Kathleen
Sauro, Janet
Sawyer, Sharon
Scharnott, Thomas
Schluender, Cynthia
Schmidt, William
Schneider, Mary Ann
Schramel, Betty
Schramel, Jim
Schultz, Louise
Seitz, James
Seyfer, Deborah
Shores, Teresa
Skaar, Delaney
Skaar, Steven
Skaar, Susan
Spangler, Bob
Packet Page Number 4 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 4
Stafki, Tim
Steenberg, Judith
Steenberg, Richard
Storm, Mary
Strack, Joan
Taylor, Lori
Thomforde, Faith
Tourville, Michael
Trippler, Dale
Tschida, Micki
Urbanski, Carolyn
Urbanski, Holly
Urbanski, William
Vanek, Mary
Vereide, Jim
Warren, Karen
Wasmundt, Gayle
Wolfgram, Dorothy
Yorkovich, Cindy
Young, Linda
Zian, Helen
Zipko, Leroy
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3. Approval to Extend Publishing Agreement with Nystrom Printing for the
Maplewood Monthly
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve to Extend the Printing and Publishing Agreement
with Nystrom Publishing Company until the end of 2013.
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
H. PUBLIC HEARING
None
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approval of Resolution for the Conditional Use Permit Revision for a Planned Unit
Development and Design Review for Proposed Harmony Learning Center
Greenhouse, 1961 County Road C East
Senior Planner Ekstrand gave the staff report and answered questions of the council. Brian
Schlottman from Century College addressed and answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve:
A. Adopt the resolution amending the conditional use permit for a planned unit development for
the Harmony Learning Center, located at 1695 County Road C East, to allow the
construction of a greenhouse. This resolution deletes the 1985 PUD approval for senior
housing, which was never built, and incorporates the more recent CUP approval for the T-
Mobile cell phone tower (deletions are crossed out and additions are underlined.)
Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Maplewood City Council that a conditional use permit
be granted for the Harmony School site planned unit development, including the following
variances:
Packet Page Number 5 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 5
1. Allow 79 parking spaces for the 52-unit senior’s residence, rather than the 104 required
by code.
2. Allow 26 enclosed parking spaces rather than the 52 enclosed spaces required by the
code.
Approval of the conditional use permit and variances is subject to:
1. If council determines that there is insufficient on-site parking for the 52-unit seniors
residence, within one year of 95% occupancy, additional parking may be required.
2. Maplewood and North St. Paul shall have continued use of the athletic facilities in the
northeast portion of the site until that part of the site develops, provided the use of these
facilities do not interfere with the applicant’s use of the property.
3. The 52-unit seniors residence shall not be converted shall to non-seniors housing
without revision of the planned unit development. For purposes of this permit, senior’s
housing is defined as a residence occupied by persons in their retirement years with a
significant number of one-person households.
4. The auditorium attached to the 52-unit senior’s residence shall only be used by the
residents of that building. Public assembly unrelated to senior use would be prohibited
without a revision of this permit.
5. The commercial portion of the development shall be limited to the uses allowed in the
BC(M), business commercial (modified) zoning district.
6. The eight parking spaces (marked “future”) located south of the driveway to the garage
for the 64-structure shall be constructed.
7. The proposed 575 square foot units in the 52-unit residence (October 8, 1985 plans)
shall be increased in area to at least 580 square feet of habitable floor area.
8. Move the 64-unit residence to the west to comply with the required minimum setback of
50 feet.
9. Adherence to the site plan dated October 8, 1985, except as required in these
conditions, unless a change is approved by the community design review board.
1. All construction shall follow the site plans approved by the city. The community
development staff may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval of the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. This conditional use permit is conditioned upon T-Mobile allowing the co-location of
other provider’s telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower. T-Mobile shall
submit a letter to staff allowing co-location before a building permit can be issued.
Packet Page Number 6 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 6
5. If any required landscaping for the T-Mobile tower dies, plantings must be replaced
pursuant to the city policy and standards.
6. The school district shall provide a site plan with their building permit submittal that
verifies that the proposed greenhouse would be placed no closer than 75 feet to the
wetland to the north. For the purposes of defining the edge of the wetland, that shall be
considered to be the edge of the cat tails.
7. This approval acknowledges that the school district’s educational activities are permitted
by this permit. Any new construction or exterior improvements are subject to compliance
with the design-review requirements in the city code, and perhaps, may require
amendment of this conditional use permit.
B. Approve the design plans date-stamped May 21, 2013 for the greenhouse at Harmony
Learning Center, 1695 County Road C East, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the building official and assistant fire
chief.
2. The applicant shall submit plans detailing any grading or footing work for review prior to
commencing with the greenhouse construction to the city engineer. The applicant shall
comply with any requirements generated by the review or grading and erosion control
permit.
3. The applicant shall provide a site plan with their building permit submittal that verifies
that the proposed greenhouse would be placed no closer than 75 feet to the wetland to
the north. For the purposes of defining the edge of the wetland, that shall be considered
to be the edge of the cat tails.
RESOLUTION 13-7-942
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Independent School District 622, applied for a conditional use permit to
amend the planned unit development for the Harmony Learning Center, to install a 21-foot by
36-foot greenhouse.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1961 County Road C East. The legal description is:
That part of the Southwest ¼ of Section 2, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. More
particularly described as: Beginning at the intersection of White Bear Avenue and the South link
of Said Southwest 1/4; thence northerly on said center line 420.55 feet; thence east parallel with
said South line 311 feet; thence northerly parallel with said center line 140 feet; thence north
107.07 feet, thence east 391.55 feet to a point 658.95 feet north of said South line; thence to
said South line at a point 200 feet west of said ¼ corner; then West to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 18, 2013, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The planning commission gave persons at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The commission also considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff. The planning commission recommended that this CUP amendment be
approved.
Packet Page Number 7 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 7
2. On July 8, 2013, the city council discussed the proposed conditional use permit
amendment. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning
commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above-
described conditional use permit revision, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plans approved by the city. The community
development staff may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval of the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline
for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. This conditional use permit is conditioned upon T-Mobile allowing the co-location of
other provider’s telecommunications equipment on the proposed tower. T-Mobile shall
submit a letter to staff allowing co-location before a building permit can be issued.
5. If any required landscaping for the T-Mobile tower dies, plantings must be replaced
pursuant to the city policy and standards.
Packet Page Number 8 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 8
6. The school district shall provide a site plan with their building permit submittal that
verifies that the proposed greenhouse would be placed no closer than 75 feet to the
wetland to the north. For the purposes of defining the edge of the wetland, that shall be
considered to be the edge of the cat tails.
7. This approval acknowledges that the school district’s educational activities are permitted
by this permit. Any new construction or exterior improvements are subject to compliance
with the design-review requirements in the city code, and perhaps, may require
amendment of this conditional use permit.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 8, 2013.
Seconded by Mayor Rossbach Ayes – All
The motion passed.
2. Approval of Plans for a Building Addition and Parking Waiver for Maplewood
Town Center, 1885 County Road D East
Senior Planner Ekstrand gave the staff report and answered questions of the council. Daniel
Pollastrini from Pope Architects addressed and answered questions of the council.
Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the plans date-stamped June 4, 2013, for the
proposed addition to the east side of the Maplewood Town Center shopping center, located at
1845 County Road D East. This approval includes a parking waiver to allow 87 fewer parking
spaces than the city code requires. Approval of the parking waiver is because: the proposed
parking reduction only amounts to 14 percent, which is a minor reduction, and because the
Maplewood Town Center shopping center has functioned with a reduced amount of parking in
the past and has never experienced a difficulty in providing adequate parking for patrons.
Approval of the proposed addition is subject to the applicant complying with the following
conditions:
1. Repeating this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project.
2. Comply with the requirements of the city’s engineering department and building official and
assistant fire chief as stated in this report.
3. Before getting a building permit, the applicant shall provide a design plan for the proposed
trash enclosure. The design of this enclosure shall match the materials and color of the
building.
4. The community design review board shall approve major changes to these plans. Minor
changes may be approved by staff.
5. Replace any trees that are removed on a one-to-one basis. Replacement trees must be at
least two inches in caliper. The applicant should replace any trees that they remove
somewhere on the property and submit a replacement plan to staff prior to obtaining a
building permit.
6. Provide a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for all required exterior
improvements. The amount shall be 150 percent of the cost of the work.
Packet Page Number 9 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 9
Seconded by Councilmember Juenemann Ayes – All
The motion passed.
3. Authorization to Begin Design Services for Fire Station Number 1 on 3M Campus
City Manager Ahl gave the staff report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the City Manager enter into an agreement with
Kimley-Horn, Inc. for engineering and architectural services up to $50,000 for final design
services for a new fire station on 3M property with funding from the General Fund.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
K. AWARD OF BIDS
None
L. VISITOR PRESENTATION
1. Mark Bradley, Maplewood Resident
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Council Meeting Calendar Report
City Manager Ahl gave a report on upcoming council manager workshop and council meeting
topics.
2. Report on July 4th Event – No Report
Citizen Services Director Guilfoile gave a report on the July 4th event estimating that the event
was well attended and within budget. Guilfoile extended thanks to all of the employees that
assisted with the event. .
N. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. National Night Out
Councilmember Juenemann reminded residents that National Night Out is scheduled for
Tuesday, August 6th. Acting Chief Kvam provided additional information.
2. Cable Survey
Councilmember Cardinal gave a report on the results of the Ramsey-Washington County Cable
Commission Survey.
3. Business Meeting
Councilmember Cardinal informed residents that a breakfast business meeting will be held on
Thursday, July 11th at 7:30-9:00 a.m. at the Maplewood Community Center. The topic of the
Packet Page Number 10 of 275
Item E2
July 8, 2013
City Council Meeting Minutes 10
meeting will be on the master plan for the vision of city parks, trails and preserves for the next
20 years.
4. Solar Energy Report
Councilmember Cardinal requested a report from staff on the energy savings with the Solar
Energy Panels that are located on campus.
O. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rossbach adjourned the meeting at 7:54 p.m.
Packet Page Number 11 of 275
Agenda Item F2
Agenda Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Charles Ahl, City Manager
DATE: July 16, 2013
SUBJECT: Review of Legislative Session by Maplewood Representatives
Fischer, Lillie, Ward and Senator Wiger
INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
This item is informational and intended to provide the Council a presentation and discussion
with our state representatives and senators regarding the recently concluded legislative session.
No action is required.
Invited Legislators:
1. Representative Peter Fischer
2. Representative Leon Lillie
3. Representative Joan Ward
4. Senator Chuck Wiger
5. Senator Susan Kent
Note: these five legislators were instrumental in supporting and providing leadership on the 3M
TIF Legislation that was approved during the 2013 Session. We have invited these legislators
to remain for the TIF Hearing on 3M that follows on the agenda.
RECOMMENDATION
No action required.
Packet Page Number 12 of 275
S:\FINANCE\APPROVAL OF CLAIMS\2013\AprClms - 6-28 and 7-5 and 7-12.xlsx
AGENDA NO.G-1
TO:City Council
FROM:Finance Manager
RE:APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE:
774,291.22$ Checks # 90186 thru # 90241
dated 06/27/13 thru 07/02/13
440,693.58$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 06/24/13 thru 06/28/13
2,388,181.56$ Checks # 90242 thru #90280
dated 07/09/13 thru 07/15/13
188,767.80$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 07/01/13 thru 07/05/13
214,335.23$ Checks # 90281 thru # 90325
dated 07/11/13 thru 07/16/13
602,930.58$ Disbursements via debits to checking account
dated 07/08/13 thru 07/12/13
4,609,199.97$ Total Accounts Payable
588,035.45$ Payroll Checks and Direct Deposits dated 07/05/13
763.00$ Payroll Deduction check # 9989424 thru # 9989425
dated 07/05/13
588,798.45$ Total Payroll
5,197,998.42$ GRAND TOTAL
as
attachments
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Please call me at 651-249-2902 if you have any questions on the
attached listing. This will allow me to check the supporting documentation on file if necessary.
PAYROLL
AGENDA REPORT
July 22, 2013
Attached is a listing of paid bills for informational purposes. The City Manager has reviewed the bills
and authorized payment in accordance with City Council approved policies.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
Packet Page Number 13 of 275
Check Description Amount
90186 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 10,000.00
90187 00111 PATROL HOURS 6/3 - 6/16 1,400.00
90188 01936 REIMB FOR MILEAGE & INTERNET 93.48
90189 04508 UMPIRE FEES APRIL, MAY, & PART JUNE 7,738.00
90190 00223 RETIREMENT PLAQUE - FRASER 240.00
90191 02149 MARKETING & ADVERTISING - JUNE 4,000.00
90192 05028 CITY HALL SOLAR SYSTEM LEASE-JUNE 397.00
05028 MCC SOLAR SYSTEM LEASE - JUNE 369.00
90193 00519 REPAIR OF BULLDOG NOZZLE 820.05
90194 04917 PROJ 04-21 GLADSTONE I FINAL PMT 68,402.93
90195 04316 AUTO PAWN SYSTEM - MAY 788.40
90196 01085 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 3,035.60
90197 01202 RECREATION BROCHURE & POSTAGE 11,598.00
90198 01337 FLEET SUPPORT FEES - JUNE 414.96
90199 01409 PROJ 09-09 CONSULTANT SERVICES 35,720.71
01409 PROJ 09-08 CONSULTANT SERVICES 7,117.52
01409 PROJ 04-21 CONSULTANT SERVICES 397.59
90200 01574 PROJ 10-14 WESTERN HILLS FINAL PMT 17,112.89
90201 01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 21,775.50
90202 05026 TENNIS INSTRUCTION SESSION I 539.00
90203 00120 POOL CHEMICALS MCC 975.77
90204 04047 BANQUET ROOM/THEATER SRVS 2/8-5/16 962.00
90205 01974 REFUND FOR TRANS MEDIC 801276119 1,466.48
90206 00230 RED BALL DIAMOND ROCK FOR PARKS 691.98
90207 05215 2ND HALF SOCCER INSTRUCTION 600.00
90208 04311 REIMB FOR MEALS 6/17 - 6/19 35.32
90209 05181 POLICE DEPT EXPANSION PROJ 16,530.00
90210 04529 REMOTE CAR SYS RE-INSTALL 312.50
90211 05232 ESCROW RELEASE 1987 CO RD D EAST 5,027.95
90212 04064 SECURITY OFFICER FOR MCC JUNE 29 262.50
90213 00569 REIMB FOR MEALS 4/21 - 4/26 40.04
90214 03988 REIMB FOR TUITION & BOOKS 3/31-6/9 772.01
90215 00644 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 12,377.50
90216 05014 FINAL PMT SOUND/LIGHTING JULY 4TH 1,150.00
90217 03841 REPAIR OF SENTINEL RADIO ALARM 282.84
90218 03756 COURT ORDERED ATTORNEY FEES 2,191.25
90219 04310 MEMBERSHIP FEES 70.00
90220 00942 JANITORIAL SERVICES - JUNE 6,578.16
00942 SEWER BACKUP 1133 CO RD B E 336.66
90221 03818 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 155,592.20
90222 03886 NOTARY COMMISSION APPLICATIONS 360.00
90223 01126 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 480.00
90224 00001 REIMB D WHITSON TURF RESTORATION 400.00
90225 00001 REFUND D COOK SOFTBALL 69.00
90226 00001 REIMB S YANG TURF RESTORATION 48.08
90227 00001 REFUND E COLLINS MEDICA BENEFIT 20.00
90228 05112 REIMB FOR MEALS 6/17 - 6/19 36.39
90229 04054 DJ FOR CARVER & MCC DANCE 400.00
90230 01418 SUPPLIES FOR TEEN DANCE & DAYCAMP 297.51
01418 VENDING MACHINE SUPPLIES 208.84
01418 CONCESSIONS 207.82
01418 ITEMS FOR RESALE 29.94
01418 SUPPLIES FOR CONFERENCE ROOMS 6.30
90231 03879 EMS FEES - JULY 738.67
90232 00006 REFUND F IVORY MEDICA BENEFIT 20.00
07/02/2013 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
07/02/2013 SANSIO
07/02/2013 SILVER SNEAKERS
07/02/2013 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
07/02/2013 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
07/02/2013 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
07/02/2013 JAMES RYAN PARKER
07/02/2013 STEVEN REED
07/02/2013 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
07/02/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/02/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/02/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/02/2013 MN SECRETARY OF STATE
07/02/2013 NCPERS MINNESOTA
07/02/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/02/2013 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO
07/02/2013 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE CO
07/02/2013 MEDICA
07/02/2013 KARAS TECHNICAL SERVICES
07/02/2013 DIANA LONGRIE
07/02/2013 M C F O A
07/02/2013 JODI HALWEG
07/02/2013 HEALTHPARTNERS
07/02/2013 ICABOD PRODUCTIONS LLC
07/02/2013 FENDLER PATTERSON CONSTRUCTION
07/02/2013 DEREK FRITZE
07/02/2013 CLARENCE GERVAIS
07/02/2013 JOSEPH DEMULLING
07/02/2013 DERAU CONSTRUCTION
07/02/2013 ELSAG NORTH AMERICA
07/02/2013 BLUE CROSS REFUNDS
07/02/2013 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
07/02/2013 CORESTRONG FITNESS LLC
07/02/2013 ADVANTAGE SPORTS LLC
07/02/2013 AQUA LOGIC INC
07/02/2013 ASHLAND PRODUCTIONS
07/02/2013 S E H
07/02/2013 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
07/02/2013 XCEL ENERGY
07/02/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/02/2013 S E H
07/02/2013 S E H
07/02/2013 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS RECEIVABLES
07/02/2013 MN LIFE INSURANCE
07/02/2013 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
07/02/2013 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES SOLAR, LLC
07/02/2013 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL CO.
07/02/2013 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION CO.
07/02/2013 BRODIN STUDIOS, INC.
07/02/2013 HEIDI CAREY
07/02/2013 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES SOLAR, LLC
07/02/2013 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
07/02/2013 CHAD BERGO
07/02/2013 BETWEEN THE LINES
Check Register
City of Maplewood
06/27/2013
Date Vendor
06/27/2013 US BANK
Packet Page Number 14 of 275
90233 01565 PARTS & REPAIR ON STREET SWEEPER 1,602.91
90234 04814 REIMB FOR MEALS 6/17 - 6/19 34.67
90235 04104 MCC EQUIP UPGRADE APPLICATION #1 217,567.50
04104 MCC EQUIP UPGRADE APPLICATION #2 108,783.75
04104 UPGRADE/REPLACE AHU#2 CITY HALL 32,940.00
90236 01649 JACKHAMMER RENTAL FOR BOBCAT 701.25
90237 01669 FORFEITED VEHILCE & OTHER TOWING 737.45
90238 05231 REFUND FOR TRANS MEDIC 1,926.51
90239 04357 BIOMEDICAL FEES 765.00
90240 03682 INFLATABLES FOR JULY 4TH 6,009.80
90241 05013 MAINT ON PW MECHANICAL EQUIP 973.04
05013 MAINT ON CH MECHANICAL EQUIP 711.00
774,291.22
56 Checks in this report.
07/02/2013 USA INFLATABLES
07/02/2013 YALE MECHANICAL LLC
07/02/2013 YALE MECHANICAL LLC
07/02/2013 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT &
07/02/2013 UNITED HEALTH CARE SRVS., INC.
07/02/2013 UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SRVS, INC.
07/02/2013 TRANE U.S. INC.
07/02/2013 TRANE U.S. INC.
07/02/2013 TRI-STATE BOBCAT, INC.
07/02/2013 SWEEPER SERVICES
07/02/2013 BRIAN TAUZELL
07/02/2013 TRANE U.S. INC.
Packet Page Number 15 of 275
Settlement
Date Payee Description Amount
6/24/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 56,344.29
6/24/2013 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 98,552.87
6/24/2013 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.86,846.38
6/25/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 45,918.33
6/25/2013 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 14,302.70
6/25/2013 Labor Unions Union Dues 3,536.97
6/25/2013 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 19,922.70
6/26/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 39,385.52
6/27/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 48,057.43
6/27/2013 US Bank Bank fees 107.82
6/28/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 25,529.18
6/28/2013 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 986.00
6/28/2013 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 1,203.39
440,693.58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 16 of 275
Check Description Amount
90242 05114 PROJ 12-13 PROF SRVS 4/27 - 5/24 6,008.54
90243 00526 PROJ 09-08 HWY 36/ENGLISH PMT#5 2,261,270.52
90244 00687 TRIMMING & REMOVAL BRANCES/TREES 2,605.02
00687 REMOVAL OF OAK TREE PD BUILDOUT 480.94
00687 TREE TRIMMING 2324 MAPLE/2137 BEAM 213.75
90245 02728 PROJ 09-08 PROF SRVS TRHU 5/31 17,444.92
02728 PROJ 04-21 PROF SRVS THRU 05/31 2,381.02
02728 PROJ 08-13 PROF SRVS THRU 5/31 1,185.87
02728 PROF SRVS THRU 5/31 810.90
90246 04265 ZUMBA INSTRUCTION TUE EVE JUNE 193.00
90247 01337 PROJ 11-14 PLANTS FOR RAINGARDENS 1,118.98
01337 PLANTS FOR MCC 1,038.83
01337 MULCH FOR RAIN GARDENS 480.94
01337 PROJ 11-14 PLANTS FOR RAINGARDENS 363.38
90248 01574 BITUMINOUS PURCHASES~2,657.92
90249 01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 15,884.72
01190 ELECTRIC & GAS UTILITY 323.47
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 144.92
01190 ELECTRIC UTILITY 52.01
90250 01798 CONTRACT GASOLINE - JUNE 17,847.22
90251 05230 SHOW SETTLEMENT MCC JUNE 29 1,220.00
90252 03780 REPAIR/SERVICE ON SQUAD RADARS 912.63
03780 REPAIR/SERVICE ON SQUAD RADARS 226.11
03780 REPAIR/SERVICE ON SQUAD RADARS 166.80
90253 04848 MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 259.27
90254 00163 TIRES FOR FIRE TRUCK UNIT #438 3,205.63
90255 00420 VEHICLE CLEANING & DETAILING 128.24
90256 00472 CONSULTING FEES 6/17 - 6/28 1,250.00
90257 00479 MANHOLE RINGS & MORTAR 1,217.31
90258 02929 LTC MONTHLY PREMIUM - JULY 366.84
90259 05032 PRINTING SERVICES 5,132.92
90260 05030 EQUIP LEASE - MCC - PMT#12 4,344.07
90261 05192 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 4/4 - 5/8 50.29
05192 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 5/10 - 5/17 42.38
90262 04286 SHOW SETTLEMENT MCC JUNE 27 1,092.00
90263 02215 SECURITY OFFICER MCC JUNE 29 262.50
90264 03886 NOTARY COMMISSION APPLICATION 120.00
90265 00001 CHARITABLE GAMBLING ST JEROME SCHOOL 620.00
90266 00001 REFUND E-PUFF INVESTIGATION FEE 135.00
90267 00001 REFUND M YANTO MEMBERSHIP 115.65
90268 00001 REFUND B FYKSEN JUST GO SPORTS 42.00
90269 00001 REFUND S NICHOLS HP BENEFIT 40.00
90270 01338 NOTARY PUBLIC COUNTY FEE 20.00
90271 01359 VEHICLE WASHES - MAY 124.00
90272 02001 PHONE SERVICE - JUNE 1,436.20
90273 05225 PROJ 11-19 PIPE FOR OVERFLOW PROJ 1,634.33
90274 01417 CHARITABLE GAMBLING 1,399.00
90275 04074 ADJ TAI CHI INSTRUCTION 5/22 - 07/24 9.00
90276 00198 WATER UTILITY 1,486.50
90277 01836 PROJ 10-14 WATER HYDRANTS/MAINS 8,198.91
01836 PROJ 10-14 WATER HYDRANTS/MAINS 2,245.27
01836 PROJ 10-14 WATER HYDRANTS/MAINS 2,209.99
90278 01550 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS - JUNE 3,850.60
90279 00529 LTD PLAN 4043120-2 - JULY 3,090.49
00529 STD PLAN 4043120-1 - JULY 2,395.76
90280 03738 ATTORNEY SRVS FEES/RENT - AUG 6,625.0007/15/2013 CHARLES E. BETHEL
2,388,181.56
39 Checks in this report.
07/09/2013 SUMMIT INSPECTIONS
07/09/2013 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
07/09/2013 UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO
07/09/2013 ST PAUL, CITY OF
07/09/2013 ST PAUL, CITY OF
07/09/2013 ST PAUL, CITY OF
07/09/2013 SALVATION ARMY
07/09/2013 ELAINE SCHRADE
07/09/2013 ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
07/09/2013 REGAL AUTO WASH BILLING
07/09/2013 CITY OF ROSEVILLE
07/09/2013 ROYAL CONCRETE PIPE, INC.
07/09/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/09/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/09/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-VITAL RECORDS
07/09/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/09/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/09/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/09/2013 LORIE LINE MUSIC, INC.
07/09/2013 JASON MARINO
07/09/2013 MN SECRETARY OF STATE
07/09/2013 KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN
07/09/2013 CAITLIN KELLEY
07/09/2013 CAITLIN KELLEY
07/09/2013 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
07/09/2013 GLTC PREMIUM PAYMENTS
07/09/2013 IMAGING PATH
07/09/2013 BAUER BUILT
07/09/2013 DOWNTOWNER DETAIL CENTER
07/09/2013 MICHAEL A ERICSON
07/09/2013 ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES
07/09/2013 ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES
07/09/2013 AVESIS
07/09/2013 YOCUM OIL CO.
07/09/2013 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT A BEATLES TRIBUTE
07/09/2013 ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES
07/09/2013 XCEL ENERGY
07/09/2013 XCEL ENERGY
07/09/2013 XCEL ENERGY
07/09/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/09/2013 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
07/09/2013 XCEL ENERGY
07/09/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/09/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/09/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/09/2013 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
07/09/2013 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
07/09/2013 MARIA PIRELA
07/09/2013 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
07/09/2013 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
07/09/2013 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC
07/09/2013 FOREST LAKE CONTRACTING INC
07/09/2013 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
07/09/2013 HUGO'S TREE CARE INC
Check Register
City of Maplewood
07/08/2013
Date Vendor
07/09/2013 BOLTON & MENK, INC.
Packet Page Number 17 of 275
Settlement
Date Payee Description Amount
7/1/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 32,290.64
7/1/2013 US Bank Merchant Services Credit Card Billing fee 2,478.59
7/2/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 35,241.70
7/3/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 38,355.72
7/5/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 38,102.92
7/5/2013 US Bank VISA One Card*Purchasing card items 38,705.73
7/5/2013 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Deferred Compensation 3,592.50
188,767.80
*Detailed listing of VISA purchases is attached.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 18 of 275
Transaction Date Posting Date Merchant Name Transaction Amount Name
06/17/2013 06/18/2013 FINANCE AND COMMERCE INC $249.00 R CHARLES AHL
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 LA POLICE GEAR INC $161.45 MARK ALDRIDGE
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFIC $505.00 GAYLE BAUMAN
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 ST PAUL STAMP WORKS INC $71.88 REGAN BEGGS
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 THINGS REMEMBERED 0956 $118.91 REGAN BEGGS
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 ASPEN MILLS INC.$61.45 MARKESE BENJAMIN
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 DISPLAYS2GOCOM $43.15 CHRISTINE BERNARDY
06/24/2013 06/25/2013 CUB FOODS #1599 $7.98 NEIL BRENEMAN
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 HUDSON HOUSE GRAND HOTEL $378.00 NEIL BRENEMAN
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 FIRST SHRED $144.50 SARAH BURLINGAME
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 US CAVALRY $242.35 JOHN CARNES
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 PATCH SUPPLY INC $22.00 JOHN CARNES
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 NFPA NATL FIRE PROTECT $49.45 NICHOLAS CARVER
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 ACT*10KLAKES $120.00 NICHOLAS CARVER
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE ($3.21)SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $10.02 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/17/2013 06/18/2013 HEJNY RENTAL INC $23.18 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR $590.38 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 KELE INC $564.93 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $30.73 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $83.54 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $62.19 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $179.72 SCOTT CHRISTENSON
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 PROVANTAGE LLC $31.05 KERRY CROTTY
06/16/2013 06/17/2013 FRATTALLONES WOODBURY AC $32.13 CHARLES DEAVER
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 FRATTALLONES WOODBURY AC $10.49 CHARLES DEAVER
06/13/2013 06/17/2013 CEMSTONE-EAGAN $255.39 THOMAS DEBILZAN
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 KEEPRS INC 2 $21.50 JOSEPH DEMULLING
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$18.70 JOSEPH DEMULLING
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 WRIGHTLEATHERWORKS $74.98 JOSEPH DEMULLING
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$102.00 RICHARD DOBLAR
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$15.49 RICHARD DOBLAR
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE $118.70 RICHARD DOBLAR
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 CUB FOODS #1599 $3.24 RICHARD DOBLAR
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 TARGET 00022293 $10.16 RICHARD DOBLAR
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 NOODLES & CO 330 $11.45 RICHARD DOBLAR
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $19.30 TOM DOUGLASS
06/17/2013 06/18/2013 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPM $624.35 TOM DOUGLASS
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 WW GRAINGER $18.42 TOM DOUGLASS
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $49.17 TOM DOUGLASS
06/18/2013 06/20/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $8.00 TOM DOUGLASS
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $11.02 TOM DOUGLASS
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 HENRIKSEN ACE HARDWARE $3.20 TOM DOUGLASS
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $24.60 JOHN DUCHARME
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 CINTAS 470 $90.27 LARRY FARR
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 GOODIN COMPANY ($375.47)LARRY FARR
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 TARGET 00024067 $20.66 LARRY FARR
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC $612.42 LARRY FARR
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 ELECTRO WATCHMAN INC $4,074.00 LARRY FARR
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO INC $225.08 LARRY FARR
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 DISPLAYS2GOCOM $261.60 LARRY FARR
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 THE TRANE COMPANY $470.00 LARRY FARR
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 MUSKA ELECTRIC CO.$267.00 LARRY FARR
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 CINTAS 470 $90.27 LARRY FARR
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 EUREKA RECYCLING $300.00 SHANN FINWALL
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $2.75 SHANN FINWALL
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 FASTSIGNS OF MAPLEWOOD $233.02 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/15/2013 06/17/2013 WW GRAINGER $392.30 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/21/2013 06/21/2013 COMCAST CABLE COMM $54.00 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $64.71 MYCHAL FOWLDS
Packet Page Number 19 of 275
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 OFFICE MAX $52.35 MYCHAL FOWLDS
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 SYM*SECURE SITE SSL $1,118.00 NICK FRANZEN
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 MICROSOFT TECH SUPPORT $259.00 NICK FRANZEN
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 BESTBUY.COM 00009944 $160.68 NICK FRANZEN
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 IDU*INSIGHT PUBLIC SEC $61.39 NICK FRANZEN
06/24/2013 06/25/2013 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE $43.28 CLARENCE GERVAIS
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 BECKER FIRE & SAFETY SERV $58.83 CLARENCE GERVAIS
06/13/2013 06/17/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $137.31 JEAN GLASS
06/22/2013 06/24/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $9.46 JEAN GLASS
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $58.61 JEAN GLASS
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 SQ *KINNICKINNIC NATIVES $194.65 JAN GREW HAYMAN
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 RAINBOW FOODS 00088617 $72.89 KAREN GUILFOILE
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $64.02 MARK HAAG
06/15/2013 06/17/2013 AMERICAN RED CROSS $894.15 RON HORWATH
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $3.19 RON HORWATH
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $13.11 RON HORWATH
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $21.39 RON HORWATH
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 ON SITE SANITATION INC $299.35 ANN HUTCHINSON
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 FOREST PRODUCTS SUPPLY $200.00 ANN HUTCHINSON
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 BLUE RIBBON BAIT & TACKLE $11.22 ANN HUTCHINSON
06/24/2013 06/24/2013 AMAZON.COM $192.44 DAVID JAHN
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $55.69 LOIS KNUTSON
06/20/2013 06/20/2013 COMCAST CABLE COMM $166.53 DUWAYNE KONEWKO
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 DELTA AIR 0062334846015 $419.80 DUWAYNE KONEWKO
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$89.98 NICHOLAS KREKELER
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 STREICHER'S MPLS $278.31 NICHOLAS KREKELER
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 JAKE'S CITY GRILLE - M $44.75 DAVID KVAM
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE $87.50 STEVE LUKIN
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 SARPINOS PIZZERIA $121.36 STEVE LUKIN
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 OVERHEAD DOOR COMP $368.45 STEVE LUKIN
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 REPUBLIC SERVICES TRASH $138.36 STEVE LUKIN
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 ASPEN MILLS INC.$48.95 STEVE LUKIN
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 ASPEN MILLS INC.$15.00 STEVE LUKIN
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 ASPEN MILLS INC.$124.85 STEVE LUKIN
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 ASPEN MILLS INC.$48.95 STEVE LUKIN
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT $1,710.52 STEVE LUKIN
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 STREICHER'S MO $34.25 JASON MARINO
06/15/2013 06/17/2013 CUB FOODS, INC.$13.92 JERROLD MARTIN
06/13/2013 06/17/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$127.59 ALESIA METRY
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $16.38 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $8.90 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $99.50 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $631.85 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/18/2013 06/20/2013 OFFICE MAX $59.95 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 VIDACARE CORPORATION $1,048.47 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC $232.94 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 WALGREENS #11421 $339.98 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 INDUSTRIAL ENGRAVING INC $88.00 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $92.00 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $12.39 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC $463.07 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 OFFICE MAX $29.86 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE $66.75 MICHAEL MONDOR
06/22/2013 06/24/2013 SPRINT STORE #226 $38.55 BRYAN NAGEL
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 KNOWLAN'S MARKET #2 $5.99 MICHAEL NYE
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 ADVENTURE RV CENTER $160.60 MICHAEL NYE
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $90.51 MARY KAY PALANK
06/22/2013 06/24/2013 UPS*1Z4T6W290390025819 $12.16 MARY KAY PALANK
06/22/2013 06/24/2013 HOLIDAY STNSTORE 3836 $23.56 ROBERT PETERSON
06/18/2013 06/20/2013 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABO $499.18 PHILIP F POWELL
06/19/2013 06/19/2013 TAB PRODUCTSJETER SYS $182.28 PHILIP F POWELL
Packet Page Number 20 of 275
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 COOPER SAFETY SHOP DIRECT $187.43 PHILIP F POWELL
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 METROLINE INCS $358.95 PHILIP F POWELL
06/17/2013 06/18/2013 KATH FUEL OFFICE $547.49 STEVEN PRIEM
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 FRONTIER INC $189.28 STEVEN PRIEM
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 BOYER TRUCK PARTS $81.61 STEVEN PRIEM
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL 392 $392.83 STEVEN PRIEM
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL 392 $102.04 STEVEN PRIEM
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 AN FORD WHITE BEAR LAK $96.10 STEVEN PRIEM
06/18/2013 06/21/2013 COMO LUBE & SUPPLIES $88.38 STEVEN PRIEM
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL $856.54 STEVEN PRIEM
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA $63.47 STEVEN PRIEM
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 POLAR CHEVROLET MAZDA $84.93 STEVEN PRIEM
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 WHEELCO BRAKE &SUPPLY $184.21 STEVEN PRIEM
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL 392 $237.87 STEVEN PRIEM
06/24/2013 06/25/2013 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL 392 $35.73 STEVEN PRIEM
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 FLEETPRIDE 570 $133.97 STEVEN PRIEM
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 BATTERIES PLUS #31 $64.22 STEVEN PRIEM
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL 392 $15.22 STEVEN PRIEM
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 WHEELCO BRAKE &SUPPLY ($184.21)STEVEN PRIEM
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 FLEETPRIDE 570 ($2.00)STEVEN PRIEM
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 WHEELCO BRAKE &SUPPLY $235.48 STEVEN PRIEM
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 MILLS FLEET FARM #2,700 $20.83 STEVEN PRIEM
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 AUTO PLUS NO ST PAUL 392 $4.49 STEVEN PRIEM
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 AN FORD WHITE BEAR LAK $465.99 STEVEN PRIEM
06/15/2013 06/17/2013 THE HOME DEPOT 2801 $23.50 KELLY PRINS
06/16/2013 06/21/2013 WALLY'S UPHOLS80110026 $315.53 KELLY PRINS
06/24/2013 06/26/2013 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $19.22 KELLY PRINS
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC $226.40 KELLY PRINS
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 AMERAPRODUCTS INC $53.50 KELLY PRINS
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 UPBEAT $813.15 KELLY PRINS
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 AMERICAN TIME $149.30 KELLY PRINS
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 NOVACARE REHB/HEALT $200.00 TERRIE RAMEAUX
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 HILLYARD INC MINNEAPOLIS $1,076.87 MICHAEL REILLY
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 ORIENTAL TRADING CO $3.99 LORI RESENDIZ
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 ORIENTAL TRADING CO $36.50 LORI RESENDIZ
06/17/2013 06/18/2013 AMAZON.COM $21.26 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/18/2013 06/20/2013 MICHAELS #2744 $55.31 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/20/2013 06/24/2013 STARS & STRIKES ENTERT $841.05 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/24/2013 06/25/2013 WALMART.COM 8009666546 $81.06 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 SKY ZONE - OAKDALE $100.00 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 HOLIDAY INN ELK RIVER $490.56 AUDRA ROBBINS
06/13/2013 06/18/2013 VISTAPR*VISTAPRINT.COM ($133.30)DEB SCHMIDT
06/15/2013 06/17/2013 ON SITE SANITATION INC $841.15 DEB SCHMIDT
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE $108.00 DEB SCHMIDT
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 FINANCE AND COMMERCE INC $114.10 DEB SCHMIDT
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 CVS PHARMACY #1751 Q03 $8.23 DEB SCHMIDT
06/26/2013 06/27/2013 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPE $84.00 DEB SCHMIDT
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 BANNERS.COM $53.58 DEB SCHMIDT
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 ON SITE SANITATION INC $5.95 SCOTT SCHULTZ
06/26/2013 06/28/2013 ON SITE SANITATION INC $1,106.25 SCOTT SCHULTZ
06/17/2013 06/18/2013 USPS 26834500133401316 $138.00 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 ONCE UPON A CHILD - MAPLE $24.85 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 TWIN CITY CLEANERS $181.95 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 USPS 26834500133401316 $46.00 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/19/2013 06/21/2013 ONCE UPON A CHILD - MAPLE $24.56 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/24/2013 06/25/2013 TARGET 00011858 $2.77 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/24/2013 06/25/2013 TARGET 00011858 $9.44 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/25/2013 06/26/2013 PAYPAL *LADYALANNA1 $54.95 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/26/2013 06/26/2013 MY PUBLISHER, INC.$12.84 CAITLIN SHERRILL
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 KEEPRS INC 2 $340.27 JOSEPH STEINER
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 METRO SALES INC $726.75 JOANNE SVENDSEN
Packet Page Number 21 of 275
06/25/2013 06/27/2013 GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT $85.59 RONALD SVENDSEN
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 HD SOD $695.66 JAMES TAYLOR
06/19/2013 06/20/2013 HD SOD $202.47 JAMES TAYLOR
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$36.32 PAUL THEISEN
06/17/2013 06/19/2013 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED INC.$18.50 PAUL THIENES
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 NAT ASSN TOWN WATCH $756.00 PAUL THIENES
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 NAT ASSN TOWN WATCH $35.00 PAUL THIENES
06/18/2013 06/19/2013 NAT ASSN TOWN WATCH ($35.00)PAUL THIENES
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $26.18 KAREN WACHAL
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 $14.72 KAREN WACHAL
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 STREICHER'S MPLS $13.87 JAY WENZEL
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 GANDER MOUNTAIN $169.99 JAY WENZEL
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 TOM S TAILORS $18.00 JAY WENZEL
06/21/2013 06/24/2013 OFFICE MAX $22.98 TAMMY YOUNG
06/14/2013 06/17/2013 GREEN STUFF OUTDOOR SE $62.61 SUSAN ZWIEG
06/20/2013 06/21/2013 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER IN $12.00 SUSAN ZWIEG
06/27/2013 06/28/2013 FEDEXOFFICE 00006171 $66.95 SUSAN ZWIEG
$38,705.73
Packet Page Number 22 of 275
CHECK #CHECK
DATE
EMPLOYE
E NAME
07/05/13 ABEL, CLINT 2,932.08
07/05/13 ALDRIDGE, MARK 3,298.23
07/05/13 SVENDSEN, JOANNE 2,131.82
07/05/13 THOMFORDE, FAITH 1,601.79
07/05/13 PALANK, MARY 1,932.80
07/05/13 POWELL, PHILIP 2,970.49
07/05/13 CORCORAN, THERESA 1,944.19
07/05/13 KVAM, DAVID 4,687.84
07/05/13 VITT, SANDRA 1,119.73
07/05/13 WEAVER, KRISTINE 2,388.99
07/05/13 RICHTER, CHARLENE 1,164.43
07/05/13 SCHOENECKER, LEIGH 1,671.39
07/05/13 MOY, PAMELA 1,636.19
07/05/13 OSTER, ANDREA 1,935.11
07/05/13 LARSON, MICHELLE 1,869.23
07/05/13 MECHELKE, SHERRIE 1,180.32
07/05/13 SCHMIDT, DEBORAH 3,066.11
07/05/13 SPANGLER, EDNA 1,707.05
07/05/13 BEGGS, REGAN 1,550.11
07/05/13 GUILFOILE, KAREN 4,609.10
07/05/13 SINDT, ANDREA 2,218.60
07/05/13 ARNOLD, AJLA 1,649.23
07/05/13 KELSEY, CONNIE 2,626.68
07/05/13 RUEB, JOSEPH 2,801.01
07/05/13 DEBILZAN, JUDY 1,372.40
07/05/13 JACKSON, MARY 2,156.11
07/05/13 BAUMAN, GAYLE 4,756.48
07/05/13 ANDERSON, CAROLE 1,264.53
07/05/13 METRY, THOMAS 720.00
07/05/13 RAMEAUX, THERESE 3,239.85
07/05/13 FARR, LARRY 3,255.27
07/05/13 JAHN, DAVID 1,887.91
07/05/13 KANTRUD, HUGH 184.62
07/05/13 CHRISTENSON, SCOTT 2,177.15
07/05/13 ANTONEN, JAMES 13,332.04
07/05/13 BURLINGAME, SARAH 2,178.90
07/05/13 VALLE, EDWARD 252.50
07/05/13 AHL, R. CHARLES 5,495.72
07/05/13 ROSSBACH, WILLIAM 494.44
07/05/13 CAVE, REBECCA 435.16
07/05/13 JUENEMANN, KATHLEEN 435.16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
AMOUNT
07/05/13 CARDINAL, ROBERT 435.16
07/05/13 KOPPEN, MARVIN 435.16
Packet Page Number 23 of 275
07/05/13 BOURQUIN, RON 913.92
07/05/13 CAPISTRANT, JACOB 553.86
07/05/13 BASSETT, BRENT 391.68
07/05/13 BAUMAN, ANDREW 2,943.20
07/05/13 ANDERSON, BRIAN 553.86
07/05/13 BAHL, DAVID 653.31
07/05/13 WENZEL, JAY 3,115.24
07/05/13 XIONG, KAO 2,918.46
07/05/13 THIENES, PAUL 4,291.05
07/05/13 TRAN, JOSEPH 3,080.97
07/05/13 TAUZELL, BRIAN 3,280.27
07/05/13 THEISEN, PAUL 3,080.97
07/05/13 SYPNIEWSKI, WILLIAM 3,268.00
07/05/13 SZCZEPANSKI, THOMAS 56,730.10
07/05/13 SHORTREED, MICHAEL 4,141.66
07/05/13 STEINER, JOSEPH 3,148.65
07/05/13 REZNY, BRADLEY 4,208.90
07/05/13 RHUDE, MATTHEW 2,918.46
07/05/13 OLSON, JULIE 3,005.47
07/05/13 PARKER, JAMES 2,488.41
07/05/13 METRY, ALESIA 3,194.61
07/05/13 NYE, MICHAEL 3,383.34
07/05/13 MARTIN, JERROLD 3,373.64
07/05/13 MCCARTY, GLEN 3,135.14
07/05/13 LYNCH, KATHERINE 2,759.26
07/05/13 MARINO, JASON 2,999.12
07/05/13 LANGNER, TODD 3,021.58
07/05/13 LU, JOHNNIE 2,991.93
07/05/13 KROLL, BRETT 2,999.12
07/05/13 LANGNER, SCOTT 3,135.14
07/05/13 KONG, TOMMY 2,978.03
07/05/13 KREKELER, NICHOLAS 910.80
07/05/13 JOHNSON, KEVIN 4,211.28
07/05/13 KALKA, THOMAS 954.09
07/05/13 HER, PHENG 2,911.72
07/05/13 HIEBERT, STEVEN 3,326.18
07/05/13 GABRIEL, ANTHONY 3,294.89
07/05/13 HAWKINSON JR, TIMOTHY 2,885.40
07/05/13 FORSYTHE, MARCUS 2,579.82
07/05/13 FRITZE, DEREK 3,522.97
07/05/13 DUGAS, MICHAEL 5,160.08
07/05/13 ERICKSON, VIRGINIA 3,222.23
07/05/13 DEMULLING, JOSEPH 3,188.31
07/05/13 DOBLAR, RICHARD 4,054.83
07/05/13 CARNES, JOHN 2,217.56
07/05/13 CROTTY, KERRY 3,647.20
07/05/13 BIERDEMAN, BRIAN 3,624.79
07/05/13 BUSACK, DANIEL 3,758.70
07/05/13 BELDE, STANLEY 3,060.44
07/05/13 BENJAMIN, MARKESE 2,977.71
07/05/13 BAKKE, LONN 3,238.92
07/05/13 BARTZ, PAUL 3,758.92
Packet Page Number 24 of 275
07/05/13 GERVAIS-JR, CLARENCE 4,035.01
07/05/13 LUKIN, STEVEN 4,674.56
07/05/13 SVENDSEN, RONALD 3,105.08
07/05/13 WHITE, JOEL 220.32
07/05/13 SEDLACEK, JEFFREY 3,004.44
07/05/13 STREFF, MICHAEL 2,861.40
07/05/13 RIEKEN, NICHOLAS 501.84
07/05/13 RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO 146.88
07/05/13 RANK, NATHAN 660.96
07/05/13 RICE, CHRISTOPHER 642.60
07/05/13 POWERS, KENNETH 266.22
07/05/13 RAINEY, JAMES 1,153.62
07/05/13 PETERSON, MARK 496.23
07/05/13 PETERSON, ROBERT 3,251.98
07/05/13 PACHECO, ALPHONSE 725.22
07/05/13 PARROW, JOSHUA 783.36
07/05/13 OLSON, JAMES 2,721.23
07/05/13 OPHEIM, JOHN 178.50
07/05/13 NOVAK, JEROME 3,390.80
07/05/13 NOWICKI, PAUL 223.38
07/05/13 NEILY, STEVEN 278.46
07/05/13 NIELSEN, KENNETH 589.05
07/05/13 MONSON, PETER 33.66
07/05/13 MORGAN, JEFFERY 265.21
07/05/13 MILLER, NICHOLAS 471.24
07/05/13 MONDOR, MICHAEL 3,465.90
07/05/13 LOCHEN, MICHAEL 652.80
07/05/13 MILLER, LADD 1,081.71
07/05/13 KUBAT, ERIC 2,879.17
07/05/13 LINDER, TIMOTHY 2,680.62
07/05/13 KERSKA, JOSEPH 826.20
07/05/13 KONDER, RONALD 486.54
07/05/13 KARRAS, JAMIE 605.88
07/05/13 KELLOGG, JOHNATHAN 156.06
07/05/13 JUREK, GREGORY 2,305.08
07/05/13 KANE, ROBERT 749.70
07/05/13 JANSEN, CHAD 159.12
07/05/13 JONES, JONATHAN 293.76
07/05/13 HAWTHORNE, ROCHELLE 2,414.70
07/05/13 HUTCHINSON, JAMES 828.24
07/05/13 HALE, JOSEPH 485.52
07/05/13 HALWEG, JODI 3,049.37
07/05/13 EVERSON, PAUL 3,231.88
07/05/13 FASULO, WALTER 464.14
07/05/13 DAWSON, RICHARD 3,318.92
07/05/13 EATON, PAUL 514.08
07/05/13 CRUMMY, CHARLES 287.64
07/05/13 DABRUZZI, THOMAS 2,234.45
07/05/13 COREY, ROBERT 593.64
07/05/13 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMON 870.57
07/05/13 CAPISTRANT, JOHN 799.68
07/05/13 CONCHA, DANIEL 397.80
Packet Page Number 25 of 275
07/05/13 BRASH, JASON 2,544.99
07/05/13 CARVER, NICHOLAS 3,284.18
07/05/13 FINWALL, SHANN 3,455.67
07/05/13 MARTIN, MICHAEL 2,799.39
07/05/13 YOUNG, TAMELA 2,084.19
07/05/13 EKSTRAND, THOMAS 3,867.33
07/05/13 KROLL, LISA 1,928.19
07/05/13 THOMPSON, DEBRA 772.20
07/05/13 WACHAL, KAREN 927.30
07/05/13 GAYNOR, VIRGINIA 3,284.18
07/05/13 SANDERS, MARA 177.60
07/05/13 SOUTTER, CHRISTINE 233.75
07/05/13 HAYMAN, JANET 1,241.23
07/05/13 HUTCHINSON, ANN 2,682.02
07/05/13 DEAVER, CHARLES 459.02
07/05/13 GERNES, CAROLE 501.50
07/05/13 RANWEILER, GABRIEL 729.75
07/05/13 BIESANZ, OAKLEY 1,642.08
07/05/13 NORDQUIST, RICHARD 2,178.49
07/05/13 PURVES, JUSTIN 1,564.19
07/05/13 HINNENKAMP, GARY 2,645.12
07/05/13 NAUGHTON, JOHN 2,176.19
07/05/13 HAMRE, MILES 1,630.44
07/05/13 HAYS, TAMARA 1,636.19
07/05/13 BUTTWEILER, TYLER 880.00
07/05/13 GUNDERSON, THOMAS 845.25
07/05/13 JANASZAK, MEGHAN 1,593.79
07/05/13 KONEWKO, DUWAYNE 4,667.89
07/05/13 THOMPSON, MICHAEL 4,686.93
07/05/13 ZIEMAN, SCOTT 1,155.00
07/05/13 LINDBLOM, RANDAL 3,746.97
07/05/13 LOVE, STEVEN 3,629.47
07/05/13 JAROSCH, JONATHAN 2,966.60
07/05/13 KREGER, JASON 3,552.30
07/05/13 ENGSTROM, ANDREW 2,862.43
07/05/13 HANSON, TODD 550.00
07/05/13 BURLINGAME, NATHAN 2,150.40
07/05/13 DUCHARME, JOHN 2,776.80
07/05/13 RUNNING, ROBERT 2,520.27
07/05/13 TEVLIN, TODD 3,071.14
07/05/13 OSWALD, ERICK 3,290.66
07/05/13 RUIZ, RICARDO 1,646.19
07/05/13 MEISSNER, BRENT 2,525.23
07/05/13 NAGEL, BRYAN 3,595.60
07/05/13 EDGE, DOUGLAS 3,337.27
07/05/13 JONES, DONALD 2,176.19
07/05/13 BUCKLEY, BRENT 2,888.42
07/05/13 DEBILZAN, THOMAS 2,176.19
07/05/13 KNUTSON, LOIS 2,084.19
07/05/13 BRINK, TROY 3,388.19
07/05/13 ZWIEG, SUSAN 1,728.41
07/05/13 CORTESI, LUANNE 1,415.56
Packet Page Number 26 of 275
07/05/13 ERICKSON-CLARK, CAROL 37.12
07/05/13 ERICSON, RACHEL 93.00
07/05/13 DUNN, RYAN 1,073.39
07/05/13 EHLE, DANIEL 260.26
07/05/13 CRANDALL, KRISTA 556.50
07/05/13 DEMPSEY, BETH 31.56
07/05/13 BUCKLEY, BRITTANY 682.25
07/05/13 BUTLER, ANGELA 117.00
07/05/13 BESTER, MICHAEL 69.00
07/05/13 BRUSOE, AMY 651.97
07/05/13 BAETZOLD, SETH 117.50
07/05/13 BAUDE, SARAH 50.88
07/05/13 ANDERSON, ALYSSA 226.63
07/05/13 ANDERSON, JOSHUA 485.00
07/05/13 ZIELINSKI, JUDY 30.80
07/05/13 AICHELE, MEGAN 258.38
07/05/13 VANG, TIM 372.00
07/05/13 VUE, LOR PAO 264.68
07/05/13 MUSKAT, JULIE 205.00
07/05/13 PELOQUIN, PENNYE 661.93
07/05/13 KELLEY, CAITLIN 871.75
07/05/13 KULHANEK-DIONNE, ANN 438.50
07/05/13 HOFMEISTER, MARY 1,139.06
07/05/13 HOFMEISTER, TIMOTHY 454.52
07/05/13 GLASS, JEAN 2,151.73
07/05/13 HER, PETER 40.50
07/05/13 CRAWFORD - JR, RAYMON 497.81
07/05/13 EVANS, CHRISTINE 1,430.28
07/05/13 AKEY, SHELLEY 173.13
07/05/13 BERNARDY, CHRISTINE 2,479.65
07/05/13 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 3,384.95
07/05/13 WILBER, JEFFREY 1,627.84
07/05/13 HAAG, MARK 2,585.91
07/05/13 ORE, JORDAN 1,757.05
07/05/13 VUKICH, CANDACE 34.00
07/05/13 ADAMS, DAVID 2,005.01
07/05/13 SHERWOOD, CHRISTIAN 649.00
07/05/13 TAYLOR, JAMES 2,912.48
07/05/13 ROBBINS, AUDRA 3,209.84
07/05/13 ROBBINS, CAMDEN 465.50
07/05/13 MALLET, AMANDA 740.00
07/05/13 PROHOFSKY, SARAH 112.00
07/05/13 LARSON, KATELYN 504.00
07/05/13 LARSON, TRISTA 639.00
07/05/13 BRENEMAN, NEIL 2,296.28
07/05/13 COLE, BENJAMIN 384.00
07/05/13 BERGER, STEPHANIE 296.88
07/05/13 BJORK, BRANDON 1,120.00
07/05/13 WELLENS, MOLLY 1,835.55
07/05/13 ACEITUNO, FELIPE 35.00
07/05/13 FISHER, DAVID 4,230.77
07/05/13 SWAN, DAVID 2,802.59
Packet Page Number 27 of 275
07/05/13 DYER, KATELYN 76.50
07/05/13 MAIDMENT, COLIN 184.88
07/05/13 CRAWFORD, SHAWN 480.00
07/05/13 DOUGLASS, TOM 2,102.43
07/05/13 LANGER, KAYLYN 91.38
07/05/13 BORCHERT, JONATHAN 212.50
07/05/13 BOSLEY, CAROL 94.50
07/05/13 HITE, ANDREA 297.00
07/05/13 WEINHAGEN, SHELBY 136.00
07/05/13 YUNKER, JOSEPH 64.00
07/05/13 TUPY, MARCUS 71.25
07/05/13 WARNER, CAROLYN 158.40
07/05/13 TRUE, ANDREW 582.24
07/05/13 TUPY, HEIDE 68.70
07/05/13 THORWICK, MEGAN 36.75
07/05/13 TREPANIER, TODD 201.25
07/05/13 SYME, ABBEY 101.88
07/05/13 SYME, LAUREN 111.74
07/05/13 SMITH, CASEY 373.48
07/05/13 SMITLEY, SHARON 330.25
07/05/13 SCHUNEMAN, GREGORY 448.45
07/05/13 SMITH, ANN 123.30
07/05/13 ROLLERSON, TERRANCE 15.00
07/05/13 SCHREIER, ROSEMARIE 301.25
07/05/13 RESENDIZ, LORI 2,402.01
07/05/13 RICHTER, DANIEL 113.40
07/05/13 POVLITZKI, MARINA 19.00
07/05/13 PROESCH, ANDY 1,147.05
07/05/13 NITZ, CARA 154.00
07/05/13 NORTHOUSE, KATHERINE 385.40
07/05/13 NADEAU, KELLY 42.75
07/05/13 NADEAU, TAYLOR 317.96
07/05/13 LAMSON, ELIANA 27.00
07/05/13 MCCOMAS, LEAH 168.00
07/05/13 LAMEYER, BRENT 181.25
07/05/13 LAMEYER, ZACHARY 464.56
07/05/13 KOHLER, ROCHELLE 74.00
07/05/13 KOZDROJ, GABRIELLA 50.00
07/05/13 JOHNSON, BARBARA 305.60
07/05/13 JOYER, ANTHONY 66.60
07/05/13 HOLMBERG, LADONNA 506.01
07/05/13 HORWATH, RONALD 2,772.88
07/05/13 HASSAN, KIANA 202.25
07/05/13 HEINRICH, SHEILA 366.02
07/05/13 GRAY, MEGAN 636.95
07/05/13 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA 222.25
07/05/13 GADOW, VERONIKA 510.54
07/05/13 GIEL, NICOLE 52.94
07/05/13 FOX, KELLY 60.00
07/05/13 FRAMPTON, SAMANTHA 400.75
07/05/13 FLORES, LUIS 44.00
07/05/13 FONTAINE, KIM 634.63
Packet Page Number 28 of 275
9989413
9989414
9989415
9989416
9989417
9989418
9989419
9989420
9989421
9989422
9989423 07/05/13 STEFFEN, MICHAEL 102.00
588,035.45
07/05/13 RANGEL, SAMANTHA 94.00
07/05/13 CUSICK, JESSICA 318.75
07/05/13 SMITH, JEROME 91.00
07/05/13 WALES, ABIGAIL 274.33
07/05/13 SCOTT, HALEY 110.90
07/05/13 SKUNES, KELLY 729.38
07/05/13 SCHREIER, ABIGAIL 340.86
07/05/13 SCHREIER, ZACHARY 255.00
07/05/13 CHRISTOPHER, KYLE 336.00
07/05/13 O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH 93.00
07/05/13 FOWLDS, MYCHAL 4,072.29
07/05/13 FRANZEN, NICHOLAS 2,789.40
07/05/13 WOEHRLE, MATTHEW 2,399.09
07/05/13 BERGO, CHAD 2,741.49
07/05/13 AICHELE, CRAIG 2,231.39
07/05/13 PRIEM, STEVEN 2,448.89
07/05/13 COUNTRYMAN, BRENDA 1,280.00
07/05/13 SWANSON, CHRIS 1,548.99
07/05/13 SPEARS, SHYTIANA 261.38
07/05/13 THOMPSON, BENJAMIN 348.50
07/05/13 REILLY, MICHAEL 1,962.59
07/05/13 SINDT, DARIEN 212.50
07/05/13 MALONEY, SHAUNA 349.25
07/05/13 PRINS, KELLY 1,871.89
Packet Page Number 29 of 275
Check Description Amount
90281 02464 FUNDS FOR ATMS 10,000.00
90282 00111 PATROL HOURS 6/17 - 6/30 1,382.50
90283 00223 RETIREMENT PLAQUE - BOHL 280.00
90284 05028 CITY HALL SOLAR SYSTEM LEASE-JULY 397.00
05028 MCC SOLAR SYSTEM LEASE - JULY 369.00
90285 01202 MAPLEWOOD MONTHLY - JULY 7,454.41
90286 01819 LOCAL PHONE SERVICE 05/15 - 06/14 721.96
90287 01337 911 DISPATCH SERVICES - JUNE 28,851.06
01337 FLEET SUPPORT FEE - JUNE 458.64
90288 01409 ENGINEERING FEES PD EXPANSION PROJ 8,992.55
01409 ENGINEERING FEES PD EXPANSION PROJ 6,646.77
90289 03178 INSTRUCTION FOR DAYCAMP 230.00
90290 02274 SPRINT SRVS 05/15 - 06/14 5,439.68
90291 01574 BITUMINOUS PURCHASES~817.39
01574 RECYCLED BASE - TEMP ROAD AT PD 791.99
90292 04192 EMS BILLING - JUNE 3,272.86
90293 01974 REFUND FOR TRANS MEDIC 278.06
90294 03486 BLACK DIRT FOR TOM KELLY FIELD 192.38
90295 03310 SMARTNET RENEWAL/NETWORK EQUIP 9,051.78
90296 00279 CONCRETE FOR 3003 MEYER CT 654.08
90297 05203 INSTRUCTION OF LINE DANCE 241.80
90298 00412 BOOKS FOR MANAGEMENT CLASS 89.71
90299 05207 APPLICANT BACKGROUND CHECKS 50.11
90300 01401 DAY CAMP BUS FEE - HOIDAY INN MPLS 290.00
01401 DAY CAMP BUS FEE - STARS & STRIKES 227.50
01401 DAY CAMP BUS FEE - PUMP IT UP 165.00
90301 04337 TRASH PUMP RENTAL-ROSELAWN POND 996.08
90302 03906 CONCRETE WORK AT 1902 10,203.00
90303 00671 FIELDMARK WHITE TOTE FOR FIELDS 1,469.53
90304 03597 REIMB FOR MILEAGE 5/23 - 7/8 13.84
90305 00827 CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE C0009643 5,552.89
90306 02336 FITNESS CONSULTANT SRVS 2ND QTR 1,100.00
90307 05222 PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT FOR PD 1,300.00
90308 03910 REPAIR HEATING CIRCULATION PUMP 5,279.37
90309 04193 FORFEITED VEHICLE STORAGE - MAY 2,400.00
90310 00993 SCANNING OF HOUSE FILES - CYCLE 10 4,803.37
00993 SCANNING OF HOUSE FILES - CYCLE 7 4,792.23
00993 SCANNING OF HOUSE FILES - CYCLE 9 4,788.75
00993 SCANNING OF HOUSE FILES - CYCLE 8 4,528.84
90311 04966 SPECIAL ORDER PAINT FOR NEW TRUCK 544.00
90312 00001 REFUND J HOLLMAN - CAMP 370.00
90313 00001 REFUND J HARRIS - CAMP 185.00
90314 00001 REFUND S MORGAN - CAMP 185.00
90315 00001 REFUND B FYKSEN - KARATE 63.00
90316 04276 INSTRUCTION ART CLASSES 3/28-5/2 816.00
04276 INSTRUCTION ART CLASSES 1/17-2/21 624.00
04276 INSTRUCTION ART CLASSES 3/30-5/4 576.00
04276 INSTRUCTION ART CLASSES 1/19-2/23 288.00
90317 01359 VEHICLE WASHES - JUNE 102.00
90318 00198 WATER UTILITY 80.88
90319 04154 TRAINING ON LINE 7/1/13 - 6/30/14 4,845.00
90320 01597 SCREENER RENTAL 3,078.00
90321 04104 MCC EQUIP UPGRADE APPLICATION #3 65,270.25
90322 01649 CHAINSAW/CHAPS/CHAIN & PARTS 1,163.87
90323 04357 EQUIP REPAIR & UPDATE 175.50
90324 02464 PAYING AGENT FEES 425.00
90325 04381 FOOD FOR POLICE K9'S 969.60
07/16/2013 US BANK
07/16/2013 ZEUS AND COMPANY - NORTH
214,335.23
45 Checks in this report.
07/16/2013 TRANE U.S. INC.
07/16/2013 TRI-STATE BOBCAT, INC.
07/16/2013 UNIVERSAL HOSPITAL SRVS, INC.
07/16/2013 ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SRVS
07/16/2013 TARGET SOLUTIONS
07/16/2013 THECO INC.
07/16/2013 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
07/16/2013 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
07/16/2013 REGAL AUTO WASH BILLING
07/16/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/16/2013 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
07/16/2013 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC
07/16/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/16/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/16/2013 ONE TIME VENDOR
07/16/2013 MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
07/16/2013 MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
07/16/2013 MIDWAY FORD
07/16/2013 MIDAMERICA AUCTIONS, INC.
07/16/2013 MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
07/16/2013 MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
07/16/2013 M A TAYLOR INC
07/16/2013 MARTIN-MCALLISTER
07/16/2013 METRO MECH CONTRACTORS, INC.
07/16/2013 HIRSHFIELD'S
07/16/2013 MARY JO HOFMEISTER
07/16/2013 L M C I T
07/16/2013 FIRST STUDENT INC
07/16/2013 GARY CARLSON EQUIPMENT
07/16/2013 GOODMANSON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
07/16/2013 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES
07/16/2013 FIRST STUDENT INC
07/16/2013 FIRST STUDENT INC
07/16/2013 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.
07/16/2013 DANCE & ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
07/16/2013 DONALD SALVERDA & ASSOCIATES
07/16/2013 BLUE CROSS REFUNDS
07/16/2013 BUBERL BLACK DIRT INC
07/16/2013 CDW GOVERNMENT INC
07/16/2013 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
07/16/2013 T A SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC
07/16/2013 TRANS-MEDIC
07/16/2013 S E H
07/16/2013 SCIENCE EXPLORERS, INC.
07/16/2013 SPRINT
07/16/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/16/2013 RAMSEY COUNTY-PROP REC & REV
07/16/2013 S E H
07/16/2013 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES SOLAR, LLC
07/16/2013 NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO INC
07/16/2013 PAETEC
07/16/2013 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
07/16/2013 BRODIN STUDIOS, INC.
07/16/2013 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES SOLAR, LLC
Check Register
City of Maplewood
07/12/2013
Date Vendor
07/11/2013 US BANK
Packet Page Number 30 of 275
Settlement
Date Payee Description Amount
7/8/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 55,612.60
7/8/2013 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 2,320.95
7/8/2013 U.S. Treasurer Federal Payroll Tax 107,236.40
7/8/2013 P.E.R.A.P.E.R.A.88,477.76
7/8/2013 ICMA (Vantagepointe)Deferred Compensation 29,569.50
7/8/2013 ING - State Plan Deferred Compensation 128,875.22
7/9/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 26,729.61
7/9/2013 MidAmerica - ING HRA Flex plan 15,714.18
7/9/2013 Labor Unions Union Dues 1,875.70
7/9/2013 MN State Treasurer State Payroll Tax 21,557.17
7/10/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 45,913.30
7/11/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 33,041.89
7/12/2013 MN State Treasurer Drivers License/Deputy Registrar 40,270.13
7/12/2013 MN Dept of Natural Resources DNR electronic licenses 1,779.00
7/12/2013 Optum Health DCRP & Flex plan payments 3,957.17
602,930.58
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
Disbursements via Debits to Checking account
Packet Page Number 31 of 275
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
David Fisher, Interim Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review, All Metro Glass
LOCATION: 1357 Cope Avenue
DATE: July 16, 2013
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for All Metro Glass at 1357 Cope Avenue is due for its annual review.
The CUP allows for a window and door fabrication/installation business. In addition to the CUP, the city
council at its meeting on July 25, 2011 approved a parking reduction for this site and design and
landscaping plans.
BACKGROUND
On July 25, 2011, the city council approved a conditional use permit, a parking reduction of 66 spaces and
design and landscaping plans.
On July 23, 2012, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year
Code Requirement
Section 44-1100(a) of the zoning code states that CUPs shall be reviewed by the city council within one year
of approval. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite term for a subsequent review or a
specific term not to exceed five years.
DISCUSSION
All Metro Glass has completed all construction and landscaping. There is a decorative screening wall still
to be completed. Mike McGrath, vice president of operations, stated to city staff that the wall will be
complete in six weeks. Staff has not heard any neighborhood complaints or concerns. Staff
recommends reviewing this permit again in one year to ensure the landscaping has survived and all other
conditions of approval continue to be met.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit All Metro Glass in one year.
p:sec10/All Metro Glass CUP Review_072213
Attachments:
1. Location/Zoning Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
3. Site/Landscaping Plan
4. City Council Minutes, July 25, 2011
5. CUP Resolution
Agenda Item G2
Packet Page Number 32 of 275
Packet Page Number 109 of 206Packet Page Number 33 of 275
Packet Page Number 110 of 206Packet Page Number 34 of 275
Packet Page Number 111 of 206Packet Page Number 35 of 275
Attachment 4
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, July 25, 2011
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 14-11
J. NEW BUSINESS
2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit Revision, Parking Reduction Waiver and
Design Review Former Corner Kick Soccer Center, 1357 Cope Avenue
Senior Planner Ekstrand gave the report. Planning Commissioner Al Bierbaum spoke. Matt
Ledvina from the Community Design Review Board addressed the council. Mike McGrath,
owner of the building located at 1357 Cope Avenue addressed the council.
Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit Revision, Parking
Reduction Waiver and Design Review Former Corner Kick Soccer Center, 1357 Cope Avenue
with the following condition added. The uses of the building shall be restricted to those that
would generate the amount of parking that is available on the site.
Seconded by Councilmember Llanas Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 36 of 275
Attachment 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mike McGrath requested a revision to the conditional use permit for the former Corner Kick
Soccer Center to make exterior building and site renovations because the proposed building
improvements are taking place within 350 feet of residential property.
WHEREAS, Section 44-637(b) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit for any building or
exterior use in the M-1 zoning district if it is within 350 feet of a residential district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 1357 Cope Avenue legally described as:
10-29-22-32-00-14
IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, EXCEPT WEST 398 FT; THE PARTS OF HWY 36 &
WEST RAILROAD R/W (Bruce Vento Trail) OF THE NW ¼ OF SW 14 (SUBJECT TO ROAD)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On July 5, 2011, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice
in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave
persons at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The commission also
considered reports and recommendations of the city staff. The planning commission
recommended that the city council approve the conditional use permit revision.
2. On July 25, 2011 the city council discussed the proposed conditional use permit revision. They
considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above-described conditional
use permit revision for the following reasons:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site’s natural and scenic
features into the development design.
Packet Page Number 37 of 275
9. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the plans date-stamped May 17, 2011. The city council shall review
any major changes proposed. Staff may approve minor changes.
2. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
3. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of the city engineer, building official and fire
marshal.
4. The applicant shall revise the landscaping plan for staff approval to provide for a visual buffer
along the frontage of the property between the two driveways to block headlights from shining
into neighboring properties. This buffer shall be at least three to four feet tall.
5. Site lights and noise shall be controlled to follow the requirements of the city ordinance.
6. This permit includes a parking waiver for the applicant to provide 60 parking spaces with the
potential for 23 additional future spaces. If further spaces are needed, the applicant shall
restripe the parking lot to provide at least 15 additional spaces at the ends of the proposed
parking rows.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on July 25, 2011.
Packet Page Number 38 of 275
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
Dave Fisher, Interim Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review, South Metro Human Services Mental
Health Care Facility
LOCATION: 1111 Viking Drive
DATE: July 16, 2013
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for South Metro Human Services at 1111 Viking Drive is due
for its annual review. The CUP allows South Metro Human Services to operate the Community
Foundations program, a mental health care facility with temporary housing for 16 patients, at the
former Ethan Allen furniture store. The city ordinance required a CUP for the housing portion of
this proposal. The counseling, clinic and office uses are allowed by ordinance.
BACKGROUND
On July 25, 2011, the city council approved a conditional use permit, a parking reduction of 21
spaces and design and landscaping plans.
On July 23, 2012, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
Code Requirement
Section 44-1100(a) of the zoning code states that CUPs shall be reviewed by the city council
within one year of approval. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite term
for a subsequent review or a specific term not to exceed five years.
DISCUSSION
South Metro Human Services has completed all of its renovation work and has occupied the
building. Staff is not aware of any neighborhood complaints or concerns at this point. During
staff’s inspection of the site it found two trash containers in the driveway. The July 25, 2011
design approval for this project contained the following condition:
“As required by ordinance, if outdoor trash storage is used in the future, the applicant
must provide a screening enclosure to keep the dumpster in. The location and design
plans shall be subject to staff approval.”
Staff will work with the applicant to ensure a trash enclosure is built and it is recommended the
council review this permit again in one year.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for South Metro Human Services again in one year.
p:sec9\South Metro CUP Review_072213
Attachments:
1. Location/Zoning Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
3. Site Plan
4. City Council Minutes, July 25, 2011
Agenda Item G3
Packet Page Number 39 of 275
Packet Page Number 138 of 206Packet Page Number 40 of 275
Packet Page Number 139 of 206Packet Page Number 41 of 275
Packet Page Number 140 of 206Packet Page Number 42 of 275
Attachment 4
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, July 25, 2011
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 14-11
J. NEW BUSINESS
3. Approval of Conditional Use Permit, Design Review and Parking Reduction
Authorization for South Metro Human Services Mental Health Care Facility, 1111
Viking Drive
Senior Planner Ekstrand gave the report. Planning Commissioner Al Bierbaum spoke. Matt
Senior Planner Ekstrand gave the staff report. Matt Ledvina from the Community Design Review
Board addressed the council. Planning Commissioner Al Bierbaum spoke. The following people
spoke:
1. Ken Frigstad, Maplewood
2. John Wycoff, Maplewood
3. Bob Zick, North St. Paul
4. Don Huot, Maplewood
5. Terry Schneider, Conditional Use Permit Applicant
6. Dick Seppala, Maplewood
7. Ken Frigstad, Maplewood – second appearance
Councilmember Llanas moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit, Design Review and
Parking Reduction Authorization for South Metro Human Services Mental Health Care Facility,
1111 Viking Drive as amended.
RESOLUTION 11-7-602A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, South Metro Human Services has applied for a conditional use permit to
operate the Community Foundations program, a mental health care facility with temporary
housing for 16 patients.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit
for residential programs in zoning districts where they are not specifically prohibited.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1111 Viking Drive. The legal
description is:
The North 55 rods of the West 32 rods of the Southeast ¼ of Section 9, Township
29, Range 22, except portions taken by the State of Minnesota for highway
purposes. Above property is subject to a cartway over and across North 16 feet,
more or less, thereof.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
Packet Page Number 43 of 275
Attachment 4
1. On July 5, 2011, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning
commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The planning commission also considered the report and recommendation of city staff. The
planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On July 25, 2011, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approved the above-
described conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to
any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or
air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. Staff may approve minor
changes.
2. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Before the applicant obtains a building permit, they shall sign an agreement with the city
agreeing to pay an annual assessment of $1,000 per year for ten years to defray the cost of
police calls to the facility.
Packet Page Number 44 of 275
Attachment 4
5. Additional housing units cannot be added without a revision of this permit.
6. The applicant shall provide on-site staffing 24 hours a day and 365 days a year, this is to
ensure the health and safety of the residents in accordance with Minnesota Statute Section
245A.11.
7. This conditional use permit is granted based on the pertinent requirements of federal and
state laws, which are Minnesota Statute Section 245A.11 and the requirements of the FHA, the
FHAA and the ADA (the Fair Housing Act, the Fair Housing Act Amendment of 1988 and the
American’s with Disabilities Act) which all have requirements about accommodations for people
with disabilities in various ways.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on July 25, 2011.
Seconded by Councilmember Nephew Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 45 of 275
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
David Fisher, Interim Community Development Director
SUBJECT: St. Paul’s Priory Planned Unit Development Review
DATE: July 16, 2013
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit (CUP) for the St. Paul’s Monastery planned unit development (PUD)
at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue East is due for its annual review. The PUD allowed the
development of the monastery property with the following uses:
• A 40-unit senior-housing apartment building to be operated by CommonBond Communities.
• A 50-unit town house development also to be built and operated by CommonBond.
• A conversion of the monastery to a family-violence shelter by the Tubman Family Alliance.
• A new monastery on the north end of the property.
BACKGROUND
May 14, 2007: The city council approved this PUD and the preliminary plat for Century Trails
Commons, the town house complex. Refer to the attached city council minutes.
February 12, 2008: The community design review board (CDRB) approved the design plans for
the new monastery.
April 14, 2008: The city council approved the final plat for Century Trails Commons.
April 22, 2008: The CDRB approved the design plans for the Century Trails Commons town
homes.
July 27, 2009: The city council approved the design plans and a revision to the PUD allowing
unit sizes that are less than the required 580-square-foot minimum as stated in the zoning
ordinance for the CommonBond Communities senior housing apartment building.
July 12, 2010: The city council approved revised landscape plans.
On July 26, 2010, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
On July 25, 2011, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
On July 23, 2012, the city council reviewed the CUP and agreed to review it again in one year.
On May 13, 2013, the city council approved a CUP revision to allow the Tubman Family Alliance
to utilize the two upper floors in order to expand the shelter housing and services.
Agenda Item G4
Packet Page Number 46 of 275
Code Requirement
Section 44-1100(a) of the zoning code states that CUPs shall be reviewed by the city council
within one year of approval. At the one-year review, the council may specify an indefinite term
for a subsequent review or a specific term not to exceed five years.
DISCUSSION
The monastery, 50-unit Trails Edge Town Homes and 40-unit Century Trails Senior Housing
Apartments are complete. The Tubman Family Alliance received council approval earlier this
year to expand its shelter and services into the upper two floors of its buildings. Staff is not
aware of any neighborhood complaints or concerns. The city council should review this permit
in one year to check on the progress of the remaining elements of this PUD.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit for the St. Paul’s Monastery PUD in one year.
p:sec13-29\Priory\priory pud annual rev_072213
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. May 14, 2007 City Council Minutes
3. July 27, 2009 City Council Minutes
4. May 13, 2013 City Council Minutes
5. Site Plan
Packet Page Number 47 of 275
Location / Zoning Map2675 Larpenteur Ave ESt Paul's Monastery
´Attachment 1
page #2SITEHill-MurrayHigh School St Paul's Monastery
Packet Page Number 48 of 275
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, May 14, 2007
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 07-09
2. St. Paul’s Monastery Redevelopment (Century and Larpenteur Avenues) Public
Comment on this matter was taken at a Special City Council Meeting on May 7,
2007. Public Comment is now closed. Discussion is limited to City Council questions
for City Staff.
a. Application for Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development
b. Preliminary Plat for Century Trails Commons
Senior Planner Ekstrand presented the report and responded to questions from the
council.
Ellen Higgins, in charge of development for Common Bond Communities,
addressed the council regarding the proposed affordable housing.
Mayor Longrie thanked Ms. Higgins for her suggestion that a transportation task
force be created to work toward increasing public transportation to this site. Mayor
Longrie stated her support for increasing transportation on the site and creating a
task force to look at these issues.
Councilmember Hjelle
That part of the South ½ of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, Township 29, Range 22,
Ramsey County, Minnesota lying east and north of a line described as beginning at a point
on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13 985 feet west of the southeast
corner of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13; thence 78 degrees 40 minutes to the right
proceeding in a north-northwesterly direction for 620 feet to a point of curve; thence to the
left on a curve having a radius of 100 feet a distance of 157.08 feet to a point of tangent;
thence 90 degrees to the right, at right angles to the tangent to said curve at said point of
moved to adopt the following resolution approving a conditional use
permit for a planned unit development for the Sisters of St. Benedict of St. Paul’s
Monastery.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION 07-05-071
WHEREAS, the Sisters of St. Benedict of St. Paul’s Monastery applied for a conditional use
permit for a planned unit development to develop their 31.04-acre site with a 50 -unit town
house development; a 40-unit seniors housing apartment building; to convert the existing
monastery building as a multi-use family-violence shelter with 37 housing units, offices and
support facilities and to build a future monastery building on the north end of their property.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit for
institutions of any educational, philanthropic and charitable nature.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue. The
legal description is:
Packet Page Number 49 of 275
tangent, a distance of 450 feet; thence 90 degrees to the left a distance of 200 feet; thence
90 degrees to the right a distance of 225 feet, more or less, to the north line of said South ½
of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13.
Except that part of the Southeast Quarter of said Southeast Quarter of Section 13
which lies northeasterly of a line parallel with and distant 100 feet southwesterly of a
line described as beginning at a point on the east line of said Section 13, distant
1324.13 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence run westerly at an angle
of 90 degrees with said east section line for 186.63 feet; thence deflect to the right
on a 10 degree curve, delta angle 29 degrees 20 minutes, for 293.33 feet; thence on
tangent to said curve for 100 feet and there terminating;
together with all that part of the above described tract, adjoining and southerly of the
above described strip, which lies easterly of a line run parallel with and distant 60
feet westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the point of intersection of
the above described line with the east line of said Section 13; thence run southerly
along the east line of said Section 13 for 540 feet and there terminating;
also together with a triangular piece adjoining and southerly of the first above
described strip and westerly of the last described strip, which lies northeasterly of
the following described line: From a point on the last described line, distant 150 feet
southerly of its point of beginning, run westerly at right angles to said line for 60 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence run northwesterly to a
point on the southerly boundary of the first above described strip, distant 100 feet
westerly of its intersection with a line run parallel with and distant 33 westerly of the
east line of said Section 13.
Which lies easterly, northerly and easterly of a line described as commencing at said
southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13; thence westerly, along said south
line of the Southeast Quarter of Section 13, a distance of 832.02 feet to the point of
beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting to the right 78 degrees 40 minutes
00 seconds a distance of 750.06 feet; thence deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes
00 seconds a distance of 204.00 feet; thence deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes
00 seconds a distance of 638.98 feet to said north line of the south half of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 13 and said line there terminating.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On March 20, 2007, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The planning commission also considered the reports and
recommendation of city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city
council approve this permit.
2. On May 7, 2007, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-described
conditional use permit, because:
Packet Page Number 50 of 275
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust,
odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general
unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and
scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Packet Page Number 51 of 275
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. This planned unit development shall follow the concept plans date-stamped January
11, 2007. These plans are considered concept plans because the applicant must
submit design plans to the city for approval for the proposed apartments, town
houses, future monastery; shelter and any other future use. Staff may approve
minor changes.
2. This planned unit development does not give any approvals for Lot 1, Block 1 since
this site has not been proposed for any future development and its future use is
unknown. The development of this site would require a revision of this planned unit
development and must comply with all city development requirements.
3. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of council
approval or the permit shall become null and void.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5. The property owner shall be required to dedicate right of way for a roadway to be
studied by the City Engineer during the next three to five year period. The final
location of the roadway shall be studied by the City Engineer and reported with a
recommendation to the city council. The final need for the roadway has not been
determined but will likely be necessary if additional development occurs on this
property in excess of that currently being proposed or at higher density levels than
approved; and also if property sold includes a major expansion of uses that
generate significant additional traffic to be generated at Hill-Murray.
6. The applicant must obtain all necessary and required permits from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation, Ramsey County and the Ramsey-Washington Metro
Watershed District.
7. The applicant must provide a right-turn lane on Century Avenue into the site, subject
to MnDOT’s approval.
8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the engineering reports by Erin
Laberee and Michael Thompson dated February 22, 2007 and by R. Charles Ahl
dated April 19, 2007.
9. The applicant shall install sidewalks wherever possible along Larpenteur Avenue.
10. Staff may approve minor changes to the plans.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
A friendly amendment was added to the motion requiring the following conditions be
included in the resolution:
11. Establish a neighborhood committee of no less than nine members whose
membership composite shall be one representative from Hill-Murray administration
or trustees, one day care parent from Maple Tree Day Care, one parent whose child
Packet Page Number 52 of 275
attends Hill-Murray, three neighborhood citizens who signed the petition included in
the council packet and three neighborhood citizens who are from the yellow cards
received by the city. The committee’s purpose shall be to facilitate communication,
develop neighborhood solutions to neighborhood concerns, and provide feedback to
all parties subject to the planned unit development. The committee shall report
periodically to the council and disband when no longer needed.
12. Establish a transportation task force of neighbors and parties to the planned unit
development to work on public transportation service and options for the site, to
work in coordination with the neighborhood committee.
13. The proposed project shall be reviewed by the Community Design Review Board
and all requirements of that board shall be followed.
14. Include two playground areas within the planned unit development as discussed at
the hearing that were to be added to the plans.
15. Develop a security plan in partnership with all of the parties subject to the planned
unit development and the neighborhood committee.
16. Monastery Way and Bennett Road shall be public roads and the cost of city sewer,
storm water, public street infrastructure and city water shall be borne by the
developer.
17. The applicant shall install sidewalks along applicant’s property on Larpenteur
Avenue and internal streets.
The council voted as follows: Ayes-all
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on May 14, 2007.
Councilmember Hjelle
5. The property owner shall be required to dedicate right-of -way for a roadway to be
studied by the City Engineer during the next three to five year period. The final
location of the roadway shall be studied by the City Engineer and reported with a
moved approval of a preliminary plat for Century Trails Commons
located at 2675 Larpenteur Avenue. Approval is subject to:
1. Redesigning the public street right-of-way within the site to be 60 feet wide.
2. Complying with the applicable requirements of the engineering reports by Erin
Laberee
and Michael Thompson dated February 22, 2007 and by R. Charles Ahl dated April
19, 2007.
3. Street lights shall be installed if required by the city engineer, subject to his
approval.
4. The applicant shall dedicate any additional right-of-way if required by Ramsey
County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Packet Page Number 53 of 275
recommendation to the city council. The final need for the roadway has not been
determined but will likely be necessary if additional development occurs on this
property in excess of that currently being proposed or at higher density levels than
approved; and also if property sold includes a major expansion of uses that
generate significant additional traffic to be generated at Hill-Murray.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes-all
Packet Page Number 54 of 275
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
6:30 p.m., Monday, July 27, 2009
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 15-09
(THIS ITEM WAS HEARD OUT OF ORDER PER THE COUNCIL MOTION)
L6. Planned Unit Development Revision For Century Trails Apartments By CommonBond
Communities
a. Senior Planner, Tom Ekstrand gave the report and answered questions of the council.
Mayor Longrie asked if anyone wanted to address the council to come forward.
1. JudyWordock, Housing Development Manager, CommonBond Communities.
2. Paul Holmes, Architect with Pope Architects.
3. Gary Pearson, Planning Commission member gave the planning commission report.
4. Carolyn Peterson, 1801 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood.
Councilmember Nephew moved to approve the Planned Unit Development Revision For Century
Trails Apartments By CommonBond Communities. To also include recommendations from the
Planning Commission and Community Design Review Board.
RESOLUTION 09-07-225
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, CommonBond Communities applied for a revision of the conditional use permit for a planned
unit development (PUD) for the St. Paul’s Monastery development plan. This PUD included a 40-unit senior
housing apartment building as part of the development project.
WHEREAS, CommonBond Communities has requested approval to build apartment units that have
unit size reductions ranging from 550 square feet to 575 square feet of gross floor area with a maximum of 540
square feet or net habitable area which is less than the required 580 square foot minimum area stipulated by
city ordinance.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1093(b) of the city ordinances states that the city council may grant deviations from
the city ordinance as part of a PUD.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at the southwest corner of Benet Road and Century
Avenue. The legal description is:
Lot 1, Block 2, CENTURY TRAILS COMMONS
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On July 7, 2009, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning
commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The planning commission also considered the reports and recommendation of city staff. The
planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On July 27, 2009, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning
commission.
Packet Page Number 55 of 275
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council passed the above-described conditional use
permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
1. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to
any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or
air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 56 of 275
Attachment 4
MINUTES
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m., Monday, May 13, 2013
Council Chambers, City Hall
Meeting No. 09-13
J. NEW BUSINESS
3. Conditional Use Permit Revision for the Tubman Center East Planned Unit
Development, 1725 Monastery Way (Simple Majority Vote Required to
Approve)
Senior Planner Ekstrand gave the staff report.
Councilmember Juenemann moved to approve the Resolution, with revisions to number
six as requested by the applicant, amending the Conditional Use Permit the St. Paul’s
Priory planned unit development which allowed the Tubman Family Shelter facility in the
former monastery building located at 1725 Monastery Way.
RESOLUTION 13-5-913
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
REVISION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Harriet Tubman Center East has applied to revised the
conditional use permit for a planned unit development that included the development of
the former 31-acre St. Paul’s Priory site. This development included a 50-unit town
house development; a 40-unit seniors housing apartment building; the conversion of the
former monastery into a multi-use family-violence shelter for Tubman and a future
monastery building on the north end of their property.
WHEREAS, the Harriet Tubman Center East is requesting amendment of this
permit to expand their services and shelter housing. The shelter housing will expand to
occupy the upper two floors of the building. The expanded services and programming
will include the following uses: temporary shelter housing, legal services, counseling
services, youth and family services, community training and education, child care,
creative art studios and administrative offices. In addition to those, Tubman would add
therapeutic and community gardens, a bus shelter for the community and Tubman
clients, a community health clinic which will work in collaboration with Tubman
counseling services, and renew the existing commercial kitchen to provide meals to
Tubman residents and other facility users as well as partner with a community college
and others to provide training in basic food preparation.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use
permit for institutions of any educational, philanthropic and charitable nature.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1725 Monastery Way.
The legal description is:
Lot 2, Block 1, St. Paul’s Monastery
Packet Page Number 57 of 275
Attachment 4
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On May 7, 2013, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff
published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property
owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The planning commission also
considered the reports and recommendation of city staff. The planning
commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On May 13, 2013, the city council considered reports and recommendations of
the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above-
described conditional use permit revision, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be
in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding
area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods
of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or
cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare,
smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off,
vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would
not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including
streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems,
schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or
services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural
and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. This planned unit development shall follow the concept plans date-stamped
January 11, 2007 and the subsequent, specific design approvals for new town
homes, apartments and monastery approved by the community design review
board. Staff may approve minor changes.
Packet Page Number 58 of 275
Attachment 4
2. This planned unit development does not give any approvals for Lot 1, Block 1
since this site has not been proposed for any future development and its future
use is unknown. The development of this site would require a revision of this
planned unit development and must comply with all city development
requirements.
3. This permit revision allows the Tubman Center East to expand their shelter
housing to the remaining two upper floors in the building. This permit also
permits the applicant’s support activities such as: a legal center, offices,
counseling services group rooms, child care, playground, classrooms, community
gathering spaces, space for collaborative community partnerships, community
gardens, bus shelters and expanded use of the commercial kitchen for residents
and other facility users and collaborative community groups.
4. The applicant shall work with city staff to on the placement and possible
screening of future community gardens.
5. The applicant shall work with city staff on the appearance and location of bus
shelters. These bus shelters may require the review and approval of the
community design review board.
6. The applicant shall work to inform, educate, and encourage their residents and
staff to park in Tubman parking lots and abide by all Maplewood parking
regulations. City staff will monitor this and if parking issues continue the City
Council may consider requiring the property owner increase on-site parking to
meet the needs of facility users.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on May 13, 2013.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes – All
The motion passed.
Packet Page Number 59 of 275
Packet Page Number 60 of 275
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Chuck Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, Public Works Director /City Engineer
Steven Love, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Grant Agreement between the Ramsey Washington Metro
Watershed District and the City of Maplewood, July 2011 Storm Response,
City Project 11-19
DATE: July 9, 2013
INTRODUCTION
The City Council will consider approval of two grant agreements with the Ramsey Washington Metro
Watershed District (RWMWD) to receive grant funds for flood remediation work as part of the July 2011
Storm Response, City Project 11-19.
BACKGROUND
On March 25, 2013 the Council approved a budget adjustment for investigation and remediation efforts
of localized flooding issues associated with the July 2011 storm event. As part of the March 25th
Agenda report Area #20, 2482 Adele Street and Area #21, 522 Marnie were identified as recommended
projects for construction in 2013. Plans have been completed for the proposed remediation work for
each of these properties. The following is a summary of the estimated construction costs for each
project:
Area #20 - 2482 Adele Street
o Total Construction Cost = $26,808
Includes 20% Construction Contingency
Does Not Include Engineering and Construction Management
Area #21 – 522 Marnie Street
o Total Construction Cost = $27,628
Includes 20% Construction Contingency
Does Not Include Engineering and Construction Management
DISCUSSION
The City applied for cost-share grants through RWMWD to help offset the construction cost of the
proposed projects. For Area #20 – 2482 Adele Street the RWMWD Board of Managers approved a
100% cost share for construction costs up to $26,808. For Area #21 – 522 Marnie Street the RWMWD
Board of Managers approved a 75% cost share for construction costs up to $20,721. To receive the
funds an agreement (attached) between RWMWD and the City is required for each project. A request
for proposal (RFP) will be sent out to contractors for each of the projects.
BUDGET
The total estimated construction cost for the two proposed flood remediation projects is $54,436. These
costs were planned to be paid for from the July 2011 Storm Response, City Project 11-19, project
budget. On July 3, 2013 the RWMWD Board of Managers approved a not to exceed total of $47,529
Agenda Item G5
Packet Page Number 61 of 275
towards the proposed flood remediation construction costs of Area #20 and Area #21. When the
projects are complete and actual quantities have been tabulated and approved, the City will submit its
requests for reimbursement for the actual cost of the improvements. The remaining project costs will
be paid with funds from the July 2011 Storm Response, City Project 11-19, project budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the
attached agreements with the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District to receive cost-share
grant funds for flood remediation work as part of the July 2011 Storm Response, City Project 11-19.
Attachments:
1. Area 20 – 2482 Adele Street Agreement
2. Area 21 – 522 Marnie Street Agreement
Agenda Item G5
Packet Page Number 62 of 275
July 8, 2013
Steve Love
City of Maplewood
2482 Adele St
Maplewood MN 55109
Paige Ahlborg, Permit Coordinator
2482 Adele St; 13-25 BMP
Dear Mr. Love,
On 7/3/2013 the Board of Managers of the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District
reviewed your application for the above-described project. A motion was duly made, seconded,
and passed to approve this project conditioned upon execution of the cost share agreement. The
project was approved for funding up to $26,808.00 cost share maximum.
Enclosed is a copy of the agreement. The agreement must be signed prior to commencing any
work on the project.
A final financial report and receipts shall be submitted by 7/3/2014 to be eligible for funds.
Please let me know if you have any other questions on your project and call to schedule a site visit
when your project is set to begin. (651) 792-7964
Sincerely,
Paige Ahlborg
To:
From:
Re:
Agenda Item G5
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 63 of 275
THIS AGREEMENT is made the 08 day of July, 2013, by and between the Ramsey-Washington Metro
Watershed District, (hereinafter “District”) and City of Maplewood for 2482 Adele St (hereinafter
"Landowner"). 13-25 BMP
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 The District has included in its annual budget funds to cost-share with approved Landowners to
implement best management practices within the watershed district.
1.2 The District funding is limited to 100% of the cost of materials and labor actually incurred by the
Landowners for the project as approved by the District, up to a maximum contribution of $26,808.00
commercial/governmental Landowner.
1.3 Landowner has applied to the District for funds to help pay for the cost of materials or labor fofor
Raingarden(1) (hereinafter "Project") as described in the BMP Incentive Program Application attached
herein as Exhibit A.
1.4 The District is willing to fund the Project described in Exhibit A in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement.
2. SERVICES
2.1 Ladowner will complete the Project described in Exhibit A in accordance with the terms, scope,
schedule, and budget set forth therein. The Landowners do hereby covenant that they are the owners and
are lawfully seized and possessed of the real estate above-described.
2.2 Landowner shall maintain the Project for a period of twenty (20) years per commerical/government
Landowner from the date of this document. The agreement shall run with the land and extend to and bind
the heirs, representatives, successors and/or assigns of the party hereto respectively.
3. REIMBURSEMENT
3.1 Expenses incurred by Landowner in Exhibit A will be reimbursed by the District up to 100% of the total
cost of materials or labor actually incurred by Landowner up to a maximum amount of $26,808.00 per
commercial/governmental property. Upon incurring the costs identified in Exhibit A, the Landowner shall
provide a list of all reimbursable expenses incurred and receipts or copies of receipts therefore, to the
District.
3.2 The District will reimburse the identified reimbursable expenses in accordance with Section 3.1 within 60
days of receipt of the required financial and performance information and receipts.
3.3 The District will not be liable or responsible for payment for services or reimbursement for expenses
other than those specified as reimbursable expenses in accordance with Section 3.1.
3.4 Following the completion of the project described in Exhibit A, Landowner shall submit a final financial
report to the District listing the final expenses for the activity, along with copies of receipts.
GENERAL TERMS
4.1 This Agreement shall remain in effect unless canceled by mutual agreement or in accordance with
Section 4.2. This Agreement shall expire if the Project is not completed pursuant to the schedule in Exhibit A
and the financial information required by Sections 3.1 and 3.4 is not received within one year after approval.
4.2 If weather or other conditions beyond the control of the Landowner do not permit the completion of this
Project within one year after approval, this Agreement may be amended, by mutual written consent of the
parties, to reschedule the Project and funding.
4.3 Landowner must obtain all permits required in conjunction with the Project, including but not limited to
City and Department of Natural Resources approval, prior to starting the Project.
4.4 Landowner agrees to allow the District access to the Project area for evaluation and promotion of the
Project. The Landowner agrees to make the site available as a demonstration site to the general public at
the reasonable request of the District.
4.5 Landowner will act in all respects as an independent contractor under this Agreement and will be solely
responsible for performance of services required hereunder as well as the means and manner of
performance thereof. The District will not be an employer, partner, or co-venturer with Landowner for any
purpose. Nothing herein authorizes Landowner to act as an agent or representative of the District for any
purpose whatsoever.
4.6 Landowner shall indemnify, defend and hold the District and its agents, employees, officers and
contractors, harmless from all claims made by Landowner and/or third parties for damage or loss sustained
or costs incurred, including but not limited to District staff, engineering and attorneys fees, in connection with
INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT
Agenda Item G5
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 64 of 275
or arising out of the issuance of and/or acceptance and payment by the District of funds pursuant to this
cost-share, construction of the project, or this agreement.
4.7 The District shall have no obligation to the Landowner, specifically, the District shall not need to restore
the land to its original condition upon expiration or termination of this Agreement.
RAMSEY-WASHINGTON METRO
WATERSHED DISTRICT
_________________________________
District Administrator
Date _____________________________
2665 Noel Drive
Little Canada, MN 55117
LANDOWNERS
_____________________________________
Print Name ____________________________
_____________________________________
Print Name ____________________________
_____________________________________
Print Name ____________________________
Date _________________________________
Property Address
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
Agenda Item G5
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 65 of 275
July 8, 2013
Steve Love
City of Maplewood
522 Marnie St
Maplewood MN 55109
Paige Ahlborg, Permit Coordinator
Vista Hills Park; 13-24 BMP
Dear Mr. Love,
On July 3, 2013 the Board of Managers of the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District
reviewed your application for the above-described project. A motion was duly made, seconded,
and passed to approve this project conditioned upon execution of the cost share agreement. The
project was approved for funding up to $20,721.00 cost share maximum.
Enclosed is a copy of the agreement. The agreement must be signed prior to commencing any
work on the project.
A final financial report and receipts shall be submitted by to be eligible for funds.
Please let me know if you have any other questions on your project and call to schedule a site visit
when your project is set to begin. (651) 792-7964
Sincerely,
Paige Ahlborg
To:
From:
Re:
Agenda Item G5
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 66 of 275
THIS AGREEMENT is made the 08 day of July, 2013, by and between the Ramsey-Washington Metro
Watershed District, (hereinafter “District”) and City of Maplewood for Vista Hills Park (hereinafter
"Landowner"). 13-24 BMP
1. BACKGROUND
1.1 The District has included in its annual budget funds to cost-share with approved Landowners to
implement best management practices within the watershed district.
1.2 The District funding is limited to 75% of the cost of materials and labor actually incurred by the
Landowners for the project as approved by the District, up to a maximum contribution of $20,721.00 per
commercial/governmental Landowner.
1.3 Landowner has applied to the District for funds to help pay for the cost of materials or labor fofor
Raingarden(3) (hereinafter "Project") as described in the BMP Incentive Program Application attached
herein as Exhibit A.
1.4 The District is willing to fund the Project described in Exhibit A in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement.
2. SERVICES
2.1 Ladowner will complete the Project described in Exhibit A in accordance with the terms, scope,
schedule, and budget set forth therein. The Landowners do hereby covenant that they are the owners and
are lawfully seized and possessed of the real estate above-described.
2.2 Landowner shall maintain the Project for a period of twenty (20) years per commerical/government
Landowner from the date of this document. The agreement shall run with the land and extend to and bind
the heirs, representatives, successors and/or assigns of the party hereto respectively.
3. REIMBURSEMENT
3.1 Expenses incurred by Landowner in Exhibit A will be reimbursed by the District up to 75% of the total
cost of materials or labor actually incurred by Landowner up to a maximum amount of $20,721.00 per
commercial/governmental property. Upon incurring the costs identified in Exhibit A, the Landowner shall
provide a list of all reimbursable expenses incurred and receipts or copies of receipts therefore, to the
District.
3.2 The District will reimburse the identified reimbursable expenses in accordance with Section 3.1 within 60
days of receipt of the required financial and performance information and receipts.
3.3 The District will not be liable or responsible for payment for services or reimbursement for expenses
other than those specified as reimbursable expenses in accordance with Section 3.1.
3.4 Following the completion of the project described in Exhibit A, Landowner shall submit a final financial
report to the District listing the final expenses for the activity, along with copies of receipts.
GENERAL TERMS
4.1 This Agreement shall remain in effect unless canceled by mutual agreement or in accordance with
Section 4.2. This Agreement shall expire if the Project is not completed pursuant to the schedule in Exhibit A
and the financial information required by Sections 3.1 and 3.4 is not received within one year after approval.
4.2 If weather or other conditions beyond the control of the Landowner do not permit the completion of this
Project within one year after approval, this Agreement may be amended, by mutual written consent of the
parties, to reschedule the Project and funding.
4.3 Landowner must obtain all permits required in conjunction with the Project, including but not limited to
City and Department of Natural Resources approval, prior to starting the Project.
4.4 Landowner agrees to allow the District access to the Project area for evaluation and promotion of the
Project. The Landowner agrees to make the site available as a demonstration site to the general public at
the reasonable request of the District.
4.5 Landowner will act in all respects as an independent contractor under this Agreement and will be solely
responsible for performance of services required hereunder as well as the means and manner of
performance thereof. The District will not be an employer, partner, or co-venturer with Landowner for any
purpose. Nothing herein authorizes Landowner to act as an agent or representative of the District for any
purpose whatsoever.
4.6 Landowner shall indemnify, defend and hold the District and its agents, employees, officers and
contractors, harmless from all claims made by Landowner and/or third parties for damage or loss sustained
or costs incurred, including but not limited to District staff, engineering and attorneys fees, in connection with
INCENTIVE PROGRAM AGREEMENT
Agenda Item G5
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 67 of 275
or arising out of the issuance of and/or acceptance and payment by the District of funds pursuant to this
cost-share, construction of the project, or this agreement.
4.7 The District shall have no obligation to the Landowner, specifically, the District shall not need to restore
the land to its original condition upon expiration or termination of this Agreement.
RAMSEY-WASHINGTON METRO
WATERSHED DISTRICT
_________________________________
District Administrator
Date _____________________________
2665 Noel Drive
Little Canada, MN 55117
LANDOWNERS
_____________________________________
Print Name ____________________________
_____________________________________
Print Name ____________________________
_____________________________________
Print Name ____________________________
Date _________________________________
Property Address
_____________________________________
_____________________________________
Agenda Item G5
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 68 of 275
Agenda Item G6
Attachments
1. CFS requisition Phase 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager, Chuck Ahl
FROM: IT Director, Mychal Fowlds
SUBJECT: Approval of Office Furniture for Investigations Division,
Police Department Expansion Project, Phase 2
DATE: July 16, 2013
Introduction
The City Council approved funding for Phase 2 of the Police Department Expansion Project in the amount
of $650,000 on March 11, 2013. The majority of the construction project was put out for bid and was
awarded to Weber, Inc. on April 29, 2013. Certain items were not part of the bid package. As they arise
staff will present them to Council for approval.
Background
Phase 1 of the Police Department Expansion Project predominately involves moving Community
Development and Parks and Recreation from City Hall to 1902 County Road B East. Phase 2 then
involves moving the Investigations division of the Police Department in to the space vacated by Community
Development. In doing so staff has needs for the items shown below. These items were considered to be
outside the scope of the construction bid but are certainly part of the Police Department Expansion Project.
1. Commercial Furniture Systems (CFS) – Office furniture purchases and installation for Phase 2
utilizing US Communities pricing not to exceed $39,500.
Budget Impact
The item listed above has been planned for and will be funded from the $650,000 that the City Council
previously allocated for the Police Department Expansion Project – Phase 2.
Recommendation
It is recommended that approval be given to proceed with the Police Department Expansion Project item
listed above.
Action Required
Submit to City Council for review and approval.
Packet Page Number 69 of 275
Mail Purchase Order?Yes No
Fax Purchase Order?Yes No Requested by:
Fax #
(If needed)Signed Date
Purchase Order No.
(Assigned by Finance Dept.)City Mgr. or his/her designee Approval:
FUND ACTIVTY ACCOUNT Signed Date
Approved by City Council:Date
Finance Department Approval:
TOTAL Signed Date
FOR ACCOUNTING USE ONLY:
S:\FINANCE\Forms\AP-Requisition
Names of Bidders
If low bidder is not recommended or only a single bid has been obtained, include a full explanation of reasons.
Freight
Subtotal
Quantity Description Unit
Price
$
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
4301 Highway 7
Commercial Furniture Services
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
$
1 See attached quote
CFS is a member of US Communities. US Communities is an approved collective purchasing option per our City
Check one
City of Maplewood
Amount
$
Unit
Price Amount
39,257.52$
36,732.18 36,732.18
2,525.34$
purchasing guide. Therefore staff is required to provide only one quote.
36,732.18$
Deliver to
PROGRAM
Name and address of recommended bidder
VENDOR NUMBER
Sales Tax @ .06875
Total
AMOUNT
REQUISITION
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
(This is NOT a Purchase Order)
Packet Page Number 70 of 275
Packet Page Number 71 of 275
Packet Page Number 72 of 275
Packet Page Number 73 of 275
Packet Page Number 74 of 275
Packet Page Number 75 of 275
Packet Page Number 76 of 275
Packet Page Number 77 of 275
Packet Page Number 78 of 275
Packet Page Number 79 of 275
Packet Page Number 80 of 275
Packet Page Number 81 of 275
Packet Page Number 82 of 275
Packet Page Number 83 of 275
Packet Page Number 84 of 275
Packet Page Number 85 of 275
Packet Page Number 86 of 275
Packet Page Number 87 of 275
Agenda Item H1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Charles Ahl, City Manager
Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 7:00 pm: Public Hearing to Modify Development Program and
Establish TIF District No. 1-12 for Research and Development Facility
on 3M Campus
a. Public Hearing called for after 7:00 pm
a. Planning Commission and HEDC Recommendations
b. Resolution Approving the Modification to the Development
Program for Development District No. 1 and Establishing Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1-12 and approving a Tax
Increment Financing Plan
c. Resolution Approving Tax Increment Financing Development
Agreement with 3M Companies
d. Resolution Approving an Inter-fund Loan Agreement
DATE: July 15, 2013
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
The 3M Company is proposing to construct a 400,000-square foot Research and Development
Laboratory on their campus in Maplewood. The estimated cost for the R&D Facility provided by
3M is estimated at $156 million and is proposed to be constructed over the next 2 years. The
proposed facility is expected to house over 700 employees. It has been testified by 3M Officials
that those 700 employees, plus support personnel, will remain on the Maplewood campus,
rather than be re-located to others states or elsewhere in the 3M international properties. This
job retention, plus the potential for continued upgrades and expansion on the Maplewood
campus are the basis for considering tax increment financing support for this project. This
testimony from 3M indicates that “but-for” this financial support, 3M will not be constructing this
facility. Approval of the district is based upon that premise.
3M has requested Tax Increment Financing for the purpose of reinvestment in their campus and
retention of these research positions in Maplewood/Minnesota. In addition, with this investment,
3M is agreeing to additional upgrades to other facilities on their campus of at least $50 million
prior to December 2021. The original plan was for the tax increment plan to use a portion of the
increased taxes from the new R&D Facility to support the bond payments for a new Maplewood
Fire Station to be constructed on the property immediately to the north of this new R&D
Laboratory. That part of the legislation was not approved by the legislature; however, provisions
in the current Development Agreement allow the City to capture up to 20% of future revenue to
fund City initiated TIF eligible expenditures within the 3M campus and adjacent right of way. The
expenditures funded by the 20% City capture include site work and utility expenditures of
approximately $1,250,000 related to the development of the property to be donated by 3M that
eventually will be used to construct the Fire Station.
Packet Page Number 88 of 275
3M TIF PLAN PUBLIC HEARING
PAGE TWO
3M TIF Plan Agreement
Earlier this spring, the Council met to review the various issues with the TIF plan negotiations.
The staff and 3M staff have reached agreement that is favorable to the City. The 3M position is
that they need to upgrade their facilities to retain and attract the scientists and technical
employees that will serve the company for the next 15-20 years. They have indicated that many
of their current staff are nearing retirement and as they compete for the “brightest and best”, they
want their Maplewood campus to reflect an attractive and state of the art facility and campus.
The TIF will help make that a possibility. Attached is a draft TIF Plan and TIF Development
Agreement with 3M prepared by Mary Ippel from Briggs and Morgan, and Tom Denaway from
Springsted Incorporated, which summarizes the values to be considered for capture in the
district. Following are a list of the items finalized within these agreements:
1. Number of years for the District varies from current law at 9 years to up to 26 years if new
legislation is adopted.
a. Agreement: a 26-year term is necessary to capture the full impacts of the parcel
and provide the needed funding.
2. Impact of fiscal disparities to be collected from within the district or outside the district.
a. Agreement: a resolution of funding for the fire station was critical to identifying an
answer to this critical question, and because the legislature has denied our
request, it was a difficult discussion for the City. Finance Director Bauman
estimates that adding the fiscal disparities contribution from outside the district,
as agreed with 3M, may have a potential impact on the tax rate equivalent to a
levy increase of approximately $85,000 per year in future years, probably
beginning in 2016 or 2017. Given that 3M has agreed to donate land valued at
$825,000, as well as pay all fees, agreement to provide the fiscal disparities from
outside the district is a reasonable expense to incur.
3. Private costs for 3M versus City costs
a. 3M has agreed to 80% of the increment generated on a pay-as-you-go [no
bonding] basis, after originally requesting a 90% level.
b. This provides Maplewood with 20% of the increment to be TIF eligible expenses,
including site development costs of approximately $1.250 million for the property
to be used for the fire station site
4. Collection of full City fees.
a. 3M originally requested waiver of fees on this project, but has agreed to pay all
reasonable City fees for the project, including $285,000 for Park Availability
charge.
b. The total fees could approach $1.0 million for building review and utility permit
fees. Collection of these fees will be used to partially finance the fire station.
Commission Review
Both the Planning Commission on July 16, 2013 and the Housing and Economic Development
Commission on June 12, 2013 recommended approval of this TIF Plan. Representatives from
each Commission will be present to provide the Council with their recommendations.
Packet Page Number 89 of 275
3M TIF PLAN PUBLIC HEARING
PAGE THREE
Inter-fund Loan Agreement
It is proposed that the attached resolution be approved to allow automatic interfund loans for a
proposed tax increment district within Development District No. 1 and to provide the terms and
conditions for repayment. Development District No. 1 would encompass any potential 3M
financing.
DISCUSSION
State law requires that interfund loans be approved in advance along with the terms and
conditions for repayment. It is city policy to automatically make interfund loans when a fund has
a temporary cash deficit. These resolutions are a requirement by state law for TIF Districts.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
This will allow for the reimbursement of costs financed from City funds prior to the collection of
tax increments.
Recommended Action
It is recommended that the City Council adopt three separate attached resolutions as follows:
a. Resolution Approving the Modification to the Development Program for Development
District No. 1 and Establishing Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 and approving
a Tax Increment Financing Plan
b. Resolution Approving Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement with 3M
Companies
c. Resolution Approving an Inter-fund Loan Agreement
Attachments:
1. Resolutions (3)
2. Springsted Memo on TIF Plan
3. Draft Tax Increment Financing Plan
4. Draft TIF Development Agreement with 3M Companies
Packet Page Number 90 of 275
5550642v1
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: July 22, 2013
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City
Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly called and held on the
22nd day of July, 2013, at 7:00 p.m.
The following members of the Council were present:
and the following were absent:
Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-12 THEREIN AND APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
WHEREAS:
A. It has been proposed that the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City")
modify the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Development District")
and establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 ("TIF District No. 1-12") therein and
approve and accept the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor all pursuant to and in
accordance with Minnesota Laws, 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21 (the "Special Law"),
and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, both inclusive, as amended and
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, both inclusive, as amended (the "Act");
and
B. Under the Special Law the City has the authority to establish tax
increment financing districts within the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of
Parcel 362922240002 (the "Project Area"); and
C. The Development District and TIF District No. 1-12 are within the Project
Area.
D. It has been proposed by the 3M Company to construct a 400,000 square
foot research and development facility within TIF District No. 1-12 (the "Project"); and
E. The City Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared
a modification to the Development Program for the Development District (the "Development
Program Modification"), and has caused to be prepared a proposed tax increment financing plan
for TIF District No. 1-12 (the "TIF Plan"); and
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 91 of 275
5550642v1
2
F. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior
to the approval of the Development Program Modification and TIF Plan, including, but not
limited to, notification of Ramsey County and School District No. 622 having taxing jurisdiction
over the property to be included in TIF District No. 1-12 and the holding of a public hearing
upon published and mailed notice as required by law; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood as follows:
1. Development Program Modification. The Development Program Modification,
for the Development District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Manager, is
adopted as the development program for the Development District.
2. TIF Plan. The TIF Plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for TIF
District No. 1-12, and the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) As provided by the Special Law, the requirements for qualifying TIF
District No. 1-12 as a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
Subdivision 10, do not apply.
(b) In addition, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.176, Subdivision
4c(d), the City finds that the Project will retain jobs in the state and that the construction of the
Project would not have commenced without the tax increment financing assistance to be
provided pursuant to the TIF Plan.
(c) The proposed development in the opinion of the City Council, would not
occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. The reasons
supporting this finding are that:
(i) Private investment will not finance these development activities due to the
high cost of site improvements and infrastructure costs. The City, without
tax increment assistance, would not have the resources to undertake the
necessary site improvements. It is necessary to finance these development
activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other
development by private enterprise will occur within the Development
District.
(ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without
establishment of TIF District No. 1-12 and the use of tax increments has
been performed as described above. Such analysis is found in Exhibit VI
of the TIF Plan, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value
of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the
estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of TIF District
No. 1-12 and the use of tax increments.
(d) In the opinion of the City Council, the increased market value of the site
that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be
less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 92 of 275
5550642v1
3
after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of
TIF District No. 1-12 permitted by the TIF Plan. The reasons supporting this finding are that:
(i) The estimated amount by which the market value of the site will increase
without the use of tax increment financing is $0, plus a small amount
attributable to appreciation in land value;
(ii) The estimated increase in the market value that will result from the
development to be assisted with tax increment financing is $24,720,000;
and
(iii) The present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum
duration of the district permitted by the tax increment financing plan is
$11,794,711.
(e) The TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-12 conforms to the general plan for
development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons for
supporting this finding are that:
(i) TIF District No. 1-12 is properly zoned; and
(ii) The Planning Commission of the City has determined that the proposed
TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development and
redevelopment of the City as a whole ; and
(iii) The TIF Plan will generally compliment and serve to implement policies
adopted by the City.
(f) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Project
Area by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that:
The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment
by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area.
3. Public Purpose. The adoption of the Development Program Modification and TIF
Plan conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to
redevelop an area of the State which is already built up to provide employment opportunities and
to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a
public purpose.
4. Certification. The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original
net tax capacity of TIF District No. 1-12 as described in TIF Plan, and to certify in each year
thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased in
accordance with the Act; and the City Manager is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit
this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together
with a list of all properties within TIF District No. 1-12 for which building permits have been
issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 93 of 275
5550642v1
4
5. Filing. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the
Development Program Modification and TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-12 with the
Commissioner of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member _________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 94 of 275
5550642v1
5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RAMSEY COUNTY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Manager of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a
full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City,
duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the
modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1 and the establishment
of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 therein in the City.
WITNESS my hand this 22nd day of July, 2013.
________________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 95 of 275
5563959v1
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: July 22, 2013
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in said City
on Monday, the 22nd day of July, 2013, at 7:00 o'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member ____________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
A. WHEREAS, 3M Company (the "Developer") has requested the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") to assist with the financing of certain costs incurred in
connection with the construction of a 400,000 square foot research and development facility in
the City by the Developer (the "Project").
B. WHEREAS, the Developer and the City have determined to enter into a Tax
Increment Financing Development Agreement providing for the City's tax increment financing
assistance for the Project (the "Development Agreement").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement in substantially
the form submitted, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City.
2. The approval hereby given to the Development Agreement includes approval of
such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications
thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and
approved by the City officials authorized by this resolution to execute the Development
Agreement. The execution of the Development Agreement by the appropriate officer or officers
of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of the Development Agreement in
accordance with the terms hereof.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 96 of 275
5563959v1
2
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
_________________ and, after full discussion thereof, and upon a vote being taken thereof, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Adopted this 22nd day of July, 2013.
_________________________
Mayor
Attest: ________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 97 of 275
5563959v1
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Manager of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached
and foregoing extract of minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of
the City held on the date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a Resolution
Authorizing Execution of a Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement.
WITNESS my hand as such Manager of the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota this _____ day of July, 2013.
_____________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 98 of 275
4983374v1
RESOLUTION NO. ____
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TERMS OF UP TO A
$4,918,342 INTERFUND LOAN IN CONNECTION WITH
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-12
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Background.
(a) The City proposes to establish a Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 (the
"TIF District") within Development District No. 1, and proposes to adopt a tax increment
financing plan for the TIF District (the "TIF Plan").
(b) The City has determined to pay for certain costs identified in the TIF Plan
consisting of land/building acquisition, public utilities, site improvements/preparation, other
eligible improvements, and administrative costs (the "Qualified Costs") incurred in connection
with the establishment of the TIF District and development/redevelopment of land within the TIF
District, which costs will be financed on a temporary basis from City funds available for such
purposes.
(c) Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 7, the City is authorized to
advance or loan money from the City's general fund or any other fund from which such advances
may be legally made, in order to finance the Qualified Costs.
(d) The City intends to reimburse itself for the payment of the Qualified Costs, plus
interest thereon, from tax increments derived from the TIF District in accordance with the terms
of this resolution (which terms are referred to collectively as the "Interfund Loan").
Section 2. Terms of Interfund Loan.
(a) The City hereby authorizes the advance of up to $4,918,342 from the City's
General Fund or so much thereof as may be paid as Qualified Costs. The City shall reimburse
itself for such advances together with interest at the rate stated below. Interest accrues on the
principal amount from the date of each advance. The maximum rate of interest permitted to be
charged is limited to the greater of the rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 270C.40
or Section 549.09 as of the date the loan or advance is authorized, unless the written agreement
states that the maximum interest rate will fluctuate as the interest rates specified under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 270C.40 or Section 549.09 are from time to time adjusted. The interest rate
shall be 4% and will not fluctuate.
(b) Principal and interest on the Interfund Loan shall be paid semi-annually on each
February 1 and August 1 (each a "Payment Date") commencing with the Payment Date on which
the City has Available Tax Increment (defined below), or on any other dates determined by the
City Manager, through the last receipt of tax increment from the TIF District.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 99 of 275
4983374v1
2
(c) Payments on the Interfund Loan are payable solely from "Available Tax
Increments" which shall mean, on each Payment Date, all of the tax increment available after
other obligations have been paid, generated in the preceding six (6) months with respect to the
property within the TIF District and remitted to the City by Ramsey County, all in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1799. Payments on the Interfund Loan are
subordinate to any outstanding or future bonds, notes or contracts secured in whole or in part
with Available Tax Increment, and are on parity with any other outstanding or future interfund
loans secured in whole or in part with Available Tax Increment.
(d) The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under the Interfund Loan are
pre-payable in whole or in part at any time by the City without premium or penalty. No partial
prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to
be made under this Interfund Loan.
(e) The Interfund Loan is evidence of an internal borrowing by the City in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 7, and is a limited obligation
payable solely from Available Tax Increment pledged to the payment hereof under this
resolution. The Interfund Loan and the interest hereon shall not be deemed to constitute a
general obligation of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof, including,
without limitation, the City. Neither the State of Minnesota, nor any political subdivision thereof
shall be obligated to pay the principal of or interest on the Interfund Loan or other costs incident
hereto except out of Available Tax Increment, and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing
power of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of
the principal of or interest on the Interfund Loan or other costs incident hereto. The City shall
have no obligation to pay any principal amount of the Interfund Loan or accrued interest thereon,
which may remain unpaid after the final Payment Date.
(f) The City may amend the terms of the Interfund Loan at any time by resolution of
the City Council, including a determination to forgive the outstanding principal amount and
accrued interest to the extent permissible under law.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon the date of its approval.
Adopted this 22nd day of July, 2013.
__________________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
City M anager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 100 of 275
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Terri Heaton, Vice-President
Tom Denaway, Analyst
DATE: July 17, 2013
SUBJECT: Overview of Proposed 3M TIF District
Introduction
The City and 3M have been working on the adoption of special legislation granting the City the authority to create a
3M Renovation and Retention Project Area. The special legislation was recently adopted by the Legislature and
signed into law by the Governor. Now that the special legislation has been adopted the City and 3M have begun the
process of creating a TIF District to assist with the development of the company’s new Research and Development
(R&D) facility. A TIF plan for the new District is currently being drafted, along with a draft development agreement.
The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the special legislation, detail the terms of the current R&D TIF District,
and outline the revenue projections for the District.
Special Legislation
The City and 3M worked together to receive special legislation from the State to create one or more TIF Districts
within the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area. The boundaries of the Project Area are the current 3M
campus parcel and adjoining right of way. TIF Districts created within this project area will be 25-year redevelopment
TIF Districts, which will be exempt from the standard blight finding as provided by the legislation. The legislation
provides the authority to create one or more TIF Districts within the project area until December 31, 2018.
The legislation requires that 100% of the tax increment generated by the new TIF Districts be spent within the
boundaries of the Project Area. As a result of the legislation not requiring a finding of blight, the legislation exempts
the Districts from the requirement that 90% of TIF revenues be used for the remediation of costs leading to the
finding of blight. Additionally, the legislation granted an extension of the 5-year rule to a period of 10-years, allowing
the City to enter into new obligations within the TIF Districts for a period of 10-years following certification of the
Districts.
Springsted Incorporated
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2887
Tel: 651-223-3000
Fax: 651-223-3002
www.springsted.com
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 101 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 2
The current 3M campus, and the corresponding Project Area, consists of a single parcel number 362922240002. In
order to avoid freezing the entire 3M campus as the base value of a TIF District, any new TIF District generated
within the project area will consist of new parcels subdivided from the current single campus parcel. This will allow
the main 3M campus to remain outside of a TIF District and for its value to fluctuate based on current market
conditions.
TIF District 1-12 3M Research and Development Project – Development Agreement Terms
Now that the special legislation has been approved by the Legislature, the City is in the process of creating TIF
District 1-12 to assist 3M with the development of the new R&D Lab Facility. A proposed TIF Plan and Development
Agreement have been prepared and are enclosed for Council review. Outlined below are the points on which the
Development Agreement has been negotiated regards to the terms of the proposed TIF District 1-12:
Capture of TIF Revenue from Fiscal Disparity: When a TIF District is created an election can be made by the City to
capture the incremental value growth generated by the Fiscal Disparity portion of the tax capacity of a parcel. The
City can elect to capture this portion of tax capacity as TIF, and make the contribution to the Fiscal Disparity pool
from outside of the TIF District. The election to make the contribution from outside of the TIF District results in
greater TIF revenue, and potentially has a modest impact on the general taxable market value on which the general
fund levy is spread. Conversely, the City may elect to make the contribution from inside of the TIF District, which
results in lower TIF revenue with no potential impact on the levy. During the life of a TIF District the City has the
ability to change the election one time, and only in circumstances where the election is going from outside of the
District to inside the District.
The proposed Development Agreement allows for the contribution to be made outside of the District, on the
contingency that 3M continue to invest in its campus. If by December 31, 2021, the company has not obtained one
or more building permits with a total minimum cost of not less than $50,000,000 (not including the R&D Building and
routine maintenance), the City will change the fiscal disparity election to be made from within the TIF District. This
term in the draft Agreement ties the generation of additional TIF revenue from the Fiscal Disparity portion to
additional investment in the campus by the company.
City Pooling Percentage: The proposed Agreement allows for the City to capture 20% of the tax increment generated
for either eligible expenditures within the project area, or administrative purposes. The City intends to use a portion
of this revenue to fund approximately $1.0M of City initiated TIF eligible site work and infrastructure improvements on
property located within the Project Area. Additional TIF eligible improvements may be funded in the future from
captured TIF funds as they are available. The net present value of the future revenue stream is $2,379,619.
Pay-As-You-Go Note: The draft Agreement contemplates the City entering issuing a pay-as-you-go note to the
company in a principal amount of $9,568,000. The note will be repaid over the life of the District at an annual non-
compounding interest rate of 5%; the note will be repaid solely by 80% of the Tax Increment generated by the
District. The principal amount of the note is based on the TIF revenue projections outlined below.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 102 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 3
Development Fees: While not detailed in the proposed Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement, the City
has also negotiated with the company that all building and planning permit fees will be paid for the facility, including a
park dedication fee of $285,000.
TIF District 1-12 Development Assumptions
The assumptions outlined below were used in the creation of the TIF revenue projections for the proposed TIF
District 1-12. The revenue assumptions are based on development terms outlined above and base assumptions
regarding timing and value provided by the company.
R&D Building Build-Out:
Value Constructed 2013: $6,000,000
Value Constructed 2014: $6,000,000
Value Constructed 2015: $12,720,000
Total Value Constructed: $24,720,000
Inflation: These revenue projections are a based on a 2% inflation assumption.
Base Value: The proposed R&D facility is to be developed on a parcel that is currently undefined, as it is in the
process of being subdivided out of the single campus parcel. As a result the base value of the R&D parcel is
unknown, and therefore the revenue projections are based on the market value generated by the R&D building only
and the revenue projections are not assuming a base frozen value. The increment is projected based only on the
capture of the increased market value resulting from the proposed vertical construction. For estimation purposes we
have assumed a pro-rata share of the existing campus market value will be applied to the newly created parcel. The
base value of the parcel is estimated at $8,155,288.
Fiscal Disparity Sharing Factor: Fiscal Disparity Contribution will be made from outside of the TIF District, resulting in
greater TIF revenue.
TIF Eligible Tax Rate Pay 2013:
City: 48.659%
County: 65.240%
School District: 32.552%
Miscellaneous: 11.520%
Total Tax Rate: 157.972%
City Admin and Pooling Percentage: - We have assumed a total City retainage of 20% for pooling and administrative
purposes.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 103 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 4
TIF 1-12 Pay-As-You-Go Note Amount and City Funding Capacity
We have estimated the maximum funding capacity of the City retaining 20% of the increment for the full 26-year term
of the TIF district based on a net present value interest rate of 5%.
Additionally, we have calculated a pay-as-you-go note report illustrating the potential principal amount and repayment
schedule of a pay-go note to 3M. This note is based on 80% of the annual increment being available during the 26-
year term of the District; with first receipt projected for Pay2015 and final receipt projected for Pay2040. The interest
on the note is to be accrued at a non-compounding annual rate of 5%.
.
Scenario 26-Year Term
Projected Built-Out: R&D Building Only
Fiscal Disparity Contrib. From Outside District
Percentage of Revenues available for City 20%
Gross revenue of City Retainage $4,918,342
NPV of City Retainage
(5% Interest) $2,379,619
3M Percentage 80%
Gross revenue of 3M retainage $19,673,354
Pay-Go Principal Amount (5% Interest Rate) $9,568,000
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 104 of 275
City of Maplewood July 17, 2013 Page 5 City of Maplewood, MinnesotaTax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12Proposed 3M Redevelopment ProjectR&D Facility Less: Less: Retained Times:Less:TotalAnnualAnnual Incremental Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Subtotal City PoolingNetPeriod Market Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Net Tax RetainageRevenueEnding Value Capacity Capacity 0.0000% Capacity Rate Increment 0.360% Increment20.00% 80%(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14)12/31/15 6,000,000 283,106 163,106 0 120,000 157.971% 189,565 682 188,883 37,777151,10612/31/16 12,120,000 405,506 163,106 0 242,400 157.971% 382,922 1,379 381,543 76,309305,23412/31/17 25,082,400 664,754 163,106 0 501,648 157.971% 792,458 2,853 789,605 157,921631,68412/31/18 25,584,048 674,787 163,106 0 511,681 157.971% 808,308 2,910 805,398 161,080644,31812/31/19 26,095,729 685,020 163,106 0 521,915 157.971% 824,474 2,968 821,506 164,301657,20512/31/20 26,617,644 695,459 163,106 0 532,353 157.971% 840,963 3,027 837,936 167,587670,34912/31/21 27,149,996 706,106 163,106 0 543,000 157.971% 857,782 3,088 854,694 170,939683,75512/31/22 27,692,996 716,966 163,106 0 553,860 157.971% 874,938 3,150 871,788 174,358697,43012/31/23 28,246,856 728,043 163,106 0 564,937 157.971% 892,437 3,213 889,224 177,845711,37912/31/24 28,811,793 739,342 163,106 0 576,236 157.971% 910,286 3,277 907,009 181,402725,60712/31/25 29,388,029 750,866 163,106 0 587,761 157.971% 928,491 3,343 925,148 185,030740,11812/31/26 29,975,790 762,622 163,106 0 599,516 157.971% 947,061 3,409 943,652 188,730754,92212/31/27 30,575,306 774,612 163,106 0 611,506 157.971% 966,002 3,478 962,524 192,505770,01912/31/28 31,186,812 786,842 163,106 0 623,736 157.971% 985,322 3,547 981,775 196,355785,42012/31/29 31,810,548 799,317 163,106 0 636,211 157.971% 1,005,029 3,618 1,001,411 200,282801,12912/31/30 32,446,759 812,041 163,106 0 648,935 157.971% 1,025,129 3,690 1,021,439 204,288817,15112/31/31 33,095,694 825,020 163,106 0 661,914 157.971% 1,045,632 3,764 1,041,868 208,374833,49412/31/32 33,757,608 838,258 163,106 0 675,152 157.971% 1,066,545 3,840 1,062,705 212,541850,16412/31/33 34,432,760 851,761 163,106 0 688,655 157.971% 1,087,876 3,916 1,083,960 216,792867,16812/31/34 35,121,415 865,534 163,106 0 702,428 157.971% 1,109,633 3,995 1,105,638 221,128884,51012/31/35 35,823,844 879,583 163,106 0 716,477 157.971% 1,131,826 4,075 1,127,751 225,550902,20112/31/36 36,540,321 893,912 163,106 0 730,806 157.971% 1,154,462 4,156 1,150,306 230,061920,24512/31/37 37,271,127 908,528 163,106 0 745,423 157.971% 1,177,551 4,239 1,173,312 234,662938,65012/31/38 38,016,550 923,437 163,106 0 760,331 157.971% 1,201,102 4,324 1,196,778 239,356957,42212/31/39 38,776,880 938,643 163,106 0 775,538 157.971% 1,225,125 4,410 1,220,715 244,143976,57212/31/40 39,552,418 954,154 163,106 0 791,048 157.971% 1,249,627 4,499 1,245,128 249,026996,102$24,680,546 $88,850 $24,591,696 $4,918,342$19,673,354NPV: $2,379,619Agenda Item H1 Attachment 2Packet Page Number 105 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 6
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Only - Full Term - FD Outside - 80% Captured
Note Date:06/30/13
Note Rate:5.00%
Amount:$9,568,000
Cumulative Unpaid Semi-Annual Loan
Interest Accrued Net Balance
Date Principal Interest P & I Due Interest Revenue Outstanding
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
9,568,000.00
08/01/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,195.56 41,195.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 280,395.56 280,395.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 519,595.56 519,595.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/15 0.00 0.00 0.00 758,795.56 758,795.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/15 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 997,995.56 922,442.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/16 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 1,161,642.56 1,086,089.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/16 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,325,289.56 1,172,672.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/17 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,411,872.56 1,259,255.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/17 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,498,455.56 1,182,613.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/18 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,421,813.56 1,105,971.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/18 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,345,171.56 1,023,012.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/19 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,262,212.56 940,053.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/19 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,179,253.56 850,651.06 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/20 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,089,851.06 761,248.56 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/20 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 1,000,448.56 665,274.06 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/21 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 904,474.06 569,299.56 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/21 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 808,499.56 466,622.06 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/22 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 705,822.06 363,944.56 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/22 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 603,144.56 254,429.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/23 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 493,629.56 144,914.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/23 0.00 355,689.50 355,689.50 384,114.56 28,425.06 355,689.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/24 88,064.44 267,625.06 355,689.50 267,625.06 0.00 355,689.50 9,479,935.56
08/01/24 125,805.11 236,998.39 362,803.50 236,998.39 0.00 362,803.50 9,354,130.45
02/01/25 128,950.24 233,853.26 362,803.50 233,853.26 0.00 362,803.50 9,225,180.21
08/01/25 139,429.49 230,629.51 370,059.00 230,629.51 0.00 370,059.00 9,085,750.72
02/01/26 142,915.23 227,143.77 370,059.00 227,143.77 0.00 370,059.00 8,942,835.49
08/01/26 153,890.11 223,570.89 377,461.00 223,570.89 0.00 377,461.00 8,788,945.38
02/01/27 157,737.37 219,723.63 377,461.00 219,723.63 0.00 377,461.00 8,631,208.01
08/01/27 169,229.30 215,780.20 385,009.50 215,780.20 0.00 385,009.50 8,461,978.71
02/01/28 173,460.03 211,549.47 385,009.50 211,549.47 0.00 385,009.50 8,288,518.68
08/01/28 185,497.03 207,212.97 392,710.00 207,212.97 0.00 392,710.00 8,103,021.65
02/01/29 190,134.46 202,575.54 392,710.00 202,575.54 0.00 392,710.00 7,912,887.19
08/01/29 202,742.32 197,822.18 400,564.50 197,822.18 0.00 400,564.50 7,710,144.87
02/01/30 207,810.88 192,753.62 400,564.50 192,753.62 0.00 400,564.50 7,502,333.99
08/01/30 221,017.15 187,558.35 408,575.50 187,558.35 0.00 408,575.50 7,281,316.84
02/01/31 226,542.58 182,032.92 408,575.50 182,032.92 0.00 408,575.50 7,054,774.26
08/01/31 240,377.64 176,369.36 416,747.00 176,369.36 0.00 416,747.00 6,814,396.62
02/01/32 246,387.08 170,359.92 416,747.00 170,359.92 0.00 416,747.00 6,568,009.54
08/01/32 260,881.76 164,200.24 425,082.00 164,200.24 0.00 425,082.00 6,307,127.78
02/01/33 267,403.81 157,678.19 425,082.00 157,678.19 0.00 425,082.00 6,039,723.97
08/01/33 282,590.90 150,993.10 433,584.00 150,993.10 0.00 433,584.00 5,757,133.07
02/01/34 289,655.67 143,928.33 433,584.00 143,928.33 0.00 433,584.00 5,467,477.40
08/01/34 305,568.06 136,686.94 442,255.00 136,686.94 0.00 442,255.00 5,161,909.34
02/01/35 313,207.27 129,047.73 442,255.00 129,047.73 0.00 442,255.00 4,848,702.07
08/01/35 329,882.95 121,217.55 451,100.50 121,217.55 0.00 451,100.50 4,518,819.12
02/01/36 338,130.02 112,970.48 451,100.50 112,970.48 0.00 451,100.50 4,180,689.10
08/01/36 355,605.27 104,517.23 460,122.50 104,517.23 0.00 460,122.50 3,825,083.83
02/01/37 364,495.40 95,627.10 460,122.50 95,627.10 0.00 460,122.50 3,460,588.43
08/01/37 382,810.29 86,514.71 469,325.00 86,514.71 0.00 469,325.00 3,077,778.14
02/01/38 392,380.55 76,944.45 469,325.00 76,944.45 0.00 469,325.00 2,685,397.59
08/01/38 411,576.06 67,134.94 478,711.00 67,134.94 0.00 478,711.00 2,273,821.53
02/01/39 421,865.46 56,845.54 478,711.00 56,845.54 0.00 478,711.00 1,851,956.07
08/01/39 441,987.10 46,298.90 488,286.00 46,298.90 0.00 488,286.00 1,409,968.97
02/01/40 453,036.78 35,249.22 488,286.00 35,249.22 0.00 488,286.00 956,932.19
08/01/40 474,127.70 23,923.30 498,051.00 23,923.30 0.00 498,051.00 482,804.49
02/01/41 482,804.49 12,070.11 494,874.60 12,070.11 0.00 494,874.60 0.00
$9,568,000 $10,102,177.60 $19,670,177.60 $24,499,080.36 $14,396,902.76 $19,670,177.60
Surplus Tax Increment 3,176.40
Total Net Revenue $19,673,354.00
Projected Pay-As-You-Go Note Report
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 106 of 275
Maplewood, Minnesota
Draft Tax Increment Financing Plan
for
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment)
District No. 1-12
Within Development District No. 1
(3M Research and Development Project)
Dated: July 16, 2013
Prepared by:
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2887
(651) 223-3000
WWW.SPRINGSTED.COM
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 107 of 275
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page(s)
A. Definitions .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
B. Statutory Authorization .......................................................................................................................................... 1
C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose ................................................................................................................ 1
D. Statement of Objectives ........................................................................................................................................ 1
E. 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area .......................................................................................................... 1
F. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District ..................................................... 2
G. Duration of the TIF District .................................................................................................................................... 2
H. Property to be Included in the TIF District ............................................................................................................. 2
I. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District ............................................................................................................ 2
J. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District .......................................................................... 3
K. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing .................................................................................................. 3
L. Estimated Public Costs ......................................................................................................................................... 4
M. Estimated Sources of Revenue ............................................................................................................................. 5
N. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness ......................................................................................................... 5
O. Original Net Tax Capacity ..................................................................................................................................... 5
P. Original Local Tax Rate ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Q. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment .................................................... 6
R. Use of Tax Increment ............................................................................................................................................ 7
S. Excess Tax Increment ........................................................................................................................................... 7
T. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule ..................................................................................................... 8
U. Limitation on Administrative Expenses.................................................................................................................. 8
V. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule ................................................................ 9
W. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ................................................................................................... 9
X. Prior Planned Improvements ............................................................................................................................... 10
Y. Development Agreements ................................................................................................................................... 10
Z. Assessment Agreements .................................................................................................................................... 10
AA. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan............................................................................................. 10
AB. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan ........................................................................................... 11
AC. Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements.................................................................... 11
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District within Development District No. 1..................................... EXHIBIT I
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District within 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area .......... EXHIBIT II
Assumptions Report .............................................................................................................................. EXHIBIT III
Projected Tax Increment Report ...........................................................................................................EXHIBIT IV
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report ........................................................................EXHIBIT V
Market Value Analysis Report ...............................................................................................................EXHIBIT VI
Pay-As-You-Go Note Report ................................................................................................................EXHIBIT VII
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 108 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 1
Section A Definitions
The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used
indicates a different meaning:
"City" means the City of Maplewood, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality".
"City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as the ‘Governing Body”.
"County" means Ramsey County, Minnesota.
"Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the corresponding
Development Program.
"Development District Area" means the geographic area of the Development District.
"Development Program" means the Development Program for the Development District.
“Project Area” means the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of parcel 36.29.22.24.0002.
"School District" means Independent School District No. 622, Minnesota.
“Special Law” means Minnesota Laws, 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, both inclusive.
"TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12.
"TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document).
Section B Statutory Authorization
See Section 1.3 of the Development Program for the Development District.
Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose
See Section 1.4 of the Development Program for the Development District.
Section D Statement of Objectives
See Section 1.5 of the Development Program for the Development District.
Section E 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area
Under the Special Law the City of Maplewood may create one or more tax increment districts within the Project
Area.
With the adoption of this TIF District, the City elects to create a new tax increment district on a newly platted parcel
comprising a portion of the Project Area.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 109 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 2
Section F Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a
Redevelopment District
As provided by the Special Law the requirements for qualifying redevelopment tax increment districts under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, do not apply to the parcel, which is deemed eligible for
inclusion in a redevelopment tax increment district.
The proposed TIF District is eligible as a redevelopment district by virtue of being located on a newly platte d parcel
within the boundaries of the Project Area as defined in Section E.
Under the Special Law the 90 percent rule under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 4j, does not
apply to the Project Area.
Section G Duration of the TIF District
Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. The
City anticipates that the TIF District will remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law (projected to be
though the year 2040). Modification of this plan (see Section AA) shall not extend these limitations. All tax
increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the City. Pursuant to MN
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1(b), the City elects to delay receipt of first increment until 2015.
Section H Property to be Included in the TIF District
The TIF District is an approximate 28.54-acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the
location of the TIF District within the Project Area is shown in Exhibit II. The boundaries and area encompassed by
the TIF District are described below:
Parcel Number Legal Description
36.29.22.24.0002* **The west 650.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the
north 985.00 feet of the east 395.00 feet of the west 1045.00 feet of the Southwest
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter all in Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22
West, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent
to the property described above.
*The parcel to be located in the TIF District is being replatted. The Parcel Number is representative of the parcel
prior to the replatting.
**The legal description provided for the TIF District is representative of the TIF District parcel following the replatting
of the property.
Section I Property to be Acquired in the TIF District
The City may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the City does not
anticipate acquiring any such property at this time.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 110 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 3
Section J Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District
The proposed project includes the development of a 400,000 square foot research and development facility (the
“R&D Facility”) within the Project Area. The development will also include corresponding site work, infrastructure,
and parking improvements associated with R&D Facility.
The City anticipates using tax increment to reimburse 3M for a portion of the TIF eligible project costs occurred in the
development of the R&D Facility. Included in the projected eligible costs to be reimbursed are costs associated with
demolition of existing buildings, relocation of employees within buildings, site work, footings & foundations, private
utility improvements, and other eligible improvements associated with the facility. Additionally, the City anticipates
using tax increment to finance public improvements and site work on property located within the Project Area, along
with related administrative expenses.
Construction of the R&D Facility is expected to begin in 2013, and be completed by 2015. The R&D Facility is
projected to be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2016 for taxes payable in 2017.
At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contacts with regards to the above
described development.
Under the Special Law the expenditures outside district rule under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763,
subdivision 2, does not apply; and tax increments can only be spent within the Project Area. Therefore costs eligible
for TIF reimbursement may be incurred outside of the TIF District, but must be within the boundaries of the Project
Area.
Section K Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing
In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings:
(1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district;
See Section F of this document for the reasons and facts supporting this finding.
(2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased
market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from
the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for
the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan.
Factual basis:
Proposed development not expected to occur:
The development includes the construction of the R&D Facility. A key component to the development is the
reimbursement of eligible expenses through tax increments. The company has indicated they would not
undertake the proposed development without the financial assistance. Without the assistance the City has no
reason to expect that significant reinvestment in the campus would occur without assistance similar to that
provided in this plan. Therefore the City has no reason to believe the development would occur but-for the use
of tax increment assistance.
To summarize the basis for the City’s findings regarding alternative market value, in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3(d), the City makes the following determinations:
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 111 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 4
a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without
the use of tax increment financing is anywhere from $0 (except for a small amount for annual
appreciation of land value)
b. If the proposed development to be assisted with tax increment occurs in the District, the total
increase in market value would be approximately $24,720,000, including the value of the building
(See Exhibit II). Prior to the inclusion of a 2% market value inflator starting in 2014.
c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district
permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $11,794,711 (See Exhibit V)
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council
finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than
$12,925,289 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance.
(3) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for development of the Project Area by private enterprise.
Factual basis: The anticipated development of the project site is to include the construction of the R&D
Facility. The Development will result in the retention of up to 700 high-paying jobs within the City. The
development clearly meets the economic development goals of the City.
(4) The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole.
Factual basis: The City Planning Commission has determined that the development proposed in the TIF Plan
conforms to the City comprehensive plan.
(5) The City does not elect the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(b); therefore subdivision 3(a) shall apply which indicates the
original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the application
of the fiscal disparity provisions (see method (a) in Section P).
Section L Estimated Public Costs
The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax
increments of the TIF District.
Private TIF eligible improvements, including
demolition, relocation, site
improvements/preparation costs, related
infrastructure and other eligible improvements
$9,568,000
Bond/Note Interest Payments 10,102,178
Public site work/infrastructure costs and
Administrative expenses
4,921,518
Other Expenditures 0
Total $24,591,696
The City reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate
additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. The City reserves the right to
spend available tax increment outside of the TIF District boundaries but within the Project Area.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 112 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 5
Section M Estimated Sources of Revenue
Tax Increment revenue $24,591,696
Interest on invested funds 0
Bond proceeds 0
Loan proceeds 0
Grants 0
Other 0
Total $24,591,696
The City anticipates using future tax increments for reimbursement of public costs incurred from Section L. As
increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, these tax increments will be reserved by the City as
reimbursement for public costs incurred (primarily site work/infrastructure costs), either through internal funding or
general obligation or revenue debt. The City also anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed
development through the use of pay-as-you-go financing. With pay-as-you-go financing, as tax increments are
collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these tax increments will be distributed to the company as
reimbursement for eligible costs incurred related to the development of the R&D Facility.
The City reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance,
internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The City
also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs
including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income.
Section N Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness
The City may consider issuing tax increment bonds to finance all or a portion of the estimated public costs, and
reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed $18,836,373 ($14,489,518 + 30% contingency).
Section O Original Net Tax Capacity
The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total
net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts
certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For
districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year.
The parcel to be located within the TIF District is an approximately 28.54 acre area of land which is currently part of
a larger 411 acre parcel. As a result the Estimated Market Value for the land within the TIF District as of January 2,
2013 for taxes payable in 2014, is not yet known. However, for purposes of the revenue projections in this TIF Plan,
the City has assumed a pro-rata share of the land market value of the 411 acre parcel will be applied to the newly
created parcel within the TIF District. Therefore the assumed original net tax capacity of the TIF District is $163,106.
This assumes the property remains classified commercial/industrial.
Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased
as a result of:
(1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property;
(2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District;
(3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or
(4) changes in property classification rates.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 113 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 6
Section P Original Local Tax Rate
The County Auditor shall also certify the original local tax rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all
local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the
original net tax capacity.
In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of
(a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original local tax rate of the TIF District.
At the time this document was prepared, the sum of the local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for
taxes levied in 2013 and payable in 2014, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County
Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the
tax increment generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2012 and payable in
2013, is 157.971% as shown below.
2012/2013
Taxing Jurisdiction Local Tax Rate
City of Maplewood 48.659%
Ramsey County 65.240%
ISD # 622 32.520%
Other 11.520%
Total 157.971%
Section Q Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and
Projected Tax Increment
The City anticipates that development will be initiated in 2013, creating a total tax capacity for the TIF District No. 1-
12 of $283,106 as of January 2, 2014. The captured tax capacity as of that date is estimated to be $120,000 and
the first-year of tax increment is estimated to be $189,565 payable in 2015. The first full year of increment is
projected to be in $792,458 in taxes payable 2017. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF
District is shown in Exhibit IV.
The estimates shown in this TIF Plan assume that commercial class rates remain at 1.5% for the first $150,000 of
estimated market value and 2.0% of the market value above $150,000. The projections also assume a 2% annual
increase in market values.
Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the
extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District.
For communities affected by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F and Chapter 276A,
the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before the application of fiscal disparity. In
subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall either (a) be determined before the application of fiscal disparity
or (b) exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax capacity was
certified) times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the City elects shall remain the same for the life of
the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method (a) to method (b) above. »The
City elects method (a), or M.S. Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(a).
The County Auditor shall certify to the City the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The City may choose
to retain any or all of this amount. It is the City's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF
District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 114 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 7
Exhibit III gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits
contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit IV which shows the projected tax increment generated over the
anticipated life of the TIF District.
Section R Use of Tax Increment
Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and
pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of
financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit IV shows the
projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District.
The City has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of
the following purposes:
(1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative
costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T);
(2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated
public costs of the TIF District;
(3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to
finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District;
(4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S.
Section 469.175, Subdivision 1a; or
(5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and
School District.
Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project
located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be
used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City.
Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a
building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or
any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park,
or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction
or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes.
If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance,
to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be
subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less
than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest
rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the
developer or beneficiary.
Section S Excess Tax Increment
In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated
public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the City shall use the excess tax increments to:
(1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds;
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 115 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 8
(2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof;
(3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or
(4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and
School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of
any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution.
Section T Tax Increment Pooling and the Ten Year Rule
Under the Special Law the expenditures outside district rule under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763 subdivision
2, does not apply; the five-year rule under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763, subdivision 3, is extended to ten
years; and expenditures must only be made within the Project Area.
Up to 10% of the tax increments may be spent on costs for eligible administrative expenses.
Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District or project area if such amounts are:
(1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within ten years after
certification of the district;
(2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably
expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the ten-year period or a reasonable
temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund.
(3) used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities
performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within ten years after certification of the
district; or
(4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within ten years
from certification of the district.
Beginning with the eleventh year following certification of the TIF District, at least 90% of the tax increments must be
used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first ten years. When outstanding
bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF
District must be decertified.
Section U Limitation on Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the City other than:
(1) amounts paid for the purchase of land;
(2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly
connected with the physical development of the real property in the project;
(3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the
project;
(4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to section 469.178; or
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 116 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 9
(5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to
finance costs described in clause (1) to (3).
Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or
economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax
increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total tax
increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increments received by the TIF District.
Section V Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - One Year Rule
Under the Special Law if after one year from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax
increment district, no demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property has been commenced on a parcel located
within the TIF District, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel, and the original net tax capacity of
the parcel shall be excluded from the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. If 3M subsequently commences
demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that the activity has commenced,
and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of
Revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The City must submit to the County Auditor
evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District.
Section W Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Exhibit V shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net
tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City believes that
there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed
development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public
assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the
development therein becomes part of the general tax base.
The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2, are listed below.
1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the TIF District is estimated to be
$24,680,546.
2. To the extent the project in the TIF District generates any public cost impacts on City-provided services
such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and the impact of any general obligation tax
increment bonds attributable to the TIF District upon the ability to issue other debt for general fund
purposes, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion
captured by the TIF District.
3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the TIF District that would be attributable to School District
levies, assuming the School District’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the
same, is estimated to be $5,085,751.
4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the TIF District that would be attributable to County levies,
assuming the County’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is
estimated to be $10,192,750.
5. No additional information has been requested by the County or School District that would enable it to
determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 117 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 10
Section X Prior Planned Improvements
The City shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a
listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months
immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of
the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued.
There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the
TIF District.
Section Y Development Agreements
If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25% of the acreage of the property to be acquired
by the City is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged),
then prior to such acquisition, the City must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such
agreement must provide recourse for the City should the development not be completed.
The City anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring property located
within the TIF District.
Section Z Assessment Agreements
The City may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the
developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of
the TIF District.
The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and
specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and
so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate,
shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the
office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature
termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District.
The City does not anticipate entering into an assessment agreement, however it reserves the right to enter into an
assessment agreement for individual projects.
Section AA Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Development District or the TIF District; a determination
to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not part of the original TIF Plan, increase in the portion of
the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the City; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of
property to be acquired by the City shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for
approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if:
(1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and
(2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of
those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City agrees that the TIF District's
original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels
eliminated.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 118 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 11
The City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF
District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date
of certification.
Section AB Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the City shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue
and the Office of the State Auditor. The City shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax
capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, t he City shall
submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of
any prior planned improvements. The City shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement
establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the
County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable.
The County shall distribute to the City the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax
increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity
of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other
development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering
and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis:
(1) prior to July 1, the City shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred
in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely
manner.
(2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification
of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax
rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be
used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years.
(3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following:
(a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the
original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply;
(b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction
of the TIF District;
(c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of
estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting
increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original
net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall notify the City of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Section AC Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements
The City will file the TIF Plan, and any subsequent amendments thereto, with the Commissioner of Revenue and the
Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4A. The City will comply
with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivisions 5 and 6.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 119 of 275
Exhibit II
SPRINGSTED Page 12
MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-12
Within Development District No. 1
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 120 of 275
Exhibit II
SPRINGSTED Page 13
MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-12
Within 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 121 of 275
Exhibit III
SPRINGSTED Page 14
Assumptions Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Type of Tax Increment Financing District Redevelopment
Maximum Duration of TIF District 25 years from 1st increment
Projected Certification Request Date 07/23/13
Decertification Date 12/31/40 (26 Years of Increment)
2012/2013
Base Estimated Market Value $8,155,288
Original Net Tax Capacity $163,106
Assessment/Collection Year
2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016
Base Estimated Market Value $8,155,288 $8,155,288 $8,155,288 $8,155,288
Estimated Increase in Value - New Construction 0 0 6,000,000 12,120,000
Total Estimated Market Value 8,155,288 8,155,288 14,155,288 20,275,288
Total Net Tax Capacity $163,106 $163,106 $283,106 $405,506
City of Maplewood 48.659%
Ramsey County 65.240%
ISD #622 32.552%
Other 11.520%
Local Tax Capacity Rate 157.971%2012/2013
Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 0.0000%
Administrative & Pooling Retainage Percent 20.00%
Bonds Note (Pay-As-You-Go)
Bonds Dated NA Note Dated 06/30/13
Bond Rate NA Note Rate 5.00%
Bond Amount NA Note Amount $9,568,000
Present Value Date & Rate 12/01/13 5.00%PV Amount $9,518,467
Notes
Projections assume no future changes to classification rates and current tax rates remain constant,
and a 2% market value inflator.
Projections are based on EMV growth of $24.72M. Constructed between 2013-2015.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 122 of 275
Exhibit IV
SPRINGSTED Page 15
Projected Tax Increment Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Less: Less: Retained Times:Less:Total Annual
Annual Incremental Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Subtotal City Pooling Net
Period Market Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Net Tax Retainage Revenue
Ending Value Capacity Capacity 0.0000% Capacity Rate Increment 0.360% Increment 20.00%80%
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14)
12/31/15 6,000,000 283,106 163,106 0 120,000 157.971% 189,565 682 188,883 37,777 151,106
12/31/16 12,120,000 405,506 163,106 0 242,400 157.971% 382,922 1,379 381,543 76,309 305,234
12/31/17 25,082,400 664,754 163,106 0 501,648 157.971% 792,458 2,853 789,605 157,921 631,684
12/31/18 25,584,048 674,787 163,106 0 511,681 157.971% 808,308 2,910 805,398 161,080 644,318
12/31/19 26,095,729 685,020 163,106 0 521,915 157.971% 824,474 2,968 821,506 164,301 657,205
12/31/20 26,617,644 695,459 163,106 0 532,353 157.971% 840,963 3,027 837,936 167,587 670,349
12/31/21 27,149,996 706,106 163,106 0 543,000 157.971% 857,782 3,088 854,694 170,939 683,755
12/31/22 27,692,996 716,966 163,106 0 553,860 157.971% 874,938 3,150 871,788 174,358 697,430
12/31/23 28,246,856 728,043 163,106 0 564,937 157.971% 892,437 3,213 889,224 177,845 711,379
12/31/24 28,811,793 739,342 163,106 0 576,236 157.971% 910,286 3,277 907,009 181,402 725,607
12/31/25 29,388,029 750,866 163,106 0 587,761 157.971% 928,491 3,343 925,148 185,030 740,118
12/31/26 29,975,790 762,622 163,106 0 599,516 157.971% 947,061 3,409 943,652 188,730 754,922
12/31/27 30,575,306 774,612 163,106 0 611,506 157.971% 966,002 3,478 962,524 192,505 770,019
12/31/28 31,186,812 786,842 163,106 0 623,736 157.971% 985,322 3,547 981,775 196,355 785,420
12/31/29 31,810,548 799,317 163,106 0 636,211 157.971% 1,005,029 3,618 1,001,411 200,282 801,129
12/31/30 32,446,759 812,041 163,106 0 648,935 157.971% 1,025,129 3,690 1,021,439 204,288 817,151
12/31/31 33,095,694 825,020 163,106 0 661,914 157.971% 1,045,632 3,764 1,041,868 208,374 833,494
12/31/32 33,757,608 838,258 163,106 0 675,152 157.971% 1,066,545 3,840 1,062,705 212,541 850,164
12/31/33 34,432,760 851,761 163,106 0 688,655 157.971% 1,087,876 3,916 1,083,960 216,792 867,168
12/31/34 35,121,415 865,534 163,106 0 702,428 157.971% 1,109,633 3,995 1,105,638 221,128 884,510
12/31/35 35,823,844 879,583 163,106 0 716,477 157.971% 1,131,826 4,075 1,127,751 225,550 902,201
12/31/36 36,540,321 893,912 163,106 0 730,806 157.971% 1,154,462 4,156 1,150,306 230,061 920,245
12/31/37 37,271,127 908,528 163,106 0 745,423 157.971% 1,177,551 4,239 1,173,312 234,662 938,650
12/31/38 38,016,550 923,437 163,106 0 760,331 157.971% 1,201,102 4,324 1,196,778 239,356 957,422
12/31/39 38,776,880 938,643 163,106 0 775,538 157.971% 1,225,125 4,410 1,220,715 244,143 976,572
12/31/40 39,552,418 954,154 163,106 0 791,048 157.971% 1,249,627 4,499 1,245,128 249,026 996,102
$24,680,546 $88,850 $24,591,696 $4,918,342 $19,673,354
NPV: $2,379,619
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 123 of 275
Exhibit V
SPRINGSTED Page 16
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Without
Project or TIF District With Project and TIF District
Final Projected Hypothetical
2012/2013 2012/2013 Retained New Hypothetical Hypothetical Tax Generated
Taxable 2012/2013 Taxable Captured Taxable Adjusted Decrease In by Retained
Taxing Net Tax Local Net Tax Net Tax Net Tax Local Local Captured
Jurisdiction Capacity (1) Tax Rate Capacity (1) + Capacity = Capacity Tax Rate (*) Tax Rate (*) N.T.C. (*)
City of Maplewood 31,936,556 48.659% 31,936,556 $791,048 32,727,604 47.483% 1.176% 375,613
Ramsey County 367,782,031 65.240% 367,782,031 791,048 368,573,079 65.100% 0.140% 514,972
ISD #622 62,433,416 32.552% 62,433,416 791,048 63,224,464 32.145% 0.407% 254,280
Other (2)--- 11.520% --- 791,048 --- 11.520% --- ---
Totals 157.971%156.248% 1.723%
* Statement 1: If the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to each of
the taxing jurisdictions above, the result would be a lower local tax rate (see Hypothetical Adjusted Tax Rate above)
which would produce the same amount of taxes for each taxing jurisdiction. In such a case, the total local tax rate
would decrease by 1.723% (see Hypothetical Decrease in Local Tax Rate above). The hypothetical tax that the
Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District would generate is also shown above.
Statement 2: Since the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District is not available to the taxing jurisdictions,
then there is no impact on taxes levied or local tax rates.
(1) Taxable net tax capacity = total net tax capacity - captured TIF - fiscal disparity contribution, if applicable.
(2) The impact on these taxing jurisdictions is negligible since they represent only 7.29% of the total tax rate.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 124 of 275
Exhibit VI
SPRINGSTED
Market Value Analysis Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Assumptions
Present Value Date 06/30/13
P.V. Rate - Gross T.I.5.00%
Increase in EMV With TIF District $24,720,000
Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment 11,794,711
Subtotal $12,925,289
Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF 0
Difference $12,925,289
Annual Present
Gross Tax Value @
Year Increment 5.00%
1 2015 189,565 169,834
2 2016 382,922 326,728
3 2017 792,458 643,966
4 2018 808,308 625,568
5 2019 824,474 607,694
6 2020 840,963 590,331
7 2021 857,782 573,464
8 2022 874,938 557,080
9 2023 892,437 541,163
10 2024 910,286 525,702
11 2025 928,491 510,681
12 2026 947,061 496,090
13 2027 966,002 481,916
14 2028 985,322 468,147
15 2029 1,005,029 454,772
16 2030 1,025,129 441,778
17 2031 1,045,632 429,156
18 2032 1,066,545 416,895
19 2033 1,087,876 404,983
20 2034 1,109,633 393,412
21 2035 1,131,826 382,172
22 2036 1,154,462 371,253
23 2037 1,177,551 360,645
24 2038 1,201,102 350,341
25 2039 1,225,125 340,332
26 2040 1,249,627 330,608
$24,680,546 $11,794,711
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 125 of 275
Exhibit VII
SPRINGSTED
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Note Date: 06/30/13
Note Rate:5.00%
Amount: $9,568,000
Cumulative Unpaid Semi-Annual Loan
Interest Accrued Net Balance
Date Principal Interest P & I Due Interest Revenue Outstanding
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
9,568,000.00
08/01/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,195.56 41,195.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 280,395.56 280,395.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 519,595.56 519,595.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/15 0.00 0.00 0.00 758,795.56 758,795.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/15 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 997,995.56 922,442.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/16 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 1,161,642.56 1,086,089.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/16 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,325,289.56 1,172,672.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/17 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,411,872.56 1,259,255.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/17 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,498,455.56 1,182,613.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/18 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,421,813.56 1,105,971.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/18 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,345,171.56 1,023,012.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/19 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,262,212.56 940,053.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/19 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,179,253.56 850,651.06 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/20 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,089,851.06 761,248.56 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/20 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 1,000,448.56 665,274.06 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/21 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 904,474.06 569,299.56 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/21 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 808,499.56 466,622.06 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/22 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 705,822.06 363,944.56 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/22 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 603,144.56 254,429.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/23 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 493,629.56 144,914.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/23 0.00 355,689.50 355,689.50 384,114.56 28,425.06 355,689.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/24 88,064.44 267,625.06 355,689.50 267,625.06 0.00 355,689.50 9,479,935.56
08/01/24 125,805.11 236,998.39 362,803.50 236,998.39 0.00 362,803.50 9,354,130.45
02/01/25 128,950.24 233,853.26 362,803.50 233,853.26 0.00 362,803.50 9,225,180.21
08/01/25 139,429.49 230,629.51 370,059.00 230,629.51 0.00 370,059.00 9,085,750.72
02/01/26 142,915.23 227,143.77 370,059.00 227,143.77 0.00 370,059.00 8,942,835.49
08/01/26 153,890.11 223,570.89 377,461.00 223,570.89 0.00 377,461.00 8,788,945.38
02/01/27 157,737.37 219,723.63 377,461.00 219,723.63 0.00 377,461.00 8,631,208.01
08/01/27 169,229.30 215,780.20 385,009.50 215,780.20 0.00 385,009.50 8,461,978.71
02/01/28 173,460.03 211,549.47 385,009.50 211,549.47 0.00 385,009.50 8,288,518.68
08/01/28 185,497.03 207,212.97 392,710.00 207,212.97 0.00 392,710.00 8,103,021.65
02/01/29 190,134.46 202,575.54 392,710.00 202,575.54 0.00 392,710.00 7,912,887.19
08/01/29 202,742.32 197,822.18 400,564.50 197,822.18 0.00 400,564.50 7,710,144.87
02/01/30 207,810.88 192,753.62 400,564.50 192,753.62 0.00 400,564.50 7,502,333.99
08/01/30 221,017.15 187,558.35 408,575.50 187,558.35 0.00 408,575.50 7,281,316.84
02/01/31 226,542.58 182,032.92 408,575.50 182,032.92 0.00 408,575.50 7,054,774.26
08/01/31 240,377.64 176,369.36 416,747.00 176,369.36 0.00 416,747.00 6,814,396.62
02/01/32 246,387.08 170,359.92 416,747.00 170,359.92 0.00 416,747.00 6,568,009.54
08/01/32 260,881.76 164,200.24 425,082.00 164,200.24 0.00 425,082.00 6,307,127.78
02/01/33 267,403.81 157,678.19 425,082.00 157,678.19 0.00 425,082.00 6,039,723.97
08/01/33 282,590.90 150,993.10 433,584.00 150,993.10 0.00 433,584.00 5,757,133.07
02/01/34 289,655.67 143,928.33 433,584.00 143,928.33 0.00 433,584.00 5,467,477.40
08/01/34 305,568.06 136,686.94 442,255.00 136,686.94 0.00 442,255.00 5,161,909.34
02/01/35 313,207.27 129,047.73 442,255.00 129,047.73 0.00 442,255.00 4,848,702.07
08/01/35 329,882.95 121,217.55 451,100.50 121,217.55 0.00 451,100.50 4,518,819.12
02/01/36 338,130.02 112,970.48 451,100.50 112,970.48 0.00 451,100.50 4,180,689.10
08/01/36 355,605.27 104,517.23 460,122.50 104,517.23 0.00 460,122.50 3,825,083.83
02/01/37 364,495.40 95,627.10 460,122.50 95,627.10 0.00 460,122.50 3,460,588.43
08/01/37 382,810.29 86,514.71 469,325.00 86,514.71 0.00 469,325.00 3,077,778.14
02/01/38 392,380.55 76,944.45 469,325.00 76,944.45 0.00 469,325.00 2,685,397.59
08/01/38 411,576.06 67,134.94 478,711.00 67,134.94 0.00 478,711.00 2,273,821.53
02/01/39 421,865.46 56,845.54 478,711.00 56,845.54 0.00 478,711.00 1,851,956.07
08/01/39 441,987.10 46,298.90 488,286.00 46,298.90 0.00 488,286.00 1,409,968.97
02/01/40 453,036.78 35,249.22 488,286.00 35,249.22 0.00 488,286.00 956,932.19
08/01/40 474,127.70 23,923.30 498,051.00 23,923.30 0.00 498,051.00 482,804.49
02/01/41 482,804.49 12,070.11 494,874.60 12,070.11 0.00 494,874.60 0.00
$9,568,000 $10,102,177.60 $19,670,177.60 $24,499,080.36 $14,396,902.76 $19,670,177.60
Surplus Tax Increment 3,176.40
Total Net Revenue $19,673,354.00
Projected Pay-As-You-Go Note Report
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 126 of 275
5536499v1
MODIFICATION TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Draft: July 22, 2013
This document was drafted by: BRIGGS AND MORGAN,
Professional Association
2200 West First National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Financial Information Springsted Incorporated
provided by: 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 127 of 275
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
i
SECTION I DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
NO. 1 ................................................................................................................ 3
1.1. Definitions.............................................................................................................. 3
1.2. Statement of Public Purpose .................................................................................. 4
1.3. Statutory Authority ................................................................................................ 5
1.4. Statement of Need .................................................................................................. 6
1.5. Statement of Objectives ......................................................................................... 6
1.6. Boundaries of Development District ..................................................................... 7
1.7. Development Activities ......................................................................................... 7
1.8. Payment of Project Cost ......................................................................................... 9
1.9. Environmental Controls ......................................................................................... 9
1.10. Park and Open Space to be Created ....................................................................... 9
1.11. Proposed Reuse of Property ................................................................................. 10
1.12. Administration and Maintenance of Development District ................................. 10
1.13. Rehabilitation ....................................................................................................... 10
1.14. Relocation ............................................................................................................ 10
1.15. Parcels To Be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development
District.................................................................................................................. 10
1.16. Amendments ........................................................................................................ 11
1.17. Development Activity in the Development District for which Contracts
Have Been Signed ................................................................................................ 11
1.18. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within The Development
District.................................................................................................................. 12
Exhibit A Boundaries of Development District No. 1 .................................................. A-1
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 128 of 275
5536499v1
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Based upon the statutory authority described in the Modified Development Program
attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling
the City's development objectives as set forth in the Modified Development Program, the City
Council has created, established and designated Development District No. 1 pursuant to and in
accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.126.
The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith:
October 28, 1985: The Program for Development District No. 1 was adopted by the City
Council.
June 23, 1986: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
September 28, 1987: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
enlargement of the geographic Project Area and increased Project Costs.
January 11, 1988: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
May 8, 1989: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
October 9, 1989: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
April 23, 1990: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
December 23, 1991: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
February 10, 1992: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
May 24, 1993: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
May 8, 1995: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
June 28, 1999: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
enlargement of the geographic Project Area and increased Project Costs.
August 13, 2001: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
increased Project Costs.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 129 of 275
5536499v1
2
May 12, 2003: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs.
June 23, 2003: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-8 within
Development District No. 1 was adopted.
August 25, 2008: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
increased Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-9
within Development District No. 1 was adopted.
August 9, 2010: The program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
increased Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-10
within Development District No. 1 was adopted.
April 25, 2011: The program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
increased Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development
District No. 1-11 within Development District No. 1 was adopted.
July 22, 2013: The program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District No. 1-12 within
Development District No. 1 was adopted.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 130 of 275
5536499v1
3
SECTION I
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
1.1. Definitions. The terms defined below have, for purposes of this Development
Program, the meanings herein specified, unless the context specifically requires otherwise:
"City" means the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and political subdivision
of the State of Minnesota. The City has a Statutory City Plan A form of government.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan submitted to the
Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 473.173, which contains the objectives,
policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development,
redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City.
"Council" means the City Council of the City, also referred to as the governing body.
(See "Governing Body" below.)
"County" means the County of Ramsey, Minnesota.
"Development District Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended and supplemented.
"Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is created
and established hereto pursuant to and in accordance with the Development District Act, and is
geographically described in Exhibit A.
"Development Program" means this Development Program for Development District No.
1, initially adopted by the Council on October 28, 1985 and modified on June 23, 1986,
September 28, 1987, January 11, 1988, May 8, 1989, October 9, 1989, April 23, 1990, December
23, 1991, February 10, 1992, May 24, 1993, May 8, 1995, June 28, 1999, August 13, 2001, May
12, 2003, June 23, 2003, August 25, 2008, August 9, 2010, April 25, 2011, and July 22, 2013.
As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 3, a development program is a
statement of objectives of the City for improvement of a development district which contains a
complete statement as to the public facilities to be constructed within the district, the open space
to be created, the environmental controls to be applied, the proposed reuse of private property
and the proposed operations of the district after the capital improvements within the district have
been completed.
"Economic Development District" means a type of tax increment financing district which
consists of any project, or portions of a project, not meeting the requirements found in the
definition of redevelopment district, renewal and renovation district, soils condition district,
mined underground space development district, or housing district, but which the City finds to be
in the public interest because:
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 131 of 275
5536499v1
4
(a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations
to another municipality; or
(b) It will result in increased employment in the state; or
(c) It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state.
"Governing Body" means the duly elected City Council as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.125, Subd. 8.
"Housing District" means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a
project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low
and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1937,
as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future
federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 11.
"Municipal Industrial Development Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended.
"Municipality" means any city, however organized as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.125, Subd. 2.
"3M Renovation and Retention Project Area" means the land identified as Parcel
362922240002.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds
issued and to be issued by the City to finance the project costs associated with Development
District No. 1 as stated in the Development Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
the Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1. The term "Tax
Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds.
"Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently
established or to be established in the future in Development District No. 1.
"Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, inclusive, as amended.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the respective Tax Increment Financing Plan for
each Tax Increment Financing District located within the Development District.
1.2. Statement of Public Purpose. The Council (the "Council") in and for the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") has determined that there is a need for housing,
development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City to provide employment
opportunities, to enhance development opportunities for the private sector, to improve the tax
base and to improve the general economy of the City, the County of Ramsey and the State of
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 132 of 275
5536499v1
5
Minnesota. It is found that there are certain parcels of property within the Development District
which are potentially more useful, productive and valuable than is being realized under existing
conditions, is less productive because of the lack of proper utilization, and, therefore, are not
contributing to the tax base of the City to their full potential. In addition, it is hereby found that
there is a need for public improvements to encourage development.
Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for
improving the Development District of the City to provide impetus for private development, to
maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as
are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City.
The Council has also determined that the proposed developments would not occur solely
through private investment in the foreseeable future; that the tax increment financing plans
proposed herein are consistent with the Development Program; and that the tax increment
financing plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the
municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Development District by
private enterprise.
The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires
active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry
and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives.
1.3. Statutory Authority. The Development District Act, authorizes the City, upon
certain public purpose findings by the Council, to establish and designate development districts
within the City and to establish, develop and administer development programs in regard thereto,
all for the purpose of creating funding for the financing of necessary activities and improvements
within the City.
In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District
Act, the Council hereby establishes Development District No. 1, as described in Exhibit A, for
the purposes of enhancing the environment in which existing businesses are located, thus helping
to secure their continued existence and potential additional development within the City, and
promoting new and ongoing development in Development District No. 1, both of which will
provide employment opportunities, improve the tax base of the City and contribute positively to
the economy of the State.
The Tax Increment Financing Act, provides the procedure for the establishment of tax
increment districts for the use of tax increment financing authorized by the Development District
Act for the funding of qualified public activities and improvements.
Within the Development District, the City has established ten housing districts as the
types of tax increment financing district described in Section 469.174, Subd. 11 for Housing
District No. 1-1, Housing District No. 1-2, Housing District No. 1-3, Housing District No. 1-4,
Housing District No. 1-5, Housing District No. 1-6, Housing District No. 1-7, Housing District
No. 1-8, Housing District No. 1-9, and Housing District No. 1-10. The City has established six
economic development districts as the types of tax increment financing district described in
Section 469.174, Subd. 12 for Economic Development District No. 1-1, Economic Development
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 133 of 275
5536499v1
6
District No. 1-2, Economic Development District No. 1-3, Economic Development District No.
1-4, Economic Development District No. 1-5, and Economic Development District No. 1-11, and
a redevelopment district as permitted under Minnesota Laws, 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9,
Section 21.
1.4. Statement of Need. The Development District is established by the City of
Maplewood for the purpose of promoting the redevelopment of existing commercial areas and
the development of new business opportunities within the community. The City has found that
the area within the Development District has not realized its greatest development potential due
to a variety of factors. Included in the development barriers identified by the City are:
inadequate public improvements, improper land use and utilization, and lack of investment. The
City has found that the creation of the Development District and the utilization of tax increment
financing is needed to remove these barriers and to promote development of the community.
1.5. Statement of Objectives. The Council determines that it is necessary, desirable
and in the public interest to establish the Development District in the City, pursuant to the
authority of the Development District Act. The Council finds that the creation of the
Development District is necessary to give the City the ability to meet certain public purpose
objectives that would not be otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without intervention
by the City in the normal development process.
The City intends to satisfy the following objectives through the implementation of the
Development Program:
(a) To provide safe, decent, sanitary housing for all residents of the city and in
particular low and moderate income residents.
(b) To provide an adequate housing supply for all residents at a cost they can
afford.
(c) To provide housing choices for low and moderate income residents who
find housing opportunities are not available to them because of economic conditions.
(d) To provide project activities which will assist in making possible the
construction of a planned apartment for low and moderate income residents, as well, as
improving health, welfare and convenience of citizens residing in the Development District.
(e) Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements,
including recreational and community center facilities, in the Development District, necessary
for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District and adjacent areas of the
City and the provision of adequate City services to the City residents.
(f) Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the
Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use,
in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact
on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 134 of 275
5536499v1
7
(g) Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the
Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby
improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor
and other human resources in the City.
(h) Secure the increase of property subject to taxation by the City,
Independent School Districts Nos. 622, 623 and 624, Northwest Metropolitan Intermediate
District No. 916, Ramsey County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such
entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them.
(i) Promote the concentration of new desirable residential, commercial,
office, restaurant, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to
maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City.
(j) Encourage local business expansion, improvement and development,
whenever possible.
(k) Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District
through quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings.
(l) Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment
of existing areas and structures which are compatible with the Development Program.
1.6. Boundaries of Development District. The area within the Development District is
set forth in Exhibit A.
1.7. Development Activities. Development activities within the Development District
must be financially feasible, marketable and be compatible with long range development
strategies of the City. The following recommendations represent the options that satisfy
community development objectives for the Development District while taking advantage of
opportunities which are currently available. The City will perform all project activities pursuant
to the statute and in doing so, anticipates that the following may, but are not required to be
undertaken:
(a) The making of studies, planning, and informal activities relating to the
Development Program.
(b) The implementation and administration of the Development Program.
(c) The construction or reconstruction of streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other
public improvements including but not limited to:
(1) the construction of street, water and sewer improvements on Southlawn
Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D;
(2) the construction of street, water and sewer improvements on McKnight
Road from Highway 36 to Conway Avenue;
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 135 of 275
5536499v1
8
(3) the construction of a water tower on Stillwater Road east of Sterling;
(4) the construction of water main on Hudson place;
(5) the installation of traffic lights at Hazelwood Avenue and Southlawn
Avenue on Beam Avenue.
(6) acquisition of land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at County
Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue;
(7) improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight
Road;
(8) acquisition, expansion and improvement of Harvest Park located at
Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36;
(9) the construction of water, street, sanitary sewer and storm sewer
improvements within an area North of Beam Avenue, South of the Northern City limit,
East of Highway 61 and West of White Bear Avenue;
(10) acquisition of the abandoned Burlington Northern railroad right of way
running from Larpenteur Street to Highway 694;
(11) acquisition of the land that the Cottages of Maplewood will be developed
on and the payment of certain site improvements for the Cottages of Maplewood project;
(12) acquisition and betterment of a city recreational and community center
facility;
(13) improvement of Sherwood Park located at Hazelwood and Cope Avenues;
(14) improvement of Afton Heights Park, Geranium Park, Gethsemane Park,
Gladstone Park, Goodrich Park, Hillside Park, Lion's Park, Maplecrest Park, Maplewood
Heights Park, Nature Center, Robinhood Park, Sherwood Park and Timber Park;
(15) construction of a municipal storage building to house park equipment;
(16) construction of public alleys east of White Bear Avenue from Woodlyn
Avenue to County Road D and a public alley southwest of the southwest corner of Beam
Avenue and White Bear Avenue;
(17) construction of traffic improvements on White Bear Avenue from
Interstate Highway 694 to Beam Avenue; and
(18) bike path along McKnight Road (County State Aid Highway 68) from a
point 788.17 feet north of the Southwest Corner of Section 36, Township 29N, Range
22W to a point 37.00 feet south of the West Quarter Corner of Section 36 Township 29N,
Range 22W.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 136 of 275
5536499v1
9
(19) the construction of an approximately 400,000 square foot research and
development facility and outdoor parking of approximately 725 spaces within the 3M
Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of parcel 362922240002;
(d) The acquisition of property consistent with the objectives of the
Development Program.
(e) The preparation of property for use including demolition of structures,
clearance of sites, placement of fill, and installation of utilities.
(f) The resale of property to developers.
(g) The provision of relocation assistance to businesses and homeowners as
may be required by this Development Program.
(h) The issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance project costs of the
Development Program or to evidence the City's obligation to reimburse developers for all or part
of the project costs of the Development Program incurred or to be incurred by it pursuant to a
Development Agreement.
(i) The use of tax increments derived from a Tax Increment Financing
District within the Development District to pay debt service on Tax Increment Bonds or
otherwise pay the project cost of the Development Program.
1.8. Payment of Project Cost. It is anticipated that the project cost of the Development
Program will be paid primarily from the tax increments to be derived from the Development
District, either directly or indirectly by payment of project eligible expenses, by reimbursement
of developers for items of project cost paid directly by developers, or by some combination of
these methods. The City reserves the right to utilize special assessments, general property taxes,
utility revenues, and other sources of revenue which the City may apply to pay the project cost.
The City intends to pool tax increments from all Tax Increment Financing Districts to finance the
project cost of the Development Program within the Development District.
1.9. Environmental Controls. The proposed Tax Increment Financing Districts within
the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal
actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner
consistent with existing environmental standards.
1.10. Park and Open Space to be Created. Park and open space within the
Development District No. 1 will be created in accordance with the zoning and platting
ordinances of the City. The City may undertake the following park improvements:
(a) the acquisition of land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at
County Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue;
(b) the improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight
Road;
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 137 of 275
5536499v1
10
(c) the acquisition, expansion and improvement of Harvest Park located at
Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36;
(d) the improvement of Sherwood Park located at Hazelwood and Cope
Avenues;
(e) the improvement of Afton Heights Park, Geranium Park, Gethsemane
Park, Gladstone Park, Goodrich Park, Hillside Park, Lions Park, Maplecrest Park, Maplewood
Heights, Nature Center, Robinhood Park, Sherwood Park, Timber Park;
(f) the acquisition and improvement of park land adjacent to Housing District
No. 1-9, the acquisition and improvement of the park land will not involve the use of tax
increment revenues.
1.11. Proposed Reuse of Property. The Development Program does not contemplate
the acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an
economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be
considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must
clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the
acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond
and/or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be
available to repay the project cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It shall be the intent
of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions
regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale
contract to which the City is a part.
1.12. Administration and Maintenance of Development District. Maintenance and
operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Manager who shall
serve as administrator of the Development District.
The administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of
Section 469.131 of the Development District Act; provided, however, that such powers may only
be exercised at the direction of the Council. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the
abovementioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Council.
1.13. Rehabilitation. Owners of properties within the Development District will be
encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable state and local codes
and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of properties who purchase property
within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties as
condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be
available from federal, state or local sources.
1.14. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of
the Development Program. The City accepts its responsibility for providing for relocation
pursuant to Section 469.133 of the Development District Act.
1.15. Parcels To Be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District.
The City intends to acquire all or part of the land within Housing District No. 1-3 to facilitate the
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 138 of 275
5536499v1
11
construction of the Cottages of Maplewood housing project. The City intends to reimburse the
developer for the cost of the land within Housing District Nos. 1-4, 1-5 and 1-6 to facilitate the
construction of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood housing project (Phase I, Phase II and
Phase III). The City intends to reimburse the developer for the cost of the land within Housing
District No. 1-7 to facilitate the construction of the Van Dyke Village project. The City intends
to reimburse the developer for the cost of the land within Housing District No. 1-8 to facilitate
the construction of the Sibley Cove project. The City intends to reimburse the developer for the
cost of the land within Housing District No. 1-9 to facilitate the construction of the Gethsemane
Senior Housing project. The City intends to reimburse the developer for the cost of land within
Housing District No. 1-10 to facilitate the construction of the Shores of Maplewood project. The
City intends to finance public improvements related to redevelopment of the Maplewood Mall
within Economic Development District No. 1-11.
1.16. Amendments. The City reserves the right to alter and amend the Development
Program and the tax increment financing plans, subject to the provisions of state law regulating
such action. The City specifically reserves the right to change the size of the Development
District and the Tax Increment Financing Districts, the project cost of the Development Program
and the amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such cost by following the
procedures specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4.
1.17. Development Activity in the Development District for which Contracts Have
Been Signed.
(a) Zantigo Restaurant on County Road was developed by Zantigo Mexican
Restaurants, Inc. on County Road D, West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was William
Kranz Construction and the cost of the project was $260,000.
(b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center was developed by Curt Johnson and
Joe Weis - Weis Builders, Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue.
The contractor was Weis Builders and the cost of the project was $2,318,383.
(c) Maple Ridge Apartments was developed by Podawiltz Development
Company on County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Avon Lumber
Company, Inc. and the cost of the project was $2,800,000.
(d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments was developed by Maple Ridge
Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The
contractor was Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project was $3,999,000.
(e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being developed by CPI. The
contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000.
(f) A Main Street Store at Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated
Department Stores. The contractor is Sheehy Construction and the cost of the project is
$2,000,000.
(g) The expansion of St. John's Northeast Hospital on Beam Avenue.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 139 of 275
5536499v1
12
(h) The development of a 60 unit senior citizen housing complex (known as
the Cottages of Maplewood).
(i) The development of the Crossings Mall to be located adjacent to
Maplewood Mall.
(j) The development of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood senior citizen
housing project.
(k) The acquisition of property located at 2146 White Bear Avenue,
commonly referred to as the Taystee Bread Store in an amount anticipated to be $500,000 or the
development of the Community Park in the amount of $500,000.
(l) The development of the Schroeder Milk project.
(m) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 20 unit townhome-style housing facility in the City (the Van Dyke Village
project) consisting of 8 one-story, two-bedroom and 12 two-story, three-bedroom units.
(n) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 80 unit rental housing facility in the City (the Sibley Cove project) consisting of
two- and three-bedroom units and related amenities.
(o) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 111 unit senior housing facility in the City (the Gethsemane project).
(p) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 162 unit senior housing facility in the City (the Shores of Maplewood project).
(q) The City intends to enter into a development agreement with 3M
Company with respect to the construction of an approximately 400,000 square foot research and
development facility and outdoor parking of approximately 725 within the 3M Renovation and
Retention Project Area (the 3M Research and Development Project).
1.18. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within The Development
District. It is anticipated that development will occur within the Development District as
described in Section 1.17. Additional development may occur in the Development District in the
future; however, no contracts have been entered into at this time with respect to such
development. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at
this time.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 140 of 275
5536499v1
A-1
Exhibit A
Boundaries of Development District No. 1
Consists of the entire corporate boundaries of the City of Maplewood.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 141 of 275
5550642v1
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: July 22, 2013
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City
Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly called and held on the
22nd day of July, 2013, at 7:00 p.m.
The following members of the Council were present:
and the following were absent:
Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-12 THEREIN AND APPROVING A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
WHEREAS:
A. It has been proposed that the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City")
modify the Development Program for Development District No. 1 (the "Development District")
and establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 ("TIF District No. 1-12") therein and
approve and accept the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor all pursuant to and in
accordance with Minnesota Laws, 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21 (the "Special Law"),
and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, both inclusive, as amended and
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, both inclusive, as amended (the "Act");
and
B. Under the Special Law the City has the authority to establish tax
increment financing districts within the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of
Parcel 362922240002 (the "Project Area"); and
C. The Development District and TIF District No. 1-12 are within the Project
Area.
D. It has been proposed by the 3M Company to construct a 400,000 square
foot research and development facility within TIF District No. 1-12 (the "Project"); and
E. The City Council has investigated the facts and has caused to be prepared
a modification to the Development Program for the Development District (the "Development
Program Modification"), and has caused to be prepared a proposed tax increment financing plan
for TIF District No. 1-12 (the "TIF Plan"); and
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 142 of 275
5550642v1
2
F. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior
to the approval of the Development Program Modification and TIF Plan, including, but not
limited to, notification of Ramsey County and School District No. 622 having taxing jurisdiction
over the property to be included in TIF District No. 1-12 and the holding of a public hearing
upon published and mailed notice as required by law; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood as follows:
1. Development Program Modification. The Development Program Modification,
for the Development District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Manager, is
adopted as the development program for the Development District.
2. TIF Plan. The TIF Plan is adopted as the tax increment financing plan for TIF
District No. 1-12, and the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) As provided by the Special Law, the requirements for qualifying TIF
District No. 1-12 as a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
Subdivision 10, do not apply.
(b) In addition, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.176, Subdivision
4c(d), the City finds that the Project will retain jobs in the state and that the construction of the
Project would not have commenced without the tax increment financing assistance to be
provided pursuant to the TIF Plan.
(c) The proposed development in the opinion of the City Council, would not
occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future. The reasons
supporting this finding are that:
(i) Private investment will not finance these development activities due to the
high cost of site improvements and infrastructure costs. The City, without
tax increment assistance, would not have the resources to undertake the
necessary site improvements. It is necessary to finance these development
activities through the use of tax increment financing so that other
development by private enterprise will occur within the Development
District.
(ii) A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without
establishment of TIF District No. 1-12 and the use of tax increments has
been performed as described above. Such analysis is found in Exhibit VI
of the TIF Plan, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value
of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the
estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of TIF District
No. 1-12 and the use of tax increments.
(d) In the opinion of the City Council, the increased market value of the site
that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be
less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 143 of 275
5550642v1
3
after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of
TIF District No. 1-12 permitted by the TIF Plan. The reasons supporting this finding are that:
(i) The estimated amount by which the market value of the site will increase
without the use of tax increment financing is $0, plus a small amount
attributable to appreciation in land value;
(ii) The estimated increase in the market value that will result from the
development to be assisted with tax increment financing is $24,720,000;
and
(iii) The present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum
duration of the district permitted by the tax increment financing plan is
$11,794,711.
(e) The TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-12 conforms to the general plan for
development or redevelopment of the City of Maplewood as a whole. The reasons for
supporting this finding are that:
(i) TIF District No. 1-12 is properly zoned; and
(ii) The Planning Commission of the City has determined that the proposed
TIF Plan conforms to the general plan for the development and
redevelopment of the City as a whole ; and
(iii) The TIF Plan will generally compliment and serve to implement policies
adopted by the City.
(f) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the City of Maplewood as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Project
Area by private enterprise. The reasons supporting this finding are that:
The development activities are necessary so that development and redevelopment
by private enterprise can occur within the Project Area.
3. Public Purpose. The adoption of the Development Program Modification and TIF
Plan conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to
redevelop an area of the State which is already built up to provide employment opportunities and
to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a
public purpose.
4. Certification. The Auditor of Ramsey County is requested to certify the original
net tax capacity of TIF District No. 1-12 as described in TIF Plan, and to certify in each year
thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased in
accordance with the Act; and the City Manager is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit
this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together
with a list of all properties within TIF District No. 1-12 for which building permits have been
issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 144 of 275
5550642v1
4
5. Filing. The City Manager is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the
Development Program Modification and TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-12 with the
Commissioner of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
member _________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 145 of 275
5550642v1
5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RAMSEY COUNTY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Manager of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a
full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City,
duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the
modification to the Development Program for Development District No. 1 and the establishment
of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 therein in the City.
WITNESS my hand this 22nd day of July, 2013.
________________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 146 of 275
5563959v1
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HELD: July 22, 2013
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in said City
on Monday, the 22nd day of July, 2013, at 7:00 o'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member ____________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
A. WHEREAS, 3M Company (the "Developer") has requested the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") to assist with the financing of certain costs incurred in
connection with the construction of a 400,000 square foot research and development facility in
the City by the Developer (the "Project").
B. WHEREAS, the Developer and the City have determined to enter into a Tax
Increment Financing Development Agreement providing for the City's tax increment financing
assistance for the Project (the "Development Agreement").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement in substantially
the form submitted, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City.
2. The approval hereby given to the Development Agreement includes approval of
such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications
thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and
approved by the City officials authorized by this resolution to execute the Development
Agreement. The execution of the Development Agreement by the appropriate officer or officers
of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of the Development Agreement in
accordance with the terms hereof.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 147 of 275
5563959v1
2
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
_________________ and, after full discussion thereof, and upon a vote being taken thereof, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against same:
Adopted this 22nd day of July, 2013.
_________________________
Mayor
Attest: ________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 148 of 275
5563959v1
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Manager of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached
and foregoing extract of minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of
the City held on the date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a Resolution
Authorizing Execution of a Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement.
WITNESS my hand as such Manager of the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota this _____ day of July, 2013.
_____________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 149 of 275
4983374v1
RESOLUTION NO. ____
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TERMS OF UP TO A
$4,918,342 INTERFUND LOAN IN CONNECTION WITH
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-12
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Background.
(a) The City proposes to establish a Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 (the
"TIF District") within Development District No. 1, and proposes to adopt a tax increment
financing plan for the TIF District (the "TIF Plan").
(b) The City has determined to pay for certain costs identified in the TIF Plan
consisting of land/building acquisition, public utilities, site improvements/preparation, other
eligible improvements, and administrative costs (the "Qualified Costs") incurred in connection
with the establishment of the TIF District and development/redevelopment of land within the TIF
District, which costs will be financed on a temporary basis from City funds available for such
purposes.
(c) Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 7, the City is authorized to
advance or loan money from the City's general fund or any other fund from which such advances
may be legally made, in order to finance the Qualified Costs.
(d) The City intends to reimburse itself for the payment of the Qualified Costs, plus
interest thereon, from tax increments derived from the TIF District in accordance with the terms
of this resolution (which terms are referred to collectively as the "Interfund Loan").
Section 2. Terms of Interfund Loan.
(a) The City hereby authorizes the advance of up to $4,918,342 from the City's
General Fund or so much thereof as may be paid as Qualified Costs. The City shall reimburse
itself for such advances together with interest at the rate stated below. Interest accrues on the
principal amount from the date of each advance. The maximum rate of interest permitted to be
charged is limited to the greater of the rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 270C.40
or Section 549.09 as of the date the loan or advance is authorized, unless the written agreement
states that the maximum interest rate will fluctuate as the interest rates specified under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 270C.40 or Section 549.09 are from time to time adjusted. The interest rate
shall be 4% and will not fluctuate.
(b) Principal and interest on the Interfund Loan shall be paid semi-annually on each
February 1 and August 1 (each a "Payment Date") commencing with the Payment Date on which
the City has Available Tax Increment (defined below), or on any other dates determined by the
City Manager, through the last receipt of tax increment from the TIF District.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 150 of 275
4983374v1
2
(c) Payments on the Interfund Loan are payable solely from "Available Tax
Increments" which shall mean, on each Payment Date, all of the tax increment available after
other obligations have been paid, generated in the preceding six (6) months with respect to the
property within the TIF District and remitted to the City by Ramsey County, all in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1799. Payments on the Interfund Loan are
subordinate to any outstanding or future bonds, notes or contracts secured in whole or in part
with Available Tax Increment, and are on parity with any other outstanding or future interfund
loans secured in whole or in part with Available Tax Increment.
(d) The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under the Interfund Loan are
pre-payable in whole or in part at any time by the City without premium or penalty. No partial
prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to
be made under this Interfund Loan.
(e) The Interfund Loan is evidence of an internal borrowing by the City in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 7, and is a limited obligation
payable solely from Available Tax Increment pledged to the payment hereof under this
resolution. The Interfund Loan and the interest hereon shall not be deemed to constitute a
general obligation of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof, including,
without limitation, the City. Neither the State of Minnesota, nor any political subdivision thereof
shall be obligated to pay the principal of or interest on the Interfund Loan or other costs incident
hereto except out of Available Tax Increment, and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing
power of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of
the principal of or interest on the Interfund Loan or other costs incident hereto. The City shall
have no obligation to pay any principal amount of the Interfund Loan or accrued interest thereon,
which may remain unpaid after the final Payment Date.
(f) The City may amend the terms of the Interfund Loan at any time by resolution of
the City Council, including a determination to forgive the outstanding principal amount and
accrued interest to the extent permissible under law.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon the date of its approval.
Adopted this 22nd day of July, 2013.
__________________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
City M anager
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 1
Packet Page Number 151 of 275
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Terri Heaton, Vice-President
Tom Denaway, Analyst
DATE: July 17, 2013
SUBJECT: Overview of Proposed 3M TIF District
Introduction
The City and 3M have been working on the adoption of special legislation granting the City the authority to create a
3M Renovation and Retention Project Area. The special legislation was recently adopted by the Legislature and
signed into law by the Governor. Now that the special legislation has been adopted the City and 3M have begun the
process of creating a TIF District to assist with the development of the company’s new Research and Development
(R&D) facility. A TIF plan for the new District is currently being drafted, along with a draft development agreement.
The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the special legislation, detail the terms of the current R&D TIF District,
and outline the revenue projections for the District.
Special Legislation
The City and 3M worked together to receive special legislation from the State to create one or more TIF Districts
within the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area. The boundaries of the Project Area are the current 3M
campus parcel and adjoining right of way. TIF Districts created within this project area will be 25-year redevelopment
TIF Districts, which will be exempt from the standard blight finding as provided by the legislation. The legislation
provides the authority to create one or more TIF Districts within the project area until December 31, 2018.
The legislation requires that 100% of the tax increment generated by the new TIF Districts be spent within the
boundaries of the Project Area. As a result of the legislation not requiring a finding of blight, the legislation exempts
the Districts from the requirement that 90% of TIF revenues be used for the remediation of costs leading to the
finding of blight. Additionally, the legislation granted an extension of the 5-year rule to a period of 10-years, allowing
the City to enter into new obligations within the TIF Districts for a period of 10-years following certification of the
Districts.
Springsted Incorporated
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2887
Tel: 651-223-3000
Fax: 651-223-3002
www.springsted.com
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 152 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 2
The current 3M campus, and the corresponding Project Area, consists of a single parcel number 362922240002. In
order to avoid freezing the entire 3M campus as the base value of a TIF District, any new TIF District generated
within the project area will consist of new parcels subdivided from the current single campus parcel. This will allow
the main 3M campus to remain outside of a TIF District and for its value to fluctuate based on current market
conditions.
TIF District 1-12 3M Research and Development Project – Development Agreement Terms
Now that the special legislation has been approved by the Legislature, the City is in the process of creating TIF
District 1-12 to assist 3M with the development of the new R&D Lab Facility. A proposed TIF Plan and Development
Agreement have been prepared and are enclosed for Council review. Outlined below are the points on which the
Development Agreement has been negotiated regards to the terms of the proposed TIF District 1-12:
Capture of TIF Revenue from Fiscal Disparity: When a TIF District is created an election can be made by the City to
capture the incremental value growth generated by the Fiscal Disparity portion of the tax capacity of a parcel. The
City can elect to capture this portion of tax capacity as TIF, and make the contribution to the Fiscal Disparity pool
from outside of the TIF District. The election to make the contribution from outside of the TIF District results in
greater TIF revenue, and potentially has a modest impact on the general taxable market value on which the general
fund levy is spread. Conversely, the City may elect to make the contribution from inside of the TIF District, which
results in lower TIF revenue with no potential impact on the levy. During the life of a TIF District the City has the
ability to change the election one time, and only in circumstances where the election is going from outside of the
District to inside the District.
The proposed Development Agreement allows for the contribution to be made outside of the District, on the
contingency that 3M continue to invest in its campus. If by December 31, 2021, the company has not obtained one
or more building permits with a total minimum cost of not less than $50,000,000 (not including the R&D Building and
routine maintenance), the City will change the fiscal disparity election to be made from within the TIF District. This
term in the draft Agreement ties the generation of additional TIF revenue from the Fiscal Disparity portion to
additional investment in the campus by the company.
City Pooling Percentage: The proposed Agreement allows for the City to capture 20% of the tax increment generated
for either eligible expenditures within the project area, or administrative purposes. The City intends to use a portion
of this revenue to fund approximately $1.0M of City initiated TIF eligible site work and infrastructure improvements on
property located within the Project Area. Additional TIF eligible improvements may be funded in the future from
captured TIF funds as they are available. The net present value of the future revenue stream is $2,379,619.
Pay-As-You-Go Note: The draft Agreement contemplates the City entering issuing a pay-as-you-go note to the
company in a principal amount of $9,568,000. The note will be repaid over the life of the District at an annual non-
compounding interest rate of 5%; the note will be repaid solely by 80% of the Tax Increment generated by the
District. The principal amount of the note is based on the TIF revenue projections outlined below.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 153 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 3
Development Fees: While not detailed in the proposed Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement, the City
has also negotiated with the company that all building and planning permit fees will be paid for the facility, including a
park dedication fee of $285,000.
TIF District 1-12 Development Assumptions
The assumptions outlined below were used in the creation of the TIF revenue projections for the proposed TIF
District 1-12. The revenue assumptions are based on development terms outlined above and base assumptions
regarding timing and value provided by the company.
R&D Building Build-Out:
Value Constructed 2013: $6,000,000
Value Constructed 2014: $6,000,000
Value Constructed 2015: $12,720,000
Total Value Constructed: $24,720,000
Inflation: These revenue projections are a based on a 2% inflation assumption.
Base Value: The proposed R&D facility is to be developed on a parcel that is currently undefined, as it is in the
process of being subdivided out of the single campus parcel. As a result the base value of the R&D parcel is
unknown, and therefore the revenue projections are based on the market value generated by the R&D building only
and the revenue projections are not assuming a base frozen value. The increment is projected based only on the
capture of the increased market value resulting from the proposed vertical construction. For estimation purposes we
have assumed a pro-rata share of the existing campus market value will be applied to the newly created parcel. The
base value of the parcel is estimated at $8,155,288.
Fiscal Disparity Sharing Factor: Fiscal Disparity Contribution will be made from outside of the TIF District, resulting in
greater TIF revenue.
TIF Eligible Tax Rate Pay 2013:
City: 48.659%
County: 65.240%
School District: 32.552%
Miscellaneous: 11.520%
Total Tax Rate: 157.972%
City Admin and Pooling Percentage: - We have assumed a total City retainage of 20% for pooling and administrative
purposes.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 154 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 4
TIF 1-12 Pay-As-You-Go Note Amount and City Funding Capacity
We have estimated the maximum funding capacity of the City retaining 20% of the increment for the full 26-year term
of the TIF district based on a net present value interest rate of 5%.
Additionally, we have calculated a pay-as-you-go note report illustrating the potential principal amount and repayment
schedule of a pay-go note to 3M. This note is based on 80% of the annual increment being available during the 26-
year term of the District; with first receipt projected for Pay2015 and final receipt projected for Pay2040. The interest
on the note is to be accrued at a non-compounding annual rate of 5%.
.
Scenario 26-Year Term
Projected Built-Out: R&D Building Only
Fiscal Disparity Contrib. From Outside District
Percentage of Revenues available for City 20%
Gross revenue of City Retainage $4,918,342
NPV of City Retainage
(5% Interest) $2,379,619
3M Percentage 80%
Gross revenue of 3M retainage $19,673,354
Pay-Go Principal Amount (5% Interest Rate) $9,568,000
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 155 of 275
City of Maplewood July 17, 2013 Page 5 City of Maplewood, MinnesotaTax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12Proposed 3M Redevelopment ProjectR&D Facility Less: Less: Retained Times:Less:TotalAnnualAnnual Incremental Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Subtotal City PoolingNetPeriod Market Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Net Tax RetainageRevenueEnding Value Capacity Capacity 0.0000% Capacity Rate Increment 0.360% Increment20.00% 80%(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14)12/31/15 6,000,000 283,106 163,106 0 120,000 157.971% 189,565 682 188,883 37,777151,10612/31/16 12,120,000 405,506 163,106 0 242,400 157.971% 382,922 1,379 381,543 76,309305,23412/31/17 25,082,400 664,754 163,106 0 501,648 157.971% 792,458 2,853 789,605 157,921631,68412/31/18 25,584,048 674,787 163,106 0 511,681 157.971% 808,308 2,910 805,398 161,080644,31812/31/19 26,095,729 685,020 163,106 0 521,915 157.971% 824,474 2,968 821,506 164,301657,20512/31/20 26,617,644 695,459 163,106 0 532,353 157.971% 840,963 3,027 837,936 167,587670,34912/31/21 27,149,996 706,106 163,106 0 543,000 157.971% 857,782 3,088 854,694 170,939683,75512/31/22 27,692,996 716,966 163,106 0 553,860 157.971% 874,938 3,150 871,788 174,358697,43012/31/23 28,246,856 728,043 163,106 0 564,937 157.971% 892,437 3,213 889,224 177,845711,37912/31/24 28,811,793 739,342 163,106 0 576,236 157.971% 910,286 3,277 907,009 181,402725,60712/31/25 29,388,029 750,866 163,106 0 587,761 157.971% 928,491 3,343 925,148 185,030740,11812/31/26 29,975,790 762,622 163,106 0 599,516 157.971% 947,061 3,409 943,652 188,730754,92212/31/27 30,575,306 774,612 163,106 0 611,506 157.971% 966,002 3,478 962,524 192,505770,01912/31/28 31,186,812 786,842 163,106 0 623,736 157.971% 985,322 3,547 981,775 196,355785,42012/31/29 31,810,548 799,317 163,106 0 636,211 157.971% 1,005,029 3,618 1,001,411 200,282801,12912/31/30 32,446,759 812,041 163,106 0 648,935 157.971% 1,025,129 3,690 1,021,439 204,288817,15112/31/31 33,095,694 825,020 163,106 0 661,914 157.971% 1,045,632 3,764 1,041,868 208,374833,49412/31/32 33,757,608 838,258 163,106 0 675,152 157.971% 1,066,545 3,840 1,062,705 212,541850,16412/31/33 34,432,760 851,761 163,106 0 688,655 157.971% 1,087,876 3,916 1,083,960 216,792867,16812/31/34 35,121,415 865,534 163,106 0 702,428 157.971% 1,109,633 3,995 1,105,638 221,128884,51012/31/35 35,823,844 879,583 163,106 0 716,477 157.971% 1,131,826 4,075 1,127,751 225,550902,20112/31/36 36,540,321 893,912 163,106 0 730,806 157.971% 1,154,462 4,156 1,150,306 230,061920,24512/31/37 37,271,127 908,528 163,106 0 745,423 157.971% 1,177,551 4,239 1,173,312 234,662938,65012/31/38 38,016,550 923,437 163,106 0 760,331 157.971% 1,201,102 4,324 1,196,778 239,356957,42212/31/39 38,776,880 938,643 163,106 0 775,538 157.971% 1,225,125 4,410 1,220,715 244,143976,57212/31/40 39,552,418 954,154 163,106 0 791,048 157.971% 1,249,627 4,499 1,245,128 249,026996,102$24,680,546 $88,850 $24,591,696 $4,918,342$19,673,354NPV: $2,379,619Agenda Item H1 Attachment 2Packet Page Number 156 of 275
City of Maplewood
July 17, 2013
Page 6
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Only - Full Term - FD Outside - 80% Captured
Note Date:06/30/13
Note Rate:5.00%
Amount:$9,568,000
Cumulative Unpaid Semi-Annual Loan
Interest Accrued Net Balance
Date Principal Interest P & I Due Interest Revenue Outstanding
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
9,568,000.00
08/01/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,195.56 41,195.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 280,395.56 280,395.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 519,595.56 519,595.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/15 0.00 0.00 0.00 758,795.56 758,795.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/15 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 997,995.56 922,442.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/16 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 1,161,642.56 1,086,089.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/16 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,325,289.56 1,172,672.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/17 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,411,872.56 1,259,255.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/17 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,498,455.56 1,182,613.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/18 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,421,813.56 1,105,971.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/18 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,345,171.56 1,023,012.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/19 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,262,212.56 940,053.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/19 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,179,253.56 850,651.06 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/20 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,089,851.06 761,248.56 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/20 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 1,000,448.56 665,274.06 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/21 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 904,474.06 569,299.56 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/21 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 808,499.56 466,622.06 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/22 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 705,822.06 363,944.56 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/22 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 603,144.56 254,429.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/23 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 493,629.56 144,914.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/23 0.00 355,689.50 355,689.50 384,114.56 28,425.06 355,689.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/24 88,064.44 267,625.06 355,689.50 267,625.06 0.00 355,689.50 9,479,935.56
08/01/24 125,805.11 236,998.39 362,803.50 236,998.39 0.00 362,803.50 9,354,130.45
02/01/25 128,950.24 233,853.26 362,803.50 233,853.26 0.00 362,803.50 9,225,180.21
08/01/25 139,429.49 230,629.51 370,059.00 230,629.51 0.00 370,059.00 9,085,750.72
02/01/26 142,915.23 227,143.77 370,059.00 227,143.77 0.00 370,059.00 8,942,835.49
08/01/26 153,890.11 223,570.89 377,461.00 223,570.89 0.00 377,461.00 8,788,945.38
02/01/27 157,737.37 219,723.63 377,461.00 219,723.63 0.00 377,461.00 8,631,208.01
08/01/27 169,229.30 215,780.20 385,009.50 215,780.20 0.00 385,009.50 8,461,978.71
02/01/28 173,460.03 211,549.47 385,009.50 211,549.47 0.00 385,009.50 8,288,518.68
08/01/28 185,497.03 207,212.97 392,710.00 207,212.97 0.00 392,710.00 8,103,021.65
02/01/29 190,134.46 202,575.54 392,710.00 202,575.54 0.00 392,710.00 7,912,887.19
08/01/29 202,742.32 197,822.18 400,564.50 197,822.18 0.00 400,564.50 7,710,144.87
02/01/30 207,810.88 192,753.62 400,564.50 192,753.62 0.00 400,564.50 7,502,333.99
08/01/30 221,017.15 187,558.35 408,575.50 187,558.35 0.00 408,575.50 7,281,316.84
02/01/31 226,542.58 182,032.92 408,575.50 182,032.92 0.00 408,575.50 7,054,774.26
08/01/31 240,377.64 176,369.36 416,747.00 176,369.36 0.00 416,747.00 6,814,396.62
02/01/32 246,387.08 170,359.92 416,747.00 170,359.92 0.00 416,747.00 6,568,009.54
08/01/32 260,881.76 164,200.24 425,082.00 164,200.24 0.00 425,082.00 6,307,127.78
02/01/33 267,403.81 157,678.19 425,082.00 157,678.19 0.00 425,082.00 6,039,723.97
08/01/33 282,590.90 150,993.10 433,584.00 150,993.10 0.00 433,584.00 5,757,133.07
02/01/34 289,655.67 143,928.33 433,584.00 143,928.33 0.00 433,584.00 5,467,477.40
08/01/34 305,568.06 136,686.94 442,255.00 136,686.94 0.00 442,255.00 5,161,909.34
02/01/35 313,207.27 129,047.73 442,255.00 129,047.73 0.00 442,255.00 4,848,702.07
08/01/35 329,882.95 121,217.55 451,100.50 121,217.55 0.00 451,100.50 4,518,819.12
02/01/36 338,130.02 112,970.48 451,100.50 112,970.48 0.00 451,100.50 4,180,689.10
08/01/36 355,605.27 104,517.23 460,122.50 104,517.23 0.00 460,122.50 3,825,083.83
02/01/37 364,495.40 95,627.10 460,122.50 95,627.10 0.00 460,122.50 3,460,588.43
08/01/37 382,810.29 86,514.71 469,325.00 86,514.71 0.00 469,325.00 3,077,778.14
02/01/38 392,380.55 76,944.45 469,325.00 76,944.45 0.00 469,325.00 2,685,397.59
08/01/38 411,576.06 67,134.94 478,711.00 67,134.94 0.00 478,711.00 2,273,821.53
02/01/39 421,865.46 56,845.54 478,711.00 56,845.54 0.00 478,711.00 1,851,956.07
08/01/39 441,987.10 46,298.90 488,286.00 46,298.90 0.00 488,286.00 1,409,968.97
02/01/40 453,036.78 35,249.22 488,286.00 35,249.22 0.00 488,286.00 956,932.19
08/01/40 474,127.70 23,923.30 498,051.00 23,923.30 0.00 498,051.00 482,804.49
02/01/41 482,804.49 12,070.11 494,874.60 12,070.11 0.00 494,874.60 0.00
$9,568,000 $10,102,177.60 $19,670,177.60 $24,499,080.36 $14,396,902.76 $19,670,177.60
Surplus Tax Increment 3,176.40
Total Net Revenue $19,673,354.00
Projected Pay-As-You-Go Note Report
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 2
Packet Page Number 157 of 275
Maplewood, Minnesota
Draft Tax Increment Financing Plan
for
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment)
District No. 1-12
Within Development District No. 1
(3M Research and Development Project)
Dated: July 16, 2013
Prepared by:
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, MN 55101-2887
(651) 223-3000
WWW.SPRINGSTED.COM
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 158 of 275
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page(s)
A. Definitions .............................................................................................................................................................. 1
B. Statutory Authorization .......................................................................................................................................... 1
C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose ................................................................................................................ 1
D. Statement of Objectives ........................................................................................................................................ 1
E. 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area .......................................................................................................... 1
F. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District ..................................................... 2
G. Duration of the TIF District .................................................................................................................................... 2
H. Property to be Included in the TIF District ............................................................................................................. 2
I. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District ............................................................................................................ 2
J. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District .......................................................................... 3
K. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing .................................................................................................. 3
L. Estimated Public Costs ......................................................................................................................................... 4
M. Estimated Sources of Revenue ............................................................................................................................. 5
N. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness ......................................................................................................... 5
O. Original Net Tax Capacity ..................................................................................................................................... 5
P. Original Local Tax Rate ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Q. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment .................................................... 6
R. Use of Tax Increment ............................................................................................................................................ 7
S. Excess Tax Increment ........................................................................................................................................... 7
T. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule ..................................................................................................... 8
U. Limitation on Administrative Expenses.................................................................................................................. 8
V. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - Four Year Rule ................................................................ 9
W. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ................................................................................................... 9
X. Prior Planned Improvements ............................................................................................................................... 10
Y. Development Agreements ................................................................................................................................... 10
Z. Assessment Agreements .................................................................................................................................... 10
AA. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan............................................................................................. 10
AB. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan ........................................................................................... 11
AC. Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements.................................................................... 11
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District within Development District No. 1..................................... EXHIBIT I
Map of the Tax Increment Financing District within 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area .......... EXHIBIT II
Assumptions Report .............................................................................................................................. EXHIBIT III
Projected Tax Increment Report ...........................................................................................................EXHIBIT IV
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report ........................................................................EXHIBIT V
Market Value Analysis Report ...............................................................................................................EXHIBIT VI
Pay-As-You-Go Note Report ................................................................................................................EXHIBIT VII
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 159 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 1
Section A Definitions
The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used
indicates a different meaning:
"City" means the City of Maplewood, Minnesota; also referred to as a "Municipality".
"City Council" means the City Council of the City; also referred to as the ‘Governing Body”.
"County" means Ramsey County, Minnesota.
"Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the corresponding
Development Program.
"Development District Area" means the geographic area of the Development District.
"Development Program" means the Development Program for the Development District.
“Project Area” means the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of parcel 36.29.22.24.0002.
"School District" means Independent School District No. 622, Minnesota.
“Special Law” means Minnesota Laws, 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, both inclusive.
"TIF District" means Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12.
"TIF Plan" means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District (this document).
Section B Statutory Authorization
See Section 1.3 of the Development Program for the Development District.
Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose
See Section 1.4 of the Development Program for the Development District.
Section D Statement of Objectives
See Section 1.5 of the Development Program for the Development District.
Section E 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area
Under the Special Law the City of Maplewood may create one or more tax increment districts within the Project
Area.
With the adoption of this TIF District, the City elects to create a new tax increment district on a newly platted parcel
comprising a portion of the Project Area.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 160 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 2
Section F Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a
Redevelopment District
As provided by the Special Law the requirements for qualifying redevelopment tax increment districts under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, do not apply to the parcel, which is deemed eligible for
inclusion in a redevelopment tax increment district.
The proposed TIF District is eligible as a redevelopment district by virtue of being located on a newly platte d parcel
within the boundaries of the Project Area as defined in Section E.
Under the Special Law the 90 percent rule under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subdivision 4j, does not
apply to the Project Area.
Section G Duration of the TIF District
Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment. The
City anticipates that the TIF District will remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law (projected to be
though the year 2040). Modification of this plan (see Section AA) shall not extend these limitations. All tax
increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the City. Pursuant to MN
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 1(b), the City elects to delay receipt of first increment until 2015.
Section H Property to be Included in the TIF District
The TIF District is an approximate 28.54-acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the
location of the TIF District within the Project Area is shown in Exhibit II. The boundaries and area encompassed by
the TIF District are described below:
Parcel Number Legal Description
36.29.22.24.0002* **The west 650.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the
north 985.00 feet of the east 395.00 feet of the west 1045.00 feet of the Southwest
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter all in Section 36, Township 29 North, Range 22
West, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
The area encompassed by the TIF District shall also include all street or utility right-of-ways located upon or adjacent
to the property described above.
*The parcel to be located in the TIF District is being replatted. The Parcel Number is representative of the parcel
prior to the replatting.
**The legal description provided for the TIF District is representative of the TIF District parcel following the replatting
of the property.
Section I Property to be Acquired in the TIF District
The City may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District; however, the City does not
anticipate acquiring any such property at this time.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 161 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 3
Section J Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District
The proposed project includes the development of a 400,000 square foot research and development facility (the
“R&D Facility”) within the Project Area. The development will also include corresponding site work, infrastructure,
and parking improvements associated with R&D Facility.
The City anticipates using tax increment to reimburse 3M for a portion of the TIF eligible project costs occurred in the
development of the R&D Facility. Included in the projected eligible costs to be reimbursed are costs associated with
demolition of existing buildings, relocation of employees within buildings, site work, footings & foundations, private
utility improvements, and other eligible improvements associated with the facility. Additionally, the City anticipates
using tax increment to finance public improvements and site work on property located within the Project Area, along
with related administrative expenses.
Construction of the R&D Facility is expected to begin in 2013, and be completed by 2015. The R&D Facility is
projected to be 100% assessed and on the tax rolls as of January 2, 2016 for taxes payable in 2017.
At the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contacts with regards to the above
described development.
Under the Special Law the expenditures outside district rule under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763,
subdivision 2, does not apply; and tax increments can only be spent within the Project Area. Therefore costs eligible
for TIF reimbursement may be incurred outside of the TIF District, but must be within the boundaries of the Project
Area.
Section K Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing
In establishing the TIF District, the City makes the following findings:
(1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district;
See Section F of this document for the reasons and facts supporting this finding.
(2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased
market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from
the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for
the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan.
Factual basis:
Proposed development not expected to occur:
The development includes the construction of the R&D Facility. A key component to the development is the
reimbursement of eligible expenses through tax increments. The company has indicated they would not
undertake the proposed development without the financial assistance. Without the assistance the City has no
reason to expect that significant reinvestment in the campus would occur without assistance similar to that
provided in this plan. Therefore the City has no reason to believe the development would occur but-for the use
of tax increment assistance.
To summarize the basis for the City’s findings regarding alternative market value, in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 3(d), the City makes the following determinations:
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 162 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 4
a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without
the use of tax increment financing is anywhere from $0 (except for a small amount for annual
appreciation of land value)
b. If the proposed development to be assisted with tax increment occurs in the District, the total
increase in market value would be approximately $24,720,000, including the value of the building
(See Exhibit II). Prior to the inclusion of a 2% market value inflator starting in 2014.
c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district
permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $11,794,711 (See Exhibit V)
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council
finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than
$12,925,289 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance.
(3) The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a
whole, for development of the Project Area by private enterprise.
Factual basis: The anticipated development of the project site is to include the construction of the R&D
Facility. The Development will result in the retention of up to 700 high-paying jobs within the City. The
development clearly meets the economic development goals of the City.
(4) The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole.
Factual basis: The City Planning Commission has determined that the development proposed in the TIF Plan
conforms to the City comprehensive plan.
(5) The City does not elect the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(b); therefore subdivision 3(a) shall apply which indicates the
original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the application
of the fiscal disparity provisions (see method (a) in Section P).
Section L Estimated Public Costs
The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax
increments of the TIF District.
Private TIF eligible improvements, including
demolition, relocation, site
improvements/preparation costs, related
infrastructure and other eligible improvements
$9,568,000
Bond/Note Interest Payments 10,102,178
Public site work/infrastructure costs and
Administrative expenses
4,921,518
Other Expenditures 0
Total $24,591,696
The City reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate
additional eligible items, so long as the total estimated public cost is not increased. The City reserves the right to
spend available tax increment outside of the TIF District boundaries but within the Project Area.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 163 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 5
Section M Estimated Sources of Revenue
Tax Increment revenue $24,591,696
Interest on invested funds 0
Bond proceeds 0
Loan proceeds 0
Grants 0
Other 0
Total $24,591,696
The City anticipates using future tax increments for reimbursement of public costs incurred from Section L. As
increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, these tax increments will be reserved by the City as
reimbursement for public costs incurred (primarily site work/infrastructure costs), either through internal funding or
general obligation or revenue debt. The City also anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed
development through the use of pay-as-you-go financing. With pay-as-you-go financing, as tax increments are
collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these tax increments will be distributed to the company as
reimbursement for eligible costs incurred related to the development of the R&D Facility.
The City reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance,
internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The City
also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs
including, but not limited to, special assessments, utility revenues, federal or state funds, and investment income.
Section N Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness
The City may consider issuing tax increment bonds to finance all or a portion of the estimated public costs, and
reserves the right to issue such bonds in an amount not to exceed $18,836,373 ($14,489,518 + 30% contingency).
Section O Original Net Tax Capacity
The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total
net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts
certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For
districts certified between July 1 and December 31, inclusive, this value is based on the current assessment year.
The parcel to be located within the TIF District is an approximately 28.54 acre area of land which is currently part of
a larger 411 acre parcel. As a result the Estimated Market Value for the land within the TIF District as of January 2,
2013 for taxes payable in 2014, is not yet known. However, for purposes of the revenue projections in this TIF Plan,
the City has assumed a pro-rata share of the land market value of the 411 acre parcel will be applied to the newly
created parcel within the TIF District. Therefore the assumed original net tax capacity of the TIF District is $163,106.
This assumes the property remains classified commercial/industrial.
Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased
as a result of:
(1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property;
(2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District;
(3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements; or
(4) changes in property classification rates.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 164 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 6
Section P Original Local Tax Rate
The County Auditor shall also certify the original local tax rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all
local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the
original net tax capacity.
In future years, the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of
(a) the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or (b) the original local tax rate of the TIF District.
At the time this document was prepared, the sum of the local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for
taxes levied in 2013 and payable in 2014, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County
Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the
tax increment generated by the TIF District, the sum of the local tax rates for taxes levied in 2012 and payable in
2013, is 157.971% as shown below.
2012/2013
Taxing Jurisdiction Local Tax Rate
City of Maplewood 48.659%
Ramsey County 65.240%
ISD # 622 32.520%
Other 11.520%
Total 157.971%
Section Q Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and
Projected Tax Increment
The City anticipates that development will be initiated in 2013, creating a total tax capacity for the TIF District No. 1-
12 of $283,106 as of January 2, 2014. The captured tax capacity as of that date is estimated to be $120,000 and
the first-year of tax increment is estimated to be $189,565 payable in 2015. The first full year of increment is
projected to be in $792,458 in taxes payable 2017. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF
District is shown in Exhibit IV.
The estimates shown in this TIF Plan assume that commercial class rates remain at 1.5% for the first $150,000 of
estimated market value and 2.0% of the market value above $150,000. The projections also assume a 2% annual
increase in market values.
Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the
extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax
capacity of the TIF District.
For communities affected by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F and Chapter 276A,
the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall be determined before the application of fiscal disparity. In
subsequent years, the current net tax capacity shall either (a) be determined before the application of fiscal disparity
or (b) exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District (since the original net tax capacity was
certified) times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the City elects shall remain the same for the life of
the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method (a) to method (b) above. »The
City elects method (a), or M.S. Section 469.177, Subdivision 3(a).
The County Auditor shall certify to the City the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The City may choose
to retain any or all of this amount. It is the City's intention to retain 100% of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF
District. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 165 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 7
Exhibit III gives a listing of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits
contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit IV which shows the projected tax increment generated over the
anticipated life of the TIF District.
Section R Use of Tax Increment
Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36% of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and
pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of
financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit IV shows the
projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District.
The City has determined that it will use 100% of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of
the following purposes:
(1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative
costs associated with the TIF District (see Section T);
(2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated
public costs of the TIF District;
(3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to
finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District;
(4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S.
Section 469.175, Subdivision 1a; or
(5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and
School District.
Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project
located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be
used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City.
Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a
building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or
any other local unit of government or the State or federal government, or for a commons area used as a public park,
or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction
or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes.
If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer, or other beneficiary of assistance,
to repay all or a portion of the assistance that was paid or financed with tax increments, such payments shall be
subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less
than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest
rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the
developer or beneficiary.
Section S Excess Tax Increment
In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated
public costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the City shall use the excess tax increments to:
(1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds;
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 166 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 8
(2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof;
(3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds; or
(4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City, County and
School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of
any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution.
Section T Tax Increment Pooling and the Ten Year Rule
Under the Special Law the expenditures outside district rule under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.1763 subdivision
2, does not apply; the five-year rule under Minnesota Statutes, section 469.1763, subdivision 3, is extended to ten
years; and expenditures must only be made within the Project Area.
Up to 10% of the tax increments may be spent on costs for eligible administrative expenses.
Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District or project area if such amounts are:
(1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within ten years after
certification of the district;
(2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably
expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the ten-year period or a reasonable
temporary period or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund.
(3) used to make payments or reimbursements to a third party under binding contracts for activities
performed within the TIF District, which were entered into within ten years after certification of the
district; or
(4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs (including interest) incurred within ten years
from certification of the district.
Beginning with the eleventh year following certification of the TIF District, at least 90% of the tax increments must be
used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first ten years. When outstanding
bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF
District must be decertified.
Section U Limitation on Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the City other than:
(1) amounts paid for the purchase of land;
(2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly
connected with the physical development of the real property in the project;
(3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the
project;
(4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to section 469.178; or
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 167 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 9
(5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to
finance costs described in clause (1) to (3).
Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or
economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax
increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total tax
increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or (b) 10% of the total tax increments received by the TIF District.
Section V Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements - One Year Rule
Under the Special Law if after one year from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax
increment district, no demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property has been commenced on a parcel located
within the TIF District, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel, and the original net tax capacity of
the parcel shall be excluded from the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. If 3M subsequently commences
demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that the activity has commenced,
and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of
Revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The City must submit to the County Auditor
evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District.
Section W Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Exhibit V shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net
tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City believes that
there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed
development would not have occurred without the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public
assistance. A positive impact on other taxing jurisdictions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the
development therein becomes part of the general tax base.
The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 2, are listed below.
1. The total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the TIF District is estimated to be
$24,680,546.
2. To the extent the project in the TIF District generates any public cost impacts on City-provided services
such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and the impact of any general obligation tax
increment bonds attributable to the TIF District upon the ability to issue other debt for general fund
purposes, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City, excluding that portion
captured by the TIF District.
3. The amount of tax increments over the life of the TIF District that would be attributable to School District
levies, assuming the School District’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the
same, is estimated to be $5,085,751.
4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the TIF District that would be attributable to County levies,
assuming the County’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is
estimated to be $10,192,750.
5. No additional information has been requested by the County or School District that would enable it to
determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 168 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 10
Section X Prior Planned Improvements
The City shall accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor (or notice of district enlargement), with a
listing of all properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months
immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of
the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued.
There have been no building permits issued in the last 18 months in conjunction with any of the properties within the
TIF District.
Section Y Development Agreements
If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25% of the acreage of the property to be acquired
by the City is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds (to which tax increment from the property is pledged),
then prior to such acquisition, the City must enter into an agreement for the development of the property. Such
agreement must provide recourse for the City should the development not be completed.
The City anticipates entering into an agreement for development, but does not anticipate acquiring property located
within the TIF District.
Section Z Assessment Agreements
The City may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the
developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of
the TIF District.
The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and
specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and
so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate,
shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the
office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature
termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City, County and School District.
The City does not anticipate entering into an assessment agreement, however it reserves the right to enter into an
assessment agreement for individual projects.
Section AA Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Development District or the TIF District; a determination
to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not part of the original TIF Plan, increase in the portion of
the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the City; increase in the total estimated public costs; or designation of
property to be acquired by the City shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for
approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if:
(1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and
(2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of
those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City agrees that the TIF District's
original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels
eliminated.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 169 of 275
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
SPRINGSTED Page 11
The City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF
District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date
of certification.
Section AB Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the City shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue
and the Office of the State Auditor. The City shall also request that the County Auditor certify the original net tax
capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, t he City shall
submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of
any prior planned improvements. The City shall also send the County Assessor any assessment agreement
establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the
County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement as reasonable.
The County shall distribute to the City the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax
increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity
of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other
development, inflation of property values, or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering
and implementing the TIF Plan, the following actions should occur on an annual basis:
(1) prior to July 1, the City shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred
in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely
manner.
(2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District, or for modification
of an existing TIF District, before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax
rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be
used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years.
(3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF
District. The amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following:
(a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the
original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply;
(b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction
of the TIF District;
(c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of
estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes, then the resulting
increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original
net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District.
The County Auditor shall notify the City of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District.
Section AC Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements
The City will file the TIF Plan, and any subsequent amendments thereto, with the Commissioner of Revenue and the
Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4A. The City will comply
with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivisions 5 and 6.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 170 of 275
Exhibit II
SPRINGSTED Page 12
MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-12
Within Development District No. 1
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 171 of 275
Exhibit II
SPRINGSTED Page 13
MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (REDEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT NO. 1-12
Within 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 172 of 275
Exhibit III
SPRINGSTED Page 14
Assumptions Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Type of Tax Increment Financing District Redevelopment
Maximum Duration of TIF District 25 years from 1st increment
Projected Certification Request Date 07/23/13
Decertification Date 12/31/40 (26 Years of Increment)
2012/2013
Base Estimated Market Value $8,155,288
Original Net Tax Capacity $163,106
Assessment/Collection Year
2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016
Base Estimated Market Value $8,155,288 $8,155,288 $8,155,288 $8,155,288
Estimated Increase in Value - New Construction 0 0 6,000,000 12,120,000
Total Estimated Market Value 8,155,288 8,155,288 14,155,288 20,275,288
Total Net Tax Capacity $163,106 $163,106 $283,106 $405,506
City of Maplewood 48.659%
Ramsey County 65.240%
ISD #622 32.552%
Other 11.520%
Local Tax Capacity Rate 157.971%2012/2013
Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 0.0000%
Administrative & Pooling Retainage Percent 20.00%
Bonds Note (Pay-As-You-Go)
Bonds Dated NA Note Dated 06/30/13
Bond Rate NA Note Rate 5.00%
Bond Amount NA Note Amount $9,568,000
Present Value Date & Rate 12/01/13 5.00%PV Amount $9,518,467
Notes
Projections assume no future changes to classification rates and current tax rates remain constant,
and a 2% market value inflator.
Projections are based on EMV growth of $24.72M. Constructed between 2013-2015.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 173 of 275
Exhibit IV
SPRINGSTED Page 15
Projected Tax Increment Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Less: Less: Retained Times:Less:Total Annual
Annual Incremental Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual State Aud. Subtotal City Pooling Net
Period Market Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Net Tax Retainage Revenue
Ending Value Capacity Capacity 0.0000% Capacity Rate Increment 0.360% Increment 20.00%80%
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (10) (11) (12) (13)(14)
12/31/15 6,000,000 283,106 163,106 0 120,000 157.971% 189,565 682 188,883 37,777 151,106
12/31/16 12,120,000 405,506 163,106 0 242,400 157.971% 382,922 1,379 381,543 76,309 305,234
12/31/17 25,082,400 664,754 163,106 0 501,648 157.971% 792,458 2,853 789,605 157,921 631,684
12/31/18 25,584,048 674,787 163,106 0 511,681 157.971% 808,308 2,910 805,398 161,080 644,318
12/31/19 26,095,729 685,020 163,106 0 521,915 157.971% 824,474 2,968 821,506 164,301 657,205
12/31/20 26,617,644 695,459 163,106 0 532,353 157.971% 840,963 3,027 837,936 167,587 670,349
12/31/21 27,149,996 706,106 163,106 0 543,000 157.971% 857,782 3,088 854,694 170,939 683,755
12/31/22 27,692,996 716,966 163,106 0 553,860 157.971% 874,938 3,150 871,788 174,358 697,430
12/31/23 28,246,856 728,043 163,106 0 564,937 157.971% 892,437 3,213 889,224 177,845 711,379
12/31/24 28,811,793 739,342 163,106 0 576,236 157.971% 910,286 3,277 907,009 181,402 725,607
12/31/25 29,388,029 750,866 163,106 0 587,761 157.971% 928,491 3,343 925,148 185,030 740,118
12/31/26 29,975,790 762,622 163,106 0 599,516 157.971% 947,061 3,409 943,652 188,730 754,922
12/31/27 30,575,306 774,612 163,106 0 611,506 157.971% 966,002 3,478 962,524 192,505 770,019
12/31/28 31,186,812 786,842 163,106 0 623,736 157.971% 985,322 3,547 981,775 196,355 785,420
12/31/29 31,810,548 799,317 163,106 0 636,211 157.971% 1,005,029 3,618 1,001,411 200,282 801,129
12/31/30 32,446,759 812,041 163,106 0 648,935 157.971% 1,025,129 3,690 1,021,439 204,288 817,151
12/31/31 33,095,694 825,020 163,106 0 661,914 157.971% 1,045,632 3,764 1,041,868 208,374 833,494
12/31/32 33,757,608 838,258 163,106 0 675,152 157.971% 1,066,545 3,840 1,062,705 212,541 850,164
12/31/33 34,432,760 851,761 163,106 0 688,655 157.971% 1,087,876 3,916 1,083,960 216,792 867,168
12/31/34 35,121,415 865,534 163,106 0 702,428 157.971% 1,109,633 3,995 1,105,638 221,128 884,510
12/31/35 35,823,844 879,583 163,106 0 716,477 157.971% 1,131,826 4,075 1,127,751 225,550 902,201
12/31/36 36,540,321 893,912 163,106 0 730,806 157.971% 1,154,462 4,156 1,150,306 230,061 920,245
12/31/37 37,271,127 908,528 163,106 0 745,423 157.971% 1,177,551 4,239 1,173,312 234,662 938,650
12/31/38 38,016,550 923,437 163,106 0 760,331 157.971% 1,201,102 4,324 1,196,778 239,356 957,422
12/31/39 38,776,880 938,643 163,106 0 775,538 157.971% 1,225,125 4,410 1,220,715 244,143 976,572
12/31/40 39,552,418 954,154 163,106 0 791,048 157.971% 1,249,627 4,499 1,245,128 249,026 996,102
$24,680,546 $88,850 $24,591,696 $4,918,342 $19,673,354
NPV: $2,379,619
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 174 of 275
Exhibit V
SPRINGSTED Page 16
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Without
Project or TIF District With Project and TIF District
Final Projected Hypothetical
2012/2013 2012/2013 Retained New Hypothetical Hypothetical Tax Generated
Taxable 2012/2013 Taxable Captured Taxable Adjusted Decrease In by Retained
Taxing Net Tax Local Net Tax Net Tax Net Tax Local Local Captured
Jurisdiction Capacity (1) Tax Rate Capacity (1) + Capacity = Capacity Tax Rate (*) Tax Rate (*) N.T.C. (*)
City of Maplewood 31,936,556 48.659% 31,936,556 $791,048 32,727,604 47.483% 1.176% 375,613
Ramsey County 367,782,031 65.240% 367,782,031 791,048 368,573,079 65.100% 0.140% 514,972
ISD #622 62,433,416 32.552% 62,433,416 791,048 63,224,464 32.145% 0.407% 254,280
Other (2)--- 11.520% --- 791,048 --- 11.520% --- ---
Totals 157.971%156.248% 1.723%
* Statement 1: If the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to each of
the taxing jurisdictions above, the result would be a lower local tax rate (see Hypothetical Adjusted Tax Rate above)
which would produce the same amount of taxes for each taxing jurisdiction. In such a case, the total local tax rate
would decrease by 1.723% (see Hypothetical Decrease in Local Tax Rate above). The hypothetical tax that the
Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District would generate is also shown above.
Statement 2: Since the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District is not available to the taxing jurisdictions,
then there is no impact on taxes levied or local tax rates.
(1) Taxable net tax capacity = total net tax capacity - captured TIF - fiscal disparity contribution, if applicable.
(2) The impact on these taxing jurisdictions is negligible since they represent only 7.29% of the total tax rate.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 175 of 275
Exhibit VI
SPRINGSTED
Market Value Analysis Report
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Assumptions
Present Value Date 06/30/13
P.V. Rate - Gross T.I.5.00%
Increase in EMV With TIF District $24,720,000
Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment 11,794,711
Subtotal $12,925,289
Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF 0
Difference $12,925,289
Annual Present
Gross Tax Value @
Year Increment 5.00%
1 2015 189,565 169,834
2 2016 382,922 326,728
3 2017 792,458 643,966
4 2018 808,308 625,568
5 2019 824,474 607,694
6 2020 840,963 590,331
7 2021 857,782 573,464
8 2022 874,938 557,080
9 2023 892,437 541,163
10 2024 910,286 525,702
11 2025 928,491 510,681
12 2026 947,061 496,090
13 2027 966,002 481,916
14 2028 985,322 468,147
15 2029 1,005,029 454,772
16 2030 1,025,129 441,778
17 2031 1,045,632 429,156
18 2032 1,066,545 416,895
19 2033 1,087,876 404,983
20 2034 1,109,633 393,412
21 2035 1,131,826 382,172
22 2036 1,154,462 371,253
23 2037 1,177,551 360,645
24 2038 1,201,102 350,341
25 2039 1,225,125 340,332
26 2040 1,249,627 330,608
$24,680,546 $11,794,711
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 176 of 275
Exhibit VII
SPRINGSTED
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-12
Proposed 3M Redevelopment Project
R&D Facility
Note Date: 06/30/13
Note Rate:5.00%
Amount: $9,568,000
Cumulative Unpaid Semi-Annual Loan
Interest Accrued Net Balance
Date Principal Interest P & I Due Interest Revenue Outstanding
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
9,568,000.00
08/01/13 0.00 0.00 0.00 41,195.56 41,195.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 280,395.56 280,395.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/14 0.00 0.00 0.00 519,595.56 519,595.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/15 0.00 0.00 0.00 758,795.56 758,795.56 0.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/15 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 997,995.56 922,442.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/16 0.00 75,553.00 75,553.00 1,161,642.56 1,086,089.56 75,553.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/16 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,325,289.56 1,172,672.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/17 0.00 152,617.00 152,617.00 1,411,872.56 1,259,255.56 152,617.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/17 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,498,455.56 1,182,613.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/18 0.00 315,842.00 315,842.00 1,421,813.56 1,105,971.56 315,842.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/18 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,345,171.56 1,023,012.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/19 0.00 322,159.00 322,159.00 1,262,212.56 940,053.56 322,159.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/19 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,179,253.56 850,651.06 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/20 0.00 328,602.50 328,602.50 1,089,851.06 761,248.56 328,602.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/20 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 1,000,448.56 665,274.06 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/21 0.00 335,174.50 335,174.50 904,474.06 569,299.56 335,174.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/21 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 808,499.56 466,622.06 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/22 0.00 341,877.50 341,877.50 705,822.06 363,944.56 341,877.50 9,568,000.00
08/01/22 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 603,144.56 254,429.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
02/01/23 0.00 348,715.00 348,715.00 493,629.56 144,914.56 348,715.00 9,568,000.00
08/01/23 0.00 355,689.50 355,689.50 384,114.56 28,425.06 355,689.50 9,568,000.00
02/01/24 88,064.44 267,625.06 355,689.50 267,625.06 0.00 355,689.50 9,479,935.56
08/01/24 125,805.11 236,998.39 362,803.50 236,998.39 0.00 362,803.50 9,354,130.45
02/01/25 128,950.24 233,853.26 362,803.50 233,853.26 0.00 362,803.50 9,225,180.21
08/01/25 139,429.49 230,629.51 370,059.00 230,629.51 0.00 370,059.00 9,085,750.72
02/01/26 142,915.23 227,143.77 370,059.00 227,143.77 0.00 370,059.00 8,942,835.49
08/01/26 153,890.11 223,570.89 377,461.00 223,570.89 0.00 377,461.00 8,788,945.38
02/01/27 157,737.37 219,723.63 377,461.00 219,723.63 0.00 377,461.00 8,631,208.01
08/01/27 169,229.30 215,780.20 385,009.50 215,780.20 0.00 385,009.50 8,461,978.71
02/01/28 173,460.03 211,549.47 385,009.50 211,549.47 0.00 385,009.50 8,288,518.68
08/01/28 185,497.03 207,212.97 392,710.00 207,212.97 0.00 392,710.00 8,103,021.65
02/01/29 190,134.46 202,575.54 392,710.00 202,575.54 0.00 392,710.00 7,912,887.19
08/01/29 202,742.32 197,822.18 400,564.50 197,822.18 0.00 400,564.50 7,710,144.87
02/01/30 207,810.88 192,753.62 400,564.50 192,753.62 0.00 400,564.50 7,502,333.99
08/01/30 221,017.15 187,558.35 408,575.50 187,558.35 0.00 408,575.50 7,281,316.84
02/01/31 226,542.58 182,032.92 408,575.50 182,032.92 0.00 408,575.50 7,054,774.26
08/01/31 240,377.64 176,369.36 416,747.00 176,369.36 0.00 416,747.00 6,814,396.62
02/01/32 246,387.08 170,359.92 416,747.00 170,359.92 0.00 416,747.00 6,568,009.54
08/01/32 260,881.76 164,200.24 425,082.00 164,200.24 0.00 425,082.00 6,307,127.78
02/01/33 267,403.81 157,678.19 425,082.00 157,678.19 0.00 425,082.00 6,039,723.97
08/01/33 282,590.90 150,993.10 433,584.00 150,993.10 0.00 433,584.00 5,757,133.07
02/01/34 289,655.67 143,928.33 433,584.00 143,928.33 0.00 433,584.00 5,467,477.40
08/01/34 305,568.06 136,686.94 442,255.00 136,686.94 0.00 442,255.00 5,161,909.34
02/01/35 313,207.27 129,047.73 442,255.00 129,047.73 0.00 442,255.00 4,848,702.07
08/01/35 329,882.95 121,217.55 451,100.50 121,217.55 0.00 451,100.50 4,518,819.12
02/01/36 338,130.02 112,970.48 451,100.50 112,970.48 0.00 451,100.50 4,180,689.10
08/01/36 355,605.27 104,517.23 460,122.50 104,517.23 0.00 460,122.50 3,825,083.83
02/01/37 364,495.40 95,627.10 460,122.50 95,627.10 0.00 460,122.50 3,460,588.43
08/01/37 382,810.29 86,514.71 469,325.00 86,514.71 0.00 469,325.00 3,077,778.14
02/01/38 392,380.55 76,944.45 469,325.00 76,944.45 0.00 469,325.00 2,685,397.59
08/01/38 411,576.06 67,134.94 478,711.00 67,134.94 0.00 478,711.00 2,273,821.53
02/01/39 421,865.46 56,845.54 478,711.00 56,845.54 0.00 478,711.00 1,851,956.07
08/01/39 441,987.10 46,298.90 488,286.00 46,298.90 0.00 488,286.00 1,409,968.97
02/01/40 453,036.78 35,249.22 488,286.00 35,249.22 0.00 488,286.00 956,932.19
08/01/40 474,127.70 23,923.30 498,051.00 23,923.30 0.00 498,051.00 482,804.49
02/01/41 482,804.49 12,070.11 494,874.60 12,070.11 0.00 494,874.60 0.00
$9,568,000 $10,102,177.60 $19,670,177.60 $24,499,080.36 $14,396,902.76 $19,670,177.60
Surplus Tax Increment 3,176.40
Total Net Revenue $19,673,354.00
Projected Pay-As-You-Go Note Report
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 3
Packet Page Number 177 of 275
5536499v1
MODIFICATION TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
Draft: July 22, 2013
This document was drafted by: BRIGGS AND MORGAN,
Professional Association
2200 West First National Bank Building
332 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Financial Information Springsted Incorporated
provided by: 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 178 of 275
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
i
SECTION I DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
NO. 1 ................................................................................................................ 3
1.1. Definitions.............................................................................................................. 3
1.2. Statement of Public Purpose .................................................................................. 4
1.3. Statutory Authority ................................................................................................ 5
1.4. Statement of Need .................................................................................................. 6
1.5. Statement of Objectives ......................................................................................... 6
1.6. Boundaries of Development District ..................................................................... 7
1.7. Development Activities ......................................................................................... 7
1.8. Payment of Project Cost......................................................................................... 9
1.9. Environmental Controls ......................................................................................... 9
1.10. Park and Open Space to be Created ....................................................................... 9
1.11. Proposed Reuse of Property ................................................................................. 10
1.12. Administration and Maintenance of Development District ................................. 10
1.13. Rehabilitation ....................................................................................................... 10
1.14. Relocation ............................................................................................................ 10
1.15. Parcels To Be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development
District.................................................................................................................. 10
1.16. Amendments ........................................................................................................ 11
1.17. Development Activity in the Development District for which Contracts
Have Been Signed ................................................................................................ 11
1.18. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within The Development
District.................................................................................................................. 12
Exhibit A Boundaries of Development District No. 1 .................................................. A-1
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 179 of 275
5536499v1
MUNICIPAL ACTION TAKEN
Based upon the statutory authority described in the Modified Development Program
attached hereto, the public purpose findings by the City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling
the City's development objectives as set forth in the Modified Development Program, the City
Council has created, established and designated Development District No. 1 pursuant to and in
accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.126.
The following municipal action was taken in connection therewith:
October 28, 1985: The Program for Development District No. 1 was adopted by the City
Council.
June 23, 1986: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
September 28, 1987: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
enlargement of the geographic Project Area and increased Project Costs.
January 11, 1988: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
May 8, 1989: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
October 9, 1989: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
April 23, 1990: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
December 23, 1991: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
February 10, 1992: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
modifying the Project Costs.
May 24, 1993: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
May 8, 1995: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by modifying
the Project Costs.
June 28, 1999: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
enlargement of the geographic Project Area and increased Project Costs.
August 13, 2001: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
increased Project Costs.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 180 of 275
5536499v1
2
May 12, 2003: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs.
June 23, 2003: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-8 within
Development District No. 1 was adopted.
August 25, 2008: The Program for Development District No. 1 was modified by
increased Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-9
within Development District No. 1 was adopted.
August 9, 2010: The program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Housing District No. 1-10 within
Development District No. 1 was adopted.
April 25, 2011: The program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District No. 1-
11 within Development District No. 1 was adopted.
July 22, 2013: The program for Development District No. 1 was modified by increased
Project Costs and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment District No. 1-12 within
Development District No. 1 was adopted.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 181 of 275
5536499v1
3
SECTION I
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
1.1. Definitions. The terms defined below have, for purposes of this Development
Program, the meanings herein specified, unless the context specifically requires otherwise:
"City" means the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and political subdivision
of the State of Minnesota. The City has a Statutory City Plan A form of government.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan submitted to the
Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 473.173, which contains the objectives,
policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development,
redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City.
"Council" means the City Council of the City, also referred to as the governing body.
(See "Governing Body" below.)
"County" means the County of Ramsey, Minnesota.
"Development District Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended and supplemented.
"Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is created
and established hereto pursuant to and in accordance with the Development District Act, and is
geographically described in Exhibit A.
"Development Program" means this Development Program for Development District No.
1, initially adopted by the Council on October 28, 1985 and modified on June 23, 1986,
September 28, 1987, January 11, 1988, May 8, 1989, October 9, 1989, April 23, 1990, December
23, 1991, February 10, 1992, May 24, 1993, May 8, 1995, June 28, 1999, August 13, 2001, May
12, 2003, June 23, 2003, August 25, 2008, August 9, 2010, April 25, 2011, and July 22, 2013.
As defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.125, Subd. 3, a development program is a
statement of objectives of the City for improvement of a development district which contains a
complete statement as to the public facilities to be constructed within the district, the open space
to be created, the environmental controls to be applied, the proposed reuse of private property
and the proposed operations of the district after the capital improvements within the district have
been completed.
"Economic Development District" means a type of tax increment financing district which
consists of any project, or portions of a project, not meeting the requirements found in the
definition of redevelopment district, renewal and renovation district, soils condition district,
mined underground space development district, or housing district, but which the City finds to be
in the public interest because:
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 182 of 275
5536499v1
4
(a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations
to another municipality; or
(b) It will result in increased employment in the state; or
(c) It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the state.
"Governing Body" means the duly elected City Council as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.125, Subd. 8.
"Housing District" means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a
project, or a portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low
and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1937,
as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future
federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts, as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 11.
"Municipal Industrial Development Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended.
"Municipality" means any city, however organized as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.125, Subd. 2.
"3M Renovation and Retention Project Area" means the land identified as Parcel
362922240002.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds
issued and to be issued by the City to finance the project costs associated with Development
District No. 1 as stated in the Development Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
the Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1. The term "Tax
Increment Bonds" shall also include any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds.
"Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently
established or to be established in the future in Development District No. 1.
"Tax Increment Financing Act" means the statutory provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, inclusive, as amended.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the respective Tax Increment Financing Plan for
each Tax Increment Financing District located within the Development District.
1.2. Statement of Public Purpose. The Council (the "Council") in and for the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") has determined that there is a need for housing,
development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City to provide employment
opportunities, to enhance development opportunities for the private sector, to improve the tax
base and to improve the general economy of the City, the County of Ramsey and the State of
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 183 of 275
5536499v1
5
Minnesota. It is found that there are certain parcels of property within the Development District
which are potentially more useful, productive and valuable than is being realized under existing
conditions, is less productive because of the lack of proper utilization, and, therefore, are not
contributing to the tax base of the City to their full potential. In addition, it is hereby found that
there is a need for public improvements to encourage development.
Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for
improving the Development District of the City to provide impetus for private development, to
maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as
are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City.
The Council has also determined that the proposed developments would not occur solely
through private investment in the foreseeable future; that the tax increment financing plans
proposed herein are consistent with the Development Program; and that the tax increment
financing plans will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the
municipality as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Development District by
private enterprise.
The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires
active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry
and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives.
1.3. Statutory Authority. The Development District Act, authorizes the City, upon
certain public purpose findings by the Council, to establish and designate development districts
within the City and to establish, develop and administer development programs in regard thereto,
all for the purpose of creating funding for the financing of necessary activities and improvements
within the City.
In accordance with the purposes set forth in Section 469.124 of the Development District
Act, the Council hereby establishes Development District No. 1, as described in Exhibit A, for
the purposes of enhancing the environment in which existing businesses are located, thus helping
to secure their continued existence and potential additional development within the City, and
promoting new and ongoing development in Development District No. 1, both of which will
provide employment opportunities, improve the tax base of the City and contribute positively to
the economy of the State.
The Tax Increment Financing Act, provides the procedure for the establishment of tax
increment districts for the use of tax increment financing authorized by the Development District
Act for the funding of qualified public activities and improvements.
Within the Development District, the City has established ten housing districts as the
types of tax increment financing district described in Section 469.174, Subd. 11 for Housing
District No. 1-1, Housing District No. 1-2, Housing District No. 1-3, Housing District No. 1-4,
Housing District No. 1-5, Housing District No. 1-6, Housing District No. 1-7, Housing District
No. 1-8, Housing District No. 1-9, and Housing District No. 1-10. The City has established six
economic development districts as the types of tax increment financing district described in
Section 469.174, Subd. 12 for Economic Development District No. 1-1, Economic Development
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 184 of 275
5536499v1
6
District No. 1-2, Economic Development District No. 1-3, Economic Development District No.
1-4, Economic Development District No. 1-5, and Economic Development District No. 1-11, and
a redevelopment district as permitted under Minnesota Laws, 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9,
Section 21.
1.4. Statement of Need. The Development District is established by the City of
Maplewood for the purpose of promoting the redevelopment of existing commercial areas and
the development of new business opportunities within the community. The City has found that
the area within the Development District has not realized its greatest development potential due
to a variety of factors. Included in the development barriers identified by the City are:
inadequate public improvements, improper land use and utilization, and lack of investment. The
City has found that the creation of the Development District and the utilization of tax increment
financing is needed to remove these barriers and to promote development of the community.
1.5. Statement of Objectives. The Council determines that it is necessary, desirable
and in the public interest to establish the Development District in the City, pursuant to the
authority of the Development District Act. The Council finds that the creation of the
Development District is necessary to give the City the ability to meet certain public purpose
objectives that would not be otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without intervention
by the City in the normal development process.
The City intends to satisfy the following objectives through the implementation of the
Development Program:
(a) To provide safe, decent, sanitary housing for all residents of the city and in
particular low and moderate income residents.
(b) To provide an adequate housing supply for all residents at a cost they can
afford.
(c) To provide housing choices for low and moderate income residents who
find housing opportunities are not available to them because of economic conditions.
(d) To provide project activities which will assist in making possible the
construction of a planned apartment for low and moderate income residents, as well, as
improving health, welfare and convenience of citizens residing in the Development District.
(e) Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements,
including recreational and community center facilities, in the Development District, necessary
for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District and adjacent areas of the
City and the provision of adequate City services to the City residents.
(f) Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the
Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use,
in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with a minimum adverse impact
on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 185 of 275
5536499v1
7
(g) Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the
Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby
improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor
and other human resources in the City.
(h) Secure the increase of property subject to taxation by the City,
Independent School Districts Nos. 622, 623 and 624, Northwest Metropolitan Intermediate
District No. 916, Ramsey County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such
entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them.
(i) Promote the concentration of new desirable residential, commercial,
office, restaurant, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to
maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City.
(j) Encourage local business expansion, improvement and development,
whenever possible.
(k) Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District
through quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings.
(l) Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment
of existing areas and structures which are compatible with the Development Program.
1.6. Boundaries of Development District. The area within the Development District is
set forth in Exhibit A.
1.7. Development Activities. Development activities within the Development District
must be financially feasible, marketable and be compatible with long range development
strategies of the City. The following recommendations represent the options that satisfy
community development objectives for the Development District while taking advantage of
opportunities which are currently available. The City will perform all project activities pursuant
to the statute and in doing so, anticipates that the following may, but are not required to be
undertaken:
(a) The making of studies, planning, and informal activities relating to the
Development Program.
(b) The implementation and administration of the Development Program.
(c) The construction or reconstruction of streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other
public improvements including but not limited to:
(1) the construction of street, water and sewer improvements on Southlawn
Drive from Beam Avenue to County Road D;
(2) the construction of street, water and sewer improvements on McKnight
Road from Highway 36 to Conway Avenue;
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 186 of 275
5536499v1
8
(3) the construction of a water tower on Stillwater Road east of Sterling;
(4) the construction of water main on Hudson place;
(5) the installation of traffic lights at Hazelwood Avenue and Southlawn
Avenue on Beam Avenue.
(6) acquisition of land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at County
Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue;
(7) improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight
Road;
(8) acquisition, expansion and improvement of Harvest Park located at
Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36;
(9) the construction of water, street, sanitary sewer and storm sewer
improvements within an area North of Beam Avenue, South of the Northern City limit,
East of Highway 61 and West of White Bear Avenue;
(10) acquisition of the abandoned Burlington Northern railroad right of way
running from Larpenteur Street to Highway 694;
(11) acquisition of the land that the Cottages of Maplewood will be developed
on and the payment of certain site improvements for the Cottages of Maplewood project;
(12) acquisition and betterment of a city recreational and community center
facility;
(13) improvement of Sherwood Park located at Hazelwood and Cope Avenues;
(14) improvement of Afton Heights Park, Geranium Park, Gethsemane Park,
Gladstone Park, Goodrich Park, Hillside Park, Lion's Park, Maplecrest Park, Maplewood
Heights Park, Nature Center, Robinhood Park, Sherwood Park and Timber Park;
(15) construction of a municipal storage building to house park equipment;
(16) construction of public alleys east of White Bear Avenue from Woodlyn
Avenue to County Road D and a public alley southwest of the southwest corner of Beam
Avenue and White Bear Avenue;
(17) construction of traffic improvements on White Bear Avenue from
Interstate Highway 694 to Beam Avenue; and
(18) bike path along McKnight Road (County State Aid Highway 68) from a
point 788.17 feet north of the Southwest Corner of Section 36, Township 29N, Range
22W to a point 37.00 feet south of the West Quarter Corner of Section 36 Township 29N,
Range 22W.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 187 of 275
5536499v1
9
(19) the construction of an approximately 400,000 square foot research and
development facility and outdoor parking of approximately 725 spaces within the 3M
Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of parcel 362922240002;
(d) The acquisition of property consistent with the objectives of the
Development Program.
(e) The preparation of property for use including demolition of structures,
clearance of sites, placement of fill, and installation of utilities.
(f) The resale of property to developers.
(g) The provision of relocation assistance to businesses and homeowners as
may be required by this Development Program.
(h) The issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance project costs of the
Development Program or to evidence the City's obligation to reimburse developers for all or part
of the project costs of the Development Program incurred or to be incurred by it pursuant to a
Development Agreement.
(i) The use of tax increments derived from a Tax Increment Financing
District within the Development District to pay debt service on Tax Increment Bonds or
otherwise pay the project cost of the Development Program.
1.8. Payment of Project Cost. It is anticipated that the project cost of the Development
Program will be paid primarily from the tax increments to be derived from the Development
District, either directly or indirectly by payment of project eligible expenses, by reimbursement
of developers for items of project cost paid directly by developers, or by some combination of
these methods. The City reserves the right to utilize special assessments, general property taxes,
utility revenues, and other sources of revenue which the City may apply to pay the project cost.
The City intends to pool tax increments from all Tax Increment Financing Districts to finance the
project cost of the Development Program within the Development District.
1.9. Environmental Controls. The proposed Tax Increment Financing Districts within
the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal
actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner
consistent with existing environmental standards.
1.10. Park and Open Space to be Created. Park and open space within the
Development District No. 1 will be created in accordance with the zoning and platting
ordinances of the City. The City may undertake the following park improvements:
(a) the acquisition of land and improvement of Hazelwood Park located at
County Road C east of Hazelwood Avenue;
(b) the improvement of Playcrest Park located at Lydia Avenue and McKnight
Road;
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 188 of 275
5536499v1
10
(c) the acquisition, expansion and improvement of Harvest Park located at
Hazelwood Avenue south of County Road C and North of Highway 36;
(d) the improvement of Sherwood Park located at Hazelwood and Cope
Avenues;
(e) the improvement of Afton Heights Park, Geranium Park, Gethsemane
Park, Gladstone Park, Goodrich Park, Hillside Park, Lions Park, Maplecrest Park, Maplewood
Heights, Nature Center, Robinhood Park, Sherwood Park, Timber Park;
(f) the acquisition and improvement of park land adjacent to Housing District
No. 1-9, the acquisition and improvement of the park land will not involve the use of tax
increment revenues.
1.11. Proposed Reuse of Property. The Development Program does not contemplate
the acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an
economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be
considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must
clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the
acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond
and/or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be
available to repay the project cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It shall be the intent
of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions
regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale
contract to which the City is a part.
1.12. Administration and Maintenance of Development District. Maintenance and
operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the City Manager who shall
serve as administrator of the Development District.
The administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of
Section 469.131 of the Development District Act; provided, however, that such powers may only
be exercised at the direction of the Council. No action taken by the administrator pursuant to the
abovementioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Council.
1.13. Rehabilitation. Owners of properties within the Development District will be
encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable state and local codes
and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of properties who purchase property
within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties as
condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be
available from federal, state or local sources.
1.14. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of
the Development Program. The City accepts its responsibility for providing for relocation
pursuant to Section 469.133 of the Development District Act.
1.15. Parcels To Be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District.
The City intends to acquire all or part of the land within Housing District No. 1-3 to facilitate the
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 189 of 275
5536499v1
11
construction of the Cottages of Maplewood housing project. The City intends to reimburse the
developer for the cost of the land within Housing District Nos. 1-4, 1-5 and 1-6 to facilitate the
construction of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood housing project (Phase I, Phase II and
Phase III). The City intends to reimburse the developer for the cost of the land within Housing
District No. 1-7 to facilitate the construction of the Van Dyke Village project. The City intends
to reimburse the developer for the cost of the land within Housing District No. 1-8 to facilitate
the construction of the Sibley Cove project. The City intends to reimburse the developer for the
cost of the land within Housing District No. 1-9 to facilitate the construction of the Gethsemane
Senior Housing project. The City intends to reimburse the developer for the cost of land within
Housing District No. 1-10 to facilitate the construction of the Shores of Maplewood project. The
City intends to finance public improvements related to redevelopment of the Maplewood Mall
within Economic Development District No. 1-11.
1.16. Amendments. The City reserves the right to alter and amend the Development
Program and the tax increment financing plans, subject to the provisions of state law regulating
such action. The City specifically reserves the right to change the size of the Development
District and the Tax Increment Financing Districts, the project cost of the Development Program
and the amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such cost by following the
procedures specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 4.
1.17. Development Activity in the Development District for which Contracts Have
Been Signed.
(a) Zantigo Restaurant was developed by Zantigo Mexican Restaurants, Inc.
on County Road D, West of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was William Kranz
Construction and the cost of the project was $260,000.
(b) Maple Ridge Square Shopping Center was developed by Curt Johnson and
Joe Weis - Weis Builders, Inc. at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and White Bear Avenue.
The contractor was Weis Builders and the cost of the project was $2,318,383.
(c) Maple Ridge Apartments was developed by Podawiltz Development
Company on County Road D, west of White Bear Avenue. The contractor was Avon Lumber
Company, Inc. and the cost of the project was $2,800,000.
(d) Maple Ridge Estate Apartments was developed by Maple Ridge
Development Corporation at the intersection of Stillwater Road and Stillwater Avenue. The
contractor was Steve Haight Construction and the cost of the project was $3,999,000.
(e) An addition to Maplewood Mall is being developed by CPI. The
contractor is Kraus Anderson and the cost of the project is $2,075,000.
(f) A Main Street Store at Maplewood Mall is being developed by Federated
Department Stores. The contractor is Sheehy Construction and the cost of the project is
$2,000,000.
(g) The expansion of St. John's Northeast Hospital on Beam Avenue.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 190 of 275
5536499v1
12
(h) The development of a 60 unit senior citizen housing complex (known as
the Cottages of Maplewood).
(i) The development of the Crossings Mall to be located adjacent to
Maplewood Mall.
(j) The development of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood senior citizen
housing project.
(k) The acquisition of property located at 2146 White Bear Avenue,
commonly referred to as the Taystee Bread Store in an amount anticipated to be $500,000 or the
development of the Community Park in the amount of $500,000.
(l) The development of the Schroeder Milk project.
(m) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 20 unit townhome-style housing facility in the City (the Van Dyke Village
project) consisting of 8 one-story, two-bedroom and 12 two-story, three-bedroom units.
(n) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 80 unit rental housing facility in the City (the Sibley Cove project) consisting of
two- and three-bedroom units and related amenities.
(o) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 111 unit senior housing facility in the City (the Gethsemane project).
(p) A development agreement with respect to the construction of an
approximately 162 unit senior housing facility in the City (the Shores of Maplewood project).
(q) The City intends to enter into a development agreement with 3M
Company with respect to the construction of an approximately 400,000 square foot research and
development facility and outdoor parking of approximately 725 within the 3M Renovation and
Retention Project Area (the 3M Research and Development Project).
1.18. Other Specific Development Expected to Occur Within The Development
District. It is anticipated that development will occur within the Development District as
described in Section 1.17. Additional development may occur in the Development District in the
future; however, no contracts have been entered into at this time with respect to such
development. The nature and timing of further development cannot accurately be predicted at
this time.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 191 of 275
5536499v1
A-1
Exhibit A
Boundaries of Development District No. 1
Consists of the entire corporate boundaries of the City of Maplewood.
Agenda Item H1
Attachment 4
Packet Page Number 192 of 275
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Gayle Bauman, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 7:00 pm – Public Hearing on Capital Improvement Plan for 2014-2018
and the Issuance of Capital Improvement Bonds
a. Public Hearing
b. Resolution Approving 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Plan and
the Issuance of Capital Improvement Bonds (3 votes required)
DATE: July 15, 2013 for July 22, 2013 council meeting
INTRODUCTION
The Capital Improvement Plan is an annually prepared document that coordinates the
planning, financing and timing of major equipment purchases and construction projects.
It is proposed that (1) the Capital Improvement Plan be formally adopted with a
commitment to follow the construction and financing schedule in the CIP for the
proposed capital projects and (2) the approval to issue up to $4 million in Capital
Improvement Plan Bonds for the purpose of financing capital improvements related to
fire public safety facilities.
The draft CIP was presented to the Commissions and comments/recommendations
have been received from all the Commissions. Adopting the CIP does not commit the
council to the proposed projects, nor implement the assumptions made during the
preparation; however, this is the basis for the 2014 Budget as we proceed with its
preparation. Similarly, adoption of the resolution approving the issuance of Capital
Improvement Plan Bonds does not authorize work to proceed on any fire public safety
facility, but it does give authority to utilize this financing tool.
There is a fairly significant decrease in the cost of projects included in the 2014-2018
CIP compared to previous years. The proposed 2014-2018 CIP contains $46.7 million
in expenditures while the 2013-2017 CIP contained $67.7 million. The two main
reasons for this decrease are 1) the once-in-a-decade interchange improvement at
TH36-English was included in the 2013-2017 CIP at a cost of $16.2 million and it is not
included in the 2014-2018 CIP; and 2) the City’s shift in focus from an accelerated
streets program to controlling our debt levels.
Debt Analysis
Beginning in 2007, the City made a conscious decision to take advantage of the
favorable construction market and expand its street repair/reconstruction program.
Some of the outcomes of this decision are:
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 193 of 275
• Many of the badly deteriorated streets in the City were repaired and/or improved.
• Projects were completed at a lower cost than originally anticipated.
• More projects could be completed because of the lower costs.
• Our outstanding debt amount has increased.
Two of the internal policies the City has regarding debt service fund balances and debt
levies are:
1. The ratio of debt service fund levies combined with capital expenditure levies to total
levies shall be targeted to maintain a level in the range of 15-25%. This policy will
help to ensure that the city is always maintaining its infrastructure, either through use
of debt or current funding.
2. The City’s fund balance in the Debt Service fund shall be at a minimum level of 50%
of annual debt service expenditures. Because the majority of annual debt service is
paid on February 1 and August 1 of each year, funds must be on hand for payment
of February 1 debt service.
With the expansion of the streets program, the City is currently exceeding the targeted
level of 15-25% for its debt/capital levy. For 2013, the ratio of debt service fund levies
combined with capital expenditure levies to total levies was 26.7%. The proposed CIP
includes an increase in the debt/capital levy of $105,070 broken down as follows:
FUND 2013 LEVY 2014 LEVY
Debt Service 4,313,530 4,658,600
Capital Improvement Projects 180,000 180,000
Fire Truck Replacement 50,000 50,000
Park Development 30,000 30,000
Public Safety Expansion 260,000 0
Redevelopment 20,000 40,000
Economic Development Authority
89,270 89,270
TOTAL DEBT/CAPITAL LEVY 4,942,800 5,047,870
Exceeding our target in this case does not have a negative impact on the City as long
as it doesn’t continue indefinitely. The City consciously made a decision to put more
funding toward infrastructure and staff has been able to maintain its operations side.
This was accomplished by implementing many different strategies such as:
• Early retirement program
• Not filling or eliminating vacant positions
• No or minimal COLA increases
• Deferring projects and/or purchases
• Changes to health insurance
By managing our street projects through the CIP process, we currently anticipate that
there will be no bonding requirement for street projects in 2015 and debt service
requirements will begin to decrease in 2016. This will eventually bring our debt/capital
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 194 of 275
levy back in line with our internal policy. The history of the debt/capital levy to total levy
is as follows:
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
20.2% 22.0% 20.9% 21.7% 22.6% 25.8% 26.7%
Based on projections for the Debt Service funds, it appears the City will not be able to
maintain a minimum level fund balance in the debt service funds of 50% of annual debt
service expenditures for a few years starting around 2016, without a significant increase
in the debt levy. While the debt service funds will continue to have a positive total fund
balance at the end of each year, there would not be sufficient funds on hand at
February 1st and August 1st to make the required debt service payment. What this
means is that the debt service funds would temporarily borrow money from another fund
and pay interest expense on these borrowings. This would continue for a few years
until some of our bond issues are paid in full and drop off the City’s payment schedule.
Though this is not an ideal situation, staff does understand that going against the policy
in the short term is a better alternative than having a large levy increase to avoid the
drop in fund balance. Also, new legislation was passed this session which should bring
in an additional $530,000 in Local Government Aid and potentially another $75,000 -
$200,000 due to the return of the sales tax exemption for cities and counties. The City
would look at utilizing these funds to manage our debt levels in the short term. Based
on current information, the following table shows the projected year end fund balance
for the debt services funds for 2014-2018:
2014
2015 2016 2017 2018
YE Fund Balance
$6,897,820 $4,672,360 $3,201,030 $2,022,020 $1,238,100
% of debt service costs 64% 46% 32% 21% 13%
% of debt service costs w/
LGA funds ($530,000/yr) 69% 56% 49% 42% 42%
CIP Summary
A copy of the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Plan has been distributed and can be
found on the City’s website at www.ci.maplewood.mn.us. The Transmittal Letter
highlights the major projects within the Plan for consideration. The document explains
each of the proposed projects, as well as analyzes the impacts on the budget for the
various funds, along with the tax impact necessary to implement these projects as
proposed. The staff submits projects based upon goals set at the Council/Management
Team retreats. The finance staff analyzes the funds available for capital projects along
with the impacts of the staff proposals. A number of revisions are made in the project
submittals based upon the analysis of finance, as well as management priorities to
achieve the attached CIP plan. The attached table shows the changes that were made
to the original requests based on the City’s financial means and meetings with the
various department heads.
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 195 of 275
BUDGETARY CONSIDERATION
As noted above, recommendations include a debt/capital levy increase of $105,070.
The plan is to utilize either the new Local Government Aid or sales tax relief to offset
this increase, but these items will all be reviewed during the preparation of the 2014
Budget. Adoption of the CIP as presented is recommended.
INFORMATION ON CIP BOND
A CIP Bond can be issued by the Council for various types of public facility
improvements, such as City Halls, Fire Stations, Police Stations, or Public Works
Buildings. These types of CIP Bonds can be issued without a referendum if certain
conditions are followed. First, the project must be included within the Capital
Improvement Plan. Second, the Council must hold a Public Hearing on the proposed
improvement project. Third, following the Public Hearing, a petition may be filed within
30 days by at least 5% of the residents who voted in the previous election. If the
petition is filed, then a referendum needs to be held before financing can be secured in
this manner. If a petition is not filed, then the City may issue CIP Bonds.
The City recently issued CIP Bonds to finance the Police Department Expansion project
and previously issued CIP Bonds in 2004 for the construction of the Public Works
Building Addition. If issuance of these bonds is authorized, it is proposed that up to $4
million in bonds be issued to finance any funding gaps for either the construction of a
new fire station in the southern leg of the City, the rebuilding of the Hazelwood station or
the rehabbing of the Gladstone station. The authority of the bond issuance remains for
one year, or until a new CIP is adopted. If needed, authorization of the actual bond sale
will be presented to the Council for consideration either later this year or in 2014. The
action being taken tonight only authorizes the sale to occur; but does not authorize the
actual sale. The maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any year
on all the outstanding capital improvement plan bonds issued under MN Statute
475.521 will not equal or exceed 0.16% of the taxable market value of property in the
City. The expected debt service on all capital improvement bonds issued under MN
Statute 475.521, including the proposed capital improvement bonds outlined in this CIP,
is within the statutory debt limits applicable to the City.
MN Statute 475.521 outlines eight criteria that must be met prior to a city issuing bonds
under this authority. Under these criteria, the City has considered the following eight
points:
1. Condition of the City’s infrastructure and need for the project – Four out of the five
stations are over 30 years old and were built when the city was just starting to
expand in its commercial and residential growth. These projects assume the
construction of a new fire station in the southern leg of the City, rebuilding the
Hazelwood station and rehabbing the Gladstone station.
2. Demand for the improvement – In the last 10 years, the City has taken on a new
look with the addition of senior housing, more multi-family housing and is changing
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 196 of 275
the way we have to deliver the services in order to keep up with the increase in
demand and at the same time, plan for the next 30+ years.
3. Cost of the improvement – the cost of the three fire station projects is expected to be
$7,750,000 per the CIP.
4. Availability of public resources – The debt service payments on the new bonds will
be levied on property tax payers within the City. Current low interest rates in the
municipal bond market create a unique opportunity for the City to acquire and
finance needed capital infrastructure while keeping the tax levy required to pay debt
service on the general obligation CIP bonds as low as possible.
5. Level of overlapping debt – Capital Improvement Bonds currently outstanding are
Series 2004D in the amount of $485,000 and Series 2013A in the amount of
$3,385,000. Total estimated indirect debt related to the City as of 7-18-2013 is
shown below.
Indirect Debt
2012/13 Taxable Est. G.O. Debt
Debt Applicable to
Tax Capacity in City
Taxing Unit(a) Net Tax Capacity As of 7-18-13(b) Percent Amount
Ramsey County $443,648,458 $148,815,000 8.4% $12,500,460
Ramsey County Library 227,219,636 19,285,000 16.3 3,143,455
ISD #622 74,001,248 140,435,000 43.0 60,387,050
ISD #623 56,704,132 44,015,000 8.2 3,609,230
ISD #624 62,295,250 92,180,000 1.0 921,800
Metropolitan Council 2,964,890,691 17,330,000(c) 1.3 225,290
Metropolitan Transit District 2,367,824,145 327,475,000(d) 1.6 5,239,600
TOTAL $86,026,885
(a) Only those units with debt outstanding are listed here.
(b) Excludes General Obligation debt supported by revenues and tax aid and anticipation
certificates and includes lease revenue debt supported by taxes.
(c) Excludes General Obligation debt supported by waste water revenues, 911 user fees, and
housing rental payments. Includes certificates of participation.
(d) Includes general obligation grant anticipation notes.
6. Cost/benefits of alternative uses of funds – There are no alternative uses for the
funds, because if the project is not undertaken, capital improvement bonds will not
be issued.
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 197 of 275
7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements – This project may involve
construction of a new fire station, rebuilding of an existing fire station and rehabbing
of an existing fire station so operating costs such as insurance and utilities will
increase. But the project will also be incorporating updated energy efficient systems
and elimination of three outdated fire stations which should result in decreased
energy costs in the long run.
8. Options for shared facilities with other cities or local governments – There are no
opportunities to house existing City operations in facilities owned by other local units
of government.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing on the 2014-2018
Capital Improvement Plan along with consideration of Issuance of Capital Improvement
Plan Bonds. Three votes of approval are necessary. Following is the recommended
action:
a. Conduct Public Hearing after 7:00 pm
b. Receive reports from representatives of HEDC, Park Commission, ENR
Commission, HPC Commission and Planning Commission
c. Adopt Resolution approving the Capital Improvement Plan and the Issuance
of Capital Improvement Bonds
Attachment(s):
1. Summary of CIP requests
2. Notice calling for public hearing
3. Resolution
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 198 of 275
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
TOTAL
ORIGINAL REQUEST 14,862,220 11,718,000 7,674,180 9,317,000 18,110,000
61,681,400
ADDITIONS
Ambulance refurbish
110,000
110,000
PS Training Facility 1,000,000
1,000,000 1,000,000
3,000,000
Election Equipment 40,000 40,000 40,000
120,000
Beebe Road Street Improvements
100,000 1,190,000
1,290,000
MOVE/CHANGE
Fire Truck (479,120)
479,120
0 Move from 2014 to 2016
Ambulance
(187,280) 187,280
0 Move from 2016 to 2017
Fire Station #7
(4,000,000)
2,500,000
(1,500,000)
Fire Station 3M (850,000)
(850,000)
Commercial Property Redevelopment
(50,000)
(50,000)
Fish Creek Open Space (748,000)
(748,000)
Deer Management (25,000)
(30,000)
(55,000) Operating cost
Gladstone Savanna (300,000)
(300,000) 300,000 300,000
0 Move to later years
EAB Ash Removal/Replanting (50,000) (25,000)
(75,000) Operating cost
MCC Building (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)
(500,000) Levy increase of $65,000
Fleet Management (23,100) (58,900) (1,000) (29,000) 42,000
(70,000)
Arkwright/Sunrise Area Streets (9,000)
(9,000)
Lakewood/Sterling area streets (200,000) (3,520,000) 3,720,000
0 Move from 2015 to 2016
Farrell/Ferndale area streets
(200,000) (3,810,000) 4,010,000
0 Move from 2016 to 2017
Dennis/McClelland area streets
(200,000) (3,970,000) 4,170,000
0 Move from 2017 to 2018
Sterling Street bridge replacement 100,000 1,190,000
(100,000) (1,190,000)
0 Move from 2018 to 2015
DECLINE (to future years)
Fire Truck
(509,900)
(509,900)
Ambulance
(200,000)
(200,000)
PD Expansion - phase II
(3,000,000)
(3,000,000)
Hillcrest Area Roadway Improvements
(1,000,000)
(1,000,000)
Hillcrest Area Redevelopment
(600,000)
(600,000)
Hillcrest Area Streetscape
(1,500,000)
(1,500,000)
Crestview/Highwood Area Streets
(200,000) (8,650,000)
(8,850,000)
UPDATED REQUEST 13,218,000 5,044,100 7,805,120 12,985,280 7,632,000
46,684,500
Attachment 1
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 199 of 275
5517596v1
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON INTENTION TO ISSUE
GENERAL OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS
AND THE PROPOSAL TO ADOPT A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN THEREFOR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
will meet on July 22, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the Maplewood City Council Chambers at 1830 East
County Road B, in Maplewood, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on (a)
the intention to issue general obligation capital improvement plan bonds in an amount not to exceed
$4,000,000 and (b) the proposal to adopt a capital improvement plan therefor. The plan identifies
estimated capital expenditures and funding sources for a five-year period. The proceeds of the
bonds will be used to finance capital improvements for the purpose of public safety facilities
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 and the plan.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above.
If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the bonds is signed by voters equal to five
percent of the votes cast in the City in the last general election and is filed with the City within
thirty days after the public hearing, the bonds may only be issued upon obtaining the approval of
the majority of the voters voting on the question of issuing the bonds.
Individuals unable to attend the public hearing can make written comment by writing to the
City Manager, Maplewood City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109-
2702. Written comments must be received prior to the date and time of the public hearing.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ James Antonen
City Manager
Attachment 2
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 200 of 275
5517596v1
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA
HELD: July 22, 2013
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of
the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in Maplewood,
Minnesota on July 22, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose, in part, of giving preliminary approval to
the issuance of general obligation capital improvement plan bonds and adopting the capital
improvement plan.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member _____________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $4,000,000 AND ADOPTING THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR THE YEARS 2014 THROUGH 2018
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City")
proposes to issue its general obligation capital improvement plan bonds (the "Bonds") and adopt
the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, Capital Improvement Plan for the Years 2014 Through 2018
(the "Plan"); and
B. WHEREAS, the City has caused notice of the public hearing on the intention to
issue the Bonds and on the proposed adoption of the Plan to be published pursuant to and in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521; and
C. WHEREAS, a public hearing on the intention to issue the Bonds and on the
proposed Plan has been held on this date, following published notice of the public hearing as
required by law; and
D. WHEREAS, in approving the Plan, the City Council considered for each project and
for the overall Plan:
1. The condition of the City's existing infrastructure, including the projected
need for repair and replacement;
2. The likely demand for the improvement;
3. The estimated cost of the improvement;
4. The available public resources;
5. The level of overlapping debt in the City;
6. The relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds;
7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements; and
8. Alternatives for providing services more efficiently through shared facilities
with other local governmental units; and
Attachment 3
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 201 of 275
5517596v1
2
E. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the issuance of general obligation
capital improvement plan bonds in the aggregate principal amount of up to $4,000,000 is the best
way to finance the capital improvements identified in the Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, that the City hereby adopts the Plan and authorizes the issuance of up to $4,000,000
aggregate principal amount of general obligation capital improvement plan bonds.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
____________ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
[Bonds must be approved by at least a three-fifths vote of the membership.]
[Issuance of Bonds is subject to a 30-day reverse referendum after the public hearing.]
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 202 of 275
5517596v1
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting Manager of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council, duly called and held on the date
therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true and
complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a resolution giving preliminary
approval to the issuance of the City's general obligation capital improvement plan bonds and
adopting the City's capital improvement plan therefor.
WITNESS my hand on July 22, 2013.
_______________________________________
City Manager
Agenda Item H2
Packet Page Number 203 of 275
Agenda Item I1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Charles Ahl, City Manager
Steve Lukin, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Authorization to Implement Capital Project to Construct Fire Station
Number 1 on 3M Campus
DATE: July 16, 2013
INTRODUCTION
The 3M Companies are currently preparing documents to donate a parcel of land to the City of
Maplewood to be used for a new fire station. An evaluation of the property and site issues has
determined that the site is appropriate for a station and will meet the long-term needs of the Fire
Department from a facility and staffing approach. Earlier in the meeting during the Public
Hearing for the Capital Improvement Plan, the City Council will have approved a resolution
allowing for the issuance of Capital Improvement Bonds for the financing of the Fire Station. In
addition, a Public Hearing was conducted on a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 3M
Research and Development Facility, whereby Maplewood receives up to 20% of the TIF
revenue, a portion of which can support non-structural improvements to the donated land from
3M. These approvals secure the approval necessary to fund the construction of Fire Station 1
on the 3M Campus. Authorization to implement the project and complete final design service is
recommended to remain on schedule for an October 2014 station opening.
Background for Discussion
The parcel of land that 3M is in the process of donating to the City is adjacent to McKnight Road
approximately halfway between Conway Avenue and Minnehaha Avenue. The site is
reasonably sized for a fire station and appropriately located to be consistent with the long range
plans for providing fire service throughout Maplewood’s southern leg. The following FINANCING
PLAN is proposed for this project:
Established Project Budget: $4,250,000
Proposed Funding Sources: $4,250,000
• Sale of Londin Lane Fire Station: $2,000,000
• Proceeds from 3M TIF Plan: $1,250,000
• Proceeds from 2013 CIP Bond: $ 600,000
• 2013 Fees from Permits: $ 400,000
We have earlier selected the team from Kimley-Horn, Inc. to implement this project for the City
and on July 8, 2013, the Council authorized Kimley-Horn to proceed on the first $50,000 of the
design. The cost for design development and final construction documents is $241,800. The
preliminary schedule provides for a completion of the project and opening in October 2014.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
It is recommended that the Council make a motion to approve a Capital project as Fire Station
Number One on the 3M Campus in the total amount of $4,250,000; approve the engineering and
architecture proposal with Kimley-Horn in the amount of $241,800 and provide the City Manager
authority to execute said proposal and, direct the Finance Manager to transfer the necessary
funds for this authorization into the project fund and make the necessary budget adjustments.
Packet Page Number 204 of 275
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
David Fisher, Interim Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit, Our City – Our
Neighborhood Church
LOCATION: 1812 North Saint Paul Road
DATE: July 17, 2013
INTRODUCTION
Samuel Ly, on behalf of Our City – Our Neighborhood Church, is requesting approval of a
conditional use permit (CUP) to locate their congregation to a vacant medical office building,
located at 1812 North Saint Paul Road. The proposed seating capacity for the church is 187.
Refer to the attachments.
BACKGROUND
On August 17, 1972, the city council approved building plans for a medical building.
On March 1, 1973, the city council approved building plans for an expansion to the existing
building.
DISCUSSION
Parking
The applicant indicated the congregation is made up of 45 families. The proposed church
seating capacity is 187 seats. Based on the seating capacity the code requires 47 parking
spaces, based on an average of four persons per vehicle (the average noted in the city’s parking
code). The existing parking lot provides spaces for up to 48 cars – meeting the code
requirements. The applicant has submitted a letter from the CFO of Junior Achievement which
has a large parking lot across the street from the proposed church location. This letter describes
a willingness to develop a shared parking agreement if needed. At this point, city staff does not
see the need to require a shared parking agreement, but if parking becomes an issue any
parking agreements need to be approved by the city council.
As conditions of approval for the CUP, staff is recommending the applicant submit a plan for
restriping the parking lot as the current lines have faded. This plan should detail the number and
dimensions of each space. Also, the applicant shall ensure none of the congregation members
park on the street or on neighboring parking lots.
Trash Enclosure
Currently the site has no enclosed structure for trash receptacles. Code requires any exterior
storage of trash receptacles to be within an enclosed structure. The applicant should be required
to submit design plans for a trash enclosure to be built on site.
CUP Findings for Approval
The zoning ordinance requires that the city council find that all nine “standards” for CUP
approval be met to allow a CUP. In short, these state that the use would (refer to the resolution
for the complete wording):
Agenda Item J1
Packet Page Number 205 of 275
• Comply with the city’s comprehensive plan and zoning code.
• Maintain the existing or planned character of the neighborhood.
• Not depreciate property values.
• Not cause any disturbance or nuisance.
• Not cause excessive traffic.
• Be served by adequate public facilities and police/fire protection.
• Not create excessive additional costs for public services.
• Maximize and preserve the site’s natural and scenic features.
• Not cause adverse environmental effects.
The proposed church would meet these nine criteria. As mentioned above, though, parking
should be restricted to the site and should be monitored and considered during the annual CUP
reviews.
Staff Comments
Building Official
Dave Fisher, the building official, stated the proposed church is a change in use and change in
occupancy. A new certificate of occupancy is required. The building is required to be fire
sprinklered. A design professional is required for building code analysis. This will provide the
new owner with all the requirements.
Assistant Fire Chief
The applicant will need to install fire protection and alarm system per-code. The applicant will
also need to provide access for the fire department in cases where the parking lot is full then the
applicant will need to maintain both exits/entrances in and out of the parking lot.
Police
Lieutenant Richard Doblar had no concerns.
City Engineering
A SAC determination will be required for the change of use. The applicant shall pay all fees
associated with this determination.
COMMITTEE ACTION
Planning Commission
On July 16, 2013, the planning commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of
the proposed CUP for the church. The planning commission did recommend one of the
conditions of approval be amended to allow parking on another site as long as that property
owner and the city council approves.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution approving a conditional use permit for Our City – Our Neighborhood
Church, located at 1812 North Saint Paul Road. Approval is based on the findings required by
ordinance and subject to the following conditions:
1. No exterior site or building exterior changes, except signage, shall take place unless
approved by the city. Signs shall follow the city’s sign ordinance. Signs shall not be installed
Packet Page Number 206 of 275
unless the applicant first obtains sign permits.
2. Any and all trash receptacles shall be contained within an enclosed structure. Any design of
a new structure shall be subject to the city’s design review process.
3. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or the
permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5. All of the applicant’s parking shall be confined to the site and not allowed on city streets or
neighboring properties, unless approved by a neighboring property owner and the city
council.
6. The city shall monitor any parking complaints and report to the city council about compliance
annually during the CUP review.
7. The applicant shall submit a parking restriping plan for staff approval.
8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the building official, assistant fire chief
and city engineer.
Packet Page Number 207 of 275
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the owners of the 29 properties within 500 feet of the proposed church for their
comments. Of the four replies, one had “no comment,” one was in favor, one was opposed and
one had a parking comment.
In Favor
As long as they comply with all applicable city ordinances – especially noise and garbage, we
have no objections. (Junior Achievement, 1800 White Bear Avenue North)
Opposed
I would be opposed to another church in the area. We need more tax based businesses. How
would parking be accommodated. (Debra Pedro, 1829 North Saint Paul Road)
Parking Concners
We, as Landlod, currently lease the adjacent property to O’Reilly Automotive Stores, who are
concerned about the church utilizing O’Reilly’s parking lot which is closer to the proposed church
than their existing parking. This is obviously a major concern to our tenant and us, as Landlaord
as well. As you may be aware, O’Reilly Stories are open and operational on Sundays, and
parking and traffic congestion are items of concern. (Kin Properties, 185 NW Spanish River
Blvd., Boca Raton FL)
No Comments
I have no comments. (Alerus Financial, 401 Demers St., Grand Forks, ND)
Packet Page Number 208 of 275
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 0.58 acres
Existing land use: Vacant, former medical office building
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: North Saint Paul Road and Junior Achievement
South: Branch 28 Building
East: Auto repair business
West: Auto parts retail store
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: MU (mixed use)
Zoning: MU (mixed use)
CODE REQUIREMENTS
Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a CUP for churches.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 44-1097(a) requires that the city council base approval of a CUP on nine findings. Refer to
the findings for approval in the resolution.
APPLICATION DATE
The application for this request was complete on June 11, 2013. State law requires that the city
decide on land use applications within 60 days. The deadline for council action, therefore, is
August 10, 2013.
P:\SEC14\1812 North St Paul Road\1218NorthStPaulRoad_CUP_PC_071613
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Land Use Plan Map
4. Zoning Map
5. Applicant’s Written Narrative
6. Applicant’s Proposed Floor Plan
7. Letter from Junior Achievement, dated June 6, 2013
8. CUP Resolution
Packet Page Number 209 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Church - 1812 North Saint Paul RoadLocation Map
Attachment 1
1812 North Saint Paul Road (Proposed Church)
6
Packet Page Number 210 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Church - 1812 North Saint Paul RoadAerial Map
Attachment 2
1812 North Saint Paul Road (Proposed Church)
7
Packet Page Number 211 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Church - 1812 North Saint Paul RoadFuture Land Use Map - Mixed Use
Attachment 3
1812 North Saint Paul Road (Proposed Church)
8
Packet Page Number 212 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Church - 1812 North Saint Paul RoadZoning Map - Mixed Use
Attachment 4
1812 North Saint Paul Road (Proposed Church)
9
Packet Page Number 213 of 275
Applicant:
Our City- Our Neighborhood Church is applying to the City of Maplewood for approval of an Amendment of
the Conditional Use Application for church services lplace of worship.
Statement of intended Use
Applicant seeks to amend the Conditional Use permit for Our Cily - Our Neighborhood Church as set forth
herein. Applicant requests approval of church services lplace of worship located in a vacant office / medical
building located at l8l2 North St. Paul Road, Maplewood, MN 55109. Applicant wishes to purchase the
property immediately following approval of the Conditional Use application.
Reasons the City should approve request:
1. The intended use of the property as a church is currently and will continue to be located, designed,
maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code
of ordinances.
2. The intended use of the property as a church will not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The intended use of the property as a church will not depreciate property values but will improve
property value since it is currently vacant.
4. The intended use of the property as a church will not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment
or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water,
or air pollution, drainage water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other
nuisances.
5. The intended use of the property as a church will generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. The small
congregation is made up of 45 families and the parking lot of the proposed property has sufficient space
to accommodate necessary parking.
6. The intended use of the property as a church will be served by adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police, and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The intended use of the property as a church will not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The intended use of the property as a church will maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's
natural and scenic features into the development design and future designs.
9. The intended use of the property as a church will cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Attachment 5
10
Packet Page Number 214 of 275
Attachment 6
11
Packet Page Number 215 of 275
撫鸞_1爾 luniげ Achie、.ぐ 籍c,ボ ぶ
th=tiPPcr卜 ↑1ご 、.cゝ 1:1(
1ぶ 00ヽ 1litc IItarヽ lcnll゛ N●rt:、
ヽlaPIcw。。d、卜11,1摯 ぃo(ai｀1`)'
いlが 10('1,1'憲 :|111■IⅢ 10
ゝib、 ltct w、.ヾ iat饉 10,3
A￡狂kⅣ銀田lenぽ
June 6, 2OL3
We at Our City - Our Neighborhood Church
Mr. Ge Lee
Treasurer
Mr Lee:
It was a pleasure talking with you the other day and exploring the option of leasing a
portion of our parking lot during your weekend or evening worship services. We are
open to receiving a proposal from you as your plans move forward.
1
As we discussed, Junior Achievement values its reputation as a responsible
community citizen. To that end, your proposal would need to include responses to
the following provisions:
Meeting Ourinsurance requirements
lndemnification for any damage or clairns your rnembers or guests rnight
cause or have wh∥ e using Our property
Provide any necessary security ofthe parking area when you are using it
Make sure the grounds are cleaned of any debris after each use
You will be in compliance with any requirernents specified by City of
Maplewood ordinances or conditions of your conditional use perrnit`
Specifications regarding tirnes of use and expected vehicle volurnes
Flnancial consideration
I fully believe we can arrive at mutually agreeable terms and wish you well in your
applicatlon process.
Thank you.
Junior Achievement of the Upper Midwest
CFO & Vice President of Finance and Administration
Attachment 7
12
Packet Page Number 216 of 275
Attachment 8
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Our City – Our Neighborhood Church applied for a conditional use permit to
operate a church.
WHEREAS, Section 44-1092(3) of the city ordinances requires a conditional use permit for
churches and institutions of any educational, philanthropic and charitable nature.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property located at 1616 Gervais Avenue. The property
identification number is:
14-29-22-33-0012
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On July 16, 2013, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The planning
commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements. The planning commission also considered the report and recommendation of
city staff. The planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit.
2. On ___________, the city council considered reports and recommendations of the city staff
and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council __________ the above-described
conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation
that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
Packet Page Number 217 of 275
1. No exterior site or building exterior changes, except signage, shall take place unless
approved by the city. Signs shall follow the city’s sign ordinance. Signs shall not be
installed unless the applicant first obtains sign permits.
2. Any and all trash receptacles shall be contained within an enclosed structure. Any
design of a new structure shall be subject to the city’s design review process.
3. The proposed use must be substantially started within one year of council approval or
the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one
year.
4. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
5. All of the applicant’s parking shall be confined to the site and not allowed on city
streets or neighboring properties, unless approved by a neighboring property owner
and the city council.
6. The city shall monitor any parking complaints and report to the city council about
compliance annually during the CUP review.
7. The applicant shall submit a parking restriping plan for staff approval.
8. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the building official, assistant fire
chief and city engineer.
The Maplewood City Council __________ this resolution on ___________.
Packet Page Number 218 of 275
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Martin, AICP, Planner
David Fisher, Interim Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review,
Maplewood Auto Mall, a Used Auto Sales Business
LOCATION: 2529 White Bear Avenue (former Super America building)
DATE: July 17, 2013
INTRODUCTION
Lyudmila Cooper, of Maplewood Auto Mall, is proposing to sell used autos in the vacant, former gas
station building (building “B”) located at 2529 White Bear Avenue. Selling used autos requires a
conditional use permit (CUP) be approved by the city council. In addition, the applicant is proposing
to repaint the façade. There are two existing CUPs for used auto sales at this site; however both only
allow “by appointment only.” Ms. Cooper is requesting a CUP that would allow for regular, walk up
customers.
BACKGROUND
March 22, 1988: The community design review board approved the plans for the Maplewood Auto
Center. This facility was developed as an automotive center for auto parts, sales, and vehicle repairs.
April 24, 1989: The city council denied an appeal of two of the community design review board’s
conditions for approval of the Maplewood Auto Center (Attachment 2) including: 1) The exit on White
Bear Avenue shall have only one exit lane, a “no left turn” sign and stop sign; and 2) there shall be no
outside storage or displays of products or merchandise.
November 22, 1999: The city council approved a CUP for Credit Equity Sales to open a motor vehicle
sales business for this location. In the year 2000, this permit was taken over by Midwest Auto.
July 9, 2001: The city council approved a CUP for Credit Equity to reopen a motor vehicle sales
business for this location.
August 27, 2001: The city council approved a CUP for Alamo Car Rental to lease motor vehicles.
April 22, 2003: The CDRB (community design review board) approved a comprehensive sign plan
amendment and design review change.
July 27, 2004: The CDRB approved changes to the property owner’s color scheme for the larger
building and its pylon sign.
Agenda Item J2
Packet Page Number 219 of 275
DISCUSSION
Conditional Use Permit
Staff’s initial concern was allowing a used car sales business that was not by appointment only.
However, considering the site’s previous use as a gas station, which created frequent activity with
customers driving in and out of the lot, adding another used auto business would not be detrimental to
the character of this development.
Staff’s other major concern for this site is the allocation of parking spaces. For the past couple of
years, staff has dealt with complaints from tenants within the development about other tenants’ use of
spaces. Staff alerted the applicant and the property owner that a parking plan would be a conditional
of approval for the CUP. The applicant has submitted a parking plan which shows how the parking
spaces would be allotted among all the tenants. The parking plan is attached to this report.
Currently there is not an enclosed structure for trash servicing the old gas station building. A
condition of approval would be for the applicant to submit a plan to staff for how it intends to deal with
trash and if needed to submit design plans for an enclosure, subject to the city’s design review
process. Staff recommends conditioning the issuance of a license for auto sales on the applicant
addressing the trash enclosure issue.
Design Review
Staff does not find any problem with this proposal, especially due to the fact that the applicant is
proposing to paint the building with the same color scheme as the adjacent multi-tenant building. The
proposed repainting of the building will give the building a fresh look after sitting vacant for many
years. The renderings submitted by the applicant do not appear to match the intent of applicant’s
color scheme. The design approval is conditioned on the applicant matching the color with the multi-
tenant building.
Signage
There is a comprehensive sign plan approved for this site. Wall Signs for Tenants of building B
(former Super America Gas Station) have the following requirements:
a. Wall signage is limited to two signs including one of individual channel letters not to
exceed 28-inches high and one readerboard sign not to exceed 24 square feet. Both
signs to be placed on the east side of the building.
b. Canopy signage is limited to one individual channel letter sign not to exceed 24 inches
high. Canopy signage is limited to the east side of the canopy.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Fire Marshal’s Comments
Butch Gervais, the Maplewood Fire Marshal, has the following comments regarding this proposal:
• Fire protection systems (fire extinguishers and a sprinkler system) shall meet all requirements
of the code. These systems shall be approved and installed before the applicant begins his
business.
• All vehicles shall be operational. There have been problems with inoperable vehicles on site.
Packet Page Number 220 of 275
• There shall be no parting-out of vehicles outside the building and left in the parking lot.
• The parking lot shall be kept clear of junk.
• All service work that is needed on vehicles shall be completed inside a proper service garage.
• There shall be an after-hours contact person on record with the city’s emergency dispatcher.
Police Comments
Lieutenant Richard Dobblar, of the Maplewood Police Department, finds no public saf ety concerns,
but has concerns regarding the traffic patterns through the lot and the adjacent Mapleridge Shopping
Center.
Building Official’s Comments
David Fisher, the Maplewood Building Official, has the following comments. The applicant shall:
• Verify what was in the space in the past. If the building occupancy has changed, the
applicant shall need to comply with all applicable code requirements relative to his new
building use. A building permit may then be required.
• Verify that the parking used with this business does not obstruct fire department
access for their trucks.
COMMITTEE ACTION
Planning Commission
On July 16, 2013, the planning commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the
proposed CUP revision for used auto sales business.
Community Design Review Board
On June 25, 2013 the community design review board recommended approval of the design plans for
the proposed façade improvements. The board recommended the applicant be required to match the
wall color and striping of building A.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution attached to this report approving a conditional use permit for used car
sales at 2529 White Bear Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by the code and
subject to the following conditions:
1. All façade improvements for the Maplewood Auto Mall used auto sales business shall
follow the plans approved by the city. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
2. The applicant shall comply with the signage requirements of the city code and the auto
center’s sign criteria.
Packet Page Number 221 of 275
3. Fire protection systems (fire extinguishers and a sprinkler system) shall meet all
requirements of the code. These systems shall be approved and installed before the
applicant begins his business.
4. All vehicles shall be operational. There have been problems with inoperable vehicles on
site.
5. There shall be no parting-out of vehicles outside the building and left in the parking lot.
6. The parking lot shall be kept clear of junk.
7. All service work that is needed on vehicles shall be completed inside a proper service
garage.
8. There shall be an after-hours contact person on record with the city’s emergency
dispatcher.
9. If the building occupancy has changed, the applicant shall comply with all applicable code
requirements relative to his new building use. A building permit may then be required.
10. Verify that the parking used with this business does not obstruct fire department access for
their trucks.
11. The proposed motor vehicle sales use must be substantially started within one year of city
council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this
deadline for one year.
12. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
13. The property owner shall provide city staff a plan for trash removal or design plans for a
new enclosed structure, subject to the city’s design review process.
14. All tenants at the Maplewood Auto Center must adhere to the parking plan, dated July 8,
2013, as submitted by the property owner to city staff.
B. Approve the design plans attached to this report for the façade improvements on building B
(former Super America) located at 2529 White Bear Avenue.
1. Color of stucco should be tan, matching building A.
2. Color striping sequence on the canopy shall match the existing sequence on building A.
Packet Page Number 222 of 275
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Staff surveyed the owners of the 18 properties within 500 feet of the proposed used auto sales
business for their comments. Of the four replies, one had “no comment,” two were in favor and one
was opposed.
In Favor
I have no objections as long as they maintain a clean operation especially along White Bear Avenue.
A landscaped buffer along White Bear Avenue would be preferred. (Bachmans, 2600 White Bear
Avenue North)
We agree to the use of the property as proposed by Mila Cooper. (Regal Car Wash, 2635 White Bear
Avenue)
Opposed
My name is Antoniette Guzzo. Per my mother’s (Carol Guzzo) request, I am responding to your
request for my mother’s opinion regarding the Maplewood Auto Mall Proposal. Carol has reviewed
the proposal to have a used auto sales at 2525 White Bear Avenue and with careful consideration has
decided not to provide a favorable opinion. She would not like to see a used car lot in this area is it
does not fit within the demographics of the area.
White Bear Avenue has been an area where people come to frequent specialty stores and Hwy 61
has been delegated for new and used car dealers. Carol would like to preserve White Bear Avenue's
slow paced family orientated atmosphere and request that this Auto Mall is located somewhere on
Hwy 61. Carol is also concerned with the following points if this Auto Mall is approved.
• Bright Lights - Car lots usually require brighter lights to showcase their vehicles and to help
detour theft. If more lights are added it would be an eye soar to surrounding residence which
would bring down the value of their homes.
• Theft - There is a potential of people using the land behind Carol's property to access the Auto
Mall.
(Carol Guzzo 1876 County Road C. E.)
No Comments
I have no comments. (Alerus Financial, 401 Demers St., Grand Forks, ND)
Packet Page Number 223 of 275
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Size: 4.8 acres
Existing Use: Maplewood Auto Center and former Super America building
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: A multi-tenant commercial building and vacant property.
South: Mapleridge Shopping Center
West: Undeveloped wetlands owned by Ramsey County.
East: Across White Bear Avenue are Bachman’s and the Goodwill.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan: C (Commercial)
Zoning: BC (Business Commercial)
Ordinance Requirements
Section 2-290 of the city code requires that the community design review board make the following
findings to approve plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to neighboring,
existing or proposed developments, and traffic is such that it will not impair the desirability of
investment or occupation in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably interfere with the
use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments; and that it will not
create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character of
the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and attractive
development contemplated by this article and the city's comprehensive municipal plan.
3. That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of good
composition, materials, textures and colors.
Section 44-512 (5) (a) requires a CUP for the sale of used motor vehicles.
Section 44-1097 (a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. Refer
to the findings in the attached resolution.
APPLICATION DATE
Staff received the complete application and plans for this proposal on June 11, 2013. State law
requires that the city take action within 60 days of receiving complete applications for a proposal. City
council action is required on this proposal by August 10, 2013, unless the city needs an extension.
p:sec11\Fleetwood Motors
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Land Use Map
4. Zoning Map
5. Site Plan
6. Parking Plan
7. Façade Update Plans
8. Applicant’s Letter of Request
9. Conditional Use Permit Resolution
Packet Page Number 224 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Used Auto Sales - 2525 White Bear Avenue
Location Map
Attachment 1
2525 White Bear Avenue(Proposed Use Auto Sales)
Packet Page Number 225 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Used Auto Sales - 2525 White Bear Avenue
Aerial Map
Attachment 2
2525 White Bear Avenue(Proposed Use Auto Sales)
Packet Page Number 226 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Used Auto Sales - 2525 White Bear Avenue
Future Land Use Map
Attachment 3
2525 White Bear Avenue(Proposed Use Auto Sales)
Commercial
Open Space Government
Commercial
Packet Page Number 227 of 275
Chad Bergo
Proposed Used Auto Sales - 2525 White Bear Avenue
Zoning Map
Attachment 4
2525 White Bear Avenue(Proposed Use Auto Sales)
Business Commercial
Farm
Commercial
Packet Page Number 228 of 275
瓦あ~~~~―
「
一￢
2芦 妃
ヒず ヽ 、
Attachment 5
Packet Page Number 229 of 275
Attachment 6Packet Page Number 230 of 275
ロロMINEIN THE SuMMER口 F2口 1日
MAPLEWロ ロD
AUT口 MALL Attachment 7Packet Page Number 231 of 275
ロロMINEIN THE SuMMER口 F2日 1ヨ
MAPLEWロ ロD
AUT口 MALL Attachment 7Packet Page Number 232 of 275
Gmail - Project Proposal https://mail.google.com/maillul 0 I ?li:2.&iled I 55a3 85 7 7 &view1t&...
2 of3 5/13/201311:38 AM
Attachment 7
Packet Page Number 233 of 275
Lyudmilta ("MiIa")
PROPOSED LOCAIION:
2524 WHITE BEARIAVENEIE,
BUILD園 陽B
I」APLE"OD,W55109
MAPLElW00D AUTO
MALL CUP
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT
Objective
Mila Cooper and Cooper Motors, LLC c/b/a Maplewood Auto Mall desires to move to the former Super
America property located at2525 White Bear Avenue. Cooper Motors is an independent automobile sale
and leasing dealership cunently located in Stillwater. Cooper Motors has reached agreement on a five-year
lease for the property (owned by MNMAC Real Estate Trust, LLC), conditioned upon the City's approval of
this CUP, The proposed Maplewood Auto Mall is a separate structure from the Maplewood Auto Center,
which is an office/light industrial building on the same property with several other small businesses related
primarily to automobile services.
Criteria for Approval Met, in the order they appear on the
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed, and operated in conformity with the
City's comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances.
The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area: The property
has two components: an office building--"Building A" and Building B--the proposed location--which
was formerly operated as a Super America convenience store. The office building is referred to as the
Maplewood Auto Center and houses a variety of car-related businesses. The addition of Maplewood
Auto Mall will compliment the cunent use of the property. Use of the property will require only cos-
metic improvements and changes to signage. Sign and lettering will be within the Plan previously ap-
proved for the Super America signage.
The use will not depreciate the property values: the property will be updated and a lot that has been
inoperable for five years will be put to use.
The business is sales and light mechanical and would not be hazardous or a nuisance due to exces-
sive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference, or other nuisances.
There will be no change in existing traffic patterns. The use of the property would result in considera-
bly less traffic than the previous use as a convenience store.
The use will be served by adequate public facilities and services: all changes to the property are cos-
metic and all existing services are adequate for the proposed use.
CUP Application:
1.
2.
3.
4.
651-551-0086
Attachment 8
Packet Page Number 234 of 275
PR10POSED LOCAnON:
2524 WHITE BEARIAVENEIE,
BmDINGB
¨EW00D,m55109
7.
9.
10
MAPLEW00D AUTO
MALL CUP
The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services: the proposed use
is in conformity with other businesses in the area, plus the sales tax revenue generated by automobile
sales would offset any potential change in existing services.
The use is within the plan already approved by the city, and cosmetic improvements to the vacant
properiy would maximize the design and scenic features of the site.
The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, as any potential effects would be far less
than the gasoline sales and high-traffic business of the Super America or similar convenience store/
gas station.
The proposed use would not require the Coucil to waive any of the CUP criteria.
Lyudmilla ("Mila")
Attachment 8
Packet Page Number 235 of 275
Attachment 9
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Lyudmila Cooper, of Maplewood Auto Mall, applied for a conditional use permit for the
sale of used motor vehicles at the Maplewood Auto Center:
WHEREAS, this permit applies to property located at 2529 White Bear Avenue. The legal
description is:
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS: N 280 FEET OF LOT 2 & ALL OF LOT 1 BLOCK 1, MAPLE RIDGE
MALL (PIN 11-29-22-22-0040)
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On July 16, 2013, the planning commission held a public hearing and recommended that the city
council approve this permit. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The planning commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance
to speak and present written statements. The planning also considered reports and
recommendations of the city staff.
2. On _________, 2013, the city council reviewed this proposal. The council also considered
reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approves the above-described
conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approved this permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with
the City's Comprehensive Plan and this Code.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that
would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or
property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution,
drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would not exceed the design standards of any affected street.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire
protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features
into the development design.
9. The use would cause no more than minimal adverse environmental effects.
Packet Page Number 236 of 275
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All façade improvements for the Maplewood Auto Mall used auto sales business shall
follow the plans approved by the city. The director of community development may
approve minor changes.
2. The applicant shall comply with the signage requirements of the city code and the auto
center’s sign criteria.
3. Fire protection systems (fire extinguishers and a sprinkler system) shall meet all
requirements of the code. These systems shall be approved and installed before the
applicant begins his business.
4. All vehicles shall be operational. There have been problems with inoperable vehicles
on site.
5. There shall be no parting-out of vehicles outside the building and left in the parking lot.
6. The parking lot shall be kept clear of junk.
7. All service work that is needed on vehicles shall be completed inside a proper service
garage.
8. There shall be an after-hours contact person on record with the city’s emergency
dispatcher.
9. If the building occupancy has changed, the applicant shall comply with all applicable
code requirements relative to his new building use. A building permit may then be
required.
10. Verify that the parking used with this business does not obstruct fire department access
for their trucks.
11. The proposed motor vehicle sales use must be substantially started within one year of
city council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend
this deadline for one year.
12. The city council shall review this permit in one year.
13. The property owner shall provide city staff a plan for trash removal or design plans for a
new enclosed structure, subject to the city’s design review process.
14. All tenants at the Maplewood Auto Center must adhere to the parking plan, dated July
8, 2013, as submitted by the property owner to city staff.
The Maplewood City Council ___________ this resolution on ____________, 2013.
Packet Page Number 237 of 275
Item J3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, Director Citizen Services
DATE: July 17, 2013
RE: Request of the City Council to Call a Special Meeting to Canvass the Results of the
August 13, 2013 Municipal Primary Election
There will be a Municipal Primary Election held on August 13, 2013 for the office of Mayor and two
Councilmember seats to determine what candidates will move on to the November 5, 2013 General
Election.
Per State Statute 205.185 Subd. 3 the city council, serving as the canvassing board, shall canvass the
returns and declare the results by resolution between the third and the tenth day after the election.
It is requested that the city council call a special meeting to canvass the results of the Municipal Primary
Election on Friday, August 16, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. or at a time when a quorum of the city council can be
present.
Packet Page Number 238 of 275
Item K1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Chuck Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Michael Thompson, City Engineer / Public Works Director
SUBJECT: East Metro Public Safety Training Center, City Project 09-09, Bid Package 5
1) Approval of Resolution Receiving Bids and Rejecting All Bids for
Burn Building and Burn Tower
22)) Approval of Resolution Authorizing Re-Advertisement for Bids
DATE: July 12, 2013
INTRODUCTION
The Council has previously authorized advertisement for bids for Bid Packages 3, 4 and 5 including
authorizing advertisement for bids for the two primary burn/training buildings on March 25, 2013.
Advertisement for bids for the burn buildings began on June 5, 2013 for Bid Package 5 and the bid opening
took place at 9:00 a.m. July 2, 2013. The council will consider rejecting all bids received.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION
The project has been in the planning stages for several years and in 2012 was presented to, and discussed
with, the City Council, Environmental and Natural Resources Commission, Community Design Review
Board and Planning Commission. The project is located at 1881 Century Avenue North at the intersection
of Trunk Highway 120 and 34th Street North (TH 5).
Bid Packages 1 and 2 which consisted of utility extensions and site grading and cleanup activities have
been completed. Prior to the bid opening of Bid Package 5 it was anticipated that three remaining bid
packages were necessary to complete the facility construction:
• Bid Package 3 Site Civil, Utilities, Traffic Signal, Marshlands
• Bid Package 4 Simulation and Training Building
• Bid Package 5 Burn House and Training Tower
Bid Package 3 is still planned to be completed in 2013, with Bid Package 4 being delayed until additional
funding is available. Bid Package 5, for which the bid opening occurred on July 2, anticipated an
engineering estimate for construction at $1.5 million which would allow the two burn buildings to be
constructed. However, the lowest construction cost of the four bids received came in much higher than
anticipated; at $700,000 over the engineering estimate. The currently identified funding sources cannot
support the award of bid thus the City must reject all bids at this time. The following is a summary of bids:
Bidder Total Bid
Rochon $2,200,000
LS Black Constructors $2,280,000
Shaw-Lundquist Associates $2,341,000
Weber, Inc. $2,800,000
The City’s architect is working to revise the design plans in order to re-bid the project to synch with existing
revenues identified in the approved budget. After a recent meeting of the Steering Committee the tentative
approach is to re-bid Bid Package 5 with the burn building only as the base bid with an extended schedule
which would see it constructed in the April-May timeframe of 2014. The extended schedule is due to the
Packet Page Number 239 of 275
lead time on pre-cast panels and defining a shorter schedule has the potential to increase costs (paying an
acceleration premium for pre-cast members).
Also three alternates could possibly be bid as follows:
- Alternate 1 Tower portion of tower building - 5 story tower
- Alternate 2 Tower portion of tower building - 4 story tower
- Alternate 3 Commercial portion of tower building
In recent years Maplewood has fortunately saved hundreds of thousands of dollars on a number of projects
including large road reconstruction improvements, however with the economy turning around contractors
are not as “hungry” for work. Thus construction bids are higher as demand for labor and materials have
increased significantly in the past year. The pre-cast building members for Bid Package 5 were
significantly higher than what the engineer’s estimate predicted which is a reflection on suppliers raising
prices because of high demand and limited supply.
BUDGET
The City has a total estimated budget of $4,335,000 for the Phase 1 work including a $3,000,000 grant
from the State of Minnesota to design and construct a significant portion of the proposed improvements
and a $450,000 grant from the Ramsey County Environmental Response. The following is a summary of
the currently approved financing plan:
FUNDING
ITEM FUNDING SOURCE AMOUNT
1 STATE BONDING BILL GRANT $3,000,000
2 RAMSEY CO ERF GRANT $450,000
3 CITY EUF FUND $250,000
4 CITY CIP FUND $250,000
5 EAST METRO JPA – SPECIAL ASSESSMENT $175,000
6 MNDOT/MSA STREET ACCOUNT $55,000
7 ST PAUL REGIONAL WATER SERVICES (WATER MAIN LOOP) $55,000
8 SANITARY SEWER FUND $50,000
9 ST PAUL WAC FUND $50,000
TOTAL PHASE 1 $4,335,000
At this time there are no proposed budget adjustments, and the bids received are all proposed to be
rejected. Bid Package 5 will be re-bid in a manner to allow more flexibility in what can be awarded in order
to remain within the approved budget.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the city council approve the attached resolutions for the East Metro Public Safety
Training Center, City Project 09-09, Receiving Bids and Rejecting All Bids and Authorizing Re-
Advertisement for Bid Package 5.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Receiving Bids and Rejecting All Bids
2. Resolution Authorizing Re-Advertisement for Bids
Packet Page Number 240 of 275
RESOLUTION
RECEIVING BIDS AND REJECTING ALL BIDS
FOR BURN TOWER AND BURN BUILDING
BID PACKAGE 5
WHEREAS, that the bids were opened on July 2, 2013 for the construction of a burn tower
and burn building for the East Metro Safety Training Facility, Bid Package 5, Project 09-09, and
those bids are as follows:
Bidder Total Bid
Rochon $2,200,000
LS Black Constructors $2,280,000
Shaw-Lundquist Associates $2,341,000
Weber, Inc. $2,800,000
WHEREAS the bids came in significantly higher than anticipated ($700,000 higher), and
WHEREAS, the City does not have a sufficient funding to award a bid to the low bidder, and
WHEREAS, the City has the authority to reject all bids, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that all bids opened on July 2, 2013 for the construction of a burn tower and burn
building for the East Metro Safety Training Facility, Bid Package 5, Project 09-09, are hereby
rejected.
Adopted by the council on this 22nd day of July, 2013.
Packet Page Number 241 of 275
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING RE-ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
BID PACKAGE 5
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council on May 14, 2012 plans and June
25, 2012, plans and specifications for the East Metro Public Safety Training Center Improvements,
City Project 09-09, were prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented
such plans and specifications to the council for approval.
WHEREAS, the City Council rejected all bids on July 22, 2013 for Bid Package 5 bids opened
on July 2, 2013.
WHEREAS, the plans have been revised to in order to allow re-bidding of said project to
reduce costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. Such preliminary plans for revised Bid Packages 5 a copy of which are available upon
request, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city engineer.
2. The city clerk or office of the city engineer shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such preliminary. The advertisement shall be published at least twice, and in
conformance with State Statutes prior to the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10:00 a.m. on a
date to be determined, at city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with
the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid.
3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open,
and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received.
The council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at a regular city council meeting.
Adopted by the City Council on this 22nd day of July, 2013.
Packet Page Number 242 of 275
Item M1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Charles Ahl, City Manager
FROM: Karen Guilfoile, Director Citizen Services
SUBJECT: Notice of Cancellation of the September 2, 2013 Council Manager Workshop
DATE: July 17, 2013
SUMMARY
Due to September 2, 2013 being a legal holiday, staff is requesting formal cancellation of
the regularly scheduled Council Manager Workshop scheduled on September 2, 2013.
Packet Page Number 243 of 275
Agenda Item M2
Agenda Report
TO: City Council
FROM: Charles Ahl, City Manager
DATE: July 16, 2013
SUBJECT: Council Meeting Calendar Report
INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
This item is informational and intended to provide the Council an indication on the current
planning for upcoming agenda items and the Work Session schedule. These are not official
announcement of the meetings, but a snapshot look at the upcoming meetings for the City
Council to plan their calendars. No action is required.
Upcoming Important Dates to Remember
1. Police Department Open House – Saturday, July 27th ; 4:00 to 6:00 pm
2. National Night Out – Tuesday, August 6th
Upcoming Work Session Schedule
1. Open Monday evening!!: July 29th
2. Department Budget Presentations – Aug 5:
a. Police; Fire/Ambulance; Public Works; Citizen Services; Exec/Leg; Finance
3. Department Budget Presentations – Aug 12: Parks/Rec/MCC; Comm Dev; IT
4. Final Budget Discussion / Review of Options – Aug 12
5. No Work Session currently planned – August 26
6. No Work Session – September 2 due to Labor Day
7. New Commissioner Interviews – September 9
8. MnDOT Presentation on MnPASS on 35E – September 9
9. Approval of Maximum Tax Levy for 2014 – September 9
RECOMMENDATION
No action required.
Packet Page Number 244 of 275
5498279v4
For the Public Record
Meeting Date: July 22, 2013
Agenda Item: H1
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
AND
3M COMPANY
This document drafted by: BRIGGS AND MORGAN (MLI)
Professional Association
2200 First National Bank Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Packet Page Number 245 of 275
5498279v4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
-i-
ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................. 2
Section 1.1 Definitions......................................................................................................... 2
ARTICLE II. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES................................................. 4
Section 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City ...................................................... 4
Section 2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Developer ............................................ 4
Section 2.3 Fiscal Disparities ............................................................................................... 5
ARTICLE III. UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY ........................................ 6
Section 3.1 Site Improvements ............................................................................................ 6
Section 3.2 Reimbursement: Tax Increment Revenue Note ................................................ 6
Section 3.3 Business Subsidies Act ..................................................................................... 7
Section 3.4 Reports .............................................................................................................. 8
Section 3.5 Prevailing Wage ................................................................................................ 8
ARTICLE IV. EVENTS OF DEFAULT .................................................................................. 9
Section 4.1 Events of Default Defined ................................................................................ 9
Section 4.2 Remedies on Default ......................................................................................... 9
Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive..................................................................................... 10
Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver ......................................................................................... 10
Section 4.5 Agreement to Pay Attorney's Fees and Expenses ........................................... 10
Section 4.6 Indemnification of City ................................................................................... 10
ARTICLE V. DEVELOPER'S OPTION TO TERMINATE AGREEMENT ...................... 12
Section 5.1 The Developer's Option to Terminate ............................................................. 12
Section 5.2 Action to Terminate ........................................................................................ 12
Section 5.3 Effect of Termination ...................................................................................... 12
ARTICLE VI. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS ....................................................................... 13
Section 6.1 Restrictions on Use ......................................................................................... 13
Section 6.2 Conflicts of Interest......................................................................................... 13
Section 6.3 Titles of Articles and Sections ........................................................................ 13
Section 6.4 Notices and Demands ..................................................................................... 13
Section 6.5 Counterparts .................................................................................................... 14
Section 6.6 Law Governing ............................................................................................... 14
Section 6.7 Expiration ........................................................................................................ 14
Section 6.8 Provisions Surviving Rescission or Expiration............................................... 14
Section 6.9 Assignability of Agreement ............................................................................ 14
EXHIBIT A Description of Development Property ................................................................... A-1
EXHIBIT B Form of TIF Note ................................................................................................... B-1
EXHIBIT C Site Improvements.................................................................................................. C-1
Packet Page Number 246 of 275
5498279v4
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the ____ day of ___________, 2013, by and between
the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City"), a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and 3M Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Developer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.133, as
amended, the City established Development District No. 1 (the "Development District") and
adopted a development program therefor (the "Development Program"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to laws of Minnesota for 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21
(the "Act"), the City is authorized to establish one or more tax increment financing districts by
December 31, 2018 within parcel 362922240002 (the "Project Area"); and
WHEREAS, The Project Area is located within the Development District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act and the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174 through 469.1794, as amended (the "Tax Increment Act") the City has created Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1-12 (the "Tax Increment District") as a redevelopment district
and has adopted a tax increment financing plan therefor (the "Tax Increment Plan") which
provides for the use of tax increment financing in connection with certain development within
the Project Area; and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve the objectives of the Development Program and the Tax
Increment Plan and particularly to make the land in the Project Area available for development
by private enterprise in conformance with the Development Program, the City has determined to
assist the Developer with the financing of certain costs of a Project (as hereinafter defined) to be
constructed within the Project Area as more particularly set forth in this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City believes that the development and construction of the Project, and
fulfillment of this Agreement are vital and are in the best interests of the City, the health, safety,
morals and welfare of residents of the City, and in accordance with the public purpose and
provisions of the applicable state and local laws and requirements under which the Project has
been undertaken and is being assisted; and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Business Subsidy Law, Minnesota Statutes, Section
116J.993 through 116J.995, apply to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City had adopted criteria for awarding business subsidies that comply
with the Business Subsidy Law, after a public hearing for which notice was published; and
WHEREAS, the Council has approved this Agreement as a subsidy agreement under the
Business Subsidy Law.
Packet Page Number 247 of 275
5498279v4
2
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the
parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows:
ARTICLE I.
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Definitions
Agreement means this Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement, as the same
may be from time to time modified, amended or supplemented;
. All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
Act means laws of Minnesota for 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21;
Business Day means any day except a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday or a day on
which banking institutions in the City are authorized by law or executive order to close;
City means the City of Maplewood, Minnesota;
City Development Agreement means the Development Agreement for 3M Research and
Development Facility Developer Project: 12-15, dated ________, 2013, as the same may be from
time to time modified;
County means Ramsey County, Minnesota;
Developer means 3M Company, a Delaware corporation, its successors and assigns;
Development District means the real property included in Development District No. 1;
Development Program means the development program approved in connection with the
Development District;
Development Property means the real property located within the Tax Increment District
and described in Exhibit A attached to this Agreement;
Event of Default means any of the events described in Section 4.1 hereof;
Note Payment Date means August 1, 2015, and each February 1 and August 1 of each
year thereafter to and including February 1, 2041; provided, that if any such Note Payment Date
should not be a Business Day, the Note Payment Date shall be the next succeeding Business
Day;
Project means the construction of an approximately 400,000 square foot research and
development facility and outdoor parking of approximately 725 spaces on the Development
Property in the City;
Project Area means the 3M Renovation and Retention Project Area consisting of parcel
36.29.22.24.0002;
Packet Page Number 248 of 275
5498279v4
3
Site Improvements means the site improvements to be undertaken on the Development
Property as identified on Exhibit C attached hereto;
State means the State of Minnesota;
Tax Increment Act means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as
amended;
Tax Increment District means Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12, located within
the Project Area, a description of which is set forth in the Tax Increment Financing Plan which
was qualified as a redevelopment district under the Act and the Tax Increment Plan;
Tax Increment Financing Plan means the tax increment financing plan approved for the
Tax Increment District by the City Council and any future amendments thereto;
Tax Increments means 80% of the tax increments derived from the Tax Increment
District which have been received and retained by the City in accordance with the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177;
Termination Date means the earlier of (i) February 1, 2041, (ii) the date the
Reimbursement Amount is paid in full, (iii) the date on which the Tax Increment District expires
or is otherwise terminated, or (iv) the date this Agreement is terminated or rescinded in
accordance with its terms;
TIF Note means the Tax Increment Revenue Note (3M Research and Development
Project) to be executed by the City and delivered to the Developer pursuant to Article III hereof,
the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
Unavoidable Delays means delays, outside the control of the party claiming its
occurrence, which are the direct result of strikes, other labor troubles, unusually severe or
prolonged bad weather, acts of God, fire or other casualty to the Project, litigation commenced
by third parties which, by injunction or other similar judicial action or by the exercise of
reasonable discretion, directly results in delays, or acts of any federal, state or local
governmental unit (other than the City) which directly result in delays.
Packet Page Number 249 of 275
5498279v4
4
ARTICLE II.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Section 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City
(1) The City is a municipal corporation and has the power to enter into this
Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder.
. The City makes the following
representations and warranties:
(2) The Tax Increment District is a "redevelopment district" within the
meaning of the Act, and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the terms of the
Tax Increment Act and the Act.
(3) The development contemplated by this Agreement is in conformance with
the development objectives set forth in the Development Program.
(4) To finance certain costs within the Tax Increment District, the City
proposes, subject to the further provisions of this Agreement, to apply Tax Increments to
reimburse the Developer for a portion of the costs of the Site Improvements incurred in
connection with the Project as further provided in this Agreement.
(5) The City makes no representation or warranty, either express or implied,
as to the Development Property or its condition or the soil conditions thereon, or that the
Development Property shall be suitable for the Developer's purposes or needs.
Section 2.2 Representations and Warranties of the Developer
(1) The Developer is Delaware corporation, and has power to conduct
business in Minnesota, and authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations
hereunder and, by doing so, is not in violation of any provisions of its articles of incorporation or
bylaws, or the laws of the state of Minnesota and by proper action has authorized the execution
and delivery of this Agreement.
. The Developer makes
the following representations and warranties:
(2) The Developer shall cause the Project to be constructed in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement, the Development Program, the City Development Agreement,
and the Tax Increment Plan, and all local, state and federal taxes and regulations (including, but
not limited to, environmental, zoning, energy conservation, building code and public health laws
and regulations).
(3) The construction of the Project would not be undertaken by the Developer,
and in the opinion of the Developer would not be economically feasible within the reasonably
foreseeable future, without the assistance and benefit to the Developer provided for in this
Agreement.
(4) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation
of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and
Packet Page Number 250 of 275
5498279v4
5
conditions of this Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with or results in a breach of,
the terms, conditions or provision of any contractual restriction, evidence of indebtedness,
agreement or instrument of whatever nature to which the Developer is now a party or by which it
is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing.
(5) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City with respect to any
litigation commenced with respect to the Project.
(6) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City in resolution of any
traffic, parking, trash removal or public safety problems which may arise in connection with the
construction and operation of the Project.
(7) The Developer acknowledges that Tax Increment projections contained in
the Tax Increment Plan are estimates only and the Developer acknowledges that it shall place no
reliance on the amount of projected Tax Increments and the sufficiency of such Tax Increments
to reimburse the Developer for the costs of the Site Improvements as provided in Article III.
(8) The Developer will not seek a reduction in the Market Value (as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.02) of the completed Project below $24,720,000. In the event
that the Developer obtains a reduction in Market Value that results in the City having to make a
payment to Ramsey County (the "County Payment"), the Developer agrees that:
(a) If the TIF Note remains outstanding, the next Tax Increments to be paid to
the Developer shall be reduced by the County Payment, and
(b) If the TIF Note is no longer outstanding, Developer shall pay the amount
of the County Payment to the City within thirty (30) days after written notice from the
City as to the amount of the County Payment.
Section 2.3 Fiscal Disparities
. The City has elected the fiscal disparities election set
forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3(b) (the "Outside District Election") for the
Tax Increment District. If the Developer has not obtained one or more building permits with
minimum construction costs of not less than $50,000,000 for renovation and rehabilitation of
Developer facilities (excluding the Project and normal valuation for routine maintenance
projects) in the Project Area by December 31, 2021 the City may change the Outside District
Election to the "in district election" set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3(a)
as permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3(c).
Packet Page Number 251 of 275
5498279v4
6
ARTICLE III.
UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY
Section 3.1 Site Improvements
Section 3.2
. The parties agree that the installation of the Site
Improvements is essential to the successful completion of the Project. The costs of the Site
Improvements shall be paid by the Developer. The Authority shall reimburse the Developer for
up to $9,568,000 of the costs of the Site Improvements actually incurred and paid by the
Developer (the "Reimbursement Amount") as further provided in Section 3.2.
Reimbursement: Tax Increment Revenue Note
(1) The TIF Note shall be dated, issued and delivered when the Developer
shall have demonstrated in writing to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that the construction
of the Site Improvements have been completed and that the Developer has incurred and paid all
costs of the construction of Site Improvements, as described in and limited by Section 3.1 and
shall have submitted paid invoices for the costs of construction of the Site Improvements in an
amount not less than the Reimbursement Amount.
. The City shall reimburse
the Developer for the costs identified in Section 3.1 through the issuance of the City's TIF Note
in substantially the form attached to this Agreement as Exhibit B, subject to the following
conditions:
(2) The unpaid principal amount of the TIF Note shall bear, simple, non-
compounding interest from the date of issuance of the TIF Note, at 5.0% per annum Interest
shall be computed on the basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve (12) 30-day months.
(3) The principal amount of the TIF Note and the interest thereon shall be
payable solely from the Tax Increments.
(4) The payment dates of the TIF Note shall be the Note Payment Dates. On
each Note Payment Date and subject to the provisions of the TIF Note, the City shall pay, against
the principal and interest outstanding on the TIF Note, the Tax Increments received by the City
during the preceding six months. All such payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and
then to reduce the principal of the TIF Note.
(5) The TIF Note shall be a special and limited obligation of the City and not
a general obligation of the City, and only Tax Increments shall be used to pay the principal and
interest on the TIF Note. If, on any Note Payment Date, the Tax Increments for the payment of
the accrued and unpaid interest on the TIF Note are insufficient for such purposes, the difference
shall be carried forward, without interest accruing thereon, and shall be paid if and to the extent
that on a future Note Payment Date there are Tax Increments in excess of the amounts needed to
pay the accrued interest then due on the TIF Note.
(6) The City's obligation to make payments on the TIF Note on any Note
Payment Date or any date thereafter shall be conditioned upon the requirements that: (A) there
shall not at that time be an Event of Default that has occurred and is continuing under this
Agreement and (B) this Agreement shall not have been rescinded pursuant to Section 4.2(b)
hereof.
Packet Page Number 252 of 275
5498279v4
7
(7) The TIF Note shall be governed by and payable pursuant to the additional
terms thereof, as set forth in Exhibit B. In the event of any conflict between the terms of the TIF
Note and the terms of this Section 3.2, the terms of the TIF Note shall govern. The issuance of
the TIF Note pursuant and subject to the terms of this Agreement, and the taking by the City of
such additional actions as bond counsel for the TIF Note may require in connection therewith,
are hereby authorized and approved by the City.
Section 3.3 Business Subsidies Act
(1) In order to satisfy the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993
to 116J.995 (the "Business Subsidies Act"), the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the
amount of the "Business Subsidy" granted to the Developer under this Agreement is the
Reimbursement Amount which is $9,568,000 for the Site Improvements paid by the Developer
and reimbursed to the Developer by Tax Increments and that the Business Subsidy is needed
because the Project is not sufficiently feasible for the Developer to undertake without the
Business Subsidy. The Tax Increment District is a redevelopment district and the public purpose
of the Business Subsidy is to encourage the construction of a research and development facility.
The Developer agrees that it will meet the following goals (the "Goals") in connection with the
development of the Project: It will cause to retain at least seven hundred (700) jobs at a average
wage of at least $50.00 per hour, exclusive of benefits, within two years from the "Benefit Date",
which is the date the Developer substantially completes the Project, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 116J.993, Subdivision 4.
.
(2) If the Goals are not met, the Developer agrees to repay all or a part of the
Business Subsidy to the City, plus interest ("Interest") set at the implicit price deflator defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.70, Subdivision 2, accruing from and after the Benefit Date,
which is the earlier of the date the Developer completes or occupies the Project, compounded
semiannually. If the Goals are met in part, the Developer will repay a portion of the Business
Subsidy (plus Interest) determined by multiplying the Business Subsidy by a fraction, the
numerator of which is the number of jobs in the Goals which were not retained at the wage level
set forth above and the denominator of which is seven hundred (700) (i.e., number of jobs set
forth in the Goals).
(3) The Developer agrees to comply with the following: (i) report its progress
on achieving the Goals to the City until the later of the date the Goals are met or two years from
the Benefit Date, or, if the Goals are not met, until the date the Business Subsidy is repaid, (ii)
include in the report the information required in Minnesota Statutes, Section 116J.994,
Subdivision 7 on forms developed by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic
Development, and (iii) send completed reports to the City. The Developer agrees to file these
reports no later than March 1 of each year commencing March 1, 2016, and within 30 days after
the deadline for meeting the Goals. The City agrees that if it does not receive the reports, it will
mail the Developer a warning within one week of the required filing date. If within 14 days of
the post marked date of the warning the reports are not made, the Developer agrees to pay to the
City a penalty of $100 for each subsequent day until the report is filed up to a maximum of
$1,000.
Packet Page Number 253 of 275
5498279v4
8
(4) The Developer agrees to continue operations within the City for at least
five (5) years after the Benefit Date.
(5) There are no other state or local government agencies providing financial
assistance for the Project other than the City which is providing the Tax Increment Note.
(6) There is no parent corporation of the Developer.
(7) The Developer certifies that it does not appear on the Minnesota
Department of Employment and Economic Development's list of recipients that has failed to
meet the terms of a business subsidy agreement.
Section 3.4 Reports
Section 3.5
. Subject to Section 3.3, the Developer shall provide the City
reports in a timely manner with such information about the Project as the City may reasonably
request, including information regarding goals as to minimum employment and wage levels set
forth in Section 3.3, for purposes of satisfying any reporting requirements imposed by law on the
City.
Prevailing Wage. The Developer shall pay prevailing wages, as provided
in the City Development Agreement, for the portions of the Site Improvements described in
Section 25 of the City Development Agreement.
Packet Page Number 254 of 275
5498279v4
9
ARTICLE IV.
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
Section 4.1 Events of Default Defined
(a) Failure by the Developer to timely pay any ad valorem real property taxes
assessed, special assessments, or other City charges with respect to the Development
Property.
. The following shall be "Events of Default"
under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean whenever it is used in this
Agreement any one or more of the following events:
(b) Failure by the Developer to cause the construction of the Project to be
completed pursuant to the terms, conditions and limitations of this Agreement.
(c) Failure of the Developer to observe or perform any other covenant,
condition, obligation or agreement on its part to be observed or performed under this
Agreement.
(d) If the Developer shall
(A) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization,
arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief
under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended or under any similar
federal or state law; or
(B) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or
(C) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they
become due; or
(D) be adjudicated as bankrupt or insolvent; or if a petition or answer
proposing the adjudication of the Developer, as a bankrupt or its reorganization
under any present or future federal bankruptcy act or any similar federal or state
law shall be filed in any court and such petition or answer shall not be discharged
or denied within sixty (60) days after the filing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or
liquidator of the Developer, or of the Project, or part thereof, shall be appointed in
any proceeding brought against the Developer, and shall not be discharged within
sixty (60) days after such appointment, or if the Developer, shall consent to or
acquiesce in such appointment.
Section 4.2 Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of Default referred to in
Section 4.1 occurs and is continuing, the City, as specified below, may take any one or more of
the following actions after the giving of thirty (30) days' written notice to the Developer, but only
if the Event of Default has not been cured within said thirty (30) days:
Packet Page Number 255 of 275
5498279v4
10
(a) The City may suspend its performance under this Agreement and the TIF
Note until it receives assurances from the Developer, deemed adequate by the City, that
the Developer will cure its default and continue its performance under this Agreement.
(b) The City may cancel and rescind the Agreement and the TIF Note.
(c) The City may take any action, including legal or administrative action, in
law or equity, which may appear necessary or desirable to enforce performance and
observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Developer under this
Agreement.
Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive
Section 4.4
. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to
the City is intended to be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and
every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given
under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or
omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or
power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be
exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient.
No Implied Waiver
Section 4.5
. In the event any agreement contained in this
Agreement should be breached by any party and thereafter waived by any other party, such
waiver shall be limited to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any
other concurrent, previous or subsequent breach hereunder.
Agreement to Pay Attorney's Fees and Expenses
Section 4.6
. Whenever any Event of
Default occurs and the City shall employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of
payments due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or observance of any
obligation or agreement on the part of the Developer herein contained, the Developer agrees that
it shall, on demand therefor, pay to the City the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other
expenses so incurred by the City.
Indemnification of City
(1) The Developer (a) releases the City and its governing body members,
officers, agents, including the independent contractors, consultants and legal counsel, servants
and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties") from, (b) covenants and agrees that the
Indemnified Parties shall not be liable for, and (c) agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
Indemnified Parties against, any claim, cause of action, suit or liability for loss or damage to
property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or resulting from any
defect in the Project or on the Development Property in which the claim is based upon the acts of
the Developer or of others acting on behalf of or under the direction or control of the Developer.
.
(2) Except for any willful misrepresentation or any willful or wanton
misconduct of the Indemnified Parties, the Developer agrees to protect and defend the
Indemnified Parties, now and forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any
claim, demand, suit, action or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever
arising or purportedly arising from the actions or inactions of the Developer (or if other persons
acting on its behalf or under its direction or control) under this Agreement, or the transactions
Packet Page Number 256 of 275
5498279v4
11
contemplated hereby or the acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation of
the Project; provided, that this indemnification shall not apply to the warranties made or
obligations undertaken by the City in this Agreement or to any actions undertaken by the City
which are not contemplated by this Agreement.
(3) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of the
City contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements
and obligations of the City and not of any governing body member, officer, agent, servant or
employee of the City.
Packet Page Number 257 of 275
5498279v4
12
ARTICLE V.
DEVELOPER'S OPTION TO TERMINATE AGREEMENT
Section 5.1 The Developer's Option to Terminate
Section 5.2
. This Agreement may be terminated
by the Developer, if (i) the Developer is in compliance with all material terms of this Agreement
and no Event of Default has occurred; and (ii) the City fails to comply with any material term of
this Agreement, and, after written notice by the Developer of such failure, the City has failed to
cure such noncompliance within ninety (90) days of receipt of such notice, or, if such
noncompliance cannot reasonably be cured by the City within ninety (90) days, of receipt of such
notice, the City has not provided assurances, reasonably satisfactory to the Developer, that such
noncompliance will be cured as soon as reasonably possible.
Action to Terminate
Section 5.3
. Termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section
5.1 must be accomplished by written notification by the Developer in the City within sixty (60)
days after the date when such option to terminate my first be exercised. A failure by the
Developer to terminate this Agreement within such period constitutes a waiver by the Developer
of its rights to terminate this Agreement due to such occurrence or event.
Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this
Article V, this Agreement shall be from such date forward null and void and of no further effect;
provided, however, the termination of this Agreement shall not affect the rights of either party to
institute any action, claim or demand for damages suffered as a result of breach or default of the
terms of this Agreement by the other party, or to recover amounts which had accrued and
become due and payable as of the date of such termination. Upon termination of this Agreement
pursuant to this Article V, the Developer shall be free to proceed with the Project at its own
expense and without regard to the provisions of this Agreement; provided, however, that the City
shall have no further obligations to the Developer with respect to reimbursement of the expenses
set forth in Section 3.2.
Packet Page Number 258 of 275
5498279v4
13
ARTICLE VI.
ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Section 6.1 Restrictions on Use
Section 6.2
. Until termination of this Agreement, the Developer
agrees for itself, its successors and assigns and every successor in interest to the Development
Property, or any part thereof, that the Developer and its successors and assigns shall operate, or
cause to be operated, the Project as a research and development facility or other use authorized
by the zoning requirements of the City and shall devote the Development Property to, and in
accordance with, the uses specified in this Agreement.
Conflicts of Interest
Section 6.3
. No member of the governing body or other official
of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the
Development Property or the Project, or any contract, agreement or other transaction
contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder or with respect thereto, nor shall any such
member of the governing body or other official participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the interests of any corporation,
partnership or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member,
official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the City in the event of any default
or breach by the Developer or successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement.
Titles of Articles and Sections
Section 6.4
. Any titles of the several parts, articles and
sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be
disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
Notices and Demands
(a) in the case of the Developer is addressed to or delivered personally to:
. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, a notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to any
other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally, and
3M Company
3M Center Building 224-05-N-40
St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
Attn: Real Estate Department
(b) in the case of the City is addressed to or delivered personally to:
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Maplewood City Hall
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109-2702
or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to
time, designate in writing and forward to the other, as provided in this Section.
Packet Page Number 259 of 275
5498279v4
14
Section 6.5 Counterparts
Section 6.6
. This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
Law Governing
Section 6.7
. This Agreement will be governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State.
Expiration
Section 6.8
. This Agreement shall expire on the Termination Date.
Provisions Surviving Rescission or Expiration
Section 6.9
. Sections 4.5 and 4.6 shall
survive any rescission, termination or expiration of this Agreement with respect to or arising out
of any event, occurrence or circumstance existing prior to the date thereof.
Assignability of Agreement. This Agreement may be assigned only with
the consent of the City. The TIF Note may only be assigned pursuant to the terms of the TIF
Note.
Packet Page Number 260 of 275
5498279v4
S-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be duly executed in its
name and on its behalf and the Developer has executed this Agreement in its name and on its
behalf, on or as of the date first above written.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
By ____________________________________
Its Mayor
By ____________________________________
Its Administrator
This is a signature page to the Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement by and among
the City of Maplewood and 3M Company
Packet Page Number 261 of 275
5498279v4
S-2
3M COMPANY
By ____________________________________
Its ____________________________________
This is a signature page to the Tax Increment Financing Development Agreement by and among
the City of Maplewood and 3M Company
Packet Page Number 262 of 275
5498279v4
A-1
EXHIBIT A
Description of Development Property
PID: 36.29.22.24.0002
Packet Page Number 263 of 275
5498279v4
B-1
EXHIBIT B
Form of TIF Note
No. R-1 $_________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
TAX INCREMENT REVENUE NOTE
(3M RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT)
The City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City"), hereby acknowledges itself to be
indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay the amounts hereinafter described (the
"Payment Amounts") to 3M Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Developer" or the
"Registered Owner"), but only in the manner, at the times, from the sources of revenue, and to
the extent hereinafter provided.
The principal amount of this Note shall equal from time to time the principal amount
stated above, as reduced to the extent that such principal installments shall have been paid in
whole or in part pursuant to the terms hereof; provided that the sum of the principal amount
listed above shall in no event exceed $9,568,000 as provided in that certain Tax Increment
Financing Development Agreement, dated as of _________________, 2013, as the same may be
amended from time to time (the "Development Agreement"), by and between the City and the
Developer. The unpaid principal amount hereof shall bear simple, non-compounding interest
from the date of this Note at the rate of 5.00% per annum. Interest shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year consisting of twelve (12) 30-day months.
The amounts due under this Note shall be payable on August 1, 2015, and on each
August 1 and February 1 thereafter to and including February 1, 2041, or, if the first should not
be a Business Day (as defined in the Development Agreement) the next succeeding Business
Day (the "Payment Dates"). On each Payment Date the City shall pay by check or draft mailed
to the person that was the Registered Owner of this Note at the close of the last business day of
the City preceding such Payment Date an amount equal to the Tax Increments (hereinafter
defined) received by the City during the six month period preceding such Payment Date. All
payments made by the City under this Note shall first be applied to accrued interest and then to
principal.
The Payment Amounts due hereon shall be payable solely from 80% of tax increments
(the "Tax Increments") from the Development Property (as defined in the Development
Agreement), within the City's Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-12 (the "Tax Increment
District") within its Project Area (as defined in the Development Agreement) located in
Development District No. 1, which are paid to the City and which the City is entitled to retain
pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as the
Packet Page Number 264 of 275
5498279v4
B-2
same may be amended or supplemented from time to time (the "Tax Increment Act") and the
laws of Minnesota for 2013, Chapter 143, Article 9, Section 21 (the "Act"). This Note shall
terminate and be of no further force and effect following the last Payment Date defined above,
on any date upon which the City shall have terminated the Development Agreement under
Section 4.2(b) thereof or the Developer shall have terminated the Development Agreement under
Article V thereof, on the date the Tax Increment District is terminated, or on the date that all
principal and interest payable hereunder shall have been paid in full, whichever occurs earliest.
The City makes no representation or covenant, express or implied, that the Tax
Increments will be sufficient to pay, in whole or in part, the amounts which are or may become
due and payable hereunder.
The City's payment obligations hereunder shall be further conditioned on the fact that no
Event of Default under the Development Agreement shall have occurred and be continuing at the
time payment is otherwise due hereunder, but such unpaid amounts shall become payable if said
Event of Default shall thereafter have been cured; and, further, if pursuant to the occurrence of
an Event of Default under the Development Agreement the City elects to cancel and rescind the
Development Agreement, the City shall have no further debt or obligation under this Note
whatsoever. Reference is hereby made to all of the provisions of the Development Agreement,
including without limitation Section 3.2 thereof, for a fuller statement of the rights and
obligations of the City to pay the principal of this Note, and said provisions are hereby
incorporated into this Note as though set out in full herein.
This Note is a special, limited revenue obligation and not a general obligation of the City
and is payable by the City only from the sources and subject to the qualifications stated or
referenced herein. Neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing powers of the City are pledged
to the payment of the principal of this Note and no property or other asset of the City, save and
except the above-referenced Tax Increments, is or shall be a source of payment of the City's
obligations hereunder.
This Note is issued by the City in aid of financing a project pursuant to and in full
conformity with the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, including the Tax
Increment Act.
This Note may be assigned only with the consent of the City which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld. In order to assign the Note, the assignee shall surrender the same to the
City either in exchange for a new fully registered note or for transfer of this Note on the
registration records for the Note maintained by the City. Each permitted assignee shall take this
Note subject to the foregoing conditions and subject to all provisions stated or referenced herein.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions, and things
required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to have happened,
and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Note have been done, have
happened, and have been performed in regular and due form, time, and manner as required by
law; and that this Note, together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the date
hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery, does not cause the indebtedness of the
City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon.
Packet Page Number 265 of 275
5498279v4
B-3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Maplewood, Minnesota, by its City Council, has
caused this Note to be executed by the manual signatures of its Mayor and Administrator and has
caused this Note to be dated as of __________________, 201__.
_________________________________ ___________________________________
Administrator Mayor
Packet Page Number 266 of 275
5498279v4
B-4
CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRATION
It is hereby certified that the foregoing Note was registered in the name of 3M Company,
and that, at the request of the Registered Owner of this Note, the undersigned has this day
registered the Note in the name of such Registered Owner, as indicated in the registration blank
below, on the books kept by the undersigned for such purposes.
NAME AND ADDRESS OF
REGISTERED OWNER
DATE OF
REGISTRATION
SIGNATURE OF CITY
ADMINISTRATOR
3M Company
3M Center Building 224-05-N-40
St. Paul, MN 55144-1000
Attn: Real Estate Department
________________
______________________
__________________________
__________________________
__________________________
________________
______________________
__________________________
__________________________
__________________________
________________
______________________
__________________________
__________________________
__________________________
________________
______________________
Packet Page Number 267 of 275
5498279v4
C-1
EXHIBIT C
Site Improvements
Site Preparation
Grading/earthwork
Parking, Driveway, Curb and Sidewalk Improvements
SAC/WAC
Landscaping, including irrigation
Foundations and Footings
Engineering
Survey
Environmental Testing
Soil Borings
On Site Utilities
Storm Water/Ponding
Outdoor Lighting
Steam and Chilled Water
Packet Page Number 268 of 275
Packet Page Number 269 of 275
Packet Page Number 270 of 275
Packet Page Number 271 of 275
Packet Page Number 272 of 275
Packet Page Number 273 of 275
Packet Page Number 274 of 275
Packet Page Number 275 of 275