The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978 10-05 City Council PacketAGENDA Maplewood City Council 7:80 P.M., 'Thursday, October 5, 1978 Municipal Administration Building Meeting 78-28 (A) h TO ORDER (B) ROLL CALL (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- None (D) APPROVAL Of AGENDA (E) H I. 1979 Budget - (7:30 P.M.) 2. Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) 13 Acres at 2413 Carver Avenue (7:30 P.M.) 3. On -Sale Beer License (3.2) 1690 English St. (7:45 P.M;) CF) AWARDING OF BIDS -- None (G) (II) (I) (J) APPROVAL of ACCOUNTS UNPINISHID BUSINESS - None VISITOR PRESEN'iATION NEW BUSINESS 1. Lot Divisions: a. 1630 N. Sterling (Sehmoke& }v b. Northerly side of Beam Avenue West of Highway 61 (Pi. let ich) C. 2660 Linwood Avenue (Dreary) 2. Final Plat: Maple Greens 3rd Addi.t:ion� 3. County Park Improvements - (Battle Creek) (Phalen) q. Certification of Delinquent North St. Paul Accounts p. Refund of Sanitary Sewer Stub-- In.- Assossmen 9. Building and Site Plan Reviews (Building Rodeo Midwest (1160 Frost Avenue 1-0. Building and Site Plan Reviews (Building Water Surcharge -- 63 Fenton St Addit:i.ons) Additions) 3M Building #240 - 3M 11. Park Land Acquisition - Pleasantview Park_ ('l.) COU.NICTL PRES111'; ATIONS 1 . 2. 3. 4. 6. '1 8. 9. 10.. (L) ADMINTSTRATIVF. PRESI:N'IATIONS (M) ADJOURNMENT di 1 r ,r i1 ?43 Sy I1EMORANDUM TO Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager RE Public Hearing - 1979 Budget DATE: September 29, 1978 Federal revenue sharing laws require that a public hearing be held concerning the City's proposed 1979 Budget and the use of revenue sharing monies. A copy of the public hearing notice is attached (Exhibit A). Adoption of the 1979 Budget requires passage of the attached proposed resolution (Exhibit B). The expenditure amounts listed in the resolution are based upon the proposed budget given to the Council September 7th with the following adjustments in the Emergency Preparedness division of the Public Safety Department (p. 31): 1. $1,430 added to acct. 4020 (Wages, Part -time & Temporary). Approximately $430 is a contingency for a 1979 cost -of- living salary increase for the Civil Defense Director, $600 is to pay reserve officers to clean shelters, and $400 is to pay instructors to pro - vide firearms training to reserve officers. 2. $250 added for tools and a ladder which will be included in acct. 4230 (Small Tools). A second resolution (Exhibit C) must be adopted that levies taxes -.payable in 1979 that will provide an amount sufficient enough to support the 1979 Budget. The second part of this resolution adjusts the tax levies previously certified for all existing bond issues. :Action. by Counciln I;ndoz sed__�_� Data...__. r-Ari I vib H 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSI:;ll J.979 BUDCE'1' NOTICE' TS BERI'.BY CIVEN, that the Plaplewood City Council will hold a public hearing to consider proposed uses of federal revenue sh,UU:ing funds by the City of Maplewood during the 1979 and the relat:i.0nship of such finds to the City's entire 1.979 Budget. ' hearing will begin at: 7:30 p.m. on October 5, 1978, and will be held in the Couuc:i.l. Chambers at 1.380 Frost: Avenue. All citizens will. have the )ppor.tun:iLy to pr:ov.i.de written and oral comments on the possible uses of - veenue sharing fund , and C.o aslc quest.:i.on s concerning the entire budget and the r:c:lat -- ship of revenue sharing funds to the entire budget, The following is a summary of the proposed budget: Proposed -197 Budge General Government Administrative Services Public Safety Public Works Community Services Community Development Central Equipment Service-.s Utilities Bond Redemption Other. TOTALS 156,600 298,820 2,145,960 875,040 624,110 214,650 315,410 1,034,280 2,431,280 1 $ 8,230,100 Proposed Revenue Sharing Portion $ 67,350 — 0 — 107,350 141,800 4,300 — 0 — 37,700 — 0 - - 0 — 88 i 950 447,450 A detailed breakdocm of the above will be available for public inspection during ormal business hours at the City Hall, 1380 Frost Avenue. ANY PERS02`.S HAVING INTEREST in this matter are invited to at't'end and be heard. PY CM)ER OF THE CI'T'Y COUNCIL .THIS 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1978. Mrs. Lucille Aurelius City Clerk - Publ:i_sh: September 20, 1978 n , �/l.cze; { C> �'1 1. ,�:c°<..,.✓ 1 /1 _.._.. e Exhibit B A RESOLUTION ADOPTING 1979 BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the following amounts are hereby adopted as the 1979 Budget for expenditures: General Fund: General Government Administrative Services Public Safety Public Works Community Services Community Development Non- departmental Park Development Fund: Community Services Planning Fund: Community Development Revenue Sharing Fund: General Government Public Safety Public Works Community Services :Non- Departmental Central Equipment Services Water Fund: Water Maintenance Sewer Fund: Sewage Disposal V.E.M. Fund: Central Equipment Services -Debt Service Funds: Special Assessment Fund- -Debt: Service Accounts Total $ 89,250 298,820 2,040,290 733,240 585,810 179,060 45 3,971,470 34,000 35,590 67,350 107,350 141,800 4,300 88,950 37,700 27,060 1,007,220 277,710 137,300 2,293,980 $ 8,231,780 Exhbit C A RESOLUTION LEVYING TAXES PAYABLE IN 1979 that: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 1. The following amounts of taxes be levied for 1978, payable in 1979, upon the taxable property in said City of Maplewood, for the following purposes: General Fund $2,010,280 Park Development Fund 91,100 Planning Fund 20,000 Bonds and Interest 619,430 Total Levy $2,740,810 2. There is on hand in the following sinking funds excess amounts as indicated after each fund and such shall be used to pay on the appropriate obligations of the City: Description 1960 Sanitary Sewer Imp. Bonds, Series 3 1960 Sanitary Sewer Imp. Bonds, Series 4 1964 Consolidated Imp. Bonds 1965 Improvement Bonds 1965 Building Bonds 1967 Gen'l. Obligation Imp. Bonds 1968 Improvement Bonds 1973 Improvement Bonds Total Reduction in Levv: $ 10,000 25,000 15,000 11,000 3,155 5,500 7,000 72,470 149,125 In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 475.61 and 273.13, Subd. 19 (3), (a), (b), (c) and Chapter 297a and Chapter 162 of Minnesota Statutes, the County Auditor of Ramsey County is hereby authorized and directed to reduce by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would be otherwise included in the rolls for the year 1978 and collectible in 1979. 3. It has been determined that the following bond issues have insufficient projected assets to meet projected liabilities, as required by State Statute, and the original resolution levying advalorem taxes must be increased in the following amounts: Description 1970 Improvement Bonds 1971 Improvement Bonds 1971 State Aid Bonds 1972 Improvement Bonds, Series 1 1972 Improvement Bonds, Series 2 Total Increase in Lev $ 1,000 3,000 5,000 1,000 1,000 11,000 In accordance with Minnesota Statute 475.61, Subd. 2, the County Auditor of Ramsey County is .hereby authorized and directed to increase by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would be otherwise included in the rolls for the year 1978 and collectible in 1979. .. ..... ._. •,; n r'%IIIPIL L (Cont') 4. Changes setforth in sections one (1) and (2), above result in a net reduction of $138,125.00 and are summarized and hereby adopted as Exhibit "A ". Such amounts shown are the total amounts to be spread on the rolls in 1978 and collectible in 1979 for each of the bond issues shown, including the reductions and increases in levy amounts setforth in sections one (1) and two (2), above. 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to furnish a copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Ramsey County forthwith. EXHBIT A BOND ISSUES Sanitary Sewer *Imps. No. 2 Sanitary Sewer *Impr. No. 2 Project No. 4 *Sanitary Sewer Impr. Ser. 3 "Sanitary Sewer Impr. Ser. 4 Sanitary Sewer & Street Impr. Sanitary Sewer, Water & Str. Impr. General Improvement Ser. B Water Main Extension Impr. Consolidated Improvement Municipal Building Improvement G. 0. Improvement G. 0. Improvement Sanitary Sewer G. 0. Improvement G. 0. Improvement * *G. 0. Improvement * * *G. 0. Improvement * *G. 0. Improvement State Aid Bonds G. 0. Improvement Series 2 G. 0. Improvement G. 0. Improvement G. 0. Improvement * * *G. 0. Improvement * * *G. 0. Improvement * * *G. 0. Improvement G. 0. Improvement G. 0. Improvement TOTALS Prin. PER BOND AMOUNT Amount Date REGISTER LEVIED 600M 5/l/58 $ -0- $ -0- 500M 9/l/59 -0- -0- 300M 12/1/59 -0- -0- 600M 7/1/60 10,000 -0- 400M 10/1/60 25,000 -0- 300M 6/1/61 5,300 5,300 405M 3/1/62 10,000 10,000 365M 10/1/62 43,100 43,100 600M 9/16/64 16,500 16,500 975M 12/1/64 15,000 -0- 175M 5/1/65 13,655 10,500 835M 12/1/65 11,000 -0- 750M 12/1/66 14,000 14,000 645M 7/1/67 10,000 10,000 450M 12/1/67 5,500 -O- 380M 12/1/68 7,000 -0- 1,980M 12/1/69 75,000 78,000 605M 12/1/70 15,000 16,000 1,740M 8/1/71 50,000 50,000 540M 8/1/71 -0- 5,000 3,815M 10/1/77 -0- -0- 1,090M 5/l/72 20,000 21,000 670M 12/1/72 30,000 31,000 2,175M 7/1/73 77,300 4,830 1,240M ll/l/74 35,000 35,000 1,360M 12/1/75 55,000 55,000 1 0 990M 5/1/76 123,500 123,500 3,730M 4/1/77 13,200 13,200 995M 4/1/77 77,500 77,500 $757,555 $619,430 Tax Levies Pledged to Redeem Following Issues: G. 0. Refunding Improvement Bonds 1963 ** G. 0. Refunding Improvement Bonds 1974 * ** G. 0. Refunding Improvement Bonds 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER REGARDING: APPLICATION FOR ON -SALE 3.2 BEER PERMIT AT 1690 ENGLISH STREET DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1978 L= - 0 Mr. Jerald D. Engevik, 1555 Randolph Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, has applied for an On -Sale 3.2 Beer permit and restaurant license for 1690 English Street (formerly the 7 -11 Store). Residents of the area (within approximately 200 feet) have been notified of the public hearing. A report from the Department of Public Safety will be available by Thursday evening. �I✓ r l' Action by COV.ncil: ected_._- D3te__----- APPLICATION FOR LICENSE TO SELL NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUORS APPLICATION FOR TAVERN LICENSE .License Fee Should Accompany Application TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY Or Fe To—__Paid MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: Receipt No._ On $ Off $___ State Of Min neSOta ss. Tave - CODU -NTY OF RAMSEY Dat 19— �/ e 2 /1 CrC V, k being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he hereby applt r f or a license for the term of f rom the day of— 19_., to sell at w wlesale- retail (strike out one), non - intoxicating malt liquors, as the same are defined by law, for consumption — off (strike out one). those premises, or for a tavern (strike out if not applicable) located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, described as follows: (Insert here the legal descrip- tio of the land upon which the building is located.).Q C - C201L c2 c, * ;C J '7� L at which place said applicant operates the business of and to that end represents and states that the followipg statements are true and correct: What is your home address ? _ / J S J r- a uc+ W c, What is the address of the place you are to operate under the said Are you a citizen of the United States ?--- S b irthplac e ST ��'`C �7 . D ate of Birth �n�z- i f a naturalized citizen, where and when did you receive your citizenship papers? _ Have you ever been arrested? when and where? Have you ever been convicted of a crime? jC -.? If so, where, when and upon what charge? State what name your place of business will be operated Are all delinquent taxes paid upon the above described Do you intend to permit dancing? ��o If answer is "Yes" have you applied for tavern license? Do you wish to apply for a tavern license at this time ? Has a License to sell non - intoxicating malt liquors been is�cd to you prior to this date? E;I If so, at what .Applicant further states that he is not now the holde of, nor has he made application for, nor does he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealers Special tax stamp for the same of intoxicat- ing liquor. t� / 19 Z N ul -:-cam , v .C'_'i`�- �C+" Ad; I I'. Type of Pirelm ty z I 1 \ 00 K Co-ord. S I I C! 0 t. ,,, tore (7-J-J(i\ , - - ---- 2,000 sq. ft. Gross building Area -- L Dimensions 141,11 by 97.01 Land Ditrw.nsions — Zonin( Busin(�ss Commerci., Cuilst I tic I is n Age of I General Condition u x C J- I I I. . ...... .. Rest Rooms: Men I - I -, Q — - L 0 0 j ...... Heal type # of units A/C Coeval'!, N1111, Parking 6 ---2 CJ fg41 '11,1,1 Lict & Capacity-- no Loading Docks 110 Drive in Trackage— no Sprinkler Systp.al —Vi V J. Tl — j C 5. Floor Covering Voleallcovexing van e 1. (, d Other Information N a 11L ---- (:,QDJ, i IV B IMC of 9 5 uild ing Pr ices 000. Gross land Arva__._�3 689 sqmare feet CS 1xJ No No. of Floors—PP— fkallt.--T' Si ze 0 f 13 1 d 50__ 2 . 6 1 , x _ - Sq.fl LItililie.S: Saver_Y_g_S_ Legal Description Gas. ---Y Other_ Piat — llarcel(s)_. Taxes S --Q= Due and pay,,, District Outstanding balance on special assessments S in year=9 � E 3 - Outstanding ass'unt. S I Type Space and Other Tenants Floor I Sq. Ft. Ceiling Height Floor Load ENCUMBRANCES: — ------------- 1st Illorigage 2nd Moo to ac;e or C/D Balance Per Mo. PI at "I Interest .1 . _ payable S . — 0 Other financing ---- payable S--- Per Mo. PI Dt — % Interest T E R &'IS: - ic�er Bldv lt , Fe. r L Address?,2' Pim utry L 9 COMMERCIAL MULT1111 I — f; Coeval'!, N1111, ' S[JIVICF (C A S Elf the 1 CJ fg41 '11,1,1 MI IATI(lo,j I r'll UM: Ell 1111 114 Area board (of [h- A t "ollf 1 0 Joel Ill He IN IfA" I,(,, A',!, VI mile w: nNi, Y 1141 011MAY1111.1 1111 0F19 AIM 14 "1' It (IF APPLICATION FOR ' x�sTnvxAN1- �xvtr /oitc�xt��z�srSNSr< 3me of Applicant c 11 �• �+�C G L� /IC Idress of Applicant )me Telephone Number / ime of Business 4 cs e d '7 Cnd of Business fVr7�9ec 'G![ - / I — Ol .�i, Z ✓ isiness Telephone Number agal Description of property on / which business will be operated v ,pproved by City Health Department on the i proved by City Clerk on the day of day of 19 APPLI :CATION FOR CIGARETTE AND TOBACCO LICENSE � Name of Licensee VC -N /JC �, C��, C// ' / C- Business Name of Licenses Business Address of Licensee %G � l r Telephone Number AS TO LOCATION OF LICENSE: Business Name Business Address Telephone Number j Approved by the City Council on the day of Approved by the City Clerk on the day of Fee Paid $ D Receipt No, A9 19 I CITY OF MAPLENOOD , 13£0 Frost Ave. rSaplewood, Minnesota 55109 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE COIN OPERATED AMUSIMENNT DEVICE J IE OF APPLICANT � cr> /K INESS NAME cy -( � - v ATION OP DEVICES -7'—iLkP "0 C' Z'4- 4 CRIPTION OF EACH DEVICE TO BE INCLUDED tll Oct, I achnowledge that I have read the ordinance pertaining to the licensing of coin rated mechanical amusement devices, and agree that I will noY permit the use of these -- Lees on my premises for gambling in any manner. �SIGNATUI2I. 21I -A&i'L'iC' T CC !IPT N0. ��s*�vnr..•.taar. n�. rar ?m. t .. - e-n ., r -rrm:r �n,ar^+� .�.M,<mmnrc,»w.nn mw,M ».,,,..�.M..n.,. w . .. .. Y+ „xmtt` ^'°?) ^. "'a,t^6-• ^f�'„>- "- /.' l trYm'aVn;>�{t7; n..>r+�+no 9.....,�•- 0 NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to action by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, a public hearing will be held on the 5th day of October, 1978, at 7:45 P.M., in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, 1380 Frost Avenue, to consider the application of the following individual for a 3.2 Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor license: Jerald D. Engevik 1555 Randolph St. Paul, Minnesota 55105 such license to be located at the Maplewood Tap (formerly 7- Eleven Store), 1690 English Street Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109. The Council is proceeding in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinances. Such persons as desire to be heard in reference to this matter will be heard at the time and place as indicated. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Lucille E. Aurelius, Clerk Maplewood, Minnesota Publish: Maplewood Review, October 4, 1978. r I ........ ..- .ro�.r ° ti �l p People notified of hearing for 3.2 beer license at 1690 English Street: Richard D. Hopkins - 57 01510 030 51 1700 English St. 55109 Patrick M. & Susan L. White - 57 01510 050 51 1706 English Street St. Paul, Mn. 551.09 Albert R. Wood 1718 English St. 55109 - 57 01510 150 51 Tony L. & Lois A. Oswald (owner of three properties - 57 57100'181 01; 1700 Rosewood N. 55109 57 57100 190 01; 57 57100 200 01.) Willard H. & Elmira Helen Swanson 1685 English 55109 - 57 01610 040 85 Dorothy & Leor. Scharffbillig 1697 English Street 55109 - 57 01610 050 86 Earl & Adeline Ranniger 1699 English Street 55109 - 57 01610 060 86 Gladstone Baptist Church 1717 English Street 55109 - 57 01610 020 87 ^r -- - - - - -- Y - -- - - - - - -- - ...._... -- - - -- G CHECK` A M O U N T C L A I M A N T L9 600. 0 - PUS MAS�ET2 -i � 602954 602.00 R OBERT E VORWERK `L E ------- D A'TE - - iQ 05 78 1 _ P U R P O S E TR AVEL + TR AINING 002955 04.00 MN REC + PARKS ASSOC TRAVEL + TRAINING 0 "2956 840.OU MAPIEWCO�RFIL�L� TSSN V------ f"T"�S� SETcVTCE -- FALL SOFTBALL 002957 224.00 WINDSOR TRAVEL TRAVEL + TRAINING 002950 3.00 3M BPSI M135620 SUQOLIES, OFFICE -- 002967 e 203.20 - -- KOZLAKS ROYAL OAK REST - GALS - GETAWAY -- -- FEES, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY SI62 95� -� �+t Tom' - TAN R[eC� P A aIC�AS�OC — ��Fs9 sERVrOE - - - -- ' 002970 �� 15,000.00 EASTERN HGTS STATE BANK TOUCH FOOTBALL 002960 9,504.00 METRO WAS CO NTROL COMM S.A.G. PAYABLE 002973 5,051.59 CITY + CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION DED PAYABL 002961 160.95 JAN EHLERS TRAVEL + TRAINING 002962 1,530.47 STATE OF MINNESOTA 5,170.C2 SfiAT 0E MTNWF80' -A CONTRTBUTIONS,P._TIREMEN AND- CONTRIBUTIONS,RETIR P ; A a IIEff - f�Ci YATiL� AND- CONTRI3UTIONS,RETIR 002.9 94.00 TAYLORS FALLS CANOE RENT FEES, SERVICE -- 002967 e 203.20 - -- KOZLAKS ROYAL OAK REST - GALS - GETAWAY -- -- FEES, SERVICE GALS GETAWAY 2969 x 002969 826.00 50.10 S S P FOOMA7LU NATIONW PAPER TOUCH FOOTBALL SUP EQ 002970 �� 15,000.00 EASTERN HGTS STATE BANK FED INCOME TAX PAYABLE 0 0 2 Q 71 00 2972 10 ,� 145.00 — I£i IFJ Nom, O MN�� - f? E Vc`NU� RAMSEY SUPPO + CO LLECT — MiT1N - TA7 C H E - TAX - IAA `PAtSL _ WAG DED UCTIONS PAYABLE 002973 5,051.59 CITY + CTY CREDIT UNION CREDIT UNION DED PAYABL ITY OF MAPLEWOOD A C C 0 U N 7 S P A Y A B L E DATE 10 -05 -78 PAGE 2 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E 2974 390,51 MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 UNION DUES PAYADLE AND -FAIR SHARD FEES PAY 002975 1,244.40 GROUP HEALTH PLAN INC HOSP INSURANCE PAYABLE AND- CONTPIBUTIONS,INSUR 00 ?_976 12.00 RAMSEY CTY CONCILIATION A/R - COURT FEES 002977_ 63 1.79 CONN G ENERA L INS CO CONTRIBUTIONS,INS _ 0'02978 111.11 CONN GENERAL LIFE INS CO CONTRIBUTIONS 00 ?.979 159.00 MN BENEFIT ASSOC HOSP INSURANCE PAYABLE 00298 66. AFSCM LOCAL 1056 UNION DUES PAYABLE 09,2981 449.34 AFSCME LOCAL 2725 UNION DUES PAYABLE �- -_ AND -FAIR SHARE FEES PAY 002982 149,C36.90 LANGER CONST CO AWARDED CONST CONTRACTS 002983 100.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE INS CO HO SP INSURANCE PAYA3L� 002984 525,78 MINN COMM OF REVENUE FUEL + OIL 002985 M 986 987 35 500.00 EMP BENEFIT CLAIMS FEES, SEPVICE DENTAL INSURANCE DEPOSIT 300.00 MP BENEFIT PLANS INC FE *S, CONSULTING DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN 147.00 GEOFFREY OLSON TRAVEL + TRAINING 208,226.86 NECESSARY EXPENOITURFS SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING 'n -rt �rs: - 4- is ft e 7 a---an r c--_.-_.-� CHECK° A M 0 U N 'T C L A I M A N T i 7544 72.18 ACE. HARDWARE P U R P O S E SUPPCIFS MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 027545 360.94 AIR COMM REP. + MAINT., RADIO -7556 -- - - 8 - - - - - -- -- 027546 7.65 AMOGO�TL CO — - F[ItL + 6IC - -- 027547 362.30 AFNALS AUTO SERVIC REP. + MAINT V EHICLES 027548 409.26 AUTOMATIC VOTING MACHINE REP. + MAINT., EOUIPMEN 527549 93.60 CHAPLIN PU C O -ESv C_ONS ULTING 02.7550 5.75 BERG- TORSETH INC E SPORT�AklI 027559 PLAVEHICLES 027551 90.80 V H BLACKINGTON + CO UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 027552 1 �(SARO OF - 4_iTT R - C GYM - - OTHT_R CONSTRUCTrO - N - COS AND- AWAP..DED CONST CONTR LINWOOD AVE, CNTY RD D & ARI 027553 ' 55.45 0 KINw —FRD!O — SU PRO 86.00 BULLSEYE INC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 027555 42.99 ANTHONY G CAHANES UNIFORMS + CLOTHING -7556 -- - - 8 - - - - - -- -- 3 07 �APT1bL STITfPCY CO hTAMF_NANC M_XTTRTAL 0 2755 7 694.40 CAPITOL ELEC INC REP. + MAINT., RADIO ANT1= RF P 9� - T17CINT : , — FQ 027558 93.60 CHAPLIN PU C O OTHER CONSTRUCTION COST NCKNIGHT ROAD- ADVERTISING 027559 11.16 COAST TO COAST STORES MAINTENANCE MATTRIALS 027560 -- 59.40 CDM ITIE AL AFFT4 EZyZJIis SU PCZ�S� PF<UG REAM - - ___ 0 27561 187.60 COPY EQUIPM IN C REA. + MAINT., EQUIPMEN 0 27562 6.53 CROSSROADS F ORD SUPPLIES VE HIC LE 027563 11.98 LARRY CURE SUPPLIES, VEHICLE ;I7V OF MAPLEWOOD A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10 -05 -78 PAGE 4 CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 564 4.21 DENNIS S CUSICK TRAVEL + TRAINING ) 7 127565 1 27.96 OALCO CORP SUPPLIES, JANITORIAL 027566 4.80 DISPATCH PIONEER PRESS SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBERSHI - ANO- SUPPLIES, EQUIPMEN1` 027567 - - -- 77.50 DYNA -MED INC --- _ - - - -- SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 02 7568 55.2 IGO V FEJOA OTHER CONSTRUC C O S T TREE INSPECTION (MILEAGE) 027569 150. ?0 FGP.EMAN + CLARK UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 027570 122.97 FOREMAN + CLARK UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 027571 6 5.2 2 G ENUINE PARTS CO SUPPLIES, VEHI ANO °REP• + MAINT., VEHI 027572 3 .75 GOODYEAR SERVICE ST REP. + MA INT., VE HICLE S' 027573 75.20 GOPHER SHOOTERS`SUP'PLY C A/R MISCELLANEOUS ANO- SUPPLIES, EQUIPMEN1` 02757t, 38.46 HILLCREST GLASS CO MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND -REP. + MAIN"T., VEHI P27575 49.01 HOMELITE SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT - -- -- -- --------------- FEE'S, SERVICE RECORDS STORAGE OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE 576 50.16 HOWE MOVING CO 577 363.00 HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMIN + 027578 027579 0 27 580 12.20 HOWIES LOCK + KEY SERVIC SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND °SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 45.99 INTL BUS MACHINES CORP 169.97 i<Cl'Nl I -AIRE MFG _C_ O 1,7 50. 84 KIRKHAM MICHAEL SUPPLIES, OFFICE - -- --- - - - - - -- - - - - -- E - QUIPM OTHER OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE 027582 171.70 KOPY KAT INSTANT SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 027583 154.08 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOC FEES, SERVICE LEGALCCUNSEL M.A.M.A. 'ITY OF MAPLFW00D LION BROTHERS CO INC UNIFORMS CHECK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E ^ 7584 4,847.32 LATS METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM REN SEW PUBLISHING AND - LEGAL + FISCAL AND -LEGAL + FISCAL - - -- -- - - LEGAL COUNSEL 027595 - -- t)n.00 LAKE SANITATION --- - - - - -- — Ffi =S. S = VLC -- 89:33 MARE 81TS IT�TFSS�'�FfS�h7G ----- STJFFC.T:E�, aFFIC�=: - -- 027601 TRASH REMOVAL 027586 32.50 RICHARD J LANG SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 027587 136.76 LION BROTHERS CO INC UNIFORMS 4- CLOTHING 027588 9,349.CA MAPLEWOOJ SEWER + VA'tff2 — 7fWCiRD D COAST CaNYTtA - Cfi 027589 52,553.38 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM REN SEW ' 12.7590 25.75 MIDWAY TRACTOR + EQUIP C FUEL + OIL 927595 tf'n 7596 4.00 30.00 MINN SIf= FROi C�UfJCfiL MN REG + PARKS ASSOC SUI3SCRZF'7r S#H$:- MBFR�H SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBERSHI 027591 32 .95 - �CLLEn CLb I F1INC -- -- �NTFORM CCaTHTN� -- 027592 123.76 MPLS STAR + TRIBUNE CO PUBLISHING 027593 70.40 3M COMPANY - NQT5483 MAINTENANCE MATERIALS AND -REP. + MAIM'., VEHI 027594 4.95 MINN STATE THE ASSURER BOOKS + PEERIODICALS 927595 tf'n 7596 4.00 30.00 MINN SIf= FROi C�UfJCfiL MN REG + PARKS ASSOC SUI3SCRZF'7r S#H$:- MBFR�H SUBSCRIPTIONS +MEMBERSHI 027597 1,415.00 MIRACLE EQUIPMENT GO CONSTRUCTION, OTHER AND -LAND IMPROV ----- - - - - -- -- - --- - -- TENNIS COURTS 027598 560.013 WINFIELD A MITCHELL FEES, SERVICE AND -LEGAL + FISCAL - - -- -- - - ' - -- LEGATE COUNSEL' ' - ' - ' -- 027599 780.]30 MOGREN BROS LANDSCAPING LAND IMPROVEMENT -- D27601? - --- -- 89:33 MARE 81TS IT�TFSS�'�FfS�h7G ----- STJFFC.T:E�, aFFIC�=: - -- 027601 589035 MOTOROLA INC R EP. + MAI R ADIO 027602 1.98 CLIFFORD MOTTAZ TRAVEL + TRAINING CITY OF MAPLF..W000 A C C O U N T' S P A Y A Q L F OATS 1q °05 -78 PAGE 6 CHECK` A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 604 -- VOID - - -- 638.61 CITt/ OF NORTH ST PAUI. °°° VOID °_ -- A/R MISCE 605 . 71.76 NCRTHEPN STATES POWER CO UTILITIES 027606 210.20 NQRTHWESTEPN DELL TEL CO TELEPHONE TRAVEL TRAINLM 027607 2.24 LAVERNE NUTESON 027608 8,883.32 ORFEI + SONS IN AWARDED CONST CONTRACTS1 02.7609 7.00 WILLIAM F PELTIER TRAVEL + TRAINING 027610 235.23 RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER OTHEP CONSTRUCTION COST PUBLICATION & DATA PRO CESSI 0 57'. THOMAS RASMUSSE 07HE P CONST RUCTION COST 027620 25.9 ST PAU RcNT -ALL TREE INSPECTION (MILEAGE) 027612 16.80 DALE E RAZSKAZOFF TRAVEL f TRAINING 027621 94,80 - S & T Office Products, Inc. SUPPLIES, PROGRAM - - - 027613 -- 6.16 - SU�'PLIES, OFFICE 02761 60.9 R CHARLE ROSSLE OTHER CONSTRUCTION COS v SUPPLIES, VEHICLE TREE INSPECTION (MILEAGE) 027615 * 265.00 SATELLITE SERVICE CO FEES, SERVICE __ __ - C CHEMICAL TOILETS 027616 187.22 A ________ SCHAOT tRAVEL + TRAINING sm" 617 1.359.66 T A SCHIFSKY + SONS INC MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 027618 2 SETTER LEACH + LINDSTROM OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE! 027619 36.90 CITY OF ST PAUL REP. + MAINT. , RADIO 027620 25.9 ST PAU RcNT -ALL RE NTAL, EQU IPMENT 027621 94,80 STEICHENS SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 027622 529.03 SUPER _ AM ERICA v SUPPLIES, VEHICLE A ND -FUEL + OIL 727623 36,83 SUPERAMERLCA SUPPLIES VEHICLE 02762 3.25 SUPE RINTENDENT OF O OCUM BOOKS + PERIO 027625 653.13 W J SUTHERLAND + ASSOC OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE - - - - - -- - 027626 --------------------------- 83.Oq -- --------- - - - - -- - 1'A!3ULAT'ING SERV UUP,EAU _ - - - - - --- FEES, SFPV�GE DATA PROCESSING Tr Y O - F - - M A F 0 0_- -- --- --- a - -C - -O - 11 -TT p- A- ,7- -A - --T - L- - -- - p ATE --- JU p 5e Tg -- :P A G_ 7 CHECK` A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E 628 209.11 TERRACE AUTO SUPPLY CO 027629 62.32 RALPH THOMAS CHEVROLET JUr�L1CJ, LUUXF'la.Sl SUPPLIES, VEHICLE AND � REP . 1; --- M XI NT , -- VENI REP. + MAINT., VEHICLES 027630 14.00 TWIN CITY FILTER SERV IN SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT - - - -- - 027631 5.25 TiIN CITY TESTING + OTFIEk fiONSTl2U�YIO�V CdST CONCRETE CYLINDER MOLDS 027632 161.25 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 027633 409.35 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 027635 213.54 VALS BODY SHOP REP. .q. MAINT., VEHICLES 027636 118.00 VIDEO MIDWEST INC REP. + MAINT., EOUIPME' _ 02707 1 8 4. O J VT IZT NU__ NO U S fR ITiC - ? E f1 f R - - -- SUMP CI 'S EDTJTPT 027638 25. 25. WEB ER + TROSETH INC SUPOLI�S, VEHICLE -` - -- - - -- - - - - - -. - - - -- - - - AN O- SU PFLTr 5 9 FUUTPMENT 639 1 1102. 55 CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE ACCTS PAYABLE - MISC ANU =FE =S9 SFTrtITC� - - -- DATA PROCESSING 0276 +40 98.00 XEROX CORP XEROX 027641 2.18 JCSEPH A ZAPPA TRAVEL + TRAINING 027642 027643 101.05 6.00 JOSEPH ROBERT L ZW GORKE - RAP. µ TTAIRT'; RA0I0- SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027644 12.57 ROBERTA OLSON SUPPLIES, PPOGRAM 027645 - - 9.G� JOAN N S0E3�ING - -- SALIES + - WAG'T ilP_ 0 2764 6 3 5.65 DOROTHY ARDORE SALARIE WAGES TEMP. ^027647 - 36.80 EVELYN I AXDAHL - — SALARIES + WAGES, TEMPI ;ITY OF MAPLEWO'00 ------------ A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10-05-76 PAGE 8 CHECK'S A M 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P 0 S E ' 7646 36.80 JAMES BALL + WAGES, - TEMP, 2 76149 41.40 DORIS L 3ROAOY SALARIES + WAGES, TEMD. 027650 37.95 SYLVIA BROWN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. -3-4.5 027651 KAREN BURTON SALARIES + WAGES, P.- 027E52 40_25 LUCILLE CAHANES SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027653 39.68 MURIEL CARLSON SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 02F6 - 54 36 . 8 EN DITTLE KATHLEEN E SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 027655 5 AUDREY ELLIS SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027656 36.80 PHYLLIS ERICKSON SALARIES + -- +W -- A - G - =- - S WAGES, TEMP. 027657 37 1 S FASTfJER SALARIES 027658 40.25 LORRAINE FISCHER SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027659 36.23 DELORES FITZGERALD SALARIES + WAGES, TTMP, 6 - 5 --- ml - A - R - CE L L A - F - L - A - Y SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP, 45.90 AIIN FOSBURGH -- SALARIES -+ WAGES ... .- TEMP. 027662 40.25 RITA FREEDERICKSON SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027663 39.68 RO - GOOSSEN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027664 36.23 VIOLET GUTTERMANN SALARIES + WAGFS 027665 40.25 BUTY HAAS SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 827666 -- 43 - o - 3 - 5JCANNE A HAFNE SALARIES + W AGES, TEMP. 027667 40.25 JEANETTE HAGS SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027668 36.80 WNMAN HAGEMAN SALARIES + WAGES, TE'AD. 027669 41.40 MARlYS HARTMAN SALARIES +' WAGES, TPfjp. 027670 39.68 MILLIE HAUGEN SALARIES + WAGES, U 027671 34.50 BEA HENDRICKS SALARIES * WAGES* TEMP. I _. __— _ 8T OF MAPLEW666 LL- 0 - L� -� -T S -R - A- y- A -B -L- - --- nAYr 1Ce�rg 78 -RAG - -n CHECK` A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E ` f I'I Yu.LI HIYIVM llVul -IV JHLHIl1 LJ `" 19H11L.J, It.I - .I i 7673 37.95 MARY JOHNSON SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027674 36.80 EMMA KELDE SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. + WAGES, TEMP. 0�7�f31 027682 0276788 34.5F, 02 "1675 45.90 027679 - - a� --- l_AG' - S9 _T _M Po 027676 37.95 MARY LI9HAROT SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027677 34.50 MARY LOU LIEDER SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 0�7�f31 027682 0276788 34.5F, MAZ1T ( -. — MATHEWS T W AGESv - TEMP; 027679 36.23 JOYCE LIPINSKI SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027680 44.63 DELORES LOFGREN SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 0�7�f31 027682 �9� 45.90 TiYkTCE ELANOR MAZ1T ( -. — MATHEWS - -- SALARIES SALARIES - - WA "GESe + WAGES, T_FC - . TEMP. 027683 40.25 v 'iff7684 - - f.TS 7685 49.73 MIRCELLA M MOLOHAN .SEAN MY ERS SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. s AinRrts �WA - r_��Fo SALARIES + WAGES, T:: °MP. 027686 36.80 .JOHN NICHOLS SALARIES +r WAGES, TEMP. - 62768 027688 35. - 65 40.25 -- C6RTFATNF 030NNEL� - SARA OLESON - - SALARIES WICGES9 SALARIES + WAGES, - TEMP, TEMP. 027689 36.23 MAXINE OLSON SALARIES + WAG=S, TEMP. nZ769t7 - -- 35 �Ii'T1FL-C7.•Ti__� fi H AMPS ON - - - -- — 5711 ARI - ES -+ - W AG ES-s TEMF. 027691 41.40 LO£RAINE SCHNEIDER SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP.' 027692 24.23 ILIA S7_CZ- PANSKI SALARIES -+ WAGES, TEMP. ' 0 [ 7�3� - -- - - T+S . Siff -- �Ii'T1FL-C7.•Ti__� fi H AMPS ON - - - -- — 5711 ARI - ES -+ - W AG ES-s _TET1 F ; 027694 37.38 MAPJORY TOOLEY SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027695 40.16 CAPOLINE WARNER 11 SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP] CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 35.00 A C C 0 U .N T S P A Y A B L E DATE 10- •05 -78 PAGE 10 CHF.CK* A M O U N T C L A I M A N T P U R P O S E — MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 027733 37.38 - -- MICHAEL T WASILUK —� SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 27697 35.C8 ELSIE WIEGcRT SALAR + WAGES, T "MP. 027698 35.65 JANIS WILKINS SALARIES + WAGES., TEMP. 027699 44.63 MARGARET WOLSZON y SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027700 37.95 M KATHLEEN 7APPA SALARIES + WAGES, TEMP. 027701 35.00 MRS JUDITH AEGERTER A/R - PARAMEDIC 027702 317.75 ARMCO STEEL - - - -- — MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 027733 199.80 AUTO RE NU REP. + MAINT., VEHICLES 027704 270.00 BATTEN BATTEN HUDSON TRAVEL + TRAINING 027705 28.42 JOSEPH BARD FEES, SERVICE ARBITRATORS FEE M.A.M.A. 027706 60.00 BLOOMINGTON FIRE DEPT TRAVEL + TRAINING 027707 7.00 NEIL BOREEN R E F U N D CANCEL SOCCER 027708 ?_3,3413.23 BLUMELS TREE +LANOSCAPTNG AWARDED CONST.COWTR 7709 5.8 JIM CHRIST PO NTIAC REP. + MAINT., Vc'HI 327710 0 ?.7711 105.00 COMMUNITY EDUCATION 216.20 JOHN R OUBOIS 13.66 FORESTPY SUPPLIERS INC FEES, SERVICE SUPERVISORY STAFF PERSC FEES, CONSULTING RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SY SUPPLIES, OUIPMENT 027713 10.00 ERNEST GOODRICH A/R - PARAMEDIC X027714 48.00 TOM GOULOINH SUPPLIES, PROGRAM 027715 39.12 H G HENEMAN JR FEES, SERVICE 027716 25.50 HILLCREST CAR WASH 027717 509.00 HOFFMAN C ORNER OIL. 027718 6.00 MAURICE HUGHES 027719 324.38 KELLY SERVICES ARBITRATORS FEE M.A.M.A. REP. + MAIN7.b VEItICLES R E F U N D CANCEL FEES, SERVICE TEMPORY HELP 721 54.12 L P D ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 027722 230.80 MAPLE HILLS GOLF CENTER SUPPLIES, PROGRAM ANO-FEES, SERVICE INSTRUCTION 027723 28.42 STEVEN RUTZICK FEE- SERVICE ARBITRATORS FEE M.A.M.A. 183 12O,887~82, CHECKS WRITTEN 5v3l4"68 * INDICATES ITEM PAID FOR BY DECR8&JI80 FEES / __ &-1111 i . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CHECK REGISTER - PAYROLL DATED 09-29 -78 DATE 09 -29 -78 CHECK NO. CLAIMANT GROSS NET 18656 NORMAN G ANDERSON 225.00 202.82 18657 ROGER F FONTAINE 225.00 165.87 18658 JOHN C GREAVU 300.00 238.96 18659 EARL L NELSON 225.00 210.26 18660 DONALD J WIEGE:RT 225.00 2.04.82 18661 VIVIAN R LEWIS 520.15 357.00 18662 LAURIE L BERGSTEDT 380.77 262.64 18663 DANIEL F FAUST 1,057.65 764.30 18664 ARLINE J HAGEN 621.23 405.97 18665 ALANA K MATHEYS 304.64 222.09 18666 LUCILLE E AURELIUS 987.69 640.21 18667 PHYLLIS C GREEN 582.89 391.47 18668 BETTY D SELVOG 460.15 310.17 18669 LORRAINE S VIETOR 336.46 241.46 18670 JEANNE L SCHADT 76.16 74.38 18671 SANDRA K HIRSCH 682.88 432.37 18672 ALFRED J PELOQUIN 499.87 335.65 18673 - - -- TERRANCE C RILEY - -- VOID -------- 265,65 ------------ 225,47 18674 DAVID L ARNOLD 832.39 506.23 18675 JOHN H ATCHISCN 1,062.23 691.93 18676 ANTHONY G CAHANES 832.72 577.29 18677 CALE K CLAUSCN 923.18 599.58 18678 KENNETH V COLLINS 845.77 546.94 18679 DENNIS J DELMONT 924.08 605.72 18680 RICHARD C DREGER 829.59 560.78 IP681 RAYMOND E FERNCW 821.17 547.76 18682 NORMAN L GREEN 856.15 552.94 18683 THOMAS L HAGEN 999.23 646.70 18684 KEVIN R HALWEG 800.81 507.50 18685 MICHAEL J HERBERT 743.08 467.18 18686 DONALD V KORTUS 303.37 233.00 18687 RICHARD J LANG 767.31 499.77 10,688 JOHN J MC NULTY 886.13 583.24 18689 JAMES E i`4EEHAN JR 782.60 494.87 18690 JON A MELANDER 794.58 503.14 18691 CAN IEL. B METTLER 675.66 460.27 18692 RICHARD M MOESCHTER 901.12 597.02 18693 RAYMOND J MORELLI 848.89 573.46 18694 CAROL M NELSON 533.08 378.76 18695 ROBERT D NELSON 937.98 611.72 18696 WILLIAM F PELTIER 818.30 536.42 18697 - -- -CALE E RAZSKAZCFFL -- VOID ------ 745.39 ------------ 528.47 18698 MICHAEL P RYAN 686.17 460.21 18699 RICHARD W SCHALLER 1,127.62 709.35 18700 DONALD W SKALMAN 949.17 600.37 18701 GREGORY L STAFNE 790.32 509.34 18702 VERNON T STILL 670.62 446.65 18703 CARRELL T STOCKTON 674.90 462.81 18704 TIMOTHY J TRUHLER 746.76 489.53 18705 BRUCE W WEBER 533.08 378.76 18706 DUANE J WILLIAMS 992.94 556.Y0 18707 JAMES G YOUNGREN 779.71 527.40 18708 JOSEPH A ZAPPA 880.78 591.96 18709 CEBURAH A BASTYR 316.62 215.06 18710 GERALD P BENDER 423.69 294.99 18711 JAYME L FLAUGHER 42.3.69 289.33 18712 JOY E OMATH 344.77 246.75 18713 JOANNE M SVENGSEN 431.54 293.89 18714 RONALD D BECKER 827.67 537.09 ' 18715 DENNIS S CUSICK 946.88 619.67 18716 DAVID M 833.54 45.76 18717 ROGER W LEE 1,058.36 679.50 18718 ROBERT E VORWERK 1,046.95 650.56 18719 IRENE H HAWTHORNE 316.62 2.01.03 18720 JAMES M EMBERTSON 576.15 389.36 18721 ALFRED C SCHADT 799.38 546.58 18722 CLIFFORD J MOTTAZ 205.38 167.48 18723 MARCELLA M MOTTAT_. 483.23 342.75 18724 FRANK J SAILER 270.92 211.43 18725 WILLIAM L BITTNER 997.23 702.67 18726 WILLIAM C CASS 809.54 504.31 C7-ECK NUMBER 18656THRU 18767 70xO77.25 46,976.38 PAYROLL DATED 09- 29- -78 18673 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD (265.65) (225.47) CHECK REGISTER - PAYROLL DATED 09- 29 -•78 (745.39) DATE 09- •29 -78 CHECK NO. CLAIMANT GROSS NET 1872.7 JAMES G ELIAS 654.00 430.77 18728 DENNIS L PECK 654.00 431.51 18729 IGOR V FEJDA 511.20 355.52 18730 THOMAS M RASMUSSEN 385.60 311.87 18731 R. CHARLES RDSSLEY 355.20 290.61 18732 WALTER M GEISSLER 637.11 427.58 18733 RONALD J HELEY 462.40 303.93 18734 RAYMOND J KAEOER 539.20 356.38 18735 MICHAEL R KANE 539.20 215.09 18736 GERALD W MEYER 565.36 371.81 18 ARNOLD H PFARR 583.16 .382."2.9 18738 JOSEPH B PRETTNER 874.92 590.73 18739 EDWARD A REINERT 539.20 347.93 18740 GEORGE J RICHARD 539.20 345.03 18741 HARRY J TEVLIN JR 573.28 415.19 18742 RUDOLPH R BARANKO 738.92 455.07 18743 ERIC J BLANK 995.35 672.18 18744 LOIS J BRENNER 431.54 302.92 18745 BARBARA A KRUMMEL 7.76.82 137.25 18746 ROY G WARD 230.77 195.29 18747 PYLES R BURKE 539.2.0 339.32 18748 DAVID A GERMAIN 539.20 349.91 18749 MELVIN J GUSINCA 832.13 526.98 18750 ROLAND B HELEY 569.53 384.47 18751 HENRY F KLAUSING 579.53 407.02 18752 REED E SANTA 569.53 395.11 18753 MEGAN E GANGE 415.20 290.43 18754 JAMES R MCKEE 355.20 272.88 18755 CHRISTINE SOUTTER 355.20 265.66 18756 JUDY M CHLEBECK 460.15 294.81 18757 THOMAS G EKSTRAND 534.99 348.88 18758 GEOFFREY W OLSCN 838.50 557.5?_ 18759 MARJCRIE OSTROM 758.01 497.23 18760 RICHARD J BARTHOLOMEW 559.09 393.84 18761 DENNIS M MULVANEY 579.67 396.15 18762 EDWARD A NADEAU 488.41 339.79 . 18763 LAVERNE S NU'IESON 775.07 512.66 18764 GERALD C OWEN 565.09 378.32 18765 WILLIAM S THONE 559.09 396.24 18766 MICHAEL T GREEN 304.00 254.0+ 18767 GARY 0 SPENCER 528.80 368.88 C7-ECK NUMBER 18656THRU 18767 70xO77.25 46,976.38 PAYROLL DATED 09- 29- -78 18673 TERRANCE RILEY- -VOID CHECK (265.65) (225.47) 18697 DALE RAZSKAZOFF- -VOID CHECK (745.39) (528.47) 18768 TERRY A HOLT 708.04 494.14 18769 JEFFREY 0 MELANDER 26.92 26.92 18770 JAMES T HORTON 129.23 119.51 18771 TERRANCE RILEY 138.75 125.95 18772 DALE RAZSKAZOFF 1029.66 735.07 1.8773 LEOTA D OSWALD 460.15 302.60 18774 M. PAULINE ADANIS 562.62 378.35 - x x X-TOTALS 72 48,404.98 :n,P%-�,.', MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DATE: Request Mayor and City Council Acting City Manager Lot Split Harry Schmokel 1630 N. Sterling September 29, 1978 / - -a- The applicant requests approval to redivide two lots into three lots. Existing Land Use 1. The westerly half of the subject property is developed with a single family dwelling. 2. The subject property consists of two equal sized lots each measuring 93 by 224.11 feet. The two lots combined have 186 feet of frontage on Idaho Avenue nad 224.11 feet of frontage on Sterling Street. 3. The subject property has an area of 41,684 square feet or .96 acres. Proposal 1. The applicant proposes to create three lots. Proposed Lot A is developed with the existing dwelling. The lot is to measure 106 by 144.11 feet and have an area of 15,275.66 square feet. 2. Proposed Lot B is to measure 80 by 144.11 feet and will have an area of 11,528.8 square feet. 3. Proposed Lot C is to measure 80 by 186 feet and will have an area of 14,880 square feet. Planning Considerations 1. The subject property is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Residential. 2. The Land Use Plan designates that this area develop as RL, Low Density Residential. lic Works Considerations Sanitary sewer and water are available from Sterling Street and Idaho Avenue. Analysis The proposed split creates three lots which all conform to City standards. There are adequate setbacks provided for the existing house in proposed Lot A. Staff has no problem with recommending approval of this proposal. Reco mmendation Approval of the proposed lot division. A.cti.on by Council; Endorsed---- modif ied-- jjejected -m Date... ----- NORTH ST PAUL 1 1 ] '�.Y AVE. C) U 3 0 I.A PENTEUN — _ ' n } AV 1;1 �. J o < Trailer Court �f MARYIANU AVE MALN01.1A AVE. C� ,�„� I df � 11 N QI dj E, c. a t E. IDAHO T In I � I I l ; F:,, !� 133 I I r.. I I (D I I 1 I I ( 12 1 w I I l I I I ID /I� H �I 1� I 13 I 14 1 15 d vl I I 33 rt 100' I •�- - + _. HARRY SCHMOKEL PETITI LOT DIVISION - � REQUEST 1530 N. STERLING 9- 29 -78� DATE .�� Ls L n "' � ;NN u QI dj E, c. a t E. IDAHO T In I � I I l ; F:,, !� 133 I I r.. I I (D I I 1 I I ( 12 1 w I I l I I I ID /I� H �I 1� I 13 I 14 1 15 d vl I I 33 rt 100' I •�- - + _. HARRY SCHMOKEL PETITI LOT DIVISION - � REQUEST 1530 N. STERLING 9- 29 -78� DATE .�� Ls L I t " 55 LII ri 0 -- -------- ----- Vv I 1530 N. STERLING M-a 9-29-78 DATE' --i SCALE �f'G. �. all J -- / - / ,' MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Lot Division APPLICANT: Voya Piletich LOCATION: Northerly side of Beam Avenue, West of Highway 61 DATE: September 19, 1978 Request The applicant requests approval to divide a 20 acre parcel into three lots. Existinq Land Use 1. The subject property is presently undeveloped. It has been extensively worked as a mining operation. 2. The parcel is irregular in shape. The parcel has 819.74 feet of frontage on Beam Avenue. The east 180 feet front on a full 66 foot wide right -of -way. The remainder of the frontage fronts on a half right -of -way of only 33 feet. Beam Avenue is paved, but in substandard condition. Proposal 1. The Applicant is proposing to divide two lots off of an existing "L" shaped parcel. The third lot would be the balance of the property. 2. Proposed Lots one and two will both be buildable residential parcels, each measuring 75 by 150 feet and having areas of 11,250 square feet. 3. Proposed Lots one and two are two parcels of a future plat for the entire property. 4. The enclosed section map shows a 50 foot easement along the westerly lot line of lot two, which also covers the westerly 20 feet of lot two. The Applicant has indicated that this easement no longer exists. S urrounding Development Northerly: Largely undeveloped land and scattered single family dwellings along County Road D and Carey Heights Drive. Southerly: Beam Avenue and single family dwellings. Easterly: An undeveloped 25 acre parcel, used for agriculture. Westerly: An undeveloped 21 acre parcel. 1 Past Act ions March 2, 1972: The City Council moved to approve a.Special Use Permit for excavating purposes for the subject parcel, with the following conditions: 1. Finish slopes of a minimum of 5:1 shall be required. Actual slopes adjacent to property boundaries shall be determined at a later date. Excavation in this area is not permitted under the current permit. 2. Minimum slopes of 3:1 shall be required for the completion of individual excavating permits. 3. Each individual excavation permit shall designate the area and total acreage to be excavated, and the duration of the permit. 4. The owner shall be the permittee for each individual excavation permit. 5. The owner shall secure a Village excavator's license. 6. A performance bond shall be posted for each excavation permit to insure conform- ance to these conditions and those specified in the excavation permit during the term of such permit. 7. In the case of transfer of ownership of all or any part of said property, the new owner or owners shall agree to the conditions of the permit in writing prior to the transfer of the special use permit to the new owner or owners. 8. No signs shall be posted on the property advertising the sale of material. 9. The Village Council may revoke the permit at anytime based on the violation of these conditions. 10. The hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. 11. Beam shall not be utilized for hauling traffic unless upgraded to an appropriate level. 12. The owner and permit holder shall abide by all state, federal and county regulations regarding pollution and open pit excavations. 13. Any time excavation is not to be performed for a period of thirty days or more, all equipment shall be removed from the site. 14. The permit holder shall give immediate notice to the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners of intent to excavate and request comments in regard to pollution of Kohlman Lake. The permit holder will comply with County requirements to control pollution. 15. Any violations brought to the attention of the permit holder and not corrected within a reasonable time as determined by the Village may result in loss of permit. 2 16'. There shall be no explosive detonations of any kind on the site. 17. Only excavators licensed by the Village shall engage in actual excavation operations. 18. The permit holder shall prepare a plan for the current year's operation which must be approved by the Village in accordance with applicable Village ordinances prior to any excavation. All excavations will be in accordance with this plan and no deviations will be allowed without prior Village approval. In the absence of a properly approved plan the following shall apply: only existing sidewalls shall be used for excavations and the base of the pit shall not be expanded, (it is the intent of this provision that the permittee be allowed to excavate only that material necessary to bring the existing excavations to the minimum of 5:1 slopes). 19. The special use permit to be issued for three year period with yearly review by Council, with Council having the right to terminate said permits. 20. The special use permit shall only be granted upon compliance with the above conditions. The permit applicant shall indicate•by his signature that he has read and understands the conditions of the special use permit and that it may be revoked upon noncompliance. May 18, 1972: The City Council moved to approve an excavation plan for the special use permit in compliance with condition No. 18. April 4, 1974: The City Council moved to renew the excavation permit for the third and final year subject to the original conditions. August 22, 1978. The Applicant recorded a deed with Ramsey County to divide the original 40.33 acre tract into two parcels, Parcel I and Parcel II (see map). This division did not require City approval. Section 462.358 Subdivision 4 (3) of the Minnesota State Statutes permits the division of property without City approval if the new lots each are larger than five acres in size and have widths of not less than 300 feet. Planning Considerations 1. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan has designated that this property develop as Rm, Medium Density Residential. 2. The subject parcel is zoned F, Farm Residential. 3. The proposed lots meet or exceed Code requirements for minimum lot area or width. Public Works Considerations 1. Neither sanitary sewer or water is available to the subject property. 2. Beam Avenue is proposed to be realigned as a minor collector from Highway 61 to Little Canada (see enclosed Land Use Plan) 3 I Ana lysis The primary concern with this split is not to restrict the alignment of a future Beam Avenue. Beam Avenue is proposed to be realigned as a minor collector to Little Canada. Staff feels that houses on proposed lots 1 and 2 would not affect this realignment. A house on lot 3 may cause a problem in realigning Beam Avenue. Building permits, therefore, should be withheld on lot 3, until a plat is recorded that establishes the alignment. The Applicant should provide proof that the 50 foot easement has been eliminated so not to limit construction on lot two or future development on lot three. In order to avoid "piece- meal" development of the rest of this property, no further splits should be allowed without platting. Recommendation Approval of the proposed lot division, provided that: 1. Proof that the 50 foot easement has been vacated is submitted to Staff. 2. A deed restriction is recorded to_run. with the property, stating that, - "No further splits shall be allowed on proposed lot 3 without platting the property ". 3. A deed restriction shall be recorded to run with proposed lot 3, stating that, "No building permits shall be issued, until a plat is recorded designating the future alignment of Beam Avenue ". Act:wn by Council :'. Yndor ed____._.-__.- modi£ied__ -- Itejcctcd_..� . -- 1 ?'ate___.._ 4 1 ry BEAM AVENUE WEST OF HIGHWAY 61 a 9A. 33') m l 1 _ _ —Ai �L l� �I 0 Co? a a m n o � 8 m V y 651F1Yd • IJn, J I 35nc I 1 Y I�iJ•1, dI' I I 29„ I pJ ' 2U.9 A". a %-c- r- I T-1.1 40.33 tea. 25. 16v . i i; i, L 61 �F.Dges¢si �:v:SiO.V L:YT1' r I '/ I I m N 1D-0 � t 4. I II I BEAM AVENUE WEST OF HIGHWAY 61 E 19 -7II TE SCALE LP G CERVAIS A LAKE ma I 7Zr fninor arterial I R I I 111 x cz lti 0 r J 0 " ' CA CA :;major coil. 0s X nxti 1, �q I minor collector p.lz ICI - RM j , r JJJ lector I � — -- — TE, , arterial t.Minte r v Imo`' f E— FBEAM AVENUE WEST OF HIGHWAY 61 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Lot Division APPLICANT: Virginia G.Drewry LOCATION: 2660 Linwood Avenue DATE: September 27, 1978 MEMORANDUM Request The Applicant is requesting approval to divide the existing parcel into three parts. Existing Land Use 1. The existing lot has 660 feet of frontage on Linwood Avenue and 295.71 feet of depth or 4.48 acres in area. 2. The subject property is developed with a single family dwelling, garage, and barn on the north end (see enclosed map). Proposal 1. Lot 1 would have 130 feet of frontage and 145.705 feet of depth or an area of 18,941.65 feet. 2. Lot 2 would have 100 feet of frontage and 145.705 feet of depth or an area of 14,570.5 square feet. 3. The balance of the property, including the existing house, would be the third lot. Sur rounding Land U ses 1. The properties to the east and west are developed with single family, dwellings. The property to the east was split into three lots in 1973. 2. The property to the south is undeveloped land. 3. The property to the north, across Linwood Avenue, is the site for a St. Paul Police Department pistol range. Most of this land is planned for Park and Open Space use. Past Actions 1. 7- 19 -73: The Applicant applied for a four lot split on the subject property (see enclosed map). Staff recommended denial on the basis that it: a. Contradicted City policy; b. It was premature in that needed utilities and services were not available; c. It was an attempt to avoid proper planning in subdivision of the area. Based upon this recommendation, the Applicant withdrew her request and submitted a plat. 2. 11- 29 -73: A preliminary plat was reviewed by the Council, which included the proposed lot split and additional lots to the east. After Staff and Planning Commission recommended denial, the plat was withdrawn by the Applicant. Planninq Considerations 1. The Land Use Plan has designated that this property develop as RL, Low Density Residential. 2. The subject property is zoned F, Farm Residential 3. The proposed lots would meet or exceed minimum Code requirements for lot area and width. Public Works Considerations Water and sanitary sewer are not available. Park Considerations 1. The west two - thirds of this property are designated for Open Space on the Maplewood Park and Open Space Study. The City, however, has no money available for the acquisition of this property. This property is not designated for Open Space on the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Future plats for the subject property trail between the proposed park land developments to the south. should anticipate a possible north -south to the north and future residential Analysis The primary concern with this, as well as most lot splits, is to avoid the develop- ment of frontages that may eliminate future road access to the interior properties. Staff feels that a major north -south collector street will be needed through the subject property. We do not know where this street will intersect Linwood Avenue. The Planning Commission has recommended that major collector streets be provided every quarter mile. The quarter section line in this case coincides with the Applicant's west property line. Staff, however, cannot be sure that the quarter section line is best suited for the road. There are steep contours and wetlands in this area that affect road location. We also do not have a proposed plat for the area. No further land division should be allowed on these properties, until an overall plat is submitted that includes a feasible location for a north -south collector. In order to preserve the option of a north -south collector on the quarter section line, the width of lot one has been set at 130 feet. This would allow us to acquire half a street right -of -way (30 feet) and leave 100 feet of lot frontage for a corner lot. A deed restriction should be required to assure the minimum side yard setback for a corner lot (30 feet). Recommendation Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. A deed restriction shall be recorded with proposed lot 3 stating that, "No further lot splits shall be allowed on this property. further land divisions shall only be allowed with a plat. 2. A deed restriction shall be recorded with proposed lot one stating that, "The setback from the west property line (quarter section line) shall be 60 feet." Ac i.on. l,y; Cr,!anol7. 3dod I j. Da `\ s C Q F U v VIRGINIA. G. DREWRY 2660 LINWOOD AVENUE PETITIONER LOT DIVISION REQUEST 9 -27 -78 DATE L SCALE jPG. --------- -- vez 63 -- 90 11 ,� �. 1� n O .. � .. I r! 01 :L fo IJ apt my 989.7t ,:,�.�... �� ) !, O.S � €� BAG 4;s Fi,'ei S 5' C A D t? rt:. � . 'VA0 ac, 41 0 46 IGo OI 5. /N. YW L F t: N t--R 15U fl of �tn 4 01 u \9 N VIRGINIA G. DREWRY PETITIONER LOT DIVISION REQUEST 9-27-78 DATE [SCAL E j L IM" MW,: � M c. r.• �`' 1 C I e e s LO t oo 1 T 3/O 300 L T / � � O/ � 3 t 1 Y D 1 . i 1 3 1 r N 9 Y I i f 9 4 A5" Bo' Br' 3.81 or. 94E3�.. A.KUe GFN6R N (fool "v' A Kurt= � -l�cr� IS o) a I - AVE 2660 LINWOOD AVENUE I w 1009. VIRGINIA G. DREWRY PETITIONER LOT DIVISION REQUEST 9 -27 -78 D DATE �. ,J SCALE p, �'C• MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Final Plat LOCATION: Maryland Avenue, West of Ferndale Street APPLICANT: Brandt Engineering Company PROJECT: Maple Greens DATE: September 27, 1978 The applicant is requesting approval of a final plat for the Maple Greens Third Addition. The City Council approved the preliminary plat on July 20, 1978, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the design and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage system for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions by the City Engineer, before final plat approval; 2. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the City Council orders the construction of Sterling Street; 3. If the Council orders Sterling Street to Maryland Avenue, Outlot C shall be shown as a dedicated public right -of -way. If Sterling Street is terminated at East Rose Avenue, Outlot C shall be omitted and the property combined with Lots 31 and 32 of Block 1, Maple Greens Third Addition; 4. Outlot B shall be redesigned to include only the west 20 feet. The remainder of the property shall be incorporated into block 6, lots 6 and 7; 5. The portion of Outlot D from the northwest corner of lot 15, block 1 westerly to Outlot C shall.be incorporated into lots to the south; 6. All outlots shall be dedicated to the City; 7. Approval of written documentation, such as by -laws, and articles of incorpor- ation, for the homeowner's association before final plat approval. Such document- ation shall clearly define responsibilities for property and utility maintenance, utility billings and assessments. Such documentation shall be recorded so as to run with each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. If dedication is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non - profit organization to be devoted to such similar purposes. 8. Approval of easements for drive access and utilities to each lot. Such ease- ments shall be recorded to run with the land. 9. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed Board. 10. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. 11. Owner and applicant agree to the above in writing. _. 11 As of the writing of this memo, the applicant has not submitted the final hard - shell or completed conditions necessary for final plat approval. The applicant has stated that all of the conditions will be met by the time of the City Council meeting. lie, therefore, requested that he be placed on the agenda. Since the Plat has not been submitted and the conditions have not been met, staff recommends that this item be tabled until the above items are completed. If this work is completed by the time of the City Council meeting, staff will have a further recommendation at that time. FE _._ r r; ,a1 E""" ncted Da t; 0-- ;lnance now in effect in the City of Bloomington. The obvious advantage of this type of ordinance is that it greatly speeds up the administrative procedure for granting minor. variances. At present it takes almost 3 to 3'1/2 months to process even a minor variance application. This can certainly prove frustrating for a home owner who is not familiar with the normal administrative procedures at City Hall. An ordinance of this type, would certainly help to maintain good public relations with the average resident of Maplewood. If a resident is unhappy with the staff decision, he still may appeal. his case through the normal administrative channels. Staff recommends approval of the proposed ordinance. c. Commissioner Fischer presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: " Commussioner Sherburne suggested adding under Section 913.020 between items 1 and 2 the word "or" on a separate line; also add "or" on a separate line between 2 and 3; between 3 and 4 add "and" on a separate line; in Section 913.030 replace "sub- mitting the" with "receipt of an "; eliminate the words "and providing the City ". Section 913.040 second paragraph "A right to this 'appeal shall be 'made' known'; Section 913.020 insert "certain" between "grant" and "variances ". Commissioner Sherburne moved approval of the proposed amendment to the Administra- tive Variance Ordinance. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes all. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the Administrative Variance Ordinance as amended by the Commission on May 15, 1978. Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes all." d. Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. g. Councilman Wiegert moved first re ading o f an ordinance to amend the to allow administrative arantinn_ of variances as recommended by the Pla Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all.. 4.. Subdivision - Preliminary Plat - Maple Greens P.U.D.- 8:00 P.M. a. Building and Site Plan 1. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed subdivision of land known as Maple Greens P.U.U. The Clerk read the notice of hearing along with the dates of publication. 2. Manager Miller presented the staff reports and recommended approval of the preliminary plat for Maple Greens Third Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the design and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage system for the Third, rourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions by the City Engineer, before final plat approval.; - !{ - 6/15 2. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the City Council orders the construction of Sterling Street; 3. if the Council orders Sterling Street to Maryland Avenue, Outlot C shall. be shown as a dedicated public right -of -way. If Sterling Street is terminated at Last: Rose Avenue, Outlot C shall be omitted and the property combined with Lots 31 and 32 of Block 1, Maple Green Third Addition; 4. Outlot 13 shall be redesigned to include only the west 20 feet. The remainder of the property shall be incorporated into Block 6, lots 6 and 7; •5. The portion of Outlot D from the northwest corner of lot 15, block l westerly to Outlot C shall be incorporated into lots to the south; 6. All outlots shall be dedicated to the City; 7. Approval of written documentation, such as by -laws, and articles of in- corporation, for the homeowner's association before final plat approval. Such documentation shall clearly define responsibilities for property and utility maintenance, utility billings and assessments. Such doc- umentation shall be recorded so as to run with each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. If dedication is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non- profit organization to be devoted to such similar purposes; 8. Approval of easements for drive access and utilities to each lot. Such easements shall be recorded to run with the land; 9. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board; 10. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed by the Comprehensive Plan; 11. Owner and applicant agree to the above in writing. Approval of the preliminary plat for Maple Greens Fourth, Fifth and Sixth additions, subject to the following conditions: Lots 57, 53 and 67 shall be designated as outlets; The two proposed parks shall be designated as outlots and deeded to.the City; Approval of the design and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Addit- ions by the City Engineer, before final plat approval; The final plat shall not be approved, unless the Council orders the con- struction of Ferndale Street (north of Maryland Avenue) with the Fifth Addition and Marylake Road with the Sixth Addition. Dedication of rights -of. -way for these streets shall be shown on the final plat in accordance with Council approved plans; The final plat for the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions shall not be approved, unless the Council orders the necessary facilities (such as water tank or booster station) to supply adequate water pressure to the proposed buildings. The Fourth, Fifth or Sixth Additions may be approv- ed if the City Engineer determines that there is adequate water pressure for one or all of the plats; A second means of access shall be provided with the Fifth Addition from Maryland Avenue through the parking lots for the south apartments to Ferndale Street extended. Necessary easement shall. be submitted to the City Attorney before final plat approval to assure that such access shall remain available and will be maintained all year Ion,; Approval. by the City Attorney of written documentation, such as by-- laws and articles of incorporation, for the proposed homeowner's assoc- iations before final plat approval.. Such documentation shall clearly - 5 - 6/15 4 1 . 2. -. 3. - -- -- 4. 5. 7. Lots 57, 53 and 67 shall be designated as outlets; The two proposed parks shall be designated as outlots and deeded to.the City; Approval of the design and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Addit- ions by the City Engineer, before final plat approval; The final plat shall not be approved, unless the Council orders the con- struction of Ferndale Street (north of Maryland Avenue) with the Fifth Addition and Marylake Road with the Sixth Addition. Dedication of rights -of. -way for these streets shall be shown on the final plat in accordance with Council approved plans; The final plat for the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions shall not be approved, unless the Council orders the necessary facilities (such as water tank or booster station) to supply adequate water pressure to the proposed buildings. The Fourth, Fifth or Sixth Additions may be approv- ed if the City Engineer determines that there is adequate water pressure for one or all of the plats; A second means of access shall be provided with the Fifth Addition from Maryland Avenue through the parking lots for the south apartments to Ferndale Street extended. Necessary easement shall. be submitted to the City Attorney before final plat approval to assure that such access shall remain available and will be maintained all year Ion,; Approval. by the City Attorney of written documentation, such as by-- laws and articles of incorporation, for the proposed homeowner's assoc- iations before final plat approval.. Such documentation shall clearly - 5 - 6/15 4 I define responsibilities for property and utility maintenance. Such doc- umentation shall be recorded so as to run with each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for :which this Association was created. If dedication is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non - profit organization to be devoted to such similar purposes; 8. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed Board; 9. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed by the Comprehensive Plan., 10. Owner and applicant agree to the above in writing. Approval of the revision to the original Planned Unit Development to allow quad units to be built in the part: of the area previously designated for RL, Low Den- sity Residential use, and recommended tabling of the building and site review, to allow time for the applicant to make the changes suggested in this report.. The revised plan should incorporate the following changes: North and South Apartments Concrete curbing around all parking lot perimeters 10 foot wide stalls and striping Fire lanes, as required by the Fire Marshal 120 square foot per unit of interior storage space (section 916,.D40) Trash - dumpster location and masonry or brick screening (wood does not hold up) Sidewalks between buildings and parking Landscaping plan Parking lot lighting (security) Townhouses 22 foot wide garages Concrete curbing around all parking lot perimeters 10 foot wide open parking stalls Landscaping Plan Quad homes 22 foot wide garages Restaurant 15 foot parking lot setback Building elevations There shall be a north -south trail system and walks to each ¢7evelop:ment,. 3. Commissioner Fischer presented the following Planning Commnission re-ca mnenda.tio:n:: "Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend ,to the '.City Council that although the proposed preliminary plat meets the denisty .and intent roi the approved Planning Unit Development, it is recommended for cloaty -ake That the RL and Rm boundaries along the South end be realigned to reflect the type (ol structures proposed in this plat. Commissioner. Pellish seconded. Ayes all. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend t¢> tt!Lce city dio,uneil - 6 - 6115 a approval of the preliminary plat for Maple Greens 'third Addition subject to the fdllowi.ng conditions: 1. Approval. of the desi.gn:and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage system for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions by the City Engineer, before final. plat approval; 2. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the City Council orders the construction of Sterling Street; 3. If the Council orders Sterling Street to Maryland Avenue, Outlot C shall be shown as a dedicated public right -of -way. If Sterling Street is terminated at Rose Avenue, Outlot C shall be omitted and the property combined with Lots 31 and 32 of Block 1, Maple Greens Third Addition; 4. Outlot B shall be redesigned to include only the west 20 feet. The remainder of the property shall be incorporated into block 6, lots 6 and 7; 5. The portion of Outlot D from the northwest corner of lot 15, block 1 westerly to Outlet C shall be incorporated into lots to the south; b. All outlots shall be dedicated to the City; 7. Approval of written documentation, such as by -laws, and articles of incorpor- ation, for the homeowner's association before final plat approval. Such documentation shall clearly define responsibilities for property and utility maintenance, utility billings and assessments. Such documentation shall be recorded so as to run with each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. 8 . Approval of easements for drive access and utilities to each lot. Such easements shall be recorded to run with the land; 9. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board; 10. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed by the Comprehensive Plan; 11. Owner and applicant agree to the above in writing. Approval of the preliminary plat for Maple Greens Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lots 57, 53 and 67 shall be designated as outlots; 2. The two proposed.parks shall be designated as outlots and deeded to the City; 3. Approval of the design and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions by the City Engineer, before final plat approval; /t. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the Council orders the construct - ion of Ferndale Street (north of Maryland Avenue) with the Fifth Addition and Marylake Road with the Sixth Addition. Dedication of rights -of - -way for these streets shall be shown on the final, plat in accordance with Council approved plans; 5. The final plat for the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions shall not be approved, unless the Council orders the necessary facilities (such as water tank or booster station) to supply adequate water pressure to the proposed buildings. The Fourth, Fifth or Sixth Additions may be approved if the City Engineer determines that there is adequate water pressure for one or all of the plats; 6. A second means of access shall be provided with the Fifth Addition from Maryland Avenue through the parking lots for the south apartments to Ferndale Street extended. Necessary easement shall be submitted to the City Attorney before final plat approval to assure that such access shall remain available and will be maintained all year long; 7. Approval by the City Attorney of written documentation, such as by -laws and articles of incorporation, for the proposed homeowner's associations before final plat approval.. Such documentation shall clearly define responsibil- ities for property and utility maintenance. Such documentation shall be - 7 - 6/15 recorded so as to run with each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropriate publ.i.c agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. If dedication is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non - profit organisation to be devoted to such similar. purposes; 8. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed Board; 9. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed by the Comprehensive Plan; 10. Owner and applicant agree to the above in writing. Commissioner Pellish seconded. Ayes all." 4. Chairman Huot presented the following Community Design Review Board recommendation: "Chairman Iluot moved the Board recommend to the City Council they table the building and site review for the Maple Greens Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions to enable the applicant to incorporate the revisions suggested by staff into the plans. Board Member Sjolander seconded. Ayes all." 5. Mr. Steve Oman, Century Land Co., the applicant, spoke on behalf of their. proposal. 6. .Mayor Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. 7. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. The following voiced their opinion: Mr. George Everett, 971 Sterling Avenue, representing Maplewood - Ferndale Association; Mr. Mach Yeagle, 1084 Sterling Avenue; Mr. Larry Olson, 2666 Geranium Street; Mr. Ray Kaeder, 1073 Sterling Avenue. i 8. Mayor Greavu closed the public hearing. 9. Councilman Nelson moved to table the matter of the building and si plan as recommended by the Community Design Review Board and that the applicant make p rovision for not extending Sterling Avenue to Stillwater. Road and looking into a roadway coming from the north. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 10. Mayor Greavu_mov to approve the M aple Greens preli.minar subject to the Planninr_ Commission recommendations. Seconded by Councilman Fontaine. Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilman Fontaine. Nays - Councilmen Anderson, Nelson and Wiegert. Motion failed. 11. Councilman Wi.egert mov to reconsi th previous motion. Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 12. Councilman Anderson moved to table t h e l inp_l . e Gree_ns_ Preliminary P la t until JULY 20 3.978 and at t hat t ime the ro ad ne twork question s hould be resolved -8- 6/.15, Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 5. Refuse Collection Rates - 8:00 P.M. a. Mayor Greavu convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed increase 9.n. refuse collection rates as requested by Lake Sanitation. The Clerk read the notice of hearing along with the dates of publication. b. Manager Miller stated staff received a request from Take Sanitation to provide for an increase in monthly refuse collection rates as follows: Type Pr esent Pro posed %Increase Curb $ 4.50 $ 5.00 11.1 Walk -in 6.20 7.00 12.9 Metered (Curb 50 bags) 22.50 25.00 11.4 The Maplewood Code provides that the Council may increase maximum allowable rates for pick -up aftor a public hearing preceded by a ten day published notice. The present rates were established by the Council on May 12, 1977. At that time rates were increased between 12.5 and 13.7 percent over the previous rates which were established in August of 1975. The staff checked with the City of White Bear Lake regarding their rates under a contract pick -up situation, White Bear Lake is just completing a three year contract for curb pick -up at $3.40 per month. In August, the City will undertake a new con- tract for the next three years at $4.28 per month. The staff feels inadequate in attempting to justify or to recommend denial of the proposed rate increase. It is felt that we have no way of determining the justify- ability or nonjustifyability of such an increase. Maplewood has a number of licensed refuse collection companies which compete on the open market for customers. It is felt that unless such competition is drastically reduced, the City should not regulate rates. It is therefore recommended that the Maplewood Code be amended to eliminate Council review of rates for pick -up services. c. Mrs. Mary Ayde, Lake Sanitation, spoke on behalf: of the request. d. Mayor. Greavu called for proponents. None were heard. e. Mayor Greavu called for opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor. Greavu closed the public hearing. I g. Councilman Anderson moved to a pp rove the followin ncrease in the refuse collect ion rates: Type Curb Rate $5.00 per month Walk -in $7.00 per month Metered (curb - 50 bags) $25.00 - 9 - 6/15 Seconded by Councilman Nelson. Ayes - all. 3. Land Use Plan Amendment - Gross vs. Net Acres a. Acting Manager Blank presented the staff report. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: "Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council they amend the definition of net acreage in the land use plan to gross acreage less the acreage designated for public rights -of -way for street's or walkways. Gross Acreage shall be defined as the total residential acreage of the develop- ment including those facilities normally associated with the residential develop- ment such as streets, private open space and drainage facilities. Commissioner Rishel seconded. Ayes all." c. Councilman Anderson move introduced the following res 78 -7 -138 WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council and the Maplewood Planning Commission have prepared and adopted a Comprehensive Community Plan in compliance with the requirements of Section 462.355 of the State Planning Enabling Legislation; and WHEREAS, said Section 462.355 provides for subsequent amendment of said Comprehensive Plan which reflect changed conditions; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood Planning Commission has conducted the required public hearing and has given consideration to all evidence and testimony submitted at such hearing held on July 17, 1978 and has adopted said amendment and forwarded said amendment to the City Council for certification; and WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has reviewed said amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Maplewood City Council hereby adopts and amends the Comprehensive Plan for Maplewood. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 4. Feasibility Report - Maple Greens Area a. Mr. James Orr, Schoell and Madsen, presented the feasibility report. b. Following discussion, Councilman Nelson moved to table this matter u ntil August 3, 1978. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 5. Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) - Maple Greens P.U.D. a. Acting Manager Blank presented the staff report. b. Mr. Steve Omon, the developer spoke on behalf of the request. C. Councilman Wiegert moved appr of t Ma ple G reens 3rd Addit Prelim Plat subject to condltions aizd — el at the 74:h, 5th and 6th Additions be tabled. r 7 - 7/20 �, d. Councilman Wiegert withdrew his motion. e. Councilman Wiegert mo ved a revision in the Maplegreens.'Planned Unit. Development to allow quad units to he built in part: of the a rea previously dvsLgnated for :;inl;:ie fa mes and WI L an am e nd ment to the Com Plan be approved to change the - area as descr from RL -Iu dens residential use to 5"Nedium Density Resid ential_ Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. use. f. Councilman Wiegert moved approval of the preliminary plat for Maple Greens 3rd Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. 1. Approval. of the design and construction phasing of the proposed storm water ponds and drainage system for the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Additions by the City Engineer, before final plat approval; 2. The final plat shall not be approved, unless the City Council orders the construction of Sterling Street; 3. If the Council orders Sterling Street to Maryland Avenue, Outlot C shall be shown as a dedicated public right -of -way. If Sterling Street is ter- miniated at East Rose Avenue, Outlot C shall be omitted and the property combined with Lots 31 and 32 of Block 1, Maple Greens Third Addition; 4. Outlot B shall be redesigned to include only the west 20 feet. The re- mainder of the property shall be incorporated into block 6, lots 6 and 7; 5. The portion of Outlot D from the northwest corner of lot 15, block 1, westerly to Outlot C shall be incorporated into lots to the south; 6. All outlots shall be dedicated to the City; 7. Approval of written documentation, such as by -laws, and articles of in- corporation, for the homeowner's association before final plat approval. _ Such documentation shall clearly define responsibilities for property and utility maintenance, utility billings and assessments. Such documentation shall be recorded so as to run,Vith each affected property. Should the Association be dissolved, it's assets shall be dedicated to an appropri- ate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which this Association was created. If dedication is refused, the assets are to be transferred to some other non - profit organization to be devoted to such similar purposes. 8. Approval of easements for drive access and utilities to each lot. Such easements shall be recorded to run with the land. 9. Obtaining a permit from the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board. 10. Overall densities shall not exceed those allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. 11. Owner and applicant agree to the above in writing. Seconded by Councilman Fontaine. Ayes - all. g. Councilman Wiegert move t o table the preliminary p lats of M apl e Greens 4th, 5th and 6th Addition ^� .Seconded by Councilman Fontaine. Ayes - all. A 6. Zoning Code Ordinance - Density - Adoption _. a. Acting Manager Blank presented the staff report. - 8 - 7/20 . MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FRONT: Ac't'ing City Manager SUI3JECT: Review of Proposed DATE: August 31, 1978 Park Improvements Enclosed is a letter and maps describing proposed park improvements by Ramsey County in Keller and Battle Creek Parks. State law requires that the Planning Commission review all capital improvements for consistency with the Plan. Section 462.356, Subdivision 2 states "After° a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recom- mended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special district or agency thereof or any other po- litical subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital impr:,vement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its find- ings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Failure of the planning agency to report on the proposal within 45 days after such a reference, or such other period as may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this subdivision. The governing body may, by resolution adopted by two- thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan." Copies of the Land Use Plan are enclosed. All of the properties designated by the County for improvement are planned for OS, Open Space on the City Land Use Plan. Parks, playgrounds, golf courses, lakes, and trails are all consistent with the OS designation. Recommend Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposed park improve- ments for Keller and Battle Creek Parks are consistent with the City's Compre- hensive Plan. kojrn t_ Date . .._._.._. , ...._.. -...,. f hJ " RARRBEY COUNTY PAI'MS &OPEN SPACE DEPARTMENT 2010 White Gear Avenue Telephone (G12) 770.1361 L-01A sncouurr St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Bernard L. Edmonds, Director August 2.8, 1978 Mr. Geoffrey Olson, Director Dept. of Community Development City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: The Metropolitan Council has allocated some development funds for Regional Parks in Ramsey County. Two of these Regional Parks, Keller and Battle Creek, are within the City of Maplewood. Ramsey County is required to obtain the approval of the City Council for development plans. Therefore, I request that the Maplewood City Council approve the develop- ment concept for Keller Regional Park and that part of Battle Creek Regional Park within the City of Maplewood. Enclosed are the development concept map, a description of the development proposed, and the C.I.P. Our staff will be available to make presentations to Boards or Commissions as required. Sincerely, Bernard L. Edmonds Director of Parks and Open Space BLE:ama Enc. rSS ® \ , \ } \ 7 \ . \�\ \\ ƒ- / \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \\3a owes ¥& _a2E BATTLE CREEK REG IONAL PARK DE VELOPME NT MAP LEWOOD The existing picnic area northeast of Upper Afton and McKnight Road will be improved as a group picnic area. Proposed development for this area in- cludes: a new access road with curbs and blacktop surface; new parking lot with curbs and blacktop surface and lighting and landscaping; a group picnic pavillion with water and restrooms; hiking and bike trails connecting to other areas of the park; and large open fields for informal games. The area east of McKnight Road between Upper and proposed to be developed as a hiking /cross Country sk been used as a snowmobile area in the past. This use In addition to the hiking /cross - country ski trails, a through the area. Underpasses will be constructed tin and McKnight Road to make access to these trails from part: safe. Lower Afton Roads is 1 area. The area has will be discontinued. bike path will pass ier° Upper Afton Road other parts of the The Watershed District is proposing to construct a ponding area on _- - - - -.- Battle Creek upstream of McKnight Road. This ponding area will be incorpor- ated into the plan for the group picnic area. ST. PAUL The existing downhill ski area on Winthrop Street will be improved with an emphasis on providing a good lesson and beginner ski area with minimal physical development or changes. A broad range of winter sports will be in- cluded in the area. A sliding hill, skating area, and cross - country ski facilities will be incorporated in the plan. Specific improvements for the downhill ski facility will include a warming house, one additional lift, additional snowmaking, resurfacing the existing parking lot, and minor grad- ing on the slopes. New picnic areas will be developed on the bluff between Battle Creek Road and Highway 61. Hiking /cross - country ski trails will connect with the Maplewood Section of the park. kaV FIVE -YEAR DEVELOPMENT PLAN BATTLE CREEK 1 11 Estimated 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Cost Buildings $ $ $ $ S S Group Picnic (1) 41,250 41,250 Family Picnic (15) 66,825 22,000 22,000 22,825 Comfort Shelter (7) 198,000 44,000 44,000 22,000 88,000 Maintenance Garage 88,000 88,000 Pavinq Park Roads 190,080 55,000 22,000 44,000 44,000 2.5,080 Interior Parking 110,000 55,000 22,000 22,000 11,000 Trails Hiking 12,320 2,200 •2,200 3,520 2,200 2,200 Creek Bridges (5) 44,000 22,000 22,000 Road Tunnels (3) 132,000 44,000 88,000 Picnic Sit 33,000 11,000 5,500 5,500 11,000 Util Sewer 92,400 33,000 33,000 26,400 !dater 61,600 22,000 22,000 17,600 - Lighting 8,800 2,200 4,400 2,200 General Reforestation 27,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Boundary Controls 55,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Ski Rehabilitation 973,500 973,500 Sub -total $ 2,134,275 '1,277,G50�) $ 112,200 $ 414,920 $ 140,525 S 188,980 Contingency (10%) $ 213,428 (igU 21hlSI� Consultants (10 %) $. 213,428 TOTAL $ 2,561,131 1 11 N existing a «� w , b c k in W9� y n Proposed d'ONICI�Gpmein Co,ceps KELLER.-PlIALFiN RIEWON rn:lc. bb cc dd d'ONICI�Gpmein Co,ceps KELLER.-PlIALFiN RIEWON rn:lc. K ELLER REG PARK The development plan for Keller Regional Park is primarily one of improv- ing the existing facilities. Keller and the adjoining Phalen Park are con- sidered one Regional Park, therefore, the plans for the two parks are coordi- nated. This coordination will be evidenced by a continuous trail system and complimentary facilities. A major aspect of the redevelopment plan is the proposed changes in the roads through the park. When the Frost Avenue Connector is built it will be possible to remove the road along Keller Creek. New parking lots will be constructed for the picnic areas. Other im- provements for the picnic areas will include; restrooms, water, picnic shelters, grills, etc. A bike path will be constructed along the Creek. This path will connect to the exsiting paths - in Phalen Park. Two bridges will be constructed over the Creek to allow bikers and hikers to cross. An arboretum is proposed for the Luebben Property between Keller Lake and Arcade Street. The arboretum will include plantings of a large variety of trees and shrubs. Walking paths will go through the arboretum and connect to the other parts of the park. �� y PIVG -YEAR OUFLOPMrNT PLAN KE'LL.R- PHALFN OZAMS COUNTY SFCTIO Item Park Roads (3'200') Parking (175 stalls) Bike Path (2 miles) Walking Path (2 miles) Walking Trails (3 miles) Foot Bridges (3 -100' bridges) Foot- Maint. Bridge -(1-100' bridge) Arboretum Development Arboretum Fence (2900') Picnic Shelters (10) Picnic Sites (25) Toilets (4) Planting Site Gradinq Gates and Signs Sub -total Contingency (10 %) Consultants (10%) TOTAL Estimated Cos 56,320 38,500 44,000 22,000 6,600 82,500 44,000 55,000 19,140 44,000 4,125 52,800 22,000 55,000 11,000 $ 556,985 $ 55,699 $ 55,6 $ 668,383 1978 $ 56,32.0 38,500 22,000 2.7,500 44,000 1979 1980 1981 1982 $ $ $ S 22,000 22,000 6,600 27,500 27,500 :5,000 19,140 - -- 22,000 22,000 4,125 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 27,500 27,500 11,000 31,220 $ 113,740 $ 72,325 $ 67,100 $ 72,600 Ffjop l> IN(TV, WIN. jl� I7 Ci ili? III � �' � t�i txY . ` u t l.,l. ��'.'1'vl� I �. � I �C,: s 1 f � \ 1 ,�., LJ ........ ..... ej Ci o i, D I] Liz u] c- Cf .. ! CI" ;nU y I1 C,< - D I 29 0G rs Fj E D rr -, pp( V1 1 1( 72 ' A' /\I j) 0 c to 1) 1 VAI co"W'SION . . ... ... . y I1 C,< - D I 29 0G rs Fj E D rr -, pp( V1 1 1( 72 ' A' /\I j) 0 c to 1) 1 VAI co"W'SION iN G III al, /',�,�I} I I VVI Gfl;nwe �( —�., t - , �(- - - ;j _,.I�' +'r 1� - J _� , I -.l—, i , , 1 �.1 i� , _ , ;f �Gd - X, Maj r C vlIC h I A I �� ,_� {JJ L. L. }J I I I _ I I fl/ f` 1 ' I I f i ,/ :� J J . 11 1,1 0 Collect / r /'S - 1 t' � iatilf -I� I t7`- ! II � � f, -.; .,. , /(/ I &Io � ;, �C� ,., Z Ali ............... v) aj 0 r al all �>m'(�'T ^Yn n'1wV �'� 0 D Pa r L si u` o } Err Er. 1 , B S� 1"'!ri. 'ji r, L P1 1 D U S I'- P L A 1 1] DAI F: MAPLU'DOD PU1111111146 Cu!AJ,'SJQ.;1 V_q T' flli � I . .. ..... . —Sk 1 lvetJ minor col I c cl�orir P. 4F III. V. - I ) I }I Lt ; L I J ---- T -11 --- - ------ major c o l l e c t o r -7— --f-7 f Tp Sh.rwood Men III IIII( vq o I (I UsF Pi ..N rAlt: Uc ober 1- Cu illt, Zt - . . . . . . . . . .. ....... ----- --- - 7 1 J A - j 1 lvetJ minor col I c cl�orir P. 4F III. V. - I ) I }I Lt ; L I J ---- T -11 --- - ------ major c o l l e c t o r -7— --f-7 f Tp Sh.rwood Men III IIII( vq o I (I UsF Pi ..N rAlt: Uc ober 1- Cu illt, Zt .1 C 11 il I I I 1111 it[ WrkAl t ............. .. . . . ...... arip'l L)l r .... di 4 ,; . .... . I _ � I rl 1�i { -i l.L .r. I hY'y�: i. / / /,n, r : ��?m GERVAIS LAKE I i J L o I c 8 11 0 if 0r c o c i 0 r • _l tk ....... ZZ (Z"D 4 7 4' -- A Jl 17 s l i ! I t2. II l,\ I: It i � � ••pp – t�' , � __— # � x. - _ jp W." I , I lecto r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T FT AA I.;: Llz:.l-,,,:��li..,.,.,-,--.-,.",.,;,-;+,�.r. I I � N 1, 2 �' G I TL 1 1.1 ('lv fli'l �L 1 F; L )ATE fl!)I( vv 0 0 J Ill AA I.;: Llz:.l-,,,:��li..,.,.,-,--.-,.",.,;,-;+,�.r. I I � N 1, 2 �' G I TL 1 1.1 ('lv fli'l �L 1 F; L )ATE 1 1.,,. 1i , ,Ir.;1,,... Illl .S...t - , UlBjt ar i' ri"' 1 ..,.,, „.I LA r.av III: i.v!:L nrUP. it E 1; I-fiv II ' UPPI10r, VII III,!. P G fit q I ---------- -- - 1 T 1 1> ar ( J 'I • ,��.��:�,,,.,.til ill G�.::��;1�� : � � °�� wood 13 LAN-D (P(” PLAN WOE /,fIPROVLD:_()C tober 9 1 9 12 CUMISSION 1> ar ( J 'I • ,��.��:�,,,.,.til ill G�.::��;1�� : � � °�� wood 13 LAN-D (P(” PLAN WOE /,fIPROVLD:_()C tober 9 1 9 12 CUMISSION MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1978, 7:30 P.M. 1380 FROST AVENUE, MAPLEWOOD,• MINNESOTA 1 _ CALL TO O g R Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ?._ DOLL CALL Commissioner Lester Axdahl Commissioner Richard Barrett Commissioner Paul Ellefson Commissioner Lorraine Fischer Commissioner William Howard Commissioner Edward Kishel Commissioner Beverly Kroiss Commissioner Joseph Pellish Commissioner Duane Prew Commissioner Kenneth Rossow Commissioner Gary Sherburne Present (Chairman) Present Present Present Present Absent Present Absent Present Present Absent 3. APPR OVAL OF MINUTES A, APPROVA OF AG ENDA Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the agenda as submitted Commissioner Ellefson seconded Ayes all. 5 PUB LIC HEARING A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (OS to Rm) East of Ferndale (Cave) Secretary Olson read the notice of hearing for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Commissioner Howard asked if the applicant would be present at the meeting. Secretary Olson said the applicant was informed of the meeting. Commissioner Howard moved the Commission review B A ''County Park Improvements" at this time and review 5 A "Comprehensive Plan Amendment after that item as the petitioner is not present. Commissioner Kroiss seconded Ayes all. 8. NEW BUSINESS A. Review County Park Improvements Secretary Olson said State Law requires that all capital improvements 1 must be reviewed by the Planning Commission to see if they are consistent with 'the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan has designated the the areas being discussed as OS, Open Space. Parks, playgrounds, golf courses, lakes and trails are all consistent with that designation. Staff,therefore , recommends the Planning Commission find the proposed park improvements for Keller and Battle Creek consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Larry Holmberg, Park Planner with Ramsey County Parks and Open Space, said they will be receiving development funds from Metropolitan Council for regional parks in Ramsey County. The improvements proposed for Battle Creek park consist of improvements to the p'icn'ic area which is located east of McKnight and north of Upper Afton Road. it will be developed into group picnic areas, therefore a pavillion will be constructed. There will be a new parking lot constructed,with the existing access road being surfaced and curbed. They are working with the Battle Creek Watershed on the proposed temporary pending area proposed in the area of McKnight. The area southeast of Upper Afton Road and McKnight south of Lower Afton is currently the area used for snowmobile trails. They propose to eliminate snowmobile trails from that area and develop the area exclusively for hiking trails and cross country ski trails. The area is not adequate in size for snowmobiling. The trails will be connected to the north picnic area by an underpass at Upper Afton Road. He explained the hiking trails and cross country ski trails will continue in to the City of St. Paul and continue throughout the park. Chairman Axdahl asked if the only access from McKnight is just north of Upper Afton. Mr. Holmberg said yes. Commissioner Howard asked if the County was prepared to maintain the park once it is constructed and established. Mr. Holmberg said yes. Commissioner Howard asked what form the trails will take - crushed rock or black top. Mr. Holmberg said the bike trails will be blacktop, the hiking trails and ski trails will be wood chips. Commissioner E-llefson asked if there was plans to expand the park in the future. Mr. Holmberg said there are only three parcels remaining to be acquired for the park and they are all in St. Paul. Mr. Holmberg said Keller Park is a regional park. The plan for this park is for redevelopment and improvement of existing uses. They do not propose any significant new uses or activities for the park. One of the major proposes would be the realignment of roads. The present plans are to construct the Frost Avenue connector from East Shore Drive to Frost Avenue. This would then make it possible to remove the road which runs along the channel whichi connects to both Frost Avenue and Highway 61. This will open up the area along the channel to walkways and bike paths and picnic areas. There will be a new parking lot constructed at the picnic area on the north side of Round Lake and also construction of restrooms. Access to the picnic hill along Highway 61 will be provided from that highway but at a different location from what now exists. r Commissioner Prew asked if there was a walking path proposed to the island at Keller Mr. Holmberg said there is a possibility for a walkway along Keller Lake up to the Island. It is not possible to go further because of the marsh area to the north. It would be beyond this year's program. Commissioner Prew said &cress Points from the parks onto Highway 61 Should be limited because of existing heavy.traffic. Left hand turns from Highway 61 to the park are already a problem. He asked if this had been studied by the County or the State Highway Department. Has consideration been given to better signing to indicate park entrance points. Mr. Holmberg said there has been some discussion. It was felt elimination of the access point close to the bridge would improve the situation somewhat. There is the possibility of eliminating left hand turns. A right turn lane could be installed on the shoulder of the roadway. Commissioner Rossow said if the access is moved further north for the Keller Hill picnic area, it would be located in a high speed zone area, thus creating more of a traffic problem. Commissioner Ellefson asked if there were other altnernatives to the development of the Lower Keller Park area that might alleviate some of the traffic problems, but possibly not as good from a park planning point of view. Mr. Holmberg said there were really no other alternatives because the points of access are very few. Highway 61 is really the only logical access for certain points of the park. Any new locations of access points onto Highway 61 would be subject to the approval of the State Highway Department. Commissioner Howard asked if the County is trying to prevent the further erosion of the banks of Keller Lake. Mr. Holmberg said the Lake Program of Ramsey County Engineer has included some work, not on Keller but on Gervais. If there are major problems, he would presume work would be done, but was not aware of any immediate plans. Commissioner Barrett moved the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the proposed park improvements for Keller and Battle Creek Parks are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Rossow seconded Ayes - all. 5. PUB LIC HEARING (Continued) A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Cave) OS to Rm (Ferndale) .. Secretary Olson said the applicant is requesting that the portion of "his Property designated OS be redesignated as Rm. Staff is recommending approval as outlined in their report. MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Critical Areas Plan DATE: September 27, 1978 The State of Minnesota has required the City of Maplewood to complete a Critical Areas Plan for an 80 acre parcel in the most southwesterly corner of the "leg ". (See enclosed map). The Governor has designated critical areas along the entire length of the Mississippi in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The intent of the law is to provide environmental protection for these areas. The area involved in Maplewood is a largely undeveloped piece, with substantial acreage owned by Ramsey County Open Space. A work program, mandated by the State, is enclosed. We are required to complete this work program by January 1, 1979. Notice that the work program includes both adoption of a plan as well as environmental regulations. Due to limited staff personnel and a heavy work load, this work will have to be done by a consultant if the deadline is to be met. Staff has solicited proposa's from Barton - Ashman and Michael Mularoni Design. The enclosed proposal from Barton - Ashman indicates a maximum cost of $4,000. The proposal enclosed from Michael Mularoni Design stipulates a cost of $3,900. Mr. Mularoni is an independent planning consultant who is presently working for the City of Newport. Since he is doing the Critical Area Plan for that City, he would be in a good position to perform the same service for the City of Maplewood. The City has received a grant of $2,500 from the State of Minnesota to perform this work. This means that a balance of $1,400 will have to be appropriated from City funds. Council has budgeted $4,500 in the 1978 Budget for a planning intern. Due to a lack of available space in City Nall and lack of available interns, the Planning Department will not be able to hire an intern this year. Staff would, therefore, recomm6nd that the Council authorize Michael Mularoni Design to pre- pare the State required Critical Areas Plan for the City of Maplewood at a cost not to exceed $3,900. The money to do this work shall consist of the $2,500 grant from the State of Minnesota and $1,400 from account 4020, which was originally appropriated for a planning intern. , f) I City of Maplewood Critical Area Plan Work Program A. Inventory an Ma ki n g of Critical Are 1. Identify and map slopes between 12% and 18% and over 18 %. . - - I 2. Identify and map significant vegetative stands. B. Plan Preparation 1. Develop policies to manage water runoff. 2. Develop specific policies to protect slopes over 18% and to manage slopes between 12% and 18 %. 3. Develop specific policies to manage significant vegetative stands. 4. Identify potential scenic overlooks and views. 5. Develop plans and programs to acquire sites for public access to the Mississippi and to protect open space areas. 6. Identify existing and proposed regional trail routes. 7. Consider locations for the clustering of high -rise structures, if any, that are consistent with public services and adjacent land uses. 8. Prepare a plan for the staging of services and development, consistent with the Land Planning Act requirements. 9. Describe, designate, and schedule public sewer systems, including areas to be sewered, standards and conditions for the installation, operation, and maintenance of private sewer systems, and areas not suitable for public or private sewer systems. 10. Indicate any existing or proposed utility crossings of the corridor and develop policies and regulations to minimize their impact and concentrate river crossings. C. Redulatior Pre arai:ion 1. Develop the following ordinances for the Critical Area Corridor: a. The protection of steep slopes greater than 18% and the management of slopes from 12% to 18 %, b. Surface water runoff management (quantity and quality), c. Site alteration management, d. Management of existing vegetation and landscaping, 1 e. Site plan ordinance as required by Critical Area Standards and Guidelines, for all development requiring a permit, except the construction or modification of single family structures, f. Ordinances to protect the natural state of bluffs, scenic overlooks, and scenic views, except for uses requiring river access, and g, Amortization of existing non- conforming uses or if more than 50% of the market value is destroyed. 2. Assure that the City has appropriate zoning standards for non - sewered areas. 3. Review the potential for dedication of lands along the bluff line with views of the river. 4. Ensure that provisions and standards for development are consistent with planned land and water uses. 5. Adopt a capital improvement program for public facilities sited in the River Corridor, such as roadways, sewers, park and recreation facilities, and other public capital improvements, including acquisition and develop- ment. 6. Indicate the sequence of actions, costs, and sources of funds to implement this program. U. Public Participation 1. Describe methods and mechanisms to involve citizens in the local River Corridor planning process. 2. Indicate appropriate groups involved in the planning process, represent- ing such interests as environmental, recreation, developers, utility companies, business, and property owners. P,1 pwrrrrcn,� .M1�In Comp Date of Critical Area Planning Critical Area Planning will begin immediately upon approval of the Critical Area Planning grant contract. All work will be completed prior to January 1, 1979 (see enclosed chart) u� I IV] P. T WASHINGTON CO. 1, z n a v 0 0 U. 25) z U U I' z N G 25) I P� CITY OF PIFlPLEWOOD PETITION CRITICAL AREAS GRANT ,FOUEST SOUTH OF CARVER, EAST OF MC KNIGHT ROAD 11 -30 -77 � ..,�.._ „4...! DATE ..� AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed this Third day of October nineteen hundred seventy - eight, by and between Michial Mularoni Design and Planning, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as MMDP), and the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a municipal body organized and existing by virtue of and pursuant to the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as MAPLEWOOD). WI'iNESSETH: WHEREAS, MMDP is engaged in the business of serving as a municipal planning and development consultant; and r WHEREAS, MAPLEWOOD is desirous of developing and establishing MISSISSIPPI RIVER CRITICAL AREA a plan for its municipality; and WHEREAS, MAPLEWOOD is desirous of employing the service of MMDP for the purpose of establishing the MISSISSIPPI RIVER CRITIAL AREA PLAN (hereinafter referred to as the CRITICAL AREA) outlined on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. �ern� -w�.a rnx .rr,.*.,n. ,'m'�mrf;,.R"z ^. _' „'P!s:E ;re m. Frm4^�am+ *7•rwsnx -±aa ,.^� �,m. ca�rr2'tn* wn7y,r € r^,mrn:�+q�e^i5hse'�;:n�'�,rrKt e. % ^:xc�r^�¢ s.,e<g`i'' I s NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows 1. RIGHTS AN DUTIES MMDP. MMDP shall develop and establish a Critical Area Plan as outlined on Exhibit A. 2. TIME OF COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION. The work to be performed by MiIDP under this Agreement shall be commenced upon execution of this Agreement and shall be completed no later than Three (3) months thereafter. 3. CONTRACT SUM. MAPLEWOOD shall pay MMDP for the performance of the services outlined in paragraph number (1) above, the sum of Three Thousand Nine hundred dollars ($3,900.00). In addition to the afore- mentioned sum, MAPLEWOOD shall reimburse MMDP for any and all expenditures made by MMDP in connection with any public hearings pertaining to the services outlined in paragraph number (1) above. All other expenditures made by MMDP will be at no charge to MAPLEWOOD unless the desired number of copies of the Critical Area plan exceeds 19 copies. 1 4. PROGRESS PAYMEN On or before the tenth (10th) day of each and every month thereafter through and including the third (3rd) month Fn following the month of the execution of this Agreement, MMDP shall submit to MAPLEWOOD a written statement specifying the Percent of Completion services performed for MAPLEWOOD by MMDP during the previous month. Within fiwe(5) business days after receiving such written statement, MAPLEWOOD shall remit to MMDP a progress payment of the following amounts: a.) A PERCENTAGE OF Three Thousand Nine hundred dollars ($3,900.00), equal to percentage of completion in the submitted written statement. b.) Eight hundred dollar ($800.00) retainer fee upon execution of this statement. 5. MAPLEWOOVS RESPONSIBILITIES. MAPLEWOOD shall have the following responsibilities: (a) MAPLEWOOD shall provide with reasonable promptness, full information regarding the services to be performed by MMDP that may exceed services outlined on Exhibit A. (b) MAPLEWOOD shall designate, when necessary, a representative authorized on its behalf with respect to the services to be performed by MMDP. (c) MAPLEWOOD shall furnish any information required of it as expeditiously possible for the orderly progress of the services to be performed by MMDP, and Ih4MDP shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. 6. TERMINATION In the event of a default in the performance of this Agreement by MMDP, MAPLEWOOD may give MMDP written notice of its intention to terminate this Agreement. Said notice shall specify in detail the specific defaults of MMDP. In the event that MMDP fails to cure the 2 ty rcl�rzr' I specified defaults within ten (10) days after receipt of said notice, this Agreement shall become null and void. 7. ASS IGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns, provided however, the parties hereto shall not assign this Agreement without first obtaining the written consent of the other Party. 8. E XTENT OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement represents the entire and intregrated agreement between MMDP and MAPLEWOOD, and supersedes all. prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. Work completed is to become the property of MAPLEWOOD. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by both MAPLEWOOD and MMDP. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MMDP and MAPLEWOOD have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. MICHIAL MULARONI DESIGN & PLANNING Its r R, It -- I/(r lI I }L CITY Or MAPLEWOOD W Its . - T77 .,d 4 EXHIBIT A Exhibit A attached to and made .part of that certain Agreement by and between MMDP and MAPLEWOOD date the Third day of October 1978. A. Inventory and Mapping of Critical Area 1. Identify and map slopes between 12% and 18% and over 18 %. 2. Identify and map significant vegetative stands. B. PLAN PRE PARATION 1. Develop policies to manage water runoff. 2. Develop specific policies to protect slopes over 18% and to manage slopes between 12% and 18 %. 3. Develop specific policies to manage significant vegetative stands. 4. Identify potential. scenic overlooks and views. ' 9. Develop plans and programs to acquire sites for public acess to the Mississippi and to protect open space areas, 6. Identify existing and proposed regional trail routes, ]. Consider locations for the clustering of high -rise structures, if any, that are consistent with public services and adjacent land uses. 8. Prepare a plan for the staging of services and development, consistent with the land Planning Act requirements. 9. Describe, designate, and schedule public sewer systems, including areas to be sewered, standards and conditions for the installation, operation, and maintenance of private sewer systems, and areas not suitable for public or private sewer systems. 10. Indicate any existing or proposed utility crossings of the corridor and develop policies and regulations to minimize their impact and concentrate river crossings. C. REGULATION PREPA RATION 1.. Develop the following ordinances for the Critical Area Corridor: a. The protection of steep slopes greater than 18% and the management of slopes from 12% to 18 %, b. Surface water runoff management (quantity and quality), c. Site alteration management, d. Management of existing vegetation and landscaping, e. Site plan ordinance as required by Critical Area Standards and Guidelines, for all development requiring a permit, except the construction or modification of single family structures. 0 EXHIBIT A cone. f. Ordinances to protect the natural state of bluffs, scenic overlooks, and scenic views, except for uses requiring river access, and g. Amortization of existing non - conforming uses or if more than 50% of the market value is destroyed. 2. Assure that the City has appropriate zoning standards for non- sewered areas. 3. Review the potential for dedication of lands along the bluff line with views of the river. 4. Ensure that provisions and standards for development are consistent with planned land and water uses. 5. Adopt a capital improvement program for public facilities sited in the River Corridor, such as roadways, sewers, park and recreation facilities, and other public capital improvements, including acquisition and develop - ment. 6. Indicate the sequence of actions, costs, and sources of funds to implement this program. D. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1. Describe methods and mechanisms to involve citizens in the local River Corridor planning process. 2. Indicate approprate groups involved in the planning process, represent- ing such interests as environmental, recreation, deveoplers, utility companies, business, and property owners. 9 .. .. Ra t on ^J'\ .L�.v�fumv,an A:v oc0aate. Pne. v .o,i i...uui - IUVG 1UU, IUIV JUUl11 DIX L11 DTleer, Ivunnoapons, lwinn. bx)W /4 Vl2 - 042 ' September 27, 1978 Mr. Geoffrey Olson, Director Community Development City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: Barton- Asehman is pleased to submit this proposal to prepare a Critical Areas Plan for an 80 -acre tract of the City of Maplewood. The proposal places the principle emphasis on the two major concerns identified by Mr. Carl Schenk of the Metropolitan Council: (1) protection of critical slopes; (2) surface water runoff management. Tasks proposed to address the concerns are as follows: Task 1. Collec and COm Ex isti nrr Dat a. A meeting will be held with the City to obtain initial input, including existing slope and vegetation maps, City planning and engineering studies and any policies applicable to the planning effort. Model ordinances compiled by the Metropolitan Council will be reviewed with the City to determine their applicability to the study area. Task 2. Pl Pr eparation. Slope maps, vegetation and visual views will be evaluated. Policies to protect critical areas (if any) will be identified. Reliance will be placed on the policies of the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District and the Water Resources Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. Planned land uses and the type and staging of utility services will be discussed with the Metropolitan Council. Task 3. R Preparation. Ordinances will be developed to assist the City in implementing the policy plans. Since the policies and ordinances will. be applicable only to the designated critical area, it is suggested that all of the major concerns be consolidated into a single set of regulations, thus avoiding unnecessary duplication and overlap. City zoning in the critical area will be reviewed to assure that it is appropriate for water quality management. Any capital improvements planned by the City will be identified as well as the anticipated timing. Proposed policies and regulations will be consolidated into a written report. Ten (1.0) copies of the report will be provided to the City. Task 4.. Pu blic II earinz. The proposed plan will be presented to the public at a hearing. Comments will be recorded to assist the City in making any adjustments to the Plan at its discretion. 3`^'" 'nrca5^T'r -e-n tt wrv �nnarlf .T,Fs'>a'rt?"cR�Pf��`§yq!Trn m e'Y'mn- 'n°+iF+ < ° ;a2 •'��r- Mr, Geoffrey Olson ).'age 2 The level of effort and budget needed to accomplish the above tasks would be distributed approximately as follows: Task 1 500 Tasle 2 1,1 Task 3 1,200 Task 4 1100 TOTAL $3, 1,200 (depending upon involvement of City staff) $4,000 We estimate that the work outlined above can be completed for the cost not to exceed $4,000. 'Pile cost for services described would be based on our standard hourly rates for staff personnel plus reimbursement at cost plus 15% for travel, Communication, reproduction and miscellaneous expenses. Billing would be monthly and payable within 30 days of invoice date. Under no circumstances would the cost of our services exceed the aforementioned estimate without prior authorization by the City of Maplewood. On behalf of Barton- Aschman, we wish to thank the City of Maplewood for inviting us to submit a proposal for this assignment. Should we be selected to undertake the project, we would be prepared to start work immediately so as to insure the City ample time to review the plan and comments from the public hearing prior to the January 1, 1979 deadline. Should you have any questions or comments regarding our proposal, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sineerely Daniel J. l.utenegger / �G Senior Associate (/ Jphn C ullan Vice resident DJL;JCAI;bz MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1978 REGARDING: DELINQUENT WEED CUTTING ACCOUNTS The following is the list to be certified to the taxes for weed cutting services: DATE SERVICED NAME ADDRESS & PROPERTY CODE NO. AMOUNT August 4, 1978 C.L. Huckenpoehler August 11, 1978 Ann Peisert August 11, 1978 BanCon, Inc. 2360 County Road D $ 30.60 No. 57 0011 080 25 1909 Wagner Place $ 38.52 No. 57 2990 070 01 905 Parkway Drive $ 30.68 No. 57 4551 130 04 TOTAL: $.99.90 Seven Percent interest has been added to the charges. The weed cutting was done by DeLanges Grass Cutting, 529 West County Road E, Shore— view, Minnesota 55112. ".l Action by Counoll: Date i MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER REGARDING: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT SEWER ACCOUNTS AND FIRE PROTECTION CHARGES DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1978 Each year at this time it is necessary for Council to take action to certify the delinquent sanitary sewer rental accounts and the fire Port Charges for collection with the real estate taxes. The resolution is as follows: "RESOLVED. that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached list of delinquent sewer rental charges and Fire Protection Charges said list made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1978, collectible in 1979, and which listing includes interest at the rate of seven (7%) percent on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $ n Ac1,1011 by Council: Ite,J coed__.__._... 1 a l: e -- MEMORANDUM TO.: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: ACl'ING CITY MANAGER REGARDING: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT NORTH ST. PAUL WATER SURCHARGES DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1978 The City Council is requested to certify the delinquent North St. Paul Water Surcharges that have been unpaid by Maplewood residents (who are using North St. Paul Water) to the taxes. The necessary resolution is as follows: "RESOLVED, that the City Cleric is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached last of delinquent North St. Paul Water sur- charges against Maplewood properties, said list made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1978, collectible in 1979, and which listing includes interest at the rate of seven (7%) percent on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $ ." F) G- l.ction by Council: ,+Pdorscd ... .------- MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: ACTING CITY MANAGER REGARDING: REFUND OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICE DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1978 Mr. Richard Miller constructed a dwelling at 63 Fenton Avenue. When his contractor tried to find a sewer service stub in that was shown on the asbuil.t plan, it could not be located. The sanitary sewer main and service were assessed in 1961. The City Inspector inspected the premises, but could not locate a service. The original assessment has been paid in full. It is recommended the cost of the sewer service plus interest in the amount of $244.38 be refunded to Mr. Miller. ti.oy Coll' 'i n b 01 -l.: ------ .---- .. _.. j . MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Building and Site Review LOCATION: 1160 Frost Avenue APPLICANT: Nordby and Associates Architects PROJECT: Building Addition for Rodco Midwest DATE: September 22, 1978 Requ The applicant requests approval of plans to construct a 129 by 50 foot building addition. Existin Land Use 1. ! The subject lot is presently developed with the 55 by 86 foot Rodco Midwest building. 2. The existing building is a one story structure with a lower level walkout to the rear. 3. The subject lot measures 2.60 by 398 feet and has an area of 103,480 square feet or 2.38 acres. Prop 1. The proposed 6,450 square foot addition will conform in design with the existing building and will also be a one story structure with a lower level walkout to the rear. 2. The front elevation of the addition will have a stucco exterior with a concrete block window sill. There will be decorative concrete block below the window sill. 3. There will be a wood fascia across the top five foot of the north, east, and west elevations on the addition and existing structure. 4. The southerly elevation will have an exterior of concrete block. 5. There will be considerable fill needed for the proposed addition since the existing grade drops off to the east of the existing building. 6. The exterior of the existing building will be modified to match the proposed addi ti on. 7. The applicant has not proposed what the colors of the existing building and addition will be. ,I 1 Surroundin gLand Use Northerly: Frost Avenue and Flicek Field Soul 'herly: Gloster Park Easterly: Unimproved right -of -way of Frank Street. East of f=rank Street are Burlington Northern's warehouses. Westerly: Unimproved right -of -way of Edward Street. West of Edward Street is Reed Tire and Maplewood Marine Engine Repair. Parki 1. There is presently an unstriped parking area in front of the existing building which parks 10 to 12 cars. 2. The applicant is proposing to redesign this parking area with six angle parking stalls with a 13.5 foot access drive. The six new parking stalls are shown to abut the front property line. 3. Maplewood's parking lot standards require stalls to be 10 by 20 feet in size, stalls to have a 25 foot access drive aisle, and a setback from public right - of way of 15 feet. 4. The proposed addition will have parking in front of it providing for 12 right angle parking stalls. 5. Code requires that one parking space be provided for every 200 square feet of floor area in a retail establishment. Fifty -six stalls are, therefore, required for the existing building and addition combined. 6. In proposing 18 parking stalls the applicant will be 38 stalls short of what code requires for the entire building. 7. The applicant has indicated that there is sufficient room for additional parking in the rear. In this case a paved drive to the rear lot should be installed. Lands ca ink 1. The applicant has proposed a great deal of landscaping. 2. Most of the landscaping proposed adjacent to Frost Avenue, however, is located on the public right -of -way. 3. The landscaping proposed on the easterly side of the building, overlaps onto the right -of -way of undeveloped Frank Street. Plannin Consid eration s 1. The subject parcel is zoned BC, Business Commercial. 2. The Comprehensive Plan has designated that this property develop as Rm, Medium Density Residential. i'0A Gngineering Considerations 1. Sanitary Sewer is available to the subject property from Frost Avenue. 2. There is no water available to the subject site. 3. The City has no immediate plans to construct Edward or Frank Streets adjacent to the subject property. Public Safety Considerations 1. The fact being that water is not available to the site for a distance of 1,500 feet is cause for serious concern. 2. Because of the lack of water availability, there is no way the proposed building addition can have a sprinkler system installed. 3. With the closest hydrant being 1,500 feet away fire protection would be very difficult. The City's fire hoses only stretch a distance of 1,000 feet. 4. There is an existing building moratorium currently in effect by order of the City Council. The moratorium was established in 1975 to deny building permits in areas where there is no water available for fire protection. (see enclosed memo) . Analysis The applicant has proposed an attractive building addition. There are some elements of the proposal which require further attention, however. First, and most important is the Public Safety concern that there is no water available for adequate fire protection. Because of this, an automatic sprinkler system cannot be installed. Compounding the problem is the 1500 foot distance to the nearest fire hydrant. Fire hoses will only reach 1000 feet. Staff feels strongly that serious consider- ation be given to installing water westerly on Frost Avenue from English Street. Maplewood has been experiencing development in this area recently such as a large storage building for Blake Excavating on the northerly side of Frost Avenue. Other points to be considered are those of parking and landscaping. The number of parking stalls proposed in front of the proposed addition are probably adequate, judging from the number of customer vehicles present during business hours. The Zoning Code, however, requires additional parking stalls. These could be provided at the rear of the building. In this instance, though, there should be a paved driveway going back to the rear lot. The area proposed for the sir, stalls in front of the existing building could be better utilized as a landscaped area. The parking situation would not suffer because of this with additional parking in the rear. The applicant hs proposed a large amount of landscaping. Ramsey County has been concerned that there not be any plantings on County rights -of -way which will block traffic vision. Ramsey County and City Engineer must, therefore, approve any plantings on the boulevard. Since the applicant is now using and will continue to use the westerly driveway which runs over Edward Street, it should be made clear that the City will not be 1 . held liable for upkeep or accidents upon the right -of -way. Our attorney has informed us that, if a driveway is being constructed on a public right -of -way, the City will own and be responsible for the driveway. This means that we are legally liable for the maintenance. As an example, if a customer at the applicant's business were to become ill and call an ambulance, we could be liabl6 if an ambulance would not get to the business because of lack of maintenance or snow plowing. If a child on a bike was injured after hitting a chuck hole, we could be liable. It is, therefore, important that the driveway design be approved by the City Engineer and that an agreement be recorded that runs with the land guaranteeing maintenance of the drive- way. Recomm Approval of the building and site plans subject to the following conditions: 1. Plantings on the boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Ramsey County; 2. The six proposed parking stalls in front of the existing building shall be eliminated. This area shall be landscaped in the same manner as the area east of proposed stall number 6. 3. The drive aisle in front of the existing building shall be increased to 20 feet in width; 4. The driveway to the parking lot to the rear of the building from the street shall be p4ve�, 5. A striped parking area in the rear shall be provided for overflow parking; 6. Six inch concrete curbing and striping to be provided around both front and rear parking lot; 7. An exterior storage be restricted to the rear of the building c t icr b O n;.ci1 t. ?a e� tec..........__.__._.. 1 a ,. To: N Mayor and Cif.,y Council 1: ROM: Michael G. Hiller, City 14anager SUBJECT: ..Water System ' Moratorium (Agenda Item 11-36) DATE: April 28, :1975 It does not appear feasible to establish exact boundaries for imprementing the building moratorium clue to the following: I. Incomplete data of hydrant flow tests in relation to the ground elevation. 2. Requirements for A ffWent :fi re d ows due to a. type of building b. type of construction - C. type of occupancies ' d. size of building : It is re.com; fended that the min"Imum, standards as set forth In the "Guide for Determ'inat'ion of Required Fire Floe as published by the Insurance Services Office be adopted as a standard. VMen. a building permit is requested, a determination of the required fire flow would be rude and compared to the "guide" for adequate flcc;. If the existing flow does not meet the minimum 'flow as de =termined by the "quide ", then °a building permit would not be issued. For large industrial or commercial buiI dings, fire flows as determined by Factory Mutual Engineering or other recognized insurance underwriters may be utilized. In summary, it is the staff's recom^'eldat'iall that building permits be denied when the actual fire. flow adjacent to the requested permit area does not meet the mininnno established standards. 1 . R a U ltl J r h J NO AV L. of C R( ")RDGY AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS 'ETITIONE.R JILDING%S11E 1 Eb! 9 -22 -7II r ATE J TM . r� I ti,1% Na:. 10 VILLM OF MAPLEWOOD %IRDBY AND ASSOCIATES, ARCNITL"CTS IETITI 3UI1_DING/SITE REVIEW EQUEST P . 19 ' .7 I A 2 0 4 0.3 ?. t 0 Is 1 14 L ga, Is 20 15 %IRDBY AND ASSOCIATES, ARCNITL"CTS IETITI 3UI1_DING/SITE REVIEW EQUEST P . 19 ' .7 I A 2 0 4 0.3 ?. t 0 Is 1 IA L ga, 20 %IRDBY AND ASSOCIATES, ARCNITL"CTS IETITI 3UI1_DING/SITE REVIEW EQUEST P . 19 ' .7 I A 2 0 4 0.3 ?. /EV _ EASE LE.ASGD TO ViMKU C- _ A ---i cl 1. k4 0 L14 CD ', F UT 7 - T - - 7 11 7�1' r -TT I? 1160 FROST AVENUE Z. iC 9-22-78 DATE L E t 0 IA L ga, /EV _ EASE LE.ASGD TO ViMKU C- _ A ---i cl 1. k4 0 L14 CD ', F UT 7 - T - - 7 11 7�1' r -TT I? 1160 FROST AVENUE Z. iC 9-22-78 DATE L E f Board Member Sjolander moved the Board recommend to the City Council approval of the building and site plans for Rodco Midwest subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Board for review prior to issuance of occupancy permit. 2. The six proposed parking stalls in front of the existing building shall be eliminated to provide the 15 foot setback. 3. The dirve aisle in front of the existing building shall be increased to 20 feet in width; 4. The driveway to the parking lot to the rear of the building from the street shall be paved; 5. A parking area in the rear shall be provided for overflow parking; 6. Sir, inch concrete curbing on the owners property and striping to be provided around front parking lot; 7. All exterior storage be restricted to the rear of the building. 8. The driveway in front of addition shall be 25 feet rather than 24. 9. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. Chairman Huot seconded Ayes all October 3, 1978 STAFF REPORT To: Mayor and City Council From: City Manager Subject: Water Flow Building Moritorium The Public Safety Department requested a moritorium on building construction on the recommendation of the Fire Marshal on December 5, 1974. This was prompted by the discovery that a multi - story - apartment building was - constructed that did not have adequate water supply for firefighting purposes. The area in question has now been upgraded with the addition of the Beebe Road water booster station. Due to low fire flows for adequate fire protection in other areas and in areas where no water mains exist in our City, our consulting engineers, Kirkham Michael, issued a report on April 28, 1975, to the City Engineer recomwending a building moratorium for the entire City.until fire flows could be achieved as outlined in the Insurance Services Office "Guide for Determination of Re- quired Fire Flow." A copy of that letter is also attached for your information along with a copy of the Insurance Services "Guide for Fire Flows." On May 1, 1975, upon recommendation of the City Manager, the City Council adopted a water flow building moritorium. - A copy of the minutes of that action is attached. Staff feels that adequate water supply is a basic ingredient for all fire suppression efforts. It is necessary to extinguish fires that do occur, both large and small. Also, for quite some time we have strongly advocated sprinkler fire suppression devices. Water supply is basic to these installations. In view of the foregoing; Staff must, for life safety purposes, continue to recommend denial of construction- permits.for commerc -iall industrial and mercan- tile building-and multi- story - .apartments where adequate water supply -for- fire '. protection purposes are not met according to the - minimum guidelines ectablished. cc Fire Marshal Fire File A ril 1975 p r W a sr ks $r V_ RE. Maplelrood water System x PMA B740761 Im Mr. Bob Collier ; Director of Public Works City of.14aplewood 1380 frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Collier: We have reviewed the water system in an effort to establish areas where a building moratorium should be issued. It would be our recommendation that a moratorium be declared for the entire city. When a building permit is requested, a determination of required fire flow should be made. I£ the required flows can be met- from the present system then a building permit could be issued. The determination of the.required fire flows should be determined from the "Guide For Determination of Required Fire Flow" prepared by the Insurance Services Office. The minimum flow determined by the guide for the type of structure should be used. For industrial or commercial buildings, fire flows as determined by Factory Mutual Engineering or other recognized insurance underwriter can be used as a guide. Enclosed is a copy of hydrant flow tests conducted on April 25 & 28, 1975. we have not had.an opportunity to analyze the data yet. we do note, however, that the flows in the leg will only support single family Dousing. Flows and pressure will be less in the summer when the demand for water is greater, therefore, these flows could be cor_- sidered the maximum available at this time. 7601 KENTUCKY A'!ENUE, NO. • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55428 • 612 -425 -5777 _ I V11 a Y . KIRKHAM X MICHAEL °2✓�r Bob Collier,: ? a' p3 8, 1975 Page 2 with some additional tests, -- :it would — be- possible to develop a pressure and flow map to aid in determining critical areas of fire protection. Very truly yours, { - KIRI'NHAM, MICHAEL &,ASSOCIATES James D. w ie y";'P.E. /f (' JDW /ma r. 1 , . _ ..11 I �T;URANCE SERVICES OFFICE I*ITJNICIPAL SURVT:Y SERVICE 1$0 IVATF.R.STREET NEW lORIi, N. T. 10035 DECEMIDE R, 1974 ��.., INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE - GUIDE FOR DETEP14INATION OF REQUIRED FIRE FLOW :_ •: r •' 'r,i : D v An estimate of the fire flow required for a given fire area may be de- ternined by the formula:. ' where _ F = the required fire flow in gpm C =coefficient related to the type of construction. - C = 1.5 for wood frame construction = 1.0 for ordinary construction -- _ 0.9 far heavy timber type buildings = 0.8 for noncombustible construction - - = 0.6 for fire - resistive construction Note: For types of construction and/or materi.aLs that do not fall within ....the categories given, use a coefficient reflecting the difference. Coefficients shall not be Treater than 1.5 nor less than 0.6 and by inter} t rp shall 1la' be (i2tel'i:J_ne! interpolation. $UCjl In e_ Olc.t' -UIl be between co r,secut :eve types of construction as listed above. Defini- tions of types of construction are included in the Appendix,._ A = the total floor area (including all stories, but excluding base`ments). ' _ in the building being considered. For fire - resistive buildings consider the 6 largest successive floor areas.if the vertical.openings are unprotected; if the vertical openings are properly protected, consider only the 3 largest suc- cessive floor areas. The fire flow as determined by the above shall not exceed'. 8,000 gpm for wood frame construction - 8,000 gpm for ordinary and heavy timber construction •.6,000 gpm for noncombustible construction .6,000 gpm for fire- resistive construction except that for a normal 1 -story building of . any type- of construction the fire flow shall not exceed 6,000 gpm. The fire flow shall not be less than 500 gpm.' For 1- fami3y and small. 2- family dwelling_: not exceeding 2 stories ir. height sec note 10. 2. The value obtained in No. 1 above may be reduced by up to 25'/ for occupancies -i having a lo fire hazard or rzy be increased by up to 25% for occupancies having a high fire hazard, As a guide. for determining low or high hazard occupancies see the',liSts in the Appendix.. _ The fire flow shall not be less than 500 gpm. g, The value obtained in Number 2 above may be reduced by up to 50% for complete tomatic sprinkler protection. vnere buildings are either .fire resistive or non - co;5ustible construction, and have a low fire hazard, the reduction may be up to 75%. The percentage reduction made for an automatic sprinkler system gill depend upon the �extcnt to which the system is ,judged to reduce the possibility of fires spreading fire area. Normally this reduction will not be the maximum w ithin and beyond the allowed without proper system supervision including rater flow and; aloes. _ i To the value obtained in No. 2 above a percentage should be added for structures exposed within 150 feet by the fire area under consideration. This percentage shell depend upon the height, area, and construction of the building(s) being exposed, the separation, openings in the exposed building(s), the length of e xposure, the provision of automat-ic sprinklers and /or outside sprinkleeffectthe -- building(s) exposed, the occupancy of the exposed building(s), and the hillside locations on the possible spread of fire. The percentage for any one side generally should not exceed.the following limits for the separations shown: = Separation - Percentage _. 0-10 feet _- 25% .' 11 -30 _ 20 31 -60 _ - 15 61 -3 -00 10 5 101 -i5U - The total percentage shall be'the sum of the percentages for all. sides, but shall not exceed 75 %. 5. The value obtained in No. 2 above is reduced the percentage (if any) •determined in Ho. 3 above and increased by the percentage (if any) determined in No. 4 above. __ . The fire flow shall not exceed 12,000 gpm nor be less than 500 gpm. Note l: The guide is not expected to necessarily provide an adequate .value for lumber yards, petroleum storage, refineries, grain elevators, and large chemical plants but may indicate a minimum I value for these hazards. Note 2: Judgment must be used for business, industrials and other occupancies not specifically mentioned. Note 3: Consideration should be to the configuration of the building(s) being considered and to the fire department accessibility. Note 4: Wood frame structures separated by less than 10 feet shall be considered as one fire area. .Cote 5: Party Val-1s:- Normally an unpierced party (common) wall may warrant up to a 10% exposure charge. -2- Note 6: Ifigh one -story buildings:- ti'hen a building is stated as 1 2 or more stories, the number of stories to be used in the formula depends upon the use being made of the building. For example consider a 1 = 3 -story _ building. If the building is being used for high - piled stock, or for .... rack storage, the building would probably be considered as 3 stories and, . - in addition, an increased percentage for occupancy may be warranted. However, if the building is being used for steel fabrication and the extra height is provided only to facilitate movement of objects by a crane, the building would probably be considered as a 1 -story building and a decreased : for occupancy may be warranted. Tote 7:. If a building is exposed within 150 feet, normally some percentage increase for exposure will be made. Note 8: ]:There wood shingle roofs could contribute to spreading fires, add 500 gpm. Note 4: Any noncombustible building is. considered to warrant an 0.8 coefficient. Note 10: Dwellings;- For groupings of 1- family and small 2- family dwellings not exceeding.2 stories in height, the following short r.,etbcd may be used. (For other residential buildings, the regular method should be used.) G. Determine the total increase for exposures. Do not round off the value. -3- Exposure distances Suggested required fire flow Over 100' - . - 500 ..gpm ': - 31-100' _.. _ 750 -1000 - - 11 -30' 1000 -1500 r• . ; .. .- ;:,, :, <,...,.... 10' or less 1500 -2000* *If the buildings are continuous, use a minimum of 2500 Also consider Vote Outline of Proce dure A. Determine the type of construction. B. Determine the ground floor area. , ' C. Determine the height in stories. ` D. Using tables in the Appendix, determine the required fire flow to the nearest 250 gpm. E. Determine the increase or decrease for occupancy and apply to the value obtained in D above.' Do not round off the answer.' - F. Determine the decrease, if any, for automatic spr.inUer protection. Do not round off the value. : • G. Determine the total increase for exposures. Do not round off the value. -3- answer obtained in E, subtract the value obtained in F and add the }I. To the Value obtained in G. Round off the final answer to the nearest 250 gpm if less than 2500 gpm and to the nearest 500 gpm if greater than 2500 gpm.' Use of Tables (Steps A, B, C, D) The tables use the GI:OIP D APB A of the building and the height of th.e building Using the tab corresponding to the type of construction, look under stories. - the nurlber Of stories and locate the ground area of the buildings) being considered between two ground areas given in the table. The corresponding fire flow is found _in the left colutm. Examples Given: A 3- story building of ordinary construction of 7300 square feet .a. (ground area). Using the table C = 1.0, in the 3 -story column, 7300 square ' feet falls between 7100 and 8500 square feet and the corresponding fire ^ flow is 2750 gpm. JJ _ a,. Given: A 3- story building of ordinary construction of 7300 square feet (ground area) communicating to a 5 -story build-.r.g of o'kdinary construction of 9700 square feet (ground area) for a total ground area of 17,000 square • feet. Determine the total floor area which equals 3 (7300) + 5 (9700) = 70,400 square feet. Using the table C = 1.0, under the one story column for 70,400 square feet the corresponding fire flow is 4750 gpm. C. Given: A 3 -story wood frame building of 7300 square feet (ground area) communicating with a 5 -story building of ordinary construction of 9700 square feet (ground area) for a total ground area of 17,000 square feet, - Determine the total floor area for each type of construction and for the f - fire area which is 3 (7300) = 21,900 square feet of wood frame construe- i tion, 5 (9700) = 48,500 square feet of ordinary construction, and a total area of 70,400 square feet with 31% being of wood frame construction and 69% being of ordinary construction. Under the one -story column in the '.wood frame construction table (C = 1.5), an area of 70,400 square feet has a corresponding fir(: flow of 7250 gpm. Similarly, under the one -story column in the ordinary construction table (C = 1.0), an area of 70 square feet has a corresponding fire flow of 4750 gpm. In this case, the fire flow will be 31% (7250) + 69% (4750) = 2250 + 3280 = 5530 gpn or, to the nearest 250 gpm = 5500 gpm. d. Given: A 2 -story building consisting of 10,000 square feet (ground area) of wood frame construction, 15,000 square feet (ground area) of ordinary construction, 20,000 square feet (ground area) of noncombustible con - struction, and 25,000 square feet (ground area) of fire resistive con- struction. The total floor area is 140,000 square feet. The maxi ur fire flow for wood fr.ar- construction is at 85,100 square feet (see table). Rote: "Idhen the total area exceeds the upper liirdt for the poorest type of f' construction, limit the floor area of the best type(s) of construction -so �- that the total area considered does not exceed the upper limit for the Poorest type of construction." Consider 2 x 10.,000 = 20,000 square feet • ' r of wood frame construction, plus 2 x 15,000 _'30,000 souare feets of ordinary construction plus 2 x 20,000 = 40,000 square feet (limited to 35,100 square feet) of noncombustible construction. The fire flow kill be 24 x 8000 - (wood frame) + 35% x 6750* (ordinary) + 41% 7: 5500* (noncombustible) = 1920 +.2362.+ 2255 = 6537 gpm, or to the nearest 250 gpm, = 6500 gpm. • *based upon 140,000 square feet e.' Civen: A 2 -story building of or construction of 105,000 square feet (ground area) corLrunicates with a 1 -story building of noncombustible construction of 60,000 square feet (ground area). Normally the required fire flow would be determined by proportioning as in "c" above. This would- result in a required fire flow of 7460 gpm, or 7500 gpm. However, it is to be noted that the total area of the 2 -story building alone results in a fire flow of 8,000 gpm and, of course, the logical answer would be 8,000 gpm. Any time the total area results in the use of an upper limit for. floor, the possibility of a portion of the fire area justifying'the upper limit must be investigated. f. Given: A normal 1 -story building of ordinary construction of 210,000 square feet (ground'aiea) The table gives a required fire flow Of 8,000 gpm, however, since this is a normal 1 -story building, the maximum fire flow is 6,000 Spm. g. Given: A normal 1 -story building of ordinary construction of 80,000 square ,.feet co- =,jnicates with a norip al 1 -story building of nonco::ioustible construe- tion of 85,000 square feet. 11'03 - raally the required fire flow would be de- termined by proportioning as in "c" above. This would result in a required . fire flow of 6480 gpm, or 6500 gpm. However, since these are normal 1- story buildings the maximum fire flow is.6,000 gpm. Y 3 A P P E N D I X TYPES OF COHSTRUMO:4 ° For the specific purpose of using the Guide, the following defir.i- tions may be used: Fire- Resistive Construction. - Any structure that is considered fire- resistive by any of the four model building codes. lvoncombustible Construction.- Any structure having all structural members including walls, columns, piers, beams, girders, trusses, floors, and roofs of noncombustible material and not _ qualifying as fire - resistive construction. Ordinary Construction.- Pjiy str.uctur-e having exterior walls of masonry or other noncombustible material in v:•hich the other structural members, including but not limited to columns,. floors, roofs, beans, girders, and joists, are wholly or partly of wood or other combustible material. Heavy timber type buildings are required to satisfy a number of specific provisions (see any of the four model building -codes). Vood Frame Construction.- Any structure in which the structural members are wholly or partly of wood or other combustible material and the construction does not qualify as ordinary . construction. OOCUPANCY Low Hazard Occupancies: Apartments Libraries, except Large Stack.Room Areas Asylum Uus curs r Churches Nursing, Convalescent and Care ]comes Clubs Office.Eui.ldings Colleges and Universities Prisons .•:• �= .:.:•.:.., - Dormitories Public Bui.l.dings ` Dwellings Rooming Houses Hospitals Schools Hotels Tenements ' Institutions High Hazard Occupancies:. 7. Aircraft Hangers Cereal, Feed, Flour and Grist Mills Chemical Works - High Hazard. Cotton Picker and Opening Operations Explosives and Pyrotechnics Manufacturing High Piled Combustible Storage in excess of 21 feet high Linoleum and Oilcloth Manufacturing Linseed Oil Mills Match Manufacturing Oil P.efi.neries Paint Shops Pyroxylin Plastic ldanufacturing and Processing Shade Cloth Manufacturing Solvent Extracting. � Varnish and Paint Works Wood Working with F]a:nmable Finishing - Other occupancies involving processing, mixing, storage and dispensing flammable and /or.' combustible liquids. 11 Experience has shocm that the following credits should normally ' be applied for the occupancies listed: + Dwellings *, apartments, and dormitories. , _ -25% Hospitals -207 Elementary schools 20% Junior and Senior high schools -15% Open parking garages _25% *When applying the standard method. For other occupancies, good judgment should be used, and the percentage increase or decrease will not necessarily be the same fora all buildings that are in the same general category - for exavple "Colleges and Universities ": th }r could range from a 25% decrease for buildings used only as dormitories to an increase for a chemical laboratory. Even when considering high schools, the decrease should be less if they have extensive shops. -- It is expected that in co miercial buildings no percentage increase or decrease for occupancy will be applied in most of the fire flow de- terminations. In general, percentage increase or decrease will not . at the limits of + 25 %. E)TOSUP.ES When determining exposures it is necessary to understand that the exposure percentage increase for a fire in a building (x) ex— posing another building ( does not•nccessarily equal the percentage ._ increase when the fire is in building (y) exposing building (x). The Guide gives the maximum possible percentage for exposure at specified -distances. However., these maximum percentages should not be used for all exposures at those distances. In each case the percentage applied should reflect the actual conditions but should not exceed the per- centage listed. r .. - _•_^ The maximum percentage for the separations listed generally should be used if the exposed building meets all of the following conditions: a. Same type or a poorer type of construction than the -•fire building. b. Same or greater height than the fire building. -' ••c. Contains unprotected exposed openings. I1�SURAICE SERVICES OFFICE pro FIRE FLAW VS GROUND AREA F= 18C(A) Wood Frame Construction F =gom; C =1.5 (ground area in square feet) �A =area in sq. ft. 2 3- 4 5 6 S *_oriE :I • � - 200 . -100 - 100 - 100 300 500 750 X00- _ 300 200 200 600 1,100 1000 _- - 1,700 900 600• 400 300 300 1250 WO 700 500 400 - 700 1,300. 2,600 -- 1500 1,200 900 700 600 1,800 3,600 1750 4,800- 2,400 1,600 1,200 1,000 800 2000 -. 6,200 .. 2,100-- � - 1,600 - 1,200- 1,000 3,100 2250 -- 2,600 1,900 I,SUO 1,300 3,900 7,700 2500 9,400 4,700 3,100- 2,400 1,900 .1,600' 2750 11,300 2,800 2,300 1,900 3,800 5,700 .3000 13 6,700 4,500 3,40C 2,700 2,200 3250 - 15,600 - 7,800 3,900 3,100 - - 2,600 5,200 3500 18,000 9,000 6,000 4,500 3;600 3,000 3750 20,600 10,300 6,900 5,200 4,100 - 3,400 4000 23,300 11,700 -- - 7,80 0 5,800 4,700 3,900' 4 250 26 13,200 8,800 6,600 5,300 4,400 4500 29,300 14,700 9,800 7,300 5,900 4,900 - 4750 32,600 16,300- 10,900 8,200 6,500 5,400 5000 36,000 - -- 18,000 12,000 9,000• 7,200 6,000 5250 39,600 19,800 13,200 9,900 7,900 6,600 5500 43,400 -- 21,700 14,500- 10,900 8,700 7 -,200 5750 47 ,400 23,700 - 15,E00 - 1.1;900 9,500 7,900 6000 -8- _ ;INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE Q I FIRE FIOW VS G ROUND AREA F =18C(h) o Wood Frame Construction F =gpm; C =1,5 ` -i - - -- - (ground area in square feet) A =area in.sq, ft. gum ` 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stc• -_ 6000 51,500 25,800 17,200 12,900 10,300 8,600 6250 55,700 27,900 -- 18,600 13,900 -- 11,100- -9,300 6500 60,200 30,10 20,100 15,100 12,ODO -- 10,000 6750 64,800 32,400 21,600 16,200 13,000 10,800 7000 (� (� 69,600 34,800 -- 23,200 17,400 13,900 11,600 7250 74,600 37,300 24,900 -- 18,700 14,900 12,400 7500 79,800- 39,900 26,600 2.0,000 16,000- 13,300 7750 . 85,100 42,600- 28,400 21,300 -- 17,000 14,200 Iluu�� 8000 _.. -- 630,,11 106,500- 53,300 35,500 26,600 _ 21,300 17,800 ma SEP\ PICE ICES Or o S FIRE FIT VS GROTIT AREA F =18C (A)*0 ' " Ordinary Construction F =gprs; C =1.0 ` :�- (ground area in square feet) `A =area in sq. ft. 2 3 4 _ : - ,6' Storie 500 1,200 600 400 300 200 200 750 2,400- 1,200 800 _ 600 '500 400 1000 3,900 2,000 1;300 1,000 800 700 1250 5,800 2,900 1,900------1,500 1,200 1,000 1500 5,200 2,700 2,100 1,600 1,400 . 4,100 1750 10,900 5,500 3,600 ?,700 2,200 1,800 • 2000 13,900 7,000 4,600 -- 3,500.. 2,800 2,300 _2250 C� 17,400 8,700 5,800 4,400 3,500 2,900 (U ' 2500 _ _... 21,360 10,700- 7,100 5,300 - -- 4,300 3,600 2750 �- 25,500 12,800 -- 8,500 6,400 5,100 . 4,300 3000 , 30,100 . 15,100 10,000 7,500 6,000 5,000 3250 35,200 17,600 11,700 8,800 - 7,000 5,900 ' 3500 40,600 20,300 13,500 10,200 8,100 6,800 _... 3750 46,400 23,200 -15,500--- 9,300 7,700 4000 52,500 26,300 17,500 13,100 10,500 8,800 4250 59,100 29,600 19,700 14,800 11,800 9,900 4500 66,000 33,000 22,000 16,500 13,200 - - 11,000 4750' 73,300 _ 36,700 24,400 18,300 • 14,700 12,200 5000 1 " 81,100 40,600 27,000 20,300 16,200 13,500 5250 89,200 44,600 29,700 22,300 17,800 14,900 5500 97,700 48,900 -- 32,600 -- 24,400 -- -- 19,500 16,300 630,,11 106,500- 53,300 35,500 26,600 _ 21,300 17,800 Z12SlTAl.XCE SERVICES OFFICE FIRE FLOW VS GROUND AREA Ordinary Construction (ground area in square feet) 2 3 4 6000 115,800 57,900 38;600 23,900 23,200 19,300 6250 - .., ...... _ 125,500 62,800 41,800 31,400 25,100 20,900 6500 135,500- 67,300 -- 45,200 - 33,900 -- 27,100 22,600 6750 _ 145,300 72,900 - -- 48,600 36;500 29,200 24,300 .7000 _ ...... 156,700 -- 78,400 -- 52,200 39,200 31,300 26,100 7250 167,900 - 54,000 56,000 - 42,000 - 33,600 23,000 7500 _ 179,400 89,700 59, 800 44,900 . 35,900 29,900 7.750 .. ,. __.:: - _..._:.• :,. 191,400 95,700 - -- 63,800 47,900 --- - 38,300 31,900 5000 2750 k=# 10 3250 - - 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 Mom 5250 5500 5750 6000 - 33,200 1.6,600 11,100- 8,300- 6,L00 -- -$,500 -39,700 19,900 13,200 9,900 7,900 • 6,600 - 47,100 23,600 15,700 11,800 INSURANCE SEP.VICES oFrlCS - 54,900 27,500 1.8,300 13,700 11,000 -9,200 - 63,400 O o 21,100 - 15,00 12,700 FIRE FLOW VS GF.OND AREA -e F= lBC(A) 18,100 14,500 _- Non - combustible Construction 27,400 F =Bpm; C =0.8 16,400 13,700 - 92,400 (ground are square a in q feet ) A =area in s q• ft. - nm ' 7 ? 3 4 5 �. S tori 500 38,200 28,700 22,900 19,100 126;700 63,400 42,200 - 1,900 1,000 600 500 400 -- 300 46,500 750 27,900 23, ?.00 152,600 76,300 50,900 38,200- 30,500 3,700 1.,900 ].,200 - - 900 -- 700 600 33,300 1000 _. _.. 6,100 3,100 2,000 1,500 1,200 1,000 1250 - n 9,100 4•,600 3,000 2,300 1,800 - 1.,500 �L 1500 12,70E 6,400 .- 4,200 3,200 2,500-------2,100 1750 - -- 17 5,700 4,100 3,400 2,800 C - 2000 21,800 10,900- _ 7,300 . 5,500 4,400 3,600 2250 . - .- -- - _- ... . _ .... 27,200 13 600 9,100 6,800 5,4 -00 4,500 2500 (t 2750 k=# 10 3250 - - 3500 3750 4000 4250 4500 4750 Mom 5250 5500 5750 6000 - 33,200 1.6,600 11,100- 8,300- 6,L00 -- -$,500 -39,700 19,900 13,200 9,900 7,900 • 6,600 - 47,100 23,600 15,700 11,800 9,400 7,900 - 54,900 27,500 1.8,300 13,700 11,000 -9,200 - 63,400 .- 31,700 21,100 - 15,00 12,700 10,600 - 72,400 - 36,200 24,100 18,100 14,500 12,100 - 82,100 41,200- 27,400 20,500 16,400 13,700 - 92,400 46,200 30,800 -- 23,100 - 18,500 15,400 103,100 51,600 -- 34,400 25,800 20,600 17,200 114,600 57,300 - 38,200 28,700 22,900 19,100 126;700 63,400 42,200 - 31,700 25,300 21,1.00 139,400 -- 69,700 -- 46,500 34,900 27,900 23, ?.00 152,600 76,300 50,900 38,200- 30,500 25,400 166,500- 83,300, 55,500 -- 41,600 33,300 27,800 I . . . < -12- C C C H C� l_ INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE FIRE -FLOW VS GROUND AREA . w Fire Resistive Construction (ground area in square feet) 1 2 3 C 0 u6 0.5 Fz18C(A) F =gpm; C: =0.6 A =area in sq. ft. 500 3,300 1,700 1,100 800 700 - -600 750 112,700 56,400 37,600 28,200 22,500 18,800 - 6,600. 3,300 2,200 1,700- 1,300 ---- -1,100 1000 64,400 42,900 32.,200 25,700 21,500 4000 - - 5,500 3,600 2,700 2,200 1,800 10,900 1250 48,600 36,500 29,200 24,300 4250 16,2.00 ---- 8,100 5,400 4,100 - 3,200 - -2,700 1500 41.,100 •32,800 2.7,400 4500 22,700 11,400- 7,600 -- 5,700 ---- -- 4 •3,800 1750 30,200 15,100 10,1.00 7,600 6,000 5,000 2000 38,700 19,400 12,900 - 9,700- - 7,700- 6,500 2250 48,300 24,200 16,100 1.2,100 --- -9,700 8,100 2500 _. 59,000 29,500 -19,700 14,800 -- 11.,800- 9,800 2750 0,900 35,,500 23,600 17,700 14,200 11,800 3000 83,700 41,900 - 27,900 20,900 16,800 -- 13,900 3250 97,700 48,900 - =32,600 24,400 19,500 16,300 3500 . 112,700 56,400 37,600 28,200 22,500 18,800 3750 128,700 64,400 42,900 32.,200 25,700 21,500 4000 145,900 73,000 48,600 36,500 29,200 24,300 4250 -- 164,200-82,100 54,700 41.,100 •32,800 2.7,400 4500 183,400 91,700 61,100 45,900 36,700 30,600 4750 203,700 101,900 67,900 50,900 40,700 34,000 5000 225,200 :"' 112,600 75,100 56,300 45,000 37,600 5250 247,700 123,90 , 82,600 61,900 49,500 41,300 5500 5750 271,200 ---- 135,600 90,400 67,800 54,200 45,200 295,900 148,000 98,600 74,000 59,200 49,300 6000 Stories . o n D Iu c== 4=3 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M., Thursday, May 1, 1975 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 75 -15 A, CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building and called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Bruton. B, ROLL CALL Robert T. Bruton, Mayor Present John C. Greavu, Councilman Arrived at 9:05 P.M. Donald J. Wiegert, Councilman Present Norman G. Anderson, Councilman Present Burton A. Murdock, Councilman Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1, Minutes No. 75 -13 (April 17, 1975)• Councilman Anderson moved that the Minutes of Meeting No. 75 -13 (April 17, 1975) be approved as corrected: Page 11: Item J 3f: insert "2) for the reasons given by the Planning Commission" Page 12: Item 15d: insert "from the Community Design Review Board" Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bruton moved approval of the agenda with the following items added: 1. League appointments 2. Second Planner 3. . Beam Avenue Plan Change - Reasons 4. Move Agenda Items H3 and 4 to follow Item J 5, Commissions Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all, P, PUBLIC HEARINGS None. AWARDING OF BIDS 1, Police Cars a. Manager Miller stated that utilizing the City- County Purchasing Department, we received bids from two companies for four station wagon and one sedan patrol Y _ 1 _ 5/1 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessments for Sanitary Sewer Improvement 3 and Water Improvement 73 -1 against the heretofore mentioned properties be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County in the amounts stated on the attached list; said list made a part herein. Seconded by Councilman Murdock. Ayes - all. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued) 3. Water System a. Engineering Services 1. Manager Miller stated in order to proceed with an upgrading of the Maple- wood water system to conform with a retail system, we have asked Kirkham Michael to submit a proposal for doing the engineering work. Attached is a letter outlining the scope of services to be accomplished in conjunction with that feasibility report. i The rate is the same as established for previous work and is in line with that charged by our other consulting engineering firms. It is felt that City forces will be able to carry out the work proposed under Item 1 (to conduct a hydrant flow test program), and it is therefore recommended that the proposal of Kirk- ham Michael b& accepted with the deletion of Item 1 in the scope of services and a reduction in the maximum cost to $8,500.00. 2. Councilman Wiegert moved to authorize Kirkham, Michael and Associates prepare a study with a maximum cost to $10,000 to include Items 2 thru 6 c their report and the addition of an item r equiring review of the previous branch well system. Seconded by Mayor Bruton. Ayes - Mayor Bruton, Councilmen Anderson, Murdock and Wiegert. Nays — Councilman Greavu. Motion carried. b. Moratorium __ 1. Manager Miller presented the staff report and stated it is recommended that the minimum standards as set forth in the "Guide for Determination of 1. 1 Required Fire Flow" as published by the Insurance Services Office be adopted 5 as a standard. When a building permit is requested, a determination of the required fire flow would be made and compared to the "guide" for adequate flow. If the existing flow does not meet the minimum flow as determined by the "guide ", then a building permit would not be issued. For large industrial or commercial buildings, fire flows as determined by Factory Mutual Engineering or other recognized insurance underwriters may be utilized:. i ;�. %ti In summary, it is the staff's recommendation that building permits be denied when the actual fire flow adjacent to the requested permit area does not meet the minimum established standards. 2. Councilman Wiegert moved that the moratorium be conducted as recommended in the Manager's report. Seconded by Councilman Murdock. Ayes - Mayor Bruton, Councilmen Anderson, Murdock and Wiegert. Nays - Councilman Greavu. Motion carried. 4 . Zone Change - South Side of Beam Avenue, White Bear Avenue to Southlawn Drive a. Manager Miller stated it is recommended that this zone change be tabled and reviewed in conjunction with the rezoning of property to the west between South - lawn Drive and Hazelwood Street. Due to the fact that the Council will be utilizing the "overlay" concept, it is felt that this entire area should be considered as a unit. b. Councilman Anderson moved to table Item H -4 until the meeting of J 5, 1975. r Seconded by Mayor Bruton. Ayes - all. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 1975 Legislation Manager Miller explained how the Omnibus Tax Bill would effect municipalities. 2. Ramsey County Snowmobile Appointment a. Manager Miller stated the Ramsey County League has established a committee to study the feasibility of a uniform snowmobile ordinance to be implemented throughout Ramsey County. Maplewood has previously indicated its willingness to compromise on some areas of this regulation of snowmobiles. We have received a request for the appointment of one person to serve on the committee from Maple- wood. b. Councilman Wiegert moved to appoint Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Planning Commission Appointment a. Manager Miller stated the Planning Commission interviewed four applicants for the existing vacancy on the Commission and made the following recommendation: At their meeting of April 21, 1975 the Planning Commission interviewed four appli- cants for the existing vacancy on the Commission. Subsequent to this review the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the following names, in order of preference, for the City Council's consideration: Ralph E. Flaugher, Herman Schulte, Gary Sherbourne and Richard Pearson. - 10 - 5/1 �lU 'V k MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council I-ROM: Acting City Manager SUBJECT: Building and Site Review APPLICANT: 01 Company LOCATION: Conway Avenue and 17th Street PROJECT: Building No. 240 3M Center DATE: September 20, 1978 Re ues t The applicant requests approval of building design plans to construct an addition onto building number 240 at the 311 Center. kxisting Develo pment The subject site is presently developed with building 240, a 2.6,500 square foot one story manufacturing building. Propos 1. The applicant is proposing to construct a 3,943 square foot office addition. 2. The addition will confirm in appearance to the existing structure, which consists of medium brown face brick with an off -white precast fascia panel along the top. 3. 1,688 square feet of the existing building will be converted to office space also. Parki nq_ 1. According to Code, there should be 20 parking stalls available for the proposed addition. 2. Code requires that one parking stall be provided for every 200 square feet of floor area in an office building. 3. The applicant has indicated that there will be approximately 15 new employees in building 240 with the new addition. 4. The applicant has stated that the existing parking facilities are adequate to accommodate additional employees. L.andscani n_c� 1. Landscaping has not been proposed at this time. 2. 'The applicant has indicated, however, that plantings will be provided adjacent to the addi Lion equal 'Lo those which will be displaced because of construction. Surrounding Land Uses The land surrounding Building 240 is developed with the office - industrial site of 3M Center. Planning Consider 1. The subject property is zoned M -2 Heavy Manufacturing 2. The subject property is designated by the Comprehensive Plan to develop as DR, Development and Research Center. Public Wo Con siderations The subject property is presently provided with water and sanitary sewer. A nLa sis Staff finds no problem with the proposed addition. 3M has sufficient parking area presently to serve the new addition. Landscaping should be provide upon coiipletion of the addition that is equivalent to that which will be removed due to construction. Recomme ndation Approval, based on the above analysis and subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted for Staff review and approval prior to issuance of an occupancy permit providing for plantings adjacent to the northerly and westerly elevations of the new addition. 2. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. Plan Enclosed 1. Site and Building Elevations Staff dated 9- -15 -78 2 I 3M COMPANY IF-JITIONER BUILDING Rl:.Vlaj EOUEST r 970-78 ATE [SCALE 265 201 LABORATORY 207 ELI-C:T. PROD. DIV. LAD. 2011 PILOT PLANT 209 GRAPI IIC PROD. DIV. LAD. 210 DOILI - -R PLANT 216 ADVERTISING SERVICES OFFICE SUP. 210 EXPANSION OF PILOT PLANT 219 A.G. G S. NEW BUS. VENTURES LADS. 220 OI'PICE BLDG. 222 CAFETERIA - 223 NEW OFFICE BLDG. 224 OFFICE BLDG. 225 EMPLOYEES SERVICE BLDG. 227 PARKING RAMP 229 PARKING RAMP 230 TAPE LAB. 235 GRAPHIC PROD., LAB. 236 PILOT PLANT 240 ABRASIVE DEMO BLDG. 251 ABRASIVE LAB, 260 ELEC1'RO PRODUCIS -,1, : i 265 CAF E1 CRIA NORTH SIDE of )i i,I I I iI il f . ...... , _ Y J �li q I ` P : I I� I _ : � i I ' 1 I r ITr � I I s s Ir �� / -. J \! ".3ca � (� r',[ II ii1 ,C ,�s a il L I h I�._... I n J E 7� r i... 2„ :l Zi r VISITOR PARKING avo zze 1 11- 1 1 11 —I 222 e I- 3M CENTER` a tt t- u N i 3M COMPANY BUILDING /SITE -. REVIEW V ECUEST BUILDING 240 3M CENTER 9 -20 -78 DATE=_ SCALE'' 3M Company Board Member Sjolander moved the Board recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed addition to Building No. 240 at the 3M Center subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscaping plan shall be submitted for Staff review and approval prior to issuance of an occupancy permit providing For plantings adjacent to the northerly and westerly elevations of the new addition. 2. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. Board Member Haugan Seconded Ayes all. MEMO To: Mayor and City Council From: Acting City Manager Subject: Park Acquisition - Pleasantview Park Date: September 26, 1978 Ba ckground On July 6, 1978, the City Council authorized staff to negotiate for the purchase of 14 acres of park land just south of Southcrest Drive. Please find attached a copy of a letter from John Bannigan to Eric Blank outlining a purchase package from Mr. Waldron Douglas. As stated in the letter, the City currently has $25,000 in the 1978 Park Budget for land acquisition. ecommend Staff recommends the Council authorize the purchase of this land at a sale price of $52,500 at B% interest. Actj. by Jill C1U "_.•�., ?li.q LAIS, BANNIGAN & CIRESI, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 400 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 6TH AND CHOAH SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 155101 DONALD L. LAIS JOHN F. BANNIGAN. JR. JEROME D. CIRF.SI PATRICK J. KELLY September 18, 1978 Mr. Eric Blank c/o City of Maplewood 1380 Frost Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Proposed acquisition of Pleasantview lurk Dear Mr. Blank: AREA CODE 612 224.3'!01 I had been negotiating with Mr. Waldron W. Douglas, owner of the tract of land proposed for acquisition as Pleasantview Park. The initial offer of the City was $51,000 on a contract for Deed with as much as $25,000 down and 6% on the balance spread over five years. Mr. Douglas will accept $52,500 at 8% with 29 ($15,225.00) down and the balance over five years. I recommend this .set nt to the City. If we were to attempt to acquire the property by proceedings in eminent domain, the costs in legal and appraisal and survey services would exceed the difference. The difference in land content of .45 acres between our appraiser and Mr. Douglas would be expensive to resolve. Assuming that there is 15 acres, we are acquiring it at our appraised value per acre of $3,500.00. If we have your approval to proceed, please have the Mayor and Manager sign the enclosed Earnest Money Contract and forward it to me so that I might have Mr. Douglas execute it also. JFB:jnw encl 3. The sign shall. be removed fr house to meet the Sign Code; 4. A faire extinguisher shall be 5. Conditions number 3, 4, 6, 7 original approval of May 17, 6. Owner and applicant agree to 2. Councilman Anderson nn the front yard and mounted on the installed in the salon area; and g shall remain in force from the 1.973; the above conditions in writing. of the -home occupation at White Bear Avenu su bject to the followin conditions 1. The perm:i.t shall be reviewed every five years by the City Council; 2. The permit shall he subject to revocation by the City Council upon justified complaints; 3. The sign shall be removed from the front yard and mounted on the house to meet the Sign Code; 4. A fire extinguisher shall be installed in the salon area; 5. Conditions number 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 shall remain in force from the original approval of May 17, 1973; (Original conditions: 3. The permit shall not be transferable; 4. The permit shall be subject to revocation by the Village Council upon justified complaints; 6. No on- street parking by customers shall be encouraged, and an im- proved off - street parking area which is properly hard surfaced and landscaped shall be required on the property; 7. No expansion of the permit in any way shall occur without the approval of the Village Council; 8. Operation be limited to two chairs.) 6. Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing. Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all. 5. Park Acquisition - Pleasantview Park a. Manager Miller stated with development of the southern part of Maplewood just getting under way, staff feels that the City should begin to acquire future neigh- borhood park sites. Staff has located a parcel of land which would make an ideal neighborhood park site for the Highwood area. The area is located just south of the Pleasantview Park addition and west of the St. Paul Ski Club site. The City has currently approximately $25,000 in the Park Availability Charge fund for this area for such a purchase. A contract for deed purchase appears to be the best method of acquisition, as the $25,000 will. not cover the cost of the project. It is recommended that the Council authorize the staff to undertake negotiations for the park land and refer the matter to the Planning Commission for a Plan Change. b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following Planning Commission recommendation: ° Conmiissioner Pel.l.ish moved the Planning Commission find that the subject site is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. If the City Council decides to acquire this site for park land, the Council should amend the Land Use Plan designation. from RL, Low Density Residential to Open Space and Park Land. The designation of Park Land on the property to the east should then be removed. 29 - 7/6 L v Commissioner Kishel seconded. Ayes all." c. Councilman Wi.eger.t move to a uthoriz e staff: to undertake ne gotiat io ns for p ur- chase of the p ark la in ques t:i.ou. T Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. d. Mr. Dean Sherburne, 1O78 Marnie Street stated all the neighbors are in favor of the neighborhood park, with the possible restriction that Marnie Street will not be used as a public vehicle access, but a public pedestrian access to the area. e. Councilman Wiegert m oved to )-( the mat ter to the P lann ing C ommission hearin on the Land U se Plan clean e, Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 6. Nature Center •- Name a. Manager. Miller read the following recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission: "Commissioner Mahre moved that the Commission recommend the name of the so called Michael Lane area be the Maple Leaf Nature Center; seconded by Commissioner Chegwyn; Ayes: Commissioners Mahre, Chegwyn; and Christianson; Nays: Commissioners Delmont and Pil.eti_ch: Motion passed." b. Councilman Anderson moved to name the na ce nter - Maple Leaf Nature Center. c. Councilman Anderson withdrew his motion. d. Councilman Anderson moved to table this matter for further review. Seconded by Councilman Fontaine. Ayes - all. 7. 1977 Annual Financial Report a. Manager Miller stated the 1.977 Annual Financial Report and audit have recently been completed. Appraisal of the City's fixed assets and establishment of the computerized fixed asset management system by Marshall and Sevens, Inc, was the primary factor that caused the completion of the report to be one month later than last year. It is recommended that the Council accept the 1977 Annual Financial Report and schedule a meeting with our auditor (Bob Voto) to review the report. Bob Voto has indicated that lie would be able to attend the Council -Staff work session at 5:00 P.M. on July 1701. b. Councilman Wiegert m oved to accept the 1977 annual f re port and _s_chedu_1.e a meet:i.i w 9_fh the auditors on Monday, July 1:7 at 5::00 P.M. (Council work shop sessio to rev the report. Seconded by Councilman Anderson. Ayes - all. 8. Planning Commission - Appointment a. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the following, Planning Commission recomme- ndtion: