HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993 10-11 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, October 11, 1993
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No, 93 -22
AG CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 93 -21 (September 27, 1993)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA. PRESENTATIONS
1. Human Relations Commission Appointment
F. CONSENT AGENDA
• Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City
All matters listed under the Conse g on these
• enacted b one motion. There will be no separate discussion
Council and will be ena y • item, items.
If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an i , that item w i l l be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation
3, Final Payment - Seal Coating
4. Certification of Election Judges
5. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2305 Stillwater Road (Sarrack's)
6. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2696 Hazelwood Avenue
7. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1177 N. Century Avenue (East Co. Line Fire Station)
8. Conditional Use Permit Review: Highway 61 (Carnival Play Systems)
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1, 7:00 P.M., Street Vacation: Flandrau Street
H. AWARD OF BIDS
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
to Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility
Alley Vacation
Street Vacation
Rezoning
Lot Sale
Density Variance
Parking Space Reduction
Approve the Plans
Tax - Exempt Financing
2. Construction Agreement: Kennard Street, North of Co. Road C (Lukin)
3. St. Paul Metro Treatment Center,
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Termination of Deferments on Special Assessments
2,
3.
4,
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Truth -In- Housing Ordinance Amendment (1st Reading)
Charitable Gambling Funds Request
Community Center Change Order: UP Number 1
No-Parking - Price Street East of Ruth
Sterling /Schaller Public Improvement Petition
Handicap Parking - Kennard Street
County Road B Bus Stop
Budget Transfer - Highwood & Century
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
N. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7 :00 P.M., Monday, September 27, 1993
6ouncil Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting-No. 93 -21
A. CALL.TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL _CA
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present
Dale.H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Frances L. Juker, CouncA--Ime - -- Rre�n -t- -- - - -----
-- - - - - - --
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present
Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
1. Minutes of Council /Manag Workshop September 7, 1993
Counci 1 member Zappa moved to approve the mi nutes of Counci 1 /Manager .Workshop
(September 7. 1993 ) as p resented.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa
Nays - None
Abstain - Councilmember Ju ker
2. Minutes of Meeting 93 -20 (September 13, 1993)
Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 93 -20
( September .13, 1993) as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
L1 Kayser Property
L2 Boom Boxes
L3 Mayor's Update
.Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes.- all
1 9 -27 -93
EA. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
1. Commendations - William Mikiska and Robert Bade
a. Mayor Bastian presented William Mi ki ska and Robert Bade with the
commendation plaques awarded by the Governor's Office for their efforts
during the St. Paul floods of June 25, 26 and 27, 1993.
2. Proclamation —1993 Minnesota Manufacturing Week
a. Mayor Bastian introduced the followin4 Proclamation and moved its
adoption:
PROCLAMATION
1993 MINNESOTA MANUFACTURING WEEK
October 18 - 22, 1993
WHEREAS, manufacturing employs one out of every five off -farm workers in
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any sector in
Minnesota, and the second highest average wage; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing produces $19.8 billion for Minnesota's economy
which is the largest single share (21%). of our gross State product; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing exports brought nearly $6.7 billion into the
State in 1992; and
WHEREAS, manufacturing businesses within the City of Maplewood
contribute to the financial stability and high quality of life in our
community; and
WHEREAS, some of the leaders in the manufacturing industry are located
within the City of Maplewood providing employment opportunities for
'residents, enhancing the City's commercial property tax base, and
contributing to the welfare of the citizens through community service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Maplewood does hereby proclaim the week of October 18 through October 22,
1993 as 1993 MINNESOTA MANUFACTURING WEEK in honor and recognition of the
contributions made by Minnesota's manufacturing industries.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
F. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Zappa moved, seconded by Councilmember Juker: ayes - all, to
approve the consent agenda items F -1 thru F -9 and F -11 thru F -14 as
recommended. {Item F -10 moved to become J -7),_
2 9 -27 -93
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $1,505,965.07.
287.873.55
$1,793,838.62
PAYROLL: 204,323.55
S 46,232.89
$ 250
52,044,505.06
2. East Twins Gambling Permit
93 09 - 124
Checks #1385 - #1.458
Dated 9 -1 -93 thru 9 -15 -93
Checks #11107 - #11235
Dated 9 -27 -93
Total per attached voucher /check
register
Payroll Checks #36348 thru #36714
Dated 9 -10 -93
Payroll Deduction Checks #36719 thru
#36734 dated 9 -10 -93
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
.APPROVING CHARITABLE GANBLING
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota* that
the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for the East Twins Babe
Ruth League to be located at the Keller Lake Lounge, 2280 Maplewood Drive.
FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling
Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit
application as being in compliance with Minn. Statutes No. 349.213.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City
Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control
Division for their approval.
3. Conditional Use Permit Review: 743 N. Century Ave. (Holiday Express Station)
Reviewed and approved a one -year renewal of the Conditional Use Permit at
743 Century Avenue allowing the expansion of the fuel station canopy, an
additional pump island and removal of five feet of the building front. T h i s
CUP is required because the expansion is within 350 feet of a residential
district.
4. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1255 East Cope Avenue (Northern Hydraulics)
Reviewed and approved a one -year renewal of the Conditional Use Permit at
1255 East Cope Avenue which allows a commercial building within 350 feet of
a .residential district.
5. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2650 White Bear Avenue (Harmony School)
Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit at 2650 White
Bear Avenue for non - profit, education - related and child -care uses.
Independent School District 622 is operating a kindergarten school program,
special education and community education programs at this site.
3 9 -27 -93
6. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1735. Kennard Street (Presentation Child Care)
Reviewed and approved.a five -year renewal of the Conditional Use Permit at
1735 Kennard Street where Presentation Church is operating a day care
center.
7. Sterling Street, Project 87 -45 - Change Order
93 -09 -125
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered
made Sterling Street Improvements, Improvement Project 87 -45, and has let a
construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be
modified and designated as Improvement Project 87 -45, Change Order 4.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed
to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 4 in the
amount of $1,724.25
The project budget is amended to $1,119,830.00. The project financing
is amended as follows:
Special assessments $ 437
WAC Fund 200
MSA 456,664 38
General Obligation
Total $1,119,830.00
8. Budget Adjustment For CDBG Funds
Authorized increasing the appropriate revenue and expenditure accounts by $3,750 to
reflect the acceptance and disbursement of the Community Development Block Grant
funds received from Ramsey County for the lobby power assist doors.
9. Budget Transfer Request - Building Maintenance
Approved the transfer of $7,70O.from the General Fund Contingency Account to
the Building Maintenance Department budget to pay for miscellaneous
unanticipated building and grounds expenses.
10. ADA Compliance Survey
MOVED TO BECOME J -7
4 9 -27 -93
11. Hon- Discrimination /Sexual Harassment Policy Revision
Approved proposed revisions to the Non - .Discrimination and Sexual Harassment
policies, reflecting the 1993 Legislative change which expanded the
protection of the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
129 1993 Fire Department Contracts - Third Quarter Payments
Authorized third quarter .contract payments to the Fire Departments, based
upon the amounts in the 1992 contracts.
13. Resignation - Park and Recreation Commissioner
Authorized staff to advertise for the open position on the Park and
Recreation Commission created by the September 20th resignation of
Commissioner Mavis Hawkins whose would have expired on December 31,
1994.
14..Assessment Appeal Settlement - Pinotti
93 - 09 - 126
SETTLEMENT OF ASSESSMENT - DONNA FAE PINOTTI . PROJECT 86 -27
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
City Council met, heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for construction of Larpenteur Avenue East from I -35E to Edgerton
street as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 86 -27, passed
on September 14, 1992.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429, Donna Fae Pinotti filed a Notice of
Appeal with respect to PIN No. 17- 29 -22 -33 -0036 in the amount of $1,625.00.
WHEREAS, the assessment appeal was duly scheduled in Ramsey County
District Court on August 4, 1993, at 9:00 a.m. as Court File No. C1 -92-
12658.
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood and Donna Fae Pinotti entered into a
Stipulation of Settlement in order to avoid protracted and continued
l i t i g a t i o n and additional costs for a final determination of benefit.
WHEREAS, Donna Fae Pinotti has agreed to .a reassessment of its parcel
known as 17- 29 -22 -33 -0036, also known as 1686 Arkwright Street, Maplewood,
Minnesota, in the amount of $800.00 which represents residential street of
$300.00 and storm sewer of $500.00.
WHEREAS, Donna Fae Pinotti has waived through Stipulation the
requirements for notice and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071, Subd.
2.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Maplewood,
Minnesota, as follows:
The following parcel, 17- 29- 22- 33.0036, located in the City
of Maplewood.be vacated by $825.00 from $1,625.00 and that
the reassessment for the parcel (PIN No. 17- 29- 22 -.33- 0036,
also known as 1686 Arkwright Street) be in the amount of
$800.00 which represents residential street ($300.00) and
storm sewer ($500,00).,
Reassessment for PIN No. 17- 29 -22 -33 -0036 is $800.00
5 9 -27 -93
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. (79005 P.M), Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility
Alley Vacation Street Vacation
Rezoning Lot Sale
Density Variance Parking Space Reduction
.Approve the Plans Tax - Exempt Financing
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
proposal from Volunteers of America to build a 66 -unit assisted care
facility near the intersection. of Cope Avenue and White Bear Avenue.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
report.
e. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report.
f. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
g. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard.-
Jeff Anderson, Chief Financial Officer for VOA
Jerome Ritter, Attorney representing the applicant
Jay Harkins, Architect
Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan
Jerome and Maureen Daines
MAYOR BASTIAN EXCUSED HIMSELF FROM THE MEETING
h. Acting Mayor Juker closed the public hearing.
i . Coun-ci l member Zappa moved to approve the request providing the VOA
purchase the City owned property and the Daines property, and if they
have difficulty with the expense they are to come back before the
Council.
NOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND
j . Council member Zappa moved to table this item for two weeks, to October
11. 1993.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
2. 7:30 P.M. (8:46 P.M.): Canada Woods
a. Acting Mayor Juker convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding
a proposal from North Suburban Development, Inc. to develop lots for
fourteen homes along Walter Street, South of county Road D.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
6 9 -27 -93
d. Commissioner Kittridge presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard.
Ken Gust, Civil Engineer, representing the developer
Radmilla Popov, representing the seller of the property
Patrick Connolly, representing 1070 E. County Road C
NAYOR BASTIAN RETURNED TO ASSUNE THE CHAIR
f Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Zappa moved to deny the pro.ect.and refer to developers
for an improved Dl an.
NOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND
Lot Width Variances
h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
93 - 09 - 127
LOT WIDTH VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Mr. Jack Menkveld, representing North Suburban Development,
Inca applied for a variance from the City Code.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, Canada Woods
East.
WHEREAS, Section 36 -69 of the Maplewood Code of ordinances requires a
mini mum ' 1 of width of seventy -five feet at the building setback l i n e .
WHEREAS, Mr. Menkvel d is proposing two lots that are 60 feet wide at the
building setback line.
WHEREAS, this requires lot -width variances of 15 feet on each lot.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve these variances.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993. City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and . sent notices to
the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing an Opportunity to speak and present written
statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described variances for the following reasons.
1. The variances are because of circumstances that are unique to the
property. The owner did not cause these circumstances.
7 9 -27 -93
2. The variances would not change the neighborhood's character.
3. The variances would meet the ordinance's intent since the lot width
at the back of the lots would exceed the minimum Code requirement.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker,
Rossbach
Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Zappa
Increased Front Setbacks
i. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the request. for a front setback
of 185 feet for Lot 6. Block Two: 290 feet for Lot 7. Block Two and 140
feet for Lot 7. Block One. .The property owners must provide an all
.weather driveway to each house.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker,
Rossbach
Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Zappa
South - Facing Houses
j .
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve. South - Facing houses on Lots 6 and
7. Block Two and on Lot 7. Block One. The house on Lot 7, Block One
shall be built up to the NSP easement.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker,
Rossbach
Nays —Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Zappa
Rear Yard Setback Variances
k. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
93 - 09 - 128
REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE RESOLUTION
. WHEREAS, North Suburban Development, Inc. applied for variances from the
City Code.
WHEREAS, these variances apply to Lots 6 and 7, Block 2 of Canada Woods
East.
WHEREAS, the City Code requires a rear yard setback of 20% of the lot
depth.
WHEREAS, the houses on the above lots would be within that setback.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that
the City Council approve these variances.
8 9 -27 -93
2* The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993.
City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law.
The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak
and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council allow homes on
these lots to use side yard setbacks from the rear lot lines for the
following reasons:
1. The variances are because of circumstances that are unique to
the property. The owner did not cause these circumstances.
2. The variances would not change the neighborhood's character.
3. The variances would meet the ordinance's intent, since the homes
would face south and have larger rear yards with the variances.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker,
Rossbach
Nays - Mayor Bastian, Council member
Zappa
Preliminary Plat
1. Counci 1 member Carlson moved to approve the Prel .i m„_y, Plat for Canada
Woods East Addition. The ,_,developer shall complete the follow__in4
conditions before approval of the Final P1=
a. Obtain the City Engineer's approval of final construction and
engineering plans. These plans shall include the utilities,
grading, drainage and erosion control plans. The erosion control
plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water
Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook.
b. The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along
all property lines. These easements shall be at least ten feet
wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide
on the side property lines.
co Record covenants or deed restrictions with the final plat that:
1) Prohibit the construction of a house or its attachments
within 100 feet of a pipeline,
2) Require the builders of the houses on Lots 1, 2 6 and
7. Block 2 to install and maintain driveways and
driveway turn - grounds with the construction of the
houses.
3) Include the following statement for each lot next to the
NSP high - voltage power line easement:
This property is next to high voltage
transmission lines. Purchasers should be
aware that there is ongoing research on
adverse exposure to a magnetic field
9 9 -27 -93
generated by high - voltage lines. As of May
1990, scientific or health officials have
made no risk assessments to resolve the
health effects of long or short term
exposures to magnetic fields.. Purchasers
with concerns about the exposures should
contact competent medical or health
inspectors or agencies for current risk
assessment information.
4) If the developer decides to final plat part of the
preliminary plat, the City may waive any conditions that
do not apply to the final plat.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers
Rossbach
.Nays - Mayor Bastian,
Zappa
Rezoning
Carl son, Juker,
Councilmember
M. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
93 - 09 - 129
I ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development is proposing that the
City change the zoning map from F (farm residential) to R -1 (single
dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the properties located south of County
Road D. between the Little Canada border and 1034 County Road D. The legal
descriptions of these properties are:
Except the west 200 feet of the north 433 feet and except the east
20 acres, the north 639.8 feet of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 (subject
to roads and easements) ion Section 29, Township 29 Range 22
WHEREAS, the history of this change is. as follows:
1. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that
the City Council approve this change.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993*
City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present
written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and P1 anni ng Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and
intent of the zoning code.
10 9 -27 -93
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract
from the use of ne,i ghbori ng property or from the character of
the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to
the area included in.the proposed change or plan is adequately
m
safeguarded .
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and
conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public
wel fare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the
logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services
and facilities, such as public water, sewers police and fire
.protection and schools.
5. The proposed change would be consistent with the proposed
development and with the land use plan.
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all
3. 7:50 P.M. (9:51 P.M.): Conditional Use Permit: 2610 Highway 611 (Mitsubishi)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
request from Rick Kline of White Bear Mitsubishi for a permit to expand
an existing maintenance garage in Order to add an Oldsmobile franchise.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Kittridge presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
David Phillips, representing the applicant
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its
. adoption:
93 - 09 - 130
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Rick Kline applied for a conditional use permit to expand an
automobile maintenance garage within 350 feet of a residential lot line.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2610 Highway 61. The legal description
is:
Speiser's Arbolada, subject to road and easements and vacated road,
accruing and except Northeasterly 3 feet; Lot 12, also part of Lots
5 and 10 lying northerly of a line 240 feet northerly of and par
with the South line of Block 1 and all of Lot 4 and Lot 11 Block 1.
and
11 9, -27 -93
Speiser's Arbolada, subject to road and easements and the vacated
road accruing; part of Lots 5 and 10 lying southerly of a line 240
feet northerly of and par with the south line of Block 1 and all of
Lots 6 through Lot 9, Block 1.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On September 20, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that
the City Council approve this permit.
2. The City Council held a public hearing'
ear i ng ' on September 27, 1993*
City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to
the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described conditional use permit, because.
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of
the surrounding area
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -
off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference
or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access
on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
s i te' s natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. There would not be a significant affect on the development of
the parcel as zoned.
Approval is subject to the following conditions.
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City
stamped August 4, 1993. The Director of Community Development
may approve minor changes.
12 9 -27 -93
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within
,- one year of council approval or the permit shall end. The
Council may grant up to one one -year extension of the permit.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. Property owner to clean up and maintain his property on County
Road C and Highway 61 within 6 months or occupancy permit will
not be issued.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
H. AWARD OF BIDS
NONE
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Gervais Avenue - Project 88 -14: Assessment Objections
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Zappa moved that no ,adjustments be made to the assessment
roll of . Project 88 -14, Gervais Avenue.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
MAYOR BASTIAN CALLED FOR A 5 MINUTE RECESS
MAYOR BASTIAN RECONVENED THE MEETING AT 10 :07 P.M.
2. Liquor Ordinance (2nd Reading)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Safety Collins presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Ordinance and moved its
adoption:
ORDINANCE N0, 713
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MAPLEWOOD'S ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ORDINANCE
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 5 -5 is amended to read as follows:
Sec. 5 -5. Drinking 3.2% alcohol, beer or intoxicating liquor on
public streets, public property, while trespassing on private
property.
No person shall, upon the public streets, and public property, or
being trespasser upon the private premises of another, drink 3.2%
alcohol, beer or intoxicating liquor.
Sec. 5 -22. - Hours of Sal -e -, Hours-of Consumption. - - - No 3.2% malt liquor
13 9 -21 -93
Section 5 -21 definitions is hereby amended to read:
3.2% malt liquor; 3.2% malt liquor is malt liquor containing not
less than one -half of one percent of alcohol by volume. No more
than 3.2% alcohol by weight.
r
Section III, 5 -22 Hours of Sale, Hours of Consumption is amended to
read:'
No 3.2% malt liquor shall be sold in the City between 1 :00 A.M. and
12:00 noon on Sundays.
No "on -sale" licensee shall permit 3.2% malt liquor to be consumed
on the licensed premises during the hours when the sale thereof is
prohibited by this section; provided, however, that the licensee
shall be allowed a 30- minutes peri-od following the 1:00 A.M. closing
hour to clear the premises of customers who are on the premises at
1:00 A.M. and such customers during that time may consume 3.2% malt
liquor beverages purchased by them before 1:00 A.M.
Section IV, Section 5 -23. Persons under 21 years; sale to, consumption
by, procuring for; etc. shall be amended to read as follows:
It is unlawful in the City for a:
(1) Licensee or the licensee's employee to sell or serve 3.2% malt
liquor to a person under the age of 21 years or to permit a
person under the age of 21 years to consume 3.2% malt liquor on
the licensed premises;
(2) Person other than the parent or legal guardian to procure 3.2%
malt liquor for a person under the age of 21 years;
(3) Person to induce a person under the age of 21 years to purchase
or procure 3.2% malt liquor.
(4) Person under the age of 21 years to claim to be 21 years or
older for the purpose of obtaining 3.2 malt liquor;
(5) Person under the age of 21 years to consume any 3.2% malt liquor
unless in the company of the person's parent or guardian;
(6) Person under the age of 21 years to possess any 3.2% malt
liquor, with intent to consume it at a place other than the
household of the person's parent or guardian. Possession at a
place other than the household of the person's parent or
guardian is prima facie evidence of intent to consume it at a
place other than the household of the parent or guardian.
Sec. 5 -24 is hereby amended:
Sec. 5 -24. Person must be 21 years of age to deliver, sell, serve
or vend 3.2% malt liquor.
(a) It is unlawful for a person under the age of 21 years to
deliver, sell, serve or vend 3.2% malt liquor to a person in the
City.
(b) It is unlawful for a person under the age of 21 years to
del fiver, sell, serve or vend 3.2% malt 1 iquor to a person in the
City.
Sec. 5 -36. Required to sell at retail; types of licenses.
Except as provided in this section, it is unlawful to sell non-
intoxicating malt liquors at retail in the City except when licenses
14 9 -27 -93
under this article. Two types of annual licenses are issued for the
sale of 3.2% malt liquors;
(1) "on- -sale" licenses permit the licensee to sell 3.2% malt liquors
• for consumption on the licenses premises, and the license fee
therefor is fixed by the City Council and paid to the City.
"On-sale" licenses are granted only to drug stores, restaurants,
hotels, bona fide clubs, and establishments for the sale of 3.2%
malt beverages, and soft drinks at retail. A cl ub or
charitable, religious, or non - profit organization may be issued
a temporary "on -sale" license for the sale of 3.2% malt liquor
on and off school grounds, and in and out of school - houses and
school buildings. Temporary licenses are subject to such terms,
including a license fee as the City Council prescribes.
(2) "Off- sale" licenses permit the licensee to sell 3.2% malt
liquors i n the original packages for consumption off the
premises only, and the license fee therefor .is fixed by the City
Council and paid to the City.
Section 5 -35 shall be amended to read:
Section. 5 -35. Persons eligible to be issued licenses.
Licenses under this article may be issued only to persons who are
citizens of the United States or resident aliens and who are of good
moral character and repute, who have attained the age of 21 years
and who are managers of the establishments for which the licenses
are issued. In the. event that a corporation or partnership is the
owner of the establishment, then the licenses shall then be issued
to the primary and acting manager of the establishment and the
designated corporate officer or in- the case of a partnership a
designated partner. The corporation or partnership which is the
owner of an establishment shall notify the City within 48 hours if
the person licensed as the primary and acting manager of the
establishment can no longer perform the duties of a primary and
acting manager. This includes but is not limited to reassignment,
termination, or demotion. The corporation or partnership shall
immediately have the new primary and acting manager apply for a
license.
Sec. 5 -37. Persons not eligible to be issued licenses.
No license may be issued to:
(1) No license may be issued to a person who has had an intoxicating
liquor or 3.2% liquor license revoked within five years of the
license application.
Sec. 5 -38. Premises which may not be licensed; 1 imi tati ons on number of
licenses.
(a) No "on- sale" or "off -sale" 3.2% malt beverage license may be
issued under this article to premises licenses as a motor fuel
station, motor fuel station convenience store, internal motor
fuel station, major motor fuel station or truck stop, as defined
in Section 36 -151 of this Code.
(b) No 3.2% malt liquor license may be issued under this article for
premises located within an area wherein such use of the premises
is prohibited by the zoning ordinance, nor within an area where
15 9 -27 -93
such sales are forbidden by state law or any other ordinance of
the City.
(c) No "on -sale" license may be issued under this article for
premises located within 100 feet of a church or school building
located in - the.City, and no "off -sale" license shall be issued
for premises located within 100 feet of a church or school
building. The distance is to be measured from the main entrance
of the licenses premises to the nearest property line of said
church or school.
Sec. 5 -41. Unlawful. possession by licensee, agent, etc., of 3.2% malt
liquor and intoxicating U quor on licenses premises.
It is unlawful for a person licenses under this article, but not
licenses to sell 3.2% malt 1 i.quor and intoxicating liquor, and for
any of the person's agents, or employees to possess on premises
licensed under this article, intoxicating liquor, as defined in
Section 340A.101, Minnesota Statutes, for the purpose of consumption
by anyone.
Sec. 5 -43, Application - Generally.
A person seeking a license under this article must apply to the City
Council for the license by filing a written application with the
City Clerk. The City Clerk must present the application to the City
Council. An application must contain the following:
(1) The applicant's name and place
(2) The exact location of the place
to sell 3.2% malt liquors.
(3) Whether the applicant has ever
business of selling 3.2% malt
selling foodstuffs in the City,
of residence.
at which the applicant proposes
previously been engaged in the
liquors or in the business of
and if so, when and where.
Sec. 5 -72. Persons eligible to be issued licenses.
Licenses under this article may be issued only to persons who are
c i t i ien s of the United States or resident aliens and who are of good
moral character and repute, who have attained the age of 21 years
and who are managers of the establishments for which the licenses
are issued. In the event that a corporation or partnership is the
owner of the establishment, then the licenses shall then be issued
to the primary and acting manager of the establishment and the
designated corporate officer or in the case of a partnership a
designated partner. The corporation or partnership which is the
owner of an establishment shall notify the City within 48 hours if
the person licenses as the primary and acting manager of the
establishment can no longer perform the duties of a primary and
acting manager. Th i. s includes but is not limited to reassignment,
termination, or demotion. The corporation or partnership shall
immediately have the new primary and acting manager apply for a
license.
Sec. 5 -76. No more than one license for any one person or premises;
(a) No more than one off -sale or on -sale intoxicating liquor license
may be issued to any one person or for any one place.
(b) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly have or possess an
interest in more than one license in the City and upon
16 9 -27 -93
conviction therefor the City Council may immediately revoke all
licenses of the person The term "interest as used in this
section, shall be as defined in Section 340A.412, Subd 3,
Minnesota Statutes.
R Sec. 5 -83. Transfers of licenses; change of corporate officers.
(a) No license granted under this article may be transferred from
person to person or from place to place without the consent of
the Council, which consent shall be by resolution passed by the
Council,
Sec. 5 -84. Suspension or revocation of license issued under article.
The authority issuing or approving a license or permit pursuant to
chapter 340A, Minnesota Statutes and this article may suspend for up
to 60 days or revoke the license or permit or impose a fine of up to
$2,000 for each violation, on a finding that the licensee or permit
holder has violated an applicable statute, regulation or ordinance
relating to intoxicating liquor. No suspension or revocation shall
-take effect until the licensee or permit holder has been .afforded an
opportunity for a hearing pursuant to Sections 14.57 to 14.69 of the
Administrative Procedure Act. The hearing shall be before an
Administrative Law Judge pursuant to the Administrative Procedure
Act and all costs and expenses associated with.the hearing shall be
paid by the licensee., Said licensee may elect said hearing within
five days after the notice of intent to suspend or revoke is issued.
If licensee elects said hearing shall be held at the earliest
available date.
Sec. 5 -110. Certain premises ineligible for license,
(a) No "on -sale" license may b issued for the first time under this
division for premises located within 100 feet of a church or
school building in the City. Said measurement shall be from the
main entrance to the nearest property line of said church or
school building.
(b) No "off -sale" license may be issued for the first time under
this division for premises located within 100 feet of a church
or school building in the City. Said distance shall be measured
from the main entrance to the nearest property line of said
church or school building.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson . Ayes - all
3. Animal Control Ordinance (2nd Reading)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Safety Collins presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following was heard:
Jill Munson, Assistant Director, St. Paul Humane Society
17 9 -27 -93
d. Councilmember Carlson moved to include an amendment to Sec. 7 -5. (b) as
follows o.- "nor animals kept on a temporary basis of n more than 21 days for
purposes of veterinary care: nor. does it apply to those individuals designated as
foster care homes by the Humane Society, said foster care services shall be limited
to 21 days."
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Council members Carlson, Juker,
Rossbach, Zappa
Nays - Mayor Bastian
e. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Ordinance and.moved its
adoption.
ORDINANCE NO. 714
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MAPLEWOOD'S ANIMAL ORDINANCE
Chapter 7
Sec. 7 -3. Quarantine of animal which has bitten a person; destruction of rabid animals.
(a) An y g do or other animal that has bitten a person and caused an abrasion or
puncture of the skin shall immediately be quarantined for a minimum of ten (10)
days. Such an animal shall be confined at a veterinary hospital or at the
owner's home in such a manner that it does not escape or come in contact with
other eo l e or animals . When the dog or animal i s. quarantined as stated above,
P P
it shall be at the owner 9 s expense., A quarantine report must be completed by the
local animal control agency. Stray animals that have bitten a person shall be
quarantined through the local animal control agency. Dogs that are involved in
two (2) or more bites are subject to Sec. 7 -80 and Sec. 7 -81.
(b) No police officer or other person shall kill, or cause to be killed, any animal
suspected of being rabid, except after the animal has been placed in quarantine
P g
and the diagnosis of rabies made. (Code 1965, § 1101.140).
Sec. 7 -4.. Keeping of animals.
For the purpose of this section, the following words, terms and phrases shall have
the following respective meanings ascribed to them:
Wild or exotic animal: "Wild animal" or "exotic animal" means any mammal,
amphibian, reptile or bird which is of a species not usually domesticated and of a
species which, due to size, wild nature or other characteristic, is dangerous to
humans, The term includes animals and birds, the keeping of which is licensed by the
state or federal government, such as wolves, raptors and pheasants. By way of
example and not of limitation, the term includes: snakes, eagles, ocelots, jaguars,
cougars, weasels, ferrets, badgers, monkeys, chimpanzees, deer and bison. The term
also includes crossbreeds such as the cross between dogs and coyotes and dogs and
wolves.
Sec. 7 -5. Keeping of certain animals absolutely prohibited; exceptions.
(a) Prohibited animals. No person shall keep, maintain or harbor within the City of
Maplewood any of the following animals:
(1) Any animal or species prohibited by federal or Minnesota law.
(2) Any exotic animal or species when kept in such numbers or in such a way
as to constitute a likelihood of harm to the animals themselves, to
human beings or to the property of human beings, or which constitutes a
public or private nuisance.
18 9 -27 -93
(3) Any skunk, whether captured in the wild, domestically raised, descented
or not descented, vaccinated against rabies or not vaccinated against
I
rabies.
(4) Any large cat or members of the family Fel idae, such as lions, tigers,
1. jaguars, leopards, cougars and ocelots, except commonly accepted
domesticated cats.
(5) Any member of the family Canidae, such as wolves, dingoes, coyotes and
jackals, except domesticated dogs.
(6) Any crossbreed such as the crossbreed between dogs and coyotes and dogs
and wolves.
(7) Any raccoon.
(8) Any red -eared turtle (Pseudemys scriptaelegans) with a shell length of
less than four (4) inches.
(9) Any Vietnamese pot - bellied pig.
(b) Exceptions. This section does not apply to animals which are temporarily brought
into the city for the purpose of participating in any circus or show; nor does
it apply to any public zoo or persons keeping animals for a public zoo as
volunteers, Docents or otherwise; nor to any bona fide research institution or
veterinary hospital , provided protective devices. adequate to prevent such animal
from escaping or injuring the public are provided; nor animals kept on a
temporary basis. of not more than 21 days for purposes of veterinary care; nor
does it apply to those individuals designated as foster care homes by the Humane
Society, said foster care services shall be limited to 21 days.
Sec. 7 -6. Impoundment of wild or exotic animals.
Any wild animal kept in violation of this ordinance may be impounded by the city.
Unless such impounded animal is reclaimed and removed from the city or issued a
permit to allow it to remain in the city or unless the owner petitions the District
Court for a determination that the animal is exempt from the provisions of t h i s
ordinance, the animal may be destroyed or sold seven (7) days following notice to the
owner of such animal of its impoundment and the provisions of this ordinance. Any
person reclaiming any such animal shall pay the costs of impounding and boarding the
same at the time of its release.
DIVISION 6. SMALL KENNEL LICENSES
Sec. 7 -96. Construction and purpose of division.
This division is supplementary to and in addition to all other provisions of t h i s
Code or other ordinances in effect relating to the ownership, care and custody of
dogs within the city and is deemed necessary by the council in order to regulate and
control the ownership and the keeping of dogs in and near residential areas of the
city. (Code 1965, § 1103.010)0
Sec. 7 -97. Required; limited to licensee's dogs; zoning classifications where permitted.
(a) No person shall keep more than two (2) dogs over three (3) months of age anywhere
within the city without first obtaining a small kennel license under this
division for the keeping of such dogs for breeding, sale or show purposes.
19 9 -27 -93
(b) Any licensee under this division may not board or train dogs belonging to other
persons on such licensed premises.
(c) Small kennel licenses will not be issued under this division in any part of the
city, except on property zoned commercial or farm residential or residential R -1.
(Code 1965, §§ 1103.030, 1103.040; Ord. No. b71, § 1 9- 24 -90)0
Sec. 7 -98. Application; investigation; grant or denial of license.
(a)Application. Any person desiring a small kennel license required under the
provisions of Section 7 -97 shall make written application therefor to the city clerk
upon a - form prescribed by and containing such information as required by the city
clerk. Among other things, the application shall contain the following information:
(1) A description of the real property upon which it is desired to keep the
animal or animals.
(2) The species and number of animals to be maintained on the premises.
(3) A statement that the applicant /permittee will at all times keep the
animals in accordance with all the conditions prescribed by the director
of public safety, or a modification thereof, and that failure to obey
such conditions will constitute a violation of the provisions of this
chapter and grounds for cancellation of the permit.
(4) Such other and further information as may be required by the Director of
Public Safety.
(b) Consent. The applicant for any permit required under the provisions of Section
7 -97 shall provide with the application the written consent of seventy -five (75)
percent of the owners or occupants of privately or publicly owned real estate
within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the outer boundaries of the premises for
which the permit is being requested or, in the alternative, proof that
applicant's property lines are one hundred fifty (150) feet or more from any
structure. However, where a street separates the premises for which the permit
is being requested from other neighboring property, no consent is required from
the owners or occupants of property located on the opposite side of the street.
Where a property within one hundred fifty (150) feet consists of a multiple
dwelling, the applicant need obtain only the written consent of the owner or
manager or other person in charge of the building.
(c) Investigation by the director of public safety; may grant permit. The director
of public safety shall make such investigation as is necessary and may grant,
deny or refuse to renew any application for permit under this chapter.
(d) Permit; conditions. If granted, the permit shall be issued by the City Clerk and
shall state the conditions, if any, imposed upon the permittee for the keeping
of animals under the permit. The permit shall specify the restrictions,
limitations, conditions and prohibitions which the Director of Public Safety
deems reasonably necessary to.protect any person or neighboring use from
unsanitary conditions, unreasonable noise or odors or annoyance or to protect the
public health and safety. Such permit may be modified from time to time or
revoked by the director of public safety for failure to conform to such
restrictions, limitations or prohibitions, Such modification or revocation shall
be effective from and after ten (10) days following the mailing of written notice
thereof by certified mail to the person or persons keeping or maintaining such
animals.
20 9 -27 -93
(e) Outs i de kennel An outs i de kennel must be constructed of open -f aced, galvanized
fabric of suitable size to maintain and secure the keeping of particular breeds
of dogs and to allow for sufficient space for particular breeds of dogs to
exercise freely. Surface must be constructed of maternal of either concrete or
gravel of sufficient depth to provide for proper cleaning, drainage, maintenance
and needs of all particular breeds of dogs.
(f) Refusal to grant or renew .a permit. The Director of Public Safety may refuse a
permit to keep or maintain animals hereunder for failure to comply with the
provi s i ons of this chapter, if the facilities for the keeping of the animal s are
or become inadequate for their purpose, if the -conditions of the permit are not
.met, i f a nui sance condi ti on i s. created, or i f the publ i c heal th and safety woul d
be unreasonably endangered by the granting of such permit. Refusal to.grant or
renew a small kennel license by the Director of Public Safety may be appealed to
the City Council.
Sec. 7 -99. Application and renewal fees.
The initial application fee for a small kennel license under t h i s division shall be
imposed, set, established and fixed by the City Council, by resolution, from time to
time, and the annual renewal fee for any license i ssued under this division shall be
imposed, set, established and fixed by the City Council, by resolution, from time to
time. (Code 1965, § 1103.080).
Sec. 7 -100. Limitation on number of dogs over three months of age that may be
kept on licensed premises.
The maximum number of dogs over three (3) months of age which may be kept under a
small kennel license issued under this division shall be three (3). (Code 1965, §
1103..050).
Secs. 7- 101 - -7 -115. Reserved.
f. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct staff to study licensing and
impounding fees vs other communities our size, and in different areas_
Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all
COUNC I LMEMBER ZAPPA MOVED TO WAIVE THE RULES OF PROCEDURE TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL
THE AGENDA IS COMPLETED
SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JUKER AYES - ALL
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. St. Paul Metro Treatment Center (Methadone Clinic)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Bob Parsons, 2229 Prosperity Road
Kelly Phillips, Faegre and Benson, Attorney
Rosemary McNally, Director of the Clinic
Rod Daimer, Golden Valley Police Department
Joe Fleming, Fleming's Service Center
Lori LaBey, 1158 Lark
21 9 -27 -93
c. Councilmember Zappa moved to monitor the Clinic for 60 days.
NOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND
d. Councilmember Rossbach moved to direct staff.to place No Parking s
on Prosperity from Lark , to County Road B: to meet with designated
members of the communit to research conditions ( i ncl.ud i ng looking at
a� d.1.l�
Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all
e. Councilmember Zappa moved. to direct staff to research. the zon issue
. to restrict clinics .in areas: studv possibi:l itw of licensing of clinics.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all
2. Larpenteur and English - 4 -Way Stop Sign Request
a.. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker moved to request Ramsey County Traffic Engineering
Division to analyze the intersection for possible addition of four -way
sow.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
3. Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Beth Heights
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Zappa moved to grant a time extension for the Beth Hei a_ hts
Preliminary Plat subject to the following amended conditions:
1) Have the City Engineer approve final construction plans. These
plans shall include the grading, utility, drainage, erosion
control, tree and street plans. These plans shall meet the
following conditions:
a) The grading plan shall show the depth and location of
the Williams Brothers pipelines.
b) For the sedimentation basins:
(1) Each basin shall provide 0.10 acre -feet of
storage above normal elevation for each
tributary acre.
(2) If the slopes on a basin are steeper than 10
horizontal to 1 vertical, the developer shall
fence the sedimentation basin. The fence shall
be five feet high, green vinyl-clad chain link
22 9 -27 -93
creating a nui an_ce,. i n the . neighborhood; and monitor the situation with
a report back to Council on October 11.
and shall be at the ordinary high water mark.
The developer shall landscape the sedimentation
basin site with evergreen trees.
(3) To provide room for storing sediment, the
developer shall excavate the sedimentation
basin to four feet below the normal water
level.
c) The developer shall design the utilities to serve the
property across Linwood Avenue.
d) The erosion control plans shall be consistent with the
Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and
Sediment Control handbook.
e) The streets shall be 28 feet wide from face to face of
the concrete curb and gutter with no parking on one
side.
f) The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad
elevation and contour information for each home site, as
well as the areas to be disturbed for street
construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which
minimize grading on sites that contain desirable mature
trees and steeper slopes. Deviation from this approved
grading plan may be permitted by the City Engineer,
provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is
complied with.
2) Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the
developer or contractor will:
a} Complete all public improvements and meet all City
requirements.
b) Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the
grading limits.
c) Have NSP install street lights in four locations,
primarily at street intersections. The exact location
and type of lights shall be subject to the City
Engineer's approval.
d) Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland
buffer areas. These signs shall mark the edge of the
buffer areas and shall state there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, filling or dumping of lawn waste.
e) Pay the City for the cost of no- parking, traffic - control
and street identification signs .
f) Remove any junk, debris or tires from the wetlands and
the site.
3) Approval of a tree removal and planting plan by the City
Engineer, No grading or construction may begin nor w i l l the City
give final plat approval until the City Engineer approves this
plan. This plan must show woodlots on the site. This plan must
also show the location, size and species of trees over eight
inches in diameter that the developer intends to remove or keep.
23 9 -27 -93
This plan does not need to show box elders, cottonwoods and
poplars.
This plan must also show the location, size and species
of trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. Y `t
4) Deed restrictions shall be filed on lots 1 -5. Block 1,
"prohibiting construction of any deck. or addition attached to
the dwelling, within 100 feet of the W i l l i a m s Brothers pipeline,
unless the City Council approves an exemption."
5) All present outbuildings associated with the.existing dwelling
shall be removed. The existing dwelling shall be removed or
relocated to meet setback requirements on Lot 7, Block 2, or if
this dwelling is to remain in its present location, the lots to
the north shall be adjusted so a 31 -foot rear -yard setback can
be met from the proposed north lot line.
6) Deed outlot A and Lot 1, Block 1 to the City for a parking lot
for Vista Hills Park, in l i e u of park availability charges.
7) The City awarding contracts for the Sterling Street improvement
project or the developer constructing sanitary sewer to the
existing sanitary sewer in Linwood Avenue.
8) Deed Outlot B to the City.
9) The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements
and overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include any
of this grading that is not completed before final approval in
the developer's agreement.
10) The developer shall show the street names on the plat as
follows:
a) The East -West street that intersects with Sterling
Street shall be named "Hillwood Drive."
b) The cul -de -sac street that intersects with Hillwood
Drive shall be named "Oakridge Lane."
c) The North -South street that intersects with Linwood
Avenue shall be named "Ferndale Street."
d) The cul -de -sac street that intersects with Ferndale
Street shall be named "Beth Court."
11) Give the City wetland buffer zone easements over all lots that
are next to a wetland. This easement shall prohibit mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within twenty feet of the wetland.
12) Show all wetland boundaries on the plat.
13) The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along
al 1 property 1 i nes . These easements shal l be ten feet wide al ong
the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the
side property lines.
14) Revise the plat so there is no filling in the DNR- protected
wetland, except for the Hillwood Drive cul -de -sac. The developer
shall not fill this area unless the DNR approves a permit.
24 9 -27 -93
15) Revise the plat to provide sedimentation basins as required by
the DNR. Provide an outlot for each sedimentation basin. Deed
these outlots to the City.
16) Revise the plat so there is at least 10,000 square feet above
any drainage easements or the ordinary high water mark of a
wetland.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat,
the City may waive any conditions that do.not apply to the final
plat.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption.
93 - 09 - 131
STREET WIDTH CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Engineer requested a variation from the City Code.
WHEREAS, this code variation applies to the Beth Heights development
that. is north of Linwood Avenue and east of Sterling Street.
WHEREAS, the legal description for t h i s property is:
Except that part easterly and southeasterly of the following
described lines* Beginning on the south l i n e of the SW 1/4 of the SE
1/4 at a point 310 feet west of the SE corner thereof; then north 01
degrees, 12 minutes, 27 seconds west for 525 feet, then east
parallel with the south l i n e of said 1/4 1/4 for 89.99 feet, then
north 09 degrees, 12. minutes, 30 seconds east for 133.80 feet, then
northeasterly around a curve with a radii of 60 feet for 150.06
feet, then north 45 degree, 54 minutes, 30 seconds east for 214.38
feet to the east line of said 1/4 1/4 and there terminating; the SW
1/4 -of the SE 1/4 (subject to Avenue and pipe line easement) of
Section 12, Township 28, Range 22,
WHEREAS, Section 29-52(a)(9) of the Maplewood City Code requires that
local residential streets shall be 32 feet in width, measured between faces
of curbs.
WHEREAS, the City Engineer is proposing 28- foot -wide streets with no
parking on one side.
WHEREAS, this requires a variation of four feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows:
The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and to present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council approve
the above- described variation subject to no parking on one side of the
streets and the developer paying the City for the cost of no- parking signs.
25 9 -27 -93
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
4. Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Cervais Overlook
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Juker moved to end the Preliminary Plat for Gervais
Overlook as recommended
.Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
5. Conditional Use Permit Review and Change: 2210 White Bear Avenue (GAQ
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Zappa moved to grant the Conditional Use Permit,
elminating Condition 13 of the original CUP and allowing streamers.
The CUP is to be reviewed if there is a problem with the business.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
6. Construction Agreement: Kennard Street, North of Co. Rd. C (Lukin)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Commissioner Kittridge presented the Planning Commission report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to. speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Steve Lukin, 1487 E. Cope Avenue
Gordie Martin, 2691 Gem Street
Marvin Sigmundik, 1697 E. County Road C
Bob Corbett, 1667 East County Road C
d. Mayor Bastian moved to table t h i s item for two weeks and direct staff to
provide a report on the legal nature of the abstract.
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa
7e ADA Compliance Survey
Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Zappa
Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach
a. Councilmember Juker stated she feels stuff can handle the required
survey for ADA Compliance without hiring a consultant.
b. Councilmember Juker moved to deny the request for an ADA Compliance
Surve .
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach,
Zappa
Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Carlson
26 9 -27 -93
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
NONE
Lo COUNC I L PRESENTAT IONS
1. Kayser Property
a. Co.uncilmember Rossbach stated he received a letter from Mr. Kayser
regarding development of his property.
2. Boom Boxes
a. Councilmember Rossbach commented on large boom boxes that are used in
vehicles that are extremely loud and asked whether they can be
prohibited.
b. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct, staff to research options regarding
objectionable noise.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
3. Mayor's Update
a. Mayor Bastian commented on The Partnership's Red Ribbon Week, October 24
-- 30, 1993 and the parade which will occur on Saturday, October 30.
b. Mayor Bastian stated he w i l l try to arrange having the parade in
Maplewood next year.
N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
NONE
N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
2:05 A.M.
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
27 9 -27 -93
AGENDA NO. EA I
,lotion by Council:
Endorsee
AGENDA REPORT I9odifie
Re j ecte -
- - -- _ .
TO: City Manager Dat®
FROM: Gail J. Blackstone, Human Resource Director A
RE: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
DATE: September 30, 1993
INTRODUCTION
At their meeting on September 7, the Human Relations Commission voted
to recommend the appointment of Marie Koehler to fill the existing
vacancy created by the resignation of Mike LaClair, who has moved out of
the city. Mike's term was to expire on 12/31/93.
Ms. Koehler will be at the Council meeting on October 11 to answer any
questions. I have attached a copy of her application for your review.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Ms. Koehler be appointed to fill the remainder of
the vacant term on the Human Relations Commission.
tmc
Attachment
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
NAME
ADDRESS
I ) How long have you lived in
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM
r- / [E. Cc LE D
AU G !`) J i
PHONE
CC) UJL� K cx ZIP
the City of Maplewood?
r i re travel or being n away from the community which MUM ma Kt!
2) Does your employment q 9
regular attendance at meetings difficult? Yes No
1
31 On wfi i ch Board or Commission are you interested in serving? (check)
Community g
it Des Review Board _______Park & Recreation Commission
p
Housing
& Redevelopment Authority ___Pl anning Commission
Human
Relations Commission
'Police Civil Service Commission
Q) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of
responsibilities?
.psi, o�.:
�� Vim.
ArkQ aV
Q)<
a nw �een o are a n
List otheror anizat�ons Mfr cubs in the ommun�t i hit you ave
active participant:
N a �
--- VCk -t-I ItA9
Q �
6) Y!ily %-IOU 'Id you 1 i ke to
serve on this Board or Commission? D
I I v c)-\
tin �-WLx Qjcmrnv n� ��C .�
0 c� - �ovMa,'� v�
UA +V\Q..a �rnt��,� 0.4 cam � CAVt,�rc�� b���9u �
�mm�, cam, cA�x,�, r�� � �, a�o�,
% i\t A"uk
AUD I T I OIJAL COhit•tEP�TS
O�c�� ►�.. � le �.t5 AoN 0A...
k7c�)
LA
i.�a�a���.s�J.s.
�
&-Qs xa�. vrL .6, (�cxmn�. �e�.or�s CoVYNrv��ss�ov�,,
CA
AGENDA NO. F -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: October 1, 1993
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 573 Checks # 1459 thru # 1519
Dated 9 -16 -93 thru 9 -30 -93
192,544.86 Checks # 11244 thru # 11357
Dated 10 -11 -93
$ 766 Total per attached voucher /check
register
PAYROLL
$ 213 Payroll Checks # 36746 thru # 36923
dated 9 -24 -93
$ 45, 684.20 Payroll Deduction check #36928 thru
# 36942 dated 9 -24 -93
$ 259,229.10 Total Payroll
$ 1 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
lz
Attachments
FINANCEJAPPRCLM.AGN
40
t '
VOUCHREG
CITY
OF MrtI"'I._E WOOD
PAGE 1
1'0/01/93
11w-48
VOUCHER /CHECK-::
REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 09
1.,
CHEC
V END O R
CHECK
VENDOR
ITEIt1
IT
1
CHECK
!t,
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
.;
1459
880905
09/1
T ID , R OBERT
R EFUND O VE R PMT ACCT AME- -' 307743
494.40
4 '4 . 4 0
0-5) 0 0 _ _
_ - � - -. -._
___�= „�_- -� �, _r,� �
_ _..... � �._ F �_ . - S- '- - - -_.. __._
� �� � � _. j � � - �.� � E � � _ I� I� -� ,J ,.� t _ r� � l� ..►
.._ . -. S ._. _ . - - -- _ .-. _ ..._... __ ._ ..__.. _ _ ... _
- U - � - rL -� � � � ,� A �U � �.�
... r
� i r �. �.�
;
UTILITIES AUG 93
15,87
i
1 i
... . .......
...............
I
�4 -
IT IE'= AUG . -:
..
............ .
• 7 , t (
i ' ,�
1 +, i
-
:,•
1461
320575
09/16/93
GUSTAVUS ADOLPHU S COLLEGE
TRAVEL TRAINING
_ . caCi
�2 • 00
i,, _ --
- _ _..�_� ., 1_ c _ - - -.. �' + C r •.,
Nit : �,fiA�'E . _ .. fiREAS U� ER _.._ _..__._.. __ - - --
-- �- _ I 1 r #ER^_ . �.__ - S ..__ F ... A _ „_ E .....
_. __.. 1 A c
__ .. _ 2 5 .. r --
1463
541400
09/16/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR LIC: ES PAYABLE
14 1 60 0. 2- 5
t', i
14 - «
1464
190400
09 / 1 6 /93
DEFT • OF NATURAL RESOURSES
DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE
89.00
89.00
1 u , • +t
0_- .__- ..._-
- -05,' + , 1 :-
.- _ P • O_ T -. *S' T .._._. _._- .._.- _-----
-y
14 66
9 .39 1900
09/ 17/ 9 3
U S i�E' =T M C:ATIi «i
• � COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE AUG
•-'
:
_.. _
TEL •_ AUG 'R3--
•"r . ��,
- _
TELEPHONE AUG 93
75 »
i
TELEPHONE AUG 3
:
75 , ,;5
.. ELERHONE -. _ A
_.. - �•
- 1 5.• __.. _.._ - _.__. -_._.
.... .._.. ... __... _...___
TELEPHONE AUG 3
75,8
TELEPHONE AUG • :+
_
TELEPH AUG 93
_.8
� � � .�
• • .:
_
TELEP AUG 93
57 ¢ 1 t+
TELEPHONE AUG 93
304 f 77
_
1 4 ..
TELEPHO14E AUG 9
-�, �_��
i_ • r • 2
.
ELEfi��i�E AUG
,�._
�” E ' AUG
-
TELEPHONE AUG 9:3
. 7 0
48 . 7 0
- -
TELEPHONE AUG 3
.
,+
_
- - -' T'E L E P H O N E A- U G. 9-
TELEPHONE AUG 93
F 1 , 84
_ •�
TELEPHONE AUG -�
31 r 14
-T, LEPHONE 93 _ _.
TELEPHO AUG 9 3
58.40
..
TELEPHON c .-
_ __.-
.� ..AUG .
7 . �' M��
TELEPHONE AUG ' =t_
_ _ .r�.
;,
TELEF`Hi- AUG 9 3
_
,
.11
TELEPHONE AUG -
513
31070
�
f
TELEPHONE AUG `=f3
271.24
TELEPHONE AUG 9
205.94
-
TELE PHONE . .
AUG «' .. .. ..
_ 57.
.. ...... _ ..
�1�
TELEPHONE AUG 9:=
72 • 0c,
TELEPHONE AUG
7 , :
5 . 8,
TELEPHONE A UG 93
TELEPHONE AUG . 3
5;7 • 08
TELEPHONE AUG 3
1 Ic 9
TELEPHONE _AUG - ,_,3 ... _..-
«
1 2 ,
"
'�
. i_{U
CI TY
O F M AF` L. EW O O D
PA G E 2
10/01 -
_
VOUCHER /C:HECK'RECISTER
_
M
FOR
PERIOD 09
VOUCHER
C: HEk.' -'K
VE
CHE
VENDOR
I TEI'�I
1 'fiE M
CHECK
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMClU1 \1T
TELEPHONE AUG .:.,
TELEPHONE
31 .28
'
it
AUG 93
116
5 47 0 .54
1 �11
14f.:,7
5 =i16
0 `:f / 17/'.t =�
METRO W ASTE CONTROL �C.i�MM I�,SN
S.A.C. PAYABLE 9 - '
L�LE AU . .1
t .-8 1 25 0.0 0
,
,
S .A.C . RET A I NER AUG 93
.
68•- 5�}-
F F
f- . -.r .,t}
14
11 0250
09/17/
C . W. HOULE INC.
!= `F+'rI.� `�i� "_l� } C}
5
PROJ 90-10
6,079.76
11
.1�
14 9
020870
09 /20/93
ALLIED MEDICAL ACCOUNT CONTROL
COMMISSION DUE I- OR C.:tiLL AG ENCY
6 .50
689.50
_..... 1 ._..._...
....
C 91ZO /?
F. M. F INC:.
F�R �,� ELT . 7 -45
5 6,1 4 5 .1 9
i
i
PROJECT 87-45
Z 807 r'
53 3 ,-
14*7-1
54_ 400
9 /01
. _NI "N - S TATE .... TRE U ` R E Fi __... _ ........_
- 0 T0R VEH L I FEE ,{''�y A YA B'LE.
_...1 �, r=, .7� ...
1 2 - 52 )
1472
541 4 0 0
0 9 / * 2 - 0 9 3
M I N N . STATE T
S TAT E D L I C: FEE PAYABLE
94 : q 00
942 .00
i
1473
320530
09/20/93
GU ANELLA, RON
REFUND MI SC PERMIT 4490
22.00
22 .00
14 . --
- ...___..__�.�,�_.
/5.._
ANDEuOt, BRUCE _ _ _. __._.. - .. .__
..E1, EFA1`�iE fiAY.... _ __ -
f
y.. _ .
o
_ ._.--200 . _.
1.4'75
540875
09/1-
M I N N . DE:P'T . OF PUBLIC: SAFETY
TRxVE.L TRAINING
40.00
40.00
i
1476',
54088
09/21/93
MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE
AUGUST FUEL TAX
1 r -.1 . {y0
161.00
-- -- 1
r' - �. �.__.__..__
y . / � 3 * ' __
NO - R T' - HER N STA - TEL; _P 1.ER ... _._ .. __ ._. _ ......
� � � _ . _ ___ .. _.. _
_ :31 ■3
UTILITIE Z'50
4.7
'
_
UTILITIES 98 _
� ,_,
f r
UTIL. IT IES 1 6-77
,, 6
UTILITIES 2516
7.40
_. --- --- --
-7'01 _ _
U'1 I - I 2 *
_ __ 7
UTILITIES X725
1 12. 5 9 7
UTIL IT 1 E 63
57 ■ 4
UTILITIES 63
,�,
7.18
UTILITIES 700
4Z ■57
UTILITIES 2287
f.:.f; {:� ■ SF
UTI- L_I- TI- ES'- -4.74.. _.. _.... _._._ . _.... __.
_ 2!7 .02 __ -.__ .
1 3 7 ' . 14
1478
541400
09 /2 1 /93
M I N N . S TATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS L I C.: FEES PAYABLE
678 .50
', '7' ; ,50
1479
541400
09/21/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MO VE.H LIC FEES; PAYABLE
10 383.51
10 3_ -3.51
1450. ___.
_1.52f_,5
09121/93
- COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE.. _
_ COPY _ . OF Hf�Y - EASEMENT
Z . DD �
2 � _ - _.
00
1481
0750
0. r;f� /.r=
TAYLOR FALLS BOAT CRUISE
BOAT C
218
2-'18 F
1485
710555
09 /ZZ /9 3
PENN CYCLE
SUPPLIES -- EQUlPKENT
47.77
47.77
1483
541400
0'5, Z /9 3
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE RIVERS ^-
k L T S..- FEES PAY
�
7 4 ?' ■ 'T •,.�
747.7
A
1
i
V OU C: H R E G
CITY
OF MAPLE
PAGE :;
/01 + - 1
1 : 6' 8
ilr_sUC:HER/CHECK
REGISTER
�.
.
FO
PERIOD 09
VOUCHER/
.r.
CHEC:t•-::
VE NDOR
CHECK
VEND
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK � 1
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
t'AME
DESCR IPT ION
AMO UNT
AMOUNT
1484
541400
09/22/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
16, 441.60
16,441.60 I
1485
54 -141
09 '9_ 93
MI>` NESOTA FE "DERATED
B _... _
F . C,t�
_ 5.00' , .
�
1486
541400
09/
M I N N . STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
10
10
1437
541400
09/2:3/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
:310.00
:31c .00 1
n
14 88
7�Z1
+ 91Z4 /9 3 . _ . _F , UELIC -
EMPLOYEE
PE DEDUC'TIUN F -BL .
117373.01
PERA CONTRIBUTION
14,728.60
26,101.61 �
_ - 1 4 1 - EMS E R S H I - P
14's 0
541 400
09 /24/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS LIC
` 48
948 . "25
1491
541400
09/24/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC:.
10,215,00
10,215.0 {} �
I C_ A . '' I "� 73 T - Pr
,� ._
'
F f W. T ;/24/93/ P /R
2 4,263.37
FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 9 P/R
'f 138,_.
43,035.99
1493
;1 4. 5
09/27/93
WISCONSIN DEFT. OF REVENUE
WI SWT DEPT 1993
323.07
323 i
,ot
1 4"
_.- '0912.7..1-9 -3-
M -1-NN -ETXTE.._- TR _ _. _ . _
Kn- T - r3 - R - V EH LL_C.- FE-EE--- P'AY A DLE .__.. - .
14 �.;��,� � 50 -------- _ __.. ___..
t {
14' - 424 — ' -- 5 -
r� t:
�
1495
541400
09/27/93
MINN. STATE TREASUR
STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
496.75
496.75
1 49 6
1
09/
CHURCHILL, JANIC:E
REFUND — SOCCER
25
5 '
- U N I T E D WAY--0E----THE' S . ` - - -- F AU L
__ M . I - E D _ . _ A Y . _ D . E D _ . _ _ 3RD .- . QTR - -- 1-79'3F _ . _ . -
_. 911-7-, 0 8
,r'
1
1498
1 0095- 0-
09/28/93
L=UCHMAYER , PAUL C.
REFUND OVER PMT ACCT #AMB 30708 4
191.84
191.84 ,
1.499
530350
2 8 / 3
M E L F= Y , M A R C E M.
REFUND D U F PMT AML-= A C G T # == 0 ? 6 3 ,;.:
434
4 ., 4 » r; t i
M-C6-U "T -RE ._._ rrr r t: _ .._ _ _. _ _
E T vEt� r L ..�A a n� E .
_ _ . _._ _ 5,00- 00 . _ .-
_ _ .. _. - -- 45-0, --,-0-
,
1501
450250
09/28/93
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER
TRAVEL r TRAINING
245 . 00
245 .00
.
150::
310850
�a9 /�:w: /_ =,:�
GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
TRAVEL ;L: TRAINING
45.00
45.00 ' 1
40.0_..
D>rr /Z 8 , 3
MINN - v S _TREASUR -ER — _ _
.ST AT .. E .--- - DR - I V'ERS L C: - FEES P-AYAB.LE
_ _ 68 Zr.
68 Z5-
1504
541 400
09/28/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
9
9
1505
3022 -'5 0
05
GLADSTONE FIRE: DEFT.
THIRD QUARTER F'.KYlYIEhIT
7 1
;.,
THIRD QUARTER PAYMENT
7 6 , 5 8 5 0
83,497.5
1506
2:=:0500
r;9 :2`:x, /9 3
EAST COUNTY LINE FIRE DEFT.
THIRD QUARTER PAYMENT
6
, �
THIRD QUARTER PAYMENT
6 6 1 809 .00
73,055.00
A
i
;.
VOUC:HFEG
CITY
OF MAPLEIAI
PAGE 4
10/01/93
11:48
VOUCHER /CHECK
REGISTER
'
FOR
PERIOD 09
S.
V
--
C:HEC:K
VENDO
C HECK
VEND
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
I
NUIYIBER
NUMBER
DAT E
NAME
DESCRIPTION
Ai+'1 + =1UhiT
AMOUNT
1507
7 0 11 00
09
PARK SIDE FIRE DEPT.
THIRD +; +UAR7 ER PAYMENT
4 1 847.00
;1
THIRD QUARTER PAYMENT
51,845.50
56
r ;
1508
430430
09/28/93
I• NUT ON ELECTRIC, INC.
REFUND ELECT PERMIT 93-375
15.00
15.00
150 1 .-
_ -�__ a ' 10 .........
0 /
E COUNTY LINE FIRE DEFT.........
.. SPECIALIST
F'MT IYIAT _ .TRA IIV
666,,00 _
666 00..__.
1510
541 440
09/29/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER STA:
AUGUST '93 SURTAX
4
AUSU '9n- r .r
0 3 - 8-- u03 '*
;.
1511
541400
0`-"r /29/: 3
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS LIC: FEES PAYABLE
523'
1512
541400
09/29/ 93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
M VEH LIG FEES PAYABLE
15, 937.
15, 937.61
151
BU-Y _ »tfl''
I'' I E,., - E.,i:1 fi IYIEh{T
�.t.� , rte
�.., , F.
1514
270700
09 /:=0 /'a :w
FOR YOUR SPORTS
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
35
-
:; F � .00
,
1515
670990
09
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
CRIMINAL RECORD FEE
15.00
15.00
1
•fi
P OS T - AGE BY_-.. »iNE _ _ __.
P OSTAGE -METER __ _ _
3,- 0 r 00 _
_
1517
541400
09/ 30/93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE DRIVERS L1 C: FEES PAPAL -.LE:
411.00
411 .00
!
1515
54 1400
09 /:w 0 93
MINN. STATE TREASURER
MOTOR tiEH L IC: FEES PAYABLE
18,790.Z7
1 8, 790 . Z7
1
1 ^ �_. 7 __-
. L:. t:. t:. t� '
-- - -'�' .r'I _� �_� / .� •. •
P U E L _I E E M P L O Y E E .. _ _ . _ __. - ._. _ _. _ .'. ' - '
------ - L d F E ht;J . F' BL o _ _._
:; 4 5 C
_ 345
11244
01002_ *4
10/11/92
A M ROTOT I LL I NG , INC.
WEED CUTTING
320.93
3 20 q 93
I
1 12" 45
0108530
10/11/93
ADAMS PAUL
REFUND YOUTH VOLLEYBALL
2 3 . 0 0
23 . 0 0
�
_1 Z4-6 - - - -
-- - - -0 2 - 07 9; -0 ....
_ _ 101
_ ALEXANDRIA T E C• I• N I C. A . L COLLE -
__. � �.A jf.E.L _.. F .. T R A - I #1t I N G _... _...
11_47
021210
10/11/93
AMERICAN FTIiiAICICTAL PRINTING
PRINTING - 19 BONDS
1
.i
PR INTI NG 191513.
3 . :�
23
i r
P R I N T I N G - 1 L-• O N D ,:,
1 373-85
t:. ,? 3 1 .7
t 12 4:_
c 1 _ ..
1 - - - f 9
aMEfit TGahl .. INATI O taL DANF:: _._._... _
i�E� RUGT i,'riV.. _ _ T `,._. I MI�`fi;j V .L; + = +tID __._
. , z _ .
����.. _
-
11 1249
0
1 0/11/ 9 3
AM TOOL
M A IN T L"N A N t..• E; M A TE R IA L
40
40■70
r
1 1 Z 5 0
0::; 04ZO
10/11/93
ANDERSON, EVERETT A
SEPT 93 B U I L D I N G INSPECTION
1 1 025 -00
1 1 02F , 00
:
1
03ri655
- - - -
a r •_
1 � 1 � 1 / . •,�
ANDREWS, SCOTT
A .
' t i RAVLL I -TRA
•' •.: I h! I nJ G
4 1 . ,., t
41
1/52
03110_
10/11/93
AFI~EARANCE PLUS
CAR MASHES
6,.00
CAR WASHES
1 , 00
CAR ! A t:, H E ,
18 .00
45.00
•�� wt
t I c ) t l r�
_ 4 7 _ =
t "i �; • .
1 - / 1 1 /. ^t
. + i
AR D EN ,
D i= M S. HOSPITAL
H R EVI E W .
VA C IHA1 I t +M .
' -' 1 1 2
VOUCHRE.G
C: ITY OF MAP LE1��.:OD
� PAGE
10/01/93'
11
VOUCHER/CHECK R'EC�I - TER
_
FOR PERI 09
VOUCHER/
_
CHECK
VEND
CHECK
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHEC
NUIYlBER
NUMBER
DA'rE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMO UNT
AMOUNT
11254
040915
10/11/93
AR14ALS AUTO SERVIC
REPAIR MAINT /VEHICGLE
539.13
REP Y MA INT /VEHI C:L.E
%2*04 2 1
7 4
11255
04:�:525
10/11/93
ASTM
}ti:EfV HA ZI)C Fi MEMBERSHIP
50.00
50
�....��, �;
��Y���_
-____ ..� �- . �►,� -.�__
__ �- A � - -�� ! - _�. U - ��- __..._ ._ _.__._._ _ _
_ .__- _ __ - __ ..._ E�`T__ : � 1�����Ai 1�._ .,i.�F`F- C�_IE.:, _._ __ _
�� �..�.� __ __ - -_
__ _ __ ... _.. - _. _- 35
..
1 1 � F� 7
...
C t, !-� t�
_.� �D
1 `-,+ =;
1C /! �. /. «
r, WA RE HOU SE
BA TTERY TIRE �#ARL.HCiU,�L.
S UP P LIE S r
,..,I.�FFLIE,r, VEHICLE
104.37
-,
104 .
i,
11258
t; 61913
10/11/93
BAUERS, DEBBIE
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
52.53
52
�-- __..__.-----
- - - - - 1 ��;.,.
- �.T'- �..1.- �.�. -._
- -. _ �'...•
I?E Fit�iACU --- �17t1�7.�T_�._.��_:._ ___... _ - _._
.__ -- -___.. __
- E� A7 R ----- � --- IYI�C I�tT�t-►`L�U� �"_._��i�Clni13.� . _ . __ - __-
_......_ .... �.�.�_�_�.. - -- - __-- -_..__
_- - - _ _ - --- - - - - -- I'?1 -.. ��_...----- - -; -''
11260
.. .
c�71�t�t�
1D /11�'' ?:�
�:�EUT BUY CO.
_
�UF'fiL - EQUIPMENT
_
'�t }.�7
90.47
I 1:f
0 8 0 325
5
10/11/93
BLAC:}:STONE, GAIL.
TRAVEL & TFiAIIVIfVC-i
196.23
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
_�
� =,r t
1
�f,�. -. �,
11262
080400
10/11/` 3
PLEVIMS CONCESSION SUPPLY
CO. SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
157.00
157.00 ,
0
D O H L ;1 t1 H.N _ _ _ _ _
—
� C F' T "? `' _ 'S UPPLIE S .
' - " PR S UFRL IE
3
. r 00
11264 1264
-
10 ;;FCC
10/ 1 1 / " +_,
BUILDERS SQUARE
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
77.19
,�UP`LIE •- EUIfiME�fiT
15
11265
10 1950
10111193
BYERLYS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
7,38
7.38
112 66
1
10/11
CARLSON TRACTO
REPAIR MAINT V EHICLE
69,00
,
R EPA F1 NT VEHICLE
_
1
2 ,
1 7 Fi ).Fi
,
11267
1 Z0 25
10/11/93
CELLULAR ONE
TELER'H NE
O
7 r 654
(10
PHONE COSTS
2 1.84
i
112 61 8
1;;10375
10/11/93
CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
422.21 e el
422 . t i
�__
-- - - -- -� f - 1*x
.- H�P_._.__._
C - -- AST - n_ . _ - SAD L_ATnR
__._.._._. �E� "A �`�"• - - & .. M - A S-tVT- /-VEtt7-C�E L . _._ --- ._._ -..._ __ _ _.. _ _ __.
._ _ ... 5 ._r_�� .... ...... .....
,,.
-_ _ �� ,_
j
11:7 0
152300
1 /11 /r -
COPY DUPLICATING PROD.
'
DUPLICATING CO STS
3 94
•�t� �Jy
1
11271
180110
10/11r'93
D
DENTAL CLAI
1 t� rat r {
! ,.
190 :"
1 1 7
-..1 j_. 1 ._
__ - 1 r fi r= •:
I3 i �3 L E W A T E - R E Q U I_ P M E N T
- T - A X -- - .
.ni�t I ANCE - N I AL
_
128-05
_ i 2 , 0 - -5--'
C;
11273
2 00800
10/11/93
DIR. OF PROPERTY TAXATION
D HALD R ► T
2N R'� - F' TAXES
� 7�� 8��
,,.
2fND "H PROP T AB, . FO R 2050 W BA
10 92 6 4- 2 6
) 7 44 �..,�
�D, - tlCt=
1 1 74
C-F01 13
10 9 ��
/11/:
1�� CORP.
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA ..�y� }RF ,
R'OGR'AM SUPPLIES E
t ._,.�
� +2 tl FF
'PROGRAM- tJF'F'L I E
59.90 �
.�.. -. .
11 275
c:: F 0 2 0
1
r� � BR O THE R S r,. r r
E S t.: SONS I NC.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
3-59 r 5 0
359.50
V.✓
V0UCHR'EG
CITY
OF MAPL.E.NOOD
F'A rat %
10/01193
11:48
VOUCHER/CHECK
REGISTER
i
FOR
PERIOD 09
s
i
CHECK
VENDOR
CHECK
VENDOR
ITEM
I TEM
CHECK
� f
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
. .
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
A M O U N T ,.
• r
11276 76
260400
10/11/93
FAUST, DANIEL
TRAVEL & TRAINING
2- 7 r00
r,
___... LE ALLOWANCE
1F r s'
aS'
;� S�
r
is
11277
26 -0725
10/11/93
FIRE -GUARD SPRINKLER SERVICE
FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM
3 9 565.00
3
_112TH
_ T02.5 D_ ..-. . _ . 10_
/_I11'93
LEET SERVICE CORP
REPAIR & MAINI"fifEHIC:LE
95 p55
REPAIR y (SAINT/VEHICLE
S »1r7j
REPAIR ti MAINT /VEHICLE
65.02
b
....
-- R E F` k R , f . M �i I CUT I V E H I G L E _ _. _ .. _
t.:
_ . _. _ �. Ci r ..,� �'y
F
REPAIR .v MAINT /VE.HICLE
{ }r fJ
3:11 .
1w:
_ 1 1ZT r
30 1.7.80 ..........10
1
GENERAL . REF`AIC1 -.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
1 1
1 149 .70
11280
: 02410
10/11/93
GEOTEST INSTRUMENT CORP.
SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
40.50
40 . 50
11281
310650
10
GOPHER DIS POSAL
AUG 9= RECYCLING
15
15,4:3
_.....
r..'
1. "`0200..'.
..1.0/.1.1/' 3'
GRACE DUANE _
SEPT BUILDING -- INFECTION _
1128?
C.t::0 6
10/11/ 3
GRAFIX S HOPPE
R � ,.
F►EFAIFc t� IUAINT /VEHIC�C -E
,_
0r80
340
11284
3;:0'9.--
10/11/93
GRAINGER
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
5 ;7
su
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT'
rt r 20
JIt
MAIN'rENANCE MATERIAL
I
MAI NTENANCE MATERIAL
r C; +
38.42
�.�
_ �
1 0 r1 r r 3
_ .. r
__ - DER ,� �`��i#UER_ E�
�U - -.._. __.__.. _....._.__
REPAIRS & MTC'JCE. /EQUIPMENT _.
_ IS 5 .19
_
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
4 -1 E;
11286
40950 . _
10/11/93
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL
TRAVEL 11 TRAINING.
_ 65.00
65 .00
1 1287
3 70076
1 c� 1 ct ...,
_ I /. ..
>". � rr �
HU+�HE�, .: :CAS LO
GAL FEES/ PROSECUTION
F'R_ ; +N
4
�
4
I�f
11288
380199
1 0/11/93
IC:leiA
BOOKS
If
`4.4
1 1 w a .•.
81: .. ..._ ..
_. _ /..1. 1 /
I : C� p S r
E , i U I F t CSC E N T _ OFFICE
1 1 s, . 10
119.1
r
1 .
1 1z90
•. 90102
10 11 /9S
ISD 22
PROPERTY RENTAL
313.15
15
;
PROPERTY._RECUTAL.__...... _.
7r f � ,
_
PROPERTY Rr NTAL
���,30 . �_ 0
PROPE RE
PROPERTY RENTAL
1 315 9!fl
5
it
400735
10/11/93
JNF' TELECOM INC
_
OCT OCT T
3 HO N
? TELEP �. F` U E IYC A I �"
' �;
r ._ _} , fr:
7
1 • 6
:, ■
,F
11292
10 4� i;
10/11/93
KELLER ELECTRIC: INC.
.
LAND IMPROVE INSTALL F'HNE C:ABL
52-
52.50
1
11Z93
4 50125
1
L r E . T . N .
T RAVEL sr TRAININ
488
488
_
11Z -:
470700
10 11/9
LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
" `- '�
LEGAL PUBLICATION -- M Cxl REVIEW
5 15 r
LEGAL F`LlZ.'L.I CAT 10 N - M14 REVIEW
44.90
1
V <<i U �': H F: EG
CITY
��� F t� A F' L E !�� i i� �D
� ,
PAGE 7
it
10 /01 /93
1 01 48, _.
VUUGHEFiTCHEC:
}:.. REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 09
VOUCHER/
C:HEC= }:::
VENDOR
CHECK_
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUM
N
DA
NA M E
DE
AM
AMt7U
LEGAL PUBLICATION - MIS REVIEW
77-35
1
LEGAL PUBLICATION - MW REVIEW
62. 48
.
LE P U B LI'CATIO'N' MM REVIE
r, .44
LEGAL PUBLICATION - MW REVIEW
41.01
ADS - ACCT COMM C:TR MANAGER
268.20
1
11295
480683
10/11/93
L ORENZ BUS SERVICE INC.
OUTSIDE RENTAL - EQUIPMENT
115.00
115.[)0
11 Z51 6 ...__.._..r.
. ..._....
.
M R...P. -A
TRAVEL AIMINu- _._._ _.
E L. �
� ��� �
34 _ . - _
340.00
11 97
500775
10/11/93
M.T.E I
E - OFFICE
315.65
315
11298
501 9505
10/11/93
MALL IC:H, GRETCHEN B.
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
4 . 78
i
TRAVEL & TRAININ
691.64
696.42
11299
511750
10/11/93
MAUT7 PAINT COMPANY
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
19.84
19.84
._..........
T R A V E .� , � � N.�"
�-► � 1 . �.:�
� -� i . �.:� 1
71
11::01
530500
10/11/93
MENARDS
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
23.45
i T
�,
S UPPLIES _ . EQU IP M ENT _
8.
_ .................... _........ _... ;;,
I, <�
,
MAINTENANC:E MATERIAL
102.45
134.
_ S _ . - -. _
- ... _ - -- - - - -- - -.
SEPT 93 ELECTRICAL INS PECTIONS
3175 .50
SEPT 3 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS
3,758.50-
31006.80
1
11303
53 655
10/11/93
METROPOLT ATAN AREA
PUBLISHING
19
19 ,
.
- 1 t
- 110_ . / 1
MN STATE _ BAR - ,� - SOC:I - AT ION _
. _ T-�{�VEfi.� .__ _._�_. __._ _ ...._ . -
_. _ ___... __.._
In
�
TRAVEL TRAINING
185:0€
�; ;?
7 c� , Cy t
_.
3 �:� _�
11 _.
t!►C�
_7 _ _
1 I 1 , 1 ..� /
MOBILE EMERGENCY SYSTE1^ , INC.
RER' S 1�tA TC�iT /VEHICLE,
.t
REPAIR MAINT /VEHICLE
4 00
1
17: >
,
. / / _
_G .E Lf� ■
l�tAINTEh A C`E h1AT`E I ..
.�•�
3
i
11307
5701
1 0 /11 /93
MONROE SY STEMS FOR BUSINESS
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
106 .50
1 06 . 5 -50
11=081
5705 00
10/11/93
MOTOROLA, INC
REPAIR MAINT /RADIO
976.43
976.43 ;
� '�
11 t j •;
, : -, �,rc r:-�1,r
-. -/ 1 { / 3
E fir 1'
L '• J NEST
,
11310
640500
10/11/93
NELSON, CAROL M.
TRAVEL TRAINING
'fry.
26.2
• ,
I
1 1 -' 1 1
1
5�_ 9 1 5
t_l �,
1 / 1 1/ 9 �'
f_I i_f
ROB ERT I1T G• NOBLE E
r (�. ' ,
B UILD I NG I L D I N I N �� F E C: T ! + R
1000 . i } { l
1 , {_1 {_� 0.00
`
1 1312
rarrtit��;t_x
10/11/93
i�1��RDLINCa CONS TRUCTION CO INC*
LAND
5;=; jt_lt). {,ac�
,
BETA T NAGS
5
52 9 90 . (_' 0
_ ..
, r--, {_ 800
10 1 - 1 / � >:
NORTH ST . PAUL
PAUL TY OF
_:,.._,... � -..
2' _
366.29
,
'
f
t
�'
j
!;
�
V.. L1C•Hf�EU
CITY
±�F MAPL.EWOOD
PAGE
+�
VOUCHER/
CHECK REGISTER
FOR
PERIOD 09
4
CHECK
VENDOR
CHECK
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
� l
AUG 9Z.' UTILITIES
698.62
3
�++,,
1 1314
., i - O7F - - - - --
1 / _ 1 L / _�,, ._
1�iC1RTN TAP; . CONC .... CUI�iF`A�Y __ ..._._:_..iY1A..Tr�[TEC�IAhi.�E
lyl} - AE
iwt 32 _ _
�; ,.-
32'
1 tl
11
r. r
r_
-,t
- tt
i
t
11:15
r_''�61108
10 /11/93
NORTH ;TAR WIPER & IINDU
SUPPLIES - JANITO
S U P PLIE S
t
38 .5,:: ..
: -, 2
:.:1 .5
11316
661 180
10/11/93
NORTHERN A I RGAS INC.
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
84.59
84.59
+,
I ` 1 _� ' _ 17 -
__ 1 , 1 r► 1 - - -- ..._1_
1._L_�''�.,�._..__.M�-
�RTHERN_ ATRG �- __..._.. - - - - -- _._.
_.._...�UF,�,L.rE� EQU I_PMEN T .__ -- _.. _ ------------ _
_ .__._. _107.60
SUPPLIE - EQUIPMENT
1 1 .52
124.12
1
_....__....... ._.- 11w�1._��.._..._..1�OO.....
10/1
HYDFiAULIC;ING.
MAINTEhIANt:E..MATERIAL __.
- 574 _
_ _. 57..
i
11319
670 950
10/11/93
NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC
MAPLEW IN M OTION
2
2
�,
11•_I20
7115110
, ��
10/11/9._.
P HOTO S
FHiiTOS T GO
P HOTO S
FHiiTii
r, �• ,'"t
3. ._;; 8
P'RIN'T
4 .39
7.97
11.
71154
1i1/I1/93
PHY -IO CONTROL
SUPPLIES - L.QU11PMENT
412-11
2
S E R V_ I G E ^ - -- INC-- .. _._ �.. _
TV INSPECTION OF STORM SEWER __
9 353.90
!SIJ
I
i
11323
712115 15
10/ 1 1 / 9.3
POLAR CHEVROLET GEO
REPAIR _; MA INT /VEHI C: LE
_ _
100.
1 0 0 .00
.;
11324
740765
10/11/93
PREFERRED RISK CONSULTANTS
RISK MGMT INS CONSULTING SER
170.00
170.00
�
1 1 _t t:. •_
7 ` 1 - _ _. _._..1
1 - r :.,1
R R - I tit r O l�l F Ct t1 D ; _.._. _ _
FRO - G Ri - A - M F L ES _ _. __.... _.... _.. _ _ _ __. _ _ .
61 .4 6
r 1'. 4 r 1
i
11326
741331
10/11/93
RAM SEY COUNTY
AUG 93 DATA PROCESSING
. 44
AUG `13' DATA PROCESSING
5. - 6 5
_
AUG 93 DATA PROCESSING
12Z.34
1Z8.43
�
.. x. D c� -- ...
1 -0 - 1 1 _ ./ f _.
ROAD - RESCUE -.._ _... _ - _._ . __
. _... - _S U P P L I E.S. _ . _ 'EQUIPMENT,- _. _ _ .- _
__ 4 0 n- _ s ,.�..�.__ .. _ ..
1
11328
762350
10/11
RUFF
CUTTING OF NEEDS
40 . 00
40
11329
780300
10/11/93
SST OFFICE PRODUCTS INC.
SUPPLIES - �
OFFICE
8 t� .71
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
67.41
SUP'PL - I ES - OF5 I -C-E
F15 .4'3
SUP'P'LIES - OFFICE
38.01
'
SUP'P'LIES -- OFFICE
53.95
_...... ..
_ _
SUPPLIES OFFICE _
19.34
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
tj . 6c,
'
SUPPLIES OFFICE
29.56
_
S , UPP E S (�
L I .. OFFICE IC' E
,�.
. 5 r `�F
t:
,� 1
` 3
4 55
•
'
11:_._1 =i
7�.�{
14�/11i r:�,
,ALLY DI.�TFIL�- �UI"�ih Tt�iC:.
Rh +�'�C;F�AI�I ,�UFFLIE.�
4nC}
p {}F
r
11
8 129
10/11/93
S1614S BY NORTHLAND
SUPPLIES -- EQU IPME14T
` 5v . 15
39.
�
8 0 50
1
`._, L1 KKIA ME SY STE M S
SUP - E
1 7 80
127.c'
V���UC:HRE
CI'1 - Y
� M A PL EI�f��t ���D
PAGE 9
10/01
11:48 _
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
.
FOR
PERIOD 09
V0 - E���
CHECK':.
VENDOR
CHECK
VENDOR
ITE1'�i
ITE1�1
CHECK
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
- - - - - -. -. .
AMOUNT
AIY}ilUhlT
11
8 315 0 6
10/11/93
SPECTRUM BUSINESS SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES OFFICE
85 73
8 5. 7 3
11334
'n 1550
10/11/93
SPRI NGSTED
BOND . ISSUANCE COSTS
274 . 3:3
BOND ISSUANCE CCO
S S
r f = ,,�;,�;
2 _ . 1 7
F
;_ �•f , r_ r_ 2 . t i_l
I1335
10111_1 73 -
. ST - . PA ClTY.OF _._.._.._.
A.U.Q. - '3 REF -AIR- ._v MA /RA'D - IU
�.�...,A
AUG 93 REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO
5 25
AUG 9:3 REPAIR & MAINT /RADIii
204.00
AUG �3 REPAIR & MA I SIT /EQ U I P
147 . 5
966 .0'4'
11336
840601
10/11/93
ST.PAUL PIONEER P RESS
AD FOR REC. JOBS
1:3.84
1:13.84
11337
840603
10/11/93
ST. PAUL. PLUMBING & HEATING CO
REPA `Y MA I NT /BLDG GROUNDS
302.13
302.13
• _ ._
1 0 / 1 1 /9 -
ST . F AUL RAM, -EY 'MEDICAL 'CENTER
TEST"
51 .- oo
51 .00
113 39
8
10/11/93
SUPE:RAMER IC:A
FUEL OIL
18.00
F E L t U I L
1, r_ . D D
_. __.. _. _ .. _ .
FUEL & OIL
SUP'P'LIES - EQUIPMENT
49. 09
210.
_
I 1 =
,F 1 575
-
_
10 / 1 1 /9 3
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC.
SUPPL I_FS - _ 1 -A.FF T c'_F_1 _
:�
=s' =�{ A 1 1
_:L;ci . 11
11341
-_.., C - 8 D-
- .1-01-11/913
,� 2...__.�i �
T a A - A S C H - I F ,� � . Y _. � �� � , - INC I N C
PHALT MATERIAL _
~��� ,,_,
, .....� ,
_ _ _ ..,.., -
, ,- ._ _ . 8 .
11342
81-1 100
10/11/93
T.J. AUTO PARTS
SUP'P'LIES -
78
SU'FFLI ES .. VEH I L LE
109.9
SUPPLIES - VEHICLE
21.41
20
113 4 3'
5
10/11193 -
T. ,1 . -T. r - SHIRTS
SOCCER SHIRTS _ _
_. I — $ T89 +5.5
VOLLEYBALL T- SHIRTS
199.75
1
11344
_880501
10 11/0'^
TREADWAY GRAFHICS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
11 v45
d
11345
880 750
10111193
TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIE
SUP'P'LIES - JANITORIAL
12 .89
1l2f 8 9
1134
8 82300
10/11/9:
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE
SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT
94.:=7
94 „97
1. - •»f 1 7 .
8 r_f - ~• 8 t" i l
_ +
1 0/11/513
r , : j ��
TWIN CITY TRANSPORT SF RT
TUI� _
�
.
21
T W
21.30
T W
2
� f 3 9
r !
11348
900 170
10/11/93
UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
MAINTENANCE M
50 .83
50.8
_
11349
5 j10500
10 1 1
'VASK'O RUBBISH REMOVAL
RUBBISH REMOVAL _r 93'
L C` T
�, ,� �.
'' _
RUBBISH REVIOVAL OCT 9 _
;� -�;7 . �;� :�
57'- � _
f:_ . �
-- ..
1 1 - : big
9-11'350 .
10/11/93
. VI K - I NG ELECTRIC SUPPLY
'MAINTENANCE MATER.IA.L. _ -
2
22 O 97 _
11::.,51
912100
10/11 /9:3
VIRTUE P RINTING
BUSINESS CARDS
72.48
A*"k
BUS I NE SS J .. ....
2f:._ N
' 4f 1 A 84
i t
- _ VEHICLE "ALLOWANCE - .. _. -. -7 dii 4 1.10
A li
113 551 940700 10/11/93 WEGCO SUP'P'LIES — EQUIPMENT 78.1: 8►
- - - - - -- - - -- ._ - - ........
-
11 356 941250 10/11/93 WHEELER CONSOLIDATED INC. MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 1 1 , x:65 .4 �
- _......._..._ __ 10111/93 ?EP MAN UFACTUR'ING COMPANY 'SUPPLIES -- JANI TDRI AL _ _ -.__ . FF . 54 55.-54 _.. _....
:al 1
'�li •
......._._.._ -. -----
__._._._____..___.__ ._.._..___....._.._.--- _.__._.. 1 1`�iL CHE Ca rr- --...____.____ ._._..--- - - .--.--- -._ ._ _._..._ _ ..__ -_ . ._ _ _ ..- - .-- ._..._... ._._ - - --•.- --...__. .... ..- ... __ . 7-66
.•,� � - •-
I
;a.;.
I
f
1 3.11
i
1
l:
't
1
t
It I',f
'.' V
VOU+C HREG C
CITY OF MAPLE:WiwOD P
PAGE 10
1 1 : 8 _. V
V /CHE REGISTE
FOR PERIOD 09
,j
�i V
VOUCHERI
VENDOR C
CHECK V
VENDOR I
I TE11 I
I TEM C
C HECCK �
t
NUMBER N
NUMBER D
DATE N
NAME D
DESCRIPTION A
AMOUNT A
AMOUNT
i 1
1135; 9
920 900 1
10 /11/93 W
W.L. TRAFFIC SUPPLY P
PORTABLE SICaNSTANDS — SIGNSt 9
937.20 3
3 i
i; l
i1U 1
---
-- �— —
— _ ... - -- rr. �. _
_ _ - -— • - -{ - -- r7— �— .____._ .
._. y� � _...._— _.�._.._...____._.._. —_. ..___ _ - - -.. .---...___.�.__ -
-_- _..._____. may .. ,}..._ �y�' '('p' � -•� �. . .._. _ �jp(j'� �., _ .
._.._. { _._.�
i r �• .. __...._.__
�1.5
`t
11354
X140655 1
10/11/93 W
WERMAGER, CC. +I� N IE T
TRAVEL & TRAINING 1
14.06
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0001
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE
CURREP-4T PAY PERIOD
U .
GE.OR
27
3 42n, I
16
Ze
20
S3
Cp-
E3 t ER
WILLIAM MIKISKA
19 7 US
.8
1-3 2 1-33
RICHARD HANGSLEBEN
114R'R'L'Ai� A.
.. ,. v. . s♦:. .... . ,. .. ... ... ...
... ...
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYE
GROSS E A
} i N I N G S AND PAYROLL D E D U 1...• } . .#. O P L»• 3 v i A.« C } 't i«l
7
2
-
3
4
'• «} !» �.s �:t ;' ;` s
_ ' . ,r` }. =' �-#• f` ':
�..: A # �..:# #.... '# #``# t t__ tv �...# #'`
s.::: is f p i
5
6
In
7
VX
6 w.Q ..�.r ww . ..
f .. r 'r t i t..
j i .w r. f =«.
. ... �
F . {N � � • tM+w y
L L �t I L_ L E F� = L � �
.+ -.. .
9
-
,
10
0 0 t a «t 6 7 i • E
}_} ` .' k—.» 4 9 tai
BETTY S L... #_.. V O G
i i 9 9. 8 8
•
11
13
14
�M �•..� t... Y«r f J
09 /24. "9 1 , 3
NM } iw • I • _ _
.....� «yam «sa 1
.. s... ..} !; a s...f
15
-
1 6
f J
j Y3 f 1».. A + � t � tom}
L..• �- V IN I L«. L rt L. L_ ' »D 1.... s ?
s
17
18 } «� } "t • ,y " • �„ �_}
}- •�� j l »r i j.. f ji
•t ,' ' « } •' t •t
1
20
0 0 s.3 3 l .
t �} i.... a '#` J F ' ►�3
ET
f R R,,� #
, L ic. { 7 i } t A 3 • `�i I L... #
{
21
22
i� }i�} i , f
t }`3 } 24 1` 9
C#'# HGOE
1 +� 114 iRE
23
24
(7) ..} ..� ..r i.1i ..,�
}
� «} r , �.....�
: ..
25
26
C)
09/24/93.
Sf4f4DRFI OLSON
956a 4b
27
128
} »} }, :,� �= t 4 f
t..t' :. i.'::: � i ' 3
ril A R, Y K, A `fi F A L N 1'' -.
1 o t i '� ,. } »i }��
•
29
30
} "�.� " � F,..L
2 r /13 -;i
".. NN i t -} L 't
31
. t..? �.. }..
33
_
-
34
rNr t "} �. r• t -, 1 ^ i
1. Y f 3�..: + f ' J t.�«t
JOANNE {' } s E # `•# 3.. L:.i L... N
1 � 41 twt . '. � f
35
36
}..�}.F "mot Wit.
»fir - r• �r =-
t1M
,,, .
37
1 39
41
43
44
�« } { t �" t«i
�..# .. iR 1
17
`t► }.... }' ...} t. .� .......
+� ..3 #' L ... is . �..
45
_ _
46
!..} '�'�
r te. tom?
D 0 } `4 A L D (+ t� i� K
•
47
48
i " fit - } `s 7,9
-} j j
rr wj �
«. F t .. j .«
H Y # t 7
•, j ..A t
.. 1 4
49
qb
51
«a - 9 7
53
54
r r
J Of
�55
-
57
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD C)
EMPLO YEE C3 ROc.---%S EA Rl*-,i I �--iGS AND PAY "'ROLL Dr*—_- DUC T I Or.-! CHECv:-'-.S
0 rill FOR THE CURREP,4-i- PAY PERIOD
1
49
50
51
52 0 0 G 8 24
53
54
55
56*
57
la
k.)9 24 3
C `)9/24/93
i 0 H N R A S R
DAV 1 D L j
I Mf4LL
K E V 1 N RABBE'-fT
I 1 6- -,-+. 1. 3o
4.3
� - 3 . 76
l 9
1 4 7 Zts 5
--EVEN PALMA
A +
0 B
E R T' E VORWERK
6 5. iR 4
1 717,v :SQ
BER�
-iECK i
CHECK DATED
PH'Yl=
MU N: I.
2
3
4
09/24/93
D A LE- L
5
03 6 is c) 1
9 z 2 r z
R I CHABD 0 MOE' Cl L R
7
TA MES YOUNGREN'
10 00%, L0
9 / 2 4 9 3
DAVID i
A+
12
C) Z 2 4 Z 9- 3
1-:4
WIL L 1 ER
C4
13
14 561--
2 4 9- 3
THUIM S J S C 7. A N S
25
15
16 8
0 0 L t1l 10 ts
C A BO T V vWE L C i-f L."I N
i 39, '17
17
18
19
20
R* iKA- Z. OFF
21
22
M I CHAEL RYAN
6
4 p
23
24 t
_
0 GL
09/a: 193
F`BERT
M 1 CHAEL ul LIE
of,
25
26
05t i:2.4
27.
28 0 %-316*1 B 1 2
j li I-S
IRV. I C rH A` R,*D C. DREGER
1
0 29
30
09/24 91�
G L ...
t-- u ty, I HFt-4E
I I L t3k + 4 J. 0
31
32: 0
F- kill"
`4 d-
33
34 0
)9 2 4 /-34
K V 11 -4 R HALWEG
35
36 E,
24'el, 93;
D E PiR- E L L T Sf 0 C Kl 0 tit
1 G 4 2, 10
37
031
00368 17
R K A BOWMAN::�,
:1 92R8, 94
39
40 i 6 1 6
0 9 24 r3 3
VI RG 1 Ni A DO WDLE
Z, L'4 E-1. 11
6
41
42
1— L 11-1 1 1 H I
Z
43
44 o o 3 Es. Uzi iR I.C.)
9 4 P-3
STEJ`*-!HE*N J HE 1 Pi4 Z:
Q, Z:t4
.45
1
49
50
51
52 0 0 G 8 24
53
54
55
56*
57
la
k.)9 24 3
C `)9/24/93
i 0 H N R A S R
DAV 1 D L j
I Mf4LL
K E V 1 N RABBE'-fT
I 1 6- -,-+. 1. 3o
4.3
� - 3 . 76
l 9
1 4 7 Zts 5
--EVEN PALMA
A +
0 B
E R T' E VORWERK
6 5. iR 4
1 717,v :SQ
~
�.
'
44
�
�
�
44
4
44
- CITY OF nAPLEWOOD ' 00�4
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTIOm CHECKS
SEF
Ulf 11-3
0 1
IL
r�A
0
CITY OF MAPILEWOOD
Ei'llPLOYEE GROSS EARNIE�%JGS AND PIA"V'ROLL DIEDUCTION CHECi,..S
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
•
Qu lb 8A at _z GRBAR'A G K ii Ut M M ELI )0. 46
bc
31++
1194 7, 1:
.�..4036868- 09/24/9 L I NE: S
Ab
33
34
:2 4., = tit LU'll-HER i 0 N E S 63,20
351
I E 8 7 3, k 4 Pil Af-+ G e RE -f • KLLI N }
37
38
-iERT S- AND SON� 14
7/24/93 E fi-v,
ROE"
1 25., 60
391
40 L 2 4 '923
E
:5 b c� 7 2 J %J
254, E
41
24
0 Q 3.6 6 6 A
_11 OHN CIFGREN •
D 94 R
_lUNT.
2
25
47
48 0 Q 3 FIB 7 Es
3
26
11:1 Is RQ.. R
'BEJ�l D U -JHK
L
2 181
4 10(l):36854
09/24/93
ERICK D
OSWALD
1', C'3 I, Go
I 28
IL-) I'-) �s b 8 GES
l-_-)9 2 4 9 LOIS i B R E 0-4 E R
�_ � }w
6
'J
7
8 w
09'/ 24 9 13 .
L L A M
I
C.:'CAS'S*
9
10 t-
0 13 21 9
RAVZA-i Ll D Bi- 0 t-11
L
12
ag
13
14
(J t3v 2 4 /5 3:
jo . u
CH
15
16 10 0 Its
CY-3/24/93
DEP-.JN i S L
PECK
17
18
ILLIAM
P 1 E Ei E
19
2U 0036862
09/24/93:1.
WAL • J- E- R
SSL R:
b L: L.
21
22 . ) 0 -- .- -"�
--t. t% 0 b 1:5
- .-
(y 14.,
/2' 193
T �i E R E -S A
ri LEE T Z
•
Qu lb 8A at _z GRBAR'A G K ii Ut M M ELI )0. 46
bc
31++
1194 7, 1:
.�..4036868- 09/24/9 L I NE: S
Ab
33
34
:2 4., = tit LU'll-HER i 0 N E S 63,20
351
I E 8 7 3, k 4 Pil Af-+ G e RE -f • KLLI N }
37
38
-iERT S- AND SON� 14
7/24/93 E fi-v,
ROE"
1 25., 60
391
40 L 2 4 '923
E
:5 b c� 7 2 J %J
254, E
41
24
0 Q 3.6 6 6 A
_11 OHN CIFGREN •
D 94 R
45
25
47
48 0 Q 3 FIB 7 Es
49
26
11:1 Is RQ.. R
'BEJ�l D U -JHK
L
2 181
53
..
I 28
IL-) I'-) �s b 8 GES
l-_-)9 2 4 9 LOIS i B R E 0-4 E R
�_ � }w
129
1
•
Qu lb 8A at _z GRBAR'A G K ii Ut M M ELI )0. 46
bc
31++
1194 7, 1:
.�..4036868- 09/24/9 L I NE: S
Ab
33
34
:2 4., = tit LU'll-HER i 0 N E S 63,20
351
I E 8 7 3, k 4 Pil Af-+ G e RE -f • KLLI N }
37
38
-iERT S- AND SON� 14
7/24/93 E fi-v,
ROE"
1 25., 60
391
40 L 2 4 '923
E
:5 b c� 7 2 J %J
254, E
41
Z:4 9:3
43
44. C) 0 71741
45
9-08.
47
48 0 Q 3 FIB 7 Es
49
50 a, Ell a
53
54
55:
056
k. IL 4% t-. lb IL
571
Z:4 9:3
SHANE: SWANSON:+.*
'M A R A MARUSKA
9-08.
19
F'.
Q IJ Is JANET M. GRIEW: HA
yi A
r -%
a A M E S UDCHINDELDECEEB
P-3 BURI E.
iyffLES
'4 TOERZ 1 NGER
'.3 2:' 4 C) 0
626, 7
0
'
CITY OF wuUU 0006
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND ROLL DEDUCTION CHECKiS
y Y PERIOD
1 53
33 1 49
Li
38 v
PP ALA:
SHANNON St.
40
09/24/93 TODD MILLER
38.00
09/24/93 DANIEL BARTEL
ANDREA k I E t4l � ''' � `
.
50 )9/24
r. `�^._� '-� g, 50
54 UO3
ww -
0 907� '
57
----'
9.50
47.50
47.50
w
LL
14 1%i
1 53
33 1 49
Li
38 v
PP ALA:
SHANNON St.
40
09/24/93 TODD MILLER
38.00
09/24/93 DANIEL BARTEL
ANDREA k I E t4l � ''' � `
.
50 )9/24
r. `�^._� '-� g, 50
54 UO3
ww -
0 907� '
57
----'
9.50
47.50
47.50
w
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0.-
E1011PLOYEE GfROSS EARd'%4l-f,4GS PIP,4D P-A*Y)ROLL DEDUCI-ION CHi:-:•i,•.S
FOR THE f_.-URP.ENl* PERIOD
6
• 123
24
25
• 26
03 6
271,
0 9 /d 3 DAVI D GERMAI:N
CHECK i"%! U r-11 8 E R
C3-ll(*:_--CK D-ATED..
PA r EE
•
FIRS-1f MINNESOTA (FICA)
2
•
41
3
;i'6
b U 14 b t-- U Pl-,' L .1 U L
.}. '• t . t d (
. JU
42
4 6
Lt i:) i2 4 1,9 3
T 01 B R 0 W P-.4
PIUBL C E 1*71 P1 RE T 1 Rl E 1'71 E Ps T A 0 c
5, 1 4
32 lti ?.. +mot .+ .» x:» k.»
0 9-4 uIR, 4 9 3
CON.N.1 W i MAC IER
E f
649st 61
52 2
6
J* :5
, -::,
Lf -4.,
0 14
12 . S 44
C) 3 E -, 2 ,i :j
7
.
EL E T H J I L Ali`,4 D
L I ZHb
%138 1
8 0:3 G, 9. i-C.
013 2
'4/ 93
MATTHEW NELS'
.4 7 . 5 0
il ", E R C .. A L LIFE I S U R A� N C E
C P P
9
J 2 9 3
01HPLEWOOD S T ATE P. Al"._4 r-'%
4` b I
VOID
10 J0 Albl_
I HZD 33 1 1"'41
B R 1 ' N L 0 l'rl F--' A R D 1
-.3 8' 00
•
38 t- 1 1 3 i2 VOID
00
1_4
(09/24/93
MN S T A T rEi comol 0-F Riw.. V N U E
57
12
'4 Z 2 4 9 31
ROY G_ W H rs" U
4 4 4'0
13
•
14: 0 bo
.1 a4/ f 93.
-S N
JLHti
D00L. J THUBlytH...'
t 7-3 '3
15:
16 c)
•
17
18 i St
z A+.Z
E S� -1 r-,4 A L W E G-1
19
20:. 0 i:_� 1 -3 i
Or.-4/24./iS3
ROGIE-R W F-0 E 1
-4
21
22
JUH4,/ U B E DS* 0 i-%4
• 123
24
25
• 26
03 6
271,
0 9 /d 3 DAVI D GERMAI:N
0
28 } .. E-) -Z" G ;:3 2'-)
-
')9 t 2 4 19 3
DENN S M MULVANEY
•
FIRS-1f MINNESOTA (FICA)
29
•
41
30 42 1
;i'6
b U 14 b t-- U Pl-,' L .1 U L
.}. '• t . t d (
. JU
42
31
VOID
03./ 2 4 4
PIUBL C E 1*71 P1 RE T 1 Rl E 1'71 E Ps T A 0 c
5, 1 4
32 lti ?.. +mot .+ .» x:» k.»
0 9-4 uIR, 4 9 3
CON.N.1 W i MAC IER
E f
649st 61
52 2
33
J* :5
, -::,
Lf -4.,
0 14
12 . S 44
C) 3 E -, 2 ,i :j
34
.
EL E T H J I L Ali`,4 D
L I ZHb
%138 1
35
A
54 C) 9 33
VOID
-) , --4/ 4 9
il ", E R C .. A L LIFE I S U R A� N C E
C P P
36 C) l ip VOID
L c� .4
J 2 9 3
01HPLEWOOD S T ATE P. Al"._4 r-'%
4` b I
VOID
37
I HZD 33 1 1"'41
36
- 0 9 3 4
•
38 t- 1 1 3 i2 VOID
00
1_4
(09/24/93
MN S T A T rEi comol 0-F Riw.. V N U E
57
39
0
40
0 2, E,':*.4 2 E,
VOID
0 i3 / 2.4 9 3
FIRS-1f MINNESOTA (FICA)
i_; a; 6 E, I _ - -
•
41
501 1
Q V ts ut,
42
y & COUN
c I I E I' I CIR u
y
VOID
03./ 2 4 4
PIUBL C E 1*71 P1 RE T 1 Rl E 1'71 E Ps T A 0 c
5, 1 4
143
' ..S
52 2
J* :5
, -::,
Lf -4.,
0 14
12 . S 44
C) 3 E -, 2 ,i :j
53
C Y-3/24/93
i -.45 7
R F E I I rRE M El N T TRUST -
45
A
54 C) 9 33
VOID
-) , --4/ 4 9
il ", E R C .. A L LIFE I S U R A� N C E
C P P
2
461
? i2 i
li J
VOID
') i 3l
I HZD 33 1 1"'41
0
is
VOID
2 4- P 9 % .3
C. I I Y 0
49
501 1
Q V ts ut,
d -4 5
y & COUN
c I I E I' I CIR u
y
511
52 2
VOID
J* :5
, -::,
Lf -4.,
U 1*$4 P H Li
I TED WAY OF S L AREA
12 . S 44
53
A
54 C) 9 33
VOID
-) , --4/ 4 9
il ", E R C .. A L LIFE I S U R A� N C E
C P P
2
55
36
- 0 9 3 4
09/24/93
TATE R,, % s m
M N S ETIREMENI y I t-
2 6 :1, 0
57
is
37 L O S S EA -11 IN4 A ND. D �•� � 274a 3
38
39
43
44
45
46
47
48
0 1 4y
50
51
�52
• 53
54
55
0 56
57
r�
•
CITY 0r'--- MAPLEWOOD
J....! f -i L0 i t L...t.... BROS S 1.... R+ I e S A ND i , SO DEDUC l 1M L..• 1ECKL...
cM• I:: C K Nu lBE R
CHECK: DATED P A i E
roplo rN4 �
0 2
3
4 } «J } »� L. t .� �.J L..�. 1...;
VOID
�--' .. k. �.... 1 ..r 7 # -` . R E + }- 1 IR E j� i E 1 t i ..}" A z 'S k. � t,..f ,�
.i. � f' �.�` � ,...+ f t
5
}..� }.. ^•tf �.t jM ,. -.
ate"
} » i ••, t j `• sL
j '•. 2
- t NF L
..
y,L
f. i u L.» i..w' f � L...L t
...
' f .r . , ""�
_..! . . - 'Y..t�
.»» . - ... •� � +...: ..
.. Jwi► :. . � : : .SUPER VI S OR Y - - :. i..0 'w.1'
9
10
0 } .... j " f. ...
�..• t wL L» �. L..�.L.
tr �... j , —_ , j , �.. _..
} »• � f L... 4 f w' Lw
�+��, }) f n tj MUTU ) j 2 / �•- }+ jy } i •t+ r ,, » ,� �•• J ,, • ,y ,{
s
l f l L 1 # 7 f L...• J • Lw� A L... L I �» E 1 } L 4 S , 1 ..: ..r. � Mt 8 8%
" { _( 1
t 0 8 N 0 t,�•
11
1 2 }...� ..a` �t j . �.
i!
j
F "� j . r; t j
L LL ,L . _ r L.
J
Li
-t ..a • .t «l .
t
13
r
�_ ' .r
14 � {:: "s� t j `' '} �L _
« t... .w• i L.
VOID
, •(4� ..
� _ }�...; t ».� `mot �.
r w! aMM f IF .» 4t'
�•. �~. �. •.. tilt - y ♦.: � q... ,r. ti1i - .... .
{[ # 4 {_^ s � {t^__� trj�'.�»' _.. - . }r �t -{...}{ w
.... .. 1w ill`. M» f f. �� I i I. f E "� Y ( . Lw. Lw`
ww.' .
�,t
" ^ i, t { � --
15
_ _ -
16 }�} =};� 1
VOID
}�)9/2 �`' �:i M't...�.. :.�.;tF
=1 1
L�• _ },.
017
RAM
19:
•
20 I » j 94 tai
VOID
Q9/ i»»4 I . 9 3 :
D C A
#
21
22 » }f » }Ltt:.t 94 4
VOI D
» }' 0
f` } 1...•A C CE
44. irk
23
t 5
VOID
09/
- t , ."
25
_
. ,
_ -
26 OC)36
VOID
0 ft s
#'L ... V E. t ` v #
tie r y
27 _
...__
�28
}. i F »! ~ f
VOID
9 :: 2 4 t 3i rJ
P P t:. Z:N U I H } 1 1 L- H :�
J
29
30
i - } S s , - —' .; '� f
P ' 1 !f R ED 7 1 t / L 1 �' }
L. L t
•{ J °
31
00
VOID
!� D 2 >..�
P BL 1 C �:# � � � . f � ��� ���:. # � � ��� � ��.��».
�..,�_ � , bD
33
34 » »} L..�.f t - , t `.: ; } »}
VOID
} »} `�. J L.« . t• j L�f
I t L. »' ?.... .l L.•� Ir.. i r l t \ ` }. » w • . - 1 1 J L E 7 ! I.... N " 7 - A S... S O L...
35
37 L O S S EA -11 IN4 A ND. D �•� � 274a 3
38
39
43
44
45
46
47
48
0 1 4y
50
51
�52
• 53
54
55
0 56
57
r�
AGENDA NO. " a
Action b Couhib--111,p
n ors e
AGENDA REPORTlod.. ._..
..� <, ReJ ecte .__. .
� r
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director , tel —
RE: AMBULANCE BILL - APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION
(ANNETTE A. TAVERNA)
DATE: September 20, 1993
An application for cancellation of an ambulance bill has been received from Annette
Taverna. On May 22, 1993, she was transported to St. Paul Ramsey Hospital. The
original bill was $454.40. Medicare paid $269.47, Blue Cross /Blue Shield paid
$139.49, and Ms. Taverna paid $2.44. There is a remaining balance of $43.00, and
Ms. Taverna is financially unable to make monthly payments on the balance due.
The application for cancellation and related correspondence are attached for the
Council's review.
lz
Attachments
ANMCANCM AGN
APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF
PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES
NAME OF APPLICANT: N'�`� -tl '�° l7 ��/�►�Pt'.
ADDRESS OF APPLICANT:_,1�v Al le- c'S
CITY: /I� kP STATE: 2 s
PATIENT'S NAME,
� /�✓ /� ��. / 1� . /Q ti
DATE OF SERVICE A—v c) � lyy�
AMOUNT OF CHARGES REQUESTED TO BE CANCELLED:.���•d'�
REASON FOR REQUEST -CHECK ONE:
�7/
ttj-:�
I certify that the income infor ark tion I have supplied on this application
is true and accurate. I also certify that the amount of the charges requested
to be cancelled are not covered by Medical assistance, worker's compensation, Aj4C$*"
Medicare, 09AIft
insurance or auto insurance.
Signed : f,L�
Date: lei -�
1. Financial Hardship (fill Out reverse side:
2. Other: L � - I -
ILCOME NFURMAT ION
"INCOME" means any mount received from the following sources by any Resident:
• Any Public Assistance, including but • Salaries, including. comni ssi ons, bonuses,
not limited to welfare, AFDC, SSI, and overtime pay and tips
Unemployment Compensation
• Interest and Div
• Pensions and Annuities, including PERA
and Social Security • Rental income
• Estate or Trust income • Business .Profit - -for self- employed
individuals., including Farmers
+ Gai n f ran the sal a of property or
securities Payments received from properties being
sold on Contracts for Deed
• VA Educational Grants
Li st all residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any) :
1) Income listed should include all i ncome which your household can reasonable expect to receive during the next
12 months.
2) "RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year,
or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes.
NA14E of AGE OF INCOME OF
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME
(per month) (including employer's address, if applicable)
�• d
TOTAL INCOME: i33 per month= )� der year
A A6
r
BlueCross BlueShield
of Minnesota
P.O. Box 64560 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0560
August 19, 1993
Attention: Business Office /Refunds
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Subscriber: Annette Taverna
Patient: Annette Taverna
Identification Number: 472 -18 -4669
Group Number: EP102 -ZR
Claim Number: 3189970919
Dear Sir /Madam:
This letter is to advise you that an incorrect payment of $43.00 has been made to Y ou.
Total charges of $454.40 for services provided at your facility for Annette Taverna on May 22
1993 processed and payment of $182.49 was ma y
p p y de to you on July 9, 1993, check number
0343137. However, the patient's Me scare payment was coordinated incorrectly o ri g ina ll y.
on mall .
The error was corrected resulting in an overpayment of $43.00.
Total charge:
$454.40
Medicare paid:
$269.47
Balance to BCBSM:
$139.49
BCBSM paid:
$182.49
Overpayment: $ 43.00
Please refund $43.00 to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (BCBSM) with one co of
re
this letter in the enclosed self - addressed aid env copy
prepaid elope. This amount is due and payable in
full within 15 days from the date of this letter.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have further uestions, lease call (612
27 - � p �
456 -1
6 or 1 800 -382 -2000, extension 1627.
Sincerely,
Lois Wade
Large Accounts
Routing 1 - 19
LW:QWS /36
CITY OF
MAPLE
-Awr" 'WOOD
` 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
FINANCE DEPARTMENT 612-770-4510
September 1, 1993
Annette A Taverna
1855 Furness, #112
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Ms, Taverna:
I received the attached letter from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota
stating that they overpaid your account by 543.00 and requested that I refund
that amount to them.
Please remit $43.00 balance to the City of Maplewood by October 31, 1993.
If you have any questions please contact Lois Wade at 456 -1627.
Sincerely,
Debbie Dehn
Billing Clerk
Attachment
Equal Opportwuty Employer
AGENDA ITEM F" 03
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: Final Payment —Seal Coating
DATE: September 30, 1993
Introduction
Ctlo ' b 0O
.
OM -011A
e
Allied Blacktop, Inc. has successfully completed Project 93 -11, Bituminous Seal Coating, in
accordance with the plans and specifications. The budgeted amount for seal coating and
bituminous overlay is $165,000.00
Overlay project $ 94,685.82 (previously paid)
Manhole adjusting rings 7
Seal coating $ 60,992.27
Total $162,887.39
Final payment to Allied Blacktop, Inc. in the amount of $60,992.27 is recommended.
WCC
jw
AGENDA N0, F 4W d/
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager action by Councl.1:1
FROM: City Clerk Endorse
Modifie
RE: CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION JUDGES Rejecte
DATE: October 4, 1993
Followin g is the list of Election Judges who will be working at the November 2, 1993
election. It is necessary for the Council to approve these judges by resolution.
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING ELECTION JUDGES
RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the following l i s t of
Election Judges for the.1993 General Election, Tuesday, November 2, 19930
PRECINCT NO* 1
Mary Libhardt,
Mildred Dehen
Audrey Duellman
Sylvia Brown
PRECINCT N0. 7
Chair Phyllis Erickson,
Annette LaCasse
Lorraine Rosauer
PRECINCT N0, 13
Chair Ann Fosburgh, Chair
Diane Golaski
Mary Lou Lieder
Gladys Sass
PRECINCT NO. 2
Rose Marie Manders,
Gloria Johnson
Betty Mossong
PRECINC N0, 3
Kathleen Dittel
Jean Dickson
Florence Stella
Pat Blanck
PRECINC N0, 4
Richard Wolszon,
Grace Capra
Doris Broady
Marian Jungeman
PRECINCT NO. 8
PRECINCT N0, 14
Chair Kathy Supan, Chair
Shirley Luttrell, Chair
Judy Widholm
Delores Lofgren
Gunborg Mowchan
Helen King
Jeanette Bunde
Carol Berger
PRECINCT NO. 9
PRECINCT NO. 15
Margaret Earley, Chair
Richard Lofgren, Chair
Grace Locke
Ted Haas
Elsie Anderson
William Schnel1man
Lorraine Petschel
Lydia Smail
PRECINCT NO. 10
Chair Betty Haas, Chair
Joan Cottrell
Mildred Burke
Joanne Cunnien
PRECINC N0, 5
Don Wiegert, Chair
Thelma Ling
Caroline Warner
Betty Eddy
PRECINCT N0, 6
Elsie Wiegert, Chair
Marcella Watson
Mary Agnes Fischer
Beverly Ogilvie
PRECINCT NO. 11
Lorraine Fischer, Chair
Rita Frederickson
Edith Stottelmyer
Betty Berglund
PRECINCT NO. 12
Lucille Cahanes, Chair
Delores Schipp
Phyllis Lofgren
PRECINCT NO. 16
Linda Dunn, Chair
Mervin Berger
Carolyn Eickhoff
Mildred Iverson
F 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review
LOCATION: 2305 Stillwater Road
PROJECT: Sarrack's International Wines and Spirits
DATE: October 1, 1993
INTRODUCTION
cti. -on y,, our all't
Endorse __.�...,
Modifie
Rejected
Date
The conditional use permit (CUP) at 2305 Stillwater Road is due for review. The CUP
allowed a building addition thirty feet from the west lot line. The Code required a fifty-
foot setback. This addition has the same setback as the original building.
BACKGROUND
Past Acton
October 12, 1992: The City Council approved this CUP. (See the conditions on
page 5.)
CUP Duration
Section 36-445(a) states that all CUPS shall be reviewed by the Council within one year
of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by the Council decision or
ordinance. At the one - year review, the Council may specify an indefinite term or specific
term not to exceed five years.
DISCUSSION
Sarracks has finished their addition and is meeting the permit conditions.
RECOMMENDA110N
Review this CUP again if a problem develops.
go \b- 5:sarracks.cup (25)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. October 12, 1992 Conditions of Approval
Attachment 1
Jims' Prairie
-f 61 71
Q MICKEY / ILA
IVY — AV''
_EL_KHE_ART LA
1 ~
O_.jH/NDR C J
~ 68 r-. z cr _j
- E W z W
18/s _ I L_ 1 F- rf)
z �1 2 1 1 It N o L
31 v \_ -1 41- �IQ HAWTHORNE AV
-M ARYLAND AV
1 68 E. ROSE y �N ST A
3 � U) At w GERpN
cr GERA)Avt
0
MAGNOL. AV 4
�O
� B6'4ver o
o Geranium 5
.�/ � cn � Pk
00, Lake � �+
W cr W - W
J cn rJ, o �.E PL
T Z Z
~ 0
CASE AV AR VESTER z L AV
J cr W
P
Y1LLW o t W BRAND ,y� AEL LA AV
32 32 Maplewood
co co Noture
SEVENTH ST Eo Center E VENTH ST
Y ?
Bus AV-f� s
W a
cr a g
2
W
MINNEHA m AV
5 34 34
cn MARGARET
6$ Lions
��
U)
E . E . FIFTH ST
W
25! � , �
� iZ Q
r r 1265 r 1 ��0 o J
l T „- y L FREM- W ONT AV
ix W cc
L —k 4 . Q
.25 AV SERVICE DR
C N WAY
r" - 1 1 1 1210 � �:.� !� I r ., I i! t �' rLrvi I C' 236 .. .
CZ- ` . �,' 1. 11 11 L .J 1 235 1
Q - 112_40 `t_ .� .1_ c-
1�
—_ -- `�
i 1L12/8�1� \. - 216 1 M t
—
1 ' `� r .�i1225'1 2271 1 r1
1 230 �21 1i '
L_ JI�Jj 1 1224' 1 1
t Tonners
QAJ 220
�---� 222 1 1 'Lake
Hu0s, 12
a
T. 28 N, R.22 W. y �► } 3 ( 04
4i Q
35 +36 c 0 j N 1 -
r 2 I .. RO -� 0 K N
Z CID - --
MAYER LA .rt
CA n
LOCATION MAP
2
Attachment 2
V
• a ' %43 '
- - -- - -- -
4 ::► A •�
ID e
....... .. ..a... .. •• ,• •• r o
N �
1 _ M ,
2315 r ; • ti
N 78 .
t •A •
I
SC1 776
768
• C54:] 758
L a 410 7 56
p ►ice e
• tT 7� v ,
CARDINAL OFFICE P_gK •
•
•ti .,
Op
.:�:. •: ..�_� ;_ . ; • = _ -- 2
.... SARRACK' S I
4
X.
" � I
. V s
l• / 3 j P40
� • jff t �l.1
I S i ts 19 � 1 � � = 3 24
e w
�• SPARTAN SPECIALTII
CLIFF'S BARBER ..� .�i ,_
SHOP N t o
ES
I
I I
4b I •• M oot tp
- -- --- MINNEHAHA - AV
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
Attachment 3
t
...� 278.80' 1
� �C L a w� • Tb 1eCM�►t N / N
load
,�q 6
t
N
M1i0ipD �E Y CQ '
4 \
e�•�� o tx�sT4 -
toot -
.0
7
N
t au s
( rx I r•i
if
� + �ON�TRuC.T�OM N
,•J , • ••
� W �iu sr'a • _suao�a 3
b
f LAAO M
R K R
Y
r�s n :ff. WT
(cx�sTYi)
REANEY AVENUE
SIVW4%
eaTw ts�•s�r+s (Fx�stb�
REV � o�•S p+oC��
t.ANr
SITE PLAN
4
4
N
Attachment 4
g y
5.
The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access
on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and
services including streets, police and fire protection, drainage
structures, water and sewer systems, schools.and parks.
L The use would not create excessive additional costs for public t
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. The setback would be the same as the existing building.
11. The existing landscaping would screen at least 80% of the addition
from the adjacent homes.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped
September 9 19920 The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes. ,
2. The ro osed construction must be substantially started within one
p p
year of Council approval or the permit shall become null and void.
The Council may grant up to one one -year extension of the permit.
3. The landscaping along the west lot l i n e shall remain, on review in
one year, the City Council may require a fence and /or additional
screening subject to Community Design Review Board approval.
4. Trash container enclosures shall be provided around all trash
containers and shall be 100% opaque. They shall be protected by
concrete - filled steel posts, or the equivalent, anchored in the
ground at the front corners of the structure. The enclosure shall
have a gate that is 100% opaque.
5. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
5
F- G
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review
LOCATION:
2696 Hazelwood Avenue
DATE:
October 4, 1993
INTRODUCTION
Action by C ounc 4 11.
Endorse
Modif i e
ReJec
Date
The conditional use permit for the planned unit development (PUD) at 2696 -2730
Hazelwood Avenue is due for review. This PUD is for a church, day care center and
senior citizen housing project.
BACKGROUND
August 13, 1990: The City Council approved a change to the planned unit development
at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. The change was to convert the former Health Resources
building to a church and day care center.
August 12, 1991: The City Council reviewed the CUP and decided to review this permit
again when the church had plans for their new sanctuary.
October 12, 1992: The City Council approved a change to the conditional use permit for
the PUD and approved the church construction plans. The change for the PUD was for a
revised site plan including a new sanctuary.
DISCUSSION
The church and day care center have met all the conditions of their conditional use
permit. The . Church is now building their sanctuary and making the other first phase
improvements to their site.
RECOMMENDATION
Review this permit again in one year.
go/b- 5:memo4l.mem (3)
Attachments
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Master Site Plan
• Attachmant 1
65
AYH/ T,
a
69
A ...........
V N / ...
S ..
O E T
GH
S ..
CO RD " 0 " �R.o ...: O:N:..... ............... .
� ................: ........................ Q N
cr
E gl N a
Lij
t4i oc c 0� `YD1A !
E D WA G 19
sr
N
t = ST ✓o cc
��• 19 - s
W S
BEAM X AV e-08111% W. 3 M o oa Kfs
.. R
g RaDAT=
bi LL.
Koh /man Lake 2
MAN
21
Ar
K O N � d AV W Y KO H l MAN AV . .
� " N c • H }
PA z
RD "C W 3 W 0 a 23
CO > RD I C i$
W) c~n TD� N J Z T29N,R22W
W KaNnreA 312
Cr
W Q (1) -5 W
W p N EDG E HILL RD 10 11 cc
U 2 OJT. Cr �� W �: H 4" °� aZ W ►- Q
A V ` —� 4 (I) CON NOR Pt OE MONT AV m p
p O u N B AV `. ir
•CS 3 J a J ELEvr.
t•' 0 SEXTANT y four P AV
P q XTAN T AV ASeasons
Pk
GERMS AV c
YAI � Q GERV OMW GERVAIS AV
CT
Q GRANOVIEW AV W
-IKV/Y Q
VIKING OR Y E AV
ago 33
M RREN AV ' -
L_
H CO P A K nu c kl e Heod L oke �
4- 4 0 V �- = +� COPE AV -
,9 AR N
J
L ARK AV W N A � Z
�
6. y of H
„� 4 Q• CO a R 0 9 �� Z a y
u a
LAU RIE a R Y W� a u LA AIE RD
c. a SAer- Z U W U
25 ¢ I.ElANO RD 0 SAND- HURST woodPlr2 AV Z = V Q
Z > RD B
a JUNCTION ST c '_ o ]WC CO a •' F - 25
o
Z¢ BURK a RbbinAood AV GNU
'000
0
(1) CHA148VM ST N �) E AV v ao Pk i
ELDRlOG E AY
BE a•- `th C�rhb�r
LOCATION MAP
4
N
2
Attachment 2
U 00 13 Go a-c.. VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD PONDING AREA
79 8.4' 5-9-- ( Doc. 181'13(03 1- 13 - OIL
f .9.9 V f it
. b
8 2767
4o9.2.1
2759 b 0
(20,904c)
o 3 53
C 00S ► 2747
3 10JO
re
o0 .3 2730 (71
10% 0. 0. a-
2737
o f to 6 0 ........
30 0 t o
*90**0*00.
00*0 * oo 0
0 0 * 0
to too
:%-:-:-X**o*oo*9 :oo*o9*.o:*
2731 ::009 too ........ fl-
too
.... ,
4
X.:
to ..... ...
. 0 * * .
2727
0,0o. .........
*.V. 0 o to
to 0 0 0. a
• *% Woo to
'4' to
S 1 0 ... : ........ to oo,* 0000
X .
.........
0 too
5 to to
: x 0
0
.. o
.... t o f..
. 0 * 0 0.
.*.*0*. too. 0
.................
2 (05 AD 6 ........
0 W to 0 1** 0 0 0 0.. 0 a
0.0 01, 0 0 too
o.. to
.0,
0
to .00
2707,
(U *6 too,
X
X
o .
t ::::.::: • • • .:.:.* X & o
:: :.Qk :x :::o:
M
6 00. t Y.
............................... to 0
........ to
.%
0 180
-7 Xxxxxxx** . 0 0 . o 0 *
... XX F&.
X
X.: ...............
..........
...........
.... to 0 0 0....
.... . . go..
2673- ....... 0#0 ..... to ......
o1a • 400 too
2681
�R 6 2.680 .6
'ot"00 0,
67
8 cr 0 )10 K & COO
6 2672 V ( 115
Q
(> 0 co 4
r 7.3
7
2669
N (q 2666
2.76 • %-. 0:10
1--.2661- 4 3
66 6T. 13 7 S
foot 2645 , Cr
(o} t co
W .
A rt 13 P-�
(9)
ISO 33%.26§1 5 1 .9 9 w2 11585- 1toJ ot
CO. RD. C
F 3 ✓• 5&&: -
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
R-1 = Sin Famil Residential C 3 Planned Unit Development
R-2 = Double Dwellin
F = Farm Residential EaChurch Pro
Q
3
Attachment 3
s
PROPOSED
CURB CUT •
/
PROPOSED/
_s
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
EXISTING
:�.
^ UM
CUT
1� 1
N �' :Y : � • 1
Y,bGOb� i_ . �ti • f • r �
/BMA
. ti 1. _ • �.:' • ;• _ .. . SXD PROPO r: - - : }.•f. . l7 ' :• ' •.ti -. •.tip :•:.'��1. • l: fY �f.'t ' 'Y:::: l • ...•ti.� ... .
�L .Y f: • .: ..
° :t. • � . l: 4 •:' is :• 1. � YL
yr - ._ti :•'• : t � �CQ�- • :7�: : � eA= S }�9;: 4? {': }�• }� •i`�'t �S �C�X'k�'!` ::ti ?:
.� f' fY�4 • :• -• tiv' . ;•QL��° ., _ :• Y: " � .•:ti�°� '•'} •:�,�•:1� ���y ' �n • � }:�::
' •:Y : l.: _ :•J.. . r• . ..; _ti. .1�i1♦:f�.� : li tf M 14• •ti t� � } -
WN
Ilium oil
V. Ur�vwfw
el I
�, (• .. • ~. STk'•p•.iC• ''/•.•7i • .:'~} e -M. {.1� ".•�• �y,}S'h��•y�:�:���Q1QQyy����• ' '�•;
• ' � • '' :mil Yf.1{1Q •606��:•:�?C •- • I •' %�`%G'W'.4�7860�
EXISTIN .: �ti�,�{ 'K? : ~ • ti i ::.� ; •• h ti t -Col.
�::f -f • 'ti's -. -:.. .
Ir
CURB CUT
J
{••• .f J': • �• •�, � 1Zi/ � �f: Kti �;�: :R 'N 1. �• �;•• ~1• . . �u~ 'l: �'. '`.1
S`• Y Y •�• .
P • -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SITE PLAN
4
F do I
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit to add on to a fire station is due for review. The station is
the East County Line Fire Station at 1177 North Century Avenue.. (See the maps on
pages 2-4.)
BACKGROUND
October 13, 1986: The City Council approved a conditional use permit fora 6,000-
square -foot addition to the East County Line Fire Station. The Council approved the
permit subject to two conditions. (See the attached minutes on page 5.)
October 26, 1987: The City Council approved aone -year time extension.
October 10, 1988: The City Council approved a five -year time extension.
December 10, 1990: The City Council approved a setback variance for the parking lot.
This variance was so the neighbors at 2707 Geranium Avenue could buy the property
from the fire department that their garage and fence were on.
DISCUSSION
The Fire Department is meeting all the permit conditions. We are not aware of any
problems with this site.
RECOMMENDATION
Do not review this permit unless a problem develops.
go:b- 5:memo99e.mem (25)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Properly Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. 10 -13 -86 Council minutes
MEMORANDUM
Action by Ccciltj
TO:
City Manager
Endorse
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
Modifie
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review
Rejected
LOCATION:
1177 North Century Avenue
Dat e
PROJECT:
East County Line Fire Station
r
DATE:
October 4, 1993
INTRODUCTION
The conditional use permit to add on to a fire station is due for review. The station is
the East County Line Fire Station at 1177 North Century Avenue.. (See the maps on
pages 2-4.)
BACKGROUND
October 13, 1986: The City Council approved a conditional use permit fora 6,000-
square -foot addition to the East County Line Fire Station. The Council approved the
permit subject to two conditions. (See the attached minutes on page 5.)
October 26, 1987: The City Council approved aone -year time extension.
October 10, 1988: The City Council approved a five -year time extension.
December 10, 1990: The City Council approved a setback variance for the parking lot.
This variance was so the neighbors at 2707 Geranium Avenue could buy the property
from the fire department that their garage and fence were on.
DISCUSSION
The Fire Department is meeting all the permit conditions. We are not aware of any
problems with this site.
RECOMMENDATION
Do not review this permit unless a problem develops.
go:b- 5:memo99e.mem (25)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Properly Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. 10 -13 -86 Council minutes
Attachment 1 .
biEB R A A V (2) MYRTLE CT
%
r
o ( 2) 4 ! ! f
P�
�i • BE L ANA Cr
�. - - --
OAK HILL
L
Y G• i
AffO Ent A� 1
MICKEY jLAI
IVY
ELKHEART LA
'Onm — - -_
68 ei
�3
I 1p HA THOR
E ST
31 6 �, v
n GERAN
GERA#4
000 o
J Beni MAGNOL AV
O o swnlirw �
W cc �.
t t p
� � � a z� ��p •.
CASE AV w
ESTER AV
pipp
UTI W B RA W ,y LA AV
32 32 l -J
or Alop�w�ood .
o Q' SE ENTH ST ECD CoMer E • E N . ,V
BUSH AV
i c
MINNEHAHA a AV
5
34 0 t34
�.. MARGARET
N L' ns
,. Pk
E. FIFTH ST:
� W
25% -�
LOCATION MAP
N
2
Attachment 2
f
1 f
E. M A P LAND A V E' �'`' 4 '
(7) F
o„ ( tie (9) y i - 1 • r-1 �� t o ' I
` y c G I = C3 �._. ..._..i _.._
N
3 p� 4 °� 5 6 �� °'� — 710 r
�L) 2 11 N 0 2701 9 2 1 i
t C ! 2674 268 2694 1
•� tail too Y I I { E. Ca M E F . E E T.
9 0 8 ��a -. -
�,. �. - 117 c
7 an
2701 707 0
i n Lu , - .,� " _ 2691r -1 ..� o( '% �. 12683 -14 i-
13 100 ,..�- , 1 i . 1A ,¢
7 - 1"00-43 ' � s rO � d% 9
17 O —
iZ i �•
o ' J► ��.
c 1� 19V i 9 too
4 °
` ` 20 �' •
2
14% 1 N A� ' C1 8 E.-
�, ` Ay 0,10 14 (.52)
S
'J d. 0 'C0 ���N '1ti ►2 o 2
5 3) . a�
X 57. 5 * 1L4 All
1f t�
13 f" _
92
2674 a
� t �+•�v ° , po ,
o c�
Ito ' c,
o,
,• a
0 i s 2 °1 3
91 ` o 011. OFFICE
o12 N `
129.2
o \C5 uj
(54) 3
9
rip
�2
�C W
O 2b
r (` 0
r %
.0 -
T
wo
l
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
4
N
3
Attachment 3
r�
SITE PLAN
Q
N
4
Zo-
I
z or
W
Z v,
r
0
's
\ae W
Til
E CO. LINE
- 5 W ,
FIRE STATION
W W -
�p O
•. .
. � u. ` off - • -
0
• • _.
y ..
N
43
o ?'
•''�
65.0
ID
ppp
c
Q
V
dolp
a i
�
lK
.. . ��
- -
3
111 `' • 4 N
4 or
•
_ -- L - .
4
'--
to
1D —
SITE PLAN
Q
N
4
Attachment 4
al Use Permit East Count Line Fire Station Waiver
to 1. 7:00 P.M. Condition
/P/A of Fees for-East cou Line Fire Department Buildin Project.
a, Mayor Greavu convened the meetin . g for a public hearin re the
g
40 re q uest of East County Line Fire Department for a Conditional Use Permit for
a 6000 s foot addition.
be Director of Communit Development Geoff Olson presented the Staff report,
co Mayor Greavu called for persons who wished to be he • for or a
the proposal* The followin expressed their opinions:
Mike Stroein 561 Ferndale Avenue
Resident at 2691 Geranium
Geor Rossbach, 1406 E. Co.
unty Road C
Steve Thompson, Architect
do Mayor Greavu closed the
public hearin
e, Mayor Greavu introduced the followin resolution and moved its adqption:
86 - 10 - 182
WHEREAS, the East Count Line Fire Department, Inc., initiated a
conditional use permit to add onto the fire station • at the followin
described propert
The east 234 feet of Lots 10 and 11 and except the west 100 feet
Of Lots 12 a n d 131 Block 6# Midvale Acres No. 2, Ramse Count
This propert is also known as 1177 No Centur Avenue Maplewood
WHEREAS O , the procedural histor • of this conditional use permit is
as follow
1& This conditional use permit was initiated b the East Count
Line Fire Department, Inc*, pursuant to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances,
2. This conditional use permit was reviewed b the Maplewood Plan4w
nin Commission on September 15, 1986 The Plannin Commission
recommended to the Cit Coun that ;aid permit be approved,
3. The Maplewood, Cit Council held a Public hearin on'
October
13, 1986. Notice thereof was Published • and mailed pursuant
to law- All persons present at said hearin were given an
opportunit to be heard and present written statements* The
Council also considered reports and recommendations of the Cit
Staff and Plannin Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that
,the above-,described conditional use ' be approved on the basis of
the followin findings-of-fact:
5
AD
01
1.
The use is in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and with the purpose and standards of this chapter.
2.
The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri-
mental to the public health, safety or general welfare.
3.
The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to
be compatible with the character of that zoning district.
4.
The use would not depreciate property values.
S.
The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to
present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises,
glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off,
vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or
other nuisances.
6.
The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access -
or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area proper-
..
ties. y
7.
The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as
streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks.
8.
The use would not create excessive additional requirements at
public cost for public facilities and services; and would not
be detrimental to the welfare of the City.
9.
The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and
_
scenic features into the development design.
10.
The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
I.
Adherence to the site plan, dated August 7, 1986, unless a
change is approved by the City's Community Design Review
Board.
2.
The station shall not be used as an assembly or reception
facility unless adequate off- street parking is first pro-
vided in accordance with City ordinance.
Seconded by Councilmember Wasiluk. Ayes - all.
f* Mayor Gre avu moved to waive the bu ildin
Department fees for the East Count Line Fire
Seconded by
Councilmember Wasiluk.
Ayes - all.
F-8
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review
LOCATION: East side of Highway 61, south of County Road D
PROJECT: Carnival Play Systems
DATE: October 4, 1993
INTRODUCTION
Endorse
Modifie
Rejected
]dat
A conditional use permit (CUP) to display and sell backyard play equipment is due for
review. The site is east of Highway 61 and south of County Road D.
BACKGROUND
Past Action
September 28, 1992: The City Council granted the CUP subject to the foll owing
conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan presented at the September 28, 1992 City
Council meeting. (Refer to page S.) The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes.
2. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
3. The operator shall have a telephone on the site for emergencies.
4. If there is not enough parking, the operator or property owner shall provide more
paved parking spaces.
5. The operator shall not allow parking on Highway 61.
6. The operator shall keep the weeds and tall grass cut along the front property line.
7. The operator shall provide toilet facilities for employees during business hours.
8. The permit shall sunset in five years, unless the City Council extends the permit,
.,Action by .Council
Since public water is not available to the site, the Council approved a variance from the
requirement for an in- ground lawn sprinkler.
CUP Duration
Section 36 -445 (a) states that the City Council shall review all CUPs within one year of
the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by a Council decision or
ordinance. At the one -year review, the Council may specify an indefinite term or specific
term not to exceed five years.
DISCUSSION
This project meets all of the permit conditions.
RECOMMENDATION
Review this permit again in four years when the permit sunsets.
go \b- S:carnival.cup (3)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
2
VADNAIS H EIGHTS
• y
COUNTY R D
Q ••
Attachment 1
G
•
•
•
E
4 h�DM a; •
•• °
• �. W a 7
�•, • o � �h? ms's �
BEAM '
• •'••• • • I • �• • .I'• ,.II �•ij•� '! I ': ••�• . - BEAM AVE.
•
•
qb
k oll
Q •.. w
@ 3:
50 Morwwm
N
..
Kohlmart
Gervts .t � �U°lco� v 5
W LAhs KOHLMAN AVE.
j I � Nla
COUNTY ROAD C v
CNt @ C
LLE DR �_ P o z
w DR ••••• ys s C�; W E
Cr. ac
CONNOR Cdr �.. _..1. Co NOR d
AVE AW- v DEMONT AVE T �' DEIy10 r „ 't BROOKS
AVE. BROOKS
• � AVE. p
AVE.
40 8ROtJ 5 CIT. SEX TANT z
••► 4 AVE.
• • GERVAIS AVE. GERVAIS
E�
• v GRANDViEMF AVE
.• PK a W
•� • • VIKING DR. Y
.ti
•
SHERREN AVE
Kn Lake
COPE AVE
LARK CT . A Q ti LARK t I
AKING DR. � KoIlw / •
w ti`1 Lioko ° CO. RD. LAURIE RD. LAURIE 0. F
•� V Z Perk z
LELAND RD. AVE.
AURIE CT. �i SAN URST t
JUNCTION AVE. Z -@ CO.
BURKE Cr. e ®2
BURME V o EKE AVE. ao BURKE AVE. c ® BURKE AV
A (1) CHAMBERS 5T (1) • 0
ELDRIDGE AV ELDR IDLE AVE. 3
LA. d ft* n
SELMONT cOURE BELMONT AVE. �c •
I FR GOL SKILL ja AV E SKILL MAN HARM A
_MAN AY. AVE. RIS
LOCATION MAP
Q
N
3
It
OF %J.
Attachment 2
,_ J T, •
r
co) .
/ p
N •
N
` 0
4p6
o°
100
COUNTY ROAD D fV
t i ,- j v . }
` =' -'�`" �P'T i - TD'' Sit / _ i - l.'[
s
7
q. 30ac 4.17 &4.
A ft)
t
• \5 .� 9
(Q � Aoe
lob* 5 0so
? 3. 1
N R•L..S. ♦� _ _
.. .•._ Q 7a Dos $0
TOWGR ' r PP *oX.4 h►gh renS;an pov
s'To 01L LI
rbo - - - - - , - - -- -
wu
-- --
174 .20
VENBERG TIRE 1b It'd .0g
N o,
.
S UR V
0,
!. 4 p
I.-AN o Rip
3 Ss
gE
(p
�•V$ _tS fT• l �6 F MT 1977 -
f
N 86'34'W. 14 4 3 09'
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
SITE
4
N
4
rgKf
L74J
S7•Dodo
b0 C
o'•
-- - - - - - -. - -- -
( 10)
- --
C 1
7SAAC.
t s
I
SITE
;�
1
CO
Z
BACKYARD I
I
N
1 � -- J
C
• Z
BUI S YSTEMS
I
•� • i
1 "
1
� f
- M
T
�
!
09 /
N
1
�
m
�
�Li cj.
I
1
rbo - - - - - , - - -- -
wu
-- --
174 .20
VENBERG TIRE 1b It'd .0g
N o,
.
S UR V
0,
!. 4 p
I.-AN o Rip
3 Ss
gE
(p
�•V$ _tS fT• l �6 F MT 1977 -
f
N 86'34'W. 14 4 3 09'
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
SITE
4
N
4
rgKf
ttachment 3
9 -z8 -9L
/I've k7 -
G -1
l otion � �c .
Endorse
Modified,......... TO: City Manager Re ect e
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Date
SUBJECT: Street vacation
LOCATION: Flandrau Street, north of County Road C
DATE: October 1, 1993
INTRODUCTION
The City staff is requesting that the City Council vacate the undeveloped Flandrau
Street, north of County Road C. (See the maps on pages 3 and 4.) This vacation would
eliminate an access to the property behind 1667 -1697 County Road C, which would
help to limit building on this property.
BACKGROUND
September 27, 1993: The City Council tabled a request of Steve Lukin to build one
house on the property behind 1667 -1697 County Road C.
DISCUSSION
The property owner at 1697 County Road C requested this vacation when we surveyed
the neighbors about the Eakins' request.
The only use for this right -of -way is for drainage and as a potential access for the
Lukins' property. The City has no plans to build a street on this right -of -way. The
Council should table this request until after they decide where to allow a driveway for
the Lukins. The Lukins' request will be on later in this agenda. If the Council approves a
drive for the on Kennard Street, they should vacate Flandrau Street. The City
should keep a drainage easement over the whole right -of -way.
RECOMMENDATION
Table this vacation until the Council makes a decision on the location of the Lukins'
driveway. If the Council does not approve a driveway on Kennard Street, they should
take no action on this vacation. If the Council approves a driveway on Kennard Street,
they should adopt the resolution on page 5. This resolution vacates Flandrau Street,
north of County Road C. This vacation is subject to the City keeping a drainage
easement over the entire right -of -way. The City should vacate this street because:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this right -of -way.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
4. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded rights -of -way.
REFERENCE
Surrounding Land Uses
North: Undeveloped property that the City has planned for open space and that the
City has zoned F (farm residential)
East: A house at 1697 County Road C
South: County Road C
West: A house at 1681 County Road C
State Law
State Law says the City may vacate a street if it appears in the interest of the public to
do so.
go/b- 5:memo85finem (3)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Street Vacation Resolution
2
ATTACHMENT 1
� cotxvn •:. E
COURT
KOHIMAN AVE
K AVE LA
Put
ROAD C v >
C
.• r
v Z � ,
CT, �
cc RD. '0
v OElAONT � AVE � , •�
I '?
GERrAIs AVE.
" AVE. tiBROOKS •
AVE � E- �QY� , ».
S C TA HT AVE.
o
roe#
c nrwts CEa FAM CERVAIs AVE.
CRANOVEW AVE. U5 ..
• �.
V OR CAME A
SHDt" AVE. A .
AVE, tg COPE AVE.
• . •r.
• _. r �� )A .nom '
as � _ ~
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N.
:lGh7S
000
...
.
10l . M .. .. . • ..�
• .. • • . • �1 .
, •� •. � •...�y w• �•. '
.� . . •
. • ' T ;. t
.�1• .I1� �.' • • V
..
cout
R OAD
�• O
V/
19
LY�IA
3
mom
oe
4
'� p
9 efJ�+l
AVE
BEAM
�L7 19
Y
V
P"TZ
<
f.:•
_
a qb
� cotxvn •:. E
COURT
KOHIMAN AVE
K AVE LA
Put
ROAD C v >
C
.• r
v Z � ,
CT, �
cc RD. '0
v OElAONT � AVE � , •�
I '?
GERrAIs AVE.
" AVE. tiBROOKS •
AVE � E- �QY� , ».
S C TA HT AVE.
o
roe#
c nrwts CEa FAM CERVAIs AVE.
CRANOVEW AVE. U5 ..
• �.
V OR CAME A
SHDt" AVE. A .
AVE, tg COPE AVE.
• . •r.
• _. r �� )A .nom '
as � _ ~
LOCATION MAP
3
4
N.
ATTACHMENT 2
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
PROPOSED STREET VACATIO14
4
4
ATTACHMENT 3
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development requested that the City Council
vacate Flandrau Street, from the north line of County Road C to a point 145 feet north
of County Road C.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street are in favor of this
vacation;
2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on September 20, 1993. They
recommended that the City Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on October 11, 1993. The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, after the vacation is approved, public interest in the property will accrue
to the following abutting properties:
1. 1697 County Road C, legally described as:
IN SECTION 3 TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, THE EAST 152 FEET OF THE WEST
525 FEET OF THE SOUTH 178 FEET OF THE SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJECT TO
ROADS), IN SECTION 3 TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22
2. 1681 County Road C, legally described as:
IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, THE EAST 100 FEET OF THE WEST
338 FEET OF THE SOUTH 178 FEET OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJECT TO
ROADS) IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council vacate the above -
described right -of -way for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this right -of -way.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
4. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded rights -of -way.
5
This vacation is subject to ret00g a drainage easement over the entire right -of -way.
Adopted on 1993.
Planning Commission - 2-
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Conditional Use Permit: 2610 Highway 61 (Mitsubishi) (Section 9)
Ken Roberts, Associate P. er, presented the staff report. Rick Kline was present
representing the applicant d answered questions from the Commission. There were
no comments from the publi
Commissioner. Martin moved th Planning Commissio recommend approval of the
resolution which approves a con 'clonal use permit o expand a .maintenance garage
at 2610 Highway 61. This permit based on the dings required by ordinance and
is subject to the following conditio
1. All construction shall follow the 'te plan" that the City stamped August 4, 1993.
The Director of Community Devel r;Wni may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must
Council approval or the permit
year extension of the permit. I
bstantially started within one year of
did. The Council may grant up to one one-
3. The City Council shall revie* this permit `fin one year.
Commissioner Pearson
Commissioner Rossbach r erred to the commerci ;o� \acph rry study which is under
consideration by the PI g Commission. Mr. Rsaid he is opposed to
commercial property n to residential property a suitable buffer zone. He
feels that this propos will bring more traffic onto y Road C affecting the area
to the east which is esidential.
The Commission oted as follows: Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitz�erger, Axdahl, Fischer,
Kittridge, Martin, Pearson, Sigmundik
Nays -- Rossbach
The moti on passed.
B. Kennard Street, North of County Road C (Eakins): Construction Agreement, Street
Vacation— Flandrau Street (Section 3)
Commissioner Sigmundik removed himself from participation on the Planning
Commission for this item.
Planning Commission 4o
of 9 -20 -93
Ken Robert, Associate Planner. ' staff presented the report and answered questions
from the Commission. The Conunission discussed the possible means of access to the
property from County Road C, proposed filling of portions of the wetlands, and the
possible acquisition of this property for park or open space land.
Steve Lukin, 1487 East Cope Avenue, the applicant, explained the proposal. Mr. Lukin
said he is not a developer and has no plans to become a developer. Mr. Lukin said he
is opposed to the recommended staff condition requiring him to record a deed
prohibiting any further development on this property, because it will diminish the
value of this property. Mr. Lukin said he also is opposed to giving the City a drainage
easement for the wetland and the ten feet of land beyond the wetland. He said he
finds the $7,,000 sewer cash connection charge unacceptable. Mr. Lukin said he would
like to have a reassessment of this. charge, taking into consideration the past
assessment actions of the City regarding this property.
Commissioner Kittridge asked the applicant if he would be willing to reconsider
recording a deed to prohibit further development to assure the adjacent property
owners that he does not intend to further develop this property. Mr. Lukin responded
that this deed would diminish the value of his property, but he would consider
negotiating an agreement with the City to purchase this properly.
Bob Corbett, 1667 East County Road C. asked that the City consider purchasing this
property for open space and to avoid future problems with wetlands and drainage.
Mr. Corbett asked that the Commission table this item until after the open space
referendum.
Steve Hagen, 2699 Gem Street, said he has drainage problems on his property and he
is concerned about the impact of this proposal.
Nora Meyers, 2711 Gem Street, said she has drainage problems on her property and
she is concerned with additional drainage problems.
Marvin Sigmundik, 1697 East County Road C, explained the history of the drainage
problems in this area. Mr. Sigmundik said he feels the Eakins should record a deed
that prohibits further development on the property.
Janice Hoppe, 1675 East County Road C, said she is concerned about the drainage
problems.
Steve Lakin spoke regarding the slope conditions required as part of the Watershed
permit.
Vicky Kringle, 2655 Gem Street, asked that this item be tabled until after the open
space referendum.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
Commissioner Rossbach said this proposal would allow a house to be built in the
back yard of the homes. on County Road C. Mr. Rossbach said this .house would
infringe on the neighbors because of the small size of their adjacent lots.
George Rossbach, 1406 East County Road C, spoke regarding the history of Kennard
Street,
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves an agreement to construct one house
on a lot that does not front on a paved street. The City approves this agreement
because:
1. This situation is unusual.
2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions.
3. The drive and one house would not alter the neighborhood's character.
4. The City has approved other homes on private drives.
This resolution requires that the property owners do the following before the
City issues a building permit:
1. Record agreements against the property that:
a. Hold the City harmless from any liability for the use of the right -of -way
or any delay in emergency vehicles finding the house.
b. State that the owner of the Lukin's property is responsible for
maintaining the drive.
C. State that the City may change this agreement if the City approves
another house on this driveway.
The City Attorney shall draft these agreements.
2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the
proposed house and driveway. The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control
Handbook. The driveway must be an all- weather surface that is at least
twelve feet wide. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City
Engineer and the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must
follow this plan.
3. All construction shall follow the site plan the City stamped July 14, 1993,
The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
4. Combine the three properties into one tax parcel.
5. Record a deed to the City that prohibits any additional houses on these lots.
6. Deed the 33- foot -wide strip on the east side. of 1697 County Road C to that
property owner. If the property owner will not accept the property, deed it
to the City.
7. Install a sign at County Road C and the driveway that states the property
address and that the drive is private.
8. Record a drainage easement to the City that covers the wetland and the land
that is ten feet beyond the wetland. This easement shall prohibit mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the wetland. The Lukins shall
not record this easement until the City Engineer approves it. The wetland's
boundary shall be as defined by the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed
Board.
9. Pay the City $7,000 for cash connection charges to connect the house to the
City sewer and water.
10. Have the location of the building staked by a registered land surveyor.
B. Adoption of the resolution which vacates Flandrau Street, north of County Road
C. The vacation is subject to retaining a drainage easement over the entire right-
of -way.
Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Axdahl,
Fischer, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach
Nays-- Kittridge
The motion passed.
Mr. Sigmundik resumed his position on the Commission.
VI. VISITOR PRIES TATIONS
There were 0 '
it presentations.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Maplewood City Council invites you to a public hearing. This hearing concerns the
City's proposal to vacate Flandrau Street, north of County Road C. The vacation is
subject to retaining a drainage easement over the entire right -of -way. The Council will
hold this hearing on Monday, October 11, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council
Chambers (1830 East County Road B).
Call Geoff Olson at 770 -4562 for more information.
Sign language interpreters are available. You must request this service at least 96 hours
in advance. Call 770 -4524 to make arrangements.
PUBLISH: September 29, 1993.
x =W /
MEMORANDUM .Action by Council'i
Endorse
TO: City Manager Modifie
FROM: Director of Community Development Rejecte
SUBJECT: Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility Date
DATE: October 1, 1993
On September 27, 1993, the City Council tabled this project until October 11. The
Council asked the Volunteers of America (VOA) if they would buy the entire City
property at the corner of Van Dyke Street and Cope Avenue and the adjacent property
to the east. Since the Council meeting, the VOA Board voted to abandon this project
because of increasing costs. As a result, the VOA has withdrawn all of their applications.
Therefore, the Council should take not action on the requests. I asked the VOA
representative to attend the Council meeting in case there are questions.
go/b- S:VOA.mem (11)
Attachment: October 1 Staff Report
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility
LOCATION: White Bear and Cope Avenues
DATE: October 1, 1993
iNrROnucnoN
Request
VOA is requesting that the City do the following:
1. Vacate the undeveloped alley between Castle Avenue and the vacated Hazel Street.
(See the map on page 21.)
2. Vacate Cope Avenue between Castle Avenue and Hazel Street. (See the map on
page 21.)
3. Change the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
(See the maps on pages 20 and 21 and VOA's letter on page 26.)
4. Sell part of the City -owned lot on the comer of Cope Avenue and Van Dyke Street
to VOA. (See the map on page 22.) The VOA wants to buy the north 20 feet of the
City's lot to the south and an adjacent thirty feet of the vacated Cope Avenue for a
total of 50 feet.
S. Approve a variance to the City's density standards. (See their letter on page 27.)
6. Approve fewer parking spaces and garages than the Code requires. The Code
requires that VOA provide 132 parking spaces —two for each living unit. Sixty -six of
these spaces must be in garages. VOA is proposing 44 open parking spaces and no
garages.
7. Plans for a new assisted care living building, a dining room addition to the existing
building and changes to the Maplewood Care Center site.
8. Approve up to $12 million in tom- exempt housing revenue bonds.
Project Description
VOA Care Centers of Minnesota (VOA) is proposing to build a 66 -unit assisted care
living facility. This facility would be on a 3.1 -acre site that is north of the Cope Avenue
right -of -way and east of White Bear Avenue. The building would be three stories high.
There would be 10 alcove (studio) units, 50 one - bedroom units and 6two- bedroom
units. The siding would be vinyl with brick accents. (See the attached plans.) The
basement would have 11,000 square feet for a storm shelter. There would be a tunnel
connecting the new with the existing building. VOA also plans to build an eight -foot-
wide trail along their south property line. (See the maps on pages 18 and 20 and the
site plan on page 23.)
The care available at this facility would be between that at a nursing home and that
available at housing for independent seniors. The assisted care living facility would
pr ovide m 0 n 0 m al
p aid for daily g livin to the residents. This would include help with
housekeeping, laundry, bathing, mobility, medication management, social events,
nutritional or other needs.
VOA is proposing the following changes to the existing Maplewood Care Center site:
(VOA owns the Maplewood Care Center.)
1. Move the trash enclosure from the west to the east side of the parking lot. The
enclosure is now where the proposed service drive would connect to the proposed
building.
2. Add eleven new spaces to the southerly parking lot's south side.
3. Replace the wooden fence along the east lot line with a solid, eight- foot -tall
wooden screening- fence. (This was a neighbor's request.)
4. Build screening fencing around two existing storage sheds. These sheds are on the
south parking lot, south of the proposed trash enclosure. This fencing would match
the proposed fence for the east lot line. VOA did not show these on the site plan.
5. Remove the wooden fence along the north side of Cope Avenue and landscape this
area. (This was a neighbor's request.)
6. Install stop signs at the frontage road. One would at the main northerly entrance.
The second would be at the new main entrance to the proposed building. (This was
a neighbor's request.)
7. Build a one -story dining room addition onto the building's south side. VOA did not
provide exterior elevations.
8. Revise the Sherren Avenue driveway and parking. There are 27 existing parking
spaces along the south side of this drive. VOA proposes to add more asphalt and
restripe this drive for 15 parking spaces. There would be nine parking spaces on
2
the north side and six on the south side of this driveway. VOA also plans to narrow
the drive entrance from 33 feet to 24 feet.
9. Add ten parking spaces to the north parking lot's east end. (Note: There is an
error on the plans. They show curbed islands in the north parking lot. These are
not existing or proposed.)
BACKGROUND
January 20, 1972: The City Council denied the alley vacation. They intended to review
the alley vacation again after the City resolved the question of extending Cope Avenue.
(At the time, the Council was considering whether to build Cope Avenue to White Bear
Avenue.)
July 11, 1983: The City Council changed the land use plan to delete Cope Avenue as a
collector street from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street.
August 28, 1989: The Council gave preliminary approval to VOA's request for
$5.,300.,000 in tax - exempt financing to buy the Maplewood Care Center. This approval
was subject to VOA making the following im
J provements to the building and site:
1. The remainder of the building must be sprinklered to meet the building code
over a two -year period.
2. Thirteen additional parking spaces shall be added, subject to the approval of the
CDRB. Concrete curbing shall be provided around the new parking spaces and
the two existing lots.
3. The trash enclosure shall be screened to meet the City Code.
4. Staff to review the address as 1905 Cope Avenue.
The VOA completed these improvements.
September 25, 1989: The Council vacated Sherren Avenue between White Bear Avenue
and the vacated Hazel Street.
December 10, 1990: The Council considered changing the land use plan for the
undeveloped property at the corner of Cope Avenue and Castle Avenue. The change was
from R -3H (high - density residential) to R -1 (low- density residential). The Council
decided not to make this change. The Council gave no reason. The Planning
Commission recommended against a change because noise from White Bear Avenue was
not conducive for single dwellings and the VOA was planning a senior project on this
3
site. The Council did change the zoning on the Sherren Avenue right -of -way from R -1
to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
DISCUSSION
Alley Vacation
There is no need for the undeveloped alley on this site. VOA owns the property on both
sides of the alley. The alley vacation would allow them to build the proposed care
facility as shown on the site plan. The City should keep an easement over part of the
east end of the alley for existing underground utilities.
Cope Avenue Vacation
The Cope Avenue right -of -way between Hazel Street and Van Dyke Street has utilities,
but the City has not paved it. VOA is requesting the vacation because. they feel it would:
1. Prevent through traffic and further congestion to the neighborhood to the east.
2. Prevent traffic congestion at the intersection of Cope Avenue and Van Dyke Street.
3. Allow the City to sell their property to the southwest or use it for a small park.
4. Give VOA more land to build more units.
We received a mixed reaction from the neighbors about vacating Cope Avenue. Of the
neighbors we surveyed, two said they wanted Cope Avenue vacated and two wanted the
street put through. The owners of the undeveloped lot that is west of 2271 Hazel
Avenue object to the vacation. They object because it would land -lock their property.
(See their letter on page 30.) In 1988, the City held a public hearing to put Cope
Avenue through. The hearing notices went to a larger area than our recent survey. Most
of the neighbors then opposed the street. The neighbors thought that putting Cope
Avenue through would increase traffic through their neighborhood.
There are three options for Cope Avenue: (I put them in order of preference.)
1. Vacate all the right -of -way, except the south half of the right -of -way next to 2271
Hazel Street. The south half of the vacated right -of -way would become part of the
two lots to the south. The north half would go to the VOA site. The remaining 30-
foot -wide right -of -way would maintain access for the lot that is west of 2271 Hazel
Street. (I have shown this option on page 18.) The City Council would have to
approve a private driveway to this lot, since it would not front on a public street.
The City Code does not allow us to issue a building permit on a lot that does not
4
front on an improved public street. This option would end the option of building
this section of Cope Avenue.
2. Vacate all of Cope Avenue between `Tan Dyke and Hazel Streets. Make the vacation
subject to VOA giving a driveway easement to the owners of the lot that is west of
2271 Hazel Street. This option also would end the option of building this section of
Cope Avenue.
3. Take no action. This option would allow for a future street. There are some
residents who want this street built. This option would reduce the VOA site by 0.18
acres. This would lower the maximum allowed density of the project by four one-
bedroom units. VOA would have to buy more land from the City or drop four units.
4. Deny the vacation and build a street now. A 1988 study by the City Engineer
showed that building this part of Cope Avenue was feasible. The City could
probably not sustain assessments to all the adjacent properties. The only property
that would receive direct benefit from a street is the lot behind 2271 Hazel Street.
If the Council chooses this option, they should order a new feasibility study.
With Options One and Two above, the City should keep an easement for the existing
utilities.
Zoning Map Change
Rezoning the VOA site to R -3 would be consistent with the Cites R -3(H) (residential
high density) land use plan designation (page 19). It also would be consistent with the
proposed assisted care living facility.
Land Purchase or Density Variance
VOA's project would exceed the City's density standards for senior housing. They
would have 78 residents, based on the proposed mix of housing units and the City's
density standards. The proposed mix includes 10 studio units (11 people), 50 one-
bedroom units (55 people) and 6two - bedroom units (12 people). The Comprehensive
Plan limits the 3.11 -acre site to a maximum of 71 people.
VOA has three options. They could reduce the number of units, buy additional land or
the City could approve a variance to the density standards. The VOA told us that their
preference is to buy additional land for their site. This would avoid having the City
setting a precedent for other senior housing projects.
5
Land Purchase
The City originally bought the lot on the southeast corner of Cope Avenue and Van
Dyke Street for additional sweet right -of -way. (See the intersection plan on page 25.)
The City would need this right -of -way if the City were to rebuild the Cope Avenue/Van
Dyke Street/Castle Avenue intersection. The City would not need the this property if
the City vacates Cope Avenue between Van Dyke and Hazel Streets. The City would
keep the south 114.32 feet. The City could sell the remaining property for a single
dwelling.
If the VOA would add 0.3 acres of property to their site, the project's 66 units would
meet the City's density standards. VOA could buy the undeveloped lot that is west of
2271 Hazel Street or a 50- foot -wide piece of the City -owned lot at the corner of Van
Dyke Street and Cope Avenue. On July 19, 1993, the Parks Commission reviewed the
idea of developing the City's lot into a park. The Parks Commission recommended that
the City sell the lot to VOA. (See their minutes on page 49.) Having VOA buy this site
would be consistent with some of the neighbors' requests for open space at this corner.
An appraiser estimated the value of a 50- foot -wide piece of this lot at $14,865. If the
City vacates Cope Avenue and sells this fifty-foot strip to the VOA, it would leave a
114 - foot -wide lot for a single dwelling. This size lot would fit the character of the
neighborhood. The other lots on the east side of Van Dyke Street are 82 to 134 feet
wide.
Density Variance
If the VOA cannot buy additional land, they are requesting that the City approve a
density variance. This would allow them to build all 66 units. They give several reasons
in their letter on page 23 for their request. These include not having density standards
specifically for assisted living facilities (the City has one set of density standards for all
senior housing), and that the one - bedroom units always have one resident. (The City's
density standards for senior housing use 1.1 person per unit.) VOA also states that the
typical resident in the project would have less impact on City services than those in
other types of senior housing.
Parking Authorization
The City has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior
housing. (See the parking for other senior projects on page 14.) The new VOA building
would have less parking per unit than the other senior projects in the City, but would
be similar to Concordia Arms. Some of the projects that have more parking per unit are
for younger seniors that may have vehicles. Most of the residents at the VOA project
will not drive. Parking is primarily for visitors and staff. The proposed number of spaces
should be enough. If a problem develops, VOA can add more parking.
Site Design
Trail
VOA is proposing awood -chip trail along the Cope Avenue right -of -way. (See the
attached site plan.) A trail would allow pedestrian and bicycle access between the
commercial area and the residential neighborhood. The developer should pave this trail
with asphalt for durability, better appearance, easier maintenance (snow plowing and
sweeping) and greater use (bicycles, pedestrians, wheel chairs, etc).
Trees/LandscaPiug
The Code requires that VOA replace up to 31 of the large trees (ten trees per acre) on
the site. The proposed landscape plan exceeds this. (See the attached plan and the
reduced plan on page 24.) VOA should increase the size of the proposed shade trees to
2 -1/2 inches in diameter as the Code requires.
Maplewood Care Center Addition
Before the City can issue a building permit for the Maplewood Care Center addition,
VOA will have to submit building elevations to the Community Design Review Board.
Stop Signs on the Frontage Road
The neighbors along the frontage road requested stop signs on the frontage road to
slow traffic. The City Engineer does not recommend these signs. They would hinder the
traffic flow. Stop signs are considered by the Council once each year.
Parking Lot Setback
The Code requires that parking spaces be no closer than fifteen feet to dwelling
windows. The parking spaces on the building's north side abut a covered porch (no
windows or screening). The architect told me that these spaces would be three feet
from the porch and fifteen feet from the dwelling unit windows. The intent of the Code
is to provide at least fifteen feet of yard between a parking lot and a dwelling. While
this proposal meets the letter of the ordinance, it does not meet the intent. There is
room to move the building to the south and increase the setback to the parking lot. A
fifteen -foot yard between the porch and parking lot would improve the building's
appearance from the Sherren Avenue driveway and make a more pleasant use of the
porch for the seniors.
7
Tax - exempt Financing
Tax - exempt financing reduces the interest rate for the developer's financing. The City is
not liable for this financing. There is no loss of money to the City. This money normally
would have gone to the Federal treasury. Tax - exempt financing is for the expansion or
new construction of businesses that would provide a needed service, create new jobs or
provide additional tax revenue. This project would provide a service for the area and
create about 30 new full- and part -time jobs. There also would be a public benefit since
the City would receive an administrative fee at the bond closing. The City has approved
tax - exempt financing for at least eight other housing projects in recent years, including
the adjacent VOA Care Centex (See the list of projects on page 15.)
The City has special design requirements for projects using tax - exempt bonds. A project
using tax - exempt financing must include three mandatory design requirements and at
least 8 of 21 optional design requirements. The VOA project meets all three of the
mandatory design requirements and at least 10 of the 21 optional design requirements.
The City does not have to approve the tax - exempt financing. As such, the City can
negotiate conditions of approval. The City should require the developer to buy
additional property as part of the tax - exempt financing approval. This is so the
development would not need a variance from the City's density standards.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A: Approve the resolution on page 32. This resolution vacates the undeveloped alley
north of Cope Avenue, between White Bear Avenue and the Maplewood Care
Center. This vacation is subject to the City keeping a drainage and utility easement
over the south 10 feet of the east 30 feet. The City should vacate this alley because
it is in the public interest. It is in the public interest because:
1. There is no need for this alley.
2. The City does not build alleys.
3. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded alleys.
B. Adopt the resolution on page 33. This resolution vacates part of the Cope Avenue
right -of -way between Castle Avenue and Hazel Streets. This vacation is subject to
the City keeping kee in a public utility and trail easement over the right -of -way. The City
should vacate this street because it is in the public interest. It is in the public
interest because:
1. There is no need for this right -of -way.
2. The adjacent properties have adequate street access.
3. The vacation will prevent through traffic from going through the neighborhood
to the east.
8
C. Approve the resolution on page 35. This resolution changes the zoning of this
property from R -1 (single- dwelling residential) to R -3 (multiple - family residential).
The City bases this rezoning on the findings required by the City Code and that the
R -3 zoning is consistent with the City's land use plan.
D. Approve the sale of the north fifty feet (with Cope Avenue vacated) of the
undeveloped lot on the southeast corner of Cope Avenue and Van Dyke Street for
$14,865. The City declares this land as excess property because:
1. The City obtained this lot to build Cope Avenue.
2. The City does not now need this property for a street.
3. It is not in the public interest to construct Cope Avenue.
E. Take no action on the density variance request.
A pp rove 92 fewer spaces than Code requires and no garages, si
F. nce:
parking g p
1. Most of the residents would not drive.
2. The City has allowed fewer parking spaces for similar seniors housing
developments.
The property owner shall add off - street parking if the City determines there is not
enough parking.
G. Approve the site plan and design standards notes (stamped August 12, 1993), the
building elevations (stamped June 30, 1993) and the landscape plan (stamped
August 20, 1993) for the Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility and the changes
to the Maplewood Care Center site. The City approves these plans subject to the
following conditions:
1. This review must be repeated in two years if the City has not issued a
building permit for this project.
2. All construction shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes in the plans. The Community Design
Review Board must approve major changes.
3. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
4. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
5. Install a g s handicap-parking �
arkin i for each handicap - parking space. Handicap -
parking stalls and signs must follow ADA requirements.
0
6. Submit plans for the fence along the east lot line, the trash - enclosure and the
shed- enclosure fencing to the staff. The City will not issue a building permit
until the staff approves these plans.
7. Increase the size of the deciduous shade trees to 2 -1/2 r inch balled and
burlapped (Code requirement).
8. Revise the grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to reflect the new
parking lot design. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the
Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook. The
utility plan shall show any fire hydrants required by the City Fire Marshal. The
City shall not issue a building permit until the City Engineer approves this
plan.
9. Revise the site plan to:
a. Remove the curb islands in the northerly parking lot if they are not to be
built.
b. widen the drive aisle that serves the seven diagonal parking stalls west of
the proposed building's main entrance to 22.6 feet. (Code requirement)
C. Provide at least a fifteen -foot setback between the parking spaces on the
south side of the Sherren Avenue drive and the porch. If Cope Avenue is
not vacated, the building shall be moved south to meet the 30 -foot
rnirrr� setback from Cope Avenue.
d. Replace the wood -chip trail with an eight- foot -wide paved trail.
e. Move the dumpster to the west side of the southerly parking lot. Place the
dumpster so it does not block or take up a parking space.
f. Drop the stop signs proposed on the frontage road.
10. Before the City issues a building permit for the Maplewood Care Center
addition, the Board must approve the building elevations.
11. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City, for any
required work that is not completed by occupancy. The amount shall be 150%
of the cost of the unfinished work. VOA shall give the staff an agreement that
will allow the City to complete any unfinished work.
H. Adopt the resolution on page 36 and the Housing Finance Program on page 45.
This resolution approves tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing for up to $12
10
million to construct the Volunteers of America assisted living facility. Approval is
subject to the following conditions:
1. Meeting the City's requirements for tax - exempt mortgage revenue note
financing.
2. The VOA buying enough additional property to meet the City s density
standards.
11
CITIZEN COMMENTS
We asked the surroundin g property owners for their opinion of these requests. The staff
sent surveys to the property owners within 350 feet of the site. Out of 31 properties,
we received 14 replies. Seven were for the proposals, five were against and two had no
comment.
Those for the requests had the following comments:
1. It vacates Cope Avenue. Putting the street through would not be in the best
interest of the neighborhood. Also want to know how the lot behind will have
access -from Hazel or Van Dyke? They mentioned using the City property on Van
Dyke and Cope for a park. Is this in the planning? Nice idea for a small green space
set in kind of a park. I object to any idea of having access to the parking lot on the
south end of the nursing home from Cope Avenue. At the time the nursing home
was built, it was stated that the home would have no access this way. We do not
want delivery trucks using the neighborhood streets, nor any other traffic to or
from the home or the new building using it. They should change the south parking
lot of the home to green space and have all parking on the north end. Move the
dumpster out of the south lot also. Make all deliveries from the north side.
(Niezgocki - 2271 Hazel Street)
2. I do not want the traffic Cope Avenue would bring to our street if it were to go
through. (Garry - 2261 Hazel Street)
3. It would be a good buffer zone for Highway 36. (Lockery - 2256 Hazel Street)
4. I would like to see Cope Avenue extended to White Bear Avenue. (Lindgren - 2250
Hazel Street)
5. The assisted living facility would be the most desirable use of the property.
(Anderson - 2249 Craig Place)
Those against the requests had the following comments:
1. When oh when, is the nursing home going to quit making us a "buffer "? We are
not gp er se - a amst senior housing against being squeezed out and a lower value of
g g
home - we have realtors roof ! The frontage road - cannot hold more traffic - or
p
for that matter more noise - (from trucks, etc.). Their wood fence is not a noise
barrier!! Right now we have a vacant HUD home at 1922 Castle - another to the
east of us is oin soon! Why not have them take the three of us - and put in a
g g
courtyard and - and underground tunnel to connect them ?? makes more sense! We will
gr
protest loud and clear. (Themmes - 1928 Castle Avenue)
12
2. Added traffic on Hazel Street North. (Chiconis - 2264 Hazel Street)
3. We still would like to see single- dwelling homes in this area. If that is impossible,
we cannot comment on any plans that the VOA might have without seeing what
they have in mind. Besides, they really haven't been very good neighbors in that
they have not taken very good care of their property and fence along Cope Avenue
and our property line to the point of it being an eyesore in our neighborhood.
What's to stop them from bringing down our neighborhood even more? (Gehrke -
1917 Cope Avenue)
4. I want Cope Avenue to go through to White Bear Avenue. (Bambach - 2256 Craig
Place)
S. See the letter on page 30.
13
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Area: 3.11 acres
Existing land use: Undeveloped
Property Owner: Volunteers of America Care Facilities and Care Centers, Minnesota
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Existing parking lots for Maplewood Care Center
East: Maplewood Care Center and houses on Cope and Castle Avenues. The
Maplewood Care Center is a three -story 156 -bed nursing home.
South: Cope Avenue right -of -way. South of the right -of -way is asingle- family home,
an undeveloped lot (privately owned) and City -owned lot on the corner of
Cope Avenue and Van Dyke Street.
West: Castle Avenue (frontage road) and White Bear Avenue
PLANNING
Proposed Density: 21.2 units per acre.
Section 412.851 of State Statutes states that no vacation shall be made unless it appears
in the interest of the public to do so.
Land Use Plan designation: R -3H (multiple dwelling)
Zoning: R -1 (single dwelling)
The City has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior
housing. These projects include:
1. Concordia Arms: 100 spaces for 124 units or .8 space per unit.
2. Hazel Ridge: 75 spaces for 75 units or 1 space per unit.
3. Casey Lake (Harmony School site —never built): 62 spaces for 62 units or 1 space
per unit.
4. Village on Woodlynn: 87 spaces for 60 units or 1 space for each 1.5 units.
14
5. Carefree Cottages of Maplewood: 1 space for each 1.5 units.
The VOA project would have 40 spaces for 66 units or 1. space for each .6 units. The
VOA project is similar to an assisted living project for seniors in Roseville called
Rosewood Estates. This project has 68 units. I have visited this project at different
times and days. They have had between 9 and 14 cars parked there.
Parking lot setback requirement:
Section 36-109(a) of the City Code requires that "An open parking stall shall be a
mmu um distance of fifteen feet from a dwelling -unit window."
SITE HISTORY
February 1, 1968: The City Council vacated Hazel Street from Cope to Castle Avenues.
June 26, 1969: The City Council approved building and site plans for the Maplewood
Care Center.
COPE AVENUE HISTORY
October 1985: The City Engineering Department prepared a feasibility study for
building Cope Avenue between Hazel and Ariel Streets. This study also determined the
alignment of Cope Avenue from white Bear Avenue to Hazel Street.
June 1988: The City Engineering Department updated the feasibility study for Cope
Avenue.
June 27, 1988: The City Council ordered the construction of Cope Avenue (street and
utilities) from Hazel Street to Ariel Street. The City built this project in 1989.
PAST CITY ACTIONS ON OTHER TAX-EXEMPT HOUSING BONDS
10 -8 -84: The Council gave preliminary approval for $3.8 million of tax- exempt bonds
for the Maple Ridge Apartments at 1695 East County Road D.
1- 14 -85: The Council gave preliminary approval for $5.8 million of tax- exempt bonds
for up to 100 units for the Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence at 2696
Hazelwood Avenue.
2- 11 -85: The Council gave preliminary approval for $8.5 million of tax- exempt bonds
for the 180 -unit Beaver Creek (Pondview) Apartments at 2565 and 2585 Ivy
Avenue.
15
11- 25 -85: The Council gave preliminary approval for $6.5 million of tax- exempt bonds
for the 116 -unit Harmony School (Casey Lake) Seniors Residence (County
Road C and White Bear Avenue). This was subject to construction beginning
within one year. (The developers never built this project.)
12- 31 -85: The City issued $4.8 million of tax- exempt bonds to build the Silver Ridge
Apartments.
June 1986: The Council gave final approval of $2.9 million in tax- exempt bonds for
the Century Ridge Apartments at 89 North Century Avenue.
1987 -88: The Council approved $2,448 of tax- exempt bonds for the 60 -unit
Village on Woodlynn project. The Council also approved $275,000 of tax -
increment financing.
8- 28 -89: The Council approved $5,300,000 of tax- exempt bonds for the VOA Care
Center.
12- 30 -91: The Council gave preliminary approval of $5.2 million of tax - exempt bonds
for the 108 -unit Carefree Cottages of Maplewood.
SENIOR HOUSING NEED
The current demand looks good for senior housing in the Maplewood area. The waiting
lists for the Village on Woodlynn, the Cottages of North St. Paul and the Carefree
Cottages of Maplewood total more than 300 people. As the baby boom generation ages,
there .should be a growing need for senior housing. The developer had Health Planning
and Management Resources, Inc. of Edina do a market feasibility study in 1992 for the
potential development of assisted living facility. This study showed a need for at least
111 assisted living units in the northeast Saint Paul area (Maplewood, North Saint Paul
and White Bear Lake) by 19960
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ASSISTED CARE WING FACILITY
The assisted care living environment respects the individual's right to privacy. It also
works to relieve the stress of the threat of institutionalization by providing ahome -like
(residential) setting. The proposed facility would be for seniors who now are living
with, or getting help from, family members (being the care givers ). It also is for seniors
who are living in their own home with no services. Such people often have their health
deteriorate because they do not get the services or help they need. The proposed facility
would not have the extensive regimentation and health professional supervision that a
skilled care nursing facility would provide.
16
The physical setting of the building includes private space and common space. The
private space would typically be in one - bedroom apartments. This would include
individual sleeping space, full baths, kitchen space, lockable doors, individual
temperature controls and personal furnishings. There also would be community space
including a dining room, laundry, living rooms, library and a television lounge. The
developer is proposing rents of $1,400 per month for an alcove (studio) unit to $1,800
per month for atwo- bedroom unit.
COMPETITIVENESS WITH EXISTING SENIOR RESIDENCES
The proposed project would not directly compete with the Cottages, Archer Heights or
Concordia Arms residences. This is because the VOA facility would have more services
available and the VOA intends it for less mobile older persons. The design of this
development would most likely attract persons similar to those living at Hazel Ridge.
Hazel Ridge's rents range from $755 to $995 for one bedroom and $915 to $1,300 for
two - bedroom units. These rents include a laundry on each floor. Health aids and dining
are available at Hazel Ridge for additional costs. Hazel Ridge has 16 parties on their
waiting list. Since the City approved tax - exempt financing for Hazel Ridge, it is
reasonable to approve similar financing for the VOA project.
go:b- 5:voa3.mem (11)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
3. Property Line /Zoning Map (Existing)
4. Property Line /Zoning Map (Proposed)
5. Property Line Map (Cope Avenue Street Vacation)
6. Proposed Site Plan
7. Proposed Landscape Plan
8. 1985 Feasibility Study Street Map
9. VOA Zone Change Statement
10. VOA Density Variance Letter
11. Letter from Jeffrey Fenske
12. Alley Vacation Resolution
13. Cope Avenue Street Vacation Resolution
14. Zoning Map Change Resolution
150 Tax- exempt Financing Resolution
16. Housing Program
17. Density Variance Resolution
18. Parks Commission Minutes
19. Site Plan, Building Elevations and landscaping Plan (Separate Attachment)
17
Attachment 1
D
d Maricta„
P V
� O
Lti • 'w 0
0
,`
z e
a EDGEHIL L RD. .. •
DES AVE, '
)KS AVE BROOKS . Q
EL Ey .
AVE. � •
;EX FA z �, A ••
r
VE. w . •:
vs cERVAS GERVAIS AVE. %
ar -
IEw AVE,
D& X •
�-
AWL Ca
AVE. COP VE
q t LARK < AVE. -�
• fir, a LAURIE •. ~ RD.
?. z o
LAURIE Z RD.
�T AVE
CO. RD. B '
> � i 700 0
L BURKE/AVE .
0
0
3: :•• _
P** 64 ti
now �0► �o�t ,
HARRIS AVE. — !•.. •
ROSEW000 AVE. N. ., `•
ROS D N BEY COUNTY . .
AV. �Q� AVE. S. / • -
f NORTH S
AVE. 0
A • •+ •• •� ♦. • • • ♦ • • •• •
•
GOLF �� HOLL OWAY
Q cO LMSE • I i
O
SU MMSt AVE.
AMW I 0 ^ > 1 4�
LOCATION MAP
4
N
18
RADATZ
AVE.
o�
:. • :� t.�
.+ . •. •. •. ti •.... . •
t•
RAMSEY
.
NORTH S4 lNT
COUNTY
.
� • &16
COURT
•
o
A VE.
Lo �
v
39-
..
�• •
Lti • 'w 0
0
,`
z e
a EDGEHIL L RD. .. •
DES AVE, '
)KS AVE BROOKS . Q
EL Ey .
AVE. � •
;EX FA z �, A ••
r
VE. w . •:
vs cERVAS GERVAIS AVE. %
ar -
IEw AVE,
D& X •
�-
AWL Ca
AVE. COP VE
q t LARK < AVE. -�
• fir, a LAURIE •. ~ RD.
?. z o
LAURIE Z RD.
�T AVE
CO. RD. B '
> � i 700 0
L BURKE/AVE .
0
0
3: :•• _
P** 64 ti
now �0► �o�t ,
HARRIS AVE. — !•.. •
ROSEW000 AVE. N. ., `•
ROS D N BEY COUNTY . .
AV. �Q� AVE. S. / • -
f NORTH S
AVE. 0
A • •+ •• •� ♦. • • • ♦ • • •• •
•
GOLF �� HOLL OWAY
Q cO LMSE • I i
O
SU MMSt AVE.
AMW I 0 ^ > 1 4�
LOCATION MAP
4
N
18
S r �
4w : �t • M
Apo lull-
• , + . O
•P1 tit • j \��■ •�
if
Lo
J t
In
•x•11 f =1 • M ..:
4W AD- 4W
..... '
e =L% M Muc
we e
t -
, limit 1111111113
/ones m ania
Iow-
INNIS �...
maw a
® e
• ate_ � _ � _ fLL • a� � .. _• a � �
r
•
Attachment 3
• ( N
050
3
BA
LI -HAI
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
1110101s".
— j
3
L
r o '1
L
2272 � I I LJ
-� I1 03 1 `� 2272 2271
11940
• U
2264
_ _ _ _ _ _ — os Ig4reoo t
z w ;� �.., ��. 2263 J' o
22.60 (25) 2261 W a ao Y. 33)o C` s)
p Z 3 2 p I �- t W
C* � o �.� �---, . -2262
C zb 2256 2259.
22`55 0 4 0
:lk DAYCARE CENTER 4 �a cc re 2256 ���`;',
z .... �. (, v
3 N o L ARK ' _
w 2250 2249 • •, .
Vona
' 2242 � •� �(�
1 b �a 1 224 w
°-° • - - ° z o r o 1 v e► 0 5 . 41ac.
• . .42 O. r
M
R1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R3 = MULTIPLE DWELLINGS NC = NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
-
(EXISTING)
PROPOSED ZONING MAP CHANGE (R7 TO R3)
20
, o � • 13 (3) co
ISO
` C
� 9
� 14 (4) 10
�
L BC
WE. Its
6 ♦ �
FOREST PRODUCTS °
O
1933 1941
- - - b-*8='
HIGHWAY �- - - - - -� �- � I NG ■
43 23Z -K
t5 t W H • T. 430L322
15 • •
� C 8 J' � ' Ito
/ o
Q"
1I M 19 I 2 25 27282
♦ 5 6 7 8 9 1 ' A. � � 2 4 *' � 4� ,.
t14 •40 o F" 192 4 t �l
♦ �. .? CO
• ^ • .• W 3 VAGA T e. r , 32 52
1 6 1
N
Attachment.
a � •
(4) 13 (3)
♦ •
D uo t_ —
S ♦ 10 9
fob 14
Z %0
fo • 'V
FOREST PRODUCTS
O� Fa J
LBC
IL,
.�Pvy �� 1 t 1925 1933 1941
so
o v�
HIGHWAY 36 r
■ ! I N G
♦��� ����� ..430232
• � � � �-- EMT .
♦ / �'
� 1St
We � . 7 4� GL Y S
32
Ts _ =
r - - - -
D 8 . 41 "1
t0 � �
♦ / p
� � !1 �l7 19 1 25 2 � a 2
2
W , `
5 6 7 8 9! QO 1
• 1922 0 - ) �•
4#
� a z
n W 3 VAGA T �- 32 • _ _
, O w �oe
65)
PROPOSED ALLEY VACATION 6� 5 4 3 2 1 1 1! V 1 1 11 10 9 7 4 3
9? w. _ ,
3 L7 t
- --
�M��• ;; •• •iii NyJ ~i•.� jj •• N i•�• , �:. _• ^ t �►T E D
3 ,- - - - - -- r- -�- r
r 1937
25 7
20 21 '� r .._ . 1 1 � ��
BALI -HAI 9 7 �..
,' Ia _ f 9
1 16 17 19 27 28 2
17 23 24 00 z t i
� i 6 X o ,• I t .� .� 1 0 �.0� .. 1 lie
• w y N
• iii • ••• �•�••:'iii •~; •�••�';;:::••:.i•�i•Ni h••N K i� ��h. ����� •S; ••�:: •• .••�:•w;•:;::::
��•��.•� • .. •�•••.•••�.•�w•N••N.•.... • �•• •• ff__ t �.. N w ••. ••h.hw N• N�.i••i••h•w•hy•h- �..•,
. • ••t h��•i ••.•s iJN•. hi•h.•w
~�' "" i• COPE AVENUE
• ;.5.=': :l•�::i.'t�• • '"::i`�%i 7=;: ;s..S:••::�:JJ::;:l �:! w w •i w ..w. •. , 1
•• 7. 5 147.395 o (,�0 30 - � -- - •• 17I,o
N 2271 2.272
. ► t CZ3) , 3 ` o p � J 5} I 1 1 ED STREET VACATION 1 0 3 3 �, 2272 2271 W 1
PROPOS _ _ 11940
IF I't _ V
W r" 2 2 6 4, (1 �� �""� Q
-. — — — — — — Ooh Ig4�800 _ _
w 2263 .
e (4 � o �5� 2261 W a, �° 33 o
2 •� _ — —v .. -- W .2262
) �b 2256 2255. 4 )
2255 H- Q a o
,
=! DAYCARE CENTER Y r 4 225
a - p LARK " w 2250 2249 •
N 4v
_ •
cc
2242 i, x"(
i !i _ ? oto 2241 5
11 1 ,d ��
= NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
(PROPOSED) N
21
.LINES R3 = MULTIPLE DWELLINGS NC
LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
Attachment 5
130 .�, 41 -- -- --
G ER VA t
22(.. 5
i �� +�o�� I I 1� i p �3 7,
0
e-04r+- ISO 100
(5)
100 �1
2.774w.. 0 0
13 i� a 2 �z)
(4) a Ct: tA
X13)
,4 rd
14 (-4) 0 10
So (7)
IZ5
+
3 tv.
1-'*; (5) 15
rl * %k
z 5
0
V6
o
)16
0 16
ot
i 4 k0:110
V K NG
HIGHWAY 36 *14WYESM'r TS."43023Z-W.
• HWY E6MT
To H 0
T S. 43OL32. 4
L - t- - - - - - - - - - q- 7
08 S a)i T So l
vl w
2 7 18 19 28 2 2 24 2!
lir 2 vrr
.1 lcir At kr
L'
fn / (+
CC) 17 PROPOSED ALLEY VACATION
o t4 to
11E ��� o ` - .
o� 03 -` - - - --
•
.3
Jp
Jop
Z
�a 40
do
Alp
V)
s Jew (2
7 Cl
GA W tv, . N
/f 71r-
Ir �� pol
0 0
* 0
-7
x7,o
�o
A f
A .
9271937
I %oww IMP% IV um I'm %j Kw- C-A W1
40 30 J6
WIN
7 2 2 2 7 1 ui
w V 2 2 7 'Art
PROPERTY LINE MAP
by tih
STAFF PROPOSED VACATION FOR COPE AVENUE
if 2! -
Attachment 6
wpjw .lost .a cal"
ttOMM
s tawaes
a. r ••�..� ml s tlal loam* w �++•e sw< >, rem" owdow
all x +Armes rX
w f >K�
� s U"a
mum" W-
ra mss" wo t arr is ow • wm a s a&
- am vjw tti It am 4Awc
arw orwas awe ru a otwo a s Air s
Mwl Y ftws is A• som rt► t t
zoom Ai l71di i r< aa�rdl _
sl � aal r,irs !anal nol /cools Ono" r"Iws./ sr
amowom
A #-.r w ltd ow tm AL It =~a &W l - :'M fi
IA[ s Olga = it Am -" Y wcas s wu sw "Ma u/
.R
{iMi_= asa R11A .
own T► _ '
qM =WWM -1 Cw
ft rldowo 4*w4ow WI OL t or
wow Isrsllsz
• aoc.r -
in u our wiot ON •.a tunes s Cohn
= • �ww No • E
SFI
sal •r R Ij AVENU&,
a Gaels •e.• �, - 10 ru slat tArr.ar.t =w "ri ' - _ - Sir ` `:' \ ���:• \ .
•.ar eu lac to .rn *• sr s nl a" ++ welt „ � 1 T
oset c+as st► +.aln wpwe. SWIM ff- a. K" • 61 is a. « ry
a Ism i
t Poo= s as - 4 IrRU AS t, I it
AOt1• . ft*W • Wow on New I a 9~ awmD Of w / � / �` - � - / 1 t ; \ ; `4 •\ .. \�` ♦,\ y 1
Sagan 9
a as�ss ' •
r r+4 - . t�s+rw IM1 � t lttA t t.rr sot rr A • !ta +w er � / / II � 1 � •,�/ •OOfi L - � ` \\ � \ \ ; \ ; � •` � ♦ �` �` i
t M/osii ' r•e� om at• t loll ! 1• SW ! tae Dill► • • �ItS t I i ;..: ' �.• � \. `
s rr/rra� vans � I � P ' Y . '� 1 1 • , ,� ':. � ���ti�
a K. rslt to taatrs w w PI Iw Ata of •CIS a ■ S *r At
Innr�re s loaf. SNI AN out osas wolm � � I ;� •
a tAel AI. t !Old W4 ff a sw or m 44 ll rates `
ca alraw w t war what s r - ft a +al aR 400 VIP Syr s ! / ► 1 f • 1 I ' I •• \ \
IL
. r =2 v Ir cwt is t I.Itlla .�s s ss• n • wto eue ula 1 1 AK
av tno t. t sl»ras N tx or sr s rues so stl arc Gloat (/)
.etta ros i o U It rr &AIM - UN T
al�rlt tltto 74a.,% S VT / \ 1 ♦ \� "
r atrat� rsts alal r t r a�a� s � s` ar *l► UZO w tot �
Il
oll
10 JUG
. h•
�� , / 1 / � / 1 awl � , 1� •
t
j�
/
.. �..�..- w �� i. • R r X I sit y
VACATED COPE AVENUE
ITE PLAN
O1 .. FN
o
-colt cow.
--- - - - - -- -mom WI
�WI
SITE MAP
N
23
k--
1�-sar t - - - - --•
FAY
Lantz- 6oggio Architects. E.C. _
MAM WOM AI *00TA
Arcwwft Nre1Rt Caltliallts
i
W
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
S nTf Pwkway. 4ile SM. fn*wlwut f iiraIN, finm
SITE MAP
N
23
k--
1�-sar t - - - - --•
Attachment 7
.tea
.M r err %PM~
S FAWN" r•�
am. uw
Aim
r ��r OMM opr 1r
w�wmrWAMI0rw
AM
M M 1*r�. fr 11.x/
alemboffine *saw
Meow mom saw
r.1f�aMr. AMOMAr ..r
CAP—
wpm
9=00 a r an • r Mdr/ • • OM MM Ills 6 � b i MAW
awftdw w•rrt,
�1t.�11rr�Y�.1ir•�•�� M�Iw
M M1Mw w rdoor MO rr rii rM r %loopa
MWrrGMUdMI O Y00 GOMMM��bft" oft amft*
• W yy r 'y111 lMftd r r" Mr. 1rr M 1 !r r•
�. � •.r.r rar.ri
L..a�rNd 1�M•brbrr�.
somolmd M� Won 4� %dam pwoor b pw of o ftb-r
� rr�rr.���w�i�t��•id
WERREN AVENUE
MAP
t
LANDSQk% PLAN
w � or down rA1~ dr so 1 • • � � � •
of w=rnr 1 rMUw aft. ft y a 6 97 =oft
4�w
�r �M
I I t
MAPt� M ASZM CARE WK FAaM
— g io Architects: P.C.
i f F
WA MOM h*#*S RA
i 3
W
VOLUNTEERS OF AMEPUCA
=0 DW rrk kft $a A40 an catorub SM
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN
Attachment 8
rd
TRUNK
P
�Q.
t� ' f
lop
"ft 00
FU �—
N
RE .0 W.
ago . �-
•-
• 400:0"�� dodo PROPOSED
CITY OF
MAPLE'WODD
R.O.W.
STORM SEW. ESM�T. -
cn
LARK
AVE.
I�
III II
II �i
� I I LAURIE RD.
QII NII
-N-
200 � 2 400
SCALE I ° = 200
1985 FEASIBILITY STUDY
25
HIGHWAY
S y s or
o s
•�� COV
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
HEALTH SERVICES
7530 Market Place Drive 0 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 • (612) 941 -0305
1.) a. No proposed development at this time
b. No new construction
Attachment 9
2.) The proposed re- zoning would be consistent with the neighborhood Land Use
Plan (see attachment #1). The property is designated in the neighborhood
plan R -3 or multi - dwelling. There is an existing Care Center on the property
north and east of the proposed re -zone areas. To the west is Van Dyke and
White Bear Avenue; to the south is Cope Street and three property owners
adjacent to the south edge of Cope. The western most 29th ft. of the property
is owned by the City of Maplewood and the east 197 ft by private owners.
R -3 re- zoning will enhance and protect the character of the adjacent
residential and commercial properties by providing a "noise and visual buffer"
between the high speed and volume of vehicles passing on white Bear
Avenue and Highway #36, as well as, the commercial development to the
west and southwest of the property.
There are adequate public facilities to service the site; and egress to Van
Dyke; storm sewer in Van Dyke; water services in Van Dyke. Any project at
this time would be senior's oriented and would not require any school or park
impact consideration.
Additionally, the property as it is developed can and would address any
existing issues of traffic and parking problems caused by the adjacent
Maplewood Care Center.
The existing property would be extremely difficult to develop as R -1 and by
re- zoning to R -3, development will be encouraged and therefore an unsightly
and hazardous property will be developed to improve the "quality of life" in
the neighborhood.
26
Attachm e
G k
, fib C�
VOLUNTEE O F AMERICA HEALTH SERVICES
7530 Market Place Drive
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 -3692
(612) 941 -0305
Fax (612) 941 -0428
August 11, 1993
Delivered
Mr. Geoff Olson
Community Development Department
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
kG
Dear Geoff:
. I appreciate the effort and good communication you and your staff have provided
with regard to the approval of Volunteers of America's proposed "Assisted Living Facili
p g y
in Maplewood.
We are applying for a variance relative to density, as shown in your zoning standards.
I refer to Table 5 "Estimated Persons per Dwelling Unit and Planned Maximum Density of
Dwelling Units ".
Per your explanation, the project would potentially be categorized as senior
apartments, therefor the people limit would be for alcove 1.0, one- bedroom 1.1 and two -
Bedroom. 2.0. With the existing acreage in the site (3.1) the approximate people on the site
could be 71. With our present mix of units, we have 10 Studios, 50 one - bedrooms, and 6
two - bedrooms or by your count 77 people on the site.
We ask for consideration of variance to allow 77 people on the site. Our reasoning
follows
Your zoning standards and Table 5 does not address Assisted Living Facilities
specifically.
We submit to you that Assisted Living Residents profiles are different than
Independent Living Senior Residents (Apartments).
27
Attachment 10, #2
Mr. Geoff Olson
August 11, 1993
page 2
* The profile of residents in one - bedroom units is:
Average 82 years old
85% Female
40% with some physical p roblem
Living alone
* It is our experience that the one- bedroom units only ave one occupant,
pant,
therefore the constant should be 1.0 for Assisted Living for one -
bedrooms.
g
.
* It is our experience that the two - bedroom units average 25 - 30 o g % double
occupancy, therefore the constant should be 1.3 for Assisted Livin g Facilities
for two- bedrooms.
* There is a hardship created by the 1.1 constant being applied at this site
g pp due
to the fact the units do not return revenue at 1.1 but rather at a 1.0 rate.
* Further there are no negative impacts to the City f Maplewood with regard
Y p ga d
to traffic, services, precedent, or other factors. The project has minimal
. . p J
traffic, minimal utility (water, sewer, etc.) and because of internal care
minimal emergency responses as compared to other multi -unit or multi-famil
uses.
* There is no alteration of essential character of the area rather t er an
improvement to the area.
* The site is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance.
The project is consistent with the ordinance in that the number of units
and types of units for this type of project, Assisted Livin g, is not
addressed specifically by the Ordinance and;
One- bedroom units in an Assisted Living Facility have only g Y y one
occupant in actual use.
28
Attachment 10, #3
Mr. Geoff Olson
August 11, 1.993
Page 3
Therefore, the spirit of the ordinance is being met in that actual use is generating
people /acre and the total count allowable on this site.
Sincerel
,y Andersen
President - Finance
29
Attachment 11
RITTER & FENSKE, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
461 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
JEROME A. RITTER SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55103 (612) 222 -6700
JEFFREY J. FENSKE FAX 222 -1263
June 2, 1993
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
City of Maplewood
Office of Community Development
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Neighborhood Survey for Proposed Zoning Changes
for Maplewood Cage Center
Our File No. 1450 -1
Dear Mr. Roberts,
Please be advised that I have been retained to represent Jerome and
Maureen Dal nes regarding real estate located on Cope Avenue that would
be, affected by the proposed zoning changes requested by the owners of
the Maplewood Care Center. Please allow this letter to be the response
of my clients to the neighborhood survey that you sent to them dated
May 24, 1993.
My clients own property that fronts Cope Avenue in the middle of the
block between Van Dyke and Hazel Streets and is legally described as:
Except the East 150 feet, the North 110 feet of the East Half
of Lot One ( 1) , Block Three (3), Smith and Taylor's Addition.
Approving application no. 3, the vacation of the street right -of -way
for undeveloped Cope Avenue between Van Dyke and Hazel Streets, would
result in my clients' parcel of real estate being land locked. This
interference with my clients' property right, the right of access, would
result, in effect, in this property being taken by the City. The
implementation of this proposed street right -of -way vacation would so
interfere with my clients' use of their land so as to constitute a
tacking. Implementation of this vacation would substantially reduce the
value of my clients' property.
As a result, my clients object to the applications of the owners of the
Maplewood Cage Center unless my clients would be adequately compensated
for this interference by the City with their use of their real estate.
My clients would certainly entertain proposals to compensate them for
this interference; but, absent such compensation, my clients would
strenuously object to the applications,
30
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
June 2, 1993
Page 2
If the city has any proposals that they wish for us to entertain to deal
with the issue raised in this objection, please forward those proposals
to us for consideration as soon as possible. Thank you.
sincerely,
R1 TIER & FEN5KE , L.TD ,.
Jeffrey J. Fenske
JJF:lh
cc. Jerome and Maureen. Dal nes
31
ALLEY VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America (VOA) is requesting that the City vacate the
following described alley:
All the alley between Lots 1 -12 and Lots 18 -27 in Block 9, Dearborn Park between
the vacated Hazel Street and the east line of the right -of -way for White Bear Avenue..
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this alley signed a petition for this
vacation;
2. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission,
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will
go to the following abutting properties:
Lots 1 -9, Block 9 (including vacated Hazel Street accruing) and Lots 18 -27,
Block 9 (including vacated Hazel Street accruing), Dearborn Park,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described vacation for the following reasons:
1. There is no need for this alley.
2. The City does not build alleys.
3. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded alleys.
This vacation is subject to the retention of a drainage and utility easement over the
south 10 feet of the east 30 feet.
Adopted on 9 1993.
32
STREET VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is requesting that the City vacate the foll owing
described street:
The Cope Avenue right -of -way between Lots 13 -27 in Block 9, Dearborn Park and
Block 3, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North Saint Paul that is between the west
line of Hazel Street extended and the east line of Van Dyke Street extended and the
right -of -way for White Bear Avenue, except the south 30 feet of the east 150 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street right -of -way signed a
petition for this vacation;
2. On September 8., 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Plarming Conunission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will
go to the following abutting properties:
Lots 13 -27, Block 9 (including vacated Hazel Street accruing), Dearborn Park, (Pin
11- 29- 22- 32- 0011); the west one -half of Lot 1, Block 3, Smith and Taylor's Addition
to North Saint Paul (Pin 11- 29- 22 -33- 0022); except the east 150 feet, the north 110
feet of the east one -half of Lot 1, Block 3, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North Saint
Paul (Pin 11- 29 -22 -33 -0023) and; the east 150 feet of the north 110 feet of Lot 1,
Block 3, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North Saint Paul (Pin 11- 29- 22 -33- 0024).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described vacation because it is in the public interest. It is in the public interest
because:
1. There is no need for this right -of -way.
2. The adjacent properties have adequate street access.
3. The vacation will prevent through traffic from going through the neighborhood
to the east.
33
This vacation is subject to the retention of a public .trail and utility easement over the
right -of -way.
Adopted on , 19930
34
RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America (VOA) applied for a change in the zoning map
from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located east of White Bear Avenue and
between the vacated Sherren and Cope Avenues.. The legal description is:
Lots 1 -27, Block 9, Dearborn Park (including streets and alleys accruing thereto).
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve the change.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the
zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the
use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan
is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
40 The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,
and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
S. The proposed change would be consistent with the existing land use plan
designation for this property.
Adopted on , 19930
35
ATTACHMENT 15
Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the
City Council of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota
Pursuant to the call and notice thereat, a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota,
was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 27th
day of September, 1993, at 7 :00 P.M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member
introduced the following
resolution in writing and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A DEVELOPMENT UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTES,,CHAPTER 462C,
THE ISSUANCE OF HEALTH CARE FACILITY
REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE THE DEVELOPMENT,
AND THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE VOA CARE CENTERS,
MINNESOTA PROJECT
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by member
and, after dispensation
by unanimous consent of the reading of the resolution in full,
after full discussion of the resolution, and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
2"922
It 36
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A DEVELOPMENT UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C,
THE ISSUANCE OF HEALTH CARE FACILITY
REVENUE BONDS TO FINANCE THE DEVELOPMENT,
AND THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS
IN CONNECTION WITH THE VOA CARE CENTERS,
MINNESOTA PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood,
Minnesota (the "City "), proposes to issue up to $6,000,000
revenue bonds for VOA Care Centers, Minnesota Project and
sufficient details of the revenue bonds and other aspects of the
financing have been agreed to that this final bond resolution
should be adopted on this date:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Proposal -The council has received a proposal from
VOA Care Centers, Minnesota (.the "Company "), that the City
undertake to partially finance a certain Project as herein
described pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, which
governs municipal housing programs (the "Act ") , through issuance
by the City of its Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds, Series
1993 (VOA Care Centers, Minnesota Project) in an amount not to
exceed $6,000,000 .(the "Bonds "), and in accordance with a Bond
Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement ") from Dougherty,
Dawkins, Strand & Bigelow Incorporated (the "Purchaser "), and
confirmed and accepted by the City, Company and the Volunteers of
America Care Facilities and Volunteers of America Health Sciences
(collectively, the "Guarantors "),
2. Project The Company desires to construct 66 new
multifamily rental housing units for occupancy primarily by the
elderly, connected by a link to the existing nursing home,
located at 1900 Sherren Avenue in the City (the "Project ") . The
Project as described above will further the policies and purposes
of the Act.
3. Structure It is proposed that, pursuant to a Loan
Agreement dated as of October 1, 1993, by and between the City as
lender and the Company as borrower (the "Loan Agreement ") , the
City loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company to partially
finance the cost of the Project. The Basic Payments to be made
by the Company under the Loan Agreement are fixed so as to
produce revenue sufficient to pay the principal of, premium, if
any, and interest on the Bonds when due. It is further proposed
that the City assign its rights to the basic payments and certain
other rights under the Loan Agreement to First Trust National
Association, in St. Paul, Minnesota (the "Trustee "J, as security
2 "922 37
for payment of the Bonds under an Indenture of Trust dated as of
October 1, 1993 (the "Indenture" ) , and that the Company ant a
a e and security Y g
.mortgage rity interest in the Project to the City
pursuant to a Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of October
1 1993 (the "Mortgage"),, and, to further secure the payment of
the Bonds and the interest thereon, enter into an Assignment of
Leases and Rents dated as of October 1, 1993 (the "Assignment of
Leases and Rents "). The Guarantors will enter into Guaranty
Agreements dated as of October 1, 1993 (collectively the
"Guaranty "), in favor of the Trustee with respect to the
Company's p
pang s obligations under the Loan Agreement. The Purchaser
proposes to buy the Bonds pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and
to offer the Bonds for sale to the public pursuant to an Official
Statement to be dated on or about the date of the delivery of and
payment for the Bonds (the "O f f i c is 1 Statement ") .
4. Forms of Documents Submitted Pursuant to the
preliminary approval of the Council, forms of the following
documents have been submitted to the Council for approval:
(a) The Loan Agreement;
(b) The Indenture;
(c) The Mortgage (not to be executed by the City);
(d) The Assignment of Leases and Rents (not to be
executed by the City);
(e) The Guaranty (not to be executed by the City);
(f) The Purchase Agreement; and
(g) The Preliminary Official Statement, as the
operative draft on the date hereof of the Official Statement
(not to be executed by the City).
5. Findings It is hereby found, determined and
declared that:
(a) the Project described in the Loan Agreement and
Indenture constitutes a multifamily housing development
authorized by, and furthers the purposes of the Act;
(b) the findings and conclusions made by the City in
connection with the adoption of the City's housing program for
the Project under the Act are hereby reaffirmed;
(c) the purpose of the Project is, and the effect
thereof will be, to promote the public welfare by the
construction and equipping of a facility for use as a multifamily
246922 8
3
housing development designed primarily for occupancy by elderly
and handicapped persons, combined with a health care facility;
(d) the Project is to be located within the City
limits, at a site which is easily accessible to employment
opportunities, health facilities and other amenities within the
City and the surrounding communities;
(e) the Act authorizes the construction and
installation of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds,
the execution and delivery by the City of the Loan Agreement,
Purchase Agreement and Indenture, the performance of all
covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Loan
Agreement, Purchase Agreement and Indenture, and the performance
of all other acts and things required under the constitution and
laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement,
Purchase Agreement, Indenture and Bonds valid and binding
obligations of ' the City in. accordance with their terms;
(f) it is desirable that the Company be authorized,
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Loan
Agreement, which terms and conditions the City determines to be
necessary, desirable and proper, to complete the construction and
installation of the Project by such means as shall be available
to the Company and in the manner determined by the Company, and
with or without advertisement for bids as required for the
acquisition and installation of municipal facilities;
(g) it is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the
City upon the terms sat forth in the Indenture;
(h) the Basic Payments under the Loan Agreement are
fixed to produce revenue sufficient to provide for the prompt
payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the
Bonds issued under the Indenture when due, and the Loan
Agreement, Mortgage and Indenture also provide that the is
required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of
the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate
insurance thereon and insurance. against all liability or injury
Y 7 Y`Y
to persons or property arising from the operation thereof, and
all taxes and special assessments levied upon or with respect to
p
the Project Premises and payable during the term of the Mortgage,
Loan Agreement and Indenture; and
(i) under the provisions of the Act, and as provided
in the Loan Agreement and Indenture, the Bonds are not to be
payable from or charged upon any funds other than the revenue
pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any
liability thereon; no holder of any Bonds shall ever have the
right to compel any exercise by the City of its taxin g powers to
pay any of the Bonds or the interest or premium thereon, or to
enforce payment thereof against any property of the City except
246922
39
the interests of the City in the Loan Agreement which have been
assigned to the Trustee under the Indenture; the Bonds shall not
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable
upon any property of the City except the interests of the City in
the Loan Agreement which have been assigned to the Trustee under
the Indenture; the Bonds shall recite that the Bonds do not
constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or moral
obligation of the.City, the state or its political subdivisions,
and that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable
solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; and the
Bonds shall not constitute.a debt of the City within the meaning
of any constitutional or statutory limitation.
60 Approval of Forms; Execution Subject to the
approval of the City Attorney and the provisions of Section 10,
the Loan Agreement, Purchase Agreement and Indenture and exhibits
thereto and all other documents listed in paragraph 4 hereof are
approved substantially in the forms submitted (except as
otherwise provided for the Official Statement in paragraph 7
hereof. The Loan Agreement and Indenture, in substantially the
fora submitted, are directed to be executed in the name and on
behalf of the City by the Mayor and City Clerk. Any other City
documents
uments and certificates necessary to the transaction described
above shall be executed by the appropriate City officers. Copies
of all of the documents necessary to the transaction herein
described shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided
i p
herein and n the Loan Agreement and Indenture.
7. Official Statement. The City has been presented
with a draft of the Official Statement (in the form of the
Preliminary Official Statement), which is to be completed and
dated on or about the date of the delivery of and payment for the
Bonds. The City hereby consents to the presentation of
information relating to the City in the Official Statement under
the caption "The Issuer ". The City hereby finds that the
information in the section of the Official Statement captioned
"The Issuer" does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any fact which'is necessary to make the
statements made therein not misleading, and hereby approves in
substantially the form submitted "to. the City Council at this
meeting such information for inclusion in the Official Statement;
and the City hereby ratifies, confirms and consents to the use of
said section in the Official Statement in connection with the
sale,of the Bonds. The City has not prepared nor made any
independent investigation of the information contained in the
Official Statement other than the section therein captioned "The
Issuer", and the City takes no responsibility for such
information. Subject to the statements above in this ara ra h
the p g p
City approves the form of the Official Statement and
authorizes its use in connection with the sale of the Bonds by
the Purchaser.
246922 40
8* Issuance; Acceptance of Offer Subject to Section
11, the City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds, in the
form and upon the terms set forth in* the Indenture. The Bonds
shall bear interest at the rate or rates established b the M
or Y
and agreed'to by the Purchaser and Company, but in no event shall
the interest rate or rates be fixed at rates which would cause
the net interest cost of the Bonds to exceed nine p ercent ( 9%) .
p
The rate or rates so established shall be set forth in the
Indenture prior to its execution. The offer of the Purchaser to
purchase the Bonds for at a price not less than 98% of the face
amount of the Bonds plus accrued interest to the date of delivery
at the interest rate or rates to be so established is hereby
accepted, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute the Purchase Agreement when the principal
amount and the rate or rates have been so established. The Mayor
and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to re are and
P p
execute the Bonds as prescribed in the Indenture and to deliver
them to the Trustee for auChentication and delivery to the
Purchaser.
9. Records and Certificates The Mayor and City Clerk
and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to
prepare and furnish to the Purchaser certified copies of all
proceedings and records Of the City relating to the Bonds and
such other affidavits and certificates as may required ired to show
�
the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts
appear from the books and records in the officers' custody nd
control or as o •
otherwise known to them; and all such certified
copies, certificates and an affidavits, including heretofore
Y furnished,* shall constitute representations of the City as to the
truth of all statements contained therein.
10* Changes in Forms Approved; Absent and Disabled
Officers The approval hereby given to the various documents
referred to above includes approval of such additional details
therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such
modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto
as may be necessary and appropriate and approved -by the City
Attorney and by the City officials authorized herein to execute
or accept, as the case may be, said documents prior to their
execution; and said City officials are hereby authorized to
approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any
instrument by' the appropriate officer or officers of the City
herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of
such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the event
of absence or disability of the Mayor or City Clerk, any of the
documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be
executed without further act or authorization of the City Council
by the Acting Mayor or the Acting City Clerk, respectively, or b
p •y• Y
such other officer or officers of the City as, in the opinion of
the City Attorney, may act in their behalf.
246922 41
11. No Designation of Oualified Tax - Exempt
Obligations. The Bonds exceed in amount.those which may be
qualified as "qualified tax- exempt obligations" within the
meaning of Section 2 6 5 (b) (3 ) of the Code, and hence are not
designated for such purposes.
120 Restrictions
various agreements with the
restrictions on the Company
(a) ; Construction
City Council may grant
shown.
The Company shall enter into -
City which shall impose the following
and the Project:
must begin by August 10, 1994. The
a time extension if just cause is
(b) Contracts entered into with Contractors doing work
on the Project shall provide that:
(i) the contractor shall not discriminate in the
hiring or firing of employees on the. basis of race,
color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital
status, status with regard to public assistance,
disability or age.
(ii) the contractor shall compensate employees
with wages and financial remuneration as provided under
the United States Code, Section 276A, as amended
through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes
1985-, Sections 177.41- 177.44.
the contractor shall be required to employ
Minnesota residents in at least 80% of the jobs created
by the project; and, at least 60% of the group shall be
residents of the seven- county.metro p olitan area.
Resident status under both of-the above categories
shall be determined as of the date of this resolution.
However, if the contractor can show that these quotas
are not feasible because of a ' shortage - of qualified
personnel in specific skills, the contractor may
request the City Council for a release from the two
residency requirements. The requirements shall
continue for the duration of the construction project.
'(iv) the contractor shall be an active artici ant
P P
in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by
the Department of Labor and Industry.
(v) all provisions of these tax - exempt finance
requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working
on the Project,
246922 42
(c) The Company shall pay the administrative fee to
the City determined in accordance with the City's guidelines
at closing.
Cdr The Company - shall comply with the City's tax -
exempt revenue requirements, including the optional design
requirements.
130 Headings ;.Terms Paragraph headings in this
resolution are for convenience of reference only and are not a
part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any
provision hereof. Capitalized terms used by not defined herein
shall have the meanings given them in the Indenture, Loan
Agreement or Mortgage.
Passed: September 27, 1993.
Attest:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Mayor
246922 43
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed
Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that
I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes, with the original on file in my office, and the same is
a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the
same relates to the issuance of revenue bonds.
Witness my hand and the seal of the City this 27th day of
September, 1993.
Clerk
(SEAL)
246922 44
Attachment 16
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
HOUSING FINANCE PROGRAM
VOA CARE CENTERS, MINNESOTA PROJECT
This housing finance program (the "Program ") is undertaken
by the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") to finance a
Project (as defined and described in this document) to be owned
and operated by VOA Care Centers, Minnesota, a Minnesota
nonprofit corporation (the "Company ") . The Project consists
primarily of the construction and equipping of an assisted living
senior housing facility of approximately 66 units (the
" Project "), to be constructed at 1900 Sherren Avenue, Maplewood
adjacent to the Maplewood Care Center in the City f Maplewood,
Y p ,
Minnesota, improvements to the Maplewood Care Center and the
refunding of the City of Maplewood Health Care Facility Revenue
Bonds, Series 1989 (VOA Care Centers, Minnesota Project)., The
Project will be operated as an elderly multifamil rental housing
. Y g
development within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section
462C.05, Subd, 4. The City will issue multifamily housin g revenue
bonds (the "Bonds ") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
462C..07, Subd. 1, and loan the proceeds of the Bonds to the
Company to f inance the Project.
The City will issue the Bonds to finance the Project in the
principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000. The City will loan
the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to the company pursuant
p Y P
244241
45
to a revenue agreement (the "Loan Agreement ") by and between the
City and the Company. The Company will be required, pursuant to
the Loan Agreement, to make payments sufficient to pay when due
the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on all the Bonds.
The Bonds may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever
means are available or necessary and are permitted by law to
enhance the security for and marketability of the Bonds.
Substantially all of the net proceeds of the Bonds (the initial
principal amount thereof, less amounts deposited in a reasonably
required reserve or paid out as costs of issuance of the Bonds)
will be used to pay the costs of the Project, including any
Y
functionally related and subordinate facilities.
The Project will be undertaken to further the policies and
goals stated in the City's Housing Plan, under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462C and is consistent with the City's Housing
Plan. The City has adequate existing capacity o administer,
,
monitor and supervise the Project in order to insure that the
Project will be consistent with the City's Housing Plan. The
Company will construct the Project in compliance with all
applicable development restrictions, and all new construction and
rehabilitation of the existing buildings is subject to applicable
state and local building. codes. The Company will be required to
operate the Project in accordance with state and local
anti - discrimination laws and ordinances.
244241
46
The costs of the Project and the Program undertaken to
finance the Project, including specifically the costs to the
City, will be paid or reimbursed by the Company.
244241
47
. t
DENSITY VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America applied for a variance from the density
requirements in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to the property east of White Bear Avenue and
between the vacated Sherren and Cope Avenues. The legal description is:
Lots 1 -27, Block 9, Dearborn Park (including streets and alleys accruing thereto).
WHEREAS, Table 5 of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan limits RH (residential
high density) areas to 22.8 people per gross acre.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing an assisted care living facility with 25.1 people
per gross acre.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 2.3 people per gross acre.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On September 8, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this variance.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 27, 1993. City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood, Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an
opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described variance for the following reasons:
Adopted on 2 1993.
Attachment 18
7) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) SIGNS FOR PARKS
Director Odegard stated the park sign information that will be sent
to theCity Council was in the packet. The Commission had no sign
changes at this time.
B) PARK PROJECTS
Director Odegard distributed a "System Development" memo that will
be on the July 26th City Council agenda. The list of improvements
was reviewed and their order revised. A recommendation will be made
to authorize $52,725 from the PAC Commercial Fund for "Systems De-
velopment" items to be placed in the Park Development Fund.
8) NEW BUSINES
A) HOME NEXT TO NATURE CENTER
Director Odegard stated the white house next to the Maplewood Nature
Center (2669 Seventh Street East) is for sale. Mrs. Basler has been
moved to a nursing home. An appraisal will be made of the property
(approximately 75'x 200
Commissioner Fischer MOVED that the Park and Recreation Commission
reaffirms their desire to pursue the possibil; tv of acquirina the
Bassler orooerty and- it as wart of the MaDlewood Nature
Center; second by Qualley; Ayes: All.
B) PROPERTY EAST OF HAZELWOOD PARR (KENNARD &.COUNTY ROAD C1
Director Odegard stated that property has been purchased east of
Hazelwood Park and the party is requesting permission to build
a single family dwelling. To gain access to the property, it would
be necessary to construct a driveway off.County Road C using the
unimproved Kennard Street right -of -way. The City Council will
address this issue.
Director Odegard stated that it is questionable about what happens
to the next 2.6 acres adjacent to this property thaw is owned
_privatel (the owner of that property would also need access).
9)
C
C) PROPOSAL AT VAN DYKE AND COPE
Director Odegard stated that the Volunteers of America own a Care
Center near this site. They are proposing an addition of a 66 unit'
Assisted Living Facility. They would like Cope Street closed off
for a through street, add a trail, and develop a small park on the
adjacent south property line. The city owns a lot where Van Dyke and
Cope Streets come together (300' long x 125' deep). Their proposal
states that the VOA would jointly develop the small park, but the
city would be responsible for maintenance of the park and trail.
The Park and Recreation Commission recommended that the city lot be
sold to VOA.
Commissioner Christianson inquired about the weekend activity at Hazelwood
Park. He noticed the large crowd. '
(Director Odegard stated that United Way rented the soccer facilities).
Commissioner Fischer reviewed the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan ane noticed
the Neighborhood Park Study Areas. There is considerable developrent in
the Kohlman Lake area at this time; he questioned whether there was any
park land available.
(Director Odegard had talked to Mr. Frattalone regarding the purchase of
land, but the developer only indicated that he would think about -it).
47 , 1 ?-, IJ
49
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 8 -24 -93
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
A. Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facilit - Volunteers of America, VVMte Bear
Avenue and Highway 36 (Section 11)
Deborah Perry, Jay Harkins (architect), Alan Black, Angeline Soule and Joanne
Callison were present representing Volunteers of America. Jay Harkins, architect for
this project, said the recommended condition of the staff report requiring at least a
fifteen -foot setback between the parking spaces on the south side of Sherren
Avenue drive and the porch may not be possible if Cope Avenue is not vacated. The
applicant asked that they not be required to pave the trail, but to leave it as a
wood -chip trail.
John Glassel, a neighbor, said he and some other neighbors want an asphalt trail,
rather than awood -chip trail. Mr. Glassel said he does not want any access
driveways from the parking lot to Cope Avenue. There were no other comments
from the audience.
Boardmember Robinson moved:
A. Approval of the site plan and design standards notes (stamped August 12,
1993), the building elevations (stamped June 30, 1993) and the landscape
plan (stamped August 20, 1993) for the Maplewood Assisted Care Living
Facility and the changes to the Maplewood Care Center site. The City approves
these plans subject to the following conditions:
1. This review must be repeated in two years if the City has not issued a
building permit for this project.
2. All construction shall follow the approved plans. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes in the plans. The
Community Design Review Board must approve major changes.
3. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
4. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
5. Install ahandicap - parking sign for each handicap - parking space. Handicap-
parking stalls and signs must follow ADA requirements.
6. Submit plans for the fence along the east lot line, the trash - enclosure and
the shed - enclosure fencing to the staff. The City will not issue a building
permit until the staff approves these plans.
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 8 -24 -93
7. Increase the size of the deciduous shade trees to 2 1/2 -inch balled and
burlapped. (code requirement)
8. Revise the grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to reflect the
new parking lot design. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with
the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control
Handbook. The utility plan shall show any fire hydrants required by the
City Fire Marshal. The City shall not issue a building permit until the City
Engineer approves this plan.
9. Revise the site plan to:
a. Remove the curb islands in the northerly parking lot if they are not to
be built.
b. Widen the drive aisle that serves the seven diagonal parking stalls
west of the proposed building's main entrance to 22.6 feet. (code
requirement)
c. Provide at least afifteen -foot setback between the parking spaces on
the south side of the Sherren Avenue drive and the porch. If Cope
Avenue is not vacated, the building shall be moved south to meet the
30 -foot minimum setback from Cope Avenue.
d. Replace the wood -chip trail with an eight- foot -wide paved trail.
e. Move the dumpster to the west side of the southerly parking lot.
Place the dumpster so it does not block or take up a parking space.
f. Drop the stop signs proposed on the frontage road.
10. Before the City issues a building permit for the Maplewood Care Center
addition, the Board must approve the building elevations.
11. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any
required work that is not completed by occupancy. The amount shall be
150% of the cost of the unfinished work. VOA shall fi give the staff an
agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work.
B. Approval of 92 fewer parking spaces than code requires and no garages, since:
1. Most of the residents would not drive.
Community Design Review Board -4-
Minutes of 8 -24 -93
2. The City has allowed fewer par king spaces for similar seniors housing
developments.
The property owner shall add off- street parking if the City determines there is not
enough parking.
Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -all
Vil. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitor presentations.
VIII. BOARD PRESENTATIONS
There were no Board presentations.
IX. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
A. Board Member Representative for the September 13 City Council Meeting
Secretary Ekstrand said he would ask Roger Anitzberger if he could . represent the
Community Design Review Board at the September 13 City Council Meeting. Marie
Robinson said she may be available if Roger cannot attend.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m.
Planning Commission -14-
Minutes . of 9 -8 -93
This prope next to high voltage transmission lines. Purchasers
should be aw that there is Fgoing research on adverse exposure to a
magnetic field ge erated by gh- voltage lines. As of May 1990,
scientific or health cial ave made no risk assessments to resolve
the health effects of or short term exposures to magnetic fields.
Purchasers with cone about the exposures should contact competent
medical or health* pect or agencies for current risk assessment
information.
If the developer decd to final plat pad of the preliminary plat, the City may
waive any conditio that do not apply t the final plat.
Commissioner FischeXseconded
Ayes-- Axlahl, Fischer, Kittridge, Pearson
Nays-- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Gerke, Martin
The motion
d. Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and answered questions
from the Commission. A representative from Volunteers of America gave a
presentation. There were no comments from the public.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Approval of the resolution which vacates the undeveloped alley north of Cope
Avenue, between White Bear Avenue and the Maplewood Care Center. This
vacation is subject to the City keeping a drainage and utility easement over the
south 10 feet of the east 30 feet. The City should vacate this alley because it is in
the public interest. It is in the public interest because:
1. There is no need for this alley.
2. The City does not build alleys.
3. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded alleys.
B. Adoption of the resolution which vacates part of the Cope Avenue right -of -way
between Castle Avenue. and Hazel Streets. This vacation is subject to the City
keeping a public utility and trail easement over the right -of -way. The City should
vacate this street because it is in the public interest. It is in the public interest
because:
1. There is no need for this right -of -way.
2. The adjacent properties have adequate street access.
3. The vacation will prevent through traffic from going through the
neighborhood to the east.
Planning Commission -15 -
Minutes of 9 -8 -93
C. Approval of the resolution which changes the zoning of this property from R -1
(single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings). The City bases this rezoning on
the findings required by the City code and that the R -3 zoning is consistent with
the Cites land use plan.
D. Approval of the sale of the north fifty feet (with Copy Avenue vacated) of the
undeveloped lot on the southeast corner of Cope Avenue and Van Dyke Street for
$14,865. The City declares this land as excess property because:
1. The City obtained this lot to build Cope Avenue.
2. The City does not now need this property for a street.
3. It is not in the public interest to construct Cope Avenue.
E. Adoption of the resolution which approves tax - exempt mortgage revenue
financing for up to $12 million to construct the Volunteers of America assisted
living facility and the Housing Finance Program. Approval is subject to the
following conditions:
1. Meeting the Cites requirements for tax - exempt mortgage revenue not
financing.
2. The VOA buying enough additional property to meet the Cites density
standards.
F. Take no action on the density variance request.
Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes- -all
The motion passed.
VI. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There weie no visitor ;6resentations.
VII. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
A. Representat�e for the September 13 Council Meeting: Commissioner Allenspach
VIII. STAFF PRESENTATtONS
There were�no staff vres&tations.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Mee*g adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
HR.A Minutes of 9 -14 -93
b. Volunteers of America (VOA) - Assisted Care Living Facility (Section 11)
Ken Roberts presented the staff report. Jeff Anderson, Bev Perry and Allan Black of
Volunteers of America were present and answered questions from the Commission.
Commissioner Whitcomb moved the HRA recommend:
A. Approval of the sale of the north fifty feet (with Cope Avenue vacated) of the
undeveloped lot on the southeast corner of Cope Avenue and Van Dyke Street for
$14,865. The City declares this land as excess property because:
1, The City obtained this lot to build Cope Avenue,
2. The City does not now need this property for a street.
3. It is not in the public interest to construct Cope Avenue.
Be Adoption of the resolution which approves tax - exempt mortgage revenue
financing for up to $12 million to construct the Volunteers of America assisted
living facility and the Housing Finance Program. Approval is subject to the
following conditions:
1. Meeting the City's requirements for tax - exempt mortgage revenue note
financing.
2. The VOA buying enough additional property to meet the Cites density
standards.
C. Take no action on the density variance request.
Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes - -all
z -2
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Construction Agreement Kennard Street (Eakins)
DATE: October 1, 1993
.lotion by council:
End ors e d...,_._.,..,.,,,.,
Modifie
Rejected
r
s J)ate
w
On September 27, 1993, the City Council tabled a request to use the Kennard Street
right -of -way, north of County Road C. The Council tabled this until October 11. The
Council requested an opinion from the City Attorney about the abstract for the
property.
A question came up about whether Section 9 -1 of the City Code applies. The Code
states that "No building permits will be issued for any construction within the ci
unless the building site is located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and
maintained as a city street..... the council may enter into an agreement with the
property owner for special handling of an unusual situation... ". The key phrase here is
"building site". The east end of the Lukin's lot is adjacent to County oad C. A
ty
wetland exists between this access and the proposed house location. To construct a
driveway between the house and County Road C would require that the Lukins fill q p
of the wetland for a driveway. Filling would require a permit from the Watershed
Board. The Watershed Board Administrator stated that he would recommend denial of
any permit for wetland fill for a driveway. (See his letter on page 3.) If the Watershed
Board will not approve a permit, the City should not consider that the Lukin's
"building site" is adjacent to a public street. If the Lukins build on the east side of their
site, section 9 -1 would not apply.
The Lukins have an access easement over the east half of Kennard Street. The City has
an easement for highway purposes over this same property. The City Attorney advised
me that the City's easement is dominant. Regardless of whether Section 9 -1 applies in
this situation, the City must still approve a construction agreement to build a driveway
on Kennard Street,
Section 9 -1 does not state that a property owner must use their frontage. It only states
that they must get City approval to build on a property without frontage. Though the
Eakins have frontage on County Road C, there is no ordinance that prevents the Council
from approving a driveway on Kennard Street. The decision is up to the Council. The
City Attorney recommends that "the City Council approve the requested driveway along
the Kennard Street right -of -way unless the City Council can establish that the denial of
that request would substantially advance a legitimate governmental interest." (See the
Attorney's memo on page 5.)
go/b- 5:Lukin.mem (3)
Attachments:
1. Letter from the Watershed Administrator
20 Attorney's Memo
3. September 21, 1993 Staff Report
Ramsey - Washington Metro
A
-----------
i
OCT 4, 3
i
Attachment 1
District 40 8 5 W te Bear Ave., Suite 210
Maplewood, MN 55109
(612) 777.3665
October 1, 1993
Mr. Geoff Olson
Community Development Director
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Re: Steve Lukin Home Construction Proposal
Dear Jeff:
In response to your phone call of Friday, October 1, 1993, regarding use of the Flandrau
Street right -of -way access off County Road C to the Steve Lukin property. I have reviewed and
given some thought to this alternative access to the use of the Kennard Street right -of -way. Use
of the Flandrau Street right -of -way would require filling of the. wetland area in order to route a
driveway to the proposed location of the Lukin home. The access using the Kennard Street right-
of -way would result in no -fill of the wetland.
The Wetland Conservation Act requires the analysis of a reasonable alternatives. and
requires that we seek to minimize the amount of wetland fill. In this case, the reasonable
alternative would be to use the Kennard Street right -of -way, and not use the Flandreau Street
access to the Lukin property. My staff recommendation to our Watershed Board would be to
recommend denial of any permit for wetland fill for a driveway.
Another concern would be the impact of any driveway fill on the wetland system. The
wetland in this area is relatively untouched and appears to be very stable in its current condition.
Intrusion of a driveway into this wetland area would be a visual intrusion for the homeowners
along County Road C, and would also result in changing the wetland hydrology. The driveway
across the wetland would require the installation of one or more culverts underneath the
driveway to allow for drainage from the lots on the north side of County Road C. This culvert
would concentrate flows into the remaining wetland area rather than allowing the flows to
disperse under the existing hydrologic condition. This could result in significant long term
impacts by changing the hydrology of the existing wetland. The driveway would result in
approximately 0.2 acres of fill in this wetland.
Mr. Geoff Olson
October 1, 1993
Page 2
Considering the potential impacts and the availability of reasonable alternatives, I would
recommend that Maplewood allow use of the existing Kennard Street right -of -way for access to
this property.
If you have any additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
djo
Clifton hing r
Administrator
cc : Steve Lul in
4
Attach 2
MEMO
To: City Manager and Director of Community Development
From: City Attorney
Date: October 4, 1993
Re: Construction Agreement -- Kennard Street (Lakin)
On September 27, 1993, the City Council tabled a request to use the Kennard Street right -of -way,
North of County Road C, for a driveway until October 11. The ur ose of tabling that request
p p g q
was to seek an opinion from this office regarding the existing and available access for the subject
property.
Based upon the information provided to us by Mr. Lukin and a review of the County Plat
records, it appears that Mr. Lukin owns four parcels located north of Count y Road C. Three
parcels have frontage on Kennard Street which is currently unimproved. Three of the parcels
have access to County Road C over the fourth parcel. The fourth parcel is a 33 -foot access to
County Road C.
The Director of Community Development has advised us that a wetland exists between the
proposed house location and the above - referenced private easement. The Director of
Community Development further advises us that any driveway construction along this P rivate
easement would require the filling of a part of that wetland. That filling would require a permit
from the watershed district. There are apparently significant questions as to whether such a
permit would be approved by the watershed district.
As noted in our earlier Memorandum dated September 27, 1993, a property owner such as Mr.
Lukin does have a "special right" in the access provided b the Kennard Street right-of-way. That
y
"special right" cannot be denied except by due process of law. Furthermore, there is strong
precedent to allow a property owner such as Mr. Lukin to use that public right -of -way for those
purposes which are compatible with the public use of that right-of-way.
It is the opinion of this office that Mr. Lukin has a legitimate interest in seeking to use that
public right -of -way which fronts his properties. Although the City is not under any obligation to
"improve" the dedicated right -of -way, the City cannot effectively revent Mr. Lukin from using
g
that public right -of -way unless Mr. Lukin's use would be non - compatible.
It is true that access may be available to Mr. Lukin across the private easement on the east side
of his property. Nonetheless, that access has been placed in doubt because of the response of
the watershed district. Furthermore, the City has no rational justification for depriving Mr. Lukin
of his use of the public right -of -way in favor of the private right -of -way.
5
City Manager Page Two October 4, 1993
Director of Community Development
This office concurs with the Memorandum of the. Director of Community Development dated
October 1, 1993, in which he states that: 'There is no ordinance that prevents the Council from
approving a driveway for the Lukins on Kennard Street ". In fact, to deny the Lukins any use of
the Kennard Street right-of-way would need to be sustainable under the constitutional guarantee
of due process. The question has also been raised whether the City continues to have the
authority to negotiate an agreement with the Lukins pursuant to Code §9 -1. That code section
authorizes the Council to negotiate and contract with a property owner in those "unusual
situations" where a building site is not located adjacent to an existing and maintained city street.
The primary question here seems to be whether the building site is adjacent to County Road C.
County Road C is the only existing and maintained city street relative to this particular property.
The term. "adjacent" is. not defined under the Code. The general legal definition given to the
term "adjacent" is that of a property which lies close to another property. It then becomes a
question for the Council whether the Lukin building site is sufficiently "close to" (i.e. adjacent)
County Road C..
Obviously, the practical question is whether that private easement can provide sufficient access
for the Lukin building site. From the information provided by the Director of Community
Development, the City Council could easily conclude that the private easement will not provide
an acceptable alternative for access to the building site. Furthermore, as noted above, the Lukins
continue .to possess a special interest or right in their access to the Kennard right -of -way.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the requested driveway along the Kennard
Street right -of -way unless the City Council can establish that the denial of that request would
substantially advance a legitimate governmental interest.
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Construction agreement
LOCATION: Kennard Street, north of County Road C
DATE: September 21, 1993
INTRODUCTION
Steve and Kathy Lakin are requesting that the City Council approve the construction of
a house. The house site is east of the undeveloped Kennard Street right -of -way, behind
the properties at 1667 -1697 County Road C. The site includes three separate lots
totaling 5.25 acres. (See the maps on pages 10 -11.) The Lukens have a contract for
deed on the property. They intend to combine the three existing lots into one lot.
The Eakins cannot build this house without the City Council approving a special
agreement. The house would be on property that does not front on a maintained public
street. Section 9 -1 of the City Code states that "No building permits will be issued for
any construction within the City, unless the building site is located adjacent to an
existing street which is dedicated and maintained as a City street...". The Code allows
the Council to approve an agreement with the property owner to handle an unusual
situation.
Kennard Street is an undeveloped, 66- foot -wide public right -of -way. The Lukins propose
to build a 12- foot -wide driveway on Kennard Street between their house and County
Road C. This driveway would run between the park driveway and the house at 1667
County Road C. (See Mr. Lukin's letter on page 15 and the site plan on page 13.)
DISCUSSION
Wetland Impacts
A wetland is on the east part of the site. The Watershed District has calculated that the
grading for the house would require filling about 3,400 square feet (0.08 acre) of the
wetland. The watershed district is requiring that the Lukins replace the wetland that
they fill by excavating an equal or greater area next to the wetland. (See the plan on
page 13.) An option would be to require that the Eakins move the house to the
southeast. They would then not have to fill or excavate the wetland. The Watershed
Board has approved a permit for this work.
The City Engineer is recommending that the property owner give the City an easement
over the wetland. The easement would preserve the wetland for drainage purposes. The
easement also would prohibit mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the
wetland.
Drainage
Two neighbors were concerned about the effect of the Lukin's proposal on storm water
drainage. They noted that they have problems with wet basements or yards. These
neighbors believe that this proposal will add to their drainage problems. The City
Engineer told me that putting one house on 5.25 acres would not cause additional
drainage problems. While the Lukins will be filling part of the wetland, they will
excavate an equivalent amount so there is no net loss of drainage area.
Additional Homes
There is the potential for two more houses with access from Kennard Street —one on the
Lukin's north lot and the other on the lot north of Lukins. A wetland covers the lot
north of Eakins. To fill for a house on this lot, the owner would have to find a wetland
on another lot that he could excavate.
Additional houses could be applied for on the Lukin's lots. There is room for more
houses on Kennard Street and on the higher ground that is on the east side of the
Lukin's lots. There is access to the east side from the Flandrau Street right-of-way and
g Y
a 33- foot -wide strip next to 1697 County Road C. Filling may be required for additional
houses, but part of the Lukin's lots could be excavated to allow Wig. The City should
require that the property owner do the following:
1. Deed to the City the rights to build additional houses on these lots.
2. Give the City a drainage easement over the wetland.
3. Deed the 33- foot -wide strip to the owner of 1697 County Road C or the City.
The City should also vacate Flandrau Street. This would eliminate a potential access for
another house on the Lukin's property. We have scheduled a hearing to vacate
Flandrau Street on October 11.
There are four alternatives for these properties:
1. Private drive
2. Public street
3. Deny access
4. Buy the Property for Open Space
2
Alternative 1. Private Drive
Since the house would not front on a public street, emergency vehicles may have
difficulty finding the house. The Lukins should agree:
1. To hold the City harmless from any liability for the use of the right -of -way or any.
delay in emergency vehicles finding the house.
2. That the City is not responsible for maintaining the drive.
Alternative 2. Public Street
If the City built a public street, we would only be able to assess about 25% of the costs.
The City would have to pay the rest. Building a street would not be cost - effective for
one house. Buying the Lukin's lot may be cheaper than building the street.
Alternative 3. Deny Access
If the Council chooses this option, they should consult with the City Attorney to see if
he could defend the City against legal action. The owner may sue us for inverse
condemnation.
Alternative 4. Buy the property for open space
There . are four reasons to buy this site:
1. The City's land use plan shows this site for open space.
2. This site would be a natural open space extension of the Park
3. Buying the site for open space would eliminate the public safety concern of a house
that does not front on a maintained street.
4. The neighbors are requesting that the City keep this site as open space.
The City is planning this property for open space. (See the land use plan on page 12.)
Many of the neighbors stated they prefer to keep this property for open space and
wildlife habitat. In 1992, the Maplewood Open Space Committee rated this site 31 out
of 66 sites. The ratings also ranked this site 5th out of 12 sites in that neighborhood.
The Open Space Committee strongly recommended that the City buy nineteen
sites —fifteen of the top - ranked sites in the City and four sites ranked high in each of
four neighborhoods. The Committee did not include the Lukin's site in the top
nineteen. The City will have a $5 million bond. issue about buying open space on the
November ballot.
3
The site is adjacent to Hazelwood Park. However, the Director of Parks and Recreation
recommends that the City not acquire this parcel for park property. Because of the park
parking lot to the west, this property would not have much value to the park. If the
City purchased the Lukin's lots for a park, the City might use them for a picnic area.
There are four options for buying this site:
Option 1. Use general fund money.
Option 2. Use Park fund money.
Option 3. Order a public improvement project and assess the costs.
Option 4. Use open space money if the referendum passes.
Comments on Option 3: The wetland on this site is shown as a stormwater holding
pond on the City's drainage plan. (See the drawing on page 14.) Eventually, the City
should consider acquiring the wetland and build the connecting storm water pipes. The
City could require that the Lukins dedicate a drainage easement over the wetland as a
condition of building a home. If the Council chooses option 3, they should also acquire
the pond that is south of County Road C.
If the Council decides to consider buying the Lukin's lots for open space, the Council
should table the request for a house until the City has determined whether to buy the
site. The Council should choose one of the four options above to buy the site. If the
Council chooses Options 1 or 2, they should order an appraisal of the property. If the
Council chooses Option 3, they should order a feasibility study. If the Council chooses
Option 4, they should wait to see if the referendum passes.
Conclusion
The City should let the Lukins build one house with conditions to insure that no more
houses will be built on these three lots. The Eakins should give the City easements for
the wetland. This would insure that the majority of the site stays as open space with no
cost to the City or assessments to the neighbors. The City should vacate Flandrau
Street, require that the Lukins deed the 33- foot -wide strip next to 1697 County Road C
to that owner and deed future development rights for the lots to the City. This would
insure that there would be no future homes built on these three lots.
The Eakins are opposed to these conditions. Their opposition creates some doubts as to
their future intentions for additional homes on the property. The City had a similar
situation in 1992 when Marlo Priebe asked to build two houses on seven lots that did
not front on a public street. (See the history on pages 8 and 9.) There was a wetland
on this property. The City required that he deed further development rights to the City,
give the City a drainage easement for the wetland and pay a cash connection charge.
These are the conditions that the Lukins are objecting to on their property.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the resolution on page 21. This resolution approves an agreement to construct
one house on a lot that does not front on a paved street. The City approves this
agreement because:
1. This situation is unusual.
2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions.
3. The drive and one house would not alter the neighborhood's character.
40 The City has approved other homes on private drives.
This resolution requires that the property owners or the Lukins do the following
before the City issues a building permit:
1. Record agreements against the property that:
a. Hold the City harmless from any liability for the use of the right -of -way or
any delay in emergency vehicles finding the house.
b. State that the owner of the Lukin's property is responsible for
maintaining the drive.
C. State that the City may change this agreement if the City approves
another house on this driveway.
The City Attorney shall draft these agreements.
2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the
proposed house and driveway. The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control
Handbook. The driveway must be an all-weather surface that is at least twelve
feet wide. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City Engineer
and the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must follow this plan.
3. All construction shall follow the site plan the City stamped July 14, 1993. The
Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
4. Combine the three properties into one tax parcel.
5. Record a deed to the City that prohibits any additional houses on these lots.
6. Deed the 33- foot -wide strip on the east side of 1697 County Road C to that
property owner. If the property owner will not accept the property, deed it to
the City.
5
7. Install a sign at County Road C and the driveway that states the property
address and that the drive is private.
8. Record a drainage easement to the City that covers the wetland and the land
that is ten feet beyond the wetland. This easement shall prohibit mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the wetland. The Lukins shall not
record this easement until the City Engineer approves it. The wetland's
boundary shall be as defined by the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed
Board.
9. Pay the City $7,000 for cash connection charges to connect the house to the
City sewer and water.
10. Have the location of the building staked by a registered land surveyor.
6
CITIZEN COMMENTS
The City sent surveys to thirteen property owners near the site. We received ten replies.
Two were for the proposal and eight were against.
Those for the proposal had the following comments:
1. I want to see the entire 5.25 acres tied into one lot. Also, abandon Flandrau Street
and begin maintaining the entire parcel of land. (Sigmundik - 1697 County Road
C)
Those against the proposal had the following comments:
1. This will be only the first of more problems with the proposal. It is the buyers
problem for purchasing problem property. (Overson - 2647 Gem Street)
2. There is other property to build on in Maplewood better suited for housing. Sell to
the City and extend the park -leave as is for wildlife -after the owner cleans it up.
The former owner has buried all types of machinery and junk in that property
which has probably polluted the water table in this area. (Kringle - 2655 Gem
Street)
3. Could be higher taxes and I like it the way it is now. (Meissner - 2675 Gem Street)
4. It directly adjoins my property and I foresee a number of houses on that 5+ acres.
I see a loss of wildlife, deer, ducks, geese etc. plus a road which would destroy the
present wetlands. I think it would be a bad mistake. Donate or sell it to the village
for a wildlife sanctuary. (Bennett - 2687 Gem Street)
S. The land should be used as a wildlife refuge - If it is developed, let it be single
family homes. (Martin - 2691 Gem Street)
6. See the letters on pages 16 -20.
7
REFERENCE
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: A 2.6 -acre parcel owned by M & M Financial Company in St. Paul
Westerly: The undeveloped Kennard Street right -of -way and Hazelwood Park
Southerly: Four single - dwellings
Easterly: Single- dwellings
SURVEY of OTHER cmEs
In 1992, the City staff surveyed twenty suburban cities to see if they allow homes that
front only on private driveways. Only four allow such lots. These four cities require City
Council approval for such a request.
HISTORY
Other Similar Requests (buildings not on an improved public street)
April 20, 1978: The City Council approved a request for Lorrie Heinzen to construct a
house at 2554 Idaho Avenue. Ms. Heinzen's lot did not front on a paved street. The
Council approved the request, subject to the owner paving a driveway to the existing
street.
May 18, 1978: The City Council approved a request of James Sobota . to construct a
storage building east of 2054 English Street. This building is on property that does not
front on a paved street. This approval was subject to two conditions --the City Engineer
approving the driveway design and the applicant recording a maintenance agreement
for the driveway.
May 1, 1980: The City Council approved a request from Keith Libby to build three
homes on a parcel that does not front on a public street. The site is on Century Avenue,
south of I -494. The only access to this parcel is a 30 -foot right -of -way from Century
Avenue. This approval was subject to Mx Libby installing a paved driveway on the
right -of -way to the City Engineer's specifications. The City also required the applicant
to sign an agreement to maintain the drive to City standards, including snow plowing.
July 13, 1992: The City Council approved three requests for Radmila Popov for the
Pilerich property at 860 Burke Court. Burke Court is a private driveway. These requests
allowed Ms. Popov to divide the property at 860 Burke Court into three lots. This
approval also allows a total of five lots that do not front on an improved public street.
November 23, 1992: The City Council approved a construction agreement and street
vacations for Marlow Priebe. This agreement allowed the properly owner to build two
8
houses on a private driveway. This property is south of the Eldridge Avenue right -of-
way and west of Birmingham Street. These two houses are on lots that do not front on
an improved public street.
July 26, 1993: The City Council approved a construction agreement and an increased
front setback for the Korfs. This agreement allowed them to build a house with a
private driveway on a land - locked property on South Sterling Street.
UTILITIES
There is City sewer and water in County Road C.
go/b- 5:memo54d.mem (3)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Map
3. Property Line /Zoning Map
4. Site Survey and Grading Plan
5. City Storm Water Plan
6. Letter: Lukins
7. Letter: Meyers
8. Letter: Hoppe
9. Letter: Corbett
10. Resolution: Construction Agreement
11. Resolution: Vacation of Flandrau Street
12. Site Survey (Separate Attachment)
9
Attachment 1 @ • �(a' -
• •• 00 *• lb. so: V ♦ 4• # 0• •
NZY
s. wo wr" •
AL
we
00-
• U 0 • %%** • 0 • to 0 • A - as • so I's
COUNTY ROAD
RD. D
Ce
BEAM
6 tg
KOHLMM AVE.
ROAD C 3 tg
�l �
lu
Nrub
AVE
GIERVAIS AVE.
COPE
CTT. las
WC
Ce
BEAM
6 tg
KOHLMM AVE.
ROAD C 3 tg
�l �
lu
Nrub
AVE
GIERVAIS AVE.
COPE
CTT. las
LOCAT MAP
4
10
19 Ezi
i
—LYDIA
a
or--
0 u
Q
BC �M
�
�
o
�
G
��S
o
tj
AVF.
BEAM
00
Q9
�
19 �t
c
�
0
R"TZ IL
aE
r /AV 69
P**d
RAMSEY Co.
•ti.
COUNTY � 06
�
COURT'
'`
�
G
� KOHLMAN
X
o
ASE. �' LO
See
RD.
ac
EDGEHILL
DEWOUT
AVE
��
ROOKS
AVE tiBROOKS
CD
d
AVE.
EL
see
SEX
TANT z
A V
S F~
PW*
A
GEWAIS
GERV AJS GERVAIS AVE.
s*
so
0
CRANDMEW
AVE
CT.
00
0
VD(M
CAS-n.E AVE
-
SHERREN AVE
Kn L ola
Oft
A
AVE-
COPE a 6 .
LOCAT MAP
4
10
Attachment 2
C) oza
w o
s VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD
3 � '
C ,3}
O - li. 745• V8 - , ' -
+- 1.7 3
1• itl F41: 910
N °'�'► Ct 210 ;
d - I .Z' , L - - -
- -- b-1 F Zt ,
. I
l ii
�tx 3.65aa • � ;�
i
4-Has-
VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD PONDIN$ AREA ^ i 1
Dec 19113669 / It
h - (7) 1 r I p
N f'
OPEN SPACE RAM!
td�1 22 0 1 � , C N
Q
� 82 Rpli
1 ►
�� t szl!
_ 13 17.7I' l _Z 51 .7/ =R - - -�?� -- - - � - - - - _ � °c
9 sao 55 (20,904c) ,,; v,
T - 22 - VALE
3.33 r. > ' - -
01243 ,. 0 66
W. 1 83
0 , 4.04 ac. r +11 3 71 '« + V
24 O I
0 2 7 4050
!.1 T
O
.47ac.'
L ° ° Now . s' 2 ' E 2733 at .
s g 3 9.8(odc. �'� `� v 2728:
s Gam. I. CITY —OWNED PROPERTY 47 , �
ro�s�o 0 W in
2723 Z a L : 2720.
Z ( +843' ) 31 +613
sl5ac
C8) to ° � . s � d
HAZELWOOD PARK 2 . (00 ac 0 271E
2711
v '^ (4-3) ) N '`
2699 ■� 7 2714
Z 5Z5 C 6 33)
I
c
5C 2691 �0 o2696
Z. b o de, .sba�. 4 ti
A .
(¢z) � 2688 -
2682 , 4G ac O 0 •} E
7 _ - Q
0 94 d&
t
2687
z o -9 3' a
K' GO 26 78 PROPOSED HOUSE LOCATION 1 . ! ,0% Pic SITE 03 46 - � '
♦ - N� 4 - o 2680
(+ C41� � 2 67 � i 3 6 � /i 1
26 ♦ d s�
Q +z i ` �7at. �1) o o
�� ""'- . 1. l5dc• 120 0 2664
— 2660 Z 9 3'
t I £ 2655 O �90414A-
�'
ll 47.13 � s 11 , , �•. 1675 r �, _� 0 00 1741 o /
UO) ' W �� � 1(1 V 0� r 1697 13!) _ n L <i
ti
co Q co s zvM 2647 0 i
cc
1"'
LO
O 20
TM
1r � ��+
nLu4 i ' " 70 A.75' 103' + 1.00' * 100' 1 - 121` r 2 11 (
s .31 . '
COUNTY ROAD C �-- --
n
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
N
11
Attachment 3'
interchange
iprinci arterial 694
interchange
Vadnais Heights OS R - B C i 'm a' o
600 AID 0 -ANOM
t
I
■ Co. Rd. D �, .S9Ii�.�tor
M 1 L ■ .•, .K
r-
■ BC `
m
`. major collector • ' -,
' 0 ■ .. mulmal"WE 110
BC
,
► ,
+
riai ■
BC ( L TC:((M) -' R 2 B R
i LBC
3 - M. R -3(m) — -
s - -- -
- 11 3( m
0.
o - -- jaw
3
*Mow
— R 1
_ C _ C wi
j or c Iecttt - - _ Il t r
M Jaw
'L4
w
R e •'
\ O A .J _
US
0 S
I
LB
• R -.3 (H)
CO -p BC
p �t■�■� s s at■
10
major collector LBC = . — c
L I moo A-
_ t -♦ C
M _ _ - j
- ^ mat3 rtatial --r- Highway 36 ..
_. 1 • ,�� in ejtcha ge
_ C
P = PARK OS = OPEN SPACE R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS C = CHURCH
W m
r _
LAND USE MAP
r x SITE
12
4
N
Attachment 4.
v�a�aT1r W� t .....
*s_ OWuAPHIC BOUNDARY
t SURVEY OF
MR. &IRS. STEW L" PROPF'M
LOCATED IN SE 1/4 SE IA SECTION 4
PROPERTY LINE TOyyll , " NORTH, RMGE 22 WMT
an OF MAPLEWOOD RMSEY COWM.
MMESOTA or
1. Er RCS M
WETLAND EDGE.•� --�-� """""
i
t
• ' s �'� AREA OF WETLA
FILLING
��t for W :.;,_:;_;: :: ;:::; s : : ._ ;:•
i � I Co Lu
•:_:::�.
p f =• AREA OF WETLAN
0 .
0 0 MITIGATION
E WETLAND ED
G
0
W
N • PROPERTY LINE
' o
COL.
oc �
m._
d b
z
UWA �...
EXISTING
BARRICADE
a
• a w
KEMPER ASSOCIATES INC.
,�■� _ .___ _ -- tom' -� -�-ri - � � ' +��
CERTIF ICATE OF SURVEY
Attachment 5
rd
H
W
W
O
O
O
3
W ''
N
Z
H
V)
•
W
N
Q
N,: - - ' I", "
(( rrr�rir
I N)- -
•
r
!
r'
t !
r
!
mmmovw�
MAPLEWOOD DRAINAGE PLAN
E3 LUKIN SITE
14
11
�I
1 �
BEAM AVENUE �--- - - - -L_ �
_ T !7
Cccrrr Q)
I ,
l
N
W
1 r
4
N
Attachment 6
JUN 2 5 3
Mr. Ken Roberts
Associate ate Pl anner
City of Maplewood
June 25, 1993
Dear Mr. Roberts
We have purchased property east of Hazelwood Park and
are re permission to be construction of a sin
family dwellin This property does not currently have
access to an improved road, therefore, it is necessary for a
driveway to be constucted off County Road C usin the un-
improved Kennard Street ri away.
We have enclosed a topo and boundry survey of
the property to readily expedite the process. We have been
residents of Maplewood our whole lives and look forward to
buildin our second home here. Our current home has been
sold and we will need to move into rental property with our
three children until the completion of our new home. We
will be movin from our present home Au 1st and it is
our sincere hope to once a work with the city of Maple-
wood .
Sinc rely,
Steve and Kathy Luk in
2602 Hazelwood
Maplewood, MN 55109
770-6959
15
Attachment 7
old
010
000
� .au• �..� -.� • ,dam
Alow.
AV
lisp—
CP
wool
2T �J�
Attachment 8.
July 11, 1993
1675 East County Road C
Maplewood, MN 55109 -1117
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Roberts,
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the proposal by Steve and Kathy Lukin to
build a home behind my property (1675) and that of my next door neighbor at 1667.
I have lived at 1675 East County Road C for twenty -two years, and have seen much
change come to the .area. My first choice for the property would be to have the city
purchase it as an "natural state" wildlife and wetland addition to Hazelwood Park
There has been a great deal of development in the area in the past two decades, and
open space is becoming a premium. This area is a rich and rare animal and plant
habitat. Red fix, deer, rabbits, raccoons, squirrels, pheasants, Canada geese, mallards
and a host of other birds are but a few of inhabitants, along with an abundance of
wildflowers and plants.
I object to this proposal because I do not have enough information about the plans for
developing the property. On a personal level, I will lase some highly valued privacy
should this home be built. Beyond that, however, I have a number of specific concerns:
1. I would object to paying or having my present neighbors pay any costs associated
with the development of this property, since there would be no benefit at all to us
should this proposal be approved. This includes costs to build an access road, bring in
water, sewer and other utilities and anything else involved in the project.
2. I feel the proposal should include a contingency that treats the entire 525 acres as a
single home building site. In other words, the owners would only be able to build one
single family dwelling on the 525 acres and not be allowed to subdivide the property
for other building sites.
3. Much of the property involved in the 5.25 acre site is low and marshy, often with
standing water. In winter, kids ice skate on the little ponds. In my understanding this
area may fall within the protective guidelines of the state wetlands preservation
laws. That would certainly influence the type of development that could take place.
Does the city know the implications of wetland preservation law as it might influence
development on this property?
Wetlands are among our most valuable resources against flooding among other
things. Markham Pond is already a holding area for the city. Hazelwood Park and its
17
soccer fields are already saturated this year. What impact might development to the
east of the park have on the area?
4. The area .directly behind my house is low and has often has standing water. If it is
filled. in, I will have massive water. drainage problems. I have had a lot of problems
with water flow changed by human hands, and I need to do whatever I can to protect
my property. When I first moved into the area, there was afour -plex under
construction to my east 0 681) and an empty lot to the west. While the lot on the west
was low enough to hold water runoff on its own, all three lots drained naturally to the
north (the 5.25 acres identified in this proposal ). The owner of the four -plex built up
the back yard of his property to a height. of about four feet above my yard and made a
bank running down and onto my property. I planted trees and grass seed to slow runoff
from his yard, but still I get it. Then the same property owner built a home on the west
side of my lot. That yard was built up to a height of about five feet above my yard.
Many mudslides later, a retaining wall was built to hold the fill, but this means both
the back yards to the east and to the west of me are much higher than mine. If the lot
to the back of mine is also raised, there will be no place for water to drain out of my
back yard, and I will have a mudhole.
5. If an access road is needed to this property, I think it should come through the
established easement for Flandrau street rather than run a driveway off Co. Rd. C and
along the parking lot for Hazelwood Park. I envision a lot of confused drivers
thinking the driveway is another access to the park or acut- through between Co. Rd. C
and Beam Avenue.
If you have any questions, please call me at 642 -5360 (office) or 777 -6200 (home).
Sincerely,
a 'ce M. Hoppe
- 2rtG/iteao �rn2z� l X 79, �� aoce�
18
1667 East County Road C
Maplewood, MN 55109
July 13, 1993
Dear Mr. Roberts:
Attachment 9
JL 1
We own the property at 1667 East County Road C, Maplewood, and wish to respond to
the neighborhood survey received from your office regarding the proposed develop-
ment of the 5.25 acres to our north by the Lukins.
At this time, we do not have all the facts, and we are opposed to any development of
the property for the following reasons:
1. Any development, to include a single family residence, will destroy or substan-
tially impair the area as a natural habitat and wetland. In our opinion, the entire
acreage should oe purchased by the city. of Maplewood inorder to preserve its natural
state, and it should be added to Hazelwood Park.
2. Currently, water runoff often covers portions of the paved trail in the park, near
the northwest corner of the proposed development. The lower soccer field is also
occasionally under water. Any home, garage, road, driveway, pavement, etc. will only
compound existing water flow problems in the park. In the long run, the city may
Y
well save money by purchasing the acreage and enhancing the park, rather than
spending funds on piece -meal drainage or gradin g projects which are certain to be
exacerbated by the development of this property.
3. What is the city's position regarding the property to the north of the proposed
acreage? We feel that this property should be added to the park as well. If it isn't
acquired by the city as park property, what development will be allowed, and will the
proposed Kennard Street entrance be used?
Were the proposed Kennard Street to be used as a road for even a single family
dwelling, it would place greater demands on the proposed 12 foot unimproved road.
P P
Ll Maplewood's snowy winters, would this require that the 12 foot road be ex-
panded and improved? Any development expansion or improvement would further
complicate water flow problems in the park.
4. Any road, improved or unimproved, on the proposed Kennard Street property
would substantially detract from the park, as well as close that area of the park to
future development, enroach upon the openness of the park, and create traffic
problems for those driving into the park. The proposed road would be less than 12
feet from the park entrance, and while this would be confusing to entrants, it would
also create a dangerous situation for our children, who are resentl 5, 4, and 2
P Y ears Y
of age.
19
[2J
Beyond the danger created by any appropriate use of the road, it is easy to imagine
that errant park entrants, upon realizing that they are not in the park, would be
annoyed and frustrated, and thus drive in a distracted and less- than -safe manner.
Additionally, a road so close to the park would be walked upon and across, much as
that area is now used by neighborhood children and adults, who believe that they. are
in the safety of the park and would not be on the lookout for traffic entering or exiting
there.
• development expenses, including roads, sewer, water,
We o to paying
for any develop P
5. J P
other utilities and any other associated expenses.
6. Our neighbor at 1675 East County Road C already experiences water flow and run-
off problems, even during normal rain years. Any development will likely add water
to her yard, and otherwise negatively impact upon the usage and value of her
property as well.
ersonall we stand to
�• Personally, y'
lose the
valued p rivacy
P Y
which initially led us to
our property. We
purchase o . p p y
also stand to
lose property
value.
Accordingly, we object to any development, and request that the city of Maplewood
purchase this property for the park system, and preserve its natural quality as a
wetland.
In the event that our objection and the objectio
only (1) e single family
the city, any authorization for development shou ld be for Y one
residence with all access including road and utilities to be through the Flandrau Street
entrance rather than the proposed area.
of Maplewood obtain the appropriate agency
e formally request that the city p .
y ' rt of the proposed determination as to whether all or pa acreage, including P P
or judicia 1 or p artially precluded
• acreage to the adjacent y p Y P
the other privately owned ac acent north, is fully g J
s�
io pu rsuant to state habitat or wetland preser-
from development pu .
• �,.� .� �z .- � � the above be obtained before any further
_-_ ii a�ute3. W also requz��� than ire . • .
at
• se contact us in writing regarding this issue.
consideration
of the proposal occurs. Plea
cons P
If you have any questions or concerns, please call us at 777 -0648.
Thank you for your consideration of this letter.
Sincerely,
Kathleen L. Corbett
f
i t64? 7
Robert E. Corbett
20
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Steven Lukin is asking that the City approve an agreement for the
construction of a single dwelling.
WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is:
The north 142 feet of the south 284 feet of the west 525 feet, subject to street, of the
SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22; and
The north 133 feet of the south 413 feet of the east 492 feet of the west 525 feet of
the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22; and
The north 215 feet of the south 628 feet of the east 525 feet of the west 558 feet of
the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, Section 9 -1 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires lots to front
on a publicly dedicated and maintained street.
WHEREAS, the above - described dwelling would not front apublicly- maintained
street.
WHEREAS, the history of this request is as follows:
1. The Planning Commission discussed this request on September 20, 1993. They
recommended that the City Council approve the request.
2. The City Council discussed this request on September 27, 1993. The Council
gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and
Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described agreement because:
1. Record agreements against the property that:
a. Hold the City harmless from any liability for the use of the right -of -way or
any delay in emergency vehicles finding the house.
b. State that the City is not responsible for maintaining the drive.
The City Attorney shall draft these agreements.
21
2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the
proposed house and driveway. The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control
Handbook. The driveway must be an all- weather surface that is at least twelve
feet wide. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City Engineer
and the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must follow this plan,
3. All construction shall follow the site plan the. City stamped July 14, 1993. The
Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
4. Combine the three properties into one tax parcel.
50 Deed to the City the right to build any additional houses on these lots.
6. Deed the 33- foot -wide strip on the east side of 1697 County Road C to that
property owner. If the property owner will not accept the property, deed it to
the City.
7. Install a sign at County Road C and the driveway that states the property
address and that the drive is private.
8. Record a drainage easement to the City that covers the wetland and the land
that is ten feet beyond the wetland. This easement shall prohibit mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the wetland. The Lukins shall not
record this easement until the City Engineer approves it. The wetland's
boundary shall be as defined by the Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed
Board,
9• Pay the City $7,000 for cash connection charges to connect the house to the
City sewer and water.
10. Have the location of the building staked by a registered land surveyor.
Adopted on
1993.
22
1 0-00
MAPLEWOOD PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING - SEPTEMBER 20, 1993
MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL
MINUTES
1)
Chair son Ewald called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
Present: Commissioners Ewald
Hawkins
Fischer
Christians
Qualley
\ Tolfson - Arrived at 7 :07 p.m.
Absent: Commissioners\Xhdawvn
ebiger
Guest: Geoff Olson, ire or of Community Development
2) APPROVAL.OF MINUTES
Commissioner F�- ischer MOVED to a rove
as submitted - second by Carvers A s:
3 ) APPROVAL OfF AGENDA
Director requested that Item
(KENNARD & COUNTY ROAD C) be moved to
Commissioner Fischer MOVED to approve
by Christianson; Ayes: All,
4) VISITORS - None
A11.
7A N - PROPERTY EAST OF HAZELWOOD PARK
fo ow Item 4 - VISITORS*
ha=ge second
7) UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A) PROPERTY EAST OF HAZELWOOD PARK (KENNARD & COUNTY ROAD CZ
Director Odegard reviewed the Park and Recreation Commission July
minutes in which this property was discussed.
Geoff Olson,. Director of Community Development, stated the property
is adjacent to Hazelwood Park and questioned whether the Commission
felt there would be any value in acquiring the land as an addition
to the park. He noted that the Open Space Committee had identified
this area as one of the Open Space sites in the city (ranked 31 out
of 66 sites).
Commissioner Tollef son arrived at this point in the meeting -7 :07 pm
Director Olson stated that the wetland on the east 2/3 of the proper -
ty is a stormwater holding pond on the City's Drainage Plan. The
City could require a dedication of a drainage easement over the wet-
land and land that is ten feet beyond the wetland as a condition of
building a home. The easement would prohibit mowing, cutting, fill-
ing or dumping within ten feet of the wetland. If the City acquired
the property as part of a public improvement project for stormwater
without a dedication, the property owners would be assessed.
A discussion followed regarding the placement of the driveway on the
Kennard Street right -of -way versus access through the entrance to the
Hazelwood Park parking lot.
Commissioner Fischer MOVED that at this point in time, the _Park and
Recreation Commission is not interested in purchasing this prop =y
east of Hazelwood Park. If the City feels that it is neces ary_ to
purchase it, that they use other funds outside of the Park Funds
second by Hawkins;
A discussion followed.
A friendly amendment to the motion was accepted. The Park and
Recreation Commission recruests that only one house be built on the
2roiDerty as recommended by Community Development
A vote on the motion as amended was taken.
Ayes: Commissioners Fischer, Hawkins, Qualley, Christianson, Carver,
Tollefson; Abstain: Ewald; Motion Passed.
Commissioner Fischer MOVED that in the event the City approves the
building of a home on the prooertvg the Park and Recreation Commis -
sion.recommends that the driveway be placed on the Kennard Street
right -of -way as indicated in the Community Development staff report
of Seutember12. 1993 second by Qualley* Ayes: Fischer, Qualley,
Hawkins, Christianson, Carver, Tollefson, Abstain: Ewald;
Motion Passed.
Plarming Commission
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
V. NEW BUSINESS
-2-
A. Conditional Use Permit: 2610 Highway 61 (Mitsubishi) (Section 9)
Ken Ro erts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Rick e was present
represen ' g the applicant and answered questions from the mmission. There were
no comme is from the public.
Commission artin moved the Planning Commission ecommend approval of the
resolution whit approves a conditional use permit t expand a maintenance garage
at 2610 High wa 61. This permit is based on the dings required by ordinance and
is subject to the f owing conditions:
1. All construction Xhall follow t /en that the City stamped August 4, 1993.
The Director of C mmunity Dmay approve minor changes.
2. The proposed cons coon muntially started within one year of
Council approval or th permiThe Council may grant up to one one-
year extension of the p 't.
3. The City Council shall revi�vv this permit in one year.
Comnussioner Pearson secoilded
Commissioner Rossbach eferred to commercial property study which is under
consideration by the P g Commis' n. Mr. Rossbach said he is opposed to
commercial propeJ'residential. ext to residential operty without a suitable buffer zone. He
feels that this proal will bring more c onto County Road C affecting the area
to the east which
The Commissio voted as follows: Ayes - -Alle ach, Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer,
Kittredge, M Pearson, Sigmundik
Nays -- Rossbach
The motion passed.
B. Kennard Street, North of County Road C (Eakins) : Construction Agreement, Street
Vacation— Flandrau Street (Section 3)
Commissioner Sigmundik removed himself from participation on the Planning
Commission for this item.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
Ken Robert, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and answered questions
from the Commission. The Commission discussed the P ossible means of access to the
property from County Road C, proposed filling of portions of the wetlands, and the
possible acquisition of this ro for ark or open ace land.
P P �y P P P
Steve Lukin, 1487 East Cope Avenue, the applicant, explained the proposal. Mr. Lukin
said he is not a developer and has no plans to become a developer. Mr. Lukin said he
is opposed to the recommended staff condition requiring him to record a deed
prohibiting any further development on this property, because it will diminish the
value of this property. Mr. Lukin said he also is opposed to giving the City a drainage
easement for the wetland and the ten feet of land beyond the wetland. He said he
finds the $7,000 sewer cash connection charge unacceptable. Mr. Lukin said he would
like to have a reassessment of this charge, taking into consideration the past
assessment actions of the City regarding this property.
Commissioner Kittridge asked the applicant if he would be willing to reconsider
recording a deed to prohibit further development to assure the adjacent property
owners that he does not intend to further develop this property. Mr. Lukin responded
that this deed would diminish the value of his property, but he would consider
negotiating an agreement with the City to purchase this property.
Bob Corbett, 1667 East County Road C, asked that the City consider purchasing this
property for open space and to avoid future problems with wetlands and drainage.
Mr. Corbett asked that the Commission table this item until after the open space
referendum.
Steve Hagen, 2699 Gem Street, said he has drainage problems on his property and he
is concerned about the impact of this proposal.
Nora Meyers, 2711 Gem Street, said she has drainage problems on her property and
she is concerned with additional drainage problems.
Marvin Sigmundik, 1697 East County Road C, explained the history of the drainage
problems in this area. Mr. Sigmundik said he feels the Eakins should record a deed
that prohibits further development on the property.
Janice Hoppe, 1675 East County Road C, said she is concerned about the drainage
problems.
Steve Lukin spoke regarding the slope conditions required as part of the Watershed
permit.
Vicky Kringle, 2655 Gem Street, asked that this item be tabled until after the open
space referendum.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
Commissioner Rossbach said this proposal would allow a house to be built in the
back yard of the homes on County Road C. Mr. Rossbach said this house would
infringe on the neighbors because of the small size of their adjacent lots.
George Rossbach, 1406 East County Road C, spoke regarding the history of Kennard
Street,
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves an agreement to construct one house
on a lot that does not front on a paved street. The City approves this agreement
because:
1. This situation is unusual.
2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions.
3. The drive and one house would not alter the neighborhood's character.
4. The City has approved other homes on private drives.
This resolution requires that the property owners do the following before the
City issues a building permit:
1. Record agreements against the property that:
a. Hold the City harmless from any liability for the use of the right -of -way
or any delay in emergency vehicles finding the house.
b. State that the owner of the Lukin's property is responsible for
maintaining the drive.
C. State that the City may change this agreement if the City approves
another house on this driveway.
The City Attorney shall draft these agreements.
2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the
proposed house and driveway. The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control
Handbook. The driveway must be an all- weather surface that is at least
twelve feet wide. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City
Engineer and the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must
follow this plan.
3. All construction shall follow the site plan the City stamped July 14, 1993.
The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
PI * 9 Commission -5-
Minutes of 9 -20 -93
4. Combine the three properties into one tax parcel.
5. Record a deed to the City that prohibits any additional houses on these lots.
6. Deed the 33- foot -wide strip on the east side of 1697 County Road C to that
property owner. If the property owner will not accept the property, deed it
to the City.
7. Install a sign at County Road C and the driveway that states the property
address and that the drive is private.
8. Record a drainage easement to the City that covers the wetland and the land
that is ten feet beyond the wetland. This easement shall prohibit mowing,
cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the wetland. The Lukins shall
not record this easement until the City Engineer approves it. The wetland's
boundary shall be as defined by the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed
Board.
9. Pay the City $7,000 for cash connection charges to connect the house to the
City sewer and water.
10. Have the location of the building staked by a registered land surveyor.
B. Adoption of the resolution which vacates Flandrau Street, north of County Road
C. The vacation is subject to retaining a drainage easement over the entire right -
of -way.
Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Axdahl,
Fischer, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach
Nays-- Kittridge
The motion passed.
Mr. Sigmundik resumed his position on the Commission.
��
AGENDA NO. 44ML
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE.
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager
Assistant City Manager �r*um�►,�i(C�'1
U
.Action by Council_al
Endors
Modifie
Rejecte
Date
ST. PAUL METRO TREATMENT CENTER (METHADONE CLINIC)
October 5, 1993
INTRODUCTION
At the September 27, 1993 meeting, the City Council directed staff to immediately
order and install NO PARKING signs on Prosperity Road from County Road B to
Fleming's service station. Parking will be prohibited during the Clinic's operating hours
of Monday - Friday, 6 a.m. - 3 p.m., and Saturday, 6 a.m. - 9 a.m. In addition, the
Council directed staff to meet with neighborhood representatives to discuss their
requests for additional signage and improvements. This report is a summary of the
meeting with the residents and other information which the Council requested.
BACKGROUND
Seven residents met with the Director of Public Works and the Assistant City Manager
on Wednesday, September 29, 11:30 a.m. The following items were discussed.
1. SLOW CHILDREN signs
Five signs were requested at the following locations:
North bound Prosperity north of County Road B;
North bound Kennard north of County Road B;
South bound Prosperity between Laurie and Lark;
South bound Flandrau south of Cope; and
North bound Flandrau between Sandhurst and Laurie.
The estimated cost for the five signs is $660.
2. STOP SIGNS
The residents requested that a four way stop be installed at the intersection of
Flandrau and Lark.
In addition, they have requested a STOP sign for eastbound Lark and northbound
Prosperity. This intersection is currently marked with an arrow marking the 90
degree turn. The estimated cost for the six signs is $810.
3. STOP AHEAD signs
Since the new STOP signs for the intersection of Prosperity and Lark are being
installed at a location which typically would not be signed, the City Engineer
suggested that STOP AHEAD signs be installed to warn drivers of the controlled
intersection ahead. The estimated cost for the two signs is $270. A map of the
neighborhood with the sign locations is attached.
4. NO U -TURN sign
The consensus of the group was to not post NO U -TURN signs on White Bear
Avenue. If this type of sign was installed, it would promote the traffic to use the
residential streets rather than White Bear Avenue. This type of sign would also
affect the other businesses along White Bear Avenue which are blocked by the
center median.
S. Additional street light
The group requested that an additional street light be installed at the intersection
of Prosperity and Lark. NSP installs the lights and maintains them. The City is
responsible for the utility costs. It should be noted that the City's street lighting
policy is to light for traffic safety rather than security.
6. Investigation of Abstract
At the September 27 meeting, Mr. Parson presented a copy of his abstract which
restricted him from creating a nuisance for surrounding residents. He questioned
if the owner of the Clinic's building had a similar clause in documents relating to
the commercial property. City Attorney Kelly visited Ramsey County to
investigate the title of the property at 2223 White Bear Ave. His report is
attached. Mr. Kelly located the residential neighborhood's restrictive and
protective covenants which excludes the commercial property to the east. Mr.
Kelly states that the City's zoning ordinance and other laws control the property
and the use of the property. The City enforces any violation of the City's
ordinances including the zoning laws. The Treatment Center has not violated
any City laws. If the Treatment Center is found to be covered by restrictive
covenants and a violation is questioned, it is the responsibility of other property
owners to enforce the covenants. This means that the property owners in the
neighborhood through the civil legal system would address the nuisance issue.
The City does not enforce restrictive covenants attached to the property.
7. Sign Code
During the meeting, one of the residents questioned why the Treatment Center
did not have a sign installed with the business name. City code does not require
a business to have a sign.
8. Fire Code
At the September 27 meeting, there was a question about the maximum
occupant capacity in the Treatment Center. According to the City Fire Marshal,
maximum occupancy loads are only inspected and required to be signed in space
that is classified as "assembly". The Treatment Center is not classified as
assembly. In addition, the Fire Marshal visits the site for fire code inspections as
part of the remodeling project.
7. Interim ordinance to regulate, restrict or prohibit the development of additional
clinic space within the City.
If a city is conducting a study, has authorized a study, or has scheduled a public
hearing to consider the amendment or adoption of a comprehensive plan or
official control, State law allows cities to adopt an interim ordinance applicable
to all or part of its jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting the study process
and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. This interim ordinance may
actually restrict or prohibit any use within the jurisdiction for a period not to
exceed one year from the date that the interim ordinance became effective. This
means that if the City Council officially declares its intent to study the restriction
of clinic locations through its zoning ordinance or the regulation of clinics
through a conditional use permit, the Council could adopt an interim ordinance
restricting clinics from expanding or taking occupancy while the study is
underway. No interim ordinance can impede a project which was given
preliminary approval before the effective date of the interim ordinance.
Therefore, an interim ordinance restricting the remodeling of space for clinic use
would not apply to the current methadone treatment clinic at 2223 White Bear
Avenue or any other clinic expansion that already has a building permit.
If the City Council wanted to adopt a moratorium for clinics, the City Attorney
emphasizes that the procedure set out by State law should be strictly followed.
The procedure involves giving notice for a scheduled public hearing to provide
people an opportunity to present testimony.
At the last Council meeting, staff was directed to investigate the zoning issues
related to restricting clinics to certain zones or requiring special permits or
licenses. This information will be presented to the City Council at the October
25 meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
This information is presented to the City Council for their review. If the Council directs
staff to order and install the signs, a transfer of funds (total $1,740) should be made
from the General Fund Contingency account to the appropriate Public Works
expenditure account.
Attachments
J
KENNARD ST.
FLAN
)RAU
i1 5 1
ST.
D
`ENT BY : 1 U - 4 - 93 4 : U 6PI BANK 16AN & KELLY 61 770 =15 C1 # '?
MEMO
To: City Manager
From: City Attorney
Date: October 4, 1993
Re,; ZQniv Crldr: 4 m . P"r1nrent /.:t (_ - trot orium
The issue of i nt e rim ot'di nances and rnor atorhi leave been raised and discussed in revious
l�
correspondence and mernoranda. our files indicate that materials
ls were sent t� ou under a
cover letter Novem 16, 1992,
Minn. Stat. §462.355, Subd. 4, does provide a city counci with the at,thorit Y P to adopt arj interim
ordinnance,. Such an inxerini ordinance may actually restrict ()r prohibi adl
x
jurigidiction for a p" L_xiod nui tv r,%.L�red uric ye"Lly f rom tile- <Jat� z1 fat . HIC loterfm ordinance bec ame
effective. However, such an interim ordirnance is only permissible "if a municip is condt)ctirt
studies or has authorized a study to be corlduC;ted M' ha held or has s cheduled a hear' ng for the
purpose of considering adoption or amendment of a compretternsive plan or official control ...'
Subd.. 2 of Minn, 5ta.t. §462.355 sets forth the procedure fo ��r��er�din the com re hensive plan.
g P P
That procedure should be strictly followed. In particular, the City should be careful to ensure
that at least one pu blic hearing is conducted as required b Statute. Furthermore the _ �. y e
requirement should be strictly complied with.
The question has been raised whether an interim ordinance /moratorium can be considered at
a special meeting of the City Council on October 4, 1993. Apparently, the topic of this interim
ordinance /moratorium w not posted as part of the n otice for this . special rn eetin
p g
This office would caution against using this 5peCi�L Meeting for such a P
ur ose. The �.'our'ts in
P
recent ye -ars have not looked favorably upon the overuse Of such moratoriums. As a result, it is
the recommendation of this office that there be very careful iMpleMent 16011 of such moratorium
and strict compliance with any notice previsions. It would be advisable that any discussion of an
interi ordinance/m orato.rtt,rn he schedtiled and placed on the a. Tenda for the next reg
� gu
meeting of the City Council.
Please contact this office imme diately wIti1 any additional gUeStiOIIS you may Dave.
MEMO
To: Gretchen Maglich
From: Patrick J. Kelly, City Attorney
Date: October 1, 1993
Re: City of Maplewood
. 3�\
E }
O CT 41 983
LJ
Please be advised that we have researched the property legal description of the subject clinic that
was discussed at last Monday's City Council Meeting. Please find herein the legal description
obtained from Ramsey County Tax Records (Exhibit A).
Pursuant to your instructions, we did preliminary research on the subject property without a
benefit of an Abstract. For purposes of reference, enclosed is Exhibit B which represents the
platted area. As part of our research, we contacted the Department of Taxation, the Abstract
Clerk, Abstract Records and Microfilm Division.
As a result of said research, we discovered Document No. 1489230 which refers to Restrictive
and Protective Covenants (Exhibit Q. Please review the legal description on the first page of
the Restrictive and Protective Covenants. The first determination is whether or not the subject
property is excluded from the covenants. Zoning would control the use of the property.
The property owners referred to Page 2, No. (7) "Nuisances which states:
"No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall
anything be done thereon which may become an annoyance or nuisance to the
neighborhood."
The state licensed the facility at a specific location and, the property owners would have to
overcome the argument that said activity was noxious and offensive. In addition, if the property
owners elected to enforce the covenants, their action would be through civil remedy based on
breach of the recorded document. Covenants particular to properties are the responsibility of
the respective property owners. The City is responsible for enforcement of its ordinances.
You should have engineering review the plat for a determination whether or not said property
is excluded from the covenants for purely assisting the property owners.
The City zoning codes ensure the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. If there is a violation
of said zoning laws, the City has the ability to immediately seek injunctive relief. The Planning
Department has advised that the clinic's use is within the accepted zoning criteria.
C: Michael McGuire
---------'-~-~------------
j�Askl
`
'
��
e
. •.
a 1.1 1 .4 a • 1 ESMr, 4
• . 30� OAD
�, tq w h DO
�. �C . 2 13
3.34 s s 1 (g� .t , 72!
I to. � 3)
40
-'e C �, � 0
1.18 Q :Y �,�•.
4 (8) o ;
sc
il C-4 -'
f 1� • E� iro
' t•, R` � 15 N r1 ti
S8 OA. #
a2
4t 3d (A.3f. 2 1. 3 •
•4•. aC� sett aK lirir 9�1 1 O n.l D« 47121 �✓•► /N p '1 f.
t .o -t't ati�T W1�t. 3 '7a9so
1• _t ; T
jo C�NptMNtai P 331 g (o • �,
Y • d A • ���� • • • �� d 00.60 moo a- a O Ow MOP • 0- ' We, d _ • _ d y .t _ _ Z. w • r -- _ -.r • A _ • _ _ _ w _ ._ _ w ••. w. m COW
.1 y __ --
a
j
New ---
�. �. .• 7S •s�1 CpNDOMaN K � p A
oc 1 1 of N NO ? `, � � r �
c u.
O •r 3
i 1 S •45 N •�� �°� 3 � ,o •.
col (39) ��$) (37) S
LOO' 1� f
$ �3 _ "' y - --I b
1w IV 1A
4r (50)
2 r
70 (13"
%J (44) %-0 (10) log
�Q• `a [ •V •,s' ,s' �s' �S' �s'
?•- • •• •, „ •. N 7s 77.E •
O
• 0d' F AS 0' 04' O4' •4• 4• loo• f.
•* A �
- (5$) � �) � (5S-) l5+l (5-3) (52) = �1} • (zi t YA1 (19) (13) 01
•
•- - 1 !
_ a•:s
5 • ,
23) (24 ; 2 t% gyp) (G1� .� o ��} ( 1 ��� (zr, (27 ; o 4
(G20
C4 I -A acs s�• �8 -1• s(. 0
o a
1 \\
VAC Doc 01
goo•
_ 100 /o ? '2 75' hr' 4c too s 1070 1
�
° 7s• �• • 3 ►� •-
w • t
ti (72) (7J� (70) d lZZ oi3 ( (29� o
{ ?3 ) _
s o 160 ` " - - o f . G t a� � •
- a (O ( z_ <
Q '
t. ••- •� - - -- - - - -- - - - - - j- - - - V 0
G WOO
I t. z
I ;A (78 Q t
� 1 'd' n 2 � a _- 0 h Z 30)
OV (7G n (7
. a L • y it
0 3.
100* 10
•
0 VA G Dom. 14b2� a t
r j 1 ! . 6 ' 112 . fr " . {p .�-i� •� 76* 74, 15 7 0.1 f ' 3a
♦ 603.36'
(fig•) / S3� (8 f ( %
C. r arc C O N o n
ISO. /•
i
140 at
( U Aw
90% Oft
.2 4 Al
... A
M tio O2Z
2
4b Sal
1 , - .1 t - 175 'j W 79 49
• s
1349 .0 f
fo•5 4O
7 1t
.i• 8�1• L/•
Revised 2/88
GERS ADDIT
i
�•. , \;r. �.� .. .. ,�. ..... ... .. �. ... [ :..�.rr.) - ....:�... "! ., ^_ l \�; ...ir... -.,f 4. _. .._ 'LS %f'A`�. _. _. -ysy .- �y�kZ�^ __ �
� L
� 3
1t .ST RIC: ANN D laR0"1 " ' COVE hA' , : i S
KP:OW AL.t. MEN II TH&'3r'w_'1 F'RESEr- TS, vent ui: rltiawi riorno- !�,, inc. ;c 1'.i�r�rl= •9e�t:�
orporat.(;r no its principaI pIac of 503 ` trtltan Bit' Iditig, St.
Real! 1, 0t3, pri -setntty, the ownevl. of all Cir lots a nd parre-Is of 1,a7 vi, he- eby
ir:lpf s-'s upon the follo%k ;, cleserit)ed. p7c)perty, 9ituatt -d i(i Ramsey County, Minne-
sot:i, to-wit
C) t:C)t,s 0 T (1) .gri t %vo (2), Block fy\•(- (5); Lots one (1) and twi (2), Bl1 )10k
twelvC (I PxCePt f.hat w): titan of said Lot two (2), Blm. -K twel (l ?)
1 Soiktheelster.ly J thf• c-rt:t(-r li of Prosperity Avetme; Lots Mie
(1) and two (2), •loc. };. twrntv_ (21 ), exc ept t }t portion of :•pa l,ot.5
...ne (1) and two (2) Block (21) lying, ,' outhf-asterly of t he
renter li ric• of Prosperity A%icnuc and a so e:;c ept that po rtion i yr. _ p
Northv4 -e� ;t of the- rent( -r line of Prosperity A \•r>>ue and iving S•�utl; :yr�st
of a line des: . as follows: Begiznning at a point on the North livC
of said Lot 1 distant 190 felt East cJ the Nort' corner thereof,
thence rumning South (part l`! el to the Wef:t line of said Lot l ), 55 feet;
thence S. 47 E. to an inter!crlctiori Nvith said cf:nt►�: live: and lying
Easterly of at tine described as follows: Beginning, at a poi r�.t on seeA
North line distant 150 feet East of said Northwest corner, hence :
South (parallet to said west line) to the center line of said vacated alley:
thence S. 39 E. to an intcsr. section with sa-id center line of Pr- asperity
Avenue; &u Frospoe Aven all iri Smith anri Taylor's addition
to No ,"th fit, Patti atco�rding to the re,, orded plat thereof.
the foilowi.ng CreventAnts and, restrictions wb ch shall run with the land a.nd 1)e binding
capon and inure t the benefits of the p&crti ea ne reto, their heirs, r-xr!cutor s ; ar.imI F1
fs trato r s, succ and etr s ign t ,
PART A: AREA OF APP LICATION:
. .M.+.r.1.i .d..MA....w ■r.�i...rr.r.r .•.ra
The residential a rea vovena.nts arid'. rfstrictions in Part E in their entirfity
shall apply to the entire development describe above.
..•
PART B: RESIDENTIAL AREA COVENANTS AND RE;iTRtCTIONS
(1) La.nd-Use and Building Type: No lot shall be ust_d except for residential
1
r rJ
purposes. No building shall be er- %ct1d, altered, placed. or pei ; to re:n -lain
on any lot rather than one detached single- f amily dwelling not to exceed tvvo stories
i n hei
r <
�,..
v.
(2) Architectura Control: No building Rhall be erecter!, placed or alt :gyred
on any lot un til the c puns and .speci and a plan; showing the
C.
location of the structure have beet approved by the architec tur:ll control committee
.,
as to gttality of - Tvorkmanship . and materialo, harmony of exter•tia1 design with existing
structures, alid as to location with respect to topogra and finish grade elevation,
Approvaa shall be as prob in Part C.
�
(3) D welUng Cost, QU&1ijX Abd Size: No dwelling sba.11 be p ernnitted on any
�.
lc.t at a cost of less than X10, 000.00 based upon. cost levels on the date-
these. covenants are recorded, it being the intentinri and pe case of the covenant
assura! ?:hat all dvwcol.lings shalt be of a quality of , workmanship and . mater.a.ls sub-
a,
s the- sane or better than that �,- h ( be produced on the d ate these
covenants are recorded at t! .ca minitmirn cost statecl herein for the minirnurn pier -
rnitt,ed dwelli.f- size. The ground floor area of the main structure, exclusive of
one-story ol3en porches and garages. shall -bo^ riot less than 960 squire feet for a
one-story c1u,-c•Iling, nor 1rRzs tf7a:l RI,S sq uarf , fei-r for a dw e liitiv of more than one
vtorv.
(4) Buildir -.E L cic•ation:_ No build, ing shall be located on anv lot nearer than
30 feet to front lot line, or nearer tFia>> 10 feet t(.) any side strc et line. No bui �dirlg
shall be located nearer than 5 feet to an itit:erior lot line, N o dwelling shall b.
located on any interior lot nearer than 5 fret to the rear lot line. For purposes of
this cove :cant, eaves, steps, and open porches shall not be cnsi:Jered as a part of
a buildinf;, provided, howe -ver, that this shall riot bir? construed to permit any po rtior
of a builcAng on a lot to encroach upon another lot.
(� ►) Lot Ar and Width No dwe lling shall be erected or placed on any lot
baving a width of 1ps s than 75 felt at the r -ninirnum bu ilrting se tback line nor shalt
any dwelling be erected or placed on ;itny lot having a -i area of lass Chin 10, 000
square r tset.
(tip
Easements: Easements for instatD.0tion ant- maintenance of utilities
are be- e':)y reserved as follows: In ez%rh of B.k?( i 5 ai;,l 12 of said property,
over a strip of land i4J feet in width r urining frorn the East boundary to the West
boundary of each of said blocks, and said .,trip of land tieing paralt l to, and
equ*distant from, the north and South boundaries of each of said blocks, subject
to Prasper,ty Avenue; and in ;aid Block ?1, over a strip of land 10 feet in width
running Eas terly from the West boundary of tiai d Block: 21 for a distance I of 150
feet, said. strip of tang being para.ltel to, P..ne equidistant from the North and. South
boundaries of said Block 21.
(7 ) Nu:sances No noxious or offenfOv activi shall be carried on u.pnn.
any lot, nor shall anything be done th�. which may become aui annoyance or
nuisance to the nei gtii�orhood.
(8) T*.mporar): Structures: No iitructure of it temporary character. trailer,
basement, tent, shack, garage, barn, or other outbu.ildling shall be used. on any lot
at any time as a residence either templt�kra.r -ly or permar!ently.
(1) Signs: No sign of any kind, shall be diaplayed to the public view ran an
lot exce one professional sign of not more tb,ar one square foot one sign of not
x
.�
OW .
r
i
_3_
rnory o -lian 5 square Feet ad".-ertisirig th (- property for stile or rent, or signs tisrd %when
L;uttchrig to ad,:ertise the. property during construction an sales period,
X10) t and k1ining OEr - ra ions No oil d r illing, oil developmcnt ope.ra.tion
c,:l rr•C:ciir1l), quarrying or minin operations of all kindshall be perndtte upon or
,ri .A -iv lot, ror 4qhall (61 welts, tanks, tunnelu, minin excava or shafts be pex
trig ttr tpon or in any lot. No derrick or other stru de-signed for use in boring
'4'r fjO or riatur«1 gas) shall be erected, rna'ntained or *)(!rrnitted upon any lot.
- estock and Poultry No anirnatF:, Uvegtock, or poultry of ar.y kind
:��t:�il t ?r• r:l�3t`d, ')r•:�d or kept on any lot,, e that dogs, eats or other househ(Ad
pets rMa ybe kept provided that they are not kept, bred or mainta for an corn
T ! - '4 Ir r% iat Pusposc.
l) Gd and Refuce DiQDOSaI No lot shall be >>sed or rn t as a
durnpin j: ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage or other watte shall not ne kept except
_~ ranttR.ry containers. All incinerators or other equipment for the storage or dis-
€a >r;al cil such matrhal shall. b ,:ept in a clean and sanitary condition.
i
!' Water Su p1Y into .ndividuai water- supply syster7� shall be per;nittPd
Ot Wn=,` la:i1css such system is locatc constructed and equipped in accordanr: e
with Ow re,.quirernetits and standards of th.e proper health authorities and shall be
i s.y b y t -
P A RT C: ARCHI T'EC'.TUR A i._, CONTROL C OMMITT EE
1. Mem bership: The Architectural Control Committee is cornpotsed of
Ohr persons, Rylz J. Rothschild, Edward C. Grout, and Kennon V. Rothchild,
Jr. , all of 1503 G• _iar Building, St. Paul 1, Minnesota, In event of death or
res oof an:- m ember of the committee, remaining members tai ►alt have full
a °.;thc %riiy, designate a successor. Neither the mernberFr of t. committee, nor
its de 'si gra.ted repre!lentative shall be entitteG to any compensation For services
pr.rfornned pi-rsua.nt to this cove nant. A, any time, the then record ownery of a
rna *ority of lots shaLIT have the power through a. duly reco instrument to. change
the ; t- mbersf - Op of the committee or t,) withdraw frorn committee or restore to it
any Ji Its poArers and duties.
2. Procedure: The committee's approval or disapproval as required in
these coven;xnts shall by in writing. In -vent committee, or its designated repre _
J
"low
.
•
s cntativ4! ,fa l is to approve or disa pprove within 30 da -
�9 after p►Inn3 and specifications
have been submitted to it, or in any event if no suit to enjoin construction has been
-4-
com: prio4 to completion thereof, approval will not be required and the re-
lated covenants shall be deemed to have be(-Ii fully complied with.
PART D: GENERAL PROVISIONS:
1. Term: Theme covenants are to run with the land and shall be bindi l g
on all. t)( and all persons claiming under them for a period of 25 years from
slate th - ese covenants are recorded, after which 611`1e said covenants shall be auto-
` ,
1
n extended for suc..cesaive;periods of 1.0 yearn unless an instrtiment si'gne'd
by majority of the them c" ►v of lots has beesi recorded, agreeing to change said
covenants in whole or in part,
2. Enforcement: Enfor. cerne shall be by nr ^cc cding at law or i equltv
against any person or persons violating or attemp"i - ting to violate any covenant"..
eithe`r to restrain violation or to recover damages. ,.
3. Severabilit ; Invalidation of an'"•rune of these covenants by judgment
,. .
or court order shall in no wise affect any of the othr provisicros which shall' t'e -
1
rra in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The owner has hereunto set hi s hand and seal
this 1r..
day of �, , �. _ A. D. , l 9_ S
y.
HIGHLAND HOMES, INC. .
In P Bence of:
Ong-. oft
r w/
i
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA
of
Its Treasurer
COUNTY OF
On. this .i =-�� day of 1059 before me a Notary Public
within and for said ounty, persona y�rappFare vIand J. Rothschild to me personally
known, who, being duly sworn by me did say that he is the Treasurer of the corporation
named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said inistrumetxt is the
corporate seal of said corporation, and that said instrument was signed, , seams in
behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and "
Rothschild acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed_rx�-a�� ct�xpor��tion.
-, �_4-ft
't..
N o to r y Public
�iy corm:7tission expires
►' O Y1'ub0c, R
Irk. C*MMftX#M Ex il. +nn,
. V-
0 S_
Highland Homes, Inc., by Treas.
a Minnesota Corporation,
81 owner
Restrictive and Protective Covenants
Dated Ju 23 1959
Filed July 23, 1959
Book Page
File #1489230
That Highland Homes, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation, presently he owner
of Land h y of all the lots and parcels
hereby imposes upon the following described ro '
Minnesota p perty, situated
in Ramsey County, to wit;
Lots 1 and 2, Block 5; mots 1 and 2 Block 12 .
said Lot 2, Block 12 1 A ' � except that p lon of
Y' �ng SE' ly of the center line of Prosp
Avenue; Lots 1 and 2, Block 21 except that p y
2. Block
91 lying P at portion of said Lots 1 and
y ng SE ly of the center line of Prosperity venue an
a lso exce t that Y �. d
P portion lying NW of the center line of Prosperit
Avenue and lying SW of a line described p y
as follows • Beginning at a
point on the N. line of said Lot l distant 190 feet E
thereof ; thence running of the NW corner
g S . (parallel to the W. line of said Lot 1 5
feet, thence S. 47 50' ) 5
E . to an intersection with said center line;
and lying E' ly of a line described as follows:
ws; Beginning at a paint on
said N. line distant 150 feet ' E . of said NW •
corner , thence running S.
(parallel to said W. line) to the center line of said vacated alley •
thence S. 39 20' E. to' an intersection L
with said center line of Pros-
perity Avenue; subject to Prosperity venu '
Y e, all in Smith and Taylor's
addition to
North St. Paul, according to the recorded lat t
the following covenants P hereof,
• g c and restrictions which shall run with the land
and be binding upon and inure to the benefi is of the parties .hereto,
their heirs
executors, administrators, successors and assigns,
PART A: AREA OF APPLICATION:
g
The residential area covenants and restrictions
ctions in Par ti$ in their
entirety shall apply to the entire development
---> PART B: described above,
RESIDENTIAL AL AREA COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS:
(1) Land - Use and Building Ty : No lot .
Yp shall be used except for rest-
dential
purposes. • No building shah, be erected, altered laced
permitted to remain on an lot other placed, or
Y than one detached single-family
dwelling not to exceed two stories in height.
(2) Architectural Control: No building �:� �, •
�h�.11 be erected, placed or
altered on any lot until the construction'
•
a plan showing p.�t ^ _ns and specifications and
g the location of the structure have been ap b
pP y the
architectural control committee as to quality of workmanship and
materials, harmony of external design with existing g t ng structures, and
as to location with respect to topography and finish grade elevation
A pproval shall be as provided in Part C.
(3) Dwellin Cost alit and Size •
y No dwelling shall be permitted
on any lot at a cost of less than $10,000.00 based upon
prevailing on the d p cost levels
g ate these covenants are recorded, it being he inten-
tion and purpose of the covenant t g
o assure that all dwellings shall be
of a quality of workmanship and materials substantially the same or
better than that which can be rodu ce d on the
p date these covenants are
recorded . at the minimum cost stated herein for the mini '
. ground � mum per
dwelling, size. The
g and f lo0r area of the main structure, exclusive
of one -story open porches and garages, shall be t
g � no less than 960
square feet for a one -story dwelling, nor less than 825 square feet for
a dwelling of more than one story,
q
(4) Building Location No building hall
g be located on any .lot
than 30 f nearer
fe et to front lot line, or nearer than 10 feet to an side
street line. No building hall b Y
g e located nearer than 5 f eet to an
interior lot line. No dwellin. shall be to •
g Gated on any interior lot
nearer than 5 feet to the rear lot line, For purposes of this coven
eaves, steps and open or P and
P porches shall not be considered as a part of a
building, provided, however, that this shall n •
of be construed to permit
any portion of a building on a lot to encroach upon another lot
(5) Lot Area and Width: No dwelling shall 1 be erected or placed on any
lot having a width of less than 75 feet at the minimum building g setback
line nor shall any ling be erected or placed on any lot having an
area of less than 10, o0o square feet.
(over)
4t l A
Doc. TTo . 1489230 (continued)
(6) Easements: Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities
are hereby reserved as follows: In each of Blocks 5 and 12 of said
property, over a strip of land 10 feet in width running from the East
boundary to the West boundary of each of said blocks, and said strip of
land being parallel to, and equidistant from, the N. and S. boundaries
of each of said blocks subject to Prosperity Avenue; and in said
Block 21, over a strip of land 10 feet in width running V ly from the
W. boundary of said Block 21 for a distance of 150 feet, said strip of
land being parallel to, and equidistant from the N. and S. boundaries
of said Block 21. {
(7) Nuisances No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on
upon any lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may become an
annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood,,
(8) Temporary Structures No structure of a temporary character,
trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn, or other outbuilding
shall be used on any lot at any time as a residence either temporarily
or permanently.
(9) Signs: No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view
on any lot except one professional sign of not more than one square foot,
one sign of not more than 5 square feet advertising the property for
sale or rent, or signs used when . building to advertise the property
during construction and sales period.
(l0) oil and Mining operations No oil drilling, oil development
operations. oil refining quarrying or mining operations of any kind
shall be permitted upon or in any lot, nor shall oil wells, tanks,
tunnels, mining excavations or shafts be permitted upon or in any lot.
No derrick or other structure designed for use in boring for oil or
natural gas shall be erected, maintained or permitted upon any lot.
(11) Livestock and Poultry No animals, livestock, or poultry of any
kind shall be raised, bred or Dept on any lot, except that dogs, cats
or other household pets may be kept provided that they are not kept,
bred or maintained for any commercial purpose.
(12) Garbage and Refuse Disposa %To lot shall be . used or maintained
as a dumping ground for rubbish. Tra...3h garbage or other waste shall
not be kept except in sanitary containe-a * All incinerators or other
equipment for the storage or disposal o such material shall be kept in
a clean and sanitary condition.
(13) Water Supply: No individual water - supply system shall be per -
mitted on any lot unless such system is located, constructed an
equipped in accordance with the requirements and standards of the proper
health authorities and shall be approved by them.
PART C: ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE
1. Members hi : The Architectural Control Committee is composed of three
persons, Ryland J. Rothschild, Edward C. Grout, and Kennon V. Rothschild,
Jr. ; all of 503 Guardian Building, St. Paul' 1, Minnesota. In event of
death or resignation of any member of the committee, remaining members
shall have full authority to designate a successor, Neither the members
of the committee, nor its designated representative shall be entitled to
any compensation for services performed pursuant to this covenant.
At any time, the then record owners of a majority of lots shall have the
power through -a duly recorded instrument to change the membership of the
committee or to withdraw from committee or restore to it any of its
powers and duties,
2. Procedure The committee's approval or disapproval as required in
these covenants shall be in writing . In event committee, or .its desig-
re
P
nated representative fails to approve or disapprove within 30 days
_
after plans and specifications have been submitted to it, or in any
event if no suit to enjoin construction has been commenced prior to
completion thereof, approval will not be required and the related
covenants shall be deemed to have been fully complied with.
PART D: GENERAL PROVISIONS
1 Term: These covenants are to run with the land and shall be
binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for a period
of 25 years from date these covenants are recorded, after which time
said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods
of 10 years unless an instrument signed by majority of the then owners
(over)
Doc. ,b . 14-89230 ( continuer)
of lots has been recorded, agreeing to change said covenants in
whole or in part.
2. Enf orcement : Enf or cement shall be by proceeding at law or in
equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to
violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover
damages, _
3. Severabil,ity Invalidation of any one of these covenants by
judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other
provisions which shall remain in full force and effect.
Highland Homes Inc. , Warranty Deed
(Minnesota corporation) Dated Nov. 13, 1964
82 -to- Filed Nov . 18 , 1964
Schuler Construction Book 1938 , Page 284
Corp. (Minnesota File #1634763
corporation) All that part of Lot 2, and of S . i
of vacated alley in Block 12, Smith
and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul lying Northwesterly and Westerly
of the center line of Prosperity Avenue; except the W. 375 feet thereof,
subject to Prosperity Avenue, and the E. 75 feet of the W. 375 feet of
Lot 2 and the S J of vacated alley in Blobk 5, Smith and Taylor's Addi-
tion to North St . Paul .
Free from all incumbrances except unpaid assessments.
Documentary Stamps $2.75, cancel led . Deed Transfer Tax $2.75 paid,
Articles of Incorporation Dated Oct. 30, 1959
83 -of- Filed Nov. 4, 1959
P. & R. Corpoaration Book 1655, Page 825
File #1497571
purposes: to buy, or any manor
whatsoever, acquire, mortgage, sell, lease, hold, manage and deal in,
to the foregoing and not in limitation thereof, in the same manor and
to the same extent as could a natural person, act with relation to,any
and all kinds of property, real personal or mixed, wherever situate,
Duration: Perpetual
State of Minnesota, Dept, Certificate
of State, Joseph L. Donovan Filed Nov. 4, 1959
Secretary of State Book 1655, Page 825
84 -to- File #1497571
The Public That the within instrument was filed
for record in this office on Oct.
30, 1959 in Book F-18, I nc orps .
Page 339.
Pe & R, Corporation,. Articles of Amendment of Articles
(Minnesota corporation) of Incorporation
by Pres . and Seely Dated Jan. 3, 1963
85 -to- Filed March 6, 1963
The Public Book 1834 , Page 975
File #1584779
That at a special meeting of the Shareholders of said corporation at the
corporate office in the City of St., Paul, County of Ramsey and State of
Minnesota , • .on Jan . 2, 1963. Pursuant to the written waiver and consent
of all the shareholders entered upon the record of the meeting, at which
mett ing all of the shares of the corporation then issued and outstanding
were present in person, the following resolution was adopted by the
unanimous vote of said issued and outstanding stock, to-wit: The name
of this corporation is Schuler Construction Corp .
Two 401
MEM
ORANDUM . ..
Act�.on bar Counc :
TO: City Manager Endorse
FRONT: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Modifie
SUBJECT: Truth -in- Housing Ordinance Amendment R e j e c t e d
DATE: August 19, 1993 Date 1em
INTRODUCTION
On May 24, 1993, the City Council requested that the staff review the truth -in- housing
ordinance. The Council wanted staff to include penalties for non-compliance.
Councilmember Juker requested this change after she heard of two violations of the
truth -in- housing ordinance. (See the Council minutes on P a g e 2.)
BACKGROUND
July 9, 1990: The City Council adopted the Maplewood Truth-in- rdinance.
g
This ordinance went into effect on January 1, 1991 and had a sunset clause that ended
the program on June 34, 1992.
June 8, 1992: The City Council readopted the truth -in- housing ordinance.
DISCUSSION
This ordinance amendment adds a new section about violations. This additional
language would clearly identify what could happen to a person if they do not have a
truth -in- housing evaluation done. The amendment also should help reinforce the need
and importance of the truth -in- housing ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached ordinance.
kr /memo88b.mem (5.1)
Attachments:
1. 5 -24 -93 Council minutes
2. Proposed Ordinance Amendment
3. 9 -14 -93 HRA Minutes
jti w ,,.�h _ rM xc.�' . ?. J .F.b I •E' •. f }. „�,. �.�.t y, �. ;1 . #�.' - 1. o ti •;ice •, Y• a.. C7f •, :•¢. d :S '� -'•, C: ``•..
ATTACHMENT 1
• I�'� � _, *•K -..• .��'. 4 �. • .� : w.. _ y : ;�. -. le. i.'. 1 r_ •X..+. -.. ���. . CL".+ ' s' _ r k • r•I f F i _vt: •ss, q_ ly'N` R����.�rN� �
'E
-
Truth-in-Sale-o Ordinance
a. Counci lmember
Juker stated she had he ard and of two recent
viofations
• he Truth - In- Sale- of - Housin •
inspecti g Ordinance, one �
which an ins
A n had not been prepared and a
the homeowner had re pother in which
p pared his own report.
b. Councilmember Juke •
• r owed to d r taf Lq v w ordinance wi th a view to inc ud c and re ort back to n .o - m
+: Cou ancg
Seconded b Counci
y ]member Zappa _ Aye all
1 1 _ .• •�, • � "- _ . •�
E •
f • •
6f
ATTACHMENT 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING A VIOLATION SECTION TO THE TRUTH -IN- HOUSING
ORDINANCE
THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE:
(I crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions.)
Section 1. This section adds Section 9 -243, Violations, by adding the following:
Section 9 -243. Violations.
Any - person , failing to meet and follow the provisions of this article shall be ggilty of a
misdemeanor and .shall be subject to prosecution_
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after publication.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 19930
kr /memo88b.mem (5.1)
01
HRA Minutes of 9 -14 -93 -3-
C. Truth -in- Housing Code Amendment
Ken Roberts presented the staff report and explained the wordage proposed to be
added to the truth -in- housing ordinance providing for penalties for violation of the
ordinance.
Commissioner Connelly moved to recommend approval of the ordinance adding a
violation section to the Truth -in- Housing ordinance.
Commissioner Whitcomb seconded Ayes- -all
8. DATEWF NEXT MEETING
a. October n, 1993
9. ADJOURNT
Meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m.
AGENDA NO.
-3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
k� on
FROM: Assistant City Ma
g
tY er
g
RE: REQUEST FOR CHARITABLE GAMBLING FUNDS
DATE: October 1, 1993
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council. e;
Endorsed�.
Modif
ecte
Date
This is the third quarter request for charitable gambling funds. Two requests have been
received; both are from the North St. Paul, Maplewood, Oakdale School District 622.
Harmony Community Education is requesting funds for the purchase of a Grason
Stadler GSI -38 Impedance Pure Tone Screening Instrument with a cost of $2,470.00.
The second request is from the North High School Multicultural Group, Shades of
Youth, for $400 to provide cultural diversity training about Asian culture.
BACKGROUND
Harmony Community Education provides the Early Childhood Screening Program in the
North St. Paul- Maplewood - Oakdale School District. The program identifies pre-
kindergarten children who have special learning needs which may interfere with
learning in school. The program includes testing for hearing, vision, and developmental
areas such as speech and social- emotional.
The instrument currently being used for hearing tests is not functioning properly. Two
hearing screening instruments are needed, because there are two teams who perform
the tests. The School District is funding the purchase of one new instrument. The
Early Childhood Family Education Coordinator is requesting that the City of Maplewood
contribute charitable gambling funds for the purchase of the second instrument. A
specific amount was not requested. However, the total cost is $2,470 and $300 has
already been contributed by another organization.
The second request is from North High School. A North High program called the
Shades of Youth are planning to hire the Mixed Blood Theatre of Minneapolis to
perform EASTERN PARADE: The Asian American Journey. It is a 45 minute
presentation for the 550 high school students to learn about Hmong and Cambodian
cultures and their transition to ,American culture. The cost of the performance is $400.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider the requests for charitable gambling
proceeds for 1) the purchase of a hean test instrument for I.S.D. 622's Early
Childhood Screening Program; 2) funding a cultural diversity training program for the
high school students.
School District
September 22, 1993
City of Maplewood
Mike McGuire
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mike McGuire:,
Maplewood
Oakdale
'.....
....... .. .. I
; -'J
t
j f+ j !
The Early Childhood Screening Program has been an important program for over 25 years
in the North St. Paul- Maplewood - Oakdale School District. The purpose of the program is to
identify children prior to starting kindergarten who have special learning needs which
may interfere with their success in school. The mandated components of the program
include. a hearing screening, a vision screening, and a developmental screening which
includes speech, motor, cognitive, and social - emotional assessment. This year the program,
with the help of many staff and volunteers, has screened 937 children between 3 and 5
years of age. In addition, we screened 56 children on September 2, 1993 so that they could
enter kindergarten this fall.
An important part of good results in the hearing screening is having reliable and accurate
equipment. This year, the volunteers that conducted the hearing screening have had
constant problems with the equipment not functioning properly or giving inaccurate
readings. This equipment has been borrowed from several of the schools and from the
Early Childhood Special Education Program. The Early Childhood Screening Program is in
desperate need of new equipment that is the property of the screening program.
Upon much investigation, we feel that the best choice of equipment is the Grason Stadler
GSI -38 Impedance /Pure Tone Screening Instrument which costs $2,470.00. This equipment
will give the program the versatility of doing both the screening and a re- screening if a
child's hearing does not meet the appropriate guidelines. We need to have two screening
instruments because two teams of volunteers conduct the screening two days each week.
We have requested the purchase of one screening instrument through the Capital Outlay
budget from the school district, which has been approved. We would like to request that the
City of Maplewood consider contributing to the purchase of the other instrument for the
Early Childhood Screening Program. We have received a, $300.00 contribution from one of
the many organizations that we have contacted.
We would be happy to answer any of your questions or to attend a meeting to discuss this
with you further.
S ely,
Judy Gammel, Coordinator
Early Childhood Family Education
Program
770 -4642
Neoma Jearig,Coordinator
Community Resource /Volunteer
Program
770 -4782
(612) 770 -4642
HARMONY COMMUNITY EDUCATION
1961 E. County Road C, Maplewood, MN 55109
� Ms
• r 5! Nf ��� y r � r
! l �� 1 t� kp i. P � .� �6T y
eS "NYt•F � '4Y `E� 1 v �1 � k
}��/,'y g 54 ..t .:.1�.....
J
Gt�.�M)
e t1
•'S q
:F
r
5 Y
a= �
Y µ�
. AUZ O
The GSI 38 Auto Tymp Version 3 is a combination
instrument providing testing capabil for a screening
middle -ear test battery along with screening audiometry.
The built -in display and printer make the GSI 38 a compact
unit requiring minimal table space. Its sleek, ergonomic
design enables it to be an attractive, easy -to -learn and
easy -to -use instrument.
Four different modes of operation are available:
tympanometry, tympanometry plus reflex (ipsiIateral and /or
contralateral), audiometry, and program. The versatil
of the GSI 38 Auto Tymp makes it an ideal product for
private practice, school screening programs, or clin
For tympanometry and reflex testing, the GSI 38 Auto
Tymp features a light - weight, handheld probe with three
LEDs to indicate test progress. The instrument display
during tympanometry will show the tympanogram tracing
and the test summary information which includes ear
tested, ear canal volume (ECV), the compliance peak
( the pressure at the peak of the tracing (daPa) and
the gradient (GR) in daPa.
The operator has the ability to customize the choice
of ipsi and /or contra reflex frequencies in the Tymp/Reflex
mode. The stimulus presentation sequence proceeds
from low to high frequency.
The GSI 38 Auto Tymp Version 3 contains a single
channel, manual, pure -tone audiometer with a choice of
up to 11 frequencies (125 -8000 Hz). The operator also
has a choice of three tone formats: steady, pulsed, or
FM (warble). Both right and left ear test results can appear
on the same audiogram or table during printout. A
patient handswitch is available as an optional accessory.
The program mode allows the operator to add the
facil name l and to customize the way in which the
GSI 38 displays and /or prints the individual test results.
A normal box per ASHA criteria can be displayed /printed
or not. Finally, the number of test frequencies available
during audiometry can be set to 11 (normal range) or 8
(narrow) depending upon your screening criteria.
The clear LCD screen keeps the operator continually
apprised of test mode, parameters, and results. A single
test can be printed or erased from one of the eight
memory locations or the entire group of tests in
memory can be printed or erased.
The GSI 38 Auto Tymp is available in four different
versions. This brochure describes the features available
with Version 3. See the accompanying documentation
for descriptions . of the other versions.
School District 622
North St. Pau
Maplewood
Oakdale
( r� IF3
2520 E. 12th Avenue, North St. Paul, MN 55109
September 29, 1993
Dear Ms. Maglisch:
This letter is in reference to the availability of charitable gambling funds from the City of
Maplewood. On behalf of the North High School Multicultural Group, Shades of Youth, we are
requesting your financial assistance in providing our students with the opportunity to experience
EASTERN PARADE: The Asian American Journey. This is a forty -five minute performance
presented by Mixed Blood Theatre of Minneapolis. Students will learn about Cambodian refugees,
the Hmong transition to American culture, and Southeast Asian myths as the performers blend
music, movement, narration and theater.
Our Multicultural Resource Center will also benefit since each of Mixed Blood's productions
include the following:
- a comprehensive study guide
- a video tape documentary
- a concise biographical summary with bibliography
- several 11 " by 17" posters
An individual performance by Mixed Blood Theatre costs $400. Our auditorium will hold
approximately 550 students and at less than a dollar per student, we would be able to provide a
excellent opportunity for our students to broaden their cultural experience .
Thank you for considering this request. We may be contacted at 770 -4650. We look forward to
hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Shades of Youth Ad 'stirs
ENNOPW
Marie T. ullivan
A
Dianne M. Sandberg
cc: Kathy Huyen
Mainlyn Vars
Randy Zipf
(612) 770 -4650 • FAX (612) 770 -4711
NORTH HIGH SCHOOL
AGENDA NO.
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager
Assistant City Manager I& J CA�
action by ouncil.sl
En dorsed
M odified., .--.
Rejected..
Date
COMMUNITY CENTER CHANGE ORDER: A&P NUMBER 1
October 1, 1993
INTRODUC17ION
Adolfson & Peterson is the prime contractor who is responsible for the general
construction of the Community Center. A &P is working very hard to get the
foundations in and covered before the frost arrives. This report is a change order
request for a maximum of $25,000 for A &P's grading contractor to bring in additional
fill for the building foundation.
BACKGROUND
During the grading and excavation under the second contract, it became evident that
the site contained less buildable soil than originally ht. This meant that there
thought.
would be less soil on site that could be used to back fill the foundation of the building.
To handle this possibility, the contract for general construction contained a section that
asked for unit prices for fill. Glenn Rehbein Excavating is A &P's grading subcontractor,
and they have estimated that additional fill up to $25,000 will be needed to adequately
cover the foundations.
This part of the construction is different from Steininger Construction's grading contract
for which $150,000 was authorized for fill. To date, Steinin g er has used $124,000 for
additional soils.
Both contracts planned for the situation in which additional fill would be needed.
There are sufficient funds in the budget to handle these changes. The funds are in the
contingency account. Both the construction manager and the architect are
recommending that the additional fill be imported as soon as possible to avoid any
problems that could arise due to an early frost.
The Change order Review Committee formally granted its approval for the change
order on September 30, 1993.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which authorizes
a change order for a maximum of $25,000 to Adolfson & Peterson's contract for fill to
brought onto the community center site.
tmc
RESOLUTION
DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered
the construction of a City -owned community center, Community Center Project, and has
let a contract with Adolfson & Peterson for general construction; and
WHEREAS, the soils engineer determined that there is not sufficient suitable soils
on site to safely and properly back fill the building foundation; and
WHEREAS, the contract with Adolfson & Peterson contains unit prices for the
import of clean fill (Unit Prices #4); and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and
designated as Community Center Project General Construction Change Order 1 to allow
the recommended import of soils.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in an amount
not to exceed $25,000.
The contract is amended not to exceed $5,212,000 per the following detail:
Original Contract $5,187,000
Change Order 1 Not to exceed 25
Amended Contract Not to exceed $512122000
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
.Action by CounO1
TO: City Manager
Endorse
FROM: City Engineer ied.
Rejecte
SUBJECT: No Parking —Price Street East of Ruth Date
DATE: October 4, 1993
Until about a year ago, Price Street east of Ruth functioned as a driveway for Mounds
Park Academy and the School District 622 administration building. At that time, the
city council ordered the street to be barricaded.
The attached letter is signed by both property owners along Price Street east of Ruth.
The letter identifies several problems that resulted in blocking the residents' driveways,
There appears to be no public need to allow parking on this block.
It is recommended the city council establish a no parking zone on both sides of Price
Street east of Ruth and that the public works department be ordered to install
appropriate signage.
KGH
jC
Attachments
CASTLE Ate- � V
COPE AVE �
�
AVE a LAURIE
� RD. � � � LRD o .
RD., � e � � " •, 1700
K
AVE � '�i O
o
none ca ►� •,
0 AVE. N.
PAMSEY COUN7Y
D NUR"54NG
FAJR
felt
c o". 1cv ..L' •' .
Al.DItIG7i
GOV H 0 OVMY O
ARENA
COURSE
PLEY AvE w r� w
KINGSTON AVC
�'
P R)CE AVE. t�
30
im w IF v 0 io
0 1 a 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % a 0 0 41 or % 0 0 0
ALP 2 4 1993
i �
:, . �... ...,.,...,....., • L
9
Mr Mr �f M • FY M w 1r Y r 1. � �r r1/ r W
Of
�-.`
E
-010
AGENDA I TEM �'
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Cit Mana
kotion b Cou
E ndorsed.........
Modified..,,,..
Rejected
Date
Cit En
SUBJECT: Sterlin Scha Public Improvement Re
DATE: . October 6, 1993
The two propert owners ad to the Sterlin Schaller Improvements south of Linwood
Avenue have submitted the attached petition forms. The forms,.as submitted, do not meet
the re of an official petition as described in state statutes., but do represent a
le re for public improvements. This means that if the pro is to continue it
would proceed as a council -initiated public improvement pro The onl impact of this
procedure is a n extraordinar ma or four votes, is re after the public hearin to
proceed with the pro
The first feasibilit stud for these improvements was prepared in 1987. Subse updates.
and alternatives w ere considered over a period of y ears. A portion of the ori pro
north of Linwood Avenue was recentl constructed. The current re addresses the
improvements south of Linwood, Avenue. The old feasibilit stud has all of the basic
information for preparation of a current pro feasibilit report. For this reason,- the cost to
update the information would be relativel minor.
One irre deserves comment. A September 15, 1993, correspondence from James
and .Olivia Ka stipulates two conditions relative to their si on the petition forms.
After discussions with the cit attorne two thin are clear. First, the petition is not a le
petition but onl a re therefore, there is no force of law or statute that is invoked b the
petition document. 'Second, the statements made in the September 15 correspondence are
not bindin on the cit because the cit has taken no action to enter, into a contract with the
Ka. The cit is not a part to the purchase a between the Ka and the
bu therefore, the September 15 correspondence should be considered as informational
onl
It is recommended the cit council order the preparation of a feasibilit stud for the
installation of sanitar sewer, water main, storm sewer, concrete curb and g utter, and paved
streets on Schaller and Sterlin Streets south of Linwood Avenue. Further that a bud of
$3000 be established for the work.
RESOLUTION
ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY STUDY
WHEREAS, it is proposed construct sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, concrete
curb, gutter, and paved streets on Schaller and Sterling Streets south of Linwood Avenue
and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
That the proposed improvement be referred . to the city engineer for study and that he
is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a
preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it
should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the
estimated - cost of the improvement as recommended.
FURTHERMORE, funds in the amount of $3000 are appropriated to prepare this
feasibility report.
DLO
(1) r1AAMIC 3T
It Tim Q �
A CHAII Fci nc
J
m
O
O
O
0
c�
z
t
3
l'oe
COr r e
•z
cr
°3
C IA
7/26/91
FILE N0.
STERLING STREET 92004
A-
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA o RC. No.
Ear
From FIOECKER H`, 0% I R TES FHOHE fro. 812 786 '3 1? 1' ±'�L 7 : AH P01
o ro7 Y
e un�i c3a h� •
• y P Otio thu council Qf the Cit y of
. _T.TI S tZ3 l ? aYl.] C. � i h�C!�.'' , t�J�� r: c orrr�:in an s Y�cx'eC
....,.._........ - c.���m ��we ai xi t;'b e (:curb aryj C;ut
�:t �':� j'� '�t t�`� E. �' •_�tl :.��:1'i 12.1. c:�l: �t t �t1 � � c
... __..�.r.. te�.1. �.t)6' . wi dce.n the EOIlWI Pa c. 1.
` • �•_�.�•Irw +.�.r.�,.A.,.• .:. �.. ....._ TM, ��r�����1A 'M.�+•�wr.�wwr+..wil�r��"1� ��
(a
r� f:hat sari ajji�d ill 1t:()Vem t)t -
b► Und�,c tskoc:t? key t) �� � ct��tn
�r�e «� th Cr)e PV-01 ions of . , y vi l in
o� cl� r t�i� t 8 L t,u.tea t ch ter 42 Vr
t o r • � �, �. � �� �: to � �-� � �� �:� r� ed � � � i � � t h P � �' � � tad �.� � 4 2 r9 • � _r�e�'a �e� proper a� ided b o
Owt)e
bo� Ov
...+. an
q FO L ISK Oc# 41V
... " _ '.i�ivT -.I h.... ..wYYV ....1r...�...+1•rU�r._�y ��`� � � �.� E ATT
. ."�w.+.w.�.�.. M••.�� fir,
r
w.�
�'' • �•+r•ti.aw.�.rwrrrr�••
4
la d,.. ••'r. V . - - _ -- 1 + '
`....._• . �. 1 • . • •
IT
c:ex• ti f t_h.l t I hrivc% wl Lnessed the above :5i natutc:s r and the p
�.ovements discussed with �: ?�c -� .� lc�r���.•r.
ate
L) Li 0 n SpOnSor
the undersigned, do hereby petition the Council of the City of
Maplewood to
Install Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer and Concrete Curb and Gutter
and Paved Streets on Schaller and Sterling Streets within the following Parcel:
I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed
improvements were discussed with the signers.
Date Petition Sponsors
a . V+ c
. ` : ••? ., ,�Z c` ;- r�.� — /LS �� �= T-.�I - 1 '� �-� . �t A; �-�'• _:
and that
the said
improvements be . undertaken by the city council in
accordance-with
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429; and tha�
the cost.
thereof
be assessed against benefited property as provided
by saic
Chapter
4290
Owner S
St reet Address Leal Description
Frontage
Date
..�A/ GS 14.
/<1 y-S c2
,f,, A-I .5 - � - �
SEE ATTACHED
X
y .
0 t/t vi
k
E 51� L_'Vowu C�"Ict k-t� - F
� �) CA i -) U-11WO, C�I_ . M t6 15 r- I I
I certify that I have witnessed the above signatures, and the proposed
improvements were discussed with the signers.
Date Petition Sponsors
a . V+ c
. ` : ••? ., ,�Z c` ;- r�.� — /LS �� �= T-.�I - 1 '� �-� . �t A; �-�'• _:
r
O
r
EXHIBIT A
F LBIT D TO
pURCHASE AGREEMENT
Thirteen (13) Township Twenty-
.- f parcels in Section Thi
The f o g p 2 2) in Ramsey County, Min nesota:
(2 8). , Range Twenty-two
eight
Quarter of the. Northeast
Th
' e South Half of the Southeast Q
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section.
and
feet (722') o
T he North seven hundred twenty-two f the.
of the Nort hwest
_West Half of the Southeast Quarter
Quarter
and
Quarter of the Northeast
hat art of the Southwest Qu heast
T ,
art of the East Half of the Sout
Quarter and that p ich lies westerly of
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter wh
the following described line:
• e Southwest Quarter of
Beginning on the north line of th eet
Beg g
Quarter at a point which is 27.84
the Northeast Quar he Southwest Quarter
1 of the northwest cor of t
easter rne 03 degrees 26
thence South
of the Northeast Quarter; for bearings, a
' es 00 seconds East,. ass bases
minutes ss South 10 degrees 12
.distance of 43.20 f eet ; thence
distance of 277.0 S feet; thence
minutes 3 0 seconds East a Ea a distance of
degrees 09 outh. 0 8 minutes 50 seconds Ea g 47 minutes 5 6 seconds
93, feet ; thence South 64 d egrees
West a di stance o degrees
f 207.54 feet; thence South 09 g
East to the west line of the East.
O 1 minutes 31 seconds carter of the
3 0 feet of said East Half of the Southeast Q
• southerly along said west line
Northwest Quarter, thence
the south line of said .Southeast
of said East 30 feet to the following
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; except
3 3 0 f eet of the South 2 40
The West 300 feet of the East ter of the
'd East Half of the Southeast Quar
feet of sa
Northwest Quarter.
DXB 99032
.S�
r
pandy Noacker
ReW Estate Brok
5066 Rainbow L
Mau S�� 86-6
s H S [verya G Kai
om M Koysw
r Jeanne Kayser.
;y C. rAwcherrl a
i Data w= not OWMA1
.a It v.ould cream a oa
a Nblie Rood
0s
'1o'a
a sofwa
September 15 1993
To the Mayor, City Council, and member of the Staff of the
.C.i ty of Maplewood,
My wife and I have entered into a Purchase Agreement ,for the sale of
our land which is identified by a preliminary plat named Highwood
Meadows. The Buyers have told us that they wish to petition the City
of Maplewood to install road and utility improvements on this land.
It is our understanding that assessments will be levied on the land
for these improvements. The Buyers have requested us to sign a
Petition for this purpose.
We agree and will sign the petition under the following conditions:.
cc>s f S - okk
1.) The City of Maplewood will not incur ee-ts f or which we
would be liable, or could be assessed to us, until the
Buyers have closed the Purchase Agreement and have paid
the monies to us which are due at Closing. We will
notify the City when this has been done.
2.) The City will abide by the an Addendum to the Purchase
Agreement concerning an option of the Seller to possess
certain rocks on the Premises. A copy of this Addendum
is attached.
44
#,,zimes H. Kayser Olivia A. Kayser
516 Linwood Ave . , East
Maplewood, MN 55119
' Phone: 731 -8610
Copies to:
Gary Bastian, Mayor .Fran Juker
1401 Frost Avenue 1965 Barclay Street
t
Maplewood, MN 55109 Maplewood, MN 55109
c
F
George Rossbach Joe Za
g pp a
F 1406 E. County Road C 2522 Flandrau Street
Maplewood, MN 55109 Maplewood, MN 55109
Dale Carlson Ken Haider
1513 Gervais Avenue Geoff Olson
Maplewood, MN 55109 Ken Roberts
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Additional copies sent as shown on page 2.
I
r�
Doherty, Rumble & Bultler
2800 Minnesota World Trade Center
30 East Seventh Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota. 55101
Attn.. Dean Bussey
Charles T. Nixon
800 Title Insurance Building
40.O.Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Larry Severson
600 Midway National Bank Building
7300 West 147th Street
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
Gold Key Development, Inca
.1521 East Highway 13,
Burnsville, Minnesota 55337
JDV Limmited Partnership of Maplewood
Suite 504 7300 West 147th Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55124
1
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action Eby Co cll -v
TO: City Manager Endorse
Modif ie
FROM: City Engineer Rej ecte
])at
e
SUBJECT: Handicap Parking— Kennard Street
DATE: October 4, 1993
The Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary is requesting permission to
change a no parking zone in front of the church to a handicap parking zone. The
request is to establish six handicap parking spaces. The street in this area is wide
enough to accommodate the additional parking.
It is recommended that the church be allowed to establish six handicap parking
spaces directly in front of the church, and the no parking zone in that area be
eliminated.
KGH
jc
Attachments
US AVE.
ROSEWOOD AVE N.
S_ 0
RAACE)
�
AVtort 5. `, NU R C
AVE*
ALMICH
AV e. � � � s u M AVE AREM
a �,
A sr. r � �
PRICE �%. Y
64
0 t*4 *1 0 0
all
V CHURCH OF THE PRESENTATION OF THE B MARY
1 Kennard Street - Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
777 -8116 - 777 -6041
w....
September 24 1993
p �
Kenneth G. Haider `-- ' .'._.. _.. _ • _ w.._ -- - - - _ .
Director of Engineering
City of Maplewood
18.30 East County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr, Haider:
On behalf of the Church of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin
Mary in Maplewood, I would like to request the establishment of
additional handicap parking in front of the Church on Kennard
Street.
This would mean changing the "No Parking" signs in front of the
Church to signs that reserve the space for "Handicap Parking."
The approximate space is one hundred and seventy (170) feet along
Kennard Street which will allow for six (6) handicap parking
spaces. Twenty (20) feet will be left open for direct entrance
into.the Church front doors. The handicap parking spaces will
also stay at least ten (10) feet from any and all.fire hydrants.
This request is in response to numerous people informing our
parish leadership that our present allotted number of handicap
parking spaces is inadequate.
If approved, the new handicap parking spaces on Kennard will
allow more direct access to our Church. In the case of funeral
services, special covers will be used over the signs to read:
"Funeral. No Parking." Obviously, this is to accommodate the
hearse and other funeral procession vehicles.
If you should have any questions or concerns, please let me know.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Fr, Charles V. La howitzer
Pastor
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council.
TO: City Manager
Endorse
FROM: City. Engineer ie
ReJeeted ___._ �.
SUBJECT: County Road B Bus Stop Date
DATE: October 4, 1993
The city received the attached letter from the Metropolitan Transit Commission
concerning the bus stop on County Road B west of Barclay Street. The letter is self
explanatory.
It is recommended the city council establish the bus stop t the intersection of County
ty
Road B and Barclay Street in its original location.
KGH
jC
Attachment
M E T R O
P O L I T A N T R A N S I T C O M M I S S. 1 0 N
560 -6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411-4398., 612/349 -7400
September 2, 1993
Mr. Michael McGuire
City Manager
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797
Dear Mr. McGuire:.
Council Member Joseph Zappa
called me with a concern about a bus stop on County
Road B just west of Barclay in Maplewood.
' from Count
moved this westbound bus. stop y Road B and Barclay to the new location
beside a
vacant lot because of complaints from Mrs. Nord who lives at County Road B
and Barclay. Now the owner of the property at the new location has called Council
Member Zappa and complained about the stop.
The appropriate bus stop .
• location would be at the intersection of County Road B and
.
Barclay where it was before.
I am requesting that you take this issue up at a city council meeting to have it resolved.
Sincere) ,
Wayne R. Babcock
Manager of Street Operations.- East Metro
WRB/Mdd
c: J. Johanson
Maplewood Council Members
AGENDA ITEM S �
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager Endorsed
Modifier?
FROM: City Engineer Rejecterl
Date
SUBJECT: Budget Transfer— Highwood and Century
-DATE: October 4, 1993
Dan Madland owns the property at the northwest corner of Highwood and Century
Avenue in Maplewood. Mr. Madland and his attorney have contacted the city
regarding a drainage problem on site. Under current conditions drainage from the
west and from Highwood Avenue cuts diagonally across the properly, Neither the city
nor the county - have an easement in this location.
City and county -- representatives have met - o n site to discuss the situation. The most
.effective alternative is installation of a pipe along he north side of Highwood g g Avenue
flowing easterly to Century Avenue, and then northerly along Century Avenue to an
existing culvert. It is proposed to install this pipe as a joint effort between Maplewood
and Ramsey County. Maplewood would be responsible for purchasing the materials
p 9
for the project, which would include the pipe and one structure. Ramsey County
tY
would be responsible for the installation of the pipe and restoration of the surface.
The estimated cost of purchasing the materials is about $2500.
It is recommended the city ouncil authorize a budget tY g transfer not to exceed $2500
from the general fund contingenc account to the appropriate ublic
Y p works account to
fund this project.
KGH
jc