Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1993 07-26 City Council Packet
1 AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 26, 1993 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No, 93 -16 A. CALL TO. ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting of July 8, 1993 2. Minutes of Special City Council Meeting of July 8, 1993 3. Minutes of Meeting 93 -15 (July 12, 1993) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS 1. Fulton Klinkerfues Day, July 30, 1993 F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion. There w i l l be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item w i l l be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. I. Approval of Claims 2, Nature Center Donations 3. Final Plat: Goff's Mapleview Fourth Addition 4. Final Plat: Northwood Village 5. Acceptance of Community Center Bid Package #1: Site Clearing 6. 934 Evar Street G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M.: Real Estate Sign Ordinance 2. 7:15 P.M.: 586 Carlton Street (Kinderberry Hill) Conditional Use Permit Design Review, 3. 7:30 P.M.: Conditional Use Permit: 2633 Stillwater Road (Carbone's Pizza) H.. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Hiring Park Maintenance Person I �. Motor Vehicle Repair Ordinance Update J. NEW BUSINESS 1, Construction Agreement and Increased Front Setback: Sterling St., South of Carver Ave. (Korfs) 2. Sign Plan Change: Birch Run Station 3. Signs for Parks 4. Commercial Property Study 5. Ordinance - Building Plan Review Procedure (2nd Reading) 6. Park Development - "Systems Account" 7. Preliminary Approval of 1993 Refunding Bonds, Community Center Bonds and Equipment Certificates 9. Open Space Preservation K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 2. N. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCI1JMANAGER WOl �K3HOP OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. MAPLEWOOD 5:00 p.m., Thursday, July 8, 1993 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council/Manager meetin of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood 9 g Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 5:05 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Councilperson Dale Carlson Councilperson Fran Juker Councilperson George Rossbach Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Present Present P resent Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager. Gretchen Maglich Public Works Director Ken Haider Director of .Public Safety Ken Collins Finance Director Dan Faust C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Zappa and was approved. Ayes: All D. 1991 FIRE DEPARTMENT AUDITS/ 993 BUDGET Ci ty Ma er McGuire reviewed the reasons that the 1991 auw4 r tof Parkside Fire Department had not been completed and stated that he had two issues t01 , ::;:cuss about the 1991 audit: Should Parkside's C.P.A. or Peat Marwick be hired to complet; ,? a audit? and Does the Council want to authorize payment of an invoice by Parkside's accountant for services associated with the audit? Following considerable discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that the City Council has not changed its pre.vi.ous intention of having the City's auditor complete a 1991 audit of all Fire departments - and related funds, and the City Manager was directed not to pay the invoice at this time. 1 City Manager McGuire3t.pr -e anpa consultant, Mr. Bill Bruen, which detailed the services he would proyi.c#a -a It bw-as o' � - d ee in drafting a 1993 contract. There was some discussion abouV- rAstue0snobidcafti Rig the contract and negotiating with the Fire departments. Councilrx sbAch riuved that the Mr. Bill - Bruen be hired -to draft a performance based 1 d � - 's current contract and Council input for a fee not to exceed $3,000 t odhO g� IbAhe Council for discussion as soon-as possible. The motion was secor%d e-qd,.*,fi0ouo cilp sondIuker and was approved. Fg Ayes: All .=,�.,� �,. Finance Director Faust, = L r c- of Fabk Safety Collins left the meeting at 6:00 p.m. E. CITY HALL EXTENDEUN O L ' -7E Due to the limited time l iadtahe W a& fif id ussed. F. COMMUNITY CENTEMOR3NZATIAL. CHART Due to the limited time :this:, �i #� �- ikl ussed. The meeting was recess at4M pfzs. reoes- The meeting was reco _ "erred t* ap. G. PROJECT REVIEW CMa'EISE?.RESENTATION Assistant City Manager` a s `n.teck#e staff report about the Project Review Committee's final repo , of m. msnendat Committee members present were Joe Fittipaldi, Jim Roehl, D. JAMtpr,� T ;ry Metz Ken Haider and Frank Frattalone. There was some discussion abouteeer�Iy_nd establishing along -term road reconstruction plan. Mayor Bastian r d Ekect fleview Committee's report be accepted as presented and be plaoe�i � tIL d cil /Manager workshop agenda with THE PAVER, and that the report be.. „ring i. y tion of Maplewood in Motion. The motion was seconded by Councilpsoneir r cm 0 m , " approved. Ayes: All rytia... ' H. OTHER BUSINES CK` ^4 Cr F .'.-, , US'iNO '.' There was no THER `_BU =¢�, r, I. FUTURE TOPICS P `° f r � Tod';;,`,�11 There were no add itioffbtfR A nTn fls J. ADJOURNMENT- ,, The meeting was adjoGthedablth a SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 6:30 p.m., Thursday, July 8, 1993 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The special meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 5:45 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Councilperson Dale Carlson. Present Councilperson Fran Juker Present Councilperson George Rossbach Present Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Representatives from McGough Construction, Construction Manager: Dick Gunderson, Mark Adamson, and Ned Dripps Representatives from AKRW, Architects: Fred Richter and Marianne Repp- O'Brien C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Carlson and was approved. Ayes: All D. AWARD OF BIDS: COMMUNITY CENTER BID PACKAGE #3.- GENERAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS City Manager McGuire introduced the item, and Assistant City Manager Maglich presented details of the bid tabulations for each contract, the schedule of alternates that were selected, construction budget, overall project budget, and the contingency for chap construction. Following some discussi es during g on, Councilmember Zappa moved that the project be postponed for one year. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Juker and was defeated. Ayes: Juker and Zappa Nays: Bastian, Carlson and Rossbach Followin g p more discussion, Council erson Rossbach moved to award the contract for general construction to Adolfson & Peterson in the amount of $5,372,300, the low bidder including the base bid and selected alternates; award the contract for mechanical cons_ truction to Doody Mechanical in the amount of $2,125,300,, the low bidder including selected alternates: award . the contract for electrical construction to Hunt Electric in the amount of $964,560, the low bidder including .selected alternates for the community center project: and authorize the Mayor and the City manager to execute the necessary documents on behalf of the City. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and was approved. Ayes: Bastian, Carlson and Rossbach Nays: Juker and Zappa There was some discussion about_ the expectation of the Council that the Community Center would be a self - supporting entity. Councilperson Zappa moved that all policies and practices of the community center are to be supported with the philosophy- hat the center is to strive for a break -even operational budget, and feedback to the Council will be provided that supports this self - sustaining operational position. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Juker and was approved. Ayes: Bastian, Juker, and Zappa Nays: Carlson and Rossbach E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m. 2 I MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 12, 1993 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 93 -15 A.. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to. order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. Acting Mayor Jukes made an announcement regarding final arrangements for Tom Hagen, former Deputy Chief of the Maplewood Police Department, and extended the City's condolences to his family and friends. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Absent Frances L Juker, Acting Mayor Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of Meeting 93 -14 (June 28, 1993) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No . 93 14(June 28, 1993) as presented, Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the Agenda as amended: L 1 Highway 61 and County Road C L 2 Bicycle Patrol L 3 Engineering Division Revenues L 4 Busses. L-5 Wetlands L 6 FBI School L 7 Letters to Bill Mikiska and Bob Bade J 9 White Bear Avenue Construction J10 Attorney Client Session re'Litigation Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 1 7 -12 -93 'J E= APPOINTNENTUPRESENTATIONS 1. Appointment of Human Relations Commissioner a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Council invited Shelly Strauss to the podium to meet the Council. c. Councilmember Zappa moved to accept. staff recommendation and appoint Shel 1 v K. Strauss of 2153 Arkwri ght Street to f i 11 the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission .created by the resignation of Dawn Vassar, with the term to expire on December 31. 19940 Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker Ayes - all F. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Zappa moved, seconded by Councilmember Carlson: ayes - all to approve the consent agenda items F -1 through F -6 as recommended: 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 840,411.89 92 , 072.45 a 93.2,484.34 PAYROLL: $ 213 $ 45,456.09 $ 258 $14191430069 Checks #1018- #1132 Dated 6 -4 -93 thru 630 -93 Checks #10375 - #10436 Dated 7 -12 -93 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks #35418 thru #35609 Dated 7 -2 -93 Payroll Deduction Checks #35614 thru #35629 dated 7 -2 -93 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Budget Transfer Request: Personnel Costs for Cable TV Technician Authorized a transfer of $2,300 from the Contingency Account, 101 -119 -000 4910, to the Public Relations Wages /Part -time and Temporary Account, 101- 111- 000 -4020, for personnel costs. of cable casting the City Council meetings. This cost will be reimbursed by Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission. 2 7 -12 -93 3. Easement Description Correction, Project 90 -08 93 -07 -91 RESOLUTION AMENDING EASEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood has deemed it appropriate that the easement description recorded as Document 254688 between Martha Kujawa, grantor, and the City of Maplewood, grantee, be amended. The erroneous description is as follows. The South five feet of Lots 27 and 28, Block 15, Gladstone The correct description is as follows: The South five feet of Lot 27, Block 15, Gladstone NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD., MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Manager accept said amended easement description. 4. Conditional Use Permit Termination: Maplewood East Shopping Center Ended the Conditional Use Permit for a coin - operated amusement facility at the Maplewood East Shopping Center, 2950 White Bear Avenue. 5. Final Plat: Countryview.Summit Approved the final plat for Countryvi ew Summit, a 37-lot plat for single dwellings located north of Beam Avenue and west of Highway 61, 6* 934 Evar Street Accepted the status report from staff on 934 Evar Street. G. P NONE H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Bituminous Overlay a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider responded to questions about the overlay project, c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 3 7 -12 -93 93 -07 -92 RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Tower Asphalt in the amount of $91,422.50 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Bituminous Overlay, City Project 93 -07, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NONE J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Sign Plan Change: Crown Plaza Shopping Center (Goodyear Tire Center) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. CO Commissioner Anitzberger presented to Community Design Review Board opinion. d. Acting Mayor Juker asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: Gordon Latchana, 11030 , Bloomington, Manager of the Goodyear Store commented on his need for the sign. e. Councilmember Zappa moved to deny the request for an additional pylon sign, but to allow Goodyear to remove its existing 3 , sign at the top of the Crown Plaza pylon and replacing it with a 7'x14,' _sign at the bottom of the same polo. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Acting M ay o r J u k e r, Councilmembers Carlson, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Rossbach 29 1745 Edgerton Street: Temporary Manufactured Home This item was removed from the Agenda at the request of the applicant. 3. Pull Tab Gambling Permit for Hill Murray Fathers Club, Inc. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Acting Mayor Juker asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. 4 7 -12 -93 c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 93 07 - 93 APPROVING CHARITABLE GANBLING BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota: that the premises permit for lawful gambling is approved for H i l l Murray Fathers Club, Inc. to be located at Red Rooster Lounge, 2029 Woodlyn Avenue. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minn. Statutes No, 349.213. FURTHERMORE, that the Maplewood City Council requests that the Gambling Control Division of the Minnesota Department of Gaming approve said permit application as being in compliance with Minn. Statutes No, 349.213. NOW, THEREFORE, be it further resolved that this Resolution by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, be forwarded to the Gambling Control Division for their approval. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 4. Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d* Councilmember Zappa moved t,_ o approve first reading of the Building Pl en Review Procedure with Option 2, requ ri, ng that the City notify the neighbors .of a requ. es,for a different front setback. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 5. County Road C. Project 89 -04: Concurrence of Award and Change Order No. 1 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution, and moved its adoption: 5 7 -12 -93 93 -07 -94 RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Danner, Inc. is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of County Road C __ Improvements City Project 89 -04, and the Mayor and Clerk are .hereby authorized and directed to notify Ramsey County that the City concurs in the award of the contract to said bidder. The ro 'ect bud et is amended to $762,766.87, and the project financing P J g is amended as follows: Assessments $167,650.00 Off - system MSA 273 General. obligation 3214666.,87 $762,766.87 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 93 -07 -95 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 89 -04, and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project-89-04, Change Order 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in the amount of <$43,766.87> (deduct). The project budget is amended to $719,000.00. The project financing is amended as follows: Assessments $167,650 Off- system MSA .273 General obligation _27749_00 $719,000 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 6. White Bear Avenue, Project 89 -12:. Change Order No., 4 a. Manager McGuire presented .the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider responded to questions about the project. 6 7 -12 -93 M a c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 93 -07 -96 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project '89-12 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 89 -12 Change Order 4.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 4 in the amount of $4370. The project budget is amended to $32,530. The project financing is amended as follows: Sanitary sewer fund $323,720 Ramsey County 51 Street Construction State Aid 59.280 $432,530 Note: Change Orders 1 through 3 did not involve the City of Maplewood Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker Ayes - all 7. Mall Area Traffic, Project 89 -21: Budget Increase a. Manager McGuire presented the.staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. C* Councilmember Carlson moved to authorize staff to engage Evergreen Land Services Company to make initial contacts and hold discussions with property owners regarding, ri ght- of -wav costs and associated construction constraints relative to Mall Area Traffic, Project 89-21. and to budget an additional $2.000 to finance, their work. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 8. Community Center Ground Breaking Ceremony a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to hold the Community Center Ground Breaking Ceremony on August 5. 1993 at 4:00 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember.Carlson Ayes - all 7 7 -12 -93 -J J 9. White Bear Avenue Construction - Variance.From Noise Ordinance a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b,, Greg Bel ke, 269 66th Ave.. N.. E . , Fridley, Concrete Engineer for the . stated the reasons for the .request and responded to questions from the Council. c. Councilmember Zappa moved to _recognize this as an emergency situation and authorize Shafer Construction to operate through the night on 2 nights during the week, and until 9:00 P.M_on the other nights, as a variance from the Noise Ordinance, and to direct staff to notify all the residents in the construction area. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all COUNCILMEMBER ZAPPA MOVED TO AMEND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND HEAR VISITOR PRESENTATIONS BEFORE J -10 (WHICH WILL BE A CLOSED SESSION) SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON AYES - ALL K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON MOVED TO RECESS THE MEETING AND MOVE INTO CLOSED SESSION TO HEAR J -10, REGARDING .LITIGATION. SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON AYES - ALL ACTING MAYOR JOKER RECESSED THE MEETING AT 8:18 P.M. TO ENTER THE CLOSED SESSION. ACTING MAYOR JOKER RECONVENED THE MEETING AT 8:30 P.M. L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Highway 61 and County Road C a. Councilmember Zappa commented on the amount of noxious weeks growing in the area by the auto dealer and on the State property which have not been cut. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct staff to send letters to the property owners regarding . cutting the weeds. Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker Ayes - all 7 -12 -93 v 2. Bicycle Patrol a. Councilmember Zappa questioned the memo Council had received regarding the Bike Patrol - how it got approved and what the cost will be. b. Director of Public Safety Collins responded to questions regarding implementation of the Bike Patrol. c . Council member. Zappa moved to postpone t i on on the Bike Patrol until it can be discussed further by Counc 1 NOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND 3. Engineering Division Revenues a. Councilmember Zappa stated he had some questions regarding the memo regarding Engineering Revenues and moved to place this on the Agenda for discussion at the next CouncillM_anager Meeting. Seconded by Acting Mayor Juker Ayes - all 4. Busses a. Councilmember Rossbach commented on the MTC hearing he attended with Director of Pubic Works Haider at which MTC proposed a reduction in service. Councilmember Rossbach questioned whether this was an item of concern that the Council should pursue. b. Councilmember Zappa stated his understanding was that the route proposed to be canceled had very little ridership and would probably not adversely affect Maplewood residents. 5. Wetlands a. Councilmember Rossbach questioned.what the status was with the Open Space Committee and the proposed buffer zones, as well as the status of the Wetlands Ordinance. 6. FBI School a. Acting Mayor Juker asked whether the most recent attendant at the FBI School had supplied a report regarding his training. b. Director of Public Safety Collins responded to questions regarding the training. c. Acting Mayor Juker moved to direct staff to supply a report.of the train.inq and include information on how this training will benefit Maplewood. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 9 7 -12 -93 7. Letters to Bill Nikiska and Bob Bade a. Actin g Mayor Juker commented on the letters of thanks sent by the Director of Emergency Management to Bill Mikiska and Bob Bade. b. Acting Mayor Juker moved the City send letters of appreciation to Bill Mi ki s ka and Bob Bade also. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all c. Councilmember Carlson stated he felt this would be a good opportunity for an article in the newspapers regarding Mapl ewood's cooperation with other Cities. N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS !HIRIO N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 8:53 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City clerk 10 7 -12 -93 FA -/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD WHEREAS, Mr. Fulton Klinkerfues has committed the last forty -one years of his career to public education; and WHEREAS, for the last thirty -nine years, Mr. Klinkerfues has worked for the North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale School District 622 in various positions of responsibility; and WHEREAS, following his twenty years as Assistant Principal, Mr. Klinkerfues was appointed Principal of John Glenn Middle School in 1986; and WHEREAS, Mr. Klinkerfues rose to become, at his retirement, the oldest employee in point of service in District 622; and WHEREAS, throughout his educationallinstructional career, Mr. Klinkerfues has served the teaching profession in numerous ways including holding the position of President of Minnesota Education Association and President of the local MEA chapter; and WHEREAS, Mr. Klinkerfues has been honored by the University of Minnesota College of Education as its Distinguished Alumni Award Winner and the City of Maplewood Human Relations Commission in 1990 for his work in integrating handicapped students into regular mainstream education in cooperation with School District 916 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD does hereby thank Mr. Fulton Klinkerfues for his commitment to public education; and proclaim Friday, July 30, 1993, the Fulton IOra wgIzes Day in Maplewood, Minnesota; and extend the City's warmest wishes to him for a healthy and happy retirement. Mayor Gary Bastian AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director :�- RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: July 19, 1993 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 529 Checks # 1133 thru # 1191 Dated 7 -1 -93 thru 7 -14 -93 $ 222,871.98 Checks # 10455 thru # 10629 Dated 7 -26 -93 $ 752, 817.07 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL $ 216,143.93 Payroll Checks # 35643 thru # 35848 dated 7 -16 -93 $ 45 Payroll Deduction check #35853 thru # 35867 dated 7 -16 -93 $ 261 Total Payroll 1 014 , 725.80 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. lz Attachments FINANCE/APPRCLM.AGN vtr • i i Y 1Y � i U C H IN" E G l: I • r Y t_t F M .R' P L. I_. W 00 D F A "i E I 1 1" _ R I� I ..D � I 4 3 { ,_ - -� - 4 }::. V k.1-•1 D 1 _� j i ! 1 i L is } -. V L 1 1; S i i 1 1 - i I T E 11 1 T E M t C W E'. C K' , 5 1'4 I_.1 i 1 B R t U M E, ' E I l D A I E ('N I 14 E D E 1 4 ..: I I PT 10 N fik {' 10 U[%I T A 1 7 r 1 0 U N 1 f 6 f • 1 _ _ t. J ? •r .., C L. f t:. F 1 l > �i' I :1 T . C L l .� t . tt ,.: # I.) I �1 , Y F . L l 1�1 a F _. 7 c 14 u _� 1 8 - ;; 1 9 10 " • _ w J U L �� 1 `: ` `:''` . % t A T E. L_. {'a i _ g _ w t_ _ '• } {_) . ' f {) 1 1 11 (} i� j �t 1 { U L Y 1 ':' `:, S) I A � I_. M f � f N T � + ' °r 1 n i � 5t 12 1 -'/0 1 ^/ l" •�' •y_ »t �- i -, r — , 1 �. ' t' -f 15 2 16 _ ,;`t t • ^. tF`• '' J U L Y 1 ., :r :; >_, t A �I E. i'!1 E :.1.a 'i ' 31 ' , _t ,` t i� r r t`. � , y . !_t 4 . 1, 2 17 2. 18 j - ti _ . ;- ..., _ _ -, , r•. ' L ,- r •r , — k! G 19 2 1 �..� 7 - 6- f~ t �. (� } : _. w 1 1 � . ) { �r _� �. 7z � 1 � .:_. .. .... t ; ; ` ,. :.'^ .. f .i� � T 1..1 A i. ; 1,... I F �. IN ,� f. 1"� � Iii �. �. .. - '} ( j j I_� L 1 j ` s r n + ,� 7 k "i t �. 1�1 }.. I 1 � . . 2 21 ; ,,, 11 4 76 - 2 22 j r i' i "t • ` l { � } j J I_! L Y 1 t� : r : t i_ Y I ' rl •t 1 _. M E t-1a "! i -, `•� I.E , ,�/ • t tom, t ,ar n :+ 2: '3 23 i U L Y 1 ` °' `: / »� L; 1 : t I^_.1' I . I' - I - - 1 , _ ( . 1 !-r } `� 4 u ': / '_ 1 3 24 3 25 S I l) 1{ .1 �: {. 1 t. ,�t .l ,.a .l l 1 3 R E s 4 .. T i� l c.• >. r 1 i s, >a . l a:: 1 . 7 26 • 3 28 3 J. 1 =1 c�:� 1 1 ca i i t} J 1' . S - �� - f T R I^ A S 1..1 R E h 1~•I OT t_ j R '� L H L I �• F I::: E":* P A Y t E. l.. F �� .r y �.:_. ,�r tl 38 �. +,: � t13 _, , 3 30 4' t 1 4 1 31 - /�• + if J { / _ r rk ] L I C• �. � � l.. _ � �. �. I . , -, r ,i , r i '� ,. f-� , ," 4 4. 32 ` LL �{ _ + }. 33 , ; .. 4 1 1 JAI �. r r? ►.�, c�} ca r ! } ;.: ` =' :� F �+: I C �:: +�t i�l C: ; i f �i �, i Fi �� C: - I" ��� 'i �i T LEI n _ i-�: I . i I�� O F E S � • L'` t_t 1 E E h R C J : f t � — 01 ��t t_) t � n i 0 4 4 , 35 R E. T U R 1 \1 1_t f' L_ S (_ R M! r.. D 1;` R 0 J :' 0 �_} 1 = n �1 :. 5 0 n 4 4 36 4 114 5 _ _ j •_ {_. t � _ 4. f ': •..► I i'1, [-�1 h�l „ � 1° A C � t �c .� � � 1.� � k. h ; , 1 Tl i iJ r l l f.! � �; ti r 7 u �. 1 4 51 38 t r , -• .r Y fZ ) t1 F" �: •.1 4 + p J. F, ,: ,mss —r "'� 6. n rr ! 5 39 : 5. 40 1 14 4 1 t_} : i � (! {) is i '/ = {_ t L L I� , i 1_t 1'a t ,_.. . - j E !- I_� L . s': F�` i i + r °l 1W .., 7 / _ ti. {�) f ,+ s_ .� 17 f t _ 5 0 n 5 1 '~, 5i 41 5 1 16 2" 11 C ki I C: , r ,- 4:� 44 43 .. 31 a S. ' 5 44 1 14 6 1 9 0 4 - 0 0 _ .. {� i r I 0% : _: s -t �- r� i:" �' D EPT � s: t F N r �:# � u, F " 0 U h " ` ,� r. , ;` -, .t N I=� . L^ I C i ,t L F 1 w E ` � I= A 1' � i B4 L E 1" : .. � t�} 5, 1 45 61 46 1. 1. i : l `:'' 0 ^1. c�, {�) r ! i ") ;� / :.' �� I? 1:.1 -` I n t_) f� 1 A 1 Li t, A L r" E. r : ; 1,�1 1J R ;�+ L L_� .}! W ! r I I ! .:. `_ 1 f n i;) f; 1 () n 00 6 47 6: 48 _. _ 50 { : 3 , 1 - t' F' r . f. l i'� () _t r ) �' } �r �; 4 ! , _ f Y �� x '� "" ` t '�' 1 f .� t ti t'4 a y.r �~ u i !�. i ti I.j.'~. . Y j_! 1 { 1 ' t t ` -� f` . °� f� "+ i t_ 1 f I - , t is }'i �. .� 4 • 1 ° ' I* 1w. t �! , J. f t .t 1 «� a .t i'� t »} 1 n 6. g 51 61 52 1 15 #_) i , :. ! ! i t ;r ,= {) f % '.. �'_+ r/ ;/ �+ F t.1.1 1 l=�.� t! 1 I':;• (+ t — + ' ,: • -- / ;,, j' (� 1, t » ! �; F} {_} u ,: 71 55 56 w i - ( 0 j 0 ' ii .. t ,. } r ; r ,�, ,� }'r r` i.. :, j _ r., .• l:1 . i� f= 1-1 � L_ 7' f"1 ;� C: n , r ... i R t:. F I_i l� 1 U U 1" F l�'t ! F• ,- V n ,�, .) 1 r. 7; 74 a:1. G 7: 1 l n , ^r 57 71 L_' L -J!_ L1_11LlILIIL :!_L__L_l iiL A -i It., _ I LL, Affli J, 1 7 7 23 1. 1. 51 7' b4l 40 0 9 MP4N. S'FATE TR`EASLJf*_(E__R MO TOR VEH L I C. F S P A Y A B LIE 17 -3 7 5 1 3 1 31 24 25 'AYABLE 84(. 0: 4: Q 00 5 54140-0 7/.:_iS I I N S TArl' E T R E A S. U R E F S T A'TE DR' V E 1: S L.. I Cr FE E'S F' ol • 28 3 1. 16. 0 5 3 1 Of 3 M E T R 0 WASTE CONTROL C 0 M M I S lq 500 00 31 U 32 Q v G _R c;i _c;K I 33 5 FOR R TO D 0 2 6 1, 16.1 -541400 0 0 S Ij F � M N 11 TAJ E JRE B.4 S� TA T'E D R 1 V E F� L 1 .0. E P Y A I` L fi�, 3 4 P1 E P .4 CH E V E ND C). C • H E %�_-'K V E 11 D 0 R 1 . Ell . 1* I f lyl C H E 'K 5 6 N Ll M B E R N. U M.' R D Al_ k" lyl E_ I .., I P.T IAN J A J 1`4 T A 11 Cl U N T 7 9 39 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 it'. 9 .�:4 s r CC Zl T* 1): D'UR E Al) A A It CO L. L. A t" P-1 IC Y SE R V I CIE S G 5 9 10 t 19 9 6 G 04) 12 ()T 9 A 1= L. 1 fi 9- M P_ D I gAl A C_ �_[`l I h I C T I J= 0 Pil M 1) Y E FG R G 6 6 �3 ER V 1 G E in u A 13 2 1.164 9 0 5J 0 0 7 -:3 B R E H E I M R 0 G ER 1 :,3 p R, . 14 1. 1'r 4 2' 1 17 0 9 3 F 1 f-, T' '*- E-'U F." I T Y I TL_ E Ll I I L. I TI Y S E R*V I C E CHAR S, 44.4-4. 44.44 15 5�]'l `50 07' /* 3 M ET'R W A:-' T E O N TR 0 L C: 0 11 M I S 11 I '45,"D S E A l'i i--' SE R Vl C E_ 1 4- 0:1 00 16 3 Fi 0 0 193 m . A R STATE DRIVERS LI C EN SE FEES s Q J 8 8 5 0 0 17 j:� G 141 0 A i;'ID W F 20 1 7 7 23 1. 1. 51 7' b4l 40 0 9 MP4N. S'FATE TR`EASLJf*_(E__R MO TOR VEH L I C. F S P A Y A B LIE 17 -3 7 5 1 3 1 31 24 25 'AYABLE 84(. 0: 4: Q 00 5 54140-0 7/.:_iS I I N S TArl' E T R E A S. U R E F S T A'TE DR' V E 1: S L.. I Cr FE E'S F' ol • 28 3 1. 16. 0 5 3 1 Of 3 M E T R 0 WASTE CONTROL C 0 M M I S lq 500 00 31 32 33 5 34 6 1, 16.1 -541400 0 0 S Ij F � M N 11 TAJ E JRE B.4 S� TA T'E D R 1 V E F� L 1 .0. E P Y A I` L fi�, 35 7 36 8 5 4 1 4 ti) 0 C) T 0 11 N N 1 Al T E T R E A S U P'E R lyl Cl T C! F,-%' V E -1 1 1 C_' F EE'; P A Y A B L E 18 3 7 2� 5 37 5 38 9 39 0 A.14�! 40 W14 41 42 2 1.164 9 0 5J 0 0 7 -:3 B R E H E I M R 0 G ER 1 :,3 p R, 43 3 44 5�]'l `50 07' /* 3 M ET'R W A:-' T E O N TR 0 L C: 0 11 M I S 11 I '45,"D S E A l'i i--' SE R Vl C E_ 1 4- 0:1 00 45 171 475 00 f 46 i5 47 j:� G 141 0 A i;'ID W F 48 P 49 50 18 1 1 7 0 0 7 4 0. 1 L 1 U S I Q N T f A TER �`U A HAR SSMEN.7' TRA llql.NG 51 19 T Q a I ' Li r 1 ' 41 j C C 52 �o EXI I L H A A rS* "-3 ly! EN 7 A J A TR 100 ■ ( 0 0 0 . 0 53 54 55 56 1 . 13F_ U 'T IL IT I ES 0 4 57 58 14 r I L I 59 15 60 16 u J I L I f I ICE i3` 1 01 at 61 62 17 I 63 64 19 UT U. I I 65 66 50 [j I j — 1 0 1 45 5 67 2 el 68 69 E C . 70 53 71 54 7 . 72 73 5 t 7 74 56 LJ 1. L I I E 0 ' 3 4 75 I T I T "i, I' L." P. C 1 176, "AGE 0 V () U C F! R E G IT`� 01 1.. lyhk F* L E'Vil 1-1 !-D D 1/8 4- 14 D A 9 R E 1 4' ERV 19 41 31 41400 81 p f.Lt-1 T R-EA S. U R E-.R 3 M M 0,1. f VEH L 1 C P 5 PAYA8-LE 2 1 c - 42 32 OR F E7 IR 111 D 0 7 50 E_ R 1 6 6-11 0 07 1 9 3 N 0. RT H E R N s 1� A E S F u W I T I. ES I L 2 33 7 4r 4 6 1 2 51 45 .1 34 S U P 1-2 L I '�33 3 3 35 S li P P L 1E S OFF 'I C E 70 47 4 V 0 W C- H 9 R 4 C H E C K E 1\1 D 0 48 ► 5 _ _ 6 49 5 kl U lyl BE R NUMBER D A T*E N M E F , 1 . 4 A lil A- IJ N T A Ivi 0 U N T 7 OFF-ICE 6 51 5 76 8 39 40 7 • 0 F Ci F* F- I C E 4 4.30. 1 92' UT I L. IT I ES -:1.64 179 60, 9 8 U TIL I T I t_ J L ._ - `5 ' b 4 157 9 - L S ?!3 1 i 84 o fn 12 10 11 U I'l L 1 11- 1 E S 4 -.3- 13 14 15 12 N ORT141iRN 4; T AT F-- 9 P i 4 9 R L i T i E 16 17 13 U'l 1 L. I T'l ES 3 .. _ 18 14 T ILL I ES 0 15 4 20 21 16 U T L IT I E- S 1540 J, 22 17 U' i' I L I T 1 E 'S' 16- 0 0 4.72 23 97-E 18 li T L i , 25 19 w UT 1 L.1 T 11 ES 5 5 -31 26 27 20 U TIL IT I E 6 1 28 21 • 29 22 U T I L 1T 'l. E S 4. 30 23 24 U J* I L I T ES 4'.'6 2 1 4 5 31 32 25 1 , 1 To 1.9 0 4 0 0 -0 7: f DEPT ;OF lq AT U R A L. RE E S D RN- L I C iE N 0 E F EES P A Y A RLE A 20*i Of.. ti 0 0 33 34 26 35 3 27 1 0A A r xl 1 a al 1wzz R-A Y A I;_.- N R L I G 0-1 P; R E ig 37 291 r� 'r - 39 117 Z' 5, 4 1 -4 0 0 0 7 / 0 9 MINN. TREASJURER T r.'IATE DRIVERS LI(.- FLEES PAY'rl"�BLE 1 1 0 0 ("t . :---'5 1 5 0 0 0 . L-7--' 5 140 30 D A 9 R E 1 4' ERV 19 41 31 41400 81 p f.Lt-1 T R-EA S. U R E-.R 3 M M 0,1. f VEH L 1 C P 5 PAYA8-LE 2 1 c - 42 32 50 E_ R 1 6 6-11 0 07 1 9 3 N 0. RT H E R N s 1� A E S F u W I T I. ES I L 43 44 33 7 4r 4 6 1 67 68 51 45 .1 34 S U P 1-2 L I '�33 69 46 35 S li P P L 1E S OFF 'I C E 70 47 53 1 ED • -'' 48 36 J= I ID F- i;: I 4,7 7-4 49 37 li P 0 F F 1 5 7 9 4 50 c' T 74 75 OFF-ICE 13 .6 -5 4 51 5 76 52 39 40 U 1:--' 1-' L. I E US • 0 F Ci F* F- I C E 4 4.30. 1 92' 53 7 5 0 a 8 3 54 ' 41 55 56 157 431 158 59 .0: . 2 1, , 4 0 44 RG f"' DUF'��!:�AYIIENT-ON A f ML-*,'l-ACC'. 3 Ot'..-*.'T fir. 0 4 2 4 9 3 M R S GEC -A 5 4 0 6 6 5 60 45 --- ------ 61 46 TE R M IN ATI ON C il-i C K 0 7 - 93 151 62 1 1 '77 0 1 2--'4 0 07 '09/93 GARRY 1411 LL I AM 48 r' IQ: W- W W I D 14 Q D A 9 R E 1 4' ERV 19 65 49 66 50 E_ R 1 6 6-11 0 07 1 9 3 N 0. RT H E R N s 1� A E S F u W I T I. ES I L 1 7 67 68 51 9 1 6 9.1-4 69 . .... ..... 52 U T I L I T I S 1 4 4 04 70 53 U T I L. '1' T I E cr 1 ED 71 72 54 T i i- i I F= bU 73 55 U T 11 E S 7' 'J c' T 74 75 1 56 T I ES 5 76 571 43 F; 5 E34 58 UTI'LlTIES 1 , U C Fl [`E G YC vo IQ 04 A T ii k-,: Q G, M M 4" 9 1 14 ii R 6) T 16 1 T i. 6;� I 10 L- 6 H- 0 LIT I ES 7- f H .9 Cl 4 VG I T Y Ci F M A—r; W 0 Cl D it, 11 E G � 4 E H E. G � S 4* E R 34 P AC-*l E 4 1 Y 8 55. 6 i 35 U T 1. L I !- I i � : e -i FOR PERl*.OD 07' 47 2 36 2 48 37 U T I L. I T 1 E S A 18 3 49 50 3 38 U 1 .1 2 5 51 4 TF 'QF a 9 1:6., 4 G 4 52 40 z -zi T 1 L 1 1 1 E S 175 C-1 7 15 53 54 4 C. H E 1 V LE. \1 b C R H E C" I- V E fli-D Cl R' • . � t >~ ! {( C. Fl E 11'.* 6 5 1*-,l Ul fll a" R i -L N U f-i E*.'E R D A T E N 11 E j i. L .. L-- C' C., !' 1 p I Cl 1\1 A M 0 U 14 T A lyi Cl U N T 7T 6 9 7 U T l `1 1 ES 741 4 10 ES i G 12 10 LI T I L I I" I L e=t 1 4-0 1 e- 0 9 13 14. 1 - U I L .1 -f .1 E-D I !i" 1 7 7 15 12 1 G 16 13 UTI L IT I ES 2 1 c. 4 3, 17 18 14 tj T. 11 L 11 -M I E-- 2 3 il - 5 515 19 15 Q lt L i "i -S 2 - 9 i 9 u G 4 20 16 " U T T. L I T I E S 4 0 `5 7 'el 5 21 22 17 I C.-I C) 23 18 U 4' 24 25 19 U T I L I T I E S 26 20 UTTL-lflES I 4Z 5 4 5 7 u 27 21 2 8 22 10 51 0 0 07 12 ".9 3 V A" K C RUBBISH REMOVAL Z) R U TE; B H R Efel U V A L I E R D B- w 1:�. is "o 29 30 40 23 Vr'k S K 0 R' L.1• I S H R E A 0 V A L. .6 57 1 31 32 24 33 25 34 26 I I 1 54 1 4 0 0:7 1 2 P., 3 M I I" S;"Y TE ,::r TR Ept S U R 4 E R S. ST P TE �DR L I C HE' F S:. f` A -p 7 ' F 35 27 3 6 28 11 0 0 0 ,*, jyj T R E A S J F` E R 1 NIA "FATE lyl 01 R VEH L I C F E 7' -74-4 "il 0 37 .7. 38 744 0 40 29 39 43 F; 5 E34 58 UTI'LlTIES 30 I i R- Q 9 9 w_ 7 i ;i� 93 L4 CD F 31 32 33 04 A T ii k-,: Q G, M M 4" 9 1 14 ii R 6) T 16 1 T i. 6;� I 10 L- 6 H- 0 LIT I ES 7- f H .9 Cl 4 41 42 43 44 34 U T I L I T I 1E.' S 6 55. 45 46 35 U T 1. L I !- I i � : e 7' :]t 47 36 w T i L 48 37 U T I L. I T 1 E S A 18 4 0: 49 50 050 38 U 1 .1 2 5 51 39 TF 'QF a 9 1:6., 4 G 4 52 40 z -zi T 1 L 1 1 1 E S 175 C-1 7 15 53 54 41 U T I L I T I ES 17 t--i I 1 .76 55 56 421 a 6-* Aq 0 571 43 F; 5 E34 58 UTI'LlTIES ,:_'t, i ..{, ^` u 71 1*fl tyl Lj 1; 11 c kl 53 El.-i-PH: J lj' E I 54 6'. 72 73 55 T E P IN m. U N, E 74 56 IF F-. L i"z i-- ". 1 1 f N Ei: J U P-4 i*-'- 75 * l. 76 57 5 i 44 45 LIT I L. I T 1+ ES 18,-- L T 1 1= 14 1 F-- 9 1 -4 33.... 2 5 ;2-9 59 60 46 . UT I L 1 1 E ,L- 0 1 55. 61 62 47 U TI I L IT I E 57 . 8 63 48 4 6 49 UT T. L i 1 ES il. 0 1 65 3 1. 66 050 67 511 Z Cl (-i- 2 A I F-,' 2 1 Ci 41 A 1 - 1 14 C' 68 69 ,:_'t, i ..{, ^` u 71 1*fl tyl Lj 1; 11 c kl 53 El.-i-PH: J lj' E I 54 6'. 72 73 55 T E P IN m. U N, E 74 56 IF F-. L i"z i-- ". 1 1 f N Ei: J U P-4 i*-'- 75 * l. 76 57 5 i : L E1rt1 :0tj 0 M E LE 1✓ ClFIt,.. IA L_ti, A 1.., FAr i l l E1J F" � LJkl g ;f w R A, e •-:' , ^, ` > , r'y ! . r "• , S _ Z ` D , l tr i. , !•'. r. S -, � • f y , C, t {� 0 � •-'- n 1 1.: � {�y F� 4 1 0 r f 1 �' I .+ •�' i� I !'�i 1'� A =' �' �� T E T Fi E �:..�' t.1 !=� C. F't :,, , : '[• . L Fi . r.: F', � L I �. F� L-: E ._ � F- �, � �, L-r L.. E „ f_I. , t +�, . -, 0 c_; i •,, i •. ,� iM • 'r'' , r 1 ;. . i `.� • }`•( .. L 7_! '1 - L.1. �.� Ar. «.' 1r •„ � o . - �., ', .: 4 •.d . n «! { 4 14 C_, t « , 0 7'' � 1 4 / ,+ S t . E T c�.i� F : � I� Fi � - E 1`I _ 1' I:..«« �a Y !� . � y - X 141 f wR 1 1C F» IY1 i t�d l�f ;~ � � 1 CIA :l P" 1=, f } - i 7 , 7* A I_Q `_. A.- --- 'j- �i�- -' { 53 -• r - - 71 1 {i � +�, {�, 1 { :; ° ? i_, c;� •7 ! r:! i ` + A F A F 1, FBI A � : i {�: ?- I 1 T E tw: 1 r µ. i. F= F F C Cl 11 ICI C E 1 •� i .. E R ; r , =14:: n ��t 7 72 55 x=' r }. E I « i r? 4 �:. I .1�J ►: C: (_i F": I 1 F 74 ,... t ( .« _ 1. { °? 4 _r 'f 010 4.7 4 0 � / 2 6 � .t AAA 0lW F I �.: F` F~ 0 .� L3 �: T ti 11. � :� f I I i'{I 75 57 .- _ .. 1 A _ _ t 4 '� . . :. F . Cl -' l - ...I «_ J _f _'(t ! : Y• : ..: I-•1 A 1••, 1 l W A .'.-t )�- 6 s .. t �. J' .I f. ! '�l '' 1 '�' ,t " , i f •. r r °' `` t � 8 . '1 ► 2 3 a 4 _ _. R I V END 0 F C:H1:" C: F :: � + I ��:�_� 1 T l �1 C: F-1 E C: F: E 5 6 1 ► 5 6 N U MB r R N��MI:'ER ELATE I''Ei;F{i�y _ _ X; E ' r ": 4=' i' is I - '� nl _ r. Itl I�i 1.J N T !% Cf10 LJ t}i T 7 8 E L_ E: F•'101\J � : J' U P �: J .+ :+ � 7 L, :. 10 T E I._ E P 1-'I 01 N E. • J U N E 1 ':f 9:3 4 14 ' ► 11 TEL- EF''F"iC z N J Li ICIF.:. 199 305- 0 9 15 12 1 9 '52 1 13 :. L' i TE L �: , F-I t_ 1�1 �:. J >~ lei E - -+ 7 °! 1 ..: _ . » '.• s 17 1 8 ► 14 / i JUNE , 1 ! w, �+ -+ s !, 5 1 9 15 _.. 1 6 T E. L- r_ PH I Cl N E- J U N E 1 ' -+ y :+ -, 418 A •,, ,_ 21 22 � ► 17 TiEL.EPF- 1Cl19E JUNE: 199 51 „44 23 18 17 19 .. • _ «. ! I` C L» 1~ 1", F-i •._ i d J L� 1' h — C _ t i :. _ , 25 2 6 20 - E F I-I I�► l lr J U fid E: .... « r 2 _ _. T F_ I_ E PH Iw; iii E J {_J 1`d t « 1 ':' ' =+ :_: 5 :3. u ; 0 29 30 � 23 IF LH. i— E P 1-1 N E. J � � 1'a E. 1 ': +':f 1" 5 0 31 �.� L) i� E. TELEPHONE 1 . 33 3 4 E i 27 F4 151 28 - - T E (_ E P ON E- J U I`d E 1 ' :' 93 7 0 37 38 29 TEi_.E.PHCjN J U N E• 19 5 '' {.t5 ;; !.. A 39 � 30 + E 1 _ - '-' 40 31 _ _ E {tF ;.. .. � .. U .» T1 L » E. . t — 1 7 8 41 42 0 32 w _ a T E L E P H O 1�1 4 L. I`~� E , ! _ t . Al 1. .. 7. 43 :....: _. : « — 44 34 — _ 1 E i -- E f- H �_� N E ! J U N E. 1 3 51 .4 4- - 45 46 1 35 T E.L.. E F-' F-1 +._+ lei E:. J U N E 19 `-+ 1 17 8 14 47 37 :. _.:. .. Cl t i� F L E F F I .. I�f E. J L I J Ir �., J... _ A t _ 50 38 / = .: E.L .EFH +NE _I1.t,E 1 .. 11 490 37 39 40 1. J. :7 1. -ic�j i 0 �' 13 : •�' M11��1tl A STATE TREASURER S -l'�, 1 E URI �.�E�F >..' LI C 1"� E: E.�; F' %��'AE'F -E 0�! iii1 '� +0r� A 00 53 54 � : L E1rt1 :0tj 0 M E LE 1✓ ClFIt,.. IA L_ti, A 1.., FAr i l l E1J F" � LJkl g ;f w R A, e •-:' , ^, ` > , r'y ! . r "• , S _ Z ` D , l tr i. , !•'. r. S -, � • f y , C, t {� 0 � •-'- n 1 1.: � {�y F� 4 1 0 r f 1 �' I .+ •�' i� I !'�i 1'� A =' �' �� T E T Fi E �:..�' t.1 !=� C. F't :,, , : '[• . L Fi . r.: F', � L I �. F� L-: E ._ � F- �, � �, L-r L.. E „ f_I. , t +�, . -, 0 c_; i •,, i •. ,� iM • 'r'' , r 1 ;. . i `.� • }`•( .. L 7_! '1 - L.1. �.� Ar. «.' 1r •„ � o . - �., ', .: 4 •.d . n «! { 4 14 C_, t « , 0 7'' � 1 4 / ,+ S t . E T c�.i� F : � I� Fi � - E 1`I _ 1' I:..«« �a Y !� . � y - X 141 f wR 1 1C F» IY1 i t�d l�f ;~ � � 1 CIA :l P" 1=, f } - i 7 , 7* A I_Q `_. A.- --- 'j- �i�- -' { 53 -• r - - 71 1 {i � +�, {�, 1 { :; ° ? i_, c;� •7 ! r:! i ` + A F A F 1, FBI A � : i {�: ?- I 1 T E tw: 1 r µ. i. F= F F C Cl 11 ICI C E 1 •� i .. E R ; r , =14:: n ��t 7 72 55 x=' r }. E I « i r? 4 �:. I .1�J ►: C: (_i F": I 1 F 74 ,... t ( .« _ 1. { °? 4 _r 'f 010 4.7 4 0 � / 2 6 � .t AAA 0lW F I �.: F` F~ 0 .� L3 �: T ti 11. � :� f I I i'{I 75 57 .- _ .. 1 A _ _ t 4 '� . . :. F . Cl -' l - ...I «_ J _f _'(t ! : Y• : ..: I-•1 A 1••, 1 l W A .'.-t )�- r y I I 0 F 11 AIF L E' W f_1 D_ P iUCHR1 8 vc X� I M -- ----- '496GHER�4_41i�GK. Q T I I;i a4 r:1 ig 2 0 4 09 15 0 A_2 "T ' 6'. A R N A L S AUTO cS'ERVICE REP A& MA I NT /VEH I C.1-E e - ..:' 8 3 7 .57 401 3 30 3 4 6 6 411 4 4 VGHGHER� C H E Cl- V E bl'_D R- C H E K" VENDOR I T I':- I', - 1 E 1*4 C H E C: K 5 6 07 5 1%4 U M L-3 E IR N U lvi BIE R DAT E t--� tyl E - D E S ��J I F-A T 'Y u"IN A lyl 0 U 1-4 T A M A U 11 T 7 6 451 461 35 104. 7 36 1 1 60 0 7 3 8 LEGAL F I S C: AL A J= F_ ;j S CA J= 1 li A. 5 0 0 -.0 47 48 • 9 ff, 0 7 38 LJ P H 3. ti L E A L. F T S C ArL 10 51 8 39 !3 U P PL L I ES. EQUIPMENT 2 1 0 7 S a C4 52 40 M A 1 N T E iq A 14 M ATE 1 A 6 8 69 9 1 0 54 12 41 StUPPLIES J A N I f 0 1 _( I A L I L_ 13 5 U, 8 L 13 0 11 56 42 15 P A g J4 y Rij. 'W ARij j4.Q WgE 1JRP6 1 ES G 6 16 ;4 57 43 . 16 S LJ PP L I E 3 V E H I C Li 4.. 74 58 E 44 17 SUPPLf E--' VEH I QLt_ 13 _ 59 . � � 8 4 7 1 45 18 14 0 4 6 0 0 Ao" 0 4 0 OL & 9 A I R-S 1, iAL` FIAGELR RE[-41"11' L A IR' T I M E 5 S 7.1 - E lk! A W i E 11*1 AT R I L lyl A I I A T 19 20 61 62 15 P A G - 14 j C. E F Fj j L4 L 94 b A, 61 63 16 FA Ej E R 'Ei V I C E 1�'► R ,JULY 5 1' S 3 64 21 22 49 10 4 07 ;':11 "S 11 9 BENSOki NN I E_ L 'U N D FEE 0 0 65 40 QQ 66 A. 48 23 18 67 24 25 19 1 0 4 1 0 0 7 6 5) 3 1; RICAN FA S TE. N :p� U p P . I I E ,.� V EH I C L E 52 26 20 I.- A, 0 0 3 r 50 70 MAINTEl',.JANCE MATERIAL 6:. 0.+ . 27 21 71 1 -4 T Ei N A H G E M A 4: E R 1 A 1= 1 4 1 9 9 28 - 72 73 55 29 74 22 10 47 :3 7' 1 1 9 F! R F" • R. C', H F' '; [:'A* N 0 H E I N C BE'T' 1) R 17- R A A i- S E VA6' 1 C I S °: `:; ti... q 0 0 0 30 23 1 0 4 t" 42' 24 0 1 0 0 7 J! 2,* 6' A 9 A 11 E R' 11: A 11 L I I*%J E N S U F P L Y R U% R 1\1 TA L f 0 R i UNE 98 A, 52 9 .52 31 32 25 10 4 C) . 0 4'7: 0_ J I- I -. . ANDERSU N E VE_ RLE T T. A C: NS -1 LT I I 1V p sg 133 34 26 3 5 271 4 A _o A c_; 7:3 - IN 0 1 1k I C. 19 7 36 13 '7 1 r:1 ig 29 1046,5 0 4 09 15 0 A_2 "T ' 6'. A R N A L S AUTO cS'ERVICE REP A& MA I NT /VEH I C.1-E e - ..:' 8 3 7 .57 401 30 4 6 6 411 31 42 32 10 66 33 041 )0 07 J_'LD I r �ARN A V I D r T U IT 10 N E I M I-D. H . jq j F _ j � j T H 1 G 1* .4 431 'i�68 2 4 44i 34 451 461 35 104. 7 36 1 1 60 0 7 3 -All 11' V.' E L. L Y P . A . BANN Iu LEGAL F I S C: AL A J= F_ ;j S CA J= 1 li A. 5 0 0 -.0 47 48 37 L E G L F SCAL ff, 0 49 50 38 L E A L. F T S C ArL z 5 51 39 'GAL 9 F 12GA6 6 E S a C4 52 40 E, A 1-4 lk.J I G A 1*4 K E L L. "Y' "31 6 6 A. 6 C) 9 1 0 54 41 55 56 42 W P A g J4 y Rij. 'W ARij j4.Q WgE 1JRP6 1 ES G 6 16 ;4 57 43 . S LJ PP L I E 3 V E H I C Li 4.. 74 58 0 44 SUPPLf E--' VEH I QLt_ . t' t. � fs t :f , _ 59 . � � 8 4 7 1 45 60 46 4 0 7' 0 10 C 9 0 A C. cl N i", I f) U T - E lk! A W i E 11*1 AT R I L lyl A I I A T 4 5 0 0 61 62 047 V1 I A I NI T 1E. I I A N E iii 'A TE 1 M L b A, 61 63 4 8 64 49 10 4 07 ;':11 "S 11 9 BENSOki NN I E_ L 'U N D FEE 0 0 65 40 QQ 66 50 67 RL 1 14 IA� A M ig 6 8 52 R F- U kI V A L. LE YF I I.- A, 0 0 3 r 50 70 53 71 1 -4 L4 W y - 72 73 55 74 0 10 47 :3 7' 1 1 9 F! R F" • R. C', H F' '; [:'A* N 0 H E I N C BE'T' 1) R 17- R A A i- S E VA6' 1 C I S °: `:; ti... q 0 0 0 75 57 176 r:1 ig i 1 ' 1 °' 10 110470 07/26/9 �! i , � E A N C 1 T E •)0 i:. �� h �_� � :� iiii1.1C:H 39 39 C IT Y 0 �' 11AF' D 40 FOR 1�' ! R * r� D 0 » r . .. :::. a y ,'- •, t.. .. ... 1 � 0 4 +...= t r• , t .' . : jf�'') 7 �• 1„ 3. �: ) � t_ �� 7 t�' :::_ .... 2 { ` �y � O FF' F t^ !J- }�+ :w U. 7 1 • 1.:. E 2 1 .,, • I [ .. 1 C i..• :. .; - � � 1t 1 1 .. .� A :. .. • • ♦ n . . .. ' 4Z 2 3 4 t: H EC 1- V E' 1�1 �� �`) �' C: H E ��: t:: 'd �.1�1 ±) i. Fi 1 7 E i'�l T ..t �: l'! c Fl 5 6 N U ltl i E R t�l i t 1' +1 J_ : �,< ,�`: l E 1' =! �'�. to F l�� C:: ; C 4 1: P T 1 0 tai A M i - It i NT A 110 U 1 T 7 8 1 ;� r t� � 1 �:. r », , r ) f. ( ,f� �, t') � :f 26/ . •� -� j : , L�:L� � � L.AR� Y RE 1` 11� F f�l t 1 , ! GAM 1 6-50 1 6 u r (.� �o �'r.. �1.1ND Ttip:tIra_. G� M[w 4 7.Oc i... 1 n _ 6 .. " 4 4 15 _ - - PORTABLE TOILETS FOR PARKS ` - - 9 ° ` - 13 • 1 0 '-- _ �, ,. 7 S " 14 10 i 4.7 0 1 150 0 l' ;2' 6" I ':t 3 B O H L , J 0 t-1 [%l !- U 1: .0 T i.. :�.::. _, :, T 1~ L. E � ::. — ye f�• — rte. t`i i"` — — 17 ,. .. t "} :: ..:..» _. , t .�. x- »; ',. t • —) ,:.�� .,-, I. ./ t `7' . ��..r� l f 3 , r � R A I�::. R A ,� A N � N r :! i 1' f 1... 1 VE H IC L E � t:. a _ 0 : . • •' 4 . r t_) 53 54 .. ..... ---- _ --- --- --- T L L L Pfl�_.)Ni_ " _. :' 1 55 'j' ": - 'T� ' 104 7,_ 0 :!t�, - {t�0. 07 /� r f . _ GRF UEhIJS HARDWARE `J u 1"'L 1 !i 3 t: QU 1: PM1• !�!T � � 23 I n 4 24 t .�. c Pt -, t. #.'• ^¢ tiT /tw =l: �� - , . tt.1 t.E ,! S�1 >: - ME 1'J! 1 • ? - 1 1 1 .� } � E 4., _ n. n. ., �. 2 6 :• 60 5 L ,' % - - 2 1 29 30 3 !tlA T NTEN��ttlC:E 1�1A'T'Er -' T AL '� ' 2 ` 4 n 4 �") `• 1 : _� : �, 7 /y +_•/ .__ 31 _� [� V ) 1 t R n F ;'l T I L N � _. f % I -•• : f / .- () r) 4 n f 1 Cl - ,1 , - _ n - = - - , -, ' 32 . _. _. '. ... � �� { ff11 }'((L � .= 1 � 6r {� •! • �1 n P A Y N E l 'I ! � 1 / 1 t - tlA . r ! 1 �. r to T 1�l,At�1�.1.., 7Et�I► L •- 33 35 .. - .. , ... .: - :.i � - ! 4 e w _fi' �.. .. w .- r... .. .. ;... ..[ 2. .. J_..� {.. .f .. �::: -. ,.. .. :: �:: [�: .:fit:. €_:.:_�. ... ..:. ... .- : .. . 1 z , . . - --- - ... n .. .. ..-. 1 ' 1 °' 10 110470 07/26/9 �! i , � E A N C 1 T E } V E H 11. C : L E t L !_ j_i ' C - i:. �� h �_� � :� t: L a ` ' 39 39 40 1 ». - .. 1 ),,,f . .. 1 ::: �, ? �' t,_• -. .: » r . .. :::. a y ,'- •, t.. .. ... 1 � 0 4 +...= t r• , t .' . : jf�'') 7 �• 1„ 3. �: ) � t_ �� 7 t�' :::_ .... :; . i 1 t f `/••uy t } • � . 4 f ••tf t { ( t pp .. C .0 ' 1~ � . / �' : � i U R � 1,.{ q : 4'; F t: [. ti 7..:. i..l �wy :.L.f 1 t „i I E. ::.: .. .: { ` �y � O FF' F t^ !J- }�+ :w U. 7 1 • 1.:. E 2 1 .,, • I [ .. 1 C i..• :. .; - � � 1t 1 1 .. .� A :. .. • • ♦ n . . .. ' 4Z 2 y :'. : ,• J•+ , .=4 44 .• ... t: ...: _. •_. , w .,mow• � T 1 R., 1 5 1.0405 1105 07/, :'i� =�'':�:r. C:A R R I Z A1.- .E`w; f'A�lL. �'r.. �1.1ND Ttip:tIra_. G� M[w 4 7.Oc i... 1 n _ 6 48 • 1 0 '-- _ �, ,. 7 S r. so T 1~ L. E _ » _ 52 0 T E L E 1`' H '..j N E. • •' 4 . r t_) 53 54 1 T L L L Pfl�_.)Ni_ :' 1 55 n 4 • �. t.. f.. E �' l" � '•11~, .) f s , ;:�' » _ •.f •»,• �:. n =.il _• 59 :• 60 5 6 �` , r{ 1 487 4) : f = t 1.� •1_ � �") `• 1 : _� : �, 7 /y +_•/ .__ f CENTER '—. �_ 1 i • r rt r. �.3 L ' 1 l ,_•ENs E F R F_•,•.ER,..• •: )E�c _� [� V ) 1 t R n F ;'l T I L N � _. f % I -•• : f / .- () r) 4 n f 1 Cl 62 ' � �� { ff11 }'((L � .= 1 � 6r {� •! • �1 n P A Y N E l 'I ! � 1 / 1 f - ' :, r ..i 54.00 63 .s - - ; • RD Q TR. PA Y )1 f.11 '1' _ `v 'j• 7 1. / 30 "1 54 06 - � 66 .o J f t"{ 1 Y �_ U +"� �' 1� t" %):) ! 1 4-.. 1 r• / 1 '.t (` / .. a t i ` 1 �- t 1 _ » fl J . 67 QT R �. », _ 68 )2 . - (fit i.a! i1 a 1 I 1�! L N • ., t / 1 _ -,/30 i. i n _ " L n _ 69 i3 •' •` • _••. •• r , -_ i 'T =•' 7 1 72 )4 , 1�1 f_I ..• _ ...,. 4'2 ,�-, r-= `.} •' �^� '�•• ' - ' G 611 r • � _ , _ . . ` 21 - _ 73 35 "t 74 ' 56 t-, ,� t1. ,.,_ .� .. t� 1, 5 0 ; •1 0 t� E �. ,: ,�; •�, t�t 7' . ; •� / '1 : i " t »� { t t» 1 '� t ,. ) - C ; 0 1~111 � :� : r T i.1 t�1 t E ��� � . 1 r� A t�l �f r is ;1~i � )� . �. � 1'�l . -� Y ":. y , • �..• t i=i 1: t' F�. T 1.: � 11 �t T 1 � ! U I �� ) • 1 1yl :.- i ,1 � 1 t :L �' - n 7 " . .1. 4 3 .W 1 .. •,,) 75 ") i7 • _• ; f � ..0:1 #40 30 V Cj U C': H RE k3i o G A 4 4_j F.. r.1TY OF 4 FA G E 8 O ' T 4 32 2 2 .0 7*:/ 2 d. D C T A P H 0 1 E D I C: T A P H Li N E' C 0 R F Q R A' I Q N 7 1 �• :7 1 0 4 4 33 3 4 3 VOW C., 1:4 E R 4 34 0 5 0 0 5 D 0 N R E R V I CE C 0 1 N C C H i':-� C'K V EIN D Ci R- C. I-1 E. C. i V E 1`J D Of I T E M I T E i'll C: H f*,* 5 N, U fit i R 1'-4 U I'l i= D A T E V.-I, A 111 E It = T ION A M C, U NT A il Ci U N T 7 6 4 36 • Q W L Id L. PURCHASE OF IC FORMS B 7 M90 1 15 01 0 -4 C F -'E R (01 RE1 CIRM E N G N E I Ne' C 0 14 C FN"E 'r E F"Cl R 11 EN G I I*%J 1q. a,.• r 1 8 4 0.0 9 4::. 0 0 U 08 8 1 5 0 3 E I LERTSON C, R I FU N D, V A L. 1_1::� Y A R )0 0 Q 39 9 40 4 9 G ci ■ c i_! 1 11 C. 'I E IM, N 11 A 1 1 TERI L. INI A I I" I A L L:. 3 3.-Y 7' 4- 3 7 4 41 10 Oil 0 4'.-1 Z 17 5 0 7 2 61 9 CLJ L V E R f R K r_ r - R 1:7 U N F E!"' 0 15 If if 12 44 1. 0 (5, C) ti 1 15 F M F'R A "i T A L. 0 Iq N C F'U!',ID PMT f 0 R • L R' N G-i C U 11 C: T F `4 13 1 49 170 1. -7 CU RT I S I Q 0 C) PURCHASE OF ENVELOPES if 014 46 C' "t-ECI-I -SERVICE C. 0 R P R F! A I R tit A 1 NT V E 111 C L E •. .37 5. 15 47 48 A 114'; R A C;T 9 W A, L. ISERV i Cogs 4 1 . 5' _ 2( 49 10507 1 4!�4 i4, 119 0 E' U F' P I E S V E H I L E 6 J:� I f 2' 16 51 2,' 017 .1. 4 5 1801 D 00 0 .— ► .)3 DALEY F; A -r J U N E 93 PL ► U1118 I N G 11, IS P E C. C F ION 1 70 4 oO 2. 2j 18 P R C', C-*j A lyl 'Si 1.-)' 4 . 89 4 P L W 4�.% 1 W T Q! 1 4 2! 19 55 -L U tfl)3 I I' G J. U N E 93r F. -4 S P 2 1 0 . 0 Q 2( 20 40 56 0 b 1 0 r,71 8 Cf, A 7' Li Ji tj I 9 3 P L U 11 F.' I I'' NSF,-- • C r Ek ' T 1 0 N ilk Ivl A N E N 1',1 CE 11 A R f L Z 4 "T 8 n 1 21 21 22 1 0 4 9 18 1 *8. 0 0 0 'T DAV I ES W A _I*'E R E C1 LJ I N 1-4 "1" HYDRAi*-,,IT F L A G S 1 9 7' 0 q 00 1 g 9 T 0 00 31 23 3 3: 24 2; 6 i 1 P A V.;r 3 25 K E Y S 0 3 26 E X H A 11 LOC'K- - 49 5 3 3 27 _ c% �4 A 41 1_ 3 28 K' E S 3 4 1 4 74 3 30 o G A 4 4_j F.. V 9 14 A W Q i� 4 31 4 32 1 0 4 P9 ";'0 0 3 0 0 .0 7*:/ 2 d. D C T A P H 0 1 E D I C: T A P H Li N E' C 0 R F Q R A' I Q N 7 1 �• :7 1 0 4 4 33 4 34 0 5 0 0 0 7'/'--" 6 5 D 0 N R E R V I CE C 0 1 N C A I R tit 1 W B L I" G G R 0 U N D S RE[ A 1 2 4 5 7 35 4 4 36 • Q W L Id L. PURCHASE OF IC FORMS 4 37 (A 3 8 1 5 0 3 E I LERTSON C, R I FU N D, V A L. 1_1::� Y A R )0 0 Q 39 40 ci ■ c i_! 1 11 C. 'I E IM, N 11 A 1 1 TERI L. INI A I I" I A L L:. 3 3.-Y 7' 4- 3 7 4 41 2 43 44 1. 0 (5, C) ti 1 15 F M F'R A "i T A L. 0 Iq N C F'U!',ID PMT f 0 R • L R' N G-i C U 11 C: T F `4 85 -0 7' 70. 45 46 C' "t-ECI-I -SERVICE C. 0 R P R F! A I R tit A 1 NT V E 111 C L E •. .37 5. 40 47 48 F�' I- P A 11: 111 5 4 .00 4 1 . 5' _ 49 10507 7' Q 0 0 7 L E X.!:'B- I E F I P E I 00 1 E' U F' P I E S V E H I L E 6 J:� I f 50 51 J w E V 6 52 P R C', C-*j A lyl 'Si 1.-)' 4 . 89 4 53 54 P ki I 55 40 56 0 b 1 0 r,71 8 Cf, A 7' Li F J-3 V A L L E '3 y i%_31T 1:-: 111 s ilk Ivl A N E N 1',1 CE 11 A R f L 4 "T 8 n 1 G VCIUC:1- 1 R1*-_'. G C: I T OF V' ref' ..I.: ��I(:sl�►):! r r. f= ';�tait. `:f 16 " — . -, i r f"s , . 6 F-- t"' t r• E 1 ,� t i ;_; r , r : "f i'! I:..! f � ter ,:. " .: .. 1 .. A .. _ _. 2 68 51 U 1*1 1 F i 11.., C L. E �41�1 T 1 � .., -9 4 3 4 52 1='' R 0 Ci R l 1 S IT P L. I L ��� �'i �: is } t "} 141 1- !.. ! ,W._ FOR' R •.# 1.1 I 1 E 70 5 4 C• H E C'• 1 •. V Ell D I_! F'. C. H IE C:1- V L-.N D {_! '; I T'IE'. 1'! I T E lyl t • H EC 6 5 -_, 111411T }-,1':8 :; . _� - - NU!1B'E". DA� E t t l! F�' ; C:: i t ' T T. ► =+ l�l ,t�,. Iy1 0 U 1't� . r�. ! }1 ��+ U r i T 7 a 73 6 �:: . „ •-, ,_, 6 ! t�� t ) ]� r � � "f "� � 1� 7� �� 2 � :1. I.. _! 2 . .. .J. .. 4 ” ,..: .1 1 .. :..1.. - ' =' }"r. 75 9 . . .`.. } i_} F i :s E M I ! �1 � � �+ F, _, . ;•.. '>,! +"• a ty i ..�. : •Mr ')- f 1 1 1 1 � t R T HE E r t .' � : 1 "' � J. _ 1 1 . t L... A , t I a i r ... �fr:i .00 � � � � � �f ref 10 8 _ 4..y 11 t } ! �...� — c� 7 :. - 9 8 . . .; � � � 1 _ 1 N Ir � � 1� • ;. a � 12 2 1 .. r , g ._ E , _ r _ -•= r . �•-• 29 10 �, 0 ; � -, c a 0 0 � : f i. ' "' � t:..1: +_1 N 1 � I�l L. L. �. s� i — ,�'! .� 1"'ti ,:. •(� ,r { "' �_} �1• i 3 Q 14 r r. t _ ,... 16 " — . -, i r f"s , . 6 F-- t"' t r• E 1 ,� t i ;_; r , r : "f i'! I:..! f � ter ,:. " .: .. 1 .. A .. _ _. 13 68 51 U 1*1 1 F i 11.., C L. E �41�1 T 1 � .., -9 4 52 1='' R 0 Ci R l 1 S IT P L. I L ��� �'i �: is } t "} 141 1- !.. ! ,W._ FOR' R •.# 1.1 I 1 E 70 53 1 1. 5 Q 0 I�� I ? „ i�; { i 71 • 0 P _ a _ 21 16 17 72 54 N A T find T A P R T ! !_+ N 1 - 11 1 L r_, 1 1 i_ti 6 t,;. fi f {_t 22 23 73 55 �:: . „ •-, ,_, 6 ! t�� t ) ]� r � � "f "� � 1� 7� �� 2 � :1. I.. _! 2 . .. .J. .. 4 ” ,..: .1 1 .. :..1.. - �...... �. � � .1 .1 _ ' =' }"r. 75 f' 18 -. 9 s , E H r D W A. R E t a . ,._ a. ,_ .. 25 4..y t } ! �...� -, t`) Z 1 c` 0 . ." c� 7 :. - 9 8 . . .; � � � 1 _ 1 N Ir � � 1� • ;. a � ,; . 27 , 2 2 1 ,. 29 22 1051 t` , �, 0 ; � -, c a 0 0 � : f i. ' "' U L. I~.1�1 W +_+ O D T N k,1... E 1� 0 01.1 J U 1�1 E f t f C L. t ~ R R L 1`a T r� L. �_z. 1�( ?� T ER _ r '_! .15 r _ Q 15 23 32 33 .. T, f t _ " ,�. - REF !1 A �'� K 1'! ._ ..• T. .• f L a . .'lf + _ i 34 mss 26 27 w: � r . _ _ .. _ ..,� 9 _ _ 36 3 _ _ it .. 37 28 29 051 -f �; 07 r;:6 "r9;�, rRlj *.ER! � F'f�� {.�1�r� EQ��Ir✓�MENT� SUF1"'L.IES - V� HICL.�: ; -a � ���' :_'�� ,r��� 39 40 30 41 31 ..� , C "i ., 1h� • t1 r. t} .," _.� t t.= •..: J7�� r .1s.� .i. IE . t� _�'1-IET � C 43 2 C 32 ;:. 44 33 r F r- W N D .-T-14 34 R E U lI D V r'! 1._ L 1- `f 1- A .1. R c: T . 0 0 5 4 „ 0 E l 46 47 35 36 - 37 38 EN 1) E . I : �" r_ S 51 3 _ :.. 53 40 1. t_) r _ }1 {_} 1 i {) t_) r �: r:, r ': f '� H E as irl '� Fi r'.1'� ; t� L 1 11 t. T T - All i TOR �1! 1.. S L.1 F 1<' %_. I E r J _ : _ .:: -; -! f - r•••r 54 41 ' U r• r r „ r I MEN ' L. 1.._ 1 . +J L7 J. P 1 1 �_ 1� • 1 �' , 75 , � �.: A ..� 1� �_: � fi L.. 55 1 1 L ,..� 56 42 57 43 - 3 f"'. r .r, f. , � 0 " � � C_ (�- �� ICI Cf � �. � i "1 1� 1 1 L. l"T �Y lr 1 a... _ 45 00 0 58 59 1 44 60 04 L-r 65 49 " — . _ 67 50 ,� t i ;_; r , r : "f i'! I:..! f � ter ,:. " .: �•• z i" r��, , 1 1 i .+ a_. 1't ... _1 "' f L. t 1 .. A .. _ _. : 68 51 _ , _.. 64 _. _ 52 1='' R 0 Ci R l 1 S IT P L. I L ��� �'i �: is } t "} 70 53 F' i-!: +_+ ! 1 A !y1 ; ; U 1'"' P 1_ 1 E- ;_; 1. 5 Q 0 I�� I ? „ i�; { i 71 72 54 73 55 �:: . „ •-, ,_, 6 ! t�� t ) ]� r � � "f "� � 1� 7� �� 2 � :1. I.. _! 2 . .. .J. .. 4 ” ,..: .1 1 .. :..1.. - �...... �. � � .1 .1 _ ' =' }"r. 75 f' (�� .a. 76 57 FA GE I } 8 ._ ._ �r ,-. i i E ik .. -- G i G r T E Fi l h ; _ E ', tmr E" •� 1. 0 D 0 7' +,! 2 ® 2 3 4 4 C F "! t:.. C. !•;, "v l:. !\I to #_t f; C: N E. i : r�:. 'u E:. N f � 0 R' 1 1 t:.1 ! .•. 1 -f E 11 H E C: 6 8 6 7 _, -'� :� -t ,W, 1 �l +l i:;t !�! ;,, E: ! ! �,, M T E L. E H M I F 6 9 8 l" :�' P`i ! a., +3: 1 1 , !`°•! C E n ! E #, U I r ! l lam. 1'1! j 12' _..+_. ;, __ _ w ;. 13 y - - -�— 9 Oil 10 4 ! '1 i? ? ��+ :�� - - _ - ,.l 11" F I !-' F� 11 t! C - _ • 1' : �� 'C' L F I _ • ,_, ,-. �. _ . 14 �« w _, . 16 17 12 _ .• 1 F» 0 18 10 14 " - -. 20 15 i 44 H F _ r� D 4 �. .: �. _ w _ 21 44 N HE 17 : •, : -.:.. - '- .- ;; h:: l E F F. F; A tai !'a k:.�_ ... �_ - , • .� ... 0 0 2,1 24 18 19 tl.E... b__ti _ _ t },,� y # # F ,,. �f F h ! F !., I J 2E 2. 20 U 1= F' L• E > I i t.. w 'FY _ UP p6 E G 1 4 a • 21 23 10 5 =;6, 4 ' { + -� { � it : �:.F_tI:.� �:,H A si HLE 1 I c: r .. ' } F - F r 1 . ., I"; ,fit t l :.� Li F' F` L• I E � .• ., 1 ' "� 0 rr 1.0 _ 31 3, 24 25 .r �.., {ry - I R S 1M 2 31 27 C - 4 - 4-W j 28 29 - : -, r -, - - - - ,; _ t- .. ' , - -. _ } 7 / �. r_+ ' -a • ,:, �. l G �' L k 1�� l�� E U E H I �. L E A � L _ 1> A 1 ! _ E .1 1 w _ 3 - 4 1 4 3 30 31 C) Ei. 9, 4 C& 70 0 0 7 19 3 T.. - - a . � : . .0 N S E N �-�.a�� M A 111"' /VEHI L . 32 _ 4 33 _ , . . ,. A S 4 34 -— - _ G _ —_ ;SIB _!_1,I M P F'L.E 1'!L C I i_tD REVIE I I - 1 ' $ .00 4 35 H, I'' L �� I i \lG -� ,.5 .:;r � 7 �; w ;�I 4 4 36 7 :. —. 1 - - -. tj _ r-•. �••. ��:: .._ — , r_. � , T I� i X41 -�[ C 1~ 1�! A T E R 1 A L :E 4 38 39 _ 4 Q G A B 4 0 a 1 10 54; ; ,-: 5 „}i r t0 -} _ �.:,, {.) t % �: � +% � r. {', lt1 a Il . . !L a F' � ,..t F C L:` A L. L. T E Y� lei R E I,` T 4.. fi h; A C I i N - ,• - 4 Z w {_t 0 1 1% Cv- ' `• I a2 43 Q.4 W A - �� 1:t .�� �t 1 i I i�! 1. ,.� t�t F ' t• �. � � L. L, T lr .. ! `! Fi !”. 1 �W , 44 1 _� 45 40944 +� - r r 47 5 ::� t ^s E T ;i f.} 1 _I T .; - i) t f �. r.:+ % ''` - t 1 .'- - U :l F' f�1 E M J �.: tit U E E N E tit !� 1 r _. ,. ,.... ,� 1t ,... E L� �! I F' L. y �. �..� � �• 1~. L=. c r 49 i�) I i : ; , t�} 1 '' , (i_y { } l` tM 1�, /` ;l . !; r �`� lyl �..t I »i ) p �:i �, fi t E �.21'�1 � } V A L. L- E Y F" Ft ®50 WE 4 - r f •, •, , r• �,: F r r _. , F 14 1 Q _ i 53 i _ } �.; : ; ; { ;::� . 1. :r l�) l f I_t t' i c: �::• / ' J �, it! ,r� •:.r �1(: � G R`. �` R T ,,! i�. i :. F' f�. ! �: lYi L: a �_ F i L �' !yl F �`�! ! {.} :: . ' ! - =.'t :. y l.) •_ r. . 54 55 t; • t I i :� I ` i {,) t, ( } ; r f °' :+ t : � � U 1� Lt �! • �`�! Y t I f i' "' 1"` �.. `.' L ► i t L �! +� 56 t,t (.) , r:. r '�l I,.i T, H E __ _ _ 17 1 5 3 C' 0 0 07 2 6 `9 ` 3 M E N A R DS J— M A I N TE 11 A N C E- M A T E R' I P1, L. 12" t-- 1) D M il, '' L.' -� " j..7 M . 1 — 6 K, —t .1 i" AGE I . 1 1 1 Y8 Q, w T P, 14 WT 1p. M A 1 N TE ki A iq C: E 11 A E7 R .1 A L 19 T K I r- IF- C) R` PE iy 1. C D (..)7 42 14 A I hi T W A 41 C lyl A I F-.- R 1 .4 1 2 2 0 b b 4. 5 0 "i..(} (Y r i 21 tr M E. NARDS . -A I N T E N A N C. E [fl A TE .. M i RtAL f ti ._s l . . . . . 21 44 3 3 59 22 lyl FS 1. NT E N A N C E lyl A -F I--- R I A L 4 2 4 4 i4 C-414 P--'R . . :,* C H E CJ V i-:I'J D C, R C: H E C: I V L. 1\1 D ;-1 R E M C H C: K 5 6 5 N U M E), E R N U M L-.'E R D A TE 0 I] I P T 10 W A V! 0 U HT A MI Ci Ul T 7 6 .0 0 27 F 7 28 10556 SALE" TA` ` `� n 'w' a 9 10 SUPPLIES JAI,•1TORIAL =, 7 2- 9 -T 4 Q hi i r r 1 12 10 13 . 11 I 0!'-j 5 0 5 2 0 0 57 0 7 /2'. 6 2-1 M C'. Ef 0 W L-1 U G H GA R Y REFUND 'I'Vi I N S ri A PI E 13 5 1 4 15 12 16 13 1. O!ff!s, 6 2-'0 4.8 9: 0 7 27:- IS 51.23. M(.: G -i H CO N 8 T R U C T1 0 N C 0 U C :-1: PC PROGI-3ESS F: 11 T F 0 R COM TTR lyl G.11 -f I el. 64-7 0:6- 1.4 64 7 0 17 18 14 19 15 W51� FE 1,4 2 i; A 11 f =- 4. 1 w 2 C. I' iL-W F. 9 1- 411 i 2-- T-2. A C; K W R Ai= A i @ I W @ :� 1 1; 1 20 16 --.6 11-zl - 21 221 17 1. 055 5 3 C' 0 0 07 2 6 `9 ` 3 M E N A R DS J— M A I N TE 11 A N C E- M A T E R' I P1, L. 12" • 40 18 3 1 50 S T M S Q, w T P, 14 WT 1p. M A 1 N TE ki A iq C: E 11 A E7 R .1 A L 19 T K I r- 55 42 14 A I hi T W A 41 C lyl A I F-.- R 1 .4 1 20 0 b b 4. 5 0 "i..(} (Y r i 21 tr M E. NARDS . -A I N T E N A N C. E [fl A TE .. M i RtAL f ti ._s l . . . . . 21 44 M A]* N Tt'";'. N A N C E- MATEF" I AL E - Q Lj 112 Dd r.-I 1 59 22 lyl FS 1. NT E N A N C E lyl A -F I--- R I A L 4 2 '9 4 a 4 1 23 24 5 P-i C�) 25 0 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS FOR CITY D 26 .0 0 27 F 28 10556 540180 0 _7 6 5' 3 M I D W E SJ* S I •R L. N St E R V C E S .1 R E 14- -R E PA 1 R 2 51117' 4 6 7 n 4 • I I t I I I V In 54 5 4. 3 4 V E I i I C L. 1-_ ALLOWANCE.: F-1 i-1 A r . B C.' A C H A R C1 E S 300 0 0 10 .00 37 38 39 -0 ma rx .1 f ft %r f W ff, 0 0 1 L E T PE 11 • S. I N G;. A •I R '-3, 1: N T V E KI C L E �o t M I-- R`G L Iq C Y SY 1 05 5 0 1 0 0 4 49 5 0 51 52 • 40 EJ-,I A kl C E MATER 1 A L 1 056 1 570090 0 7 /Z 6 9 I*fi 0 G R E hl BROS. 1!'1 A I N1 T LE "I" 3 1 50 S T M S 53 54 41 M A 1 N TE ki A iq C: E 11 A E7 R .1 A L 10 ri r ct T K I r- 55 42 14 A I hi T W A 41 C lyl A I F-.- R 1 .4 1 56 431, E A I wr E 11 A IV lyl ATE R L M \ 2 . . . 57 58 44 M A]* N Tt'";'. N A N C E- MATEF" I AL 5 1:. 1 59 451, 60 531 r= ''t 0 C 0 71 J. OF, * 5 5 15 11 FL.S C 0 Mirli U N I T Y 0 L. L E G E T U 01%1 C E f-; T F 1:_ E F0 R Ci f- F -Ir C i Vx-- 54 72 73 55 4 VEH CLE 1 4' .99, �93 tfi.LJ N I C I L I -T I-- 1-b J. 05 -610-100 0 7 2:1 S C 0 74 56 75 571 76 C! ri Q hi T r- f-01A P 1 11 T- P. P. -q 0 7 2 M C", G f N U C A R T C 0 1-,1 C: IR E T E .. I'll A 1 NIT E N A N C'E M AT E f` I A L C 0 I\! C R E "F E 2.03 8 a 570 100 1.0563. 5 07/Z6/9 M C R -E SY S T M S S U F, T L" E S OFF 1 CE 84. -- - r-- A 7 .1 s1 t 10 ri r ct T K I r- I I" A I 1 h, ri T n- 4 531 r= ''t 0 C 0 71 J. OF, * 5 5 15 11 FL.S C 0 Mirli U N I T Y 0 L. L E G E T U 01%1 C E f-; T F 1:_ E F0 R Ci f- F -Ir C i Vx-- 54 72 73 55 4 VEH CLE 1 4' .99, �93 tfi.LJ N I C I L I -T I-- 1-b J. 05 -610-100 0 7 2:1 S C 0 74 56 75 571 76 C! ri Q hi T r- f-01A P 1 11 T- P. P. -q 23 V F I I J H R E" G 0 7' IL" 6 9 N Cl f T H W E F L E WI 0 0 D CITY llAl- A ! j4 E ....; ;. 4 M. . . 1 0 P AG E 1 2_ Y81 a. . ..... 31 24 in v n 4 F 0 R Pit CI D 0 7 2 25 026 10 57 6 -1�1 6 0 07 6 0 F U '3 2 7 _ F-4 C 31 3! 13( 27 28 4 3 4 • A R W A 'I; i C' AR VJ A. S H n_ T 31 29 V E I' -Q D CI F"" -1" E M I E 11 Ar4fj U 5 H E K 6 M Cl U N T 7 G 1 -1 E R FI E C V El -A D R* C • 5 30 31 N U [71 E E R 1-4 U lYll BLE R DATE E 1--,' 'A i`f 1 E D E S' C R I F"T 1 0 N r7l i ------ C A R: W A S H 6 7 4 1 27 C Q U T F M E 1 E. :, 5 -5 sm. 9 55 Q c 101 it 4 32 8 12 9 6 2 6 9 H W 1 D F= A 9?4 I= R T f HG' F C4 R G f G ERV Li AG. ST T_ Y N u I i I -7 1 1 14 Q H 1 Sl F - (1: 1 A L EVE N 0 R D E 4 T i U L 13 1 • 11 0 1. 0 5 6 4 0 E L S C-I N C ARCD L. M E D Ij r - I i- 1 %1 F E •111 B I.) RS' E lyl E 1-%Ff .50 14 1, 15 - 8 ••' .50 16 12 4 36 i P: 4 .7:s A �_ 17 1 0 5 0 4 0 `31 05. 37 38 'QE R E_ P A I R:-- I NT V` H 1 L 9 ., u 9 m vo 18 9'' 19 14 11 A 1 N T E 1`4 A 1 ,, j E . M A E F` 7 7 39 40 1 0 - 0 0 20 15 11 ARY R. A V E L Z'Sx. R A I bi G JL G G G-1 A iq G iq 'GHA . 21 16 17 L W I A 1 0 !fl "r , -..i . .. 1. - 0 lz .2 :. 0 7 2- NO. 3 T F' A U L I R D Q U A E R D U F 0 1-, R iD A R Y 'k 100 1100 22 100 0() 23 24 18 19 J. Q C N C R T li R 1`4 A 1 F i:A S y G .7 2 2E 27 20 • 2E 121 --s' •1 -1 -1 4 i 1f _ .1 _ 1 rl r Lj 1:7 r, p �:i i T 449 4;2': 1 4 2, 23 1. 0 5 7 FJ 0 7' IL" 6 9 N Cl f T H W E 'T F A B F.,' I C 2" P F`O: R A 11 U 1*---' F L 1 5.17 31 24 25 026 10 57 6 -1�1 6 0 07 6 0 F U AR W:A SH CAR WA SH. 7 _ F-4 C 31 3! 13( 27 28 • A R W A 'I; i C' AR VJ A. S H ; %.- 21 z . 50 T 31 29 CAR WASH 7 .50 3! 41 30 31 r7l i ------ C A R: W A S H 4 1 27 C 4 32 4 33 34 6 9 i 64 ' '_ ' ' C4 N n 1 TF 6 AHI T A'T- I I i I -7 1 1 14 Q H 1 Sl F - (1: 1 A L EVE N 0 R D E 4 T i U L y 1 1 4 0 4 1 1 q 70 4 4 35 4 36 i P: 4 .7:s A �_ T 4 37 38 0 0 X y E N S E R V 1 C 11 A 1 N T E 1`4 A 1 ,, j E . M A E F` 7 7 39 40 1 0 - 0 0 P A A N K 11 ARY R. A V E L Z'Sx. R A I bi G S 0 I 41 1 4 42 P: "_D I r -x T F L M 1 7 T 4- 43 HOT OS 44 45 --s' •1 -1 -1 4 -1 W R' A i V E H G L E P 1 R M A I 44 ...:. F 00 e . 1 . 0 71 47 0 L ' P H E R ► FJ L, E T P K U 1 '_3 i i E 11 F5 HE V Ru LE T 48 — ------ tj 49 0+ 00 !' U L S V t to ►Yf "t I N S I to 0 01 D R 1 '..t K C 0 N S U L T A N R I 'S iii 5 4 2 PREF R R 7 50 �: u IT 9 G E - i 1 M " r 4 i n 1 f f% % - 7 A c_ * C- 1 a L_ R Q G R A M S W P P 6 1 P_ S 51 4 40 1531 1 o 5 .. .- - / -. . r., --- 0 W F 0 ! t 1 S 7 4 1 C, 0 o , .3 R 4 11 j 1:; 6MA p FZ C"i G Ul F F I 'S' 7 0 L 1 E 'S, '�1' .. ffv 5 1 :3 F" F ( !_i E:] 1 A i v I P Pi_ I --- _Z... i. A 1-li.:,All I i. -L -ii i ` ; C . T V I ..., F . . 'i ' F-' A I �� 0 L) C'. FI Fk' J'-.l* G I- 1-k! Cl ao S U F2 PL I E E' E Q U F'M E N 1 6 5 C 1. 0 0 . 0 2f 0 6 9 3 SPS OFFICE P R 0 D U C I S 1 .41 9 6 42 �" R Y KLEEN. R P' S V I C'�E-. M A HINE .6 10 6 9 (S. 1:8 0 4 fS, 0 A FF: 43 44 :4 .4 :.S. C� �j C4 W 9 �-;, 45 F4 T 411 N f-%'E F U (4 D V A LL 1=.YF* A I R �� „ )o 69 11 0 C 46 1 6 1 831505 • 0 7 2 "S 3 S P E C I lk L T Y R' At D 1 0 -`3 E R V I (".1E S + lyl A. I t,,IT R AD 10 -t t - -� I t- �.A A. I'D I' E R 1 2 lyl A I N 11 R A 1) 10 2 :65 66 p P A I R 1 M A A 1) 10 INT .50 3 67 3 68 4 4 V* C4 L4 C,-44 F-. P* E* N D 0 R C C VENDO -lyl t 1 T E" I 5 t. 6 70 5 NUMBER N U Mi B E R. 1) AT • N A M E D C R F I 1 1 A !Y1 0 U NT A r fl A I I 1',tj 7 6 72 0 07 1;,--'6 P 3 S P. S, O F I C E, P RODU"I'S .831 X)0 R P A I R .1 N -f C. Ll' I P I'l E NT 8 73 74 75 7 10 5'S `7 7 4 1 -'-30 0 0 ' 7 L k A lyl E-E Y CL. I NIC P R E Pl ACENMENT EXAM f I 9 5 0 0 10 112 8 9 ° -H) EVP EQUIPMENT 4 41 24 4 6- ;l f -4 4964.!�43' RANGE* (;q-YHT-V 13 10 1 4 7 4 1 5 0 7 ILI R lyl S E Y "Cl U 11" Y PT A T U i T 10 NS 3 U .150 11 0 1 5 12 16 1 3 0 9 0:: 7 6 1 0 0 0 .7. i Z�" 6 .33 ROAD- R Sc.! 'S' U P P L I E S �F IJ 1 P NT 1 2 80 17 18. 0. 18 19 14 15 R - RY N N GAP 8 C4 20 ao S U F2 PL I E E' E Q U F'M E N 1 6 5 C 1. 0 0 . 0 2f 0 6 9 3 SPS OFFICE P R 0 D U C I S 1 .41 9 6 42 �" R Y KLEEN. R P' S V I C'�E-. M A HINE .6 10 6 9 (S. 1:8 0 4 fS, 0 A FF: 43 44 :4 .4 :.S. C� �j C4 W 9 �-;, 45 F4 T 411 N f-%'E F U (4 D V A LL 1=.YF* A I R �� „ )o 69 11 0 C 46 1 6 1 831505 • 0 7 2 "S 3 S P E C I lk L T Y R' At D 1 0 -`3 E R V I (".1E S R [*E F' A I R lyl A. I t,,IT R AD 10 -t t - -� 63 64 R E PA lyl A I N 11 R A 1) 10 8 .45 :65 66 p P A I R 1 M A A 1) 10 INT .50 67 68 69 E."'. P I F*--.. rI.A. I N T R A D I C) 70 R F'. P A I R` MA 1 NT IT Al) 10 F-5 Cl .4- 71 72 0 07 1;,--'6 P 3 S P. S, O F I C E, P RODU"I'S .831 X)0 R P A I R .1 N -f C. Ll' I P I'l E NT 0 7 73 74 75 i i r7l T r_l 1:� P-�zS__ t A T 1. V- r R 76 0 1 V 0 L) H R E' Cl i� 4 jR .6r 4 33 0 r C IT Y I'l A' P L. EW 0 0 D 25 P A 14 7 1 34 26 G E A/ Rw Q 7 ..3 TA Rr C P C 1 0 11 5 0 S.::T 0 R f� S P .2i R' A M P L -RCO I ES 2 5 35 81 27 P RQ 9 R A 14 9 p p i-.i li 9 36 FOR PERIOD S U I-' F` L. I E , J - EQU I P il E N T 2 37 38 2 29 S U P P L 71 E S 0 F I C E �� . r r'� 39 3 3 40 3 S U p I j N I "T 01 R I A L 4 4 C: H E_ c ". k.' V E N D 0 R C. HIF C* K" V E14 D 0 R" T 11 11 1 TE i t 5 C H E C K 6 5 N U t i l B , E R N I J l y l Birl R DA TE DESCR' IPT ION AMOUNT A lyl 0 U N T 7 51 6 : 4 . 50 47 36 8 48 7 10 6 0 4 8m 4 • 0 2 r F V . S:T A" E 0 F M I N NmE S 0' A I "f URE A E., -0 R M M illyl COOP, P U RC H S I J ' j V '- 9 10 S U P P L I E S Q LJ I P N E N 8 51 39 ------ - 52 53 9 T IEW V E H 1 C LE ALLOWWAGE 1 2 1 3 10 1 4 0 11 4 3 5 5 0 0 7 Z 6. 3 S T I C 0 1 N D US' IF R E S I N S U F P L. I !EL S V E H Ir r L - 398 .51-1 . :0 398 15 5 12 16 13 1 0 6 0 7 4 3 1 5" 0 6j 9 S T R E I C E R S Q U N S W-TAL- DETECTOR ' 17 18 14 S Ll FrP L 'I E� S RAN Z 9 9 19 15 w i* cl; I WL 0 2 lb 1171 10 41:"o 8 :'B. t " 0 0 18. 0 0 7 I:S / 9' 3 T . A SCHIFSKY S 13 11 S I N C 4 1 5 :3, 1 . 7 4 ASPHALT - ,, - � J � 23 24 25 19 26 I T 20 T 27 I" PA RT L E . 0609 E.' 4'* 0 1 00 7 it1 j 9 J. AU U P P L I E 28 211, 211 22 U 'T 0 P A R T S U P F L I E S V E- H I C: L E 1 4) C" 10 G-11 C) 0 13 1 30 0 1 Z_' 6 9 3 T J A 40 7' 1 U P P L E E' 54 10 L" I �31 .131 7 1 0 0 7' 1.-1 / 9 2; T OT A L T O i I L I %J - VEHICLE Z 8 . 7 1 24 K P A i� 4 jR .6r 4 33 25 A 1 A A 34 26 G E A/ Rw Q 7 ..3 TA Rr C P C 1 0 11 5 0 S.::T 0 R f� S P .2i R' A M P L -RCO I ES 2 5 35 27 P RQ 9 R A 14 9 p p i-.i li 9 36 28 S U I-' F` L. I E , J - EQU I P il E N T 79 61 37 38 29 S U P P L 71 E S 0 F I C E �� . r r'� 39 30 40 3 S U p I j N I "T 01 R I A L 41 42 32 S LJF'rp L I E 0 FF 1 E z 43 33 g C F 44 34 F_ I C S U F'f"-- L I E: OFf t- 4 4 5 0 45 46 035 51 P R 0 G F. A ffl SUPPLIES : 4 . 50 47 36 c) 48 37 S PPLI.ES FF E 4 0 49 50 38 S U P P L I E S Q LJ I P N E N -, 51 39 ------ - 52 53 40 7' 1 U P P L E E' 54 10 L" I �31 .131 7 1 0 0 7' 1.-1 / 9 2; T OT A L T O i I L I %J - VEHICLE Z 8 . 7 1 54 11 - I I H .1 .'. w ;:�', 4 ' 1 1 - ' U F' L Q 73 55 74 56 02 75 7 2. N I F R IN S L 0 1 1--,l 1 061 '51 0 1 Li N I R M rlzj� U 1`4 L tl I T E _76, 1571 ir-.- ly! 0 2. c I i I 46 F-7 L _.j 0 41 55 42 1-1 2 2 Q r5V_ 0 Z4; B' Q. L- A 1 A A .4; 56 0 6 i 43 57 58 44 8 10800 1.*& 9 3 T R U C U T.1 L ta 1 06 151 - IS 0 7 1 TES MF POWER T A ta I L G AT E L 1 FT 59 45 2- lyl 4 -1 hl:i' V W I C�l F= 60 46 REPA I R MA is 1--1i T V E i I C L E 21. 1 6 61 Z. 3 6 0 7 62 47 63 48 21 2 9 64 65 49 66 50 1061 '�3 1 0 51 3 T W I N IJI IES R, A N 'S F; R T AND J U lyl P %E3 'T A R T 0 0:: 67 51 2 68 52 c) 0 69 70 53 71 54 11 - I I H .1 .'. w ;:�', 4 ' 1 1 - ' U F' L Q 73 55 74 56 02 75 7 2. N I F R IN S L 0 1 1--,l 1 061 '51 0 1 Li N I R M rlzj� U 1`4 L tl I T E _76, 1571 ir-.- ly! 0 2. c I i I 46 F-7 L _.j 0 P A G E 1 V 0 U C. I--( f--k'E G y " F I'll A PL E W OiD D 4 "l" 1-51 I 0 1710 0 1 CV, 0 0 7 6 / 9 UNITED SUPPLY Cf.-JRP. VEHICLE- 1 05 f T t v j FOR PE I A R E E KEN, G w 2 e9 13 1 9 1'60 7* 0. 2- 6s I; V X L D IL' 2 .,:.L. A W N E N C* E R E r- U 11 D 0 V Ek fD A Y I*tl E N T co 0.1 rt E N'r A G E w 4' 200 18 3 • MA INT A CI R E Ell E til T b 4 C 1-1 E C K. V E'I*Nl D 0 R CHECK V E I'l D C, li I If E M A E E. 1-1 E N T C C. H E C: 1-1 6 5 NU N 11-3' E R N U lyi D- 1*--'-'R 0 ATE A I I EE C". I F T N A Mi 0 li N'T A tyl OU hl T 7 6 17 9 7 18 9 4 Gu A U N1 I F Cl R lyl S C L C 1* H I - NG 1',i 4F, 10 8 19 L-1111A RMS 8; C. L. OTH I [,,I G 45 11 9 20 E R 11 G E k ,.:r C . 0 Nil 9 TH 1 N, 4, G 4 112 4 "l" 1-51 I 0 1710 0 1 CV, 0 0 7 6 / 9 UNITED SUPPLY Cf.-JRP. VEHICLE- 1 23 0 6 ` 4 4 1 7 4 4 31 J. 5 `=t 0 7 0 0 0 7 IQ 3 WESCO SUPPLIE-D EQU I P i'flEl%j T 3 2 24 31 34 -:UF P w �S J 'PLY: I q IT.MENT 1. 25 VIA. P L E W D:. 4 1 0 T J. 6 '9:1,3 3,r 261. E� 3E TF!44S, 27 - - - - - - - 3 7 ., J 7 ri 2 : - 6 .4 .. - o - P., - e� j : 0 6 *2'--' 8 5 0 10 0 0 7 / 2--� 6 / 9 3 W 0 N D lE" R M A T C L E A N i fR cujz J A V ET * .34 :3 4 0� 1 14( x 0 :A T -I 1 � j J � j 4 1 960.45 ol"/ E'R C. R 12 M A I IN A R E E KEN, G 17 4 ' 13 1 9 1'60 7* 0. 2- 6s I; V X L D IL' 2 .,:.L. A W N E N C* E R E r- U 11 D 0 V Ek fD A Y I*tl E N T co 0.1 rt E N'r A G E w 4' 200 18 4/1 14 MA INT A CI R E Ell E til T 19 4/1 1 5 I W.C -L '1-,7� N oiL 1 P.4 W T OT H E A E E. 1-1 E N T C 20 21 16 tr'lJ*-%3 A L. 3 1 of 7( 4 5 22 17 23 18 9 4 Gu A R 1-: P U IN D F F. Ez j 24 25 19 26 1 20 E R 11 G E k ,.:r C . 0 Nil V EL. r Z .. Tk 1 NIN 6: 27 28 121 G6.E- ALLGWANGE in lgq 23 0 6 ` 4 4 1 7 4 4 31 J. 5 `=t 0 7 0 0 0 7 IQ 3 WESCO SUPPLIE-D EQU I P i'flEl%j T 3 2 24 31 34 -:UF P w �S J 'PLY: I q IT.MENT 1. 25 VIA. P L E W D:. 4 1 0 T J. 6 '9:1,3 3,r 261. E� 3E TF!44S, 27 - - - - - - - 3 7 ., J 7 ri 2 : - 6 .4 .. - o - P., - e� j : 0 6 *2'--' 8 5 0 10 0 0 7 / 2--� 6 / 9 3 W 0 N D lE" R M A T C L E A N i fR cujz J A V ET * .34 :3 4 0� 1 14( x 0 :A T -I 1 � j J � j 4 1 960.45 ol"/ E'R C. R c. 1 .3 t 93 M A I IN A R E E KEN, G 4 ik 4 ' 16/ 0 9 3 M A 3: NN P4 rt E N'r A G E w 4' . 0 3 4d 6 . 4 9 :7 .1 4/1 MA INT A CI R E Ell E til T 4! 1'{ 7 4( 4/1 6 0 ' Q 3 C M A I N T A E E. 1-1 E N T C 4, 49 147 6 1 16 48 6 a 49 6 50 6 511 El 55 a 7 7 56 57 • 1'ii"il....�wf it L.�f'�l..i!"7; .L 1'�F �'7i1.! !"'ii"fti lil..if«»f....Lf1«i�..s I+ .I. l.J•! #t • Ii ! 1..� i i i f�7 i..r L«� i s ! '� �4 S i F"} i i.» i i �..3 _ ::, : .... ;.. :::: _ ....... .. C ,:.:.. ... � :: ,._... E: _ . ::. :: :: .:. .. :. _ :::::....:. : _ : J.... 2 .. ,. .. :: ..... . . _ ._. . .:. .:::.:..... .... ... .: ...::.. _ 3 ::. . .:. _ .. ... ,: _. . » ,..»s . _ - • 5 f i :, t}{} �„{. t .. :. �} r s :'.,... - .: :. .... ...:..... 7 . .. .. ......: .... .. ... .. . .:: :... ... .... .- .::: . . . ... ....... .. -• _ ... .. ..: :.. .. ..... ... M M YM. �w .. .. ..... ... ..... ..... ... .: :.:... _ t ... .».... M. MK, l..K. ....... ...... .. ... :;.. :,:.. :::: :. '.- F .•.:.. .- ... ♦:... ..-:.. .:::::. :: .. .. `,.. .:... •. :. ...: .:.. ..: ::.. .' ....... .... .:... ... .. .. .:. .. : .: :... ... .. .. ...... ...:..':::':: ;::: ... ....: .. ... .... •. ..:. .:.. :..NN. 1M * iC ....... 1.0 MM.: 1010. .. ... .. .........:.:: .:.: _ _: .... ... 9.. -- 40 11 ;-. 1 3 . . . . ' ::: ': ...:.::... ...... .... _ . ...... _. _ __.. ......_................ _... .. <: ::. .. : _. _:: , ..: :.:. ::...:.- .:........ . ..:, .. .. ..::::. .. .. : _ ::. . ...... ..... . ......_ .. _ . ... _ _ _. _ _ _.... ............. _ ..._.. _,._ __...: ;...._._.,...,.:: »} f »} �s ...�_ '� _ .... I ....:.... .: _.::.: _. . . ..... ... _. ,.: ,..t - . _ _ ... ... ;:: : ..:::. .... , _:: _ .. .........:..:..._ ....:.:.. t ` . I 1 :: 0 17 19 -.. -. _ _ . .. ... :. _ .::. _ ::.. -.... .:..;: _.. .:., . _: :. : .. :; :. } .. 22 0fw},..s...365i.». «} f f .L f' ` t..i PA 1» R I C I A HEf '4SLF... Y I 'J R b6 23 24 }»} 1�»} a i" ,.., �s } } •w.r t r•t f ;s ' '•{ • »t L }. +_} }�� s 25 ;' . .. . _.... .....<.:..:. ._ } # t. ::. :... <.:.. ... .-:....: _:... ... t:. � :..? < :..: . : _ :..... :` .. : _ rf 27 ... 28 0 }� X65 5 07 / 16/ 3 DAV I D J JAHN . 1 , 0 5i. 6 �} . 40 29 .. 31::. .. .. . ... . .. .: . . '. ::.. , - . :: : „ :":... », » .. <..f �..f..... . . .: : :: .•.• : < : �...: :... 33 .. .• : .: .::.. 34 f_}f»}3565 f_} t ftt '.1''�.« 8! . 88 - * 35 . 36 "} }"} :i ' r i.:. 1"' . i fw} ".t r r•t a. '{ .... » •'{ .... ' { i -•» 1 . r- •- `»�► = _ -.:. .:__.. A 1 a two - 3 7`. : > .....::. ::: . :.:.: :. . .. ::.. ;: , .. ;: .» , ` 39 ;: 40 0 } 3 566 i .} ,� #' } # # I 1 198,0 },;.}i;,} 0 41 3 .:.. s.. „.. :... . ,. ,... . . :: �••'' 2• . . . 4 5 :...... ... : :- .. :. ..... 46 0 0 3 ti'M..f 6 6 4 } »} 7 / 1 6 / .J � •+ f..« .L i `� �.t i"'b �_ � t»r F`. 1 1 } »} 5 0 R �' } 0 40 47 };} lR 4`> 9 - _ :: :. . , . . .. '::. . ..... _ ... _'. ;. r ,.. ,...:. _ _ ... _ : _ < . _ . . ;. . . M . .. 51 . .... ... _ .... . _.. .. . .. . . __. . . _ .- . _ . . _ . 52 fes} 1»} 2; ti..� fis 1w.i { 14w} � ft 3. �? ft ..f .� '' '' A L T'7 } =4 T"i �• i' 1 T'? } i } � � t�'� .i. # 1:.'. � «S • 2 t»} 40 53 L.. R 55 . ., ::: .. :. . ;;< .>... .{�� F... . ..:: t } }. . .. 5 .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . ..-, ..... ... . 4V CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS Y6 FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD • i :.. � `; { _ . _ .... . :.. 3 .. _. 0035b/ 07/16/93 CAROLE*J ANDERSON 5 i 7 8 ::: :.... ::::... .. .. - :: �j•»w� . f . }. .: ..:...i. :......... _ ... ,s.:: , ,:::: ,. , ::... :. :::.. u ..r.........E...... . j . 9 ._ _. 10 #w} k } ;; �: "' ' {{ f s !� r -�• tom• i' t 157 �3 11 12 - _ :.. f T #y } 0035 0 7/161 " . 33 - W �..# 7 # 1 4w ... M». iw.. . ` f r � 17 18 r« .: .... R .. t t . . • „ s .7. in:� ... .." 21> w « L« 5 6 _ 6 � 23 ti 5. _ . :071 MARY 27' :. : 28 29 30 s "} "} ".,� �.•{ r• �,.{ ss ! "} t E% _+ r- •� i = i s:...# ,,, .. ...• _ 14 3 4w 32 _.. . j -� ,t . �a _. JOANN _. 35 «r HANES 095 '43 39. , .. 40 0035 t w} t r' Ot 1.. #"; '� L.. . l i. -` 1 0 95, 43 40 42 642. .}. f •» } . 43 • . 44: » »y 6/ 9 3 : 5.. 46 6 t } k ; "} ,�� s5 � 1 « f ti.} ! � �. �� � � � � #� t...# +� �..� �S �.: L«. 16 4 47 48 3 5 07/ i 1115 scol I 49 : .•w • � -•ti ;«" r » 9 , .. :. y .:. , .: "'•i . r- . ,_ , t ' •�t : � }" Est 51 , 52 07 16 JOHN J BANICK • 53 54 0035695 •• } { # y f i �•- }� �••� �-• t� f' t t� 55 ; �. •.. _ DOLE ::: 1 L. S 1..�' -•• r r 57 4V s CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR T HE CURRENT PAY PERIOD h y 6 ,. Lk DA .... .. . k r 1 ... ti 2 ...,: ... ... ... .. 41 :..: . RICHARD M MOESCHTER 1 642a lQ � 5 6 `} } t 3 jemPs yo I .. r (�•' :• ... A .. :. ;.. •. ► :. 9 10 '.. WILLIAM F ELTIER 83 003570 {« .. .... �. «.« }. 1 } •a } } } s 19 -1/ :. ... ... ,- 13 14' 70 t 07 / 1 6 / 9 3 } i �...• T"t } i ar ]} } }•+•� i 6 i 17 M` f`} 2 22 � I � � #��. � +� #"i � �''� � #''� "� } 1 1 7 ° r } 3r.» f 10 0 0 , 5 7 • 0 7 /16/ 93 ® 23 24 0711 kA a 25 . 2 28 � ..:.."'= f_ }'� --r r r• �+ � ,..}• ! � ? 't t� �..� 3 i } S �... �t"�. } !� t" � g 72 t..� '�i '{'� 32 :. _'. '.'w w�. �. wY��..w "•.. "�' :�' �. .. :: - ... - arr� jj��jj.. .... }. :: .'. .'�. `M».F �MM'�� .:. ..... ,. - 33 �• :. 0 1 642m 10 S 35 _ _.....::.. 40 0 03 5 7 15 : 0 7 jj 93 fir. I t I 11841,27 rte, 41 - � ;' -•7 45 - _ 47 74 9 o :.. . }. .} ; ' 07/ _ 51 52 t t..?' `' { ... #`l , 9 1 3 . 6 o 0 0 3 57 2 1 «} -• : i t..? 53 54 ......._ } , _... r ... .. - - •T t f r • _ # . ._ ... ..P, V 0 R W E 8 1 55 56 ub ... ERO 9 4 24 fz) f j j6 S-7; WALTER Lr_ 4 u 4: F 26 H F 003576 ... .... . ... . 27' .2 10 0 28 0 3 1'5- 0 7 1 (5 9 3 JILL PETERS 152. 29 307 Z 1 7%. 0 0 . . ....................... .. ... .... 31 .. ........ W- 32 'T a U. : D 1: T G,W E R'TH .. ..... .. ... LJ .... ....... 33 ....... 341 00-)2,5 77 39 07 16 93 KENNETH G HAIDE R 41W 135 .0w. 36 JUD' il C H L E 18 E Q ..... .. 6 kj, 0 37 . .. 38 0 C -v p CITY OF * LL -M- f_'. 7 4 39 . . . ..... /6 40 _.T A+ 0 7 ff 1 6/ 93 G}.... BALD W ME YrE R 41 . .... 42 E. C - NUMBE..' L ...... .. n --EC M i� L-iik—L KANE ............... ........ ... .. .... . ..... . . ..... ..... .......... .. . A"MOUttlT ....... 43 2 .... . ....... . ... ........ .......... ................ A + 3 .. ............ . ........ . ... ...... ... 4 JAMES MEEHAN 11944,55 DAV I D P LUT Z 5 47 6 7 1, F_ 7 1 A I q 73: _Q 7 1 b /,J,:5 tJDE R ..... .. ... 7 ... .... ... ..... .. ..... .... ... .... ... . . . ...... ... 8 . ..... 9 3 ...... . . . ..... .... ...... ..+� NDE�H" .. ......... . . ... ........... . . ..... . . .......... A 9 5253 7 -7 07 1 6 ".9 3 10 7 -7 16 J 9 t.j t. A 1,) 785a 61 54 - HELEY_ 12 55 .1 W L -L 10 1 4 0 0 13 0 3.5 0 CKr .0 S W'A GO. 571. j 14 N 15. 16 00 35-730 0 _7 1 6 ii3 JULIE A S T A H Nr'-" E .L +� iii ��r =«f�i 17 18 00357-3 -7 - ---- --- 07 1 Gzq3 f # � Zs; 7 19 - -- 20 DE LS 2% .. .......... . . .... .. 221 0t«a 5 7 3 3 7 01) 9 4 24 fz) f j j6 S-7; WALTER Lr_ 4 u 4: F 26 H F 003576 ... .... . ... . 27' .2 10 0 28 0 3 1'5- 0 7 1 (5 9 3 JILL PETERS 152. 29 307 Z 1 7%. 0 0 . . ....................... .. ... .... 31 .. ........ W- 32 'T a U. : D 1: T G,W E R'TH .. ..... .. ... LJ .... ....... 33 ....... 341 00-)2,5 77 39 07 16 93 KENNETH G HAIDE R 41W 135 .0w. ga 36 JUD' il C H L E 18 E Q ..... .. 6 kj, 0 37 . .. 38 0 C -v p Jt LL -M- f_'. 7 ILA 39 . . . ..... 40 _.T A+ 0 7 ff 1 6/ 93 G}.... BALD W ME YrE R 41 42 0 10 A t- f C)7 i b M i� L-iik—L KANE 1 14 43 F W 44 A + 45 46 3 5 7 4 5 0 7 1 649 3 DAV I D P LUT Z 1 257 , 50 47 48A 00,5�J746 _Q 7 1 b /,J,:5 E �j D A RST 49 a Q 3 5 7 47. . . ..... 9 3 H E N. -KY F KL.f 'US I NG 1 20 5 1 5253 - 0035748 07 1 6 ".9 3 JOHN S CH?i Jml u— u— C K 2 -12SP 3 40 54 - HELEY_ 55 56 0 3.5 0 CKr .0 S W'A GO. 571. j ga I& CITY OF MA LEW100 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD .J 16 • :: J.; NUMBEE. 4 .. .. .. . wo ] 3 0035751 RONALD L FREBERG lj 287 00 07/16/ 5 6WILL' 3 _• r : •••t r9 Et 2 7 . .. .......7 ••gin _ ......,, ........ .......::. ,::. ••.::.;:.:'-::-;- . ..: �,{ g . ......... 00L5� . 291.:S, _ _ w 13 14 f 1 16 0035751 521, 20 17 18 �. }} 23 24 ;}:} JOHN R 0 F U-1,_. _ 40 ;.: 1 .�._..:.: . . 27 . 28 = RENNER - I • 29 30 - w._ 31 32 : t a... 33 34 83, 20 36lM}i } a MARGA 3 .E ...: fir_ 8:�'.. •.' :.....:.•.:.. .. s .... ' :... .:. .: ,.: - .:.-. :R �SO b D .. ...... ...:.. -M' N..• I 1 i :.: .:. ... .. .: r •([' ( � i ... 39 _f » » 5 7 Es 9 Its +� .amr � 40 � 41 42 - - ,..f f » 16/93 _ t�} �'� 607/ 43 00 5_ _105m 00 46 47 .. ....::.... .... 49 _... ... . # _.._ :... .. ..... _. {•.• ..» :: .:.. ,, :.. i. {y ;']�.r � :. .. � R L { •fes` yyS W 51 5200357 _ i r._•J j_} ."jr_ ! .j} � ! '.••j � ���'! j lw. '� L... �=moi t.� F"t 1+'i 1..: i i � i '_ � 1....'�..} 53 54 _. .... K -A ... S ''' -f. 4 55 56 f ND L 5 - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ' 0006 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD MATTHEWKIMLINGER CRAIG MISKELL JUDITH A HORSNELL 258.00 ' | ) 414.00 6z8.36 25. ON29 4 0035778 ()7/16/93 40 0035796 07/16/93 NICHOLAS N CARVER 11475e6O 41 30 0 10 0035781 07/16/93 ��4 —0035798 71 46 003=15799 07/16/93 KELLY RYAN 201. 25 16 0 7V 33 3 017 18 00 22 0035 717 07/16/93 521 MATTHEWKIMLINGER CRAIG MISKELL JUDITH A HORSNELL 258.00 ' | ) 414.00 6z8.36 55 56. 0035804 HELL''S 25. ON29 39 40 0035796 07/16/93 NICHOLAS N CARVER 11475e6O 41 30 0 ��4 —0035798 71 46 003=15799 07/16/93 KELLY RYAN 201. 25 oal 55 56. 0035804 HELL''S 39 40 0035796 07/16/93 NICHOLAS N CARVER 11475e6O 41 42 0 ��4 —0035798 46 003=15799 07/16/93 KELLY RYAN 201. 25 47 51 521 0035802 07/16/93 CHAD JEROME 51.) 55 56. 0035804 HELL''S CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0007 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS 0 0, FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD o H: ECK UO LeH.-ECK D 2 5 8 V3 . ...... .. . ... .. ... . . ... .. .. . . . . .. . . ... . 0 3 7 4 0 3 5 8 5 07/ 1.6/93 BE RN 7 00 391 00 5 35 36 IL 821 0 C L Z Nt HU G C 6 37 38S' 07 1 G i;3 N ID P4 L L E C'... EN E ........... LL HO' 7 39 . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.., .: .: •:, .: •:.::.::...::.... 0 ,,.• 580 7 .. ice. ::..:::.:::..:.% . . . . . . .... REME R.*--'�i.**..-; .119,25 9 41 42 .7 -.)7/1 ER ICK LA I-VALA 10 ie 7-- 0035808 0)35825.: 2 6 0 jj 11 45: r•. 12 46 0035826 0 16 3 2. 1 30 00 13 14 7ff 1: SHER: ..m 5 3 15 49 16{"}R� 23, 5 6 1 1 0 9 3 00 232.,50. 17 51 18 1 2 0 0 8 2 9 ANNPTIE LEK 2 Z, 1 1 19 20 00 3 5 D A 21 55 56 00358 3 .. ........ 7 22 0035814 I 100, 00 23 24 07 le, 9 P-4 D RA Fir 18, 25 26 t d b. . .... .. N :mt PBE ........ 27.. 7., �7. 281 0 0 3 8 17 07/1 all 40 29 31 5 8 V3 . ...... .. . ... .. ... . Jc NN 0 33. 34 003582Q. 07/16/133 391 00 35 36 IL 821 0 C L Z Nt HU G C 37 38S' 0 0 oda ... ..... ... 0-7 1 C'... EN E ........... LL HO' 39 40 35823 .119,25 41 42 03 58E4 -.)7/1 ER ICK LA I-VALA ie 43 44: 0)35825.: SVENDS., jj 45: 46 0035826 0 16 3 00 047 PA27 5 3 49 tip 0 9 3 PAUL... m M.. 232.,50. 51 52 0 0 8 2 9 53 54 55 56 00358 3 0 7. 57' 0 lb QQ3584�6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0006 ELIZABETH J WE-ILAN.D E- 37 /6 ... .............. ...... ... ... ... ... Y iDERIOD 38 .... .. ... . .. . . ....... ... . ..... . .. . ....... .. .... ............... ... .. ........ .. ..... ... .. . .. ...... ... ... .. . :�AMOUNT 71 2 39: ...... .... .......... .*.,::;:*:,.,::.:::..::..........,::.,.,..� ........... . ............ ... .......... ... ......... .... . .. .... .. ... .. . ............... .......... ... .... . .. .... ......... ... .. ...... a 3:.. .. .... .. . .. ....... ....... .... V 0 1 D 07/16/93 4 . i 0 ANDRE 604 00 D 5 FIRS MINNESOTA F I. CIA 0 i— I Q 041 K5 43 6 Q 3 5,.cA 3 3 JENN I EE R I ghi@Ml 2 9 F-,,. 7:. ......... .. ..... . .... . ..... ....... .. .. . .. ...... .. . .. ..... .. ..... . ....... ... . .............. . .............. . ... ..... ..... ....... . .... ..... .... . .. .. ..... . ......... .. ..... ...... . . .... .... ... ... . .. . ........... ...... ......... ...... ... ... . .. . .......... ...... .. ...... . .. .............. . . ......... . . .......... ........ . ....... . .... .. ........... 8 .. . ....... ..... . . .... . . .. . .. ....... ....... . ...... .. . ..... .. ....... ...... ..... ..... ... .. ..... . . ....... . .......... . . . ........... ............. .... . . ................... ....... ....... .............. ..... . . ....... .. . . . .... ...... ..... .. .... ........ ....... .. ........ .... ...... . ... .... . ... .. ........ .. ........ . . ............ 9: ... . ........... ........ .. ......... ... . .... ... .... 07/ 1 Ed 93 ICMA RET I REMr`-, TRUST -457 10 0035835 REBECCA BANCE 5 0 07/16/93 11 468 15 12 z 6./ 49: 50 00358,55. To.: �D ...... ... . ..... .. .. ...... . ..... .. .... .... ...... ... .. . . ..... ..... . ... .... .. . ............... ....... ... ...... . ... .. ... .. .. ..... .... . ... . ... . ..... .. .... . . .. ....... .... .... . ..... .. ..... .... ...... .. .. .... ...... ...... ..... . ... ...... . -R .. ... ... . .... . 4 6 4 15 ..... .... .. ... .... .. . ...... . ...... ... ... ..... ... . .... .... . . ....... ... ... . .. . ....... ...... .... ....... .. .... ....... CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION 31, 247, 00 16 0035838 07/16/93 DOUGLAS i B 11 .�'' ED WAY OF ST, PAUL A JIV" E A 17 .7 18 EDWARTI A NAL)Ej9U .. ... 15457,91 .... V 19 NIE IHLI�-�:�L t : -RCI. li 57 - HALt KEV1. N 4E JR, 3:73 75 21.. .. . .. ......... ...... ...... . ...... 22 0035841 ROGER W BREHEIM 11 275, 60 23 24 5 ji- 4 DAVID�B E D E --i 0 N -3 E, 1 25- 26: ::•.. . ...... 0:03z' )84 Y. ...... V ...... 7/ 1, ..... ... ... ...... .. ..... 27 28 C) AA 07 16 93 4 5, 6 029 30 5 Fi 4 F, . . ......... .. .. .. ....... .. . ...... . .. ..... ... . ....... ... . 0 . .... . . ... EO:R ..... . ,E .... ....... ....... ............. . ........... 34 0035.847 07116Y 36 CONNIE I 044, 29 lb QQ3584�6 07 1 b., 93 ELIZABETH J WE-ILAN.D 24 37 ... .............. ...... ... ... ... ... '447, 38 N-0. . . .. ... .... ... 7/4 9*3:!' ... -�MAPL' --S-- ... ... # 14 5 39: ......... ... .. ...... a . ... ... 40 0035 8- 50 41 V 0 1 D 07/16/93 PIN STATE COMM OF REVENUE i 0 42 ,J)D35 D 07/16/93 FIRS MINNESOTA F I. CIA 0 i— I Q 041 K5 43 . ..... .... .. .... 0J'5-652 V. 0: 1� J ....... ....... ... . .... .. . .. �P 45:* .. ........ 46ENT 0 0 3 5 :56 �0' 47 07/ 1 Ed 93 ICMA RET I REMr`-, TRUST -457 12,$ 045, 38 48 0 0 3 5 8- 5 4 VOID 07/16/93 FIRST MINNESOTA 468 15 49: 50 00358,55. To.: �D ")7 C-TTY�`.- 0 MAPLEWO.OD:' :.:(HC. . . .. .... bdo .76' 51!. .1 52 C»}035856 53 07/16/93 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION 31, 247, 00 540 0 5 1 3 52A OID 0 1 f'- 3- 9 3 .�'' ED WAY OF ST, PAUL A JIV" E A 128, 44 .7 ....... ..... .. 55 561,'. C )()-*"5858, .... V ... ... . 07 161 NIE IHLI�-�:�L t : -RCI. li 57 - lb CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 9 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROL'L.DEDUCI.-I,ON CHECKS l� 1 FOR THE CU E���«� PAY PERIOD a -s :. NUMB I.tE,:•,:: ... .. . PAY Elw0 2 ,.. ::. '... ':�. '' :... _:. 038 J : ' E��4 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYS 244 5 _ 7 -_. �[i YNR F. 10 9 0035862 07/16/93 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC !8,1 00 i} AY # "#5 13 13t _ .... . : j{L 15: 16 0 ._} 3 w..;8t5 5 J 0 I D w 282,46 �1 17 _ >- - ::. -'': ';�. :ter♦ ' rr: !!'' .: t '. _. ., ...j» :. .,..i ... .:...::.:: . • . - :• .f .. {..� r.,.::... :... .. - ...:... :. ..: .. . :. .. .. .h....... sw.e..S�w! ::. .. {w.. .. ..... .. .., 21 22 DCA 7,87 00 55 , 86a V 0 I D 23 24"} --� r s 5_3 MEDICA ctio C.E. 25 29 -72 «w ..- ElEN! AS 5 615, 07 31 .1� tE:'F'': 33 34 :. �.:. ••�- •�•� , ti 0 I D }-} �s i� _ ;i � ti''�) � �+yr{f }�'w-. `t t(—_ +{ i j�• ji-- (�y St ''jr-fw.1( L^'�' i^'�• (( �{ 1..� M' 1 � i...� 1 f ` ; i` 1� iw.. � .f. _ 35 36 EARN.37!7776 . _ _ ..:... ... 8 . < .... 39:. 40 S 41 42 43 46 • 47 48 ;'.. 49 50 _ 5 .; 52 . 53 54 55 w 56 _ AGENDA ITEM OZ MEMORANDUM cti on by Council: To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatioorse ---�-- Subj : Maplewood Nature Center Addition Mod.ifie� -.� Date: July 8, 1993 Re j ecte(I Date Introduction The Maplewood Nature Center has received small donations from visitors amounting to a total of $41.00 in June 1993. The Maplewood Nature Center has requested that the donations be added to the Park Development Fund. The city has received checks amounting to $715.00 for copies of plans for the Maplewood Nature Center addition. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council -accept the $41.00 in donations and $715.00 for Maplewood Nature Center addition plans and place the $756.00 in the Park Development Fund. (Nature Center Development Account #403-814-316-4720). c: City Clerk TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Final Plat Duluth Street and County Road C Goffs Mapleview Fourth Addition July 16, 1993 �3 .Action by Council:i Endorsed Modif i e Re-jecte Date Pat Goff, representing Goff Homes Inc., is requesting that the City Council approve the Goffs Mapleview Fourth Addition final plat. This five -lot plat is for a single dwelling andtwo double dwellings on the west side of Duluth Street, south of County Road C. (See the maps on pages 3-5.) BACKGROUND April 26, 1993: The City Council approved rezonings and the preliminary plat (subject to seven conditions) for Goffs Mapleview Fourth Addition. (See the preliminary plat on page 4 and the minutes on page 6.) DISCUSSION The developer has met all the conditions for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve the final plat for Goffs Mapleview. Fourth Addition. kr:memo46e.mem (9) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Properly Line/Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Proposed Final Plat 5. 4-26-93 Council muiutes At�-��hrr.W� - -� •� • • . . • 6'4b • .. • • • • • �, •� . • • ap#'b '• •• t •. . mow. qcr gel• COUNTY RD. D • LYDIA 3 . • U9 2� •00 0 eve BEAM AME.� .. ' • • ` `i' ... • w %(22) Kohlmon ` Lake Lake • _ I � couNly • J .. • PALM LTCT Q CON1NOR 0 • oaf 1 • y • cr. O B R• ,. • or Pte. • BEAM i� t; KOHLMMI AVE. Ci ROAD C ::. rte, W fit:AVE GERVAIS AVE. LOCATION MAP 2 } 0 G' ' ', � ` v � � CT' COPE W DR. KN1K�-► / LARK � � CO. RD. 4' OR Log" SFtERREli AVE v �JUNMN CT. � o IEIMID R0. z AVE. LOCATION MAP 2 } 0 19 0 MSCIM d4�rld�cfn PomdN V V� OR SFtERREli AVE v El z ista.� DEMON TOROOKS AVE SROC AVE. t; SEX TANTS � t;I s LAURIE a F5 O MSCIM AVE V� OR SFtERREli AVE Kn4t�od Lo LTJ AVE. ista.� Rfl. LAURIE a SM04 URST S B 13' 40 wo ' (42) Ns •.K Attachment 2Al V • ;. (44) C ib 4ii - - - - - - - - g -- 41 N00 477 Isla I4 P6 1 0 06C1 Apo 1 9 10 ��► I C . �11�t tig3��w 7 ,/ f � � ( `fit �3,• 1 H9 way. i3; 8 .Z� f%wa 41b CV) (43) CO • � .10 050 p - � -..- T sow r . r N '� �0 Lf) � Go . ,�•1...� _so gyp' . , _ N N N . N ti N N NC4 loo ��•* . �y� � � •3 014! lO 8 ;• •ti"� �: ..• -`•, i I 104 y,. J ♦ ,� , ; i1- . • 1�1 50 2 33 Z!39 ISS �o3.e'1 3� 40 -410 COUNT' ROAD C - • 1260-1268.1276=- ----- _,"1:�►.:.:: = 1200106; 'NT1262`1270 1278 L fCAN LAKEVI: W LUTHERAN CHURCH* 24 12= •. - 9 4� 61) -17iLAI ° IA 3%4- dim ot� r.. , 3� 831) �/x2 OPP. (ss)RAINB W = 1260 CLEANING SYSTEMS q� - . ,�► �' (� h --� �...-z 1262 � 2 ' ,� a o ,, r - T '• 110 -11270 . ♦s -- _ 12994 S� ... 6��� .A; � � 127 - �3 .� �f2 1280 X1292 C ;�; ��,P ter'( $ ^ >SC - -••• � . 34 1241 41 82 ` 11 82 � 1 � �• z ? __ q 40 •�.r.► : :•" :-:� �<< `1283 '1291 -" Irmo. F915- WHITE BEAR - 1299 ,� I MITSUBISHI 1297 a -.,. 3 ^...`. 1274 82 ° _ • •, !. iM 1284 Imo" t O r w1 w - wW128$� :9 12 4 • c♦ 1 '• •--I— �'� j PEN _ o«.� � , .�. +� . 1290,14 1296% ' ... i ~ O-G0� ---- •AVIE- 7� , J (too) '� bRAIN/►GE oED .._ _� •3 R D� D 4 G • A AREA tV OU TLO T A Dec. Ivo. d .. WET LAND - T.S. 7z306: 1 , 1 1 3, 1 . , �3 .� ':.f,� � 339.35 ' 17l67L 5s e- 3. 0+ - 3.04.(37) &1 14 PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP `Goffs Property to R-2 v. City Property to R-2 3 COUNTY ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 Attachment 3 3 '-EB 0 11993 ; . =L ieb�0.4m -0 w r40emm•« ArI=dri•was Attachment 4 oil s l _ s Sul I e• • si 0 L�_� �i .49 « �s 1" 1 1! s �s V • M • • 1 s r t � AL NO �� YM s • L ��� _ e • � ` �� sY i � 1 � Ort � �� 1 s , wW is ;l- # r rr', •�QO l � • w• tt x• � � ' .sr. s `� I t i we On 49 00lift s Al 16o- ' of / i •.N ••01 or00 to-. • •r0s Op 1a ia1 �•' •s.'�,� °0 • ` >in dam us r1 ..a• ( I �.� ~ ` •/j� fir. 'r•-! .. 1 at..a•� •dam' .. N ls- �, ..• I .C: • I �.. io t�•r •�• .• 0010 CIO 00,99 1— • � 1 N •� a s 1 so �O Li PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 5 _. ... �. ��.. o.. -. ., riI'�iY rPi"�J^rt�+f,. .... _. .. •1 m"YCF? �.� ;A!S•::.., _ .. . Seconded by Mayor Bastian Attachment 5 Counci 1 member Juker moved to amend the Resol uti on , to zone the adjacent Rr02erty as-..-"..farm".- Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Upon advice of the City attorney, the motion to amend was ruled out of order as that .action would require appropriate notice and a public.hearing. k. Counci member Juker withdrew the motion. VOTE IS ON ORIGINALRESOLUTION AS INTRODUCED ayes - all Plat 1. Council member Zappa 1) Obtain the City Engineer's approval of final construction plans. These plans shall include grading, utility, drainage and erosion control. plans. The utility plan shall show individual utility services to each double dwelling unit. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook. 2). Give the City a wetland buffer zone easement Over Lots 1-4, Block 2. This easement shall prohibit mowing, cutting, filling or dumping in within twenty feet of the wetland. 4-26-93 3) Show drainage. and utility easements along all property lines in Block One, except alongthe common property lines for the double dwellings. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines in Block Two, except along the common property lines for the double dwellings and around Lot Five. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. 4) Sign an agreement with the -City that guarantees that the developer will complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. This agreement shall include permanent signs along the wetland buffer zone. These signs shall state that there shall be no mowing, cutting, filling or dumping beyond - this point. 5) Label the fifth 1 o in 81ock Two as an outlof and deed it to the City. 6) Revise the plat to show a thirty -foot -wide right-of-way dedication for Duluth Street at the northwest corner of Block Two. 7) Showthe wetland boundaries on the pkat. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. Seconded by Mayor Bastian 6 ayes -all 4-26-93 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Final Plat LOCATION: Laurie Road, west of Binningham Street PROJECT: Northwood Village DATE: July 16, 1993 INTRODUC11ON F,w- y .heti oxo ' $� End. o red Modifie Re j ected.. Date �y Mari requesting Cochiarella is re uestin that the City Council approve the Northwood Village finalp lat. Mr. Cocharella represents Maplewood Development and Construction, Inc. This 24 -lot p g g �plat is for single dwellings. The plat is west of Laurie Road on Bnngham Street. (See ma the s onpg a es 2 and 3 and the final plat on page 5.) The developer p started building this project in April 1993. BACKGROUND September 14, 1992: The City Council approved a land use plan change, the vacation of three undeveloped streets and an undeveloped alley and the Northwood Village preliminary plat. The land use plan change was from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density). This preliminary plat was for 24 single -dwelling lots. (See the preliminary plat on page 4 and the preliminary plat conditions on page 6.) DISCUSSION The developer has met all the conditions that the Council required to approve the final plat. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Northwood Village final plat. go/b-4:memo35e.mem (10) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Final Plat 5. 9-14-92 Council minutes 1�- i AIIUVA ter new COPE CT C AV 6 . COPE A LARK AV RK--- 211 .j ..... CD cc w < of ARM R D L Ic CO D R D w66d RD HURST FkZZ 25 ir LELAND SAN/ Ir AV Z w w CO RD "6" o JUNCTION ST ftbirAood AV(1) CHAMSMS ST E AVcRACECr cn ELDRIDG 8 W C#yHoll ONT AV a A t!. 60 M5 BELMONT SKI w > ILLMANI AV AV 00000 RIS A coo N ROSEWOO D 10 AN RY-. A/ S AV TRA IL - Flk*Ar H z }. in pN Pit 28 00C)ft ot AWV FROST 6 G - gun) or a w E TONAV w W Gbifer S ME R AY w SLIM w QP t; Cr FRISWE AV A ?% w w ot 121 aRIPLEY z owzRI LEY A N z F- W U) x w KIN= A At IA AV %S111 LA CEPRIC z M lax: < J <PRICE cc j W .... 0 .'. ........ .. . L % . . .. ........................ ........... . .... .. ....... LA R 7juFt-, 30 62 s� s5 LOCATION MAP ............. ............. SITE .............. ts Attachment I j C ir 9 3: 0 EDG E HILL RD 0111 r 2 w -XIO y k a W (1) CONNOR AV w DIE MONT AV0 co r.� 2 B Aft �, EEL XTANT ur roSeasom T AV Ix P* VA IS AV 401 1 < GERVAIS GE &S, GERM low U GR0VAEW z AV z CT m. VIKING A oR R A RR AV 1�- i AIIUVA ter new COPE CT C AV 6 . COPE A LARK AV RK--- 211 .j ..... CD cc w < of ARM R D L Ic CO D R D w66d RD HURST FkZZ 25 ir LELAND SAN/ Ir AV Z w w CO RD "6" o JUNCTION ST ftbirAood AV(1) CHAMSMS ST E AVcRACECr cn ELDRIDG 8 W C#yHoll ONT AV a A t!. 60 M5 BELMONT SKI w > ILLMANI AV AV 00000 RIS A coo N ROSEWOO D 10 AN RY-. A/ S AV TRA IL - Flk*Ar H z }. in pN Pit 28 00C)ft ot AWV FROST 6 G - gun) or a w E TONAV w W Gbifer S ME R AY w SLIM w QP t; Cr FRISWE AV A ?% w w ot 121 aRIPLEY z owzRI LEY A N z F- W U) x w KIN= A At IA AV %S111 LA CEPRIC z M lax: < J <PRICE cc j W .... 0 .'. ........ .. . L % . . .. ........................ ........... . .... .. ....... LA R 7juFt-, 30 62 s� s5 LOCATION MAP ............. ............. SITE .............. ts Attacruri,ien,c r - 64) (63) 4x 18 X.: if X 010 TREET VACATED::::::::::: Al 09 7 ..... .... 140 QD LJ 0 (a ALLEY VACATED 6-22-92 r .__o• Lz_(0j X F -A X X -X ....... ..... 14 X.: -12+8. 47 10) x -:4 .......... :OX. z I 0 14 .7 ` / XY: X 4 uj (7 -zj5A67 UN REET VACATED" I 5.0 7- (5 7) ...... 6 -X )4ao 17 z RiAo: 4 00 .... ..... r r �::�: %Q •, 2204 c0o H .�r �: 1343 m �. :j: . .. ..... ...... x Xk: :} 19 s STREET VACATEDJ .4 J: X4 CGLS l b s�5 Z) �O _j 3 R� 6 CC ca 70 IV) 2241 [\- I I 23124 22270< I - 1 4_0 U00 -1z �(9 1419 LARK AVE I r IV i S LAURIE RD ._- I ,21!9140- co X SANDHURST Ito, U -75.5Z5, rip 0 , 4 2181'o 1422 75.1 ( 0 (OL01 f01 9 POND, 1397 14 1• h 15 14 .13 fit 14 A i A (,-334 .7% WA4CIA14_!�r- (\,A) 1423- 2T C) 21 23 JA 2 30 Ib 1177 IS )9 20 24" P) , . 7D D. SC HL, DI T. NQ -6 7 d /.,7 a r- IAO 40t Nr 9_ Y ROA D'13 -7& WEAVER SCHOOL 26 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP IL V O rI v 42C 153 - ac . < 10 1357 0 010 0 "5 8) 110 -CORNER• KICK SOCCER . 4./1 r0_4-05) < 06' ot Ilig' 1 I ILI 1� I (59) � J5 M .o oot +1 2.(0'7 -3 ia: -3 2.3 lop, Opened &Poc 162 6944 W2 0/6 4- 137' 60 p" W144790'•0 0, Q m 378 138413921. .1404 1410, 1420, Ci 10 6 (550) (51� �(S�� N e+ 1 4 13,12- 11 10 y49 0#"es l�. 3 __ Aft 0 c 0 7SC 75 3 7 +5 r ^ 2. ............ • 44.0 158.17 17/.04 ALLEY VACATEW.,:X lop 10 19 X,***.:: 2_ 0 2-1 2- Z p_ a 2-4 P.5 64) (63) 4x 18 X.: if X 010 TREET VACATED::::::::::: Al 09 7 ..... .... 140 QD LJ 0 (a ALLEY VACATED 6-22-92 r .__o• Lz_(0j X F -A X X -X ....... ..... 14 X.: -12+8. 47 10) x -:4 .......... :OX. z I 0 14 .7 ` / XY: X 4 uj (7 -zj5A67 UN REET VACATED" I 5.0 7- (5 7) ...... 6 -X )4ao 17 z RiAo: 4 00 .... ..... r r �::�: %Q •, 2204 c0o H .�r �: 1343 m �. :j: . .. ..... ...... x Xk: :} 19 s STREET VACATEDJ .4 J: X4 CGLS l b s�5 Z) �O _j 3 R� 6 CC ca 70 IV) 2241 [\- I I 23124 22270< I - 1 4_0 U00 -1z �(9 1419 LARK AVE I r IV i S LAURIE RD ._- I ,21!9140- co X SANDHURST Ito, U -75.5Z5, rip 0 , 4 2181'o 1422 75.1 ( 0 (OL01 f01 9 POND, 1397 14 1• h 15 14 .13 fit 14 A i A (,-334 .7% WA4CIA14_!�r- (\,A) 1423- 2T C) 21 23 JA 2 30 Ib 1177 IS )9 20 24" P) , . 7D D. SC HL, DI T. NQ -6 7 d /.,7 a r- IAO 40t Nr 9_ Y ROA D'13 -7& WEAVER SCHOOL 26 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP x , �r Tim oo eL � w MZ IIS y�C+� Ib =V . ssz a c K D w w �� e� �=o �i=` •'�j O w V•O �+��. n • `1 N H V w i m r= SOM a •W1K-r w Attachm a b �• O > = 4 Tim c �.� c -'u� r ry v v o �pp� C ►- w� �� W r _ 7 $�v •o_o h.9�o �'n ,s_ � 1 W I 'v t 4 PRELIMINARY PLAT 312l1iD'l I � I 1 I1 i L I I I CD 3AV 1SUtWHONO'S I s 3 cn }W I.{.1 co LL LL j Q j O w 91 — i 1 ui w tO 2,^^ VI W N Y d O O N m a IZ A W _ W 41 J F t 0 W J U O U IEEEZ .� o u D cc W a w W D cc Z O -' V Z 2 > Q Z ZW z run, Oa J � � Q coW d w O CQ 0 Z C Lu 0 4N cc >Q z �y n 3� W V) W G R Om w W y (� O Z .: cc Z J w P W Z Oz~ W J_ O V/''ww i I Z xs:`' 1 w Q �s $• _ IL Q U VCD I to Z; ONS W Q! Q L 01 ! I 1 f Go •A soFt O wm w w � c #� A i 0 M •O rZ i Y 2 2 sZ^ M 0 • y1 2 j lJ��lif� Fase+we..f o q L L.__ �s00)OS '22•F h �' S.Q'9'35'??"E. o -�'• ............. O N � r \ •45•IS' ! t'' i C tV � •t• .�'� 1 •risW• �rG>it'r L•L98.�I C.•irs'r!. r C V'f n r► p � L.:? - S79`oo__�+y�•... ti .�,:.o� s \o � P` I,I,Q ?v p <- C�•J �.e.4b s•::.......�. •+ � :• \�o Ldp! •14 Y� r w c • a. Sy q,i• rl LsC;�'�hA w Nw•�! N �•..`:>c ase,c r--�� �•E - J • fu . n,� m ; �`. •yam •21:21 � 0 r) • t• - 1 i • • 1 • S � Q + tet` Q � s r O .. R !� •� I LLEY O �'O A 1' f� • Vi.l^ ATE` ' 30'00'4E O "I -_r `.4.96 - _ IQ Qgo + •� Off► n ••�% �•�• � 12 10 ~p tlPt • N 1'ji/••30'CO"E- _ --� w n _ii MI r« 0 • s� r--/ii9i--- • Z� M g 1G ♦ �J J t r . 1 �; . r- `><-i .0 Q tfi': _ %! 1 •' r. r-!1 Z If8•!•3 c M': • f�tM•9d•'sf3• 1 - •oo'oo� - - - ,� .►LAURIE =i9. Dpi +52.4i - - - - o i-1► c _° - gf)•1•ttl F't �T- „f%fP a a +C _ 142. ate • ;'k ° C tic .^ r..� 1 --� • ; '"���,~ = i�1'. +'•o a c �o04��• � •) / i Vol t �► Q s fv ..• � � _�lty3o'oo+E• - - - - - _ � . :. �+'�,p� : 1. •'�yg2' �: .'j . r_ _ _ I , 516:'• \ / wrz At-tc-7..chment 4 W 06 I ? 1 tl �: 110 IE r� r� V.; t . �dp • S 87 �4 28"E 100. 1 0 r t11 • I Q at 0 ; ry N ! •. 0 < A. ' /AO r ALLEY 'pO'� 1c+ " o ryo ,�:= 0 �1`i . i Vs• CI : E'. 1 s � � q s _ ✓1 _ r. 1 �- 7 _ ► �. ^� 00 •�O ;per 1 o G&W to IJ- _ •..:.. �• � T 'ti I 'J t6'pp',.y S Q ?ti N)1 0 -1.., N T•: .. s N ?oma ems• •�. v W p C' � -.4 CD �; o :G 1 ml .,;e3 4-� 0vp L - - i 3'1 14Y164.03 r lfito.B1 � rb Jr. N i= tiLl:ist r• Ili'��s3''SZ"�✓- .1i G.Vi?(_'ir11 iLL'; ti r • • 'J.Dratnage rnd yti/itIV Z'4F9fe/nCJ7 t w i 1 I f i •i •fir D � 1wO w 4 • �'6 � � A � ? a i++i» MNMN ' N?wM SE! •�aa' fa a• .ai.� w9 -•O �9 + • NNY' N � ' My .• 1.•• .M •• g• X w� s are L" 1 r+ Am Mme- ; yA f•a7 f M PROPOSED FINAL PLAT i Attachment 5 , i held a public c hearing on September 14, 1992. City 3 . The City Counc1 P notices to ubl fished a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent staff p he Council ave abutting property owners as required by law. T 9 the 9 P P everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written i statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this Vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 1-22, Block 3, Sabin Addition to Gladstone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described bove-described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City has no plans to build an alley in this location., The 16 developer will be dedicating new street rights-of-way on the final pl at. This vacation is subject to the retention of a drainage and utility easement over the alley. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Preliminary Plat 1. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Northwood Village preliminary plan -subject to the fol ,1 owi na conditions l The City Engineer approving final 9radi ng, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans. The developer shall increase the size of the water main to eight inches on the utility plan. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. 2. The developer shall sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that, the developer will complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. This agreement shall include the developer having NSP install up to three street lights at the discretion of the City Engineer. 3. The Director of Eomunity Development approving a tree plan, based on the City*s environmental protection ordinance. The Director must approve this plan before the developer does any site grading or the City approves the final plat. 4. Show drainage and ut i 1 i ty easements along all property lines. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. P y 9-14-92 5. nes on Lots 2 3 and 4 . This change shall Change the property .1 i . Laurie Road and . er lines are end�cular to be so the property P P radial to the lde Street cul-de-sac. � . .between Lots 20 and 21. This change Change the property line hall tie so property erty line is radial to the cul-de-sac. P s 7. Change the name of Laurie Avenue to Laurie Road. 8. garages es on Lots 1 Remove the house and two 9 .and 2. gr, Remove the house garage e on Lots 17 and 19. 9 10. • he transition Dint with the cul-de- Change the right-of--way at t P saes to meet City standards. 11. • drainage easement parallel to County Showa 30 w� de utility i ty and dra g Road 8 on Lot 7. Seconded by Counc•lmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmernber: � Carlson, Zappa Hays - Counc i 1 members Juker, Ros sbacl 9-14-92 7 ,. AGENDA NO. �—S' AGENDA REPORT fiction by Council Endorsed - TO: City Manager Modified Re j ec-ted...,,,�. r �' vl FROM: Assistant City Manageral'fCVIZAA Date RE: ACCEPTANCE OF COMMUNITY CENTER BID PACKAGE #1 DATE: July 4, 1993 INTRODUCTION The Ci Council awarded Bid Package # 1: Clearing and Grubbing of the Community City Center site to F.M. Frattalone Excavating on March 22, 1993. The construction manager and the architect have inspected the site and determined that the contract has been completed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept Bid Package #1 as complete and authorize final payment to F.M. Frattalone in the amount of $8,285.70. RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF BID PACKAGE #1: COMMMUNITY CENTER CLEAR. AND GRUB CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Construction Manager and the Architect for the City of Maplewood have determined that the Community Center Project Bid Package #1: Clear and Grub is complete and recommend acceptance of the contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Community Center Project Bid Package #1: Clear and Grub is complete, and the work is accepted by the City. Release of final payment of $8,285.70 is hereby authorized. CERTIFICATE OF Distribution to: OWNER � SUBSTANTIAL ARCHITECT � COMPLETION FIONDTRACTOR o AIA DOCUMENT G704 OTHER CA Construction Manager: McGough Construction PROJECT: Maplewood Community Center ARCHITECT: AKRW Architects, P.A. (name, address) ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 92076.00 TO (Owner) : CONTRACTOR: F.M. Frattal one City of Maplewood CONTRACT FOR: Si to Cleaning & Grubbing 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 .15th of April CONTRACT DATE. p DATE OF ISSUANCE: June 30, 1993 PROJECT OR DESIGNATED PORTION SHALL INCLUDE: Bid Package #1: Site Preparation The Work performeCI under this Contract has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. The Date of Substantial Completion of the Project or portion thereof designated above is hereby established as June 30, 1993 which is also the date of commencement of applicable warranties required by the Contract Documents, except as stated below. DEFINITION OF DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION The Date of Substantial Completion of the Work or designated portion thereof is the Date certified by the Architect when construction is sufficiently complete, in accordance with the Contract Documents, so the Owner can occupy or utilize the Work or designated portion thereof for the use for which it is intended, as expressed in the Contract Documents. A list of items to be completed or corrected, prepared by the Contractor and verified and amended by the Architect, is attached hereto. The failure to include any items on such list does not alter the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all Work' in accordance with the Contract Documents. The date of commencement of warranties for items on the attached list will be the date of final payment unless otherwise agreed to in writing. ARCHITECT AKRW Architects, P.A. ,lam dt BY Marianne Repp-O'Brien, AIA 72 of 73 DATE The Contractor will complete or correct the Work on the list of items attached hereto within two weeks days from the above Date of Substantial Completion. /- CONTRACTOR rat a one &,, o s DATE The Owner accepts the Work or designated portion thereof as substantially complete and will assume full possession thereof at (time) on (date). OWNER City of Maplewood BY Gretchen Maglich 1-111-2, q3 DATE The responsibilities of the Owner and the Contractor for security, maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work and insurance shall be as follows: Not applicable (Note—Owners and Contractors legal and insurance counsel should determine and review insurance requirements and coverage, Contractor shall secure consent of surety company, if any.) Construction Manager: McGough Construction By: Ma k Adamson D to AIA DOCUMENT G704 CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION APRIL 1978 EDITION AIA® © 1978 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 G704 1978 The folowing list is an attachment to the Certificate of Substantial Completion for the Maplewood Community Center Bid Package #1, dated June 30, 1993. The Contractor Is required to correct and/or complete all work as Indicated herein per the conditions Indicated on the certificate of Substantial Completion, E DA Remove trees on inside on fence line on east side of side. Approximately six trees have not yet been removed. a 2. Remove broken tree limb hanging over fence line on east side of side. 3. Remove light standard lying on south end of site. 4. Remove fuel oil tank on north end of site. 5. Remove bituminous entrance pads, if required by future bid Packages. END OF PUNCH LIST APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOW4M*MENT AIA DOCUMENT 6702 (Instructions on reverse side) PACE OvF- OF PIVIES TO (OWNER) : CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 E CO RD B MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 FROM (CONTRACTOR): FM FRATTALONE EXCAVATING & GRADING, INC. 3066 SPRUCE STREET ST PAUL MN 5517 PROJECT: MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY REC CENTER BID PKG #1 `'IA (ARCHITECT): MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 2737 FAIRVIEW AVE N ST PAUL 55113-1372 APPLICATION NO: FINAL Distribution to: F] OWNER PERIOD T06/25/93 [.1 ARCHITECT [__] CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT'S C� PROJECT NO: (_? CONTRACT- FOR: BID PKG 1 CONTRACT DATE: Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION EOR PAYMENT Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month 82 763.00 Number Date Approved 1 4/28/93 TOTALS (Column G on G703) 763.00 Net change by Change Orders (763-00) The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: FM FRATTALONE EXCAVATING & GRADING, INC . I3y:`'-��� `' Date': JUNE 25 , 1993 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief the Werk has progressed as indicated, the duality of the Work is in accordance with the C-mitract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT C[R-TIFIED. AIA DOCUMENT G702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFIC'AIT FE 41-11 AMERICAN INSTITUTF OF ARC:I-11T[-("Ts, 1735 NEW Y :-:-i; :I;- -1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ....................... $ 83 ,9 620.00 (763-00) 2. Net e thang y b Change Orders ..................... $ 82 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2) .............. $ 9857.00 823,857-00 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ............ $ (Column G on G703) 5. RETAINAGE: 0.00 a. 0/) of Completed Work $ (Column D + E on G703) b. `% of Stored Material $ (Column F on G703) Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or 0.00 Total in Column I of G703) ..................... $ 82 85 7.00 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ................... $ , (Line 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR 74,571-30 PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate) ......... 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................... $--�–�--- $8,1 ---��-- 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE ............. $ (Line 3 less Line 6) County of: RAMSEY C`•i.NCii W n Lt O&RANU h is M 25TH day of JUNE J9 93 b"QTAAY PUSUC-MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY r 10-12-8 ----------- 0� AMOUNT CERTIFIED ................................. $ --- (Attach explanation if arnount certified differs from the amount a[)E)hed for.) ARCHITECT: Date.— E3y��_ This Certificate is riot riegotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment. a " - . ce of payment are withr)ut prejudice to any rights of the Ovv�.n 0 n . -5r u�nxfer this Contract. )R PAYS I-N'T • MAY 1983 EDITION • ;SIA° • c 198i A" C)RK AWN[IF, N.W., WA( FHINGTON, D.C. 20006�j �� WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright laws and is subject to legal prosec} tion. G702-1983 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Environmental Health Official SUBJECT: 934 Evar Street DATE: July 15, 1993 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed.. ..,�. Modif i ed. -- Re j ectec Dat e,�. The Council asked for a report on 934 Evar Street each meeting through July. Lorraine Syring owns this house. She is elderly and no longer able to communicate. Ms. Syring lives in the house with her daughter, Barbara Gatzke, and Ms. Gatzke's five children. The children are between approximately ten and twenty years old. I am reporting on the outside the house. The police department has handled the problems inside the house, such as animals and garbage. BACKGROUND This property has a long history of problems. In the past thirteen years, we have received reoccurring complaints about junk, garbage, junked cars and problems inside the house. I have issued many orders to clean the property up. In 1986, I issued a citation. Ms. Gatzke has always cleaned up the yard after I issued orders to her. Eventually, however, the yard returns to its usual condition. DISCUSSION I inspected the property on July 15. There were toys and construction materials in the yard. Having toys in a yard is not a Code violation. The construction materials are for a deck the owner is building. The carpenters plan to remove the materials when they are done. They have a permit. RECOMMENDATION No action is required. go/b-4:evar3.mem MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Real Estate Sign ordinance DATE: July 16, 1993 INTRODUCTION nd,orse Modif -Rejecte The City Council required a public hearing on part of the real estate sign ordinance. BACKGROUND ,Tune 8, 1992: The City Council changed the real estate sign code. Subsection 36- 307(12) (c) requires that "The sign owner shall remove the sign within seven calendar days after the lease, rental or closing date of the real estate that the sign is advertising. The Council required a public hearing to review this subsection in one year. (See the ordinance on page 2.) DISCUSSION We have had no complaints about this ordinance. We have had complaints from a councilmember about signs that violated the ordinance. I invited Karen Christofferson from the St. Paul Board of Realtors to the meeting. She can explain her efforts to educate Realtors about this requirement. RECOMMENDATION Take no action. go\b-5:signcode.mem (5.4) Attachment: Real Estate Sign Ordinance J y a ORDINANCE NO. 703 = AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE REGULATIONS FOR REAL ESTATE SIGNS The Maplewood City Council approves t ° Code Pp he following changes to the Maplewood of Ordinances: p d Section 1. This section changes sec - g tion 36 230 (Definitions) by adding def�n�, tions of billboard, round s� g g sign and .real estate sign -and adding two new definitions as follows: Billboard: A sign that advertises a product, event, person, institution activity, business, service or subject not ? located on the premises on which said sign is located. This definition s not include an off-site real- hall estate sign of sixty-four (64)square feet or less.q Ground sign: A sign attached to or than placed on the ground, rather a building° Off-site real estate sign: Areal e • state sign that advertises a lot group of lots or premises upon which the sign is not located. On-site real .estate sign: . .A real estate sign that advertises th lot, group of lots or premises upon e p which the sign is located. Real estate sign: A sign advertisin real g the sale, lease or rental of estate. Section 2. This section changes section on 36-272 as follows: Sec. 36-272. Freestanding signs. i ns . (a) A freestanding sign shall be at least ten (10-) feet from a lot line, other than a street right-of-way. (b) A freestanding sign shall comply with the sight triangle requirements in section 29-136. (c) A freestanding sign shall not project over public property or right-of-way, except where specifically allowed in this chapter. Section 3. This section changes section 36-307(12) and (13) as follows: (12) On-site real estate signs, subject to the following requirements: a. For sirtg1e or double -dwell ing lots, there shall be no more than one such. sign along each street that the lot fronts on. The maximum sign area shall benine(9) square feet. Such signs may be on the right-of-way, but shall be no closer than eight (8) feet to the edge of a street or two (2) feet to a sidewalk or trail. b. For all other types of property, the combined area of all such signs fronting upon each street which bounds such lot or group of lots shall not exceed a ratio of one square foot of sign area for each one thous g and (1,000) square feet of lot area. No one sign, however, shall exceed sixty-four (64) square feet. No person shall q p 1 place such a sign on a public right-of-way. c. The sign owner shall remove the sign within seven en ( cal en ar days after the lease, rental or closing date of the real estate that the sign is advertising. d. A sold sign, used in conjunction with the for sale sign, may only be displayed for a total period of thirty (30) days during each listing contract. (13) Off-site real estate signs, subject to the following requirements: a. Off-site real estate signs of three (3) square feet or less may be placed on the public right-of-way. No part of such signs shall be closer than eight (8) feet to a street pavement or two (2) feet to a sidewalk or trail. The City shall only allow such signs from 12:00 Noon until 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and from 6:00 a.m. on Saturday until 8:00 p.m. on the last day of a weekend. The City may dispose of any such signs that violate the requirements in subsection 36- 307(13)(a). b. The City shall only allow off-site real estate signs of more than three square feet that advertise housing developments. Each housing development shall have no more than one such sign. The maximum area of any such sign shall be sixty-four (64) square feet. If the sign is for a for -sale development, the sign owner shall remove the sign when at least ninety (90) percent of the dwelling units approved by the City have been built. If the sign is for rental units, the sign owner shall remove the sign when ninety (90) percent or more of the units have been 'rented. Such signs shall not be on the public right-of-way. Section 4. This ordinance shill take effect after its passage, the provision of Section 36-307(12)(c) will be reviewed at a public hearing one year after the date of passage. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Maplewood City Council invites you to a public hearing. This hearing is to review the part of the City code about real estate signs. The Council will hold this hearing on Monday, July 26, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers (1830 East County Road B), Call Geoff Olson at 770-4562 for more information. Sign language interpreters are available. You must request this service at least 96 hours in advance. Call 770-4524 to make arrangements. PUBLISH: July 14, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstnd, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review LOCATION: 586 Carlton Street PROJECT: Kinderberry Dill Day Care Center Addition DATE: July 14, 1993 INTRODUCTION Request 6- a Action bar Cou.nci3 V Endorsed t. Modified, z'. 4 i ,. e j eeted�, Nola R. Kreml, of Kinderberry Hill III, is asking for a conditional use permit (CUP) and design review. Ms. Kreml is proposing to add onto the Kinderberry Hill Child Development Center. The City Code requires a CUP to build within fifty feet of a residential lot line. The addition would be 27'4" from the residential lot line to the east. (Refer to the site plan on page 10 and the letter on page 11.) Project Description The applicant proposes to do the following: 1. Build a 1,798 -square -foot addition on the building's east side. The addition would be for classrooms and an office. 2. Remove a storage building and fence behind the building. 3. Remove the existing trash enclosure at the northeast corner of the site and construct a new one at the southeast corner of the lot. 4. Close their north curb cut on Carlton Street. The pavement behind the building would remain as a play area. 5. Put in sod and plantings between the proposed addition and the east lot line. 6. Stripe 16 new parking spaces. BACKGROUND Past Action February 25, 1991: The City Council approved a conditional use permit to allow the 3M 'training Facility to build their parking lot in the rear yards of 607-629 Ferndale Street. w Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36-442(a) of City Code states that the City Council may approve a CUP based on nine standards for approval. (See conditions one through nine in the resolution on page 13.) Section 36-28(c)(7) states that the City Council may approve a CUP to allow an addition within a required setback if: 1. The required findings in Section 36-442 for a CUP are met. 2. The setback would be consistentwiththe setbacks for surrounding properties. 3. At least 80% of the addition would be screened from property that is used or shown on the City's land use plan for residential use. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit This proposal meets the findings for a CUP. The existing trees would screen the entire addition from the homes to the east. The proposed addition would have a greater setback from the homes to the east than the adjacent 3M training facility. The 3M J g ty building is 17 feet closer to the homes than the proposed Kinderberry Addition. There is also an unusually large setback from the property line to the homes. Because of this large setback, the Council allowed 3M to build their parking lot in the rear yards of the P g adjacent homes. Fire Code Requirements The applicant must provide access to the fire department hose connection (FDC) on the building. This connection is presently on the northeast corner of the building behind the proposed addition. The Fire Marshal met with the applicant's architect and they agreed that the applicant would do one of the following: 1. Move the FDC and the outside fire alarm to the front of the building at the southwest corner, or 2. Close the north curb cut and sod next to the addition as proposed. The applicant must, however, keep the aggregate -base under these sections of asphalt as support for emergency vehicles. 2 RECOMMENDA110N A. Adopt the resolution on page 13.. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for an addition to 586 Carlton Street. The permit allows the addition to encroach into the required -foot setback. we are recommending this permit based on the findings required by Code. The permit would ;be subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City. stamped May 25, 1993. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes and should ensure that construction does not encroach into the wetland. 2. The proposed construction must .be substantially started within one year after the Council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The Council may grant up to one one-year extension of the permit. 3. The City Council shall not review this permit unless a problem develops. B. Approve the plans (stamped May 25, 1993) for building addition to Kinderberry Hill Day Care at 586 Carlton Street. The property owner shall do the following: 1. Provide a 15 -foot setback from the front lot line for the remag blacktop after the removal of the curb cut. (code requirement) The applicant shall sod the 15 -foot setback and the adjacent boulevard. 2. Install a handicap -parking sign for each handicap -accessible parking space. 3. Screen any new roof -mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code requirement) 4. Construct the trash dumpster enclosure as City Code requires. The enclosures must match the calor of the building and have a closeable gate. The enclosure walls and gate shall extend to the ground to contain litter. The design is subject to Staff approval. (code requirement) 5. Landscape east of the trash enclosure. This landscaping is subject to Staff approval. 6. Do one of the following, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval: a. Move the FDC and the outside fire alarm to the front of the building at the southwest corner, or 3 b. Close the north curb cut and sod next to the addition as proposed. The applicant must, however, keep the aggregate -base that is under these sections of asphalt as support for emergency vehicles. 7. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any requiredwork that is not completed by occupancy. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The property owner shall give the Staff an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. 4 CfTIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed owners of the 23 properties within 350 feet of this property. The owners replied from nine properties. Five were m favor, one objected and three had no comment. In Favor 1. Such an addition can only benefit the community. (Capitol City Investment, 246 Albert Street, St. Paul) 2. My yard is open to this parking lot. I do not want any trees planted or any screening across the back of my yard to block my view of the 3M complex to the west. Please move the proposed dumpster from where it is proposed. Dumpsters lead to litter which would get into my yard and enclosures can be unsightly. (Stroeing, 561 Ferndale Street) Staff reply: There is no additional landscaping proposed behind 561 Ferndale Street. Staff is recommending that the City Council require landscaping to screen the dumpster enclosure and that the enclosure walls and gate extend to the ground to stop litter from blowing out. The existing landscaping would also stop trash from spreading. Opposed I believe in enforcing strict zoning laws. It is acceptable as it exists. (Stowman., 2534 Minnehaha Avenue) Miscellaneous Comment We live south of this area and this change will not directly affect us. We do not like the trend of businesses infringing on our neighborhood. We would be opposed to any changes on the lot south of Kinderberry Hill. (Mohwinkel, 529 Ferndale Avenue) REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.91 acres Existing land use: Kinderberry Hill Child Development Center SURROUNDING LAND USES North: 3M Company training facility South: An undeveloped commercial lot and the U.S. West building West: Carlton .Street and 3M Company East: Single dwellings PLANNING Land Use Plan and zoning designation: BC(M) -business commercial (modified) PAST ACTIONS October 5, 1992: The City Council approved an addition to Yocum Oil (2719 Stillwater Road) . The addition encroached into the fifty -foot setback from a residential district. The addition matched the setback of the existing building. The neighbor did not want the addition screened. September 21, 1992: The Council approved an addition to Sairack's Liquor Store (2305 Stillwater Road). The addition encroached into the fifty -foot setback from a residential district. The addition matched the setback of the existing building and the existing trees screened the addition from the residential district. go\b-S:kinberry.mem (36) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map . 3. Property Line/Zoning Map 4. Site Plan S. Applicant's written explanation 6. Resolution 7. Plans stamped May 25, 1993 (separate attachment) 101 o:s E MARYLAND 418 • o %se Oso - . CASE AVE. n32 C; ®. ,. • z 0 OL)SH AVE sa el34- so ci OPoe % 4b ire Is. we CONWAY ,too Is 209 Cd 'to cc. art 207 10• 2 201 230 mo • W So e* ,b fti-m 41b% so* .so 046 so .: OL se UPPER AFM • 3 SEVEMOLE 4 DoGrAr LA pw1 5 COUGH 4AHAWTHORNE el•0. AVE3' E. 6V CROSEJ a Se AVE. v F.: �� `,; GEuRwAtWV E. t9 PLlb so % ZI NO AVE Z z L LA. BRAND AVE so E. T. $T. ci wso o6o's E. MINNEHAMA MARGARET AVE L L 5 w ST. Ix z z EM — ONT - w AVE. TAGS RD so Oto Tanners Lake r —c LT I \CT/ Ole 0 410 /1 R -3(H) I w --1 SC(M)- =j BC ---- BEAVER LAKE LAND USE PLAN 8 Attachment 2 Ivy Ave. R -z R -3(H) .= FI -3(M) -:;�arytand Ave, Stillwater Rd. :�w D ...Moc(M -+harvester. Ave. P- C SCR ;-8C �v _ .ac Lsc =Minnehaha Ave. 8C LBC 4*,%.os a� E Conway Ave. rchanBe #--B 4 ,77 ) I 621 ' N--- — 613 -- - -- 1 . 3M TRAINING 17 607 " t Q-- • . FACILITY -, 143.7 0 q V • • — E Y aii sit Zs a. cc Ni • — � • KINDERBERRY HILL 3 5 r - M J - 4 11571 0 dlp 17 S 551— t28) - y wt • - �D G557 1 o (27) / 7 549 s 298.c M3 aIc 6 (p) B8 :• 537 529 loft sow 9N Nor AMA- Vl� l r i N` -..-- -- --- --- - '. Oi t♦z� 3 0 :AlU.SWEST _ Fla63} •3311!� . oS C6 - Is uI ,.�,+N J r N . _ 14 cc 4"1 '�_ �� 4- r .,gip .• 1�3 - , r � � � p r �f ` ' � „a,• _ Z(,5 �, � 105 8 �, � - _ ` �� I tb ' I AV L07 ! ' _ 5 5 Ft. •Cswn't for St. h4?8 sv 3 ��9 . •� - _ 5 5 .,,,�4? • .ri 1 / �► j P E NL C norm143 e - 5 • Si '� /S,,,g '� ',,.� .',,��► K_L��El..7L. — CONWAY AVE -3_- _ , •�7.2 134.b ♦ " .�. s wl .r/,?nom • �,-.is�. --• PROPERTY -LINE /ZONING MAP PROPOSED CURB CUT TO BE CLOSED Attachment 4 3M TRAINING FACILIIY 0 W 561 FERNDALE STREET BACKYARD PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE Attachment 5 Blumentalsf o� Once 6205 Earle Brown Drive • Suite 120 • Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430-2150 • (612) 561-5757 • FAX (612) 561-2914 May 20, 1993 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR KINDERBERRY HILL 586 Carlton Street, Maplewood, Minnesota A. REQUEST We respectfully request approval of reducing existing setback from Residential property on the east side 'from 51 feet to 28 feet. Be THE INTENDED USE OF THE PROPERTY AND WHY THE CITY SHOULD APPROVE THIS REQUEST i, The use of the property is a day care facility now., and the new addition is proposed so that the facility can continue to operate as such on reasonable financial basis. The new addition will increase allowable capacity of the facility by approximately 36 children and this will improve the financial feasibility of the facility. 2. The proposed addition will insure that the existing use is maintained - Day care is a needed and a very good use between Commercial and Residential uses. y 3. The proposed addition will increase the property value of this facility and will not depreciate property values of ' any other adjacent properties. 4. The proposed addition will not be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property. S. The proposed addition would generate only minimal additional vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing streets. In fact, we propose to eliminate one curb cut. S, The proposed addition will be served by existing adequate public facilities and services. No new services will be required. 7, The proposed addition will not create any additional costs for public facilities or services. 11 8. The proposed addition will maximize and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features: One existing, long -driveway together with one curb cut will be eliminated and new landscaped area together with new hard surface play area will be added to enhance existing wooded areas on adjacent properties, 9. The proposed addition will not cause any adverse environmental effects, C, WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION FOR ONE DEVIATION FROM THE CITY CODE 1. The setback of 50 feet required by the City Code should not apply to this proposed addition because of its unique nature: a. The use of the facility is Day Care and is very compatible with the Residential use. b. The proposed layout eliminates traffic next to the Residential properties and provide landscaped area instead. 2. The proposed addition will insure that the existing Day Care use is maintained on this property and this is consistent with the purpose of the City Code. 3. The proposed layout and the addition would produce a development of equal or superior quality to that which would result from strict adherence to the provisions of the Code. The only other possible location of the addition would be on the north side, but that is not feasible because: a. Would destroy and reduce existing large play area. b, The layout of the existing building is such that does not allow for any expansion toward north. C. Would not provide a possibility to increase landscaped area. d. Would not provide a possibility to provide a new hard surface play area. 4. The deviation would not constitute any threat to the property values, safety, health or general welfare of the owners or occupants of nearby land. 5. The deviation is required for reasonable and practicable physical development and are not required solely for financial reasons: a. See item 3 above.. I b. The existing building is a remodeled health fitness facility, and as such, needs additional expansion to operate as a reasonably sized Day Care. C., The proposed addition will insure that the existing Day Care can stay in this building. d. The Day Care is a needed use for the community. 12 Attachment 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Nola R. Kreml of Kinderberry Hill III applied for a conditional use permit to expand a building into a required setback. The addition would be 274" from the adjoining residential property line. City Code requires at least 50 feet. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 586 Carlton Street. The legal description is: Lot One, Block Two, Carlton Place, Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On July 6, 1993, the Planning Commiss41 ion recommended that the City Council this permit. 2. The City Council held a. public hearing on , 1993. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the property owners within 350 feet. The Council gave everyone ' at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 13 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parrs. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The setback would be consistent with the setbacks for surrounding properties. 11. At least 80% of the addition would be screened from property that is used or shown on the City's land use plan for residential use. Approval is sub# ect to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped May 25, 1993. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes and should ensure that construction does not encroach into the wetland. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the Council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The Council may grant up to one one-year extension of the permit. 3. The City Council shall not review this permit unless a problem develops. Adopted , 1993. 14 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEIINOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 69 1993 I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson dahl called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. il. ROLL CALL Commissioner S wry Allenspach Pres Commissioner Ro er Anitzberger Pres t Commissioner Lest Axdahl Preent Commissioner Lo e Fischer sent Conunissioner Jack st went Commissioner Gary G ke esent Commissioner Kevin Ki 'dge Absent Commissioner Mary M Present Commissioner Gary Pears n Present Commissioner William Ros ba Present Commissioner Marvin Si gm dik Absent 111. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. June 7,1993 Commissioner ,X993 Commissioner Fis er moved pproval of the minutes of June 7, 1993 as submitted. Commissioner actin seconded Ayes --all The motion sed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commission Fischer moved approval of e agenda as submitted. Commissio er Rossbach seconded yes --all The mo ' n passed. V. NEW BUSINESS A. Conditional Use Permit: 5$6 Carlton St. (Kmderberry Hill) Secretary Olson presented the staff report. No one was present at this meeting representing Kinderberry Hill. There was no one in the audience who wished to speak regarding this request. Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 7-6-93 Commissioner Rossbach suggested that precautions be taken during construction, since the trash enclosure: is proposed next to the wetland. Commissioner Fischer moved the Plarming Commission recommend adoption, of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for an addition to 586 Carlton Street. The permit allows the addition to encroach -into the required fifty -foot setback. We are recommending this permit used on the findings required by code. The permit would be subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped May 25, 1993. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes and shall ensure that the construction not encroach into the wetland. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the Council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The Council may grant up to one one-year extension of the permit. 3. The City Council shall not review this permit unless a problem develops. Comnussioner Rossbach seconded Ayes --all The motion passed. B. Conditional Use Permit: 2633 Stillwater Rd. (Carbones Pizzeria) Ken Roberts, Asso 'ate Planner, presented th staff report. Bill Everhart was present representing Carbo s Pizzeria. Mr. Ever explained that the parking spaces in the rear of the building ould be used for loyees to allow the spaces in front of the building to be used by stomers. Ther ere no comments from the public. Mike Rammer, of Osceoi Wiscons' said he is the owner of the building. Mr. Rammer asked staff to er expl any requirements for construction of the dumpster enclosure. Mr. er ' cussed with the director of public works what kind of installation the City o s regarding the concrete curb. Commissioner Fischer moved Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which approves con ' 'onal use permit for a take out/delivery restaurant at 2627-2633 Stillwater ad. We e recommending this permit based on the findings required by the 'ty code. e permit would be subject to the following conditions: 1. By the end of Og''tober 1993, the applicant or property owner shall: a. Install concrete curbing from the curb on Ferndale Street around the buildings sign and then back to the front of the building. Community Design Review Board y Minutes of July 14, 1993 J 4- V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Si Plan Chan e - Birch Run Station g Secretary d explained the staff report for this requested sign plan change. Welsh Comp 'es, Inc. is asking that the City ange the Birch Run Station sign plan, because e Famous Footwear sign d s not meet the current or proposed sign criteria. Th are requesting an exc tion to the new criteria the Design Board recommended ap oval of recently. N representative was present for Welsh Companies, Inc. Th Board membe agreed that the present sign placement for Famous Footwear is ogical and 1 ks attractive. Boardmember Thomps me changing Condition Fo 0 4. Tenants canopy. These ;rpy shy on a raceway. hei tion sto Vi. DESIGN REVIEW the Community Design Review Board recommend Birch Run Station sign criteria as follows: shall be limited to one sign on the front fascia of the 1 be neon or constructed of individual letters, mounted t shall not exceed 42 inches. � Signs shall not be closer s to eithersidh of the tenant's store front. This criteria allows an )r the. Famous Footwear sigg fo, be eight inches from the., right side 's edge, A future sifor the tenant to the north must be at least rom the Famous Foo ear si . when the -Famous Footwear si is new sien shall be at _ ast ten inches from either side of the able Erickson seconded Ayes --all A. Building Addition - Kinderberry Hill Day Care Center, 586 Carlton Street Nola Kreml was present representing Kinderberry Hill III. Janis Blumentals, the architect for the project, was also present. Mr. Blumentals said there would not be any roof equipment on this addition. Chairperson Moe asked for comments from the public, but there were no comments. The Board discussed the proposed placement of trees on the property and the closing of the north curb cut on Carlton Street. Boardmember Thompson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend approval of the plans (stamped May 25, 1993) for building addition to Kinderberry Hill Day Care at 586 Carlton Street. The property owner shall do the following: Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of July 14, 1993 1. Provide a 15 -foot setback from the front lot line for the remaining blacktop after the removal of the curb cut. (code requirement) The applicant shall sod the 15 -foot setback and the adjacent boulevard. 2. Install ahandicap-parking sign for each handicap -accessible parking space. ._ 3. Screen any new roof -mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code requirement) 4. Construct the trash dumpster enclosure as City code requires. The enclosures must match the color of the building and have a closeable gate. The enclosure walls and gate shall extend to the ground to contain litter. The design is subject to staff approval. (code requirement) S. Landscape east of the trash enclosure. This landscaping is subject to staff approval. 6. Do one of the following, subject to the Fire Marshal's approval: a. Move the FDC and the outside fire alarm to the front of the building at the southwest corner, or b. Close the north curb cut and sod next to the addition as proposed. The applicant must, however, keep the aggregate -base that is under these sections of asphalt as support for emergency vehicles. 7. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work that is not completed by occupancy. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The property owner shall give the staff an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. Boardmember Holder seconded Boardmember Anitzberger moved to amend the motion to correct the site plan to show removal of the trees behind 561 Ferndale Street. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes --all The amended motion was voted on. Ayes --all PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Maplewood City Council invites You to a public hearing. This hearing nrg i s about a request for a conditional use permit (CUP) to add onto the Kinderbe Hill Child rry held Development Center. The City code requires a CUP to build within cif tY feet of a residential lot line. The addition would be 27' 4" from the residential lot line to the east. The applicant is Kinderbe Hill 'III. The location is 586 Carlton rlton Street. The Council will hold this hearing on Monday, Jul 26 1993 at 7:15 .m. in the ' . Y � p City Hall Council Chambers (1830 East County Road B), Call Geoff Olson at 770-4562 for more information. Sign language interpreters are available. You must request this service ce at least 96 hours in advance. Call 770-4524 to make arrangements. PUBLISH: July 14, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 2633 Stillwater Road PROJECT: Carbones. Pizzeria DATE: July 12, 1993 INTRODUCTION Request G- 3 Ion by Counell..q1I Endorse Modifie Rejecte Date____-�.�m Mr. Bill Everhart is asking the City to approve a conditional use permit (CUP) for a restaurant. Mr. Everhart is representing Carbones Pizzeria. He is proposing to open a Carbones Pizzeria at 2633 Stillwater Road. (See the maps on pages 8-10.) The City has zoned this site BC(M) (business commercial modified). The City Code requires a CUP for a restaurant in the BC(M) zoning district. Description of Project Carbones would use about 900 square feet for a take out and delivery pizzeria. There would be no seating or table service. Carbones is proposing to have a maximum of six employees working at any time. They are proposing to have the restaurant open from 4-11 p.m. Monday -Thursday, 4 p.m. -1 a.m. Fridays, 11 a.m.-1 a.m. Saturdays and 11 a.m.-11 p.m. on Sundays. Noise from the restaurant should be *n;n;mal because there would not be seating or table .service. Carbones has another restaurant at 2655 White Bear Avenue. (See Mr. Everhart's letter on page 11.) DISCUSSION Traffic Safety Two residents requested afour-way stop at Stillwater Road- and Ferndale Street. These residents are concerned about traffic safety. Ferndale Street has stop signs, but not Stillwater Road. The Director of Public Safety checked the accident record of this intersection from January 1, 1992 through May 1, 1993. During these 16 months, there were six reported accidents at this intersection. These included two with property damage, three with personal injuries and one involving a deer. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) governs stop signs on Stillwater Road. A representative of MnDot told me that this intersection does not meet their requirements for afour-way stop. Building Changes The owner would remodel the building exterior. He Vould: 1. Extend the vinyl siding on 2677 Stillwater Road to cover the existing wood on the front of 2633 Stillwater Road. 2. Add new window moldings on the main window. There is an unenclosed garbage dumpster in the rear parking lot. The City requires enclosures around all trash containers. The City should require a dumpster enclosure as part of this conditional use permit, Off-fteet Paridng There is enough parking to meet the Code requirements. Some of the required parking is in the rear. To help insure enough customer parking, the City should limit employee parking to the rear (north) parking lot. There are no curbs between the parking area and Stillwater Road. The City requires curbs with new parking lots to separate the panting lot from the street and to define driveway entrances. This creates safer access to and from a parking lot. Unfortunately, the building at 2627 Stillwater Road has a setback of about twenty feet from the front property line. To fit in parking stalls, a drive lane and an island with curbing, the building would have to be at least forty feet from the property line. The City Engineer is recommending that new concrete curbing be constructed on this corner. This new curb would run from the existing curb on Ferndale Street around the south side of the building sign and then back to the parking lot's north edge. I have shown this on the site plan on page 10. This curb would create an island that would help control traffic movement around the comer. The new island should have low - height landscaping. The landscaping would improve, the look of the comer and increase the new island's visibility. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 12. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a take-out/delivery restaurant at 2627-2633 Stillwater Road. We are recommending this permit based on the findings required by the City Code. The permit would be subject to the following conditions: 2 1 • B3' October 31, 1993, the applicant or property owner sem: a• Install concrete curbing from the curb on Ferndale Street around the � buil&l8's sign and then back to .the front of the building b. Landscape the new island with lowlanes must approve a plan showing this landscaping.Before planting, the City staff All construction shall follow the site plan City staff prepares on June 23, 1993. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2• The vacant space must be used for stake -out delivery restaurant within one ear after the City Council approves this permit or the �y grant up to one one- �t S� ted• The Council one --year extension of the permit 3. Sweep and stripe the front parking lot to meet current City. Code standards. 4• Install vinyl siding on all of 2633 Stillwater Road. The siding shall match 262 - Stillwater Road. 7 5- Add new window moldings on the main window 6• By October 31, 1993, provide a 100%opaque enclosure around all trash and recycling containers. The design shall meet current City standards. 7• There shall be no cooking odors that are noticeable to adjacent residences, (Code requirement) 8. All employees shall park on the rear (north) parking lot. 9. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. Cn1ZEN COMMENTS We asked the surrounding prope owners for their o inion of ' Y p this request. We sent surveys to the property owners within 350 feet of the site. Out of' 34 properties, we received 16 replies. Eleven replies were for the request, four w ' q were against and one had a comment. Those for this request had the following comments: 1. Good. property use. (Maple Oaks Funeral Home -2585 Stillwater Road) 2. Carbones should be a good business for the community. Hopefully others will see a need for a four way stop sign at the corner of Stillwater Road and Ferndale. Several accidents happen yearly at this intersection. (Domain -2610 Stillwater Road) 3. A four way stop sign on Stillwater Road and Ferndale is long overdue. There have been many serious accidents on this corner and our Council remains silent! (Weinhold-2615 Stillwater Road) 4. It will be nice to have a familiar, stead business tenant in there. Y At present, you never know who is moving in next! (Cooper -2648 Stillwater Road) 5. Improvements are needed on that corner, plus I like pizza! (Hagen -2656 Stillwater Road) 6. We need another pizza parlor, I guess, but I am surprised you are wasting tax payer money on postage and this survey! (Morrison -1111 Ferndale Street) 7. It does not matter to me. (Roy -1112 Ferndale Street) 8. We like Carbones Pizza. (Fletcher -1113 Ferndale Street) 9. It was zoned for a grocery store and restaurant before. (Pepin—Wisconsin) Those against the request had the following comments: 1. Too many young kids would hang out there—trouble. (Broennann-2628 Stillwater Road) 2. This is a residential community on a highway with too much night traffic. This pizza business will only open doors for a larger one in the future. The property should be developed with a small shop, barbershop or business office. (Soderbeck-1030 Ferndale Street) 4 3. Ido object to this proposal because there are already three restaurant pizzas in this neighborhood. Carbones Pizzas are very good, but they are now located near this neighborhood. In the past I objected to Miller's restaurant on this corner, and it has been quite a problem for various situations whereas the police made many. calls. There are various opportunities for eating businesses on Century Avenue. Keep the businesses there. Leave (and keep it so) :comer of Stillwater Road and Ferndale for residential as it should be! (Hendrickson -2670 Stillwater Road) 4. There is no explanation of standards set for- delivery drivers—training and safety precautions. There should be a concerted effort toward training and. observing of driving habits for delivery personnel. (Guertin—Saint Paul) IN One nearby property owner said, "no objections, but I have noticed that this location has a very poor track record for businesses." 5 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 20,566 square feet (0.47 acres). Existing land .uses: 2627 Stillwater Road—A multiple -tenant commercial building 2633 Stillwater Road—Commercial space and four apartment units 2637 Stillwater Road—An eight -unit apartment building SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Residential properties along Ferndale Street East: Multiple dwelling structure at 2637 Stillwater Road South: Single-family homes across Stillwater Road West: A single-family home across Ferndale Street HISTORY April 8, 1985: The City Council changed the land use plan and zoning map for 2627- 2637 Stillwater Road. The land use plan changes were from RL (residential low density) to RB (residential business). The zoning changes were from BC (business commercial) to BC -M (business commercial modified) and R-3 (multiple -family residential). July 31, 1986: City staff approved plans to build a 570 -square -foot two-story addition q �' on the front of 2633 Stillwater Road. The owner never built this addition. PLANNING Existing Land Use Plan designation: BC(M) (business commercial modified) Parking The City Code requires two parking spaces for each apartment unit and one space for every 200 square feet of commercial space. The buildings have four apartments and 1,598 square feet of commercial space (not including the restaurant space). The Code requires a total of 16 spacesfor these areas. The Code also requires one parking space for every 50 square feet of public space in a restaurant. There will be a maximum of six employees working in the restaurant with a maximum of 300 square feet of public space. Thus, the Code requires six parking spaces for the proposed restaurant. The building with the proposed restaurant needs 22 off- street parking spaces. There are now 14 spaces in front of the building and nine spaces lei behind the building for a total of 23 existing parking spaces. Ordinance requirements Section 36-155(c) of the City Code allows the City Council to approve a CUP for a restaurant in the BC(M) zoning district. Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36-442 of the City Code gives nine standards for approving a conditional use permit. (Refer to them in the resolution on page 12.) go/b-S:Carbones (25) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Conditional Use Permit Statement 5. -Conditional Use Permit Resolution 7 Was • lb L"eZ LOCATION MAP Attachment ! �jfryz3too" 20 �o�.ss� �� 2 Lo 1 2 - JS 713 (I )24C (17;) 3 3Jw b 30 (r) v ,► �, � w) ti �3,�� w ego fir - G93 W � (s) ��� �1S �2f� 174`� (27)� o �.e 32,E ` ,� (. Is,3 j 4 2 Sw I 64.i3 w. '� (20 177t^M " IER �►7 5 t •i9s �40 {r7s� Z o a / r°, 6 4w t (30) b • 60 �9 C �� �'�Y }8Z�.5 p J sL , In (tot) �x �� <. a 3 o , �' \ 3 N 7Z vC�a �o �3J AO— 26 fit 4 16 _. Is >,• �B�J� ��''', � Z4 1122; W. 2 31 O (n�) N Com) y� •.9s ��� a' oQ l2 N `^12 23(oa 7 9 ; 63 .S 42.5 �i7s�7 c /o lit IZ `� �� i \ (p) oo&) Cps) N (i OL) •off 81 °�'t 12 9 8 5N 4 T M ��Ls A Q ,� 8, C) . 1112 \ (1+3 I 7 (r�� C�)1 Go AVENUE o I S 2� 5 •28 w I Io o ,3 rho .o `�4s v .V9 ac . ` , . ��-��, , h 2 0 110.6 � C4 -V 1113 _ �,/ \ Z� \ �4 C v� �.a-`' , .cam (44) JE. N� , f r�E \ 22 ,,� p► ,,1Z 3 Its l5 !4 .IJ X10 �+� 6 4 1101: ,. '� as to .s �z. m7 �.... •� 2559 , 20 c�3••l °` 16 !3 W c 5 (1 •� 1091(1313) _ \ /ot. 7M 72.5 1 6z.5 42.s.Gz.3 8.46 • _ -` S ,} O • <4�LO nL opo° ;..�._' 47a(S) ' 2670 J � alas s3 - � _ � •'.�,�`�;::. ``":fir o N �� 2664 C MAPLE OAKS r c �`.' "' O° 2656 2591. 2648 TOTAL • 10.19aa. .,. �� ,. w '� 1� 9} 2642 FUNERAL HOME �h ��► �9 _ s �z Z� 3633 a 2634 030 2628 � O oz 2585 4b3; a� 2610 13 �ti t°° - " ? o r .. K \ooh Off' I 14 +. Z Ao- <58 5 1 R -� .'� �`�P . ���3 ��• Pbo 2588 5 ��• C� �• 94. ►�L�9.n5 � i,�,-per 8• t N Vt4J 3 a+ � � r �o� 9 0� 220 c O 3Z •� \ q; - 2�.5 r 6 Q 1 5 Z Com) -- -- — � � 1 — t� 430 (351 -74w4- 3 10(a) .78 r (1 Z) 0 W i e ` e R � � ► 2 13 o r ; o � � �2i) e►a Isla. CD (1� (14.3c (37) ; V (20)70 �1�► . l�s.. 14 SITE PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP . . �.. Yr,:..:l.F: C�`'C ':'.. n� ....: �J�4r+v . ".Y` ,'R:i). ti, ..'•.'� JV :� _.. ).Sir b x •. . / i • 1 • • - -v o41 r •^ ..-;. 18 z Z ' 0 APT PARKING Attachment 3 PROPOSED CARE Nxaopp-. E S RESTAURANT cv, 00,4 so 960 0.4 CD do 000 .l: ........ 5 ! .4000 ' 000 EXISTING LAN110 DSCAPE AREA 4000 / f PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA r . 1 SITE PLAN 10 .-..,..._; - .. „ -:�•� 7 •. ... ' �:,'"i.l":r...,*.�n a.:f' ;�v s%:ti',.Ti'".Sf.3a:''+.r?r.�'�',�R"`.ia3�:5...,yFr."'e, - - - Attachment 4 WRITTEN STATEMENT FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Dear Sir/Madam: I, Bill Everhart, along with my business partner Nick Prattfeel the need to our expand ' p business in an effort to better serve the community of Maplewood. Since opening our first Carbones at County Road C and White Bear Avenue, there have been a significant number of 1 g people that have been unable to order our style of pizza. The approval of this location will PP allow us to serve all of Maplewood, and would also raise the qualityof service to our.existing customers g . During the two years we've owned and operated our resent store our Health D . P Department Inspection scores have never been below 93. Having a work background in Industrial H . g Hygiene, has developed within me an awareness and respect for Government set codes and regulations. egulations. The day to day business operations of the present store have never generated an problems . g y p b ems in the violation of city ordinances and haven't caused any hazards dangers or nuisances in any way. We intend to operate this new location within the same stringent guidelines as our present .. g g p t store, therefore we anticipate no problems of any sort. In an effort to improve the overall appearance of the building the following additions have been made to the lease agreement with �e Rammer (buildingowner . The extension of '. ) the vinyl siding to cover the entire front of the building, repair of tholes in arkin area P I� p g ea and new window moldings on our main window. These renovations will not only be an asset . y t to our business, but will dramatically rase the value and appearance of the building g and area as a whole. If approved, the Stillwater Road location would be staffed by two full time people on weekdays and on weekends an additional support staff of four. There is sufficient off road parking. for employees available in the rear of the building as well as ample parking in the front for customers. The store will be designed as a take out/delivery facility. The operating hours will not conflict with those of our fellow tenants since our business will be open evenings and weekends allowing plenty of customer parking at all times. In closing we wish to express, it is our goal to work with allarties concerned to bring g about the approval of this site. We are always open to an suggestions or comments you . Y gg y might have that may improve on our plans for this new Maplewood business. Thank you, William T. Everhart Vice President Maplewood E & P Enterprises, Inc. 1i .. � � . -.ti::: •..;,�'u,��T, r ,ti•w.,'= �... .�'^ c�c,.g.u:�cyyyq.�;�p.�,�� Attachment 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mr. Bill Everhart applied for a conditional use permit to operate a take- out/delivery restaurant in a BC(M) (business commercial modified) zoning district. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2627-2633 Stillwater Road. The legal description is: All of Lot 27, Block 5, and that part of Lot 26, Block 5, Midvale Acres No.2 which lies southeasterlyand southwesterly of the following described line: Beginning on the East line of Ferndale Street, 114 feet south from northwesterly line of Lot 26; thence northeasterly parallel to Said Lot line 59.06 feet; thence southeasterly to a point on southeasterly line of said lot and 53.67 feet southwesterly from- east corner of Lot 26. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. on July 6, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that• the City Council this permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on .1993. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council considered reports and recommendations from 'the City staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED- that the City Council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciateroPe�y values. P 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials ' • tY� P � ,equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous detrimental, ' • g � ntal, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise lace smoke dust odor,drainage.,' glare., , fumes, water or air pollution, water run-off, vibration, , general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances, 12 . _ _ _ . , .. _.... � ,.., x � �!.t�..;4;:•+,.� . ter.. a. tf��,� .i rr�.�£= ,,r¢hti ,� �4 5. The use would generate only al vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewersy stems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive. additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. The permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. By October 31, 1993, the applicant or property owner shall: a. Install concrete curbing from the curb on Ferndale Street around the building's sign and then back to the front of the building. b. Landscape the new island with low plantings. Before planting, the City staff must approve a plan showing this landscaping. All construction shall follow the site plan City staff prepared on June 23, 1993. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The vacant space must be used for atake-out/delivery restaurant within one year after the City Council approves this permit or the permit shall end. The Council may grant up to one one-year extension of the permit. 3. Sweep and stripe the front parking lot to meet current City Code standards. 4. Install vinyl sidingon all of 2633 Stillwater Road. The siding shall match 2627 Stillwater Road. 5. Add new window moldings on the main window. 6. By October 31, 1993, provide a 100% opaque enclosure around all trash and recycling containers. The design shall meet current City standards. 7. There shall be no cooking odors that are noticeable to adjacent residences. (Code requirement) 13 8. All employees shall park on the rear (north) parking lot. 9. The City Council shall. review this permit in one year. Adopted 14 1993. Planning Commission -Z- Minutes of 7-6-93 Commissioner Rossbachggested that precautions be taken during construction, since the trash enclosure, proposed next to the wetlai}d. Commissioner Fischer moved e Planning Co on recommend adoption of the resolution which approves a c ditional use p 't for an addition to 586 Carlton Street. The permit allows thea 'tion to en oath -into the required fifty -foot setback. We are recommending this perms based o the findings required by code. The permit would be subject to the followmg ondi 'ons: 1. All construction shall follow th ite plan that the City stamped May 25, 1993, The Director of Community eve l ment may approve minor changes and shall ensure that the constructi not en oath into the wetland. 2. The proposed constru on must be bstantially started within one year after the Council approves 'permit or the pe it shall end. The Council may grant up to one one-year erasion of the p 3. The City Commissioner The motioff passed. shall not review this seconded it unless a problem develops. B. Conditional Use Permit: 2633 Stillwater Rd. (Carbones Pizzeria) Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff. report. Bill Everhart was present representing Carbones Pizzeria. Mr. Everhart explained that the parking spaces in the rear of the building would be used for employees to allow the spaces in front of the building to be used by customers. There were no comments from the public. Mike Rammer, of Osceola, Wisconsin, said he is the owner of the building. Mr. Rammer asked staff to further explain any requirements for construction of the dumpster enclosure. Mr. Rammer discussed with the director of public works what kind of installation the City allows regarding the concrete curb. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a take out/delivery restaurant at 2627-2633 Stillwater Road. We are recommending this permit based- on the findings required by the City code. The permit would be subject to the following conditions: 1. By the end of October 1993, the applicant or property owner shall: a. Install concrete curbing from the curb on Ferndale Street around the buildings sign and then back to the front of the building. Planning Commission Minutes of 7-6-93 b. Landscape the new island with low plantings. Beforeplanting, the City staff must approve a plan showing this landscaping. All construction shall follow the site plan City staff prepared on June 23, 1993. The Director of Community Development may approve or changes. 2. The vacant space must be used for a take out delivery restaurant within one year after the City Council approves this permit or thepernut shall end. The Council may grant up to one one-year extension of the permit. 3. Sweep and stripe the front parking lot to meet current City code standards. 4. Install vinyl siding on all of 2633 Stillwater Road. The siding shall match 2627 Stillwater Road, 5. Add new window moldings on the main window. 6. By the end of October 1993, provide a 100% opaque enclosure around all trash and recycling containers. The design shall meet current City standards. 7. There shall be no cooking odors that are noticeable to adjacent residences. (Code requirement) 8. .All employees shall park on the rear (north) parking lot. 9. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes --all The motion passed. C. Sterling Street (Korfs): Construction Agre ent and Increased Setback Ken Roberts, Ass ciate Planner, presen d the staff report. Rodney and Susan Korf were present. The orfs discussed th proposed driveway grade with the director of public works. There were no co nts, from the public. Commissioner Martin ovedPlanning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the res ' n which allows the construction of one house on a lot that does .not fronto aved street, because: 1. This situatio unusu 2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The Maplewood City Council invites you to a public hearing. This hearing is about a request for a conditional use permit for a restaurant. The applicant is Carbones Pizzeria. The location is 2633 Stillwater Road. The Council will hold this hearing on Monday, July 26, 1993. at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers (1830 East County Road B). Call Geoff Olson at 774-4562 for more information. Sign language interpreters are available. You must request this service at least 96 hours in advance. Call 774-4524 to make arrangements. PUBLISH: July 14, 1993 ONO Action by toUn, O. -j,1 Modif i eco MEMORANDUM Rejected...... ee � ted To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Date From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio Subj: Hiring A Park Maintenance I Person Date: July 15, 1993 Introduction The City Council has requested that the position of Park Main- tenance Person I be returned to the City Council for further discussion. This position was approved in the 1993 City Budget and it is now requested that we proceed to fill the position. Background Please see the attached information. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council approve the hiring of a new Park Maintenance Person I and direct staff to proceed with the hiring procedure. c: City Clerk ��dorse iOR.A IM Rodi fi e Rej ecce To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Da to From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio 1 Subj : Miring of Park Naintenance I Person Date: June 3, 3993 Introduction The 19,93 budget includes the hiringof a new Park Maintenance person for : . Hance � p r the . Park Maintenance Division. It is requested that the Cit Council approve � • y pp a the hiring of a person to fill this position and direct city staff toroceed with the.'taking applications, P g of a . PP , interviews and hiring. J.ack olInd Please find attached a remorandum to Michael A. McGuire Manager, , City g , dated June 3 , 199 3 , with information regarding the ntenance Person 3 need for a Park Mai g g . Recommendation It is requested that the city Council approve the hiring ring a new Park Maintenance person and direct staff to proceed with the hiring procedure. c: city Clerk. MEMORAS.QUM To: Michael A. McGuire ' McGuire, City IKanager. From: Robert D• Odegard, Director of Parks & Rec • s�j : Infor�aation Regardingreatzon Additional Park Maintenanceerson In 1993 .Budget Date: - June 3. 1993 A full-time Park Maintenance Person tremendous I is requested due to the us additional expansion of ourark nainte sibilities. Our last P Hance respon- t full-time Park Maintenance Person I was. added in 2986* Over the last two ea . Park(15 acres years, we have added- ), Geranium Park 9 acres Ha including� )� Hazelwood Park (5. acres three additional soccer fields acres Nary ), Playcrest Park (15 Harvest Park X25 acres), Hillside Par s acres of vista k (11 acres), and Hills Park. This spring Pleasantvsew completed construction with • Park an additional 14 acres. We have added additional skating rinks at Gladstone, � � tone, Geranium, Playcrest, Goodrich and Crestview Parks. Outdoor recreationd time to grow _ with the c emends con- ity accepting additional responsibilities for toe intenance of fields* We find .ourselves having g to maintain school.facilities due to their cutbacks in maintenance of their outdoor facilities* Our buildings and -equipment thus re ire additional are aging, and maintenance and upkeep* ke • D saner, we are maintai P _ P During the Hing over 50 athletic fields for baseball softball, and 6 soccer fields • W' I _ With the additional length of service by our employees, they are developing vacation and thus P g longer periods of these times must be covered b personnel. Y additional Acres of park land owned/leased.. • . •,.........•...._.338 Acres Estimate of ponds, wet areas hillsides, wood lots - not maintained for turf •.• .•..•.........b.0 t..p.r.o.t.e. .ct. ed by maintenance such astree trimming' spraying, plantin s, . ... 122 ,Acres Parking Dots . • ..... • ............ • . Tennis Courts......••...••..,••• ..•....•..•.=.•.•••5.6 Acres Basketball Courts....... .... • . ' , • ' ...... � .. • � � � . 3 Acres •••�•••••••••••••••••••�••••• Trails ...... • .... , ....... • ...... ,.. • . • 1.0 Acres TOTAL ....�.••...,....••..p. .75 Acres ••••••••••••••••.0.0••••0•0000000••••••••••••••l40.65 ACRE8 Acres of turf maintained,... ....... ••••a••••s•••o••19%,35 Acres A major consideration in turf maintenance, as well as overall maintenance of our park System, is the travel time between parksdue to the shape of the city. The above does not include the l5• baseball diamonds that we maintain for and softball that belong to both school districts. The typical talents required to be a Park Maintenance Person _- reflects the types of maintenance that they do. TURF MAINTENANCE an Now, seed, aerate, fertilize, sod, stake water FIELD MAINTENANCE- Drag infields, line baselines, paint outfield lines and soccer field lines ICE MAINTENANCE - Build berms to hold water, dumpwater put u , P P hockey prinks, repair permanent hockey rinks, replace lights, plow snow, sweep CARPENTERS Contruction, repair, install doors, locks. windows, walls ROOFERS - Replace asphalt roofs on buildings, s repair P shelters PAINTERS - In and outside of buildings, play'e i �- P went, rinks, lining ELEICIANS - Lights PLIERS - Irrigation systems toilets sinks SHEET METAL - Heatingin buildings beaters buildingsl tars MASONRY - Frame up, pour, -f finish (shelter f boors picnic , and - bench slabs) INSTALL PLAY EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND CLEAN TRAILS CLEAN AND MAINTAIN TENNIS COURTS - Fill cracks ' heck lights, set timers TREES & SHRUBS - Plant, water, trim new trees, nulch winter tring PARK MAINTENANCE STORK: Install and Repair Fences - Backsto s baselines ' P . ,protection fences . Safety Inspections - Play equipment, tennis courts buildings Construct New Facilities -- Infields, play areas, skating rinks, hockey rinks, trails - Put together picnic tables, bleachers, grills, benches, identification signs ** SANITATION ENGINEERS - Clean u of . p ter people - Collect and dump garbage - Sweep up broken glass, etc. Take out and bring in players benches, hockeygoals, soccer goals, . g , car Prepare and clean up gardens (147 plots at Heritage Center), • TYPICAL EQUIPMErTT OPERATED BY PARK MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL Trucks Variety (A license recruited) - Trailers attached Mowers - 20" Rotary Push to 161 Flail on Tractor Tractors - P.T.D. Front End Loaders Tank Trucks Road Patrol- Snowplows Snow Sweepers Rock Picker Aerator/Slicer Slit Seeder Fertilizer Spreaders Sprayers Rototill ers scrapers/Levelers Trucksters Tree Spade Vibra Pack Chain Saws Tree Loppers Backhoe TYPICAL SHOP EQUIPMENT USED BY PARK MAINTENANCE: Cut -A -Letter Band Saw Circular Saw Drill Press Sanders Impact Tools Grinder Clamps • ' r ♦ ••;: i !My •w. M. A • UI/ti .y!1tyrT•i� Agl*W :t��'1 �!« t,}Irryflfl ` I'1t/,.rf1•fS• . T F f.' "i••.. •1 •iii••. ''f1,`+�'• , ��•• � / ♦ .,�1�,t1•�• /f.' �'. rA �,� y ! 1 �•. • • ." •fl' • �.• � • 1•••••'.;�1.-.1V .Nf 1'N',..•'r•' .•�,it•r��.�•'��1�•.\:L��.••',••.f �'.�•i�f� ;�'.�n►' {i•�.%�'�.. 'L f W����1�. 1.i•. .I. .. i'� y 1 •• r ,•• wr...r. r• ... •• V 4 • f 44 Qr v 4 QC ;�• p� wh c; q� oQ o , ,4 ac o; w ,h !;r�h PARK v �•, qo � _ �•., v h � � o � v� �•u,�� �ti��h' J �•,,J� w,J �•�.a w O ah�v .w ��vw �w• �O Atizcj • t� 0 • on e 1 his l RAr� �0 4 1 1 a 1 A l rests i ew C 80 filerton .U. C 90 2 1 2 1 70 • Fish Creek N. P. 9 L RAM' 0 . F1 i cek S. U. 3 AM 40 I { 40 four -Seasons —Nape 80 1 1 2L l B 1 1 0 1 Geranium N.P. 8.8 80 1 1 1 2 •2 Gethsemane N•. 70 2 1 1 1 B 1 2 0 • ads tone N. 0 Gloster N.P. 0 2 A 600dr i ch N.P. /S. U. 24 AM 70 1 2L 2 B 1 3 1 l0U Harvest Pf ��' 1 1 �oc3 r 5 mammon F._� � ..__._ � 20 1 2 U now Heritage Center .U. C 70 �...� N i.l..l.side ' Kenwood M. Pak .5 Kohiman N.P. 1 2 9 -L1 !D .22 lions N.P. 3 A' 1 • 1 C aol wow lookout U.S. .2C Miami ---0 -- owmalef Mai and M.P..","To 5 70 _ 3 Map ecrest N.Po 2 B 1 :Na ewoo Hey hts N. —25 2L 2 B 1 Nature Center S.U0 C 80 1226 1.2 4 Nebraska 14.P. 2 C A •4 a North Hazelwood N.P. /CPF 50 C ' 1 '' peasantview crest N.P. 1 1 2• .q ,C 1s .5 N. a 1 A 11 1 2.0 2 obinhood N. . 1 A 1 0~ 2 ose awn Pond Sherwood N. U 12 s Timber N. P, 5 80B V sta Hills N. 4 _ Wakefield---- N. CP 1 1 C 1 1 100 ..Western Hills _N. 1 2 C 1 l � 1 6 '' . 2'/3L 3 � � 6 8 ief d: 5 4 5 16 33 -a 7 h � •y . TOTALS 33 SITES Mat 1L N.P. • !fie i ghborhood Park � 3 �.0 S. - Open SpaceLighted L • A Good CPF - Community Play Field R - Average S.U. - Special Use. C - Minimal M.P. - Mini -Park ' C • City Leased RAM Ramsgy County • - • • ••• . . ♦ '• • 00 . • • •`••#00 r•r-104, . w . • • • Iw . • t • /,�..'f •.•• •f i • j. oli.0.9N �•yn.......f»J ::*'�..�•40, i f t BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W. QUARNSTROM July 13, 1993 Mr. Michael McGuire City Manager Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109-2797 Re: Motor Vehicle Repair ordinance Dear Mr. McGuire: .A.ctlon by Council: Endorsea.��.,. M o d i -i.. i e d wu,msis-o.�u�t Rejected.��. Date FAX (612) 223-8019 Please be advised that I have reviewed the abandoned motor vehicle ordinance §19-28 with both the Chief of Police and the City Clerk. By way of historical development, this ordinance was substantially amended in 1990. As part of our review, we coordinated and reviewed the various ordinances from the cities of Minnetonka, Burnsville, Edina and other first tier cities. Our analysis indicated that our ordinance was similar or better than the other municipalities. The key to our ordinance focusses on enforcement. Specifically §19-21 states: states: "Any person who abandons a motor vehicle in the City on any public or private property without the consent of the person in control of such property is guilty of a misdemeanor." Pursuant to S 19-31, certain vehicles may declared as a nuisance, specifically the ordinance "Any vehicle, wherever found in the City, in violation of this article, the ordinances of the City or the laws of the state is hereby declared to be a nuisance, and the same may be summarily abated by or under the direction or at the request of police officer by removing and impounding such vehicle in a public pound by means of towing, or otherwise, and shall be only surrendered to the duly identified owner thereof or its agents thereof on the payment of fees hereinafter provided in this article." z Mr. Michael McGuire Page Two July 13, 1993 Also § 19-32 allows the City to exercise immediate sale of certain abandoned motor vehicles specifically it states: "When an abandoned motor vehicle in the City is more than seven (7) model years of age, it is lacking vital component parts and does not display a license plate currently valid in Minnesota or in any other state or foreign country, it shall immediately be for sale at a public auction pursuant to §19-38 of this article and shall not be subject to notification, reclamation or title provisions of this article." Finally S 19-33 allows prosecution even in the event of impounding, specifically it states: "The impounding a vehicle pursuant to this article shall not prevent or preclude the institution and prosecution and proceedings for violation of any provision of this code, ordinance of the City or state law, the municipal court or elsewhere against the owner or operator of such impounded vehicle." The key to our junk car ordinance is whether or not the City chooses to initiate enforcement. It has been suggested that in order to test the ordinance, the City designate a week of blanket enforcement for junk cars or abandoned vehicles and designates said week as a priority. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, W GAN & KELLY, P.A. PJK:kj 11 Y. r e 4 TOO MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Assoa'ate Planner SUBJECT: Construction Agreement and Increased Fmnt Setback LOCATION: Sterling Street, south of Carver Avenue DATE: June 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION Action by, Council 9 is Endorse Modif i ed.,„ . Rei eeted...._ lo�+avr n Date — Rodney and Susan Korf are requesting that the City Council allow them to build a house on a lot that does not front on a street. The lot is a 7.5 -acre parcel behind 1490 and 1494 South Sterling Street. (See the maps on pages 6-7.) The Korfs own the property. To build the house, the City must approve: 1. A special agreement to build a house on a lot that does not front on a street. 2. A setback of more than 35 feet. The Korfs need a special agreement because their lot does not front on a street. Section 9-1 of the City Code states that, "No building permits will be issued for any construction within the City, unless the building site is located adjacent to an existing street which is dedicated and maintained as a City street...except that, in isolated incidences, the council may enter into an agreement with the property owner for special handling of an unusual situation..." There is a 12 -foot -wide access easement between Sterling Street and the Korfs property. There is a 12 -foot -wide paved drive from Sterling Street to the garage on 1490 Sterling Street. The Korfs plan to extend .this drive to their proposed house. (See the Korfs letter and drawings on pages 8-11.) The Korfs also need approval for an increased front setback. Their proposed house would be about 418 feet from their front property line and about 745 feet from the Sterling Street right-of-way. The City Code limits the front yard setback to 35 feet. The City may allow a greater setback if the proposal meets certain conditions. (See the conditions on page 5.) BACKGROUND The Korfs state that in their letter on page 8 that their real estate agent called the planning office over a year ago about recording a purchase agreement. One of the associate planners recalls someone asking some general questions about developing the property, but the planner does not recall what was discussed. DISCUSSION Construction Agreement Our main concern is the proposed driveway grade. The house would be 130 feet above the properties on Sterling Street. The driveway would rise the 130 feet in about 700 linear feet. This is an average grade of 18.6%. The City Engineer prefers driveways to have a maximum grade of 10%. The driveway for. the house at 1460 Sterling Street South has an 18% grade. A steep driveway could be difficult, if not impossible, for emergency vehicles to use especially if the driveway has ice or snow on it. An unstable surface (with washouts or ruts also could make the driveway im impassibleThe fire code re uires the house to P q have a 12 -foot -Wide ,-weather driving surface within 150 feet of thero osed house. An P p all-weather surface could be compacted gravel, blacktop or concrete. The Korfs should agree to: 1. Maintain, plow and sand this driveway to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Safety. 2. Hold the City harn�less, in case an emergency vehicle cannot get to the house because of the condition or steepness of the driveway. Drainage and Erosion Control Mr. Deal (1490 South Sterling Street) is concerned about drainage. The City Engineer feels that there will be no significant increase in drainage to Mr. Deal's property. Because of the steep slopes, erosion control is a concern. The Korfs should provide a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the driveway and house for. the City Engineer to approve. Front Yard Setback The Korfs cannot meet the maximum front setback requirement because their lot does not front on the street. The increased setback on their lot is to put the house on top of an existing hill. This proposed setback would meet the Cites standards for a larger front yard setback. This is because the proposed house site would not affect the drainage or privacy of adjacent homes. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 12. This resolution allows the construction of one house on a lot that does not front on a paved street, because: 2 I. This situation is unusual. 2. The property owner &*d not cause the existing conditions. 3. The drive and one house would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. The City has approved other homes on private drives. This resolutionrequires that the property owners do the following before the City issues a binding permit: 1. Record an agreement against the property that: a. Requires that the property owner maintain, plow and sand the driveway to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Safety. b. Holds the City harmless if an emergency vehicle cannot get to the house because of the condition or steepness of the driveway. The City Attorney shall draft this agreement. 2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the proposed house and driveway. The driveway must be an all-weather surface, at least twelve feet wide, to meet the Fire Code. The house location must meet the requirements of the City's environmental protection ordinance for steep slopes. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City Engineerand the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must be according to this plan.. 3. Install a sign at Sterling Street and the driveway that states the address of the house and that the drive is private. B. Approve a front setback of 745 feet for this site. The owners may move the house further back if needed to meet the City's slope ordinance. 3 CITIZEN COMMENTS The City sent surveys to four of the nearby propertyowners. We received three replies. Two. were against and one had no comment. 1. Who repairs my driveway if damaged and what type of drive and also drainage, etc. My property is low and any change in flow of run off water could flood me. I think a more complete plan is needed. (Melvin Deal - 1490 South Sterling) 2. We are concerned that in the future the present owner may decide to split the lot and more homes may be built. This would take away from the privacy and seclusion of our lot. We will be trading some land with our neighbor in the future then our lot line will back Rodney's. They may want to have the water tested if they have not already. (Kruse - 1494 Sterling Street) REFERENCE SURVEY of OTHER CITIES In 1992, the City staff surveyed twenty suburban cities to see if they allow homes that front only on private driveways. Only four allow such lots. These four cities require City Council approval for such a request. HISTORY Other Similar Requests (buildings not on an improved public street) April 20, 197: The City Council approved a request for Lorne Heinzen to construct a house at 2554 Idaho Avenue. Ms. He en's lot did not front on a paved street. The Council approved the request, subject to the owner paving a driveway to the existing street. _ May 18, 1978: The City Council approved a request of James Sobota to construct a storage building east of 2054 English Street. This building is on property that does not front on a paved street. This approval was subject to two conditions the City Engineer approving the driveway design and the applicant recording a maintenance agreement for the driveway. May 1, 1980: The City Council approved a request from Keith Libby to build three homes on aland-locked parcel. The site is on Century Avenue, south of I-494. The only access to this pard is a 30 -foot driveway easement from Century Avenue. This approval was subject to Mr. Libby installing a paved driveway on the existing easement 4 to the City Engineer's specifications. The City also required the applicant to sign an agreement to maintain the drive to City standards, including snow plowing. July 13, 1992: The City Council approved three requests for Radmila Popov for the Piletich property at 860 Burke Court. Burke Court is a private driveway. These requests allowed Ms. Popov to divide the property at 860 Burke Court into three lots. This approval also allows a total of five lots that do not front on an improved public street. November 23, 1992: The City Council approved a construction agreement and street vacations for Marlow Priebe. This agreement. allowed the property owner to build two houses on a private driveway. This property is south of the Eldridge Avenue right-of- way and west of Birmingham Street. These two houses are on lots that do not front on an unproved public street. FRONT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Section 36-70(b) of City Code allows the City to approve a larger front yard setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1. The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2. The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in Section 9-188 (environmental protection ordinance). 3. The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state or federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations. 4. The proposed setback is necessary for energy-saving, health or safety reasons. UTILITIES There are no public utilities available to this site. go/b-4:Korfinem (24-28) Attachments: 1, Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Letter and attachments form the Korfs 4. Resolution 5 • r7t.,liltTCi1�, 1 a • ti • • ' ••• iii � ••� 17 � . • o• i• . Tau aim L LER DR.Tit ER 6A , PHYLIS �:T.ArAVOE�. /y �rI� %w ii• 1 • CURRIE V • • • •• • • - 2. Vu1FY VtEwCT. Vt VALLEY Vf ErK AVS. . �, e.• -_-,s• L�UCEI�OQO CT• • i 7 • 2 48 NI AVE. or 9605 AVE, � o z o V, NEMriZ AVE — o o _�•- O �E r 18 •~mmmom O or go 6 m.—. 0 Ir MOREL ND � AV* �`• .�.• Or. .• •, CT. •• � V � , C'Qt'Wr • � a � �„n a� Lvk. ZOOS BOXWOOD AV. Pwk a -Z OG . o • M .,so CARVER • $. AVE. @ too 19 OVERLOOK � �3 •:. •. • :• Calk a ', 00600 440S r • . •t'�► % • ob • :. • �._. •� • w 1 be 20 00 •e • • • 'A be .' • *A �. ••• •ti•• % • 00 • •SEY COU •.• • ote"o ftm *so obe 00,0 1680•be-b` • • • • • • o lb WASHIND* TON COUNTY LOCATION MAP d Aw {t ?, 1400 (5) 10 •' - 1420 - 165 N= ,? ,1440vw�ad -570 8 • 4 - , -- low Im. qw 14 4wo vow. 6.7 jZ- 4 88 1450 1460. , L do tog, . 1480 c-� a4 �f -EAST � � a� ING EASEMENT 10 o 1494 :.,.� 7.50 , - SITE 1494 1 t o � 1530 /19. ZJac . O ` A) IB PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP N W oc Z J � Q -1 s t i i i ir 7Motar t / Jf PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP N Attachment 3 June 2. 1993 Mr. Jeff Olson Maplewood City Planner Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: We are recent owners of the property listed as 14XX Sterling St. (P.ID#'242822420004-6) in South Maplewood. Over a year ago when the purchase was initiated -our real estate agent, Dave Tommeraasen of Burnet Realty inquired of the city planning office what requirements would be needed for recording on the purchase agreement. The information given stated that; 1. The lot must allow 75' frontage on all sides 2. A driveway easement was needed in writing 3. If the lot was to be subdivided, a variance was needed (we had considered this but decided not to pursue a sub division at this time) On subsequent visits, inquiring about existing easements and revisions thereof, by Rod Korf, nothing was mentioned about additional paper- work and/or Council Approvals. We are now in the precarious position whereby our existing home is sold and we are in a "holding pattern" over this newest approval. We are between a rock and a hardpl ace in not being able to begin building our home. All our money and resources are committed to this project and every days delay costs an exhorbitant amount of money. Without any "finger pointing" we would just like to expedite the procedure to , be able to start our building project and stay on schedule for an August first complete date. If you and the -City of Maplewood are certain that we would be an asset to your taxbase and feel approval is immanent, should there really be a need to make us delay our process further? Your help in this matter i s greatly appreciated and we look forward to being a part of Maplewood. For your convenience, we have enclosed copies of the survey with easement and also the builders copy. Item labeled #1 is a total land survey, professionally done/ #2 shows the new easement, restructured to go around an..existing garage /#3 is a plat map showing the home on the property.. Sincerely, Rodney and Susan Korf 1634 Margaret Street -771_3974 St. Paul, MN 55106 -17Z. 1E f % �t✓ �G/ $usarF Enclosures 8 A L .:let: l35,_293 d i i s elm SCALE: 1 Inch .= 100 Feet o Denotes set Iron pipe, Ce h /e ° I' `S'eC . 2¢ , 7-wP, 28, AP • 2Z + Denotes found monument, Bearings are on an assured datum. LQ � o 0 o I I v'rv,,• o,,CC' O /in e o e N%2 o f' A N�4' o 1' ,rVWA o�'.S'�• Y4 •��o'y a 2 0 "b a f d fZ j�•' +� 104C0 ° .S �. � 1 X33 .// - -..1 4.. e g . -A Aloe A l n e o f'' �� c S/ o,r' A e NYz o ,li e v�' XC A4 off' ,Sec. P¢ Nd9 °'�6' ,�. 0 4- - 140.00 - -- ' . C N s •o ` . r _ _ i• Tin shed , V � _� • , ..... � ,r ...... ��. •'•�f.•!•- -: .r.r - r .. E^ C` / I 'VN ,', • .. ..,�% V�' •.. .... iOa. S.� .... 'i'•�s� �D'.. •..• .... -i.Wo rdw N89 °!6" s! "E ti 1A0 ' qtvCoro e � � � } p� � 9 0 �� 3 r i \� •�� SVO ' ti t G Area of described property = 32 t �� N .�,, � _ ► �. v c., ; Y ,972 Sq. Ft. (7.391 _ Acres) Q 1 � o t 1 • moi, S, • .. 326.93 • t 1 • t a9 •�9 be •♦E � --- MO. 79--- X04W llo7e v/1 S'/ o�' 14e N/ o/NW)V of Ae .rSP o Vee. ?4, TwP ZB./ iPy�. 12 DESCRIPTION AS FURNISHED BY CLIENT The South "nj f n thm rgrr 7•hrr+n_C'�,►�....•,.... r r � t... rr , � .. • For: GERALD WALTER 2236 Falcon Ave. St. Paul, Mn. 55119 JuN 21993 Tel: 735-2986 r.• A perpetual easement 12 feet in width for F-- ingress & egress over, under and 'across the West Quarter of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of :he Southeast Qua: ter r.f Section 24, Township 28•, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement being described as beginning at a point on the west line of said Southeast Quarter distant 352.68 feet south from the northwest corner thereof; �= said west line is assumed to bear South 0 s_ degrees 39 minutes 58 seconds East; thence 4 North 89 degrees 19 minutes 08 seconds East 155.30 feet; thence South 85 degrees 26 minutes 01 seconds East 172.47 feet to the _ east line of said West Quarter of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 and f there terminating. :fir •• : . • o/ gee. 2¢, 7: 28, R.2Z s so a-19s's'r .....IC 2/. Ic .«.. 1 •i\'� jFLrF •� It ' � G y' � C R �• t ' t, o the Alyn of TheNWY4 A SCV# o f See. Z4 y h ( I � I _ • 11 O � X4+6 - Cora _q i 1. '` f� ��:�r ��> •<:. l -. h, 1LOCW i�+R < . tt ' r, :; •'fir. 1. � -.�; V1 t ��' 'i!iti;,. �; ja �`! .ti'�;aw � ;j.•;,y�C•e ::.�. •.� r ,i•y„tirr;...• ,1� O.' . '��' #:•;s4Q1►ty � � lZ � x �,<.�.•y,�z.°' �1••r�..:.:�..� t�°y � t `;�v, S c,• ;�.SL:L•i�*'v�.:r`:x � • 1 .• y ��`�',M;r; .f.,� Via) ( ♦:tai!; 7v , "C �i'1``.w.'F••)y,�(••••o• .Y ^'S: i. •.a •.+.t •? ,..';y7 f`f �, X..,<<'.♦t •:•�..vv~f•. ..._ at ': ♦I<�:'�Vgry.y ,. •J . .;.F :', .,>. �:. )• S•j,•.•vf- iyQ'C X1..'2 '� Meley ��tt�. j..♦f v, 1k; .,t `'n,:. i��:;' �''?'r.Yyi �j '�rr�.r.� ..: .Y � T:.Z�S ( _. ])he OF ibe- SE %4 Scale: 1'�= 30' I hereby Cerli���y' fh►1 INS flan,survey or reporf ni4s prYparea/ E. Q(j,p C 5D/VS INC, Ve4iskrid me or undir r direei super vision and fhaf .1 am a . du18eOk Land sur VB or Under fhe laws of �C .S'fa�G O `y LAND SURVE yORS Aade ne DafQ ' •y r� j 9/cfoLexrn ton Ave. N. . NI so a a ,f�h�s ..�� day off' Circle An Mn. 55014 - • n 10 PROPOSED HOUSE W � . a r ' �o r 44 v I v s r `490 } ; 1494 M 1 1 Page 11--s,.= SF j PROPOSED SITE PLAN . � .. - - •• • •' ."•.�iL.ww�•..�a+sf�p�w•yp nfl�Malo�lC�r+nyvfD�R�YIi�fDIMMCY.•X Attachment 4 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Rodney and Susan Korf are asking that the City approve an agreement to build a house on a lot that does not front on a street. WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: The South Half of the East Three -Quarters of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota; except the North 35 feet of the West 140 feet thereof; also the East 140 feet of the South 35 feet of the North Half of the East Three -Quarters of the North half of the NorthwestQuarterof the Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 28, Range 22. Together with; A perpetual easement 12 feet in width for ingress and egress over, under and across the West Quarter of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement being described as beginning at a point on the West line of said Southeast Quarter distant 352.68 feet South from the Northwest comer thereof; said West line is assumed to bear South 0 degrees 39 minutes 58 seconds East; thence North 89 degrees 19 minutes 08 seconds East 155.30 feet; thence South 85 degrees 26 minutes Ol seconds East 172.47 feet to the East line of said West Quarter of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 and there terminating, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, Section 9-1 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires lots to front on a publicly dedicated and maintained street. WHEREAS, the above-described dwelling would not front apublicly-maintained street. WHEREAS, the history of this request is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed. this request on July 6, 1993. They recommended that the City Council the request. 12 2. The City Council discussed this request on , 1993. The Council gave everyone at the meeting a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Coinndss on. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council .allow the construction of a house on the above-described lot because: 1. This situation is unusual. 2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions. 3. The drive and one home would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. The City has approved other homes on private drives. The property owners shall do the following before the City issues a building permit: 1. Record an agreement against the property that: a. Requires that the property owner maintain, plow and sand the driveway to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Safety. b. Holds the City harmless if an emergency vehicle cannot get to the house because of the condition or steepness of the driveway. The City Attorney shall draft this agreement. 2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the proposed house and driveway. The driveway must be an all-weather surface, at least twelve feet wide, to meet the Fire Code. The house location must meet the requirements of the City's environmental protection ordinance for steep slopes. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must be according to this plan. 3. Install a sign at Sterling Street and the driveway that states the address of the house and that the drive is private. Adopted on _21993. 13 Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 7-6-93 b. Landscape the new island with low plantings. Before planting, the City staff must app r ve a plan showing this landscaping. Al construction all follow the site plan City staff prepared on June 23, .1993. The Director of C unity Development may approve minor changes. 2. The vacant space m be used for a take out/ 'very restaurant within one year after the City Council pproves this permit o e permit shall end. The Council may grant up to one a year extension of e permit. 3. Sweep and stripe the fron parking to o meet current City code standards. 4, install vinyl siding on all of 633 tillwater Road. The siding shall match 2627 5tMwater Road. S. Add new window moldings n e main window. 6. By the end of October 1 3, pro e a 100% opaque enclosure around all trash and recycling containe The desi shall meet current City standards. 7. There shall be no o. odors that e noticeable to adjacent residences. (Code requirement) 8. All employees all park on the rear (no )parking lot. 9. The City C cil shall review this permit in one year. Commission Pearson seconded Ayes--all 'The motin passed. C. Sterling Street (Korfs): Construction agreement and Increased Setback Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Rodney and Susan Korf were present. The Korfs discussed the proposed driveway grade with the director of public works. There were no comments from the public. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which allows the construction of one house on a lot that does not front on a paved street, because: 1. This situation is unusual. 2. The property owner did not cause the existing conditions. Planning Commission Minutes of 7-6-93 M 3. The drive and one house would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. The City has approved other homes on private drives. This resolution requires that the property owners do the following before the City issues a building permit: 1. Record an agreement against the properly that: a. Requires that the property owner maintain, plow and sand the driveway to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Safety. b. Holds the City harmless if an emergency vehicle cannot get to the house because, of the condition or steepness of the driveway. The City Attorney shall draft this agreement. 2. Give the City Engineer a grading, drainage and erosion control plan for the proposed house and driveway. The driveway must be an all-weather surface, at least twelve feet wide, to meet the Fire Code. The house location must meet the requirements of the City's environmental protection ordinance for steep slopes. The City shall not issue a building permit unless the City Engineer and the Fire Marshal approve this plan. All construction must be according to this plan. 3. Install a sign at Sterling Street and the driveway that states the address. of the house and that the drive is private. B. Approval of a front setback of 745 feet for this site. The owners may move the house further back if needed to meet the Cites slope ordinance. Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes --all The motion passed. D. Commercial Property Study Secretary Olson presented e staff ort. The Commission discussed this study and the list of discussion items t Kely mitt�d to the City Council. The Commission added a sentence to Numberfollows. "Should there be special added considerations when site ' abuts residential areas, particularly where there are significant elevation erences." MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Birch Run Station Sign Plan APPLICANT: welsh Companies, Inc. DATE: July 8, 1993 iNrRooucnoN Request F�7 "4- . Action by Cotlnoll ®] `ti Endorsed Modified Rejected... Date Robert Pounds, of welsh Companies, Inc., is asking that the City Council change the Birch Run Station sign plan. Mr. Pounds is asking that the City: 1. Drop the requirement that signs not exceed 65% of the length of each tenant's store front. Mr. Pounds, instead, requests that tenants place their signs at least 18 inches from both sides of a store front. This change would ensure at least three feet between adjacent signs. 2. Allow an exception to the new criteria. This exception would allow Famous Footwear's sign to have an eight -inch margin from the store front's north side. Reason for the Request Mr. Pounds is requesting these changes because the Famous Footwear sign does not meet the current or proposed sign criteria. Famous Footwear proposed to erect their sign with an 18 -inch margin from their store front's north side. (See the drawing on page 6.) They installed their sign, however, five feet from the south side of their store front and eight inches from the north. side. They centered their sign on their gable- facade. ablefacade. The gable facade, however, is offset on the store front. (See Mr. Pound's letter on page 7.) BACKGROUND March 23, 1993: The Community Design Review Board recommended that the City Council change the sign criteria to require an 18 -inch sign margin. DISCUSSION Sign Spacing The City Councfl should change the Birch Run Station sign. plan. Most sign plans require a margin at each end of a sign, rather than limiting the overall length. The plan should require at. least an 18 -inch margin at each end of the tenants' signs. This. change would provide at least three feet of space between adjacent signs and meet the intent of the original requirement. A r dnimum 18 -inch margin is consistent with most of the shopping centers in the City. Shoup ng Centers Minimum..Reguired Side Mares Maple Ridge Center 18 inches Maplewood Auto Center 18 inches Mogren's Corner 18 inches Maplewood. Corner Shops 18 inches Maplewood Plaza 18 inches Maplewood Town Center 18 inches Maplewood Commons 12 inches Maplewood Square (E & W sides) 12 inches Maplewood Square (N & S sides) 24 inches Famous Footwear The intent of the sign plan is to provide at least three feet between signs. The Famous Footwear sign is fourteen feet from the adjacent Parties Galore sign. This is eleven feet more than intended by the sign plan. The Famous Footwear sign meets the intent of the plan. RECOMMENDATION Change Condition Four of the Birch Run Station sign criteria as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) 4. Tenants TlaniainT-shall be limited to one - sign on the front fascia of the o-- o canopy. These signs shall be neon or constructed of individual letters, mounted on a raceway. Copy height shall not exceed 42 inches. not Si= shall not be closer ._ than 18 inches to either side of the tenant's store front. This criteria allows an exception for the Famous Footwear sign to be eight inches from the right side of the store's edge. A future sign for the tenant to the north must be at least three feet from the Famous Footwear sizn. When the Famous Footwear size is removed, a new sim shall be at least ten inches from either side of the cable facade. Appeals Anyone may appeal the Board's decision. to the City Council. An appellant must notify someone in the Community Development Department within fifteen days after the Board's meeting. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION Birch Run Station Sign Plan Changes September 12, 1989: The Community Design Review Board approved the Birch Run Station sign plan. October 24, 1989: The Board allowed the five anchor stores to place signs on the end of the building that faces Southlawn Drive. October 9, 1990: The Board allowed additional sign copy on the ground signs and increased the allowed height of fascia signs from 36 to 42 inches. The taller height was to allow Crown Shoes to install a 42 -inch -tall sign. June 25, 1991: The Board revised the sign plan to allow Gung Ho Restaurant to install a sign on the end of their canopy. March 23, 1993: The Board approved a new gable for Famous Footwear and recommended that the City Council change the sign plan to require 18 -inch margins from either side of a store front. The Board's decision on the gable was not appealed, so that decision is final. The City Council did not review the original building design. The Community Design Review Board approved it without appeal. The Code requires that the City Council approve sign plan changes. go\b-4:famefot2.mem (3) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Famous Footwear sign 4. Leiter from Bob Pounds 3 ment I ....... . .... cQ RD 0 cc BIRCH RUN STATION LYDIA V�o .. ... ...... got, ui .......... 19 ST 3: �/o Ar 19 Vo ........ . yc ........... & UJ .............. .... . . 19 11ADATZ ul AfA loop cr POND .. ,.-• 1 qLMANU AV V) W KOHMAN AV in 31 z W cr co > RD 203 c r tvn) cn z T29NIR22W La U) :t J 3 i2 1,� �• N cr cn E Or E HILL RD 101 11 u lk Z I j Li LL 1013 AV lx DEmoiW AV cl) �' ` 8 R0 AV rr El F< SEXTANT Qi a't�ftAV XTAN T AV <GERVAIS GEMIAl GERVAIS AV u cr GFIANDVIEW AV CT w < m VIKING OR •S 71 E AV ;NRRJN 4y LOCATION MAP 4 !1 i Attachment 2 II so 1� I ounaT , I ounar 3 1 FAMOUS FOOTWEAR n n om I OU7laT 2 I 9.0% SF. HUM sr. 1 � :s �o rx LAJ Z W Q Z Q J H D 0 V) vl I 1-5 41M. b W tiD dik Attachment 3 CO' i5 -Zp W wi :2 Q Z Q W to= W LLJ z 0 0 z a < z U. ME 0 o C� Z o g Q .0 Ce d Z o=c I L m Uachment 4 WelshCompanies ;,I 8 1^'0- June 4, 1993 Mr. Tom Ekstrand Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Birch Run Station Shopping Center Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Tom: I apologize for the delay in responding to you regarding the incorrect manner which Famous Footwear's sign was installed at the above captioned property. We wanted to determine why the sign was incorrectly placed on the new facade treatment prior to taking any steps to remedy the situation. We have had the opportunity to speak with Famous Footwear's construction department, and to review the project in detail. The reason the sign was placed in the fashion it was, was the result of the facade not matching the lease lines (storefront) of the tenant. If you recall, the facade treatment we recently constructed for Famous Footwear was constructed to match the width of the existing support columns, as opposed to the actual storefront. However, the sign was built to allow for the full linear footage of the storefront less the 18" required setback on each side. Consequently, the left side set back is in excess of 5' and right side setback is approximately 8". You should know that the adjacent sign (Parties Galore) is in excess of 6 feet from the right side of the Famous Footwear sign, certainly more than the 36" that would ordinarily be required. As such, we request that you give consideration to Famous Footwear's sign being in variance to our current proposed guidelines which provide for an 18" setback to either side of the tenant's signage. Sincerely, WELSH COMPANIES, INC. OLOO Robert B. Pounds, CSM Senior Retail Manager 612/829-3436 7 MEMBER CF;G INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL REALTY SERVICES 11200 WEST 78TH. STREET, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55344 612 / 944-5810 FACSIMILE 612 / 944-59ou ► � ► ► "•' — 'l. .'L i �". ,., -. v^Y`t T ` � � 'r k' w - �` a, i ►r:��y � r•-�`I �f T '. � � �' k` "' .A!'�t , C+, . + _'��, < : , � ;r Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of July 14, 1993 V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Sign Plan Change - Birch Run Station Secretary Ekstrand explained the staff report for this requested sign plan change. Welsh Companies, Inc. is asking that the City change the Birch Run Station sign plan, because the Famous Footwear sign does not meet the current or proposed sign criteria. They are requesting an exception to the new criteria the Design Board recommended approval of recently. No representative was present for. Welsh Companies, Inc. The Board members agreed that the present sign placement for Famous Footwear is logical and looks attractive. Boardmember Thompson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend changing Condirion Four of the Birch Run Station sign criteria as follows: 4• Tenants oc shall be limited to one sign on the front fascia of the canopy. These signs shall be neon or constructed of individual letters, mounted on a raceway. Copy height shall not exceed 42 inches. . Suns shall not be closer than 18 inches to either side of the tenant's store front. This criteria allows an exception for the Famous Footwear size to be eight inches from the right side of the store's ' edge. A future sign for the tenant to the north must be at least three feet from the Famous Footwear sign. When the Famous Footwear sign_ removed, a new sign shall be at least ten inches , from either side of the gable facade. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes --all VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Building Addition-,Kinderberry Hill Day CarqC�enter, 586 Carlton Street Nola Kreml was prese representing erbeny Hill III. Janis Blumentals, the architect for the project, was also pre nt. Mr. Blumentals said there would not be any roof equipment on additio .Chairperson Moe asked for comments from the public, but there were co ents. The Board discussed the proposed placement of trees on the pr and the closing of the north curb cut on Carlton Street. Boardmember Thompso movede Community Design Review Board recommend approval of the plans (s amped Ma 25, 1993) for building addition to Kinderberry Hill Day Care at 586 C lton Street. e property owner shall do the following: J 3 MEMORANDUM Action by Council: Endorsed Modified Re j ecte To. Michael A. McGuire, City Manager Date From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recre-- atio Subj: Park Signs Date: July 13, 1993 Introduction The Park & Recreation Commission has been working diligently to develop a user friendly sign that would indicate park rules. It is requested that the City Council authorize the placement of these metal signs in designated parks throughout the Maplewood park system. Background Over the years there has been a conflict between park abusers, such as dog owners who do not clean up after their dogs, or vehicles that rut up turf, and people who like to see their parks well maintained. Although we have ordinances that guide us in the use of our parks they are not common knowledge. It has been difficult for those who are requested to enforce the ordinances to not have a list of the rules obvious to those who are in the parks. The Park & Recreation Commission has tried to indicate to park users that they are welcomed to use the parks, however, they are requested to abide by our rules. Attached is a copy of the proposed signage which will be on aluminum and have reflective two screened colors (yellow and maroon). The sign will be 36 inches wide by 60 inches long. The script letters on the top will be 3 inches high and the block "Park Rules" will be 2 1/2 inches high. The letters in the main part of the sign.will be 1 inch high and the symbols on the bottom will be 6 inches in diameter. The script across the bottom will be 2 inches in height and the bottom line 1 1/2 inches in height. Our attached quote from M -R Sign Company is $65.48 per sign plus tax. For forty signs the total cost is $2789.45. Treated pine posts are estimated to cost $25.00 per sign. Attached is a list of parks and the number of signs in parentheses where more than one sign would be in the park. We have reviewed funding sources and at this time we are recommending the Commercial PAC monies be used since this is a new development for each park and is not a replacement cost. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council authorize the purchase of 40 new park signs and posts with funding not to exceed $4000.00 from Commercial PAC Funds. es City Clerk .'`�C' c, r -r2F�r�. '�, % 1 4 ,, j 7 ,• •� �, � t, � � ft ; � ._„ dl` • I�! + 1 jj r f•it iY' �f ',i `. VS {, i � f;� j�� f�� �I�ri�� Fv'.t.; ..��.-fit _�C:� 1� � •f�. �1 't.4•i•'••. )our apapm fraw-M u n R 1"Wis" to 1/2' hni, ar aft IMU MY by iflAy -sch;Q1EO!!!,vAWed perm� irIft Z,e Veh"ctes may be in' pawinu t o vs aMy w he" fn&rkS L are open,. (Ord,, ueew 4-j ewy pets . must he an a leash. P(Drson in contral of dog must clean up fe-Cesm (up ta $100" Fine) (Ord. Sec. 7"jg.�; ecce 7mjl4Z 4w NoPSG and ceordinances in effect. .(Ord,. SeQ 19) &let 3 Upty ordinences enfarcecL 0 '60 Date of Quotation: T-1--93 PHONE 218-736-5681 Quotation To: 1706 INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD. FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA 56537 0,tny O F MAPIZWooD PA R K.5 i2Ee2EAT1oAJ DEVI- A7wva. 78n7 /0) tNcA-e a 1 Specification Number Item Description Approximate Quantities Unit Price Amount Dollars Cents Dollars Cents AAAwLUX-PLt-_000D O"PARI!< IWO (!-D- eewEa 0 YoqA 76 7-A ch zsomw w2 S__ MAAMAO Srro-,,&) Z,17 -e 36 x 6 0 �! t1 -r,..14 Lf rE A 6A)• too A LUMIA1 UAA qs"* b P. I 60 A)T O L�. — This Company is an Equal Employment Opportunity Emplo ver — AN v 1 _ INFORMATIONAL SIGNS IN CITY PARKS r� (4) � E HA Z ELWOOD E (4) MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS (2) HARVEST J (2)... VISTA HILLS i (2) HILLSIDE f (2). GOODRICH (2)* AFTON HEIGHTS (2) FOUR SEASONS (2) WESTERN HILLS (2) PLEASANTVI EW GERANIUM SHERWOOD PLAYCREST EDGERTON KOHLMAN WAKEFIELD GLOSTER FLICEK GETHSEMANE ROBINHOOD GLADSTONE (5) UNDESIGNATED 40 TOTAL MEMORANDUM Action by Council ®J Endorsed TO: City Manager Modified....., FROM: Director of Community Development Re ° e c t e SUBJECT: Commercial Pro Stud - `� . P'�Y 3� Date DATE: June 30, 1993 INTRODUCTION The City Council should review the attached list of issues for the commercial property study. BACKGROUND On March 22, 1993, the City Council approved the Planning Commission's recommendation for a commercial property study. The Council directed the staff to initiate and coordinate a commercial property study. The study is to evaluate the realationship between commercial and residential zones and the control of the intensity of commercial property. DISCUSSION The Planning Commission developed a list of issues to study. The HRA and Community Design Review Board have approved this list. The Council should review it and make any changes or additions they want before we start this study. RECOMMENDATION Review the attached list of issues and make any changes or additions. go/b-5:commiss.mem (4.55). Attachment: List of Issues WHAT PROBLEMS DOES THE CITY HAVE WITH COMMERCIAL AREAS OR MAJOR STREET CORRIDORS? PROTECTING SINGLE DWELLING NEIGHBORHOODS FROM COMMERCIAL USES I. The City should determine if there are intra -city land use conflicts at the Cites boundaries. An example is the meet of a proposed I-494 interchange in Woodbury on traffic and development in Maplewood. Another example, the area of Century Avenue and Stillwater load. 2. Single and double dwellings around commercial uses are becoming blighted. An example is the homes west of Duluth Street on County Road C. The City has zoned them commercial. This discourages property owners from mainaini tng these homes. 3. There is not enough buffer between R-1 (single dwelling) and commercial or multiple dwellings. (We are excluding mixed use planned unit developments from this problem.) 4. Bothersome types of commercial, such as fast food, are too close to single dwellings. These commercial uses create nuisances, such as litter. 5. The City needs to ease and relieve commercial noise, trespassing, visual impact and traffic infiltration through single dwelling neighborhoods. 6. Is the City planning transition uses between commercial and single or double dwellings or following the market? 7. Continuous commercial spread along major streets and around the corner into residential neighborhoods. 8. Non-conforniing commercial uses in residential zones, such as Don John's commercial business on Stillwater Avenue. GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROBLEMS 9. The Mall area is already overdeveloped with commercial uses. Additional commercial development will create .problems for surrounding land uses—traffic congestion, esthetics, too many signs, too little green area and too many people. 10. The City does not regulate commercial uses based on intensity of use. The City should only allow parking ramps to increase green space but not to increase building area. 2 11. Commercial and apartment development increase crime and bring in gangs from outside the City.. TRAFFIC 12. Traffic on Hazelwood Avenue from Highway 36 to County Road D. 13. Traffic conflicts at County Road B and White Bear Avenue. (Caused by the Fina station.) The proposed Community Center will worsen the situation. 14. Traffic around the Mall area as it develops. 15. Do we need a new interchange on I-694, between Highway 61 and McKnight Road? What would be the impact on the Mall? 16. Traffic problems on North St. Paul Road and Ripley Avenue if the School District builds a high school on Goodrich Golf Course.. 17. Road jurisdiction (turn -back of roads to the City). What condition will the City get these streets in? What will be the cost to Maplewood? 18. Rice Street traffic. 19. Deed a bridge over the railroad tracks on Larpenteur Avenue, east of Rice Street. 20. Do the long-range plans for Highway 36 include frontage roads? 21. Can the fence be removed on the BN bridge over Highway 36 so people can use the bridge? IMPROVE COMMERCIAL DESIGN 22. The criteria for new commercial design. Need more green area and landscaping, maybe based on a percentage of value. Need breaks in parking lots for green areas and landscaping. Could the City allow a developer to phase in the parking as the project needs it? The City should review the parking standards in the ordinance. Sign criteria needs review. 23. Screening is not aesthetic between single dwellings and other uses. 24. Could builders put commercial mechanical equipment somewhere instead of on the roof? Owners do not maintain roof -screening and materials are not attractive. Consider metal instead of wood slats. Should there be special added conditions if the site abuts residential areas, P Y articularil where there are significant elevation differences? MISCELLANEOUS 25. Fiscal disparity: Does this effect the Cicommercial's decisions on commercial development? Is the .Metropolitan Council encouraging commercial development in the southwest and western suburbs by allowing highways. and utilities to be built there? Is the Met Council changing there direction. 26. Is the Fane Zone still valid? Should we limit it to farms? Should F areas be- R-1? The F zones do not reflect the planned land use. 27. Should we use or revise the PUD ordinance to use it as a transition zone and for small parcels? 28. How to deal with businesses that go out of business and redevelopment of existing businesses. How can the City control this? Changes in use have an effect on parking and possibly the surrounding uses. Can we require the new business to be brought up to current code standards? 4 Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 6-22-93 B. If the Shopp' ' Center Manager agrees, allow Goodyear to add aseven-foot- wide panel on e shopping center's main pylon. This panel shall be in the space that the ity approved for the Cinema "N" Draft House. Approval is subject to remo ' g the existing Goodyear sign panel. Boardmember Anitzb ger seconded Ayes --all C. Code Change - Buil ' ' PI Review Procedure Ordinance The Board discussed th three options proposed for this ordinance.. Boardmember Rob' on owed the Community Design Review Board recommend approval of the iinanc changing the procedure for review of building. plans to require that th City no ' the neighbors of a request for a different front setback. BoardmerpNer Erickson secdided Ayes --all _ D. Commercial Property Study The Board discussed limiting the number of issues to be studied and suggested studying areas such as Century Avenue, rather than White Bear Avenue. which will most likely become amulti-lane street in the future. Boardmember Thompson moved the Review Board accept the Commercial Property and Major Street Corridor Study and to further recommend that references to individuals and specific businesses be deleted from the report. Boardmember Anitzberger seconded Boardmember Anitzberger moved to amend the motion noting that the Review Board did not have any additions or deletions. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes --all The amended motion was voted on. Ayes --all VII. VISITOR PRESENTATION There were n)� visitor/6resentations. VIII. BOARD PRES TATIflNS A. June, 4 Co il Meeting: Boardmember Robinson reported on this meeting Hra Minutes of 5-11-93 -2- 7. NEW BUSINESS a. CommercW. Property Study Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. The HRA discussed the report and was .generally in agreement with the specifics of the staff report. The HRA questioned Number 3. They wondered whether the buffer area should apply to differing housing types in a PUD. b. Housing Maintenance Code Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. The HRA discussed this item but took no action on it. c. Manufactured Home Buying arcing -Gary Pearson t Comniissioer Pearson sented information about manufactured housing and financing t—,, the Co ' sion. The HRA viewed a video tape about manufactured housing. The, HRA 'cussed the current status of the mobile home industry. It has been difficultto ge financing for mobile homes built before 1976. This is because HUD rules for aiufactured housing began in 1976. These rules require improved construction an safety features in manufactured homes built since 1976. Thus, buyers of units b ' t before 1976 cannot get financing for them unless the units have been updated to et the current standards. 8. DATE OF N MEETIN a. June , 1993 9. ADJOUR MENT The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 7-6-93 3. The and one house would not alter the essential character of the 4. The City approved other homes on private dries s. This resolution req ' es that the property owners the following before the City issues a building ermit: 1. Record an agreeme t against the prop that: a. Requires that the roperty o maintain, plow and sand the driveway to the satisfaction f the Dire or of Public Safety. b. Holds the City ss an an emergency vehicle cannot get to the house because of the con din nor steepness of the driveway. The City Attorney shall daft this agreement. 2. Give the City Engine a gra ' ,drainage and erasion control plan for the proposed house an driveway. e driveway must be an all-weather surface, at least twelve fe wide, to mee the Fire Code. The house location must meet the requir ents of the Ci environmental protection ordinance for steep slopes. e City shall not iss a building permit unless the City Engineer an the Fire Marshal appr e this an. All construction must be according t this plan. 3. Install a ign at Sterling Street and the 'veway that states the address of the ho e and that the drive is private. B. Approv of a front setback of 745 feet for this ite. The owners may move the house er back if needed to meet the City's s pe ordinance. Commi Toner Gerke seconded Ayes --all The otion passed. D. Commercial Property Study .Secretary Olson presented the staff report. The Commission discussed this study and the list of discussion items to be submitted to the City Council. The Commission added a sentence to Number 24 as follows: "Should there be special added considerations when site immediately abuts residential areas, particularly where there are significant elevation differences?" QrW:W_ S MEMORANDUM .Action by Council -:I Endorsed TO: City Manager Modif i ed. FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rei e c t e SUBJECT: Ordinance—Building Plan Review Procedure Date DATE: June 17, 1993 iNrRouucnoN On February 22, 1993, the City Council directed the staff to investigate an ordinance. The ordinance would require the City to notify adjacent owners of a request to vary the front setback requirements. BACKGROUND Review Procedure If certain conditions apply, the City Code states that the Director of Community Development may allow a different front setback than normally required (Section 36- 70(b)). The Code requires afifteen-day appeal period after the Director approves a setback request (Section 25-65). Only the City Council and the applicant may appeal the Director's decision. (Refer to the ordinance on page 3.) Past Action 10-26-92: The City Council deleted the language that anyone may appeal the Director's approval. The Council changed this wording to limit appeals to the Council and applicant. The Council did not want to have an applicant wait for fifteen days if the Councilmembers were willing to waive their appeal right. OPTIONS 1. Make no change. 2. Require that the City notify the neighbors of a request for a different front setback. 3. Before accepting an application, require that an applicant get written approval from the adjacent property owners. DISCUSSION The City should notify the adjacent property owners of a changefrom the front setback requirements. We nota adjacent owners about administrative variances, which are similar to changes in the front setback. Since we already have afifteen-day appeal period to notify the applicant and Council, the applicant would not lose any additional time if we also notified adjacent property owners. Having the City notify the owners is better than having the applicant try to get a signed p(optionpetition 3) . People are often reluctant to sign a petition, even if they do not object to a change. Also, requiring a petition may cause delays if neighbors are on extended vacations. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. go\b-4:codechn2.mem (5.3) Attachment: Ordinance ORDINANCE NUMBER AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW OF BUILDING PLANS The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Section 25-65. Approval of Plans. (a) The City shall not issue a building permit for ^minor construction glans unless the director of community development approves the plans &%0& . The director shall also review plans for single dwellings, where required by Code. ' ' ' ' . The city council shall define minor construction by dollar valuations set by resolution, 4fi-^.=L&& a t„ t . Before approving the plans, the director must determine that the plans meet all city ordinances and policies, including the design standards in section 25-70(b). The director may send any minor construction planA * a ^'- S�� to the community design review board. The director shall send a copy of all approved plans to the city council. For , setback changes, the director shall also send a written notice and plan to the adient ,property owners. This notice shall advise the owners of their right to appe,�al the director's decision. (b) Only a city council member, community design review board member or an applicant may appeal the director's decision about a minor construction project. Only a city council member, ef an applicant or an adjacent property owner may appeal the director's decision about a single dwelling. The director shall send an appeal about a single dwelling to the city council. The director shall notify the applicant and the adjacent property owners of the meeting. The effected parties may waive their right to an appeal by informing the director of community development. An appeal must be received by the director of community development within fifteen (15) days. after the director sends a copy of the approved plan to the city council. The director shall send an appeal of a minor construction project to the community design review board. The board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to the city council within fifteen (15) days after the board's decision. (c) The City shall not issue a building permit for a major construction project unless the community design review board approves then A� plans. Mai or construction includes uroi ects not defined as minor construction, but does not include single dwellings. The board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to the city council within fifteen (15) days after the board's decision. However, no person shall revise a plan that the city council originally approved without their approval. 3 (d) This section shall not apply to interior construction,' repair, maintenance, underground tams,_ administrative variances or the same -style replacement of building parts, such as a new, roof, door or windows. .,(See Article VI for administrative variance mococe_dures.) Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the City Council approves it. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on _, 1993. Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 6-22-93 B. If the Shopping Cent Manager agrees, allow Goodyear to add a seven -foot - wide panel on the shop ' g center's main pylon. This panel shall be in the space that the City ap o ed for the Cinema. "N' Draft House. Approval is subject to removin e ._ting Goodyear sign panel. Boardmember Ani erger seconded Ayes --all C. Code Change -Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance The Board discussed the three options proposed for this ordinance. Boardmember Robinson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend 41 approval of the ordinance changing the procedure for review of building plans to require that the City notify the neighbors of a request for a different front setback. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes --all D. Commercial Property Study The Bo discussed limiting the numbe of issues to be studied and suggested studying as such as Century Avenue rather than White Bear Avenue which will most likely ecome a multi -lane street the future. Boardmember ompson moved th eview Board accept the Commercial Property and Major Stre Corridor Study d to further recommend that references to individuals ands ecific business be deleted from the report. Boardmember Anit'�berger seconded Boardmember Anitzbe eri moved to amend the motion noting that the Review Board did not have any dditions or deletions. Boardmember Thomoon kconded Ayes --all The amended motjbn was vo%d on. Ayes --all VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There were no visitor presentations. VIII. BOARD PRES NTAQNS \' a A. June 14 ouncil Meeting: Boardmember Robinson reported on this meeting MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Subj: System Development Date: July 16, 1993 J ' to Action by Council., Recreatio--_ o se diie� Rejected=--- Date., Introduction For many years, the Park Development Fund has included an item referred to as "System Development". Items such as picnic tables, benches, waste receptacles, bike racks, replacement trees and fencing have been charged to this city-wide Park System Account.. Funding of the account has been from PAC Com- mercial monies. Background The Park and Recreation Commission and staff have reviewed the parks and listed'a number of items that could be purchased and installed through the Systems Account. Since many of these items are minor, it is easier to combine them in one account and have them all approved at one time, rather than having to return to the City Council for each item. The fund has now been de- pleted and it is requested that it be replenished from Commercial PAC monies. Examples of what we expect to purchase this summer include: Trees for Gloster, Goodrich, Kohlman, Maplewood Heights and Playcrest Parks..................$5000.00 Trail Benches for Afton, Goodrich and Flicek Parks on 51x8' cement slabs...................................$2575.00 Pedestal Picnic Tables for Hillside and Robinhood Parks on 101x10' cement pads.............$2000.00 Grills on 41x4' cement pads ............................$ 700.00 Players Benches (151) for Afton, Sherwood and Pleasantview Parks on 51x 20' cement slabs.............$9060.00 Chainlink Fence for Flicek, Geranium and Western Hills Parks....................................$3315.00 Tennis Bangboard and Plastic Windscreen for Harvest Park...........................................$3375.00 Tennis Bangboard for Playcrest Park .................... $19 5 0.0 0 Asphalt Basketball Courts 601x 60' at Flicek, Goodrich and Western Hills Parks..............$18000.00 Basketball Standards/Backboards/Hoops for Flicek, Goodrich and Western Hills Parks............... 3750.00 Sod for area by Goodrich Concession Stand..............$3000.00 These are merely an indication of items and approximate costs for this summer Recommendation it is requested that the City Council authorize $52,725 from the PAC Commercial Fund for "Systems Development" items in the Park Development Fund, c: City Clerk TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director AGENDA REPORT 1 S AGENDA NO. .Action by Council:®I Endorsed Modif i ed Rei ectec� Date RE: PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 1993 EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, TAX INCREMENT BONDS AND REFUNDING BONDS DATE: July 20, 1993 PROPOSAL It is proposed that three 1993 bond issues be approved. These bond issues consist of (A) $215,000 of Equipment Certificates to finance replacement of an ambulance and the Public Safety Department records system upgrade, (B) $8,190,000 Tac Increment Bonds to finance the Community Center project and (C) $4,840,000 Refunding Bonds to refinance, at a lower interest rate, existing debt. BACKGROUND The 1993 Budget of the Capital Improvement Projects Fund provides that Equipment Certificates be issued in 1993. The proceeds from these certificates will be used to provide $82,500 for the replacement of an ambulance and $130,000 to upgrade the Public Safety Department computer system for records management. Principal and interest payments on the certificates will be financed by property tax levies payable in 1994 through 1998 in amounts ranging from approximately $48,000 to $53,000. The financing plan for the Community Center project provides that tax increment bonds be issued that will be retired with a combination of property tax levies and tax increment revenues. Last September when the Council held public hearings on the Community Center project it was anticipated that $8,615,000 of tax increment bonds would be required for the project. It was also anticipated that these bonds would require a property tax levy of $325,000 payable in 1994 with subsequent annual property tax levies increasing by 3 % annually until the bonds were retired in the year 2015. The latest financial projections indicate that $8,190,000 of tax increment bonds will be required for the project. The property tax levy payable in 1994 will be $189,000 and subsequent annual property tax levies will increase by 3 % annually until the bonds are retired in the year 2015. The lower annual property tax levy is due primarily to higher anticipated tax increment revenues and lower interest costs on the bonds. Agenda Report - Preliminary Approval of 1993 Equipment Certificates, Tax Increment Bonds, and Refunding Bonds July 20, 1993 Page 2 Bonds were issued in 1990 and 1989 to finance public improvements. The outstanding bonds for these issues total $4,935,000 and have an average interest rate of 6.66% and 6.70% respectively. New bonds can be issued at an approximate rate of 5.07% to refinance this existing debt. The refinancing will save the City approximately $490,884 over the next 17 years. The estimated present value of these savings is $248,090. The attached 29 -page report prepared by Springsted Inc. provides additional information. It also recommends a bid award on the bond sale at a special Council meeting at 4:30 p.m. on Monday, August 30th. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council (A) schedule a special Council meeting at 4:30 p.m. on Monday, August 30th for a bid award on the 1993 bond issues, (B) adopt the attached resolution which provides preliminary approval for the sale of $215,000 General Obligation Improvement Equipment Certificates, (C) adopt the attached resolution which provides preliminary approval for the sale of $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds and (D) adopt the attached resolution which provides preliminary approval for the sale of $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds. WAAGM93BONDS Recommendations For City of Maplewood, Minnesota $215,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1993A $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993B $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C Study No. M1408F1 G1H1 maplewo2.ci SPRINGSTED Incorporated July 19, 1993 Mayor Gary Bastian Members, City Council Mr. Michael McGuire, City Manager Mr. Dan Faust, Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of: $215,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1993A $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993B $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C Introduction We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the issuance of these obligations in accordance with the attached Terms of Proposal. The recommendations describe the financing plans to issue the above-named obligations. These recommendations also will discuss each new issue separately and then address items common to all issues. General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1993A (the "Certificates) Proceeds of the Certificates will be used to finance 1993 equipment purchases of computer equipment and the purchase of an ambulance. The composition of this issue is as follows: Equipment Costs $212,500 Costs of Issuance' 11180 Allowance for Discount Bidding 1,320 Total Certificate Issue $215,000 The Certificates are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 410.32 and 412.301, which allow the City to issue certificates to purchase capital equipment. Pursuant to Section 412.301, the City may issue equipment certificates in an amount equal to 0.25% of the market value of the taxable property in the City without publication of a resolution determining to issue them, and without being subject to a reverse referendum. The City's 1992/93 S P R I N GST E D 120 South Sixth Street Suite 2507 sr PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS Minneapolis, MN 55402-1800 -> (612) 333-9177 Fax: (612) 349-5230 Home Office 85 East Seventh Place 16655 West Bluemound Road Suite 100 Suite 290 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2143 Brookfield, WI 53005-5935 (612) 223-3000 (414) 782-8222 Fax: (612) 223-3002 Fax: (414) 782-2904 6800 College Boulevard Suite 600 Overland Park, KS 66211-1533 (913) 345-8062 Fax: (913) 345-1770 July 19, 1993 1800K Street NW Suite 831 Washington, DC 20006-2200 (202) 466-3344 Fax: (202) 223-1362 Mayor Gary Bastian Members, City Council Mr. Michael McGuire, City Manager Mr. Dan Faust, Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of: $215,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1993A $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993B $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C Introduction We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the issuance of these obligations in accordance with the attached Terms of Proposal. The recommendations describe the financing plans to issue the above-named obligations. These recommendations also will discuss each new issue separately and then address items common to all issues. General Obligation Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 1993A (the "Certificates) Proceeds of the Certificates will be used to finance 1993 equipment purchases of computer equipment and the purchase of an ambulance. The composition of this issue is as follows: Equipment Costs $212,500 Costs of Issuance' 11180 Allowance for Discount Bidding 1,320 Total Certificate Issue $215,000 The Certificates are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 410.32 and 412.301, which allow the City to issue certificates to purchase capital equipment. Pursuant to Section 412.301, the City may issue equipment certificates in an amount equal to 0.25% of the market value of the taxable property in the City without publication of a resolution determining to issue them, and without being subject to a reverse referendum. The City's 1992/93 City of Maplewood, Minnesota July 19, 1993 estimated market value is $1,342,099,600, 0.25% of which is $3,355,249. The amount of the Certificates is well within this limit. Included in the principal amount of the Certificates is an allowance for an underwriter's discount in the amount of $1,320, or $6/$1 000 bond. The Certificates will be dated September 1, .1993 and will mature August 1, 1994 through 1998 to be repaid in five years in equal annual installments of principal and interest from a general ad valorem tax levy. Appendix I shows the repayment schedule for the Certificates. The Certificates have been structured with approximately even annual debt service payments. The City will levy annually (1993-1997) in an amount equal to the principal and interest coming due on August 1 of each collection year and the interest due February 1 of the following year. A cash flow problem may arise with principal being paid from first-half tax collections. It is our understanding that the City is prepared to temporarily fund the cash flow internally. General obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993B (the "Tax Increment Bonds") The Tax Increment Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 475 and 469. Proceeds from the Tax Increment Bonds will be used to finance the construction of a City Community Center. The Community Center will provide community meeting rooms, a banquet facility, a live performing arts area, crafts rooms, senior citizen and teen areas, gyms, fitness areas, a lap pool and a leisure pool. The composition of this issue is as follows: Project Costs $11,247,056 Allowance for Underwriter's Discount 106,470 Costs of Issuance 50,000 Subtotal $1114032526 Less: Cash on Hand (1,523,400) 2nd Installment 1993 Tax Increment (855,047) 1 st Installment 1994 Tax Increment (769,933) Investment Earnings _(65,146) Net Tax Increment Bond Issue $ 8,190,000 Amortization Schedule Appendix II, Schedule A, is the amortization schedule for this issue. The Tax Increment Bonds will be dated September 1, 1993 and will mature each February 1, 1995 through 2015. The maturity schedule was developed to blend with available tax increment revenues; existing debt service payable from those same tax increment revenues; and a 1994 tax levy of $189,000, increasing 3% annually. The tax increments will be generated from the City's existing Economic Development Districts No. 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3 and Housing Districts No. 1-1, 1-2 and 1- 3. Debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds will be paid from tax increment revenues collected the same year. This may create a cash flow problem at times, but the City has informed us that they will temporarily fund any deficit internally. Schedule B of Appendix II sets forth the cash flow analysis for the Tax Increment Bonds. The revenues include the tax increment stream, Tax Increment Bond proceeds, investment earnings on the Tax Increment Bond proceeds and tax collections. The expenditures include a City administrative fee, which is based on 5% of projected tax increments; the existing debt service Page 2 City of Maplewood, Minnesota July 19, 1993 payable from the same tax increments; debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds; an equity transfer to pay other eligible project costs; and Community Center project cost expenditures. Schedule .0 of Appendix II sets forth the estimated investment earnings on the Tax Increment Bond proceeds and tax increment payments. $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C (the "Improvement Refunding Bonds") Plan of Refunding Proceeds from the Improvement Refunding Bonds along with an estimated $230,091 of City funds on hand will advance refund, by means of a crossover refunding, portions of the City's $5,000,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds dated December 1, 1990 (the 1990 Bonds") and the City's $1,470,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds dated November 1, 1989 (the 1989 Bonds"), as shown below. Total Amount of Maturities Issues to Dated Date Maturities to Date of Call Being Called be Refunded of issues be Refunded for Redemption for Redemption $5,000,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds 12-1-1990 1999-2010 12-1-1998 $31860,000 $1,4709000 G.O. Improvement Bonds 11-1-1989 1996-2009 8-1-1995 19075,000 Total $4,9359000 The 1990 Bonds and 1989 Bonds were both originally issued to finance public improvements throughout the City. Based on current market conditions, it is our recommendation that the City proceed with the sale of a "crossover" refunding bond issue that would advance refund all of the callable maturities of the 1990 Bonds and the 1989 Bonds. These callable bonds are currently outstanding at net interest rates of 6.66% on the 1990 Bonds and 6.70% on the 1989 Bonds. We project that the 1990 Bonds and 1989 Bonds could be refunded at a net interest rate of approximately 5.07%, resulting in a total savings to the City, net of all costs of issuance, of approximately $490,884. The estimated present value net savings is $248,090. In a crossover refunding, the proceeds of the refunding (new issue) bonds are placed in an escrow account with a major bank and invested in government securities. These securities and their earnings are structured to pay debt service on the new bonds until the respective call dates on the 1990 Bonds and 1989 Bonds, at which time the escrow account will crossover and pay the remaining principal of the original issues by calling in all of the remaining "called" maturities. The City will continue to collect taxes and special assessments to pay debt service on the original issues through their respective call dates. The City will then crossover and begin paying debt service on the new issue. Refunding Anal Appendices III and IV are the individual analytical summaries. of each of the issues being refunded. Schedule A in Appendices III and IV shows the debt service on the refunded bonds Page 3 City of Maplewood, Minnesota July 19, 1993 as each now exists. Schedule B shows the estimated debt service for that portion of the new crossover refunding -bonds attributable to each refunded issue. Schedule C is the individual anticipated annual savings analyses based on current rates in the bond market. Please note that Schedule C of Appendix III shows a negative savings amount of $33,341 in 1998. This occurs because the 1990 Bonds were on a December 1 principal payment schedule and the Improvement Refunding Bonds are on a February 1 principal payment schedule. Appendix V, Schedule A, is a summary of the two individual issues being refunded. Amortization Schedule Appendix V, Schedule B, is the amortization schedule for the Improvement Refunding Bonds. This refunding (new) issue will be dated September 1, 1993 and will mature February 1, 1997 through 2011. Interest on these bonds due February 1, 1994 through August 1, 1995 will be payable solely from the escrow account, as discussed previously, established upon the sale of this issue. Interest on these bonds due February 1, 1996 through February 1, 1999 will be payable from a combination of escrow monies and special assessments/tax collections filed for this issue. Thereafter, beginning with the August 1, 1999 interest payment, the debt service on this issue will be made entirely from special assessments and tax collections. The Improvement Refunding Bonds as now structured includes an additional $135,000 which will be used to pay for all costs of issuance, including bond discount and rating fees, and to supplement the escrow account because of yield restrictions. All savings estimates are net of all these costs. The actual underwriters discount on the Improvement Refunding Bonds, and actual cost of issuance, may differ from the assumptions made in these recommendations. The amount of money needed in the escrow account may also differ from the amount projected because of interest rate fluctuation. Therefore, we have included a provision in the offering to permit the City to increase or decrease the principal in any of the maturities in a total amount not to exceed $200,000 to offset any fluctuation. Common to All Issues Prepayment Option We recommend the Tax Increment Bonds and Improvement Refunding Bonds maturing on or after February 1, 2004 be subject to payment in advance of their stated maturity dates as early as February 1, 2003, and on any date thereafter, at a price of par and accrued interest. This call feature will permit the refinancing or prepayment of the bonds if future circumstances warrant. We recommend that the Certificates not be subject to optional redemption due to the short term of the issue. Ratin s Rating applications will be made to Moody's Investors Service and Standard & Poor's Corporation for these issues. We will provide the rating agencies with the necessary data upon which they will make their rating analyses. The cost of the rating fees has been pro -rated in the issuance costs for each individual issue and the pro -rata portion of the rating fees for the refunding issue will be paid directly from money in the escrow account. We have recommended to City staff that representatives of the City and Springsted Incorporated visit the Moody's and S & P analytical staff in New York for the main purpose of explaining the financial impact of the Community Center on the City. Springsted will make all of the arrangements for the trip to New York. Page 4 City of Maplewood, Minnesota July 19, 1993 Federal Arbitrage - Rebate These issues are subject to federal arbitrage regulations. The 1986 Tax Reform Act and the 1989 amendments to the Act introduced and modified rebating arbitrage profits to the U.S. Treasury. Generally speaking, all arbitrage profits (the yield difference between the earnings on the investments and the yield on the obligations) must be rebated to the Treasury. There are some exemptions to this rebate requirement which include: (i) A small issuer exemption if the bonds are for governmental purposes and the issuer reasonably expects to issue not more than $5,000,000 tax-exempt bonds during the calendar year. (ii) A six-month exemption if all of the proceeds are expended within six months of bond issuance. (iii) A two-year expenditure test if at least 75% of the proceeds of the issue are used for construction and -if 10% is expended within six months, 45% within 12 months, 75% within 18 months and 100% within two years. If it is reasonably required that a retainage be maintained to enforce the completion of. a contract, up to 5% of the proceeds may be retained for an additional 12 months. Net proceeds. subject to these expenditure tests include investment earnings on the original bond proceeds. The Certificates: It is our understanding that the proceeds from the Certificates will be expended within six months and therefore will be exempt from any arbitrage rebate. The Tax Increment Bonds: Based on the disbursement schedule for the Tax Increment Bonds, it appears they will qualify under item (iii) listed above. This exemption is based on a test of absolute requirements and is not based on reasonable expectations, and the spend down requirements include the additional income earned from the reinvestment of bond proceeds. The Improvement Refunding Bonds: The City will be exempt from rebate on the Improvement Refunding Bonds because the escrow account, funded from bond proceeds, will be invested in securities at a yield less than the new refunding bond yield, thus creating no arbitrage. Another potential source of rebate stems from the debt service fund to pay debt service on the new bonds. The City will be exempt from rebate from this source so long as it maintains a "bona fide" debt service fund. A bona fide debt service fund requires that no more than 13 months of debt service money be accumulated. Federal Arbitrage - Reimbursement Regulations The Certificates and the Tax Increment Bonds are also subject to the reimbursement bond regulations established by the Internal Revenue Service. These regulations apply to any tax- exempt borrowed proceeds which are intended to be used to reimburse the City for project expenditures paid before the actual receipt of the proceeds. The regulations do not apply to proceeds used to make direct payment of project costs initially paid on or after the actual closing date. It is our understanding that a reimbursement resolution is in place for the Certificates and the Tax Increment Bonds. Page 5 City of Maplewood, Minnesota July 19, 1993 , Bank Qualification The 1986 Tax Reform Act provides that issuers of less than $10,000,000 of tax-exempt obligations in a calendar year of issuance may declare them to be bank -qualified. The City will not meet this qualification and, therefore, the issues cannot be declared bank -qualified. This designation would permit financial institutions to deduct from income, for federal income tax purposes, interest expense that is allowable to carry and acquire tax-exempt obligations. Without that designation these issues will not be as attractive an investment to financial institutions. Therefore, the interest rates received will be slightly higher than if the issues were designated bank -qualified. We have built that interest rate differential into our estimates of the interest rates used in the attached schedules. Sale Process We recommend these issues be offered for sale on Monday, August 30, 1993, with proposals received at the offices of Springsted Incorporated at 11:00 A.M. During the remainder of the day, proposals will be verified and checked for accuracy, and the necessary computer calculations will be made in order to determine the benefits of the refunding. We will then present the bids and our recommendations to the Council at its special meeting at 4:30 P.M. later that day. In comparison with the issue amounts of the Tax Increment Bonds and the Improvement Refunding Bonds, the issue amount for the Certificates is very small. This size relationship may result in a fewer number of proposals received. Respectfully submitted, SPRINGSTED Incorporated sms Page 6 City of Maplewood, Minnesota 1 G.O. Equipment Certificates Dated: 9-1-1993 Mature: 8-1 First Interest: 8— 1-1994 APPENDIX 1 Bond Years: 642.08 Annual Interest: 24,063 Avg. Maturity: 2.99 Plus Discount: 11320 Avg. Annual Rate: 3.748% Net Interest: Total T.I.C. Rate: 3.951% N.I.C. Rate: Year of Year of Interest rates are estimates; changes may cause significant Principal 105% Levy Mat. Principal Rates Interest & Interest of Total (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 1993 1994 40,000 2.55% 10,145 500145 52,652 1994 1995 40,000 3.20% 51861 45,861 489154 1995 1996 45,000 3.60% 41411 49,411 51,882 1996 1997 45,000 3.90% 21723 47,723 50,109 1997 1998. 45,000 4.10% 923 45,923 48,219 TOTALS: 215,000 24,063 239,063 2519016 Bond Years: 642.08 Annual Interest: 24,063 Avg. Maturity: 2.99 Plus Discount: 11320 Avg. Annual Rate: 3.748% Net Interest: 25,383 T.I.C. Rate: 3.951% N.I.C. Rate: 3.953% Annual payments include the interest payment following the maturity date. Interest rates are estimates; changes may cause significant alterations of this schedule. The actual underwriter's discount bid may also vary. Prepared 16—Jul-93 by SPRINGSTED Incorporated. Page 7 fir. MAPLEWOOD, !NNESOTA G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 19938 YEAR 1993 1994 ANNUAL INTEREST P:& I P & t 161,967.71 MONTH DAY DATED DATE 9 1 1STINTEREST 2 1 179,321.25 179,321.25 1,313,682.50 .E: ;aAT...... PRINCIPAL RATE 172,481.25 172,481.25 731,802.50 02/01/94 0 2.55 08/01/94 164,681.25 737,162.50 02/01/95 940,000 3.20 08/01/95 157,096.25 691,777.50 02/01/96 380,000 3.60 08/01/96 156,458.75 343,555.00 02/01/97 400,000 3.90 08/01/97 155,457.50 356,916.25 02/01/98 370,000 4.10 08/01/98 151, 432.50 481, 890.00 02/01/99 30,000 4.25 08/01/99 144,265.00 600,697.50 02/01/2000 45,000 4.45 08/01/2000 136,308.75 615,573.75 02/01/2001 175,000 4.60 08/01/2001 127,942.50 609,251.25 02/01/2002 305,000 4.70 08/01/2002 118,908.75 611,851.25 02/01/2003 335,000 4.75 08/01/2003 108,963.75 617,872.50 02/01/2004 345,000 4.85 08/01/2004 98,148.75 627,112.50 02/01/2005 365,000 4.95 08/01/2005 86,448.75 634,597.50 02/01/2006 390,000 5.10 08/01/2006 72,142.50 703,591.25 02/01/2007 420,000 5.15 08/01/2007 56,375.00 723,517.50 02/01/2008 450,000 5.20 08/01/2008 39, 522.50 725,897.50 02/01/2009 545,000 5.25 08/01/2009 30, 962.50 390, 485.00 02/01/2010 595,000 5.30 08/01/2010 21,600.00 402,562.50 02/01/2011 630,000 5.35 08/01/2011 11,205.00 417,805.00 02/01/2012 320,000 5.35 08/01/2012 0.00 426,205.00 02/01/2013 350,000 5.35 08/01/2013 13,120,135.21 13,120,135.21 02/01/2014 385,000 5.40 08/01/2014 02/01/2015 415,000 5.40 08/01/2015 02/01/2016 8,190, 000.00 YEAR 1993 1994 ANNUAL INTEREST P:& I P & t 161,967.71 161,967.71 194,361.25 194,361.25 356,328.96 194,361.25 1,134,361.25 179,321.25 179,321.25 1,313,682.50 179,321.25 5590321.25 172,481.25 172,481.25 731,802.50 172,481.25 572,481.25 164,681.25 164,681.25 737,162.50 164,681.25 534,681.25 157,096.25 157,096.25 691,777.50 157,096.25 187, 096.2 5 156,458.75 156,458.75 343,555.00 156,458.75 201,458.75 155,457.50 155,457.50 356,916.25 155,457.50 330,457.50 151, 432.50 151, 432.50 481, 890.00 151, 432.50 456, 432.50 144,265.00 144,265.00 600,697.50 144,265.00 479,265.00 136,308.75 136,308.75 615,573.75 136,308.75 481,308.75 127,942.50 127,942.50 609,251.25 127,942.50 492,942.50 118,908.75 118,908.75 611,851.25 118,908.75 508,908.75 108,963.75 108,963.75 617,872.50 108,963.75 528,963.75 98,148.75 98,148.75 627,112.50 98,148.75 548,148.75 86,448.75 86,448.75 634,597.50 86,448.75 631,448.75 72,142.50 72,142.50 703,591.25 72,142.50 667,142.50 56,375.00 56,375.00 723,517.50 56,375.00 686,375.00 39, 522.50 39, 522.50 725,897.50 39, 522.50 359, 522.50 30, 962.50 30, 962.50 390, 485.00 30,962.50 380,962.50 21,600.00 21,600.00 402,562.50 21, 600.00 406, 600.00 11,205.00 11,205.00 417,805.00 11,205.00 426,205.00 0.00 0.00 426,205.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,930,135.21 13,120,135.21 13,120,135.21 PREPARED BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED: (19--Jul--93 ) APPENDIX 11 SCHEDULE A PAR $8,190,000.00 DISCOUNT (106,470.00) COSTS OF ISS. (50,000.00) PROJECT FUNDS $8,033,530.00 ALTERNATE A-T.I. APPLICATIO Page 8 m T w Hcc O W Lu Z o Z Z m O z J (, 0- V z W O O _ � d a 0 0 U APPENDIX li SCHEDULE B N a' cc d Y c Z ami N D .0 -ft, AIMAk O O 8 O 8 C O cc0�� 'a O 2 aoi O 0 cM 00 v 0o w W U Lu D J Q Z z W Q W m O U Z O � O OU � U) O O I OD o M ao W > W Lu U X Z J J > j z Z a Q Page 9 9 6 a z w 07 Z w V) CIO w Q w lL: t0 (O N of (O top tt� d�ryy !A CO fpp` tMMo t�0p O 0�0 O� In O �0p0 O Grpp - Q:: ti ti O •- N O to .0 to -- (O O O N (O -ti 1` r` M ao N �- It') to in 00 T O r if) N M l' V CO) r r r T N N N N N N N r r :: O N CV vN 0r T W N M O� to r' d' to M f` (0 to (0 T 0) i` r' f` V O O M N 00 N <O O T N CO O M O M 00 r N to N (0 N VJ O u) 1` q* r` to W (o (O a) 00 (O V O It O 00 O to O to •- M N a) N to N V 19t O (0 O •- N O N a1 O - (0 (0 h (O (O I` 1` i` � N N M v v v U $ O(O e 0 W. 0o ((D ao o r: LL-cr- - .. M « Z. Q�. N N �:��:.� ..:� ..LLJ W- W O NM M M M 0 r -OO O 0 d t` ro ro tM~ 00 0 Or- 00 0 MM M0 Oto Oto to M •- zO W cf rz 1-7 O C6 WT 0 0 Oto O a) O t rleMMto M O N N ON O O O N O (. W M M fes• 1` (O M M et (0 (O (O (O (O (0 (O I` ti I` M d' a rN-• X W . J a) r r to M to 0) M O N 00 (0 M 00 a) to �0 O 00 00 O O O O O O N W: : �;::::...... U: �: tr) 00 06 M 00 r- 00 N (O M r ti M D1 � to (0. (0 M (~0 •- N t000 cOt)� Ldpo• OM cM�� cMo tccfOO� LO0 LOO ILcnp0 to to Lopp Lf) to LOp trcopp Ul)) tccopO Lf) (NO to (N O to Oj (O to (NO to Nv to 00 (O I` Ici f` M (0 N a) M N N N N N N N N N r N r N r N r N M M M M M 00 Lu.* J � Q W O CVO to c'7 t� O t` •- 0 to 00 N O tf) I- tf) mt O) �- r- O O O) O r- 00 c0 N to O 1� to to O 00 P- 00 r- tf) It O (0 9t N 00 O N N a) ti 00 •- i� M (O N 0 00 O (0 F- z MM 00 �• IA �p 00 r- 00 �t r- 00 N M 00 M O SJ O 00 O (O T- to N M M N � , to �T O M OLLJ: M tT 00 : O. :.� h h (o d + O O w w 0 (0 c0 (0 N ti N N N N N M 'IT It v to E'er W a) r �••� T r r N .:. .: .. :.:...' .: O O O to T c\j M O W N (O V O N N O O O O N 0) (0 Cr) r a) N (0 to O a) 00 00 O (O M to o 0 O r opp W et et 0 O 0 V M 00 q1t N M N Rr M M V ::,� •: 00 O O O N T a r to N N CO) O M t0 V to (0 (0 h 00 O a) O (VV-:, ( r N .= M r= d' . = to r - L1;;::: T L6 ..... ',:: ' O: M N to W :� Z W w --n:: Z. . o 0 ..... T 8 o v ' •` O 00 (0 O (0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O� •- 00 00 v a) O a) M a) (f) a) M 0) M 0) M a) M 0) M a) M a) M a) M a) M a) M 0) N N N N 00 It Itt It V It v It It lit lt' d' lit d (0 cri r F`V CO. cli O cli O r r rO LLJ Lu LL W O O O O O O O OO O O O O OO OOOW D.. U -� Q 0 0 a"'i 0 as 2 9 8 0 0 (� � 0 (0 e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F- WQ a) T a) T a) r a) r m T o) T a) T rn r 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N N N N N N N N N N U >- m APPENDIX li SCHEDULE B N a' cc d Y c Z ami N D .0 -ft, AIMAk O O 8 O 8 C O cc0�� 'a O 2 aoi O 0 cM 00 v 0o w W U Lu D J Q Z z W Q W m O U Z O � O OU � U) O O I OD o M ao W > W Lu U X Z J J > j z Z a Q Page 9 9 6 a z w 07 Z w V) CIO w Q w 4;ITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA -1 G.O. TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1993B INVESTMENT EARNINGS/DISBURSEMENT SCHEDULE ANNUAL G.O. BOND PROCEEDS' CASH INTEREST . .....:.DATE DISBURSEMENTS. _.�DrSBURSENIENTS.-TAX-INCREMENT:. BALANCE 3.0000: Beg. Bal (12/31/92) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Jan -93 13,000.00 (13,000.00) 0.00 Feb -93 100,000.00 (113,000.00) 0.00 Mar - 93 100,000.00 (213,000.00) 0.00 Apr -93 100,000.00 (313,000.00) 0.00 May -93 100,000.00 (413,000.00) 0.00 Jun -93 213,000.00 0.00 (626,000.00) 0.00 Jul -93 313, 000.00 (939, 000.00) 0.00 Aug -93 413,000.00 (1,352,000.00) 0.00 Sep -93 513,000.00 8,033,530.00 6,168,530.00 15,421.32 Oct -93 813,000.00 5,370,951.33 13,427.38 Nov -93 1,013,000.00 4,371,378.70 10,928.45 Dec -93 1,237,400.00 4,928,400.00 855,047.46 3,999,954.61 9,999.89 Jan -94 1,013,000.00 2,996,954.50 71492.39 Feb -94 1,013,000.00 1,991,446.88 4,978.62 Mar -94 913,000.00 1,083,425.50 2,708.56 Apr -94 1,013,000.00 73,134.06 182.84 May -94 1,103,000.00 (1,029,683.10) 0.00 Jun -94 813,000.00 769,933.23 (1,072,749.87) 0.00 Jul -94 448,200.00 1,523,400.00 2,450.13 6.13 Aug -94 2,456.26 0.00 0.00 Sep -94 0.00 0.00 Oct -94 0.00 0.00 Nov -94 0.00 0.00 Dec -94 6,318,656.26 0.00 0.00 Jan - 95 0.00 0.00 Feb -95 . ' 0.00 0.00 Mar -95 0.00 0.00 Apr - 95 0.00 11,247,056.26 11,247,056.26 11,181,910.69 65,145.56 PREPARED BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED: (16 -Jul -93 ) APPENDIX Il SCHEDULE C ALTERNATE A-T.I. APPLICATIO Page 10 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Refunding Bonds, .Series 1993 Full Crossover Advance Refunding of G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 1990 Even Annual Savings Structure Issuer Funds Required: $0.00 Date of Bonds: 09/01/93 Deliver Date: 09/01/93 Refunded Call Date: 12/01/98 1 st Callable Date: 12/01/99 Comparison: Refunded Refunding Principal: 3, 860, 000 3, 980, 000 Bond Years: 48, 750.00 501188.33 Avg. Maturity: 12.630 12.610 NIC: 6.666% 5.196% 0' 'kap Net::S'avi:ng.s: 27.T:97.8.79 Pc:es:ent: Val. S avIngs 1:78,707.00 As % of P.V. Ref. Int.: 1:5-025%0. As % of P.V. Ref. D.S.: 5.49%0. Prepared: 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated APPENDIX III Page 11 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 1990 Existing Debt Service Date 12/01/93 06/01/94 12/01/94 06/01/95 12/01/95 06/01/96 12/01/96 06/01/97 12/01/97 06/01/.98 12/01/98 06/01/99 12/01/99 06/01/2000 12/01/2000 06/01/2001 12/01/2001 06/01/2002 12/01/2002 06/01/2003 12/01/2003 06/01/2004 12/01/2004 06/01/2005 12/01/2005 06/01/2006 12/01/2006 06/01/2007 12/01/2007 06/01/2008 12/01/2008 06/01/2009 12/01/2009 06/01/2010 12/01/2010 Principal 140,000.00 150,000.00 160,000.00 170,000.00 180,000.00 195,000.00. 210,000.00 225,000.00 240,000.00 255,000.00 275,000.00 300,000.00 320,000.00 345,000.00 375,000.00 405,000.00 435,000.00 475,000.00 Rate 5.800% 5.900% 6.000% 6.050% 6.100% 6.150% 6.250% 6.300% 6.400% 6.500% 6.500% 6.600% 6.700% 6.750% 6.750% 6.750% 6.750% 6.750% Interest 157,770.00 153,710.00 153,710.00 149,285.00 149,285.00 144,485.00 144,485.00 139,342.50 139,342.50 133,852.50 133,852.50 127,856.25 127,856.25 121, 293. 75 121f293,75 114,206.25 114,206.25 106,526.25 106,526.25 98,238.75 98,238.75 89,301.25 89,301.25 79,401.25 79,401.25 68f681,25 68f681.25 57,037.50 57,037.50 44,381.25 44,381.25 30,712.50 30,712.50 16,031.25 16,031.25 APPENDIX III SCHEDULE A Prepared! 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated Semi -Annual 297,770.00 153,710.00 303,710.00 149,285.00 309,285.00 144,485.00 314,485.00 139,342.50 319,342.50 133,852.50 328,852.50 127,856.25 337,856.25 121, 293 .75 346,293.75 114,206.25 354,206.25 106,526.25 361,526.25 98,238.75 373,238.75 89,301.25 389,301.25 79,401.25 399,401.25 68,681.25 413, 681.25 57,037.50 432,037.50 44,381.25 449,381.25 30,712.50 465,712.50 16,031.25 491, 031.25 Annual 297,770.00 457,420.00 458,570.00 458,970.00 458,685.00 462,705.00 46517-.12.50 467,587.50 468,412.50 468,052.50 471,477.50 478,602.50 478,802.50 482,362.50 489,075.00 493,762.50 496,425.00 507,062.50 Totals 41855,000.00 31506,455.00 81361,455.00 81361,455.00 Bond Years: 51,673.75 All lower calculations Refunded Bonds Only Avg, Mat..: 10.643 are made from the date Avg. Mat..: 12.63 NIC.......: 6.633% of the refunding bonds NIC.......: 6.666 Page 12 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 Refunding Debt Service Date .02/01/94 08/01/94 02/01/95 08/01/95 02/01/96 08/01/96 02/01/97 08/01/97 02/01/98 08/01/98 02/01/99 08/01/99 02/01/2000 08/01/2000 02/01/2001 08/01/2001 02/01/2002 08/01/2002 02/01/2003 08/01/2003 02/01/2004 08/01/2004 02/01/2005 08/01/2005 02/01/2006 08/01/2006 02/01/2007 08/01/2007 02/01/2008 08/01/2008 02/01/2009 08/01/2009 02/01/2010 08/01/2010 02/01/2011 Totals Bond Years: Avg. Mat..: NTC.......: Principal 240,000.00 255,000.00 265,000.00 275,000.00 295,000.00 315,000.00 330,000.00 350,000.00 375,000.00 400,000.00 425,000.00 455,000.00 3,980, 000.00 50,188.33 12.610 5.196% Rate 4.450% 4.600% 4.700% 4.750% 4.850% 4.950% 5.100% 5.150% 5.200% 5.250% 5.300% 5.350% APPENDIX III SCHEDULE B Prepared: 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated Interest Semi -Annual 83,354.16 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100, 025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100, 025.00 94,685.00 94,685.00 88,820.00 88,820.00 82,592.50 82,592.50 761061. 25 76,061.25 68,907.50 68,907.50 61,111.25 61,111.25 52,696.25 52,696.25 43,683.75 43,683.75 33,933.75 33,933.75 23,433.75 23,433.75 12, 171.25 12,171.25 21559,846.66 * Paid by escrow. All other payments made by the issuer. 83,354.16 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100, 025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100,025.00 100, 025.00 100r025.00' 100,025.00 340,025.00 94,685.00 349,685.00 88,820.00 353,820.00 82,592.50 357,592.50 76,061.25 371, 061.25 68,907.50 383,907.50 61,111.25 391,111.25 52f696.25 402,696.25 43,683.75 418,683.75 33,933.75 433,933.75 23,433.75 448,433.75 12, 171.25 467, 171.25 61539,846.66 Bond Date.: Delivery..: Bond Yield: Annual 83,354.16 200,050.00 200,050.00 200,050.00 200,050.00 200,050.00 440,050.00 444,370.00 442,640.00 440, 185.00 447,122.50 452,815.00 452,222.50 455,392.50 462,367.50 467,867.50 471,867.50 479,342.50 61539 1846. 66 09/01/93 09/01/93 5.05939% Page 13 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 Annual Savings Analysis APPENDIX 111 SCHEDULE C Prepared: 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated Totals Non -Refunded Refunding Total New Existing Savings Date Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service or (Loss) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) 12/01/93 297,770.00 297,770.00 297,770.00 06/01/94 12/01/94 457,420.00 457,420.00 457,420.00 06/01/95 ' 12/01/95 458,570.00 458,570.00 458,570.00 06/01/96 12/01/96 458,970.00 458,970.00 458,970.00 06/01/97 12/01/97 458,685.00 458,685.00 4581685.00 06/01/98 12/01/98 462, 705.00 33, 341.67 496, 046.67 462, 705.00 (33, 341.67) 06/01/99 12/01/99 440, 050.00 440, 050.00 465, 712.50 251662'.50 06/01/2000 12/01/2000 444,370.00 444,370.00 467,587.50 23,217.50 06/01/2001 12/01/2001 442,640.0-0- 442f640.00 468f412.50 25, 772.50 06/01/2002 12/01/2002 440,185.00 440,185.00 468,052.50 27,867.50 06/01/2003 12/01/2003 447,122.50 447,122.50 471,477.50 24,355.00 06/01/2004 12/01/2004 452,815.00 452,815.00 478,602.50 25,787.50 06/01/2005 12/01/2005 452,222.50 452,222.50 478,802.50 26,580.00 06/01/2006 12/01/2006 455,392.50 455,392.50 482,362.50 26,970.00 06/01/2007 12/01/2007 462,367.50 462,367.50 489,075.00 26,707.50 06/01/2008 12/01/2008 467,867.50 467,867.50 493,762.50 25,895.00 06/01/2009 12/01/2009 471,867.50 471,867.50 496,425.00 24,557.50 06/01/2010 12/01/2010 479,342.50 479,342.50 507,062.50 27,720.00 Totals 2,594,120.00 5,4891584.17 81083,704.17 8,361,455.00 277,750.83 Present Value Rate...: 5.05090% Excess Proceeds......: 227.96 Present Value Savings: 178,707.00 Funds to Sinking Fund: As '% of P.V. Ref. Int: 15.25% Total Net Savings....: 277,978.79 Page 14 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 Full Crossover Advance Refunding of G.O. Im rovement Bonds of 1989 Even Annual Savings Structure Issuer Funds Required: $230,091.15 Date of Bonds: 09/01/93 Deliver Date: 09/01/93 Refunded Call Date: 08/01/95 1st Callable Date. 08/01/96 Comparison: Refunded Refundin Principal: 1, 075, 000 860,000 Bond Years: 10, 255.42 8)203.33 Avg. Maturity: 9.540 9.539 NIC: 6.709% 5.020% 'Q:tai Net:::Savi.ngs: _�2� 2.905.1:.0, P.. r ...........s.b....n.- Value Savings: 6 ...... :5 . ... As °fQ of R.1C. Ref: l nt 17::67 ........... 6:his °��: of `P::v. Rof: D S. ; 4:C. Prepared: 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated APPENDIX IV Page 15 APPENDIX IV SCHEDULE A Maplewood, Minnesota Prepared: 07/15/93 G.O..Improvement Bonds of 1989 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated Existing Debt Service Date Principal Rate Interest Semi -Annual Annual 02/01/94 39,832.50 39,832.50 39,832.50 08/01/94 70,000.00 6.100% 39,832.50 109,832.50 02/01/95 37,697.50 37,697.50 147,530.00 08/01/95 70,000.00 6.150% 37,697.50 107,697.50 02/01/96 35,545.00 35,545.00 143,242.50 08/01/96 75,000.00 6.200% 35,545.00 110,545.00 02/01/97 33,220.00 33,220.00 143,765.00 08/01/97 751000.00 6.250% 33,220.00 108,220.00 02/01/98 30,876.25 30,876.25 139,096.25 08/01/98 75,000.00 6.300% 30,876.25 105,876.25 02/01/99 28,513.75 28,513,75 134f390.00 08/01/99 75,000.00 6.400% 28,513.75 103,513.75 02/01/2000 26r113.75 26,113.75 129, 627.50 08/01/2000 75,000.00 6.500% 26,113.75 101,113.75 02/01/2001 23,676.25 23,676.25 124,790.00 08/01/2001 75,000.00 6.600% 23,676.25 98,676.25 02/01/2002 21,201.25 211-201.25 119,877.50 08/01/2002 75,000.00 6.650% 21,201.25 96,201.25 02/01/2003 18,707.50 18,707.50 114,908.75 08/01/2003 75,000.00 6.700% 18,707.50 93,707.50 02/01/2004 16,195.00 16,195.00 109,902.50 08/01/2004 75, 000.00 6.750% 16, 195.00 91, 195.00 02/01/2005 13,663.75 13,663.75 104,858.75 08/01/2005 75,000.00 6.750% 13,663.75 88,663.75 02/01/2006 11,132.50 11,132.50 99,796.25 08/01/2006 80,000.00 6.800% 11,132.50 91,132.50 02/01/2007 81412.50 81412.50 99,545.00 08/01/2007 80,000.00 6.800% 8,412.50 88,412.50 02/01/2008 51692.50 51692.50 94,105.00 08/01/2008 80,000.00 6.900% 51692.50 85,692.50 02/01/2009 21932.50 21932.50 88,625.00 08/01/2009 85,000.00 6.900% 21932.50 87,932.50 02/01/2010 87,932.50 Totals Bond Years: Avg., Mat..: NIC.......: 11215,000.00 706,825.00 1,921,825.00 1,921,825.00 10,453.75 All lower calculations Refunded Bonds Only 8.604 are made from the date Avg. Mat..: 9.54 6:698% of the refunding bonds NIC.......: 6. 709 Page 16 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 Refunding Debt Service APPENDIX IV SCHEDULE B Prepared: 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated Date Principal Rate Interest Semi -Annual Annual 02/01/94 * Paid by escrow. Bond Date.: 16,890.63 16,890.63 * 16,890.63 08/01/94 Delivery..: 09/01/93 20,268.75 201268..75 made by the issuer. 02/01/95 5.03988% 20,268.75 20,268.75 * 40,537.50 08/01/95 20,268.75 20,268.75 02/01/96 20,268.75 20,268.75 40,537.50 08/01/96 20,268.75 20,268.75 02/01/97 70,000.00 3.900% 20,268.75 90,268.75 110,537.50 08/01/97 18,903.75 18,903.75 02/01/98 70,000.00 4.100% 18,903.75 881903.75 107,807.50 08/01/98 17,468.75 17f468.75 02/01/99 70,000.00 4.250% 17,468.75 87,468.75 104,937.50 08/01/99 15, 981.25 15, 981.25 02/01/2000 65,000.00 4.450% 15,981.25 80,981.25 96,962.50 08/01/2000 14,535.00 14,535.00 02/01/2001 65,000.00 4.600% 14,535.00 79,535.00 94,070.00 08/01/2001 13,040.00 13,040.00 02/01/2002 65,000.00 4.700% 13,040.00 78,040.00 91,080.00 08/01/2002 . 11, 512.50 11, 512.50 02/01/2003 60,000.00 4.750% 11,512.50 71,512.50 83,025.00 08/01/2003 10-, 087.50 10, 087.50 02/01/2004 60,000.00 4.850% 10,087.50 70,087.50 80,175.00 08/01/2004 8,632.50 81632.50 02/01/2005 60,000.00 4.950% 8,632.50 68,632.50 77,265.00 08/01/2005 7 , 147.50 71147.50 02/01/2006 55,000.00 5.100% 71147.50 62,147.50 69,295.00 08/01/2006 5,745.00 51745.00 02/01/2007 60,000.00 5.150% 51745.00 65,745.00 71,490.00 08/01/2007 41200.00 41200.00 02/01/2008 55,000.00 5.200% 4,200.00 59,200.00 63,400.00 08/01/2008 21770.00 21770.00 02/01/2009 50,000.00 5.250% 2,770.00 52,770.00 55,540.00 08/01/2009 1, 457.50 1, 457.50 02/01/2010 55,000.00 5.300% 11457.50 56,457.50 57,915.00 Totals 860,000.00 401,465.63 11261,465.63 11261,465.63 Bond Years: 81203.33 * Paid by escrow. Bond Date.: 09/01/93 Avg. Mat..: 9.539 All other payments Delivery..: 09/01/93 NIC.......: 5.,020% made by the issuer. Bond Yield: 5.03988% Page 17 Maplewood, Minnesota G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993 Annual Savings Analysis APPENDIX IV SCHEDULE C Prepared: 07/15/93 By SPRINGSTED Incorporated Non -Refunded Refunding Total New Existing Date Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 02/01/94 39,832.50 39,832.50 39,832.50 08/01/94. 02/01/95 147f530.00 147f530.00 147,530.00 08/01/95 02/01/96 107,697.50 20,268.75 127,966.25 143,242.50 08/01/96 02/01/97 110,537.50 110,537.50 143,765.00 08/01/97 02/01/98 107,807.50 107,807.50 139,096.25 08/01/98 02/01/99 104,937.50 104,937.50 134,390.00 08/01/99 02/01/2000 96,962.50 96,962.50 129,627.50 08/01/2000 02/01/2001 94,070.00 94,070.00 124,790.00 08/01/2001 02/01/2002 91,080.00 91,080.00 119,877.50 08/01/2002 02/01/2003 83,025.00 83,025.00 114,908.75 08/01/2003 02/01/2004 80,175.00 80,175.00 109,902.50 08/01/2004 02/01/2005 77,265.00 77,265.00 104,858.75 08/01/2005 02/01/2006 69,295.00 69,295.00 99,796.25 08/01/2006 02/01/2007 71,490.00 71,490.00 99,545.00 08/01/2007 02/01/2008 63,400.00 63,400.00 94,105.00 08/01/2008 02/01/2009 55,540.00 55,540.00 88,625.00 08/01/2009 02/01/2010 57,915.00 57,915.00 87,932.50 Totals 295,060.00 11183,768.75 Present Value Rate...: 5.05090% Present Value Savings: 69,382.54 As % of P.V. Ref. Int: 17.67% Savings or (Loss) (6) 15, 276.25 33,227.50 31,288.75 29,452.50 32,665.00 30,720.00 28,797.50 31,883.75 29,727.50 27,593.75 30,501.25 28,055.00. 30,705.00 33,085.00 30,017.50 11478,828.75 11921,825.00 442,996.25 Funds from Issuer....: (230,091.15) Funds to Sinking Fund: Total Net Savings....: 212,905.10 Page 18 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA G.O. REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1993A A SOURCES: TOTAL PRINCIPAL DISCOUNT (—) ACCRUED INTEREST FUNDS FROM ISSUER USES: OPEN MARKET SECURITIES EXPENSES BEGINNING CASH FOR ESCROW ACCRUED INTEREST EXCESS PROCEEDS TO Q.S. FUND FUTURE VALUE SAVINGS PRESENT VALUE SAVINGS @ 5.05% AS % OF P.V. REFUNDED INTEREST AS % OF P.V. REFUNDED DEBT SERVICE APPENDIX V SCHEDULE A 1990 1989 TOTAL 31980,000.00 860,000.00 41840,000.00 (47,760.00) (1.01320.00) (58,080.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 230,091.15 230,091.15 3, 932, 240.00 1, 079, 771.15 5, 012, 011.15 3, 888, 244.50 11070,148.97 4, 958, 393.47 42, 701.98 91250.30 51, 952.28 11065.56 371.88 11437.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 227.96 0.00 227.96 3, 932, 240.00 1, 079, 771.15 5, 012, 011.15 277,978.79 1.78, 707.00 15.25% 5.49% Prepared By: Springsted Incorporated (16--Jul-93 ) 212,905.10 69,382.54 17.67% 6.46% 490,883.89 248, 089.54 5.93% Page 19 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,,MINNESOTA , G.O. IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993C APPENDIX V SCHEDULE B PREPARED BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED: (19 -Jul -93) ALTERNATE A-T.I. APPLICATION Page 20 MONTH DAY YEAR DATED DATE 9 1 1993 1ST INTEREST 2 1 1994 DATE`: PRINCIPAL .; . RATE: INTERESTANNUAL P &:. L: P & I. 02/01/94 0 0.00 100,244.79 1009244.79 * 100,244.79 08/01/94 120, 293.75 120, 293.75 02/01/95 0 0.00 120j293.75 120, 293.75 * 240, 587.50 08/01/95 120, 293.75 120, 293.75 02/01/96 0 0.00 120, 293.75 120, 293.75 * * 240, 587.50 08/01/96 120, 293.75 120, 293.75 02/01/97 709000 3.90 120o293.75 190j293.75 * * 310, 587.50 08/01/97 118,928.75 1181928.75 ** 02/01/98 70,000 4.10 118,928.75 188,928.75 ** 3079857.50 08/01/98 117,493.75 1179493.75 ** 02/01/99 70,000 4.25 117,493.75 187,493.75 ** 304,987.50 08/01/99 116,006.25 1169006.25 02/01/2000 3057000 4.45 116,006.25 421,006.25 537,012.50 08/01/2000 109, 220.00 109j220.00 02/01/2001 3209000 4.60 1099220.00 429,220.00 5389440.00 08/01/2001 101, 860.00 101, 860.00 02/01/2002 3309000 4.70 101,860.00 431,860.00 533,720.00 08/01/2002 94,105.00 .949105.00 02/01/2003 335,000 4.75 94,105.00 429,105.00 523,210.00 08/01/2003 86,148.75 869148.75 02/01/2004 355,000 4.85 86,148.75 4419148.75 527,297.50 08/01/2004 779540-00 77, 540.00 02/01/2005 375,000 4.95 77,540.00 4529540.00 5309080.00 08/01/2005 681.258.75 68j258.75 02/01/2006 3859000 5.10 68, 258.75 453, 258.75 521, 517.50 08/01/2006 58,441.25 58,441.25 02/01/2007 410,000 5.15 58,441.25 468,441.25 526,882.50 08/01/2007 47,88375 47,883.75 02/01/2008 430,000 5.20 47,883.75 477,883.75 525,767.50 08/01/2008 369703.75 369703.75 02/01/2009 450,000 5.25 36,703.75 4869703.75 523,407.50 08/01/2009 24, 891.25 24, 891.25 .02/01/2010 480,000 5.30 249891.25 5049891.25 529,782.50 08/01/2010 12,171.25 129171.25 02/01/2011 455,000 5.35 129171.25 467,171.25 479,342.50 Totals 49840,000.00 0611312.29 71801,312.29 79801,312.29 (*) Fully Escrowed (**) Partially Escrowed PREPARED BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED: (19 -Jul -93) ALTERNATE A-T.I. APPLICATION Page 20 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $891909000 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1993B Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Clerk or her designee on Monday, August 30, 1993, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 4:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated. September 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on August 1 and February 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1994. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as requested by the purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable at the main corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by check or draft of the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1995 $940,000 2001 $175,000 2006 $390,000 2011 $630,000 1996 $380,000 2002 $305,000 2007 $420,000 2012 $320,000 1997 $400,000 2003 $335,000 2008 $450,000 2013 $350,000 1998 $370j000 2004 $345,000 2009 $545,000 2014 $385,000 1999 $ 30, 000 2005 $365,000 2010 $595,000 2015 $415,000 2000 $ 45,000 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2003, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Obligations due on or after February 1, 2004. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such order as the City shall determine and within a maturity by lot as selected by the registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge tax increment revenues from various tax increment districts within the City. The proceeds will be used to finance the construction of a community center. Page 21 TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $8,083,530 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $81,900, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P. M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 -of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of insurance shau be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. Page 22 CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify -for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal,. or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 250 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to theBonds agreesthereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated July 26, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk Page 23 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRIN6STED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF, PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $4,8401000* CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993C Proposals for the Certificates will be received by the City Clerk or her designee on Monday, August 30, 1993, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Certificates will be by the City Council at 4:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES The Certificates will be dated September 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1994. -Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Certificates will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as y requested b the purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will a be payable at the main corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Certificate will be payable by check or draft of the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the. books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The Certificates will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1997 $ 70,000 2001 $320,000 2005 $375,000 2009 $4509000 1998 $ 70,000 2002 $330,000 2006 $385,000 2010 $480,000 1999 $ 70,000 2003 $3352000 2007 $4109000 2011 $455,000 2000 $305,000 2004 $355,000 2008 $430,000 * The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be in a total amount not to exceed $200,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2003, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after February 1, 2004. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the City and in such order as the City shall determine and within a maturity by lot as selected by the registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. -SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Certificates will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge Page 24 special assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to refund the 1999 through 2010 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1990, dated December 1, 1990- and the 1996 through 2009 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1989, dated November 1, 1989. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $4,772,040 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Certificates. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $48,300, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond most identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. if the Certificates are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Certificates is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Certificates having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Certificates of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Certificates to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Certificates will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Certificates qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Certificates. Any increased costs of issuance of the Certificates resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Certificates from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Certificates have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Certificates. Page 25 REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Certificates qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such, numbers will be printed on the Certificates, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Certificate nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Certificates. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Certificates will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Certificates, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Certificates shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Certificates shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement. containing pertinent information relative to the Certificates, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Certificates, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Certificates, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Certificates to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded 190 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Certificates agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Certificates for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated July 26, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk Page 26 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO. NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON- THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $215,000 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 1993A Proposals for the Certificates will be received by the City Clerk or her designee on Monday, August 30, 1993, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Certificates will be by the City Council at 4:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES The Certificates will be dated September 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1994. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Certificates will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as requested by the purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable at the main corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Certificate will be payable by check or draft of the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The Certificates will mature August 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1994 $40,000 1995 $40,000 1996 $45j000 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION 1997 $45,000 1998 $45,000 The Certificates will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Certificates will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to purchase equipment for various City departments. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $213,680 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Certificates. Proposals shall be accompanied by a. Good Fath Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $2,150, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to Page 27 issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to'Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Certificates are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety. Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Certificates is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Certificates having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Certificates of the same maturityshall bear a single rate from the date of the Certificates to the date of maturity. No g conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Certificates will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating .to the receipt of proposals and award of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Certificates qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of the Certificates. Any increased costs of issuance of the Certificates resulting from such purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Certificates from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Certificates have been awarded to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Certificates. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Certificates ualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the • q • Certificate nor an error with Certificates, but nether the failure to print such numbers on any Certificate y respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Certificates. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. Page 28 SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Certificates will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Certificates, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Certificates shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Certificates shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Certificates, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the . Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Certificates, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Certificates, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Certificates to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded 10 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Certificates agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Certificates for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated July 26, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk Page 29 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: July 26, 199 3 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 26th day of July, 1993, beginning at o'clock .M. for the purpose in part of authorizing the competitive negotiated sale of the $215,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates, Series 1993A, of said City. The following Councilmembers were present: and the following were absent: Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $215,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1993A A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $215,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates, Series 1993A (the "Certificates") , to purchase equipment for various City departments; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul, Minnesota ("Springsted"), as its independent financial advisor for the Certificates and is therefore authorized to sell the Certificates by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9): 243765 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of. the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1: Authorization; Findings. The Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit bids for the competitive negotiated sale of the Certificates. 2. Meeting; Bid OpeningThe Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of considering sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of, the Certificates. The City Clerk, or her designee, shall open bids at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. Terms of Proposal. Certificates and the negotiation the "Terms of Proposal" attached approved and made a part hereof. The terms and conditions of the thereof are fully set forth in hereto as Exhibit A and hereby 4. Official Statement. In connection with said competitive -negotiated sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Certificates and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City-— upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the fn11owina Councilmembers voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 243765 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the City's $215,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates, Series 1993A. WITNESS my hand as such City Clerk and the seal of the City this 26th day of July, 1993. City Clerk (SEAL) 243765 3 EXHIBIT A THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF, PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $2159000 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEDNESS, SERIES 1993A Proposals for the Certificates will be received by the City Clerk or her designee on Monday, August 30, 1993, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Certificates will be by the City Council at 4:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES The Certificates will be dated September 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1994. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Certificates will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as Y requested b the purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will q bep ayable at the main corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Certificate will be payable by check or draft of the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The Certificates will mature August 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1994 $40,000 1995 $40,000 1996 $45,000 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION 1997 $45,000 1998 $45,000 The Certificates will not be subject to payment in advance of their respective stated maturity dates. SECURITY -AND PURPOSE The Certificates will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and credit andp ower to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. The proceeds will be used to purchase equipment for various City departments. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $213,680 and accrued interest on the total principal amount Of the Certificates. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit C De osif' in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount p } . of $2150 payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each ' ' p Y • e company licensed to proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insuranc p y issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to S rin sted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial p g Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Sure Bond. If the Certificates are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporate � din the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the • y e urchaser, the amount of which will Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the p , be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue 'to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. p p yivinproposals No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving unless the meetingof the Ci scheduled for award of the Certificates is adjourned, recessed, or continued � e i n integral ral to another date without award of the Certificates having been made. Rates shall b g multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Certificates of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Certificates to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Certificates will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost IC basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Certificates qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment q fy therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option p and expense of the purchaser of e Certificates. An increased costs of issuance of the Certificates resulting from such the y purchase of insurance shall be aid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested p p • and received a ratingon the Certificates from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. ' ' Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Certificates have been awarded to thep urchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Certificates. REGISTRAR g The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS Certificates qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the If the Ce q fy g es but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Certificate nor any error with Certificates, respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Certificates. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days followingthe date of their award, the Certificates will be delivered without cost to thep urchaser ata place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt b the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, � Y p o Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which pinion will be printed on the Certificates, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Certificates shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon' p Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Certificates shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City any for loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The Ci has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent � a near) final information relative to the Certificates, and said Official Statement will serve as nearly -final Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, Ci S any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, p rin gsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturitydates principal amounts and interest rates of the Certificates, together with any other ' p p �� with respect information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement of the City p • • q - awarding the Certificates to an to the Certificates, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 12. By a g Y underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the • y Certificates e awarded 10 copies senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates ar p of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded as its g g ur agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating g p p Underwriter. Any underwater delivering a proposal with respect to the Certificates agrees therebythat if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it p p ' ' shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Certificates for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official p p g p Statement. Dated July 26, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: July 26, 1993 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 26th day of July, 1993, beginning at o'clock _.Me for the purpose in part.of authorizing the competitive negotiated sale of the $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993B, of said City. The following Councilmembers were present: and the following were absent: Councilmember resolution and moved its adoption: introduced the following RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $8,190,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1993B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993E (the "Bonds"), to finance the construction of a community center; and Be WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul, Minnesota ("Springsted"),, as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is p therefore authorized to sell the Bonds by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9): 243768 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization: Findings. The Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit bids for the competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting: Bid Opening. The Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of considering sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The City Clerk, or her designee, shall open bids at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. Terms of Proposal. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the negotiation thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby approved and made a part hereof. 4. Official Statement. In connection with said competitive -negotiated sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds -and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Councilmembers voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 243768 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the City's $8,190,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1993B. WITNESS my hand as such City Clerk and the seal of the City this 26th day of July, 1993. City Clerk (SEAL) 243768 3 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF, PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $8,190,000 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1993B Proposals for the Bonds will be received by the City Clerk or her designee on Monday, August 30, 1993, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of SpringstedIncorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 4:30 P. M., Central Time, of the same day. DETAILS OF THE BONDS The Bonds will be dated September 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable August able on Au ust 1 and February 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1994. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months. The Bonds will be • • p reof, as requested b the issued in the denomination of $5,0.00 each, or in integral multiples the q y purchaser, and full registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be payable at the main p Y corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by check or draft of the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's address as it appears on the books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1995 $940,000 2001 $175,000 2006 $3909000 2011 $630, 000 1996 $380,000 2002 $305,000 2007 $4209000 2012 $3209000 1997 $400,000 2003 $335,000 2008 $4509000 2013 $350,000 1998 $370,000 2004 $345,000 2009 $5459000 2014 $385, 000 1999 $ 30,000 2005 $365,000 2010 $595, 000 2015 $415,000 2000 $ 45,000 OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The City may elect on February 1, 2003, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Obligations due on or after February 1, 2004. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of the Ci and in such order as the City shall determine and within a maturity by lot as p City selected by the registrar. All prepayments shall be at a pa price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and • g ' ' e Ci will pledge tax credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City p g increment revenues from various tax increment districts within the City. The proceeds will be used to finance the construction of a community center. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $8,083,530 and accrued. interest on the total principal amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in th • p e amount of $81,900, to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a payable ty . Financial Sure Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company Incensed to issue such a • � must be submitted to bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond rin sted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond Sp g p p � Financial must identifyeach underwriter whose- Deposit is guaranteed by such Financ Surety Bond. If the Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then thatpurchaser is S required to submit its Deposit to ringsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's q p p check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by at time the Financial Sure Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit that Surety re be requirement. The Ci deposit the check of the purchaser, the.amount of which will q � will de th p deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No fa p y p proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Bo adjourned, pro p• Bonds is adjourned recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/t00 or 1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity. No maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of ma. conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true rest cost(TIC)basis. The Ci 's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in ante City's accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. will reserve the right to:(i)waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of The City g, matters rBlatin to the recei t of ro osals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals g p p without -cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply p Y with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION e Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment If the q fjl therefor at the option of the underwater, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the y issuance of an such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of An increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of the Bonds. requested and received a Y the Cr has re ue insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if City q rating on the Bonds from a ratingagency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of themunicipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded. to the purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Bonds. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City g 1 will pay for the services of the registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, p 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding the Bonds to any underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to* which he Bonds are awarded 250 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda. described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement. Dated July 26, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HELD: July 26, 1993 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 26th day of July, 1993, beginning at o'clock _.M. for the purpose in part of authorizing the competitive negotiated sale of the $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C, of said City. The following Councilmembers were present: and the following were absent: Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $4,840,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993C A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore -determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 199 3 C (the "Bonds"), to refund the 1999 through 2010 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1990, dated December 1, 1990 and the 1996 through 2009 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1989, dated November 1, 1989; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Springsted Incorporated, in Saint Paul, Minnesota ("Springsted"),, as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to sell the Bonds by a competitive negotiated sale in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9): 243770 G 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The Council hereby authorizes Springsted to solicit bids for.the competitive negotiated sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting; Bid Opening. The Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms of Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A for the purpose of considering sealed bids for, and awarding the sale of, the Bonds. The City Clerk, or her designee, shall open bids at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. Terms of Pro osal. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the negotiation thereof are fully set forth in the "Terms of Proposal" attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby approved and made a part hereof. 4. Official Statement. In connection with said competitive ^negotiated sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Springsted and participate ate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was dui seconded by Councilmember and, after y � en thereon full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken , the following Councilmembers voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 243770 2 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes_ relate to the City's $4,840,000 General Obligation Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1993C. WITNESS my hand as such City Clerk and the seal of the City this 26th day of July, 1993. (SEAL) 243770 City Clerk 3 THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS: TERMS OF PROPOSAL $498409000* CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993C Proposals for the Certificates will be received by the City Clerk or her designee on Monday, August 30, 1993, until 11:00 A.M., Central Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the Certificates will be by the City Council at 4:30 P.M., Central Time, of the same day. DETAILS OF THE CERTIFICATES The Certificates will be dated September 1, 1993, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 1994. p • y - twelve 30 -da months. The Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360 day year of y Certificates will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof, as requested b the purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will q y be payable at the main corporate office of the registrar and interest on each Certificate will be payable va able b check or draft of the registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at the holder's i address as t appears on the books of the registrar as of the close of business on the 15th day of the immediately preceding month. The Certificates will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: 1997 $ 70,000 2001 $320,000 2005 $375,000 2009 $450,000 1998 $ 70,000 2002 $330,000 2006 $385,000 2010 $480,000 1999 $ 709000 2003 $335,000 2007 $410, 000 2011 $455,000 2000 $305,000 2004 $355,000 2008 $430,000 The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the • such increase or reduction will be in a total principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. An • y an of the maturities. In the amount not to exceed $200,000 and will be made �n multiples of $5,000 in y event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount taken will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced. OPTIONAL REDEMPTION The Ci may elect on Februaryl, 2003, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or � y tion of after February 1, 2004. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option the Ci and in such order as the City shall determine and within a maturity by lot as selected City by the registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. SECURITY AND PURPOSE The Certificates will beeneral obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith g g pledge and credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will p g special assessments against benefited properties. The proceeds will be used to refund the 1999 through 2010 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1990, dated December 1, 1990 and the 1996 through 2009 maturities of the City's General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1989, dated November 1, 1989. TYPE OF PROPOSALS Proposals shall be for not less than $4,772,040 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the Certificates. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ("Deposit") in the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $48,300, payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the Certificates are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement. The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by.the City. No proposal can be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the City scheduled for award of the Certificates is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date without award of the Certificates having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. Rates must be in ascending order. Certificates of the same maturity shall bear a single rate from the date of the Certificates to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be accepted. AWARD The Certificates will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in accordance with customary practice, will be controlling. The Ci will reserve the right to: (i) waive non -substantive informalities of any proposal or of City matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Certificates, (ii) reject all proposals without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein. BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION If the Certificates qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the issuance of an such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of • • y ' ' es resulting from such the Certificates. Any increased costs of issuance of the Certificat g purchase of insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a rating on the Certificates from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser. Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Certificates have been awarded to thep urchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on the Certificates. REGISTRAR The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will pay for the services of the registrar. CUSIP NUMBERS If the Certificates qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the • • •Certificate nor an error with Certificates, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any y respect thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the Certificates. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the purchaser. SETTLEMENT Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Certificates will be delivered without cost to thep urchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be Briggs subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of ggsand Morgan, Professional Association, of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be p tinted on the Certificates, and of customary closing papers, including a no -litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Certificates shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon, Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Certificates shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the Ci for an loss suffered b the City by reason of the purchaser's non-compliance with said � Y Y terms for payment. OFFICIAL STATEMENT The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent information relative to the Certificates, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any prospective ros ective p urchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (612) 223-3000. The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the maturity , datesprincipal amounts and interest rates of the Certificates, together with any other p p information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect • • q in the Certificates to an to the Certificates, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. By awarding Y underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the senior g manag in underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded 190 copies of the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Certificates are awarded as its g g ur agent for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating g p p Underwriter. Any underwater delivering a proposal with respect to the Certificates agrees therebythat if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it p p p shall enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Certificates for purposes of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official p p g p Statement. Dated July 26, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W. QUARNSTROM Mr. Michael McGuire City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, "•!IN 55109 Dear Mr. McGuire: BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224-3781 July 16, 1993 JUL FAX (612) 223-8419 Act l on by Council ,� Endorse Modified" Rejecter Date This is in response to your inquiry regarding possible approaches to analyze and resolve changing demands on the utilization of open space. It is my understanding that the City Council's concern revolves around possible future changes of open space. Those changes should have the input from the public. It appears that in order to accomplish the City Council's goals, balanced with changing circumstances, that the best approach would be a public hearing. The public hearing would allow debate among the Councilmembers and the public in order to balance the present and future needs for open space. The City, with each parcel obtained for open space, could record a resolution with the following language: "In the event that the City considers Parcel for a use other than open space, the City shall hold a public hearing and the City Council, after said public hearing, shall determine, by majority vote, whether said Parcel shall remain open space or be utilized or transferred according to the recommendations of the City staff." If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely yours, BANNIG &KELLY, P.A. atrick . K ly PJK:cge RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered the construction of a City -owned community center, Community Center Project, and has let a contract with Steininger Construction for the grading and soils corrections; and WHEREAS, the soils engineer has found unsuitable soils for safe and proper foundation and support for the building; and WHEREAS, the contract with Steininger Construction contains unit prices for removal/on-site disposal of poor soils (Unit Price #1) and the import of clean fill (Unit Price #4); and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Community Center Project Grading and Soils Corrections Change Order 1 to allow the recommended soils corrections. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in an amount not to exceed $100.,000. The contract is amended not exceed $224,000 per the following detail: Original Contract $124,000 Change Order 1 Not to exceed 100,000 Amended Contract Not to exceed $224,,000 AND, IN ADDITION, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that, on behalf of the City Council, the Change Order Review Committee is authorized to modify the existing amended contract by executing Change Order #2 which would modify the contract by an additional $50,000 in excess of Change Order 1 if necessary for the purpose of further soils correction. The contract could be amended not to exceed $274,000 per the following detail: Original Contract $124)000 Change Order 1 10%000 Change Order 2 Not to exceed 50,000 Amended Contract Not to exceed $274,000