The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991 10-14 City Council Packet/_1414L MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 14, 1991 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 91 -19 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Council /Manager Meeting of September 17, 1991 2. Council /Manager Meeting of September 18, 1991 3. Meeting No. 91 -18 (September 23, 1991) EA. PRESENTATION 1.Proclamation - RED RIBBON WEEK - October 20 -26 E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1.Approval of Claims 2.1991 Budget Adjustment: 2050 White Bear Avenue 3.Final Plat: Edgerton Pond 4.Final Plat: Kohlman Lake Overlook No. 2 5.SCORE Grant 6.Conditional Use Permit: 1201 Frost Avenue 7.Final Payment: 1991 Overlay Project 8.Budget Transfer: Environmental Health 9.Replacement of Assistant Finance Director 1O.Ambulance Bill: Application for Cancellation 11.Approval of Election Judges 12. Certification of Delinquent Sewer Bills G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:00 p.m.:Assessment Hearing - McKnight Road, Beaver Lake to Larpenteur - Project 81 -20 2.7:20 p.m.:Assessment Hearing - McKnight Road, Larpenteur to T.H.36, Project 87 -04 3.7:40 p.m.:Assessment Hearing - McKnight Road, Conway Ave. to Beaver Lake, Project 87 -05 4.8:00 p.m.: Assessment Hearing - Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87 -32 5.8:20 p.m.:HealthEas H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.Request for Stop Signs: McKnight and Holloway 2.Proposed Community Center Project 3. Informational Signs in City Parks J. NEW BUSINESS 1.Speed Limits - 11th and Gervais Avenues from Ariel to T.H.61 2.Easement Agreement - Project 89 -05 3.Lot Coverage Request: Ivy Ave. & Mayhill Road 4.Preliminary Plat Revisions & Time Extension: Hillwood Oaks No. 2 5.Infrared Photos of City 6.Preliminary Approval of 1991 Improvement Bonds and Capital Notes 7.User Fee Study 8.Sign Plan Review: Knowlan's Supermarkets, Inc., 2720 and 2730 Stillwater Road K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. N. ADJOURNMENT NOTE ATTORNEY /CLIENT MEETING IS REQUESTED IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THURSDAY PRE - AGENDA MEETING 5:30 P.M. .4D - / COUNCEIVIVLAkNAGER MEETIIVG OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CPI'Y OF MAPLEWOOD 7:00 a.m., Tuesday, September 17, 1991 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the City Maplewood Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 7:05 a.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Cuncil P erson Dale Carlson Present CounCilperson Fran Juker Present Councilperson George Rossbach Absent Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Others. Present: City Manager Michael McGuire C. CITY MANAGER'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION There was some discussion about the City Manager's performance review for the P eriod of May, 1990, through May, 1991. Mayor Bastian moved that the meeting be-recessed and that the City Council enter a Closed Session to discuss the Citv Manager's co m ensation. 1packa e. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Zappa and approved. pP pP Ayes: Bastian, Carlson, Juker, Zappa Absent: Rossbach Mr. McGuire left the meeting at 7:49 a.m. Mayor Bastian reconvened the meeting at 8:08 a.m. Councilperson Zappa moved that the City Manazer =s deferred compensation ,be increased from $350,00 1per month to $400.00 ver month. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and approved. Ayes: Bastian, Carlson, Juker, and Zappa Absent: Rossbach Councilperson Zappa moved that the Citv Managers car allowance be increased from $350.00 per month to $400.00 per month. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and approved. Ayes: Bastian, Carlson, Juker, and Zappa Absent Rossbach Councilperson Zappa moved that the City Manager's salary be increased from $76,,,003 per year to $78,283 per Rear. The motion was seconded by Ma: or Bastian and Y approved. Ayes: Bastian, Carlson, and Zappa Nays: Juker Absent: Rossbach D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 a.m. 4:00 p.m., `llTednesday, September 18, 1991 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council/Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Councilperson Dale Carlson Present Councilperson Fran Juker Absent Councilperson George Rossbach Present Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Ma g Lich Director of Parks & Recreation Robert Odegard Members of the Community Center Advisory Committee: Jim Malley, Marvin Marr, Don Wie g ert, Lori Tauer, and Tom G Becky Yanisch and Christine Haugen of Springsted, Inc. William Morris of Decision Resources, Inc. C. CONSULTANT'S PRESENTATION OF MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS 1. Overview Becky Yanisch presented a brief overview of the study. She stated that there were three major constraints for the project: 1) no architectural or engineering studies were available for the cost revenue projections; 2) the facilities which most resemble the proposed project are in their first year of operation and very little financial data is available; 3) and it has not been determined yet if the center is intended to be a break -even operation (Chaska) or a regular City provided service which demands a subsidy (Shoreview). 2. Survey of existing facilities and estimated demand Dr. Bill Morris provided a summary of the existing facilities that his organization contacted for general information about , ricin p g memberships, and activities. He also summarized the results of the 1989 community survey which identified what kinds of facilities the citizens desired /opposed and projected number of users. 3. Projected revenues and operating expenses Becky Yanisch reviewed the assumptions and techniques used to estimate the annual revenues and operating costs. 4. Break -even strategies Becky Yanisch provided five strategies that could be used to promote a financial situation in which the operation would not require a subsidy. They were: 1) an efficient building design; 2) organize acommunity -wide membership drive; 3) establish a community center volunteer program; 4) combine and coordinate the center with the current parks .& recreation programs budget; and 5) establish a user fee for meeting rooms and the theater. There was some discussion regarding the next steps after the September 30th public hearing. It was the consensus of the City Council that the ublic hearing next week p g will be cable cast on Channel 64. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:09 p.m. MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 23, 1991 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 91 -18 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:06 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 91 -17 (September 9, 1991) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No 91 -17 (September 9. 1991) as corrected: Page 4, H- 2, c. Correct motion to read: "review and rebid the project." Page 17, J -10, d. Correct amount to be: "up to $76,000 ". Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 2. Council /Manager Meeting of September 10, 1991 Councilmember Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all EA. PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation: Local Programming Week - October 6 - 12 a. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Proclamation and moved it adoption: LOCAL CABLE PROGRAMMING WEEK October 6 -12, 1991 WHEREAS, local cable programming brings our community's political, educational, cultural, sports, and special events to television; and WHEREAS, local cable programming is produced in conjunction with a variety of community groups, including District 622 School Board, AARP, and Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce; and 1 9 -23 -91 WHEREAS, 50 plus hours of local programming are cablecast each week; and WHEREAS, Cable TV North Central and Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission are making it possible for this community service to be brought to the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, 21,000 citizens in the City of Maplewood are served by Cable TV North Central and Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission; and WHEREAS, the partners in local programming are to be commended for their efforts to keep local citizens in the City of Maplewood informed, enlightened and entertained. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Gary W. Bastian, Mayor of the City of Maplewood, do hereby proclaim the week of October 6 -12, 1991, as LOCAL CABLE PROGRAMMING WEEK. AND, BE IT RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be transmitted to Cable TV North Central as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Maplewood to be affixed this 23rd day of September in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety -one. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: Hear K. VISITOR PRESENTATION after Approval of Agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all K. VISITOR PRESENTATION 1. Ted DuBois and Donald Young, Cottages of Maplewood, appeared before the Council, a. They talked about the difficulty with the snow plowing at Plaza 3000, and the difficulty of getting to the shopping area without walking in the street. b. They also asked whether it is necessary to have no- parking on both sides of interior streets within the complex. c. Council referred the questions to Community Development to investigate when the Conditional Use Permit for Plaza 3000 is due for review and to Public Safety to review the parking requirements. Mr. DuBois and Mr. Young are to leave their names and addresses with the City Clerk. 2 9 -23 -91 F. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 395,629.78 221.137.94 $ 616,767.72 PAYROLL: $ 189,270.03 $ 38.308.01 $ 227,578.04 $ 844.345.76 Checks #22895 - #22948 Dated 8 -30 -91 thru 9 -11 -91 Checks #14773- #14883 Dated 9 -23 -91 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks dated 9 -13 -91 Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Final Plat: Highwood Estates No. 2 Approved the final plat for Highwood Estates No. 2, a 54 -lot single dwelling subdivision south of Highwood Avenue at O'Day, McClelland and Ferndale Streets. 3. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1255 Cope Ave. (Northern Hydraulics) Reviewed and renewed for one year the Conditional Use Permit for Northern Hydraulics office /warehouse /showroom at 1255 Cope Avenue. 4. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1285 Cope Ave. (Englewood) Reviewed and renewed for one year the Conditional Use Permit for the commercial center at 1285 Cope Avenue. Councilmember Rossbach expressed concerns regarding parking. David L. Philips, Project Manager for BB &D Investments, will warn customers of the parking restrictions. 5. 1990/1991 City Manager Review Moved to J -6 3 9 -23 -91 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. (7:22 p.m.), Easement Vacation: Burke Ave. a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding vacation of an easement on Burke Avenue. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission recommendation. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 - 09 - 120 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Maplewood Engineering Department applied for the vacation of the following- described utility easements: A permanent easement over the South one -half of the vacated Burke Avenue adjacent to Lot 4 and over the West 15 feet of Lot 3, together with an easement over the North half of the South one -half of the vacated Burke Avenue adjacent to Lots 1 and 2 and East 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 24, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. A public utility easement over the South one -half of the vacated Burke Avenue adjacent to the East half of Lot 29 and all of Lot 30, Block 17, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. A public utility easement over the vacated Burke Avenue right - of -way accruing to and the Southerly 10 feet of Lots 16 through 21, and the Southerly 10 feet of the West half of Lot 22, Block 17, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows: 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this easement signed a petition for these vacations. 2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on September 3, 1991. They recommended that the City Council approve the vacations. 4 9 -23 -91 3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 23, 1991. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves these vacations, public interest in the property will go to the following properties: The North one -half of the vacated Burke Avenue and all of Block 17, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota (PIN 15- 29 -22- 21- 0084); and The South one -half of the vacated Burke Avenue accruing to and the North 94 feet of Lots 1 through 4, Block 24, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County, Minnesota (PIN 15- 29- 22 -21- 0092). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described easement vacations for the following reasons: I. It is in the public interest. 2. There is no need for these easements because the City acquired other easements to replace these. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 2. 7:10 p.m.(7:22 p.m.), Lot Division and Subdivision Code Variation: 1230 Sterling St. a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a lot division at 1230 Sterling Street. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission Recommendation. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following appeared: Tom Harrington, President of St. Paul Educational Foundation f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption 91 - 09 - 121 SUBDIVISION CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the St. Paul Educational Foundation applied for a variation from the subdivision code to split off a 180- by 200 -foot lot for the existing house. 5 9 -23 -91 WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: In Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, the South 74 feet of the North 1815 feet of the West 1/2 of the S.E. 1/4 and also, the South 825 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 (subject to roads and highways). This property is also known as 1230 Sterling Street South. WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires all lots to abut on a publicly dedicated and maintained street. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to create a lot abutting on public property that is not a dedicated and maintained street. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: I. The Planning Commission discussed this variation of September 3, 1991. They recommended that the City Council approve the variation. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 23, 1991. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variation for the following reasons: I. It is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Subdivision Code. 2. The proposed lots meet all City size standards. 3. The owners are not proposing any development. 4. Existing driveways provide access to the two proposed lots. This approval shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The owners placing a deed restriction on the northerly lot that would prohibit any additional building without getting City approval. 2. The owner deeding Outlot A of the Maplewood Highlands Addition and the west 33 feet of their property to the City. 3. The owner recording the deeds for the lot division within one year, unless the City approves a time extension. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 6 9 -23 -91 Councilmember Zappa moved to suspend the Rules of Procedure to hear Item G -4 at this time. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 4. 7:40 p.m. (8:05 p.m.), Intoxicating Liquor License: 1734 Adolphus, Scott Winer a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding an intoxicating liquor license for Scott Winer at Champps, 1734 Adolphus. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. d. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. e. Mayor Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 91 -09- 122 APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood on September 23, 1991, an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Scott Winer, doing business as Champps, 1734 Adolphus Street. The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinances. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 3. 7:30 p.m. (8:20 p.m.), Conditional Use Permit: Demont Ave. (Kavanagh) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a conditional use permit to allow John Kavanagh to build a single dwelling on an outlot that is not adjacent to a public street. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission Report. d. Councilmember Zappa stated his and his wife's home abuts the property being discussed and that he has received an opinion from the City Attorney that he can take action on this issue. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: John Daubney, Attorney representing John Kavanagh John Oswald, 1694 Demont 7 9 -23 -91 f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Rossbach Seconded by Councilmember Carlson h. i Councilmember Juker moved to second Councilmember Zappa's motion to table Ayes - all 4. Heard before Item G -3. 9:03 P.M. Mayor Bastian called for a 5- minute recess. 9:13 P.M. Mayor Bastian reconvened the meeting. H. AWARD OF BIDS None I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission Appointment a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Carlson moved to appoint Mr. Clifford McGinnis to the Ramsey /Washington Counties Suburban Cable Commission Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 2. Request for Temporary Signs: 2223 White Bear Ave. a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve a temporary 4' x 20' sign for 30 days Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers`-'- Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker 8 9 -23 -91 Mayor Bastian stated if the maker and seconder of the original motion would agree to add a condition "based on the foregoing findings, access to the subject property, if in Outlot A, shall be from Bittersweet and the driveway shall be constructed on the Southerly 112 of the undeveloped Demont Avenue ". 3. White Bear Avenue - Project 89 -12 a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to proceed without any more public testimony. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach Motion failed c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to open the meeting for 30 minutes of public testimony other than assessment Questions Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa d. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Cindy Sweeney, 1865 White Bear Avenue Rebecca Meyer, representing her parents of 1909 White Bear Avenue Delores Kaufman, 1717 White Bear Avenue Paul Kirkwald, Acting County Engineer e. Mayor Bastian closed the meeting to further public testimony. f. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91- 09 - 123 WHEREAS, Plans for Projects No. S.P. 62- 665 -31 and S.A.P. 62- 629 -06 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the reconstruction of County State Aid Highway No. 65 (White Bear Ave.) and County State Aid Highway 29 (North St. Paul Road) within the limits of the City as a Federal Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian g. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 9 9 -23 -91 91- 09 - 124 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of sanitary sewer and service replacement, water main and service extensions, storm sewers, signal systems and other work as part of cooperative agreements with Ramsey County for reconstruction of White Bear Avenue - Larpenteur to Frost, City Project 89 -12, a hearing on said improvement in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on August 26, 1991, and the Council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct sanitary sewer and service replacement, water main and service extensions, storm sewers, signal systems, and other work as part of cooperative agreements with Ramsey County for reconstruction of White Bear Avenue - Larpenteur to Frost, City Project 89 -12, as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the same to be made. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute Cooperative Agreements 91021, 91022, and 91023 with Ramsey County. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian h. Councilmember Rossbach moved approval of the following proiect financing: Estimated project cost $324,590 Proposed financing: Special assessments $ 25,825 Municipal state aid 76,180 Sanitary sewer fund 222.585 $324,590 The special assessments proposed are for commercial water service, one new residential service and three lead service replacements. (No sanitary sewer assessments are proposed.) Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa Councilmember Juker moved to waive the Rules of Procedure and extend the meeting past the deadline. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 10 9 -23 -91 J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request For No Parking on East Shore Drive a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 -09- 125 RESOLUTION BANNING PARKING WHEREAS, the parking of vehicles on the East side of East shore Drive between Larpenteur Avenue and 400 feet North is seen to cause loss of boulevard turf with resultant erosion, and WHEREAS, the erosion is detrimental to the water quality of adjacent Lake Phalen, and destruction of boulevard turf impairs the property value of the abutting properties, and WHEREAS, East Shore Drive is under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that Ramsey County is requested to evaluate and install no parking signs on the East side of East Shore Drive from Larpenteur to 400 feet North. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 2. Resident Request for Three -Way Stop - County Road C and Cypress a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Mr. Huot, 999 E. County Road C Theresa Huot, 988 E. County Road C c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer the reauest for ctnn zinnc a+ rm „ +" a�.A Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Zappa 3. Suburban Cable Commission (SCC) Office Space Lease: 1902 E. County Road B a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the office space lease for the Suburban Cable Commission. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker 11 9 -23 -91 4. Approval To Advertise For Bids: Emergency Preparedness a. Councilmember Zappa moved to annrove the cnarifira Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 5. Request to Add Approved and Budgeted Full -Time Police Officer and Part -Time Police Officer a. Councilmember Zappa Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 6. 1990/1991 City Manager Review (From F -5) a. Mayor Bastian presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian moved to approve the following changes in the Manager's Compensation effective May 1 1991: Deferred Compensation Increase from $350 /month to $400 /month Car /Expense Allowance Increase from $350 /month to $400 /month Salary Increase from $76,003 /year to $78,283/year Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. Galen Britz a. Mr. Britz spoke to the Council regarding a building permit which was held up y set -back ordinance change. b. Mr. Britz was informed of procedures. 2. Letter from Mrs. Ettl asking when her road will be done. a. The area is next on the contractor's list. L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS NONE 12 9 -23 -91 M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS Mayor Bastian nonrlinn li+in Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Mayor Bastian reconvened the regular meeting. N. ADJOURNMENT Regular Meeting was adjourned at 10:58 p.m. Ayes - all :J Lucil e E .Aurelius City Clerk 13 9 -23 -91 EA I CITY OF M"LEWOOD, .MINNESOTA PROCLAAL47TON WHEREAS, alcohol and other drug abuse has reached epidemic proportions in our nation, inflicting its pain, destruction, and death on all ages and economic groups; and WHEREAS, abusive use of chemicals is often the underlying cause of crime and violence, endangering citizens and diminishing the quality of community life; and WHEREAS, visible unified preventative efforts are needed to reduce the demand for drugs and to educate our young people for adrug -free future; and WHEREAS, THE PARTNERSHIP is sponsoring the FOURTH ANNUAL RED RIBBON CAMPAIGN October 20 -26, 1991 as part of a nationwide effort to show citizen commitment to drug -free communities; and WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, youth, senior citizens, and other individuals will demonstrate their commitment to drug -free, healthy lifestyles by displaying red ribbons during the week -long campaign; and WHEREAS, the community of Maplewood commits its resources to ensure the success of the Red Ribbon Campaign. NOW TITEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council and I, Gary W. Bastian, Mayor of the City of Maplewood, do hereby proclaim October 20 -26 as RED RIBBON WEEK and encourages its citizens to participate in drug awareness and prevention activities, making a visible statement that we are strongly committed to a drug -free community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood encourages all its citizens to pledge: ".Proud to be ... Drug Free ". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Maplewood to be affixed this 15th day of April in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety -one. MAYOR AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: October 4, 1991 .A otio n by; Cauncij : Indorse Ma di f i e d ,.,. ReJ eete Da*te It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 2 Checks # 22 703 thru # 24736 Dated 09 -12 -91 thru 09 -30 -91 $ 218,834.93 Checks # 14895 thru # 15072 Dated 10 -14 -91 $ 2 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL $ 190,367.66 Payroll Checks dated 09 -27 -91 $ 38,161.86 Payroll Deductions dated 09 -27 -91 $ 228,529.52 Total Payroll $ 2, 929, 718.05 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. tmc Attachments f' V U CHhE 7 1 ......_.._... ......._... _ „.t Y F 11 A P 1. E W C1 ID D Y LR /C:HrCK r Er,T;:t'ii*r _ _ PAt'E 1 �; PERIOD 09 l ul ;, # - VOUCHER/ r� C HE ` K ! _ .. __...._..._..._. VENDOR __ __._....._..... ___ _._._.. ____._ . _- _- .__._.._._..._._._ -- ----- r Ir!Llti} B. E R NU R i0ATE NA - - I T Ell �+ _ . _ 9 » � 414 t� 0 �_ 0`�/'' 4 /91 _.._ _.. ... .._ I� t IV1J '=' _ - �, T A 't t T R E !� L! i-t E h ta r`" { �- • l � N T _ A � tFt U MOUNT A. - L I C I: N' 5 1 rr ;- ::: 7 0 5 •• '=� � 1 15 � t,. 9 , ;:_ 4/ 9 1 W A L D ( C Y 1V ! I 1 ca L I CN ES n -1 9 14-1 .1 ,. h. b 1 -�. ........ ... . A E; 1. E:'. I '..� i4t�4f_ai► % ►;�/1�:;91 C OF DISTRICT C 1 '� r 1 ��► .. � Y U f y'950 661 Y5 _ ... _ 09 f �- - � - .HERN_ STA=t 5 pf W &R _ -UT L IT IE�. .�� . V JTI:L; i f IL1 i 1Lc ' i IL I f L!I ILIT 1 E �+4. ►�. i UTIL1 i IE — C i JTI:LI f T.�: :::, • . t t 7 7 q r 1 I f UTIL1 s lr::; LI T I L 1 I I L5 11:)•47 1t.►�.1 T s >+ s�! :951 7 7 03 10 ttiw_/ 1 :f 91 RUT �4 -GE --B AY----LAKE � +'�s) {�E T*RAVEL fRAIN'I N 6 1 f :► .,fit? 1 7 Q ,Ot t:► 7 0 R 0 [: MLLE SCH1 � � T �� -; r F }�� i:� r' L r� Y L t�� 1 !. ii :-� 16 9t;3 541 400 c :a' / 1::./91 MINN. S fA TE TREASL1It'ER U R VEH LU _ ♦« E w 1.! 954-- -54-1'400— 09/-12-/91 M I-N N , - ..r :r a f E T R - A 5 U R I� h - __ �. f .� .a i:. Ilk :E V E �! L I C:. _ ' - _ _ . _ :: 51 0 `;x /1 =1/91 VIAC•'LE LEAF OFFIC ; A- ;:,i1. C:C1NT cl�ACT Y K - - _ �:: N T R a. I F `Y fts • J 0 t,,1 L :: 2 958 19041.)0 • 09I 1 :�/ ::� 1 DEPT OF NATURAL i.l ' 'w SCtURSF S= h AL C w 7 ' �.! 1.d \\i�( } r N� 1.J f'1 � L � � - 1..�r 1'1 s.J f t:. 1:.:�'�17 19040cy 09/13/91 �' T . OF Nit �'URAL RES�:+UR':tL.5 CNI DRIVERS L 17 0 I' ;':5 :� a 1 f s_► 09/i-3/91 Iii I lid lei w ST ATE t}-- j R E A a U �y '' .. 7l T L. f` t 1 r, + y - j.� j .J A D R 1 Y ' E * 1\ S L i r Vr } '! w I: Irl w 29 5 9 5 4 J. 400 09 i 1 «_ / 9 1 MI NN. S TATE ' S .J R C. R l .t R . � V l'» iw.• ..� a l,t; 1•._ t / , t 1 1 1 F•, �l .. .. ♦ w 0 i.. r 9 6 t C.: t'» i. �/�� i „� 9 f d ], I '. { 1 1 U 1: L 1 C EMPLO P L t -t 51' E E '� 1 �:. r I; A ; } L� D 1 J I'•, 10 Iti - 10 ti! 1:; F ; ^,4 `4 �. 6 1 7 21 6 {_ ► o 0 9 / 1 6 /' I PS 't 11 A - T EE 1 ! t 9 6, 3 0:3 2 5 09/ 16/91- .. E A {:'j' s E TRAVEL _ - - T �t to r . I=� U l.. I }"t .t voucHnEa ozry or ��p�cwnoo p�a� 2' 1.0/04/91 11:14 - -- -� - ' -vouc*�n�o��cm��eazorE R ' ' ' - ' ' --�-- -' '---' --�------_------- FOR psm/oD 09 , ` ' ' ' -- -VOUCHER/ - ___ ,__ _ _ '_ __ __ ___�____ ____�________'___�___�_^ ^_~_____ _.__._^________________�_ |'| CHECK vEwooR C ou vEwooR zTEm z/E.m C Hsu K �^| wu�a�n wuma�� o^r� mxms o�sonzprzom xmoumT .�xmnumT C�. "^`,""°. id . "=.""=ID ==="^=°u ^ 1 T=^,°,ItIl t-' "= 0� |"/ - 1541400 TREAr%--F(JRf-:R MOTOR VEH 10 2965 09/16/91 MINN. STATE LIC 10,035.39 4-1 Z.'9 6 6 541400 09/16/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 660.00 660.0.0 FED INC. TAXES 1"16, L 1 077.6Z 1650610 09/16/91 COMMERCIAL RECOVERY Cl- CONTRACT PYM., 1 1 2 21 9 7 0 8 62-' 1 0 5 09/16/91 THE BANK OF' ST. PAUL WAGE DEDUCTION 43T.50 437050 Z2971 88018:1.50 09/16/91 TRW/RECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT SER CONTRACT PYM. I o o 10 woo �34 PLIES POSTAGE 5.16 SUPPLIES-EOUIP 2.76 M.AINT MAIERIALS 2.00 1 ,13 pl MISC COMMODITIES 1 50 TRAVEL TRAINING 8.90 TRAVEL TRAINING 2 . 251 PROGRAM SUPIFILIES 7 31 54 P,ROGRA.M SUPPLIES 1 : 9 TRAVEL. & TRAINING 6.9Z MISC. COt-111CIDI11"IES 14.90 rill TRAVEL TRAINING 2. 25 19Z.81 12-* 21.9 7 6 541400 09/17/91 MINN, STATE TREASURER LICENSE 9�867.1 6 9 867. 16 711 ' VOUCHR ` 010466 0 09/18/91 A A.T. T. C COMMUNICA11ONS T T EL E PH ONE 1 1 411 6Z FOR PER"10D 09 P LIJ C H E C: I.". VENDOR C. H E C. K VENDOR I I Ell 17 E. M CHECK N U M B. E R N U M It', E R DA TE NAME D E 11ij R I P If 1. 0 N AMOUNT AMOUNT 540060 LAND PURCHASE TELEPHONE 5 50.49 P U li 41111- 8 ' 010466 0 09/18/91 A A.T. T. C COMMUNICA11ONS T T EL E PH ONE 1 1 411 6Z P LIJ TELEPHONE 5 50.49 P U TELEPHONE 4 48 ELEPI TELEPHONE 2 28.07 TELEPHONE. 5 54.65 TELEPHONE 5 54 . 65 T L EpHowc --- _----'----'----- - -�---- - ---------' - ---'_--------'-TELapyewE., rE.'LEp*owE TELEPHONE �_�� _ ___ TELEpnoms 5 5t 4.9 TLi. L EpHow E 1 19.54 -----' ' - -' --' ' ' - ---- - - - - '— ---rELsp*ows - - ' ' --'f6.*4 ' `- - . ...... TELEpHowF 1 107.*7 rELEpHowE 8 8 .0 7 ' ---- ---- - ----- '—�-- - --------`----------- - --------T��P�om*--^--' - --^--- ' ' '- ---------��n7--_---- Gbi a* o o1ozr' 5 0 09/18/91 A A.T. T. o oonmuwIuATzowo r rE L EpxomE 3 3+.57 o o4 .5 7 ��*n u' u/�/��c' �uun/ cwnv oxzv�� zc ��o � . . . M [J� H - ._upae 541400 'w9/1-9/91 mzww. srA'ra /RsAsumEn +7.64. 0 0 i f! (� VOUr:HREG CITY O F' 11A Pt_.E. i:4 01-+ D - ' -• P AGE I r I 'H ER/ CHECK FOR PERI 09 _ ;I CHECK VEN C H E. t: V ENDOR ITEM C HEC K i 6 NU0 N�tM�:ER DA TE N�}:taiE DESCRIPTION - N AMO 1 �, f, - W - t. +,. . ` 1 ': / ': 1 IYI Iii T f E T E U F C� (► + c +. } ' • » , .. . _ .l -- -- _ _ i - - r - - (,! r.... .. .. ... .. .... .. .. .... f •; .. .... t_. ;�4„3 .... 5 41400 ,.........., .K ,.. ... .p, 9 . .. ... } i« 1 . �y( 'j' t y�� ... ST ! - �... 7 �... [ « .. ... ..... -.. ....... ....... .. ....... ... ... Mi.Niii a . S 1 ATE Tr�EAS� }��fl ..... ._y., .: ... .... t� �j �j' �w �.3� � i � y � C1a�J ...�..J..4 n _...._.. -.. _.__..._ ..._. - -- ....- _ _T_� . _ . ,t' ( 1905- ��._.. ,) ! . '`' 9 5 i'. 4 ` a 0 0 9 / i f 0 I "} 1 M INN. iJ t ." 1 -� 1 :. T F 4 �. ll + J CJ �. & i"l 1 `I (. + -� t.J R V E �`7 L .l C r 1 i +� 995. 4 } 1 13,995.01 i 1 ; 5' Z2992 31085,ta 09/20 /9 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE TRAVEL TRAINING. 55.00 55.00 lv i Nt1,Rt HEFt ST•A TE:S P +_+W(_R UTILIT UTILITIES 4 .13 •r 91 � 1,23 # - - - -... -- ---- - -.... - - -- — -- - "P 12,E LJTIL ITIES 6.99 ?26 .......... ........ UTILITIES; { -T It I .. ..�_..I: L . s ------ oll 31 UTILIf1ES 6.'-15 104 �, i r . 33 )' UTILITIES U T I L I T I E S _ .,,: 1 4rA 8 %; 1 134 �35 _ _ ..__ _. _� .. _�. _ ._ ..- _.-- -- - - -- - .,., ._....... _,.....,...._ ,...... w_ ..,...... ...................u.. w....�.........- ........W ...... ......._. .....w_. W.........W.- W...... W. W...... .............- w.,,._.........._ ......._..._. 1.f3� ��[ '.� '.'� •T 500010 / (� f { 0 9 F 2 0! 9 1 (y� Q� SIGN j�� t• 1 ! • L !\ S I G N S I G N SIGNALS �:. {.� i. r �y � �.. 6 1 r� �J �; 7 ,tQ 138 39 .., , - - - - .. � E" — . S:j 4:) �, .f �•� r. 3 0 2 •....., 5 r .••y �, , {r n � f r„t M ` �A� 11 �;. 2. 2. : .r 0 9/2 0 / • 1 GI BB MAR ti., E. F 8;4 r 1 ca r � 1� 3 4.4997 541400 0 9/ 23/ 91 M INN. S TREA M OTOR VEH i_ICw 11 29 .8 t 11 1 2' {: 9 ._• ■'�I �•�fi i 4,,1 n 3t - •r-- 'r' '.�/. 9 � - - - -- >,.. ,... r _ - -. - 5 _ . �: �, � 1 � ..} �i _. " �-J '# '- - - - � . � � ,.. � � "�. - r' - _ .. _ _ .. - _ ... �� I �� .. .� T � - f E. T F� E. A .� U R F h.. _ r' - ' - ' r ` - - - -- - -- - _... _ _ — _ �--�_ �. �- ... __ __ -- — — _- - - -- _ _ _- _ ._ _ __._ _ 14n ; 9 741700 ` "•ERVICE i • r 1 T1 0:=� /Z4 /91 RAM EY COUNTY FEES Ft�Ra� �'�ti.��t�� -- « A I X15:1 �I _� { 1 i .. } «} 1... -. `.. }'« 0 rw' .., �. 2« 0 1 L�. _.� _ .,;1 j/ - (s ,� 0 r 7 1._ 4 J . � 1 .� J T -1 yy�� F IN C . F r M. F Rf 1 T ! AL + .r• NE I N C. AWARDED �]] r• y r. �[ j j /j ]J+ � ... .... _.... .. .. ... ............�_..._,... C + w + 11 S " k R C Ottl •( ! lt1 1.• f S _. _........._. , . ^'......._......, _ ............. W._........,..........._,.....,..,......... 1 W_. �... w........ W_....-__........_...... .._......_- ............w....... .._... 1 tl, 15,) CONT PAY- C-ETAINAGE 9 17%, 175 -.._ __ ._. __.__...___. 4� - -.._- __.__ __. _.._.----•----------- 447 ...._— __._._._— 240725 ___- _____._. _._______ .._.._______.___ 09 E B PLANS D E.l "ACISIT W / ADEN -fS 500 .00 56 58 500.00 ,5n � E 4G 4.. 4 7 53 1 51 _ 0-91-2E41 M E :T R,0 W A S T F_ C C+ N fi R t 1 L C_ 11 M M J. S S' N . ,., A *w . ..P.A -Y A.B1..; E_ _ _.." ....._........ 2 4; A) N .,_ 1 _ 0._ _ ................_- ._..._._.__- _._ __ _.._.__.._.._ _ X160 47 SAC: R E T a I NER C-40.50- ; 80 9 .50 61 " 63 - - -- . _ . . . _ . 2 4 . 6 4 6-057 -0 , 1 5 / : 1 LEE COL L-1 NS # . . 3: M I t • E. D R-1-R- 8: . M-A L N T J t. C + i:a ..I f- ... �6; � RPR : MAIINT /EQUI P 32. :8 107.59 _..:....._ _ .... __...... _ . _..... :..... _.., ........ ........... rf3 4 7 07 3 1 0 ;, 5 c::1 0 2" 5 f'' 1 1 toO VI. R NME_NT TRAI S E R VICE. T : >'• TRAINING 25.00 2L5.00 , n 7 70 2 4708 _ ;-;10 � 1 �} )9 /::. 91 � - PHEE Ei ATE NE- t. ALL y I NC . r'"�u..�� F �- r3R . - - _ !+ __ _ - _ - - - -- �. -- ?., .1 4.4709 541400 09/Z5/91 MI�l��. T RE A S U R E R C f: H S f �� r ,� .� � , :� �� r • «� - y � y � Z 4 _ _ • ._ - E1 - 40 ..4716 500590 2!) 24717 721300 0 9 6 /9z o9/�*/9x MN puaLzc WORKS xosoozArzow pnoFssmzomAL pnocEea TRAVEL rnAzwxmo CopwrRAcTpvm. _ .. _ 40 21 30 170 58 !Jfj 40 FUEL OIL 13:1 24721 061100 09/26/91 BANNIGAN KELLY P.A. LAND PURCHASE 4351,000.00 4% 4A FUEL I)IL 97 IF5 54 FUEL OIL `34 3 9 ,"EL "^L �- °° PERIi--ID 09 FUEL OIL 54. 19 ___ FUEL OIL. 10.04 ',"=L "^` -_ ' =,~"8 FUEL OIL ~ zoz eT FUEL OIL 10+.02 -----------'--- '--------- ----------- ---- ------------ L L'---------------'-----------�a"e� F:uEL n 43 ' *9 Z4710 541.400 09/Z5/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER L ICENSE 64Z.50 642,50 . �us� oz� �oz z� , D FU L ozL ' �4o.00 |° n ---- ---- - ' - ------ - ' -- --'- —'FuEL-mz�` -- --- ^ ` ------'--�*n~n1 _* - ------- -------- FEES FOR SERVICE 64 7 0 Z-40 0 -d FEES FOR SERVICE 51 56,002.50 FE FO R SERVICE ._,_'~... ..,-..'.. 4 61-91, -Ci..,ERK OF- DIS TR ICT... COURT-, --CiNiTY -,I)RIVERS,- L IC'.--. '�� - ---��------� "� ----- � J ----�� ^�~ Z;' 4 7 1 66Z600 09/Z6/91 NORWEST INVESTMENTS SERVICES PRINCIPAL PAYME.-*NTS p* 5Z . .4 ..4716 500590 2!) 24717 721300 0 9 6 /9z o9/�*/9x MN puaLzc WORKS xosoozArzow pnoFssmzomAL pnocEea TRAVEL rnAzwxmo CopwrRAcTpvm. _ .. _ 40 21 30 170 58 !Jfj 40 FUEL OIL 13:1 24721 061100 09/26/91 BANNIGAN KELLY P.A. LAND PURCHASE 4351,000.00 4% 4A FUEL I)IL 97 IF5 54 C� �47 2o 350e75 0 9/2 7 1 HopFmxm conwsn OIL Fu�L. OIL 171.25 � FUEL OIL 170 58 !Jfj FUEL OIL 44-2. FUEL I)IL 97 IF5 54 FUEL OIL `34 3 9 ,"EL "^L �- °° FUEL OIL 54. 19 ___ FUEL OIL. 10.04 ',"=L "^` -_ ' =,~"8 FUEL OIL ~ zoz eT FUEL OIL 10+.02 -----------'--- '--------- ----------- ---- ------------ L L'---------------'-----------�a"e� F:uEL n 43 ' *9 FusL ozL. o7' .3 9 — - 'FUEL 'ozL `' �m.e4 -- . �us� oz� �oz z� , D FU L ozL ' �4o.00 |° n ---- ---- - ' - ------ - ' -- --'- —'FuEL-mz�` -- --- ^ ` ------'--�*n~n1 _* - ------- -------- N. r V OU C H REG C I T Y OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 6 19 C-HF R/CHE CK- RE61S-TER -4 10/04 1 1 -14 ii FOR [-ERIOD 09 3 CHECK VENDOR C:HL.�;�.1 wEf'J f'. : ��G:f� � ?�.l� �::H��::I:: 40 1 NUMBER NUM1�ER i�A T NA DE SC IF l ION AM AMOUNT FUEL OIL 66 .23' 10 FUEL OIL t } FUEL OIL 4t 3 51 FUEL OIL 110.92 a 17 ,I FUEL OIL 46.15 18 FUEL OIL ..1 L -- _._._ _ -- F U E L OIL 4 5 6.1 FUEL O IL 94 . 03 FUEL O IL 7 .09 ? �s 1 i FUEL OIL .107,48 W . - ..._..- -- -._. -- -. _ - '� FUEL OIL 50.':1 30! f - � FUEL OIL 30.95 � 31 - _- .--- _�____ -- 5 I'= LIEL O i6i ,27 as � n f FUEL OIL 26.85 +3 - - �._ t -- - �w....:._.. _.:_ .0 w _..:_...�.W_W.. �.._.._.w_.._:_ �_ _... _.:� _:`..__.�_�_ .._...- -.. - - - -- -- - - - - - . _ _. _ _ .... _. - F LI E _ I L - L �'t � 36 x 37 FUEL 0 1 L 108 .'2' 0 . 18 FUEL OIL 10 :3. RC. 6 39 _ - n -ao 1 FUEL .0 2 0 112 FUEL OIL 8 3.38 a 3 "s till a5 a i FUEL OIL 57.47 as � FUEL OIL 102. 47 r, ' - — -- ..._ _ .. _ - - -- - - - - -- - -� .. -- — - -- -- -. �. _ —_.— - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- y -- - `— --------------- -r'Y -- 4-x-4;}•— n i FUEL OIL `10 6 3 8 a G 09 /22'.T-/,-; 1.. -DEPT M:..OF N A T � � R A L: R E O � ! R S E S 1) Iii F ..,. L 1 C E N -S E pi ' : f F r �� C� _= 't i_i 1' .; 0 1.1 R ,_. E r I t [.. I C: �: !� �: 19 4.00 1 9 4 , 0 0 n 1 �► ,..472 w 1 ?C 4 „ _ 0 a /._ 7l .f 1 DE F=' F ILIA UR A.L RE. `� '`= ' 5; :3 247::. i 10 35 3 09/27/79 CANTERBURY DOWNS PROGRAMS Z18.(50 'i r . ,,. 60 W...... _ _ ... ....440. _.._...... 4 . 9 . .; 7. , ._....... .INN,- i .. S TA � TREASURER STA � SU��.��:�� .��7 ..��, - F� �_47�7 s SARTA;( R ETAI N ER 46 : - - -,5— Q, M- I t4 N -- _ S TA- E T Ft E A a U R [: R - - -- -._.. __. __... - . - _ M iii -1• V.UR-- - V E H - 4 r; ':5_ _ y 5-0 24729 541400 09/Z7/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 6:0.50 690.5t) t) 2 4 7 -' 7 e �� { „� 0 " PUB:; E !'St-'L OYE E PE DE I ON le(' 1 � P Crl�tn� I B - U . � I C -I 1 -; 1 66 . 1 1 c:. � � 0 , 96 ;1 , 4 � 1 8 6 10 5 0:�/ a 0/ j 1 THE E �: A iii K O i~ ,., T. 1' A► U L FICA P A l A 0 i._ E �.. X 685 _. 4 x.11 ”' FED I I C. '� ` A X RAY � s*.,: .. w FIG VOUC:HREG CITY OF 11AF'i. EK D rAGE 7 FOR PERIOD 09 3 tt . H /-- - - - - -- -- - -._ - 4 ( VE C. HC..C:1' V END OR T TE:M I T L. 11 C: HE C:r::: t; 6 NUM DER NUMBER DATE NA1t',E DE`,:;C::R 1i='f 10N AM0l,i AMOUNT 7 :X1.73;•' 541400 _09/30/Qt1 MINN. STAIE TREA URER LTi:E. 3E 16 16,814.51 , ,i - -- - - -- 7 -; ";_- - - -- 15-41-4 t� 3 - -- - -- 3 .;. } /..; �,..1 .. - -- - r I I► ,I. M __.. E -_ , .E-_...,:T- E A # `art L €: t lit ; E 7 - „ c rr 7 - - trO j i , ,1S ; 5 6 0 1 0 0 � a � ; : ; >;� / : � 1 MN S I A T E C O M 111 , ., 3 :t =J !N E. R , "� A "i E. INC 'i A �. r• A 'Y 8 , 8 . � "t' � .. , ._, . 7 7 12 lb 13 17 47:5 94 09/30/91 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE STATE INC TAX PAY 1 3 T 1 117.81 pis' I•i �i9� i , •' - ._ f " -': ' - - -_- " 3- .. .. • �. (� - }•� (�� ( �j �= - - - - y j j E --- -- �j J�� ` - �1C�. �} i �y - - -_ - - - -- ._- _ __.... - -- -- _ _ .- - _ _ _ �y }. _.� _ _ _. __ _ -_ ___�.__Y ,•� �} .f - _ IC I --_ - ""`_ �� •.! �'_ � ,I � �:. )� � �+ r �•.d �r � � l.7 � � � � 7.! _. _ A 1 � � 1 ! 7.�... - � � r f � l.f L. � 1'�f L - T i.. � J N6 I� I - .Lf � Lr f P'l � .r L. =�. r � t« r •� - i « � �:.. � ;, 1ti �1 1 ) 17 14 _ - ':: _�::_ 1_ AIR I CO NTR ACT � M. 1_ r .:_ ,� ! }) �) 11 {� }l it !`tiFtl�T L �'� Fi :; J�� _ -- - _.._.. -- - _ _..._ .... - ----- _ _ - ._ . .... ....... ._.._ _ _...._ ...._.. L.:0tMJ ilACT PYMr 19 a 39.38 1 61 rj--f E R- -C- + = }N S T R--e.- El-S- f_ 22 I'iti 14897 020835 10/14/ ALL ,STEEL SOCCER GOALS EQUIPMENT O •i ciEF, 1 4 6 .00 1 s r_= 2 00 24 u �� ' U 1 1_ 1 ;+ / 1 / '� A lYi I C: A . Ce ;[ }'�1 E E I fa T E 1 � O U _�. S I D E. E N G I N U E" R I N D �, 1 �.� . 3� t� �, 1 �� :� U U :! 1 27 ) - �- __� � '� #_jam _ ___ -/ 'fir} �"i# A - -. - - -N -E . R -. - _. _.� . �. - -- _ _ - .i'�.:ir - - -- _ - - -- - _ ._ -. - _- __ _ _ __- c ,. �_ » _ ` __ _ i i; 29r 4 '' �..) »._ ,,•, �• {"� t } B r of .1 � • J = h r .'• � � 33� 1It 30 1 + 0 U3 1 1 ANCH BLO t•Oi1 A1�1Y M N MA L:.h 177 . •�.» 177. -! l40 31 it 1 2 14 060450 10/14/91 B a K. M « MANAGMLNT CON �. r U i I DE. ENGINEERING 1 1i" c_ 4! 43 33 :i4 _____.— .t __'- �fi�� •.�"fl�f/�.f�JJ- : - .f'� 1_''�- `-.£:. H# �1�` �- �" t�- I-.. f__ I_- �'-' c•..__._..___......_._-..._ ._- ._...- .._- ._._.- ._.___._..._ _.....1...��. -_ 1 .:- .._._...._._.__._.- _»._..... .� �_' ,�. "34 10 -16 35 1490 0610( "_ "_10 10/14/91 BANIGE`, Ji:IHN PROGRAM SUPPLIES 5.00 35.00 4 36 Oft _....... _._. _�. - ,_ _ - .,._... _.. - _ - - - - - • _ __ _.. - - - _ . _ ... _.... ........... - ..... _.... ........ .._. 37 49, 149 06 15 1 00 10 B AT T ERY TI WA S UP PL IE S VE H.t LEL.E. Z1 1i01 aUPPLI ES•_�11_�;Iti1._E 4 i� 53 41 . 14905 070505 10/14/91 BE:LLO, LINDA REFUND-PROG �tE.6jST F ; E Z4.00 :::4.00 �s 42 ._ ...... . ........:...._ .. 14906 ca 7 1 �• ' � 10/ •�1 -_ _r� f ... ! . __.. _ p - . i �p •� � � • ;y .. hs � r{ _ d . J� 1:� U L: J 1 , i� G:1 �1 f V A G. }: _ 1 � !'t 1 : U ,€ � « RAT (. l Y i.. T �..� t� �« 4 • 0 0 2i �i5 u0 -4- lip n i 14�?0 � 071950 01 �'14/':�1 E:I� 14A.R E �:�U:IP �:tF It: w- 49 r r 5 =, « 95 i u:� =_r a.. •� f i 1 ;�t;�f� t� c:+ +.'s 1i.+/1M��/ =.,1 (� �� F Ni_�Ti��UFiAF'HY SUPPLIES (.. 14:x ri 1�'y �,�, •. ,. B w1 +.t ti: i a 3 r tit _ I () r r u _ _ , _ I 1 - 0 -,-- j t ,: I f 1 • / `� 1 L A C: 1'. ,.� }�} E _g t� tl .� L. -T f{ :4 ! 1`:1.. T F .,I .f H . 1'4! �., - .�, � « 4- � - ,�= tom: . � ` � 1 1 i � 0 9 s y c_� '10 1 4 9 : ! a i - i t ' i�= i :3 �� i:« ' `' J: L 3: '' t �= •� 1 4 4 1! Fi i F WA E �i l t�l f I ;� .., J: C , ;., lJ ._ t ,., « I. UT ILIT lE 1 1 1r;! ii IJI _ - 1 1 _ 81 1 1 _ N t. , J _ , iii rc G R M S U 1-'t' E..:I f: t }. ol I ►ice VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD P AGE ....__..._._._.__d.� }_� �y,� �.�;;� i ...___ 1 r �..'7.... _ eft" E!" u L f � {�'..'•�••_ _.__.._ .. ........... .. ....... ... .. . .._..__. _.....__ _ ___ _..__.._.... _.. _......... ._.._.. _..._. __....__ __._ ,. ...___ _ _ __..____ . ._ _ FO R F l E 7 R10D 09 I I• , ,! . U HER/ -, 11 E.i:K VENDOR CHECK VENDOR I T'El� C "� E. C: H E C: E_:: I r; NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME 1) ES C R I PT 1'. f) AM A M O UNT r, 14 9 1 3 0905r`:.5 0 1 / 14 /9 1 BE AD R I N i.• t RP M 1 1 • c� �1 r) i. .. ... ...., ... .. ... 1�#. 14 .., .>�. .,, " ... i� 1�._� {.� .. ........ " , ..- .. Lf f }1 /�.�'�0- f .... 3:�,;�'tt��a�fi��''-�.F -'� r. s . • �_ ............................... ............ ... ... _ ... .... r, ..>�:.• �.... . ......... . . . 14 91 5 1 { . } 1 400 1 0 / 1 4 / 9 1 LR IL Sij(U SMA L. I.. i OOR. S 18 .515 18 .55 I �ql ,r 14916 1 1 { " } 1 0 /1 4/5)l C PR ESS TRA T � �:�� a �.�� T,�:��"� � } .. » t� . ....... ...._... ,, — . -...__ #. 1 ,.. � _ . _...... y.. ._. �... / 1 '� � . �. _.....- ._ .....:... .- _. S .._. -.. s _ � A L � U !_ A T H t .. »: � I n 1 1 10.360 10/14/91 CAMVAS PRODUCTS S r CANVAS PRODUCTS � }Z p''f�; ., {_�..;. ,.! 2 . . I ?fl 1 49 1 9 11 0390 1 CA FtUD'OE:� S TA M P C SU PPLIES —O F F ICE 10. 1 o • { 3 f ' / . . f t C. _ 1N ............. .. _.._.__...- ..._..._.. w. C A E�' I T L S U r E� i:_ '�' . W.. C � 11 _ .. _:. — _.. jj �}•''�•'�`�. y} j ]�+� } }{�! L'' _ �_._.__ �.� i ,. • J. t... 1.� �w. M• •..�..- 1 { �T __�.__..__......._____._w..:., _.._.,,_..__..._.._ .... .:... ': :. - .�.i.,_� .. ..'.. ', ..�«..�._._ -�.c 15r•y�' 14921 110487 10/14/91 THE:.RL:.S E CAF'L%�iiN THAt!LL TRAINING 10.78 ! 71 1 rr.. 1 �:.{ i�..1 1 0 /1 A/91 CE:.LLULAR ONE TELE=PHEINE 215 , 84 , 8 149 1 0: -;Z 1 CELLULAR ONE TEL 868 TEL rT0-- .` i t;} 29.3 T ELE PH !„1NE 7 1. - a T EL EP H O NE 16 4 17,� 95 � tfil - -- ... - -- " -- -' f 14 925 "` � 1 •.� ' C 1 � 1 / 1 / 1 'mot C • H E " . i ,� E r . A E f:. H M AIN 7 E N A N C • E r . M A T E R I A L 1 r +a 7 1 ..:.� r •:, 7 1 492-:6 • 131100 10/14/91 C.HIPF'EWA SPRINGS CONTRACT i='YM» ST - 87 »94 I ��1 nn. FEES FOR S 2 5.45t f FEES F OR SERVI Z5.45 77 p - ; 5 14928 15t:} t if.;5 1 CO LE I B E' VEE'i!_Y PROGRAM RMC7 I::;T i" f =sib E�, A 1: 15 15.00 -1 ,. t 7 5 _... _._ .. E t / 1 f 1. _. {-: �! E.. �..t }� ,� - ELE C TRICAL -C: O N a•., -f - •1 l l �; --6 ( f r r' -' -- - --- )i I, 14930 150900 10/14/91 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPO OTHER CONSTRUCTION 5 5 1 3 2 3 , 1.931 15i - : , 5c.} 1 0 1 C:O } CORF"C".IRA " .t 1_!N EUi.lIP irFF.[CE c�;15 ti5 w 815 14 9 3 2 1 trZ- 1 0 � / 1 � f s �;1 1 - �� t_ H 1 T. E � E � 1 A L SAFETY E 0 U I r i+'... N I r_ 11 I F - j_t M S i 4 149 ... " _. - _ _ i :- E� -�. L .L . RE +. - I a.� N i - F 4.. ol I ►ice 1 V 0 u CH RE G C: ] •i Y 0 C= M A P t. C:. W 0 C1 PAGE 9 1 1 V OUC, t . l s' C�! 1. !'�. t-� 1. G !. E '` _. I FOR.PER �. 1� J C'H VEN C• V E ND , .IR ITEM IT EM CHECK I { UUtai ER iiiUfriBER DA TE NAt=lE DESCRIPTION A0 AMOUNT' 0 I 8 1 14934 15.::3 00 10/14/91 COPY DUPLICATING PROD. UUP1.:ICAT ING i::OS' 3 } 8 • -: 3. 0 ,, y 101 d 4 9 s 5v 1 5 ' % 7, .4 0 l I t. +t9 j 1 i.: f - FY - E Q LJ I P i' 1 E . I`i 1 .. 4 1 i1i 0 .: w +.! LJ PT--11 F i 3. -r U _E_ 27- i 1- •► 1 I 1 14936 1T05100 10/ 14/91 CUSTOM FIRE E!:tUIP_0T1HER ::.10 w0 810r00 1!� 1 1 � ��.� 7 1 8o �.)Lit } 1 / 1 4/ 1 1.! S�: D SPEEDOMETER R INC CONTRACT � T M w � 5 - �� j i f : ! t.+ r »+ 01 1 »I f � f L! A f 7 .. tf: A . 1 .. +: t A i C . J � }- .. .w,_. : P U - 1 5 1 5 is r +:. 1. - ..._. _ ._ - _ ..:.. F' L r. • 1 . 3 1 + { t� 14939 1 «, c_} 9 0 t_} 1 D A L. E lr , t- N T C � f N! R A C T !- Y M w 5 f 6 4 w 0 0 1$764.00 I. i ) � o; 1 �• �� 1 1 ,.:+ 1 �• � � ! 1 { } � 1 � / �• 1 : DAVIS DA . 0 S L� _ C: �; S ' �• � � ;� C.i i� r� �..1 t...� EQUIPM _ ... _ _ . ...... _ ............. ........ a i_: N - 1` Is� - L•'r ....._..... _ _..._' 149 _...._......_ 1 _ .. 10/ 14/X11 DEGE GARDEN CENTER SUPPLI f"_Q ! -' T r• . 1 1 `•942 2 0 D.0 C• _� A PHOi�E .. Up t" J t..1 E w.► EQ it . �•' 1 19 . : 39 1 1 9 r ; ;1 ` f. ' l 1 2 .3 t..} 1 EA,J y S r DI-_ Ca T r C• S U i - 'PL_.CE V 17.13 r i 1 ! r 1 - « ! 1 r . 14945 231475 10/ 14/ 91 ED j< S WOOD FRODU�:1 � O f HER Cr +NS3 RUG T f !.JN 11Z.50 11Z.50 - - -- - -.- .....---- as -1 r 6 .-- .._.._ -'i» 5, 7 -- --' 4-01-1-4-/-91 . . - -- .�+F. lY T - -- -_AP RA RA U i7 -Ml•�_I._1 - -_f w .._._ .0 IM i. _ _ �'A .i .._ A.. }. -.� .._. Y..�. ... .• 1.. .. - _._._.....- . ! ' t -.._..:.. _- _.._... _ _ _. _. __._._ _�:.4._ - .d..t_ _ .__. _... _.,_ .__ 'T '7 J _ . ,__....-- 4.4I �.:j_1- - �F "- { ':� 7 1 �• � �.,50� }`i0 10/ 1 4i 91 i_i El�{EBAK � Ni1T RUtom•T I'�l� CO i� A G T �= A Y i�� t�..�1 1 PAY ' E T AI1�tAG � �• �= �=� �= ..+1 5._�.. . r .10 _., 55••+ »0 1 -� 1 -� +- . {1 0 ,: { {� 14 948 2604 1 0 / 1 4 / 9 1 FAUS D AN 1 L C. k. H :[ C. U C.. ALLOWANCE �'1 . 7 '�; , tql ' j �' �� { %� ! f r A L« '4 R A I N I iii G 70.Z9 j q } • t hj 1'Fi A V � � ~� -� � - 1 - Pled -7i � w _ _ .. � _...__._ ..__.._.._._:-...__.._�..��._ ._ �a�.. _. ------__....,._. __._..____.._.___._.__._...____ w + +.. w.. r :� F•i _ 14949 Z-7 0 i,. 0 10/14/91 FL_A1Lw MA,.;'t C +_ +Rt i,;,iRAT 1:LIN +.lUC + LrIES VEl,I�':LrE 1 ,40 1 : 10.40 l 1 495 0 2 7 0 250 10/1 4/91 FLEET TE�.•H SERVICE CORP. REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 77.00 77 !r, 'Ib - _ _ .... _ _ .. •_ 1 �. 1 �.} 3- � /.. .1. •1 _ . : �»� ..0 ��} U C ' - _C� - .....S U � N' L. - {; { 1 r ... - __ _P_R_J �• ;' A _ _9, -U PPt I -S.. 0 -,4� b� l f11 1. `'i• 9 2 9 13 100 1 ,.} / 1 4 / r 1 RE1'ERG F , RONALD UN I F OR I :t 1.•L»�.�_ H 1 iV r:_ O r �} �� r:.�.} r 00 1� rill � 1 '19 5 3 1 i 1 0 /14/91 GEORGE t OD i SHOP REPAIR MA 1.NT VEHICLE "i w►:: + ✓ 45 i r ,X 1 1 -4 95.4 900 _.._. 1 /1_41.9.1......GL 1NGL.C:WOOD C f P= Yl+o._ 1. 'i•': �� 3 0 �:'=/ :: �i 10 C� Lr l: D I� E i� i �yI `r i R f:: r x �•� ►.. i:� ti, . r. � =1 8 6 ._ . I 4 0 1.4• 1 1 : °}30�.} 1lii'1.4 /:�1. .. hit t- x I 1 GOf.�DYEAR TIRC• COMPANY + ' � .. ,• � t ;• �i ! :Ct lei µ I ,�l "f F. �-� :i. +.• L. f. �, .5t. � j � - R t A IN T V E f 1 ;:L E 1 2_9'_:> R k.. ., r... r 9,2. m AW 'J V0UCH E» I TY +� +F M APLr�t�;(_ +i�+I� PAGE 10 � 10/ 04 .. / 9 1 11:14 V OU`Hf_'*R/CHE. - CK REGIS � CHECK VENDOR C:HE: i.l< VL:N ) +:iR ITEM J �.HE.Gf•.. !� NUM� EF; N�..lrf�: ��3� TE �Sip� ME I)w, CRIP 1 1.) N AMt; +UN�F AMOUNT 1 ; i REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE [REPAIR MA I! 1` VE1 CLE 9 .5 0 90-96 , I 4.:._. 4 3 5 .t: i. j f +• ��' t•f � F '••t � � C!�t � i 3 _ - - .. « l � t � 1 14 1 • + + �'t _ 7 r .. +i {�• G - , HE,. 1)I S F - ,.., At_. [ [_ •, J�� p � ri S ( tom• F`LE. F` +-+ �t E:. R ,/ICE« '{ •( l�.t _ + 11,864w ! ! f 11�8d'.4 • 64 �.�� ,I I �•1 . .'t�.. _ .3 2- r 7" �. ,...� � _ _ . _. _ 1-0-11 ... 9 / . 1 -- _ S « .. ._ � k A F I � .., H I k H �. ..., .. _ ._.... _ - .. . _. _ _ __ . _ -- . _ k � F` A � - - - MA �: N � V u L F . ._ _. _ f' I , •' ".. REPAI MA - ( V EHICLE 44 0 . 00 880 . 0 0 1 1 8 1 I I , _; .. 14959 .... ... !�.!� .'f.l .......... - r u.. f ? �.. �.� - .. .... .1 1 -,.. •. t DO .. . '� � i 1 !'l f - DA N � � 1... t.3 CO n ,.3 � C� t i._ � �� - r- 3 •� } L. J. � ;! •�. p �:...... _.. �.....,...�._...... ....•» ......................................... ..•....._...,.�....y........:.. ........ ..� 63.94 96.70 ... ..._._..__ ...... • ... .la �,._ / . _..__.... .. ....... ._ _..� � .1 S/ _. _ �,.S -.j."f 1�, y� •.,i. - .____. r L.. ✓ M 1w. ^___ �f ° 3_ -fe .t1 i S. / . -.i'� �. �._1 .....- ..._.. \«I 1 1 - i.• JL.• 4► i t...� w/ � L.+ �"M � .. .Ir. +.4 � J. � �i � S `! T � � 3.•. 1 a� � 1 1 � � - !"S i. �'1 �� -. - - -- I.� �.a!�� l + - i . � 19 .'�.._ (B fR 4 `` T .'r' 1t� R S .. . _/ Wt R ... j� 1 7 tf r f- - _ . �- - • �y'•�i t s- � }- {� -} rpry�, -'t�- N - ---. - --. - ---` --- 'r - -'- - -'- - -_.� �T• _- p .�. -7 - 5 fl! REPAIR MAI CC +UIP. 33 q ' 6. �.�i .L � � r"i ]• .•.r a,,. � ,� t «� !•�r •( _ .... � 1 {_j f 1 1 */�•°) -..jam A L E., �j �y(. t _ . ..... . ..... .._................ I _....... .. _.. _ ,...._._....... _ ....._._.__..... _._..._._. -- - ..__._. _ 29 14' '1 :* 3 0 1 �' 1 0 /1 4/` } HALE COMPANY INC:. FEES FOR ` ' 64. � � I ' 7 ' 14963 330400 10/14/91 .. HARridON GLASS REPAIR MAINT VEIA ICL>w 144 w '(5 y � .i. 44,o { 15 35 _•.. J IM I E R A E I fil _...... �. ~,. Rt t C t'Ml .. _.. W ............ ......... . .... ... ...�w..:. w .... ~ .. _ -.. ... .._...W.... W.. y .- Ct f t 1 1 401.10 1t /14/`-!1 HEJNY RIENTALS, INC +_ +UTSI * DF RENTAI_'-E +-..tUIt«' 60„00 6 0„00 38 39 an 14 9 6 6 35i•, } 1 14 91 HI RS HF- IEr.L.D S wU JA NI 1 0 R IA L 30.97" t S U P P L I E S J A N I i- O 1 �. A L 8-j !• . 9 i� [ 43 _ .........- ----- _ _ ._ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _ -. _. _ ... i `I! ' : 1 1 _ _ ��53 ..5 1 H OLI D A Y 4: OF FICE FUE +...+ 1 17'.50 �' 1 (, jt 1.49 40OF575 10/14/91 J.J. C:HARE.LS SON C +i.17 sIDE RE::NIAL-EQUIP 585.00 585.00 14969 4 . 14/ _ WP BUS _ _ . �..,�W -... 11 _ 1 4' ; 17 +I 400' 0 1 / 14 / c / 1 JEAN TH+- + T S °' FL.E:�. F = + - + It 3E: RV 1 c.•E:. 115 54 z( � , E EW w3� i« k �i ` ` � � 1' E. E S F H S E:. R V I CE 9 -$ :tee 8 0 {`i i 1 "I' 9 71 { 7 1 0 0 41- 1 . `i'..,/� ..1. ..........J F 1 }...� l i 1'� ..3 �..+ 19 1� T't f 5 { Y •._f 1.. LJ , .. ..... .. .... ....... ....... ...... ............ f v �.3 4.r !'; � - .. A L E ._ .... _ .._.. _ ...._......- ... _. . -.... ...... {,� � -... ... ........._..».- ,...._...._..... 1 3 ' _...-.-.._....._.....__.._..__._ __.._.._.- ._....._.,...,....._, CIO �r1 (il LEGAL ;> F I is (: A L .00 42, f; 63 I 1 1 10 / 1 J + i I N ;� + l# . + »+ l� f +.+ L �.3 �. { �1 �.r a �.i V �.« t� �:« }.w� .� !. f i' i F i �i „ p t« ti. - .A M w �'t• ^-- . __. it ' 14 4 10 42 0 10/14/91 KE::LLE.R ELE::CTfRIi: INC. KE+.t.t..ER E.LE:�CTkIf , INC 1 y 1.49.0�� • r; ! ......... _ _... N ' T J l 1' l F8 fig 3i FE FOR '; 6 i � 0 2 . 00 70 71 ` 1 . 41! }500 10/14/91 KkNl # A, jOHsN J. C_NtR _T PYMM _ 5 -3. 50._,o f� -.__ 73 149 4: 01/14/ F N +.1W FR+: + SU P P LIES AW R �, �!i�jU;.: hE i {: 1 .. E F t -F 1 1A i� 1.E W C1C2.D E 11 a 0 4 91 1 I 1 4- _....... V UC HL1-i /Er HECK ,tE_GI TER '. FOR PERIOD 09 2 la J-i t C H -E fC f __ __ -_ ( -_ _ _ ... __ -_ _ ... VENDO C:H =. ___ .._ .._ _..... _..._ ... _. _.__.._ VENDist _..__.._- - -.. -.._._ _ _ . _ _._ _........ _. _- ..._.. T E E.i ii I TEM C:HEC: {. }; NU N D lei }'M IC I: ;:; IP 1 1. N f'tMOtjN AMO h� j PROGRAM SIJPt`IL-x ES 9 • i11 � v, is PRO r = U • E q r 6.18 4 4 14976 430620 1 KOEG<:.L, R I kE.-HARD EE:(:• I"'ROc:ilAMS 15 , •.!0 15 .50 ,-ii I' � 5 i .} ._... _. ..�_j_1...�.1 4 � ;}. �.. _. _ �.� � :�s � � �� .. . D �. A tai N E -- R E f - U N D .•,. f . R � 17 � S T �'•' ]C .- ,.i I �1 • - �,� � � M �.� t. ^, 1 4 14 4 1 L .E. T .N. TR T .- r �:� 4 ,r.,00 . I ,;I 488 16 16 14979 14`x/7 j 450130 01/14/`.x1 L.T.G. POWER EQUIPMENT SUr'PL1E::;— VElciICLE 16:...44 162.44 9d 1 � i _.._.. .u. ��_ ..... .._ -. - (. ;,: .�...,,... 9 � 2 , 0,R ...REL+ AT 10NS A A:TES. I N FEE; �, FOR ;3E. RV .I CE. I , .,, � 6 . �:. •,, 1 -�� f 2.5 /•r'i �. «f 8 14r «�f • �'.�1 »..�.� � 10/14/ � � S � LAMfiMAh1 � ..,MERI =�Y w !tEFUNit i R REGI,.11 FE .�.s w V0 2V Rot) / i. 14 98' 46052:0 1U/14/w1 LEAGUE: �:1F MN CITIES ME:.11 .�ER.:rH.�F� 1 1, 7.:.•.+.x::4 1 7 4`5 . e".1- 4 31 24 .._•...... .�,,�, �...........,.1.��, /..I..,�t'_1'�. �•....,.,.,. _ L � F I • 4 W H U t1 A N k i fi f! T- S .. .,�: R A V ELL TR 1_s\i 1 N +a 14984 460700 .1.0/14/91 LENFER TRANSMISSIONS REPAIR MAINE VEHICLE. 778.75 778.75 i f� 136 z8 14985 470700 10/ 14/91 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEW RAE"`ER.S ME:ITSL:ER %ShIF' � ir,,00 16.00 �18 29 Spa �i r M 13 R• 3L, 1.4 � : 7 50 0010 °1.011,4/91 M & R SIGN PROGRAM SUPPLI #. 4�,��w9�� 40Z �=��;� }' I•'' 14988 r 00 0 ,c_ 5 1 14/ i� 1 M —R SIGN GO1'11-'ANY M R SIGN CO. 1 , •�`�9 r 6,. 1 , .i99 .68 alid „ Jbl 1, _ _1 9 I 00 480 _.. _._.1,0/ 14/91_._ _ - M. F_,._ FLE I,,tCHHACKER � �NG.w__ ... _- .._.__ __.._.._.�{ p�... FLEi.SGr1HAGK . INC 3 /1 31, J91 14' wt� r� 0 65 a� rte. 1C�/14/'.�1 {,j � « �fI RA. . AI TRAVEL & TRAINING 1NG 5 at 1 7 R� � 17�f�c.� 1 i 4 0, 1 4 9 1 5 0 4 I', 7 5 y j 1 t �/ 1 4 / '.•" 1 y� [[� M . R w P w A. L • I" t; A V E. L TRA � , 0 t ,;_, 0 x 0 r. i.. 0 q 0 0 i,ili 1 I 4 1 ..._ _ 1499 .:..... _..._.. .} 1t "� D'� _ ....__ . __ ..f... .. /..,� 1.._ _ ._ ..N -A �a 1,; :E C• H .�..... - R E t w H E 11 SUP ' t..1 E ...t .F F ..:E .0 k. 1 6L, q31 I _ f r PRO 2 4 0 " TR AVEL TR AI NI NG 1.5u 41;j Y Ir ( , 1.. A ,« I._ f# im /'t I C E '7 u w y � ,� 1 •. .r 14 9 50 15 . 6.-0 1��/14/;/1 MA1.E:.R ,.,T� W.AR1 L`: A �_sUT;. /IDE t.NGIN �-I.:��S y r 15 `.: 4.1 I 41f; FEES FOR SERVICE _ 1, u 4 _. _ 1 - _ _ 8 f�. =3_ I ;, 576wQ�� I I J .. 149 51 10 /14/ 9 1 14APLEWOOD TRAVEL, INC. TRAVEL TRAllt%IN+� 57,t., 00 - ..__.__..... _._ _.... _..... __.. _..._ _...- ...... _... _. _ 1 4995 ! 1 1 �; � +• 1 f !- � " • 0 ... 1, � f � � "+ 1 1 4 1 ...... - ....... .. ..._ ..... ... ..- .........._ .. .. ..._ .. _.. ....._.._... __ _......... .E ltd S 1..� � r_' rr "' MA 1 � 1 � � 1. + O ! � _. ...._. ...... _..._.__ .._ .. ....... ....... -. .. .. ...... .. _ ..... _ . ... ........... .. ... . . . .... _ . . t � — •' P ' ': '� `w " .''` � 1... C i.l 1'� � ! � O 1 ,.� t'� E:. t.� � •.1 f FEE •.1 ' ...._... ... ....__ - _ .. _........_..._._ ... ..._.... ... ......_ _. _�_........._.._. ....__ ..._..... �i �i � �� (,1 ._......_.........___._..,.., rr �' � r \.� { y � ff �• 1 . 1 4 � 1 � = t , '"_'t , l 11.1 t) t_? 1 t„1 / 1 4 / 91 �, q - 14 C G U I R E , i't I i � �s E'. L r T 1 t ' V E L I C A 3. N t � ; { j, � r ��t �r, �.. 5 . 49 .. ...... .. ., _. .. , , :,� J ALLOiiiJ'1.IVi. L. V EHICLE �� ,: 50 r 00 1 g ,".3 a 49 I `} 'i 149./7 .,0 ,1c� 1 14/9:1 .MENA{"tD, INC.. �. + +.t 1 n 4 8 4 4 !0U LC' H RI'. i CITY OF MAPI. EWOO l? PAGE 1 �i t i 1f »� ff l 1 i1 1 VrfUc.HLR/CHECK RE{ -ISTE - , FOR PERIOD 09 3i .t I 1 �_�U;:H/ _ .. ... . _... _...... _._ ... ...............___...__......_. .. __....._.. ....._. _... 1( CHECK VENDOR C:HF: C•K VEN ITEM ITEM C :H>~is K 6 NUMBER NUMY -,ER DATE NAME DE; i R 1PT ION O � A r� . E: � T ��s A M OUNT 7 1, 53 0 6 560 10/14/ MERIT CHE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 43. 51 I 1f 1 1111 ,. . ...... :. .. 1 f .. . "... .. .. .... .. .. L ! 1 `t � � 1 . . �j . ... AREA (� jys A � f � . ! ...... /� �» �ir i'i E r i i .. A t z. G A M A i ti� A �•"S. E I { f . N T Pt a.7 �.! �. ...... .........._..... ............. .. �j . t .. •�i . . ..+ ........_. ',' �j .. ....... i�.. i N T 1 � l� Y � L. j�:: � 13 +� � �1 J. IZI � _... _ ...._ .._ .... _.. !� - - - - ._.. -�-' � t J -� — - - ._.. _. ._ ..,...._ _ .. .. _. _. .._ .._. ... � t�} . _. ._ 1 _ 0 1_ 0 - _.. -..... 1 't t, i C i j ( j r tai � 1 5j 13 t� 531300 01/14/ ME 1 lyi ; :� I-' C T I �_� I`l SERVI FEES F ER Y SERVICE 31 4 25 . 6 0 r) •3 1 `i 25 .60 - - -1 t 6 I o il t i � 1 500 1 5 4�.A335 :» 1 t'•+ !'� . r• MIDWES LANDSCA ��--• COMMODITIES IY� J. +3 �:s w 160 R �„} �? hi � »�� 4 �_� {�Z 1i I 19 r t r .1 u 0 4 _.._.... -M I N E S 0 -� - C' i s A Y F I E �' _. .:. i..I l"t ff .� i, :. u W .W __ _ W. 1 0 l ip 15003 551400 10/14/91 MN /WISC PLAYGROUND MN /WISC PLAYGROUND 959 .00 in I� MN /W I SC PLA i GRO0ND . [ 1'.i .60 t;' 636 w 60 26� I _ ... -. ....- .....:_.1- 5.0- 04.....v ....._. 6 5 0 ........ 5-T A T E Le A'k A S S CI C 'A T1 i 1 It � _ � . p _� . _. __.�_.�_ _ r �� .. _ f �.�. } " y � � 23 i 1 15��" 5 5 60 4 50 10/1 MM S TATE SHER A E.. K S, 60.00 60.00 31 i 12.4 ?, ? t, 150 55 7t�050 10/1 4/91 MOBILE EM�.RGLNCY SYST EMS, INC. RPR � MAI!�lT /1fEHICLE _ 90w0t"j 33 :�a REPAIR MAI VEHICL 59 7 w 00 1187 35 ?8 1Fc_�07 570 1 M 0 G E'EN �� I� I� 1 MATE 4 i� w 00 36 37 3a � 30 MAINTENA MAIERIAl. x;7,51 39 fy T �y ] �j ] M A 1 N T - - M A 1. R 7. A L_ . _ 1 1 -8 - G ' - - - - - -- - 11-AINT MATERIAL IZZ.40., 401.16, 42 I 4 t 5 1 # - }t} t'�' #:!._rte {}_:.__:__._....�_y.. • i f- ...__:. »� {��it {��.:�i s ...i r..:_ r _ -; =;'i.p E� {._ 4 3 ,,l 134 n5 I x#71 3(; 3 7 { t . , - 4s 49 :tR 50 1 5 01 0 ICS 0 0 2 0 10 NA I A FE ; — C0N SUL.T I N 1 9 200 .0 0 1 , 2 „0 .511 r M 4 1 _i i � 15.11 / -, {_� tl i � 1 c" � 10/14/`” 1 Iii ■Y.S.0 . TRA �# 's! E L �� E A �: i�; �: t� t ' 0 .� t w .� 150 1 50 . 0 0 r 1 ,, li 5 .- __.__.._._._.._._._ -.__. +} �i�,/ } . .._.- J. i LJ .1.. W __.. -__ -.� }'p !.'_...- _..- 1 •r• «• 1... •.moi .�_..._ ,. } t --- l r i...___- .... -._. � - ,»y +�j }��.•r� • }� }} �•. _... ..__....____.___..-...-_._...._...-._.-. I '� H. I ! ._... _ - . y;`..y._. _._ _ __...- ._.- -.._.__.._._�._._.._. r }y� y } ' . - �� 4 c � =i t }+ . }}+.. }•. f.- __- ..._.- ...,.. -. _. _.. .. __._- ...- .- _._._.- _.._.___._ _-._.-.-_._.- .....r_...- .__.-- .....�.�.._ -.. ! ■•� 4� - 7 1 f 1 ._._.._. I . -! '.- Tw. __. - , f�6 f�! Q .t 4d I A wl H .it �./ 1 J. .•. �5 0 . ~~ r t5 46 q .� _ ]. � � � •'�' y t ..:. �... _.. i�t .� L#' � T •! ...... ..... :.. .. { .._.:........ � �7 T � � F w 1 .� ....... ,....... ..... �- Nj -- 1 V A � .L �� F 9 A L.. F .l I� � f f[ E � � �. � -' 1 '�' {� F�F 1 ., 7 ,. ` E ...... ..........:.p.. ........ .. ..............._..._ ..................._.. _......_..._........_._......_. A � ,:? I�'•i w F _ �.��.. �:., .. �..�.�l.L... €� .,�'_.L. L �• 1 ....�,� ti;�i... * ...�1. �"'� .. _...�.�• M -- i;1..�^��""" 6Q 61 ' 47 67_ 1 50 1 4 6 40550 1 0/14/91 NELSI) iii, JNtaiN VEHICLE ALLOWANwE 63 c <1.) V � � .[ �• L � A L i. � � �� iY �.• �. i Mi "7 R"i _" � f' r t..f S. 64 (i5 S1, ^, 1-� 1 IMAINT 66 I`it 1 5 01 5 6 4 0 �f05 10/14/91 r NELSONS AUTO SERVICE S ERVICE , REPAI VEi1Iw1..E 108.10 7 61 r 5,1 ....................... ... ............. . EPA. I- R:.... E_.. _.._.. ........_........_............_ » 68 ro � 5,1 1 6 4 #_� 8 0 10/1 N E 14 M A N SI N E ��;1' t A N SIGNS 5 1:,1 w r 0 521 .70 1. 6 10 /14 / 91 HO H S'. PAU C IT Y O F UT I LIT I E S 1 r5; 7.1 7 7j r j UTILITIES 128.10 '1 i ......... ... . ...... . .... . .....�..... _ U T T - I .:I...1. E:� - ......:.........�.�.... .......:............. �....._ _.... -... _ ...._. _.... , 1 _� -i � M � �:,1 ......... _ _ .__ ......... __ ..._...._.... 1 � • _ - ._..1 g _ .,,�, ...� ■ _ ^ _....v._.,..._, 76 f II i f V i.+ U C r fi=t E G CITY �� F rl A P L i:: !z c.:+ O D PAGE I f .ter/ , . 1 ...._._. _. __... fi ;_f : - H L ht H �. CK R EGI S T E R FFDR PERIOD 09 J 4 CHECK VEN C•HE CK VEN1)1)R 1 �fL11 1 l Ell C. -[ t) 5 NUMBER NUl ii: tF� DA TE NAIVE _ D �. ;.l R I t=•' '!` 10 ! N Ft M i � U N T AMOUNT ' 1�t�1�_; . � _ -� �,60 "• � .7� .� � 1�r1�r, �� "c . ST. PAUL M R O T A R Y MEMBERS � 0 0 . 00 is 1 � ti4 9 lu .-0-9 t f r _t 1 r� / 1 t :t t ± �t H 23 f A Fi : i i' C t >w T E f .tit H A l� �t 'I A t�fi L t� A t A >:: t A► L ._, �. „ . 1 • .: 6 f 50 6 0 9 0 1 NO H S TAR WIPE IN - ( RIA1... SU r-'r'LIE Sa JANIT !_1R ., 1'. �0 7 ' 5 1 90 . 75 t - 1��:�1 c 6611 l - .. i} ........ _ . 10/14/91 I HC TAR TURF, INC. MATERIAL MAINTE tai 1451 « 00 145.00 tt�� N 1i} O R R fir} t•t _+.�. tai A - :� f #� 'fi f E ,. #:i .� f°t - -- - . _ t �.... � . __ �. I`, � ` " FO R '� 00 iii 0t 5p 81 _ 15 0 ' 2 7' 3 6'.� a ` t�? !) 1� i) 1 I�I L I 1 U V H L �. H s P A T FEE R SJECi i3._ tn . .. _. _. -.. . _..__ -- - _._ _.....__ _._ . 15024 - ._..._.... _.. - ...._ 680600. _......... 10 /14/91 OCTOPUS CAR WASH .. _ _ __ - - - .- _ _ - RE .-.PA.[R MAIN VEHIC:L(. - - -.. _._....__ ..- ...... _ _ - - - - - .. -_ _ _ __.- - _... 187.50 I ' E'1E MAI V 6 7 «5 )1 ,:75• 2 REPAIR r' AI N T VEI-41C.. 7. 23 RE PAI R MA VEH:.CL 7.50 ';3t� 24 _._ _..... —. _.....___.._... -..... _ _._ -._ __..._....._ _._.. .. _..n...... �............... .__ ..............._ .m- .._..._..,............. _..... . � E . t .,, A . I E t� � ,. 1 l�l , t -._.� � I~ E tw 1. . - - _. _ .. . � _._... -_ - i' 2; REPAIR M f V EHI C LE 7. 341 z7, REPAIR MA INT VEH C LE 7 .5 :. 307.50 0 �.. I 11 150,:.5 701 1 („) /14/91 PA - f.1 1 3 TOW S T « PAUL. C +_N 1 RAC• T PYlyi. 40.00 40. - 00 138 i 139 30 1 0 Z jam, ,_ , -.. -_ t . +.. » i. � ..:...._. .. # -� 1 -4 / -91 . .. .. i! L.. ; _. JUD .. _. { ..E 1 »� \f I CE - - - 4 w fJ 0 ' �„ ._ t — 140 �.a, 31 3a 1 7 7106 01 PE R SONNEL DECISIONS, I NC . FEES F*OR SERVICE 120. 00 120.00 4 4 34 7 1 5 1 _, 0 71i�1;00 10/ 14/91 PET CONNECTION PROGRAM SUPPLIES _ « 14 _. Zt} «7..t 46 h 4; _.. 1- 4 1 . _ P H Of 1) S F 0 G 0 _ _ - - P H 0 t 0 4d 3 CONT 4 .1Z "U 1 3J I I S UPPLIES 0FF 1C:E t•.�a� I ;>> 31 _ >E S . ♦ SUPPLIES-OFFICE 6 .38: 53.46 1+161 'I PRECI .i" t.:� H !�' M wt _. _ ._... ..... .._ ..... -, .. .. .. .. ..._. .. ........... .. _ S - U F S O }" 1' -1 -C E ... _..,.. _... .. .. -... .. :..... _. .. - -... .. .._... ... _.. ... ... ....... .... _ . « :: _ ... ... - •.a . `. �. + .._ .. �vl i 1 r ai0,' 1 7 4 1330 1 R C DATA PR S C A F I S LE l A 25.58 25 I � .t 4GI 4r FISCA 1 2 .7 1 63 �`j LEGAL L: FI 10..:.. 6 d t3 _..... LEGAL FIS' _ . ,... . ,t;4 f i LEGAL ;: FISCAL LEGAL a FISCAL 8 «751 1 5 66; 66 1 • . 4R A I :NI j J I I 1 1.5032 741555 10/14 RA C0liN Y FTAC" T NC; ::�Era. � - • ' ::a! 4 • t. - � i 15033 7�•a.:.1'10 10 /14/91 RAMSEY EMEP� t+;E llIC:AL '�EFii,'l:f �� SUPPLIES i l::ti•11:f= h NT _ _ _ _ _ L I E S E J� �... i.... .. .._...._...__._... ._. .. _ _ ._.. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. _ .. .. 1 1 P �'s E L •� R Al N N G __ . ... .. .. ...... _..... .. .__. �t .- ( �� _... _._ _ .... -. i. r 5 1. _ .. -�;t __.__. � 3 3 `l w�� -� - ..... Fl 1 VOuC:HRE: C: I _( Y OF IIAPt..E:WOOD PAGE 14 �3 1 -0 /0 /f ._.....1 1 n 14 VOUCHER/ C HECK ._REf TS ! ER-..._- FOR PE RI O D I O D t_1 I I r 31 �I V O U C : H E R / I CHECK VENDOR C:HE.:::1 =:: VEN I TE.11 1TE.14 CHEC:k:: i NUM N IS. ER DA T E NA DE SCR I P T I ON N , O AMOU .tJ��T - ��1�l�t�1�1T 7 I 1 , 0 34 75�j':�0tY 10�'14/':�1. RE:N" ALL MINNESOTA OUISIDE RENTAL 1 ='1 .0'� -' � _1 1 �. 1. G -� 1 �n► .L .1. -t5 75 - _ 1t� �'� � / . RIEKE w ARROLL: i��...s�._1_.ER A'�", irefC: n .:....__............. C1C1 I..DE.. _ EN�'7 . :IH . � ER ..: � 1�1� � �r, �r� f . � �� _ - - _ . � -� !x �._ _.:._. 15 O'S 6 761 05 10/1 4/91 RO2.C:.RTS j KEN VEHICLE A!..LOWANCE. 1.56 trj Lr __ __. ___.`__- _. - _ ..- _.._._.. ,,... - �:.. -_... - _ , i 181 1 503 T T61 490 1 R }IN OTTO kON OTT+ INSTALLCR 19 - 1 i I _......... _ ... _ .._ . . .................... ........_.......__._.. _._............_ - - - - -. _... -_ - -- _.- -- -- ._ .._ .........._......... _. _ ........ _..._. .. _ . ...._..... _.. �..- --_.._.....::._.......� t..11�! ;_.. � -�.•�• �..�r � .�:.ItI. �� [ A � t.. l'.�L -- - - •- -_ .- -- - --- - - -- �.- - - -- - ---- __�,.....�.�_._.�.., ....._�. __ �,...._ ___'�� ,� . � i_3 ,........... -- ,...- ...,.___W,..�- ...,_. W.._.........1 ..,.. _,i 1.!f f 1 '" 7 7 �_�....t '�' _ 1 0/14/ 91 h U F F 1 1l E � J 1 1�� SO N 0 O t �. ,�. S LIES- vE{ - E 1 08 {1 ; . 1 , � .1i z. 26 1 �.1:w 9 770900 10/14/91 F� ` # T C� r T i'i EEC RANw► -Ft A I_N ��i c t _1.TSIDE RENTAL E..�_IF 135.0t.� �•.�•_ { 27 I . �. .... _... W:._.�..... _.__.__...__....._. ----------- ..... ...... _ _. ... _ . -. _, _. ...... ....... _.. . _. . ■�.1t:1 15040 780300 10 114 1 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC:. SU,=1~'LIES 0FFICF. 36.2 24 30 31 32 f - -- 17�r� - / .. ....... .._ _..._ 1 5042 _._.. _ _....._ ... __.__. 790143 _ -- _ . - - ... S CHMIT , JEAN - -- - _... -. _ .: . __.. _ 'PROGRAM REG TItwo1*t -... - - - -- - - -� ....._... _ ._ ........... L4.0U ......., ..... _............- �.._ ., ..., . _ �Y......_ Z4 »00 W W 35 150 1 i } 14/9 1 SEARS ..► S MALL T f f i�� I_ ,., �i i 1 . . j $ W. _ _ Fit) „ :� +'� '18 � "} 40. 1 _._. fr -� yf� .. 1 .. �. 4 l" { ?.. , .1T 7 f {{ - 1K [Jc+� T k - 7/ __ _ ._ -....- _. - - --... _.- --- 1. i ! �I MJ i.f i.• - - ` [pg7} ,L'.•' - T�+� j� - _ ----- '- ---'- ---- ,../ .L W t f _ ,..f 1.f �l 1 ..i - - - -' --' --- +�/ -- ' - -- ■ M 1.• 41� i 150 831 _00 1 SFS OFFICE PRODUCTS f.:UP1" LIE»,- �tFF� ICE :�'. ?� ,. 1 ,_; LIP P L I E . S - 0 F F I C-E 45 ,.! �J 1` :" L J .a OFFI •_i w 3 0 , E X 7 6, 5 0 47 _501 SX1 1"'F'LI ES- EOUI 1 0 . 50 SUPPL O F F I C E i1 � i_ ` ,mil U F" 1 L I E S - O F F 1. C E 45 w 35 54 1L1F'F'LI ES- OFF ICE 44.45 55 5 ter--------------------- - - - - -• 5 1L11~'F'1. T E --CAF F IC E 6.74 59; U 1:' F' L I ES- OF 1- I C' E 41 .99 I (( L } j^ S 1 -f P 1 L I E� f - (...� 1 F J. C E "4.65 f_ 8 3 e2 r i 631 1 5 ()4 6----- r 1 # 1; 1 / - t ...� f ,.1:'' f{ 1.1 .. 1't I -t i�1 E.. E PRESS E` t_ t. I E� H - 1�1 C'f _ _ -- ' -- - - - - - - - - -- - q -7 -- 65 Ii `6 � t_1 1 547 84 11 00 84 11 00 1t_1, 1 S T.FA E_.� L STAMP WO R K S) OFFICE ,;3 t �7 j i . 1 1 5 0 4 8 Sri � �,: 5) .•'' 5 1 ,__ • ,_ . 1 0 � 1 " r ' ~' 1 r T A f O ' ?.' � � . PR �.� C F 1 J: f�f i�I L s...: - _ T A - c F li L - •'f i T,_ •r , t -1 M { 1 i:t E 1-c Lt 1 t .c F �...� 7N ... 3 ._, ; � • 0 0 •.•i F �F 1. � 1 r _ 15 � � 4 9 �i : �:: t_1 t / 1 t�1 / 1 1 L w T t F F E i� , ,., �.. �:� ' T . S F k +ws �� A 1�1 #.1 F H L x j { _ _ . _ _.. ;; - _.. - _ . _ ..._ 35 - - -- - - 72 74 1. 5 0 5 '. 84:x:57'5 10/ 14/91 STRE I(.•HE.RS GUNS SUPPLIES E"0UIF'11E.N 64.45 75� ... V M ...1. L. !. ES {w 1 1 C., 1..E ... _..... ..... ... _ S •y(' � c f '{{' 1 �C Al ..} j ^1 _. _.... .. . .... ... ... _ ................__. -_ M. l '...a f'' ..... ........_I [ate t ` ^fi | 0 T Y op 14 A P L. E I-OR PERIOD 09 CHECK VENDOR C H E C K VENDOR ITEM I T E M C H C K SUPPLIES OFFICE 3z Zo Z57.69 | 0 ~... L^^. SUPPLIES OFFICE 3z Zo Z57.69 -___. ____- 10/14/91 .. '- T.A. -_-. -'. _ --.-` I NC - . - - . MAT ^ ~~. 4^ --- . M ATERIAL -. 720.80 4L SUP PLIES-V EH I C CLE _ __'._ -~___ ~~-~~. ._'~,''~ T.R.F. ~~..L. .~. SUPPLIES -JANITORIAL ^Z° _~ 12" `" SUPPLIES-OFFICE ~ `` 0 15058 86 1500 10*/14/91 TERRYBERRY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 113.20 113.20 43 ____. ______ 10 /14/91 .___ .____ IN C. ..-'.~,..,.. ...^.`^.^ 19.50 ^~ °" 111 1 w� 880_150- If)-/-'14-/91 TROY- CHEMIC-AL- INDUSTRIES S-UPPL-IES-JANI TAEIR IAL 0- ~'E~^`~^~ 49.88 54 8" m� : o6 2 __ ..... __-_-___-___________ o�*aou 10/1+/91 U.H.L. INC. ouppt. I Es-Eouzp 76.05 0� 15063 poozuo ---______ 10/11/91 ......... __---____ uwzFomma UNLIMITED ... .......... ..... _ ....... ___--- umzpomma _-_ _-_ -___ ...... -_ ..... __- .15 6 . . uwzFoRme ' 115.56 _-.... ------ __ _______ umzFoRma 63.63 m� umzFomma 19 *^+6 15064 900*00 10/14/91 umzvEnsxL MEDICAL euppLzcs EouzpmEwr IZ7 *� . 127.46 -9 A 0 2-00 --I'D 1+ f9 I -*V A LS D 1.3 H 0 P- - ------��-tiATNrvEF.-IoLE- - - - -`--��---- 506* 910500 10/14/91 VAS-1- v�o RUBBISH REMOVAL FE�s pon - F' E Es FOR S RvzuE J 1* .ax '.138.90 - ovo 15067 � ° z8mo 1 o/1*/n1 wxnwzmG LzrE-s oF mm ouppLzs� Eouzpmcw� +�.uo 4� .no ~ ,1� - f 'I OF f1 PAGE 11 "; Lf H : - t /C:HECk - .REfBIITER ; ' F f - A P ERIOD 09 HEt K VENDOR CH!:. t::f•:: V � ND +.rK x "[ Ell :t T 1: #�} =Hc i.f':: N U r ef Uf r R N U M 1. E R u A 'T E NA 1) �� t� t: R x P ; �: « �� AM OUNT A f`� O _......__ ...._... _ .. __ __ : AMOUNT { 1. ; 0 ► 8 �::s r:� 10 /14/91 t t: r;,1 S U k,� P L. I f ,, S E Q U I f "a . t I ' SUPRL «s C S-Loktl ' �ln St P P L 1 E S E Q t . f4 f -t=, 7 s , 1 5069 941310 10/14/91 WHIRL-AIR-FLOW WH.rfir'L.wA1R�- F°'f_0W 11143.00 1, I, 5 070 941 s 1 0/ 1 4 / 9 1 R. B r WHITACR CO. INC s FLIES E _... . 5 0 7..{ r( � � �{ �� i 1 "1 ,, ., r . Y, .. C f -" I R FI O r f - r k; ! 4 f.. � fti � 1 � � � 1 i�! ......... ......... .._ ...._.. _........_... - r k f r }_' `1 � � i F I • �`♦ � � a 1 U P P L I E C• E. 1 1 1 ! i 1' (('' } _ ^• 1 50 T Z 98050 10/1 4/9 DER MANUFACTURING . .... _..__. CO MPAN Y BOr.iK � +4 . 7 5 ( �,4 p ?�_, " O T A. L. CH . j yr 1G X39 11; 17 M) i - ......... ......................._ ............... ._ ....... ..... .. .............. ....... .... .. ..., .................__.... _. -- ---- .........,- ......... . .... . _.. ........,........._....._..._. ... »...-.._.. _. _.... _......... ...... _. ._._.. _ .- ............_..._.._....... I • . -. _..._.....j 41; 47 i �4A J ....... .......... _.. .................... .... _:.... .......... ........... _ .... ........................._. ........ _., ........._...... ............... .... ................. ._............ .. r. I,+ i.. 52 53 5 - - - - - - _ _ _. _. _._ _ ...__ _ _.._..._ - - - -- - - - - - -.. -- : J�II ,1� V CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0001 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT T PAY PERIOD ._ ._ -., CHECK NUMBER _ —CHECK DATED ..PAYEE - _. _ . AMOUNT 0023159 r 0023160 09/27/91 DALE CARL SON 269.85 85 0023,161 09/27/91 GEORGE ROSSBACH 269. 85 GARY W BAST I AN 306-066 002316:3 09/27/91 FRANCES L.. JUKER 269a 85 0023164 09/27/91 MICHAEL A McGUIRE 3 0023.165 09/127/91 GAIL BLACKS ONE # , 977a 60 0023166 09/27/91 GRETCHEN MAGLICH 1, 0023167 09/27/91 KATHRYN R a S MITH K53 a# ws 002 3 168 J-JAHN I 004-a 50 0023169 09/27/91 LYLE SWANSON Is, 151.02 0023170 09/27/91 LARRY J CUDE 300. 00 002 317 11 09/27/9.1 ANDREA J OSTER 1, 126, 90 0023172 09/27/91 91 WILLIAM►# MIKISKA Is IV 20 0023173 09/27/91 DANIEL F FAUST 2 1t 233a 86 0023174 09/27/91 THERESE CARLSON 988w50 002 3, 17 5 09/27/91 DEBORAH DEHN 497.18 0023176 09/27/91 ALANA K MATHEYS 1, 343a l i 0023177 . 09/27/91 L. H f''G IS REGIS 1 s 0 14. 9 0 0023178 09/27/91 MARGARET G I BBS 9l a 0 7 0023179 09/27/91 DELDRES A V I GNALD # 187. 70 00231,91 09/27/91 LUCI LE E A#...RELIUS 2, 061, 30 0023182 09/27/91 LOIS BEHM 1, 200. 50 f V r r CITY OF �► #A�t�. EWOOH} 0 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER ---.-.,.-,.CHECK. DATED__. _....-PAYEE-. AMOUNT ' « w ,•w w• 4 •• jjr ff ••• .•fwj + {( Jz [(( :/j 937 , 40 _ 'D02 3187 0 9/ 27 /91 JEANETTE E CABLE 91 0023188 -------- . _ ....... __._. 09/27/91 SANDRA Off...SOS# 927,01 I i 0023190 09 /2 7 /9 1 1 KENNETH V COLLINS 2, 291 ...tai 00 23191 € 9 CAROLS L RICHIE #, 141.57 0023192 JOANNE', M SVENDSEN 09/27/91 ELAINE FULLER 454,25 0023194 09.,,27/91 CAROL F MARTINSON I' 11 6,w 03 0 023 19 6 0 9/ 2 7/91 ROBERT D NELSON 0023197 09/27/91 V T STILL 00231-98 _09/27/911 DONALD..W SKALMAN. 3,01 as.. 0023199 09/27/91 RAYMOND J MORELLI 0 23200 09/ SCOTT L S T EFFEN 1, 5x. l 00 2 3202 09/27/91 JOHN J BAN I CK t 628.17 0023204 09/27/91 DALE_ K -CLAUSON ff r ,_ 00232'u } 09/27/91 RICHARD M MOO CATER # , 0t'&. 23 0023206 09/27/91 JOHN H ATCHISON 1, 0023207 .. -- _.._..._.._ C19/27 --- - - - - -- - __.... JAMES - Y OS.JNf3f' EN - .... - -- - - . _.....__. i, 054 a 8 00 23 209 0 9/ 27 / 91 � . - � � r�r ; r THOMAS J S Z C Z E P ANSK I � ,� ..•t��. ..t� 0023210 _ . _ 09/27/91 _. _ _ CABOT V _WELCHI... I N _ _ 1,, 4 39.08 0023211 09/27/91 RICHARD J LANG 0023212 09/27/91 DALE RAZSKAZOFF CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE EE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD iD023213 09/27/91 MICHAEL RYAN #t 00 232 14 14 09 L i 191 MICHAEL J HERBERT 1 ,1 6 76. 86 00232 09/2 7 /91RI CHARD E DREGER 68 3..sia 00 232 1 6 . 09/ GREGORY L .. S f t"fFNE 1,1 6+59a 24 ._..:. 002 2 321 7 09/27/91 RONALD D BECKER 1, 56l 48 0023218 09/27/91 KEVIN R HALWEG 1 839v 58 00 09/27/91 PAUL G PAULOS-JR& 1 1571,00 0023221 09/27/91 RICK A BOWMAN l 468. 51 27 .fs j ) .... j�.�w� J } `y.�� S 5 2 '.f � � � iwSL twT w 08 _ 00232L f �. 9/2 i .F' 9S ST EPHEN HEI NZ 5��. } . LS i 0023224 09/27/91 JOHN F#SASER 1, .. w w w ..'\ w ,.w}�r... �" ,. .�L w�LL �..� .. 0 . ... __._ { �± �r� f Sw� !"f ....._.__ { . S , 5 7 4 . 2 0023226 09/2 7./91 DAVID J I f OM flr L I 1, 622, 5 0023227 09/27/91 STEVEN PALMA 1, }. 9 2 i / 91 ..... ... ROBERT E ,V ORWERK -. 1, 5 i' 4. L8 1 002 3229 09/27/91 91 JOSEPH A BE RGE RON 1, 862 w i9 0 9./27 1 /911 _ . __ - - - JON A_ ME#...ANDER _ _ 1, 574. 28 _ 00 23232 09/ SARAH SAUNDE RS 1 , 265. 05 0 023 23 3 . 09/2 7 /91 JAMES M EMBERTSON 1, 683. 43 09/27 D#. ANE J WILLIAMS 1, 4 33 • 002 3235 09/ ,JANET L R BINE . 1 1530 0 1 0 ',�L"'3 09/ JUL S�' HNKE I , 1 26. w 90 0023238 09/27/91 CAROL NELSON I' 809, 83 0023239 09/27/91 CYNTHIA WALDT 201,41 0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0004 EMPLOYEE OYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD .._ _. -,... CHECK NUMBER, DATED.. _33 33_ __.._ , PAYEE _ _ AMOUNT 00232-41 € 9 /i7/9# JILL PETERS #, }.. 09, 34 00 23242 `ti. 9/27/91 JAYME L FLAUGHE R 11 1 169630 0023243, JUDITH, . WESWERTH... 614,,22 0023244 09/27/91 KENNETH G HIDER 2, 0023245 09/27/91 JUDY M CHLEBECK 1, 201. 81 .09/27/911 I LL I AM PR I EFE R I y # gis. 90 0023247 09J•'27/91 GERALD W MEYER # y i64a O2 002324.E 09/27/91 MICHAEL R #SANE l y 697. 34 0023250 09/27/91 DAVID P LUTZ 1,1218a 42 - 0023251 09/27/91 HENRY F KLAUEING # y 249. 30 50 0023253 09/27/91 /91 RONALD J HELEY 1, 226. 90 0023254 09/27/91 ER I CK D O W LD 1 `030 7 0023255 09/27/911 RONALD L FREBERG 1, 0023256 09/27/91 WILLIAM C CASS I 846. 10 0023257 09/27/91 RANDAL LINDBLOM 1, 0023258 09/27/91, _ JAMES G EL I AS . 11525.89 0023253 09/27/91 JOHN DU CHARME 1, EE6. 73 0023260 09/2 DENNIS L PECK l 845. 03 -- 0023261 - - - -- - _ _ 09/27/91_ _ _ _ .. _ WILLIAM R I BE _ _ _ r 333 € 02326E 09-/27/91 BRUCE A IRISH 1 y 862. 90 0023263 09/27/91 WALTER M GEI SLER 1 y 51i. 53 €. 3/ L r / 3 1 - -# # MET Z .1, 463. 45 0023265 09/27/91 JOHN R LOFGREN 1, 022.w 90 0 v CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0005 EMPLOYEE GROS EARNINGS AND PAY ROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHEC K NUMBER.-____ CHEC .. DA- TES...........__ PAYED _.._ _ . AMOUNT 0023267_ __ . LOI. ._ _X. BRENNER. _ _.... - - - -- _ .. __ ._. _ # 254. 00232 09/27 BARBARA A K Rf..#MMEL 567. __.___ _._LUTHER _ JONES_._ . ..._.. - ___ ..__._.. 79,920 002327 0 9/27/91 MARGARET KUNDE 1 23, 75 0023272 09/27 ROBERT S ANDERSON 0023273 P 0023 09/27/91 WILLIAM GARRY 0023275 09/27/91 ROLAND B.HELEY 1, 0023276 09/27/91 DANIEL BURKHART 0023277 09/27/91 MARK A MARUSKA l' 64 1, o6 0023278 8 09/2 7 / 91 JAMES SCE-# I NDELDECKER l , l 48,5 50 - -' 0 02327 9 _. - _ 09/27/91 - _ -- .._ _- MYLE S R ._ BURKE __ _ ._. ........ _ „� .... _.. L 9q �. 0.. -_ _.... -= 0023280 09/27/91 JOEL MAHLA 119w44 0023281 09/2 DANA BREEDING # 56w #9 0023282 09/27/91 TODD JAGOE 00 23283 09/27/91 CRAIG MI SKE#. L 490,088 - 0023284 0 9/27/91 MICHELLE H I L S E # 65 w 00 G WARD 4221w 40 - 0023 0 9/27/91 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 1, 487, r 0 002 09/ JANET M GREW HAYMAN 6 00232 M t 2 ` 0023289 09/27/91 JUDITH A HOPSNELL 639, 05 00232 09/27/ ANN E HUTCHI #SON 1, 236 90 002 3291 RITA MACY 178. 88 C) 02 32 92 09/ LYNE FI 61,6 09/27/91 KATHLEEN M DOHERTY l y 126« 90 v 6 Ron f.. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0006 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL . DEDf. CT I ON CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD ...._ .... HECK.. __ .N#.. MBE R __ __..__._ __ # _ "#' ____�.�._.._ __ t ' ' _ .._._ - --___ _..� __. M ____ _ ___.__ . - .__.._ . AMOUNT.. f 00 23295 09 / 27 /91 G EOFF R EY W OL ON L, 0 62. 47 0023296 09/27/91 NANCY MISKELL 435.21 co 0023298 09.s"27/91 TROY LANGER 256m00 0023299 09/2 KENNETH ROBERTS 1 274.. 6 0023301 09/27/91 MARJORIE OSTROM l 693, 30 - 0023 _ - 09/27/91 - ..__....ROBERT ..._J WEB`' #GEC 1, 420. 50.._ 0023304 0 9/ 2 7 /91 EDWARD A NADEAU 1 2 4 + 2 0 02330 5 0 9/ 2 7/91 GEORGE W MULWEE #, 225, 31 - - -- - S - NUTE SOS# _ _ . 7 86s ' s 40 002 3307 09/27/ ROGER W BREHEIM 1, 315. 1 09/27/91 DAVID GERM A I N # , 225 30 0023310 09/27/91 ERIC MARTINSON 48w00 00233 09/ DENNIS S M MUL''o'ANEY 1, 343a 7O n 00233 09/ ELI J WE I LAND 85.)., 31 0' 233 VOID 09/27/91 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK #1 22, 232. 36 00233 - - V0I D._ ._ --- _ 09/ _ -- _ _ MN STATE COMM OF REVENUE 8, 918. 73 002 3316 VOID 09/27/91 FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA) 8„ 685. 34 0023317 VOID 09/27/91 PUBLIC I EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 4 0 0023318 �'' _ _ .._... _ 09/27/91 _ - ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 4 .., 2 5 0023319 VOID 0 9/27/91 FIRST MINNESOTA 218,75 0023320 VOID 09/27/91 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD (HCMA ) 3, 565.02 0 - 6 is CITY OF MAPL E WOOD 0007 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS ND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD NUMBER. CHECK. -DATED,- AMOUNT _ 002332. #. � _ 09/27/91 _ -- __.:__.#.1.I.TY :_...& COUNTY EMP CR UNION _. 26 801_. 00 -._. 0 023322 VO ID 0 9/27/91 UNI TED WAY OF Ts PAUL AREA 1 0023323 VO I'D 09/ 27/91 C. OM ERCI AL L I FE INSURANCE 1 # 9.0 _ 0023324 _ U Q_I D . _ 0 ___ __._ _ ��f..�B#... T Q E��P. _ RED' I REME T ASSOC. � # 2. 50 0023325 09/27/91 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 358. 00 }02. 326 09/27/91 AFSC E 27,25 572a 76 0 9/ 2 7 4 91 A A 0023328 09/27/91 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION 708*85 0 02332.9 .�` 09/ MN w MUTUAL LIFE INS. 19-3988 1600 00 _ ...V.O.I D ... _ ._ _ 09/'2 I _ _ __.. - -_ �_ L-.I..C. _. EM P_ -. -RET I REME . T A SSO C 0 123331 09/27/91 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC ismoo 0023332 VOID 09/27/91 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 5, 43 . 26 C1023:3:3:3,- 09/27/91 RAMSEY CO SUPPORT & COLLECT 400m 00 i► -= 0023u534 VO ID 09/27/91 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT MEANS 45a 42 0� 23335 VOID 0 9/27/91 PHYSICIANS HEALTH PLAN 120,086 _OQ2 333� VOID RSA M I NESPT. A (FICA) 8, 85 }02333 ' VOID 09/27/91 PUBLIC EMP RET I RED ENT ASSOC 5, 60 85 0023338 VOID 09/27/91 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 546.91 .0.02 3339 339 VOID } .�' r �` _ �» j''+ �•» {{ RE ASS 1 52 . is b4y ottna i l ; .. I AGENDA REPORT Xodif i ems - ]Rejec Date TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager bwu'n C�' RE: 1991 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR 2050 WHITE BEAR AVENUE DATE: September 27, 1991 BACKGROUND On September 17th, the City closed on the purchase of 2050 White Bear Avenue ( Monette property) . The office, warehouse, and shop spaces are leased by Monette Construction, Inc., and the St. Paul Pioneer Press The purpose of this report is to request that the City Council adjust the 1991 Budget to reflect the increase in revenues from the rental income and the increase in expenditures associated With repairs and utilities. The estimated revenue is $16,200. The estimated expenses are $1 ,400. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an adjustment to the appropriate accounts in the 1991 Budget to reflect the increase in revenues and expenditures associated with the property at 2050 White Bear Avenue. F ., 3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Final Plat LOCATION: Ripley Avenue and Burr Street PROJECT: Edgerton Pond DATE: October 7, 1991 INTRODUCTION A- a l uum by Council ��orse f Xodi f i ed... Re�ecte Dat Mr. Gre g Brick of Highland Investments Inc. is requesting final plat approval for Edgerton Pond (formerly called the Torgerson Addition). This is a 17 -lot plat for single dwellings at.Ripley Avenue and Burr Streets. (See the plat on page 5.) BACKGROUND October 24, 1988: The City Council approved the Torgerson Addition preliminary plat, subject to several conditions. (See the plat on page 4.) October 23, 1989: The City Council approved a one - year time extension for the preliminary plat. October 10, 1990: The City Council approved a revision to one of the conditions for approval and another one -year time extension. DISCUSSION The developer has met all conditions for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve the final plat for Edgerton Pond. kr\memo55.mem Attachments 1. Location 2. Property 3. Prelimini 4. Proposed (17-29) Map Line /Zoning Map ary Plat Final Plat o W LL; 0 0 0 Al o g v 35 10 2400 N. .• ! 58 36 'LARK L / T TL E CANADA ' r > }-V IKlfi�C - o lk 49 � Q 00 L"E RD N a 3 W H y } W LAURIE �� ► s J am' aQ'' a Y CT 25 CO RD 8 m y CO RD B• _. ,.. -- N 3t. B RK AV ••,• ... � E AV o • s ,� 1 LDRiC?OE Q ••` a z ELDRI o 6E AV ` .. � h • �, Q m Q h t �- r;�. So d La►�ie~: �, ar • • F" y J BELMO LA m k8 BE LM NT a N :COICI URl Bed E'R G E AV �' 4 ... Co s..•..,. -. •.- • ' •~ — SKILL AV SKILLMAN • .. • yc LLMAN AV W EN OC PL � W LAW .�Aw •:. MT. VERNON AV a v f�sr�to�t tt MT. V RNON v •; -1 Z MT. VERNON AV Cenidr °D 2 fj- . OOWNS AV Q w w z AV • 8 Absel� w w Z 26 w A V PR 2 6 `. ROSELA N °• ° BElLW000 AV BEL OOD AV BELL AV BELL 000 AN � Z H o SUMMER AV 0 a ° o ' 3 0 O F E N TO N 3 `' Vb 2 E�Z �,, v, j �, i p A i — P P p 0 1 W R I P AV R EC R E rI oNl L w W �. - - — Q p w KINGSTON >- _ AV / KINGSTON AV > W W ]3[ PRICE Z AV } a 4 c °'' . a 30 Q TEUP 55 S 10 57 58 X 114 49 SA /N T 61 LOCATION MAP 2640 N. PA C J W Y 3 / C PL A IA C/R 8 ALVERADO DR 3 BELLCRfST OR � • 1 DEAUV /LLE OR � \\ 5 MERIDIAN OR \\ 4 N 2 Attachment 1 154 pj \Fbj ( 1 6, L -- - - -- -- n .3 7) SO-64 to a (} 1 6 3 4 pt .5 .e 7 ca 106-1 14) (+ (34) 611 4 (47) 7! BELLWOOD --&A v E a? 95"' 76- 75 Sao SS) %, 9 19 S4. " � �Z) 49 ( 11 ,4 ,51 ------ (54) a 3) 1, OQ � 41) (4 P-) 4 04: v; 5 6 g 7 e 3) D W) (!54) W; % 9 0-3 9 V, /,a O..S 0 &0 1*0 21 . ....... ..... *,Cx. .......... ..... ........... . ....... 4AS ............. ................ (3 .................... 0.01 (38) ............... .............. p I .. ........... .... 3o Y ............... lop .... .......... .................... or ............ .............. /01 . ....... ... % .... ........ ..... ............ . .... ....... ......... ... Z S4 &C. ....... ...... . ...... oil .... ...... ............. .......... ............ ... ............ .......... ......... ... : ......... el .......... ............... N • oZ ....... ... ............ .......... ....... ..................... ........... ........... .. ............ ............................. ............. * ............. .00 .......................... ............ ............... ......... ......................... 4L .......... ............. ........... ...... ..... .A0 14u. .......... ......................... �o ........... .... .. ....... ...... ...... . ......... ........ ...... ... ...................... ...... c T . s�a� ......... 00 . .......... ...... ..... ............ ............... ............ �. ,�, 0 C� V. 4 ............... ... .... ................... (ep 1) ............ b ... ............... ........... ......... .................................................... ........................................... ...... 3R ........ 5 9.3 ............... ............... ......... 0 . ..... ... ............. Su ............. .............. AV E ............. -3 ............ ............ ........... .......... ............. ........... ................. .............. 1.7 ..... NR ..... ...... CID (Z 4) Oi c O o x r .......................... ........... .............. .............. ..... ............ e. .......... ........... e ..... fiS3.4 i AL it' ............ ...... - - % w � '77 be. I L- FYA Ayt 0 -- 11 154 A� A0 A0 ro 6 IZO-7 120.7 0 66 1 zo .71 lzo-7 4 3 t'} �9` 2 6 5 4' 3 2 1 lop 7 TWIT 21 Z� o� � 67 0 29 16 73� � 26 3 20 3 (%12 7 *a 5 1 CA 13l 4 — —� -M4 26 24 5 <8) ' J ' 8 � II I — MEL 1 3 25 Ann Z, I 23 I % 6 O T 24 7 M) 40. 140 z z 7(/O)g 7 3 $ r' 8 r t) : (3) 15 21 z irr 0 lu ifs) zo 14 0 �44) (zz. 5 1413 12 1 1 19 1 rl 3) �4 3, WATT- 20 K 12 17 Q S 60 6. 13 S 02 Igo 3 1 , 7 ) IS .33 14 10 P. 197 Is t2 12 t 66 1.0 401 140 I PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP T E 3 Attachment 2 c • - 1 • sesame Wman •u•• 01056 wso •w O8 cOrRtmwo llMan��! ws,..r0 w INS • some• w 0044V sLA"M amd ult♦ $swim" sees•• »•• •�• sees • •• • see ENGINEERING � •� • ~• wM• *04 •N• OF •M ova" M wr.•w• .-- : A CO M PANY, INC•......� IN add" t .�.� .» ss+ ».. sw�rL .•••n�ic..�..c.v�. t�sa� wt .�s•soo� •�•••••• PRELMWARY PLAT r P R E L I M I NARY P L A T - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - • 1ELLMUUp AVE f . it T�aI1f•a 1. 1h�!�1 11 11� : 1 w' ; � i • * .1.]��C lt� _ Jtr -1t�� Av' 1: 1 1' . • f i s 1 t i 1 f t 1 � i • _ its 40 i : W f w T w, i r• � / t I s 1A R••r Saar V 1 ! ♦/ • ' 1 1 1 t 0 1 _r_ -__r_- s � I r 3 �.�• ' M - ell* .aan. Y IT ` 1 W • _~ • C � t .at s ..a+a• 1 - SO O 90 1OD !90 i • i .. 1 / 1 1 � ! 1 1 o + L--- •- - - - - - S& one a � s .. z . #�ti....a.. owls. •6 •NL[T + . �.•+''' Avg. r- - - - - -- f.. •rte , 1 I * ID OUTLOT B so* Sam ev sow t • w �._ .•..w• 1; w �rat �•.A r VR• M for Sol 4DM ARM djdkM& 80 Avr low 1=0 t 1 � 1= 1 1 � • •• _ i .1 1 1 1L L• 1 4 N 4 Attachment 3 S l oR Oi»' fSwNi EDGERTON �,�r��,,.s= POND I b y 04.1 i i /t. "v 1 33 jj CC • r \ N LoNf or roow s.w fk IV Q!� S9 S2 `E 1 °' r.•� .v t.;� r r s�.c ;� i _ 1 r - - -- - --(usb li 1 3 \• �` 6 ��>iI �` ^ - ; `r'V• •a'� hpf[/�l1t� N - \ .� v �( liq 'A t� lJ�-_•ts _ �� •t X .� (/� �' 3 it ► �kk • r I + s COURT+�+�ti• t` • otel - "'� r '1 I it td 4 ' ° ° . '! . Q, b ° � L— =�-rf _�1 y v �: � eke . A-� c. sr Cp•' � � Z �'' Vow-� i' M Qt s �.'• 1" �f a T ils,ii �'• 0� ado -♦ \�, \ \ \ w 1 t` r arwao z. q lot CI h3� yew I �� 4�ti ^, ESL \ _\ / , �BI•f�'fi•w ,g JP �' :�,•� 40" n (' I\ lV / l ip •�.rq.A -�• 1 i ` ;, �� 9 �`��•� ' � I r A �`� �� C —� c .� i ,;♦ I CAF'— L•.d� ;1D w /O t `J: � / �, t► ' ( _` it ' S. / o 530. DO qt' �� ridele _�- � e SWffF 1 'k iisat ::ij iss Ii sa 13 -/300 . `- 697 'V69•SS �� /l t_[ �_ N B9• S4' /S' E �' fr�c.. ►c.s i _ �S t. A/! of 1A'f N�✓ f(r /lJJIlSAV!!� Odor rt 4 s} •, , r — — — — — (''•i � _ - - - ---, - -- NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ALONG LOT LINES DRAINAGE AND UTILITY ARE LOT DIMENSIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: IF L S� \, Sw eD,? 5EC' 17, Z ?9, .P ?Z A�yslr L19- GAA.viIE /VAV. BEING S FEET M wDTK CRESS OTWRMISE IIDIGATED, AND ADJOrimG SIDE LOT LIES AND BENG 10 FEET IN WVTK VICINITY MAP R PSI w'1 A✓LNIY t . NORTH SITE, ' NO SCALE It it 1 ♦.l R-f LV - Iii SECTION 17, T 29 N., R. 22 W. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES V2 INCH BY I8 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET - MARKED WITH REGISTRATION NO. 16085 THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 17, T.29 R. 22 HAS AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N e9 M' E. UNLESS 0"ERIV6E WMATED Al O AQJOMIG REAR LOT LIES AND STREET LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. T 0 50 too SCALE IN FEET SCALE; I INCH s 100 FEET (� 33 I S B9'S9 • J2 "W ! W /63. DOS 4A 407 . r1 UJ � a $,� o w 3 ^ RIPLEY c c S aEET AVENUE ! N Q S Cf' 5'2 'w c 0(�� !O ov Q a 43.72 :; •.�; J - • AZT - - `S 59'S2 "w 8 9 d. w A4 33 �P�� Z � • XC v 143ZO 4 ' I .. 4 S. ,oar of M r 5W.4' a o' nce ; �e ;�i q► Sol.* o ' .Src 17 / v P22 W. U O PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 4 N 5 Attachment 4 F aip Y MEMORANDUM To: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Final Plat Beam Avenue and Walter Street Kohlman Lake Overlook No. 2 October 7, 1991 Action by C ©unc:- I Endorsed..—,-_,_ Re J ected. -,., Date Gerald Mogren is requesting final plat approval for Kohlman Lake Overlook No. 2. This is a 24 -lot plat for single dwellings at Beam Avenue and Walter streets. (See the plat on page 6.) BACKGROUND October 26, 1987: The City Council approved the 76 -lot Kohlman Lake Overlook Addition preliminary plat, subject to several conditions. April 28, 1988: The City Council Overlook final plat. This is the plat. (See the map on page 5.) approved the Kohlman Lake first phase of the preliminary November 11, 1988: The City Council approved a one -year time extension and revisions to'the conditions of approval for the preliminary plat. April 22, 1991: The City Council approved the plans and authorized bids for the construction of Beam Avenue and Walter Street to County Road D. This street is now under construction. The contractor should complete it in 1992. May 13, 1991: The City Council approved another one -year time extension and further revisions to the conditions of approval for the preliminary plat. DISCUSSION The developer has met all conditions for final plat approval for this part of the development. The developer expects to apply for final plat approval of the rest of the preliminary plat in 1992. RECOMMENDATION Approve the final plat for Kohlman Lake Overlook No. 2. kr\memo 3 8 . mem (4-29) Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 30 Preliminary Plat 4. Final Plat 2 rl e VADNAIS HEIGHrS f 9 0o Ro "o" .. ......... ....... .......... . ... ..... ............ ........ .. tu BEAM � w... w. mow. w► r► � � ..... . AV p I O 60 Q �.— I� Q mop 22 Z C Ger►�vis � 3 Koh/n►ar7 Lv.*e KONLMAN AV CO RD . rn � J PALM PALM g � � CR r I W CONK p 0 R � , � Hems/ 0 / PLAZA C/R � CT �- � AV —' o (1) CpNNOR AV � �� P ALVERADO !1R � 3 BELLCRfST OR I DEAf/V/LLE OR 2 � e ° 5 MERIDIAN OR r 60 112GERVAS 1\ �cw�r AV 0 1 ` . — TANT V GRAN DYIEW cc m VIKING LOCATION MAP S I T E 4 N 3 Attachment 1 r f . COU NTH .. w l0000� u . �D '� • 'a OA — - 'L� '� j .� -..fi .. - _ 417 4 1 7 ar,.. LOOM + .s•.. tow . 1 ... i • 06 •s I • �R�w +tit ww! .. ='!qt� •.s . 1 •./ — — -- - mow..... � - - --- • -- - -- -- - - - Wi - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - --- - -- - -- - -- - i „`•'r� • . = 1 ! • I 1 . • w T L 1 • �, 3 - 1 1 • �� } tea tali/ gin 4 1 ` 1 � fA ltl it �•�• t i s • �., 1 7 �a �. 1 — - -- - - - - -- W • M. Q •, 9 lip. W noun atZ >> R� y �►� 4. I A E r dol t 1 , l It 67 r • J..::.;:: •.•::::::.; •. -� •:;! :•::�::•::•:::::;:;:::.:::::.• ' 1 y . fit- �► Lisa J ti;L:Olit�: :� ,� S ��' •x ,'• • JILL 1 1 ,•� ::• :•:E �� •!f av ;f a>ti � 1• c R W �.•. / t - � 7tt X X S w tt •v T •A _ , • �•� ••: BEAM AVE. . ».e 3 am r _ • : J �, JA p G / t•sr� f,. «.K -� s s 1 f P ` i \ Q 111 x 1 � � • ♦ 1 '+ " lit flop to + t�.� _� _ lot 60 we idtL + ,• )O OLI 11.x.1 w «•far>w� M►�rs� MMwc.rnwrC11,000, rN � � M IL S. Co. �� : ` - � -•1 T `,•'` / AIR PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q N 4 Attachment 2 tA dw N OF kwk OVA / A 0, AL p rAO. 1 WA OVA f � j m fps PA �r ..aoriseiscii h '4 hqhb�. axe over i oc nal Plat J Y •... cad ON f Lott Iron tlenustom mri e North QgWW Corner section 4, T 29N, R 22w t f KOHLMAN LAKE OVERLOOK NO 2 -Norm ties of S>r 1/4 of NE 1/4 of S N M"S370'w 125.60 30 30 yo 140 .- . I 1 .02 2 t2 l • ' , wl �.1f•S2' 1 _i' 7014 — N }1 N 3 1S6. 4 M7s j $ �) �� A•21 °24'31• R�` --' l � M - � �, : , � o �'�'� 126.68 • °~• � � � � J ' 6 , 3 , EDWARD s. :yti s t SCMX:1 Inch a 100 feet 100 e0 e0 b W 0 2e N " 40 t00 scaix iN FEET CITY OF MAJOLEW000 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA W • Oenslss ton 11rnrMM fdoud In MMR 0 f�Mle " hell 'iPe " ant at end I m*" y �e*M/otien No. 10459. All ft Il c - ore to hundredthe of o feel 0", So , 1M 50.00 Net. All seo do cwvn ere erc 41Mthe. "Wins we an en seamed detwn, tench Merle it 104.41 Not - Top of hydreM 4 00t test west N Ima Ave. end Ftw* St. All a "tiees ere N.O :V.O. Oetwn.l19ss Aqooftevol Oroings" eese"W"te ere 5 feet io vidM, unless otherwise i kwied, oM edjow" lot liftee as shown so the Net. PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 4 N 6 Attachment 4 N ' < , Jy " >0 Pursuant to Chapter 7, Minnesota Laws of 1976, this plat has been reviewer �l j � �• �;' 6;y approved, this day of 199 and the conditions ` Minnesota Statutes, 05.03. 'f, . 2&051 1' 11 11 1 =,t u v sion Tiave been fulfilled. 167.20 Da vid D. Claypd6l, ! o� emsey oun y Surveyor t64.. 2fiS 1.77 ; 60 L.... # � , �� 1 / - County Recorder, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota i`b\ 0 U T L 0 T A ' l� i hereby certify that this plat of KOHLMAN LAKE OVERLOOK NO.2 was filed in this office this L O W � 1 ; 6 .M., and was day of 199 at o'clock f Tled in Book o a s, Page = �.... RCM e�� GreniN Mnn Orwenl y` ILI �•Ip'•oa .�� Fo No. as , - -- - - -- aMr--- - 2 Foet Rued Eeeenlent poc,NO. ts62ef6 „ (North S.M,. Yee dA A ENUE ,^ � eC o>,� L ou c enna, oun - 13 : 0. �,.. y ecor r BY `I a ,� 4 C ost Iron Monyn, 1 too •. O t ` 1 i Sir WET •. � ��- t , a� it ♦7/•1 / ' 711/LA r I�JIr ►� �' TJ� g• �`� eo` 2 Sir AREA 3. � ♦: 1 ; - '��`"' -, r, f - 119.90 - - ;` PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 4 N 6 Attachment 4 p Q' �/ • °� R =auo � . 2&051 1' 11 11 1 =,t 167.20 �7.sa�ttae'a0• csRO..1a6.4s `` - jN t64.. 2fiS 1.77 ; 60 L.... 66•w .... =; AVENUE... Eat BEAM 1361.69 t 1 � �.... RCM e�� GreniN Mnn Orwenl y` Sa,lh line of HE 1/4 of section I 0.67 672.72• o Eeft , - -- - - -- aMr--- - 2 Foet Rued Eeeenlent poc,NO. ts62ef6 „ (North S.M,. Yee dA A ENUE ,^ � eC Coot" :t Of Se mn 4,T 29N, R 22w `I a ,� 4 C ost Iron Monyn, 1 •/ 1 T / K IJ LMESI' I O t ` 1 i Eas �r Sec O�w Caner /� A rt *i A h1 j �f /�� 1 1 �Jr„1 �clron A T 29N, R 22w A �14M ♦7/•1 / ' 711/LA r I�JIr PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 4 N 6 Attachment 4 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM:. SUBJECT: DATE: city Manager Environmental Health Official SCORE Grant October 7, 1991 Action by Councill: Endorse Modified,-, Rejected., Date INTRODUCTION The County is requesting that the City apply for its share of SCORE money. The application form asks for City Council approval of the application. BACKGROUND The County receives SCORE money from the State for recycling and waste reduction. The County plans to give one million dollars of this money to cities in the County. Maplewood's share is . $.63 , 664.37. RECOMMENDATION Approve an application for $63,664.37 in SCORE grant money from Ramsey County. go /memol.mem (8.2 Recycling - Ramsey County) MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Troy Langer, Planning Intern SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit LOCATION: 1201 Frost Avenue APPLICANT Jonathon and Timothy Skon PROJECT: S & S Auto DATE: October 7, 1991 INTRODUCTION Action. by Council: Endorse Mo dif i e d.., - ,..,,,...�...�. Re j ected -- Staf f is recommending that the City Council end the cond itional use permit (CUP) for used car sales. at 12 01 Frost Avenue . Jonathon and Timothy Skon have stopped selling care and let their used car sales license expire. They will continue repairing cars until the end of the year and then relocate their entire business to another city. Code states that the Council may end a CUP if the use is no longer in effect. BACKGROUND April 13, 1987 The City Council granted this CUP subject to five conditions. July 11, 1988 The City Council renewed this CUP and revised several conditions. The Council reviewed the conditional use permit again on June 22, 1989 and October 8, 1990, subject to the conditions of approval of July 11, 19880 RECOMMENDATION End the conditional use permit for used car sales at 1201 Frost Avenue. tl \skoncup (section 16) Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Resolution 4 � mom • R � o 0 sit.. K W ` a P U 0 R _ v 1......... R C" r it R •. . ROAD R2 ., __j F R R F'W R •PUO I R F F R2 a ' ` R Irlt W � r E N F.J • • W • r r S 1 M 1 .�► R Lac c R R ` - • R qom� • 8C o • F `_ � t Sf xT Cr Mt R = f R R •___ a . R Y . M M1 1 fw Im I ..,._.. • AhA)vo « AV F MI — a YIC R J fM i r WAY � F M1 Mf C' M _r R R R -3C '• � R 21 : V COvvTY P LIOR •—•• LEI A NO '�1 ST A 11 C (R 2) %v F., - k Aft C i KE AVE �V �� R3 AVE • F R av o � F I IR2 ' R � 7 s t VAN W ..�-� • 2) E WOOD • r (R2 1 R ;•� F C! r' R .. F av / SA r Si c AVE F FE N 8C sC a { ��. R t- 49 r 4 F., IR r R L R F f a Sal s W R R t RI R i 1 3 R WI < �� R s Z AvE i n R \ s E:a !'•3 Z'jKe ' �4L EN Q 1 - I - 1 Z F { I / LOCATION MAP z Attachment 1 a TY of ST• *oAa s • Park Ga 0 9 8 1 , I ` 4 � 2 �E m Undeveloped Land -5 9 2p S l O•t I � r 1 0 in ri PROPEFITY LINE /ZONING MAP 1 4 N 3� . 3j AGENDA ITEM Action by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator Modifies'....._._... Ftejectea,._ SUBJECT: Final Payment — Bituminous Overlay, Project_ 91 -04 Da-te�_._..._...._... DATE: October 7, 1991 The contractor has successfully completed the work in accordance with the plans and specifications for the above -named project. The actual number of tons of material placed are somewhat greater than specified due to some additional large patches which were beyond the capability of city personnel to place by hand. The total project cost was still within the $80,000.00 budgeted. Final payment to Total Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of $76,167.15 is recommended. WCC I AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM TO: City Manager Action by Council: Endorsed. FROM Public Works Coordinator Kadif ied .....�___.� SUBJECT: Budget Transfer Rejected...,.. g Date DATE: October 7, 1991 Earlier this year, a new law took effect which requires that all "hazardous waste generations" be licensed. Due to certain chemicals used by the City, we are covered by that law and must be licensed. The initial cost, which includes the license, application fee, inspection, etc., comes to $760. In future years this should be reduced to approximately $250. It is recommended that $760 be transferred from the contingency fund to the appropriate account in the environmental health budget. WCC ic F - A Number _ AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director ,�� RE: REPLACEMENT OF ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE: 10-3*-91 Action b Coo --aci'l: Endorsed..,.__-.. Modif Rej ected.. Carole Anderson, the Assistant Finance Director, has been appointed to the part-time Accountant posit-ion in the Finance Department-. She .is 0 interested in workin part-time to allow her more time to spend with her -newborn dau However,, she has a to work full-time as the Assistant Finance Director until Januar to allow the it time. to find a.replacement for -her. It is 'Important that the Assistant Finance Director position be filled V at this time so that the new person can be f ull trained to assist with preparation of the annual financial report. Therefore, it is recommended that the Council authorize the replacement of the Ass-i'stant Finance Director. DFY: df f METR0\MBTDATA\AGENafd A Number r... / L7 AGENDA REPORT 0 To FROM* RE: Cit Mana Finance Director Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation DATE.: .10-4-9.1 Action by Council: Endorsed.....,. Modif ied.,.--.. Re ected..... Date-,"...."... An application for cancellation of a $155 ambulance bill has been rece ivied .from Kenneth 'Erickson. This individual was taken to Stb Paul-Ramse Hospital on June 2. 1991 and was sufferin from complications related to an epi'Lleptic s-iezureo The application is attached for the Council's review and action. DVF ** df f METRO\METDATA\AGENamb APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES NAME OF APPLICANT: H►��_✓_r� e��'� �Yl� � ADDRESS OF APPLI CANT :_2 � %�'� S7 k- RP CITY: ill�� 2-�. K�va� •/Yl� STATE: ZIP: PATIENT'S NAME: AC.- DATE OF SERVICE: 1 AMOUNT OF CHARGES REQUESTED TO Q BE CANCELLED. l � REASON FOR REQUEST -CHECK ONE: v 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): 2. Other: M L Tr .9 G,497' Ye.gy T 4**pS- �o a .Z k ✓Yl.zp� �L �iU S � a a 0 j '1(25' r-- I .9A1 t:2 p.0 lip I certify that the income information I have supplied on this application is true and accurate. I also certify that the amount of the charges requested 9 4 to be cancelled are not covered by Medical assistance, worker's compensa Medicare, health insurance or auto insurance. 4 Signed: -gone, . - �` ° -�l Date• ' � � �� INCOME IN FORMATION "INCOME" means any amount received from the following sources by any Resident: • Any 'Public Assistance, including but • Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, not limited to Welfare, AFDC, SSI, and overtime pay and tips Unemployment Compensation • Interest and Dividends • Pensions and Annuities, including PERA and Social Security • Rental income • Estate or Trust income • Business Profit- -for self - employed Gain from the sale of property or individuals, including Farmers securities • Payments received from properties being scald on Contracts for Deed • VA Educational Grants List all resi dents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any) : 1) Income listed should include all income which your household can reasonable expect to receive during the next 1 2 months. 2) "RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME OF AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT SOURCE OF INCOME (per month) (including employer's address, if applicable) A(Y leek L) 74�� TOTAL INCOME: o per month= per � year P Y p roe-,- 6 Aotion by Council, Endorsed Modif ied-.,__ Reje-ate Date-- RESOLVED, that the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the followin list of Election Jud for the 1991 General Election, Tuesda November 5, 199140 PRECINCT #1 Karl: Biebi Chairman Irene A. Lin Milo Thompson Rose Marie Manders PRECINCT #2 Pat Thompson, Chairman Jean Dickson Kathl een P. Di ttel Evel Axdahl PREC I.N.CT Richard wolszon, Chairman Doris Broady Alice Miller PRECINCT #4 Le Ann Kapp, Chairman Thelma Lin Caroline Warner Bett Eddy PRECINCT #5 Elsie Wie Chairman Emma Klebe Ph 11" is Erickson Marcel I a Watson PRECINCT #6 Jud Widholm, Chairman Sand Jones Gunbor Mowchan Kath Supan Lorraine Steinbrin PRECINCT #7 Bett Haas, Chairman Armel Pod Joan Cottrell PRECINCT #8 PRECINCT #9 Lorraine Fischer, Chairman Rita Ma Frederickson Edith Stottlem Lucille Cahanes, Chairman Delores Schipp Mar McDonald Ph Lof Ruth Lan PRECINC Pat Werden, Chairman Diane Galaski Ann Fosbur Mar Lou Lieder PRECINCT #11 Delores Lof Chairman Mable. Abbott Helen Kin Shirley Luttrell PRECINCT #12 Mar Libhardt, Chairman Mildred Dehen Audre Duellman Delores Fastner PRECINCT #13 Donald Wie Chairman Ted Haas Richard Lof Bill Schnellman PRECINCT .#14 Mar Earle Grace Locke Elsie Anderson A G E N D A R E P 0 R T TO: Cit Mana FROND Cit Clerk RE: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT SEWER BILLS DATE: October 10, 1991 It is re the followin Resolution be approved so that delin sewer bills can be certified to the propert taxes, CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT SEWER BILLS RESOLVED, that the Cit Clerk is hereb a uthorized and directed to certif to the Auditor of Ramse Count the attached list of delin sewer rental char and h char said list made a part herein, for certification a the tax lev of said propert owners for the y ear 1991, collectible in 1992, and which listin includes interest at the rate of seven percent (7%) on the total amount for one y ear. Total amount to be certified.* $172,805.580 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: Endorsed_____._.. TO: City Manager Modifie��.,.�.._....e_ En gineer Bruce Irish Rejectea.._..�..._.. FROM: Assistant City 9 Date..�� SUBJECT: McKnight Road Phase I, Larpenteur Avenue to Beaver Lake Project 81 -20— Assessment Hearing DATE: October 7, 1991 Introduction The assessment hearing mailing list is herewith transmitted. The attached resolution adopts the assessment roll Background The financing proposed when the assessment hearing was scheduled provided for the estimated project cost of $600,000.00 as follows: Special Assessment $27.9,135.00 Municipal state aid 15,850.00 Sewer fund 305,015.00 Prior to the actual mailing of the assessment notices, the assessment roll was refined. The resulting total assessment recovery is $289,065.63, which exceeds the projected amount. The assessment hearing book gives the notices and summary as mailed. No appeals or requests for correction have been received since the mailing. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution to adopt the assessment roll be approved. Any appeals that are received should be reviewed by the council at the October 28, 1991, meeting. i Attachments RESOLUTION. ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of McKnight Road Phase One: Larpenteur Avenue to Beaver. Lake as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 81 -20, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be, benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of fourteen years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1992, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Counc TO: City Manager Mo d t f i e d. ., .. ..... Rejected. FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date..,... SUBJECT: McKnight Road Phase N, Larpenteur Avenue to Holloway Avenue, Project 87- 04— Assessment Hearing DATE: October 7, 1991 Introduction The assessment hearing mailing list is transmitted. A resolution is attached to adopt the assessment roll Background The assessment recovery set forth when the assessment hearing was scheduled was $119,433.16. This, together with the appropriated $50,000.00 of municipal state aid off- system transfers, provided the requisite project funding of $169,400.00 Prior to the mailing of the actual assessment notices, the assessment roll was reviewed and refined. After the mailing, requests for correction were approved and incorporated in the assessment hearing mailing list as follows: 1. PIN 13- 29 -22 -32 -0040 Reduced by one sewer service and one water service to one sewer service and 0 water services. 2. PINs 13- 29 -22 -33 -001 through 0060, except PIN 0044 Rounded totals on LF of street reflecting elimination of third digit past decimal point for Ramsey County Data Processing requirements. These revisions result in a total assessment recovery of $113,421.70. The reduced assessment recovery of $6,011.46 is proposed to be compensated for by allocation of sewer funds. No other appeals have been received. Project 87 -04 2 October 7, 1991 Recommendation It is recommended that the resolution to adopt the assessment roll be approved. Any appeals should be reviewed by the council at the October 28, 1991, meeting. BAI i AtFachments RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the. proposed assessment for the construction of McKnight Road Phase Two: Holloway Avenue to Larpenteur Avenue as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 87 -04, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of eighteen years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1992, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments on notice and hearing as provided for the, assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or .improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the some manner as other municipal taxes. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT .Action by Council: TO: City Manager Endo rses.,w Mod.if FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Rejec to x -- _..R:,:.,..,.__ ,.....,,, �� ' w. �w�w+��.r..�,.wr...w.•+�w.roac �+►s,►.�..u.a.� SUBJECT: McKnight Road Phase III, Beaver lake to Conway Avenue Project 87- 05— Assessment Nearing DATE: October 7, 1991 Introduction The assessment hearing mailing list is herewith transmitted. A resolution to adopt the assessment roll is attached. Background The assessment hearing mailing list reflects refinement of the assessment roll made prior to mailing of the notices. The assessment hearing mailing list also incorporates six corrections made after the mailings. The property owners of these six parcels have been mailed revised ` notices. The. corrections made are as follows: *1. PIN 25- 29 -22 -32 -0002 Reduce assessment by 3,523 SF to 15,353 SF *2. PIN 25- 29 -22 -32 -0004 Reduce assessment by 3,073 SF to 12,839 SF *3. PIN 25 29 -22 -33 -0050 Reduce assessment by 2,120 SF to 11 -,660 SF 4. PIN 25- 29 -22 -32 -0030 Reduce assessment by 55,749 SF to 294,038 SF Project 87 -05 2 October 7, 1991 5. PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0072 Reduce assessment by 44,208 SF to 56,772 SF and change rate from $0.06 /SF to $0.03 SF. *b. PIN 25- 29 -22 -24 -0072 Reduce assessment to 24,472 SF. Correct total area (information to Ramsey County = 35,164 SF). Previous assessment (Project 83 -07 = .10 SF). *Ramsey County records for parcel square footage were incorrect. Attached are five assessment appeals or requests for deferment which have been received to date. The assessment appeals are distinct form the corrections except for correction Item 4 for PIN 25- 29 -22 -32 -0030. These refinements and corrections reduce the total assessment recovery to $289,336.47. At the time that the assessment hearing was scheduled it was projected that the assessment recovery would be $299,258.69. The reduction in actual assessment recovery will necessitate a corresponding increase in the sewer fund component of the financing. However, it should be noted that the sewer fund portion was reduced from that presented at at public hearing of $335,444.00 to $299,692.00 at the time of scheduling the assessment hearing. The final amount of sewer fund financing needs to be $307,613.53. The MSA off- system component of financing and total project cost remain at $153,050.00 and $750,000.00, respectively. Recommendation It is recommended the assessment roll be adopted by approval of the attached resolution. It is recommended that all appeals be reviewed by the council at its October 2$, 1991, meeting. [Ova i Attachments RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of McKnight Road Phase Three: Beaver Lake to Conway Avenue as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 87 -05, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment . against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual. installments extending over a period of eighteen years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1992, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating . to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the some manner as other municipal taxes. Beaver Lake Lutheran Church 2280 Stillwater Avenue Pastors: Gerald W. Smith Kenneth L. Rou f s October 1, 1991 City Clerk - City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN. 55119 Dear City of Maplewood, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55119 Church Office: 739 -8092 739 -8306 RECE�VED 0 C T 0 3 1991 I am writing this in reply to the notice we recently received in regard to our sewer assessment by the City of Maplewood in the amount of approximately $21,000.00. Our church congregation is somewhat saddened by the amount which is assessed to us and in light of our congregation just beginning a new phase of construction to our church building. This could not come at a worse time for us especially when we are and have encouraged our members to v • g give for the specific purpose -- that of a commitment to our building expansion program. We, as a. congregation, realize that this is an enormous assessment and we will be holding a special congregational meeting to deal with it. However, I.am asking that, if possible, there could be a reduced assessment for this time period. Our ministry, as most, exists on the generosity of the members and so do we. We are working with a deficit at the present time to meet our ongoing ministries and find this assessment excessive for us at this time. I am asking for are-consideration to this assessment at this time. We realize that many in our neighborhood will be assessed as well and that bills must be P aid. However, we urge your consideration to this letter. Yours in Christ, J Pastor J r Sm't The Congregation of Beaver Lake Lutheran Church NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, will meet in the ....... Heil cham e ildin , 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota at 7:40 p.m. on Monday, October 14, 199 to hear all persons concerning the adoption of essmen ro or u ic mp veme c -OS and to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended, This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment roll as herein described is on file in the office of the city clerk. The total amount to be assessed is $297,298.53. AREA TO BE ASSESSED: Property adjacent to Lakewood Drive, Stillwater Road, and McKnight Road from Beaver Lake to Conway Avenue. All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment : .adopted unless a written objection signed by the property owner is filed with the city clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer of the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to MSA Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the mayor or city clerk of the City of Maplewood within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the mayor and city clerk. Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the city may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying for such deferment are available from the city clerk. The following information shall also apply: 1. The property ow s all ave the n ht to prepay the essment. Your assessment may be paid without interes ram October 15, 1491 to November 13, 1991 to the city clerk at city hall, 1830 East County Road B, op ew to. 20 Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25 percent of the total assessment has bean authorized by ordinance. 3. The rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time ,period, is proposed to be nine percent commencing on the date of adoption by the city council. 4. The amount to be specially assessed against your property is shown on the attached notice of pending public improvement. This is an important hearing because this is your lost opportunity to be heard on the matter of this assessment which affects your property. If you have any questions regarding this assessment, please call the engineering department at 770 -4550 or the cif1 clerk at 770.4500. Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk City of Mcplewood, Minnesota 1kr CD E; Z3 � rVI I=- 1*14 -1- P R 0 i C 1- 0 THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WI LL RECEIVE IT IS IMPORTANT THF"i"l- 'YLJ6 1*,',., LIA I"" AND OBLI GAT IONS CONCERNING "rFus Us A "SESSMENT • HEARING. YOUR ASSESSMEN-l" 30 1 G AS FOLLOWS: J r REE I b I ri L) A'. J"WH* 4'*' 4' 'w 4- STORM SEW. (Rl/km) SF i-t' f A- 10 -0- ** *349 787.000 STORM SEW. (C/' :R /5C /Dry /*m) Slz w WATER ty',AIN r:f: AT 0 E HL QAL) wo-rER SERVICE (111) EA AT �. � �� '� � • `~1 -- ��•�• �•�• � . - WATER SERV'.L-CE (8") L Al i7i 6 Q l 3 0 .-A SANO A T '000 SAN. SEWLCR SEk'V,'L*CL LL*k ili'i 4, so LHLn YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL i --- 587. , PLEEEAGE • REFER W H t'N R E G! U E S - ,1" 11\10, ' I Nilr` b I �11 11 L) 1',; L) +\ L., 0 1 0. 1 N" TO PARCEL IDEENTIf: NOTE: 0 B J E C*01 "1" 1 Cj,'-%; ( 1) 1:) Ll Lj HE '• 1 0 ON Y PART ASSESSMENi HEARINL-j. A B S 0 L LiTE L'y 1'4 L) IJ L:- L_ LJ 1% 1 OF THIS ASS E%E; N "f' MAPLEWOOD Cr 1 TY C.'#% 0 'Lj 1 %4 10-14-91 KETACH kND RL'_TJF.N TH1.213 PORTILON WlTh Y0JR PA�'r-.ZNT ASSESSMENT PAYMENT f PROJECT NO. 6'i 0 5 McKNIGHT RD.—PHASE 3 PIN 25-29-22-1232— TOTAL ASSESSMENT -***$ 967. 22 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED PARTIAL PAYM' NT Cti- H'a HL.) A� THGRIZZ.Ei). r ,9r w 0 t I C E O F P E N n I N G P C l M N R U V E M E N T IMPRuVEHENT NAME i MCNT 87 -05 IMPROVEMENT No 8 5929 PINS ID 25 29 22 32 0030 BEAVER LK EVANG LUYH CHURCH 2280 STILLkATER 90AD MAPL EWOOD MN 55119a.3845 PROPERTY JESCRIPTYON swam REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 21 SU BJ TU RDS b ESMTSs THE FOL; TRACT A OF REG LAND SURVEY NO 137 E IN REG LAND URVEY NEI 21.9 TRACT A A AA cr 7 10 .. 7 - o7f-4,70...53 "at 6 .-� ..✓a.o ,ae - u�.t..�.rl� �f ...u�iil .4. a...,. ,F.c... y ¢a+.�,...dc & ,Cie 1 J i � � ., �-- -- -LPL -•- ... � �7 � - C..��- �3- '�' �- � / 1 / Lt . ��-�•� ' � l � �� •. l t "71 L .•e rr..... -- 1 -T7 "�.• 3 .1.../ � / � � r � Gam' �• � �� L,� .l �. �.+..rZ"."`. -.t �l- _..�i.� �... ✓t l "`"' 7 I L ✓ �..-. ''�+�`.. � t"' �-'-!� • �' J .� j q { 1 f cam( • /' � , _ J CIS r� C7 I M+ Y AA 4 §4t4c,1.4e.-. 7 Rn E t, SEP 3 w y u.• � � w w r wr � � � � r � a g e 0 70 Ale O ��a/ buy a.t� -n. �' EC.GcceJ �� O (. ¢ �a� LL�2Q�• GL�/I.t�«'• -• ��CL� l�lcGlk/ ��(.tc,e C- c.�KCtt2�EE�x�b�Ki LZL w DoU 00 ft, . • r W . r IL dr aor L� r' 00 1 w � C� • ` 1 I r • •/rr l •r s !or �•r .. 1•t i ► C; iAl ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -05 Address of Assessed Parcel /Di ° J 11d. .� �i7e 4� o o cr Property Identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. ��) Deferral of assessment b. Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (�) Cancellation of assessment d. C) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: /r/ur m � � Ilk") Ap-o (Print Name) (signat re) (Date) ( of Property Owner) 7. O 2--o Telephone Zip / r TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM Action by Counc' Endorsed. City Manager ........._.wM.._.,...,.. loo di f i e d. .�...�.....�,.. Rejected. Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87-32—Assessment Hearing October 8, 1991 Introduction Transmitted herewith is the assessment hearing. book for Project 87 -32. A resolution is attached to adopt the assessment roll. Background The assessment roll is based on the basis presented at the public hearing. That is, unit assessment of $500 per residential property and rates of $0.10 per square foot for high- density housing, commercial, school, church, and other nonresidential property. A rate of ..$0.025 per square foot was used for park property due to the low ratio of .impervious 'surfacing and reduced runoff rate. It should be noted that the DNR trail- is classified at the $0.10 /SF rate due to the higher ratio of surface area of the trail to the relatively narrow corridor. After mailing the assessment notices, a number of errors were identified. Revision notices were sent to the owners of the ten affected properties. The assessment hearing book incorporates these revisions. The revisions are as follows: 1. PIN 10 29 - 22 - 32 - 0019 Increase by 180,583 SF to 466,337 SF. (combines 10- 29 -22 -31 -0086 and 10 -29- 22 -32 -0015) 2. PIN 10- 29 -22 -43 -0048 Reduce by two units to two units ($1 ,000 total) 3. PIN 10- 29 -22 -44 -0077 Reduce by one unit to one unit ($500 total) 4. PIN 10- 29 -22 -44 -0090 Reduce by one unit to one unit ($500 total) 5. PIN 15- 29 -22 -11 -0037 Reduce by one unit to 0 units (no assessment) 6. PIN 10- 29 -22 -33 -0039 Reduce by one unit to 0 units (no assessment) 7. PIN 10- 29 -22 -33 -0040 Reduce by one unit to 0 units (no assessment) 8. PIN 15- 29 -22 -12 -0006 Reduce - by one unit to one unit ($500 total) 9. PIN 15- 29- 22 -12 -0007 Reduce by one unit to one unit ($500 total) 10. PIN 15- 29 -22 -22 -0042 Reduce by 33,140 SF to 70,097 SF (Gladstone Park The assessment roll, including the above corrections, recovers $695,372.43. Sixteen appeals or requests for deferment, which are distinct from the corrections, have been received to date. Copies of these appeals or requests for deferment are attached. It is recommended that all appeals or deferment requests be evaluated by staff and reviewed by the council at the October 28, 1991, meeting. The assessment roll does not yet include a proposed assessment against Ramsey County. Ramsey County has proposed additional drainage improvements in the Footprint area on .Prosperity to be paid for at their cost. A proposal was solicited from the Footprint Lake contractor for additional work the county desired to have completed. The quote was extremely exaggerated and was declined. They also requested a proposal from Brown and Cris, the contractor for Cit Project 90 -07. The quote for approximately $5,000.00 was deemed reasonable by the county and accepted. Project 87 -32 2 October 8, 1991 During the construction phase of City -Wide Water Main Extensions and Improvements, Project 90 -07, it was evident that the existing culvert crossing Cypress at County Road C and .three driveway culverts on Arcade just north of Roselawn were deficient. The existing culverts were too short and /or deteriorated such that they posed a roadside hazard to motorists due to the abrupt slope down to the inlets or headwalls.. They also impeded drainage and limited grading options. Since these culverts were not entirely a county or city responsibility and it was deemed the most expeditious time to correct these deficiencies,, an agreement providing for replacement with new longer culverts was reached with representatives of Ramsey County Public Works Department: The county agreed to pay for 50 percent of each of the culvert replacements, with the other 50 percent of the cost to be paid by the city. Each culvert replacement costs approximately $1,5.00.00. In view of the proposed cost sharing for hazardous culvert replacement to be done as part of City Project 90 -07, the county requested that the city also have Brown and Cris do the work on Prosperity. Under this arrangement, Ramsey County would be assessed for the full - cost of Prosperity work, plus their share of the culvert replacements, at approximately $5,000.00 and $3,000.00, respectively. The county has a budget to pay for assessments. It was agreed that the county would waive all Chapter 429 notification requirements. The assessment recovery from Ramsey County is to be transferred to City Project 90 -07 since the expenditures will be made under this project. An assessment against Ramsey County will be presented for inclusion with the final assessment roll. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached assessment roll be adopted by passage of the attached resolution. i Attachments RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Footprint Lake Trunk Storm Sewer as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 87 -32, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nineteen years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1992, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such - later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the some manner as other municipal taxes. 4 10- 29 -22 -31 -0085 PIN CITY OF MAPLEWOOD : OC'T'OBER 3,19 91 We received a assessment of 1,000.00 for storm sewer - systems. Our question is, Why are we assess 1,000.00.for one lot Our home is on one lot, One home. Never do we plan on having more than home on our land. The home we own is in the middle of the land and cannot be made into two lots without Y moving the home and that will never happen. We do not need two sewers systems for one home. William Bossard is trying to have tis shorten the length of our home. We will never do thatlThat is the only way William can build another home on part of that lot. In no way will we help this man. If he ever did get approval from the City of . ppr. Y Maplewood to build a home on half of the land he should be held responsible for the $500.00 for a sewer system if needed. Why bill us for something that we don't have and don't need. If ever it occurs that William Bossard a sewer system then you should bill him not us. My understanding is one sewer to one home. We have one home on our land. Please help Any questions please call. David and Laura Bates 2291 Hazelwood . Mapelwood,Mn 55109 770 -7080 S `• ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 Address of Assessed Parcel Property Identification Number: (12 digit numb r) a Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be corani etPd and fa].ed witr *.. city clerk. no i ? }p1:- than tre close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment. b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C* (_) Cancellation of assessment �. d. (Revision of assessment Reason for the request: (Print Name) (signature) (Date) (Address of Property Owner) Telephone MW �6 C1 �1� zi SS��I z- Cl TY OF PJAPLEWOOD, V 18 0 E, COUNTY ROAD B PJAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 5.1.5109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS E -r ir-4 -7- E=-: M E=-: -Ir C31= E3123 E= %S I E3 ME= D/P NO. 5855 PROJECT NO, 87-32 FOOTPIRINT LAKE STORM SEW THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE 'IT 15 IMPIORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OB.L..IC-iATIONS .CONCERNING THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING08 ILIR ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 10-29-22-31-0085 15 AS FOLLOWS: 00k) STORM SEWER So Fa AT ****$0, 100 EACH = ********$Civ 00 C10C) STORM SEWER UNIT AT **$500, (100 EACH ****$1., 000, 00 STORM S EWER So Fs AT ****$Clv 025- EACH 00 YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS ****$I I 0000 00 WHEN Of? C-ORRESPIONDING ABOUT THIS STATEPIENT, REFER TO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUME(ER 10-29-22-31-0085 NOTE-.-; OBJECTIONS TO THIS AS!-.3ESSP)EjN)T WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE CLOSE. OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING, ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTION (ORAL OR IN WRITING) TO ANY' PART OF THIS ASSESSPIENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED 1-:(Y THE CITY CLERX OR 'THE PJAPILEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AF TER THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING, 10-14-9-1 DETPO4 Aw WTujN THIS PORTim WI T14 YaR PAYE a D/p NO" 5855 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT fot-' PROJECT NO. 87-3-52 FOOTPRINT LORE STORM SEW PIN 10-29-22-31-0085 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$lt,000.00 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - $ PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED., �S e o os: Ot •� • • ••• • • 1 • • • • • v November 30, 1991 Ms. Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk City of Maplewood 1880 East County Raod B Map I &A)od , M. 55149 Project # 87 -32 Phone: (612) 484.3305 Fax: (612) 484 -0076 Truck ... & 2370 ENGLISH — CORNER OF HIGHWAY 36 — SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109.2098 "YOUR COMPLETE TRUCK EQUIPMENT HEADQUARTERS" .1z1% 0V OCT 0 1991 3 - - -__ Dear Ms. Aurelius: We protest the assessment against Project # 87 -32 Foot Print Lake Storm Sewer parcel 10- 29 -22 -32 -002. On the 24th day of May 1990, Hartford P. Langer and Florence Langer his wife, and Jay Langer his grandson granted an easement to the City of Maplewood on subject property. Th is easement was 9 ranted In consideration of "all that is good and valueable." Said consideration anong other things was the cost of installation of subject storm sewer. Under the c ircunstances, we fell the assessment of $ should not have been levied., We attach hereto a copy of the easement a neemi nt state- ment of assessment, November 5th letter of our responsiblity and a copy of "Good and Valueable Considerations." We thank you in light of the agreement entered into between ourselves es and the Ci of Maplewood,, the assessment levied against the property be credited and removed. Sincerely, Hartford P. Larger F 1 orence Langer Jay r i O F I M P R O V E M E N T MAP 40 0D IMPRovchENT NAME s DRAIN 8732 IMPROVEMENT NO X855 4 p 1 Ifl 1G 29 Z2 32 CCO2 HARTFORD o FLORENCE LANGER JAY T LANG ER 2.014 EUGERTJN ST ST PAUL hA 55117-2118 f* PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -- SECTIJN 10 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 ( S08J TO RD) THE FOL . BEG AT HE CUR OF W 19 ACRES OF NW i/4 OF So 1/4 TH $ TO y L OF HWY TH HE TO PT 140 FT E AND 260 FT S FROM NE COR OF 50,19 ACRE TH E TO .4 LL OF kY R/W TH NLY THEREON TO N L OF SD 1/4 1/4 TH W TO BEG BE .ING PA OF MW 114 OF *'W 1/4 OF SEC 10 TH 29 RN 22 t� d T t C E P E. N 0 14 G P O L .I C O F I M P R O V E M E N T MAP 40 0D IMPRovchENT NAME s DRAIN 8732 IMPROVEMENT NO X855 4 p 1 Ifl 1G 29 Z2 32 CCO2 HARTFORD o FLORENCE LANGER JAY T LANG ER 2.014 EUGERTJN ST ST PAUL hA 55117-2118 f* PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -- SECTIJN 10 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 ( S08J TO RD) THE FOL . BEG AT HE CUR OF W 19 ACRES OF NW i/4 OF So 1/4 TH $ TO y L OF HWY TH HE TO PT 140 FT E AND 260 FT S FROM NE COR OF 50,19 ACRE TH E TO .4 LL OF kY R/W TH NLY THEREON TO N L OF SD 1/4 1/4 TH W TO BEG BE .ING PA OF MW 114 OF *'W 1/4 OF SEC 10 TH 29 RN 22 CITY OF PJAPILEWOOD 1830 E, COUNTY ROAD B PlAPLEW0OD. PlI NNESOTA 55109 DEPARTI , rIENT OF PUBLIC WORKS S"3"A?`EMEIV�" CIF ASSESSMrEttilT D/P NO. 5855 PROJECT NO,. 87-3 FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM SEW THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS CC:tI* THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE .ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESS11ENT HEARIN(3,. YOUR ASSESSMENT FOR FIARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUPIDER 15 AS FOLLOWS: * * * *85, 378, 000 STORM SEWER S. F. AT * * * *$C). 100 EACH * * * *** * * *C►. 00(0 STORM SEWER LINIT AT * *S5 50U4 CaG0 EACH = * *** * * * *0, 00.1 0 STORM SEWER S. F. AT * * * *V), 025 EACH = YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS --- WHEN RE QUE SE T 1 NG I NFORIIAT I ON OR CORRESPONDING APOI TO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION Nt tMBER 1 O --ES -2 --52 — Cj002 —o �� *�8 * * * * ** Cl.00 * * * * * * * *$C), 00 - * * * *$B, 537. SO J T THIS S TA TEPIEN T s PL. EA SE REFER . %IO OBJECTIONS TO THIS ASSESSMENT WILL DE AC CEPTED UNTIL THE CLOSE OF THE �gSSESSPJENT HEARING. ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS (ORAL OR IN WRITING) TO ANY FART Jr- THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMEN] WILL 1: <E ACCEPTED BY THE CITY C: t.ERK OR THE '"1APL.EWr1DD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING, 1 Ci--1 4 - 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - as - - - - - - - - - - no - - - - - - - - - - — XTACN go TETLM Tws P ullw WITH Y" PAY1+m D/P NO. 5855 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for P N 10 1. 3- ,2'2 3,L-? 000 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - PROTECT NO. 87 -32 FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM SEW TOTAL ASSESSMENT * ** *$8, PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. A 11LIVES q� e UL, MINA. November 5, 1990 Phone: (612) 484 -3305 Fax: (612) 484 -0076 Tru �1 � Inc. g 2370 ENGLISH - CORNER Of HIGHWAY 36 - SA1M PAUL, MINNESOTA SS 109 -2098 "YOUR COMPLETE TRUCK EQUIPMENT HEADQUARTERS" Mr, Tom Johnson St..Paul Water Department 25 West 4th Street 4th Floor City Hall Annex St. Paul MN, 55101 Proj Map 1 ewood 87 -32 Dear .Mr. Johnson: In addition to what Maplewood is putting in, the owners of the property are responsible for a water main and hydrant to service an addition to existing (ruck Util ities building. The owners are Hartford Langer, Florence Langer, and Jay Langer. They are private individuals who lease the property to Truck Utilities & Mfg. Comoany, Inc. A Minnesota corporation. Truck Utilities will maintain the water line and hydrant. For easement see, attached Maplewood easement, also legal description of land beinv developed If there is any 'further information needed, please contact Leo Capeder at 484 -33050 Sincerely, Hartford Langer President Leo Capeder Vice President 1 1 • , r .► RIGHT OF ENTRY AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT Maplewood Project 87 -32 THIS AGREEMENT, made this y�� day of .;� ��L.�l' , 1990, by l and between Hartford P. Langer and Florence M. Langer, an undivided 1/2 as joint tenants and Jay T. Langer an undivided 1/2 as joint tenants of the County.of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the OWNERS, and the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the CITY. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City undertakes to construct public utilities and /or streets; and WHEREAS, the Owners are fee owners of record of the hereinafter described. real property, situated within the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, described as follows, to wit: All that part of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, except the west 19 acres thereof, which lies westerly of the right -of - way of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, except that part of said tract described in the notice " of 1 is pendens .recorded in of Register of Deeds of Ramsey County, Minnesota in 11 1067" Mtges 589, And except also that part of said tract which lies southerly of a line running parallel with and distant 112.5 feet northerly of the following- described line: beginning at a point on west line of said section 10 distant 729.7 Feet south of the west 1/4 corner thereof, thence run easterly at an angle of 89 56' with said west section line (when measured from north to east) for 1500 feet, and there terminating. PIN 10- 29 -22 -32 -0002 WHEREAS, said construction project may necessitate the disturbance and disruption of certain designated areas of the above- described property; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the proposed project, it may 1 be necessary to enter on certain portions of the Owner's property, said description of the designated area is as follows, to wit: The above - described parcel.. WHEREAS, the City and Owners desire that all disturbed areas be restored to a condition equal to or better than that existing prior to the commencement of said construction project. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. The City shall restore the disturbed'areas to a condition equal to or better than that existing prior to the commencement of said construction project. 2. The City shall carry out the construction of said project in a manner so. as to minimize. any and all disruption to the owner. 3e That for and in consideration of the following items , the owners grant to the City, its successors and assigns, the ri ght to enter on the property hereinbefore described for the purpose of constructing the aforementioned project:. a. Exhibit A-- grading plan b. Exhibit B--sanitary sewer plan C* Exhibit C- -water main plan 4* This right of entry shall terminate on the fifteenth day of June, 1992. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals all of the day and year first above written. CI of P D By J Hartford P. Langer I Mayor B 6 en Flo r ce M. Langer `' Its Clerk J J T Langer STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF RAMS EY ) - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1990 by Gary W. Bastian, Mayor, and Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk, of the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation. Notary Public WALTER M. GEISSLER t NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) �� ; HENNEPIN COUNTY S S . --r"� My commission expires 3- 2,x-93 COUNTY OF RAMSEY The c �Pg strument was acknowledged before me this Y. 1990, by Hartford P. pger Langer, and J y T. Langer, owners. Notary Public � I SCALE IN FEET 112.5 , � ._. � � INSTALL 10 WIDE BLANKET TYPE REGULAR FROM STA. 2*23 TO 3*38 . . ~` ' A Dp ma t4 ^�r�o } | || . � " || .1 F171 4 874 875- 0 ool OV jj� COMMON Excip 47(00 cy - - -- -0. . ' .' � � INSTALL 10 WIDE BLANKET TYPE REGULAR FROM STA. 2*23 TO 3*38 . . ~` ' A Dp ma t4 ^�r�o } | || . � " || .1 F171 4 874 875- 0 ool OV jj� COMMON Excip 47(00 cy - - -- -0. L G - � cD x • DISK ON SOUTHEAST CORNER ``' 'EX. 16' CIP FM OF LIFT STATION. ELEV. 880.34 E X. LIFT eFM E X.16 ° GV IN MH STATION —� 3 ' - - -_ - 6" NO. 12 ING CONNECT TO EXISTING EX-CHECK VA VE MANHOLE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD CITY OF MAPLEV� OOD AND GATE VA VE • PARCEL NO. 10 •- 29 -22 -23 -0001 PARCEL. NO. 10- 29 -22 -23 -0010 BULKHEAD SAN. IN MH 277' 938.77 SEWER FROM SOUTH • WU 16'x8 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE. CO�.STRUCT MH -t U AND 8'� OVER EXISTING a - 55LF 40 LF 8 PVC 6 0.40.: SAN SEWER PLUG FNn EX . 16 DIP wM r EX. 12" VCP 40 LF 8" PVC(q)1 20 EX. 30 "CASING E X. td M i -I i PVC MH -2 8 PVC MH ' 3 . V S0 io L F .- Pv C C ` 0 i 0 l 1 -- 7 30' -3) 1 EAO --+' DtA. MH rtw- eTT.Zb tit.t' _ 20� REM MN a BULKHEAD BOTH ' W PIPES I � q w COr�NEC INSTALL TAPPED TAP _ SAt�1tTA1t�� I ! 6 16 8 TEE E PLUG AND CORPORATION AN g" a 0 c GA EVALVE c - 4c.# ' N i w _ \ —CONNEC STOP (INCIDENTAL) 50 F - 8 DIP 8" c �-�-� z,► it r� z SERVICE ze Mo..1�Vt. 10 a -•--_ _ _ _ ..._ _ _---_ _. RE.GAN LANGER 0 STATE OF M INNESPTA . NO. 10- 29 -22 -32 -0003 = PARCEL NO. 10- 29 -22 -32 -0002 ca PARCEL NO. 10��29 -22 -0015 200' 295' , l/ �� i'xCPO x 4 2 5 R E ST RA ON Sam as -Fio rr W to p ius 5 SY — Scat % SEE SHEET6 ;� !i GERVAIS ............. ::..... »..... :E1:r:iR:_ -... .- ............_ ..... .......................;.. :. ......»__ :.................... .....:......................... ._.... ; �i1 ..... .,. ., ... ». .......... N........ N .:... ......................:... -.... H _.i: ' '.:....:::::: :::::::::::::.::::::: ::::::�:.: "::::::::.. pl x- - ..... . . ...........:..... :n i�i.8.7. t. � : ».N... »........ 1,. .o .� .........:»...__ ... ..............:........ »....... ..N. ........ .... ......... ».....:. ...................... 'R 1 -g,RS' ------ ..........� - _ ` _. »...,...........� -- - - - =.. _ _ .. ..... .. : P_. �,1 :f'�. _.. 5 _... ..80 ....... ........................... a i t • . ; REINSTALL ON %)J , - t CM / L -•- - ~�. - y . . v.. .... '1....r '!•.L _..._.. -_ _ ..r - - -- - -- - - - -- CC�:STRU T DITCH z - 12" DE =P W /GEOTEXTILE FABRIC. /- i 0 .�� w WEST EASEMENT Zr 1 ; �\ 5�?7 32 LT. TO z LINE EXTEND NORTH - STA 9 +31 TO 9 +38 = 11.6 C. Y. 7 +38 40 A LT. w INSTALL 23 C_Y. CL_ n (3,450 50) z AND SOUTH FENCE w O N /DT 57. PL: NEW PEQ.M. w M (c� 2.00% SLOPE � z c LINE TO WEST Q i : RIPRAP. M - � _ � STA. 9 + 38 TO 9 + 46 = 11.8 C. Y. • • , �� •. 3O''`;�• - a w EASEMENT LINE. .� I 31338 +D - 4.25.E 2 _ - o s i STA. 9 09 T0.9 3 STA. 10 + 78 TO 10 +.83 a 4.3 C.Y. ��t BULKHEAD EXISTING F IP _ k w !:1 ECG WALL ` _ a -- - i . ; i • ; m ro .I - m SEE NOTE 2 m 77\_ _ I 72.5 rornv * r I - j i •' ti 1 , o � Gov � . �� ' • �� . 1 1 c n Qt m ♦ • . • •• f ' • ' . t ' • l _ 1 n •9 S'. ^ eSZ•ff1• - ._ . ,---•- -• z ,• • - X tZ• / I . < <: _ !; • to i 1 _ . .- • M 5 — �'_ ~ ^ ~- Awe \lm-VG box 10 7' - ._.... 6res �- -- - �- -- - - -- -- - ..{. —_._.. t ; x(I To l oN 5" RCP �- PROTECT �s' A°°�T' °;'AL ��M Esr�T-' ! ; : REMOVE 33 LF OF 3 -CABLE GUARDRAIL -ES APRONS) BUILDING ID v 3i0 (3000 sr) SEE DETAIL / 0:50_'I THIS SHEET • , AND INSTALL 2 END ANCHORAGE 874.20'. ♦ }t,,.,� �7A. 04+6 - F41 : ASSEMBLIES AS PER MN /DOMAINTP _ SrA. 5 7 F 4 1 L._ 8330D. CENTER OPENING ON E t'JANCE 874.00 — .,Bit .�,a 6Erit�•s NOR TH EASEMENT -� • - - -1 EA , _ e" w �t-Tap o.,- I�'' pt (Its 0 " : ROAD. tHSTAU.. VEHICULAR GATE AND D AT = U E GRADING SEE - 3_•�too t� ° �P LF CHAIN LINK FFa10E. 53 15� LT. • ' 8 Y,8 oTs �� SHEET 37 . _. -- -- 1 30 s F �� -" I•vvla�� Cis � 8 r+ x.70 �) t� P. I. 57A. 7 3 8 P ii 65 s t ID Pt• v (p �. a 4-6 . � x.._ -2 s� - 2"�I�sviA:h?M (�5� �— LIo'7o - Rctnl+,r.,- G�n••ds (�05 ►� I • -• - _. • - 17'•LT. " D 1 5_ 1 6A L.-o ef Tn P• �.. , — f-x. wM L V" • 30' ... CONSTRUCT 15 WIDE MAINTENANCE ROAD: . RES'm" - noti STA. 7 +82 TO STA. 6 +24 20' LT. TO ROAD. NOTES: 73' SPAN RCF _=•• ;..a•x too ¢Y- aftfft-SEE PROFILE THIS SHEET. STRUCTURAL ,. .. SECTION TO BE 6 "AGGREGATE ! _ ? -- 5�7' �•s I. : NORTH EASEMENT BASELINE - EAST LINE �dC',�,� = � BASE '100 °l. CRUSHED, tpF 40' PERMANENT EASEMENT. 8 - ---- Sx c -Or } 0 10 c 0.9 T OF MINNESOTA — A.0 owd lOd Z �o 0, I / c� .._. .. -�-� -tom G 6 ?o c (4) _ > j 2. SEE CROSS- SECTIONS FOR DRAINAGE DITCH i•5 'r _ ' ` 2C, t ALIGNMENTS B CROSS SLOPES. t l 5 Ga i• Task BLANKET TEMPORARY EASEM -M_ �z4 �� NWtTFORD P. , FLORENCE M. 3. 'PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR • �o AND JAY T. LANGER :REMOVAL OF ALL NON- PERMANENT ( Z) ! :STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT. STA. 7-+ 51 0RTH EASEMENT - a T E - �-- 1 � ISO : Ls I :: i :: WK fi 4 -L S _ .... .. .... . ' .. ..... : ' Fro Fos efl WRT T. co 0 w — •-' _ - -. ..... ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 o C Address of Assessed Parcel l C i rc ., e- Property Identification Number: (12 digit nuammber ) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? C C Yes o Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This farm must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. ( -) Deferral of assessment - b. ) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. ( Cancellation of assessment d. ) Revision of assessment - Reason for the request: �IA L4 k LA t, V4 �. (-00 ire < < 4k ./y 0 r4t 1 04-1 1. r 0 .' � C) •) - 1 �� kS Ct -. 64, ell ON � 73 R C (Pr-ifit Name) (Signat e) (Dat (Address of Property owner) Telephone �-- Z i ° p ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87.32 Address of Assessed Parcel /-S /. ..Property Identification Number: (12 digit nwmber) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ( 00 Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close'of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. O Deferral of assessment b. Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. ( ) Cancellation of assessment d. Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 0 4/44 IVA <51-144" a4/ %F % W i err- r�r n V �j (Pr Name) (Signature) (Dat (.,:p ILZL-- 7 77 ��l -4t cQ (Address of Property W er) Telephone Z ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 .Address, of Assessed Parcel _Property Identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes - No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (�) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: 11 lj2L, IN. L f (Print Name) (Sign (Ddte) (Address of roperty owner) Telephone zip T ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 Address of Assessed Parcel ^ /�� ` � gut- r Er R d Property Identification Number: 9 (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. (I/j Revision of assessment Reason for the request: (Print Name) (Signatu e) (Date) (Address of Property Owner) Telephone Zip Ile, 'Ile 0 � V 0-6 'o, loq le Of t 6 '/ "V Y 3 2 - ./ool d ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 Address of Assessed Parcel Property Identification Number: (12 .digit nwnb Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a.. (�) Deferral of assessment b. C5. Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (�) Cancellation of assessment d. Q� evis* R on of assessment l Reason l ip the request: 62a..P "A J. 121)" " j t N- a /q n &-�l I i A -A �- 01T, . A 9 a F &- C el— VVA L D tt A W2 � - /--<D - (Print Name) (Signaturo) (Date) /� /4 z, ZA A-=;Fx7 77? ' ( A ddre " sg'of - Property Owner) Telephone Zip ✓�' - .�'_"I ,� �/ 0 _ - _i • ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 Address of Assessed Parcel /�'�,� � e, Property Identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No .Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. (� Revision of assessment Nothing has cn -"I angea r?gar�ing Lot i 1 adjotnlnq 1962 Ha7 eelwood Ave. since tne Frost avenue assessment regarding storm sewers. Water is diected from the strut, via an asphalt gutter prepared by the Public .Works Dept., into the lot which is an average of ten feet below street level. The lot also collects water from adjoining properties and there is no outlet for the water to go to. We have a garden on the lot and in heavy rain storms water floods part of the garden. The water then sit there to drain into the ground or evaporate. No water goes into any storm sewer. 4, 0 7 r Iq rY ia"t,.e7 xmF/Vex:7 (Print Name) (Signature) (Date) ' l (Adclkes�! Owner) Telephone Z �,T/� ip 0 •.:'..M a ASSESSMENT HEARING RE FOP14 11 1 1; !J II I Cit Improvement Project No. 82-9 Frost Avenue Improvement —(White Bear Avenue to birmingTFam) Cit to defer, Please complete this form if y ou intend to re the revise or cancel y our assessment. This form must be filled in and returned to the Cit En e close of toni no later than th 's Cit Council m eeting. . Your re will become part of the public hearing record* I re that the Cit Council consider (check one): a. Deferral of assessment b, ncellation of assessment C, R evision of assessment evi * For the followin described property: .Address � C� � � Lot / D -�`-' // PLEASE PRINT: "�L� � � r �' tL;qz,!�;Na 400�1 (date) , natu 14'� name 7-7 > 000, Y(telephone f address tA 000? r , ., L/ Block Plat Mailing List Number (circled in l right hand corner on assessment noti ce) Reason: 100-1 ...... *4W � .. �.- 'Or t 1. V01101 * dF A ' � 1. � S I r / 7 � � � `• ��.. I. 1 � 1 � � � 40 to 9._ %,%. P 40 40. us other side ( • r needed) PLEASE PRINT: "�L� � � r �' tL;qz,!�;Na 400�1 (date) , natu 14'� name 7-7 > 000, Y(telephone f address tA 000? r , ., L/ s • • V T. I C E O F L I C I M P R 0 v E M E N T ,PLEW000 IMPROVEMENT NAME = FRSTA VE829 IMPROVEMENT NO = 5350 PARCEL IO QISI___EL.B low __ LQI_.._©LK 57 54500 — 112 — 01 NAME OF TAXPAYER CLARENCE G 4 ELIZABETH H CA RLSON 1962 HAZELN000 AVE ST PAUL MN 55109 FROFERTY -- G ISCRIPTICN F 0 I�ELSCNS HOME�I1 UNPLAT TE C LANOS ]HE N 10 FT CF S _433 F T 1.88 FT OF SH 1/4 CF SU©J TG HAZEL WCCO A SEC 15 T hN 29 RN C - 2 IN SO F , C bELSChE h LOTS 10 X . 11 1 co Previously assessed for Storm , r Sewer under . Improvement 7 4 —18 . Jill t/Z .•�: ..� % ,c C ' • "Z j co ff. Ir Lij �. , t"� � ,r te • : �t � 3 / .• `'7S G .,, • • ,d ,. I' l 4 1i. .:.::....c........ • CE or Ac is& co ,.1 , , 2 1 f _ i •- — 1 d < a Irl 4 IFT A 6 vyr to 4 of f f •� s �- i . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • r • • • • • • • • • z 14V fool co -T— r r. on ow" . w 1 117 14 1. �.� P w 1• r .•t 0. 4P c go �. O . `+ 1 27 4 r,69 �d cc 10 fib cr. .. 9 ri Z.2 / 1 ir 01 CNI 4A r Ic or Of r 1 1 R tb l • . Le Oda * Vh ft � C •• 1 IL .. G 1 / / / 1 r r .• 1 V T • , • ' 1iI 1 • -' 1 it 1 47 • / / � C � r J ir'• ! 1 Co �- • •mil L --� a' •..Z., •� 1 • Mj 1 / � , � •�� .Z +� fir, i s 'l FROST AV'LNUE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 82 -9 D" d CURB z COTTER r.r. e S 9.640 STORM SEWER S.P.(COM.4.) Q S 9.1 STORM SEWER S.F.(RES.) e S 9.0 v� PARCEL MUMBER. •............31 •.•.....•.••.32 ...........•.33 57- 298••......0 ....•14 ...••...•.•..35 •..•........•36 PARCEL CODE HUMS E 57- 29810- 290 -34 57- 29819 - 019 -35 57- 29810- 032 -35 1- 060 -3S 57- 29819 - 980 -35 57- 29810 - 119 -35 cuae t GUTTE r. r ; '.. _.. - __ _ _ -- -- --- - _ _ _ _ _ -- -- - - 57.090 9.990 0.900 • ! 0 .9aa� 9.920 - 0.090 CURB i CUTTER ASSMT. 549.480 0.080 0.000 9.000 9.099 9.899 STORM SEWER S.r.(COMM.) _ 0.099_ 9.900 _ 9.900 9.000 9.999 9.909 STORM SWR.ASSMT. (COMM.) 9 90 - -- 0.999 9.900 .. "'-- -' 9.9J2 _ ._ O.DO9 - -'""- - 0.9DA - 1 STORM SeuER S.P. (RCS.) 14.9 . a g J 9459.990 p 9459.990 27999.990 13592.900 13599.999 STORM SWR.ASSMT.(RES.) _ 9.009 - - -_ 825.939 825.939 ✓ 2359.800 / 1179.999 1179.990_ TOTAL ASSESSMENT 549.480 825.939 825.930 2359.899 1179.999 1179.900 •rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr -- rrr.- rrr -fir- rrrr-- r-- +r..r. - rrrr- rrrrrrrrrrrrrr- r-- r- rrrrrrrrr-- r..- rr -r- rrrrrrr r - rrr - rrrr - rrrrrr - -- PARCEL NUMBER. •••••••••••••3� •••••••••••••38/ •••••••••••••39. •••••••••••••40 ••••••••••••• /1 •••••••••••••42 • PARCEL CODE HUMBER 57- 29819 - 150 -35 7- 29819 - 191 -35 57- 29819 - 190 -35 57- 29810- 299 -35 57- 29810- 240 -35 57- 29810 - 290 -35 • CURB i CUTTER 99 r.r. 75.009 75.999/ 129.000• 9.090 9 • 0 9.809 CURB i CUTTER ASSMT. 723.909 723.990 x 1156.809 9.900 9.990 9.090_ - STORM SEWER S . t. - - _ .. - - - -• -• -.. .-.... -- (COMM 9.999 9.900 9.000 9.909 9.909 .0.008 STOR.4 SWR.ASSMT.(COMM.) 9.990 9.990 0.000 9.004 0.990 9.009 STORM SEWER S.T.(RES.) 11794.909 ,� 11775.980 18865.000•• 13509.9aa 13599.902 / 13599.090 STORM SWR.ASSMT.(RES.) 1939.899 1029.149 V ✓ 1648.809 ✓- 1179.999 1179.990 J 1179.909 ✓ )•• TOTAL ASSESSMENT 1753.800 1752.148 2895.600 1179.990 1179.999 1179.900 - rrrr --- rrrr -r..r..rrrr.r+ rrrr. rr -..rr - -- rrrr.... rr- rrrrrrrrrrrrr.. rrr - rrrrrr- wrrrrrrr- r�rr- rrrrrr.rrrrrrr..rrrrrrrrrrrrr- -.rrrrrr- rrrrrr-rr..rr PARCEL NUMBER. ' ....•.•..•.•.43 ••.••........ •••..•.•• ••4S' 46 ..••.••..•.•.4T •••••000••••04 PARCEL CODE NUMBER 57 - 29819 - 300 - 57 - 39799 - 021 -90• 57 -54500 - 57- 51599- 1 57- 54599 - 112 -91 57- 54591'0 -01 -- CURB t CUTTER r. r. 9.909 83 .399 .009 902 ��,. < � 9.009 _ 009 CURB i CUTTER ASS l1T. 9.900 893.914 i�.000 �• .909 8.009 �.d00 1 STORM SEWER S.P.(COMM.) 9.999 9.908 9.009 `� 9.989 0.909 G, 0.009 v - . STORM SWR.ASSMT. (COMM. -- � � 9.908 � 0. � 0 .98E' �� 9.009 STORM SEWER ~ S.f. (RE 540 9. 9.099 999 990 3966.99a 8915.090 17545. P _ 9175.999 ,/ A STORM SWR.ASSMT.(RES.) 471.969 / 779.170 2407.439 ` 2015.979 c . Q+ 2763.309 ) . TOTAL ASSESSMENT 471.960 1582.180 2407.430 v 2015.979 r / �1►��' �� 1763. 300 rrrrrr r r rrrrrr rrrrrrrrr -rrr rrrrr rr o . rr rr- r.r- rrrrrrrrr - -- rrr- rr- rr- r- r -r -..r r.�rr- rrrr -- rrrr- r..r - -•. r.�..rrr --r r.. ..rrr- r -r -.. - .rrrr 1763 309 ' PARCEL NUMBER. •••••••••••••49 •••••••••••••S8 •••••••....••S1✓ •••••••••••••52� •••••••••••••53,f •••••.•••••••54 / PARCEL CODE NvMeeR__ 57 91519 - 929 - 96 57 91519 - 039 - 96 57 01510 040 - 96 57 29990 - 199 - 11 '57 29990 139 - 01 57 29900 - 131 - 91 _. CURB. t GUTTER P.P. - •- - " --' • ' "- ' - 9.999 9.000 365 .00E 9.9ae� i90 . v B0 -r- '- 90 .9 AO� CURB i CUTTER ASSMT. 8.809 9.900 3518.600 9.209 964.2089 -e 867.699/ STORM SEWER S.F.(COMM.) _ _ 0.890 9.90a 95396 .900 _ 9.002 9.800 _ 0.009 STORM S�:R.ASS`tT. (COMM.) Y 0.8a8 -- - - -- 9.000 _ 16675.220 _. _ 0.0x3 - - -- - .. _ 9.003 STORM SEWER S.P,(RES.) 165536929x 1960.2.000 0.000 19466.9 0.000 _ STORM SWR.ASSriT.(RES 1446 .738 _ _ 1713.21 0.000 1791.339 � 0.000 0.0x0 TO TAL ASSESSMENT 1446.738 1713.210 20193 .820 1701 964.009 867.600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PARCEL NUMBER. _ _ ••�••••••• :••SS_ •••�•• :••••••56 ••.••.•••..•.57 ...•.•s••..••Sg •..•..•. :••..59 ..•.•• :.• :..•60✓ PARCEL CODE NUMBER - 57 29993 140 - 91 57 29990 150 - 01 57 29910 071 - 93 57 29910 - 089 - L3 57 29910 - 090 - 93 57 29910 - 100 - 93 ; CURS L CUTTER P.P. 100.00 It'll ✓ 190.0©0/ 120.000/ 88.833 / 84.158' 84 .150 CURB fm CUTTER . ASSMT. _ 964.999v 964.003, 1156.899,X - . 771.209,< -. _ 811.219d _ .81.1.2W STORM SEWER S.P.(COMM.) 8.008 8.080 0.800 0.8'8 0 .008 0.000 STORM SWR.ASSMT.(COMM.) 0.900 0.000 0.008 9.808 0.000 0.000 - STORM SEWER S.P. (RES. -- -• -- 0.000 -- 0.000 0.000 _ 8.020 9.000 0.000 STORM Si;R.ASSMT. (RES.) r 0.000 • - -- 8.000 0.000 - - - -- - - - - A.9aa -- -- . _ - _ ° - - - -- _ 0.000 - TOTAL ASSESSMENT 964 964.000 1156.800 771.299 811.210 811.210 ..-- rrr�rrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrr.rr. rrrr- rrrrr..r- .ter -.ter.. rrrrrr-- r - rr- r..' -w awr- mrrrrrrr.0.0.0 rrr►rr.0 rrrrrrr rrrr- r..rr,rr 4nrrrrrrrrrr- -rrr ' • PROJECT NO. 87 -32 FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM SEWER James R. Schwalbach 2033 Prosperity Road Maplewood, MN 55109 October 3, 1991 City Clerk City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Sir: On September 26, 1991, we received 'Statement of Assessment' for the Footprint Lake Storm Sewer Project. We hereby object to the $500 assessment applied to the property at 2033 Prosperity Road. We are basing our objection on the following facts: o Permanent Easement We agreed to a 10 foot permanent easement on the south side of our property. We did not request monetary compensation for this easement because we were assured that our yard would be returned to equal or better than pre - construction condition. o Dog Kennel Prior to the project construction, we had a 6 foot by 20 foot cement slab as the flooring for our dog kennel. Because the kennel was located in the temporary easement, this slab had to be removed. 7fie engineers in charge of this project were unable to describe the finished grade. As a result, we were unable to determine a new location for the kennel and we now must replace it at our expense. We estimate replacement costs to be $100 for materials and $40 for labor (4 hours at $10 per hour). o Hardwood Mulch Hardwood mulch covers all our shrubbery beds. When the project was completed, we purchased 4 yards of mulch ($80) to replace mulch removed/covered as a result of the project construction. This replacement mulch was for eight shrubs that were temporarily moved and then returned as well as an area that was regraded around existing trees bushes. In addition, this involved 5 hours of our time ($50 labor for 5 hours at $10 per hour). o Landscape Edging All shrubbery beds are bordered with landscape edging. We removed and re- installed 100 feet of edging that was affected by the project. This involved approximately 5 hours of our time and effort ($50 at $10 per hour) . o Trees /Shrub Damage Per our agreement with the City of Maplewood, two - eight inch diameter crab apple trees were to be removed with a tree spade and replaced in the original location. These trees were moved to a remote location. However, the trees were not watered sufficiently to keep them alive. As a result, these large trees were replaced with 2.5 inch diameter trees. It will be years before these replacement trees provide the privacy and beauty of the original trees. Per our nursery, replacement cost for an eight inch tree is $350 versus $160 for a 2.5 tree. In addition, five - eight foot Arborvitae Techny shrubs were moved to the same remote location as the crab apple. trees. These shrubs were moved back to our yard. However, the extent of damage to these shrubs will not be known until next . s rin P g We have been told by the subcontracting nursery that.shrubs of this size are not available at any price. These are a slow growing everg shrub and if the have to � y be replaced, it will take years to reach the same size as the original shrubs. o Sprinkler heads Two of our in- ground system sprinkler heads were crushed by project construction equipment These heads were located along the road, well out of the construction zone. We replaced these heads at a cost of $40 for materials and $10 for labor (1 hour at $10 per hour). o Coordination with SEH Engineers, Maplewood Engineers and Subcontractors To prepare for this project, we did an extensive amount of planning. In the fall of 1990, we consulted a professional nursery to determine the type of trees and bushes to replace the 39 trees that were to be removed from the temporary easement area (our back yard), replacement plantings for plants in the permanent easement area, as well as to have a landscaping plan drafted for placement of all trees bushes. The fee for the professional consulting and plan was $75. This plan was completed and given to the Maplewood Engineers at the time we signed the contract (July of 1990), well in advance of the project start date. This plan should have provided the contractor with enough detail to plan their efforts for the 1991 construction in our yard. As the project commenced, a miscommunication problem became evident For example, o trees that were to be transplanted saved were marked to cut down o trees /shrubs that were moved in July to a remote location were not being watered o areas marked for prairie grass seeding were sodded As a result, we were required to make manv phone calls as well as to take time from work to meet/work with the contractors. The compensation for our time to perform coordination functions is estimated at $60. (six hours at $10 per hour). The following summarizes our personal contribution to return our yard back to pre- construction condition: Materials Labor Dog Kennel Flooring $100 $40 Hardwood Mulch $ 80 $50 Landscape Edging $ 0 $50 Sprinkler Heads $ 40 $10 Coordination Total $295 $210 Grand Total $505 As the above summarization illustrates, we have already expended more than the $500 assessment to return our yard to pre - construction condition as promised by the City of Maplewood. In addition, we received no monetary compensation for the permanent 10 :foot easement and received no benefit as far as water damage control. Therefore, we believe that we should be exempted from the assessment. If you have any questions or require additional documentation or assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. We can be reached at (612) 770 - 3604. We expect a reply to P PY our objection prior to, or immediately following, the October 14 meeting. Sincerely, James Schwalbach Beverl y Schwalbach Property Owner Property Owner 'Labor is based on industry accepted fees for general maintenance ($10 per hour) Cl f`�1A1 'L ji.* w iJf.l-0.� Ja j::lARTPlEfl4 1* O ��L� {L..f i.: t Llfix D/p Now 5855 E:C: l' NO.. 6 7--32 FOOTPRINT LAKE E►TOR11 SEGO THIS , IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE !* IS. IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR R.I Gli S AbJU G(BL .I GA i .I (-X4.S. ..i.1J'Jt:a t�1V:(JJt THIS ASSESSM�E:NT AS STATED ON THE PI T'I'A HEI) NOTI C L OF i•)SSF. SL:1VlEN *)" OUR T4SS T FOR PARCEL IDEN J%JLl)yJl?E ' . 15-- E`3 2:= - 13 — ' 0061 IS AS hOLL. OWS 000 S T1.1RPJ SEWER S. Fe A T STOh14 SEWER LUVI T AT * *$500. 000 EACH STORA SEWER S.F. A T EACH 00 YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS --- * * * * * *$500,r Oct ,-P N R#. J S :i ��JFC.1j�lJ�li =� T'I CaJV OR ( QRRESPL ABOUT 1�J !.!::� L� 1`�31��:1yJF=:1y'1 s �= �L�:r� E RE.:J==L:R L.t = 'AR(::1=L.,. C't C: , t i ! j. r� c J::..:.1�1L1�1 `T W .T 1. L LiLz t.04 7 .t 1. 1T!l i �SEL� tysEJ'J T H ARit -J6. ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS (ORAL OR IN WRI TIl 7 "Ct A1V T THIS WILL E {J: A i : {Y OR sr �f =�L� WC 11 (_:.I �� Y C - UN E C:L �. » f NE _ C.I L. AFTER ER THE i ,E LIF i- J:�SE�► Sr*i6N7* H EAH.I NCB, .1 �.� -.l y _91 DETAM AND WM TWS PQRTICW wj TN yaW pQyM hl7 D!A NO. 5855 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT fctr% PROJECT NO. 87 -32 FOOTPRINT LAKE STORM SEW .PIN 15 3 — ii - 13 -0061 TOTAL ASSESSMENT *IS ;00. 00 TOTAL.. PAYMENT ENCLOSED — $ PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHOR12"'ED. N U T 1 C E O F N E N J I N G P U 6 L 1 C i M P R 0 v E M t N T 11APLEWUCO IMPROVEMENT NAME s DRAIN 8732 IhPRUVEhENT NO 3 5855 PkUPERTY -- DESCRIPTION — F. D. NELSUNIS HOMESITES SUBJ TO AVE & VAC AVE ACCRUING 6 THE FOL; LOT 1 8LK 1 JAMES R E 3CVERLY J SCHWALSAGH 2033 PRU50 ER IT Y AVE MA NL E WGJU SIN 5 51 C9 -3 bl h ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 Address of Assessed Parcel ^.0 Property Identification Number -1 L (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? C�) CD Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city Cvtii to (ref r - vise or Lance" YOUL assessment. This fo must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (`) Deferral of assessment b. ( ) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. �_� Cancellation of assessment d. (�) Revision of assessment Reason for the request c,r - - y% C _u L am,. ZI-UnP, P r c (Print Name) (S ignature) (15 ate) oL ID C,.e-L- - 2 7 7� S�� Z (Address of Property Owner) Telephone U i Zip 5 a City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Of � e v 6 Gi` <Le.4e�rr-� /J ail ��. 10 �5- 29- zz.--Z / —vo33 . 04 " 5zz-� *oO7� 4 OF Oil— Z� or of /�LLGG /!1'✓r7�cc/ c� %z�� % %G .�� /emu✓ �r Roberta L. Brown 1475 E Eldridge Maplewood, MN 55109 �_� 777 - 7�5/ of i i Roberta L. Brown 1475 E Eldridge Maplewood, MN 55109 �_� 777 - 7�5/ ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 87 -32 Address of Assessed .Parcel Property Identification Number: (12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? i�o Yes Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the . cit Y council to defer, revise or cancel your a ssessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (} Deferral of assessment b. ( } Senior Citizen deferment (over years of a e age) c. (} Cancellation of assessment T 1 C V1.S1 o ?: of ass es sment Reason for the request: �-- A L/ (Print Na e) (Signature) (Date) (Address of Property Owner) 7 Tele phone /LI,4"n�C 11+.t/ zip LUCILLE E e AUREL IUS CITY CLERK CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MN. ATTN: L UC ILLE A UREL I US I r:RS. WYMAN Be HAGEMAN OBJECT TO THE ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT FOR PUBLIC IrPROVEMENT PROJECT 87 -32, WE ARE NOT NORTH OF GERVA IS . WE ARE SOUTH OF GERVAIS. I AM. 78 YEARS OF AGE AND IT WOULD BE A HARD— SHIP ON YE TO PAY THE AMT O $500 BY Nov. 13 � 1991. THIS WAS POOR PLANNING BY THE CITY, TO APPROACH US WITH THIS, WHEN OUR PROPERTY TAXES ARE DUE THI 5 MONTH . WYMAN PASSED AWAY JUL 259 1 990 0 VIRGINIA E. HAGEMAN 1632 E . SEXTANT AVE 0 NO. ST PAUL, Mnto 5510 9 4 ,` y • v ;a�4 . J, � •b r �•:.. 1 6th}+ FLti nt YaSr .ra+.r :a• aN al, .. .� • Y � 4rn lli � �� k + � ,.�� J.'°19X ' " • . , «L, . .. .,` • .s_ s. i� art +, t• �.r _ , �;` W .., ,N . . � ' +hl �,�+^ ta•• ?'."1f�• °• �.'$. fit j } t ' 1 s +` r '.4 ,jR + r . . e y .. • +- � z � _ „, t �s: > F ��n 3 r '' 1 ''•'1 fi *: . �r �. •. •. w. .. , >. , :.le •+i'. { {y s � • �� + / / jl �• i Kl 7 r 4 ^ Sa .. ... w h. w .. •6 i ' 7 F' • a t•Y. 1 t SN ♦ ,. ( 1 } 1 ' S fi i i � J >Ck idlyE,.+! - t wn ♦ it 4 ^..� a'•a• r n.r„ L.. � .. e v _ .. ✓, iR7•.,` y * ..Yj..,•,t +v.Vh • t_J. •: •'...... , ,�s ,q.•V 1•.'t•. �4r 2va.+►w;WC ! F,$f !k}>>� 4 :i lwc•+�a. +.:rr v. 4r .�"' :h f ^•t^ ...i.. < .. r�.tr,' -... .'w,•+ •�.- .•�... -.t �. v .O..Y,,• ., .. .�. ._ .,, ,. _ ,W ^. r �•,,. .�..�: + a. ttr ��rl'.ty Sys, �'F.1v l�r ^ � i -S NJI. .!,+. >^r;r �e x:a• :�!j .�,` . K•; :•fi .'r i. , s. :. . -. :..v . :�.-- .. .. . .. .. ; '1; .. ...� -' irs:•^S.. .1 .�► : iA qq , w..r :,�,p! ��r.:t, s:f1: �'!n . Z,tr � ;1 t - (•'��. .� ! <..;i - .. ... .. � .. .. . .. ... ..: r y. 3 ..�. «•.r � os y �.w�'+L rh+' ^ .l..r Y�Xa'% t,,. •°�a . �N.. W J`L 1 ti !'�.•1L �4 .� . -� .. M '� .. ... p.�yV. ` ^o .;o a - '.t .,�.. ^r+- �,t\ Kp - ,.I r i' f. ham .�.. a °' rr�t� �.*.,. 4,..w ?. • � �:• ,� ,.. _ .. -. ,. - ..,.. .,. w,,, "t �. �:. t -., r5 +_ (^; er 6'f.�.:,'.'S r�•,.r, �•'+ i 1'Y :.': Jpa. ., �. f. t r . :�4 k, a� Yt a. . - ., ,, .� k r a �. J ,�ti -; � '� s f! �.� �•� ,�: �•; .. a .fir.: a • - ;7�- wi'4'y�'y� t�.)��c• .t i2 !',.♦ �r`,�.. :�.' '` .'w, t '�'•i: r < .•. ,..',r .''.: + "..:r .ri. .,. • a� �'ra �l: A ;��r' +N Y ^ �1 :C"F•'4'i ti •t, : :Ilr:, •IY;t !I.. ,t7 �'.. �'.G tT Tr. Ir•. ' j ,. f �^ - ^�' ,y ?L , i .,.. .!�; v1. Y�.. M �. .l �f:i .�' , �� F�{4`: ,N R 'T It �.t: .�i�ti�+•+r l:� 51.- \a^'rC+r �� .l +t -./ .. • -fi. .,.( + i .��w: .�w ¢q 4. •�' .. . n:�.F.l;y. t1. .: 7,r.+a v�, g �,. .�., p r h .. « , r. y �� _ yy�,,� �y.�� 1Y(y M A .t. ^`µj `.:�. '�, •y,4 q1 MiJt .r Jr t}., Y.' yam• .$'.f Y ,. .Y .a W 4 �•,�a`1. �:' �., ;.+�:r }��ry .7. p .�^ •�:��a, ai 5. :vr• 1<t4•.a` ;if �,y� ;�,� .tip. 2 t �. •,,.?; �.. ; . r i - a' �,... 1n a � i�w .:,. .�,F' : �oy .Mr . :i++"J• `H'r`'` J�'r•t �. ^,cl;l � R��;:.:.:. r ' ! .tw ... •� ... ... .Y�.. }� a. ,. - r�. ft 1 a : } 1,�....�jy i./ �v, -. d:,AYi.y, vrk- 4r�f-'. • {rH'« 4r . .•W:A r,f;r '`.. � � y ,.fir . i + , r - e•s A A �RM r , ,.: I. .It�'�M ka[t, r ^ r,. i �"Ri�'^a, �gY?;6ji <�.��- ^ir,+C� y , yrt,a.:,rx 5+ 4 • �rl i+q- ' ^+-.. M,t �r�.t• -•^, +• � t �h A F �.. � +: i rot, •. t. , v w �. ,Yr ,�,i»} ,.,°, • i:?�':� c 7+ ' � ; '�'� °+ �;�f ° 5 Lip •"' ".v V;7t ,s � r4y / ly,:... �,. t .. >. t +.w ., 'Y. .�6 \. �,, a �9'?� r k!+� r l`r- /• * filk ,r'i ' trr .rrttr' F ^, aw . !' � «., fMt' Otra>` �... !�i +.7 .. :.• -.. - e r".- .sl, � ��,- :t.,' +. I.e #o �;. :r;._ rw.r.•r :1'. a�il�i�'. q:� `. it,e'k.er .C•Xx. :., .h 1>Q'F:: I. -�; , � ..ga+. �,. ,an <w!'`,�b' �, ;11� � 1 ? .t �•, � � * , � ti l;+� X 1 t yf"f� N .: S, a., ; S .; - ` c -,'r t; . t°t�+ "z. r qt':. a s r a:� H .. i. s . �,..'a• a -a : m .`••f'ii ^ . a �L n.p; » a a 1 k > '�� J .I..... :1 ' v6 ' s �i.,z ., : ;.4� t ♦ . Ytjr• • f,,�j ^f:� . •�e. ��. .",:1,, .,� :At. �.�.:. t ;n`:4 t � }.•ti. �' ? .'�r.^ - +•- f v -r v. � 4 .rc �:.� .,F`+„° ..� ,+ � FJ� `s.•" P s 5. r' ! k'' �. t• ,: +w. •i' ak., 1, .A s' t..i �� .Y. v t:'i.t �i'� .. ru, c.. ,w L�IJ,• tV. •.,� .. '� , Y �.l t'.IK 1 ,. .. '�iV.: � •4 � �, ^. .a / ♦ {.. ` L 1.� .. �y •- 1 � r : i " �,�r(t��_ T _ .. .•,..: *. k. :'� � A 7,f r .A .1•ti. ,.T• :, .t .'�•. M.. .r.,..•y: ... ,, �I;w k.��r; .'1 Y' � :r *,t♦.! .JIM•,' ? •�� /�. ' ?'�1ki •::`, � +ij} , n r t ,�:. , �; • `iS.k:rriti f ' Xt•� .A% '• ;: r.�� r1:i`:ti: k;.'+: :n y:hr4 �4 :: r� .s•e� .6,• »� �? t S, _r• i'p.i �: . .;� C p yy(� !j `:k•. ,f ,,, :� '�° ;+ {..;,• +` au .C,., - !k„ . , y ;.y. 1.'1 .ra.'. �. ' :d•.�t'lt. \�1;�/�l• •..�.�• �...I..:Q�... u:' : tW1"^�.` ..� :"Yt «•v ., „ •1 - .Y'.s..?�'.`: s. o ,`r„'1� ,. .: �. k?Af r � :.'e �. r . , . ! �.lr�. ,.d`,. s., a. .! . . "t` a•I' .�{ •j'i1 '�,,..: .'� . , a ... '�t- k'��. �s�il Lucille E. Aurelius City Cl er k 1830 East.County Road B Maplewood Minnesota 55109 De Ms . Aurelius We are property owners at 2222 McAfee Circle. We have received assessment notice for storm sewer installation. The..amount we have.:been assessed is.$500.00. We wish to appeal the assessment against our property P Y Our house is in a newer development. All of the proper storm sewer provisions were a part . of the development, None of the runoff water from our property will drain into the new storm sewers* Also there was no water draining onto. our property before the improvement. Why should we be penalized for the surrounding area? We paid for adequate storm sewers as a part of the purchase p.rice.of our new home. Thomas & Maureen St 2z / / � Z I C I OD r Co 0 V po f I Sb cs� �. / a ,-- G _ _ I J do G -s LAW OFFICES BRIGGS AN'D MORGAN PROFESSIONAL, ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAZIL MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE (612) 223-6600 FACSIMILE (612) 223-6450 WRITERS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER (612) 223 -6622 September 30, 1991 OCT RECEIVED o 1 1991 MP me ow �.Nw � �.:— J MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE 2400 IDS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS,. MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (612) 334-8400 FACSIMILE (612) 334-8850 Ms. Lucille Aurelius Maplewood City Clerk 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: HealthEast Financing Dear Lu: Action by Endors ed .ti^..,�,��.....�� Red I have been advised that the bond issue for the above matter may be as much as $26,500,000. Although this amount exceeds the approximate maximum amount set forth in the notice of hearing, we are satisfied that approval of this larger amount is permitted by law. Accordingly, enclosed is revised resolution to be adopted at the hearing setting forth the greater amount. Also enclosed is revised Consent Agreement which reflects the larger amount and makes other technical changes. Please do not hesitate to give me a call if there are any questions. Very trul yours, er eed PHS:mg Enc. cc: Ms. Mary Ippel \S TO: FROM SUBJECT.* DATE INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM City Manager Director of Community Development Tax- Exempt Financing-- HealthEast October 11, 1991 HealthEast is requesting City approval for $26,.500,,000 in,tax- exempt financing to refinance current debt.' The South St. Paul HRA will be issuing the bonds. Maplewood must also approve this financing since part of the financing is for St. John's Northeast Hospital BACKGROUND Council approved tax- exempt f inancing for St. John' s Northeast Hospital in 1982 and 1987 The St. Paul HRA issued the 1987 financing. Maplewood had to approve that f inancing because part of it was for the expansion of St. John's Northeast Hospital, DISCUSSION This project meets all the City's requirements for tax - exempt financing. HealthEast has not completed an application or paid an application fee yet for this financing. Mary Ippel said she would ask HealthEast to do this before the Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution and consent agreement to allow the South St. Paul HRA to issue $26,500,000 in tax - exempt revenue bonds for HealthEast., Approval is subject to compliance with the City's tax - exempt financing criteria (copy attached) and submission of a completed application and fee. mb\mem\HealthE . tax (section 3 ) Attachment: City Requirements for Tax - Exempt Financing REQUIREMENTS FOR TAX - EXEMPT MORTGAGE REVENUE FINANCING Your application must meet the following requirements for approval of tax- { exempt mortgage revenue financing: I . The project shall not require a significant amount of public money for City improvements if.the City Council determines that the site is premature for development. City improvements include streets and utilities. 24, The notes or bonds shall be for an issue of not less than $300,000, 3. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval. The City Council may grant a time extension if you show just cause. 4. Contractors doing work on projects funded in whole or in.part by tax - exempt mortgage revenue financing: a. Shall not discriminate in the hiring and firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, disability or the need for public assistance. b. Shall pay employees as provided under the United States Code, Section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.44. c. Shall employ Minnesota residents in at least 800 of the jobs created by the project. In addition, at least 60& of thpgp K I1 • Ar � employees shall be residents of the seven - county metropolitan area. Resident status shall be determined as of the date of the project's approval by.the City Council. However, if the contractor can- show that. these quotas are not poss ible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specific skills, the contractor may request a release from the City Council of the two residency requirements. These requirements shall continue for the length of the construction project. d. Shall be active participants in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. e. The above requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working . g on the prod ect . 50 You must use Mary Ippel, from Briggs and Morgan, as your bo counsel. 61 The project must involve an existing business that the City wishes to expand or a new business which the City wishes to attract. A busines i s the manufacture, distribution, sale, storage or making of any merchandise, real estate, produce, food, housing or services which will produce income for one or more individuals. An existing business is a commercial project that has operated for at least one year in the City. A. new _business is a commercial project which does not qualify as an existing business. a. Existing business criteria: The City will consider any expansion, relocation or rehabilitation of an existing business for approval. b. New business criteria: The City will only consider r new business for approval if it: (1) Offers at least 400 hours per week of new, year- around employment, or (2) Involves the rehabilitation of a vacant or scheduled to be vacated structure, or (3) Is within a designated development or redevelopment target area, and (4) Has a low potential for creating pollution. ?. The project must exceed minimum code requirements by including at least five of the following features into the project: Brick Building design should be a distinctive, nongeneric style. F 3 M A noticeable increase in the size and quantity of landscape plantings over what the.City normally req uires. Underground irrigation of all landscaping. Open space, other than required setbacks. At least 10% more parking than code requires. Walkway along street frontages. All parking stall widths at least ten All signs shall be at least 20% smaller or fewer than allowed by code 8. You must pay an administrative fee to the City f one percent of the bon y p d issue with a minimum of $6,170 and a maximum of $24,690 at closing. The City will credit the application fee against the administrative fee AGREEMENT I by signing this application, agree the following: 1. 1 have read and will abide by all the requirements of the City fo � y r tax - exempt financing. I will commit all contractors, subcontractors and any other major contributors to the project to all. segments applicable g pp to them. I am aware that failure to comply by myself or any of the above can result in cancellation of the resolution. 2 The above information is correct. 3. I agree to pay all costs involved in the legal and fiscal review of this project. These costs include the bond counsel and City Attorney, and all costs involved in the issuance of the bonds to finance the proj i ect . 4. I understand that the City reserves the right to deny final approval, regardless of preliminary approval or the degree of construction completed. Applicant Form Revised: 5 - 23 - 90 exemp.app Date 4 FROM BRIGGS MORGAN SP (FRI)10.11. 10:16 NO.6 PAGE 2 LAW OFFICES BRICIGS AND bsORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 4000 MIST NATIOXXX. R LN'rK BUIUDYNN O f, AJNT FAVY. MINNESOTA W101 TELSPIZCYX (6124 220-45000 FACSIMILE (OW) 223 _ 6400 W=T$It .S DrRZCT DIAL N?SMAZAt (612) 223-6620 October 11, 1991 a n%- .%zE.&ro=S O FFICz 4400 I D S CmgTzx WIN"N APOLIS XMMUSOTA 1 ELEFRON E ((111 334.8400 rAcsrx= tt9i$) 3" - 80W W. Geoff Olson Maplewood Planning Director 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: HealthEast Financing Dear Mr. Olson: The City of Maplewood is being asked to give halt approval to the issuance of $26,500,000 in revenue bonds (which may a single note) issued by the South St. Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority to finance, among other things, certain health care facilities which include, among offers, equipment (not exceeding $12,000,000 in costs) for the St. N ortheast Community Hospital located in the City of Maplewood. The. Internal Revenue Code requires that a public hearing be held in every jurisdiction which contains � facility wh;ch will be affected by the issuance of the bonds. The City of Maplewood is also being asked to execute a Consent Agreement consenting to the issuance of the bonds by the Hauling and Redevelopment Authority of the City of South St. Paul. The transaction is almost identical to the one that the City of Maplewood approved in 1987 except that the Hoiisj'ng and Redevelopment Authority of the City of South St, Paul, rather than the Housing and Redevelopment Authonity of the City of St. Paul, will issue bonds to finance the facilities in Maplewood. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippel M LI:mg HEALTHEAST RESOLUTION NO. 91- RESOLUTION RECITING'A PROPOSAL FOR A PROJECT AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT It is hereby found, determined and declared: (a) Under the enactment by the Minnesota Legislature of Sections 469.152 through 469.165 of the Minnesota Statutes, which is.cited as the "Municipal Industrial Development Act" the "Act"), the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of South St. Paul (the "South St. Paul HRA"), the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") and The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (the "Saint Paul HRA") are authorized to issue health care facilities revenue bonds to finance properties, real or personal, whether or not now in existence, used or useful in connection with a revenue - producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services; and (b) In enacting the Act the Legislature found that the welfare of the State of Minnesota requires the active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent, as far as possible, the emergence of blight and areas of chronic unemployment and to prevent economic deterioration; that new areas of employment opportunity for educated youth of the communities in those communities should be retained and created; and that the welfare of the State of Minnesota requires provision of necessary welfare and health care facilities, to the end that adequate health care services be made available to residents of the state at reasonable costs; and (c) Acting on the basis of the common powers of the City, the Saint Paul HRA and the South St. Paul HRA conferred by the Act, HealthEast (the "Borrower ") has proposed that the City, the Saint Paul HRA and the South St. Paul HRA enter into a consent agreement (the "Consent Agreement ") under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 pursuant to which the South St. Paul HRA, the Saint Paul HRA and the City would issue health care facilities revenue bonds (which may be in the form of a s i.ngl e note) (the "Revenue Bonds") to (i) f inance the acquisition and installation of hospital and related health care facilities, including land, building, improvements and equipment 22722 and other movable personal property acquired and to be acquired by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower, and located at, or used in connection with, existing facilities maintained by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower in the cities of Maplewood, South St. Paul and Saint Paul (the "Cities ") and (ii) to discharge certain indebtedness previously incurred by Borrower or a wholly owned subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower with respect thereto (collectively the "Project") as more fully set forth in the Notice of Hearing hereinafter described; and (d) The Borrower has proposed that the South St. Paul HRA issue Revenue Bonds for the purpose of financing the Project, including certain incidental expenses thereto and the fundin g of any debt service reserve, in an approximate maximum aggregate principal amount of $26,500,000; and the proposal calls for the Borrower to enter into a revenue agreement (the "Revenue Agreement ") with the South St. Paul HRA wherein the Borrower will be obligated to make payments under the revenue agreement at the times and in the amounts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Revenue Bonds and all costs and expenses of the Saint Paul HRA, the City and the South St. Paul HRA incident to the issuance and sale of the Revenue Bonds; and (e) The undertaking of the proposed Project and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance the cost thereof will further promote the public purposes and legislative objectives of the Act by providing substantial inducement for the continuation of the health care operations of the Borrower and its affiliates in the Cities; and (f) Neither the full faith and credit of the Cities or the South St. Paul HRA or Saint Paul HRA will be pledged or responsible for the Project or for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Revenue Bonds; and (g) The City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.154, Subdivision 4, did publish a notice, a copy of which with proof of publication is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City, City Hall, Maplewood, Minnesota, of the public hearing on the proposal of the Borrower that the South St. Paul HRA, acting pursuant to the Consent Agreement, finance the Project and the City did conduct a public hearing pursuant to said notice, at which hearing all persons who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal which notice, publication and hearin g are hereby in all respects approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City Council ") as follows: 22722 2 1. The City Council hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of Borrower that the South St. Paul HRA, acting pursuant to the Consent Agreement, issue the Revenue Bonds in one or more series pursuant to the Act, and pursuant to the Revenue Agreement upon such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to timeas necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Revenue Bonds in the total maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $26,500,00o.to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the Project. 2. On the basis of information available to this City Council it appears, and the City Council hereby finds, that the Project constitutes properties, real and personal, used or useful in connection with one or more revenue producing enterprises engaged in providing health care services within the meaning of Subdivision 2d of Section 469.153 of the Act; that the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 469.152, Minnesota Statutes; that the availability of the financing under the Act and willingness of the South St. Paul HRA, acting pursuant to the Consent Agreement, to furnish such financing was a substantial inducement to Borrower to undertake the Project, and that the effect of such financing, if undertaken, will be to assure that adequate health care services will be made available to the residents of the state at reasonable costs and will otherwise further those other purposes set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152, 3. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development, and subject to the final approval by the South St. Paul HRA, Borrower and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the ultimate details of the financing of the Project, 4. In accordance with Subdivision 3 of the Section 4699154, Minnesota Statutes, the City hereby authorizes and requests the South St. Paul HRA to submit, pursuant to the Consent Agreement, the proposal for the Project to the State Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development requesting approval; and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with the South St. Paul HRA in closing and to provide the Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development with such preliminary information as he may require. 5. Borrower has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by the State Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development will be paid by Borrower. 22722 3 6. The original purchaser of each series of Bonds, and Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, are authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project, to consult with the attorney of the South St. Paul HRA, the Borrower and the purchaser of the Revenue Bonds as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Revenue Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and to submit such documents to the South St. Paul HRA for final approval. 7. Nothing in this resolution or in the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the South St. Paul HRA for this purpose or authorizing issuance of the Revenue Bonds on behalf of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Revenue Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Revenue Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City. The Revenue Bonds shall recite in substance that the Revenue Bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Revenue Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 8. The actions of the City's staff in causing public notice of the public hearing and in describing the general nature of the Project and estimating the principal amount of the Revenue Bonds to be issued to finance the Project and cooperating with the South St. Paul HRA in preparing a draft of the proposed application to the State Commissioner of Trade and Economic Development, for approval of the Project, which has been available for inspection by the public in the office of the City Clerk, City Hall, Maplewood, Minnesota, from and after the publication of notice of the hearing, are in all respects ratified and confirmed. 9 The Mayor and City Clerk of the City are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and execute on behalf of the City the Consent Agreement for the Project in substantially the form presented to the City at this meeting. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1991. 22722 4 CERTIFICATE I, Lucille E. Aurelius, the duly appointed /elected, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached Resolution was duly adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, held on October 14, 1991, and is a true and correct copy of the Resolution adopted at said meeting and on file and of record in the official Minutes of said City Council. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said City of Maplewood, Minnesota, this day of , 1991. I do further certify that I am duly authorized to execute this certificate. Lucille E. Aurelius, [SEAL]. 22722 5 HealthEast CONSENT AGREEMENT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR.THE BENEFIT OF HEALTHEAST THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 1st day of November, 1991, by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, (the "HRA") and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, of the City of South St. Paul (the "South St. Paul HRA"), each a body corporate and politic organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1. Statement of Puruose and Powers to be Exercised Under the enactment by the Minnesota Legislature of Chapter 469.152 -165 of the Minnesota Statutes, which is cited as the "Municipal Industrial Development Act" (the "Act "), the HRA the South St. Paul HRA and the City of Maplewood are each authorized to issue revenue bonds, to make all contracts necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted to it under the Act and to enter into intergovernmental agreements relating to, among other things, the financing of projects under the Act. In enacting the Act the Legislature found that the welfare of the State of Minnesota requires the active promotion, 22716 s attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent, as far as possible, the emergence of blight and areas of chronic unemployment and to prevent economic deterioration and that the welfare of the State requires the provision of necessary medical and health care facilities, to the end that adequate health care services be made available to residents of the state at reasonable costs. Factors necessitating the active promotion and development of such medical and health care facilities within the City of Maplewood, the City of St. Paul and the City of South St. Paul (collectively the "Cities ") are the increasin g concentration of population in the metropolitan areas and the rapidly rising g increase in the amount and cost of medical and health care services required to meet the needs of the increased population. In accordance with the Act, HealthEast (the "Borrower" on behalf of itself and other members of the Obligated Grou p has proposed that the HRA, the South St. Paul HRA and the City of Maplewood enter into a consent agreement under the Act P ursuant to which the South St. Paul HRA would issue revenue bonds in the form of a single note (the "Revenue Bonds ") to Florida Local Government Finance Authority under an "interlocal a reement" g (the "Interlocal Agreement ") to (i) finance the acquisition and installation of hospital and related health care facilities, including land, buildings, improvements and equipment and other movable personal property acquired or to be acquired by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower and located at, or used 22716 2 w in connection with, existing facilities maintained by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower in the City of Saint Paul, the City of Maplewood or the City of South St. Paul, and (ii) to discharge any indebtedness previously assumed by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower with respect thereto (collectively the "Project"),, The undertaking of the Project and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds to finance the cost thereof will further promote the public purposes and legislative objectives of the Act by providing substantial inducement for the continuation and improvement of the health care operations of the Borrower and affiliates thereof in the Cities of South St. Paul, St. Paul and Maplewood. The powers to be exercised by the South St. Paul HRA under this Agreement are those identical powers conferred upon the HRA and the City of Maplewood in the Act and in particular the power of the South St. Paul HRA to issue the Revenue Bonds to finance the Project . 2. Method by Achieving Purpose; Manner of Exercising Power. The HRA, the South St. Paul HRA and the City Council of the City of Maplewood have each adopted a resolution approving the proposal and authorizing the issuance of the Revenue Bonds by the South St. Paul HRA pursuant to this Agreement, in an amount not to exceed approximately $26,500,000 to finance the Project. The South St. Paul HRA shall exercise the powers of the Act by adopting, approving and executing such resolutions, documents, 22716 3 w and agreements (including the Interlocal Agreement) as shall be necessary or convenient to issue and sell the Revenue Bonds and such other resolutions, documents and agreements as shall be necessary or required in connection with the loan of the p roceeds of the Revenue Bonds and the giving effect to or carrying out the provisions of the agreements and other documents under which the Revenue Bonds are issued and /or secured. Said Revenue Bonds shall not be. deemed issued on behalf of the City of Maplewood or the HRA, and accordingly the South St. Paul HRA shall be solely responsible for the issuance of the Revenue Bonds as herein provided and may take such action as it deems appropriate for such purpose without further action being taken by the City of Maplewood or the HRA. 3. Source and Contribution of Funds; Allocation of Funds. The source of funds to finance the Project shall be the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds, and, if necessary, a contribution to be made by the Borrower. These funds shall be allocated at the discretion of the Borrower towards hospital and related healthcare facilities located in the Cities, or provided in the revenue agreement under which the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds will be loaned to the Borrower and in a manner consistent with the Notice of Hearing attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4. Nature of Revenue Bonds The Revenue Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of the South St. Paul HRA payable solely from proceeds, revenues and other amounts pledged thereto and more fully described in the agreement or agreements under 22716 0 i which the Revenue Bonds are issued (the "Bond Documents"). The Revenue Bonds and the interest thereon shall neither constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability, general or moral obligation or a pledge of the full faith or loan of credit of the South St. Paul HRA, the HRA, the City of Saint Paul or the City of Maplewood, within the meaning of any Constitutional or statutory provisions. 5. Term of Agreement; Termination Unless otherwise provided by concurrent action of the South St. Paul HRA, the HRA and the City of Maplewood, this Agreement shall terminate upon the retirement or defeasance of the last outstanding Revenue Bond, and this Agreement may not be terminated in advance of such retirement or defeasance. 6. Amendments This Agreement may be amended by the South St. Paul HRA, the HRA and the City of Maplewood at any - time. No amendment may impair the rights of the holders of the Revenue Bonds, unless they have consented to such amendment in the manner provided for an amendment of the Bond Documents, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the.City of South St. Paul, has caused the Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its Chairman and Secretary; the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its Chairman (or Vice - Chairman) , Secretary, Executive Director and Director of Finance and Management Services; and the Cit y of Maplewood, Minnesota, has caused this Agreement to be executed on 22716 5 its behalf by its Mayor and duly attested by its City Clerk; all as of the day and year first above written. 22716 6 THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Approved as to Form: Assistant City Attorney By Its By Its Secretary By Its Executive Director By Its Director of Finance and Management Services Consent Agreement for the issuance of Revenue Bonds for HealthEast dated as of November i, 1991 by and between Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of South St. Paul and The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. 22716 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA (SEAL) By Its Mayor Attested: By Its City Clerk Consent Agreement for the issuance of Revenue Bonds for HealthEast dated as of November 1, 1991 by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of South St. Paul, Minnesota and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, 22716 8 THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA By Its Chairman By Its Secretary Consent Agreement for the issuance of Revenue Bonds for HealthEast dated as of November 1, 1991 by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority f the City ty of South St. Paul, Minnesota and The Housing and Redevelopment Authority the City of Saint Paul Minnesota y f ' and the City of Maplewood Minnesota, , 22716 9 . / AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE DATE: Assistant City Manager Action by Council: E n d o r s e d .,. � ... �,. �.... �. �.,. Modif i e d -, - -...- R e j e c t e d ,__ _ __._.._.. REQUEST FOR FOUR-WAY STOP SIGNS: HOLLOWAY AND McKNIGHT October 8, 1991 BACKGROUND At a previous meeting, the City Council approved a resolution requesting Ramsey County to study the intersection of Holloway Avenue and McKnight Road for the possible installation of stop signs. To date, the County has not installed the additional two stop signs on McKnight. Residents are still concerned about the safety of the intersection. Mayor Bastian heard that several serious bus accidents had occurred at this location, and he requested accident information. Chief Collins has provided the accident information for the last four and one -half years. (The information is attached). The Mayor requested that this item be placed on the agenda for further action. The City Council has two options: 1. Take no action. 2. Adopt a resolution which petitions Ramsey County to immediately install a four -way stop sign at the intersection. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review the information and take appropriate action. September 30, 1991 MEMORANDUM To: Assistant City Manager Gretchen Magli h From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. CollinsL,- Subject: Request For Accident Information Mayor Gary Bastian requested information on accidents that have happened at Holloway Avenue and McKnight Road. He was specifically concerned with a report that he had heard from a resident about three serious school bus accidents that had occurred at this location in the last few months. A computer check of this area was made, going back to January 1, 1987. The following accidents were noted: 11 -02 -88 Vehicle accident - vehicle hit a deer 12 -16 -88 School bus accident - icy packed snow, school bus rear ended a car, causing approximately $1,500 damage 08 -14 -90 Property damage motor vehicle accident - no injuries 09 -07 -90 Personal injury motor vehicle accident 10 -16 -90 Personal injury motor vehicle accident 10 -25 -90 Personal injury motor vehicle accident 11 -28 -90 Property damage motor vehicle accident 11 -29 -90 School bus accident - vehicle rear ended school bus, causing $70 damage These are the only accidents that we have recorded for this location, and no accidents have been recorded for 1991. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. KVC :js Mr. Dan Soler Ramsey County Traffic Engineer 3377 North Rice Street Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 Dear Mr. Soler: At recent city council meetings, two issues were presented by residents that concern Ramsey County roads. The.intersection of East Shore Drive and Frost Avenue was discussed. The request was for all-way p g stop signs. It was explained to the resident that both legs of the intersection are under, county jurisdiction. The city council took no p osition on the matter but did indicate they would pass on the concern. The second concern is pedestrian crossings on McKnight Road at Holloway and adjacent to Hillside Park, south of Holloway Avenue. All -way stop signs at Holloway Avenue and additional marked crosswalks were discussed. It was agreed to request Ramse County to look into pedestrian - crossing safety in this area and to take any action the county deemed appropriate. If there are any questions, please call at 770 -4552. Sincerely, Kenneth G. Haider City Engineer iw &Itial Opix)rtunity Elliploycr February 12, 1991 Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3377 North Rice Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55126 (612) 484.9104 Mr, Kenneth G. Haider City Engineer City of . Maplewood 183.0 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Divisions of: Engineering Maintenance Mobile Equipment Environmental Services .The Ramsey County Public Works Department has received the concerns addressed by the Maplewood City Council regarding two intersections in .the City.of Maplewood. The County investigated each of these concerns with the following results. 11 Frost Avenue at East Shore Drive A resident made a request for the installation of an all -way stop control at this intersection. Currently East Shore Drive stops for Frost Avenue. Traffic counts conducted by our department indicate volumes are not present at this intersection to warrant this type of control at this time. Therefore; the existing traffic controls will remain in place. 20 ` McKnight Road at Holloway Avenue The County has also conducted traffic counts at this intersection. Sufficient volumes were not present to warrant the installation of an all -way stop at this time. The existing traffic controls of Holloway stopping for McKnight will remain in place. The intersection currently has a crosswalk painted and signed across McKnight Road south.of Holloway. This is the location requested by the school for crossing of McKnight Road. If you have any'comments regarding either of these concerns, please give me a call. Daniel E. Soler, P.E. Traffic Engineer DES:ptd ;-r, t 1^ AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: BACKGROUND Mayor and City Council Assistant City Manager 4b - (A � *U4, PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT October 3, 1991 .Action by Council: :�ndorsed�� ej ected, The City Council conducted a special meeting on Monday, September 30th, at which the consultant presented the results of the feasibility study. Public comments about the study and the proposed P roject were also taken. At the end of the meeting, it was the consensus of the Council to schedule a discussion about the project at the next regular Council meeting, October 14th. DISCUSSION Three possible alternatives for the next step in the process are provided for City Council review and discussion. These alternatives can be viewed on a continuum ranging from terminating the project to beginning the process for design and site plans. 1. Abort the project A community survey was conducted in 1989, an advisory committee provided a recommendation, a feasibility report was conducted, and a special public meeting was held for citizen input. If the Council feels that enough information has been obtained, a vote to terminate the project could be taken. 2. Gather more information. Based on the testimony that was presented at the September 30th meeting, the City Council could request that staff, independent consultants, or the advisory committee gather more information about the proposed project. This additional information could include an evaluation of three smaller satellite centers rather than one central larger facility, alternative site locations, or more financial information from existing facilities over the next year. 3. Obtain preliminary architectural drawings and a construction cost estimate. This would be done through the Request For Proposal process. Staff would send out an RFP, interview otential firms , and present a recommendation to the City Council for award of the bid. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council discuss the information obtained to date and decide on the next step in the process. Action by Council: MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, From: Robert D. odegard, Subj Informational Signs Date October 3, 1991 Endorsed. Modif i ed, Rejecte Date �.�........,..._ City Manager Director of Parks & Recreatio In City Parks Introduct_ionn At the August 29, 1991, City Council meeting, a discussion was held with the Council regarding the cost of the installation o informational signs in the city parks.. The Council requested that we compile the costs of the project and return it to the Council for action. Background At a previous Council /Park and Recreation Commission meeting, a discussion was held in regard to use of city parks. At that time, one of the points included the need for informational signs in the parks. Staff has reviewed park signs in other communities and has re- pare p d the attached sign for consideration. The sign was reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission at their September meeting, g Attached is a list of parks and the number of signs in paren- theses where more than one sign would be in the park. A second attachment indicates the .information that would be p rovided on the sign. We have reviewed funding sources and at this time we are recom- mending that Commercial PAC Charges be used since this is g a new development for each park and is not a replacement cost. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council authorize the p urchase of new park signs with funding not to exceed $ from Commercial PAC Funds. T -� c City Clerk INFORMATIONAL SIGNS IN CITY PARKS (4) HAZELWOOD (4) MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS {2) HARVEST (2) VISTA HILLS (2) HILLSIDE (2) GOODRICH (2) AFTON HEIGHTS (2.) FOUR SEASONS (2) WESTERN HILLS (2) PLEASANTVIEW .GERANIUM SHERWOOD PLAYCREST EDGERTON KOHLMAN WAKEFIELD GLOSTER FLICEK GETHSEMANE ROBINHOOD GLADSTONE (5) UNDESIGNATED 40 TOTAL /SE/4C4 6A 76' ZO E.4�N i'�losy ' +o 3seA�H �oy.B�cA � � � 0 p a uuv�CJ sumwr MAW-- in ucwr BY PIRW Oft CRY N:P A"L.'�i1!'Y (OM. MC iwvw.00m . °2O� our OWU WHoUl Mmm AM O� (OP.D. Ste, SomV ft�o � v1p,6 oil sra��ro�t,[� �e �ers (olme sew �8- 7'v.'se� Mm*2) -�.�s nurse Of A 1 iu� ro � RIMORDS am ,. � - ore ova oo�v� OF DOG MUST ca.�aoa � near s (UP �o �o ��e�lto�n- mac, -� RAYING is rjoT PER re�et� ow a -reo� Leo teu�tac� orwe -cr�v apsm IN ee COMDWM of OWEM PLEAM 9%2 ue TRMWa TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: AGENDA REPORT Introduction AGENDA ITEM �— I City Manager City Engineer Eleventh and Gervais Avenues from Ariel Street to T.H. 61 Speed Limits October 7, 1991 Action by Council.° Endorsed -.–. Ito difi e c? Rejected —.- .. Attached is a letter from Mr. Patrick W. O'Brien requesting a review of the speed .limits on 11 th Avenue from Ariel Street to White Bear Avenue and Gervais Avenue from White Bear Avenue to Highway 61. These streets are within the Maplewood city limits. Background Mr. O'Brien's letter is fairly accurate and complete regarding the history on this issue. There is documentation from 1977 that authorizes specific speed limits. Three different projects in 1980 and 1989 have significantly changed the characteristics of the roadway. No speed studies have been done since completion of -the projects. For streets like 1 1 th and Gervais Avenues, state statute requires a speed study to be conducted before the commissioner of transportation actually sets a speed limit. Mn /DOT must set the speed limit in this situation. Recommendation It is recommended that the city council request a speed study and speed limit authorization from the commissioner of transportation for 11th Avenue from Ariel street to White Bear Avenue, and for Gervais Avenue from white Bear Avenue to T.H. 61. KG H ic Attachment PATRICK W. O'BRIEN, .F.S.A., E.A. ACTUARY & CONSULTANT PENSION & LIFE INSURANCE VALUATIONS 2759 HAZELWOOD AVENUE October 1 , 1991 ST. PAUL, MN 55109 BUSINESS: 770.3714 RESIDENCE: 777.4586 Mr. Kenneth Haider, Director of P u b l i c Works City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, , MN 55109 Re: Request for A Minnesota DOT Traffic Section Speed Study .on 11th Avenue /Gerva i s Avenue Between Ar i e 1 Street and Highway 61 in Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Haider And Other Parties Concerned: 11th AVENUE BETWEEN McKNIGHT ROAD AND ARI.EL STREET IN NO. ST. PAUL understand that on or about December 7, 1988p the Minnesota DOT Traffic Section conducted a speed study on Eleventh Avenue between McKnight Road and Ar i e 1 Street in North St. Paul, Minnesota. The result of the study was: 'Speed Limit Recommendations and Justification: 35 mph due to results of test runs and speed checks and roadway characteristics." .North St. Paul changed the posted speed -limit on this road from 30 mph to 35 mph shortly after the study was completed. (See enclosed dated 12- 07 -88). 11TH AVENUE FROM ARIEL STREET TO WHITE BEAR AVENUE IN MAPLEWOOD However, the portion of 11th Avenue in Maplewood between Ariel Street and White Bear Avenue remains Dosted at 30 mph. A member of the staff of the Minnesota DOT informed me this 30 mph speed 1 imit is unautho- r i zed. and i s c 1 ear 1 y ' i 1 1 ega 1. But nobody has the author . Y ,ty and /or the incentive to make the City of Maplewood comply with M.S. 1 69.14 if they choose to operate in v i o l a t i o n of the statutes suggest that you change the posted speed 1 imi is on th i s roadway f rom 30 mph to 35 mph at your first opportunity merely to stop breaking the law. .GERVAIS AVENUE FROM.WHITE BEAR AVENUE TO KENNARD IN MAPLEWOOD According to the "LOCAL STREET OR HIGHWAY SPEED LIMIT AUTHORIZATION' Z TION dated February 3, 1977 ( enclosed) the authorized speed limit on Ger- va i s Avenue from White Bear Avenue to a point 500 feet east of Kennard Street is 35 mph. This portion of Gerva i s does not appear to satisfy pp the requirements for a lower speed 1 imi t . It would appear that this portion of Gervais Avenue is illegally 9 Y posted with an unauthorized 30 mph speed l im i t . I suggest an immediate change in the posted speed 1 im i t from 30 mph to the legal 35. mph. p ACTUARIAL CONSULTING SERVICES Mr . Kenneth Haider, Director of Public Works Re:, Spe.ed Study on Gerva i s Avenue from Ar i e 1 St. to Hwy 61 October 1, 1991 Page 2 If there is concern for the special pedestrian traffic using t h i s roadway at certain times of the day, I suggest you instal 1 spec i a 1 s i gns 1 i ke 'they have on Ho l 1 oway Avenue i n f ront of Map 1 ewood Jun i or High School: "SPEED LIMIT 25 WHEN PEDESTRIANS ARE PRESENT Currently, there i s not a s i ng l e spec i a 1 s i gn except f or the i H ega 1 30 mph speed limit signs I b l i eve that the posted speed limit on . Cope Avenue between Wh i.te Bear Avenue and Hazelwood Avenue is 40 mph. l do not see that Gervais Avenue between White Bear Avenue and Kennard street is s i g n i f i c a n t l y different. GERVAIS AVENUE FROM THE MINN -DOT LAB TO HIGHWAY 61 IN MAPLEWOOD On September 30, 199 1 , there was not a single speed limit sign , in either direction, on Gervais Avenue between the Minnesota DOT Labora- tory and Highway 61, OTHER EAST -WEST ROADS I believe that the posted speed limit on Frost Avenue between English Street and Highway 61 is 35 mph. I believe that the posted speed 1 imi t on the east -west County Road B, County Road C, Beam Avenue, County Road D are generally 35 mph. Larpenteur Avenue west of Highway 12.0 is 40 mph. -Hollowa y Avenue west of Highway 120 is 40 mph. OTHER NORTH -SOUTH ROADS The posted speed limits on the north - south connecting roads are highly 9 Y variable. I believe McKnight Road varies between 30 mph and 45 niph within a mile of Gervais Avenue. White Bear Avenue varies between 35 .mph and 45 mph within a mile of Gervais Avenue. Of course Highway 61 g Y was reduced this summer from 55 mph to 50 mph. In Maplewood, even when the roadways are comparable, every time you go around a corner the speed limit changes by 5 or 10 mph. This kind of takes the fun out of driving around Maplewood. WASTE OF PUBLIC TIME AND MONEY I resent the fact that part of police budget and part of our court budget goes to issue "speeding tickets" to otherwise careful and good drivers who they catch in one of these "speed traps" . Enforc ' n i nac- curate and illegal posted s A g 9 p pe..d limits is i s counter-productive .and cannot really be called law enforcement. ' '. ' ' Mr. Kenneth Haider, Director of Public Works ' Re: Speed Study on (3ervais. Av�nua from Ariel 8t. to Hwy 61 October 1, 1991 ` Page 3 ' ` WASTE OF DRIVE T I M E ' ^ P e r s o n a l l y , | f in d i t very i r r i t a t i n g to be driving in the t r a f f i c _ lane.on Gorvais Avenue at the posted ' ' limit and have steady stream o f cars f u l } of g r o c e r i e s passing me on the r i g h t -hand o i d e . ' IN CONCLUSION ' Sinc e the statute places the speed study authority with the Minnesota DOT and since this roadway has been totally reconstructed and even re- � routed since 1 B77 , it would appear that the Maplewood City Council ` should pass a resolution requesting a proper speed study at this time. ` ` Please call or write if you have an y questions, ! ' ' . Sincerely yours, | ` Patrick # . O ' B r i e n ' (612)-777-4585 ' 275 Hazelwood Avenue _ M a p l e w o o d , Minnesota 5 5 1 0 S - l 1 5 8 195:pV'eed.LLL SPEED TONING DATE .� ..........�. k7. a By - a� 4 .�. _. _ _ was* 0100 ...0 ..�. 2 County Municipolit es S - 4 At f'.•4� • T ownsh * D S.T R E E T *OR ROAD ....... _ .......,. _ .... _ _ _ _ ._ ..– moss .. amm — ___ ......... sow ....... _ do...... • Ir ROM sor s..+ soon s..+ sr +.� �r10. �.� s..r a.. .r �... �.� �.� ses T Y �.� r� �.� .NEW w .wmmo 0. w w .w.A swe •rte a...r dp.w ...m am.. • w. 4 ROADWAY LENGTH some Ono to" _ _ _ Ono _ SHOULDER = TYPE. _ _. _ _ _ _ ..m WIDTH •• .we an. _ "mm On o& ea. _ m'w WIDTH som _ _ _ _ .._....., _ ..w _ amom TYPE_. *am ._ _. _........ am" ...... C ON Qt Y I O N .. �.. _ ... ; _...n. ... CONDITION " _ _ Ono '�. ALIGNMENT _ HORIZONTAL �1 rrn 6.5t ' 9.hu: 4 � .001e s..0 some w a10a .moss soon flows a.o anise .r s...• s.r s..M some VERTICAL Am "mm ft- �w w� aw..a "r ftow sme "i Gomm sow one 6 � w r+ ter+ sam • • • LAND USE Cast » d� L 7: .. ''�s.• -.'� •L VOLUME / S8 20 �nnn s.r 10.00 �� sw s..10 w AM" some •nna r "NOW .. s...10 s.r. ammo .00a some am mm s..n w WOO swo "nee emme emm soma smmm .non A , I D E N T D A+TA _ some *now s.... s..•s _ ... smim "O.... CROSS TRAFFIC _ ... — -- smom ... _8. 6 flow ...e .... TRAFFIC CONTRD �; act • n��1 .�-� �.�. ..m............ w Sam ....� .r w ft= one sass• *mom a s..e sane now ssw w. .r sawn 0000 _ r one aer some one ..e some coos. ...a A o r,•� � 1 o r� I©� EXISTING SPEED LIMIT _/... _ _ _ _.�.0" L.. _ ... 0. _ seem _ now ._e ... _ _ ... ..,.. ._. ' 00106 mow" 00100 .10. Me .n..o anon a.. ... 4-0 _ _ .m. 4101 ... .w1 ..� ... .... _ ... _ �- _ _ _ _ _ ... _ _ r _ �• .... T E 5 R P S rn • srm sn� sa.w r s.>. s..w 40M w coos► a+w see some ale • OWN= D • 1� r 3 S r�,o h� a-�• 6a14 � a� �'• DESIGN SPEED 3 MPA but cu rves a r � h od . S Recommen�� lions an J ut t ificx flion o 3•s m e S - t d ____ __ �4 �.�_ rG s� 7� ru ►� s ✓� f t � C-U 3 S �' S' CHECK 1 • L -., •. � ;. , - Gob ` 1 MHD 29213 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Page Pages CTUI I E T 0 91 N'l G 14 W L 0 C 11 L SPEED L I M0 T AUT.9-30911ZATION Cit of M lotjood Road *Authority t - - Date _ F`Q b:'1.iQ� 3, ��J►77 Road Name or No. C it Itx'cot a I n If-an3.0Ud- Termini of Zone: From An Voricriliod re -iey Date of 11V 1; 197 To- Request At Gus Kindly make the following changes ins ce • he p d limits on the above- referenCed section. Changes authorized rein are in accordance with Minnesota Hi hwav Traffic Regu thor�zed applicable subdivisions thec g lation Act, M.S. Chapter 169.14 and eof. 7 for hour botimun t110 !4toraec :4 on with cc G '140 ion wi t�� T�.• Cope �vozuso �ar.�d the a ox�» ,., i.• ,can fox 1�otrr b tw o tho► intersect, � z1tcx` �, with �`rodrick Ctrc�ct and the with 11010n Stroot,, �'", - O rAlea vor hour botm Qn n mint apeman tee 1}00 feet intoroaction with M� � ti�c�t of tha site cox Avenuci. Olcvt I�33. Entranco) an cjp1�s•o:it~�t a� d a mint , n �� o nt Went of tha intoraocticz with.itc► guar A ( L-* T .Vj t I •om, tranco) . A venue MALloa por }.cur iao rwcom too in.nt above -a-mnt ionod mint and � oft teiy J? Oo foot vr�t Of th© 3.nt or p (CU .1 d o o,1e� . aQCt�:oas with t�'liitc Boar 1�vonuo L"-d'arl to . trnot 1 10 Viil per ?.your batw ten tho interaoction with CoMeV Avenue and tba, - into rcootion with 1gnneh c Avenue. Cn�r0 Av'onu0 Milan 't7 4r w � u�r botwoen tbv intoraoctf.on with At.Z�ati iuto�rcoct�.ozx With �� i c�vonue tad the c wood Btroot. por hour botwocn tho i.n teraoctl on with w 11az :isitorr�oct�.os� with Lei � oiwood BtroQt and t ?ia �i o B� Avenuo. ..� failos por hour betwoon th© int oroQation with 1ol Strout and the iL, terooctjojj wi tli Craig JPiaco. (3) White - Road Authority (1) Pink • Central Office Traffic (1) Blue •District Traffic '''� lc Engineer Traffic Engineer for Road Authority use on y Date traffic control devices changed im leme � p sting this authorization 1 y � MHD 29213 STATE OF MINNESOTA / DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS L Orl NIGHWAY S.PEED LIMIT AUTNOPIzATIOPT Road Authority CRY of �� l owoo d Page 2 of_ " Pages Date 1r'eb 39 lyn Road Name or No., a ty S' =Oto in !'-ZPI left Termini of Zone: From DOCorI L --od Lolow Date of :ay 13 9 197b TO Request Aunt 1. 1 q � 7. 976 Kindly make the following chan in speed g �, p limits on the above-referenced section. Changes au herein are in accordance with 1�Zinncsota H ighway T g thorized l � g y affic Regulation Act, M.S. Chapter 169.14 and a pp c subdivisions thereof. "6 A ^A 2L iS � 0 C1 Vor Wei b Q t Wbl V n the in y ' oraocLiou with LarpaatocYr AvQnuo rid tho 112toraeat ion with Gervnin t4venUO0 "' �►'v!� .t.3 l i.V'O . uo por Imur betwoon or t Intor�at..o�. �,th B�o�,a � ) Imo , =try y trot exd a point � fact Oaf of � oroaotion p w�tt� .mr.ard Str"t. &�`► rlilc3 Ver hour be t w �.� oou tho � ovvormcntioned po tad VI-th Uldto rear Av=:O. th intercoat 11 4L i , M y. a+. +• 4 d.•+ a...+ J►..AMA►+.....+rti..yw�a.I11 • i V rya Vor Lour between the �.nterr�ootiaa with frost Avonue and tho int ors , G tl o wi lZom Avenuo . t., IICoa► �r lzc�ux� b�C�r p con Vi o in'toraoo tion wit ti I3mm Ave nuo and tho a • 4 with Gou ty road �� .titoxa. a Av=uo far haux betweQn tho Intorcoction with �.t3tnxac�ot �n with �h•i t o �oc�r 1lv�onu�o �d the h A.�rjol. Ztroot. �~ Cdloa Vor hour botwoen tha inter Interaection o�ticm with Cht h� J�ar c�nd tt�o With B0�.1airo Av cnuv. tt�r��! + rtroot er • Maur botuv3 the ant ormocticm r+..th 1t:�.m��:42 �.�.� �f3 SltduY" AV�L3UQ End � point 4t CSOUth cx tho aOrc mnnt ioned i.nter13 (Ond - Gt�O� Q� �3t�''CQt� (3) White • Road Authority (1) Fink • Central Office Traffic (1) Blue • District Traffic Engineer ' - ----------- 'Traffic Engineer I��oad Authority use oiiIy Date traffic control devices changed irn le • g p meeting this authorization ''f • TE Oct. 15 1976 SOON am" f1 Y B o Hall l - G o B ovy ..,. shoo . SPEED ZONING • COUNTY OR MUNICI LITY MA PLEWOOD SEND _ mono _ _. came .• _ _ R a.ms ey STREET OR ROAD w. "4Is AVENUE __.._._.— — •--- - -,... _own on- Barclay St, Vihite Bear Ave. FR OM _ .... r*. Sam* w� ._ r_ CONGO MIND TO .._ 40@mw _ .._ w • row _ 0.9? mile - Gravel ROADWAY L EN.GTH owns _ _ _ _ _ .. SHOULDER = TYPE. _ ..n 4110040 . _ 41111=5- _ _ _ _ ._ 24 -30 .feet 0 - 4 feet WIDTH mm.a...__4a. a..._ WIDTH____`._...._..._._ TYPE ^ B OWNS _ ...1 CONDITION Fair ... r.. Same _ -wows Fair • ►. C 0 N D I r I 0 N a. =me •mom r awn 41101110 come ALIGNMENT" = HORIZONTAL Straight • Sam 0-� somm Slalom Samoa am" alum 4MENO OWNS maw Gomm f� "me ammeamm, %won Gomm w� Sam" Level to Gently Rolling VERTICAL ..._ a� � 4000 ...e r.a w OPENS ...n r b.a awn r.b 6w soup 40101110 e. r_ mom so" r.. e. 411.e ram r_ OWNS ..AND USE Residential to Qpen- Commercial VOLUME ,,,,,,123 ,.- JOQ,_ ._„ ,,,. C I D T DATA .,...�: _.:.�..... L..... _ .... _ CROSS TRAFFIC Lich t t o U-81IvY , .,, mom=* room rrrr.r•r ..� r�.•��rrn�i�rr•� TRAFFIC CONTROL, Stops at Hazelwood St. & Thite Bear Ave. ww ■•u...�..+.�r r....r MIND anr s..• "am ft.• 4.m 4 � •..m GROUP r rw OWNS o_ so_ OWNS MINIS we _r guano sm.o Or _ ••m .o+ 3011PH (Unauthorized EXISTING SPEED LIMIT .a.... o _ cam one SIM ao.. 4~ w _ .. • 411. use sow Y ... ..e allow SSW Sonow own 40ow 4000M 0111110 VON& ar r_ _16 400vft am" r ... ... ... ..� ... ._ r Now ... ft� .� .. soon one ! F=�9r T R p 30 •- 35 MPH • v+ n' N FL T so� INWAM 4=WAO alm-M Gas= amom o� emom qmomo d� 4mme 4� OWING 40100 qwmo SEES 4� 4� Oman, 0 dome ..�. < r•1 B A R C t AY r SPEED CHECKS LOCATION F .z p �' = �` ' < n Z _B � � z an tt N A Z EL WOOD ST INSUFFICIENT VOLUME , `� � �N Lj .AA I S T Gf. R Ni _ rn "7. WrNNAPO .... o —A o � r FLANDRAU S T. AN DR A11 m �iEh1 ST BITTERSWEET LA rn 4 0 - - ( � SOUTHLA WN pA. In Panama °' ` /! l I - Z I i Ov K �"E ��. vANDYKE A • 47a po x 0 N = C,I+ ►+QZEI WHITE t3FAA C G PG p]1 2 r ....,.._._.,• r 1 A WSW RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MU,.,�rom P.Ircla St, to J 00 feet east of Kennard St. & • spoo rr ..� .Y a.. .•.� s w _a r_ "One rem wr awn a+•a own 6~ ann, 35 MPH from lest location to White Bear ' Ave. r.m. ` Samoa 4000. Q..Sm, "Wour ar/ a..• a.. 40.0 a.-m wom f000m •.a aw a.w w •ro■. a� awr a..r ar a..a w■r a.a Samoa Goo* * f roa OWNS now mom rMM r�o ..a a.� arm• �� an. •.� aw.r *NOUN* •.om a.w• r..• aoom 40.-04 A some war aoa o r an •moom r..om o . room meow •r. 40 • •mm.• 40000 _.• some OWN ap_ wr rah Gomm w.. rw Oman r a.. •.. •.� r l��•�; ` '\ ! TS . .rte am w. • ..y 0-00 . • • • r . . • • - .r..+ AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: Action by Counci.1: City Manager Endors ed,...-,—. ... Modif i ed .,- City Engineer Rej ected. County Road B, Rice to 1200 Feet East, Project 89- 05— Easement Agreement DATE: October 7, 1991 Maplewood entered into an agreement with Ramsey County to construct a section of County Road B east of Rice Street. One of the provisions of that agreement requires Maplewood to acquire easements for the work. Background Several easements have been acquired by the city for construction of the project. One easement remains unresolved. The easement in question is for a drainage ditch south of County Road B on the undeveloped land east of Cub Foods. Good faith negotiations with the property owner have taken place over the last several months. The value of the proposed easement has been determined by a city appraiser and reviewed by the city attorney. A proposed cash settlement of $25,000 is acceptable to the property owner. In addition, the owner wishes to reserve the option to relocate the easement at a future date. The new location would be the result of a site planning process for the undeveloped property. Recommendation Authorize staff to prepare and execute an easement agreement with a cash payment not to exceed $25,000, and further, to increase the Project 89 -05 budget by .$25,000 to be financed by special assessments. Budget Impact The existing, budget for this project is $7,500. This action would increase the budget to $32,500. Based on discussions with the city attorney, it would be appropriate to recover the cost through special assessments. KGH ' I ,- ," T" I E LA 3 SE SCY RIP RAP \A ' c 3 ' ;•�,.` j � \. �, TIL LAST 3 SE • /---- INSTALL SALVAGED ' ;:..�., FENCE I NV S 7 r!•�� ;8 x 8 x 2,'T t .r f ° ....$ 44 LF RCP g •� �� .•- ��ti CLO (CD 2. 0 % Vt ... ............ ......... man ` r• !. w ' ..... �...� ....•.... Lo .. 1NSULA TE...BET- WEEK..- CATCH. BASIN ..... ... ................ ATERMA IN �................... 64. + 65 66 3.8 LF -15 RCP 15.48°/ . . • ..• .. .... ..... ... •,ti1'• .H,.Y!• . �ti1Y• .ryvyti .I V.4Y\.\V • ' r..A .,.,�, • • \ ��.� 4 c a .., .__. BUR _�.. --- 1 511 100 LF - 18" RCP f ...._ 07.51% ••. ••i •1•• +.•..�•..•ti••...•••..•.••....► •V •• \. ..•.. �� Ic— do— F? T �.:f..� ;� 24 L �F N •� 5 •��. R C . R .... o .......... - C B H 'MOVE ` CBH ..... I f - : :: M H H.2 ..•.F 15 RC P� co `.. TOP BERM t--- U R EM OV Ems. w `n or 91 a.. N G R �..::.�. Q + dS cv DRI ? 1 / Y! W 140 % i .. 8CY RIP �-- m ST . _ RAP Z : R •, i O, . ED'. FENCE } i ` .... .: :� —, :1. .......... T- 3 MEMORANDUM .lotion by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Endorsed, SUBJECT. Lot Coverage Request odi LOCATION: Ivy Avenue and Mayhill Road Re . OWNER Ed Cave and Sons, Inc. -° APPLICANT: AccessiBuilding Corporation DATE: October 2, 1991 INTRODUCTION The applicant is asking for City Council permission to build a double dwelling that would cover more than 30% of the lot area. Code limits the building coverage on a lot to 30 %. The proposed double dwelling would have an area*of 4,798 square feet or 32.6% of the lot area, 30% equals 4,416 square feet. The proposed double dwelling, therefore, is 382 square feet or 2.6% over the allowed building coverage. This double dwelling would have side -by -side units, one- story high. Each unit would be a home for three handicapped persons and one care giver. (Refer to the applicant's letter on page 8.) BACKGROUND September 9, 1991: The City Council changed the code to require that the building area cover 30% or less of the area of a lot. The City Council may approve a larger building area if they find that it would not affect the Character of the neighborhood. September 24, 1991: The Community Design Review Board approved the building plans, subject to the Council approving this lot coverage request. (See the minutes on pages 10 and 11.) DISCUSSION The purpose of a lot coverage requirement is to require a minimum amount of yard area. The lot coverage of this double dwelling would not be consistent with the character of the neighborhood. The buildings with the largest foundation areas in the neighborhood cover 1,632 square feet. One of these is a single dwelling and one a double dwelling. The average home in the area covers about 1,441 square feet of the lot. (See the map on page 5.) The proposed double dwelling would cover 4,798 square feet of the lot. This is 3,357 square feet more than the average and 3,166 square feet more than the adjacent double dwelling. The proposed double dwelling not only covers more lot area than other homes in the neighborhood, but it is also larger in size. The average home in the area is 1 -1/2 stories, with a total floor area of about 2880 square feet. The proposed double dwelling would have 4,798 square feet. The.City has at least two other double dwellings for the handicapped, at 2030 -32 and 2040- 42.Beam Avenue that meet the he City s lot coverage requirement. Each of these two buildings g cover only 4264 square feet and are on 29 lots. This results in a lot coverage of only 15 %. The applicant should reduce the size of the building or find a larger lot. RECOMMENDATION Deny the request to cover more than 30% of the lot area, because this double dwelling is not consistent with the character of the neighborhood. CITIZEN COMMENTS I sent questionnaires to the 27 surrounding property owners within 350 feet of this lot. There were ten replies. Three were in favor, two had no comment and five .objected. Those in favor live on Mayhill Road and those opposed live on Farrell Street. In Favor 1. It is a nice building and a good piece of property. (The Kondors at 1265 Mayhill Road) 2. I feel there are not enough homes built with specific needs of handicapped persons. I would feel it.to be a privilege to have this type of home in my nearby area. It would also be a good experience for the children in this neighborhood. It may keep them from being so prejudiced toward handicapped individuals. (The Dinzeos at 1246 Mayhill Road) Objections 1. The size of the duplex should not exceed code. (Two replies from the Pearsons - mobile home park owners and the Emers at 1249 Farrell Street) 2. This building is 'out of phase with surrounding area and would lead to another of the same in the area. This property should be developed as planned and as is the norm for the neighborhood - single family residences. (The Kronholms at 1259 Farrell Street) Staff Comment: The City has zoned this property R -2, which allows double dwellings. 3. The building is too big we going to be treated do the building right. .Mayhill like the other whole area off balance Street) for the lot. If passed for them are equal? Why not buy the other lot and Also this building should be facing homes. Facing Ivy would throw the and looks. (The Adams at 1262 Farrell 4. See the letter on page 9 from Elizabeth Gyspers at 1300 Farrell Street. te\duplex2.mem (section 24 -29) - mb\mem\duplex.lot Attachments 11 Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Front Elevation 5. Applicant's letter dated September 6. Plans date - stamped August 16, 1991 19, 1991 (separate attachment) NoR rH sAI r PA UL ' i 29 68 !i9 ... ,...... MOLL AY AV 1 20 .. ........... .. ..... ...... .................. . ..... . . . ................... Cl Hillside W P* -j F- } R I AV = CLE W W 3 ABC XN16H T L IV W p , `A R R E 3Q NTEVR AV W G ott •.! ° Q T28N, R22W. o IDAHO AV c 14! 0 �C 23 24 Y �� O A A ( 1) CURR IE ST W R A AV 2 ( MYRTLE LE CT LN / My A EL 5 P P RE CA DR (2) R r ''f / PINE TREE DR 3 4 -- --� 4 BIRCH VIEW OR tl P ! . ... DR !!�• 8E LANA''; OAKNILL 6 PINE TREEDR G . _ _ 6 BIRCH TREE DR / ANMLOPE lWY ANGE ? ROLLING HILLS DR B AMSERJACK - LA 3 BEAVERDALE RD Ail /CK Y / A IVY -- / / A1N: 4 BOBCAT LA ELMEART L.A 8 COUGER LA •--- r - - - - j 68 ` � E '• . 4 W UADVI 4 HONTMORNE ' : 31 68 ' N ST OER�► o J ,Bd�O r MAG NO AV W � LOCATION MAP 4 N 4 Attachment 1 i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W" W R3 Z W a MENEM a 0 0 WEEMS moo w 11632 .., ■■ J Q 1276 1,442 Q 1299 1300 8 1266 1,352 1256 11552 1289 11262 1,4918 1279 . 1 47 k!'1265 1269 1,632 � UJ 96072 1 259 Q uj 6 � ■ W ui � 1249 (31252 Co Co � Z J ■ ■ Z -� ■ W ui � Ix i ■ 0� i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W" cc IMM R3 Z W U ■ wlk1M�M i�p � ■ L , t wl- , M --- I - -- - . -1- - - ---. - A I -- - A EAST MARYLAND - } - I PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP � FOIINDATION SIZES Attachment 2 IN SQUARE FEET Q L NJ 5 W Z W a MENEM a 0 J Q 1276 1,442 Q 1266 1,352 1256 11552 1246; 1,4918 cc IMM R3 Z W U ■ wlk1M�M i�p � ■ L , t wl- , M --- I - -- - . -1- - - ---. - A I -- - A EAST MARYLAND - } - I PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP � FOIINDATION SIZES Attachment 2 IN SQUARE FEET Q L NJ 5 SITE PLAN ttachment J IN c+ C+ 0 fD c+ 3 J C- O burr Spero 6. MONO �001,w, ` . � 1 1 +r. !�S!'C'±�'!— • If, -L ' �•. '. .� `... Sr. . !� w•. , . • . •. t ♦ �. �.y �1•. �' ,'T �� •. .i �%'• 16 ».. ! 1. �. l� 1. }1��, �, I �� ::i(' "iL .!! "`�I !�i: Ai s 7i NOR AccessiBuilding C Orp oration low 270 Rosedale Tower 1700 W"t High"Y 9b St. Paul, MN SSt 13 Business (612) 828 -0606 Fax (612) 628�6"l wrqrlflv� Se ptember 1 g 1991 City Council City MEVlewood 1 830 E. Gauntry Road B MlapleMVOOd, MN 66109 RE: Construction of a slab can grade duplex Dear Board Member; A=e ssiBuIlding Corporation Is the construction department of The . Co mmunity Hom e Program, a provider of housing fbr the handicap. Design of Handicap residences requires single lovel oonstructiom Handicap design also requires an Increase in floor area due to the size of a w hsel chair and the area for manoeuvreing, The design before you, was based on ft ow of the user and the city of Mapiewoods set lock requirements. During the application process, the city adopted a 30% lot coverage ardinanoe, This request fear. variance is based on the tinning of this ordinance and the additional space required for the user. Respectfully, Michael Jordan W:ch �618 Attachment 5 Elizabeth M. Gysbers 1300 Farrell Maplewood, MN 55119 777 -8271 September 24, 1991 Tom IIcstrand Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 E County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Bear Mr. Ekstrand: .Thank you for your letter dated September 10, 1991, regarding the proposed building f a side-by-side duplex at the g y p e northwest corner of Mayh�ll Road and Ivy Avenue which is to be used as a group home for six handicapped. As you discussed, the physical size is too large for the lot as the area building codes dictate. I sonall f eel per y ee that the area is not large . enough - -from an ecological standpoint --to be acceptable. Should this building be allowed to be built as proposecL we are opening ourselves --and our children - -up to severe future ecological ramifications. Please, instead of allowing this infringement of the code, can't we look to the future and keep the code as it stands or even consider �g a good look at ti Lenin the ratio . ,� g restrictions. I am confident that the corporation can find a piece of grope with a much better suited lot size which would not contribute to the already existing overcrowding that we all face. A major reason for my purchasing home in this area was the g Y openness that the lot sizes afford I cannot stress n enough that I feel this is a infringement of m ri g h ts as a . . y Y owner and also as an ecologically concerned individual. I feel that proposal will affect m home in the g reatest de y gr ghee because the end of the building would come so close to m backyard. y Thank you for allowing me to respond to this proposal. Please feel free to contact me at any time regarding this property. Sincerely, '' t A r Elizabeth M. Gysbers Attachment 6 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEAOOD COMMIINITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 24 1991 I. CALL TO ORDER airman Moe called the meeting to order at 7 g.m. 2 . ROLL CALL Donal Moe Present Marvin Erickson Present Michael Holder Absent ' Marie Ro inson Present Bruce Tho son _ Present Scott Wasi k Absent 3. APPROVAL OF NUTES a� August 13, 1991 Boardmember rickson moved ' a ' pproval of the minutes of August 13, 1991, as subm ' tted .; r� Boardmember Tho son seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, j' Thompson 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Thompson move, / approval of the amended agenda, deleting Item 6. c. Single Dwel - g Setback Increase- Lakewood Drive, South of Snowshoe Lane, Boardmember Erickson s.'conded Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson 50 UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unf i 'ished business, 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Ground. S', n - Presentation Church, 725 Kennard Street Bob Re' tad, representing Presentatio Church, explained plans p p for t s ground sign proposal. Boar member Robinson moved approval of t sign sketch dated Sep ember 16, 1991, for the Presentation urch ground sign along Ke nard Street. The applicant must apply r a sign permit. oardmember Erickson seconded Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson b. Duplex - AccessiBuilding Corporation, Iv Avenue and Ma hill Road Y M hill Jordan, of AccessiBuilding Corporation, discussed the 300 maximum lot coverage code requirement. The Board discussed the sizes of other dwellings in the area. Mr. Jordan said he designed the dwelling to face Ivy Avenue to fit the lot most Community Design Review Board Minutes 9-24-91 -2- effectively in order to meet the City's setback requirements. Mr. Jordan said the proposed driveway area is wide enough to. allow a vehicle to back out of the garage and turn around before entering Ivy Avenue. Elizabeth Gysbers, 1300 Farrell Street, an adjacent property owner, said this proposed dwelling is too large for the lot and, if built to face Ivy Avenue, it would sit too close to her property line . Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the site, architectural and landscape plans. date-stamped August 16, 1991, for a duplex on the northwest corner of Mayhill Road and Ivy Avenue. The applicant shall: (1) Repeat this review after two years if construction has not begun. (2) Replace the property irons of the adjacent lots if removed by the construction. (3) Restore and sod the boulevards if damaged by the construction. (4) Install addresses on each dwelling unit. (5) Not build elevated decks on the rear of the building or build roofs over the rear -yard patios. (6) Get approval from the City Council to build this duplex which exceeds the required 30% lot coverage maximum by 2.6 %. If Council does not approve this request, the applicant shall reduce the building size so not to exceed 30% lot coverage. Staff may approve minor design changes. The Board must review major changes. (7) Submit cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work not completed by occupancy. The amount of escrow required shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The City Attorney must approve an agreement granting the City permission to go on the land to complete any unfinished work. The property owner must provide this agreement. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson VISITOR PRESENTATI There re no isi.tor presentations. ;� F 80 BOARD P SENTA �_ a Boardmember Thompson re ted on the August 26, 1991, Council meeting. Action by Council: MEMORANDUM R c j o c t e d ._._....,n....� Dat e -.. TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Revision of Conditions and Time Extension LOCATION: Hillwood Drive, East of McKnight Road PROJECT: Hillwood Oaks Number Two DATE September 6, 1991 INTRODUCTION Marcel Eibensteiner is requesting that the Council approve a one - year time extension for the Hillwood Oaks Number Two preliminary plat. (See his letter on page 8.) Staff is proposing several changes to the conditions for approval. BACKGROUND August 28, 1989: The City Council approved a preliminary plat for Hillwood Oaks Number Two, subject to several conditions. .August 27, 1990 The City Council approved a one -year time extension for this preliminary plat, subject to the original conditions. DISCUSSION Mr. Eibensteiner expects to have a final plat for this development in about one year. Staff is recommending several changes to the preliminary plat approval. site Grading The City Engineer is recommending that the Council require that the developer do the final grading for all the lots with the street construction. This will allow the City to establish a drainage pattern for these lots. While this grading would result in removing many of the trees, the developer would eventually have to remove many of them anyway to do the grading for the houses and street. Water main for the South Oaks Addition The City Engineer is requesting that the Council require the developer to install an eight -inch water line in McKnight road from Hillwood Drive to Teakwood Court. St. Paul provides water service to the Teakwood Court lots now. The City is negotiating with St. Paul to buy their water wholesale. If successful, Maplewood would need to extend a water line to Teakwood Court or pay for a meter at'the intersection. The meter would show how much water Maplewood is buying for these lots. Installing a J- Y water line would be cheaper The City Engineer would prefer to have the developer install this line, rather than the City. RECOMMENDATIONS Approve a one -year time extension for the Hillwood Oaks Number Two preliminary plat. This extension is subject to the developer completing the following conditions before final plat approval: (I have underlined the new language and crossed out the deletions.) one 032=33 Wank an" on:33 2. Move the lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block One slightly to the east. This is so the rear corner of these lots meets the rear corner of Lots 5 and 6, Block One, South Oaks Second Addition. 2e Deed Outlot A to the ,property owner to . the south. If this owner does not want Outlot A. the developer shall combine Outlot A with Lot 5, Block 2. K 3. A Rroval by the City_ Engineer of final grading, utility_ drainage, erosion control, tree¢and street plans before any further _grading or construction occurs. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and sediment Control Handbook. 40 Approval by the Director of Community Development of a tree plan. The Director must approve this plan before any grading, begins or the City approves the final plat. r �ww 5. Approval by the City Engineer of a signed developer's agreement and escrow for any uncompleted public improvements and tree planting recjuired by the City. This agreement shall include, but not be limited to: The installation of a street light at the intersection of Hillwood Drive and McKnight Road. The exact location and type of light shall be subject to the City_ Engineer's approval. The removal of the temporary cul -de -sac for Hillwood Drive and the construction of a permanent.Hillwood Drive street section (curb, gutter, etc.). This is to include the restoration of the temporary_ cul -de -sac area to an acceptable ggrade . with a grass surface. The installation of an eight -inch water main for the South Oaks Addition. Fencing around the storm water pond. 6. The developer shall complete the final grading for all lots along Hillwood Drive with the construction of the street and utilities. The Cit n gineer may require retaining walls in areas with steep slopes (those exceeding 3:1) -and in those areas to save large trees_ kr \memo22.mem (1.2-28) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Hillwood Oaks Number Two preliminary plat 4. Letter from Eibensteiner 5. Letter from Samstead F61 MCA UPPER AFTON RD c O, 21 LL- - j Of iZI :j tK � 6 °tip e Gt 39 ° LOWER w 4A- Cre st vkw LONDIN o LA Pk POND w� vN Rp 41, AV 00 39 -- PO a e z LA �' N 120 (1) MARNIE ST J o� (I) a 1) (1) POND AV o v o Cr EKING ��AV a dDAY } 0 tMAILAND RD CIR o p V/s/o _ p o cn Hills �. , 3 W Pk � 3 TEAK- W TEAK- S WOOD DR Q- �..� Y . W h W O H 00 T OAK - W IDLE DR C E ST � FOR Cr do ILLWOOD tAi Cr o OAKRIDGE LN v a /?IN ZZ FDR iko- 2 o LINWOOD AV 0 T. 28 N, R.22W.' .. % O S! 1 +S_ Q AV CIN 0 7� O S.14� S.13 A D CT D HL DORLAND } RD -J Mlni Pk a Cr Cr 8 z TIMBER TIMBER LN , PHY I S C Q cn Q R.r DR VA L,C• Z (3) Q Cr VIEW AV w w �I) cn ( H I GHWOOD (n Q AV ° 74 494 Cr �- .L 74 MAMIE ° ,Z. `o IE A Cr w b NEM - ? ITZ AV uj SOUTH $ v _ :::: CRES 3 SOU - THCREST AV o :::: AV OAK a H TS J �` Pkes , V air wo w L N � � Pit � L A p Gt �' 44ow SNO B SC H Fish Creek $OXWOOD AV Pk Lake LOCATION MAP 5 Attachment 1 E , — A4 '.Str4 06 .c 401 2 5 3' /o/ r O X.40 104 41 s 104 ` is O) O S, o 2 4 (r Co9p a a a 30- o � 1 � t t,r �;,) 3 1••, 0 25 13 1.4.8• I � w 1 r 103-07 j9S. 73— cc 1 _ p 0 2 0 Z U H r ' °' 3 4 1 7 f 7.34- h .r QoA t �C ` • r n � � o , j `s COURT z 5.04 °` �� 0 T 1�r • N 3 /'� p _ ,�,� 9.85 �. ^ 4 t3 c W S , �. -• • A 14 t 7 5 to) 10 as to ••; , 4 0 •� 1 o 4 , ... 0,5 �'�` �. ,, rr OAKRIDG E DI . `�;:. .;.•.: ::• ;:; :•:•:: %:•::titi•::•::•:•:•:::.,., ti's' ✓:. �► LL '� •v •:. 7 V 1 O .. .9' X41 (3� 40 0 ; N Lo , `~ (Coy) : a ('°) ' 6 0 S 3 c6 3) <�tJ � �; E Z y 0 •� - ' s , t PROPERTY LINE /ZONING �s MAP Attachment 2 N 1 It j • It ! 11 � tl 1 t r_ ! �t 1 v S t ,i I j ll.imr•� i �ih i It I i1 Q MAY 0 5 689 b:ILL:'h.o ) OAK:i NO.1 4. r HILLWOOD OAKS N0.2 Attachment 3 4 N • t • i ire i 1 i - i h . • j i A �N h . I i i L j 1 TEAKWOOD _ do * COURT 1 �t • li l+ h !t '� 1 •� I 1; . 1 T 1 0 /6 1 It j • It ! 11 � tl 1 t r_ ! �t 1 v S t ,i I j ll.imr•� i �ih i It I i1 Q MAY 0 5 689 b:ILL:'h.o ) OAK:i NO.1 4. r HILLWOOD OAKS N0.2 Attachment 3 4 N ROYAL OAKS July 8, 1991 City of Maplewood Attn: Mr. Kenneth Roberts 1830 E. County Roa B Maplewood, MN. 55109 Mr. Kenneth Roberts: The preliminary Plat of Hillwood Oaks No. 2, expires on August 27, 1991. I wish to apply for an extension of one year. Enclosed is my check. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Marcel Eibensteiner ME /dms Encl. �D 3490 Lexington Avenues Suite 100 • Shoreview, Minnesota 55126. 483 -5518 • FAX 483 -5642 8 Attachment 4 t y Jul 30 1991 Y 4 XMASCA6 r:,WGXTqE3E: lr*ZG, X=ce J � SUITE 145 - 1221 FOURTH AVENUE EAST SHAKOPEE, MN 55 612- 445 -7993 Mr. John F. Bannigan, Jr. Maplewood City Attorney 409 Midwest Federal Building 50 East 5th Street St. Paul, NIIJ 55101 Dear Mr. Bannigan: I understand that the matter of a preliminary plat time extension for the plat of Hillwood Oaks No. 2 at McKnight Road and Hillwood Drive in the City of Maplewood will be coming up for consideration by the Maplewood City Council sometime this August. Since the outstanding bill from the City of Maplewood has been paid on the plats of Hillwood Oaks No. 1 and Hillwood Oaks No. 2 and since I along with Mr. Donald Campbell and Mr. Delmar Schwanz are Engineer and Of Record (respectively) on these two projects, and since I have not been paid for my work (and according to Messrs. Campbell and Schwanz they have not been paid as of this letter) nor have we therefore been properly dismissed, I would respectfully request that the time extension be granted for one year. Last year, we (Messrs. Campbell and Schwanz and I) had the plats ready for filing, given the required signatories from the client(s) Also we have been ready to file all final documents with the Maplewood Engineering Department once the developer(s) signed the proper development agreements with the City of Maplewood. Delays have been due to the developer(s) and not us. We have filed our liens on the property in question and are `h ei efoi e part ow ncr s in the properties subject to court action. Even with any other activities on the same property, the request is based on the need to resolve this matter without further complications. Please relate this request to the Maplewood City Council for their consideration. Yours truly, ITASCA ENGINEERING, Inc. y Lawrence E. Samttad, E. Minn. Reg. No. 6220 LS /hz cc: Messrs. Schwanz and Campbell 9 Attachment 5 Maplewood Planning Commission --5- Minutes of 9 -3 -91 d. Preliminary Plat - Revision of Conditions and Time Extension: Hillwood oaks Number Two The staff report was presented. The Commission discussed whether requiring installation of a water main for another plat would be setting a precedent. The history of the platting process was also discussed. Commissioner Gerke moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of a one -year time extension for the Hillwood Oaks Number Two preliminary plat. This extension is subject to the developer completing the following conditions before final plat approval: (1) Move the lot line between Lots 2 and 3, Block One, slightly to the east. This is so the rear corner of these lots meets the rear corner of Lots 5 and 6, Block One, South Oaks Second Addition. (2) Deed Outlot A to the property owner to the south. If this owner does not want Outlot A, the developer shall combine Outlot A with Lot 5, Block 2. (3) Approval by the City Engineer of final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree and street plans before any further grading or construction occurs. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. (4) Approval by the Director of Community Development of a tree plan. The Director must approve this plan before any grading begins or the City approves the final plat. (5) Approval by the City Engineer of a signed- developer's agreement and escrow for any uncompleted public improvements and tree planting required by the City. This agreement shall include, but not be limited to: (a) The installation of a street light at the intersection of Hillwood Drive and McKnight Road. The exact location and type of light shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval.. (b) The removal of the temporary cul -de -sac for Hillwood Drive and the construction of a permanent Hillwood Drive street section (curb, gutter, etc.) . This is to include the restoration of the temporary cul -de -sac area to an acceptable grade with a grass surface. (c) The installation of an eight -inch water main for the South Oaks Addition. (d) Fencing around the storm water pond. (6) The developer shall complete the final grading for all lots along Hillwood Drive with the construction of the street and Maplewood Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 9 -3 -91 utilities. The City Engineer may require retaining walls in areas with steep slopes (those exceeding 3:1) and in those areas to save large trees. Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Cardinal, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach The motion passed. e. Easem Vacat ions: Burke Avenue The staff-report was presented. Discussion followed. Commis ioner Rossbach moved the anning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution to va ate two easements on or adjacent to the )former Burke Avenue righ -of -way, between Barclay Street and Hazelwood Avenue. The Cit should approve these easement vacation' because: (1) It is. t i n the public inVerest . (2) There \is no need for hese easements because the City acquired other ease nts to replace these. commissioner ; Fischer se onded Ayes -- Axdahl, Cardinal, �t Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, ` Pearson, Rossbach The motion pasted. f. Fall Tour Staff reported tAe date for the fall tour 'is scheduled for September 24 and gill depart the City Hall parking lot at 5:30 p 6 m, 6. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There. were no vioitor P relsentations. F 7. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS a. Council Meeting: Aug st 12 & 26 Commis 'ioner Rossbach nd staff reported on these meetings. � t P g 80 STAFF PRESENTATIONS There we:� no staff presentat ons. 91 ADJOUWENT Meeti adjourned at 10:22 p.m. J -s MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks.& Recreatio Subj : Infrared Photos of City Date: October 4, 1991 0 Introduction The Open Space Committee has been actively meeting and discussing methods of surveying the City of Maplewood for potential Open Space areas. In their meeting with a representative from the Department of Natural Resources Forestry Division, an offer was made to infrared photograph the City of Maplewood. This method helps identify woods, ponds, streams and other natural resources. These photographs will also have value to the Public Works De- partment, Community Development Department, and the Parks and Recreation Department. It is requested that the City Council approve up to $1000.00 for this work and provide a transfer of funds from the Contingency Fund. Background The Open Space Committee has been meeting regularly and at their last meeting had a forester from the Department of Natural Re- sources present their method of surveying communities for trees, ponds, open space, streams and other natural resources. After reviewing the infrared photos presented by the DNR, the Open Space Committee felt that there was great value for their pur- poses of studying available Open Space in the community that would justify having these photos available for their use. The Public Works Department, Community Development Department and the Parks and Recreation Department will also have these infrared photographs available for their use in the future. Due to the late Fall season, it is important that the photographs are taken immediately so that tree cover can still be distin- gushed. The DNR considers this an ideal time for photo ra hin g p g the entire city. After the photographs are taken, developed, and laminated, there will be a report from the Department of Natural Resources with information regarding forestry, and additional in- formation will be requested from other.DNR departments, such as Soils and Water. It is felt that there is great benefit to their interpretation, as well as providing the photographic service. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council approve up to $1000.00 for the infrared photographs which will be prepared by the Department of Natural Resources and provide this funding from the Contin- gency Account. c: City Clerk AGENDA NO. c1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director ItQk'64� RE: USER FEE STUDY DATE: October 8, 1991 PROPOSAL Action by Council Endorsed - .. ..,,, Modif Fejected_... Dat e..,_...�...�........, It is proposed that David M. Griffith &Associates be hired to conduct a user fee study that will develop (a) new fee schedules for services not previously charged to users and (b) alternative schedules for existing fees to fairly allocate costs of service to user groups and produce additional revenues. It is also proposed that $15,650 of the General Fund contingency account be used to finance the study. (The additional revenues produced by the study should exceed the cost of the study.) BACKGROUND Decreases in state aids and limits on property tax increases have made it difficult for the City to maintain its present level of services. It is anticipated that this situation will not improve in the near future. Also, some City services are probably subsidized by property taxes unintentionally because (a) there has never been an in -depth study of the direct and indirect costs of providing the services that are paid for by user fees due to lack of available staff time and the special expertise that is required to allocate indirect costs and (b) fees for permits and licenses are increased annually simply by the inflation rate. A user fee study will identify the full costs of providing services for which user fees are or could be assessed and will recommend new fee schedules that will produce additional revenues.. Consequently, it will insure that non- residents pay fees with a minimum (or no) subsidy by residents. The user fee study will produce a report that will document the current revenues, costs, local subsidy and recommend fee changes on a fee -by -fee basis. A key by- product of the study, will be a city -wide cost allocation plan that will identify and allocate central service and administrative costs to all departments for the calculation of appropriate user fees. Earlier this year, David M. Griffith and Associates was requested to submit a proposal for a user fee study. DMG is a nationally recognized firm that specializes in cost recovery and revenue enhancement programs. A copy of their proposal is attached and indicates that they would charge $15,650 to do a. user fee study covering the licenses and services provided by the City Clerk's office, Public Safety, Community Development and Public Works departments. If the Council authorizes the user fee study on October 14th, DMG has indicated that it could be completed between November 30 and December 10. A proposal was also requested from Peat Marwick. Their fee for a similar user fee study was $19.,880. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that David M. Griffith & Associates be hired to conduct a user fee study as outlined in their proposal and that the costs of the study be financed by the General Fund contingency account. tmc Attachment r t a'v ,i DAVID M. GRIFFITH111 &ASSOCIATES LTD. 555 Park Street, Suite 408 St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 (612) 292.9225 July. 22, 1991 Mr. Dan Faust Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Dan: Thank you for your interest and response to the recent proposal David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. submitted to the city of Maplewood. The additional fee to include the Public Works Department would be $750.00 since a limited review of this department was included in the original proposal. For your information, I am enclosing copies of our studies for Ramsey County and Dakota County Public Works Departments. As you can see, many services and permits are subsidized by general revenues. I am also enclosing copies of two RFPs for user fee studies. I hope they are useful to you. Thank you again for your interest in David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd, and our services. Sincerely, DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD. Bonita J. Carlson Manager BJC:ss Enclosures TRAFFIC SERVICES Mission: Transportation engineering focuses its attention on increasing street capacity to obtain the highest "level of service" out of the existing street system while simultaneously in to decrease y try g ease the effect the facilities have on the social and physical environment. Ob jective: Provide engineering and technical expertise and labor for the construction repair and maintenance of traffic control systems, centerline and lane line aintin and relam in of lights an p g� p g 8 d signals. Provides traffic control, warning systems for the safe and efficient movement of edestri p ans and motor vehicles. User Fee Study Results, Comments, and Recommendations: Entrance Permits Currently, the Traffic Services division has four fees in this area. 1. Streets and entrances larger than 30 feet $50 per drive 2. Commercial entrances less than 30 feet $25 per drive 3. Residential entrances $10 per drive 4. Reconstruction of existing entrances $10 per drive Our analysis found that the size of entrance had no correlation to the labor involved in reviewing or inspection of the commercial or street entrances. Full cost of these commercial and street entrances is $148.21. It is recommended that one charge of $ 100.00 be established for commercial entrances and streets regardless of size. Residential entrance permits and the reconstruction of existing entrances permits were also found to have the same labor involved. Full cost is $43.52. It is recommended the fee be increased from $10.00 to $25.00. N 7 NEW FEES Right -of -Way Permits Right -of -way permits are issued to utility companies for modifying or installing lines through roads or intersections. Full cost per permit is $19.24. Currently, no fee is charged. Establishment of a $20.00 fee is recommended. This would generate an estimated $2,860 in new revenues annually. Traffic Signal Record Information Search Periodically, the Traffic Services division receives requests from insurance companies and attorneys for signal maintenance records, forming plans, and intersection layouts. These requests, on average, take two hours of staff time to research such information. At present, no fee is charged. It is recommended the division charge the requesting party based on the actual time spent on the information search plus overhead charges. On average, this charge will be approximately $82.00. Traffic Counts Traffic counts are requested by other government agencies. Full cost is $32.00. A $35.00 fee is recommended. Other Areas Two other items were costed out, permits for parades, races, etc., and traffic flow maps. The Public Works Administration does not feel a fee is appropriate in either of these two areas. The recommended fees would recover 64.43 percent of the related cost and result in $7,825 of additional revenues. Tables A, B, and C summarizes the cost and revenue results. I 8 • s Public Works- Traffic Ser ices Per /Unit Fee InfomitL= Sable A 0 Dapartwmt unit Current Full CUZTUnt Recomponded, RAM 4 1nias Tee Title volume Fee Cost Subsidy Fee Subsidy Entrance P - Rsdtl 80 $10.00 $43.52 $33.52 $25.00 $18.52 Entrance Pant- t30 Ft - 13 25.00 148.62 123.62 100.00 48.62 Entrance Prsct- >30 Ft 24 50.00 148.21 98.21 100.00 48.21 Peraaivt- ;tight of Way 143 r 0.00 19.24 19.24 20.00 (0.76) Peaait-P&rades, Races 3 0.00 40.20 40.20 0.00 40.20 Flow maps 500 0.00 4.54 4.54 0.00 4.34 ?raffle Simon Roe Inf 15 0.00 82.67 82.67 82.67 040 =raffle Counts 10 0.00 32.00 32.00 35000 (3.00) 0 Table E Public Wac s- Traffie Services Total Fee R rwaaw and Cost at Subsidy at Zncrsased Role at Full Subsidy at Deperawamt at You Title Fee Cost Current Fee Fee Fee Fee F ;fir nic = P=c-Rsdtl $800 $3 S2,"2 32p000 $1, 482 $1 - Past" d0 Ft 325 1 9 932 1, 607 1, 300 632 975 Entrance Part- >30 Ft 1 3,557 2 9 357 2,400 1,157 1,200 Peaait- Risht of lily 0 2 2, 751 2.860 (109) 2 Peaait- Parades, Races 0 201 201 0 201 0 Flow flaps 0 2 2p270 0 2 0 Traffic SUM Roe Inf 0 1,240 1,240 1 0 1,240 Traffic Counts 0 320 320 350 (30) 350 Dirisiara Totals $2,325 $15,753 $13,428 $10 $5 0 603 $7,825 Percient of Pull Cost 14.762 64.432 0 HIGHWAY DAKo7A Coc�.rury At the present time, no user fees are charged in the Highway Department. The study identified, however, potential fee areas which are common in Minnesota counties. In addition to the fee areas DMG and Highway personnel developed indirect cost rates for County personnel which may be used when billing on an hourly rate. Fee Areas Oversized/4verweip,ht Vehicle Permits The Highway Department issues permits for oversized or overweight vehicles. The Department recommends charging an annual fee of $140.00 per truck to businesses which have vehicles commonly exceeding size and weight limits. The cost of issuing such a permit is $4.62. However this cost does not include the.cost of the road damage caused by the overweight vehicles or the safety hazard with oversized vehicles. This fee is similar to the State of Minnesota fee for oversized and overweight vehicles. On occasion, the Highway Department will receive a request for a one -time permit for an oversized or overweight vehicle. The Department recommends a $10.00 permit fee; full cost is $4.60. Implementing recommended fees for annual and single -use oversized /overweight permits will result in estimated revenues of $17,150 annually. Mobile Home and House Moving Permits The Department recommends adopting a similar fee schedule for mobile home moving permits. Businesses may pay an annual fee of $100 .00 per truck or single use permits at $10.00' full cost is $4.59 and $4.30, respectively. Such fees will result in $10,100 of new revenues annually. Y Single use house moving permits are also issued. The recommended fee is $10.00; full cost is $9.10. Annual estimated revenue is $100. Driveway. Grading. and Utility Permits The Department also issues driveway and grading permits. County personnel review the application for the construction and often make on -site visits and follow- isits after the construction p i s completed. The full cost for driveway permits is $102.96 while grading permits cost $40.64. Recommended fees are $56.00 for both driveway and grading permits. The current olic of p Y charging a portion of the actual culvert cost to the user will be continued. These fees will result in $4,750 of revenue annually. 16 A utility permit is required for construction of cables, lines, and utilities in the County's right -of -ways. The full cost is $13.58 per permit. The Department does not recommend p a fee at this time; however, they will study further the impact and feasibility of such a fee. The Highway Department can expect to realize new revenues of $32,1 04 annually if all recommended fees are implemented. Indirect Cost Billing Rate Develument DMG provided a methodology for calculating hourly billing. rates which include direct and indirect costs. This methodology provides for an overhead factor to be applied to the staff direct per wage g p hour involved in the project. The indirect cost billing rate examines all the various budgeted components of cost by division and classifies each cost into three categories: Direct Staff time and supplies identified to specific projects or functions. Indirect - Staff time relating to general administration, budgeting, staff supervision, clerical support staff, conferences, seminars, and training. Other indirect expenses include office supplies, postage, g, communications expense, copy machines, etc., which are necessary for the Department's operation. Excluded - Costs not related to the previous two categories. This includes items such as direct materials and payment of aid to townships. In addition to budgeted division staff and supply items, appropriate departmental administration costs and Countywide overhead (i.e., Financial Services, Employee Relations, and Central Services ) were identified as indirect costs. The result of this cost is an indirect cost billing rate which can be used as needed by the Department. The indirect cost billing rate analysis is found in Appendix A. E 17 VII 2 7 Per Unit Information Table F Hiskmay Total Revenue and Cost Summary Sable G Revmus at Deparument Increased Unit Current Full Current Recau mended I meinia8 Fee Title Volume Fee Cost Subsidy Fee Subsidy FEE CK POMiIAL PER AREAS Truck Pewit -dal 170 $0.00 $4.62 $4.62 $100.00 ($95.38) Truer Pez it- Single Use 15 0.00 4.60 4.60 10.00 (5.40) !Mobile Rooe-Annual 100 0.00 4.59 4.59 100.00 (95.41) Mobile Rose- Single Use 10 0.00 4.30 4.30 10.00 (5.70) Souse Moving Pewit 10 0..00 9.10 9.10 10.00 (0.90) Driveway Permit 70 0.00 102.96 102.% 50.00 52.96 Grading Peait 25 0.00 40.64 40.64 50.00 (9.36) Utility Peaait 250 0.00 13.58 13.58 0.00 13.58 Hiskmay Total Revenue and Cost Summary Sable G 18 Revmus at Subsidy at Increased Reveane at Full Subsidy at Department Department Revenue at Fee Title Current Fee Cost Current Fee Reccamended Fee Recommended Fee Reccanended Fee FEE M POTENTIAL FEE AREAS Truck Pewit - Annual $0 $785 $785 $17,000 ($16 $17,000 Truck Permit - Single Use 0 69 69 150 (81) 150 Mobile Rome - Annual 0 459 459 10 (9 10,000 Mobile Bone- Single Use 0 43 43 100 (57) 100 Souse Moving Permit 0 91 91 100 (9) 100 Driveway Pewit 0 7,207 7,207 3,500 3 3,500 Grading Peaait 0 1,016 1 1,250 (234) 1,250 Utility Permit . 0 NON -NON 3 3,395 0 3,395 N- M- NNN--- 0 - Grand Total $0 $13,065 $13,065 $32 ($19,035) $32,100 Percent of Full Cost O.00Z 245.69Z 18 PROPOSAL TO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, FOR A USER FEE STUDY e JUNE 17, 1991 DAVID M. GRIFFITH & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 55.85 Park Street, Suite 408 St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 (612) 292 -9225 avid M. Griffith & Associates, ttd.,year of creation DAVID M. GRIFFITH y & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 555 Park Street, Suite 408 St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 (612) 292.9225 June 17, 1991 Mr. Dan Faust Director of Finance City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Faust: David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. (DMG) is pleased to submit this proposal for a targeted Cost -of- Service Study for the City of Maplewood. The overall objective of our efforts will be to allocate the. City's, indirect costs to user departments and to determine the full cost of services provided for which fees are charged in the Public Safety, Community Development, and City Clerk's offices. In order to meet these objectives, our firm would use our methodologies of indirect cost allocation and fee -for- service analysis. As such, DMG will: • prepare a Citywide cost allocation plan; • utilize a comprehensive data collection and research process geared to providing a total understanding of the functions included in the scope of the study; • conduct interviews with appropriate department managers and City administration to identify services provided. This is essential to develop a comprehensive cost analysis of all activities; • utilize computer -based analysis documenting the cost components identified by the study; 0 Mr. Dan Faust Page 2 June 17, 1991 • review our findings with department directors and top management officials to determine that project results are consistent with stated objectives. We would then summarize and present our findings to City management in the following manner: • We will provide the City with one camera -ready copy of our initial draft report, and we will conduct a meeting with the City's administration management to review the initial results and determine if any modifications are required. • We will finalize our analysis, provide the City with one camera -ready and twelve bound copies of our final report, and conduct a meeting with City management and the City Council to present the final report. • We will be available for additional meetings and discussions for an additional fee as described below. We propose to complete the study based on the following staffing arrangement: • Our firm will be responsible for conducting the data collection effort and presenting the results of the study to management. • Our firm's data processing system will be used to generate and calculate the necessary cost information. • The City will provide staff support for the duration of our assignment to assist with the actual on -site data collection. 0 Mr. Dan Faust Page 3 June 17, 1991 FEES AND EXPENSES Our professional fees are guaranteed not -to- exceed amounts and include all expenses incurred by us. For the project outlined in this proposal, our fees are a not -to- exceed pro maximum fee of $14,900. This includes all associated costs for our on -site consulting assistance as well as for the use of our computers and software to generate the various cost analyses and preparation of the study reports. p Our fee for providing assistance for additional meetings, etc., on an as- needed basis as requested by the City will be at the rate of $95.00 per consultant hour plus expenses. out-of-pocket ex p p David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. is very pleased to have the opportunity to present this proposal which we believe will enable the City to meet its objectives in a timely manner at a reasonable cost. we look forward to assisting the City of Maplewood on this very important engagement. Sincerely, DAVID M. GRIFFITH &ASSOCIATES, LTD. Wesley A. Masco Vice President WAM:ss I A PROPOSAL TO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA FOR A USER FEE STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND TECHNICAL APPROACH WORKPLAN DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS BENEFITS TO THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD FIRM QUALIFICATIONS AND CLIENT REFERENCES ENGAGEMENT SCHEDULE PROFESSIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Page 1 2 4 16 17 17 23 23 PROPOSAL TO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA FOR A USER FEE STUDY BACKGROUND As has happened in many communities throughout the country, the City of Maplewood desires to identify new funding sources for City programs during the coming years. Federal and State cutbacks and lower growth in revenues, may require either increases in the property tax or cutting back or eliminating programs, positions, and projects. It is natural then to focus attention on ways to increase revenues without impacting City programs and to do so in a way which considers both short -term benefits and long - range alternatives. Communities are finding that they are providing significant subsidies through general revenue sources to services for which fees are or could be levied. As such, communities are examining alternatives in order not to burden current and future taxpayers with these costs. They are also comin g to the conclusion that they can no longer continue to provide these large subsidies for services provided to specific users. Reducing general fund subsidies to user charges through increased fees is much more than just taking money out of one pocket and putting it into another. Pricing certain public services at full cost has a number of benefits: • User charges are paid by all users including those exempt from property taxes. A decision to finance certain services from the property tax is actually a decision to subsidize owners of exempt properties out of the pockets of those who are not exempt. • Use of services by nonresidents would be charged to the actual users, thereby reducing the burden on residents. • User charges avoid subsidization where the service is not being provided to the general public but for the specific benefit of the person charged. I 1 • User charges are a means of rationing the provision of certain services and of monitoring the demand for service level increases. • User charges and fees for certain services can be justified on the basis of equity and efficiency. They can produce information on the demand Level for services, encourage g restraint on the part of taxpayers /consumers, and help to make the connection between the amount paid and the service received. • User charges based upon full costs encourage free market alternatives and allow for comparisons of costs with private providers. The question of how much service charge financing is appropriate has been a dilemma confronting most cities. The extent of service charge financing depends on the City's legal ability to ley charges, es g the availability of other revenue sources, the community's social and political environment, and the attitudes of citizens and political leaders toward user charges. TECHNICAL APPROACH RESPONSIVE TO MAPLEWOOD'S NEEDS The primary purpose of this engagement is to document the cost of providing service for which user fees are or could be assessed. The scope of the project will include services provided by the Public Safety and Community Development departments and licenses issued by the City Clerk's office will be analyzed. Costs are not limited to direct departmental charges based on governmental accounting procedures, but rather are based on a comprehensive analysis of costs incurred by the City in providing services. Total costs include allocation of administrative departments and costs not traditionally included in departmental budgets such as depreciation, interest or carrying costs, general liability insurance, or membership dues. The emphasis on this project is to determine comprehensive costs of City services rather than the flow of resources as usually provided by traditional governmental accounting, budgeting, and reporting mechanisms. Funding mechanisms for each City service need to be identified. Existing fees recognize that it is the City's intent to recover related - costs (or a portion of them) for such services. In addition, other potential areas to establish user fees will be identified in analyzing City operations. F 2 Thus, the overall user fee analysis will assist the City of Maplewood management: • Identify opportunities for increased revenues based on reducing subsidies for services where fees are currently levied and establishing new fees in other service areas. • Develop a better understanding of the City cost structure and operating organization. Traditional budgetary and reporting systems generally focus on funding operations rather than the cost of services. In addition to establishing the costs of various City services, this study will provide the City with information on activities of selected departments. This information can serve as a basis for staffing requirements, use of private contractors, or other management priorities. More efficient g overnment can be achieved as a result of this information. The DMG technical approach will meet the objectives of the City of Maplewood by including: • A data collection and research process to provide a comprehensive understanding of selected City operations. Sound analysis during this phase will ensure comprehensive analysis in subsequent phases. • Involvement and interviews of City department managers to identify City services. This is essential to develop a comprehensive cost analysis of selected activities with a particular emphasis in identifying areas where user fees are or.could be established. • Interaction with City managers and officials to determine that project results are consistent with Maplewood's objectives and can be implemented. • Computer based analysis documenting the cost of selected City services. Since computer - based models will be used, alternative analyses can be performed to best reflect actual circumstances. This would maximize the use of the project's results. Each governmental entity is unique, based on the scope of services it provides and the methods used to deliver such services. Thus, there is no routine method of performing a user fee study. As a result, thorough, comprehensive analysis goes into each project undertaken by DMG. 3 In addition to trained professionals thoroughly analyzing City operations and costs, DMG has also developed copyrighted cost allocation software for . state and local governments. Our software products further contribute to successful engagements that are not rivaled by any other national accounting or consulting firm. The two primary models which would be used on the City of Maplewood engagement are the Griffith Cost System and the Fee and Service Technical Review Study ( FASTR). The Griffith Cost System uses a sophisticated double reiteration cost process so that all costs are accurately allocated to line departments and program areas. Besides providing accurate costing information, the Griffith Cost System also displays . a high level of information for each costing objective. Further, the system has a high degree of flexibility to handle the various functions provided by City departments. FASTR is a recent DMG innovation to accurately analyze and summarize information to cost services and establish fees for local government services. It has a high degree of flexibility in analyzing City costs so that accurate, thorough costing can be employed. The tedious effort usually associated with multiple processing of such analyses (which is typical in preparing detailed reports for the first time a cost analysis is prepared) is reduced which.increases engagement efficiency by reducing professional time on- manual calculations. Further, it reduces the clerical effort associated with such engagements. Costs used to generate these analyses could be based on actual or budgeted costs. The most current information (City budget) would result in the most accurate recovery for the upcoming year. Based on our experience, recoveries can be as much as 10% greater using budgeted costs. On the other hand, use of actual costs is often more defensible based on a general preference to historical results. The costs used would be mutually determined with the City of Maplewood management. WORKPLAN The following work plan details the major tasks involved in the technical approach to achieve the project's objectives. a 4 Task 1. Initiate User Fee Pro„ ect This task consists of those activities required to initiate the engagement in a manner that will ensure timely and successful project completion. Included are the following steps: • Meet with the City of Maplewood management and Department heads to discuss the goals, objectives, and overall scope of the engagement. • Obtain pertinent data relating to the project including: - organization charts - budgets - prior fee /revenue analyses (if any) - cost allocation documents or schemes (if any) - employee classification and compensation schedule Task 2. Develop Revenue History An analysis of selected user fee revenues will be completed. DMG will also identify service activities where revenues might be generated that are not currently being utilized based on a preliminary review of City operations and experience with other Cities. Task 3. Diagram City Organizational Structure to Develop Methods to Allocate Costs The ultimate objective of the user fee study is to determine the full cost of each service provided by the City. Cost of services includes more than the direct labor (salary) cost of City personnel providing the service. Other major costs components include the following: • Central Service Support operations such as Finance, Personnel, and Administration which are provided centrally to all City departments. Centrally B dgeted Items Costs that are generally administered centrally for budgetary or efficiency purposes that benefit all departments. Such costs can include fringe benefits, pension, and insurance coverage. Z 5 • Departmental and Division Administration In addition to allocated. costs for central services and centrally budgeted costs, costs associated with administerin g department artment operations including .department and division overhead needs to be allocated to activities within each department. This also includes other general department costs such as rent utilities, supplies, and other costs. The cost relationships between central services, centrally budgeted items, and administration, as well as costs from other departments, are quite complex. Accordingly,. a detailed analysis of costs needs to be performed. The first step in cost allocation is to diagram the organizational structure of the City. Each department would then be categorized as a central services department, direct service department, P , or a .combination of each type. This task is the basis of subsequent cost analyses. Attachments 1 and 2 illustrate the cost relationships of a typical organization. Task 4. PreDare Citywide Cost Allocation Plan As previously noted, certain costs are incurred centrally and are not associated with a specific department or service. The two primary categories of such cost are Central Services and Centrally Budgeted Expenditures. Such costs should be allocated to departments providing services including those for which user fees are or could be assessed in a fair and equitable manner. DMG has developed its unique cost allocation system to accumulate all central service and centrally budgeted costs and allocate them to departments providing City services. The end P roduct is a Citywide Cost Allocation Plan. Costs are allocated to either departments or divisions within Departments based on the unit being analyzed in the subsequent analysis of services provided by the City. Costs not only include those in the budgetary accounting system and financial statements based on the governmental accounting basis (i.e., flow of funds), but also includes other costs such as depreciation, provisions for pensions consistent with GAAP rather than statutory requirements, and interest on borrowed funds. Cost principles for a Citywide Cost Allocation Plan are comparable to those of a business enterprise where profit as well as cost recovery are the primary motivation. 31 Attac ent 1 • 6MC; 'COST All ODOLO 11913 ,. , •ate' �.'�'!^" \. \` '. ,;,;,.� �: � .� ' \.,v`'Ow.�.� `:`` :��:• <�;��. .•.. \'•�:� ...C+:. .•::::::. GOVERNMENT WIDE COST ALLOCATION PLAN • Care Sarvica Agencies - Cantrally Budgeted Items • -Parsonnei • Fringe Hensib • unary • fnsuranca • Data Pro=sing • Redrernent • Pur=asing DEPARTMENT Admoistrauve Cc= • 06camment Heart • C:acialt Support D IVISI O N Ad m nistrsTtive Casts • 0wisicn Head • C4'arI ! Su ort NNW OPERATING 01VISION , yam_ y�y � �� y� `.��'�• PE_ • 6MC; Attacsmat 2 USER FEE COST FLOW CHART (Single Department) c- NTRALLv. B UDGLTz'D =z.MS CI. 1 L SEORVICES • Frinze Be =etlts ■ Admin. & Finance s••ss•g? • Pensions ■ Personnel • Ins ura n ce • PosrthasfM i = 1 1 D Es? ARTME_N7AL AL} MLNIS iRATIO N • a■ a a : �■ �■ ■� ■s a a De p 3r1= es t He = ■■ •■.r ■■� i ■ Clerscil Su000rt MMMMV DIVISION AD1i.I:ISiZATIOt�I ■•� ••.... 1 ■ Clenczl Su000rt 1 � ' t s a s Operating 70peruing Oper i dig DiYisioa ision DfYision A B r Fee A Fee 8 Fa- Fee E.Akrm A Fe= C Fee A Fez D o a t ez Service SerTice rTice ce Se"icr SerYicr SerYic= Service Ares Area ea Area Are s Ares Ares I t � Z Le■�s■ I l � ToW l 1 Fee A ■ ■ L■... .. ■.. ■.■ ■.. :■. ■.■.,■ ■■.... ■.� ■■ Scrrice : ■ ■ ...i f s j Cost Per c,. ; The Citywide Cost Allocation Plan is a detailed defensible distribution of central service overhead to benefiting departments and programs. Before finalizing the plan and endorsing its results, the plan will be reviewed with the City Management and any changes made as appropriate. Besides serving as the basis of costs to determine user fees, the Citywide Cost Allocation Plan also identifies central service (general fund) support for the enterprise funds. Based on our experience, many Cities have generally subsidized these funds by not obtaining reimbursements for the full cost of services being provided to these . funds. Finally, the comprehensive presentation of the nature and consumption of central services would provide City management with additional information to use during budget preparation and administration. Task 5. Analvze Emt)lovee Effort or Services at the Departmental /Divisional Level Most government services are labor based; benefits are proportional to the relative effort of the staff. Accordingly, the primary method to allocate costs in the service departments would be based on labor cost. The initial task to allocate labor in the departments is to identify services and activities of employers within departments /divisions. This would be accomplished through interviews with department heads and appropriate administrators. This would be the second opportunity to identify potential services for which fees could be assessed. For all services identified, the individual primarily responsible for administering the function would summarize the time associated with the service activity. This would encompass total direct hours in providing the service including administration, review, and quality control in addition to the hours involved in directly providing the service. The estimated demand for services would next be determined. This would be based on an average of prior year's results and /or an estimate of current year's activity. An alternative would be to estimate service level based on staffing levels so that "idle capacity" inefficiencies are not included in the cost of the service. I W The FASTR system will extend labor cost for each job category and service. It will calculate total costs by the area, unit costs by fee area, and department hours that are not allocated. Department management can then analyze the unallocated hours to determine if any hours should be prorated to service activities or if certain activities have not been identified (a third opportunity to identify new fee generating activities). Such allocations are not arbitrary but rather reflect the fact that all hours and costs in a service department generally need to be allocated to a service provided. The following are examples of some justifications to prorate time: • General administration benefiting all service activities. • Planned nonproductive time for travel between locations, equipment downtime, training, and other similar situations. Employee absences if not separately accumulated. • Minimum staffing requirements for given service demand. Attachment 3 is an example of the results of the analysis completed during this task. Before the analysis is finalized, costs on the schedule are reconciled to the budget or financial statements, whichever is the basis of the cost analysis. Further, allocations and results are reviewed with departments to determine whether allocations fairly reflect organizational structure. Again, this is critical since the accuracy of this study requires that department operations are analyzed in a comprehensive manner. 0 to] 11 0000vo 0000%rs 000%r .r tit tf� N fn �1 .p • .p .4 a . . p. O. C O O O UM vok O� •v .t .r . ti •! ti ti o - C C . 4b .4 O .r v Vol W 2 :u ... O Cc .� < co }` u+ o ,c o .t .t _ •o Cl P•. -.r o N < M dui O O Pry - a _ W ._ 9- r, .r H W .+ o W < V v � L W� W 000000 N otioo�— �o�+vo•v, � � •�• tt1 LA N 0% . . �t pn 1A N . N !�'1 V1 �O N Nd N N tv ev N N ^, A N • v v C LU L. W C Q d WAIP H7 �• W O►O (ZOO" O�+000v+ .x00,0 N D O rO p' "� O O N CO *4 O O► ... W wl% iA © Q ey O co 1�1 O N - • s � a. — ♦- v .o W T� tiJ W < "m � � O a c 0 000000 o °0 -0 °0 0 C0CQ°0 o •- o 0 0 0.6 Ob CI �.? N N tiA v1 � iR N N Ai N tl! r � w r.► . Lm aw v Cv• w o .� C E ♦ r3 4 N o s� w O m o Y ii V O a"a-a o' us v .. w w V "� N 0 0 C m u o c. — O Q = v . u o '� o v t. L. to V e o ._ W. .� .� ca w o v -- v o �u�ooc� w 4.. .. N v o a w c. L s. • c. d �. �. ` .. u amp "NO o •— o c. 9. v .. moo a ds . — =c =aan o -- o L. _. = osa.a.o ..- C— 3 0 0 ago <• -•- x o °OQO°f*4- A040CD ov000.ON * '^ ° o c o Q © co0 eV tiO.rw% �* • • C D o ••- 40 %An Ow NM OC2NW%N rc Wl% 40M w U31 ` 0 d C W 404 ~ •�•� L. to = Y N ` ♦_ m -. O► _ "m O ♦ �► _ �0 Q w. _ •+ to a w H H Z V w .o M q .�. > Ci • O V r M< M aw .r 11 Task 6. Calculate Total Service Area Cost. As previously discussed. total cost b serv Y � y area consists of the labor cost, other departmental costs other than personnel services (p rofessional services contractual services, commodities, -etc.), agency /departmental administration, central service costs and centrally budgeted costs. Costs incurred by all City departments in rovidin a service are p g included in the full cost. These costs are combined for analysis in the FASTR System. Y Y Labor costs are combined with other cost components from department budgets (division administration and expenditures other than personnel services) and the Citywide Cost Allocation Plan (central service, centrally budgeted, and departmental costs). The allocation method for these other cost components is based on proportional labor cost for each service activity. other allocation bases can be specified for each individual line item as circumstances warrant. For example, certain professional services in a department might relate to a specific fee area. Such costs would be entirel allocated to that fee area. Task 7. Summarize Revenues g and Costs by Service Area The costs developed during Tasks 5 and 6 are combined with the revenue history data from Task 2. A separate schedule detailing the information for each area, regardless of whether there is a current charge, is prepared. These schedules include the following information: • Description of the fee - Title - Responsible department - Fee schedule • Service costs - Standard cost (based on direct, specific time and labor costs) - Full cost (standard cost plus adjustments for indirect, unspecific pro rated costs) • Projected revenue under existing and proposed rates Each summary is reviewed with department personnel to decide on what action should be taken. Attachment 4 is an example of the cost components compared to the revenue of a plan check fee. 12 Attachment 4 DMG APPROACH TO FEE ANALYSIS PLAN REVIEW i. FULL COST OF PlZOVMLNG SERVICE: • Direct Labor Total Per U S enior Bul"Idina Code Te c an S 1,982 S 4.01 S.,emcr Buix. 29 ,.2 9.7 2 nd Build Pee 7 6,!5 6 2 150 8 Ceae:.i :� d.*inisu 26,25 7 134,31.1 S2 .'VM'. •.�.• . \. \VIII.' . . -...: ',. ..�'.'.:�:: .,•• .A� .. .... .. .. . .. 1 1► •MIN.' '.� : '.�• .\•. : A'. �•I.• •.•M �•. \': :::'I.:: : 1. ... ...... A• .'�..�\ • .. N. . • ... .. • .0 IIIdPdlP4P,#0,,rI II4�iII i�� . a... ao.. i. a40 oo. 0a.• .•.��..��.��•.�.��.��.�...�� • Other Direct Costs S 19 0. S 8. • Department overhead • Count; Overhead 28,869 • Incoming Cost 8 7.00 TOT.A. FULL COST 2 UivTTS OF SLRVICE: �. C 4. GENERAL FvND SUBSIDY: 5. P A D D ONAL REVENUE: 193,165 S 3 91.0? I 4 ,9�j S 30.23 S 1`7 8,230 S 360.7 9 _S178,230 S 360.79 1 3 Task 8. Review Pro iect Results with City Management At this state of the project, the local subsidy for each service will have been calculated. The ultimate ro'ect ob jective is to increase the City' p � ) ys revenues by setting fees closer to their actual costs. There are several issues which must be considered. These include: • Political feasibility • Existing legislation • Effects on a social group • Impact on service demand During this task, we will review the initial results and discuss each fee area with City management to finalize recommendations regarding new fee levels. The schedules developed in the previous step will be revised to reflect any changes during this review. The final decision of user fees will obviously be the City's; however, DMG consultants will provide insights and recommendations. Special attention should be given to researching the legal authority to implement and /or increase user fees. At a minimum, changes to user fees may require changes to local laws and ordinances. This would be the ideal time to involve the City's legal counsel or his /her designees to determine the legality of any changes proposed and what steps would,be necessary to implement proposed changes. Any legal obstacles identified by legal counsel to implement increases, particularly in State laws, would be included in our final report to enable the City to initiate corrective action. The results for all fee areas will be consolidated into summary schedules. These summaries will be presented by department and individual fee areas including the following: • Fee area • Current volume • Fees - Current - Full cost 14 • Revenues Current Full cost revenues Recommended • Subsidy Current Recommended Task 9. Prepare and Provide Draft Report Our standard procedure is to provide our project report to our clients in draft form prior to final distribution. This procedure provides an opportunity to discuss individual recommendations in detail prior to report finalization. Based on these discussions the draft report will be modified as required and submitted in final form. Task 10. Present Final Report The subject of fees for service raises many important considerations within the governmental arena at the political level and with the public. It is extremely important that all parties fully understand the basis for and rationale behind the project findings and recommendations. To this end, DMG is committed to working to insure the requisite level of understanding. This typically requires: • An indepth presentation to staff /departmental managers in the methodology underlying the cost and revenue analysis. • A presentation to management with less emphasis on detailed methodology but greater emphasis on the impact of recommendations and implementation strategies. • An engagement presentation to the City to provide an overview of the project and its findings. Any questions concerning the project would.be answered at this time. The above presentations are typical and can be highly beneficial. However, on occasion, some clients do not desire this depth of exposure. we, of course, completely honor the desires of the City in such matters. IE 15 Y. 4 . i 11 Task 11. Project Close Out In the final task, we erform those activities necessary t p y o insure successful project completion. Included are: • Remaining questions are answered. • Methodology for and proposed update requirements are discussed. We stand ready to assist the City in implementing and defending the costs of user fee services that are identified in our study. The above tasks summarize the necessary requirements of a comprehensive user service revenue/ cost analysis. We are committed to work with the City to carry out those activities specifically desired. DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS The final reports to the City will include: • Citywide Cost Allocation Plan This plan will identify and allocate central service and centrally budgeted costs incurred on behalf of every operating department. In addition to identifying the costs associated with departments administering fee generating services, the associated corporate fund costs will be determined. An Executive Cost /Revenue Summary_ This document will summarize the current revenues, costs, local subsidy, and recommend fee changes on a fee -by -fee basis. It will also identify the services for which no fee is currently in place, although a fee could be implemented. • Background on Individual Fees Each service area for which a fee is in place or would be enacted will be presented. This analysis- will include: Revenue history and fee structure Analysis of costs Department recommendations Revenue projections at recommended fees I r We will provide the City with twelve copies of the executive summary of. the report. Additional copies will be provided at actual cost. BENEFITS TO. THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Once implemented, the results of this study will represent an immediate and long -term increase in local revenues. Within six months, most governments have implemented fee increases that recover p at least 20 % of the identified subsidy. Aside from an immediate infusion of new revenue a higher revenue base for the future years is established. A portion of any revenue increase is also attributable to fees for services where previously no fee had been charged. A second benefit to the City is the development of an additional and more comprehensive cost accounting framework for determining the full cost of City operations. Because this engagement requires the determination of the complete cost of each administrative service and the appropriate share to be borne by each operating department, the actual costs (and benefits ) are clearly identified. For example, part of the methodology may involve determining the full costs of data roce i p ss ng services and the share of these costs each operating department should bear. These costs can then be objectively compared to costs of similar services from outside vendors and to benefits received. Finally, we recommend that the City consider retaining DMG, under separate contract, to update the data two to three years after the study to reflect the new unit cost levels based on general price level increases. This will allow the City to use this information as a budgetary tool where unit cost analysis, g Y a ysis, together with projections of service levels and anticipated revenues, offer a more rational approach to budget deliberations than the traditional incremental and across- the -board funding approaches. FIRM OUALIFICATIONS AND CLIENT REFERELACES Principal -in- Charge /Contract Officer Wesley Masco is Vice President responsible for the North Central Region of David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. and will serve as Principal- -Charge C arge and the overall contract officer for the engagement. Mr. Masco holds a bachelor's degree from Purdue University, majoring in Management. He has been a consultant to governmental agencies for over fifteen years. Mr. Masco has managed numerous governmental and private sector consulting engagements involving management and organizational performance. He will coordinate members 17 of the -DMG project team and oversee production and submission of contract deliverables. He will also ensure timely involvement in all necessary meetings and follow -up testimony. There will be no charge to the project for Mr. Masco's time. Pro iect Manager Bonnie Carlson, a Manager, in DMG's St. Paul office, will be the overall Project Manager for the study. Ms. Carlson will supervise all members of the project team, take an active part in the project tasks, and will be responsible for all day -to -day activities and coordination. She will conduct the City's Central Service Cost Allocation plans and Cost of Services analyses. Ms. Carlson's resume describing relevant prior experience and client references are included on the following pages. E 18 BONITA J. CARLSON MANAGER NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA Ms. Carlson is a Consultant and Project Manager for David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd. responsible for cost allocation and cost -of- service studies. Prior to her association with David M. Griffith & Associates,. Ltd., Ms. Carlson served as Administrative Services Director and Finance Director for two Minnesota cities, the City of Chaska and the City of Morris, where her most significant responsibilities included: Financial Management Cash and Investment Management Utility Billing Administration and Rate Analyses (Water, Sewer, and Electric) Budget Preparation and Administration Financial Report Preparation in accordance with GA A P Special Assessment Administration Debt Management • Risk Management Insurance Administration • Data Processing - Needs Assessments Hardware and Software Evaluation Systems Administration Ms. Carlson was the Project Manager for our cost -of- service studies in the Minnesota Counties of Olmsted, Hubbard, Ramsey, Dakota, Benton, Rice, Nicollet, and LeSueur, the City of Des Moines Iowa, and targeted studies for the City of St. Paul and Wright County. In the summer of 1990, she performed a Cost /Benefit Analysis of the Richland County, North Dakota, Proposed Home Rule Charter. She is currently the Project Manager for the cost -of- service studies in Becker and Washington Counties. N E BONITA J. CARLSON (continued) Ms. Carlson received a B.A. Degree in English from the University of Minnesota. She has over sixteen years' public sector experience in financial administration prior to joining our firm. She has served as a Director on the League of Minnesota Cities and League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Board. She has also been an active member of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association, holding the offices of President, President- Elect, Treasurer, and Executive Board member. Prior Relevant Experience Ms. Carlson brings a comprehensive knowledge of City government to this project. As Finance Director /Assistant City Manager for the City of Morris and Administrative Services Director in the City of Chaska, she has an indepth understanding of all City operations. In addition, her activities when serving on the League of Minnesota (LMC) Board of Directors, LMC Building Committee, and as an officer for the Minnesota Government Finance Officers' Association has given her a broader based understanding of the issues and policies in Minnesota cities. Ms. Carlson served as Project Manager for the following study: • City of Des Moines Cost -of- Service Study. This study, performed in 1989, analyzed cost -of- service activities in the General Fund. Based upon the cost determinations and recommendations included in the report, the City of Des Moines will increase revenues from service fees in excess of $700,000 per year. Ms. Carlson also managed similar cost -of- service projects for five Minnesota counties with the following results: County Benton County Dakota County Hubbard County Ramsey County Olmsted County Annual Increased Revenue $ 63,718 $588,118 $ 56,457 $858,951 $250,000 20 BONITA J. CARLSON (continued) Other Relevant Experience: • City of St. Paul /Ramsey County Joint Purchasing Study. City of St. Paul Use -of- Street Permit Study. • Cost Benefit Analysis, Richland County Home Rule Charter. • Wright County, Minnesota, Law Enforcement Cost Analvsis. I 21 DAVID M. GRIFFITH &ASSOCIATES, LTD. REFERENCES • Mr. Marshall Grabau Operations and Program Analysis City of Des Moines East First and Locust Des Moines, Iowa 50307 515- 283 -4221 • Mr. James Snyder Department of Finance and Management Services City of St. Paul 234 City Hall St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 612 -298 -4118 • Mr. Richard Person Project Manager InfraStructure Inventory Program City of St. Paul Department of Public Works St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 612 -292 -6122 • Mr.. Karl Nollenberger County Administrator St. Louis County Courthouse 100 North Fifth Avenue, West, Room 202 Duluth, Minnesota 55802 -1287 218 -726 -2456 • Mr. William Scott, III Benton County Auditor 531 Dewey Street Foley, Minnesota 56329 612 -968 -6254 • Ms. Lois Spear Controller Metropolitan Waste Control Commission 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612- 229 -2017 • Mr. Robert M. Bendzick Chief Financial Officer Olmsted County Courthouse 515 Second Street, SW Rochester, Minnesota 55902 507 -285 -8471 • Mr. Richard P. Johnson Director of Financial Services Dakota County 1600 West Highway 55 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 612 - 438 -4590 • Mr. Roland Vik Hubbard County Auditor /Administrator Courthouse, Third and Court Streets Park Rapids, Minnesota 56470 218- 732 -3196 • Mr. Terry Schutten Ramsey County Executive Director 286 Courthouse 15 .West Kellogg Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 612 -298 -5980 • Mr. James Mulder Executive Director Association of Minnesota Counties 125 Charles Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 612 -224 -3344 • Ms. Kay Bratten Richland County Commissioner Second Vice President National Association of Counties Richland County Courthouse Wahpeton, North Dakota 58075 701- 642 -7700 N 22 ENGAGEMENT SCHEDULE User fee analyses typically require three to four months to complete. We estimate that our preliminary results will be available within two months. Once the initial results are available the remaining time is used to develop specific recommendations (reflecting he City's comments g Y ), confirming our findings with City personnel, and presenting the results to City Management., elected officials, and interested third parties. PROFESSIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Our fee for this engagement will be fixed. l } A fixed, not to exceed amount of $14,900 which includes all expenses incurred by us. Payment of this fee will be due upon progress billings to the City. We will bill at the rate of $7,500 at the end of the first two months with a $7 payment upon completion and delivery of the study. X 23 v MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: OWNER: APPLICANT: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: _ INTRODUCTION Rec,ruests City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Sign Plan Review 2720 and 2730 Stillwater Road Gramer Partners Knowlan's Supermarket's, Inc. Midvale Center October 4, 1991 (Vern Thraen) Vern Thraen is requesting approval of a sign plan for the Midvale Center and a special permit for an above.roof sign. The sign plan includes signs for the Oakdale Pharmacy at the corner of Century Avenue and Stillwater Road and the Knowlan's building. The plan identifies both buildings as part of the Midvale Center. The proposed signs are: 10 A "Midvale Center" sign painted on both sides of the concrete block parapet which stands above the roof line. 2. " Knowlan's Supermarket and Deli" on the rear elevation of the building. 30 18- inch -tall tenant names on the east elevation in plastic letters. 49 A new dark green awning on the front of the Knowlan's building. This awning would be backlit with fluorescent lights. Store names would be in white on the awning. 5. A new dark green awning on all sides of Oakdale Pharmacy. The awning would have "Oakdale Pharmacy" on the front and sides. 6. A 25 -foot -tall pylon sign at the corner of Century Avenue and Stillwater Road identifying "Midvale Center." Sal Fattah, the owner of Oakdale Pharmacy, plans to install his new awning within one year after the signs are up on the Knowlan's building. (See page 10.) Knowlan's would remove the brown mansard canopy on the front of their building. Reasons for the Requests 1 . City Code requires that shopping centers and other comprehensive developments shall submit a comprehensive sign plan. City Code requires a special permit from the City Council for an above -roof sign. BACKGROUND - Knowlan's Sign History March 1, 1979: The City Council approved the sign plan for the Knowlan's building. Council required the removal of the nonconforming signs. The Council also required that the concrete block roof sign be painted off within four years of this approval as required by Code. August 12, 1991: The City Council denied a wall- mounted readerboard sign for Knowlan's. Council also directed Staff to notify the tenants with nonconforming signs to remove them. September 10, 1991: Staff wrote to Century Laundromat, Appliance Specialists and Northland Golf requiring the removal of their nonconforming signs. DISCUSSION Thee proposed plan will benefit this corner by unifying the signage between the two buildings and cleaning up the sign clutter on the Knowlan's building. The sign on the concrete parapet could be used instead of another pylon sign and would be less obtrusive. RECOMMENDATION i. Approve a special permit for the Midvale Center sign on the above -roof parapet. 2. Approval of the sign plan dated October 1 1991 for Midvale Center, 2790 and 2730 Stillwater Road. The new signs for 2720, the Knowlan's building, shall be installed right away. The signs and canopy for 2730, Oakdale Pharmacy, shall be installed one year later. to \midvale.mem (section 25 -29) Attachments 16 Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Pylon Sign 5e.. East Elevation, South Elevation and Parapet Sign 6. Store -front Canopy Signs 7. Oakdale Pharmacy Canopy Signs 8. Letter from Sal Fattah dated October 1, 1991 9. Existing Signs on Knowlan's Building 2 Beaver c Q J GasE av o P� IL 32 32 El %• LJ !:mow ;�.�� 1 LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 Q N 4 It : •1 So L) o 1 1 .r, ` ! P IL 114 ll do / s J L t to 4� 40 o o f � ' � \ X11 •, � .�. F8 ' J....... ".'...', M. Lik Nvool j 1 077 - x ,mot - \ . s : 6 .� S - �o •s �� 1059 W cc Q 1657l, 1 04 o .a . 1 1 W 103 �-�• 1 Fo 1029 2 • •�� ` '\ Z 2 L7 I .,. AN Vo A _ s if W J Q Y Q O PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP GI Attachment 2 4 N s. te ••�.• *. •' •'� t 10 •.. • t:` • a t t • .00- Vol$ 10 or go Ab • _ �+ ' ; � � �• ` ., . /• >> • - ;• L i Ile or - - we i _ op y . _ ii •• - may••. : • • SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 3 4 N @4@.i • 7 3 f'a Mr��r�r� ir�lOii.�leW��v�tst• MAI M m ap 1 N 0 C.3 .....� !A i• .. !: /:A �.1 M•ru...:.► �A. a IJ: • . � .M �' � .5- =4 kob. saw. ..ft.. . fmlpdmLwm w..c� p :! N 1, � � 0 Q N � C� a � w ' L KA o C h, LAX t o e= LK 0 � S c� 0 0, A t a o.. q y Ow 0 Attachment' 5' •' • wv.u•.� tR7':'tPlt _ _ .1�'!'�OQ't.lt�'��T:� . BMW- �: � frwl i�.ira:Ni�:.i:�:��r`. !hari�iiZfiJfi.y��.ir::.l,�.�. •r'i.: f i 1 7 A 1 Q t� Z lit C.1 cz w z -- a E3 � t . � f �a ' N Attachment 0 0 in Co T OD N LIM u 8 � 8 At �a s w (19 11 z �o w zrn as Q cv ° v� N CY ell Attachment 7 S I ! r. t r � i1t 1 j Ir 1I of C OEM .i i , ifd jet iil � r i;. ii , 00 0, r �C fir! F ; t � r ; �1: r 4 rYr is i + • Ir t woe- ..� l j i ti .jr �r! fif 't ilt yl ` tr r! (.i i, '!t t f t jr ;t 'i tip a il i` f ! I r t t j ! f { 'i i � r4 fr+ li{ i �!r rir OCT 0 1991 1 1' t ;It 10 Attachment 8 r;: SOUTH ELEVATION 1 9 1 a PROPOSED SIGN EAST ELEVATION NORTHLAND GOLF WALL SIGNS $,�2� kNo wc��s s N o P L- u ►2 on �tT t I � APPLIANCE SPECIALISTS NORTH ELEVATION WALL SIGN t PROPOSED SIGN 11 Attachment 9 _ KNOWLAN'S BAKERY AND DELI SIGN ' SOUTH ELEVATION 1 9 1 a PROPOSED SIGN EAST ELEVATION NORTHLAND GOLF WALL SIGNS $,�2� kNo wc��s s N o P L- u ►2 on �tT t I � APPLIANCE SPECIALISTS NORTH ELEVATION WALL SIGN t PROPOSED SIGN 11 Attachment 9 Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes 10 -8 -91 the building. Submit plans for screening to the City for staff approval (2) Submit cash escrow o an rrevocable letter of. credit to the City for any required w rk not completed.by occupancy,, The amount of escrow requ ed shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. Th Aty Attorney must approve an agreement from the ppl cant granting the City permission to enter onto the la d to c plete any unfinished work. (3) Apply for sign ermits. T is approval does not include signs. Boardmember Tho, son seconded yes- Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson b4, comprehensive Sign Plan - Midvale Center (Knowlan's Building and Oakdale Pharmacy), 2720 and 2730 Stillwater Road Vern Thraen was present representing the Midvale Center. Mr. Thraen stated that he has changed the awning color from orange to dark green. Boardmember Thompson complimented Mr. Thraen for all the work he has done preparing the present sign plan. Boardmember Robinson moved approval of: (1) A special permit for the Midvale Center sign on the above- roof parapet. (2) Approval of the sign plan dated October 1, 1991, for Midvale Center, 2720 and 2730 Stillwater Road. The new signs for 2720, the Knowlan's building, shall be installed right away. The signs and canopy for 2730, Oakdale Pharmacy, shall be installed within one year. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Holder, 6. DESIG REVIEW 7. VISITO PRESENTATIONS There we e no isitor presentations. 8. BOARD PRE NT TIONS There were Board presentations. 9. STAFF PRESE TION6 a. Board emb r volunteer for the October 14 Council meeting: Mary Erick on b. Secretary Ekstrand informed the Board of future agenda items.