The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991 08-12 City Council PacketAGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 12, 1991 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 91 -15 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.3uly 15, 1991 Council /Manager Meeting 2.Meeting No. 91 -14 (July 22, 1991) 3.August 1, 1991 Council /Manager Meeting E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1.Approval of Claims 2.Transfers to Close Improvement Projects 3.Upper Afton Road, Project 86 -07: Acceptance of Project 4.Nature Center Donation 5.Conditional Use Permit Review: 2696 Hazelwood Avenue 6.Conditional Use Permit Review: Sloan Place (St. Paul Business Center East 7.Conditional Use Permit Review: 225 -255 Roselawn Av. (St. Paul Business Center West) 8.Conditional Use Permit Review: 2120 -2124 Woodlynn Ave. (The Village on Woodlynn) 9.Final Payment: Beam Avenue Signal, Project 89 -15 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1.7:00 p.m., 2675 Larpenteur Avenue (Priory) 2.7:10 p.m., 2180 White Bear Avenue (Finalube) Condiitonal Use Permit Revision Conditional Use Permit Renewal 3.7:30 p.m., Code Change: Single and Double Dwellings (1st Reading H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.Beebe Road, North of Larpenteur Ave.: Autumnwood Villas Conditional Use Permit for a P. U. D. Preliminary Plat 2.Open Space Committee Appointments 3. Presentation of Proposed Community Center Feasibility Study J. NEW BUSINESS 1.DeSoto /Burr Driveway 2.Conditional Use Permit Review and Use Car License: 2720 Maplewood Drive (Yankovec) 3.Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87 -32 4.Sign Review: 2720 Stillwater Road (Knowlan's) 5.Sterling Street and Schaller Drive, Project 87 -45: Schedule Public Hearing 6.Contract for Auditing Services 7.Duluth- English Storm Sewer, Project 90 -13: Schedule Public Hearing 8.Prepayment of 1983 G.O. Improvement Bonds 9.Harvester Storm Sewer and Street Improvements, Project 90 -12: Schedule Public Hearing 1O.City Land Purchase: 2050 -2146 White Bear Ave. 11.Highwood McKnight Outlet, Project 90 -10: Approve Plans 12.Viking Drive West of Arcade 13.Nomination for Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1.Fuel System Update 2. 3. 4. N. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL /MANAGER MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 4:30 p.m., Monday, July 15, 1991 Conference Room A, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in Conference Room A, at Maplewood City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Councilperson Zappa at 4:32 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Councilperson Dale Carlson Councilperson Fran Juker Councilperson George Rossbach Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present - arrived at 4:40 p.m. Present Absent Present Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Human Resource Director Gail Blackstone C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following additions were made to the agenda: D. NEW BUSINESS 8. Goodwill Sign 9. Open Space Commission Update 10. Parade Update 11. Study Commission F. FUTURE TOPICS 8. LMC Conference Councilmember Rossbach moved that the agenda be approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and approved. Ayes: Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa Absent: Bastian 07/15/91 1 D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Negotiations Update Councilmember Rossbach negotiations with A.F.S.C.M.E. The motion was Councilmember Carlson and approved. Ayes: Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa Absent: Bastian Councilmember Zappa recessed the meeting at 4:34 p.m. Mayor Bastian arrived at the meeting at 4:40 p.m. Mayor Bastian reconvened the meeting at 5:35 p.m. 2. Mid -Year Retreat Follow -Up City Manager McGuire summarized the five City goals which were established at the Council /Staff retreat in April, 1991 and reviewed what action by the staff had been taken to date on the five goals. 3. Firemen's Relief Association Update City Manager McGuire reported on the first meeting between representatives of the cities of Oakdale, Landfall and Maplewood and members of the Firemen's Relief. Association regarding City contributions for 1992. Following some discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council to contact the Mayor or the City Manager before August 14, 1991 with any comments or recommendations on the position of the City during these negotiations. 4. City Summer Picnic /Boat Trip Authorization City Manager McGuire and Human Resource Director Blackstone proposed an old fashioned family picnic for the City's employee summer event for which the City would fund the entire cost of the event. Councilperson Zappa moved staff should plan an old- The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson Ayes: All 5. Disposition of 1800 E. County Road B House Assistant City Manager Maglich reported the possible options for the use, removal, or demolition of the house located at 1800 East County Road B. Following some discussion, Councilperson Zappa 07/15/91 2 motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson Ayes: Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa Nays: Bastian 6. Cash Procedures City Manager McGuire reported that the investigation of the missing funds from the Deputy Registrar's area is being conducted by the Police Department. Following the investigation, there will be an analysis of the cash procedures used by all departments, and a final report will be written with the assistance of the City's auditors. 7. Special Legislation City Manager McGuire reported that the special legislation to remove the Chief of Police position from the Police Civil Service system did not pass last year. It was the consensus of the City Council to send letters to the members of the City's Legislative Delegation asking the representatives why the proposed bill did not become law, and then resubmit the bill for the 1992 Legislative Session. 8. Goodwill Sign Councilmember Zappa asked about the new sign located_in the parking lot of the Goodwill store on White Bear Avenue. City Manager McGuire stated that the sign was in conformance with all city codes. 9. Open Space Committee City Manager McGuire and Assistant City Manager Maglich presented copies of the 21 applicants. It was the consensus of the City Council that a procedure for member selection will be discussed at the Thursday, July 18 pre- agenda meeting. 10. Parade Update City Manager McGuire presented a brief update of the upcoming White Bear Avenue Fair Days Parade. 11. Study Commission Voting City Manager McGuire briefly reported on the ballots and voting for the Ramsey County Consolidation Study Commission. 07/15/91 3 E. OTHER BUSINESS There was no OTHER BUSINESS. F. FUTURE TOPICS The topics for future meetings are: 1. City Manager's Performance Evaluation 2. Maplewood In Motion Alternatives 3. Land Acquisition Update 4. MIA /POW Flag 5. Organized Collection 6. Transportation Issues 7. Take Home Car Policy 8. LMC Conference G. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:31 p.m. 07/15/91 4 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 22, 1991 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 91 -14 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Meeting No. 91 -13 (July 8, 1991) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No 91 -14 (July 8 1991), as corrected: Page 16 Item J.,2,b: "goal setting" Page 19 Item J.,7,e: "Seconded by Councilmember Zappa, Ayes - all" Item L.,4 a: "a report" Page 20 Item L.,S,f: "Rodeside Inn" Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Establish Clean Up Fund - 1992 2. Highway 61 & County Road C - 1196 East County Road C 3. Fire Hall - East County Line #2 4. Moratorium 5. Fall 1991 Clean Up 6. J -6, New Business: Request by applicant Schinander to dissolve 1961 agreement. 7. M -1, Schedule Council /Manager Meeting Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 1 7 -22 -91 F. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 375,558.20 $ 182.469.56 $ 558,027.76 PAYROLL: $ 199,538.38 $ 38.318.21 $ 237,856.59 $ 795.884.35 Checks #22626 - #22667 Dated 07 -01 -91 thru 07 -09 -91 Checks #14130 - #14247 Dated 07 -08 -91 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks dated 07 -05 -91 Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Employee Assistant Program Approved renewal of the City's contract with T.E.A.M. (Total Employee Assistance Management) for one year at the rate of $14.00 per employee. 3. Conway Ave. - No Parking Resolution Resolution 91 - 07 - 83 RESOLUTION TO RESTRICT PARKING ON STATE AID STREET WHEREAS, the design of Conway Avenue from T.H. 120 to McKnight Road does not provide for adequate width for parking under Minnesota State Aid requirements, and WHEREAS, the City desires to expend state aid funds on said street segment. THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Maplewood that parking on both sides of Conway Avenue from T.H. 120 to McKnight Road is prohibited at all times. 4. Budget Transfer - Sanitary Sewer Fund Authorized transfer of $1,200 to the Sewer Fund Telephone Account (601 -508- 000 -4310) from the Sewer Fund Contingency Account (601- 508 - 000 -4910) to pay for current and anticipated 1991 telephone bills for lift station lines. Mayor Bastian moved to continue Item G -1 until all interested parties arrive Seconded by Councilmember Zappa 2 Ayes - all 7 -22 -91 H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Beam Avenue, Project 88 -12 a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Irish presented the specifics of the report c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its approval 91 -07 -84 AWARD OF BIDS - PROJECT 88 -12 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of F. M. Frattalone in the amount of $886,787.40 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to County Road D, City Project 88 -12, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. FURTHERMORE, the project budget is amended to $1,164,000.00, and the project financing is amended as follows: Special Assessments $ 561,000.00 MSA 710.400.00 Total Financing $19271,400.00 (Excess of $107,400 to MSA Street Construction Fund) Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all d. Councilmember Zappa moved to consider use of the existing openings at Highway 61 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all e. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its approval: 91 -07 -85 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT - PROJECT 88 -12 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 88 -12 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 88 -12 Change Order One. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order One in the amount of $12,785.40. The project budget is amended to $1,284,200. The project financing is amended as follows: Minnesota State Aid $723,200 Special Assessments $561,000 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 3 7 -22 -91 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m. (7:20 p.m.), 2276 White Bear Ave. (Flemings Auto Service) Conditional Use Permit Revisions CDRB Appeal a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding an appeal of the CDRB decision on a request for a conditional use permit. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission Report. e. Board Member Holder presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Joe Fleming, the applicant Cheryl Glassel, representing the neighbors to the West Jim Glassel, 1775 E. Lark g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. h. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 -07 -86 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Joseph Fleming applied for a conditional use permit to redevelop his fuel station property. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2271 White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: Tract B Registered Land Survey No. 258, Ramsey County, MN WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The City Council granted a conditional use permit for this redevelopment on October 23, 1989. 2. The Planning Commission discussed changes to this approved plan on July 1, 1991. The recommended that the City Council approve said permit. 3. The City Council held a public hearing to consider the plan revisions on July 22, 1991. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 4 7 -22 -91 I . The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run- off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions. 1. All construction must comply with plans date - stamped April 9, 1991. The City Council may approve major changes after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The hours of operation for the gas and convenience store shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The hours of the car wash, lube bays and service bays shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 P.M. 3. The site shall be adequately drained from residential properties. 4. The station operator shall keep the existing catch basins free of trash and debris to allow proper drainage at all times. S. The station operator shall keep the fuel station premises properly maintained. He shall: a. Keep the fence repaired. b. Regularly remove any trash from the property. 5 7 -22 -91 c. Not store tires or other debris outside the building. 6. There shall be no external speakers. 7. This permit shall be subject to review after one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Juker g. Design Review Board Appeal I. Councilmember Zappa moved to take no action as to the appeal of the fence condition. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach 2. Councilmember Zappa withdrew his motion. 3. Councilmember Zappa Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 4. Mayor Bastian moved to remove the stop sign coming out Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 2. 7:30 p.m. (8:58 p.m.), Zoning Map Changes: Gall Ave. 8 Co. Rd. D (4 Votes) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding proposed changes to the zoning map for the Maplewood Meadows development. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner fisher presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Michael Holder, 2373 Gall Avenue Vicki Seltun, 2474 Gall Doug Jones, 2376 Gall Avenue f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved their adoption: 6 7 -22 -91 91 -07 -87 ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a change to the zoning map from R -2 (double dwellings) to R -1 (single dwellings). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at 3069 Bellaire Avenue. The legal description is: Lot 20, Block 2, Maplewood Meadows Addition. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On July 1, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on July 22, 1991. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all h. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved their adoption: 91 -07 -88 ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood initiated a change to the zoning map from R -2 (double dwellings) to R -1 (single dwellings). 7 7 -22 -91 WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at 2377 -2429 Gall Avenue, 2376 -2484 Gall Avenue and 2378 -2408 County Road D. The legal description is: Lots 3 -15, Block One and Lots 1 -17, Block Two of the Maplewood Meadows Addition. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On July 1, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on July 22, 1991. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 3. 7:40 p.m. (9:40 p.m.), Conditional Use Permit: Beam Ave. (County Library) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request from Ramsey County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow building a the parking lot and a portion of the Library building on land currently zoned F (farm residential). b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Dave Nicolai, Construction Manager, representing the Library Board e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 8 7 -22 -91 f. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its dootion 91 -07 -89 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Public Library applied for a conditional use permit to build a new branch library on property zoned Business Commercial (Modified). WHEREAS, this permit applies to the land at the southwest corner of Kennard Street and Beam Avenue. The legal description is: SUBJ TO RD OVER W SIDE AND EX E 910 FT THE S 356 FT OF N 712 FT OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 3 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 AND EX E 910 FT; THEN N 356 FT OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS) IN SECTION 3 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed changes to this approved plan on July 15, 1991. The recommended that the City Council approve said permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing to consider the plan revisions on July 22, 1991. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run- off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 9 7 -22 -91 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions. 1. All construction must follow the site plan, date - stamped May 24, 1991, and the changes required by the Community Design Review Board. The City Council may approve major changes after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The City Council shall review this permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in the City Code. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all H. AWARD OF BIDS - Continued 2. Conway Avenue, Project 91 -03 a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Engineer Irish presented the specifics of the report c. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 - 07 - 90 AWARD OF BIDS - PROJECT 91 -03 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the bid of Ashbach Construction in the amount of $181,675.10 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Conway Avenue- T.H.120 to McKnight Road, City Project 91 -03, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. FURTHERMORE, the project budget is amended to $225,000 and the project financing is amended as follows: Minnesota State Aid $225,000.00 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 10 7 -22 -91 3. 1991 Bituminous Overlay a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its approval: 91 -07 -91 AWARD OF BIDS - PROJECT 91 -04 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Tower Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of $62,799.50 is the lowest responsible bid for Maplewood Project 91 -04 Bituminous Overlay, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS IX J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Presentation of 1992 Proposed Budget a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 2. Holloway Avenue: Change in Approved Plans a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 3. White Bear Ave: Larpenteur to Frost Project 89 -12, Schedule Public Hearing a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 11 7 -22 -91 91 - 07 - 92 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of White Bear Avenue, Larpenteur Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 89 -12, by construction of new concrete pavement, storm sewer, signal installation and modification, replacement of sanitary sewer, and other related work under a cooperative agreement with the County of Ramsey, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on White Bear Avenue, Larpenteur Avenue to Frost Avenue, City Project 89 -12, by construction of new concrete pavement, storm sewer, signal installation and modification, replacement of sanitary sewer, and other related work under a cooperative agreement with the County of Ramsey is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost to the City of the improvement of $324,590. Total project cost is $1,542,383. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 26th day of August, 1991, at 7:00 p.m. to consider such improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 4. Appointment of Open Space Committee Members a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - CouncilmembersJuker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Carlson Motion Failed 12 7 -22 -91 c. Councilmember Juker moved to o� a 3. 2. 1 system (with 3 being There would be two ballots. 1 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Carlson 5. Proposed 1991 -1992 A.F.S.C.M.E. Contract Settlement a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to adopt the proposed settlement with of the AFSCME 1991 -1992 Labor Contract. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Establish Clean -Up Fund for 1992 a. Councilmember Zappa stated that after reviewing several properties he felt the City should establish a fund whereby the City could proceed to clean up troubled areas. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to refer the matter to staff for a report Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 2. Highway 61 and County Road C - 1186 East County Road C a. Councilmember Zappa Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 3. Fire Hall East County Line No. 2 a. Councilmember Rossbach Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 4. Moratorium a. Councilmember Rossbach stated the Council had discussed that if the City cannot take advantage of new construction taxes, then perhaps a moratorium can be enacted. 13 7 -22 -91 b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer to staff Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 5. Fall 1991 Clean -Up a b. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 6. Request to Dissolve Schinander Agreement a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 -07 -93 DISSOLUTION OF 1961 PLEASANTVIEW PARK AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 24, 1961, the Village of Maplewood entered into an Agreement with Walter C. Nemitz and Marie L. Nemitz, which contained agreements and restrictions relative to property platted as Pleasantview Park, in the Village of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provided that the owners of Pleasantview Park, their heirs and assigns, be responsible for the maintenance of any street or access facilities required of the property; and WHEREAS, the street and access facilities contemplated by said Agreement are currently in place and maintained by the City; and WHEREAS, said Agreement is of no further utility or benefit to any of the parties to the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to release the property platted as Pleasantview Park, located in Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, from the terms, obligations, and restrictions set forth in that certain Agreement entered on November 24, 1961. By this action, said Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 14 7 -22 -91 Mayor Bastian stated there are several locations that have deteriorated and the City should establish a Clean Up date this Fall which should be publicized in an all -out effort to clean up. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer to staff to research how _proposed legislation will affect the tax base of the City. 5. 6 Seconded by Mayor Bastian Fall 1991 Clean -Up a Q Ayes - all Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all Request to Dissolve Schinander Agreement a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian _introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 -07 -93 DISSOLUTION OF 1961 PLEASANTVIEW PARK AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 24, 1961, the Village of Maplewood entered into an Agreement with Walter C. Nemitz and Marie L. Nemitz, which contained agreements and restrictions relative to property platted as Pleasantview Park, in the Village of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provided that the owners of Pleasantview Park, their heirs and assigns, be responsible for the maintenance of any street or access facilities required of the property; and WHEREAS, the street and access facilities contemplated by said Agreement are currently in place and maintained by the City; and WHEREAS, said Agreement is of no further utility or benefit to any of the parties to the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to release the property platted as Pleasantview Park, located in Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, from the terms, obligations, and restrictions set forth in that certain Agreement entered on November 24, 1961. By this action, said Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 15 7 -22 -91 Mayor Bastian stated there are several locations that have deteriorated and the City should establish a Clean Up date this Fall which should be publicized in an all -out effort to clean up. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Schedule Council /Manager Meeting a. Mayor Bastian moved that the next Council /Manager Thursday, August 1. 1991 from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 10:04 p.m. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 16 7 -22 -91 COUNCIL /MANAGER MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 4:30 p.m., Thursday, August 1, 1991 Conference Room A, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in Conference Room A, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:31 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Councilperson Dale Carlson Councilperson Fran Juker Councilperson George Rossbach Councilperson Joseph Zappa Others Present: Present Present Present - Arrived at 4:40 p.m. Present Present City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Director of Community Development Geoff Olson Environmental Health Officer Bob Wenger Human Resource Director Gail Blackstone - Arrived at 5:30 p.m. C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following changes were made to the agenda: D. NEW BUSINESS 2. Recycling Charge 3. Zoning Hearings 4. LMC Conference Report 5. MIA /POW Flag 6. Transportation Issues 7. Timing Issues E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Other Organizations 8/1/91 3 Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Zappa and approved. Ayes: Bastian, Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa Absent: Juker D. NEW BUSINESS 1. Organized Collection Director of Community Development Olson and Environmental Health Officer Wenger presented the staff report which set forth four types of garbage collection and addressed thirteen other issues including billing responsibilities, recycling, yard waste, provision of carts, exemptions, and bar code systems. Following considerable discussion, Mayor Bastian moved that staff investigate whether or not the City can legally set the collected. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Zappa and approved. Councilperson Juker arrived at 4:40 p.m. Ayes: All 2. Recycling Charge City Manager McGuire reported that Ramsey County has agreed to continue the practice of collecting assessments on property tax statements to fund a curbside recycling program, and County staff wants to know if Maplewood would like to use that County service in lieu of the City doing its own collection through the sewer billings. Councilperson Rossbach moved that Ramsey County assess and collect all recycling program Ayes: Carlson, Rossbach, and Zappa Nays: Bastian and Juker 8/1/91 the City's proposed use of the current balance in the Recycling Program Fund. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and was approved. 3. Zoning Hearings Community Development Director Olson distributed a memorandum regarding two remaining areas to examine as part of the Comprehensive Plan update. In these areas, differences exist between the land use and the zoning designations, and the City Council had requested that public hearings be conducted to change one of the designations. It was the consensus of the City Council that separate public hearings should be conducted for 1) the Oswald property north of Larpenteur and east of the Burlington Northern Corridor and 2) 2500 - 2580 White Bear Avenue, and a separate hearing should not be held for a third area, the Pete Gilbert property south of Roselawn on 35E. Human Resource Director Gail Blackstone arrived at 5:30 p.m. 4. LMC Conference Report Mayor Bastian and Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa commented on their experiences at the LMC Annual Conference in Rochester in June. 5. MIA /POW Flag City Manager McGuire reported that the City has received several requests from veteran organizations to fly the MIA /POW flag at City Hall. Following some discussion, Councilperson Zappa moved that the City flying only the Federal, State and City flags. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Rossbach and was approved. Ayes: 6. All Transportation Issues Councilpersons Zappa and Rossbach reported on their meeting with N.E.S.T. administrator Judy Hutchinson in which they discussed no -show and cancellation rates, current funding of N.E.S.T. versus the Roseville transit system, and Maplewood's contractual obligation through 1991. It was the consensus of the Council that following the N.E.S.T. meeting on Wednesday, August 7th, Councilpersons Zappa and Rossbach would bring back more information to help the Council make a decision about future funding commitments. 8/1/91 3 7. Timing Issues City Manager McGuire asked the City Council how they would like to handle the presentation and review of the consultant's feasibility study on the proposed community center. It was the consensus of the City Council that the report be formally accepted at the August 12, 1991 City Council meeting and that the document be reviewed in detail at a Council /Manager meeting later in the month. E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Other organizations Councilmember Zappa reported that he recently attended a Municipal Legislative Commission meeting, and based on the membership dues, he questioned the value of the City's membership in the organization. It was the consensus of the Council that staff will copy and distribute to all Councilmembers background information about MLC and that more discussion about memberships will occur at the August 15th budget meeting. City Manager McGuire provided a brief update on progress of the Ramsey County Local Government Services Study Commission. In addition, he announced that the City's Employee Picnic is scheduled for Wednesday, August 28th, 5 :00 p.m. at Battle Creek Regional Park. Human Resource Director Blackstone reported that the arbitration with L.E.L.S. is scheduled to continue into a third day - Tuesday, August 6, 1991. G. The meeting was adjourned at 6:41 p.m. 8/1/91 AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: City Manager Finance Director APPROVAL OF CLAIMS August 5, 1991 Al4#► be couno i l : 1tod1f1e It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: AC COUNTS PAYABLE: $ 976,196.51 Checks # 22668 thru # 22765 Dated 07 -10 -91 thru 07 -31 -91 $ 325 Checks # 14255 thru # 14448 Dated 08 -12 -91 $ 1,301,199.99 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL $ 398,486.63 Payroll Checks dated 07 -19 -91 and 08 -02 -91 $ 76 Payroll Deductions dated 07 -19 -91 and 08 -02 -91 $ 475,261.82 Total Payroll $ 1, 776,461.81 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. tmc Attachments `- VuUCHREG CITY O MAPL E.WC+OD PAGE 1 s '� 0 8 /05/91 12_. 25 i iU R F� ► {'�: R _... _._ _ . _ _. _- -- _- ._ . � 2 3 VOUCHER/ .. .. .... ... 4 CHECK VENDOR C-HE::C VEND I TEM 15 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME OESCR IPf IC +N AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 i Z . ..� " 'T 5 0 7 / 19 1 S ARN � _ � c� � � r ..� � r m . m.___.m_._ _._�. �,. f f .�_... �. � � �... � _ ��, _ . � __... T � J �:�.. �, FT AML, A N !. RE.f=UND -UUPL. AY CN 1 36 -.66•m 3 � I8 I o 9 Z 33 02 11 07 . / . 10/91 H ALL, RUTH R UND DUEL PAY- C 1 t, 340 60 160 60 .60 t 11 2 670 842 0 7/10/91 STATE OF MINNESOTA T•A A/8 MI C: Zbj 000.00 25, 000.00 ! 12 ; 13 �:� F,71 .: # + 7 10i'a i i �`�.�.+ rE~ BENEF ITT FLANS ��f� �a/ r_�.. 000.00 000.00 1 1 =1 �u 15 14� Z ,673 !>5 14toG 07/1.0/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER L ICE N SE _.... -. _ _ - -- L I G E� ill ;� E Y � �,; i � � 1 5 , 2 50. 2 2 __._• ---- J ■ ;i 18 22 674 14040 07/11/91 CLERK. OF DISTRICT COURT CN" DRIVERS LIC ■ 116.00 116.00 ..�. 13, 753 13, 753 . .25 q 20 �: �.t 7 5 41 4 00 07 / 1 1 I9 1 MINN. S TATE TREA S URE R M V kN L I 'C « �. i 21 22 22976 54140 07/11/91 MINN. ETA t E. TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LI t . 457.00 457. I 23 24 e -e-677 131650 07/11/91 CITY OF SEATTLE DO i• S 11 0 0 15.00 1 26 22678 1 106019 0 / I « /9 CARVER, NICK VAC CK 9zU ' 1 �� 28 :::x:.6 1 �� 0400 07I 1 "e 91 3�ERT . OF fi!� NATURAL RE uUE� ;E� i��Ih LICENSE E 1�:iE` «c:�t� « a l i" 1 .29 _ - -0 661750 07/1 /91 - ; 30 �: �� IVC+R't'HERNt STATES +JW ,. ... F' LR t:lt . UTILITIES i E: 31 UTILITIES 7,�_5Z. «65 . 3 :5 12 32 33 2 z68 -1 541.4.00 0.7/1 MINN. S TREASURER M O TOR VEH .L.Ic. i4 � ��. �7 i� 9E��+.07 s , �35 22 682 5414 0 7 / 1 Z / 1 MINN. S TA T E A TREA ,:, . :,. 2 N. ,.► TE STATE DRIVER LIG. r.�:.�,.t,�� 6 -.+ � { i 4 4 t� E� 7 / 1 � / �+ 1 BROWN +..+ i� �V A Nf � C T , � I NC, '•t �.. . . _ _ . w � RA TS _ _. _ .:•; ..:..___._ ._._�._.. ._..__._ 609 - .. _ .. - .... - _ ; -- ....... w _ _.._......_... _ .. _......... _. _..__ . _... .._.... - R , I A WAE DE.D CCMS7 R COXTC 60 9 . 95 I 38 39 ZZ1684 541400 07 /15 /91 MI NN*. S T ATE. TREASURER LICENSE 6 91.00 6 91 . 00 is 40 i 1 41 22685 541 400 07/15/91 M STATE TREASURER LICENSE 13, 637.67 13 42 - _.._...__...... -_ �___ _ _ _._... ___._.__.,_.._ .�..._ _._.. _....,, 43 .: c : �• ;;� �r i 5 �. � 0 t7 U 7 f 1 � / `� 1. C C� i� 1+i E' L L i � T t�c � A L E C: '�' "' Z G R :�; ... :.._ ......_ � ..... ...................- ._......... ......__. __ ...,. .. _.. �.. .».., ._._n......_... _r._. _. _ ... _ :1 _ ......._ _. Y NDU LE R R R MAINtT /UT 183 183 45 2Z6 E , 7 7 61600 07 RON� PRINTING SUPPLIES- O FFICE. 9 �;�.�� t;,' _- _ _.- _....•. _._ __.._... - -- _ _ . _ _...._ _. _ I 47 2 r_-'88 470700 07 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLISHING :1'2 4 :3 48 L & FI 1 t;:ij 50 ZZ68 :7 7ZQ610 i 07/ POST MASTER POST s 000 ol 0o 14 07/16/ 1 MI S T A f E TRE • 4. 4 4 1 " 9 :j;;. 4. r �3 54 2 541 07 TREASURER 9� ` 9 •� . ., .... . ... - M INN . trt 1 N+ N ■ STATE T E .. ... LICENSE �. E, Nl C - , .. i tie Z269»` 541400 07/17/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER LICENSE 8,749.48 8 149 4 57 ,' .- _... ._ .. .. VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 �6 08/05/91 12:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER . . ............ FOR PERIOD 07 3 VOUCHER/ 4 f 4 CHE VENDOR CHECK VENDOR I T U M ITEM CHECK '51 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME nCQr0T F I CiM 24 2 2-* 7 0 1 541400 07/18/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 9sl59.01 91159 01 26 .`2 54.1400• 07/18/9 M 1 14 N STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS L I C 317.50 27 28 ZZ703 761400 07/18/91 ROHDE'S TREE SERVICE G ish i"i A - 890 .9 30 22704 260250 07/18/91 FACILITY SYr-,-TEMS,INC. EQUIPMEN71- OFF10E 143 .45 143.45 31 32 ZZ70.5. 880850 07/18/91 TRWIRECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT SEE COLLECTION AGENCY 20.00 20.00 34 22706 010466 07/18/91 A.T. T. COMMUNICATIONS T E L L. P H 0- W'. 142.00 35 TELEPHL 18.15 160. 1 15 it'll 36 1 3;, Z Z? - 1 6 5 07/18/91. A.T.. & T., COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 7 50 ` 0 22708 310550 07/19/91 GOPHER ELECTRIC CONTRAC*fORS 3544.00 3 .00 3 42 22709 190400 07/19/91 DEPT. OF NATURAL R.ESOURSES DNR LICENSE 78.00 78- 00 22710 190400 07/19/91 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE 113.00 113.00 461 z- 2- 480696 07/19/91 LOTUS CUSTOMER SUPPORT REPAIRS MTNCE %49.00 99.00 ' 41 O0-7-/I-1"19"/.9I C,OMM-I,..S,S, 1,QNER OF REVENUE FUEL OIL 5.90 FUEL OIL 9490 ii FUEL OIL 9.10 FUEL U IL i FUEL OIL 9. 9 FUEL OIL 16.30 54 FUEL OIL 14.10 FUEL OIL 121s,40 .99,Z4 56 22713 741 07/19/91 RAMSEY COUNTY LAND PURCHASE ----------- 5 61 s. 6 A r-1 U U N I AMOUN ZZ693 5, 4 1 4 DU 07/17/91 MINNO STATE TREASURER L ICE NSE. .... . ....... . ........... 679.50 679-50 ZZ694 40060,0 07/17/91 J.L. SHIELY. CO. J.L. SHIELY CO. z 085 -:$5 0 85 22695 531650 07/17/91 METRO WASTE CON7fROL COMMISSN • SAC PAYAOt.E 19,500.00 ----------- .......... ............. S AC RETAINER ... .............. ........ ... . ............... ........... . ..... ... ..... . .............. . .. ...... 1 95 .00- 19 . .:. 9 4. 41.0431 07/17/91. KELLEY, JOHN FEES FOR SERVICE 300.00 300.00 22"697 530595 07/17/91 MEREDITH, CECIL FEES FOR SERVICE 300.00 300.00 2 21 69 8 912210 07/17/91 VOMASTEK, JOHN F E E. IS FOR SERVICE 300.00 300.00 . ....... .. .. ...... ZZ69c! 140400 07/18/91 CLERK OF DISTRICT Ct)URT CNTY DRIVERS LIB 139-50 139-50 422 7 0 0 131350 07/18/91 CIRCUS �! PROGRAMS 135.00 135.00 24 2 2-* 7 0 1 541400 07/18/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 9sl59.01 91159 01 26 .`2 54.1400• 07/18/9 M 1 14 N STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS L I C 317.50 27 28 ZZ703 761400 07/18/91 ROHDE'S TREE SERVICE G ish i"i A - 890 .9 30 22704 260250 07/18/91 FACILITY SYr-,-TEMS,INC. EQUIPMEN71- OFF10E 143 .45 143.45 31 32 ZZ70.5. 880850 07/18/91 TRWIRECEIVABLES MANAGEMENT SEE COLLECTION AGENCY 20.00 20.00 34 22706 010466 07/18/91 A.T. T. COMMUNICATIONS T E L L. P H 0- W'. 142.00 35 TELEPHL 18.15 160. 1 15 it'll 36 1 3;, Z Z? - 1 6 5 07/18/91. A.T.. & T., COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 7 50 ` 0 22708 310550 07/19/91 GOPHER ELECTRIC CONTRAC*fORS 3544.00 3 .00 3 42 22709 190400 07/19/91 DEPT. OF NATURAL R.ESOURSES DNR LICENSE 78.00 78- 00 22710 190400 07/19/91 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE 113.00 113.00 461 z- 2- 480696 07/19/91 LOTUS CUSTOMER SUPPORT REPAIRS MTNCE %49.00 99.00 ' 41 O0-7-/I-1"19"/.9I C,OMM-I,..S,S, 1,QNER OF REVENUE FUEL OIL 5.90 FUEL OIL 9490 ii FUEL OIL 9.10 FUEL U IL i FUEL OIL 9. 9 FUEL OIL 16.30 54 FUEL OIL 14.10 FUEL OIL 121s,40 .99,Z4 56 22713 741 07/19/91 RAMSEY COUNTY LAND PURCHASE ----------- 5 61 s. 6 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 3 Ao os/05/91 12:Z5 VOUC.HER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ ....... ....... .... . ........... ..... CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 541440 07/19/91 T W L .91 7 2271 MINN. STATE TREASURER STAR SUR 8 SURTAX F" BL 34.04- SURTAX PBLw 1 613. 0 itr,� � .......... ...... .. . .. .... ..... .... ... . .. I ...... ...... ..... ..... .. I . ............... ............ lol 13, ZZ-715 541440 07/19/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER.STAX SURCHARGE PBL. * 31676.54 14 1 5 RETAINER 73.53- 3 603.01 16 OT/19/9i f ,1 7 1 6 5541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC4 10,093046 10 ;�,{ ................ ...... Z 16 2.717 541400 07/19/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER STA DRIVERS L.ICv 810.50 Es1 .50 17 ZZ71 8 7ZZ200 07/19/91 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE 10-N 10,561.54 52 ... ....... ....... . ...... ...... . ... ...... FUEL OIL ... ...... ........ 12.81 f-,g 5 3, PERA CON7 R 1 13 -9.99 4 2 r53 70 ZZ719 042550- 07/22/91 ASSOC, OF MN EMERGENCY MGRS 'TRAVEL I& 1 13AINING 40.00 40.00 55 2i 28 29 Z2720 231475 07/22/91 ED'S WOOD PRODUCTS OTHER CONSTR COSTS 185.00 185.00 ZZ721 :8 62 105 07 /z.. Z/`R i THE BANK PAUL FICA PAYABLE FED INC TAX PAY 9 A-E. 0 9 9 4 3; FICA CONTRIBUTIONS. 9 6 0 949 4 A 416 ill 3 36 1 , 37 22722 541400 07/22/91 MINN. STATE THE LICENSE 9 9,204.75 39 40 41 �* ZZ 7 2 3 54100 -4 07/22191 MINN. STATE TREASURER LICENSE 446 50 43 22724 560100 07/22/91 MN STATE COMMISSIONER STATE INC TAX PAY 7 v az 9 44 4r. ZZ725 862105 07/ZZ/91 'THE BANK OF ST. PAUL WAGE DEDUCTION 437.50 437.50 4 22726 7 0 0 07/22/91 '#ffPZL 1 — E R Abli Y ct LIFE PAYABLE 2" 2 5*00 2Z5.0 0 ZZ727 943500 07/ZZ/91 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE STATE INC TAX PAY 103 #36 103.36 22728 460560 07/23/91 LEARNKEY INC. SUPAPL TES -OFF ICE. 54.95 54.95 -26 0250 O7/ /9 1 FACIL SYS FACILITY..SYSTEMS 108.40.* 108.40 5 i 59 22730 541400 07/23/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER LICENSE.. . .......... 9 60 2x: 731 541400 07/Z3/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER LICENSE 569.00 569.00 227 091210 01/23/91 BRIGL.EY DONALD L REFUND. -AMB104543A 137.50 131i5o 66 67 51 e-Z733 350875 07/Z4/91 HOFFMAN CORNER OIL FUEL OIL 137.38 52 ... ....... ....... . ...... ...... . ... ...... FUEL OIL ... ...... ........ 12.81 f-,g 5 3, FUEL OIL 41.93 70 54 FUEL OIL 49.98 72 55 FUEL OIL h_.,4.6 FUEL OIL 57 FUEL ,& OIL 46 0 0 0 VOUGHF'EG 0 8 /05 /91 CITY OF MANL.EWuOD VOU CHER/CHECK R PAGE 4 ..... .............. . FOR PERIOD 07 3 VO UCHE R/ CHEC VENDOR __..._..-._ - .__ -- .- -- 5 NUMBER NUMBER ITki� ITEi� - -- - - - -- UA TE NAME DE;:;GR IF i IOiy C HEE:f: AMOUNT A M � i U iii T F UEL OIL 7 , 7.4 FUEL OIL f i g FUEL ��. o . _ - _ ... _ __ -- - - -- - -- _ OIL 8 FUEL & O IL -- - — 92.15 z FUEL & OIL. 4 5. 6 9 f OI FUEL E L s _._. - _ -.._ ..._ ........ _ .. _ 7 �:• 7 UEE 5711 FUEL & 01-L 37.8 F UE L OI _ � 10119 FUEL & r 0.43 FUEL & OIL. ICI 8.6 • 7.t FUEL � �� I L. � _,..�. - _- __... - - - - -- ---- T ---- - - - -- .- � - - - -- Z7. 03 s FU �: O I L 6 1- 90 _ FUEL OI 24 FUEL 01 L. _ FUEL f... - - • - IL [1. ' , FUEL & O IL T � - -- -- — — - -- FUEL & O 2 2 7 3 4 . _ - -- 9.7 J 61.5'x+ BUNKER HILL WAVE. POOL. - - -- FEES FOR SERVICE 7 1 198 G0 • 4 U `' WE : !J61 .. U .S .WE T G O M M IGAT I► 1 ELEF'H! "SHE TELEP f�#.iNf. -- - -� — -_ - — -- j - -- _ _ - - ---- -- _�` TELEF'i•�l.N TEL TELEPHONE 2 _ TELENf�i ENE _ _ 48.56 TELEPHONE 4 . 5 6 TELEPHONE: ._ -..._ . -_.. ..__- .... . ._.___. ...__:_ . -. - - Ji i TELEPHONE: 48 . 5 56 . ........ TELEPHLINE TEL ..... . ........,...,... TELEPHONE 54 .6 TELEPHONE :.:. --- 54 6 TELEPHON.f' , 7 c• E. H I'l IN - ....... . E H ON TELE ��N Z5 3" . 1 ....... � H � �: 192 .77 7 TELEPHONE: TELEPHON TELEPHLINEI •. �1 Y V+_ +UCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE �. f, �)%. l;+1 - 1 2 :25 __ -. _._ _ V+:�U H .R/ HE:. RE GI � ..... ...... FOR PERI 07 � 4 C• E C• K CHE V E IV IJ !7 R E: C K i t � 1 7 E_ _'M1 ....._�.._ CHECK VENDOR ... H I T E �f _._.. .. NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT f': � - -- R T ELEPHONE 41 E � l,�,i I n 1. I --- — ---- �:�. :4/ 1 MINN. STATEr TFcEASURE.R LICE:.N,�E 12, 073. 1C-+ 1�:, C�7S r 1 ,3 1 12 x 27 - � 7 541400 07 / 24 /9 1 MI NN. STATE TREASURER LICEN r � � LICEN�,E �1 c) 0 81Z ;a 2, 73 £:S0930 07 /2-4 9 1 TSCH IDA y SUSAN kEPUND -AML' 10432'6 2 00 25.00 ,5 16 _.. ,, 14t") �}t7ti 07/25/91 -- a -. .. _... _. . ...._ ._ .............. _ _�...__ - -- - - _ .__ _.._. �.. _._. - .._.. ..._ �. .. _ ., ..,. �_. 4. ._..... .. �.... �... ... . W. ............,...._........._ ....__........, >r .2r CLERK:. OF DISTRI COURT CNTY 1y �-y IZZ W ZZ-740 882500 07/25/91 TWIN CITY TESTING OUTS RENTAL 36 4 . 00 _... __ _.__..._..__. _:__....__:... -- 36 . ,n - - _ -- i 227 41 66 1 7+ b NORTHERN STATES POWER U TIL I T IE S i , 4 1 � FI ,. W. - W - _ _ _ ._ ..W... ..... ... _- ...�__....._.... _ __._ .- ........._.... _. _ UTILITIES 2 9 `` UTILITIES 4 123 �3 UTILITIES..91 � 31 UTIL '�3. 32 25 UTIL �, 7 .'S �3 76 UTILI T I y •� } 34 77 1 1. i r 4 iC.. 35 .__._ _ T I Lr x _TIE.., 4 1 6� 9;,r ,� - -- - - - -- U TIL I TI E S , .__....._ _ ._ _ __...LL._.u.�._._....,.W....,_ . y.. LL_. ... v... ...a..�u._...._...w...... �. q . ..u 3 . f _. ,_. w..._-.. . W.._ y._.._ WW_.._........._ ...._......_...�. 1 r 3 7 2� 18 30 22 5 41400 07 /25/91 MIN N. STATE TREASURER OR br 19 _ ....___ V E H L I C . :11 1 V - -- — 37 22745 54 140 : 0 07 /25/g1: MINN,. STATE TREASURER E'TA TE DRIVERS LICr � � � 42 �5S a 50 So 33 ?3 34 x,:.744 1 9U4DC1 U7 /,::6 /' 1 DEFT . C+F hiATURAL RES OUF?'SE:.S DhiFt LI CE:NSE 44.00 44.00 .`..y.,�4, . 35 4f> Z 47) �. Z 745 1 04 C)7 /26/91 DEPT. OF NATURAL RE aC +UR`�ES DNR LICENSE 7 . c�c� 7 a �:�D 471 — — -------- -- ----------- - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - 14 22746 843210 07 STEF rENSE:NV KEN HON0RAR I Uhf o M501 40 Z "Z 7 4 7 310710 c7 7 / Z 6 / 9 1 GOPHER E T A T E ONE-CALL, T N C . �� , ;.. _ ..... .............w..W.......... y......._... W......._.. �._. W_..._._.__........_. .- ..W__.._......w......_.__.._ _.._.- __._.__......_._.._.__ 5 '� C�.NTRACT �-YM. 40 "00 40.00 y531 41 r,, 42 22748 661750 07/26/:+1 NOR THERN ST ATES POWER UTILITIE - I 1 5� c� . 5 43 U - __ 6. 81 44 U T I L I T I E S g► ,,6 ' S, .. ._., _._.._._....... 4� .....: - _ _._....... __ ..Y....._........._ _.W.:.. __ ..... UTILITIES + r fJ 9 ! 16 UTILITIE 1 9 092 .64 1 i 351_. 5_7..� �r,l 48 22 541400. 0 7/ 26/ 9 1 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L IC. 9 1 Z6 . 88 9 1 1 r f vv 411 - - __ __ - -- -- -- -. -- ---. -. _ - -- - - -_ - - 50 2750 541400 07 MINN. STATES TREASURE R STATE:: DRIVERS' L.IC.. 5.11 5C� 511.50 s1! 51 Fr _.. - _... -...__.« y .._ ........ ....... 68 ..... 52 �: 1030650 t ? / 6 / 9 1 A lU D �i E A , D E L Y T E _ _. _. _... -_ _._....- _ .....__...._._.. _. _.__.._.__....... ....._ SAGES PART ... TIME 3.35 = . "'`5 54 2275: 5 41400 07/29/91 MINN. STATE TREASURER NSF _ . _ _- - -_ ___— -- - - ---- - - - - -- - - - __ 14 14 ,10 3 . 50 - 55 7. 'SS 27 753 541400 Ci7 /29 9 1 MINN. S TA TE TREASURER L ICErf SE 4'=�e N Ca{ 496 tyt;) /4 57 75 . VOUCHREG 08/05/91 1 2 5 VOUCHER/ V i E__ - N___ D__ _0 _R___ HECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ... ...... VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTE-R PAGE 6 ---- --------- ....... FOR PERIOD 07 VENDOR I TEM NAME ITEM CHECK DESCRIPYION AMk_JlJNT AMOUNT 22754 54Z785 07/29/91 MISSOURI DEPT OF CONSERVATION BOOKS .ZZ.755 66Z6 07/Z9/91 ZZ2756 130300 07/30/91 22757 541400 07/30/91 541400 07/30/91 22759 710350 07/3-0/91 PELLETIER CONSTRUCTION CO REFUND-BALANCE OF ESCROW ......... ___ .. ...... ... ... ... 750U00 20 18.00 NORWEST INVESTMENTS SERVICES ... .. ....... . ......... . .... PR P - ------_-------- 4s674.52 ul �,, � 22, 7 6 0 INTEREST PAYMENTS 6Z.04 5 0 3 5_ �1� 131 CHAP IN PUBLISHING .... ... .... ..... ..... LEGAL FISCAL 180.00 22 23 �� ....... .................. ............... ......... ....... 1 .1-31 0 0 17 0 MINN. STATE TREASURER LICENSE 24 ZZ761 110487 MINN. STATE TREASURER 'THERESE CARLSON PROGRAM SUPPLIES L ICE NSt__ 711 50 • 711.50 07/3-0/91 PELLETIER CONSTRUCTION CO REFUND-BALANCE OF ESCROW ......... ___ .. ...... ... ... ... 750U00 20 f 4b 157.36 21 22, 7 6 0 351410. .07/30/91 H:O-.V..E.RSON, B GUTAHMILLER, T RETURN OF SECURITY DEPOS 378.01 22 23 INTEREST 17 0 3 9 24 ZZ761 110487 07/31/91 'THERESE CARLSON PROGRAM SUPPLIES i )()! 25 26 TRAVEL & TRAINING. 5 .7 6 29.09 27 SUPPLIES-EQUIP 17 2 28 SUPPLIES-OF*FICE ...- _... 1 __ - . . . . . I . , . 78 SUPPL I S-OFFICE - 'I 25.90 13,fd 3d 11 TRAVEL & TRAINING FEES FOR 6.00 SERVICE 5.00 32 SUPPLIES-OFFICE iG 3:3 PROGRAM SUPPLIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3 3.3 6 34 MI I s c c cl 1.46 35 RP P R & MAIN-f/EQUI SUPPLIES-OFFICE 6.00 37 1 .00 146.37 1.lt'l 39 22762 720 600 07/31/91 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 3 00 31000,00 40 22763 0 1 z C 7 / --_3d 7.4 T Mi A REFUND-GRADING ESC,,Rb_W---- ; 0.00 42 INTEREST' 8.90 1 �, 22164 5.41400 07z - *�3" - I ,- / ,-,, , - Z , I - I --,, *"M"i - Nk - 1 , m ,,- � ,- " , * -,--- lw� , , " t STATE REASURER LICENSE .......... .. . i y 14 66Z.00 6-62.00 15 22765 541400 3 1 / MINN. STATE TREASURER LICENSE 16 -.17 .._.._ _._...... __._...,_.._. 14,16.05.50� �14 60.5.50 iltJ 14255 010575 08/12/91 ACE •HARDWARE MAINT MATERIAL 18 1.70 19 MAINT MATERIAL 180 • E-12 . 14256 020400 08/12/91 AIRSIGNAL, INC. OUTSIDE RENTAL-(-- "QUIP 19.50 19.50 2 14257 020825 08/12/91 ALL RITE. ELECTRIC COMPANY V EME__ N,l . ....... 98.5 •00 985.00 4 . ......... 14258 08/12/91 AMERI-DATA SYSTEM EQUIP-PURCHASED 5 5 0 14259 0 S I A.M.E.RICAN ENGINEERING TESTING OUTSIDL ENG114 FEES ............... .. ... ...... 1, 043, 9 5 1 95 ------------ IN 40 25 1 14266 0 050349 0 08/12191 A AURELIUS, K I RS TEN V VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 61.08 : :67-08 ;3;3 VOUCHRE~G CITY OF MAP'LEWOU AG F� E 7 '34i 0 8 /05 91 I .-Z5 .14267 0 0 6*1 000 0 VOUQHE,.R /CHE CK REGISTER RANI C:K, JOHN P PROGRAM SUPPLIE l 'Al � 35 _j 3 � 28 _ 14268 0 F OR P ERIOD 0 08/12/91 B BA'T'TERY TIRE WAREHOUSE S SUP'P'LIES VEHICLE 2 25.7:.:: 1 37f I30 S f VOUCHER .._ ._ .: -. CHEC1% :.. _ _... VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM -- 'CH�.GE ,I I 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 142 14 0 8 /1 2/9 1 A M ER ICAN ES HO MES . .Fu-rn� ES i,. ut I32, S �{ SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1 196.80 . 8 I NTERES T 7 1 1 000 ,27 40 ......... .. .... ... - - ----- 17 ,n 1:f cr 1'.�;ct;� u �'l1�: / 'a1 AMERICAN FAE'Ttl�lEFt MAINT MA1"EEiIAL _ ! 44.00 ,: ; I, SUPP'LIEE--VEHIC:LE. 65,66 168.5 !, � ,.; __ _ �' ° 434 00 t��/ l c /91 w ANDE & ASSOCI A TES LAND N D I M �1 E~ lEw N r 15 - o o o _ - - 17 to LAND IMPROVEMENT 15 9 DDD . 00 1 % , � 15 --...._..._.._.._..__.._.._.. _.__..._....._.._._._...._._.. _.y.._._... LAND IMPROVEMENT X00. . .. ..j „! , c LAND I M E=` R �:! V E t� E. i� T 15,000.00 +�. C� 0 * 00 2 i 18 1 4263 0 305510 08 /12 /9 1 AND ERSON , L ISA REFUND -FROG REC IS T FEE 6.00 6 .0 0 ; 51 q 20 2, 14264 031100 48 /12/91 APPEARANCE PLUS I� P R �t MAINT/VEHICLE 12000 `:. 1 �. , 0 0 ;2f; �^ << 22 14 265 040915 08 /12 /9 1 ARNALS AUTO S ERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE (46.50 _i j' 1 231 REPA MAINT VEHICLE 43 . 8.5 790.35 I 25 1 14266 0 050349 0 08/12191 A AURELIUS, K I RS TEN V VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 61.08 : :67-08 ;3;3 2G '34i 27 . .14267 0 0 6*1 000 0 08 /1 2/91 R RANI C:K, JOHN P PROGRAM SUPPLIE l l5 .t�t� � � 35 _j 3 � 28 _ 14268 0 061900 0 08/12/91 B BA'T'TERY TIRE WAREHOUSE S SUP'P'LIES VEHICLE 2 25.7:.:: 1 37f I30 S i / SUPPLIES VEH ICLE: 8 85.88 i /lol �, U UPP`LIE� ,-VEE IC: . .. I32, S SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1 196.80 . 8 864J7 4 43l 14:. '69 0 080 575 0 08/12/ 91 D D LUHM , CONNIE R REF % E6 .. _ _ ! 44.00 1427 0 0 8/1 2/ 91 1 B ARD OF WATER COMMIS UTILITIES 23. 62 ;27I U T It 1. TJ E _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 �. � I 381 UTILITIES 1060 U TIL.IIIEE" 12.1: UTILITIES � •.. _L �._�_.� ._�..._._u.....r........_�.. . _._..W ._. .....�.w.__.__v.y.. _......__ _ . 6.4 Es �.. �. y....__.._....._. v._.. y.....�.._.._....._.�.___..._.. _, �__...._... .._...�___........__.._...._... ��,s. i UTILITIES; 59.45 ��i 4 1421 U - r I L I T I E S _ ... __......_...___.._...____..... .._._.........._.._.__-----.._.._ ._____�__.---- _.____.__________ 43 UTILITIE 19. - - -.�. 2 51.06 45 14271 081 08 /1 2/9 1 SOHL I JOHN PROGRAM SUPP I ES 35. 35 00 'soi _.... _........ _.. _ _....... _.. _ _ .............................. ......_. . _.... -. ...._. ,. ...... __... ............ _......__......... _. _ _ ... _ - °......_,..._. _._.__.. _._..._ .. _...._.. _ - - - -- - 4 14272 081 325 08/ 12/91 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 19 192.45 ( 'f;3 48 �B4 4q 1 427 3 09 4, 25 U �. / 1� /� 1 I:+RE: PRO RE: .:: M+�� .,► 6.9 50 66. if; 14Z 091450 08/ BROWNING- - FERRIS I ND . FEES FOR SERVICE I CE 87 » 0t� 5f; _..._..._ _ ...._ _...__.�.._.._. _.._.._ _._......_ - _......_ . .. ._ ..... _ . _.._......_....._..... _ ....._..._............._.... _ . _. . FEES FOR SERVICE 174.00 1531 FEES FOR SERV 5O . 75 311.75 ►71 � X55 1427 1 08 BUILDER SQ UAR E - 1 MAINT MATERIAL 1 33.2 'r I 57 E......_....._.._..__ -- - _._. -. _.._.. _. ..._. _..__.._..._W.. _.__..W ..._W._ _... 75 a a { N f i VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE>n1CtOD PAGE 08 / 05 /91 12:25 VOUCHE REGISTER' FAR PERIOD 07 VOUC ; �I CHECK 1fENDCiR CHt "" ' }� VEND +_�R ITE:M ITEM CHEC NUMBER NUMBER DATE N ME _ 14286 130560 08/ 12/91 CHEMSE -- ARCH SUPPLI SUP'P'LIES- jANITORIAL 1;�.w.+. . ____.._�._.� _- ____.... -_ . a . -_ ;4'1! 1110 �.,. .. , D� /.1,./ 1 .H Il-'P 'EI+'I A SP F EES FOR CE ,. r, 7 � '� 17C� DD /l�.f 1 CU TUM F1RE - AFI�.IUIVT AMOUNT �i46 1 4 .7 :� 11027: - IZ/91 R MA E 1H «.. _. _ «. « _.., _ - ._ 15.00 1477 I loz T 08 /1 / 91 CA DE.NA VEHICLE A LLO WANCE Z3 Z 3 .96 LAND IMPROVEME.'_Ni V 14Z90 1.50-900. 0.$/1 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTA FiP'R MAINr /EQ 1 457 14278 110480 08/12/91 CAIN.. ON EQUIPMENT EQUIP—PURCHASED 1 7.00 151425 08/12/91 COMPUTERLAND EQU1P— OFF ICE 464.00 464.00 � SMALL TOOLS - 14279 110550 08/12/91 CARPENTER'S SMALL ENGINE,:: SUPPL-.IES EQUIP 31,00 31.00 (,6! 1 14280 110�11U 1 - 2 - / - 9 - - CAaDY, WILLIAM j.• F Eit} =UhiD —'RUG RFGxST F _._�..._-- - - - - -- -�•� f M. L • _ :::� . calf 1 4281 11 08 /1 2 / 9 1 CATCO SMALL TOOL 170 150 08/12/91 CURT I S 1000 SUPPLIES OFFICE Z, 23 Z . 1 0 !1l; GUPP'L I ES VEIH ICLE 4Z6 001 44Z 8'6 14Z8 1203 -Z5 08/12/91:. CELLULAR . O N E 'ELEP ONE TELEPHONE 1 4283 1 ZO3 75 08/ l Z CEMGTONE PRODUCTS COMPANY MA INT MATERIAL ....... .... 1 59.00 159. 1428 1 05.75 D / 2/91 CEN AUT+ RADIATOR H��P` RPi MAI N. C /VEH:E ALE •« 3V * DG1 Z3 0-00 {" 14Z85 - 130300 01_3 12 9 1 CHAF' Ihl F'UBLx S+d 1NG ,,� 3; i I ;'CAL 17 � . raCi 177.00 14286 130560 08/ 12/91 CHEMSE -- ARCH SUPPLI SUP'P'LIES- jANITORIAL 1;�.w.+. . ____.._�._.� _- ____.... -_ . a . -_ ;4'1! 1110 �.,. .. , D� /.1,./ 1 .H Il-'P 'EI+'I A SP F EES FOR CE ,. r, 7 � '� 4�..�5 17C� DD /l�.f 1 CU TUM F1RE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 6Z. 90 62.90 �i46 142 96 14288 131400 08 /12/91 CITIZENS LEAGUE SUPPLIES +GFI =IGE - 15.00 15.00 � 4 14 4Z 40,05 180410 LL.ATEF' ILIA RUB CLEAN TAG5. LAND IMPROVEME.'_Ni V 14Z90 1.50-900. 0.$/1 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTA FiP'R MAINr /EQ 1 457 14 _,57 } , 14.98 1 3018 0 0 14291 151425 08/12/91 COMPUTERLAND EQU1P— OFF ICE 464.00 464.00 is 2E 1 Pl I. J fNG i k00 •. DUPL COSTS 396 M,3z _ .... .,....:,. .39_5 -.. .3..2,... 1 42 93 .: 1 4 08/ COPY EQUIPMENT, INC. SU PPLI ES—OFFICE 13 . 55 '. 5 ;; l ' 14294 170 150 08/12/91 CURT I S 1000 SUPPLIES OFFICE Z, 23 Z . 1 0 !1l; 4�..�5 17C� DD /l�.f 1 CU TUM F1RE SUPPLIES VEHICLE 6Z. 90 62.90 142 96 18 0400 08/ 1 Z/91 DAILY SON DAILY tw ��R �u N 'LAC } -:' „ � 14297 180410 08112/91 DAILY. & S DLACKTOPPING LAND IMPROVEME.'_Ni 9 DAILY :h SON DLAC K 'ss - ' P _ - 14,23 , 14.98 1 3018 0 0 08/12/91 DALCO S U PPLIES JANITORIAL 38 1 � SUF'F`L ES U I JAN T :C RIAL 83y40 121 5 6 1430T _.._.. COMPANY, 230900 08/12 - — — oe/xZ/ 1 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE EGGHEAD _ . ` uurL COSTS| COSTS ` o� DUPL COSTS 85.79 37 FOR PERIOD 07 32 DUPL COSTS 229.18 40 DUPL C.OSTS 237i,64 36,48 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM HECK COSTS NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT oupL ooaro 40.18 47 10 DUPL COSTS 206.94 48 DUPL 14299 181300 DATA DISPATCH 65w76 34-33. -- H .14300 1-90060 08/12/91 DEGE GARDEN CENTER PROGRAM SUPPLIES DUPL COSTS 249.07 975.20 14301 Z00490 08/12/91 DIEBEL GERALD VEHICLE At.LOWANCE 16.38 16.38 1430.8 08/12/91 DUCHARME 161.02 20 TRAVEL & TRAINING 10.16 14304 220100 08/12/91 DULUTH CITY OF TRAVEL & TRAINING 50.00 50.00 1 4'21 05 23022 5 08J12/9i E''. K..QUEHL SUPPLIES—OFFICE 501 .37 DEPT. TRAVEL TRAINING 1 29 14306 230500 08/127/91 EAST CO LINE FIRE. 4 9 3 e-:_-'O . 0 0 4 1430T _.._.. COMPANY, 230900 08/12 - — — oe/xZ/ 1 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE EGGHEAD _ . ` uurL COSTS| COSTS ` o� DUPL COSTS 85.79 37 32 DUPL COSTS 229.18 40 DUPL C.OSTS 237i,64 36,48 14308 2 *3 0 9-0 1, 08112/91 EASTMAN KODAK CREDIT CORP. DU-PL COSTS oupL ooaro 40.18 47 10 DUPL COSTS 206.94 48 DUPL COSTS mOe/g 34-33. -- � DUPL COSTS 2.40619 52 DUPL COSTS 249.07 975.20 53 1*oon 14310 231650 oe/xZ/ 1 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE EGGHEAD 579.00 579.00 14312 240375 08/12/91 EMERGENCY APPARATUS mAzmr. INC npn u mxzwT/vE*zoLE 1+313 250Zno 08/12/91 Eoa BnoT*Ena & oows INC. Eao enoe m eoma INC* 08/12/91 EVERGREEN L��N�— — --- ----- FEES FOR SERVICE ........ . .. . .............. 204.12 .204 .12 1 1 1 7 10 0.0 105.00 105.00 � --'- 260Z5 08/lZ/91 FACILITY SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.95 90.95 121 14316 260286 08/12/91 FAMILY SERV d VOUCHREG i 12 CITY OF M AF`LE W O O D _ 0 8 /0 5 / 9 1 _.__ ......... I u'TER AGE 10 M 2 FOR PERIOD _ 3 V O UCHE R / 4 VEN - _ I ,, 1 5 6 NUMBER N U MB R U A 'T E N A N E I T' DESCRIPTION - -I T E -__� -- - - -- -- - - - -- - - CH ECK __ 7 f ' : / 1 F Al L IL — MA STER CORPORATION � ........._ ........_.... _ ...._ . _ _..,..- ...__.._... _....,... -.... _...._ S U PPLIES AMOUNT AMOUNT b VEHICLE 3_. 9 m........, ,.m_.......�.__ c.. -_.. - _.r_.._ 16 3 . 92 10 X31 ? I Q ,, 0 8 / 1 Z/ F L YNN — G AMMON I.- __�.. JU_....._ _ __DITH ! - -__... R I � T i + E - E U D - G REG it � � 11 12 14319 28 U Et / 1 2 / �+ 1 FOREST F' R � t D U C T' S S U F' �'t. Y Co. C .�. -• - __ ---- -_ -- S �. PPL.I O FF IGE M — ___, - - -- t �" � t�l - ---- -- �' 1 �` 13 1 4 3 Z .00500 ..... ...... 1 f .; %'t -� i ia I 4 11 E. R M S CLOTHING 242 1 15 1 G UNIFORMS U N I F U R M + 17 14 •� w 1 3 02 700 { 8/12/91 "� GLEN RENDEIN EXCAVATING LAND IMPROVEMENT 4 _ ; 19 _.. .....,. .. _ .. _....- - LAND I �� . . 6 t 1 20 - - - _ L.. AND IMPROV - - -- -- -- _ -• - - 1 .. .8 1 0 # 1 � : o .._.. 1 21 LAND IM P R OVE M ENT C ON TRAC TS 1 4,6 00 . G0 P TA INAyE Z .�. X84 23 24 14322 30290 0 8/12/91 GLENN IN G 1.E. N�:.t>CiD J U1�JE: BILLING IN Ci . _. _,......._� T._. .. __ -. . 1 Fib COMPANY _.,-_ _ - - - �. w 0 5 ' t 25 26 � _ R k ! -AIR M A jI 27- 28 - _ 1 4324. •,� �'��+��}.� GOPHER D �a� u ,�AL � �" �' —__._ :.. —___._ _.___ _._._._- _ FEES F O R GE .. � s.i. I 29 .._ _.- .S ER VI C E FEES SERVICE � �. �• _ 11 yj 8 f ,�, " mot tt 30 3, 143;'' 310850 U;_• 1 /� 1 m..,., �.., _ Gt�VERNNk NfT' TRAINING SER _- .r....,.,. TRAVEL A Y E. L TRAINING 2?5 . x.1 4 .5 j +I 3 2 143Z6 3 3 Chu /12 /'.91 GRAY�;OW— DANIELS CO. . 1�4.DD 194.00 to 1 33 k. �_ SUPPLI 1 c 10 .7 5 ;► 11 : 14 . i n 14 32 _ .. U L. I 1. L A , JUDY R E f 1 E. F E E . 3b _ • ��_ 08 1 _ �/1 LIB GRUBER' G POWE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIE .,. 4 '.;. 131.00 �. 138 _ FEES FO ! �ss 401 �. � + 33Gt 55 C� / 12/91 HV J OHNSTON GLJLVERT CO. ___ -- - .. _.__.__ - A I hi T 11 b .� 3 0: T 4 1 42. 3 3 3 U V _� C� D �,� / 1 c. /X11 H x D T R A T H � ASSOCIATE '= .�SOCI AT ES INC. I NC '� I NSUR A NC E � N s"! U R A N �• E. 6 ? u 43 - .._._..__ .i 4 •.� � 1 _ _ _ __ _ •.� 3 � 1 � _ __ . _. _ _ __._._. _ " .....___.__ .. _....... aC A 1U Y .. _. -.._ ... _ .. - .._....._.._ ..._ _.__....._ �:. , r� � U r V �./ 2 9 7 50 . 0 0 �:)•l i 44 TENA 3 ,t _ ...' 4',i 14 340 075 0 8 / 1 2/9 1 H E AV ER DESIGN CONJt . INC. AD INL�SCf�Ut » 1 . 3 0 1 7 ' :._. 3 �'� _. -.... _._. _., -.. ..._ ... . -,-. 1 , DDD Dt} ._.- .._....._ -.�. .._....,._ ._..........___�_...__._..____ 1_ � w Ci U y U 1b �' 4 to 1 1 �.+ c � i� / 1 ! ti 1 a H E J h1 l RENTALS, INC; OUTSIDE OUTSIDE RENTAL E QUI F' _.- _._..._ _U .. �J�D 19 _._..... ._ _ ... _._._ __. m......_ . -..... - _. .............. .... ......... _ .... _ _ UUTS ID TAL. E. RENTAL 75 00 h � io 14334 340113 CAS/ 12/91 HEL..EPOLOE 1 SLOAN .. _ . _._. _. � 1 2 3 7. 00 _ . .1 9 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE V EH I CL r w ; U151 12 �. A LL OW ANCE 1 3 ..._.... I C L E A LLOWANC E - ..�.___ -.. —_. _ �,.,, 4 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE ' 1433. .�4.10 5 NERIaLFt TODD f •f .� 8 r> VEHICLE ALLOWANCE _ � Z I j - .. ..� 7 VEHICLE AL.L..OWANC - �r. w ...... _ _. _ .. ....... 49 . 92 t d VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWiYOD PAGE 11 'F 0 0 5 l91 12:2 V /CH REG FOR PERIOD 07 f f 3. i ...... 9 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR _ ITEM . _ _ CHECK .. NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION N AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 _ 143.6 318 96_9 08/12/91 INCORVAwA, CAROLYN REF UND PR 'RE:. S`7 FEE., I r. 0.00 14.�.�7 400100 . 08/1 2 /91 J.A DI�,TRIDUTING, INC. xhtG EQUIP- PURCHASED 540 540. 14338 4 00950 08/12/91 JEAN THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE FEES FOR SERVICE 316 TEMP.WAGES 528.00 i3 TEMP SERVICE 468,60 1 ., 171 339 400975 083 2 / JEFFER HOME REFUND E SCROW 1LL_ �� -_o ._...:y W._ _W:v...�..._,_._. _:.._._�.._......... � � ta>� sy it I NTE R E S T 11.78 2i1 17 i„ 1434 40190 08/12/91 JOLLY TYME FAVORS PROGRAM S UPPLIES j 376 3 9 � 5%D .;,l. - , PROGRAM PPP. I E f ,� r w 11 20 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 34.,:�i� 2 71 21 : _ _ .. ._.._._ . _. _ _ _ 14; 41 402100 UE /12/' 1 JOURNAL OF CIVIL DEFENSE ME:.I+fT-. +E.RSH. '" • � �-� ' 22 I'In 23 31 24 14:x:42 41050 DS/12/91 KENN JOHN J. LEGAL :3: FISCAL ;3 ,Fiil M L EGAL FISCAL. - 325.00 331 . I3^ ESC _N 4.�4.� 410900 Q /1.�I' 1 �' LAND HOMES REFUND-GRADING -- -- -- _�.�._� _,.r_U.. _._.� ..__._.�__..W _..�........ �._._. ��. _.WY_WW _._._._ _...w_.._ 12 ,R r+ f+� iJ 1 r r 1 r'+ 1 ';r • +� 1 9 5 . 3 8 3P 9 14: 44 4 08/1 KINt. S C OPIES CONTRACT PYM.. 39 ..., r., �,� , ,, PROGRAM SUPPL I E S T 7 46 T,4 1� i1, 14 .,, 45 4 3 0 .3. 0 1 0 / 12 1 E�. .. 32 -1;ti .+ +y 9 j X COMMERCIAL CR M AI N T E N AN�•E:: MA TERIAL � .w � �. w. W._. W ._._ ..._..___...... 11 1434 4 30 400 CZc�I /. 1 fthil.� Cpl C - ....._._. � L� 2 L a . �4 ...� .: 45 34 35 14347 X47 4305.0 08/12/91 KODALUX PROCESSING SERVICES OTHER CONSTR COSTS 5 .55 5 .55 � a; PROGRAM SUPPLIES. - 4 0, 1 7 1 1 40 71 `37 1 4:;48 4.30800 D� / 1 �/� 1 � O-KESH ATHLETIC 1 19 _.. _ - 1 4. 4 9 4 5 0 1 �. 5 D 8/ 1 i» _ J 91 L. E r T r N■ TRAVEL 4r T R A I N I N C, Y..._.._ _�__ W �..... -_ .. _ ._� ... � _....... _. W.. W...... y _._... _. ........ _._. ,. - 4 ... .. _ _.... -- ... ._. . . - . . - . . -1-1- 4 n rvl I , 14350 450800 08/ 1 /9 1 LAk;ELANI� FORD SUPPLIES VEHCI EL 181.54 1 C11 . F4 1 5 j i ` 42 CEN TER SUPPLIES�-.VEHI�.r I.,E 1 2 4.6. �� 1 «6' 43_ _ 14351 45ia5 LAi�ELAN TRUC i-,.ti t� 4�i �:SCJ P + 1 4,�5a' / 1 �: /� 1 L AMOTTE CCIMPANY SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 29610 _ __..._ �=.`�'.1 0 ^5 47 14353 451550 08/12/91 LANDSCAPE ALTERNATIVE LAND IMPRlt3fEf"1EIVT Z78.55 , -! G: hR _ _ _ - -_�- -_ - - - -- - - - - -- _ - - - -- -- _ — - - -- — — - - -- - _ q �__ - T "IE:.,� �UL MLM�E~#��NP an 14:354 460520 0 /12./.• 1 LE:.AGIJE �.F M►►) C'I 50 5 14:355 4TD700 08/12/91 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS PUBLISHING 148.67 .. .... ...... ........ .__.. ... ..... _ _-... _ .._........ __ .._._........._......... -__ ......._......._ ............... - 66 4 1 1 �� , 54 14356 480 08/lZ /91 ANN R 1..OEFFLER, REFUND -- REGI ST..._ F ' ' - - -_.__. _. -- - ---- -�' - _ -- -- -....- - - -- - - - -- ~' _..: - - -- _ ■ijC� 1 ■ s'�iy �, i 5 _ - - - -- - - -- __ - - - - - - - _.._ - - - 57' 490 0E , / 12/91 L.UND ROXANNE:: RE.F= UND-PROG REGI FEES Z_ .D� 5 fi � 4X , li � i fi ® VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 08 /05/91 1 r - .. . ............ ................ PAGE 1: VOUC R / �' • HE. VO . - TER FOR PERIOD 07 r i 2 11{ 3 VOU C HER/ :i CHECK VEIVD+�R VE�>y� ++R _..__...... __ ... � I TE.M ITEM - �CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DA NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 61 6 7 143 8. 5,01225 08112/91 MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT CHEMICALS 1 7 -8; ; 0 - -� 8 SUPPLIES-.VEHICL 75.0 Z53.00 .. ...._._._... - - - - -- 12 10 14359 5015:0 08/12/91 MA IER ETE.WART & ASSOC. j CON RACT PYM. - -- 9 91879.62 13 12 1 4 3 6 0 511 3 2 5 0 / 1 Z / 9 1 M ART INEi►N ROBERT P RE GIST � S 13 - - - , R E i G t� ��= 13 14 14361 511600 08/12/91 MA C CRP R R P � � � r � lit; +.� M M / E . U .321 . 15 EQUIP-OFFICE , �0 00 � ��4 «50 f s 1 6 3 - _ , N 17 14362 511750 08/12/91 MAUT.% PAINT COMPANY SUPPLIES-JANITORIAL 12.45 12.45 18 Jo METRO I FEES FOR SERVIC t S 19 1 4 •..r � � 5 3130 c� � / 1 �: / �+ �. :' � SERVI 1 e}�' -- 7 - ...__._. .... ] ..__.._.._._ I'()I 21 4 1. G'5 / !.9 : TER TRAVEL <•..�. TRAIL! ING 22 I 1 23 1 4365 5 3 1 ? 5 0 0 rr � C� " �., �, r- � j :illl �/1Z/91 MEYER ENTERPRISES SUPPLIES- - VEHICLE 135.00 135. 25 1.4366 54 0 4 9 0 2 1 MI JOAN i E F U N D P R Ci R EGIST . FE ES 13.00 13.00 26 {.s4 27 1 4'47 5 :0.. 4 1 . "' m 1 . NV cclmMM OU R f k AL QU1 "J1 O C 91 ,3c' 29 1436 8 5.41 � 37 I 38 M �0 0�/1�/'�1 MINNESOTA CONWAY C +�NWAY FIRE. � SAFETY UN:tF +_iRhl� �:� C:Li. +THlhi{� 7'�.Ot� 75��.Ut� � � 30 , 3. ,� ,.�.4 .: 0 3/ 1x,/9'.1 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPAE , I N LAND IMPROVEMENT 8. (35.. �....: 4 32 , ' j 1zl CONT P.AY`�-RETAINAGL 1 +�;�7 ;.t�0- 7 .�:'S ( 1 33 - 4 3 -.x 1470 561050 8/1 50 0 MN U.C. FUND � - UNEMP`L ..i ► MNT COMP INS f 5 z �-. - 5 ,45 35 �46� 36 14371 570050 08 /12/_91 MOBILE EMERGENCY SYSTEM R :l'NT /EQUIP 176.0 48 INC N �: A � M • 1 T _ V0 9 RP`R & . MAINT /VEHICLE * ; *�0 � 500 75� 38 5(11 39 143:7. 570 X10 08/1, MO fOR OLA 9 INC RPR MAID!' /RAUI0 40.. 40 5:, 1 41 14373 610200 08/ 1 Z/91 MULWEE GEORGE UNIFORMS & CLOTHIN Z0 Zo 0 0 1 I 4 421 43 14 3. ? �} •.. V i � %;.� .. l � I � w. f �r' J.: 1?i \.• R R r" R � M A I!�1 . T ! E 4� U I � m _. _., r fy 0 58.00 44 45 14375 6608 08 / 1 »/9 1 NOR ST. � 1 , 4 � CITY OF UTILITIES uTILITrES 12 81 s;1 t 47 UTILITIES 1 ! 517 :5'' 49 14.7 1.755 t8 /1,:. /a+1 IV�GfirMERrI S P'i:+WEt _...•_ - 50 U T I L. 11' I E 701.39 c5 U TILITIES 7 477.16. � 2,6 51.y F r . �J gy _..... ,.. ...... ._. . ..,„.. ... - -..., _..,..._ ._ .....:.. w��w.......__..........+a -.-... 9 L � 'TRAI �� ;� ��_�..�.. �: 7 �.� 4 0 54 T, 14 6 �. 0 0 8 / 1 2 / 9 1 O CT O PU S CA WA R MA 1 N1' VEHICLE 21 7 . 50 2 17 . ..... _. .. :. 55 56 14379 700675 08/1 RA.KOY GENE F EES FOR SERVICE 12, 385. 70 1 3O5.7 V 57 ...... _._ _....._........ __. __,_. w -_.. __-- - - - - -- .._.._ -.__._ _.._- -... _._ _.. _. ....... ____. - - -. io i VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPL.EWC1 + +D PAGE 13 { t't n . ..UCHER /C:HEC1+'L REGISTE F PE 0 7 VOUCHER/ 3� CHECK VENDOR CHECK VEND 3R I ITEM CHECK �! � N UMBER NUMBER DATE N DE SCRIPTION A MOUNT AMOUNT w 14380 710200 45/ PECK AI � r..:.•_ a ... _.__ _ - xl yENilVI t�HICLE .L�li1tV o �19 TRAVEL & TRAINING 9 »;��, �1 4 1r! I �' I 10i 14381 711345 08/12/ PETERSON, YELL, CC' +LAVER SE & JEN! SEN FEES FOR SERVICE 4 y 600 00 1:3i i' FEES FOR SERVICE � 14382 7114+ 08/12/91 PETERSE: ►N LYDIA fiE� = UNE�- F'�iC�� RED �_._ _ : � r , ; _a,_.___w�_ �. ,V_ " 4 3T _ 44 r 0 44-.00 17 1 R � X 1 4 3. � 7.1.134 0 PE TERS0N KA_Y t+� t�E1-�� C:C.,E ALLOWANCE + � , 1F, VEHICLt ALLOWANCE 6 Eto�, Y ?11 17 i VEHICLE. ALLOWANCE 1 � , �i't� �?'! t VEHICLE AL LOWANC E .,:.. ,a w 20 14384 7 ' 1 1400 08 /' 1 MAINTENANCE FEES FOR SERVICE .��:. �.. 1 z� �► 2 21 22 14385 T11 08/12/91 F'H 6.8 i 23 FEES FOR SERVICE 13,42 2C r 5 24 1 i 25 14. 86 711T00 D.S /.1 ./91 'ICiNtEER .RIM SUPPLIES-VEHICLE 26 3,11 1 27 14357 7 Da/1 2/91 PRECISI BUS S SUPP LIES OFFICE 1 ,;� r , �.� .... 1, .w 1,�. 026 4.� 37 I29 14388 721 100 DS/ i 2/91 PR IE BE, WILLIAM M . VEHICLE ALLOWANCE I r3 .00 173.00 :10 3:)1 o 31 t48819 721600 08, / 12/9' 1 PRYOR FiES +I C•ES � x NC• r TRAVEL T'FiA I NINA 9'�' w 't�C� . �'� � 00 1 1� 3' i " 1- =- -- -- - - - - -- 14390 73 04.20 Da/ 12/9 1 QU I COLEY , LARRY REFUND - GRADING ESCROW 1 0 0 � ..... .... . :34 451 N ..5 14391 730 525 08/12/91 QUITTER - SPENCER, SUSAN REFUND -PROD REGIST FEES 13.00 13.00 {, 4 f , •�,^� ,,, } 37 14592 7409 00 S.I1 / 1 RA 10 L'S SHACF ACCOUNTS RE EIV, L SUF'F'LIES E UIP t_ Pi 30 0. I �? Soy :1 <, 14; 93 74098.0 08 /12/91 RAHNI, CARY VEHICLE. AL O WANC E �� W _ .� y.W �.� _ :._.__ _..:.� __. __._._ — - - _ _ _ 40 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE .wy.._r M__..,.. _ _y. �. �.� W....... .... ..._..._.__...............�.u. _� :�_ r f � r,1 �� 1 „ 112 14394 741200 08 /12/911 RAINBOW F OODS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 5r, : r , PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7! ii w, lSEi 1 PROGRAM SUPPLIES .,4 .47- PROGRAM 5UF'f''l. I ES 12.42 4e PROGRAM SUPPLIES Z1.50 �, r , 1 47 r 7 I^! 48 14 395 741 3 30 0 RAMSEY CO UNTY Y DATA PROCESSING CON J P.YM. 1 w4 . 1 7 i �4 . 17 �.1 - . _ ._..... _ . _ _ _.. _ 4q fi 1 50 14396 741 o;a /1Z/91 RAMSEY COUNTY POSTAGE 42 *75 E1;4 t ...... ........ . .. 51 0 P +'STAGE n7 . � . �. ......._.�_V I C E 4 0 - ...............:_ .. ................- ...._- ..._.... .._ FEE �O SERVICE R �� 0 .- .___.._..._... ._. __.. __._........._..._...- __....... -_.. . __._..._.._ I M * V1 o ��' -* `�' � 1 `3 54� 14: 7 421 1D D 8/ 1 /91 RAM BEY EMER.G . MEDICAL SERVICES C:ES SUF'FIL.I E --EQUIP _ 55 _ - _ _.._ _..... - -- - - -- - -- - _ -- - - -- -- - - -- - -- - -- 731 5r, 1 0 . r s n i 1 143` 8 75t 60$5 REGIS, CHRIS, VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 35.10 + I r TRAVEL. TRAINING 6.06. 41 r .1t� ' _ ...- .._..._.._..___ .............._.__W.._ . _..._._..__W._.._ .___. __V _..W._.._. -..W_ ...__............... _....:. _.._.._. _......... _.... _._.... io VOUCHREG C I T Y OF MAPLES OOD PAGE 14 1 o E.' /o! / 91 .12 25 _ .... ............ . ... VOU,CHE:.R /C:HF CFti: REGI TER FOR _ ......... PERIOD 07 3 VOUCH C. H E C K VENDOR C H E C KV E N D O R ITEM - ITEM CHECK:•; 5 6 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT j �I � 7 i*3 08 /IZ /9 1 RIE.DE.EEL,TOM _m _.........,. ... VE;.H.1 CLE ALLOWANCE _...... - 1 .04 _. 1 _.. . w 04 i <,I 8 j 10 j 9 14400 751330 08/ . � RIE C ARROLL MULLER ASSOC UUT� IDE �i I IhiG ;� D '�a$ , U D:� 1 'I 10 �t3I 11 1440.1 761300 08/12 ROADRUNNER DELIVER SERVICE 58 .00 58 .00 I 12, 1 � � ca 2 770310 � � / 1 � / � 1 R U T T G E R � 1 BAY LAKE L ODGE .. .. .. ..., _ ... _..... - _. ..._.........,..._ ._. _ ,._.. _.,.. .�...__.�.�. ... .... TRAVEL TRAINING _..._... 60 .00 60.0 � 14 15 1440 770900 .0 1 2/91 R :YDER TRANSPORTATION RYDE:. TRANSPORTATION 1 16 � RYDER TRANSPORTA 118.00 316. z 181 14 404 780300 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES-OFFICE 97.44 SU -GF• I 163.77 j 20 21 1.4405 780460 08 ...SAFETY . t LEEN C ORP F EES F OR SERV 75. Z5 75. 25 23 14406 790143 08/12/91 SCHMITZ, JEAN REFUND- P REGIST FEES 9,00 r w UU �2 4 ; j 35 14407, -03f 0 08/ 1Z /91 SKL+N &. SKr..'N AUTO INC REPAIR MA INT. VEH ICLE 135.00 ... - - i? 135.0- ,s 3.3 27 '!+ ' x.' `} 08/1 SM 1TH- - NE.L SON INC. _ E SC R O W RE. f UlD GR .E1Ci - 1 00 . 00 js!;I 28 INT 6 .16 1 0 0 6 . 1 6 i:37 13kti: L 9 30 14409 831 524 08/12/91 E.1. , MARY SP IELVOG , REI=UND P a RECiI FE - RO S FEES 4 w �\! 44. 00 32 14410 831555.: 08/ SPRINGS FEES- CONSULT JNG $, 101.87 #, :33 : S P S OF F I CE PR - __. -_--_ _-- - - - - -- - - -- - - -- ---- ---- -- .�� r : ; _ � UPPI.I FFICE 71.7 -'_ ._- -~-- -- a31 4 ,'� , 34 14411 83160 0 35 SUPPLIES-OFFICE 15.1 36 - 35 ; 37 1 S UPPLIES-OFF - ICE - 2 . 93 - Iilr 38 SUPPLIES- Of: 55,' 7 ;° SUPP LIES-OFFICE .�UFFLIES F FICE 2._• . 4 .:. :.: 41 SUPPLIES-OFFICE 51.60 I 4? - S UPPLI ES OFF E ' ^' ;�' 4: 3 S UPPLI ES - OF FICE h 44 SUPPLIES-OFFIC 78.71 k3 45 S UPPLIES -OFFICE ar - SUPPL I ES ICE __ 3 `� . 3 4� -____ 5 49.7 6 47 48 - .. - . 8 40340 .�..w 08 / I Z/91 ,...SST . PAUL CANDY & TOBACCO % INC. PROGRAM S'UP'PLIES :132 . 5 PROGR SUPPLI � � . «.�� .. _, . ........ - _ 2 � .85_ 50 �6t; 51 14413 8 40400 08/'12 ST.P'AUL CITY OF RP'R & MAINT /E QUIP 112.50 52 >3 14414 840500 08/12/91 ST' .PAUL DISPATCH PIOIUE::E:.h PUC 30.00 -- �a L7 .�".! t • M E M f► .S k•/ S U fi � 29.38 59 . 'i 8 5s 14415 841600 08/ STAC MANUFACTURING UISTw SUPPLIES VEHICLE .61.96 i. !, + SUPPLIES VE= .M:EC:LE. _.. _ ....... �,4.�,�Cr - ._ _.. ,._..,..� _.._ ...___._,_,....__._. C.� - --- _ -.._.. ...__ _.. _ .. _ VOUCHREG • -• - C I TY OF . MAPLE�aCIOD PA PAGE 1 5 I I ,I ' . 5 ►;,/ tii/ 1 1::r .,� VOUC:HERI(:HE.CI: REGISTER FOR PERIOD i 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR C: H E: C V E N D b R . ..... .... . ... ......... T _......... _.._ ..._.. «_�.__.. «........._.._..._._._ I t _._. - ,_...._ .... ..._. ITE:t� .._ CHECN� � (� l�I.ER NUNAME NUMBER DATE A AMOUNT � } ;; R �, �• 4 6 S 41 �: 0 f1 08/12/91 ST AKES JEANNE K. �. _ _._. _. REFUND �'R%;iG_ FEES 13.00 ~13.00 s,. » 1"� OG n G 14417 4 �.�Ca CAS / 1 2/91 - - ST APLES � PA'UL I NE ' i I 1 � PROGRAMS MS .. r ; f' PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13- t SUPPLIES-OFFICE 6 73 .73 1441 54: 200 08 /12/9 1 STEFF=EM, SC07T � PROGRAM SUPPI.IES - � �++p��ryy� - ti. w V4f �'(•� • GO . i � 14419 843575 08/12/91 STREICHERS GUNS . ........ ...... .. SUPPLIES—EQUIP ' .... ... - ... � .r �. �; , f . >> 14420 843580 08/12/91 STRGAR ROSCOE- FAUSCH, I NC . OUT E NG I N FEES 421 421 . 32 t, ,a 144; 1 S'tC 0 1 SUPEfiA'1ER ICA SUPPLIEt1IP 99 .74 �._._ I; ;o FUEL O IL � �+� � 3 54 k�+.,.1 I;(j .. .... . ..... r• FUEL . C� I L 347. G. FUEL OIL 13 0 24 F UEL O 16.75. ;! �. FUEL ': OI � >r SUPPLIES—EQU Vin. 3:..51 Ally 27 . .. .... FUEL ° OIL 3`, FUEL OIL 29 FUEL :: OIL 108 - 86 4 �/ ��jj��• 2 9 198 .90 :3R fo �i 3 �! 144 S._ i ...�7,� JS / / i u w TP MW #,UPPLy I NC . SUPPL I ESQ �tFt -ICE '} 7 �2 SUPPLIES — OFFICE 27 o 13 ....... .. S UPP EE•- LI OFF �� .58 471.35 r' 13i 11 4! 35 144Z3 860080 08/12/91 T A. SiCHIFSKY SONS, INC MAINTENA MATERIAL Z9 168.1 5 I 4 5 1 ! M A I N T M E• R I A L 1 9 • � 1 5 • 8 7 3 9484.0 2 r1 R 17 ;R 14424 860100 08 T a J r AUTO .PAR SUPPLIES. VE►i I CLE - I !�1 1(1 SUPPLIES—VEHICLE Et 1 1095 202.76 I, 144:5 860105 0.,/1 "2/91 T. J r S HIRTS SH 116 ,� � r l 12 1� 4 860305 08/ ToJ »T. PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8.3 +24 - Sy r24 .,<,� 15 _...... ,..« .... .......... 144 .7 ..... ....... «...... ........... ....... -.._.......... 860315 �.................._........«.....«............:««...............,....._.................................:............«.. 08 12/9 1 T . K k D k A w .........,..................... .. -.,- ....,..........:...... .. .. .......... ............,... OUTSIDE E.NG IN FEES 9 fifi .......,.... .:..........., . -... ........ r OU ENG TN FE 1 OUTSIDE ENG IN FEES S 2, 76-:: a 94 5 , 375.60 �sz f;:3I 45 �. 8 1 TAR6ET STORES _ I..EGAL FISCAL 35 .07 fi 1 i y 1W, LEGAL F 29.56 «. ........:_....__ .__ .__: .. ......... ...... _..... .. O T H E R R C N •� U C • � .. � —� T• f E R �✓ � N a F � tJ i.r • 1 � � �r �.A � k (9 _ PROGRAM SUF-'NL IEL 2.49 3 PROGRAM S UPP L I E S �r1 4 3 l �� a • r.� 701 F , R �- _ PROGRAM SUPPLIES 54 ;,r . 5 PROGRAM :SUPPLIES 2 0.42 - -- -- - - -- - - -' 3 P ROG RA M SUPPLIES . 45 .96 . �ft� PROGR SUPPLI vouc*nEa 08/05/91 12x25 VOU CHECK VENDOR e - WE , K wumaEn wumosn oxrE 'CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 16 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER w FOR PERIOD 07 o ,'`,^ DESCRIPTION xnuum/ xMoumT o _ - _- 1_'16 .- PROGRAM pRomnxm auppLzEa ' '36'a� |� ° PROGRAM SUPPLIES _ - 573.60 14429 862665 08/12/91 THORSEN, NANCY REFUND-PROG REGIST FEES 18.00 18.00 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 35 00 46.95 TROPHIES UNLMTD 40.20 PROGRAM SUPPLIES ZZZ.40 PROGRAM SUPPI.IES 1444 CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES JANITJORIAL 1,17.50 SUPPLIES-JANITORIAL 86.95 204.45 14433 881090 08/12/91 TURNQUIST, INC. TURNQUIST 216.92 TURNQU IST INC:, 16Z.69 54Z 30 14434 881320 08/1Z/91 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT' AND - T W7.11 4 55 0 0 45.00 14435 881500 08/12/91 TW IN CITY FILTER SERVICE S U P P L I E S - E Q U I P .84.71 834.71 lu 14436 ..88Z800, 08/IZ/91. TW IN, CITY TRANSPORT FEES FOR SERVICE CONTRACT PYM. 14437 900100 08/12/91 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS CLOTHING 90.80 90.80 SUPPLIES zi 121 14439 911500 08/12/91 OKING INDUSTRIAL CENIER UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1958.28 198.20, Id 14441 931610 .08/12/91 WALZ SARA REFUND-PROG, REGIST FEES 13400 (JL I DA T ED WHEELER CONSOLIDATED 3 121.00 :14444, 94Z450, 08/11Z/91 WILSON ACCESSORIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6 Z_ 4 6 16Z,46 14447 960450 08/IZ/91 XEROX CORPORATION RPR MAINT/EQUIP 5 95 I VOUCHE EG i 08/05/91 12:25 C O F MAPLEWOOD ; ....... ....... REGISTER A G 17 FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ • -� CHECK r i VEht3 _ R C:HE:.Ct: � � r_ r 1=t VENDOR _...._:...._... �) h��1ER NUMBER DATE NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION ITEM CHECK .............. _ .. AMOUNT AMOUNT •I �.. RI GG 1 9 .35 , }I i _ ._........: .. R PR & MAIN T IE,QUIP _ , t` r �. i. i 4 rte 4I R 2 8.05 ;- _ - - _____ -_ - _ t 1444 98 0500 ZE A A T � '1600 TOT AL GHEE: K ;" li3 i 1 f 3 1 1 9 `.•t M f 9 1 -`i If` .I in 1 ,i . 15 Ali 1r , I 48 if 11 5?� .. ........ ........ ..._. _...... - f71 C wW, . w _........ ..:_...... ......_ .._. _ ............ _. e � j y I • • • • L",lTY OF M�`.PLEWDOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARN ING233 AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD PAYEE: 'UNT: LK NUMBER CHE,[.X,. DATED*:� H E" 2 3 41 0 2 42'C � 4 3 071", 1 9/ 9 1 JOSEPH ZZAPPA 2 E 61 CD022044 Cl 7 1 9./9 1 Df-ILLE CARLSON 269,sl7-1 7 f. 1 f 137, 1 121 8 2.2t_�i4 07/19/91 GEE; R'GSS-BA 04 269,3* o: 269v85 : 401 0022,-Z}61 lol 002J2046 0 7 1 9./9 1 GARY W__ -- B - PS T I A Ili 361 I i CO22059 1 f 137, 1 121 0022047 07/19/91 FRANCES L JUKER 269v85 : 401 0022,-Z}61 :41 , 1 1 , 15 0 OEa2 2066 0-7/19/91 MICHAEL A.: McGUIRE. 3, 084 1 5" .16 0' 07/ 19/91 GA' I L BL)PICKSTONE '37-01 17 18 0022050 UO3 r"fitZ MAG"L I CH 1 586. 20 .07/19/91* KATHRYN AW SMITH 1 S "' 67: 21 22 0 2' 2' f5 0 7.f' 1 1: 9 1 DAViD i J N 974,9 0 1 23 241 0'22.'U53 19/91 LY L E- SWANSON j C' D1 29 i25 26 -8054 _00.2.. LARRY J CUDE 30� 0 28 c C 2 2 "')5Z "N51- ANDREA J OSTER i 074, 10 29 30 0C.Q2056 07/19. WILLIAM MIKISKA s', 20 3 1 32 0 07/19/91 DANIEL P FAIMT 351 361 I i CO22059 1 f 137, !:481 i381:. 0 8 24 0 6 0 13 2 , 0 tb Q "'1 3' : 401 0022,-Z}61 :41 , 1 1 C") 0 2 2 �*"_ 3 S 22 t3i: 1 4 4 '00220631 ;461 ;.-)022 64 171 /91 THERESE CARLSON 1. DEPORAH DEHN 573,32 ALANA; K MATHEYS 1, 331., 77 07/19/91 CHRIS REGIS 07119/91 MARGARET GI BBB 362. 08 07.s." 19/91 DELORES A: v i GNAL G.' 1, 266. 25' 07/19/91 BRUCE ANDERSON 471 !:481 0 C-) 2 21,-) 6 5 07/ 19 91 LUCILLE E AUREL IUS 2 , 0 tb Q "'1 3' , 15 0 OEa2 2066 0-7/19/91 L OIS-BEH L :52! 0022 - 67 COt-4NIE L�KELSEY .531 0 LORRAINE S 'tip IETOR A I A f3i-s • 11 0022069 HENSL A. EY PATRIIC.IA 597w90 i 71 21 C. 2 2 0 7 9 ANTHONY G CAHANES 11 !241 0 C") 2 C 8 0 07/19/91 ROBERT D NELSON ,25 07 VERNON T STILL 1 480, 68 127 : 28 0 2 2)',- 8 2 DONALD W SKALMAN 16 5Q6.28 1 29 301 0022083 07/19/91 RAYMOND J MORE LLI #- 3 8 _ 17 19"1 -A ..S -NDR.4 OLSON 72 4 ai 9 C. 026.2084 07 113 SCOTT L STEFFEN 1, 101 C.) 2 2 0 7 3 07.se 1 9/91 MARY KAY PALANK - ------ 87' 1 7 3 34 0022085 Cl 7/ 19/91 DAV I D L AIRNOLD -V 2 00220)f 4 0 71 1 9 9 1 KENNETH V COLLINS 24291,54 3 t ; 5 21 4 D -'2075 Ne 07/1qv/91'' CAROLE L RICH-TE 1 001 14 6 00232-0 I s U% 07/19/91 JOANNE M S'-)ENDSEN I 277. as 7 8 0 0 . 22077 07/19/91 ELAINE FULLER 687,45 9 0:: - 002 07/19/91 CAROL. F MART I NSON 58 21 C. 2 2 0 7 9 ANTHONY G CAHANES 11 !241 0 C") 2 C 8 0 07/19/91 ROBERT D NELSON ,25 07 VERNON T STILL 1 480, 68 127 : 28 0 2 2)',- 8 2 DONALD W SKALMAN 16 5Q6.28 1 29 301 0022083 07/19/91 RAYMOND J MORE LLI #- 3 31 1 648, 0j+ 3 38.- 7 6 112 X) A -7 JOHN: C BOHL 07/19 * 3 2 C. 026.2084 07 113 SCOTT L STEFFEN 1, 33 I 0022088 7 19/91 DALE K CLAUSON I ' 5064 22 a X 431 34 0022085 Cl 7/ 19/91 DAV I D L AIRNOLD 35 361 0022086 07119/91 J 0 H N BA J N I CK 1 648, 0j+ 3 38.- 7 6 112 X) A -7 JOHN: C BOHL 07/19 * I 837a 14r 1 39 002 } 91 1401 I I 0022088 7 19/91 DALE K CLAUSON I ' 5064 22 a 1 421 0022089 43 44f t1-2 0 r 3 , 0 5 461 002 } 91 147 X 431 10022092 5 t ; 5 21 0022094 0►/ 1 I rl H $1 JOHN TCHISON. 07/19/91 JAMES YOUNGREN -�,w 5 3 2. 32fu 0 7 WILLIAM F PELTIER I j 730o59 9 07/1-9 THOMAS j C -Z C Z EPANSK I 07 1902 CABOT V WELCHLIN 1 57 9. 97 54 0 f,")2 2 3 9 5 07/19/91 R I CHARD J. LANG I j 733a 58 i ; 55 { 561 1 - 5 -9 E. A 002 2 096 D L $4 '07 ZSKAZOFF 10 48 5 7 RICHARD M MOESCHTER I s 506, 28 0 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ..0003 & r . ilz FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 9 241 -E C-.-.H NUMS w F CHE 0.- A. T Y SOW N , T 959,61 2 44 00 2117 w q JAMES M 3 0-%1;:- 10 a 07/19/91 JOHN' ASE 37 4 1 0022097 07/113/91 MICHAEL RYAN 1,;92.87 5 1 29 DUANE J WILLIAMS 61 0022098 OM 7/ 19/91 MICHAEL J HERBERT 1 720, 13 7 7 /7 1 380, 04 4 9 1 8 oq JM R 1, CHARD:* C.- DREGE.R.. 13 9 07/ 19/91. STEVEN PALMA 1 A 110 1022 100 131 GREGIO�RY L STAFNE l 34 OC122112 ROBERT E �v-'ORWERK 12 . 0022 1 0 1 07/ 19/91 RONALD D BECKER BOYER 1 3 d 4 :m o r 0022113 !14 dim � M 2 -2 1 C 1 498. a-3 V KEM m N R HALWEG 0 1649 1 5 C i-I R 0 L NEL SON 16 0022 103 071'' 19/ 131 DERRELL T STOCK TON 1 4 iB om 6 a ! 3 1 8 2 2 1 0 . 4 07/ 11 9/ 9 1 PAUL G PAULOS-JR. 5 56 9i 0141 1 5 /* 07/ R 10( A B 0 W M J4 , N _ I j 2 1 1 221 0022 106 07/ 19/9 1 FLI NT D KAR I s 1 523, 08 9 241 0022107 07/19/91 STEP�iEN J HEINZ 523, 08 959,61 2 5I :.: 44 00 2117 07/19/13 JAMES M 27 0-%1;:- 10 a 07/19/91 JOHN' ASE 37 28, 00221 �}9 07./19/91 DAVID M GRAF 1,7642,53 0 0 22 1 1 8 29 DUANE J WILLIAMS 4 i 7 3 3 4 81 PO i 002211 0 7 19/91 DAVID J THOMALLA. 7 /7 1 380, 04 4 9 1 1 539, 7" 3 2t 5 0 07/ 19/91. STEVEN PALMA 1 A 1 33 1 250 6 49k: 5 1 w 7 - 34 OC122112 ROBERT E �v-'ORWERK I t5'32w 45 il 135 SCOTT K BOYER 1 074. 10 40 j 0022113 7 1 9./9 1 JOSEPH A BERGERON 1 498. a-3 1 3 75 07 1 9 /91 C i-I R 0 L NEL SON 0022114 07419-/91 JAMES MEEHAN:, 70. j r 56 4 W ALDT: 3 401 0022115 07/ -- # 9.x1 *91 JON A MELANDER - 1 574 28' 0141 9 421 00221 7/ 19/91 SARAH SAUN DER S 959,61 X 44 00 2117 07/19/13 JAMES M EMBERTSON. 1 6 8 3,w 4 3 4 5 14 6 1 147 0 1 0 0 22 1 1 8 07/19/91 DUANE J WILLIAMS 4 i 7 3 3 4 81 0 0 2 2 1 19 07/ 1 9/ 9 1 JANET L RAB I NE 1 380, 04 4 9 1 5 0 07 JUL 1 A -STAH-NKE 1 250 6 49k: 5 1 w 7 - i 2 0022 1 1 7 9 /9 1 SCOTT K BOYER 1 074. 10 40 j 5 551 2 Z 0 1 2 2 - 07 1 9 /91 C i-I R 0 L NEL SON 5 6f 07/ 1 9 9. l w CYNTHI A W ALDT: 1 03 9 • CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0004 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHE-CK NUMBER�::��'�... od CHECK* DATE D P4 YE E., AMOUNT�� .132 07/19/91, MICHAEL R KANE' 1152a 50 0Q 22124 07/19/91 JOSEPH. FE*HR l 221, 50 00.22125 Q7/19/91 JILL PETERS I o6l, 48 2126. ... . . ..... 0, /19 /91 JAYME': L�:: -FLAUGfE. R'. -441 07-1. 128 I 0022136 07/19/91 JOHN SCHMOOCK 002212 07/19/91 JUDITH WEGWERTH 582a,96 0022128 1 204. 06: KENNETH G HAIDER 2291,54 1 RONALD J HELEY 1, 226, 90 0 07/ 19/91 JUDY M'?may HLEBECK.: 1 134 9;' 002213)-j 07/19/91 WILLIAM PRIEFER 1, l 4, 10 CK3222 131 07/ 19/91 GERALD W MEYER 1, 2 5. 26 .132 07/19/91, MICHAEL R KANE' 1152a 50 0 022 135 0022133 07/19/91 BRYAN NAGEL 07/ 19 91 401 24i 002 2 1 34 07/19/91 DAVID P LUTZ RANDAL LINDBLOM i 251- 4 1' 0 022 135 07/19/91 HENRY F KLAUSING I 07/ 19 91 27 1, 391 71 1 43:*.,: : **..*. 128 I 0022136 07/19/91 JOHN SCHMOOCK I 148- 50 '29 o' 02.2144 07/19/94*1 JOHN DU* CHA RME 1 204. 06: 4; 3ol 00 .. 2 . 2-1 37 RONALD J HELEY 1, 226, 90 0 07/ 19/91 E IC R K D OSWALD 1,: 1 50 DENN I S L P Al 0022146 i34ti 00 2 1 3% 07/1 RONALD L RE ERG 1 222 1 83 t3 5 1 50 136 [ 00221 4 £-} 0'7./1 91 WILLIAM C CASS 11 86L'w 9 3711: 0022141 07/ 19/91. TODD ZA0 432 00: WALTER M GEISSLER l 453o 93 531 401 �J' v 1- RANDAL LINDBLOM 4 1' 1421 0022143 07/ 19 91 JAMES G ELI.AS 1, 391 71 1 43:*.,: : **..*. o' 02.2144 07/19/94*1 JOHN DU* CHA RME 1 204. 06: 4; 46 47 0 �.-)22145 07 1 9fl 91 DENN I S L P Al 0022146 07/ 19/91 WILLIAM PRIEBE i49f 50 Le RUCE A. IR1SH... 11 86L'w 9 5 1521 0022148 07.8119/131 WALTER M GEISSLER l 453o 93 531 54 0022149 07/19/91 THERESA METZ 1 498m 639 5 5 1 50' 0-2 150. 07/ 19/9 JOHN R LOFG-REN 97 i 5 7 _004 1% 0 r t C I TY OF � #A��... E WOOD X3005 E#� #��. O V ' GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECK FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERI ` 1= CHECK NUM w 2 f 4 1 0 02 2 1 5 1 0 7/19/91 ROBERT D OD GA D 2 5 , Ll ?21 0022160 07/ 19/91 WILLIAM GARRY 1, 2 0022164 1 2 26 , 90 MARK A MARIJSKA 07 IX 4 C F .: 1ti1.M 111 ►T '. 0 1. / 9.1. - .'. ... M .!•:. '. `(`1`1y�.y�.yi ��'j{{.i� .. - .. - JY . . ..... Q 07 9 91 MARK CABLE 4 1 *5. 25 SC HINDELDEC 3 SO I 0022154 07/19/91 PAULINE STAPLES ly 812 5 11 ' 0022166 07 /19/91 DA' I D W I EDL 3 76.75 12 },30-221 071`x 19/91 LUT J O N ES 79a 20 13 ;_ 0221 X17 07 /1 9/91 MATTHEW I ML I NGER f � "'1 s 3 1 w l` z..f 1 37 00 2215& 07/19/91: KUNDE 0. 15 j s 1 249. 30 < ' 16 0022.115 7 07.11" 19 MICHAEL ill MARUS I CH 17 s , ") 0L'J.1► S 9 077 19/91 JOEL M L. t"f l► � 18 00221 221 07 1 9/91 ROBERT S ANDERSO N 1 1 82. 10 X421 0022 170 07./19/91 " LEE STOERZINGER , 3., 7 20 00 2e 159 +� 1821w 10 f i _ 21 v oti ?21 0022160 07/ 19/91 WILLIAM GARRY 1, 2 30 0022164 1 2 26 , 90 MARK A MARIJSKA 07 DAB# I EL BURKHART -� - 00221 07 9 91 MARK CABLE 4 1 *5. 25 30 0022164 07 1 9/9 1 MARK A MARIJSKA 697, 34 311 - SC HINDELDEC 3 SO X33 34 ' 0022166 07 /19/91 DA' I D W I EDL 3 76.75 .35 ,36 � ;_ 0221 X17 07 /1 9/91 MATTHEW I ML I NGER f � "'1 s 3 1 w l` z..f 1 37 .... s 1 249. 30 < ' : 40; s , ") 0L'J.1► S 9 077 19/91 JOEL M L. t"f l► � 41 +. w L X421 0022 170 07./19/91 " LEE STOERZINGER , 3., 7 1431 f i _ 21 v oti 145 . 0022 07 .8 91 TODD JAGGE 40 1 & 63 A7 43 0 f7 19/ 9 CRA IG M I 401 0-3 49 5d ..: 6 .. L i L `C N 51� L 152( 0022 07 /19/91 LOAN HE L E POL LEI 24 1531 54 022 07119/91 KIR AURELIUS 1 t o w 0 022 1 7 7 f i r i .f` 1 .: aa r�k ,{�, t'"k .. f"f�„� . `mot' 8 �.5 - ,t iSJ� r l CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5C) EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNIP46S AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECAS FOR THE CURRENT P AY PERIOD E UIM � s 1.. CHECK DTI' AMOU 4T 2 r; 3 4 0022178 KIM BERTHIAUME 26',-.), 00 5 s 0022 07/19/91 MICHELLE HI LSGEN 2 # 8w 7 7 9` _ .: 1 0100 22 1 al 07/19/91 HER RAC,. MILLER 3594 00 *I ll 0022 12 00 2 2 182 07" V / 19/91 SHANNON MI 1 3 m 7 5 CINDY BACKLUND: 1 • 0.022,201. 0022193 } 183 07/19/9:1 KAR-T. DREGER 2 0 15 ( 52 1 0 Q 2 2 0 2 07/ / 1 / 1 GERA D I EBEL �. �� 88 {53 "5 4` i7 07 /19/91 CA RY RAHN � � � M �► 0022 ; e 5r{ 120 ..> 0022— 1' 6 1' «i �' # �$ 3' O .. LEK: i r i 21.:,; 22 ... �. 0221 �. }�'�' 19/91 JENP41 ER #.. DKE ��.�. �� 23 24 1 i 0022188 07 19.," 91 MICHAEL GRAF 2350, 35 25� __- !2si :. t. , 2 1 07 �� / 9 � DENS �# tB �. 152,50 I i il 203,44 0022 '. 7 .rs' 19/ 9 BERET L A RSON 195 00 1 2 07/19/91 CINDY BACKLUND: • 0.022,201. 0022193 07/19/91 JENNI FER MC MANN s ""122-1 TODD*HERBER, -951w 56 21 196 07/1 91 JOLAINE OLSON 1'71.25 } 4 81 CX322200 07/19/91 JENNIFER HUNT 155,t 00 t� t 9J • 0.022,201. { _#"... ( 52 1 0 Q 2 2 0 2 07/ / 1 / 1 GERA D I EBEL �. �� 88 {53 "5 4` 0 07 /19/91 CA RY RAHN � � � M �► 0022 ; e 5r{ 1) 0 0 C OF M PL E WOOD 0007 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD NU MBER: CHECK DATEDI. { » };'. +' .' ��' AM 1 1 367.94 +31 � _ _. .... _ : THOMAS R IEDESEL 4 0 02220 07/ 1 9/91 ROB' G WARS? 4 22 , 40 5. THOMAS G EKSTRAND 61 C)0222',-)6 07/19/91 DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN 1 7 •:: 1 36 1 0 02 222 1 1 07/19/91 MAR O R I E OST ROB � � �. �►y,.� 9� ;3811 OcJ' -2222 0 NICHOLAS N CARVER. lol 0022208 07./l 9/ 91 JEAN NELSON — i 492.35 Lml (12, . } ?.. } ?..� t �' fir'' JUDITH A HORS ELL 592,2-15 � 14 .; ftiX 22 1 ��: ' 1 : . HUTCH NSOP .. ..... 11 0.3 , 11 00222 1 1 07/ 19/91 R I T A # ACY 172, 1181 0'.3 22212 1 19 E20 21 221 0 022214 40 , 23 I 241 00222 1 5 LYNE FISHER 07/.19/ KATHLEEN M DOHERTY', 0 MARIE BARTA 07/19/91 GEOFFREY W OLSON 07/1,9/91 NANCY; M ISKELL . 127 E 222 2 9 . 6 ,- 1, 074. 1 1 062. 4 7 586 1 3 ol 00222 { » };'. +' .' ��' KENNETH ROBERT 1 1 367.94 +31 � _ .07/. /. 19 94 THOMAS R IEDESEL .o , 331 THOMAS G EKSTRAND 1 542. 95 1351 1 36 1 0 02 222 1 1 07/19/91 MAR O R I E OST ROB � � �. �►y,.� ;3811 OcJ' -2222 0 NICHOLAS N CARVER. 1' 3 5473 10 1 t 3�1 0022223 07/19/91 ROBERT J WENGER 1,341,30 i 41' : 42 1 07/19/91 EDWARD A NADEAU 1 7 393 SO 1 jj 30. .......... .225* 1 46' 002 2226 07j?' 0' 91 LA't) RNE S NUTS SO3' _ 11 647.7 5 471 t :481 002 0 7/19/91 OGE R W BREHE I M 1, 2 7 0 1 C (� k .. .. �.�� w�.►.1.::. � 40 E 50 ..._ -. .. - 07/ ..:: . .' :�..� - ;�''/C �r E #1 + C_. _ fit' - . - �.a.E�! t _ - i�a - - 51. s .321 0022229 DAVID GERMAIN I - 225a 31 153 54 0 2 2 2 0 ER IC # B 14SON DOE j : 343w 7 a . � 61 I E I L.- .: - - :. f ;'�'.'_ � . . ,_ . . . .. I . .: itA `,�* � ..:_.... ' ' . ... 1. . , � , NT p 2 .., k :�! .. ...... � I . .... '.. .': -. - - .. .;.... :.. , ... . I ... ,.. .:. _, ..... ...: - .. .. 1. *': ., . . � I � � _ ., ,. I . . ... - . ' "' . . , _ _ _.. _ . .. :.�. : .- . : -� _ � . .'. ".. .1.1 .. :: i..;;... 11 .. I 11 . ��. _'� .. FF 3 € :::: :. .... :- .:.... . . . .... ..... ,,.,.,. .... . ..- .. .. .. _ _ .. . .. . , , ..:: . ..,. .;.... .: :. ... -:.- .. ..._.. . 4 I _.._ };,.��'�' t x''91 _ .': _ - , ::. ____ GEORGE C S�_RE I L - .---.-. � _... . 1 , 5 . 1 1 6 i1 i� + � �? '"' . ... . _ '� � .+� � � �`' � .. ...,. :....: .,:._...... � �... � i � � � � ..� �+'�► � �.�. + ! r -4 8 . :> ;... .. :. .. . , . ' is :.: l.... I ' ' _. . . %;;;= 2,44, 1. .. � . �. ..... �- . * * ' '' ** *1 ' .: Vo T I . ... . . ». � . I : 9 :... .... . MAPLEW000�:. . s A . ... . . . . I . 9 :TE::: -'AW ' :: # I : , �*�' } _.. 1 .25 .--'-;�:�� .:. =%5. 1,96 7 R i 9,.. . .. ... . I. ... .. . . I ... . . 101 0f, 2223 s VUl U 07/ # 9/91 ., .. ..,- . >. . ... . , -.. . #'t� ��'�#�' ��#� #�# O ��'�'��..� , .. ,..: . 91 9 279. 0 1 4 11 12 #:y022236 VOID 9 +, 3 f . -. . . 40 j �: . �. . . . . . . -T ASSOC . . . '. `796 96'� �- "': 15 .::: . _. . . . .. :.: _. . . 9. . . .1 . 9 1 . - I X..: 4 0' 161 17 _ _ 002 � 2238 --o 11 . 18 � 022 VOID 07.s� i g�''9 _ � 'A ;� 18« 75 . ... ... 9 . . .. . . . . . . .. 40 } f i .. .. � . _ . . VOI D 9 . . . 91. : . 9 1 . . I . CITY OF MAPLEWOOD. (HIICMA) 1. ''. 3. 548 a: 42 .::.::.,': 2, > : - 22 0022241 -00" _ % 07/19/91 _ _ . .. & M . . _ 26 00 _,......... 4 23 a . 2 4 ;.... . #_��_�L�L»L�'�1►... ........ .. _ .. .. . VOID 0r t / 19 �� +�� '�} #��`� 0� ��"« �`�'��..#�... 1 3« 9 6 X25` _ " .. .. . _ 1 27 "::. � 2fi { .}� .. ' . . .. . VOID M �s�R..r`: iyl� sal !'!W{.�iar'f _ . 'r" _ _.. . . . .. .. 9. . ZS #..� } L }..•.1►.. }�»'�'�'s'� . VOID , .f f`r .. _. _ . .99 . � I PU . 7" i ; M 7 77V.� d► 7 ti y J } t T 7 W 1 oc s . I I k.r / 50 29 . 30 ` ��..�i i►:�'y=�..� " '� ��.� r 19/91 �� : � .a �� .�. ��I EM ' 5 r a �? _... ... f3, . _ _ . _ . 11 _ .. t t ::. .. ,:..: _ _ . ` .: . '' . I 1 9 , I .. _ 9 1 - 07 /I 9:/ 1 � .:: , . .: : .. . . . . . I AFSCME 2'725' . 9 . . � � . . ..".. 587. 9 ... 33 . . . ..... 34. .... .1. ._. _ » ,� ,� � � 2 2247 » _ l _ ... .. . 0 ,' .+' 19.' 9 # _ . .:_ . ... MN BED_ '" r + } 5 >>. .::: 0 E35 . 3fif I :.: ' ..� ;�.} .., _ . . k.� ,' . +` �' f'�i `• . 3� ....� ' =l3 . l "398 1 E; » }. �» 0 37 . - . I 38 . .: ... ..,., �... }►....' . : .. . VOID . . .. �. l I . EMS_ R . I ENT 0 4 a l � ... 39E .. . .. _ _ : _ . . I j 4oj C � C � 2 %'-:.I" 2 ! 5 C-) .... . . OC I a. CIO !� "41 f . 1 421 f � }�}i� 5 ► VOID {,.} a'��`' . .. .. t •{ ry-+ . } 0 47 .� , , 82 fQ3 . .. .. _ - . . * 1 i �....::';::.. fo: I I . 0 * � ) ss . . 1 9 07/.1-9/91 -. �. ...... RAMSEY CO: S.U.PPO.RT i 3 , 8 1 � : _1 -':_� 4 6 �.f0222 53 VOID 07/ E �`L O'eEE BEN PLANS 91. .... �� >..�� 0 . i 1 r 1:: 143 ;: }022254 VOID 0 ., � 9./99 '' _ . ' � }_�. X49£ ... : . _.. : . . .. f .. . _ , 0 - _ :__ � VOID .. .. _ .».- -. _ _ . . . __ EA . . ,,' - . : m . :�-ll �. 5 ,_ 1 :..; .: I I- . .. .> - . .; . . . ... .. .. _ - _. .. _ 521 . >,��0222 6 . VOID . o l' �' 1 9.' 91 . .. . IRS ; I �•�NESOTA (FICA) . . 91,609,119 l 1 4v iJ ?54 3 � }�. 2 225 VOID 07 .' # g1' 9# � ;� �... � � ��; ��' � � ��#�#�" � S 0C 5 0 5 }. , ,^ !Z)5' ' _. I �'. �M . -:. *, ..': . I b I � 1 9 I I.. I.. I . . '04: . . 9 . . . : � . 9 - - EMP. --:.PET I REMENT Assoc:��::�. � I..., . . ,. 4 o 2 I .." . � IH . � . . � . . . 1. lip CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTIO I N CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD I i I 231 - I 26 1271 � 1291 30� 49 150 51 7 - 4W 31 33 :34► 1351 361 3 7. 39 440 141 i i421 ;4T. 1 4 !46' 471 t 48 1 1- 49 150 51 lb �► 31 54, 779 .. . ....... 1 3 6 X 5 a lb xaraw. MLr+ wxca4<,- a srK2 m:+ s�mzz�sv+t u�: 3 v�xxaw 3 + asgDjr. �acA.• s; �xv^. �v?: w�CSA• c. w�rbruceruaaa�yrraaxa�r.. C:. wra 'Gxvarr.�r^aa:G:�cr�':L;x�:eT.� *z'�'x _r.. :..:;�; G..6. a.r,.•,.r�1��r:..r,;µaz;.ri�w ; .rarr::Wpi::vrs�wwe:.car•.,�p,; s�u::uiLUarrl�:dY � >=:• - a, 4a9c�sSt�. fB�s6Y3cds�- YgaafsxYR�YmykCLe++�xiEmsN�p: 6 ` - iee.' I 7 Y OF ? - J � ♦ P L i...a 1• - } O.iM' (� �• F OR 'HE C NT PtfY PE R IOD c� F lu pp s *. '' i �i 4 3 ...: t }�.j•:.r:.».�k...�� ,�- }' :.�,� i .� � �• ��. f � t ..:: ' 6. 5 DALE CARLS'0114 t. i �w. 67 0i. 8 ': �w f. 1 1 F : 1 - w A� S 1 AN X11! 12 *. 0ice 2 2� ' ? o.� 1 ? a. 1 ..r• FRANCE L J U K E R 269. 2k 5 14 a 9 f-D%8 02 9. 1 Kl"CHAEL. A McGUIRE 3. 74: f _ 06 tli `,*7 2 2 2'j 3. .7 C 2 w. _ y t 17 18 )0.2221 RE T"HEN MAG L I CH 7`* �.r v7 KAl`HRYN.. A I TH 2 11 22� fff ? tied w i ,2 2 2 i.... �' 3 3: 1 } ^i 2 ,w wJ A.) 1 / f i.f i .b .s ? iM�7� }• »• i it L i23 • 0 0 2 2 &.20 77 4 108/ 02J.11 91 L Y L $E co-'31WANSON 036if 48 25� _ 26 � t� i.: 27 t..: 128 �. ;» �... ,' C 4 - . C Ii.e. l AN • � � E ,.. tie.:• S E I � s;� j 1 1 � ! 29 w ... t301 C 2=,- 2 7 1 r • 31; , 32 3 � F AN EL. I FAUST : .. r» «� 33t i Ax i.w 1 two 1 CAR f '• '�'� F.' • �35 1 1 � �,�0 222 �►0 .�3.8 >;. >2 91 D � } RAH �i: -��•# 4 2.3 '�.} _ �� 1 38r 7a K. MAT114EYS :2,w 50, ! t 1,39.. l46. 7 a...... i► i.... ��.j ti J i. #.. • + ... L..• 1` s i R i x414 0 0 2 2 28- k... I.w 1... 3 DELORES A I GNALD w? l� 4l .. _ 44, ! .:: OX- 2 8 4 BRUCE At -4DERSON: ( 45 t 14 6 1 {_g» ti.. �......_..,.� ... - �... i S 47 222 3 6 08/1*1)2/91 LOIS PEHM t5�t.. ». ..l ..f E�:: z w✓L r �+.ee... 1 ;5' t .. 52 ti. i.'�7:.� l►... I► « SI } a. f J ti. � } » l .� R *Pl N � � V A 0 .22289 �.. 1 3 w� i 1 � .A J { i • T R � � � � !� i �' E 3 •� � � L Few �� 1wr wf 7, w/ } �w� - _t — _ -0222`30 858 1 0 . 6 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD � 3 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS* FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD I 2 2 29 5 8/0 2 9 1 CH"ROLE L RICHIE se 121 13 . JDANNE M:. SVE.t �SEN. -Ja:7 02 1 2 15 ILAJ i u 2 2 Z'21T 7 -1 7i Li - 4 1" or 16� 4 IF u L L I= 11 118 2 me t�L*K - VR. t ip 6 ... .... ;31 3 1.302 2.305 180 p DAV I D:. L. ARNOLD 20[ 0 4 JC 32 2- 2 .3 1 Lh :5i .8 0. T I 221 2 3 9 1 .11 OW4 P" *ft 0- P14 W", so— OW4 p" - N W 1:3 tz rol I v N t__ L.;D IJ r1l 13- 61 1 C) 9 !=t SANDRA OLSON 799. 84 1 7 02)f -91 JOHN C 40141L E- 1 -80-94 8 0. 04 MA 85 Ar 9 DALE' vi CLAUSON 5f, 40 110 cl ILI kz: 08 1 . 0 . 7 11 p K E NINL V UULL 1 :7* —41. I 2 2 29 5 8/0 2 9 1 CH"ROLE L RICHIE se 121 13 . JDANNE M:. SVE.t �SEN. -Ja:7 02 1 2 15 ILAJ i u 2 2 Z'21T 7 -1 7i Li - 4 1" or 16� 4 IF u L L I= 11 118 7 7 00221298 0 8 J* 0 2./* 9 1 CAROL F MA"RTANSON l 227, 58 1, 871. ♦6 ;31 1.302 2.305 180 p DAV I D:. L. ARNOLD 20[ 0 il�.NTHONY* G CAHANES� l 1:3::... 21 1 34 1 .8 0. T I 221 2 3 9 1 .11 OW4 P" *ft 0- P14 W", so— OW4 p" - N W 1:3 tz rol I v N t__ L.;D IJ r1l 13- 0 123 2 4 1 00222301 08/02/91 ',)ERNON T STILL 25j* 08102.0 !26 DrONALD. �i SKALMAN 2 1; .. i2d, V111-4=1 all r-1784f 72?11 1 R A. M ON 13 E L L i 1 29 tB8 1 ,. 904. 40 ' 30 7 7 00,22304 08,/* 02/* 9 1 SCOTT L STEFFEN 1, 871. ♦6 ;31 1.302 2.305 180 p DAV I D:. L. ARNOLD 7 7.77. 1 34 1 .8 0. T I i BAN 1 CK b6 7.- 5.3 j 08/ 1 1 02)f -91 JOHN C 40141L E- 1 -80-94 r3 DALE' vi CLAUSON 5f, 40 -01%374�0t" -`S! rzrl I =WDS. 28' All i 421 0 22310' 08.'t "A 9 1 IN JOH H AT 14 I SON � 3N ..� '44[: -C I 102 -S�:"(DUNGREN: JAM" 145t' 46 i 471 1: )1= L r 1 E FZ 8 A81 2 2 _33 13 13 8./ 0i 2 9 1 THOM)QS J SZCZEPANSKI I., 540m 57 501" .22 32Z 1 CAB OT V WEL0HL I N 15 125 w 52 2 3 R.7 rl i A R D' I LAN'S it 1531 i I i. �54i 0 0 2 2 231 0 a DALE RAZSKAZOFF 1, 56� 1, .4 S 56 0082317 M I CHAE-L 1% .p R CPfEC-K VA I ED- PR. Y E E R M, 0 UN T 2 3 0 M. Cf-trF51: i HERS a 93 , al C 42-1.1 1 ERT 41 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 04, EMPL.OrEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUC*TION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD i 23 '24 125". 08 /02/9 1 ;27i JOHN FRASER I, .21323, DAV I D M GR�A-F- ;s;s 40 1291 2 n 1, s,- � 3 2 2 3 1 08-.,,'02/91 STEVEN PALMA 31 : 1341 ' 351 08/02/91 ROBERT. E VORWERK I,y 830, 20 54 I IS61 I 3 61 51 -�2., 08 '9 1 --S MEEHAN J A ME 1 -{lsl 1 3 1 3 7 £ 1 C-) C"} 2 2 3 19 08/ 0 2-j 91 R I CHARD C DREGER as 1 574 1 61 j 401 7 s A Mr? t4 8 C2320 -8-1021*91'-::� 0 GREGORY L STAFNE jo 42 4 3 3 a Ole: 02: 9 1. 1 v) C 272, 3 -* 1191 R0 I.AL D D DEC! -KER 4C i 461 0 c n-4.2 -2-1 3 13 c; 8.0 10 0 10.2 91 -4ET L 1 r--lS usxi J 1 7 1� 1 2 C"�iD22322 il", 8 0 2./9 1 KEV I N R HALWEG LR 727,v 1%-J7 13 I k.�93. 7/2 1491 150i 108 02 / 9 1 SC OT T K BOYER 14 . rF 2323 •w .� €,. �..... . DER BELL T STOCK TON 15 22 3 42. 'C. Pill, 0 L 1 17, 94 1 6 A 54!; all 002 34 -4 7 CY NTH I A WALDT 1 7 5 6' 1 81 08,/ 02 9 1 0S." 2/9LI R ICK A BOWMAN 1 44 5 5. 8 19 1;.- 1: R. 33 2 i 6 � 08 0 9 1 F N D T L I KAR I S i 523 , 0 8 ; 201 ; 2 1 1 2 -XI -11: 3 25""' ini 1 -02 "l '41 STEPHEN I-- rl*?;s i 23 '24 125". 08 /02/9 1 ;27i JOHN FRASER I, .21323, DAV I D M GR�A-F- ;s;s 40 1291 2 n 1, s,- � 3 2 2 3 1 08-.,,'02/91 STEVEN PALMA 31 : 1341 ' 351 08/02/91 ROBERT. E VORWERK I,y 830, 20 54 I IS61 I 3 61 - 111% %. 2 3 :3 4 -�2., 08 '9 1 --S MEEHAN J A ME 1 -{lsl 1 3 1 3 7 £ 40 `38i 03/02 /13 1 JON $4 'IELANDER 1 574 '39t j 401 s A Mr? t4 1 C}022337 I JAMES M EMBERTSON 1 66 3 w 4 3 42 4 3 3 a Ole: 02: 9 1. DUA?l j WILL JAJ�JS 477'. 34. ' i 461 0 c n-4.2 -2-1 3 13 c; 8.0 10 0 10.2 91 -4ET L 1 r--lS usxi J 1 7 1� i 1 4 8; 0 C 2 2 %*.;-3 A 0 I k . 0 8 2./9 1 JULIE A Sl-AHNKE I k.�93. 7/2 1491 150i 108 02 / 9 1 SC OT T K BOYER 1 3. 7 2 i5l 52 22 3 42. 'C. Pill, 0 L 1 17, 94 54!; all 002 34 08/02 'S I CY NTH I A WALDT 942, 1 5 6' 4.;�-4 4 08,/ 02 9 1 JOSEPH: FEHR 33 7 6 4 4 40i t4li 7 00223t':-�4 91 JAMES G ELIAS 142� I 2•16. 9J."I asso ot. Sm 23 1,, 391, 7,-) 41 44 102 12 3 a 5 .2 00 0 1 JOHN* DU CH"RME: 30 1 45 1 � RONALD J HELEY C I TY OF MAPI E1400D 0 .022:359 146 �: Efq1cK:- D OSWALD. EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDLJCTIGN CHECKS -PECR 11 411 i. 3T 1 !471 F T HIE C""URRENT PAY P�E- R 1 08-7 RON'Ptn t F P, E r= R I I I 48 135i N. W ILL L I f-l' M P RI E 1-:(E �CH.ECK INUMBEK: 7 C CK— I VR LID 2 A-: -23 61 14M, 4T 2' ;38 TODD ZACK. 3 -2.3 .51 4 C-1 s -1 11 1622.7 , 3 1 j!LIL PE-T Ep's V) A t T E R M, 0 r- SSLER -- ------ 5' .54 2 2 3 7 0 0 2." 2 3 4 6 08 JAYME L FLAUGHER 1, 7 8 4 MATKA, 1: T-1: 9 Is .-�-R.. LOFGREW 1', oce. 44. 1 25 4 8- 08. o P '31 jUD I TH WE G WE Ps TH' . 6 4' 40 121 CK 22349 IV,0141NE"17H Z-1 291, 54 13 os 22350: 08/02/91 JUD. Y N1 ,p .s , .16 L I Al M ER 40 " 17 + -Q 2 3 191 4 0 i 20[ AQE' .m I cl R 4NE 1 so: 221 i23' En R A N 1* 11 41 AEr- �� ST �_"7 R 0 !24 2 3 X-2 , 5 5 i-'�a 10;2/91 DA'-) I D P L U 17 Z 225. INS :25t'' 56 08 421 HENRY F KLAUS I ?4G. 2522, .26 27 281 jolziil SCHMocca"Its 4 4 40i t4li 7 00223t':-�4 91 JAMES G ELIAS 142� I 2•16. 9J."I asso ot. Sm 23 1,, 391, 7,-) 41 44 102 12 3 a 5 .2 00 0 1 JOHN* DU CH"RME: 30 1 45 1 � RONALD J HELEY ; 32 0 .022:359 146 �: Efq1cK:- D OSWALD. 1 33- -PECR 11 411 i. 3T 1 !471 34' 3- SO 08-7 RON'Ptn t F P, E r= R I I I 48 135i N. W ILL L I f-l' M P RI E 1-:(E 136 2 A-: -23 61 08/02/91 WILLIAM C CASS ;38 TODD ZACK. 4 4 40i t4li 7 00223t':-�4 91 JAMES G ELIAS 142� I 2•16. 9J."I asso ot. Sm 23 1,, 391, 7,-) 41 44 102 12 3 a 5 .2 00 0 1 JOHN* DU CH"RME: 14112 44. 1 45 1 � 146 �: -PECR 11 411 i. 3T 1 !471 I I 48 A.- 0022 3t:) N. W ILL L I f-l' M P RI E 1-:(E i49i ;ruslr 2/91 IRISH� 1 62. 9k .51 52 V) A t T E R M, 0 r- SSLER -- ------ i53 1 .54 2 2 3 7 0 THERESA META 55" a 024 .-�-R.. LOFGREW 1', oce. 44. - - ------ ------ 1 CIT'r OF MAPLEWOOD 0005 EM ;: lEE GR 236S EA RN INGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION H CKS FOR THE URRE T PAY PERIOD • :. 1 } l... 2 .. /.: 3; 5� 7 �:: 8 7r«.J►...s. �:.. 5.:.ir..t l .5:P'"f:!"�< x`s.f _ t 1 9 � _ 1 V ) M "MI =2137 M 2 13 f 5 O N 3- 10 I l i I • L at ! Sl H M-S 1 12 00i`3237 08. , " 02 ,/91 LUTHER JONES 7 20 ' s �," .. 'j 7� «� .w�► # w •w 'i•.i j j } ,t - �.r ✓' � of .. .. y� � � - { y �w _ �.{� } M i" 7�' bJ C � E.T. i.�i ND1V► J�, .[.rrr+aai�� [ � b1.�. 1�[.�` R' ��S 1.[i' .: . 1151 17� 19� - 50 08 021 9 1 21�.; 4► X23 fc4 2 3 8 2 08/02.11 _ ROLAND B HELY 1, 22t5, 9() 1 { ,2J , 27f I 1301 .1 61 2a 92 1, 14ues 50. , K _ �33i ; - - :34i r X 1 35 1 00 ;, I 0 /9 1 MAT T HE K I ML I N R 96 R C)o 1 ' 0 -121 -1:2: 3 8 9 08 02 9 1 MYLES R BURKE I A _ ln� , X39 I 1 ! 40 ti. �... ... {... ... 0 08. Vi-2 I' w. Q. 0 A••• 22 1 57 R 1•.. 1 41 1 ;421 002 2 1 08. /02J' 91 LEE STOER/ I f`4GER 396. 00 00 212392 083/02/91 ?[... R k.w 5 41.:, �6 ' X47 i A81 _ 2 4 9 1 +j' "V MM' - �� I `• i1 f .f TERRY IY �M► f .. o " .: .. . �f' +N f : X 50} :51 ,�... �... :...• ... 521 f nLL L O)N _LSPOLOLE.1 '53 54i .. •,. k... s.... _ ' y ��' :- "i.• 1[•w •w• ti..• iw' .R �'ie. •.•...f� ��1 •} }� C i - 4• .A i j f S.` .i Ir 25 • V ' 1 C I T •r' OF MAPLEWOOD i EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD { 2 3 1 8 s »' }ti.�' 'a' ,} .; e' . ��' } ..t : SHERRAL . _ . . . i •` `+ �•.' tie �..� ? ti• 1� O �L r � .t t � �w J i...• 7 a 1 T f�� { -"` - - .. � � � � J .Irk I 11; _ =14 . '' 1 S ; •�+ s.». k... +..f 17 _ « ., ? . 1... J' "f :L '" 1 8 ! r w }.• } ��. } �'�•'-•'' } .» w }�►.t�0 t' 91 �'�T '�'�.. EN PETER k I p •YI 00 4 l� } } + � }�` �•� 4.._. - i' �... f.w �y ,2 `�;. i }_ ?� � t c •.f Ws' d r 2 •r 1 d yR }Z. i+ sp } ]}.; ]j!�� t ' I '' �w w T T L E "4 Lr ��+/ t.� t `'.�►"�.. a "'Z =22� «. k..• ♦i j 231 24` »�'- 24 " � >; } _`" {{ M 1 AEL GRAC" � � � ?_� �E9K 2 . =28 � »'L... - T iw..� t 1•r! J UT _...,p•�._,.__ w ,ti•.•• ..+ 1.•r 1 i.••L L 129 C 22-4 1 2 40 3 21 , 0'02.24.1 � �; �.�� #�� # � �� `�� 21 0.00 !34i iro { z_ }�.� .1: ��} : �.� }. ; -.� J +4.Y J .1 TODD H ERDE R S 0022416 3. ;Dis _ 3 9" y �+» } }» �.:. �' �� pit }..} �' .:3 a_'_F RAG:. '�E TS !�'s�'[. B a A �i � "} 1a• k. '4)2 **'g 1 � I •° $�f0 i 45 E . '4 47 .» R _ 5 212422* 048- 'D2 - 2326 'St -- r ». 002242j+ D8 02 9 1 ROY G WARD 422,v4 40 t '-j 2425 08/ 02/91 D OUGLAS .. f !" i 1. 4a7 70 �7' '� V CITY OF MAPLEWOOD E MPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 1 f,- 0007 1 42 OC J2 2 -4 4 5 08/ 02./9 1 AMD 2, _ 3 - f DA � G I ` ` f : E 51 6 1 0 }, •. }22427 0 .8/02/91 J U D I TH H A HORSNELL 592 7 4 28 t .,.: , 08/ �! '}'q,f� ,1 101 i " 11 00-22,44g.' 361 12 0 } 2 24 30 08/ / LY NE F I SHER 47-4 13f f37 �. : 1 0. L» J .1:. r q , '" w WE! L 2 6 ar i...� 3 , �� 13SS :_.: }i i. } '1►�..'�... (- • MW': 08/02 16! ,•• i«. b.. 't'} s»� L... �. %l :.. ;' S. L... i N. li • #•• y i gl ib, a...; X171 { 00 22433 ?_ }sa }2 a'' 91 GEOFF REY W � L1'-3 N �7 }:: x,: "824 3 t i `' `- `, K L 120� :; . 8,. �22 _ .�` i •« s.w r .f. L. 8 ` t ' t;,.c 1 a n . 36 23 .24 0 0224 .36 } r f-} 2 r rw V100 T H R O BE RT S l y 2 32 , 4 7 25 - ,. 26f.. . X0224 - < , , > 1 ; E � '' ` i '`' . ,, . } - 57 11 I IZS L k.» ' CD 1 fw. 7 69's, V M.� ! O ! 1 42 OC J2 2 -4 4 5 08/ 02./9 1 DAV I D B EDSON 1 ,.'.: L..► _ 31[ - f DA � G I ` ` .. E F 461 08.0-4 1 ERIC MAR N 130 I ,1 i 35 c! 00-22,44g.' 361 N �.._ } +. } 9�... �.' �.� 4 :... �..} � �,. } 7►... � � ' G C G E W _ M W E �, 225 3f } l , S. f37 . �.. �... 7►... '_'} +..� ti. �. : 1 0. L» J .1:. r q , '" w WE! L 2 6 ar i...� 3 1 531 , �� 13SS :_.: }i i. } '1►�..'�... (- • MW': 08/02 VE R E - . S '.: ` E MY 00224 VOID ,"'mot - ,f C)2 91 f SAP LEWOOD STATE BANK #1 22 56 . ' �.. �... �} �,., C O I D ,. x... M `ATE : COMM.. .VENUE 1 42 OC J2 2 -4 4 5 08/ 02./9 1 DAV I D B EDSON 1 ,.'.: L..► _ f DA � G I ` ` : r►:�+... #. . F 461 08.0-4 1 ERIC MAR N 130 I ,1 00-22,44g.' ��•'s� r ..► 1.� � �...�,� 70 .:::. f 5 ,;. 1 _ 152 . �.. �... 7►... '_'} +..� ti. �. : 1 0. L» J .1:. r q , '" w WE! L 2 6 ar i...� 3 1 531 i �- ! 00224 VOID ,"'mot - ,f C)2 91 f SAP LEWOOD STATE BANK #1 22 56 . ' �.. �... �} �,., C O I D ,. x... M `ATE : COMM.. .VENUE - s�+ urz. .pc�SL.vFCHS.rsa�.'sn*sakF�me�i a�r AVM' i: u �:/: satid r• , •• , ^ „- . , ^ , 1:.4'*i•;in�+ , "ce.0 +`+isss yix:KaSiawea. 9ut�5�fS'�raa...az . - �tp�CG'S'dU` CUY.:` uDf'a'iV[agCJ�'L ^f1SN9�1+2�y�SPFgL' 9's!d:Y�'HY= > .�+L" v - -'2.� • ••• . •f9.KS a. MPL OYEE GROSS EARNINGS ND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY P ERIOD e _ �y . �2' . 4. 3 tto 4 1 •» « z» � i w �' ;» a` F S IE 3 H J fig'. 61 __ j « '..l '.l /1 y «�. e }« '..f i 9 1 ;- -'LIP f i A SS OC 1"ti i r• 2 98 E f $ .« i .,1fr.+. k », s. 0 8/ 0 - 2/ 91 . 1 ' 1 0.. 2 / 3 , , '� RETIREMENT # S f '1'� t«j 54.0 ilol �' r= .7 . « J X12 0 S «t 2 2 ,}sue 7 1rt } VOID r_J8 f` 0L... l# 91 C I T >r 0"F ��APLE.WOOD (HCMA) i ! r � 5 - - 3 . � . �(.� ♦ � 13£ EMP 'CR 'UN ION 16{ « .. �.... ... y �' v` t r a 3" D' a.« b` S � 1,3% � y i ! 18 �� }} 22 _4t;.O VOI �D� .8 .,` y «yam.++ 91 COMMERCIAL L I F 1 yt4S 1« A. NICE � � �. 0 j ':' ` , t.t � «r fw..e • 14.✓..dY. V0I D } �i. �` . I RETI PUP I EM ��.Y ASS �'1'.«�R' . K _ ,2 221, ti 0. .1►... L.. •.+ 't:..: " a1 12.+ .:. M S 11 PI 1 i'► : N T St f S ! 3 +... ;1... 2 3 f 1 44 1 _ _ �.t } �... :..,. MN MUTUAL LIFE I INS. 19-3968 127 f 1 29 _ X31 1�2 t .. 00 ! j `Y 2 '33 . 134} :351 ti. w �... �►«. • ti... 0. 3....+ « i.« 1 f � 361 ; « 1MM 2 4 t:..+ 7� �_� � J £.�k.w 1 J .«� .i L, E, L, c.� w ;38; j 08/02/91 RA -MSEY CO SUPPORT COLLECT 495. 38 �41� I l42 �� ;`';� VOID �� , +� >� ,� 1 � =�- Y I C I NS HEAL # �� PLAN � �: >'�. � ;43 44t ... � � � .� � � � «� — A... Y...► } t VOID � , : �� S J� • iw. .J � , C H: �. t 1..� i ,7► > $ T E Y _ ..f ... i. 1! 4 6 t >� x... a.« 1 w ',, . !+ �,, 2 .« .1. t s3 1. s+i 5 +# "s H I C P . } 471 t , { �� i • ..I ..! + �.y ?..��... �.w } +..5 VOID +1..».,► ! .•' t" �j ti.= �.«' /` + �.. � ` .� .l► « � yy...•�. '1' yP.�.'. M y�.+�- TIE y}..yt _ E«' T y!'Ly '231 1 +�C 7' " "Z .M' J. ►..» 7 , t - f % .� D - t �..« t j ice. f 7 ?_`�t S..? l.r' y� � {�� ..J t 'T --� S J 23 'soy '51 452j t.f •.. L«.1►.« ! ! 1 « l.« .+ �.. k... t • t } • i t i�» /r t».� y 1.w• 1 ; 1... ;531 i ! 1541 .. ... .. E t: :. , e AGENDA NO. F� AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE: DATE: Finance Director TRANSFERS TO CLOSE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS August 5, 1991 INTRODUCTION Jati= br; Cotusofl: Date_ It is proposed that transfers be made from the General Fund to eliminate the deficits and close several improvement projects as follows: (a) $20.00 for Project 88 -07, Sterling Street North of Carver Avenue; (b) $287.76 for Project 90 -08, Birmingham -Frost Storm Sewer; (c) $314.95 for Project 89 -13, Community -Wide Storm Sewer; (d) $2,394.17 for Project 88 -15, Ariel Street from Cope Avenue to Castle Avenue; (e) $14,113.37 for Project 89 -03, Roselawn Avenue from Arcade to Interstate 35E. BACKGROUND All but $20 of the cost of the feasibility study for Sterling Street North of Carver Avenue was paid by Phoenix Development Company in 1988. Consequently, a $20 transfer from the General Fund is needed is eliminate the deficit and close the project. The Birmingham-Frost Storm Sewer Project was abandoned by the City in 1990 because the bids were too high. A transfer of $287.76 is needed from the General Fund to this project to finance in -house engineering and administrative charges incurred in 1990. Regarding Project 89 -13 for the Community -Wide Storm Sewer Improvements, preliminary work was done on this in 1989 before it was decided to create individual storm sewer projects for different parts of the City. A transfer of $314.95 is needed from the General Fund to this project to eliminate the deficit and close the project. The Ariel Street Project was rejected by the City Council at a g ublic hearing held on March p 27, 1989 after preliminary engineering costs were incurred. A transfer of $2,394.17 is needed from the General Fund to this project to eliminate the deficit and close the roJ 'ect. p Regarding Project 89 -03 for Roselawn Avenue, a consultant was hired to prep are the 41 . engineenng feasibility study for this project in 1989. The project was denied at a P ublic hearing held on November 16, 1989. A transfer of $14,113.37 is needed from the General Fund to this project to eliminate the deficit and close the project. The 1991 Budget for the General Fund includes $30,000 for transfers to close improvement projects. The above listed transfers total $17,130.25 which will leave $12,869.75 available to close additional projects. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that transfers be made from the General Fund to eliminate the deficits and close several improvement projects as follows: (a) $20.00 for Project 88 -07, Sterling Street North of Carver Avenue; (b) $287.76 for Project 90 -08, Birmingham -Frost Storm Sewer; (c) $314.95 for Project 89 -13, Community -Wide Storm Sewer; (d) $2,394.17 for Project 88 -15, Ariel Street from Cope Avenue to Castle Avenue; (e) $14,113.37 for Project 89 -03, Roselawn Avenue from Arcade to Interstate 35E. tmc . AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Anttoa bZ Council; TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer 'Bruce Irish Dat SUBJECT: Upper Afton Road, McKnight to T.H..120, Project 86-7—Accept Project DATE; August 5, 1991 Introduction The subject project is complete. A resolution is attached to accept the project from the contractor . and to release retainage. A recapitulating change order is also attached. This recapitulating change order itemizes the difference- between actual quantities constructed and. the estimated amount of the bid schedule. all Budget Impact The - final -cost payable to the contractor is $1,220,819.79. Indirect expenses have totaled $276,672.63. With some allowance for indirect expenses not yet received, the final project cost is $1,500,000.00. The costs of items eligible for MSA funding (Division I .and II, together with Change Order One and Two) is $1,159,308.65. With- 18 percent allowable -for engineering and inspection the eligible cost recovery from state aid is $1,367,984.80. As part of the November 8, l 990, agenda report for Project 86 -07, a transfer of the park availability charge funds in the amount of $1,686.00 was requested and approved. The special assessment recovered $96,5T0.20. This equals identified financing of $1,466,181.00. It is proposed to augment the financing b of MSA street construction funds to equal project costs. Proposed Change Order. Three is in the amount of the final amount payable to the contractor of $1,220,819.79, less the original contract amount of $1,122,581.06, and approved change orders in the amount of $32,047.75. Uost of the change in item quantities were in street and storm sewer_ items that are state aid eligible. Recommendation It is recommended that Change Order Three in the amount of $66,190.98 be approved. It is recommended that the resolution to accept the project and release retainage be adopted. BAI I Attachments. RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION. OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has .heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 86 -07 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 86 -07 Change Order Three. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BYTHE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, .MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Three in the amount of $66,190.98*. The project budget is amended to $1,500,000.00. The project financing is amended as follows:. MSA , $1,367,984.80 PAC 11686.00 Special assessments 96,510.20 MSA street construction fund 33,819.00 Total $115001000.00 RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the city. engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that Upper Afton Road, T. H. 120 to McKnight Road, City Project 86 -07 is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 86 -07 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city.- Release of retainage in the amount of $12,200.12 is hereby authorized. CHANGE ORDER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Project name: Upper Afton Road Reconstruction Recapitulation Project: 86 -07 Contractor: Forest Lake Contracting The following changes shall be made in the contract documents.- ITEM Mn /DOT DESCRIPTION UNIT CONTRACT QUANTITY FINAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE NET CHANGE 1 -1 563.601 Traffic control, detour. LS 1 1.00 $5,000.00 $ 0.00 1 -2 563.601 Traffic control, precon. LS 1 1.00 $1,200.00 $0.00 1 -3 563.601 Traffic control, Ph. I LS 1 1.00 $14,000.00 $0.00 1 -4 563.601 Traffic control, Ph. II LS 1 1.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 1 -5 563.601 Traffic control, Ph. III LS 1 1.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 1 -6 563.601 Traffic control, Ph. IV LS 1 0.00 $600.00 ($600.00) 1 -7 563.601. Mobilization LS 1 1.00 $27 $0.00 1 -8 2031.501 Field office w /phone EA 1 1.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 1 -9 2101.511 Clearing & grubbing LS 1 1.00 $13,000.00 $0.00 1 -10 2104.501 Remove fence & posts LF 860 1723.82 $0.85 $734.25 1 -11 2104.501 Remove conc. C & G LF 160 491.95 $4.00 $1,327.80 1 -12 .2104.501 Remove cor. pipe LF 182 233.00 $3.50 $178.50 1 -13 2104.501 Remove reinf. conc. pipe LF 142 238.00 $5.50 $52 8.00 1 -14 2104.505 Remove bit. pave /walk ; SY 18,500 19665.84 $1.20 $1,399.01 1 -15 2104.505 Remove conc. DW apron 'Sy 250 439.21 $4.50 $851.45 1 -16 2104.509 Remove CB /MH EA 4 5.00 $270.00 $270.00 1 -17 21.04.509 Rem. sign base @SA EA 1 1.00 $300.00 $0.00 1 -18 2104.523 Salv. 42" RC pipe apron EA 1 1.00 $150.00 $0.00 1 -19 2105.501 Common excavation CY 20,720 25813.27 $2.75 $14,006.49 1 -20 2105.501 Common exc., sed. pond CY 800 800.00 $2.50 $0.00 1 -21 2105.522 Gran. bor., walk/wall CY 1 3549.00 $6.00 $13 ,494.00 1 -22 2105.525 1 Topsoil borrow CY 1 2 1 4430.00 $5.80 $141094.00 ITEM Mn /DOT DESCRIPTION UNIT CONTRACT QUANTITY FINAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE NET CHANGE 1 -23 2131.502 , Cal. chloride GAL :20 3626.67 $0..90 ($14,736.00) 1 -24 2211.501 Ag.base 5A, 10 c r.( mod ) T 22,000 21510.89 $6.00 ($2,934.66) 1 -25 .2211.501 Ag. base, 5A, 100% cr. T 9,000 11275.81 $6.00 $13,654.86 1 -26 2105.543 Stab. og. 3149H T 60 226.40 $5.00 $832.00 1 -27 2331.514 Bit. base, Type 32 T 3,750 3432.64 $15.25 ($4,839.74) 1.28 2331.518 Binder, 42, ag. B T 2,500 2621.64 $19.20 $2,335.49 1 -29 2331.508 Bit. wear course, 61 T 1,250 1358.79 $29.15 $3,171.23 1 -30 2331.521 2" Type 31 bit., tr /dr. SY 350 1427.27 $7.40 $7,971.80 1 -31 2357.502 Bit. /tack coat GAL 2 1925.00 $1.20 ($450.00) 1 -32 2502.541 4 perf. PE pipe drain LF 180 200.00 $2.50 $50.00 1 -33 2506.511 Reconstruct MH LF 20 21.60 $100.00 $160.00 1 -34 2506.522 Adj. F & R costing EA 25 27.00 $150.00 $300.00 1 -35 0504.602 Adj. valve box EA 13 32.00 $100.00 $1,900.00 1 -36 2521.501 4" concrete walk SF 43,800 42842.50 $1.08 ($1 1 -37 2531.501 Conr-.' C & G, Des. 136 -12 LF 2 3116.90. $3.90 $1,988.61 1 -38 2531.501 Conc. C & G, Des. 136 -18 LF 10,562 10683.54 $4.10 $498.31 1 -39 2531.507 6" cons. drive SY 420 475.65 $19.50 $1,085.18 1 -40 2531.507 8 cons. drive SY 480 257.71 $19.50 ($4,334.66) .1 -41 2535.501 Bituminous curb LF 100 704.50 $3.20 $1 1 934.40 1 -42 2545.511. Warning beacon EA 2 2.00 $3,475.00 $0.00 1 -43 2550.541 6' x 10' loop detector. EA 2 2.00 $436.00 $0.00 1 -44 2550.541 6 x 6' loop detector EA 1 2.00 $398.00 $398.00 1 -45 2557.501 Wire fence, Des. 60 -932 LF 200 200.00 $6.66 $0.0 1 -46 2557.523 Metal brace assembly EA 2 2.00 $41.00 $0.00 1 -47 2573.501 Bale check '' EA 30 0.00 $5.00 ($150.00) 1 -4 2573.503 Silt fence, preassembled LF 5,500 5360.00 $1.90 ($266.00) 1 -49 2575.505 Sodding, Type A SY 26,000 24678.37 $1.16 ($1,533.09) 1 -50 412.604 Keystone retaining wall SF 2 0 ,600 2641.00 $12.60 $516.60 1 -51 0105.609 Geotexile fabric, Type 1 SF 2 1 600 2641.00 $2.00 $82.00 1 -52 511.601 Tensar geogrid SS1 SY 450 550.00 $5.00 $ 1 -53 422.605 6" x 6" timber fence posts EA 84 84.00 $95.00 $0.00 1 -54 412.603 2 x 10" timb. fence railing LF 1,896 1896.00 $3.81 $0.00 1 -55 422.605 8" x 8" timb. post /ret. wall EA 77 77.00 $189.00 $0.00 ITEM Mn /DOT DESCRIPTION UNIT CONTRACT QUANTITY FINAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE NET CHANGE 1-56. 422.602. 4 x 4" timber ret. wall SF 1 1192.00 $6.50 ($1,027.00) 1 -57 422.6.03 2 x 6" wood nailer LF. 350 378.00 $2.25 $63.00 1 -58 504.507 Exc.,assist,Water Ut.,backf. HR 80 69.10 $175.00 ($1,907.50) 1 -59 504.605- 2" poly insulation SY 71 152.76 $.2 5.00 $2,044.00 1 -60 564.602 Pavement message -- arrows EA. 3 4.00 $110.00 $110.00 1 -61 564.602 Pavement message white paint EA 3 0.00 $25.00 ($75.00) 1 -62 564.602 Pavemt. message "ONLY" prof. EA 2 2.00 $140.00 $0.00 1 -63 564.602 Pavemt. message "ONLY" paint EA 2 0.00 $40.00 ($80.00) 1 -64 564.604 24" solid crosswalk, pref. SF 720 708.00 $4.85 ($58.20) 1 -65 564.604 24" solid x -walk, wh. paint SF 7 0.00 $0.35 ($252.00) 1 -66 564.603 24" stop Fine, wh.poly.pref. LF 55 45.00 $9.70 ($97.00) 1 -67 564.603 24" stop line, wh. paint LF 55 0.00 $1.25 ($68.75) 1 -68 564.605 4" solid line, wh. paint RS 176 87.00 $8.6.0 .($765.40) 1 -69 564.605 4 "' solid line, yel. paint RS 76 29.00 $8.60 ($404.20) 1 -70 564.605 4" broken line, yel. paint RS 70 0.00 $8.60 ($602.00) 1 -71 564.605 4" broken line, wh. paint RS 16 8.00 $8.60 ($68.80) 1 -72 564.603 12" solid line, yel. paint LF 320 0.00 $0.35 ($112.00) 1 -73 564.603 4" dbl.solid line, yel.paint LF 1 3116.00 $0.18 $236.88 1 -74 2571.502 2 1/2" American linden EA 38 38.00 $250.00 $0.00 1 -75 2571.502 2 1/2 Norway maple EA 19 19.00 $250.00 $0.00 1 -76 2571.502 2 1/2" Pin oaks EA 119 120.00 $250.00 $250.00 1 -77 2571.502 2 1/2" Sugar maples EA 55 55.00 $250.00 $0.00 1 -78 2571.502 2 1/2" Swamp White oaks EA 40 41.00 $250.00 $250.00 1 -79 2575.513 Mulch material CY 320 320.00 $10.00 $0.00 1 -80 0301.511 Core drill 6" dia. hole /walk EA 6 0.00 $50.00 ($300.00) 1 -81 0504.502 Connect to ex. water main EA 3 3.00 $350.00 $0.00 1 -82 0504.603 8" DIP Cl. 52 water main LF 160 260.00 $20.75 $2,075.00 1 -83 0504.620 MJ DIP fittings LS 880 687.50 .._......._.,:..._,... $1.05 ($202..13) 1 -84 0504.602 8" MJ res. seat gate valve EA 3 3.00 $475.00 $0.00 1 -85 0504.602 1" air vent EA 1 2.00 $325.00 $325 .00 1 -86 0511.601 Geomat, including seed SY 40 189.86 $6.00 $899.16 2 -87 2503.541 12" RC pipe, Cl. 5, Des.3006 LF 536 549. $17.30 $224.90 2 -88 2503.541 15" RC pipe, Cl. 5, Des.3006 LF 1,160 1.524.00 $18.30 $6,661.20 ITEM Mn /DOT DESCRIPTION UNIT CONTRACT QUANTITY FINAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE NET ..CHANGE 2 -89 2503.541 18" RC pipe, Cl. 5, Des.3006 LF 78 771.00 $20.40 ($326.40) 2 -90 2503.541 24 RC pipe, Cl. 3, Des.3006 LF 881 881.00 $23.60 $0.00 2 -91 2503.541 33" RC pipe, Cl. 3, Des.3006 LF 920 916.00 $35.30 ($141.20) 2 - 2503.541 36" RC pipe, Cl. 3, Des.3006 LF 48 48.00 $41.00 $0.00 2 -93 2503.541 42" RC pipe, Cl. 3, Des.3006 LF 92 84.00 $55.00 ($44.0.00) 2 -94 2501.511 24" CP pipe culvert smooth LF 467 664.00 $20.40 .$4,018.80 2 -95. 2501.511 30" CP pipe culvert smooth LF 100 100.00 $24.00 $0.00 2 -96 2501.511 27" CS pipe culvert LF 56 56.00 $18.00 $0, 00 2 -97 2501.511 12" CS pipe culvert LF .81 44.00 $15.00 $540.00 2 -98 2501.511 12" CS pipe culvert slotted LF 20 20.00 $40.00 $0.00 2 -99 2501.573 Saly. 42" RC pipe EA 1 1.00 $1,550.00 $0.00 2 -100 2501.515 15" RC pipe metal guard EA 1 1.00 $530.00 $0.00 2 -101 2501.515 33" RC pipe metal guard EA 1 1.00 $1,550.00 $0.00 2 -102 2501.515 GS pipe metal guard /24" CPP EA 1 1.00 $160.00 $0.00 2 -103 2501.515 GS pipe metal guard /30" CPP EA 1 1.00 $230.00 $0.00 2 -103 2501.515 15" GS pipe metal guard EA 1 1.00 $130.00 $0.00 2 -104 2506.509 Const. 2' x 3' CB EA 18 19.00 $700.00 $700.00 2 -105 2506.509 Const. 4' dia. CB EA 4 4.00 $800.00 $0.00 2 -106 2506.509 Const. 5' dia. CB EA 2 2.00 $1,230.00 $0. 2 -107 2506.509 Const. 6' diameter CB EA 2 1.00 $1,900.00 ($1,900. 2 -108 2506.509 Const. CB 1 EA 1 1.00 $5,400.00 $0.00 2 -109 2506.508 Const. 4' dia. st. swr. MH EA 7 8.00 $800.00 $800.00 2 -110 2506.508 Const. 5' dia. st. swr. MH EA 4 4.00 $1 $0.00 2 -111 2506.508 Const. '6' dia. st. swr. MH EA 4 4.00 $1,700.00 $0.00 2 -112 2511.501 Cl. II rip rap. CY 33 33.00 $60.00 $0.00 2 -113 2501.573 Inst.27" x 15" prefab.CM tee EA 1 .1.00 $180.00 $0.00 2 -114 2501.573 Inst. Weir, posts & timbers EA 1 1.00 $4,400.00 $0.00 3 -115 Connect to Ex. water main EA 1 2.00 $600.00 $600.00 3-116 6 x 6" wet tap & gate valve EA 1 1.00 $1,300.00 3 -117 6" DIP Cl. 53 water main LF 70 165.00 $18.30 $1,738.50 3 -118 8" DIP Cl. 52 water main LF 503 524.00 $21.00 $441.00 3-119 4" MJ seat gate valve EA .1 . 1.00 $ 300.00 $ 0.00 3 -120 6" MJ seat gate valve EA 4 5.00 $350.00 $350.00 ITEM Mn /DOT DESCRIPTION UNIT CONTRACT QUANTITY FINAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE NET - CHANGE 3 -121 8" MJ seat gate valve EA 1 1.00 $475.00 $.0.00 3 -122 6" MJ hub hydrant EA 2 2.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 3 -123 6" MJ hub.hydrant- furnish EA 3 6.00 $920.00 $2,760.00 3 -124 6" hydrant extension LF 2 0.50 $550.00 ($825.00) 3 -125 12" hydrant extension LF 2 4.00 .$300.00 $600.00 3 -126 1" Type K copper tap serv. LF 215 221.35 $17.20 $109.22 3 -127 Connect to ex.' water service EA 6 6.00 $350.00 $0.00 3 -128 1" Corp. stop EA 5 5.00 $65.00 $0.00 3 -129 1" curb stop w /curb box EA 5 6.00 $80.00 $80.00 3 -130 MJ CIP fittings LB 3 1695.40 $1.05. ($1,572.48) 4 -131 San. Swr. repair, PVC SDR 35 EA 4 4.00 $1,100.00` 4 -132 4" or 6" Sch 40 replacemt.. LF 337 271.10 $20.40 ($1,344.36) 4 -133 15" PVC SDR 35 san.swr. pipe LF 72 72.00 $30.90 $.0.00 5 -135 2571.505 3" pot Amur maple EA 96 100.00 $25.00 $100.00 5 -136 2571.505 4" pot Fleece flower EA 5,360 5060.00 $2.00 ($600.00) $66,190.98 Original contract: $1,122,581.06 Net change of prior Change Order l and 2 $ 32,047.75 Change this change order: $ 66,190.98 Revised contract: $1,220,819.79 Approved Mayor Approved Agreed to by contractor by Its Engineer Title AAItion t; Council: Mod1f let�010...•. W AGENDA ITEM F` Rea 90to�.,r....., .... Date MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio Subj: Nature Center Donation Date: July 24, 1991 Introduction The Maplewood Nature Center received $50.00 from Jeanne Ewald and her family to use where there was.a need. The money will be spent for the purchase of a larger rabbit cage. A thank you letter has been sent to Jeanne Ewald. Recommendation It is requested that the City Council accept the $50.00 donation from Jeanne Ewald and her family and increase the Program Sup- plies Budget Account (101- 604 - 000 -4120) for the Nature Center by $50.00. ✓ c: City Clerk F -5 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT LOCATION: DATE INTRODUCTION City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Review 2696 Hazelwood Avenue July 23, 1991 Aotlon bjr CoUnol . Date On August 13, the City Council approved a change to the planned unit development at.2696 Hazelwood Avenue. The change was to convert the former Health Resources building to a church and day care center. One of the conditions was that the Council review the permit in one year. DISCUSSION The church and day care center have met all the conditions of their conditional use permit. The Church moved in last February and the day care center has been operating there for several years. The Church is planning to build a new sanctuary within two years. The conditional use permit requires that the Church bring back final plans for the sanctuary to the Council for approval. RECOMMENDATION Review this permit again when the Church has developed plans for their new sanctuary. kr /memo4 l . mem (section 3 ) Attachments 19 Location Map 20 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Master Plan Site Concept 4. 7 -9 -91 letter 65 WHI r. t . a 169 --1 v D A N /S HE Gr H s ... o� a ................... ... ............:�:................ .. �g CO RO D C RD E ...... ....... Q E : ....... .... N Cr X c.. W t p N V 1 = O W {{ c > 4 tl! f 3 c LY OI A FDwgR . G � N ........... . ~ ST a S T. o 9 sn _ �o _ L 19 a H MS �( LW c � � _ BEAM .. � LARK AV r--� Y. 3 o Hts U C •• J RaDAT . [r U. Koh/man Loke / D KOHLMAN c AV 2 orth W KOHLMAN AV Hazelwood o N Pk R 0 u t 3 Q --- co > R0 23 E if Z T29N,R22W xc�htino� W Pk (1) F z N a w a 3 2 >_ / o C� ►� W � Cr 3 J 0�1 i v ,2 av�' T C �. os $ ¢ EDG EHILL RD rs� .� i Norve N _j W ...�, st W (1) CON NOR AV a Pk DEMONT AV o c� v ? N )KS 0 0 I B RO AV 4 z ELEVF Q SEXTANT c Four AV PQ 4 XTAN T AV A S;eosons Pk GERVAIS AV a GERVAIS GE?4A, GERVAIS Ay =; �t(WY GRANDAEW AV W CT `Q m VIKING OR x E AV _ HERREN AV !_ N COPE,- CT Co ?E AV f�nvck/e Heod Lake P oA S�LE _ CO AV le - LARK AV L ARK a N l� t$ G? Co 0 40 9 LAURIE Q A c R Y W = LA RIE RD . , I Sh x ' 25 LELANO RO SAND- HURST woPPkZ AV c Z z a ' RO .. 25 Z o JUNCTION STc Y CO Ct AV ° c BURKE o Robinhood AV v (1) CHAMBERS ST m �k ELDRIDG E AV � . C#y Ha# LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment I I o ^z3 .BOO • MOAN V F P EW tN VILLAGE O MA L OOD POND G AREA 79 54 o 99 2' f Doc 161 , 15(0 3 1- 13 - '72. 8) 2767 0 4 0.9 2 ' 2759 o Ati (20. g odc) O � 3 33 .10. 03� 2747 00 3 S +S 2730 (7 (7 2737 ;.• 3 • ::. � .•.•.. ,�. E 30 Q . ...................... s t too s ...... ... . ... . . . t ........ ...... .... ......... ................. 271 . ; ........................ .......... ................... .............. . ... . .. .............. .... -� •..., • • •.... 1 2 11 (4) :...... V S 55 O 2727 .�....... ; ........ :......: .... .. ............ ti t ::•:::• :•:•:•:•:•::• :• :•:•:: •:•:•:•:•:•:: :•::�:' •7�: to 0 t ............. .... ............ . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to 57 7' ............. ..... ........... ................,.......... X . : ..... ............. .......................... ............................. ..............................: ..................... ....... ............................... 2 (0 5 :;�: ;: ; : ; :;:;: ;: ;: ;:;:;:;: �: ......... ...... ......... N ........�........... ... ....... too 2707 :::::::::::::::::::. ' :::::;:� ::::::.:.. Q ... . .. . . . . .. . . . . . N ..... •.•. ::•.•, ti•.•.•:.... ... ........ ..9 . to .......... ..... ............ 1 .i•............................ too ............ 0 ' 8 01 21 -7 ' .............................. w....•......•......:........ . 1 8 X . ............................... .........:.........,......... ............................... r 0... Yet 'f�Y�.' ....... .. ............................ CJ ..........r { ......................... V1 ......................... .......................... 2673 �, ...... ............................... . ................... . .............................. .. .... ........................ Nry ........................;..... ............................... .... ..........................�.,�. ... .:........... ........• to It's bT/L1Tti — - — -• — • 21 681 6 2680 r (w 6 0 N 6 7 0 2 72 "' § (IB)I 0 R= G 6 Q p' p m 'C 22 3 �N q C _ 267 2666 2.1aac _ C O3o 2661 Q 7g I - Q ---- ��_ --' 6 � 67•13 75 2645 ( 10 ) 1 co i — (9) ! 33,265 85.: 7 5 .01 _ .._. CO. RD. C — -- -- 5 39.86oa�-. F PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP R -1 = Single Family Residential C 3 Planned Unit Development R -2 = Double Dwelling F =Farm Residential Church Project 4 n 3 Attachment 2 s. f' S _ v Xe V a to LY Pauvam LM ucr • � • � � •. 1 :• • • : !:� • •. q O J .. � . • • l V 1 {y' �. •! M� �:T 1. _ 'f:1l: :;tit \. :•: �:: }:Y •:••:• .)�: y: > y�•} � }r .; ; }:•:•..:. r--. f 1 �. f T Wit' G I _ X250 � : X . is 1 Ak L 1 I 7� LOW M i i r Y v ( i I _ � I 5A- , 0044AON D 2y Sphcw' e tot 40�4 tAqLro �Ly $!LN!AV MASTER PLAN SITE CONCEPT Stati 19 AI'Ct1iNCts. okMRF • 2001 University Avenue Southeast Da l* Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Drawn ' . (612) 623- 1800 Ch octrod Ro�isod 4 Attachment • 3 C?ATAhRINT N32323 ■ ❑Q FIRST EVANGELICAL CHURCH July 9 1991 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Attn: Ken Roberts 2696 Hazelwood Street Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 777 -5180 Dear S irs , August 13, 1990 the First Evangelical Free Church of St. Paul, Minnesota received a revised conditional use permit for a Planned Unit Developement (PUD) to use the property at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue as.a church and day care center. We request that the permit be extended. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James A. Gust fson Elder ROBERT F. GIBSON, Interim Pastor * BRUCE W. FISCHER, Worship and Music * SHELDON J. CARLSON, Youth and Christian Education 5 Attachment 4 .rr- 6 MEMORANDUM TO FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Review 1983, 1997 and 2025 Sloan Place St. Paul.Business Center East Towle Real Estate August 2, 1991 Action by Couno is fndoree Modified..,,�,.,�, Rej scte&__.,..., Date INTRODUCTION August 25, 1986, the City Council approved a five -year time extension for the conditional use permit CUP for the St. Pau .Business Center East, BACKGROUND On June 11, 1984, the City Council approved this CUP. Council granted a one -year time extension on July 8, .1985 and a five-year extension on August 25, 19860 DISCUSSION The screening fence along McMenemy Street needs repair. Gary Hird, the property manager, said he will repair the fence this August. Staff will check to make sure they repair it. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit again in five years. te\centeast . mem (section 18 ) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan W iI v v ' w 0 37 W U Cr r36 L /T TL E CANADA SA /N T W PM 0 Q U Ir a n6l LOCATION MAP Q N 2 Attachment 1 •s o� ZA - 70 arc ) �3.�J2ae� l3 j (14) • ST. PAUL BUSINESS CENTER WEST (27) (z 5) LVIJV .Re.Q,• •::'.;... t •.•:•::...:. • :.; •. 5 ,4. 3 �. 6 ..... •4 :: • :•: T::...:.:.. .... .: So 5r 52. �5 1 (54) _ ... . 1984 �. � • ::::. ; . • :; ::� •: '• • , . �.. .�:.:....... •' �5• 1978 (8. 3 '' ='�. :•::. :. :. :.. :. 6 -4 1 �- 9 (7)Ej? ZEN :. .:: .. .. ..,...... ({ 5 1962'` ..: ..; ... . .. W wit C C) ( 19 56 .. ; ;...... .... .�... .....� . _..__.• -q V E4- g 3 l 3� a -1942 s , '%b W' w/. I kva.le:1 i d (•oe) (ws) ( -w) Cri} o 0 .1928.�Q� �+! 13) 0'' 4 ; _�_ i lz - ROS ELAWN AVENUE < (32) (z3) c ) 5 _q 5 + re s L)� ( 71 0 s All �o — io 340 ( 37) � (.37) . .•a to �• 38� Cie)�Ct� 0 18 11 • J Q �I .0 3 9 (17) QL, t �• IBS 1 le • ID 4 .a Q 2 X *)20S4 c20SS :• k%2046 - �— p47 1 (,_) t4 b I lu - . N ST PAUL BUSINESS ,. .... CENTER EAST -r ` .. x. •�` .�: �' ` .• ; :•; •• + :. h � • .•; ; ;, e •• ; .. : ;::::::• ; .. , , PARKS IDE •:.::.. ::.:::::. .::• FIRE STATION -JS m at 0i NCR r, o .39 (4) L 1.39 (9) '& OFFICE BUILDING = 9 4 l' 80 � m i 1 1 08 t o ENTRE COMPUTER = 6 t i 234 � 33 o s J .= _ .�, - r . 77 � PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N SITE PLAN a Attachment 3 L l AN. lrt ... .. .. .. .. ........ ...... ........ .. .. n.. •...... ..v . ...... w lr:.r .. .. ... ..:r.. .r .. r ....... .. ..... ..n ... .. .... .... . : {..,. `•: fir`':. .... .... r... ... .. .. ..... .. .: .... .:.:. ::.:':: nv: ::: i'•:: v.v.. .... r � } :�� {�:.4:v: :: v.,, . ♦:.:::: .::.v:: n . r,,.. ...:: :•. ::: .... f::i:; ;. r• :v: Y.v; . - .......x.. ... .. ..... ... ...... Y. Y..... .. r ..... ........ ...........v....... .. ...... �. t � .. .. •.. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .... .:...... .... .. ': . .. ..:::.:.''• }:•i •:" ...+.J } >:'- {;.; i} l•�• 't :Q:. -: fn: <ti ??{ . h }:jtt� "v K.+W n'. .A .:: iX -: r .. ... r,: ..�� :•t.::,, •. :.itiJ'J }: {iti:v{•: iii ;:: { y v:, ....v: .}`.�: \:v :. is i�. . [....... .. Y.v..... {.. n J•.f. ?.'i':ii: . }yf.Y }r %. : JiC .. to r.? .... ........ ... : ...:. ..:.. .x: .k n..... .. ... wI • ... • .. ..... .:. .. .... ..... .....'::: ., r.. .:: .. :: �F•i:•.... v >'tr ?'� J.. Kt4Fri:' ...... .......... .... ....n...... .. r........ ......t:•...:.. •...... .. - : �. ..... ... ♦ ...... : :.ri }tit. :(n`••.:_ : }J}:kr::tJ: :� .. ,.:. .n.•. ......v ... .. r... •X .. ..... : . ... .. .. .... .. �:} } >:::::: :: : 1 .�. .�. i:`' ii%::v ::•:^.Gi:•:b: {: >.... •:4 :w� ."l :}: f !` •.::r ::: {. t .. .. • .r f Y' •.,yr.,, :J: 2.. t r } .:�/� :•: �'•• )i 4 �yi �.�. - �Ttt, {� � :�r' ��.. .�\ � ... ;..... -...i � 5, ..v.:. +•. .� •• � r'•: y {, { • . ..: ...... ....: .. :.v h ' >•:t: }:. ....... � {: 1� �.. J \ ! . .J J ♦,' i: }O r..•;ti ••P•: }:..Y.. fi }Y::J. : ;� ?ka :k �!�':v:`: {�'" � W�; ..<{!.!•,i. . .!• f i:� ' ,I • Y �• f 2 1 •, �1. ��1R ° IE f ;::,:,. , tom . 1 i • • � � � f Ay Y . ........... < W _v bId9. 1 bldg. 2 .. �•� ..':. :... k ilt 1� � 28800 28800 lam:• ..:. .w w / J >c , 2 0 .. ... cr) .. ;::.. .:: ; x • line '. .: ...:" .. .:. .. ..' dlr. ...:. ST.PAUL BUSINESS CENTER EAST SITE PLAN a Attachment 3 MEMORANDUM ACUM by C ounc i l : TO C it Ma Nndox . City Man ager d.� FROM. Tom Eks trand Assoc odified ate Planner �-�-� :SUBJECT: Conditional Use e Re LOCATION: _ Permit Review � eate 225 255 East Roselawn Avenue Date APPLICANT: Towle Real Estate PROJECT TITLE: St. Paul Business Ce nter West DATE: August 2, 1991 INTRODUCTION On August 2.5 , 1986, the Cit Council approved a five-year time extension for the conditional use ermit Business Center Wes p (CUP) for the St . Paul West BACKGROUND On February 19, 19.81 Ramsey ount D must is y Y Court ruled that the Cit Y sue a CUP for this office /industrial center, On December 28, 1987, Counci • �. pproved a rev to the CUP subject to the original conditions • � of approval. This revision allowed the business center to add parking* 'Council ' change the next review date it did n ot to from 1991. DISCUSSION The Center has followed all of the PUD ' conditions. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use ermit • p again i years. to \centwest.mem (section 18) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan ( Re �tJ v v Lu L / T T'L E CANADA sA /NT x� W G Q v it Q 7 \ 3 n6l LOCATION MAP 2 Attachment I Nnowwwwow Q N r .s o� ( Z0. cu ) JUL ow s• •�� ' �1.•32oa� -, ST. PAUL BUSINESS CENTER WEST q _ C30 � • _ 1 2 I Cis (33� �3 77. C �f M 7 -1 7 :: ' �::::•: '•:: :'ti•:: : :.•::'•:'� : '• (!�� (1o) t9 �o • . :• .......... r 1978 ::::. .. .. .... .... 2 Q4 1 •� 1 054 2 055 ,2Q46 hC T I— 5 - .; •..•: ; .:; � ! 7V LPL •.• ...... % .. � - • r;�) . IZ 1 "•: • •� ':'• • .:: • • ::•::... � ::.......::..:.•....::....... ... ............ y A E7 f :: i :: • : ,•: :: :: :::,• :.•: • 4 3 i 1 0 - --- -- - -- - -- 5- I�os 1 , 1934`) Sr�p �s - fn. y 928 � .1 i wo �� ►� ` .1 Ln - ROSELAWN AVENUE �'.� �` �'- ' '9 " ON ISO T ---- �-- q _ C30 � • _ (7 <S) � 'r~� 5 s (33� �3 77. C - �37) to (!�� (1o) t9 �o • r IBS 1 } t� 2 Q4 1 •� 1 054 2 055 ,2Q46 hC :f:= :••:•::�•••: ••:: �. a ARRSIDE ��' .•::: ::• :': •: I ... ;. .. ': .. :.•' � .. :: :�. .:...::..•::: •.::: : :.:•::::: :.•::.: :: FIRE STATION .:. Q :. :::!lair. ! � a8 •55 - NCR .39 174 a o ( t.. ( " -too io8� OFFICE BUILDING 4 Q o ENTRE COMPUTER 3 4, 8 ! 93 WIN ��'� O /Y� moo - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N I o � r QtLiL! c r- ;I BM � as ■ I I I i 1 I a I i e I I I I I 1 . I I la I I ST . PAUL BUSINESS CENTER WEST 4 Attachment 3 F-0- 9 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review LOCATION: 2120 2124 Woodlynn Avenue OWNERS: Howard and Carla Rekstad PROJECT TITLE: The Village on Woodlynn DATE: July 25, 1991 INTRODUCTION AWL= by Counci M odif i ed.�.,,,.�.� �... Dat On August 13, 1990, the City Council approved a one -year time extension for the conditional use permit .(CUPS for The Village on Woodlynn. (This'project was formerly called The Cottages of Maplewood.). BACKGROUND On December 14, 1987, the City Council granted the CUP. Council granted renewals on July 20, 1989 and August 13, 19909 At the August 13 meeting, the Council requested that Mr. Rekstad install additional evergreen trees on top the easterly berm next to 2144 Woodlynn Avenue as soon as there is money available. Carla Rekstad told me that they do not have.the money to plant these evergreens right now. DISCUSSION The project is finished. All conditions of approval are met, but there are some dead trees. Carla Rekstad said they will replace the dead plantings before the end of this year's planting season. Council should review the CUP to make sure the dead trees have been replaced. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit again on October 28. te\village.cup (section 2) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Pr operty Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan D C0 RD T �oy ir e s x 0 Z W Y f. r . MARK M POND Z North w e cv Hazelwood i Pk w c� cn a cr 2_ a i XTAN T AV W 1 0 A� l �o Q WHITE BEAR LAKE 68 (1) BRENW00D CURVE C o GALL AV w Cr _ w0+ AV n l 23 „ c - AV AV I rn+t s S,a t, A V/ NORTH SA IN T PA UL LOCATION MAP 2 Attachment-.1 N V 4 WOODLYPN HE 4 00 VP orf•0G ( .3-3 '`O 631.3 . WOO D LY N AVE -�� --11 tjn 34 41' 1 tto r►o' N 1 6 a 7 0 8 � ;^ 2144.0) (3�) N co 030 nl �1 v P r 4• . (0 7 a.t/ X1 4 I � . � . � �► bye .� �D CO ( ?-B) CIO ? c 78 .98-5 4 o '1 F-- a 71ax, N ' COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD Cif SALVATION ARMY CHURCH .4 39, I.J �o 3' W �r in C' ti• /3 21,x, � .• /o.� •'21.47 X9.3 5 ;oZ.or �z vt vZ a•a , `'°` u G (2 o' 1 V 1 ( 1 (Z o, O O A J N ` O. ♦ N � h � r IZJ, .,� 0 12 c 13 CD GrZ ( !.Z O — -- •7: a AVF . t�'� LYDIA e .Q D�•c . )7 OL 4 Z 9 ', 135 60 135 135' 40 135 �3S 6 0 i3 103.1.8' 105' 6� ID�e.6' roc t ° }, 0 10 o I 0 10 ° I >- o o, 1 2 n 30 3 0 14 l 2 ZG) 3 (2-5) �16� - Y (1 °� �� c o I �� o rr, M ,p 'A a 0) 1 (7✓ (741 ° w ,° a r, I Io•�t (6 10 9r 46 o N O 0 � h h p T �c 7) PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 ttachment 4 N WOODLYNN AVE N Attachment SITE PLAN -4 um r July 15, 1991 RE: MAPLEW04D, ,MI- NNESOTA TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS BEAM AVENUE FINAL PAYMENT (NO. 6) . S.. 62.- 619 -14 SEH FILE NO. 90044 Mr. Ken Haider Public Works Director •� ,City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B l Maplewood MN 55109 Dear Mr. Haider: Enclosed is the final payment forms (p No, 6 r ) for const ucti.on of the traf f is signal systems along Beam Avenue (from the South Maplewood Mall entr to Hazelwood 'Street) and .the left turn lane construction (on Beam Avenue at the South Maplewood Mall entrance intersection). ccordin to q uantities 9 of material supplied and .work performed that have been certified by Ramsey County (and agreed to by Collins Electric) as of May 23, 1991 a final payment of $13 is Y authorized to be paid to Collins Electric. The total contract. amount was $262,721.80. Total value of work certified by Ramsey County was $261 254.78. In accordance with agreements 89022 89023 and 89024 between the City of Maplewood and Ramsey County, 3 percent, of the design and inspection costs are to.be shared between the County and the City of Maplewood respectively. Thus, the total County share of the project ( under S.A.P. 62 619 - 14) is $80,366.59, w ith the remaining. $180,888.19 coming from City funding, Of the $13 ,062,74 r $1 is covered under S.A.P. 62- 619 -14, with the. remaining $11 746.24 coming from City funding . ' Also enclosed with the final payment No. 6 are cop p es of the Contract Status, Schedule. of Participation Costs (based on final quantities) between the City of - Maplewood and Ramsey County, and a certified IC -134 Withholding - Affidavit for Contractors ( from Collins Electric) for the Maplewood traffic signal and l eft eft turn lane construction project, SHORT. ELLIOTT ST PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN A Mr . Ken Haider July 15, 1991 Page ##2 Please process for payment Ito Collins Electric as soon as possible. If you have any questions or need any further information regarding this or anything else related to the Beam Avenue project, please contact me at 490 -2073 . .. We appreciated the opportunity to work for the City of Maplewood, p , and look forward to working again with you and the st-af f of the City in the future . Sincerely, John M. Gray Project Engineer JMG /cmb F'AR47443 RAMSfY COUNTY F'USLICAF ;KS F'A6f iF 1 PATtTICIPATION COSTS 06j01j91 SAP 62 BEAN AVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CON 47443 HAZELWOOD ST TO KAPLEVOOD MALL ENT BASED ON FINAL qUANTITY tzzzzzzszzztz - CONTRACT YORK CONTRACTOR- -- COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONTT CO. { PARTICIPATION I -- - ------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- - - - - -- ----------------------------- FINAL --------- UNIT TOTAL ------ ------------------ , - - - - CITY ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT gUANTITY PRICE AKOUNT C.S.A.H, , KAPLEVOOD 2565.511 FULL T ACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A SIG SYS 1.00 ( $89,000.00 1 $89,000,00 1 $44,500.00 ( $44,500.00 0565,604 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM B S.YSTEK 1.00 ( $6,550.00 1 $6,550.00 1 $030 1 $6,550.00 2565.511 FULL T ACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM C. SIG SYS 1.00 1 $101,500.00 1 $101,500.00 1 $0. $101,500.00 { 0565.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL INTERCONNECTION L. SUM 1.00 ( $12,832.00 $12,831.00. $2,139.09 1 $10,692.91 1 0565.602 HANDHOLE.TYEE C (INTERCONNECT) EACH 12,00 ( $290.00 ( $3,480.00 ( $SF0.11 $2,899.88 0565.603 2' NON KETALLIC CONDUIT (INTERCONNECT) L.F. 2680.00 ( $2 -20 1 1 $982.86 1 $4,913.14 I 0565.603 12 PAIR 11.9 CABLE (INTERCONNECT) L.F. 4290.00 ( $1.30 ( . $5,856.00 $5,517.00 1 $929.69 1 $4,647.31 0565.601 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE SYSTEM A L. SUN 1.00 ( $g50.00 { $950.00 1 $0.00 1 $950.00 1 0565.601 EKERGENC.Y VEHICLE PRE-EKPTION SYSTEK C L. SUN 1.00 1 $1,390.00 1 $1,390.00 1 $0.00 1 $1,390.00 .1 0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L. SUM 140 ( $1,550.00 1 $1,550,00 ) $1,550.00 1 $0.00 1 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE PIPE L.F. 21.00 ( $8.00 1 $168.00 ( $168.00 ( $0.00 1 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L.F. 318.00 1 $2.26 1 $141.18 1 $741.28 1 $0.00 2104 -509 REM OVE CATCH BASIN EACH 2.00 1 $195.00 ) $390.00 ( $390.00 i $0.00 1 2104,509 REMOVE HANDHOLE EACH 1.00 1 $95.00 ( $95.00 1 $95.00 1 $0.00 1 2104.513 SAVING SITUKINOUS,PAVEMENT L.F. 108.00 ( $1.95 1 $210.60 1 $210 -60 1 $0.00 1 2104.523 SALVAGE CATCH BASIN CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 2.00 1 $63.00 1 $126.00 1 $116.00 ( $0.00 1 2105.501 COKK-�M EXCAVATION (P) C.Y. 300.00 1 $13.70 ( $4 $4,110.00 1 $0.00 1 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (C.V.) C.Y. 0.00 ( $30.00 ( $0.00 1 $0..00 1 $0.00 1 2331.504 BITUKINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON 8.80 1 I ( $130.00 1 $1. I I 1 $1,144.00 1 i . $0.00 1 233 1.5.14 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 136.00 ( $23.00 1 $3,128.00 1 $3,128.00 1 $0.00 i 2341.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR KIXTURE TON 7.50 1 $131.00 1 $9.82.50 1 $982.50 1 $0.00 1 2341.510 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON 117.00 ( $35.00 i $4,095.00 1 $4,095.00 1 $0.00 1 1357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK.COAT GALLON 55.00 ( $1040 1 $77.00 1 $71.00 1 $0.00 i 2361.504 ASPHALT CEMENT TON 2.10 1 $132.00 .1 $.271,20 1 $211.10 1 $0,00 1 2361.508 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 37.00 1 $68.00 1 $2,516.00 ( $2,516.00 1 $0.00 i 2503.541 12' RCP STORK SEVER DES.3006 CL.V L.F. 21.00 l ( $44.00 1 . 1 $924.00 i ( $914.00 1 I $0.00 i 1503.541 15' RCP STORK SEWER DES.3006 CL.V L.F. 5.00 ( $58.00 ( $290.00 ( $290.00 ( $0.00 1 2506.509 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN TYPE Y EACH 2.00 1 $1,850.00 1 $3,100.00 1 $3,100.00 1 $0.00 1 2506.602 CONN INTO EXISTING STORK SEVER EACH 3.00 1 $561.00 1 $1 ( $1 1 $0.00 1 2506.602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING KANHOLE EACH 3,00 1 $567.00 1 $1,701.00 ( $1,701.00 1 $0.00 1 2506,602 ADJUST MANHOLE EACH 1.00 ( $200.00 1 $200.00 1 $200.00 1 $0.00 1 . ` 2521.503 4' CONCRETE TERRACE S.F. 368.00 1 $2.20 ( $809.60 ( $809.60 ( $0.00 1 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN 8624 L.F. 393.00 ( $7.70 ( $3,026.10 1 $3,026.10 1 $0.00 1 2575.505 SODING, TYPE EROSION CONTROL S.Y. 385.00 I ( $5.50 ( I $2,117.50 ( ( $2,117.50 ( I $0.00 1 1 PROJECT TOTAL $261,254.78 $83,211.54 $178,043.24 1 4% DESIGN COSTS $2,496.35 (3S OF COUNTY SHARE. - - -- --------------- FOR CITY DESIGN} $85,707.89 3S INSPECTION COSTS (CREDIT) ($5,34.1.30} ( 3S OF CITY .SHARE FOR --------- - - - - -- COt1NTY INSF'ECTION) TOTAL COUNTY COST TO CITY ----- > $801366.59 1 RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PARTIAL PAYMENT NO, 6 (FINAL) 350 ST, PETER STREET, SUITE 27 ST s PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 FOR: CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH EVP SYS, CONTRACT N0, INTERCONNECT AND LEFT TURN LANE, BEAN AVE, HAZELWOOD ST. TO MAPLEWOOD MALI ENT, 100 % COMPLETED PROJECT NO, S,A.P. 62-619 -14 CON 47443 - TOTAL VALUE OF WORK CERTIFIED 5/23/91 $261,254,7.8 LESS RETAI.NAGE 0 x $0,00 . - - - - - - - - - $261,254, 78 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $248,192,04 ALLOWABLE PAYMENT THIS PARTIAL $13,062,74 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT AND FIND THE WORK LISTED BELOW HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------------------------------------ DATE PROJECT ENGINEER, DANIEL E,. SOLER -- ---- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- -q jO ------- DATE CONT,' COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO, UNIT CONTRACT - - - -- -THIS STATEMENT-- - ITEM N0, ITEM UNIT PRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MATERIALS ON HAND L,S, 2565,511 FULL T ACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM A SIG SYS $69,000.00 1000 $89,000,00 1 $89,00.0,.00 0565,604 REVISE SIGNAL SYSTEM B SYSTEM $6,550,.00 1100 $6,550,00 1 $6,550,00 2565,511 FULL T ACT T CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM C SIG SYS $101,500,:00 1,00 $101,500,00 1 $101,500,00 0565,601 TRAFFIC CONTROL INTERCONNECTION L, SUM $12,832,00 1 00 $12,832,00 1 $12,832,00 0565,602 HANDHOLE TYPE C (INTERCONNECT) EACH $290,00 12,00 $3,48030 12 $.3,480,00 0565,603 2" NON METALLIC CONDUIT (INTERCONNECT) l,F,. $2,20 2700000 $5,940,00 2680 $5,896,00 0565,603 12 PAIR 119 CABLE (INTERCONNECT) LtFt $1,30 4400,00 $5,720,00 4.290 $5,577,00 0565,601 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION SYSTEM A L, SUM $950,00 1100 $950,00 1 $950,00 0565,601 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION SYSTEM C L, SUM $1,390,00 1,00 $1,390,00 1 $1,390,00 0563,601 TRAFFIC CONTROL ` L, SUM $1,550.00 1,00 $1,550,00 1 $1 2104,501 REMOVE CONCRETE PIPE L,F, $8,00 . 24,00 $192,00 21 $168,00 2104,501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB L,F, $2,26 330,00 $745,80 328 $741,.28 2104,509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EACH $195,00 2,00 $390,00 2 $390,00 2104,5 REMOVE HANDHOLE EACH $95,00 1,00 $95,.00 1 $95,00 2104,513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT L,F, $1,95 420.00 $819,00 108 $210,60 2104,523 SALVAGE CATCH BASIN CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH $63,00 2,00 $1.26,00 2 $126,0.0 2105,501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) C,Y, $13,70 300,00 $4,110,00 300 $4,110,00 2105,522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (C,V,} C,Y, $30,00 35,00 $1,050.00 0 $0,00 PAY47443 Page 1 of 2 K„ ' RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PARTIAL PAYMENT N0, 6 (FINAL) 350 ST, PETER STREET, SUITE 210 ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 FOR. , CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS WITH EVP SYS, CONTRACT N0. INTERCONNECT AND LEFT TURN LANE, BEAM AVE, HAZELWOOD ST, TO.MAPLEWOOD MALI ENT, 100 x COMPLETED PROJECT NO, S,A.P, 624619-14 CON 41443 UNIT - - - - - - - CONTRACT - - - - - ---THIS STATEMENT-- - ITEM NO, --------- - w ITEM - w w - • - -------- - - - - - -- - - - - w w UNIT - ------------ PRICE - - - - - - - - - - - - QUANTITY - - -- - w --------- AMOUNT QUANTITY - ----------------------------------- AMOUNT - 2331.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON $130,00 14,00 $1,820,00 8,8 $1,144,00 2331.514 BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $23.00 240,00 $5,520,00 13 $3,128.00 2341.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE TON $131,00 5.00 $655.00 1,5 $982,50 2341,510 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE TON $.35,00 80600 $2,800.00 111 $4,095,00 2351,502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON $1,40 55,00 $11.00 55 $11,00 .2361 s504 ASPHALT CEMENT TON $132,00 2.00 $264,.00 2,1 $21]..20 2361.508 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON $68,00 25.00 $1,100,00 31 $2,516,00 2503,541 12" RCP STORM SEWER DES,3006 CL,V L.F. $44.00 21_.00 $924,00 21 $924,00 2503,541 15" RCP STORM SEWER DES,3006 CL,V l,F, $58,00 530 $290.00 5 $290.00 2506,509 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN TYPE Y. EACH $1,850,00 2,00 .$3,100,00 2 $3,700,00 2506,602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH $567 *00 3,00 $1,101.00 3 $.1,101,00 2506,602 CONNECT INTO EXISTING MANHOLE EACH $561,00 3,00 $1,101,00 3 $1,101,00 2506,602 ADJUST MANHOLE EACH $200,00 2,00 $400,00 1 $200,00 2521,503 4" CONCRETE TERRACE S,F, $2,20 3150.00 - .$825,00 3 $809.60 2531,501 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN B624 L,F, $1,10 400600 $3,080,00 393 $3 1 026010. 2515,505 SODING, TYPE EROSION CONTROL S , $5,50 15040 $825,00 385 -- - - - - - - - -- $2,111,50 - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL $262,121,80 $261 PREPARED BY CHECKED BY. - - - --- - - - - -- - - - - --- PAY47443 Page 2 of 2 G —/ MEMORANDUM TO FROM: ,SUBJECT* LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT TITLE: DATE City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Conditional Use Permit 2675 E. Larpenteur Avenue St Paul's Priory Day Care Center July 17, 1991 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Ra d o r se..... NodifIGA— P1 anner 26J sot+ Date St. Paul's Priory is requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) fora day care center. The City has zoned this property R -3 (multiple dwelling) . City Code requires a conditional use p ermit for day care centers in an R -3 zone [section 36- 437(3)]. This day care center would be for 57 children - 16 infants, 21 toddlers and 20 preschool children. The Priory plans to operate the center northwest of the Priory in an existing maintenance building. There are existing driveways from Century and y y Larpenteur Avenues to the building. The Priory plans to add nine new parking stalls and a fenced, outdoor playground. The letter on page 6 describes the day care center in more detail. DISCUSSION The proposed day care center meets the standards for approval required by code. RECOMMENDATION Adapt the resolution on page 8 which allows a day care center at 2 675 East Larpenteur Avenue. Approval is based on the standards required by code and is subject to the followin g conditions: 10 All construction shall follow the site plan, date- stamped July i 1991, except that the Priory shall increase the parking stall widths to 9.5 feet to meet City Code. The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may a rove minor changes. pp 2. The City Council shall review this permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in the City code. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Acreage. 34.16 acres (according to the county section maps) Existing land use: St..Paul's Priory SURROUNDING LAND USES The only adjacent development is Hill- Murray High School and their athletic fields, PLANNING Land use plan designation: S (school) and RH (high density residential) Zoning: R -3 residence district (multiple dwelling) City Code gives nine standards for approving, amending or denying a CUP. I have listed these standards in the resolution on page 8. Section 3 6 -2 2 (b) (1) of City Code requires that low turn -over customer parking stalls be at least 9.5 feet wide. jl\priory.mem (section 13 -29) Attachments 10 Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Letter dated June 27, 1991 5 Resolution 2 n • e^, r r'1 A 1 x W Cr Cr U LA RIE RD 0 Z )c / ANTELOPE WAY U 2 AMBERJACK . L A 3 0 Z N 25 Z 5 CODGER LA F- z x U �- C o , Zt City Ho!l rte, Tom/ S NORTH SA /N T PA UL 1 )oR'�O SE J 29 HOLLOWAY AV -� p�F O — — > u' Q`ap Cr Cr Y c c r 3G odr rti .h N W V) Z Co r - � tom: ii v7 > � , a 1 21 ° \N � Pk 7 } d i K G LL RIPLEY `:) AV RIPLEY AV GIRCILf KINGSTON AV H � z T. 3 z e a T PRICE AV I ° x z Y w _ _ ;t r V. /(, /C; H l / Al LA n • e^, r r'1 A 1 A A r E F f LOCATION MAP 7 0 E6 T29N, R22W ' 4 1 1 3 25124 0 1440N. Q N 3 Attachment 1 Z )c / ANTELOPE WAY U 2 AMBERJACK . L A 3 BEAVERDAL E RD 8 4 BOBCAT LA 5 CODGER LA F- z x U A A r E F f LOCATION MAP 7 0 E6 T29N, R22W ' 4 1 1 3 25124 0 1440N. Q N 3 Attachment 1 LEY c or i � � Www1wi-■-f#■■■■■■ai■■■■ � L�P ' ROPOSED PARKING j R 3 '9 i A60- L3 ..,. PROPOSED PLAY AREA ' 1, HILL/MURRAY, P AUL ' S PRIORY H1� HSCHC��L� o . • ono . Z D icx R3 LM .J 1 'i7f w gyp, Mme..• ''• , � T r I V t w R E l 1 T C I l A - w w.��- . , �R w �� - ............ 14.m PROPERTY LINE / ZONING. MAP Attachment 2 4 N PROPOSED NEW PARKING PROPOSED t A . ��LT PLAYGROUND wive <,� (New] C) �6l UAL Aoe 1� O ' � : 0 �y s•? t�' � SITE PLAN 4 N 5 Attachment 3 s� PAUL•s p�io�v 2675 Q L- .ARpQNtI E UR AVQ . St: VAU L, MN s5tug 612.777• $181 June 27, 1991 Thomas Ekstrand Associate Planner Office of Community Development 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Ekstrand, Enclosed is a site plan and a plan showing the new customer parking area north of the existing building and the playground area east of the same building.. Parking area for the staff is already in place west of the building. The road marked "Drive" north of the building is a dead end road. The site plan shows the fourty acre tract of land owned exclusively by St Paul's Priory. The Priory also owns about 27 acres east of Century Avenue, and approximately 43 acres south of Larpenteur Avenue. The 170 feet west of the daycare building is Priory property. The remaining portion (40 acres) all the way to Sterling is co- owned by the Priory (59%) and the Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis (4l%). Hence the Archdiocese would be the only property owner within 350 feet. No one lives on the co -owned property. During the past year we have done feasibility studies and have consulted and /or visited at least 25 Child Care Centers in our area in.Ramsey and Washington Counties. All indicated that there is a great need for quality care especially for infants since only 11 of the 22 centers in areas Five and Six of Ramsey County serve the infant population. In Washington County there is a rapidly growing need for child care. Of the three Washington County Centers listed on our information from the Department of Human Services, only one serves infants. Current studies predict that the need for Child Care, especially in Washington County will increase dramatically in the next decade. As a religious. Community we are committed to providing care for the poor and other children "at risk" in our area. We hope to offer care at reduced rates to 10 of the children when our financial picture allows that. We are currently writing grant proposals to that end. During the past year we have worked closely with Peg Wangensteen, Director of the St. Paul Churches Concerned for Children and have been in contact with the Department of Human.Services and other organ - izations, as well as Maplewood Officials; Fire Marshal, Health Department and the Building Inspector. JUN 2 7 = 6 Attachment 4 So, at this point, I feel we have addressed most of,the requirements prior to establishing.a Child Care Center. I'am sorry that the new use permit request was overlook. I am willing to' attend a Planning commission meeting to answer any questions the membership may have about our proposed Center which will give care to infants, toddlers and preschool. WE have submitted an application to the State of Minnesota to be licensed for 16 infants, 21 toddlers and 20 preschool children. We have adequate space to increase that number in the future . We do not foresee a traffic problem on Century as children will arrive and leave at various times between 6:30 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. Mondays through Fridays. I hope that you can expedite the approval of the conditional use application. I apologize for any inconvenience this late request may cause. Thank you for your help in this effort. We hope to open September 3, 1991, and are proceeding with all other contacts and work as you suggested. Sincerely, Sister M. Duane Moes, OSB Acting Director 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, St. Paul's Priory applied for a conditional use permit to operate a day care center. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2675 E. Larpenteur Avenue. The legal description is: PART OF S 1/2 OF SE 1/4 ELY OF FOL DESC OF SEC 13 TH W ON S LINE OF SD SEC 985 FT TH FT TH CURVE LEFT RAD 100 FT FOR 157.08 FT TO RA TO TAN POINT 450 FT TH LEFT AT RA 200 FT TO THE N LINE OF SD S 1/2 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO SEC 13 TN 29 RN 22 LINE; COM AT SE COR R 78 DEG 40 MIN 620 POINT OF TAN TH R AT rH R AT RA 225 FT MOL HWYS RDS & ESMTS) IN WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on July 15, 1991. They recommended that the City Council said permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on 19910 City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 16 The use would located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 29 The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 8 Attachment 5 59 The use would .g. e onl minimal vehicular traffic on local streets.and would not- create traffic con or unsafe access on existin or proposed streets. 6* The use would be s erved b ade public facilities and services, includin streets,, police and fire protection,. draina water and sewer s schools and parks. 7o The use would. not create . excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 89 The use would maximize the preservation of and in the site's natural and scenic features into the development desi 910 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects* Approval is subject to the followin conditions: .10 All construction shall follow the site plan,, date- stamped Jul 1, 1991, except that the P shall increase the customer's parkin stall widths to 9.5 feet to meet Cit Code. The Cit Council ma approve major chan after a pu hearin and recommendation on from the Communit Desi Review Board., The Director of Communit Development ma appro minor chan 2* The Cit Council shall review this permit one y ear from the date of approval, based on the procedures in Cit code, Adopted 19910 i Planning Commission Minutes 7 -15 -91 6. NEW BUSINESS -2- a. Conditional Use Permit: 2675 Larpenteur Avenue (Priory) Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Sister Rolaine Diethelm and Sister Sharon were present representing the Priory. In response to a question from Commissioner Gerke, Sister Rolaine said they are planning construction of a fence on the interior of the wall on the north side of the site, Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution allowing a day care center at 2675 arpenteur Avenue. Approval is based on the standards required by code and is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan, date- stamped July 1, 1991, except that the Priory shall increase the parking stall widths to 9.5 feet to meet City code. The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The City Council shall review this permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in the City code. Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The motion passed. b. Conditional Use Permit: Beam Aven & Kennard Street (County Library)- Ken Roberts, Asso iate Plann presented the staff report for this requested con itional se permit to build a library. Dave Nicolai, const uct' n manager and owners representative for the library board, s the drainage would not 'be changed with this construction, n would the wetlands be encroached upon. Mr. Nicolai answere estions from the Commission regarding the proposed site pla paring, and driveway easements. Nor. Nicolai said if easement were n t obtained for this driveway, there would still be ough spa a to redesign the site plan allowing adequate parking to meet code. INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit .(CUP) for Finalube requires that the City Council review the permit one year after they approve it. The Council approved the permit on August 27, 1990, subject to the: conditions listed in the recommendation on page 2. Staff is presenting it now because of the following request. Mr. Zimmerman, the neighbor to the north, is. asking that the City Council revise Finals site plan to allow his driveway to stay. It cuts across Finals northwest lot corner. (Refer to the site plan on page 6 and Mr. Zimmerman's letter.on page 8.) Fina did not,show this driveway on the site plan the City Council approved. The conditional use permit requires that the City Council approve any major changes to the site plan. Fina does not object to this driveway. BACKGROUND The standards required by Code for a conditional use permit are in the resolution on page 9. Fina gave the City a revised site plan for construction on October 15, 1990 that shows the required driveway to County Road B. This plan also has a note that Fina proposed to remove the existing Zimmerman driveway opening and install a new curb and walk. (See the site plan on pages 6 and 7.) DISCUSSION The following comments apply to three of the conditional use permit conditions: Above - around Storage Tank The old condition 6 required an above- ground oil storage tank. This was illegal when.F"na built their lube building, so they installed an underground tank. Since then, the law has changed to allow above - ground tanks. Actlon hr C6ur, 11: Nodift ect,.,., „... MEMORANDUM R e j eoted TO. City Manager Dat M MtMylra�- FROM: Thomas Ekstrand,.Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditiona Use Permit Renewal /Revision LOCATION: 2180 White Bear Avenue APPLICANT: Fina Oil and Chemical Company and Stan Zimmerman of 2200 White Bear Avenue OWNER: Fina Oil and Chemical Company PROJECT TITLE: Finalube DATE: July 3, 1991 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit .(CUP) for Finalube requires that the City Council review the permit one year after they approve it. The Council approved the permit on August 27, 1990, subject to the: conditions listed in the recommendation on page 2. Staff is presenting it now because of the following request. Mr. Zimmerman, the neighbor to the north, is. asking that the City Council revise Finals site plan to allow his driveway to stay. It cuts across Finals northwest lot corner. (Refer to the site plan on page 6 and Mr. Zimmerman's letter.on page 8.) Fina did not,show this driveway on the site plan the City Council approved. The conditional use permit requires that the City Council approve any major changes to the site plan. Fina does not object to this driveway. BACKGROUND The standards required by Code for a conditional use permit are in the resolution on page 9. Fina gave the City a revised site plan for construction on October 15, 1990 that shows the required driveway to County Road B. This plan also has a note that Fina proposed to remove the existing Zimmerman driveway opening and install a new curb and walk. (See the site plan on pages 6 and 7.) DISCUSSION The following comments apply to three of the conditional use permit conditions: Above - around Storage Tank The old condition 6 required an above- ground oil storage tank. This was illegal when.F"na built their lube building, so they installed an underground tank. Since then, the law has changed to allow above - ground tanks. Driveway to County_ Road B Condition one requires a driveway along the east side of the buildings to County Road B. The City Engineer asked Fina to delay construction of this driveway until the City installs a sanitary sewer. The City plans to build this sewer this summer. The City has a cash escrow to assure that Fina will build this driveway, Zimm Driveway I cannot see a strong public purpose for requiring that Fina remove the driveway now. Removing the driveway would not substantially improve Fina's appearance since the landscaping is already in. Mr. Zimmerman's lot is for sale so the driveway encroachment may be a temporary situation. The City should have assurance that the property owner will construct the curb, sidewalk and landscaping in the future. The City should require that if Fina wants to let the driveway stay, they should provide the City with a letter of credit or cash escrow to guarantee that the improvements will be done in the future. The Council could monitor this during the periodic reviews of the conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Renew the conditional use permit for a lube center at 2180 White Bear Avenue for one year and adopt the resolution on page 9. Approval is based on the standards required by code and subject to the following conditions: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) 1. All construction must be in accordance with the site plan given to the City n October 15 1990 � AA - a dm a �^� Y • ._.� e The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes. The property owner may Leave the drivewav over the northwest corner of the` to until the Rroperty at . 2200 White Bear„ Avenue redev lops . The Property owners shall then »rovide landscap, ng, curbing and a sidewalk as shown on the October 15, 199 site plan.. 7If _Fina does not construct these im rovements by October 1 1991 the shall urovide a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit for 150% of the estimated cost of the improvementsle - A letter of credit must be valid until the work is done. The prooerty owner shall-also provide the City with a right -of- entry acxreement, in case the ,City must do this work. 2 2 -. The hours of operation shall be between 7 :00 a.m. and 8 :00 p..m. 34. There shall be no outside material storage. permitted. All trash kept outside must be stored within the trash enclosure. 4S-r Compliance with the City's motor fuel station ordinance. r - 5 -7. The boulevard irrigation system shall only be operated between 10 :00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. te\finalube.mem (section 11) Attachments 1: Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4 Enlargement of October 15, 1990 site plan 50 Mr. Zimmerman's letter dated April 19, 1991 6. Resolution K 'ANT dwm . NO a 0 0 W 0 N i zd- 4 LD v 4 � LAKE W3 Q 68 i c 2 j PRlV r£ srR£Er (AeTSSAS/ AVM NOR rH SA IN T PA UL AV G — - I A N Q Y W Q u > 8 � � Z 1 Tap'` `1 �I I NOR TH SA IN T PA UL LOCATION MAP Q 4 N Attachment 1 AV • V • LARK _ WW .10 F-V 2 y o o d • 42 •.� aw ALIV .+ 2 3�� p p 9 emwmwo ro rz) *a 0 13 1 N — 1.4 14 ( %J 04 low o F41�Z z LAURIE 17 . 1� t _ _ r ' _42 C; f 4 t 3 a 1 3 (3 • � ° 0 � 'Q 4 s. , W , -- t 02 r 22 00 135 M ° �° W V% + L t g `' 34• 2 oft dw .• ;;;:::::::.f ::: :::• ::::•::. S , A t W LUKE CENTER ') ON z ad al 0 3 j 2 GAS STATION _ _• _ P4 7 + & CAR WASH — — — —,,�' Q ACT N in (44 46 wv 21 (4") st .4 /at ;.; . t ' _ • 1 _.. — ....COUNTY RD B ROAD — z �. 1 +6 . 1800 Ful k Manufacturing •. lb e 6 bo o 10 o ` Hos teS S Thrift Store on - ri) 10 J30 Y .1a � y . i1 N to N N ' ��. • lG;c. Jv • PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N 5 Attachment 2 1. ' N,,44 be S Ztommey-m I L d p L owe b 41-1 IT4' -<� '� ' rlrW Wnv ►� � t s r 4 v _ - HW b'T L p W FL Nw "Kb ;, - cr . SIP AL:IC.I= Z n SITE PLAN OCTOBER 15 1990 6 Attachment 3 4 N p W FL SIP AL:IC.I= rpyL. M , ' i � 6C sT 1D KZMAJi4 i�x18T1 NG GArZ "AS E�c15T m KEHA! 4 �MdvE � mow. Cu Rb \, N E." 61 r 3 Z I x �U 1 satzw FST M 1 ' Z - ! Try � i rn GXIST! IJG 5O x 50 � � 1 1 ! F r TO I RKIVE Te�P�►.IE -uP FAY �OI.D 1L i I 1 1 SITE PLAN OCTOBER 15 1990 6 Attachment 3 4 N V 10 :z NEW 60j�-� N L" '. 00 -1.574 N 11111111111100 10 .� . )&L 146 C� llb 24 - o 6p - 4m 40 - \j • ul � exisTiti 0 Fq Ll% Im -I E= SIPE A... �-- - = YL, �?LU r . Nil* 00 4 V\ ENLARGEMENT OF OCTOBER 15, 1990 SITE PLAN 7 Attachment 4 2200 white Bear Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 April 19,1991 Community Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 E. Co Rd B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Sirs: I am writing regarding the Fina, Oil Company construction project on the corner of White Bear Avenue and Co Rd B. As the adjacent property owner to the North of P P Y Fina Oil, I have a concern about the curbing originally approved for the completion Y P P of the Fina project. During the past twenty four years I have maintained a driveway on the southern boundary of my property. It has been solidly graded and well maintained with Class 5 gravel. Part of the width of this driveway is on the Fina P arcel of land. Arrangements were made during the construction phase for Fina to use this driveway for access to their site for equipment and material deliveries. As shown on the Conditional Use Application filed by Fina, the completion of the project requires landscaping and curbing on the northern boundary of their property. The landscaping will not pose any problems; however, the installation of curbing as shown will limit access and egress from m driveway. M property is Y Y YP P Y currently for sale and future use is unknown. I feel it is burdensome for me after 24 years of use and maintenance to incur the expense of moving the driveway to the North. A drive- through driveway is an absolute necessity for safe access onto white Bear Avenue. A single driveway would encourage backing across traffic to head South on white Bear Avenue. If the curbing were to be installed, access to my property from this driveway would be impossible when travelling from the South to the North on White Bear Avenue. Ramsey County and the Fina Oil Company Project Engineer, Don Marrow are both agreeable to leaving the driveway as it is without the installation of curbing at this time. No permits would be required from Ramsey County. I would appreciate your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Stanley J. Zimmerman cc.: Don Marrow 8 Attachrnent 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Fina Oil nd Chemical Company appli l ed for a conditional use permit to operate a public garage on property zoned BC (business commercial) WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2180 White Bear Avenue. The legal description is: Lots 1 and 2, Block 29, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 19 The City Council granted a conditional use permit for . this use on August 27, 1990. 2. The Community Design Review.Board discussed this permit revision on July 9, 1991. They recommended that the City Council ai l d permit. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on 1991. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Community Design Review Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 10 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 39 The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 9 Attachment 6 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate. public facilities and services, -including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 79 The use would not create excessive additional costs for .public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 10 All construction must be in accordance with the site plan given to the City on October 15, 19900 The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes. The property owner may leave the driveway over the northwest corner of the site until the property at 2200 White Bear Avenue redevelops. The property owner shall then provide landscaping, curbing and a sidewalk as shown on the October 15, 1990 site plan. If Fina does not construct these improvements by October 1, 1991, they shall provide a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit for 150% of the estimated cost of the improvements. A letter of credit must be valid until the work is done. The property owner shall also provide the City with a right -of -entry agreement, in case the City must do this work.' 2. The hours of operation shall be between 7:00 a.m. and 8 :00 p.m. 3. There shall be no outside material storage permitted. All trash kept outside must be stored within the trash enclosure. 49 Compliance with the City's motor fuel station ordinance. 5. The boulevard irrigation system shall only be operated between 10 :00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Adopted , 199 10 Community Design Review Board -4- 7-9 -91 Minutes c. Site Plan Revision - Finalube 2180 White Bear Avenue Stan Zimmerman of 220.0 White Bear Avenue asked the Review Board to revise the site plan for Finalube to - allow "his drivewa Y, which cuts across Fina's northwest,lot corner, to remain. Mr. Zimmerman said Fina does not object to the driveway. .Boardmember Thompson moved renewal of the condition use ' t'' permi for a Tube center at 2180 White Bear Avenue for one Y ear and adopt the resolution. Approval is based on the standards required by code and subject to the follow' • 7 ing conditions. 1. All construction must be in accordance with t ' he site plan given to the City on October 15, 19900 The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes The Cit Y Council may approve major.changes. The propert owner m Y leave the driveway over the northwest corner of thews' ite until the property at 2200 White Bear Avenue redevelops The pro . ert owner shall then p property en provide landscaping, curbing and a sidewalk as shown on the October 15, 1990, site p tan If Fina does not construct these improvements by October 1 1991, they shall provide a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit for 150% of the estimated cost of the improvements. A letter of credit must be valid until the work is done. The property owner shall also rovide the he City with.a right -of -entry agreement, in case the City must do this work. 20 The hours of operation shall be between 7 :00 a.m. .... and 8.00 p.m. 3. There, shall be no outside material storage p ermitted. All trash kept outside must be stored within the trash enclosure. 40 Compliance with the City's motor fuel station ordinance, 5. The boulevard irrigation system shall only be operated between 1b:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Boardmember Wasiluk seconded Ayes- -Moe,. Erickson Robinson, Thompson, Wasiluk d. Sign Plan Review Knowl 's 2720 Stillwater lwater.Road Vern Thraen, repres n eo ng Knowlan's, said they are requesting q g approval to place a. r -foot by eight -foot reader board which is presently a por sign on wheels, on the building facing g Century Avenue, Bard dis cussed the existing signs on the G - 3 Action bi; Council* modif I o ` .r..�......,. MEMORANDUM s TO: City Manager Dot ..-.... -- FROM Director of Community Development* SUBJECT: Code Change: Single and Double Dwellings DATE: July 2 1991 INTRODUCTION The City Council and Planning Commission requested that staff investigate several issues about the location of single and double.dwelling homes on a lot. These included: 10 Home orientation with the front of the house not facing the street 2. Homes set further back than the adjacent homes. 3. Too much lot coverage and house size. BACKGROUND The City does not regulate home orientation, maximum setbacks or maximum house sizes. The City does limit the lot area that accessory buildings can cover, such as garages and sheds. The City also regulates minimum setbacks. The minimum front yard setback is 30 feet or whatever the predominant setback in the neighborhood is. The minimum side yard setback is at least ten feet on a habitable side and five feet on a nonhabitable side. The City also requires a rear yard setback of at least 20 percent of the lot depth. DISCUSSION We receive about two or three complaints a year on the placement or size of dwellings, similar to the examples in the introduction above. These complaints fall into three categories -home orientation on the lot, setbacks and lot coverage. Home orientation on the lot 96% of the new homes built in the last year faced the street. There have been a few problems though. The Council brought up the problem of a house not facing the street because of the home at 3069 Bellaire Avenue. (See the plan on page 8 There are some unique building restrictions on this lot that prevented the usual home placement on it -- the powerl-ine easement and the City's pipeline setback requirement. Another example is the house at 1860 Sterling Street., owned by Mrs. Welch. This house faces the side lot line. (See the maps on pages 9 and 10.) The builder thought a future street would be constructed in front of the house from Sterling Street. The street plans did not work out. The neighbors to the south, on the north side of Knoll Circle, have complained that the house intrudes on their privacy. Staff surveyed nineteen other suburbs about their site - location requirements for single - dwellings. only three of the nineteen cities require a house to face the street. Requiring that the house be parallel to the street may cause some problems. Some of the Councilmembers thought this was a problem when they saw the group home at 1362 Cope Avenue. This building would not fit on the lot if it was parallel to the street because of the lot's unusual shape. The house was slightly rotated to fit on the lot: (See the plan on page 15.) Builders of homes on corner lots may also have a problem. Homes on these lots have sometimes been placed at an angle to.both - streets. (Refer to the plan on page 18 as an example.) Another difficult situation is when the home -is not rectangular or when a person wishes to set the garage at an angle to. the rest of the house. The map on page 19 shows examples of this. The City could not allow such site designs if builders had to place homes parallel to the street. Since these homes have not caused any complaints, we have not included a requirement for a house to be parallel.to a street. The attached ordinances require that the front of dwellings face the street, unless there is not an apparent front side. These ordinances also a house to rotate up to 30 degrees from the street line. Staff could approve a different orientation if any of several conditions are met. Homes set back further than the homes The City's front yard setback requirement is a minimum. A builder can construct a house further back if it does not go into the rear yard setback. We occasionally get a complaint that the house set further back detracts from the privacy of adjacent homes. The houses at 2616 Clarence Street and 882 Conner Court are examples of this. (See the maps on pages 11 - 12.) The attached ordinance (starting page 20) requires that all homes be set back at least 30 feet, but not more than 35 feet, from the front property line. 81% of the homes built in the last year have a setback between 30 and 35 feet. Staff could approve a greater setback if any of several conditions are met. I have included the usual appeal procedures to the Design Review Board and Council. Too much lot coverage and house size The City regulates the minimum size of homes in the City. The City does not directly regulate the maximum size of homes. A person may build as large of a home as they wish if they meet all setbacks. A way to control the maximum size of homes is to have 2 a maximum lot coverage requirement. Setting a standard for a reasonable maximum lot coverage is difficult. A Staff survey of.nineteen other cities showed that only four have a maximum lot coverage. Those cities use a maximum lot coverage for single dwellings of 30 to 35 percent. The group homes at 1362 Cope Avenue and 1685 Howard Street are the only complaints about this problem that I know of (See the maps on pages 14 through 1.7.) These buildings have about 4,050 square feet. of building coverage. The lot at 1362 Cope Avenue is the smallest lot of the five that the developers built these group homes on. It has.about 13,495 square feet. The 4050- square -foot building covers 30 percent of this lot. This is shown on the site plan on page 15. The group homes would meet the lot coverage requirements used in other cities. Limiting the house size would limit its value. The City should encourage and not discourage higher value homes in a neighborhood. For these reasons, Staff is not recommending that the City adopt a maximum lot coverage standard. RECOMMENDATIONS Adopt the ordinance on page 20. Staff and the Planning Commission developed this ordinance. It does the following: i. It would require builders to build these structures with: 1 j A 30 - 35 foot front yard setback or at the predominant front yard setback on that street. Staff could allow a greater setback if any of several conditions are met. (2 ) The front of the dwelling facing the street. The home could be rotated up to 30 degrees from the front lot line without staff approval. Staff could allow a further rotation if any of several conditions are met. Corner lots are excluded. 2. It would allow Staff to send any house plan to the Community Design Review Board if there is a question about meeting the ordinance. It also would. allow anyone to appeal Staff Is decision to the Board and eventually to the Council. go /memo25.mem Attachments 1. Location 2. Location 3. Property 4* Site Map 5. Property (5.1) Map Map Line /Zoning Map (3069 Bellaire Avenue) Line /Zoning Map (1860 Sterling Street) 3 6. Site Plan (1860 Sterling Street) 7. Property Line /Zoning Map 8. Site Map (.2616 Clarence Street) 9. Property Line /Zoning Map (882 Conner Court) 100 Property Line /Zoning Map (1362 Cope Avenue) 11. Site Map (1362 Cope Avenue) 120 Property Line /Zoning - Map 13. Site Map (1685 Howard Street) 14. Site Map (1113 South Lakewood Drive) 15. Site Map (1100 1190 Frank Court) 16. Ordinance (staff recommendation) 4 i 1 i WHITE BE ER LAKE Q IZ 68 t 1 spsN•000 CMV& .. �..� 3069 BELLAIRE. AVENUE oO N. VALL AN wQ 00 YN01 AV M r C T 19 AK PUP~ R J . o .. r MA KE UX� N. lilt 1 r% At 0 Av ��t'fSAS/ AVI NORTH SAINT PAUL 0 u pit RO i \GA ' / o NORTH SAINT PAUL 1685 HOWARD STREET 2160 N. AV I 1 i ❑ 1 920 N. �- - 1860 STERLING STREET 6 , V u 30 AV W 1680 N. AV NOW, rwr ON OWNYIEW D* � �pp LOCATION MAP 4 N 5 Attachment 1 I<� UX.X ST ST. � 84 z W W BEAM AV e a �'� "3;,ARK Q . .22 MA Koh /mon Lake Certinb� >; ` � FVAID KOHLMAJ AV Mom g V Hazt 1wood CO R0 "C" J W KaAbr►o* P* � W J 2616 CLARENCE STREET a w BONN R ON R � J �� Mawd ,CT DOE- N � AV J o� (�I CONNOR �y � OEMONT AV 8R o ` N 5 sci � C1 60 � � PQ �� 0 TA AN AY i s# P << F, Q (2 GERVAI$ AV PKWY � t3RANW IEyY AV z VIKINQ pR Y u) c�E cr oPE Knuckle Head Loks Keller Lake 1362 COPE AVENUE '\W co � RD M Y LAURIE LELANO ZS � RD � SAND- HURST tt woOd� BURKE CT Q �� ST Z 7qe W Y <E A✓ W Pk � P� (i o rc BURKE AN o � AM RbbJnAcod �Ij CHAMBERS ST N �e a aD Ah � f � FLORID(; AV ac 60 AV N SK 4d LAW LOCATION MAP AV r SKILLMAN AV = Q- AEG � � " RR� . L L AV Q� 4 N 6 Attachment 2 T YYNSHIP 29 �3 0 � (72) (T/) (�� $( N �6 9 � P L �� , et (!0 8 j 60 , c a �s 6 A 5� 4 �, 3 � o - ° 5 73-50 fs 14 17 ^ -g4 4 16 �� ! 14.54 GALL. AVE* p 9 4 o F o g 4 y 18 lot OZ . . '40 10 (8g) F 9 9 3 �(� ",r ,- _':•.' �3) +� Re 'Ar is 1 11 1 Z c :: .......... IP 13 14 15 13 ... ; E S M T. :ter ' =f:� _.. �, _;:_:..fit. • ....:..:..: ::N:«' =;;;::::• TIE RN STATES Pov,t LR CO EA .... P E L E _ E _S T1�: .... G ::r�!� :::iii{ �i+i+i ::•.... _ - Eiiiii .: ... ::: .............. ..................:.:::::::. r $ ..... 306 I ..... � Y DL � N 87. r 3 0 :: :......:::::::::::::::::::: I Biro A I 16 -44 _ 4 . 1 8 9 M so C) (G) f�) _ �o� - ,�� (1 Z-) 3 ) Ce? ' 9J � � ' � o - �5} ((*7) 3RENNER AVE s EAST' BRE NNER s � , AVt �� >> 1 • LG ice`.. `d '2�•tt �? � ,e• Z e2 •s ,. o ` , 3 2 (t7� 2 21 rr6c) 3 c o fo o� a• 13 4- 3 C2�) � ♦a 4z . (�) �� - � 0 3 3 6 �+ �,� N = 5 i 2 C •'' 1 oz 4 i 130 ' � �' ZG �, � � � � 4 s� ss , C �� 3s Cam) o , 14 9 %o e F- ;o S W M 2 7 11 P . J8t cc I- (9 J10 .0 Q it a� (5'0 � � '�24 13S (3v� � < Z7) > 3� d 2 � ..� � Z tio� 9 0,,• m ` �2 d +; 31 . p� 10 A1 . ' . 40-C °ok'` �' r ^ ♦ '1' '� 40.0 ' ` p . m �' ( 1 3) "" '� '4 :2 �-- 3 Z' J. ) f • S � t) C4�} I . I ris) o 4 7 4 29 30 �o E,� 3 y $ 8 Q c �,� �� U � _ t t) C12) ' 2 •� �r �iao.or f Olt- 56 43 z VMIA Cp 175 ` � E . � 33 674 84 0 . � PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3069 BELLAIRE AVENUE Q N 7 Attachment 3 SITE MAP 3069 BfLLAIRE Q N Attachment 4 EGSEMENT . — ' —�- 1 ✓ .• �Z O L� LEGAL DESC :'•� (�' a �„ LOT 20, BLOCK RAMSEY COUNT' J• 1 Lit •� — � - _ - ` . .. -- ' 1- ` D,Pd /NAGE UT /! /T/' EASEMENT _ .. P /PFL /NE.�'� M - i ' + - w '• • - CEN�EPL /NE Cf{ �ONOCO O/L CO. '� ; '!'` • '. �_ EoSfNENT OSPE>p(". M / 99S10 /J L S B9 S f ' 3Z "Gr 3L /. 4t! ,ti 50 N r• - ' "E 33 /. 6 Z ' - S P ES E,kEN T M 7- ' rr Q y e "T _ -�� _ ` I -"' + }• _ ` _ 7 ° •a�llL'IllllT/I/l717?7Z7' _ �� n 'to k •--- ------ icLt. a 0,54. I . w.a /D /7.Gj DE�IOT- ' r ' a �; ,I . — �--�. • -r ! ([olZ.s� /D/�� DENOT INDICA l _ , -- — — — -- — — — — � M so' I °0 i /O /8• E ; _ FiN1SiiF (I ° 366.6/ - - - _ >,4; s aa•s�so ~E'` Co ut- X0/8.8 = BASEV cc 16 Lr W _ Co SITE MAP 3069 BfLLAIRE Q N Attachment 4 g • 2C G. k G C W r . V • z N r 7S , 75^ 5O 2 (7) Z. 50 ,Z 40 7 `G . U- v c '► --� C u - v g C _24) (4) 7 o 04-0 v' •s o � 2.3 2 etc . d 0 3 F r ' T + 31 ? , • G W 2 (11) Proposed P Variance 10 3 �� s� , o --� e 5 ' 9 7 51 - (( g) } , • 72 Proposed Lot Split L ',�:, �s 4 �� tG ) p ones • �� • 3 - 2 ,,► �,( 1 /MEADO •. .. t� " 7t lit °o 21)"� p� .� ry _ r .� b Q �'f. r ,,o ,� �i9) X 2 2 4 2 .� MA P' so , w 1 0 6 75 �2aje D - 22 at. 1848 2 1 . ss - ,, L • 7 Q KNOLL • CZ 7) (2- to) 9 c r R c O 1. � ao ODD s R IPLEY v � (.�s) 9� ��.� 14o.3Z o C33) s 6 C • ' 4 ( 4 1) `� )� 0 3eo 8 o v C 4t 10 n F K N L L 2 3 ( �6 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 1860 Sterling.Street -- 9 Attachment 5 • o v W lip W > h � O } - o Z� C .,Of (7 •• N Z w a % ... it J Cr. W Proposed Lot Split Lines 0 6 cum r r 7 s O F O • C r O W SITE PLAN 18G0 Sterling Street 10 Attachment 6 J Proposed Variance Nor f A 1 1 n� of ie ul A dOZ t o of of W 1/4 of . OE I/ 4 on t ye . 22 N 8 e'41' 24' E 363.09 LID T 5.4.0 3 7 (39) a Cam) Z o 19 18.43 a- e . 05 ) 1 ' y4 '% r O� ..O 4 N 11 Attachment 7 • �.. IB '73 2 6 31.5 R en r , —Y—R � • 104' •79 AC. 1S 75 �� q 33 33 - ' ►2S' w ( , - ti6.7S .SO Lf(.' • 50sit. O O• - . •87a r►7 r"% L.,o 39 _ ♦ p �.$lo If1 3 o . 3 ►�, ^ fi Q •a � 16 4.5 sc fig) r •�°'�' • 18 3' R+ p 040 36 30 020 M .23 ac. S 26 15M % O n o mi •;iii;:; :;:•::;: ... ::� �'�' 2609 � r r 36 ` r 41 _ •1 G. 440 �� a•) C, � � 2604 � o o (8) 88 _ b ° p .99 ac . c z o 3b 9) .37 ac - 4St) (35) ao c• ( .53 ♦C . 0 9 0 _ . 374c. 30) (3 G) m . - p 0 1.8? do . (lo) 310 a goo �• Cam'" o W ' m W LID T 5.4.0 3 7 (39) a Cam) Z o 19 18.43 a- e . 05 ) 1 ' y4 '% r O� ..O 4 N 11 Attachment 7 tY LM 3 l �\ I z V w (,Zb °z 10014 a -� 00 fl - � n c SITE MAP 2616 CLARENCE STREET W.4 Q N 12 Attachment 8 i . 3 6 19 5,4 4 3 t,,...t� Q.c.� 000.3 g 3. 5 M 9 9 026 1 .( c r .Z. 1 � ' 10 3 7) 4 a S k . 5� o a � . b 4 N 7 CD fb 3.75 its) 4.a� Z . . i 4 �•°p • . _ • "' ) o ( 25) D o 9 , 4 3 co V � Z 5 PA LM COUA . , 10 3. 9 .2'1 �O � 9 ) �� , r � � � °► 2. .00 8 � ( (2.t) W. Of (20) 3 Co 9 pP L ty Co 7 Z- r 9 n ` 37 9 gip' `r �) q . - -QD r 39 a 13 r : ` . 9 �, , ,„ 14 N . � 90 **,% 1 O 1 „ 1 � 1 (3 2 0 Ls) 0 9r tom„ 5. S o 15 ,, o (30) t o o �a arc 873 a 9 84.3 pr 4 , $7 f '. C 4 N N 4 ` ., o 0 84.4 ;9� 30 R <d (4,0) • . , �� v •sue (` o o 4 D8 _ 11 .A� o • 3 �` M 8 c+1 7c _ 3 Q � 1 "ft*,. + D (2-7) 1 = to M 2 — t o S� 0 T� '70 IF a �r _ . P .-. Q rso ,i t 9$ .y 7 89 c '1 0 0 ac . $ �3. or g� s c o n,`',4 o r^ 9 M 10 11 • r` 1.56 t J W � '.' �d� . rrr l09. ' /006 74 77 2.80 7 •:�3�t- j Z z •` �- 19 0. DEMONT� AVE _ 8'x,2 .9�oac. .4i -0 D / t09 .7S U.2S 4 — I �j 1!04 �� S tsJ (g� r� �� 1*• l $Z Z. kn l' Z� W O o W N 2 �, �' N zt .�s a 912 "- w 91 �1 52-15. $1 J59.o2 0.84 r�9 100 Jo �1•) t4 9<0.0� , FW .3 (0a r- I I L 0 3) �� O 50 ' • 51 ( 04 0 3� • 9 �► ec . �S) 45[.7 � O� ' 39 417 • 9.6 ac � 11 .03-w. O r' 10 — V $� 4 q 100 Q 9 BROOK-5 U /00 79.5 .75. Cj � Q , 03) ( 41) .: 2 3 + 22 21 fn )o I o , 3 A5. z 0 30` 38� 10.00 11.47ac.) 3 P ..._ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N 13 Attachment 9 '.1J vi • 'Ln H IGHWAY 36 3.22 ac. , f 2.39 ac. 1.25ae. � 1 Ott 1 _ w 1 V CORNER KICK SOCCER ?5 � 82 :° 240' _ 3S * . .. 75 4es ' •i 7l (49) (30) . - 2 3 41 4 S• 76 C w -- - 1352 cc .. 4 4 . 0 IS l7/,p4„ (3 0 ^ 0 is 19 20 '� t� �64) j ) �' 1 *A ' ii1 -3 4 30.( v V. R '' 0 :ad e . 7 Z 27 � 04 o a� (to 4p) ' W , 22 2 * s �. ) � 4 ( g (0 so, 7 4 9 0 *20 o � � � 5 Vo ,SC6 } P z + � ti I a,� 4 1 0 7O = uJ � xt O 54 3 N�Id L� Z1 5467 �". lot (57) 46 0 1 T 7/ Q t 4 3, b Z "t 4O 8, <) _ _ .14 �` Z 14 13 N 16 Ill Is IS 2c f 4� C Z 0 z :2 1 ct:. 4. 3 S ' .: , i� 14 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 1362 COPE AVENUE Q N 14 Attachment 10 F- w. w z ' `_ r Fo 'N 09 0 0 S3 , f 37• *33p) ' 2.50 ac. ��+ •� 8 a c 1610 • In e1 . l ot a .28 ac OHO (58} � .85ac, �� s3 .38 ac. h I i1 N (59) ss ,_ • 233.E �� ► t37' Ogg ?r 1 907 • • �r � i0 •• .. 0 . . ..r ■I *I+ w ,gel � Q N 14 Attachment 10 Is h / T LJ CA.. 4 •.. , 1 � 1 ..._ rte. 1• • I O CO A + , • 1~ 510E ' I N SITE MAP 1362 COPE AVENUE Q N 15 Attachment 11 a .J ','Q11 qtr • ',. ... , • t .. ...... » l ..._»__.. , ,_.� '` � L: ' r,. OR ; of w F+: IL �r NE 7 • C • 3 ., ��y4i•,, _ ;,.. • ( 1 i:a i n * ..r f t�a' �7�`?thsy ' • a. i ' � ..•► � +S! . . a ii ♦Y a ' • � ✓ '`� •♦ Syr+ L �'` � -�'� ' r:'t! + p �. 51 i1,!= y; C O Oyl'!4 /► It O?1AoO. I. f r h / T LJ CA.. 4 •.. , 1 � 1 ..._ rte. 1• • I O CO A + , • 1~ 510E ' I N SITE MAP 1362 COPE AVENUE Q N 15 Attachment 11 r 822.06 'E _ 100 0 Z t M Win. \ ExnT f A. .5 1 �+ J oe 4 �8 0 i c � l t 4S.W632 235.3 Z 82.GE -� r O (7) l i �.. 1702 = + Y 47s • i ter+ • � L :... � �] � y 1685 � • � :; � '�� ;; ti 9 ;?4 k as. •10b �� ... s Z 3333 -*7 LARPENTEUR AVENUE r. ST PALL PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 1685 HOWARD STREET Attachment 12 Q N CO. E S M T DOC,243 • NDS ■ 0 ■ L OD 1 . W R 1 3 2ND A D D • N _ 100 0 Z t M Win. \ ExnT f A. .5 1 �+ J oe 4 �8 0 i c � l t 4S.W632 235.3 Z 82.GE -� r O (7) l i �.. 1702 = + Y 47s • i ter+ • � L :... � �] � y 1685 � • � :; � '�� ;; ti 9 ;?4 k as. •10b �� ... s Z 3333 -*7 LARPENTEUR AVENUE r. ST PALL PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 1685 HOWARD STREET Attachment 12 Q N rd I f , 1 i I . O p f J A l 1 v t 022 ' O PL'opL•CT( l-p1° t7'• �� >.. . 121.00 e 1024 �P ' cc RPENTEUR AVE . � �� +r �_.�.. -- � _.._rte �� ... .... mow....•._. _.... .._.... _. SITE PLAN 1685 HOWARD STREET 17 Attachment 13 Pt ;] tEL ' IAr 33 .' f y •a�`y�.! ` T OWOOL& Llj 1 : i , s . 3 Q 0 I y `S • VV , v t 022 ' O PL'opL•CT( l-p1° t7'• �� >.. . 121.00 e 1024 �P ' cc RPENTEUR AVE . � �� +r �_.�.. -- � _.._rte �� ... .... mow....•._. _.... .._.... _. SITE PLAN 1685 HOWARD STREET 17 Attachment 13 REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North. 660 -3053 lood Hub Set Minneapolis, Minnesota 65428 .vation only Drainage .Surface g �htl`1� s Pro P osed .Elevation Type of Building -Full Basement ..s Existi-n-a Elevation (� JA It H E *, %--12 a CIS4.1 0 �.___ 4- N •O 00 0 z �•° Q _... Q ' tx • � ' 1 ir N , ,.-r • J 0 1 0 , Q �- � 0� 961 to 1 op r � E,o�,er � c�"�' '�S � • 4 -7 - – - _'_,_ 20 t. _ lee. -�j boot OC C �a 7 CV o Q C) U 3 u Y Q SITE MAP 1113 SOUTH LAKEWOOD DRIVE t — �g Attachment 14 4 N P F� . L 1 .r O I CJ 1194 FRANK CT. SITE PLAN 19 1100 FRANK CT. J Attachment 15 Q N FRANK STREET ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ABOUT THE FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS AND BUILDING LOCATIONS FOR SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLINGS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out) • Section 1. Section 25 - 65 is changed as follows: Sec..25 - 65. Approval of plans. (a) The Director of Community Development shall review all plans for single dwellings or minor construction. The City Council shall define minor construction by dollar valuations set by resolution from time to time. Before approving the plans, the Director must determine that the plans meet all City ordinances and policies, including the design standards in Se 25 70 ('b). The D irector may send any sincrle dwelling or minor construction to the Community Design Review Board. (b) Anyone may appeal the director's decision to the Community Design Review Board within fifteen (15) days after the director's decision. The Board's decision shall be f anal , unless someone appeals it to the City Council within fifteen (15) days after the Board's decision. (c) The Community Design Review Board shall review all other plans. The Board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to the City Council within fifteen (15) days after the Board's decision. However, no person shall revise a plan that the City Council originally approved without their approval. Section 2. Section 25 - 66 (1) of the Design Review Board Ordinance is changed as follows: To review all buildin �� a o i �- -i (1) g plans,, except :� -- � = dw , and .Aese proposals excluded from review under Section 25 - 65. Sign applications shall be reviewed as stated in Article III of Chapter 36, Section 3. Section 36 -70 in the R -1 Residence District le sin ( g family) is changed as follows: Sec. 36 - 70. Front yards. Each 3.84 1 % I - - " - ^^ ; -..e e dwelling shall have a front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet but not more than thirty-five w (3 5 ) feet %d=rT -h- Except that, if the majority of the dwellings on the same side of the same s treet and within three hundred and fifty 3 5 0 feet of the lot to be built on have a predominant front y- setback, r�-e '-'� m �aiz� �►.�c�..xs.#_._.t h.a 34 4.. t, ; =: k r - - n �,— then all • J A%A A6 w +i i v i. w ag w w&A%OLAa Vaa.ii. L+J % �� 20 dwelli o additions on that lot Mel n--th �- �-�� shall conform to that predominant setback The Director of Community Development may allow a different. setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply 1. The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2. The proposed .setback would save.significant natural features, as defined in Section 9 - 188. 3. The proposed setback is. neces ary to meet City, .,�State or F ederal reaulations� such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations . 4. The proposed setback is necessary for energy_ saving, health ` or safety reasons . 5. The house is in a new development planned with larger setbacks. The City shall consider the front yard setback as a minimum for accessory buildin s. ,The-City may approve a A conditional use permit ntavx l -- q t construction effi a building addition, :'E$ -,i -.gig ,. --�,h- a ' �,- or part thereof, into a :na auired setback (Code 1965, 904.040; Ord. No. 576, 1; 1-14-85) Section 4. Section 36 -78 in the R -1 district is added as follows: Sect 36 -78. Dwelling orientation on interiorlots_ The front of a dwell ina on, , an interior shall face a public street and shall be allowed to be ,positioned up to a thirty (3 0) degree angle from the , line of the street,, unless the dwelling does not have an apparent .front side. The front is generally the longer side of the building and has a front door. This section shall not.,apply_.,to corner lots. The Director of Community Development may allow a different orientation if the proposed orientation .wo not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding' urround nc' properties and if any of the _following conditions apples 1. The proposed orientation would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2. The Droposed orientation would save, significant natural features. defined in Section 9-188, 21 30 The prop osed .. grienta tion is necess • ar to meet C State or Federal re ulations such as • setback or no' the 1 ellne ise recfulations . 40 The ro osed.orientation is necessa savin •r safety reas health for ener - ons. Section 5. Section 36 - 81 in the RE Res' • changed as foil Res idence Estate District is g ows: Sec. 36 - 81. Permitted and conditiona uses. Any permitted or conditional use ermitt ,p ed in an R - 1 Residence District (single dwelling) is permitted in a R Residence Estate District* Such E uses are subiect to the R - re ulations exce t -as stated in Sections 36 -82 and 36 -83. Section 6. Section 36 -84.4 i the R -1S Small - Lot Single Dwellin District is changed as follows: g See, 36 - 84.4. Front yards. Each 3-e dwelling shall have a front ar %MOP &M-7 least nct ---- -�-� -- y d setback of t thirty (30) feet but not more than -thirty- five (3 5 feet • - _- _________ ._.. .r.. a%j 6 �.., , eet _ Except that , i f 3-f i mer the majority of the dwell in s o same side of the same street and w g n the ithin three hundred and fi 350 feet of the lot to be built on have a redominant front yard setback p • then all dwelli s or additio on that i:1M'ft=iM O t �. r. '. +. 1r V L = —e r e.. e.. V vfto%^ W.&O .evepl a shall conform to redo that %A AN NOW setback. The Director. of C predominant ommunit Develo merit m allow a different setback i f it wo a uld not adversel affect the dra�na a of sur d - and if anv of the followin conditions aDj2ly,_ 1. The ro osed setback would not affec t the ri ' vac of adacent homes. ?. The DroDoaed setback would save si ' nl f leant natural features. , as defined in -18 9 8 . 3. The proposed setback is necessary t ' o meet Clt .State or Federal re ulations such as the i elfin noise re lations. a setback or 4. The jpropo setback is necessary for health or safet teas r ener -savin reas 5. The house is in a new develo ment • setbacks. Tanned with larger The shall consider the front ar d setback as a minimum for accessory buildin s. The City mav aDDrove a ' conditional use 22 permit to construct a building_addition. or pa thereof into a reauired setback.. (Code 1965, _ 904.040.; Ord. No. 576, 1 t1- ,14-85 Section 7. Section 36- 84.11 in the R -1S' District is added as follows: Sec. 36- 84.11 Dwelling orientation. The front of a dwelling on an interior lot shall face a public street and shall be allowed. to be Dositoned up_.to a thirt(30). de ree angle from the line of the street, unless the dwel l ina does not have an a „parent front side. The front is generally he . l onaer side of the bu i l d in,g and has a f ront door This section hall not aRRly_ - to corner lots The Director of Community Development , may allow a different, orientation if the proposed orientation.would not adversely affect.the drainage, o f surrounding properties and .,,if any ` „of the following conditions ap lye 1. The proposed orientation would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2. The propose, d orientation would, save significant natural features . . as defined in Section 9 - 188 3. The proposed orientation is necessary to meet.City, S tate or Federal L recmlations, such as the _pigeline setback or noise regulations_ 4. The proposed orientation is necessary for energy- c.�., health or safety reasons. ,. Section 8. Section 36 - 89 in the R - 2 Double Dwelling District is changed as follows: Seca 36 -89. Front yards. Each ' �*- ~� �� ' -'' nAsz �� W s:bri dwelling shall have a lhm front yard setback of at least ' AMM 4- n thirty (30) feet, but more than thirty -five (35) feet =„ a ''""4']" fa "" er Except that,, if -_-* _ = j 1 5 5 01 ne ee 6Wf. 4E. 0 the majority of the dwellings es. on the same side of the .same street 'L'L " and within three hundred and fifty (35QI feet of the lot to be built on have a pred ominant front yar setback %WAL -� i�- 5sz'"~ ^' %OP JL&%OL 46 b. ' Wa Pk i , b la i wb y--�� :a a , then all '� a%1 1 ' -- J. In ~' dwellings or additions on that lot , a -6- =0 0 46- ..,� �,..... ,a shall conform to that predominant setback. The Director of Community Development L may allow a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the. folly ng conditions apply_ 23 1. The proposed setback would not affect the of adjacent homes_ 2. The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in Section 9 - 188" 3. The proposed setback is, necessary to meet. City, State or Federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or no re .,lations. 4. The proposed setback is necessa fo _ergy- saving, health or safety. . easons. 50 The house is in a new development planned ,with larger setbacks.' The City shall consider the f ront Yard setback as a minimum for access y bu ldngse�e�- ceen' ef a3 Am 4=14A4 The City may approve a conditional use permit to.construct a buildinct a ddition, or part thereof, into a required setback. (Code 1965, 904.040 Ord. No,, 576,, 1,t1- _14, -85 Section 9e Section 36 -95 in the R -2 district is added as follows: Sec. 36 - 95. Dwelling orientation The front of a dwelling on an interior lot shall . face a Public street and shall be allowed to be positioned up to thirty C30) decfree angle from the line. of the street, unless the dwelling doees, not have , an apparent front side. The front is generally the longer side of the building and has a front door. This section shall not apply to corner lots. The Director of Commun Development may allow a different, orientation if L the proposed orientation would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any _of the following conditions apples 16 The proposed..orientation would not affeCtL the privacy of adjacent homes.. 29 The proposed orientation would save significant natural features, as defined in Section 9 -1880 3. The proposed orientation is necessary t meet City Sta or Federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations. 4. The proposed orientation is necessary for energy- saving, health or saf ty reasons. 24 Section 10. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on go\mem025.ord 1991. 25 Plannin Commission Minutes 7-1-91 b* CodaChan Sin and Double D wellin g s Secretar Olson presented the staff report. The Commissioners compared the staff and Plannin Commi.ssion versions of the draft ordinance and made modifications to combine these two versions into one revised ordinance to be subm, itted for approval to the Cit Council. Commissioner Rossbach moved approval of the ordinance re front y ard setback re and buildin locations for sin and double dwellin Commissioner Martin seconded A -Anit z ber Axda,hl Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach Na The motion passed.. 26 HRA Minutes 7-9-91 commissioner uer se. ded A Pearson, Tauer, Whitcomb The motion pass The HRA disc ed the ah report's info rmation on Truth-in-H s S` S in g Jn Mapi 7* NEW BUSINESS. a. Setbacks for Sin and Double Dwellin Ken Roberts, Associate Planner,, presented the staff report for this proposed code chan for sin and double dwellin The Commission discussed various examples of controversial dwellin referenced in the staff report. The Commissioners discussed whether this proposed code chan will create more problems than it will solve, since the percenta of setback problems with dwellin is ver small,, The Commission discussed how this ordinance would affect draina patterns with land bein platted, the increase in staff and development time re and the potential for added costs. Commissioner Whitcomb moved the HRA recommend adoption of the ordinance as presented in the staff report of Jul 2. 1991, with a one-' sunset and a review after six months. commissioner Pearson. seconded A Whitcomb Na Tauer The motion failed. Commissioner Fischer moved the HRA recommend the Cit Council make no chan to the ordinance because the HRA has serious reservations with the need for the proposed ordinance. It ma result in more problems than it is intended to solve, particularl with some of our more challen land left to develop. Certainl we can expect additional time to. be consumed b the process, additional staff and development time. As we face limited resources, is this the best utilization of staff time and housin dollars? If the Council is intent upon enactin this ordinance, it is recommended that it be for a one y ear period with. a review of the HRA Minutes 7-5-91 --3 - ordinance after six months to determine the need or how often each of the various conditions of review were utilized Commissioner Tauer seconded AYes Fischer, Pearson, • Tauer, Whitcomb The motion passed, 80 DA OF NEXT M ING a. gust 3, 1991. 9. ADJOU T Meet g adj urned at 9:23 p.m. MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT, PROJECT: DATE �atiox by Counoij : d0ree Rejected--.- - City Manager Dat Dire ctor of Community Development m pent Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat Autumnwood V of Maplewood July 18, 1991 On May 13, 1991, the City Council denied a req from Rottlund Comp for � the P y a change In the land.use plan from RM (residential medium) density to RH (residential high) g ) density. The Council tabled the request for a conditional use permit for a planned unit development and a relimina p ry plat until August 12, 1.991. The Council wanted to give the developer a chance revise the plan to meet to p the present land use plan density. Todd Stutz with the Rottlund Company, told me that they are no longer interested In this property. The could not ,Y reach an agreement with the property owner on price, based on the present density. RECOMMENDATION Deny the conditional use permit and preliminary plat • that: p y p on the basis 1• The proposed plan would have more units than allowed by the Ci ty' s land use plan. 2. The proposed plan would not resew p e the wetland and open space that serves as a buffer for the homes to the east. go /memoll.mem (section 14) Attachment: April 17 staff report. r- � MEMO�DUM TO: City.Manager FROM: Director of Community Development pment SUBJECT Land Use Plan Change, Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development and Preliminar P LOCATION: Beebe Road Y Plat , North of Larpenteur Avenue DATE: April 17, 1991 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The Rottlund Company, Inc, is requesting hree a the 124-unit g approvals to develop p Autumnwood Villas of Maplewood condominium project: (Seetheir letter on a e 19. p g ) 10 A land use plan change from RM residen • RM ( residential medium density) to RH (residential high density) for the 15.6 acre ' Code deffines a site. The City the proposed condominium units as town houses. The RM land use designation allows u to p 76 town house units on the site or 4.9 units per acre. The RH land use designation would allow up to 131 town house se units or 804 units per acre. 2. A conditional use permit ( for a lanned merit ( PUD) p unit develo p •n The City has zoned part of the property R - (mult dwelling resident' p p y g ial) and the remainder F (farm residential). The CUP would allow the multiple s in the F dwellings zone, but would limit development to the approved plan. Any major changes to this lan would-re royal. p quire City Council approval, (There is a copy of the site plan on page .15 and a picture of one of the buildings on page 18. g p g ) 3• A preliminary plat to divide the ro ert p p y Into 12 lots -one for each building* (See the proposed plat on page 14. g ) BACKGROUND May18, 1989 The City Council approved a preliminary revision to the CUP for nary plat, a r the apartments to the north and a CUP for a new PUD on the site we are now considering or ' g condominiums. This PUD was the. 120-u Southwinds Apartments. The density as 903 units per acre. The developer lost h' Y p is financing commitments in mid -1990 and he never started the ro'ec • on .a a 23. p 7 t• (See the site plan , page g ) August 20, 1990: The City Council lowered the maxim ' le dwellings. um densities for multi p g The change made the new RH about the same is the old RM density. Septembe 10, 1990 The property owners appeared a ' and presented pp t a Counc meeting p ented a letter requesting that the Council exempt their property from the density hap e T p Y g . They thought the change would cause their limited partnership financial ruin. (See their letter on page 21.) The Council advised them to follow normal procedures. DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Change The City should only change its land use plan when there are reasons that are unique to the site and in the public interest. The property owners' main argument is that they have invested money in this site based on the previous density tables. They feel that the current density limits will cause their partnership financial ruin. Reducing the density tables reduces the number of units that can be built on a site. Fewer units means less value. This is not unique to this site. There are several e and large g undeveloped sites planned for multiple dwellings that are in a similar situation. Approving a land use plan change based on economics alone would set a precedent for these sites. The City has avoided considering economics as a justification for land use changes. The neighbors are concerned with the number of multiple dwellings in the area now. They are worried that increasing the densit will also increase traffic and the number of people living in the area. There are about twice as many multiple dwellings in this area as allowed under the current density limits. Archer Heights has 168 units and the Green Gate Apartments has 108 units. There are also 4 four- plexes on the west side of Beebe Road. This is a total of 292 multiple - dwellings on 20.3 acres or 14..4 units -per acre. The maximum density allowed by the current standards is 7.0.units per acre. Changing the land use plan for this site would allow an extra 48 units over the current density. One of the main uses of an RM classification is to allow multiple dwellings at a lesser density than RH next to single dwellings-, Given the existing multiple dwellings in the area, the RM classification would be more compatible with the single dwellings to the east than the RH classification. If the Council increases the density here, what basis will there be to hold the line in other RM areas? Planned Unit Development If the Council does not approve the requested land use plan change, then the City cannot approve the planned unit development or plat. The following discussion only applies if the Council changes the land use plan. The main problem with the planned unit development is the closeness of the buildings and parking lot to the east property line. Because these are two -story buildings, more of the lot is 2 covered than the previous three -story apartment ro'ect. T project had more p J he previous p 7 re setback along the east property line and preserved the trees as a buffer. (Refer to the la hbors orlon p non page 23.) Several ne g g the east property line are concerned about losing privacy and open space Most of the trees that.the site will lose are along he east ands g property line - near the backyards of the lots on Howard Street. (See the tree. survey nd y proposed tree preservation and landscaping plans on pages 16 and 17.) In order to preserve the buffer area and still maximize density, developer . Y a per will, probably have to build a Y p three- story project. These are usuall artments . These neighbors are also concerned with the fillip an orlon g d retaining wall proposed g the east lot line and its effect on.the drainage. There is a wetland that the developer wants to fell. This would require a ermit from the p Watershed Board. The administrator for the Watershed Board recommends against ' g t filling the wetlands I the developer must fill it,-the Board will require a permit and replacement of the wetland or a contribution to the Board's replacement fund. The Corps of Engineers will also require a permit if the developer per plans to fill more than one acre of wetland. The proposed site zoning district, parking spaces.. least 30 parking Preliminary Tra plan meets most of the requirements There is, however, a shortage of 30 The developer should revise the plans spaces, of the R -3 outdoor to add at When the City Council approved the Southwinds Apa rtment p rtment preliminary plat, one of the conditions was about a walkway easement between Furness Street and Larpenteur Avenues The condition stated "a ten -foot -wide walkway easement shall be shown on the plat from the east -west trail to Lar enteur Ave p nue along the former trolley line." The developer of this project is not ro osin a walk p p g way between Furness Street a nd.Larpenteur Avenue, because he is planning 1 buildings in this area. At least one o f the neighbors is objecting to,a trail. They feel it would red ' reduce their privacy and result in tree loss. . The developer is proposing an alternative alignment ' - an eight-foot-wide g for this- walkwa Y bituminous trail between Furness Street and the school property west of Beebe Road. ' In addition, Staff is recommending a sidewalk along eebe Road oad, from the north property line to Larpenteur Avenue. The City ouncil re i such a sidewalk for the Y � red Southwinds Apartments. This will give pedestrians in this an off - street route to Larpenteur 3 Avenue. Another way for a person to get between Furness Street and Larpenteur Avenue is to use Ripley Avenue and Howard Streets. Public versus Private Street The developer is proposing a public cul -de -sac, east of Beebe Road. The Director of Public Works thinks that the number and width of drives on the end of the cul -de -sac ma y cause some snow plowing complaints.. The City will plow around the cul-de -sac leaving snow in the drives. People who live on the private drives may complain if the plowin service hired to do the g private drives does not plow them out quickly enough. The Director of Public Safety thinks that the cul -de -sac should be publ because of the large number of units it serves, He wants to make sure there is dependable.access and lowin . He P g also wants the extra width of a public street for on- street parking and access by emergency vehicles. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Deny the requested plan change from RM (residential medium density) to RH (residential high density)* This denial is because: a. The land owners are basing their reasons for change on .economics, rather than land use considerations. b. There are about twice as many multiple- dwellings in this area as allowed under the current density tables. c. Given the existing multiple dwellings in the area, the RM classification would be more compatible with the single dwellings to.the east than the RH classification. d. The current density would allow the developer to reduce the number of buildings and preserve a buffer area along the east property line. 2e Deny the CUP for a PUD because it would have more units than allowed by the RM land use plan designation. _ 3• Deny the preliminary plat because the PUD would have more units than allowed by the RM land use plan designation. If the Council wishes to approve this ro'ect the should do P � ► Y the following, 1.1owing 11 Approve the resolution on page 25 which changes the land use. plan from RM (residential medium density) to RH (residential 4 high density). The Council should add their reasons for the change 2. Approve the resolution on a e 26 which hich approves a CUP for a PUD p g for the Autumnwood Villas condominiums. A is because the . project would Ap p d meet the ten f indings for a CUP This approval is subject to following conditions a. Adherence to the site plan dated 10 -22 - 90 and the conditions required by the Community Desi n Revi ew maj Board. The City g , Council must approve or changes to the site plan. The director for of community development may approve minor changes. b. No outdoor storage of recreational vehicles, boats. or 3. C* The developer posting all streets and drive aisles that have less than 32 feet of pavement width with "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs. The developer shall paint al p l also p 1 curbing in the no parking areas yellow. d. This permit shall be subject to review after one ea roval b y r from the date of approval based on the procedures in City Code. Approve the preliminary plat for Autumnwood Villas subject to the developer completing the p g following conditions before final plat approval: a. The provision and recording of cross easements for Utilities and access to all lots. b. The developer shall show a 10 foot -wide ublic walkway ay easement on the plat for the east -west walkway shown on the approved plan. The walkway easement and the plans for the walkway hall be s p Y subject to the approval of the William's Brothers Pipeline Company. c. Complete.a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, for all required � qu public improvements, ponds, erosion control and tree planting. This agreement shall include, but not-be limited to: { 1) The placement of temporary fencing and signs, grading and during g g construction, around trees and woodlots that the developer will save. (2) The installation of a street light at the intersection of Beebe Road and Kingston Avenue. The exact location and type of light shall be subject to the City Engineer's ap proval, g pp al. 5 (3) An eight- foot -wide bituminous walkway, as shown on the approved plan. (4) A five -foot -wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of Beebe Road, from the north property line to Larpenteur Avenue. (5) Three eight- foot -wide bituminous walkways between the parking lots and the east -west walkway on the approved ' pl an . ' d. Submit final grading, utility, drainage, erosion- control and street plans, along with corresponding easements to.the.City Engineer for approval.. The erosion control plan shall address the recommendations of the Soil Conservation District and the Ramsey - Washington Watershed District. The erosion control. plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook. The final grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each building site. It shall also include contour information for all areas that the construction will disturb. The trees and woodlots that the developer will save shall be shown on the grading plan. The developer shall identify these trees and woodlots on the site. The City Engineer may. approve deviations from the approved final grading plan, provided.the changes follow the intent of the overall final grading plan. e. The final design and location of all retaining walls is subject. to the approval of the City Engineer. f. The developer shall form a home owners association to assure common maintenance and proper access to the units. The City Attorney shall approve all legal documents about the association. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 40 property owners within 350 feet of the site. There were 13 responses. 3 persons (including the owner were for the proposal and 10 were against the project. In. Favor 19 Good. (Castle Design and Development) 20 As long as the condominiums are not for low income - I'm all for it. (Gruber - 2179 Larpenteur Avenue) Against 1. We have enough trouble with the apartments across Beebe Road. We don't want close neighbors. With all the kids running through our property.now, we don't need condominiums. Why destroy all the wildlife we enjo watching. After living here for 75 years we would like i peace and quiet n our senior years. (Belanger and Munson 2135 Larpenteur Avenue) 2. It will ruin wildlife habitat. I also feel that an 8-foot walkway will be proposed by one of the Council members. This will be along I my property with no access across Larpenteur Avenue. There is a pond along side which would encourage another dump site. I object to this proposal because of the increase in traffic. I also object to the walkway as there are too many people walking in that area as it is, disturbing the wildlife. Also, the walkway ould be y , depriving us of the privacy of our backyard where we enjoy the wildlife. (Mroszak - 2147 Larpenteur Avenue) 39 We don't need more multiple dwellings in this area. Rezone to single dwelling residential. (Anderson - 1725 Howard St. ) 40 I object to this proposal because its taking away our natural wild life area and you're over populating the area that your working with. Why not leave out the five - eight unit buildings? That still leaves 84 families moving into that small of an area. Plus you would still be able to keep a lot of the wild life area and you wouldn't be right u p to my property line. Also, it would make it a lot more attractive for people wanting to buy. If you look around the area and notice all the other homes available, you'd realize how hard it is going to be to sell them. (Fredrickson*- 1753 Howard Street) 59 The development as I see it on the site plan would require filling in a large portion of a storm water pond easement immediately west of Lots 1 through 8. This would seem to 7 require deepening the remainder of the easement to accommodate the increased storm water creating a drowning hazard. Destroying wetland is not sound management of resources. Our neighborhood has enough apartments and increased. traf f ic and school enrollment they bring. I would prefer that some kind of owner- occupied housing at no more than current density with the wetland staying. (Hanson - 1783 Howard St.) 6, It would be too densely populated! Develop it into a single family community like on Howard Street. There are enough multi- family developments around here. (Johnson -1811 Howard) 70 I would prefer to see the property left alone as open space. It could possibly be set aside as a wildlife refuge or some type of park with minimum development. One of.the reasons I purchased my home in this area of Maplewood was because of the large lots and.the large proportion of open space, in particular, the woods. with the large amount of development being done in east Maplewood, along McKnight, I think that it would be appropriate to leave this area natural as it is for those of us who - like living in an area with more open space around us. If the property must be developed, do we have to have to put in more apartments or condominiums? There are four apartment complexes adjoining each other in this area already. (Heintz - 1821 Howard Street) 8 I don't see why there has to be so many buildings and why they are so close to the east edge of the property. I live right next to the northeast corner of the ro osed ro'ect. p p p 7 The plan that you sent shows building and parking lots very close to. my backyard. Does it have to be so? A couple of years ago a plan was presented for apartments on this property and it included some area of the natural woods on the east edge of the property. That is a much better arrangement. One good thing is that road access is shown only to Beebe Road. This is good since there is already a lot of car traffic on Ripley. (Benson - 2178 Ripley) 90 It is not consistent with the current comprehensive plan densities - given the already high densities to the north, no additional density should be approved. If a trail is paved it should be 10 feet wide to accommodate bikes and walkers. There should be a north -south trail probably along the old street car right -of -way to at least partially compensate for the lack of Furness Street extension. Trails are very important in this are both because of the lack of through streets and the number of pedestrian -bike traffic generators - 4 schools, tennis courts, parks, swimming pools, shopping and employment. (Fischer - 1812 Furness) 10. See the letter on page 24. 8 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Area.: 15.6 acres Existing land use: vacant Property owner: Georgetown Commons (John Sauro) VEGETATION There are trees and brush scattered throughout the site. Most of the vegetation is deciduous although there are a few large g evergreen trees. Most of the large trees. are along the north and east. sides of the property. Many of these are cottonwood and aspen trees. SURROUNDING LAND USES North: The Archer Heights and Green Gate Apartments Green Gate was Phase I of the original Fred Moore PUD, while Archer Heights was Phase II of.that PUD. East: Single -- family dwellings fronting on Howard Street, South: Single— family dwellings on Larpenteur Avenue and four four - plexes on the west side of Beebe Road, West: Mounds Park Academy and ISD 622 property. PAST ACTIONS May 22, 1986: The City Cou this site called Southwinds approval was subject to the before final plat approval, west side of Beebe Road and Beebe Road. ncil approved a preliminary plat for of Maplewood 2nd Addition. This developer completing nine conditions This proposal had five lots on the one large lot on the east side of August 22, 1988: The City Council approved the Southwinds of Maplewood 2nd Addition final plat. The developer revised this final plat from the approved reliminar lat. The final plat P Y p p had one lot on the west side of Beebe Road. The approved preliminary plat had five lots on the west side of Beebe Road. This is how the property is platted now. PUBLIC WORKS The land use plan shows Beebe Road and Holloway Avenue as collector streets. Maplewood, North Saint Paul and Ramsey County have entered into an agreement to construct Holloway Avenue between Beebe Road and Furness Street. The City Engineer expects that these agencies will have the street built later this year or in 1992. The land use plan shows Larpenteur Avenue and North Saint Paul Road as minor arterial streets. go\memo2 3 . mem Attachments 19 Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map 3. Property Line /Zoning Map 40 Proposed Preliminary Plat 5. Site Plan 6. Tree Survey 70 Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan 8o Picture of a building 90 Letter: Rottlund Homes 10. Letter: Stan Yocum (Georgetown Commons) 11. Southwinds Apartments site plan 12. Letter: Fretz of 2180 Ripley Avenue 130 Resolution: Plan Amendment 14 . Resolution: CUP 10 a o Co > Z I RD 23 , • o N ►- T29N ~ z _j W W EOG. HILL RO 10111 J i/f Q W Z F- W OEMONT AV ao p N o z QE E Four P� ��'��'�' AV 414T XTAN T AV * Seasons Pt co 74( GERVAIS GERM GERVM 'w IEW AV z CT t Y Y, o OR SrLE AV?:. 36 Knuckle Heod Loks P � --- t►-E AY - CO P E av g n x W a� = L.A R I E RD v 3ST wolf rz A _ v Z :: W Q ! W n CO RD AV ~ o Robin/food 0 / Pki $� 1► 4N / Q Q- N ROSEW!00 0 A✓ S S I P 4 P :1 SSG osss U 28 0 G o 29 G �` 1 SUM W 1 QpJ a°c Y 10 W 12 >- �.� �X IC ac m I y P INWT N AV : � // U. �%& •:.�.••- LAK ac i _ PRICE A S CL's 3 _ m 2 W '1 s4 05 . ST. PAUL NORTH SQ /NT PAUL LOCATION MAP ...... X0 ......,. PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS 4 N 11 Attachment 1 68 119 HOL LOW AY :� .......... ......... ..: N H11/side Pk W � ac AV cc Y '''• 3 MC KN /GH T LN XX LARPENTEUR o. LOCATION MAP ...... X0 ......,. PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS 4 N 11 Attachment 1 • r .. • �..�...�.. ��+.� • y d er. ' �...�..� . ... a 6 '� .:{..r•. {{{ tw rev" T eti rr•waJut. �ssttl�.•� ;'�'• .,ALL �" •• r` � � �.• •ti.`• 1 '• a �1 • � r. . A-0 i A a _ P.#6: _ may or colle y - - •�� , 1f1.1�f1 IT1 • t 11/ till 1 t......•.1t1�{f� .�.• C�� L - �'t' . C3 '-P -R[ RM R I major arterial QS • W LSC 3 =J cc co au somm a I b vo M ra -s Revised: 10 -06 -83 7 -07 -86 0S 8 -27 -84 7 -21 -86 R m 3 -11 -85 •� _ H i I I s i d e ADD LA USE PLAI R1= RE:SIDENTIAL LOWER DENSITY Rm= RESIDENT.IAL MEDIUM DENSITY Rh= RESIDENTIAL HIGHER DENSITY LSC= LIMITED SERVICE SERVICE COMMERCIA CENTER Hot l oway i A O A cc E O J1 Larpenteur ,,.. .PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS LAND USE PLAN 12 Attachment 2 i4 N \ 5 4 Ncoo 0 (4,0 3 S.S3 o.t N 4.8 G 193 ... O 11� `tai Q 0 ttww , 4 _J A p • T 1 4 0 A o, 1831 \ ` - r �44 CO D \off ' N ,�► r I f 3'182-f Q4 43A 1&4. bra p U �r'' �,� \ 1 oGO I ts 1 111,- • � .\ � 84 Ise ! _ «. 1 q Won ,� I • t !" �� .. - --• ." GO 1314 W • 1�: � - :� • t . i • • .. .... • ... ; . a ;,. o I b f►.e• .. ... No: o 2. . •r.;:• .....:.... ...�.'� o �y 124 L G 5 ,., ... r.. ..c• K1 - - . ............... :. Fi� i� .... . ..'.•► Nib 14 1 it l' j 1 _ �' ..' ........ ; f j 4 ?� .. ....... 7' f too- I� O 1 ��I//i W �'~ p 1�•� ,:��• �� .'� y. ��,J7; Ir � d. C L 103, 1 1 ! < � � ;.-�.;. , -,•� t _ � Z � 9 . 0 Is tot RI 01 O ,020 �'� O 1.03 o.C,. i o . •'.., ;, V:• 2169 �3t o e. 10 u �,� �e� N ry; 8$ • , 2135; .•:�''• 2179 0 • �.. .: ;a ;.:• +•;; ( <3�) (3a1 � Iq � otc 1 « .:...... . F2 GO 2095 }� vb:• • GC VA A H. s4 Z et. -r Es. _ARPE n ST. PAUL PROPOSED CONDOMINIUMS N PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP _R1= RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DWELLING R3= RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DWELLING R2= RESIDENTIAL DOUBLE DWELLING F =FARM RESIDENCE ot- 13 Attachment 3 i fib , o f i' s s _ S PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT Q N a 14 Attachment 4 SITE PLAN Q N 15 Atta chment 5 r.,e< R LEY t 1 ' � i �w ♦ � i t 1 I 1 � SITE PLAN Q N 15 Atta chment 5 •w ♦v . M .i YdYwd Od O 1�W �7 /r • • Aw A�iMW w � a 4 A r �w r w ~ �w�e ~ ir �ew►� �a�t !�s` � ®� �� r iw�i► Z� i r ��s ui s -� iMi� Its fie,, � '� � �.� r:.,.° �,�► 'r up v` .3 oil *AI,A � •e � '` - ® �� .fit j � � '• 1 .�R � tom, f i • • i TREE SURVEY 16 4 N Attachment 6 J .. or gmto O pp wd 06 Ow sWrwe � 1 WAM nes Mr w ol t, Its t � 1 1 Ire r Ab �i u ■ IN • o - � p � 0 4D ®fir •� ��•... � /� • s • TREE PRESERVATION AND .Q. LANDSCAPING PLAN N 17 Attachment 7 7 AIF % , . I - 0,0. A 11 WK S N o �v-. I 7/ OF Al -XI q;$ V. jj JAO qw "I � � � . X11 \ \ � '^ \ �i I � `` � �.< ,r 1` ►� !Imo� . ,•'��•. •�• •..'.... ; t, 1�1v,� � �.I ■' / S q W Vric v . - ti r ; " 17?,N�or P Ql' % , Ni tlp 0 Vkk, .63M 0 a N% I . . \ , I& - . 1 • v �(,► / ;.•■ y�►,• .1 � � 'f 1 1 ♦ • ` •�.� ;Y,.• �� .� :`• H �, ' ''Z 17•i �• ,{ ► 17.1 1 ,�'•+ •f f ,�'• � / 1! /% �.i . v s. pad 'fop v- 4 Vill Tr le-l'; 1 �wp i; ►Ae !�F;, 1 ' �:j1J,'�r• ,, 1„ \►.. ATS N A NI I % SS 1. '1 'r -W if r, f., Yff 4 v 10 PM ` � I- .\► I!r �•� /' iA�� /� .w r a ``• •�_ ��_ I's ,.1 oML`mF_11 �.yl .� ��e, �• /'1 � r,_`,�.1',,�1 t '• a , /'�� I%/ �,!1• � 11 � 1 AMR %IV =� N ...... % • „�•} 'N♦ /' ` 1q ,1 �` � �: 1 1111111t11111111111Illllllllllllllllllllllt 111.111111111111 11111 1 1 1111111111111111111 __°•�_a aw ��•► \1�• � A,� \�,! • • a �� ' � / � e \� � ► I I "• �,. 11 .•.... 111111111 1111111111•x, :. ,. I ( 1 11111 11 1111 •'111 1.,,,, ,,, IIIItl11 1 1 ` ( : f t I. � � // / . � � � i MINA, t 11111 WIV M 1, V fi In's �%. .� I, _. ■. 1% pj t ja III -pill j i � L%.1 "' - ' 1 :, ” ■ 101 It, one ; mi OWN-- Il I Malin am 0 k,4 Q!= 4 N Vill .1bael, evem IL i t NUNN lot 14� I Lin Is i jol- 2 MEIN F ., MIN1111011 Elm Mimi 10011 IWIMI a ME nn "Ova vz rift EL .4 F --- p I lip 1 7 " 1. In °' " fox "WIX Ilk T 1� '�.�� '�.�r•`��►��'�'.r � • +ate a •.,,,�• •r +'�!.1� r /, � V '!�r: •' r /' i � Your Bui lderforLife i LN" ROTrL , ND HOMES A DIVISION OF THE ROTTLUND COMPANY. INC. January 15, 1991 Mr. Geoffrey Olson Director of Community Development y P City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Autumnwood Villas of Maplewood Beebe Road and Larpenteur Avenue Dear Mr. Olson: The Rottlund Company, Inc. is excited to ro ose Autumnwood Villas of Maplewood le p P p wood located north of Larpenteur Avenue on Beebee Road. Autumnwood Villas will be a 124 unit condominium project comprised of five 8 unit buildings and g seven 12 unit buildin s. since 1988 The Rottlund Company, Inc. has developed seven en Villa Communities in the - Cities of Brooklyn Park Apple Valle Coon Rapids, y ' pp Y, pi.ds, Shoreview, Blaine, Inver Grove Heights and Plymouth. To date we have sold approximately 50 Villas in these communities which h hi.ghl i.ghts the market acceptance of this product. The closest Villas community o he Maplewood site is Wilshire re Pond Villas of Shoreview located on County Road F and Victoria Street, The Villa is a 2 bedroom, two story home with brick and aluminum exterior, private entrance • and attached garage. i. These homes range n square footage from 1080 s . f . to 1236 6 s.f., with single or double attached garage, Standard features include g oak woodwork, fireplace, washer and dryer, rand dishwasher and refrigerator. The r' g price range. of these homes will be approximately $54,900 to $69,900. In addition, all landscape areas will. have an underground sprinkler system and extensive g Y ive landscaping. Phone 612 -571 -0304 Fax 612- 571 -1085 5201 East River Road #301 Fridley, MN 55421 19 Attachment 9 January 15, 1991 Mr. Geoffrey Olson Page 2 The target market of our Villa home is singles with approximately seventy (70%) ercent of our . p buyers being single with fifty (501) percent being single females. Other characteristics of our buyers are fifty (50%).percent have incomes ranging from $25 1 000-$35,000, forte (40%) y percent . i ranging n age from 25 -29 years old, and only 417 children per household. To insure the common area and exterior of the Villas maintain uniformity and hi h alit g quality appearance, all homes will be subject to Article of Incorporation B -Laws and Declaration governing ' y g g the operation of a Homeowners Association for the project. If you have any questions or comments lease p feel free to contact me at 571 -0304. Y rs ruly, utz Land D elopment ,anager TMS /kd Enclosure autumn. 1.- doc 20 Sept. 3 1990 M Honorable Mayor, Gary Bastian 1401 Frost Ave. Maplewood, Mn 55109. Dear Mayor Bastian: Thank you for the time you took on the phone to discuss the current situation as it relates to our property in Maplewood (Southwinds of Maplewood-2nd Addition). (The 15.6 acre parcel which is divided by Beebe Road and is just north of Lar P enteur and West of Furness Street). As we discussed, the recently proposed property density conversion changes for R - 3 properties in Maplewood will have a devastating impact on the current P laps to develop this property, if applicable in our case! You'd recall that in mid - 1989 the Maplewood City Council granted approval for a Planned Unit Develop on P the 12.9 acre parcel just West of Beebe Road. This project, to be developed by Continental Development Corporation (Charles Cook) was for a complex of apartments totalling 120 units. Unfortunately Mr. Cook's financing commitments evaporated in Mid -1990 due, in part, to the S & L crisis, and our artnershi was forced to see for the property. P P k another buyer In July, 1990, The Rottlund Co., a major affordable home developer in the Metro Area signed a purchase agreement for the enure 15.6 acres to be developed into a 144 unit "Rottlund Villa" " P project. This Villa concept has been successfully developed around the Metro area in the last couple of years in Shoreview, Blaine, Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids, Apple Valley, and Plymouth. The Villa units are designed as to be very affordable "Condominiums" and as such are something of a hybrid #' design, fitting neither the apartment nor townhouse definition exactl . Most of the fanned units Will be tar y P targ eted to sell under $60,000 and thus are highly desired by 1st time buyers, single professionals, or "empty nesters" who are unable or unwillin to assume the "burdens" of conventional nil single- family home ownership. As the owners of this property for the past nearly seven years, our Limited Partnership will suffer financial ruin if the planned new density for townhouses i s applied here! And the City of Maplewood will miss a unique op to provide desir PP ty P arable, attractive and affordable housing for many Metro Area residents Who otherwise could not afford it. With this background in mind and because time is critical as it ertains to the hoped far start of development P P lopment yet this year, we respectfully wish to present our case in person before the City Council at your meeting scheduled for Sept. 10. Our Georgetown Commons Partnership and The Rottlund Co. Will have representatives P at the meeting during the Visitor Presentation Phase of your agenda. We would sincerely appreciate an opportunity o be heard and to learn n if the proposed property density changes must be applied to this project. Thanks again for your time and considered review of our ro osal. P P c.c. Michael McGuire, City Mgr. Geoff Olson, Community Planning Dir. � 21 Sincerely Yours, Stan Yocum LW. Partner, Georgetown Commons Attachment 10 SITUATION ANALYSIS (9/1/90) GEORGETOWN COMMONS LID. PARTNERSHIP "The partnership was formed on 11/13/83 at which time we purchased 15.6 acres of tax forfeited .land from Ramsey County for $270,600. "From 11/15/83 until 2/90 various purchase agreements were signed. However, these sales were never completed because clear title was not provided by The County Title Examiner until Febru :,rv..1990H (over 6 years from date of purchase.) "Since 1983, the partners have spent over $285,000 out -of- pocket for: ,Property Taxes, Interest, Special Assessments, Principal, Professional Legal, Survey and Accounting Fees. There currently remains an outstanding balance due of $165,000 for the mortgage on the property. (P 11 -1 /2% APR Interest) *In Mid July 1990, The Rottlund Company signed a purchase agreement for the entire parcel for a purchase price of $405,000. Even though this is more_ than we originally paid for the property, the partnership will still in cur a loss of over $138,000 due to remaining outstanding obligations. * *On Aug 27th the Maplewood City Council . passed an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City which reduced the permissable density for R -3 Zoned properties from 11.6 /acre for apts. and 8.1 /acre for townhomes to 7unts /acre and 4.9 units /acre respectively. The net effect of this action is to completely destroy the viability of the planned Rottlund project, and to reduce the value of the Georgetown property by approximately 40V IARD&I of DensitxCo.n T ,� o1a n s! nda e,. ;, If the Aug 27th Amendment applies to the Georgetown Commons property, the partnership will most probably be forced to abandon the current proposed project with Rottlund Co. and let the property fall into a state of forfeiture. Under this scenario - everybody loses: *The partnership loses the land and its $285,000 investment to date. *Rottlund loses its opportunity to develop a worthwhile project. 'The City and County lose a very substantial tax base and their ability to collect the special assessments levied on the property. (Future tax collections could run in the $75,000 - 100,000 range /year) *The community loses its opportunity to provide affordable, attractive housing at a time when home ownership is becoming increasingly difficult for 1st time -buyers. *Local business loses the economic benefits of increased home ownership in the neighborhood. 22 Co s • �� !ili� a I I I I I I I I r)►! i xv AML Alildiv dft age soo 480 e lf APPROVED SOUTHWINDS SITE PLAN Attachment 71 23 Mr. and Mrs R.. Fretz 2180 Ripley. Ave Map MN 55109 Jan. 31, 1991 Geoff Olson Director of Community Development Dear Mr. Olson; We object to the Autumnwood Vilas proposal primarily because there is negligible natural vegatation left on the East and North sides of the property. A few years ago the Maplewood Planning staff worked out a plan for apartments for much of this same property. That plan was much better. It provided for. a border of the present natural woods to be left along the North and East boundaries of the property. It is seems that the width of this uncut woods should be at least 20 or 1 3 0 feet wide There ar e a number of advantages for such a natural border. For us the main advantage is the aesthetics. In the applicants plan, pp p our backyard on R ipley Ave. would view the parking lots of the condominiums. With a natural border, both the neighborhood and Condominium residents would see a little nature instead. Another advantage of a natural border is that some of that area is wetland and i s useful for flood control and water cleaning., Perhaps the builder of the condoniniums will object to leavin g a natural border because of economics. However, the requirement for leaving a border is not one -sided and capricious. As noted, the p lan worked out for the previous applicant had such a border. Also the two apartment complexes to the north.have a natural region separatin g them. In addition many of neighbors have natural areas on the backs of their proterties. Therefore, this request that the a natural border be required is a request that the new builder meet standards that are already In place. We thank you for your consideration and hope that a mutually satisfactory arrangement can be worked out. Sincerely, �- Bob and Nancy re ` y z Attachment 12 24 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Rottlund Company applied for a change to the City's.land use plan from RM (residential medium density) to RH (residential high density. WHEREAS, this change applies to Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 of the Southwinds of Maplewood 2nd Addition. WHEREAS, the history of this change is.as follows: 10 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 1 1 1991. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required.by law. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that. the plan amendment be . 2. The City Council and recommendatil City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT the above - described change 1. 2. OF discussed the plan amendment on 1991. They considered reports ons from the Planning Commission and RESOLVED that the City Council approve for the following reasons. Adopted on 1 .1991 25 Attachment 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Rottlund Company applied for a conditional use permit to develop a planned unit development of 124 condominium units in 12 buildings. WHEREAS, this permit applies to Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 of the Southwinds of Maplewood 2nd Addition. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 11 The Planning Commission discussed this application on April 1 1991. They recommended to the City Council that said permit be 2. The City Council held a public hearing on 1991. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The.Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and. Planning Commission,, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the above - described conditional use reasons: 1. The use would be located, constructed and operated City's Comprehensive Plan that the City Council approve permit for the following designed, maintained, to be in conformity with the and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 26 Attachment 14 6. The use would be ser b ade public facilities and se r vices, includi streets, police-and fire protection,, draina structures,, water and sewer r s schools and parks. 70 T he use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8* The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and. scenic features into the development desi 90 The use would cause minimal adverse environmental .effects* Approval is subject to the followin conditions: a. Adherence to the site plan dated 10-22-90 and the conditions re b the Communit Desi Review Board. The Cit Council must approve m ajor chan to the site plan. The director of communit development ma approve minor chan b No outdoor stora of recreational vehicles,, boats or trailers . c. The developer postin all streets and drive aisles that have less than 3.2 feet of pavement width with "No P a rkin g - Fire Lane" si The developer shall also paint all curbin in.the no parkin areas y ellow, d This permit shall be subject to review after one y ear from the date of approval., based on the procedures in Cit Code. Adopted 1 19919 27 Maplewood Planning Commission - 3- Minut 4 - 1 - 91 sinceNthe current zoning is R - 1, it doesn't make sense to ch�n a the zoning until devel ' roposed g g p is . Commis 'oner Frost seconded After so a discussion on what future zoning would be appropria e for this property, Comm' ssioner Rossbach .amended h.i motion changing number three to rea ".., an LSC lan use designation woul be more appropriate for this pr erty." The commissio ers discussed w ether it is.necessar Y to make this mote since the urrent zoning is R - and no change in th zoning is roposed. The Commission vo d as f llows: Ayes- -Sinn Nays-- Anitzberger, A hl, Cardinal, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Ros ba h Abstentions - -Fisc r The motion fail Commissioner F Scher moved th Planning Commission recommend to ing any action u til it is known whether or not the A will grant a vari nce for construction of single ellings on this site. Commissio er Cardinal seconded yes I -Anitzberger, dahl, Cardinal, F1 cher, Frost, Ma tin, Pearson, Ros ach, Sinn Nays -- Gerke The motion passed. b. 7:15 p.m. - Beebe Road, north of Larpenteur Avenue (Autumnwood Villas): Land Use Plan Change, Conditional Use Permit for a PUD, Preliminary Plat Secretary Olson read the public hearing notice. Mr. Olson.reminded the public that the developers were unable to attend this meeting and they asked that this item be considered at the next meeting. 0► Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes 0 4 -1--91 The commission opened the meeting to the public for those people who would not be able to attend the next meeting and wished to comment. Gerald Hanson, 1783 Howard Street, said there are enough existing multiple dwellings in this neighborhood. Mr. Hanson estioned why the � Y pond included as part of this development proposal, was not purchased by the City when land next to the pond was purchased for a ponding easement. The director of public works explained the existing drainage pattern and, also, that the developer will be required to get approval and obtain permits from the Corp of Engineers, Department of Natural Resources,. and Watershed.District in order to fill this wetland. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission table this item at the request of the applicant until the next meeting. W 7. Commissioner Gerke seconded The motion passed. Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Cardinal, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sinn UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Ann4a1 Report Comml sioner Fischer recommended that the names of membe s who resigned du ing the year be added to the attend nce record and also, suggested that a tour be added t .1991 planne activities. Commissio er Ross .ch proposed that future workshops be held for t e Pla ing Commission to consider zoning goals for t e C comprehensive plan and a meeting with the Cit ouncil be planned to discuss future planning goa NEW BUSINESS a . Planned/Unit Developments (PUDs) Comm' sioner Ross ch discussed previous workshops he has ttended on PU Commissioner Rossbach said that a 11- planned PUD o djnance is something that would 1 Maplewood Planning Commission - 2- Minutes 4 - -91 which requires City officials disclose potential conflicts in ng. 69 UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Beebe Rd., North of Larpenteur Ave. (Autumnwood Villas): Land Use Plan Change, Conditional Use Permit for a PUD, Preliminary Plat Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Commissioner Fischer asked staff to explain the past -and present densities of the existing developments on the properties adjacent to the proposed project Todd Stutz, The Rottlund Company Inc., 5201 East River Road, Suite 301, Minneapolis, gave a presentation on this proposed project. Stan Yocum, 8021 Madison Street N. E., Spring Lake Park, representing the property owners, explained the past actions on this property and presented the property owners' concerns regarding zoning and densities. Bob Fretz, 2180 Ripley Avenue, said he is opposed to this development. Mr. Fretz said he is in agreement with staff regardin maintaining a buffer area along the east property line. Bruce Casselton, 1745 Howard Street, said he is concerned about the wetlands, drainage problems, costs for added emergency vehicle runs, and additional traffic in the area . Lowell Heintz - 18 2 1 Hnwa rr3 �t-rAAt- _ ca i r� t- hArc� i c gmnni, ' v� v �� i w r' v r� i M V �+ i V *. %.f existing high - density housing in the area. and he does not want more. Todd Stutz of The Rottlund Company Inc. explained that after this proposed is completed, there will be. between 250 and 350 feet remaining of undeveloped buffer area from the single dwellings. Mr. Stutz said the proposed housing will be for sale, rather than rental property. Stan Yocum, representing the property owners, said this proposed project will offer affordable housing to many single people and that it will offer a good alternative for housing. Maplewood Planning Commission -3- Minutes -15 -91 Alvin Scheid, 1759 Howard Street, asked if the drainage easements on his property were also on the property being considered for this development. The director of public works responded that all of the drainage easements acquired in 1979 are all east of the streetcar right -of -way and not a part of this development. Lois Benson, 2176 and 2178 Ripley Avenue, said she is concerned with the amount of trees and shrubbery which might be lost on the west side of her property because of this development. Ms. Benson said she did not want Ripley Avenue extended because it would bring additional traffic into the area. Commissioner Fischer asked staff if the plans submitted will meet setback requirements. Secretary Olson responded that not all parking areas shown . would meet the required setbacks and either some areas would have to be revised or a variance would be necessary. Mr. Olson said the plans submitted by the developer also show a shortage of approximately 30 parking spaces and this would have to be resolved. Commissioner Rossbach said the proposed plan shows massive grading and very little preservation of existing trees and shrubbery.. Mr. Rossbach also said he is concerned that installation of the asphalt trail and sidewalks will be delayed, since the developer is proposing development one lot at a time. Mr.'Rossbach said the problem with this project is not the density that is being considered, but that the plan is not compatible with the neighborhood. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: 11 Denial of the requested plan change RM (residential medium density) to RH (residential high density). This denial. is because: a. The land owners are basing their reasons for change on economics, rather than land use considerations. b. Current density in the existing multiple dwellings in this area is greatly in excess of both present and previous allowable densities. Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes 4- 15--91 C, Given the existing multiple dwellings in the area, th.e.RM classification would be more compatible with the single.dwellings to the east than the RH classification.. d. The current density would allow the developer to reduce the number of buildings and preserve a buffer area along the east property line. e. No additional density should be allowed on this site as it will create.additional pressure for encroachment on the remaining wetlands, particularly considering the amount of wetlands which already have been lost by the development to the north. Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl', Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The motion passed. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend denial of the CUP for a PUD because: 10 It would have more units.than allowed by the RM land use plan designation. 2. It would encroach upon the existing wetlands. 3. It is not compatible with the neighborhood. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded Ayes- Anitzberger, Axdahl - ,- Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The motion passed. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend denial of the preliminary plat because the PUD would have more units than allowed by the RM land use designation. Maplewood Planning Commission -5- Minutes 4- 154-91 Commissioner Martin seconded- The motion passed. Ayes - Anitzberger, Axdahl -Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik., Sinn Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend that if the City Council decides to change the Comprehensive Plan, this matter be referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration of the CUP and PUD. Commissioner Martin seconded The motion passed. 7. NEW BUS I11TES S a. Utili'ty Easement Vacation: Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke , Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Carlton Racqu -ball Club Ken Rob rts, Associate Planner, presen ed the staff report. Commissione Rossbach.asked the rector of public works what r sponsibility the ty has to repair damages if th water main nee s to be dug up in the future. The d rector of pu is works responded that the City would e responsi a for surface improvement damages such as awn, sm 1 shrubbery or' driveway damages. He also comme ted that the City does not want large trees Plante i an easement because of the problem of repairs responsibility for damages. Commissioner Pear n owed the Planning Commission recommend adopti of, a resolution vacating part of the utility eas ment lyl g along.the south property line of 600 C lton Stree The City is approving this vacation bec se: 1. Lt is/in the public interest. .Cation by Council: End are a a .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. . Rejeotec Date AGENDA REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Assistant City Manager N1 0 AW W A\-.1 RE: OPEN SPACE COMM E APPOINT "MENTS DATE: August 6, 1991 The results from the second ballot are not complete due to a question on the validity of the selection system. Councilperson Zappa will address his concerns at the Thursday pre - agenda meeting. Z -3 Action by Council: Mdorsed. AGENDA REPORT Nodifie , � -- ReJ eoted -. Date T0: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager RE: PRESENTATION OF PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY DATE: August 2, 1991 INTRODUCTION At the April 8, 1991 meeting, the City Council awarded a contract to Springsted, Inc. to conduct a feasibility study for the proposed community center project. The study has been completed and is being formally presented to the City Council at this meeting. A detailed review of the study will be conducted at a Council /Manager meeting later in August. The Community Center Advisory Committee presented its recommendation to the City Council last December. The Committee's recommendation stated that the City should proceed with the construction of the center, that a feasibility study should be conducted to determine if the center could support its own operating expenses, and that preliminary architectural drawings and construction cost estimates be obtained. It was felt that the information generated by the feasibility study and preliminary drawings would help everyone in making a decision about the proposed project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: formally accept the feasibility study of the proposed community center which was prepared and presented by Springsted, Inc and schedule a Council /Manager meeting at which the study will be discussed in greater detail. To FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION ,Action by Council: t or s� MEMORANDUM eC�te City Manager Dat a C �,.,,....._ . Ken Roberts., Associate Planner and City Clerk Conditional Use Permit Review and Used car License 2720 Maplewood Drive A -Gem Auto August 1, 1991 On August 13, 1990, the City Council approved a conditional use permit to sell used cars at 2720 Maplewood Drive for one year (See the conditions on page 6.) The owner is requesting that the Council renew the permit. (See the letter on page 5.) He is also applying for a used car license. DISCUSSION Mr: Yankovec has met all but one of the conditions for the conditional use permit. He does not have a City license to sell used cargo The license was applied for on July 24. He has been selling cars from the site. Mrs. Yankovec told me that she thought the condition on licensing meant a State license, which they have. The City, however, sent Mr. Yankovec a letter on June 11 reminding him that he n eeded a City license. (See the letter on page 7.) Both the associate planners have called after June 11 and reminded the Yankovecs about the need for a City license. Both planners specifically mentioned City license. RECOMMENDATION Approve the used car license and renew the conditional use permit at 2720 Maplewood.Drive for six months. If there are any further problems, staff shall bring the license and conditional use permit back to the Council fo termination. kr /memo 4 2 . mem (4-29) Att achments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3, Site Plan 4. Letter: Yankovec 5. 8 - 13 - 90 Council conditions 6. Letter: Ekstrand 37--- 2 69 VACNAIS HEIGHrS - 19 co RD "o" 8 0 3 = Fow,oR oP {� sr. � i ST. ✓O v � Vic• 1g etv 14 AV Q 60 qC5 on � Ge�rrbla� .� L a t e OHL A1AN Zj AV 3 N J Co R C W Ma J W ' 23 0 t W CCXR ij r Ilk' G � .� OE- MON� AV , L� i o (1) OONNOR AN g 4 .•' 22 W SE X TA 60 12 GFERVAIS AV Q ? 0 P LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 1 j 41 Total 8 -fogec ` Os � . NATIdNAI. BATTER BROADCASTING Co� 1'. a . . o iL / 8. a. CO. —" IMPORT ' i•18ac N � � L v t,0 Ql • 4V ti r v f �• � !� .� �• 17 ¢ 40 '. IM Q i 02 ^ . `7 _ Z , . 94ac P 4 E3.L i i 1 Hi ev 0 �4C PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N i 272.0 N. HIGHWAY 61 OWN. <N ai Q c ca 6 stalls °i r o� o Y (unpaved) y m used car office 3 stalls 4 stalls 4 stalls � Frontage Rd. HWY.61 C HWY.61 SITE PLAN N Attachment 3 Nbl I I •, , o s , � � • %Gcr-e 44 � -co QQ� �-cJ d7ao � . aAk Attachment 4 1 M 4 s ✓ ;;sy 7Cq OW JUL %Gcr-e 44 � -co QQ� �-cJ d7ao � . aAk Attachment 4 1 M 4 s ✓ ;;sy 7Cq 19 The planning coemnission discussed this application on July 16, 1990. They recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. 2. The City'Council held a public hearing on August 13, 1990. City staff published a notice.in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone.at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recoi=endations of the City staff and Planning comoaission. Now, THEREFCRa, Ba IT RLSOLVZD that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constru and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code, of ordinances. 2. The us* would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 39 The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive nofse, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. So The use vm 1d generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage.structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. Th use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8.. The use would maximise the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject.to the following conditions: 10 obtaining a license to sell used cars. 8 -13 -90 29 Cars for sale shall only be brought to the site for a sp &cif is buyer. There shall be no more than two cars for sale at any one time. 3o sleven parking spaces in front shall be striped and include one 12 -foot -wide handicap and ten 10- foot -wide spa c�a. 4o No overnight parkimg of cars for sale. 5. All vehicles being sold, except when on a test drive, shall be identified as being For Sale clearly. Seconded by Councilmemkor Carlson. byes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson and Rossbach. 6 Ways - Councilmanber Juker and zappa. Attachment 5 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6 0 560 June 11, 1991 Mr. Joseph Yankovec 1799 Edgerton Street Maplewood, MN 55117 USED CAR SALES - -2720 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE Our office recently received a copy of a letter sent to you by the Minnes Pollution Control Agency (see enclosure) regarding your selling used cars from 2720 Maplewood Drive. This is*a reminder that you must not sell cars from this address until you have your license from the City. Also, there must be 11 ten- foot-wide striped parking spaces out front with one 12-foot-wide handicap space. Call me at 770 -4563 if you have any questions. (:� P THOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER ji Encs: 1. Letter from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2. City Council conditions of approval ual rtunity Employer Attachment 6 �I� er p . 7 1 , AGENDA ITEM .AGENDA REPORT Ration 1r Cout�ai�.: TO: City Manager Badarss� FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce .Irish x° ", SUBJECT: Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87 -32- Change Order Two Da DATE:, August 5, 1991 Introduction Attached is a proposed change order in .the amount of $11,721.30. A resolution to approve the change order and revise project financing is also attached. Background The proposed ponding site on the Weaver School property at southeast corner of County Road B and the abandoned Burlington Northern railroad was deemed to be incompatible with the school by a special meeting of the PTA. Acquisition of the site was then dropped. Ponding on the tax- forfeit_ property on the northeast corner of County Road B and BN track .together with the use of the Previously granted ponding easement on the southwest corner of County Road B - and the BN tracks .was investigated and found to be equivalent. The major costs of the proposed change order are for sheeting to allow storm sewer construction in ` close proximity to the 20 -inch diameter high pressure gas main . which was not previously necessary with the original design. There is also a significant increase in the required quantity of fence because the ratio - of volume to perimeter of the revised two "smaller ponds is smaller than that of the one larger pond on the Weaver School site that was originally planned. The revised piping produces p number of additions and reductions to original contract quantities which are reflected on the proposed change order. Budget Impact The size of the. proposed change order can be absorbed by the existing . funding for project contingencies and indirect costs. No budget change is necessary. Recommendation It is recommended that authorization to approve Change Order Two be given. BAI jc Attachments RESOLUTION F CHANGE ORDER ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS 8 PLANNERS 3535 t/ADNAlS CENTER DRIVE, S7. P/1U4 MINNESOTA 55110. 612 490 -2000 OWNER. DATE City _ Project No. 87--32 OWNERS PROJECT NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. Footprint Lake Outlet _ _; . R 8 0 5 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEH FILE NO. The following changes shall be made to the contract documents Description: Replacement of Weaver School Pond with Sandhurst and Gladstone Ponds.. Relo -- cation of storm sewer along County Road B from Birmingham Street to g BN Railroad. See attachment for detail Plan uantit Chan quantity es g Purpose of Change Order: Easements for construction of a detention pond at Weaver School were not obtained. This resulted in the need to relocate the detention pond and storm sewer on the south side of County Road B. Basis of Cost: 0 Actual X0 Estimated Attachments (list supporting documents) Attachment No.. 1 Pond Relocation Change Order (2 a es p g ) CONTRACT STATUS Time Cost Original Contract $1 , 9-2 p r 9 9 5 7 Net Change Prior CO.'s 4 to 01. Change this C.O. +.11 x 7 21.3 0 Revised Contract Recommended for Approval: SHORT- EWOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC By Rocky J Yp4ehn , P . E . Agreed to by contractor: Approved for Owner. Progressive Contractors, Inc. City of Maplewood, MN BY t BY TITLE s BY Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative i SEH Once i SHORT ELLIOTT ST. PAUL, CHIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICIGON INC. MINNESOTA WISCONSIN ,» ATTACHMENT #1 POND RELOCATION CHANGE ORDER UNIT ORIGINAL CONT. DELETE ADDED. CONTRACT REVISED REVISED 'TOTAL PRICE QTY. QTY. DIF. COST TOTAL BID PLAN CHANGE PLAN PRICE' QTY. QTY. DIVISION I STORM SEWER .2101.5.02 CLEARING TREE 246 .30.00 32 111 79 2370.00 325 $9,750..00 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 246 30.00 32 101 69 2070.00 315 9450.00 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMEN S.Y. 23597 2.00 95 938 843 1686.00 24440 48880.00 2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWA S.Y. 2467 2.75 0 101 101 277.75 2568 7062.00 2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMEN. L.F. 4961 1.80 94 0 -94 - 169.20 4867 8760.60 2104.521 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE L.F. 1718 1.50 1461 0 -1461 •2191.50 257 385.50 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. 32890 2.90 23765 19186 -4579 - 13279.10 28311 82101.90 2105.535 SALVAGE TOPSOIL (LV) C.Y. 15180 3.70 3715 2551 -1164 - 4306.80 14016 51859.20 23310504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FORM TON 162.7 130.00 006 5.2 4.6 598.00 167.3 21749.00 2331.514 BASE* COURSE MIXTURE TON 3253 12.45 11.96 103 91.04 1133.45 1 334444 41633.30 2341.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR M TON 184.2 130.00 0.72 7 6028 816.40 190.48 24762.40 2341.508 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE TON 3070 .14.65 11.96 114 102.04 1494.89 3172.04 46470.39 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR T GAL 1245 1.05 4.72 48 43.28 45.44 1288.28 1352.69 *0452.600 TEMPORARY SHEETING S.F. 0 8.50 0 300 300 2550.00 300 2550.00 2501.515 12 RC PIPE APRON /W .TRASH EACH 2 465.00 0 2 2 930.00 4 1860.00 2501.515 15 RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH EACH 15 515.00 0 1 1 515.00 16 8240.00 2501.515 18 RC PIPE APRON /W TRASH EACH 2 555.00 1 0 -1 - 555.00 1 555.00 2501.515 24" RC PIPE APRON /W TRASH EACH 4 850.00 1 2 1 850.00 5 4250.00 2501.515 30 RC PIPE APRON /W TRASH EACH 2 1135.00 0 1 1 1135.00 , 3 3405.00 2501.515 36" RC PIPE APRON /W TRASH EACH 2 1405.00 1 0 -1 -1405.00 1 1405.00 2503.525 43-3 /4"SPAN RC PIPE-ARCH/ EACH 2 1300.00 1 0 -1 - 1300.00 1 1300.00 2503.521 43 -3/4 "SPAN RCP -ARCH CL I L.F. 834 52.00, .732 0 -732 - 38064.00 102 5304.00 2503.541 12" RCP.CL V L.F. 1290 16.00 0 53 .53 848.00 1343 21488.00 2503.541 15" RCP CL V L.F. 1674 19.50 0 26 26 .507.00 ! 1700 33150.00 2503.541 18" RCP CL II L.F. 59 20.00 16 0 -16 - 320.00 43 .860.00 2503.541 24" RCP CL II L.F. 208 21.60 9 0 -9 - 194.40 199 4298.40 2503.541 24" RCP CL III l.F. 815 24.20 0 25 25 840 20328.00 2503.541 24" RCP CL IV L.F. 764 33.00 538 810 272 . 605.00 8976.00 1036 34188.00 2503.541 2411 RCP CL V L.F. 586 31.70 0 114 114 3613.80 700 22190.00 2503.541 30" RCP CL II L.F. 14 29.00 0 153 153 4437.00 167 4843.00 25030541 36 RCP CL II L.F. 982 .29.00 224 0 -2.24 - 6496.00 758 21982.00 2503.541.36" RCP CL III L.F. 1300 40.00 0 363. 363 14520.00 1663 66520.00 2503.541 36 1 I . RCP CL V L.F. 140 62.55 134 0 -134 - 8381.70 6 375.30 . 2503.541 42 RCP CL V L.F. 922 82.80 539 750 211 17470.80 1133 93812.40 2503.541 48 RCP CL IV L.F. 1.53 83.00 18 0 -18 - 1494.00 135 11205.00 r 2506.506 CONST MH, DESIGN A L.F. 65.3 1.00.00 22.8 17.8 -5 - 500.00 60.3. 6030.00 25066506 CONST MH, DESIGN B L.F. 66.59 130.00 0 43 43 5590.00 109.59 14246.70 2506.506 CONST MH, DESIGN C L.F. 156.84 170.00 11.26 0 - 11.26. - 1914.20 145.58 24748.60 2506.506 CONST MH, DESIGN D L.F. 235.22 205.00 .40.58 44.1 3.52 721.60 , 238.74 48941.70 2506.506 CONST MH, DESIGN C -.2 L.F. 21.96 210.00 0 15.1 15.1 3171.00 .37.06 7782.60 2506.506 CONST MH, DESIGN D-2 L.F. 13.64 275.00 8.68 0 . -8.68 - 2387.00 4.96 1364.00 ATTACHMENT #1 POND RELOCATION CHANGE ORDER 2506.506 CONST MH,. DESIGN E -1 L.F. 29.48 125.00 .0 3.5 3.5 437.50 32.98 4122.50 2506.516 CASTING TYPE R-4342 EACH 21 115.00 2 3 1 115.00 22 2530.00 2506.516 CASTING TYPE R EACH 51 .140000 6 8 2 280.00 53 7420.00 2506.516 CASTING TYPE R-2565C EACH 1 6 260.00 1 2 1 260000 7 1820,00 2511.501 RANDON RIPRAP, CL II C.Y. 105 30.00 b.6. 0 -6.6 - 198.00 � 98:4 2952.00 2511.501 RANDON RIPRAP, CL III C.Y. 64.1 35.00 11 17.4 6.4 224.00 70.5 2467.50 2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE I S.Y. 591.1 6.00 58 45 -13 -78.00 578.1 3468.60 2557.517 VEHICULAR GATE EACH 1 625.00 1 3 2 1250.00 3 1875.00 557.601 INSTALL SALVAGED CHAIN LI L.F. 1718 1050 1328 0 -1328 - 1992.00 390 585.00 577.602 FURNISH AND INSTALL 6 CH L.F. 533 9.31 533 2360 1827 17009.37 2360 21971.60 2575.502 SEED MIXTURE 6 LB.. 957.74 4.00. .182.8 59.7 -123.1 - 492.40 834.64 3338.56 2575.505 SODDING TYPE A S.Y. 44137 1.75 360 150 -210 - 367.50 f 43927 76872.25 2575.511 MULCH MATERIAL, TYPE 1 TON 39.07 210.00 4.87 1.59 -3.28 - 688.80 35.79 7515.90 2575.519 DISK ANCHORING ACRE 13.44 60.00 2.43 0.8 -1.63 -97.80 11.81 708.60 2575.523 COMMERCIAL FERT. ANALYSIS TON 3.28 350.00 006. 0.21 -0.39 - 136.50 2.89 1011.50 2575.523 WOOD FIBER BLANKET S.Y. 347 1.00 311 0 -311 = 3110'00 36� 36.00 STORM COST. CHANGE $9,188.10 DIVISION II - SANITARY SEWER I 0256.601 8" PVC SEWER PIPE -10 L.F. 247 9.30 0 174 174 1618.20 421 3915.30 0256.602 STANDARD MH, 0 -8 DEEP EACH 16 1100.00 0 1 1 1100.00 + 17 18700.00 0256.602 CUT IN 8 "X6" PVC WYE EACH 7 250.00 1 0 -1 - 250.00 6 1500.00 0256.602 8 "X6" PVC WYE EACH 39 65.00 0 1 1 65.00 40 2600,00 SAN. COST CHANGE 52,533.20 * NO UNIT PRICE IN ORIGINAL CONTRACT TOTAL, COST CHANGE 511,721.30 s -y MEMORANDUM TO FROM SUBJECT: LOCATION APPLICANT: OWNER: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner sign Review 2720 Stillwater Road Knowlan's.Supermarkets, Gramer Partners July 19, 1991 by L/ouncii:L s ridorsiad,...... Nod1 led,,,,,,., ..,.�.,. Date Inc. (Vern Thraen) Knowlan's Supermarkets is requesting that the Council change the sign plan for the shopping center. The change would add a four- foot by.eight -foot reader board on the east wall. (See the plan on page 5.) It is. now a portable sign on wheels. The sin Tan g p. for the building does not include this sign. City Code requires that the Council approve all changes to a shopping center sign plan. BACKGROUND Approved Sian criteria On March 1, 1979, the City Council approved the sign plan for this building, subject to seven conditions. (See page 6.) The conditions have been met,, except for number. five. The Centur Laundromat sign has not been removed. The Northwood Hardware sign is now Northland Golf. It has also not been removed. Current Signs and Their Status Legal Signs (signs that the City has issued permits for since the Council adopted the sign code in 1977) 1. The ground.sign along Stillwater Road. 20 The white- lettered signs on the mansard roof. Nonconforming Signs (signs put up before 1977 that do not meet the present sign code) : 10 "Northland Golf" roof sign. 2. "Northland Golf" wall sign on the store front. 3. "Northland Golf" wall sign on the east elevation. 4. "Century Laundromat" wall sign on the east elevation. 5. "Century Laundromat" ground sign along Century Avenue. 6. "Appliance Specialists". wall sign on.the store front. Illegal Signs (signs put up after 1977 without a permit): 1. "Appliance Specialists" wall sign on the east elevation. 2. "Knowlan's Bakery - Deli" wall sign on the rear elevation. 3. "Century Vacuum" wall sign on the east elevation. DISCUSSION Existincf Building Si_ans City Code requires that the owner or tenant remove all nonconforming signs ten years after their installation. All of the nonconforming signs have been up for more than ten ears. City staff will notif the ow Y y owners o f the for more and illegal signs.that they must remove these s sign unless the Cit roves t g� Counc a Y pp hem as part of the building's sign plan. Removing the nonconforming signs will improve the appearance P Pp nce of the east wall. These signs look cluttered and are no t art of uniform sign p tan P a The Council should approve, as part of the sign Ian two of th g p e illegal signs - the Century Vacuum and the Knowlan's s Bakery Deli signs. The Century Vacum sign is similar in style to the he approved signs on the front mansard. The Knowlan's Bakery-Deli sign is in good condition and looks a ro ' w all. pp priate on the -south Proposed Knowlan's Reader Board Sign The Council should not approve the reader board sign. The reader der board would look like a portable sign mounted on a wall. The applicant should work with the other tenants ' and the building owner to create a neat, attractive and uniform sign plan for the east wall. RECOMMENDATION 10 Approve a change to the 1979 sign.plan for Knowlan's shopping center. This change would include th g the Century vacuum sign on the east wall and the Knowlan's Bakery. Deli sign on the south wall. 20 Deny the proposed wall- mounted reader board sign for Knowlan's supermarket. Denial is because the sign would not meet the intent of the code, which is for shopping cente pp g rs to have newt, at tractive and uniform signage. te\knowlans.mem (section 25) Attachments 10 Location Map 2, 3. Proposed sign 40 Property Line / Zoning Map March 1, 1979 Council approval 6 D r Bd'4kB/ 0 0 0� O / W J GA SE AV o P 32 32 s 3 LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 49 t- IOU. it ,, ,� I ` P►v�' ,� 1 VP Lp Lyle /54 4� I 7 . 1 • I ' •, / +3 \ O 1 \ n 1_�•'� 1�� '•S _� it j.: �,.' \ \ � .. p •.� � ............ fl 7 ^ rim La •• ::.•.. AN • \ \ A • 1 ...... p► �. �, y 5► \ 6 \ 1077 ) I . / \ \ '6 w r y •. \ \ T 1059 ,0 't ` r \ G, L� c Jj ' �• ' \ \ r•ir ter• • `.1 .1 0 0 . Cr . N \F� \ ,5 , ) \f, v 1047 �. Z16 z .. . W J l • La Ed M ON - V 14 , 103 a ta umu 12 7 : z, Z 1029 25 • r r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 Q N 5VuTn Z1jriV4wxjLun NORTHLAND GOLF ROOF SIGN �NDcvLA/ S . 'ej posco s16 Ad si r�l 11111111'-4 X OC PROPOSED SIGN EAST ELEVATION i - NORTHLAND GOLF WALL SIGNS r $.�R �A �.or� le-,)j a Stf0 1 A)5 El P � 1 I I � APPLIANCE SPECIALISTS NORTH ELEVATION WALL SIGN PROPOSED SIGN 5 Attachment 3 � ,* � � It / �6 Xt 2 • Knowlans Sign Plan a. Manager Evans p resented. the staff report recommending approval subject g pp to the following conditions 1. The Knowlan's Mansard sign and logo shall measure 3 feet an • d 5.5 feet In height respectively, as proposed; 2. The Comet Realty sign shall be removed from the fascia and located on the mansard to conform in size with the other mansard signs (except the Knowlan's sing) ID 3. The mansard signs for the laundromat, barber shop, ardware p, store, and realtor shawl not exceed one foot in letter height; 4. The concrete block roof sign shall be ainted off within four our years of this approval as required by code, or at that time the applicant may petition the City Council to approve it as a legal roof sign; 5. The "Lawnboy Equipment" sign, the "Century aundromat" sign " Y sign, and the North wood Hardware" sign, which are Located on the building's easterly elevation shall be removed,.since they are illegal non - conforming signs; 60 The projecting sign indicating Curtis Cabinets new location shall be removed; 7. owner and Applicant agree to the above conditions in writing, Ling. b., Chairman Huot presented the following onimuni ation: g ty Design Review Board recommend - "Board Member S j olander moved the � Board recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed sign plan presented b Lawrence Si - • ditions: Y Signs subject to the following con- 1. The Knowlan's mansard sign and logo shall measure 3 feet for the letter height and 5.5 feet for the logo height; 2. The Comet Realty and Northwood Hardward Store sign shall the fascia; g be removed from 3. The mansard signs for the laundromat barber sho h p, ardware tore, and realtor shall not exceed one foot in letter height and be consistent in letter height; ' 4. The concrete block roof sign shall be ainted o ' p off within four years of this approval as required by Code; 5 The "Lawnboy Equipment" sin the "Century '� sign, " y Laundromat sign and the "North- wood Hardware" sign, which are located on the building's g easterly elevation, shall be removed, since they are illegal non-conforming 6. The projecting sign indicating Curti g g s Cabinets new location shall be' removed; 7• Owner and applicant agree to the above conditions in writing, g Board Member Herauf seconded. Ayes all." c. The applicants were not in attendance at the meeting. g d. Councilman Wiegert moved to a prove the Knowlan sin lan sub' ec t to the re- commendations and conditions of the Community Design Review Board Seconded by Councilman Fontaine. Ayes - all. 6 Attachment 4 MINUTES OF,THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 01830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JULY 23 1. CALL TO ORDER Bo Holder, at 7:07 pm. 2, ROLL CALL Dona Moe Marvin Erickson Michael Holder Marie Robinson Bruce Thompson Scott Wasiluk- 3, APPROVAL OF MINUTES a . Jul 9 1991 actin chairperson, ,.called the meetin to order Msent sent e ..P es P sent A Pre ant Boardmember Wasil.k moved a lp s _' - 1991, as submi tt do Boardmember RolbFinson seconded 4* APPROVAL OF AGE&DA roval of the minutes of Jul 9, A Wasiluk Abstentions- -Holder Boardmember as i mended a deletin *luk moved approval of t e a Boardmember Lube, 2829 White Bear enue e� e a item 6 b * ,, at the re of the applicant. Boardmem er'Robinson • seconded A lder Robinson, Wasiluk 5, UNFINISHED BUSINESS a.. Si Plan Reconsideration - Knowlan's Supermarket,, 2720 Stillwater Road The staff report was presented and -discussed, Vern Thraen was present representin Knowlan's. Mr. Thraen feels the wall-mounted reader board si is attractive and would i like t 1 approved. Mr. Thraen said he has not y et met with the other tenants of the center to develop a si plan for the buildin Boardmember Robinson moved: (1} Approval of a chan to the 1979 si plan for Knowlan's shoppin center. This chan would include the Centur Vacuum si on the east wall and the Knowlan's Baker si on the south wall. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes 7 -23 -91 (2) Denial of the proposed wall - mounted reader board sign for Knowlan's Supermarket. Denial is because the sign would not meet the 'Intent of the code, which is for shopping centers to have neat, attractive, and uniform signage. (3) Action should be taken to remove all other signs listed as illegal and nonconforming. The motion died for lack of a second. The Board discussed whether removal of the arrow on the sign would make it acceptable. The consensus of the Board was that there is a need for the tenants to submit a sign plan for the Board's review. Boardmember Robinson moved: .at (1) Approval of a change to the 1979 sign plan for Knowlan's ,shopping center. This change would include the Century Vacuum sign on the east wall and the Knowlan's Bakery-Deli sign on the south wall. (2) Denial of the proposed wall - mounted reader board sign for Knowlan's Supermarket. Denial is because the sign would not meet the intent of the code, which is for shopping centers to have neat, attractive, and uniform signage. (3) Action should be taken to remove all other signs listed as illegal and nonconforming. Boardmember Wasiluk seconded Ayes -- Molder, Robinson, Wasiluk 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Sign Plan Revis - Maplerid e Shopping Center, 2515 White Bear Avenue. Tim Keane of Grif V'nDa" t Property Management Company, 7900 Xerxes Avenue, Bln, explained his request for a revision to the sign plan M:apler.dge Shopping Center to allow a larger sign than eri allows for the Fasic Bug. The Board discus ed th size of other tenant signs in the center and what the s' n crite is will allow. Boardmember ,'obinson moved denial of the proposed four- foot -tall wall sign for the Fashion Bug at the Mapleridge Shoppin g Center, since: AGENDA ITEM J .AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Sadore,.�. TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce. Irish- Data �'""i"" "" ~----- SUBJECT: Sterling Street and Schaller Drive, Project 87- 45- Schedule Public Hearing. DATE: August 5, 1991 Introduction The feasibility study for the subject project is presented. This report summarizes the propgsed financing of the project. A resolution to accept the feasibility report schedule a public hearing is attached. Background This project was ordered in 1987. At that time District 622 was planning to construct an elementary school bounded by Sterling, Schaller, and Highwood. The design of Schaller Drive was predicated on the proposed school site. The property owner, Mr. James Kayser, objected to the design in That it decreased the number of lots that could be built in the balance of the subdivision. The school district and the city were to have jointly condemned the property for the school site and roadways. The. resolve to build the school faltered and .changed. The previous approvals expired and the project died. Subsequently, Mr. Kayser has had a preliminary plat .. approved. This presentation of the project conforms with the preliminary plat Mr. Kayser has stated that he will furnish required right -of -way and easements to the city at no cost provided that the other affected landowners do similarly. - There are several other changes - in this presentation of the project beyond the changed Schaller Drive alignment. The design of Sterling Street was previously proposed to be 36- feet wide street section with afive -feet wide concrete sidewalk. It is now proposed to be 40 feet wide with no sidewalk. The 40- feet -wide street would have a 12 -feet wide driving lane in each direction, a striped ten -feet wide parking lane on one side, a striped eight -feet wide shoulder area on the other side with no parking permitted. The substitution of an eight -feet wide striped shoulder in lieu of the detached five -feet wide sidewalk is seen more appropriate for several reasons. First, the school site has been dropped. Secondly, it is difficult to avoid damage to sidewalk when it is installed prior to house construction. Finally, the city does not have equipment or people to provide for Project 87 -45 2 August 5 1991 plowing and other maintenance. It seems inequitable to attempt to require the abutting property owners to provide this maintenance for a facility that provides a city-wide or neighborhood benefit. The - prior intent to extend water main on Linwood east of .Sterling to Century has been drop ped. Unless sanitary sewer is similarly extended, the water main extension does not allow for subdivision. Hence, the assessment for water main does not allow for cost recovery until some future date and is more of a burden than a benefit. The previous project approval did not .include linking all of the storm water - ponds in the watershed together. It was intended that these trunk storm sewers between ponds be installed through the development process. In view of the facts that all property in the tributary watershed is proposed. to be assessed for storm sewer and that relying: on the subdivision process sometimes results in problems 'due to development in an order contrpry to that planned, it is proposed to connect all storm water ponds with trunk storm. sewers. The developers can then extend lateral storm sewers into the ponds - at their expense in a straight- forward manner. The trunk sanitary sewer, .trunk storm sewer, and collector streets to be built with this project will facilitate development in an orderly appropriate manner. The major benefit for the existing property owners remains the installation of 16 -.inch and 12 -inch_ diameter trunk water main from the elevated storage tank north of Linwood Avenue to Highwood Avenue. When it became apparent that the right -of -way issues could not be resolved, changes were made in the water distribution system to convey water with pressure boostedby the Mailand Road pump station to Highwood Avenue. Individual pressure - reducing valves were installed in 110 homes in the lower areas adjacent to McKnight between Linwood and Highwood to allow the existing main on McKnight Road to be used as a boosted. pressure transmission main. As an aside, it should be noted that Walter Geissler, senior engineering technician, did an excellent job of working with these residents and the plumber to provide an interim solution to the extreme low' pressure problem at the higher elevations along Highwood. The installation of PRV and use of the McKnight Road main is viewed as interim since a break in the water main anywhere from Dorland and Hillwood Drive would put all water main as for south as Snowshoe Lane out of service. This could have serious public health and safety ramifications. A redundant water main should be provided. Budget Impact The total project cost is $1,814,000.00. Of this amount, $634,510.00 is eligible for MSA funding. Project 87 -45 3 August 5, 1991 A preliminary assessment roll has been prepared based on the assessment rate policy that was part of the City Project 90 -07 public hearing that have been increased by fivepercent for inflation. These standard assessments are: .Storm sewer $525.00 /residential lot Sanitary sewer service $550.00 /residential lot Water service $550.00 /residential lot The costs for water and .sewer main are at essentially the same rate as Project 90 -07 ($35.00 per front foot) with a five percent cost escalation factor. The unit charge is not proposed to be used because this is new construction not subject to the wide diversity of lot sizes in other established areas and it is not seen - why the city should subsidize any of the development cost. ' The street construction . assessment for MSA street (Sterling Street) is to be the some rate as used for new construction as part of the Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to County Road D project ($36.50 /front foot) times a five percent multiplier which gives $38.50 per front foot. Local street construction (Schaller Drive) is proposed to be fully assessed to the property owner at $55.00 per. front foot. These rates are applied fio all property generally within the boundary - shown on the attached figure for storm water purposes. Property abutting new streets is to be assessed for streets and utilities. These rates generate on assessment recover of s $1,348,549.5.0. This assessment recover generates an excess MSA funding of $1 b9,000.00 that has customarily been allocated to the MSA street construction - fund. Recommendation i It is recommended that the attached resolution to schedule a public hearing be adopted. BAI jc Attachments RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING. WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Sterling Street,, Schaller Drive, and Hillwood Drive, City Project 87 -45, by construction of bituminous street with curb'. and gutter, storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY. COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: F 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed •' ' improvement on Sterling Street, Schaller Drive,. and Hillwood Drive, City Project 87 -45 by construction of bituminous street with curb and gutter, storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2,. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of - the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,814,000.00 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers . of the hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 9th day of September, - 1991, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. cr Poor o � av �. DAY 0 U1fZ`- � 120 IlC gT � o� a (�) O � i) � (1) F'O ry p a v . d E � n I N 0 a � ,ay � O DAY �o o Wa ILA NO RD �[ CIR a 0 � � Vltly p O Q � � N N / //l v CJ Pk TEAK- W TEA)( WOOD DR w0 0 0 CT: OAK- � 'fit I�pp � p C;q E � a r F 0 a H I L l w000 o cc ' z2 Q 2 L'N Q) D av 72 O Q). CT OORLAND Al In Pk cc t- TIMBER � P 6 E g C � L, N � � $0 VAI..�- �• (3) VIEW AV �w N M I 0 Ffi1'ti''040 �i A � 74 cc 74 ... Ia A h11 E ° E A j a' • �� NAM - rT_z ''•. � SOUTH � GENERAL HEARING AREA � PROJECT 87 -45 I 8TERLINO /BCHALLER DRIVE SCALE IMPROVEMENT N/A PAGE 1 OF 2 D/ P N0. 6159 07 -30- 199i PROJECT NO. 87 -45 STERL /SCHALLER IMP. PROJECT SUMMARY SEC - 1 2 — T- 28 - R--- 28 -00-31 17 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER *********0w000 FF AT ***$36.'75.0 EA. SAN SERVICE * * ** * * *0. 000 EA AT **t550.000 EA. = ** **** *$0.00 WATER MAIN * * * * * * * *0. 000 FF AT* *36.750 EA. WATER SERVICE *0. 0 EA AT **$5500000 EA. STORM SEWER * * * * * * * *30. 000 UNIT AT **$525,000 EA. $ 15, 750. 00 STREET MSA *********0 FF AT ***$38, EA. STREET LOCAL FF AT * * *$55.000 EA. SEC 12 T - 28 -Rw- - 1212-34 .38 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAKI SEWER 1, 922a 000 FF AT ** *$36.750 EA. . 50 SAN SERVICE * * * * * * ** 17.00O EA AT * *$550.000 EA. _ * * 9 350 v 00 WATER MAIN * * * ** 1 j 9`2v 000 FF AT ***$36.750 EA. = * *$70, 633. 50 WATER SERVICE ********17,000 EA AT **' $550. 000 EA. _ * * *$9 350.00 STORM SEWER * * * * * * * *.51. 000 UNIT AT **$525-000 EA. = **$264775.00 STREET MSA * * * *1 165. 000 FF AT ** *$38.500 EA. _ **$44 852. 50 STREET LOCAL * * * * * * * * *0. 000 FF AT * * *$55. 000 EA. SEC- 12-- T- 28-4-- QQ -43 .1 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY. PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER *****1 FF AT * * *�36. 750 EA. = * *$51 450, 00 s SAN SERVICE ********151000 EA AT .*x-$550. 000 EA. _ * * *$8 x::50.00 WATER MAIN *****1 FF AT ** *$36. EA. = **$51,450.00 WATER SERVICE * * * * * * ** 15.000 EA AT * *$550.000 EA. = ***$8, :STORM SEWER * * * * * ** *52.000 UNIT AT **$525.000 EA. _ **$27,300.00 STREET MSA * * ** 1 400.000 FF AT ***$38,500 EA. _ *x *$53 STREET LOCAL * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$55.000 EA. _ * * ** *0.00 SEC- -13- T- 28- R- 22 -OU -1C 1 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT ----------- SAN SEWER *****4 FF AT ***$36..750 EA. _ *$152 SAN SERVICE * ** * * ** *41. 000 EA AT * *$550.000 . EA. _ **$22 9 55 5 0.00 WATER MAIN *****4 FF AT ***$36.750 EA. _ *$152, 880. 00 WATER SERVICE * * * * * ** *41. 000 EA AT **$550.000 EA. 550. 00 STORM SEWER *******141,000 UNIT AT ** 525. 000 EA. _ * X74, 0►�5. 00 STREET MSA . * * * ** 1, 810. 000 FF AT * * *$38. 500 EA. - * *$69 685. 00 STREET LOCAL *****2 FF AT * **$55. 000 EA. = *$115 500. 00 PAGE 2 OF 2 D/P N0. 6159 07-30-1991 PROJECT.NO. 87--45 STERL /SCHALLER IMP. PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- 13 B- R- -C2 —QQ -135 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER * * * * ** *250.000 FF AT ** *$36.750 EA. = * ** $9, 187. SO SAN SERVICE * * * * * * ** *3.000 EA AT * *$550. 000 EA. _ * ** 1 650.00 WATER MAIN * * ** * * *2 50. 000 FF AT ** *$36 - .750 EA. = � * *�9 18`'. 5�► WATER SERVICE EA AT **$5501.000 EA. _ ***$l, 6 00 STORM SEWER �� *� * ** *27.000 UNIT AT * *$525m 000 EA. = *� ! _ . 00 �, X14, 175 STREET LISA * * * * ** *250.000 FF AT ** *$38.500 EA. 6L5.00 STREET LOCAL * * *a * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *55.000 EA. SEC - 13�- - T-- 28 -R-- 22--00 -21 1 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER * ** 1, 830. 000 FF AT * ** 5 �s6. 7�0 EA. **$69 SAN SERVICE **'******18 EA AT **$550.000 EA. _ ***$9 9�c�0, 00 WATER MAIN . *****1 FF AT * * *$36. 750 EA. = **$69,090,00 WATER SERVICE * *. * * * * ** 18. 000 EA AT **$550,000 EA. _ * * *$9 900. 00 STORM SEWER UNIT AT .**$525,000 EA. _ * *$.14 700►. 00 STREET MSA * * * ** 1, 88th. 000 FF AT * * *$38. 500 EA. _ * *$72 380. 00 STREET LOCAL- * * * * * *. X00 FF AT ***$55,000 EA. GRAND TOTALS 83 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER *****9 FF AT ** *$36.750 EA. _ _------ ---rte_- *$353 241.00 SAN SERVICE * *. * * * ** *94.000. EA AT *. *$550.000 EA. _ **$51,700, 00 WATER . MA * * * * *9, 612.000 FF AT **x$36.750 EA. _ *$353 WATER SERVICE ********94 8 EA AT *, *$550.000 EA. _ * *$51 700.00 STORM SEWER * * * * ** *329.000 UNIT AT **$525.000 EAR =172 7 725.00 STREET MSA *****6 FF AT ** *$38.500 EA. _ *$250 442.50 STREET LOCAL *****29100.000 FF AT *55.000 EA. _ *$115 00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS P OJECT = $ 1, 348, 549.50 PROJECT NO. 87-45 STERUSCHAL.LER IMP. PAGE OF 2 07- 30--1991 D/P NO. 6159 WMG PUBLIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1 ? = SAN SEWER - FF COL. 2) = SAN SERVICE - EA COLIN 31 = WATER VAIN - FF COL. 4) = WATER SERVICE - EA COL. 51 = STORM SEWER - UNIT COL. 61 = STREET MSA - FF COL. 7 y = STREET LOCAL - FF PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL. 6 COL, 7 12- 28 -22 -31 -0001 0.00 0600 0.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0047 0.00 0.00 0.08 .0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28--22 -31 -0048 0.00. 0.00 0.00 8.00 1800 0.00 0.00 12.28 -22 -31 -0049 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0050 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 .12- 28- 22 -31- 0052 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.10 12 -2.8- 22-31 -0053 0.00 .0100 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0054 0000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100 Q►. @0 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0055 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0058 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 1100 .0.00 0. @0 , 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0059 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0900 0.00 12- 28- 22- 31.0060 0100 .0600 0. Q►0 09 00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0061 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0062 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0063 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0064 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0065 0.00 .0100 0.00. 0.00 1.00 0800 0.00 12- 28 -22- 34-0003 155.00 2.00 155.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0004 175.00 2.00 175.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0006 60.00 1.00 60.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0011 146.00 1100 146.80 .1100 1.00 0.00 0.00 12 -28- 22-34 -0012 124.00 1.00 124.00 1100 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0016 0.00 0.00 0. R0 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 i 12- 28 -22 -34 -0017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0018 0.00 0000 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0019 0.00 0800 0000 0.00 1100 0.00 o.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0022 511.00 100 511.00 3.00 3100 511.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0023 0000 0.00 0000 0. eo 12- 28 -22 -34 -0024 0.00 0.00 0100 0.60 i . 00 0.00 0.00 12- 28- 22- 34-0025 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0026 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12 -28- 22--34 -0027 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 @. 00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0028 0.00 @. 00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0029 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0100 12- 28 -22 -34 -0030 0100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0031 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0032 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0033 0.00 0.00 0100 0100 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0034 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0035 0.00 0.00 .0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 .0-00. 12- 28 -22 -34 -0036 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i . 00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0038 0.00 0. @0 .0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28- 22- 34 -0039 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0040 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28- 22--34 -0041 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0042 0.00 0100 0.00 of 00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0043 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0044 0.00 00.00 0000 0000 1100 0.00 0 00 PROJECT NO. 87 -45 STERL /SCHALLER IMP. PAGE 2 OF 2 07 -30 -1991 U/P NO. 6159 WMG PUBLIC HEARING ., QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1 ) = SAN SEWER - FF COL. 2) - SAN SERVICE - EA COL. 3) = WATER MAIN - FF COL. 4) = WATER SERVICE - EA COL. 5) = STORM SEWER - UNIT COL. 6) = STREET MSA - FF COL. 7) = STREET LOCAL - FF PIN N04 COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 COL 6 COL 7 12- 28 -22 -34 -0045 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0046 0,0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12--28 -22-34 -0047 0800 0400 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12 -28- 22--34 -0048 .0100 0.00 0.00 0100 1000 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0049 0.00 0.00 0400 0.00 1900 0.00 12- 28 -22 -34 -0050 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 12- 28 -22- 34--0052 751.00 7.00 751.00 7.00 10.00 654.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -43 -0002 1400.00 15.00 1400.00 15.00 52.00 1400.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -12 -0008 4160.00 41.00 4160.00 41.00 141. @0 1810.00 21001 00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0056 0.00 0.00 0.00 030 1.00 0.00 .. 0.00 13 -28- 22--13 -0057 0800 0.00 8.00 0.00 '1100 01-00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0058 0.00 oleo 0100 0.00 1100 0800 0.00 13 -28 -22-13 -0059 0.00 0.00 . 0100 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 13- 28- 22-13- 0060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0061 0.00 0.00. 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13--28 -22 -13 -0062 0.00 0800 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0063 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0064 0100 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0065 0900 0.00 8.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0066 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0067 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0068 0.00 0100 0.00 0.00 1900 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0069 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 1000 0.00 .0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0070 0800 0.00 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0071 0.00 0.00 8.00 0100 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28- 22- 13-0070 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13-28- 22--13 -0073 0.00 0.00 0.00 0, 00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0074 0.00 0.00 0.00 0100 1.00 0.00 13--28 -22-13 -0075 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22- 13-0076 0.00 0.00 0. @0 0.00 1100 13- 28 -22 -13 -0077 0100 0.00 0800 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0078 0.00 0.00 040 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0079 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .1.00 0.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -13 -0080 250400 3100 250.00 3.00 3.00 250.00 0.00 13- 28 -22 -21 -0001 1880000 18.00 1888.00 18.00 28.00 1880.00 0.00 GRAND ' TOTALS 9612.00 94.00 9512.00 94.00 329.00 6505.00 2100.00 AGENDA NO. —' 6 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: DATE: CONTRACT FOR AUDITING SERVICES August 2, 1991 INTRODUCTION kotican bir Comoll anaorsed— pei Goted�.�„„�„ �... Date It is proposed (1) that the contract for auditing services be renewed with Peat Marwick for five years, (2) that this firm be retained to audit the financial statements of the fire departments for the year ending 12 -31 -91 and (3) that the appropriate 1991 budget adjustments be made. BACKGROUND The Cites current five -year contract for auditing services with Peat Marwick has expired. Consequently, this fine submitted the attached proposal (Exhibit A) for a new five -year contract. In addition, they submitted a second proposal (Exhibit B) for the audit of the financial statements for the three independent corporations that provide fire fighting services for the City. Peat Marwick has provided satisfactor auditing • ry services to the City or the past e' � p fight years. Their initial contract was the result of a proposal the submitted • ro y * in 1983. At that time, the City reviewed the prop osals from six firms and C i t y staff intervi • fi tY ewed representatives of each rm. Whe this contract expired in 1986 r0 os p p als were requested from three firms an Marwick was selected as the best o d Peat op tion for a five -year contract. Each time Pe have not been at Marwick has been selected they n the lowest cost option because the lower r cost firms have not been as well q Also, Peat Marwick is one of the larg gest firms in the country. According to a study by Professor Earl R. Wilson of the University of Missouri there ' her bond rating s/lower � ere is a strong relationship between higher gs /lower bond interest costs and cities th audited by the largest audit firms in th e country at are . To determine if the prices charged by Peat Marwick are reasonable, I contacted four cities that have a population comparable to Maplewood. The following is the information I obtained: CITY 1990 POP. 1990 AUDIT BILL Apple Valley 34,598 $40 Roseville 33,485 12,650 Maplewood 30,954 16,600 Brooklyn Center 28,887 22,000 Fridley 28,335 16,300 AUDIT FIRM Ernst & Young Eide Helmeke & Co. Peat Marwick Deloitte & Touche Tautges, Redpath & Co. The audit bill for Apple Valley is much higher than the other cities listed because their auditors rather than City staff prepare most year -end work a ers and the financial statements. p p The Roseville audit bill is smaller than the other cities listed because their audit is done by a small regional firm. Based upon the preceding comparison with other cities, the proposed Peat Marwick 1991 -1995 audit fees listed in Exhibit A are reasonable. Peat Marwick is also well - qualified to audit the financial statements of the fire departments. p On August 27, 1990, the City Council approved a consultant contract with Peat Marwick to provide recommendations on accounting procedures used b the fire departments. Their Y p recommendations were contained in a report dated March, 1991 which was reviewed and accepted by the fire departments and City Council. During the preparation of this rep the p � Y developed a good working relationship with fire department personnel and obtained information that will help them audit the financial statements. The 1991 Budget did not anticipate any billings in 1991 for the fire department audit. However, the Peat Marwick proposal (Exhibit B) indicates that $1,000 of audit work would be done in 1991. Therefore, a $1,000 budget transfer from the General Fund contingency account is needed. ALTERNATIVES 1. Approve afive -year contract with Peat Marwick for the audit of City financial records. 2. Request proposals from several audit firms for the audit of City financial records. 3. Approve a one -year contract with Peat Marwick for the audit of the 1991 financial statements of the fire departments. 4. Request proposals from several audit firms for the audit of the 1991 financial statements of the fire departments. DISCUSSION The first alternative would be the least disruptive. When a chap a is made in auditing firms g g a great deal of extra time is required by City staff to explain the City's accounting procedures gp and systems to new auditors. The fees proposed by Peat Marwick are reasonable and the have provided satisfactory services. Also, they rotate personnel assigned to do our audit in order to bring us new ideas and a "fresh" perspective. The contract with Peat Marwick can be cancelled at any time if their services become inadequate. The second alternative would require significant staff time to prepare a q gm p p Request for Proposals, review proposals received, interview representatives of firms submitting ro proposals and check references. There is a small possibility of savin g Y mone with this alternative. The third alternative would allow Peat Marwick to continue the working relationship that g p they have with fire department personnel and maintain continuity. The first audit of the fire departments is a critical step forward in the City's relationship with the fire departments. A . p p change of auditing firms at this point would be disruptive. The fourth alternative would have the same disadvantages as the second alternative. In . g addition, it would be further complicated by the fact that the auditing irms which are g requested to submit proposals for the audit of the fire departments would want to meet with representatives of each department to review their accounting systems. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended (1) that the contract for auditing services be renewed with Peat Marwick for five years, (2) that this firm be retained to audit the financial statements of the fire departments for the year ending 12 -31 -91 and (3) that the appropriate 1991 budget adjustments be made. tmc Attachments Z 1 � l1 Peat Marwick Certified Public Accountants 4200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone 612 341 2222 EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 OF 2 Telecopier 612 341 0202 Ma 2, 1991 Mr. Dan Faust Finance Director Cit of Maplewood 1830 East Count Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Dan: We are pleased to provide y ou with some additional information with respect to our continuin to provide professional services to the Cit of Maplewood as of and for the y ear endin December 31, 1991 and for annual periods endin December 31, thereafter. We believe we are q ualified to continue servin the professional needs of the Cit for the followin reasons. • We have had the pleasure of servin y ou for the past y ears, and durin that time have developed a ver g ood understandin of y our operations and have worked with y ou on a variet of accountin and mana consultin matters. • As a lar international firm, KPMG Peat Marwick has substantial experience auditin or similar to y ours. Our national specialized practice in g overnment or provides guidance to local offices and is available as a resource on an as needed basis. • The personnel assi to the en serve man t of g overnment or in the Twin Cities area. • We will provide constructive comments relatin to the accountin s and business environment of the Cit in a letter after the completion of the audit. Because we audit or similar to y ours, we are able to provide recommendations which we believe enhance the present accountin s • We have provided timel information throu letters and publications on such issues as arbitra federal funds, leases and postemplo benefits. We will continue to provide technical publications and assistance on emer issues. Member Firm of Kl Peat Marwick Goerdeler I A XWPeat Marwick Mr. Dan Faust Ma 2, 1991 Pa Two EXHIBIT 'A PAGE 2 OF 2 Professional Fees Our fees are based on.the time expended b the professionals assi to the en at appropriate hourl rates and dependin on the experience of the individuals involved. In addition, we are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses such as posta and report reproduction. Even thou y our operations continue to increase we will limit our fee increases to the Cit rate of inflation used in its bud process or 5% whichever is less. Our not to exceed fees for the next five y ears, includin expenses are as follows (assumes an avera 4% inflation rate): Period Ended Fees December 31, 1991 $17,300 December 31, 1992 17,900 December 31, 1993 18.9700 December 31, 1994 191,500 December 31, 1995 20,300 The fee for a sin audit report, if needed, will be $1,000. Professional fees for an additional work or special projects re b y ou would be discussed with y ou prior to perform- W the service. We are lookin forward to continuin to serve the Cit of Maplewood as independent certified public accountants. Please call me if y ou have an q uestions re this information. Ver trul y ours, KPMG Peat Marwick �i 1.01 Steven W. Laible, Partner SWL/emh 1!1■1�l� Peat Marwick Certified Public Accountants 4200 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone 612 341 2222 EXHIBIT B PAGE 1 OF 2 Telecopier 612 341 0202 May 6, 1991 Mr. Daniel F. Faust Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Faust: This letter summarizes our fee estimate for the audit of the financial statements of the following Independent Fire Departments for the year ending December 31, 1991. • East County Line • Parkside • Gladstone We will conduct our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards with the objective of expressing an opinion on your financial statements as of and for the year ending June 30, 1991. It should be understood that these financial statements are the responsibility of management. In conducting our audit, we will perform tests of the accounting records and such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion on the financial statements. We will examine, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. We will also assess the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the. overall financial statement presentation. We understand that all records, documentation, and information we request in connection with our audit will be made available to us. An audit is designed to provide reasonable assurance of detecting errors and irregularities that are material to your financial statements. Your internal accounting control structure should provide reasonable assurance, although not absolute assurance, against the possibility of such errors and irregularities. We will furnish to you recommendations about your internal control structure we note during our audit. We will also furnish our recommendations about other aspects of your operations in which we observe opportunities for improvement. Our fees, which will be billed as the work progresses, are based on our standard hourly rates plus reimbursement of our expenses. We estimate that our total fee will be $10,500 including out -of- pocket expenses as follows: Entity 0 East County Line • Parkside • Gladstone Not -to- Exceed Fees $ 3,500 3,500 3,500 1 Member Firm of Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler EXHIBIT B OpPea PAGE 2 OF 2 Marwick Mr. Daniel F. Faust May 6, 1991 Page Two Approximately $1,000 will be billed in calendar 1991. Our fee estimate is based upon the following: • The accounting personnel from each department will prepare required account analyses and pertinent audit schedules in accordance with our prescribed formats and locate documents by agreed upon dates. We will provide you in advance with a detailed listing of the information we will need. All schedules, computer listings, etc. will "tie- out ", be accurately footed, etc. • Significant transactions which the departments have entered into in 1991 will be analyzed for appropriate accounting considerations under generally accepted accounting principles prior to our final fieldwork. Detailed workpapers to support these transactions will be prepared by an agreed upon date. • No other significant changes in the department's operations will occur or unusual accounting problems will arise that would impact the 1991 financial statements. • The departments will have available those individuals necessary to answer questions, prepare analyses, etc., that will arise during the course of both interim and final work. Our proposal contemplates that no additional work will be required to satisf ourselves on significant accounting problems that may unexpectedly arise during the course of our audit. Should such a situation arise, we would discuss it with you before undertaking any additional work. We appreciate this opportunity to serve you and will be happy to review this letter with you at your convenience. Please indicate your acceptance and understanding of the contents of this letter b y signing and returning the enclosed copy. Very truly yours, KPMG Peat Marwick �X IZ641� % Steven W. Laible, Partner SWL /emh Enclosure cc: Ms. Kelli Bourhis AGENDA ITEM cT— AGENDA REPORT action by Council: E ndorsed........,,.,,.,,, TO: City Manager Modisie,&_,.�,.�„ Re3ecte��. FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce -Irish Date SUBJECT: Duluth /English Storm Sewer and Street Improvements, City Project 90 -13 Schedule Public Hearing DATE: August 5, 1991 Introduction The feasibility report for the subject project is transmitted. This agenda report provides an overview and proposes financing. A resolution is attached to order a public hearing at a special council meeting to be schedule in early September 1991. Background This is one of the two similar proposed projects to be presented for public hearing. The Duluth /English and Harvester projects involve existing developed neighborhoods which essentially lack storm sewer except for the most rudimentary culverts and a few inlets. The neighborhoods lack improved urban streets consisting of aggregate base, curb and gutter, and bituminous roadway. For the most part, the streets have minimal aggregate base with an oiled or thin bituminous initial surface with subsequent patches and overlays There are no pressing health and safety concerns that are presented to justify the proposed improvements. There are no lawsuits for flooding that propel these projects. Rather, the question is whether the city should make capital investments at this time to systematically upgrade the streets, storm sewers, and utilities of developed neighborhoods throughout the city. The benefits of such projects are to control future street and utility maintenance costs and to improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood. In many cases, there is positive benefit of an investment in upgrading neighborhood streets on private investment and increased property values within the neighborhood. If the city does intend to .systematically upgrade neighborhood streets at this time, then the appropriate question.should be at what annual level of expenditure or how fast should the process god The feasibility report for Duluth /English gives information on several levels of expenditure to allow flexibility in this decision making process. The study area is broken into two areas being east or west of English Street. Two alternatives are presented. The storm sewer and associated assessments are the some for either alternative. Project 90 -13 2 August 5,. 1991 The recommendation within the report to excavate storage volume within Flicek Park is based.on a limited conservative analysis appropriate. for a feasibility report. Past experience with the storm water ponds on the soccer fields south of Frost Avenue indicates that the need for additional ponding - may be over conservative. If the project is ordered, it is intended to carefully .evaluate the analysis. If it is not certain that additional volume should be provided, then it will be left out to be determined by future experience.. The costs of the pond excavation have been left in the estimate as additional contingency. The alternatives vary as to the street restoration'.-or reconstruction to be undertaken. Alternative One is the use of the Walter Street or 90 -07 street section on all streets affected by storm sewer construction. This involves replacement of clay the sanitary sewer services in the right- of -wdy, repairs to sanitary sewer main, grading of street to enhance drainage and improve traffic safety, placement of six or e ight inches of crushed gravel aggregate base, and 2 1/2 inches of bituminous surfacing with integral paver shoe mountable bituminous curb. This section is designed. to be compatible with future concrete curb and gutter. A 1 1/2 inch wear course should be placed on this section within about seven years to prevent pavement degradation. It would be optimum to place this finishing wear course in conjunction with the concrete curb and gutter. Alternate Two is for the use of finished street section with concrete curb and gutter as would be the case for a new subdivision. This alternative would apply to all streets in the project area. It is thought that the use of Alternate'Two is most applicable to Area One, that is the Hills and Dales neighborhood west of English Street. This is because the neighborhood is .completely developed with definite boundaries. The use of the Alternate One (Walter Street or 90 -07 section) is thought most appropriate - in the .area . east of English as this lacks the qualities cited for the area west of English. Although data is available for other options, this agenda. report presents financing for the complete storm sewer system, together with reconstruction with finished streets for all streets west of English and use of .Walter Street restoration for all affected streets east of English. Budget Impact ' The cost of the project as recommended is $1,892,,000.00. A preliminary assessment roll has been prepared. A storm sewer unit assessment of $525.00 for each built or buildable residential property is used in accord. with policy. Nonresidential properties are proposed to be assessed at 10.5 cents per square foot. The storm sewer assessment recovers $151,120.41. To this is added a street assessment for those properties. west of English Street in the amount of $2,000.00 per built or buildable lot. This makes the total assessment recovery $459,000.00. ..Project 90 -13 3 -- August 5, 1991 The use of $2,000.00 unit assessment is proposed on the following basis.. It is a subsidy of about 50 percent of the actual cost of street reconstruction and replacement with finished section. The policy for assessing residentia I properties on MSA streets is to use a unit rate of $1,185.00. The increased, assessment reflects lack of MSA funding togefher with the enhancement to property value of -being located on a local traffic street versus a collector street. The .proposed street assessment policy is dependent on street use .(local or MSA collector), property use (residential or commercial - institutional), and whether the project is reconstruction or new construction. The proposed rates are in increasing . order of cost: MSA collector /residential /reconstruction: $1,185.00 /unit ($1.5.80 per front foot for nominal 75 FF) Local /residential /reconstruction: $2,000.00 /unit ($2b.67 per front foot for nominal 75 FF) ., MSA collector /nonresidential /reconstruction: $36.50 /FF MSA collector /residential /new: $38.50/FF Local /residential /new: $55.00 /FF The balance of the project costs are proposed to be paid by general obligation funding. The proposed financing is: Special assessments: $ 459,000.00 General obligation: 1,433 000.00 Total financing $1,8912 Recommendation It is recommended that a special date be set for a public hearing in conjunction with the hearing for Project 90 -12. ` BAI i Attachments WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare areport -with reference to the improvement of Duluth /English Area, City Project 40 =13, by construction of storm sewer and street reconstruction, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, .THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows.: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Duluth /English Street Area, City Project 90 -13, by construction of storO sewer and street reconstruction is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will. consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B of a time to be determined. by the council to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. o b � Q �• SEXTANT �I QQ '` 00 AN i 112 � GERVALS Ay } d � J PKWY cc RAI4t7�/1��Y AV m VIK)NO DR I HE R R - k • � COPE C7 COPE AY KnucA l/Er LG*6 � � LARK AV w LAM. \\� CO o R 0 A U R z l IE � a S 1 25 cc LELANO RD � o SANG- HURST a M al /o ° (i) c�taNeeRS sr � �� R � [AV � cc � o . ELDRIDO AV GO SX �-'� AN ~ A � N N w PRS� � 5►�- AV a �ILl.Mav av — c av " Q rR,4 IL 28 Flkvk l� SA N FROST p- a 27- " � W FE TON AV WE R QV a SUM y � a FR158IE AV Q 62 Q � w a RIPtrY Vl' Al LIU car: GENERAL HEARING AREA �+ PROJECT 90 -13 DULUTH /ENGLISH STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT e r-� II N N/A PAGE 1 OF 1 D/P N0. 6 143 08 -01--1 9 91 PROJECT N0. BO -13 DULUTH /ENGLISH ALT B PROJECT SUMMARY SEC 15- T-- 29- R-- 22- -QQ --23 30 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM __,�_r!__�w_!_�.___ QUANTITY r- �_��__N__r! PER w�_� RATE _�_�.N -w_�► ASSESSMENT _rl.��.r lam.- �.,..,. . STORM SWR RES * * * * *'* ** *8. UNIT AT **$525,000 EA. = * * *$4, 2001-00 STORM SWR NON -RES ***6 SF. AT ****$.0, EA. _ . **$36 STREETS RES * * *** * * * *0. 000 UNIT AT $2, 000-000 EA. = *** * * * *$0. 00 SEC- 15-- T- 29 - - 00--24 21 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT I STORM SWR RES ********18"000 UNIT AT **$525. EA. - * * *$9 450. 00 STORM SWR NON --RES * * * *71 10::.000 , SF AT' * - ** '0�, �0. 1 k .. - E�. -- * 5 *�7, 46�,. 71 � STREET. c RES * ** - a� - *0. 000 UNIT AT $2,000,000 EA. SEC. 16-- Tw- 29—R- -22 —QQ -11 110 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SWR RES * * * * ** *103. 000 UNIT AT * *$525. 000 EA. =- **$54 075. 00 STOR01 SWR NON.-RES . *********0.000 SF AT - * - ►�. 105 EA. _ *******$0. 00 STREETS RES. * * * * * * ** 93. Ooo UNIT AT $2 EA. 00 SEC- I6-- T- 29- R- -22 -QQ -14 72 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT S. "rORM SWR RES * * * * * ** *711000 UNIT AT * *$525.000 EA. _ 1 �- *$37 275.00 STORM SWR NON —R.ES ****16 SF AT * * * *$0. 105 EA. _ * **$ 1, 701.+00 STREETS RE5 UNIT AT :, 0�' 0. 000 EA. _ *$ 122, 000. 00 GRAND TOTALS 233 PARCELS ASSESSED - ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SWR RES * * ** ** *200.000 UNIT AT * *$525.000 EA. _ ----------- w *$105 STORM SWR NON -RES ***439 SF AT ****$0.105 EA. _ *x $46, 120.41 STREETS RES * * * **** 154.000 UNIT AT $2, 000.000 EA. _ *$308 00 TOTAL. AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = ** PROJECT NO, B0-713 DULUTH /ENGLISH ALT B GAGE 1 OF S 0 8--0 1 --1991 D /P NO. 6143 Wm.G PUBLIC HEARING QUANT CHECK LIST COL. 1) = S TORM SWR RES - UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SWR NON ---RES -- SF COL. 3 ) = STREETS RES -- UNIT PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 1 5 - 29 - 2 2- 2 3- 0002 o w o . 149 1 r 00 0. 00 15-29 _ 1 5---29- ��..2 --23 * 0006 1100 0.00 0.0Q • ' 1 'r K. � �� 0. L7i �C , ' 5C. t w 15-- 2 9- 22" 23 --0015 1. 00 0 . 00 1 1 s 0 K.' �L� • 'L. �� 0 r 0 0 15-29-22-23.0017 1 r 00 0.00 0, vio 1 `�' . 0 0 2 8 7 5 , 00 O« 15- -2922-23-01;-119 -- - o • o�c"� 2815. 00 0. 00 - 15-29-22-23-0020 o• off` 8 t �` . 0r_ 1.5-29-22-23-0021 oloo 15-2` 0. 0 7..' 2G 0 . 1 5 - 2 9•--•22 2 3 - 0024 0 0 L 7 1 3 14 OL� 15--29-22-23-0025 0.00 15-29-22-23-0026 0.00 360.00 1 o. 00 5 'i� �. �� 0 . 14 1 0 15 � o w o o 5 � G i[�1 CIO c ► « CIO 15 -29-22-23-0029 o. oo 5360.00 0. Izi 0 1 5 - 29 - 22 - 23-00.30 - 0.00 5360. 0Q 4'i. 00 1 5 - 29 -- 22 - 2 3 - 00 31 0 • 00 4 i1i ., ! ji ill 15 0.00 4400 .00 K.'. 00 15-29-22-23-0036 o l oo 35 789'l. 00 0. 00 15 -29-- .22 --23- - 0037 0, 0IZi 87120. 00 0. 00 1 5 •-- * 2 -' 9' r ' - 1.�..2 - 00w�!C7 0. 00 %..11�1....%34. 00 0. (Zi0 o. oo 27177. 00 Vii. 00 15- -29•-- 22• --2, •--00 0.00 22560. 00 0. Izio 0 .00 IZI ie- 1 5 29-- 2 -- 0030 1100 0. L O. 0lZi 15--- 29-- 22-E4- -0031 1.00 �� 00- 0 . ''rr 1 5 - 29 - 1 22 - 2 4 - . 003 2 in 00. 0.00 o oo 1.5-29-22-24-0039 9 1. oo 0.00 �� /},� ti L• M 2 9 -- • 1.: 2 ' - '• -� i0,*5 1.00 0. 00 0.00 . 15-- 1 5... 29'-- 1.x:.2 --"24- x-0056 1100 o r oo 0■ 00 15-29- 1 . 0 0 1.5--- 2c:')- �- 22- -•'24 -- -0058 1 r 00 0.00 ..,i 0. 0�c 1 1100 0. 00 0. 0 0 15-29-22-24-0060 1100 0.00 0.00 1 5 -- 29- -•22--24 -•0081 1800 0.00 0.00 15-29-22-24-0062 1100 0.00 15 1 0. 00 0 , CA 15 1.00 15-29-2 1. Oo 0 . 0 0 0.00 1 5 --- 1- ' 22 r 5 1 r ��Y.' 0.00 0. l 0 15- l8 1 r 00 0. 00 0 . C/ l0 15--- 2 _ - 22 -24-0077 o r oo 45302.00 o r 01Zi 15-29-22-24-0079 o. oo 1 5%)00. 0 0 i�1( it-5-29-22-24-0080 0. 00 10800. Off+ 14 � lz 0 16- 2.. 22 1 1 0 01 1.00 0. 0 Oc� P H U J E;_C N 0, LULU`1 H /E.iuUL I S OL T S PP! �E i:' Uf= b D P NO's 6143 Wh G FIUBL I C HEARING 08 QUANTITY CHECR LIST COL. 1 } = 'STORM GWR REG -- UN 11 STORM GWR NON -MBEs -- GE CClL w 3 utp } -- STREETS S RE UIii 17 PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL ..! 1.6 2 - 1. 0 .0.00 0 . 00 16-29-22-1 1000 O . o Q_ 16 2'9-22-11 00104 is 00 0.00 0. Q 16 .11 00 0 1 0 0 0 00 1 - 29- 22-11-0007 1100 0. 00 1 ■ 00 1 1. 00 : 0R 00 1 • 00 16-29-22- 1 - 0 009 . 1 1 00 0. 00 i • Oc� 1 6 - 2 9-22-11 0010 1800 0. 00 1, lzIo 1 6 - 2 9 1. 1 -Oei 1 1 1100 ��O 1 • 00 16-29- 1100 0. A 1 ■ Ol t- 16- 11- 1 0 0 0.00 0 1 1 �1 1.G 1. 0 0 0.00 0. c� I�1 16---2 9 E2 1 1 0 15 11 0. t% I 0 0. 0 16 3. s 0 0. 0 tf1) 1 r ,••. ,• 1- 0017 1 ■ 00 0.00 1 • OCA 16 -- 01 ?-1 18 1. 00 0.0-0 16 1 ■ 00 0.00 11 00 1.6- 1100 00 1• {,1I 1 _2 2-11-0021 1100 C/1. 0 IZI 1 • c� 14! 29-I:.:.1......... 1 1 "- 1• 0 0 0 . 00 1 r 0 0 16-29-22-11 _.- 1100 0.00 1. w � L. 1• 6 0 1 C --« «.. r� -- ►.... L «• "'" 1 1 `"' t11 t� .....� 1.00 0. 0 ICI 1 0 0 16 - 29 -- 22 -11-0027 1 1 00 LA. 00 0.0 1 6-29-22- 11 - -0028 1 ■ ILA0 0. 00 16-29-22--11-0029 1.00 0. 00 0.00 16-- "- 1 1- " 0 03 Iii 1.00 0. 0Icy . 0 r 1,1 16-2 117 1. O Ch 0. 00 0 + -17 16 - 2 9 - 2 2 - 1 1' _0 0 3 2 1400 0 r OO 0. 0 Il, r 16- 1100 0.00 1 r IC 11�1 1t.-- 29 1- -0035 1100 0. 00 ■ 0�i 6 C'9 1100 0.00 16-- 29--2E-11-00w7 � 1.00 0.00 1 • �t�'I 16- 1.00 0.00 1 16 - 29 -2 2 -11-00 3 9 1100 0100 1 . 00 1t':,-2G-2E-"«1 1--0 40 1. 00 0.00 1 w Id_ IL 16- 1 0.00 1.0 6-29 - .1100 0.00 1 • 00 16 1000 0.00 1 16-29-22-11-0044 1100 0.00 16-2 1 -- 1 w 00 0.011 1. 1 0 c 16-29-22-11-0046 1.00 0.00 1. lz10 1 6-29-22-11-0047 1.00 0.00 1.00 16-29--22-11-0048 1. 00 0.0 00 1 w 16-29-22- 1.1- -04149 1100 0. 00 1. 00 16-29-22-11-0050 1.00 0.00 1. 00 16-29-22-11-0051 1.00 0. 00 1. 012 16-29-22-11-0052 1.00 +ZI. k�� 0 1 . Y_ _ 1.6--� 1.- - 0ICI 53 1100 0. 0 0 0 I 1 . `i. 0 PIROJEC`r NO. BO-13 DUL.UI H /ENGL. I S1--I ALT F-i UL OF EJ D,/Pl NO. 6143 WX10 PURL I C HLAIR I NG QUANTITY CHECK LIST `.�0LR J ) ""' S TORM SWR RES UN I T COL w 2 ) STO RM SWR NO-N - RES -- SF COL. �rRcE.�w �- UNIT PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 1 6 .2 9 - 22 - 11 - 0054 1.00 �i. ��1 1 . +710 .J.6-29-22-11-0056 1100 0.00 1 6-29-22-11-0057 1 R 00 0.0 1 , 0 16-29-22-11' 00581 1100 Is IZI ILI itE �29- -22 -1 1- 0059 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1 �� W �r� �� .rw W M. •M h.• .1600 o • o o 1 R o 'Lr' 16-29-22-11-0061 1100 0100' 1 6 - 29 - 2 2-11-006 - 2 1 s 00 o. oo 1. 00 1 0 i. 00 o +211 1 1. 16 - - 1 • 0+Z1 o r oo Is +ci 0 16-29 -0065 1.00 0.00 1: w 00 16-2 3-22- 1 -0066 0. 00 1 0. 0c) 16-29--22-11-.0068 1 1 0 0 0■ 0 0 Is o IZI 1100 0. L71 0 1. 00 1 6 -- 1.. 9 "L"2 - 1 1 - 0 .,'70 1 ■ 00 0« 00 1 ■ 00 16-29- -22 --11 --0 1.00 0. 00 1, 0 16-29-22--1 1100 0. 0 0 7 1 16--29-22' -1 1 -+211 -0073 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 140 r 1 L , 0 1. 16 00 7 5 1. o. o o I s 1 G Z . 1 ►LI 1 1 r 00 0.00 .1. w 00 1 - 0 1 07 ! . 1 • �L�0 � 0�L. 1. �)�) ' 1. C 1 6 - 2 9 - 22 - 11 - 0 +j1 7 9 1. 00 0. 00 1 00 1. L 'L » ' � 1 6 - 29 - 22 - 1 1 - 0 0 8 1 1000 0 . CAL 1. 1.00 0.00 1 ■ L710 1 "" 1`..t r ""' �:.: ►:: '"' 1 1 -0 1 . 1 1 1 11. tc " 10 1 0 1 6 -2 9 -22-1 1-00 8 5 1 . 1Z1 0. 00 1.0 16-29-22-11-0087 1800 0.00 :1 00 1 1.00 0.00 1.00 i6-- 29-- 22-11-0f195 0.00 0. 01:'1 1.00 k tZ1 o 0.00 1 r lZ1 O 16 0.00 o. 1Zo 1w �/y,� ��)• 1 6 - 29 - 22 - 11 - 0098 ��/�� ..... 0099 1 0 00 111. 0tj1 1 . ovi 16-29-22-11-0100 1100 0. 0 0 1 ■ 00 1 6*29-22 11- -0101 or oo 0.00 1.00 1 L. -'- 2 9 -- 1. 2 11-0102 0 R 0 0 0.00 0 1•D 1 ■ +L � 16-29--22-11 - 1 1114 111 oo 0 �, r (tI0 16 11 00 Q). 00 1 16--29-22-11-0106 1100 0. 0 11 1. Izlo 1.6-- 29- -22- 1 1 -010'7 1.00 0.00 ' 0 w (1121 1 r 1? K 16- 1.00 0.00 J. r 00 -01 10 1. 00. 0. 00 1 r 00 1.6--29- 1. 0 1. 1 Z 1 O 1 6 - 29 - 22 - 1 1 `... O 1 1C 1100 0. ob 1. 00 PROJECT NO. IZI- 1; DULUTH/ENGLISH AL.�l' S �:�� -ai:�L 4 U�� g D/ Pl NO G- WMG PUBLIC HEARING Q 718- VI I DUANT x TY CHECK L I S - I" COL. 1) = STORM - SWR RES -- UN I T COL... 2) = STORM SW R NON-- RES SF COL. 3) ST�RLETS RLS UNIT COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 10--29-22-11-0113 1. 0 I. 1 '/},' J. ■ 'f..' .1100 0.00 1. L 71 0 1. b"--2 9-2 2' 11-0115 1100 0. 0 0 1 . L 71 0 16 o• oo 0 1.00 16-29 0 0 1 1100 IZI oo O ■ 0 0 1 22 -14-000 2 1 • o o 0. 0 O. 0 16-29-22-14-0003 1. 00 o. oo 0. oQ 1E-29-22-14 . 1100 o 0 O ICI 16 - 29- �22 -14 0005 1.00 0■ 0lz1 1. 00 16-29--22-14-000 G 1100 ON 014 16 1 . 00 0 I / C ( / 16-2 ` 1 . 00 0w o 1. O4:. 16 1. 00 0.00 1 . ICI 0 16- 1 . 0 0 0 .00 .. 16-L9- - 1000 0.0 1.00 16- 1 iR 1 . 00 o ■ ►co i I1'I 1 r I<. .t. 16-29-22-14-0013 1000 0.00 1, 00 16-29-22-14 1. 0 0 0.00 IN o 1z1 16- IN lZi 0.00 1. 00 16-29 1100 0. 00 1. 12 16-29-22-1.4-00 17 1100 0.00 IN 00 1 22--14 --001 B 1.00 0. lzi141 1 w 00 16-- 29- 2 1100 0. 1 16- . - 29�- - 22x -- 14 :0 1. Ic"1 0. 00 0 1 w 0 K..' - 1 G2.9-22- 9-22-14-0021 1.00 0. 00 1 ■ 00 1100 0.00 1 r 0 0 16 1100 0 ■ IZI 171 1.00 16-- 2 9--- 2 2 -14 --0 1.00 0. 00 1 , Cl 16 .L... �F�- '�Y.IK. +L»J • �L�K.` 0. 0C� 1.0c 1 . 0 0 0.00 1 . IZ i Izl 16-2 11 00 0. L71 16- 1100. 010.0 1.00 1 -29-22-14-0 1100 0. 00 1.00 16 2 9--22-14-- 0x% - .31 1 1100 010.0 1, IZIt11 1 r- :9 `2 14 --0052 1.00 oloo f 1 .0 0 16- 1100 0. 0 0 1 . oo 1 6 - 2 9 - 2 2 - 14 - 00 3 4 1. 00 ON 00 1. IZI 16 - 2 9 - 2 2. - 14 -003 5 1 0. 00 1 w 0 0 16-29-22-14-00136 1100 o. oo 1. CIO 16- 29-- 22--14 --007 1100 IZI■ o 1. 00 16-29-22-14-0 1.00 0. 110-0 16-29-22-14-00 39 1. o11i 0.00 1.00 16- -29--22-14--0040 1100 0.00' 1. CIO 16 -- 2 9 -- 22 -14 -- 1100 0.00 1. 00 16- -- - 2 2 --14 -004 1 ■ 00 1 0. I� 0 INC 10 16-2 1. 00 0. 00 1.00 1 . c k. 1100 0.0 1. Ill'I 16--- - 22 - -14-0046 1100 1.00 16-2:'9-22-14-0047 1. 0 0 X111 0 0 1 . 0 0 PROJECT 1\10. DO-- DULUTH/ENGLISH ALT B PAGE OF 5 03 --Ql1 -1991 D /P' N0 61 WmG PU HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST (;0L. 1) STO RtTl SWR RES -- UN I T COL.. 2) = STORM SW R NON-RES SF C OL N u 3 p -- STREETS RES U N I T PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 16-29-- 22 - 14--0048 11 00 0 . 00 1 100 16-29-22-14-00 1000 0. 00 1. Oel 16-29-22-14-00.50 1100 0.00 1.00 16-29-22-14-0051 A L 0. Oo 1.00 16-89-22-14'0052 11 . 00 1100 14 - 005 1100 .0100 1. 00 16-29-22-14 1054 1100 o l oo 1. 00 16-29-22 -- 14--0055 11 00 o. oo 1.00 16-29.-22-14 1.00 1. 00 16-29-22-14-0057 0057 1. 00 0.00 1100 16 1.0 0 00 1. 00 16 .1100 o oo �. -- 2 9 - ' 2 ' 2 -.14 •-- 0 0 6 ICI 1-.0 0 . 0 0 1 22 14 00 81 1. 00 0.0 � o 16-29- 22- 14-�-0062 1100 0. 00 1. CIO 16- 2 9 - 22 - 14 * 006 3 1.00 0.00 1. CIO 1100 0 .00 1.00 1 6- 2 9-E 2 -.14-0065 - 1. O L 0. [z el 1 w IZI (c� 1 6 - 29 - 22 - 14 -- 0066 1. 00 0 w 00 0 w V-IizI 16 - 29-2 2 1 4 - -0 087 1100 ow oo 0. Cl 3.6- 1.00 0.00 0. 1 16-29- 0.00 15 00. 00 0 , Izi 16--2 - 22 - 14 - 00 1'6 1. 00 0. 0 C/1 C1 16- 1.00 0.00 O 00 GRAND' TOTALS 200.00. 439242, 154. 110 AGENDA NO. T. AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: DATE: City Manager Finance Director PREPAYMENT OF 1983 G. O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS August 5, 1991 Aetion by Counoll dorse UodlfieA 11eJ acted date INTRODUCTION It is proposed that the attached resolution be adopted that will prepay all future scheduled principal payments on the 1983 G. O. Improvement Bonds and save approximately $451,000 of interest expense. BACKGROUND Prepayments on special assessments over the past eight years have produced a cash balance in the debt service fund for the 1983 bonds of $1.6 million. Generally, this is a positive situation because the interest rate on investments usually exceeds the interest rate on bonds. However, the 1983 bonds were sold when interest rates were historically high. Consequently, the coupon rate on the remaining bonds outstanding for this issue range from 8.0% to 9.0% and average 8.74 %. The current rate on investment purchases with a two -year maturity is about 6.8% and these rates will probably not increase significantly in the foreseeable future. Also, it should be noted that the allocation of investment interest to debt service funds is based upon the average rate earned on the city investment portfolio which currently has an average maturity of 240 days. Therefore, the average rate on the portfolio will go below 6.8% if market interest rates do not change. The attached Exhibit A is a financial projection for this bond issue that indicates that if the bonds are not prepaid there will be a cash balance on December 31, 2002 of $1,238,000. The attached Exhibit B is a financial projection for this bond issue that indicates that if the bonds are prepaid in 1991 there will be a cash balance on December 31, 2002 of $1,689,000. Both of these projections assume an average rate on city investments of 6.0 %. The difference between these two projections is the amount of interest expense that will be saved if the 1983 bonds are prepaid. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted that will prepay all future scheduled principal payments on the 1983 G. O. Improvement Bonds and save approximately $451,000 of interest expense. Attachments RESOLUTION CALLING FOR REDEMPTION OF OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1983 SERIES A AND GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1983, SERIES B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, (the "City "), issued on behalf of the City, $2,000,000 General Obligation Improvement bonds of 1983, Series A, dated May 1, 1983 (the "Series A Bonds "), of which Series A Bonds $850,000 still remain outstanding; and B. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City issued on behalf of the City, $3,055,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1983, Series B, dated May 1, 1983 (the "Series B Bonds "), of which Series B Bonds $1,105 still remain outstanding; and C. WHEREAS, all of the said Series A Bonds maturing in the years 1992 to 2002, both inclusive (Series A Bonds numbered 253 to 400, both inclusive), are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City in inverse order of serial numbers, on December 1, 1991 and on any interest Ym a ent date thereafter at p par and accrued interest, all as provided in the resolution of the City Council dated May 18, 1983 authorizing the issuance of said Series A Bonds (the "Series A Resolution "); and D. WHEREAS, all of said Series B Bonds maturing in the . years 1992 to 2002, both inclusive (Series B Bonds numbered 414 to 611 both inclusive), are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City in inverse order of serial numbers, on December 1, 1991 and on any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest, all as provided in the resolution of the City Council dated May 18, 1983 authorizing the issuance of said Series B Bonds (the "Series B Resolution" )• and E. WHEREAS, the City Council deems it desirable and in the best interests of the City to call all of said Series A Bonds maturing in the years 1992 to 2002, both inclusive (Series A Bonds numbered 253 to 400, both inclusive), on December 1, 1991, in accordance with said Series A Resolution; and F. WHEREAS, the City Council deems it desirable and in the best interests of the City to call all of said Series B Bonds maturing int he years 1992 to 2002, both inclusive (Series B Bonds numbered 414 to 611 both, inclusive), on December 1, 1991, in accordance with said Series B Resolution; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Series A Bonds to be Redeemed All of the Series A Bonds maturing in the years 1992 to 2002, both inclusive (Series A Bonds numbered 253 to 400, both inclusive), shall be redeemed and prepaid on December 1, 1991 at par and accrued interest for each such Series A Bond called. 2. Series B Bonds to be Redeemed All of the Series B Bonds maturing in the years 1992 to 2002, both inclusive (Series B Bonds numbered ' 414 to 611, both inclusive), shall be redeemed and re aid on December 1 1 1 at par an p p 99 p d accrued interest for each such Series B Bond called. 3. Publication of Notice of Call; Mailed Notice The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the call to be published in Northwestern Financial Review prior to December 1, 1991, the date for call, and to give mailed notice of call to the bank where said Series A Bonds and Series B Bonds are payable. Said notices shall be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF CALL FOR REDEMPTION GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1983, SERIES A CITY OF MAPLEWOOD RAMSEY COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that by order of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota, there have been called for redemption and prepayment on December 1, 1991 outstanding bonds of the City designated as General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1983, Series A, dated May 1, 1983, bearing serial numbers 253 through 400, having stated maturity dated in the years 1992 through 2002, and totaling $740,000 in principal amount. The bonds are being called at a price of par plus accrued interest to December 1, 1991, on which date all interest on said bonds will cease to accrue. Holders of the bonds hereby called for redemption are requested to present their bonds for payment, with December 1, 1991 and subsequently maturing interest coupons attached, at First Trust National Association (as agent for, The First National Bank of Saint Paul), 180 East Fifth Street, 3rd Floor - Bond Drop Window, or if by mail, to P.O. Box 64111, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0111, on or before December 1, 1991 Dated Y 1991. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL /s/ Mrs. Lucille Aurelius City Clerk Important Notice: Under the Interest and Dividend Compliance Act of 1983, 20% will be withheld if tax identification is not properly certified. Additional information may be obtained from: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 85 East Seventh Place Suite 100 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2143 Telephone No.: (612) 233 -3000 4. Deposit of Sufficient Funds. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to deposit with the bank where said Series A Bonds and Series B Bonds are payable prior to said call date sufficient funds to pay all principal and interest due on said Series A Bonds and Series B Bonds as of the call date. Exii,Gii- 0 FILE NAME: BOND317B FILE LOCATION: ASSTFIN, C:`123R22 \BUDGET, CD 107 DATE: 05- Aug -91 PREPARED BY: BA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA DEBT SERVICE BUDGET FUND 317 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ACCT DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED PROJECTED ------------------------ rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr -rrrr rrrrr---r----------------------------------------------r------- Revenues: Special Assessments: 3110 Current Principal Current Interest 331,042 rrrrrrrrrr rrrrrr 312,299 rrrrr 107,279 88,167 rrr . rrrrrrr 105,854 78 - -rrrrr - rrrrrr 89,075 68,977 -rrr rrrrrrrrrr 89,075 60,960 rrr rrr 89,075 52,943 rrrrrrrrrrrrr 89,075 44,926 - rrrrrr r 89,075 36 89,075 28,893 89,075 20,876 89,075 12,860 40,629 4 13,178 1 Total Projected Delinquent 12% 331,042 0 rrr rrr - - rrrr 312,299 0 -------- rr 95,446 1 23,454) rr - rrrrrr -rr 84,357 1 22,,123) �r � -rrrr rrr 58,052 1 18,966) r r r rrrrr- rrrrrrrrrr 50,035 1 18,004) rr 42,018 1 17,042) - -rrr r rrrrr 34,001 t 16, 1 080) - r err rrrrrr. - - -rr- rrrrr 25,985 1 15,J18) rrrrrrrr - rrrrrrrrr -r.r 17,968 t 14 1 156) rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 09,951 1 13,194) - -rr- 01,935 1 12 1 2,32) rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 5 5,457) -rr t 4, 1 364 1 Net Current Assessments 331,042 312,299 171,992 162,234 139,086 132 124,976 117,921 rrr 110,867 rrrrr r.r rrrrrrr 103,812 r rr rr rrr- 96 rr rr rr - rrrrrrrr 89,703 - rrr rrr 40,015 -r rrr- - rr r 12,640 3130 3140 Delin went DeferNd 6 51,933 .186,104 81781 17,010 0 18,299 0 19,064 0 19,044 0 18,836 0 18,477 17,998 17,422 16,769 16,054 0 15,290 0 13,323 0 3160 3170 Penalties Forfeited tax sale apportionment 2, 7 11 1,035 27;575 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Deferred - County 0 0 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,482 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue: ------------ 3801 --- Interest on ents 167,241 ------------------------- 135,252 126,610 - - - - -- - r - -- 93,881 - ---------------------------------------------------- 90,1.3 2 86,808 83,649 80,758 78,154 75,854 73,880 72,258 71,913 72,657 Total Revenues 560,028 - �rrr�r-r- rrrrrrrrrrr 743,011. 326,093 �-- rrr.rrr. 284,894 rrrr- rrrrrr 258, 842 -rr.r rrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrr 248,363 237,941 rrrrrrr 227,637 - rrrrrrrrrrr- rrr--------------------------------------- 217,498 - rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr- 207,568 -------- 197,886 rrrrrrrrrrr- 188,497 rrrrrrrrrrr ------ 127,218 - - - -- 98,620 rrrrrrrrrr Expenditures: Debt Service: 4810 4820 Principal Interest 415,000 226,250 400,000 196,162 225,000 166- 190,000 148,725 175,000 133 525 175,000 119,175 175,000 104,475 175,000 89 600 175,000 74,550 550 175,000 59,325 175,000 43,925 160,000 28.,350 95,000 13,950 60,000 5 4840 Payying Agent Fees Bo�tds Called 891 0 1;274 1068 1;200 1;200 1;200 1;200 1;200 1;200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 0 0 0 0 0 Other Charges: rrrrr -rrr- r rr 4920 Interest - Interfund Loans 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4930 Investment Management Fee 9 rrrrrrrrrrrrr 8,780 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr- 7 6,102 rrrrrrrrrrrrr 5 - rrrrrrrrrrr 5 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr- 5,437 rrrrrrrrrrrr.�- 5,249 5,080 4,930 4,802 4,697 4,674 4,723 Total Expenditures 651 r 1 362 rrrrrr rrrrrrrrr 606,216 rr rrrrrrrrrr 400,116 r rrr rrrrr- 346,027 rrrrrrrr 315,589 r r r r rr r r rrr 301,018 r 286,112 271,049 rrrrrrrrrrrr 255,830 rrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrr- 240,455 rrrrr 224,927 - rrrrrrrrrr 194,247 rrrrrrrrrrr 114,824 rrrr rr 71,323 Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures (91,334) 136,795 (74,023) (61,133) (56,747) r rr r r r rr (52,654) rr rr rr r r rr r rrr (48,171) wrrrrr r rrrrr (43,413) - rrrrrrrrrrrrr (38,332) rrr r rrr (32,888) r rr rr rrrrrr (27,041) r r rrr r rrrr (5,750) r r rrrrrr r r 12,394 r r rrrrr rrr 27,297 Fund Balance - J anuary 1 ' 1,593 rwrr- rrrr- rrrrrrrrrr.Mrrrr 1,501,907 1 rrrrrrrrr 1 rrrrr�rrwr� 1 .rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr--rrrrr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fund Balance - December 31 $1,501, 907 $1,638 rrrrrrr rrrrrrrrr rrrrrr..rrrrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrrrrrrrr rrr r- rrrrrrrrrrrr rrrr $1,503,546 $1,446,799 $1,394,145 $1,345,973 $1,302,561 $1,264,229 $1,231,341 $1,204,300 $1,198,550 $1,210,944 $1,238,241 - - rr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr -r rrrrrrrr -rr -rrrr +rrr- -- rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr- rrrrrrrr- rrwrrrr-rrr�rrrrrrrr� rrrrrrrrrrrrr -rrrr rr rrrr rr rrrr rrr rrrr r rrrrrrrrrrw�rrrw�r rrrrrwr rrrrrrrrrrr - Aw -- rrrr rrrrr I+ rrrrYrrr rrrw rrrwrrr r r ,rrr - rrr rrrrrr- rrr�lrrrr� rrr rrr -- rrrrrr -rrrrr L�Xit%61v 6 FILE NAME: BOND317A FILE LOCATION: ASSTFIN, C:`123R22\BUDGET, CD 107 415,000 226,250 400,000 196 162 225,000 166,163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DATE: 05- Aug -91 891 1;274. 1;068 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PREPARED BY: BA 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Charges: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 4920 Interest - Interfund Loans. 4930 Investment Management 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 DEBT SERVICE BUDGET 0 0 0 0 0 0 fee 9,221 8 7 0 62 723 1,393 FUND 317 3,461 4 4,886 5 6,144 Total Expenditures ACCT ------------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION r--- - 1989 ACTUAL - --- -r -- - 1990 ACTUAL - - - - -r - w r- r 1991 PROJECTED ---- -- wr -r ---r 1992 PROJECTED -r r- r r r r 1993 PROJECTED -r r- r- r -r -rrr 1994 1995 PROJECTED PROJECTED -- - r r r r -r - -rrrr - r -r - 1996 PROJECTED r w -r r r r r- -- 1997 PROJECTED ---r r r r r r- - 1998 PROJECTED -r r w-- w- r- r 1999 PROJECTED -r - -rrr -mow -r w 2000 PROJECTED r- ---- r r r r 2001 PROJECTED ---r -r r r r r r 2002 PROJECTED r r r r r r r- r r. Revenues: -.� - -- --- --- 181,494 -- -r- - -r - rrrr 183,968 -- -- r r------- 186,521 rrrr -- -r 136,051 - - -- -- r r - r 114,342 Fund Balance - January 1 1 1 1 (165,321) 15,773 ------ 185,287 -r -- 357,237 531,570 708,269 887,348 Special Assessments: 1 1 1 Fund Balance - December 31 $1 $1,638,702 ($165,321) $15,773 -- $185,287 $357,237 r---- - $531,570 - - - - -r $708,269 $887,348 $1,068,842 3110 - - - - -- Current Principal Current Interest ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 331,042 312,299 107,279 88,167 105,854 78,503 89,075 68,977 89,075 60,960 89,075 52,943 89,075 44,926 89,075 36,910 89,075 28,893 89,075 20,876 89,075 12,860 40,629 4 13,178 1,186 Total Projected Delinquent 12% -- 331,042 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 312,299 0 95,446 23,454) 1 84,357 ) 22,123 58,052 18,966) 50,035 1 18. v 004) 42,018 t 17 1 042) 34,001 16,080) 25,985 1 15,J18) 17,968 1 14, F 156) 09,951 13,194) 01,935 1 12,232) - 5,472 t 5 1 457) - - - -- rrrr - 4,364. 1 1,724, Net Current Assessments 331,042 312,299 171,992 162,234 139,086 132,031 124,976 117,921 110,867 103,812 96,757 89,703 - 40,015 - - - -- rrrr -. 12,640 3130 3140 Delinquent Deferred 6 51,933 186,104 81,7.81 17,010 0 18,299 0 19,064 0 19,044 0 18,836 0 18,477 0 .17,998 0 17,422 0 16,769 0 16,054 0 15,290 0 13,323 0 3160 Penalties 2 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3170 Forfeited tax sale apportionment 1,035 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3190 Deferred - County 0 0 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,480 10,482 0 0 Miscellaneous Revenue: 3801 Interest on investments -- - 167,241 - - -- - - - - 135,252 --- --- - r- rrrr 126,610 - -- --- -- -- 0 ------------------------ 946 11,117 21,434 31,894 42,496 53,241 64,131 75,169 86,360 94,523 Total Revenues wrw-. 560,028 . ---- r- 743,011 w w+ ------.-- 326,093 r------ 191,013 r- r -- - - - ---------------------------------------- 169,576 172,672 175,726 ----- 178,773 �-------- 181,841 �- --- --- ----- 184,955 --- ------- - rrrr -- - 188,136 ---- ---- - - - --- - - -- - ------ 191,407 - -- rrrr----- - - -- - - - 141,665 r - - - -- - -- - - - - -• 120,486 - - - -- rrrr - Expenditures: Debt Service: - - -- -.- - -- 481.0 Princi al 4820 Interest 415,000 226,250 400,000 196 162 225,000 166,163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4840 Payy Agent Fees BoAs 891 1;274. 1;068 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cal 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Charges: 4920 Interest - Interfund Loans. 4930 Investment Management 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fee 9,221 8 7 0 62 723 1,393 2 2 3,461 4 4,886 5 6,144 Total Expenditures r--- - L r- -- - 651 ,362 -rrrr -- -- -rrrr - - - - - - - -- 606,216 2 -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -rrr - - -- --------- 9,919 62 723 1,393 2,073 2 3 4 - - -- 4 - - - - 5,613 6,144 Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures (91,334) 136,795 (1 181,094 ------------------- 169,514 171,950 r - r -rrr 174,333 -- - - -- -- -gyp 176 - --- --- --- 179,079 -.� - -- --- --- 181,494 -- -r- - -r - rrrr 183,968 -- -- r r------- 186,521 rrrr -- -r 136,051 - - -- -- r r - r 114,342 Fund Balance - January 1 1 1 1 (165,321) 15,773 ------ 185,287 -r -- 357,237 531,570 708,269 887,348 1 1 1 1 Fund Balance - December 31 $1 $1,638,702 ($165,321) $15,773 -- $185,287 $357,237 r---- - $531,570 - - - - -r $708,269 $887,348 $1,068,842 $1,252,810 $1,439,331 $1,575,383 $1,689,725 - �.- ---- -- -r -- rrrr w -r- rrr -- r rrrr- rr -r -re+ rrr---- -rr�� -- -- -r -- -- Mr -r- - r- - -r -r-- -. 10 ---- . r/M- - -r--. err------ r--- r-------- wr-- r--- rr------------- r---- r- r------ r--- r- r- ---- -r--- r----- r---- r -- - - -r - - -r- rr -r--- - - -- - r - - r- -- rrr --- -r - - -- - - -r- r r -- rrrr --- - r -- -- r -- rrrr -r ----------------- rrr r--------------------- AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT ACtioa by Cotuaoil: TO: City Manager Badofted,,,,,.,.,,,,,,,,, Noditisdt� FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish SUBJECT: Harvester Avenue, Project 90 -12— Schedule Public Hearing DATE: August 6, 1991 Introduction Transmitted herewith is the feasibility report for the subject project (titled _Nature Center fond North Subwatershed). This agenda report summarizes required financing. A resolution is attached to accept the feasibility report and schedule a public hearing. Background The streets in the. neighborhood around Harvester Avenue are generally quite flat. Drainage is provided by swales and a few culverts discharging into the Nature Center pond. The streets were originally constructed with minimal design standards at best. The combination of poor drainage, weak pavement structure on moisture sensitive silts and clays which are often present, and the demanding climate with its extreme temperature range, and .many freeze -thaw cycles result in existing streets ranging from marginal condition to those producing ongoing maintenance cost and liability for the city. The objective of this proposal is not to correct some immediately pressing flooding problem or other h It is to put in place those capital improvements that were skipped when the area was originally developed that control ongoing street and utility maintenance expenses and improve the appearance and function of the public infrastructure of the entire neighborhood. The investment of public money in the improvement of neighborhood streets is often matched by a corresponding enhancement of private investment and effort that improves or sustains property values. It is thought that this public hearing, and the similar proposal for the Duluth /English area, will provide a specific forum in which th "e residents and council may articulate their vision as to whether the city should maintain the status quo or should embark on a program to upgrade neighborhood streets and utilities. One characteristic of the neighborhood to which significant attention was given was the need to maintain water quality in the Nature Center pond. Toward this end, it is proposed to construct a pretreatment basin on the vacant lots at the southeast corner of Sterling and Harvester, which are currently traversed by the ditch that currently provides .basic neighborhood drainage. The runoff from low intensity events would be routed through this August, 6, 1991 pretreatment basin to settle out pollutants prior to entrance into the Nature Center - pond. As noted in the report , there is not enough land_ available to provide recommended design criteria for all storm events.. However, low intensity events comprise the great majority of runoff and, particularly snow melt events, generally carry the majority of the pollutant load to receiving water bodies. Another specific feature of this feasibility study is the potential to designate Harvester Avenue as a municipal state aid street. It meets all applicable criteria. It connects to T.H. 5 and T. H..120 at its termini. It serves as the collector for the. neighborhood. Its extension past the signalized intersection with Century Avenue into Oakdale,. 15th Street, is similarly a collector. It would meet the criteria for an integrated system of roadways that collect neighborhood traffic and convey it to the trunk highway system since it presently serves this function. It is proposed to use a 40 -feet wide street section. This section would have a single 12 -feet wide lane in each direction of travel, together with a striped ten -feet wide , parking lane on one side, and a striped eight -feet wide shoulder on the. other side with no P The use of a striped shoulder for pedestrian use is seen as more generally, accepted by the abutting residents than separate sidewalk. Two alternates are presented for either replacement of affected streets only with the interim street sect ion 'developed through .the Walter Street and 90 -07 projects, or to reconstruct all neighborhood streets with improved permanent streets with concrete curb and gutter. Since the interim street section for street replacement discussed under Alternate One does not meet MSA standards, MSA funding is limited to off system transfers for providing drainage for Stillwater Road, T.H. 5. If Harvester Avenue is designated as a MSA route and constructed as recommended in Alternate Two, then there is a substantial increase im M1SA funds that could be used for the project. In fact., the increased MSA funding and assessment recovery result in a decreased amount of general obligation funds required if Alternate Two is used,. Budget Impact Two preliminary assessment rolls have been developed to correspond to Alternates One and Two. The preliminary assessment roll for Alternate One is just for storm sewer at the standard rates of $525.00 per built or buildable residential property unit and 10.5 .cent per square foot for other property uses. The storm sewer assessment is the same for. both alternates. The preliminary assessment roll for Alternate Two adds assessments for reconstruction of local streets of $2,000.00 per residential unit and $36.50 per abutting front foot for other property uses. Reconstruction of Harvester Avenue as a MSA route is proposed to be assessed at $1,185.00 per residential unit. These rates are in accordance with the general policies outlined in the Duluth /English agenda report. Project 90 -12 3 August 6 1991 The following table summarizes the cost and financing for both alternates: Alternate One Alternate Two (Walter Street section (Replacement of neigh- for streets involved with borhood streets with -storm sewer construction ) finished street .section. Harvester as MSA street) Total project cost $1,304,800.00 $1,908,100.00 MSA funding 219,100.00 618,200.00 Special assessments 125,000.00 404,500.00 General obligation 960,700.00. 885 Total financing $1,304,800.00 $1,908,100.00 Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution which accepts the feasibility report be adopted. It is recommended that a special meeting be scheduled in early September 1991 to consider both Project 90 -12 and 90 -13. BAI Ic Attachments RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has : been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Harvester Avenue Neighborhood, City Project 90 -12, by construction of storm sewer and street and utility_ reconstruction, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on Harvester Avenue Neighborhood, City Project 90 -12, by construction of storm sewer and street and utility reconstruction is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 20 The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,908"100.00.1.. 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East County Road B at a special council meeting to be scheduled by the council to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law.. II WCIVtKNL t1tHFtlNly HKtH II PROJECT 90 -12 HARVESTER AVENUE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT 9NRRE III SEC 25- T--29- R- 22 -00-11 4 PARCELS.ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES UN I.TS' AT * *$525. EA. _ ***$1 STORM NON RES _ ****98 SF AT * * * *$0. 105 EA. = * *$10 291. SEC- 25- T-- 29- R- 22 -00-13 55 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM • ww�gr��w�r�_�r�r QUANTITY _- wr�ww_w��rw� PER - ��. -•r_ RATE ��_+�rw��_ ASSESSMENT r�r_rw�rr.�_rr__ STORM RES **** UNITS AT **$525,.000 EA. _ **$28,875.00 STORM NON - RES * * * * * * ** *0.000 SF AT * ** *$0.105 EA. _ * ** * * * *$0.00 SEC-- 25- T- E9- -R- 22 -QQ -14 54 PARCELS ASSESSED • ITEM Now r.�- r_ r_�r__ QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES UNITS AT * *$525.000 EA. = * *$28, 875.OL STORM NON -RES - - - X0.000 SF AT ****$0.105 EA. _ ** *****$0.00 SEC- 25- -T- 29- -R- 22 -00-24 40 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT ---------- STORM RES. * * * * * * * *409 000 UNITS AT * *$525. .000 EA. _ **$21,000.00 STORM NON SF AT ****$0,105 EA. _ * * * * **. *$0.00 .SEC T 6 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES *********6,000 UNITS AT **$525,000 EA. _ ***$3,150.00 STORM NON-RES SF AT * * * *$0. 1O5 EA. SEC.25 T - 29 - R- 22 -QQ -41 16 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER STORM RES * * * * * ** *16.000 UNITS STORM NON -RES * * * * * * ** *0.00+0 SF RATE AT * *$525.000 EA. AT * ** *$0.105 EA. = ASSESSMENT ------------ ***$8,400.00 * * * ** **$0.00 PAGE 2. OF 2 D/P NO. 6144 07 -31 -1991 PROJECT NO. 90--12 HARVESTER AVE Imps PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- 25— T- -29 —R -22- -COQ --42 27 PARCELS : ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES ********26m000 UNITS AT .* *$525.000 EA. = **$13 STORM NON —RES ****92 SF AT ****$0' 105 EA. 9 GRAND. TOTALS 202 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES * * * ** **200.000 UNITS AT * *$525.000 EA. _ 105 000.00 STORM NON -RES ***190 SF AT * * * *$O. 1.05 EA. _ * *$20 033.27 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = **$125,033o27 PROJECT NO, 90-12 HARVESTER AVE IMP = PAGE 1 OF 4 07--31 -1991 D / P NO. 6144 WMG PUBLIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM RES - UNITS COL. 2) = STORM NON -RES SF PIN NOW COL 1 COL 2 25-29-22-11-0048 0 r o0 4792.00 25« 29 722- 11--0049 0 0, 00 25 -29"- 2 1.::. ` 1 1--0050 . .1100 . .0 25-29-82-11-0051 . .1100 0 0. 00 1 1400 0. 00 25 - 29 - 22 -13-0007 2 --13 -0007 1 1.00 0 0. 00 25-29-22-13-0008 1. 00 0000 2 25 -29 - 22 - 13 - 0009 1 1. 00 0 0. 00 2 5 - 2 9 - 2 2 - 13 - 0010 1000 o 00 25 -29-22-13-0011 1 11 00 0.00 2 25 - 2 9-28-13-001 3 1.00 0 0 r . 0 0 1 3-0 0 LL 1 1.00 . 0.00 25- 13 - ' 0017 1 1.. 00 _ . 0 25 - 2 9-22 - 13- 0 018 1 1 0. 00 25-29-22-13-0019 1 1100 o oloo 2 29 2 2'--13 --00 1 11 0 0 r 00 25-29-22-1 1 1 r t7� t7� 0 0.00 25-29-22-13 k r 00 1.... _ k 1100 0 0. 00 25-29-22-1 0024 1 1100 0. 00 25-29-22-13 0025 1 11 0 0 25- - 29- 22 1 1.00 0 0.00 2 1 171 Cho 1 o { / 2 5 - 2'9 - . 22 - 13 - 0029 _ 171 171171 25 29-22-13-0030 1. oo 0.00 25 -29-22 13 -0031 1000 0. lzi0 2»''w-29- -22--1 `0032 1 1 00 25-29-22-13-0033 1100 010 00 ...� ... � 1100 i4� r l::ti..�""L�. -• 1.�,- -00..:, 1100 0,00 - -22- 13--00 7 1100 0. 00 25 -29-2 2 -13- ' 0 03 8 1.00 0 r 00 . 2 5 - 2 9- 2 2 - 13 , 1.00 0.00 25-29--22-13-0040 1.00 o. 00 2 5-29-22-13-0041 1100 2 --0042 1600 0.00 25-29-22-13-0043 1800 0, 00 25--29-22-13-0044 1000 0. oo 25 -29 -2 :-�13-w0045 1000 0.00 25 - 2.9--2-2-13-0046 1100 0. 00 1. 0 0 25-29-2 0. 00 25-29-22.-13-0048 1.00 0.00 25-29-22-13-0049 11000 or 00 25- w29-22-13 --0050 1.00 0 25-29-22-13-0051 1100 0.00 1100 0.00 00 25 5 -, 1. 0 0 -- �9-��" 1,�-��1� 0.00 C- %.j -- "9 - �'i� 2 3 _ 1. ��0 25-- 2 9- 22- -13- -0055 1100 0.00 25 - 129-22-13-0056 1.00 0 PROJECT MCI « 90--12 HARVESTER AVE I MP, � .-., PAGE C., OF 4 07- 31- -1991 D / P NO 6144 WMG PUBLIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL o 1) STORM REG -- UNITS COL. 2) STORM. NON-RES -- SF P1 N NO, COL i cap ;=' 25 - 2 9 - 2 2 -13 - 0057 1100 0 . 0 0 2 5 - 2 9 - 2 2 - 1 3 - 0 0 58 1 100 ow oo 25 29-- 22-- -13- -0059 1100 o ■ oo 25-29-22-13-0060 1 o ■ oo 1900 01000 25-29 22-13 0062 1.00 0.00 25 -- 29 - - 14 1100 0.00 "5-29-22-14- 1. 00 .0100 25 1 . 00 o ■ oo 25 - 29-22--14 --000 11-0.0 o« oo 25 in 00 . 2%5-29-22- 1 « o 0r 00 2 14-000 8 1 0. 00 25-29-22- 1 4-0012A 9 1 on OL 2% j C.9-22-14-0012 1100 w 0 25-29-22-14-0013 oloo t....,.. - 29 - - 22 14 -0014 1 0 w 2 1100 ■ 25 1100 A �A 25-29- 1 ■ 00 0 ■ 00 2 5-29-2i.. .f _` 14-00 19 1.. 0 0 0.00 25-29 1.00 o r oo 25-29-22-14-0021 1100 o. oo 25 1.00 _ L5-29-22-14-0023 22-1.4 --0023 1 « 00 . 00 25-29-22-14-10024 1100 25-22 1 K.'. 25-29 1' . 0 Y. 0. 00 25-29-22-14-0029 1.00 0.00 25-29-,22-14-0030 1100 21 -29- 22-w14- 0031 .1 . 0i 2 5 - - 0032 '1800 o r oo 25 14 -0033 1 a 00 0000 25-29-22-14-0034 { 1100 0.00 25-29-22714-003:55 1100 25-29-22-14-0037 1100 .0100 25 1.00 0. 25 1..00 . 0 1 00 25 1100 0.00 25-29 22--14--0041 1900 0.00 2'5 14-0043 1.00 0.00 25- 29-22-14-0044 1100 0.00 25-29--22-14-0045 .1100 0.00 --29- 22--14 --0046 1000 0 00 25- -29-- 22 --14- -01048 1100 0 ■ L7i0 2 5-29-22-14-0 '050 1000 0. 0lZI �: 5 29 '22 -14 --0051 1100 0w 00 E� -29- 22-14- -0052 .1100 0.00 25 1100 0.00 25 1000 o. 00 2�- -E9 C"--' : 14 -005G 1.00 0.00 PROJECT NO, ��--1 �' HARVESTER AVE I �1F�. PAGE 3 OF 4 07-- ;1-1591 D /P NO, 6 144 WMG PUBLIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) STORM RES UNITS COL. `) = STORM NON--•RES SR' `r } COL 1 COL 2 2 r9 - -2 14- -O 57 0 00 25-29-22-14-0058 1100 .0-00 �.:. 5 •••-'`S-- 22-- 14- -•005 e 1100 o ■ oo N 25- 1100: 0.00 s' 25- ~•29•- X22•-••14-•-0061 .1100 25-29-22-14-0062 0062 tl 1. 00 o. oo 25-29-22-14-0025 2. 00 0.00 z{ 25-29-22-24-0001 1000 0■ 00 I " 100 - '{ 2 ••29 22-2 0003 1100 �+ ��► '25-- 29- -22-��..:'4- 0004 1 r �� - t� O r 0 � 25-29-22-24-0005 1100 0.0 i 25 -29 - 2 2 - 2 4 - 00 06 ' 1.00 0. 0 0 t 2 5 - 29 -28 - 2 4 0007 1100 O■ 00 25-29-22-2 100 25-29- 22 - 24 - 0009 1 . Ow 00 1000 oloo 1800 oloo 25-29 22-- 24�.001�' 1100 o. oo s 25- 1 25-29-22-24-0014 1100 0 00 25--� 9---`2 24�- -001 1. 0� 0 . 00 25-29-22-24-0016 1100 0.00 {;I 25 29-22-24-0017 1.00 `4-0018 1000 oloo -� 2 2 9 --- 2 2 -- 24 0019 1 ■ 1 25-29-22-24-0021D 1100 0. 00 E 25-29-22-24-0021 1.00 0.00 E5--i 9.- - 24-0022 1100 oloo 25-29-22.24-0025 1100 0.00 25-29--22-2'-00k26 1.00 oloo 25-29-22-24-0027 1 1. 00 0 ■ 00 1 25-29-2 1100 ,']� o■ �.t '5-29-22 --•24-0029 1800 O r Oo 25-29.-22-24-0030 1100 o ■ OO 25-29-22-24-0031 19, 00 o■ oo � "5- -'22-- '`4 032 1100 0.00 _ 2J --29-- 22-•-'x:4- -0033 1900 o■ oo 25---29---22- 24 --0043 1100 0.00 `! 25 - 29 - 22 - 24 - 0044 1000 Ow 00 25 - 89 -22-24-0045 1100 0 w OO 25 -22 -24 --0045 r 1000 0r 00 25-- 29--22 --24- -0047 1100 0.00 C 25- -29- 22--24 --0045 0.00 25-29-22-24-0049 1.00 0000 25-29--"L- 24 0050 1 ■ 00 0. 25-29-22-24-00'5 1 E, 1100 0. 00 �..,- •-29-- 22- --31- --0001 1 0 ' 25-29- 1.00 o w oo j 2 1. 0 25- •29-- 22-31-0004 1.00 0.00 25--.. 9--- 22- -31. --0005 1.00 ' 25-29-22-31-0006 1.00 0 ■ 00 P'RCJECT NO. 90-1 HARVESTER AVE Ihr1� P'AGE 4 OF 4 07-31-1991 D /P NO, 6 144 WMG PURL I C HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL.. 1) = STORM RES UNITS COL. :) STORM NON-- RES - SF PIN NOW COL 1 - COL 1.00 o. o 25-- 29 ""'4:2- 41- -0002 1 0. 00 25-29-22-41-0005 2 -41- -000 1100 .0100 25--29---22--.41-0006 1000 0400 25-2 -'41.--0007 1000 0■ 00 25-29-22-41- 0008 1000 0.00 25-- 29-22- -41--0009 .1100 o. oo 25- -22 -41 --0010 1000 o. oo 25-29-22-41-0011 1100 o. oo 25 -0012 1800 o. oo 1100 0. 00 25- 29- -22- X41 -001 1100 0.00 25-- 29-- 22 --41 --0056 .1.00 0.00 25- 29- -22--41- -0057 isoo 0.00 25 41 --0060 1100 0. 00 � 2 5--29-- 22- -41- -0061 1000 o. oo 25--- 29--22 - 42 --0001 0 loo 92783. OO 25 - 29 - .. r 1100 0.00 25-29-22-42-0003 22- -4'2---000 110.0 o. off+ 25-29-22-.42-0004 1100 0.00 25-29-22-42-0005 1. 00 0.00 25- -29 -22 -42 -0006 110 o ■ oo 25- 1. 00 01.00 2 -0008 1100 01-00 .25-29-22 42 -0009 1000 o. oo 25- 29-'22--42- 0010. 1100 o. oo - - 2 9-- �28r- .42•--001 1 1100 0.00 .25-29-22-42-0012 0.00 L. 5 2 ' 4_ ' 2 - 42 - 001 3 1 . 25- 29-M1. 2--42 -0014 1100 0.00 .25-29-22-42-0015 1100 0.00 . 2 5- 29 . 2 2 4 1000 o. oo 25--29--�22 1'. 0.00 25 - 29 - 22, 42-0018* 1800 0. 00 25-29-22-42-.0019 1100 o. oo 25 -- 29- -2 1100 � ■ �� 85•- 29--22- -42- -0021 � 1800 0. 00 25- -29- 2.2--42- --002 1100 o. oo : -0023 1.00 2 5-29-22-42-0024 1100 o. oo 25-- 29- 2 --002 11 00 0.00 25- 29-- 22--42 --0026 1000 0800 25- 1100 0.00 GRAND D TOTALS 200.00 . 19079:.00 PAGE 1 OF 2 D/P ISO. 6144 07 -31 -1991 PROJECT NO. 80 -12 ALT 8 HARVESTER IMP. PROJECT SUMMARY...: LL.,. SEC.25— T- 29— R- 22 —QQ -11 4 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES * * * ** * ** *2.000 UNITS AT * *$525.000 EA. _ ***$1 STORM . NON7RES ****98 SF AT ****$0,105 EA. _ **$10 STREET MSA UNIT AT. $1 EA. _ *.* * * * * *$0. 00 STREET LOCAL - X0.000 UNIT AT 2 00 . 000 EA. = **** ** *$0.00 STREET NON - RES * * * ** *0.000 FF AT. ***$36m500 EA. _ * * * * * * *$O. 00 SEC- 25— T- 29— R- 22 -00-13 56 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES ** *55.000 UNITS AT **$525m000 EA. _ * *$28 875. 00 STORM NON --RES SF AT ****$0,105 EA. _ * * * * * * *$OR 00 STREET MSA UNIT AT $1 EA. = **$14 00 STREET LOCAL * * * * * * * *2 5.000 UNIT AT $2 EA. - * *$50 000.00 STREET NON —RES * * * * ** *544.060 FF. AT ** *$36.500 EA. _ **$19 19 SEC- 25- -T -29-' R-- 22-QQ -14 54 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES * * * * * * ** 55.000 UNITS AT **$5250000 EA. _ * *$28, 875. 00 STORM NON.RES * * * * * * ** *0.000 SF AT * ** *$0.105 EA. = * * * * ** *$0.00 STREET MSA * * * * * * * * *9. 000 UNIT AT. $1 9 185i.000 EA. = * *$10 665. 00 STREET LOCAL * * * * * ** *26.000 UNIT AT $2 EA. _ * *$5J2 000. Q)o STREET NON- -RES * * * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. _ * * **** *$0.00 .,SEC-25-T-29-R-22-00-24 40 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES * * * * * * * *40. 000 UNITS AT * *$525.000 EA. = **$21 0000 00 STORM NON --RES * * * * * * * * *0.1 00 SF AT ****$0,105 EA. _ * ** * ** *$0.00 STREET MSA * * * * * * *c. 000 UNIT AT $1,185,000 EA. _ * * *$2 370. 00 STREET LOCAL ** * * ** *24.00 ► UNIT AT $2, 000.. 000 EA. = * *$48 000. 00 STREET NON -RES * * * * ** *0.000 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. _ * * * * ** *$0.00 SEC- 25- T- 29- R- 22 -00-31 6 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT ------------- STORM RES * * * * * * *6. 000 UNITS AT * *$525.000 EA. _ * * *$3 150. 00 STORM NON --RES * * * ** ** *0.000 SF AT * * *. *$0.105 EA. _ * * * * ** *$0.00 STREET MSA * * * * * * * * *6. 000 UNIT AT $1 000 EA. = * * *$7, 110. 00 STREET LOCAL * * * * * * ** *0.000 UNIT AT $2 EA. _ * ** * ** *$0. 00 STREET NON -RES *********0 FF AT ***$36.500 EA. _ * * * * * * *$0, 00 PAGE 2 OF. 2 D/P N0. 6144 PER 07 -31 -1991 PROJECT NO. 80 -12 ALT 8 HARVESTER IMP. *26. OOL UNITS AT PROJECT SUMMARY EA. _ i SEC- 25- T- 29- R- 22-- 00--41 16 PARCELS ASSESSED NON -RES ****92 SF ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ST REET ASSESSMENT STORM RES * * * * * ** *16.000 UNITS AT **$525s000 EA. _ * * *$8, 4.00.00 STORM NON -RES * * * * * * ** *0.000 SF AT * * **$0. 105 EA. 00 STREET, MSA ********14 0 .00 UN IT AT $1,185-000 EA. _ **$16 00 STREET LOCAL 1. 0 UNIT AT $2,000 000 EA'. - ***$2, 000.00 STREET NON—RES *0.000 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. = * * * * ** *$0.00 SEC- 25- T- 29- -R- 22- -00-42 27 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES *26. OOL UNITS AT **$525,000 EA. _ **$13 00 STORM NON -RES ****92 SF AT ****$0,'105 EA. _ * * *$9 742. `t ST REET MSA UNIT AT $1,1859000 EA. = * *7, 1 0.00 STREET LOCAL * * * * * ** *20.000 UNIT AT $2-0009000 EA. _ * *$40, 000.00 STREET NON -RES *******2 FF AT * * *$36. 500 EA. = ***$9,616. 229 GRAND TOTALS 203 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM RES * * * ** *200.000 UNITS AT * *$525.000 EA. _ *$105 00 STORM NON —RES ***190 000 SF AT * * * * $,0. 105 EA. _ * *$20! 033.27 STREET MSA *-* *49.000 UNIT AT $1 185.000 EA. _ **$58 STREET LOCAL * * * * * ** *96.000 UNIT AT $2 000 EA. _ *$ 192 000.00 STREET NON- RES * * * * ** *807.520 FF AT ** *$36.500 EA. = * *$29 474.48 TOTAL AMOUNT, ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = * *$404 572.75 , PROJECT NO. B0� -1E ALT B HARVESTER IMP. PAGE 1 F 0 5 07- 31`1991 D/P NO, 6144 WMG. PUBLIC HEARING ;QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM . RES - UNITS r' COL. 2 a = STORM NON -RES -- SF COL, 3) STREET MSA - UNIT COL. 4 ) = STREET LOCAL -- UNIT COL. 5 a = STREET NON -RES -- FF PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 25- 29- 28-- 11--0048 0000 4792900 0800 0.00 0.00 25 0000 93218 0.00 0.00 0.100 25-29-22-11-0050 1100 0800 0.00 0■ 00 0.0Q. 1800 0■ 00 0. 00 0■ 00 0.00 2 0900 0.00 0.00 of 00 544.0E i. 25- 29--22 -13 -0006 1.00 Id■ oo 0000 of oo 0■ 00 25- 29-- 22--13 -0007 1800 0 ■ 00 0. 00 o l 00 0.00 !25-29-22-13-0008 1.00 0.00 0■ 0th 0800 0.00 1 25 - 29-22-1 3 -0009 1.0+� i' ■ 00 0.00 0 ■ 0+ 0.00 25 1800 o■ oo o■ oo o oo or oo 25- 29 -22 -13 -0011 1100 0. 00 0. 00 A loo 0.00 2 5-29-22-1 3 -0012 1100 0. 00 0.00 0 800 0 00 25- 29- -22 -13 -0013 1800 0.00 0■ oo 0■ oo 0.00 C5-29-22-13-0016 1000 01000 o■ oo 1100 0. 00 L--13 -0017 1800 o■ oo 0.00 1.00 0.00 ; . 2 5 - 2.9 - 22 -1 3 -0018 1 ■ 00 0■ 00 0■ 00 1 ■ 00 0.00 �,� • -:.� -1.:, -x+019 1.00 0000 0000 1100 0■ 00 -,� - - :'�- 1.� -�►0�0 1000 0. 00 0. 00 1100 0■ 00 =c �9 irt'. 1,3 - 00� 1 2 5 t; 1 ■ 00 ■ ■ 00 1. 00 0 . 00 0800 0. 00 1 ■ 00 0■ 00 2 1000 0. oo 0 ■ 00 1.00 0 a 00 :' 25-29-22-1-3-0024 1000 o. 00 1.0o 0. 0o 0. oo 1800 0.00 1.00 0■ 00 of 00 ' 25- 29 - -1 -0028 1000 0. 00 0■ 00 1100 0■ 00 0.00 0■ 00 1100 0.00 r • , - 19- �`--1,s- t�0L..8 1000 0■ 00 0■ 00 l a 0 + 0. 00 : 25 - C-9-22-1 3 -0029 1800 0■ 00 0a 00 1.00 0.00 ,G "L. " �9 - LL`?` 1 - 0030 !L �.1 1 100 0■ �L��L� oa oo 1 100 �L�. 1 25 - 29 - 22 - 13-0031 1.00 0100 0 ■ 00 1. 00 0.00 : 25 - 29- 22 -1 3 - 003 2 1 ■ 00 0. 00 of 00 1100 0■ 00 25-29-22-13- 1.00 0 ■ 00 .0100 0 ■ 00 0 ■ 00 25- 29- 22 -1.3-0034 1.00 0.00 0■ 00 1.00 0.00 L `9 -2 1 .3 00...x5 1600 0 ■ 00 0. 00 1100 0.00 1800 0■ 00 0■ 00 1100 0. 00 25 1000 0.00 of 00 1100 0 ■ 00 25-29-22 29 -`'` 1 1.00 0 . 1 00 0. 00 1.00 0■ 00 _:25- 29 -22 -13 -0039 1000 0■ 00 0.00 1 1 00 0.00 25 29 -22 -13 -0040 1000 0400 0■ 00 1100 0■ 00 25- 29- .22 --13 -0041 1900 .0100 1000 0.00 0■ oo 1 25 - 29 - 22 - 13 -0042 1100 0. 00 1.00 0■ 04'� 0.00 1000 0■ 00 1100 0■ 00 0.00 25 -2 9- 22--13 -0044 1.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 '' ,c 129 -`2 13 -004 5 1800 0.00 1.00 0.00 4 25 - 29- 22-13-0048 1000 0■ 00 1100 0■ 00 0.00 :: -13 -0047 1100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 -, 29-22-13.-0048 1 0■ 00 1100 0. �►0 0. 00 -'9 LL -13 -0049 1 0.00 1100 0.00 0. 00 • -l • , 9 - 22 -1 -0050 4 L %J V 100`0 0.00 1100 0■ 00 0. 00 c.5 - 29 - Lam.- -1 3 -0051 1800 0 ■ .00 0.00 1100 0.00 1-%j r-9-22-13-0052 1000 of oo 0.00 0■ oo 0. 00 PROJECT NO. DO -12 ALT B HARVESTER IMP, PAGE 2 OF 5 07 -31 --199 1 I D/P NO. 5144 WMG PUBLIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM RES - UNITS COL. 1) =` STORM NON -RES - SF COL. 3) = STREET MSA UNIT COL. 4) = STREET LOCAL -- UNIT COL. 5) = STREET NON -RES - FF 1 1 P IN N0. COL 1 COL 2 COL s COL 4 COL 5 t 0 25- 29_22.13 -0053 1800 00 00 0 , 1 00 0100 0.00 f1. 0 0800 01-00 0. 00 , 5- 29- 22--.13 -0055 G 1800 0.00 0000 0100 0100 -- 29- 22- -13 -005G 10 00 0.00 0. eo 0.0o 00 00 t� C5 - 22--13 -0057 1900 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 2 29- 22 - - 0058 1 0.00 0, 00 0.0o 0.00 � 2 5- 29 -22 -13 --0059 .1800 0100 0.00 0100 0100 1 1 25 29- 22--13 -0050 1800 09 00 0. 00 .0. 00 0. 00 25-29- 1000 0.00 0. e0 . 0.00 0.00 2 5 - 29-22-13-0062 1.00 0.00 0.1100 of 0o 0600 `Y 25- 2 9-28- -14 -0002 1, oo 0.00 0.00 0100 0.00 -,C • 9`r�.�."" 14 -000, 1.00 . 0. 00 0.00 2�-- 29 2 14 - 0 0 04 1800 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 25-29- 22 - 14 - 0005 10 00 0000 .0900 0 0.0e i 25 - 29 - 22 - 14-0006 1400 0100 0100 000.0 0900 :. 5 .S- 22 -14- -0007 1800 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 " 5 - 29- 22- 14 -0�c` 08 LJ L 1.00 0100 0.00 0..00 0.00 X25- 29- '`: -14 -0+09 1800 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 F 25- 29- EE -14- 0012 1900 0100 0. 00 1100 0.00 5 - 29 - 22 --14 - 0013 1800 0100 0. 00 1100 '5 -29- 22--14 -0014 F 1800 0100 0.00 1100 0100 1 25 - 2 9-22-14-0015 1800 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 `5- -L9-- E;� -14 -001 �► 1800 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 L%J-29-22-14-0017 1.00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 2J- 23- �:'` -14 -0018 1000 0. 00 0.00 1100 0.00 X 1600 0.00 0. �c��'► 1100 0.00 25- 29- x`--14 --0020 1100 0.00 0.00 1.00 0. ��0 •_ -.0 29 0021 1.00 0. 00 1.00 25-2-9-22 14 -0022 1100 0.00 0100 1.00 0100 X25 -29 - 2 - 14 - 2 3 1100 0. 00 0.00 1100 0.00 F 1100 0900 0100 1100 .0.00 r�25 - 2 9 - 22 -14 -0025 2 . 00 0800 0. 0th 2100 0.00 X25 -29- 22--14 -0028 1.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0.00 X25- 29 - 22 -14 -027 1100 ` 0. 00 0.00 0.00 25 -29-22-14-0028 1100 0100 0. 00 0,60 0100 25- 29 - 22 - 14 -0029 1 0 . 00 0.00 0.00 0.0 X 29 - 22 -14 -0130 1000 0. 0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 X25 29 - 22 - 14 -0031 t 1.00 �► . 00 0. 00 1100 0. 00 112_'5 1800 0000 0800 1.00 0100 25 29 - 22 -14 - 003.3 1600 0.00 0. 0o . 0. 00 0.00 j25- 29--22- -14 -00 34 1800 0. 0o 0100 0100 0.00 X25 - 29-22 -14 -0035 1800 0.00 0.00 00 00 0.00 25- 29 -22 -14 -0037 1800 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L5 -29- 22--14 -00,38 1.00 0.00 0. 00 o. 0th o. 00 25 -29- 2`--14 -0039 1100 o. 00 0.00 0.00 0.0 • - 29-- 2--14 -0040 1000 0.00 1100 0100 0.00 1125 29 22 -14- -0041 1100 08 00 1.00 0800 0.00 L5- 29- 22- 14 -c�043 1.00 0. 00 1.00 0. 00 0. 00 25- 2-9- -22- -14 --0044 1100 0.00 1.00 0100 0100 5 1800 0.00 1100 0100 0. 00 PROJECT N0, BO -12 ALT B HARVESTER IMP. PAGE � 0 5 07 -31- -1991 D/P N0, 6144 WMG PUBLIC HEARING OUANTITY.CHECK LI COL. 1) _ STORM RES - UNITS COL. 2) = STORM NON -RES - SF COL. 3) = STREET MOA - UNIT COL. 4) STREET - UNIT COL. 5) = STREET NON -RES - EF PIN N0. COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL c 5 25- 29- - 22 -14 -0046 1000 0.00 1000 of 00 o. 09 00 00 00 0. 25-- 29- 22--14 -0050 1100 o. 00 0. 00 1.00.E 25 - 29- 22 - 14-0051 1.00 09 00 0000 1100 of 00 25 - 29-22-14-0052 1800 0. 00 0.00 1100 0.00 25-29 -22 -14 -0053 1.00 of o0 0000 1000 0.'00 25- E9- 22- 14--0055 1 0 00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 25--29 -22 14--0056 1100 01.00 1.00 �. 00 25-29-22-14-00 57 1000 0.00. 0. 00 08 25 - 29 - 22-14-0058 1800 0.00 o. 0o 11 00 . 0. 00 E5- 2.9-- 22 - 14- -0059 1800 0000 o. oo 1100 o. oo 25- 29 -" -14 -0060 1100 1100 o. oc '�5- �;9- `�- 14- -�►�51 1200 0900 1900 0,00 25- 29- 22 -0001 1800 0. off+ 0.00 1100 o. oo 25 - 29- 22 - 24 -0002 1900 0. 00 of 0o 1000 0.00 25 29-- 22--24 -000 3 .1100 0.00 0. oo 1.00 0.00 25 - 29-22-24-0004 1100 0.00 0000 1.00 0.00 .25 5 1100 o. +00 0. 00 1100 0.00 2 5 -29- 22 -24-0006 1100 0100 0 1.00 0.00 00 0.00 0. 0th 1.100 0.00 5 29 -" -24 --0008 10.00 0.00 0. 00 1.00 0.00 25- 29 1 -22 - 24-0009 i. o0 0. oo 0. oo 1100 0.00 25-29- 10 1.00 0.00 0. 00 ..O►* 00 0.00 25- 2*9._,.22- 24_0011 1100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25 29- 22--24 -0012 1.00 o. 00 0.00 0.00 25- 29- 22--24 -0013 1100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00 25 29 - 22 - E4 -0014 1.00 0.00 0. 00 1100 0.00 25 - 29 - 22 - 24 - 0 . 015 1800 00 00 0. 00 1.00 o. 00 c5 2 9 - 2 2 2 4 -0016 1..00 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 25- 2.9- 2E--24 -0017 1800 0900 00.00 1100 0.0o 25--29 -22 - 24 -0018 1900 0600 01.00 1.00 0.00 .25-29-22-24-0019 1800 ` 0.00 0.00 1100 0.00 1000 0900 0.00 1.00 0.00 25- 29- 22--24 -0021 1000 0.00 0100 1400 o. 00 25- 24 0022 1100 0. 00 0.00 1100 0.00 25 29 - 22 -24 - 0025 1000 0.00 0. 00 1.00 0.00 25- E9- 2E' -E4 -0026 .1000 0190 0,00 1100 0.00 E5- 29 -22 -24 -0027 1800 0.00 0.00 1800 0.00 25-- 29 -E2-24 -0028 1200 0,00 0,00 1100 0. 00 E5- 29- 22 -24 -0029 1800 0000 0. 00 1100 0,00 25 - 29 -22-24-00130 1100 0. 00 0. 0th 0. 00 0.00 25-29-22-2 .1100 0.00 0.00 o l 00 0.00 _ ' 5 29- cam: 24 -0�►�` 1.00 0. 00 0. 00 0,00 0.00 25- 29 -22 -24 -0033 1100 0.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 2 1800 0. 00 0. oo 0.00 0.00 25--29 -28-E4 -0044 1000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25- 29 -22 -24 -0045 1100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25- 29 -22 -E4 -0046 1800 0.00 0.00 0. oo 0.00 25 29 -22 -24 -0047 1100 0.00 0. 0o , 0: 00 0. 00 PROJECT N0. BO--12 ALT D HARVESTER IMP, PAGE 4 OF 5 07 -31 -1 99' D /P NO. 6144 WMG RU$LIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1 ) = STORM RES - UNITS COLN, L) STORM NON -RES - SF COL. 3) = STREET LISA - UNIT COL. 4) = STREET. LOCAL - UNIT . COL.. 5 ) = STREET NON -RES - FF PIN N0. .COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 25 29 - 28- 24--0048 1000 0100 1100 0.0 0.00 25 29 22- 24--0049 0100 0000 1. 00 010 25- 29-- 22--24 -005 1. �� Q�. �� 1.00 0100 25- 29- 22--24 -0051 1800 0900 0100 0. 00 0. 00 25-29-22-31 1000 0100 1000 0.00 0.00 25- 29- 22--31 -0002 1900 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 25 1000 0800 1.00 0.00 0.0 25 1.00 0. 00 1100 0.00 01 00 25- 29- 22--31 -0005 1. 00 0. 00 1.00 2 5-29-22-31-0006 is 00 0000 1100 . 080 0 0100 0.00 E5- 29 - -41 -0001 ._.5 11.0 0. 00 0. 00 0. 00 0000 _ __ �.� �. ��.. -29 -2 f -41 -0002 1100 0.00 1.010 0.00 • ' 0.00 25--29 -�. 2-- 41 -00+ 5 1400 0900 11100 �5 - �:'�-�.:'�'- 41 -0�►06 1.00 �. 0� 1000 0400 0100 25- 29- 22--41 -0007 1.00 0.00 1100 0.00 0.00 25-- 29- -22 -41 -0008 i . 00 0100 1.00 0100 0100 25 29 22- 41~-0009 1400 .0400 1000 0.00 0.00 25-29-2&41-0010 1000 0100 1. 00 0.00 0.'00 25 . ,9 -.- `.., -� " 2 -41 -0011 100 . . 000 1.00 � 0. 0+c 0.00 25 11 00 0100 1.00 0.00 0.00 ' 5--29- 2 =' -41 -0014 1100 0.00 1.00 0 0 ■ 0 Q► 0 �0 �. - `9- ` -41 -001 1.00 0. 04'� 1100 . 0100 5 29- 22--41 -0058 180 0.00 1.00 . 0100 0100 0.00 1 25 - 29 - 22-41-0057 1100 0100 09.00 00 25j 1000 0.00 1000 0000 0.00 - '5 `9 -`2 -41 -0061 1000 .0100 1000 0100 0.00 25 29 - 22 - 0900 92786,00 t0. 00 0100 25--29 -22 -42 -0002 1.0+0 0■ 00 1100 0.00 0. 00 25- 29-22-42-0003 . 1000 0100 0800 1.00 0. 00 ' • 5 - L9 -E'` -4 ' -0004 1800 0100 0200 1100 0. 00 25-29- 22 - 42 - 0005 1800 ON 0 10 0. OIZi 1100 0100 - '5- 29 -22 -42 -0008 1000 0800 0100 1000 0.00 25 22- 42-0007 1800 �0. 00 of 00 1.00 0■ 00 �5- 29 -22 -42 -0008 1000 0100 0.00 1.00 0..00 �5- -29- -22 -42 -0009 1000 0100 1100 0.00 0. 00 =' 5 - 29 - -42 1000 0100 1.000 0.00 0. 00 Ei5- 29 - 1600 0400 0. Otd ' 5-29-22- 1800 0100 0.00 1.00 0. �►�'� = 'S `9 ��: - 4�: - 001,; _ 1.0 0.00 0. 00 1.00 0N.00 - '5 - `9 �:2 - 42 - 0014 1000 0100 0. 00 1.00 0.00 5 - 29 - - 42 - 0015 1100 0.00 0100 1.00 0. 0k� 5-29 - 5- 1000 0.00 0. 00 1 w 00 �. 00 29- -E`- -42 -0017 1100 0.00 0. 00 1.00 0.00 5-29- 1.00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 = '5- `9- E'`--4` -0019 1000 0100 1000 0.00 08 0+0 5 1000 0200 0100 1.00 0. 00 - '5- 29 -22 -42 -0021 1000 0. 00 0. 00 1.00 0. 00 �5- `9- �..` 1800 0000 0100 1.00 0.00 25- 29 -22 -42 -0023 1100 0.00 0.0 1.00 0.00 25 22 -42 -00 :4 1. 00 0900 0. Oflr 1. x.. 0 -0 0000 PROJECT NO. D0 -12 ALT ,B HARVESTER IMP, i PAGE 5 OF 5 07-31-1991 D/P NOr 6144 WMG . PUBLIC HEARING QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) STORM RES - UNITS COL. .E') = STORM NON- -RES -- SF COL. ) = STREET MSA - UNIT COL. 4) = STREET LOCAL - UNIT COL. 5) = STREET NON -RES -- FF PIN N0. COL 1 ._COL E COL 3 COL 4 COL 5 00 00 0r 00 1100 0.00 25-29-22-42-0026'. l r 00 0. 00 0000 1 r 00 09 00 25 .1800 o u 00. 1000 0 r 00 .0100 ! f GRAND TOTALS 200. 0O 190793. 00 49s00 96,00 807,52 1 f NEXORANDUX TO FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION Requ, e t Action W. Counc l mod Mod ifted--ffi-f- Rej ....w..- Red eeted.�„ ..�....,_.. Date City Manager Director of Community Development City Land Purchase (2050 - 2146 White Bear Ave.) July 9 1991 City staff is requesting that the Planning Commission consider the City's purchase of five lots, south of County Road B on White Bear Avenue. (Refer to the map on page 8.) St ate l aw requires that the Planning Commission advise the Council whether proposed acquisitions for public use follow the Comprehensive Plan. Proposed uses of,_the properties There are two potential uses of these properties - a City -owned community center or a redevelopment project. Proposed Community Center The first use of the properties is for a community center. In 1989, the City Council adopted a five -year capital improvement plan (1990 - 1994 ) in which the community center project was included. The total estimated cos was $13,000,000 which included land acquisition, construction and equipment. Last month the City Council adopted the 1992 - 1996 Capital Improvement Plan which also contains the community center project. The proposed site for the community center consists of the five properties that are the subject of this report. Last year, a soils study was done on the two southerly properties. According to the study, the City should locate the building as far south as possible, with the parking lot on the north side of the building The City could develop the remainder of the property with trails, open space and picnic areas that emphasize the natural beauty.of the pond. Between the time of the land purchase and the construction of the community center, the City would probably rent the existing commercial buildings to the current tenants. Staff is also studying the Monette and bakery buildings as possible locations for community meeting room space. Redevelopment Project T-7 If the Council does.not approve the community center, the City could start a redevelopment project. The Monette and Fulk properties are blighted. The City could have these buildings removed. Staff is now working on the removal or demolition of the house at. 1800 County Road B. Once the buildings are removed, the City would work with a developer to plan a quality development. Such a development should.emphasize the pond's natural setting, tie into the City Hall grounds and highlight the well- travelled intersection of White Bear Avenue and County Road B. Until that redevelopment occurs,.the current commercial tenants would remain in the buildings. The City would use tax increment financing for.the community center or redevelopment project. BACKGROUND Earlier this year, the City purchased four lots at 1800 - 1810 County Road B (Fulk property). The City plans to use the former machine shop as a maintenance garage for Parks and Recreation. The Planning Commission reviewed this acquisition on January 7, 1991 and recommended the following: 1. The City use of the.Fulk property would comply with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the City should change the land use classification to the same classification as City Hall when the update of the Plan is done. 2. The commercial building cannot be used for the maintenance or repair of motor vehicles. 30 The City may need a conditional use permit to use these lots* On, May 28, 1991 the City Council authorized the City Manager to sign a purchase agreement for the Monette property (2050 White Bear Avenue) . Both parties are reviewing the f inal draft of the purchase agreement. DISCUSSION Cons i ste_y.with the Comprehensive Plan The City's Comprehensive Plan shows the north four properties planned for SC (service commercial use) . The SC classification allows for a wide variety of commercial uses. The City has planned 2050 White Bear Avenue ( Monette Construction) for LSC (limited service commercial use). (See the land use plan map on page 7.) This classification refers to commercial uses on a neighborhood scale. Neither description in the Comprehensive Plan specifically mentions community centers. The City has planned the City Hall property to the east for M (municipal facility) use. If the Council decides to buy these five properties, they should change the land use classification to the same classification as City Hall. They should do this when the update of the Plan is done. 2 Conditional Use Permit The Cit has zoned these five properties. BC. (business commercial and M l (li manufacturin (See the zonin map on pa 8,. Cit Code re a conditional use p rmit for a public use, such as a communit center. RECOMMENDATION The Plannin commission shoul r eport the followin to the Cit Council: 1. The Cit C ouncil should chan the land use classification on these five properties to the same classific as Cit Hall. The should do this when the update of the Plan is done, 20 The Cit will need a condit3.onal use permit for the construction of a communit center. 3 REFERENCE EXISTING LAND USE The five properties the Council is now considering to buy are: 141 2050 White Bear Avenue - 2.52 acres used for Monette Construction.. 20 A 7.42 -acre undeveloped parcel north of 2050 White Bear Avenue, 30 2134 White Bear Avenue A .3 -acre lot with a house on it. 4. A .23 -acre undeveloped parcel north of 2134 White Bear Avenue. 50 2146 White Bear Avenue - A .6 -acre parcel used as a bakery sales outlet. PLANNING The City Is Comprehensive Plan defines the SC (service commercial) classification as follows: This commercial classification is oriented to facilities which are local or community -wide scale. While a full range of commercial uses is permitted in this district, certain types of facilities which may be of a high- intensity nature, such as fast food restaurants, discount sales outlets, gas stations, and light industrial uses, should be permitted subject to specific performance guidelines. The objective of establishing this district is,to provide for a wide variety of commercial uses, compatible with the character and development of the neighborhoods in which they are located (page 18 -31)4p The City's Comprehensive Plan defines the LSC (limited service commercial) classification as follows: The limited service commercial center classification refers to commercial facilities on a neighborhood scale. Heavy industrial uses, department stores, motels, auto accessory stores, etc., would be prohibited. Other land uses of a medium intensity nature, such as gas sales with no vehicle repair or maintenance and with no more than two pumps on a single island to service up to four vehicles at one time, may be permitted subject to meeting certain performance standards as defined in the zoning code (page 18 -31) . 4 go /memo19.mem (section 14) Attachments: 10 Location map 2. Land Use Plan 3. Property Line /Zoning Map 5 F - a w W. A ALMANd W Q Z 4 j YOR AV AV aV V Z LLJ M MAPLE Wa (2) P/C NC - D .......... ........... .... ..-,& .0wo ME - - LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 r J 1 sp 4 %one to w 4 �4 b 0 &M O 0 _ V V N O � 0 0 0 V V � 0 "� 0 O —` Da +o a E E 0. E SC h i :R Man= G RL 1M min r"arterlal t I m m m M L LAND USE PLAN Attachment 2 o a W SC h i :R Man= G RL 1M min r"arterlal t I m m m M L LAND USE PLAN Attachment 2 .. CO. RD. 8 � o 75 - u 03 o -FULK PROPERTY 33' .:ros:;� N N N /. oSa c • 9G �, :- - - -::: 1 ••y V r D C ITY Y HALL LL ' .. .. W a W m� W H 3 PEARSONW: =: : :* :1 I TO CIT OF MAPLEYV000 /2 29--76 ; .. :: .................:::_ {:..................... MONETTE CONSTRUCTION '- . ... . ................ :. y:. . .•:: d Cn si O i 5 • c • , 2' 30 i PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP M1 =LIGHT MANUFACTURING BC= BUSINESS COMMERCIAL >? AREA OF PROPOSED PURCHASE 4 N 8 Attachment 3 Plannin Commission -3- Minutes 7-15-91 Commissioner Fischer moved the Plann0 g Commission recommend lann adoption o the resolution for ;a p t trlic librar at the southeast r corner of Be Avenue and Kennard eet, based on the standards for approval q uired b code. pproval is subject to the followin condi ons: i's All construct ust m 9 n n llow the site plan, date-stamped Ma t 24, 1991, and e cha ty g es re b the Communit Desi mu "e s h t a g e n g a c Review Board, T t council ma approve major chan i after a public hea n and recommendation from the Communit c Desi Review Boa d c . The Director of Communit Development ma approve min h es. 29 The Cit Coun 1 shall view this permit one y ear from the the procedures in the Cit date of appr,2v'al, based y code. Commissioner F ost seconded A --Anitzber Axdahl, Fischer, Fros Gerke, Martin, Rossbach, Si ik, Sinn The moti passed. C, Cit Land Purchase: 2050-2146 White Bear Avenue Secretar Olson presented the staff report. Gretchen Ma Assistant Cit Mana was present. Commissioner Rossbach asked staff for clarification of the process for usin tax increment financin The Commission discussed the economic factors involved with usin tax increment financin and the state fiscal disparities laws. Gretchen Ma g ave a presentation on current plans for the center and explained 'that a stud should be completed in Au which will aid in determinin whether a communit center could support itself. She said that a findin was necessar that land use should conform with the plan in order that the ac can proceed. The Commission discussed whether this proposal should be considered b the HRA before it is reviewed b the Plannin Commission. The Commission discussed whether the tax increment financin if used to purchase the land, would have to be repaid if the communit center is not built. Ms. Ma said that, since the propert is re as bli she felt there would not be an pa re Ms. Ma said when the costs are established and plans for the communit center are available, the advisor committee hopes to receive si input from the public on whether the want the communit center built. Commission Rossbach moved the Plannin Commission recommend to the Cit Council that: Planning Commission Minutes 7 -15 -91 -4- 1. The . Planning Commission in review finds that the existing land use designations are not compatible for a communit center. 2e The City Council should change the land use classification on these five properties to the same classification as cit Hall, if the City Council approves a community center. 3. The City will need a conditional use permit for the construction of a community cent er. Commissioner Martin seconded A es-- Anitzber Y ger, Fischer, Frost, Gerke Martin, Ros sbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays-- Axdahl The motion passed. 59 UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Planned U t Deve lopments Commissione Rossbach presente information on lanned unit nit developments Discussion fol wed. It was the consensus of the Planning Comm ° Ission that the eneral conce t la ' g P should plan is workable and ould be reviewed by the C. mmissioners before being reconsidered at the next Planning Commi sign meeting. Mr. Ro ' g ssbach said he would revise th outline or the general concept plan and submit it for cons -idera ion at he next meet Staff asked the .Commission to re 'ew t time requirements of the process should the p 1d proposed PUD o� t be appealed to the City Council after rejection by the P a ing Commiss 79 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There were no visitor,/prestations . 8. COMMISSION PRESENT IONS a. Representat e for the Ju Fischer / 22, 1991 Council Meeting: Lorraine 90 STAFF PRESENT IONS There were staff presentations. 10. ADJOURNME Meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT AQtian by Counaii: OrSGA TO: City Manager Yod2fied............... Rejected---- FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish date SUBJECT: Highwood /McKnight Storm Sewer Outlet, Project 90 -10- Approve Plans DATE: August 5, 1991 Introduction The subject plans are complete and are presented for approval. The attached resolution authorizes advertisement for bids. Back. rcLound The slopes of the grading of the existing storm water easement north of Highwood Avenue are to be limited to six horizontal to one vertical. It was originally proposed�.to utilize three horizontal to one vertical slopes to maximize the storage volume within the existing easement. The use of 3:1 slopes is understood to be objectionable to the existing adjacent residents. The use of a 3:1 slope requires protective chain -.link fence around pond high water level perimeter under current engineering department design standards. The - installation of fencing around an easement area which is not under fee title ownership by the city would be a problem. The use of a b:l slope is flat enough so that protective chain -link fence is not warranted under current city design standards. The planned excavation to 6:1 slopes will appear less harsh than the grading originally contemplated: Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. BAI i Attachment RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the city council Plains and specifications for Highwood /McKnight Storm Sewer Outlet, Project 90 -10, have been prepared under the direction of the city engineer, who has presented such plans and .specifications to the council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, acopy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the city clerk.. 2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement.shall be P ublished twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, - shall state that bids will_ be publicly opened and considered by the council at 10 a.m., on the 6th day of September, 1991, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered. unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and- the award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of September 9, 1991. i - - lotion by council: endorse AGENDA REPORT Nodif ie -- ReJ eote TO: City Manager Date FROM: Assistant City Manager''''. .3, RE: NOMINATION FOR RAMSEY- WASHINGTON METRO WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD DATE: August 2, 1991 INTRODUCTION The Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District was established to provide and coordinate services to protect, manage, and improve surface and groundwater resources. The District is governed by a board, composed of residents from Ramsey and Washington Counties. Recently, one of the Ramsey County board members resigned. A resident of Maplewood, Mr. G. Paul Beaumaster, has requested that the City Council nominate him as a candidate for the vacant position. BACKGROUND As required by the Watershed District's application procedure, all applicants must be endorsed by the elected body of the municipality in which they live. If the City Council decides to nominate Mr. Beaumaster for the Board position, a letter of endorsement will be submitted to the Ramsey County Board on his behalf. A copy of Mr. Beaumaster's resume is attached. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider Mr. Beaumaster's request for the City Council's nomination for the vacant board position on the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District. If the City Council desires to nominate him, the Mayor should be directed to submit a letter of nomination to the Ramsey County Board on his behalf. G. PAUL BBADMASTBR 1769 Frost Ave Maplewood, MN 55109 (612) 729 -0995 (H) (612) 462 -7999 (W) Admitted to the Minnesota State Bar Since 1988 EDUCATION University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas Degree: Master of Law (LL.M.) Honors: Currently seeking publication of thesis Hamline University School of Law St. Paul, Minnesota Degree: Juris Doctor Honors: Won scholarship in Economic Policy Essay competition. Received American Jurisprudence Award in Administrative Law. Dean's List Cornell College Mt. Vernon, Iowa Degree: Bachelor of Science Majors (3): English, History, Economics /Business Honors: Earned top grades on Senior thesis papers in both English and Economics /Business. Received Loren Martin Scholarship. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE JUDICIAL LAW CLERK The Honorable J. B. Gunderson Duties: Research and write Orders, Finding-of-facts, Conclusion of Law, Order for Judgement, Memorandums of law and other court documents; give legal analysis and opinions on cases under advisement by the court; office and case management; County Law Librarian. RESEARCH ASSISTANT John Copeland Performed research, written and oral analysis, citation corrections and checking relating to cooperatives and bankruptcy papers. MINNESOTA SENATE INTERN Senator Steven G. Novak Legislative drafting; researched legislative issues; responded to constituent concerns; worked on developing computerized database system for office. 5 MINNESOTA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERN Representative Rick Krueger Coordinated daily office schedule and work; researched legislative issues; responded to constituent concerns; worked on developing computerized database systems for office. ADDITIONAL SKILLS Computer fluent in a variety of applications: Legal Research (WESTLAW and LEXIS) ; Word Processing (Microsoft WORD and IBM Wordperfect) and Database Management. Admitted to practice in Federal District Court since 1988. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Member of Minnesota Bar Association, American Agricultural Law Association, American Bar Association American Red Cross Volunteer; Vice- Chairperson St. Paul Chapter Safety Committee; Treasurer of Lakeville Jaycees ;, Minnesota Association for Children with Learning Disabilities volunteer; volunteer swim instructor for "The Bridge" program. SPECIAL INTERESTS Running, swimming, triathlons, travel, government, reading Elizabethan literature and the Bible. REFERENCES James T. Reuter Chisago County Attorney Chisago County Courthouse Center City, MN 55012 (612) 275 -1300 The Honorable J.B. Gunderson Judge of District Court Tenth Judicial District Chisago County Courthouse Center City, MN 55012 (612) 462 -7999 Donald B. Pedersen Director, Agricultural Law Program, Waterman Hall Fayetteville, AR 72701 (501) 575 -3706 Larry Bakken Hamline University School of Law 1536 Hewitt Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 (612) 641 -2 081 John Copeland Director, National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information. Waterman Hall Fayetteville, AR 72701 (501) 575 -7642 The Honorable Richard Krueger Minnesota House of Representatives 433 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296 -3201 (office) (612) 894 -2443 (home) J. W. (Jake) Looney Dean, University of Arkansas School of Law. Waterman Hall Fayetteville, AR 72701 (501) 575 -5601 r