Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990 07-23 & 07-26 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 23, 1990 and 4:30 P.M., Thursday, July 26, 1990 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 90 -16 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -13 (June 25, 1990) 2. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -14 (July 9, 1990) 3. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -15 (July 10, 1990) D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Proposed Policy For Sewer Fund Cash Balance 3. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: Hillside Center F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 8:20 P.M., On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License - Chi Chi's 2. 8:30 P.M., Cope Avenue and Ariel Street a. Detachment and Annexation b. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) C. Rezoning (4 Votes) d. Assessment Reduction G. AWARD OF BIDS H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Open Space I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Schedule Meeting To Review 1989 Annual Financial Report 2, Fitness Center Coverage 3. 2264 -2292 Larpenteur Avenue 4. Underground Storage Tank Permit Fee 5. Mechanical Permit Fees 6, Beaver Lake and Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plans 7. Speed Zone 8. Kennel License 9. Community Center Advisory Committee Appointments 10. Brooks Avenue Water Main, Project 88 -08 - Change Order Two 11. Condor Storm Sewer - Western Branch, Project 86 -01: Approve Plans 12. White Bear Avenue - Larpenteur to Frost, Project 89 -12: Approve Plans 13. County Road C - White Bear to Ariel, Project 86 -25: Schedule Assessment Hearing 14. Gervais Avenue - English to MnDOT Lab, Project 88 -14: Schedule Assessment Hearing 15. Southlawn Avenue - Beam to County Road D. Project 85 -17: Schedule Assessment Hearing 16. Budget Transfer - VEM Fund 17. Presentation 1991 Budget 18 • AMM Dues 19. City Hall Update J• VISITOR PRESENTATIONS K• COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. s. 9. 10. L• ADMINISTRATIVE pREgENTATIONS 1 • Charitable Gambling Ordinance 2. 3. 4. 5. M• ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, June 25, 1990 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 90 -13 A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers of the Maplewood City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, and was called to order by Acting Mayor Rossbach at 7 :00 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Norman G. Anderson, Mayor Absent Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present iA $ if ljDO None D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Edgerton Street 2. McKnight Overlay 3. Building Signage 4. Holloway Street 5. Gonyea's Oak Heights Storm Sewer - I -7 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All E. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed Item E -12 to become I -8 Council removed Item E -11 to become I -9 Acting Mayor Rossbach moved, seconded by Councilmember Zappa. to approve the Consent Agenda. Items 1 throueh_10 and 13 as recommended. Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Juker, Zappa 1. Approval of Claims: Nays - Councilmember Bastian ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 317,445.60 Checks: #10408 thru #10445 Dated: 6 -4 -90 thru 6 -12 -90 79.140.53 396,586.13 PAYROLL: 186,063.61 S 36.574.28 222,637.89 619,224.02 Checks: x/6283 thru #6434 Dated 6 -25 -90 Total Accounts Payable Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 1 6 -25 -90 2. Budget Transfer - Planning Commission Approved a budget transfer in the amount of $200 from the contingency account to cover higher than expected travel and training costs for the Planning Commission. 3. Sale of Tax - Forfeited Land Adopted the following resolutions authorizing Ramsey County to sell at public auction the tax- forfeited land described therein: 90 - 6 - 96 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by resolution dated February 20, 1990, classified as nonconservation land lying within the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the subject lands are described as Lot 6, Block 8, Farrell's Addition (PIN 36- 29 -22 -14 -0058) and WHEREAS, a certified copy of the classification resolution together with a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification and sale of the land classified in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, sub. 1; WHEREAS, State law requires the City of Maplewood to: (a) act on the county's classification of this property as nonconservation and (b) find that there is no pubic use that the property can be put to before Ramsey County can offer this property for public auction, and t NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the classification of the land shown on said list as nonconservation land and the sale thereof be and hereby is approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution in the tax - forfeited land section. 90 -6 -97 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by resolution dated February 20, 1990, classified as nonconservation land lying within the limits of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the subject lands are described as the North One -Half (N 1 /2) of vacated alley adjoining and the East 75 feet West 535 feet of Lot 1, Block 11, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul, (PIN 10- 29- 22 -44- 0052), and WHEREAS, a certified copy of the classification resolution together with a list of the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification and sale of the land classified in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, sub. 1; WHEREAS, State law requires the City of Maplewood to: (a) act on the county's classification of this property as nonconservation and (b) find that there is no pubic use that the property can be put to before Ramsey County can offer this property for public auction, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the classification of the land shown on 2 6 -25 -90 said list as nonconservation land and the sale thereof be and hereby is approved; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution in the tax - forfeited land section. 4. Conditional Use Permit Renewal: 1810 County Road B (Fulk) Approved renewal of a conditional use permit (CUP) for an M -1, light - manufacturing use, with in 350 feet of a residential zone, for a period of five years, subject to the previous conditions of approval. 5. Time Extension: Portable Sign Permit (Red Wagon Liquors) Approved a 20 -day time extension for a portable sign for Red Wagon Liquors at 2290 Maplewood Drive. 6. Administrative Overhead Charges - Improvement Projects Adopted the following resolution to begin charging public improvement projects for administrative overhead: 90 - 6 - 98 WHEREAS, significant administrative and financial management costs are associated with public improvement projects for costs incurred by the City Manager's office, City Clerk's Department and Finance Department; and WHEREAS, the financial management costs incurred on public improvement projects result from processing bills for payment, accounting and budget administration; and WHEREAS, many of these costs are incurred over a 20 -year period as this is the term of the special assessments and bond issues for public improvement projects; and WHEREAS, an administrative overhead charge equal to 2% of the project expenditures would be a reasonable charge to reimburse the General Fund for these administrative costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that all public improvement projects that have special assessments shall be charged monthly an administrative overhead charge equal to 2% of all expenditures for the current month on the project and that this amount shall be reimbursement to the City's General Fund for administrative costs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this policy be retroactive to January 1, 1990. 7. Interest on Developer Deposits Adopted the following resolution establishing a formal policy regarding City payment of interest on developer deposits and setting that rate at 5% simple interest: 90 -6 -99 WHEREAS, developers make cash deposits with the City of Maplewood to 3 6 -25 -90 guarantee the completion of grading, landscaping and other things necessary to complete their projects; and WHEREAS, it is fair and equitable to pay the developer a nominal amount of interest on their deposit, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that 5.0% simple interest be paid on all developer deposits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that interest earned up to $10 be kept by the City to cover accounting and processing of developer deposits. 8. Corporate resolution for Credit Cards at Wholesale Club Adopted the following resolution regarding purchases at the Wholesale Club: 90 -6 -100 WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood desires to obtain financial accommodations from INB National Bank pursuant to the use of a number of Bank's Credit Cards by the officers, agents, and employees of the City; and WHEREAS, the City intends that its officers, agents, and employees be authorized to use such Cards for corporate business; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City shall apply to Bank for issuance of a sufficient number of Cards as, in the judgment of the officer or officers hereinafter authorized, the City may require; RESOLVED FURTHER that Norman Anderson, the Mayor of the City of Maplewood, the City Manager, Michael McGuire, and the Secretary, Lucille Aurelius, hereby are authorized, directed, and empowered, in the name of the City, to apply to Bank for the issuance of such Cards and to execute such application forms and agreements as required by Bank to designate the officer, agents, and employees authorized to use such Cards, and to pay all indebtedness incurred by use of such Cards, whether authorized or unauthorized; RESOLVED FURTHER that Bank is authorized to,act upon this resolution until written notice of its revocation is delivered to Bank, and the authority hereby granted shall apply with equal force and effect to the successors in office to the officers herein named 9. Project 84 -14, Walter Street Budget Adjustment Approved a budget adjustment in the amount of $7,900 to cover higher than anticipated costs for Project 84 -14, Walter Street Improvements. 10. Reschedule Beam Avenue Public Hearing Adopted the following resolution scheduling the public hearing for Project 88 -12, Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to County Road D for July 9, 1990: 4 6 -25 -90 90 - 6 101 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to County Road D, city Project 88 -12, by construction of 36- foot -wide street, utilities, storm sewer, sidewalk, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to County Road D, City Project 88 -12, by construction of 36- foot -wide street, utilities, storm sewer, sidewalk, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $954,000. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 9th day of July, 1990, at 8:20 to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. 11. Change Order For Playcrest, Geranium and Sherwood Parks Discussed as Item I -9 12. U.S. Olympic Festival '90 Discussed as Item I -8 13. Skateboards Accepted the recommendation of the Director of Parks and Recreation that the City neither become involved in skateboarding activities nor invest in a skateboarding facility because of the heavy liability that would be incurred. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 p.m., Condor, Project 86 -01: Assessment Hearing a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report c. City Attorney reviewed the procedure for the hearing. 5 6 -25 -90 d. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the project being assessed. e. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents or opponents of the assessment. The following people expressed their objections to the proposed assessment: Dale Happe, representing Mary Anderson Homes Richard Martinson, 2455 Londin Lane Sue Schnarr, representing McKnight Townhomes Jerry Johnson, 2445 Dorland Lane Bob Warner, 2354 Dorland Lane f. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following_ resolution and moved its approval: 90 -6 -102 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Condor Storm Sewer -- Western Branch as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 86 -01, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems ,just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of twenty years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of nine (9.0) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1990. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 6 6 -25 -90 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the,intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended down the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker Nays - Councilmember Zappa h. Councilmember Bastian to review the appeals of the assessments on July 9. 1990 Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker Nays - Councilmember Zappa Councilmember Juker moved to return to EA. PRESENTATIONS: Item 1. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian On a voice vote, Ayes All M. PRESENTATIONS 1. Human Relations Commission Report - Re: John Glen Middle School a. Manager McGuire introduced Karla Sand, Chairperson of the Human Relations Commission, responding to the Council's request that the Commission investigate an incident that occurred at John Glenn Middle School on March 29, 1990. b. Ms. Sand reported on the revision of the Commission's original, preliminary, report to the Council. The Commission would like direction from the Council regarding whether they should initiate a dialogue with the District 622 School. Board about addressing these issues. c. Councilmember Bastian moved that Council accept the report and authorize the Human Relations Commission send a copy of the report to the newspaper, and tp proceed with a sensitivity training or any other program they can develop with the cooperation of the Council and the School Board with the provision that the Council be kept informed as You Fo.alon to see where support or input is needed Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - All 2. 7:30 p.m., Street Vacation: Netnorlin Court a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the public hearing regarding the proposed street vacation and address change of Netnorlin Court. 7 6 -25 -90 b c d Manager McGuire presented the staff report. Community Development Director Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. Vice -Mayor Rossbach called for proponents or opponents. The following person stated their views: Mack Nettleton, 2201 Woodlyn Avenue Ike Rutherford, 3048 Netnorlin Court Joe Peterson, 2223 Lydia Avenue e f Vice -Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing Councilmember Zappa introduced the following_ resolution and moved its approval: 90 -6 -103 WHEREAS, Mack Nettleton initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following- described property: Netnorlin Court WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: Lots 18, 19, 21, 22 and 23, Netnorlin Addition WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said street have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 18, 1989. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on January 8, 1990, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described street, public interest in the property will accrue to the following- described abutting properties: Lots 18, 19, 21, 22 and 23, Netnorlin Addition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis of the following findings of fact: 1. When the adjoining properties are replatted, the street right -of -way will not be used as an access to any of the abutting properties, 7 t 2. The adjoining property owners have no interest in improving the street, 3. This street segment will not be needed for area traffic circulation of emergency vehicle access. This vacation is subject to the retention of a 20 -by -50 -foot drainage and utility easement adjacent to Woodlynn Avenue and a 50- foot -wide ingress and egress easement from Woodlyn Avenue to the south end of the vacated cul -de -sac for the City to maintain the drainage area on Lot 21. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Juker, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Bastian 3. 7:45 p.m., Street Vacation: Harris Avenue a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the public hearing regarding the proposed vacation of two portions of Harris Avenue, between Hazelwood Street and Prosperity Road. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. C. Community Development Director Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents or opponents of vacation. Beverly Schwalbach, 2033 Prosperity Avenue, expressed her views. e. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption- 90 - 6 - 104 WHEREAS, the City Engineering Department applied for the vacation of the following described street segments: That part of the Harris Avenue right -of -way abutting the North line of Lot 2, Block 1, F. D. Nelson's Homesites and the Westerly 20 feet of the easterly 150 feet of the Harris Avenue right -of -way abutting the north line of Lot 1, Block 1, F. D. Nelson's homesites. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on June 4, 1990. They recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on June 25, 1990. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. 9 6 -25 -90 WHEREAS, after the vacation is approved, public interest in the property will accrue to the following abutting properties: t Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, F. D. Nelson's Homesites NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. There is no need for a public street in this location. 3. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 4. The adjoining property owners have no interest in having the street constructed. 5. It has been the City's policy to vacate unused rights - of -way whenever possible. This vacation is subject to the retention of a 30- foot -wide public utility easement. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All 4. 7:55 p.m., Holloway Avenue a. Plan Amendment (4 votes required) b. Street Vacation (4 votes required) 1. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding vacation of Holloway Avenue between Beebe Road and Furness Street (6th Street in N. St. Paul); and a plan amendment to make the vacation consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report 3. Community Development Director Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. 4. Commissioner Gerke presented the opinion of the Maplewood Planning Commission. 5. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents or opponents of the vacation. The following persons expressed their views: Bob Engwer, 2694 6th Avenue E, North St. Paul The resident of 2104 E. Cowern 6. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. 7. Councilmember Zappa moved that since 4 -votes are required, this item be tabled until Mayor Anderson returns. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All 5. 8 :10 p.m., Easement Vacation: 2242 White Bear Avenue 10 6 -25 -90 a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the public hearing regarding vacation of a 10- foot -wide drainage easement at the south end of 2242 White Bear Avenue. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. C. Community Development Director Olson presented the specifics. d. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents or opponents vacation. Steve Lonergan, representing the applicant, U -Haul, views. g. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. of the easement presented their h. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 -6 -105 WHEREAS, U Haul Company of Minnesota applied for the vacation of the following - described easement: The ten -foot -wide drainage easement lying North of and adjacent to the vacated alley in the Westerly 214.37 feet of Block 13, Smith and Taylor's Addition to North St. Paul. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this easement) signed a petition in favor of this vacation; 2. The Community Design Review Board discussed this vacation on June 5, 1990. They recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on June 25, 1990. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the vacation is approved, public interest in the property will accrue to the following abutting properties: 2242 White Bear Avenue Ramsey County Property Identification Number 11- 29 -22 -33 -0002 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. There is no need for the drainage easement since the storm sewer pipe is located in the vacated alley to the South. 11 6 -25 -90 Approval is subject to: r 1. The applicant providing documentation that the City has a drainage easement over the adjacent vacated alley, or 2. Dedicating a drainage easement to the City over the vacated alley. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All 1. Property, Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Finance Director Faust presented the specifics. C. Craig Morseth, Corporate Risk Managers, presented his analysis of the insurance proposals d. Councilmember Zappa moved to accent the staff recommendation as follows, with instruction to Finance Director to inform Council of the claims related to 4th of July Fireworks, 1. Property and Liability coverages be continued with the LMCIT because it is the lowest cost option; 2. Boiler Insurance be continued with Hartford and Workers Compensation with the LMCIT as these were the only proposals received; 3. Employee Bonds be renewed with United Fire and Casualty as the lower cost proposal from Auto Owners would require that 58 employees complete application forms. 4. The City will not purchase Umbrella or inverse condemnation coverage due to the high premium for a small amount of coverage. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - All 2. Beam Avenue Signals a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics of the bids d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: 90 -6 -106 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Collins Electrical Construction Company in the amount of 262,721.80 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Beam Avenue Signals, City Project 89 -15, and the Mayor and Clerk are 12 6 -25 -90 hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said y bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - All H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Design Review Board Appeal: Gall Avenue ( Seltun) This item was tabled from the June 11 meeting to allow meetings between the property owners to resolve their differences. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Community Development Director Olson presented the specifics. c. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents or opponents. The following persons presented their views: Vicki Seltun, 2474 Gall Avenue Bruce Mogren, Stillwater, MN d. Councilmember Bastian moved to approve the twin homes on Call Avenue for Desoto Associates, subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeating the design review process if construction has not begun within two years. 2. Restoring any adjacent property that may be damaged by this construction. 3. Submitting grading, drainage, utility and erosion plans to the City Engineer for approval. 4. Continually maintaining the building exteriors. 5. Verifying that Building B has a 30 -foot setback from the County Road D right -of -way. 6. Providing no more than an 18 -inch deck or step projection into any required setback. 7. Meeting all requirements of the driveway code. 8. A 2 -1/2 inch balled and burlapped tree shall be planted in the front yard of each unit on Gall Avenue. 9. The final color scheme shall be based on staff's approval. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - All e. Councilmember Bastian moved the Council direct staff to investigate and provide information to the Council regarding separating the small lot single dwellings and double dwellings into separate zoning districts. 13 6 -25 -90 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - All 2. PUD Termination: Cave's English Street 2nd Addition This item was tabled from June 11 to consider terminating part of the PUD for the 16 condominiums. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report b. Community Development Director Olson reviewed the specifics of the request. C. Commissioner Robert Cardinal of the Planning Commission presented the Commission recommendation. d. Sam Cave, Ed Cave and Sons, Inc, presented his views. e. Councilmember Juker moved to terminate the approval for the 16 condominiums and to approve an indefinite time extension for the small -lot single dwellings on English Street. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - All 3. Code Amendment: Motor Fuel Stations (2nd Reading, 4 votes required) a. Acting Mayor Rossbach presented the Ordinance for second reading. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to adopt the ordinance amending the Motor Fuel Station Ordinance: Ordinance No. 667 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOTOR FUEL STATION ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE USE OF UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS TANKS AND PIPING THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 36- 151(2) (i) (13) is amended as follows: 13. All new or replacement underground fuel storage tanks shall meet the standards of Minnesota Statutes and the standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Such tanks shall also have a UL listing appropriate for their use. In addition, installation plans shall be submitted to the State Fire Marshall's Office for approval. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - All 14 6 -25 -90 4. Code Amendment: Truth - Sale -of- Housing (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Community Development Director Olson presented the specifics. c. City Attorney Kelly discussed the legal aspects of the ordinance. d. Karen Christofferson, St. Paul Board of Realtors, presented information regarding disclosure. e. Councilmember Bastian moved this item be tabled to July 9 with direction to staff to return to Council with a "clean copy" of an ordinance with disclosure only. with a filine. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - All 5. Open Space and Wetlands a. Councilmember Zappa moved this item be tabled until Mayor Anderson returns. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Juker, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Bastian 6. Mall Area Traffic This item was tabled from the June 11 meeting with direction to staff to obtain additional information from the consultant. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report b. Public Works Director Haider presented the consultant information c. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item with instruction to staff to set up meetings) with Mall Area businesses. Minnesota and Ramsey County officials, and. possible_ the City of White Bear Lake and any other affected cities to discuss concerns, with the ultimate foal of those officials meeting with Council, perhaps in July or August, to devise a solution. Seconded Councilmember Zappa Ayes - All 7. City -Wide Watermain and Other Improvements a. Manager McGuire informed Council this was a fairly lengthy and complicated matter and they might wish to set a special meeting to consider it. b. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to table the item to a special meeting, on July 10, 1990. Councilmember Juker seconded the motion Ayes - All I. NEW BUSINESS 15 6 -25 -90 1. Footprint Lake Project: Plan Approval a. City Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics. c. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to table this item to the special meeting on July 10. 1990 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - All 2. Southlawn Drive and Maplewood Mall /Birch Run Intersection a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Public Works Director Haider presented the specifics proposal. d. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve placing 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of Southlawn Drive and the Maplewood Mall /Birch Run driveways. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All 3. Municipal State Aid Streets On June 11 Council requested a report on the amount of state aid lost in past year because of work not done. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the details of this report. C. Acting Mayor moved to table to the special meeting July 10, 1990 Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - All 4. Keller Parkway /County Road C Water Main, Project 88 -10: Accept Project a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the project. C. Councilmember Juker moved to accept the project Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All 5. County Road D Shoulder Paving Agreement a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the agreement C. Councilmember Zappa moved to enter into an agreement with Ramsey County for City 16 6 -25 -90 cost participation in shoulder pavinc on County Road D Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - All N G City Hall Update a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented details of progress on the building addition, Change Order 6 and retainage information. C. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to approve Change Order 6 covering miscellaneous electrical and alarm items. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Juker and Zappa Nays - Councilmember Bastian d. Councilmember Bastian moved to reduce the retainage to two and one -half percent Councilmember Zappa seconded the motion Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Bastian and Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker Gonyea's Oak Heights On June 11 Council rejected Gonyea's offer of $47,000 in lieu of construction of a storm sewer outlet from Pond 15 to Pond 16. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report b. Councilmember Zappa moved to accent Gonyea's offer of $57.600 for the storm sewer. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian US Olympic Festival '90 - E -12 from Consent Agenda Ayes - All On June 11th Council requested information regarding what the City is doing to participate and promote the U.S. Olympic Festival '90. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report c. Councilmember Bastian moved the Citv take no additional action Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Bastian and Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker 9. Playcrest, Geranium and Sherwood Parks (Change Order) - E -11 from Consent Agenda 17 6 -25 -90 a. Councilmember Zappa stated he had removed this item from the Consent Agenda because of concerns about the cost and necessity of the work. b. Councilmember Bastian moved the nark maintenance crew take immediate steps to ensure safety in the eroded areas with instruction to staff to investigate additional alternatives for corrective work. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Councilmember Juker moved to extend the meeting until last four items on the agenda have been dealt with Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS None K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1 2 3 LI Edgerton Street a. Councilmember Juker asked what work Ramsey County is doing on Edgerton Street, from Roselawn north to County Road B, and stated it is causing drainage problems for the residents there. b. Director of Public Works Haider responded that he would check on it. McKnight Overlay a. Councilmember Bastian asked when the final overlay would be done on McKnight Road. b. Director of Public Works Haider will check with obtain a schedule for completion. Building Signage a. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct staff to investigate rearrangement of sienaee on the building so that one end has "City Hall" and the other end Police" Seconded by Councilmember Juker Holloway Street Ayes - All Ayes - All a. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to put Holloway Street on the July 9 agenda for discussion of possible reconsideration. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - All L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS None 18 6 -25 -90 Councilmember Zappa moved to adjourn the meeting at 10;37 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian Ayes - All City Clerk 19 6 -25 -90 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, July 9, 1990 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 90 -14 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M., by Acting Mayor Rossbach. B. ROLL CALL George F. ROSSbach, Acting Mayor Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -11 (May 31, 1990) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -11 (May 31, 1990) as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -12 (June 11, 1990) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -12 June 11, 19901 as corrected: Page 14, Item H -9, 3rd Line - delete "for Staff to" Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Special Meeting (June 20, 1990) Councilmember Juker moved to approve the Minutes of June 20, 1990,as submitted. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to approve the agenda as amended: 1. Brooks Food 2. Dutch Elm Disease 3. Cable TV Schedule 1 7 -9 -90 4. County Road Projects 5. Erosion Control 6. Storm Damage Assessment 7. Park Addresses 8. Olympic Medalists 9. County /Civil Service Meeting 10. Rolling Hills Zoning Follow Up 11. Fitness Center Coverage for Councilmembers 12. Memo - Frank's Addition 13. 2373 Gall 14. L -2 Procedure for Filling Council Vacancy Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. E. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Zappa moved, seconded by Councilmember Bastian, Ayes - all., to approve the Consent Agenda Item E -1 through 6 as recommended: 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE; 454,612.97 Checks # 5872 thru if 10511 Dated 5 -30 -90 thru 6 -27 -90 S 127,298.05 Checks # 6446 thru # 6620 Dated 7 -9 -90 581,911.02 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: 188,762.18 Payroll Checks S 36,116.37 Payroll Deductions 806,789.57 GRAND TOTAL 2. Financial Transfers - 1989 Bond Issue Approved the following 1990 transfers: A) From the Street construction State Aid Fund to the Public Improvement Projects Fund for the following projects: 45,000 87 -04 McKnight Rd. Phase II Larpenteur to 36 153,050 87 -05 McKnight Rd. Phase III Beaver Lake to Conway 21,322 85 -26 Cope Avenue - Hazel to Ariel 18,608 88 -11 Ariel Street - County Rd. B to Cope Avenue 2 7 -9 -9 299.580 88 -14 Gervais - English to Kennard 537,560 B) From the Sewer Fund to the Public Improvement Projects Fund for the following projects: 98,650 87 -05 McKnight Rd. Phase III Beaver Lake to Conway 4.780 84 -14 Walter Street 103,430 C) From the Hydrant Charge Fund to the Public Improvement Projects Fund for the following project: 4,650 85 -26 Cope Avenue - Hazel to Ariel 3. Sergeants' Settlement Approved the following Sergeants' Settlement: The current agreement calls for a wage and insurance reopener on January 1, 1990. In settlement of this reopener, the City proposes a 48 wage increase over the 1989 pay equity base ($125 per month) effective January 1, 1990. 4. Supplement to MSA Contract Approved a salary increase of $200.00 per month for the Assistant Finance Officer effective January 1, 1990, and approved the necessary budget transfers. S. Budget Transfer: T -Sall Program Approved the additional $1600.00 in expenditures for the T -Ball Program offset by additional revenue) as follows: 101 - 603 -238 4020 $ 150.00 101 - 603 -238 4120 1,450.00 6. Cope Avenue - Craig to Ariel, Project 85 -26, Accept Project Resolution 90 - 7 - 107 WHEREAS, the City Manager for the City of Maplewood has determined that Cope Avenue, Craig to Ariel, City Project 85 -26, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 85 -26 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the City. Release of any retainage or escrow is hereby authorized. 3 7 -9 -90 FURTHERMORE, the budget is revised as follows: Special Assessments $320,688 Hydrant Fund 42,705 MSA Street Construction 158,250 General Obligation 54.300 Total 4575,943 F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Variance: Burke Avenue (Svendsen) a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Marion Svendsen and Donald Kaiser for a lot area variance of 600 square feet to sell a 9400 square foot lot for construction of a single family home. The property is located on Burke Avenue west of White Bear Avenue. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the request and the Planning Commission recommendation. d. Marion Svendsen, the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. f. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 -7 - 108 WHEREAS, Marion Svendsen and Donald Kaiser applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance at the 1700 block of Burke Avenue. The legal description is: Lots 26 and 27, Block One of Kredel's Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, Section 36 -69 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a home on a 9,400 square foot lot. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 600 square feet. 4 7-9-9k. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 18, 1990. They recommended to the City Council that the variance be approved. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on July 9, 1990. City Staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration because: a. A single - family home is a reasonable use of this lot. b. The plight of the property owners is due to circumstances unique to the property and they did not create the conditions. C. Since the lot is similar in width and area to other lots in the neighborhood, this proposal will not alter its essential characteristics. d. There is not additional property available to the applicants to increase the lot area. 2. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. ' Seconded by Councilmember ROSSbach. Ayes - all. 2. 7:10 P.M., Highway 61 from Highway 36 to County Road C a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Rezonings (4 Votes) 1. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding proposing several changes to the City's land use plan and zoning map in the area west of Highway 61 between County Road C and Highway 36. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 5 7 -9 -90 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal and presented the Planning Commission recommendation. 4. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for opponents and proponents. None were heard. 5. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to table this item until there is a five - member Council. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3.7:30 P.M., Highway 61 from County Road C to Beam Avenue a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Rezonings (4 Votes) 1. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal of a land use plan amendment from OS (open space) to BW (business warehousing) for the property on the northwest corner of County Road C and Highway 61 and a proposal to rezone from M -1 (light manufacturing) to F (farm residential) for the area west of Highway 61 between County Road C and Beam Avenue. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal and presented the Planning Commission recommendation. 4. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for opponents and proponents. None were heard. 5. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to table this item to the next meeting where there is a five - member Council. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Bastian and Juker. Nay - Councilmember Zappa. 4 7:50 P.M., Highway 61 from Beam Avenue to County Road D a. Plan Amendment (4 Votes) b. Rezonings (4 Votes) 1. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to study the areas where the land use plan and the zoning maps do not agree. The area of study for 0 7 -9-9( ". this item is west of Highway 61, between County Road D and Beam Avenue. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal and also presented the Planning Commission recommendation. 4. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for persons who wished to be heard for or against the proposal. The following were heard: Paul Bachman, 1200 Beam Marilyn Vars, 1140 Beam Jo Prokosch, 1272 E. County Road D 5. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. 6. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to refer this item to the Planning Commission to readdress the proposal and to refer to the testimony given by the area residents. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Tractor with Mower a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 7 - 109 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Long Lake Ford Tractor, Inc., in the amount of $35,788, is the lowest responsible bid for furnishing one (1) all- purpose tractor with flail mowers, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY rejects the bid of $8900 for the trade -in of Maplewood Unit 564, a 1980 International tractor with mowers. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all.- H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 2. Condor Storm Sewer - Project 86 -01: Assessment Appeals Review a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 7 7 -9 -90 b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the appeals. e. Councilmember Zappa moved to accent the staff recommendation and deny the following anneals: Jerry Johnson, 2445 Londin Lane #208 12- 28 -22 -21 -0036 Richard D. Martinson, 2455 Londin Lane #214 12- 28 -22 -21 -0042 Susan M. Schnarr, McKnight Townhomes Stephen Jelinek, 2355 Dorland Place Candice S. Klein, 2283 Pond Avenue Emil M. Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane #321 12- 28 -22 -21 -0073 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 3. Birmingham -Frost Storm Sewer a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented alternative methods to help solve the drainage problems in this area. C. Councilmember Zappa moved to accent staff's recommendation and approved alternate No. 3. "Install a dry sumo instead of a storm sewer." Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for a five minute recess. Acting Mayor Rossbach reconvened the meeting at 8:20 P.M. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 5. 8:20 P.M., Public Hearing - County Road D to Beam Avenue, Project 88 -12 (4 Votes) a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposal to construct Beam Avenue through to County Road D. The Council had previously ordered this project, but time limit has expired and it necessitates Council reordering the project. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Public Works presented the history and specifics of the proposal. d. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for proponents. The following were heard: Mr. Frank Frattalone, the developer. 8 7 -9 -9r. e. Acting Mayor Rossbach called for opponents. The following expressed their opinions: Resident at 2994 Carey Heights Drive Mrs. Barrett, 1176 E. County Road D Marilyn Vars, 1140 Beam Avenue, asked if a letter from the former owner at 1166 Beam was received. Mr. Shane, 1241 Beam Avenue Arthur Mahnke, 1210 Beam Avenue Paul Bachman, 1200 Beam Avenue Resident at 2993 Carey Heights Drive Patrick O'Brien, 2961 Edward f. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Project. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Councilmember Juker withdrew her second. Motion died for lack of a second. h. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to table this item until Aucust 13, 1990 Meeting when there will be a five - member Council. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. A. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued) 1. Code Amendment: Truth In Housing (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to delete No. 2 from Page 10 and insert it in Page 14 as No. 81. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. c. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 668 AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING TRUTH -IN -SALE OF HOUSING THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Article XIi, Truth -in -Sale of Housing Ordinance, is hereby added to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances. Article XII. Truth -in- Sale -of- Housing Ordinance 9 7 -9 -90 Sec. 9 -235. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to promote decent, safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations. To help - accomplish this, the City is requiring the disclosure of housing information and defects as a condition of the sale of housing. City inspectors may use this information to require the correction of code violations in rental housing only. Sec. 9 -236. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following terms are defined as follows: Adequate water flow: Enough pressure to maintain at least a 1/4 -inch diameter (pencil- sized) flow of water from each of at least three or more plumbing fixtures at the same time. Contractual agreement: An agreement, written or otherwise, between a buyer and seller for the conveyance of, or the intent to convey, all or a part of a housing unit or residential building. A contractual agreement shall include, but not be limited to, an earnest money contract, deed or purchase agreement. Housing unit: A single dwelling, a double - dwelling unit, a town house unit, a condominium unit (as defined by Minnesota Statutes), or any other attached housing unit designed for the occupancy of one family. A housing unit shall not include a manufactured home. owner: A person having a vested interest in the housing unit or residential building in question. This includes his or her duly - authorized agent or attorney, before a sale. Residential building: A building containing one or more housing units. Sale: The conveyance of a housing unit or residential building to a new owner. Sec. 9 -237. Applicability. This article shall not apply to any newly constructed housing or residential building when the title is conveyed to the first owner, except that no owner shall convey or contract to convey a newly- constructed housing unit or residential building without first providing to the buyer: 1. A list of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all contractors and subcontractors who constructed the building. 2. The items in Section 9 -238 (b) (2) (a, b, c, e, f, g, h and i). Sec. 9 -238. Truth -in- Sale -of- Housing Disclosure Report. a) An owner shall not show a housing unit or residential building to a prospective buyer without publicly displaying and making 10 7- 9- 9 ";I'- available a truth -in- sale -of- housing disclosure report. This report shall be at the housing unit or residential building at the time of showing and within three days of listing. A copy of the disclosure report shall be issued to the buyer before the execution of a contractual agreement. A copy of such report must be filed within 15 days with the City to be valid. A double filing fee shall be collected by the City if the report is not filed within 15 days. b) A housing disclosure report must be on the form prepared by the City. It shall include: 1) An evaluation by a City- certified housing inspector of specific parts of the building and property listed on the housing disclosure report. This list shall include, but not be limited to, items address in the housing maintenance, siding and junk removal ordinances. The City shall be responsible for determining whether there is an ordinance violation. 2) A signed statement by the owner that includes the following information: a. Any damage to the building or its contents by flooding or sewer backup and any evidence of chronic water seepage of which the owner has knowledge. b. The nature, extent and cause of any water seepage or flooding of any portion of the property. c. Whether or not there are pending housing orders from the City about the property. d. Whether there is a homestead classification for real estate taxes payable. e. Any other known defects or problems that are not visible. f. Any deed restrictions or covenants running with the property. g. Whether the property is subject to the City's pipeline, shoreland or flood plain ordinances. h. The location and status of all known wells, including a map, stating whether the well is in use or abandoned and sealed. 11 7 -9 -90 i. Whether the property is next to a high - voltage transmission line. If so, the disclosure form shall include the following statement: "This property is next to a high - voltage (69,000 volts or more) electric transmission line. Purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on adverse exposure to a magnetic field generated by high - voltage lines. As of May 1990, no risk assessments have been made by scientific or health officials to resolve the health effects of long or short term exposures to magnetic fields. Purchasers with concerns about the exposures should contact competent medical or health inspectors or agencies for current risk assessment information. c) A truth -in -sale of housing disclosure report shall be valid for no more than one year from the date of approval by the City. However, if there is substandard maintenance or subsequent damage to the building, the Director of Community Development may require a new inspection. Sec. 9 -239. Limitations. a) In making a housing inspection, the inspector shall consider any concealed facilities to be adequate. The inspector shall base his or her evaluation on the functional operation of the facility and the condition of the equipment that is viewed. No other warrant is expressed or implied. b) No one shall consider anything in a truth -in- sale -of- housing disclosure report to imply that a residential building or housing . unit meets all minimum building standards. In addition, no one shall consider anything in the report to imply a warrant of the condition of the housing evaluated. The inspector warrants that he or she has used reasonable care and diligence in inspecting and evaluating the building. Sec. 9 -240. Certificate of Competency. a) No person shall fill out a truth -in- sale -of- housing disclosure report without having a valid certificate of competency. The City must issue the certificate of competency. The City will only approve housing inspectors that have passed competency tests as truth -in- housing evaluators in St. Paul. The housing inspectors must submit certification papers to Maplewood from the City of St. Paul as truth -in- housing evaluators. The City of Maplewood must license each housing inspector that works in the City. Maplewood will automatically revoke a housing inspector's license if it is revoked in St. Paul. The City of Maplewood may require the passing of a test that shows the inspector's knowledge of the City's housing code. The City may then issue a certificate of 12 7- 9- 9f`. "` competency which is valid for one year. The city may issue renewals of all such certificates. If a certificate of competency lapses for one year or more, the person who held such certificate shall reapply to Maplewood for renewal of such certificate. No holder of a certificate of competency shall allow another person to use said certificate. b) The City Council may revoke the certificate of competency of a housing inspector for cause. At least ten days before the hearing, the City shall send written notification to the mailing address used in the inspector's application. The notice shall list the date, time and place of the hearing and of the specific reasons for suspension. The Community Development Director may, at his or her discretion, suspend the certificate of competency of a housing inspector pending a suspension hearing. c) The City council shall set up a fee schedule by resolution for issuing a certificate of competency to approved housing inspectors. Sec. 9 -241. Insurance. a) No certificate of competency shall be issued or renewed without satisfactory proof of insurance insuring the applicant /evaluator. b) The City shall be included as a named insured on the required insurance and any additional cost for including the City shall be at the expense of the applicant /evaluator. c) The applicant's /evaluator's insurance shall remain in force continuously thereafter and no certificate of competency shall be deemed to be in effect during any period of time when such insurance and proof thereof are not also in effect. d) Each applicant /evaluator shall have an individually -named insurance policy. e) The insurance policy shall provide coverage of not less than 250,000 per claim or $500,000 per year, aggregate, against any and all liability imposed by law resulting from the performance of the duties as a certified Truth -in -Sale of Housing evaluator. Sec. 9 -242. Housing Evaluation Fees. The City Council shall set up a fee schedule by resolution for the filing of truth -in- sale -of- housing disclosure reports. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 1991, and shall sunset on June 30, 1992. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 13 7 -9 -90 d. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 7 - 110 WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Truth -in- Sale -of- Housing Ordinance; WHEREAS, such ordinance requires the filing of certain forms and the issuance of certificates of competency to approved housing inspectors; and WHEREAS, there is administrative time required for this work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a fee of $15 for each truth -in- sale-of- housing disclosure report be required at the time of filing and 74 for the issuance of a certificate of competency. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. H.R.A. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented a report regarding the Council's request to investigate the feasibility of incorporating the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (H.R.A.) into the Planning commission. c. No action taken. 2. H.R.A. Appointment a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to reappoint Tom Connelly to a five year term on the H.R.A. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes - all. 3. Seal Coat Project a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to authorize staff to proceed with a seal coating protect in lieu of the overlay program in the Harvester Avenue area. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 14 7 -9 -9 1 4. Final Report of Fire Services Study a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Joker moved to accept the Fire Services Study presented by Carroll Buraiker and Associates and the recommendations of the Fire Services Study Committee and that the Committee be continued and the report be concluded with the June 20, 1990 Minutes. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — all. 5. Holloway Avenue, Beebe Road to McKnight Road, Project 87 -14. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 -7 -111 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Holloway Avenue — Beebe Road to McKnight, City Project 87 -14, by construction of 44 -feet wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, utilities, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Holloway Avenue — Beebe Road to McKnight, City Project 87 -14, by construction of 44 -feet wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, utilities, and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $390, 350. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 13 day of August, 1990, at 7:10 P.M. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — all. 6. Highwood/McKnight Outlet Project 90 -10: Schedule Public Hearing a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 15 7 -9 -90 b. Councihnember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ZI)dmm WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Highwood/McKnight Outlet, City Project 90 -10, by construction of storm sewer and pond acquisition and development, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on Highwood/McKnight Outlet, City Project 90 -10, by construction of storm sewer and pond acquisition and development is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $370,000. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 13' day of August, 1990, at 7:00 P.M., to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes — Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councilmembers Juker and Zappa. Nay — Councihnember Bastian. 7. 1991 Budget Meetings a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 16 7 -9 -90 b. Council established a date of August 16, 1990, at 4:30 P.M., to meet regarding the 1991 Budget. 8. Request For Reduced Speed Limits, Woodlynn Between McKnight and White Bear Avenue a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Safety Collins stated a petition has been presented to reduce the speed on Woodlynn from 40 MPH to 30 MPH. c. Acting Mayor Rossbach moved to refer this matter to staff to investigate the legality of the Citv reducing the speed limit and report back at the July 23, 1990 Meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 9. Request From Citizen (Dana Hebert) a. Manager McGuire stated Mr. and Mrs. Dana Hebert asked to appear before the Council to discuss a problem they are having with the construction of a new porch. b. Mr. Dana Hebert, 1189 Glendon, explained his problems. c. Marjorie Ostrom, Building Official, explained that the porch has to be constructed according to the U.B.C. d. Councilmember Zappa moved to take no action as advised by the City Attornev that the U.B.C. cannot be waived. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 10. City Hall Front Door Signage a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the replacement of the sionage on the front of the building to read "City Hall" and place signageon the front door to read: Office Hours 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. Monday - Friday After Office Hours and Weekends Use East Entrance Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes - all. 17 7 -9 -90 c. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve a budget transfer from the Contingency Account of $75.00 for the front panel signage and $32.00 for the front door signage. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes - all. 11. Open Space Wetlands a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item for two weeks. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 12. Erosion Control a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to approve a chance order with Enebak Construction in an amount not to exceed $12,600 for sod at Playcrest, Geranium, and Sherwood Parks. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach.Ayes - Acting Mayor Rossbach Councilmembers Bastian and Juker. Nay - Councilmember Zappa. 13. City Hall Update a. Director of Public Works brought the Council up to date regarding the City Hall expansion. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to accept the report and referred to Staff to explore the feasibility of moving the evergreen trees that are too close together at the northwest corner. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Brooks Food a. Councilmember Juker questioned what conditions were approved for the strip center at English and 36, especially the Brooks store as they are open 24 hours. 18 7 -9 -9C' b. Acting Mayor Rossbach referred the matter to staff to investigate the original conditions, the site plan approved, etc., for that center. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes — all. 2. Dutch Elm Program a. Councilmember Bastian stated he has noticed the marking of trees again this year. Do we have a program this year? b. Staff stated the Dutch Elm disease program has started. 3. Cable T.V. Schedule a. Councilmember Bastian questioned what Council meetings will be televised. b. Staff stated there will be six meetings televised for this year. c. Councilmember Bastian moved that the first Council meeting of the month will be on cable. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach: Ayes — Acting Mayor Rossbach, Councihnembers Bastian and Zappa. Nay — Councilmember Juker. Councilmember Bastian moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and continue the meeting until the agenda is finished. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — all. 4. County Road Project a. Councilmember Bastian moved to instruct staff to prepare a list of all current county road projects. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes — all. 5. Erosion Control a. Councilmember Bastian stated erosion is taking place on several area properties such as Beam Avenue, English and Highway 36, and County Road C. b. Staff will investigate. 6. Storm Damage Assessment a. Councilmember Bastian questioned what damage occurred in Maplewood from the Sunday A.M. storm. 19 7 -9 -90 b. Staff stated trees, power lines were damaged, plus several houses in the Kohhnan Lake Overlook Addition sustained damage. Director of Emergency Management Code will supply a list. 7. Park Addresses a. Acting Mayor Rossbach requested and moved that addresses be given to park locations or anything that is now identified by name only. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — all. 8. Olympic Medalists a. Acting Mayor Rossbacb moved to instruct staff to send a letter of commendation to the Maplewood Olympic Medalists. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. 9. Concil/Police Civil Service Meeting a. Councilmember Zappa questioned when this meeting could take place. b. Council stated a date could be set after there is a five- member council. 10. Rolling Hills Zoning Follow Up. a. Councilmember Zappa questioned what the status of the zoning of the Rolling Hills property and the property north to Larpenteur. b. Staff stated a formal hearing is set for the last meeting in August. 11. Fitness Center Coverage for Councilmembers a. Councilmember Zappa questioned if Councihnembers could join the City's Fitness Center. b. Councilmember Joker moved to refer this matter to staff to investigate. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — all. 12. Memo —Frank's Addition a. Councilmember Zappa questioned if the property that Frank's Nursery Addition is on is the same as the property the City was interested in buying. b. Staff to investigate. 20 7 -9 -90 13. 2373 Gall a. Councilmember Zappa stated he had received a letter regarding storm damage. b. No action taken. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION 1. Gambling Ordinance a. Council tabled this item for two weeks. 2. Procedures for Filling Council Vacancies a. City Attorney Pat Kelly explained the procedures for filling council vacancies. M. ADJOURNMENT 10:52 P.M. City Clerk 21 7 -9 -90 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 4:30 P.M., Tuesday, July 10, 1990 Community Room, Municipal Building Special Meeting No. 90 -15 A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood was held in the Community Room, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 4:37 P.M., by Acting Mayor Rossbach. S. ROLL CALL George F. Rossbach, Acting Mayor Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present C. PRESENTATIONS City Manager McGuire requested that the two presentation items on the Agenda be reviewed in reverse order since the consultant for the second item, Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87 -32, was present at the meeting. It was the consensus of the Council to hear Project 87 -32 first, followed by Project 90 -07. 2. Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87 -32: Approve Plans and Authorize NSA Off - System Expenditures a. City Engineer Ken Haider presented the staff report. b. City Finance Director Dan Faust presented a proposed policy for sewer fund cash balance and proposed financing methods for Projects 87 -32 and 90 -07. c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 -7 -113 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on November 20, 1989, plans and specifications for Footprint Lake outlet and Miscellaneous Improvements, Project 87 -32, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby 1 7 -10 -90 approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council on the 27th day of July, 1990, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, for 59 of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of August 13, 1990. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes - all. d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 7 - 114 WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. Nos. 25 and 64 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 138- 108 -05. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $197,250 (estimated) to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this authorization. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes - all. Acting Mayor Rossbach called a ten minute recess at 6:05 P.M. Acting Mayor Rossbach reconvened the meeting at 6:17 P.M. 2 7 -10 -90 1. City -Wide water Main Extensions and Miscellaneous Improvements, Project 90 -07: Schedule Public Hearing a. Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish presented the staff report. b. Councilmember 2appa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 7 - 115 WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to City -Wide Water Main Extensions and Miscellaneous Improvements, City Project 90 -07, by construction of water main and services together with sanitary sewer and services, storm sewer, and streets where applicable, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed City -Wide Water Main Extensions and Miscellaneous Improvements, City Project 90 -07, by construction of water main and services together with sanitary sewer and services, storm sewer, and streets where applicable is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $5,371,000. 3. A series of public hearings will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, September 17; Tuesday, September 18; Wednesday, September 19; and Thursday, September 20, 1990, each from 7:00 to 9:00 P.M., to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach. Ayes - all. 1. Mayor Vacancy 3 7 -10 -90 a. Following some discussion, Councilmember Zappa nominated Councilmember Bastian for the vacant position of Mayor. The nomination was seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. b. The official swearing -in will be conducted at the regular City council meeting on Monday, July 23, 1990. 2. Council Vacancy a. Following some discussion, Councilmember Zappa moved that a Special Council Meeting be scheduled for Monday, July 16 1990. at 5:00 P.M., for the purpose of council vacancy appointment. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. b. Acting Mayor Rossbach and City Manager McGuire were instructed to invite Mr. Dale Carlson, the candidate from the last municipal election who had the next highest total vote, to interview with the City council at the July 16th Meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:26 P.M. City Clerk 4 7 -10 -90 r At ' i i AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: July 16 1990 AGENDA NO, E -1 Action by Counci,1v Endorse Modified.,, ReJ ectec, Date It is recommended that the Council approvepp payment of the following claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 0806,108.32 Checks 10512 thru # 10583 Dated 6 -28 -90 thru 7 -11 -90 93 Chec # 6630 thru # 6751 Dated 7 -23 -90 899 Total er attachedached voucher /check register PAYROLL: 194,428.83 Payroll Checks 827.12 Payroll Deductions 231 Total Payroll 19131,137.63 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing f these claims,lams. tmc J C' U C1-1 k C. I L W V C1 U it.. H E R FOR 'l-..ti' +:1 rte, Z.!i CHECK -v i.;.q I) i - % - N JIJ: Ch 13"4 t K 1.1 L : ii V E JV tvJtYi N Um, DA t h. i, m E.- ) C NAML u5j J. ij p I 4040 06 0 I F - f I r .= ,:,+ CL R K OF I si C R'9 EREI.L. f A Y A L L C) 5 9 DA L. C1 I 2 ) tj PROGRAM FEESEDI o.j R CJ G R A .14 5 1-;- L r T Y C; A0/9 S. U G-- F CJ A 0 5 i 6 • k3 9 L) C E.-:3 Cj R 'i L R V 1 C N V i. NAY 11t-A1.1X11' E R c P A rsMNLCFj I A F r. L--' E JFt FE ESE.:i j 10 5, a R V I c rr _ E E cu6i :. /9U 541400 A W A i* o tj jj C I C1 N C,"N rRAL8, / 9u m x lvj s t. T R f A'.; Uo5zo 41401) VL.1-1 LIC: AU6PYABLL01NNfTEfEA0 7 5, 1 u o 06/2 !TA r k4 L I 0 2 NU C:Hk IS 1 1 Nk: PAYA61-E 19 04. 6 0 U 105- ..'100 i / 9 9 EA bNk L I C SL PE E ., 3 FAYA OLE1 , , S---r crjijNl'y Flaf' DEr"I F 0 1 U524 E Es-J C . E E I Im f1 6 u 0 6 v E E RE E L:-' I C .I U 5 Z U J i t F Ij R I C; L .A"90 LIVE 6AI f ::t`c, fi r j. 6 2 9 C I R PA VAC LE 4W 52 a 601•Z5 06/Zy FELL F ZOE r(V, 1rI I U PIALI)ONADU 5- 9 1 L 54 1400 06 9 9 o m Mbb L A NCL - 9 1 55 3 u k E A 4 4 01 (J A VLAC61N . N ., r /. 1 @ A Y A ' LEAL - R 54' 400 MI1Y Yt ISTA'J.- LIC F PAYxL, M (I 1 -1 L M A M 1) ji N I A 10. Cii 7 U 3 1-00. 10O.0 3J5. o J3 195. v 200.0 700.00 700.0c) 994 . J9 077. 334.5() 49. ot 32o. 6tu9zluu 63 28 . ( 4 t ) o 1' #0 • 6 963 o 17th. U0 74i « PA6E j C HF- C K AMOUNT AIP,QUI% U8.50 46.0 I Y5 - 79 375.0 036. Z9795,00 i 49 1994.39 10,07- 334,50 37,10 . 00of 53 799307. 170. 82,00 741.00 V 0 U C. H R'E'G 0 7 1 1' I '+ C I;D: 415 11 A L 1#.:. W 't i ; D R L I -'EFL' F' 13 R r`,E i f 1) D VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMVER 1053 10533 10534 10535 10536 10537 10538 10539 10540 1054 t 105.42 1 054- 1 10546 10547 10548 10549 1 055 0 10551 10552. 10554 10 VENbOR N U V; d E' R 541400 1 () I ;a5A 0 709740 711360 9 4 0 -5 0,". 780; 50 320500 711 50140() 541400 5- 4 1 1 400 061900 9 U0001 131500 140400 5101.00 94Z070 541400 541400 061.000 84.3 00 t, 1'l 55 0 C. H 1. C K VEND--)R 1) A T'E NAME 07/OZ/90 MINN. STit-Iii TREASURL-R 0 7 0 0 BU R TO N SC; 0 T T 0 1 02 PAL11I.-R, JOHN IVAN 0f /0 ../90 P E T'L R 3 0 N 9 R IJ l-S 07/02/90 WE06LW0(1D,JAl"LS U'!* /0 90 SAWYER I CHIaRYL 07/03/90 GRCILI . P HEALTH INC.. 0 3 9 0 PHYSICI,4NS "LALTH P L. A N U T 0 3 9 0 MA01a'SON NA'Tll'.'lNAL LIFE 07/03/9) MINN. STA TRLASSURCR 07/03/90 MINN . 7 %S'FA TREA;..SlJRE'R 0-1 /03 191.1 BA"I"F.RY TIkL WARi--.lij)dcE 0 T 10 :'1 19 UN I CR! : I ;, y M N I 07 /05/9k) CI I Y CO UN T Y Lf!Pt. ri Y E, 9 7/ t) 5 19 0 C L F D I I C T C 0 IJ R T 07/05/90 MAP't-t- LEAV OFF I C I AL i7 . / 0 6 / 9 o WILD MOUNTAIN 0 / 5 / v M1114N. LSTAIL 07/ 19 0 ff; I -N N . F A T E E- A S t JRZE- R BA -t C. K j 0 H;;'4 0 L h N 01 /U5 /v S T r r F. N, 0 7 0 9C N ci r U E '.5 (ER 5-TATF. DRIVER- LIC FE LS PAYjQ-lL(-.. VOR 'S ER% V I C L kV I L E L FUR c . E HCIIA DLDLIC] O N P YIA HEALTH I.- IFE DENTAL lN---*.-')(JRAN(.-E AIR I N 1.1 HA N C L. C 0 N N U A N f.l- 4 C. M A 0 '= itj C. f -, j\ AY IN:p. DLDLJC,*1*10,,\l:j HEAL FH LI F ;)V IN'SURANCE AIR INt ORANCE CO N I N d A N (.- 1" D. I A4INSiJRAi CE MO Of-I VLrl LIC I L E P A Y 'A B L r A I" C J f I V IR S Lit' l,-' • VE H I EAES y o R I V i . - li " L I Of Y!,i-'LE S F U f 8 V I FEES il:'OR 11 I'Cl R V E, PAY. VAIE !)RlllkARS LIC. =•.:' " -' PAYAL"LE C R 619 4 0 U N T 6 6 5 0 fj A.. 0 0 6*0 .00 4 0 0 31LO. 00 u 1 977 . 4886. 7 369.61 727. 1 - 65.50 0 654. 8-8 1 049 . 950 16 Z6 u r . c ,i1 615.00 00 i ut) 0u 6tl. 00 4 ie,316 50 4::. I -4L v Jl 4 Z j"[13 uu 35 4 0 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 68:3 .50 160 . 0 0 60(,-).Oo 452.00 3 Z () . 00 1 2 5 . U U 13,033.93 13 1 9 916.%:6 159870.5U 615.00 100.00 65.00 118.00 4,w35. 42.50 it' *cj 1 - 4 44 37S.U0 35.00 35.00 35.00 G E ti f% RL VOUC-tiER1 E N J It. h'-E R f _!J R 1. . im, R1A L. h t K T V ENA LilECKM it rl, 0 u 11 AMOUNT U TI L I b u f li.L- i3j.5 I Oe; JTIL 1 6 -1-7-79.5 L r .1 L 11 I 'S 16 9 U T I L Il UT I L 1 -1 11.S - 17-7b JTILiTii U*f ILI i TE ',S - 18, U 119-43 U T I L 1 F 1.19 u I L I I L 75 J T 1 L I i I ii: s-Z$ 7* U*f ILI f 67 .60 J7 IL IT It S- -.:.x:170 . :. Ll'i i L 11 1 E. E-j- - 4 . 7Z,3 36 9 6 1 I L i I r 12; -4 0 5 4 Cs 10 505 6 84<U 0 -5 9 S T SvE G R L MY ION 10557 M 00 07 0 6 0 L A 6 d L 0 F M I N IN C's-.P 13 TA I i W K C Fi ' '' • A i N N 4 34, 7 Z6 00 1U 6 6 1 Ytj o ul /U6/9.J NW 1*mEk 1A 1 EQ PO4INC., r J 4 **, L I ' I I E. J T, I L I F I ;.S 15.79 U rIL IT lf:,c,:93 93 J T I L I T I F U T I L Ii 11: S 7 &1- 4 U I' I L I 'I A. C..39, i U `q** I L 1 -1* 1t: a#1 .h6 i T I L i r i i:i si 6.79 U *1'1 L I 1i:-;6.79 JT IL IT AT E S 69.80 LIT I L 11 1f -S.7.06 J T I L I F It.' '6.7 UT I L 14 It.64.24 U T I L vr i iz-s Z6 . 1 2 U*FJLFf IL;409.4U UTILI'VILS 30 .::.;3 U I I L 1'1' If: 1U 5F'190400 0-1 /016/90 I7 I NA L1rt RL L-IJ 43a.% 00 43;3 . 00 I U560 I 0L:r. IC, P L. U V E A 1.) E i J CT I u i\i P A A 8 L E P AC.,"A I U t-1 0 107!06 9U A F C. L CL 'A'" j 1, e, C E.1 u 0 y Iy / I U564.07 U 6 F I f A 1 L. Ph y 1. L 8 403 .64 INCOME 21 . Oa 0" VOUC:HREG 07'/ 101/90 13:45 VOUCHER/ CHECK VF.NDQk NUMBER NUMOER 10564 560100 10565 54 10566 541400 10567 531650 10568 84 00 10569 081.150 1 0570 061000 10571 831500 10572 541400 10573 541400 10574 541400 10575 280070 10576 500250 10577 91V500 10578 910500 10579 260400 10580 30d-`900 10581 661750 CHI. C:K VA TE 07/06/90 07`/09/90 07/09/90 07/09/90 07 / U9 / 90 07/09/90 07/09/90 07 /09/90 OT/10/90 07/10/90 07/10/90 07/10 07/10/90 07/10/90 07/10/90 07/10/9!) 07/1:/90 07/ 11/90 Vtilk hE• / +:. HECK RE* -* I TEt: FOR PER100 07 VkN wriME MN ,TAT 'E COMM I SS I ON. -E R MINN. STA4E: THEA.;t.JRL --R MINN. c,'rATE fREASURCR NFI RO, WA3 E: CONI ROL COMM ISSN S EF 1= EN , SCOTT KOHL, JOHN BA N.I CK , JOHN SPL(I.IALTY RADI MINN. S rATE f REASURER MINN. STA I E: TREASURER MINN. SrAT'E Tt EA ,UFU R FOREST LAKE: CONIRA.CTING9 INC M. W. G.A. VASKO RUi:t-'TSH REMOVAL VASKU RUBBISH REMOVAL FA0S`1•, DAN:tE.1. NORTNEkN STAI E'S R }_tkE -.R 1) C IP f IClN FICA CiN KI BU'I* ION'S FAI'E INC%)ME I'AX PAYABLE S "1 A1'E: D, RI Vr: ; t.1 C F•E;E' S r -' AYA k. M0'1*0R V:EH L.IC F' Ek-S PA YAB'L SEWAGE kE.Ai'VE N'i PkOGRAM EUJ= 'fI.I E Pf: GiRAM SUPPLIES FLU:: FOR ":*,f: k V I CE Mf:i ri iR VE:H L. I C, PA Y,48-LE M i. T(iR VEH I. ICC F f -JS PA YA[-'(_E: TATS ;)r1IVr:R ;a L t: CS AY 0' LE AWARDED CON` I NUC1 10N COP,4TRACI S FRAVEL Y rRAINING FOR E k VV C L', E: FEES V SERVICE Vi. C:LE AI.L.OWANCt. Q i•kAC•T PYM Ul IL IT ILS 16ci T I L I Tl ES 5 U'rILI 7 1F5 1.944 UP "IL 1 r 1 E t L1 T I L I t 1 (: ; 4" 5't U1 IL . 741 UrIL. 103ti UTIL 1080 UrIL 14 UTI.L. :...::.-. L r!L 1 -'- U 1' I. L Li rlL. JT lL. ,'::' 4U . 11 E. 1 AMOUNT 403 .64. 9 11,19 6 . f 3 9;:.4 .00 1 ::.,'061 .01 1: ;:,.91 1..2 r, 5 » Una j5.G0 x,00 114.00 4.95 1 T 107-5. O 5 t31r.cit 66. 00 Z49.64 172.78 94.7 ice:. 10 1 , 109.31 GF5.46 61.x-7 9.04 4") 0 r 181 .94 41 16.11 PAGE; 4 0 0 CHECK AMOUNT 39 4ZS.;31 9 94 - 4.00 12,961.01 13:x, 911 .23 35. 35.00 35.00 114.00 4.95 17 81T.50 10 537 .90 65.00 x;49.64 172.73 4.72 155.82 455.84 ij ;_I V 6 J F 13 R P L k 1 Cl D c. 14 U vv v v A rl I.:. t I 1- 0 A I A I %S (•:, s E M 6634 030 01 /23/90 A OLkSON, CHkISTY 6635 031400 07/Z3/90 0 u cs 04o 100 07 2.:3l5f ARIWN SHURk,VIEW Hl-*:--i--'ITAL 6637 040715 Ul/ Z 3P 0 ARK, JENNLIVER 9 0 . 8 -15 06 900 01 / ::3/,;'0 DA-i"It-AJ, TIN. 0639 0:34) 300 V 00 C d ER BLACKS PHUTOGRAPHY 6640 081155 07'/Z3/90 C. h E V L`.'N D 0 R C. Ht:V L BRACKL LOUIL::j N Ll Vi P. C: R N U ri L-'E R OA (E Nu,. 6643 1058 541400 0711 1 /9c)Ml NN IS TAt 'i f.' Tk L ATQ'Ui(t-*."-%$ 10563 5, 4 14 00 07/1'. / 90 ff, I NN --ii'[A TE 'I R E A U RR Y 18.00 18.00 61 th 1 00 600.00 010 5 0'? I 3 9 0 AC.-L-.. HARDNARL ZOU600 707o50 23.0«. 4 .co5.17 3.1--13.Zo 3 23,20 0 U Y /Z- 90 A I R P 0 Ini E R Q U I k Iv. E \i 66347 0 &ZE0 4 0 0 Ol / Z3 9 J AI R,-;-.-4,L'GNAL I J-h - e ij ;_I V 6 J F 13 R P L k 1 Cl D I Ir ly; M17.1 Y 0 R -V H Z iLJP '' L A N I Vl.:ii i. AL d P P L. I I. S LQ U I P M f. lq'i EE, J P P I.- I - j A N I J' f.l f( I A L 11AINTENAN-Cf.* MAICRIAI. UP P L lyl A I N 'I C. P% A N 1: 14 A *1 E R A 1. OUTlDL kLNIAL EQU1P14F*NT i'A' C. P A I f 4 !-.-i & I I i f * N C, / Q I P M.E. N T fRAVEL fRAINING C RED II Ffi DUP PYm. F L E! - k;VU R % V I LE H I L L SUPPL.iLS- VLhiCLL SMALL roois L. I E E. t,.t U i P 01 E 1',,i T 0 TH E R C U N .4 r R U G N C. 0%':j- T P R )G k A h Kk. L R A T I U N F E FLLS F'Ok f R V I C, L ii i \,'r E R L. tl Q N 1 N V[`-.`6 I'M LN T FELS.# F' OR SERV I CE FEES FOk %-'-,# f. k V I C; TLE L E 'HON WAINCENAWL`-' IflAfEiiIAL. PAGE b I 11:110, c. 14 U vv v v A rl I.:. t I 1- 0 A I A I %S (•:, s E M 6634 030 01 /23/90 A OLkSON, CHkISTY 6635 031400 07/Z3/90 APWA 04o 100 072.:3l5f ARIWN SHURk,VIEW Hl-*:--i--'ITAL 6637 040715 Ul/ Z 3P 0 ARK, JENNLIVER 9 0 . 8 -15 06 900 01 / ::3/,;'0 DA-i"It-AJ, TIN. 0639 0:34) 300 07 L3. / 90 BLACKS PHUTOGRAPHY 6640 081155 07'/Z3/90 8ULLEa 6641 O.9U5OO 07/23/90 BRACKL LOUIL::j 664Z 0 9 1 c+ 4 3 X17 / `3 9 0 O"WWN, 6.UiU.jl*Z-k;-' J I 6643 6914t5U 16,44 UROWNING•1:1'.'RRIS IND. 664 U E L L Jlk A R 6k.45 Y I Ir ly; M17.1 Y 0 R -V H Z iLJP '' L A N I Vl.:ii i. AL d P P L. I I. S LQ U I P M f. lq'i EE, J P P I.- I - j A N I J' f.l f( I A L 11AINTENAN-Cf.* MAICRIAI. UP P L lyl A I N 'I C. P% A N 1: 14 A *1 E R A 1. OUTlDL kLNIAL EQU1P14F*NT i'A' C. P A I f 4 !-.-i & I I i f * N C, / Q I P M.E. N T fRAVEL fRAINING C RED II Ffi DUP PYm. F L E! - k;VU R % V I LE H I L L SUPPL.iLS- VLhiCLL SMALL roois L. I E E. t,.t U i P 01 E 1',,i T 0 TH E R C U N .4 r R U G N C. 0%':j- T P R )G k A h Kk. L R A T I U N F E FLLS F'Ok f R V I C, L ii i \,'r E R L. tl Q N 1 N V[`-.`6 I'M LN T FELS.# F' OR SERV I CE FEES FOk %-'-,# f. k V I C; TLE L E 'HON WAINCENAWL`-' IflAfEiiIAL. PAGE b I 11:110,C. H E C. I. A hfJ U N. I A MUUNT 610.50 17S412-46 9 15.4Z 6.64 46.31 9 0 . 8 -15 61 .14 106.OU 708.00 19.60 19.50 4115.50 45.50 Zt.k. 52 Zlti .5Z 436. .:.0 43,6. Oz. 0 -24 10.00 99.66 16,44 0 14,90 31$. 109,05 18.00 18.00 61 th 1 00 600.00 ZOU600 707o50 23.0«. 4 .co5.17 3.1--13.Zo 3 23,20 VOUCHREG c I y OF IvIlAf L k. 140".1 fo PA6E 6 07/1%' / 9 0 13:45 k :, ' - - R FOR PERIOD 07 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHE-:K VENDOR Il r.11 I TE M CHECK NUMBER NUMBER OA TE NhME j) E , fj I F , I 'I N h0tjNT AMOUNT 6646 130550 07/Z3/90 CHEMLAWN INC .F L'F.*,%.*-j F S L R V I G1.50 DUPLICAI'C PAYMENT 8 7 . 5 f,) REPAIR MA1NT/j?,j.j)( (3f%"rL1N0,:,%6, 0 28*1 .50 64.47 131100 07/Z3/90 CHIPPEWA SPRIN(.iS ER"%#'LC-E 1.1 .78 1Z1 .7S 6648 140115 07/23/90 CLARK DOROIHY PRLI,''RAM RkG1%-J'TRA'f10jNi 20.00 6649 5, 1 (10 0 7 /1" 3/90 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQU IPM1"Nt'EDEQUIPMEN*r PURCHA`- .-.A.37 1.*:*'. 14 U I P . P U iA A S L i 0 0 0 6650 161100 07 .3/90 CRAGUN'S CONFEf%"'ENCE CCN,`ER TRAVEL & TRAINING I IT ..00 117.00 6651 1701 So 0-1/CURTIS 1000 S Ll Pf't. I E S -- 0 f-'F I C 1:.65.74 SUPP.L. FIFF ICE 75.(. SUPPL I F 1 0 415.74 665Z 170350 07/423i90 CUSOMAN NOTUR COMPANY rNC..SUPPLIES-VEHI 'LE 14* 10 14.10 6653 180,9 07/23/90 DALEY PPAT FkUS FOR SLRVIC 166..1)0 1 6654 1901 07 /t 3 /9 0 1) E M -W* U 0i) C, K 50.4i- 8t -'10 S 1,65-42.77 6655 Z30 .Z5 07/Z3/90 E.K.QUEHL J P P L I ;i S - (-.I 1: 1 C E 31 35.80 6656 Z31650 0 /14:3/90 EGGHLA S0f-1•WAR(-.S U f-'Pt. I L- -• 1: Q Ll I P M L 116.00 11.5100 6657 C-1 31.f00 0 7' IZ3 19 K 8- k. AD P AfR f) E E i U R A N'C E ts 4 :: . 5.00 INSURANCL 4 9 6658 x0 OTIZ31'90 ING rHE CIFF ICE E QU I PM. N f G FV I C E 980.'0 E Q U I P M LN f- I- I C 6 '1 -3 0 0 F r CE 7 860.Z0 6659 2 0 7 Z '13 9 0 FACILITY r%-j.YQ"'T*EMS INC.C Q ki I ti 1z' N 1 01 =1= 1 C 1z"6`402 . 7 3 SJPPL I U-S- OVF ICE 1417 . 14 EQUIPMENT F-1 -- CE 0 10 6660 Z702.50 0 7 Imo:/9u FL E E I' T' EC h SERVICE C'--.1Rp.RE-.fjkJR MAj,,%jj'/V 40 .4 1 REPAIR cx MA1;4T/V(.i+'4:.C-1.L 149 .7 0 REPAIR -8-,183.63 473,19 6661 270300 07/Z3/90 PIPi.- TWA.MAINTLNANC-U. MA-i"11RIAL.-l'i 1 9 171.28 6662 290050 07/Z3/90 F.4ANk-','S NUR 'S,.-.RY (.-RAj:Tf,3'L5.59,96 S Lj til I r r E L. L. A N U Ci 040 3 2119,96 666.3 290600 O't / 23/9fa FUN S E V.1 E fj J T "3 11) L rd N AI QLI I P Ir 1. 1\4 z 54 (1 1 , :2 RON 1) P ),, G' E 1 I k*--' It's C h E C: K AM 6 tj N r AMOUNT 1. 9 C)b 7 s 276.05 V LA d i I'Lal --S I. E. it 1 U00.00 9.;,19 I ID R f 10 1) v 0 "Li L 1i E R 14 .50 16.ou 30 'Poo C. H L*-K V 1. N D 171 R c F. L f"J I f t. 11 N d IYi f-,'L R N D M (-A ---'R OA L Pi it cI E C i-k i F 101 N 6664 10 6 0 0 Z 3/ 9 0 G L i% AL) US Q N L L. U Ile, t A k U 1-" L I E. Ll I P M L.1%4 -I 6665 3 1 U650 0 7 9 0 0 11 Ph E R 1) 1 'S P V A L F E 1- C1 R '7'j E- R V I C E 6666 3 Z 0U Dr / /Y0 G R A L D Ll A 1\1 V L i' FUR E n 4 1 C L 6 to 7 3 3 0 0:6 0 Q 2. 3 0 r-k A A S I I. A Vil W A'Y N E P A Y R LD'L L I b. OU l I tit)12.50 1 INI E R I (i iV I N V is ZSP f M 1 7 6 6 u 0 A N D Y i I I'C H WL1.;)1Nk`3 A '.3 6 9 40'Y0 0 1 H L N D k C K h L L L N i A Irs fi L N I- :t: PRO G R A M 8 tz c) i. r ii wr 11) N FE-1c'. S 66.70 40UbOO OY /Z3/9U J.L. SHILLY CID.MAIAlk-NANCL 66-7( 1 U0 t IQ 3 19 0 J P 1-J) hE I N C L) S I PA Y it E. LE TirEr 1: 'S fj;\; I N V 6672 4()U9"`5 0 '1' / oc. fil so 0 J A P E R 1) U L.L" R' S i A M R E 6 1 '3T R A 1* L U N FE 6673 401 lot)06" / '3/9U J El PR I N I F F I 667 4 4:: U;:;UU u f/ : .. +J 9 U e, L " k S h A f h L L r Rf M J PL. I L P ROD G R A Ir U r'l - I E PRU6RAM S IJ P P L I ES 6 C. 75 4,--# U i Q 5 0 L L i,.,' A N I N A1JNII's L U 1 J. N Ci A A L L TO 0 1. 6 % 76 45 b5o 0 U 7 / i-`3 / 9 0 LAND'G---#CAPL AL TERNA I tiL LAND 1111"1rOVEMENT 6677 4 d4a 0 6 4 ' 8 W / Z - 3 / 9 0 L E (i R A N H 0 1 1 N ('e-DLi* PAYALALL 6678 470 f OU 3/9Q L L L L I E W3 AN i W A ;-a f' i J L-A. I S I N b 6679 470E;05 07 /Z3/91%)L I N D iL 0 IN y R A N D A L. L VLjj1(,LL At-LOWANCA. 66: ti 501 900 OT 3 0 MANPOWER TEMPIO'RARY SERVICE EES VOR 6661 6 11 07 /2.3/90 MA,:;,1S CI.JF(r*-'R L. F' A I f( M A 1 N 7 L. u 1 11 k.. j\j -i 6G 07/;L3/90 M4 0 M I c" K c.- U L L., C. N p R L R M k 1z' 6 1 --'#' I 's'i AT 10 N S 6683 52066 07 :.Z3 /9U MCGUIRL M1C.--1A[.-L V!_ -H1(.'-LL ALLA114ANGL 6684 ts 3 1 --j0 0'( *ER L T P R 1 2.:L I L'S - V I LL 6685 5 4 07 i 42.1 .3 M•J :) 4 A If. tt L S L k V -1 C F FLL.''S F'Ok 66%,6 6 4 I90 MA G- L I CH. 9 RE f Ch L. N T L E v N E P ),, G' E 1 I k*--' It's C h E C: K AM 6 tj N r AMOUNT 4 24.76 7 6 7 s 276.05 3 3 99.50 3 , :;99.50 1 U00.00 9.;,19 I zo.Ou 14 .50 16.ou 30 'Poo I 5.00 i9y.10 199.10 4.ou 13 .'4 20,91 u 65 500 00 50u.00 Z: 9 21 9 0 I b. OU l I tit)12.50 3boloo W1.00 A0.A0. 0 0 9100 VOUCHREG C. 1 0 F In ik I -, t. 1. W 0 0 PAGE 87 / 1 / 9 0 13. 4 5 1. F PE ;1 07 VOUCHER/ C; H L'-- K VENDOR CK CK N VENDOR T F It C. H C---- C. KNUMBERNIJMEIERJAI` E NAME J) ES4 C. f- 1 ON M 0 U N T AMOUNT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 3 ; ;.67 48.67 64 .87 540395 07/Z3/90 MIKE RYGH HOMES, INC,D I.- Q'3 1 S 'P A Y A B L. E 1 5004.).00 1 6688 540550 07 /x: 3/90 M-1 t. LLR 9 SHERRAL'Vl;i-j'lC-LE ALLOWANCI:31 .96 37.96 668.9 540 . ;375 07 1190 KINN. DEPI'.OF PUBLIC '-;AFEVY OLJ'r:.,IDE RENfAL 150.00 o J r s i i) i. R E-N TA L - E. Q I P M Nl'450.04 600.00 66 90 15 5 0 0 0 0 7 -3/90 MN CHIEFS OF POLiCE A!7j',-:iO(,4q 11='T ij., 1 s F ex t! L"c- R 'i't I S 1 • 6691 570090 0 423 / 9 0 MOGRLN BROS*M;tINTENAN(dl.. MATV-*RIAL 00 MA 1. NTIF NANCE. MA rF:ri I AL 46.75 68.75 669,02,610780 07/23/90 MURRAY JO.SEPH T R Al t0 ti V 1::fis 10.00 10.00 6693 6 3 0 0 41- 5 07 2. 9 0 N.C.C.E.M.7-5.00 75.00 6694 630645 NA1101NIAL BUSINESS. WOI'P.I:i4 IRAVLL TR'AlNlN(-.i 59.00 59.00 6695.63 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES 05-4.40 64.40 6696 630910 07/23/90 NATIONWIDE ADVERT ISIN(i S ER V P Ll I S H 1 N 6 1 0 13-E. 30 6697 630945 OT/Z3/90 NCR caliER CONV'RUC COSflsij 698.00 FEEZ3 FOR 11-:Jf.kvl(lL 914.04 6698 640ZO0 07 . /ZV90 N E Af.A B 1. t S tJt'r' :; 0 1- F' I C; E 9.64 9 .64 6699 6601:75 07/23/90 NO. E; T PAUL -MAPLLW0CJi) RO"'ARY SUi:"JCRIP I IONL & 11 t. 11 tilt Lk ;;140.00 100.00 6700 661950 07/4:3/'90 NORTHSFAR TURF INC.MALL 'rocii-s 195. Q u 195.00 6701 680600 07/Z3/90 OCIOPUS CAR WASH 6 .,9 Z RE j.R MAIN1*/VL-.'-',I?.'.A-!:-.i 2 4 - 5 6'4 R EPA I R' Zxo MAIN'! i V Lrik C.L. L 69 0 RE A I R K MA I tj V C- i., i C-L Cz 13.64 R E P A Iii M 1% 1 N ;/ V [.'it- 11 c L L 6.9 REPAIR MA INN V 'E. i -S I CL E 20 0. 1 . 6 R t-.*. P A I i : >: MA I NT Vw'-i L 9 4f-I I Z 6702 691500 07 / Z: / 9 0 OWLNS SSERVICE CA 16 E M I C A LS 16 68.16 6703 700460 0-t/Z3/90 P.C. EXPRESS/f".C. TRCINICS U i'f t. I E Of- I -'I lw-k 4. 00 5100 6704 700665 07 J I90 PA EC. H 14 N I A t:+ ;i i . t h • olR A I. Q N F* S 12.50 6705 710::00 011Z3/90 PEI ::Uf.1c :C'f I tiN P i f A ly: U f i i.-415 6 T ) 645 7 C f E TE \.i U P., 0 E L C. f) VN f.' J N A C Y P f M 4 5 4 lo C. ON T R A PY.,3 45 4 0 rAGE 9 u 1 9 (a L, 4-b V d..1 L h L k L w A' -::'p r E F 0 R i ' (.*. R j. iJ D () i L. H E K V E. i\4 D fD C. Fit: K V 1: 1 N.J It, i: N U M i:. C R j) it E twit ME 0 7 / '.3/9 P I TO G f. j 7 11 t b P y 67 .09 Y 1 1 1 o 0 7 3 0 P L A Q, J E S P1. U INC. . a71 a Z 3 9 PRLr ISILIN L..Ai\ii)-'(,APL701 / 4. w .-j 6711 740900 0-1 /"...3/90 RADIO SHAL• 67 741 1 u7 /::;a /90 R A 1 N ouw F 00 b s 6713 74i5 $5 0 7' u- -- U RAP",-I-AEY t.-IJ)UNTY VAC'-. 71464 141 i-b 04 RA 1. Y 6 u f-4 1 6-115 7 4 :1.9 0 07 /x. 900 R A Y D A V I S N 71-50 07 /62.3/90 REl'l'F'RRlChkJ-(D 0717 76; 1 300 u7 ::j/RU A D WSJ N N k. 6718 70 1 UO 07 Z J 0 G&J LUCK :-."#kVE 9 7 8 0 0 c)0*! /Z3/90 Se. '4 Ii-1. 1%E PiO.) 4-')dL'T live.: . 67ZO 16 0 0 0 07/Z.V90 SAINTS NURlh 6721 60OU75 07/2.3/90 S L Ak S 67ZS 800 bo 9 1 4 1) k 'A c: i PROGRAM. SUrPi-li't. PPL I ES: - OF--i CE 1 1 14 1. AN A L F E E i ti V I C L* Ll i I L V I P G k A Iq U P I I-. i - A. 0 G k A vl S u I L. kClr.`) R A M il P P L. I P R 0 G RA Ir, S Ur i i.. I FS P R L-I (j 1 '%',A M &-:j dt P P1. 1 E I.-So il R 0 G:i A M S tj f- I P L I 1PRAh F'R 06 R ii M P P L j. P roj G R A IVI allt' P t. I I'RrVEL .'c fiiAINING S U P PL I E U I P M'L N D i. iL i I i A k. 1. L 11% k (k N i N v t I r1l' c. N i Fi:: F k f. f V 1 LE P R 6 R A lvi '21 il P P L I E-2; S U j ' r .'s J _ I I. . -. I I . I JAN lTiJk I AL A/. N t. 1. L. L, N i a 14 U A ; -4 C. f. f) i tt rl 1 6 1 %J 1 R I U N F L H E C K h m 6 tj T AMOUNT 4 3 1U . ?•5 6 7 d 64.4U 64.40 40 0 U 4U 01)0Q l.7.95 7.96 IL IL G0.1 10.72- 7.54 14.09 9 1 4 4.30 184.54 lill IV) 0u 25 .00 44. U5 44.05 1 oclo . uu 99 Z4 0 Z4 .2U i .44,1 S. 40 17000 17,00 11 .4Z 31.77 9 5u V 0 U CH OR L`G CHECK WIAOUNI'AMOUNT 01- - 11 L1. w 0 0 ij 07 90 13: 45 14,74 12. 1 . 10 660. 34 54.46 FOR P1. r (I fj 07 VOUCHER/ 14 .95 18.37 C h E ` _ K VUNDOk CHi: (,K V E. N D R I T F.-' m N UM 3ER N Ull 01;':R OA TL NAM i - I sp U 1. 1) N 6724 800385 07 /Z.3/90 SLRVICEMABJER FLES FOR "Ef(Vl(.,( 6745 800400 07/Z*,3/90 SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWARE.SUPPL. I klS NT 6 8 160.0 07/Z3/90 SPS Off ICE. PRODUCTS 15.00 15.0U 8,35 17.00 Si"S 01-171CC PRIUDUCIS 41.62. 39,09 106 .06 S UPP L .1 C'S - OFf, IC' 3 31.17 x;.0. 4 4, S OPP L I 1.' , -(0.1. 1 C k' ZOT,03 31 J F, Fl L. I E.:*D' - (.1. " F IC E b JPP L I L!L - Ul- F i C. L 246.25 1 00 10-600 U P P L 'I LEE F F" IC., L. S dPP L I L." S -01'V I C U S UPP L. I CS OF F I 'E 67-22-7 540300 07/4.3/90 ST P U L E; 0 C-1 K TA f I Q N o LJ ::P L I L-. J A N I "1 0 R ALA L U 6728 84Z?-UO 07/Z3/90 STAPLES, PAULINE,VEHICLE ALLOWANCE VEHICLE At. 1. l)W A'N G E 6729 843400 07/z3/go sr ILL, VERNUN T.f- -.' M S -."n C L. 0 T I INN 67,30 84-3535 Z07/43/90 STRAIEGIC.RESOURCUS EQUll_-%ENJ* OFFICE 6731 850695 o• / 2; 190 svLND'c'JEN PAT Rl Cl A P f 6 f t A fr. R E. Iti. 1 '.:1- f R A 1 .11-) N f f-J.- %ce 6732 651575 U7/%_-.2/90 S'Y'Zilf EMS SUPPLY, INC.S: UP P L I ICE 120 - f) F F I " E S UPP L I ES - Or- FICE U P P L. I E -S - U F F I C C Z) U P P L I ES - 0 f: Ul C. E. 6 860()80 07/ -'3 9U T.A. Schl FSK.'y INC 011 A I N T t-1 A TL-. R I A L 6734 860100 07/23/90 T . J AU I 0 P A [-(T S Uf " fp t. I E 6 -- V E H I C t. F 6,735 860315 07/2V90 1'. K. 1). A 0LJf'l ENC)INEERING ll-•i'.E*k.s 0drsiDL.. 673.6 3600500 0 7 Z ;3/ 9 0 TAR6iEt Pi-06RAM OTHER CONSTRUC.110N PR06RAM ij'P P L I E 67:7 8 6 0 6.5.1 0 07/x.34 ;O TA lf"t'O E T 1 13IR R Fl 0 A M 1U .P f L. I I . S Ur' U- S UPOPI, I US J ANi.f)fi I AL. 67 S 6Z f.-i-,68 +7/t:, T I E R N Y L I N D A PAGE 10 I 11: It CHECK WIAOUNI'AMOUNT 11.0.00 110.00 14.74 14,74 12. 1 . 10 660. 34 54.46 109138 14 .95 18.37 9.'!8 42.84 15.57 120.Z-) 3.19 17•93 19.65 40.77 5.98 51 57.20 f-lu . 19 160.19 76--3 . 00 5 .05 9 15.00 15.0U 8,35 17.00 41.62. 39,09 106 .06 3 w OZ 3 31.17 x;.0. 4 4, 1 ZOT,03 iR 246.25 1 00 10-600 VOUCHR C. 1 1 Y 0 11 A i" t. t. 1% 0 -,1 f 0 1 •i.• I 4 5 VOUCHER/ C,HECK VENDOR C Ilk. CK N VE )l D CIR NUMUE-R NlJ M B'E- R 0 It T E Wi E R I P I* Al (k N 673.9 87IZ50 OliZ3/90 TOTAL TOOL MAIN*iENANCE. MA"ll.'XiAk. 6T40 880750 OT /Z3/90 TROY L- -'HEMICAL INOLJST, 6741 88()800 07 /Z3/90 TRUCK UT I L 14 1 E -.3 MF G •J r V 1. 1 V ii. r 11 I. L. 6742 890600 071Z:3 lvO U.H.L. INC.SllJPPL I LS- J A N 11TAR I AL 6143 900100 01 / Z: 3 /90 UN I F ORM UNI.- 1 M I TE. b U N.*Z F0 R il C 1. i. 1 j-4 6 ij- 6744 9U0600 07/z3/9U UNIVERSAL MEDICAL 5 E. 14 U 1 P Pr. i. N 6T45 900T50 07/43/90 UNIVERSIfY OF hlNNlZ§-l':*Pf-J1*A 1*1'*%AVEL I-RAINING 6746 9102-00 0 VAL-.-j BURY SHOP RLrAIR S. Ilt'i.INT1 VI.. I :'t. E: 6747 910500 07/*&-3/9U 4ASpKO RUBVISH REMOVAL VA!"38K O RUCB-ISH 6748 911500 0 VIKIN(ii IN,.DUl'-',';`l'RIAL CEN17f.-Ii S IJ P Fp L I L S I. Q 1.1 i'- 101 t." N 6 x'4 940600 07 ::1 90 W U ER - I'R (i SS'E T H .1 il C Js PP 11- V 1.41 %'OLE 6*758 940640 07/Z3/90 WE NDOi%F DUL(WE-Q!"'5 d B. k I f 10•*14 M:. 11131 f. x 6 V401UO 07 9U WESCO UPPL lic"S E14 U I PKJiF. Nf JPPLl TOTAL I T L'It A mot) N. f 51 195 6.00 1 :3;..66 104 .46 79 - i 5 60 17 .50 47.50 366, 16 13.::.00 00 4b.00 60.19 103.55 PAGE 11 CHFCK MOUNT 1M6.65 51.95 6.00 132.86 5 0 IT.50 47.50 366,T6 132.00 45.00 Z '5 00 26-3.74 8999881,60 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 000 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT FLAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED PAYEE AMOUNT z 4 0015782 0 7 / 0 6 / S 0 JANE R O E R I N G 4 C' : 00 J J 0015783 -. _ _- - - . _07/06/9i; ._. -._. __. -. _Hi9EL - _.A.... _R r 00 5784 07/06/90 GAI BLACKSTONE i 1 , SC31, . 78 a 0015785 07/06/90 G RETCHEN MALL I CH 1 y 86. 78 00 1786 _ _0_7E06l90 SMITH 0015787 07 /06/90 DA J JAHN 947a24 001 5788 07/06/90 L. YLE SWANSON 587. 83 J CUDE 288a 001 5. 790 ANDREA J OSTER 1, 043. O 21 0015791 W_.I LL I AM M I K I SKA 180. oo 579.2 7/06/S D A M I - L - -- FAUSTT .48.. 1.71 00 15753 07/06/90 THE RESE CA RLSON 837. 18 00 15754 07/06/90 ALANA K MATHEYS 1 162.8 5 T, C)O 15 07 / 06 / 90 DELL] RES_ A V L GiVAL,Q 1 I 131. 50- 0015796 07/06 /90 LOI S DAVIS 1, 00 15757 07/06/90 CA ROLE J ANDERSON 1 64, 0 CC 15758 07/06 /90 LO I S N BEHM 1, 141n98 0015799 07/06/90 LUC I LLE E AUREL I US 1, 583. 37 00 5800 07/06 /90 BETTY D SELVOG 238,00 C)0 15801 07/06/90 JEANNE L SCHADT - - -_ _ _._ - -1, 073. 90 00 1580E 07/06/90 CONN I E L KELSEY 604a56 001 5803 07/06/90 LO R RA I NE S V I E TO R — --1,014a 70 CyCy 15804 07/06/90 PATRICIA A HENSLEY_59 0015805 07/06/90 CAROL JAGOE 857. Std 00 5806 07/06/90 JEANETTE E CA RL E 1 0.27. SS 0 - 0 - 1 - 5 - 8 , 07 -,07 / 06/9 . 0 -1 SANDRA OLSO1 - - -- -. - _ .. - -- - - -- - _ - - - _660, 89 J~00 15808 07/06/MARY KAY AAL.ANK 75. 76 CITY OF MAP'LEWOOD .0002 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PLAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED PAYEE. AMOUNT 4 00 15809 07/06/90 KENNETH V COLLINS 2 00 15810 07 r Q6 r 90 CA ROLE L R I CH IE _ _ ^ -_ ....- __.._- ._.----- ___.._._... j 00 15811 07/06/90 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 1 384. 8th 00 15812 07/06/90 ROBERT D NELSON 11899632 1 0 __ELA_INE F _ _ __ -- -- _ . _73.a_R..57 _ 0015814 07/06/90 CAROL F MA RT I NSON 1, 027. D9 b 0015815 07/06/90 VERNON T STILL 1 480a 68 7 / : , / ! } - _ _ .DCINR.D _- WSK—ALMA. - ._ -... ___ __ -- _.1, 506a 2.8--. 00 15817 07/06/90 JOHN F RASE R 1,338.95 00 15818 07/06/90 RAYMOND J MO RELL I 1, 19 L 15800 19 07 / 06 / 9D SCOTT L ST'EFFEN c `'•'1, 54 , 32 0015820 07/06/90 DAVID L ARNOLD 1 617. 48 x 0015821 07/06/90 JOHN J ELAN I CK 1,485s48 07/06/90 1 5222 63 0015823 07/06/90 ANTHONY G CAHANES 1 899. 3` j 0015824 07/06/90 DALE K CLAUSON 1 506s 28 15825 07/06/90 RICHARD M MOESCHTER 1 506, `8 0015826 07/06/90 JOHN H ATCH I SON 1, 00 15827 07/06/90 JAMES YOUNG REN 2 FOEL T I ER 2 0015829 07/06/90 THOMAS J S Z C Z EP'ANSK I 1 443. 47 00 0 07/06/90 CABOT V WEL CHL I N -1 4 3 m 28 0015831 07/06/90 RICHARD J LANG 1 5 36. 28 00 15832 07/06/90 DALE RA Z SKA Z OFF 1, 581.49 0 15833 07/06/90 MICHAEL RYAN - _1,.63`. 43 cM 015834 07/06/90 MICHAEL J HERBERT 1 00 15835 07/06/90 RICHARD C D REGE R 1,1657n34 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS 0015836 - 07/06/90 _ GREGORY L STAFNE 1, 506. 28 o 0 07/06/90 RONALDALD D BECKER i 3 e 0015838 07 /06/90 KEVIN R HAL..WEG 063,831 a 0015839 07106/9E DERRELL T STOCKTON 1, 480. 68 0015840 07 /0_/ /Shy _.F AU CAUL 6Y JR. t 6 0,w 0,4.._ - .. M 00 15841 07 /06/90 RICK A BOWMAN 1, 1 00 1584 07/06/9 0 FLINT D KAR I S I 498.28 iT i t 0015843 07/06/90 STEPHEN JH r 0015844 07 /06/90 DAVID M GRAF 1 646. 99 015845 07/06/90 DAVID J THOMALLA 1, 740 w 40 23 0015846 07/06/90 VOID 0015995 _ _ __- - - -- - - - -- - 07 / 06 / S0 TVEI_'AL..i±fA___.- _- _ - - - - -- - -1, 459a 88 0015847 07/06/90 ROBERT E VORWERK 1, 574. 28 00 15848 07/06/90 JOSEPH A ESE RGE RON 1 9 o' c — )O 15849 EEi- AiV . _ _ 1 706. 01 0015850 07/06/90 JON A MELANDE R 1, 574. 28 cDt_y 15851 07/06/90 SARAH SAUNDE RS 1, 0631 39 5 C)C) 1585` x.3 / 06 / 9 JASE S hr1 hE R fi S ON _ 1 618. 34 y 00 15853 07/06/ DUANE J WILLIAMS 1 421.40 j 00 15854 07/06/90 JANET L RAD I NE 1 2 34. 77 07/06/90 _ASTAHNKE__._ . 240. 67 00 15856: 07/06/90 SCOTT K DOYE R 1 1 0015857 07/06/90 CAROL NELSON — .. 1,927n97 0015858 07 / 06 / 90 1YhJTHIR- -WAL. 3T_ 1 1 061 9 00 15855 07/06/90 JOSEPH FEHR 1 1 39. D7 00 15860 07/06/90 JAYME L F'LAUGHE R I 400. 09 cyc y i 5861 07 / 06 / 90 JUDITH - WE W RTH 5.65P 51. 0015862 07/06/90 KENNETH G HAIDER 21203438 A lo` . FOR THE CCURRENT PAY PERIOD A1CCHECKNUMBER -CHECK YDATED PPAYEE A A lo` . R CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0004 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED PAYEE AMOUNT 0015863 07/06/90 JUDY M CHLEDECK 1, 1 34. 7D 0 0015864 07 /06/90 . _ . _WI PR IEF -E 1 . 0a$_ 30 0015865 07/06/90 GERALD W MEYER 1, s 0015866 V 07/06/90 MICHAEL R KANE 1 4700 90 BRYAN NA ._i 046,w 74 00 15868 07/06/90 DAVID P LUT Z 1, 0015869 07/HENRY F KLAUS I NG 1, 26On 41 0015870 07/06/90 JOHN SCHMOOCK ___ __1, 149 1 00 15871 07/06/90 RONALD J HELEY 1 , 2D4 w 3D 0 1587`07/06/90 E R I CK D OSWALD 1 163a 96 00 15873 07 / 06 / 9D STEVEN CELL I NS _480.00 0015874 07/06 / 90 RONALD L F RE DE RG 1, 00 15875 07/06/90 WILLIAM C CASS 1 775 w 7O 00 15878 07/06/90 TODD Z ACK 480 0015877 07/06/90 RANDAL L I NDSLOM 1 1 433 w 56 0 15878 07/06/90 JAMES G EL I AS 1 391 w 50 0.0 15875 07/06/90 JOHN DU CHA RME 925, 9:0 0015880 07/06/90 DENNIS L PECK 1 w 0015881 07/06/90 WILLIAM PR I EDE 1 485w 46 07/06/90 __ _ _ ________BRU - CE _ A __I I SH 1 00 15883 07/06/90 WALTER N GE I SSLE R 1 466 w `8 00 15684 07/06/90 THERESA NET Z — --1 c C0015885 07 / 06 / 90 JOHN R LOFG REIV 11036, 28 0015886 07/06/90 ROBERT D ODE GA RD 1 583. 37 0015887 07/06/90 LO I S J D RENNE R 1 175 w 86 0015888 07 / c }6 / 90 ESA RDA RA A K RUMMEL 5 i 6. 5,; 0015889 07/06/90 PAUL I NE STAPLES 1, 711 w 70 R CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0005 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 410. 50 420600 378,00 1 1.0 420xOO 420m00 460n 00 200mOO 195m00 199. 50 418s50 0015911 07/0/90 GRETCHEN ERICKSON 0015912 07/06/90 MICHELLE HILSGEN 40 0015913 07/06/90 SHE RRAL MILLER 481o50 210a 19 519,50 00 15914 07/06/90 SHANNON MILLER 00 15915 07/06/90 KARI DREGER 231oOO 0015916 07/06/90 KATHLEEN SCHALLY 15. 00 214 CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED PAYEE AMOUNT 0015901 07/06/90 DAVID WIEDL 00 15902 07/06/90 00 15890 07/06/90 LUTHER JONES 72nOO 0 0015903 07/06/90 MYLES R BURK 0 0015891 07/06/90 DANIEL L T RAVE RS 9,% 00. 0015892 07/06/90 ROBERT S ANDERSON r 1, 181.90 0015893 07/06/90 DENNIS P LINDORFF i 181.90 001 5906 07/06/90 DANIEL BURKHART 0015907 07/06/90 12 0015894 07/0/90 WILLIAM GARRY 1 148.n-.30. KIRSTEN AURELIUS 0015895 07/06/90 ROLAND B HELEY 1 001 5896 07/06/90 CRAIG CAMPBELL 423m 94 17 07/06/90 KIM BERTHIAUME 0015897 07/06/90 MARK CARLE 427. 88 0015898 07/06/90 MARK A MARUSKA 1 00 15899 07/06/90 JAMES ,SCHINDELDECKER 1 410. 50 420600 378,00 1 1.0 420xOO 420m00 460n 00 200mOO 195m00 199. 50 418s50 0015911 07/0/90 GRETCHEN ERICKSON 0015912 07/06/90 MICHELLE HILSGEN 40 0015913 07/06/90 SHE RRAL MILLER 481o50 210a 19 519,50 00 15914 07/06/90 SHANNON MILLER 00 15915 07/06/90 KARI DREGER 231oOO 0015916 07/06/90 KATHLEEN SCHALLY 15. 00 214 00 15900 07/06/90 TERRY LeCOUNT 0015901 07/06/90 DAVID WIEDL 00 15902 07/06/90 MATTHEW KIMLINGER 0 0015903 07/06/90 MYLES R BURK 0 0015904 07/06/90 LEE STOERZINGER 0015905 07/06/90 MICHAEL BILOTTA 001 5906 07/06/90 DANIEL BURKHART 0015907 07/06/90 GERALD SETTLES 00 15908 07/06/90 KIRSTEN AURELIUS 0015909 07/06/90 TODD JAGOE 0015910 07/06/90 KIM BERTHIAUME 410. 50 420600 378,00 1 1.0 420xOO 420m00 460n 00 200mOO 195m00 199. 50 418s50 0015911 07/0/90 GRETCHEN ERICKSON 0015912 07/06/90 MICHELLE HILSGEN 40 0015913 07/06/90 SHE RRAL MILLER 481o50 210a 19 519,50 00 15914 07/06/90 SHANNON MILLER 00 15915 07/06/90 KARI DREGER 231oOO 0015916 07/06/90 KATHLEEN SCHALLY 15. 00 f CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0006 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED..PAYE'E _-AMOUNT J 0015917 202,07/06/90 CA RA JO RDON J 0015918 07/06/90 KAYLENE PETERSON 444__4 _ ESQ 0 00 15919 07/06/90 AN#NETTE LEKO E05 « D0 0015920 07/06/90 - rrr.. ... _4 - _ . r._..._......._..... Y_..-_...+._... ..___•_____. r.....-....__....._ r._...._....._._._._.._..___..-..__.. JENNIFER FORD 444_4.. - 44__44 - 4_44_4___._ 215s00 it 0 0 JENNIFER S_T 00159EE 07 /08 /90 MICHAEL. GRAF 558m s 4 19.x. _0001592307/06/90 LISA HOSCHKA 00 1 07/0 DAWN CAMP ___--------___ __------ _.------ _..- _- .-- 4.444 _ -- 261. -• "5. - -._ 1 { 00 15925 07/06/90 DENA CAMPBELL 202m95 22 444__ _ .-.. r_.-.. u.._ ....__._.._.r.._...._- 00 15926 r....- _4____444.. ..._.r._.-- ..__..__... 07/06/90 r_ _...- r.. r.-.. .._. r._...-.._. r_..__.-...._-._ .._.- ._....- __- .- ..r.- .... -...- _444_4_..- .._._...._•_ -_. _.-.. _ MICHELLE SCH I M I NSKY 444_4 _.. _ -4_444 4444 17. 50 s 0159277 KA I SS DALEY _ -- -- - - -- -210a 19 0015928 .07/06/90 KIMBERLY J PODPESKA R 178u50 2a 00 15929 07/06/90 JODENE VAIN DAM 2520 K A r M R I >u - E Ni_ G l.. E A U E L.. R IV D_ - -- - - -162,50 _ 0015931,07 /06/90 KARIN HERBER 1 y 0 1 59 32 07/06/90 AARON WILLIAMS 149.8 3 l J 0015933 07/ } 6/90 CHR I STY _ANDERSO 24(). Q0 0015 934 07/06/90 RONALD L BESETH---JR.299u 00 15535 07/06/90 KEVIN JAGOE 390's 00 001 5936 r___r_JENNY 216m.56 0015937 07/06/90 JAMES I KHAML 250 w `5 00 15538 4444 _ __._. _ -. _. _ _ _ ._ - _- - -._. _ _._..________ 07/06/90 4444__ .. _ _ - -_- GERALD D I EBEL —556w00 1 15939 i_S / Sj CA R Y _ R A M lei -i.:_ {.. }A 0015940 07/06/90 AMY DORINDUSCH 259488 c1015941 07/06/90 ROY G WARD 406. 40 001594,E M 07/06/9 DOUGLAS - -- J' _ T A U E A - -- _ . _1 431 a 70 00 15943 07/06/90 JANET hit GREW HAYMAN 1, l u cy 0 15547 07/06/90 LYNE FISHER 242 a 88 0015948 KATHLEEN _h!t_ - DOHE RTY 001554' 07 /06 /90 MARIE BARTA 1 0D4. S2, 00159505550 07/06/90 GEOFFREY W OLSON 1 0015951 NAN M I GKELL.____ - - -_ 578,w.54 _ 00 15952 07/06/90 JOYCE L L I V I NGSTON 565. 94 00 5953 07/06/90 KENNETH ROBERTS 1 25ga 37 0015954 07/06/90 THOMAS R I EDESEL. -- - - _ 396a 00 0015955 07/06/90 THOMAS G EKST RAND 1 3 401. 10d L - 0015956 07/06/90 MA RJO R I E OST ROM 1 629 a 30 L C )01 5957 11311.5 i 0015958 07/06/90 ROBERT J WENGE R l 341. 10 1 Jy c - )01 5959 07/ DANIEL CAMPANA RO 528. 00 J 01 5960 07/06/90 EDWARD A NADEAU - - 1' =' =' 46 001. 961 07/06/90 GEORGE W MULWEE 1 225a 10 0015962 07/06/90 LAVERNE S NUTESON 1 600m 50 01 596 3 07/06/90 ROGER W BREHEI_M, =' ='1, . 001 5964 07/06/90 DAVID B EDSON f 236 s 33 c )01556 07/06/90 DAVID GERMA I N — .. 1 248a 8 001 5566 07/06/90 - -- -- -- — ERIC _ MART I NSON 00 0015967 0.7/06/90 DENNIS M MUL.VANEY 1 p 343. 50 001 5568 07/06/90 GEORGE C SP RE I GL 1, 1 9 5. 50 _ 00 1 5969 EL I Z ASET J WE I LAND 1 00 1 VOID 07/06/90 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ( HCMA ) 2, CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 00007 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CCURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED AMOUNTPAYEEA 3 Y 00015544 007/06/90 JJEAN NELSON!405m27 E,00 15545 007/06/90 JJUDITH A HO RSNEL L 0015946 007/06/90 AANN E HUTCH I NSON 8829003 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0008 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 001 ,33E VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 4 815. `3 001 VOID 07/06/ PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 51 S. 79 0015334 VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMS' RETIREMENT ASSOC 74,982=02 GROSS EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS 306, 876.11 46 CHECK NUMBER CHECK MATEY,}PAYEE AMOUNT 0015971 07/06/90 I CMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 9 071. 1 00 1 :'._..__- VOID- - - --7 ! - –MAPLEWOC]D._STATE 00 15973 VOID 07/06/90 MN STATE COMM OF REVENUE 9 00 15574 VOID 07/ 06/90 FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA)8, 403. 64 00 15975 VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC_ EMP _RETIREMENT ASSOC - _4, 0015576 07/06/90 CITY & COUNTY EMP C R UNION 2 5, 707. 00 00 15577 VOID 07/06/90 UNITED WAY OF ST. MAUL AREA 162a65 001 5978 VOID 07/06/90 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE 015979 VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMP. RETIREMENT ASSOC.81.00 015980 C 7 /06/90 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM"!x:95. 00 22 3 00159815981 07 / 06 / 90 AFSCME 2725 5 38 i oo 001598E 07 / 06 / 90 MN. MUTUAL LIFE INS. 19- -3988 160a 00 cfc_f 15983 07/06/90 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC 180 00 001598415984 VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 398 i 68 00 15585 VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 5, 321.36 0 6,l 9 C)6 3 8 . 0 0 00 15987 07/06/90 RAMSEY CO SUPPORT & COLLECT 400 X1015988 VOID 07/06/90 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FLANS 26o33 0 15989 VOID 07/06/90 FIRST MINNESOTA 177,v47 i 00 15990 VOID PHYS I C I ANS HEALTH PLAN 32n75 00 VOID 07 / 06 /90 FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA)8, 40 3.81 001 ,33E VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 4 815. `3 001 VOID 07/06/ PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 51 S. 79 0015334 VOID 07/06/90 PUBLIC EMS' RETIREMENT ASSOC 74,982=02 GROSS EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS 306, 876.11 46 t TO: FROM: RE: DATE: PROPOSAL City Manager Finance Director Action by Council. :i MEMORANDUM Endorse Rei acted.,„. Date PROPOSED POLICY FOR SEWER FUND CASH BALANCE July 10 1990 It is proposed that a cash balance be maintained in the Sewer Fund equal to 1096ofitsannualbudgetedexpensesplusanamountequaltothe • sewer l i f t q cost of repl ac ng astation.on . BACKGROUND Revenues usually equal expenses in the annual budgetHowever, g for the Sewer Fund.there i s not a formal policycy regard i n the cash balancege amount that 0shouldbemaintainedinthisfund. This is an important issue at this 'because $811,600 is needed timefromtheSewerFundtofinanceProjects87 -32 and90 -01. All funds should have a worki n capitalt •g p al balance large enough to avoid the needforborrowsng . Si the revenues and expenses n the •P Sewer Fund are fairlyconstanteachmonth, a working capital balance equal to 10% ofbudgetedexpenses 4 the annualbud9peswouldbesuffiBaseduponthe1990Budget, the workingcapitalshouldbe $237,000, g ng In addition to this, the Sewer fund should have a reserve to cover the .cost ofamajorcatastrophe. The largest catastrophic loss possibl 'p P 1e at this time wouldbethelossofaliftstation. The present cost to re l •570 000. p ace a lift stat on is Based upon the recedin the •P g, a minimum cash balance in the Sewer Fund should be: 237,000 — Working capital 10.000 - Reserve for catastrophes307,000 - Total Therefore, the present balance available to subsidize i •improvement projects s asfollows: 1,368,568 - Cash balance 1 -1 -90 103,430 - Transfers approved on 1 -9 -90 •PP for projects finance by 1989 Bonds 301,000 Minimum balance needed for workingg capital and catastrophes 958 - Balance available to subsidize improvement 'p ovement projects t After the $958,138 is used, an increase in sewer rates will be required to subsidize improvement projects, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that a cash balance be maintained in the Sewer Fund equal to 10% of its annual budgeted expenses plus an amount equal to the cost of replacing a sewer lift station. t-3 Action. by CouncilMEMORANDUM TO: City Manag Endors FROM:Modi'Tom Riedesel ie SUBJECT: Conditional U Rej ecteLOCATION: McKn raralt Renewal.McKnight Road and Lar enteu DateAPPLICANT: Welsh Com p r Avenue PROJECT: panles, Inc,Hillside CenterDATE: June 11 1990 INTRODUCTION The applicant is request*permit ( CUP) f . g the renewal of a conditional ( ) or Hillside Center. use BACKGROUND The City app - roved the onalcond' 'subject to t R use permit on Julheconditionslistedona Y 27, 1987pge4. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Subsection 36 -442 (e) of Citrevieweachcon y Code requires that the Citditlonalusepermitwithin Y Council approval. The City Council ma one Year of initial a time lAtime y renew the pe years, with or witholimitcannotexceedfive ut DISCUSSION The project has developed according to the original coTherehavebe P ccordi ' been no changes in Cit Code ndltions. property that would justif •y or the surroundingydenyingtherenewal. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use Permit for five years subtheoriginalconsubject toconditionsofapproval. , l Hillside.mem (Section Attachmen is 13 -29) 1• Location Map 2 • . Property Line/Zoning Ma3. Minutes p j NORTH SA /NT PAUL 8 X000 o 29 68 119 / 116pif ' i3 . _. ROLL AY AV I Zd 4 Q r: p a ou4 H/lli/ de W r/cl Z Pit - W 121 /, a Y v, : *. R AV = CLE PRIC A a ar c :fit LAR ENTEUR Ay T29N R22W, o Q 14113 $ > ID/lH0 AV 23 + 24 < Q 1) l 1) Ctmi =T R A y t2) MYRTLE CT p LH w 14 4 0 N ay p ` i'r :::: 1i • BE LANA 1 G . OAKH /L L :: ANTELOPE —NMY ANQELA t AWLrRJACK . LA %#INS f'r+ovt /e 71 S3 OEAVERDALE RD A/ /CKEY /1 jZA4QOSCALAtVY "" A%4J: Q COU*ER LA EL/hMfi4RT LA 6S E ` e/ C i 1 - i 31 ,, _ 1_o1200N. "" 31 ` ST SIR ee!Oti " f MAONOL AV q p Q o V 7 '"' O to 6oMum W 0YW 't W F- S J 960NO ESTER AV 6 7 1 a co 19 eRANO W 32 32 ° W ,, LA AV tif a MoAliwaod x ti m bii Nature SE N T Crnlrio ' E. BUSH ITV r J LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 1 F-9 Willi 12 08) M 12 (`°) C pr y WILLI1 n l i V q i t 41! •''Ai 10 w , 7 •(I! 1,336. a. AM3 BROTHERS 'j E • - ..,..._tu,t._. 1A 1 u•. R . 11 L !1# unnollo - — Ito Vs __-_Tww to - .....: 1 .`fir 0 out A ?6MIG • S h 1• q 1 , sp T 1 0C , • / 154) '' . %•••'• iii •'»:.:•964:0* rw •) M S. 110 •r. 1! » 1 7 ( • 111 Is* w lice t ,yso 61.•60O -een t. 1709 ON dof1 ' 'A 3. .• t s 3 -^• . .. , / 1' •r. 1 n z 1 S y. 1 L ti l owl c U ( .,11160. » ,'. . •, 0 / ' 101695 .3311«11. OIA _ to ' ... Po MA P L EWOOD 0 1 60) rt I . t.. -•` APARTMENTSr) I T%__7 s.-s 'ii ins ST. PAUL HI LLCREST GOLF COURSE MISSION t 2 2 51.,,) - - - - -Ong V 101 Irw V V Lie 1--AR p VRssas s ass n0arwa ease wor • 1 X b 99 o. f «, of Its ! • N 334 's 3 PROPOSED CAVE's 1 CURRIE STREET ADD'N 4 41-1) 1 BIT1 "14 a s_ _ -ft Game s--; J641N§ `11110 on or*) dw itit r ow 1 J719o4141 • MA am IC ltd PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3- Attachment 2 N 2. P.U.D. Revision: Larpenteur and McKnight Road (Hillside Center) a. Manager McGuire presented the Staff report. 3 b. Chairman Les Axdahl presented the Planning Commission report. c. Dan Parker, Co- developer of Hillside Center, spoke on behalf of the request. d. Robyn Chan, Co -owner of Hong Kong Cafe, spoke on behalf of increasing the size of her business. e. Mayor Greavu introduced the followin& resolution and moved its adoption: 88 - 11 - 196 WHEREAS CNP Hillside Partners initiated a revision to the conditional use P ermit.to include restaurants. The property is legally described as: Lot 3, Block 1, Maplewoods Estates This p ro is also known as 1690 McKnight Road, Maplewood;property WHEREAS, REAS the procedural history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1.This conditional use permit revision was reviewed by the Maplewood Planning Commission on October 3, 1988. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved 2. The p YMCity Council held a public hearing on October 24 1988. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at said hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also con- s Pideredreports and recommendations of the City Staff and Planning Commission. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above - described conditional use permit revision be approved on the basis of the following findings-of- 1. The use is in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and with the purpose and standards of this chapter. 2. The establishment or maintenance of the use would not be detri- mental to the public health, safety or general welfare. 3. The use would be located, designed, maintained and operated to be compatible with the character of that zoning district. 4. The use would not depreciate property values. 5. The use would not be hazardous, detrimental or disturbing to present and potential surrounding land uses, due to the noises, 11 /28 glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water pollution, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and .shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area properties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would -cause minimal adverse environmental- effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan and conditions approved by the Community Design Review Board. Future changes to the site plan may be approved by the board. 20 All uses shall conform with the BC(M), business commercial (modified) zoning district requirements. Restaurants shall also be allowed, provided that the City's parking requirements are met. On -sale liquor shall not be allowed. 3. External speakers shall be directed away from the dwelling units and the sound shall not exceed fifty decibels (normal conversation level) at the residential property line. 4. The maximum building height shall be one story. S. There shall be no exterior storage or sale of goods or merchandise. 6. There shall be no vents for the underground fuel tanks within 200 feet of an existing residence or the buildable area of the planned undeveloped lots in the Currie Street Addition, south of Larpenteur Avenue, 7. The type and anchoring of underground storage tanks must be approved by the City Fire Marshal. The tanks shall be strapped to a concrete slab. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 3. Televising Council k etings a. Manager McGuire pb the Staff report. b. Councilmember Ander on moved that the second meeting in January be taped y Suburban Commun t y Channels for review by the Council and staff to help determine the desiraNlity of televising future meetings. 11/28 F -I Action by Council: AGENDA REPORT To City Manager Michael McGuire VFrom: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins Subject: Application For Liquor License Date: July 17, 1990 Introduction Endorse Modifie ReJ eCtecl ., Dat e Stanley M. Smith has made application for an intoxicating liquor license for Chi -Chi's Mexican Restaurante, 3069 White Bear Avenue. Background f An investigation has been done on Mr. Smith. He has had noknown contacts with the police, and we have not found any indication that he holds a liquor license in any other establishment in the state. Recommendation After a careful background investigation on this individual, I do not find sufficient reason to deny his application for an intoxicating liquor license. Action Required Application for intoxicating 1 i quor license for City Council- review and approval or denial. KVC:js cc City Clerk Liquor File 90- 008198 1 1990JUN 14. • J4 r -, l M y M p r P.,. r ( ^1 .. CITY. OF MAPLEWOOD APPLICATION FOR I1V'I'0)iiCATING LIQUOR LICENSE T= APPLICATION SHALL DE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE. Please do not use initials. Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsify the answers to. the following questionnaire shell be deemed guilty of perjury and &hall be punished accordingly. In answering the following questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governed as follows: For a Cor- poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholders. For a part - imership one of the "APPLICANTS shall execute this application for all members of the partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED 1. T Stanley Mel Smith _ General Manager Individual owner, *!Doer or partner) . for and in behalf hereby apply for an ______ Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to be located at 3069 Whitebear Avenue, Maplewood in the City of Give address and legal description) Maplewood, County of Ramsey,. State of Minnesota, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 95 of Maplewood. 2. Give applicants' date of birth: 1 August 1953 nay) (Month) (Year) S. The residence for each of the applicants named herein for the past five years is as follows: Stanle Smith 3595 N. Gershwin P1. , Oakdale MN Great Falls, Montana Bozeman, Montana 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States ?......_y If naturalized state date and place of naturalizatio If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship including naturalization of each officer or partner. citizens w S. The person who executes this application shall give wife's or husband's full name and address......_. 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the paste, t restaurant management Z D C c s, 7. If partnership, state name and address of each partner If a corporation. date of incorporation ,00 / - = state in which incorpora Minnesota -- amount of authorized capitalization 004 amount of paid in capi ,_--- if a subsidiary of any other corporation, so sta subsidiary of Esteban's International, Inc. give purpose of corporation n w n P r-ci h i_n and n o P r a t i o n o f r e9t_a u r a n r s , name and address of all officers, directare and stockholders and the number of shares held by each: Estebans's International Inc., 2901 Metro Dr., Bloomington MN Name) (Addy u) (City) If incorporated under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this State? Number of cel-tificute of authority If this application is for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws. S. On what floor is the establishment located, or to be located? en t i r 1 d i n g 9. If operating under a zoning ordinance. how is the location of the building classified? business Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? yes 10. Is the establishment located near an academy. college, university, church, grade or high school? n ____..___. State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc 3/4 of a mile 11. State name and address of owner of building W dring Co... 99 S. Owasso, St. Paul 55127 has owner of building any connection, directly or in- directly. with applicant? no other than lease of premises 12. Are the taxes on the above property delinquent? no _ -- -- s 13. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, have ever had an application for a Liquor License rejected by any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details no 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates' in this application, during the live years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked for any violation of such laws or local ordinances; !f .so, give date and detail no 15. State whether applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during that past five years were ever convicted of I any Liquor Law violations or any crime in this state, or any other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so, give date and detail no ._., —.., i 16. Is applicant, or any of his associates in this application, a member of the governing body of the municipality in which this license is to be issued? no .. If so, in what capacity? 17. State whether any person other than applicants has any right, title or interest in the furniture, fixtures, or equipment in the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details Circle Business Credit 7808 Creekridge Circle, Ste. 210 Minneapolis, MN 55435 19. Have applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly, in any other liquor establishment in the State of Minnesota? as . Give name and address of such establishmen R 19. Furnish the names and addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer- enc .Premier Bank — Whitebear Ave., Maplewood, MN Esteban's — 4208 Park Glen Road, St. Louis Park, MN Days Inn — I694 & Whitebear Ave., Maplewood, MN 20. Do you possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner which will expire December 81st of this year? Give number of sam 6,100i._.. 21 Does applicant intend to dell intoxicating liquor to other than the consumer? no 22. State whether applicant intends . to possess, operate or permit the possession or operation of, on the licensed premises or in any room adjoining the licensed premises, any slot machine, dice,. gam- bling device and apparatus, or permit any gambling therei _ no 28. Are the premises pow occupied, or to be occupied, by the applicant entirely separate and exclusive from any other business establishment yes 24. State trade name to be use Chi —Chi's Mexican Restaurante 25. State name of person that will operate store S r a n t P v -9 m1 r h 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Number 1989 i 27. It off sale license is being applied for, do you Intend to deliver liquor by vehicle? n/a If so, state number of motor vehicle permits Issued by Liquor Control Com iasioner for current year 28. If you are building a new buildhij for the porposes for which this application is being made, please submit plans and specifications with this application. n/a 29. Financing of the construction of this bug ding will be as follows: n/a 0. Furnish a personal financial statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state- went of each partner. 81. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock- tail lounge, rite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other pertinent data) full—service r e a t a u r a r3t,.___,,,___.,_.__.. 82. What previous experience have you had in the operation of the type of business described in the answer to No. 81 above tat-al of over. 1 .4 yPa xnaripore as a rp4tauran_t and 1 ou ng a manager e 83. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have tend the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1 41%'4 X'Oo AignatuWatApplicant) i CAROL A. MILL rR NOTARY PUBLIC -- MIN;Z ^OTA HENNEPIN COUNTYtMYCommission _xpr.;, j . 1_3 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED WITH YOUR CHECK FOR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD. CONSUL, RESTAURANT CORPORAI7UN May.29, 1990 Lucille E. Aurelius City of Maplewood 1830 Ee County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Chi -Chi's Mexican Restaurante Dear Ms. Aurelius: 2901 Metro Drive, Suite 500 Bloomington, MN 55425 - 1554 612) 851 -3333 FAX: (612) 851 -3399 As we discussed previously, we are proposing to change managers on our liquor license for this establishment and I understand from speaking with you that the new manager, Mr. Stan Smith, is required to submit all new application forms. I have therefore enclosed the following: 10 City of Maplewood Application for Liquor License submitted in duplicate; 2. Affidavit of Stan Smith regarding interest in other liquor license establishments; 3. Financial Statement of St Smith; 4. Check in the amount of $5,490 to cover the liquor license fee and Sunday liquor fee. As we also discussed, our insurance carrier would prefer to issue the new insurance certificate and bond naming Stan Smith once you have approved the license and the change has been made. I could have the new certificate and bond ready as soon as this would be ready to go to the City Council for approval. If this poses any problem or inconvenience to you please let me know and I will speak with our insurance carrier about issuing these before the license is granted. I appreciate your patience and assistance in dealing with this matter, I hope I have provided you with all the information you need, if however you should require anything further please contact me and I will be happy to cooperate. sincerely, Carol A. Miller Legal Assistant The largest % ^' franchisee A w%i wM mm M WaL umk..u& w .. o i i T v r wi H, r L c W v v u Y -• CITY CLERK NO 1830 E. COUNTY RD. B. MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA 55109 RECEIVED OF DATE DESCRIPTION PERMILIC.AMOUNT FUND DIV.PROG.SOURCE 4 E T OTALJc -- c lf / CHECK CASHEt v RECEIVED BY v A F F I D A V I T I. Stanley Smith do hereby affirm that: 1. I am the full-time-General Manager of Chi- Chi's Mexican Restaurante located at 3069 Whitebear Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota; and 2. I do not possess any interest in any other liquor license establishment in the city of Maplewood. s Stanley Smith State of Minnesota) County of Hennepin) Subscribed and s worn before me this day of a, --' 1990 . Notary Public My commission expires: r" CAROL A. MILLER It NOTARY PJCLIC • %'.: ; -ZC A HENR'_P= My COMMIS-.1c;.Lio . ,ti Stan Smith Balance Sheet As of 5/29/90 S SMITH -All Accounts 5/29/90 5/29/90 Account r_ r r••_ r r r__ r r r r_ w w w r Balance r r r r_ .. • r• w r r r r• r r r• w•_ r•- ASSETS Cash and Bank Accounts Savings -Twin City Federal 2,807.40 Total Cash and Bank Accounts 2,807.40 Other Assets Automobiles -2 Cars 51400400 Misc. Household 49000.00 Other- Boat /Motor /Trailer 19900.00 Sporting Equip -Guns /Misc. Equip.3 Stocks Bonds -Dain Bosworth 70800.00 w• r•_ r• r w r Total Other Assets 22,900.00 TOTAL ASSETS r r r r•_ r_• w w 259707.40 LIABILITIES Credit Cards 400' 00J.C. Penny w r r r r -• w r r Total. Credit Cards 400.00 Other Liabilities Attorney- Panwell 2,800.00 IRS Payments 14,000.00 Loan 1- Buckley 3 500.00 Loan 2 -Smith 4 Total Other Liabilities 24,300.00 TOTAL LIABILITIES r• r r r•_ r r r r 241700.00 OVERALL TOTAL 1,007.40 Page 1 j!Q I* TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: DATE: MEMORANDUM Enddorsa f ,.,,,. ;,.. Iod.fiad City Re j ected,,,,,, -_\ .,,,,.. .y Hager DaDirectorofCommunityDevelopmentto Detachmentachment and Annexation, Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Ariel Street, Between Cope and Castle Avenues Mario Jo Cocchiarella June 8, 1990 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Mario Cocchiarella is requesting approval of the followin g items: 1. Detachment of a 1.7 -acre parcel from Maplewood and concurrent annexation of the property to North St. Paul, 2, A Comprehensive Plan amendment from BW (business warehouse to RL (residen low density) for the 1.1 acres that will iremain n Maplewood. 3. Rezoning of the 1.1 acres from M -1 (light manufacturing) g and R -2 dwelling) to R -1 (single dwelling). City staff is proposing to include the water tower site in the rezoning. Refer to the maps on pages 11 and 12 and his letter on a e 19.p g REASONS FOR THE REQUEST Mr, Cocchiarella is developing the single - family homes to the south of this property. He would like to addition1 homes in this area. There is a preliminary drawing of his planonpage13. Mr. Cocchiarella plans to sell homes on the north cul -de -sac from $80,000 to $110,000. He plans to sell homes on the south cul -de -sac from $120,000 to $ Another reason for this plan is to prevent the extension of ArielStreetnorthwardtoCastleAvenue. Mr. Cocchiarella is concernedthateastboundtrafficfromHighway36andfromthefrontageroad may use Ariel as a throughway, g g y. For this reason, his plan showsthedevelopmentoftwocul -de -sacs instead of a through street. Mr. Cocchiarella is proposing the detachment and annexation to put the lots around these cul -de -sacs in one City with a easilydefinableboundary. The development - in Y p of the cul-de-sacssacs results in a lot configuration which does not follow the existing CiYboundary. The boundary bisects several proposed lots. BACKGROUND The City Council rezoned a small piece of the Hillcrest propertypy to the west from BC, (business commercial) to R -1, (single-family residential) in 1983. Hillcrest Development sued the City. The court ordered the City, in.1985, to change the land use plan and zoning for all the Hillcrest Development land on Castle Avenue to M -1, (light manufacturing) and the land on Cope Avenue to R -2, double dwelling.) ANNEXATION AND DETACHMENT ALTERNATIVES 1. Detach both cul -de -sacs to North St. Paul. (See page 13.) Advantage: The residents would live and vote in the same city that provides them their services. Disadvantage: Maplewood would lose several lots. 2. Detach south cul -de -sac and annex the north cul -de -sac. See page 14.) Advantage: Neither city loses lots. Disadvantages: a. Some confusion to residents of the north cul -de -sac. Maplewood would plow their streets, while North St. Paul would provide the rest of their services. b. Jogging boundary line. 3. Detach the north cul -de -sac and annex the south cul-de-sac. See page 15,) Advantage: Maplewood would gain one more lot than North St, Paul. Disadvantages: a. The boundary line would divide adjacent lots on the east side of Ariel Street. b. Residents of the south cul -de -sac would be plowed by Maplewood, but receive other services from North St. Paul. C, Jogging boundary line. 2 4. Make Ariel Street a through street that curves to the west, coming out on Castle or Cope Avenues over German Street. A minor detachment to North St. Paul may be needed for Lot 6. See page 16.) Advantage: The.boundary would need only a minor adjustment. Disadvantages: a. Mr. Cocchiarella does not feel that he can market more expensive homes on Cope Avenue if Ariel Street connects them to the lower value homes on Castle Avenue. b. Mr.. Cocchiarella opposes a through street to Castle Avenue 5. Put Ariel Street through with no change in boundaries. (See page 18,) Advantages: a. No change in boundary. b. Public Safety favors a through street. Disadvantages: a. Mr. Cocchiarella will withdraw his application for rezoning to R -1. Hillcrest will market it for commercial use. b. Most of the residents oppose a through street to Castle Ave CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Concurrent Detachment and Annexation If both cities agree to the detachment and annexation, they may submit.resolutions to the Minnesota Municipal Board. The Board may then order the detachment and annexation. North St. Paul officials have shown support for this proposal. Plan Amendment and Rezoning City Code gives the following criteria for approving a rezoning: 1. The rezoning should be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance. They are to: a. Reduce traffic congestion. 3 b. Improve safety from fire and other dangers. C, Provide adequate light and open space. d. Avoid overcrowding. e. Conserve property values. 2. The rezoning should not injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of - the neighborhood. 3. There should be adequate public facilities, such as streets, sewers, water lines, schools and parks. DISCUSSION The City should support this project because it is consistent with the City Council's and residents' desire for single-family homes in this area. If the project is successful . Mr. Cocchiarella may try to develop the rema ni g commercial and R--2 zoned land with single - family :homes;. There are two issues with this proposal-- Ariel. Street and the annexation.. Ariel Street The City Council decided not to construct Ariel Street as a through street on March 27, 1989. Three members voted in favor and two against. Four votes were required for approval. Hillcrest Development requested this project. They have since applied for the vacation of Ariel Street. They have asked Staff to hold their application until the Council acts on Mr. Cocchiarella's proposal. Mr. Cocchiarella told me he would not be interested in the rezoning or I single- family development if Ariel Street is constructed as a through street. Constructing Ariel Street with cul -de -sacs would keep traffic levels down and enhance the residential neighborhood to the south. The residents in this area do not want Ariel Street constructed as a through street. Staff conducted a survey of property owners within 350 feet of Ariel Street. Of the 12 replies, seven opposed a through street, four had no opinion and one was in favor. The person in favor is Jim Pomush who owns part of the commercial land on Castle Avenue. Those opposed, objected to the increased traffic. The Public Safety Department is in favor of the through street. Chief Collins feels that the through street option allows for both greater ability for moving of traffic and access for public safety vehicles. The Fire Marshal feels that the cul -de -sacs are unacceptable. He would like to see all streets in this area put through, including Cope Avenue to White Bear Avenue. 4 Detachm and Should the City allow North St. Paul -to annex these two cul -de- sacs? There is a tendency to resist annexations to another city for emotional reasons. Staff's recommendation is based on what would cause the least confusion for the future residents. Also, residents should live ix, tie city .that provides and bills them for most of their public services, such as snow plowing,, water, sewer and electricity. They can then vote for the officials that provide those services. The City Council approved a similar annexation to North St. Paul in. 1984. This was a seven -lot single- family development on Ariel street, south of the DNR trail on Eldridge Avenue. This was a case where it was easier for North St. Paul to provide services than for Maplewood. Mr. Cocchiarella's main interest is to prevent Ariel Street from being a through street. He has only a secondary interest in the annexation. However, the two cul -de -sacs would create several problems with the cities' boundary. Lot Lines As you can see from the drawing on page 13, the City boundary cuts through the middle of several lots. The City boundary should follow lot lines or streets. All of the homes on a cul- de -sac should be in the same city to reduce confusion. Snow Removal North St. Paul is in the best position to plow the north cul -de- sac. The Minnesota Department of Transportation plows Castle Avenue. A Maplewood truck would need to make a special trip to plow the northern cul -de -sac. North St. Paul plows Ariel Street. It would be easy for them to plow the southern cul -de -sac as well. Utilities Either city could provide water to the cul -de -sacs from existing lines at Cope Avenue and Ariel Street. North St. Paul should provide water, because they have a dead -end line. Since they do not treat their water for minerals, It is more important for them to loop their lines to keep the water clean. If this line is not looped, they will have to periodically flush the line at the hydrant. Maplewood has a sanitary sewer in Cope Avenue, but it does not extend to Ariel Street.. North St. Paul has a line at this corner and should, therefore, provide service to the cul -de -sacs. 5 North St. Paul would provide the cul -de -sacs with electricity. Tax Implications The loss of tax revenue to the Maplewood is small. If the project site remained. in Maplewood, five single-family lotsgYcouldbedividedontoArielStreet. Assuming that the homes would be worth an average of a $ and would be homesteaded, Maplewood's share of.the annual property tax for these homes would be $1511 each year. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the resolution on page 21 that approves the detachment and annexation of the property.160 feet west of the Ariel Street right -of -way, between Castle and Cope Avenues. Approval is contingent on North, St. Paul agreeing to zone the property for single - family use and on the developer paying the deferred assessments. 29 Approve the resolution on page 22 that amends the comprehensive plan frog. N - (business warehouse) and RK residential medium density) to RL (residential low density). Approval is because: a. Single- family homes would create less traffic. b. The properties to the south and east are planned for single - family homes. 3. Approve the resolution on page 23 that rezones the property from M -1 ( light manufacturing) and R -2 ( double dwellings) to R -1 (single dwellings),, 0 BACKGROUND SITE DESCRIPTION Total Acreage: 5.5 ac. Arrel Street right -of -way = 0.6 ac. Acres in North St. Paul = 2.1 Acres proposed to be annexed into North St. Paul = 1.7 Acres proposed to remain in Maplewood = 1.1 Existing Land Use: undeveloped land SURROUNDING LAND USES Northerly: Castle Avenue and Highway 36 Easterly: Single dwellings and undeveloped land in North St. Paul; planned and zoned for single dwellings Southerly. Water tower, single dwellings and undeveloped land; planned for W (water to -er) and RL residential low density) and zoned for double and single dwellings Westerly: Undeveloped land; planned and zoned for commercial development PAST ACTIONS November 4, 1965: City Council approved rezoning part of the Hillcrest Development site from R-1. (single-family residential) to BC (business and commercial) to allow for construction of a small shopping complex. March 1983: City Council started action to rezone the property from BC to R -1 in conformance with the Land Use Plan. This plan designated the property for low- density residential development RL). April 26, 1983: Hillcrest Development submitted a request for a change in the Land Use Plan designation for their property from RL (residential low density) to LSC (limited service commercial). June 20, 1983: Planning Commission approved the staff recommendation to amend the Land Use Plan from RL to RM residential medium density) and BW (business warehouse), July 11, 1983: City Council took no action on the recommended Comprehensive Plan amendment, leaving the Land Use Plan designation as RL. 7 July, 1983: As a result of City Council's decision to take no action on.the recommended plan amendment, there remained a conflict between the RL Land Use Plan designation and the BC zoning. City staff thus recommended rezoning the property from BC to R -1, as initially proposed by the City Council in March of. 1983. September 12, 1983: The City Council rezoned the site from BC to R -1. September 14, 1983: Hillcrest Development filed suit seeking to overturn the City Council's downzoning of the propert y and to reinstate commercial zoning for the property. May 14, 1985.o The District Court ruled in favor of Hillcrest Development and ordered the City Council to amend the Comprehensive Plan, as recommended by the staff and Planning Commission in June 1983, and to rezone accordingly. June 17, 1985: The Planning Commission, as it had in June of 1983, recommended that the Council change the Land Use Plan from RL to RM and $W. They also recommended that the Council rezone this area from R -1 to R -2 (double dwelling) and M -1 (light manufacturing) . July 8, 1985: City Council approved the Plan amendment and rezoning as recommended by the Planning Commission. March 14, 1988: The City Council denied a conditional use permit to sell truck toppers north of the water tower. March 27, 19 8 9 : The construct Ariel Stre Cope Avenues. PLANNING 1. The proposed RL primarily for a double dwelling City Council did not approve a proposal to et as a through street between Castle and residential low density) designation is variety of single dwellings. An occasional may be allowed. 2. The present RM designation provides for such housing types as single dwellings on smaller lots, double dwellings and town houses. 3. The present BW designation includes governmental and public utility buildings and structures, storage and warehousing facilities, wholesale business and office establishments, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations, and other industrial uses of a lower- intensity nature. 8 mb /mario.mem go /memol8 . mem ( sect . 11 Attachments, 11 Location Map 2. Land Use Plan 3, Zoning Map 4. Alternative 1 5, Alternative 2 6. Alternative 3 7. Alternative 4 80 Alternative 4 9, Alternative 5 lo. Letter from Applicantppt11. .Detachment and Annexation Resolution12. Plan Am ResolutionAmendmentResolut' 13. Rezoning Resolution IrIG - PLAZA - CERV^IS ». :. AVE ~' --- - 4 ADZ) C ONaLa•_ •,. ! 1 (! V ,_ - w - , - -•= row- " t..,..„ J...- 'L - .. 6 • . .. C . r. • . " -• .J = +'a.' S•, Fit ..•r. _ " . .. to (•) W . to _ ' c, pj r' - V K I N eIGHWAY 36 36 aa.- A 1 4L ergt u.. i e , t • • I • r n r e• ) f r •• ; !V • .y •: r f Q Q ' V SHERREN• (M "`* / / /L i Ic- •• -''! Io y • lav }». O -c (7 • t • f . t , ,/ • s „ • t s • + f . , 9 : 1 i .••a• -7 :.a. Z L .. , i : v ,• r. r J• Z .. ,ter + ' 1 - •• t/• . I ••: •j Yw ,r «.- - • v_ t DOPE -.._. •-c0rE spy 1 - •, AVE o s.i++sr -r i .. O R T i KY1- N id N ( ITT t LARK H MAPLEWOOD (if • HE 3; i hf h+ M I, tai v . %' - ] L t Il t , • ! s M • n 1Y : +,..c Q s M, .`''' —!• - p•1 ' 1 2q 3 SEQONO 4•i tr Ly r , iS y -- r"' R0 to . .,, V 2 j- • r _. -_.... L LAURIE 1: ^ yt• • - _wr_ o• ^. •&V L le v 2.1- t (•.)• !•i•1 1• „' V' ) --- "rLLr'f 1. -- -. m V t Ut f frr•t.e• . _ • s - - < 'I's ,t • J . ; • : W K (w. W NORTH x:11 • »..-. a SAI DMURS7 ` ... (.r + 1 „• 4. w) •t - ,'.<; • r- =C3L . -t(n• t).. <st ftt aid • r l)1 TT_- G 1 'G Ih< ..' (H` = l•>1 CW =•)• •' W -COUN •' " v `rlROAD- _ rs 1•• .. A•) ' '.• t 2 1 - ° COUNTOADY- -'RCOUNTRCfAD_B f C t i . LOCATION MAP 10 Attachment 1 4 N 07 o` o0woo) at (is). 00 HWYn 36 runs knrrsa n CASTLE AVE Ix BW 1 Yiis • :.: : •i: iJ..•.. :V..: i ........... i N W GO t JR-W s 10 10 ' COPE AVE r 0110-10-M-0 budlolosumn C Mv os .i N oil in 0 g6 () N2819741986 r Lv o 0 4(") a 0Q4) 0 z ob ONO Oft Oft UP — ATOLD 1-14*11;iA Gomm 3j4 CO L4 L84 no so MUD ss, ow 0 Ab Cek6l - 4% Z 4 a• •fZ 15 (st) ' •. R 0LAURIE • Tj2 t 1 t Ono am 0' c 1 ! G f I c• r Z ' Y s LEGEND LAND USE PLAN BW= Business Warehouse RL= Residential Low Density Ped Detachment to RM= Residential Medium Density NOS St, Paul W= Watertower Plan Amendment: BW to RL N 11 Attachment 2 00 0 0s)c 00 Leo. .. HWY. 36 0 n CASTLE AVE aw 13 t r.•.•.•.... ti rr i N.M.NX.: f..;:.....• ,fie& J NMy i COPE AVE t# : cm.•6 s 00s * r oil r1 f Z 1968 1974 1986 N , 1 +sr S o be e , o p • .' a Q4) o T + C3 AUD ' ..t e :qv , ,,., IL4 L$ _k 1•lL Il .W ram 4E) 49 1 IMS 1 0 it 0 LAVRIE • R T1 C • ... • s y its o C • .. Sled Cr Is t•r VIA 1.33• G S si ot w w c L • J LEGEND ZONING M1 =Light Manufacturing R 1 =Sing 1 e D w e l l i n g s Proposed Detachment to RZ= Double Dwellings North St. Paul W =Water Tower Rezoning: M1 to R1 •• 12 Attachment 3 srLf coprom-MMEME w a ` e EX I STJ.a16 SSW GR+- u/{ -Tf2 F=#ZPM A,)o,cnl sT. PAPULo ALTERNATIVE 1 MEN n CITY BOUNDARY 13 Attachment 4 N colwMEMM w a e I 100 WATEA.- FoZPM NoX7H Si. ipt"L ALTERNATIVE 2 NEE M CITY Bo D- Y 14 Attachment 5 Q N r' 1 CASTL E I LI k-0 w U X13 I 1%0 a NORTH ST. PAUL i q o y i MAPLEWOOD Co PC FX i sTj ws. v FELON No.7t{ Si. Ph-L w a e 0 M 0 CITY BOUNDARY ALTERNATIVE 3 is Attachment 6 4 N HIGHWAY 36 CASTLE 5 3 3 WATER TOWER I t COPE AVENUE Q a W W H J Q Fm MAPLEWOOD O Z CITY BOUNDARY ALTERNATIVE 4 16 Attachment 7 '•- 4 N o7 off, t 00 oe 00 L so 1 .10 DO LL (rs) HWY. 3 Street connect to Castle Avenue or Cope Avenue CASTLE AV C* COPE AVE a too t r fl 1974 1986 kj 2 3 (34),0fl . 1. •. S'! 4.14. i J. op - / a) A TL O I• L4 r e e o . q w ,,,, L4 Lb 4 L t « •. f L 7t .... .W w 15 (1 t) a L AURIE 7' itsws WA • / • • . .. .. . ... .. ... . > t f rt G j. s 1 IC f t 7 v 0,.d 7i s 1f.. CITY BOUNDARY ALTERNATIVE 4 APPLICANTS SITE 17 Attachment 8 1 1 ti s 0 ' C• F r h 1.» HIGHWAY 36 CASTLE 6 o 5 3 3 o WATER TOWER I Z COPE AVENUE.Q a W Cr.N J FM MAPLEWOOD O Z ALTERNATIVE 5 t 1 CITY BOUNDARY Q N 18 Attachment 9 April 23 1990 Mr. Geoff Olson City Planner City of Maplewood 1830. East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: As per our previous discussions, I am writing to you to provide in detail, my plan for the properties legally described as Lots 23 - 30 Block 6, and Lots 1 - 8 and 27 - 30, Block 11, Dearborn Park. This yistheareainMaplewoodfrontedonthenorthb Castle Drive the Highway 36 frontage road) and by Cope Avenue on the south, more commonly known by its proximity to the water tower (see the attached Exhibit #1) As you know, I have already developed in excess of 90 residential lots south of this area, located both in North St. Paul and Maplewood. One of the obstacles encountered during this earlier development was the lack of economically feasible access to sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer. In my - version of this newest neighborhood, the City of North St. Paul would provide all services to the properties to be developed north and east of the water tower (See Exhibit #2) . The most important aspect of this proposal concerns the detachment of this property by the City of Maplewood and its subsequent annexation by the City of North St. Paul. Upon detachment, this property would be combined with other land east of the existing Ariel Street right of way for a combined plat in North St. Paul (refer to Exhibit #2) . This was done for three reasons: 1) The City of North St. Paul would like to complete its "loo "p pofservicesfromthefrontageroadeastto7thStreetin North St. Paul, since they have existing homes on the frontage road which need service. 2) Utilizing Maplewood services would be a - costly, necessarily City completed and assessed project. The economic advantages are magnified when compared to trying to use Maplewood services for these homes, 3) Once Ariel Street is vacated, there is no easily defined North -South boundary between North St. Paul and Maplewood. The detachment and annexation re-creates this line . 19 Attachment N Mr. Geoff Olson Page 2 April 23, 1990 The advantages to this proposal are I also many and. varied: 1) The property surrounding the water tower would be essentially rezoned to R -1 single family from its. present M -1zoning. This is an opportunity to get this property ack toItsoriginalzoning, issue Y g, I believe is good for the property owniers South of Come and the City of Maplewood. 2) Ariel Street would be vacated north of Cope, thus cutting offtrafficintotheresidentiallycompletedareassouthofCope. 3) A natural break for City services then occurs west of thewatertower. (eg. NSP services East of the tower;Maplewood services West of the tower.). To summarize this project requires the following ctio •Exhibit #2) g n • (Refer to 1) Detach a portion of Maplewood property east and north of thewatertowerforannexationbyNorthSt. Paul . 2) Rezone the property remaining in Maplewood as shown 'p wn inExhibit2fromM--1 to R -1. Thank you for your consideration and for the time ranted m Ken Haider g myself and my engineers b Y er and yourself. I Look forward to hearingfromyousoonregardingplanningcommissionandcouncildates Best Regards, r Mario J. Cocchiarella 20 DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council has. received a request from Mario,Cocchi.arella for the concurrent detachment and annexation of the following legally described property: SUBJ TO VAC ALLEY & AVE, SUBJ TO ESMTS; LOTS 27 THRU 30 BLK 6 & 1 THRU 4 & 27 THRU LOT 30 BLK 11 IN THE DEARBORN PARK PLAT SECTION 11- 29 -22, WHEREAS, Mr. Cocchiarella is proposing to plat this property for single - family homes; and, WHEREAS, the lot configurations for these lots do not follow the cities' boundary line; and, WHEREAS, North St. Paul will be providing the utilities, snow plowing and street maintenance for this development, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that the above described parcel be concurrent l Y detached from the City of Maplewood and annexed by the City of North St. Paul,subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the City of North St, Paul, 2. Payment of the deferred assessments. 30 The City of North St. Paul agreeing to zone the ro ert for single- family use. p p y Approved on , 1990 by the Maplewood City Council, 21 Attachment 11 PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mario Cocchiarella applied for an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan from BW, business warehousing nd RMg , residential medium density to RL, residential low density. WHEREAS, this amendment applies to the land 320 feet west of Ariel Street, between Cope Avenue and Castle Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this plan amendment is as follows: 11 The Planning Commission held a publ c hearing on June 18, 1990 to consider this plan amendment. City staff published a notice of this hearing in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding propertygppy owners as required by law. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the plan amendment be 2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on 1990. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described plan amendment for the following reasons: 1. Single- family homes would create less traffic. 2. The properties to the south and east are single - family homes. Adopted on 1990. 22 Attacment 12 REZONING RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mario Cocchiarella applied for a rezoning from M -1,light manufacturing and R -2, double dwellings to R -1 single-g g family residential. WHEREAS, this rezoning applies to the land 320 feet west of Ariel Street, between Castle Avenueand Cope Avenue. The legal description is:g SUBJ TO VAC ALLEY 7 AVE,, SUBJ TO ESMTS ; LOTS 23 THRU 30 BLK 6 & 1 THRU 8 & 27 THRU LOT 30 BLOCK 11 IN THE DEARBORN PARK PLAT, SECTION 11- 29 -22. WHEREAS, the history of this rezoning is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission reviewed this rezoning on June 18, 1990. They recommended to the City Council that the rezoning be 2. The City Council held a public hearing on 1990. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The.Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Adopted on , 1990. Attachment 1:3 23 Planning Commission -2- Minutes 6 -18 -90 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Cope Avenue and Ariel Street -- Detachment and Annexation, Plan Amendment and Rezoning Secretary Olson presented the staff report. A commissioner asked staff to explain how it is determined where City boundaries are relocated. The commissioners discussed the safety concerns and emergency vehicle access with the proposed cul -de -sacs and, also, the availability and considerations of installing utility service by either North St. Paul or Maplewood James Pomush, 7 West Golden Lake Road, Circle Pines, the owner of the property to the west of this area, said that this area has been rezoned from commercial to residential and back to commercial several times. Mr. Pomush said he thought the entire area on Castle should be zoned commercial to avoid having two incompatible areas. Commissioner Anitzberger informed the Commission that he owned four lots directly across Highway 36 from this site, but since that property is not involved in this proposal he would not be abstaining from the vote. Commissioner Gerke suggested the southern cul -de -sac be developed residential, but the northern area should be developed commercial. Mr. Gerke said the substantial traffic and noise in the northern area on Castle Avenue would not be suitable for residential development. Commissioner Rossbach said he opposes residential development along the Castle Avenue frontage road of Highway 36,.since the area is now primarily developed commercially. Commissioner Rossbach suggested annexing the northern property to North St. Paul, which could utilize North St. Paul utilities, and annex the southern property to Maplewood for R -1 zoning -- except Lots 13 and 14 which could remain M -1 zoning. Commissioner Larson suggested that since Castle Avenue will most likely be a through street developed commercially in the future, the home owners of this proposed development would become dissatisfied with the commercial area. Commissioner Larson recommended one cul -de -sac on Ariel Street with the lots backing on 24 Planning Commission Minutes 6- 18-90 3- Castle Avenue, with no connection between Ariel Street and Castle Avenue, and elimination of the northern cul- de -sac. Commissioner Larson said this proposal would place all of the lots in Maplewood and the residents would not be subjected to problems from the surrounding commercial development on Castle Avenue. Commissioner Rossbach moved that the City of Maplewood work with the City of North St. Paul to grant us annexation of all of the property necessary to create the lots as shown in the southerly cul-de -sac; that the City of Maplewood further work with the City of North St. Paul to detach and annex to them all of the property necessary for the northerly cul -de -sac. The parcel of land which would then form the southern cul- de -sac in the City of Maplewood should have a designation of RL on the land use plan, and further that this piece of property should have a zoning of R -1. Commissioner Fischer seconded The motion passed. Ayes - Si.gmundik, Gerke, Anitzberger, Larson, Fischer, Rossbach, Axdahl Nays -- Cardinal, Sinn, Barrett Commissioner Rossbach moved to take no action on Lots 13 and 14, Commissioner Gerke seconded The motion passed. Ayes- - Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Gerke, Larson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Fischer 6. NEW BUSIN S a. Lot Area riance: _)3rdrke Ave. (Svendsen & Kaiser) Ken Roberts, ociate Planner, presented the staff report. Th co i.ssioners discussed the size of the various 1 s in t is area. 25 AGENDA ITEM —,t-d AGENDA REPORT Action by Co oil :. TOO City Manager Endorse FROM City Engineer Modified„,„ Rcj eeterl. SUBJECT: Storm Sewer Assessment Reduction Date DATE: July 17, 1990 As part of the proposed land use plan amendment the developer is requesting a reduction in the storm sewer assessment due to the less intense land use. If the property as planned RL at the time y p of assessment, the assessment would have been $.09 per square foot. Since the property was RM and BW at the time of assessment, the rates were $.14 and $.18 per square foot, respectively. It is true that the proposed land use will enerate lessg runoff than the current planned. use. It should, however, be remembered that the storm drain system was designed and constructed for the larger runoff rate. In the past, assessment reductions have not been made a part of a land use change. Therefore, in keeping previous decisions p gwithpisionsanassessmentreductionisnot recommended. If the city council does decide to make a reduction the appropriate time would be when a preliminary plat is approved. KGH j C MAY 2 2 1990 May 21 1990 Mr. Ken :Balder City .Engineer City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Ken: As a follow -up to .our conversation of May 18 1990 concernin assessments on the Hillcrest property near the water tower on 11 ighway3G , I am writing to formally request a write-down of the storm sewer assessment on the parcel to be rezoned from commercial to s.ingl.e farni.ly. The enclosed statement of assessment summarizes all against this property. I have highlighted those assessments pertaininggtostormwtermanagement. My ,request simply involves reverting from an assessment o£ $ . 18 cents per square foot to $.09 cents per squarefoot: on the affected property. This reflects the actual difference between corru and residentlal property. Quite frankly, the write -down of assessments is necessary to make the project economically feasible due to the disparity in Ian(] value as a resul-t of the proposed rezoning. Ken, please call me with comments or your perspective regarding thisgg issue. I must ask, in any case, that this write -down be submitted as part of the application. for rezoning, detachment:, and lot split already-YsubmittedtoGeoffOlson. Best Regards, Mario J. Cocchiarella enclosure 41P CITY OF 16J 0 E. COUNTY ROAD r" MAPLEWOOD, MINN OlD 19 DEPARTMENT OF pUDLIC Lj.JRKq . C) NOW 5862 PROJECT NOW 85_26 COPE ()V E. HAZ[]_/ARIEL THIS IS THE ON Y STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE IT IS. IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UMDERBTAND YOUR RIGHT ^'S ' D OBLIGATIoNS CONCERNING THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE AT7ACHED NO OF ASSESSMENTH RAING~ ` '— YOUR ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATI011 NUMDER 11-2q_-22-3t-0036 IS AS FOLLOWS: T ~ OBJECT IONSTO THIS ASSESSMENT WJLt- BE ACCEPTED ASSESSMENT HEARING. ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIOH' (ORAL O" OF THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACi DY T||[ | MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THECLOE OF 1 ASS2S51il| DETACH AND RErM THIS PORTION WITH YO(JR PAYMCff D/P NO. 5862 L/NTlL THE CLOSE OF THE J WRI7ING) TO ANY PART vTY CLERK OR THE Y HEARING, 10-10--88 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT NO. 85- COPE AVE. HAZEL/AR PIN,` 11 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ***$42_',099.56 ~ TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. Encii =t4,9 17 DO EACH =92:15. 00 jj 5 D 01 EnciA =v«°$8.721.35 000 STORM SEWER (W) SF AT 0190 EACH o 00^~ 20, 9609 000 STORM SEWER (RM) SF. AT 0.140 EACH =2,934.4N~~ / 0,000 STORM. SEWER (RH) SF'AT 1[10 Encii 8°173.70=- mmm SnmI/*R' SEWER SExvI A T 425.8Q EACH =w$1,277,4N 3~000 WATER SERVICE AT G91.80 EACH =2,073.54 ' TOTALYOUR FOR THIS PARCEL IS _--42,099056 WHEN REQU E STING INFORMATION OR CORRESPONDI NB UBUUl 7 HI r,_' S ( '[ EMENT , PLEASE REFER TO PARCEL. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 11-29-22-31-0O36. T ~ OBJECT IONSTO THIS ASSESSMENT WJLt- BE ACCEPTED ASSESSMENT HEARING. ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIOH' (ORAL O" OF THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACi DY T||[ | MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THECLOE OF 1 ASS2S51il| DETACH AND RErM THIS PORTION WITH YO(JR PAYMCff D/P NO. 5862 L/NTlL THE CLOSE OF THE J WRI7ING) TO ANY PART vTY CLERK OR THE Y HEARING, 10-10--88 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT NO. 85- COPE AVE. HAZEL/AR PIN,` 11 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ***$42_',099.56 ~ TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. ilk i MEMORANDUM Action by Council.j Y To: ! Michael A. McGuire ndors ere, City Manager-From: Robert D. Ode and 'Subj :Open S g Director of Parks & RecreaMPpaceandWetlandsRecreation eoted--.--Date: June 19, 1990 Date Introduction The City Council on AprilsubjectofOe p 9. 1990, passed a motion toOpennSpacetotheParkandRecr refer the research and report back t eation Commission fortheCouncilrecommendation, n 90 days with •n. Y th their The Park and Recreation Commission at their Aprildecidedtoactasac di p 16th meetingommitteeofthewhoie'to sThecommitteemetonAr • cuss Open SpaceApril30th; May 8th with Cli P e' Ramseur /Washington Watersh f AlchingerHaiderpub ed District; and May 15thPublicWorksDirector; an Y with Ken attached report, , d June 12th to prepare tDiscussionwasalsoam p he May 21st and June major part of the18thParkandRecreationCommiss' •i.on meetings,The attached report •p is for City Council infor 'recommendation of the Pa informationon a.nd therkandRecreationCommiss'ion. At the June 18th Park •and Recreation Commission 'missioner Christianson meeting, Com_ the City Co made a motion to approve aY • uncil the Committee Dr e and send to by Commissioner Ewald• aft on Open Space; seAyes: A11. SUBJECT OPEN SPACE IT IS THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION THAT A NEW ADVISORY COMMISSION BE APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND IDENTIFIED AS: OPEN SPACE AND WETLAND'PRESERVATION COMMISSION IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THAT THIS COMMISSION CONSIST OF A MINIMUM OF 6 MEMBERS TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH STAFF OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN CONNECTION. WITH THE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND. WITH OTHER SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. IT IS ALSO RECOMMENDED THAT ONE MEMBER OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION BE ASSIGNED TO THIS COMMISSION TO ASSIST IN COORDINATING THE ACTIVITIES OF THESE TWO GROUPS.. THE PURPOSE OF THE COMMISSION WOULD BE TO IDENTIFY ALL WETLANDS AND OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD AND TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC. PLAN TO PRESERVE SUCH LANDS FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. A. THE PRIMARY GOAL WOULD BE IDENTIFY AND DEVELOP AN INVENTORY OF ALL.OPEN SPACE AND WETLANDS THAT.: 1, ARE NEEDED FOR FUTURE WATER MANAGEMENT PURPOSES; 2. WOULD BE NATURAL EXTENSIONS OF PRESENTLY -HELD PUBLIC SPACE SUCH AS PARKS, TRAILS, ETC.; 3. CONTAIN SPECIAL FEATURES SUCH AS WOODLANDS, PLAINS, OR NATURAL HABITATS FOR WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION, ETC..; METHODS OF IDENTIFYING SUCH LANDS WOULD REQUIRE FIELD INSPEC- TIONS, REVIEW OF EXISTING MAPS OF OTHER GROUPS SUCH AS. THE DNR, WATERSHED DISTRICT, ETC., AND NEW MAPPING PROCEDURES. (IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT SOME OF THE LOCAL COLLEGES BE CONTACTED TO SEE IF THIS WOULD BE OF INTEREST TO ANY STUDENT OR CLASS AS A PROJECT.,) B. ONCE IDENTIFIED, THESE LANDS WOULD NEED TO BE PRIORITIZED BY: 1. SECTORS OF THE CITY, INFLUENCED BY PRESENT, PAST AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS 20 SIZE OF AREAS IDENTIFIED 3 TYPE OF LAND (WET - DRY) C. CONCURRENT WITH GOALS A,& B., IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO DEVELOP TWO BUDGETS. ONE FOR EXPENSES INVOLVED IN DEVELOPING THE PLAN AND ONE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN, INCLUDING ACQUISITION AND.MANAGEMENT COSTS. 1. PLAN BUDGET -- MILEAG.E, MAPPING COSTS, MATERIALS DRAFTING EXPENSES, COMPUTER COSTS, PER DIEMS 2. ACQUISITION & MANAGEMENT BUDGET - APPRAISAL FEES LEGAL FEES, LAND COSTS D. ONCE.COSTS ARE ESTABLISHED, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY METHODS OF FUNDING THESE COSTS. 1. REFERENDUM /TAXES 2.. SEWER CHARGES /ASSESSMENTS 3, TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 4. GRANTS (FOUNDATIONS, MEMORIALS, CHARITABLE GAMBLING ) AND OTHER DONATIONS IN.ADDITION, WE WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THESE COMMISSION MEMBERS BE PAID AT THE RATE OF $5 PER HOUR UP TO A MAXIMUM OF $50 PER MONTH FOR.* - THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF SERVICE AS THE START -UP TIME WILL REQIRE SIGNIFICANT TIME COMMITMENT, ABOVE AND BEYOND THE NORMAL VOLUNTEER EXPECTATIONS. AFTER SIX MONTHS, THEY WILL CONTINUE ON A. VOLUNTEER BASIS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 2.5 YEARS, AT WHICH TIME THEY WILL BE UP FOR RE- APPOINTMENT. AGENDA NUMBER AGENDA REPORT Actio by Counol • TO: City MHager n orse -..... FROM: Finance 'Cod,i'i erg,„Director JRe j eoted„. .RE:SCHEDULE EVIEW DaEMEETINGTOto 1989 ANNUAL FINANCIDATE: Jul ` AL REPORT 16Y 1990 RRecently the C i tR s - c Y 1989 Annual Financial Report and Audit wprepared, were completed. Three 1} General .Purpose FinancialCOmprehensi Report - containsveAnnualFinancial data extracted frtheCity's fin Report and provides m thefinancialalcondition . Co 1 e a cone i se summar oftotheCaPsofthreportwilladvisoryptwiY W i l l be available to th y boards and comma s be distributedbutedsons. Also, a 1epublic, imi ted suppl 2} Comprehens Annual Financial Report*- containsstatisticalin deta i 1 e •to provide complete d financial andtransactionsBurinpeteinformation •to the the year. Copies of on all financialWane aleCounci1, State Aud ' th s report will be ' •Poors bo Auditor, Moody Inve d str butedndinvestors, and the tors Service, StaneMaplewoodLibrary Bard and 3 y• Management Letter - contains theregardingfinancial auditors, comments antoandFinance Co ies d recommendationstheCouncil1pofthisletterwill •ance staff at the a be distributedbutedendofthismonth.It is recommended discuss that the Council scussthesereports chedule a meeting with the auditors toimmediPLastyearasec • g w ately preceding are P ial meeting was heggutarCouncilmeeting, 1d at 6.30 .m.P tmc Agenda Number --, Action by Co all T0: FROM RE: DATE: City Manager AGENDA REPORT Human Resource Director FITNESS CENTER COVERAGE July 16 1990 Endorse Mo d i f i e d,...r,,...... Rejected,., date At the last Council meeting, staff was directed to Previous,, Fitness check onPssCentermembershipsforCouncilmembers. 1985 wasthefirstyearthatnon - police employees w • s. were providedmemberships. Three City Councilmembers. Charlotte Wasiluk andMaryLeeMaidain1985, and Norm Anderson in 1986 •have had City -paid Fitness Center memberships. Employees not attending the Fitness Center thirtycarterw' • t y perqwithoutalegitimatereasonandwhowanttocontinue s are responsible ue theirmemberships, p nsible for paying the $54.00 quarterly fee. GJB: kas Aotion b Counoii:i MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO: City Manager Modified FROM: Director of COMmunit Rejected----- SUBJECT: 2264-2292 Larpente y v en DoteDATE: July 17,1 1990 ur Avenue The city Council, on Ma 14, '1990, Passed a motion that if the conditions for movin the homes on 2264-2292werenotmet-b July 15 the Cit Larpenteur Avenueassesstheowners re nearin y shall complete the homes and work to finish 0 The homes ag completion u Cave still has some . The main problem/ b t Mr.with the second house from the corners The Council will beonallfoursides. Mrs Cave informs me that he wanted brick is Plannin to Put brick on the front s and sidin on the other three sides. I will have the Buildin Official stop the work if this happens. IwillalsodiscuthiswiththeCityAttorneandhavea furtherreportforyou go/memoi 1-mem (sect, 24-29) T- y MEMORANDUM TO: City ManagerFROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Perm Fees for 'Underground eAPPLICANT: Sto • ghauniceyGriggs (Griggs Contracting,DATE: July 16, 1990 INTRODUCTION Refund Request Action by Council:, Endorsed,,.... Modif i erg .......e_._..._ Rejecte Date Tanks Inc.) Mr. Griggs is requesting a refund of part of the permit fee paidforanundergroundtankinstallation. (See the letter on page 4.) Staff Request Staff a reduction in the permit fee for undergroundgandtankinstallationandremoval, `Thee current fee, .is calculatedusingtheBuildingCodefee. The ildin Code fee has twoo partsthepermitfeeandtheplanreviewfee. Both parts are based onapercentageoftheproject's value. Staff is recommending thattheCouncildroptheplanreviewfeesinasincethereisminimalplanreviewneeded.The fee would then be similar to most othercities. Reason for the Request The City charged Mr. Griggg $716.85 for a permit to replace anundergroundtankatSt. Paul's Priory, He feels that this fee wasexcessive. DISCUSSION Staff surveyed 18 communities in the metro area about ermit feesundergroundtanks. Of the surveyed p esforundycities, four methods fordeterminingpermitfeesforundergroundtankswerefound. Thesewere: flat fees, one percent of the project value, the BuildingCodefeeschedulewithaplanreviewfeeandtheschedulewithoutthe Building Code plan review fee Staff used a $51,,000 tankreplacementprojecttocomparefeesineachcityrangedfrom $ 15 in Co Y he permit feesrangCotGroveto $716.85 In four cities. Seethepermitfeesurvey. n page 3. cities. (See p g ) The medi permit was $444.50.The median fee was based on the State permit fee schedule with noplancheckfeecollected. Maplewood's permit in this case was716,85 Dropping the plan review fee will bring Ma lewood's fee intowithwhatothercitiescha p line charge. The plan review fee is not needed,since there is minimal plan review done b our staff. St li Y ate lawrequiresthatallsuchapplicantscantssubmittheirplanstotheStateFireMarshalforreview. In the case cited above thewithnoplancheckfeewouldhave permit feemi e been $535.50 instead of $716.85. This is a savin ofg $272.35. While staff recommendsds a reduction In the feearefundtoMrGri s. T schedule, we do notrecommend money gg his would set a precedentgneytoeverytankInstaller thatmayinvolverefundingPermitunderourcurrenwhoaidfshouldonly fee schedule, h :e new f or a Y apply to future app..:,:caltions ee schedule RECOMMENDATIONS I. Take no action on the refund request. 2• Adopt the resolution on page 6 which sets the e •for tank installations an permdremoval t feestheStateBuildingThesefeesareldzngCodefeeschedulew' based onwithnothestatesurtaxcharge, plan check fee plusgus kenmem36.' Attachments 1• Permit fee surve2 • April 27 1990 letteretter from Gri s Con3. May 25, 1990 memo from gg Ing 4• .Resolution Joe Schmidt of Westside Equipmentqulpment 2 EXAMPLE CASE FOR PERMIT FEES This case included the remoandtheinstallation al of 30and underallatlonofnew10, 000- .all underground tank this project was $ Th on tank. T , a value of costs : e fees listed, below inclu all C l Permit Fee Cottage Grove Columbia Heightsg 15-00 Flat fees EdeEden P 40.00 Brooklyn Center 50.00 Golden Valle y 87.00 Blaine 140 0 0 0 Fridley 150000 New Brighton 150.0o 180400 Crystal Shoreview $444.50 Building Code but white.Bear Lake $444.50 no plan revie f ee Apple Valley Inver Grove Heig 535.50 1% of valuat'ghts $ Maple Grove 535.50 lon 535,50 New Hope Roseville $716.85 Building Code, South St. Paul $716.85 with plan review Woodbury $716.85 fee Maplewood $716.85 716.85 Median fee 444.50 3 Attachment 1 s CottractlX l PETROLEUM EQUIPMENT - SALES AND SERVICE d30 SHOR£WEW PARK ROAD SHORCV EW. MV 53,26 . to 12 48204" FAX to 12) 484 -60" 4/27/90 City of Maplewood Community Deye-1 opment 1830 E. County Rd. B. Maplewood, MN 55109 Attn: Marge Ostrum Re: .Excessive permit f .ee for tank installation. Dear Ms Ostrum, I am aski for a refund for a substantial portion, of the $716-85 • permitfeewepaid (P 1686) on 71.31;. 89 •for a tank installation 'permit for St. Pains Priory. We supplied eng specifications9pcations from Gausman & Moore and State approved plans in the required number of copies, I expected permit fees of $100.00 based on experiences •with other cities. Instead we paid for: installersnstallers license Permit fee 70.00 Surtax 419.00 Plan check 25.50 -- 272.35 Total 786.85IfeelthesechargesareeXc -ass'eve and out of Tine with the chair 0 esofothercommunities. 4 Possible three inspections were performed of this jobsite b the 'y City of Maplewood. A refund of an approximateppoximate amount would be appreciated. Sincerely, r C Chauncey W. 7Gi s President 9 4 Attachment 2 AW Z 1i iw I(UmI M I nr %Z1 612) 478 -9572 WIESTSI DE r-CUIVAEST PETROLEUM & AUTOMOTIVE HANDLING EQUIPMENT SALES, SERVICE. INSTALLATION 10E SCHMIDT 902 HIGHWAY 55 SUPERVISOR /ESTIMATOR MEDINA MN 55340 0 Q 0 0 r !t NO CARBON PAPER REQUIRED: Type or write on original — impression will a { ometically appear on copies dene OATE- 0.PRIORITY a I UROENTI PN SOON AS POSSIBLE ATTENflAa NO REPLY NEEDED 1 TY ....... .... ; 0. (3 SU T .C.cm.rn..c.,.iv... .... IJvuGo err, Iry r - III ..L 30:....... .... 4..4rlQe . ....... ts t G tr FO /4 C. L Y / "LT P t9 N /= . Z" cur9 fir - ti. T re'W Tor So G c. / K .. .. ... yo tt.p . ......... 0 rj-1 t= > ..:. T- /c o , . v c r e "1 6ZG / kr a __ 0 u C 7d..... /.y. Q W.4v. N¢ r. . na u c, lip e n-t Cf Grc _ . C 4 Jet 0 4 SIGNED- V0 GATE OF REPLY: gEPLY TO• r J7C Y MAY 2 199p SIGNED: SENDER: MAIL RECIPIENT WHITE AND PINK SHEETS. RECIPIENT: WRITE REPLY. RETURN WHITE TO SENDER. KEEP THIS PINK COPY. 5 Attachment 3 TANK PERMIT FEE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Map 'installed and removed. p od Inspects fuel tanks whe n WHEREAS , he City mayt . cha rg fees t .such ins ectiot Y o cover its 'expensesppses for NOW, THEREFORE, be i resolved that the City Couxc ichargingfueltan. permit lapproves on the State BuildingPiusthestatesurtax a1pl icants permit fees bCodefeeschedulewitheased char h no plan check feege. ADOPTED 1990. 6 Attachment 4 1-5 fiction by Councils MEMORANDUM Endorsers Ci Man Modified,..TO: y g FROM: Director of .Community Development Rejecte SUBJECT: Mechanical Permit Fees Date DATE: July 16, 1990 The mechanical inspe is requesting an in%.ease in mechanical permit fees. The city last increased these fees over nine years ago. As a result, they are below what other cities are charging. The proposed fee schedule is typical of other cities. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached fee schedule. go \memo7.mem (5.5 Fees) Attachments: 1. Existing Residential Fees 20 Existing Commercial Fees 3. Proposed Residential Fees 40 Proposed Commercial Fees I EXISTING RESIDENTIAL.FEE SCHEDULE 1. Forced Air Residential - Gas or Oil Fired 2. Hot Water Boiler - Residential 3. Central Air Conditioningg - Residential 4. Repairs, additions or alterations to existing heating,cooling or ventilatilon syste 5. Wood- burning Stoves, Furnaces, Free S •Standing Fireplaces,Zero Clearance Fireplaces, Approved typePyp Addon Wood -burning Furnaces 1st $500.00 valuation Each Additional $200 valuation 6. , Gas Piping 7. Electric Heat - same as as or oil fig red.Includes Heat Pumps - Residential) Commercial - BTU's - 1st 100,000 Each additional 100,000 BTU or fraction thereof 2 30.00 40.00 10.00 10.00 per $500 cost or fraction thereof. 20.00 5.00 10.00 per unit 30.00 50.00 10.00 Attachment 1 EXISTING COMMERCIAL FEE SCHEDULE CITY' OF MAPLEWOOD Commercial Reating, Cooling nd Ventilationon Perini. t Fees 1. STEAM OR HOT WATER BOILERS - COMMERCIAL (Also forced air - commercial)rcia.. ) 1st 100,000 BTU Each additional 100,000 B $ 50.00BTUorfractionthereof1000 2.AIR CONDITIO OR CHILLED . WATER - •ER Commercial 1st 100 BTU Each additional 100 000 BBTU or fraction thereof 50.00 1 0.00 30 REFRIGERATION - COMMERCIAL Walk -in Coolers,. Meat Care, Frozen1st100,000 Food Care, etc.00 BTU Each-additional 100,000 BTU or fraction thereofereof 50.00 10000 Note] 12,000 BTU er ton •P of refrigeration, 40 STEAM OR HOT WATER UNIT HEATERS - COMMERCIAL 1st 100,000 BTU Each additional 100,000 ' BTU 1,50 Note] Usually installed along ith Steamteam or Hot Water Boiler 5.STEAM OR HOT WATER OR CHILLED WATER COILS - COMMERCIAL 1st Coil Each additional coil 2.00 1.00 Note] Installed along ith St •g Steam or Hot Water Bonder or Chiller. 09 ROOFTOP UNITS - UNIT. HEATERS GAS FIRED - COMMERCIAL 1st 100,000 BTU Each additional 100,000 BTU or fraction thereof 50.00 10000 Note] Add up total number of BTU 7. VENTILATION Systems up to 3000 CFM $5.00 for 1st 1000 CFM and $3.00 for each additional1000CFM. Systems over 3000 CFM $10.00 for the 1st 3000 CFM and $2.00 for each additional1000CFM. Note) No permit for ventilation less than $10.00. 8. ALTERATIONS? REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS to existing heating, cooling or ventilationsystems $10.00 per $500.00 cost or fraction thereof. 90 GAS PIPING 10.00 per unit 3 Attachment 2 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE RESIDENTIAL HEATING, COOLING VENTILATION & GAS PIPING PERMIT FEES 25.00 Minimum Fee for Permit 10.00 GAS PIPING - $500.00 valuation or less •repair or installation). 4.00 Each additional $500.00 cost of repair •p or installation. GAS OR OIL FIRED FURNACES OR BOILERS - 20.00 First 100,000 BTU input or less. 3.00 Each additional 100,000 input or fraction thereof. WARM AIR OR HOT WATER HEATING SYSTEM 25.00 First 100,000 BTU input for construction or alteration of anywarmairfurnaceductworkperunit. 4.00 Each additional 100,000 BTU input or fraction.P lon. 2.5.00 First 100 BTU input per unit for construction or alterationtionofeachhotwatersystemperunit. 4.00 Each additional 100,000 BTU input or fraction. 25.00 First 100,000 BTU input per unit for installation1lation or replacementofeachhotwatersystemperunit. 4.00 Each additional 100,000 BTUs or fraction thereof. 15.00 Per unit on unit heaters, based on first 100,000 BTU input. 3.00 Each additional 100,000 BTU input or fractionPLion thereof. AIR CONDITI 20.00 First 5 tons (60,000 BTUs) of air conditioning per unit,g P lt. 25.00 First 5 tons (60,000 BTUs) of cooling or ducttworkfor air conditioning. 3.00 Each ton (12,000 BTUs) or fraction thereof over first 5 tonsforductworkforairconditioning 25.00 Wood Burning Furnace per unit 25.00 Swimming Pool Heater per unit 20.00 Air exchanger with duct work P er unit 20.00 Gas or oil spacer heater per unit 20.00 Gas direct vent heater per unit 20.00 Gas fireplace log or heater per unit 4 Attachment 3 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL FEE SCHEDULE Gas Piping, Refrigeration, Chilled WaterVentilateg • on, Exhaust, Hot W F Pneumatic ControlSstem' , Steam, and Warm Air H 'eating This fee shall be $50 plus 1 1/4 epercent of the tot •e of the work must inc' al valu of the work. Valu ationinstallation, alter elude the coatlon, addition and repairs, ofhoods, •HVAC units and heat t epalrs, includin fantransferunitsaland g s'materials necessary for installation 1 laborincludeallmateri - In additionthosematerials and equipment su It shallaterialsarenormallyplbyothersourceysuppliedbytheminimumfeeshallone s when 1 be $50, contractor, The 5 Attachment 4 Action by CourtGil:; MEMORANDUM Endcarse . "". Iodifie TO : r ' City Manager Re ecteFROM: Director Co DSUBJECTCommunityDevelopment ate Beaver Lake and Hills Plans Neighborhood Land Use DATE: Jul 16 199 The City Council asked for a •n. informal presentation of land 'the Beaver Lake and. Hillside .gine .ghborhoods , south o f LAvenue, that. the City is.an arpenteur Council felt the planning for multiple dweill srewastoomuchlandplanned The dwellings in these areas, p d for multiple e I have attached maps of themultipledwellings. parcelsplannedfor Most . of these sites are also zoned for multiple dwellings.result, rezoning these sites lings. As atescouldresultinlawsuitCouncilshouldtrytoidentifys• The rezonin s, 1fY the public purpose for tgThiswouldgivetheCitythese defending the council' Y Attorney some psi forsaction. RECOMMENDATION Decide which .properties to schedule hearingforpublic go /memo17.mem (Plan Update file)Attachments: land use and zoning maps uU11CULU,LLLAAAAJLALK r a m .. RI 0S. L cc _ Mm it a LSC os fir.•:'•': • cn sum 0 o V) 111,: B-W y. : ~ y;. ti.'i.. '•Y . ;•:iVii: ~Y :•:i: asnounN •' • •• • •. •. i ; i ! , y i.:ti; ii •4 y::.w. '- . . •i'•S! • i . J• j: y; is y r..w.. r..w. arf • ft i •iihi •-h:: •Ji iii i•; •. j. : • may.: i :.N • •i •. ii.'iiy: :•owl I .. ciTlj!' 1 4 f - i Hillside LAND USE PLAN 2 L a rp'enteu r a R I. lee." Ilk Sc 1 n NOUN maoteria Maryland Ave. m Stillwater Road SC Harve A V w A A E s her ••. minnehaha BEAVER LAKE LAND USE PLAN 11 Q N 2634.11 , IF , i . tau.+ :;.;.;.;: . .....o t , o {• '+ • ; ;•ESL' , t m U Solt drlv.swo. °sw:t V N. S. P. b 1• , al oao , t A Sit S. LO . R3 a ck M2 L V! 44 a i 2 0 V :, Z ! " U) Q as So 1 ma zoo*. / nj ni 1 . 31. s3 PUD IF R 3 040 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP STUDY AREA 1 4 1 1 • 1 N.a. r • O i 6 S W' s) J w V' s.o _ — _ O C9 5 „.._ _±)7S0' 930• star r eo u 10_ ' — II —12 13 14 15 16 4 Z 2 as•t , .a•. 111 iti f i D A H O 3 0 13 • w w . a).2 f• s rf• 1000' w 100.0' ILS 416 ... o f ) o . 1 14 • (4 oe 1 • I!. f '^' 111 6 a9 " .'.. .•.G . . g 4 W (a7) 171 .` C ) 4 6 1 co 10 It IZ 13 14 IS 16 17 18 ti w.,,E .tom) <a.;t a =, 14 a , « as es,,t•.ta ._ HOYT_I000' n e`r =' r o R I IIG ,36 CU_ 1 Kfi 2634.11 , IF , i . tau.+ :;.;.;.;: . .....o t , o {• '+ • ; ;•ESL' , t m U Solt drlv.swo. °sw:t V N. S. P. b 1• , al oao , t A Sit S. LO . R3 a ck M2 L V! 44 a i 2 0 V :, Z ! " U) Q as So 1 ma zoo*. / nj ni 1 . 31. s3 PUD IF R 3 040 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP STUDY AREA 1 4 Cam; t GG atr,l. rS. ; M O „~ Z Jl.l O " 0., w f 9. l ? LLJ 1 I /_• w ht) + ,4 . of 15 16 Ip 331 _+ , , D !O r 10 GsJ • 10 • f a r to ,+• ` • ' ' .. ' • /_ - t4' (•a) • ., • • O.Z.:: w 4v 00) (Sf) Cam) 04 (s.! 14 r• 1 •' 1S •la ,•o il f,• rn JT.r• q i•4 , ? IN.frt 104.43*. . o* r•fa. AfMM t\ »< 100.0 . t , n 2 t• - - .— H4YL t.1v • — 3 s) . 1 r t b!. • • MONTANA •,s. Pv AVE. t• "' 00 .i CONDOMINIVM No. t,; 1Jr wwf..,o n i 3 i" i AcogN GREENMOUS[s S N M (SX : b i Or w H '+ OUTLOT u"M.ML! i4- 3s !,t. 100 .• .0 (07 •nw f. t • •.t R1 I ' ; tf 86 f _ N! • t ygob 1f2 LNTIRt rRNCt I! G ORAINAb [ ESA} M • OUTLOT IW / V i (for) . Y J r w 17 : O 1 _ J • • n ' r ` y . „ s• !t f SK i..r F,w. H 0• N o N sa.a, . 2 S N• lRN .-AI • man1 G 0 I '-' w (tt) w C 4 ! 3 0 7 2 d , 9 :;.,...•.•.:•; :•'•: ,•: %'•.':•: %'• • Cv na• • /.. _ f t fir r4 J Iw) O % (k) ' )6 9 ) '•%'i : :: S{• 1 : . ;;;••; yS :1 i ••:}% S• •}• • •S jj {f } jY. , , Sam-m1 • 101 ! .1 N . 1M1` /O M e ;•;•'•.• • },•' 'r:;•;1' j . •: i••'{ •' ,{ • S• } r•'y' •' }• - S••; S'j':•jr•• • ''• ' y ••• . • • ri10 `OI An ' •'••{ • :•: • •;:Yir :S ' : r: • r j . • j':' •s! i NEBRASKA J , ;; •..., , ,:, • •% S7r ,,:• 11.0 AVE :' N. R.M . :•:' •i • • : NN -i • . i j . j ••i r :%. • { • v Lall ( I JJ IS.J • •• 7. I j • : : r • : • :•Si•:: {::; ii': y:; • • , ,, • f •. "' f} • _ y III 7 7! S• M I /t. •;•• iry;y {;•• {•:'•.••;• ' ,'rY a ! 3 (f, (!l) V C7e) (i S) V& ! OU T LO T N), (iii {;:•: : :•••.• •::y;.;.:•:•::•:•. • r . y • •. r:• .j { 1 1 r 8 / 2 2 F•• 3 Q : r.•... y ; : • :•.• •• ti .•.• ;. r:; Y•Y j r .¢7; 0.: ' 7 ADD. ' , ° i t S • .',.y;''' • • • S • {. d'' • • , r.`Of. ) ,1 4 + / U • •• y';r: %i . •• • :; {j•;.: • {•i , • • ,i fj ,•' • , f: ,, • • I ;ir :;•: :'i` :%:• •''% :• :'' YS•.;.SrrjrY' •' •y}'S. •jio,Y•ir167-1V -1 r. .y J / ~ •`, .1 :' •; • .• {? •}Y;,: Y'jL, jr• r:• . ' -rr •'y;.;. r : L :;. y,• • ••' •'i } y y r•Y rr •i• r• j0 • ^ 1 .. 1 (... / Il, S;{y ;:••'•".'• Y • S,yj •. . j • r f •• • . 1' : • . .. y ^ . 7 y ' S•: :r•S r',•'• rrjr ' :{ jY••.,r•'rj•'•,••{'•• • .'j••i'i S% ' ' •'•' ' •:••a... • R .• Qt 1 4 ( y •1 0I1 •Irra'jr • { {• y • •;A •' 1 r;y ,•. • ri• S j gme • ..' 1.t• f71t0 w ' ` I •` - '^ /t•/4 .S;•,.`',, :4: }:ti :'; • '". 'fi.'i• •Y ,fr {. r' • •• • f,• r ,711. •7 (1! 4J ,+ , •' • , r .4 :;•;:1 :•'•'• • S • r '• • , • ' ::••Yr • {'•' , • ii•:•' •' j • ,• • j • ',i%Yjj • S', :.Zzi1 ; GPI) 2 . w wE T L A Np t K ,•t ,•~ _ I1 : f O< 9 • 1 + • y14 r :i' g :: }Y: :'.•_' :•.j•:/• S ' ••: r' •• • • 4'Ir , •' ff r i ' a r' • i w w w i 1 e+ t ' 0 1 t • : '•'• '••r: r ::'• : " •,.y:•: • ' • •:•,. S. j • ' ,' • {. r :;: , hOO. 4•AND f, 0 • •, •;•, {fy {:' :•'' •' ;:: :•S •P • r •.,•C•' •L• ' r • • .} ;j rrf • ,; {•• , N 1 1 1 I.• 1 % • r • • •• •;y'YS• Y• j • +'• j i • S} { {'•' • y, •Y•' •'" rti';• { .11 • 1) 3 :;';? ; %;.;,; }:: r r : , ::• r.:':'•S •'• f . •:', } S r: rr .fr. r . • Y r •.jr.; % Q i iWrates+ e, • 4 . • : '•: :•:•:;.; •'• :• •.. SS ' :;•d :rrr: {:;• '' } ., rir•; }•rf Yjf •' ,. j f f ' • r i .. , / 1 1 _+ ; i `f 1 0J, }: :ir: ' "fS'• j '• ` • SY :'S f' •'Y'% { . i • j r %•",'%' l: j S • j •%•, j , t S) I , •1 L f 2r. l •, ;,'',.,',,• :• {S • - •"v %.SSS . r1 't•'•':' • •r :'r'• {'•j•'jj Si' d ' j • •'y : ; { • rlll... M O 1 Ot. , , ;,' .:"•; .S• •:{ r r•SS ••ySS ' ':; rS.; y'; •{ • Y• {•;.;,5'r Y' S '• ' f {' • f • , •' , .Y r i' %' ii %. • .. • :: :•::: • • . • .•'•r : • :•' •' • : • :' • . • • •:Y: •• "' . • • rrr•S • •' rr r ' • r' S. YTy ..I r••oYiS jr.T.'•t rI . }.• ...... :•:•: ' ,• S:r,.'.•.....:i•' :•. ... •.v3.• .fi . yr. fi:.: x . • :..•3...y.'= i r •t•• tw bS•i i S tSS Kp yr' ::•.• :•:.• .:•. • .r1 •... • • • • • • •.I•. :S• :•:'• .4 : .`..r • ': :•:•'•1r 0 Y. {•....•. •,J .. j Ar:•. 2.. ..• d X.1 X. I Y M r t to N Sy :•:r :ti Vfl • i . i vvx lipr %%.N .10 I r' y:::::::::::::: •' tia 1 PUD Np 0 w•b' 1M . . . . ... N. ri s L . lot A& • t7 220., its r) sold ir tlf -L t 1 t 0 i a. fi R 3 AC 4 boundary I" t rU + - ,; d...•.. Sze,..., `.i q rp . 7u•• 1•,•„a•. Pi ,L•o,s . 43 nt . w • 107A6 f 14. 7 f, Olr. t F fir'' \ a (43) , PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP STUDY AREA 2 R' 1 5 ml t• OPP 10 .......... vo tjo 19AL00 X4 m6oVot" PUD L Isi 040 F :•: 00 IVY 02 344a 6 doo js) 0 PROPERTY LINE/ZONING MAP STUDY AREA 3 6 N. S. P. Q n R3 A Monona swoon am'simummummis massm ml fu ma - IN IN 12 94%&. I c3 s•.., • cis ,,,,de R R3 IL 0 IN IN 0 I ew cat IT WE alwidw -ww 0 3 10 so 130 ivy I a 7- ta,R 3 NWA . a . . X R3 w--% v a N ' V %rl& PROPERTY LINE/ZONING MAP STUDY AREAS SA AND 58 66 bus k 40 R- 3 1 - 141 WIN Is 167.n , LOT 4. vnw 1 R3 b AVE t u F42` I 108) L „ II I R R3 241y 'lerw 0 - . r 1 r 3 M 0 ' -0s 1e4.e3 ' Isto a. Ir It ID PUD o • r k3 F S N 1 •: _ 0 tl a2 2C ! ., o 0`r4• Vo IMAPLAX-Ans S.Y.. . ?'• .5;. Y a t g3A J eN i O kat w S•r c •tiv'•r • it' t: ::............•.r sEmaySY :•: •• :•iii : h :• :: iii• }:•i :• }i y }ti Ah•: : :•:r•• J r.OSSS :•. yyy •.'.. ... i X. X . e on 0, T.•:: -::: i ':h• i }••. :•••: rr: •SS•. :V: rrr: •:• • .1. •• • . • • • • w • • D• ..... .... .. .. ii • :::• :•••.••... •••• .•..••..• . .... 1 1 ar .S f t rte : : n c .4. G • • •.•:.•: r :'rte• :' :•:•: :•.•.• ::•.: •. i :. ::: i:: • :... . • . • . • .. • • ..h • . ::•••••:i> i . .SY.L ••T•ice•.• 4 OT 9 r r t 143 N S7 ti / 1 l •:r.: :• y v ;:11 :•:;:;: ;:•} :;ii;;.•.:•:: rrr'• ': ::•:• };• :•:'i :•: . -. ii :•: ::•:: :Y; ......•..:: rr } }:• ::•: :.;•;• . _ 1/ y f? 1. }:~?; :::5 ::: i R r: r..;.; • .Y..:• •: • •. ::5•: r .•:..M• :•:ib;.;.;• :S S :1. .•• S •>tr0 .:':•:• :•:• ':`:' :•::•i ::..; .... • ,• . :; :;.,w .:.;: :•:• :O .S • . S 40 000 0 ) wl moxM114• , rY :ti }.•.., ;, >, r........:x. .... 41 f a Y r. : :::•;::P•' ': i•'• :•;•'; Y'tiSSSV tiS'•'•' PUD f O f + s1' • l:: .. • • } ; i•.• :•.w.•:' :: •i :''•: Yi1• • . 7; • : :•.'}: :i> • r1.,:S;i • _f . O 7 O '• ti•: .•.V: ••. >Y:'w1 i :r • h':V. • w . .: • . • .:.w,0•.S :.4 •r:•.:•r. i _ 1 •1< S SO 1 i .:..• •O :•:L'•2 O iO • i }.' 'r .fit •sra S 4 s A.'bV . yvJ •Rs ..J • +nSJS3 ' rS ':•: S :b :SS : :•.••' hS :.;.;: •; .°Ci: R' sat j . Z hN 1 :- :•: ::,:s::•::•:•:::•:ti ::•: v A A 1 f'1 r L 2.5 r .... . . :•:•::•: :;: ':::::•5:: .: }::::..... ;, o 1310 a$ -- - ::: . ; ?f'i:Ar'r. '•: :•. }!y'1:.iM}i••:.... :•:: .... • .. t r o G 4 1 SOn ?+i•i D0. . !! :::•::•: :•::•:;L':::•'• _ w 1 MARYLAND AVENUE C2 5) PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP STUDY AREA 6 Q N lime looda. cc i c _ • fv. , l 2 32- N - -- •.. 1 w ' r N , r .• $s 1! , J • ` ,o •" r/ 9.82 Z • ' . M ` i boundary L i :•:: i :':• ::•i :•:: '•Y::.:•: • :• • •: • : :• %'• : :':'.S :Y. :•: • : : : : :i• "•':•r:SL• • • : : :0 r • • • • • •r• • '• :S•'' : r :,' , '•'• tr:{ ::•::i• :S :S•::•':• i •.. • • • , . , :' • • , r . • •'r• :•i•:•4 • :1 . • • . • • • ,•r . •S7' ••:'• • . • • • Vi;:ti;.• •':. :::L::• • ' :. : :Y • • :LrL' •LLY•. Y • •,• 1 :: • • SMS • • , L,., • • . x0 ••• :L•: x•;;: J::: r:•:S :•:;: t LS :'•Li1i : :':•:•:•'• : i•:•:•i :•:''r•S':`:•i ':•;• :'+ '• i ::•.• • • { •:•iTi1• \S. • • • ., ., •, ..S • • S ••: %:• % %'ii : iLSD :• '' ••,'i•Y • • • • r • • J: • • '•rTr • •SL • • • .S • l :'.:• • . T : f • • • Jr:,•• i•:•' : :•:•:• :•.•.•.•: • :::: :S•' :': • • :;iLi : •S • • • ••r. :: •LLL• S :.,• . J • L • •.: • •'•• :•: T. :•:• . i•• : :•:•'i7i • • •: :':• ' T•'•' :•• :•:•'' • .''t {. : ::' •: :L : :•:Y•• •: L.S' • O • :•'• :••: • r • i :: : ::5i •T x i r .. r .r LS Lrr Sz VX t•r co fitr•• ..J r s r r S• L ;S•r:'r ..SY SYr :.•.SL •r••TY : Sx .- - . 1 • rr .•L. r ..S,S 1r ...X . ix- Yr ..i. •:O ••• .• :.•••..•. :••. Z W.-M 7, lip 7 mri0.S 11 39 J T• a• LY r r LS i . r .•r' P • yy__ r•j• 1 V L • •.. 1 T r ...1• It• • • . 0. i • : :• '•::•:••' : fir.::;. ;.: ::;. ;.,. .. . :• - . tal 1310 -a tea m.^ 26q.5.00 _ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP STUDY AREA 7 10 Q N r i Qv - 24YIARTLAN © is V — ' 13i3' ' il: w ;r-w- -`Z/ t.1 cr of,9 13 is to 4 J -1E •• • • r ; ; tal) (. ;;`,;, •: •• ' r2 3 • ' 6 J i car) ..(! 1 tf) lu) c1). o ,: : :', , , • „ 110 11 "14 IS 20E• w v 10 I . ' r OS •:;: 5`. • {•: d •d. iI a l i p • , I .. r SR I r r 8 7 4• • / AV I ...' 06% y . r:::`.scti.'ti: {f. , .•y' ' •. =*' I c ,r , {. 1 . . 1 ' 11 s x j; i p• r {; : i ` i : •• • • .. . r . • • f •Y'i r • • rr• •. /. jf (A. ` ). " N _ • I / i 1 ( : : i t • ••, •_ • - •' {:•:•'•'• SS S .A ••'•S';{••• ; • • • • f •:' S .•••y:r1•i•:;:•• ^.' , eI I(s /) 1 ( • ; Ti • jy1 Ii 1 r• :•r:•;• ` ' • r S:•' r j { . rrr,.f ,,• aria Ir . s t`ir S • • • •.• r • ;, r' y1• N }v•S.. f .Z S' ' Sii S• rr • • • •• •Y • r q • • v • l •" _ i 1. 14 .•111 fk w) '• 033 :fi. Sr r .•: ;;,, GERA AA •; •.... OWNJ1 `• I U 1 1 AVE_ — •L •'•'r {••••S •':;:• S•'• '••':•'•• { { {1 •'•'• S :; •'• •' • `r :;: S JI eD 'S p • S:;iS • • {;SV:`• • •• 'r • ••••• i :•1 • r • • • /.ef !a. • 1 (Y ' r S 0 O i.!' .3 e } Yt , y • 1 ''s`ty, • ••• •• . {•;{• • •••• • • ' • • '• '' r :•• :• •' ••S•:• S :s {•'rJ r E RAN 1 1 M 1 fn ,, > .. qtly. :•.'. • { • • - S•l 76 le. ......5 3 •! 4 1 '••••. • }Y f`S •e "a f1:• S • • j•;? • ` • • {f r y { "' (A w . T T- +L• •• 84 :i:: :r • '. •S A :•:; 5 ; :;: {Y: '•'•••• { • f 4};• ' • •'' • • r::••,{ • ti • • d {;i :• 41 37 + j1 • .: :i; : •S ;: {•:•'•• •.v • vj • {•i • •••S { • .:` S'fr • {i;G • { {1 `• 4 I • 11 " 107 /i :ti • ••• :•• f -.7• • • S y. Y • • • i r :•. • r. • • 111r.` . S••.:L .; S4 • . ?_ "•;r7GY r• :` {S • iY '•' .: v' : r • { ' T wf ISi +TItiS • .• : •• {••• :•S •':: }L •• :•:SS : Y t r• • :S • •' ••3 1^ 1 i• •• • "' i • •"' i : {• I • • •••.• r • •: f • .. r•4G• - •: •• • fir•• vr:l';•• w 43 4 3 • '`,,iS :`::••• ••' r {• . { r : ; ' 'r.;: , i ' •'•:i :: R • • •i :: {.••MA .;S • ••' ) 1 ) , 3 4.ii : : • • • . • • rr •:•:• S :;• • •{.•. S•r •jf {• i •;:;::::f : •• ••• • •Srfrr r ;• • yl 1 1 Vr, r . j' +::t'r;r,.; r..• 71.1 s 11O « w t e • .•( a '•:•:: • • •• '' •;r • ':' frf:;': y:.1v. : .r.; {.• yr • .. . , .•.;' S7 - •: `r• ; ;•; •• S• • •'i :• :'{' • • • .. r r •• • •; :• .{:' SS :•::S N •' IIIA1 w (yY1 vc. 117 ! 3 7 r • ••: • :: .; '• '•:•:•:;:;:•.:•:. {:•'•'•: : •rr' r r :•'; .: S:•:•'•' Wi w .. 1 - ^• ;i . ;• ;.; :;. ':v :• •;•. •• : };:•••; ;y Si • ::5 { :•:: {• • •••''• '•• • • rrr{:;. •.• . 1 3 t 3 1D 1 f.;.: 3 4 39 38 ' w ( 13 r 4 g.X .... , , -6 42z) XvXoo.-oo-.%XXX-' <x. ov, S•: • . a - 4+ - 2 a W 1 1 14- . . . . ....... 1 :;:•S.••' ;•:•::. ::: ;.•.; S;. •.'•:1 r • ..:•' •• fir ' O gis 7 7 •::r..•:v.•:•:.• ::'.:•:•:;:;6:•: {•;•::':':' L1 (lit) .. r.. •) 2 JEs:'.•: ::• 3 In N 7 24 - 1.,llt S S AlS •:tom ••:•• f%.::''= • ':... ::•.•. a a . 1 Vol 5::;.•.:v. :•. R 21 0 20 J&J 16 1 c - 321 s /a,. a 194. ,a J t ass ! >, OLM oil 03 a' ( - ...' f, 5 - GO " ;221 14 ` ` 1 (7 do o) . 70,4. 7) 17 14 •)' 'y (Z) ' T SCHOOLSCHOOL DI s 1. ul u_Lz. A i w CN)IB NS 6ZZ 2A. 13 ^ :!•) (y (141ee) • I• (I OOe) (.,,we) SO bJ' S J O ISI 7 (/? ge + : ur I ^ Tb.fr 19 12 17 I w 1, '^ Torw L • 10.1',a1•0 ! lr.. -iS • J R1 • cl. S. ii , 1t .e. a '`!9) 1-3. 13 .11 = ' 1 » 1Pj, 91 s cr , 2, to (') S I (i) _ CO 1 a .t' too It IZ M.4 t 1 y to, If 22 9 <.., tQ I (7) T r` ^ , ••.r r g• 1 cw.J;^ (7 i 11. ae• J toy »s .:1„ •..1?'/ _...tli ... ` I'i i j * loe,s o - F ' r ,j Ss :•) 21 6 '!p /" 74) 1.00 a ! 24 7 J.L4 ` 2 ( S • - 1 a , ] sit l 1 . _" v 10 E Me11ne , f`- lss) r I.ttu— e ) ,. sT) '(s- .. v, M ,• • a t al 1 1 sat ff •Z.+ •'•o ' toz , + n 7 I r•tsi OS.bG t'S.1Sr S 4 c ai 3 + ' ... raa- Ili G al • 7J + 'sN ^ + Zi a 0s2S • 26 W' e . < "1 ;t•) o ° !onr1V - ( _ • (- a a s e._'L a e! is r .. + g: w. 1 _ _ a•) o , ,n m i •1 / ' , = d • ao r s '4.i) • I . ;y ( Q E•0 rtt e • 3 111 • O 1 e 1 i• (s (s2) ! y » fo e.I •L 4T w • (73) bhae O •O ; b ' 1)a t w t .p a &) I o1' OS 07 5 j .- ( r o p 1 Z Z— 4 3 2, —J . '\ u) C+, 1 . Its,* r. 1.'!2a< 4 100 145 i 7 co 211 7) 2 Imo \ a `/• / n7e P 2 2g Zlo •` .. Ctt /• tS1) .p r 1'a \ o` '1. ,\ Te 140•sJ Set. S =ec seec l •1 e .4d. .+. I 1 1 (,' (b 30 -3 ac .•/ 1rr 7. G•) A + d)s 1 !!.x O; n ,y ll) 1 - .L \ a 3 j) t j• eC ! + S) .07 %! T o ea0e2 J. l>t 20 1 1 eo4 t (SAO . O , 1 tiS•) - I( a) T f t. • ^, A T ' + 006 n • '4,• ' h7) Cam•) as) J cau -18.4 M --T — - - - . -- -- _ , _ 1, - ecsse, 1tt11ss79! al. sae er.) .. c, , :'f' - - -• •- ' . a o. p n O O C n ...Ifj'• ^ •, • t • y V [ , '•• .f,, ^^t1 wl. ' R V ESTE A • 11Oe.1p - n y r Q Y `\ V `•' 1 / O It 10 or.to I O ' • 8 I . 7 9 ' .I / Q C3 1 Df _ ' " t !k I C + V n "e C, • V 3+ JL_J , 4 3 I — — — } 3 75 1 3 L gr- a LINE/Z — y / L - ONO" 1 PROPERTY S AREAS 8 AND 9 11 xawl- 7 Act -i by C ouna i 1 J 0 uly 16, 1990 Endorsed.... MEMORANDUM Modified Red ected.w........, Date To: City Manager Michael McGuire From. Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins Subject: Request For Speed Reduction - Woodlynn Avenue From White Bear Avenue To McKnight Road On July 9, 1990, a letter and petition requesting the reduction of the speed limit from 40 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. on Woodlynn Avenue from White Bear Avenue to McKnight Road was presented. to the City Council. This request was tabled pending a review of the law to see if a traffic and speed study had to be done in order for this action to be taken. I have reviewed State Statute 169.14, Speed Restrictions, and it is my interpretation under Subd. 5b., Segments in Urban Districts, that the City Council, by resolution, may declare that section of Woodlynn to be an urban district and may establish on the segment the speed limit for urban districts prescribed in Subd. 2., which would enable them to reduce the speed limit from 40 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. I would recommend that this action be taken at the July 23, 1990, Council meeting upon confirmation by the Maplewood City Attorney. Attached is a copy of Minnesota Statute 169.14, Speed Restrictions, for review and confirmation, KVC:js Attachments r V 0' June 22, 1990 A^tion ty ,! • Chief Ken Collins City of Maplewood s _. 1 Dear Chief Collins; En; Mod''';: • Nej`.•.= • Enclosed is the petition by residents of Woodlyrn Avenue to reduce the speed limit frcxn 40 MPH to 30 MPH from White Bear Avenue. to McKnight Road. It is only lucky that there have been no major accidents on this: road. There have been many close calls. The fact that it is also an MI'C Bus Route contributes to the problem because the busses use the curb side lanes, where there are often pedestrians or cars entering or exiting. The Bus Stop in front of the Cottages surprises some speeding motorists because it is new and not well marked. Woodlynn Avenue has also become a major drag race street. At any time of the day, but particularly after 11:00 P.M., there are cars speeding in excess of the posted speeds. They can be heard for blocks around the Mall area. It almost seems like there is a circuit laid out for speeders, During discussions with neighbors about this issue another universal concern was mentioned many times. Because of two factors, turning into driveways has become hazardous - the speed limit and the four lanes. Even if a blinker is set the cars approaching from the rear do not slow down because they think that the turn will be made farther down the street. Several of the senior citizens in the Cottages also do not warn of turns early enough and their have been mane close calls. Man ofy the residents would like to see a two lane driving area with a turn lane/ pedestrian / Bus Stop lane at the curb side. Please consider this P along with the Speed Zone. Thank you very much. Charlotte Brooker 2172 Woodlyrn Avenue Speaking for the Residents A PETITION TO REDUCE THE SPEED LIMIT ON WOODLYNN AVENUE FROM WHITE BEAR AVENUE EAST TO MCKNIGHT ROAD Because of increased housing causing more cars to enter and exit onto Woodlynn Avenue, increased pedestrian traffic, young children living in housing along the Avenue, and late night drag racing/ squealing at bothgg ht Ariel and McKnight, the undersigned residents of Woodlynn Avenue request that the Maplewood Police Department decrease the speed from 40 MPH to 30 MPH. We also ask for further monitoring of traffic late at night since the road leads out of two bars and one pool hall which seem to generate traffic that speeds, revs engines, squeals to stops, and ag P peals out from intersections, thus ruining the quiet of the night, i 7'13& ;. 60e y a i; r L / 4 V% cat 1 r a , o 777 -gao 779- 177 7 - C, S7--:&3 4CI jk 11:7 T7a i449 777- 9d 37 169.129 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION 4076 Ai { Y conformity with it before the person's driver's license or driver's privilege. has been reinstated following its cancellation, suspension or revocation (1) because the person drove, operated, or was in physical control of motor vehicle while under the influence X of alcohol or a controlled substance or while the person had an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or more or (2) because the person refused to take a test which determines the presence of alcohol or a controlled substance when requested to do so by a proper. authority, is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. Jurisdiction over prosecutions under this 3.. section is in the county court. Histor • 1978 c 727 s 9; 1983 c 177 s 2; 1S11985 c. 4 s 7, 1986 c 444 169.13 RECKLESS OR CARELESS DRIVING.fFF A Subdivision 1. Reckless driving. Any person who drives any vehicle in such a manner as to indicate either a willful or a wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving and such reckless driving is a misdemeanor. r•. Subd. 2. Careless driving. Any person who operates or halts any vehicle upon any street or highway carelessly or heedlessly in disregard of the rights of others, or in a manner that endangers or is likely to endanger any property or any person, including j the driver or passengers of the vehicle, is guilty ofa misdemeanor. Subd. 3. Application. The provisions of this section apply, but arc not limited S.1 in application, to any person who drives any vehicle in the manner prohibited by this section: 1 upon the ice of any lake stream, or river, including but not limited to the ice' A; of any boundary water; or 2) in a parking lot ordinarily used by or available to the public though not as a matter of right, and a driveway connecting such a parking lot with a street or highway. History: (2720 -177) 1937 c 464 s 27; 1939 c 430 s 5; 1947 c 428 s 11; 1967 c 569 s s- 2, Ex1971 c 27 s 7, 1983 c 236 s 1; 1984 c 622 s 15 M1 -: n 169.131 [Repealed, 1976 c 103 s 1] 169,132 [Repealed, 1977 c 347 s 291 169.14 SPEED RES1"'RIC171ONS. r Subdivision 1. Basic rule. No person shall drive it vehicle on it highway at a speed H t}•.greater than is reasonable and prudent. under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every event speed shall be so restricted as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle or other conveyance on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care. Subd. 2. Speed limits, Where no special hazard exists the following speeds shall be lawful, but any speeds in excess of such limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that the speed limit within any municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful: 1) 30 miles per hour in an urban district; 2) 65 miles per hour in other locations during the daytime; 3) 55 miles per hour in such other locations during the nighttime; 4) ten miles per hour in alleys. Daytime" means from a half hour before sunrise to a half hour after sunset, except at any time when due to weather or other conditions there is not sufficient light to pvr t s • and r r • . Feet. f1 render clearly discernible persons and vehicles at a distance of' 500 feet. Nighttime means at any other hour or at any time when due to weather or other conditions there is light discernible at a distance ofnotsufficienttorenderclearlypersonsandvehicles 500 feet. Subd. 3. Reduced speed required. The driver of any vehicle shall, consistent with v C 4077 IJIGIIWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION 169.14 the requirements, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and cross- ing an intersection or railway grade crossing, when approaching and going around a curve, when approaching a hill crest, when traveling upon any narrow or winding roadway, and when special hazards exist with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions. Subd 4 . 1• stal)lisliin Of zoIles l)y coiililiissiolie 011 determining upon tile basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that any speed set forthh in this section is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under the conditions fouled to exist oil any trunk highway or upon any par thereof, the commissioner may erect appropriate signs designating a reasonable and safe speed limit thereat, which speed limit shall be effective when such signs are erected. Any speeds. in excess of such linlits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is riot reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that any speed limit within any municipality snail be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful. Can determining upon that basis tiht-It a part of the trunk highway system outside a municipality should be a zone of maxirlhum speed limit, the commissioner may establish that part as such a zone by erecting appropriate signs showing the beginning and end of the zone, designating a reasonable and safe speed therefor, which may be dif crent than the speed set forth in this section, and that it is a zone of maximum speed limit. Tile speed so designated by the commissioner within any such zone shall be a maximum speed limit, and speed in excess of such lirllit shall be unlawful. The commissioner may in the same manner from time to time alter the boundary of such a zone and the speed limit therein or eliminate such zone. Subd. 5. Zoning within local areas. When local authorities believe that the existing speed limit upon any street or highway or part thereof, within their respective jurisdictions and not a part of tile trunk highway system is greater or less than is reasonable or safe under existing conditions, they may request the commissioner to authorize, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, the erection of appropriate signs designating what speed is reasonable and safe, and the commis may authorize the erection of appropriate signs a reasonable and safe speed limit thereat, which speed limit shall be effective when such signs are erected. Any speeds in excess of these speed limits shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful; except that any speed limit within ally municipality shall be a maximum limit and any speed in excess thereof shall be unlawful Alteration of speed limits oil streets and highways slhall be made only upon authority of the commissioner except as provided in subdivision 5a. Subd. 5a. Speed zoni in school zones. Local authorities may e a school speed limit within a school zone of a public, or nonpublic school upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation as prescribed by the commissioner of transporta- tion. The establishment of a school speed limit on any trunk highway shall be with the consent of the commissioner of' transportation. Such school speed limits shall be in effect when children are present, going to or leaving school during opening, or closing hours or during school recess periods. "rile school speed limit shall riot be lower than 15 miles per flour and slhall not be ihhore titan 20 miles per (hour below the established speed limit on an affected street or highway if the established speed limit is 40 miles per !lour or greater. The school speed limit shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the reduced speed zone Any speed in excess of such posted school speed limit is unlawful. All such signs shall be erected by tile. local authorities on those streets aihd !highways lender their respective jurisdictions and by the commissioner of transportation on trunk }highways. For the purpose of this subdivision, "school zone" nheans that section of a street or highway which abuts the grounds of a school where children have access to the street or highway from the school property or where an established school crossing is located provided the school advance sign prescribed by the manual on uniform traffic control devices adopted by the commissioner of transportation pursuant to section 169.06 is in place. All signs erected by local authorities to designate speed limits in school zones shall conform to the manual on uniform control devices. 4• A n 7: .t s r l is v. 1 1 4078z169.14 HIGHWAY TRAFFIC REGULATION Subd. 5b. Segments in urban districts. When any segment of at least a quarter - mile in distance of any city street, municipal state aid street or town road on which a speed limit in excess of 30 miles per hour has been established pursuant to an engineering and traffic investigation by the commissioner meets the definition of' urban district" as defined in section 169.01, subdivision 59, the governing body of the city or town may by resolution declare the segment to be an urban district and may r establish on the segment the speed limit for urban districts prescribed in subdivision 2. The -speed limit so established shall be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit is established, and any speed in .excess of such posted limits shall be unlawful. A copy of the resolution shall be transmitted to the commissioner at least ten days prior to the erection of the signs. Subd. 5c. Speed zoning in alleyways. Local authorities may regulate speed limits for alleyways as defined in section 169.01 based on their own engineering and traffic t investigations. Alleyway speed limits established at other than ten miles per hours al be effective when proper signs are posted. Subd. 5d. Speed zoning in work zones. The commissioner, on trunk highways and temporary trunk highways, and local authorities, on streets and highways under their jurisdiction, may authorize the use of reduced maximum speed limits in highway work zones. The commissioner or local authority is.not required to conduct an engineering and traffic investigation before authorizing a reduced speed limit in a highway work y zone. The minimum highway work zone speed limit is 20 miles per hour. The work zone speed limit must not reduce the established speed limit on the affected street or highway by more than 15 milks per hour, except that the highway work zone, speed limit shall not exceed 40 miles per hour. Highway work zone speed limits are effective on erection of appropriate regulatory speed limit signs designating the beginning and end of the x affected work zone. The signs must he removed or covered when they are not i•equii•ec1. A speed greater than the posted highway work zone speed limit is unlawful. For purposes of this subdivision, "Highway work zone" means a segment of n highway or street where a road authority or its agent is constructing, reconstructing, or maintaining the physical structure of the roadway, its shoulders, or features adjacent F 'to the roadway, including underground and overhead utilities and highway appurte- nances. Subd. 6. [Repealed, Ex 1971 c 27 s 491 Subd. 7. Burden of proof. The provisions of this chapter declaring speedf limitation shall not be construed to relieve the plaintiff in any civil action from the burden of proving negligence on the part of the defendant as the proximate cause of an accident. Subd. 8. Minimum speeds. On determining upon the basis of an engineering and F traffic investigation that a speed at least as great as, or in excess of' a specified and determined minimum is necessary to the reasonable and safe use of any trunk highway o fying the mini -r onion thereof, the commissioner may erect appropriate signs specipy mum speed on such highway or portion thereof. The minimum speed shall be effective when such signs are erected. Any speeds less than the posted minimum speeds shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful. r'^Subd. 9. Standards of evidence. In any prosecution in which the rate of speed 7 of a motor vehicle is relevant, evidence of the speed of a motor vehicle as indicated on the speedometer thereof shall be admissible on a showing that a vehicle is regularly used in traffic law enforcement and that the speedometer thereon is regularly and routinely tested for accuracy and a record of the results of said tests kept on file by the agency f-having control of said vehicle. Evidence as to the speed indicated on said speedometer shall be prima facie evidence that the said vehicle was, at the time said reading was observed, traveling at the rate of speed so indicated; subject to correction by the amount of error, if any, shown to exist by the test made closest in time to the time of said reading. r. FAM July 16, 1990 Acti on by Cou.ncil v MEMORANDUM Endorsed„ Modified- To: City Manager Michael McGuire Rejeoted - 0 - ,, ,,......... From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. ate Subject: CollinsCollnsct : Cond i t i ons For Kennel Permit - 388 •E. Viking Drive On July 13, 1990 I requested that Midwestst Animal Services check 388 E. VikingftheconditionssetbytheCityCouncil Drive to see had been met. i1 for the kennel permit Animal Control Officer Ruzicka reported •p ed that. 1. No top had been placed on the kennelnnel as directed bytheCityCouncil. 2. The dogs were not confined to the upper property areaasdirectedbytheCityCouncil, and no one was attheresidence. 3. No feces or odor problem was located on the property. 4. Three dogs were located on the Falk property (tworottweilersandoneGermanshepherd). It should benotedthatMarkA. Sackett, 380 E. VikingadvisedsedAn Drive,Animal Control Officer Ruzicka that he wthenewowneroftheGermans as h a c ecrevealedthatthedogiscurrentllicens ' name,y ed n hhis Upon further examination, the Animal C •Control Officer found that Mr. SacketthadbuiltakennelanddoghouseonhisroertppyfortheGermanshepherd. No one was able to explain how the G •Germ shepherd wound up n the back andoftheFalkresidence, 388 E. Viking rive. yg With the sale of the German shepherd,do s City .the Falk 's currently only ave twgandarenotrequiredbyC ordi y o adultycetohaveakennelpermit. This situation will be monitored periodically by Midwest Animal Services,any further developments will be relayed to the City Council, and y KVC: js cc Rick Ruzicka, Midwest Animal Serviceses q AGENDA REPORT TO: Ma and Cit Council FROM: Cit Mana RE •* CO CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS DATE: Jul 17, 1990 INTRODUCTI At its June 11, 1990 meetin the Cit Council authorized the creation, of a nine member Communit Center Advisor Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to obtain communit input re the need and desire to Construct a communit center a,and if so-,. recommendin potential uses and facilities to be housed in the proposed buildin BACKGROUND Th Committee will be composed of six Maplewood residents who represent the different a and lifest in the Cit the Cit Mana the Director of Parks and Recreation, and a member of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Articles were published in the local newspapers,, Maplewood in Motion, and Channel 64 re that interested people appl to serve on the Committee. Residents Numerous applications were received,, and the followin residents are recommended for appointment to the Committee. Mr. Thomas Ginzl 2441 Nemitz Mr. Marvin Mahte 2095 Prosperit Ave, Mr. James G. Malle 1722 McKni Lane Mg. Lori Tauer 467 Sterlin Street South I Mr. Donald Wie 2119 Duluth Place The sixth Committee member is to be a 3M employ who resides within the City. We are currently speaking with 3M's CommunityAffairsdepartmenttofindanappropriatecandidate. Park and Recreation Commissioner At its meeting on Monday, July 1+6, 1990, the Park and Recreation Commission did not appoint their representative to serve on this Committee. However, the Commission will be making its appointment in the next several weeks. The two candidates are Mavis Hawkins and Jeanne Ewald. We are hoping to begin the Committee's task in mid -Au g upt. RECOM14ENDATION It is hereby recommended that the City Council appoint Mr. Thomas Ginzl, Mr, Marvin Mahre, Mr. James Malley, Ms+ Lori Tauer, Mr. Don Weigert, a sixth resident who will represent 3M, and a Parks and recreation Commissioner to serve on the Community Center Advisory Committee If- ? AGENDA REPORT' TO: Ma and Cit Council IM014: Cit Mana RE: COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOI14THENTS DATE: Jul 17, 1990 The information for this a report will be available at yourpre-a meetin on Thursda Jul 19, 19900 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council * . E x d o r s e d , . ... , .. , , , ... , , . , TO: City Manager Modif i e FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Re Dat e SUBJECT: Brooks Avenue Water Main, Project 88 -08 -- Change order Two DATE July 16, 1990 Introduction Proposed Change order T.WO in the amount of $663.20 is attached. A resolution to authorize the change order is attached. Background The majority of this change order is for the extension of an informal bituminous curb across the driveway of 1561 Brooks Avenue East. The property owner asserts that there was previously a very small, but functional li p of bituminous at the edge of her driveway that keep street drainage out of her property. She asserts that drainage now runs from the street down her driveway and toward her house. The previous existence of the lip of bituminous is disputed. However in. the interest of settling the matter, proposed placement of an informal bituminous curb was agreed on. The second item involves restoration of turf disturbed by removal of a dead tree at 1561 Brooks Avenue.East qwithintheacquired right -of -way. Additional time and restoration costs were also for repair of tire tracks left in the boulevard that are not the responsibility of the contractor. Recommendation It is recommended that Change Order Two be approved BAI ic Attachments J cl ever Contracting Inc. 13145 Vassal- 5t. Fore .st Lake, MiN 5UES TO : C i t y of Mao I ewwd 1830 E. County Road U mazlewo d, 1X1 55103 RIE: Brooks Uaterniain 88-08IEXTFA WORK DATE » June 28, 19 f• ifiE E• '•E•iEiEE--f-f••1E••lf I-E-IE•lE•1f if •fif•1l f f•f•f•If-iE •iEaEf f-E -if-lE •3ff •iE f-lE-lf •IE•if-E••E •••jf•f E•aEf if •- ••f E•lE- •if f •!E#-E•lE •cif •-iff •iF DESCRIPTION QUANT ITY UNITS LNIT PRICE TO IE• 3tflIf• tEE. •ifff•lf•ff•aFiif•f- X•IEfE•il`-lf-I(-f E- f• if- lE• E• lf-#- Jff• E- f• E- iE-E- iE- IE• E- E• f!- f- E- - t• lE• iE• - I• IfE- E- E- t- i• f- 3E• 3ff -!E••f•IEE•1f•-X-•E•JE Pet letter to s•epl curb L, F. f. G r Seed area %he' t dead ells wa-a reiS17 ved and 2Q, Q i Ied z n anti seeded where car t t•vv on b I Yt .Leeee Lumalsged W.c`. s a+..( - rw. r.•+---- wrr r. err. r. r. rrr.... rrr. ww.... rw+. r.. ..... r..w ---- -r-r w. ------«..•..... wr•r.-.. r-r -.« ---r,..w.+......•.w.rr i a.. r..• r .rrr....w.....w.r•...r.w i CHANGE ORDER TWO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MAPLEWOOD,MINNESOTA Project Name: ..Brooks Avenue Water.Main Change Order No Two Project No.: 88 -08 Date:July 5, 1990 Contractor: Meyer Contracting,Inc. The following changes shall be made in the contract.documents: Unit Description Unit Quantity Price Total Bit. Surmountable Curb L.F.60 6,72 403.20 Grade, Topsoil & Seed HR.8 30.00 240.00 Repair Sod in Blvd. L.S.1 20000 20.00 Contract Status Time Cost original Contract:31,996*52 Net Change of Prior Change Order No. I to No. :1 Change This Change order:663.20 Revised Contract:33,834.72 Approved Mayor Approved Engineer Agreed to by Contractor by Its Title 1 RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION. OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 88 -08 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota.. Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 88 -08 Change Order Two. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order Two in the amount of $663.20. The project budget is amended to $48,,500. The ro'ect fin P 7 financing is amended as follows. Existing Proposed Assessments .$44,974003 $44,974.03 Hydrant.Fund X21659.91 _ 3,525.97 47,633*94 $48,500.00 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council:. TO: City Manager Endorsed....,..,.. FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Re jecte DateSUBJECT.: - Condor o 1-St rm Sewer, Western... Branch, Project 86- 01-- -- pprove Plans DATE: July 17 , 1990 Introduction The subject plans are presented for approval. A resolution is at- tached.to approve the plans and authorize advertising for bids. Background During the design of this project, it was found that the energy di structure on the 30 -inch diameter inlet on the south side of the Londin- Dorland pond is severely undermined. It is proposed to repair the foundation for this structure as part of this project. If the foundation for the energy dissipator is not secured, then it will eventually shear off from the pipe and settle into the pond. Exten- sive scouring would then occur. The size and limited accessibility of the structure make the major maintenance involved more reasonably done by the storm sewer contractor rather than city forces. It is also proposed to fence the Londin - Dorland pond. This was not part of the feasibility report since the.pond has three horizontal to one vertical side slopes in conformance with the city's informal policy on pond design. However, the long slope on the south side going directly into the pond may be very attractive to children for sledding or other activities. It may not be possible. for children to stop prior to hitting open water or partially frozen water. It is proposed to use a vinyl- -clad, five -foot high chain -link fence to enclose the pond. A formal policy on pond safety is currently being developed. The current 3:1 side slope standard is tentatively seen to be too steep without fencing. This is particularly true on long slopes. A revi- sion to 4:1 or 6:1 where no fence is installed is to be proposed as part of the policy. It is not possible for the Londin- Dorland pond to meet such a criteria. Recommendation It.is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. BAI j c Attachment RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to.. resolution passed by the city council on Apri.1. 23 .19 9 0 , plans and. specifications for Condor. Storm Sewer , Western Branch,, Project 86-01, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the city engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 10 Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file .in the office of the city clerk. 20 The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and consid- ered by the council at 10 a.m., on the 24th day of August, 1990, at the city hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed. with the clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable. to the City of Maplewood. Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3.0 The city clerk and city engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids .received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The council will consider the bids, and the. award of a contract, at the regular city council meeting of August 27, 1990. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT od tion by Counoil;, TO.:. City Manager Endorsed, N -M ... ... ..,.g Modifi ed,..-., FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce .Irish Rej - Dat SUBJECT: White Bear Avenue, Larpenteur to .Frost , Project 8 9--12 -- Approve Plans DATE: July 17, 1990 Introduction Ramsey County staff have prepared plans for reconstruction of White Bear Avenue (CSAH 65) from Larpenteur to Frost. These plans are presented for approval so that Ramsey County may proceed to acquire necessary easements. Background The scope of the White Bear Avenue reconstruction is entirely new concrete pavement widened.to accommodate a center turn lane. The existing sanitary sewer and services should be replaced in its entirety. The right- of- way.plan includes easements necessary for utility reconstruction. It is planned to present a feasibility reportort to the council within a month. Approval of the roadway and rl. ght -of -way plans at this point does not commit the city to the project. Ramsey County will acquire all required easements and right-of-way,Y Recommendation It is.recommended that the council adopt the attached resolution to approve the roadway and right -of -way plans. BAI RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Project No, S.A.P. 62- 665 -35 showing.proposed alignment, profiles, grades, temporary andPY permanent easements for the acquisition of right of way on CountyStateAidHighwayNo. 65 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the Cit Y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in al,l things approved. Dated this day of 19900 i r CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Maplewood i - I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and Correct copy of. a resolution presented to and adopted b the CityYCouncilofMaplewoodatameetingthereofheldintheCityof Maplewood, Minnesota, on the dayof1990, as disclosed by the records of said i City in my possession. Seal) AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Couneilz Endorsed.-_TO: City Manager Modifie FROM : A ReJ ectet.....,,......Assistant City Engineer Bruce-Irish Dat e SUBJECT: County Road Cr White-B jectiteBearAvenuetoAriel, Pro 86-2 Schedule. Assessment Hearin DATE: July 17 1990 Introduction It is requested that an assessment hearing be scheduled for thesubjectproject . Background Two proposed assessment rollslls are presented, The first proposedassessmentrollisbasedonthepreliminary P P sed presented at the P urinary assessment rollpublichearing. City assessment oli 'changed significantly since the p ties have project was ordered. The .second assessment roll11 is based on current assessmentPolicies- Specifically, assessment •for sidewalk is deleted, andresidentialpropertiesareassessedatunitratesof $1,125 and500forstreetandstormsewer, respectively. These changescausetheassessmentcostrecovertore801531.33. Y duce to $60,884.76 from The final costs of the .project have not yet been presented to tci budget by Ramsey Count Therefore, he a Y re, the Impact on the project ,g t is not ascerta The city p al state Y previously applied for useOfitsmunicipalaidfundsthroughanoff - s stem tronthisproject . .These funds ma b Y ansf er Y e used to supplement theassessmentrecoverytofinancetheprojectcosts. Recommendation It is recommended that the council determine whether to useassessmentrollaspresentedatthepublic the assess p lic hearing or the revisedassessmentbasedoncurrentassessmentolio' ed hearing should then be scheduled, P ies. An assessment BAI jC Attachments 31Z•42 we m of to it of to 19 11 40 J I7.ye3h ) el (49 ••• r :. 2 0 c (13) 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 040 3J `c z _ 4.1 4 8) h 7 ., n .. . cw, 0 o r o r 4 pill;c 5 '.• p . 33 J64 . 5 •.s - 3 v. 5 OAK A Y E. s Ln • ss 13 It32ocop1002,7 7 cu.., o¢ Z o4 C) I5 14 13 TZ11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 c cv . 2 7a, o 17 2 16 17 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0 t 1 4r 8 301 04 r - EDGEHILL. ROADd t8 0 c, +•1jr tit +! /• 17r' 3 3 I or 4 Na •' :. .: h t , -1' w Z 15 14 13 12 II 10 9 05t Jr , 8? 5 4 3 2 1 , vA c•c.•7a— _. t?oc_ 20G2543 -M w_ 20 2 t 23 24 2 6 27282930 W 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23'24 25 6 27 28 29 0Vol L-17 34,744 N t ;. : .••. s 1G. •. •.. K r . {'t VAGATED AVE 4 1 _ _ Doc 2062543 t t t Z'o -- - a •- w_ i f'd' 30 30 3 v , 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 N a1151718192021222324252627282930v 1 30 4 0 I p t F nFn N - - -- _ ,T _._ wm i _ i ._r i w. w• COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENT 86--25 PROPOSED ASSESSEMENT AREA SCALE N/A O NI COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENT 86 -25 PROPOSED ASSESSEMENT AREA SCALE N/A III cc 70.79 a O 2, oto 0 in p O 4 53 ac ,. 'c 020 4G _19 -71 S °SO N 57 1.53 ac. dp s 7 w 3) 030 60 60 r040 S?N 49 399 40 ac . o C1,c• } U30 J Uj a o z.92 ac.tw i 4 440 m a w 020 6 2 opt 212 .2 5' """'_ 43. V 20O n m \ 19 17-41D 00) 2 m 8.52l3 .2 b ,c6 io 0 ec. T 3 '43 ac .8 c to 0 N i • us .Ill 5d. I h 10 a5SO X054J6* 4 o INDEPENDENT SCHOOL qc D I S T. 622 o. b 3. u 030 21 'q .'• ICY) 100'I M 4 9. S 'M Jon 7 n . e QQ E- 2g- -EE -34 COUNTY ROAD C IMPROVEMENT 86 -25 PROPOSED ASSESSEMENT AREA SCALE N/A III r - PROJECT M. 86 -25 COUNTY ROAD C WDA /EAST COL. 4 748.20 200,0 0,00 0 00 948,20 RAGE 1 OF 1 07 -10 --1990 COL 5 748.20 200,00 359,50 90 100, 00 118.00 1609,70 QUANT I TY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = SAN SEWER SERVICE - EA COL. E ) _ WATER SERVICE EA COL. 31 -= STORM SEWER -SF COL N 4) SIDEWALK FF COL. 5 a STREETS -- FF PIN NOW COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 02-- 29- -22 -34 -0009 0. 00 71 500m 0o 02-29-22-34.1 1.00 40000.00 11 --29 22 -L 1 --0012 01-00 00 00 0000 1 -29-- 22--21-- 001 s O.Ot 00 0, 0 11-- 29- -22.- -21 --0044 1 r 00 1 i 00 t. fit 11- -29- 2---21--004. 9 1100 o. 00 GRAND TI..FT!'7LS 3 3.00 111 X00.00 COL. 4 748.20 200,0 0,00 0 00 948,20 RAGE 1 OF 1 07 -10 --1990 COL 5 748.20 200,00 359,50 90 100, 00 118.00 1609,70 PAGE 1 OF 1 DP No. 07 — -190 PROJECT NO. 86 -25 COUNTY ROAD C WDA /FAST PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- 02- -T29— R-- 22- -00 -34 2 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE a - 1. EA AT 232.320 EA.232. DATER SERVICE i . 000 EA AT EA. _ STORM SEWER 111 SF AT 1$0.073 EA. =s 139.50 SIDEWALK 948.200 FF AT 7.320 EA. =6,940&8282 STREETS 948.FF AT 36&500 EA. =34,6091, 30 SEC 11— T- - 29— R- -22- -00 -21 r rw..wrr..wrw urr___r_wr__ 4 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM mow. QUANTITY rrr ......r...w._w_wr.....w.. PER RATE r._w__r_ ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE 2.000 EA AT 232.320 EA.464,64 WATER SERVICE 2.000 EA AT 2 EA.4 00STORMSEWER .0&000 SF AT E. 073 EA. _so. 00 SIDEWALK fit. 000 FF AT 7.320 EA. =so. oo STREETS 661.500 FF AT 36.EA.24 s 144. 75 GRAND TOTALS 6 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE 3.000 EA AT 232.320 EA. _696 . 96 WATER SERVICE 3. X00 EA AT 2 = 000.0044 EA. STORM SEWER 1 i 1 s 500.000 SF AT 073 EA. =08, 39.0 50SIDEWALK948.200 FF AT 7.320 EA. =X6, 940.82STREETS1s603.700 FF AT 36.500 EA. =58, 05 TOTAL'AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = 9 80, 33 D/P NOR ? ? ?? ITEM SAN SEWER SERVICE DATER SERVICE STORM SEWER SIDEWALK STREETS TOTAL ASSESSMENT SAKI SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER SIDEWALK STREETS TOTAL ASSESSMENT = SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER SIDEWALK STREETS TOTAL ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEDER SIDEWALK STREETS TOTAL ASSESSMENT =- SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER SIDEWALK STREETS TOTAL ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER SIDEWALK STREETS PAGE 1 OF 2 PROJECT ND, 86 --25. COUNTY ROAD . 0 WBA /EAST ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT w•rr_wrrwrw - - r ..rr.wwr__w 02-29-22-34-0009 11-- 29- 22 -21- -0044 EA AT 232. 320 EA.00 0.000 EA AT 2, Oft. 000 EA. =0.00 71, 500.000 .SF AT 0.073 EA. =5, 219.50 748.200 FF AT EAR =5, 476. 82 748.200 FF AT 36.500 EA.27, 309. 30 381 005. 62 0229- 22- -34- -0010 1. (EA AT 232, 320 EA. =232,32 000 FA AT 2, 000.000 EA. =2 000. 00 40 SF AT 0, 073 EA. =2, 9.20. 00 200w000 FF AT 7.320 EA. =1 00 112.000 FF AT 36.500 EA. =7, 300.00 13 32 11- 29 -22- 21--0012 EA AT 232, 320 EA. EA AT 2, 000-000 EA. =0. 00 SE AT 0,078 EAR --Ow Oct 0.000 FF AT 7.EA. =0.00 359.FF AT 36.500 EA* =13 75 13 11- 29-22- -21--0013 ww EA AT 232.320 EA. = w _ w ww _ •.wr w__ w 0.00 0.000 EA AT 2,000-000 EA.0. 00 0.000 SF AT 0.073 EA. —0.00 0,000 FF AT 7.320 EA. =0.00 90.000 FF AT 36.500 EA. =3,285, 00 3, 285 . 00 11-- 29- 22 -21- -0044 EA AT 232.EA. =232. 32 EA AT 2, 000,000 EA.2, 000. 00 SF AT 0.073 EA. w 0.00 . FF AT 7,320 EA. =0. 00 FF AT 36,500 EA. -31650. 650. 00 5, 32 11- 29--22 -21 -0045 EA AT 232, 320 EA. =232. 32 000 EA AT 2, 000.000 EA. =2, 000. 00 SF AT 0,073 EA. =0.00 FF AT 7,320 EA. =Or 00 112.000 FF AT 36.500 EA. =4.088. PAGE 2 OF 2 07 -10- -1'990 PROJECT NO. .86 -25.COUNTY ROAD C WBA /EAST D/P NOw ASSESSMENT ROLL I TES .QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT 6 PARCELS ASSESSED GRAND TOTALS SAN SEWER SERVICE EA AT 232o320 EA,696.96 WATER SERVICE 31000 EA AT 2,EA.6, 000.00 STORM SEWER 111, 500.. 00+SF AT 0.073 EA. =8, 50 SIDEWALK 948.200 FF AT 7.320 FAQ. =S, 940.82 STREETS 1, 609.700 FF AT 36.500 EA. _58, 754.05 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT =80, 33 PR# CT M! 86-25 COLKN ROAD C M r PPA3E 1 OF 1 R- 10-1998 DIP ! 7777 Qt. ITY CHECK LIST COQ.. 1 } = SEWER SERVICE - FA COL. '} = WATER SERVICE - EA COL. 3} = STORN SEWER (C!) - SF CM, 4). =' STORK SEWER ORES} - UNIT COL. 5} = STREETS (CUM) - FF COLS 6} STREETS (RES) - UNIT PIN ML COL 1 COL 2 COL 3 COL 4 Ca. S CO. 6 2 3-C - 34 -85 . 7158.Q. OS 748.20 02- '9 - -34 -010 1.00 1100 0.00 21 00 11- 29- -2C -21 -001 E 8.OR @, Odd 0.00 0100 359. N f 1 I - 29 -22 -21 -0013 0, 04 i. N 0. Q Q 0 0. 1. Qt0 11 -29- 22-21 -0044 1.00 1. go @. 00 0.00 6106 1.00 11-29-22-21-0045 1.4f 00 0. BO 0.00 1. GRAD TOTALS 3000 3. 00 71500,9 00 2.1107.20 5, N I PAGE 1 OF i D/P NO. ? ? ? ? PROJECT NO. 86-25 COUNTY ROAD . C (B rev) PROJECT SUMMARY SEC- -02--T--29-- R--22- 00--34 2 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE r rrwrrwrw_rr.r ..r..wr.w__r.w... .rw r w_.w ...... SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEWER ( STREETS (COMM) STREETS (RES) SEC-11-`T-29—R-22-00-21 4 PARCELS ASSESSED I TEI++'1 QUANTITY PER SAN SEWER SERVICE EA 1,000 EA 71,SF 2,000 UNIT 7413 FF 2.000 UNIT SEC-11-`T-29—R-22-00-21 4 PARCELS ASSESSED I TEI++'1 QUANTITY PER SAN SEWER SERVICE 2 000 WATER SERVICE 2.000 L.STORM . SEWER ( EAR = STORM SEDER (RES) 0,100 STREET (COMM)359,000 STREETS (RES)3.000 GRAND . TOTALS 6 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY SAN SEWER SERVICE EAR WATER SERVICE 3.600 STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEWER (RES) STREETS (COMM)1, 107.200 STREETS (RES) EA EA SF UNIT FF' UNIT PER EA EA SF UNIT FF UNIT AT M 232,320 EA, AT 25 000 000 EAR = AT 0,100 EA. _ AT 500.000 EAr AT 36.500 EA. AT 1,125.0 00 EAR AT RATE wr.wwwrrw AT 232.320 EAR = AT 2,000,000 EA, AT 0r 100 EAR = AT 500,000 EAR AT 36m500 EAr AT 1 EA* = 07- 10 -1SS0 ASSESSMENT r 32 1 000 00 7 150.00 11000.00 2, 250 , 00 ASSESSMENT 464.64 4, 00 0 00 0 00 13, 50 3, 00 ASSESSMENT 656.96 64 00 7, 150.00 1,, 000.00 40, 412, 80 5, 625.00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT ***$ 60,1884a 76 RATE AT 232. EA. _ AT 2, 000.000 EA. _ AT 0.100 EAR = AT 500.000 EA, = AT 36.500 EA. = AT 1,EA. = 07- 10 -1SS0 ASSESSMENT r 32 1 000 00 7 150.00 11000.00 2, 250 , 00 ASSESSMENT 464.64 4, 00 0 00 0 00 13, 50 3, 00 ASSESSMENT 656.96 64 00 7, 150.00 1,, 000.00 40, 412, 80 5, 625.00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT ***$ 60,1884a 76 D/P NO. ? ? ?? ITEM SAN SEWER SERVICE GRATER SERVICE STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEWER (RES) STREETS (COMM) STREETS ( RES) TOTAL ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEDER ( RES) STREETS (COMM) STREETS ( RES) TOTAL .ASSESSMENT SAN-SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEWER (RES) STREETS (COMM) STREETS (RES) TOTAL ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEWER (RES) STREETS (COMM) STREETS (RES) TOTAL ASSESSMENT SAN SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER (COMM) STORM SEWER ( RES) STREETS (COMM) STREETS ( RES) TOTAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 86-25 COUNTY ROAD C (B rev) ASSESSMENT ROLL QUANTITY PER RATE 000 EA AT EA. 000 EA AT 2, 000. 00 EA. 01000 SF AT 04R 100 EA. 2. UNIT AT 500-000 EA. 748.FF AT 36.500 EAR 000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA. = 1,000 EA AT 2 EA. = 1 EA AT 2,000,000 EA. = 01000 SF AT 0.100 EA. =- 2.UNIT AT 500wOOO EA. UNIT FF AT 36.500 EA. 21-000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA. 0.000 0.000 000 0.000 EA AT 232,320 EA. EA AT 2, 000.EA. = SF AT 0,100 EA. = UNIT AT 500.000 EA. FF AT 36.500 EA. = UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA. 0.001 EA AT 232.321 EA. 0.000 EA AT 2,000-000 EA. - 0.000 SF AT 0.10171 EA. -= 01000 UNIT AT 500,000 EA. = 0.000 FF AT 500 EA. 1.000 UNIT AT 1,125,000 EA. = PACE 1 OF 2 07 -10 -1990 ASSESSMENT 02- 29- 22--34 -0009 0, 00 7,150. 00 0.00 27 0100 34 13"o 02-- 29-- 22--34 -0010 rwww c . .r 2, 001. 00 0.01 s1, o00. 00 Ol 00 2 00 5 11 r r.r .wr_ rwrr..w rr O -00 0. 00 0,00 0r00 13 0.00 11- -29- 22- 21- -0013 0.00 0, 0171 0.00 1 00 1 . 00 11- 29--22- -21 -0044 2 32. 32 2, 010.00 00 0. 00 0,00 1 00 3,357.32 EA AT 232-320 EA. = EA AT 2, 000,000 EA. 0.000 SF AT 0.100 EA. w 0. 000 UNIT AT 500,000 EA. 0,000 FF AT EA. = 1,000 UNIT AT 1,125.000 EA, PACE 1 OF 2 07 -10 -1990 ASSESSMENT 02- 29- 22--34 -0009 0, 00 7,150. 00 0.00 27 0100 34 13"o 02-- 29-- 22--34 -0010 rwww c . .r 2, 001. 00 0.01 s1, o00. 00 Ol 00 2 00 5 11 r r.r .wr_ rwrr..w rr O -00 0. 00 0,00 0r00 13 0.00 11- -29- 22- 21- -0013 0.00 0, 0171 0.00 1 00 1 . 00 11- 29--22- -21 -0044 2 32. 32 2, 010.00 00 0. 00 0,00 1 00 3,357.32 PAGE 2 OF 2 07 -10 -1990 PROJECT NO, 86--25 COUNTY ROAD C (B r*ev) DIP NO& ? ? ?? ASSESSMENT ROLL ITEMt QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT wrr Ywwr rfw.r war 1Mwrrwr rwO - r.w r rw ww wrrw 11- 29- - 22 - 21- -0045 SAN SEWER SERVICE EA AT 232.EA. =232.3 DATER SERVICE 000 EA AT 2,000-000 EA. =2, 0. 00. STORM SEDER (COMM)SF AT 0.100 EA. =0, 00 STORM SEWER (RES)UNIT AT 500.000 EA. STREETS (COMM)FF AT 36.500 EA. =0.00 STREETS I RES T X00 UNIT AT 1,125.000 EA. -1, 125.00 TOTAL. ASSESSMENT =3,357,32 6 PARCELS. ASSESSED GRAND TOTALS SAN . SEWER SERVICE EA AT 232.320 EA. =696.96 WATER SERVICE 3.000 EA AT EA. =-Sl 000.00 STORM SEDER (COMM)SF AT 0,100 EA. =7, 00 STORK SEWER. (RES)UNIT AT 5@0w@00 EA. =sl 000.00 STREETS (COMM)1.07a 200 FF AT 36.500 EA. STREETS { RES }5.000 UNIT AT 1, 000 EA. _5. 00 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT =601884a,76 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the costs for the improvement of County Road C from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street, City Project 86 -25 are complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE. BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against.every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. RESOLUTION ORDERING.ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of County Road C.from White Bear. Avenue. to Ariel Street, City Project 86 -25 and the said assessment is.on file in the office of . the city clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 10 A hearing shall.be held on 27,th day of August, 1990, at the city hall at 7 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all . persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 24P The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the.hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said a.ssessment . 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by council EndTOCityManageroset,,..»r..., Modified FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish eat., Date SUBJECT: Gervals Avenue, Project 88 -14 -- Schedule Assessment Hearing DATE:. July 16, 1990 Introduction A preliminary assessment roll and request to set an assessment hearing for the subject project is attached. Background The assessment rate of $36.50 per front foot is the rate presented at the public hearing. Recommendation It is recommended that an assessment hearing e scheduled for August 27, 1990..Au g BAI jc Attachments Ger~va i s Avenue Improvement 88-14 Propose Assessement Area 4 3D•lkv 1 I N t t.34ac. N 1 t 3. 22 ac. II 2.39 ac.t.ZSic. 144 i 1 111 1 it 5} j 1 3' a t p 030 o 75 •S2 G'I O rn 323' ,2 -' 144144(opOP1)ac. 1 r"1 r 3 0-29--22-32 Ger~va i s Avenue Improvement 88-14 Propose Assessement Area 4 3D•lkv 1 33 t t.34ac. N 1 t 144 9) ul 3' i N SCALE N/A PAGE 1 OF 1 f' PROJECT Ala. 88--14 GERVA I S IMP ENGLISH /CUL DE SAC PROJECT SUMMARY SEC 10-- T.- 29-R- 22 -90 -32 3 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE STREETS *******895,000 FF AT * * *$36* 500 EA. SEC- 10--- T-- 29- R-- 22 -00-31 1 PARCELS ASSESSED rr.rwrr M rA iYr1r1Y rMrrY111M. - . ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE STREETS . .*******332,000 FF AT ***$36, EA, GRAND TOTALS 4 PARCELS ASSESSED 07-V -16 --1990 ASSESSMENT 32, 667-50 ASSESSMENT 12 118. 00 ITEM QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STREETS * * * ** 1, 227.000 FF AT *$36.500 EA. * *$44 s 785.50 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = ***$44 s 785.50 PROJECT NOW 88-14 GERVAIS IMP ENGLISH/CUL DE SAC NON QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL AV I1 = STREETS FF PIN NOW 10-29-22-32-0002 10-29-22-321-0003 I 2--32-0004 10-29-22-31-0041 GRAND 1 -01 -AL S COL 1 91. 0 0 200,0 400,00 332,.00 1227.00 PAGE I OF 1 07 . 16-1990 RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council,. prepared an assessment roll for. the construction of Gervas Avenue, City Project 88 -14, and the said assessment is on .file in the office of the ' city clerk NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 10 A hearing shall be held on the 27th day of August, 1990, at the city hall.at 7:10 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 20 The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and-that written or oral objections will be considered. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk city engineer have received costs for the improvement of Gervais Avenue from English Street to Minnesota Department of Transportation Laboratory Driveway, City Project 88-14, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount.to be specially assessed for such .improvement against.every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land.abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. To FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Endolwae City Manager.fid...,, Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Dat Southlawn Avenue, Beam to County.Road D, Project 85- 17-- -Schedule Assessment Hearing DATE: July 17, 1990 Introduction Final costs for the improvement of Southlawn Avenue are available. A proposed assessment roll is attached. It is requested that an assessment hearing be scheduled. Background The financing presented at the public hearing is given in the following table: Special assessments $282,400 Tax increment financing 205,000 Municipal state aid 425,000 912,400 The total project costs to date are $832,532.06. It is estimated that the final cost will be $834,.000. The actual amount.of cost eligible for.municipal state -aid funding increased to 437,383.13. If the special assessments and tax— increment financing are left unchanged., then the project would generate an excess of $924,783 13 — $834,000 = $90,783.13. Excess municipal state -aid funding is transferred to the street construction state -aid fund to supplement other projects. An appraisal of before and after market values of affected properties has been done. An appraisal of each property, rather than using a formula or policy, is the most appropriate method to determine assessments due to the limited number of parcels involved and the unique circumstances of each parcel regarding previous access to improved public right -of --way. The aggregate improvement in property value exceeds the special assessment funding of $282,400 presented at the public hearing. Therefore, it is proposed to assess each benefited property a' proportionate share of the total assessment of $282,,400 by the ratio of appraised increase in value for the property to the aggregate increase in market value for all affected properties. Project 85 -17 2 ..July 17, 1990 The proposed assessments are as follows: Map Property Number Identification Number Assessment 1 02- .29- 22 --22-0004 $ 35, 864 .80 2 02- 29 -22 -22 -0005 49, 137.60 3 02- 29- 22--22 -0006 1 4 02-- 29 -22 -23 -0002 3,106.40 5 03- 29-- 22--11 -0001 134 , 422 .40 6 03- 29- 22-14 -0004 58,456,80 Total $282,400.00 Recommendation It is recommended that an assessment hearing be scheduled as stated in the attached resolution. BAI jc. Attachments Ire 1 t( f ` i,?' ' w........r.L • iI 1, .,,. * 1 . . '------ ---A -1 1 l 41 At 11 r • 1 M _ •.• .• V . . -• _ -. - r •V r .• r _ •.•.• r • w• w. w w• . ... a r 1 • •• r ' • r •' • itrr .r •r w w . w 1 w r w • .. ..' • ' • I.I . w. r • r r r w. w r r r • r •w r r r r r.•w ws r +. Yj • r w w r r r w . L • n t i ,r d V 7 1 t r 1 . `•1 r o+ - rte - • (, ..---- . a ..,.r• a 4 t w I •/ r 1 t 1 t t O r w• r w •r ••• J OV 00 r ii !f • Oak' 11 9A or 4-f V" R 1 11 FUTURE STREET . 1 1 c ( . ter r •wr +r w. ... ....• / 11 • N - .+..r.. ........ • 1 iI I F I O •• i t I i : 11 ..• 1 1 1 \ 000 • ,. A.•• 1 I 1 . 1 i I , x i II ;.• it 1 I I I t `T'r ,. `,BEAM' A IMPROVEMENT 85 -17 Southl Drive Beam A Iv e o R o a D 1 RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council, prepared an. assessment roll for the construction of South.lawn Avenue, Beam Avenue to County Road D, City Project 85- .17 , and the said assessment is on file in the office of the city clerk. NOW, THEREFORE,.BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 10 A hearing shall be held.on the 27th.day of August, 1990, at the city hall at 7.20 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity.to be heard with reference to'such assessment. 2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 30 The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION.OF ASSESSMENT ROLL I WHEREAS, the city clerk and city.engineer have received final costs for the. 'improvement of Southlawn Avenue, Beam Avenue to County Road D, City Project 85 -170 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed. for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof. j AGENDA ITEM.. Action by Counai1: AGENDA REPORT Endorsed-_.- TO City Manager Modified -. w HeJ ected,,.,„,,,,„,,. FROM: Public Works Coordinator SUBJECT: Budget. Transfer DATE: July 16, 1990 On July 5, 1990 Unit 641 suffered severe. damage to the automatic transmission, cracking the case and rendering it incapable of being rebuilt. The subject unit is a Ford LTD with 77,500 miles. It was a former squad car which was transferred to the community development department and assigned to.the building official in July 1988. search of salvage yards was made in an attempt to locate a used transmission. This search was unsuccessful, largely due to the fact. that squad cars are equipped with large engines and heavy - duty drive shafts and rear ends that make them dissimilar to the vehicles usually found in salvage yards:. At. this time, two 1989 Chevrolet Corsicas (identical in make, model, and color to the other five staff cars currently in use) are - available. These are former driver education cars. One has 14 miles and sells for $8,300 plus $4.92 tax, and the other has 62.00 miles and sells for $8,500 plus $510 tax. This second vehicle would replace Unit 640, another 1985 Ford and former squad car with 92,000 miles. This vehicle is known to need a new rear end, and the same problems in locating used parts should be expected. This vehicle is currently assigned to the building inspector. It is recommended that the council authorize a budget transfer from the VEM unencumbered fund balance in an amount not to exceed 20,000, and to authorize acquisition of replacements for Units 640 and 641, w A Number .17 -04 .7 fL AGENDA REPORT, TO: Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director RE: 1991 PROPOSED BUDGET 0DATE, 7-17-90 Action by Counoil: Endorsed--,-,,--------, _- - ModifierL.__ ____ . _- Re ected- Date-, Printin of the 1991 Proposed Bud is scheduled to be completed on Jul 23rd, Copies of the document will be distributed at the Council meeting, Action b Cou AGENDA REPORT Endorsed - Modifiett— TO: Ma and Cit Council ReJected.-- Date FROM Cit Mana RE;_ 1991 DUES FOR ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES (AMM) DATE: Jul 16, 1990 INTRODUCTION Maplewood belon to the Association of Metropolitanla Municipalities, an or composed of the cities within the seven count metropolitan area,, This or monitors and works with metropolitan a and protects the interests of member cities in state-wide and re issues.. BA Each summer, AMM,,est.,abl i she s the dues for the comin year and requests ATOYment from its members. This year, the membership dues for the Cit is $5,747.,This is a 19% increase attributed th.the addition of a staff person to improve the Association's public relations .and communication efforts. A dues increas of this amo re a 2/3 membership vote for approval whiit.h,,isC scheduled for September 6,, 19900. If the increase is not approved, the Cit 1991 membership dues will be $5,046 (a 4,5% increase). RECOMMENDATION I It is hereb recommended to approve $5,,747 for the AMM 1991 membership dues July 2 1990 TO: Michael McGuire - City Manager RE: 1991 DUES FOR THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES The AMM Board, in accordance with the B - • establishing he A Program and setting By - is responsible forgAnnualBudgetandWorktcorrespondingmembershipuesrate, g he lica p The process for 1991 is morecomplicatedtedduetotheimpactoftherecommendationsbonscontainedIn thefinalreportoftheMissionandMembershipServicesTaskForcewhichyourecentlyreceivedunderseparatecover. The Board voted at theJune28thBoardMeetingtorecommendimplementationofthemajorMissionTaskForcerecommendations. Implementing recommendations in p enting the major Task ForceincludingtheadditionalstaffersonhasaPtotalcostofabout $38,000 which would result in a 190 dues Increase for membercitiesoverthe1990duesaid. Cons Maplewood b P Consequently, the 1991 AMM dues forPbasedonthisdecisionwouldbe $5 747 and preparing o I would ask you to usethatamountwhenprepgyur1991budget. The Board recognizes that this is a largege increase but believes it sessentialforseveralreasonsdetailedin •said report including thefollowing: 1. The need for the AMM to become more proactive •set the ;. r p active and visible inhelpingmet" opol - a agenda, We need to be ' ther erepresenttheAMMmembercitiesa to adequately at the Council. We needtohaveastaffpersonthere12 -15 hours per week• Increasedresponsibilitiesatthelegislaturehavemadeitfimpossiblesmallstafftomaintainthatkindofcommitment P or our 2. The AMM also needs to increase its pPenceat the StateLegislature. The AMM has been spread to thin' with the numbpolicyissuesinvolvedandwithoutst number of Policies detrimental ate groups promoting taximentaltothecollectiveinterestsofmetro 'area- cities, the AMM staff needs politantoincreasetheamountoftime itcanspendoneononepromotingAMMol.ic Positions.ol• P Y P itions. We alsoneedtoholdmetropolitanitanlegislatorsmoreaccountabletotheAMagenda. 183 university avenue east, St. paul, minnesota 55101 612 227 -400t 8 June 1990 Dear Chief Administrative Official: I NEED YOUR HELP NOW! 'The AMM must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the Only_ meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropolitan area to express in a united voice this important perspective of local government.' The above quote, perhaps more than any other statement, capsulizes the major conclusion of the 12 member AMM Mission and Membership Services Task Force which dust completed a year long evaluation and assesment of the AMM's mission, focus and general operations. The Task Force, in its final report, concluded that the AMM has been a very effective 'voice' and provides many benefits for the cities in the 7- county metropolitan area. However, the Task Force feels that we (The AMM) are at a crossroads and must not rest on our laurels as the problems and challenges facing us in the 90's are likely to be even more complex and difficult than the problems of the last decade. The enclosed Task Force report contains a 'blueprint for action' which if implemented should enable the AMM to remain a reliable and relevant tool for member cities as we enter the 90's. The bottom line, however, is that to follow this 'blueprint' we must hire an additional staff me er which could result in a dues increase of 2.0 to 25 2o-. The current three member staff does an outstanding job but the work load has increased so dramatically in recent years that to maintain current programs and increase our effectiveness at the Legislature and to become more proactive at the metropolitan level as recommended in the report, an additional staff member is mandatory. The Board would like to implement the Task Force recommendations and have the additional person on board by early 1991 but will not do so unless there is strong membership support for such action. Here is how your help is needed as asked for in the opening sentence of this letter: 1. Please provide copies of this letter and report to your Mayors and Councilmembers. 1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnes®ta 55101 (612) 227 -4008 1 i June 1990 Dear Chief Administrative Official: I NEED YOUR HELP NOW! 'The AMM must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the Only_ meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropolitan area to express in a united voice this important perspective of local government.' The above quote, perhaps more than any other statement, capsulizes the major conclusion of the 12 member AMM Mission and Membership Services Task Force which dust completed a year long evaluation and assesment of the AMM's mission, focus and general operations. The Task Force, in its final report, concluded that the AMM has been a very effective 'voice' and provides many benefits for the cities in the 7- county metropolitan area. However, the Task Force feels that we (The AMM) are at a crossroads and must not rest on our laurels as the problems and challenges facing us in the 90's are likely to be even more complex and difficult than the problems of the last decade. The enclosed Task Force report contains a 'blueprint for action' which if implemented should enable the AMM to remain a reliable and relevant tool for member cities as we enter the 90's. The bottom line, however, is that to follow this 'blueprint' we must hire an additional staff me er which could result in a dues increase of 2.0 to 25 2o-. The current three member staff does an outstanding job but the work load has increased so dramatically in recent years that to maintain current programs and increase our effectiveness at the Legislature and to become more proactive at the metropolitan level as recommended in the report, an additional staff member is mandatory. The Board would like to implement the Task Force recommendations and have the additional person on board by early 1991 but will not do so unless there is strong membership support for such action. Here is how your help is needed as asked for in the opening sentence of this letter: 1. Please provide copies of this letter and report to your Mayors and Councilmembers. 1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnes®ta 55101 (612) 227 -4008 2. Please place the report on your Council's Agenda for discussion and action prior to August 1 . 19901.0'. (If you would like an AMM board member to attend your council meeting when this item is discussed, please contact an AMM staff member to make the arrangements. 3. Please inform the AMM Office by no later than August 15th. as to whether your city supports or opposes adding a staff member and the resultant dues increase. (You will be notified as to the exact amount of such increase by no later than July 6th.) 4. Please have a representative from your city attend the special AMM Membership Meeting pre - scheduled for Thursday evening, September 20th. to consider and vote on this matter. I thank you in advance for your help and thoughtful consideration of this proposal Sincerely, og Larry Bakken, President Golden Valley Councilmember 2_ 39 If the AMM is to achieve the status of being recognized as the organization that speaks and represents the collective interests of metropolitan area cities, it is important that the association increase its visibility in the eyes of the Legislature, City Officials, the general public and the Metropolitan Council. An enhanced public relations system must be implemented and this cannot be done effectively without an additional staff person. A dues increase of such magnitude however, requires membership approval and there will be a special AMM Membership Meeting on Thursday evening September 6, 1990 to vote on this matter. ( a two /thirds maj ority of those present and voting is required for approval) . It is intended that the new staff person would handle a lot of the enhanced communications and public relations effort thereby 'freeing -up' the Director of Legislative Affairs and'the Executive Director for more 'one -on -one' contact at both the metro and state levels. A back -up budget based on a work program and staffing level similar to our 1990 level of activity and effort has also been prepared in case the 19 dues increase is not approved at the membership meeting. The dues for Maplewood to support the back -up budget would not exceed 5,046 which represents a 4.5% increase over the 1990 dues. The Board appreciates your continued support of the AMM efforts and.stron lg Y endorses the enhanced work program and resultant increase in dues. Do not hesitate to call me or our Executive Director, Vern Peterson should you have questions. We would also encourage you to make has representation at the September your cityo plans now to assure that your city 6th. meeting to vote the will of Thank you. 3esident Metropolitan Municipalities 2 - Sincerely, ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REPORT OF THE 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE TASK FORCE MEMBERS Kevin Frazell, City Administrator, Cottage Grove, Task Force Chair Mentor "Duke" Addi cks, Legislative Liaison, Minneapolis Bob Benke, Mayor, New Brighton Gary Jackson, City Manager, Coon Rapids James D. Prosser, City Manager, Richfield Marilyn Corcoran, Mayor, Dayton Nancy Jorgenson, Councilmember, Fridley Tom Spies, Counci lmember, Bloomington Katherine Trummer, Mayor, South St. Paul Larry Bakken, Counci lmember, Go den Valley Bob Long, Counc i 1 member, St. Paul Lu Stoffel, Mayor, Hastings 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 INTRODUCTION The League of Metropolitan Municipalities •LMM) was originally created in 1967asasubsectionandaffiliateorganizationoftheLeaguef '9 o Minnesota CitiesiesLMC) . The impetus for forming the LMM was the creation of the MetropolitanCCouncil, and the growth in importanCe andcies. It was felt Power of the regional operating agen-that the cities of the seven -count metropoliypoltan area neededanorganization, separate from but complementary to the LMC, to interact merged with withthoseagencies. In 1974, the LMM mer t Metropolitan 9 th the Suburban League of Muni cipal i -ti to become he Association of Municipalities AMM). As the needs of. AMM member i 'c ties have changed over the years the BoardDirectorshasstrivedtokeeptheorani of h 9 zaton relevant. During the late 1970'sandthroughoutoutthe1980s, the Associ focus has broadened •Metropolitan" affairs, to protecting from strictly wide P otect i ng the interests of member cities in state.de issues with unique impacts for the metropolitan1opolitan area. The most prominentrecentexampleeisthedistributionofstateaidstolocalovrgenments. In 1984, the Association .convened itsst Mi ss i on and Membership Services TaskForcetodoanindepthstudyoftheAMMandrecommendneededchanges. ThemajorconcernofthatTaskForcewasther •in r p of feration of splinter municipallobbyingggoupswithinthemetropolitanarea. The 1984 Task Force was concernedthattheAMMcouldloseitsviabilityasanumbrellaorganizationforall growing number metro -pol i tan cities in the face of a i ni . g g e of smallerer groups with differ-ences of opinionon on the alloocat on of state aid resources. Threcommendations, all of which have sin a group made 13sincbeenimplemented, with the except on ofexpandingthestaff. The final recommendation m o of the 1984 report was that theMiandMembershipbershipSeryicesreviewprocessshoulddbereevistedeveryfive Fortunately, predictions of any demise oft •he Association were ill- founded.Since the 1984 report was issued, five additional communitiesSouthSt. Paul Arden Hill ntles (West St. Paul,s, BlaineBlaineand Shoreview) have joined AMM. Thea Membershipnowincludes68metropolitanclationintcoveringover90percentofthepopu -he seven - county area. This is an all-time hi •9h for the Association.Ironically, one of the splinter groups which existed in 1984 the MunicipalCaucus, has since gone out of existence f after concluding that its aims andpurposeswerenotthatdifferentfromthoseofAMM. The meetings of this year's Mission and Membership •n e • ncreasin bershi p Sery ces Task Force, however,e place within the context of an i split ' have taken titan area and Greater Minn 9 P t between the metropo- fiscal Policies. The Task Force has studied Minnesota over taxation, local government aid and oth rstatefie be a _more eff ed carefully how the AMM mightectiveandunitedvoiceatthelegislatureonintheseven -count metropolitan g behalf of all citiesyo . • pot tan area. The Task Force has also considAssociationsrelationsh to the L ed thePLeagueofMinnesotaCities, and haw it mi hthelpstrengthenthatorganiinservinggtheinterestsofallcitiesthroughoutMinnesota. At the same time, the Task Force has not negl the original focus of AMMwhichwastoomonitorandworkwiththemetropolitanagencies. particular9Of 1 - concern is the observation that as AMM has become invol 'statewide issues the involved in more and moreestaff , n the area of has had a very noticeabl decrease i n the amtimeava 1 able to be spent i ount of metropolitan affairs. The Task ForcefeelsstronglythattheAMMshouldnotonlyco01itanoversig y co ect its decreased acti i nmetropsght, but should actually become proactive in helpingnregionalagenda. P g set the Richfield City Manager Jim Prosser and Gold have drafted "PURPOSES" Vall Counci lmember Larry 6akkenearevisedPURPOSESStatementforincorporationinthe 'attach d Associationbylaws. This document, e as Appendix A. has been adopted b the TaskForceasarecommendedmistatementf y or the Association. In a nutshell,the recommended mission is well-summarized in the first item of that PurposesStatement: To serve as the exclusive and primary representatipve of the collec-tive interests o a metropol i tan cities on metropolitan- andstatewideissueswithuniquemetro •q metropolitantan s gni f cance. To further that goal, the Task Force has made several 'e al observati and numerousrecommendationsforspecifiactionstoenhancethesucce r topical e s and performance oftheAssociation. Those are set forth by area as follows, and prefacedbybriefbackgroundmaterial.p During it deliberations the Task Force received input ' ce r p and advi from a numberofresourpersTheyarelisted -in Appendix B The Task Force wishexpressits es toexpgratitudefortheirtimeandcounsel. 2 - RELATIONSHIP TO THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES As indicated in the introduction, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities was originally created as a subsection of the League of Minnesota Cities and remains in that status today. As such, we are the only organization entitled to an ex officio (with voting privileges) seat on the League Board of Directors. We are considered an " a f f i l i a t e organization" of the League for the purposes of adopting legislative policy. The Association offices are located on the first floor of the LMC b u i l d i n g . Cities in the seven - county metropolitan area comprise approximately 15 percent of the LMC membership, but because of their size pay about one -half of the LMC dues. The Task Force met with LMC President Millie McCloud, as well as Executive Director Don Slater. A member of the Task Force, New Brighton Mayor Bob Benke, currently serves as vice president of the League. The Task Force observations are that the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have maintained a very positive working relationship. Despite the split in the LMC membership over local government aid policies, the AMM has never taken a legislative position in direct opposition to any adopted policy of the League. In fact, LMC and AMM lobbying staffs work cooperatively in many areas of policy agreement ( such as pay equity, labor relations law and tax increment financing) . Officials from Greater Minnesota have raised concerns about the relationship between the League and AMM. Specifically, it has been questioned whether the AMM should have the ex officio seat on the Board, and whether the relationship between the staffs of the two organizations has been compromisingly close. Due to these concerns, as well as our own concerns about the effectiveness of AMM as a subsection of the League, the Task Force considered carefully whether the AMM should be incorporated as a separate entity. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Because of division in its membership, the LMC has been neutralized from effective lobbying on some critical issues l i k e local government aid. T h i s means that the AMM must become more vocal and assertive on behalf of its member cities in these policy areas. At the same time, we wish to support the efforts of LMC to bring together its membership on divisive issues, and recommend that the LMC develop effective consensus b u i l d i n g and dispute resolution procedures that enable it to adopt policy positions that have credibility with the legislature. We encourage AMM member city officials to become more actively involved in the LMC, creating a metropolitan constituency group and perspective within the LMC. 2. We recommend that the Association not be incorporated as a legal entity separate from the League of Minnesota Cities. We wish to be supportive of the _MC, and to encourage AMM member city officials to become more active in the League. We feel that this goal can be best accomplished in our current status as subsection of the League. 3 - 3• We recommend that the AMM reject an r •Y requests that t give up the ex offiseatontheLMCBoard, The Task Force feels.stron 1 • nes and spiritri 9 Y that we have livedved uptotheguideliptunderwhichweareanaffiliateorganizationizatii .e. not takingng contrary lobbying os i t i g . on p ons). 4• We recommend that, as long s P •g P ble, the AMM offices remain_ in the -LMCbuilding. We feel that to move from the building •erat i 1 d ng wou 1 d undermine much ofthecoopveworkingrelationshipthatexistsbetweentheestaffsofthetwoorgan1Zdtions. It would also be expens i v'e for the AMM to acquire theoverheadandsupportservicesthatitcurrentlyHowever, expansion f Y Purchases from LMC,P o the AMM staff may make a move from the existingbuildingunavoidable. ng LMC 5 • We recommend that the AMM boar •Board and Membership focus its agenda b refer -ring more of the non - divisive statewide issues Y ues to the LMC for lobbyingngonbehalfofallmembercities, both metropolita •p an and Greater Minnesota. 4 - LOBBYING Legislative policy adoption and lobbying h • Associ r y 9 ave become the major focus for the n 1974, i t had two standing growing steadily over the years. When the Association wiPolis as formed9Pycommitteesand35legislativepolicies.Todayy the Association has five standing committee •adopted over 100 ie i g es, and the membership hasgslativepoliesforthecurrentbiennium. •several ad hoc study commi ttees f In adds t on,or specialized topics (i.e. land use legi sla-rulestion, metropolitan significance group • n the pastfewears. , 9 p homes) have been formed iy Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically ionrecentyears. At the .same time, other muni lobbyingtheCoalitionof gro -ups, most notablyGreater to Minnesota Cities, have aggressively r •cies that are detri gg y P omoted tax poli-he collectiveective i nterests of the metropolitanitan rParea,Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been i challenged to accomplish more and moreatthelegislature, sl ature, without any significantficant increase in resources, Legislators with whom the Task Force met describedetentandwellbed our lobbying staff as compe1respected. At the same time, the legislators n admitted that theaggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municip lobby i ngroupshaveprobablyledtomoresuccessina y g accomplishing their agendas. Inresponsetotheseconcerns, the AMM for the first time hiredduringthe1990sessioned contract lobbyists Legislators expressed their frustration with t •in r he increasing regionalism of citylobbyingggoups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire Stateae at the sametimewemoreactivelypursuetheinterestsofthemetropolitancities. It w salsosuggestedthathavingabetterdatabasefor a o lobbying would be helpful inpressingtheAMMposition. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organizatio with the authori andcredibilitytospeakonbehalfofallcitiesint •tan area, he seven - county metropol- 2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the •e umber of Policycy ssues i t slobbying, and needs to l i m i t active involvement •to three types of issues: a) Issues of concern only to metropolitanitan ci tiP es - i. i nteract i onwithMetropolitanCouncilandoperatingagencies, g Chapter 509WatershedManagementOrganizations, etc. b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in thehe metropolitanarea - i , e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, a cing, etc. C) Statewide issues where the interests of themmetropolitan areamaybedifferentthan, and at times even contrary • t y o, those in theremainderoftheStatee - i . e. local government aid formulas Specific suggestions for limiting ur most active i g legisl agenda itemstothesetopicscsareincludedudedinthesectiononcommitteesandthepoladoptionprocess, 5- 3. The AMM's lobbying efforts in the property tax area have been hinderedeed bylackofimmediateaccesstoacomputerizedpropertytaxmodel, The TaskPyakForcerecommendsthattheAMMBoardofDirectorscloselyonitorthe prog of the League f Mi y 9 g e o nnesota Citiesies i n developing a property tax -model that is useable and immediately accessible to all cities. If thi s proves inadequate to meet our needs, the AMM membership should be re aredtobeartheexpofdevelin P p P p g its own property tax modeling system. 4. The AMM should be proactive, and not just reactive in its legislative osi-t i on s. For example the AMM g P p e has never produced its own recommended formulafordistributionoflocalgovernmentaids, and should consider doing so. 5. At the same time we become more proactive we shouldd aalsostay n t road adopting y o he highpgpositionsthatreflectectresponsiblepublicpolicyforthe entire State of Minnesota. 6. AMM member city officials should become more active and involved in the League of Minnesota Cities and its policy study committees. Inssome cases,we may find ourselves lobbying the LMC, rather than the State legislature to pursue articular policy positions legislature, P p y po tons that are of common interest to all cit in the metropl i tan area. 7. The AMM should increase the amount of time its end legislators P s one -on -one with expl ai ni ng AMM positions. i ons. We al hold metropolitanlegislatorsmoreaccountabletotheAMMagendabydevelopingandpublish-i ng a "scorecard" following each legislative session. 8. In pursuing our legislative agenda, we should a ourselves" realit P ealithatlobbyingisanongoingprocess. Policy positions should be P ursuednotonlyforimmediategains, but for maintaining a 1 ong -term osi ti ve relationship ith the State P P e government and with the League of MinnesotaCities. COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND POLICY ADOPTION PROCESS The Association currently follows a procedure whereby potential 1 egi sl ati ve policies are brought forth and considered for adoption in the five standing policy committees (revenues, metropolitan agencies, transportation, housing and economic development, general legislation). As indicated earlier, the Associ - ation currently has over 100 adopted legislative policies. The policies have been divided into categories as to level of effort in lobbying. The AMM now finds itself actively involved in issues that are not limited in interest to the metropolitan area, even where our positions are similar to those of cities in Greater Minnesota. The best recent example is pay equity, where the AMM position is almost identical to that of the League of Minnesota Cities. Yet because of the high v i s i b i l i t y and strong feelings surrounding this issue, many member cities expected the AMM staff to be active in lobbying on this issue. There is also the dilemma of issues that are of interest to a single city, or a limited number of cities. The AMM Board and staff have attempted to be respon- sive to the needs of each member city, but a question is raised as to whether it is fair to take time and resources away from issues that are of more importance to the broader membership. The Task Force discussed at length what to do about issues that are divisive among our own members, for example fiscal disparities or funding for combined sewer overflow abatement. A majority of the committee concluded that the AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on these issues, as it would be left neutralized on issues of high importance to 'a large number of city off i - cials and thereby foster the growth of still more splinter groups. Finally, the Task Force examined the five standing policy committees, concluding that. they are working well and that none should be eliminated, In fact, it was speculated "that as new social and legislative probl ems appear (i.e. the drug crisis) there will likely be a need for additional standing or ad hoc committees. The Task Force further suggests that there may be utility in having a broad - based "futures" committee to simply help the organization anticipate and be prepared for pending issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Association needs to focus most of its resources and effort on the few issues of very highest priority to the entire membership. At the same time, the AMM should not narrow its agenda to the point that it loses the interest and support of its broad base of cities. 2. In order to accommodate the legitimate interests of all member cities, we recommend that AMM create an "endorsed" category of policies. These would be. policies of interest to a limited number of cities, or those where the League of Minnesota Cities or some other group might reasonably be expected to adequately represent the interests of metropolitan cities. With the AMM endorsement". the AMM would be officially on record as supporting these policies, but not actively involved in lobbying or initiating legislation. 7- 3. The existing Legislative Coordinating Committee (LCC) shoul be the screening and dividing" group for determining lobbying priorities and deciding which polici will be "endorsed" and referred to other groups i.e. LMC) for lobbying. 4. We recommend that the Association. strive to achi real consensus on divisive issues, and not merely concurrence through a majority vote. Committee. chairs as well as Board members might benefit from professional training in dispute resolution. The AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on issues that are controv.ersi al among its own membership. While such avoidance may "buy peace" in the short term, in the long term it neutrali the eff ec- ti veness of the organization, undermining its credibility with legisl and causi the proliferation of splinter groups surrounding special issues. The AMM should make use of dispute resolution services, such as the Office of Dispute Resolution in the State Planning Agency and * the Mediation Center, a private non - profit community mediation service based in St. Paul, 5. The two - thirds majority vote requirement for adoption of legislative policies should be retained. M OTHER METROPOLITAN LOBBYING GROUPS The Task Force met with Minnetonka City Manager Jim Miller regarding 'al Legislativeislative Commi g 9 g the Muni -ci P 9 Commis and Brooklyn Park Mayor Jim Krautkramer re re_senting the Northern Mayors' Association. T rep re- Task Force observation s thattheAMMhasbeenabletoformeffectiveandcooperativeverelationshi 'ec i al i zed rou s an P Ps with thesespg • p , . • d that they shouldd not be seen as a threat to the AMM.As indicated in the introduction, an additional splinter group which i ' al Caucus, P 9 P existed i n1984, the Muni ci p cus, has si gone out of existence. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. We recommend that the AMM strive to be the organization see 'mate. voice to .9 a as the legt-speak on behalf of all cities in the seven - county metro oli-tan area, whil recognizing the legitimate P g 9 need of some breakoff groups forspecialpurposes. 2. The AMM should not perceive existing specialized rou s as a threat, 9 p ea butattempttomaintainacooperativeandmutuallysupportivevereltiyPpaonship. 3. We recommend that the AMM maintain its openness to all cities in the seven -county metropolitan area, resisting any impetus to limit membership o amorelimitedgroup (i.e. suburban P 9 caucus). RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND OPERATING AGENCIES As indicated in the Introduction, monitoring and oversight of the Metropolitan Council and regional operating agencies was the original focus of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Yet in recent years, involvement with the Council and agencies has suffered appreciably as the AMM staff has had to spend more and more time supporting the work of its own committees and lobbying on statewide issues. In fact, the staff indicated that it now has almost no time for any involvement with the Metropolitan Council during the legislative session. The AMM currently nominates to the Metropolitan Council eight names for appoint - ment to the Transportation Advisory Board. The Association actually appoints ten to the Transportation Advisory Committee. That system seems to be working well. In contrast, the AMM, along with several other metropolitan area asso- ci ati ons, was recently given legislative responsi bi 1 i ty for suggesting appoin- tees to the Regional Transit Board. That process did not go well. The Board of Directors did not limit the number of people recommended for appointment to the vacant seats, and the Metropolitan Council heeded very few of its recommen- dations in making their selections. During its background work, the Task Force discussed the Metropolitan Council at some length with several legislators, as well as the current Chair of the Metropolitan Council and a former executive director of the Citizens League. There was a general feeling among the legislators that the Council has not been effective in performing its functions well. At the same time, it was suggested that the Counci lmembers are frustrated due to their lack of a "real clout" and constant legislative undercutting of their authority to accomplish the work for which they are responsible. With no consensus in the legislature or in the metropolitan area as to the appropriate" - amount of authority that should be vested in the Counci 1, , many metropolitan regional issues get resolved vis-a-vis the political process of the legislature. The - shortcomi ng of this approach is that the metropolitan area is g.i vi ng up some of the authority to set its own agenda. There is also some con- fusion and ambiguity over the relationship of the Council to the Governor, who is responsible by law for appointing its members. It was suggested that the AMM could very definitely be of help in defining the proper role for the_ Counci 1 and the operating agencies, and in mustering legislative support to enact needed changes. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should become more proactive in helping set the metropolitan agenda. Historically we have placed ourselves in somewhat of a watchdog or adver- sarial role with the Council and operating agencies, merely reacting to the proposals put forward. We should become more positive in identifying areas of legitimate regional involvement, and help to set the goals and objec- tives to be pursued by regional government, as well as the parameters within which that work will be carried out. 2. We need to "be there". It is estimated that an AMM staff member should be at the Metropolitan Council and agencies from eight to sixteen hours per 10 - week, interacting with the Counc.i lmembers and the staff, and keeping r naffectedcitiesinformedmeda d up -to -date as to what is happening in regional government. Other responsibilities have kept the staff from a f u l l commitment to this vital role, and this shortcoming should be corrected expeditiously. 3. The appointment of members to the Advisory Board and Technical Advisory Committee seems to be functioning well and should continue as present. 4. The AMM should continue to support i is . 1 egi sl ati ve responsibility to nomi - nate persons for appointment to the Regional. Transi t Board. The AMM Board of Directors should do a better job of screening the applications which are received, so as to indicate to the Metropolitan Council those eo 1 e thatPP it truly wants appointed to the RTB. 5. The Task Force recommends , that the AMM pursue the possibility of the creation of a metropolitan appointments review committee for the merit review of persons being considered for appointment to the 'Metropol i tan Council and other regional agencies. The selection board would include representatives appointed by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, the Metropolitan Intercounty Association the Citizens League, the League of Women Voters, etc. 60 Finally, the Task Force recommends that the AMM be the impetus for creation of a blue ribbon committee to sturdy and better define the mission, role and purposes of the Council and regional agencies. While AMM would be the host, it would be important to involve other 9 overnment associations and good government" groups. Also, the the task should be approached in a spirit of cooperation with the Metropolitan Council members. The study of the blue ribbon committee should include alternatives for the selection and appointment of Metropolitan Council members, mom PUBLIC RELATIONS If, as suggested in the revised Purposes statement, the AMM is to be the exclusive representative of the collective interests of the metropolitan cities, then it is important that the Association increase its visibility in the eyes of the legislature and the general public. The Task Force reviewed and endorsed the work of the AMM' s Legislative Coordinating Committee Public Relations Subcommittee to establish a public relations system to inform the public, including media, legislators, and AMM legislative contacts about metropolitan city issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Media contacts should be identified in each AMM- member city vis-a-vis a legislative contact response form. Legislative contacts in each city should be responsible for interaction with local newspapers, radio, city newsletters, cable television, etc. 29 The AMM staff should identify and establish relationships with contacts within the major metropolitan area media, both print and electronic. 3. A delegation of the AMM staff and Legislative Coordinating Committee should meet with major newspaper staffs early in legislative sessions to discuss AMM priorities and positions. Media contacts, both local and metropolitan wide, should be invited and encouraged to attend our l e g i s l a t i v e breakfasts. 4. During legislative sessions, we should issue specific press releases on AMM priori -ties, and response to important issues (i.e. tax policy) as changes are proposed. 5. At the conclusion of each legislative session, we should issue press releases on the AMM' s legislative agenda, and how well we believe the legislature met the needs of metropolitan area municipalities. 6. We recommend that AMM develop a "report card" of priority issues with ratings for each legislator. These should be distributed to member cities with suggestions for potential local use. 7 . We need to identify potential a l l i e s on important issues, i.e. Chambers of Commerce, League of Women Voters, etc. 12 - COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBER CITY OFFICIALS The Task Force feels that the AMM needs to develop a metropolitan "conscious- ness" among member city officials, so that they will buy into and promote 't-he AMM' s agenda. Unfortunately, Counci lmember time is scarce, making it difficult to insure that each and every member city official is well-informed and aware of AMM activities, policies and priorities. The first recommendation of the 1984 Task Force report was that the AMM should expand its effort to communicate directly with all elected officials in member cities, as opposed to only mayors and city managers. Since that time, the AMM has had differing distribution lists for different types of communications. Apparently, this is causing a great deal of confusion, and may actually be causing a decrease in consistent communications. RECOMMENDATIONS 1 . The AMM should strive to publish a short executive summary of l e g i s l a t i v e positions that could be quickly read by member city officials who don't want the "full shot ". 2. An AMM contact person, preferably the City Manager /Administrator, should be developed in each city. All communications should be sent to that one con- tact person, plus the Mayor, with the contact person taking responsibility for seeing that the material is duplicated and sent to all members of the governing body. The AMM contact person will also be responsible for reporting on AMM activities at the Council meeting. AMM should work with the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA) to enlist the support of Managers /Administrators for reproduction and distribution of these 3. Member cities should be encouraged to place discussion of AMM policies and issues on regular City Council agendas to ensure that all elected officials are kept aware of AMM activities, as well as to increase the Association's visibility with local media. 4. Each member of the AMM Board of Directors should commit to make a brief presentation at four or five surrounding City Council meetings once each year on AMM policies and activities. 13 - WORKLOAD AND STAFFING When originally formed, the AMM had four full-time staff members. Shortly thereafter, in response to a financial shortfall, the staff was cut to three and has remained at that number since. During that time, the number of legislative policies has increased from 35 to over 100, and the number of legislative study committees from two to five. The Association has taken on other responsibilities including the license and permit survey, and coordination and administration of the Metropolitan Salary Survey. With more time being spent on lobbying of statewide issues and support for committees, there has been a decided time. shift away from interaction with the Metropolitan Council and operating agencies. Yet the AMM is the only organiza- tion providing any real oversight of these agencies. For example, we are usually the only commentor on the Metropolitan Council's annual work program and budget. The AMM Membership has come to expect more involvement by the Association, not only in metropolitan issues, but in tax policy, pay equity, tax increment financing, and other areas of statewide concern and involvement. The 1984 Mission and Membership Services Task Force report recommended very strongly that the Board of Directors seek ways to add a staff member., Yet this is the only one of the 1984 recommendations that has yet to be implemented. To quote that report, "the present staff simpl cannot adequatel cover all the critical issues, agencies, committees and the legislature." The present Task Force report-, if ultimately adopted and implemented by the Board and membership, w i l l only serve to increase the workload significantly. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Task Force strongly recommends that the Board of Directors add a staff person. We further recommend that this person have responsibilities in: a. communicating with member cities and maintaining the legislative contact system b. public relations, including media contacts c. staffing some of the standing and ad hoc legislative committees d. some monitoring of Metropolitan Council and agency activities, particularly during the legislative session. 2. With regard to lobbying at the Capitol, the Task Force observes.that this effort w i l l fluctuate from time to time. Therefore, it is recommended that increased efforts in this area be handled through use of contract lobbyists. 14 - DUE S The membership dues for the Association are currently set at 46 percent of a member's dues for the League of Minnesota Cities. Since the League dues are set in part on a per capita basis, this works out to AMM dues ranging from a high of 30 cents per capita for Woodland to a low of 4 cents for Minneapolis. The dues for an average sized city of 30,000 population are $5,100, or about 17 cents per capita. Compared to other city lobbying organizations, the AMM is a bargain! For example, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities charges its members 40 cents per capita, plus from time to time, an additional 20 cents per capita for special projects". Dues for the Municipal Legislative Commission are approxi- mately 35 cents per capita, to a maximum of $12,500. If the AMM Board of Directors and membership are to implement our recommendation to add a staff person, a dues increase beyond the rate of inflation i s inevi- table. In addition, the cost of developing the computerized property tax model, if determined necessary, will be a considerable initial expense, and require ongoing personnel and data gathering costs. RECOMMENDATION 1. In order to implement the other recommendations in this report, the AMM Board of Directors and membership should be prepared to adopt a dues increase in the range of 20 to 25 percent above the rate of inflation. The Board may wish to look at ways of phasing the dues increase over a two to three year period. 2. The Board and membership should also be prepared to provide financial sup - port for development and maintenance of a property tax modeling system, if the LMC system fails to materialize or is determined inadequate to meet the lobbying needs of the AMM. 15 - SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year. During its relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many di ff i -. culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the more recent debates over local government aid. Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations l i k e the Association, the AMM is now at an all -time high of 68 member cities, repre- senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven- county metropolitan area. The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value for their membership dollars. However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years Mission and Membership Services Task Force have concluded that this is no time to rest on our laurels. We face challenges from other city lobbying groups whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri- cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities. The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable and relevant, the AMM must become more proactive, more col 1 aborati ve, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropol i - tan area to express in a united voice important perspective of local govern- ment.. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing f i e l d and leave all the important decisions to others. 11 ne Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter groups who had originally felt that they had little i n common, but came to realize than the things they did have in common were far more than those that divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less than those that faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an effective voice for the collective interests of the cities 'in this metropolitan area, and to pass that test will require two things: 1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com- mittees and 19- member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on the critical issues that face us. 2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the policies we do adopt to, the Governor, the legislature, the Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies. The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations set forth i n this report w i l l set us well on a course to accomplishing just that. We commend it for your consideration and thoughtful action. 16 - APPENDIX A POSES The purpose of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities shall be to 1. Serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the collective interests of all metropolitan cities on metropolitan wide issues and state wide issues with unique metropolitan significance. 2. Promote collaborative problem solving efforts between and among cities, the State, the Legislature, private interests and other public interests. 3* Effectively express in a unified voice, policies concerning the structure, powers and other matters relating to municipal government for the municipalities in the metropolitan to the Legislature, Metropolitan Council and agencies, LMC, media and cities. 4. Serve as a forum through which all municipalities or groups of municipalities may develop and propose policies and positions on matters on concern to the metropolitan municipalities and develop strategies for advocating those policies and positions. 5. Serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and information among municipalities in the metropolitan area and to foster intermunicipal cooperation. 6. Assist member cities resolve disputes with other cities and agencies. 7. Develop and provide, either alone or in concert with League of Minnesota Cities or other organizations or agencies, programs of technical assistance to member municipalities. S. Establish specific prioritized agenda, including Legislative proposals to address member community needs. 9. Foster, generate and promote information and data concerning the problems and issues and proposed solutions affecting municipal government in the metropolitan area to the State Legislature, in particular, and to the public at large. 10. Enhance the effectiveness of municipal government in the metropolitan area by holding conferences and by fostering pertinent research projects. 11. Coordinate the efforts of AMM members to promote their interests within the League of Minnesota Cities. 12. Enhance the quality of life in the metropolitan area and its cities by promoting efficient and progressive service delivery systems for our residents. APPENDIX B i i st of resource persons who consulted with the Task Force: Vern Peterson, Executive Director,, Association of Metropolitan Municipal ities Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Donald Slater Executive Directors League of Minnesota Cities Jim Miller, Minnetonka City Manager and Representative of Municipal Legislative Commission Jim.Krautkramer, Brooklyn Park Mayor, President of Northern Mayors' Association - Millie McCloud, President League of Minnesota Cities State Representative Phil Carruthers (DFL -47B) , Chair of Metro Affairs Subcommittee of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee State Representative Alice Johnson (DFL -51A), Vice Chair of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee Al Loehr Legislative Administrative Assistant to Senator Bob Schmitz DFL -36 ). Chair of Senate Local and Urban Affairs Committee Steve Keefe, Chair, Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Ted Kol deri e Former Executive Director Citizens League of the Twin Cities AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins t c Subject: Charitable Gambling Ordinance Date: July 17, 1990 Introductio Sections 15 -34 through 15 -42 are being added to the Maplewood gambling ordinance to regulate charitable gambling within the City of Maplewood. Action by Counoil En;dors edl.. ReJ ected„,,...,. Date Background This charitable gambling ordinance conforms to current State law as enacted by the 1990 Minnesota Legislature. Discussion This proposed addition to the Maplewood gambling ordinance should be given to the Maplewood City Council for their review, recommended changes, and passage. Recommendatio It is recommended that the Maplewood City Council review the attached ordinance addition and pass it at its first reading. Action Regu i red Submit to the City Council. KVC:js Attachment CHARITABLE GAMBLING Sec. 15 - 34_, In general . Lawful gambling conducted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 shall be operated in accordance with the conditions prescribed in this ordinance and other applicable provisions of the Maplewood ordinances. Authorized forms of gambling. All forms of lawful gambling may be approved b the city council subject to the terms and conditions of this ordinance and all provisions of Statute 349. Sec 15 -35 Notice: approval or disapproval. The Minnesota Charitable Gambling Board shall notify the city council in writing in the manner required by law of each pending application for a charitable gambling license at least thirty (30)days before issuing or renewing the license. Each pending application for a license shall be approved or , disapproved bY resolution of the city council. Sec. 15 -36. Location. Lawful gambling under license issued by the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control_ Board may be conducted only at the following locations: a)I.n the licensed organization' s hall where it has its regular meetings. No organization shall rent, lease, or occupy, directl,or indirectly, any other property for the purpose of conducting gambling, except an on-sale ,establishment as permitted in this ordinance; b) In licensed ,on -sale liquor, wine, and beer establishmentsi c ) ,. Notwithstanding subsections (a), and (b) above, (raffle only) licenses may be approved for any proper location; d) No location shall be a roved for gambling unless it complies with the applicable zon i n b u i l d i n g , f ire and health codes of the C i t y of Maplewood. Sec. 15 -37, Conditions. The conduct of lawful gambling under license issued by the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board shall be subject to the following conditions in the City of Maplewood. a) No sale consumption, or possession of liquor, wine or 3.2 beer shall be permitted during gambling conducted by a licensed organization', except as permitted under a valid on -sale liquor, wine, or 3.2 beer license or a bottle club permit: provided further that no sale consumption, or possession of li uor wine or 3.2 beer shall be permitted in the room where a bingo session is taking place; _ b) No organization shall be eligible for a gambling license unless, for the three (3) y _immediately precedi the date of application, it has had an office and holds regular monthly meetings in the City of Maplewood and demonstrates that during that period it has performed substantial services within the City of Maplewood or on behalf of residents of Maplewood; c No.or anization shall hold more than one 1 ) ga blin license for an location i n the* City of Maplewood except an organization that holds a gamblin license for its own building may hold one 1 additional gambling license for any_ location _ in the City of Maplewood., d) Before any person ma serve as amblin mana er for any or anization licensed to conduct gambling in the City of Maplewood, that person must have satisfactorily completed a course of instruction conducted bv the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board on the duties and responsibilities of the gambl ngmana er. Sec..15 -38. Investigation. Every organ i, zat i on which files an application for issuance or renewal of a charitable qambling license shall deliver the a lication to the city clerk. The city clerk and the olice department designee shall investigate each application and report their findings and recommendations to the city council. Sec. 15 -39. Permits for exempt organizations under Minnesota Statutes Section 349.214. Every organization seeking to conduct charitable gamblin which is exempt from state licensing under Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.2144 shall obtain a permit issued bv, the city counci 1, subject to the fol l owi ng conditions : a) The or anization shall pay a permit fee of fifty dollars 50.00 per d_. C b) Permits for all classes of gambling activities may be a roved c) Charitable gambling by an organization exempt from l i c e n s i n g under Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.214, may be conducted on the premises of a licensed on -sale liquor, wine or beer establishment or a bottle club subject to the restrictions in this cha ter relatin to the conduct of amblin in on sale establishments and bottle clubs; d) Except as provided in subsection ( above, the sale, consumption, and possession of intoxicatinliquor at a _ambling event by an exempt organization shall be prohibited, however, 3.2 beer may be served and consumed only under a valid temporary on -sal a beer l i cense; e) The organization shall comply with all statutory requirements for an exempt organization, including the thirty 30 day notice requirement to the City of Maplewood. The city council when granting a permit to an exempt organization'. may waive the thirty 30 day notice re uirement. Sec. 15 -40. F i l i n gng of records`; inspection: access to records, a) Every organization licensed to conduct gambling in the C i t y of Ma l ewood shall file with the c i ty clerk and director of public safety copies of all records and reports required to be filed with the Minnesota Charitable Gambl i ng Control Board pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Cha ter 349 and the rules and regulations p romul aced thereunder. The records and reports shall be due at the same time they are due to the board; b Every gambling event in the City of conducted b an organization under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 shall be open to inspection by officers of the Maplewood Police Department; CL-Employees of the Maplewood Police Department may inspect. at any reasonable time without notice or search warr all records of a licensed organization includin amblin account and other bank records re uired b the ,Minnesota Charitable Gamblinq Board to be maintained and Sec. 15 -41. Lawful gambling at on -sale establishments. Lawful gamblingat on -sale li uor .wine and 3.2 beer establishments shall be conducted in compliance with the fol 1 owi nq regulations: a Only for charitable and raffles may be issued except wher the licensed or anization also holds the on -sale 'liquor. wine or 3.2 beer licenses for the premises. in which case any qambling license ma be issued; b) On -sale establishments shall be limited to one licensed gambling organization at any one time in the licensed premises and anyrooms adjoining the premises under the same management. No lease shall be made with one organization while another lease is in effect for the same on -sale establishment; c) Every agreement between a non - profit organization and an on -sale premises for gambling shall be i n the form of a written lease. The written lease shall be the complete agreement between the parties, and there shall be no unwritten terms or conditions. The lease shall provide that the lessee shall operate only after issuance of a license and shall be subject to the terms of this ordinance; d) A co of any lease agreement between a non-profit organization and an on -sale licensee shall be filed with the city clerk and the director of public safety with the gambli license application; e) ..- A lease agreement between a non-profit organization and an on -sale establishment shall not provide for rental payments based on a percentage of receipts of ,profits from lawful gambl. i nq . There shall be no other compensation paid to the on -sale establishment, directly or indirectly, other than the rental fee provided in the lease agreement. The maximum rental fee shall be six hundred dollars {$600.00} per month; f) All gambli shall be conducted from a booth or other area properl segregated from the rest of the licensed remises. The physical layout of the area set _aside for qamblin _ shall be subject to the approval of the Maplewood Police Department ; g) The gambl i ng booth shall be constructed .and maintained by the organization licensed to conduct gambling and shall be under the exclusive control of that organization. The organizat ion licensed to conduct amblin romi nentl di s l a its name at its gambling booth and shall indicateshall that a p11 rofi is from ambl i ng are for the benefit of the organization;g Ch) - No em to ees or agentsnts of the on -sale establishment shall handle qambling devices . - gamblinq money,ori zes. or gamblin ecords, nor shall they record winner re 1a s or free - games, nor shall the otherwise conduct or assist the licensed g amblin or anizations in _ conducting the gambl operaLi gn i )en shall be jointly employed , by both the non - profit organizationNrso and the on -sale establishments The _ qambling booth shall be se arate from the liquor service bar. Noj)- amblin shall be from the li uor service bar• k The organization licensed to conduct gambling shall have exclusiveon t hecontroloverallamblindevicesmoneandrecords. Whenever or anization is not resent all amblin devices mone and records s h all be secure 1 locked and shall be inaccessible to employees of the on - sale e ta.,bl ishmenti 1) -__ No _ gamblinq funds shall be commingled with funds of the on-sale establ i shment; im - ) No food drink or entertainment discounts or other shall be offered in conjunction with the sale of amblin devices or chances n) The on -sale establishment shall allow the organization to conduct a mblin at an time during-its lawful business hours and shall ambling at any time other than its lawful business hours; o) The on -sale licensee shall make no agreements with any Clambl eauiDment distributor re uirin the use of his or her gamblinq in the establishment;_ p)-----.-.Subsections 15 -41 f - W., W shall not appl when the licensed - gamblin or anization is also the holder of the on -sale license for the establishment where the qambling is conducted• The - city council may disc rove a qamblinq license a lication for an on -sale establishment in which ggmbling violations have previously occurred. Sec. 15 -42. Local amblin tax. a) .----- There i s hereby i m osed a tax on all lawful gambling conducted in the City of Maplewood by or ani zati ons licensed b the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board at the rate specified in this section; b) An organization's receipts from lawful gambling that is exempt from licensing under Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.2144 are not subject to th tax imposed by this section; i On all i awful aam the t 'receJ is Of a 1,,iCe ax i s three (3) ercent of the grossnsedoranizati6fromlawfulamb ' •aid out a able b t I n less ri zes actual 1heoranzaton• Ld) The tax im posed •p d by this sectio shall be paidshallbereortedonadaid on a monthl basis andu1 cate co of the mbl i n t `--the Minnesota Charitable a ax return Bled withGambl n Control Board each monbeanexactduplicateofthe th• The re shallreortfiled - with the Minnesota C 'Gamblin Control Board with- Ch signatures ut the or additions and mustoforanizationofficialsas costa n there red on the rer form The - tax return and a ment 0f the tax due must •delivered received in be - Postmarked or if hand-the office of the Ma lewood Fibeforethelastbusinessda Hance De artment on or re ort of the month fo1lowin the month 'p i s made , for which the An inc0m lete tax return ' l l not be cand wi onsidered t i mel f ireturnedbtheduedatefor led unless corrected u s and fl n Dela s in the mail in •ostmark n are the res ons i bi l i ma 1 ck-t of the or an i It ion,on . The tax return and tax a . ym •ent shall be delivered to: Ma lewood Finance Departmentnment Att Gambl i n Taxationj830CountRoadB Maplewood MN 55109 Checks shall be made a abl •t• . Ma lewood Finance Department e There shall •be an interest char a of eiunaidbalanceofall ht 8 ercent eroverduetaxe "section; an or anization under this f The cit council •1 shall disa rove an end .or ors anal issue of a charitabl n a pl cat on for renewal11 owes deli n Ue a ambl i n 1 i cense for an or an i z •q nt 4amb1 i n taxes t0 the C i t at i on whichdLrectorofpublicOfMalewood. Further thepsafetymaynotiftheMinnesota -- -- of an or an i zat ion owi n ota Chari tabl a Gambl i n Boardand e board r dell amblin taxes tomareuestthat. th the C t of Ma 1 ewooddurintheevokeorsusendtheoranizati •incense ear. The cit c on s license sale or off -sal a ounce l shall not issu or , renewrenewalcoholicbeveragelicense an on- or ani bottle club ermitlicensetoan or foozationwhichowesdelin d of Maplewood The abov uent amblin taxes to the C'e remedies are not exclusive t vtoanotherowersandremeandshallbeinadditiondiesrovidedblaw.