Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990 05-31 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 30 P.M., Thursday, May 31 199 Council Chambers, Municipal pal Building Meeting No. 90 -11 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 19 Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -10 (May 14, 1990) D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA E. CONSENT AGENDA 1. A pproval of Claims 2 • Replacement of Clerk-Typist • 3. Investment Policies in Finance Department 4. 1990 Budget Changes: Wages/Benefits Budget Ch g 5 • 19 90 Bud g Changes: Finance Department 6. 1225 Frost Avenue (George s Auto) 7. Budget Transfer: Central Ramsey Watershed Management Or aniza ' tion 8. Budget Transfer: Desk Chairs 9. Emergency Management irs g Director and Deputy Director 10. Request to Replace Public Salaries Safety Dispatcher G• AWARD OF BIDS 1. Upper Afton Road - Project 86 -07 2. Birmingham /Frost Storm Sewer - Project 90 -08 H• UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Final Plat: Cave's Woods and Ponds Addition 2. City Hall Update 39 Falk Kennel License Review I. NEW BUSINESS 1. 1990 Budget: Reduced State Aid 2. Truth -in -sale of Housing (1st Reading) 3. Condor, West Storm Sewer Project 86 -01: Schedule Public Hearing 4• Seam Avenue, T.H. 61 to County Road D Project 88 -16: Schedule Public Hearing 50 Community Center Advisory Committee 6. Metro East Dues Increase 7. 1925 Arcade Street (Moris) J• VISITOR PRESENTATIONS K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS I. Skate Boarding /Roller Blading 2. Ballfields - School Districts 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Tax Exempt Financing: Maplewood Townhouses 2. 7 :10 P.M., House Moving: Radatz Avenue (Boryczka & Nicholson 3. 7:25 P.M., Easement Vacations: Gall Avenue (North Suburban Co.) 4. 7:35 P.M., Preliminary Plat: Flicek Addition 5. 8:00 P.M., 1860 Sterling Street (Welch) a. Variance b. Lot Division 6. 8:20 P.M., Code Amendment: Motor Fuel Station Ordinance lst ( Reading) 7. 8:30 P.M., On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License (Chili's M. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 14, 1990 and 4:30 P.M., Thursday, May 17, 1990 Council chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 90 -10 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M., by Mayor Anderson. B. ROLL CALL Norman G. Anderson, Mayor Present Gary W. Bastian, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -7 (April 9, 1990) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -7 (April 9, 1990) as submitted. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. Minutes of Special Meeting on April 12, 1990 Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Minutes of Special Meeting on April 12, 1990. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. 3. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -8 (April 23, 1990) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -8 (April 23, 1990) as corrected: Page 17, Item 1 -5 b Ayes - Zappa, not ROBsbach Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 4. Minutes of Special Meeting on April 23, 1990 Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Minutes of Special Meeting on April 23, 1990 as submitted. I 1 5 -14 -90 Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -9 (May 3, 1990) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Minutes of Meeting No. 90 -9 (Mav 3, 1990) as submitted. D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Anderson moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1. Tax Exempt Financing - Item 1 -14 2. Resolution Commending Two Police Officers - Item I -15 3. Holloway Avenue 4. Storm Sewer Financing 5. Ferndale Parking 6. 735 E. County Road B 7. Keller Parkway 8. White Bear Avenue Parade 9. Skateboarding /Roller Blading 10. Ballfields - School District Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - Mayor Anderson, Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach and Zappa Nay - Councilmember Bastian. S. CONSENT AGENDA Council removed items E -3 and E -6 to become Items I -16 and I -1 -7. Councilmember Zappa moved to table Item E -5 until further information can be obtained. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian and Zappa. Nays - Mayor Anderson, Councilmembers Juker and Rossbach. Motion defeated. Councilmember Juker moved, Seconded by Mayor Anderson, Ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda, Items 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 as submitted. 1. Approval of Claims ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 390,403.31 Checks #5392 - #5744 Dated 04 -12 -90 thru 04 -30 -90 2 5 -14 -90 S 163,060.90 Checks #4235 #4374 Dated 05 -14 -90 4 553.464.21 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL: $ 181,271.37 Payroll Checks S 35.571.43 Payroll Deductions $ 216,842.80 Total Payroll $ 770,307.01 GRAND TOTAL 2. Time Extension: Southwinds Apartment Preliminary Plat Approved aone -year time extension for the Southwinds Apartment Addition preliminary plat, subject to the original conditions of approval for the final plat. 3. Final Plat: Cave's Woods and Ponds Addition Discussed as item I -16 4. Proposed Settlement - Metro Supervisory Association Approved the Metro Supervisory Association settlement as presented. 5. July Fourth Fireworks Display Approved a budget transfer of $3,300.00 from the Contingency Account to finance the added cost of the July Fourth fireworks display. 6. Budget Transfer - City Clerk's Department Discussed as item I -17 7. Disposal of Old Financial Records Resolution No. 90 - 5 - 76 WHEREAS, M.S.A. 138.17 governs the destruction of City records; and WHEREAS, a list of records has been presented to the Council with a request in writing that destruction be approved by the Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. That the Finance Director is hereby directed to apply to the Minnesota State Historical Society for an order 3 5 -14 -90 authorizing destruction of the records as described in the attached list. 2. That upon approval by the State of the attached application, the Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to destroy the records listed. EA PRESENTATIONS 1. Mike Hinz, Gopher Disposal a. Mr. Hinz presented Council with a proposal regarding updating his recycling program. He reported that he will be picking up glass, plastic bottles, corrugated cardboard (if requested) and also presented new information on the collection of batteries. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to commend Mr. Hinz for his endeavors to making the recycling program work and that his Proposal be reviewed after 30 days. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Easement Vacation, 2983 Howard Street (Sauer) a. Mayor Anderson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of James A. and Kelly R. Sauer to vacate part of the utility easement that is under their house at 2983 Howard Street North. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. d. Gene Rosenbloom, Attorney representing the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Mayor Anderson called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Anderson closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 5 - 77 WHEREAS, James A. and Kelly R. Sauer initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following - described property: 4 5 -14 -90 S 1. 6" of the North 6' of the West 30' of the East 60' of Lot 2, Block 2, Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 4, Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said utility easement have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 2, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be approved. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on May 14, 1990, to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above - described utility easement, public interest in the property will accrue to Lot 2, Block 2, Robert Tilsen's Maplewood Heights No. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis that this easement segment is not needed for utilities. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. 2. 7:10 P.M., Mark's Nature Haven a. Preliminary Plat b. Rezoning (4 Votes) 1. Mayor Anderson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of pacesetter Property Management, Inc., for approval of a residential subdivision for 33 single dwelling lots and the City Staff is requesting a rezoning of the property from F -Farm residential to R -1 single dwelling residential. 2. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 3. Director of Community Development Olson presented the history of this proposal. 4. Mr. Greg Frank, representing the applicant, spoke on behalf of the proposal. 5. Mayor Anderson called for proponents. None were heard. 5 5 -14 -90 6. Mayor Anderson called for opponents. The following were heard: Ron Sokolik, 2371 Carver Avenue Larry Grand, 2405 Carver Avenue Mrs. Dahlin, 1234 Dorland Road Roger singer, 1250 Dorland Road 7. Mayor Anderson closed the public hearing. 8. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the June will intervene. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 3. 7:20 P.M., Given (Keller Club House) Liquor License a. Mayor Anderson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the request of Harry Given, Jr., for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license to be located at Keller club House, 2166 Maplewood Drive. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. C. Director of Public Safety Collins stated the investigation reports did not show anything that would prevent Mr. Given from being granted the liquor license. d. Mr. Harry Given, Jr., stated he will be at the location for more than 40 hours per week and that he does not have any interest in any other liquor license or establishment. e. Mayor Anderson called for proponents and opponents. None were heard. f. Mayor Anderson closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 -5 -78 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the City Council of the City of Maplewood on May 14th, 1990, an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Harry S. Given, Jr., dba Keller Club House, 2166 Maplewood Drive, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. G. AWARD OF BIDS 6 5 -14 -90 H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request From Richard Schreier a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mr. Richard Schreier requested the condition that the Conditional Use Permit for Chili's restaurant be reviewed after one year be waived as Chili's has canceled their lease if that condition remains. C. Councilmember Bastian moved that the Council waive the condition that the conditional use permit for Chili's be reviewed after one year. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - Mayor Anderson, Councilmembers Bastian, Juker and ROSabach. Nay - Councilmember Zappa. 2. Registered Land Survey: 1325 So. Century Avenue (Swenson) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Douglas Swenson, the applicant, explained his request. c. Councilmember Bastian moved approval of the registered land survey, subiect to the following conditions: 1. A site plan showing the septic systems for Tracts B and C must be submitted to the environmental health officer for his approval. The plan must show from for two systems. The environmental health officer shall determine the information to be shown on this plan. 2. The registered land survey must be recorded within one year of this approval, unless the City Council approves a time extension. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 3. 2272 E. Larpenteur Avenue a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson explained that Mr. Jeff Cody has requested that instead of putting 4 inch brick to replace the damaged brick on the house that was moved to 2272 E. Larpenteur, he be allowed to put brick sheeting known as Real Brick Facing. 7 5 -14 -90 C. Mr. Jeff Cody spoke on behalf of his request. d. Mr.- Don Wiener, 1814 N. McKnight _Road, expressed his opinion that 4 inch brick is better than brick facing. e. Councilmember Zappa moved to not deviate from the original conditions of when the moving of the four homes to the Southeast corner of McKnight Road and Larventeur was approved If this is not completed by July 15 1990, the City shall complete the homes and assess the owners Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach. Ayes - all. 4. Preliminary Plat Revision and Time Extension: Highwood 3rd Addition a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. C. Arnie Esterbrook, representing the developer, explained the proposal. d. Derrick Posse, Ultieg Engineers, spoke on behalf of the proposal. e. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve a one -year time extension for the Highwood Third Addition preliminary plat subiect to the following revisions to the conditions of approval for final plat approval: 1. Sterling Street must be realigned to the west, as determined by the City engineer, to increase the setback to the pipeline. The developer may acquire the additional right -of -way and construct the street or wait for the City to build it. The applicant may build a temporary Sterling Street between Valley View Avenue and Schaller Drive. This temporary street shall be used until the beginning of the construction of the permanent Sterling Street section. The temporary street shall be subject to the following conditions: a. The temporary street shall have a 24- foot -wide pavement width completely within the existing 30- foot wide right -of -way. b. The temporary street shall have a 6 -inch class 5 base with a 2 -inch bituminous wear course, or any alternative acceptable to the Engineer. The temporary street shall have no public utilities. The utilities shall be constructed as part of the permanent Sterling Street public improvement project. C. The three lots which face Sterling Street shall not be platted until the construction of the 8 5 -14 -94 permanent Sterling Street and the associated utilities. Until the contracts are signed for Sterling Street, no more than 1,000 feet of street and associated lots shall be platted from Valley View Avenue and proposed O'Day Street. The balance of the property may be platted as an outlot or left as unplatted property. 2. Conditions 2 through 12 remain unchanged. 13. Approval of a tree plan by the Director of Community Development. No grading or construction may begin nor will the City give final plat approval until the Director approves this plan. This plan must show the trees over eight inches in diameter that the developer intends to remove or keep.. This plan must also show where the developer will plant replacement trees. 14. The developer shall complete all site grading, unless it will be done with the construction of the streets. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. 5. Home Occupation 6. Motor Fuel Stations Councilmember Bastian moved to table Items 5 and 6 until a later date Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 7. Pending Planning Work and Budget Transfers a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Anderson moved to approve the following: 1. A budget transfer of $7800 from the Contingency Account to pay for additional work to complete the comprehensive plan. 2. Abudget transfer of $300 from the Contingency Account, to pay for three -ring, looseleaf notebooks for the Comprehensive Plan update. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. S. Purple Loosestrife Control a. Manager McGuire stated the Ramsey County Weed Inspector is requesting a contribution from the City to help control purple loosestrife. b. Councilmember Bastian moved to deny the request 9 5 -14 -90 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 9. Council Policies a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Anderson moved to refer this Item to the Legal Staff for clarification and report back to the Council June 11 1990 Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 10. Petition - Reduce Speed Limits: McKnight from Larpenteur to Holloway. a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mr. Donald Wiener, 1814 McKnight Road, stated he had sent a petition signed by the area residents requesting reduced speed . limit on McKnight Road. c. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 5 - 79 WHEREAS, reconstruction of McKnight Road from Larpenteur Avenue to Holloway Avenue will soon be complete; and WHEREAS, existing speed limits vary along McKnight Road; and WHEREAS, the fronting properties in this area are residential. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL that Ramsey County is requested to investigate establishing a 30 MPH speed limit on McKnight Road from Larpenteur Avenue to Holloway Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 11. Falk Kennel License Review a. Manager McGuire stated a request had been received from the area residents to table this until a representative could attend the meeting. b. Michael Perry, 379 Lark, asked to be heard as he had attending this meeting. He stated his opposition to a renewal of the kennel license. c. Councilmember Bastian moved to table this item until the May 31 1990 Meeting with the indication that it will be heard at that time Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - all. 10 5 -14 -90 12. City Hall Update a. Director of Public Works Haider updated the Council regarding the progress of the City Hall expansion construction. b. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 5 - 80 WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, has heretofore ordered Project 89 -16, City Hall Addition, and has entered into a construction contract, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract, in the amount of $1,072,155.66 be modified and designated as Project 89 -16 Change Order 5. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 5 in the amount of $4490 Credit. The city hall addition, Fund 405- 000 - 00047651, is hereby increased $10,510 by a transfer from the general fund contingency account. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. .ayor Anderson moved to waive the Rules of Procedures and extend the meeting until 11:00 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 13. Human Resource /Labor Negotiations and Developments. To be discussed in closed session after the Agenda is completed. 14. Tax Exempt Financing a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 90 - 5 - 81 RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI - FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, 11 5 -14 -90 CHAPTER 462C, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A HOUSING PROGRAM (THE MAPLEWOOD TOWNHOMES PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act ") confers upon cities, the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multi - family housing developments within the boundaries of the City; (b) The City has received from SB Multifamily Fund 11 Limited Partnership (the "Developer ") a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (c) The City desires to facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designed for occupancy by low -to- moderate income persons; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; (d) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development. The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 894,514 square foot multi- family rental housing development of approximately 176 town houses located at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road; in the City of Maplewood, and consists of the construction and equipping of buildings thereon which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to persons of low - to- moderate income within the community; (e) The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Project is economically more feasible; and (f) No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of 12 5 -14 -90 the acquisition and construction of multi - family rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in the principal and interest on the Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately $10,500,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition and construction of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(B) of the Bonds; and the City, acting by and through the City, hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 2. At the option of the City, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be consented to by the Developer. 3. On the basis of information available to the City it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multi - family housing development within the meaning of subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi - family rental housing opportunities to residents of low -to- moderate income of the City, and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the City. 4. The Project and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue bonds, is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to the approval of the financing program by the City, the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ( "MHFA"), subject to the City holding a public hearing and again granting preliminary approval after the public hearing and subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the project. 5. The City Staff is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a housing program for financing the project prepared in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 4620.03. 6. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the project is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer. 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to the Project and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the maturities, interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval. 13 5 -14 -90 8.. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to any liability thereon. The holder of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City, except such property as may be expressly pledged for the security of the Bonds. The Bonds shall recite in substance that Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The bonds shall not constitute a debt of the city within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 9. In anticipation of the approval by all necessary entities of the housing program and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 10. A public hearing on the Project and the Program will be held at the time and place set forth in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto as Exhibit A. The general nature of the Project and an estimate of the principal amount of Bonds to be issued to finance the Project are described in the attached form of Notice of Hearing. The City Clerk shall cause the notice of the hearing to be given one publication in the official newspaper of the City, which is a newspaper of general circulation available in the City, not less than 15 days nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 11. The Developer shall enter into various agreements with the City which shall impose the following restrictions on the Developer and the Project: a. Construction must begin within one year of preliminary approval on the Project (May 14, 1991). The City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is shown. b. Contracts entered into with contractors doing work on the Project shall provide that: (i) the contractor shall not discriminate in the hiring or firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. (ii) the contractor shall compensate employees with wages and financial remuneration as provided under the United States Code, 14 5 -14 -90 Section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.44. (iii) the contractor shall be required to employ Minnesota residents in at least 808 of the jobs created by the project; and, at least 60% of the group shall be residents of the seven - county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categories shall be determined as of the date of the Project's preliminary approval by the City Council (May 14, 1990). However, if the contractor can show that these quotas are not feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specific skills, the contractor may request the City Council for a release from the two residency requirements. The requirements shall continue for the duration of the construction project. (iv) the contractor shall be an active participant in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. (v) All provisions of these tax- exempt finance requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the Project. C. A written opinion, with supporting justification from a qualified expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application requesting tax - exempt mortgage financing to document that: (i) The Project will not adversely increase the vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the City that are existing or have received preliminary City approval over the metropolitan average. (ii) There is reasonable assurance that the Project will be able to comply with the federal, county and City low -to- moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. d. The bond indenture for the Bonds shall require: (i) The Developer to periodically certify to the City and trustee, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. The frequency of certification shall be determined on a case -by -case basis. (ii) The trustee is to inform the City of noncompliance trends with federal low -to- moderate income requirements. e. As a condition of approving the Project, a lump -sum fee at Bond closing or an annual fee over the life of the Bond will be required. The City reserves the right to choose the fee option that will be the most beneficial to the City. This choice will be made when the final resolution for the Project and the Bonds is adopted. Factors to be taken into account will include, but not be limited to: 15 5 -14 -90 (i) The size of the Bond issue. (ii) Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request. (iii) The number of requests (iv) Federal arbitrage considerations. f. The formula for each fee option is as follows: (i) Annual fee: (1) Full bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one - quarter of one percent of the Bond issue shall be paid at Bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (2) Prepayment of Bonds: The same as the full Bond maturity requirement, except if all of the outstanding Bonds are prepaid prior to final Bond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump -sum fee equal to the present value of the remaining annual fee payments, from the date of prepayment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (ii) Lump -sum fee: At Bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert, acceptable to the City. g. 208 of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of 508 or less of the metropolitan median income, unless the Developer elects to provide 408 of the Project units complying with the 608 of median income requirement; and i. 508 of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 1108 of the metropolitan median income. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Rossbach and Zappa Nays - Mayor Anderson, Councilmember Juker. 15. Resolution - Commending Police Officers a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 16 5- 14 -91: (i) The size of the Bond issue. (ii) Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request. (iii) The number of requests (iv) Federal arbitrage considerations. f. The formula for each fee option is as follows: (i) Annual fee: (1) Full bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one - quarter of one percent of the Bond issue shall be paid at Bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (2) Prepayment of Bonds: The same as the full Bond maturity requirement, except if all of the outstanding Bonds are prepaid prior to final Bond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump -sum fee equal to the present value of the remaining annual fee payments, from the date of prepayment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (ii) Lump -sum fee: At Bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert, acceptable to the City. g. 208 of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of 508 or less of the metropolitan median income, unless the Developer elects to provide 408 of the Project units complying with the 608 of median income requirement; and i. 508 of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 1108 of the metropolitan median income. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes - Councilmembers Bastian, Rossbach and Zappa Nays - Mayor Anderson, Councilmember Juker. 15. Resolution - Commending Police Officers a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Bastian introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 26 5 -14 -90 90 - 5 - 82 WHEREAS, on March 30, 1990, Maplewood Police Officer Steven Palma and North St. Paul Police Officer Michael Wolf and other officers pursued an armed suspect to the dead end of 40th Street and I -694 in Oakdale; and WHEREAS, the suspect drove into a yard at this location with Officers Palma and Wolf in pursuit; and WHEREAS, the suspect opened fire on these two officers; and WHEREAS, with disregard for their own safety, Officers Palma and Wolf returned the suspect's fire while attempting to maintain the safety of the resident and her three children; and WHEREAS, even though both officers were wounded in the exchange of gunfire, they maintained their pursuit of the suspect until relieved by other responding officers; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maplewood City Council commend both Officer Palma and Officer Wolf for their courageousness and the highly professional manner with which they conducted themselves during this dangerous and stressful incident; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL declares May 17, 1990, Steven Palma Day in the City of Maplewood. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. 16. Final Plat: Cave's Woods and Pond Second Addition a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until the May 31, 1990, Meeting and instructed staff to see that all conditions of the Preliminary Plat have been completed. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes - all. 17. Budget Transfers - City Clerk's Department a. Councilmember Juker instructed staff to investigate the possibility of 2 -way mirror glass partitions for the Clerk's office. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes - all. b. Councilmember Juker moved to approve a budget transfer of $8,885 from the Contingency Account for Purchase of the panels, furniture and equipment necessary for these additions and the rearrangement of the City Clerk /Deputy Registrar area. 17 5 -14 -9C Seconded by Mayor Anderson. J. VISITOR PRESENTATION None. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Holloway Avenue Ayes — all. a. Councilmember Rossbach asked what progress was being made regarding the Holloway Avenue vacation. b. Staff stated it was going before the Planning Commission. 2. Storm Sewer Financing a. Councilmember Rossbach questioned past practices regarding storm sewer financing. 3. Ferndale Street Parking a. Councilmember Rossbach stated Council had received a letter from a resident on Femdale, north of Upper Afton Road complaining about the "no parking" signs. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to waive the Rules of Procedures to take action on this matter. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. c. Mayor Anderson moved to remove the "No Parking" signs except the one on the northeast corner of Ferndale and Upper Afton. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — Mayor Anderson, Councilmembers Bastian, Rossbach and Zappa. Nay — Councilmember Joker. 4. 735 E. County Road B a. Councilmember Rossbach stated the resident at 735 E. County Road B is requesting a variance to construct a fence higher than normal to hide the mounds of dirt caused by the grading in the P.A.R.E. Addition. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to refer this request to staff and report back at next meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa. Ayes — all. 5. Keller Parkway 18 5 -14 -90 a. Mayor Anderson stated the residents in the Gervais Lake area on Keller Parkway are complaining about the parking of cars and boat trailers on that street after they launch the boats on the lake. b. Mayor Anderson referred this action to staff for investigation. Seconded by councihnember Bastian. Ayes — all. 6. White Bear Avenue Parade a. Mayor Anderson questioned if the Council was willing to participate in the White Bear Avenue Parade. b. Mayor Anderson moved to refer this matter to staff to obtain information regarding the parade. Seconded by Councilmember Bastian. Ayes — all. 7. Skateboarding/Roller Blading 8. Ballfrelds — School District a. Mayor Anderson moved to table these items until the meeting of May 31, 1990. Seconded by Councilmember Joker. Ayes — all. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATION None. Mayor Anderson recessed the meeting at 10:55 P.M., to go into closed session with the attorney to discuss I -13, Human Resource/Labor Negotiations and Developments. Mayor Anderson reconvened the regular meeting at 11:20 P.M. I. NEW BUSINESS 13. Human Resources/Labor Negotiations and Developments (Continued) a. Councilmember Bastian moved to direct the City Manager to develop pay ranges for all non -union positions, and to adjust the Human Resource Director's salary to $48,000.00 per year, effective May 16, 1990, and that the appropriate budget transfers be made. Seconded by Mayor Anderson. Ayes — Mayor Anderson, Councilmembers Bastian, Rossbach and Zappa. Nay — Councilmember Juker. 19 5 -14 -90 N. ADJOURNMENT 11:25 P.M. City Clerk 20 5 -14 -90 AGENDA REPORT TO: C Manager FROM: Finance Direc RE. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: May 22 Y 1990 AGENDA NO, E - Action by counoll Endorsed,,..„ Modified�,� Rejected.,.... Date It is recommended that the Council approve a p yment of the following g ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 517, 463.31 $ 127 848.30 $ 645,311.61 PAYROLL: $ 180,759.33 $ 35 815.34 $ 216,574.67 $ 861,886.28 Checks # thru # 5.814 Dated 5 -1 -90 thru 5-15-90 15 90 Checks # 6009 thru # 6167 Dated 5_28_90 Total per attached vouch er /check register Payroll Checks Payroll Deductions Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed-listing of these claims. DFF :lnb V c H u i� 0 5 81 9 11 A U E i- r! j. C, L I-, F 0 5k p 0 V 0 U H E R C H E C V [".'N D Cl R CHE 1% V E ND 0 f N U K- B. E R 'N U 11 R DA T 1\1 P, tri E DE S C: I P'l' I C"i N A M'k--§ I i • T " 7 4 5 261100 {. }b /01 :0 F I RIZI I M I N 'NE ZSF OJA F I C A PA A F: 1. E: 8, 4 8 5 ".3 F ED I N A P A y 2/ 0 9 1 F I C A C CIN -I'R I eU - 4 5 7 4 6 1 1 C 15-1 0 0 5/ l 1:1 0 A NT E R E-', J R Y 0 0 W N F E f='- i �j4O Oo 5747 790 0 b / 01 /,: 0 SCHU L-( Z LORf-ZA I NE C. LAND E A S F. 11 L N'll"Zo b 0 0 0 0 4 8 .9 4 0 y 5 5 0 Ob '01/90 WEHRMAN BERGLY 4 SSOC I FEc' INC f 3 N !:-'I U L. T I N 4 00 F E ES N (':1 '04 ■ 00 F E E'D U.? 0 Q 5 74 9 261100 Ow '01 `90 FI RT ryi I N N E"' OTA W A Ei E- f) U C.'-'r I C.1 N"S, 3 S 0 NS I N D L P'*f 0 F E. V E 1-4 ti F INC: PAY 110.60 5 71-:--1 1 5 0 10 0 O /0 1 /90 rt N %c_:j T A'T E C 0 'M rf 11 S r-3 I G E- R N C' TA X f A Y b 7 .5, 0 575 541400 06 /0 1 MINN. STA-fE' TREASURE: H N -fFZ VEH LIC: FEES 4.1 34-8 50 5 75 3 541 400 05 / Ol 9 0 M I N N 13 T'A'T E FR E A S ` ' it-Z E R R 1 v I c , 5) 7 5 4 4 8 0 0 0 b 0 2 L 0 F L E T C H L r t '-j R E A U R A 1`4 7 F 0 FZ E RV.1 C E.: 04 5- 7 5 , F 541400 0E, 0 U lyl I N N S (A7 E TfR E A 1:3 U F( ER M 1 R v E i C . 1 4 ft 0 F, 75 6 541400 0 b '0 2 9 MINN. STATE -rfd: U. AS U R E S 1' D Rl V L I C.- F F L . 49,�. 00 iii i 7 0 0 5 C ) - PALEN KIMF-.:ALL Cl--l. I'll A I NT. L I 1 2-- 9 . P* D 5',- :, 8 4 9 0 0 b /0 9 0 Sl-.f--'AUL- AREA CHAtl!:-'-[.H'-" U f- C 0 11 ME': R A T R V fl, A I N 'TRAVEi.. I" i"%' A I N 45.00 ,: 5 0 0 PCISI MAS'fE -R b . 0 6C) TOO 150 Cl 4 / -'1) /' =its P A N E R A M .96 7' r - -: 1 0 b 0 0 9 0 0 US R 0 U P H E A L'TH I N C • H C. I1 A D L.0 F' A Y -I.J .6. ICI f -1 E A L f H L J. "'E N f A L N 1 1 T7 4 '90 PHYSIC'.1AN-EJ i--iEAL- **FH PLAN FIC y MA. P ml F' I D 1-1) H E A L -T Fl L. i F" E J) N A 1 0.44- I N 'S C, IJ N -i -1:31 0 5 5 1 4 00 C) M A 1) 1 'S SO N N AT 1. Ct N A L L I FE L.T.D. 11 5 4 1 4( :)400 Ob/03/*9(.-) C L L. RK 0 F` D I or T f I C.- T C 0 U R C C: N - f Y 1) R I V I L C' FE A. 0 P� H CE C'. K.' A MOUNT J 7 ' 4 '%--:j 4 I b()O 00 4%-34 0 110 C& 0 1 348. 50 0 4 14,848.50 49,t". 00 9 *..- 0 0 00 430-96 1 11 5 75 0 0 1 'c3- 8, 3 114.00 6 VOUCHREG 051 9 0 1 22. 0 C I I' Y' 0 F 01 A t = ' L [--'W 0 D V0LJL`JiLR/CHLC-*K RLGISTER F-OR PERIOD 05 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR C H [-.'C. K VENDOR I TEM NUMBER NlJMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 5765 310900 05/03/90 GOVERNORS RE STAURANT WA13tES/PT TEMP 5766 541400 05/03/*.-)0 Iii INNU STATE FREA,"S1-,**(ER MTR VEH p. 6 7 541400 05/03/90 MININ. STATE TR1-.A%clURE_►:-Z Sl DRIV Ljr: FLF_f," 5768 161100 05/04/90 CRAGUN'S CiONFERENCE CENT; -Eh TRAVEL il. TRAIN 5769 190400 05/04/90 DE'PT, OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR I.IC 5770 541400 05/04/90 MINN. s•rATE TREASUREER ST DRIV LIC FEES 5771 541400 05/04/90 MINN. STATE TREAS'U RER M-TR VEH LIC-FEUS 5 7r .Z. 181855 05/07/90 DAVID, LOIN PROGRAM .,SLJPPl_11:--.S SUPPLIES JANITOR PROGRAM SUPPLIE- S TRAVEl- TRAIN P A M S Il P Pl.- I ES ROU %.J PROGRAM SUPPL I ES SUPPLIES OFFICE FEES FOR SERVICE PF,tOGFRAM SUPPI..IES TRAVEL & TRAIN TRAVEL & TRAIN .5773 541.400 05/07/90 MINN. STATE TREASURER M"f R VEH 1. IC f- EES 5774 541400 05/07/.-rO MINN STATE lREA,S)URER r ST D R I V L I C I • 5775 541400 05/08/90 MINN. STATE TREASURER MJR VEH LIC FEES 5776 541400 cis / 0 ED / 9 0 M. I NN STATE FREASURER ST DRIV LIC FEES 5777 520500 05/0 Mr,GUIRE, MICHAEL TRAVE'---[. & . TRAIN 577.8 91; 100 05/ 90 VIRTUE PRINTING' SUPPLIES OFF li.-E 5779 890900 0!_' /08I 9 Cy U-S.WEST COMMUNICAT IONS T F- I f e p V T E L E r-` H C, N E TELE PH ONE -10 NE TELEPI TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TE L E P H C) N E TEL E P H ID N f.. T E L E P H ON E T E L E P H 0 N .T. TELE PH ONE 1 1 , lim AMOUN 15'? 00 9 1 50 4 4 w 0 Q 381 0 0 '(39 ■ 50 !�195 10 1 5.67 5 - 6 'i ED. 6 . 5 () 1.75 4.18 4.78 3.93 8.39 2. 5 7. 20.150 12 500 42- . F 0 3 5 0 til 9 . 00 34 . 00 19563.61 50 . 9 ') 50 . 95 5 0 11-8.10 I 156. 4 4 8 7v 5 4 8 ■ "'F5 4 8 � 5 4 8 7 LJ 4 'D, 7 5 4 8 7 ',) .90 F'A G E 2 CHECK AMOUNT 9,881.50 414.50 294.00 Q 3 G.' I ■ 00 do 119595.10 5 0 0. '703 . 50 6 97 C-2 . 10 519.00 34.00 T 6 3 . 53- VOUCHi-ii 'Gi 05/1G.1/90 OF FI-1 R P 6� 1. 0D VOLICHER/ CHECK VENDOR C V END OR N U M 1--.'�E R I E DA TE N J�, M E 17 Ell J ESCI`iPTION A ly! f U N T TE L E P H ON f.- TELEPHONE 54-65 T E L E P H 0 N L. 5 4 b TE L E f" 1-1 F-I N E 54.65 T E L E PH 0 N L. 6 9 .7' TE L E P H N E 4 fELEPHONE 54 r C-5 TE L E P N E 4.9-62- TE L E P H 13 N L 5 T E L E P 1-1 1--1 NE 7 7 -f* E L E P H C., N 5 3p 9 0 T ELE F"HONE 67-40 TELEPH ONL 5 0 TELE PI-ICINE 19-54 TELEPHONE 47.40 Ill .74 ff, 7 -13 0 0 10 4 5 05/08/90 A.T. T. COMMU'NI CATIONS C TELEPHONE: 1 T E L E P 11-i C., N E 17 1 77 TELEPHNE' O 10.61 T E L E P H 0 N E .47 TELEPHONE: 1 .7Z TELEPlif)NE 4 .00 7 . 00 5781 240725 . 0 5 0 8 9 0 EM PLOYEE B-ENEFIT PLAW.:3 Df.-.P W/ PAY A G I 1 I boo. 00 5782 541 40 0 05/0 MINN. STATE TREASURER - MOTOR Vti. L. I ' 1 :- 578 3 541400 05r09/9D M .1 NN ES T A --f f.-- U R 1'. R T R UA f-i SIATE DR-I'VERr b 07 50 5784 83 0 �351 0 5 4) 9 / 9 0 SOLNUSKY, GEOR"GE AME. I C 5 7 Gn, 5 6 (;, 7 J 0 Ob/09/90 NORTHERN STA""ErS PC.tW(.- U J 1 L I T I E:'- 'S 7 9 1 _J -b 3 3 ti ? ' 05/09/90 HARTFORD, P. FLI.-IR EN r- E Ia L A N D E A,-j 'MEN T ~' 7'-'7 5 3 1 C". 5 0 Ob/09/90 M E'-I'ft'() W A STE C 0 N T ► 1. C 0 ffl lyl I.-W A G E T R L AT111 N 5 t '= ' 8 140400 05/10/90 CLERK OF DI'STRICT COURT CNTY 51-89 511010 Ob/10/9( MARKETING REC.-REATION CLA-D,JES A 11q B. R E F d WD 130.00 5 T 9 0 Z 0 o c) 0 0 5 / 10 / 9 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY C 0 NIT f"%'A C'f PY M 579 1 5414.00 05/10/90 MINN. 5TATE RE-Ar;,-;URE.R MQ'f'1- VEH 1.1C. 5792 4 14 0 0 05/10/90 MINN. SfATE IREASJURER f 16 3 4 STATE 1`R1V-':.:.RS tfl o ■ 0 o 579 -22' 7 2 P L) B- t. I C. E M i" L I'.) Y E. E P Ei- PE R A T R I B ': - 4 5 F- A G E C H E C' K AMOUNT 4lb59.93 191.3 1 to 07 .50 21 0. i0 P: -. 0 0 18. 1 0 91 1 Z 130.00 9() . 0 0 v I o 16,651-'34 Z`3 9 07 8 . Z 8 VOUCHREG C .1 Y, 05/ 18 /90 11 VOUCH•R/CHECK REGIS-TER FOR PER10D 05 VOUCHER/ PAGE 4 CHECK VI:NDOR. C H E C. K VENDOR NUMBER N I J M'(7-'E R 1) A T'E NAME 4.17 1 � N D C. R I PT 10 N 5794 661750 05/10/90 NORTHERN STAT'ES POWER UlAll- 1600 MYRTI.L 87 10 UTIL *.(--'►---,00 7TH ST 83.57 114.13 UTIL 510 CE: 'N-fURY 69-64 U 1' I L I ti 0 1 GE N E V A 15. 78 U I L 18 • _p' '-1 LARP 466.74 57.96 UTI A 7 6 W H B 60-36 u *r I L 1850 C 0 R D 1-.'.'E 972.01 1 4 1 4.---'- . 0 8 U TIL CONWAY 1 1 8`300 . 99 1.03 U T I L 61'c-'.' FARR'E*L.L. LJ 1* 1 L 6 18 FARRE L I 662.00 11,081.40 11,081.40 U'F I L 1 940 NO *T PAUL 688.50 688.50 U T I L L- 7. H S "T E 114.54 UTIL 2659 7TH ST 8,114-54 37,340-93 UTIL :: i:.5 9 'TT H S T 5795 661 755 05/11/90 NORTHER ST*A-r'ES POWER U [* 1'r I$:. 48 .30 • 48.30 u'r I L I T I E'S 5796 742900 05/10/90 RAY' DAVIS ',3ONS SUPPL.IES -JANI'r'OR 5797 190400 .05/110/90 DEPT. OF NAT URAL RE.SOURSES DNR LIC FILES 5798 541400 05/11/90 MINN. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH L.IC FEES 5799 541400 05/11/90 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRIV t. I C FEES 5800 ..261100 -05/14/90 FIRST.MINNESOTA F.I.C. A. PAY 113.59 %..89.80 jr FED INC TA,%•'% PAY .94 FICA CON'TRIB 5801 460520 05/14/90 LEAOUE OF MN CITIES TRAVEL I TRAIN A/R MISC 5802 46('535 05/14/5110 I-EAGUE OF MN CITIES/DCVB A/R MISC 5803 460540. LEAGUE OF MN HOUSING -BUREAU TRAVEL. & TRAIN A/R M1 SC 5804 4 60 5 4 0 05/14/90 LEAGUE OF MN HOUSING BUREAU TRAVEL & TRAIN 5805 661750 NORTHERN ,STATES POWER Ul" I L 190*2 COROB 5 (5 STI L L. W A T* ER LJ T I L 16 9 5 E U T I L 1695 B, E' El-.': UTIL 199ff, COPE AVE 5806 661750 05/14/90 NORTHERN STA-r*ES POWC:R tJTll- OJ)AY U'F I L '707' UTIL I ff", 4 0 C, 0 R f) C UT I L 191t, MAN"I'(.',N L.1 I'l L '2` 5 5 R' I P Y PAGE 4 CHECK A MIOU N T AMOUNT 4.17 � N 74 . 74 15 r E, "I' 87 10 83.57 114.13 69-64 7.06 15. 78 466.74 57.96 60-36 112 . 21 5 972.01 1 4 1 4.---'- . 0 8 1 1 8`300 . 99 1.03 8 5 0 3 662,00 662.00 11,081.40 11,081.40 11C, 688.50 688.50 114.54 1.1.1 - 85 8,114-54 37,340-93 480.00 84.00 5.:54 48 .30 • 48.30 403.20 --33 r 6 436.80 120.00 120.00 15015.77 9 922-14 305.01 113.59 %..89.80 jr .94 4 VOUCHREG CHECK A t?l C-1 U N'T A M 0 U N T* 4 . 1 i 5 / 9 o I - 8 6 C I T Y O F lyl A W C t cl v 15 6 . Z 7 4 E ., 1 .21* 1 - 5 10 8 . 1-13-1. FOR PLf-(lJ.-)D o r, VOUCHER/ 49. 154 - 72 C. H E C K V Ell DO R CHi. Cif* VENDOR 1 379 4 N U M F-.', E R N U M f."" E R D 7 "E NAME I T F I'l 573-50 1-9Z.E; . 5,0 ,18 4 . 0 0 1) E ES C, R i P'f' I Cl N 6.82 7 . UTIL 2501- LONDIN 63 .7*4 6.78 U T I L 2 1 L. I N W 0 0 1) Z . 07 u'r I L 1 243 BILAIJ bl 0 f_.. U TIL .1 1 W y 6 7 G3 9 4 U *r I L 16 9'c: P:ARr*WAY DR L 69 . 55, 110 . 0 U TIL I 'T 7-5 C-,- : A 11 8.59 u*rlL 17 b I ARCADE 68 . I E; 37 U T I L I W1+8' ". A V 1 7 7 3 7 E- 1•.00 UTI W H B- 1:A 0 . 0 0 UTIL 4:464 W H B- 1. A V U'F I L 9 81. WI - Il --- j - V U T I L t, W A id UTIL 9 9 1 W H F---- E A V 5 8 C) 7 .. - - I 5'0100 - - C, .0 5 14 9 0 M TA E C. Q M M I o T .5 INC TAX PAY 5808 541400 0 b 1 9 0 M I ININ S TA -f F.* r R L'A U R f. -f US M R V E H L. I c - 5 -13 0 9 541400 05/14/90 MINN. S'f* A I'E J'R E A U R E R %S) DRIV LIC. 58 10 . ...... -54 140 -- - - - 05 15 /90 M.1 N N, S T A T F-.* T R E A SLl R f;- R 5.131 1 54.1400 05 15,/q M I N N ■ US f 11 fR E A S Ul R E R c*f DRIV LIC FE IES 5 -131 1 661750 Ob 15 9 0 NORTHERN STAI'[-.S% pOWj:.F( Uy It- 6 .3 -T E R L • N U T I L 1 5 C. 0, U I L 1 D F. 0 N 1 Ul*lL 1 is" 11 t, f V U *F I L 1 750 AD S: L PH Ll,:,' A R P U T I L 1845 PR O.:: l P U 1 0 1 A RC ADE U'U L 0 () to L-.' D Gi f-- R''T'L-) N U T'l L l 9 M A LJTJ L A T 1. A 1141-f IC. U'T I L 1 4 4 j) U T I L 1 4 It", ARCADE: u'r I L 10,;t C 0 F(j C . UTIL (4 1 L. A f'%' P U T I L 474 UTIL 140 E L L R U T I L 2.2." b 0 M C. M E:.'N I �'Oi Y UTI 1282 E SHOR I I U'r I L 1 035 1. A K" E W L-j 0 D 3 54090t) 151 9 Oil NN. G- F A. 'RAVEL T RA VEL - 17 R " N A I A I N 5814 8402.90 .161 9 0 '..:;T ■ t-"ALJL AREA CHAMBER OF CO tai V 1* R A V E L 'E' & ti A I N PAGE 5 CHECK A t?l C-1 U N'T A M 0 U N T* 4 . 1 2.94 - 8 6 15 6 . Z 7 4 I 10 . Il 1 .21* 1 - 5 10 8 . 1-13-1. 78-69 49. 154 - 72 15 1 147.73 1 379 4 89563.66 8,1563.66 1 i 1 4 -,:� 2- . to 0 11,493.50 573.510 573-50 1-9Z.E; . 5,0 ,18 4 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 6.82 7 . I . 1.5 63 .7*4 6.78 Z . 07 6 7; bl 0 f_.. 6 7 G3 9 4 9 . 817 L 69 . 55, 110 . 0 8.59 15 . 7 b 68 . I E; 37 1 7 7 3 7 E- 1•.00 0 . 0 0 VOUCHREG PAGE 6 05/ 1;/90 11 :ZQ .1 C. -1 Y F 11 A P L L W Q C) D CHECK A M 0 U N T V0LJCl-lER/(*HECK G I STE I 14.88 FOR PERILDD 0 P.Jt VOUCHER/ CIO C: H E C •-.*. VENDOR C H LC: fo,* VENDOR NUMBER N U M .0'E R D A TE N A M, E I T E m DES C13 I PT 10N 6009 010465 05/28/90 A. T. T. COMMUNICATIONS 40 20 . 1Z 0 TELEPHONE 2 - TELEPHONE 40 15.83 TE L E P H 0 N E 26.92 `5 55 TELEPHONE 19.7 TEL E PI-1 ONE 34-94 TELEPHONE"' .6010 010501 05/28/90 ABRA, INC. A/R • 48.69 REPAIR MAIN-f VEHICLE 601.1 0106, 5 0 5 8 90 ACE HARDWARE M AIN T, MA R I A L I AL 9.84 SUPPLIE S Of-'f*-IC 21.19 SMALL T001-S 10.96 MAINT MATERIAL 52. - 3 7 18.13 ci.:J'U PP L I E!:3 LJ I P ME. NT 16.61 �UPPLIES JANITOR 543 5 1 MAINT MATf-RIAL 1 5)` . 50 19.50 90.00 SUPPLIES E-QUIPMENT 6i) =,.7 603.75 PROGRAM SJUPPLIES 5 . 0 0 SUPPLIES E.QUIPMI'.*NT 492. . 00 67 r 00 MAINE MA]"ERIAL 4.50 MAINT MATERIAL. 46.16 MAINE MATERIAL 6 1 . Z" SUPPLIE'S JANITOR 9(. MAINT MATRIAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINT MATERIAL MAINT MATT Z F IAL ' SUPPLIES JANIT-OR MAINT MATERIAL. MAINT MATERIAL. MAINT MAIERIAL REPAIR i. MAINT/E 601 020400 05 2 8 0 AI R SIGNALI-NC OUTSIDE RENI' E 6013 02383 ALPHA COMPUTl-ERS, INC. REPAIRS • MI- NCE/E 6014 0 2 1 1 CR 5 0 5 11.". • / 9 0 AME- -Rlr:AN F-ENGINFiERING TES"FINC.-i 1:'NGlNE.f:Rjj,jCi F:EE�73 6015 0 2 1 0 5 2 8 / 9 0 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION M I. M E RS H I p I Iff E M L-'.'E R SH I P 6016 030400 0 5 /�':; 9 0 ANDERSON, CAROLE T RAV EL VL-- ALLO tai A �- Ol 7 040700 0 5 j '° ;_ 9 0 J ARDEN SH�J-ZEVIEW HOSPITAL K-9 -i-'ARE 6018 0 {.x'115 0 5 14,* 8 0 ARNIALIr-3 AUTO SERVICE MAJJq-f/V R E PA I R MA INT/ V PAGE 6 I E 11 CHECK A M 0 U N T A MO U NT 14.88 2.46 CIO 13.79 6.38 go:"6 7 5 5 11557.85 4 0 1 9 7 5 40 20 . 1Z 0 2 - 5 2-- a C', 6 40 15.83 26.92 `5 55 19.7 50.63 34-94 10.92 10.99 • 48.69 17 3 20.57 9.84 21.19 7 . 4Z 10.96 52. - 3 7 18.13 16.61 40.36 543 5 1 1 5)` . 50 19.50 90.00 90.00 6i) =,.7 603.75 5 . 0 0 492. . 00 67 r 00 4.50 46.16 6 1 . Z" 9(. I -I F. m A Il 0 U N T 1.31 .70 7U.oU 13-16 13.70 1 7 4 7 L62.0o 11 =_ -It . 5b 1 1';. 7.00 14.04. 60.00 08 46 12.12 6.•8 164 6-7 4 5 49-40 .90 100 4 00 14 . 1, 0 19.(.-)o 6 6 0 0 0 �J90 .76 P A u'l F 7 C H E C. K A M 0 LJ N T *'.'I' I .70 70.00 78.74 '34 Ito " - 5 5 12.00 1 3.70 Z 1 .04 13 4 Z 1 6 4 7 4 5 49.40 17 :. 100. 600, 19.00 66-3 . 00 *3• . 20 tfl' 4 0 -, 76 V 0 u tZ. 0 F M T E V 0 U C. HE R FOR PE I OD C HE N U M I'.'. E R V E N D C., R CH E: -' K VENDOR N U M -*8' E R D A I' E NA 6019 041000 0 819 0 ARNI.-IL-D DAVID Ij I P ! N 602 - U Iq 1 F'OR M - Eo' C L 0 T H i c i 4 Z 6 0 0 S Q F M TRAVEL TRAINING b 061900 0 fj 9 0 [-.'A'I**I'ERY TIRE WARI-.*HjDU S CS u P p L. I I.-: VE i-i I C LE SUPPL I Ej--. c. L ci ViEh" CL-E SU P L 1 E7 '.::; *- 'LE I VE -11 C. I 2 SUPPL I ES VEHICLL 0 Z:-/ 9 0 )--.'ESI- LOCKiNG SY'I:)T*EMII..:J' OF FAINT MATERIAL 6023 - 0 0 10 0 0 5 ZEE: IIAIN"f' MA-I*EF.,IIAL 9 0 BJERKNESS, MARGARET 6 0 080300 0 5 'P PRf-IGRAM REG Ba L A C KS' H 0 TO la R A P H Y SUPPL I ES B L. A C. KS T R A V E L T R AIN 6 0 6 0; -.3 05,/28/ B 0 A R)) VEHICL-E At LOW JF WATI�R N U TIL IT IES u L I T lk. c UT IL IT ii.z U rl L 11- IES 'j UTILi*riL_s UT I L I T I E-13 6 0 22 7 101400 05 9 0 BUILDERS o"QUARE 6 0 1 0 05/' TV j IM A LL T () 0 L. S NORTH CENIR-AL. 05/28/ 90 CARL-SON fR(J E VALUE fibw. 6030 13 0 0 0 05/28/90 I C H A FE I N M A I NT I.--. N A N C 1:-. M A "fir.-E. R I A L P U B'L. I zSH .1 Iq G c. 13 1 0 5 9 CHIF EWA F-RiNG(:� F IJ 1:, 1., Ic 603-7- 5 9 0 C I P H [-:'R y "o. %.J Er" LU I P M j ." iq `t CIFf L: 1 4()§:."05 9 U CL-(.--AN S.11"EP RUGS I-EE 0:D4 15,003o 9 7 F EES FOR fi - k -V . C .- f CODE REPOR-TER 6035 15017( .-) 0 El 9 0. C-01-L. INS E L E C: I R IC S 0 8 ILI- a 6 0 3 61. 151 550 0 5 9 0 CONGREGATE RI.FIAI PIA I Iv `i ! �. DINING 6037 15 0 8 9 C 1-1 p y D 1.) P I- i C. A "I I I NG T R A V E L 83, RA I N PROD" DLJI ACA .1 N( T' R E P A I f;' *;-�,'- M A I Ni f I -I F. m A Il 0 U N T 1.31 .70 7U.oU 13-16 13.70 1 7 4 7 L62.0o 11 =_ -It . 5b 1 1';. 7.00 14.04. 60.00 08 46 12.12 6.•8 164 6-7 4 5 49-40 .90 100 4 00 14 . 1, 0 19.(.-)o 6 6 0 0 0 �J90 .76 P A u'l F 7 C H E C. K A M 0 LJ N T *'.'I' I .70 70.00 78.74 '34 Ito " - 5 5 12.00 1 3.70 Z 1 .04 13 4 Z 1 6 4 7 4 5 49.40 17 :. 100. 600, 19.00 66-3 . 00 *3• . 20 tfl' 4 0 -, 76 VOUCIAREG 05/18/90 C C-11 Y O OF MAPLLWOOD V 0 LJ C. H E R 1-i I:' C, I,- . !1 G I ri; TE R FOR PFRIOD 05 VOUCHER/ CHECK V VENDOR H H L C K V V END UR NUMB'ER N N U Mi.**.' E R D DATE N N A E D DE G C R I PT 10 N 6038 1 1 0 t" 8 90 C CO F`Y EQ Ll I PMEN• INC: r "UPPLIES O r " OFFICE - 0 9 0 5 9 0 C CURRENTECH CLIMPUTER C E N I EQUIPMENT OTHER E Q Ll I P 11 1.1'-N -1 0 T 1-1 fl*'R 6040 1 180 DAL.CO SUPf"LIE'S JANITOR SUP'P'LIES JANITOR 6041 1 180900 0 05/28/90 D DALEY, PAT F F E -S F () rR S R V I C E 6042 1 181300 0 05/28/90 D DA_1A DISPATCH D DI:LIVERY SERVICE. 6 0 4 2 2 0 0 E'll 8 0 0 Z DIST. 624 FOOD S ERVICE T TRAVEL TR A I N .6044 2 2 3 0 44R2 5 0 05/28/90 E E. K. QUEVIL PROk:l 6045 2 2 500 05/28/90 E EAST COUNTY LINE F F"T. T TRAVEL. TRAINING 6046 2 230700 0 05/28/'* 90 E EAST SIDE G.T.C. S S L) VP t. I E S VEHICLE 6047 2 230900 0 05/28/90 E EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY S SLJPPLIE'Izj OFFICE SUPPLIES Of- F I C E S U P P L. I rE S OFFICE UPP L I E ot- 0 FF I C. E SU P P L I C: S OFFICE S SUPPLIES OF F I C E SUPPLIES OFFICE S U P P L I E r.% S OF F I C E DUPLICATING C0!__%TS DUPLICATING COS S' DUPLICATING C01' 3p T ; . PAGE 8 17 r. M C H E C f '. * AMOUNT AMOUNT 6 1 - .2-f 7' 6 1 7 6 3 1 M 7 6 4 0 0 *7 4 7 6 1 e2l 1 9 1 _*--Is • 18.00 1 9 9 3 504.00 04.00 0.00 5 0 2 . 5 0 341.75 341.75 84.00 84.00 15.60 15.60 3 2: 8. 03 14. 6.13 9.26 1.64 34.66 4 8 . E3. 9 1 Z 4 .158.45 2`57 55 0 � 15' 0 �7'0 00 4. 20.00 63.60 140.00 140.00 0 0 1 z 0 0 0 9 (:.47 3.1 4 0 0 6 0 4 9 ZI 5 VOUCHREG CHECK A 1`10 U N'T AMOUNT 67.00 05/18/90 3.13.00 105.00 i *:L" 0 . 0 0 C I 'Jr Y C1 F lyl A P i. W 0 I'D D 74.1 2 o • o 0 67.42 IS TER" 43.81 Z4.2`b FOR PERIOD 05 VOUCHER/ 33 69.8z Z. CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR NUMBER N U M -0- E R D A T' E-* NAME 7.60 019 9' a 89-.98 19 3 1) E ':-:) C: R I PT 10 N 6054 2 -'30 4 4U Ob/28/90 FORTMLYER LANG PRIN-IERS' PROEIRAM %c."UPPLIES' PROGRAM SUPPLIES 6055 280451 05/28/90 - FOSS, JAN' FEES FOR SERVICE 6.056 0 0 to 0 0 5 Z8 9 0 Ci ',71 K 3 E R V I C. E 'S U N I F 0 R M S UN I F OR Ifl,`3 ... C L. T H I N U N I F 0 R M CL Of H I N G UN I FOR ms C L 0 TH U N I F j..i R MS C: L f--1 f H I N G U N I F 0 R 1y18:.-.*-* C L 0f H .1 N E, U N I F0. R M S L . 0 r jj 11 Ci U N I F 0 fN`1v1,,:* C L 0 -f HIND U N I FO R V1 S) C L 0 T H I N G U N I F Q R l-y1,r-.' CL C1 T H IN UNIFORMS CL01"HING L) N i F 0 R IyIS C L OT H .1 N 6 U N I F 0 R I I I : C. L 0 T H I N G UNIFORM S C L 0 T Fi A N UNIFORMS C L OT I-I I N G U N I F 01'(11 S C L 0 TH I N 6; 6057 3004 G.A■B. BUSINESS E. R V I C E JUDGEMENTS 6058 301240 05/28/90 GARRY, WILLIAM LINIF' ORMS CLOTHING 6 0 5 9. 3 0 Z 4 5 05/Z8/90 GERMAIN, UNIFORMS CLQ'fH 6060 3 0 6 0 0 Ob /2'8 9 0 GLADSTONE. LUME.-L.R MART. M A I N T M A Tt"R I A L j SU P P L ES E Q U I f1yt N T S-UPPLIES . 1. EQUIPMENT 6061 3203*-`5 0 51 /Z8./90 of ANs.4ANET PROGRAM SJUPPLIES VEHICLE A'[-LOWAN(.'j:. 606 2 400 H A R M 0 N G L A S R U f-" A I R MA IN f/ V REPAIR I N1 /L 6063 3 0 4 2-* 3 HAkit INS, RI)BERTA R 0 G R A M i - I SfR A VI Q N 6064 3 5U 70 0 0 b / '' 8 9 0 H I RSHF: I EL Ds S LI P P L I E S' E. Q U 11:1, m LN) SUPPLIES E Q U I P M N'f 6065 370100 9 H LJ'*f'C H I _N' 0.0,0 N s A 14 N PR06PAAM U P P U I E s 150661 3804bO 0 b 8/ 9 0 I.P.C. PR I N -f I N E%j SUf"i"LIES OFF- ICE 6-067 391500 0 5 28/ 9 0 ! ICI TLERNATIONAL C(*-1N1- 6068 4 0 02". 0 0 9 0 is THOMAS P R(1(.3 R'A M S U 1" P L I E S PA6E 9 I T E C M CHECK A 1`10 U N'T AMOUNT 67.00 3.13.00 105.00 i *:L" 0 . 0 0 1'.0.00 74.1 2 o • o 0 67.42 45.81 43.81 34 30 3 4 23 0 34.30 19.47 19.47 19.47 19.47 5 3 • 181 5 8. 6 54.61 4 -7 11916.61 11916.61 ZO.00 2 o • o 0 51--'-.00 16 . 9;---: Z4.2`b 97-23 40.4• 33 69.8z Z. 43 . tiO 4--14.75 0 0 79 93 6. I 7.60 019 9' a 89-.98 19 3 19.23 Lb r 00 45.00 VOUCHREG C' I T* Y Q F ryl A P L L-:' Vi 1*3 0 D I� 0 5 9 0 11 IZ" 0 V L i H L I i, R E.' c" i I S" T E f F'A G E I ti VOUCHER/ r,.-'H E (.-.'K V 1: N D 0 R' C H E C K '"o V END OR N U M E-'. E R N 1 Pl E..`- rE tr'*%- 1) A I- E N M E J) E S C R I PT I N C H E C: K A M U N f 14 M 0 U N T PROGRAM SUPPLIES .;59-40 944.40 6069 401'%-00 C) 5 0 JIM HATCH SALIEr's "'i M A L L T , 0 Cl o" 6 07 0 4 0 1 F5!') 0 0 5 8 0 JOHN D SIELLS -3-- A 17i REPAIRr' C, IN 4 0 1 00 05/28/90 Jl--'LLY'S, INC. • R A M "'.3 U P P L. I E S "T I . 0 18.70 0 7 oo-I.- 401 885 0 5 S2� 8 J OHN %cif-'IN C ONI N'OLS I Nis--' a ! F'' t�' I T E ti JANITI.")R 75 . 00 7 5 . 00 6 7'.-:" 4 1.0150 05/Z.1 /90 K.P.M.G. F_'EAT MARWICK MAIN VEES FOR 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 r 4 410400 0 b ,:.8/ KAIH HEATING LIPPLIE`- � JANITOR z_7 0 7 0 0 6075 4 3 O,C-:" 0 0 0 5 1,--) 0 KO[--'.ESH AS PROGRAM 'Er LJ P P 1 '7 L 5 5 I S R 0 G R A lyl S U P PL I E 15 75 P R 0 G f-%"A M U f P 1. 1. i..09 40 782.70 6-076 440370 05/28/90 KURKO'r"KI, CHERRYL PROGRAM REG FEES 1 0 0 1 Z 0 0 6077 4519,30 5 / Z* 8 / 9 0 LAS SANA PROGRAM S LJ P P I.- I 1E S 31.46 31.46 his r 8 4 6050:0 ob 1 LEAGUE OF MN C 11*1 ES TR AVE L ;&- T Z, .00 39.00 0 7 9 4 6 t, 7 5 05/28/90 LEE COLLINS LIMITE'D LIFFICE 61 6 Z' 61.62 6 0 8'0 4 6 1 w 0 0 -"8/ 9 0 0 5 14''. L E - 'L.IE PAPER' K 0 D A fo* SUP PL I ES 1 19 40 1-.*,' 0 D A K U P P I.- I E S 2 0 9 K DA K SUP F"L I ES 91 K D A K S P L I E. S LJ F 1 37 . 77 KODAK SUP PL I ES 24.61 KO D A K SUPPI.. IES KODAK S U f--) Pl. I E S 3 3 4.43 1,446.00 6010-11 4 0'41 0 0 5 ' :_:,O L tj G E R L U M -E-,E R (_e'0 M A I NT M A T 'c t; I A L *16 5 0 rl A 1 N'r MAI ER I AL 1:: rl A I NT M ATE R I A L 36.14 M A I N T MAI ER I AL 3 1 9 M A INT M A R I A L .. im A I N T M A I 1.-R 1 A L 18 .; ",5 M A I NT V1 A R I A L ( 1 .7:3, M A I N T MAT LR I AL 5f.") 5 1 MAI NT M A T I A L 27. MAI NTENANCli MA"11.'fA'1Al. 6'.--./ 0 . 0 0 6 2f. 5 1 5 051 0 MACHO PR(_lDLJ(* TIS INC . 5 0 6083 5 11"50 0 5 2, M A I N L. U M L s U rr",i::! L I M L W 5.'_s 5' 1 V 0 U C Fl R`E G F . h A i v -i L T r L .1 ':zi L rt F 0 R F'E f-*k' 10 D V 0 U C H E R CHEC V F- N D 0 R C H L K V E D 0 R NUMBER NUMBERR DA TE NAME D`E C. R I F-1 T 1:0N S U P P L I E IS I P 11 E- N T S U PP L I E U 1 111 C NT LJ P P L. I k E. Q LJ I P M E W I 60 cc 5 1 0 05 90 MARTINI�AU I N c P LJB L I'-`h 1* N P U 0- L I H I N 0'---, 5 5 116" 0 0 0 5 i 2- 9 0 MA"YS CORP T R IH P A I R tyl A I N T P tf N f Q [j 6 0 6 5 .2' 0 4 8 --D 0 b 9 0 M C. D N 0 LJ (-.i H D L. RA Ri'.'C REG F-EL,- r_, i , : 7 5 20 b 0 t:x �� a ` w , '90 rfl.C6'LJIRE tll(-. -llAEL 6U 8 5C•;0 `i 10 Ott /48/90 MiEN A R I NC M Al N T E N A N C L llAl.N MATCHRIAL 6 0 .8' 9 5:-31 0 F) 9 0 ME**I'I-'C) SALES 11'4' 609 o 5 4 0 62-'el 5 05/1-6/90 MIDWEST AN11MAL SERVICE L' E 'S Of � `V 1 C. E 6091 5 4 0 &Z5 0 51 8 9 0 MI DWf:- Sl GAN('-$ I NVE%31T ASSN T RAV&.L. TRA I r v 1 N G 6092 540350 05/ =. / ',Cy Ml DWE'ST SIREN SJERVI CE RE PA I R MA IN F/E 6093 X 54078Z.0 05/28/900 MAINN COMM 0LJTLjlDk:' RENTAL. 6094 5 =-T5 05 2 G. 9 0 MINN, DEPT -OF PUBLIC SAFE"I"Y - 11J"SIDE WNT EQUIP OUTSIDE RENT EQUIF" r=''- } ':'5 54190C) 0 5 90 MINNE'%:-:;OTA !-.*" L Uk'-- Pt'N'i N T LJ P t L. E F U I M E N •0•6 550600 Ob/Z8/90 MN DEPLITY RE� 1 3, 1 %r:i'-f'R A R A S Si 0 C 6 0 9 7 10 1 0 05 90 0 MULVANEY I DENN %J UNif C. L. 0* F H 9 10 A. 0 0 M L) N .1 1 L. I "F E C J , i.l ' F' i._ t E. :. v t:: I i %J A U 1. L IS u P p L I E s v E h 1'. L E 6 0 99 6 30' 5 0 b 9 0 NVI'lONAL AUT- DEALL-RS UUS'EJ CAR 6100 6 3 0 5 0 061 90 NA TI ONA L E R C: 1- i A Ni G E s uf" 610 1 6 3 0 7 45 0 5 -3/ 9 0 NA*110NAL F I R Ll" P R 0 T F-.* C�*--f I N A S N 6 10 2 6 3 0.- 0 0 1\1 C R L P A I R S 11 A I N T 61 ` -' -'39 4 0 5 15 0 0' i;:8: NE-J-:)'ON JEAN V L C 0 4 6 0 • 5 7 5 0 N 0 p SET M F" A U L W E L 1) 1. P4 G rfl A I NT 1`1 A IF IR J. A L VIA INT M AT N 'I A 'f E t 1. A L lyi 0. U N J* 4-4 91-'-'..50 66 . 54 75.00 I-bo . 00 1,:: 0 0 1 3. 4 4 1.1 .44 .35 1 300.00. 91.00 450.00 10.00 S . 0 0 Q 17" . 0 2:7 . 9 0 Ci E 1 1 H E r : K AMOUNT 6bl .41b &]l 4 5- r 0 .5 0 0 0 I C) 5 o o 4 s 9 t.. 9 4 300.00 1 s 0 0 0 . 5 91 .00 0 .00 99.90 75.00 IJZ. 00 1 7 0 6 .8 , Z Z, VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE WOOD PAGE 1� off / i p l4n 1 1 .' . -. n ...., a.2. . ... .._ ] 1, 0 .. _ ..:,.,... 00 1 ._ MA, N T M T .3 Y : ... .. . ... .v ., .. POR pER 1 0D f X115` 71135t 05/29/90 PETERSON, PHYL PROGRAM REG FEES . 1� r00 12.00 37 38 3 Y � ��3 - :' ..-. :. • .:, 41.a r • U 3� f,..NT E OTHER ." � �kJ� � 40� s6w�► 4 1 .. CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR I TE::M I TEI I CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT , 16 J " 6��' 5 1$2 05/ 8/90 NO tTHLAND RLr• Et IGE�RAT'ION REF'A I a 9 MAINS � 04� .00 y �04S 00 9 _.. �. �:w�_ i t � ►... W_. ! w ' ...t? : :. .. : :N0R NaT AR T' F ...T ........... ..,. M �. - SU PU.IES Eta 1, NT ,� 0 8 , o 11 12 6107 661970 05 „ NORTHSTAR WIPER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES JANITOR 185.50 185 1 13 14 1 5� 6 105 468.00 0 /1+ G EPTh1 Al. HEALTH Sp IGE MEDI GAS. EVA.IIAT t �� r 7 _ 7 t( 7 FEES FOR SE RV I GE. 26.50 _ M7 ++ y p+ / � K� �1 � iJ I�,. / Ak% sn 265.65 61 0 .. _ ..:,.,... 00 1 ._ MA, N T M T .3 Y : ... .. . ... .v ., .. �4 . X115` 71135t 05/29/90 PETERSON, PHYL PROGRAM REG FEES . 1� r00 12.00 37 38 3 Y � ��3 - :' ..-. :. • .:, 41.a r • U 3� f,..NT E OTHER ." � �kJ� � 40� s6w�► 4 1 .. �l _.,. _���.: .�.��1 ti_T.S I_D_E'. �E.N_G,.�I':E E.S... :..:: ♦ 4, 3 44 OUT ENG FEES X74.00 45 OUTSIDE. ENG FEES, 5'x.40 � 4, r �= r OU T 46. E 83 7 y 4 6 ': .. G ,_. 5 5n 6117 [ 712 105 0y /28 /90 PI THEY BOWES OUTSIDE RENTAL. 468.00 468.00 53� r, 55 � 61 i G�''s30 G l J OF '99IONAI.. F EES FOR SE RV k 41C 80.33 FEES FOR SE RV I GE. 26.50 106.83 5e 59 6119 730400 05/28/90 QUIET COUN K ITS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 265.65 sn 265.65 61 4 62 .,....,.,. 5 0 0 5 / / '9 0 E" E�, , CA �y y � � 6121. -: : 74i X10" 05G1 /0.. RA Ii�iJL?OW I N r . w 7 PROGRAM. SUP P S U � I �. E {� 9 r i # �+4 7 67� 6122 7 4 1 2 2 0 05/28/90 R A M S E Y FOUNDAT C M E: ... _. ...._......:_ _... TRAVEL. TRAIN � 175.00 _ .W.._.�._..__w..._ __._. .�_._...�._.�_..� �.., 175.00 68 69 6125 741700 05 /28/90 RAMS COUNTY MAx�IT MATERIAL SAL _ 70 u MAINTE NANCI: MATERIAL. 39869.88 73 74 REPAIR ,MA INT /: 780 »44 6,149 r7Z 75 � 0 MAINT MATERIAL 835.24 , CONTRACT PYM. 80.20 1 , OT 86 # �� VOUCHREG C CITY O OF' MAPLLWOOD P PAGE 13 '- - - / /.L../ _ _I- _,�2.0..._,....... - - .._. _..._ _.. - . __..._..... _ _. .............._._ .__...__ .- VUU I ISTER FOR P PERIOD 05 CHECK V VEND C CHECK V VENDOR I I T'F -. M I ITEM C CHECK NUMBER N NUMBER D DATE N NAME D DESCRIP•fION AMOUNT A AMOUNT 61 2.4 7 74.1725 0 05/28/90 0 R RAMS'EY COUNTY F FE:l -'S FOR SERVICE. 6 63.08 REPA MA INT EQUIPMENT 2 25.27 4 4 6125 7 742850 0 05 /28/90 R RAY ANDERSON & SONS F FEES FOR SER VICE 4 4 4 4, Z04 .04 ' 6 61::6 7 74.. 0 05 /Z.8 /90. R RAY DAVIS SONS S SUPPLIES; JANITOR 6 6.36 6 6.36 f 6 1 Z 7 1 1 6 1 6 - 90'' 0 Z. 0 R a N T I N U _ _._._. � � u� �.. � E�s��� �� E .�.� _ _ - - � _ 2 ' 6 6128 7 77090 0 05/28/90 R RYDE:R TRANSPORTATION O OUT S IDE RENTAL 1 115.00 ' ' r .........M_ .._.... Q Q11T ___fit ... . _.r._.rt ...r......_.....� ..,_.. _ _ ._. _ .._ . 6129 7 78 0300 . .05/ 28/90 S SST OFFICE PRODUCTS INC m . S SUPPLIES OF 8 88.6 01.3,. . I 6130 7 780350 0 05/28/90 S S.E.H. O OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 2 23, 933.86 ; I E R.1 IV ' OUTSIDE ENGINEERING Z Z4 ! , 1.3Z 7 790500 0 05/28/90 S SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA F FEES FOR SERVICE 6 61.04 6 i ,. 1 3 0 0000 05/28/90 S SOFTWARE CLEARING HOUSE' R REPAIRS MT NCE., 3 324 . W 3 324 ,00 �. Z6/9 S SOL � � 613 5 8 8 15 0 y OS /�8 /S�C� S y EQUIPMENT CJT'HE.k 3 349.00 3 34+.00 ! 6 6136 8 831600 05/Z8/94 S SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS S SUPPL OFFICE 9 94.72 'f S SUPPLIES OFFICE 7 70.8£ SUPPLIES O FFICE 5 5.23 1: f SUPPLIES OFFICE 2 24.45 FEES FOR SERV 1 150.40 SUPPLIES C1f= =ICE 3 39.55: SUPPLIES OFf- ICE: i 72.40 , i+ SUPPLIES OFFICE I a8.2 I � U FI SUPPLIES OFFICE 1 161.36 x x SUP PLIES Of' F ICE 5 58.10 5 t 6137 8 840400 0 05/2.8/90 S ST-PAUL CITY OF C CON PYM 2 24.00 TRAVEL. & TRIAN 3 300.00 ; ; _ - - ' I VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE.WOOD PACE 14 + a 4 FOR PERIOD 05 , z VGUCMEE! 3 CHECK VENDOR C H E. C: K VENDOR ITEM I T Em CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIP AMOUNT AMOUNT 7 + 1 � � 84160 05 /28/90 S 7 A C M ANUFACTURIN G" mm D I S T REPAIR M AINT 11h• 1 115.81 4 10 ti , _...__...w.. .....E+1 ............:$ - cl0:. :_. .S T.AF'l.a , P.A_UI.:I.N.E...._ _....,. _..:__......_ . .. . ..�_...:_...._..._....: I Cr L.E�, _.kLl_ « j!�1A N CE» _.. _ . _. ,, . 2 4 .7•_C► ......... _..- , :....... 24.70- . 61401 845200 05/28/90 STEFFEN SCOTT 14 TRAVEL TRAIN 5.d7 8.27 15 e 141 05/ 28/90 4 S _...T. _ .__.___._ t6� ST•OWE, .S HARON PROGRAM REG FEE s 12.00 12. ni _.... __....... _ _ . c i -'- 0. 5:x.. ! 9 0 E+"�U� PlwiE=N SUP'P'LIES EQUIPMENT ' ^I 113r50 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 18.40 791.52 ire; � G1 : 8.50660 05/8/90 . SUP'ERAMER ICA ----- SUPPI.I ES w.iU I E'MENT 17 . 85 :5! FUEL„ O IL r 59 X7. 860, 100 05/28/90 T.J. AUTO P ARTS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 98.44 ?91 SUPPLIES VEHICLE 5 .68 30 1 : 161-6 32 ;.�' ::'` �7' T.� J r is "Hi .. �c UOTH 95 . Pi0 : � L _UNIT-ORMS. _C L.0 T 35 H .. � w�... ,...__ .._ .., .. w....... . _ .._._ .._ W.. _ .. +r..+Y.._. 36 UNIFORMS & CLOTH] 21.x.0 37 PROGRAM SUPPL.I ES 3e ao ' • R A!! 4 4 1 6I 4: 860 'x5 �5r�8I�0 T � K D A � 42 I� EGxNIlING 45 6147 861175 05 /28/90 TFLENOVA 46 TELEI'H+ NE 567 .62 56T.62 47 1 14 8 8 70 05 / 8 / 9 0 T 1 LL GES $Ew V EC RE G P 12. 1 .00 4.14 0 . tC3LL GM FAM r A►._t _.' 0 0 521 6150 871 250 05/28/90 TOTAL TOOL. SMALL TOOL_ 54 63.65 63-65 55 1 1 18075 4IE.i /90 rRCtHIES UNL IM ITEtI P SUP'P'LI 1 00 ■ 00 57 5$ PROGRAM SUPPLIES 40.00 5s 4 100.. +� 0 .�40 ■ 0 0 ro 61 6152 880750 05l8/90 TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES S 6z UP PLIES ES JANITORIAL. 47 .45 47 .45 63 i {158 TUWOUI I i » SUPP JANITOR 1r?9 65 66 67 - 9.0 ± _ 0 . I , '_ ! F,O R hI. .. IU L. M TIE D . :W. . ....... _ ...._.: - __ U IU I F �D Fi M S CLOTH r .._........._ ._......0 .... .... N ^6.36 68 U C L O T E-� t N G - __........_.._... _._ ..._......._ _......_...-._. ...__..._..__..._._.........__ __.^..:..... 115.00 69 70 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 100.65 71 4 ____ ...__......_.._.. UNIFORMS C I OT M 0 6 . 9 L; 72 UNIFORMS & CLOTH 87 446. 731 5! �� �... :?_._.:.�. �' X5 IJNIVER�A�L M SUPi�'L' + ;� .. ._ , t .. I E. - EQ U.I.P M ._ hiT.. *, 0... ��T 0 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE.WOOD PAGE 15 0 5/18 /90 i ,, ff ����•p� p r ��yy �_ r p, 1 • �Ltli�Il� �...... 11. �T.E..Il..._._..,.. -_. F OR P E R I O D 05 __ - - - - -_ ....... ....... . VENDOR _ CHECK VENDOR CHI CIS ITEM I T E M CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 6156 91 030 0 05/23/90 VAN 0 LIT INC SUP PLIES VE:NICiLE � 72.36 SUPPLIES EQU IPMENT 30.56 1-02.92 615T 910504 05/28/90 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL FEES FOR SERVICE 172.73 13 1 FEES FOR SERVICE 15.00 15 15 FEES FOR SERVICE 249.10 8031464 17 w- - - - -" is _$._ �. W:. _ Q Q._._ _ :_. _ ►�� /. t / 9 0. _ L.F . ' 1. ..:.1 .R_x IV :T.- tel: _.._ _ _ .� _ ..... _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ ...1J P .. I _ . _ OFF F I u _� P w CE. 26 40 SUPPLIES OF *-FILE. x,.15- SUPPLIES GP F t CE 65.47 85 13 - - 6159' 93052 0 /28/90 W ACKE:R, CA R. LYN P REG FEES 90. 90.00 �., 26 610 930 0 WAGN RnG RE.G F 1 ?9 6161 9 94.0550 0 05/28/90 W WEHRMAN BERGLY ASSOCIATES I INC FEES CrNfit.tl.T ING 2 2 T � T '; FEES CO NSULT I NG 1 1 110.00 ; ; ?'62.00 6162 9 950110 0 05/28/90 W WONDERMAT CLEANERS R REPAIR MAINT" EQUIPMENT 2 29.00 2 29.00 6 16 3 0 05/28/90 : : K E R O X. C O R P. DUPL ICAO ING COSTS 5 574 DUPL ICA *r I NG COSTS 2 25.68 - - -----.4 0_. - --Y -W 4 0 1 (7""' 0 CV h I I 000 I a G r ElHf:'.'l_0YEE f, LISS EnRNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY FIDERIOD I I '. " : . H �- , . .1 ,. 1.11 '* . ' ' :!!;, ____,�:'. - I ;_I.. : . � �'. � :.�. . . <. . . � :_..::::"p4 _l . . -, . . . .' _ . . " I . .. '' , ,. I I . ' .' . . � I . I � I : I �:."' � , ,�. I '. ". � .% . .. ., � '' . I I . , . , � . . 1 ., � ,.1 I . r��"'. 1. _:�;'!' . I . . , I . � . . . .1 �. . , . . . . � � I . . - . � . . I .': . I �'. . �y *�_ � _ , '':: , .� : '� ''i''. � CHECK,- DATED,- ` ]R� ..'�. ;'�:. , � ' I . � . . I I.. I I - ..�. .� . . 1. I � I .11 .1 . 1. 1. , ..' . I 1: , * � �!:".�:: I I .. .!� 1. .... I . , ' i.,: , ��,' '. ' ' �'..:' . . I . --- I-,-----,---- . ...... ,. � I WlCk T � 1. .. � . . I - I . I. I 2 ,.. � . � '.: .. I . ..' I., � I .. I I. '.;:�. . � '. - I I . I I .1. I .1 - . :'..;:�:.:.:'..'�:... , 1: ..... . .. I .�.' .. .� o ' . 1. . .. . .'i ". ,�� . � I .... . p ... : , ..' , . I I . ''. . :'i: - , I . . .. 1. .1 , I . , . � ..' .. I .. . - . , . . . . . I . . I I . I.- 1. � I � � I . I .1 . � . 1*�. .. '..�' �. I -, . I.... . �;:,� .1 :� ... I . . I � �... , , ..... ��' . � I I . . ,. . ..' I � . .��'" I � .... I , . 1. ''...' '. I � I �':'. '';'.�' ' . . . � � 4 , - - . I.. � �.... I I... 11 __ . � , � ,: .' - : :' ''I �. '' I �'....' ':..' , . �, .:���."�� �'.��.: .��:: . '' ..._. I I ' .' ". , �' ,�' � , '' I , , . . � , I , ., � . � . I.. I . I . � . . : .. , ., . I I � � .1, 1 � I I �. � . , � . , :� : :;�. - 1� - . I , . I � I :.- �.. , : 11" . : 1, � . � ,- .. . .. . .:' . .� . . . . '. , " . . '�':: , , . . . . �. � I . 11.1 . � :� I .... I . . . . .1 I .. . I .1, . . . I . I .' . . . . I I � 3 I ,. L . . I � . . . I I I d ,. .' . I I .. . , . . 1, . : , .. � I . I � . . , . . � I 1: � �::" " " � . .� -1 I I .1 . . I I I . 43 .. . � . . I I m I 'ITTA E L_'Fr_Ff_l_iEG=R -1 " 2 8611.). 74 .. ;. � '" 1. ' : ".r,,,.. _' . .. . I . . . I - "_ ' - I _;;� . ., ], I " �' ; I I - . I . ,,r . , . - ��;;_`.��",4,"':�Lj, � L � : L�: ,',, r . ''; r� �':.L' 11, . . .11 � . I � . �' �,'._ ';: �,,',.:r,, I I .. . . � ,r . .�'��..":�"��;�� .-..-."L L I : :' � ;. �.!L � . I r - �:. 11 . I � . . ,:� '. " � I . . I L I " :. , , , � . �: , " _L '; : :.: ..:, - . '�" , -, : !-: . :: ' � - L'..� :` .:L" I ' ' :. . jr '. .. i .. .!..�z . * �.�r - r "; �. �:": �;: -, . :. _' . . . I r. . _. �t : L . ' d �. 1 �:� ' � " . L .. . .r � .:: I L ' . ' . " r � . _L �" . �..� .' ' � " ' ' . ,-f---,, (�r 44 5 6 a 0 I . . . . � ( ) ( - ) "..] s (") ", .. I , '; C. + .. - 1% - G' A I L E-4 L. A C ly S TO 1\1 E . . I C .. : . ...' ...' A, l. I '.) I %- 8 i' . 1 . . . -1 . �::: L : 7 . � '':: ...J.- � I ... . I . . . . . . ... . . ,:,: .. . I .1 . ....l. b I . ': ,:::.�. '.�:.�.:�,� .:.::�..::�.:�'.. .. ' , . L . . I . : I . _ : '� ,. I., I L I.. .. I . . . . .1 . . L b I L. . I . . . . . � . I b : :.: I., . . . � � : .. , I . � . . I � . I I ,:... , ' . . . b I I L I .. .. ": :.�::� : ' �* *.: � � � . L . 4 . .. . . : , ' � . . I . . .": . . . :' I .. . � ' . , . : I . !�. - - . 11 � . : , ..: :. - , -, .. . � - I '' b .,;:. ' I b ", , I � � . 1 � I �' L , I . I . .. . . . 1 I I - ; .��L :. I . .' . _ , I . � b I .. ,� . I . . I I . I . . I . * . � I .. I ' " 11 - L : '.� :,:. : "..�� , '��. _ � , - . I l . . , .1 ,L L : . . .b . .. I . � :: . �:� � " , L I . . . . . I . . -L I � .. : :. . . , . . L ', . - .' ' ': � �'. � , ,*_ , . : �. L I I. � . , . I . , : ,. . , : . ' ' L . .. I . .. .. , � . � . I . .. *1 . �* , , �. . . . . I I I I L I .: . . . � � '.'.: " �; - .!: � . . . : I �. '� . I . ; . ' : , . L . � 4 , . 41. 1 , : � ' lb h . .. * r .. ' , L ' .� `�� ... :�' L� . ' � , . I - :. . � I � �� � � �' : I I - _____._.'.__". . -1 I' 1-1- - - � . ___.. _ I L . . . . . , . . . , L I . I I . .1 I I : . L : 8 . . . L , . . ... . :. . . I � . . ..�.. I I . . . . . L . I - - L' L I I � .;:_ �:.... L. I L . *� .1 5005 1. . . L . . L . I � � . I . . '� ) J' .: . . . � , . . L:'�'):i I 1. . L I . . .. . . . . I . L . I : , , . .: � .. I L .. . .. .b . . L I I . . ,: L , . ; - .' -, . . . . . I .. . :: . ' I I . I . ..... . "%.*� . L L : �L L . , . b L . . I I . . : - I ,. . .. ; L � . 1, I . . . I b b� . . 1 , : I . I . I . : . ' - - . . I ., , I � I , L , - :- , I � . L I � . . . . . L .* .. .105/ 111/901..: 1 . . .' . I . .: : L . . , I � , .: . .: , : , b I 1, . . %* ... , RET-HE. " 1. '' .. I . . b I I . , , : . ... .. :. , . ' L . I I I . N;' L .. . .. . . . - ' ' , , . . . I . . , ,* * , . . I ' - - ' , � I : ' , I I .. b . � , .: , . , . . , , . b I L. , ,' . , . . I ,b ' I . ' , , , , L . . . ; : " ■ ' L ' 'G L �MAGL I CR.�, �, -1 .:'' - .'I.'' . L IL . . - ' L .. . I . , . . ,b I I . � . . . . . . ' L : . . I . . . ,. -1 . 1, . . . L . I : . . I 3 8 8 , 5 0 I . I • . ". I b . , . . . I : ... ' L . L L . . L , , : . . . . .. . . . I b . - L - : : : . , I 9 I . I . . . . L . . . :� . . . . . I . . I I . . . . , I . . . I L . I . . I ' . � - . �:' : : - � . ; . ' I L , L : , � . . � � : � : :: :: : : . b I . : - - , . . I . ! ,. : . ,. - . . . .: : . ' : . : . '. . . , L . �' I � , , . , . I . L . L . . L ! L , : � ' .' .. ' : I . , , I , , , L I . , : , I � I . : , , : . . � . L � - , , � � - ! , , . , � * . . . , . � b � . - . �. . . : , , , I � . ' . I ' , I . - I . . , , , �. , � -! : L' " : ",' � _� , . , . , � I , � I I . . I . . I I , . : � "� . , . , . .L - I I . , "", , ' :' "' . -1 11 ' L � I � b . % :"-,., , . 1 , ; , ': ' :' L ' . - : L . � . . . 1 b I - I I . I . . . � ..' . , ,. I . , . , , : ; . . ; I , . I 4 I _' . , I L : : , I I I I � : . : . . . . I . . . I . I 0 ' f 7- 5 -r)r- . I � I � , , . L _ , : � . � . _ . � 0 , . 9 - L . , - ' - ' I L . I � . " . uj . - . . , . - - 9 � I r�'-,�TI-7-r--T(--')- GRETr,T:f tyl n G'* L I C H L . L I 59 2. /i. 8 KATHRYN S�.IITH I I 06 7. 90 . � .. '�", , . '' .1 . I :.:. .... � '_:�;� _":,� �". .: _: . '' L. :; '' .' : .: � '. ..' " L �*:::�' '' L N: I :.,:, -: .'", ,:. 1. t, ., I. I . ;...*Z:.. � �!� , � �".ii��:.':��.":�; � I ''. ,.�: .' ; I 1 067m 90 - ''I ... 6 .. .plxl�" . :' .,L':- � .'. - 1, 11, - :. �"!'* ;.. 1. '' . .' .. I .. I ..L.'.. I... ..L. ....''. . � . .L." � I.. , , ':�,:�'. .. I 1. ,� I... . ..L.. I I - L 'L ,..:,: _.. �.: L: '' '.: I - I . * , ' . . I. . I �. :'L .:1 .. -, , .':::::::'.";::.,.!'',: L:: . L f' �1" �.';: . . - : L.:.: : . .!L" L .. : ; : . : .''L : , : *.: � L' I "_�';� _.- , ` , - .' . .' _ : - I.::,::":; L . I.. . , � ,*'.�..'- '...��" :" .-'��'.' L. "...' .. .. '' ..':,.::::"� �:: � . . . , '!�" `:'.". '': � "' " .''i -,,-. "':1- . .:�' '... 1, I I - .''::: . I , f ' :�L .. , ..- - - " . , .�.! I " - .�� !:: _.. ' - , *! �"�. . L I L. . .. - , . .,. .. :�'. "'._4:��.' �.�',L.� - I - :�':�' , I ��::� '''. ,!* ,"";;9 �:i.' . �'. ._� , I I " , . . '' '� I .� .,.-" ..' `t�:�o � .- - - �� , ' t'�' , ' ' - �'� " . I . "�. :.' ; :: ''.':'.': ::: .':':: �'L:;. - ..:.� . . .- , ..' 'L '� .. .:�." ,.,.;,., �, �::'.*ml , '' ._:��4"Tl..'�:�'� . 1: * �, I',' .' ', ._ - -�' ,".... ,-. �� :; � .. -., ... .- - . - � _. '. ,,.,:, �,,�'���,�,.;�:..*, " �; . ._..';._: '' ! . 1, . _':':�,�: -- _'.. . � . �.��.;:. .. . "-. .. . _ ,. , 1. . . '.: : . , � -, , , � .. .- .' . . , T, �'. :z .:��,.'.�,,.,;�;�..''��':���L," .':!:�' �P�,��'n"!'�"'!.'.�. �� ..,.,:: I . . . . .,.''.. . I.. .1 .,.. � _ . - . ", '', . '"'_.�; . � I ' - L :% 1, I f:., :...' L �, , . .: .. . L.. . I , , , J_ . F �, . .. _ . . - �.. I :� ,. 'q , . ::.� �L ��!: 1: :' , I : � ..... , , . , :. i� ,:. .. I - ! . , �L.'� . . ''. I "'' ... . I I I . . '... L.. I I . .l.. .: . 11 . . .11 . , L �� L I .'_. .L. . .� .... r I.. I . .. .� L . . . .. . . . 11 . .. I .. I . - 1. I., I . -------- JAHN . . .4 -1 - , �:�::�:�:�.�z:::!:.",...":�.*�':�:�::Z�7*;.:�:�'�:�.-,;:��:::;�-.:��;.'_.�:_ '' .,.,."'.**:'':,:.:,L:.-.,j-*''-.,.. .. ..:.:.,;, !�'l.!: -'-.'�'�::'�!..*'.a'".'!, - - -u-, L � , . 7 . � '', r I I � - 111 --- L . . -- ; Lr !, .:' .. I . . . L . I . . . � :. . * , I : % 1 , ; . , � . :� �� . : ; � � .'. , - ; ;' 7 � � . , . . L . . I � L L I M _ , L r , . , . I . d . . . . , , - . . . . . " 1 , I ,� . L : r . . ' ' ' ' . ' L . _. ' * � - -, �.: � , - .' � -- - . . : , :1 - � . & I ' ' * ' * ' ' * . . . . . . . :' �: "% : , . 'L : ' ; . . : ' ' ' : *: : : . . , .% A . : . . ': . - . - . : . : . : �: :' - - : ': %� . L ;" :.:; ' � ; : .. ., - .: , ' '��:� . L� :�' _.: , , d b � : .. b ' ,r , . . , , � � L - - - . ' d t , r � ".� � * � L ' . , � �: : . 7 : ... : � .. .. �. i�.:� : � : �: �� ��: �: �:�::.�::�:� " :::�] .'.: � � : .,*.,: ' ' ' ' : - L � d I _. r : : : :" : r - : r, ' ! ' . :� _b __ �".'�� � - . � � L , L , r L - . I _ � L " r . , .: : : . . : : ::: : : : ::: ,:: ' �* . : ." :' :::: � _ ; : ' ' ! .d' � , .. . . I . � . . . . , � . , r % ' ' d . , r � . . ' L r . d r . . . - : b , , '. : . . � : r. . �� : _ : . : L . . L . I - . r. . � - - . .� . .. L L ; . . . I r I I I b . . I I d , � I . I , . .� , . '. d .... : . - �.' . ....... � . ... . . , - .: . . . . I . . . r . . � I . . . . . . . ' I d . . I . - : . � . - - . ' ' - , ' r' b � : :..r .r ,: . . : ' ' ' . ' . . r r _. � L L '. , . ; : . I : r, I d ! - , . r , - : ;. � : ::, d !:. ; : : , :. ' ; ' . . .::' . , : : : ' , . . : r ' :';* ,..;' ' % .: L : '.�: . '. � : . r. . � . � , , .' � .' . , , , . , , � , , . . d L . I , r ' r ' L L . . '.i��.'.-� , � ,%. ' .: . .� , I " �:. b � .L , . , . L . r I I . , � I .; �. . , r , . .' � . : _ ." - . r % ��-. - L . . . . :. . . :d:: ::: L ::;.: '. : d , , :: . : : r . ' . �.; ,. . : ':: *� 1 'r- 19 ::.: 7::::::::':.'.�." .�:. r Lr .' . . . : . j= .- . . . . .- - . . �L " . " .�.� r �' . :. '�L ,:*" , ,� . .. I . . . . '. .... , . .b , b . . , I . . I I . .' d . .. '-) " ' ' " ', � L ' � , '* -, _ " *' :. , I L . . � . . :' . '� � b, " . . . I . - .:.:..'::9' .'* " : . b . . . . : 1. . . ' . *':'�'.,;:,�:',"'-:�-:�r.... . d % t:: 4 �::: 4' � -`.�: :� ��.`.'-'*:; �:!::� - ,. � . '� ,�`_�' ' . : : : - : : r ' . . : : : - ' : .: : ' r . : L r . d � .'. . : . : . . :: f :. . I I . . � ' '. r :: r : � L : . � �:. ...' � _ � - - L � ' . : � . : : , : ;: ; .' :: r - : ' . * . - . ' _ , . . . � _ % . . , ; M1 � . , m t : : - : " ' * . . . ' �`. ' : L � . . L ' . . t . : : :: : :: 1 ! : .��! : :: . . :: : : _ _ . . - ' - - , : ' ... - . . ( ' I * u J � 0 . ;: . b . . . 2 7 6 a 8 0 , ... I. . I .. ...' . - L (.'. .. " 5 / 1� 1: Z.9 � - ,; LARRyr ' _ I , 1� 11 % , . . L , b' �.. . . , , , , : . .'�]�.' � I , . . L � r , . - r ' %.� : 7 : : :: : .. . . . . . . . ' ' . ::: ::; . . . . I I . . I . I : . . � . . , . , . , . .' . 1 : , : , I :. q � w : ;,:::.: .. : '. � � �; . . L . � : : . '. : : '. ::' !:,: : ' : . r : : ; * : , I , , ! : . ' . . . , , : I . �: . . I d - : . � : : ; : I : . . . . . , . : r .. � , . . . . � . . . 2 1 . . I I . I . �: .. :":, . , L '.. � . : . . . . I r . , . . r L .. b . . . . . . r. . � . ! : . . . . : ' . : . . . . . . . L . . L I L .. . . I . . . - . . . . . . . . . �. - I - - . - - - �. � - - - - - - - - - - . _r . . . . . . . . . . - - . . - - . L . L •-) t. Z�_'_____ "I- .- .. -- ____' - I i�_�i_4'3. I C-) 1 7 2. BIL-) I 12-7a57 r .. . I I r I . L . . .* * -) I ,:::, C) .L "- 'N .g I ....- ( .) (_ ._j - U. ) (" 30 (.- 5/ 1 1 /90 D E L 0 R E ,rZ3' 'A V I GNALO I I 1 ._-,, I a ...j .. ) . .J . ` . ': '_'';'_'__ L7 I . I L . � r I 1. r � _ '��_._�, . : .,:L L . . " " 4 r . I . I r I . . I r. �' `_r.. 1. ,�'. . �.." � � . �'. .'.. � � I I . . ,., 'Lk - ' ' L'r L'' . . -..----.,-.-,.-4-,.----.-- __ . r-:::: .. �:':'::.: . .. r '' �'.' I * . � ... r ., L L . I . . . - �ad' *' "� - .. , � �'r_*'. . �:'. I . - . � .1 ': . . r .. � .: " :.' L '' .. . I L - %.. L % , I . ::.. ' "L ." 'r ... L . , r � , - , .11 L r I . . � . ' I.... ... I I � �.''.�:,,r' _ . I.. I ' r. L . . I I : r. .. .: , . . : �:��: ''. " -11 ' ' � �,:;r�.:.!:,..:.:�.:.;:!::�'.:: .1.1"... r L . .. - :�.. L . r . r�:L r � , r L r L _:�� L I '.'. qr,� :' . :.: . - . r �.;�:.:: *: I '. . 'r, - . ... .. - r ,.r... ' 1. : I L L ..'' . L'' r ' , : L�'" .:' : �L.: : 'r: L I r L ' I . : ". ' 1. - ,� . . 1 31 : . . ...' ...... ....' � : :� . . r I .. , , * ... ... .. . I L L L . . - L . I - .1 . . . . . : � L ' ,. .' . ..;_' ".' : .� .' " L . '�:' '::: : - ' :. ' . . r.. � ,. ., � ! r : - I I I . L I � � ' :� . . . . . I r I . � , .r, , � ... . 11 , 4 - . � . . ' L . .' L I .' I.., I I I L � .1 . . . .1 L .1 '. . �' " . . L � . I , . . . r . r. .r . L . I I I r' ._ " : ''r I I 'L .� , , .1 . ...'' '. r I . I I I � I . I . : .r .5 e '� '. r;. ,_ '. .L I r . I . . I r I / ' . : - .1 - . . r L, L L . . I . .4 1 4 . I � . '. 'q C) r L : , ' �L �: L ' �L � - ` � ., . % I I � . . . I I . I . , ,. I . . ' L . . . , . � . . 'L .'.* .*.:.;,... ': .. .. . � . L�. �.; L L ' .. � ' i :LO " L . . _; .. . . 1 1 146,40 I . I . I X �: ... , . L;�.: .. I .1 . : - . 1, '!��' , . ',.. .: r L _.. . *"::!::: ..: L.': :' , . ,: r . .1 I _.. I . - '. �� , - r� L L � . . I ._) I . � . .. .. '� 5 / :I.L . . � . . )r) :�" . _�. . - I . , .:. r I I � . I 1 S.7 1DAV r I I . 3 2 .: . 1 . . . I I . . � . � . . . 4 . . I � . . I . I , . . I I . I I . . � � I r , ,- ' , , , _ , L ' L � : I . . I , , . , . , i . ' ' � : , , . r� ! .. . . . . : L . I . I L I . , , '� ; � � � � � � " � � � � � , L L , . . . I : . I : m ' . , : ': . . , . 4 . . , . 4 . . . . � .1 r . I . � ' . ' I . . . ': ' , - : !. : , , : . . , , . : . r . . , , ' , : . �' : - ' : . 7 L L . . L . I . . I .. L , : r ' L ' � ' I 1 - : . � . , : : I . . I . . � I . L i . . . � . . I . - : . I . . . :' � : . ' . r I : ' : : I : : . � : : . � . : . . . . . � , . . . . I r I , . - L : � , . � : ' - ' 4 4 ; - � � '; L ' � ' , � ' L . , ' , I . : , ' , , .; �. � .' �'.'. �'. '_ , : : . � I ; : . I L : . � " _ _ . . . ; . . r , ' : � . I . . . � : � . . r . r I . . . . ' - . . . . . . L . I r . L, . � � . L - - ! r . . L , , L � . ! : 4 , . I I I t �' ' . . . , , , 4. . . . r, . ' r . � : , r . . , . r � . - ..' . I � . � , L . � : : L . . - L : : 4 ' r � : :� : ': : : * ' � - : r ; , . L :. , .. : r , . , ::' � * ' . . : ; . , � r . L , . . . , .� ��..�' .4 . - . ; , , � - . . . , I . , . r . I . r . r I :::. I ..' . . ' : ; L ' ' : � . : . r . I I I L r . L I I . I . - � : - � i , I L � � , . I I ; � , I .; : � ; : , , �'� . .. , I . . . r I . . ': - L : � : : . . ' : : . . , I I I . r . . . I . I . . I . . . . , � � I r . . I . . I L , I r r ,:,,; r I ' I . I � ' ' L L ' : � � � , L I , I 33 . L � I I " . . 1 4 - I . . . r L � I . I . . . LL . � I r r, . �� r . � - L ; � . , I , . , ; r L. . . . . r I . L Lr . I I . . . .. , . . .: I.. I . . L I . . . I I I . . I . I rr . I . L , . L : � . , j i . . , . . L L . . . L L I . . r . . . I I . I . . " L - . . . . � ,.. l I r I . . . 1, L I I - . - I I ____� r -.1- . . .4 I � I t. _073 7-1-1-713-0. I %.J ' '_ . 35 1 . .11 0 .:-) I r " j .-) t .. .I � 36 k- . k. 1 -3 C-) 5 / I �' 1. 0 . . L I . . r . . r . .1 . I I r� '' - .1. I �� .* I .. I , I �17 . - r - ' ' ' ____ I I . �. 1 . I I . . I . L .' . ' ' �, r I . I . L. - . 1. I .1 . .. .1 . . I . . . 1. !�' ; .r.. .,'%'.r '' . :1 � I ... L L 'm'.. r r . 1 37 .L: . I I I . . . � ,r .. I . L L I � r . � � . � � , ' :� L , L , I I . . � . I . L . . . .. . . I . . . :. 1 . I .. r . I . ,. . L : 11 ... . . I .. I L. . I I .'. I . t . . . : L. � . � . . ; r . J: �� .' I . . L I I I I . I I I . . . .' L r L : 1 : . ' . .' . . . . r . . . I I I . I � L I ,. r,r I I . I . I . I I. I . I : . I . I . . L .: . .. . . I . . I :1 ' L ' � . L r . r - . 1. I . . . . 'L . . .. r r . .. L, : . . : , r . I .. ... I . . I 1 , L I , r I I . . � . L . . C U S L � , I . . . I . , . I r L . ... . . * - _or20....... 'i . 4 b _ L .. .'. .r. .! . ' I .1 , .. .... I ... .. . ' : � L'� :� I 1. I I.. . I .:� � :�:!:: .: .:.: � I - L . .:.:�.:.�::::'::� ... . . L .. ..: . : :..::: L .. .. . I.. ...' . r .... L I �.. L I.. ,�. �'.:' .' L : . . , _�. L :.' r'. - ..::�! . - - - I.. _ ... . '....': .'.'.L''.. .. � .,:.::'. r I .�.: ' L .'..r 'r - �.;_ . ""'::'��:. .. - : "L 'r . - .. r,'' L , , " '' - . ', . I _ ... L, L , L. . r', I .' , 'L' ... .. - . r.. '':. . ' ... . .. . .. �. . . ,p r "I . L '!� '', " �� L. ,.:: : L �: ::*:.:.�...':'. .:.L ...' _:::L ":.:::''.:, �:;.. r.. ,':��::L:.:L:.: .. r.... L., . . L . . r ... ,. :...,. I 1. � . . .,Lr - .. . .:. .: 1�1 L.. L . , . , r L f; ''.r L, r . .1 . ,r,:,.;:.L:.:.';:.�� '*:::: . I . . . 1: ..! , . � LL , 7 - ,:,r, ' r ' '' .. ' . . . . '::;-_:�:�'*":: :':. I :'.'!"'"'." ' .. L . - . ". r' I L : L , .: ''. . " � r 1, .'. .. . ''. �. r.' L .' Z� � r . .. �.. � I r . . . . . . .:: .� L .... - r � �e. ; %r� , , ': : r . - ' ' . ..; - . .; " �'::.:. % .I.. . ,r. r.. .1. .1 . . - r . � I I . I .1 L .r �� I .. .... . r r . . ':. . . . .; �� L�..' .' ' 39 � .:.: �" .. . . . . ' I : ... . L . .L I .' . , r , . . . I . '. . . . . . I . L . . .r , I .. . _ . .: . I . L � : . . rr . r . .. . r. � , . .. . . . .. I �.' . L . I. I . :�� , :. : .. .:: � . � .� . . . . r . . � . . r I I I r . I . I . . I . ' . ' . I . . j, , . � , . I . . I I � 'L . . . . . . . . . : : I . . I � � 8 , r _ , j " ' j' "L "-' , "--- , ' , , '* - ' - . I I _ , C- a _ ) . ) f" `l �.' I 41 . I 42 - L . t- . 43 ...'.: - .',":..::�::::'::: ::::..:�:::::::,..,:-r.,.:.'-:.:�':r .:.:,..:..:" I .. . ..:::;�.;:" : L.:. _.jq. .:..... ."....'....'..�r.'.: . - '. .: - .:,:.. .*. I... I.. I.. .1. . . .....:.,�:.:.:.::...,::,:...:'':...r.'r... _ . � L.:.:: I , ��:: . . r .'.. �'..::_: �' L.'."".:: :::�::::.-'��!�.�:�:;.:-� �;��.:�.'. .'. : !,:,:, % i , , ,r:.,. .. ': . : * : .- r.,. . ,. . L .;. ::�.;. ....r. .:. :1 - : .. - ..L .. . . I- ...' . 1, � I . . . I . .... ... r.' I .. . . .. . I . ,. . �;�� : .': : L.': :; :�r%' * ' ' . : ::: " L :':': *..-' !.!.:. .:'* .r :: : . I .1. ., .:.. -1,; , ',,.:� .�::' _': .' ..: ..!"'":".'::L L : ,. I " . *;'L %:: L - e � � . :r:: I j, , ' . . I ' ., -' L . r. L . .1. .: . ., ;" , . .L::�%:'.: .:r r' . ".. L �;. I _.' ., :�.'. . . I . : .: � r . , . , . I � . .L L, r . '. . : . : :: . . .1 .. I . . ' r . . . . . . I .� . . I . I ...� . I . . I I L I ... " . � ''. r: . ..'. -, .'.' .�' � *�". � : , W' .. ;. � '" 1. ' : ".r,,,.. _' . .. . I . . . I - "_ ' - I _;;� . ., ], I " �' ; I I - . I . ,,r . , . - ��;;_`.��",4,"':�Lj, � L � : L�: ,',, r . ''; r� �':.L' 11, . . .11 � . I � . �' �,'._ ';: �,,',.:r,, I I .. . . � ,r . .�'��..":�"��;�� .-..-."L L I : :' � ;. �.!L � . I r - �:. 11 . I � . . ,:� '. " � I . . I L I " :. , , , � . �: , " _L '; : :.: ..:, - . '�" , -, : !-: . :: ' � - L'..� :` .:L" I ' ' :. . jr '. .. i .. .!..�z . * �.�r - r "; �. �:": �;: -, . :. _' . . . I r. . _. �t : L . ' d �. 1 �:� ' � " . L .. . .r � .:: I L ' . ' . " r � . _L �" . �..� .' ' � " ' ' 1. r L .r � -_ _._.- ._._.__._...r_.. I . ..'. r L . r I I . . � . . I . L I r . ,-f---,, (�r 44 r: : :.. ..: . . . I I L .. . . . � :' . . r : . 1: . ' �4 (_ ' ' � ' ::_.:�'.".:`.L.:.'. r .... . . ::.�:.��:�� "��' L. .. : '. L r L ' - .. . . I . _ . ) r +=*� " ..'. I . . r. . .1 ' - :.i '�!%" r,iW,' _L ' �' .. :' : . ' .L.Uj:.*' r;. �::: '' L 'L. - - _ � 1 . , . .:." ".:.:. . .::: . . r. ' . � "' ,r . ::.: . I . ' 'L ''. ' ,r: ..':' : .:r ":' � - r ' . . . :' "'' 'r, . ' . I i i p " . ,r.. . . . L I I I 1, .1 ". ':.. r...., . � : . . . . ;... . ':.... : � . . .. I.. .. � , I . ': L .. 1. . , : I . ''. '.*".' ' . . I I I � I I . . � :. .. r .. r I . I , .� I I - .,- : .�:�. '. _� I -L i 'r .'.,'%r'. 'r.',!Z",!� .: � '' ::;.,.. *1ko ' A . ': :.' .r . '.. t. , . Zj. :': / ' . , '.:!��'��.;.-%.""�::' L I L , .1 �. ) �. L 130 . '� r - - - . - . 'L , :: . 'j" . I ,�':.: � r.':-! .!�L � " "� . . I I .': r , I I . L I : , . .r _. " r. . ., : L . .. ..,::' :' r , . I � � � . _ .: . Ir � L -. ' ' . , , I . � I . ,� I.: �.:_'. : _1 r . L L . . . . . .� -�' : . r : ' ": , L :, , L" I �. .,� ' .� " . ; '. " . . - �L�" .:'bt'�'.'�j�; ��: . r ,. , . . ' : 'r � . "I - :., � ' . . L I . L I r . I I � - .; KELS I I - . :: � ; . . . � , r: " ':: :' : ' :' I L: �' * . , :r'� : � "' - �' L . L ' I . �� � ..: - - . . - - : I . I . !, N . r . �' r .. . I I . . : . . 1. I . . L � . I . ..!:-.".�::'�: �'*L,i :.' .. c 0 ,. '. . I . . I � I r I �. . , ,N EY'--'��;��`;I'�,.-i I .. I . . � ' - "'I E ��,: L - . ' � . , .' L� r, �� � - L; , . I r I I L I L . W " ' ' . . I . .. .! t L � r..,. _�� , ,,.: ;;�.. ' ' r . . . I .... r 1:. '. '�, - -.!: � � r . � � : � " .'i � 'r '.,t'i;�.',�',i�; ' ..;' '� ..i"" ' ! "" �� `�� � "' ' . . . � . . . r _. L I . L . L . - ' r I ,.r 'L . � . . . I . .. . . . r r , L I ,. . - r . L . . . . . . . .. . I . . L .... r.. . . 586.74 L ,. t . .L..: , � . L 45 L . . .� ,.. .. ; � . I . L ' L .. � , L .. _ r:.,.LL L . .1 . .:r I . .. . I : , : . . .1 .�' . . . L I L' I . . r .. I I - . I . � I - .* - I . r L . , � . . I . L, . " . - . ., . , : .. L - L' 'L . . . . : . I :' 'r_:: r " :' ... * , : � ' L - . ,:. 1. L . I !:Z. :: p .' r . I � I. . . L L . : 'L 1, . . . r L � 1 r � . L . .. ' ,�.r �L ��:' "_: .. , I . . L . L 7 .� L: ; .1 ,L�._ L � � . _ . .. . . . ; � .'� I r'. ,.,.-.,.:., ��'; ; L:t..'r ' _;", I I . . . I . r . L . I 1, ; . :' ' " �; .�'- .'� I . r L L .."'.' L .. di, - , ': . . L r' r . . I .� " �r �' ,L, , . . ' �:! ' " � � : . , , , . , � I ", . - , __ . 'L� r .. , - �' ..' '�� . "��."�....'.:��' : � " r. ' . L . 1; .1 ..- I � ',..��.-.:�"_-" �.'.-..:"� . �: L;"r!:.r , ' i I . I I.;.,.: *. m".. � - � I I , . , , L : I . . . 'r " , . . " . r . . . . . .. L ��.r . 'r".. . ., . I . , .. . . I : : * " , L , . d . . I . . . � ,.. I . I I . L . I . . I . r I r . L I 4 6 ---- ^t 0 I - 11c 31 0 '22 * ' *" - ___ ____ A.I. r L . I I __ 0 '5_/_"l__l__/"o 137cr .. q I I L I .. . q . 1. - � - . . L "I'll" ........ ........ I 1: 13 FR Rp-rNE __s_v 1. 1 -:T ---------- "- ------ Ti 1** I'- - -, . - _. . '. . .. .. , . , . . . I i( '. I Q 48 - ) C) .'-) .1. 't'::.'t C-) L-2 5 ___'�_".._'_______L - -) C) r.-::, / I 1 /9C � 59 78 7, 49 r . . I . . I ; .. I . I . L . r . I - . . 4 . 4 __ - I L .1 I L . L � L . * 1 . I L, . r I r L I . . , � L . � r, � , . . - L . I L ' r � � ' : - : ;� : 1 _____ ---.-- - ---.-... - _- --- .. I - ;..- r: - '. !�L � � I. 1. I .. . 1. ''.... � . .. .r . I r r . , : _'�'� � . ' L: 1 1 - .' � . I .. I . ., . : � , ; :. ' �L ,. ' r - - . . . � I.- :� ': � I r I 1 L ... r '�Lr :' . . L . , 'f �" L : j.' r L, L r L . �' . r L , � �: L'.. _'__"_"'__"___ r I I __. . . '6��'_ ( . r I 50 .:. t- . ) ") :�' f " , r . .. . I .. ) _ L. . . I . ' _ j r - . .. . . ` ... ..:'. I � .i. .L . . . I... I � . : ' . . . r . r . . . .1 .�.:. " r . . .. '.. . r. .' . :�' . ; �.';'� '. . .' . I .. - L . . . I . . . . .. I L , . :: r . . L L L'.'.1 I. . . I ' I C) 5 / ,r 1 1 /9 .,:".,: i '* ,, r:',, () L . '�_ .1. - .,. ...,L I. r � . : . . - . : .1 . I I I .... . . ; I � . . I I.. I r - . . L I L �� . L L .;: *: .. � . � , : : , . .. L . . L I , . ' � : -'- a : , , .r '.. L . . _ , , .r L , � - r �' L. . . . , - .;' ' . - 1. L JJAGO r .�� . � ��."��'�� ��:: ... r L. L 1, - L. , : '�' I . 1. .. I - I I I r I t r' ..L� . .' , : 7. ' :. ' � ; ' ' . , L - L I .: ' ::�_:�,:�� CAROL" r' E 1 '* " -,, r . rrL I � . I . I 1.1! 4 . r r L, L r r . L L . I . .. . I L I : I .... . 1. � : L . � . , : r 1. I L , . L L �� . . I I . I - . 'r I . '' - " . .1 .. . � . I . . - I . . ) 1. 'r L. ., . 857. r3(. 51 . : � . . �: :: _: !:::" . � .' .' ..... L.' r r . . .. r. . ..- ... . . '. � .. I . I . I L . . : I , , _�. :: ,,L r ' . . : , . I I . . I I.. L ... � . , : � . - . . . r : :..: : . . . . . . *. , - : : :; :.�L ..L: *: ' . :� , I ., ., . . I I .. . .r ,. , . . . r . . r , . I . . I . . . . . . . � . I r . . . I . � I . . . . . . , . .' . L : ' : " r . , . , ".L . : . ; , . . � , r ': , r . , �r; I , . � , . . , . . . . ' : . . .. L . I . . . r I � .: L L r ,� , I � � .::� . . r - . , I � . .. , � . � . . . L I . ,! L .. . I . .' i . " . �L I ..!� ', ; I ! �' ' - L a L I . , I . L. . . . : I L , . :. , . r � L . . � . � . r : L � 'r' ' : 'r . L, I I - : . . . . : ., , ., L' �:; . : ; , � .. :' L ' _'.:� . 4 . , , - ,. i . . L . .. 1� r I I I . . * I 'L - I . . .. . I I ; .., : L . L . . . _... . I - 0 S I 1-7 " ' - '-'- ' _.- '_" 52 0 t..1 ' 1 ' 7 * n ", :.I f"-"-'-'-'-'-'*'--"-' ...... -"-'-'-'--'--' , L- - ' , � I � " - '-UEANE • I 'E'-"C'FI'RL='-----'----"-"-----"'-'"---"""' _ - '"' 3 0 tj C. a c - 1 ) , "'-"-'-- I '' I C ' 53 � 5 4 C) C) 1 -1: -'- C) *-, a - - uj - 1= () ,%:-::), / 1 1 / 9 0 . %57 11-3 a . Gj: I r J; .15 q ... I . . I : .. " 11 L . L I . . a. LL_ I . . I r . I p .. I . I.. . I ...Lr I :'Ll . I � - I L . . I - r � : L' I . . . . � L I - . : .11 . L .� � I I . 'L I . '.:; L� " : ' I ' I . r ". I . . r I . I I . � I : r : . I . . . . . � I I I I __.____._____._. __'. _. ...." . � I I I 1 57 I . I . I . . r . r . I I L , * * , .3 j ) I , .' c. . %_.� .- -, -"' *- if ' . � . I I . I I . I I - "k � . I . . , - I I 9LU 5 :�, 9 . . . . 1. . . I . I I I . � � . I . � . , I � . , . ... . m CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0002 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY IDEFRIOD 54 0015055 r` 00 1 50'G 561 S-i m 05/11/90 MICHAEL RYAN 1,G32.43 1,604~7K5 41 5�1021�(y 10 bo L 1:5 05/11/90 ELAINE FU-LLER milx 18 1,5 %237 05/11/90 DONALD W SKALMAN r- 54 0015055 r` 00 1 50'G 561 S-i m 05/11/90 MICHAEL RYAN 1,G32.43 1,604~7K5 �� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS 1o,,, |/'| FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 0003 , o o . I . . ,-- I ______...______,_.,___ ,. i*/ vy��v5' oc�/zz/�0 RICHARD C D -,~~...~ e GREGORY L STAFNE 1 520 19 ,,, ,..�!. f-.:� 4. " 4 1. _... _.!,t,..�, .;..p R, I..'. : . , � r _:, �, ::i, " .. � � .1 1, � �� I � . , * 1 I �!�, ". ,ji.___ I . � - I .---------. __ 1 480. G , �Ll_ � vJ V0l�06 - .. , .. . 1. , : ;,., ', ". �� . ,_3*� -_ - l - - -' - - '`^~~` '~ '�"�'''`^ z, +96. 24 n m ,y o 22 �� 14: I 0 0015064 05/11/90 FLINT D KARIB """ ', .. -- ... ..... ... ......'.... .. �Pm�(: , Q I.. .. -, , 1 590 48 0015067 05/11/90 DAVID J THOMALLA 1,899 35 --- --------- : , , "...... ... 1. �.. .".. . I �_ ,-� . I � � � . I, I .. �, 0 � . � � . .." . . . . . .: . , � . 1, , . I :, : : - . '' \ � ���' ��' .1 . , . .�:::�. -�.� ::-::�...1-:1.. .... - = : , : '' .,� - .�,-. :- :�.:�.- ,"! ,: ,, i - , , . ::. w I ,11 .. �..,, .:: : .: .::.. :,*, :.: : , , a - - . , � , , : . . , � , I � , . r. .. .1. .. I I I...: � I ) � -:��.�,.. 1. I � . . ..�::. , I., ::..' . I.. . I I ,. . . .. .. �'MEEHAN 2 -:` :' ' �': : , . -�:_,.. ,__. ;, ��. I. 1. I .:. .,�. 9 ,�,,-,,,!-�-��.,,�,--.,- �,--.-�.,, �-".,-,--�,,��:,',,.*!�,,,.�.�-.,,�,.,:JAt'IE : 0 .( 50. :. : I.. I : 32 ...:.�!;��:_.__:�:�,�._ 74 �:,:�* �:.. , . . : . ��. . , .� I., '' , .: . ; I.. . , 0 5 / 1�1 / . C :_.�: ,- ''. . ;;., ., I � .... .,, .::" . ,. - .. . , ., . W. . , I.. � , Is:''. ::.:.. ,: .." � ... ,:, , , , . . . : '. � : - I. I �, * , , . . 1 ,� � I °1 ''---'� °�'^^~�= Jum �� n��m»u�w ��4�l�8—'-- _ 07. 3 8 f �.-,... -.!�::�;: -,,-, �: .,w . .�:�.�.�:::..L��::;:,::��-�::�:�:.:::::�:. ... .. W . ..... . 1 /111/90 -:1 � -,.,- . ". � ��, �,; AM ES �',L � M EMEAERTSON' * L I..: * 1. . |�� / I Q - - �;,_,. 1 "'� ,. - � 1 ,:�. : ���: : : ' L I , I L L . - � , _ L ,. , . r: t: , 1, . L .., �. � . , - , ,� _ .. ��:�lll .."., L . , , � a I I �� C T . 7 �� , 11 r � r , L I 1 , � .,. � . " , z . , ", ". j L ��,,,,!`_;. ��; .. 1, % . I . I .. . .1 1 9 40 56 � � -`��'--� Q. . .! . L .� .. - - - - ) I.: C . : . L W.' � E3 ' L I ' . : . . . . — ' 5 ..,. . . .. ,,r � - � .� L - j .. :. r *, . . . r L . I. ,-.'': _:.. � L:. : L' .. r . , r L I I . I. L I L.." 'L .r . jL .. '. -.::, L . . � � ' . .:. I - _, .. - _1 % j . /'90 , � . _ .05/ . � - ., -, � I L . � I : r , , . - - I . . , . . . .. . . . . - - � _ ' L � . ;, , . . I : �- ,�� I . r I L . 1�� i�,,,,_. - _ - _'. - .,. - , � A -�L * FLAUGHER .. .. . ., r - - , IM Ej ., j , I ... r... I L . . * - �.-�-, r ,. :� '� ,, - ,Y , :� - : . I , :� *� r r 1 . : '- I L 1:, �., r, , .' r ,, . " .. I . j _ , . r t . : �. � _, �-_..,,r,�,� � a, � . r . j r . I I . L I I.. . . . . . I . : i I ' 1 1 4 70 L .11 . . r. r j. ': L. I L . . . I I r r : I . I L � . . . . I . . L . L � . r % � L , - " .1 . ; � .��. - I � . � L . I - . � _ . , .1 �: L 1. . L% L %7 .1 I r 1� r r ., ! ,. _ _,,r r �.. I . L ,,,-" . , - , . I r' . . _ . . . . .1 j r L . . ... I' I X-1%, I . : . I I L ^ )0 1 5 � 0 97 C '. 1. L... ---1 . I L - . --. - -.--------------,--.--.-..,-.--. -..--_l-.-,-.- - -1--- I � I � I - I � .. I . . I , I I . . . . L L I .. . I L. I . . . " " . I. 1! I . " L I OC-)04 L. I . I I I I . .. I ., I . ,� .. 11 I - . � I I . - . , I . . ": . I . . : L" .1 . I : ,� L �;. ; , � - �:, " " .TODD�-:` CK - I .1 I :L ' ,:",. -,�L .... LL 11 :' ". .:_L,,.L,.. I , .11'', ,'. I � '. � L 'L �.L . . 1 1. ... �. ..". . w : .7 r 7"�' _ _ . , _� - - �j� L'. �.,-, L I . .. ' 1 :':.._�.,:�!:_' L. T:-"',:"' 'I 'L ' �: ;,.�;: � , EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND ,.PAYROLL CKS _ I . , . L L : _ : . : .� ;L L L � - . . . . . L I I ', ''::: .' 0 1 4 .. I . I . I . . . I - .- I .1 - - - - - --Tl 1 7r3-C--)' '--- Q %-I . : .. . I I ; : , ... � ... a , , L � . . . . I 1. -L . I . . . . I . � . . I ,. . . I L . L, . . ?, _ OM - ' . L ' ' ' - . - , - R R L LTNDDL- .--. , .. .1 .�. - .. - ''... - 1.1- . -- 1 -- '.., I . � I i - I I I I I % .. . - 1. ----- 11: - I I . �, . . 7 � I �:.m. �'. � ., ". .., " I I - 1, 1 � . '. - . .. ; ��. �: z,::;'': F.::a � �,��:,:�-'o, .��.�,::,. �. ; :.. I . :.; ,!, �: "; . I A - MOUNT 0 � - - 2 , .. - . - I 11 I . : .. ,:., . . 1. 1, .�. . . .: ,...: - ,., I .... f �' � '': �.:.:, .: r. ... .. , :: -, m . . I 1 � . . . : * , * - I.: I � . . :11 .: � .. I I .. . , ....,.-:. "., ...-I... - '.��.. � , ... . � - '' .... . . .., 1. I , - I I I -'�,.:,� . -.. . .11 . . 1, " .. . � . . , �. I I . I.. �...:..'. . I..., ". I ,..:,. .�'..- . - -1. . - .". , :., � '': ,:I .. �. 1. '': " � ::., ... � I . .. �,:�,:�!�,,�, �.., "."'....''..'' , 1: I '. .., - , � 1. .:.;��:�.,.,,*��.,:.".�",:;.,�,,,"-� i . . , -;i�,: , �-.,,,- ,-: .,..,. - . ,�.. I q I - � I I � I '. I � I - I ...'. �-: � . I . 1. �.� I . I . . .. ��..��: � �: .. " --`��!�:�,; - �.- , i 1, I -� , , "'' - ; - I I ., : . : . . , " - .: :��....:: * , . . . I . 7 . 3 .,.::. I � .1 ... I... : . -��''l.,.,.*::'l, . - , - . ": -1 I ,� �i.::��:;��.�:������!:�i:��ii�:;;�������.����.: :� � � -*, . - . . : , .�.,,,- ...: ..� :,... � , , - I 1.� I : � : I.:. . ''.. .: . . ... .. . _;.:.�.;,.:.. . .: I'll''. . l , , �.., . ...:, � .. 1:': :��, � . . . . . .. ,. � -:,:�- ��: : . :. . . I . . I . . I . . . . . . I - ,. . .. . . 1 ..-- . I . , '� � . . , :!. ".�.:,.:: '. ,,.� - . , ; ,, ,,:; , �!:.,.. � . - . . 0 , -: , ''. :�.;.� .:� ..* .., . . . :-. . . . '. : �: .1 � , :. . . . . . .1 I . .-:�' - � I . � . . . .. ��-:` ::. o.� . -,, X; , '�:;", � .. ;�,', . . .. .,., �, .� ��, .1 . - -�� I. -.--�,,� :-:, �,.��. I � -.���',.:.,i.�;�,.�,',����",:,-,::��:: "I '',:�::,::"�-:,�.. , . � � �,,,. . :. .: --:-,-,-.,-,�:�:�,,,,.-.-' , .`�,!� ::.. :,:"" I I I I . : -i:�:,:�,-!.�, : �,.,�,-- � ::���..,-",...",.-.".�:,-.,��;��""� .". . . - !�,�., ,, ,* I 'I, "' , - - - 1* 1 I..,....: �,�.,,�:: e- � -�, .. ... . , � � ". -,, 1. . ... I .. V� ,.. . . '11. I ..... � -;�'] `:�� , ":: -�.'�-:;:, , '. �, lw- . .. ;'- I I � ;: I , I I . , I � . I - al I , � .. � 1, . I - � . . I . . . .. . , �'-�- � ; ,::, : ,.: I I �: ,., � 1. I . ... i I .1 I , .. � I .1 I -, :�: � , .,:;, ,, I . .,. ., .: �: :. ��'. :,� �:, w � ;; �, . . 4 38 0 , 4 I � . . I , � I � --- . I . I --- C -0 1 YO 1 5 8-4 1'r . I . : . � . . - . I . � .. - � %6- - 4 7 r -) -i --.J / C � : 1. , ,:,: ,� � � I ,-',.: ,.. . � , " I 11 I I 1. - I ,� �, .'r, I . . � �:� . .. I I . . � . . . .11 . -- . I . � �, . . . . . I . I .. I : .1 . . . . I -- - , . I . .1 -. T --.---.--, 1. . � - . J U - D - l' . . 07- 5 .., , .-'� ....� � .. . - - - 1 , 2, 1 ". ; . , . , I : : . , , . , I :�, � ., : . 1 ,� . . 9 � : . , F . L I I . :� . 11 . . . : 1 t . i , , ,, � ;� : I . p !� " ; . � , . � . . L . . . : . . L , L I � : . : : : ,, I . 9 - . , , - :,:�: - . . , : � ! - L: ' '::� ' ' '::' �,�-��,� �;, ' " , , I 4 � , , . . . .1 i�� , �-, , , . : � L . . :, L L 1 � : -, '. , . . 9 q . : ! , � , , L L , : ! . . . , I , I . I . . - - - - . , : � , , I L I L . 9 1 . . . . I I . I . L . . 6 - . 0c) I 5C . . 95/1 1 19-0 KENNETH G Hn- I DE FR 1 2 1 LA 1 . 7 . � .. . : ''... � . I..,.. .. �..... . � . L L I I ". : , I . I L � ,� . . . �. �. . . . . I I 1. . I I I . I . . . L I L . . . L . I . I I .- ''. - I... I I. . . . . . I I , 1, I 1, I L . : � . I : I . . ., � . L� ' , : . I . I � I : � I . I . I.. ,;.:'' "wL.- - - I-- " ., - I., �, I. . . . . .�o � � 1 7 ' . 1: .:: ::! � ; ' �: L" L . 1 � 0 . I . � - 71 ` ': - - -';�!', . ; �'�: "--'�'��:!�:: L '� : � ' 7 0 �, "� & � : �: -. : : . " ;::! ' � . .r . 1 ; i . . , . 1 - ol:.. - -.". , . :. , . ,.. �� , � ,: �: ..* , . . I . . , I .. I L I � I � , " � :, �:�: �,." ' ;! : . I �- . , , , , . . . I � I , , L� , , , , _ . I I L I L � L , . . , . � a . : ' L ' I " I ; - . . q . ' -�� , - I , . I .:. . .. :�: � , as uj ------. , . ------- - , . . 40 " 8 . I I . I . : . . . . . I I . .. . . . . . � p : - . , . I . . . . . . I : , . I . . L 0( - 15086 I . ,.) I . . L 'o . I L . I . ... - I .1. . I . :. . I I . . 1". � . L I 1. .. 1. I . . L I ,... � , .. ''L. . . : � I �, I I . I , L I . . . I . . . ", . . .� . ; . . 0 L , I � : : � , , . L , . , L I : � '. 3 /I IL ' I L iq () L :::. .., : . I . � � , . L . I L.. � . I .. - t'l --., . L I , I " , I ; . : � :,�,.":!:�",:�',.�.,..,-",.;, : . L _ :1 !; --, � z'�:� . . I L . . I . , . . I . I . L , I . . ,; . . . . � �� �.. : . I �. !' : : � . ' ' L I : . I � I �'. !! .-. . , . ' L . . I I . , , 1. . . . . . . - . . , , . � , L I L I I . . I ,L I :��. : , , , " ,,".<,-,� ,.' !'��.- j ,,'�I� 1, J - % I ./ ' L ?,' 1" - ' . '. ; � "� � . ' . I I : L , ., .. L .. , :�. �' 11 ,. � . j I I - *� . - . - , . " . I . . I . . . 1 �.. I �e..:..:� :,,,i�,- ..", -�.M:,,��,'(;H . i .,� ,- . I I . LEBE i p I L .�,..,� 11 L, L , ! , � � , . - d. . . ,.!:. . ., * - .1 .,.: . ,. : � 1. . . I j . . . - . - - -%4,70 L 9 I... .. :. .. . � .. . , � . 1. . .1 ' L .,! ... . -� 1. '' I . I * - I � I.. : . I . - I I .1 I , I -�.,. . I :.,-�,..., L , 7 1 .1 L 1. - L.. ::i� ". . . . . - 1. ,. 2�; , �� . ;-�:,�' .. .1 ::,.. :- L L. I .., .: , , - _ L � I ; , - L .. . , . � , - I - . I I I ...,-��;�,. -�,� . ", �.: . t I . L , ��.,,-.,,,,� � ; I '..., ; ;, -�; , -� ll�t-,,': -, --:�-;��"" �,,,-"..,"!�, - � !:�'; ." - , - .�i. ,,�,-�..,,.�.�,;-. '. L . I L . 10 . I .... I I ...- " I -- ... . ----'-----'---"- 01-7 . -1 0*97' !. . .'. I �'...: L� I . 1: I L ". .� z,;,. .�- , . i: : t. .. :",., : , : I . L I 1. L: ,: '. I . . I I . % 'L L I . I'. � I . -.- . �,L '�-,;'.' �. ,:: 1: L!:'',:,..:;. � �;. :t- -,;;. ". 1 I I L I I L 1- . -- . I , :1 ,� �' . . . , �, `!'' ' " . I - , i , I I - U157 . 'r , " - fJ-7 , '�) - "-"` " �� . ... I - L ----- I --.---, . . I . -.-.--..--.---..'-...-- ....... I I 0 0 ll L I I . 1 121 .. C () I t .5 08. 8 -) .1 . . L I I -I-- ) (-I:::, 1.1 /90 - 5/ - - .1 - --.w. - �' **,---"`-4-,-:,-- . . I - - ------- � L -4 %.j I I 336 . 17 13 1 I - I I . I I . L I : . I L I � . ' L I I . I I . .. I . .. - 11 '. - q .-I.-I.. 7 0 . . , 1, I �:: I ,- . . .. :1 � ., : L , - . . � I ; �. , � L . . �, � . ., . I . . - 1. � L . � L : L " ,- -::;:: I I - ----','!!�;.. � - ------- --- ..- L W A il l . .... 1. -.L :�;:'� --,.. I � - - v - -. . . � .,::;!, �,��, . : : . - 1. L , ":', �L .'' , . I - �. � ,':' � �..,! ;;f:�, '' , ��'.: ,, .- . *.�,�:"::, ,�.�, 1, :.' !' - % ,�� ; L : - � - ,. 0. r. I -- I - . '. L, I !..: L ". .!: .,L I ..� , . . ;'' '.. . j . : ;:�' .:: �: L " * : - . , . . '.. .., I I I - L L L�L � ' " .. ,.. 1 '. - .'' ... -.---...-. . . ...... . � . � P 14 . L . . . L I I . . . . 1:1 ♦ - L ' I L I �j 4 (..) �f : I . L . I . . . . . ,� :;' � ' . � : �;:! I . . :' � ': C) 0 1 1 !:: 4- '" .; . , .. , :. . .1. I: ''::.::, . .:::�:.. ., : , : , : , . . . , . � . . I !; ... . .,.'':��":,':.:�:.:-'.'�.:. �. .. . : : �, . I -'. � . : :: � . I...:, : .. . - �:.� I : .. ., L' : , .'.' - , - . . I :: , , . . . :., : � L . � ., . L � L . :. ;/ I I .. I=- , . ,". () t5 411.1 , .. ,:� . '-� ., .. . _L '... .. ; L .:. : 1 I I ' L %..., . , -,:., ,......��: ;, �.`.�..: I .. ",.:,. " e -1. , :...,�, � . - - .�!�. _. ': : � � %. � . . � I , L , , : L, I I I ".. � , . .; : . � L� 'I " � .1 - .�.: " - . . ,., ''. .. . I �. . I . . . I I I . I I I L I . ,11 L .. i 1 : �., � , : . . I I , L I . _ , -1 I , .:!:�;�.,'�.-','.-'.�-.*�,,��""",,��,�"- L L 9 4 1 1 a 08 15 . . _ 1 I ......, � .... . :: L. ;- ,:.::., - . .-.,.: .::;,-,. --�- .; -..., -� .., :;::::: ... :...��: 'L. ox * . . . -': . � I ...... . . , .. . ...� : !..: - ''. I - I .. � I : . .... .. . , I. : I . �:;:,�::�. ..:;�,`�L ... �;: .. �� . . .:: 7., -::-,�t!,, *.�" . -, � .�,,.�. � , -.11 - ��'.* ;,.-�,--, -.,�::" ".., , -, ,�' . ,,:,.�::�,! - -::� -,.-----.-.;,'--�* - � . . , . I I.. : .* * .- ., .�: .. , .''. -- -' . - ll� , - .. ,�:- *11 i .. i : "..,.�' . '� : L:L�� ;�;. .:,... , :: ::.,�' I ....: I..... , .,.. � . ., ...", � , � -�- ., :, 0�r ::. L:'::L. . �-:�L'� ll�l ..,%'.,..��"--., "-I , , � L: C. : :: , :..".." . ,.t, '.... . . :,,� , .. ��:.��,.- ,-.--,-`�';�i.� i �"�.�',,�' . "-. ,,, - ,. " , -Z, � . , - � L ,� I �11.1- ..���, .,.,f, ".." .--�i�� .,�, : I '. -i� ... . - 1. �.:,-." ': - :.�14�:: ". . ., ,. I -L ,. r ,:,::; �:' , *: .j .. , ,,��.".., I. . � I. . � : � �, - z .." "; " : I �: ! : ::'-':�. -.,::�...;:::� .f;,",.,��,".-,"'.. I �: .��: , -,' :, " i-.-.,' - !-'�".,!p e�-: �: ''; L �.; - !, . . ,..,. t'. �, - -- -, - "-' ,I .,.. �:,: � � : : �: - $7 � '''.. �... - ...:. . . . . '. ", � . . �:: :- ' *1 16 - � � . I . I I . I . . . .. - . .1 .... . ... ��.= ... -- -) (-) i 0 9 :) (_) . I ,.. �. I - . �. , �: - I . - - - - - " . -I' .05 1 . - /_9 0 '.. �L . jq��,;:,: L I . !. ,::,, -� . ;. I .. , .. I.., :. , .: :1 - , . � "IL ' � � . , , , . , :L .1 �:'-,,�:' L' , , :-':!� . , � � -� L , ,. , .:; . . I L . . � I . L . . �--,..� .i.� ,� ,- , .- . ::: "� L ';�. . . I L . � . I I , . , . ,;- .., . . . - '' ", . - I ,:, : . . -1. �.� I ; L . "" �. I ,! _ '.."'. L I . . '. A '- ' - , -- - . . .1 . --. I . -- I - I- - ---� . I I - L .,L . BRY P\T : L ; - I . L .. . , . - . .. ., - - ,- ---_._.- -----.-.-..---.--.- I I ... , .11, 1 1 2 *,,;iv, . . 18 . I - . . L. 0 0 I 5 0 9 I � q .* ...... .......l. , . .. . I.. -.-'--,------�---- L C) 5 / I 1 /90 I .. . - I I L . DAVID P LUTZ D" I --% -.% " I %.:� 8 9 1.f� I - " 1 9 'LL r .. - : I..:.:,:.;.-.'."' - ,.,.:::::..:.:::" - -'�: . ... : �.�L�:�� � -� ' . . . � ,: m r . ' r - . : . - , - ��i���- , ..:� - . !,:.: m. I '. .. . . L . �, .., � ::: " . . L: _ ' : .; L :' 1 L , - '' L , - .. L . . . . I . I . - r .: � , .: : � : I , ..� ' ' . � . ' - ' ' : ' L -' . 1. I � I -1. -- . -- ' ------ I I . . . . I .1 -- - -----------.- . - OMN - . L : : .. :':�:L : �: , :�' .�� e. t , . , ; ' � -. - .�.�) 6 . .' : . L , . I . . .. .... . . L ' . .. ., , . . I I . , . ". r r . . L I= ,1% =i . I . . : . . . I . . r . I I r .' t .1 :; L L ..' L'', r.. -1 V ". L r - - - ... '. . :.;.: .,;:��:i:�� �. . : , I . . . , _ � . I , I . "I . ':. .. . I ,:., , I L . - . '. . . . . . I r , � ; :':. r . .:L. .. , . ... . . :- :, ; .. r r , , - . - , : - �.. l:� �'- - .:,!:!:,.." ...:,.�. � . wd,:, �:,:,.... . ":'' -'. r.:,,.'. ' - . . . . I . I L . I I � 11 . . I .- r L.� : . : L . j .. . r r .,r. r '*, - L . . . . . I . . I . r . . .1 I . L L - ' - . : � '. ... . . I � .. - :� :� � ' : : : L .r .: . . y L " . , : w I : * � . . ;��: I - I . ' L ' ' I . I , . :!.::":, U _.�' .1 : : L : L . : ' L � . . I . . . . . , . . 1, ..'. . . , , i . :� . � I . . I .;:� ��', . " I r I., . . '. I . .1 :. . -.: .. . I .4 '. .' r : , . , . r . ..: : 1. .L I . . L' I L .� r . 11 � ' :,; ,;. L ,. . I . . . . I . : : ' ' - 'KL A U!S. I N r G ". . � L . .'' " L' .1 r ENR F' " '� - ' ,,._, r. I � . I �. .. �:.!., . . . L I �, I, , . L' . . - ". I . - ... I I . " L r � : , I . r I L - , � :. - . . . - .. I , - :. . I � L ' r : . . ... I r. . I .1 I . �, '' L, ..., I.., L.: � 4r,, p, � -'.. I I I r � L :",:�. � �- L. '! . , I . . .r I I � ., , I . . I . , I �'. . 1. L. '. r r �" I . ":::r:': � . ,� r . . : �: :.: . - - -� . . . . . L . .1 . :, r ' L . . . ," :� r: .. �r . � :.. - ' . I 577is46 . I ' . 21 I : .r.., . m". I ,::;, , ., r , . I L . L .:, . L.....L.. . .. r L: : :,rj::�' : ':,'L'* . : : :: I : ,, .� : :; . I ... . : .::. � .:�. - . r. : r � .. . . . : . . : . .. ::: ��L . : : 4 ;.: :..: � " ... : .....'. J L:��: -: . . . . ! .:: , :; � �. . : . I . L w .. r, . ... . ., . . . r. . I I - L . . . . L I . . I . . r L � . r . :; , . I .... . I � . r . 1. . " . . .. . L:. �. . I . ..., .. ..r L ,. .: I . I . I I . r r , r - I . ,. I I L . . . � I I L . . . r . . I . r:: , '. ., ,; 1. ll. :�, ,r . . r. - I . ::! 1, . , : .1. I . ..r ..,.. L .. ,:' � :L:;'.: r �, ,:," � .1 - I. ::� r I., . . - .. I r, 1. .� 1, �: .... I I - I I �l .. .. . I I , - . : , I , L , I . . L . v I. L" , r - I - � .r '.. . . . . . � , . I e , . . 11 . .. . . I . . - 'r . . , . . � . . I ; .:. i r . " � . . : - � . . :� . , , r I L r . . I r .. I r . : I . .. . L .. . : I . I . I I I r I , t L % r , , � . I . . r . . L . . , L . I 'L � ,. L . r I r I I . .. I J. . . I . L .., . r 1 . L. r, . I . 1, . . . 22 I L . . . . . � . l - 6 il l 5'=- ,3- �� -- - - , , , - � C 7 - 4- - - . . � I -(. - 0- . T57-1 / . I . I . L � L' .. . r � . r L . ., I . . _7 . . . - - � I - �, - -- I I . J OOM % - , I .. . - r I . L I I . I - z�--.,---.-.---..-..-.._. _., F. I f Al le-!N %4-;� 23 1 I -------7----..,-,---------�- . 1 2(--)4 " %-j C) 25, L I L L L � L I r . . r I . I . . . I . L: , .: ..:.,:.::,.:.�.; . L . . L , :- I., . . I , . ' (Jilm")l 5 0 9 5,.:,r I I I . q I . . I ... . .... , . . . . L':., . ... . . .:: , , . I r r . .. 1� 'L ., �.. : - ..:.'. I .. . ..'�. 'r. . r .. . -:!� � . r .: .. L. 1. . . �. - --.. ... r : � � " • ".'.'. :.. � . . C) 5 / 1'�jr / 9 C) , r ' r .. : 'r . �. . I I . I . . L . . ., . .: ... ... L. � . . I L L I I � r � I I r r . . I . � I � I , 1. . r . � . L r D L I I . I . � - . . r I% . . r. - .1 L, . . z I . :1 r . I . I ' '. '. : ' . r" ERICK D 0SWiQL I • 294. 8 4 . 27 , : . I I ,:.-...,... , .. . L . .. I I . . ' r 1: I L r L . r & I. % I . . . , . L .. . . . � - . I � . I . I . . . r, L r r � . . . L . . . I . -=- --.- (-) (..) , ') ) ... T .... 28 . I I - �-;- a/ 1- 1 - 1 7 - 9 - - - - -) . . (i L . . r N U IN H L i) L F�REP -ER"G----- ___ --,------,---------- '--""---*--------- '----'--,--Lr",_, -_., . _. I I --- - -" �.)l 2 . 5 G � . . 30 L ^ )0 1 5 � 0 97 C '. 1. L... ---1 . I L - 0 5 / I 1 / 90 � . I . . , 70 4 E 8 ' , , - 47 .. , ' , I " L . . . . I.. . I - I � .. I . . I , I I . . . . L L I .. . I L. I . . . " " . I. 1! I . " L (D 32 . ...... .11,111, ' . - . . L : . : :.;.',.."".,: ,. L ", , I ' .' I L. I . I I I I . .. I ., I . ,� .. 11 I - . � I I . - . , I . . ": . I . . : L" .1 . I : ,� L �;. ; , � - �:, " " .TODD�-:` CK - I .1 I :L ' ,:",. -,�L .... LL 11 :' ". .:_L,,.L,.. I , .11'', ,'. I � '. � L 'L �.L . . 1 1. ... �. ..". . w : .7 r 7"�' _ _ . , _� - - �j� L'. �.,-, L I . .. ' 1 :':.._�.,:�!:_' L. T:-"',:"' 'I 'L ' �: ;,.�;: � , . I I L 4 80. 00 33 _ I . , . L L : _ : . : .� ;L L L � - . . . . . L I I ', ''::: .' . I . .. .",� �: .:'. . I L . ' � L � . . . I I , . - 1. . L 34 � I � . .... . . . I - ... . I cs c I � . . . -. -- - I . . -- .-. . 5 t �- 1 � . ...m I . I . . . I - .- I .1 - - - - - --Tl 1 7r3-C--)' '--- Q %-I . : .. . I I ; : , ... � ... a , , L � . . . . I 1. -L . I . . . . I . � . . I ,. . . I L . L, . . ?, _ OM - ' . L ' ' ' - . - , - R R L LTNDDL- ,: . . . . . . - -F, to ..- . --- ,-.' ,-. ...... - . - , � :1 - -, -,.r , f-� I I (-) t. o . J. -_j -- 40 35 . :.. .j : , . ::.�: :� -!., ;,. , , �. . :,''., I �. . � :!* I .. . � �.' - ' , �. . ,:: �- - rl . I ., . ..... L . . . . I ; LL., . L L : I - - . ; , L . I I . I I : � � I I L . I - ... I . . ... ,. . ,% . I , 1 : ..'', ''' L I L ::;: i . , � , .� L" .::' , , . , 1, � ., I L: 1, ' . j : L'. I : I L ��, " L: .11 . . � : ,; .11-11.1 , I ., ��.. � ��` ,,.,...,; , " ..,. ., ''.- .. I I I ' L' I .. L ... I .":. ::. .'':. I . � . , a. . � "; . -Z . . ,:.:'' 11 .. � :,.. ... .:':' ' ' : , , �� �L � �,�:�,., I : � . - . . . - . t I . ..� - ..:: . ., "; , ,: � :C, �, - �, - - : ":, �.�, -�. ��; � .1 , -:,. ;; '. �, , : , � .. : i; : , , :.�,: -� � - - - ;!.'. ��: ;r :'�� � � . "'., t , . '�.�':' � - . . �.L I I . : I ". 9 !ffte� . --- -- . I. L - �� -#- ) .-; / I . . . L _L ,�, � .,. . .1 ,. . ! - I . . . , : : L . I � ,".. � , " . : . � I I . ; :,. �.; I I . . .1 L I I : . . � . . I I . 1. . I " . : � . . - " !;. � :' L - . I 7 37 . L I I . I 1 9 . I 9 4 L '� . . ". : , .. I , : . 1. . I . * . 9 . L , ,� 9 .. , . � : ... � . * ' - - 1 .' L . � . '. . . . . . - - . . :. . ..9 :. , , . �. � � :: :: � : :, - : .: : , - " , L . L .;.: ' :, '. . . . .' � '. " . 9 ' ' . � . ."L . .: . _ L , . . . I . . "----- L . L . . L . I .1 I .. . I I . . : . �l � 9 L L ... . .1 . L , ' L : L' 9 " 1. . I . . . . . . ,. : I � .; , . . - : � , , ,:, . I I I . . I .. : : L : :L � " , ". . . L . . . I , . . . . : : : - ---- -- - - � - �:��"-. ..-i -1 :-., - � : ' ' L 11 � .9 . I . .. ... . . I . � '. . . I w . I 1 9 I . I I I � : " L, ,; ,�, ,�; . - .': I . . . ,� , . . , , � 9 . 1 ;, L . . .. ; 9 I 9 . - . I : , . ? � � . I I L . � � ; ' " �� � L - ; t ...9 - �� ."! ' " ' ' 9 : .,. � . ; . ". , .. I : . , , . .: . . ; � ' . I I . . L m : . . ; I L : e ' : :. , � L" L . . L -.- -9... - -.-.--- --- --- ---.- .." - .. 99 � .. 9 4 38 0 , . . . . � . . . . I . . I . L I . . . ., . � . . . . ., ' L . ,. . I .9 . , .. L ..:_: . 9 . J , , . . . ' L . . . . ( I . ') � ;4j: . : . � :. , : . . _ . L . ' _ . �� 9 - L . 1, , : . , ' : ,. :: L , , 9 '.':- . � :�' L . . . - : � : ::x �- +* . . . , ,' , , . . I . . . . , .. , . C.) , 1 . : : : : . .: ,: .: . :: . .. ...- L.. , - . I . . . . . , . - . 9 L ' L.! .. 1 . . . ..: � . :. ::�.,. - .. .. - - : , .1 � � . , : :: . �.'..* :. : . - - -� '."�':,.' _-, .. -:.. .., L - :: , � , " ' L,L � �� :�i�, : � _. . . . . . I ... , �i� -*"- , -, i�. .,. I .. � .. , '. . I � . .. . . . . : .L L . . I . . . �. . 1 - : � : : .., ' L L ' . , : . � - . . . . . . . L 0 5 / L I L 1 / 9 . 9 . . . : . � I . . . . I : . , �' : L � ' . ., .. ' .:". . , . . . I I . , 9 . .1 . . I 1 9 . L :" *-. :, , - , :� , I I , * 9 . : . ,�� , I , . . , . 9 , , I - .; I -1 ,. . . . L L .1; . . , ; . 9 . I LL , : D - , u :CHARME I ,. %. - -'� - � L . . . -,,�� ��,:::; - ,�� �, ;,', ,��!. � � � '.,,i�i� : : , �., - , - .. , �- �. �..-. . 9 2 5 a 9 0 391. - - . .. . . . .. L .." . .��j�- . . I I . :' ' : ' , - . . :: : � * " .; :, . . � : :: �* .� . .' : b ; , L . . . , ,.::,., ::, "... I ..- 9 . . . �: .� 9 1 . .�.--.� -��-".:� 9 �:; : : ` : .. . . , : 1 . ' ' L -* :: ., L, . .. I L . : .: : . : . . . : � . : ; ! : . . . . . . . � . . , . : , * : : L , : . , . . L . . . . . . 9 . . . . i :: . I . . . , . . . , . . I . L . . -- I - - I .:, L , .� - ' , ' ' ' ' ' � . . I , - . 9 1 , . , : � ,-- I..- . . , . . :: : . . . . . L 9 1 9 . I . . I . 9 . . � I . � : : , : . I . I I I . . . . . . . .., , .-'� ....� � .. . - - - 1 , 2, 1 ". ; . , . , I : : . , , . , I :�, � ., : . 1 ,� . . 9 � : . , F . L I I . :� . 11 . . . : 1 t . i , , ,, � ;� : I . p !� " ; . � , . � . . L . . . : . . L , L I � : . : : : ,, I . 9 - . , , - :,:�: - . . , : � ! - L: ' '::� ' ' '::' �,�-��,� �;, ' " , , I 4 � , , . . . .1 i�� , �-, , , . : � L . . :, L L 1 � : -, '. , . . 9 q . : ! , � , , L L , : ! . . . , I , I . I . . - - - - . , : � , , I L I L . 9 1 . . . . I I . I . L . L 1 . . . . I . 9 x 13 4 1 1 1 ... ., - - - - �. . .... . ----- ::,:::::, � ��: �:- . . .I 1, 1. .- .;...,. � . . . - & -.-- .. � : .. -� . . .. : , . - : - . . . ! - �, - . " 0 I . : . - . . - i , N I , . . , i � , , .�: ��'.',� . . . I _ . ... , , - . � .,� i � . , � " '. ., � . , . . . � . . I . - - . . , T, . , � ., . . . I I , . - . : � . . . , . . . �. : � ", - -, . . � . � � .,� �- : t � ., �: . :��i �.,, ,, � , . , , . .. " � . . , . , � ': "�, . I , : & �, , : , , -, , , � � � . , `,��, , �e I ..�,,.�.-- , - . -, � , ' j:: I I � 1� �, . . . :`* , , , . � : , , .. I , , . . . - . � �� . : :� ...:: - ! . . . . . . . . . . I . . I I I , �,,: :1 , .,. �. . :.' , : , : � .:', j .. . �" , :� � :�� � , 1 � ;." ',;i; � :. :;:- : ,* : I , I ,. . - . . I . I . . * , I , - .. . ': .�.�::�::�:: : �:-: .:.: �:� .-�:. -:*�:: --'�;,� , . . . & .:. . . I . , . ., :�, � . :�� .. �::.� ::,: . . . , 1 . - � �� , . .. . � .. �,; - 43 '� i'� ��������.!�ii�i::���:���!���;..��.�.; ::� �;,�:� , .. - - , � � , ,, a , .. . ... .�: .: : : ., � - :.�:. . ': :�",'..: -!, * , ", . .. .1 -� .1 ;.��,"- .. ..%..: ::�; , I .. . � . I � � . .� " ., .�., ". , , , � . " . - . . , I . - -,,: I , I . I . . . ., '. , , ,�'. . . . . .. .1 .. . . .. , . i , . � �:;`, * , . . , ; ". , , . . , , , , � � .. I= � ,...L:. 4 :. ... I... .. , � � -, B , . , , . * .����...��:�.;:::��:��.�:�;..--.��:�-,,*-.,,,.�:� . I -.�,- I . . �..- � , " �:,,�,'-,��l� '- . ... , �-:�,--,;001�� z �:., .:�.::,::, �:�.�,::�-'..:,�:::,:.: t=& - �*���.�.,,.'��:,,,,��:��''i-:�.,'�,�.,, ""!,�",��'j'-�,��i ., - -, . ... . , . !:: *� -.�� , , .- � -..'i , .. -�,.-�-.',.' , -:,. .�;...�� . ���:'.,,�:��..,,.,-',�,--i-.'�.,�:."-�,,��, ... �-�:::�::'.,.-:l:.,.:-, .'. - . ;,��)", -.:,��::�,.�.�i� �i.. - , _ -�� , ,:* ` .',-;,�,� *g'. -,-".,-K-��;:.-- , .. , .. ,.,., I ,��.. . ..., � .-, D--TQ,4: �.'��,�--, - - I . , ; . . , " . ,� " *, " I .11 . I � - - - '.. . ". , , . - . . � , . . , ,., . . " - � j � ... I . I , . . I I �'.,'&��' , � 44 - - - : . . %--j /.., �1� f'.'/ • .� w . � �:,:� ,:�,�� , - - , , a * .:., . - " " - I , . . . . . � , . I I (O, -,�..:. , - .11 .., . ., 9 C-i . , . il:�� A � I . , , , .-.�-Y. - , " - .., -.. - ..:.:".; .� ,. .-.., - .. " . I... . .-.,.-;,;,: -. - :..:: . . .1 - , i: : , - , . ., ol. o - . -., '. - • , .." - , , - . .: .,.-.. , ''. . - , ..�. -,-- ... '. � . , �ii. I - .. � f, I I I d. :.. - ; ; b 1 . . . . - , .. . - .1 . � , ., - '," .. I �. . � - - .., . I . , , , � -,.. ''. :;. . : � ''. . , . , . ^ , 45 . , '... . '.. . I . , -- "* I I 606 1= ....� .. I ..... - , .: � - - I lil , - I . I . I I - - - - . 1 140 - - - -- w. - - ,-, %-j If A .L I -f %_9 VV t-i L- I L'- rX 1'r I U) 1= 1 ZD ZD L- 17- N --,-,-,,*, -- - " )---v----r , Ej ,---- " - I I tz� b . a 3 , , - 47 . .. v. ...- 1 48 . C) C) I L,:-..-j I 0 cz� L . . :� � -- - ,-�- (-)5/ 1 1 / 9 C) I--- pvto ~ - - - - ------ 1 7 038, 7(--) . 49 L I L I, . L ,. 1: L " � ' , �L , " . . . I , . . . . . I L . I I .. - . . � � . I . I . .� I ' ' L . 1 I . . q . . 1: . � . . . : I � I . I I L L I . . L I . . . -...L - " . . I I I . . . 11 : . I 11 I � L L I .. -1 .1 1, � . L� �;� , . ,., L . 1. . - I - .:! �Li- ', . - , � I , , . .17 L' - ,_ , . .1 . I L .. '. 7 .1 . I I , :: L ,�.��.�;�� , L , , .1, , . , � .. 1;: - 1, , I ' I I .:! - �i :� , . . � :- - . I . � . I .�': . . 1 . .:i. . I . I - ------- - - -I-.- 1.11, -- ---- ----.---- I . 11 ' ' ,.�;,'.L ��, 'i " . F : � : , . I . . � L I L ' . I . . . I . , . - - , '�,�' :1 �L I . . . L , : I L "... , L I., L . '-",-"'-'-,L-,., ,.--,..".,..-,. 11 - -0 50 1 ! , ... . , . I . I . . . . . � r - : . Q . O L 5. I Q .. .: :.-.::.'.]�.'.'. �,: � , , . -.,:,.,. , .�-- . :�' . :. �::...:.:: �. '.. ,:.. .. : I : . "' :-: ': .:� L .,:": ' .. . . . L . .1 " ,. , - . ' � 'L '� L �.L . I . _ � t- . I . I :1 . - .- )5/ 1 1 /90 L . . . . :. .. I .. . , , . I I I L : . I . I L - .. . I . . 1* .1 . 1.�':� -... ��L' I .:, � . - - :.''. ..., I : .: I I I ". � . I L '' L . . � : - - �: ''.; .. , 1, , I ; - : , I . I L . I , . .; " , , I . . . . .. , , . ; �: '-!,:.:,�.-�": L � 'L , �. ". � '� "' I '. ., ... " . , . . - I _ L ' " . �� , , . , � :, : , . I � �, '- ' ' � - L . , I � . : '*, ,:', :,-,-,� ,,� ': I . ': '� " - ,','j 1. ..L.' , - - . ..'L' "�..'�� N �- ""Lj" �:! "", 1! .L 11 ...l. .., '.- - - - �1-1 " - :I ';� - � " L � L "': ...': � L.. ". .1 I . . � . .. I . . , , . . I . , - - " I � , , , . - . , . L. . �." I , , , , , , , " I . I - � I � 7L', ;V,.�;'. �: ,, . . '� ��- - L : . I., 17";,; - - L I I , ,,, - I , "; - " ... - . I .. . �� � � .. �,.-',-"� :-.. ". - , �:;i , i,,.--,". , I , �.:!�.-.,-;! "-, - ,. .��' 11 I-,.. :., 1_ I , .. , , .,% .; , . , . I L "'' O'Ho ,-* �,.�L, LOFG REN. : �z: v - �. L ...: �;. L I - L. L. L *: - .'' - " - , ", " �, � .; L I -, : I- - L� ... - -, .-:.,,, " -:�, �,-, .,.. I . . � . I I . � I � . I . . L . I L 1. � I . I . L . L . . 401, 9 � I I . . � I I I.. o I., ,l I I I . I L I I I I olaft b I . I . .l.. I . � I 11 . 51 : .1 . :.. .j : , . ::.�: :� -!., ;,. , , �. . :,''., I �. . � :!* I .. . � �.' - ' , �. . ,:: �- - rl . I ., . ..... L . . . . I ; LL., . L L : I - - . ; , L . I I . I I : � � I I L . I - ... I . . ... ,. . ,% . I , 1 : ..'', ''' L I L ::;: i . , � , .� L" .::' , , . , 1, � ., I L: 1, ' . j : L'. I : I L ��, " L: .11 . . � : ,; .11-11.1 , I ., ��.. � ��` ,,.,...,; , " ..,. ., ''.- .. I I I ' L' I .. L ... I .":. ::. .'':. I . � . , a. . � "; . -Z . . ,:.:'' 11 .. � :,.. ... .:':' ' ' : , , �� �L � �,�:�,., I : � . - . . . - . t I . ..� - ..:: . ., "; , ,: � :C, �, - �, - - : ":, �.�, -�. ��; � .1 , -:,. ;; '. �, , : , � .. : i; : , , :.�,: -� � - - - ;!.'. ��: ;r :'�� � � . "'., t , . '�.�':' � - L . I .. �l L I . . � ., . ... . . . . . � . . . . 1. I I . .11. . .L . . I . . , I . - -----.--.--.--- . . I. L - �� -#- ) .-; / I . . . L _L ,�, � .,. . .1 ,. . ! - I . . . , : : L . I � ,".. � , " . : . � I I . ; :,. �.; I I . . .1 L I I : . . � . . I I . 1. . I " . : � . . - " !;. � :' L - . I . I L � I I I I I N ' 39, 53 _1 54 c) 0 1 5I '%-.) 9 05/ I 1 /9i --) � lv-- -- - ---- . I . . L I I :� " 7777 .. 7 7, . I L ., , , , . �j� - - � I I I .... I.. ... . . L . I . � . I -: 7 L , � ., �.�, - .. I I ".":,� L ", ' - I . . I . �.. . .1 I. . - . � I L . . I I . ,� I . . � Lq - - . , . I � - � 1 551 ' I.L* ' �' I 11 . . . L .. � I . L , : .� j, � . . �., : I 'L �!L�,� �:: .: � � , , L i . . - . I . - I I :.. j. :jL - , I . I . . I I I L . , . . � I - �: . � - . I . . i - . .1 I L I . . . L . j : , ,' ', , , , L 1, .. I . L � .. . . � � �,. . .. � �. , , I I . I I . I : : , L I . .. I 1 . . :. . '. : I. -� I - I . I L " L � I . � L I . j . � ' : . I . L . . . � .. . . . . 1 . , I L - . j I . ., . . I .. C) 0 1 5 1 10 - IL . I L I . . . . . . . - . . . I j I j .: : , , L 1, . I .1 L . I . . L I . L.:.. . .., I . . Aw .j � I L.. - 0541 �:, 57 1 , 1 1 4 , 7 0 - - -------.- L L I I I .2 5c-6 , 8, EN CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0005 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD e o 0 241 0015121 O5/11/90 MYLEB R BURKE 001i5l 22 (""5/11/90 SHERRAL MILLER 1-2 7 - f KARI DREGER 126~00 30 C 1 1 05/11/90 JENNIFER FORD A o 115 05/ 11/90 DENNIS P LINDORFF 1 181. 90 -RA MEYERS RRY .1 148a Er 77 7 38 15 128- c "ARY RAHN* I 08a 50 o 0 241 0015121 O5/11/90 MYLEB R BURKE 001i5l 22 (""5/11/90 SHERRAL MILLER 1-2 7 - f KARI DREGER 126~00 30 C 1 1 05/11/90 JENNIFER FORD A o -RA MEYERS 77 7 38 15 128- c "ARY RAHN* I 08a 50 HORSNELL.. 392a 15 0015136 �0015137 ~ 05/11/�0 RITA MACY 05/11 / ALL.I SON McGINNIS 1 249 10 121.50 59.50 I �Q CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0006 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD , YF AMOUNT c o |^| oo�o���� o�/z�/�U KATHLEEN M DOHER�Y --' — 995.63 569.94 237, 70 1 594. t=16 241 0015148 05/11/9O ROBERT J WENGER -I EL CAMPANARO 26 :DAN 281 NADEAU 1,341~10 ' 460.00 30 05 /1 /1 9- 0 GEORGE W lylULWEE S'. NUTESON 057 1 719 la 135 DAVID D EDSON 1 I I f 0 ' 371 1` 225~ 10 )0 15157 21 /11/90 GEORBE C SPREIGL 1,195.50 4"' WEI LAND VOID D 01CMA) 2 88b' 98, 00 VOID 21, 111 8 r It 0 ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0007 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINBS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS � | [� FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD /�� n./ .."I" , . I , -, '. . "- ':�-;'I:�' - " ' ", A , .� �'� , , . . -,:,. "'!,".' -� . ,." :0, . .-�.� _.-';'�'�'. '� v " . .:. % � I . . ' ' '�' ��� . = t '.. . I , ... � .. . .. - . , . , . - IL � i'', . '.. 'j - - .Q. .I 1. 7 _.:;:1.; � ��"��:'. :.':�::::�:��;��r - 7 -!,i-.:;�:,!-:,,,,.,.:,,,:.:...::,.:.::,,.::;::r.;,,,'.�...,. D"" . ..... .. I . .. .r.. . - =* . -.":'' ::''../ � .-"-,. :.:�.'-: ��` ` �� --: ,�. - � " ".'! ,9'.% '-!, I I I I I . F��.e � 9 � it � . , - "_,'..',.'. , F'*�U.Fs,L , E. m_ - �� RET . , . ,.'r',�;,�,�'"'.".""r,�!.-,.". - I ' . . .' � � - , .. r ,- � , � F I . I . , . '. . : - ' r 9 . . ' - �."; lt� ,r' :�. %�!_ , . : , � r I . . r I I . . � I . � r: . " , :* ... . , . � . I . :. ': . � :: � . : . . : , '��:' 9 9 _ . �� , , .... I , , .�� , . :� �"' '� ". '. �� ��� 26 ': .i:::J t " ' �..r...... _ . 51:7'1b�__ I : ;_:., . . - I : �' -::'.�:. , , .:.: ; ; ")5/ 1-:1 /90: : C . . . � ,, � _::"'�.� - R A- M -�':- Co t.-_ $Qp.po . ��:'.��.'. . ". _!� -_'-"','-:��- ." '-� ` &.r:' y , '9 . RT COLLECT ! 27 ;:�; :.:::�'��i:�:::�;:' . ' :...: I . '-� :.:.". m- .:.. i ....: . � . . , , , ' i . .' � 9 . . . I I � 0 40 r I r . . . . r . . � . . . . .: r I . 1. . . � I , _ - . . . ; , .1 ::�'�� . L f . I ': , ...' . I � . � r 9 x I . �. . r � ': - I : . � . . . I ..' � .. . � �� I . : .: .: ,.. .'-. :. , . , : � . I . . .. 4 . r . . ..r . . 9 . - . I r . 1-.: � � ' PUBL C,,: , P,�* RETI I 0 . . , . ' : : . I r � I . I I r 'a, I 11 4D -�� . -- i .- --.,,,- .",--�-- - - - - - 9 . . . . I . 9 . . ' , , , ' ,".'_�' tu . . '! - : , . .' � , L , '� I . , : .' , , . . . .. r . . 52 9 A Number E __ C , 2 AGENDA REPORT Action b Counoi TO: Cit Mana Endorsed. FROM: Finance Director Modified---- RE: REPLACEMENT OF CLERK-TYPIST IN FINANCE DEPT* Date—, DATE: Ma 10 1990 The Cit Council re that all job openin for permanent positions be submitted for their review prior to hirin an new emplo The part-time clerk-t in the Finance Department has resi to accept a full-time position with Ramse Count It is re that the Council approve the replacement of this person. Agenda Number -- A G E N D A R E P O R T TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: INVESTMENT POLICIES DATE: 5 -15 -90 INTRODUCTION A.c.tion by Council, Endorsed... Mo d i f i e d.,�,..,,,,,,,,,�„,„ Rejecte Date it is proposed that Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. be designated as an authorized security dealer for City of Maplewood investment transactions. BACKGROUND On November 14, 1988 the attached investment policies were adopted. Among other things, these policies provide that all investment transactions be conducted with Minnesota financial institutions and primary security dealers (i.e. those that report to the Federal Reserve Bank). It was the intent that additional security dealers could be authorized as needed. DISCUSSION Comparative quotes from Miller & Schroeder on investments recently purchased have been very competitive. Therefore, the City would financially benefit if Miller & Schroeder is designated as an authorized security dealer as some future investments could - be p urchased from them at a higher rate of return. The company is affiliated with USF & G Corporation, a $12 billion insurance company. Miller & Schroeder has acted as the City's financial consultant on bond issues for over four years and has provided very good service. Also, the firm is ranked in the top 20 of tax - exempt municipal bond underwriters in the nation. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. be designated as an authorized security dealer for City investment transactions. DFF: dff METRO \METDATA \AGENMS v r • Agenda No.� /D AGENDA REPORT Action by Coun Endors t �: ---- jY1 0 C 1 ? .. �-.� -.•-. TO: City Manager Red ec -�._._. - FROM: Finance Director t 4'i Date REO INVESTMENT POLICIES DATE. November 3, 1988 INTRODUCTION It is roposed that the attached investment policies be adopted to provide P clear guidelines for the investment function. BACKGROUND The Finance Department is responsi for the investment function. This function is performed in accordance with Council approved policies and State law. Council -approved investment authorizations and policies are as follows. 1. Regarding certificate of deposits, the City Council has: a } approved roved 11 financial institutions from which certificates of deposit may be purchased, b) limited the amount on deposit to the amount of F.D.I.C. or F.S.L.I.C. insurance covering the deposits unless collateral or a bond is furnished as additional collateral, and c authorized the Finance Director, Assistant Finance Director and Accountant to make wire transfers for certificates of deposit. 2. The City Council has authorized participation in the 4M Fund which is a financial service offered by the League of Minnesota Cities. 3. Regarding mutual funds, the City council has authorized investment in: a) the Vanguard Fixed income becurities runa u.n.m.H, ruvLi u 1u, b } the Franklin U.S. Government Securities Fund, and c) the Franklin Federal Money Fund. 4, The Cit y Council has authorized an investment services agreement with Shearson Lehman Hutton for management of part of the City's investment portfolio. (Currently they manage 7% of the total.) City Manager . INVESTMENT POLICIES November 3, 1988 Page Two The p receding formal policies have been supplemented by an informal policy that. allows the Finance Director to invest in any security authorized by State law in'amounts and maturities as deemed appropriate by the Finance Director. See Exhibit A for a copy of the State law listing authorized investments. DISCUSSION The Cit y p of Maplewood has an average investment balance of approximately 15 million dollars. Current investment policies have been effective but sho uld be formalized and expanded for the following reasons. 19 The principal advantage is that straightforward, understandable guidelines established for the investment function, assure that the City's investments are within the requirements of the State statutes. This can protect the City from financial losses due to a lack of understanding of the statute. 2. By having a formal, written policy, clear objectives are set forth for the investment function. By having the objectives known, the individual performing this function can perform more efficiently. 3. A formal policy provides a framework for financial decision making for the individual erformin the investment task. For example, the policy P g addresses such topics as the selection of financial intermediaries and special requirements for certain investments. 4. The investment policy can be used as a basis for evaluating individual performance as well as investments themselves. The attached policies (Exhibit B), cover objectives, guidelines and other information necessary to perform the investment function. All of the proposed policies have generally been followed in the past with the exception of the management fee policy. This new policy will provide new revenues to the General Fund of approximately $80,000 per year as reimbursement for investment management services performed by the Finance Department. The money will come from all other City funds on a pro -rata basis that will be based on the amount of investment interest they are allocated. Initially, the management fee wily be calculated as 0.6% of the investment portfolio which is the fee presently charged the City by Shearson Lehman Hutton which manages part of the portfolio. RECOMMENDATION The attached resolution is recommended for adoption. DFF:kaz RESOLUTION a WHEREAS, investment City of Maplewood is dedicated to the proposition that a ro sound � p rogram ram is an essential element of good fiscal management; and WHEREAS it is important to have a written policy to aid in the investment process; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of P Y Maplewood that the attached olic entitled "Investment Policy for the C ity of P Maplewood" be ado ted as the official investment policy for the City of Maplewood effective January 1, 19890 INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD. I, SCOPE This investment P olicy applies to all financial assets held by the City of Maplewood. II. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES A. The following objectives w i l l be applied in the investment of the city's funds: 10 The P rimary objective is the preservation of capital and the protection of investment principal. City 2. The will strive to maximize the return on the investment portfolio and to preserve the purchasing power but will avoid assuming unreasonable investment risk. 3. T The investment portfolio should allow the City to meet cash flow requirements for operations. 4. The City will employ mechanisms to control risks and diversify its investments in regard to the type, as well as the individual financial institution. III. LEGAL ASPECTS The City of Maplewood will invest only in securities which are permissible under Minnesota Statue Section 475.66 (see Exhibit A). IV, CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIARIES A. General Guidelines The City f Maplewood will conduct its investment transactions with (1) financial institutions located in the e State of Minnesota that are designated as depositories by the City Council and (2) g security dealers who are on the Federal Reserve Bank's l i s t of primary dealers. B. Repurchase Agreements (Repo's} Selection of Repo Vendors The Finance Director shall only purchase repurchase agreements from vendors that meet the following criteria (as defined in MSA.475.66): a. The vendor must be a primary reporting dealer in United States government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; or b. Any national or state bank.in the U.S. that is a member of the Federal Reserve System and whose combined capital and surplus equals or exceeds $10,000,000. V. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS _FOR CERTAIN INVESTMENTS A. Certificates of Deposits 1. At the time of purchase, no more than 10 percent of the investment portfolio shall be invested in certificates of deposit at any one financial institutions 2. Certificates of deposit shall not exceed the amount of F.D.I.C. or F.S.L.I.0 insurance covering such deposit unless collateral or a bond is furnished as additional security. Except for notes secured by first mortgages of future maturity, the total amount of collateral computed at its market value shall be at least ten percent more than the amount or deposit in excess of the insured portion. 3. The total amount of collateral consisting of notes secured by first mortgages of future maturity, computed at its market value shall be at least forty percent more than the amount on deposit in excess of the insured portion. 4. The collateral so deposited shall be assigned to the City of Maplewood from the depository. B. Bankers Acceptances 1. Bankers Acceptances shall be restricted to those of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. 2. Bankers acceptances shall only be purchased when the yield is higher than that of United States Treasury Obligations or Federal Agency Issues. C. Commercial Pape^ 1. Commercial paper shall be restricted to issues that have a rating of A -1 by Moody's and P -1 by Standard and Poors and mature in 270 days or less. 2. Commercial paper shall be purchased only from dealers who report to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or from qualifying banks. 3. Commercial paper shall only be purchased when the yield is higher than that of U.S. Treasury obligations or Federal Agency issues. D. Mutual Funds 11 The City of Maplewood may invest in mutual funds from selected dealers meeting the criteria set forth in Section IV or directly from the mutual fund. 2. Due to the volatile nature of some mutual funds and their lack of a maturity date, the market must be closely . monitored to P rotect from losses. The following procedures will be taken with regard to mutual funds that are not classified as money market funds a. The Finance Director will monitor the daily yield and market value of the fund to ensure against potential losses. A call shall be placed to the dealer or to the fund to obtain the current yield and market value at a minimum of twice per week. b. If the market value shows a downward trend, the shares in the fund will be sold. VI. MANAGEMENT FEE The General Fund shall be allocated a management fee, of which the will be based on the rate paid by the City to an outside percentage investment firm for the same investment services p erformed. This fee will be allocated among the funds. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS The City f Ma lewood's investment program should have four basic ingredients: y p ld. Cash management 1 egal i ty, safety, liquidity, qui di ty, and yield. is • also an essential ingredient to a good investment program. The Finance g s for effective Department has the responsibility to establish procedure ' p b cash management. These procedures will b e maintained y the Finance Director and reviewed, at a minimum, on an annual basis to determine applicability. MSA 475.66 EXHIBIT A 475.66 DEBT SERVICE FUND. Subdivision 1. All debt service funds shall be deposited and secured as provided in chapter 118, except for amounts invested as authorized in this section, and may be deposited in interest - bearing accounts, and such deposits may be evidenced by certificates of deposit with fixed maturities. Sufficient cash for payment of principal, interest, and redemption premiums when due with respect to the obligations for which any debt . P service fund is created shall be provided by crediting to the fund the collections of tax, special assessment, or other revenues appropriated for that purpose, and depositing all such receipts in a depository bank or banks duly qualified according to law or investing and reinvesting such receipts in securities authorized in this section. Time deposits shall be withdrawable and certificates of deposit and investments shall mature and shall bear interest payable at times and in amounts which, in the judgment of the governing body or its treasurer or other officer or committee to which it has delegated investment decisions, will provide cash at the times and in the amounts required for the purposes of the debt service fund, provided however, that the governing body may authorize the purchase of longer terns investments subject to an agreement to repurchase such investments at times and prices sufficient to yield the amounts estimated to be so required. Repurchase agreements may be entered into with (1) a bank qualified as depository of money held in the debt service fund; (2) any national or state bank in the United States which is a member of the federal reserve system and whose combined capital and surplus equals or exceeds $10,000,000; (3) a primary reporting dealer in United States government securities to the federal reserve bank of New York; or (4) a securities broker - dealer having its principal executive office in Minnesota, licensed pursuant to chapter 80A, or. an affiliate of it, regulated by the securities and exchange commission and maintaining a combined capital and surplus of $40,000,000 or more, exclusive of subordinated debt. Subd. 2. Investments may be held in safekeeping with (1) any federal reserve bank; (2) any bank authorized under the laws of the United States or any state to exercise corporate trust powers, including but not limited to the bank from which the invest - ment is purchased; (3) a primary reporting dealer in United States government securities to the federal reserve bank of New York; or (4) a securities broker - dealer described in subdivision 1; provided that the municipality's ownership of all securities in which the fund is invested is evidenced by written acknowledgments identifying the securities by the names of the issuers, maturity dates, interest rates, and serial numbers or other distinguishing marks. Subd. 3. Subject to the provisions of any resolutions or other instruments securing obligations payable from a debt service fund, any balance in the fund may be invested (a) in governmental bonds, notes, bills, mortgages, and other securities, which are direct obligations or are guaranteed or insured issues of the United States, its agencies, its instrumentalities, or organizations created by an act of Congress, MSA 475.66 Page Two EXHIBIT A (b) in shares of an investment company (1) registered under the Federal Invest - ment Company Act of 1940, whose shares are registered under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, and (2) whose only investments are in securities described in the preceding clause and repurchase agreements fully collateralized by those securities, if the repur- chase agreements are entered into only with those primary reporting dealers that report to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and with the 100 largest United States commercial banks, (c) in any security which is (l) a general obligation of the state of Minnesota or any of its municipalities or (2) a general obligation of the Minnesota housing finance agency, provided that investments under this clause (2) may be made only (i) prior to August 1, 1990, and (ii) for a period of no more than three years, (d) in bankers acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System, or (e) in commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries that is of the highest quality and matures in 270 days or less. The fund may also be used to purchase any obligation, whether general or special, of an issue which is payable from the fund, at such price, which may include a premium, as shall be agreed to by the holder, or may be used to redeem any obligation of such an issue prior to maturity in accordance with its terms. The securities representing any such investment may be sold or hypothecated by the municipality at any time,'but the money so received remains a part of the fund until used for the purpose for which the fund was created. Subd. 4. Any obligation held in the debt service fund from which it is payable may be canceled at any time unless otherwise provided in a resolution or other instrument securing obligations payable from the fund. AGENDA NUMBER -- AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: 1990 BUDGET - WAGES /BENEFITS DATE: May 18, 1990 Action by Counci]. :j Endorsed.. Modified - Rej Bated_ Dat Contracts for 1990 have been negotiated and settlements reached with all .bargaining units except the Sergeants. The original 1990 Budget was based upon 1989 payrates. Additional money was included in the contingency accounts within each fund to cover the 1990 contract settlements. The contingency account transfers needed to finance all wage and benefit increases (including personnel changes) approved to date is $281,470. It is recommended that the City Council approve the necessary budget changes to finance these costs. DFF : df f METRO\METDATA\AGENWAGE AGENDA NUMBER AGENDA REPORT Action by Counoilib TO: City Manager Endorsed_ FROM: Finance Director Modified- RE: 1990 BUDGET CHANGES - FINANCE DEPT. Rejecte Date DATE: May 18, 1990 INTRODUCTION Budget changes totaling $14,020 are needed to finance audit costs and medicare billing clerical costs. BACKGROUND For the third consecutive year, inadequate city staff ing caused the audit bill to be higher than the budgeted amount. The amount budgeted for the annual audit has been relatively constant each year. The City's contract with Peat Marwick initially was $17,500 annually for fiscal years 1986 -1990. This amount has been revised slightly each year due to the termination of the federal revenue sharing program in 1987 and the addition in 1989 of special audit procedures required due to the receipt of federal Community Development Block Grant monies. The audit contract amount was $17,600 for the 1989 fiscal year and $7,920 of this was budgeted for in the Finance Department budget. The actual audit costs for 1989 were $35,380 and approximately $21,580 of this will be charged to the Finance Department budget. The additional costs were for the preparation of workpapers and financial schedules that City staff were required to do according to the audit contract. City staff time available for audit - related work was limited due to more time required for budgeting and employee turnover. The preparation of the 1990 budget took more time than normal because of State law changes. After the budget preparation process had started, the Governor vetoed the tax bill and the Truth In Taxation requirements took more staff time. In January when City staff was preparing for the audit, the Accountant in the Finance Department left to accept a better job. The new Accountant hired did not start until March 19th after most of the audit had been completed. The Finance Department budget needs to be increased by $13,660 to cover the unanticipated additional audit costs. A budget change is also needed due to new federal medicare billing requirements. For ambulance services provided on or after September 1st, the City will be required to complete all medicare claim forms. In addition, federal law prohibits the City from charging for the completion of these forms. In the past, these medicare forms had been completed by the people billed. An average of 41 people are billed each month that are covered by medicare. It is estimated that the clerical time required for completing and submitting the medicare forms will be approximately 15 minutes per bill. This amounts to an average of three hours per week. A budget transfer of $360 is needed to finance the additional three hours per week of clerical time that will be required for the final three months of this year. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a $14,020 budget transfer from the General Fund contingency account to finance the audit costs and medicare billing clerical costs. DFF : df f METRO\METDATA\AGENFIN E -� MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT /OWNER: PROJECT: DATE INTRODUCTION City Manager Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Renewal 1225 Frost Avenue George Hirsch George's Auto May 10, 1990 Aotion by Co oti:,. E ndorsed..... . ... �,,, Modified ReJeoted Date The applicant is requesting the renewal of the conditional use permit (CUP) for a metal building in a BC, Business Commercial district. BACKGROUND The City Council granted the CUP on May 9, 1988 (see page .4) and a one -year renewal on May 18, 19890 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 36- 442(e) of the City Code requires that Council review all CUPs within one year of approval. Council may require additional renewals up to every five years. DISCUSSION All conditions are being met. RECOMMENDATION Renewal of the conditional use. permit for George's Auto for five years, subject to the original condition of approval. nj m /Hirsch . mem Attachments: 1 Locution Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. May 9, 1988 CUP Conditions ONO O v m � o V 0 m E _ h��i I Ritittrt , ; "y7� I f� I{ 11111111: Wwa�ml.. fn �° III '_ '► REVISED 4 -08 -8b LOCATION MAP GLADSTONE LAND USE PLAN 2 M r Frost Ave. ATTACHMENT 1 4 N r 32 ' 4-0--mm R o .� 15 � 2 Q � — `. ,! /b 5 lip" 33 = , 1 4 `�� V A — --RY-AN h - F-- Q 9 a 34 or on Ar — file\ 19 415 33 '35 15 1 ray, 51 0 .... ---- (4 4 9 , 13 1 (t4-) o i2 h s ) • r .. 7 ' 1w � / . �B 48 � 9 �� b 3 Cs� s '' 47 ti 42 4 44 _38 39 40 - �, • r� %0: 1 �Z 14 Ott �''� • It o 1 s 1 1 - tt "� .► , 10 ' 1� �" 10 1G 10���= W 17 10 a 1 � ,F , 8 poi •� � Ia e �,,, is '- .~ � � � • O �� `• 7 1 � • ~ , �: t9 ' T � �j 11 T ••� 13 1 �� , G 20 ' amft� do 4D 044 1 SO wi 15 ZA ��. L ..._.. YY Q 1 °!0? G• 432 �`�• Ito LZA 1 3 n , J" I k c s� oa_ i � • -5 9 to . e ► � d P ■ Zse, xo °, © s 9a o6r, ri c r wq ln m m PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 ATTACHMENT 2 4 N vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 6. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access or parking needs that will cause undue burden to the area proper- ties. 7. The use would be serviced by essential public services, such as ' streets, police, fire protection, utilities, schools and parks. 8. The use would not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services; and would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City. 9. The use would preserve and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 10. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental ettects. 11. The building would be substantially screened, as defined in Section 36 -27, as viewed from streets or residentially zoned land. 12. The building would not be of lesser quality than.surrounding development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Adherence to the site plan, dated April 12, 1988, unless a change is approved by the City. 2. The property owner shall not be allowed exterior storage of junked vehicles, parts, debris or refuse. 3. Compliance with the screening ordinance, Section 36 -27. Seconded by Councilmember Juker. Ayes - all. 4 ATTACHMENT 3 AGENDA ITEM ti s by Council v MEMORANDUM ndors e TO City Manager Modified ,..,,�.,...�.. Rej ected �. ..�. FROM: City Engineer Date SUBJECT: Budget Transfer -- Central Ramsey Watershed Management Organization DATE: May 21, 1990 Introduction The Central Ramsey Watershed Management Organization is one of four WMOs'the city is required to fund. The other three' organizations raise funds through special assessments and tax levies. The Central Ramsey WMO, however, is funded through direct payments from the member cities. Background The Central Ramsey WMO was created in 1985 by a joint powers agreement between the cities of Falcon Heights, Maplewood, Roseville and St. Paul. The agreement provides for each city council to ratify the proposed budget each year. Attached is a proposed administrative budget for the remainder of 1990. The total is $19,488. The agreement also provides for a split of the budget on a percentage of area basis. 1990 Request Falcon Heights 1.8% $ 351 Maplewood 498% 935 Roseville 14.7% 2 St. Paul 78.7% 15, Total 100% $19,488 Recommendation It is recommended the city council endorse the 1990 budget and authorize a budget transfer of $940 from the general fund contingency account to the public works administration budget to fund Maplewood's share of administrative costs. KGH jw Attachment AGENDA ITEM MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Budget Transfer - -Desk Chairs DATE: May 21, 1990 Action by Council :. indorsed Modified, Rej ected�„,,,,„ Date In the last several months, three desk chairs in the engineering division have broken beyond repair and a fourth is ready to go anytime. Funds were not budgeted for replacement chairs this year, and it is not reasonable to wait until next year to purchase replacements. It is recommended that $1000 be transferred from the general fund contingency account to the engineering division budget for the purchase of four desk chairs. KGH jW Agenda Number Action by C oun0il , *1 Endorsed- ' AGENDA REPORT modified.,..............,�. Rej ected..�... Dat0. T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: C i t Manager a e r City g RE: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR SALARIES DATE: May 21, 1990 INTRODUCTION The Director and Deputy Director of Emergency Management were not given salary increases as of'the first of the year. Their current salaries are $600.00 and $375.00 per month respectively. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the salary for the Director of Emergency Management be increased to $625.00 per month and that the Deputy Director's salary be increased to $390.00 per month, effective January 1, 1990. MAM : kas AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager Michael McGuire . , _.., From: Chef of Police Kenneth V. Collins ;e� .. Subject: Request to Replace Public Safety Dispatcher Date: May 22, 1990 Ao tion by Counall... Endorse Modified Re j e Dad Introduction Public y p ' Safety Di Karen Nelson has submitted her resignation effective June 1 1990, to accept a newly created position as an Emergency.Medical Dispatcher with the St. Paul Fire Department. I would pP request approval to begin a search for a suitable candidate to fill q this position. Recommendation Review and approval of this request. Action Requ i r d Submit to the City Council for their review and approval. KVC:js s AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: TO. city man dorsed. ,,........�,.. ' Y Modified FROM* Assistant City Engineer ReJecte j Date SUBJECT: Upper Afton Road, Project 86 -07- -Award of Bids DATE. May 21, 1990 Introduction Bids for . the subject project were received on May 18 , 1990* A tabulation of bids is attached. A resolution to award the bid to Forest Lake Contracting for $1,122,,581.06 is attached. Background The estimated construction cost given in the feasibility report was $919,650. The bid was slightly lower than the detailed engineer's estimate based.on the final as -bid plans of $1,.166,,536 The .increase of .project cost from feasibility report to bid prices primarily stems from two factors. The supporting value of the soil subgrade was tested and found to be less than anticipated. Therefore, the pavement was required to have a greater thickness. The additional costs for pavement are state aid eligible, and thus, do not require financing from other sources to be increased. A second factor increasing the project costs was provision of retaining walls on a segment.of the south side of the roadway to protect a group of significant oak trees. These retaining walls are also state aid eligible.. All right -of. -way and easements required to construct this project have been - secured. The state aid variance committee will meet May 31, 1990 It is expected that state aid will be granted and construction could begin during the second week. of June. The project would be complete by November 1990 with the exception of final bituminous wearing course and select tree plantings which will be done in June 1991 under the most favorable weather. Recommendation It is recommended that the bid be awarded to Forest Lake Contracting to receipt of approval by state aid. BAI jc Attachments TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., Friday, May 18, 1990. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and p icl ubl y read aloud bids for construction of Upper Afton Road, SAP 138-114- City Proj ect 86 - 07. Present were: Walter Geissler, Bruce Irish, and Randy Lindblom of the engineering division and Larry Bohrer of TKDA. Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following bids were opened and read: BIDDER BID AMOUNT BID BOND Forest Lake Cont. $1,122 5% F. M,. Frattalone Exc. 1 5% Danner, Inc. 1 5% Hardrives 1 5� Carl Bolander & Sons 1 5% Alexander Const, 1 5% Brown & Cris, Inc. 1 5% Shafer Contracting 1,272,534.05 5� Progressive Cont. 1 5% Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of May 31, 19900 Meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m. RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Forest Lake Contracting in the amount of. $1,122.,581.06 is the lowest responsible bid for the construction of Upper, Afton Road, AP 138 - 114 -01, City. Project 86 -07, and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a. contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the city after notification of state aid approval FURTHERMORE, the project budget is amended to $1,"415-,,000, and the project financing . is amended as follows State aid funding $1,318,500, Special assessments 96 Total $1,415,000 J AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Council: Endorsed._ TO: City Manager Modified..,,„ Rejected FROM: Assistant City Engineer ate SUBJECT: Birmingham /Frost Storm Sewer, Project 90- 08- -Award of Bid DATE: May 21, 1990 Proposals for this project will be received on May 30, 199 0 . A tabulation and recommendaiton of award will be presented at the ,council meeting. BAI jc TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: INTRODUCTION of i on by C oai 1 Endo Modifled MEMORANDUM eotetd., r..�.� City Man Date � y g Tom Ekstrand, Associate Planner Final Plat Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road (Section 24 -29) Ed Cave.and Sons, Inc. Caves Woods and Ponds Second Addition May 17, 1990 Ed Cave and Sons. Inc. are requesting approval of a final plat for the Woods and Ponds Second Addition. This is the balance of the subdivision originally proposed as Woods and Ponds. BACKGROUND August 28, 1989 Council approved the preliminary plat for the original Woods and Ponds Addition. January 22, 1990: Council gave final plat approval to "Woods and Ponds ". This is a partial platting of the original subdivision. Mr. Cave platted the four -lot, Woods and Ponds Additio for four h ouses that were moved from Roseville. May 14, 1990: Council tabled the final plat and directed staff to make sure that all the preliminary plat conditions have been complied with. DISCUSSION All of the conditions for final plat approval have been met. RECOMMENDATION Approve the final plat for Caves Woods and Ponds 2nd Addition. TEWOODS Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Final Plat reduction 3. Preliminary Plat conditions NORTH SA /NT PAUL 29 68 A HO • p _ _ L LO AY AV OLL RIPL AV it CLE A z AV W � W � QD z LARP NTEUR AV � o J 0 0 } IDAHO AV Y d H T pNA A '� 1) ( I) CURR I E ST b£B RASKA AV (2) MYRTLE CT (2) `� 3 41 —1 a� 2 _&Yl y oRl N BEMLANA CT ... T _ OAK H/L L I i ANGELA � MICKEY 5,1 jZ Al IVY ELKHE_ART LA FQY,QrE N 68 o / ; Y ; - � 1 I14 � N �d � Y - 4 I 31 I- ri0 �- a MALXLAND A HAVIrTHORNE AV. 31 E E RO y 68 N ST • � �- At z H GERA% CERA1y o ,. MAGNOL AV 4v �p 0 ° i Ea 5 .00 Lake � �� � Y %�� J ao `E P`• CASE AV t; 0 a AA Z ESTER Cwt AV J + a a � 'All t o W AND ,,, �. a AV LOCATION MAP 2 Attachment 1 4 N FINAL PLAT 3 Attachment 2 N CAVE WOODS AND PONDS 2ND ADDITION t /, r.r_ r. i ; C ire n% ir. s ' - NW Corner of Sec. 24, T. 29, R. 22 - O o North pnt of W* 114 of Sec. 24 E A S T � In \ Romsey County C.1 M. - • -- 899.10 -•- '� ;•• - -- 100.02 j 30.01 129.63 r,; r. ,, LARPENT E UR _ o I o 0 .�k �_�v . �l,r; ►_I V L. \/1 \ M V 1.I VllL_ r ; A% /f: Q.$ fir: AVENUE 30.00 30.00 99 4 I ' C F- W o� h I 33 0 h� -` �+ z W o o X L 'J �� -= t► N88 "'W _j E AS T -- 99.6 7 -- 30 00 30 00 rn I 1 . A �� .ti��`� q�tr �� /���r +�. - 100.OZ I s r_ � rlr ' I o 66 EAST .h y ID - 2 h ' 344.89 278.87 ' 88'46'2 8 "W -- 88•46 wl 109.2 `� In °p "' a's's Q a l _ to Z _ 3 �� • "' I ° I tut 2 co O : w /A a • m L_ , 1e� �, a` - N8e•46'2a"w- '.,• , ti NIlB'46'2B'W � o - 132.64 - -x 0 o N88"46'28'W '•�. N80' ZS'18 ei 120.00 M b obi F. 8 F . 53 7 S8 2J" I ~ 195.00 8 ' I IT3'SI'4S" H c' to oo 4 ° a o d G w l l} �, I I w v gA L "' a = 0 z _N66*4G'28'Wj o N68'46'28 - W ., • 397.80 - - f35.00� 5 ltJ ;I s z V o ICU _ W A o to I 3 L ) - °- N88'46'28 "W 1 397 85* "R ' _ ; N 88'46' M o - -- 135.00- C� N .. (32. 0 2 65.8s s ..., Q !- F 1 O O ° co to / (^ ►° ;'I J 3s N89'58'30 "W �; ^ N88.4G'28'W 9 N88'46'28 - W s 135 p /O 132.00 o I � r '1 F_ � is I ry H Q• 8 Z 'O w ^I IO I � O I 7 ° m 7 33 66.00 °( o �' N o to 30.00 3000 I 10 Z I J ►s � L --132.03 ( L.� 03 66.02 - 90 of 30 of - t35. - - - - -I - 150.03 I ~ - - 'lfS. 95 - -� 659.07 I �` N89 58'3O "W South line of NW 114 of NW 114 of NW 114 of Sec.24 FINAL PLAT 3 Attachment 2 N 1. Preliminary Plat Revision: Woods and Ponds a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 8 -28 -89 b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the proposal. C. Sam Cave, Ed Cave & Sons, Inc., spoke on behalf of his request. d. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve Cave's. Woods and Ponds Addition preliminary plat (plans stamped August_28, 1986) subiect to the following conditions being met before final plat approval: 1. Conditions a. The plat may be revised to allow a driveway from Lot 7 to Currie Street, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. b. An opinion shall be submitted by a certified soils expert which describes the soil correction procedure(s) necessary to prepare the areas proposed as building sites for Lots 1, 2 3 and 4 of Block One. These procedures shall be included in the developer's agreement. C. The final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. These plans shall include, but not be limited to: (1) A proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site, as well as the areas to be disturbed for street construction. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on sites that contain trees to be preserved. Deviation from this approved grading" plan may be permitted by the City Engineer, provided that the intent of the overall grading plan is complied with. (2) The location of the four -inch and larger diameter trees to be saved shall be shown on the grading Vs; plan. The location and type of trees to be replanted (Condition e.) shall be shown in the grading plan. (3) The pad for Lot 12 shall be revised to meet the rear yard setback of 53 feet. (4) In the grading plan, show the location of the driveway for Lot 13, Block One, including the area for the required turn - around. 4 Attachment 3 (5) The grading plan shall maximize preservation of the hill and trees on Lot One, Block Two, as much as possible. (6) The use of a temporary rock entrance pad, during construction. (7) Revise the house pads on Larpenteur Avenue to provide a 70 -foot setback from the pipeline with 5 -6 feet of berming. (8) The grading of Lots 8 and 9 shall be revised to save the trees adjacent to the pond. d. Submittal to the City a 100 - foot - diameter easement for the temporary cul -de -sac for the Currie Street right -of- way . e. Submittal of a signed developer's agreement to the City Engineer with the required surety for all public, street, ponding and utility improvements required for this development. This agreement shall also guarantee: (1) That trees will be planted to comply with Section 9 -191 (5) (b) of the environmental protection ordinance. (2) That the prescribed soil correction procedure(s) in Condition be (above) will be followed. (3) Construction of driveway turn - arounds for Lots 1, 2 3 4 12 and 13, Block One. (4) Construction of driveways for Lots 7 and 12, Block One, that comply with the requirements of Section 10.207 of the Uniform Fire Code. 2. Deny the rear yard setback variances, on the basis that they d - not - meet - - th-e findings required by State law for a variance. Homes can be constructed to meet the setbacks. 3. Approve a setback of 70 feet from the pipeline in Larpenteur Avenue, provided that 5 - 6 feet of berming is provided in the front yards. Seconded by councilmember Anderson. 0 Ayes - Mayor Greavu, Councilmembers Anderson, Bastian and Rossbach Nay - Councilmember Juker AGENDA ITEM �i _ 4z AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: City Hall Update DATE: May 21, 1990 Action by Ccunoll: Endors ems,,; Modified.., � Raj ecte to Information on this item will not be available until later in the week. KGH j C f/— 3 May 22, 1990 Action, by Ce ol •. 1. E ndorse MEMORANDUM .. Modifi ed„„.. . • ReJ eat To . C i ty Manager Michael McGu Date From: Chief of Police Kenneth � ' � • Collins � ns Sub 3 ct: Falk Kennel License Renewal On May 14, 1990, the City Council • renewal at tabled action on the Falk kennel license the request of area residents. This matter is scheduled uled to be reheard -at the Council ' �1 meeting on May 31, 1990. KVC: cc 88- 013127 AGENDA NUMBER AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: 1990 BUDGET - REDUCED STATE AID DATE: May 22, 1990 INTRODUCTION Action by Counoil:4 Endorsed.,„ Modifte Rejected-- Dat The 1990 Budget needs to be revised as the State 1990 tax bill reduces State aid to Maplewood by $113,2000 BACKGROUND The last tax bill forces cities to bear the brunt of cuts needed to balance the State's budget over the next two years. In 1990, local government aid to Maplewood will be reduced by $113,200 which amounts to 10.4% of the LGA amount included in the General Fund budget. This is exacerbated by the fact that cities cannot increase their payable 1991 tax levy to make up for the cutback. In addition to this, 1991 LGA payments will be frozen at the 1990 reduced level. Attached is an excerpt from the LMC Cities Bulletin dated April 27th which contains additional information. Currently there is $34,900 left in the General Fund contingency account which should be used to finance part of the LGA cutback. This leaves a remaining amount of $78,300 to be financed. It should be noted that using the remaining contingency balance to finance part of the LGA cutback eliminates the City's financial flexibility. It means that any additional expenditure requests during the remainder of this year, that are not included in the current budget, will have to be rejected. ALTERNATIVES There are basically two methods of financing the remaining $78,300 shortage caused by the LGA cutback for 1990: 1. Reduce 1990 expenditures to finance the LGA cutback. 2. Use the City's "Rainy Day Fund" (General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance) to finance the LGA cutback. DISCUSSION General Fund budgeted expenditures currently otal y $9,325,590. Through April 30th, actual expenditures totaled $2,5.34,780 leaving a remaining balance of $61790,810. Across the board budget cutbacks • of 1.2% of the remaining budgeted balance would be required to save $78,300. In order to accomplish this, personnel reductions would be required as 6 � 2� of the General Fund budget currently is for personnel costs. Reduction of 1990 point would be very difficult to accomplish xpenditures at this mplish and would be disruptive to City services. The budgeted General Fund fund balance t asses - • this year is $2,407,205.. ( liabilities) for the end of Preferably this amount should equal 29% of the estimated revenues ($2,683,080) to provide a suf ' ficient balance to cover cash flow needs. Reduction of the fund balance b 7 y $ 8 ,300 would be a relatively small percentage of the total. The reduction could be viewed as a tem orar measure and could be reversed in 1991 if the a p y are followed (i.e. 1991 - bud budgeted appropriate budgeting procedures g revenues would exceed expenditures to increase the fund balance). RECOMMENDATION The second alternative is recommended as this ' compensated is the least disruptive to City services and can be com p d for during preparation of the 1991 Budget, ACTION RE UIRED The City Council should approve 1990 Budget changes nges consisting of a $113.,200 decrease in General Fund estimated revenues and a $34,900 decrease in the General Fund contingency account -, DFF : df f METRO\METDATA\AGENLGA 1 t League of Minnesota Cities C le S tille III Number 12 April 27, 1990 Tax bill cuts city aid $46 million High valued businesses get $I8 million in relief The 1990 tax bill (H.F. 2478) will force local governments, particularly cities, to bear the brunt of cuts needed to balance the ` state's budget over the next two years. The state will withhold an esti- mated $46 million in state aid from cities in Pay 1990 and Pay 1991 com- bined. While the state makes sizable cuts in local government aids, high- valued businesses will receive about $18 mil - lion in additional relief which will come from increases in the homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) program. In contrast, cities will have to absorb an immediate $15.6 million cut in Pay 1990 aid (equal to 1.53 percent of their spend- ing) with only eight months left in their budget cycle. Hundreds of city officials responded to the League's action alerts and contacted their legislators with information about the impact of the aid cuts on city serv- ices. Cities, grass roots lobbying helped insure that the much deeper city aid and levy base cuts of $76 million that the Senate and the governor proposed ear- lier did not prevail. After three days of around - the - clock, marathon negotiation sessions of the tax conference committee, the tax bill got Senate approval at 1:30 a.m. Wednes- day, April 25 by a vote of 37 to 27. The House passed the bill three hours lature hopes to replenish later in the earlier with a vote of 93 to 38. biennium. For the next three years (fi scal 1991- 1993 ), the tax bill reduces state spending by approximately $300 million, over half of the $550 million in cuts lawmak- ers identified as necessary to balance the budget for the next biennium. Legisla- tive actions this year will still require use of approximately $20million of the $550 million budget reserve which the Legis- Pay 1990 aid cuts Cities will loose $15.6 million in local government aid (LGA) and homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) in Pay 1990 under the tax bill. The aid cut is permanent and therefore will save the state another $15.6 million in Pay 1991. See tax bill, page 13 Truth in taxation for all cities Beginning this year, all cities, regard- less of size, will have to comply with the truth in taxation requirements. Ac- cording to the timeline, the Depart- ment of Revenue must certify LGA amounts and levy limits (for cities over 2,500 population) by August 1. By September 1, all cities must adopt a proposed budget and certify a pro- posed property tax levy to the county auditor (the final levy may not exceed this proposed amount). Beginning in calendar year 1991, taxes payable 1992, parcel specific proposed property tax notices are required for Hennepin, Ramsey, and St. Louis Coun- ties. One year later (1992, taxes pay- able 1993), the remaining 84 counties must send parcel specific notices. These notices will provide the property owner with the impact of proposed changes on their actual property, rather that the gross totals of a local government's budget and property tax levy. By November 10, counties are respon- sible for preparing and mailing ge- neric property tax notices to each prop- erty owner. This notice will include the proposed budget and levy informa- tion, and time and location of the public budget hearings for each local unit. In order to provide information neces- sary for the parcel specific notices, the Department of Revenue must notify county auditors of the cakmlated amounts of HACA and disparity reduction aid by September 1. This requirement will See truth to taxation, page 13 i Truth in taxation af 0 % 0 fects all cities, continued apply to Hennepin, Ramsey, and St. Louis counties for taxes levied in 1991, and for all other counties for taxes levied in 1992. The League has argued that this information is vital in the accuracy of the truth in taxation process for the cal- culations of actual tax impacts on spe- cific property parcels. Local governments have to bold their budget hearings between November 15 and December 20. Five working days after December 20, local governments must certify their final levies to the county auditor (December 28 in calendar year 1990). If there is an increase in a city's levy limit when 1989 population and house- hold estimates become available (see levy limit discussion), an increase in their allowable certified levy can be added to the amount of the proposed levy for the public bearing. (This provi- sion acknowledges that these updated numbers are unlikely to be available when calculating levy limits used for the proposed budget and levy notice sent to property owners.) The Legislature repealed the $1,840,000 it had appropriated in the 1989 Special Session to reimburse counties for the Tax bill, continued The law does not allow cities to in- crease their levies next year to make up for this aid loss. b)be Pay 1990 aid cut will be equal to 1.53 percent of the city's Pay 1990 revenue base. A city's revenue base is equal to the city's total Pay 1990 levy (including special levies) plus the city's originally certified Pay 1990 LGA amount and .Pay 1990 taconite aid am int (if any). The print -out, pages Pl -P10 es- tirriates the Pay 1990 revenue bases and aid cuts for each city. The Pay 1990 aid cut will first come from the city's LGA, then, if necessary, from equalization aid, HACA, and dis- parity reduction aid, in that order. The costs of complying with the truth in taxation requirements for Pay 1991. It is likely that the costs incurred in the prepa- ration and mailing of the proposed budget and levy notices will be apportioned among the affected local jurisdictions. Scheduling of budget hearings County auditors, rather than the Depart- ment of Revenue, will now be respon- sible for coordinating of the require- ments of truth in taxation. Local gov- ernments have to schedule two bearings - -an initial hearing and a date on which a continued hearing could convene, if necessary. By August 1, county auditors will notify school districts of the dates they have chosen for their bearings. By August 15, school districts are required to select their hearing dates. If school districts have not chosen their dates by this time, the county auditor will assign bearing dates for the school. By August 20, county auditors will no- tify city clerks of the dates which the county and school districts have selected. At the time a city certifies its proposed levy to the county auditor (September 1) it must also select the initial and continuation hearing dates. There can conference committee dropped a Senate provision that would have required a cut in a city's municipal state highway aid if the city did not receive sufficient LGA or HACA to absorb the 1.53 percent cut. Although the bill does not specifically address how the Pay 1990 aid cuts will be made, presumably the cut will be divided equally between cities, two aid payments due on July 20, 1990 and December 15, 1990. The bill cuts county aids permanently by $ 12.4 million in Pay 1990. A provision that excludes counties, special levies for human services from the revenue base to be no overlap of budgettlevy bearings. Modified newspaper advertisement requirement The conference committee accepted a provision intended to better inform vot- ers who pay property taxes indirectly- - renters. It includes a requirement for a newspaper advertisement of the local government's proposed budget and levy in addition to the generic proposed budget and property tax notice. The advertisement must appear in an official newspaper of general circula- tion in the taxing authority... of general interest and readership ... published at least once per week ... land) must not be placed in the part of the newspaper where legal notices and classified ads appear. The advertisement must be at least one - eighth page in size, and the headline must be in type of at least 24 point, with a text of at least 18 point type. The notice must be published not less than two days nor more than six days before the bearing. The form of the advertisement is pre- scribed in the law. SH which the 1.53 percent reduction applies lessens the impact on counties. Counties can increase their Pay 1991 levies to make up for 50 percent of the aid reduc- tion. Counties also face a one -year de- lay (until 1994) in the state takeover of half of county income maintenance costs, an action that is estimated to save the state $ 18.9 million in fiscal 1992. Levy limit base reductions Cities subject to levy Limits cannot in- crease their levies in Pay 1991 to make up for the 1.53 percent aid cuts. The tax bill reduces (by the dollar amount of the aid cut) the Pay 1991 levy limit bases of April 27, 1990 FrOged on recycled paper Page 13 I cities subject. to levy limits (i.e., cities with populations over 2,500 and cities which receive taconite aid). Cities which have no aid to lose, however, would still be subject to a levy base reduction equal to 1.53 percent of its avenue base. To calculate. the Pay 1991 levy base, start with the unreduced (before aid cuts) Pay. 1990 levy base, then increase that base by three percent plus one -half the increase in population or households, whichever is greater. This adjusted levy limit base will then decrease by the dollar amount of the 1.53 percent cut. This reduced levy limit base for Pay 1991 is likely to be the base the state uses to calculate cities' Pay 1992 levy limits. There will be a delay in population esti- mates for Minnesota cities and counties outside the metropolitan area due to the 1990 federal census. The deadline for cities to receive their final population and household estimates is September 1, 1990. Because updated estimates may not be available in time to provide the current population and household esti- mates necessary for Pay 1991 aid and levy calculations (which occur in July and August), calculations of LGA and levy limits will use the most recently available estimate of population or house- holds as of July 15, 1990. Pay 1991 LGA and levy limits, there - fore, may be calculated using 1988 (rather than 1989) population/household statis- tics. The household adjustment factor used in determining HACA amounts will compare the most recently available estimate as of September 7 19909 di- Aid cuts under tax bill (In millions of dollars) Pay 1990 Pay 1991 Pay 90 Aid Cuts $.12.4 - $12.4 Counties Cities $15.6 $15.6 Special Taxing Districts $ 2.0 $2.0 LGA Freeze (Pay 1990) -- $15.0 GI Eq ualization Refund Repeal $10.0 $10.0 HACA Growth Reduction -- $10.0 TIF (Minneapolis provision) $1.8 $2.8 Special Taxing District Reserves Renters Credit Restructure -- $3.0 Delayed Income Maintenance Takeover i. -• $18.9 Increased Spending Items: Targeting Refund for Homesteads � g -- +$6.0 Cut in high -value C/I taxes +$18.0 vided by the number of households from the previous year. Recalculation of 1991 levy limits will be possible up to Octo- ber 15, 19901, if available, and if the current estimate would increase a city's levy authority. Cities which experience a population or household decline will not have decreased levy authority. (See truth in taxation for effect on proposed levy process.) The law overrules city charters which impose levy limits. A sped fic override was included to exempt promrty tax levy increases which result frOM a re- duction in state aid. The penalty for cities and towns which exceed their Pay 1992 levy limitation will be deducted from their P2Y 1902 state aid payments, rather thava from their Pay 1993 aids. In addition, the overlevy penalty may now come out of taconite aids, in addition to LGA and HACA. The repeal of all city levy limits (over all, per capita, and statutory) will z:at take effect until Pay 1993 (fomlerl: Pay 1992) to coincide with the scheduled repeal of county levy limits. LGA freeze in Pay 9 fln top of the permanent aid cut of $15.6 million, LGA will be frozen in Pay 1991 at the reduced Pay 1990 level. Under this provision, cities will forego an addi- tional $15 million in LGA inflation in- creases that were scheduled under previ- ous law. The House bill would have allowed a small inflation increase of $4.9 million while the Senate bill called for a freeze at Pay 1990 LGA levels and an additional deep LGA cut of .$16.3 million. Unlike the original Senate bill, cities' levy limit bases will not be further re- duced by the foregone LGA inflation increases. Equalization aid separate from LG A The equalization aid distributions which were calculated for 1990 and then folded Page 14 panted on ncytted paper LMC Cities Bulletin r- Action by Counoil a Endorsed MEMORANDUM odi fe R eJeoted�.,. TO : City Manager Date FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT Truth -in -Sale of Housing Ordinance DATE: May 18, 1990 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The City Council asked the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to consider the adoption of a truth -in -sale of housing ordinance. This type of ordinance requires that a property owner have a report prepared on the condition of their house before they can sell it. This report must be done by a certified housing inspector. Some cities require that the property owner correct all city code violations before the owner can sell the property. Some cities do not require this. The main benefit of this type of ordinance is to protect home buyers. If a copy of this report is filed with the City, a City inspector must require the correction of any Code violations. The City may or may not require this as a condition of the sale of the house. Some type of follow -up enforcement would improve the quality and value of housing that is sold. BACKGROUND September 5, 1989: The Maplewood HRA held a truth -in -sale of housing forum with realtors and other interested persons to discuss the proposed ordinance. October 10, 1989: The Maplewood HRA held a meeting to discuss the ordinance with the Board of Realtors. The HRA recommended the adoption of a truth -in- housing ordinance. October 23, 1989: The City Council held their first meeting to discuss the ordinance. The Council tabled the ordinance for further review. November 13, 1989: The City Council again discussed the ordinance. The Council referred it back to the HRA to review the disclosure forms and to include a lead paint warning. March 13, 1990: The HRA reviewed the ordinance and draft single - family inspection form. The HRA directed staff to revise the inspection form with their comments as well as with those received from the Board of Realtors. April 10 and May 8, 1990: The HRA again reviewed the ordinance and housing forms and made suggestions for changes and requests for additional information. DISCUSSION There are two main questions for the City to answer. Should the City use the housing report to enforce its housing maintenance ordinances or not? What types of housing should this ordinance apply to? Enforcement Using the housing report to determine code violations would improve the quality and value of housing sold. The disadvantage P is that it would take additional time from the environmental. health officer and the clerical workers. There would be additional phone calls, inspections to make and housing reports to file. Since this is a new program, it is difficult to say how much additional time would be needed. It is important to note that the City's housing maintenance code is minimal for single dwellings. . It only applies to the exterior condition of the house. Most sellers try to improve the exterior condition of their home before selling to increase the value. As a result, their may not be much code enforcement work needed. The City may want to try code enforcement on a trial basis to determine how much work it would involve. If the City decides not to do any enforcement, housing reports should not be filed with the City. The City Attorney advises us that it is the duty of administrative officials to enforce code violations that they are made aware of. (Refer to the letter on page 68.) Filing a housing report that indicates a potential code violation is notification. If inspectors do not file reports with the City, we cannot determine the degree of compliance with. the ordinance. The city of St. Paul keeps the Truth -in- Housing Disclosure Reports with their division of public health. Code compliance work in St. Paul is handled by their building inspections department. Thus if a potential code violation is reveealed by a Truth -in- Housing inspection, it usually is not known by the building inspections department. An assistant St. Paul City Attorney stated that technically the Truth -in - Housing report is a notification to the City. He noted that their inspection form has.enough disclaimers to protect the City from possible liability when a code compliance matter is raised. Type of Houslnq If the City decides to use the housing reports for follow -up enforcement work, the ordinance should include apartment buildings. If not, truth -in -sale of housing should only apply to single and double dwellings, townhouses and condominiums. The people who buy these types of buildings are generally not as knowledgeable about housing as investors buying apartments. An enforcement program, however, would benefit apartment renters. 0 The attached ordinance requires that housing inspectors file their reports with the City. The City would then do a follow -up inspection of any potential housing maintenance code violations. The ordinance covers all types of residential buildings, including apartments. The attached Inspection Forms (pages 39, 46 and 53) .include all of the applicable items covered by the St. Paul inspection form (page 35) and items of particular concern to Maplewood. RECOMMENDATION 110 Adopt the attached truth -in -sale of housing ordinance and reevaluate it after it has been in effect for one year. 2. Adopt the attached resolution on page 11 approving a $15 filing fee for each report. K REFERENCE Resource Persons 1. Minneapolis, St. Paul, South St. Paul, New Hope and St. Louis Park have adopted some type of truth-in-sale housing ordinance. Each of these communities has had their program in effect for at least ten years. These cities are convinced that their codes have improved routine maintenance of property. They also believe that they have resulted in the correction of many small deficiencies that could have led to larger problems. Perspective home buyers have been receptive to the requirement of disclosing code deficiencies as well. 2. The Board of Realtors supports the disclosure of housing defects, but are opposed to any follow -up code enforcement. They are particularly opposed to any enforcement that would delay the sale of a property. 3. Representative Alice Johnson of Spring Lake Park introduced a bill in the 1988 session of the legislature about housing disclosure. The proposed law would require every seller of residential property to complete a disclosure questionnaire form. It would warranty that the seller is not aware of any other problems than those noted on the form. The bill, however, did not get much support and is now dead. Representative Johnson said that she may introduce the bill a -gain in the future but she is not sure when that might be. The housing inspector for New Hope believes that this law would complement their code compliance inspection program. This is because some code deficiencies are not detectable by an inspector. T.aN,►l� i t An inspection cannot guarantee that.a major problem will not occur. The inspector can only respond, to the items that he or she can see. If a major problem arises, the buyer may try to sue to recover damages. This may happen even though the disclosure report clearly states that the inspector makes no guarantees. The suit could be against the seller, realtor, the City or all of the abov Unhappy buyers have sued New Hope and St. Louis Park because an undetected problem arose after the buyer took possession. These suits were not successful for the buyers, because the inspectors tried to identify deficiencies in these dwellings. Compliance with the Ordinance Realtors will be the best people for making sure that housing reports are done. Sales that do not involve a realtor may not 4 have housing reports done. Realtors handle about 60 to 70 percent of the sales in the St. Paul area. These are usually higher valued homes. Minneapolis reports 100% compliance in i better neighborhoods and 70 o to 75o compliance in poorer neighborhoods. An inspection is in the realtor's interest, because it may reduce their liability if a problem arises after the sale of a ro erty. Advertisement of the housing inspection p p requirement in the City's newsletter, sewer bill inserts and sale -by -owner magazines should improve compliance with the ordinance. Inspections St. Paul, Minneapolis and South St. Paul use city- licensed, independent inspectors for disclosure inspections. The average cost to the homeowner ranges from $80 to $110. Most inspectors can do an inspection within 24 hours if needed. St. Paul has 42 licensed inspectors. Minneapolis has 65. St. Paul receives 4,500 to 6,000 truth -in -sale of housing reports each year. New Hope and St. Louis Park use city employees to run their programs. These communities subsidize the cost of their inspection programs. They each charge $35 per property inspected. In St. Louis Park, an inspector is busy full -time with housing inspections. In New Hope, a certified building inspector charges about one -half of her time to their program. New Hope has about 250 to 300 inspections each year. The cost to New Hope is about $10,000 to $12,000 annually for this service. Structures Inspected in other Cities The code in New Hope applies to all residential units. The St. Paul code applies to single dwellings, townhouses, condominiums and mixed uses with two or fewer residential units. St. Louis Park and Minneapolis cover only single and double dwellings. South St. Paul's code only applies to single dwellings. Emphasis of Code Code Compliance: The New Hope and St. Louis Park codes require the correction of all code deficiencies before the sale of a residential property. The only time they do not require compliance before the sale is when the buyer agrees to make the corrections by a specific date after the sale. This gives the buyer time to make the required repairs. Richfield has recently adopted a similar ordinance. The age of Maplewood Is housing is similar to that of New Hope and St. Louis Park. These cities use this program primarily to upgrade and maintain their housing stock. 5 • Disclosure Versus Compliance: South St. Paul, St. Paul and Minneapolis have chosen not to 'require the correction of code violations: Code compliance is often not cost - effective in older cities, due to the age and number of dwellings. These cities adopted their codes to inform home buyers of any major deficiencies before they make a financial commitment. The purchasers may then take care of the problems on their own. TRUTH.MEM mb Attachments 1. Truth -in- Sale -of- Housing ordinance 2. Resolution for Fees 3. Owner- occupied Housing Maintenance Code 4. Rental Housing Maintenance Code 5. St. Paul's truth -in -sale of housing disclosure form 6. Maplewood's single - family disclosure form 7. Maplewood's owner - occupied attached housing disclosure form 8. Maplewood's rental housing disclosure form 9. HRA Minutes, October 10, 1989 10. HRA Minutes, March 13, 1990 11. HRA Minutes, April 10, 1990 12. HRA Minutes, May 8, 1990 13. City Attorney's Letter 0 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING TRUTH -IN -SALE OF HOUSING THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Article XII, Truth -in -Sale of Housing Ordinance, is hereby added to Chapter 9 of the Code of ordinances. Article XII. Truth -in- Sale -of- Housing Ordinance. Sec. 9 -235. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to promote decent, safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations. To help accomplish this, the City is requiring the disclosure of housing information and defects as a condition of the sale of housing. City inspectors may use this information to require the correction of code violations. Sec. 9 Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following terms are defined as follows: Adequate water flow: Enough pressure to maintain at least a one- quarter inch (1/4 diameter (pencil- sized) flow of water from each of at least three ( 3 ) or more plumbing fixtures at the same time. Contractual agreement: An agreement, written or otherwise, between a buyer and seller for the conveyance of, or the intent to convey, all or part of a housing unit or residential building. A contractual agreement shall include, but not be limited to, an earnest money contract, deed or purchase agreement. Housing unit: A single dwelling, a double - dwelling unit, a townhouse unit, a condominium unit (as defined by Minnesota Statutes), or any other attached housing unit designed for the occupancy of one family. A housing unit shall not include a manufactured home. Owner: A person having a vested interest in the housing unit or residential building in question. This includes his or her duly - authorized agent or attorney, before a sale. Residential building: A building containing one or more housing units. Sale: The conveyance of a housing unit or residential building to a new owner. V� Sec. 9 -237. Applicability. This article shall not apply to any newly constructed housing or residential building when the title is conveyed to the first owner, except that no owner shall convey or contract to convey a newly- constructed housing unit or residential building - ithout first providing to the buyer: 1. A list of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all contractors and subcontractors who constructed the building. 2. The items in Section 9 -238 (b) (2) (a, b, c, e, f, g, h and i ) . Sec. 9 -238. Truth -in -Sale of Housing Disclosure Report. (a) An owner shall not show a housing .unit or residential building to a prospective buyer without publicly displaying and making available a truth -in -sale of housing disclosure report. This report shall be at the housing unit or residential building at the time of showing and within three (3) days of listing. A copy of the disclosure report shall be issued to the buyer before the execution of a contractual agreement. A copy of such report must be filed within 15 days with the City to be valid. A double filing fee shall be collected by the City if the report is not filed within 15 days. (b) A housing disclosure report shall be prepared by the City. It shall include: (1) An evaluation by a City- certified housing inspector of specific parts of the building and property listed on the housing disclosure report. This list shall include, but not be limited to, items addressed in the housing maintenance, siding and junk removal ordinances. The City shall be responsible for determining whether there is an ordinance violation. (2) A signed statement by the owner that includes the following information: a. Any damage to the building or its contents by flooding or sewer backup and any evidence of chronic water seepage of which the owner has knowledge. b. The nature, extent and cause of any water seepage or flooding of any portion of the property. C. Whether or not there are pending housing orders from the City about the property. d. Whether there is a homestead classification for real estate taxes payable. e. Any other known defects or problems that are not visible'.. f. Any deed restrictions or covenants running with the property. g. Whether the property is subject to the City's pipeline, shoreland or flood plain ordinances. h. The location and status of all known wells, including a map, stating whether the well is in use or abandoned and sealed. i. Whether the property is next to a high - voltage transmission line. If so, the disclosure form shall include the following statement: "The subject property is located near a high- voltage electric transmission line. Purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on exposure to a magnetic field generated by high- voltage lines. At this time no risk assessments have been made." (c) A truth-in-sale of housing disclosure report shall be . valid for no more than one year from the date of approval by the City. However, if there is substandard maintenance or subsequent damage to the building, the Director of Community Development may require a new inspection. Sec. 9 -239. Limitations. (a) In making a housing inspection, the inspector shall consider any concealed facilities to be adequate. The inspector shall base his or her evaluation on the functional operation of the facility and the condition of the equipment that is viewed. No other warrant is expressed or implied. (b) No one shall consider anything in a truth -in -sale of housing disclosure report to imply that a residential building or housing unit meets all minimum building standards. In addition, no one shall consider anything in the report to imply a warrant of the condition of E the housing evaluated. The inspector warrants that he or she has used reasonable care and diligence in inspecting and evaluating the building. Sec. 9 -240. Certificate of Competency. ( a) No person shall fill out a truth -in -sale . of housing disclosure report without having a valid certificate of competency. The City must issue the certificate of competency. The City will only approve housing inspectors that have passed competency tests as truth - in- housing evaluators in St. Paul. The housing inspectors must submit certification papers to Maplewood from the City of St. Paul as truth -in- housing evaluators. The City of Maplewood must license each housing inspector that works in the City. Maplewood will automatically revoke a housing inspector's license if it is revoked in St. Paul., The City of Maplewood may require the passing of a test that shows the inspector's knowledge of the City's hous ing code. The City may then issue a certificate of competency which is valid for one year. The City may issue renewals of all such certificates. If a certificate of competency lapses for one year or more, the person who held such certificate shall reapply to Maplewood for renewal of such certificate. No holder of a certificate of competency shall allow another person to use said certificate. (b) The City Council may revoke the certificate of competency of a housing inspector for cause. At least ten days before the hearing, the City shall send written notification to the mailing address used in the inspector's application. The notice shall list the date, time and place of the hearing and of the specific reasons for the suspension. The Community Development Director may, at his or her discretion, suspend the certificate of competency of a housing inspector pending a suspension hearing. Sec. 9 -241. Insurance. (a) No certificate of competency shall be issued or renewed without satisfactory proof of insurance insuring the appl i cant/ evaluator. (b) The City shall be included as a named insured on the required insurance and any additional cost for including the City shall be at the expense of the applicant /evaluator. 10 (c) The applicant's /evaluator's insurance shall remain in force continuously thereafter and no certificate of competency shall be deemed to be in effect during any period of time when such insurance and proof thereof are not also in effect. z (d) Each applicant /evaluator shall have an individually - named insurance policy. (e) The insurance policy shall provide coverage of not less than $250,000 per claim or $500,000 per year, aggregate, against any and all liability imposed by law resulting from the performance of the duties as a certified Truth -in -Sale of Housing evaluator. Sec. 9 -242. Housing Evaluation Fees. The City Council shall set up a fee schedule by resolution for the filing of truth -in -sale of housing disclosure reports. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 1991. , 10.a RESOLUTION: FILING FEE WHEREAS, the City Council has approved.a Truth-in- Sale -of- Housing Ordinance; and WHEREAS, such ordinance requires the filing of certain forms which require administrative time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a fee of $15 for each truth -in sale housing disclosure report be required at the time of filing. Adopted this day of , 1990. 11 • ARTICLE VII. OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE Sec. 9 -130. Short title. This article shall be cited as the owner occupied housing mainte- nance code. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.010,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -131. Purpose: • The purpose of this article is to establish minimum standards for the maintenance of exterior areas of owner occupied housing, as well as interior areas of attached owner occupied dwellings. The general objectives shall include the following: (1) To protect the character and stability of residential proper- ties within the city, (2) To correct and prevent housing conditions that adversely affect or are likely to adversely affect the life, safety, general welfare and health, including the physical, mental and social well -being of persons occupying dwellings within the city; 528 12 Attachment 3 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -134 (3) To provide minimum standards for the maintenance of ex- isting residential buildings and to prevent deterioration and blight. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.020,1-22-81), L L Sec. 9 -132. Applicability and scope. This article shall apply to exterior areas of owner occupied dwell- ell - ings and interior areas of attached owner occupied dwellings. The construction, repair or alteration of residential ro ert shall com- p P y ply with the provisions of this article and the building and zoning codes. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.030 1-22-81) Sec. 9 -133. Rules of construction. For the purposes of this article, the following ules of construc- ti g on shall apply: (1) Words used in the present tense include the future; words in the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter; the singular number includes the plural and the plural the singular. (2) Where terms are not defined in this section and are defined in the building bode or zoning code, they shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the building code or zoning code. (3) Where terms are not defined in this article or in the building or zoning code, their common dictionary definitions shall apply. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.040,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -134. Definitions. For the purposes of this article, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: Approved, as applied to a material, device or method of construc- tion, shall mean approved by the enforcement officer under the provisions of this article, or approved by other authority designated n gated by law to give approval in the matter in question. Attached dwellings shall mean two (2) or more dwellin g units physically attached in construction such as condominiums, town- houses, double dwellings and quads. 529 13 9 -134 MAPLEWOOD CODE Building code shall mean the building code of the city, including the fire code. Dwellin g unit is a single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provi- sions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. Enforcement officer shall mean the city manager or his author - ized representative. ' Exterior property areas shall mean open space on the premises under the control of owners of such premises. Extermination shall mean the control and elimination of rodents, or other pests by eliminating their harborage places; by removing or makin g inaccessible materials that may serve as their feed, by poi - son spraying,. fumigating, trapping or by another recognized and legal pest elimination method. Owner shall mean owner or owners of the freehold of the premises or lessor estate therein. Premises shall mean a lot, plot or parcel of land including the building or structures thereon. Workmanlike shall mean the standards of the trade or industry involved. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.040,1- 22 -81) Cross reference —Rules of construction and definitions generally, § 1 -41 et seq. Sec. 9 -135. Exterior property areas. a Sanitation., All exterior property areas shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from any accumulation of refuse or garbage. . (b) Free from noxious weeds and pests. All exterior property areas shall be kept free from species of weeds or plant growth, rodents, vermin or other pests which are noxious or detrimental to the public health. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.050,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -136. Exterior of structures. . (a) The exterior of all structures and accessory structures includ- in g detached garages, shall be maintained in a workmanlike state of maintenance and repair. 530 14 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS $ 9 - 139 (b) Every exterior wall shall be free of holes, breaks, loose or rotting boards or timbers, falling or loose stucco or brick, or sub - stantial amounts of peeling paint. 10 . All doors and windows shall be maintained in good repair, fib, reasonably well within their frames, and be free of open breaks or holes. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.060,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -137 Interior areas of attached owner occupied dwellings. (a) The interior of every dwelling shall be maintained in clean and sanitary condition, free of accumulations of garbage and refuse. (b) The interior of every dwelling shall be maintained free from infestation of noxious insects, rodents and other pests. (c) All plumbing systems shall be properly installed, connected and maintained in good working order, and must be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects. (d) The storage of hazardous flammable liquids shall be prohib- ited. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.070 22 -81) �—� Sec. 9 -138. Vacated dwellings. The owner of any dwelling which has been declared unfit for human habitation or which is otherwise vacant for a period of sixty (60) days or more, shall make same safe and secure so that it is not hazardous to the health, safety and welfare of the public and does not constitute a public nuisance. Any such dwelling open at doors and windows, if unguarded, shall be deemed to be a hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public and a public nuisance within the meaning of this article. Upon failure of the owner to comply, the city may have such dwelling made safe and secure and assess the cost to the owner. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.080,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9 -139. Hazardous building declaration. If a dwelling has been declared unfit for human habitation and the owner has not remedied the defects within a prescribed reason- able time, the dwelling may be declared a hazardous building and treated consistent with the provisions of state law. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.090 22 -81) 531 15 t § 9 -140 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 9 -140. Enforcement officer. It shall be the duty of the enforcement officer to enforce the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 496, § 215.100 22 -81) Sec. 9 -141. Inspection of dwellings generally. The enforcement officer shall be authorized to make or cause to be made inspections to determine the condition of dwellings and premises in order to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the public. The enforcing officer, or his designated representatives, shall, with the permission of the owner, be authorized to inspect the exterior areas of any premises and the interior areas of attached dwellings at any reasonable time for the purpose of performing his duties under this article. If the owner, operator or person in posses- sion of the dwelling shall refuse to consent to the inspection and there is probable cause to believe that a violation exists on that particular premises, a search warrant may be obtained. (Ord. No. 496 § 215.110,1- 22 -81) Sec. 9-142. Compliance order. Whenever the enforcement officer determines that any dwelling or the premises, fails to meet the provisions of this article, he may issue a compliance order setting forth the violations of the article and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violations. This compliance order shall: (1) Be in writing; (2) Describe the location and nature of the violations of this article; (3) Establish a time for the correction of such violation and notify of appeal recourse; (4) Be served upon the owner. Such notice shall be deemed to be properly served upon such owner if a copy thereof is: a. Served upon him personally; or b. Sent by registered or certified mail; or c. Upon failure to effect notice through a. and b. as set out in this section, posted at a conspicuous place in or about the dwelling which is affected by the notice. (Ord. No. 496 § 215.120, 1- 22 -81) 532 4 16 t BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9.93 Secs. 9- 77 -9 -90. Reserved. ARTICLE VI. RENTAL HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE z L Sec. 9 -91. Short title. This article shall be cited as the rental housing maintenance code. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.010,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -92. Purpose; objectives. The purpose of this article is to assume a minimum level of standards and levels of maintenance for rental housing in the city. The general objectives shall include the following; (1) To protect the character and stability of residential proper- ties within the city. (2) To correct and. prevent housing conditions that adversely affect or are likely to adversely affect the life, safety, general • welfare and health, including the physical, mental and social well -being of persons occupying dwellings within the city. • (3) To provide minimum standards for cooking, heating and sanitary equipment necessary to the health and safety of occupants of the buildings. (4) To provide minimum standards for light and ventilation, necessary for health and safety. (5) To provide minimum standards for the maintenance of ex- isting residential buildings, and to thus prevent deteriora- tion and blight. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.020, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -93. Applicability and scope. • This article shall apply in the city to rental housing only. The • construction, repair or alteration of residential property shall com- ply with the provisions of the rental housing maintenance code. Any alterations thereof or changes of use therein, which may be caused directly or indirectly by the enforcement of this Code, shall be done in accordance with applicable sections of the building code and zoning code.. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.030,6-5-80) 511 17 Attachment 4 9 -94 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 9 -94. Rules of construction. For the purposes of this article, the following rules of construc- tion shall apply: (1) Words used in the present tense include the future; words in L the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter; the singular number includes the plural and the plural the singular. (2) Where terms are not defined in this article and are defined in the building code or zoning code, they shall have the mean- ings ascribed to them in the building code or zoning code. (3) Where terms are not defined in this article or in the building or zoning code, their common dictionary definitions shall control. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.040(l)—(3), 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -95. Definitions. For the. purposes of this article, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following respective meanings ascribed to them by this section: I Approved, as applied to a material, device or method of construc- tion, shall mean approved by the enforcement officer under the provisions of this article, or approved by other authority designated by law to give approval in the matter in question. Basement is that portion of a building between floor and ceiling, which is-partly below and partly above grade, but so located that the vertical distance from grade to floor below is less than the vertical distance from grade to ceiling. Building code shall mean the building code of the city, including the fire code. Cellar is that P ortion of the building between floor and ceiling which is wholly or partly below grade and so located that the verti- cal distance from grade to floor below is equal to or greater than the vertical distance from grade to ceiling. Dwelling unit is a single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provi- sions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. 512 In ' � e BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -95 Enforcement officer shall mean the city manager or his author- ized representative. Exterior property areas shall mean open space on the premises under the control of owners or operators of such premises. = Extermination shall mean the control and elimination of insects, rodents or other pests by eliminating their harborage pleces, by removing or making inaccessible materials that may serve as their feed, by poison spraying, fumigating, trapping or by another recog- nized .and legal pest elimination method. Grade shall mean the vertical location of the ground surface. Gross floor area is the suns of the horizontal areas of the several floors of all buildings on a lot, measured from the exterior faces of exterior walls or from the center line of walls separating two (2) buildings. Habitable space (room) is space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating or cooking. Bathrooms, toilet compartments, closets, halls, storage or utility space, and similar areas are not considered habit- able space. Infestation shall mean the presence, within or contiguous to a dwelling or premises, of noxious insects, rodents, vermin or other pests. Multiple dwelling. a building or portion thereof containing two (2) or more dwelling units. Occupant shall mean any person living and sleeping in a dwelling unit or having actual possession of said dwelling or rooming unit. Openable area shall mean that part of a window or door which is available for unobstructed ventilation and which opens directly to the outdoors. Operator shall mean any person who has charge, care or control of a multiple residence or rooming house, in which dwelling units or rooming nits are let or offered for occupancy. g . p Y Owner shall mean owner or owners of the freehold of the premises or lesser estate therein, a mortgagor or vendee in possession, as- signee of rents, receiver, executor, trustee, lessee or other person, 513 19 19-95 MAPLEWOOD CODE firm or corporation in control of a building, including their manag- ers and agents. Person shall mean an individual, firm, corporation, association or partnership. Plumbing or plumbing fixtures shall mean water heating facili- ties, water pipes, gas pipes, garbage disposal units, water closets, waste pipes, sinks, installed dishwashers, lavatories, bathtubs, shower baths, installed clothes - washing machines or other similar equip- ment, catch basins, drains, vents, or other similarly supplied fix- tures, together with all connections to water, gas, sewer or vent lines. - Premises shall mean a lot, plot or parcel of land, including the building or structures thereon. Rental dwelling. Any building or portion thereof which is desig- nated or used primarily for residential purposes, which is rented or leased to another and not owner - occupied. Residence building shall mean a building in which sleeping ac- commodations or sleeping accommodations and cooking facilities as a unit are provided. Residential property shall mean a building in which sleeping accommodations or sleeping accommodations and cooking facilities as a unit are provided. Rooming house shall mean any residence building, or any part - thereof, containing one or more rooming units, in which space is rented by the owner or operator to three (3) or more persons who are not husband or wife, son or daughter, mother or father, sister or brother of the owner or operator. Rooming unit shall mean any room or group of rooms forming a single habitable unit used or intended to be used for living and sleeping, but not having standard kitchen facilities. Supplied shall mean installed, furnished or provided by the owner or operator. . Ventilation shall mean the process of supplying and removing air by natural or mechanical means to or from any space. 514 20 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS 9 -97 Workmanlike. Whenever the words "workmanlike state of main- tenance and repair" are used in this chapter, they shall mean the standards of the trade or industry involved. L Yard shall mean all ground, lawn, court, walk, driveway or othef open space constituting part of the same premises as a residence building. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.040(4),6-5-80) Cross reference -Rules of construction and definitions generally, § 1 -41 et seq. Sec. 9 -96. Exterior property areas. All properties in the city under this article and the owners thereof shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Sanitation. All exterior property areas shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from any accumula- tion of refuse or garbage. (2) Grading and drainage. All premises shall be graded and .. maintained so as to prevent the accumulation of stagnant water, except 'in natural occurring ponding areas on said premises, or within any building or structure located thereon. .(3) Removal of snow and ice. The owner of a multiple family dwelling shall remove, or cause to be removed, all snow and ice from parking lots, driveways, steps and walkways on the premises, which may create a hazard to the public. (4) Free from noxious weeds. All exterior property areas shall be kept free from species of weeds or plant growth which are noxious or detrimental to the public health. (5) Insects and rodents. Every owner of a dwelling shall be responsible for the extermination of noxious insects, rodents, vermin or other pests in all exterior areas of the premises. (6) Accessory structures. All accessory structures, including de- tached garages, shall be maintained structurally sound and in good repair. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.060, 6 -5 -80) 7) Sec. 9 -97. Exteriors of structures. All properties in the city under this article and the owners thereof shall comply with the following requirements: 515 21 69-97 MAPLEWOOD CODE (1) Foundations, walls and roofs. Every foundation, exterior - 'wall, roof and all other exterior surfaces shall be maintained in a workmanlike state of maintenance and repair: L a. The foundation elements shall adequately support the building at all points. b. Every exterior wall shall be free of holes, breaks, loose or rotting boards or timbers, falling or loose stucco or brick, substantial amounts of peeling paint and any conditions which might admit moisture to the interior portions of the walls or to the interior spaces of the dwelling. c. The roof shall be tight and have no defects which admit rain, and roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent rain water from causing dampness in the walls. (2) Stairs, porches and railings. a. Every outside stair, every porch and every appurtenance attached thereto shall be so constructed as to be safe in use and capable of supporting a load as determined in the building code, and shall be kept in sound condition and goad repair. b. Every flight of stairs which is more than four (4) risers high shall have hand rails which are to be so located as determined by the building code; and every porch which 'is more than eighteen (18) inches above grade shall have rails so located and capable of restraining a horizontal pressure, as determined by the of the build= ing code. (3) Windows, doors and hatchways. Every window, exterior door and hatchway shall be substantially tight and shall be kept in sound condition and repair. a. Every window shall be fully supplied with window panes which are without open cracks or holes. b. Every window sash shall be in good condition and fit reasonably tight within its frame. c. Every window, other than a fixed window, shall be ca- pable of being easily opened and shall be held in an open or closed position by window hardware. 516 22 1 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9.98 d. Every exterior door, door hinges or door latch shall be in • good condition. e. Every exterior door, when closed, shall fit reasonably well within its frame. L Every window, door and frame shall be constructed and maintained in relation to the adjacent wall construc- tions, as to exclude rain, and substantially to exclude wind from entering the dwelling. g. Every hatchway shall be so constructed and maintained as to prevent the entrance of rodents, rain and surface drainage water into the dwelling. h. Every door available as an exit in a dwelling shall be capable of being opened from the inside, easily and with- out the use of a key, or special knowledge or effort. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.070 Sec. 9 -98. Interior structures. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall meet the following requirements: (1) Free from dampness. All cellars, basements and crawl spaces shall be maintained reasonably free from dampness to pre - - vent conditions conducive to decay and deterioration of the structure. (2) Structural members. The supporting structural members shall be maintained structurally sound; that is, showing no evi- dence of deterioration and being capable of bearing; imposed loads in acc9rdance with the provisions of the building code. (3) Interior stairs and railings. • a. All interior stairs shall be maintained in sound condi- tion and good repair by replacing treads and risers that evidence excessive wear or are broken, warped or loose. Every inside stair shall be so constructed and maintained as to be safe to use and capable of supporting a load, as determined by the provisions of the building code. b. Every stairwell and every flight of stairs, which is more than fou_ (4) risers high, shall have handrails or railings so located in accordance with the provisions of the build- ing code. 517 23 19-98 MAPLEWOOD CODE c. Every handrail or railing must be firmly fastened and must be maintained in good condition. Properly secured railings, capable of bearing normally imposed loads as determined by the building code, shall be placed on the open portions of the stairs, balconies, landings and stairwells. (4) Bathroom floors. Every toilet room floor surface and bath- room floor surface shall be constructed and maintained so as to be substantially impervious to water and so as to permit such floor to be easily kept in a clean and sanitary condition. (5) Sanitation. The interior shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, free from accumulation of refuse or garbage. (6) Insect and rodent harborage. The owner of every dwelling shall be responsible for the extermination of noxious insects, rodents, vermin or other such pests whenever an infestation exists in the interior of the dwelling. (7) Interior walls, floors, ceilings and woodwork. All interior walls, floors, ceilings and associated woodwork or trim must be maintained in a sound condition and in a workmanlike repair. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.080,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -99. Basic facilities. The following facilities shall be required in every occupied dwell- ing unit in the city under this article: (1) Kitchen facilities. Every kitchen shall include the following: a. A. kitchen sink in good working condition, properly con- nected to an approved water supply system, which pro- vides at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated running water under pressure, and which is connected to an approved sewer system. b. Cabinets or shelves for the storage of eating, drinking and cooking equipment and utensils and for food that does not require refrigeration for safekeeping; and a counter or table for food preparation. Said cabinets or shelves and counter or table shall be adequate for the permissible occupancy of the dwelling unit and shall be of sound construction, finished with surfaces that are 518 24 V^ ` 1 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -99 easily cleanable and that will not impart any toxic or deleterious effect to food. c. A stove or similar device for cooking food, and a refrig- erator or similar device for the safe storage of food, L which are properly installed with all necessary connec- tions for safe, sanitary and efficient operation; provided - w • that, such stove, refrigerator or similar devices need not be installed when a dwelling unit is not occupied and when the occupant is expected to provide same on occu- pancy, in which case sufficient space and adequate con- nections for the installation and operation of said stove, refrigerator or similar device must be provided. (2) Toilet facilities. Within every dwelling unit there shall be a nonhabitable room with an entrance door which affords pri- vacy to a person within said room and which room is equipped with a flush water closet in good working condition. Said flush water closet shall be equipped with easily cleanable surfaces, shall be connected to an approved water system that at all times provides an adequate amount of running • water under pressure to cause the water closet to operate properly, and shall be connected to an approved sewer system. (3) Lavatory sink. Within every dwelling unit there shall be a lavatory sink. Said lavatory sink may be in the same room as the . flush water closet, or if located in another room, the lavatory sink shall be located in close proximity to the door leading directly into the room in which said water closet is located. The lavatory sink shall be in good working condition and shall -be properly connected to an approved water supply system and shall provide at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated running water under pressure and shall be connected to an approved sewer system. Water inlets for lavatory sinks shall be located above the overflow rim of these facilities. (4) Bathtub or shower Within every dwelling unit there shall be a room. which affords privacy to a person within said room and which is equipped with a bathtub or shower in good working conditions. Said bathtub or shower may be in the ' same room as the flush water closet, or in another room, and 519 25 19-99 MA.PLEWOOD CODE shall be properly connected to an approved water supply • system and shall provide at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated water under pressure, and shall be connected to an approved sewer system. Water inlets for L bathtubs shall be located above the overflow rim of these L : facilities. (5) Door locks and security. All exterior doors of dwelling shall be equipped with functional locking devices. Multiple family - dwellings shall be furnished with door locks as follows: a. For the purpose of providing a reasonable amount of safety and general welfare for persons occupying multi - ple family dwellings, an approved security system shall be maintained for each multiple family building to con- trol access. The security system shall consist of locked building entrance or foyer doors, and locked doors lead- ing from hallways into individual dwelling units. Dead latch type door locks shall be provided with lever knobs (or door knobs) on the inside of the building entrance doors and with key cylinders on the outside of the build- ing entrance doors. Building entrance door latches shall be of a type that are permanently locked from the out side and permanently unlocked from the inside. b. Every door that is designed to provide ingress or egress for a .dwelling unit within a multiple family building shall be equipped with an approved lock that is a dead- locking bolt that cannot be retracted by end pressure; provided, however, that such door shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special . knowledge or effort. (6) Removal of basic equipment or facilities. No owner, opera- tor or occupant shall cause any facility or equipment, which is required under this ordinance, to be removed from or shut off from any occupied dwelling unit, except for such tempo - ` • rary interruptions as may be necessary while actual repairs or alterations are in progress, or during temporary emergencies. (7) 'Connection to water and sewer system. Every kitchen sink, , lavatory basin, bathtub or shower and water closet required under the provisions of this section shall be properly con - 520 26 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS 19-100 netted to a public water and sewer system or to an approved private water and sewer system and shall be supplied with . i hot and cold running water. 1 (8) Water heating facilities. Every dwelling shall have supplied water heating facilities which are installed in an approved manner, properly maintained, properly connected with hot water lines, and which are capable of heating and delivering water to such a temperature as to permit an adequate amount of water to be drawn at every required kitchen sink, lavatory basin, bathtub, shower and laundry facilities or other similar units at a temperature of not less than one hundred twenty (120) degrees Fahrenheit. (9) Heating facilities. Every dwelling shall have heating facili- ties. The owner of said heating facilities shall be required to • see that said heating facilities are properly installed, safely maintained, and in good working condition. Said facilities shall be capable of safely and adequately heating all habit- able rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms located therein, to a • temperature consistent with state and federal guidelines at three (3) feet above the floor at all times when occupied. (10) Operation of heating facility and incinerator. Every heating or water heating facility and incinerator must be installed and must operate in accordance with the requirements of the building code. (Ord. No. 486, § 214-090,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -100. Installations and maintenance. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall meet the following requirements: (1) Plumbing fixtures. Every waterline, plumbing fixture and drain shall be properly installed, connected and maintained in working order, and must be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects and capable of performing the function for i which it was designed. All repairs and installations must be made in accordance with the provisions of the building code. (2) Plumbing systems. Every stack, waste and sewer line shall be so installed and maintained as to function properly and be kept free from obstructions, leaks and defects to prevent 521 27 i t 19-100. MAPLEWOOD CODE structural deterioration or a health hazard. All repairs and installations must be made in accordance with the provisions of the building code. (3) Heating equipment. Every space heating, cooking and water heating device located in a dwelling shall be properly in- stalled, connected, maintained and capable of performing the function for which it was designed in accordance with the provisions of the building code. (4) Electrical service, outlets, fixtures. All dwelling units shall be supplied with electrical service that is adequate to safely meet the electrical needs of the structure in accordance with the provisions of the building code. Every electrical outlet and fixture shall be installed, maintained and connected to the source of electrical power, in accordance with the provi- sions of the building code. • (5) All facilities and equipment. All required equipment and all building space and parts in every dwelling shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the building code. All housing facilities shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition so as not to breed insects and rodents or produce dangerous or offensive gases or odors. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.100, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -101. Light and ventilation. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall meet the following requirements: b Y P2Z �r ) Natural light in dwellings. Every dwelling unit shall have at least one window of approved size facing directly to the outdoors or to a court; provided that, if connected to a room or area used seasonably (e.g. porch), then adequate daylight must be possible through this interconnection. (2) Light in nonhabitable work space. In multiple dwellings, every furnace room, and all similar nonhabitable work space -shall have one supplied electric light fixture available at all times. (3) Light in public halls and stairways. Every public hall and inside stairway shall be lighted at all times with an illumina- 522 W i BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS 19-102 tion of at least five (5) lumens per square foot in the. darkest • portion of the normally traveled stairs and passageways. (4) Electric outlets required. All dwellings shall have an ade- quate number of electrical outlets and electrical lighting Ox- tures for normal usage, subject to the approval of the electri- cal inspector. (5) Adequate ventilation. Every dwelling shall have at least one window which can be easily opened or such other device as will adequately ventilate the dwelling. (6) Ventilation and light in bathroom and water closet com- partment. Every bathroom and water closet compartment shall have at least one window for light and ventilation, except that no window shall be required in bathrooms or water closet compartments equipped with an approved ven- tilation system. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.110,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -102. Minimum standards for safety from fire. All occupied dwellings in the city under this article shall comply with the applicable provisions of the fire prevention ordinances of the city and the following additional standards for safety from fire: (1) Exclusion of residence building from storing flammable liq- uid. No dwelling shall be located within a building contain- ing any business handling, dispensing or storing flammable liquids with a flash point of one hundred (100) degrees Fahr- enheit, as defined by the 1976 Edition of the NFPA Life Safety Code #101. (2) Exits. All exit requirements of the building code shall be complied with. (3) Cooking and heating equipment. All cooking and heating equipment, components and accessories, in every heating, cooking and water heating device shall be maintained free from leaks and obstructions, be properly vented and kept functioning properly so as to be free from fire, health and accident hazards. All installations and repairs shall be made in accordance with the regulations of the building code. 523 29 19 -102 MAPLEWOOD CODE (4) Smoke alarms. Approved U.L. smoke alarms, which are func- tional and in good working order, shall be provided in all dwellings, where required by state law. (Ord. No. 486, § • 214.120 6 -5 -80) Cross reference —Fire prevention and protection, Ch. 12. Sec. 9 -103. Responsibilities relating to the maintenance of dwelling unite. All properties in the city under this article, and the owners or occupants thereof, shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Maintenance of private areas. Every occupant of a dwelling shall keep in.a clean and sanitary condition, that part of the dwelling and premises thereof, which he occupies, controls or uses. r (2) Maintenance of shared or public areas. Every owner of a dwelling, containing two (2) or more dwelling units, shall maintain in a clean and sanitary condition the shared or public areas of the dwelling and premises thereof. ' (3) Disposal of garbage and refuse. Every occupant of a dwell- ` ing shall dispose of all his rubbish in a clean and sanitary manner consistent with chapter 16 of this Code. (4) Use and operation of supplied plumbing fixtures. Every occupant of a dwelling shall keep P g P the supplied plumbing fixtures therein clean and sanitary and shall be responsible ?' for the exercise of reasonable care in their proper use and P o eration. _ (5) Installation and care of plumbing fixtures furnished by occupant. Every plumbing fixture furnished by the occupant shall be properly installed; maintained in good working con- 1 dition; clean and sanitary; and free from defects, leaks or obstructions. (Ord. No. 486, § 214-130,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -104. Rooming houses. No person in the city shall operate a rooming house or shall • occupy or let to another for occupancy any rooming unit in any rooming house, except in compliance with the provisions of this section: 524 30 31 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9-104 At least Water closet, hand lavator and bath f acilities. one water closet, lavatory basin and bathtub or shower, properly connected to an approved water and sewer s and in g ood workin condition, shall be supplied for each four (4) rooms within a roomin house wherever said facilities are shared. All such facilities shall be located within the resi- dence buildin served and be directl accessible from a com- mon hall or passa to all persons sharing such facilities. Ever lavatory basin and bathtub or shower shall be sup- plied with hot and cold water at all times. (2) Minimum f loor area for sleeping purposes. Ever room oc- cupied for sleepin purposes by one person shall contain at least sevent (70) s feet of floor area. Ever room occu- pied for sleepin purposes b two (2) or more persons shall contain at least fift (50) s feet of floor area for each occupant thereof. (3). Bed linen and towels. The operator of ever roomin house shall chan supplied bed linen and towels therein at least once a week and prior to the lettin of an room to another occupant. The operator shall be responsible for the mainte- nance of all supplied beddin in a clean and sanitar manner. (4) Shades, drapes, etc. Ever window of ever roomin unit shall be supplied with shades, draw drapes or other devices or materials which, when properly used, will afford privac to the occupant of the roomin unit. (5) The operator of ever rooming house shall be responsible for the sanitary *Maintenance of all walls, floors and ceilin and for the sanitary maintenance of ever other part of the room- ' in house; and he shall be further responsible for the sanitary maintenance of the entire premises, where the entire struc- ture of buildin within which the rooming house is contained is leased or occupied b the operator. (6) Ever water closet, flush urinal, lavatory basin and bathtub or shower shall meet the desi standards of section 9-99 of this article and shall be located within a room or rooms which: a. Afford privacy and are separate from the habitable rooms. 525 31 r • 1 19-104 MAPLEWOOD CODE b. Are accessible from a common hall and without going outside the rooming house. (Ord. No.. 486, § 214.140 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -105. Vacant and unfit dwellings. The owner of any dwelling in the city, which has been declared unfit for human habitation, or which is otherwise vacant or a pe- t riod of sixty (60) days or more, shall make same safe and secure so that it is not hazardous to the health, safety and welfare of the public and does not constitute a public nuisance. Any vacant dwell- ing open at doors or windows, if unguarded, shall be deemed to be a 'hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public and a public nuisance within the meaning of this article. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.150, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -106. Hazardous buildings. In the event that a dwelling in the city under this article has been declared unfit for human habitation and the owner has not reme- • ; died the defects within a prescribed reasonable time, the dwelling may be declared a hazardous building and treated consistent with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.160, 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -107. Enforcement officer. It shall be the duty of the environmental health official and his authorized representatives to enforce the provisions of this article. Authorized representatives shall include the building inspectors, • the director of public safety or his representatives, or the health officer. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.170,6-5-80) Sec. 9-108. Inspections. The enforcement officer shall be authorized to make or cause to • be made inspections to determine the condition of dwellings and premises in the city under this article in order to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of the public. The enforcing officer, or his • designated representatives, shall be authorized to enter any dwell- ing or premises at any reasonable time for the purpose of perform - ing his duties under this article. If the owner, operator or person in 526 32 1 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS § 9 -110 possession of .the dwelling shall refuse to consent to the inspection and there is probable cause to believe that a violation exists within the particular structure, a search warrant may be obtained. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.180,6-5-80) Sec. 9 -109. Access by owner or operator. Every occupant of a dwelling in the city under this article shall give the owner or operator thereof, or his agent or employee, access to any part of such dwelling unit, rooming unit or its premises, at reasonable times, for the purpose of affecting inspection and main- tenance, making such repairs, or making such alterations as are necessary to comply with the provisions of this article. (Ord. No. 486, .§ 214.190 i Sec. 9 -110. Compliance orders. Whenever the enforcement officer determines that any dwelling, . dwelling unit or rooming unit in the city under this article, or the premises surrounding any of these, fails to meet the provisions of this article, he may issue a compliance order setting forth the viola- tions of the article and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violations. This compliance order shall: (1) Be in writing. (2) Describe the location and nature of the violations of this article. 3 Establish a time for the correction of such violation and notify of appeal recourse. P (4) Be served upon the owner, his agent or the occupant, as the case may require.. Such notice shall be deemed to be properly served upon such owner, agent or upon any such occupant, if a copy thereof is: . a. Served upon him personally, or b. Sent by registered or certified snail to his last known address, or c. Upon failure to effect notice through a. or b. above, as set out in this section, posted at a conspicuous place in _ or about the dwelling which is affected by the notice. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.200,6-5-80) 527 33 1 9.111 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sec. 9 -111. Variances. pp A eals of interpretation or variance under this article shall be . . made to the city manager. If not satisfied,. further appeal may be made to the board of adjustments and appeals according to estab- lished city procedures. The board will hear requests for variance • and interpretation of this article. The board may grant variances in instances where the strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and when it is demonstrated that such action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this article. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.214 6 -5 -80) Sec. 9 -112. Violations. . An person, firm or corporation failing to comply with the provi- YP signs of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and subject to prosecution. (Ord. No. 486, § 214.211,6-5-80) Secs. 9- 113 -9 -129. Reserved. 34 St. Paul Truth -In -Sale of Housing Disclosure Report a a -- (Carefully read this enure report) y Page ._-- of t he when the house is shown to prospective buyers, and Nonce: A co py of this Report must be publicly displayed at the premises ' to the buyer prior to the time of signing a Purchase Agreement. a copy of this Report must be provided Y p OR EVALUATOR OF TI -IE FUTURE NOT A WARRANTY, BY THE CITY OF S.T. PAUL TORE. THIS REPORT IS N OF ANY BUILDING COMPONENT OR FIX US EFUL LIFE, OR THE FUTURE CONDITION Address of Evaluated Dwelling: Owner's Name: Listin g Agent and Agency: • ---- Condo � - • S ing l e Famil Duplex --To Ty of Dwell S g Y Yp Comments: This report is NOT VALID unless the following declaration is signed and a copy is submitted to the buyer. HOMEOWNER/AGENT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: S OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE ..--- ARE NOT_. -- CODE OWNER OR AGENT OF THE OWNER, DECLARE THAT A PU BLIC HEALTH, HOUSIN G CODE I, THE �? VIOLATION. ORDERS PENDING ON THIS PROPERTY FROM THE DIVISION OF PU ENFORCEMENT ORCEMENT OR OTHER ST. PAUL CITY AGENCIES. ER DECLARE, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING ANY FLOOD I FURTH DAMAGE, SE WER BACK -UP OR WATER SEEPAGE AT THIS PROPERTY: Date Signature of the Owner or Legal Representative This Report: buyer and seller prior to the time of sale. M ' inimum standards for this report are as 1. is intended to provide basic information to the home buy p e rt WILL NOT be used to enforce the requirements of the ned in the Saint Paul Housing Maintenance Code (Chapter 34). This r e po rt contai Housing Maintenance Code. ' ' the building or any building component, nor of the accuracy of this report. 2. is not warranty, by the City of St. Paul, of the conditon of g i • e time of the evaluation. The Evaluator is not I covers y required to ignite die the items listed on the form and only those sterns visible at the valuate inaccessible areas. heating plan t , • use a ladder to observe the condition of the roofing. disassemble items ore u Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA). m g 4. y be based upon different standards than the lender, Federal 5, is valid for one year from the date of issue and only for the owner named on this report. Q uestions regarding this report should be directed to the evaluator* laints regarding this report should be directed to the Division sion of Public Ilealth, Truth • in -Sale of housing, 555 Cedar Street, C om p St. Paul, MN 55101, Phone No. 298 -4153. DATE: Rev 12/89 EVALUATOR: 35 Attachment 5 Property. Address. I'M " = Meets minimum requirements - the item complies with the minimum Housing Code requirements. "I1 = Below minimum requirements - the item is below minimum Housing Code requirements. "C" = Comments - the item cannot be adequately evaluated or it has some deficiency, but the deficiency is insufficient to make the item below minimum requirements. = Hazardous - the item in its present condition may endanger the health and safety of the occupant. „ Y" = Yes "N " = No Any item marked "B ", "C" or "H" must have a written comment about the itdrn. Additional comment sheets may be attached if needed. Ttpm It rnmmpnk BASEMENT /CELLAR 1. Stairs and Handrails .......................... 2. , Basement/cellar floor .. ...................... . 3. Foundation ................................... 4. Evidence of dampness or staining ............ 5. First floor, floor system ....................... 6. Beams and columns .......................... ELECTRICAL SERVICE(S) # of Services . . 7. Service size: Amps: 30 _--- 60 100 150 Other Volts: 115 - 115/230 8. Electrical service installation /grounding ..... 9. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures ........ PI,L1M BINC SYSTEM 10. Floor drain(s) ................................. 11. Waste and vent piping . . .................... . 12. Water piping ... ............................... 13. Gas piping (all floors) ......................... 14. Water heater(s) installation ................... 15. Water heater(s) venting ...................... 16. Plumbing fixtures ............... ............. . HEATING SYSTEM 17. Heating plant(s): Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition ............ b. Viewed in operation ............ ............. . c. Combustion venting ............ ............. . The Evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant(s). I8. Additional heating unit(s) Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition .............. b. Viewed in operation .......................... c. Combustion venting .......................... 19. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS .............. Page of EVALUATOR: DATE: Rev 12/89 property Address: f "m" =Meets minimum requirements " B" = Below minimum rcquiremcnts KITCHEN ., � „ " _ s „ T .. "C" =Comments Hazardous "H Y Ye h = No .20. 'malls and ceiling ---------- - - - - -- .- _ - -- Ite # Comments 21. Floor condition and ceiling height ......... - 22. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 23. Electrical outlets and fixtures .............. 24. Plumbing fixtures .......................... . 25. Water flow . ............................... 26. Window size and openable area ........... 27. Window condition ........................ LIVING AND DINING ROOM(S) 28 Walls and ceiling - ................. . ...... . 29. Floor condition and ceiling height .......... 30. Evidence of dampness or staining - - - - - - - - - 31. Electrical outlets and fixtures ......... 32. Window size and openable area ........... 33. Window con d ition ... ........ . .. . ......... . HALLWAYS, STAIRS AND ENTRIES 34. Walls, ceilings and floors .. ............... . 35. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 36. Stairs and handrails to upper floors ........ 37. Electrical outlets and fixtures .............. 38. Window condition - - -- - - - - - - ----........ - - 39. Smoke detector (s). ......................... . Properly located - - - - - - - - - - - - BATHROOM(S) # of: Full Partial 40. Walls and ceiling -------------------------- 41 Floor condition ........................... 42. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 43. Electrical outlets and fixtures . ............. 44. Plumbing fixtures -------------------------- 45. Water flow --------------- -- ------ --- - - - --- 46. Window size and openable area or mechanical exhaust ....................... .47. Condition of windows or mechanical exhaust................................... SLEEPING ROOM(S) No. of: 48. Walls and ceiling --- ------------- ----------- 49. Floor condition, area, and ceiling height - - 50. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 51. Electrical outlets and fixtures ............. 52. Window size and openable area . - ........ . 53. Window condition ........................ ENCLOSED PORCHES AND OTHER ROOMS (Evaluator shall identify each additional room separately and comment when necessary.) 54. Walls, floor condition and ceiling height - - 55. Evidence of dampness or staining ......... 56. Electrical outlets and fixtures ............. 57. Window condition ........ ................. . ATTIC SPACE (Visible Areas) 58. Roof boards and rafters ------------ ------- 59. Evidence of dampness or staining ...... • . . 60. Electrical wiring/outlets /fixtures .......... 61. Ventilation ................................ 62. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS - -- - - - - - - - - Page of EVALUATOR: 37 DATE: Rev 12/89 ,perty Address: EXTERIOR (Visible Areas) 61 Foundation . ............................ 64. Basement/cellar windows ........... '. . 65. Drainage (grade) .... ................. . 66. Exterior walls ......................... 67 Doors (frames /storms /screens) ........ 68. Windows (frames /storms /screens) ..... 69. Open porches, stairways and decks ... 70. Cornice and trim ...................... 71. Roof covering and flashing .......... . 72. Gutters and downspouts .............. 73. Chimneys ............................. 74. Outlets, fixtures and service entrance . GARAGE 75. Roof structure and covering ........... 76.. Wall structure and covering ........... 77. Slab condition .. _ .. _ .................. . 78. Garage doors .. ........................ . 79. Garage opener- (see important notice #6) 80. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures .. . Meets minimum requirements "B" = Below minimum requirements C _ Comments "I1" = Hazardous "Y" = Yes "N"= No Item # Comments I hereby certify that the above report is made in compliance with the St. Paul Housing Code, Chapter 34, and that I have utilized the care and diligence, reasonable and ordinary, for meeting the certification standards prescribed b y the Truth - In - Sale of Housing Ordinance, Chapter 189. I have found no instance of non - compliance with the items listed above as of the date of this report, except those designated herein. Evaluator Signature Phone Number Date THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE NOT MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ST. PAUL HOUSING. THEIR INCLUSION ON THIS FORM IS ONLY TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO THE BUYER. NO DETERMINATION IS MADE WHETHER THE ITEMS MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, ENERGY INFORMATION Type of Insulation Approx. NV INSULA'T'ION YP Inches NA 81. Attic Insulation ....................... . 82. Wall Insulation ........................ 83. Kneewall Insulation 84. Rim Jorst Insulation. ................... 85. Storm Doors ........................... NV = Not Visible 86. Storm Windows ....................... NA = Not Applicable WEATHERSTRIPPING 87. Doors ................................... 88. Windows ............................... FIR EPLA CE/WO ODSTOVES 89. Dampers installed in fireplaces ........ 90. Installation ............................ Page of 91. Condition .............................. Rev 12/89 IMPORTANT NOTICES 1. Any single family residence in St. Paul must have at least one smoke detector connected to the electrical system. The detector must be located near sleeping rooms. For more information call Fire Prevention, 228 -6230 2. Rainleaders connected to the sanitary sewer system must be disconnected. For more information call Public Works, Sewer Division, 298 -5421. 3. Any house built before 1950 may have lead paint own it. If children eat lead paint, they can be poisoned. For more information call Division of Public Health, 292 -7746 4. The City of St. Paul or the Evaluator are not responsible for the determination of the presence of airborne particles such as asbestos, noxious gases, such as radon or other conditions of air quality that may be present, nor the conditions which may cause the above. . If this building is used for any purpose other than a single family dwelling, it may be illegally zoned. To help you determine legal uses �. under the zoning ordinance, contact the Zoning Administrator at 2984584. 6) Automatic garage doors should reverse upon striking an object. If it does not reverse, it oses a serious hazard and should be repaired s P p r or replaced immediately. Pico MAPLEWOOD TRUTH -IN -SALE OF SINGLE - FAMILY HOUSING DISCLOSURE REPORT (Carefully read this entire report) Address of Evaluated Dwelling Owner's Name: Owner's Address: Telephone: (w) (h) Listing Agent and Agency: Telephone: (w) (h) IMPORTANT NOTICES 14l This report is intended to provide basic information to the property buyer and seller prior to the time of sale. A copy of this report must be publicly displayed at the premises when the property is shown to prospective buyers, and a copy of this report must be provided to the buyer prior to the time of sale or the signing of a purchase agreement or other contractual agreement. Applicable parts of this report may be used to enforce the requirements of the Maplewood City Code. Such enforcement will not effect the sale of the property. 2. This report is not a warranty of the current or future condition of the building or any building component nor is it a warranty of compliance with the building code. 3. The City of Maplewood does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. 4. The leader, FHA or VA may have different standards. 5. This report is valid for one year from the date it is issued and only for the owner named on this report. 6. Questions regarding this report should be directed to the evaluator, owner or the owner's agent. 7. Complaints regarding this report should be directed to the Community Development Department, Maplewood City Hall, 1830 E. County Road B, Maplewood, MN 55109, (612) 770 -4560. 39 Attachment 6 PROPERTY OWNER /AGENT'S DISCLOSURE This report is NOT VALID unless the following declarations are signed on the original cop submitted t Y o the buyer. I, the Owner or legal representative of the owner, declare, as of this date, the following information: 1. The following is a listing of the nature, of an water extent, causes and damage Y seepage, flooding or sewer backup due to flooding of any portion of this residential property: 2. There are are not city ode vi • orders from Y violations or pending housing om the City for this property. If there are any orders, list the date and nature of these orders or attach a copy of the order(s) to this report. 3. This property does does not have homestead classification a ve a current s of (date). For further information, contact Ramsey ount ' Records, Administration Y Taxation and n Department. 4. The following is a listing of the deed ' l restrictions and covenants that apply y to this property (attach a copy if necessary) : 5. This property i s i s not subje e ct to the Maplewood pipeline, shoreland or � flood plain ordinances. If so, the City's Community Development Dep artment special devel opment p should be contacted for s p lopment restriction information. G. The location of all known wells on the property, the date the well water was la st tested, if the well (s) are in use or abandoned and sealed (State law requires abandoned andoned wells to be sealed under certain conditions by a licensed water - well contractor). Please contact the Minnesota Department of Health for more information. The following is a description of where all known wells on t attach a m he property are located ( map if necessary): 40 7. This residential property is is not . al 'sanitary connected to and served by munici P nitary sewer service. If the property is not served by municipal sanitary ewer service, tic to Y ice, I declare that the septic tank was last pumped on and that the attached map shows the approximate location of the septic tank and d �' to the best rain fields on the property of the owner's knowledge. 8. The property is is not direct) abutting 69 000 vol Y tong to high voltage C is or more) transmission l Plea contact NS P, Electric Engineering Dep artment, 0 for more information, P ent, at 779 -3100 tion. Signature of the legal owner or owner's designated representative: Date HOUSING INSPECTOR'S DISCLOSURE Please note the following: 1. This report covers only the items listed o the form and only those items visible at the time of the evaluation. The evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant, use a ladder to observe the condition of the roofing, disassemble items or evaluate inaccessible areas. 2. Any structure built before 1950 may have 1 ' Y lead paint on /in it. If children eat lead paint, they can be poisoned. For more information, call the Environmental Health Officer, er, 3• The City of Maplewood or the evaluator are ' ' not responsible for the determination of the presence of airborne particles such as asbestos, noxious gases, such as radon o conditions of air ualit r other q y that may be present, or the conditions which may cause the above. 4. If the subject property is located near a ' high- voltage electrical transmission line, purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on exposure to ' hi p a magnetic field generated b y high-voltage transmission lines. At this time, no risk assessment has been made. 5. Automatic garage doors should reverse upon ' object. If it does p n striking an not reverse, it poses a serious hazard and should be repaired or replaced immediately. 6. If this building is used for an purpose dwelling, Y Pu P other than a single-family lling, it may be illegally zoned. To determine your legal uses under the Maplewood p d City Code, contact the Community Development Department at 770 -4560. 41 Ke • "M" = Meets minimum housing code requirements, if applicable, or is in a safe, workmanlike condition, without an apparent deficiency. "B" = Below minimum housing code requirements, if applicable, or has a deficiency that may effect its intended use. "H" = Hazardous - -the item may endanger the health or safety of the occupant. "C" - Comments- -the item cannot be adequately evaluated or it has some deficiency, but the deficiency is insufficient to make the item below minimum housing code requirements or to effect its intended use. '► Y'► = Yes I t N'► = No Any item marked "B", "C" or "H" must have a written comment about the item. Additional comment sheets may be attached if needed. (* ) = The items marked with an asterisk ( * are required to meet the standards of the Maplewood owner- occupied housing maintenance code for single dwellings. If any of these items do not appear to meet the applicable standard(s), a City Inspector may contact you to require compliance. Compliance orders will not effect the sale of the property. Item Comments EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS *1. Sanitation ... ............................... 2. Grading and. drainage ......................... *3.. Evidence of noxious weeds .................... EXTERIORS OF STRUCTURES (Visible Areas) 4. Foundations ... ............................... *5. Walls and siding ............................. 6. Roof covering and flashing ................... 7. Porches, stairways, railings and decks....... *8. Windows, doors and hatchways................. 9. Door locks and security ...................... 10. Gutters and downspouts....................... 11. Chimneys ...... ............................... 12. Electrical outlets, fixtures and serviceentrance ............................. Evaluator: Date 42 Item Comments GARAGE(S) OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 13. Roof structure and covering......,,,,-,,,,,,,, tZ *140 W a 1 1 s and s i d i n g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 Slab or floor condition ...................... 16. Garage doors .. ............................... 170 Garage door opener (See note No. 5.)......... 18. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures...... INTERIOR OF STRUCTURES -- BASEMENT /CELLAR 19. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 200 Structural members (beams, columns and firstfloor system) .................. 0000000 21. Stairs and handrails ......................... 22. Basement/ cellar floor ........................ 23. Foundation... 0 24. Walls and ceilings ........................... ELECTRICAL SERVICES) # of services.............. 25. Service size: Amps: 60 100 150 other Volts: 115 115/230 26. Electrical service installation /grounding.... 27. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures...... PLUMBING SYSTEM 28 . Floor drain (s} 29. Waste.and vent piping ........................ 30. Water piping .. ............................... 31. Gas piping (all floors)..,*,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 32. Water heater(s) (installation and venting)... 33. Plumbing fixtures ............................ 3 4 . Water f 1 ow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . HEATING SYSTEM 35. Heating plant(s): Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition.......... b. Viewed in operation ......... ................ C . Combustion venting ........................... NOTE: The Evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant(s). 36. Additional heating unit(s) Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition.......... b . Viewed in operation ......................... C Combustion venting .......................... Evaluator: Date: 43 Item Comments KITCHEN 37. Sink /water supply system ..................... 38. Cabinets or shelves .......................... 39. Walls and ceiling 40. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 41. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 42. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 43. Window.size and openable area ................ 44. Window condition ............................. BATHROOM(S) # of: Full Partial 45. Flush water closet ........................... 46 Lavatory sink . ............................... 47. Bathtub or shower...... 48. Walls and ceiling ............................ 49. Floor condition . .............................. 50. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 51. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 52. Window or mechanical exhaust............... 0* 53. Condition of windows or mechanical exhaust... LIVING AND DINING ROOM(S) 54. Walls and ceiling..... 55. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 56. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 57. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 58. Window size and openable area ................ 59. Window condition ............................. SLEEPING ROOM(S) No. of: 600 Wall s and ceiling, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 62. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 63. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 64. Window size and openable area ................ 65. Window condition ............................. ENCLOSED PORCHES AND OTHER ROOMS (Evaluator shall identify each additional room separately and comment when necessary.) 66. Walls, floor condition and ceiling height.... 67. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 68. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 69. Window condition ............................. HALLWAYS, STAIRS AND ENTRIES 70. Walls, ceiling and floors...... 71. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 72. Stairs and handrails......... 00000*0*000*000* 73. Electrical lights, outlets and fixtures...... 74. Window condition ............................. Evaluator: Date: 44 Item # Comments ATTIC SPACE (Visible Areas) 75. Roof boards and rafters ...................... 76. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 77. Electrical wiring /outlets /fixtures......... -.. 78. Ventilation ... ............................... INTERIOR AREAS 79. Sanitation .... ............................... 80. Smoke detector (s) ............................ Properlylocated ............................. ENERGY INFORMATION INSULATION 81. Attic insulation......... 82. Wall insulation.......... 83. Kneewall insulation...... 84. Rim Joist insulation..... 85. Storm doors... 690000060.00 86. Storm windows............ WEATHERSTRIPPING 8 7 .. Doors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88. Windows.................. FIREPLACE /WOODSTOVES 89. Dampers installed in fireplaces............... 90. Installation............. 91. Condition................ Type of Approx. Insulation Inches NV = Not Visible NA = Not Applicable NV NA I hereby certify that the above report is made incompliance with the MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE and that I have utilized the care and diligence, reasonable and ordinary, for meeting the certification standards prescribed by the Truth -In -Sale of Housing Ordinance, Article XII of Chapter 9. I have found no instance of noncompliance with the items listed above as of the date of this report, except those designated herein. Evaluator Signature Phone number 45 Date MAPLEWOOD TRUTH -IN -SALE OF OWNER- OCCUPIED ATTACHED HOUSING DISCLOSURE REPORT (Carefully read this entire report) Address of Evaluated Dwelling Owner's Name: Owner's Address: Telephone: (w) (h) Listing Agent and Agency: Telephone: (w) (h) Type of Residential Building: Number of Units: Single dwelling Townhouse Double dwelling Other Apartment Explain IMPORTANT NOTICES 10 This report is intended to provide basic information to the property buyer and seller prior to the time of sale. A copy of this report must be publicly displayed at the premises when the property is shown to prospective buyers, and a copy of this report must be provided to the buyer prior to the time of sale or the signing of a purchase agreement or other contractual agreement. Applicable parts of this report may be used to enforce the requirements of the Maplewood City Code. Such enforcement will not effect the sale of the property. 2. This report is not a warranty of the current or future condition of the building or any building component nor is it a warranty of compliance with the building code. 3. The City of Maplewood does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. 4. The lender, FHA or VA may have different standards. 5. This report is valid for one year from the date it is issued and only for the owner named on this report. 6. Questions regarding this report should be directed to the evaluator, owner or the owner's agent. 46 Attachment 7 7. Complaints regarding this report should be directed to the Community Development Department, Maplewood City Hall, 1830 E. County Road B, Maplewood, MN 5510.9 (612) 770 -45609 PROPERTY OWNER /AGENT'S DISCLOSURE i This report is NOT VALID unless the following declarations are signed on the original copy submitted to the buyer. I, the owner or legal representative of the owner, declare, as of this date, the following information: 1. The following is'a listing of the nature, extent, causes and damage of any water seepage, flooding or sewer backup due to flooding of any portion of this residential property: 2. There are are not city code violations or pending housing orders from the City for this property. If there are any orders, list the date and nature of these orders or attach a copy of the order(s) to this report. 3. This property does does not have a current homestead classification as of (date) . For further information, contact Ramsey County Taxation and Records Administration Department. 4. The following is a listing of the deed restrictions and covenants that apply to this property (attach a copy if necessary) : 50 This property is is not subject to the Maplewood pipeline, shoreland, or flood plain ordinances. If so, the City's Community Development Department should be contacted for special development restriction information. 6. The location of all known wells on the property, the date the well water was last tested, if the well(s) are in use, or abandoned and sealed (State law requires abandoned wells to be sealed under certain conditions by a licensed water - well contractor). Please contact the Minnesota Department of Health for more information. The following is a description of where all known wells on the property are located (attach a map if necessary): 47 7. This residential property is is not connected to and served by municipal sanitary sewer service. If the property is not served by municipal sanitary sewer service, I declare that the septic tank was last pumped on and that the attached map shower the approximate location of the septic tank and drain fields on the property to the best of the owner's knowledge. 8. The property is is not directly abutting to high voltage (69,000 volts or more) transmission lines. Please contact NSP, Electric Engineering Department, at 770 -3100 for more information. Signature of the legal owner or owner's designated representative: HOUSING INSPECTOR'S DISCLOSURE Please note the following: Date 1. This report covers only the items listed on the form and only those items visible at the time of the evaluation. The evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant, use a ladder to observe the condition of the roofing, disassemble items or evaluate inaccessible areas. 2. Any structure built before 1950 may have lead paint on /in it. If children eat lead paint, they can be poisoned. For more information, call the Environmental Health Officer, 770 -4560. 3. The City of Maplewood or the evaluator are not responsible for the determination of the presence of airborne particles such as asbestos, noxious gases, such as radon or other conditions of air quality that may be present, or the conditions which may cause the above. 4. If the subject property is located near a high - voltage electrical transmission line, purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on exposure to a magnetic field generated by high - voltage transmission lines. At this. time, no risk assessment has been made. 5. Automatic garage doors should reverse upon striking an object. If it does not reverse, it poses a serious hazard and should be repaired or replaced immediately. Key: "M" = Meets minimum housing code requirements, if applicable, or is in a safe, workmanlike condition, without an apparent deficiency. "B" = Below minimum housing code requirements,tif applicable, or has a deficiency that may effect its intended use. "H" = Hazardous - -the item may endanger the health or safety of the occupant. "C" = Comments - -the item cannot be adequately evaluated or it has some deficiency, but the deficiency is insufficient to make the item below minimum housing code requirements or to effect its intended use. "Y" = Yes "N" = NO Any item marked "B ", ''C" or "H" must have a written comment about the item. Additional comment sheets may be attached if needed. ( *) = The items marked with an asterisk ( *) are required to meet the standards of the Maplewood owner- occupied housing maintenance code. If any of these .items do not appear to meet the applicable standard(s), a. City Inspector may contact you to require compliance. Compliance orders will not effect the sale of the property. Item # Comments EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS * 1 . S an i t a t i on . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . Grading and drainage ......................... *3. Evidence of noxious weeds ...................( EXTERIORS OF STRUCTURES (Visible areas) 4 . F o u n d a t i on s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *5. Walls and siding ............................. G. Roof covering and flashing ................000 7. Porches, stairways, railings and decks....... *8. Windows, doors and hate ways ................. 9. Door locks and security ...................... 10 0 Gutters and downspouts ...................0000 11. C h i m n e y s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12. Electrical outlets, fixtures and serviceentrance .................0.0.00...... Evaluator: Date: 49 Iten Comments GARAGE(S) OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 13. Roof structure and covering .................. *14. Walls and siding ............................. 15. Slab or floor condition ...................... 16. Garage doors .. ............................... 17. Garage door opener (See Note No. 5).......... 18. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures...... INTERIOR OF STRUCTURES -- BASEMENT /CELLAR 19. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 20. Structural members (beams, columns and firstfloor system ) .......................... 21. Stairs and handrails ......................... 22. Basement /cellar floor ........................ 23. Foundation......... 24. Walls and ceilings ........................... ELECTRICAL SERVICE(S) # of Services.............. 25 Service size: Amps: 60 100 150 Other Volts: 115 115/230 26. Electrical service installation /grounding.... 27. Electrical wiring,.outlets and fixtures...... PLUMBING SYSTEM 2 8 . Fl o o r d r a i n ( s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29. Waste and vent piping ........................ 3 0 . Water p i p i n g . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31. Gas piping (all floors) ...................... 32. Water heater(s) (installation and venting)... 33. Plumbing fixtures ............................ 34. Water flow... HEATING SYSTEM 35. Heating plant(s): Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition.......... b. Viewed in operation ......................... C. Combustion venting .......................... NOTE: The Evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant(s). 36. Additional heating unit(s) Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition.......... b. Viewed in operation ......................... C . Combustion venting .......................... KITCHEN 37. Sink /water supply system ..................... 38. Cabinets or shelves .......................... 39. Walls and ceiling ............................ 40. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 41. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 42. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 43. Window size and openable area ................ 44. Window condition ............................. Evaluator: Date: 50 Item # Comments BATHROOM(S) # of: Full Partial 45 Flush water closet ........................... 46. Lavatory sink . ............................... - 47 . B a t h t u b or shower......... . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48. Walls and ceiling ............................ 49. Floor condition.............. 50. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 51. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 52. Window or mechanical exhaust ................. 53. Condition of windows or mechanical exhaust... LIVING AND DINING ROOM(S) 54. Walls and ceiling ............................ 55. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 56. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 57. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 58. Window size and openable area ................ 59. Window condition ............................. SLEEPING ROOM(S) No. of: 60. Walls and ceiling ............................ 61. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 62. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 63. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 64... Window size and openable area ................ 65. Window condition .............................. ENCLOSED PORCHES AND OTHER ROOMS (Evaluator shall identify each additional room separately and comment when necessary.) 66. Walls, floor condition and ceiling height.... 67. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 68. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 69. Window condition ............................. PUBLIC HALLWAYS, STAIRS AND ENTRIES 70. Walls, ceiling and floors .................... 71. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 72. Stairs and handrails ......................... 73. Electrical lights, outlets and fixtures...... 74. Window condition ............................. ATTIC SPACE (Visible Areas) 75. Roof boards and rafters ...................... 76. Evidence of dampness or staining............. 77. Electrical wiring/outlets /fixtures........... 78. Ventilation ... ............................... INTERIOR AREAS * 79. S a n i t a t i o n .. . . . . . 0 1 0: * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80. Smoke detector (s� ............................ Properlylocated ............................. Evaluator: Date: 51 ENERGY INFORMATION INSULATION 81. Attic insulation......... 82. Wall insulation.,........ 830 Kneewall insulation...... 84. Rim Joist insulation..... 85. Storm doors .............. 860 Storm windows............ WEATHERSTRIPPING 8 7 • Doors . . . . . . . . . . 88, ' Windows .................. FIREPLACE /WOODSTOVES 89. Dampers installed in fireplaces............... 90. Installation............. 91. Condition ................ Type of Approx . NV Insulation Inches NA 97 NV = Not Visible NA = Not Applicable I hereby certify that the above report • P is made in compliance with the MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE and that I have utilized the care and diligence, reasonable and ordinary, for meeting the certification the Tr g ertification standards prescribed b Y Truth-In-Sale of Housing Ordinance Attic Chapter 9. I have found no instance • le XII of of noncompliance with the items listed above as of the date of this report, except those designated herein. Evaluator Signature Phone number Date 52 MAPLEWOOD TRUTH -IN -SALE OF RENTAL HOUSING DISCLOSURE REPORT • (Carefully read this entire report Address of Evaluated Dwelling Owner's Name: Owner's Address: Telephone: (w) h C) Listing Agent and Agency: Telephone: (w) h C) Type of Residential Building: g• Number of Units: Single dwelling Townhouse Double dwelling Other Apartment Explain IMPORTANT NOTICES 10 This report is intended to rovide basic sic information to the property buyer and seller prior to the time of sale. A publicly di copy of this report must be p y p aged at the premises when the property is shown to prospective buyers, Y , a copy of this report must be provided to the buyer prior to the time of sale or the signing of a urchase agreement greemen.t or other contractual agreement* Applicable parts of this report ma req of y be used to enforce the re � the Maplewood City Code, Such enforcement will not effect the sale of the property. 2. This report is not a warranty of the current or ' future condition of the building or any building component nor is it a warranty of compliance with the bui lding code. 3. The City of Maplewood does not uarantee the this report, g accuracy of 4. The lender, FHA or VA may have different standards, 5. This report is valid for one year from the dat for the to �t i issued and only owner named on this report. 6. Questions regarding this report should be directed to the evaluator, owner or the owner's agent. 53 Attachm 8 7. Complaints regarding this report should be directed to the Community Development Department, Maplewood City Hall, 1830 E. County Road B. Maplewood, MN 55109, (612) 770 -45600 PROPERTY OWNER /AGENTS DISCLOSURE This report is NOT VALID unless the following declarations are signed on the original copy submitted to the buyer. I. the owner or legal representative of the owner, declare, as of this date, the following information: 1. The following is a listing of the nature, extent, causes and damage of any water seepage, flooding or sewer backup due to flooding of any portion of this residential property: 2. There are are not city code violations or pending housing orders from the City for this property. If there are any orders, list the date and nature of these orders or attach a copy of the order(s) to this report. 30 This property does does not have a current homestead classification as of (date). For further information, contact Ramsey County Taxation and Records Administration Department. 4. The following is a listing of the deed restrictions and covenants that apply to this property (attach a copy if necessary) : 5.. This property is is not subject to the Maplewood pipeline, shoreland, or flood plain ordinances. If so, the City's Community Development Department should be contacted for special development restriction information. 6. The location of all known wells on the property, the date the well water was last tested, if the well are in use, or abandoned and sealed (State law requires abandoned wells to be sealed under certain conditions by a licensed well - water contractor) . Please contact the Minnesota Department of Health for more information. The following is a description of where all known wells on the property are located (attach a map if necessary): 54 7. This residential property is is not connected to and served by municipal sanitary sewer service. If the property is not served by municipal sanitary sewer service, I declare that the septic tank was last pumped on and that the attached map shows the approximate location of the septic tank and drain fields on the property to the best of the owner's knowledge. 8. The property is is not . directly abutting to high voltage (69,000 volts or more) transmission lines. Please contact NSP, Electric Engineering Department, at 779 -3100 for more information. Signature of the legal owner or owner's designated representative: Date HOUSING INSPECTOR'S DISCLOSURE Please note the following: 1. This report covers only the items listed on the form and only those items visible at the time of the evaluation. The evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant, use a ladder to observe the condition of the roofing, disassemble items or evaluate inaccessible areas. 2. Any structure built before 1950 may have lead paint on /in it. If children eat lead paint, they can be poisoned. For more information, call the Environmental Health Officer, 770 -4560. 3. The City of Maplewood or the evaluator are not responsible for the determination of the presence of airborne particles such as asbestos, noxious.gases, such as radon or other conditions of air quality that may be present, or the conditions which may cause the above. 4. If the subject property is located near a high- voltage electrical transmission line, purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on exposure to a magnetic field generated by high - voltage transmission lines. At this tune, no risk assessment has been made. 5. Automatic garage doors should reverse upon striking an object. If it does not reverse, it poses a serious hazard and should be repaired or replaced immediately. 55 Key: "M" = Meets minimum housing code requirements, if applicable, or is in a safe, workmanlike condition, without an apparent deficiency. "B" = Below minimum housing code requirements,= if applicable, or has a deficiency that may effect its intended use. "H" = Hazardous - -the item may endanger the health or safety of the occupant. "C" = Comments - -the item cannot be adequately evaluated or it has some deficiency, but the deficiency is insufficient to make the item below minimum housing code requirements or to effect its intended use. Irylf = Yes "N" = No Any item marked "B", "C" or "H" must have a written comment about the item. Additional comment sheets may be attached if needed. ( *) = The items marked with an asterisk (*) are required to meet the standards of the Maplewood rental housing maintenance code. If any of these items do not appear to meet the applicable standard(s), a City Inspector may contact you to require compliance. Compliance orders will not effect the sale of the property. Item Comments *EXTERIOR PROPERTY AREAS 1. Sanitation ... ............................... 2. Grading and drainage ......................... 3. Evidence of noxious weeds .................... EXTERIORS OF STRUCTURES (Visible Areas) *4. Foundations ... ............................... *5o walls and siding ............................. *6. Roof covering and flashing ................... *7. Porches, stairways, railings and decks....... *8. Windows, doors and hatchways... 00000000000000 *9. Door locks and security ...................... 10. Gutters and downspouts....................... 11 . Ch i m n e y s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12. Electrical outlets, fixtures and serviceentrance ............................. Evaluator: Date: 56 Item Comments GARAGE(S) OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES 13. Roof structure and covering .................. 14. Walls and siding ............................. 15. Slab or floor condition ...................... 16. Garage doors... ............................ 17. Garage door opener (s ) ( See Note No, 5 ) .... . 18. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixture....... INTERIOR OF STRUCTURES -- BASEMENT /CELLAR *19. Evidence of dampness or staining............. *20. Structural members (beams, columns and floorsystem( s } } ............................. *21. Stairs and handrails ......................... *22. Bathroom floors .............................. 23. Basement /cellar floor ........................ 24. Foundation .... ............................... *25. Walls, floors, ceilings and woodwork......... *ELECTRICAL SERVICE(S) # of services............. 26. Service size: Amps: 60 100 150 Other Volts: 115 115/230 27. Electrical service installation /grounding.... 28. Electrical wiring, outlets and fixtures...... *PLUMBING SYSTEM 29. Floor drain( s} ............................... 30. Waste and vent piping ........................ 31. Water piping .. ............................... 320 Gas piping (all floors) .. ................... . 33. Water heater(s) ( installation and venting)... 34. Hot water temperature........................ 35. Plumbing ffixtures ............................ 36. Water flow.... *HEATING SYSTEM 37. Heating plant(s): Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition.......... b. Viewed in operation ......................... C Combustion venting .......................... NOTE: The Evaluator is not required to ignite the heating plant(s). 38. Additio.nal heating unit(s) Fuel: Type: a. Installation and visible condition.......... b. Viewed in operation ......................... C. Combustion venting........... Evaluator: Date: 57 Item Comments KITCHEN *39. Sink /water supply system ..................... *40. Cabinets or shelves .......................... *41. Stove /cooking device and refrigerator........ 42. Walls and ceiling ............................ 43. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 44. Evidence of dampness or staining............. *45. Electrical outlets and fixtures...... 46. Window size and openable area ................ 47. Window condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BATHROOM(S) # of: Full Partial *48. Flush water closet ........................... *49. Adequate water flow .......................... *50. Lavatory sink . ............................... * 51. B a t h t u b or shower, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52. Walls and ceiling ............................ 53. Floor condition .............................. 54. Evidence of dampness or staining............. *55. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. *56. Window or mechanical exhaust................. *57. Condition of windows or mechanical exhaust... LIVING AND DINING ROOM (S) 58. Walls and ceiling ............................ 59. Floor condition and ceiling height........... 60. Evidence of dampness or staining............. *61. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. *62. Window size and openable area ................ *63. Window condition ............................. SLEEPING ROOM(S) No of: 64. Walls and ceiling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65. Floor condition, area, and ceiling height.... 66. Evidence of dampness or staining............. *67. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. *68. Window size and openable area................ *69. Window condition ............................. ENCLOSED PORCHES AND OTHER ROOMS (Evaluator shall identify each additional room separately and comment when necessary.) 70. Walls, floor condition and ceiling height.... 71. Evidence of dampness or staining............. *72. Electrical outlets and fixtures.............. 73. Window condition ............................. PUBLIC HALLWAYS, STAIRS AND ENTRIES 74. Walls, ceiling and floors .................... 75. Evidence of dampness or staining ............. *76. Stairs and handrails ......................... *77. Electrical lights, outlets and fixtures...... 78. Window condition ............................. Evaluator: Date: 0 Item 4 Comments .ATTIC SPACE (Visible Areas ) 79. Roof boards and rafters. 80. Evidence of dampness or staining............., 81. Electrical wiring /outlets /fixtures........... 8 2 . Vent i 1 at i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INTERIOR AREAS 8 3 . S an i t a t i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . *84. Smoke detector (s) ............................ *Properly located ............................ ENERGY INFORMATION INSULATION 85. Attic insulation......... 86. Wall insulation.......... 87. Kneewall insulation...... 88. Rim Joist insulation..... 89. Storm doors.............. .90. Storm windows............ WEATHERSTRIPPING 91. Doors .................... 92. Windows.................. FIREPLACE /WOODSTOVES 93. Dampers installed in fireplaces............... 94. Installation............. 95. Condition................ Type of Approx. NV Insulation Inches NA NV = Not Visible NA = Not Applicable I hereby certify that the above report is made in compliance with the MAPLEWOOD CITY CODE and that I have utilized the care and diligence, reasonable and ordinary, for meeting the certification standards prescribed by the Truth -In -Sale of Housing Ordinance, Article XII of Chapter 9. I have found no instance of noncompliance with the items listed above as of the date of this report, except those designated herein. Evaluator Signature Phone number 59 Date MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 10, 1989 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Fis her cal ed the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL HRA Commission Lorraine Fischer, Dale Carlson, Tom Conn lly City Staff: Geoff son, Ken Roberts 6, UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Truth -in- Housing Ordinance Geoff Olson presented the staff report concerning the adoption of a truth -in- housing ordinance. Dan Niezgocki, a Maplewood resident and a truth -in- housing evaluator, asked if this ordinance would apply to residential single- family homes only. Geoff Olson said this proposed ordinance would apply to all residential properties. A representative of the Minnesota Board of Realtors acknowledged Geoff Olson for his time and efforts in his prior meeting with a number of the realty members. Commissioner Dale Carlson moved the Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority: i. Adopt the truth -in -sale of housing ordinance and reevaluate it after it has been in effect for one year., 2. Adopt the resolution establishing a $15 filing fee for each report. Commissioner Tom Connelly seconded Ayes- -all 3. APPROVAL OF INU S A. November 5, 1988 Commiss r Carlson moved approval of the minutes of Novemb r 15, 1989, as submitted. 60 Attachment 9 HRA -4- Minutes 10 -10 -89 Commi sioner Connelly seconded es- -all D. Per Diem \for Board Members After disc sion by the commission rs, the consensus of the commiss n was to have an an al dinner with the other commis, and City Coun 1. M W Interviews for New 69mmission Memb,drs Ken Roberts informed \aan co/date oners that Steve Jelinek has withdrawn his namr tment'to the HRA and that , also, he was unable to tan Coobs and does not know if Mr. Coobs is still for appointment. Commissioner Fischer said g he was contacted by a housing inspector who asked if t e RA would be interested in a tour demonstrating the dutie of a housing inspector. The truth -in- housing g rdinanc as it applies to mobile homes, was discussed Ken Ro its said he would investigate which jurisdiction ill handle the mobile home area regarding the prop sed truth -in housing ordinance. Gary Pearson and Larry Whitcomb w re interviewed as possible HRA commission embers. Commissioner onnelly moved the HRA ecommend to the City Council the ppointment of Gary Pear n and Larry Whitcomb to the HRA o fill the two existing v cancies. Commissioner Carlson seconded Unfinished Business A. Truth -in- Housing ordinance Ayes - -all At this time the commission reintroduced the proposed truth -in- housing ordinance and discussed the possibility of including the owner's disclosure of covenants. Commissioner Carlson moved the inclusion on page 7 of the proposed truth -in- housing ordinance of Item (b) (2) f. " Disclosure of any private covenants that run with the property ". Commissioner Connelly seconded Ayes - -all 61 Ken Roberts presented the staff report, including a draft single- family residential inspection form, regarding the truth -in- housing ordinance. Dan Niezgocki, a Maplewood resident and a truth -in- housing evaluator, commented on a number of specific items in the proposed inspection form. Karen Christopherson of the Minnesota Board of Realtors noted that her group is for truth -in- housing disclosure but is against any code compliance with truth -in- housing disclosure activities. The realtors also questioned staff and the commissioners on the contents'of the proposed single- 62 Attachment 10 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MARCH 13, 1990 L 16* CALL TO ORDER ' Chairman Fischer called the meeting to s order at 7:05 p.m. 20 ROLL CALL HRA Commissioners: Lorraine Fischer, Dale Carlson, Tom Connelly, Gary Pearson, Larry Whitcomb City Staff: Ken Roberts 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. October 10, 1989 Commissioner Connelly moved approval of the minutes of October 10, 1989, as submitted.. Commissioner Carlson seconded Ayes - -all 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA -Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Commissioner Carlson seconded Ayes- -all 5. COMMUNICATIONS f r 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Truth -in- Housing Ordinance Ken Roberts presented the staff report, including a draft single- family residential inspection form, regarding the truth -in- housing ordinance. Dan Niezgocki, a Maplewood resident and a truth -in- housing evaluator, commented on a number of specific items in the proposed inspection form. Karen Christopherson of the Minnesota Board of Realtors noted that her group is for truth -in- housing disclosure but is against any code compliance with truth -in- housing disclosure activities. The realtors also questioned staff and the commissioners on the contents'of the proposed single- 62 Attachment 10 family residential housing inspection form. Points,of concern included the wording in the proposed inspection form regarding the possibility of code compliance, homestead taxes, wells, and high voltage electric transmission lines. The wording for a number of the items, including sanitation, vermin, weeds, .4moke detectors, ice and snow removal, to be inspected.were also discussed. Staff, the-HRA, and the realtors discussed revised wording for the areas of concern. The HRA recommended that truth -in- housing have disclosure only for owner- occupied units. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Housing Plan Update Steve Riley o f BRW presented the first d ra f t of the housing plan update. Commissioner Fischer commented on the housing goals in the plan. The HRA directed Mr.. Riley to revise the draft plan with their comments and staff comments. B. HRA Incorporation into the Planning Commission Report The commissioners tabled comment on this matter until their next meeting. C. Commission Appreciation Dinner The commissioners were notified of the dinner planned for April 21. + 8. Date of Next Meeting The date of the next meeting was discussed with staff and the commissioners. 10. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m. 63 MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 10, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Fischer called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL HRA Commissioners: Lorraine Fischer, Dale Carlson, Tom Connelly, Gary Pearson, Larry Whitcomb City Staff: Geoff Olson 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. March 13, 1990 The HRA tabled the approval of these minutes until the next meeting. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the agenda as submitted. 5. COMMUNICATIONS 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Truth -in- Housing Ordinance Geoff Olson presented the staff report, including draft inspection forms, regarding the truth -in- housing ordinance. The HRA, Board of Realtors and Dan Niezgocki (a Maplewood resident and truth -in- housing evaluator) discussed many changes to the truth -in- housing ordinance and inspection forms. They are as follows: (1) In Section 9 -238 (a), it was recommended that a statement be added which states that the inspection form is to be filed with the City within 15 days of it being prepared and that if it is not a double filing fee would be collected. (2) Section 9 -240 (a): Including a statement that if an inspectors license is revoked in St. Paul that it would be automatically be revoked in Maplewood. (3) Section 9 -243: The validity of this section was questioned. It was recommended that the City Attorney review this section. 1 64 Attachment 11 . (4) In the Housing Inspector's Disclosure section of the inspection form(s), item #4 regarding high- voltage electric transmission lines, the wording was revised so that approximately one -half of the wording was eliminated. (5) In the listing of the items to be checked by an inspector, items 1, 25, 47, 55, 64, 71, 77, 84 and 89 were revised by dropping "including evidence of insects, rodents or pests." (6) Item 3 was changed from "Free from" to "Evidence of noxious weeds." (7) Item 10 was dropped. (8) Under the Plumbing System section, a new item for water flow was added. (9) Items 72 and 83, smoke detector(s) were moved to a new section titled "Interior Areas ". (10) A new section was added after "Attic Space" titled "Interior Areas ". This section is to have an item on sanitation and an item on smoke detectors. (11) On the Owner- occupied inspection form, item 3, snow and ice removal, was deleted. In addition to the changes listed above, a question was raised about the inspection of manufactured homes. Staff was directed to investigate what other communities do in this regard. Commissioner Pearson agreed to also research this matter and report back at the next HRA meeting. The realtors association felt that a certificate of occupancy program for rental properties would be a benefit to the City and to renters. B. Housing Plan Update. Steve Riley of BRW presented the second draft of the housing plan update. The HRA and Mr. Riley discussed a number of changes for the plan. They are: (1) Updating the housing characteristics table to include more current information and changing the term tenure to type of occupancy. (2) Adding a table on the number of subsidized housing units in the City, County and region. (3) Adding information on the City's use of PUD provisions. 2 v MINUTES MAPLEWOOD HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAY 8 1`990 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Fischer 2. ROLL CALL HRA Commissioners: Gary Pearson, City Staff: Ken Rol Commisioner Carlson 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. Lorraine Fischer, Tom Connelly., Larry Whitcomb :Derts was absent. A. March 13, 1990 B. April 10, 1990 The HRA moved the approval of these minutes until later in the meeting. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Connelly moved, and Commisioner Whitcomb seconded approval of a revised agenda. This included moving the approval of the minutes to after the new business so that the applicants and interested persons could be heard sooner. Ayes all. 5. COMMUNICATIONS 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Truth -in- Housing Ordinance Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the latest staff report, including revised inspection forms, regarding the truth -in- housing ordinance. The HRA, Board of Realtors and Dan Niezgocki ( a Maplewood resident and truth -in- housing evaluator) discussed changes to the latest truth -in- housing ordinance and inspection forms. They are as- follows. (1) In Section 9 -238 (a), it was recommended that a statement be added which states that the disclosure report is to be at the residential building within 3 days of the property being listed. 66 Attachment 12 (2) on the single- family disclosure form, the asterisk on item #79, sanitation, was removed. In addition to the changes listed above, a question was raised about the inspection of manufactured homes. Mr. Roberts and Commissioner Pearson explained that since these units are very unique in their construction, they should not be included in the truth -in- housing inspections. Mr. Pearson also explained how units for sale have to meet the standards of the state as well as those of the park in which they are going to be located. The realtors association felt that a certificate of occupancy program for rental properties would be a benefit to the City and to renters. The HRA and the realators association recommend the use of disclosure only (no code enforcement) of information gathered through the truth -in- housing .inspections. A question was raised about the City of St. Paul truth - in- housing disclosure information and how it is used. This specifically was a concern with code enforcement activities and the designation of a "City officer" responsible for code enforcement. Staff was requested to investigate how St. Paul handles disclosure verses code enforcement if a potential problem is identi.f ied by a truth -in- housing inspection. Commissioner Connelly moved and Commissioner Whitcomb seconded the following recommendations: 1. The City Council adopt the truth -in- housing ordinance for rental housing and that they adopt a truth -in- housing ordinance for owner occupied housing with disclosure only. 2. The City Council adopt the resolution approving a $15 filing f ee for each report. Ayes all. The motion passed. It was noted that the ordinance should get its first reading with the City Council meeting on May 31, 19900 ITEM 7A. Tax - exempt financing request for the Maplewood Rental Townhouses The HRA moved this item up since the applicant was present. Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report regarding the request by the SB Multifamily Fund 11 Limited partnership to receive preliminary approval for a 67 BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 224 -3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI May 2, 1990 FAX SMISSION Mr. Geoff Olson Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Truth- in -Hogg Code Enforncement Dear Mr. Olson: sFAX (612) 223-8019 This is in reference to our previous telephone conversations with respect to code enforcement. It is the duty and obligation of Maplewood officials to assure that all buildings and structures within the City comply with City Code. If a City Official is informed of a code violation, it is the duty and obligation of that official to investigate and insure compliance. Sincerely yours, BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. Patrick J. Kelly PJK,-ks C: Michael McGuire, City Manager F' U; 3 No 68 Attachment 13 AGENDA ITEM I -- 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Action by Counoil:1 City Manager Assistant City Engineer Irish Condor, West Storm Sewer, Project 86- 01-- Schedule Assessment Hearing May 22, 1990 Introduction End,orsed,. Modifie Rej eoted. Date An assessment roll for this project is herewith presented. A resolution to schedule an assessment hearing is attached. Background The financing set for this project at the time it was ordered was based on unit assessment rates. These rates do not result in recovery sufficient to fund the project costs. General obligation funding is to be utilized to supplement the special assessment recovery. Since special assessments are only partially financing the project, it is possible that the assessment procedures can be done concurrently with the detailed design and bidding. This would cut the lead time to construction by two months. It is desirable to have earlier construction in view of the on going erosion of the ravine to Johnson pond and the private property flooding potential. During preparation of the detailed assessment roll it was found that an error had been made in the feasibility report regarding the total assessment recovery. The actual assessment recovery at the adopted rates is $133,685.60, as shown on the attached project summary. An estimated assessment recovery of $163,954 was reported in the feasibility report. The reduced assessment recovery would increase the city's general obligation financial participation from $12,046 to $42,314.40. Recommendation It is recommended that an assessment hearing be scheduled for June 25, 1990, at 7 p.m. BAI jC Attachments RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have received bids for the improvement. of Condor, West Storm Sewer, City Project 86-- 010 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED.BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lots, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they -shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed .assessment notify the council thereof. v1 RESOLUTION ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at.the direction of the council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of , l Condor, West Storm Sewer,. City. Proj ect 8 6--01, and the said assessment is on .file in the office of the city clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 25th day - of.June, 19.90, at the city hall at 7. p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected .by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 20 The .city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3 The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. PAGE 1 OF 1 SEC- 12— T- 28— R- 22- Q.Q -21 ITEM STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT SEC- 12— T- 28'R- 22 —QQ -23 ITEM D/P NO. 6041 05 -18 -1990 PROJECT N0. 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER PROJECT SUMMARY 96 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT * * * * * * ** *0.000 UNIT AT * *$500.000 EA. = * * ** *$0.00 ********96.000 UNIT AT * *$231. 100 EA. = * *$22, 185.6 0 146 PARCELS ASSESSED QUANTITY PER RATE ASSESSMENT STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT *******146.000 UNIT AT. **$500-m 000 EA. = **$73p 000.00 STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT * * * * * * ** *0.000 UNIT AT * *$231.100 EA. = * * * * ** *$0.00 SEC- 12— T- 28 —R -22- 410 -24 65 PARCELS ASSESSED TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = ITEM ---------- _ ___w- QUANTITY - _--- __- ww -- -- PER -- -- _ RATE -_--_- ASSESSMENT ----- -- -- ---r STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT * * * * * ** *65.000 UNIT AT * *$500.000 EA. = * *$32,500.00 STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT * * * * * * * * *0. 000 UNIT AT * *$231.100 EA. = * * * * ** *$0.00 SEC- 12— T- 28— R- 22 —QQ -31 12 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM QUANTITY PER STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT GRAND TOTALS 319 PARCELS ASSESSED ITEM - QUANTITY - w - - STORM - - - - - - - SEWER - - - - - - - - - - BASIC UNIT - * * * * ** *223.000 STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED FOR THIS PROJECT = RATE ASSESSMENT UNIT AT * *$500. 0 @O EA. = * * *$6, 000. 00 UNIT AT **$231.100 EA. = PER RATE ASSESSMENT UNIT AT * * $500.000 EA. = * $111, 500. 00 UNIT AT **$231,s 100 EA. * * $22, 185.60 **$133t685.60 PROJECT NO, 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER D/P NO. 6041 QUANTITY CHECK{ LIST COL. 1) = STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT - UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT -- UNIT PIN NO, COL 1 12-28- 22 -21- -0005 0.00 12- 28- 22- 21 - @006 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0007 0.00 ..12-28-22-21-0008 0.00 .12-28-22-21-0009 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0010 0000 12`28- 22--21 -0011 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0012 0000 12 -28 -22.21 -0013 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0014 0600 ...12-28-22-21-0015 0.00 12- 280!--22 -21-0016 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0017 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0018 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0019 0, 00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0020 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0021 0000 12-28-22-21-0022 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0023 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0024 10.00 12-- 28- 22 -21- -0025 00,+00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0026 0600 12.28-22-21-0027 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0028 0000 12- 28- -22 -21 -0029 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0030 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0031 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0032 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0033 0.00 1.2-28 -22 -21 -0034 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0035 04,00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0036 0.00 i2- 28 -22 -21 -003? 04,00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0038 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0039 0400 12728 - 22 -21 -0040 06* 00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0041 0000 12- .28 -22 -21 -0042 01600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0043 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0044 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0045 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0046 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0047 0. 00 . 12. 28 -22 -21 -0048 0000 12-- 28 -22 -21 -0049 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0050 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0051 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0052 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0053 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0054 0.00 12-28-22-21-0055 0100 12. 26 -22 -21 -0056 12- 28 -22 -21 -0057 0100 PAGE 1 OF 7 05 -18 -1990 COL 2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 0@ 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. @@ 1. @0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1600 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PROJECT NO, 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER D1P NO. 6041 QUANTITY CHECK{ LIST . COL. 1) = STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT -- UNIT , COL. 2) = STORM.SEWER CONDO UNIT - UNIT PIN NO, COL 1 12- 28 - 22 -21 -0058 0.00 12- -28 -22 -21 -0059 0.600 12 - 28 - 22 -21- 0060 0800 12- 28 -22 -21 -0061 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0062 0600 12- 28 - 22 -21 -0063 0600 12 -21 -0064 0600 .12 0600 12 -28 -22 -21 -0066 0. 00 12- 2 8 - - -0067 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0068 12- 28 -22 -21 -0069 0000 12 -28- 22 -21 -0070 0. 00 1.2- 28 -22 -21 -0071 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0072 0100 12- 28 -22 -21 -0073 01600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0074 0.600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0075 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0076 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0077 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0078 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0079 0600 12-28-22 -21 -0080 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0061 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0082 0.00 12- 28- 22 -2.1 -0083 0600 121-28 -22 -21 -0084 0600 12--28 -22 -21 -0085 0000 12- 28- 2 2 -21- -0086 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0087 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0088 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0089 0000 12- 28- -22 -21 -0090 0600 12- 28 -22 -21 -0091 0600 .12- 2.8 -22 -21 -0092 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0093 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0094 0000 12- 28 -22 -21 -0095 0.00 12- 28- 22 -.21 -0096 0.00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0097 0.00 .12-28-22-21-0098- 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -21 -0099 0800 12.28-22-21-0100 0600 .12-28-22-23-0057 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0058 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0059 1000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0060 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0061 1600 12.28-22-23-0062 1000 12- 26 -22 -23 -0063 1.00 12~-28-22 -23 -0064 1100 12.- 28- 22 -23- -00.65 1.00 12_28 -22 -23 -0066 1100 PAGE 2 OF 7 05 -18 -1990 COL 2 1600 1000. 1000 1.000 1000 10 00 00 1600 is 00 00 1000 00 .1-600 11600 1100 1400 1100 Is 00 1600 1000 1000 11600 1600 1600 00 1: /, r, 1000 14, 1400 1000 16 00 1000 1000 116 1000 1000 10 00 10 00 1000 1000 1600 1000 1600 0000 0 r, 00 0 r, rr r, 0 r, r, /, /, /, r, r, r, r, r, r, /, rKUJ h:t;'r NU• 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER PAGE 3 OF 7 D/P NO• 6041 05 - 18 -199@ QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) - STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT - UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT - UNIT PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 12 - 28 -22 -23 -0067 11600 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0068 1. 00 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -@069 1.00 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0070 1.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0071 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0072 1.00 00 00 12-28 -22 -23 -0073 1.00 0 @@ 12- 28- 22- 23 -00 ?4 1.00 0 . @0 12- 28 - 22 - 23 - 0075 1. 00 @• @0 12 28 -22 -23 -0076 1.00 06 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0077 1400 0. 00 12- 28- -22 -23 -0078 1. 00 0000 12- 28- -22 -23 -0079 11600 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -008@ 1.00 0, 00 12- 28- 22"23 -0081 1.00 0. @@ 12- 28 -22 -23 -0@82 1.00 0000 12--28 -22 -23 -0083 1.00 0000 12- 28 - 22 - 23 -0084 1.00 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0085 1.00 060 12- 28 -22 -23 -0@86 1600 0• @ �/[ V 12- 28 -22 -23 -008' 1.00 @. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0088 1.00 06 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0089 1.00 0. 0 12-28 -22 -23 -0090 1400 @, 12- 28 -22 -23 -0091 1.00 0 • 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0092 1000 0 • 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0093 1.00 0.0 12- 28 -22 -23 -0094 1.00 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0095 1100 0600 12-28 - 22" -'0096 1600 000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0097 1.00 06 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0098 1.00 040 0 12- 28 -22 -23 -0099 1.00 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0100 1.00 0. 0@ 12 28 -22 -23 -0101 1.00 0600 0 12- 28 -22 -23 -0102 1000 @• 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0103 1000 0* 00 @ 12- 28 -22 -23 -0104 1.00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0105 1.00 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0106 1000 0600 .12- 28 -22 -23 -0107 i 00 0.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0108 • 1.00 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0109 1.00 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0110 1.00 0. 00 12--28 -22 -23 -0111 1.00 0.00 12 -28- 22--23 -0112 1100 0• @0 12- 28 -22 -23 -0113 1.00 @• @@ 12- 28 -22 -23 -0114 1600 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0115 1.00 0 . @0 12- 28 -22 -23 -0116 1600 �0 (/`/�� V . V 0 12 28 -22 -23 -0117 1.00 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0118 1.00 0 . 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0119 1000 0, 00 0600 PROJECT HO. 66--01 CONDOR STORM SEWER D/P N*O 6041 QUANTITY . CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT - UNIT COL. 2a - STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT - UNIT P IN HO. COL 1 12- 28 -22 -23 -0120 .14100 12-- 28 -22 - -- 0121 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0122 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0123 1.00 12- 2 8 -22 -23 -0124 1400 12 -26 -22 23 -0125 I s @V 12-- 28 -22 -23 -0126 1.00 12- 28- -22 -23 -0127 1 12 -28 22--23 -0128 1600 .12.28-22-23-0129 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0130 1000 12 -28- 22--23 -0131 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0132 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0133 1000 12-28 -22 -23 -0134 .1400 127-28 -22 -23 -0135 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0136 1600 12 28 -22 -23 -0137 1600 12 1600 12--28 -22 -23 --0139 11000 12- 28- 22•-23 -0140 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0141 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0142 1.0@ 12- 28 -22 -23 - 0143 1600 12 28 -22 -23 -0144 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0145 1600 12- 28- 1.22 -23 -0146 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0147 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0148 1000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0149 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0150 1.00 12-- 28- 22--23 -0151 1400 12- 28 -22 -23 -0152 1.00 12- .28 -22 -23 -0153 11000 .12- 28 -22 -23 -0154 1000 12- 26 -22 -23 -0155 1600 12- 28-22 -23 -0156 1000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0157 1400 12-- 28 -22 -23 -0158 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0159 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0160 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0161 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0162 1. @@ 12- 28 -22 -23 -0163 1100 12- 28.22 -23 -0164 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0165 1600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0166 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0167 1. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0168 1100 12- 28 -22 -23 -0169 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0170 1.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0171 1000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0172 1.00 PAGE 4 OF 7 05 -18 -1990 COL 2 0000 @. 00 0. 00 0 * f / • V V 0. 00 . 01600 0. 00 0600 0.00 0600 . 0100 0600 . 0100 01800 0000 01600 0000 0. 00 0000 0000 0400 01600 0,600 0600 0000 0400 0000 0. 00 0600 0000 0000 0. 00 0000 0000 0600 0. 00 0000 0600 0000 0. 00 @. @0 @. @0 0.100 0000 0600 0000 @. 0@ @. 00 0600 0000 @. @@ FRUJ ECT NO. 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER D/P NO. 6041 QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 13 = STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT.-- UNIT FIN NO. COL 1 PAGE S OF 7 05 -18 -1990 COL 2 12-28 22 -23 -0173 1.00 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0174 1.00 06 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0175 1000 0000 12..- 28-- 22 --23-0176 1.00 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0177 1.00 0.00 12 28 -22 -23 -0178 1600 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0179 1000 0600 12- 28- 2.2 -23 -0180 1.00 0000 12- 2.8 -22 -23 70181 1.00 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0182 1600 0000 12- 2 8 -2 -23 -0183 1000 0. 00 12-- 28 -22 -23 -0184 1100 0000 12- 28- 22- 23--0185 1600 0000 12- 28- .22 -23 -0186 1100 0.00 12 28 -22 -23 -0187 1600 0000 12 26 -22 -23 -0188 1600 0400 12- 28 -22 -23 -0189 1600 0.00 12- 26 -22 -23 -0190 1900 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0191 1600 0.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0192 1000 0000 .12- 28 -22 -23 -0193 1600 0600 12- 28 -22 -23 -0194 1600 00 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0195 1000 0.00 12--28 -22 -23 -0196 1000 0.00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0197 16.00 0600 12-28.22-23-0198 1100 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0199 1000 0000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0200 1100 00 00 12- 28 -22 -23 -0201 1000 12- 28 -22 -23 -0202 1600 0.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0002 1.00 0000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0003 1.00 0000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0004 1.00 0600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0005 1400 0000 12 28 -22 -24 -0006 1600 0600 12-28-22-24-0007 1400 01,00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0008 1.00 0600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0009 1600 0000 12- -28 -22 -24 -0010 116.00 0600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0011 1.00 0600 12-28- 2.2 -24 -0012 1100 0.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0013 1000 0400 12-28-22-24-0014 1100 0000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0015 1000 0000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0016 1000 0.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0017 1100 0600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0018 1000 0.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0019 1600 0600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0027 1000 0.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0028 1000 0.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0029 1000 0. 00 12 -28- 22724 -0030 1100 0. 00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0031 1000 0.00 PRUJE(;T HO, 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER D/P NO. 6041 QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT - UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT - UNIT PIN Nth. COL 1 12- 28 -22 -24 -0032 1800 12- 28 -22 -24 -0033 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0034 1.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0035 12,00 12- 28- 22 -24- -0036 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0037 1.00 12-- 28 -22 -24 -0038 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0039 .1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0044 1.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0045 1100 12- 28 -22 -24 -0046 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0047 1.00 12- -28 -22 -24 -0048 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0049 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0050 1100 12- 28 -22 -24 -0051 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0052 1.0@ 12- 28 -22 -24 -0053 1600 12-28-22-24,0054 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0055 1.00 12- 28 -22 -24 -0056 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0057 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0058 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0059 1600 .12- 28 -22 -24 -0060 1600 12- 28- 22 -.24 -0061 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0062 1000 12-. 28 -22 -24 -0063 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0064 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0065 1600 12- 28- 22.24- 0066 .1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0067 1000 12- 28 -22 -24 -0068 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0069 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0070 1100 12- 28 -22 -24 -0071 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0072 1100 12 -28- 22--24 -0073 1600 12- 28 -22 -24 -0074 1600 12- 28- 22- 24 -0075 12- 28 -22 -24 -0076 i.0@ 12- 28 -22 -24 -0077 1600 12- 28 -22 -31 -0004 1000 12 -28- 22--31 -00 05 1000 1.2- 28 -22 -31 -0006 1000 12- 28 -22 -31 -0007 igloo 12- 28 -22 -31 -0008 1600 12- 28 -22 -31 -0009 1000 12- 28 -22 -31 -0011 1.00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0012 1600 12- 28 -22 -31 -0013 1. 00 12- 28 -22 -31 -0014 1000 12- 28 -22 -31 -0015 1100 PAGE 6 OF 7 05 -18 -199@ COL 2 0600 0600 0600 0600 0000 01600 0. 00 01600 0. 00 0000 0000 0100 0000 0. 00 0600 0600 0800 0600 0600 0600 0000 0. 00 0800 01600 0400 0600 0. 00 0. 00 0100 0. 00 0000 0.00 0600 0.000 0100 0600 0400 0000 0000 0600 0100 0100 01600 0000 0100 01600 0100 0100 0. 00 0800 0000 0.600 Yt�UJ;GT NO 86 -01 CONDOR STORM SEWER PAGE 7 OF 7 05 -18 -1590 D/P N0. 6041 QUANTITY CHECK LIST COL. 1) = STORM SEWER BASIC UNIT - UNIT COL. 2) = STORM SEWER CONDO UNIT — UNIT PIN NO. COL 1 COL 2 Y 12- -28-22- -01- 0033 1. @0 � @. 00 d s CRAW) TOTALS 223s00 96&00 1 AGENDA ITEM'" AGENDA REPORT Action by Coun013.:1 Endorsed......... TO: City Manager . Modifse FROM : A Rejected. ssistant City Engineer Date SUBJECT: Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to Co ' County Road D , Project 8812.. Schedule Public Hearing DATE: May 21, 1990 Introduction The subject project was reviousl • p y ordered.. However, state aid review raised questions regarding he duplication ' ortat' e future g of transportation ion needs served by the extension of Count Road D from its current alignment' to y g Beam Avenue on the west side Of T.H. 610 These questions could not be resolved lved within the year after the public hearing approval. it is re new public hearing e quested that a g scheduled to renew the approval of the project.. Background Negotiations are in ro ress with • p g th state aid. It is anticipated that a• de street as proposed settlement to allow state aid funding . foot-wide of the 3 6- previously ordered can be reached by the time of the requested public hearing. No other a ' p rticulars of the project are recommended for change, Recommendation It is recommended that the attached ached resolution which schedules a June , 25,.1990, public hearing be adopted* Co • feaslbllit re p pies of the original y port for reference will be transmitted separately, p ely, BAI jc Attachment RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and. directed to: prepare a repor ' p p p rt with .reference to the improvement of Beam Avenue, T . H .. 61 to Co unty Road D C Project 8 by construction of 3.6 foot -wide _storm sewer, sidewal t ...utilities, , k, and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city en ineer has • rep ort for t g prepared the re p he improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY .COUNCIL MINNESO OUNCIL OF. TA as follows: lows 1. The report of the city engineer advising his osed improvemen g council that the pro . p p nt on Beam Avenue, T.H. 61 to Count Road D, City Project 88 - 12 b constru - y •� � y tion of 3 6 foot - .wide stree utilities, storm sewer, sidewalk and appurtenances feasible and should a pp tenances is ld best be made as i proposed, s h.ereb received, d. 2. The counc will consider the .aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of b property .for all or a improvement benefited portion of the cost of the according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated to improvement of $954,0000 tot cost of .the 3• A public hearing will beheld in the co.unci hall at 1 chambers of the city 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 25th day of June, 1990, at 7:10 p.m, to consider s ' said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and ub • an p lashed notice of said hearing d improvement as required by law. _r "' ^� MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE DATE Mayor and City Council City Manager COMMUNITY CENTER'ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 21, 1990 ,Action by CounoilV Endorsed.. Modified Rej ecte r - Date At the March 12, 1990, meeting, the City Council authorized the City Manager to proceed with a 5 step plan of action for the proposed Community Center. The five items were: I. Negotiate options on the proposed sites. 2. Get soil tests /opinion on proposed sites. 3. Develop gu i del i nes for committee to further identify and refine needs. 4. Gather information to estimate operating costs. 5. Start process of selecting architect to help plan space analysis. (This step is-to be started after steps 1 - 4 have been approved.) STEP 1 Staff has met with the property owners of both parcels, and they are open to discussions regarding the sale of their property to the City. Additional discussions with them are planned regarding purchase options. gp p STEP 2 Written permission was obtained from both property owners to allow a soils analysis. The reports (Subsurface Investigation and Environmental Audit were submitted by the engineering firm last week. In summary, the Environmental Audit found no environmentally hazardous problems with the two p arcels, The Subsurface Investigation noted that some specific areas of northerly parcel were composed of deeper organic soils which would have to be considered in the design and layout of the proposed building. STEP 3 The subject of this report is Step 3: establishing a community center advisor committee to identify needs and components of the proposed center. There are a multitude of uses that could be housed in this building, and a group is needed to act as the City Council's advisor. The approaches are presented for your review. The first method is to establish a steering committee composed of nine members. Each member would represent one of the following major user groups: 1. Senior Citizens 2. Teens 3. Theater COMMUNITY CENTER A Ma DVISORY COMMITTEE y 21, 1990 Page Two 4 • Swimming 5 • Arts /Crafts 6 • Other Recreational etc.) Areas (basketball ' Volleyball, fitness Other members would be: City Manager Parks and Recreation Board Member Director Of Parks and Recreation Each steering committee b g �ttee member would e composed of interested residents chair their own sub • and /or oten committee which would p teal users. The second method of establishing residents who w ishing an advisor co mm i ttee is to appoint ould act as an ob'ec ,y ommi • x conduct a special Public J t�ve review board. i si hearing at wh i This s committee w ould seniors, etc.} would ch .potential us commit be invited-to make user groups (theater, tee. Followin the a formal presentat' recommendation public presentatio 10 n /request to the on to the City Council ns' the committee woul the community as m The six app d develop a teen mu ch as possible and pp nted residents would etc, would obably include reflect e a senior citizen, Both options would Option 2 i create an effective working s recommended bec k�n9 advisory commi purpose. The 1 ause it creates a co ttee. obbying efforts of coh esive group with problems. in reaching each committee member a g a final recommendatio er �n Option 1 • n. Recruiting efforts for notice e in the newspaper governmental channel. on the committee submi telep number, � p area and background. However, unified may create i volunteer participati and a wr' pon would include a �tten notice on c published The notices able Tv channel 64 would ask that an on the a letter to City y e interested in servi of inte rest 1 with their name n g Brest, and brief summ of the address, ei r qual i ficat ° ions After a committee i selected, calendar its member to gather information s would establish a on from user g long -term meeti p the uses considerin budgetary g psi review the information, formal recommendatio g and space at�on, n ion to the City Coun factors, and p rese nt se, cil of the uses and p nt a each u se. allocation for MAM: kas &P A 'N� n MetroEast Development Partnership 27 April 1990 Mr. Michael McGuire City of Maplewood. 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mike: Action by Council: Endorsed„, Modified_„ Rejected..... Date The MEDP is nearing the end of its third ear. During that ' t h Y g time the Partnership's programs and membership have steadily grown. At the outset we intended the effort to be one a building. °f marketing and ima g g goals were addressed through the development fair the Metro East News, and advertising and ' g the development of award winning marketing materials These efforts have succeeded in ivin the Metro East e with regard g g t area an aggressive image g to business development. As the Partnership grew, so did our ro ams. Today we h • p � Y have established relationships with brokers and developers through formal call programs and informal c recognized source � contacts. We have become a reco g e of business assistance through our Red Fla am. W have worked closely with several of our members communities g p ro � e be s communities in their efforts to attract developments. While the Partnership is entering, its fourth ear it is still r • Y � r elatively young when compared with si milar organizations around the United States. We have re is planning r Gently completed a strate g p g p ogram that will be our map for the next three ears. The PHH F Management Commute Y antus Company and the Mana g e have adopted a plan that will focus on Business Retention, Entreprenuerial Development and Information M • require additional financial Management. This program will and staff resources amounting to a budget of people. An Executive Summary of the a roximatel $400,000 by 1993 and the addition of three staff pp y plan is enclosed. The Management Committee is asking he members to continue renewi ' • g tinue to support the Partnersh by $2500.00 annually. y g your initial pledge for a fourth year. Your initial three year pledge .Since there h Y p g was far Y as been no increase in dues for three years, we are also asking that you consider increasing your led e b ten percent. months the Man • p g . Y . p cent• • Over the next several implement this program by January of 1991. The ma Management Committee will be soliciting the additional resources to fully y majority of the new funds will be raised from new corporate memberships and foundations. Existing sting members will be asked to increase their dues in 1991 on a case by case basis. 600 North Central Tower 445 Minnesota Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 612/224 -EAST Telex: 74016 4 53 SPAC UC Fax. 612/297 - 6879 We recogni that you may need more would welcome the o information before considering this issue. We feel that is necess PP °��tY to meet you to discuss our r confirm �'� Pjease call Tim Rogers to schedule an on more detail. you Yolu' renewal by signin the enclosed invoice and re membership. Ppointment, otherwise please turn it with your check for Thank you for your past suppo and favorable consideratio Sincerely, n of this request. k ichard edell, Co -chair Mayor, City of Shoreview seph R. gman HT Co - chair esident American National Bank .,6 , otioli by C ouncil: Endorse MEMOR.ANDUM j e . „ To : City Manager Re ote FROM. Thomas Ekstrand Assoc' SUBJECT: 1925 Arcade St. ' late Planner APPLICANT Philip J. Moris DATE: May 21, 1990 INTRODUCTION Mr. Moris is requesting • auto --re air q g that the City Council allow him P• e garage at 1925 Arcade Street. M to open an ...to put him on the Council agenda r- Moris asked Staff g, ng Ordinance on this a because an auto - repair garage i by the Zon g g s no longer allowed Ci ty rezoned the property t property- The The NC zone d oes p y ° NC, neighborhood commercial in es not allow auto- repair ara es. 19850 auto- repair garage was allowed to .garages. The previous use. A non-conf continue as a non conformin g use is a use that, was legal before g rezoned the property, but is not le g re -the City. gal under the new zoning c it y informing use to continue as l Code allows anon -c g Y discantinued. for one ong it is not year or more. The auto- repair ara e w � g as discontinued for more than a year because of a fire in January o .Y f 1989. Mr. Moris has been working .since .July 25, 1989. T g on .getting a building permit The City Attorney has advised us Mr. Moris would have had that d to get a building permit within re to maintain the non-conforming one -Year of the fire feels that the City should allow use status. Mr. Moris on e whim to open his business because g getting a building e he is working - g permit and that City Staff did not let him know of the one -year requirement . (Refer to Mr. Moris-'s lette on a a copy.. of the Cit p ge 6 .) Staff, however, did send Mr. y Code on non conformin uses Moris (See the letter on page 8 , g on August 21, 1989. BACKGROUND Code Recrui nt Section 36-17 (c) states that '� . d b a nonconforming building wholly or partially destroyed y fire, explosion flood, Conde d or other phenomenon, or legally tuned, may be reconstructed and. nonconforming use; provided that used for the same reconstruction shall be commenced .bullding was de ed within one -year from the date the building destroyed or condemned and shall without interruption ", be carried on Past Actions March_ 11, 1985: Council re • zoned this property from BC Commercial to NC. , B usiness January 25, 1989: Fire damaged • g d the building. July 25, 1989: Mr. Moris applied for a build permit to reconstruct and repair the building, A ugust 21, 1989: S • Staff info Mr. • his property as an _ repair Mores th he may only use allowed. Staff also garage, A towin code.. This c mazled a cop oft "nonconforming business is not ode stated that r he use" one year of the. fire to keep must be g , thin se keep a Illegal nonco gin w November 14 status. 14 and 15, 1989: Mr. . • ' Brian �Dob1e, Mr. en inspected • the fire damage and Mores structural repairs. Mr. Dobie su recommend A r of suggested that recons extensive . Ap r i l ° MaY 19 to the letter . (Refe not begin until March 5 199 r °n pages 11 and 12. ' 0: .Staff inform ) had not started w' informed Mr. Mores that since re within one - year of t reconstruct" i s no longer he f i p Mr. Nloz- ' may now only an auto -re air garage under the land use is nl P pages 13 and requirements of the y use the propert 14.) NC district (Ref e Y r to DISCussioN e purpose . The o f . Th the non- conformin pr eserve a , g use section of Cit Co occurs •Pr °Peru' Owner s rl hts Y de is while providin for g to a property when to This was the reason g the eventual phasing a rezoning had sever n for. rezoning th P ng out of the use. al calls from surr i s property In 198.5. to Mr. Mores running unding propert ow Staff has ng a towing bushes Y Hers who are o ose s. PP d Sta ff had Sent • non --conf Mr. Mores a co o f • � arming uses last PY the City s re la ' or understand th August. Apparentl g. u Lions on requiremen He h Y he did not read the is far a bu h difficulty meeting as also had to review the Plans permit. When he g the p s in November did get an engineer il sprin the wait unt Engineer `� r g to start construct, advised Mr. Mores t letters from the b ion- Re o wilding ins ecto C fer to the attached P r and structural e hed In order to be fair engineer.) the non-con to Mr. • Mores witho ut defeating th use SeCtion p of give Mr. Mores 60 ° the Code /'the P days to start con he Council should current zoning struction or comply with the R ECOMMENDATION Grant a 60- t extension on en i nee . ti • g r , advl s him that the basi, s that Mr. , this sprin t he should not st Mores s g' I f Mr• Mores is not art. construction u • must comi�ly with the under c ons t ru un current zonin ctz °n by then, he g• TEMaRIS Attachments 1. La nd use Ma 2. Property 3• Letter Line /Zoning Ma ter from phili M • P 4• Letter to Ph i P oreS dated May 8 5 • Memo 1 iP, Morls from Ci 19 from the Buildin tY dated August 21 g Official 1989 2 6. Letter from the structural engineer. al 70 Letter from Duane Grace with plan review 8. Letter to Philip Moris from City ate 9 . Permitted .uses of t • Y d March 5 , 19.9.0 he NC district 3 r� t C f � 1�l�■e'�II r� W IM NEI • / z M ' • W A I mo. ... ftw!j 2 PW s � ` j . 2 4w 9 Ad tere e r arteriD 4 • LAND USE MAP Parkside �--\ N va. �6 �•-.mot xa 8 O N X4.03 N �' � ott ,�: � � o `r � �/ t C byea V ' V .E . M 1. 09a.a 40 14o • 7R tt4.` r , 1p 60 1 141, �x c 19"55AAC. „ 4 �') + �°, 150 1 C'�) of 5 4 . 60 4 O 16 Co ISO LLJ (00 r 4 94 .� o LO 7-1 7 >.g 13 12 1 , I 1,47,0 0 60 L 60 c � ROSELAWN AVENUE -- 54.17 66 „ 5 G t ,il , J - 1 9, b 1 7 �. I, , I I _L.. , - -- got s o I _ i97 r - > 4 ._ 1 .4,15 16.�,�15�19za z1 I z g s o •, , 1 p I t 50 „ „. � IS 6 BELLWoOD I AVE@ O 121.00 121.00 66 _ moo i �,� 7 C o •�► r dam. � �"" "' r•_..v "', .,-- , . r � , r Ld f4 _.Worm.. APARTMENTS (o CIO Z 3 I r PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 Q N Philip J. Moris 2305 Barclay Street Maplewood, MN 55109 May 8, 199 Maplewood City Council 1830 E. County Road B. Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Council Members f I am going to try to bring a matter to our attention that Y h t must be handled. immediately if possible. The problem is the recent rezoning of the property located at 1925 Arcade.' This i. property was zoned H4 at the time I purchased it in Jul 1989. H4 zoning llowed y g use a s an aut o- repair shop , which i a .what this property had been used for from the 1930's until it burned in ' April 19890 r I: purchased this property in hopes of reco P Y P ntru c ti ng the +. building and fulfilling a life long dream of mine to own and operate-my own auto repair shop. Now, after followin all the city nstruction » following 'all y s, going through all the proper channels" hiring all the "right" people to do the work I have had m permit for reconstruction y ucti on stalled long enough for the director of Z Devel.opement to rezone the property out from under me without any notice at all _ when their department has been aware of m intentions from the ver y sta rt. Y Before beginning thy. s ro a ct I went P � , to the city for instructions on how to apply for the ro er ermits. At � P P the application counter I was told that I could draw u m plans for. reconstru P Y P - ction myself' or hire someone and submit them to . the city structural. Engineer for approval. Pp I hired Steve veator, a professional from Shaw Lumber, to draw u m lans and we submitted P Y P , them with all the necessary data to the city f } the building rmi g P ts. My permit was denied because Steve Veator was not a Certified Structural Engineer licensed in the state of Minnesota. I was not told by the city that these q ualifications w : q w ere required. I was told by Mr. Grace, the City of Maplewood- Engineer, that rn .plans were re ected g ' Y t coley because they did not have the stamp of an -engineer on them. ' Mr. Grace gave me the names of three - engineers who would draw my plans up "right" . at five times the Trice Steve had charged me, So, I started over. I met with recommended engineer g neer - Brian Dobie, and the City of Maplewood building inspector g P Nick Carver at the bui lding sight in October 1989, Mr. Dobie agreed a g that re pair and remodeling is needed to bring the building ack u to ,city code. He also a g p greed to draw up the plans and submit them to the city of Maplewood for approval, 6 Attachment 3 w It has been months since that meeting with the building.. inspector and Mr. Brian Dobie, (the man I was told to hire by the City of Maplewood) and I have yet to eee the plans. I have called this man, visited his office,.. left messages that are not returned, I have even called him at his home and have gotten no response. This is the Engineer that Mr. Grace told me was the "right" man to hire for the fob. In April 1990, I received a letter from the City of Maplewood stating that the property at 1925 Arcade had been rezoned, making it impossible for me to open my business. I was' given no prier notice of the citys intention to rezone my property, nothing. They said it had been one year since the fire and my time was up. I am now asking that the zoning of my property be changed back to H4 as it was when I bought the property. My wife and. I have spend a great deal. of our money to start this small business and we feel we have dealt with fairness for everyone concerned. We signed a paper with the city agreeing not to have more than one truck on the. property at any time. We spoke with the residents surrounding the property and met with no objections to our proposed reconstruction. We have hired the "right" people at above cost and had numerous conversations With the city to let them know that we are anxious to get started and are willing o g be very f l exabl e in the operation of this business . All we ask is that we be dealt with the same fairness and flexability that we have tried to show. We have tried to work within the city guidelines and do as we were told. We must know soon if this business we want is going to open or if we should try to salvage what is left of our investment. All we ask is what we paid for; the opportunity to serve and have a small business in,the city of Maplewood. Your immediate response would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at (612) 770 -1608. Thank you for your time, Sincerely, Mr. Philip J. Moris PJM pf cc: Mayor Norman Anderson Office of the Attorney General 7 CITY OF MA.PLE. WO OD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 4 v Ys y , i OFFICE OF COMMUNITY 'DEVELOPMENT �- 6 August 21, 1989 Mr. Philip Moris 2305 Barclay Street Maplewood, MN 55109 1925 ARCADE STREET — ALLOWED USES This is to confirm our telephone conversation sation on August_ 18, 1989, concerning . the allowed, u of the garage at 1925 Arcade Street. The nonconforming use ordinance states that after a fire, a building can be reconstructed for. ,, g ucted and used the "same nonconforming use... The previous business was a repair garage and did not include a towing service. P g ce. Al though a repair r .garage may have a tow truck for the business, the previous use did not. If you wish to appeal this decision, ou may y re quest that the City Council make an interpretation as to whether staff is too strict in their ' e r ruling. The City Council would then decide i our towing service y g could be allowed as being the same use of the b u i l d i n g as before the fire. .Within two weeks of the date of this letter, please do one of the following: 1. Cease use of the ro ert as a tow' ' P P y towing operation, or 24 Submit a letter to this officer inter— requesting the City Council' i pretati on of the ordinance, stating why your business should be considered the same use of the property before the buildin burned 9 . Please call me you.have an q uestions, y q stions. THOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER ji Enclosure: Nonconforming use ordinance Sec. 36 -17 (c) 8 Attachment 4 536-17 MAPLEWOOD CODE same or more restrictive na as the original nonconformin use. Whenever a nonconformin use of a buildin or land has been chan to a use of a more restrictive classification or to a conform- in use, such use shall n ot thereafter be chan to a use of a less restricted class' ics (c) A nonconformin buildin wholl or. partiall destro b fire, explosion, flood or other phenomenon, or le condemned, I o ma be reconstructed . and used for the,. nonconfo use; provided that, buildin reconstruction shall be commenced within one y ear from the date the buildin was destro or. condemned and shall be carried on without interruption. (d) If a nonconformin use of a buildin or land is voluntaril abandoned and ceases for a continuous period of one y ear or more, subse use of such building or land shall be in conformit with the provisions of this chapter. (e) No existin buildin or premises devoted to .a use not permit- ted in the district in which such buildin or premises is located shall be enlar reconstructed or structurall altered, unless: (1) Re b law* or g overnment order; or (2) There would not be a si affect, as determined b the cit throu a special use permit, on the development of the parcel as zoned. (f) The cit council ma permit, throu the issuance of a special use permit, as provided in article III of this chapter, the extension of a nonconformin use throu those parts of a buildin which were manifestl desi or arran for such use prior to the date when such use of such buildin became nonconformin if no struc aural alteration, except those re b law, are made. ( No nonconformin use shall be extended to displace a con- formin use. (h) An accessor buildin which is caused to be nonconformin due to an amendment to.the zonin code, ma be expanded if the followin conditions are met: (1) The buildin is zoned properl (2) The buildin was a conformin structure prior to the effec- tive date of Ordinance No. 488 (June 12, 1980). Supp. No. 4. 2210 F] 0 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM:. SUBJECT: DATE: Dire ctor of Community Deve lopment Building Of f icial �• ' 1925 Arcade Street May 14, 1990 RE.: 'REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPAIR STRUCTURE DAMAGED BY .3 FIRE PERMITTING BUILDING TO BE USED FOR THE SAME .f .f NONCONFORMING USE EXISTING PRIOR TO THE FIRE. Mr. Moris made appl ication for a ermit Jul. 25 1989. � p y The plans rendered were reviewed and plan review comments issued on Aug 8,. 1989 informing Mr. Moris that this plan required a design q g by a .registered architect /engineer. At a later date Mr. Moris..called the Building In g pection Department. Mr. Grace, code consultant,.happened to be in the office at that time and discussed the design problems with Mr. Moris. Names of some registered professiona engineers were suggested to Mr. Moris. October 24, 1989, Nick Carver, building in ector, Brian g p Doby, structural engineer, and Mr. Moris met at the site to observe the condition of the building. November 14.and 15, 1989, Mr. Brian Dob structura engineer, gineer, states,he met with Mr. Moris and advised him that nearly ull roof replacement joist and attic Y replacement would be necessary.. Mr. Doby informed Mr. Moris this was not a good ' roect to be p � starting in the winter as the roof, when opened up, cause problems with a structural � ural floor slab by introducing water onto and under a slab. The slab would probably perform for a of years and then re couple require replacement, p q p meet, as the. slab is partially supported by timbers, etc. The advice from the engineer was intelligent and sound. nd. Unfortunately, apparently neither. Mr. Dob nor Mr.. M oris ris were aware of the time frame allowed by code to permit the continuation of the nonconforming se in property g p p y zo ned NC, The attached documents from Mr.. Brian Dob rofe y, p ssional engineer, along with the plan review comments and letter from Mr. .Duane Grace, code consultant, are self explanator Y- Due to the extensive repairs required under moderate we atter conditions for this structure, the Building In s p ection Dep artment g p p nt would consider this extension of time a reasonable request. kd .Attachments 10 Attachment 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Cover letter 2. Letter from Mr. Moris to City Council 30 Plan review comments from. code.consultant Duane Grace 4. Letter addressing Mr. Moris' comments on the lan review iew and recommendation of an engineer. 5. Letter to Mr. Moris from Associate Planner Ekstrand notifying him of expiration of permission for nonconformin g use. 60 Letter to associate planner Tom Ekstrand from Mr. Brian Doby, professional engineer. 7. Letter to Building Official from Mr. Brian Do by, bY, professional engineer, addressing the condition of the building, recommendations, a schedule for restoration ration and verification of the initiation of a report for corrections required. 11 R � � � � � � tom. N, C Cit of Maplewood Attn: Mr. Thomas Ekstrand Associate Planner 1830 East Count Road B Maplewood, Minnesota- 55109 Subj: Structure 1925 Arcade Street Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Ekstrand: Mr. Philip Moris,, the owner of the abov e propert forwarded a cop of y our March 5., 1990, letter to me re the above buildin In y our 'letter, y ou indic since the reconstruction of this buildin did not com -ence within one y ear of a fire whic h severel dama the structure in Januar 1989, the propert could no lon be used as an automobile repair g ara g e,, I am sendin this letter as a f ollow -up,to our telephone conversation the other da I explained to y ou the circumstances surroundin this restoration project it is m understandin that a fire occurred in the Arcade street buildin on or about Januar 25, 1989. In about Jul of that y ear, Mr. Moris purchased * the propert with the intention of continuin that same t Of business and conferred with the cit re restoration. He then contracted with a commercial lumber compan which prepared a set of drawin for the restoration. I believe that those drawin were submitted with a buildin permit application in about mid Au 1989- Your buildin inspection department essentiall rejected the set. of submitted plans with comments and r 9 ts. At that point, • Mr. Moris e havin d w as evidentl difficult locatin an en who could investi the fire dama and tell him what had to be repaired or ..replaced. I believe y our office g ave him m name at some point in time between Au and November, On November 14 and 15, 1989, 1 met with Mr. Moris and investi the buildin Your office was, in m opinion, correct in suspectin that there was extensive dama from the • fire. I advised Mr. Moris that nearl full roof replacement and attic joist replacement would be necessar In addition,. I told him that substantial block repair and some replacement would be necessar At that time, I told him that thi• s was not a g ood project to be startin in the Winter. He a with me. • We scheduled the restoration plans and a small outline specification for completion this Winter, PROJECT CONSULTATION FAILURE FORENSIC ENGINEERING 203 LITTLE CANADA ROAD, SUITE 280 • ST PAUL, IVIN 55117 612-4190-9266 12 Fax 612- 490 -9265 Att. 6 April 6, 1994 City of Maplewood I Page Two The most opportune time for actual start-up f the roof removal val and masonry work would be late April or May, 1990. It is simply not advisable to initiate the extensive repair of this t when s pal- type now or rain is most likely to occur. Along with typical major problems coincident with the removal of a roofs stem during the Winter or S rin Y g p g this structure has an added mayor problem in that the existing structural concrete floor system does have precarious. support which would be seriously jeopardized by moisture infiltration. I told Mr.. Moris that he will have to replace this floor system within 24 months of the fire ire repair work, even if he manages to protect it at this time. Adding that slab replacement work to his fire repair activity at this time would, however, financial. bury him. Unfortunately, neither Mr. Moris nor I was aware of our'one year Y y after fire' sunset on non- conforming . ' use permits. Also unfortunately your � office did not inform him of that in the August plan review comments. However, by mid November, when I made the initial site investigation, the weather precluded the required work until this Spring anyway. I am requesting that you either consider the restoration of the structure to have commenced with my November work, allowing for a normal Winter work interruption, or that you acknowledge the difficulties of roceedin g p g with this type of reconstruction. This appears -to me to be a reasonable request for the peculiar circumstances of this structure. My investigation report and accompanying drawings should be.completed within about ten days. Thank you. Respectfully, Professional Engineering Consultants, Inc. ti Brian R, bie, P.E. President BRD /fm cc: Mr. Philip Moris 13 DUANE C . GRACE & ASSOC, Building Codes Consultants 4126 Rice Street Vadnais Heights, MN. . 551.26 612/490 -0142 May 11, 1990 Mayor Norm Anderson • Maplewood City Council Ms . Marge Ostrom - Building Official, I have.just received a FAX transmission, courtse of Ms. Ost ' Y om, with a letter addressed to the City. Council from Mr Philip . Mori Street an p s of 2 305 Barclay d dated May 8 of this year. I would like to offer you. a few comments from my memory bank. I can make no comment whatever about the rez ' oning question, as I really have no knowledge of this part of this roblem at all, 11. I did do the first review for the re ' construction of this building. My records show that I did this re view on-Aug 8 1989. Co ► (Copy of this review is attached.) This was delivered to Ms. Ost ' toms office either that same day or the next. My records do not reflect the exact date of delivery. As can be seen from the review letter I . tan ► did require that the plans be signed by a registered professional A /E. But as can also be picked up from this review letter, that wa ► s not the only reason that a permit was not issued b inspection Y Y our p on department at that time. Nor was this review intended to cover all possible items from the plans presented, I only over items of which d sometimes ed those code designers sometl.mes are not aware. Some time later, when I was in the City Hall, Mr Morzs called and asked if I could recomend some people that he could talk to about his design problems. In as much as this was rimaril a p y structural design problem, I did suggest some various Structural Engineers ngineers that either. were doing work in., or whose business establishments were close to the City, i do not remember exactly, s saying �� Y� y ng that Mr Dobie should be the right one for him to hire. If I did it would be entirely out of character with.what I normal ' normally do In these cases. Even yet I do not know Mr Dobies office address or hone number, er , s o some of that information had to come from some other source. I am sure that the clerks in the front office do not know when the signature of a professional designer is required. A o q good many other individuals that should know these requirements q rements do not They are f ound in Minnesota Rules of the Board of Registration and ' State Statutes. I would also i d not fault the young ladies of the city staff for not knowing those requirements. That is art o job, � p f mY to know and understand the various rules and regulations to which the construction documents must adhere. 14 May 11, 1990 Page 2 of 2 pages. To.: City of Maplewood Re: Mr Philip Mori s From: Duane Co Grace Comments continued. I am also sure that.Mr Moris statement that it was oin to cost him g g more money to have the plans drawn by an engineer, than the salesman from the lumber yard is very accurate. I am sorry that such is the case, but also those rules do not allow us to use that type of consideration as a reason to make any modifications to that rule or any other of the building code rules, regulations or statutes. I doubt very much that.any of us, that.re resent the city inspection p Y p .department, told Mr Morls to hire Mr Dobie, I know that I did not. I am always willing to visit with the design eo le, or owners of an P p y project in the City of Maplewood, if I feel that I may be of an Y Y assistance*, I will offer my assistance again to this entlemen or an designer g � Y g of his choice, thru you the City Council. He should however, be led to understand, that he must still comply with the design requirements of the Statutes, Rules of the Board of Registration and Building code requirements. If I.may answer any other questions, please feel free to call u on me at any time. p Sincerely, uane C. Grace Code Consultant, enclosure. j.LTMAPM 0 5 ] 15 DUANE C. GRACE & ASS000 Building Codes Consultants 41.26 Rice Street Vadnais Heights, MN.. 55126 612/490- 0142 August 8, .1989 My-job. # 89-95 Page 1 of 2 pages. Ms. Marge Ostrom - Building Official City of Maplewood Phil Moris Re;Renovation of Service Station existing. The plans for this renovation require design by a registered professional A /E. As shown it does not comply with the Minnesota State Building Code I will attempt to point out some . of the problem areas. The Plan review comments will be from the ,19 8 7 Minnesota State Building Code, (MSBC) which in turn adopts the 1985 edition of the Uniform Building Code, (UBC) and other applicable State Statutes, rules etc., that govern the work anticipated by the plans or the preperation of the documents. Comments will be from the UBC unless otherwise noted. .Occupancy - H -4 (Repair Garage.) Constr. Type - Type V -N ( Light wood frame un- protected) This pan and does comply with code requirements. Location on * Pr. operty -- ? No site plan presented. We need this to determine compliance with the building code. Height. & Number of Stories - 17' and 1- story. [Will have basement and a mezzaine storage area.] Floor Area - Approx. 944 sq. ft. Occupant Load - 9 Other comments . 1.) Structure requires 2 exits.. Sec. 3320. 2.) A one -hour occupancy separation required between the office area and the repair. bay. This will require a rated door assembly between and window opening will not be allowed. 3.) Restroom will need to comply with Sec. 510(b) for floor', base and wall finish, as. well as material behind the finish material. 4.) Will also need to comply with the handicapped requirements of MSBC Sec. 1340.0300.. 5.) Rise and run of the stairs must comply with the exception to Sec, 3306(c) as a minimum. 6.) Handrails will be required. See Sec. 3306 (j) . 7 ,) Provide guardrail at floor opening complying with Sec. 17110 8.) If the basement is used for any purpose other than access to the service pit or for mechancial equipment, it shall require another exit from that level. 9.) Storage area floor needs to be designed to comply --with Chapter 23-A., for floor load. Would appear that it does, but must be verified. 16 Au 8, 1989 Ms Mar Ostrom - Cit of Maplewood Job. #89 -95 Mr Phil Moris Pa 2 of 2 pages Plan review comments continued - repair g ara g e renovation. 10.) Electrical wirin in the pit area and in the basement must be ,desi for a Class 1, Division 2, up to a point 1811 Above . the floor If twelve air chan per hour (ventilation) is not provided fo this area,,it shall be a Class I, Division 1 area for all .electrical, Note: An ventilation or exhaust fan within this area must also compl with above re Ventilation as noted above is found.in the,Mn. HVAC code in Sec. 1345.1500 Subp..9.,* 12.) The balance of the 'Station shall compl with Sub p. 10 & 11 of above section. .13o) The floor joists in a repair g ara g e are re to be desi to support a 100# per s ft. live load. I doubt that 2 x8's at 1 x-4.11 o.c. will do so. 14.) Will the existin foundation carr the added load of the masonr etc., that will be added ?? 15.) Prior to framin en truss details si b a Mn* y registered structural en will need to be presented to the Buildin Official for approval and use. An e that is to be hun from the trusses must be noted on the engineered details Presented, otherwise do not han an from trusses. 16*) Structural en to desi all lintels, and reinforcin for block walls to resist wind loadin etc. Plumber, electrician and HVAC contractor to present pla' - n"s', properl si for review and approval, prior to commencin work. If I ma answer an questions I would be g lad to do so. Duane Co Grace 17 T iitt CITY OF MAP LEWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY T .. ,5 ROAD , B AIAPLE1'��OOD, AIINNESO'I'A ,,.. 55109 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 770 - -4560 March ' 5, 1990 Mr. Philip Mori s 230 5.Barclay Street Maplewood, MN 55109 USE OF 1925 ARCADE STREET FOR AUTO REPAIR This is to notify ou that • Y at since one year has ass p ed since the auto repa garage has burned rep , it can no longer be used automobile p The property is zoned N for automobi zone does no t a C, neighborhood commercial a automobile re ai •• This Sections 36 -17�c and P it i a nonconforming use (d) of City Code st g ate .that: " (am) A nonconform ming building wholly or artia by fire, explosion flo p lly destro ed od or other phenomenon Y condemned, may be recons o legally nonconforming ructed and used for t ng use; provided that he -same ' � building. reconstruction shall be commenced within one year from the date s e the building was destroyed or condemned a interrup and sha be carried on without .�thout (d) If a non • conforming use of a build' voluntarily abandoned an building or land is d ceases for a continuous . • one year or more, subse subsequent s period of shall be in c q use of such.buildin or onformity with the provisions g land p dons of this chapter." S ince you have not begun the w, reconstruction *thin one .year of the fire or .use of the building the building and property used in compliance with it ,p y .can only be s Zoning class i ne fication, which ' ighborhood commercial, is NC I have enclosed a co ' requirements. PY of the NC 18 &jual q)portunity Eni )loy Attachm t a c h m e n � cr t $ Mr. Philip Moris March 5, 1990 Page 2 Please call me at 770 --4563 if you have ' any questions. THOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER . a Enc. - NC district regulations cc. Nick Carver, Maplewood Building Inspector 19 20 Attachment 9 1 • ' ; ' 1 36 -126 MAPLEWOOD CODE ' ' DIVISION 5.. NC NEIGHBORHOOD CG 5 hZMERCIAL, ' DISTRICT • : Sec. 36 -126, Intent. The latent of this district is to preserve land for the use of • . businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential j land • : ' r uses. `Uses are limited to offices and smaller retail. uses that cater •' .' .' • '. ' to convenience shopping Pedestrian and bicycle access are to be • , . emphasized. (Ord. No. 539, § 1, 4- 11.83) �: .. Sec. 36 -1276 Permitted uses ' • •' ' • Any of the following uses provided , p ed than the floor area of all buildings in g an one NC Y • : . .. ; z one shall not exceed three thousand (3,000) square feet: . - . ...: ' Bakery (1 ) kery or candy shop for the roducti • P on of .goods sold on • - '•� the premises. f' .. •4 • . (2) Beauty l . y paror or barbershop. P ' (3) Dry cleaner or laundromat. All odors must be controlled so ` . as not to be noticeable to adjacent ' dJ eilt res ' (4) Office or medical and den tai clinics. � i (5) Repair shop, except for m • P motorized vehicles. No work shall be performed outside of the building. g . (F) Drug, hardware or oce store. �' ry ore. (7) Studio. f (8) Tailor or dressmaker shop. (9) Veterinary or grooming clinic where • there are no outside kennels or storage. •• • •� (10) Video tape rental s. (11) Printing shop. (Ord. No. _ • 11 83, Ord. No. 582, § 11 85) •• • . Sec. 36 -128. Accessory u y ee8, • - [Accessory uses within a ' . (A n NC Neighborhood Commercial Dis- trlct are as follows:] ' ' Supp. No. 3 2234 20 Attachment 9 , • •`'� j ' • ZONING 1 36-130 • f • (1) Ofd' street parking. ' • (2) Signs, in accordance with the sign ordinance. (Ord. No, • } 539 1 1 4 -1 - 83) ' • S %c:. 36 - 129. Cotiditiulllll uses (requires council ul)I)ruval). Any of the following uses, provided that the floor area of all • ' buildings in any one NC Zone shall not exceed eight thousand t • •• • (8,000) square feet: •.. (1) Any permitted use listed in section 36 -127. •. (2) Club, lodge or hall. ••'• • (3) Private school, daycare center or community service use. ' (4) Taxi stand or bus stop. • (5) Restaurant, where there are no drive -up order windows or ' •.: • - '. , serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking /r odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adja- ' cent residents. • 1 (6) Other uses where the city ouncil finds that s y the. use e ` ,.. be compatible with the neighborhood and the intent of this • division. (Ord. No. 539, § 1, 4- 11-83; Ord. No. 582,'§ 2, . • 3- 11 -82) ... Sec. 36-130. District standards. (a) Bike racks. Bike racks shall be provided in an area that is . convenient to each major building entrance, but which will not • - �' disrupt pedestrian or vehicular traffic or fire lames. , (b) Building design, Buildings in this district shall be designed . to be compatible % %Pith their surrounding land uses. If more than .. one use on a site, they shall be planned and organized as a unit. Pedestrians should be able to «•alk between stores without cross- • ' • ; ing vehicular traffic lanes. There shall be no exterior storage, ,. ' other than a trash receptacle which shall be screened as required .•� • by section 36.25 of the zoning code. ' (c) Lot coverage. At least fifteen (15) percent of the site shall be .. - landscaped. • Supp. No. 7 2 235 t 21 F __ / TO- FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: OWNER: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: INTRODUCTION Action by Co oily Endorsee MEMORANDUM Rej eCted,.,�.. City Manager Date . Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Tax - exempt Financing- Multiple Dwellings and Housin Bond Plan g g Amendment Londin Lane 12 -28) SB Multifam Fund 11 Limited Partnership A. E. Johnson Maplewood Rental Townhouses May 18, 1990 The applicant is requesting preliminary approval of a $10.5 million tax - exempt mortgage revenue bond program to construct a 176 -unit apartment development. To approve this financing the City Council must also adopt a housing p rog ra m. o p g po g am. City's housing bond plan is necessary'to include this financing, BACKGROUND December 12, 1988: The City Council approved a conditional use permit for this planned unit development (PUD). The PUD included a retail center at the corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Roads. April 10, 1990: The Community Design Review Board exterior and s' g approved the building site plans for this project. April 24, 1990: The Community Des Review Y g Board approved the building colors and landscape plans for this ro'ect. .P 7 May 8, 1990: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority rec ommended app rove f Y ommended that the Council a pp e this financing. DISCUSSION This project consists of 22 buildings and a community center /storm unit -mix y / orm proposed and monthly rents are as follows: shelter. The 1. 28 one - bedroom units at $600 /month. 2. 16 one - bedroom handicapped units at $600 /month. 3. 94 two - bedroom units at $700 /month. 4. 38 three - bedroom units at $825 /month. The target population would be singles, couples, small families and empty nesters. As proposed, construction is set to begin in August of 1990 with completion proposed for Dec g P P ember of 1991. The City is not putting any money up for this ro'ect. Nor would the City's full faith and credit back k these bonds. The City has approved this same financin g This proposal meet � s requirements four other apartment projects. s the City equirements for p ts. financing tax- exempt RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution • and housing program to: Grant preliminary approval of 10 • revenue fnancin for • 5 million in tax exempt mortgage g t he 176 - unit Maplewood Rental s development, on the basis ownhouses s that: a. The proposed develo meet is ' Comprehensive p consistent with the Plan. b• Qualified marketing cons ultants ltants have documented that: (1) The development will the vacant not have an adverse affect on t ' ' leg it y rates of any existing rental ro ' he leg of Maplewood. p J ect in (2) Until the bonds are retired, ed there is a reasonable assurance th at the project will meet the i level occupancy requirements, ncome c. The City has approved • apartment pro pp similar financing for four oth p t prof a 2 REFERENCE Site Des2E-1p0tion Site Area: 894,514 14 square feet (20*5 acr es) . Existing land use: one-single family home. Surroundin Land Uses North: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Regional g Park. West: McKnight Road and single- family homes. South: Townhouses, East: Conermara Condominiums. iniums. Past Actions 1984; r ra October 8, ' Of o be 8. The City Council granted ' Ilion in tax-exempt financing preliminary approval le p inancing for the 100-unit"' p x at Hazelwood Street a t Maple Ridge Apartment complex County Road D. January i 14, 1985: The approval 4, 5. Cty Council granted re ' $ 8 million tax -exem p liminary Ridge elderly housing pt financing for the wood Hazel Street. February 11, 1985 Council tax-exempt granted preliminar a xempt financing for the 1 Y Beaver e $10 Avenue 80 -unit Beaver Cree Y enue and Ferndale Street, k apartment complex at Iv July 22, 1985: The City • $5.5 million tax- y Council granted preliminary exempt financing for the 186-unit Silve Silvero r Rid id of apartment development at Stillwater illwater Avenue and Roads. ge Planning Land Use Plan Designation: gnation; RM, residential medium density. Permitted density; 22 persons per net acre. Proposed density: 20,6 persons per net acre. Zoning: F, Farm reside ' coedit' ntial. The City Council Tonal use permit fora la approved a planned unit development. Housing: 1• The City has adopted approval o the following re uireme f tax - exempt mortgage q nts for multiple dwellings: revenue financing f g 3 a. The development shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b. The development will not have a negative the vacancy rates of existin e impact on the City, ng multiple dwellings in C. There is reasonable assurance that the development will be able to comply with the 20 percent low -to- moderate income requirement over the life of bond issue, the d. The bond indenture agreement sha 11 require : (1) The developer to annually certify o the he City, on the anniversary date of the bonds, compliance with the federal low - to -moderate income requirement, te Irement (2) The program trustee, as app roved b the ' p y City Council, shall info Maplewood of any noncompliance trends. e. The payment of a pro ram I artici g p patron fee. 2. Federal law regarding the issuance of tax - revenue bonds for multi- - le exempt mortgage p family housing has income level i requirements. One s the occupancy f at persons w' y least 20 percent of the units by p wit Income levels of no more than 50% of the Twin City area annual adjusted household ld income. As an alternative requiremen occupancy of at least 404 of the units have to be occupied by persons with income levels of no more than 604 • area annual ad household incom of the Twin City � e. These requirements are for the life of the bonds . Once a erson o income - qualified, their unit P r family is counts toward the residency requirements as long as they live in the*u • h their nit• This is true even though income may rise above the ceiling. 3. The average adjusted annual household a ' income in 1989 in t ( family of four) he Twin City area was $45,000. Gross income is reduced b $750 per y P a dult and $500 per child to calculate adjusted annual income.) 4 Attachments 1. Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map = i 3. Site Plan 4. Letter dated 4-6-90 from Maxfield 5. Letter dated 4--3 - Research Group 0 90 from Nichols /Conlan Financial Co. 6• Resolution kenmemo2l 5 m r 0 b E Loner Afton I R T Londln Lane • f R' Malland = II- -- f , o r . a c Y , u � W 0 C E L 1 nw o o d Lit. Jk" 7B 0 CL C b N major a rterial major c r • O �1 E 0 C 0 U .o 0 0 VISTA HILLS LAND USE PLAN 6 R CO. WOIlX14vJ Attachment 1 4 N • ToTA t_ 18. BZcu. RESERVED FO R E', ot Battle Creek Park • ojo C"M-M '. - - M , o • ` � ♦ I ` de C. 00 0 El 0 LOW LAND E] F" . , " Mumma mE�tII�I�l�Qt�L6'�L�! ' 1 X 20 ].. 328 • 338 346 T� 9,1 350 2271 —2299 Connemara � en loll . ••- .-, • • •' ( 1 - ..... .. - - - - �••1 . 0�� 40 -10 .,�� �1cKnight•Townhomes . , r -' Z�o.et 1 73 7� tT'1 '�Gb I'I3 , T • 10UTLOT s r ' P o .366 2276 2284 Zon i n K ey MCKNf'1iT •�DwnNortE� _ �' o '�•�� �- •; • co _ _ CO = Co Office o L6C= Limited Business Commercial V '� •• ILI _ F = Farm Residential R -1= Single Family • t ` �, o w A �^ -. �`1 L7 ... ._.� * . l r��T � ��,~ 13 TWRV IL PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 Q N o i l t {� ,• i R �w 1r W o ! e l p &L �� �� U Y J c> "' z .v) � U c ~ i3 O CC +. Z 0 U. ? oc W 1 O —! U Q Ovoa 1HOINADVI 0 LU �018 w Z Q J 2 B Z O � r�•niar rawld3dOUd r' fit rr p o 0 0 �{ o RlRiA x • • p er ee iee i eeerr a�� a till 1111 gL ,- d 69 il iE 11 31 1119 l i wl i Y i i w Attachment 3 It I. f r � T- Q � 5; Z w • f i t t _� a U) AF IELD RE April 6, 1990 Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Sherman - Boosalis Maplewood Townhouses Dear Mr. Olson: AP R jl In our, analysis of the market feasibility f t • our commun y he Sherman - Boosalis townhouse project proposed for i y nity, we selected a competitive study area that includes the le • g of • Maplewood, and the adjacent communities of ak Woodbury. We identif identified a strong demand for hou O dale and in the area, as well as from people sing based on employment growth Maplewood. P P in other nearby communities desiring to move to Ma P g We do not believe the proposed project will adversely of any existing rental 'ect in t affect the vacancy rates project � the city where existing • he leg of Maplewood, the only portion of projects would be competitive with the proposed Sherman - Boo salis project. Also the Sherman o • act on - B osalis p roject w have no I mp act proposed projects in the leg of Maplewood since none are proposed. If you need any further information on our market study, please contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, MAXFIELD RESEARCH GROUP, INC. Lee A. Maxfield President LAM/ 1ak cc: Nick Boosalis Sherman - Boosalis Companies Li LJ 612 -338 -0012 620 KICKERNICK, 430 FIRST AVENUE NORTH 612 -338 -0659 FAX MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 ATTACHMENT 4 n Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the City Counc of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special zeet.in of the City Council of the of Maplewood, Minnesota, - etas duly held at the City Hall in said City n Thursday the 31st da Y y, y of May, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. The following members were present and the fol lowing were absent It Member introduced the follow resolution and Moved its adoption; RESOLUTION RECITING`A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTI FAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPKENT PROJECT GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVERE BONDS, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND APPROVING A HOUSING PROGRAM (THE MAPLEWOOD TOWNHCMES PROJECT) The nation for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded bar me�rtbe� and after fu . full thereof and upon vote hPing tAk An t hprpnn o t by following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said. resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 25" 10 Attachment 5 RESOLUTION RENTING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A XULTIwFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELTMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVENt3E BONDS, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AND APPROVING A HOUSING PROGRAM ( THE MAPLEWOOD TOWNHOMES PROJECT) WHEREAS, (a) On May 14, 1990, this City Council of the C.i .y of M pl wvvd , M,i ajie8uta. (the "City") , adopted a preliminary resolution (the "Earlier Preliminar Resolution") with respect to a Project (as described therein) proposed by SS Multifamily Fund 11 L1 mited Partnership, a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Developer").: (b) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the 'Act) confers upon cities, the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multiw- family housing developments within the boundaries of the city; (c) The City has received from the Developer a proposal that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter desoribed, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series) (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the Act; (d) The City desires to facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportuni encourage for residents of the City; encoura a the development of housing facilities dcGignod for occupancy by low ~to - moderate income persons; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; (e) The Developer is currently engaged in the business of real estate development, The Project to be financed by the Sands is the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 894,514 square foot multi. - family rental housing development of approxi- 25" 11 mately 176 town houses located at the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road, in the C*t of y Maplewood and consists of the construction and ev i pp 3 nor of b u i l d i n g s thereon which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to �aGi �ii� v l u w - Lu -L«d =i ate ijjc;o�46 witill jj tlsle aoyitilulli (f) The city has been advised by representatives of the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is avai lable only on a l imited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowing costs, the Proj is economically more f (g) A publ hearing on the Project was held on May 31, 1990, after notice was published and materials mad available for public inspection at the City Hall and as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469 -P IS4 f Subdivision 4, of the Act, at which public hearing all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and wr ' tten comments were a6c epted ; a (h) No public official of the City has either a direct Qr indireQt financial interest in the Proj nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci of t,te City of Mapiewood Minnesota, as roilows: 1. This Council hereby finds that no information presented at the hearing or since the adoption of the Earlier Prel iminary Resolution has caused it to reject the Project or doubt the fi ndings made in the Earlier Preliminary Resolution, The findings in the Earlier Prel iminary Resolution and the preliminary approvals granted therein are ratified and co n f irmed . � in full, 2• The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, desoribed above, and the program of financing therefor, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4620 , consisting istin of the acquisition and construction of multx� family rental housing facil ities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the city and 25" 12 the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from tuna t0 time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in the principal and interest on the Bonds in the total principal amount of approximately - $10 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition afid construction of the P roject* and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the Developer. therein to be mortgaged to the purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder (s) of the Bonds; and the City, acting by and through the City, hereby undertakes preliminarily to issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 39 At the option of the City, the financing may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available and are pemitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be consented to by the Developer, 4. on the basis o information available to the City it appear and the City hereby finds, that the Project consti- tutes a multi - family housing development within the meaning of subdivision 6 of Section 462c. of the Act; that the availability of the financing under, the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financing will be a substantial inducement to the Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken, will be to encourage the provision of additional multi - family rental housing . opportunities to residents of low -to- moderate income of the city, and to promoto morn i.ntencivo dovolopmont and use of land within the City. 5. The Project and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenge bands, is hereby given preliminar approval by the city subject to the approval of the financing program by the City, the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA"),, and subj to final approval b � pP Y the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the Project. 6. The housing program for financing the project prepared in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 4620. is hereby approved. 7* The Developer has agreed and it is hereby' determined that any and all costs incurred by the city in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the pro) ect is carried to completion and whether or not approved by MHFA will be paid by the Developer. 2566 13 City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is sh own. (b) Contracts entered into with contractors doing work on the Project shall provide that: i� the contractor shall not discriminate in the hiring or firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, itarital status, status with regard to public assistance disability or age. (ii) the contractor shall compensate employees with wRUPS And fi nnnn i a 1 re unaraugn 45 pr9yided under the United States Code, section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.440 ( ii,i ) the contractor shall be requ to employ Minnesota, residents in at least 8 0% of the jobs created by the project; and, at least 60% of the group shall be residents of the seven - county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categ ories , shall be determined as of the date of the Prof ect f s prel im inary approval by the City Council (May 14, 1990). However, if the contractor can show that these quotas are not feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specif ski.l 1 s , the contractor may request the City Council for a release from the two residency regai.rements. The requirements shall continue for the duration of the construct project. ( iv) the contractor shall be an acti pax-ti( ipant in a state of minnesota apprentice prcgram approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. (v) All provisions of these tax - exempt finance requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the Project, (c) A written opinion, with supporting j usti f ication from a qualified expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application requesting tax - exempt xaortgage financing to document that: (i) The Project will not adversely increase the vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the City that are existing or have received prel iminary City approval over the metropolitan average. 2566 14 S. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Assoc iation, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to-the Prod ect and the financing program therefor, to consult with the City Attorney, Developer and purchasers of the Bonds (or trustee for the purchasers of the Bonds) as to the zaturities, interest - rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other pi ovisions of the, necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval. 9. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any munic funds on the Prujec;L uLliv,. L14a.L4 Uic is *venuca der ived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a ch arge, lien or encum- brance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the City except the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subjeot to any l iabil ity thereon. The holdeL car Ll Bu d .-4 *hall 1•iev*r have the right to o ompo l any exercise of the taking power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property of the city, except such property as may be expressly pledged for the security of the Bonds. The Bonds shall recite in- substance that Bonds, including the interest thereon, art payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bands shall not constitute a debt o f the C ity within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 10. In anticipation of the approval by all necessary entities of the housing program and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the Profect will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is hereby authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be f inanoed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, shorte*terrm financing, � sub ect to reimbursement from the proc of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 119 The De veloper shall enter into various agreements with the City which shall impose the fallowing restrictions on the Developer and the Proj ect: . (a) Construction must begin within one year o preliminary approval on the Project (May 14, 1991) . The 2566 15 cif) There is reasonable assurance that the Project will be able to comply with the federal, county and City law -to- moderate income requirements over the 0 .life of the bond issue, (d) The bona indenture for the Bonds shall require (i) The Developer to periodically certify to the City and trustee, compliance with the federal low-to-moderate i1 come requirement. The frequency o f t certification shall be determined on a case --by -case basis. (ii) The trustee is to inform the City of noncompliance trends with federal low-to-moderate income requirements. (e) As a. condition of approving the Project, a lump -sun fee at Bond closing or an annual fee over the life of the Bond will be required. The City reserves the right to choose the fee option that will be the most beneficial to the city. This choice will be made when the final resolution for the Project and the Ponds is adopted. Factors to be taken into account will include, but not be limited to. i) The size of the Bond issue. (1 9 i) Un.budgeted city funding needs at the time of the request. (iii) The number of requests. (1*v) Federal arbitrage considerations. f) The formula for each fee option is as follows (i) Annual fee: ( Full bond maturity,* An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one - eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and Onom quarter of ono porcont of the Bond issue shall be paid at Bona closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. (2) Prepayment of Bonds ,# The same as the full. Bond maturity requirement, except if all of 16 the outstanding Bonds are prepaid prier to final Pond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump -sum fee equal to the present value of the remaining annual fee payments, from the date of prepayment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions, i i y Lump-sum fee: At Band cl os i ng, a lump -sum fee shall be paid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified a pert, acceptable to the city. (f) .20% of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusters gross income of 50 or lees of the metropolitan median income, unIess the Developer elects. to provide 40% of the pro3 eot units complying with the 60% of median income requirement; and (g) 50% of the Project units shall he Occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110% of the metropolitan median income. Adapted by the City Coumil of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. this 31st day of May, 1990. ATTEST Mayor City Clerk 2566 17 STA'G'E OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY of MAPLEWOOD 1 1 the undersigned, being the duly quaff. i fied and acting Clerk of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the sane is a full, and eozplete transcript of the minute of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes r elated to a resolution granting preliminary approval to the Maplewood Townhomes Project. a WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this � day of , 19900 City Clerk (SEAL) 2566 UK CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE PROGRAM THE MAPLE'S OO D TOWNHOME S PROJECT This program is for a multifamily rental housing develop-* ment located at the southeast corner of McKnight Read and Lower Afton Road in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. The Development (as hereinafter described) will be financed by an issue of revenue bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4620, issued by the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City") . The Development will consist of the aoc,uis.iti m on, construction and equipping of a 894,514 square foot (approxi- mately) multifamily rental housing development of approximately 176 town houses. The Development will be undertaken by SB Multifamily Fund 11 Limited Partnership. The Developer will covenant that not less than 40 percent of the dwelling units in the Development will be occupied or held for occupancy by persons or fain i 1 i e s whose income does not exceed 60 percent of the median income for the area which includes the City of Maplewood as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development or not less than 20 percent of the dwelling units in the.Development will be occupied or held for occupancy by persons or families whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the median income for the area which includes the City of Maplewood as determined by the United states Department of Housing and Urban 2151 19 Development. In order to be. qualified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.05 Subd . 2, at least 20 percent of the dwelling units shall be held for occupancy by families or individuals with adjusted grass income not in excess of 8o percent of the median family income as estimated by the United States department of housing and urban development for the nonmetropol itan county or standard metropolitan statistical. area, as the case may be. The City will require that 50 of the dwelling units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 1101 of the metropolitan medium income. The Development will be available for rental to the general public, and will be operated only as a rental housing facility for the term of the revenue bonds, ' The, City will issue revenue bonds to finance the Development in the approximate ant ount of $10 The owrner of the Development will be required, pursuant to a revenue agreement, to make payments sufficient to pay when due the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on all such revenue bonds. The revenue bands may be structured so as to take advantage of whatever means are available or necessary and are permitted by law to enhance the security for and marketability of the revenue bands. Substantially all of the net proceeds of the revenue bonds (the initial principal amount thereof, less amounts deposited in a reasonably required reserve or paid out as costs of issuance of the revenue bonds) will be used to pay the costs 2151 20 of' the Development, including any functionally related and subordinate facilities. The Development will be operated as a multifamily rental housing development within the weaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 46 2C, and as a "residential rental project" within the meaning of Section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue Code SB Multifamily Fund 11 Limited Partnership will enter into agreements requiring compliance throughout the term of the revenue bonds (or for such longer period as may be required by law) with the requirements of federal law and any requirements imposed by the City* Acquisition of the Development will be carried out in accordance with applicable land uge and development restric� tions, and construction of the Development is subject to applicable state and local building codes. The owner of the Devel opment will be required to operate the project in accordance with state and local anti -o discrimination laws and ordinances. The City has adequate existing capacity to administer, monitor and supervise the Development, although the City has reserved the right to contract with other public agencies or private parties for these purposes. The costs of the Development and the program of financing the Development, including specifically the costs of the City generally will be paid or reimbursed by the owner of the Develop meat or from the application fee paid to the City by the owner. 2151 21 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA APRIL 24, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER i Chairman Moe called the meeting to order at P.M. 2. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Present Tom Deans Absent Marvin Erickson Present Roger Anitzberger Present Michael Holder Present % .Daniel.Molin Present 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. March 27, 1990 Boardmember Anitzberge ved approval of the minutes of March 27, 1990, as s mitted. Boardmember Erickson s )6c ded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Anitzberger, Holder, Molin 4. 0! b. April 10, 1990 Boardmember Anitzberger moved approval of the minutes of April 10, 1996, as submitt Boardmember Morin seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Anitzberger, Holder, Molin APPROVAL OF AGENDA E Boardmember Holder moved approval of the agenda as submitted. Boardmember E ickson seconded Ay s- -Moe, Erickson, An'tzberger, Holder, Molin UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Landscape Plan - Maplewood Rental Townhomes, Londin Lane Nick Boosalis, developer, and Leigh Rolfshus, architect, were present at this meeting and explained the revisions in the proposed landscape plan. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes 4 -24 -90 The board members discussed whether trees should be • required to be planted along Londin Lane. Secretary Ekstrand said the staff recommendation includes a condition requiring trees along Londin Lane, since the neighboring developments along Londin Lane have provided trees. The architect said the natural pond area would stay as it now exists. The architect presented the proposed exterior colors to the Board. Grey and brown tones were proposed. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the revised landscaping plan date- stamped April 18, 1990, including the following changes: 11 All deciduous trees must be at least 2 inches, balled and burlapped. If pin oak are not used, they shall be 2 1/2 inches. 2. Landscape screening along the east and west sides between adjacent residential property. 3. Five to six deciduous trees shall be planted along Londin Lane in locations approved by staff. 4. Aluminum or vinyl siding is acceptable based on what was shown at the Board meeting on 4- 24 -90. Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Anitzberger, Holder, Molin 6. DESIGN,REVIEW a. Fence ,esign - G.A.C. Aut Body, 2210 White Bear Avenue t William end George Tait the applicants for this proposed`t%.metal- ribbed creeping fence at G.A.C. Auto Body, were present at the meeting. In response to Chairman M�oe's ques on on why the fence was not installed A the c ditions of approval required, the owner replied /tha they had not changed the requi rements bd simply not fulfilled all of the requirements °� they had not installed the cedar screening acce the fence. The board members discussed the ning classification of the adjacent properties. Adele Tait aid she thought the fence should stay the way it is t this time. F - a MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: y P Howse Moving Request LOCATION: East of 1826 Radatz Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Gary Boryczka and Robert Nicholson DATE: April 30, 1990 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Action by CO30i:L$j Endorsed.. Date The applicants are requesting approval to move a single-family gle- family house from 2839 White Bear Avenue to the lot east of 1826 Radatz Avenue. (Refer to the attached maps and photos on pages p p g 4 - 6.) The house needs to be m oved, because the lot is part of the site for an auto - service center. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Section 9 -64 requires that the City Council make the ' following findings to approve a house moving: 1. The proposed building(s is compatible with those in the neighborhood it would be moved to. A determination of compatibility may be based on comparing p g the structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age,.and style of construction to the average rage home in the neighborhood to which the house is to be moved and the health safety, welfare of the community, and 2. That all City Code requirements can be met. 3. That water runoff from the site will not cause an adverse effect on surrounding properties. 4. Public streets can be protected from damage. DISCUSSION This house meets the City's requirements fora approval. val. It is a stucco and brick one -story rambler. The house is similar in exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construction uction to many of the existing homes In the neighborhood. The lot is large enough so that the house could setback requirements meet all setba g . The main concern by the neighbors is the drainage and City Engineer inspected g soils. The p the new lot and he feels that the lot can be built on with minor grading changes. RECOMMENDATION Approve the request to move the house from 2839 white Bear Avenue to the proposed site on Radatz Avenue. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 10 The applicants must complete the following conditions before the City issues a moving permit: a. Provide $35,000 in cash or an irrevocable letter of credit to assure completion of the house to Code standards or to demolish the structure and return the site to its original condition. b. Provide evidence that the mover has a license from the State and a permit from Ramsey County. c. Signing an agreement giving the City the right to take possession of the dwelling and property 90 days after the issuance of the moving permit, if the work is not complete. This agreement would also grant the City the right to use the escrowed money to complete the construction or to demolish and remove it. The City Attorney shall.draft this agreement. d. Provide a registered land survey showing the lot lines and survey pins at the lot corners. e. Provide a soils report from a company approved by the Building Official. This report must include the legal description of the new lot, a map of the lot and all soil corrections and recommendations. 2. The following conditions apply to the moving permit: a. All rubbish, materials, extra fill, dirt, debris or leftover material shall be removed from the property within seven days after the house is removed from the lot on White Bear Avenue. b. Any excavation or basement left after the house is moved from White Bear Avenue shall be filled in within 48 hours. Any uncovered excavation or basement shall be fenced. 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 35 property owners within 350 feet of the. site. Of the nine replies, seven were in favor, one had no comment and one was opposed. Those in favor had the following comments: "It would fill in the unattractive empty lot. I think the ground there is unsuitable for building on. I would hope if the house is moved in, that they would fix up theoutside of the home. It has sort of deteriorated" (The Campbells - 1808 Radatz, Ave.) . "Has this lot been tested for water table level? If they are having a basement they better check this out. Also all the homes on Radatz Avenue from Southlawn Drive to White Bear Avenue all have well water. I do not believe city water is in the street. Better check that out with the City Engineer and let the applicants know this. I am not against this house move at all. It is 100% better than the neighbors throwing trash in an empty lot" (The Earley's - 2812 Southlawri Dr,). "it's better to have a neighbor house than the empty lot. However, my concern is that the ground must be leveled off so water would not get to my house or stay in my land. Also, the size of the house should be appropriate so it will not be too close to my house. The borderline must be well marked before construction is started" (The Les - 1826 Radatz Ave.). The Schwankes, at 1835 Radatz Avenue are opposed. There comments are: "The lot is a swamp and will have serious water problems. Therefore, in the proposal the developers must have a method to divert the water around the home. The lot currently has a river running through it that has the runoff water for the entire neighborhood. This water runs into the swamp behind the development. Assurance must be given that the developer will build a drain tile that will handle this excess water. This water problem exists even on dry years. Also, the house that will be moved is small and doesn't fit into the neighborhood." Attachments 1. Property Line /Zoning Map 2. Plot Plan 3. Photocopies 3 r 1 O.0 t 5 # ( . (.16q `r _ aOG. /VO. /67656Q 569.03 - - ` _ i �, ,� 68 O 1 _ . 29.03- - - • p/3 T. COURT (p It 47 I.r- 1 30► — i 1 It 5 r r r m f /ZC NO. 60 m t �A l ' I N . it m s' 0.0 of =MW r 1 ,• 1" s ;i N Q7 MOQ[ 7AK[N ROR SCAM AVC. 1 CT I:lLg �L•iglf0 A•t - '11 1: .� 0 v F t • 7' fool 100 100 IOQ' 100' 100' (00' • 1!O S t 11 • • - . , IFS, • •• _J � '�'ii 4S �• 10 • t n � .•• .�Gwc. _tQS .�.,� 5b s 19S , t• 1 , r...- a.rra'�e .72 arC �e. h �S 7) 0j 710 .76 AM ■ �� n/ 7.3 0 - 1 - - _ �$ 50 •• 2.2'1 «.. .e4 •c. d 60 o is . 7e ,,� ��,87. 1 M !9 �>r o0o D n "� y�65� � r �r o • so N ,4D p ri W. 5 � O p1 Z.�S t?C � b 3J til).9� .p C SO n 0 A G °' ri �. •• `. N so = -144- o (Il� (a so jjj t (3) i � ��� - s 9 c. I O l it f _!, mum 4 � +2 Los ac• .�sa.c � a '120 SO z o N _ G (2 - , 0 7 50 `0 DO �9L� s^ S o a . " - • 1795 1809 1815 1825 1835 1845;1.851 1861 1871 1879 1887 I. o s�.• %i 1905 )s � S,c 5g ac .51 ac w v sc so s ,. ( 1 .45ac. _w o .�2dc � � t 1 - 1 t�.� [. :?° (14) (o F C090� (07 I17 IOo' ►00' 10 loo' too* too' to t 100 BS l0 1 0• LSq .)I, ■ ■ p Z ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 9 0 ' 14 0 10 0 11 I57 It T �s• S6' vs 7 Ivo• 100• loo 't 0' 100 200' mum n in OWN D 0 ��,, o p 4� 34ac -Mac. .s4ict .lh*. SZ— a ac. N .446&c. AL&C• .7Q � 1UO r � � 4��c .���c .4 t6 wc. ,�, N 9; h �5 0 � 1808 1816 1826 c) 3 18401846 1850 1874 1888 1890 __ ' �► ..,, 1 ILO L - �t � � �? LJ 1� s "' 1900 (6 o2v 0 i o � , ( 1 i �- '1860 _.. Ls�� , ..,.. tsa (tU) �52� (2,� 1s,f ' K X 4 e912 �E Ro Est - �T. PRO PQSEQ� /�:AT141 130• ! 12 S I9iO •, 47� t• o r 10.94 ac. (•94 2 °) O 4 (SS4 Lod 1 `•'bn J'4 64 C ILE 160 N too loo too' too too „ 2 12.25 0 10 _ t %n 11 c 9 8 7 6 NI 5 N 1 3. I c. C •J • t ,R I w yet r / .2� ' � 1 r• 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 N 4 Attachment 1 i VE4" 0a T /'L aT FLA N 5 Attachment 2 � _ „ � 'P • ; Ali r h > ' � , ` 1` .., •+ , f r< r r "��F' <r �-• C k L9 s Ly � `� Aa `t. t ,', �"� , #'�. •��'. +� k :.y- � � 4 , 1' r � f �, , , rti? �!'-)�,'x1^F � t 7 �.� K L',I , ..- .�...,.�y�i •r �i � "(� S. 'I e• 1 � '.r •'* Y - t•� ��.`{ •''e/wt as. �,. ���ti'!5n `CI° �. � •tY + ,r' :r t^� '. f� x •3y i'` .,�' �j��; � .+.:�.k�' � :i.: �y( a a fu ���: 'l. ,tT ; �,�%�,. =:w: �">' . ;v ":. t 7� ,1 •T.. "''i 'N�`' ♦' lr.. `t".. °3 ! - 4 J•:!" 5. t ` , : ��'', 6.� .�, 1 ^ n ". �7.„ S{,� s f?i +`!' r f��y- : w •..�' A ;' �a fr �','�tt,s � ��,ei�n? . ",IStF,�, "y.� `c4'` '4WQ q. t' w'S "•f� l •F.. t $.. r. JJ �'+ 'hS'.•A•'�S �tJ�"",` I$x '.�t� ,�. •��` , _�:�� ��.- v - y� f .,�Y •�`�.:. +�,�. 3.��'' - :*: I s .'` '�� •t,R'��? kfp,�•. �^� �: '� iaF,j '�� +7e�' f)�y. .Dl'' y�`tt'r: '9'a. - ��•''�.�: Fe.� �r r':' ,i. , 's� A 'a� •� r _.+ r,a`.' :'` i:+ - '� +.r ��,;. .'.w1�,� It •}� VZ^ ;t 1, • i . y+t► ` `? `c � ♦J f � 4 ' N' 4, +f ,+ ,. •�• , � � • y"',. 4 r {. tv =� J , Y- u . �•�d t J Aw ��- .`. ti•,, .�t ,,� ,V.` ��'[ .T+f''Y` '.► .ISM i � ,t., . ►'� ,,fi�ee 3 J y n! , f r►r -.iu .� lY• ' ��r , . yt�y. .�#' � ' Sr t F . . ! M • �� `'� '* �/` T „�µ �. � . �t y. � 1. -, �yl' � t 1 1 � y':. •.r' �• � , t r t �y� - •�i g� .d �� ti.A .r , '` ,� 5 1 : j .�/� ' �1 'c �' M r;�' •?, • ire.: ;;, � ;'^�'?`" <a"C�,,. t•'Y"J` �r�.'. u.� -� �rr' � •a. #� � +'45�. ' '':C6e •�k • .� "C1�.'�4 .'Y�` •.'µ%yet•. II �i �� « k - �h s �•S�,` CAF' /- � ' �, 3 �'i �'' 'C� ,'- I M[r� ;. `�"i_ 'yt * t < � �'c'�'aZ 1: .r. r •7 - -t a x� .f !" ;.. T �' ti x � •rt:, 'q,•" .px'�` N 't.. r 4� '�;< y' �1 �' .�','�b �� i+ }r� t � tM ;a " �'� t . � ��• � r r� �1 r •OyX� i 9 1 >'Me(.� . �T - • } s Y J ',�. ��,.�•' .7' t w !'. • � � i�,. • +l t •y, t � •t',Z. � F � 1 _�','. , �: t "ilk * . r.' ,J' /o.. y" _ �'� .�� �., if • ilk' (�. �5'." Y �: 'a':t � "w • SJ . ' .Y .� 'r • J . �' ' t � i A 'P� • .�� y i4.. ,r`.•,.: �P' , >/YY ;.' M' I ` �� , 'f• , AW OW ; s. 4 �'s�i. , - r•:Pi� ', - n� '. `N t• s. ii'y'•, r��•' . a '�71 :1 .a't'. �Y' ' ltP. S . ;�j iii '•k .nY ^ F nL' ff •b 'v •�rt' tl. b •W ^ f! i k I •� �" d' tom• - •r °t. . . 7 t •},.v y s .t 'Y. -r * i • YI - :f• •l J • 'P '. i' •Zr,. T f 1 � ;•j et t� A t. � � .� f�. S2 �� ti•r;�'' y. �tJ".'�Ty� �•� �r� < • ' �i� ,r ' � t� •�. 'I� ' i .S� h t_ Ike?• 7� t. �''� ..Y , YY •J' .� • PA,N� ,'!}{��y•5.."�� P •..Y '9't' �`, "M� T {' �'1 /~ � » Y '�.` •. +�►� "!� '.. _.. ; •� et Ali.. - .� -�I � �j •.d•(j .� NX 1 ' •r. 11 4 � ' r .•' J j:�' tM O��.� " �' `•`'��. i -i ce' J �. �'•�, .. !► - �, ' ` F lab •+►-- `�/ ( ` �.:'t lam' ,f 'SI�� � '`� � �ti�' Rp'" ra!�� � - •. � l � � � / • � ' '• 1. ,,, "�' .•..� sue. ' r _*O ° ,.ti- �� �� . �� .. �".�.�'� Z' ♦ice ate .+... -� R��1►. �� . " -" , "'ti. "'^"_ - F L ��i5. •s't t'� S, 'r '�t, ;Fwd- L • .+ e - •••"..•a y a . , ; , �Y± . `� +,fig,. " '� 1 R.'� ` ,°�" .T,? '� v ».','Y^• �; T ! y - f; ,� , .,,,. Y .' � ,,�t, s; - + ' t,�•: fr�. i�7 D�� �� }f i '. �" t .wa � 3 ' - hw•. te r► ^.� .r S ., .1M }'4 ' • A. l �- I f - t� � y w•a• . ir It '•r• -� 4¢�i, . ; . i -x ' - 'ma � IM'r f �•5 ar t • t. ss l•• � • � t'a • � � t • •� �sk.. � �, v ; Y '� :/i � t ` 'a1^;Yl�:t` �� F � �, 14 rl • A 64 1 AI ` - - A rr„; �}. - • j: v.' AW �I•.'a• .a r ' , P• LLIC op... •v i• . tr: • t d •n w, I S' +c .r.. 1 15 a Tk� ws_ , a 4 ,�:' , :2M1�s'•4aC' j ..`' #; . .,, :,. '.;� '.3 -t >�i '�� � i 2 ;� r soft �, . Y t c' q� � '� • � {,1j'`� �. .X1' �,>4A ems e' _1 � • � F 1. � t •,liJ •1 t ,, ^�(�! � � ` .., ♦,. '* •.•- '� ^ rta�6 .yi' t.l+,, �M+ �.? ��� �� ti'Ii• f' � • 3n+•7�;4' a, w } � - ^}r I - •� r ��isl• fi i i Y �, t� �r • ,I� ;�M���� "�"'!!�c i � � alai ��'' µ r I .i+,��� • K + � � • �'' � � - r �'•• • t � ."• .•Ss�. -ter. �,i < ti ++' Ali ,•xr �l,wY ,''L" ./11.� � .a�.•' i� tit 1- _ ' � _ ,�L -• M • ° s •� `•► F- 3 MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: INTRODUCTION City Manager Director of Community Development Easement Vacations Gall Avenue North Suburban Company April 2, 1990 Aotion by Counoil:i Endorsed— Modified Rejected, Date The applicant has requested the vacation of four unneeded utility and drainage easements. (See the map on page 4.) BACKGROUND The developer dedicated these easements on the Maplewood Meadows Plat. The City approved the final plat on July 11, 1988. On April 5, 1989, the City approved a lot division for Lots 1 -4, Block 1 that moved the lot lines. (See the map on page 3.) The property owner granted new easements to the City. The new lot lines allow the developer to construct double dwellings on Lots 1 and 2. The Old easements restrict the buildable area of Lots 2 and 3. STANDARD FOR APPROVAL Chapter 412.851 of State law allows the City Council to vacate any public easement if the vacation is in the public interest. RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution on page 5 that vacates four public utility and drainage easements on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 of Maplewood ' Mead owse Approval is in the public interest because: 10 The City does not need the easements for current or proposed utilities or drainage facilities. 29 The property owner dedicated new easements. GO /memo7.mem Attachments: 10 Location Map 2. Property Line 3, Site Map 4. Resolution 0 0 Z I v is 3 NN AV LAKE BLVD IR � J SILVER LAKE ) � I2 ( E ) LOCATION MAP North of Galt Avenue 2 Attachment 1 Q N Q WHITE BEAR LAKE 68 ( i) BRENW00 7.7 W J o GAL AV . Q WO D LY N. AV O N ir J o �� E BRENNER AV d a p LYDIA FUR SS v CTS AV .a O a N }- m 19 6 o � z a Z AV J RIDGE STAND- Qc c a Q? 3 Q m N �' 0 3 � MAP E � . a i BEAM G' Q Ig Y U MAPLE VIEW AV a r -� r RADATZ AV v � o o U ss� q (! 1 e ( 2 ) PR /VAT£ STREET W KOHL MAN AV Y (WSSAB/ AV) NORTH SA /N T PAUL cr z co > RD (23) „ is 3 NN AV LAKE BLVD IR � J SILVER LAKE ) � I2 ( E ) LOCATION MAP North of Galt Avenue 2 Attachment 1 Q N .f 7t�ss•�� • 6 • �Mf e• X. Y R lb 'Iry ga „ �� i5 a • e3 -� -. 1 8 a � r+ 1 � � t� r >.r ' Joe w g Ohs• �+ 18 � o .� 1 1 8 A $ � 1 � i I R Ito M .04 L in as 7 t •> -lw/A i.�r •1 /w —%vy�A lair .tI °J GALL s s et •re T. r 1 r ?4 8 A5 a ww was — r - I 11 . • � s 1 f It's 4w �'� Iz • t w i Ira �� r a � q �61 r1• - 0 r " C r. �t t IV.s PROPERTY LINE 3 Attachment 2 Q N I�tCCN /, 4,,V k- Q Vpf� 60 #77 LO � o L_ 1 , EASEMENT TO BE VA / S SO EAST LINE OF LOT 3 EAST LINE OF LOT 2 O I � /B. S Z • 5 2.5 � 5 5 5 60. 00 yob. 00 NOTE: EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED THE WEST 5 FEET OF LOT 3 BLOCK 1 LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH 10 FEET AND LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH 10 FEET. THE EAST.5 FEET OF LOT 3 LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH 10 FEET AND LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH 10 FEET OF LOT 3. THE WEST 5 FEET OF LOT 2 LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH 10 FEET AND LYING SOUTH OF ' THE NORTH 10 FEET OF LOT 2 THE WEST 2.5 FEET OF THE EAST 5 FEET LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTH 10 FEET AND LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH 10 FEET OF SAID LOT 2. 6u Lj, : ,- 3c SITE MAP Proposed Vacation of Easements Fj L N j 4 Attachment 3 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, North Suburban Company initiated proceedings to vacate the public interest in the following - described easements: 1. The East 5 feet of Lot 3 lying North of the South 10 .feet and lying South of the North 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Maplewood Meadows. 2. The West 5 feet of Lot 2 lying North of the South 10 feet and lying South of the North 10 feet of Lot 2 Block 1, Maplewood Meadows, 3. The West 2.5 feet of the East 5 feet lying North of the South 10 feet and lying South of the North 10 feet of Lot 23, Block 1, Maplewood Meadows. 4. The West 5 feet of Lot 3, lying North of the South 10 feet and lying South of the North 10 feet. WHEREAS, the following adjacent properties are affected: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Maplewood Meadows. WHEREAS, the procedural history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the owners of property abutting said easements have signed a petition for this vacation; 2. This vacation was reviewed by the Planning Commission on April, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that this vacation be 3. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1990 to consider this vacation. Notice thereof was published and mailed pursuant to law. All persons present at this hearing were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, upon vacation of the above- described easements,, public .interest in the property will accrue to the following - described abutting properties: Lots 2 and 3,* Block 1, Maplewood Meadows NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Maplewood City Council that it is in the public interest to grant the above - described vacation on the basis that: 5 Attachment 4 10 The City does not need the easements for current or proposed utilities or drainage facilities. 2. The property owner dedicated new easements. Adopted this day of 1 1990. MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MAY 7 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2* ROLL CALL ' Commissioner Roger Anitzberger Presen CommissionerN Lester Axdahl Prese t .Commissioner ichard Barrett Present Commissioner R,bert Cardinal Present Commissioner Sue Fiola Abi Commissioner Loraine Fischer Pres Commissioner Gar Gerke :resent Commissioner Denny \ s Larson r" Absent Commissioner William Rossbach Present Commissioner Marvin Sigmundik f Present Commissioner Brian Sinn Present 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. April 2 1990 Commissioner Fischer/ oved approval of the minutes of April 2, 1990, as s bm'tted. f Commissioner Sigm conded Ayes -- Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Gerke Rossbach 1� I / Sigmundik Abstentions -- Axdahl, Anitzberger, Sinn 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner ischer moved approval o the agenda as submitted. Commission r Barrett seconded ,f Ayes - Anitzberger, Axdahl Barrett, Cardina Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach Sigmundik, Sinn 50 . NEW BUSINESS a. Easement Vacations: Gall Ave. (North Suburban Co.) Secretary Olson presented the staff report for the requested vacation of four unneeded utility and drainage easements. f Maplewood Planning Commission -2- Minutes 5 -7 -90 Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the resolution that vacates four public utility and drainage easements on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, of Maplewood Meadows. Approval is in the public interest because: 11 The City does not need the easements for current or proposed utilities or drainage facilities`. 20 The property owner dedicated new easements. Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The motion passed. b. Preliminary Plat: F1 icek Additj on Ken Rob�rts, Associate Pla Ynee. presented the staff report f r this requested n -lot single- family subdivisi n along Kohlman Commissione Anitzberger Asked staff whether this property is rt of the,8horeland area. In response Mr. Roberts sa'd this. `oposed plat property is in the shorel and area d do comply with the ordinance requirements. Commissioner Fisch asked staff whether Kohlman Lane is the City's lon s cul -de -sac. Staff responded that to his knowledge t w the longest at approximately 1800 feet. Commissioner ssbach as d staff to explain the requirements f the tree o dinance. The commissioners discussed th se requirement with staff. Bernard F1 cek, the applicant of this proposed prelimina y plat, commented on is plans for preserving trees on he property and discu sion with the commiss ' ners on this subject fo lowed . Chairm n Axdahl asked for comments from the public and one person commented on the soils in this area. /- - �1- Act ion by C ouno i l MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: PROJECT TITLE: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Preliminary Plat Kohlman Lane, south of Bernard Fl icek Flicek Addition April 30, 3990 INTRODUCTION Endorsed Modified Planner Rejecte Dat Beam Ave, ( Section 4 ) The applicant is requesting the approval of a seven -lot single- family subdivision along Kohlman Lane. DISCUSSION All of the significant trees on the site are south of Kohlman Circle. The developer plans to remove some of the high ground g g and on the north side of the plat to fill the low ground on the south side.of the plat. This will result in the loss of the trees within about 145 feet of Kohlman Lane. The filling is needed to fill in a hole in the rear yards of the future homes If the City wants to preserve more trees, they should direct the developer to submit a revised grading plan. The new p lan would. have to show less filling and may require the use of retaining walls and a drainage ditch to outlet the existing hole. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the preliminary plat subject to the developer completing the following conditions before final lat approval: p 10. Approval of final grading, drainage and erosion control plans by the City Engineer. The erosion control plan shall address the recommendations of the Soil Conservation District and the Ramsey - Washington Watershed District, 2. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize radin on the lots- so tree g g preservation is maximized The City Engineer may approve deviations from the radin p lan, if g g p the intent of the overall approved grading plan is followed. 3. Approval of a tree plan by the Director of Community Development. No grading or construction may begin until the Director approves this plan. This plan must show the trees over eight inches in diameter that the developer intends to remove or retain. The plan must also show where the developer will plant replacement trees. REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION 1. Area: 165,257 square feet (3.8 acres ) 2. Existing land use: undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North: A single - family home and undeveloped land in Little Canada. East: Single - family homes across Kohlman Lane. .South: Ramsey County open space. West: Ramsey County open space and wetland. PUBLIC WORKS Sanitary sewer is available in Kohlman Lane. Municipal water and nd storm sewer are not available to this site. go /memo9.mem Attachments: 1. Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed preliminary plat 4. Preliminary Plat (separate attachment) 6 V adna ' is He' ht ... ♦�• interch rind al arterial KIM-- p t y' +� . • gyp+ 1 CIA BW ft or R 1, •o.— . A � .� minoraf r cc l C GERVA/S fM& 0 mom J M a or i • E � . t _ r Os i -i R1 ' T _� i t-- t Tt 01 ec off - m i or arteri . .� ale • � i •r V _..�. LAND USE PLAN . I I 3 4 N Attachment 1 In i /J# LITTt E qj%NA'bK - -' . •e l z _•, 1. ac 50414 1 Sox .50414 - 200' eO 3 030 Q 33) 33 �. t'll ;A 4 b� 3 j r m M � " " 0 ; 0 9S s» N N N w 0 �. " �T _ �_ Ae .. I 100 I CIO* 100 `� Ali ra 1 �. �? 1•jfT . ir lf v. 1[ rain• �! 4•sw . 9? 2Z - — " 9 �'' • ' \ '� .,'��9, 1' R ie ` 7, 5. ►7. Z3 `• 0 d J 4W ( Z 11.5 3 orc.. �~ .s , �� -t Q4V o 1 y \ / 1 _ �, • All 030 -P I RAM SE`! COUNTY ?� o i COUNTY 417 I c OP DITGH O .�► ' 3s� POND 1 s �. A -( -1950) /� D .1-• - GOVT. `" • � O 1 1 so (3? ^/ of etc)) � N i op V g1 h I ca v 1`t f '1 , • • � o e� • '.. 4 S3 Jet . 0 -� - - - a.. 1 A t Flo Ar 1,201 ee t , �1v Z S .31 3 •I •,u J _.�• " �;.� �� ^■ ;� 1929. z - � .1� ae 3.0 A*c z (. T 2 w �, - • � '371' � . `� o 13 e t , � , 2J •.e �• t � _apt ! t ' I PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 A ttachment 2 Q N A p l BEAM VE. ens � i YV, ` fi c ! A� y �j � s •► � � : r t y >f h� O L l � � V S � � a I •' � '� 4t� ,y V � gr.L I � � 4wf • y CO v 1 -Z 9 � 4 / s : 3 c' PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 Attachment 3 4 N Maplewood Planning Commission -2- Minutes 5 --7 -90 Commissio r Fischer moved the Planni Commission recommend a roval of the resolutio that vacates four public utilit and drainage easem is on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, of Map wood Meadows. pproval is in the public interest b ause: 1. The City does no nee the easements for current or proposed utili.' or drainage facilities. 2. The property 7ch dicated new easements. Commissioner Rossb econ d Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The mot i oyf passed . b. Preliminary Plat: Flicek Addition Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report for this requested seven -lot single- family subdivision along Kohlman Lane. Commissioner Anitzberger asked staff whether this property is part of the shoreland area. In response Mr. Roberts said this proposed plat property is in the shoreland area and does comply.with the ordinance requirements Commissioner Fischer asked staff whether Kohlman Lane is the City's longest cul -de -sac. Staff responded that to his knowledge it was the longest at approximately 1800 feet. Commissioner Rossbach asked staff to explain the requirements of the tree ordinance. The commissioners discussed these requirements with staff. Bernard Flicek, the applicant of this proposed preliminary plat, commented on his plans for preserving trees on the property and discussion with the commissioners on this subject followed. Chairman Axdahl asked for comments from the public and one person commented on the soils in this area. Maplewood Planning Commission -3- Minutes 5 -7 -90 Commissioner Cardinal moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the developer completing the following conditions before final plat approval: 1. Approval of final grading, drainage and erosion control plans by the City Engineer. The erosion control plan shall address the recommendations of the Soil Conservation District and the Ramsey - Washington Watershed District. 2. The grading plan shall include a proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. Housing styles shall be illustrated which minimize grading on the lots so tree preservation is maximized. The City Engineer may approve deviations from the grading plan, if the . intent of the overall approved grading plan is followed. 3. Approval of a tree plan by the Director of Community Development. No grading or construction may begin until the Director approves this plan. This plan must show the trees over eight inches in diameter that the developer intends to remove or retain. The plan must also show where the developer will plan replacement trees. Commissioner S igmund ik seconded Commissioner Rossbach amended the motion to include: 4. Require soil borings be done on Lot 7 6, and 5 in the proposed building pad areas before final plat approval. Commissioner Anitzberger seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The vote to amend the motion passed. Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes 5 -7 -90 The Commission then voted on the motion. Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The motion passed. C. Variance end Lot Division: 1860 Sterling St,,.-i(Welch) Secretary son presented the staff report or this requested to division and lot -width vari ce to divide one lot into wo lots. The applicant N ncy Welch was present d explained her request. Bruce ck, the applicant's attorney, also spoke in favor of his requested lot division and lot - width variance. Commissioner Fischer sked for t e history of the approval of a cul -de -s c on thi property. Staff said a number of different p ans ha a been proposed, but none have been presented to t e Planning Commission or City Council for approval. taff said that by doing the first lot division, it ade later attempts to develop the property more 1 ficult. Commissioner Rossbach 7varian ed t Planning Commission recommend denial of th and lot division because: 1. The variance wo ld not be in character with the area and would reduce the pri cy of adjacent homes. 2. The propert owner has not adequ tely demonstrated a hardship o her property which as not created by her ow actions. Commissioner nitzberger seconded Ayes -- nitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Cardinal The motion passed. � -s MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development T: Variance and Lot Division. sion. LOCATION: 1860 Sterling Street APPLICANT /OWNER Nancy Welch DATE: April 30, 1990 Aot i on by C ounoi lil Endorsed o difi ed%ft � Rej ecte Date INTRODUCTION The applicant is r e questing approval of a lot division and lot q g pP width variance to divide one lot into two lots. BACKGROUND The applicant owns a 39,900 - square - foot home site (110 feet by ) 363 feet . She would like to subdivide this lot into two lots. (Please refer to the map on page 6.) Lot A would have 23,460 square f , eet of area but only 20 feet of frontage. Section 36 -39 t Code r e q uires at least 75 feet of frontage. Therefore, of city re q she needs a variance of 55 feet. The existing house would be on Lot B. It would have an area of 16,470 square feet. Nancy and John Welch owned the three lots at 1866, 1864 and 1860 Sterling Street before they divided the lots. They lived in the home at 1866 Sterling Street. In 1972, the City approved the division of 1866 Sterling Street. The staff recommendation was the s lit with the full understanding of all parties to approve p that the remaining land would be difficult to develop. (Please refer to the attached minutes on page 9.) The City approved the lot at 1864 Sterling Street in 1975. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Section 462.357 57 Subdivis ion ( 6) (2 ) of the State Statutes permits th City Council to grant a variance upon finding that: 1 Strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique har p to the property under consideration; and, 2. Granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue Hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a Un p variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonablez use if used under conditions allowed by the Zoning ordinance. The plight of the landowner must be due to 9 circumstances unique to his property, and which were not created by the landowner. Granting of the variance must not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. DISCUSSION This application does not meet all the State - mandated requirements for the granting of a variance. Granting of the variance would alter the character of the area and reduce the privacy of adjacent homes The new house would overlook the back yards of the homes to the north, west and south. The owner of the lot would have to have a long driveway built next to the lot to the north. Another finding required by State Statute is that the landowners did not create their own.problem. This is not the case here. Mr. and Mrs. Welch originally owned the land now occupied by 1860 -1866 Sterling Street. They could have developed their land with more lots by building a short cul -de -sac from Sterling Street, similar to the Knoll Circle development to the south. Instead, they chose to split off individual lots onto Sterling Street. The minutes of the first lot division in 1972 state that Staff made them aware of this problem. RECOMMENDATION Deny the variance and lot division because: 10 The variance would not be in character with the area and would reduce the privacy of adjacent homes. 2. The property owner created the problem by splitting off individual lots rather than platting the original property with a cul -de -sac off Sterling Street. If the Council decides to approve this variance, they should refer it to staff to prepare a resolution. The City should then require that the applicant widen the 20 -foot strip to 35 feet and construct the drive as far to the south as possible. 6 I CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 38 property owners within 350 feet of the site. 21 replied. Two were in favor, five had no comment and fifteen were opposed. Those opposed had the following comments: "This neighborhood was complete when we moved in 1 -1/2 years ago. If we would have known a house would be going in behind us and spoiling our view of the open space behind us, we wouldn't have p g built on this lot. Allowing a house to be built on a subdivided lot would set a precedent.for other homeowners to do the same" (The Larsons - 1848 Sterling Street). "It would have a bad image for Maplewood when unsightly lots are created, Not g ood for the wildlife, Obstructs view for some owners on Knoll Circle and Sterling" (The Telser- Gadow's - 2525 Knoll Circle)* "Putting a house on lot A would be impractical and will effect the view and value of adjacent lots. It would set a precedent" (The Greens - 2507 Knoll Circle). "The present house is messed up in its present position and would be hard to sell. Lots A and B should remain as one lot" (The Brennhofers - 2514 Knoll Circle). "It is inconsistent with other homes on the block. I am concerned about property values. We purchased our property because of the privacy and open space to the rear" (The Nyquists - 2510 Holloway Street). "It is a shoddy way to develop a neighborhood and sets a bad precedent. The Welch property has already lost value because they built their house sideways. They would do better to sell their ro ert as one lot" (The Warners - 1866 Sterling Ave.) . P p Y Refer to the attached letters from the'Wildes, Sontags, Andersons, Johnsons and Fai Hong Wong starting on page 100 go /memoll.mem Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Site Plan 4. Letter: Bruce Beck 5. 1972 Minutes 6. Letter: Wildes 7. Letter: Sontags 8. Letter: Andersons 9. Letter: Johnsons 10. Letter: Fai Hong Wong 3 I ut LOCATION MAP 1860 North Sterling Street 4 Attachment 1 4 N NOR TH SA IN l PA UL 29 ( 68 119 / 119 I ZO HOLLOWAY y J P Q O f' � y O 00 W �- 3 5 Y 121 Z -� W y } J L RIPLEY 5 A W RIPL AV C1 CLE KINGSTON AV z z a PRICE AV �° Y W z u 29 5 s m 3 v T LARPE NTEUR AV w as: J N O Q W p IDAHO AV 65 ° yam• W H Q O � Q � T pNA AV '� ( (1) CURRIE ST L M£8 RASKA AV ( MYRTLE CT 5p O (2) P 3 4 -� - �_ a RY,IN i ORS V LANA BE CT .,, Z 9 `-�.. T OAKHILL I Y I ANGELA Ic L M /CKEY 3% I AI 0 IVY -'_" _ AV M ELKHEART LA - - (t /N ,n 68 F.QY-"" i �W Z W f- T 2 13 I i i y �` - - 31 `%- 1 4 1 - �i`� HAWTHORN AV MARYLA A LOCATION MAP 1860 North Sterling Street 4 Attachment 1 4 N rM 2.32 3 TIERNEY R.J� v R.t5 ( ! L •� •� v 2 Ito � v Proposed Variance W '� • Z t at , 17 • �0 5 7 -40/ �- 6 s - 4 ( 44. 7 Proposed Lot Split Lines ' '�• S 3 , 2° 2 5 .... ..... .. Ide. M E A D 0 P W ... .:.:....:.....; A ..... ARL". ........ U p `N" �l / 0 too go rce 75 � =2 * MAPL wo D `2a3b e �Z o ^' v h iu -a �4 a a w • Cz8� 9 O4- 18 2 �t7 8 r o KNOLL 9 C t R C 3" 5 o C3S� ) C R I P LEA - , 0 2 33 6 ] -� N (39) 6 KNOLL 4 , 14 7-,o ) 2 3 1 5 (43 0 6 � �� °• �3 7� I I ' �F f -PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Variance and Lot Division Lot B and Lot A 5 Attachment 2 Q N — -- .� . 'g g cc .L R C4 (3) K F Z 7S ! . o 75 Z50 LLJ G I 1 2 3 v4 ,, ... i.23i.. t.Z3at. + 7) so Z • IZ R u, •., 5 , zoo Q —j Qu _ 8 7 0 04-0 no 6 2.32 3 TIERNEY R.J� v R.t5 ( ! L •� •� v 2 Ito � v Proposed Variance W '� • Z t at , 17 • �0 5 7 -40/ �- 6 s - 4 ( 44. 7 Proposed Lot Split Lines ' '�• S 3 , 2° 2 5 .... ..... .. Ide. M E A D 0 P W ... .:.:....:.....; A ..... ARL". ........ U p `N" �l / 0 too go rce 75 � =2 * MAPL wo D `2a3b e �Z o ^' v h iu -a �4 a a w • Cz8� 9 O4- 18 2 �t7 8 r o KNOLL 9 C t R C 3" 5 o C3S� ) C R I P LEA - , 0 2 33 6 ] -� N (39) 6 KNOLL 4 , 14 7-,o ) 2 3 1 5 (43 0 6 � �� °• �3 7� I I ' �F f -PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Variance and Lot Division Lot B and Lot A 5 Attachment 2 Q N SITE PLAN Proposed Variance and Lot Division 6 Attachment 3 4 N Proposed Variance e Nor 1 h 11 of Soul h 602 f *0 of W 1/4 of SE 1/4 =sol Ion 13 0, 22 ---• N 88° 41 ' 24 "E 363.09 - - - •• o o 330.08 M NN88° 41 ' 24 "E 183.05 -- 0 33. 0I 150.04 c O ." 0 `' %- o O W z o N . COKE. • 00 T In w �4C 9 Gory C. 4LA to O O 0 o0.lvE o • 31.2 -•. �o. + M _S _ PAT O 1 ;� "' 150. 04 O ``� 180.04 0 ' + -- 5 88 41 24 O W 363. - --" W oZ , Nor 4 h ling of W h 482 feel of W 1/4 of 1/4 •� N « I Z slow J EY W ` H Proposed Lot Split Lines SITE PLAN Proposed Variance and Lot Division 6 Attachment 3 4 N rRIAL.s A civic PPENcricE NA & ,LE ATTOVkq, RICHARD J. GALENA BRUCE L. BECK TODD STEDTFELD EXECUTIVE OFFICE CENTER SUITE 402 2785 WHITE BEAR AVENUE NORTH SAINT PAUL (MAPLEWOOD), MINNESOTA 55109 -1307 April 19, 1990 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Zoning Code Appeal our Client: Nancy Welch Dear Sir /Madam Nancy Welch currently owns a parcel of property located with dimensions of 110' x 363 Ms. Welch is 60 years herself, and is disabled. it is impossible for her entire parcel of land. A great portion of this parcel and it is Ms. Welch's desire at this time to subdivide the AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 770 -2400 FAX 770 -9033 at 1860 Sterling, old, lives by to maintain this remains unused, lot. The character of the locality is one of development and this proposed lot division would be further endorsement of that character. If the ordinance is strictly enforced, it will continue to cause undue hardship to Ms. Welch. Currently, she has to seek additional help to assist in maintainin g this property. It serves no reasonable use and she has no desire to continue maintaining it when it could have a more economic use. The character of the area supports development and she wishes for this tY ro er to fit into that character by allowing another residential p p home to be constructed upon it. As it stands, the unused property serves no purpose* Furthermore, strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause additional undue hardship to Ms. Welch and to Ray Metzal, Ray Metzal, at this time, has p urchased the proposed split property on the condition that the variance is approved* He has lived in the neighborhood for 25 years and wishes to continue doing so by residing on this proposed subdivided lot. Mr. Metzal has already sold his existing homestead. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would basically put him on the street with no place to live. He likes the neighborhood and wishes to continue residing there. The circumstances are unique to Ms. Welch in that there is no street access available to the back part of her lot. She has no choice but to construct a 20 foot wide driveway running adjacent to the northern boundary of her property. This boundary is currently marked by a row of pine trees, which will serve as a sight barrier to the driveway. This variance would be keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to have lots which d p 7 Attachment 4 April 19, 1990 City of Maplewood letter, page 2 proportion 10,000 square feet and 60 feet of lot are of large propo (i.e. C frontage)* p � The proposed lot division would yield a second lot that is 23,466 square feet, but the only means of getting to it would be that ' which would lace the lot frontage at 20 feet, it northerly driveway place would be impossible and unreasonable to have a 64 foot wide driveway. This unreasonable 60 foot driveway would run within inches of Ms. Welch 's house. It i s nec essa ry to have a means of access to this back lot, which 0 falls well within the total sq footage needed to keep with the spirit . and the Intent of the ordinance. The only feasible means of access is this proposed 20 foot driveway. Variance Application has met the two findings Ms. Welch feels that her Va pp required by state law* anticipate having any neighborhood opposition to this We do not p g proposal. Maplew in that it sal. This subdivision will benefit the City of will add another residential dwelling to the real estate property tax rolls. We req uest that the City Planning Commission and City Council approve this request. Sincerely, GALENA & BECK � 1 Bruce L. Beck MKA /BLB /dal Encl. cc: Ms. Nancy Welch 0 c. John Welch - East sid of S terling Avenue at Tierney Street. 1. Manager Miller stated the applicant proposes to create a 12,000 square foot lot out of an exi 2.05 acre tract of land. The dimensions of the proposed lot would have 80 feet of frontage and 150 feet of depth. It is the recommendation of the Staff that the lot division be approved with the full understanding. of all parties that: -� a. If Highway 212 is developed and extended through the commun- � g ity this lot and the resulting lot will more than likely be sub - ject to an undesirable noise condition whether the extension of 212 is at grade or depressed. b. That the seller of the property today who will retain ovmer- p shi to the remaining 1.8 acres of land will be imposing devel- opment difficulties to his remaining parcel as a result of an irregularly shaped parcel' of land In the easterly portion which will become difficult to develop in the future. These recognitions are advanced simply to inform all parties that they are acting on their own course of action and assuming all risks both existing and future for the development potentials of the area and that they are informed knowing full well of the potential repercussions which may result. 2. Councilman Greavu moved to approve the lot division request of fir. John We lch, Seconded by Councilman Wiegert. Ayes - all, r V. ti ' c � � 1 9 Attachment 5 \ \ At t�e /360 address, what wou�d prevenc the ourchassr of znis "lo�^ from erectzno a qaraoe w�th a mznimal set b,ck from c�e street. With no ot��r bu�ldino close co 1�^ sx'��n� cur house" the aes�het1cs of t�e area would su�fer a�onn *�tn our propertv value. �t r�js time it would aznear Lhat the inten�zon is �o use th1s "lot'` as a roadway. lt w�s ooin�e� out co �s scmeti`xs ano that a roa� could nut �e any c1oser' t�.an ton feet �o o�r prn:'.,rtv line. ls �h�s estab��s�me^� o� a ^lot a way of ge'��nq around t.ese restri�tions? l� �he C'�mmission =.`d :ouncLl see f1t to aoprove o� Lnis request co./ld it �e dcne in ano�her way. In orJ�r to assure U�at nn �uildinq would ever be erecte� �n tn1s soal] arsa could Hs. uelch simplv glve someone an easemen� to '.se �ha+ oortion of her lo� for a specific purpose? ;ew 1, * , I �e v70-2572 �es. 296-20nv Ww. t)ak&eli�vu (o & 10 Attachment 6 Hines Interests Limited Partnership May 1, 1990 Mr. Geoff Olson City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Olson. I am writing you to express my concern over the application for a variance to subdivide 1860 Sterling Street into two single family lots. Having recently purchased my home at 2519 Knoll Circle, I was very careful to select a lot location as well as the City and School District of my choice. Prior to my purchase I reviewed the areas adjacent to my lot and made the observation that these areas could not be developed under current laws and ordinances. (I have over 12 years experience in real estate management, leasing, sales and development, and I am current employed by the owner and developer of the Norwest Center and Pillsbury Center in downtown Minneapolis.) adjacent land owner, which would be fine. Prior to my purchase, I specifically examined 1860 Sterling. Although I did not get a legal opinion, it was clear to me that the appropriate frontage did not exist to construct an additional dwelling through subdivision of the lot.. It was confusing to me how that lot could be sold, except to an I believe the manner in which the house is constructed at 1860 Sterling is inconsistent with the high quality standards set forth in the City of Maplewood. Not only is the orientation of this dwelling inconsistent with neighboring dwellings but the house was built extremely close to the Southerly lot line. Under the quality standards of operation currently exemplified by the City of Maplewood, I would question whether or not this existing dwelling would be permitted, if it were built today. 640 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -1409 Area Code (612) 338 -8250 Attachmcnt 7 Mr. Olson May 1, 1990 page two In summary, it was the large lot sizes and open areas which made 2519 Knoll Circle so attractive to us. By adding dwellings in back of the dwelling, we not only lose some of the spacious feeling we enjoy, but we create a second rate development with distinct similarities to some of the older neighborhoods of St. Paul, where lots have been divided in this manner. I oppose this subdivision for the purpose of creating a second dwelling. The highest and best use of this property would be one of the following: a) not allow it to be subdivided b) subdivide and create a City owned playground C) subdivide and sell as open land to an adjacent landowner. It is clear to me that all of the houses on the North Side of Knoll Circle would sustain a significant loss in value and appreciation if a second dwelling was allowed as proposed. Thank you for your solicitation of our opinions and for your continuing' commitment to excellence in the City of Maplewood. Please call me at 338 -8250 if you wish to discuss this matter further or if you intend to grant this variance or hold a public hearing. S±rx erely, w Steph' n U! Sonitag 2519 Knoll Circle Maplewood, MN 55109 /pM 12 t CITY OF 1Vl��PL�ViVOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B 31APLEWOOD,10N ESOTA 55109 CONIIM[JNI DE VELOPM E NT ( 612 ) 77 Donald W. & Virginia Andersen Ap ril 25 1990 1886 Sterling Avenue N. ' Maplewood. MN 55109 NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY This survey is to get your opinion on an aprl.loation the City has -- - received for property in your neighborhood. The application is to divide 1860 Sterling Street into two single - family lots as shown on the attached map. This requires a variance from City Code City Code requires a lot width of 75 feet. Lot A would have only 20 feet. The applicant is Nancy Welch. I need your opinion to help me prepare a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council. Please write your opinion and comments below. Return only this cover letter (and any attachments on which you have written comments) to me in the enclosed postage -paid envelope by May 7, 1990. If you would like further information, please call me at 770 -4560 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. I will send you a notice of any public hearings on this application. Thank you for your comments. I will give them careful consideration. D� GE X IIFCLSON, AICP - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ji - Enclosures I am in favor of this proposal because I have no comment. I object to this proposal because A 1,.5, wE ,Z<<-1 D�r•o��YF� -rh1CF" Ate` s r i4 ti v r Soew X - W404 r Cpkre �d «''oS, I f you object, describe below or draw on the enclosed map any changes that would make this application acceptable. If no changes would make it acceptable, how should this property be developed? /'$7 It f 1-4 aX c E •�-7 s� *V7 E r-4 C riy , F710047 77~ `. ey7 P, /A' 2 PR.o fit. 10 (Project: Welch split) Use reverse side if more room is needed. Equal Opportunity Emplo }•cr 13 Attachment 8 �o �$ 1�E'�+-♦ s. 10 g coo I g G y �} ^ - D i g G G s �Z.L ♦ s s �' w ti 1,�., � t... 40 N � L E O � C , A=io a 7'7fit-a 'r '7G ,� -�.r p RcT�'�' F� a �..� n/ a'Y 1 ��/� a T � o �t/t 40 4r 1-5t '000 i 0 ti f r72. v G 7—%ov4.,e P— s v �� G ♦ �.��•� -- c.� i¢ Z^2 S v e't/ L o pf6 C l �g v i ' D v �4 -f/et do PTO p 3 w 14 /0000" Mr. Geoff Olson Dir of Community Development Community Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 E County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 5/1/90 Dear Mr. Olson Regarding the proposed lot split of the Welch property, I would like to go on record that I am not in favor. I feel the lot split would lower property values in the immediate area and p p ., set a precedent for poor zoning. 1 ) The lots in that area are already narrow and putting in a 20 foot "lot" frontage between the two houses is not consistent with zoning in the rest of the area. 2 ) If this frontage is approved; what will stop other people from stickin g in 20 foot lot frontages between their houses on the rest of the interior lot frontage behind the houses in that area. 3) Mrs. Welch originally had a proposal for putting in a cul de sac when she owned more property in back. Even this would have been unacceptable due to the limited space between the houses. 4). She has been able to recoup some expenses through the sale of several lots to her neighbors. 5 ) Her house is already poorly positioned on the lot; let's not make a bad situation any worse by squeezing in another house in a borderline situation already. Regards dim Johnson 1857 Sterling (11ian) C N. St Paul, Mn 55109 15 Attachment 9 F ,a i i io n g Wong 2513 Kjioll Circle Maplewood kil 55109 1.1r, G.e o.f f U l s o n City of Maplewood 183o L. Co unty std. U lIiaplewood Kil 55109 Dear Di U1 son 46 After viewing the materials from th lVel clli' s Project one Plity raise the cluestioll ftow the co lnit11lllity `•ill benefit froze it. Cle;trIy the origi llij.l int eli de;d purpose of tine lot w as to be fo j -i si favlily (1`,vell in the area, becituse your letter iiad stated the city code requirement as such k'or tt le, ilotise in tlie, application had to be irregularly 1)►jilt in tie i,A(Idle of inaiiy existing n ilovies,. reducig �rivac • for the neighbors acid the natural beauty of the privacy lallci t1lat supp r-, «ilc tll {is l esssening the U')e:lilif;ss a ear�ince tliat were tile. ma in attraction for L tlie; ;area. '1'11is 1vo►ild lead to decrez l.sllily property val for tile: surro coviwullity, an d in tu Avo off ir set arty tax gain, or even incure loss from the hiiildin of a single liouse. For the re< `sons meiltione.(i aoove,. I cit to tile, conclusion t1li.L the va riance siiotlld not be graiited for tlie k�velcti Split) projecto iio ever, in favor of otlier alternatives stic:il as se ) . 1ing the lot to neigl.)urs its opeil land, �l� d t i city or the jj.' �,t la I)e persuaded to acquire the land for the, purpose of prese.xving Arildlife. 14 16 Attachment 10 Mr. u1son May 3 1990 Page two Th,ank you for ht -tving us participate in the future develop - ment o our co:nunwity -'al(I please keel) Lis iniorm of any furtaer news in this matter. 5e,incerely F,ai 11ung " 0011cr 17 Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes 5 -7 -90 • The Commission them votes on the motion. Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, S Sinn The motion/ passed. C. Variance and Lot Division: 1.860 Sterling St. (Welch) Secretary Olson presented the staff report for this requested lot division and lot - width variance to divide one lot into two lots. The applicant Nancy Welch was present and explained her request. Bruce Beck, the applicant's attorney, also spoke in favor of this requested lot division and lot - width variance. Commissioner Fischer asked for the history of the approval of a cul -de -sac on this property. Staff said a number of different plans have been proposed, but none have been presented to the Planning Commission or City Council for approval. Staff said that by doing the first lot division, it made later attempts to develop the property more difficult. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend denial of the variance and lot division because: 1. The variance would not be in character with the area and would reduce the privacy of adjacent homes. 2. The property owner has not adequately demonstrated a hardship to her property which was not created by her own actions. Commissioner Anitzberger seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Fischer, Gerke, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Cardinal t The motion passed. F- 6 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Rejected Director of Community Development Date Code Amendment - Motor Fuel Station Ordinance May 6, 1990 Aotloil by Council V Endorsed madifie INTRODUCTION Bill Hentges, vice - president of the Hentges Company, is requesting that the City amend its motor fuel station ordinance. He is requesting that the City permit fiberglass tanks and piping. The Hentges Company represents Owens Corning Fiberglass Corporation. Mr. Hentges recommends that the City require double- walled tanks and piping if the City wants more protection against leaking tanks. He also recommends that the City require a system that detects leaks between the walls. The current ordinance permits single - walled tanks and requires in -tank monitoring equipment, as well as manual daily measurement and recording of tank levels. (Refer to Mr. Hentges letter on page 10.) BACKGROUND The City Council adopted the motor fuel station ordinance on September 11, 1989. The Hoisington Group, a planning consulting firm, prepared the current ordinance. They met with representatives of the service station industry, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Health Department, DISCUSSION The Hoisington Group recommended that the City not allow fiberglass tanks because of the danger of cracks developing during installation and later from frost heaves. They also felt that fiberglass tanks are more susceptible to damage from higher alcohol blends of gasoline. While this is not a problem now, it may be in the future. Some of their information came from the steel tank institute. Mr. Hentges has provided me with information that fiberglass tanks are as safe, if not safer than steel tanks. Many service stations use fiberglass tanks. Public agencies, such as the Post Office, the State of Minnesota and public schools, also use them. It is difficult for a non - expert, however, to sort through the conflicting evidence from the steel tank institute and the fiberglass manufacturers. I tried to get an impartial opinion by calling the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Mr. Tom Clark of that agency told me that the warranties and performance of new steel and fiberglass tanks are about equal. The installation of fiberglass tanks is more critical, especially in a high water table. Manufacturers The Pollution Control Agency does not require double - walled tanks. They feel that with the adoption of the new rules requiring monitoring for all tanks and cathodic protection for steel tanks, single- walled tanks will provide enough protection. Mr. Clark also informed me that he was not aware of any other cities in Minnesota that prohibit fiberglass tanks or rquire double- walled tanks.. Brooklyn Park requires a secondary containment system, such as an impervious liner under the tank. The State of California requires double- walled tanks. This may be due to the danger of earthquakes. Double- walled tanks are at least 1 1/2 times the cost of a single- walled tanks. Without more evidence that they would be significantly safer than single- walled tanks, I cannot recommend that the City require them now. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance on page 13, which would permit the use of underground fiberglass tanks and piping. REFERENCE ,Brian Ettesvold: Executive Director of the Minnesota Service Station Association His association does not have a position on steel versus fiberglass tanks. He personally recommends against fiberglass tanks to his members because: 1. Fiberglass tanks are more susceptible to cracks from frost heaves in the severe Minnesota climate. 2. The ground that the contractor installs the tanks on must be perfect or a sharp rock could puncture the tank as it flexes with ground changes. The Minnesota Service Station Association opposes double- walled tanks because they are not necessary and are much more expensive than single- walled tanks. The following information is from the 1989 Hoisington Group report. COMPARISON OF TANK TYPES There are four basic types of underground storage tanks: 1. Steel tanks cath.odically protected by an impressed current, sacrificial anodes or some other type of equivalent protection. 2. A noncorrosive material such as fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) or equivalent. 3. Composite tanks - steel tanks with a fiberglass coating. 4. Double- walled tanks of steel or fiberglass. STEEL TANKS STI -P3 tanks are manufactured under the specifications of the Steel Tank Institute and is the reco ynended steel tank. The tank. is protected from corrosion in three ways: Via electrical isolation (nylon bushing) that insulates the tank from piping and other attachments and prevents the corrosive currents that might result from dissimilar metals Via a protective coating - Via cathodic protection utilizing a sacrificial anode 3 Advantages: Long history (20 -30 years) of no underground leaking Cheaper to install than fiberglass tanks Impressed Current Cathodic Protection Impressed current cathodic protection introduces an electric current into the ground through a series of anodes that the contractor attaches to the tank. The tank is protected from corrosion because the electric current flowing from these anodes to the tank system is greater than the corrosive current trying to flow from it . Disadvantages: The station operator must check that the rectifier is in operation once a'month. The system is subject to vandalism; the electric service may be disconnected by accident or deliberately. Sacrificial Anodes Sacrificial anodes are pieces of metal more electrically active than the steel tank. The electric current will exit from the anodes, rather than the tank, because the anodes are more active. Thus the tank is the cathode and is protected from corrosion while the attached anode is sacrificed. Advantages: Once a year inspection by a qualified person - Does not use a power supply Disadvantages: Anodes must be monitored and replaced as they corrode. - Anodes may not be able to produce an adequate electrical current to prevent tank corrosion under certain soil conditions. FIBERGLASS TANKS Advanta Resistant to corrosion 4 Disadvantages: - Haulers must load the tank perfectly or it can develop cracks before it arrives on site. - Proper installation is important due to the chances of tank rupture caused by uneven soil loading. Many installers do not want to install fiberglass tanks because of the liability involved in installation. Alcohol blend fuels weaken the walls if fiberglass is t not coated with resin coatings; also chemicals and alcohol mix may change in the future. Shorter known history (17 years) than.cathodically protected steel tanks (20 -30 years). DOUBLE- WALLED TANKS Double- walled tanks consist of one tank nested inside another tank. There are three basic types of double- walled tanks: double- walled steel tanks, double - walled coated steel tanks and double- walled fiberglass tanks. Advantages The risk of leakage is reduced by the inner tank and by the leak detection system built between the walls. Disadvantages: Subject to the same problems described for fiberglass and steel tanks. If the cathodic protection system is not working properly, then the outside tank will also corrode. Humidity between the two walls can cause moisture build -up which creates conditions for corrosion. Very costly (up to one and one -half times as costly). LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM FOR TANKS Federal and soon -to -be adopted State regulations require that tanks are checked at least once a month to see if they are leaking. One or more of the following monthly monitoring methods must be used: Automatic tank gauging (in tank) Monitoring for vapors in the soil (outside of tank) 5 - Interstitial monitoring (in tank) Monitoring for liquids in the groundwater monitorin well outside of tank) groundwater ( monitoring Other approved methods AUTOMATIC INVENTORY SYSTEMS In -Tank Automatic Tank Gauging - Electronically checks the motor fuel level in the tank continuously, records deliveries made to the underground storage tank, and checks for leaks and other sudden losses. Interstitial Monitoring - Electronically monitors for leaks. Used in the spaces between double - walled tanks and containment facilities or vaults. Outside of Tank Vapor Monitoring - Permanently installed monitoring system a samples vapors in the soil g y gas surrounding the tanks. Leaked petroleum produces vapors that can be detected in the soil as g • Monitoring Wells - Check the ground water table near an underground storage tank for the presence of released etrole regulations P um on the water table. The re g allow manual and automatic methods for detecting petroleum in the monitoring well, - LEAK DETECTION FOR PIPES Pipes connect the underground storage tanks to disp regulations P ng islands. Federal re g for leak detection for pressurized pipes require two things: - Install an automatic line leak detector, and - Conduct an annual line tightness test or conduct monthly leak detection monitoring using one of the following methods: vapor monitoring, ground water monitoring or interstitial monitoring, detection for suction piping requires: Conduct line tightne test every three years or conduct leak detection monitoring as described for pressurized piping. You do not need to have leak detection if your suction piping meets some basic design requirements. �� REGULATORY AGENCIES The following agencies regulate underground storage tanks and other fuel station operations: I. Environmental Protection Agency (Federal) The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has written regulations for many of the nation's underground storage tank systems. One of the goals of the EPA is to make.sure each state has a regulatory program for underground storage tanks that is as strict or stricter than the Federal regulations. 2. . , Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency plans to adopt new Federal Environmental Protection Agency regulations on underground storage tanks this fall. The new regulations will require the following: - Certification that the tank and piping are installed properly according to industry codes. Protection of the tank and piping from corrosion. Equip both the tank and piping with leak detection /monitoring systems. Report to the regulatory authority at the beginning and end of the tank's system operating life. - Keep records on site that can be provided to an inspector for leak detection performance and upkeep as: 'Last year's monitoring results and the most recent tightness tests. Copies of performance claims provided by the leak detection manufacturer. Records of recent maintenance, repair and calibration of leak detection equipment. Records showing the last two inspections of the corrosion protection system. 3. Fire Marshal The National Fire Code also regulates underground storage tanks and piping installations. This code requires that all underground tanks and piping be protected from corrosion by cathodic protection or constructed of an approved corrosion- 0 7 resistant material. The Code also states that before being covered or placed in use piping p p tanks and i connected to underground tanks shall be tested for tightness in the e presence of the Fire Chief . The fire code also requires that operators maintain accurate daily inventory records. memo21. mem Attachments: 16 Letter: William Hentges 2. Ordinance ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOTOR FUEL STATION ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE USE OF UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS TANKS AND PIPING THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out).: Section 1. Section 36-151(2)(i)(13) is amended as follows: 13. All new or replacement underground fuel storage tanks shall meet the standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and shall.have a UL listing appropriate for its use. In addition, installation plans must be submitted to the State Fire Marshall's Office for approval. 1 =w QmT_r3 er a n Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon it passage and publication. Passed by the City Council on 19900 9 b E C 2 C 7 9 F P, Tie es PETROLEUM, AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE UPPER MIDWEST CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DIRECTOR OF.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.830 E. COUNTY ROAD B. MAPLEWOOD, MN, 55109 Attn: Geoff Olson 6524 Walker Street Suite 131 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Ph©ne A. C. 612 929 -1900 FAX A. C. 612 929 -0042 12/22/89 Dear Mr. Olson, I would like to thank you and Jim Embertson for taking eking the time to meet with me and discuss the new Maplewood ordinance covering motor vehicle fueling facilities. I have looked over the copy of the ordinance you provided and I would like to comment on o few of the provisions in it, Under Division 7, Sec. 36- 151(2),(1),13. "All new or re lacement underground fuel storage ta shall be S - P3 _ or an equivalent steel tank manufactured by a licen fo the Steel Tank Institute# Fiberglass tanks and piping are not permitted. I asked you for the reasoning ehind this s provision and why the prohibition of fiberglass tanks and piping. After talking with you and going through the ordinance and the reference on pages 18 thru 24, I can see that -you may have been given some mis- information b our consultants or from the Steel T y Tank Institute. I would ld like to take this opportunity to correct some of these mis- conceptions and to rebut some of the lies spread p ead by the Steel Tank Institute. Owens Corning first started to develop fiberglass tanks for underground gasoline storage in the late fifties and earl sixties at the request of several major oil companies who y knew that they would need non - corrosive tanks in the future. As early as 1968 the THE HENTGES COMPANY representing WENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP, supplied g PP fiberglass tanks to be installed in the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. B 197 By 6 OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS had ten times more tanks installed than STI -P3. In 1989 O/C TANKS manufactured it's 200,000th tank These figures only concern OWENS CORNING tanks and do not include the many tanks supplied by other U.L. fiberglass g ass tank manufacturers. O/C TANKS is still the worlds largest underground tank manufacturer* g A DIVISION OF .HENTGES ENTERPRISES, INC. 10 Attachment 1 Steel tank manufacturers would like ou Y to believe that Fiberglass tanks only account for a small percent of =th market when in reality it represents e the fastest growing segment and supplies the majority of tanks to the major a)or of 1 companies for their underground fuel storage needs, companies such as SHELL, CHEVRON, TEXACO, MOBIL,,, UNION, CONOCO require corporate squire fiberglass tanks for their cor P e owned l oc a t i ons , AMOCO , F I NA , and many large fortune 5 0 0 companies are starting to require double wall fiberglass undergro .. ca 9 and storage tanks to insure that they n meet future code requirements. The steel tank manufacturers have become ome desperate in their struggle to retain market share and have started a propaganda campaign that borders upon being libelous. Clai fiberglass tanks will melt when alcohol • is added to gasoline, when in fact there has never been a • U.L. labeled fiberglass tank failure due to alcohol. The claim Y aim a longer history when in fact OWENS CORNING had U.L. Labeled tanks installed for years before the first STi -P3 tank was installed. They claim never to of had a failure, a fie -fact many STi -P3 tanks have failed to provide the corrosion protection promised, provide no protection against i • eternal corrosion, or corrosion caused by stray electrical currents, tanks have been found leaking product and have had structural failure. Steel tank people like to over exag gerate gg ate the care that should be taken when handling fiberglass when that same is required to protect the del' care irate coating on a STi -P3 tank and the anodes and leads. STi -P3 tanks must also be protected from hold -down straps and the damage they can cause if not installed properly. STi -P3 tanks also must have their cathodic protection systems carefully maintained b qualified Y and Y q fied corrosion engineers in order t the minimum federal requirements. o meet .Most of the above information also a • ap plies. to fiberglass pipe which has become the standard in the e petroleum industry. I also would question the ' decision to rely only on in -tank monitoring systems for leak detect ion • and daily sticking of tanks. The main probl with this s ' sy stem is that the tank needs to be full whenever the leak detection ro ra 30 day P g m is run and this must be done every Ys� and the margin of error allowed would permit small leaks to occur with out detection or large amounts could be lost over er longer periods of time. Several systems ms are on the market, such as double wall 11 tanks, vapor monitoring and other systems, which provide a more reliable method of leak detection. The reason in -tank monitoring s • g Popular within the industry is because it eliminates the need to daily tick Y the tank for inventory control purposes and the system can be tied into Off-sites computers for management g purposes, not because of superior leak detection capabilities. 11 I know the intent of this ordinance was to provide the city of Maplewood and its residences ' protection from possible environmental hazards.caused by leaking underground fuel storage tanks and piping. In order to provide the best protection possible I would strongly recommend Double -Wall Fiberglass tanks which provide corrosion protection on both interior and exterior surfaces of the tank, along with containing any leaks so that the soil or water is not contaminated. Type II Steel double wall tanks with corrosion protection onall interior and exterior surfaces also will contain any leaks. Double wall piping is also available to provide the maximum amount of protection. Please look over the information I have provided regarding both fiberglass and STi -P3 tanks. I would like to have you and the council reconsider the ordinance and to amend it to allow the use of U.L. fiberglass tanks and piping and to consider double wall tanks and pipe. Also to consider alternate forms of leak detection for tanks and piping. I would be happy to make my s e l f available for any meetings and to provide any additional information you may require. Sincerely, THE HENTGES COMPANY William E. Hentges Vice - President 12 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOTOR FUEL LS TATION ORDINANCE TO PERMIT THE USE OF UNDERGROUND FIBERGLASS TANKS AND PIPING THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS (additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out Section 1, Section 36- 151(2)(1)(13) is amended as follows: 13. All new or replacement underground fuel-storage g nd or above around petroleum tanks shall meet the standards of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 116 and the rules es romul ated thereunder. Such tanks shall have .a UL l istin appr ro riatc for the use. In addition installation • , laps .shall be submitted to the State Fir e Marshal s Office for approval. Jae r • • • ' T�•f ..1 1 T /1 /� Section 2. This ordinance shall take Publication. e effect upon it passage and Passed by the City Council on 1990. 13 Attachment 2 Steel Tank Institute 728 Anthony Trail Northbrook, Illinois 60062 -2542 708 / 498 -1980 Fax 708/498-3173 May 21, 1990 ,Mr. William E. Hentges Vice President The Hentges Company 6,524 Walker Street, Suite 131 Minneapolis,. MN 55426 Dear Mr. Hentges: MY t, r I read with great interest your December 22, 1989 letter to Mr. Geoff Olson, director of community development for the city of Maplewood, Minn. I understand that this letter during the last few days has been publicly distributed to other officials in the community, who are deliberating on regulatory questions relating to underground storage systems. As such, the letter contains statements that, in my opinion, defame the Steel Tank Institute in general and could cause damage to companies doing business in the Greater Minneapolis area as members of the Institute. The underground storage tank industry has suffered in recent years from the perception that fiberglass and steel tank manufacturers continually snipe at one another. Your letter reinforces the stereotype and does nothing to elevate the debate on underground storage tank quality. You state that the letter will "rebut some of the lies spread by the Steel Tank Institute." I.hereby challenge you to present written, photographic or videotaped evidence to support your claims: -- That O/C Tanks manufactured its 2 00 , 000th tank in 1989, ,(See attached exhibit No. 1. ) -- That fiberglass- reinforced plastic tanks represent "the fastest- growing segment" of the market. (See attached exhibit No. 2.) -- That Amoco, is "starting to require double wall fiberglass underground storage tanks to insure that they can meet future code requirements." (,See attached exhibit No. 3.) 0 Mr. William E. Hentges Page 2 May 11, 1990 Particularly objectionable is the following passage: "They claim never to of had a failure, when in fact many sti- P tanks have failed to provide the corrosion protection promised, provide no protection against internal corrosion, or corrosion caused by stray electrical currents, tanks have been found.leaking product and have had structural failure." I am very interested in how you define "many sti -P • tanks. " I am equally interested in our documentation of how these e "many" tanks have failed to provide adequate protection against corrosion. (See attached Exhibit No. 4.) By making an unsubstantiated, broad -brush contention of this sort in the public arena, ou, in my opinion, may have caused irreparable harm to stl -P manufacturers. You are also wrong by claiming that "minimum federal requirements" mandate that qualified corrosion engineers .Maintain an stl -P tank. (See attached Exhibit No. 5.) Your conscious repetition of what I believe is inaccurate information gives clear indication of malicious intent. Because of the inaccuracies and misstatements cited, the m of f the Steel Tank Institute demand a retraction and apology to be circulated to local newspapers and any public officials who have received the December 22, 19 8 9 letter, Please understand: STI does not make a habit of filing suit to rectify this type of behavior. We prefer to handle matters such as this without legal action. However, we have done in the past - and will do in the future -- whatever it takes to protect our name. Therefore, a simple letter of apology and retraction gY raction from you will clean the slate. I would appreciate a response by May 31. I look forward to your reply, Sincerely, James E. Wisuri Manager of Communications enclosures cc: B. Baran, Esq., Ross & Hardies Geoff Olson, City of Maplewood e ars s �r er a wog p o ll u t io n By aA FHER)MUEGER CiWWTdn sub WdIC Concern about po='ble ground - water and soil contamination frog, I akin r ndc*r rn pd= is keeping a Bakersfield Fiberglas aorage tank manufaeturing plant busy. O/C Tanks Corporation has seen business accelerate in recent years as the public has become more aware of the dangers of leaking underground metal ta:AL% said MDre weaver, plant =mas- er. :. . "Moist of the metal tanks were hstalled An the IM and 19605 and those are being replaced now." be said. The phut w�l celebrate p:•o- duction of the company's 350,Mth Fiberglas tank Monday in a cere- mony at the plant located at 26M Pegasus Road. Though the compa- ny, a subsidiary of Owes- Corning tanks for ?S years, most of the produced by the company are production has occurred during used by.L soline Stations. he said. the past five years, Weaver said. They range in capacity from 3,b04 N. Iost of the unde ^ •rank :s :a:lons to b4-M0 gallons. V V. .. .. .� .I Aw E •��.:�� :sue t r Z •�• ..r 6 IL U L t' 1 .. R 1 •R CZ •rte G��rr�_ ra R — ..t 6;r�_ `` =v . rc e ars s �r er a wog p o ll u t io n By aA FHER)MUEGER CiWWTdn sub WdIC Concern about po='ble ground - water and soil contamination frog, I akin r ndc*r rn pd= is keeping a Bakersfield Fiberglas aorage tank manufaeturing plant busy. O/C Tanks Corporation has seen business accelerate in recent years as the public has become more aware of the dangers of leaking underground metal ta:AL% said MDre weaver, plant =mas- er. :. . "Moist of the metal tanks were hstalled An the IM and 19605 and those are being replaced now." be said. The phut w�l celebrate p:•o- duction of the company's 350,Mth Fiberglas tank Monday in a cere- mony at the plant located at 26M Pegasus Road. Though the compa- ny, a subsidiary of Owes- Corning tanks for ?S years, most of the produced by the company are production has occurred during used by.L soline Stations. he said. the past five years, Weaver said. They range in capacity from 3,b04 N. Iost of the unde ^ •rank :s :a:lons to b4-M0 gallons. V V. .. .. .� .I E E � •rte G��rr�_ �:: � ... C C - - 6. 4 c;, C - 6 or s �• ` v 3 w = — quo a... _ - ` �= Weaver moved west fr= Ow- U1 C-0 • R = = _' ` � � � a ens - Coming's Toledo, 0hio, head- VI U A•�= = =s quarters in 19N to super% se the W. the Bakers5eld plant .' . E ' _ before its opening, � ' ; _ c = ` .. ` _ _ building o For eight years pe the company had shipped, pieces of tanks from other facilities to a small Bakersfield office whet the pieces were assembled, he said. Today, the plant en. n.plot s QO people and manufactures about 3 tanks a vW for diruibu ion nest of the Rockies. After the employees autograph the 150,0%%h tank Monday, it gill be shipped to a Shell Oil retailer in the Southern Califo. rua community of Anaheim HMS. Thougb higher than s f ew years ago, production at the plant has slowed a bit since the first half of 1988 as potential c•:slo:- MI wait to see how the £n%vironxmen- tat Protedion Agency V-M enforce a new underground tank replace- Pkz%e um w rMERCLAS' I rX TyTone PoweA helps apply glass fibers and resin to a metal form in the cre26on of a Fiberglas tank at Bakersfiekfs O!C Tanks Corporation Art Tow hspects r,* intenor o; a R)etplas tank lot defects April Page 3 SPECIAL REPORT EPA Survey Reconfirms Steel Tank Marketplace Preference By Jim Wisuri Editor During the last five years, three steel underground storage tanks have been registered for every fiberglass- reinforced plastic ( FRP) model, according to an .. - updated U.S. Environmental Protection Agency survey: EPA officials for about two vears have compiled a national profile of the under- ground storage tank system population. The national profile is based upon tank registration programs in 50 states and six U.S. territories. The survey offers some questionable specific findings -for instance, a total of 105,978 steel tanks with cathodic pro - tection and 37,385 FRP tanks employing corrosion protection. (Both numbers should be considerably higher.) However, the 1990 edition illustrates some clear trends in underground storage tank usage: • By a wide margin, steel remains the preferred material for underground storage tank construction. Even in an age when protection against corrosion became an industry byword, the marketplace has readily embraced technologies that thwart the prime source of steel tank failure. The EPA survey says 222,006 steel tanks have been registered that are between 0 and 5 vears old vs. 73,916 FRP tanks for the same period. Looking at all under - ground tanks, regardless of age, nearly 10 steel tanks have been registered nationally for every FRP vessel. About 45 percent (114,523) of piping systems installed within the last five years employed galvanized steel, which is no longer accepted as adequate technology to prevent corrosion. About 17,000 piping systems were installed with cathodic protection -a four -fold leap from the previous five years. As to volume of tanks, steel outpaces FRP in the 10,000 to 29,999 gallon category by 4 to 1. In EPA's other four capacity categories, the margin is u ider. For tanks in the 110 to 1,999 gallon range, steel racks up a 25 -to -1 ad- mantage. For tanks in the 2,000 to 9,999 gallon category, steel stands with a 13 -to -1 margin. For the categories representing the largest tanks - 30,000 to 49,999 gallons and 50,000 gallons and above -- steel commands a combined 15 -to -1 advantage. Letter to the Edrtor I have a great deal of respect for Marcel Moreau, and seldom disagree with his opinions. However, I do disagree vith one point in his "The Problems with Piping -An Update" article in the February issue of Tank Talk. Under the heading of "'Unions" he stated that flex con- nectors with swivel joints e ' to the need for unions at the tank and dispenser ends of piping runs. I take exception to this conclusion at the dispenser end. The flex : connector connects to the inlet or bottom of an impact valve. This valve is designed to shear upon impact and shut off product flow, and is required by NFPA 30A. This valve is rigidly anchored to the pump island below the shear section or break point of that valve, and must be rigidly piped to the dispenser above the shear - point, according to NFPA 30A. . There must be a disconnect point in the dispenser /piping connection above the impact valve for several reasons.: One reason is simple accessib' 'ty. Another is that maintenance of the - impact valve frequently requires replacement of the shear section, - a job which would be extremely . difficult if the disconnect point were below the main body of the valve which is anchored to the island. A third problem is that installation and removal of dispensers would be very difficult with no disconnect point above the impact vslve. This would require that the valves be installed and removed as part of the dispenser. Also, the current problems with UL and flex connectors installed directly to impact valves may be another consideration unfavorable to Marcel's proposal. I certainly agree with the idea that unions am a problem, and that we should continue to seek solutions to this problem. George H. Watkins President Watkins Service Company, Inc. East Point, Ga. Figures collected by the US. Environmental Protection Agency show national tank registration figures that illuminate trends in market preferences. mber of Tanks by Age yra. 6-10 yrs. 11.15 '�i. 16-20 prs+' > 20 or Tart is 61steft1 of 0 _ : Steed :�. - _ 222,006 250,789 - ' 248,320 210,303 454,084. 1,385,502 73,916 ` : 30,354 .' 14,363 6,546 1 5,809 140,988 Concrete . • " 2,654 2,027 - 1,485 1.382 6,020 13,568 ..� Unknown 16,102 9,399 10,468 10,608 96,051 142,628 other•- .-" - = .. 7,609 3,266 2,617 2,192 - 28,123 43,807 __ Totals - f Corrosion 322,287 295,835 277,253 231,031 600,087 1,726,493 Pro�t�cbion: - _. Cathodic . Protection • 63,658 14,724 9,880 9,619 18,097 105,978 Interior Lining 12,690 7,DDS 5,434 4,618 10,764 40,511 FRP 22.756 6,462 3,021 1.2233 3,913 37.385 None 79,633 98,402 97,706 73,325 158,623 497,689 Unknown .27,860 :.• 46,484 53,793 48,673 2,314 412,124 Other -- 30.137 40,359 38.721 30,803 67,336 207,356 . Totals 226,734 213.436' 198,555 168271 494,047 1,301,043 PlonQ: . Bare Steel 22,222 30,400 29,106 26,446 67,119 175,293 GaNwilzed Steel 114,523 133,367 126,930 101,596 173,226 649,642 FRP 49,875 10,095 4,308 3,164 7,309 74,751 Cathodic Protection 17,081 3,915 .2,852 2,907 5,597 32,352 Unknown 35,557 37,831 40,241 39,315 241,683 394,627 Other 11,193 8,856 7,962 6,876 17,455 52,342 Tows 250,451 224,464 211,399 180,304 512.389 1,379,007 Letter to the Edrtor I have a great deal of respect for Marcel Moreau, and seldom disagree with his opinions. However, I do disagree vith one point in his "The Problems with Piping -An Update" article in the February issue of Tank Talk. Under the heading of "'Unions" he stated that flex con- nectors with swivel joints e ' to the need for unions at the tank and dispenser ends of piping runs. I take exception to this conclusion at the dispenser end. The flex : connector connects to the inlet or bottom of an impact valve. This valve is designed to shear upon impact and shut off product flow, and is required by NFPA 30A. This valve is rigidly anchored to the pump island below the shear section or break point of that valve, and must be rigidly piped to the dispenser above the shear - point, according to NFPA 30A. . There must be a disconnect point in the dispenser /piping connection above the impact valve for several reasons.: One reason is simple accessib' 'ty. Another is that maintenance of the - impact valve frequently requires replacement of the shear section, - a job which would be extremely . difficult if the disconnect point were below the main body of the valve which is anchored to the island. A third problem is that installation and removal of dispensers would be very difficult with no disconnect point above the impact vslve. This would require that the valves be installed and removed as part of the dispenser. Also, the current problems with UL and flex connectors installed directly to impact valves may be another consideration unfavorable to Marcel's proposal. I certainly agree with the idea that unions am a problem, and that we should continue to seek solutions to this problem. George H. Watkins President Watkins Service Company, Inc. East Point, Ga. Figures collected by the US. Environmental Protection Agency show national tank registration figures that illuminate trends in market preferences. M nInstWe Volume 4, Number 9, September 1989 SPECIAL REPORT: Tank Testing Thanks to the technological prowess of a few industrial leaders., all of America can see a day when drinking water supplies will rarely be threatened by underground storage tanks. This is most etrident when you look at tank testing — whether it's monitoring the cathodic protection on metallic under- ground system components or detecting leaks on piping and tanks. However, the technological wonders provided by systems of the '80s have limits. We are the limits. Human error caused by inadequate understanding of what a tank tightness test shouts, or u?hat a structure-to-soil potential reading means, can unravel what appears to be a seamless technology, Tank Talk this month offers several articles that address the limitations of monitoring underground systems. The articles beginning on page 1 are not meant to imply that the current state of the art is subpar. The special report merely underscores that leak detection and prevention measures are not inclined to supply tank owners and regulators with black and white answers in all cases. The gray areas are vast, which means that tank owncrs must continue to do their homework as tank testing technology evolves in the '90s. SPECIAL REPORT A Few Hints on What to Watch for After a Tank Tightness Test By Wayne Geyer Contributing Editor You are an underground storage tank owner. Your tank system was installed five years ago and meets today's corrosion control requirements. You have been keeping manual inventory control records, which seem to indicate a tight tank system. However, you have not been able to install a release detection sti ►stem. To become eligible for insurance, you want to prove your tank tight via a volumetric tightness test, formerly known in N FPA 329 as a "precision test" The test provides a result of 0.15 GPH (gallons per hour) leakage rate. Federal regulations state that equipment must be able to detect a 0.10 GPH rate at a 9576 accuracy level. The N FPA 329 recom- mended practice gives a 0.05 GPH criteria (presently under revision) to act as a minimum equipment accuracy level due to tightness testing noise. You, the owner, must opt for one of the following plans of action: • Remove and replace the tank immediately • Call the authority having jurisdiction to wan of a possible catastrophe • Sell your real estate and pretend nothing is wrong • Bury your head in the sand. Obviously, none of these plans will Continued on page 5 HOW THE MAJORS SPECIFY UNDERGROUND TANKS Company Tank Type Special Liner For FRP Exxon FRP No Unocal Dual Wall n/a Composite Steel Mobil FRP Yes Chevron Dual Wall n/a Composite Steel or FRP Yes Shell FRP Yes Occidental Dual Wall n/a Composite Steel ARCO FRP Ye s Amoco sti -P,` n/a Phillips sti -P n/a Texaco FRP No Conoco FRP No Marathon sti -P 3 6 n/a Salesmen for fiberglass -reinforced plastic tanks often claim that FRP tanks command 90 percent of the underground storage tank orders from major oil companies. A Tank Talk survey of 12 leading "majors" points a different picture. Contributing Editor Tom Lampros asked the listed companies the type of underground tank that was specified for corporate- outned facilities. If an FRP tank was specified, Lampros also asked if the oil company required a vinyl ester resin for storage of high concentrations of methanol. (Editor's note: n/a stands for not applicable.) 4 4. GENERAL, REQUIREMENTS 4.1. The nsi.bility for supplying a tank in strict c these stt - P 3 m Specifications, including all cur. Tables, Supplements, Addenda, etc. is the sti -P3m I-aLA = • s . Aaso careful inspection in a000 rdance with current sti. -P3m ives to assure ooe liance with sti -P a is the . Li Iseets nsi i Under no c may arty part of the nsibilities be delegated or ass i=,ed to a coater, , tWer installer, hauler or anv other seoonrd 492 mi,LSt meet the fabrication and onance reqairen*n of the latest issue of Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. UL - 58 Steel Undexground Storage Tanks for Fl le and Combustible Liquids or the curxwen edition of the ASME C3ode, Section VIII, Division I for anessure, Vessels. Otherwise a detailed drawing must be bmi pr tted to SQL for ap su oval prior to fabrication . All tanks and fabrications mist meet the L of any appli vable specifications, standards, codes or regulations. 4.2.1. Mr-58 notwi the material thickness for any y sti -P 3 � shall be #10 gauge. 4.2.2. If a tank that otherwise meets the ement of tTL -58 but has an cspening or openings below the top axis they may be considered standard and not r equ i re submmission to, and apps of STI. However, any cypenings eoctendiM Xan the tank horizontally, beyond 3 0 0 f rcea the Top cent,erl it e , mist be flanged with flange isolation kits and nylon ba&dMs may not be used. see AnDer N, 4.2 .3. Satisfactory design and fabrication of the tank or structure) for the purpose to which it is to be applied is the respo nsibility of the Licensee* Drawings submitted to STI for approval will only be checked for the %0*XL application of the sti. -P Corrosion Control System, 4.2.4. M-58 describers weld joints without quality starriards. SI'Y has established weld quality standards for use on sti -P e 3 See J for weld profile is . If difficulty is experienced in achieving quality welds, Li ce n s ees should consult their welding equipment and supplies dealer for g uidance . 4.294.1. Head joints numbered 19, 20, 21 and 22 in UL S tandard 58 8th Edition, are not considered good practice due to the difficulty of adequately coating the ends of the shell. ?hese joints are not xaanalAmnd ed and will be PrOhibited for use on sti -P a Tanks a� Jul 1, 19879 4 3 Y . 2.5. On all UL lasted tanks n steel striker plates shal be led on the interior bottcens under each open ' Effective: 02 -01-90 sti-P3 m SPfl=CATIRs S�eroedes: 03- 01-,89 (STI Copyright., All Rights Faesesved) gage 5 4.2.5.1. The striker plates shall be 8" x 8 x 1/4 ni nimm size. Striker plates may be flat or rolled to conform to the internal surface of the tank, The effect of a flat striker plate placed in the bottcm of small diameter tanks must be considered. Striker plates m . st also be pla ced under ma"Ways with fittings. The diameter of the striker plate must be equal to or greater Uw i the diameter of the .y opening. The thickn Waist be a :1/4" ninimn. 4.2.6. Stainless steel, tanks that are not ocupletely contained wig a carbon steel tank are not authorized by by these sti P3 PPecif �cat�ons and may not bear the st4-P3 m le 4.2.7. Only tanks made in strict accordance with these �i ications and manufactured by fabricators licensed by Steel Tank Institute may be labelled "sti.- P 4.2.8. variances 4 4 - these specifications may not be made until such alterations or ammendments have been ubm in writing to S''I'Z headquarters and approved in writing. 4.2.9. Licensoees should consult S`iTI for interpretations or solutio to individual difficult or unusual problems which do not seem to be covered by these sti -P m Specifications. Assistance will be given on the specific problem but are not to be interpreted Z setting precedents until, and if, revisions to the :_ecif ications are issued , 4.2.10 There are certain labelling requirements for sti -P3 (See I) . e Tanks, 4.3 . Attacbments to the tank Shall be so designed that the coating will readily cover all swrfaces. Such att:a& gents slhall be c-eal welded to el or crevices into which the P rotec tive coating is not likely to penetrate, 4.3 Lifting lugs shall be of the plate type, adequately designed for the load and seal welded as illustrated in R. 4.3.2. Major Metallic . attac bents to the tank, either by the fabricator or the installer, are not rto.. �.� ended. However, if such attachments are necessary, they �1 be either electrically insulated froam the tank or shall conform to the cif ications for coating -the tmnk on all surfaces that may be exposed to the urd envirorment, The surface area of the grvunded. attadments shall be included in selecting the P4 oper size and number of anodes, Arrangements mast be made so that attachments that are grounded to the tank, will be electrically isolated from the i and other foreign piping structures when installed in the field* 4.4. ' A ion Prover 2 . (PPZ e) Protection Prover 1 (Pple) or equivalent sign monitor, must be iTztalled, as spawn in H, and is on each tank. (N=: The PPl can not be used with weld -on anodes) . Prior to painting, any co ion shall be Protected to prevent coating fra later interfering with the integrity of the electrical connection. , (See D for prcper connection p Ire) . Effective: 02 -01-90 sti _P3 03 -0189 (STI OvPYx'ight. All Rights Resexved) Paces 6 37200 Federal Register / Vol. 53, No. 105 / Friday, Septct 23, 1980 / Rules and Regulations .,s ue . . cmwwwwrnm spills and overfills in accordance with 1280-53. § 280.31 operation and maintenance of corrosion protection. All owners and operators of steel UST systems with corrosion protection must comply with the following requirements to ensure that releases due to corrosion are prevented for as long as the UST systern is used to store regulated substances: (a) All corrosion protection systems must be operated and maininined to continuously provide corrosion protection to the metal components of th:+t portion of the tank and piping that routinely contain regulated substances atld are in contact with the ground. (brAll UST systems equipped with C" tliodic .protection systems must be inspected for proper operation by R . .qualified cathodic protection tester in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Frequency. All cathodic protection systems must be tested within 6 months of installation and at least every 3 years thereafter or according to another reasonable time frame established by the implementing agency; and (2) Inspection criteria. The criteria that are used to determine that cathodic .protection is adequate as required by this section must be in accordance with a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association. Note: National Association of Corrosion Engineers Standard RP- 02-85. "Control of External Corrosion on Metallic Buried.. Partially Buried. or Submerged Liquid Storage Systems." may be used to comply with paragraph (b)(2) of this section. (c) UST systems with impressed current cathodic protection systems must also be inspected every 60 days to ensure the equipment is running - properly. (d) For UST systems using cathodic protection, records of the operation of the cathodic protection must be maintained (in accordance with 1280.34) to demonstrate compliance with the performance standards in this section. These records must provide the following: (1) The results of the last three inspections required in paragraph tc) of this section; and (2) The results of testing from the last two inspections required in paragraph (b) of this section. 1280.32 Compatibility. Owners and operators mu: t use an UST system made of or lined with materials that are compatible with the substance stored in the UST systern. Nate: Owner% nnti operniurs staring elcuhol Mentir. m:+t• «ce tine ksllowii�g cocks 10 comply with the trquit:^ments of this section: (n) Anicricnn Petrult -tion Institute Publinatinn M G. "S i irp and I lonclling Ethanol and Gasoline- Eth%tin] Plends at Vistribution'rcrntinnis And Service Stations ": and (h) Anipricrn Pen nieuni Institute i'ublicntinn )G27, "Storage rind i landling of Cnsrline- MrtlunnolICoselvent Blinds at Distribution TeTrninnis anrd Service Stations." § 280.33 Repairs allowed. Owners and cip er n tors of UST systems must ensure that repairs will prevent relenses doe to structurzl failure or corrosion tot. long as the UST system is used to store regulated substances. The repairs must meet the foHowing regWrcments: (a) Reppirs to t!ST st•stems must tie proper)v cnml>icted in accordance with a cede of 1 :lclice developed by a nationally rc-crtgnized association or an independent testing laboratory. Nntc: Thr following codes and standards i.riy be used to comply with narngtAph (a) of this section: Nution:il Firp Protection Association Standard 3n.-Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code "; Americnn Petn,leum Institute Publication 2203. "Repairing Crude Oil. Liquified Petroleum Gas. and Product Pipelines "; American Petroleum Institute Publicetion 1031, "Recommended Practice for the Interior Lining of Existing Steel Underground Stornne Tanks"; and National Leak Prevention Association Standard 631. "Spill Prevention. hiini num 10 Year life Extension of Existing Steel Underground Tanks by Lining Without the Aid °tam. of Cas thodic Prose ion." (b) Repairs to fiberglass - reinforced plastic tanks may be made by the manufacturer's authorized representativ or in accordance with a code of practice developed by a notionally recognized association or an independent testing laboratory. (c) Metal pipe sections and fittings that have released product as a result of corrosion or other damage must tie replaced. Fiberglass pipes and fittings maybe repnircd in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. (d) Repaired tangs and piping must be tightness tested in accordance with § 2 .43(c) and 12 .44(b) within 30 days follow the date of the . completion of the rppafir except as Provided in paragraphs (d) (1) through (3), of this section: (1) The repaired tank is internally inspected in Accordance with a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or an independent testing laboratory; or (2) The repaired portion of Ilia UST system is rnomitornd monthly for releases in acct specified in 1 21 i -�- (3) Another to determined by to be no less pr and the enviroi above. (e) Within 6 repair of any c: UST system, it system must be tested in accordance with 1 280.31 (b) and (c) to ensure that it is operating properly. (1) UST system owners and operators must maintain records of each repair for the remaining operating life of the UST system that demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this section. 1280.34 Reporting and recordkeeping. Owners and operators of UST systems must cooperate fully with inspections, monitoring and testing conducted by the implementing agency, as well as requests for document submission, testing, and monitoring by the owner or operator pursuant to section 9005 of Subtitle 1 of the Resource Con servitlion and Recovery Act, as amended. (a) Reporting. Owners and operators must submit the following information to the implementing agency: (1) Notification for all UST systems ( 280.221, which includes certification of installation for new UST systems (� 280.20(e)), (2) Reports of all releases including suspected releases (1 280.50). spills and overfills (§ 280.53), and confirmed releases (§ 280.61): (3) Corrective actions planned or taken. including initial abatement measures (§ 280.62). initial site choracterization (1 280.63), free product removal (§ 280.64). investigation of soil and ground -water cleanup (1 280 .65)9 and corrective action plan (§ 240.66); and (4) A notification before permanent closure or change - in - service (1 280.71). (h) Recondkeeping. Owners and operators must maintain the following information: (1) A corrosion expert's analysis of site corrosion potential if corrosion protection equipment is not used (§ 280.20(a)(4); § 280.20(b)(3)). (2) Documentation of operation of cor. osion protection equipment (3) Documentation of UST system repairs (1 280.3310); (4) Recent compliance with release detection requirements (§ 280.95); and ( .5) Results of the site investigation conducted at permanent closure (§ 2n0.74). Maplewood Planning Commission -5- Minutes 5 -7 -90 Code Amendment: Motor Fuel Stations Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Bill Hentges, vice president of the Hentges Company, spoke in favor of amending this ordinance. Commissioner Anitzberger said that he has read information from the Environmental Protection Agency that in the next ten years their requirements will become more stringent for underground storage of tanks and will require underground monitoring systems. The commissioners discussed with Mr. Hentges at what depth tanks and piping are buried at and compared the different types of underground storage tanks. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance requiring all new or replacement underground or above ground fuel storage tanks shall meet.the standards of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 116 and rules promulgated thereunder. In p addition, plans for insta llation shall be approved by the State Fire Marshal's office and shall have a UL listing appropriate for its use. Commissioner Cardinal seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Barrett, Cardinal, Fischer, Rossbach , , S igmund ik , Sinn Nays- -Gerke The motion passed. e. Land Use klassificati Secretary O1 on pres nted the staff report for the osed chap to eplace the land use classifications prop in the Com reh siv P Plan with the City's zoning district classi • tions. The commissioner iscussed the advantages and o i . lementing this change in the disadvantages Comprehensive lan to invest iga what o er commissioner Fischer asked staff p metro cities use the same desi nation and if th have problems. The Commission agreed to r fer thi g s ite to staff to investigate and p to be la d on a future agenda for reconsideration. MOW Action by Counoil :, AGENDA REPORT Endoreec-- . ---,,, „ Mo dif i ed.,,.�,.,,. -�. To: Rej ec City Manager Michael McGuire :, From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins . '- Date Subject: Application For Liquor License - Chili's Grill & Bar Date: May 4, 199.0 Introduction Scott C. Smith has made application for an intoxicating i uor license for Chili's ' g q 1� s Grill & Bar, which will be located at the southeast corner of Beam Avenue and Southlawn Drive, Background An investigation has been done on Mr. Smith; and he has no known contacts with the police, nor can we find that he holds a liquor license at any other establishment in the State of Minnesota. Recommendation After a careful background investigation on this individual i v i dual and a discussion sc i ussion with him, I do not find sufficient reason to deny his application for an intoxicating 1 i quor license, Ac_t'i_on Required Application for i ntox i cat i ng 1 i quor 1 i cense, for City Council review and approval or denial. KVC: j s cc City Clerk � Liquor File 90- 005592 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD APPLICATION F OR E11TOXICATIN G LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE, Whoever shall knowingly and wilfully falsif the answers to the following questionnaire sh dee m*ed guilty of per y rY'and shall be Punished accordin all be In answerin the followin questions "APPLICANTS" shall be governe d as follows: For a Cor- Poration one officer shall execute this application for all officers, directors and stockholde' Aershb one of the "APP LICANTS , shall execute this application for all members of the For a part. he • Partnership. EVERY QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED Scott Charles Smith* as Supervis for and in behalf C hili's' hilil (Individual owne officer I er or partner) Of Minnesota,- Inc. hereb appl for an On SaIj and Sunda On -Sale Li License to be located at SouthAn g+- Corner of Beam Avenue and Southlawn Drive, Mar)lewni d MN See attached Exhibit "All for legal descri 2tion.). (Give address and le description in the Cit of Maplewood, Count of Ramse State of Minnesota, in 95 of Maplewood, accordance with the Provisions of Ordinance No. 2. Give aPPI!cantst date of birth Scott Charles Smith. 13 ........ . June 1955 (Day) (Month) (Year) 3. The residence for each of the applicant named herein for the past five years is as follow 20260 Cottagewood,Rd Excelsior MN 55331 (temporaril from 5/1 to 1404 Fors the Drive, Richardson, TX 75081 - (11/80 Present) * .• *Mr. Smith is commuti between both addresses at the in 7� present Me 90.___ 'permanent HO 7 31 ..... he wil e in is 4. Is the applicant a citizen of the United States Yes If naturalized . state date and place of naturalization If a corporation or partnership, state citizenship includin naturalization of each officer or partner. n/a A 3. 4 5 61 ti ,8 ,9 10 9, 4P g 59 The Person who executes this and address.—IP it Ij; 1, AIA application shall give wifeps or husband's full name and address,-, Deborah Jean Smith -1 4 Q 4 6. What occupations have applicant and associates in this application followed for the past fiv y ea S., INc rs ? � ; �. 7 * s / �, ., Chili Operations Management Genera i Manager, Fralichise coo t`. Director of Opening Positions have included rain or, enin n Units U111t Supervisor, ........... for Special Concepts and Area Supervisor. jj �: Ls inc-LuIded fliri 9, t ainin P respons' It manager, �; '. new unit development, etc, n y 14 f. 2 . ?. If p artnership,, state name and address of each partner_ n / a _ 3/24/89 state in If a corporation, date of incorporatio M innesota , amount of authorized capitalization which incorporate amount of paid in capita 1 000 -- $1 8 000 • n so state wholly owned subsidiary o f if a subsidiary of any other corporation, h'1'' nc a Delaware cox oration to e4gage in any lawful act n or activity give purpose of corporat name and address of all officers, directors and stockholders and the number of shares held by each: 16309 Sunset Vall Dallas, TX 75248 - - * President - Ronald A. McDou all, (City) (Address) * Vice Preside �"1e) TX 75248 -0- & Treas. -James R. Parish, 6936 Vista Willow, Dallas, •.r ., ViCe President ' - L. Call , 16802 Bradgate Court, Dallas, TX 75248 -0 -$ & Sec. Robert S MINNESOT , -INC. *DENOTES DIRE CT OR CHI I a, Directors: Same as above officers (See Exhibit B) F �hibit C) —100%. ' s Chili's, Inc. , a Delaware corporation (See Sole Shareholder i • under the laws of another state, is corporation authorized to do business in this If incorporated - ;s: n/a 02 State? n a Number of. certificate of authority k All yr, „` � I• ,�,r.?�,• •••'r ' for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and If this application is Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws for Chili's of Minnesota, Inc. and By -Laws. (For Artic s D F and G. Chili's, Inc • , see Exl sm �cated or to be locate ground-le On what floor is the establi shh E m, to " ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? BCM If operating under a zoning Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? 13. Yes • academy, college, Is the establishment located near an aca y, e, university, church, .grade or high school? 8 No State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc in excess of 1 000 feet, see attached Exhibit "H” Location Map North Suburban Company, 95 South State name and address of owner of building Owasso Blvd . , St. Pau 1, MN 5511 y owner -of building any connection, directly or in- N directly, with applicant? es on the above property delinquent? No Are the taxes . State whether nt of his associates in this application, have ever had nn application appl�ca or any for a Liquor. Iucense r ej Y ' ected b any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details No 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revdked for N o Y an violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail Hum { tt wa y ; A a %� 1 1 1� 1 u. �P k All yr, „` � I• ,�,r.?�,• •••'r ' for a new Corporation, include a certified copy of Articles of Incorporation and If this application is Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws for Chili's of Minnesota, Inc. and By -Laws. (For Artic s D F and G. Chili's, Inc • , see Exl sm �cated or to be locate ground-le On what floor is the establi shh E m, to " ordinance, how is the location of the building classified? BCM If operating under a zoning Is the building located within the prescribed area for such license? 13. Yes • academy, college, Is the establishment located near an aca y, e, university, church, .grade or high school? 8 No State the approximate distance of the establishment from such school or churc in excess of 1 000 feet, see attached Exhibit "H” Location Map North Suburban Company, 95 South State name and address of owner of building Owasso Blvd . , St. Pau 1, MN 5511 y owner -of building any connection, directly or in- N directly, with applicant? es on the above property delinquent? No Are the taxes . State whether nt of his associates in this application, have ever had nn application appl�ca or any for a Liquor. Iucense r ej Y ' ected b any municipality or State authority; if so, give date and details No 14. Has the applicant, or any of his associates in this application, during the five years immediately preceding this application ever had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revdked for N o Y an violation of such laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and detail Hum { tt wa y ; A a %� State whether applicant, or an of his associates in this application, - durin g that past five years were ever convicted of an Liquor La violations or an crime in this state, or an other state, or under Federal Laws, and if so No give date and details 4 6 16. Is applicant, or an of his associates in this application, a member of th g overnin g bod of the municipality in 'Which this license is to be is 7 No ran,?.;., su ed . If so, in what capacit ? a 1 g 17.- State whether an person other than applicants has an fixtures, ore quipment in right, title or interest in the furniture, 4 the premises for which license is applied, and if so, give names and details s Yes Chilit -q- of Minnesota, Inc. i a wh 011y owned 1� ;;;;t , .;,;; ; ; 18. Chi air X or es and which owns fixtures . inventory a the bu.ildin f urniture, Agreement on a Delaware cor)*oration, which has entered the Premises, -- 'I into a Lease -41---equ4Pment etc, ture.. (See aff-,nr�hed Lea se AcTmt- Exhibit"I'l F�*� Have applican any interest whatsoever directl or indirectl in an ot in the State of M e No her li establishment `` innesota. Give name and address of such establishmen n/a �'' See attached WchWbit 1r A f f 4 19. Furnish the name's and addresses of at least three business references, includin one bank refer- ence Don Reagan, 13150 Harriet Ave., #196—B, Burnsville MN 55337 Jim Collins, 7700 Kahill, #116, Edina, MN 55435 Laurie Duxb OLir C/o Norwest- 6 4- —008 20. Do y ou Possess a retail dealer's identification card issued by the Liquor Control Comm issioner which will expire December 3.1st o this year? Give number of sa No - w4 P1 aPPIV Prior to openin 21. Does applicant intend to sell intoxicatin li to other than the consumer? No 22. State whether applicant intends to Possess, operate the . licensed premises or in an room adidi or permit the Possession or opera . tion of, on nin the licensed premises, an slot machine, dic tilin device and a e, g am- pparatus, or permit an gamblin therein--__ 23. Are the premises now occupied, o to be Occupied, b the applicant entirel separate and exclusive from any other business establishment?, YP- . Q —1-1,e licensed rem' Occupied b a chili' Grill & Bar restaurant there is no remises will be es tablishment on i-hAz -% -e other 24. State trade name to be used Chili' Grill & Bar 25• State name of Person that wil o perate store-Rana ger will be identified later • Zile amendment to applic -will 26. Give Federal Retail Liquor Dealer's Tax Stamp Numbe - 75-2297765 at Ion, 17.1 j4 27. If off sale license is being applied for, do you intend to deliver liquor uy vuwa -iG �-.-- — -- 1 state number of brio for vehicle permits issued by Liquor Control Commissioner for current year 2 28. If ou are building a new building for the purposes for which this app lication is being made, Please it6 P 1 a y See Ex ' _:�`'Prbtotype:i 5AX S submit plans and specifications with this application. Requirements; Ex. " L " - Site Plan; p - the subject Ex* "M" - Elevations. . The licensed remises is currently and E his building will be as follows. 29. Financing of the construction of this Qf_ -. t�l� r A� �' a t t r a n t- w i t 1. -- T • total cost of con_s.��c- t<.14�nd.. siey�lopm•er... funds of Chili's, be paid for in cash out of the internally-generated I 1 J ` statement with this application. If a partnership, furnish financial state - 30. Furnish a personal financial ment of each partner. See Financial Statement attached as Exhibit "O" 31. Give description of type of operation if this is an on -sale license application (i.e. whether cock - tail lounge, nite club, restaurant, etc., specifying capacity by number of customers and any other pertinent data) Full service restaurant w /bar; seating ca acit is 217 (Protototype 5AX Floor Plan attached as Exhibit "P" d in the 32. What previous expeiience have you had operation of the type of business described in the P answer to No. 31 above - Chili's Inc. - May 1984 - Present - O erations Positions have included General Mana er Franchise Coordinator Unit S D' rector o f Opening jJn1 is for Special Opening P �- ' rhorit has included hire ncr, trai ning, Concepts and Area S nor . u . A_ P &L responsibility, manager, new unit - developmew t 3 PP h all the laws of the State 3 Ap and his associates in this application, will strictly comply of I�Iicinc5ota g • vernin the taxation and the sale of intoxicating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by q • the Liquor Control Commissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality, an I hereby certif • ' that I have read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge. t t . .• �'rt l �. '4 ', ,r' iss I 1. �A � A•ryr (�.. t i sln �, t•.SK SCOTT CHARLES SMITH •If Signatixie of Applicant) � I Subscribed and sworn to before me this ..1 .• .. 1 t • ~lam. r" .i .• yv \ ,' •"? i � �.��1•, ,1 y Il y\ '� f A r 1 19� c�,�. _ ....,� ►•.� ' • ,+ ,•r Y ., � 1' : l• t. r♦ •.: . . ... •. , r •+ ' ) / � ,I , fit, `. •,•.. J `'' •`, TR t lfY .!' 4 !i , I� , r ►w- rY ''q�� WITH YOUR CHECK TIi IS APPLICATION MUST BE ACCOMPANIED ` FOR THE FIRST LICENSE. PEIIIOD. **of a conditional use per and Desig R,ev�.ew Board application with the conditional the City t` of Maplewood. Site and building plan changes arising out of p file in the Of f ice < 1 be on use permit and Design Review Board process are or will of the Department of Community Deve lopment. in Mi In lm� N: E 'm E CITY OF MAPLEWOOD , 1830 E. County Road 8 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109- APPLICATION FOR • SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE I Scott Charles Smith do Southeast doi ng business at Corner of BeaM A 2out - Dr. Maplesjogd , under the business name of -hilU Gr . , hereby make appl ication for a license to sell liquor between the hours of 10:00 A.M. • and 12.00 midnight on Sundays at the above location. I hereby certify that meals are served and wi be served* on Sundays, at this location • that there is table seating capacity for 30 or more . persons at one time, and that I presently hold on sale liquor license issued by the City of Maplewood. Signed, l� i Name S C0 CHARLES SMITH • 20260 Cottagewood Rd., Excelsior, MN • 55331 Addre The seating a acit 217 8 P y at the -above is o Date: April 1990 License Fee is ;200.00 per year. License y ear . y r is from January 1 thru December 31) LICENSE FEE PAID RECEIPT NO, LICENSE NO, EXHIBIT 11 11 FIWWC =A-t STATEMENT OF SCOTT CAS ST�IITH Ca Interest_bea .bearing Invest Securit ments $ 3 1500.00 � Automobile 1,500.00 11500000 Real, Estate e Personal Property 23,000,00 14 0,000.00 Hous ehold Sehold Contents � Stock options 25 ,000000 20,000000 TOTAL ASSETS 30 ,000.00 _ $ Accounts Payab y le Notes Payable $ 2 X Real Estate Note Pa yable e Payable 0.0 Mortg 9' ayable 24,0000 00 74 •000000 TOTS L=ABzLITI Es $115,000 NET WORTg $ C :1 WP'6U c ens es \M i s c l F i nan c i a l Form