The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992 11-09 City Council PacketAGENDA A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of Claims Financial Transfers Financial Transfers Financial Transfers Financial Transfers Financial Transfers Financial Transfers Financial Transfers Ambulance Bill - AP to Minutes of Meeting 92 -20 (October 26, 1992) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion. There w i l l be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes' to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. 2, 3, 4, 50 6, 7, 8. 9. 10. 11. 12, 13, 14. 15. 16. MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 9, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 92 -21 to Close to Close to Close to Close to Close to Close to Close �pI ication Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement Improvement for Cancell� Project 84 -12 Project 86 -15 Project 86 -22 Project 86 -25 Project 87 -13 Project 87 -19 Project 87 -44 at i on Final Plat: Toenjes Farm Budget Transfer: City Clerk Budget Transfer: Street Lights Plan Approval Resolution: McKnight Road Bike Path, Project 90 -06 Proclamation: Community Values Week Relief Association Benefit Changes Joy Park G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M.: 2660 Keller Parkway (Bruns) a. Variance b. 3 Variations c. Registered Land Survey H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Sign Plan Change: Maplewood Corner Shoppes J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request by Cottages of Maplewood for Amendment of Agreement Related to Tax Increment 2. Policy on Filing Conciliation Court Claims for Ambulance Bills 3. Change Order - District 22 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project 91 -10 4. Change Order - Sterling Street Project 87 -45 5. Approval of Purchase: 2134 White Bear Avenue 6. Demolition of Buildings at Heritage Center (2005 Edgerton Street) K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1.December Meetings 2. N. ADJOURNNENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, October 26, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building ' Meeting No. 92.20 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7 :02 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL.CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Special City Council Meeting, October 5, 1992 Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of Special. Council Meeting of October 5,. 1992 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 2. Minutes of Meeting 92 -19 (October 12, 1992) Mayor Bastian moved, to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 92 -19 (October 12 1992 ) as corrected: Page 15, I.2: Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach, Zappa ,Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Carlson Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: U. Phalen Place Stop Signs L2. Commission L3. Mayor's Update F9. Withdrawn From Agenda M1. Police Consolidation Meeting Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 1 10 -26 -92 EA. PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation: HOSPICE CARE MONTH a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Proclamation and moved its adoption: HOSPICE CARE MONTH November, 1992 WHEREAS, HealthEast Hospice Services located at St. John's Hospital is an essential component of health care in the Maplewood Community; and WHEREAS, HealthEast Hospice physicians, nurses, counselors, therapists, members of the clergy, and volunteers combine their abilities together to provide a positive and caring environment for terminally ill i ndi vi dual s in their final days; and WHEREAS, the compassionate and dedicated men and women who provide hospice care help terminally ill patients cope with death and reaffirm their dignity and self worth; and WHEREAS, the committed team of professionals and volunteers also help the families of terminally ill patients deal with their grief and loss; and WHEREAS, the devoted HealthEast Hospice personnel shall be recognized for their contributions when the nation is observing National Hospice Month to ensure that HealthEast Hospice Services persevere as an integral alternative for terminally ill patients and their f a m i l i e s . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Gary W. Bastian, Mayor of the City of Maplewood, do hereby proclaim the month of November, 1992 as HOSPICE CARE MONTH in Maplewood, and call upon the citizens to convey their sincere appreciation and gratitude for the devoted and benevolent endeavors of all HealthEast Hospice Care Providers, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Maplewood to be affixed this 26th day of October, in the year.of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety -two. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all F. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Zappa moved, seconded by Councilmember Rossbach: ayes.- all, to approve the consent agenda items 1 - 8 and 10 - 13 as recommended. (Item 9 was deleted from the Agenda.) 2 10 -26 -92 Approval of Cl aims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 747 .S 414e449,47 $1,161,536.04 PAYROLL: 198 42,552.53 $ 240 J1.402,395.03 Checks #23692 - #23759 Dated 10 -01 -92 thru 10 -14 -92 Checks #18672 - #18834 Dated 10-26.92 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks #28893 thru #29053 Dated 10 -09 -92 Payroll Deduction Checks #29052 thru #29081 dated 10 -09 -92 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Financial Transfer to Close Improvement Project 81 -20 Approved the financing plan, authorized the appropriate budget adjustments and approved the transfers necessary to close this project. 3. Financial Transfer to Close Improvement Project 83 -01 Approved the financing plan, authorized the appropriate budget adjustments and approved the transfers necessary to close this project. 4. Financial Transfer to Close Improvement Project 83 -07 Approved the financing plan, authorized the appropriate budget adjustments and approved the transfers necessary to close this project. S. Financial Transfer to Close Improvement Project 86 -03 Approved the financing plan, authorized the appropriate budget adjustments and approved the transfers necessary to close this project. 6. Financial Transfer to Close Improvement Project 90 -05 Authorized the appropriate budget adjustments and approved a transfer from the General Fund to close the fund for Project 90 -050 7. Revised Financing Plan for Improvement Project 85 -17 Approved the financing plan, authorized the appropriate budget adjustments and approved the transfers necessary to close this project. 8. Budget Transfer Finance Department Authorized the transfer of $1,730 from the General Fund Contingency Account to the Finance Department budget to finance collection agency fees. 9. Budget Transfer: City Clerk Department Deleted from Agenda 3 10 -26 -92 10. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2425 Maryland Avenue (Beaver Lake Estates) Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for Beaver Lake Estates Manufactured Home Park at 2425 Maryland Avenue for five years, at which time it will again be reviewed. 11. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1375 -1487 Century Avenue No. (Rolling Hills Manufactured Home Park) Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permits for Rolling Hills Manufactured Home Parks at 1375 -1487 Century Avenue for five years, at . which time it will again be reviewed. 12. Frisbee Hill Zone Change (4 Votes) 92 10 - 141 ZONING NAP CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the K. & J. Corporation applied for a change in the zoning map from R -2 (single and double dwellings) to R -1 (single dwellings). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located on the north side of Frisbie Avenue between English and Frank Streets. The legal description is: The south 130 feet of the north 990 feet of the N.E. 1 /4 of S.E. 1 /4 (subject to streets, avenues and drainage easement) in Section 16, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On August 17, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on October 12, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above described change in the zoning map for the following reasons 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4 10 -26 -92 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools 5. The developer does not need an R -2 zone. 13. Certification of Delinquent Sewer Rental Accounts 92 - 10 - 142 CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT SEWER BILLS RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the attached list of delinquent sewer rental charges and hydrant charges, said l i s t made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1992, collectible in 1993, and which listing includes interest at the rate of five percent (5%).on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $ 78,542.12 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., 2719 Stillwater Road (Yocum Oil) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request from Tony Yocum for an addition to the Yocum Oil building which will require a parking lot striping plan,.a Conditional Use Permit and a variance from City zoning code. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. C. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the Planning Commission Report. e. Boar member Bruce Thompson presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard. Tony Yocum, the applicant Joe Bauman, Krause - Anderson g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 5 10 -26 -92 Variance h Counci 1 member Zappa introduced the following Resolution and , moved its adoption: 92 - 10 - 143 ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE WHEREAS, Anthony Yocum applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance at 2719 Stillwater Road. The Legal description is: Lot 15, Block 5, Midvale Acres, No 2 WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(7,) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires Mr. Yocum' s proposed building addition to be 80% screened from the lot to the west. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to use the existing trees as screening which would provide less than 80% screening. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission on October 5, 1992. The recommended that the City Council approve the variance. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on 10- 26 -92. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The.Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. Meeting the, screening requirement would cause the applicant undue hardship. It is not feasible to screen 80% of the addition from the adjacent property. Because of the sloping yard, the north end of the addition would be two stories tall. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance because: a) The addition would be compatible in design with a residential building. b) The neighbor at 2711 Stillwater Road does not object to the addition and is not requesting additional screening. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 6 10 -26 -92 Conditional Use Permit i. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption_ 92 - 10 - 144 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Anthony Yocum applied for a conditional use permit to build an addition to his office 15 feet from the adjacent residential lot line. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2719 Stillwater Road. The legal description is. Lot 15, Block 5, Midvale Acres No. 2 WHEREAS, the history of this Conditional Use Permit is as follows. 1 . The Planning Commission discussed t h i s application on October 5, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on October 26, 1992. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 39 The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run - off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks, 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 7 10 -26 -92 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 10. The setback is consistent with the setbacks for surrounding properties. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Parking Spaces j Councilmember Zappa moved to approve seven fewer parking spaces than City Codr,qui res on the basis that:, 1. There will be 24 more parking spaces that the number of employees. 2. There is excess parking available now and Mr. Yocum is not planning any additional employees. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Plans k. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the plans the City stamped .September 15, 1992 subject to the following conditi ons : 1. Striping of the upper and lower parking lots, including the required handicap- parking spaces. 20 Installation of a handicap- parking sign for each handicap- parking space. 3. Submission of a grading and drainage plan to the City Engineer for approval. 4. Repeat of this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. Seconded by Councilmember.Rossbach Ayes - all 29 7 :16 P.M. off -Sale Liquor License - MGM Liquor a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding an application from MGM Liquor for an off-sale intoxicating 1 i quor license at 2950 White Bear Avenue. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Gary E. Hanscom, 16050 Jenkins Street, Ham Lake, the applicant d. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 8 10 -26 -92 e. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 10 - 145 APPROVAL OF LIQUOR LICENSE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to action by the city Council of the city of Maplewood on October 26, 1992, an Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Gary E. Hanscom, dba MGM Liquor, 2950 White Bear avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109, The Council. proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinances. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all H. AWARD -OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance (2nd Reading: 3 Votes required for Sections I and 2, changing the ordinance; 4 Votes required for Section 3 setting fees.) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Zappa moved to aDprove Sections l and 2 of the revised Building Plan Review Ordinance, Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembers Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker Notion Failed 2. Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b.. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adNt t on 9 10 -26 -92 ORDINANCE N0. 707 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLINGS The Maplewood City Council approves the following Ordinance: 41- Section 1. This section changes three existing definitions and adds seven new definitions to Section 36-6. Covered structure: A structure with a roof. Front l i ne of the dwel l ing: The longer side of a building that faces a street. If the front wall has an angle, the longest section shall be the front line. The length of parallel sections shall be added together to determine the longest section. On an interior lot, the Director of Community Development may consider the short side of the building to be the front. The Director shall base this decision on the design of the house. Front lot line: The lot l i n e that abuts a street right -of -way l i n e . On a corner lot, the front lot line shall be the line that is most parallel to the front l i n e of the dwelling. If the City determines that the dwelling has no front line or that the line is equally .parallel to both lot lines, then the property owner shall choose a front lot line. Lot depth: The distance from the front lot line to the rear lot lines. Predominant setback: The setback of the majority of the dwellings on the same side of the same street and within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the lot to be built on. Rear lot line: The lot line that is opposite and most parallel to the front lot line. Side lot line: The lot lines that connect the front and rear lot lines. Front yard setback: The distance between any part of a structure and a street right -of -way line. A corner lot shall have a front yard setback on. each street frontage. The front yard setback shall not include eaves, gutters, cornices or chimneys that project no more than two (2) feet into the yard. The front yard setback shall also not include sidewalks, steps, ramps or at -grade patios that have no walls, solid fence or roof. Rear yard setback: The distance between any part of a structure and the rear property line. The rear yard shall not include eaves, gutters, cornices, steps, ramps or chimneys that project no more than two (2) feet into the yard. Side yard setback. The distance between any part of a structure and the side property line. The side yard shall not include eaves, gutters, cornices, steps, ramps or chimneys that project no more than two (2) feet into the yard, Section 2. This section changes Section 36 -70 through 36 -72, R -1 (single dwelling) district regulations, as follows: 10 10 -26 -92 r Sec.36 -70. Front yards. (a) Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more than thirty- ., five (35) feet. Except that: 1) If each of the lots next to an interior lot have dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling farthest from the street. 2) If subsection (a) 1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further forward and no more than five feet- to the rear of the predominant .setback.. 3) Regardless of the above, if the Council has approved special setbacks for a development, these setbacks shall apply. Approval of a prel imi nary plat with building pads does not constitute approval of setbacks. 4) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (b) The Director of Community Development may allow a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2) The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in section 9 -188. 3) The proposed setback is necessary to meet City, State or Federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations. 4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving, health or safety reasons. Sec. 36 -71. Side yards. (a) There shall be aside yard setback of at least ten (10) feet to any covered .part of a dwelling. There shall be a side yard setback of at least five (5) feet to a garage, uncovered structure or a detached accessory structure. The following exceptions shall apply: 1) The front yard setback requirements shall apply to the side yard on the street side of a corner lot. 2) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. 3) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. 11 10 -26 -92 (b) The City Council may approve a conditional use permit to construct a building addition into a minimum setback. I x Sec. 36 -72. Rear yards. (a) For the covered parts of a dwelling, the minimum required rear yard setback shall be aline connecting a point on each side lot line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth. (b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall have a rear yard setback of at least five (5) feet.; except that, on a double- fronting lot, the front yard setback requirements shall apply. (c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line. (d) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (e) The City Council may approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a building addition into a minimum setback. Section 3. This section changes section 36- 83(c)(1) in the R -E Residential Estate Districts as follows: (2) All other setbacks shall be as required for the R -1 Residence District (single dwelling), except that the R -1 front yard setback requirements shall not apply to the RE -40 district. The minimum required front yard setback in an RE -40 district shall be thirty (30) feet. Section 4. This section changes sections 36 -84.4 through 36 -84.6, R -1S (small -lot single dwelling) district regulations, as follows. Sec. 36 -84.4. Front yards. (a) Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a font yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more than thirty- five (35) feet. Except that: 1) If each of the lots adjacent to an interior lot have dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling farthest from the street. 2) If subsection (a) 1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the predominant setback. 3) If the Council has approved special setbacks for a development, these setbacks shall apply. Approval of a preliminary plat with building pads does not constitute approval of setbacks. 4) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. 12 10 -26 -92 (b) The Director of Community Development may allow a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent :homes. 2) The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in Section 9 -188. 3) The proposed setback is necessary to meet City, State or Federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations. 4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy - saving, health or safety reasons. Sec. 36- 84.5. Side yards. (a) There shall be a side yard setback of at least ten (10) feet to any covered part of a dwelling. There shall be a side yard setback of at least five (5) feet to a garage, uncovered structure or detached accessory structure. The following exceptions shall apply: 1) The front yard setback requirements shall apply to the side yard on the street side of a corner lot. 2) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. 3) Regardless'of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (b) The City Council may approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a building addition, or part thereof, into a minimum setback. Sec. 36 44.6. Rear yards. (a) For the covered parts of a dwelling, the minimum required rear yard setback shall be aline connecting a point on each side lot line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth. (b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall have a rear . yard setback of at least five (5) feet; except that, on a double- fronting lot, the front yard setback requirements shall apply. (c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line. (d) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (e) The City Council may approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a building addition into a minimum setback. 13 10 -26 -92 Sec. 36 -89. Front yards. (a) Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a font yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more than thirty- five (35) feet. Except that: 1) If each of the lots adjacent to an interior lot have dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling farthest from the street. 2) If subsection (a) 1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the predominant setback. 3) If the Council has approved special setbacks for a development, these setbacks shall apply. Approval of a preliminary plat with building pads does not constitute approval of setbacks. 4) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (b) The Director of Community Development may allow a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2) The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in Section 9 -188. 3) The proposed setback i s necessary to meet City, State or Federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations. 4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving, health or safety reasons. Sec. 36 -90. Side yards. (a) There shall be a side yard setback of at least ten (10) feet to any covered part of a dwelling. There shall be a side yard setback of at least five (5) feet to a garage, uncovered structure or detached accessory structure. The following exceptions shall apply: 1) The front yard setback requirements shall apply to the side yard on the street side of a corner lot. 2) When two (2) or more adjoining lots are used as a single building site, the side yard requirements shall apply only to the outside lot lines. 3) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. , P 14 10 -26 -92 (b) The City Council may approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a building addition, or part thereof, into a minimum setback. Sec. 36 -91. Rear yards. (a) For the covered parts of a dwelling, the minimum required rear yard setback shall be a line connecting a point on each side lot line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth. (b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall have a rear yard setback of at least five (5) feet; except that., on a double - fronting lot, the front yard setback requirements shall aPPlY• (c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line. (d) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. (e) The City Council may approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a building addition into a minimum setback. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all I. Appointment of Project Review Committee a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian asked -if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. c. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the Project Review Committee compos i ti on as recommended by staff an i ncl ud i nq two residents. d. Councilmember Zappa asked to have three residents on the Committee. e. Mayor Bastian moved to vote on this _proposal in two parts: one on members 1, and 3 -8 with a separate vote on the number of residents. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all Vote on composition of Committee as recommended by staff, excluding number of residents, Ayes - all Vote on number of residents to be included on Committee: ("Aye" vote is a .choice for 2 residents, "Nay" vote will reopen for nomination of 3 residents) : Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Carlson Nays - Council members Juker, Rossbach, Zappa With "Nay" votes predominating, the issue is reopened for nomination of 3 residents to serve on the Project Review Committee 15 10-26-92 f Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Project Review Committee as recommended by staff and to include th_ ree_. res i dents 1. Mayor Gary Bastian 2. Three residents: Joseph Fittipaldi, Don Misgen,.James Roehl 3. Director of Public Works Kenneth Haider 4. Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish 5. Engineering Technician Terry Metz 6. Consulting Engineer David Pi 1 l atzke 79 Contractor Frank Frattalone 8. Staff Coordinator: Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Carlson 4. Stop Signs - Walter at Lydia a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: Leo Johnson, 2983 Walter Street d. Mayor Bastian m= p, to = prov, a instal 1 at i on, of all-way ,stop signs at the intersection of Walter Street and Lydia Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Construction Management Services: Approval of Contract a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: Dick Gunderson, 9757 Ideal Avenue, Mahtomedi, McGough Construction Co. d. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve entering into a $285.000 contract with McGough, Construction , for construction management services for the Maplewood Community. Cent.. er_ Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker e. Councilmember Zappa moved an exception to the retention schedule to save the tapes of this meeting for posterity_ Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 16 10 -26 -92 2. Lot Division Appeal: 1246 Ripley Avenue (Jasper) 1 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics.of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: Delores Jasper, 1246 Ripley, the applicant f. Councilmember Zappa moved to accept staff recommendation and change the lot division condition from a. $10,122, . 70 cash connection charge to a cage of $9,663.00. payable before the new deeds to the property _ are signed by the Cit_y. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 3. Maplewood Square, 3035 white Bear Avenue a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Boardmember Bruce Thompson presented the Community Design Review Board report. d. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard. Richard Schreier, 2125 DeSoto, Maplewood; Building Owner Sign Plan Change d. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve s i gn plan change as recommend by staff with the condition that at the end of their lease, owner will -- reaui re that T -Birds change their sign to conform to the rest of the building_ Seconded by Councilmember Juker Notion Failed Remodeling Plans Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach e. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the remodeling_ plans the City has stamped September 25, 1992 for the Maplewood Square remodeling. and the sign criteria recommended by staff as follows: FASCIA SIGNS (North and South Elevations) 1. The allocated sign area shall be the upper fascia. 2. Signs shall be individual letters and shall be no more than thirty inches in height. T- Birds' existing sign shall comply with the previous approvals. 3. Signs shall be internally illuminated. 17 10 -26 -92 4. A sign shall not cover more than eighty percent of the linear distance of the store to which it is attached. However, all signs shall be set in at least twenty -four inches from the borders of the tenant's lease area. All signs must be centered on the fascia. 5. logos may be used in the allocated sign area but are subject to a maximum height of thirty inches. There shall be no more than one logo per tenant sign panel. FASCIA SIGHS (East and west Elevations) 1. The allocated sign area shall be the upper fascia. 2. Signs shall be individual 1 etters and shall not exceed twenty four inches in height. ' T- Birds' existing sign. shall comply with the previous ap,.proval,s. 30 Signs shall be internally ,illuminated . 4. A sign shall not cover more than eighty percent of the linear distance of the store to which it is attached. However, all signs shall be set in at least twelve inches from the borders of the tenant's lease area. All signs must be centered on the fascia. 5. Logos may be used in the allocated sign area but are subject to a maximum height of twenty -four inches. There shall be no more than one logo per tenant sign panel. PYLON SIGNS: There may be one pylon sign at each end of the walkway (two signs total) . Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 4. Sign Plan Change: Maplewood Corner Shopper a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Boardmember Bruce Thompson presented the Community Design Review Board report. d. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Vince Driessen, Mid- America Entertainment, the applicant John Nelson, Manager of Maplewood Corner Shoppes e. Councilmember Zappa moved to table t h i s item for two weeks to allow more time to study the regue= Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Rossbach 5. Nature Center Addition a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks and Recreation Odegard presented the specifics of the report. 18 10 -26 -92 c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter, The following were heard: Ken Nordby, NAI Architects, 3939 Homewood White Bear Lake Jeanne Ewald, Park and Recreation Commission Peggy Boege, 756 N. McKnight Joe Fox, 1821 Myrtle Street Judy Horsnell, Nature Center employee d. Councilmember Carlson moved to.approve the concept of an addition to the MaDI ewood Nature -Center and approve the hi ri nq of NAI Architects for the additional sum of $4,650.00 to cover architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical e�ngii,neeri nq services regui red for bids and specifications, from funds in the Park Development- Fund for the I►A•�..1 ni.nnrl Alft +aiv►n 1 rkn +nv%. snA +kft+ 11 nnn & - I%Mn l n +-4 nn n- +�V4 nn M +ha 1 will ma Seconded by Mayor Bastian itrac Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Zappa 6. Distribution of Charitable Gambling Funds a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report. C. Councilmember Carlson moved to table to allow staff to investig_ate feasibility of establishing an "endowment" type fund. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 7. Mn /DOT Training Agreement a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to authorize entering into an agreement with Mn /DOT which provides for up to $5,000.00 reimbursement to Maplewood for training leading to certification of Engineering. Technicians: and to authorize 1992 budget changes to reflect a increase in Engineering Department travel and training budget_ Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all S. No Parking: County Road C. Project 89 -04 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. se in th b. Councilmember Zappa introduced the.f flowing Resolution and moved its adoption: 19 10 -26 -92 92 - 10 - 146 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON SAP 138 - 010 -05 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 61 FRONTAGE ROAD) FROM COUNTY ROAD C To KOHLMAN AVENUE IN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 26th day of October, 1992, by the City of Maplewood in Ramsey County, Minnesota, The Municipal Corporation shall hereinafter be called the CITY, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has planned the improvement of SAP 138- 010 -05 (Trunk Highway 61 frontage road) from County Road C to Kohlman Avenue. WHEREAS, the City wi l l be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on. the improvement of this street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED: That the City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on SAP 138 - 010 -05 (Trunk Highway 61 frontage road) from County Road C to Kohlman Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Rossbach 9. Change Order No. 2: Sterling Street, Project 87 -45 A. Mayor Bastian moved approval of Change, Order 2. to charge the cost of this project prior to 1992 be, pai d by allocation of $200.000 of Water Access Charges, St. Paul District funds. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Phalen Stop Signs a. Councilmember Rossbach asked how requests for removal of stop signs, etc. are handled; what about people who want the sign to stay? b. Director of Public Works Haider stated there is no set procedure, but it could possibly be handled with a mass mailing to residents in the affected area. c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to direct staff to investigate a Drocedural plan for handling such regues,_. is . Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 20 10 -26 -92 A Councilmember Jukes moved to waive the Rules of Procedure and extend the meeting until. all items are commeeted. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 2. Commission Appointments a. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct staff to provide Council with. the names of anal i cants for ointment to City Boards and Commissions. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 3. Nayor Update a. Mayor Bastian stated the City's recycl er is looking for materials promoting awareness about recycling. 1) Councilmember Zappa asked about the availability of materials from Ramsey County, and noted this should be discussed at a Council /Manager Meeting. b. Mayor Bastian commented on the Red Ribbon Campaign, addressing concerns about violence, drugs, minorities, guns, child abuse and other social problems. c. Mayor Bastian stated he had spoken with the Metropolitan Council about obtaining Census track data regarding locations for services and school s . d. Mayor Bastian stated the November 7 Mayor's Forum at City Hall will include information regarding the Open Space Committee Report. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Police Consolidation a. Manager McGuire stated a date must be set for an informational meeting regarding the Police Consolidation Study. b. Councilmember Juker moved the informational meeting be held from 6 : 00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. on November 9, 1992, Just before the next Council Meetin4. N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING Meeting adjourned-at 10:42--P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 21 10 -26 -92 AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: November 2, 1992 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 445 Checks # 23760 thru # 23833 Dated 10 -15 -92 thru 10 -30 -92 $ 224 $ 670 PAYROLL $ 207, 894.04 $ 44,051.27 $ 251, 945.31 $ 922 Checks # 18846 thru # 18981 Dated 11 -9 -92 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks # 29089 thru # 29255 dated 10 -23 -92 Payroll Deduction checks # 29260 thru # 29276 dated 10 -23 -92 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. lz Attachments MN"CE/APPRCLM.AGN VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1 III .. .- .... i i / c72 /92 �... _. 11.02 __ ._.. ..... ._ ......... ...... VOUCHER . _ ..... _ . _ /CHECK REGISTER _. __ ... _ ...... _............_. . -, . _ FOR PERIOD 10 3 VOUCHER/ _ _ _ .. ... ._. ._ _....._. ...._........._._.. __ _...., --- _ -_... _.._...___.... _ _._ ..._.._...._..._._._...______.. ..._.____..._.-- .•- _.---- _.___. ___..____ _._..._.... ___.__..____ _ .-- _- _____.__._.__..._..._.�._— _ _ J CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 'AMOUN � 23760 140400 10/15/92 CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE - 126.50 126 , r 1� E T OR, L O R R Al NE VACATION CHECK _._. _.______635-84 5 . I 1 23762 450120 10/15/92 L. M. C. I . T . INSURANCE 34 14 1 ' 23763 31OZ55 10/15/92 GOLF MOUNTAIN ADMISSIONS TO GOLF MOUNTAIN 139.00 139, • -...._ _ 6 2 AIRSI_ CN . AL_,._. - INC.._.. _.__ _._.__.. 4.53 PAGER SERVICE 16. 04 20 23 76 5 541400 ...... 192 STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC F EES PAYABLE _ 21 .. . 5 0 ... ... __...__...._._ ._...._.._....�_._._..2.1.8_».- 237 541400 10 /15/9 2 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 1 .l 1 3,359. 23767 030425 10/1 6/92 ANDERSON, MARGARET M. OVERPAYMENT ON ACCT AMB 82.14 82,,.,1 2 37'6 8 3'02 _ GLENWOOD INGLE W100 D . ' . "'COOLER /EQUIP" RENTAL FOR tJ 23769 722 10/1 PUBLICATION SALES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 33.50 33 , ..j 23770 190400 10/16/92 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 10.00 10. 2 3 7 7..1. __- .—_..1 -9 0 4 0 0 - ._.._. '. 10/ 16192" DEPT* . _ ..O F . NATURAL R E S O U R S E S .. ,....._.... - ... � D N R LICENSE" FEES PAYADLE.... _ --. _...- -.. - - -- _ - --, —_ -. _ -r... -.._ . - -- - - - -- i 6 7 . 0 - -_-- -•-- -- apt 2 23772 5 41400 1 0/16/92 MINN. STATE TREASURE STATE DRIV�_RS LIC FEES PAYADLE .50 23773 541400 10/16/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 12 12,770. 23774 7 i0/ 1'I92 RAINBOW FOODS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 174 ...00 ... .... � _.._-....__. _._..__.._......._.._...7.4.... .t 23775 751200 ._ _.. ___... ._.. _. -.«.. .... _-- ..r... _._ ... ._.. ... _...... ..... _.__.... -r.� _ _._.. .__- __.....__._._.._..___.r.__. 10 r.._r.r._...___.r...__._..._... RICHARDS ......_..... _... ._ ......_........_._.._ ._....._.....r_ «..._..J........ ._._... -.._.0 ... _._._... .. ._.... _.__ PROGRAM SUPPLIES ._... ... -... -. ...... _. .. .._ ... .. .. »_.. _....- _ .. ... ... ..... .. ..__»..._._. r......_. r...... ...___.._......__._ 279,00 ..+.r.r . ..._.._..- .... «.__............. ....._ _ _._...r. Z 79. _.......rr....�. _._.__._.. -.. 23776 510500 10/19/92 MAPLEWOOD BAKERY PROGRAM SUPPLIES 112.64 .)J 112.:, j 237 ..... - 41 400 --- ....0/49192 -MINN:....STA'TE..TREASURER .._. _ ...................... STATE '"DR'I'VERS .. LIC .. FEES PAY ABLE .... ........... ____..__._..._ ._._......._._.. ..... _...._..._...__............ 23778 541400 10/19/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 1 4 9 144.88 14,144. ' 23779 741215 10/20/92 RAMADA TRAVEL & TRAINING 13.00 13. 23780 540900 _ 1 . 0%20/9Z MINN. G.F.O.'A. TRAVEL TRAINING _ .__ 10.00 ., TRAVEL TRAINING 30.00 40. ,� 23TS'i - 5414+60 i0120/92__ MINN.y STATE TREASURER ___. STATE DRIVERS LIG FEES PAYAE:L _.w .:_.__.._.._......_..._... .00 ___....__.._ _-- 1 .._ ...... ___......__._.. .; 0 , 11 1 23782 541400 10/20/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 7 7, 784.E 23783 080475 10/20/92 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHEILD REFUND DUPLICATE AMB PAYMENT 380.00 380, 23784 341703 10120/92 HERD, WILLIAM - G. REFUND —'DUPLICATE AMB PAYMENT *208'00 _ ._. ___...420.00 1 V%iU CH REG CITY is t — ii -F MAPLEW_ .�D PAGE �� , �I .. 2 4 , ^ �• VOUCHER/CHECK REG ISTER uu FO PERIOD 10 << VOUCHER/ .__...�_ _.__._._ _..— __......_____.._._:._._. _.._.._. _. __._.__:_..._ .. - -- ..... .......... __ ._..__. —_ .__..:.._____........_:__.�: __ ::__:.___.- :- . -_ -.. _. z_:__.__ _____._.. _.__: a CHECK V E N D i.+ Ft CHECK V E h! D t. +F' I TEM ITEM CHECK 1 6 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT . ,.. , .. ,..... m ,. ....,. ,. . AMOUN 7 2 3785 ' '�+' 1 t ;+ .��' �) 0 10/21/92 `-' !�: t" RUBBISH T � H R E M I: +UAL V VAS K0 F►U � � .r � RUBBISH REMOVAL 641 164 » 2 3786 5 4 u 8 8 U 10/ 2 1 /92 M INNE S O TA DEFT . O t~ REVENUE ............. . _ D .. . E .. L FUEL _ T A ,, — ._ � D . L _, _ �: x,7;:7 541 400 10/21/92 NN r ST TREASURER � tr_ STATE D R IVERS L = . art . G c.J t t .ri r =. Z:3788 54 1 400 1 Q /Z i / 9Z MINN STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L I C 1 0 � < < , 7d� . r, .� 1 1 1.78 M 2 3 r 8r. f r • rt 17'5 5 1 to I E' 1 E + 9 F' W E Fi U T I L I T I E z, _.___.__ ____— __— ._.___- _ _ _.. _.....__ __ _.__ .. _ _ . ___ _.__._.__ . . . 81072. _ . __._________ .__..__ _._ ---- .._.__._81072 _ _ _ .. 23 790 1404�� t� 1�.� /�:wl�t� CLE O � _ CLE F DISTRICT C CNTY DRIVER LICw � L. w 12 9.0 0 1 .� : -+, .ma _ rr 2 _ t; �. , ,+ e��.� 4 _)i� 4� .-, f d � r 10. / . �.2 f �. ..�NOR G R E F UND RE AM .. - �� : 7 - 70 , ; �.37:r,•�. ��.,��.�� i�if�� /'�>� �' AWARDE C+�hi�;TFtUCTI+�hI � 1, 4 � h ,...,,.�__ ., AWARDED CONSTRUCTION 2 4 8 , 883 . M h! N , T A . E T E A U R E F� �.? ..� � 174 2 5 41 4 010 :10/ 2 MINN, S TA TE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LI 1 1 , 4 11 .ESC) 1 � 411 � :':► 23795 72ZZOO 10/23/92 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE F'ERA DEDUCTION PAYABLE 11120T.98 361 "I f F'ERA CONTRIBUTIONS I TI +NS 14, � N► 4 w 4 �) -- r, 2_ 772 Z3796 541400 Its /Z3/9 MILAN, .'STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 899 899 •' -' `� �.., ? . 7 art) . (' I 1 .. 4 a ,� , _� , ;, 1 D / �. ,. / .. _____._.._, :_.._ .. ... ...... . ...____ .�_ r ,- ......� E .�_____..____.__.____._. D E T . u �• NATURAL f, E �, +_+ U F, ,� 46 2* 798 151275 10/23/92 DATA —CAL CORP. SALES � T F LL U i + AX T F -TAT ...:� . -. _.._..... = a7 _ _._.. -_ _..._ U F' F' L I 0 F F j C E 4 f . 0 Z3 9 9 5 1 0 / Z3/9 2 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOT OR VEH LTC FEES PAY 9 1 T70.50 9 : 23800 341706 10/26/92' HERITAGE BANK F. I . C. A r PAYABLE 9 J� 1 FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYABLE 22 'Al F T C: A C: + l4 T R I L U T .I fV 4, .., _... _. _.._....__ �..'..0 :3 7 . 1 1 098. , 23 � •� i1DD 10/Z6/ MN STATE COMMISSIONER STATE INCOME TAX PAYABLE � 4S 1 , � M 9 1 559 , 23802 943500 10/26/92 WISCONSIN DEPT OF REVENUE STATE INCOME TA PAYABLE .`84 w 12 2 " 23803 5414 - 0 1 �� /�� /w� M I NN . STATE TREASURER.:._.:.... _ -. E t� I E C MOTOR VEH ._ FEES F A YAE LE :..,.. 1,» ►;, 1 i, r+: Y;' 541 400 10/Z6/9Z MI NN . STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS L I G FEES PAYABLE 1911 .5D 00 5 1 1 t 2:3) pia 5 890900 10/26/92 U. S w WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 1 618 w 6 7 TELEPHONE , 7 5 . 41 TELEPHONE _... . 7 5 41 �1J .TELEPHONE T5:41 ( 4 TELEPHONE 7 .41 T E L E F' H �:+ N E -- _ .._ ........_ .... _ _ .._...:_ .. . ... . . : ... ... _.. _ �, �; _, tr 4 i VOUC:HE'EG PAGE �n 2 3 i C:HEC r s _ A I i i U N s q 10 13 14 15 16 CITY OF MAPLE 11/02 �_.�.. - i N E VCWCH5R /C H�Ni �� 1 Gi N E ONE 51.52 �� . W_ 2 1 22 FOR PERIOD V 24 01 N E _ __ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR .27 R NUMBER NUML�ER DATE NAME DES CF 3 2 �� E :13 TELEPH j0 t 5 CMG 34 35 36 37 ONE 71.78 TELEPi ONE ONE 7 5 . 58 � a 39 40 4 Fj N E TELEPl- 142 3NE 50 0°' 43. .14 TELEPH -INE 2 TELEPH ONE �9 . , �:; 48 48 3 l V ___ — TELEPH 1 T r � i50� TELEPH S 1 045 .00 _.. X52 S T O N N V E sJ 1 A C 1 L! - a.. ■ •.! I T ELEFi- r4' ............. - ..................... . TELEP 55 5 TELEPH 7 Z IES 81 . 9 0 TELEPH IES TELEPH 62 IES 6 6 3 64 TELEPH SIO 38,05 TELEPH ...... _...... ._.__�_...._. r __..:...: ....._:......:... ...._ ...._. . T 6 TELEPH - 640,00 646 t P _ A ?A T _ �. �7 TELEPH ., TELEPH TELEPH TELEPH T ELEPH TELEPH TELEPH _ TELEPH TELEPH : TELEPH - ._ .- -- _ . __.: _ -- .. _.....: _ - ------- _.... _ .. __._ _ .. _ . _ . -"TELEPH TELEPH TELEPH TELEPH 23806 640808 14 NETTLETON, MACK ISEP'OSI I NTERE 2380T 66 1T50 10/26/92 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILIT U'TT L I T UTILIT I UTI L I T UTILIT 1; UTILIT UTILIT UTILIT 08 .......! 2 i 10 1012 7/92 MINNESOTA CRIME PREVENTION _.. TRAVEL 23'309 310710 10/27/92 GOPHER STATE ONE—C:ALL, INC. SEPT S 23810 541400 10/27/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE 2 38 11 K4i4DD - MINN. 'STATE TREASURER _ _: _..:. WOOD 10 ........... ........: :. . TEM I TEM t1 I P T _I - itil A t u- T ON ! : ONE 2811.7 38.46 ONE 25.76 ONE 25. PAGE �n 2 3 i C:HEC r s _ A I i i U N s q 10 13 14 15 16 ONE 8.40 19 i N E 1 Gi N E ONE 51.52 �� . W_ 2 1 22 24 01 N E _ __ ONE 58.20 6 CAME !J 8 2 .27 R O 63 30 ONE C, 58 20 3 2 �� E :13 MINE 13NE I ! N j0 t 5 CMG 34 35 36 37 ONE 71.78 38 ONE ONE 7 5 . 58 � a 39 40 4 Fj N E 20 w 80 142 3NE 50 0°' 43. .14 -INE 2 4sl ONE �9 . , �:; 48 48 3 l V ___ — t e.l s J 1 T r � i50� # S PAYABLE : S 1 045 .00 _.. X52 S T O N N V E sJ 1 A C 1 L! - a.. ■ •.! I .1 , 07 ■ .(, r4' IES :3:3 55 5 IE S 7 Z IES 81 . 9 0 X 59 IES r 02 62 IES 6 6 3 64 IES SIO 38,05 1: 057 :.�,• R , A . N ,.. I _ H G �:: � ■ c } c.� 68 �;. � M c RV I C• E 65. 6 DRIVERS L I G FEES PAYABLE - 640,00 646 t P _ A ?A T _ �. �7 *-7► _ � 1 r. T - � � s VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ' - FO R P - � cnEcn vEmuox cwEcx vEmuon ^.E. ITEM cwEcn ` munuER munuER u^/� m*m� AMOUN � 23812 110250 10/27/92 C.W.HOULE INCO AWARDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 99, �— { ! 2 a 1 o 1 TREASURER MOTOR -_ ---' 20 �" "°= ' � 2381* 541400 Z�m I NN ~'Sj T«T�`Tm 23815 73'3 0 4 6Z, 10/28/92 HEALTH EAST EDUCATION TRAVEL TRAINING 80.00 23816 510100 10/28/92 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN, VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS l 1 17 0 . I!v"( 15 j-1-11.1. 10 48 -' �—__ _- —._._-- 1 ° °° ^*� Z3818 070-750 10/28/9Z BERGERON EMT TRAINING PERSONNEL 287.50 2 ST . It Z/ 381 19 701349 10/28/92 PAYETTE EMT TRAINING 54.00 54 . Crl 4-508370 IO/Z?/9Z LAKEWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRAVEL TRAINING 35.00 35 cli. 37� $0 sAu 175 c 4r �� _ 23826 10/29/92 M -...._ TR EA S URER __— .~.~` ,E. L^^ 1' o?4 v3 z' 1 5v* Z3829 74Z,'510 10/29/92 RANDY'S PIZZA, P.RO-G.-R-AM SUPPLIES zz -540 23830 722200 10/30/92 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE LIFE INSURANCE 297.00 2 9 7 . 23832 541400 10/30/92 MINNIN STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC 23833 5414 -_ __ '~ MINN. STATE ..`E.~..`E. ""."" "=" L^" 17,295.01 xr 29n 123827 60 ' - ----- '---'—' C ' ~-~-�~'~`~ ~~~~`' ~E'-~~ES '°" vv ,wv~ ��too **u/ a ------'----------- -- ----� _A_/ HOIST REPAIR, INC. REPAIR m mA zwT/BLoa_ _m anoumoo _ 4 18e*T 010300 11/m9/9 �.p.z. INC, zmc, ' nuPp�%�s ��uo=��wT ^ 7a zm ------ — �ae�� "mTEnzAL -- ------- -- -- o'.�a - ' 8--� �� VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD UCHER /CHECK REGIST FOR PERIOD 10 PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ ....... _.._...... . . .............._......... ......_ ... _ . _.... _. .... _ _...... __ __._._ ......... »........ _.. _.._ .._.... CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR I TEM ITEM CHECK ` 9 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCR IPT ION AMOUNT AMOUN A 18849 020750 11/09/92 ALBRECHT COMPANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 84.50 10 .......... OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS _......_._.....v_..w..__. _ _.. _....� 119.59 . ».._..., w .._ ...._.._.... _... _ ._ ............._.» 154., . »..,._....... » .._ 15550 020800 11/09/92 ALFIERI, JILL PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 25.00 25. ' 1��_ � ��4� �• + --- .. � ... i . �_ . r�� - 7�� ~_ �1NDE•R�O�f FU�Lf �NI NO CO . �ALE�_��A . _ - i .. ., - ,� BO 31 a 24 29 . i 0 A R i� i � L D , D A VID V I �? ... _ .. ... ............. U N I �' O R M � C L O TH � hi G -.. _.._......_.............. ..,.............. », .. »..- ..» ..,,..,..».........w,..._ �. i 9 � 7 ., .._»........»..........._ ,� 1 . »_._ ».___.. -._._ .._.._ _ 1 i 9 , 22 23 0 188-58 060260 11/09/92 B � K AUTO TRIM INC. REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 159,88 _ . _ ._.... -... __._. __ ...__ _. _...... _.._._....._ _ _ UP L I E 9 ... _ - iTEN I LE _- 31941 1 0054 061000 11/09/92 RANI JOHN PROGRAM SUPPL 351 S5 18855 061100 11/09/92 BANNIGAN & KELLY P.A. LEGAL FEES 5 "► 31 LEGAL FEES 393.75 37 LEGAL_FEE: 33 LEGAL FEES 95000 34 3r, LEGAL FEES 190 000 LEGAL FEES 63.75 37 LEGAL FEES 42.50 38 0 LEGAL FEES 85.00 en LEGAL FEES.. A, LEGAL FISCAL 190.00- 41 M 190.00 44 'LEGAL!" BERM GES`w.�id ..05... �, LEGAL & FISCAL 1 LEGAL & FISCAL 42.50 in -- --------- - - - - - - -- - - -- L E GAL -- - F I B'C A.0 _ _ - 2.. 5 49 LEGAL & FISCAL 191.25 " LEGAL & FISCAL 63.75 _ .:............. _.._. _ ......, ._................ ._....._ . LEGAL FISC _�...»._ +. W.�. ..__» LEGAL & FISCAL 21.25 54 LEGAL & FISCAL 255.00 1 6,366. 1 0 18856 061 120 11/09 BARBER CONSTRUCTION OVERLAY OF TRAIL IN NPWD HGTS PARK _ iO 900600 10, 900, o"a 40 O i��7 O6i�50 '�ASSOC., i i /09/� _ . BARYON ASC:Hi�AN .......... IN CONSULTING C. _ FEES s _.._.. _ ...... `� s 18858 061900 11/09/92 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 187.02 SUPPLI —14 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 156.77 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 176.14 rill SUPPL r ES VEH ICL E i. SUPPLIES VEHICLE SUPPLIES 156.77 71 SUPPLIES VEHC:I EL 144 .87 ,; ES - � VEH IC _._ T._._ - • - ___._.__.__..._._____ S :6$ . 18859 061920 11/09/92 BAUMEISTER, LINDA PHOTOGRAPHY & DEV. OF PRINTS 17 .00 7 7• ........ VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE VOUCHER/CHECK. REGISTER�_ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUN 18860 0712 11/09/92 BEST ERUY COIN PROGRAMS 63.89 634A sn 18862 080360 11/09/92 BLEED, SUE PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 18863 081150 11/09/c,,)Z BOHL, JOHN PROGRAM SUPPLIES '35.00 0 18865 101861 11/09/92 BUSINESS CHOISE NETWORK TELEPHONE 33.17 33.1 18866 101910 11/09/92 BUTTERWORTH SUBSCRIPTION$ MEMBERSHIPS 42.06 42* 18868 110425 11/09/92 CAPITOL S.UPPLY CO. SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 41.98 18869 1.104 THERESE CARLSON -- ---- 8^75 ,~^.L ~^^~~""^E 34 x � 1, 8 8 7 1 ..110875, 11/09/92 CATHODIC PROTECTION SERVICES REPAIR MAINT/UTILITY -_-_- '_0~ 18873 120450 11/09/92 CENTER FOR EXERCISE HEALTH EXERCISE PARTICIPATION 54.00 EXERCISE PARTICIPATION 18875 130800 11/09/92 CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN PROPERTY RENTAL Z65.,00 Z65.4, 18876 131150 11/09/92 CHIRHART SANDRA PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 10.50 10. 11.5 1 1 Iti 11/09/92 COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS REPAIR MAINT/EQUIPMENT 690,00 18879 152280 11/09/92 COPPERLAND ARTS CRAFTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 7.83 7. 18880 -1523*00 11109/92 ''COPY DUPLICATING PROD* DUPLICATING COSTS $9 , SUPPLIES OFFICE 127.80 5Z6.Q • Vn .HR _UC EG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE R 7 % 11 / 0 2 / 9 2 i •1 : � 2 VOUCHER/CHECK �t E G I S T E R _ . ._ _ .... _ . _.__......_ .._ __..._____....— . _ .. ...._. FOR PERIOD 10 VOUCHER/ _ .... _.. ...... .... .... _. ... _ ......_ _... ......._..__....._._....._ R CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 1 0 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUN n SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 18582 ... 1801io 11/09/92 D.0 «A. .-.. - - Nf . ONT. R U AL -S R�l ___..:,ICS _..._-- .........4.......�... _..2;102. 1 "Z•,.. 1888-3 180180 11/09/92 DAHL ASSOCIATES PURCHASE OF SMALL TANKS 738.67 18884 180860 11/09/92 DALEN, CINDY PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 25,00 25, ;, i 1555! 9 116 9192 DAY_ -T EkJ, INN Iii SUF'PL ES OFF IC:E I - 18.96 i 18886 190125 it/09/92 DEMCO PROGRAM SUPPLIES 90.6T 90.61 S 2r, 18887 230675 11/09/92 EAST SIDE CARQUEST SUPPLIES - VEHIC 1 95,54 .. . ... - I..._.._..._ ......... _.__ _._ ....._ . _....... ....._.... .................... __ ..................... SUPPLIES - VEHICLE __ _. ..__ _ .... _.y_...___ , .... _.. � 69.15 W.. � .._ w__ ..� _ ._ ._�.� . _ . _... _._... _ _ r .Wr 264. .W _.__� __...___...�......._......_ ....W.._ �� 188E+8 231500 11/09/92 EDEN SYSTEMS INC. MODIFY CHECK PRINT PROGRAM 382.50 382..4 WN LAWN TREATMENT 52054 251. INC .. ... S O F P L � E j E � � I �' M E I� T .._..._... W a. ____...._......W.: W . ........._.... W..... . �.._... �.....__.........._..w._....� �_. �_ .� _... ..._...�...._.,..._.._.._..._. �.� � 18891 270250 11/09/42 FLEET TECH SERVICE CORP, REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 18 18 1 8892 280080 it/09/92 EORSMAN, ELAINE PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 18100 18, 14 1�,,�......0�!� - .__... 1'l0+�2 G !', SE UNIF_RMS . fie. L OTFIING ......,...,_.,............,...... W_ �w_...., w,..._. WU....... ��. W._._.. W_.,. 8.. w,...........,,....__.......... .........__.- ..,__..,...._...8: t, 4 7 , -t( 188 94 301060 11/09/92 GALLIGHER, PATRICIA PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 2 5 r 00 G. E 2 5 . t. 18895 301240 11/09/92 CARRY, WILLIAM UNIFORMS CLOTHING 20 204 5 It /09/92 'GEORGE'S P SHOP AEPA I 4 -1 ' MAl NTJVEHTCI -E......_......�___..W_ _. �.._.-.. W.... a_ ti.. w.. W.._........._ ................. .. pQ..._......_.....__........ 449": W r,4 18897 310300 11/00/92 GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY REPAIR MAINT /VEHICLE 102.66 10 2, 4 i8O98 :10400 1 1/09/92 GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 175.00 MA 18 8 , 9 9 8 10 A O i 1 / �a 9 9 2 G O � H E R D x S P �l .SAL ...R E C Y C L I. N .. G ..........._......... _ ................... ..._.._.._.. _ .... . __......... _.......__ . _� r ... _.__. _W .. _.._ .. L ! . - - : '� ........_. 18900 320290 11/09/92 GRAYBOW- DANIELS CO. SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 7.63 18901 330030 11/09/92 H & L MESABI INC. SUPPLIES VEHICLE 1!2,83 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE ............ . ... ... .._..... .................. .._......_.._ 152.83 .._...... _..._....... _.__._....... .. ..... ........_......._ .........__...- - __ 305« ...._._._.. _ _ _ __.�.. _......__........__ ; F,, 18902 33c,255 11/09/92 HA NSCiN, JERRY PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 15.00 15. ' 1 8903 350879 '"11109/92 HOHENSTEI N GARY _ _.. __ PROGRAM' REG "ISTRA•TT-0N* FEES , 0 1 8904 3700 11/09/92 HUDSON MAP COMPANY BOOKS 74.60 74 • to VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEW+�OD Ii( _ ._.- ._.. 11/02/ z -- ._ ..__.__.. -.._ ._._..._.w _ _ _ _..___..�_,.._._.., _ _._...._. -_ ._... __.,___.__.._....__...- 1.1.�a . ..._._ ........................_..__._ .__,.._ .. _............ -_ -.. _...._., .- .. V0..UC�HER /CHECK REG _ . _._._ ISTER PAGE I 8 FOR PERIOD 10 CHECK V E N D �� R CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECf::. NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUN � 1 8905 370076, 11/0? H UGHES COtST PROSECUTION SERVICES 4, 500.00 4 5OO . 18906 400735 11/09/92 JWR INFORMAT IUN SYSTEMS, TELEPHONE 6 50 .76 650. 16 � 4 ' 18907 400955 11/09/92 JECHOREK , JERRY RE — DUPLICATE PA F D ILATE UTILITY YMNT 43.23 43 21'� l,� 18908 410250 11/09/ 92 K MART PROGRAM SUPPLIES 59. 73 5- »?C• F -- _._ _ .�� .. __ .. -- _ -� _ 1 � •,'� ra � �• �: is � D u 1 1 / ca �+ ! �a � f4: M h� D A R L E E hl L E ! ;_ . _ ^__ PROGRAM FiEGI.:,TFiATx_ ON FEE_ , ______ ._ _____:� _ -_ _ ,;- �.Dt � _ ._.__ ____..___.____.__ -__� y _ - -_ -- 20.( 1891 430800 11 /09/92 f<:OKESH ATHLETIC: PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1 34 . 9 5 r 1891.1 430815 11/09 f OLSTAD COMPANY, INC. KOLSTAD COMPANY, INC. 467.3Z 4 6 7 z5I � AL .4'T ' _ 18912 4600-6f f1 V - 9 - /9Z LEFEGV RICHARD �' Fi . �� .. G R_A_M_ .. RE GI`STRATI�a . N FEES 7.0 ?. 18913 461215 11/09/92 LETN TRAVEL TRAINING 488.00 488. C- 1891 490800 11/09/9Z LYONS SAFETY SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT _ 9 . ZZ 9 , 33 136 9 15 5 to c i 515 1 1/ 0/ 9 2 M N A S E CF E T A R Y - - S U B S C R IR T I O N S � MEMBERSHIPS 60. , -L l:: 0.0 0 1 r�'a l 15 50 �c� 11 !0'af'�� MA IER STEWA T � A C. R ASSOC. OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE - 9 •, �. � 18917 1 1 Gt 11/09/92 MARUSKA ! MARK UNIFORMS CLOTHING e0 41I E - C.) U I f-At N'T is F F - I _C: s .� , c 0 0 . t� t .._.� _� _ __. ,.. w � � . 140 41 18919 530 11 MENARDS SUPPLIES - OFFICE 8.22 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL �Z85. 4u1 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL.- 59.33 394. 1O�'' 0 F tic 7i 11/0' 'fit METRO+ AREA MANAGEMENT ASSN TRAVE k AT N NG a7 11.00 1 514 18921 531 300 11/09/92 METRO INSPECTION SERVICE ... ...... . .... INSPECTIONS . ........ . ....... 3 952 r 00 r. �- 52 c ` w � M r 1'83 ZZ � 5400 0 ,... r 11 /D;� /9Z M IDLAND NURSERY LAND IMPROVEMENT 150.00 J/ LAND IMPROVEMENT 150.00 300 13923 540Z75 11/09/92 MIDWEST CHILDRENS VIDEO TAPE INTERVIEW ';:0 zo .c. t' 0 11 / -2. MIN ES,1TA TRUCKING ASS C . SUPPLIES ' VEHICLE _ 1S•,� ",�,� _.w1�`� �,��'�i 1 8925 551351 11/09/9Z MN PLANNING ASSOCIATI BOOKS zt 00 z0 13926 570050 11/09/92 MO BILE EMERGENCY SYSTEMS, I NC. REPAIR MA INT /VEHI 131.00 131. c " "' t,ul U L 1 570520 - '11 l09 �. ,. MOtTOR MAGAZINE ' BOOKS __. 34.00 4 _ ._._.. 1 8928 4.40807 11/0919Z NERUD, DAM P ROGRAM REGISTR FEES 20 .00 2 C�" VOUC:HREC CITY OF MAPLE1 OOD ti� i i _ . _.. — —... _... _ .. r 9;z V�rU:NER /CHEC�ti REIST , FOR PERIOD 10 2 �4 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK � NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AhliiUhiT AhIO 1 8 929 660075 11/09/92 NORTH ST PAUL CITY OF UTILITIES 2 y 407010 0 y 40T y f) 0 1 '::1 C1 /; r�, � Z 7 �' I � I c. / �� _ . "S 'T , �' A U L N AP L E N � 0 D R a T A R Y P R � C� �t A l+� � U R PLIES _.. _ .__.:. _ � .� �:.�:::__�.._T__:.:. _: :.. ��___ ;, .___ .._ w _� . � � . �._�..� .�...r .. , -- . -_ _. _ �_,. -_- 14 • 18931 660800 11/09/92 NO ST. PAUL CITY OF UTILITIES 140.92 ' 1 IJT`IL IT TES...' „ 1 89.3; 661 17.5 11/09/92 NO RTHERN AIR CORP R EPAIRS M TNCE. /GLDGS O �� . �� Qtr « . . 1 661.750 11/09/92 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 837.47 22 � UTILITIES 7 289 .01 23 lJ T I L ITTE S 25 UTILITIES 1 40 26 UTILITIE 27 U71 L I - T . I E ` . �� t,� 29 UTILITIES :37.79 30 UTILITIES _ 270.14 31 � ----- - -.__ . __._ -.___ _ _._ _�_ _.___ _ _---- __. - -- __. _ _ _ _�_________._.. _..___ _..__ _.._.... _ ._. ..__ . - - �r i , ZZ F4 UTILITIES 1D 34 UTILITIES 16 91 UTIL ITI 37 UTILITIES 4.47 38 39 UTILITIES 3.14 40 UTILIT - IE - - -- 11 - 14 41 : UTILITIE 14 42 �., 43 • UTILITIES 101 00 - :. - - - -- - -_.. -- ;� -- --_.___...._ ._�..__�.wu_..y...__...._�_ -.�, _....�.��.__... y.....u- „ � LL..,�...._.�.....�. y..... w�... �,_. �_. W..- ..._...4.r.�w.�_.....�y..y..�. L I T LE 45 ,_,7 UT? �1. UTILITIES 9 75 46 47 • UTILITIES 0.1 48 {J'T I L I T I E ^ _ i 49 UTILITIES 94 6'3 � 50 UTILITIES 1ST 5i UTILITIES 140.43 54 n UTILITIES 121.FF 55 � 56 L _ 57 ( UTILITIES 976:1 58 � UTILITIES 1 »1 5 0 UTIL_I_T S" 60 UTILITIES 146.15 62 i UTILITIES 141.18 63 UTZ L I T I E - 1 -1-5 710 _. -_�_ 6 UTILITIES 16 .41 66 (' s UTILITIES 7 .03 67 1 . U T I L I T I E S 97 _._. _...__....._..__._._.__.. __... _ .__._` . -_.. 69 f UTILITIES :394.33 '76 � UTILITIES 79.59 71 72 s U'T 73 UTILITIES Cy..: {?' r � _. UTILITIES 47 0': r. - UT 'ILI'T'IES" ,:,�7. VOUCHREG ViiUC:HEF�/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE 18934 4.6.179 11/09/92 189 661820 1 1 /0 9/9 CITY OF MAPLEN��OD , 0 _ .._.._.... PAGE ' U VOU QHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PER IOD 10 z � s J VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK i NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUN 8 NORTHERN WHOLESALE SUP PLY, 1 NC . SUPPL - .JANITORIAL 23 138 , u SUPPLIES — EQUIPMENT 6,07 Z9. 13 NORTHLAND REFRIGERATION REPAIR & FAINT /BLDG & GROUND[ 814.:7 R 1 4 - _l.& 18'� 3 7(0 `35 11/09/92 PAL MA, STEVEN T TRAVEL �� fi€�ATHIi�iG 18937�W 70 11/ 09/92, PA ULO $ rFAUL_Jf _---_ - TRAVEL TRAI NING 14 ' . 1 40 ��' 11 . 18938 710600 11/09/99 PEOPLES ELECTRIC BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 160.00 22 GUILDING IMPROVEMENT 240i00 400 . (�14 18939 T 11375 11 /09/9Z RET R IE, LAR PROGRAM REGIST RATION FEES 15.00 �.� . 4�� ;,► 1� 1 15 1 Lj , • 30 1 8941 720460 11/09/92 F'OL I ACH I K , J EANNE PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 25.00 � c' r` • • s 18942 7 » o 11/09/9z ' IN C11.,LE, JOHh PROGRAM REGISTRAT FEES .O . C)O 20 ?;fc7h�F I 1 /D'f� / - F'REF ERRED RIf =: {_NS �UL.TAIWT FEES - CONSULTING �_� ___.�._ -17' U �1 7�M - ,, 18 740500 11/09/92 R. L. FOLK CO. BOOK 18945 74 1 ZOO I t /09 /9Z RAINBOW FOODS PROGRAM SURRL I EO 44 .7;.� 460 FAN,;,EY_CL INlI_CG ___ FFiE -FLACE EIVT __F'HY _I 18947 741330 11/09/92 RAMSEY COUNTY DATA PROCESSING CHARGE[ SEPT 1'x.17 RATA F'ROC.E %GI CrHARGES__ SEPT 1: :, _ 48 49 DATA PROCESSING CHARGES SEPT 7�..06 : 105.' 1 �_ 18949 7 11/09/9Z ROADRUNNER COURIER DERV . E 24.90 i 189,9) 761 304 _......_ _._ __ 11/09/92 ..�..__. ROB I Na, K APLAN I MI LL.ER &C IRES I TRAVEL. TRA - INN 5 t1DD . C)Ci 000 � 1 _ _ I N G .._ -_ _ _____ ___�._.....____ U F F L I E �► - F F' I C E .. _.__------ ._.___._ __.._,...._.__ __.__ ___..�_..._.____._.._._.___.___ _ 5 . • 6 � 6:1 18952 780402 11 /09/92 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS . PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1 =; �:� 1 i ) PROGRAM SUPPLIES .. _ __ ... ,, .� e PROGRAM SUPPLIES 101 Z Oki `', P'R��GRAI� SUPPLIES SUPPLIES -- OFFICE 1z 45 :u SUPPLIES — OFFICE SUPPLI EQUIPMENT ._... SUPPLIES -- OFFICE _ _ 14.151 � �, 1 1 C . o , �:�� 7 r1�a�. 11 f��:�/ ' C:HULTL; HAR +aLD F'Rf-'IGRA'M REG 15m 0 o _. _______ ._._ - 1 5 " u - 0 0 I ,0 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLE PAGE 1 I Cy I` �� IT i w t� VOUGHEiICHE :ti �tEGSTE �,! FOR PERIOD 10 _. sf VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK: VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT' 18954 Ct00257 11/09/92 SEMERAU, ELLEN PROGRAM REG ISTRATION FEES 7 oo 7 1 8- -55� '_ 1 0 5 11 f 0 /';i SHERW0 b CCR Rr -Ihl P 9` RAhri Fi Tt�ATI �.�� 25.0 18956 18'9 83 11/ 09/92 SP , r— ., O FFICE PRODUCTS ,SUPPLIES — OFFICE 13.04- SUPPLIES - O FF ICE 66.62 1t3 S UPPLIES .. O FFICE 6.31 �o' _.._ ............._.y. ....._............ ....- ...__._.._. . ..... .. ._.. _ _._ _ _ - �__ -- - -- ��. _._..._ _w._ u_..y .�....,... _ .._ .._..__...__ SU PPLIES - OFFICE 15.95 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 9.62 ' � SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.28 23 z a E UPPL ESQ rFP C �__,. M. S �5 SUPPLIES OFFICE X1.60 175. 7 18::57 S4i ' 7 1 1 /ca = �.. /'?' ST'. JOHhl S HiISPITAL. CaP1 E��: aF - FtEC �i'I} 8.00 ( a 18958 8403 �:� 1 1 /t` 9 / 2 ST . PAUL, CITY OF OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE; M�3 . 66 3? OUTS I DE ERG - 1 NEER IN . FEES 33 066 — 33 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 149«30 3 ` 1 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 85 . 98 3s 3s %i U `1" o I D E E N GI N E E..R' .1 N G E EE ::, , c�, 37 O UTSIDE ENGINEERING FEE 68. 38 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 157.27 . 40 � _ �1a OUTS ENGINEER FEES 1 iaTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1 0. . 40 41 - ..._.. _ ..__.- W...._..._ .... ._____._. _ u, _..y.W....w..,._ ..,W_.�_..�...._., u TS- .. �. 4 O THER C ON RUCTI C 0 S, 67 X00 �.4,, REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO 124.50 46 REPAIR & MAINT /RADIO 170.70 47 � ate cut StJLTTRT. �; ;,�� REPAIR MAI /UTILITY 402 824 so 'i1 • UTILITIES I - :-T3.5 5� - - _ - ...... .. ......... W_. .......... -.._._ �_.._ -.__ y .W_ ...._._..__ .�. _ . ..... ._ ... _..� .___ _.__........._.._. UT1LI OU TSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 5 1.80 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 15 5 . 40 � OUT.., rD E - . r - NG I'NEE'R"ING F � OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 0 «:.4: 18 0 5 o t7UTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 955 i . 0 U'1` 8 I 1) E F EES in OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES :33.40 � OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 84.71 63� � 6 4 U UT I E hiG ITI E E I - NG FE r OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES ,_06 . 71 cs. „� 67 OUT ENG I VEER I NGi TEES • _,6 .0.3 �g 0UTSIDE ENGINEERI - NG FEES , 1�:�7. O 1 ,Y3 i 1 E -'959 840400 11 /09 /92 ST .PAUL PAUL CITY OF _.... -._ OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES -- - - 809.14 - _ _. . ;:, OUTSIDE ENGINEERING O, 1.15..07 74 � �5 O UTSIDE - ENGINEERING 441 ' "'�' - �; 6 i_i TNE R C N STRUCTI.._.:H_. 1_! �•; = .rcici .. .... .1_i t_! 7-A 18962 851575 11/09/92 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE V 0 U.C_HR_ EG 136. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 7 —8- '6 0 100 PAGE 2 .... .... ..... " TER ------ 18 86-0302 11/09/9Z T. J, AUTO PARTS FOR PER TOD 10 VE-HICLE 94 -.40 96$1 18965 860650 11/09/92 TARGET STORES—CPC, A/R SUPPLIES — JANITORIAL VOUCH CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION .......... ....... ...... ......... .......... ...... AMOUNT AMOUN1 7 18966 8807.50 OTHER CONSTRUCTION Z84..28 10 -JANITORIAL SG .21 ' OTHER CONSTRUCTION S'UPP L I E S' OT'HE'RCONS'TRUCT ION' 13 OTHER CONSTRUCTION 1 ZZ 407.`t 1 5 ' __842'_10 F89 6 0 ''1 /09 9 0 1""' - - Z' STANDAR - 'S P R I N G A L 16 N M E N T ......... .. . MA ' INTVEH1CL 77' 4_Q..'.5_'___ 5 24. cht") 18961 84:3ZOO 11/09/9Z STEFFEN SCOTT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35-00 '35 18962 851575 11/09/92 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE 136.54 136. fl 7 —8- '6 0 100 66.51 PARTS' 15 .09 ------ 18 86-0302 11/09/9Z T. J, AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES VE-HICLE 94 -.40 96$1 18965 860650 11/09/92 TARGET STORES—CPC, A/R SUPPLIES — JANITORIAL 46.33 SUPPLIES — EQUIPMENT 22.60 ......... .. . ...... SUPPLIES' -OFF I C E 7 .17 0 18966 8807.50 11/09/9Z TROY CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES SUPPLIE,S -JANITORIAL SG .21 ' S'UPP L I E S' 18967 881320 11/09/92 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT AND REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 20 . 00 . C3 all 18968. 51 8Z800 11/09/9Z TWIN CITY TRANSPORT TOW 21.30 18969 890225 11/09/92 U. S. WEST REPAIR SERVICE WIRE ....... ... ... ... ......... 60.00 60 81 .............. .. . ........ ..... ------ ....... ..... 18970 890600* 111091927 U,H,L, INC* SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 104.59 104. pq 7 9(o u 18973 'U.3 —.13 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 99.63 UNIFORM CLOTHING 66.51 ....... --- ..... . UNIFORMS _G . . . ...... UNIFORMS 15 .09 ,� UNIFORMS CLOTHING 170 .86 _U 'N I F 0 R M cu-;- L 0 TH__1 N G_ . ?-0-0 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 101 .52 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 170.16 'UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 118'11 2 6 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 84.51 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 325.05 ----- ----- FOR MS-8.* "CLOTH IN_G___-- ----- - ------ jz 18972 900170 11/09/92 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY REPAIR MAINT UTILITY 18973 910050 11/09/9Z VoW,EIMICKE A,-SSCICIATES SUPPLIES w OFFICE Ll] 9. 00 90 3 VASKO'' RUBBISH REMOVAL RU'f31E-fI_S`H ''REMi--IVAL 329mog VOUCHREG CITY OF MAF'LEWOOD PAGE '` 3 , 11/0 11 » 1� i R,! H E I : H E t: k: R E* *I ST T E R � FOR PERIOD 10 v R/ .. 5 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 7 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUN 8 s RUE- *4ISH REMOVAL . 231 560 ^,,� .. F ..- 18 7•� — ...,_ i _ �+f,c�.± , ,�:_ .............. 11 /��r I.• � .. �;.. MAF� _, - TY VERHUL�,T, PROGRAM REGISTRATION - FEES Lea ... iii •, c !� 18976 X111700 11 /09/92 S PECIALTY VIKING SPECIALTY PROGRAM S � .0 . 12 t,� 604. „�, 189TT ►. �:• 2- .��.t..�0 11 /D9 /r 7 GAGERS INIC. SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 152 .08 15 1 -=� �'� ._..� =� F ... 1.0 ALDC +F� F'L�hIF' U MAII�ITEIUAIC:E 1+ATEF�IAL�w - .77 v ii y o ; 6 18979 943200 11/09/92 GI SEMAN 9 DAVE PROGRAM REGISTR FE ES 15.00 15 .0 _ 2 ''1 18980 970650 11 /0 /02 YOCH LYNNE PROGRAM REGISTRA PEES z3..00 � ' 2 i 1 89 9 T .. 0700 11 /09/92 YUGUM 0 1 L C0-a MAINTENANCE MATEFcIAL 1 8 .00 FUEL O IL 2 29 .4 6 11 3 1 FUEL OIL 4 1 9 01 .03 5 9 14 8. 33 3- TOTAL CHECKS 670 3'1 33 39 -10 Al 4 43 45 46 -t7 AR Q 51 S1I d CA riff 60 :1 _...._...... ._..- . _ _... ._ ... ........... _. — 67 _ .. .. _..... .—. _ ....... .._ _..........._ ..... ... . .. .... ...... ......... ........... . ., . _. _ _ _ 70 +� 71 72 73 7 , 1 75 . .... ..... _ .................... ... ......... .._. .._..._......:.. _... .. . ...... ..... _ ...... . _ ....— ....__ ._.._._ __. ..._... __._. ....._ ... }If • • • • • • IE 36 0029105 10/23/92 LINDA ZICK 912,v 50 23/92 0029106 1012 DEBORAH DEHN - :Aol ..... V/t R 4 r0-5- - 1411 9 10 8 10/23/92 ALANA MATHEYS 1 152i CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 000 1 10/23/92: DELORES A VIGNALO EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS 4 7 10/23/92 BETTY D SELVOG FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD '6i UMBE 3 4 00 9 2-p jCroE 4 0029C 10/23/92 DALE CARLSON -7n63 7 '':.:0029091. 10/23/92- GEORGE ROSSBACH 2670.63 tg--- 2! 0029093 10/23/ 92 FRANCE ES L JUKER 2 113' .0029094 10/23/92 MICHAEL A McGUIRE. 3o,286m22 F,71 -V5 -THE RESE-- CAR LSO N- 1- 1R. 071-0— ' 0029096 10/23/92 GAIL BLACKSTONE 2, 036,93 002-9097 10/23/92 GRETCHEN MAGLICH 1 7`52a 39 a ;22; I f%Cxt 2t,3 -t 9 2 3 0029099 10/23/92 DAVID J JAHN 1 a j 056m 6n 2 51 0029 100 LYLE SWANSON 1 i271, L f4 Rt R Y -CUDE' 0029102 10/23/92 ANDREA J OSTER 1 0029 103. 10/23/92 WILLIAM MIKISKA. 185m 63 34! • • • • • • IE 36 0029105 10/23/92 LINDA ZICK 912,v 50 23/92 0029106 1012 DEBORAH DEHN - :Aol ..... V/t R 4 r0-5- - 1411 9 10 8 10/23/92 ALANA MATHEYS 1 152i 0029109: 10/23/92: DELORES A VIGNALO 1 2294 30: 4 7 10/23/92 BETTY D SELVOG 217,38 0029111 10/23/92 BRUCE ANDERSON 1 040, 5'.l ,0, 002-9112 10/23/92 CAROLE J ANDERSON 559,22 152i :54 0029114 ;i :I 10/23/92 BETTY D SELVOG 217,38 PATRICIA FRY 0029115 10/23/92' 647,87 10 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 000Q EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD --NtnTSE-R - --L'HECK---DATE.D -PR-'iEE- --6--- 2 ---LTI-S—BEH ----------- - 0029117 10/23/92 CONNIE L KELSEY 818,w 47 10123/92 LORRAINE S VIETOR 3 --P-AT RT C-I Pf-- Fr- HE NSL 1, 121 x 3(.-) I I 054,v 89 1, 093, 60 793-1- -65 2 359. 94 1 32 83 68�5m 01 1 1 --a,- 5 6 034, 46 3 2( I u; ROBERT D NELSON - - - -- - - - - - - iR 034,9 4 3 ! 34 1 2 0029120 ! 10/23/92 CAROL JAGOE 13> of-29132 10/23/92 DONALD W SKALMAN 1 802,v 10 �:O()2'9133, 10/23/92 RAYMOND J MORELLI JEANETTE E CARLE 91 SccyTT !40i 3 .. _- - °---..__._ .. SANDRPF-OL 142 0029135 10/23/92 DAVID L ARNOLD b-k*)2,w 10 '0029123 10/23/92 MARY KAY PALANK i 9 0/23/92. JOHN J BANICK 1, 9470 1 - 5 1 45i 461 0 2 9 1 37' OHN 10/23/92 KENNEIH V COLLINS 2 1 oc)29 1,36 DALE K CLAUSON 2 Z�9 1 5 002 9 1.39+ _�i.� RL O R IC H AR D ML M OESCHI TER 2 .3 1 51 At tj 531 0029126 10/23/92 JOANNE M SVENDSEN r4 l 0029141 2,11 JAMES YOUNGRE-N l 5 CZ 00 29 JL42 10 2 3 92-1 WILLIAML F- PELT 0029127 ELAINE FULLER 1571' 27, ! 281 L i29 i 30' 0029129 10/23/92 ANTHONY G CAHANES 1, 121 x 3(.-) I I 054,v 89 1, 093, 60 793-1- -65 2 359. 94 1 32 83 68�5m 01 1 1 --a,- 5 6 034, 46 3 2( ROBERT D NELSON - - - -- - - - - - - iR 034,9 4 3 ! 34 1 :35i of-29132 10/23/92 DONALD W SKALMAN 1 802,v 10 �:O()2'9133, 10/23/92 RAYMOND J MORELLI 1 91 SccyTT !40i 141 142 0029135 10/23/92 DAVID L ARNOLD b-k*)2,w 10 4 3c 002-19136 0/23/92. JOHN J BANICK 1, 9470 1 - 5 1 45i 461 0 2 9 1 37' OHN ID oc)29 1,36 10/23/92 DALE K CLAUSON 1 546, 87 002 9 1.39+ 0/23/92 R IC H AR D ML M OESCHI TER lu 33,41. 51 At tj 531 r4 l 0029141 10/23/92 JAMES YOUNGRE-N l 5 CZ 00 29 JL42 10 2 3 92-1 WILLIAML F- PELT I, ac)2* 10 1571' u� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0»003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ' FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD HnuuN.I~� 1,586.ZS1 0029 1 47 10/23/92 RICHARD J LANG ww ... 10/23/92 DALE RAZSKAZOFF 0029144 10/23/92 THOMAS J SZCZEPANSKI m� i u � | nm ----' — -- --' '— HnuuN.I~� 1,586.ZS1 0029 1 47 10/23/92 RICHARD J LANG 1 3698 11 ... 10/23/92 DALE RAZSKAZOFF 0029 1 MICHAEL J HERBERT 1 A* 0029153 10/23/92 RONALD D BECKER 1, 729, 48 029 15 4 10/23/92 KEVIN R�HALWEG 2, 206X 616 1 291 40 '1 1 0029 156 10/23/92 PAUL G PAULOS—JR. 1 684. 65 40 ;1 0029 159 10 23 92 STEPHEN J HEINZ 13 i Pi i AF 4 1 i 0029162 10/23/92 DAVID J THOMALLA 1 744w 30 0025163 10/23/92 STEVEN PALMr4 1, 662a 70 40 .. 1481 0029 165 10/23/9-2 JOSEPH A BERGERON 1, 669, 27 0,029166 JOL/23/92 JAMES MEEHAN 1, 0029168 10/23/92 SARAH SAUNDERS 1 044. 02 ` ' 1 0123/ 92 ^ ' ~~_- ~~' ` ~ ' 74 70 , _' � r] CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD L 0029174 10/23/92 CAROL NELSON 10/23/92 KENNETH G HAIDER Le EUK NUM ER. 0029181: 10/23/92 JUDY M CHLEBECK 0029177 10/23/92 SHAWN THOLEN 0029189 10/23/92 0029171 10/23/92 JANET L RABINE GnE: 0029183 10/23/92 GERALD W MEYER 1:0/23/92 MICHAEL R KAI' 10/23/92 L 0029174 10/23/92 CAROL NELSON 10/23/92 KENNETH G HAIDER JAMES DARST 0029181: 10/23/92 JUDY M CHLEBECK 0029177 10/23/92 SHAWN THOLEN 0029189 10/23/92 JOHN SCHMOOCK I t 0� _ GnE: 0029183 10/23/92 WILLIAM C CASS 1 900, 50 0029 180 10/23/92 KENNETH G HAIDER JAMES DARST 0029181: 10/23/92 JUDY M CHLEBECK 54i 0029189 10/23/92 JOHN SCHMOOCK I t 0� _ 77 0029183 10/23/92 GERALD W MEYER 1:0/23/92 MICHAEL R KAI' ' 0029192 10/23/92 V� 1 245m30 - : �61 0029186 10/23/92 DAVID P LUTZ 1,935.18 ---------- 138.25 1,249.44 2,359.94 1,307.30 ' 1 ` 1 ., 10/23/92 WILLIAM C CASS 1 900, 50 UN (3 9 16 7: 10/23/92 JAMES DARST 41 i 54i 0029189 10/23/92 JOHN SCHMOOCK 1 0� _ 77 ��4r�. 30 ' ` ' 0029192 10/23/92 RONALD L FREBERG 1 245m30 ., 10/23/92 WILLIAM C CASS 1 900, 50 n 54i 0029195 10/23/92 JAMES G ELIAS 1 482, 10 i 77 ~~ ^' ' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD | EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ___ __ CURRENT PAY __ 1,743.68 ^ 1 ----1.� ' m^ 0029201 �O� THE CUR��NT PAY PERIOD � 0 * . ' ' - �1�27 -- it �r 0029198 10/23/92 WILLIAM PRIEBE 10/23/92 BARBARA A KRUMME* 5: 4, 98 u; BRUCE A IRISH w '~� oo zo/2 31 3� 2 33 0029207 10/23/92 MARGARET KUNDE 123, 75 1,743.68 ^ 1 ----1.� ' m^ 0029201 10/23/92 THERESA METZ 1. 537m -9 0 'w" [ .` ' ' - �1�27 -- it �r 0029205-: 10/23/92 BARBARA A KRUMME* 5: 4, 98 u; 2 33 0029207 10/23/92 MARGARET KUNDE 123, 75 0 )29208 10/23/92 ROBERT S ANDERSON 1, 22' 1, 66 .°~ �mr 002921 10/23/92 WILLIAM GARRY 00292 11. 1, 245,w 30 MARUSKA- bi 0029213 10/23/92 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER e� "2:9215 i 05 f2_3 tlR2 10/2%.S SHANNON MILLER 72.90 148 0029219 10/23/92 SANDRA LEARNED 166". 25 1 2 220 .10/23/92 MICHAEL COLV 132. 00 1 3 0029222 10/23/92 SHANNON Sl TEINBRING j"+7. 51- 0029223. 10/23/92 MELISSA STEINBRING 36, Of' ' ' `M' .a '4�zhr.�� '' M,[..•t �i4 �� .:;j�j -�� r�`M' �' .t �:� ...�': -, :. ... :�.'�'. y;`_. .L '•+'s��t� -` ��' e.a � • �a.. rri!:,..`{:' f��Ya' t, ityl a+ i+ SSSk"'. 4.:. Vm-+ �Ttd.. sa. k^- ':ti'��'+rss�CsuxJri:�ts'N14t3 f EMP GROSS EA I NGS AND PAY ROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD �1 , t 0 9225 1 0/23/ 9 2 E R I CK LA # }' ALA 3 2 w � RACHEL ERSFELD 42. 00 .. ,.. 1 ,.. {» .�- 1M. TS � X12; 0029228 10/23/92 ROY G WARD 419m 02 0029229 1 0 / Lam. 3 .±fi ..f k.» D O U GL» A S J T A U B !' } A N 14, 531, 7 f ti.� •� � •» L � 1. r �? �» �.�~ L � ! ..J �.... ._,..— .�____._._.:.._._. ';`i"'! ��1.... � T _ �i _._ ti..? i i 1... YY __.._�_� t F t' f 1"f �� -:.__ -___. _._....__ V .._....._��._._,;. ..__. _- ...._.__ .. _ ._ - -- -- - -.. _ .... -_ _ _. __ .....l..i � � � f' p -} s �J i 3 ` 002923 R •'` �� t JE AN # f �i L.t '�i 5 j w L mo w. { 10/2 s tom+ j�''j ( t (w�..■ J O �. f N N A • t �� B I L L• !� 1124 � ») o i 2 21 i t '�'� �.» w �.i a..,f Z4 0 029234 1 ANN HU � Cat .I #'��u�� 1 � 3. ��. '��.:j t 1 26 1 •••.� 9 2 j �i`» . (0 R `� ,` / 9 2 - L • + + 'f E 1 T.� • R iw) 1 - t�.+` 21 ` Of w » if : d S..� Lr/ r_ `'� t • 1 d f� - j�' . f � �7«w i + .irf 1.�J � f ^- -+� ..StMr -. 130 f,.} ; »� i� +. f,.} L»' L: 1 ,$ 1 C) 1 , ,� t C) i 3, 3 2 #< 3�:. ;•. " »� 1�«....� L.. ti. ? .L ti.+ f L.. 1' T'7 f ~ � M s.» f '� 1.» L.» L. — _ -- "'T L. w Lam. f" ...._- f 1361 0029240 10/23/92 J L L I V I GSTO N 668a 04 » 3! 3> - - -- 2.9241: 10/23/92 LANGER 64. 1401 » L:.. E # H R 1..f & _._ - - - -.— 4 ! w - I 1 44 ; :: » ' ' :�# 1 � / 23 2 .��#R I C� f RC �. � 742. 9'�..� X i , 4 6: 1 • »+ L....«,► Lw ' 1 ti..� .7r ' 1w. 7ws J 9 02 4 8 j »� �..� t... i..»'�'#' 1 0/ 23/9 2 s Li �..i } # id . t `4 I 11 45 7C I-f:-1- gi p, r .. [ j ».� S » 0 2 wt 2 f {r �R .f .+3 .. 'w• ! s ✓` 1.�� i ♦ }.wr _. �+ . ]J.'.}�� .... �y.. �w � jj i.w l J 7 - L R R Aw f�.r ,� ^7 t +..�t w { 4 : 0029249 1 0/23 / 92 ROLE E R W B RE E I M w - w j i3 i..f �'s w +.'. 155 50 —35n,76 r — CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0007 / EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS 0| FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 0029265 V VOID 1 10/23/92 C COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE M� lei ' ' _-. -_ ' Onk- 12 51 RANDFILL ' . �~ 002 - ^ 10/23/92 DAVID GERMAIN ------- - ---- D '' ''-~'''--` ^ �|~ °`~ (� m| )- 0029255 10/23/92 BIZA��J�I�� 938,w 7C h '' , ^ -�-------------- 00292 OI ` .�10/23/92 MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK #1 22, 9231, 23 `s��''' ` -- ' I�----� -- -- 1�T�T�—COMM ' OF - REVENUE -- 9, 698~48_ 0 02 9 258 y0 ID 10/23/92 FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA) 9 No ASSOC 5 ,�4, 57 , . - 457 0029261 VOID 10 /23 92 FIRST MINNESOTA 368, 75 0 ' -- -- ' MUT --- I - - 111.0 1138, 51 --- 286~00 --- 148.50 636a 64, ------ 18~00r -- ' 0(.292 10/23/92 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION T P1 ""==='= ""^" *� I . -__--_ _ _ -------- ----- 274.61 ' M �r� vuIu ��IU E� RETIREMENT �� '4 VOID ..10/23/92 VACATION CHECK lo 10/23/92 RAMSEY CO SUPPORT & COLLECT -__-- ""^"' -~-_-. _-_ ' _ ~^~.^ ~'=-^'_ ^ ' 711. 33_'' ' --- G2�99 --- 5,177.26 400.00 V� 0029265 V VOID 1 10/23/92 C COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE M� lei ' ' _-. -_ ' -.~ `~~ 272_ ' . ~. - - ^ .. ~ ^ 0 111.0 1138, 51 --- 286~00 --- 148.50 636a 64, ------ 18~00r -- ' 0(.292 10/23/92 MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION T P1 ""==='= ""^" *� I . -__--_ _ _ -------- ----- 274.61 ' M �r� vuIu ��IU E� RETIREMENT �� '4 VOID ..10/23/92 VACATION CHECK lo 10/23/92 RAMSEY CO SUPPORT & COLLECT -__-- ""^"' -~-_-. _-_ ' _ ~^~.^ ~'=-^'_ ^ ' 711. 33_'' ' --- G2�99 --- 5,177.26 400.00 711. 33_'' ' --- G2�99 --- 5,177.26 400.00 { 3' - 132 f i . 33 f 10 CITY-OF MAPt...EWOOD 000 I EMPLOYES GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRE114T PAY PERIOD . ::_-1 H i...{.17 t IB i 1»- inn. —_ _��__� _ __ __ __,_ __._ �..___ -- -- - -__�...--- .- - - - -. __..__- API.O I � VOID 0029279 TOID 10/23/92 FIRST MINNESOTA 0— 9, 053w 24 10/23/92' PUBLIC EMP' RETIREMENT ASSOC 5 332' 12 i 3� , I. 0 `� 1 { _ _ _ _ 0029 1 AS SOC CSS EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS 3,..�6 7 4,� 11 �; iii I i . IT4 I 2' 23i ' 27 ' - j l o f 291 l l { 3' - 132 f i . 33 f 10 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director /� ( I , at� Actio b C ounc Endorse Mo d f1. e Rej Date RE: FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE EU PROVE T PROJECT 84-12 DATE: November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 84 -12, Beam Avenue Water Main West of Highway 61. The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds: Special Assessment Portion $102 $102 $ 0 Property Tax Portion 18 0 18 Water Revenue Portion 183 183 0 Investment Interest 42 42 0 Transfer from W.A.C. Fund 0 6 (6 Surplus 12 567 0 67 Total Project Costs $334 $334 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project totalled $102,367. The extra $18,675 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property tax portion) should be transferred to other projects. Project 86 -25 needs $1,285 and the remaining balance of $17,390 should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. A transfer of $6,108 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w:\agn\84-12 AGENDA NO. J e`.� AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE: DATE: Finance Director Action by C ®unc . -_ n Endorse Re j ecte -- Dat e K, FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECT 86-15 November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 86 -15, Water District No. 8 Improvements (Water Tower and Pump Station). The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: Special assessments levied for this project total $501,250. Surplus bond proceeds totaling $103,800 should be transferred to this project from Project 87 -19 ($42,539) and from Project 86 -22 ($61,261). A transfer of $318,185 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 29 -92. w: \agn \86-15 CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds: Special Assessment Portion $ 501 $ 501 $ 0 Water Revenue Portion 50,450 154 (103 Investment Interest 45 45 0 Transfer From W.A.C. Fund 0 318 (318 Deficit (Financing Needed) 421.985 0 421,985 Total Project Costs $1,019,571 $1,019 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project total $501,250. Surplus bond proceeds totaling $103,800 should be transferred to this project from Project 87 -19 ($42,539) and from Project 86 -22 ($61,261). A transfer of $318,185 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 29 -92. w: \agn \86-15 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE: DATE: Finance Director Action by Council : Endorse Modi_f ed.. Rejecte Dat FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECT 86-22 November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 86 -22, Hillcrest Trunk Sanitary Sewer Main. The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: Special assessments levied for this project total $505,333. Surplus bond proceeds totaling $61,261 should be transferred from this project to Project 86 -15. The remaining deficit should be eliminated by a transfer of surplus investment interest from Project 87 -19 ($14,541) and by a transfer of $187,632 from the Sewer Fund to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 29 -92. w: \agn \86-22 CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds Special Assessment Portion $ 505,333 $ 505,333 $ 0 Property Tax Portion 61 0 61 Water Revenue Portion 75 75,500 0 State Street Aid 65 65 0 Investment Interest 0 14 (14 Transfer From Sewer Fund 279 466 (187 Deficit (Financing Needed) 140,912 0 140 Total Project Costs $ 1,127,206 $ 1,127,206 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project total $505,333. Surplus bond proceeds totaling $61,261 should be transferred from this project to Project 86 -15. The remaining deficit should be eliminated by a transfer of surplus investment interest from Project 87 -19 ($14,541) and by a transfer of $187,632 from the Sewer Fund to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 29 -92. w: \agn \86-22 AGENDA NO. jFwr*'4*w*r AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: RE: DATE: r Finance Director r r Action by Council Mod if e , _ ejeeted� e FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECT 86-25 November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 86 -25, County Road C Improvements White Bear Avenue to McKnight. The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: Special assessments levied for this project total $60,469. Surplus bond proceeds totaling $1,285 should be transferred to this project from Project 84 -12. A transfer of $18 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 29 -92. w:\agn\86-25 CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds: Special Assessment Portion $ 60 $ 60 $ 0 Water Revenue Portion 20 21 (1,285) State Street Aid 3 3 0 Transfer From Sewer Fund 1 1 0 Transfer From W.A.C. Fund 0 18,069 (18 Investment Interest 1 1 0 Deficit (Financing Needed) _, 354 0 _ 19, 354 Total Project Costs $ 107, 547 $ 107 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project total $60,469. Surplus bond proceeds totaling $1,285 should be transferred to this project from Project 84 -12. A transfer of $18 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 29 -92. w:\agn\86-25 AGENDA NO, 6 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director � Ac ti ®n by Council :, � , i � +s!od f e e0te d . RE: FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 87 -13 DATE: November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 87 -13, Meyer Sreet Water Main. The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: Special assessments levied for this project total $42,655. The extra $13,892 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property talc portion) should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. A transfer of $10,295 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w: \agn \87 -13 CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds: Special Assessment Portion $ 42 $ 42 $ 0 Property Tax Portion 13 0 13 Investment Interest 3 3 0 Transfer From W.A. C. Fund 0 10,295 (10 Surplus Q.597 0 Q.597 Total Project Costs $ 56,097 $ 56 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project total $42,655. The extra $13,892 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property talc portion) should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. A transfer of $10,295 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w: \agn \87 -13 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director" Act l on by Counc -� 6 ndorse Mod ie� O RE: FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE 1WROVEMENT PROJECT 87 -19 DATE: November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 87 -19, Boxwood Avenue - McKnight to Dorland. The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: Special assessments levied for this project total $159,875. The extra $69,678 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property tax portion) should be transferred to other projects. Project 86 -15 needs $42,539 and the remaining balance of $27,139 should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. The $14,541 surplus investment interest should be transferred to Project 86 -22 to close that project. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w: \agn \87 -19 CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds: Special Assessment Portion $ 159 $ 159 $ 0 Property Tax Portion 69 0 69 Water Revenue Portion 21 21 0 Investment Interest 31 17 14 Surplus (84,21 0 (84.2 19 Total Project Costs $ 198 $ 198,930 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project total $159,875. The extra $69,678 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property tax portion) should be transferred to other projects. Project 86 -15 needs $42,539 and the remaining balance of $27,139 should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. The $14,541 surplus investment interest should be transferred to Project 86 -22 to close that project. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w: \agn \87 -19 AGENDA NO AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director ---- Action by Ccune11.- Modifie e j ecte .. D, ate RE: FINANCIAL TRANSFERS TO CLOSE IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECT 87 -44 DATE: November 1, 1992 Construction is complete on Project 87 -44, Highway 61 Water Main at Kohlman. The source of funds for this project to date and the proposed final financing plan are as follows: Special assessments levied for this project total $64,303. The extra $44,615 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property tax portion) should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. A transfer of $73,395 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w:\agn\87-44 CURRENT PROPOSED SOURCE OF FUNDS STATUS PLAN DIFFERENCE 1988 Improvement Bonds: Special Assessment Portion $ 64 9 303 $ 64,303 $ 0 Property Tax Portion 44 0 44 Water Revenue Portion 105 105 0 Investment Interest 11 11 0 Transfer From W.A.C. Fund 0 73 (73,395) Deficit (Financing Needed) 28,780 0 _28,780 Total Project Costs $254 254 $ 0 Special assessments levied for this project total $64,303. The extra $44,615 from the 1988 Improvement Bonds (property tax portion) should be transferred to Project 87 -45 as this project is the only project not complete that has been financed by the 1988 Improvement Bonds. A transfer of $73,395 from the W.A.C. Fund -St. Paul Water Service District is needed to finance the unassessed improvements. It is recommended that the Council approve the proposed financing plan, authorize the appropriate budget adjustments and approve the transfers necessary to close this project retroactive to 10- 30 -92. w:\agn\87-44 AGENDA NO..�''� Action by Council AGENDA REPORT eject ed. TO: City Manager Date. FROM: Finance Director RE: AMBULANCE BILL - APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION DATE: October 23, 1992 An application for cancellation of an ambulance bill has been received from Rosemary McGlynn for Anna M. Leski. On July 31, 1991, Anna Leski was transported from the Maplewood Care Center to St. Paul Ramsey Hospital. The bill is $380, and it has been submitted to Medicare which will pay approximately $50 toward the bill. The application is attached for the Council's review. lz ANMCANCEL.AGN r APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE CHARGES NAME OF APPLICANT: !�-S e /��` Z V ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: � � ' CITY: y"� � - STATE: z1.2 -;�e 4e -0�;p ZIP!= r PATIENT'S NAME* DATE -' E 0 SERVICE. AMOUNT U T OF CHARGES / 00, E CANCELLED. REASON FOR REQUEST - CHECK ONE: 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): 2. Other: I certify that the income information I have supplied on this application is true and accurate. I also certify that the amount of the charges requested to be cancelled q • on, are not covered by Medical assistance, worker's compensat Medicare. health 1'nsurance.�- er i nstiranra Sig Date • � G ^ z � -- INCOME IN FORMATION "INCOME" means any amount received from the following sources by any Resident: • Any Public Assistance, including but not limited to Welfare, AFDC, SSI, and Unemployment Compensation • Pensions and Annuities, including PERA and Social Security • Estate or Trust income • Gain from the sale of property or securities • VA Educational Grants • Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, overtime pay and tips • Interest and Dividends • Rental income • Business Profit- -for self - employed individuals, including Farmers • Payments received from properties being sold ^n r.,.l ♦..:,tea. fo%- Deed List all residents of your household. Include yourself. Include their ages and their incomes (if any): 1) Income listed shout d include all i ncome which your household can reasonable expect to receive during the next 12 months. 2) "RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME OF AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT (per month) 02i- .,=�' �' � SOURCE OF INCOME (including employer's address,, if applicable) • /, ;e;p i< < r 9/ TOTAL INCOME: Zt2 �fio� month= S 5 • ��'er year 7�� _71 000�� MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Final Plat LOCATION: McMenemy and Edgemont Streets, south of Skillman Avenue PROJECT: Toenjes Farm DATE: October 29, 1992 INTRODUCTION Action by Council., Endorsed Modiffied Rejecte Date Frank Frattalone is requesting that the City Council approve the Toenjes Farm final plat. This plat will be for 16 homes along McMenemy and Edgemont Streets, south of Skillman Avenue. (See the plat on page 6.) BACKGROUND On May 11, 1992, the City Council: 1. Approved the preliminary plat, subject to seven conditions. (See the minutes on page 4 and the preliminary plat on page 5.) 2. Vacated Edgemont Street, south of Skillman Avenue. (See the map on page 3.) 3. Approved a lot -width variance for Lot One, Block One. DISCUSSION The developer has met the conditions that the Council required to approve the final plat. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Toenjes Farm final plat. jl go \b- 3:memo86b.mem (17) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3., Preliminary Plat Minutes 4. Preliminary Plat 5. Final Plat F1 D 10 I Q .. J AA J W Y .. 3 / PLAZA C/R Al ALVERADO AR 3 IECLCREST DR • S OEA1/V/lt!' OR Q MERIDIAN OR 2400 N. LARK 1 � UTrI.E C Upw RD M d h t V W a = LAURIE CO RD . • z �' CT. 25 y CO RD BL _= :. �- :....:..� r::v:�s� ..... � �•� . . ..�:..... ......... �� ,,, } ... 4 � � BURK E AV �q •: •. ELDRIOOE A ': Q Z ELDR GE AV ,1 .••.. �. ID h h '�ti •'• •. 8E o M NT 4 49 • o/Cium Bed�'� E U RGE AV •' SKILLIMAN AV .•; .•... •• SKILLMAN LLIr1AN AV W KENw p MT. VERNON AV s W J / ��► H m MT V RNON v lb 00 •: DOWNS AV = AMT. VE AV Gtr W W = 2E 1 AV 26 u ~• •_.�•� �''� ROSELA AV Ps PA 26 J o I 8 E LLWOCf 0 AV _ gm 00 AV eELliNOOD AA► BELL L 0 0 yew o h SUMMER AV t 0 0 FENTON AV W It v - h = W W At AV W RIP Y Al/ REC Y Z •' F. h i- p W 41 V h :•: 2.7 W KINGSTON T �. t �"' o _ - AV / KINGSTON AV 116. t W Q j W W Z �► 55 57 58 1 14 4 5 10 • A S !N T - sl SITE LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 1 �. BE 'v M 4=• •�.w s N 3 1000 _.._.._ t4 0 fit h N • L • 2% +� 4 . 4 4i aw 4w • .. • :� AW W � un 198 •'�� 30 , 9S .39..0 0 - (4) -- . s7 .. ' 2b - P. 70 ' 25 194 f u .BOARD OF REALTOR --- j I to G � 33 ■ .�.., , s VEW O SAVE. WEENERNME f p 1 or N [ or. 4 f � � b � Il a ° 0 cc 10 X 3 -r- 4 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE � � PROPOSED VACATION 1986 STREET VACATION iii I1 Attachment 2 3 1. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 2. The proposed lot width is minimal and will not detract from the character of the neighborhood. 3. This variance would allow a reasonable use of Lot One. Denying the variance would create lots on McMenemy Street that would be larger than and not line up with the new lots on Edgemont Street. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all i . Mayor. Bastian moved approval of the Orel imi nary plat subject to the following conditions: a. The City Engineer approving final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans. The drainage and utility plans shall include a five-foot-high, vinyl -clad chain-link fence at the high water mark around the pond in Lots 10 and 11 unless a .slope/grade change is approved which is consistent with City policy. b. The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan, based on the City's environmental protection ordinance. The Director must approve this plan before the developer does any more grading or the City approves the final plat. The developer will install a temporary fence (snow fence) at the outside edge of the crowns of the oak trees on Lot 11 and no grading w i l l be allowed inside the fence. The fence will remain in place until Lot 11 has been built on and an occupancy is accomplished. c. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. d. The developer shall sign an agreement with the City which guarantees that the developer will complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. e. Increase the easement width between Lots 1 and 2 and Lots 9 and 10 from 15 to 30 feet. f. Change the name of Edgemont Street to Edgemont Street North. g. Remove the shed on Lot 10. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all .4j 0 , 7:30 p.m. (8:30 p.m. Conditio se Permit Review Process Ordinance (2nd Reading -4 Votes) a. Mayor Bastian co ned meeting for a public hearing regarding a change in the dinance Bove ing Conditional Use Permit Reviews. 4 Attachment .3 5 -11 -92 TOENJES FARM L -. merves ram 4 "1 1 " AVENUE .u•�w � w - �r �+�.r� T r t � N�sros'tar• dt4.00 v t ��. �� rra� r�•r. rte— rarer• � ��. � as.s ar.a� ., gONt l�111. ! pi 0600 ftR ftft - -- - -- -- -- �' — — Ari NNW l -- — — W.8 uh�s ' C 15 i Kt m soft rnRI In sus. 4 _e M LEGEND i/ v R1OMlO't � ' a�nst� aawtm 0tw� • - q 14 e � - �► �� Iworo�nl swrinRl sts� `, ra ... .,.. r r ra —. �. r _.� .r r r r. r. r r •r r- f - � 1 re mow" A tla." col ! NWO t WFL in .as c 3 sxaty Now 4 I �3 ..$ io k a• /3 NAM ftft MAW ftft. MAW ftpv. `' • - a�•.Z...rr rr.. _� � 9 1 c Ores Am* • SLOS Agm • • ' 6e1 Are* • 4.43 Ages Y • '� K!�. - •t..,� - ._ u�sl ... _.�._ �_` Am•rop Lot an Eton east a a..A . 1 0 I i V - o► I Mw .I��.I�M'MM��t. r •r r ter. r.``� .r r s � 'r � err �— .r ..wr � • v si!'ns s4 w i \ t I .. r �. ..._. -.. r_ ..- r_ L _ ... r .. �. _. - - .��. rr. r�r• torts 4 th" 16 and Iota le Yem n sM C 't r ♦�/ M64MfR. Z w as•th ls.os :«t K i.t Be. all is u..s a. hrsoMM•a sosrA Bug am. To a. C) f '� ••.• . , �' so soi ST. t a.r a,a. th" ...s .t "a &UW" me et.wts that law sasrrsd w me" Ile _ — —� r• r •r. —� . r w� —. —... �. r rs r ra. r r!r Mtn hw ~mm .4 vou"A.. $&sweet . a..rt wer.rM is Wmm U. shy S. ss�sosmos am AM. own Cis ...es,a. arrswtl. _rte �SrvrW. Afro? I i Voeoted ; VERNON AVENUE I LOT LAYOUT, UT_ uyES a STREETS t t'� ' � i SKILL "AN .•" ' �+ o % It • ' �. .� /J# ' . .tom -. � r I � ♦_ . r . «w- - ��..« Wl7M� C�1►7DrA► /II&v%m O CgAl70Mi1► I�e•�r ~IN 1. Awn • . S70 M JVNIA CARL t Pff"N M A AMpt,'. M AwYau . AMi ~ft tWr) 736- Foos ,•� ++ �11LD /ND T7PES ' lop ttRR am at" mwmcA f lrr0 an.1f moil" nal 4mm Rio t�IOL Ous�crrtArf si1L.R0tlf � ti s ,IEWTAT TOENJES Mr FARM e>DIINfR W r, TpN -Rrr� t I � I 1 o SK1L:.11sAN AVENUE 8 0 MICN I! AD 6900 30 I f ~ S 6740 ,� ` t 3r, I { en #x" LP '« I ,' �• 3 Res bas spa a.Ar.u�/l { i N89'04'33 I L 13403 - I ALS VW PLAT US-00 ✓r Necl+ei - -- N89.03'05 325.03 -- $ 8, --- - - - -16 -- - - - - -„ 1----------------- wav - - - -L 60.00 - - -- �I I 4 ' .. 7 ( F 4 0 EaM ► � -_- -13 00 -- -� �.- =. g 1.8 Qi. - - -- - - - -� I------------ Lus �) -- - � - WWATW Autr Or DW Na M OM Lu 6666 -+I Cc 8' g ,� bra- ass� ; I w AAA= , 05 1 � r � VACATED ALLEI' Or WC It9 64808f4 ,� ;� ^ I� NTERLINF 1NCATEO ALLEY g 1 131.13 It : u (s, Iq 1-- N6f•W'06 E— -�_----,�7711 ! NIfb306 f ! �+ ' - -- , - -_ —._ — ' M� .{--- -- ._- •_- •- -T,;., ;�aa'Ad� its - -_ - t� ,�tte fA ; r SLOA1 8 A - z� - -- 8; W PLA 3 ..3 e I o' a ` ° -L ' 6f•o4's!'E -- =� I a r ow Z i �— 133.30 — 1 h .. ��s ys� 2L I __ __— 5-- -• -- -- I --- MI!•O3.0'3 -E - - --+•' �� __ .M 1s•atfiGSE � O - �'t °'�' - - -13 - -- Q �-A- 04 41 Lu _ - 2 2 ' el) I� c7 _�►•`��, i 1 8 +�- -- - - -- -' , ,- - - - - _ -- - -mot - 8� -- �(: - - - - --- y - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'ms �� ftc s• : rss30 f0 r '�_ Nt»•exs - E ` e N W05 0a E ,� 07.1 �---_ _ pi • 1 -- - [t � W .�°° -- - - - - -- r ----------------- • ' C - -__ Y _ -_ � M �• Np•07'il L .— M1f•07'11E 1.16 I i� .� 1 �• 'Ifa� �- f 130.89 lb - - �y, 1' a 'b SOV06*54OW 12 • AL MICA _g 3 ( I `� � • , r o �\ '\ :7 i 14 v 1 .� gl I j JF 1 , '` 1 VACAT 1 /1f / -- � 1.� .. J � -- e3 00 . 8 NUE --- S89 1 &MUTY EASEYENr /f.AT•6t7.f1 CENTERLINE VACATED 1 IT M. NO � Or VEANON A� I MICATEO BY uoc. NO C 0 -a C+ 5 C+ m il LW AT MST w GD* mc. n, Too N -Rrrr CA W. PETERSON 8 A SSOC. INC. 4" dalf . Won66o ►o (612) 735 - 7606 NW 1/4 • NE 114 E SW V4 SE V4 ' I SCALE IN FEET " o is so AW VICINITY MAP ArcTsav 17, TrfM - Rrr v Orr dr "Loa rnkr Id utwty goommos arum, lots so" • tow do ""a .w see"" stb lot floss em,d 10 foot in o"m Mm, d/wwm his" tun Soll sew' ht mm,tr,r� Gftw~ AWMIod. NOTE; O - Dom~ " momb mm Mtw wm, ommint info/ wp I ~*a M m,noNfod RIVAAD RLS a4r1, w M sm,1 IMrN aw 1wr M t/w VOWSWV Iwo W firs tool • — 0.w.s 6" mummo tom,t epwwe. wto sr/ rfr� — &do W ham tilt Mterm"t Mrv" Wrff1 e1m,M we to" meme, amam m,otod -- fir M t>r/+um M we /tot, too It+sot low of r NOW I/ ammom, »: trim - w, w /m,rwM ft bow SM06 W ItA1 • Amootfe to w*W am hips 9e fb1 of A"ONWA AWWW s1DE ADars" ro or p0m . SHEET 2 of 2 SHEETS F,o-11 TO: City Manager FROM City Clerk RE: BUDGET ADJUSTMENT DATE. November 4, 1992 INTRODUCTION. MEMORANDUM ladors ed odi i t The City Clerk's Department is requesting a Budget Adjustment of $12,700 from the Contingency Fund to cover unanticipated additional part -time wages. BACKGROUND. Because of the ever - increasing work load in the City Clerk Department and the need to cover absences for sick leave and vacation, it has been necessary to have our part -time employees work more than their formally scheduled hours. This has created anticipated overall deficits of $4,200 in Division 301, City Clerk and $5,000 overall in Division 302, Licenses and Records. Additionally, the two Primary Elections (one of which was not anticipated at the time of budget preparation) as well as the high voter turnout expected for the General Election has necessitated paying wages for more election judges and more hours than was previously expected. This creates an expected $3,500 deficit in the Division 304, Elections, budget for part -time wages. RECOMMENDATION. Authorize a 1992 Budget Transfer of $12,700 from the Contingency Fund to Accounts 101- 301 - 000 -4020 (4,200), 101- 302 - 000 -4020 ($5,000) and 101 - 304 - 000 -4020 ($3,500). AGENDA REPORT .�3.i, i : ✓�:t t l� C ... TO: City Manager FROM: Public Works Coordinator ��ioa�f I ed, Rejecte�. SUBJECT: Budget Transfer — Street Lights date DATE: November 2, 1992 In keeping with the standard practice of placing a street light at each intersection in the city, Northern States Power Company has prepared estimates for placement of lights at: Mailand Road and Lakewood Drive Mailand Road and Crestview Drive Mailand Road and Mamie Street Mailand Road and Highpoint Curve Mailand Road and Mary Street Sterling Street and O'Day Street Lakewood Drive and Mamie Avenue Schaller Drive and O'Day Street Schaller Drive and Ferndale Street Valley View Avenue and Ferndale street Schadt Drive and Crestview Court Schadt Drive and Marnie Court Schadt Drive and Mary Place The amount of the estimate for the placement of the above street lights is $4466.51. No funds were budgeted for these installations. Therefore, it is recommended that the amount of $4470.00 be transferred from the contingency fund to the new construction fund in the street lights and signals division. WCC ic AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT: Action ion by Council m, Endorse TO: City Manager M o dif i RejecUe FROM: City Engineer Date SUBJECT: Plan Approval Resolution— McKnight Road Bike Path, Project 90 -06 DATE: November 2, 1992 4 In October 1991, the city council approved the plans and financing for this project. The motion, however, does not match the resolution required for federal funding. It is recommended the. attached resolution be adopted to fulfill the requirement for federal funding. KGH I Attachment RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Project S.P. 62- 668 -29 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the construction of a detached path along County State Aid Highway No. 68(McKnight Road) within the limits of the City as a Federal Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this day of 1992. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Maplewood I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution.is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Maplewood at a meeting thereof held in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, on the day of 1992, as disclosed by the records of said .City in my possession. (Seal) AGENDA NO. '* AGENDA REPORT A.; � -a.�� by Coun TO: City Manager 10J o d I f ' e ty g o c�cctc FROM: Assistant City Manager Date RE: PROCLAMATION: VALUES WEEK - NOVEMBER 8 THROUGH NOVEMBER 14 DATE: November 2, 1992 INTRODUCTION Last spring, Roseville Area Schools District 623 invited its communities to participate in the identification of a set of core community values. Out of the process, seven core values were identified and adopted by District's 623 School Board. The School Board is requesting that all cities and local agencies, churches and local organizations adopt the values as well and proclaim November 8 through November 14 as Values Week, RECOMMENDATION The attached proclamation is presented to the City Council for their consideration and adoption. tmc Attachment VALVES REEK November 8- 14,1992 � members of the community have identified the following sets of values: RESPECT FOR SELF AND OTHERS: Appreciating the unique qualities of others and oneself, accepting and affirming individual differences and cultural diversity; and displaying courtesy and appreciation for others COMPASSION.• Caring about others; displaying kindness and concern for others; empathizing with others' feelings; and helping others through actions RESPONSIBILITY Understanding and accepting the impact and consequence of personal actions and decisions,; striving to fulfill the obligations to the common good of society. H0IVESTY /INTEGRITY• Practicing truthfulness and sincerity in relationships and actions; shaping a clear set of beliefs and ethics which direct thoughts and actions COMMITMENT.- Believing in one's personal capacity to make a difference; investing the hard work needed to realize goals; seeking ways to consistently improve; and persisting through setbacks VALUING F141KIL -1FS: Respecting one's own and others' families, affirming the need for healthy families; and supporting families in their needs SENSE OF C011slWfINITY• Accepting the rights, responsibilities and privileges of belonging to the community; striving to include all members of the community in the process of community life. A'HEREAS, it is the desire of these communities to collectively promote these values and to encourage their support through the establishment of a "Values Weep" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Gary W. Bastian, Mayor of the City of Maplewood do hereby proclaim the week of November 8 through November 14, 1992 as VALUES WEEK in Maplewood and call upon the citizens to partake of the activities dunng this "Values Week," through embracing and implementing these values in their work and home life. IN A'ITIVESS WBEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Maplewood to be affixed this 9th day of November, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and ninety -two. MA YOR SENT BY:ISD 623 ;11- 2-92 8:35AM X -� 6 12 770 4506; 2 Prodimation Whereas, members of the communit have identified the followin set of values; Respect for Self and Others: Appreciatin the uni q ualities of others and oneself; acceptin and affirmin individual differences and cultural diversit and displa courtes and appreciation for others. Compassion: Carin about others; displa kindness and concern for others empathizin with others' feelin and helpin others throu actions. Responsibilit Understandin and acceptin the impact and conse of personal actions and decisions str to fulfill the obli to the common g ood of societ Honest Inte Practicin truthfulness and •-sincerit in relationsWps and actions IZ. shapin a clear set of beliefs and ethics which direct thou and actions. Commitment: Believin in one's personal capacit to make • a difference investin the hard work needed to realize g oals ; seekin wa to consistentl improve and persistin throu setbacks. Valuin Families: Respectin one's own and others' families- affirmin the need for health families and supportin families in their needs. Sense of Communit Acceptin the ri responsibilities and privile of belon to the commuru*t strivin to include all members of the communi community in the process of 't life. Whereas, it is the desire of these communities to collectivel promote these values and to encoura their support throu the e'stablishmen of a "Values Week-" Now of A ___3 therefore be it resolved that the cit AEr��s adopt the communit values and declare the week of November 8 throu November 14,, 19.92 as "Values Week," and . That the citizens are encoura to partake of the activities durin this "Values Week," throu embracin and implementin these values in their work and home life. o o ci . ,pject b the cl _ A ttest: Cit minis tra for Cit Clerk AGENDA NO, AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE- DATE: Mayor and City Council City Manager FIRE FIGHTERS BENEFITS November 2, 1992 INTRODUCTION Endo rs s Reje Date The Maplewood Fire Fighters Relief Association has accepted the following benefits schedule: PER YEAR OF SERVICE Current Benefits $1 1992 +200 1,900 1993 +100 2 1994 +80 2, 080 1995 +80 2,160 1996 +80 2, 240 This is the same as what was worked out by the Subcommittee and as we previously discussed. RECOMMENDATION Approval is recommended. tmc Action by Counc!:. To Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Subj: Joy Park Date: October 19, 1992 � doir —s- e d ll'o. f m tee Recreatio Introduction Please find attached a letter from North St. Paul City an Bob Gatt requesting i Y ager q g nformation as to our City Council's current position on the future use of Jo Park (Century y & Joy Road on the north end of Silver Lake), Background Joy Park is a 63 acre natural area located at Century Avenue e and Joy Road (which is an extension of Lydia Avenue to the east) and i s under the control of Ramsey County Parks & Recreation Depart - ment. Although the park is in the City of Maplewood and ser- vices the residents of that northeast corner of the city, it also provides open space and park facilities for the cities of North St. Paul, White Bear Lake and Oakdale. Recent improvements to the area include the reconstruction of Jo Road, and improvements in the ark y Ro p such as the lowering of the hill between the road and Silver Lake, an additional new twent lot and removal of car parking the old playground equipment. Past improvements have included the construction of two icnic shelters, a boat launch area, P parking, picnic and toilet facili- ties. The .area to the north of Joy Road toward Interstate 694 is a very natural environment with tall grass and six inch P ines that have grown over the past twenty years into full size buffers from the off - ramp of I - 694. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation has looked at a e improvement long-range rovement ro ram but g g p program, t lack of funds has placed development at a low priority. They do, however, plan to c ontinue rovidin trash is P g grass cutting, pickup, and other basic maintenance to the facility. The City of Maplewood recreation services has used this facility for many summers as a Day Camp site . The location of the park makes it very difficult for the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department to patrol a P p the area. The location i next to Silver Lake n a woodsy setting makes it very inviti p icnics and uiet y g for P q . • Unfortunately, it also draws an element of society that is looking for a place to gather to drink and potentially distribute drugs. It would be my strop recommenda- ation that we continue t g o provide strong police patrol of the area and make every endeavor to work with the Ramsey Count Sheriff to clear the area in conformity ormity with the posted park rules. I feel that the park, because of its location, should remain as a part of the Ramsey County Park system and that we should encour age Ramsey County to develop some minor.traols through the park which would not be a heavy burden upon their Capital Improvement Program. if it became necessary for Ramsey County to divest itself of the property, I would expect Maplewood to accept responsibility for the area. Its location and natural open space value are impor- tant and any loss would be tragic. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council not Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department and the City of North St Pawl that we will continue to police Joy Park as we are doing at the present time and.request that Ramsey County continue its mainte- nance and upkeep of the park. As funds become available, we re- quest that Ramsey County make every effort to improve Joy Park with trails. c: City Clerk CITY H kH[- OCT I 41992 GENERAL OFFICE 770 -4450 ENGINEERING 770 -4463 RECREATION 770 -4471 UTILITIES 770 -4488 POLICE ADMINISTRATION .770 -4466 — -- --- - -- FIRE ADMINISTRATION 770 -4480 .2526 EAST SEVENTH AVENUE NORTH SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55109 October 12, 1992 Mr. Michael McGuire City Manager City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55309 Dear Mike: The North St. Paul City Council has asked me to contact Y ou with regard to the Maplewood City Council's current position on the future use of Joy Park. Previous discussions of Joy Park .included: Encouraging Ramsey County to devote a larger percentage of park funds to the development and maintenance of Joy park. Joint responsibility for maintenance and olicin of the p g park by Ramsey County, Maplewood, North St. Paul and Oakdale. Donation of the park_by Ramsey County to the cities of Maplewood and /or North St. Paul. Detachment of Joy Park from to North St. Paul. Please comment on any other considerations the Council may deem relevant in this ma tter. Thank you for your cooperation. Since ly, �7L � Robert E. G tti City Manager REG : j a As a matter of policy, the City of North St. Paul does not discriminate among applicants and participants on the basis of race, religion, sex, national origin, color, or handicap. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM:' Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Variances and Registered Land Survey DATE: October 34, 1992 INTRODUCTION 1 , 0 -tion by Cellci Endorsed - ®d i 1 _ -- Rejee Date Mr. Steven Bruns is making three requests. Mr. Bruns is the attorney for the title company that issued a policy for 2660 Keller Lake Boulevard. The tide company hired him to clear up the property title. The three requests are: 1 A registered land survey (RLS) for six lots. Tract A is an existing lot along Gervais Lake. Michael and Ann Bell, of 2660 Linden Lane, own this tract. Tracts B and C would be two new lots along Gervais Lake. Tract B was sold to David Fenner of 842 County Road C. Steven and Kimberly Sorensen bought Tracts C. D, E and F. Tracts A, B and C have boat docks and ramps, but no buildings. Tracts D and F would be for Keller Parkway and Linden Lane. The RLS would move the Keller Parkway right -of -way 6.55 feet to the east. The current right -of -way is not centered on the pavement. 20 A variance from the shoreland ordinance. The Code requires a minimum average area of 15,000 square feet for lots that front on Gervais Lake. The average lot area of Tracts A, B and C are only 764 square feet per lot. 3. Three variations from the subdivision ordinance: a. Two lot area variations for Tracts B and C. The Code requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. Tract B has only 360 square feet. Tract C has only 1554 square feet. b. A lot width variation for Tract B. The Code requires at least 60 feet of frontage on a public street. Tract B has only 20 feet. (Tract A is also substandard, but it is an existing lot. The County recorded this lot division in 1969. We have no record of the City approving this division.) BACKGROUND History The land now shown as Tracts B -F was owned by Mr. Casper and Mr. Wyngeeren. In 1990, they applied for a lot division. The purpose of the lot division was to divide what the RLS now shows as Tract B from the rest of 2660 Keller Parkway. On August 14, 1990, the City staff approved the lot division, subject to the following conditions: 1. Combining the new lot with the property at 842 County Road C for identification and tax purposes. 2. 1 Record the new deeds within one year. Mr. Casper and Mr. Wyngeeren sold the new lot (Tract B) to David Fenner and the balance of the property (Tracts C -F) to Steven and Kimberly Sorensen. The County Recorder, however, would not accept the deeds because the land is registered rather than abstract land. The County recorder is requiring an RLS. Findings Required for a Variance from the Shoreland Ordinance State law requires the following findings for a variance: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Findings Required for a Variation from the Subdivision Ordinance Section 30 -15 states that the City Council may approve variations from the subdivision regulations which do not adversely affect the plan and spirit of the regulations. 2 DISCUSSION 1990 Lot Split The City approved the lot division in 1990. One of the conditions requires that the deeds be recorded within one year. The deeds have not yet been recorded. Since the property owner did not record the deeds within one year of City approval, the Cites approval is null and void. The City requires a one year limit because changing circumstances may effect the Cites approval. In this case, circumstances have changed. Variance and Variations There were no variances in 1990, since the properly owner could combine the lake lot (Tract B) with the inland lot on County Road C. The City is requiring variances for the RLS because the RLS would create separate Lakeshore lots. Under an RLS, the property owners could sell these lots separately from their inland lots. Since these Lakeshore lots are separate saleable parcels, they are subject to the minimum lot area and width requirements. Shoreland Regulations The main problem with this RLS is the shoreland regulations. The State requires that the City enforce shoreland regulations. One of the goals of the shoreland ordinance is to prevent the appearance of overcrowding by limiting the number of buildings and docks on the shoreline. The ordinance tries to do this by requiring minimum areas for shoreland lots. The DNR has does not object to this RLS because of the unusual circumstances. (See their letter on page 8.) The unusual circumstances are that these lots were previously sold based on the Cites 1990 lot division approval. The 1990 division met the letter, but not the intent of the ordinance. The letter of the law was met because the Lakeshore lots could be combined with the inland lots to meet the minimum lot area requirements. This cannot be done under an RLS. The DNR is proposing changes to the law that will prevent these types of divisions in the future. A compromise would be to approve the RLS, but require a deed restriction that would prohibit any building construction on the Lakeshore lots. There is an alternative to the variations and variance. The owners of 2660 Keller Parkway could give a private easement for lakeshore use, rather than selling a lot. An easement would eliminate the need for an RLS or any variances, since there would be no property division. Mr. Fenner, however, has already paid $8,000 for fee title to Tract B. 3 RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the resolution on page 9. This resolution approves a lot area variance for Tracts B and C. Approval is because the City previously approved the divisions as a lot division in 1990. The County has cleated a hardship for the property owners by requiring an RLS. 20 Approve the resolution on page 10. This resolution approves lot area variations and a lot frontage variation for Tracts B and C. Approval is because the City previously approved the divisions as a lot division in 1990. The County has created a hardship for the property owners by requiring an RLS. These variations are subject to the following condition: Recordable quit claim deeds must be given to the City from the owners of Tracts B and C. These deeds shall be from the property owners to the City. These deeds shall prohibit the construction of any buildings, except a dock, on Tracts B and C. 3. Approve the proposed registered land survey shown on page 7. This approval shall be subject to the applicant doing the following before the City signs the RLS: a. Give the City a public street easement over Tract D. The easement shall be to Ramsey County. b. Give the City a public street easement over Tract F. The easement shall be to the City of Maplewood. C, Payment of a deferred City assessment. d. Payment of $100 to the City for County recording fees. These fees include the covenants and easements. go /memo92.mem (4) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed RLS 4. DNR letter 5. Variance Resolution 6. Variations Resolution 4 FS 4 22 PAL Geivo%r / L � a W . PLAZA C/R � ` CT p ALVERADO DR 3 BfLLCREST OR 4 DEAUVILLE OR � •'�' 3 'MERIDIAN OR \� \\ =a ►i ♦s /t 69 19 I�awN At� } Q v GRMIOV1Etit► oc VIKING LOCATION MAP VA DNA IS HEIGH rS co no 'o• .. .................. .. . ........ . ............................ ...... ......... .......... .......... E< i � tow o sro 5 Attachment P-1 . 0. P. „• ■ R 57O.-r ,3" 0 .73 c>,c. C�1 • � � 3 5 6 J146°04• � 1.a9 'uC. ■ r6z - 33 4414AA- L - G OV Ln Rt 87r 30.15 � / it �•L ° • A 5* V40 cli T (OZ. ss R 15 p 643 -07 ro Ce 4. s (."7 ac 2686 • c l) E2674 - � E lie IL a 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 A E, ONES VV 4 ?0 - V40 4 2666 2 66 C" (7 67 09 3 2654 1 4 8 2660,-Qp 931 13 {ez-rallt, 634.70 00 COUNTY ROAD C 49 4w e6 too 7 -9 !CINZ LE ..3711C (7) 2634 910 s i ° '� Zrojff7 Z3i.33 Ph% 4 )0 4 7 2 6 6 D Do, &; 17 2-4- 110 or -7. 0 ne• 2 61 6 3G (-34 50 `: C � 9 � A-00 �4 1.45 ac . � � (7-3-7. ■ 1 -s,44 i 21 (13) -3 U p-&7 17Z 150 306-97 1(44) I PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP R EGISTERED LAND SURVEY MR. BRENNER'S LOT Attachment 2 Ir ' o•� ^ ��j ''`.c' �� I / • -... /'d`ab` r•• ` 7l ''. C'� `~ roll d� J S .-• -� c �� rte. �► o � �i � 0 : �� h �� : o / rr� �t��s ti� orb O ��o�� ?o / � h '°,'�'� � x '1 1 . ., . ..��% . �. .tip V •# bf ,� •� / j AN • c i s •A �� CZ Cs t � �, > � ` ♦ !. , v� � �� (2s1. { y ... �� tom- •. �•► o � � rr' ` ~_ . 8 .. ; /V ?" K N '� f 2 . y�oS�j. • v N6l JV' /O"E .••`� ..- ? ?lS.10 .... .. ` • a� .fOV /tl /int 0� .I'Ar� or S'i C`ion �J w M1J 3! IO E re % , ^ 7 `, y5, 1611 L as 2 0 �J n PROPOSED RLS 4 N 7 Attachment 3 STATE OF M EDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO. METRO WATERS, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, rIlJ 5�� 772 -7910 i October 2, 1992 OCT 5 Mr. Geoff Olson Maplewood Community Development 1830 East County Road 8 Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 RE: Gervais Lake Lot Split Dear Mr. Olson: This letter is in response to further information provided concerning the proposed lot splits in the vicinity f Linden Lane and Keller Pa • y • rkway. Due to the complex and unique circumstances surrounding this transfer of land, the DNR would not object to the issuance of the necessary approvals. We acknowledge that, in the future, it will be difficult to consider ro osals such as this. P P If you have any questions, please contact me at - 7910. Sincerely, Molly Shodeen Area Hydrologist c: Paul Ratzlaff, Equity Title g Attachment 4 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Steven H. Bruns from Price & Bruns, Ltd. applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, the legal description of the properties are: Tracts B and C of Registered Land Survey No. WHEREAS, Section 36 -566 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires an average lot area of 15,000 square feet per lot. WHEREAS, the average lot area of Tracts A, B and C are only 764 square feet per lot. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this variance on September 21, 1992. They did not make a recommendation to the City Council. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on November 9, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance because the City previously approved the divisions as a lot division in 1990. The County has created a hardship for the property owners by requiring an RLS. Adopted on 1992. Attachment 5 SUBDIVISION CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Steven H. Bruns from Price & Bruns, Ltd. applied for three variations from the subdivision code. WHEREAS, the legal description of the properties are: Tracts B and C of Registered Land Survey No. _ WHEREAS, Section 30- 8(fl(1)(a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet and a minimum frontage of 60 feet. WHEREAS, Tract B has only 360 square feet, Tract C has only 1,554 square feet and Tract B has only 20 feet of frontage. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this variation on September 21, 1992. They did not make a recommendation to the City Council. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on November 9, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variations for the following because the City previously approved the divisions as a lot division in 1990. The County has created a hardship for the property owners by requiring an RLS. These variations are subject to the following condition: Recordable quit claim deeds must be given to the City from the owners of Tracts B and C. These deeds shall be from the property owners to the City. These deeds shall prohibit the construction of any buildings, except a dock, on Tracts B and C. Adopted on 1992. Attachment 6 10 Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes 9 - 21 -92 Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of e ;dslb,,e olution which approves a conditional use pe for an addition that w twenty feet into the required rear setback. he City approves this p 't because it meets the findings required by c setback' .he that the setback would be same as the existing building. The Cit�vpproves this permit subject to the fp1lowing conditions: (1) All c traction shall follow the sit plan that the City stamped September 9,199 The Director of Comm 'ty Development may approve minor changes. (2) The propose construction t be substantially started within one year of council app val or the 't shall become null and void. The council may grant up to ne one ear extension of the permit. (3) The landscaping aloh&Ahe west lot line shall remain. (4) Trash containe os shall be provided around all trash containers and shall be 1paqu They shall be protected by concrete - filled steel posts, or uivalen anchored in the ground at the front corners of the structur e enclos shall have a gate that is 100% opaque. (5) The City Co)(ncil shall review Commissioner P1Earson seconded it in one year. Ay Allenspach, Axdahl,. Fischer, Frost, Gerk Martin, Pearson, Rossbach The motion tossed. Commissi er Rossbach moved the Planning Co ' sion advise the City Council that in ir review of whether a fence is necessary not on the Barracks liquor prope ,the Council may want to ascertain how muc of the vegetation that is on th perimeter of the property actually lies on the S ck property and is anti their control. If that amount is minimal, the Coun ' may want to rec mmend additional plantings be put in if a fence is omi d. ommissioner Pearson seconded Ayes-- Allenspach, Axd , Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Mme, Pearson, ossbach The motion passed. b. Variances and RLS (Keller Parkway) Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Commissioners asked staff to clarify issues regarding the possibility of owners giving private easements and the location of Keller Parkway right -of -way. Maplewood Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 9 -21 -92 Steven Bruns, an attorney representing the applicants, explained this request. Mr. Bruns said he has completed registered land surveys in the recent past in other counties and they were accepted by both the State and county. Mr. Bruns said the major concern with this issue is that the purchasers of Tracts B, C, D, E and F need to get their closing documents on the property recorded. Mr. Bruns said if a plat were to be required, a dedicated road. would be shown only on the platted land. Paul Ratzloff, Equity Tide Services, 6800 France Avenue South, Edina, explained their concerns in this matter. The Commission discussed the history and legal complexities of this property and whether the Commission should make any recommendation without legal counsel. David Fenner, 842 County Road C, explained the history of his property. Mr. Fenner explained he did everything he could in an attempt to get the deeds recorded within one year, but was finally denied by the County Recorder, Commissioner Fischer moved that, given the complexity of the issues and the extenuating circumstances involved and in the absence of legal counsel at this meeting, the Planning Commission pass this on to the City Council without a recommendation. Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes•- Allenspach, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach The motion passed. c.\ Meetings with Staff Co 'ssioner Fischer reported on the meetin th the Directors of Parks and Recrea and Public Safety. The Co ion asked staff to add this item to the next mee ' s agenda for forth cession. d. Oak Ridge Plat Commissioner Fisc asked st to further explain the preliminary report which was included the agenda packe , or the proposed Oak Ridge plat. Commissia r Fischer asked staff to in one more map with the next update on 0 roposal, showing existing and plane ads from McKnight Road and enteur Avenue to Sterling Street and the railr d tracks. I -/ MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Sign Plan Change LOCATION: 1935 Beam Avenue PROJECT: Maplewood Corner Shoppes DATE: October 8, 1992 INTRODUCTION ,Action by CounC11 mJ Endorse Mod � ". ed.� Re j eofed-- Date Blockbuster Video is requesting that the City Council change the sign criteria for the Maplewood Corner Shoppes. The change would allow Blockbuster Video to replace an existing sign. The existing sign is five feet high from the street and 38 square feet. The new sign would be 20 feet tall and 160 square feet. (See the drawing and site plan on pages 3 and 4.) BACKGROUND April 14, 1987: The Design Review Board approved the sign criteria for the Maplewood Corner Shoppes. The Board allowed two ground signs -one along the Maplewood Mall ring road and one along Beam Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Approve the replacement of a ground sign at the Maplewood Corner Shoppes, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner shall remove the existing ground sib on Beam Avenue. 2. All construction shall follow the site plan and drawings on pages 3 and 4 of the October 8, 1992 staff report. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 3. The sign shall not extend over the public right -of -way. mb \mem \mapcorn go \b- 3:mapcorn.mem (2, north 1/2) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Sign Sketch dated September 29, 1992 • .. • l 40 r►• ♦ •• • • • • • • r •• .•� '•� •'� +• • • « ` +. + 40 + a Ia • • ♦r • .I i •e '+ i • lb so ��• • COUNT # • +•� �• ROAD V .�• •• •7 t; .n.. / woaoLYNN AVE. -- Lyp 0 W AVE o 3 U ZOE 0 ' y lot JOj MAPLEWOOD u- o � Z = �t rrm CORN_ _ ER SHOPPLS •. Cr AVE AVE :. BEAM P CN* MAPLE vA EW AVE o mC W �+ © w t:. o J • W �C X14 m W Ponj VALE �I 4�. coupiry J .. Nay AVE CouRr o s.y l ok% ra AVE„ rr. V > n23 ° 3 a EDGEHILL #D. QEm oNT AVE. � CM eRooKs AVE. t; BROCKS CT. SEX TANT Z k .• N EL f ^ LOCATION MAP Q N 2 Attachment 1 �Q 1110 O p .o SAO t� a � • � A a BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO • i • um P" omega a b F � 4 • . r �aaaaaaa of aa G a 4 aaaaa aaas BEAR AVENUE PROPOS PYLON SIGN LOCAT I OAT SITE PLAN MAPLE1100D CORUiBR BHOPP88 3 A ttac hm ent 2 4 N �.. - 7p - y - - „v: r.. .. - - '-+r s +r - � • i r^ .+�... .iu -ti.L .. - „� t . - m 090 • Y ,f>y171` � .. '4TH Z SN �_^�� x :S a...�.- 'Aer...s„� s � � r .i - �=7: x- � 7., •r "b � -� 1-a- � y , .. . �^ �y `t sxA wt' �.y''� - °r' �K -.C.rF fi''`r r' s. - r '} +.. �- as •w 1i ... .- .. � '. - - 3. ” 6'fi -C s +o-r,. Y r. -.� - - ?'� .:...r ,r <''' � yei�•k� - *- y'S+i. - 'q._�'n.> - c: '- 0 SEP 2 9 1992 I a % t -A-Z It Atta MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B. MAPLEVVOOD, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 13, 1992 19 CALL TO ORDER Cbal*rpm 2. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Marvin Erickson Michael Holder Marie Robinson Bruce Thompson Scott Wasiluk 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Present Present Present Present Present a. September 8, and 22, 199 Boardmember Thompson 22, 1992, changing Chan and approval of the Sept Boardmember Erickson 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA approval of the amended minutes of September Moe to Acting Chairperson Erickson in item 1, � 1992, minutes as submitted.. Ayes --Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson Boardmember Robzvson moved approval of the Boardmember Tho seconded 5. UNFINISHED/BUSINESS There was/no unfinished business. 6. DESIGN REVIEW nded agenda, deleting item 6 d. ,- -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, a. Sign Plan Change - Blockbuster Video Sign at the Maplewood Corner Shopper, 1935 Beam Avenue Vince Driessen, with Mid - America Entert ainment, was present representing Blockbuster Video. John Nelson, manager of the shopping center, was present representing the landlord. Mr. Driessen said he is in agreement with the called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 10 -13 -92 recommended conditions in the staff report. Mr. Driessen said the sign would be white plexiglas reader board with four panels --each panel would be constructed for a specific tenant name. Boardmember Thompson asked if a new tenant would be allowed to install their corporate sign with different colors. W. Nelson said the sign is designed to allow a change in tenants. Mr. Nelson said color has not been discussed, but he would like the new tenant's colors to blend with the existing sign and shopping center. Mr. Nelson said his intention is to keep the reader board to one color. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the replacement of a ground sign at the Maplewood Corner Shopper, subject to the foll owing conditions: 16 The property owner shall remove the existing ground sign on Beam Avenue. Z. All construction shall follow the site plan and drawings of the October 8, 1992 staff report. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 3. The sign shall not extend over the public right -of -way. Boardmember Holder seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson b. Sign P1an�Change - Maplewood Square Shopping ter, 3035 White Bear Avenue Kathy Buller, re ing the landlo signage would b to the upper f repainted a greand royal blue i Ms. Butlers 'd T- Birds' f cia color. med that with this request the ;c ia,!the wooden fascias would be tal awnings with closed soffits would be would also be repainted with the -new Boardmember Robinson (1) Approval of the praplewoo, the 'ty has stamped September 25, 1992. These plans are for the qua re exterior remodeling. The owner of the Mew quaze shall p ch the holes and paint the fascias the same color o all sides of the b (2) Amend the sign criteria for the Maplewood Square as follows: AGENDA NO..Tq, AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: REQUEST BY COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD FOR AMENDMENT OF AGREEMENT RELATED TO TAX INCREMENT DATE: October 28, 1992 REQUEST - EndoTse& -� Date•°° The Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership has requested that the guaranteed annual amount from property taxes on their project be reduced. BACKGROUND When the Cottages of Maplewood project was approved in 1988, it included a $275,000 payment from the City of Maplewood to pay for site improvements. In exchange for this payment, the developers for the Cottages of Maplewood executed a development agreement that included a guarantee that the annual tax increments from the project would be $75,726 through the year 2003, which is the maturity date of the bonds. This agreement provided that if the annual tax increments were less than $75,726 in any year, then the Cottages of Maplewood would pay to the City the difference between the tax increments and $75,726. Details on this agreement are in the attached letter from Mary Ippel dated October 22nd, In 1989 taxable tax increment bonds were sold to provide money for the $275,000 payment to the Cottages of Maplewood. Part of the tax increments from this project were pledged to pay the debt service costs on the 1989 taxable tax increment bonds that were issued to finance the developer subsidy. The remaining tax increments were pledged to pay the debt service costs on 1989 tax exempt tax increment bonds that were issued to finance park development projects. The debt service costs on this second bond issue are also partially financed by an annual City- wide property tax levy. In 1992, the tax increment revenue from this project will be less than the $75,726 amount guaranteed by the developer. Consequently, the attached letter dated June 4th was sent to the Cottages of Maplewood which requested that they pay $17,495.38 which is the amount under $75,726. In response, Howard Rekstad, general partner, sent the attached letters dated June 23rd and July 23rd. These letters outline his request. DISCUSSION The June 23rd letter from Mr. Rekstad states that "from the standpoint of the necessity of this reduction I must inform you that without such relief, the Village of Woodlynn is not viable". During a meeting on October 7th, Mr. Rekstad indicated that "not viable" was meant to indicate that the lender could start foreclosure proceedings if the negative cash flow continued for this project. Mr. Rekstad also has supplied audited financial information for the final 5 months of 1990 and all of 1991 to prove the need for a reduction in the guaranteed annual tax increments. The information submitted indicated that there was a negative cash flow of $24,991 in 1991. This was difficult to evaluate because the comparable information for 1990 was only for five months. Mr. Rekstad has indicated that he can't eliminate the negative cash flow by rent increases because 60% of the units are for low and moderate income people with HUD rent controls. The remaining 40 % of the units have there rental rates controlled by the market which is very competitive according to Mr. Rekstad. The reduction requested by Mr. Rekstad is for the years 1992 through 2003. At $17,495 per year, the total reduction requested for the 12 year period is $209,940. The next page indicates revenues and expenses related to the Cottages of Maplewood tax increment district and the two 1989 tax increment bond issues. The projected revenues assume that Mr. Rekstad's request will not be approved. Projected revenues exceed expenses in all years except 1992 -1993 and 2004 - 2008. In 1992 -1993, the scheduled tax levy for the 1989 tax increment bonds has been cancelled because there is a surplus in the Tax Increment Fund. The projected deficits in 2004 -2008 will be financed by the projected surpluses in the years 1994 -2003. Overall the projected revenues exceed expenses by $304,553. This surplus is planned to be used for the Community Center project. 2 City of Maplewood Cottages of Maplewood Project Tax Increment Housing District #1 -3 Projected Revenues and Expenses (A) On 9 -11 -89 the City Council gave preliminary approval on the 1989 Tax Exempt Tax Increment Bonds. The agenda report (1 -2) indicated that part of the debt service costs on the bonds (26 %) would be financed by the tax increment produced by the Cottages of Maplewood project. The remaining 74% would be financed by property tax levies. On 10 -19 -89 the City Council adopted a resolution for the sale of these bonds. This resolution provided (on page 18) tax levies for the years 1989 through 2008 to pay part of the debt service costs on the bonds. (B) The tax levies payable in 1992 and 1993 have been /will be cancelled as there is a surplus in the Tax Increment Fund. Revenues Expenses Revenues Year Tax rDebt Taxable 1989 Tax- exempt Less Increment Tax onds T.I. Bonds Expenses Revenue Le A Total Service Deb t Service Total 1992 75,726 (B) 75 44,235 101 146 (70,294) 1993 75,726 (B) 75,726 47,800 106,035 153 (78 1994 75,726 91 166 50,949 109 160,924 6,002 1995 75,726 95,000 170 48,886 113,596 162 8,244 1996 75 93,380 169,106 46 112 158 10,236 1997 75 96 172,556 49 115,340 164,860 7 1998 75 99,940 175 46 118 165 10 1999 75,726 102,690 178,416 49,205 120,917 170 8 2000 75,726 110,140 185 50,960 128 178,972 6 2001 75,726 111 187,506 47,470 129 177,042 10,464 2002 75 113,030 188,756 48,740 130,762 179,502 9 2003 75 118,970 194,696 20 165 186 8 2004 58 119 177,331 182,849 182 (5,518) 2005 58,231 123,930 182,161 188 188 (6 2006 58,231 128,030 186,261 193 193,910 (7,649) 2007 58,231 131,390 189,621 197,860 197 (8 2008 58,231 133,970 192 200,698 200,698 (8 2009 58,231 135,780 194 139,658 139,658 54,353 2010 58 58 0 58,231 2011 58,231 58 0 58 2012 58,231 58,231 0 58 2013 58,231 58,231 0 58 2014 58 58,231 0 58,231 2015 58 58,231 0 58,231 TOTAL 1,607,484 1 3,412,644 552 2,555,643 3,108,091 304 553 (A) On 9 -11 -89 the City Council gave preliminary approval on the 1989 Tax Exempt Tax Increment Bonds. The agenda report (1 -2) indicated that part of the debt service costs on the bonds (26 %) would be financed by the tax increment produced by the Cottages of Maplewood project. The remaining 74% would be financed by property tax levies. On 10 -19 -89 the City Council adopted a resolution for the sale of these bonds. This resolution provided (on page 18) tax levies for the years 1989 through 2008 to pay part of the debt service costs on the bonds. (B) The tax levies payable in 1992 and 1993 have been /will be cancelled as there is a surplus in the Tax Increment Fund. The following table indicates projected revenues and expenses assuming Mr. Rekstad's request is granted. Expenses exceed revenues again in 1992 -1993 for the same reasons as in the first projection. However, expenses also exceed revenues from 1994 -2008. These deficits will have to be eliminated by higher property tax levies. However, overall projected revenues will still exceed expenses by $94,6130 City of Maplewood Cottages of Maplewood Project Tax Increment Housing District #1 -3 Projected Revenues and Expenses (A) On 9 -11 -89 the City Council gave preliminary approval on the 1989 Tax Exempt Tax Increment Bonds. The agenda report (1 -2) indicated that part of the debt service costs on the bonds (26 %) would be financed by the tax increment produced by the Cottages of Maplewood project. The remaining 74% would be financed by property tax levies. On 10 -19 -89 the City Council adopted a resolution for the sale of these bonds. This resolution provided (on page 18) tax levies for the years 1989 through 2008 to pay part of the debt service costs on the bonds. (B) The tax levies payable in 1992 and 1993 have been/will be cancelled as there is a surplus in the Tax Increment Fund. 4 Revenues Expenses Revenues Year Tax 1989 Taxable 1989 Tax- exempt Less Increment Tax T.I. Bonds T.I. Bonds Expenses Revenue Le (A) Total Debt Service Debt Service Total 1992 58,231 (B) 58,231 44,235 101,785 146,020 (87 1993 58,231 (B) 58,231 47 106,035 153,835 (95 1994 58,231 91 149,431 50,949 109,975 160 (11,493) 1995 58,231 95 153 48,886 113 162,482 (9 1996 58 93 151 46 112,052 158,870 (7,259) 1997 58,231 96,830 155 49,520 115 164 (9 1998 58 99,940 158,171 46,985 118,300 165 (7 1999 58 102 160 49,205 120 170,122 (9,201) 2000 58,231 110,140 168,371 50 128,012 178,972 (10 2001 58 111,780 170 47 129 177,042 (7,031) 2002 58 113,030 171 48 130 179,502 (8 2003 58 118,970 177,201 20 165,417 186,297 (9 2004 58,231 119 177 182,849 182 (5 2005 58 123,930 182,161 188 188 (6 2006 58 128 186 193 193 (7 2007 58 131 189,621 197,860 197,860 (8,239) 2008 58,231 133 192,201 200 200,698 (8 2009 58,231 135 194 139,658 139,658 54,353 2010 58 58,231 0 58 2011 58,231 58,231 0 58 2012 58,231 58,231 0 58,231 2013 58,231 58 0 58,231 2014 58,231 58,231 0 58,231 2015 58 58,231 0 58,231 TOTAL 1 397,544 1 805 3 552 448 2 555 643 3 94 613 (A) On 9 -11 -89 the City Council gave preliminary approval on the 1989 Tax Exempt Tax Increment Bonds. The agenda report (1 -2) indicated that part of the debt service costs on the bonds (26 %) would be financed by the tax increment produced by the Cottages of Maplewood project. The remaining 74% would be financed by property tax levies. On 10 -19 -89 the City Council adopted a resolution for the sale of these bonds. This resolution provided (on page 18) tax levies for the years 1989 through 2008 to pay part of the debt service costs on the bonds. (B) The tax levies payable in 1992 and 1993 have been/will be cancelled as there is a surplus in the Tax Increment Fund. 4 OPTIONS The options available to the City Council are as follows: 1. Deny the request. 2. Grant the request. 3. Grant the request but modify the agreement to have the reduction paid back to the City with interest in the future. RECOMMENDATION It would be in the City's best interest financially to deny the request. However, the City Council in the past has supported housing for low and moderate income residents, especially senior citizens. Granting the request would ensure that the Cottages of Maplewood remain a viable project for its current owners. WAAGN\COTTMWRE.AGE 5 LAW OFFICES IE3]1?I GGS AND M411?GAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE (612) 223-6600 FACSIMILE (412) 223-6450 MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE October 22 1992 2400 IDS CENTE$ WRITER - DIRECT DIAL NUMBER MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (612) 334-8400 (612) 223 -6620 FACSIMILE (612) 334-8650 U.11 1 Ci �►� i. City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Dan: I have reviewed the.. Development Agreement between the City of Maplewood and Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership. Article VII of the Development A reement P g discussed the issuance of Tax Increment Bonds and the guarantee of Tax Increment shortfalls with respect to those Bonds. Section 7.4 stated that the annual Tax Increments to be derived from the Development Property in an calendar y ear after 1989 and prior to P � y y P the Maturity Date will exceed the minimum amount needed to pay when due all principal and interest maturing in that year on the Tax Increment Bonds. Tax Increment Bonds are defined to be the General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds issued to finance the cost of the land writedown for the Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership. Maturity Date is defined to be the date when the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds are paid in full. In Section 7.4 the Developer agrees that if for any reason such Tax Increments in any calendar year are less than $75,726 for each year prior to the Maturity Date, then the Developer shall pay, upon demand by the City, to the City the difference between the Tax Increments actually derived and $75,726. in addition, prior to the issuance of the Bonds a Guaranty was executed by Rekstad Resources Inc., and Howard L. Rekstad, guaranteeing the performance of the Developer's obligations under the Development Agreement including the obligation to pay the Tax Increment shortfall. Section 6.1 of the Development Agreement required the Developer to execute an Assessment Agreement which provides for a minimum market . value of $1,800,000 for the Project to remain in effect until December 31, 2009. The purpose of the Tax Increment shortfall guarantee was to make sure that the City received sufficient Tax Increments or guarantee payments to pay the debt service on the $350,000 General Obligation Taxable Tax. Increment Bonds issued for the Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership Project. The purpose of the Assessment Agreement was to ensure that that Tax Increments would remain at the level expected under the Development Agreement through 2009 because it was the intent of the City to utilize Tax Increments from the Tats Increment Financing District established for the Cottages of BRIGGS AND MORGA.N Dan Faust October 22, 1992 Page 2 Maplewood Limited Partnership Project for other eligible tax increment expenses after the Tax Increment Bonds were paid in full on February 1, 2003. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Mary L. Ippel MLI: kmi cc: Howard Rekstad CITY OF 1 PLEVVOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B AIAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 [NANCE DEPARTMENT 612 - ??0-45 10 June 4, 1992 Howard Rekstad Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership 5396 North Lexington Shoreview, MN 55126 RE: Development Agreement between the City of Maplewood and Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership Dear Mr. Rekstad: We have received notification from Ramsey County that the tax increments derived from the Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership housing project for the year 1992 will be in the amount of $58,230.62. Section 7.4 of the Development Agreement executed by Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership provides that if the tax increments in any calendar year are less than $75,726 for each year prior to the maturity date of the bonds, then Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership shall pay, upon demand by the City, to the City the difference between the tax increments and $75,726. Therefore, the City is hereby making a demand that Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership pay to the City within 30 days the sum of $17,495.38. Sincerely, Daniel F. Faust Finance Director Iz HNANMCOTTAGFS.LTA Equal Opporttuut3 Employer iwr��..�.�.wnww�w ■ ' 7� JUL 2 9 June 23, 1992 Mr. Michael McQuire City Manager City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Compliance with the Development Agreement between the City of Maplewood and Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership. 1. Dear Mr. McQuire: I am writing in r #espouse to correspondence I have received from Daniel F. Faust and our conversation in your office on Wednesday, June 17th. The issue at hand is the granting of a tax reduction for the Village on Woodlynn by Ramsey County and the ensuing discrepancy between the amount of taxes paid and the amount called for by Sect. 7.4 of the Development Agreement. I am sorry that we are now trying to construct a tracking for this transaction. You will recall that you and I visited about this matter in the fall of '91 in hopes that all of the proper steps would be taken prior to our receiving this reduction in taxes due. I have been in touch with your legal counsel and I know that it was her desire that matters be handled in their proper order. From the standpoint of the necessity of this reduction I must inform you that without such relief, the Village on Woodlynn is not viable. In addition to this relief, I was forced, as the General Partner, to go to each of the limited partners and request an infusion of additional capital. There is one basic reason for this cash shortfall: At the time of forecasting revenues, it was appropriate to anticipate a yearly increase in rents of 5 %. Under the direction of HUD we are only able to increase our rents approximately 3 %. Now for a word on the process of receiving this tax relief. I made an ititial contact with a member of the County staff as to the possibility of receiving any relief of taxes. Several months passed. One day we were notified of the project qualifying under Sect 4 of the tax code for relief in light of the fact that 60'/0 of the units are set aside for folks in the low to moderate income levels. The amount of the reduction was later determined by the County. 1 P w My request to you and the City Council is that you will amend the agreement to allow the Village on Woodlynn to reduce the taxes due as stipulated by the County. I am also requesting that we be gamed a reduction in the total amount due and an extension on the term to allow us to pay to the City of Maplewood that amount now agreed upon. Thank you for your consideration. I am available to meet with you and the Council at your convenience. The Village pn Woodlynn is an asset to the City and we want to do everything possible to continue with it. Cordially, THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD L.P. Howard L. Rekstad General Partner July 23, 1992 Mr. Michael McQuire -i City Manager City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Process for the amending the Development Agreement between the City of Maplewood and Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership. Dear Mr. McQuire: I was finally able to meet last week with Mary Ippel, the City's legal counsel, to determine the steps necessary to amend the Development Agreement between the City and the Cottages of Maplewood Limited Partnership. Mary assured me that it is not necessary to hold a public meeting for this matter. Assuming the Council will approve our request to reduce the amount of taxes due from $75,000 to $58 1 230 per year, there are two actions available. The first alternative would be to merely replace the number $75,000 with $58,230 in Section 7.4 of the Agreement. The second alternative, assuming the Council would seek to receive an amount different than the $58 would be to amend Section 7.4 to reflect the agreement. I appreciate your openness to working with us and look forward to a speedy resolution of this situation. Enclosed is a copy of my letter to you of June 23, 1992. I anticipate meeting with each member of the Council prior to being placed on the Agenda. Thank.you. If you have any suggestions I can be reached at either 525 -2308 or 483 -9788. Cordially, THE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD L.P. Howard L. Rekstad General Partner aim AGENDA NO* S14 A AGENDA REPORT T 0 O'* PROM: n1pa DATRO Cit Mana Finance Directorr Action b Council Endorsed. Modified., Rejected. Date POLICY ON PILING CONCILIATION COURT CLAIMS FOR AMBULANCE BILLS October 28, 1992 On N ovember 9. 19-87 the Council adopted the polic that the balance due on an ambulance bill must be e to at least three times the filin fee in order for a claim to be filed in Conciliation.. Court. Attached is a cop of the a report on this polic which contains additional information, Currentl we have a Cit emplo that has refused to pa the remainin $49 bal.ance an an ambul:ance, bill.. The ori bill was $245 and the emplo insurance compan paid $ Since the court filin fee is now $18, this bill has not been filed in court because the balance due is not three times the filin fee,, Conse the bill will be on the list of accounts to be written off. As. an alternat ive:,, the Council could adopt a different polic on filin conciliation Court claims for emplo ambulance billso The rationale for a different polic for emplo would be that the City could easil g arnish the empl o fs wa after a court jud is obtained. One alternative polic would be to file a court claim' and g arnish an emplo wa if the balance due on an. ambulance bill is e to or exceeds the court filin fee. This matter is bein presented to the Council to determine if unpaid emplo ambulance bills should be handled differentl than other bills. w : \ a g n \ empamb .\agn\empamb, AGENDA NUMBER �.... INTRODUCTION It has been past policy to file claims in conciliation court on unpaid ambulance bills with a balance in excess of $20. The Court. f i 1 i ng fee . is added to the claim filed i n Court. Approximately 72% of the bills filed in Court are paid and 50% of the filing fees are paid. Bills unpaid after Court action are referred to a collection agency. BACKGROUND Ramsey Coun has raised the f i 1 i ng fee three times si J anuary, 1986 and it is currently $11 on small cl aims (see attached) . Because of this, the olic r the minimum amount of a bill to file in Court should P Y 9 9 be changed. In addition, the criteria should be flexible so that the minimum amount will increase automatically as the filing fee increases. RECOMMENDATIO14 i s recommended that the new policy c It p Y be that the unpaid ambulance b i l l balance must be equal to at least three times the f i l i n g fee. Based upon current fil ee rates this new olicy would require the unpaid balance g P be at least $33. $44 ' The claims fled i n Court on a bill of this amount soul d be (�33 + c potential filing 1 i n g fee } . This policy i Y would eliminate the poten of having fees exceed 50% of the unpaid bill. In conjunction with this, • bills too small for Conciliation Court would be referred to a collection agency if they were $10 or more. ACTION REQUIRED Council approval of th e new policy olic that the u npaid ambulance bill balance P must be equal to at least three times the fil fee in order for a claim to be filed in Conciliation Court. DFF :inb Action by Council: AGENDA REPORT Endorse t Modif i e • TO. i Ma C it y g .Re j ecte Z1 - 2 4� Date FROM: Finance Director RE: Policy on Filing Conciliation Court Claims for Ambulance Bills DATE: October 28, 1987 INTRODUCTION It has been past policy to file claims in conciliation court on unpaid ambulance bills with a balance in excess of $20. The Court. f i 1 i ng fee . is added to the claim filed i n Court. Approximately 72% of the bills filed in Court are paid and 50% of the filing fees are paid. Bills unpaid after Court action are referred to a collection agency. BACKGROUND Ramsey Coun has raised the f i 1 i ng fee three times si J anuary, 1986 and it is currently $11 on small cl aims (see attached) . Because of this, the olic r the minimum amount of a bill to file in Court should P Y 9 9 be changed. In addition, the criteria should be flexible so that the minimum amount will increase automatically as the filing fee increases. RECOMMENDATIO14 i s recommended that the new policy c It p Y be that the unpaid ambulance b i l l balance must be equal to at least three times the f i l i n g fee. Based upon current fil ee rates this new olicy would require the unpaid balance g P be at least $33. $44 ' The claims fled i n Court on a bill of this amount soul d be (�33 + c potential filing 1 i n g fee } . This policy i Y would eliminate the poten of having fees exceed 50% of the unpaid bill. In conjunction with this, • bills too small for Conciliation Court would be referred to a collection agency if they were $10 or more. ACTION REQUIRED Council approval of th e new policy olic that the u npaid ambulance bill balance P must be equal to at least three times the fil fee in order for a claim to be filed in Conciliation Court. DFF :inb AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by Co' unc L Endorsed .. TO: City Manager Modified__. FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer District 22, City Project 91 -1 O- Change Order 1 DATE: November 2, 1992 Introduction It is proposed to change this construction contact by adding temporary repairs in three locations to the existing truss pipe south of County Road C. It is also proposed to delete planned chemical grouting of four manholes and add chemical grouting of three other manholes. The net increase in cost is $2,465. Background It was noted in the June 30, 1992, agenda report "the existing trunk sewer south of County Road C was televised along with the rest of the project area. This sewer, which was built in the early 1970's with controversial truss pipe, was seen to be in extremely poor condition. In .fact, this sewer is so deflected from grade (i.e., it has numerous severe sags in the pipe) that it is not cost - effective to line. This sewer will have a greatly decreased service life due to the excessive stress that the sags put on the vulnerable joints of this pipe. The city should begin to allocate funds for the open -cut replacement of this sewer." No permanent repairs to this section were incorporated into the current contract. Repairs will need to be made by another type of construction (open cut). It will cost in excess of $.500,000. However, there are three locations on this line with intense joint leakage. According to the estimate of the television report, the leakage at these three bad joints is 10 gallons per minute. It was decided to discuss the cost of temporary grouting of these bad joints with the contractor during construction. These temporary repairs were not included in the contract because there are a number of different methods to do this work. As shown on the attached lump sum quote, the temporary spot repairs will cost $4,875. The repairs may stop leakage of about 5 gallons per minute overall. That is, the active leaks may be stopped, but some minor leaks may increase at other locations, which is the trouble with spot repairs. Even so, the cost to treat 5 gpm of leakage is $3,040 per year. Therefore, it can be assumed that the temporary repairs would pay for themselves in less than two years. If the total reconstruction of the defective truss pipe is more than about three years away, then the repair investment makes sense. The contract includes chemically grouting a number of manholes outside of District 22. These manholes were initially identified as having severe leakage. These manholes have been checked again and four are seen to have only seasonal or minor leakage that does. not justify grouting. The full. cost of this proposed work would be saved if deleted because they were bid as individual lump sum items. During the some review, it was found that three other manholes would be cost effective to grout. It is fitting to note here the exceptional cooperation and assistance provided by Sonny Nuteson, Ed Nadeau and other members of sewer maintenance. The deletion of four planned manholes. saves $7,405. The addition of three manholes to be grouted adds $4,995. Recommendation It is recommended that the contractor's proposal to make temporary repairs on the sewer west of Rainbow Foods be accepted. Together with recommended changes in manholes to be grouted, the net increase in .contract cost is $2,465. It is recommended that the extra financing be from the sanitary sewer fund. AD jc Attachment RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 91 -10 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated as Improvement Project 91 -10 Change Order 1. NOW, THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 1 in the amount of $2,465. The project budget is amended to $432,46.5. The project financing is amended as follows: Sanitary sewer fund $432,465 O C T 2 1 1992 October 19) 1992 Quote's 20492 Mr. Bruce Irish Assistant Cit En 1.830 E. Count Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Bruce, Thank y ou for takin an interest in the Link pipe repair for joint s and manhole g routin g behind R Foods, We ori discussed usin a 24" Link -Pipe .repair sleeve to repair one broken j oint and to u se a packer to g rout two additional j oints. I ha evaluated the set-up time and determined that I can g ive y ou a better price to install three Link-Pipe repair sleeves, 3 Link Pipe repair sleeves installed @ $925.00 -each .$2775.00 2.Grout manholes to stop leaka @ $625.00 each $1250.00 2 Furnish and install internal chimne seals @ $280.00 each 560.00 I Furnish and install. i internal seal extension @ $160.00 each $ 160.00 2 Furnish and install rainstopper lid sea @ $65,00 each $ 130'.00 TOTAL OF REPAIRS $4875.00 2700 East 33.rd Street 9 Minneapolis, MN 55406 9 ( 612 ) 722-2203 * Fax ( 612 ) 722-0003 Mr. Bruce Irish October 19. 1992 Page Two I believe i have given you literature and technical information on all of the proposed processes in the past. Please let me know if you need additional Information. Sincerely, obert M. Thu] Vice President, Rehab northern water works supply ( techniflow corporation) TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM. AGENDA REPORT otion by Councio City Manager Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Sterling- Linwood, City Project 87- 45— Change Order 3 DATE: November 2, 1992 Introduction Attached is a change order in the amount of $38,710 for street work on Sterling Street. The extra cost is fully covered by state aid funding. No additional city funds are required. Background The additional street work is for removal of unstable soil two feet deep under the street. The material is to be replaced with coarse sand. This procedure (aka sand su6cut) was part of the plans for work on Linwood. It was included on Linwood because the soils were marginal and it was necessary to avoid any source of delay so that the road and driveways could be successfully paved prior to winter. A "sand subcut" was not part of the original plans for Sterling from Hillwood to Linwood. The soils were also known to be marginal, i.e., can be an acceptable road base if dry or may turn to slop if wet. However, there was no traffic or, local access to maintain since it was a new road. It was decided to wait and actually see the condition of the soils during construction. After a period of rain it was observed and found wanting. The contractor agreed to do the sand subcut for the same unit prices as bid for Linwood. As noted before, all of this cost, plus 16 percent for engineering and other expenses, is eligible for municipal state aid funding. Recommendation It is recommended that Change Order 3 be approved. BAI jc Attachment CHANGE ORDER ENGINEERS /.ARCHITECTS ■ PLANNERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 -5108 612 490 -2000 800 325 -2055 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 16, 1992 OWNER DATE n CITY PROJECT NO. 87 -45, S.A.P. 138 - 120 -01 3 OWNER'S PROJECT NO. STERLING ST REET UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following changes shall be made to the contract documents Description: �TE_M 2105.501 Common Excavation (P) 2105.522 Select Granular Borrow (CV) 2502.541 4" P.E. Perf. Pipe Drain w /sock Purpose of Change Order: Unstable soils were encountered from Station 27 +27 (Linwood Ave.) to Station 38 +71 (Hifiwood Drive). The unstable soils will be subcut 2 feet and replaced with granular material. UNIT C.Y. C.Y. L.F. EST. UNIT QTR PRICE 3,500 3.40 3,900 5.40 2,300 2.50 CHANGE ORDER NO. 92004.01 SEH FILE NO TOTAL EST. PRICE $11,900.00 21,060.00 $38„7,10.00 SAP 138 - 120 -01 PARTICIPATING $11,900.00 21,060.00 7 $38,710.00 Basis of Cost: CJ Actual EXEstimated Attachments list sup documents) . pp 9 Contract Status Time Cost Or ig in a l n rant $573,876.95 Cont t 0;;' n Prior C. 0.' to s 1 �- + ,400.00 Net Change Th +38,710 1 .00 Change This C.O. Revised Contract 1 Recommended for Approval. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC. By. k enneth R. Meister, P.11. Agreed by Contractor: F. M. Frattalone Exc., Inc. er TITLE� Approved for Owner: City of Maplewood, MN BY Mn7DOT, Metro Division State -Aid Engineer Distribution Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative 1 SEH Office 1 SNORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST CLOUD. MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, Wl MADISON, WI RESOLUTION DIRECTING MODIFICATION, OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota. has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 87 -45 and has. let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter -429 and WHEREAS, it is now .necessary and expedient that said contract be modified and designated. as Improvement Project 87 -45 Change Order 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, .MINNESOTA that the mayor and city clerk are hereby authorized and directed_ to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Order 3 in the amount of $38,710. The project budget is increased by $44,900. The increase is to be funded by municipal state aid. AGENDA NO. TO: FROM: RE: DATE: AGENDA REPORT City Manager Assistant City Manager 4J ion b Endorsed Modifi e ej, APPROVAL OF PURCHASE: 2134 WHITE BEAR AVENUE November 2, 1992 INTRODUCTION The construction of the community center is moving forward. The exact location of the building on the site needs to be determined as soon as possible. It is recommended that the City purchase the Wicklander's property at 2134 White Bear Avenue for part of the community center site. A copy of the site map is attached. BACKGROUND Braun Engineering conducted extensive soils tests on the existing ten acre site as well as some points at Mr. Wicklander's property line. The tests showed that the soils become substantially more stable as you move farther north on White Bear Avenue. Based on these tests, the architect is recommending that the City locate the community center building as far north as possible to take advantage of the more stable soils. -- - - -- The - parcel is .302- acres with 75 feet of frontage on White - Bear- Avenue, A New York real estate firm owns the .25 acre vacant site to the north as well as the .60 acre site of the bakery on the corner of white Bear Avenue and County Road B. Currently, the Wicklander's maintain the small vacant lot on their north side. The reasons for moving the building farther north are numerous. As the building is currently designed, the poorest soils are underneath the pool component. This means that the southeastern corner of the building would require special, more expensive foundation work. The architects have evaluated turning the building or moving the pool component, but this location of the pool was chosen to access the sun light and the view of the pond. If the building was moved northward, the cost of the foundation would be substantially less expensive. Other benefits of obtaining the Wicklander property and moving the building farther north are that the natural environment of the pond would be less impacted; there would be more room for parking and site amenities on the south end; and the most appropriate long -term plan for the site is obtaining the property up to the corner of White Bear Avenue and County Road B. The City has negotiated a purchase price with Mr. Wicklander of $146,000. This price includes the property, home, and all relocation costs for which the City is responsible to Pay RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into an agreement to purchase the parcel owned by Mr. Arthur Wicklander at 2134 White Bear Avenue for $146,000 which includes all costs associated with relocation. tmc Attachment i 2146 M I TE -Coo QW Lo bo =MOM i rp .� .. B � �U� -� ' /•! , o ' . t ,� • • .a3 .c . I 1 i lO �j�) (AL1 (a•) /aii 010 ta•) _ t &See cl 120 � t1 L ,� r � � . I `lfl 1 TE - : . >,.a... p Y CITY X20 i ,,� AVEWE t � � � !� TSTa,� s ' do ` 0 C I TY HALL � < < �► • " PUBLIC t� 01 742 ac TO CITY O j MAPLEYVOOD /2 - 2, 9 - 7G WORKS BUILDING , I �� 0 .�: -.- � • PEARSON goo • _ _ _ �' E , V `• _ .• • `* o c N •- - 2050 V11 ITE _ : _• _ BEAR AVEqUt oeo MONETTE CONSTRUCT I W •. 1 "- :: "• Ram I 1.42 •wt.) . 30 • .Ac-t-ion b Counc3j I MEMORANDUM 700OW6 Date— Mo dif 10. e .lei e c t e 0 To Michael A. McGuire, Cit Mana From: Robert D. Ode Director of Parks & Recreation. S ubj: Demolition of Buildin at Herita Center (2005 Ed Date: October 22, 1992 In Due to the condition of the Maplewood Herita Center, we have not used this facilit for an meetin other than than the Senior Citizen g roup which is attended b a cit staff person, This fall we made arran to have the Senior Citizen g roup meet at the Hazelwood Fire Station facilit It is recommended that the Cit Council approve the use of the facilit for fire drills and to approve the demolition of the house and barn. Back Approximatel two y ears a staff was re to attempt to determine the cost of repairin the Herita Center. Two g eneral contractors were contacted at that time. After presentin their , best estimates, it was decided not to expend over $65,000.00 to repair the house. At this time, it would be estimated that there would be g reat additional costs to meet all of the new American With Disabilitoft ti es ies Act re Fire Marshal. Jim Embertson has been contacted as to the interest of the Fire Departments in usin the home for fire drills. He has indicated that Fire Companies are willin to use the build- in for smoke and fire drills,. Prior to the start of the drills we: should make arran to seal the well and disconnect the sewer, (This could be accomplished while permits are bein ac- q uired). At the conclusion of the final burn, the house and barn would be demolished and the site cleaned up, includin removal of the foundation and replacin with fill. The Fire Departments would like to start this fall ( November) and complete the burn sometime in Januar Recommendation It is recommended that the Fire Marshal be directed to prepare the proper forms for permittin the use of the Maplewood Herita Center at 2005 Ed to be used for fire drills. The Cit Council also authorizes the expenditure of Commercial PAC Funds for the sealin of the well, disconnectin the sewer, final cleanup of the area., and an other miscellaneous costs. c *, Cit Clerk AGENDA NO. In owl_ AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: City Manager ndorsed FROM. Assistant City Manager rep Red eeted-. Date . RE: MEETINGS SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 1992 DATE: November 2, 1992 This is just a reminder of the meetings currently scheduled for December 1992. If the City Council would like any meeting changed or added, this would be an opportunity to do so. Pp tY Thursday, December 10: 4:30 .m. Pre-agenda p g 7:00 P.M. Special meeting for the adoption of the proposed 1993 Budget Monday, December 14: 7:00 p.m. Regular City Council meeting Wednesday, December 16: 7:00 p.m. If necessary, continuation of 1993 Budget meeting Thursday, December 24: 4:30 p.m. Pre - agenda meeting Monday, December 28: 7:00 p.m. Regular City Council meeting tmc