Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 09-28 City Council PacketMEETING TO COMMENCE AT 6:00 P.M. AGENDA A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 6:00 P.M., Monday, September 28, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No, 92 -18 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting September 10, 1992 2. Minutes of Meeting 92 -17 (September 14, 1992) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Counci 1 and w i l l be enacted by one motion. There w i l l be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. le Approval of Claims 2, Financial Transfers to Close Rejected Improvement Projects 3, Lot Division Time Extension: 1230 E. Sterling St. (Ski Jump) 49 .Conditional Use Permit Review: 1255 Cope Avenue. (Northern Hydraulics) 5. Shoreland Ordinance Grant 6. Authorization to Place Sewer Connection Costs on Taxes: 2240 Hazelwood G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 6 :00 P.M., Continuation of Proposed Community Center Project 2. 7 :00 P.M., County Road C, T.H.61 - Hazelwood, Project 89 -04 (4 Votes) 30 8:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: Highway 61 (Carnival Play Systems) 4. 8:15 P.M., House Moving: County Road C (Thone Builders) 5. 8:30 P.M., 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. (First Evangelical Free Church) Conditional Use Permit Revision Design Review 6. 8 :45 P.M., 743 N. Century Ave. (Holiday Station Store) Conditional Use Permit Design Review 7. 9:00 P.M., Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance (1st Reading) H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Building P1an.Review Procedure Ordinance (1st Reading) 2. Assessment Objections: Projects 86 -27; 87 -01; 88 -12; and 90 -14 3. Full Time Police Officer J* NEW BUSINESS 1. Resident Request - No Parking on McKnight 2, Parking Design Approval and Site Plan Change Related to Tax Increment - Maplewood Mall 3. Tax Exempt Financing - HealthEast 4. Attorney Presentations: Resolution of Amended Assessment K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 2. 3. 4. N. ADNINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. N. ADJOURNMENT COUNCILIMANAGER MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD r 4:30 p.m., Thursday, September 10, 1,992 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in thee Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:34 parrill B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Councilperson Dale Carlson Present Councilperson Fran Juker Present Councilperson George Rossbach Present Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Finance Director Daniel Faust Assistant Finance Director Rick Hangsleben C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was amended as follows: E. DISCUSSION TOPICS 6. OTHER BUDGET - RELATED ITEMS a. North St. Paul /Maplewood Police Department Councilmember Zappa .moved that the agenda be approved. as amended. The motion was seconded by Mayor Bastian and approved. Ayes: All D. 1993 BUDGET OVERVIEW City Manager McGuire and Finance Director Faust presented a summary of the proposed 1993 Budget. There was some discussion about possible changes to the budget due to the contract with Landfall for police services; cancellation of some public works improvement projects; and reduction of park service levels. 1 E. DISCUSSION ITEMS 1. Fire Department Contracts City Manager McGuire reported that since the Fire Departments did not submit the required budget request documentation, the proposed 1993 Budget includes the same amount of money for the Fire Department contracts as was spent in 1992. It was the consensus of the City Council that the 1993 payments be the same as the 1992 amounts until such time the Fire Departments submit the correct information. 2. Contribution to Firefighters' Relief Association City Manger McGuire reported that the cities of Maplewood, Oakdale and Landfall are still negotiating with the Firefighters' Relief Association through regular meetings and continuing actuarial studies for defined contribution vs. defined benefit plans. In addition, he stated that the proposed 1993 Budget includes the same amount for the City's contribution as 1992. 3. Utility Charges 1992 vs. 1993 Finance Director Faust presented the recommended increases in utility rates for 1993 including water (hydrant charge), sewer service, and recycling charge. There was some discussion about the costs associated with recycling and Council again requested that representatives from Ramsey County and NSP attend aCouncil /Manager meeting to provide more information. 40 Use of Charitable Gambling Proceeds Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the report on possible uses of the 10% of net profits fund. Following some discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council that within the next two weeks, each Councilmember would submit to the City Manager a list of projects that they would like to see funded with the charitable gambling proceeds. Staff was directed to verify the legality of those possible expenditures. Mayor Bastian left the meeting at 7:13 p.m. 5. Truth -In- Taxation Requirements Assistant Finance Director Hangsleben reviewed the calendar of dates for proposed property taxes, public hearings and final properly taxes for payable 1993. 6. Other Budget - Related Items a. North St. Paul /Maplewood Police Department City Manager McGuire reported on the recent talks with North St. Paul about consolidating the police departments of North St. Paul and Maplewood. K F. CERTIFICATION OF DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAXES Councilperson Zappa moored that he Citv's public hearing on the 1993 Budget be scheduled for Thursday., December 10, 19921 7:00 p.m., and the continuation hear. i ng, , if necessa be held -on Wednesday, December 16, 7:00 p.m. at City, Hall_ The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and approved. Ayes: Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa Nays: Juker Absent Bastian G. ADOPTION OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 1993 Councilperson Zappa introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 92 -09 -109 WHEREAS, State law requires that the City Council give preliminary approval of a proposed tax levy for 1992 payable in 1993 by September 15, 1992; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Proposed 1993 Budget and has determined that the proposed tax levy payable in 1993 is the maximum amount that will be levied. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THAT the proposed tax levy for 1992 payable in 1993 in the amount of $7,415,200 is hereby given preliminary approval. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Carlson and approved. Ayes: Carlson, Juker, Rossbach and Zappa Nays: None Absent: Mayor Bastian G. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. 3 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 14, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 92 -17 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meetin g of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Councilg Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE.OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Frances L. Juker, Councilmember George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of Meeting 92 -16, August 24, 1992 Present Present Present Present Present Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 92 -16 August 244 1992) as corrected: Co. Councilmember Zappa was at the meeting at 7:00. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Agenda as amended: 1740 Van Dyke - Builder's Square L-2*1 Portable Signs L -30 Real Estate Signs /Parade of Homes L -4. Residence at 1600 E. County Road C L -5. Local Partnership Act of 1992 L -6. Music in Rental Halls L-7* Council Initiated Rezoning - Prosperity North of MnDOT J-49 Service for Al J i rovec Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Mayor Bastian moved to waive the Rules of Procedure and limit discussion of Item G -11 to one hour and continue the hearing to September 28, 1992 from 6 :00 to 7:00 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all EA. PRESENTATIONS 1 8 -24 -92 F. CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Zappa moved, seconded by Councilmember Rossbach; ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda items 1, 2, 4, and 5 as recommended. (Item 3 j% ke mnvnti +n hnrnmo .1_rN 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 653,860.31 S, 444,151.86 1,098,012.17 PAYROLL: $ 201 S 41,72159 243 11,341,693.03 Checks #23467 - #23552 Dated 8 -13 -92 thru 8 -31 -92 Checks #18255 - #18424 Dated 9 -14 -92 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks #28182 thru #28351 Dated 8 -28 -92 Payroll Deduction Checks #28356 thru 28371 dated 8 -28 -92 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 2. Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce Resolution of Support 92 - 09 - 110 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT WHEREAS, the Suburban Area chamber of Commerce has served our area for over fifteen years; and WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce is the only business and professional organization i,n our area studying business and legislativeP issues from the single suburban perspective; and WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and dialogue among our city leaders, businesses, schools and surrounding communities; and WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce is a positive voice for our City and the surrounding suburban area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I. Mayor Gary Bastian, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, declare our support for the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce as an independent voice for business in our community. 3. Change of Manger: Olive Garden Moved to J -5 2 8 -24 -92 0 4. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1285 Cope Avenue (Englewood Shops) Approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit at 1285 Cope Avenue, to be reviewed again in five years. 50 Final Payment: Footprint Lake - Project 87 -32 92 - 09 - 111 ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has determined that Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, City Project 87 -32, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that city Project 87 -32 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the City. Release of any retainage in the amount of $92,245.87 less $40,0.00.00 as agreed liquidated damages for late completion, is hereby authorized. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7;00 P.M., Proposed Community Center Project a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed Community Center Project. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. C& City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing,. calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Emil Sturzenegger, 2481 Londin Lane (Conemara) - (No) Ralph Gear, 2505 Minnehaha (No) Tobin, 1930 Kingston (No) Pokorny, 2314 Nebraska (Had Questions) Les Axdahl, 2209 Payne Avenue (No - also presented a letter) William A. Thompson, 1939 Flandrau (Had Questions) Steve Ganish, 2191 Stanich (In favor) Lee Jasinski, 2358 Linwood Ave. (Against) Sharon Krause, 2400 Linwood Ct. (Against) Steve Gunn, 1206 Lealand (In favor) Pat Svendsen, 1133 Ripley Ave. E (In favor) ADA and Senior Citizen Committee) Shawn Jones, Heritage Center - 3rd year student at Hamline (In Favor) Marie Spielman, 1991 Stanich Ct. (In favor) Bob Casci, 2018 Dieter Street (Against) e. 1 Hour having passed, the Hearing was continued to September 28, 1992 from 6:00 to 7 :00 P.N. Mayor Bastian called -for a 5- minute recess. Mayor Bastian reconvened the meeting at 8:23 P.N. 3 8 -24 -92 2. 7:30 P.N. (8:24 P.N.), Assessment Hearing - Holloway Ave., Project 87 -14 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding assessments for Project 87 -14, Holloway Avenue. b. Assistant City Manager.Maglich presented the staff report. c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedures for the public hearing. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared.. f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 9 Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 09 - 112 ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL - PROJECT 87 -14 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Holloway Avenue, east from Beebe Road, north to Furness Street, as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 87 -14, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nineteen (19) years , the. first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 19920 To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself i n the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4 8 -24 -92 M 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not,herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized-by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember.Rossbach Ayes - all 3. 7:40 P.M. (8:30 P.M.), Assessment Hearing - Roselawn Ave., Jackson -Rice, Project 87 -01 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding assessments for Project 87 -01, Roselawn Avenue, Jackson to Rice. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. City Attorney Kelley explained the procedures for the public hearing. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. e . Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Jerry Anderson, 1908 Rice Street (18- 29 -22 -32 -0021) f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 09 - 113 ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL - PROJECT 8741 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed on all Objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Roselawn Avenue, Jackson Street to Rice Street, as descri bed in the files of the City Clerk as Project 87 -01, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 5 8 -24 -92 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nineteen (19) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first instal l merit . shal 1 be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 19929 To each subsequent. installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid i nstal l'ments . 30 It is hereby declared.to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself i n the future for the portion of the. cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 40 To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 4. 7:50 P.M. (8:38 P.M.), Assessment Hearing - U61- County Road B Storm Sewer, Project 90 -14 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding assessments for TH61 - County Road B Storm Sewer, Project 90 -14. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Jody and Gregory McElroys, 1258 E. County Road B Joe Cychilski, owner of property at Lealand and Duluth John Westlund, 1237 Lealand Kay Fehring (09- 29 -22 -44 -0076) e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 6 8 -24 -92 f. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 -09 -114 ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL - PROJECT 90 -14 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City.Council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of TH61 - County Road B Storm Sewer, as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 90 -14, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included i s hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nineteen (19) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shal 1 be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of t h i s improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of t h i s assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 7 8 -24 -92 5. 8:00 P M. (8:56 P.M.), Assessment Hearing - Beam Ave., West of TH61: Project 88 -12 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding assessments for Beam Avenue west of TH61, Project 88 -12. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. C* City Attorney Kelly previously explained the procedures for the public hearing. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard. Mike Hawkes, 2957 Frank Street (04- 29- 22 -13- 0030) Louis Gilland, 2994 Carey Heights Drive Tom McGraw Resident (O'Brien) 2961 Edward Street Dave Sells f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 09 - 115 ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL - PROJECT 88 -12 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper, notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Beam Avenue, TH 61 to County Road D. as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 90 -14, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nineteen (19) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1993, and. shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 19920 To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying 8 8 -24 -92 additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any.portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such .1 ater extension for improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembens Carlson, Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian 6. 8:30 P.M. (9:27 P.M.), Assessment Hearing Larpenteur Ave., I -35E - Edgerton: Project 86 -27 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding assessments for Larpenteur Avenue, I -35E to Edgerton, Project 86 -27. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedures for the hearing. d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard. Stella Nelson, 1706 Edgemont (17- 29 -22 -33 -0024) f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 09 - 116 ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL - PROJECT 86 -27 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed on all to the proposed assessment for the construction of Larpenteur Avenue east from I -35E to Edgerton Street (CSAH 58), as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 90 -14, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, 9 8 -24 -92 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 20 Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of nineteen (19) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January 1993, and shal 1 bear i nterest at the rate of 75 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first i nstal l ment shall be added i nterest on the entire assessment from the date of th.i -s resolution until December 31, 19920 To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement aid for from municipal funds by levyingPpaid additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 40 To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 7. 9:00 P.M. (9:45 P.M.), Northwood Village: a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the Northwood Village development. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. R 10 8 -24 -92 d. Commissioner Gerke presented the Planning Commission Report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Mario Cochiarella, the developer Bonnie Ziemet, 2241 Birmingham - also represented Jeff Williams, Barclay Street f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Land Use Plan g. Council member Zappa introduced the followinq Resolution and moved its adoptio= 92 - 09 - 117 LAND USE CHANGE PLAN WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development started a change to the City's land use plan from RM (residential medium- density) to RL (residential low - density). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located between Birmingham Street and the railroad right -of -way between County Road B and Cope Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 17, 1992. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the plan amendment be approved. 2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on September 14, 1992. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change for the following reason: 1. The developer is proposing to develop this site for single dwellings. 2. The City has zoned the site R -1 (single - dwelling residential). 3. The surrounding properties have single dwellings. 4. This change would reduce the allowable density and traffic from this property. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 11 8 -24 -92 Street and Alley Vacation h. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption 92 - 09 - 118 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the vacation of the following-described street: The part of Lark Avenue which is between the northerly extensions of the east and west lines of Block 6 of Sabin Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows. 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street signed a petition for this vacation; 2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on August 22, 19929 They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 3* The City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1992, City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 12 through 22, Block 3 and Lots 1 through 12, Block 6, Sabins Addition to Gladstone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City does not need this right -of -way because the developer will be dedicating new street rights -of -way on the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all i. Council.member Zappa introduced the following ResOlution and moved its adoption: 92- 09 - 119 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the vacation of the 12 8 -24 -92 r following- described street The part of Laurie Road, which lies between the southerly extension of Lots 13 -22, Block 6 of Sabin Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1 . A majority of the property owners abutting t h i s street signed a petition for this vacation; 2. The Planning Commission discussed t h i s vacation on August 22, 19920 They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent not i ces ' to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 13 -22, Block 6 and Lots 4 -14, Block 11, Sabin Addition to Gladstone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City does not need this right -of -way, because the developer w i l l be dedicating a new street rights -of -way on the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all j. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 09 - 120 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the vacation of the following- described street: The part of Sandhurst Avenue which is between the southerly extensions of the west line of Block 11 in the Sabin Addition to Gladstone and the east line of Lot 22 of Block 11 in Sabin Addition to Gladstone. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street signed a petition for t h i s vacation; 2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on August 22, 1992, 13 8 -24 -92 V They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 3. The City Council held a public hearing.on September 14, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property w i l l go to the following abutting properties: Lots 15 -22, Block 11 and Lots 7 -11, Block 14, Sabin Addition to Gladstone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City does not need t h i s right -of -way, because the developer w i l l be dedicating new street rights --of -way on the final plat. This vacation is subject to retaining a permanent drainage and utility easement over, across and through the following - described property. To wit: That part of the vacated Sandhurst Avenue right -of -way lying westerly of and between, the southerly extension of the East line of Lot 17, Block 11, Sabin Addition to Gladstone and the County Road B right -of -way. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all k. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption. 92 - 09 - 121 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the vacation of the following- described alley: The alley in Block 3, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this alley signed a petition for this vacation; 2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on August 22, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on September 14, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written 14 8 -24 -92 statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. 4 WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 1 -22, Block 3, Addition to Gladstone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons. 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. The developer will be dedicating new street rights -of -way on the final plat. This vacation is subject to the retention of a drainage and utility easement over the alley. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Preliminary Plat 1. Council member Zappa moved to approve the Northwood Village _prel i mi nary plan subject to the following conditions 1. The City Engineer approving final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans. The developer shall increase the size of the water main to eight inches on the utility plan. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. 2. The developer shall sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer will complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. This agreement shall include the developer having NSP install up to three street lights at the discretion of the City Engineer. 3. The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan, based on the City's environmental protection ordinance. The Director must approve this plan before the developer does any site grading or the City approves the final plat. 4. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. 5. Change the property lines on Lots 2, 3 and 4. This change shall be so the property lines are perpendicular to Laurie Road and radial to the Ide Street cul -de -sac. 6. Change the property line between Lots 20 and 21. This change shall be so the property line is radial to the cul'-de -sac. 15 8 -24 -92 7. Change the name of Laurie. Avenue to Laurie Road. 8. Remove the house and two garages on Lots 1 and 2. 9. Remove the house and garage on Lots 17 and 19. 10. Change the right -of -way at the transition point with the cul -de- sacs to meet City standards. 11. Show a 30' wide utility and drainage easement parallel to County Road B on Lot 7. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Zappa Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Parks Tree Plantings: Project 92 -3P a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks & Recreation Odegard presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Rossbach moved to award the bid for pl anti ngs . i n the parks. to Midland Nursery in the amount of $105.208.00, and authorized entering_ unto a contract with Midland Nurseries . Funds for the plantings have been approved previously by Cit_y Council action. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Assessment Objection - McKnight /Highwood: Project 90 -10 a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report, c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Zappa moved to adopt. the staff recommendations regarding appeals to the assessments for Project 90 -10 . as follows Dennis Davidson, 830 Dorl and Road 13- 28 -22 -22 -007.7 No Adjustment Carl and Patricia Maidment, 824 McKnight Road S. 13- 28 -22 -22 -0076 No Adjustment 16 8 -24 -92 0 I Robert F. Nelson, Highwood Avenue 13- 28 -22 -32 -0016 Sharon Lamb, 980 McKnight Road S. 13- 28 -22 -32 -0012 No Adjustment No Adjustment to Amount Council granted variance allowing delay of hookup until 6 -30 -98 unless repair to individual disposal system is required before then. Robert and Kay Hoskins, 1020 McKnight Road S 13- 28 -22 -32 -0013 Reduce assessment by 1 sanitary sewer unit; 1 sanitary sewer service - New Amount: $4,550.00 (Previous Amount 8,050.00)Coun*cil granted variance all owing delay of hookup until 6 -30 -98 unless repair to individual disposal system is required before then. Richard N. Bolinger, 1070 McKnight Road S. 13- 28 -22 -32 -0020 Reduce assessment by 1 sanitary sewer unit; 1 sanitary sewer service - New Amount: $4,550.00 (Previous Amount 8,050.00) Council granted variance allowing delay of hookup until 6 -30 -98 unless repair to individual disposal system is required before then. Brian M. Rembish, 1090 McKnight Road S. 13- 28 -22 -33 -0003 No Adjustment to Amount Council granted variance allowing delay of hookup until 6 -30 -98 unless repair to individual disposal system is required before then. Joe and Delores Wendl, 1060 McKnight Road S. 13- 28 -22 -32 -0019 No Adjustment to Amount Council granted variance allowing delay of hookup until 6 -30 -98 unless repair to individual disposal system is required before then. Thu -Van Tran, 939 Schaller Drive 13- 28 -22 -23 -0039 No Adjustment Ralph J. and Paula J. Curella, 1100 McKnight Road S. 13- 28 -22 -33 -0005 No Adjustment to Amount Council granted variance allowing delay of hookup until 6 -30 -98 unless repair to individual disposal system is required before then. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian 17 8 -24 -92 Councilmember Juker moved to extend the meeting to 11:00 P.M. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Dyes - all 2. Metro 2015 Report a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Commissioner Gerke presented the Planning Commission.report. c. Councilmember Zappa moved to send the letter, as presented. to. the Metropolitan Council. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 3. Kennel License: Reconsideration - 1994 Winthrop a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to deny the application for the kennel 1 icense. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmember Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach c. Mayor Bastian moved to approve the kennel license for 2994 Winthrop subject to staff recommendations. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Counci lmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Zappa 4. 1494 Interchange: Reconsideration a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Carlson reported on the meeting he attended with the Woodbury officials. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: James English, 2518 Linwood Lee Jasi nski , 2358 Linwood Avenue Bob Hoskins, 1020 So. McKnight Mary Martin, 2334 Carver Rod Miller, 2310 Linwood Court Pat Kittrich, 2399 Linwood Court Resident (Kirsch), 2380 Linwood Court Jim Eily, 2410 Linwood Court Shirley Knause, 2100 Linwood Court d. Councilmember Zappa moved to oppose Woodbury's new Alternative A for the J 18 8 -24 -92 I -494 Interchange. Notion failed for Lack of a second. e. Mayor Bastian moved to table this item until l i t i g a t i o n is completed.. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson ayes - Mayor Bastian Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Zappa Councilmember Zappa moved to reconsider the motion to extend the meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 5. Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance (Ist Reading) a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian moved to table this item to the.September 28 meet ng_ Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance (1st Reading) a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian moved to table this item until the September 28 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 2. Full -Time Police Officer a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to table this item until the September 28 meeting. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker 3. Part -Time Dispatcher a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to fill the part -time dispatcher position, Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 19 8 -24 -92 4. Service for Al Jirovec, 2480 Linwood a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Mr. Jirovec requested the Council to extend the project to provide service to his home. C. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve extension of. service to Mr. J_i rovec' s property . Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 5. Change of Manager, Olive Garden a. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the license for Terry O'Neil as Manager for the .O1 i ve .Garden Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. George Supan a. Mr. Supan requested the Council to stop the large trucks traveling on Hazelwood Street. b. Council directed staff to check on this matter and why trucks are using Hazelwood Street, including restriction of permits. L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 20 8 -24 -92 AGENDA NO. F -1 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: AGENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Director APPROVAL OF CLAIMS September 18, 1992 Action by Council .1 Endorsed Modified Rejected.., Dat e It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: 84003.54 120, 527.84 961,411.38 PAYROLL: 199, 952.92 42, 235.93 242,188.85 1 Checks # 23526 thru # 23631 Dated 8 -27 -92 thru 9 -17 -92 Checks # 18436 thru # 18536 Dated 9 -28 -92 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks # 28400 thru # 28560 dated 9 -11 -92 Payroll Deduction check # 28565 thru 28582 dated 9 -11 -92 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. lz Attachments FINANCE/APPRCLM.AGN i iVOUCHREGCITYOFMAPLEWOODPAGE1 09/18 11 :31 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 1. IVOUCHER! CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 1,1 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 23526 0 08/26/9Z ANIMAL CONTRO SERVICES INC*ANIMAL CONTROL Z,,;:;14 » C,7 Z 23527 120325 08/25/9Z CELLULAR ONE _ _. _ _ ...TELEPHONE 42.02 4Z.0Z w:.S:S 410950 08/26/92 t;:EYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER TRAVEL TRAINING K=1:5.00 1 5 »00 ' ' Z35Z9 0 *30820 08/ Z6/9Z ANOKA- RAMSEY 'COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRAVEL TRAINING 295.00 295. l 235•.0 66 150 08 /26/92 NORTHEAS SOCCER ASSOCIATION SOCCER CLINIC INSTRUCTORS D1 . 00 601 . 00 , 23531 541400 08/26/92 M I N N . STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LI C FEES PAYABLE 727.00 727.00 2.235_5 2 541400 MINNv STATE TREASURER MOTOR VE.H L FEES PAYABLE 157447 »07 15,447.07 23535 140400 08 /27/9Z CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIVERS L I C FEES PAYABLE _1 ZS » 50 128.50 2355 661750 09/01/9:NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 82. 30 UTILITIES 99.84 UTILITIES NS UTILITIES 86 UTILITIES 5Z.Z; UTILIT 135 .52 UTILITIES 04.44 UTILITIES 116.44 f UTILITIES 142.13 903.52 _ 25554 541 400 09/01/9Z M I N N , STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L I C FEES PAYABLE 16 16,173.38 23555 541400 0:!/01 /92 MINN. STATE TREASURER a '' rSTATEDRIVERSLICFEES PAYABLE 998 .00 23556 061 1ZO 09 /01 /9Z --BARBER CONSTRUCTION _LAND IMPROVEMENT 30,583.86 C PAYABLE- RET.AINAGE 1, 5 »'0-29,054.6 23557 320500 .._09101 /92 ..-GROUP HEALTH _ I NC HCMA . DEDUCTION PAY 2 '- A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE 437.01 HEALTH LIFE DENTAL INSURANCE 11 ,659.81 15 ,087.24 Z3558 530100 09/01/9Z MEDI CA CHOICE HCMA DEDUCTION PAY 11969 . 00 PHP INS DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1 F-53 » 52 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE HEALTH LIFE DENTAL INSURANCE 15, O4u . 7S 17, 7O3 . _ 2 16 ; 2355 F51100 09 / 01/92 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE HCMA DEDUCT PAY 352.74 LIFE INSURANCE PAYABLE 384.74 A/R INSURANCE CONTINUANCE Z:.'- =4 HEALTH LIFE DENTAL INSURANCE 8 . ,,,1 235 180110 09/01 D.C. A»M ADMIN. FEE 2 o 27 2351.1 501400 09 /92 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE L.T.D. INSURANCE 186 1 - 33 '1686 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE9! 1 /92 1 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PER_ICD 09 VOUCHER/I CHECK VENDOR CHEC: 1<fiVENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECKNUMBERNUMBERDATENAMEDESCRIPTIONAMOUNTAMOUNT PUrL IC EMPLOYEE LIFE INSURANCE P'AYAI "LE X97.00 297.00 23563 66 0295 09/02/92 NCIRMANDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ADMISSIONS TO JAPANESE GARDEN 25.00 25.00 2 564 190010 09/02/9Z DECISION RES+_+URCES,LTD FEES - CONSULTING 3 5 .00 3, 2 .1 1 D . -_.N+ R fi E R fi STATES P 0 W E R U T I L I T I E f UTILITIES 114.29 1 UTILITIES 05.45 UTILITIES 78 UTILITIES 85.39 UTILITIES UTILI ES 15:3.1 UTILITIES 170,5,Y.: UTILITIES 172.26 1,:317 0 23566 88Z900 09/02 TWO GUYS FROM ITALY LUNCH ADULT TR I P 24Z.00 242.00 41400 .____M I i iV . STATE TREASURER 88TATE _DRIVERS L I C FEES P'AYADLE isT7D . - D T7c D 23568 541.400 0Q /02 /92 MINN. STATE TREASURER M VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE _.17 D-0 25 17, DSD . 5 23569 290 380 09 /Dc` /9Z FR I D , DOUGLAS JAMES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS CURRENT 592.60 592.60 131 i3} 235 ?D 140400--T r.._L . R Off_ . DISTR IC:T COURT CNTY DRI'VER L IG 5 RAYARLL- - _ Ii 23571 541400.09/MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 15,4:32.50 15,432.50 1; 40 3572 541400 09/03/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 546„50 546 4'; 4r, 2 5D145. - -_.PHILy DEPOSITS PAYADL 000 *00 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 66,03 1 066 v 03 23 5 T 4 7 2 11 S 0 -* f3 `P L A T Z ti _. _ to :, _ _ -E R, R_ L E R T D E F , I T S F A Y A I. L E 1 W.._._w. _..._... -.... 1 1.%, 511 235 460542 09/03 LEAGUE OF MN HUMAN RIGHTS COMM TRAVEL TRAINING i.D q . 0 0 Y'l Z 35T6 061 100 09/03/92 DANN I GAN KELLY P . A .LEGAL SERVICE 10 , •40 M 5 LEGAL & FISCAL 42.50 LEGAL & FISCAL 5.95. LEGAL & FISCAL 57.50 LEGAL & FISCAL 42.50 LEGAL'.& 'FISCAL r LEGAL & FISCAL 582.50 RA LEGAL & FISCAL 3 Pt 6. L F G A L 'FISCAL 2 LEGAL FISCAL 4Z.50 12,574.28 71 x.3577 1055 Ci; /C`}4L''CELLULAR ONE TELEPHNE _ _ _ -_ __ . _ _. ___..___D - -- X 7 X733 235 54087,5 09/04/92 MINN. DEPT.OF PUBLIC SAFETY TRAVEL TRAINING 20.00 7(, VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEW iOD PAGE 3 09/18/92 11:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERI 09 IJjVOUCHER/ CHECK°,VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM C HECF•::j NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT TRAVEL & TRAINING'40.00 60.00 k, 23579 021240 09104/92 AMERICAN INSTITUTE TRAVEL TRAINING 595.00 895 23580 661750 09/04/92 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 41507.07 I I:, a UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES _3.14 UTILITIES 4,47 UTILITIES 3.1.E UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES 4.47 UTILITIES 3.14 UTILITIES _ -9.4 UTILITIES x.14 4 .28 i 2 581 - -19 - 0 . 400 ____0'9 /04 /9_Z__CiF NATURAL RESTCURSES _...DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 31_. 0'0 -33 .00 _..._..._ F 'r3. 82 4140 09/04/STATEMINNSTATE TREASURER STATE r' STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 922-50 922 .50 I 23553 541400 09/04/99 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOT VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 14,759.3$14 , 759.SS 14 23584_'_--l1 1 `50 - - -0 / , - - -C. W HOULE -- INC.AWARDED CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS w7 .51 CONTRACTS PAYABLE- RETAINAGE 11,373.62-216, 098.89 I 23555 630762 °105/NATIONAL LEAGE OF CITIES TRAVEL TRAINING _ ._455M _ 00 __ -.,__- _.__.l.,+ TRAVEL & TRAINING 380.00 535.00 I 00 0 I0 /MINK. STA'TE'-'-TREASURER _ _ .STATE LIC FEES ' PAYABLE _s _ 50 .. -._ ._.__- ...._.310 I 23587 541400 r 1 0 /c:1 1 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 19,474 19,474.90 23588 54500 09/08/9ZZ STATE FARM INSURANCE A/R - AMBULANCE BILLS 230.00 230 . 00 s 1 23589 -.S E:1 - 1 ___- .._..__.:_0- . / = -- ___._TWIN CITY AREA LABOR TRAVEL TRAINING s; fr F 5 0 l0600 09 /09 / 92 r rMNSTREETSUPT. ASSOCIATION TRAVEL TRAINING 100.00 100.00 23591 510100 09 /09/92 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIAL, ASSN.SPORTS OFFICIALS 7 7 23592 042010__'___-09'/09/ASIAN -- UANG _INVESTIGATION ASSN.TRAVEL TRAINING __._.. __ _. -_ -- _ _50 __........__..__-50 ' 00 ____:.._.- 23593 5 F .09/HOLIDAY I N IV EAST TRAVEL TRAINING 1 :' . c 0 1 5.0 0 23594 531650 09 METR WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN SEWAGE TREATMENT 161,811,00 161,811 2355 54144 0 1 _C,_ .. _ . _MlNNw_STATE TREASURER 'STAX SURCHARGE TAX PBL_.r _ _ _ _ _....Z1164. 95 S.A.C. RETAINER 43. 32 -1 1 • •i 23596 541400 09/09/99 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC.973 »00 973.00 35'541400 09/09/92 /MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC.26, 544 2.6 44.74 0 T 1 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 409/18/92 11 :31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR VOUCHER/ C HEC1<VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM GHECkNUMBERNUMBERDATENAMEDESCRIPTIONAMOUNTAMOUNT I4c.4ta3 IO /.• .CI.EK: CAF DISTf ICT CUUhT DIRTY_ _nFI L.I.C..___. _.____.i ..,132 23600 660801 09 /10/92 NORTH ST. PAUL PRAYER BREADFAS TRAVEL TRAINING 7.00 7.00 3601 831600 09/10/92 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES OFFICE 88.11 Kr 1 . 13 NURTHERW ROGER _. _.UTILITIE UTILITIES 16.89,8 UTILITIES 7.0 UTILITIES 10.76 i UTILITIESLIES 55.96 UTILITIES 9 iUTIL6 _- ._ - - - -__ - -._____,__-.--i UTILITIES 7.0"zf; i UTILITIES 33:3.87 485.85 r -2 -603 541400 09 /10 /92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC.48Ca.00 430 30 r_•i 00 I .. ...i NN - . S_TATE TREASURER 0 - T`UR VE-H t4 ! 8'4 . •?24 54 r 6•1;?.333 f f236053605 661750 r+.09/ 1 /9c NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES OUL 135 1. UTILITIE 723.21 71 UTILITIES 52.81 38 UTILITIES 3 I' 14, . 71 r UTILITIES i UTILITIES x,81 UTILITIES 16 4E,l UTILITIES 1': . 2 1 , 16 .01 48 2:3606 451880 09/11/92 LARRY QU I GLEY C ONST DEPOSITS PAYABLE 1 II INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 25.48 i 02 48 12:3607 190400 09/11/9 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LICENSE FEES PAYABLE 7.00 5T.00 i '' ! f /3.•S TREASURER 23609 541400 I9 M I N N . STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L I C FEES PAYABLE _ ............._.25r t3.0#3 2-51660.08 i0 23610 131 500 09/11 CITY COUNTY EMPLOYEE CREDIT UNION DEDUCT PAYABLE 2 .00 252.00 t 2.3611 722200_1 ... 1 ... 79 ..... _ . _PULL I -C _ EMPLOYEE PERA DEDUCT ION - PAYABLE _... - -- - -- . _._..._.... PERA CONTRIBUTIONS L . 19 - . -. -- -- - -.... 14,405.78 Z5, 524 r 9 31 665 f15 f„ t S. F 1 ,,2 14341 . 706 09'/1 4'192 HERITAGE IRANk'12.1.1:., FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYABLE Z2 70I FICA CONTRIBUTIONS 9,121-13 40, 404.07 2361 560100 09/14/92 MN STATE COMMISSIONER STATE INCOME TAB: PAYABLE 9 239.67 9 239 6. 1 0 r..._.....: ......r•.._. -..a' n..r. .^s ..:e'+n, m .- .- ..... r,....... ,r '- •ev.n..w . >•. ^^w .:nT;.« .wn m?+f:annMe Y. *n'nerrz:m^ rvK,. -e,. ... N+, r n» Lro^-...n^.+ M.^: ^+^<^!.., ^^.. m; ny„« .»nne.,rs:M,•..mv!snae! ... , Ii VOUCHREG CITY OF MARLEWOOD PAGE 5 j i t - 09 /18/92 11:31 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 II VOUCHER/ CHECE:VENDOR CHECE;VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK 1 NUMBER NUMBER DATE DAME DESCR I PT I ON AMOUNT AMOUNT 236 09 14 / ?E. L'. S .. _..._ _...UNI DUES PAYABLE Z5. 00 15Z 00 1OI 23615 130200 09 CHANHA DINNER THEATRE DEPOSIT FOR ADULT TRIP x'43 .80 Z43. 23616 91 0500 09/14/92 VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL 5ZI.86 5ZI .86 2361 41 44 _._..0 +/ ., .KEL TEMPORARY SERVICES TEMPORARY . _SECRETARIAL SERVICE Z99.00 299.00 23618 910500 09 /14 /9Z VASKO RUBBISH REMOVAL GARBAGE PICK UP Z31-11 Z31-11 23619 66175 09/14/92 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 1, 161 «46 UTILITIES 363.99 UTILITIES _244.09 UTILITIES ZO.99 UTILITIES 7.69 UTILIT - IES 55. 42 UTILITIES 10T.87 1 UTILITIES 4 9 r 5 1 f UTILITIES 40..96 ... UTILITI 126.2,377.99 I 2 362 a175Ci_ - _D i -/, --iViRTHERN STATES POWER --UTILITIES 179.64 1r UTILITIES 8.63 UTILITIES 236.17 UTILITIES 120. UTILITIES IT6 .94 UTILITIES 147.31 UTILITIES 13 UTILITIES Z8.61 UTILITIES 16.76 27.45 2362 I 661750 09/14/9Z NORTHERN STATES P UTILITIES 41.87 UTILITIES 115.07 UTILITIES _133.26 UTILITIES 3x:.00 322.0 23622 5 14.00......_.t 9 / 1 . ., .c.._.MI NN .__ TREASURER-STATE DRIVERS L I C FEES PAYAB _...71.1.E io 711.00'' , 23423 541400 09/ 14/922 MI NN . STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L IC FEES PAYABLE 16,089.09 16,089 23624 341706 09/14/92 HERITAGE LAND WAGE DEDUCTI 637.50 637.50 I 23;541 0 r 15/9x*.MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH L IC FEE PAYABLE 1 f , 453.54 1 1 , 453 «54 23626 541400 09/15/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVER LI C FEES PAYABLE 570.00 570 23627 430200 09/ 16/92 KNOTTS LEERY RESTR.O iPROGRAMGRAMLUNCHEtN 380 .70 3"0 » 70 I 23628 501575 09/16/9 MALL OF AMERICA ADULT TRI 1 188. 23629 541400 09/16/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER DRIVERS LICENSE 826. 50 526.10 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 4.76 SUPPLIES- JANITORIAL 12.70 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL .36 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 18.74 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 6.16 SUPPLIES JANITORIAL _ SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 3.8: MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 1 5.2 2 MAINTENANCE MATER F. 6, MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 142.98 I; MAINTENANCE MATERIAL. 53.76 94 ti 69MAINTENANCEMATERIA -L - - - -- - - -- c _ 18438 020400 09f28/9Z AIRSIGNAL, INC PAGER RENTAL 67I8V - PAGER SERVICE - _ _ _.. __ _ ._... .. _._ ___._. _ ._ _..__... ._ . 4 . _ Sol- _.._ .....____..___ .._.,___ .... .. v..... _ .__ ........ ..... . -.w.. _.._ .................. PAGER SERVICE 16 "04 PAGER MAINTENANCE /RENTAL 13.21 1 PAGER _.. _...._.... _ __ _ _ . ... __ . -____ __._,___ -_- _+ ..`_ _.__._. - 0 7r : _` I P43C) 02120Ci 0'= /:7.R 9:7 AMERICAN FASTENER SIGNS SIGNALS 72.31 l 4 18440 0:175 ' // AMTECH EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REPAIR MAINT /EQUIPMENT 81.50 81.50 18441 : cir_,0 ...7.. I . - AfI IMAL _C _SERVI.CEE_ .._ I..LC - - __.ATI.LMAt . ER ICE ... EE .• . «+ - __ _.__ -_ ' l 18442 031100 09 /28 /92 APPEARANCE PLUS REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 3. REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE . 7.0 0 REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 18 REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 6.00 84.00 18445 040915 09 /Z8 /9Z ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH . 285 «45 REPAIR MAINT VEH. 262.54 REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE - .._.._ ._.._....__......_.. __.. _._.....- .... *63T . 6 6 REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 355.25 1 1 1 0 09 /28/9_x BARBER CONSTRUCTION __ LAND-IMPROVEMENT''144 44 0 CONTRACTS PAYABLE -RETAINAGE 2 64,2.23 -- LAND IMPROVEMENT T, 402,41 509202x46 VOUCHREG CCITY OF MAPLEWOOD PPAGE 6 09/18/9z 111:31 VVOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ ICHECKVVENDORCCHE: _ : _VEifIOF,ITEi ITEM _CHECKC NUMBER NNUMBER DDATE NNAME DDESCRIPTION AAMOUNT AAMOUNT 236'.3 0 5541 009Icy / f Z MMI NN . .STATE TREASURER 23631 1140400 009/17/92 CCLERK: OF DISTRICT COURT CCNTY DRIVERS LIC. 1154.50 18436 0010464 009 AAT & T TTELEPHONE 1161 .t8 TELEPHONE 331 .80 1193.08 184•.x7 0 5 nnr 9 SACEHARDWARESUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT1 34.6 . SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 557.55 LL- - - - _y .. Y.. ....u_..._. ...Wy....w.- ...._.. _... SUP'P'LIES - JANITORIAL 117.83 SUPPLIES - JANIT 115. SUPPLI 4 18440 0:175 ' // AMTECH EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REPAIR MAINT /EQUIPMENT 81.50 81.50 18441 : cir_,0 ...7.. I . - AfI IMAL _C _SERVI.CEE_ .._ I..LC - - __.ATI.LMAt . ER ICE ... EE .• . «+ - __ _.__ -_ ' l 18442 031100 09 /28 /92 APPEARANCE PLUS REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 3. REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE . 7.0 0 REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 18 REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 6.00 84.00 18445 040915 09 /Z8 /9Z ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR MAINT VEH . 285 «45 REPAIR MAINT VEH. 262.54 REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE - .._.._ ._.._....__......_.. __.. _._.....- .... *63T . 6 6 REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 355.25 1 1 1 0 09 /28/9_x BARBER CONSTRUCTION __ LAND-IMPROVEMENT''144 44 0 CONTRACTS PAYABLE -RETAINAGE 2 64,2.23 -- LAND IMPROVEMENT T, 402,41 509202x46 GU :HREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD i 09/18/921S'/11:31 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER f'AC;E 7 FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCHER/ CHECK VEND0R CHEC;J VENDOR ITEM T TEM CHEC_K. _NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT f!j 15445 070100 ---------0* /28/9 BEACON PRODUCTS BEACON SPORTS PRODUCTS, I NC .66' 5.665. 00*.__._ -._. i 1.8446 071067 09/28/9Z DERRY BEARING COMPANY SUPPLIES VEHICLE 18447 071550 09/28/92 L'TC; BEN RESTAURANT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 908..76 908.76 44$tSQ:3 5 BLACKSTONE - . GAIL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 58,24 TRAVEL & TRAINING RD1 1844'OSu'tu DLL /' /_ARD OF - WATER COMMISSIONERS—-.__--UTI-CITIES - _._.._._ - _.__._..- __.--- __.- -_ -___ ___._.:_-_.._._..._.____...._----.--.._. IJ UTILITIES 5 ••4 1UTILITIES UTILITI r. R4dy UTILITIES 15RTZ 1UTILI'IE r 4r R 1 Ir+ UTILITIES -- _ . - - --12.91 725.96 j (1 18450 090568 09 /28/92 BRAUER ASSOC ETAT S L ES CONSULTING 763.23 763-23 18451 090573 09 /Z8r92 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING, INC FEES - CONSULTING 715,47 7 18.47 SQUARE MAINTENANCE 25 1 S45S 101 09/28/92 BUSINESS RECORDS CORP., MN BUSINESS RECORDS CORP RECORDS 13,630 USINE S CORP BUSINESS RECORDS CORD 34-24 13 4ai1545437 -2 -5 -/- --- __ _CEMST0NE COMPANY MAINTENANCE MATER -IAL t I 1 2 9 h r MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 104.90 1 1 1314 --0 / Z8 /g CI _LEAGUE SUPP - OFFICE 10.00 10.00 1 W 18456 140205 09/2 8/92 CLEAN STEP RUGS RUG CLEANING 8R l ZSRc5 I 18457 150035 09/28/92 COHANES, ANTHONY TRAVEL & TRAINING 1S. 10 1:3 • 1+a I l i 1S45S 1.515;5 _r ltcl.S.__. - - INC.CONCRETE . FC+RM ENGZIVEER,OUTSIDE RENTAL EQUIPMENTOUTSIDE 8/9 C+3PY EQU_I F'MENT , I NC .SUPPLIES -- EQUIPMENT 47.45 SUPPLIE - OFFICE _sF• rr 18460 180110 09/28/92 D.C.A.M ISC r CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 402 18461 181800 09/Z8/92 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT SMALL TOOLS 7Z. ?S r73 18462 1 1557 Df /Z:3/9'Z DAVIS LOCK SAFE SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT t. 64 G. 1846 190060 09/28/92 DEGE GARDEN CENTER PROGRAM SUPPLIES ul 10,r.;•'10.63 18464 190130 09/28/` 2 DESC+3 JAMES T.PROGRAM REGISTRATION 85.00 85.00 ff:{ I CITY OF MAPLEW F'AGE VOUCHER /CHECK:REGISTER FOR PERIOD 0 iR CHECK VENDOR ITEM , .. 1-.1-..1-.... _.. _ _ ITEM CHECK i cR DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AM OUNT I` ! I r C: 65 lt 3rd.Cif ,•r8 /r ;..DO , TAMARA PROGRAM - REGISTRATION FEES 100 r0D it 0.O0 1) 18466 290450 09/28/9 FROYS , DAN PROGRAM REGISTRATION 95. 00 95 i 311 184+ 7 300500 09 /. r .. • 8 /92 G K SERVICES UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 132.35 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 23.:31 U N I 2i R M , C L i T H I G 8 " „ h 4 . _ _ . ____.. _ -- -------------1 1 i UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 3T6.43 614.73 F 11.22 I 184.,8:C-i0o6.00 2 '- 92 G.A. L- . 8U SINESS SE JUDGEMENTS & LOSSES 331.27 18469 301060 09/ 28 /92 GALLIUHER, PATRICIA PR REGISTRATION FEES 25.25.00 21-11 18470 302100 09 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY SUPPLIES VEHICLE 52.06 Z -06 1_t t t3`0'x:9'00 05)/'8/ '2 I il WGLEW_D INGLEW W" 'A COOLER /EQUIP. RENTAL 4 _8", 48 _ . _ 65 ....___.._._,__ 18472 3 09/28 GOPHER BEARING CO.VEHICLE SUPPLIES 119.88 119.88 11 18473 341 325 09 HENNEN, EUGENE PROGRAM REG 18TRATION 85.00 8!50 .00 1341331 1 8 5 {.i'77 0 8/ 5i 2 H06 AN, NANC Y PROGRAM REGISTRATION 25 .00 25 .00 w. 31 38; 15475 400600 09 J.L. SHIELY CO.MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 970.53 970.53 103' 4 7 6 400950 09 /28/92 JEAN THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMPORARY CLERICAL SERVICE 172.172.II"; 18411 401800 09 /Z.8'.JOLLY' S, INC.PROGRAM SUPPLIES 18478 410420 09 /28/92 KELLER ELECTRIC INC.KELLE ELECTRIC CO.1 1 , 790.00 111 48 18479 410425 09/28/92 FELLER FENCE CO. -REMOVE AND RELOCATE FENCING T54.00 T54.00 50 18'480 410441 f l c I z KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES SECRETARIAL SERV EIC C . .........Y 3. 54 18481 450+ 07 09/28/9Z LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER I CUO TRAVEL . AV TRAINING 25 Q,QQ P.11 r 3t Mif 5( 18482 460610 09/28 LEHNE' S SERVICE INC SCRAP TIRES LOADED 364.364.25 i51i I 18483 480450 09 /28/92 LOCKRIDGE, JAMES S.A.C. PAYABLE 700 . 00 7 18484 480675' _'__'__09_/28" /9Z LORD FLETCHERS RESTAURANT ADULT LUN - CNEON TRIP 12:485 500775 09 /28/92 M.T.E. INC •PURCHASE OF COMPUTER HARD DRIVE 9, 5sL. t 1 L L . • 1.. 18486 501505 09/28/92 MALL ICH a GRETC:HEN B.PROGRAM SUPPLIES 10 .64 TRAVEL & TRAINING 7.50 72 VEHICLE ALLOWANCE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 14.8 9 92.39 V51 18490 540320 99.99._. _ O' /dt'. _ MTDWEaT FENCE 1Fi MIDWEST FENCE 8ZI •Z4 8, 8Z1 w r 18491 541910 09/28/9Z MINNESOTA CLE TRAVEL TRAINING 15.O.y TRAVEL . T R A I hl I N G 1;:- 5 r C. t TRAVEL TRAINING 185.00 r TRAVEL TRAINING 185 .00 740 .00;j 184' 570050 09/ 8/99 MODI LE EMERGENCY SYSTEMS, I NC . REPAIR MAINT RADIO 181 . 0i 181 .0 "i i r 18 493 . ?3D.I 1YIOTJRiaLA .._._.I.NC_ REPAIR : MAThITlR1DIi , ' ?r.,. REPAIR MAINT RADIO 94.56 1 9999. _999.9. .. ,: i18494 +l:Ol9Z 9 999 MIUhIGUN CARL PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES' - -- _. - ._. . 04 t . D I:3 r a T + COMPUTERS - OFFICE 1.:.G w -,J18495430X18009 /Z8/ !V 9-`--999 __. _..____ _....,..._. 9999_._. .......... 9999 ._- _.__ ..__ _ _____..,.__....... OFFICEEUxF'MENT = - 51T r 1 r. ._ r ., ur ,- TRAVEL TRAINING 30.25 ..0.25 184 6 640500 fir /28 /9 2 NELSON, CAROL M. 1849T 640550 09 /Z8 /9Z NE JEAN VEHICLE ALLOWANCE ZI .66 Z1.66 T _.._._ l., -. - .._ -_._ __....... .._..._.._._.... ..._.._.._.._._...,_.,._ w .. ............__.._..__ 9.999..____ .__.......,_..._........._ ___999.9. -... 9999. -9.999 _... I ' 184'x'8 101 F5 O9I:8s /9 NORTH STAR TURF, INC. MAINTENANCE 'MATERIAL'-- .._ 99 99 , 57 4 MAINTENANCE . MATERIAL 119.28 3 18499 6 1 18c .. __ .. _ - - O9 / 8/' NORTHERN AIRGAS INC SUPPLIES _.....__....__......__. _ 9999.. 38,40 38.40 18500 Erb1750 09 /Z8 /9Z NORTHERN STATES P CHARGES FOR DAMAGE DONE 453.09 453. 18501 680600 09 /28/ 92 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 142. REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE ZZ.50 ! - -! REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 7 a -50 REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 2Z.50 REPAIR MAINT VEHICLE 30 Z.f._. --- 9999___ 1' -,502 690205 09 /Z8 /9Z OLD LOG THEATRE THEATER TICKETS ADULT TRIP 4Z3.00 423w00 1850] GJ1 5 09 /28/9Z OSTREM, LOIN PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 25 .00 Z5 / OCR . 601 18504 711504 09 /ZO /9Z PHOTOS TO GO PHOTO DEVELOP I NG 19 .9 PHirTO . DEVELOPING- ANIDIAL CONTkL_ _. __ 5,21 DEVELOP FILM 14.48 4,. PHOTO DEVELOPING 52.50 PHOTO DEVELOPING 4.03 PHOTO DEVELOPING 4.10 100. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PPAGE r' rr VUCHREG C 09/18/ _11:31 _ FFOR PERIOD 09 C VOUCHER / _ VENDOR -CHECK: V 9999.__. _kkr M1 NUMBER NNUMBER DDATE NNAME DDESCRIPTION rr 184x 511600 u l c /9;Z M r ii .i 2 1 18488 55 050c 00' l 8!' MMCGU IRE, MICHAEL VVEHICLE ALLOWANCE 4400.00 _ _ ..__ _400 __.__ _.__.._ _fl., 18489 55301500 009 / 28 /92 MMENARDS MMAINTENANCE MATERIAL VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 10 09/18/92 11:31 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD D i 1 VOUCHER/ i •, CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK - - NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT ' I"I 18'S S 7 13 5 0 / 8/'PR0MC1TICtN SPECIALTIES P - " - F - , _181.00 181.00 18506 T41200 09/28/92 RAINBOW FOODS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 16 . 202D PROGRAM SUPP PROGRAM SUPPLIES 19.01 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 53.21 92.34 1851 0T T42120 09/28/92 RAMSEY COUNTY PAINT STRTS gXWALKS j ARROWS, ETC .5, 702 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 172.04 OUTSIDE ENGINEER 'EEG 346.76 6 18508 742515 09/28/92 RANGER INDUSTRIAL CORP .MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 160.58 f1.Ci.S, {.,) 18509 761200 09/28/92 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR & MAINT /EQUIPMENT 941.18 SUP'P'LIES - VEHICLE 960.35 18510 7TO302 09/28/' 2 RUMPLA, LEE PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEES 25.00 25.00 'I. 'i 1,.3.5 11 77 O c00 IG T -RYC r SUPPLY CO SUPPLI - `ES 34 18512 T80175 09/28/92 S &S SALES CORPORATION VEHICLES 444.74 444.7`4 37 18513 780350 09 /28/92 S.E.H.OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 766 .01 1 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 3 2 40 UTSIDE ENGINEERING_ FEES_1585.4 18514 T804Q 092 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES OFFICE 34w 30 34.30 n 18515 831050 09 /28/SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATION PUBLISHING 324.36 324 18 s 6 00 18517 840275 09/28/92 ST .JOHN ' S HOSPITAL COPIES OF REPORT 3 3.7`5 k 18518 840300 09/28/92 ST .PAUL BOOK STATION UNIFORMS CLOTHING i 3 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 64.65 86.16 18519 840400 09/28/92 ST.PAUL CITY OF PHOTO FINISHING 41.27 41. I5" 5`) 18520 841SiO 09/281J92 ST. '' PAUL WATEK UTILITY MAINTENANC MATERIAL __ .....:...... ..........._..-195 ._ 7 ....- _.......1 I67 18521 843300 09/Z8/92 STEIC:HENS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 304.42 304 .42 E;,; E,4 18522 843575 09/28 STREICHERS GUNS SUPPLIES VEHICLE 174.43 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 82.37 256.80 18523 850315 09 /28/ 92 SUBURBAN PRINTING r_ r_ r_• '=D U ,.I N E , S C A R D,28 . 00 7028.00 71 18524 850350 09/28/92 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY SUBSCRIPTIONS '11 MEMBERSHIPS __. _1_.i . _..__ -i { -- _ -- - -171 185 '}E 5 851575 f+ - r09 /28/92 SYSTEMSr rSYSTEM, SUPPLY, INC.r ,SUPPLIE EQUIPMENT 141.14'f.. UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1ST «96 649.11 4( 47 41 155 31 910 0 -0- - _.--- _0. -9 / - 8792 VAS[ _'RUBBISH_ REMOVAL RUPTISH_.REMO{iAL -.. ---- _.._.._ - - -- - - - - -- - - -- : i ,_._ -.. iT , 1 C'532 911350 09/28/92 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 195.21 195 .21 18533 911600 09/28/92 VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 100.59 r, c UNIFORMS CLOTHING 111.61 212.20 t,f 135:34 912100 09/28/92 VIRTUE PRINTING SUPPLIES -- OFFICE 170.45 170 f8535 9510120 09/Z8/92 WOOD, WILLIAM S.A.C. PAYABLE 700 .00. - _ TOO. 18536 950325 09/28/92 WORD PERFECT MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS ;x MEMBERSHIPS 24 «00 24.00 64 16" 6f TOTAL CHECKS 961,411638 f 757C VOUCHREG CCITY OF MAP'LEWOOD PPAGE 11 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD}t VOUCHER/ CHECK; VVENDOR CCHECK: VVENDOR IIT IITEM CCHECK NUMBER NNUMBER DDATE NNAME DDESCRIPTION AAMOUNT AAMOUNT 6 7 9 UPP L IE S. . - E 0 UlP MEN T tr155268860080009 /28/92 TT.A. ,.,CWIFSKY SONS INC MMAINTENANCE MATERIAL 22 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL _...- ....__.... - _ -._. _i I «..;D.___.. _3 -- 34,_f1-3-- ...__ 1852T 3360650 009/28/92 TTARGET STORES—CPC, A/R SSUPPLIES JANITORIAL 332 . ^4 MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES -7 1-2 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 119.98 ,f MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES 332 «3S PROGRAM SUPP II3 :3.06 SUPPL OFFICE 441.43 22: SUPPLIES OFFICE 229 .51 RPR0GA SPPL I E9 - -182 SUPPLIES. EQUIPMENT 77.45 2f SUPPLIES OFFICE 33.73 ; SUPPLIES OFFICE PROGRAM SUP'P'LIES 25 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 11 3 3' IGR P 221 .5 33: PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2201.68- 2292040 3f 3 , 1C.5.1 SS 07'51_ 00 - — 2 , 8 92 TTRY CHEMICAL INDU,TkIE SS P* LIES, — JANITCRIAL 11 - 112 .00 3; 3f IS529 8890600 009/2S UU.H.L. INC. SSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 1145,05 1 3 118530 9900100 009/28/92 UUNIFORMS UNLIMITED UUNIFORMS & CLOTHING 22i5.713 !t; UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 1151.0 'aU UhIIFiiRfiYIS & CLOTHING- -9 . 3 W .. _........ _.. ._......_.. _..... 757C CITY OF MAP LEWOOD 00rEd I EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS A "1 0028404 09/11/92 FRANCES L JUKER 4 0028405 MICHAEL A McGUIREi CARLSON-or 17 267,63 3, I 071 Jr 20-_.____---_ FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 2 CHECK---NUMBE_1:v.-__CHECK- DATED.-- -.PgvfEE---AMOU14 0 0 121 840 G-I NA--- CASA RE 805's 0028410 09/11/92 DAVID J ,KAHN 097, 88 0028401 09/11/92 DALE CARLSON 267. 63 002840 29 09/11/92 GEGRGE ROSSBACH 267.63 28413 0 =2 )3Ji 09/11/92 ANDREA J OSTER 3044 A "1 0028404 09/11/92 FRANCES L JUKER 4 0028405 MICHAEL A McGUIREi CARLSON-or 17 267,63 3, I 071 Jr 20-_.____---_ JL: 28414 09/11/92 WILLIAM MIKISKA 185,630 . 0 A-r5 o." 1351 0028416 09/11/92 LINDA ZICK 912, 50 0028417 09/11/92 DEBORAH DEHN -706, 72 RICHARD---H-ANC3SLEBEN-- 1 405s' 3cy----jo; 2 84 4 l! 0(-_)28419 09/11/92 ALANA K MATHEYS2 4 3'. 0028420 09/11/92 DELORES A VIGNALD C a-r- ---- - - 1 251 a 70 1, 2 16-0- OCY---'--- 481 1 /lid UHIL BLACKSTONE 2 0028408 09/11/92 GRETCHEN MAGLICH 1, Vii: 39 0 0 121 840 G-I NA--- CASA RE 805's 0028410 09/11/92 DAVID J ,KAHN 097, 88 0 02 84 11 09/11/92 LYLE SWANSON 1 101, 14 3,297jr 28413C 09/11/92 ANDREA J OSTER 11 16-610 10 JL: 28414 09/11/92 WILLIAM MIKISKA 185,630 . 0 A-r5 o." 1351 0028416 09/11/92 LINDA ZICK 912, 50 0028417 09/11/92 DEBORAH DEHN -706, 72 RICHARD---H-ANC3SLEBEN-- 1 405s' 3cy----jo; 2 84 4 l! 0(-_)28419 09/11/92 ALANA K MATHEYS2 4 3'. 0028420 09/11/92 DELORES A VIGNALD C a-r- ---- - - 1 251 a 70 1, 2 16-0- OCY---'--- 481 BHUUE ANDERSON 1 , 040, 50 0028423 09/11/92 LUCILLE E AURELIUS iE! o6q, 06 0 "842' 0028425 09/11/92 PATRICIA FRY 664,46 0028426 09/11/92 LOIS BEHM 1 I CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0002 EMPLOYEE GROSS.EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD uc 0028428 09/11/92 LORRAINE S VIETOR e ,.v ' 09'11'92 PATRI.CIu A HENSLEr 1,121.30 660.78 40 li 0028430------------0911/AE ]E --------------- -1,05969-- 0028446 09/11/92 JOHN J BANICK 0028431 09/11/92 JEANETTE E CARLE 1 BOHL r` - 0028432 09/11/92 SANDRA OLSON g40"81 84 Is KAY'-PALANK- --' ' - '954.66 -- 1r 0028449 09/11/92 RICHARD M MOESCHTER 09/11/92 0328434 09/11/92 KENNETH V COLLINS 2, 359. 94 0028435_09/11/92 CAROLE L RICHIE 1,199.24 1,521.49 0028437 09/11/92 ELAINE FULLER 576.17 0028438 09/11/92 CAROL F MARTINSON 1 40 0028440 09/11/92 ROBER T D NELSON 2, 034m 46 0028441 09/11/92 VERNON T STILL 1, 1'92 C"`. ^- S`=,,=~o/.,6 A 1o80210 ---- --- - 40 li 0028446 09/11/92 JOHN J BANICK 0028447 09/11/92 JOHN C BOHL 0028449 09/11/92 RICHARD M MOESCHTER 09/11/92 JOHN H ATCHISON 1. 1,741.16 1v546--m- 87---- 1,546.87 1,546.87 a45 ------'-- -- 1 84646 s 002845 3 09/11/92 nEv^m nAoBE ` , 17081,24 CITY CE MA 0003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CU R REH »' PAY PERIOD fli U t iEC1 A TAI PAYEE i ._.0w ST 1wf •i ! iYr y ;(( ;ya.• ( y » { , / . r»(,+(tTJM • ' t ._.. ice. CZE7 • !7 _ .-_...._. ..__._'"._..__,_._._.— ....._... _..... ._....,.._... _.. . -.... .. .._.t +t. _ _. . +1jy _.__. _-.._..._...._.- LK it s irwj » • 0028455 09/11/92 V I RG I H I A DOWDLE 1 065 * 91 0028456 09/11 /92 CABOT V WELCHLIN 1 , 1 5 88. 4 1 0028458 09/11/92 DALE A Z # A Z OFF 1 548. 87 0028459 09/11/92 MICHAEL RYAN 1 y . 1 756'19- 1a'C3i 28461 09/11/92 R I C. fARD C DREGER 1 00284.62 09/G REGORY ... STAFNE 1 n')1 }_j am .f ____RMl LD -•-_ D _ ..DECKE ._-- ___._____.._____.___ n , 40 '028464 09/11/92 KEVIN R HAL LEG 21 25 25 0028465 DER BELL T STOCK TON 1 546. 87 2i ' . I 2a; yt i1 fw }w r 09 /11/92 RICK A BOWMA 1 3' 0028488 09/11/92 FLINT D . K AR I G 1 , ; 569m 21 1 569-m- . E-1------J 41 0 r i»» v _- ___:.' v' 0028470 09 JOHN FRASER 1 E09* 28 3 8 ` 1 09/11/92 .DAVID # G #1 - 7 x 7 4 J ...'. i t « L.. I L. `___-M + , - 3 -! "L __tom - ••- }-s .} -• .}'.}{- }__ _. - -- -- - ._ - -- - - - - -- ___. - - - -.r ._.._ f : . Wit_.- _ -_. -- Jzri 284 73 09/11/92 STEVEN PALMA 11, , 74 m 10 0028474 09 yv 0028476 09/11/92 JAMES MEEHAN 1 670w 10 y 9 / 1.1 / 92 JON A MEL.AHDE R 11617,74 0 C) f AEB M EBETGOH 1 0028480-09/11/92 D ANE. ,J WILLIAMS 1, 499, 22 J7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD MEER 4` 0028500 09/11/92 ERICK D OSWALD v 5v1 _ 09/11./92 ' ` RONALD L rm'c,Eou, 002850 _wTLL An- ------------- 1 0028503 09/11/92 FANDALLINDBLOM 1,352.97 ME------------_--------~ 0028505 0 a `0028482 09/11/92 JULIE A STAHNKE 1,389.83 DENNIS L PECK 0028507 SCOTT K BOYER 1,838.47^ - 1, 8022()284 4 o|0028485 09/11/92 JOSEPH FEHR 1 0,028486 09/11/92 SHAWN THOLEN 663. 60 ` 1,2~— T 0028488 09/11/92 JUDITH WEGWERTH 765.70 0028489..09/11/92 KENNETH G HAIDER 2 1 232 5() 0Vl V/l l/WILLIAM PRIEFER 1 0028492 09/11/92 GERALD W MEYER 1 270, 67 0028494 09/11/92 BRYAN NAGEL l 228 68 0284.5 09111/92 DAVID '- LU / Z 1 v v//1,199.70 ' 4` 0028500 09/11/92 ERICK D OSWALD v 5v1 _ 09/11./92 ' ` RONALD L rm'c,Eou, 002850 _wTLL An- ------------- 1 0028503 09/11/92 FANDALLINDBLOM 1,352.97 1,482.10 1 El 0028505 0 0028506 09/11/92 DENNIS L PECK 0028507 09,11'92 WILLIAM ' pnIEBE 1,482.10 1 El CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0005 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 40 0028509 09/11/92 WALTER M GEISSLER 1 495. 74 0 '09/11/g2 RES'METZ 1, 260. 0N ---------- 1 0488' 5) i 0 09/11/92 ROBERT D ODEGARD 2,124.27 0028513 09/11/92 LOIS J BRENNER 1,210.90 4W BARBARA-'A-K ------ ' ` --'--571~{5--- 410,J 0028515 09/ 1 1/92 PAULINE STAPLES 1, 866. 10 0028516 09/11/92 LUTHER JONES 83, 20 rtqL 0028518 09/11/92 ROBERT S ANDERSON 1 002851,91.09/1.1/92 DENNIS P LINDORFF 1 40 0028521 09/11/92 ROLAND B HELEY 1 245, 30 09/11/92 MARK CARLE 396w75 1 -731a 0028524 09/11/92 JAMES SCHINDELDECKER 1 165w3o 0028525 09/11/92 DAVID WIEDL 122*85 002S52614 0028528 09/11/92 LEE STOERZINGER 92m 00 0028530 09/11/92 RICHARD E STARK 46,00 0028531 09/11/92 CRAIG 01ISKELL 002'8533 SANDRA LEARNED 27,r5O OQ28534-09/11/92 ROY G WARD 419w02 0028543 09/11/92 MARIE BARTA vvo BEurFxE, w uLSum- ------ ---- 0028545 09/11/92 NANCY MISKELL 0028546 097/11/92 o vv«»54' 1,110.5@ 491.43 648w 30 2920( --- 0028554 09/11/92 KENNETH ROBERTS 1 0028549' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0006 00 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS N4RIT-GRI-E- DST ROOT--1 742 FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD DENNIS n MuLunnEY 36: C)(--)28551 09/11/92 NICHOLAS N CARVER 1 r,c'C A,EL AMOUNT s i^DOUGA ----------~—'-1,531.70_-- o/0028536 09/11/92 JANET M GREW HAYMAN 537.05 0028537 09/ 11/92 JEAN NELSON 559, 99 0o28539 09/11/92 ANN E HUTCMIMSUN 1, 310. 90 0028540 09 39.88 a|0028542 09/11/92 KATHLEEN M DOHERTY 0028543 09/11/92 MARIE BARTA vvo BEurFxE, w uLSum- ------ ---- 0028545 09/11/92 NANCY MISKELL 0028546 097/11/92 o vv«»54' 1,110.5@ 491.43 648w 30 2920( --- 0028554 09/11/92 KENNETH ROBERTS 1 0028549'09/11/92 THOMAS G EKSTRAND 00 0028557 N4RIT-GRI-E- DST ROOT--1 742 DENNIS n MuLunnEY 36: C)(--)28551 09/11/92 NICHOLAS N CARVER 1 1,712.50 1,288.47 54 --- 1,242.90 1,362.90 oodboo8:j 1 248.-5C)- 0028554 0028557 09/11/92 DAVID GERMAIN DENNIS n MuLunnEY 1,712.50 1,288.47 54 --- 1,242.90 1,362.90 oodboo8:j 1 248.-5C)- 3, <:: V CITY OF MAPL.EWOOD 0007 1 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD i 3 51 ttj ''}% f jt7jj T T ASSOC 7Mwr. T.r iw:LFiwwR iii.iF:___i i -- __. -_.... _.__......_- .- .__.._._.._._.._ .__.- ..._. .__._..__._....._ 09 /11/92 LL Ei L.i i 6675 , 003 Mr4 - - . TRTE - -- O — _-- DF-- _.REVE UE._- _- _---- _-- __w.____ U 0 I D 097 ; r3 ------- 0028563 V0I D 09/11/92 FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA)9 121 i 13 s - -- t - - - - -- ---- _____.._.--- .— .._._ - - - - -- - - -__ mmo - - -- 28564 VOID 92 PUBLIO E P RETIREMENT ASSOC 4 AMSEY CO SUPPORT & COLLECT 44f -)0., 0 I ` 14 3 rv,S 0 2 8 1-j LJ J CY9 J ..r frw J ! f 1 i r 1 7 i LJ «" J 5 « i . + • S Y V .d L.. E Le S. 2 y 2 .0028566 U 0 I D 09 / 11/ 92 F I S T MINNESOTA j) ,tw 1 .L. i 7..f i l - J 4 00 856.7 TO I D 09/1 CITY OF MAPLE WOOD (HCMA)31197,86 c 7i 148 00028584 VV 0 I D 009/11/92 EE I RST MINNESOTA (FICA) 9 1 49 U008L58, r U0 I 7ra11/92, PPUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 5 78. # =E 0028569 V 0 I D 09/11/92 UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL.... AREA 111, 00 ly: V 0 I [11/92 COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE 19 0 E#0 1 ru r —M# ' AT RE T l RE ME ITT ` S T E hfi.___.__.._ ..__..._._.... __ _._.. _. _.._.8 8 ... OC - _ .r— .. 3; 2 +'002857 V 0 I D 09/11/ 2 P UBL. PUBIC EMPi RET I REMENT ASSOC,14 5O 002857 09:AFSCME 2725 620,84 G.. 1 X30 i 00285 l J 09 /11/92 MN MUTU LIFE I N8 i 19 2 00 3, <:: VVOID r J { s 3 t34f I BLirw! ff i 1J. J < 3 51 ttj ''}% f jt7 jj T T ASSOC J l 3028 5 009 /11/92 LL Ei L.i i 6675 , 003 1d0! t 1 s - -- t - - - - -- ---- _____.._.--- .— .._._ - - - - -- - - -__ m mo - - -- a 42! r «- 28581 °009/11 A AMSEY CO SUPPORT & COLLECT 44f -)0., 0 I ` 14 3 0028 8 009/11 L L.. E Le S. 22 c 7i 148 0 0028584 VV 0 I D 0 09/11/92 EE I RST MINNESOTA (FICA) 99 49 U008L58, r U0 I 7ra11/92, P PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 5 78. # =E 152; 2285 UU O I D 09i i i1 E#0 10 AGE14DA NO. ;z Action by Council.'lAGENDAREPORT Endorsed, Too Cit Mana Modified Re ected... FROK-0 Finance Director f Date RE: PINANCIAL T'RAN'SFERS TO CLOSE REJECTED MPROVEHERr PROJECTS 0DATHO September 21,,, 1992 INTRODUCTION it is proposed that transfers totalin $173, 896.25 be made from the General Fund to eliminate the defic.1 is and close several funds for improvement pro that have been rejected b the Cit Council. BACKGROUND 0 When: an en feasibilit stud is ordered for a public improvement project, a fund is created to account for the cost of the stud When stud costs are Incurred., a cash deficit is created in the project fund, The pro fund is char interest on the cash deficit e to the interest rate earned on Cit investments. If the project is approved, the cost of the en feasibilit stud and interest expense is included in the total project costs and financed b special assessments or other fundin sources. If a project is re the cost of the en feasibilit stud and interest expense is financed b the General Fund. This is done b a transfer of" mone from the General Fund to the project fund at the time the project fund is closed. The General Fund can be reimbursed if the project is reconsidered at a later date. Transfers from the General Fund to eliminate cash deficits and close several funds for improvement projects rejected b the Cit council are needed for the followin amounts. 90,767*37 Project 85-08., Ed Storm Sewer 51 Project 88-09, Care Hei Drive 17 Project 90-12, Harvestor Storm Sewer 11 Pro' #Project 9D-13, Duluth- En Storm Sewer 3,173.81 Project 92-w13, Hazelwood, Count Road C - Beam It is recommended that the Council approve transfers and bud ad for the amounts listed above All of these transfers were included in the financial projections for the 1993 Bud CLOSE.U.P. AGE F -3 Action by COLII1ClZ MEMORANDUM Endorse TO: City Manager Modifie FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Re J eote .. SUBJECT: Lot Division Time Extension Date LOCATION: 1230 Sterling Street South (Ski -Jump Property) DATE: September 18, 1992 INTRODUCTION Mr. Tom Harrington is requesting that the City Council approve a time extension for a lot division. Mr. Harrington represents the St. Paul Educational Foundation. They own the ski club property. The Foundation wants to create a 180 - x 200 -foot lot to sell the existing house at 1230 Sterling Street. (See the map on page 4.) BACKGROUND The City Council approved the lot division and a subdivision code variation on September 23, 1991. One of the conditions for the lot division was that the owner record the deeds within one year, unless the City approves a time extension. (See the minutes on pages 4 and 5.) DISCUSSION The Educational Foundation is completing the conditions the City required for the lot division. (See their letter on page 6.) They expect to record the deeds by January 1, 1993. There is no reason to deny the time extension. RECOMMENDATION Approve a time extension until January 1, 1993 for the lot division at 1230 South Sterling Street, mb \mem \1230Ster go/b- 3:memo26b.mem (13 -28) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line Map 3. September 23, 1991 Council minutes 4. Statement from the Saint Paul Educational Foundation MM00 CT. .j OAK-" TAIDOE p CQEST a F OR o HIlLW000 Q OAK RIDGE !±! Ud O Zv V a s °FoR z g LiNwo o AV r.2ON, azzw AV S.1qS.13 pAHt. O Cr CT OORLANO J RDAI/nlPk O H^ g TIMBER TIMBER LN PHV IS C N LI CURRIE CT DR ; 30 2VALLEY VIEW CT vaLL {3 VIEW AV ... C3 LAKEWOOD CT W ''' H19HW000 iA Q' Z 74 MAMIE E 0 b ME M- z tTZ py SOUTH $ CRES 3t SOU- THCREST AV av YOAK 3HTS VOWSHO CHA FItA Cram LOkB oxw000 av Ar • o cRFF Q .. a'C8 0 CARVER AV OVER CIR LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 1 t10 z r A , • . Cyr. PARK d t 40 !O 1 OUTLOT a rr C •ti i 1 2 Is 1 s 3C27 1 . 00000 0 11 04 )3 4 t iii f' N3 •i;.M 20 w11474 • 05) :{ top A0 1 i l i2 Q a D V sa rJ & to , t , 1230 1240 A5 a. 11 ocj. 40) OUT LOT A p r 11473,Uam.. 33. aeei. r W , 1 L I do 4w 40 40 Z y' h, HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO.2 LAND PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS1 ' - - 11%.41 d t 40 !O 1 OUTLOT a rr C •ti i 1 2 Is 1 s 3C27 1 . 00000 0 11 04 )3 4 t iii f' N3 •i;.M 20 w11474 • 05) :{ top A0 1 i l i2 Q a D V sa rJ & to , t , 1230 1240 A5 a. 11 ocj. p W 1 I n o iCc i+i is ter::.•:.•.•.• 7 77 PONDD i PiP :: +:.E LIN E GG V I . . . .... ... I JUMP f t , b`r w r PROPOSE 1EDLOTDtVISI r JIM 4wM0wMMMM=.dww& CB) 4.74 t. PROPERTY LINE MAP PROPERTY IN QUESTION LAND PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC OWNERSHIP 3 Attachment 2 o.s. h. • hrr. • . o INN— Q N 3, T". City Council held a public heari p,g on September , 1991. Cit staff published a notice in the Maplewood Revi and sent notic s to the abutting property owners as requir by law. The Counci gave everyone at the hearing a cha to speak and present itten statements. The Council als onsidered reports and recom ndat i ons from the City staff an 1 ann i ng Commission, WHEREAS, after th City approves these va ti ons, public interest in the property will go to th following propert' s. The North one -half of he vacated urke Avenue and all of Block 17, Sabin Addition to Gl ads ne, Ra ey County, Minnesota (PIN 15- 29 -22- 21- 0084); and The South one -half of th v ated Burke Avenue accruing to and the North 94 feet of Lots th ugh 4, Block 24, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey Co ty, Minn ota (PIN 15- 29- 22- 21- 0092). NOW, THEREFORE, IT RESOLVED tha the City Council approve the above - described easement acations for the fo owing reasons. I. It is ' the public interest. 2. Th a is no need for these easements b ause the City acquired er easements to replace these. Secon ed by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - 11 1 20 7:10 p.m.(7:22 p.m.), Lot Division and Subdivision Cade Variation: 1230 Sterling St. a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a lot division at 1230 Sterling Street. b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission Recommendation. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following appeared. Tom Harrington, President of ,St. Paul Educational Foundation f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 - 09 - 121 SUBDIVISION CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the St. Paul Educational Foundation applied for a variation from the subdivision code to split off' a 180- by 200 -foot lot for the existing house. 9 -23 -91 4 Attachemnt 3 WHEREAS, the legal description of.the property is. In Section 13, Township 28, Range 22, the South 74 feet of the North 1815 feet of the West 1/2 of the S. E. 1/4 and also, the South 825 feet of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.E. 1/4 subject to roads and highways ). This property is also known as 1230 Sterling Street South. WHEREAS, Section 30 -8 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires all lots to abut on a publicly dedicated and maintained street. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to create a lot abutting on public property that is not a dedicated and maintained street. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this variation of September 3, 1991. They recommended that the City Council approve the variation. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 23, 1991. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the Phearingachancetospeak and present wri tten statements . The Counci 1 al so cons i deeed reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described variation for the following reasons. I. It is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Subdivision Code. 2. The proposed lots meet all City size standards. 3. The owners are not proposing any development. 4. Existing driveways provide access to the two proposed lots. This approval shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. The owners placing a deed restriction on the northerly lot that would prohibit any additional building without getting City approval. 2. The owner deeding Outl of A of the Maplewood Highlands Addition and the west 33 feet of their property to the City. 3. The owner recording the deeds for the lot division within one year, unless the City approves a time extension. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 5 9 -23 -91 THE SAINT PAUL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION, INC 2278 Timberlea Drive Woodbur MN 55125 September 10, 1992 Mr, Geoff 'Olson, Communit Development Director Cit of Maplewood 1830 East Count Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: This is to re a three month time extension for recordin the deeds as covered b the Council action on September 23, 1991 (cop enclosed). The final details of this transaction are virtuall completed, and we full expect to be able to file the deeds within the three month period. Yours ver trul Z Thomas L. Harrin Presi 0ent Saint Paul Educational Foundation Attachment 4 Faw y MEMORANDUM TO:City Manager FROM:Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT:Conditional Use Permit Review LOCATION:1255 Cope Avenue PROJECT:Northern Hydraulics DATE:September 18, 1992 INTRODUCTION fiction by Council:, Endorse -,...- Mcdif ied.. .... Rej ecte _. Date _._ The City Council should review the conditional use permit (CUP) at 1255 Cope Avenue, The CUP allows a commercial building within 350 feet of a residential district. BACKGROUND September 24, 1994: The City Council approved this CUP. June 24, 1991: The Council revised this CUP to change the store hours and require the owner to replace weeds and dead grass with sod. Northern Hydraulics sodded their lot as the Council required. September 23, 1991 The Council reviewed the CUP and required a review in one year DISCUSSION Marna Gerke (1252 Cope Court) recently complained about Northern Hydraulics. Ms. Gerke said that Northern Hydraulics had been displaying materials outside their building, had parked asemi- trailer on the site for several days and had lights that glare. See her letter on page 6.) I talked to Pete Solum of Northern Hydraulics about these complaints. Mr. Solum said that since Ms. Gerke's complaint, they repainted the fronts of the light lenses black to stop the glare. He said they sometimes move materials outside while they unload trucks. They do this because the building does not have enough space. He said that since they got rid of a large tractor, the exterior storage should not be a problem anymore. They used the semi - trailer for a week -long sale for extra pstoragespace. The semi- trailer has been removed. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit at 1255 Cope Avenue again in one year. 6 1 tl 40-% 23- 3, 4 r, , o a oI24: . kn nr gg 61 & ZT Z Z60 ,3 r j , cal as • p 8 • two sc %40 b _ •,,,ten,. ' 1.55a dn+ • 90ac. • JQ A 4. 9 at. • JQ r' 20 0 60 t i. 9 a ), 19 03 -0 ) 2O zo i `7. 5eg b •S. P%CCCDG t., 127i& J H r LARK AVE. ilk • I: 1 1 C Z W PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Q N 4 Attachment 2 HWY, 36 0 VIK 12 00 Exc.ss fak;w sr, 7::: j Di v+ C+ D" r t • : - i 'r1••i v: 18 NORTHERN • HYDRAULY`CS SITE rl 100 I i o ' n 0 r 7r I I i 4 ....•.•.•. •.•.•.•.•.:•.•.•:.•.•:•:•:•:•:• 0 2303 - C 3° 14 -. ,,.. _ F Z O 12.)CIO '1 I HIGHWAY 35 - Qi i •ter fui NO TH tt CPARMGOP ss =ma 37 SPACES 1 IT 2 FwC CAPPED SPACES • . v r ' r. t :• •:':' - :39 TOTAL SPACES .. . ; • . .. _V ..,. f M APPROVED SITE PLAN N Attachment 3 September 1 , 1992 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Rd, B. Maplewood, MN 55109 Attn: Mr. Ken Roberts Dear Mr. Roberts: SEP A couple of weeks ago I wrote to you inquiring as to whether or not the outdoor storage of trailers, lawn tractors and a full - size tractor was permissible at Northern Hydraulics 1255 Cope Avenue. I also mentioned that at that time a semi - trailer had been located in their parking lot for several days. All of these are not permissible from my understanding. This letter is simply to make you aware that the largest of these items, the semi- trailer, is still parked in their lot, not having been moved whatsoever since its arrival. I am assuming this large white semi - trailer with Northern's logo is used as 1) either advertising or 2) storage of merchandise. In either case it is backed up to their dock directly against the building, lending credence toward its being used as extra storage - outdoor. On a further note related tO your letter of 8/30/91 to Pete Solum of Northern, Inc, the 3 lights located on the south of the building were painted black to alleviate the glare. That paint has now worn off, and it would be pleasing if they could be re- painted before the onset of fall and winter when the lighting is more noticable, minus foilage lessening the brightness. I did jot a note to John Rose at Northern's corporate office requesting this. My office number is 627 -4356, and home 483 -3803 if a phone call is convenient and time - saving for you. Sincerely, Marna Gerke 1252 Cope Ave. Maplewood, MN E. 55109 6 Attachment 4 S MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION C Manager Endorse Modifi Director of Community Development Re • ec tshorelandOrdinanceGrant .gat e September 18, 1992 I am requesting that the City Council approve the attached resolution. This resolution requests a grant of up to $5,000 from the State. The grant would pay for the costs of updating the Cites shoreland ordinance. The State is requiring that Maplewood update its shoreland ordinance by September 1, 19940 RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution. go \b- 3:shorgran.mem ( attachment: resolution STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SHORELAND GRANT APPLICATION WHEREAS, the State,as provided by Minnesota Statutes 103F.201-221 and Minnesota Rules parts 6120,2500 through 6120.3900 pertaining to Statewide Standards for Management of Shoreland Areas "; and WHEREAS, the State is authorized by the Laws of 1991, Chapter 254, Section 5, Subd 3 to provide grant assistance for Cities to adopt a shoreland management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. NOW THEREFORE, subject to available funding, it is hereby requested by the City of Je k/o that an agreement be entered into by the State of Minnesota, acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources and the City of to provide grant money assistance up to $5,000.00 matching fund dollars, for the purposes of adopting a shoreland management ordinance consistent with statewide standards. BY: Mayor DATE: r000 1 MEMORAND Aotion by Counci Endorsed Igodifie Re j ected~......_.... Date TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk DATE: September 23, 1992 RE: SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION - 2240 HAZELWOOD On October 23, 1991 the City Council approved Mrs. Judy Baler's request to place the costs of connecting her home to sanitary sewer on her real estate taxes due to hardship. The work has been completed and state- ments from the sewer installer submitted. Council authorization is requested to `send the necessary resolution to Ramsey County to certify $7,650.00 to Mrs. Bai.er's real estate taxes and to pay Woodbury Mechanical to install the sewer to the home. The amount $7,650.00 consists of: Cash Connection Charge - 75' x $35.00 Woodbury Mechanical S.A.C. 2,625.00 4,400.Ofl A , ) c. nn TOTAL $7,650.00 Approval of this action is requested. LA /pf AGENDA NO. I TO: City Manager FROM: RE. DATE: Assistant City Manager AGENDA REPORT k c d1 Me dif - ReSected_..--. -... Date .w CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT September 21, 1992 INTRODUCTION On September 14, 1992, the City Council conducted a public hearing about the proposed community center project. Due to the time constraints of the agenda, the public hearing was held for one hour and fifteen minutes and then recessed until 6:00 p.m., Monday, September 28. BACKGROUND The City Council requested some additional information for the continuation of the public hearing: the estimated increase in City taxes payable in 1994 on a home valued at $120,000 and $150 ,000 due to the construction of the center; and the results of the community survey conducted by Decision Resources, Ltd. in mid- September regarding the community center. Staff has also included a summary of the public comment sheets that we received near the model in the lobby. Estimated increases in property taxes The following numbers are estimates of the increase in City property taxes due to the construction of the proposed center. A $60,000 valued home 4 A $80,000 valued home 7 A $100,000 valued home 10 A $120,000 valued home 13 A $150,000 valued home 17 The actual amount will be affected by changes in the Cites tax base, HACA, fiscal disparities, timing of bond sales, interest rates on the bonds, and factors that determine the annual tax increment revenues for the six tax increment districts. 1 Second Community Survey On August 10, 1992, the City Council authorized Decision Resources, Ltd. to conduct a second telephone survey of Maplewood residents. The survey instrument consisted of 97 questions about City services, development, road design, assessment policies, and the community center. In total, 400 residents were randomly selected to received a phone call based on the City's 13 planning neighborhoods. For the purpose of this report, only the results of the questions about the community center will be summarized. There were nine questions about the community center in the survey. The community center section from the survey is provided below. As you may know, the City of Maplewood is considering building a community center. 1. Do you favor or oppose the construction of a STRONGLY FAVOR ......... 26% Maplewood Community Center? And do you SOMEWHAT FAVOR ......... 34% feel strongly that way? SOMEWHAT OPPOSE ........ 11% STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 16% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED ..... 14% If "SUPPORT' or "OPPOSE," ask: 2. Why do you feel that way: NO ANSWER, 2 %; NEEDED, 37 %; GOOD FOR CITY, 10 %; COST HIGH, 9 %; NO NEED, 21%; GOOD FOR KIDS, 15 %; NEED MORE INFORMATION, 6 %. The Maplewood Community Center is the largest project that has ever been considered by the City of Maplewood. As currently designed, it includes two gymnasiums, a leisure and exercise pool, meeting rooms, senior and teen areas, a 300 -seat performing arts theater, exercise and weight facilities, banquet facilities with a catering kitchen, running/walking track, and multi- purpose activity room for such things as arts and crafts, dance, and aerobics. The estimated cost of the proposed community center project is $13 million, which includes the cost of land and building construction. Of that amount, approximately $7 million would be available through tax increment funds. To cover the remaining $6 million, the yearly property tart increase on an average $80,000 home would be approximately $7. 3. Would you support or oppose this property tax STRONGLY SUPPORT ... 29% increase for the construction of the community SUPPORT ........... 32% center? Do you feel strongly that way? OPPOSE ............ 15% STRONGLY OPPOSE .... 18% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED .. 6% The community center will be located on White Bear Avenue just south of County Road B adjacent to City Hall. Based on our previous discussion of the facilities to be included, please tell me how many members of this household would probably.... 4. Visit the community center on a frequent, at 0 68 %; 1, 10 %; 2, 12 %; 3, 5 %; least weekly, basis? 4 3 %; 5 3 %; 6 1%. 2 5. Visit the community center on an occasional, 4, 5O %; 1, 14 %; 2, 17 %; 3, 9 %; perhaps monthly, basis? 4 7 %; 5,3 %; 6,1%. If a community center were built, the City would face two choices on charging user fees. First, the City could subsidize the operation of the center through general tax revenue and keep user fees low. Or, second, the City could require the facility to be self - sufficient, requiring much higher user fees. 6. Which course of action would you favor -- should SUBSIDIZE .......... 37% the City subsidize operating costs through general DON'T SUBSIDIZE ..... 51% tax revenues or not? DON'T KNOW /REFUSED . 13% To cover the operating costs of the community center, the City may charge moderate fees to athletic facility users. In this way, operating expenses incurred by the City could be decreased. It might be helpful to discuss comparable fees. The family membership at the YMCA costs 685 yearly, while U.S. Swim and Fitness membership costs $648. Cities tend to charge less. Chaska charges its families $175 yearly, while the Shoreview yearly family membership fees are $323. 7. Would the charge of a moderate fee for a daily YES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23% pass to use facilities, such as the swimming NO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53% pools, gymnasiums, and arts and crafts rooms, DEPENDS ON FEE . . . . . 14% significantly decrease your use of those DON'T KNOW /REFUSED . 11 % facilities, or not? The City might offer individual memberships to recreational facility users. Members would have unlimited access to all facilities. 8. How much would you be willing to pay yearly for an individual membership. Let's say, would you be willing to pay $ ? (Depending on response, choose next higher or lower category.) How about $ ? NOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . 38% 50 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 17% 75 000060000 000 ease*7% 100 ...............12% 125 ................4% 150 ................4% 175 ................1% 200 ................5% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED .14% The City might also offer family memberships to recreational facility users. Members would have unlimited access to all facilities. 9. How much would you be willing to pay yearly for a family membership. Let's say, would you be willing to pay $ (Depending on response, choose the next higher or lower category.) How How about $ ? NOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . 35% 50 066*69999 Goo 0000 10% 100 ...............10% 150 ................9% 200 ...............10% 250 ................4% 300 ................4% 350 ................5% DON'T KNOW /REFUSED .13% 3 Dr. Bill Morris summarized the findings and made some comparisons to the 1989 survey results. His report is attached. There are five main categories of questions: construction of a center, property tax increase, subsidizing the operations with general tax revenue, daily user fees, and annual memberships. In general, there was a positive and supportive attitude about the construction of a community center. Sixty percent (60 %) favored the construction while 27% opposed it. Sixty -one percent (61 %) would favor the property tax increase, and 33% would oppose it. Fifty -one percent (51%) opposed the idea of the City subsidizing the operations through general tax revenue, and 37% favored subsidization. Fifty -three percent (53 %) of the residents would attend the center despite a daily user fee, and 23% would be affected by a moderate fee. A $1.50 family membership to the center would attract 32% of the households, and by lowering the cost of the membership to $100, ten percent more households would join. Dr. Morris compared the results of the 1989 survey with the latest survey. "In comparison with the 1989 Maplewood Residential Survey, support for the concept of a community center has increased by 4 %, while opposition has increased by 2 %. The rationales for each position have remained unchanged from the earlier study. When faced with a specific project, rather than the open -ended center described in 1989, potential usership decreased by ten percent - -at 73% in the earlier study. Opinions about the subsidization of operations through the use of general tax revenue remain virtually unchanged from the earlier survey - -a majority oppose the use of tax money for this purpose. In addition, the percentage of residents who would not be impacted by the charge of a moderate daily fee for the use of athletic facilities remain fairly constant. However, there was a doubling - -from 12% to 23 % - -of residents who would definitely decrease their use of the community center, and a halving of residents - -from 27% to 14 %- -who stated it depended on the size of the fee. Interests in the purchase of a community center membership has also declined. In 1989, 21% of the sample reported they would buy an individual membership if the cost were no more than $75; currently, that figure is 33 %. In 1989, 44% volunteered they would be willing to purchase a family membership if the cost were, at most, $150; in this recent survey, 32% reported the same inclination. Clearly, there is more fee sensitivity among residents in this survey than in the 1989 reading." Results of "YOUR OPINION COUNTS" - Comment form available to the public near the model being displaYed in the lobby When the City Council accepted the preliminary design from the architectural firm of AKR, they directed staff to display the model in the lobby and solicit comments from the public about the project. As of Monday, September 21, the following comments had been received: In Favor of the Center: 41 forms Reasons for the support: Use by children; family is using Shoreview facility now; focal point for residents is needed; activities for all age groups needed; existing facilities are full to capacity. Not in Favor of the Center: 84 forms 4 Reasons for not supporting the project: Too costly; tough economic times; facilities are currently available in schools and parks; taxes are too high; seniors on a fixed income and can't afford more taxes; location is inaccessible. Forty -four of the forms were from residents living on Londin Lane. In Favor but want a smaller project: 3 forms Unrelated or Anonymous: 15 forms Phone Calls Four phone calls were received in Manager's office offering their name, address and opinion. They stated that they were unable to attend the meetings. The four comments were in favor of the project. RECOMMENDATION The City Council has two options -not to proceed with the project or to go ahead with it. 1. If the Council votes not to go forward with the project, there would be no further recommended action. 2. If the City Council votes to proceed with the proposed project, they should: A. Direct staff to request proposals for a construction management firm; and B. Direct the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the architectural firm of Ankeny, Kell, and Richter for the design development in accordance with the previously negotiated fee structure. tmc 5 3.128 Dean Court • .Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 • (612) 920 -.0337 AGENDA ITEM (7 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council;3 Endorsed.______„_, TO: City Manager Modified.____, Rejected FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date SUBJECT: County. Road C -TH 61 to Hazelwood, Project 89- 04— Public Hearing DATE: September 21, 1992 Introduction A resolution is attached to order this project. A public information meeting is scheduled on Thursday, September 24, 1992, from 3 to 6 p.m. Attached is a copy of the project summary that was mailed with the notice of public hearing. Background A copy of the August 18, 1992, agenda report is attached for reference. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. jc Attachments RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AFTER PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, after due notice of public hearing on the construction of bituminous street, concrete curb and .gutter,, storm sewer, sidewalk, utility modifications, and bridge on County Road C from TH 61 to Hazelwood Street, City Project 89 -04, a hearing on said improve- ment in accordance with the notice duly given was duly held on Monday, September 28, 1992, and the council has heard all persons desiring to be heard on the matter and has fully considered the same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. That it is advisable, expedient and necessary that the City of Maplewood construct bituminous street, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, sidewalk, utility modifications, and bridge on County Road C from TH 61 to Hazelwood Street, City Project 89-04 as described in the notice of hearing thereof, and orders the some to be made. 2. The mayor is authorized to execute cooperative agreements with Ramsey County and Minnesota Department of Transportation to implement this project. 3. The project budget is amended to $571,000. The project financing shall be as follows: Special assessments $150,250 Off- system MSA transfer 297,750 General obligation 123,000 571,000 CITY OF pi EWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 612-770-4 5 50 September 16, 1992 Dear Property Owner: An informal .public information session will be held on Thursday, September 24, 1992, between the hours of 3 p.m. and 6 p.m. in the council .chambers at city hall, 1830 East County Road B in Maplewood. Representatives from Ramsey County and the city's engineering deportment will be present during this open house period to explain the general purpose and nature of the proposed Project 89 -04: County Road C reconstruction from Trunk Highway 61 to Hazelwood Avenue. It is hoped that we may be able to explain and answer any questions that you may have . concerning your property so that you will be well informed should you attend the public hearing on September 28, 19920 Department of Public Works Equal Opportunity Employer COUNTY ROAD C - -TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD CITY PROJECT 89 -04 PROJECT SUMMARY Proposed Improvements The existing road is to be entirely removed. It would be replaced with a street that is 40 -feet wide from curb to curb. This would provide fora 12 -foot wide travel lane for east and west traffic and a striped 8-foot wide shoulder on each side of the road. No parking restrictions are proposed on the shoulders. The street would be bituminous (asphalt) with concrete curb and gutters. A 5 -foot wide concrete sidewalk is .proposed next to the south right -of -way line. A- typical existing and proposed cross section is shown on the revere side. Driveways will be restored with the some material to existing width, subject to 12 -feet wide minimum and 22- feet wide maximum. A 5 -foot wide concrete driveway apron will be for each driveway. All disturbed turf will be replaced with sod. All existing clay the sanitary sewer services will be replaced within the right of way. .Existing utilities will be adjusted /repaired as necessary at no cost to match the new roadway. A storm sewer system will be constructed. At Trunk Highway 61, the width of County Road C will be widened to provide for turn lanes. The frontage road north of County Road C will be reconstructed to the east to alleviate problems of the existing intersection. The Minnesota Department of Transportation proposed to construct o "Park and Ride" lot on the southwest corner of TH 61 and County Road C as part of the project. Financing Assessments are proposed within the area shown on the drawing on the reverse side. Assessment rates are proposed as follows: Residential street assessment $1185.00 /unit Residential storm sewer assessment 525.00 /unit Commercial storm sewer assessment 0.10 /SF At these rates, the assessment recovery is $150,250. A summary of city costs and financing follows: Cost: Payable to Ramsey County $475,600.00 Engineering and indirect costs 95,400.00 Total cost $571,000.00 Financing: Street assessment 80 units @ 1185 /unit = $94,800.00 Storm sewer assessment 74 units @ 525 /unit = 38,850.00 Commercial storm sewer 166,246 SF @ 0.10 /SF = 16,600.00 Off- system MSA transfer 297,750.00 General obligation 123,000.00 Total financing $571,000.00 Additional Information Additional information may be obtained by attending the informal public information meeting any time between 3 and 6 p.m. on Thursday, September 24, 1992. The meeting will be held in the council chambers of city hall at 1830 East County Road B. If you are unable to attend the meeting and have questions, please call Bruce Irish at 770 -4550. L 1W a V i X70 t AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: County Road C —TH 61 to Hazelwood, City Project 89- 04-- Schedule Public Hearing DATE: August 18, 1992 Introduction In September 1989 this project was ordered at a public hearing. Due to delay in obtaining federal funds to replace the bridge and other causes, the project was not built. Ramsey County expects required funds to be available for 1993 construction. The county has proposed the attached cooperative agreement. It is requested that a public hearing be scheduled to reauthorize the project. Background The plans for the project are on file in the engineering department. A copy of the study report is attached. Budaet Imp= Assessments are proposed within the area shown on the attached drawing. Properties proposed to be assessed are listed on the attached spreadsheets. Assessment rates are proposed as follows: Residential street assessment $1185.00 /unit Residential storm sewer assessment $ 525.00 /unit Commercial storm sewer assessment $ 0.10 /SF At these rates, the assessment recovery is $150,250. This is 26.3 percent of the total project cost of $571.,000. Municipal State Aid funds in the amount of about $297,750 are available to pay for roadway - related items under an off- system transfer. The balance of project cost is proposed to be paid by general obligation taxes. This is permitted because the assessment recovery exceeds 20 percent. A table summary of financing follows. Cost: Payable to Ramsey County Engineering and indirect costs Total cost Financing: Street assessment 80 units @ 1185 /unit Storm sewer assessment 74 units @ 525 /unit = Commercial storm sewer 166,246 SF @ 0.10 /SF = Off- system MSA transfer General obligation Total financing Recommendation 475,600.00 95.400.00 571,000.00 94,800.00 38,850.00 16,600.00 297,750.00 123,000.00 571,000.00 It is recommended that a public hearing be scheduled for 7 p.m. on September 28, 1992. n iW Attachments RESOLUTION ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the city. engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to .prepare a report with reference to the improvement of County Road CTH 61 to Hazelwood, City Project 89 -04, by construction of street with concrete curb and gutter, new bridge,, storm sewer, sidewalk and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said city engineer has prepared the .aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the city engineer advising this council that the proposed improvement on County Road CTH 61 to Hazelwood, City Project 89 -04 by construction of street with concrete curb and gutter, new bridge, storm sewer, sidewalk and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $571.,000. 3. A public hearing will be held in the council chambers of the city hall at 1830 East. County Road B on Monday, the 28th day of September, 1992, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The city clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. tA - RAMSEY COUNTY July 28, 1992 Ramsey County Department of Public Works Paul L. Kirkwold, - Director and County Engineer Kenneth Haider City Engineer . City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road 8 Maplewood, MN 55109 County Road C - T.H. 61 to Hazelwood Agreement 92016 S.A.P. 62- 623 -34 & 35 S.P. 62- 623 -36 Sr. 62554 S.P. 6222 -118 (T.H. 61 -1) Park & Ride S.A.P. 138- 010 -05 Administration Land Survey 350 St. Peter St. Suite 270 Sit. Pant MN/55102 612) 2984127 FAX 292 -6515 Engineering Operations 3377 N. Rice St. Shoreview MN/55126 612) 484 -9104 FAX 482 -5232 Accompanying -is a draft of our proposed cooperative agreement for this project along with a set of bridge plans. Road plans were previouslysubmittedwithacopyofourJuly171992 "letter to Mn /DOT requestingqgtheypreparethethreepartyagreementneededfortheproject. . We have submitted the right of way certificate for the bridge and believe that -Mn /DOT is now reviewing the detail plans prior to scheduling -a letting. If you have any revisions needed in the road plans, pleaseadviseuseWehavereviewedtheroadplansandwilladviseour consultant, SEH, to submit them to Mn /DOT for approval with Y our comments. The cost estimates should be updated and the bituminous and testing items reviewed to assure they conform to the latest practice.Also, a review of the standard plates is probably needed. We propose to have this project constructed in 1993 with approvals and bids this fall and early winter. Would you lease schedule this ro ' ect for r p p review, approval, right of way acquisition, funding, etc. We probably will get well into the plan approval process before we see the Mn /DOT three party agreement; however, I feel we know what it needs o cover sufficientl to proceed at this time. It would be desi ra a to hav t _Ci earings and approval by September, Wayne R. Leonard, P.E. Special Projects Engineer WRL:m enc. cc: Len Newquist, SEH Recycled Paper JUL 2 9 1992Soybean -Based Ink s • io r 1 . y Agreement 92016 RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Agreement between ROAD 23 COUNTY ROAD C the County of Ramsey S.A.P. 62- 623 -34 and the City of Maplewood S.A.P. 62- 623 -35 Account 47428 Bridge 62554 over B.N. Rye S.P. 62- 623 -36 T.H. 61 N.E. Frontage Road S.A.P. 138- 010 -05 Park & Ride Site S.P. 6222 -118 (T.H. 61 -1) County Road C Estimated Amount Receivable T.H. 61 to Hazelwood from City of Maplewood: Reconstruction, Bridge Replacement at Burlington Bridge $ 0.00 Northern Right of Way,Park & Ride 0100 N.E. Frontage Road at Sign /EVP 590.00 T.H. 61 Reconstruction to Frontage Road 14,983.64 Kohlman Avenue and Overlay Storm Sewer 94,371.68 to T.H. 61 and Park and Ride utility Improve. 68,499.00 Development in S.W. Corner Conc. Walk 30,603.30 of T.H. 610 Conc. Curb "C" 40,940.10 Road 24' 225,612.46 Total $475,600.18 Attachments: Engineers Estimates Construction Cost Participation Cost Participation Summary THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County and the City desire to construct and rebuild County Road C, from T.H. 61 to Hazelwood Street, replace Bridge 7279 over the Burlington Northern Railway, reconstruct and relocate the Northeast Frontage Road at County Road C and T.H. 61 from County Road C to Kohlman Avenue and overlay the Northeast Frontage Road from Kohlman Avenue North to T.H. 61, cooperate with the Minnesota Department of Transportation in the construction of a Park and Ride site in the Southwest quadrant of the intersection of T.H. 61 and County Road C, construct a storm water sedimentation basin adjacent to T.H. 61 in the Kohlman Lake Wetlands, replace the traffic signal at the T.H. 61 and County Road C intersection andinterconnectthenewsignaltotheT.H. 61 and Beam Avenue signal,and g ' 92016 -1 WHEREAS, County Road C from 512 feet west of T.H. 61 to 100 feet east of Hazelwood Street and the Northeast Frontage Road from County Road C to T.H. 61 and the sedimentation pond in the Kohlman Lake area and the Park and Ride site and the signal are in the City; and WHEREAS, the work contemplated under this agreement has been divided into two separate plans which provide for the bridge9 replacement and road reconstruction; and WHEREAS, this road project, from 512 feet west of T.H. 61 to 100 feet east of Hazelwood Street - except for that portion from 36 feet east to 591 feet east of Elm Street, has been designated by Mn /DOT as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the Count State Aid Highway funds and identified as S.A.P. 62- 623 -34; and WHEREAS, this road project f rom ' 36 feet east to 591 feet east of Elm Street, except for Bridge 62554, has been designated by the Mn /DOT as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the County State Aid Highway funds and identified as S.A.P. 62- 623 -35; and WHEREAS, the replacement of Bridge 7274 over the Burlington Northern right of way with Bridge 62554 has been designated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation as eligible for certain construction costs reimbursement from the Federal and State Bridge Replacement and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) funds identified as S.P. 62- 623 -36 Bridge 62554; and WHEREAS, the County will have a separate Maintenance and Operation agreement with the Burlington Northern Railway concerning the bridge; and WHEREAS, the cost participation for the Park & Ride site in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of County Road C and T.H. 61 is being covered by a separate agreement between Mn /DOT, the City and the County; and WHEREAS, the signal system at the intersection of County Road C and T.H. 61, and any necessary modifications to it, is covered by an. existing agreement between Mn /DOT and the County; and WHEREAS, plans for this project S.P. 62- 623 -36, Bridge 62554, S.A.P. 62- 623 -34 and S.A.P. 62- 623 -35 showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross sections for the improvement of County State Aid Highway 23 within the limits of the City as a County State Aid Highway project have been presented to the City; and WHEREAS, the grading provisions require acquisition of certain right of way and temporary construction and slope easements p rior to construction; and WHEREAS, the projects include, in addition to other things, right of way acquisition, grading, paving, concrete curb and gutters, walks, storm sewer, sedimentation pond, Frontage Road reconstruction and overlay, Park and Ride site development, bridge replacement, signal replacement and interconnect and City utility improvements. and adjustments; and 92016 -2 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will determine allowable credit for storm sewer outfall lines previously constructed prior to the project, and the resulting portion of this storm sewer system eligible for County State Aid and Municipal State Aid Highway funds. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The County shall prepare or cause to be prepared through it.s consultant, SEH, necessary plans, specifications and proposals, take bids and recommend award of a contract for the construction of Bridge 62554 to be awarded by the Minnesota Department of Transportation; the County shall perform the construction inspection. 2. Upon completion of Bridge 62554, The County shall own and maintain the bridge; however, the Burlington Northern Railway or its assignees shall be responsible for usage and operation for the rail opening and shall provide normal maintenance and access for that usage. 3. The County shall prepare or cause to be prepared through its consultant, SEH, the necessary plans, descriptions and estimates and with the approval of the City and the Minnesota Department of Transportation acquire the necessary rights of way for the bridge replacement from the Burlington Northern Railway in accordance with procedures for reimbursement from State Aid funds. County acquired right of way from the Burlington Northern. Railway will include provisions to perpetuate the existing drainage of the tracks but will not. include provisions for the City utility crossing of the Railway right of way. 4. Right of way required for the Bridge construction is estimated to be 100% eligible for CSAH funds reimbursement and this portion shall be paid by the County. 5. Temporary right of way across the Burlington Northern Railway required for the County Road C bypass construction is also eligible for CSAH funds reimbursement and this portion shall be paid by the County. 6. The County shall have a separate agreement with the Burlington Northern Railway for the construction, maintenance and operation of the bridge, 7. The County shall prepare or cause to be prepared through its consultant, SEH, the necessary plans, specifications and proposals, take bids, and with concurrence of Mn /DOT.and the City, award a contract for the roadway construction; S.A.P. 62- 623 -34 & 35 the County shall perform the construction inspection. 8. The City shall acquire and pay for all rights of way and easements required for the construction of the road projects within the City except those on County -owned and State property. 9. All County Road C rights of way and temporary easements will be in the name of the County, and parking and other regulations 92016 -3 will be controlled by the County. Any rights of way which cannot be negotiated will be acquired through eminent domain proceedings and thereafter assigned by the City to the County. 10. The City shall pay to the County, the cost of emergency vehicle pre - emption system modifications required at the T.H. 61 signal system as provided under existing signal agreements. Mn /DOT and the County will pay the remainder of the signal modification cost and the interconnect to Seam Avenue. 11. Maintenance and operation of the T.H. 61 signal system shall be as provided under existing signal agreements. 12. The City shall pay to the County its cost of the N.*E. Frontage Road improvements as provided in a separate three party agreement with Mn /DOT. 13. Ownership, operation and maintenance of the N.E. Frontage Road shall be as provided in the separate three party agreement with Mn /DOT. 14. The storm sewer specifications including the eligible for construction funds plus funds from Mn /DOT shall pay for that portion of eligible for County State Aid system as shown in the plans and sedimentation pond, is estimated to be cost reimbursement by County State Aid for the Park and Ride site. The County the storm sewer system determined to be and Mn /DOT funds reimbursement. 15. The City shall pay for the construction cost of the portion of. the storm sewer system which is attributable to contributing area from the City outside the road right of way and not eligible for reimbursement from County State Aid Highway or Mn /DOT funds. 16. Upon completion of the project, the County shall own and maintain the storm sewer catchbasins and leads and the City shall own and maintain the storm sewer trunk lines. Laterals and drains servicing property Outside the road right of way shall also be owned and maintained by the City. The City shall maintain the sedimentation pond. 17. The City shall pay to the County 75% of the cost of concrete curb and gutters constructed on County right of way within the City except for replacement of existing concrete curb and gutters. 18. The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of concrete walk constructed within the City except for replacement of existing walks, medians and'walk included in the bridge. 19. The City shall pay to the County 100% of the cost of City utility extensions or improvements provided in the plan. 20. The City shall assist the County in the inspection of the sanitary sewer and watermain construction. The City shall lead discussions with the City of St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners on interpretation and administration of the plans and specifications relating to the waterworks facilities within the 92016 -4 21. All City utilities or facilities modified or added to those provisions presently made in the plans and specifications may be incorporated in the construction contract by supplemental agreement and shall be paid for as specified in the supplemental agreement. 22. Upon completion of the work on the sanitary and watermain systems, the City shall own and maintain the systems.* 23.. The County shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of roadway improvement west of Engineers Station 12 +76.8 where the improvement is more than two travel lanes wide except as provided above. 24. The County shall pay one hundred percent (100 %) of the cost of the center twenty -four feet ( two twelve -foot travel lanes) except as provided above. 25. The City shall pay to the County seventy -five percent (75 %) of all costs for County Road C construction east of Engineers Station 12 +76.8, not otherwise provided for above and the County shall pay the remaining twenty -five percent (25 %). These items of the roadway improvements outside the center twenty -four feet are identified in the plan statement of estimated quantities under the Maplewood MSAP 138. 020 -06 column and in the Engineers Estimate construction costs. 26. Quantity and cost distribution identified above are shown in the engineer's estimate. Actual costs shall be based on the contractor's unit prices and the quantities constructed. 27. Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and specifications are hereby in all things approved. 28. All liquidated damages connection with the work performed on credit shared by Mn /DoT, the City proportion as their respective total s the total construction cost without damages. assessed the contractor in the project shall result in a and the County in the same hare of construction work is to any deduction for liquidated 29. The City shall pay ten percent (10 %) of its share of the construction cost, as determined by the contract proposed to be awarded, to the County as a preliminary engineering fee. This fee shall be due after receipt of bids and prior to award of the construction contract. 30. In addition to the shall pay eight percent (8 %) as determined by the final construction engineering f notification to the City of contractor, preliminary engineering fee, the City of its share of the construction cost, contract amounts, to the County as a ee. This fee shall be due upon the estimated final amounts due to the 31. All charges for services within the City by the City of St. shall be paid for by the City, such as inspection and supervision Paul Board of Water Commissioners 92016 -5 320 The City shall. not assess or otherwise recover any portion of its cost for this project through levy on County -owned property. 33. The County shall, when a construction contract is proposed to. be awarded, prepare a revised estimate and cost participation breakdown based on construction contract unit prices and submit a copy to the City. The City agrees to advance to the Treasurer of Ramsey County an amount equal to the City total construction cost share plus preliminary engineering costs. The. contractor shall then be paid by the County. 34. Upon substantial completion of the work, the County shall prepare a revised estimate of -cost participation breakdown based upon the contract unit prices and the actual units of work estimated to have been performed and submit a copy to the City. The construction engineering costs to be paid the County by the City shall be based on this estimated final construction cost. The County shall . add to the City's estimated final construction costs the preliminary engineering based on the contract as awarded and construction engineering costs, make necessary adjustments for liquidated damages, if any, and deduct City funds previously advanced for the project by the City. The City agrees to pay to the County any amounts due, be it more or less than the estimated sum of the first revised estimate. In the event the calculations show that the City has advanced funds in greater amount than is due the County, the County shall refund the amount to the City without interest. 35. Preliminary plans reviewed at the public hearing and final plans and specifications are hereby in all things approved. 92016-6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed, CITY OF Maplewood THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY By Mayor 8y City Manager Date Recommended for approval: Paul L. Kirkwold Director and . County Engineer By: Hal Norgard, Chairperson Board of County Commissioners Attest: By: Chief Clerk - County Board Date: By: Risk Management Date: Approved as to Form: By• Assistant County Attorney Date: 92016 -7 J. r. MAPLEWOOD CONSTRUCTION COST PARTICIPATION County Road C T.H. 61 to Hazelwood S.A.P. 62- 623 -34 & 35 S.P. 62- 623 --36 Br. 62554 S.P. 6222 -1.18 (T.H. 61 =1) Agreement 92016 Based on Engineers Estimate dated 1/24/91 Bridge S.P.62- 623 -36 Br. 62554 0000 Park & Ride S.P.6222 -118 (T.H. 61 =1)0100 Signals EVP Relocation = $500 x 100%500.00 Frontage Road See Engineers Estimate 12,698.00 Road S.A.P. 62- 623 -35 Br. Approaches Conc. Curb & Gutter B -624 900 L.F. @ $6.00 x 75% =4,050.00 4 Concrete Walk 2,530 S.F. @ 1.50 x 100% =3,795.00 Outside Center 24' 34,392 x 75%See Engineers Estimate 25,799.00 S.A.P. 62- 623 -34 County Road C Utility Imprs.See Engineers Estimate 58,050.00 Conc. Curb & Gutter B -624 61810 L.F. @ 6.00 x 75%30,645.00 4" Conc. Walk r 14,760 S.F. @ 1.50 x 100%22,140900 Storm Sewer County Road C Est. 70% County 30% City* 170,282 x 30% = $51,084.60 Frontage Rd.Est. 90% Mn /DOT & 10% City* 19,008 x 10%1,900.80 Outfall Line Pond - Est. 20% Mn /DOT, 60% county &20% City* 134,956 x 20% _ $ 26,991.20 City Storm Sewer Estimate =79,976.60 Storm Sewer cost participation has not been reviewed by Mn /DOT hydraulics. Percentage splits shown are for purpose of demonstrating method of calculation only. WRL:m 7/92 Page 1 of 2 t MAPLEWOOD CONSTRUCTION COST PARTICIPATION Agreement 92016 OUTSIDE CENTER 24' EAST OF STATION 12 +76.8 S.A.P."62- 623 -34 Outside Center 24' Mobilization 0.85 58,600 A9 23 13,478 Common Excavation 28,900 3.00 86,700 11,560 34,680 Granular Borrow 10,760 5.00 53,800 4 21,520 Select Topsoil 1 7.00 10,080 1,152 8,064 Backhoe 30 90.00 2 8 720 Water 150 12.00 1,800 60 720 Class 4 Agg.120 12.00-1 40 480 Class 6 Agg:5,750 12.00 69,000 1,547 18 41 Wear 1 24.00 47,760 535 12,840 31 Binder 1 19.00 32,870 465 8 31 Base 4,605 19000 87,495 1 23,541 Tack 2,050 1.50 3,075 552 828 6 Conc. Walk 1,830 2100 3,660 1 3 6" Conc. Dr.900 20.00 18,000 838 16,760 Sod 11,950 1.50 17,925 9,560 14,340 Ret. Wall 2,530 16 40,480 2,530 40,480 Traffic Control 0.75 8000 6,000 20 1 220,530 75%Maplewood x.75 165,398 Page 2 of 2 MAPLEWOOD COST PARTICIPATION SUMMARY County Road C T.H. 61 to Hazelwood S.A.P. 62-- 623 -34 & 35 S.A.P. 138- 010 -05 Agreement 92016 Based on Engineers Estimate dated 1/24/91 Item Bridge Park & Ride Signal EVP Frontage Road Storm Sewer Utility Improvement Concrete Walk Concrete Curb "C" Road > 24 TOTALS Constr. Cost 0.00 0.00 500.00 12,6.98.00 79,976.00 58,050.00 25,935.00 34,695.00 191,197 00 403,051.00 Prelim. Eng. 10% 0.00 0.00 50.00 1,269.80 7 997.60 5,805.00 2, 593.50 3,469.50 19,119.70 40,305.10 Constr. Eng. 8% 0.00 0.00 40.00 1,015.84 6,398.08 4,644.00 2,074.80 2,775.60 15, 295.76 Due at Contract Award $443,356.10 32,244.08 Total 0.00 0.00 590.00 14,983.64 94,37.1.68 68,499.00 30,603.30 40,940.10 225,612.46 475,60 -0.18 WRL:m 7/92 STUDY REPORT FOR COUNTY ROAD C FROM TRUNK HIGHWAY 61 TO HAZELWOOD STREET IN MAPLEWOOD RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Recommended for Approval: Maplewood Date Ramsey Cty. Eng. & Dir. of Public Works Date Prepared by: SHORT - ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 222 E. Little Canada Road St. Paul, MN 55117 Prepared for: Ramsey County Public Works Department Kenneth E. Weltzin, P.E. County Engineer and Director of Public Works 350 St. Peter Street Suite 270 St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Draft - March, 1989 Final - Sept. 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING FACILITY 1 EXISTING DEFICIENCIES 3 RECOMMENDED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS 3 RECOMMENDED BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS 4 BRIDGE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 5 ESTIMATED COSTS 7 PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT g RIGHT OF WAY g ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS g TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION 10 TIMELINE 10 PROJECT MANAGER 10 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Project Location Map 2. Typical Section (Existing and Proposed) 3 -5. Recommended Road and Storm Drainage Alternates 6e, Recommended Bridge Alternate 7 -13. Bridge Alternatives 14. Proposed Profile 15. Structure Inventory APPENDICES A. Ramsey County Cost Participation Policy B. Correspondence and Open House Documentation FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR COUNTY ROAD C FROM TRUNK HIGHWAY 61 TO HAZELWOOD STREET INTRODUCTION This feasibility report for County Road C from Trunk Highway 61 to Hazelwood Street has been prepared for the .Ramsey County Public Works Department by Short - Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. This report outlines improvements needed for County Road C, alternatives which have been considered, impacts of such improvements estimated costs, and implementation of improvements. EXISTING FACILITY Roadway From T.H. 61 to Hazelwood Street, County Road C is in the City of Maplewood and is approximately 0.8 miles long. ( See Figure 1.) It serves as a feeder facility from local streets to the arterial street network and has a functional classification of collector. Average daily traffic volume is 2500 and projected traffic volume is 4250 for the year 2010. The current right of way varies from 60 feet to 66 feet, Current land use is primarily residential except for commercial properties at the T.H. 61 intersection. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. County Road C is a 24 feet wide bituminous roadway with narrow unpaved shoulders of approximately 6 feet. A frontage road intersects County Road C approximately 50 feet from its intersection with T.H. 61. Right of way is available to relocate the frontage to the east. 1 - The abandoned Burlington Northern Railway passes under County Road C. The vertical sight distance on County Road C at the railway is adequate for approximately 20 mph. The existing bridge on County Road. C is 30 feet wide and in poor condition. The bridge is deficient in width and carrying capacity. There are no provisions for pedestrians. The Hazelwood fire station is located on County Road C just east of Hazelwood Street, Watermain A 16 inch ductile Iron Pipe watermain exists 18 feet north of the centerline of County Road C from T.H. 61 to Hazelwood Street. The watermain crosses T.H. 61 through a 30 inch steel casing pipeePP north of County Road C and at a right angle to T.H. 61. The watermain crosses under the old Burlington Northern Railroad tracks through a 30 inch steel casing approximately 60 feet northgPPY of the centerline of County Road C. The watermain was installed in 1973. Sanitary Sewer An 8 inch gravity sanitary sewer exists on each side of the old Burlington Railroad tracks between Hazelwood Street and English Street and a 15 inch gravity sewer exists between English Street and T.H. 61. An 8 inch forcemain connects to a 15 inch gravity sanitary sewer at T.H. 61 and crosses under the highway north of County Road C and at a right angle to the highway, A 60 inch gravity interceptor sewer crosses County Road C approximately 350 east of T.H. 61. Drainage The existing drainage facilities consist of drainage ditches and culverts on both sides of the roadway. An existing 24 inch culvert crosses T.H. 61 south of County Road C. The culvert discharges storm water into a low area on the southwest corner of T.H. 61 and County Road C. 2 - EXISTING DEFICIENCIES Roadway The vertical sight distance at the existing bridge over the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad is adequate for approximately 20 mph. The current distance from the intersection of County Road C with the north frontage road to T.H. 61 is not adequate to allow for storage of turning vehicles. There are no facilities for pedestrians. There are no turn lanes at T.H. 61 and turning vehicles from opposite directions on County road C can "lock up" creating delays and safety concerns. Utilities All properties adjacent to County Road C are served by both sanitary sewer and watermain. However, there are two areas of need to be addressed before roadway improvements are done. The first need is sanitary sewer and water services and lateral extension to serve the area between the railroad bridge and Hazelwood Street. The second need is to connect the existing 15 inch gravity sewer to the 60 inch interceptor sewer near T.H. 61. Drainage The drainage deficiencies consist of the lack of adequate storm drainage facilities. Storm water discharge onto private property on the north side of County Road C between Hazelwood Street and the railroad bridge. Storm water runoff from the area between the railroad bridge and English Street discharges onto private property on the north side of County Road C just east of English Street. Flooding occurs on the south side of County Road C at English Street due to the inadequate sized culvert crossing under County Road C and the inadequate capacity of the south ditch west of English Street. Storm water runoff from the north side of County Road C west of English Street discharges onto private property on the north side of County Road C. The existing ditch on the south side of County Road C between English Street and Duluth Street does not have the capacity to handle the existing 3 - drainage. The ditch side slopes in some areas of County Road C are steep enough to create hazardous driving conditions. Bri.dc,e The bridge over the Burlington Northern Railroad is deficient in width and in carrying capacity. It is eligible for Federal Bridge Replacement funding due to its sufficiency gratin of 35.5. A copy of the structure inventory is attached as Figure 15. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS Roadway Ramsey County recommends that the bridge over the abandoned Burlington Northern Railroad be replaced and the roadway be improved to State Aid Standards. The roadway would be widened to 40 feet with concrete curb and gutter. The concrete curb and gutter will help control storm water drainage. A 40 foot wide roadway will allow for recreational use on the shoulder area, emergency parking and stopping /parking for delivery vehicles mail, newspaper and bulk package delivery vehicles.) The vertical alignment would be improved because less vertical clearance is needed at the abandoned railroad. The east frontage road of T.H. 61 north of County Road C will be relocated as shown on Figure 3 and Figure 3A. The relocated frontage road will extend approximately 700 feet to connect to the existing road. The frontage road is proposed to be constructed to a width of 36 feet with concrete curb and gutter. Mn /DOT will pay 100 percent of the cost of the relocated frontage road provided that the City of Maplewood agrees to take over the frontage road when construction is completed. Turn lanes will be provided on County Road C on both approaches to T.H. 61. The turn lanes are designed to provide for opposing left turns in accordance with Mn /DOT desired practice. 4 - Utilities About 600 feet of the watermain near the bridge will need to be lowered to accommodate the proposed lowering of the roadway.Y Eleven sanitary sewer. services are proposed to be installed in the area between the railroad bridge and Hazelwood Street. The sewer services will be installed near existing water services. The sewer and water services will p rovide service to the properties immediately adjacent to County Road C. Five -8 inch sanitary sewer and five -6 inch watermain extensions are proposed to provide service to the undeveloped properties away rom CountY Y Road C between the railroad bridge and Hazelwood Street. In addition, near T.H. 61 the 15 inch gravity sewer is proposed to be connected to the 60 inch interceptor sewer as shown on Figure 3. Drainage The proposed drainage facilities are shown on Figures 3 through 50 The storm sewer is designed based on a 10 year frequency storm. The proposed roadway reconstruction includes the installation of concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. It is proposed to install storm sewer at the intersection of County Road C and Hazelwood Street and discharge into the drainage ditch on the west side of Hazelwood Street. Storm sewer is proposed to be constructed to drain the low point located between the railroad bridge and Hazelwood Street. The storm sewer is located south of the existing right -of -way to reduce the storm sewer depth. Easements are necessary in order to install the storm sewer as proposed. This storm sewer will continue to discharge water into the old Burlington Northern railroad drainage ditches. Storm sewer is proposed to be constructed to pick up runoff from the new bridge and will run westerly to the intersection of County Road C and the new T.H. 61 frontage road. The storm sewer is proposed to be constructed along the new frontage road to about 300 feet south of Kohlman Avenue where the storm sewer will cross under T.H. 61 and discharge into a proposed sediment basin on the west side of the highway. The sediment basin acts as a 5 - pretreatment facility to remove sediment from the storm water. The basin will be designed to accept runoff from the frontage road/Kohlman Avenue area. An existing 24 inch CMP discharges runoff from the frontage road /Kohlman Avenue area to the wetland on the west side of T.H. 610 The proposed storm sewer crossing of T.H. 61 is sized to accept future flows from the frontage road /Kohlman Avenue area. Storm water will pass through the proposed sediment basin to the existing Ramsey County treatment facility and then into Kohlman Lake. Two other storm sewer outlets to Kohiman Lake were considered: 10 The first was to cross T.H. 61 at County Road C and discharge into a sediment basin at the southwest corner of T.H. 61 and County Road C inte- rsection. Runoff from the basin would discharge into Kohlman Lake through an existing culvert crossing County Road C near T.H. 61. Runoff from County Road C and development between T.H. 61 and Keller Parkway would be treated in this basin. This option was rejected since it does not provide pretreatment for runoff from the east side of T.H. 61 north of County Road C. Also the pond needed would be approximately 1.2 acres in size and would limit future development. 2. The second consideration was to cross T.H. 61 at County Road C and discharge into a sediment basin on the northwest corner of T.H. 61 and County Road C intersection. The basin would provide storm water treatment for both the northwest and southwest corners of T.H. 61 and County Road C intersection. This option was rejected since it does not provide pretreatment for runoff for the area east of T.H. 61 north of County Road C. RECOMMENDED BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS Description of Proposed Facility L Ramsey County recommended that the bridge on County Road C be removed and replaced - with a cast -in -place concrete slab bridgeg structure to provide grade separation (see Figure 6, Cast-In- Place-Concrete Slab Bridge) Alternate. The grade of the road at the bridge location will be lowered to improve sight distances. The structures will be of sufficient width to accommodate two 12 foot lanes, two 10 foot shoulders and one 5 foot sidewalk along the south side. The structure would span over a otential lightPg rail transit corridor with additional clearance for a recreational trail underneath. BRIDGE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED Alternate Construction Options - Bridge The option proposed at the location of the existing bridge carrying vehicular traffic over the former Burlington Northern tracks is to replace the bridge with a cast -in -place concrete slab bridge. Other options considered were: 10 Removal of bridge, fill gap with granular material. With the abandonment of the Burlington Northern railway the bridge is.no longer needed to separate vehicles from trains. The gap left by the bridge removal would be filled and a new two lane road would be constructed where the existing bridge was removed. Potential users of a recreational trail would cross County Road C at grade to continue along the trail. This option was rejected because no provisions could be provided for light rail transit through the corridor. Also, pedestrian /vehicular conflicts would increase at the existing bridge site. 2. Other structure types considered. a) Prestressed "I" Girder Bridge Figures 8 and 9. 7 - b) Precast Concrete Double TEE Bridge Figures 10 and 11. c) Precast Concrete Arch (Earth Filled) Figures 12 and 13. These structures were rejected because they all are more costly then the preferred alternate. The p referred alternate would allow the maximum lowering of County Road C at the existing location. The improvement in sight distance would provide a safer vehicular /pedestrian facility. PREFERRED STRUCTURE ALTERNATE The CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SLAB BRIDGE ALTERNATE is recommended for the following reasons. See Figures 6 and 7, Cast-In-Place- Concrete Slab Bridge Alternate, 1) The CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SLAB ALTERNATE and the PRECAST CONCRETE DBL TEE ALTERNATE are the most economical structures for this particular location. However, if adequate soils are present, the PRECAST CONCRETE ARCH would prove to be the most economical using spread foundations. 2) Greater maintenance is required for concrete decked structure versus an earth filled structure. Of all the concrete decked structural alternates considered, the CAST - IN -PLACE CONCRETE SLAB ALTERNATE would require the least cost future maintenance. 3) A safer vehicular /pedestrian facility could be achieved by lowering the existing vertical curve. The CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SLAB ALTERNATE allows a maximum grade cut of 9.77 feet which is the most of any alternate. m ESTIMATED COSTS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Precast Conc. Arch Bridge Alt, STRUCTURES Transit Under Transit /Trail Under 286,500 301,500 ** Precast Conc. Double $254,500 Tee Bridge Alt, Cast -in -Place Conc. $254,500 Slab Bridge Alt, Cast -in -Place Deck $278,500 Prestressed Girder Bridge Alt. 283,500* 284,000* 308, 500* Includes $25,000 for bridge approach panels. Does not include additional sidewalk, curb and gutter and roadway section over structure. However, $50,000 could be savedifsoilsareadequateforspreadfoundations. ESTIMATED COSTS Cost distribution for this project is estimated in accordance with Ramsey County policy and past practice. The approved Ramsey County policy is attached as Appendix A. A summary of that policy follows: Portion of Project Traveled lanes Remainder of roadway Curb & gutter Sidewalk Storm sewer County Participation Ramsey County pays 100$. Ramsey County pays 25$. Ramsey County pays 25$. City pays 100$. Ramsey County pays to the extent that County State Aid funding applies. The estimated costs based on these policies are: Fed . Bridge State Total County City Replace. Funds Traveled lanes 257,000 Remainder of 69, 000 roadway Curb & gutter 66,000 Frontage rd.85,000 Storm sewer 255,000 Storm water sediment facility 80,000 2 Sidewalk 32,000 Bridge Removal 30,000 Lower watermain 19,000 3 Misce utility extensions 29 Bridge Construction 229,000 Total Con- 1 struction Preliminary 115,200 Eng. (10 %) Construction Eng. (8%)92,100 Total $1,359,200 257,000 69,000 16 500 49,500 85,000 142,800 112,200 20,000 60,000 32, 000 30,000 19,000 29,900 183, 000 46, 000 485, 300 352,600 183, 000 131 48 , 500 35,300 18 , 300 13 , 000 38, 800 28,_200 14, 600 10,500 572,600 $416,100 $215,900 $154,600 NOTES: 10 The Minnesota Department of Transportation will Ya for thep entire cost of the frontage road relocation costs if upon completion of construction the City of Maplewood agrees to take over the frontage road. 2. Includes $30,000 for estimated land costs. 3. Estimated cost to lower /replace 600 feet of watermain and appurtenances near railroad bridge. This cost may increase depending upon grade changes along County Road C. 10 - 40 Includes connecting 15" gravity sewer to 60" interceptor and installing eleven sanitary sewer services, five - sewer & water stubs between the railroad bridg e and Hazelwood Avenue. PUBLIC AND AGENCY INVOLVEMENT The City of Maplewood, the Board of Ramsey ount Commissioners,Y Y e s, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation must approve this project. An informational open house was held on March 16 1989 to gain public input. The open house is documented in Appendix B. A public hearing is required by the Board of County Commissioners and will be satisfied b having the City ofYgY Maplewood hold a hearing. The Ramsey County Regional Transit Authority will be consulted regarding bridge design togg accommodate possible future light rail transit. RIGHT -OF -WAY All temporary and permanent right -of -way will be acquired by the City of Maplewood. The existing right -of -way is 60 to 66 feet. A minimum 66 foot wide right -of -way is proposed throughout the study area., ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS No Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) protected wetlands are affected by this project, HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE The Minnesota Historical Society has been asked to review the project for sites of historical, architectural, cultural, archeological or engineering significance. COAST GUARD REQUIREMENTS This project is exempt from Coast Guard rmit requirements.P q 11 - FLOODPLAIN AND SECTION 404 PERMIT This project does not involve placing ill in the 100g year f loodpl ain. i l WATER QUALITY Potential water pollution problems on this project may come primarily from erosion of exposed soil Burin constructionno Because of the. steep slopes in certain areas of the ro ep ct, appropriate erosion control measures will be specified in the contract. This project cannot be accomplished without some disruption to the existing vegetation and there may be some minor soil erosion during the early construction stages. However, construction specifications and special provisions will rovide for temporaryPPY and permanent means to minimize soil erosion. These means shall include, but not be restricted to, the use of sodding and seeding. PARKLAND This project does not involve parkland. TRAFFIC HANDLING DURING CONSTRUCTION Local traffic will be carried on existing County Road C and through traffic will be detoured using Beam Avenue and T.H. 36 during construction. The final construction plans will include a traffic control plan to insure the safe and efficient movement of traffic. TIMELINE This segment of County Road C is included in the Ramsey CountyY bonding program. Construction could begin in 1990 if all approvals are received. The City of Maplewood must agree to the design concepts and cost Participation before Ramsey County will begin detailed design of the project. 12 - PROJECT MANAGER The project manager is Wayne Leonard, P.E., Coordinating Engineer, Ramsey. County Public Works Department, 3377 Rice Street, St. Paul, MN. 13 - Am A AV AdowiFE I ENGINEERS 8 ARCMRECTS I IlAl11NER5 FIGURE 1 F E W. MAPLEWOOD, ISOTA u2 OoLwy ROAD „ . r+o 560 1 N vac r a 2 RD "B" BURKE N ELDRING; AN ti h NV . KFPNJIWSKILLMAN H N W Q 6 0 c= o a 22 Q L W O ll PAL W Y CONS ZA C/R C T ERADO DR LCREST DR tDIAN DR R \ \\ c GENERAL ASSESSMENT AREA ASSESSMENT AREA MAP PROJECT 89 -04 COUNTY ROAD C W TH 61 TO HAZELWOOD ST SCALE N/A MA RKH M POND t c s DE MONT AV 3 XTAN T AV c a G E AV z W RR Y Knuckle Heod L of RECR HARKc' N Subject 5rt Pro g --l e c t . 7E Page of Design 8Y Checked 8Y Dote ©/ FoTT i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD 8 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 t70.4350 EMIMIN4eV ROLL EA 00. /0/SF :.._.3 Cl PA, S• Comma 3-2 - 22 - 33.64)Cod 004 004-1-1311 "C" D0. +5 DO 133 "C 004 1343 II^ 11 00 43 004-1 135 'C 0050 VA CA NT 00.51 13 7 q 11/+ 11 00-5.2 1385 1C 40 -54f 317/ I #I 605.5 1-40 3 , 1:, i 006 3 -29 - 22 - 3`f o) 4111) 00 9 Z45 &ze1 1 1 ---- 000 I51 'I 0 o 13 1495 ,% ,z Q l 1477 z 0015 1-46 t" 0022 Olz 2 Z6 -50 D) /L)/A 23+2 3 2 5 it 00 2;Z - 7 "C Ir 0025 1237 't''f 002 243 ' It 00 2 7 1251 C it f 200 /_ 3 12!55 , 1C " 0031 27-3 00 3;z zo 3 itch C38) f I Subject 6QwaxftlAD ZZ T - S^ Projectr REPJk ..-_ V Poge of Design 8y W IMI Checked 8y Date r9 ® L .L1_J DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1902 EAST COUNTY ROAD 8 MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 770.4350 NAZZ A55£SSMr-NT P• D KRi. a a Fn snn /sF fo g.51 A , aoo/ ood 9 00/0 . aD /i 0012--. 00/4 DO /S 0023 DO 3 5 GbFf 00 50 ppb 3 0065 D z9-z2 -2l - 000z 000(0 OOl1 oz ODO 3 OGbf GAO /7 00/8 9ova 0020 ov 2/ oo2z 00;7--3 0024 2-6o7 0111A z6o 1276 ' G it 4276 'U 270 't 168 "G" 66 , t j, VA CA wr 1200 "C' It ' 11194- , 230 "C1. te, 5 5•COM 17, No ACCass No ACCE65 l21 000 t .5 5+ 88 6) l5 f5 5+ a 061 03) I koz 014 SO t Coo l ' 53+ It s$ BN 99 14c "c it 13 86 1374 1366 '1:" 1360 „G,, 1356 'ew" 13 .2z 3 14 't'' 306 'C „ GRf}tVD I TD7"4-,C -S TOTAL 2so = . 00 4 PROJECT NO. 89 -04 - CO RD C -TH61 TO HZLWD ST D/P NO. QUANTITY CHECK LIST V ' COL. 2) = STORM SEWER - UNIT 2 COL. 3) = STORM SEWER - S. F. SEWER SERV. I CE COL. 5) = WATER SERVICE L. 5 s Dyti fl_ COL 1 -_ -- CDL p 7 1 @- 29- 22 - i:2 -001$ 9 J7- 10 10- 29- 22- Zi=- 001201 11 1 @- 29- 22 - 22- @021 12 13 1 @ - Erg - 22 -0013 10- 29 -22 -2E -0024 is 16 GRAND TOTALS WAGE 2 OF 2 08 -22 -1989 PROJECT No. 89 -04 CO RD C -TH61 TO H2LWD ST 0.210 21.001 PAGE 1 UJ . 1..,0 ._00 0. 010 @ •_2101 .., - - -- - - -. _...._ . _ . 1.21@ 1.00 @ 2101 0.00 D/P N0. 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.210 QUANTITY CHECK LIST 0, OtQt 0 Z1SC -- 1. 0@ 1.00 @ @@ C 1 $TRFT - @• 00 0.00 COL. 2) = STORM SEWER -UNIT 2 COL. 3) = STORM SEWER -S. F._ SEWER-SERVICE 4 COL. 5) = WATER SERVICE 5 a !dfl_COL 1 COLR COL 3 4 COLS 8 03-29 1.00.1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 3 - 9 - 2 3 1y0 1. @ 0. 00 0.00--01.00 -- _ --_ - to 03-29-22-33-0045 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 It @3- 23- 22- 33 -0 @46 1. @0 1.00.0.00 0.00 0.00 13 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 03- 29- 2? -33- @049 1. 00 1.00 0. 0@ 0.00 0.00 15 0-20 17 ,'L7L .:` @ @52 to 1 a @ 1 • @.@ 0• @ @• @ @@ 19 @- 9- 2C- 3'OQJ 1 • @@ 1 • @0 0. 0@ @• 0@ 0. +0 20 . • 03- :3 - 22 - 33- @062 .2.0@ 2.00 .0.0@ 1. @0 1.00 zz 23 03- 29 -22 -34 -0013 2. 00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 03- 29 -22 -34 -0014 2. 00 2.00 0.00 1.0 0.00 _ 25 03- 29 -22 -34 -0015 4.00 4. @0 0.00 3.00 2.00 2` 03- -29 -22 -34 -0022 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27 04 -29 -22 -44- 0022 1 0.00--32234. 04 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29 04- 29 -22 -44 -0024 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0. 31 04- 29 - 22 - 44 - 0026 0.00 0.0 0.00 04- 29 -22 -44 -0027 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.0@ 0.00 33 .4 - - . 020 1. @@ 1. @0,,0.Q. it!Q 0.0 1° 04- 29- 22 - 44- 0029 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 04- 29 -22-44 -0030 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 01.00 04 -29 -22 -44-0031 1.00 0.00 0. pe 0.00 37 04- 29 - 22 -44 -0032 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09- 29- 22 -11- 210101 1.00 1. @0 0.00 0.00 0.00 ss -'J - x _00!09 0.00 210 01. @0 @• @0 ac 013- 29- 22 -11-1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 J1 @9- 29 - -i l -0011 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 az - _Jam-1.00 1.Qt. 00 43 09 - 29 - 22 - @013 1.00 1.00 0.00 0. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45 1 ._2101 0.00 17386.00 0 _00_ 09- 29 - -0035 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 09- 29- -22 -11 -0048 1.010 0.00 10606.00 0.00 0.00 11 -0060 2.00 0.00 24134.00 0.0 0.0 _ 49 09x-29 -22 -11 -0063 1.00 0.00 12000.00 0.00 0.00 09- 29 -22 -11 -0065 1.00 8.00 15000.00 0.00 0.00 S1 10- 29 -22 -21 -0002 15.00 15.00 0. 00 14.00 4.010_ 52 @.210 0.00 54886.00 0.00 0.00 53 1 @- 9- Zar - >r2 -0001 2. 00 2. 00 0.00 1.00 1.00 J - >2 - L2'Q! 40 1.00 1.00 0.0 0 0.0 --- ss 1.00 1.00 0.001 56 10- 29 -22 -22 -0004 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S7 1Q -29 -2- Sri'- Q!f 1. i@ 1. @ 000 0•_010 e•_ PROJECT NO. 89 -04 - CO RD C -TH61 TO HZLWD ST D/P NO. QUANTITY CHECK LIST V ' COL. 2) = STORM SEWER - UNIT 2 COL. 3) = STORM SEWER - S. F. SEWER SERV. I CE COL. 5) = WATER SERVICE L. 5 s Dyti fl_ COL 1 -_ -- CDL p 7 1 @- 29- 22 - i:2 -001$ 9 J7- 10 10- 29- 22- Zi=- 001201 11 1 @- 29- 22 - 22- @021 12 13 1 @ - Erg - 22 -0013 10- 29 -22 -2E -0024 is 16 GRAND TOTALS WAGE 2 OF 2 08 -22 -1989 80.00 74.00 166246.010 21.00 8.010 1.21@ 0. @0 0.210 21.0011.0@ 1.010 1..,0 ._00 0. 010 @ •_2101 .., - - -- - - -. _...._ . _ . 1.21@ 1.00 @ 2101 0.00 0. 001 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.210 i _ 00 0, OtQt 0 0 Z1SC -- 1. 0@ 1.00 @ @@ 0.00 @• 00 0.00 0.00 80.00 74.00 166246.010 21.00 8.010 W .. .., .. 'a .. •, w .. x. V .. r F.. i l. t). - r" _ y .. ,._ r. ... • -r . \ f..w _ .. , fit. .r /.n'S1 ..• ... .. ,. e/a\ .. f .. ,,. c ,,,. ._. S. +r.. ,.c, S .0 3• ?s ,,.. ,.'.t t _ ,' '. ,. . . f.' -ct% .,.. ,]:• u' '7 ? ^ - i` i R/W 33' EXISTING 33' R/W NJN EXISTING R/W PROPOSED 33' + _ 33' 3:1 SLOPE EASEMENT AS NEEDED N AR EXISTING R /W 3:1 WALK SLOPE EASEMENT AS NEEDED TYPICAL SECTIONS COUNTY ROAD C FIGURE 2 60003 Action by Council.. Endorse MEMORANDUM Modif i e d..., Re j eote Date TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit, Lawn Irrigation. Variance and Site Plan Review LOCATION: Highway 61, South of County Road D APPLICANT: Carnival Play Systems, Inc. PROJECT: Swingset Display Site DATE: September 11, 1992 SUMMARY aI 1IR•000 Re nest Carnival Play Systems, Inc. is requesting the City Council approve: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to display and sell swingsets and backyard play equipment outdoors. 2. A variance from the requirement for a lawn irrigation system. 3. The site plan. Project Description The display yard would be 100- by 100 -feet in size. The applicant would install a five - foot -tall chain link fence around the display yard and add two parking spaces next to the existing parking lot. They also would build an 8- by 10 -foot storage shed. This sales operation would begin in March and run through the end of summer. BACKGROUND August 11, 1992: The Community Design Review Board recommended approval of the variance and site plan. August 17, 1992: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP. Criteria for CUP Approval Section 36-442(a) states the City Council must base their approval on the nine standards. I listed these standards in the resolution on page 11. Criteria for Variance Approval Section 367.10, subdivision 6(2) of State law, requires that the City Council make these findings to approve a variance to the zoning code: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration° 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship ", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit There are not any residential neighbors that this business would affect. The proposed swingset display would be compatible with the adjacent business to the south - Backyard Building Systems. Both businesses sell typical residential backyard items. Lawn Irrigation Variance Water is not available to this site, so the applicant cannot install lawn sprinklers. When the City provides water service, the City Council should require that the operator or property owner install a lawn irrigation system. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt the resolution on page 11, granting a conditional use permit for an outdoor display /sales site for swingsets and backyard play equipment. Approval is subject to the following conditions: a. All construction shall follow the site plan, date - stamped July 17, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. b. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. C. The operator shall have a telephone on the site for emergencies. d. If there is not enough parking, the operator or property owner shall provide more paved parking spaces. e. The operator shall not allow parking on Highway 61. f. The operator shall keep the weeds and tall grass cut along the front property line. g. The operator shall provide toilet facilities for employees during business hours. 2. Adopt the resolution on page 12. This resolution approves a variance from the lawn spruiI've g requirement, since: a. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause the applicant undue hardship, because: 1) The City is not providing this property with public water service. 2) Constructing a water main would be extremely expensive. b. The lack of water main is a circumstance unique to the property, not created by the applicant. C. If the operator hand waters the landscaping, the variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Approval is subject to: a. The operator hand watering the landscaping. b. The property owner installing a lawn irrigation system when the City installs a water main to this property. 3. Approve the site plan on page 8 of the August 24 staff report. The applicant shall: a. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project or if the use has not started. b. Add paved parking spaces if a parking shortage develops. The applicant must submit the plan for additional parking to staff for approval. 3 C. d. e. f. g- h. 1. i 0 Install site - security lights. Submit a landscape plan to staff for approval. This plan shall show as much landscaping as Backyard Building Systems planted. Stripe the parking spaces. Submit the building elevations of the storage shed to staff for approval. Mow the tall weeds along the front lot line. Get a conditional use permit for outdoor displays and sales and a variance from the lawn spr top nllitig requirement. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work that is not completed by occupancy. The required escrow amount shall be 150 % of the cost of the ' hed work. The City must receive an agreement, signed by the property owner, that will allow the City to complete any hed work. Install a top rail on the chain link fence. 0 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 10,000 square feet Existing land use: The proposed display /sales site is undeveloped. The overall acreage has a Naegele billboard and a 15,000- square -foot site used for Backyard Building Systems. Property Owner: Clarence Lactorin SURROUNDING LAND USES North and East: Undeveloped property zone M -1 (light manufacturing) South: Backyard Building Systems backyard -shed sales yard West: Highway 61 PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BW (business warehousing) Zoning: M -1 Ordinance requirement: Section 36- 151(b) (4) requires a CUP for the exterior storage, display, sale or distribution of goods or materials.... Section 36 -28(c) (9) requires that the developer of any project install a lawn irrigation system.... OTHER AGENCIES Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /Dot) Mn/Dot requires an entrance permit and aright- turn -lane from Highway 61. Refer to the letter on page 10. to \carniva4.cup (Section 3) mb \mem \carnival Attachments: 1. Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan dated July 17, 1992 4. Swingset example 5. Letter from Mn/Dot dated September 1, 1992 6. Conditional Use Permit Resolution 7. Variance Resolution 5 1 r_ Lox ar do UKiqvm all LAND USE MAP HAZELWOOD 4 N 6 Attachment 1 10 00 OLIN — : _..: :• '• » —. `' 1 iC4UNTY ROAD D WN % t 1 9 ` • 89 i, ,i° Sc. N 4.17 GA Ca g. 30ac: 1 o 4 / AA32fac.. `% p p 15a0 %% 0 G , SoQolo ` , O 7 o' P • 2 3 • 6 o N R. L . S. , TOWia ? h l h--- - --i --- F--- -I , t---.i o o - ,--, o ' - P P r o x. h i 9 hTer- -- 5 - o !` per. i \%STO. OIL CO PIPE L1 322 f --- - - - - -- - - ----- - - - - -- S7 -oo, 7 t Ar I0) C 1 I t / 1 SITE CO l f N I13f BACKYARD t• C s J ,l C Z BUI SYSTEMS Z• 6 C ` v Jf IA In N C If 1 i 1 17q .2p rho - - - - - _W103 -- - • - -- - - -- - -- -- 0 !f 1654.28 -VENBERG TIRE f o / 1 V 6 r 0 A O'Rca - S UApo0EDAE o ,s S c 9 2,5 REG Bs , w 00 f 1972-498$ JtS FT 3 +.9 1 Zt" 14.88 *34'w. 1463.09' - 1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE Q N 7 Attachment 2 IL N 7r l Z rn P Attachment 3 Dimensions: 12'x 28' Deck Height: 5 Feet Approximately Warranty: Ten Year Warranty on Wood Stricture and Slide. Optional: Monkey Bar /Swing Features: Combo (Not Shown) Ten Foot Polyethylene Tube Slide All Construction Heart Redwood Structure Two 4 x 6 Angled Climbing Ladders with Vinyl Coated Steel Rungs Steel Vinyl Coated Swing Beam Brackets Three Pair of Commercial Grade Ductile Iron Swinghangers with Spring Clips Two Belt Swings with Vinyl Coated Chain Trapeze/Rings Combo Big 1 C%bhoi Shown with Swing Be 1Zx Dirnens FIVFW Of" UIW i QUOL Heavy Vinyl Canopy Tire Swing with Vinyl Coated Chains and 3 Point Swivel Pro -Racer Steering Wheel 9 Attachment 4 OF TtP Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 September 1, 1992 Ken Roberts Community Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Ken Roberts: SUBJECT: Site Plan Review Carnival Play Systems East of T.H. 61, South of C.R. D Maplewood, MN C. S. 6222 Repl to Telephone No. Oakdale Office 779 -12 The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Carnival Play Systems site plan and offers the following comments for your consideration. 1. Change of use to the existing access from T.H. 61 will require a new entrance permit from Mn /DOT. Don Fashant of our Permits Office may be contacted at 779 -1141 for the necessary applications and any questions regarding the permit process. 2. As a shared entrance to T.H. 61 with Building Systems, the existing entrance will also require construction of a right turn lane. If you have any questions regarding this review please call. Sincerely, fic U Ruth Ann Sobnosky Senior Transportation Planner 10 Attachment 5 An Equal Opportunity Employer CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Carnival Play Systems, Inc. applied for a conditional use permit to display and sell swingsets and backyard play equipment outdoors. WHEREAS, this permit applies to a part of a property about 600 feet north of 2990 Highway 61. The legal description is: Registered Land Survey No. 262, Tract C. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on 199_. They recommended that - the City Council this permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 199_. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. II Attachment 6 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions. 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped July 17, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 3. The operator shall have a telephone on the site for emergencies. 4. If there is not enough parking, the operator or property owner shall provide more paved parking spaces. 5. The operator shall not allow parking on Highway 61. 6. The operator shall keep the weeds and tall grass cut along the front property line. 7. The operator shall provide toilet facilities for employees during business hours. Adopted Carni.cup jl - ( mb \mem \carnival) 1990 _ 12 VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Carnival Play Systems, Inc. applied for a.variance from the zoning ordinance for a part of a property that is about 600 feet north of 2990 Highway 61. The legal description is: Registered Land Survey No. 262, Tract C WHEREAS , Section 3 6 -2 8 ( (c) (9) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all commercial development. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to not install such a system. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. This variance was reviewed by the Community Design Review Board August 11, 1992. They recommended that the City Council the variance. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause the applicant undue hardship, because: a. The City is not providing this property with public water service. b. Constructing a water main would be extremely expensive. 2. The lack of water main is a circumstance unique to the property, not created by the applicant. 3. If the operator hand waters the landscaping, the variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Approval is subject to: a. The operator hand watering the landscaping. b. The property owner installing a lawn irrigation system when the City installs a water main to this property. Adopted on 199 . mb /mem / carnival 13 Attachment 7 Planning Commission Minutes of 8 -17 -92 4- the de eloper does any site grading or the City approve a final plat. All trees to be saved shall be clearly m rked on site before any grading is done. 4) Show draina and utility e:/see is along all property lines. These easements shaten feet wide along the front and ear property and five feet wide along the side roperty lin 5) Change the proper lines on Lots 2, 3 and 4. This Ichangeshallbesohe operty lines are perpendicular to Laurie Road and dal to the Ide Street cul -de -sac. 6) Change the property i e between Lots 20 and 21. This change shall be so he roperty line is radial to the cul -de -sac. 7) Change the name of Laurie venue to Laurie Road. 8) Remove the h se and two ga ges on Lots 1 and 2. 9) Remove the house and garage on\ Lots 17 and 19. 10) Change t aeright -of -way at the t nsition point with the cul de -sacs to meet City stan ards. If the dev loper decides to final plat p rt of the prelimina y plat, the Director of Communi y Development may waive an conditions that do not apply to he final plat. Commis loner Pearson seconded Ayes - -All nspach, Anitzberge Fischer, fs Gerke, Pear on, Rossbach, Sigmundik The motion passed. NEW BUSINESS a. Conditional Use Permit: Highway 61 (Carnival Play Systems) Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Tom Corcoran, representing Carnival Play Systems, said he was in agreement with the recommended conditions of the staff report. Mr. Corcoran said their equipment would be moved off -site and stored for the winter months. Commissioner Allenspach moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which grants a conditional use permit to display and sell children's play equipment outdoors. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Planning Commission Minutes of 8 -17 -92 b. 5- 1) All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped July 17, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2) The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 3) The operator shall have a telephone on the site for emergencies. 4) If there is not enough parking, the operator or property owner shall provide more paved parking spaces. 5) The operator shall not allow parking on Highway 61. 6) The operator shall keep the weeds and tall grass cut along the front property line. 7) The operator shall provide toilet facilities for employees during business hours. Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes -- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Fischer, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik The motion passed. Singles and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance Secreta Olson presented the staff re ort and discussed with the ommission the proposed cha ges to this ordinance. Commissione Pearson moved the P nning Commission recommend approval of a ordinance chan ng the setback requirements for R -1 (sing dwelling),, R (residential estate) , R -1S small-lot sin e dwelling and R -2 (double dwelling) , including the ma'or chan s proposed in the August 10 staff report and the a ition wording in the "Front line of the dwelling" section. Commissioner Anitz}zTe3.ccrer The motion- pXssed. C-9 Metro 2 01 5( Review Ayes -- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Fischer, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik Staff resented the Metro 2015 port from the Metropolitan Coun 1. The Commission reviewe the document and made the fo owing comments: MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AUGUST il 1992 10 CALL ORDER Chairpe son Moe called the meeting to or 2. ROLL CALL / Donald Moe Present: Marvin Ericks Present Michael Holder Pr/entMarieRobinsonPr Bruce Thompson Pr Scott Wasiluk Ab 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. July 28, 1992 at 7 p.m. Boardmember Ro inson ved approval of the minutes of July 28, 1992, as ubmitted. Boardmembe Erickson se co ed Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson 4. APPROVAL OF/ AGENDA Boardme*er Erickson moved approval of die agenda as submitted. BoardmAmber Holder seconded Ayes -- Mom- -, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Lawn Sprinkling Variance and Design Review - Carnival Play Systems, Inc., Highway 61 Torn Corcoran and Tom Klein, the applicants, were present. They said they are planning to construct a five -foot chain - link fence which will have a top rail on it. Since the site does not have water available, they said they will carry water onto the site to maintain the required landscaping. Boardmember Thompson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: 1) Approval of the site plan shown in the August 5 staff report. The applicant shall: a) Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project or if the use has not started. Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 8 -11 -92 b) Add paved parking spaces if a parking shortage develops. The applicant must submit the plan for additional parking to staff for approval. c) Install site - security lights. d) Submit a landscape plan to staff for approval. This plan shall show as much landscaping as Backyard Building Systems planted. e) Stripe the parking spaces. f) Submit the building elevations of the storage shed to staff for approval. g) Mow the tall weeds along the front lot line. h) Get a conditional use permit for outdoor displays and sales and a variance from the lawn sprinkling requirement. i) Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work that is not completed by occupancy. The required escrow amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The City must receive an agreement, signed by the property owner, that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. 2) Adoption of the resolution which approves a variance from the lawn sprinkling requirement, since: a) Strict enforcement of the code would cause the applicant undue hardship, because: 1) The City is not providing this property with public water service. 2) Constructing a water main would be extremely expensive. b) The lack of water main is a circumstance unique to the property, not created by the applicant. c) If the operator hand waters the landscaping, the variance would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Approval is sub* ect to: a) The operator hand watering the landscaping. Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 8 -11 -92 b) The property owner installing a lawn irrigation system when the City installs a water main to this property, Boardmember Erickson seconded Boardmember Robinson moved the motion be amended to require a top rail if a fence is constructed. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes - - Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson The amended motion was then voted as follows: Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson 7. VISITOR ESENTATION5 There were n visitor presentations. 80 BOARD PRESENTAT ONS a. Boardmember ickson reported on the August, 10 City Council meeting. 9. STAFF PRESENTATIONS a. Board Member Volun for the August 24 Council Meeting: Mike Holder b. Staff reminded a Boa of the Commissioners Dinner on Saturday, Sep mber 26 a the Best Western Maplewood Inn. Invitations ill be maile c. Staff pre,ented the tentative CDRB agenda for the August 25 meeting \ 10. ADJOURNME Meetin adjourned at 7:35 p.m. G 4MW Y MEMORANDUM SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Thone Builders and Development, Inc. is asking that the City Council approve the moving of a house and one -car garage. The house and garage are at 2847 white Bear Avenue. The applicant would like to move them to a lot on County Road C west of 2621 Ariel Street. The house is a 1 -1/2 story expansion bungalow sided with white stucco. There is a second -story dormer on the back of the roof with horizontal -lap siding. Refer to the photos on page 7. CODE REQUIREMENTS Section 9 -64 requires the following findings to approve a building relocation request: 1. The proposed building is compatible with those in the neighborhood it would be moved to. A determination of compatibility may be based on comparing the structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construction to the average home in the neighborhood to which the house is to be moved and the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. That all City Code requirements can be met. 3. That water runoff from the site will not cause an adverse effect on surrounding properties. 4. Public streets can be protected from damage. DISCUSSION This house is compatible with the surrounding homes. Also, moving this house would remove an eyesore from White Bear Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Approve the relocation of the house at 2847 White Bear Avenue to the lot west of 2621 Ariel Street, subject to Thone Builders and Development, Inc. doing the following: Action by Council TO:City Manager FROM:Thomas Ekstrand ' Associate Planner eEndo SUBJECT. ,House Moving ocli i e - LOCATION:County Road C East of white Bear Avenue Bed ecte APPLICANT Thone Builders and Development Inc.date DATE:August 13, 1992 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Thone Builders and Development, Inc. is asking that the City Council approve the moving of a house and one -car garage. The house and garage are at 2847 white Bear Avenue. The applicant would like to move them to a lot on County Road C west of 2621 Ariel Street. The house is a 1 -1/2 story expansion bungalow sided with white stucco. There is a second -story dormer on the back of the roof with horizontal -lap siding. Refer to the photos on page 7. CODE REQUIREMENTS Section 9 -64 requires the following findings to approve a building relocation request: 1. The proposed building is compatible with those in the neighborhood it would be moved to. A determination of compatibility may be based on comparing the structure's exterior siding, height, mass, age and style of construction to the average home in the neighborhood to which the house is to be moved and the health, safety and welfare of the community. 2. That all City Code requirements can be met. 3. That water runoff from the site will not cause an adverse effect on surrounding properties. 4. Public streets can be protected from damage. DISCUSSION This house is compatible with the surrounding homes. Also, moving this house would remove an eyesore from White Bear Avenue. RECOMMENDATION Approve the relocation of the house at 2847 White Bear Avenue to the lot west of 2621 Ariel Street, subject to Thone Builders and Development, Inc. doing the following: 1. Submit an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow for 1 -1/2 times the estimated cost of completing the construction. The applicant shall complete the work wig 90 days of the City issuing the permit. The construction shall meet the Building Code requirements. (Code requirement) 2. Sign an agreement to convey title. This agreement shall give the City the right to take possession of the house and property if the required work is not completed within 90 days after the City issues the mowing permit. This agreement would allow the City the right to complete the construction required by Code or demolish and remove the structure. The City Attorney shall draft this agreement. 3. After the move, regrade and sod the disturbed parts of 2847 White Bear Avenue. Remove the fence from 2847 white Bear Avenue. 4. Verify the lot lines with survey pins. S. Repaint all siding and trim. 64 Move the house and garage between the hours of 3 and b a.m 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS I surveyed the 14 property owners within 350 feet of this site. Two owners replied from one of the 11 properties. They had no comment. REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 21,178 square feet Existing land use: Undeveloped Owner: Nancy J. Gaston SURROUNDING LAND USES North: County Road C. Across County Road C is a single dwelling and the Harmony School parking lot. South: The back yard of 2607 Ariel Street. West: Undeveloped land owned by Ramsey County. The City shows this land as OS open space) on the land use plan. East: Two single dwellings. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: RL (low - density residential) Zoning: R -1 (single- dwelling residential) to \housemov.mem (Section 11) mb \mem \housemov Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. House Photos 3 FA pa WH/ TE BEAR LAKE a @0) r ' F :• .•.'.•7 :• .........t ; L {.. .............................. tl 11 N GAI a o JWW JW 4 a WOODLYNN AV d 2 W W FURI9SS o , LY01 A c CTFS A n W 1.- pP 9 (zn W o Z a ST = J W pQ` x P/oycre pN (3 PBEAo W N O Pk ST is W VDD 3 Maple-W wood Hts Z x MAPLE VIEW AV <: 3 U c = %N)11 /// U PO 2) PRIVATE STREET Q ` N (I&SSAB/ AV) V c AV Z North w Y KO H LMAN . a Hazelwood NORTH* SA /N T U) 2 Pk Zcr W o CO > 23r' • A 11C11 U) - Z T29N, R W H 1 a W `z 3 2 N EDG E HILL RD 101axt W Harvest W Pk DEMONT AV m C .... v ? BR00 AV con a Z ELE Fes, ....:. SEXTANT W Four Pv AV XTAN T AV Seasons Pk W LOCATION MAP Q N 4 Attachment 1 Q c a GERVAIS GEMIS GERVA %b AV C.) GRANDAEW AV Z CT Q at co VIKING W Dft TLE ASV 36 H RREN A Knuck le Heod LOke PE AV COPE G AV A Q N a. v LAURIE a l Q R Y W Z dc ir v L ti RIE RD Q SAND- HURST Sheri Z AV Z Z 25 d o Y CO RD 8''N o Cr. BU RKE o Robinhood AV G 1 0 oELDRIDGAV3 At S n BEL i AV N OfyHo// 94*4rION -C ILLMAN AV RRIS` Z LOCATION MAP Q N 4 Attachment 1 6 n In 0 N, 19 i N 4 INDEPENDENT H DIST.a22 9) 030 64 HARIIGNY SCHOOL mss. t + OD a 1 h I `D 30 0so , az Joe 9s 4m, - m qmmmmwmmmm 4mmmmmmwm 7200'100 lod- to 06 CLID CONY ROAD C t 9 • s I to .. PROPOSED ROME SITE O l3 0 0, 1954 04 C iryt(,3# 21,, 1 A 14 o (4 8) LARRY S LIVE BAIT 611 a Cr5 ° ' '• 17 1 I9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 E4 39 14 t .32aw. 090 a i c -jos o z 2 607 ( 4)33 i,c .IAJS K AV E.0 ao E-4 s 33 - zap a `C-38 , o rZ 1 t32oc. • IGo . 2.7 7 0¢ 04 31) 2S 14 13 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 ~ (s) 455 2599 BACM(AN 8 IILL 7 f vtsv 51) _ 17 l )19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 o 4A I 3 T 19 - (7) 0 EDGEHILL IN w r-% L.W s) In Z, r 3` ` Z 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 os 5 4 3 2 1 Doc. 2062543 . 1 , t o tl. 23 24 627 12930 W 16 17 18 19 2021 2 25 26 27 28 29 30 U 40 r VAC. _ •., ire- ' ti i•s; VACA110. AV J - 0 4 ( G 3oi, 3 op PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 Attachment 2 I 8.52 ac.toE *' ( 40 b 020 0 ? 3 r .43 ac a 4 N C..U• Iry o c r _ +•.. t A I- m mom -",A f S.00 • 16 1fTtOSCI i CP o46 0r , a SA AA JTl i • Srf • fik _ N I .- -111. 0 V07 154- T / I4 _ b R`t' t.. . d F Cpl .b. F -14-- p • cr•a F IV"1 c- 1 -1 3 SITE PLAN 6 Attachwa- nt 3 4 N i - to - •_ :` • Tv& Ap It r r i IL - a•fR` . ems.:. -,ur . ,a , ,v ;., r - -• 16 I` r i F •'0...n_ .. it.a/ mow -•l: + rK- i - to - •_ :` • Tv& Ap It r r i IL - a•fR` . ems.:. -,ur . ,a , ,v ;., r - -• 16 Community Design Review Board Minutes of 8 -25 -92 6, DESIGN REVIEW 2- a. House Moving - Thone Builders, County Road C The applicant was not present at the meeting. Staff gave a brief explanation of this request. The Board discussed the stucco exterior of the house and the present zoning of the White Bear Avenue property. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the relocation of the house at 2847 White Bear Avenue to the lot west of 2621 Ariel Street, subject to Thone Builders and Development, Inc. doing the following: 1) Submit an irrevocable letter of credit or cash escrow for 1 1/2 times the estimated cost of completing the construction. The applicant shall complete the work within 90 days of the City issuing the permit. The construction shall meet the building code requirements. 2) Sign an agreement to convey title. This agreement shall give the City the right to take possession of the house and property if the required work is not completed within 90 days after the City issues the moving permit. This agreement would allow the City the right to complete the construction required by code or demolish and remove the structure. The City Attorney shall draft this agreement. 3) After the move, regrade and sod the disturbed parts of 2847 White Bear Avenue. Remove the fence from 2847 White Bear Avenue. 4) Verify the lot lines with survey pins. S) Repaint all siding and trim. 6) Move the house and garage between the hours of 3 and 6 a.m. Boardmember Thompson seconded Boardmember Erickson moved to amend the motion, adding condition seven as follows: 7) Any damaged stucco shall be repaired before a certificate of occupancy is issued. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson Community Design Review Board Minutes of 8 -25 -92 3- The amended motion was voted on as follows: Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson b. Site Plan Re 'sion and Conditional Use Permit - Corporate Property Investors, Maplewood N11 James Selanec wa present representing Corporate Property Inv stors. He explained their req st to restripe the lot with nine- foot -wide falls at a 75- degree angle. Mr. S ec discussed with the Board the rent angular designs considered for parking all Mr. Selanec said any futuref xpansion of the Mall would be seriously affect d if the City requires ten -foot- de stalls for a future expansion instead of the ' ting nine- foot -wide stalls. Gary Jackson, General Manag r of the Mall, said th manager of the Rosedale shopping mall has not had any omplaints on the unilar restriping design of that parking lot. Boardmember Thompson moved th& Xoard recommend: 1) Approval of the use of nine -fooe parking spaces at a 75- degree angle for the Maplewood Mall, because a) The Mall is currently s*ged \vith nine- foot -wide stalls. b) There is not enough oom for al ditional parking, without building a parking ramp. Approval is subject to e following condi 'on: The City may require that the Mall restripe the' parking to ten -foot- 'de stalls when the Mall proposes to build p king ramps. 2) Approval of the ' e plan that the City has st ed August 3, 1992 for the Penns additio and Mall parking lot. Approv is subject to the applicant doing the foll g: a) Rep t this review after two years if the City as not issued a b , g permit for this project. b) Restore and sod the boulevard along Southlawn Drive if damaged by the construction. c) Provide reflectorized stop signs at all exits and ahandicap- parking sign for each handicap- parking space. TO: City Manager .Acts ®n by Council :jFROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Revision and Design Review Endorsed--......,.LOCATION: 2696-2730 Hazelwood Avenue Modified, PROJECT: First Evangelical Free Church R.e j e c t e DATE: September 23, 1992 Date INTRODUCTION 1. The conditional use permit for the planned unit development at 2696-2730 Hazelwood Avenue is due for review. This PUD is for a church, day care center and senior citizen housing project. The City staff is proposing several changes to update the permit conditions. 2. First Evangelical Free Church is asking that the City approve plans for: a. A worship center addition that consists of a 580 -seat sanctuary and narthex. This addition would have an exterior of brick, break -off block and metal panels. There would be a brick and metal -panel steeple on the south side. b. A multi- purpose addition on the east side of the existing building.. This addition would have an exterior of painted, break -off block. The church would use it for a gymnasium and other purposes. C. A drive and parking for the day -care center to drop off and pick up children. The drive I would add two new driveways onto Hazelwood Avenue. The church would move the existing playground and storage shed toward the north lot line. d. Relocated parking. The worship center will replace most of the parking that is in front of the building. The church would expand their parking lot onto the southeast corner of the site. There will be a net increase in parking spaces from 142 spaces now to 202 spaces on the site plan. There would be a new drive from the parking lot to Hazelwood Avenue. The church would move the existing parking lot so it is twenty feet from the south lot line. e. New landscaping. To screen the homes to the south, the church would add landscaping and berming along the south lot line, between the trail and the parking lot. BACKGROUND August 13, 1990: The City Council revised the conditional use permit for the planned unit development at 2696 -2730 Hazelwood Avenue. This revision was to allow a church and day care center at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. This PUD also includes senior citizen housing at 2730 Hazelwood Avenue (Hazel Ridge). (See the map on page 7.) August 12, 1991: The Council reviewed the CUP and decided to review this permit again when the Church had plans for their new sanctuary. DISCUSSION Sprinklers City Code requires that the church install an in- ground sprinkler system. The Church will install this system in the area of the new construction and along the south property line. They want to defer construction of a sprinkler system on the north half of the site. This is reasonable since they plan on future parking on the northeast corner of the site. Landscaping Along the South Properly Line The church is proposing an attractive building and landscaping. More landscaping or berming is needed along the south end of the parking lot to screen the rear yards of the two lots at the end of Germain Court. This is a code requirement. The other abutting property owner on Hazelwood Avenue has an existing screening fence. This owner, however, is requesting more landscaping as well. The church proposes to work out the screening needs with the three neighbors south of the proposed parking lot. The church would then submit a revised landscape plan for review. (Refer to the architect's letter on page 17.) The problem, however, is that Code specifically requires a six- foot -tall, 80% opaque screen. Even if the neighbors agree to less screening, the applicant must still apply for a variance. On-Street Parking Ban Moving parking from the front of the building to the back of the site will make street parking more attractive than using the parking lot. The police chief recommends that the City post the east side of Hazelwood Avenue for no parking. With three new curb cuts proposed, for a total of five, the street should be kept clear of parked cars. This will improve visibility for cars leaving the driveways. The City has already posted the east side, from County Road C to the Church property, and the west side for no parking. 2 The Church's architect is proposing that the City limit no parking to the area that is 30 feet to the left and ten. feet to the right of each driveway exit. (Refer to the architect's letter on page 17.) RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the resolution on page 12. This resolution changes the conditions of the conditional use permit at 2696 -2730 Hazelwood Avenue as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) a. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped Auust 25 1992. ' s e The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes. i few b. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the Citv Council approves this revised permit or it shall become null and void. The Council Maygrant up to one one -Year extension of the permit. V • r r 16 r • U r • . • i r I W T aT A r r MY • A !W / r • r / r r r • r • • • r • N I r r r I I. r • • I w . .. • A . a t • • 5 r • • r r r r • • A r I..I .• I •• •. 0 • 1 W Q a .r 0r W r 20 Approve the plans for the First Evangelical Free Church at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. The City has stamped these plans August 25, 1992. The applicant shall do the following: a. Direct or screen lighting so it is not directly visible from any residential area or public street. Lighting shall not exceed one foot - candle at a residential property line. (Code requirement) b. Repeat this review in two years if the * has not issued a building permit for this project. C. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits, a handicap parking sign for each handicap - parking space and an address on the building. 3 I Screen all roof- mounted equipment that will be visible from streets or adjacent property. Submit screening plans to the Design Review Board for approval. (Code requirement) e. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure as required by City Code. The enclosure must match the building color. Submit plans for the enclosure to staff for approval. f. Submit a grading, ge, utility and erosion control plan to the City Engineer for approval. g. Install an in -ground sprinkler system for the landscaped areas, except the open area at the northeast corner of the site. (Code requirement) h. Submit the plans for all Phase II development to the Design Review Board for approval. i. Submit a revised screening plan for the south lot line to staff for approval. The plan must show enough planting and berming to provide an 80% screen that is at least six feet tall. This screening is required for the - rear yards of the two_ homes at the end. of Germain. Court.. (Code requirement) j. Provide at least a 20 -foot setback between the playground and equipment storage shed and the north lot line. (Code requirement) k Construct concrete curbing around the existing and proposed parking lot and drives. (Code requirement) 1. Paint the doors on the north end of the building. (Code requirement) M. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work that is not completed by occupancy. The required escrow amount shall be 150% of the cost of the ' h .d work. First Evangelical Free Church shall give staff an agreement that allows the City to complete any wished work. 3. Make the east side of Hazelwood Avenue, from County Road C to Beam Avenue, a no parking zone. Direct the Public Works Department to put u thePPP appropriate signs. 4 kd \mem \firstev go \b- 3:firstev.mem (3) Attachments: 1. Location Map 20 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Architectural Perspective 5. Letter from D. Batty and Associates dated August 25, 1992 6. Resolution 7. CDRB Minutes 8. Architect's letter dated September 18, 1992 9. Plans stamped August 25, 1992 (separate attachment) 5 VADNA /S HEIGH TS 19 Co R o " o of E Q ...........Q :........................ Z 0 yygP GP sT. WHI T. , a N IL m W Q CO RD " D" N O E-W N ST !/0 ac S Q W LYDIA c i BEAM j 4V ...... Y = MOP /s - 4 _ wood Hts 8 g RADATZ er ui Arir Ix loh /mon Loke U•' KOHLMAN d AV ortA Y KONLMAN AV Ho'a1 wood } Pk R0 NC U) 3 Cr cc =W o CO > RD 23 1,• N FMN w cry Z T29N,R22W PX (I), W a 3 2llCLWJ .....a.... pJ v r Z Ov` T W : - W) EDG EHILL RD i 3 i Harvest N J N AV l._ - a i I CON NOR Pk OE MONT AV ~ om NJ KS 3o u N 9 AV • CT ? EM /L M4•. SEXTANT h Four PJ ?'K ... AV4 _ 0 XTAN T AV ASeasonsOXPk . GERMS AV } a GERVAISJ GERVL GERVAIS AV KwY Cr GRANOVIEW AV z CT Q W m VIKING OR Y 3 H RREN AV N COPE CT COPE AV Knuckle Head Lok$ P oPS t>.E AY...:_.1 cn CO AV B LARK AV Cnf - H 4 - CO o R0 "8•• u LAURIE ? ° R W - Q y x W u LAU RIE RD Ro = woodPltZccLELANDZJ2 ZHURSTWZAV = _ Z a JUNCTION ST ° c o Y C > R N Z5 oo D 8 E AV ° Q BURK c Rbb;nAood AV LAC 1) CRAM 8t'_'RS ST - ( I) o ELDRIDG AV 38E .... - :1 N LOCATION MAP 6'Attachment I 4 N i r 023 .Go t. oo 7) n VILLAGE OF MAPL PONONG AREA 79 ' f;99 2' Dec l91'iSv3 1- 13 - '12 ri 2 2767 409. 2759 0 y AI - 0 - - - - - 31. 71' _ Z 51 .7 - 20. 9040 o r.•• 3 33 ..'• 31 2747 00 3 s,, 5.3. 2730 755. 2737 :•::: •.• 300 F V%XXIto, ,- ... . . . . . . ... . ...... . . ***.** ..... r ... . .... .... 2731 .. . . . . .. too 0551 02 " 727 • ... ... ....... .. ....... . .•. , 39. 8a • 2 ...... .. ,.....,.o :.....:........ ........... ... oM000000 ...... .................. .......................... o ............... ::......... .:•.........................•. g 8. 4' ............. .... 57 7 too .. . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . ... ...... , . .. . ... .. .. .:. ......... . . , .0. J ........... .... ............................ to to. .... ............................. t .........................65 ate. •. .........2 • ..........................w ............... .......... ......... 2707 r' o N ........ 0. ................. .. ........ .. ........N Q ..... .. ........ a so = .... ... .......................... 0 to . ......................... . . Iso go zI' ............................... totoo rto too to N W) too 2673' .......... ..................... ..........................:N ............................... •...........................i ................K r. ......•..•.•.• ................2.0) ... :.,. ... .............. .......... b T • .1 T I 681 0 2680 .6 7 9 2 A S 7 8 6 2672 0 (18)10 & K L0 0• 0 co Z _ 7.3 40 ti 7 2669 Q1 I , 2666 Q • '7G •c , O 30 1 1 =.r 2661 3(11 u 6 67-13 7S 2645 _ ) c) °; _ Go10)ow !91 13 cl o0ot' ISO ' - 265 _3 5 . 99 tl $5. 1 75.01 CO. RD. C -- - , A PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP R -1 = Single Family Residential C3 Planned Unit Development R -2 = Double Dwelling F =Farm Residential Church Project 4 N 7 Attachment 2 PROPOSED CURB- CUT` r'' \ PROPOSED, CURB CUT t 1 1 EXISTING CURB —'- »--CURB CUT P 1 8 `P it V a 1 1 PROPOS CURB CUT . EXISTING CURS CUT i /,,. • . rJ 01 1 00 III f 1 till Ot w l ti 1 Dili `Ali 1 X1111 I i i r 1 i l 11111 i 11 1 111,hl I I I 111 III i Jill rr:t ; r•T • L Jill 1'11 tt If 1 SITE PLAN 8 Attachment 3 i I[: N PROPOSED PHASE II CONBTRQCTI0N PROPOSED NEW CONSTRIICTIOIi vn tl em;% iV 1 ' 1 F 41 m FIRST EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH MAPLEWOOD MN -• DENNIS BATTY & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTSMINNEAPOU=. MN DENIMS BATTY & ASSOCIATES nic- ARCHITECTS 6860 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55430 [612] 560 -6814 August 25, 1992 Geoff Olson, Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 E County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: First Evangelical Free Church 2696 Hazelwood Street Dear Mr. Olson, Enclosed find the application for Community Design Board to review the referenced project. Also find ten sets of plans including: Site and Landscape Plan Grading and Utility Plan Worship Center Exterior Elevation Activity Building Exterior Elevations Letter and calculations regarding site run off quantities This site plan identifies the current project and Phase II pro - posed work. As reviewed in a preliminary meeting with Tom Ecostrand we are not changing the land use and thus have not applied for revision to Pud. The site and landscape plan identifies the proposed construction for this project. The worship center addition on the west side of the existing building would include 580 seats in a sanctuary and a narthex which would open to the existing classroom building. The activity center in the east will be sized to acco- modate basketball, volleyball, and other activities with a separate entrance and also an opening to the existing classroom building. Parking on the site accomodate s the church activities, The parking on the south portion of the property accomodates 203 cars, With sanctuary seating of 580 this gives a ratio of 1:2.8, parking : sanctuary seating. Additionally, there are eleven spaces shown on the north portion of the site seven in an existing paved area and four spaces to the north. The four spaces with an extended driving area are proposed to accomodate the nursery school to allow parents to pull off of Hazelwood to walk their children into the building or just drop them off. This would be designated one way. 10 Attachment 5 City of Maplewood August 25, 1992 Page 2 The building elevations identify of the additions. The exterior finishes and colors which match meter ials and colors which will our proposed exterior treatment materials will incorporate the existing building as well as blend with the existing building* With this application we request the Design Review Boards con - sideration and comments on this project We have included con- sideration of the City of Maplewood, the needs and requirements of First Evangelical Free Church., and the site and landscaping regulations included in filing requirements . Please schedule this review as soon as possible, Please call with any questions you may have regarding the project. Thank you. Sincerel , Phil nson Dennis Batty & Assoicates PJ /mjb 11 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood approved a conditional use permit for a planned unit development for a church, . day care facility and senior housing project. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2696 -2730 Hazelwood Avenue. The legal description is: 1. PLAT 03031 SECTION 3 TOWN 29 RANGE 22. PART OF N 800 FT OF S 1310 FT OF W 578 FT OF SE 1/4 DESC AS BEG ON EL THEREOF 458.6 FT N OF SE COR THEREOF TH N ON SD EL 341.4 FT TH N 88 DEG 55 MIN OZ SEC W 578 FT TH S 133 FT TH S 88 DEG 55 MIN 02 SEC E 33 FT TH S 70 DEG 45 MIN 30 SEC E 208.85 FT TH S 40 DEG E 97.65 FT TH S 69.67 FT TH S 88 DEG 55 MIN 02 SEC E 285 FT TO BEG (SUBJ TO HAZELWOOD AVE) IN SEC 3 TN 29 RN 220 2. PLAT 03031 SECTION 3 TOWN 29 RANGE 22. PART OF N 800 FT OF S 1310 FT OF W 578 FT OF SE 1/4 DESC AS BEG ON EL THEREOF 458.6 FT N OF SE COR THEREOF TH S ON SD EL 458.6 FT TH N 88 DEG 55 MIN 02 SEC W 578 FT TH N 667 FT TH S 88 DEG 55 MIN 02 SEC E 33 FT TH S 70 DEG 45 MIN 30 SEC E 208.85 FT TH S 40 DEG E 97.65 FT TH S 69.67 FT TH S 88 DEG 55 MIN 02 SEC E 285 FT TO BEG (SUBJ TO HAZELWOOD AVE & ESMT) IN SEC 3 TN 29 RN 220 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The City Council approved this permit initially on August 13, 19900 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council revise the above - described conditional use permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the. City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or proper y , because ofP 12 Attachment 6 excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use, would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire rainarotection, drainage structures, water andPg sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would mamize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped August 25, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes.. 20 The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the City Council approves this permit or it shall become null and void. The council may grant up to one one -year extension of the permit. Adopted 21992. kd/mem\firstev 13 Community Design Review Board Minutes of 9 -8 -92 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Building Addition -First Evangelical Free Church, 2696 -2730 Hazelwood Avenue Phillip Johnson, representing Dennis Batty &Associates, said this is proposed to be a one -story addition on the east side of the existing building, Mr. Johnson said the drive for the day -care center is proposed as a one -way drive. Mr. Johnson said the details of the roof - mounted screening will be provided at a later date. He also requested that the requirement for a sprinkler system for the addition area be delayed and phased in at a later time. Mr. Johnson said he would like to meet with the neighbors before submitting a revised screening plan. Mr. Johnson said he is not in agreement with Maplewood Public. Safety's request for no- parking on the east side of Hazelwood Street. He said this area is used by parents for parking when dropping off their children at the day -care center. Mr. Johnson said they are proposing to maintain the buff - colored brick and bronze - colored aluminum trim and window framing which is present on the exterior of the existing building. Boardmember Holder moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: 1) Approval of the resolution which changes the conditions of the conditional use permit at 2696 -2730 Hazelwood Avenue as follows: a) All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped August 25, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes. b) The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the City Council approves this revised permit or it shall become null and void. The Council may grant up to one one -year extension of the permit. 2) Approval of the plans for the First Evangelical Free Church at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. The City has stamped these plans August 25, 1991 The applicant shall do the following: a) Direct or screen lighting so it is not directly visible from any residential area or public street. Lighting shall not exceed one foot- candle at a residential property line. (Code requirement) b) Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 14 Attachment 7 Community Design Review Board Minutes of 9 -8 -92 c) Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits, ahandicap- parking sign for each handicap - parking space and an address on the building. d) Screen all roof - mounted equipment that will be visible from streets or adjacent property. Submit screening plans to the Design Review Board for approval. (Code requirement) e) Construct, a trash dumpster enclosure as required by City code. The enclosure must match the building color. Submit plans for the enclosure to staff for approval. M Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the City Engineer for approval. g) Install an in- ground sprinkler system for the landscaped areas, except the open area at the northeast comer of the site. (Code requirement) h) Submit the plans for all Phase II development to the Design Review Board for approval. i) Submit a revised screening plan for the south lot line to staff for approval. The plan must show enough planting and bernung to provide an 80% screen that is at least six feet tall. This screening is required for the rear yards of the two homes at the end of Germain Court. (Code requirement) j) Provide at least a 20 -foot setback between the playground and equipment storage shed and the north lot line. (Code requirement) k) Construct concrete curbing around the existing and proposed parking lot and drives. (Code requirement) 1) Paint the doors on the north end of the building. (Code requirement) m) Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit or negotiate an agreement with the City for any required work that is not completed by occupancy. The required escrow amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. First Evangelical Free Church shall give staff an agreement that allows the City to complete any unfinished work. 15 Community Design Review Board Minutes of 9 -8 -92 3) Make the east side of Hazelwood Avenue, from County Road C to Beam Avenue, a no- parking zone. Direct the Public Works Department to put up the appropriate signs. Boardmember Robinson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Wasiluk b. Bui Remodel and New Fuel Islands - In "n" Out Mar et 743 N. Century Av ue The ap 'cant Ray Muckala was present at the mee g. Mr. Muckala gave a presenta 'on of his proposal. Mr. Muckala said h would be using the same style brick as o the existing building and would be ing the same materials for the 1 emersion o e canopy as on the existing can y. Mr. Muckala said he has obtained a H 'day franchise and proposes to hange the colors to the same colors used by e Holiday stores. This wo d include a red and blue stripe below the fascia levation, stripes underne h the canopy at the top of the posts, and painting the b 'ding and canopy fas 'a black. The windows will be the same as the existing doves with blac frames. Mr. Muckala said he does not want to screen the so side of the ba storage yard for security reasons. Boardmember Holder mobTd the Coromunity Design Review Board recommend:. 1) Adoption of the resol 'on 'ch approves a conditional use permit to enlarge the motor fuel a on at 743 North Century Avenue. Approval is based on the findings re iced by ordinance and subject to the foll owing conditions: a) All constructio shall f6kiow the site plan that the City stamped August 25, 1 2. The D ector of Community Development may approve r changes. b) The prop ed construction mu be substantially started within one year afte the Council approves 'permit or it shall become null and vo' . The Council may .grant p to one one -year extension' of the p 't. c) The/City Council shall review this perm in one year. 2) - App/grshhallof the plans that the City has stamped A3gust 25, 1992 for the Chato the motor fuel station at 743 North Century Avenue. The own do the following: I SEP 2 i DENNIS BATTY S ASSOCIATES lw-ARCHITECTS 6860 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55430 [61 2] 560 -6814 September 18 1992 Mr. Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE First Evangelical Free Church Maplewood, MN Dear Mr. Ekstrand, Thank you for the consideration of your Design Review Committee on. the proposal for building additions at First Evangelical Free Church on September 8, 1992. The following comments review our areas of particular concern and we would appreciate your further examination of these items. Reference: Recommendation 2g ( Memorandum page 3 ) The church presently maintains the yards with hoses and indivi- dual sprinklers. This is necessary to accomodate the preschool requirements, as well as maintaining the yard to look good. The owner will provide a lawn sprinkler system in the area of the new construction and the landscaped strip at the south property line. The owner would like to defer installation of the sprinkler system on the north half of the property, as well as the north east corner ( future parking) , until a later date. (See attach- ment A)* Recommendation 2i The church will provide terming and planting in the 10' of landscape area between the parking lot curb line and the walkway easement. However, we feel that this will present a security problem, reduce the walks usefulness, provide a hiding place for someone wanting to threaten others, and make the walkway a tunnel or no man's land. We would appreciate the latitude of providing landscaping which is agreeable with the three neighbors most affected, and something we feel will be attractive to the walkway users, This will provide a reasonable amount of head light shield as intended by the code requirement. We will submit such a plan before construction for your review. If this will require a .variance please inform me of the timing and procedure, 17 Attachment 8 City of Maplewood September 18 1992 Page 2 Recommendation 3 As we reviewed at the Design Review Committee Meeting the roadway was built with an extra 8 on the east side and probably used to accomodate bus parking. This extra width makes it possible to safely park on this side of the street. This extra width is used by parents who want to walk their children into the school. We have provided a one way drive and 4 parking places for this, some of the parents will still want to park on the street if the drive and parking areas fill up, This extra width is also used by the neighbors for party guests, etc, The church would like to request that the parking be allowed except for 30' to left and 10 to right of driveway exits. This would allow visibility to access the roadway safely and allow use of the extra width of the roadway in a manner simi 1 iar to it's original intent (See attachment B), Thank you for your consideration of these items. Sincere 1 , Phil Joh son Dennis Batty & Associates PJ /mjb Enc . cc: Jim Gustafson IN in . r '' = ` 1 Ile PROPOSED CURB 1 .. CUT PROPOSED/ L.F MIM 5 CURB CUT — . of otf dwoop 1 i I CAN l f '`1 ' . 1 :• ; ; : ' t ! j 1 j 01, 000 il 11 EXISTING CURB CUT illlt 1 Wc2WIaLI.YW H, E tt Via;:• ° •:: i I • L i i MOO DO )TTITL Vic• •, .;:x,;. iii!' ; it PROPOSED ,: . • :' J• ' • J' l ' /; y : ' • •!J', ••; ::'•x.1 . • .V •. }, • :• • • • • 'l :, : :• '•• I ' 1o:r: .....• Syr {.;: v .,. '''• (' is r. : :,:: :; 1i`!''''' :.•• .;.,..: ; ,•:. •' •`: • .+.'•{:: •. : l.., {• CURB S .. •' f•: %'.,::.., ,. {t ; .f' •,. « ..:.''•:::. 1 Jill Jill E X I S T I b C : r >:: f::+: ' •y:. :; ::. •'• ff S : •y ' 'f • :• ti.,.,.: :.: ;.';Jti;. NY, q!ON IA— iy ,8 : . is :•l ;s:;::•% . fi k { ' ' ;• `••,'.%'::: ,: y CURB CUT • •.• ::.: ' woo 1) lit . 10001Z ..0 t 1 - • •• • _ •' .- + •rte r r ' I ' / j PROPOSED PHASE II CONSTRUCTION WIND PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN 19 Attachment A 4 N Te f WpRSHIP ma a[ ea< M1.0 46 * T WWO CD QWMIM do" milmossonom NUNN* anoom 22 - eMid , Z t, 22 b of rrAa 4? • ,• r f t 7/ 0-0- Pa l -, ` i . ••: _/l . . . b_ t .. .11...: 7, HAZE.LWOi ' l t * 1 i' t { : ti ' ,: ,-j - ; UV. .1 PA J .• y R dd fi• pow, , DU 1 !•," J1. •..r •.J` „• j j r } , 1 ( i J m ema MEMO SWOOP swoop MEMO 41M m 4mi” MINES OL NORTH .. _ I 0 D poSITEPLAN t I SCALE lit = so' — al PHASF TM\ 08 a 41, SN ti', ' -~ - EJ U :1 tC,Z . C. - 3 + . yam S j : / i, __ . r .Cc , u fl A ! N ' 1.,D'' ; ,, , tin ° „ , , I ;1 o . t, t i uu . 1 1, , - 1:, t ; . ! % \3. 1 1 1/ i .I • ,: j {• ' j r r f : / *} I t ,,,• • l 't q I 1. • i + \ M V ' 1 .J .r I .l. i -/ .- r V ! JV., }" • .1 J 1 l i 7 1 jR t l t '" 1 i • i "' • I • i 1 a j ' ' J f . , i w .r _ J J t i p ?j t,., a , i i: I l. ` ) ( f 1 1 t 1 w I _ i 1 I - t - ' I - .. .. l -- _,•.. _• ,l'.J.,,• ../r /• ,i t !. .1 :: : ! : j '•, rr ,' ; '; ' s t j 1 I • s / I r , , , .1 ,i... r . .'!• i ..i •.f 'j. I .. /'. Y V V ( .'j I a 1 • L1i 1 : ,• • . l •./ • '! C / t .I ; 'i ! • ! w I V j • . ` ff ! 1 / 1 ( r r / J 4 ! . i • aJ• • - r •.% i.i J i .. iJ.. ! • I • w • i • , j ` (I' 1 f. 1 f. ,.1.. ! 1• • ` I r f 1 1 f 1 1. •• i 1. •' ! tt .. • .>• j r ( "1 r ' \/ rJ :,{.l - •,r.'..'a :. • ./ , ;.'"j% ..'J • t..l•: ' W • `.J: ..t 'Jt I i : r .t a j . r 1 T f.J' Ff 1 l f i s ! i f i G - MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit and Design Review 743 North Century Avenue Ray Muckala September 4, 1992 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Requests lotion by Council ml Endors a d...... Modifie Re j ecte Dat® Ray Muckala is requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) and approval of plans to enlarge his fuel station as a Holiday station store. Reason for the CUP City Code prohibits motor fuel stations within 350 feet of a residential lot line. The entire fuel station site is within 350 feet of residential lot lines. The fuel station is, therefore, a nonconforming use. The Code requires a CUP to enlarge a nonconforming use. Project Description Mr. Muckala proposes to: 1. Add two fuel islands between the existing fuel islands and the building. Each island would have two dispensers and could fuel one car on each side. 2. Enlarge the existing pump - island canopy and connect it to the building. 3. Remove the front five feet from the In "n" out Market. (See the drawings on pages 8 and 10.) Mr. Muckala wants to move the front wall to update the building's appearance and widen the drive. The new facade would be brick to match the building. BACKGROUND October 23, 1989: The City Council approved a conditional use permit for a use that is similar to Mr. Muckala's request. The permit allows the service station at 2271 White Bear Avenue (Flemings Auto Service) to expand, including a convenience store, new fuel pumps and a new canopy. Fleming's Auto Service, like Mr. Muckala's station, is a nonconforming use. Both are within 350 feet of residential properties. July 7, 1992: The staff approved plans for a new entrance to Mr. Muckala's convenience store. This entrance is under construction. DISCUSSION The intent of City Code is to prevent motor fuel stations from locating near residential neighborhoods. In this case, the changes would not effect the surrounding homes. Mr. Muckala's building buffers the homes to the west from the pumps. Additional traffic from the new pumps would come and go from Century Avenue or Minnehaha Avenue. The new pumps would not add any noise or traffic for the surrounding homes. The owner should screen the south side of the back storage yard so it is at least 80% opaque. There is a chain -link fence and gate there now. Screening the storage yard would improve the appearance from Minnehaha Avenue. Mr. Muckala has built a decorative fence on the other sides. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt the resolution on page 14. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to enlarge the motor fuel station at 743 North Century Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: a. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped August 25, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. b. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the Council approves this permit or it shall become null and void. The Council may grant up to one one-year extension of the permit. C. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 2. Approve the plans that the City has stamped August 25, 1992 for the changes to the motor fuel station at 743 North Century Avenue. The owner shall do the following• a. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. b. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits and a handicap parking sign- 2 C. Post "no parking" signs in front of the building between the attendant and the fuel islands. d. Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any requwred work that is not completed by occupancy. The required escrow amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The property owner shall give City staff an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfuiished work. CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed the 44 property owners within 350 feet of Mr. Muckala's property. Fifteen owners replied. Four were in favor, two objected and nine had no comment. In Favor 1. I am in favor because of the same reasons stated by the applicant. (A & E Properties of Stillwater) 2. I don't object to this proposal, but I don't think that it will improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. I think it will do the opposite. It will add more congestion to an already very busy intersection. (Erickson,. 2670 Minnehaha Avenue) opposed We feel there is enough fuel pumps and traffic now. (Tangen, 763 Mayhill Road) 4 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.27 acres Existing land use: Maplewood Auto Service and the In "n" Out Market SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Century A& W South: Minnehaha Avenue and McDonald's Restaurant West: Single Dwellings East: North Century Avenue and the Freedom Fuel Station PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: SC (service commercial) Zoning: BC (business commercial) Code Requirements Section 36 -151 (b) (9) (c) does not allow motor fuel stations within 350 feet of a residential lot line. Section 36 -17(e) allows the enlargement of a nonconforming use by CUP if it would not affect the development of the parcel as it is zoned. Criteria for Approval Section 36- 442(a) states that the City Council may grant a CUP, subject to the nine standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 14 and 15. gob- 3:muckala.mem (25) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Existing Site Plan 4. Proposed Site Plan 5. Front Wall Detail 6. Mr. Muckala's letter dated July 30, 1992 7. Resolution 5 7T LARP£NTEUR AV 1680 N * N o Q T29 N R22W. p IDAHO AV 14113 _j O 4252 Y N J 7TpNAICY i (1) CURR IE ST ..... 2) MYRTLE CT p / MICHAEL OR 18 RASKA AV 55 ! 2 REBECCA DR 2) 314 L 3 PINE TREE DR o <: — — 4 B/RCHY/EW DR Ry 2 t 4 N Pk JY, i R :,: 1 4 4 0 8 BENiLANA C.< 5 PINE TREEDR Z OAKHILL — = 6 BIRCH TREE DR ANGELA:::: 7 ROLLING HILLS DR ANTELOPE WAY dims Proirie 2 AMBERJACK. -LA tt MICKEY 5% 6 jiLAf.:: 3 BEAVERDALE RD o ivy 4 BOBCAT LA ELKHEART LA + 5 CODGER LA OLPjH /N DRS Cn 68 lCQYOTE w z I MA 4 + j31 A — IAN 1 ip AV HAWTHORNE Aai 1200 N. 1200 N. E. ROSE N ST 3 68 J GERPN GERAANI o 'li B°dKer MAGNOL AV 4V O 0 Geranium9oNz W W J J z z CASEAVAV o AR ESTER z U. AV 9 6 0 N.960N. A X W X > W CD T1LL`N c a w BRAND ,y EL LA AV 32 j a ......32 Maplewood a NatureF- :..:_:. m SEVENTH ST E Center E. 10 z :.::::. Q Z 10 0 J C12 BUSH AV-f W Cr 4 MINNEHAHA m AV 72oN. 720 N! 5 N MARGARET 480 N. Lions`.;: Pk w 25i , J 2 r tz a r' 1te t , 110 JL - FREM 2' a km W i L Ja U. a252U 480 N. LOCATION MAP Q N 6 Attachment 1 C N Y i ! AV SERVICE DR t210 == - ; 1 ! c*- • ! I r rtrv-i i ! L J 12351 E i 1 ! 1. T - — 1 ! I I Sq 11240 'L _ ..r' (— —i r 480 N. LOCATION MAP Q N 6 Attachment 1 ir 6.41 I e Q O --. _._. --- — — _..._ N M 84 ° Sri 2!) s Cam) ; 10 9o 180.7`tl Uj ( 36) a 127490 „( r pr 81. 1<10 -_ d 744 A &w 743 , 749 T5 UNION CEMETARY 1 co • ...r. •::743 J , ••:::•::•: IN'N OUT MINNEHAHA AVENUE w c c erg! D +o _.. `;. nr +o' onED ., t 33' 33• 119 • 0, '" M It9.0 11 5 S • .rF`'' 8'' , I hICDONo • o+ 0.5 o5 ALD Z 0 io 01 i - a " - W2730 >If (W (S) 2696 0 a or r t I f 269$ C 0 2700 705 Zf - W2702 (J I r— = oZ 1 25 a.0 . . 7It i • N. . 1f1 T 1 R •I 9 o 7 8 9 101' os 461 f g U + I o l I I g 40 (1 s3 0 ` t p3 L I CZ 1t9, .TES' 75j MARGARET AV E. - 3 ('- •" 8 i 7 • 283.02 290' C 1(51) (S a) GOP 10 43) en tti+c t 5 2 3 ZA)c o ! i T v ; i ( a scNI , g f sK:9 To Vi IIage for G %de.nv%&A H LP. A- Z9- IM roc- 14Vt63 am) A X A 21 1* 8 06A oO3 • w PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE 7 Attachment 2 4 N 51' r - Poi. r 0 W Z W Er BUILDING PORTION Z w TO BE REMOVED MINNEHAHA AVENUE SITE PLAN EXISTING LAYOUT Attachment 3 4 N W Z W a 0 v MINNEHAHA AVENUE Wig &M - 1 MvJ ii SITE PLAN PROPOSED LAYOUT a J Attachment 4 4 N EAST ELEVATION NEW WALL Tj 1__r_ _N era LL .. : - • crv. 'j,1NbLLT' G Nt1t - #ce hL'aG i ---- -1 ter- .: .: .' ....... —... • - -- ... F _-.-SEE - SMIiGTU24t_ D "WlrtP faR G D`+it`+so; -i5, g OLD WALL FRONT WALL DETAIL io AUG 219992 M -L=_lQ7_L=u U I_n_ Attachment 5 CIa 21.7 a t4 f j .... y . Y ` `o f 1 40 _..is-ILI EAST ELEVATION NEW WALL Tj 1__r_ _N era LL .. : - • crv. 'j,1NbLLT' G Nt1t - #ce hL'aG i ---- -1 ter- .: .: .' ....... —... • - -- ... F _-.-SEE - SMIiGTU24t_ D "WlrtP faR G D`+it`+so; -i5, g OLD WALL FRONT WALL DETAIL io AUG 219992 M -L=_lQ7_L=u U I_n_ Attachment 5 IN 'N' OUT FOOD STORE 743 N. CENTURY AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55119 TELEPHONE (612) 738 -8838 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN. 55109 Dear Review Board, I wish to respond specifically to the criteria for approval of a conditional use permit in specific according to each point: 1. This use is presently located, designed, maintained and operated in conformity with the City' s comprehensive plan and Code of Ordinances and will continue to be in the future. 2. The use will not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area in the slightest. 3. The use will not change property values at all. 4. The use will not involve anything that is not being done in the present useage and will most certainly not cause anything dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, or disturbing, or cause a nuisance. 5. The use will not generate any additional vehicular traffic nor congestion and will only service existing. traffic. 6. The use is presently se and services. This will 7. There will be no change and services required. 8. This use would maximize and aesthetics for this 9. There will be no change effects for this use. AUG 14M2 rved by all public facilities not change at all. in the public facilities the developmental design type of use . in the environmental Thank you for your consideration. Si cerely yours, Raym d Muckala 11 Attachment 6 IN 'N' OUT FOOD STORE 743 N. CENTURY AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55119 TELEPHONE (612) 738 -8838 July 30, 1992 City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B. Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Review Board: We own and operate a stationstore on the corner of Century and Minnehaha Avenue in Maplewood. There has been a fueling station on this site since the 1930's, and a convenience Store since 1963. Over the years, customers needs and community expectations, as well as competition in the market place, have changed tremendously. Adapting an existing facility to these changes is very challenging, to say the least. In order to more effectively adapt to these changing times, we would like to convert our location to a Holiday Stationstore and' confirm to their image as closely as possible. Two of the needs that Holiday and I have identified as developing in our Community are as follows: 1. Customers want to be able to refuel their automobiles and then walk into the store without being unnecessarily exposed to our sometimes inclement Minnesota weather. 2: They want to be able to leave.their automobiles at the Fueling site while they purchase other items in the store. This increases the requirement for the number of pumps in order to serve the same number of customers. Since we are anxious to provide what our customers want, we wish to extend our fueling canopy to the building, and to provided 1/2 of an additional fueling island. We will also need to rebuild the south end of the storefront in order to accomodate these changes. Continue on Page 2 12 July 30, 1992 Page 2 By accomplishing this, we will: 1. Improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. 2.. Enhance the aesthetics of the community by bringing our storefront in conformance with modern designs and presenting a more modern fueling configuration. 3. Reduce energy useage by rebuilding the storefront with insulated glass and insulated walls. 4. Remain competitive with other stationstores. S. Provide an improved level of service to the community. I hope you act favorably on my request. Thank you for your consideration. cerely, Ray nd Muckala 13 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ray Muckala applied for a conditional use permit to enlarge his fuel station. WHEN, this permit applies to 743 North Century Avenue. The legal description is: Subject to ditch, Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 1, Cahanes Addition WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on 1992. They recommended that the City Council this permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1992. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the rCity staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the Cites Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 14 Attachment 7 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the .City stamped August 25, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the Council approves this .permit or it shall become null and void. The Council may grant up to one one -year extension of the permit. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. Adopted 1992. 15 Community Design Review Board Minutes of 9 -8 -92 3) Make the east side Hazelwo d Avenue, from County Road C to Beam Avenue -parkingno Direct the Public Works Department to put up the appropriate s. Boardmember R nson seconded Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Wasiluk b. Building Remodel and New Fuel Islands - In "n' out Market, 743 N. Century Avenue The applicant Ray Muckala was present at the meeting. Mr. Muckala gave a presentation of his proposal. Mr. Muckala said he would be using the same style brick as on the existing building and would be using the same materials for the extension of the canopy as on the existing canopy. Mr. Muckala said he has obtained a Holiday franchise and proposes to change the colors to the same colors used by the Holiday stores. This would include a red and blue stripe below the fascia elevation, stripes underneath the canopy at the top of the posts, and painting the building and canopy fascia black. The windows will be the same as the existing windows with black frames. Mr. Muckala said he does not want to screen the south side of the back storage yard for security reasons. Boardmember Holder moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: 1) Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to enlarge the motor fuel station at 743 North Century Avenue. Approval is based on the findings required by ordinance and subject to the following conditions: a) All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped August 25, 1992. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. b) The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after the Council approves this permit or it shall become null and void. The Council may grant up to one one -year extension of the permit, c) The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 2) Approval of the plans that the City has stamped August 25, 1992 for the changes to the motor fuel station at 743 North Century Avenue. The owner shall do the following: Community Design Review Board Minutes of 9 -8 -92 a) Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. b) Install reflectorzed stop signs at all exits and a handicap parking sign. c) Post "no parking signs in front of the building between the attendant and the fuel islands. d) Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work that is not completed by occupancy. The required escrow amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.. The property owner shall give City staff an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - - Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Wasiluk G- 7 MEMORANDUM Action by Council TO: City Manager Endorsed FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Modifie SUBJECT: Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance RejectedDATE: August 19, 1992 Date INTRODUCTION Councilmember Rossbach is proposing change the regulations about single I have added additional changes to had with the ordinance, an ordinance that would and double dwelling setbacks. correct problems that we have BACKGROUND September 9, 1991 The City Council approved the current ordinance. The current ordinance requires a setback from 30 to 35 feet. The Director of Community Development may approve a larger setback if the house meets one of five conditions in the ordinance. DISCUSSION The proposed ordinance makes the following major changes for the R -1 (single dwelling) , RE (residential estate) , R - 1S (small -lot single dwelling), and R -2 (double dwelling) districts: 1. It adds new definitions of setbacks and drops conflicting requirements for setback encroachments, such as overhangs. In the current code, one definition allows two feet of overhangs and another definition allows 18 inches of overhangs. (Section 36 - on page 3.) 2. It requires that a house be sit back between the setbacks of adjacent houses. (Subsection 36- 70(a)(1) on page 4.) 3. It allows a house to be at or five feet behind the predominant setback. The current ordinance requires that a house be at the predominant setback. (Subsection 36- 70 (a) (2 ) on page 4 .) 4. Despite the setbacks for new construction, this ordinance would allow homeowners to add onto their homes using the setback of the existing structure. (Subsection 36- 70(a)(4) on page 5.) As an example, a house set back 40 feet could add on to the front of the house at 40 feet. The current code requires a maximum setback of 35 feet. 5. Where there is a garage and dwelling on one side of a lot, the minimum setbacks shall be five feet for the garage and ten feet for the house. The current ordinance requires ten feet for both. {Section 36-71(a) on nacre 5.) 6. It requires that corner lots meet the maximum setback requirements on both streets. The maximum s 'setbacks in thecurrentordinanceonlyapplytothefrontsetback. Subsection 36-71(a) (1) on page 5.) 7. It allows uncovered decks to be up to five feet from thesidelotline. Covered decks must be at least ten feet fromthesidelotline. The current code does not define whatthesetbackfordecksshallbe. (Subsection 36- 71(a)(2) on page 6.) 8. It exempts the RE -40 zone from the maximum front setback requirements. (section 36- 83(c)(2) on page 6.) Note that I have repeated the changes on pages 3 -6 on a es 4 -11fortheR -1S and R -2 districts p g RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. go \b 3:setbacks.mem (5.3) Attachment: Ordinance 2 ORDINANCE NUMBER AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLINGS The Maplewood Cit Council approves the followin ordinance: ( I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions. Section 1. This section chan three existin definitions and adds seven new definitions to section 36-6 (definitions Covered structure: A structure with a roof. Front line of the dwellin The lon side of a building that faces a street. If the front wall has an an the lon section shall be the front line. The len of Parallel sections shall be added togethe to determine the lon section. On an interior lot, the director of com development may consider the short side of the building to be the front. The director shall base this decision on the desi of the house. Front lot line: The lot line that abuts a street ri -of- way line. on a corner lot, the front lot line shall be the line that is most parallel to the front line of the dwellin If the City determines that the dwellinhas no front line or that the line is eauallv parallel to both lot. lines, then the property owner shall choose a front lot line. Lot depth: The distance from the front lot line to the rear lot lines. Predominant setback-.* The setback of the majority of the dwellin on the same side of the same street and within three hundred fift (-350) feet of the lot to be built on. Rear lot line: The lot line that is opposite and most pa to the front lot line. Side lot line: The lot lines.that connect the front and rear lot lines. Front yard setback: The distance between anypart of a structure and a street ri -of -wa line. A corner lot shall have a front yard setback on each street fronta The front yard setback shall not include eaves, a gutters, cornices or chimneys that project no more than two (2) feet into the yard. The front yard setback shall also not include sidewalks, steps, ramps or at- 'Patios that have no walls, solid fence or roof. Rear yard setback: The distance between any part of a structure and the rear propert line. The rear-yard. shall not include eaves, crutters, cornices, steps ramps or chimneys that project no more than two (2) feet into the yard. Side yard setback: The distance between any part of a structure and the side property 11" ne. The side yard shall not include eaves, gutters, cornices, steps, ramps or chimneys that project no more than two (2)--feet into the yard Si 0 Ween in a n e er-g%i= 3 ne rE =L. %noF =LLL tw 146hL eo Af %no e e e . f. IlEo lfl e, LP., 3UL aim :3 4%0L i ifis % 1:6 4- Ini is %eo Aqlft is elxaw :1= cmol ar n e e r e a e eerni:ees..,, Section 2. This section changes section 36 -70 through 36 -72, R -1 single dwelling) district regulations, as follows: See. 36 -70. Front yards. a), Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more than thirty -five (35) feet . Except that. ; 1) If each of the lots next t an interior lot have dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street• The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adlacent dwelling farthest from the street. 2) If subsect ion (a )(1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwellincr shall be no further eerni:ees..,, Section 2. This section changes section 36 -70 through 36 -72, R -1 single dwelling) district regulations, as follows: See. 36 -70. Front yards. a), Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more than thirty -five (35) feet . Except that. ; 1) If each of the lots next t an interior lot have dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street• The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adlacent dwelling farthest from the street. 2) If subsect ion (a )(1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwellincr shall be no further forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the predominant setback. j-e t, %W A . .A, T aT.,,l l nl pixxiz UP~ %.4 Regardless of the above, if the Council has approved special setbacks for a development,. these setbacks shall apply. Approval cif a preliminary plat with building pads does not constitute approval of setbacks• 4) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. b ) The director of community development may allow a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2) The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in section 9 -188• 3) The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state or federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or noise regulations. 4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving, health or reasons. 3£'c. 'i.'I Sec. 36 - Side yards. a There shall be ' ea' —s. a' ' -4e a side yard setback of at least ten (10) feet to en any covered part %e SO.I. of a dwelling There shall, be a side yard setback of at least five (5) feet to en ' a garage _,_uncovered structure ~4e or -few a detached accessory structure 9 36 b. The following exceptions shall apply: 5 1) The front setback recfuirements, shall apply to the side yard on the street side of a corner lot. IAA:xr 0:4:e =:I= r=gMgM*:e a i%.O.L. L.%ftv%WO%WO 4 f im = A X A im 7jA in gIZAXM I I -Ine zai-1-14iri i=14winiz ==4 :ei CE 4=1 X 12 R i I J= nn J=j mxxp m aqw1 c 9jM4-jh:4 C3 i=1=i=ki= 4-1:1=4- igz 4 • • i I A i = 6== A=S 4=11=4= 1 . 3163AA, %ev eo J6 'EA x e e:bin eAL%.O-A..J6 LLL%.L %.Lj ,. v .&.eeve a 1%was SF %ep p et= • i MI=C%16 Joe" R C1 e n e a When two ( 2 ) or more adj oinin lots are used as a sin buildin site, the side yard re shall appl onl to the outside lot lines. Re of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes usin the existin setback. b ) The cit council ma approve a conditional use permit to construct a buildin addition into a minimum setback. Sec. 36-72, Rear yards. a) For the covered Darts of a dwelling, the minimum re rear yard setback shall be a line connectin a point on each side lot line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth, E.F.Ifi.e... rear- : fer eae.. In an R-1 4 a M 1 4- 1 b ) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall have a rear yard setback of at least five (5) fee C21=M 4ZAT03 1 i:M= :4 o except that, on a double-frontin eern lot, the front yard setback req 0 ments shall a sinizislacnic r2ren *:fulre %0' A, A -J6 A- %-0 A- %-I %wf %-0 b-0 %wP %-P 16 16 %0& 6-IFA A. %.41.46 J6 4h.0 %-P U044 %-0 ALL -L.AA-A-4LL%.4.LLL c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line. d) Re of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes usin the existin setback, e) The city council may approve a conditional use perm to construct a buildin addition into a minimum setback. Section 3 . This section chan section 36- 83 (c)(2) in the R-E Residential Estate Districts as follows: 2 All other setbacks shall be as re for the R-1 Residence District (sin dwellin except that the R-1 front vard setback re shall not appl to the RE-40 district. The minimum r front and setback in an RE-40 district shall be thirty (30) feet, Section 4. This section chan sections 36-84.4 throu 36- 84.6, R-1S (small-lot sin dwellin district re as follows: See. 36-84.4. Front yards. a, Each dwellin and accessor structure shall have a front yard setback of at least thirt (30 feet, but not more than thirt (35) feet. Except that - 1, If each of the lots adlacent to an interior lot have dwellin the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwellin closest to the street. The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwellin farthest from the street. If subsection (a (1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback, a dwellin shall be no further forward and more than five feet to the rear of the 4 0 i ; e J= ] ^. = = 9 — — a J 3 X A : 6 - J I= g= 1 lipredominantsetback -16 1- %w 4. J6 %.0 &LL%oL WA_ -L. %.o %w.L & 4ZAXV N - nn ^ sia= nf 4-1=k= M E:J X 4- Iq i 3 :XX ao& id 4 %0L 33*6 7-o 3 If the Council has approved special setbacks for a development, these setbacks shall apply. Approval of a preliminar plat with buildin Dads does not constitute approval of setbacks. 4 Re of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes usin the existin setback. The director of communit development ma allow a different setback if it would not adversel affect the draina of surroundin properties and if an of the followin conditions appl 1) The proposed setback would not affect the privac of adjacent homes, 2 ) The proposed setback would save si natural features, as defined in section 9-188, 7 3) The proposed setback is necessar to meet cit state or federal re such as the pipeline setback or noise re 4) The proposed setback is necessar for 'ener health or safet reasons. 0 0 as a M3:H3:CM 4-:XX =]A n eens it f.e.rr aeeesser,.:,xx ]Btl JLA6 %4AL -is 4=4 e S., JL.L%.O %.I %.,L a use Oft Vft reef WIL Sec. 36-8495* Side yards, There shall be feet to any covered Dart yard setback of at least structure or detached aci appl a side yard setback of at least ten (10 of a dwellin There shall be a side five (5 feet to a garae. uncovered In a e7h 1 e-` -slh a 3 3 ahveessorystructure. N-%WV%O* &a CE 1 n4:' M 3A4- Anatenene The followin exceptions shall 1 The front yard setback --re shall appl to the side yard on the street side of a corner lot =IAM j4j=L nC= Mj 3aA= j = 4- :XX 1:2131 _PjMjM4= 2 When two ( 2 ) or more adj oinin lots are used as a sin buildin site, the side yard re shall appl onl to the outside lot lines. Re of the above , homeowners may add on to their homes usin the existin setback. The city council ma approve a conditional use loermit, to construct a buildin addit or part thereof, into a minimum setback. Sec. 36-84o6 Rear yards. a) For the covered Darts of a dwellin the minimum reauired rear yard setback shall be a line connectin a point on each side lot line that is twent (20) percent of the lot deDth, rear-A- j 7hui 3 4nb ) Accessor structures and uncovered structures i shall have a rear yard setback of at least five (5) feet- except that, on a double - fronting lot, the front yard setback r guirements shall apply, c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line. Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback The city council may approve a conditional use permit to construct a building addition into a minimum setback. Section 5. This section changes sections 36 - 89 through 36 - 91, R- 2 (double dwelling) district regulations, as follows: Sec. 36 - 89. Front yards. Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more than thirty -five (35) feet . Except that: , If each of the lots adjacent to an interior lot have dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent dwelling farthest from the street, If subsection (a) (1) above does not apply and there is a predominant setback,, dwelling shall be no further forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the Predominant setback. i- the i,. - - ^ at.T- ..L If the Council has approved spec setbacks for a specific development, these setbacks shall apply_ Approval of a preliminary plat with building pads does not constitute approval of setbacks. Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes using the existing setback. The director of community development may allow a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 2) The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in section 9 -188, 3) The proposed setback is necessar to meet cit state or federal re such as the pipeline setback or noise re 4 The proposed setback is necessar for ener health or safet reasons. fa-_ Ne r aeeesser 3 , 1x 1 %1 A — Ij S1 4 4.A. a Sec. 36-90. Side yards. sideThereshallbe .1we'E. SIFtEl"'Al- have a side yard setback of at least ten (10) feet to en an covered part of adwellin There shall be a side setback of at least five ( 5 ) feet to en I= 4=o a garage_, uncovered structure %IOL %Wo or a detached accessor structure T. &a& e'r. %ewo SPI %& %A& .316 36 bb e a 34Ia3i14 ' 0 The followin exceptions shall appl 1) The front -yard setback requirements shall aDiDlv to the side yard on the street side of a corner lot, a jMF j j i=:xx A CE i=L I= 4zalm 1 3Emee4%-Aaka:'E. J6A. %WJL.L%..O LLL%A xmx iz 4z L =I= 1:4 3 1 4 A = ri 4 rM r2i= rg im Ih on U f01freift 'Eha'E SW'%=WrL.%eOe'EP 'Eh%aA'EP Js 4i:F-42 iz= i A- %N.O.L.j f J= 4- 3 3 JAI I j 1 4 IA 4-er a44 4=L = i= 3 ni= hal I Ick333 :141= = :M4- A ia7 IVV% 12A-(4+ When two ( 2 ) or more adj oinin lots are used as a sin buildin site, the side yard re shall appl onl to the outside lot lines. 3) Recfardless of the above homeowners may add on to their homes- usin the existin setback. b), The cit council may approve a conditional use permit to construct a buildin addition, or -part thereof into a minimum setback• 10 Sec. 36-91. Rear yards. a, For.the covered Darts of , a dwellin the minimum re rear yard setback shall be a line connectin a point on each side lot line that is twent (20 ) .'Percent of the lot dep 04= 01-4=3 3 Ifik a...3cVFe a 4%-S %i &E- Irl ffiE14 %m. A.L %.4a a b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall have a rear yard setback of at least fi ( 5).-.. feet; ThNWO %.V %04 3 a== :I=IqAIA C24VVJVk I roil :6 J= L :6:= J= ICJ gZ La 3 m4= 3 i except that, on a double - fronti 1 A. 4 a lot, the front yard setback requirements shall appl %a im 4= Ick a to it- :Eadn=a & A6 %0 %OALL c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line, d) Re of the above, homeowners may add on to their homes usin the existin setback. The cit council ma approve a conditional. upermit to construct a buildin addition into a minimum setback. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval. Approved b the Maplewood Cit Council on , 19929 Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 8 -17 -92 1j All con tructio am n shall follow the site plan that the City st ed July 17, 1992. The Director of CommunityDevelopmenmayapproveminoranges. 2) The City Cou it shall rev this permit in one year. 3) The operator sha have telephone on the site for emergencies. 4) If there is not eno g parking, the operator or property owner sh 1 p ovide more paved parking spaces. 5) The operators 11 not al ow parking on Highway 61. 6) The operator shall keep the eeds and tall grass cut along the f ont property line. 7) The operator shall provide toile facilities for employe s during business hours. Commission r Pearson seconded Ayes -- llenspach, Anitzbe er, Fischer, Gerke, Pe rson, Rossbach, Sigmundik The otion passed. b. Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance Secretary Olson presented the staff report and discussed with the Commission the proposed changes to this ordinance. Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of.the ordinance changing the setback requirementsforR -1 (single dwelling) , RE (residential estate) , R -1S small -lot single dwelling) and R -2 (double dwelling, including the major changes proposed in the August 10 staff report and the additional wording in the "Front line of the dwelling" section. Commissioner Anitzberger The motion passed. C* Metro 2015 Review Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Fischer, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik The Commi s(he reviewed the letter to the MetropolitanCouncildontingthePlanningCommission /Council comments, Commission approved the letter and referredittostffbemailed. ar —I MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance DATE: August 27, 1992 INTRODUCTION Action by Council;; Endorsed Modifie Rejecte Date The City Council requested an ordinance that would limit the people who could appeal the staff approval of minor construction plans and single dwellings. The current ordinance allows anyone to appeal a staff decision within 15 days of that decision. The Council raised this issue because of a delay in the construction of a new home for Mr. Rick Westberg on Hazelwood Avenue. Mr. Westberg wanted to build his home further back than the maximum 35 -foot setback required by Code. Staff approved the setback after the adjacent neighbors said they had no objections. Several council members wanted to add this request to the next agenda, so Mr. Westberg would not have to wait 15 days for a decision. However, we had to wait the full fifteen days in case anyone else appealed. BACKGROUND Under the current procedure, the director of community development makes the first decision. The director only notifies the city council about this decision. However, the ordinance allows anyone to appeal this decision. An appeal must be made within fifteen days after the director sends a copy of the approved plan to the council. If there is an appeal, the director sends the appeal to the community design review board. Anyone may appeal the board's decision to the council. They must appeal within fifteen days after the board's decision. On May 28, 1992, the Council tabled this ordinance for changes from Councilmember Rossbach. Most of his changes apply to the single and double dwelling setback ordinance. One change applies to this ordinance. This change shortens the appeal period for staff decisions from 15 to 5 days. I have made this change on page on page 3, subsection 25- 65(b). There would still be a 15- day appeal period for community design review board decisions. The extra time is needed to prepare minutes. DISCUSSION The current ordinance allows anyone to appeal the director's decision. This causes a delay when the applicant and the city council agree not to appeal the director's decision. We must still wait the full fifteen days to see if anyone else appeals the decision. An appeal from anyone else is unlikely, since I only notify the applicant and the council. The proposed ordinance does the following: 16 It limits those who can appeal a decision on a minor construction project to the applicant, community design review board and city council. The ordinance limits those who can appeal a decision on a single dwelling to the applicant and council. (Subsection 25 -65 (b) on page 3.) 2. It sends an appeal of a single dwelling directly to the city council. The current ordinance requires that the community design review board review the appeal first. (Subsection 25 -65 (b) on page 3 . ) 3. It shortens the time allowed for the Council to appeal the director's decision from 15 to 5 days. (Subsection 25 -65 b) on page 3.) 4. It only requires a community design review board application for projects that will be reviewed by the board. The current ordinance requires an application for all projects, including those that only need staff approval. (Subsection 25 -68 on page 4.) 51 It allows the director of community development to determine the application requirements. The current ordinance . specifies several requirements, many of which have changed. Some current requirements, such as a mailing list, are not included in the ordinance. (Subsection 25 -68 on page 4.) 6. It establishes a fee for planning staff review of plans. The proposed fees are similar to the fees we now charge for other planning staff reviews, such as variances and lot divisions. (Subsection 3 6 -2 0 (a) on page 5.) RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. go \b- 3:appeals.mem (5.3) Attachment: Ordinance 2 ORDINANCE NUMBER AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW OF BUILDING PLANS The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Section 1. This section changes section 25 -65 as follows: Sec. 25 -65e Approval of plans. a) The director of community development shall review all plans for minor construction. The director shall also review plans for single dwellings, where required by Code. The city council shall define minor construction by dollar valuations set by resolution ,.from time to time. Before approving the plans, the director must determine that the plans meet all city ordinances and policies, including the design standards in section 25- 70(b). The director may send any plan that he or she reviews to the community design review board. The director shall send a copy of any approved plan to the city council. b) Onlv a city council member, community design review board member or an applicant may appeal the director's decision about a minor construction project. Only a city council member or an applicant may appeal the director's decision about a sing dwe l l i ' La = 'g^ ^ =a The director shall send an app=r. .. about a single dwelling to the city council. The effected Parties may waive their right to an appeal by informing_ director of community development. An appeal must be received by the director of community development within five ( U fa. days after the director sends a copy of the approved plan to the city council. The director shall send an appeal of a minor construction project to the community design review board. The board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to the city council within fifteen (15) days after the board's decision. c) The community design review board shall review all other plans. The board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to the city council within fifteen (15) days after the board's decision. However, no person shall revise a plan that the city council originally approved without their approval. d) This section shall not apply to interior construction, repair, maintenance, underground tanks or the same -style replacement of building parts, such as a new roof, door or windows. Section 2. This section changes section 25 -68 as follows: Sec. 25 -68. Application i i ..yea -exA ev -OM3 =a - - rr s. I M. w...r. 'Ww All persons required to submit building or remodeling plans to the community design review board, including appeals, shall submit a community design review board application to the director of community development. The filing requirements shall be determined by the director of community_ development. A fee, but no application, is required for planning staff reviews of single dwellings and minor construction projects, - - , aS 4 j= 4- e3Lm d -,-er -m- MR ter % e. Ami= =;t W-9- 21. — 0 o , , M= am 3 L L % %.- %.-.L. SLT ".A. &-A TCI e$TLTa - W A - a ~ Ict n + v A. w . 9 .. AM 89 1 . i I. WIN ELWI" 141 9 s , MRrjMMr--% -W MER: W-9- 21. — o , , M= am 3 L L % %.- %.-.L. SLT ".A. &-A TCI e$TLTa - W A - a ~ Ict n + v A. w . 9 .. AM 89 1 . i I. WIN ELWI" 141 9 s , Section 3 . Add the following fees to section 36-20(a): Where the Code requires that the director of community development review plans for single dwellinas. (The director of community development shall add this fee to the building permit. .............. .... ....................... $57 Review of minor construction projects by the director of community development. (The director of community development shall add this fee to the building permit. .............. $85 County recording fee for resolutions. . 9 o * o e e e * 1 $17 Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on , 1992. 5 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 18.30 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, XAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MAY 12 1992 10 CALL TO ORDER Acting Chai erson Robinson called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Donald Moe Marvin Erickson Michael Holder Marie Robinson Bruce Thompson Scott. Wasiluk 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a. April 28, 1992 Boardmember Thomps 28 1992, as subm' t Absent Absent Present Present Prese Abse oved approval of the minutes of April Boardmember Holdkr seconded Ayes -- Holder, Robinson, Thompson 4. APPROVAL OF AGEND Boardmember Thom son moved approva of the agenda as submitted. Boardmember Ho der seconded Ayes -- Holder, Robinson, Thompson 5. UNFINISHED PUSINESS 60 DESIGN REVIEW a. Code Amendment - Appeal Procedure Secretary Ekstrand presented the staff report and discussed with the Board the proposed code amendment that would limit the people who could appeal the staff approval of minor construction plans and single dwellings. Boardmember Holder moved approval of the ordinance changing the procedure for review of building plans. Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes -- Holder, Robinson, Thompson 7. VISITOR ENTATIONS There we no visitor presentations. s AGENDA ITEM — AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish c t i on by Council Endorsed Mod.if jed Re j ected _. D SUBJECT: Assessment Appeals --City Projects 86 -27, 87 -01, 87 -14, 88 -12, 90 -14 DATE:. September 21, 1992 Introduction Assessment hearings were held for five projects on September 14, 1992. Three appeals were received for Larpenteur Avenue, City Project 86 -27. Two appeals were received for Roselawn, Jackson to Rice, City Project 87 -01. No appeals were received for Holloway, City Project 87 -14. Twelve appeals were received for Beam Avenue, TH 61 to County Road D, City Project 88 -12. Eleven appeals were received for County Road B, City Project 90 -14. A review of each appeal and recommendation follows. Each appeal is marked with project number and a circled number for reference. Background Project 86 -27 1 Recommend approval of appeal. Drainage does not go to project. 2 Recommend approval of appeal. Drainage does not go to project. 3 Deny Project 87 -01 1 Deny 2 Deny Project 88 -12 Deny all 12 appeals. It was stated at the public hearing that it was intended to assess each parcel so that the future record would clearly show that all parcels had been assessed. The commitment of the developer to pay these assessments is a matter between the developer and the property owner. It does not affect the assessments. Assessment Appeals 2 September 21, 1992 Project 90 -14 1 Reduce from four to three storm sewer units due to proximity of petroleum pipeline. 2 Deny. The attached letter concerning the right of way was sent to the property owner. 3 from two to one storm sewer units due to location of house. 4 Deny. Although the house is in the middle of the .lot, it may well be reasonable to remove it and build two new structures in the future. 5 through 11 Deny. Recommendation Revise . the assessments for PIN 17- 29 -22 -34 -0041, 17- 29 -22 -34 -0040, 09- 29- 22 -43- 0024, and 09- 29 -22 -43 -0002 as stated herein. Deny all other appeals. An application for senior citizen deferment has been sent to the owner of 09- 29.22 -43 -0007 (90 -14 [4]). M'7•Ti ic Attachments c.f r xd 4d1 Y i l CITY OF l MAPL WOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 i DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 612-770-4550 September 22, 1992 J. W. Pugaczewski 445 Brooks Avenue E. Little Canada, Minnesota 55117 PROJECT 90 -14, ASSESSMENT APPEAL In your assessment appeal for City Project 90 -14 for your property on Leland and Duluth you state that the road is on your property. The existing street prior to storm sewer construction was on your property for a long period of time. When the storm sewer was built, removal and replacement of the existing street in its entirety was deemed to be the most cost - effective approach. The replacement pavement was placed in the same location The issue of either obtaining city ownership of this part of your property through adverse possession proceedings or buying additional right of way was not addressed at this time. At such time as the city undertakes a permanent street improvement is a more appropriate point to correct this situation. BRUCE A. IRISH, P.E. - ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER Ice Equal Opportunity- Employer 86-27 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM ' LARPENTEUR AVENUE, 35E TO EDGERTON PROJECT N0.86 -27 Address of Assessed ParcelSTlj /'y 241/E G , Property Identification Number: 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city cou to defer, revise or cance our assessment.,) This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a . ( Deferral of assessment b. {_ Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. ( Cancellation of assessment d. {, Revision of assessment Reason for the request: Print Name) ( (Date) Ifl `Tj J IC S 11 E s l 7l — lo 0 Address of Property Owner) Telephone AV t-4 U)00 0 zip 5511 7 z7 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM LARPENTEUR AVENUE, 3 5 E TO EDGERTON PROJECT NO. 86-27 J' z j - 7o -or zAddressofAssessedParcel Property Identification Number: 7 -z 1 -z 2 - -0 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. Cancellation of assessment d. (_j Revision of assessment Reason for the request: IF 6W V 2 aa444 e- -)V-5 Zf1fif ..*v 7 Print Name) (Signature) (Date) 47 O C / G Address of Property Owner) Telephone zip 4 16YI0 i r t t:aa it V D rSr- P 1 1. 1992 1 September 11, 1992 Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk City of Maplewood 1.830 E. County Road S Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re Notice of Appeal Project No. 86 -27 PIN 17- 29 -22 -33 -0036 Dear Ms. Aurelius G I, Donna F. Pinotti, hereby appeal the street and storm sewer assessments proposed by the attached Statement of Assessment mailed to me on August 25, 1992. I seek an abatement of the assessments on the following grounds: 1. These alleged improvements did not increase the value of my property. 2. The county is paying for all curb, gutter, and storm sewer improvements relative to any and all propertyPY owners abutting Larpenteur Avenue, 3. The only curb, gutter, and storm sewer assessment to be paid by the city of Maplewood, are for those properties that do not abut Larpenteur Avenue. 40 As a result, any assessment against my property would be a double taxation. 5. The city of Maplewood has a standard policy of assessing a flat rate on assessments for those properties upon which the city pays for the assessment. In this case the county is paying for the bill, therefore, the city has no jurisdiction to assess any sums of money for any improvements. Very truly yours, r ' Donna F. Pinotti mono CITY OF 1•AP 1830 Em COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, 141141•JESOT-A 55109 DEVIARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS E!'07- n'O'F FEE M E-:: V4 Tr C3 1= 9=6 ES E; FEE E; E; M EE " Ir D/P NC]. 6004 PROJECT NOm 86-27 LARPENTEUR.AV-35E TO EDO THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE IT IS IMPORTANT •l-iAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGtITS AND OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING Tl-iIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE ATTACt4ED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT VIEARING. YOUR ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL I DENT IFI CAT IOM tK01BER 17-29-22-33-0036 IS PIC.) FOLLOWS: STREETS—RESIDENTIAL UHITS AT $1 EACII == *-)i**$10 STORtirl SEWER—RESIDENTIAL UNITS AT **$500.000 EACH = ***X*x$'-_3500vE"Z' STREETS—COMMERCIAL F. F. AT STORM SEWER COPIMERCIAL S.F. AT WATER SERVICE—RESIDENTIAL AT SEWER SERVICE—RESI DENT I(IL AT 15,e'OO EnCtl it x * $ 04, 100 EACI I m x x x x x x x $ 0, 00 750*000 EACH 47550,000 EACII =: * * X X ii A X )i t1b. V)-17j YOUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL IS WHEN REQUEST INCB INFORMATION OR CORRESPONDING ABOUT THIS STATEMENT, PLEASE REFER TO PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER NOTE au OBJECTIONS TO TilIS ASSESSMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL TliF_ CLOSE or -riii-:. A51,5EGG111ENT 11EARINGs ABSOLUTELY NO 013JECTIONS (ORAL OR IN WRIT1110) TO f"(1Rl- OF TI-IIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE I)-CC[:['-TED B TVIE CITY CLERK. OR THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COU114CIL AFTER Tl•lE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT 11EARING, 9-14-92 4m ft. m w -m u. w 4w so 10. 0. m Im Im im w es w w w 0- a- a& 4m dw DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOLJR PAMT D/P NO. 6004 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT NOe 86-27 LARPENTEUR AV-35E TO EDG PIN 17-29-22-33-0036 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ****$1 TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - $ PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHORIZED. ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM 67ft O ROSELAWN, RICE TO JACKSON PROJECT N0.87 -01 Address of Assessed Parcel 0 g ' L G • Property Identification Number: lv%a` 400. 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. Q<— Revision of assessment Reason for the request: WM3 6 id a x.Y D..1t.. .o,/a . ltia s.,. 4 ve. A102 ftAOU4 0:kgx" & &ja0V%. P si a re) (Date) CP of Address of Property Owner) Telephone Zip ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM ROSELAWN, RICE TO JACKSON PROJECT N0.87 -01 Address of Assessed Parcel Iq i.L Property identification Number: 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (_) W) Yes No Please complete this fora if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_j Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. Revision of assessment Reason for the request: / / A 14wan =fed c}' lix q P [Gf eGf Lao 7 ./q, rl 2, SfreC`- coaawlrr a/ FF fo +y ti q t - V1W Is610' 47o 04 i Dal Se Print Name) ( signature) (Date) lopOD : l! rte!. 1 .- tf Address of Propvty Owner) Telephone Zip Out to< b tz 4#7 s Of 0 ceJce xrnetrQec, (RwKs r ro ecT No, o " O 1 Z. 21-z2 -t3- 0 01 Z L of__owht5 u _t4 _ _4 ve__ o (u _ Qh (a4-5 t '- unlh — Lt SCP'. ._6ky( _ __ - - - - -- ASP IGss_ _1-e - 'Th -f_ - - -FPS oh 5J t ahsi_nera __ _y -- Tr deV o rr__ - -w cl-- ___P_eJ fh th vflo _jh p W-4 hrXeCTCd. (o 43 _ 1_h _' _. PVeJ Gith _ 0 C 4kc ho h .PVedeh_ oh se ,ueh4i y. , _v leFS a f _ _ _fie 16s s, c Ioh_ _ SqId._ _.Qhy_ b _ 455C55 rc ( q-ff# 7fhTS----- d--- ___rC - - - -_. cuhl of__ dime Qer e _ deV c M eh + o},eIPJ _-or - M YccFehTs - - -o Or K, e r Y. _ - - - -- 5.— --015.e eel, rdUCnIhT -- - - - - -- a e(v tv _ _sirs ew_ e . hOUSP 1N1' ___ Thf__ I ar .- _ cJC _ W fr e lh _ e f QSSiItiah. _ Tha] Tt slivt _ 5_Y s7 ekr Wd5 kc+rd_ k,.I'(e -of 4 e Lof -- wev e tok a -t 4( .7A 4 1 4e jar el- 4U5. -- ofr1(htyf.--- hfordTloh.- - - - - -- k(t4 etd --- o r-.. 4: a f t f ke h k at-Yvk k e c t. f i 1. rte_- +d..r.:.r_......._,. NL tz PIPto err..__ ._._. ......._. .. +. _ ...r_..._..._.. 4eAloo Ij t 1t f 1 R Ct t t l k i f s i. i i -- ...- . + . __ , ........_..._'_-- -'--ter_- ..._.r...- ........_ _._ --- •_.. r......._...__- _.....__.— ..._.._. -• -- ----_ ---_ . --- _ -._...____.. .... _ ._... l tea..... . 1 r...._._ -_.._. _ .._rte• __. __ -•_ __.._._.......__— ....- ___._.._ _. .. •._. _._ ._._..— _.._......_..... . _ ..... -_.-. _- ,_..... . -_-..• .._.___..__.._.. .. .._ ......__.. ._,.,. .. ._. __ . -,._.. ...- t i- t r w ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 ( D Address of Assessed Parcel Z°I ,3 3 FPANK s r Property Identification Number: 7*9 am Z 7 ow 1 2o 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (_) Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) Co ( Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: NCr 56N6 R1Tro R.oa&X m off' 1 VzCR, APjA69W " I*- r NO pl2b Pa R'rlo Nit£' Ass6Tsr1-6WT V,40 A Print Name) / 6/)v - IWA14VC4 fIt lo/ff A I. , ,,, f, mb 47 (Sig tore) (Date) Address of Property Owner) 11 -rl, IM 8214(. - 1 Telephone Zi SY/o 1 g ZV ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel 2.RRq CaY LliS llkl% Property Identification Number: O- 2 f 3_ 00 2 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (_) Yes (gNo ) Please complete this form if you intend to appeal ' to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. j Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: AM 1N FIE 1 OF NAJN6 THE Lwb Ti Co. 12MirtLC tF T416 5D0 gSSES5MfN7' WAS ESCRt)t.JGD WltE1.1 T BDUr,4r M`( HOUsE. Er TINS MArTrX 11 Nal' 7xC- SoUlEp BY TA-6 TIME - nkE Amcss M-<4r rS DUE T acs l40 vcd PAY AW MY 1NTE2ESY TNA' MAY B6 4kAR.GC'! . bZt40*1 sa1 ALD m, / Pakkt4 911419a Print Name) (Signature) (D te) 2-q I R CqReY Firs . bg 6r? 1 490 -sD Address of Property Owner) Telephone HAPb5LO000 , H N zip 65'1 d °I ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel &a A e- Property Identification Number: 40 Z.. 12 d i n r) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. () Cancellation of assessment d. ( ) Revision of assessment 1!- 0 perty Owner) Date) 3 / Telephone Zip Reason for the request: ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE/WALTER STREET C7.PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel ePqq3 Property Identification Number: 12 diTif, umbe Do you wish to address the city council tonight? PYes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. ( Deferral of assessment b. ( Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. Cancellation of assessment d. _ Revision of assessment • - Reason for the request: 00 Q 9'D Print Name) (S i ure (Date) C1 C1 as ice 4FZ ZL Addr tp - - Tele ry) zip, S3;/o J_r I 2ia ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel .299 eA rev 9 b-A Property Identification Number: 12 alit nube ) _ i4 7 Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ( ; r4s. Vo Please complete this form if you. intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This fora must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. i`j Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: QS r b a / 0,C)Mn n 12fi1 ji47 Atelve f 4nA i op OfA t, v @UIL'C1 G/far's a, on v t - V a c i P Ir Ltk3GL SAY '"rfE' Qn,SEa ,SSSS/tivT, 6 - elve "MrH4-r- f / QP_ ve /u er-` /0° Print Name) (signature) (bat 2L Cate f' /W.( .c b Q-wa q-9 / b 7 Address PropjWty Owner) Telephone 611C C/ Mil zi /09 X41 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel Property Identification Number: 12 digit numbers Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This fora must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): n. (_) Deferral of assessment b. ( ) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) CID ( Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason ,for the ;equest: Ir Akoe,10 A r-*.. v%vo 5Lr Print Name) J/--- I- FV07~W --- fsmlya SIgnature) (Oate) LIZA *mo11-glo 5 16 rZ Address/of Property Owner) Telephone AX4 AA 9 4S qwrl V q zipJ - 7370 4 ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM 10BEAMAVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel_ 2a&J ,^7 Property Identification Number: 12 di number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. () Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: oAA4 _/1''t.(i it o. ..t .-JenACr Opt C • _r v i i ,I y Print Name j L gnature) (DbLte) Address of Property Owner) Telephone Iv 00Z) Zip ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM BEAM AVENUE/WALTER STREET t PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel Aa22-(nA..eey UtS 41 Property Identification Number: 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (_) Yes No Please complete this fora if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. ( Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) a. ,(E::j Cancellation of assessment d. (_} Revision of assessment Reason for the request: T '7b 20 JCcT AL60 - /-- (?LE V 6 A,2E ( Print'Name) (Signature) (Date) 9jo/:?l - Q--A--A Addre.gs of Property Owner) Telephone Zip S 14g_ ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM I V BEAM AVENUE /WALTER STREET PROJECT N0.88 -12 Address of Assessed Parcel Property Identification Number: 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (_) Cz Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council.to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form gust be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close.of tonight's ci council assessment hearing. Your request w become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_j Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) C* ( Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: a Print ame) (signature) (Date) C>?eNow14, Z-/ el- Elt/ A/s Address of Property Owner) Telephone zip September 8 , 1992 owl O City of Maplewood /Department of Public Works 1830 East County Road B. Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 ATTENTION: City Clerk, City of Maplewood n V=T w - -- i i • LtRE S Sf19 , 2 am am Improvement Name: CORDB 90 -14 Improvement Number: 6095 Parcel ID #: 09- 29 -22 -43 -0024 Property Description: Clifton Addition Ramsey Co., Minn Subj to Rds the W172ft E 436 ft of Blk 4 I, Judith E. Mullin, with this written letter is objecting to the attached copy of "Statement of Assessment" on the above owned stated parcel of property. My objection to above assessment is due to an amount i equaling anqgassessedfour (4) units on said property. It s my understandinginworkingwiththeCityofMaplewoodinAu -Jul Y g ust 1985 that - two (2) of the units were not buildable due to the angledplacementoftheWilliamsBrothersPipeline. In lieu of the information I received regarding set - backs, P lacement of structure distance from pipeline and lot lines, I feel the assess- ment for four (4) residential units due to Storm Sewer Improve-ment Project 90 -14 is not applicable. I will await correspondence in the above matter and thank you in advance for your information regarding this written appeal. Sing ely, v ud'th E. Mu in 5612 Whited Avenue Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 937 -0588 C . Y OF MAFLEWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROA MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 •+ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORMS • STAT'EI+ Ei T OF ASSESSMENT' ' D /Fl ND. 6095 PROJECT NO& 90 - 14 COUNTY RD B STORM SEWER ' THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE a ET IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS MNCERNING THIS ASSESSMENT AS STATED ON THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT iERRI NG. • R. :ASSESSMENT - -FOR PARCEL IDENTIFICATION - NUMBER 09-m29 22 024 IS. -AS FOLLOWS s 4. 000 STORM SEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS AT **$500a 000 EACH = 00 0. 000 STORM SEW COMMERCIAL SF AT 100 EACH = 00 0.0.00 STORM SEW SPECIAL SF AT *** *$0.025 EACH 00 MUR TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL. IS r 4HEN REQUESTI INFORMATION O CORRESPO ABOUT THIS STATEMENT, PLEASE REFER ra PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 09-29-22-43-0024, • 43TE: OBJECTIONS TO THIt ' ASSESSOMENT WILL FEE ACCEPTED UNTIL. THE CLOSE OF THE ISSESSMENT HEARING ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS (ORAL OR IN WRITING) TO ANY FART 3F THIS ASSESSMENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY CLERK OR THE 4APLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE - - $ASSESSMENT #••TEARING, fl - i b -92 w r r r r . r r r r r r r r r , _ .. ..sue . .}. . BETADi AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YU PAYIENT • D/P NO. 6095 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PROJECT NDw 90 -14 COUNTY RD B STORM SEWER . PIN 89 - 29- 22 -43- 1024 TOTAL ASSESSMENT TOTAL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT AS AUTHOR I ZED. ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM TH 61- COUNTY ROAD B STORM SEWER PROJE N0.90 -14 ., Address of Assessed Parcel l Property Identification Humber: I Z )/ 3 - 6 0 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your requestwillbecomepartofthepublichearingrecord. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) CID Cancellation of assessment d. (_j Revision of assessment Reason for the request: P Pt Name) SigrC4ture) jDat T2 Address of Property Owner) Telephone 1'1 e C'a 4 a aka Zip 06 r 2- 0j RECENE D-) ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM SEP V 1,9 92 PROJECT NOo 90 -14 ___.. Address of Assessed Parcel_ Do L,., VrH S T Property Identification Number. 4 - o 0 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? (..) (E) Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_) Deferral of assessment b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) CIO (_) Cancellation of assessment d. &) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: P Z: E ffr/ L L 6T S Li T, 'l S D I! L y C SET O/1l S lL O F' flD Ste' SMOG L .& 1. J&P nnrN L - y y - s - 9 . Print Name) ( gn ure) (Date) 111) 1, Vr#,s7 Address of Property Owner) Telephone Jft PC •W'oo1 /Xt /(,,( ZiP_ 3"SI o j f ASSESSMENT HEAI2ING APPEAL FORM Nl TH 61- COUNTY ROAD B STORM SEWER PROJECT N0.90 -14 Address o ssessed Parcel 11 1 Cam• /'Q 4e, Property Identification Number: ammon ANSI 12 digit number) Do you wish to address the city council tonight? ( ) (_) Yes No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the citycounciltodefer, revise or cancel our assessment. This formrm trust be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your requestgqt will become part of the public hearin g record. I request that the city council consider (check one): a. (_j Deferral of assessment b. (T) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. (_) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: lOc1SFi OfJ f/'DT! 1 d .P/DT //!/T.v/J LiTTif G /lsDi S,7409, 0V C. il Print r fvlee Name) 'ign 59T _ 1l /3 f- Address of Property Owner) Telephone BOND 9 -9- 5z Date) Z22 P — 55io9 c 1%7 Monday September 14, 1992 City clerk of the City of Maplewood City of Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Pacel Identifcation Number 09 -29 -22-43 -0034 City Clerk: r 07 A 07 '02, -A- 90 & Mark and Lea Enfield 2160 Day Road Maplewood, MN 55109 go aw (LI I (D We are writing this letter in regards to the assessment of $500.00 place upon us for the adoption of the assessment roll for Public Improvement Project 90 -14, TH 61- County Road B Storm Sewer. It is our intention to appeal this assessment for the following reasons stated below: 10 We did not live in the assessed area of Maplewood, Minnesota when the adoption of the improvement project was decided upon. Therefore, our right to voice our opinion concerning the improvement project was not heard. 2. We have been assessed an increase in our property tax, by the City of Maplewood, of $500.00, after three months from the purchase of our house at 2160 Day Road. Our property taxes have continued to be based upon misinformation about the value of our property. 3. The assessment of $500.00 would be a financial burden to our household based upon other City imposed tax increases; namely due to item #2 above. And, because we are a single income family with one of us currently enrolled at a local college. It is for the forestated reasons we seek an appeal and deferment of the $500.00 that the City of Maplewood has placed upon us. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark R. nfield ra lea Enfield go 3 ) AN 1 KAY A. FFHgt 1237 1-A RD MAPLE K/ MNf 551(X) Ellie IfaPfetuo 7y4 6aoreiZ WW&A. rn ,sso9 90 -1 1 e. t,(Ida( euv ' . tcrt [,cfriG'q,,,C.. aa. vur c.uzy. 2xZ -- xs2 aar 1cccG due .ta ,tic. 00('''.an7 • .ka aye 4u + iaue eAOt c¢ivcL Ptu- kr,CC.r.aanL a.rd ) dce`Ja 2,rrr.- red,tcuJ JEW up- low-- 5373 6r tixe G' s- i ,tom W e or rd'i tip W I I At let A s - i. i J AIO W. W) J 1ir InECEVED IllpJoI AUG 28 19$Z ol moll ol camdow- OAIV TDD_ d d op 4C 4000oz, AOT4 lilt o i 5 0 0- 00 .. 7, ZL 2 7. w, f /_- ee ate` tA CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 3018 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOQ, MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS D/P NO. 6095 THIS IS THE ONLY STATEMENT YOU WILL RECEIVE T lS IMP TANT THAT YOU 'READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND YOUR RIGHTS AND OBLlGATlOm ONCERNINTHIS ASSESMENT A ETAED ON THE ATTACHED NOTICE OF ASSESMENT ARlWG. UUR ASSESMENT FOR PARCEL IDENTIFlCATION NUMBER 09-29-22-44-0111 IS A".3 FOLLU: STORM SEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS AT **$500"000 EACH 0 5URM 6EW COMMERCIAL SF AT ****$0.100 EACH = 0,.0Ot 0 STURM SEW SPECIAL SF AT ****$0.025 EACH = YOUR[O7AL ASSESSMENT FOR THIS PARCEL%ru--t_-- v F£UJESTING lNFORATION OR CORRESPONDING AUT THI STATMENT REFE U PARCEi IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 09-29-22-44-0111. TEx OBJECTIONS TO THIS ASSESSMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED UNTIL THE CLOSE OF TrlE SESMENT HEARING" ABSOLUTELY NO OBJECTIONS ORAL OR - 'N WRITING) TO ANY RT uF THIS ASE' MENT STATEMENT WILL BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY CLERK OR THE X MAPLEQOD CITY COUNCIL TER THE CLOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT HEARING, 5-14-9c_' D[TACM AND RETUR6 TMB PORI ION WlTH YOUR ;lf4YKENT D/8z NO~ 6095 ASSESSMENT PAYMENT for PIN 09-29-"22-44-60111 701'AL PAYMENT ENCLOSED - PROJECT NO. 90-14 COUNTY RD B STORM SEWER PARTIAL PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT PS AUTHDRIZED~ City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: DIP No. 6095 Project No. 90 -14 County Road B Storm Sewer Re: Property ID No. 09- 29 -22 -42 -0009 Gentlemen: o -ty it This.is a formal protest to the proposed assessment above referred to, and constitutes an objection to the assessment referred to, on the part of all the undersigned interested parties. This is a protest and appeal as to the entire proposed assessment. The proposed project is of absolutely no value to the property involved. This is also intended as an appeal in the event the protest is not allowed and approved, and is an appeal under MSA Sec. 435.193 to 435.195. This protest and appeal is on behalf of: a) Owners: Peter J. Schmelz and Jane F. Schmelz and Samuel D. Finkelstein as Trustees, and by Countryside Volkswagen, Inc. (Countryside Motors, Inc.), Lessee. Kindly so note your files. Very truly yours, Samuel D. Finkelstein and Jane F hmelz as Trustees By E-' S uel D. Finkelstein Trustee and Owner Peter J.,S elz, Owner By: .. Safnuel D./Finkelstein Attorney for Peter J. Schmelz I Dated: September , 1992 Countryside Volkswagen, Inc. Countryside- otors , Inc.), Lessee By ..- Samu . Finkelstein Vice President of Lessee 40:r- 3 AGENDA REPORT Action by Council .41 Endorsed. To: City Manager Michael McGuire Modified From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. Collins ect : Request to Fill Full-Time Police Officer Position:Red ected,.Sub J q DateDate: September 18, 1992 Introduction The 1992 approved budget included the hiring of a full -time Police Officer after August 1, 1992. It is our plan to fill this position with a current part -time Police Officer who is also a certified Paramedic. Recommendation Permission be granted to fill this full-time Police Officer position. Action Requite Submit to the City Council for their review and approval. KVC :js Action by C OUnnOil a' e ®rsed - Modif -o - R Date hffLL 11OS LAKf. s t. R LA L , MWIP RE RES£Nt tvfP goo N : Rd Laecc stNo. 131 ocK c.Cub 1. 1 i I 1 / r i f r JL nu) l m a Q Toom a MEMORANDUM TO.City Managerg Actionon B C ° ' c ®PROM:Thomas Ekstrand Associate Planner SUBJECT:Parking Design Approval and Site Plan Change Endorsed LOCATION:3001 White Bear Avenue Modified... APPLICANT:Corporate Property Investors Raj ecte PROJECT Maplewood Mall Addition fit® DATE:August 21, 1992 INTR.ODUCTTON 1. Corporate Property Investors (CPI) is asking that the City Council approve their plans to restripe the Maplewood Mall - parking lot. The parking lot is striped mostly with nine -foot -wide spaces at a 60 degree angle. There is a small amount of 90- degree parking. They want to restripe the lot with nine- foot -wide spaces at a, 75- degree angle. The Code requires 10- foot -wide spaces for 45, 60 or 90 degree parking. The Code does not allow any other striping angle. The Code does allow the City Council to approve other designs. If the City does not approve this striping plan, CPI would need to build a parking deck to provide enough parking for the Penney''s addition. Refer to the letter on page 7. CPI can provide 133 spaces over the required amount by changing the striping angle to 75- degrees. 2. CPI is also asking that the City Council approve the revised site plan. The revised site plan drops the parking deck proposed with the previous plan. The new site plan does show areas for future parking decks and building. BACKGROUND On January 28, 1992, the Community Design Review Board approved plans for the Penney's addition and a parking deck. Section 36-22(b) of City Code states the City's parking space requirements. These requirements are limited to 90, 60 and 45 degree parking with ten - foot -wide spaces for businesses with high turn -over customers, such as shopping centers. The Code allows the City Council to approve other standards. DISCUSSION I do not see any problem with the 75- degree parking. There is a problem with nine- foot -wide stalls. The intent of the Code is to provide ten - foot -wide stalls. The reason for this requirement is to minimize banging car doors, especially with people carrying packages. The Mall, however, has had nine- foot -wide stalls for many years. They would have to build a parking ramp to provide ten- foot -wide stalls. A reasonable. compromise would be to put the Mall on notice that the City may require restriping to ten - foot -wide spaces with future additions. The Mall will have to provide parking ramps for future additions. If the City is still requiring ten -foot -wide stalls, this would be a good time to switch to wider stalls. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the use of nine- foot -wide parking spaces at a 75- degree angle for the Maplewood Mall, because: a. The Mall is currently striped with nine- foot -wide stalls. b. There is not enough room for additional parking, without building a parking ramp. Approval is subject to the following condition: The City may require that the Mall restripe their parking to ten - foot -wide stalls when the Mall proposes to build parking ramps. 2. Approve the site plan that the City has stamped August 3, 1992 for the Penney's addition and Mall parking lot, Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: (I have crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions to the January 28, 1992 conditions of approval.) a. Repeat this review after two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. b. Restore and sod the boulevard along Southlawn Drive if damaged by the construction. C. Provide reflectorized stop signs at all exits and ahandicap- parking sign for each handicap- parking space. d. Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the City Engineer for approval. ge. Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all new landscaped areas. cif. Submit architectural plans for J.C. Penney's. E ig. Meet all requirements of the Fire Marshal for dire lanes. RI NT ".1 w r w I g M 1 . • ^5 a , I. . 1 w w w. w. . w r r w r It sj FA h • w kh. Submit cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work not completed by occupancy. The amount of escrow required shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The City must approve an agreement from Corporate Properly Investors granting the City permission to complete any unfinished work. i. This action does not include Mroval of future parking decks or buildins . mb\mem \mapmall.cup go \b- 3:mapmall.cup (Section 2, north 1/2) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Proposed Site Plan 4. Letter of Justification dated August 3, 1992 5. Plans stamped August 3, 1992 (separate attachment)/ 3 ey9 ( cc Cc A P/a or ob 1 9 I & ( 2) PRI vA rr smErr AXSSABI AV) NORM SA IN T 4E LA RIE RD DD W 0 R 44 Or LOCATION MAP HTS I.. - - Za KOHLMANd AV 4 roI =-- LOLr zN- 4w44JC CONNOR A W N AV B 81 RD WHITE BEAR LAKE 4 Attachment 1 COUNTY ROAD D sw V, L ;4 I r 10 • Otl tot s r, L •O•tif•..w . O.• . [ >w - 1 it t r N i . t : N.•, • tN .•• .11.7•. t • f • r f.L • t.1L • • t 4r M•,• 40 1 •..• 4 •« M . ..•+.jai ` fi• I' ..... . w... 1 , I r,•• • V PROPOSED •,r MAL L EXPANSION W& MAPLEWOOD _ h MALL PROPOSED Ju-PENNYS X-Y id w . r0')O M I M N • sb 0 Z s • i PROPERTY LINE MAP 5 Attachment 2 4 N I 91. rr / I A \ X a z D i C1 n> C r MZ 0 Zi uric„ fm Z m D ° o T) 1 to -1 a - I r r I m 1v Mx H b Y u 14 1A N N4 -1 1 VO ¢ sr rs s v a s a rn M 22 29 7 c y r J ./ 19 ~ i2 u m 8 — M Z N g m r z M v j r g' 1 Z; 1 N l i YN ffnlff« JAI ( I.YOIA AVE " y M L. or a ZZL ® i --- -- - - - - - _ ^ 1 g441" .1 N rS DQ O c , . I3t* r ; 1 V 0 _ u )N• SIOEwAI.K iD9 . i1CKA E IaRie(uP u -- ` I S 3 r 34 io 1 -.rn 0~ ' 1i to ItoLZ_— N a- ---- / Ia 30 _ t m D x 13 r , 0 25 M g I! r ' • z n 1 1 3 t ' • RUR\ r w \ \ \z 12 = g 10 I n= w7G 19 W + N _ a D 1 mr 20 v as ~ M mr I D m N w, < - •NIA C$ K L3 z v1 a2s - 'z H! BEAM AVENUE COMMERCIAL I ooDC M -+ a Lar COS IIt Q rn AUG 0 3 M2 SITE PLAN PROPOSED) Attachment 3 4 N E RECEIVED 2 3 1992 3 Maplewood Mail Maplewood Mall is a regional shopping center located in Maplewood, Minnesota at the intersection of White Bear Avenue and Beam Avenue. Maplewood is currently anchored by three department stores: Carson Pirie Scott, Kohl's and Sears Roebuck & Co. Plans are underway to add JCPenney as a fourth department store. The addition of Penney to Maplewood is important for a number of reasons. Firstly, the new store will add to the array of merchandise offered to Maplewood Mall shoppers giving them a greater selection to choose from. Secondly, in an increasingly competitive market, Penney will help to reinforce Maplewood's position in the region. The Mall of America, the newly renovated Rosedale Shopping Center and countless strip center developments that have opened throughout the region are all seeking to draw away Maplewood "s shoppers. Finally, the expansion will benefit the City of Maplewood by generating additional employment and adding to its tax base. As it stands today, Maplewood is 770,000 square feet, substantially smaller than most of the other regional malls in th Twin Cities area. The new Penney store will be 124,000 square feet on two levels. A small, 20,000 square foot addition to the mall will provide a transition from the existing buildings to the Penney store. ..Following completion of construction, the enlarged mall will be 914,000 square foot. Maplewood Mall currently has 4,345 parking spaces, slightly in excess of the City zoning requirement. Parking fields surrounding the mall buildings are comprised of one -way aisles with parking stalls 9 feet wide, angled at 60 The expansion will create the need for 717 spaces in addition to replacing those lost under the new buildings. The existing surplus of parking will make up some of this requirement and an undeveloped area west of the Kohl's store will provide room for 295 new spaces. The balance of the additional parking requirement can be satisfied by slightly modifying the present design. If the stall width is maintained at 9 feet but the angle of parking stalls is changed to 75 the efficiency is improved and there is about a 6% increase in the number of parking spaces. The result is a total of 4,634 parking spaces for the center, a ratio of 5.15 stalls per 1,000 square feet of floor area. The applicant understands that the proposed design deviates slightly from the City standard. However, the design is closely in conformance with what has worked successfully at Maplewood since it opened. The only alternative way to provide additional parking is the construction of a parking garage. While this has been considered, the cost of a parking structure is prohibitive. The proposed 75 7 Attahcment 4 design was recently implemented and is now successfully being used at Southdale and Rosedale Shopping Center. A similar design has been in operation at Burnsville Center for a number of years. The applicant is confident that it will also work successfully at Maplewood and respectfully requests City Council approval. Maplewoo.jms Community Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 8 -25 -92 The amended moti wa voted on as follows: Ayes - -Moe, on, Ho Robinson, Thompson b. Site Plan Revision and Conditional Use Permit - Corporate Property Investors, Maplewood Mall James Selanec was present representing Corporate Property Investors. He explained their request to restripe the lot with nine- foot -wide stalls at a 75- degree angle. Mr. Selanec discussed with the Board the different angular designs considered for parking stalls. Mr. Selanec said any future expansion of the Mall would be seriously affected if the City requires ten - foot -wide stalls for a future expansion instead of the existing nine- foot -wide stalls. Gary Jackson, General Manager of the Mall, said the manager of the Rosedale shopping mall has not had any complaints on the similar restri in design of thatPPg parking lot. Boardmember Thompson moved the Review Board recommend: 1) Approval of the use of nine- foot -wide parking spaces at a 75- degree angle for the Maplewood Mall, because: a) The Mall is currently striped with nine- foot -wide stalls. b) There is not enough room for additional parking, without building a parking ramp. Approval is subject to the following condition: The City may require that the Mall restripe their parking to ten - foot -wide stalls when the Mall proposes to build parking ramps. 2) Approval of the site plan that the City has stamped August 3, 1992 for the Penns addition and Mall parking lot. Approval is subject to the applicant doing the following: a) Repeat this review after two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. b) Restore and sod the boulevard along Southlawn Drive if damaged by the construction. c) Provide reflectorized stop signs at all emits and ahandicap - parking sign for each handicap - parking space. Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes of 8 -25 - 92 d) Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan to the City Engineer for approval. e) Install an in- ground lawn irrigation system for all new landscaped areas. fl Submit architectural plans for J. C. Penney's. g) Meet all requirements of the Fire Marshal for fire lanes. h) Submit cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work not completed by occupancy. The amount of escrow required shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The City must approve an agreement from Corporate Property Investors granting. the City permission to complete any unfinished work. i) This .action does not include approval of future parking decks or building. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson c) Clarification of Condition and Building ElevaReview- Fleming Auto Service Staff aske Nshing rd for clarPio5 condition 11 which requires building elevations brick acce submitted for both Board and staff approval. rd decided tndition should be subject only to staff approval. Boardmember Ro ;bn ved to eliminate the first sentence of Condition 11 of the May 28, 199 Board minutes. Boardmember Thon se nded Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson 7. VISITOR PRESENTA,,?`IONS There were no vjs`itor presentations. 8. BOARD PRF.BENTATIONS There were no Board presentations. 1 TOW s MEMORANDUM ft a, TO: City Manager ndors ed.. FROM: Director of Community Development Modified,.. SUBJECT: Tax-Exempt Financing -- HealthEast Rejected,,... DATE: September 18, 1992 Date INTRODUCTION HealthEast is requesting that the City approve an increase in the amount of tax- exempt bond refinancing for HealthEast. The increase would be from $ to 150, 000, 000. The Council approved the $111,000 in July. HealthEast will use the proceeds from these bonds to refinance current debt. HealthEast is requesting that the City approve this financing so the bond interest will be tax- exempt. The St. Paul HRA will issue these bonds for five hospitals, including St. John's Northeast. Maplewood must approve the financing because the bond issue includes St. John's Hospital. BACKGROUND The City Council approved tax - exempt financing for St. John's Northeast Hospital in 1982, 1987 and 1991. On July 13, 1992, the Council approved $111,000,000 in bond refinancing. DISCUSSION This request meets the City's requirements for tax - exempt financing. The City is not liable for this financing. The City will receive an administrative fee of $22,610 at the bond closing. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached resolution and consent agreement. ga \b- 3:Hea1thE2.mem (3) Attachments: Resolution and Consent Agreement RESOLUTION NO.- RESOLUTION AMENDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR A REFINANCING PROJECT AND RATIFYING THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD HealthEast Obligated Group Project) It is hereby found, determined and declared: WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") - and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota (the "HRA") are authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 46,9.1651, the Municipal Industrial Development Act, (the "Act" ) to issue hea 1 th care f ac i 1 ity revenue bonds to finance properties, real or personal, whether or not now in existence, used or useful in connection with a revenue-producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services and to refund revenue bonds previously issued by the HRA for such purposes; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 1992 the City Council of the City (the Council "), acting at the request of HealthEast, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (both HealthEast or any affiliate thereof shall hereafter be referred as the "Borrower"),, passed a resolution entitled Resolution Reciting a Proposal for a Refinancing Project and Giving Approval to the Project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (the "Preliminaryy Resolution and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Preliminary Resolution, the Council gave its preliminary approval to the Borrower's proposal that the City and the HRA enter into a consent agreement (the "Consent Agreement ") under the Act pursuant to which the HRA would issue health care facility revenue bonds (the "Bonds") to refund certain revenue bonds (the "Prior Bonds") previously issued by the HRA and to (i) finance the acquisition, construction and installation of hospital and related health care facilities, including land building improvements and equipment and other movable personal property acquired and to be acquired by the Borrower or wholly - Owned subsidiary or affiliate of the Borrower and located at or used in connection with existing facilities maintained by the Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of the Borrower in the Cities of Maplewood and Saint Paul and (ii) to pay expenses incurred in the issuance of the Bonds; and 225298 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Preliminary Resolution, the Council gave preliminary approval to the Borrower's proposal that the HRA iissuetheBonds n the total maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $111,000,000; and the Council also gave preliminary approval to the Borrower'.s proposal that the Borrower enter into a revenue agreement (the "Revenue Agreement ") with the HRA pursuant to which the Borrower will be obligated to make payments at the times and in the amounts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and all costs and expenses of the City and the HRA incident to the issuance and sale of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City, the HRA and the Borrower have agreed to increase the total maximum aggregate principal amount of the Bonds from approximately $111,000,000 to approximately $150,000,000; and use no more than $12,000,000 of the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds to finance the acquisition and construction of improvements and equipment for health care facilities located in the Cities, and the remainder of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds shall be used to refund the Prior Bonds, said combined financing purpose being herein called the "Project "; and WHEREAS , the undertaking of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds to finance the cost thereof will further promote the public purposes and legislative objectives of the Act by providing substantial inducement for the continuation of the Borrower's health care operations in Maplewood and Saint Paul; and WHEREAS, neither the full faith and credit of the Cities, nor the full faith and credit of the HRA will be pledged or responsible for the Project or for the payment of the principal of , premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the HRA in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended published a Notice of Hearing, a copy of which with proof of publication is on file in the offices of the City of Saint Paul Department of Planning and Economic Development, of the public hearing on the Borrower' s proposal that the HRA, acting pursuant to the Consent Agreement, undertake the Project and the HRA did conduct a public hearing pursuant to said Notice on September 22, 1992 at which public hearing all persons appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the Borrower's proposal which notice, publication and hearing are hereby in all respects ratified; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on September 22, 19 9 2 , the HRA adopted a resolution (the "Bond Resolution ") authorizing issuance of the Bonds; 225298 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota as follows: 10 Subject to the provisions in paragraph 3 below, the Council hereby approves the Borrower's proposal that the HRA, acting pursuant to the Bond Resolution and the Consent Agreement, issue the Bonds in one or. more series pursuant to the Act in the total maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $150,000,000 in order to finance the Project, and enter into the Revenue Agreement upon such terms and conditions, with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary.. so as to obligate the Borrower to make payments at the times and in the amounts sufficient to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of and interest on the Bonds. 2* The Council hereby ratifies the actions taken by the HRA in publishing the Notice of Hearing and conducting the public hearing on the Borrower's Bond Resolution and the Proposal and the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the Consent Agreement on behalf of both the HRA and the City, 3. In order to satisfy the requirements of Minnesota Law with respect to that portion of the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds which will be used to finance the construction of _improvements or equipment for health care facilities located in the City of Maplewood (and not to refund the Prior Bonds) , the Council rat if ies the actions taken by the Council staff , with the assistance of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, Bond Counsel to the City, in publishing a Notice of Hearing for a public hearing on the Project; 49 The Mayor and Clerk of the City of Maplewood are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and execute on behalf of the City an amended Consent Agreement for the Project in substantially the form presented at this meeting. 59 This Resolution shall repeal and supersede the Preliminary Resolution. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 28th day of September, 1992, 225298 3 HealthEast AMENDED CONSENT AGREEMENT FOR THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE BENEFIT OF HEALTHEAST THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as-of the day of by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, the "HRA"), a body corporate and politic organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") , a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1. Statement of Purpose and Powers to be Exercised Under the enactment by the Minnesota Legislature of Chapter 469.152 -1651 of the Minnesota Statutes, which is cited as the "Municipal Industrial Development Act" (the "Act ") , the HRA and the City are each authorized to issue revenue bonds, to make all contracts necessary or convenient in the exercise of the powers granted to it under the Act and to enter into intergovern- mental agreements relating to, among other things, the financing of projects under the Act, In accordance with the Act, HealthEast (the "Borrower "), on behalf of itself and other members of the Obligated Group has proposed that the HRA and the City enter into a consent agreement under the Act pursuant to which the HRA would issue revenue bonds 225295 the "Revenue Bonds ") to (i) finance and refund certain revenue bonds (the "Prior Bonds ") previously issued by the HRA to finance, the acquisition and installation of hospital and related health care facilities, including land, buildings, improvements and equipment and other movable personal property acquired or to be acquired by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower and located at, or used in connection with, existing facilities maintained by Borrower or a subsidiary or affiliate of Borrower in the City of Saint Paul or the City of Maplewood, and (ii) to pay related issuance expenses (collectively the "Project "). The undertaking of the Project and the issuance of the Revenue Bonds for that purpose is authorized by the Act and will further promote the public purposes and legislative objectives of the Act by providing substantial inducement for the continuation and -improvement of the health care operations of the Borrower and affiliates thereof in the Cities of South St. Paul, St. Paul and Maplewood. The powers to be exercised by the HRA under this Agreement are those identical powers conferred upon the City of Maplewood in the Act and in particular the power of the HRA to issue the Revenue Bonds to finance the Refinancing Project. 2 . Method by Achieving Purpose ; Manner of Exercising Power. The HRA and the City Council of the City of Maplewood have each adopted a resolution approving the proposal and authorizing the issuance of the Revenue Bonds by the HRA pursuant to this Agreement, in an amount not to exceed approximately 225295 2 150,000,000 to finance the Project. The HRA shall exercise the powers of the Act by adopting, approving and executing such resolutions, documents, and agreements (including the - Interlocal Agreement) as shall be necessary or convenient to issue and sell the Revenue Bonds and such other resolutions, documents and agreements as shall be necessary or required in connection with the loan of the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds and the giving effect to or carrying out the provisions of the agreements and other documents under which the Revenue Bonds are issued and /or secured, Said Revenue Bonds shall not be deemed issued on behalf of the City of Maplewood, and accordingly the HRA shall be solely responsible for the issuance of the Revenue Bonds as herein provided and may take such action as it deems appropriate for such purpose without further action being taken by the City of Maplewood. 3. Source and Contribution of Funds: Allocation of Funds. The source of funds to finance the Refinancing Project shall be the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds, and, if necessary, a contribution to be made by the Borrower. These funds shall be allocated towards the refunding of revenue bonds previously issued by the HRA to finance hospital and related healthcare facilities located in the Cities in a manner consistent with the Notice of Hearing attached hereto as Exhibit A. 4. Nature of Revenue Bonds The Revenue Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of the HRA payable solely from proceeds, revenues and other amounts pledged thereto and more 225245 3 fully described in the agreement or agreements under which the Revenue Bonds are issued (the "Bond Documents "). The Revenue Bonds and the interest thereon shall neither constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability, general or moral obligation or a pledge of the full faith or loan of credit of the HRA, the City of Saint Paul or the City of Maplewood, within the meaning of any Constitutional or statutory provisions. 5. Term of Agreement; Termination Unless otherwise provided by concurrent action of the HRA and the City of Maplewood, this Agreement shall terminate upon the retirement or defeasance of the last outstanding Revenue Bond, and this Agreement may not be terminated in advance of such retirement or defeasance . 6. Amendments This Agreement may be amended by the HRA and the City of Maplewood at any time. No amendment may impair the rights of the holders of the Revenue Bonds, unless such amendment is made in the manner provided for such amendment in the Bond Documents, 7. New Money Projects in Maulewood Bond proceeds may not be used to finance improvements to or equipment for health care facilities in the City of Maplewood (other than to refund Prior Bonds issued for such purpose) until the requirements of the Act with respect to such new money projects have been fully satisfied. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, has caused this 225295 4 Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its Chairman (or Vice - Chairman), Secretary, Executive Director and Director of Finance and Management Services; and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf by its Mayor and duly attested by its City Clerk; all as of the day and year first above written. Approved as to Form: Assistant City Attorney THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA By Its Chair By Its Secretary By Its Director of Finance and Management Services Amended Consent Agreement for the issuance of Revenue Bonds for HealthEast by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. 225295 5 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEAL) By Its Mayor Attested: By Its City Clerk Amended Consent Agreement for the issuance of Revenue Bonds for HealthEast by and between The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota and the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. 225295 6 BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 612) 224 -3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W. QUARNSTROM September 21, 1992 Mr. Marc J. Manderscheid Attorney at Law 2800 'World Trade Center 30 East 7th Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Thomas D. and Susan D. lope vs. City of Maplewood Dear Mr. Manderscheid: T000 V 4 Action by Council .-i Endors Modif i ed Rejecte Date FAX (612) 223-8019 Please find herein the proposed Stipulation of Settlement and Resolution. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. Patrick J. Kelly PJK: ks Enclosures Case Type: Assessment Appeal STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY Thomas D. Hope and Susan D. Hope, Plaintiffs, vs. City of Maplewood, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No. C1 -91- 013945 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT IN RE: APPEAL FROM LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOCAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. CH. 429 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , by and between THOMAS D. HOPE and SUSAN D. HOPE, (hereinafter "Hope ") and the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a . municipal corporation (hereinafter "City ") WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Maplewood Drainage Improvement Project, also known as Project 87 -32. WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §429 et al, Hope has filed a Notice of Appeal to' the $1.5,855.80 parcel assessment. WHEREAS, the Notice of Appeal for assessments was set for trial in Ramsey County District Court on Friday, September 11, 1992, as Case No. C1 -90- 013945. WHEREAS, the City and Hope entered into settlement negotiations in order to avoid continued litigation and costs. WHEREAS, the City and Hope have agreed to a reassessment in the amount of 8,750.00 per parcel to be levied for storm sewer upon the whole property described in the Notice of Assessment Appeals. WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement concerning the reassessment of the parcel. Hope agrees to waive the Notice of Hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071, Subd. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed upon that: 1) The City's reassessment for storm sewer on the property identified as PIN 10- 29 -22 -32 -0014, also known as 1.357 Cope Avenue shall be as follows: Assessment on .Parcel 10- 29 -22 -32 -0014 in the amount of $8,750.00. 2) That Hope hereby waives a Notice of Hearing for reassessment on the above- captioned parcel pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071, Subd. 2. 3) That Hope shall file with the Court a Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice and without Costs concerning Case No. C1 -91- 013945. 4) The City, by resolution, shall reassess the above- referenced parcel to $8,750.00. 5) Said reassessment shall be paid according to the original assessment notice and the City shall certify the reassessment to the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. b) That the City hereby releases any interest in the small pond located on the Hope parcel. THIS AGREEMENT consists of the agreement of the parties. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Dated: Patrick J. Kelly City Attorney THOMAS D. and SUSAN D. HOPE Dated: Marc Manderscheid, its Attorney F RESOLUTION NO, Project No. 87 -32 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and p assed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for construction of storm water drainage, also known as Project No. 87 -32, passed on October 14, 1991. WHEREAS, the assessment appeal was duly scheduled in Ramsey County District Court on September 11, 1992, . at 9:00 a.m. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and Thomas D. and Susan D. Hop e entered into a Stipulation of Settlement in order to avoid continued litigation and additional costs for a final determination of benefit. WHEREAS, Thomas D. and Susan D. Hope have agreed to a reassessment of its parcel, known as Parcel No. 10- 29 -22 -32 -0014, also known as 1357 Cope Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota of $8,750.00. WHEREAS, Thomas D. Hope and Susan D. Hope have waived, through Stipulation, the requirements for notice and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.701, Subd. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1) The following parcel, located in the City of Maplewood, be reduced by $7,105.80 from $15,855.80. and that the reassessment for the, following parcel located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey be $8,750.00, to -wit: Property Identification No. 10- 29 -22 -32 -0014, also known as 1357 Cope Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota, reassessment $8,750.00. Dated: Dated: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Gary Bastian Its Mayor By Lucille Aurelius Its City Clerk 3 ow j BANNIGAN &KELLY, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 409 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 5TH AND CEDAR SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 612) 224-3781 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W. QUARNSTROM September 21, 1992 Mr. Andre J. Zd razi 1 Attorney at Law 1208 McLean Avenue St. Paul, MN 55106 FAX (612) 223-8019 Re: Gethsemane Lutheran Church vs. City of Maplewood Dear Mr. Zdrazil: Please find herein the proposed Stipulation of Settlement and Resolution. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A. Patrick J. Kelly PJK:ks Enclosures Case Type: Assessment Appeal STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY Gethsemane Lutheran Church, Plaintiffs, vs. City of Maplewood, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No. C9 -91- 013613 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT IN RE: APPEAL FROM LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOCAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. CH. 429 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of byand between GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH, (hereinafter "Gethsemane ") and the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City ") WHEREAS, pursuant properursuanttoroer notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has onassedu all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of McKnightppJ Road Phase III: Beaver Lake to Conway Avenue Improvement Project, also known as Project 87 -05. WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §429 et cal, Gethsemane has filed a Notice of Appeal to the $22,792.11 parcel assessment. WHEREAS, the Notice of Appeal for assessments was set for trial in Ramsey County District Court on October 29, 1992, as Case No. C9 -91- 013613. WHEREAS the City and Gethsemane entered into settlement negotiations in order to avoid continued litigation and costs. WHEREAS, the City and Gethsemane have agreed to a reassessment in the amount of $18,502.33 per parcel to be levied for street, sidewalk, storm sewer and water service upon the whole property described in the Notice of Assessment Appeals. WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement concerning the reassessment of the parcel. Gethsemane agrees to waive the Notice of Hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071, Subd. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed upon that: 1) The City's reassessment for street, sidewalk, storm sewer and water service on the property identified as PIN 25- 29 -22 -31 -0029, also known as 2410 Stillwater Road shall be as follows: Assessment on Parcel 25- 29 -22 -31 -0029 in the amount of $18,502.33. 2) That Gethsemane hereby waives a Notice of Hearing for reassessment on the above- captioned parcel pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071, Subd. 2. 3) That Gethsemane shall file with the Court a Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice and without Costs concerning Case No. C9-91-013613. 4) The City, by resolution, shall reassess the above- referenced parcel to $18,502.33. 5) Said reassessment shall be paid according to the original assessment notice and the City shall certify the reassessment to the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. THIS AGREEMENT consists of the agreement of the parties. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Dated: Dated: Patrick J. Kelly City Attorney GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH Andre J. Zdrazil, its Attorney 2 RESOLUTION NO.._., Project No. 87 -05 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for constructipP on of street, sidewalk, storm sewer and water service, also known as Project No. 87 -05, passed on October 14, 1991. WHEREAS, the assessment appeal was duly scheduled in Ramsey County District Court on October 29, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and Gethsemane entered into a Stipulation of Settlement in order to avoid continued litigation and additional costs for a final determination of benefit. WHEREAS, Gethsemane has agreed to a reassessment of its parcel, known as Parcel No. 25- 29 -22 -31 -0029, also known as 2410 Stillwater Road, Maplewood, Minnesota of 18,502.33. WHEREAS, Gethsemane has waived, through Stipulation, the requirements for notice and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.701, Subd. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1) The following parcel, located in the City of Maplewood, be reduced by $4,289.78 from $22,792.11. and that the reassessment for the following parcel located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey be $18,502.33, to -wit: Property Identification No. 25- 29 -22 -31 -0029, also known as 2410 Stillwater Road Maplewood, Minnesota, Reassessment is $181,502.33 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Dated: Dated: By of Gary Bastian Its Mayor By Lucille Aurelius Its City Clerk 3 sj:w C STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY Donald and Toni John, Plaintiffs, Court File No. C3- 91- 012439 vs. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT City of Maplewood, Defendant. IN RE: APPEAL FROM LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LOCAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. CH. 429 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of by and between DONALD AND TONI JOHN, (hereinafter "John ") and the CITY OF MA..PLEWOOD, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City ") WHEREAS, rsuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City CouncilpP1' has onassedu all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of McKnightppJ Road Phase III: Beaver Lake to Conway Avenue Improvement Project, also known as Project 87 -05. WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §429 et al, John has filed a Notice of Appeal with respect to PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0070 to the $18,401.22 assessment and PIN 25-29-22 - pP res p 33 -0071 to the $5,067.41 assessment. WHEREAS, the Notice of Appeal for assessments was set for trial in Ramsey County District Court as Case No. C3- 91- 012439. WHEREAS the City and John entered into settlement negotiations in order to avoid Case Type: Assessment Appeal DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT continued litigation and costs. WHEREAS, the City and John have agreed to a reassessment of parcel, PIN 25 -29- 22 -33 -0070 in the amount of $12,465.1.2 and parcel PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0071 shall remain the same, $5,067.41 to be levied for street, sidewalk, storm sewer and water service upon the whole property described in the Notice of Assessment Appeals. WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement concerning the reassessment of both garcels. John agrees to waive the Notice of Hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071,,p Subd. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed upon that: 1 The City's reassessment for street, sidewalk, storm sewer and water service on the ro ert identified as PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0070 and PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0071, also known as 2329pPY and 2335 Stillwater Road shall be as follows: Assessment on Parcel 25- 29 -22 -33 -0070 in the amount of $12,465.12, which represents a vacation of the watermain assessed in the amount of $5,936.10 Assessment on Parcel 25- 29 -22 -33 -0071 shall remain the same, $5,067.41. 2 ) That John hereby waives a Notice of Hearing for reassessment on the above- captioned parcels pursuant to Minn. Stat. §429.071, Subd. 2. 3 That John shall file with the Court a Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice and without Costs concerning Case No. C3- 91- 012439. 4 The City, by resolution, shall reassess PIN, 25- 29 -22 -33 -0070 at $12,465.12 and PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0071 at $5,067.41. 5 Said reassessment shall be paid according to the original assessment notice and the City shall certify the reassessment to the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. THIS AGREEMENT consists of the a of the parties. Dated: Dated: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Patrick J. Kell Cit Attorne DONALD AND TONI JOHN Mark Esslin its attorne 3 RESOLUTION NO, Project No. 87 -05 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for construction of street, sidewalk, storm sewer and water service, also known as Project No. 87 -05, passed on October 14, 1991. WHEREAS, the assessment appeal was duly scheduled in Ramsey County District Court on October 29, 1992, at 9:00 a.m. WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation and John entered into a Stipulation of Settlement in order to avoid continued litigation and additional costs for a final determination of benefit. WHEREAS, John has agreed to a reassessment of its parcel, known as Parcel No. 25- 29 -22 -31 -0029, also known as 2410 Stillwater Road, Maplewood, Minnesota of $18,502.33. WHEREAS, John has waived, through Stipulation, the requirements for notice and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. ,'429.701, SUM. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1) The following parcel, located in the City of Maplewood, be vacated by $5,936.10 from $18,401.22 for .PIN 25- 29 -22 -33 -0071 and that the reassessment for the following parcel located in the City of Maplewood, County of Ramsey be $12,465.1.2, to -wit: Property Identification No. 25- 29 -22 -33 -0070, also known as 2329 Stillwater Road, Maplewood, Minnesota, Reassessment is $12,465.12 2) The following Parcel, located in the City of Maplewood, shall remain the same, 5,067.41, to -wit: Property Identification No. 25- 22 -29 -33 -0071, also known at 2335 Stillwater Road, Maplewood, Minnesota. Reassessment is $5,067.41.. Dated: CITY OF MA.PLEWOOD By Gary Bastian, Its Mayor Dated: By Lucille Aurelius, Its City Clerk 11