HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992 09-14 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, 14, 1992
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No, 92 -17
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF. ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL. CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. M inutes of Meeting 92 -16, August 24, 1992
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA PRESENTATIONS
F. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City
Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion. There w i l l be no separate discussion on these
items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
I.s Approval of Claims
2. Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce Resolution of Support
3 Change of Manger: Olive Garden
41 Conditional Use Permit Review: 1285 Cope Avenue (Englewood Shops)
5 Final Payment: Footprint Lake - Project 87 -32
G. PUBLI`C.HEARINGS
10 7. :00 P.M., Proposed Community Center Project
2. 7 :30 P.M., Assessment Hearing
3. 7 :40 P.M., Assessment Hearing
40 7 :50 P.M., Assessment Hearing
5. 8:00 P.M., Assessment Hearing
6. 8 :30 P.M., Assessment Hearing
7, 9:00 P.M., Northwood Village:
- Holloway Ave., Project 87 -14
- Roselawn Ave., Jackson -Rice, Project 87 -01
- TH61- County Road B Storm Sewer, Project 90 -14�
- Beam Ave., West of TH61: Project 88 -12
- Larpenteur Ave,, I -35E - Edgerton: Project 86 -27
Land Use Plan
Street and Alley Vacation
Preliminary Plat
H. AWARD OF BIDS
I. Parks Tree Plantings: Project 92-3P
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Assessment Objection - McKnight /Highwood: Project 90 -10
2. Metro 2015 Report
3. Kennel License: Reconsideration - 1994 Winthrop
4. I -494 Interchange: Reconsideration
5. Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance (1st Reading)
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance. (1st Reading)
2. Full-Time Police Officer
3. Part -Time Dispatcher
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
N. ADNINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Schedule Council /Manager Meeting
2.
N. ADJOURNMENT
0
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, August U. 1992
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 92 -16
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 PM. by Mayor Bastian,
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL:
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor
.Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember
Frances L. Juker, Councilmember
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember
Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Arrived at 7:04 P.M.
L Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting of August 4, 1992
Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of CouncillManager Meeting
of August 4., 1992 as.presented.
Seconded by Ayes - all
2. Minutes of Meeting 92 -15 (August 10, 1992)
Mayor Bastian moved to approve the minutes of No. 92 -15 (August 10.
1992) as corrected.
Page 16: Motion to waive Rules of Procedure: Seconded by Councilmember Zappa
Ayes - Mayor Bast i an, Counc i 1 members
Juker, Rossbach, Zappa
Nays - Councilmember Carlson
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Ayes -.all
Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
L1. Manhole Levels
L2. Appointment of Project Review Committee
L3. Transportation Advisory Board Nomination
L4. Council /Manager Meeting - Include Adult Operations Ordinance
L5. Overlay Program
L6. Woodbury Interchange /Lake Drive
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
Ayes - all
1 8 -24 -92
EA. PRESENTATIONS
NONE
F. CONSENT AGENDA
Counci lmember Carlson moved, seconded by Counci lmember Zaapa: ayes all, to
approve the Consent Agenda, Items F -1.3.4 as, recommended. ( Item F -2 moved to
become J -8)
1. Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 763
86,323 69
$ 850
PAYROLL: 212
$ 41.489 98
$ 254
$1,104.,438.93
Checks #23420 - #23466
Dated 8 -3 -92 thru 8 -12 -92
Checks #18112 - #18244
Dated 8 -24 -92
Total per attached voucher /check
register
Payroll Checks #27940 thru #28137
Dated 8 -14 -92
Payroll Deduction Checks #28142 thru
#28159 dated 8 -14 -92
Total Payroll
GRAND TOTAL
2. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation
Moved to J -8
3. Eleventh Avenue (City Project 92 -17) No Parking
92 -08 -102
RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING ON ELEVENTH AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has planned the construction of Eleventh
Avenue from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street; and
WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid funds (M.S.A.
Project Number 138 - 122 -01) on the improvement of said street; and
WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum width
standards with unrestricted parking; and
WHEREAS, approval of the proposed construction as.a Municipal State Aid
Project is dependent upon specified parking restrictions.
1
2 8 -24 -92
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood
prohibits the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of Eleventh Avenue
from White Bear Avenue to Ariel Street.
4. Applebee's Liquor License - Change of Manager
Approved an intoxicating liquor 1 i cense for William J. Patten to serve as
the new manager of Applebee's at 3001 White Bear Avenue.
Mr. Patten introduced himself to the Council and stated he will meet with
the Chief of Police.
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:13 P.M.), Highwood /McKnight Improvement 90 -10: Assessment Hearing
a. Mayor.Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding .
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings.
d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Dennis Davidson, 830 Dorland Road (To meet with Ken Haider)
Roy Bredahl, Developer of Highwood Estates No. 2
Tom Fabio, 1068 Marnie (Assessed in 1976)
Robert F. Nelson, 1051 So. McKnight Road (Took 4 acres)
Brian M. Rembish, 1090 So. McKnight Road
Richard Ballinger, 1070 So. McKnight Road
Robert Haskins, 1020 So. McKnight Road (Assessed double)
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
g. Councilmember Zappa moved to cancel the 110 assessments where owners had
be_ previously assessed,then introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption.
92 - 08 - 103
ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the
proposed assessment for the construction of Highwood /McKnight Outlet as
described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 90 -10, and has amended
such proposed assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
3 8 -24 -92
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and
shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included i s hereby found
to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of 19 years, the first of the
installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in
January 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this Assessment
Resolution, To the first installment shall be added interest on
the entire assessment from the date of this Resolution until
December 31, 19929 To each subsequent installment when d.ue
shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to
reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of
this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying
additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for
the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the
improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the
improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such
assessment feasible.
40 To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting
properties which may be served by the improvement when One or
more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are
not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the
intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes
Section 420 .051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of
the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of t h i s
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property
tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected
and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
Mayor Bastian moved to direct staff to investigate the 1 -year hook up_quirement.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
2. 8:00 P.M. (8:06 P.M.), Variance: 2625 E. Larpenteur Ave. (Hill- Murray)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding .
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
4 8 -24 -92
d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard.
Joseph McHugh, President /Principal of Hill- Murray High School
e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
f. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adopt i o.n :
92 - 08 - 104
SIGH VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Hill Murray High School applied for a variance from the zoning
ordinance at 2625 Larpenteur Avenue East. The legal description is:
Part of S 1/2
of SE 1/4 WLY OF FOL DESC LINE;
COM AT SE
COR OF SEC
13 TH W ON S
LINE OF SD SEC 985 FT TH R 78 DEG 40 MIN
620 FT THE
CURVE LEFT RAD 100 FT FOR 157.08 FT TO POINT
OF TAN TH
R AT RA TO
TAN POINT 450
FT TH LEFT AT 4A 200 FT TH R AT
4A 225 FT
MOL TO THE
N LINE OF SD S
1/2 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO HWYS RDS
& ESMTS) IN SEC 13 TN
29 RN 22.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 316(3) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires
that wall signs for schools not exceed 24 square feet.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to put up a 99- square -foot wall
sign.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. This variance was reviewed by the Community Design Review Board
July 28, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve
the variance.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on August 24, 1992. City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law.
The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak
and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described variance for the following reasons:
1. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of
the ordinance, since the sign would not affect the residential
appearance of the neighborhood.
2. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship, because it would
be hard to see a 24- square -foot wall sign from Larpenteur
Avenue,
3. The sign would be in scale with the building and add a balanced
appearance with the existing cross.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
5 8 -24 -92
H. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Improvement 91 -10
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
92 - 08 - 105
AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid
of Ins i tuform Central in the amount of $355,690.00 is the lowest responsible
bid for the construction of District 22 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Replacement,
City Project 91 -10, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the
City.
FURTHERMORE, the project budget is amended to $430,000.00, and the
project financing is amended as follows: Sanitary Sewer Fund $430,000.00
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS - (Continued)
3. 8:15 P.M., Variance: 2480 Linwood Ave. (Jirovec)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding .
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report,
d. Commissioner Martin presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
James Karper, 2516 Linwood Ave. E. (in favor)
Al Jerovic, 2480 Linwood Ave. E. (the applicant)
Resident of 2437 Linwood Ave. E.
Terrence McCarthy, 2409 Linwood Court
e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
f. Mayor Bastian moved to add a condition that the property owner may be
required to provide a cash escrow to guarantee the removal of the
building if the removal has not been completed within one year of
issuance of the permit.
6 8 -24 -92
J
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all
g. Councilmember Zappa moved to add an additional condition. that the area
around the _proposed garage _shal l be landscaped and reviewed by the
Community Design Review Board.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa
Nays am Mayor Bastian, Council member
Carlson
Notion failed by tie vote
h. Councilmember Carlson moved to amend the preceding motion to state that
"the area around the proposed ,garage may be regu.i d ,�to be landscaped
and reviewed by the Communi Design Review Board" .
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, . Juker
Nays - Council Zappa
i. Councilmember Zappa i ntroduced the following Resolution and moved is
adODtion:
92 - 08 - 106
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Albert Jirovec requested that the City approve the
constructi0n of a 2699- square -foot pole building.
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood chooses to approve this building with a
conditional use permit.
WHEREAS, section 36 -17(B) of City Code allows the City to approve a
conditional use permit for the substitution of one nonconforming use for
another nonconforming use.
WHEREAS, Mr. Jirovec is proposing to substitute a 2600- square -foot
garage for two garages. The combined area of the two garages would be 4,300
square feet.
W this permit applies to 2480 Linwood Avenue. The legal
description is:
Subject to Linwood Avenue, the north 15 acres of the east 20 acres
of the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 28, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on August 3,
1992. They recommended that the City. Council approve said
permit.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on August 24, 1992. The
City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to
the surrounding property owners, as required by law. The
Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and
present written statements. The Council also considered the
City staff and Planning Commission reports and recommendations.
7 8 -24 -92
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve this
conditional use permit because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of
the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke.,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water
runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access
on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
10. Reduce the number and square- footage of garages on the site.
11. Result in a more restrictive use than the current use,
12. Improve the appearance of Mr. Jirovec's property by replacing
two old buildings with a smaller new building.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction must follow the site plan on page 8 of the July
29, 1992 staff report. The Director of Community Development
may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major
changes.
2.. The property owner shall remove the concrete block and metal
pole buildings within one month of occupying the new building,
3. The property owner shall keep a minimum of 42,000 square feet of
property with the home and garages.
4. The garage shall not be used for a business.
8 8 -24 -92
5. There shall be no outside storage of intrable vehicles,
vehicle parts, scrap materials or debris.
6. The garage shall be located as shown on the 2480 Linwood site
plan.
7. The property owner may be required to provide a cash escrow to
guarantee the removal of the building if the removal has not
been completed within One year of issuance of the permit.
8. The property owner may be required to provide landscaping around
the garage area and to have the landscaping reviewed by the
Community Design Review Board,
9. The Council'shall.review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
- Council directed staff to report back to Council with a clarification of the site
plan for Mr. Jirovec's property.
H. AWARD OF BIDS - (Continued)
2. Sterling- Linwood Improvement
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved „its
adoption.
92 - 08 - 107
AWARD Of BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid
of F. M. Frattalone, in the amount of $573,876.95, is the lowest responsible
bid for the construction of Sterling-Linwood Improvements, City Project 87-
45, and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City.
FURTHERMORE, the project budget is amended to $752,000, and the project
financing is amended as follows:
Municipal State Aid
Special Assessments
TOTAL
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson
9
X344,500.00
447.944.50
x792,444.50
(Excess of 540,444.50)
Ayes - all
8 -24 -92
I . UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Conditional Use Permit Review Fi nal ube
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following was heard:
Chuck Phillips, representing Fina
d. Mayor Bastian moved to approve the conditional use permit for five
years, with a request to Fina to look into the potentially dangerous
. situation of the entrance off of County Road B.
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all
Counci 1 di rected staff to revi ew the acci dents at County Road B and Whi to Bear Avenue
to see if any were related to the Fina entrance off of County Road B.
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Code Interpretation: Side Yard Setback (Langenfeld)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following was heard:
Bob Langenfeld, the applicant, representing H L Construction
d. Councilmember Zappa moved to interpret the Ordinance to require a side
yard setback of five feet for Mr. Lan.genfel d's building because (1) the
gage i s not a tuck -under garage and (2) the dwelling is .16 feet from
the side lot 1 i ne
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Zappa
Nays - Councilmember Juker
2. Establish Public Hearing: County Road C Improvement 89 -04
a. Manager .McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the speci f i cs ' of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
10
8 -24 -92
92 -08 -108
4
ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized
and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of County
Road C - TH61 to Hazelwood, City Project 89 -04, by construction of street
with concrete curb and gutter, new bridge, storm sewer, sidewalk and
appurtenances, and
.WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for
the improvement herein described:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA as follows:
1 . The report of the City Engineer advising t h i s Council that the
proposed improvement on County Road C -TH61 to Hazelwood, City
Project 89 -04 by construction of street with concrete curb and
gutter, new bridge, storm sewer, sidewalk and appurtenances is
feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby
received.
2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in
accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited
property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the
improvement of $571,000.
3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the
City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 28th day of
September, 1992, at 7:00 p.m, to consider said improvement . The
City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said
hearing and improvement as required by law.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker,
Zappa
Nays - Councilmember Bastian
3. White Bear Improvement 89 -12 Agreements
a.. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the proposed agreement with Ramsey
County Department of Parks and Recreation f inclusion of real ac i na the
sewer and water mains serving Aldrich Arena and the nursinq home.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
4. Hazelwood Feasibility Study
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
11
8 -24 -92
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian moved that the feasibility reports for Hazelwood,. County
Road C to Beam, City Project 92 -13 and Hazelwood- Markham Pond, City
Project , 92 -14 be , sto . Ded and ended .
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Juker
Nays - Councilmember Zappa
5. Metro 2015 Review
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report
c. Commissioner Martin presented the Planning Commission report.
d. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
e. Councilmember Zappa moved to table_ t h i s item until after the Elected
Officials meeting and requested staff to forward a l eater explaining the
City's position,
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
6. Renewal of Group Insurance Contracts
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Zappa moved to renew the existing one -Year contracts for
employee insurance and that the Long -Term, Disability coverage be
increased to X50,000.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
7. Reconsideration: Kennel License - 2994 Winthrop
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian moved to place this item on the September 14, 1992 Agenda
for reconsideration of the August 10, 1992 vote.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers
Carlson, Juker
Nays Councilmember Zappa
8. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (Moved from F -2)
a. Councilmember Zappa moved to deny the reauest of Mr. Rud i e to cancel the
ambulance b i l l and direct staff to .pursue collection of this bill,
E
12 8 -24 -92
Seconded by Councilmember Juker
Notion Failed By Tie Vote
Ayes - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa
Nays Mayor I Bastian, Councilmember
Carlson
b. Mayor Bastian moved,to table the item until the September 14 meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Carlson
Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa
Notion Failed By Tie Vote
c. Councilmember Carlson moved to cancel the ambulance bill.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes- Mayor Bastian, Councilmember
Carlson
Nays - Councilmembers Juker, Zappa
Notion Failed By Tie Vote
d. Mayor Bastian moved to „proceed to Item K -1.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. George Supan, 3050 Hazelwood Avenue
a. Mayor Bastian moved to table this item.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. L1. Manhole Levels
a. Mayor Bastian read a letter regarding the manhole cover level in front
of the Gladstone Community Center. The manhole is lower than the
surface of the street.
b. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct the letter to Ramsey County and to
Commissioner Hal Norga„ rd.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
2. Appointment of Project Review Committee
a. Mayor Bastian read a proposal regarding the establishment of such a
committee.
13 8 -24 -92
r
b. Mayor Bastian moved to direct staff to this on the September 28,
1992 Council Agenda to proceed with establishing such a committee.
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all I
y
3. Transportation Advisory Board Nomination
a. Councilmember Zappa reported on a request for a Maplewood representative
on the Transportation Advisory Board. He would be willing to serve on
this Board.
b. Mayor Bastian moved to nominate Councilmember Zappa as Maplewood's
representative on the Transportation Advisory Board.
Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all
4. Council. /Manager Meeting - Include Adult Operations Ordinance
a. Councilmember Zappa stated he would like' this topic on the next
Council /Manager meeting agenda.
b. This will be placed on the next Council /Manager meeting agenda.
5. Overlay Program
a. Mayor Bastian requested that an overlay program be established. It is
too late to have one this year. He would like to make this a part of
the budget process to have quality project at the least cost.
6. Woodbury Interchange /Lake Drive
a. Mayor Bastian discussed the Woodbury Interchange at Lake Drive and asked
for an update of Woodbury Council action.
b. Director of Public Works Haider stated the Woodbury Council approved the
project but left the alternatives open.
c. Mayor Bastian moved to reconsider the Woodbur_ylLake Drive Interchange
and place it on the September 14. 1992 Council Agenda,
Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all
M. ADNINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
NONE
N.. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
10:36 P.M.
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
14 8 -24 -92
AGENDA NO, F -I
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: September 3, 1992
Y
bar Coma •
�
Mo d�'e
'
ect
Date
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 653 Checks # 23467 thru # 23552
Dated 8 -13 -92 thru 8 -31 -92
$ 444.151.86 Checks # 18255 thru # 18424
Dated 9 -14 -92
$ L098 Total per attached voucher /check
register
P AYROLL:
$ 201, 952.27 Payroll Checks # 28182 thru # 28351
dated 8-28-92
$ 41,728.59 Payroll Deduction check # 28356 thru
# 28371 dated 8 -28 -92
$ 243 Total Payroll
$-- 1, 341, 693.03 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
lz
Attachments
FINANCE/APPRCLM.AGN
V 0 #«J l.: H R' E (.5
C I 11"Y
Li F 11 A PL E W 0
A ,
.. .... ........
...... E1
T
F 0 R
P E V" 0 D 08
VOUCHER/
C. H E K
V E N D 0 R
1-1 E ( r••.
V E.N.-I 1) 0 13
1 TE ,:.. -1
1 E [71
C F1 E C K
NUMBER
N U 11i B E R
DATE
N 1*111 E
DEE S) C R I P'*I*' 1 FJ N
A lyi cl U
A t7l 0 U N T
..,46 ■■
t . } >
a '9Z
CLERK OF D I '%'3T R I C T
C N R I V • E R S L I FE Ef PA YABLE
14 4.50
144 -1 0
2_3_4 6 8
510 100
08/13/9,
-VIAPLE L.vt"-'AF OFFIC.I.ALS 'SEN.
0 f:7
FA Y 11 E NIT `P 0 Rl 13 FF I C I L
Z 5
1" A �T`Ivl E f 0 f:- S PO
f Q . 00
-.F469 541400
0 t_, 1 •3
lyl I N N A' T E "I" 1-*'k"E A U R
f��f ` T I— D I " V L I C P A "Y' A 1' L.
5 0
5. 0
. .......... ...
34 0
541400
8 1 9 Z
M I N N ST A TE TREASURER
MOT'OR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
1 526 38
IL 4 52CI
23471
1 Q0 00
1 9
Q 0 U R
D 0 F N A U R A L RE— -_j ci
____- [,,i:E I EES PAY`
_ . ; _ -LE
D [-11 R L I
_10.00
3 4
19 4. 0
•
0 1 4 .2�' D E 0 F N A T U RA L f-J" 0 U R S E ':3 1` ! F* L I EN %S* E F Et`:-.'S P A'Y.,--. L`.'L E
1.0.00
2'-:347 3
11 0:-Z_-*5. 0
0 8 1 4. 2
W'. H 1 1-4 C
A W A R D 17- D C 0 N S 11"R U 1`T I N C 0 1 1 ,1 R 'A T
170 08L9 34
0 N T R A T" PA Y A B L E - R E I N G' E
r`0 4 . 4 7 ""
4 . A' "'r
161 c.
47 4
!-50
105
o c: 1 4 9 2
11UN I C I P AL 0.)MMERC I AL E W R S-1
ER V
J E T S E T 0 F 11 A 1 N L 11`4 E E W E R
5 N o 0
1 5 �:a 0
-347 5
5 4 1 4 Oi.T
08/14/9
M I N11 T A T E TREASURER
17 0 R V E 1-i L I C FE E PA Y A L-''L E
7�
----------- 7
•
3o:$ 76'.
51 4 IL
8 /1 / .9 2
J1 INN . �-' TA T E 1" R E ► LJ f" E R
"i3? "I L 1
A TE DR 1. VE 1 FEE PAYABLE
9 Q to
3 47
4 5 1 0
0 8 1 9
L 1yJ A C a I A T
I N S L) R A' N k**'E
9 4 .00
:_34
7Z -4`2 0 Q.
1 9
P U B 1�* C E M P 1- 0 Y E E
R A DEDUCTION PAYAE,'LE
P E
"R-A 10 N
9 C A
PERA D E D U C-T I Q N P A Y A B.
-L E
I 1. 9.1
--- ----
PIE - ---------
R A N 11" F' I B UT 10 N S
14, 494 .90
2.
"1._'3 4 7 9
3 4 1 70*J6 o 1 "T
-iE R I T 'GE B N K
F . I A. C A, A A. P A " A B L. E
1 1 4 !_5
FEDERAL I N C lyl E T A E r.5 P A Y A r "L L E
2 i-3 7'r 6 82f 8
F A. CON r 1 BUT IONS
194 .9 5,
4.
4 0
a 8 ..500
0 17 9 8-2-
T CITY TESTING
- ' UUTES I DEE ENG I !'--JEER I NG FEES :' :.
C 0 .('10
oo 00
3 -1 All
0104-70
117/9'
0 :'_- .1 e_
..... .....
A 14 1A1 A
... . ........ .
F: ct Ci r%. o
. .......... .......... .......
4 G 12-
10.
17 9 [f'
CH I P PEW A
W A I" LE R EQUIPMrE'NT REN'TAL
T J .r
`7 80
A
15.o 9 0
0`_-`i 17' 2
BALLY'S
T 'R'A -V E 11 ## A 11`4
4.84
9 10500
•
V A "k f R- U L--' B 1 1-1 RE lyl 0 V A L
R U �3 1 H R i- 1 Ci V A L.
... ...........
213 4 5
540900
0 . 8 "T • 9
ill ].NN. G.F.O.A.
T R A V EL t TRAININ -
10 . 0 In
TRAVEL TRAININQ
4
0 0 4 C 0
0" f 1 "T 2
A I R S 1 113 N A L g I t\1 c .
ty! t ^E N "I" H L Y 11A I NiT V ICE F'AGIER
13 1
1 9
W A I t U
_ER C00111JER/EQ5 I P R A L
9 10
9 1
-:1 A I::.
Q
M A P I C I �e T IN! i'•
V U L I R E S
Or
_
....
_ f ( ` 7 jwi;
.. 7
- Y +...+ �i t.: H E R .
v
r 7 . .. t , 0 1
M i .f M E E R
ki u M 1! 4..._ �.
L! /'_ • t • 1
7' ` (' I•
� D - .. s '~, r f t t a. J 1 y
r I7+ +_ +.. i E
7 �_. ...
• I
r{ tl + -D I. I I': f
"
L_ • .' ' .j
i + 15 i ( .i
w
} f i '..f t:
IY1 t E}I M I� `«
t 1 f i 1 t i.. f E S"
"i ice.. I . r .." y 0
4 � .0c) _
..
' 4 9 4
0
I - i f ` l
�� / *' i ti
1
i
1 i R i"1 f . 1 PA T 0
i
� s
` '� �_{ f 1
0 . - ! i % �''
Irk +'+� r . i t I i; r.., ! �, t
J ..j_ '.` L: I '1 € t_ ,_ ,- - ,; 1 = }..
i
_
Fi
.T, : L
2
�..
w ." t s
_
t t :
s } , 9 >.
" ..
� .�.
I• i 1 ' ! ,� T :. f�: +�+ + Fri S ,wF 1 + � ! �_ F{
_ � '
` � I �'. I E 1 I`�I ,:... I ! � A :� P A '.1' L_. �
.
, a „
9 �t �.
+;' ,`� « fit
0 i » ' f 9
s ". [ ` - B
f t
!^i A t.i € � La �. I :i � i +^ I i ! N
+� =' -'" 5
; ..�.
C i
.:.
j{
,::.. •..t � : � �
'_' : ' �_• : f �..} 1 - }
f - _ -
! ^� � ~� 1 f � • t f ' 1..-
1 - }, � : � i�: + + • i : j{ • I'.) yf • j '
L.� 7 1.'., f7 � M L... r•'t � ... � "� � ;� ! I 7��•� C � t 1 7 •��
j
'( EE 1 -7 � 1 ••� � � ++
• � '
... L. - -
-
60 ,: w i
_ _:.._..
-.
3... � E
M 13 .4
T E 1_ E P I -1 i;� N
_
�, ' 0 1 �+� 1 • t
U :
E P T Ll i L.
-r 1'
- - 1 - El- L I::: H ►_ ) E,,I E
u 4 CS
.«i i+ 5
T � I E� F� �'� 0 IA ""
- _
45
_._..__.. - -. _..._._. .._ ._. -.. _._. ._ - .. -.
.
_
i 70.
1
. .. -.' _
a i....
" I E L_ E F"t F-I +_+ I ':i E .
_
� yM•
iwl y L_
.-• -
go
r
- -
I E I E:: F* *' H ID !--� E.
! : L 7
{ i {
- NE
4 u 1 +J
T' 1:-.. L _
_.
F L E. t' -' iI Cli 1"4 Et
w
I
4 9 4�- -,
,:... :.i ::. �;: `ri
'_i r (} .. •' (`-
�" , t ._.1 r . ^�
' �, 'i i P'i l t'
i'�i I" i� ...I I l + '
,:... .' s "1. '. J {..:'
1 ..' %i ,:,. t ( ..l i
5 „i o %r
. f^^` I 111 C: .. i .. •i ;. f. t s.1 +..# F•• ..I.. I.�I A i t �...
J � � l� -1 ( y7 ».' E !, ( ..•.I .�. �.�� !'+ I... f I
•y -
1. -
.i y
A=, -
P A
iJ FI E ::.
I T
17.. F1
W U M E I 1-k
J%j a 1-fl
J-) E r
A M U-i 1%.
A rl 0 U N _1
4 7
{ r! i. .�+ t �:.
- ----- - --------- e-P
;_Y :� • i _� T .''
R M P-4 L L. 11 ST'R A I- 1 0 1-4 S,
F' R 0 13 R M P F` I I E f3t
11�30 CIO
180 0 0
4. 1. -4 0
tie 1A E T R
PA
T R V E H L F- E. E Y A TB L E
6 T 5
8 �••
6
_7A
.1 4 I t {-
{ . ' •' `_.' . ' '• •, ' "•
' ' `` r •. , '_^ '• r'' u 11 E 1
E D I, E
f E.' R L I C" P A Y E',' L. L
C)
7 50
!' 5 4
0 1 "_y 2-
I'll I N N G f--' Cl A
...........
'TRAVEL 13.1 TRAIN I NG
1 51 0 00
1* FZ A V E L. T f R A 1 '1' N G
450 fi 0 C,
6 0 0 0
P
I E L tj �,l i
TE R F: I ` L j
C . 0
3 0
11 A N Ak n
�- R A E L 'T R A i 14 N ('1
I 1 .00
5 414. 00
8 1
M I NN '31 T le"'k T E R. E A'_3f U R E R
t-.
I*fI OT 0 R V E H I.... I
q r . i �.
13 95 51 50
r f" 4
5 4 1 4 t)
15 1- E_ -F R ?3 1 _J LEE f
E-1 1- TE D R '11"E" F'. E3
tj C .,
3 50
1.404(
r f` C"T R T
�'l T D R I R -1 1 C
1. 4'_
'7 F
1 4 0
0 7 "1 0
0
BE • C. 1-'. E R R 0 Jvq A L D
VACATION CHECK
3" 3 5 4
3 3 5 4
'E' P 1" f j 1) - . . ..... V I -- C , 1 E I.-k
`�iEl_ A I I'll
0
2.5 00
5 4 4 0 0
0
10, 3i. 0
10,
'54 1 4 0 0
0 0 f 17) -7-
Ck j . F -
M I Nil -S TATE 'IFREAS'Ui ER
S''T All"E )-')RIVERS Ll C
317 .00
317 .00
N A f A r- I*
F I:_E_-: P 3". U L T 1 (.31
1 5 0 .
4 f
. ..... . .......
-7- 1
D E P T OF' U F,,*-I,
1D N R L I Ell S E F* E PA A. R, L E
0
1 4 0 0
i °, � � -
1 '9 2
D 0 F" • N A T U R AL E 0 U R S
D P� R L I C.* E NESE F E E S P A Y A B L E'
1 0 0
1 13 0
541
T E T M- 'R R
E
j R EH L I C' F-_ I A L E
.. ........
'T 0
. ..... . .... ............ ........ ....... ---------
1 4.
4 J. 4
1 Jj 0 -T I - F , . ..... I
41 F
F __D
T 'T D 11'" 1E R L I F_ E E F1 .... L
0 0
5
Q Cl i 1.. 1 t:..
�J •_! .E.
• 1.
! A E ': S) J' A ' -` B L 0 U T C.1, F S3 T A T E
1 ":31 0 0
I` F---. . D E R
... .. ......
�° -;
R, RD 1 1`4 f'::; F--'-'
...... ..... I a . c
0
1. 5 f
F , I ,-; J. V U E
FUEL TAX
4
4
4 1 0 0
0:---'-t 2. 4
" R 3 11 F .. ..
Mf IJ [Eld L I F:'E E L 1E
oi
i T V 17.
ED i V E' A*: L E
4
5
M-E TA F:
tj T 1 L . 1.
J 1 i L {
1 0
":49
. V 0 Li C H R E • CG
C.* 1 `,` Y
0 F: 11 A PL. E W -i'D 13
FO A G El 4 .
810 DRIVERS LIC. FEE' F; A Y -A B L E
1 C 1 L 1 C V 1 :. f
C - C if E. i 1: �:.-3 11 -
4 1 4 0 0
0
I'vl I N 1`4 S 'I" A 11 E I' R LIE A L J R E R
fil 0 10 R V E H L I C. F'E E F A Y A B'L E-:
A/ 0 Li C H El FR j/
10 6 4 7 . 2 J ..
.3
--4
.........
hE _;i i {,•f
w. 1-1 E c: f.., V E N D Cllf�
--- ------ -- .... ...... _ �
13 A'. C P 0, it A ER L E:
0 1 2 0 0 0 0
N U l• l D. i: R N, U 1*1 L; E R
D A E tl E.:
D E: CAR I P - 1 - 1: Ci N
A lyl 0 U fll' A tf 1 C', U I--J
S.A.C. RUVAINER
1 J I L. I I E -SE3
6 9 i
35
353
6-4-f-4
U` -F I L I -F I E S
17 16 419.74
• 35 2 2 13 5 1 5 0
0 2: •4 S Y 'T E 11S S E R V :1 C. L---" C 0 1 P A N' Y
- -.. .__�._ _. ....._...._ ..__ ._ -.__
R E F'A 1 F.' iYiA I N I" U I L. 1 T Y
_.. _....___. -... _.._.___ ..._.. _ — - _ ... _. ... - - _. _ _. ` _.. _...___..._ — .. ._ ........_... __.. _.. .._. -..... ..__... - - - --------
6 2. 6. 0 0 2: Is 0 R !,,.i E S, "1" 1. 1--,l V L.E. S 1'.1 E 1"! -F S E Ft. V I C. F'!-*-, :1 N C 1 i:*-: A L P A \!lll
I f` 11 R E 3 'T P A Y il'E 1�41 T S 5 t i 6 .
5 Z 4
541400
-: / 2 5 Z
01c
MINN. STAVE 'TREASUREA
810 DRIVERS LIC. FEE' F; A Y -A B L E
5 9 - 0 0
!'-Jt tl; 0
4 1 4 0 0
0
I'vl I N 1`4 S 'I" A 11 E I' R LIE A L J R E R
fil 0 10 R V E H L I C. F'E E F A Y A B'L E-:
10
10 6 4 7 . 2 J ..
.3
--4
.........
hE _;i i {,•f
.
t .; i 1 t:... ! r` ' �� f�
#'' f i... 1 '. t..� 3"i rl rJ Y i • 1.... -. �,-j �'�l ..i �' ��� #,., i e..• +_ i "{ t' 1 :..3 t:.i 1 til
13 A'. C P 0, it A ER L E:
0 1 2 0 0 0 0
S.A.C. RUVAINER
zol--* . oo--
19, 9g.e.00
35
353
6-4-f-4
'T A " F E El R - 1 V I 'f` R L
- 3 - 0'J. -.- - 5 0
:l'; 0 1 C.,
3 5
4 1 4. 0 0
2. 7 9 2.'
M I N.11`4 S 'T A I E 'T 113 E A :3.' t. j f E R
M f...' 7'1 R V E H L I C.' FE E P A 'Y AlE. E
1 5 7 2 23
15 7 2- 2
2. 3 5, 7
;3'() 0 2 5 5
0 8 2
S E L, L G W E N
TERMINATiON CHECK
564.47
1564.47'
7 ZZ,-.-� 0 0
0,':-.*,' 2:
f--'tj E L. I C: E N F'L 0 'y'E E-"
•P-LFZA F�AYAll'.';LE
1 3 q 7 i
I-:' E: R A C 0 NI F R' i B. 1 io 1--1
1. 4 0 4
26, 015 7"
9
662600
0 8 •Z 8
NOFTWES1 INVES"i"MEN'l-S SERVICES
f I N 1 F L P A Y Il E ki'T'S
4 16 6
I- E l 'E S 'T P A Y fil E N 'TS
119.60
6 5 % +:
; D
3 1 0 0
2
G 0 N Y El A G 0 M FS N Y , 1 14 (c
I)EPOSITS PAYABLE
4 000 . 00
. 5 0 0 01 0
5 4 1
10 4 t i
G '.D
H A 110 V E R , C • I'T Y 0 F
� _• i . 1 ..� + .,.
1 . 715
19 • .7 • -t
o 1315 l
190400
• '8.
DEFT . 0 F 14 A'T U R A I. •f 17 S 0 1.1 FR 13 El is
Di*---.IR LICENSE FE E!5 PAYABLE
1 03 . 0
10:.:. 0 o
-- 54 3
5 4 14- 0 0
o
I-.,i 1- hj 1- )"L:� - F� R E
I~_
I k T E D R' 1 V f-- R "z-. L Jif C: F -' E I A Y A L E.
. ...... .. . .. a .........
9 C,
. 9 58 0
5 4 4
• 4 11 -4 0 0
0
1•1 1" -A 1* E 'T R'E W-E .,.1 R E
VE.'-'+'l LIC F*E--,�E'-:--; FAYA.l'.----l.-.E
7
1. - 5 7"
-`5 4 - 5
4 17
• 9
HE TAGE L N
F." I :J C. A P A `�.; A E. L E
9 ti 9 :z-.
11",iCf-It7lE TAXES FWYABLE
0 1. 9 0
1 1 c: A C 1 1 ' 1 " 1"1 I L u - I o i
5 4 1 6
5 1 0 J. 0
(),D
I'l A I:- L E.. k C C D F" I i"'•.1::. FR E-E L I E: F
D U ET 'F 0 0 "f i---i E C
t'.) 4 C.,
0 0
4 - l • o
-D I
lyl I Ni [4 . S 'I'A "FE-.' 1- R A S U R h.
I'l 0 'T k V F. i-i I.- I C E'.: EH P A A L
3
5 4,'-::'
ti 4 1. 41, { «} :,?
.. ... 2
M 1 14 ki . A'T'E IF- A'E.-AJ F.. E R
•
0
7 o
1 9
AMB ULANCE OVERPAYMENT
1 2.'
0 -i!' C." o
0 3 1
D A Z I C:
L {. i ! i f � . �..� � ;_ ;.. � �
L. ;, � •.: i..
r � I :_; j- �. ? ::. is �.; ,_ t _t i j
. ,. '._a �. _1
'
�_ '� t :. 1 _. �''•.
,' F::. I't J._J i..i I t
t.• ! i :. �..• t'•.
5 .t . i jr t...; "l,
I' i �_ ° I ...: .
..�
;:! :� ! -
j .E . y t r ;
;. �M _, -I r i�f
r .1 �. r _ 1'..�. � t. N
A M 0 c � N T
A tyl f_f 1 I I - %I T
U IF 1 ' !5.2 E 1: � V T E
1 0
.... {, ti.. ... !:::'F' .. r ... . -_.._ ,. ... _
ref •'�
r L. � . j.l �'' "' J. !.i f_i i t"' j L..
� ..:
R
! !
I-• FR0GR S U F P L. I E S
1 1 p 5 �'
1 .85
S[ }
•`_' �.! L_ f'% Y i s f.,..
L« •• A I ,
A 4
+ ! ,J E_J 0
t_? ;�� .!' "+ : ` `'' f
�`� t TAI f . C f_t 1 I jl i �'� ,'t i 0 N E R
E TA
r :fir �t T E I I � t. 0 M PAY �! �_ L � .
�} r t, e
� f !... � _ _
.: 3 �• ti
..........._........ ..
i - ` •'r' t^ ` •- t
1
_.. , _..........
t r • . t _ ... -_..
t , _
... ...., = ..: _..{ ' . % F ' ,1 1.... f = ! I ..l
_. .. L.
7
`."..'' r l • A l ' L.- 1't� : I...f t 1..... " 7 1 t t l " •{ yJ,. i
f , t
- C~,
4
f _
"f �
P: P,,
I C)
j 1 4 r
�.. F'
t: f f I ! T I'. t , 1= I
t } 1
A -
t a �. � ••!
,'i i:
t tT
0 J «t { "�
a. "r
0 9 / 'I `"`
�
n F' n f ,e I� L A
ff _ "� (F [t
_.! U I -' P I._ I � a I~. .t,, 1. t � I ' I E 11 i
C'
2 "f . 0 � .i
2 5 p 00
I t:: �'' t •'
} {-
"y i ' t 1
t fA t - 7 1 7 1 Li
-3 U F: I...' L .I 1 1...•t L1i f � .. ..�.. _ R .L
1.
.. .: ... ,..
�_J ,� t_t �� �_J ! ,
...
t�} : r !. I' i ' , _
:.t
Y�. F; j 1�� i t l fi I T I`a ►. ,,
t. r t
A. I h ' T I4'I L I' } ` .t •. •_ ice.
` _ Imo:. I' °:I t L -� ''.
-
:
_ _ - . -._`f -- - - -
LE R
..
t
., 5 �f
0 w. t..! i i ` 0
� {
�_# r�i q 4 12—
^~ i ' F'
A M A TE U R ELECTR _ U ,p+ I,_. Y
_ _. ,..
B � 1 f f I':, �
� � 11 ' t . �t
� "R a 83
..: _ _ ._.........
!y
(j ,'(
l' t _ F
...t t i' ::•
., + P 1 . t
j �}•j - , '( r' s P LAN, 1 '( �• r•. 1 "� ( .. ('� 1 '( s (
TS i "I : t .L i• ! ! i' 1 f N �_� ! _ ._' f._ 1..• f ^ 1 1 �...f I'i
S_' { f
( r
R
i" + f � { !.t l"
� 4 5 R 8 t " }
T
,'1 _ :
", :, ", 1
_>_..
_. - .______.._._.._.___.
._. .. .� .__ _-- ,___;��
t ��. e
"
�___...._. ..... .___..__.___
J • % ,w «.
t o :� f 1 4? :j
_......_._..._ _. ._..__...__. ._ _ _ . .. .. . ...... ....
PUBLI , f s •i
f f f'.
A M E R 1 � A ICI P U B L I _ It1 OF . I >: �. A ; ._, _. w a
.. _ _ .i _ I 1 •_•_ ! 1 _ t } • +. •___ j) _}..- y1• }�«••._ -_dpi _�y(�•
i '' t': r ` M
REPAIRS it, f i i i N .. !._ n - 7 i.,.. ! ^� �..r .1. t #`� t
_. t
400.00
t i t 3 f l 4 "l
- - T .. ..a " "
_
`
_. L 0 0 L. 1
1
,, ( _t
a• f' `.: `:.`
% ,, w•
1 4 ? i._
; _` r - _ {r� : t f f !: {.. ,.._1 t �}-
I -a �.:! E i '. t.1 .. t tl ... .. � f....
REIMBURSEMENT FOR REFUND.
- �. 4
! ,.... n ;
� -
t i_. .
t J : t tit t }
"
"� ?� � �! �
0 1 4
(" ! t f E ! R S I
�.I C 1 I I ? r! ._ _. I''�I .." L._ Lr F . 1 _ I__ „
A I T .
r f 't� R ' �
ICI .> I i L. � _ I f � I? .: _
9
g J
-
J _
t' t ' =j
"' ` =� �} `�' ,
A R • 1 f� "; ` ~ t ti 1 C c
I'a '� fµ 1 -
._ _ - _ _
1 T t
I : E F' A I i ; " M A I I'`�# •1 . �1 E l "� _: L.. t: ....._...
8 7 +1 �F
µ ...__.. __..- ...... - . _............... ._ .. -.._ __.
...... . ............ _ . _... _ _ .._._�_..
14 j .i � C:. i" { `•_
IF i .jI
_i n is
[.._
j L
[!�'iy{ (
j�'''`•.
1''•` f .. i - � f t. I `i I A .I. S tF ~I i ` i_ I 1 i • i _. S._
q "f'
4 1 f�, a i., � 4
] p
1 1� t_� 5 ; � a ' i ` 3
,..., ,:.,
z.. r , ��,
e •i� . t :,,
f_J ►'•..! 't t ? 0
:. ,•••f ( � t••1 w
! I .' ,.
f
1 ( j ! i �" E G u 3 L ; "( t i
�.. ..;. � .. .
,_. I�: �' S f ' 1
r' 0 1 .
.4 '' b_. (::, j•
".
t'}
D .I. °' l
_• _ 1. c, ._J
i :� r_ ? ` - i ' •
c "} : . 'I ? 1.
, it tl t.. !s ' .r. �•' . .... Tf a
, :, !:I t�� , •: 1 = L. L. tY �... 'k a
... '• � .. .... ." f ': '� +.,.. ...
- .� .
z
.. .. " -.. ..... _ . .. ............ ... ........... ........_....._.._...
,.. . -..... .... _..__,.... ........__. __..
_.
.
C AL
C: H R E G
C 1 T
Ci F` 111 A FL W Clll�)D
F A 6
0 3 P..) 2
1 G 2
F Cj F.,a
P f--,, 1 0 D 0
A/ 0U C H 1,. _ FR
C 11 ET C I•
V E P--JD 0 R
I TE 'Il
C H EF C 1.-.*'
N U 11 E R
W U 1-4 B'E R
DATE
i'J, A I• E
E C F; "i 10 tt
A 1A Ci U 'I'A T
A •il 0 Li T
L E 6 A L F I :-Z L
1 5 0
1. El G A L. 8: F I S C A L
4 Z F-5 0
1 Z 574�. Z8.
1 8
061120
09/14/192
DA R E; E R C: Cl iNi'EJ IR U CT 10 [-,1
................
Ci F5 3
1 y 5 9 . 2 0
1 '8. 2: 6 9
061650
09 / 1 9Z
B A RT 0 N A S CO hi M A N A 13 13 0 C! . I N C .
F EE: E 9 C O'N U LT 1 1"1 G
4 .40
4 7 75, 4 0
1 ,;,.2'70
06190o
.09 / I 4/'.tZ
B A T 1- E R Y 1 F' f:.- W A f � E 1-1 C-I U S E
----------- ----------
s t..) F PL I E S V E JH I C: L E
17 .97
S Li FP F-' i.. Ir V E id 1 C L f.:-: ------
21 .43
U`PF'L. I V E H I C: L. 1----
U fPF• L i. t*---'-3 V E H I C: L E
4'-) 7'
14 tt
I ;-'-:2- 7 1
0702550
0'-,--t 1 9 Z
BECOWITH INCORPORA"FED
PRC- iJECT 9100 PLAN
14.38
1 .30-3
I '. 3. 7 2
0 7 0 t 6 0
09/14/92
1 I E U RA E
I Is 9 . 0 0
1 9 . 0
1. 3
• 18 0 r 2!---i
t�! , J 1 4 / 9 2
E-.'L- A C K ST C', G.A J. L.
T R* A V E L. T F; A I PA 1 N G
2'. 0 0
} r
18274
080900
0 9 1 4 9 Z
B OA R D 0 F kii ATE R C 0 M il i S 5 10 N E R S
U T i L. I "r 1 ES
45-24
45 4.
I E-32 7 5
0 9 0 5 L--.5
0'.4 1 5-'Z
13FRAD RAGAN 11'4 C
- vi t'v - .i L � ««
:, �.� . 08
202 08
1 .2: 7 6
0 2 0
0 9 1
0 F-Z F� A I •-!,G I E
V E i 11CLE: AILLOWA-WCE
1 4.
VEHICLE' ALLOWANC.E
16.64
Z 0
I Z 7 7
101400
0 1 Z
B-UILDERS SQUARE
lyl A 1 It TE 1 A [-,I C E lil Al" E R I A L
5
2111 50
l'-I A I f.,i "I" E kl A;*-A -.,'-'E tyl A "V i I A L
1 3 3
18 2 7
101800
0 1 P? 2
BURLINGTON NORTHERN
viAT"ER f'-'iPE* I- ` �::. � "`. tt i .� �?
�. i ; p ��} i�}
ST Ff PI S EE 14 R P I PE L N 1 N 13 FE R M 1 I
10.00
ZO.. 00
1 8 7 9
101860
09 / 1 / 1.? 2
BUS I NESS CHO I CE NET 140iR K
"f* E L E F Fi 0 i1i E
15 0
0
1828
1 10 150
0'---� / 14 • 9 2
C . C . S R R 0 14 C: 0 .1 P.-I
S"'. Li F IFL 1 ... ... ....
11 .16
1. Z 8 1
110180
0 9 1 4 /9 2
C-MC I L
FRCIGRAtyl SUPPLIES
4 1 77
411 7 7'
1 10 4 0
0...? r 1 fr 9 2*
...........
C-AF,L.'SOI EQUIPIYIEI-,I*I'
[4 A I T L-.--. N A C E 1• A 'f f-': F'. I A L
1 7
I 106C)9
14
C A R V 1 L. L I "f' I fil
F? E. F: U 14 1) -- P () G F? A VI it El G 1 S T F E E 11
t5 C) ()
1 21.'8 4
1 10 8 5 0
09/14/ ;Z
C ATC Ci
REPAIR 1
447 .78
J F
4 4
E
1 .9.3
- - -- _ - -1 <C ___ J .. �_. ._:_ -c _ ,.. -:= — -- -_ - --- � - -- i .._ - -- =__ � -- - r -=_,� °` —�� _� ,^»,...•- ^'•max•
j
0 U f': H E:. F� !f
P
::.1 l._. k-. r,
. E_. , J ._ ._ 1
:. i"
t... l :. k -1:
t= l._. ?':f ::;? ...I l
� t =i
�" ;:�!
� E �• '
......
j'
� I 1 l l 1'.
!
1 I ....._
•;� `Y L.. R
... .... ..
1'� f i T� �.: .
_...
} ,:� �
ti '1`
_
i.:. •, r_, i . » Y_1 -_i. { hh
- A r t 0 1...: 1 ,1 ..1..
.._ _ .
::
J� M C", LJ N 4
,", .. +. •"
r .,"1
t:.. ` f "' t r
t_ + `' f �,y{ / ' "_
. 1 1
• } ... �' `
... .. 11, t 1 ...• 1" `� ! 1.r} 1 '� t« !! '` J •�!
1..• � ":. ' F e _. «} �.
t ( 1 1 1 C E fir( t� i
1 !L! •Y
�) l ti,� �1.� 1`I F"t c.... 1 , .L , �.
._ _ '_
•� „ « „
.._ _..._ _....____._.._.. ._ ._..._. __•_.- _.•_' _ _. _.. -__.
- _ _ ... ....... ......... - __._._...._
..... _.
«. _
„
- - .
1. 3 _ _ ,. _
t «i . 4 9 e..
4«• H A «: E I 1' '• i A
V E H I A L LC N A N CE t .._
1 4 . 04. _
• — � i - --
1 `=+ 1.4.5 t_
t-t , , 4 % 9
( • 1 T Y B U r -'.1 1 1 E i- S'
r, PE r, ' ,{ T' i I r
1. ' �+ •' ' :' {_�
s _
I. r.F :L ` +_t { "}
t..} '.•'' f 1. °� r '. r ••
!
r . �•-� i _ i it i - t 4 . t 1 ^• i _.� .., i i "� , t i .. i f
1 `I 1 ' J 1 t !. � '_ F` I ' ". R r� � 1 ki
�.^ t i t t,,,, t 7 i _, ,,, { { [ _ }y� �.•
_.' U f' �-• L .1. � , E �. U' .i 1 i'1 i.._ !
�•
� »� 4 • t..l 1
_
.!. � 1. �'{ �� �
{ J' «7 /r �+[ �
t_
�. j � ' �' • .... « �..� ,,,; �, . t1 .. 2. _ tw �
« _. '. (•� «1": �� flC I.1 }��: ��.f :�, 1N
y « .,. ., � .:
0 S IDE REN " r 1 :'}"-
l ! 1
- _ —_-_ - - - -- - -.
- -
, { «-
{�li; „ t i . «)
- ---- -- --- _._.. —..
.100
_
�. '.�+ _ '. -' z:...
�. I,,,1 r : '.,.'r I _i
i~} ' '' f r r f '.« e:,•.
Cl '...• 1"": E �; I- A ! 1 1 1: , .. P« i r ` «.• i ;.
,_• � 1 "' �-
,,: ' � Ir
_ � F
.1 'fir r
'
• -,
n
Ft {•
�. 1 ' *
;1
i ._� 1"' y E 1 �. !'" ._ r t. Jet T I. N C �. t t:,: i_it p
: L P P I ,_7 "_I ;
::
t...
-„' -1 • ;• `'
_7 , �r 1
4
,!. f "' f.. .,,F 1 _ i {
{ "f ? 1 "•1' . r • _
(( 0 - } 1. ��t (t� ` .1,1 '�}'' E � ` ' i
1. �" 1" +� i .. 1,Y
p " i "_ 1 3 �.•_ .. p p ,... � '{ r t ••� RA - - -- --
F l..i 0 6"j R A I !'z E G I t..f i F �_ E f J
--1 -
4 „t
� .0
_
� «� o d 0 0
lo o,
1 80 1 CI f
o9/ 1. 4 •
C 1 '1'
tit "i +�
9 2 0 0.0C)
�. ': "' :.... ' �..•+
.j} t
�. *.�.+ l .. ? J. �. t "`
� r 1
t..F %' 1 f :'' 1�..
� C �t
v • P
DENTAL CLAIMS -
=' " =f 1 {��.'.:;
P
':` 10
P
�+ ZIP
-
_ + t � 4 i
.. .. ^ .. .
_
t i' :' �' � ' -� ��'•
� r 1«
�( y t
D A L_ C i,,,l
�,:: i /} 1,:.� {F••• i (r �« S i yi• �, ;� M
J 1 ._! i . L. I ' L E �dt�� U L � ,._ !� �
.
�� - A' yf
P 4 • I
.� _..._ ,:... t_.
._ '...+ • "• •.. t - )
4
•.: ! 1 ! .�
I
! r I •. 1.... .._. �"
4{ i } ` S '�j`' 1
' { f T� ' f , 1 tt ".t .... L... ..- 1 Y .! ( i..'�
L. 1 :..t
^' f - -t �.. P _ - _ ._ . ..._ ..r_ _.
'r t « � r ", 7
n
.. ... ..... .. ... ... .. _'. _ _ .. P _ « ...... -... ..
' "� ti. :. `.;. ..:
, -•, , - t 1 t i
t..' '. r J. 4
7 .} fi'{. L.= �. ES � lAl � � t ::.. ! L � .... J 1"' 1 •� i.... S
;j N AM � t } . 1:... F A M A
.1. i
O ' � 1 4 a� ' `0 1 t:
f 1 A V -1 �" � N _1 E �' i" � : R `f
1` R �...� l7 s R ` ,' ! � �"..!. T R A f � �t { � �~
j
1 00. 00
+: "t .::t F. �
,: � I, • t •:.� � { }
I t `•.i i :' r_1
T j F ,_ ' � •' r ••! i
r .. , ..., _ .. »'.� .... .. ..... .. .... .. _ -.. ...... .. -.._ .., . ...,..�`
�- F f_:; {._[ f' A lyl . F f L_ I L '�'t
............._......... .__., ... ,... .... .., _ ... ..,.. .... w.. ................... •.. ...- ._....,.
... _... ,..... _....._..,.,...., ..... ..._ __.. ...._ .... - ....._ ._..... -. .
: _' •«+ 0 a
i_ t _ t t ! . i f
! ) -� 7 e
T � 4. R ! ?� � �
1 ; 1`' A It 1 'r i r'•
r f - s
p ! t • t
c 9 1 ':•r ice
' f-4 Yi f I"'� I � ! i 1 �..i 1 r.,'1
� • R 1 ... ' l.3 i , !t.i 11 i 1 1 1 f :.+ P 2 � 1W a..!
L
�, fws p � i t «i
� l::r � ��
_ P
-1
1 i `'
., ; : 1
s r ! L � `'J -
t_, -: , : 1:
e ; •• t -i•• tom•• - t r ; - �
,� +.:.+ 1 _, T } f L i : A f - ( !�1 ._: t�. _
1 ..
'�. U .- . l: `.=� `.` t- _ j -
._
'_�'_ (_ F =` 1~' !_ I F- t E } 1 C L l�
. •' Li I 1'•' L I E. S V_ 1 Vi I • L t'
14
t ..'. 1
0 ' .'� ! 'T t . ,:«
L.. L tMi ! 1 L. ft F.? t..! 1 .. I.. !. {} - i_ - ^t i1 Y•.. ..�_ �{! :? f i...
'....+ 9.J »' J. f ' .V r .«. 3^. i i i 1 .i. i " t 1.. �'i t~
. J. p '!' ._'
'i C `. "' .. t
._ •..! t_� �.!
,.... ` {.: ,� •! '•.�
t..$ : � ! i. r `'� ! ' r ` ,�..
L. L J. i . fl r':•
i F .. t .. „ -.. i��. ��. �:! P i i._. ._.. ._ .. ...... .... _. ...... .... .....
. -.. .... _......_.... ............... '- .. .. .... .....
...- ..... ...._ ..... .. _. ..... .. _ .. ....._...
_
, .,.,.
t
•; • ••, s �
:. ... .. •.: 4
': ! t 1 t t � i't
,:_ •._ • "• •.: ! •.:
_
i ,"} % •1 �
'
t.: r' ! .�. ' r ••' 1_..
;,.,
I':1 i.s ." �.' .._ ��. f t "� 1 ''• �'+ , t �.; .r !Y'1
_ '
i .., r ., �._ I , . ,
_ -
,.� .: i .._ i f �.. i-t
L r �
-_'
.
.
.. i:`' •, :i t_� i i
._
;.. ,
.", i"t 1
L_ ... .. ... ... .:
{ ! f a.i. f ! «f ,._
.: r
` j ( 1
i _ '1
L t� �.... i "i L. t.., 1 : L,,, ."l 1 I
S 3 t�
L. A . i i F �. i� 1 111" 1 ,rS , p .....sl {•,
f t ., t _. .•f I 5...
- lu. 1 '
1
�Y"••'•�
V 0 U H R E
te�
.... I ,- * ; ,- 1 �*, 1 , .: � r - � .. !--- W A tJ i.- _
L. I y A r' L iz K". 'E.- 1
I f v (j j.. `f T -C.'
... ... ....
V Fj U C: H E R
•
C* F! E_ K*
V E i D (_J R
•
V E N C' R
I T
N U til E R
N U 11 E I R
D T E
i`-1 .M
D C R I T I I.) N
A lyl :3 1i i- T
A rill LIU 1"4 T
1 4
FA LC. CIN P R E'
sj i-I :j •
45
8 Q 45
1 E-3 3 10
... 2* 'T 0 150
.. .... .... ..
0 5; 1 9
-----------
S_
F L A I L M A S T E R C 0 R P i") F' A T 1 0 N
�3' U P P L I E S V E H I L E
4 11' 8 0
13' Li F 1"' L. I E US- 11 ItH Ff
7
S A I - E 131 1 A 1% f-' B, L u U T F* F A'T E
:.-'T
0 5 0
09/14/92
FLEET TECH SER V I CE (_ORP o
R E F.", A I R 13b. t A i N 4' V H 1 LE
R EPA I I M A N T `VEI
H .1 L
------ ..... r L E
157 F5 0
J. 11
0 10 0
C) "1 1 5--
GALL I N
:3 U F" If" L 1- Eb t t . . t U I irll' N "I
E
34 i's 0
J F` F; L I L----' E Q
4
13
3011`5
1 4
GAN"EL, CnEROLDINE
R E F U N D - P F` 0 iGi RJA M R E G I B T IF E
5 u 00
25 .00
S. 1 4
t •L i }
0 1
G E N f" L A PFL 1 1`4 T V
rk, -it
F E G 11 1A F I E D R.J
. ........ P . , .......... ..
15
1 "" 5 11 -2:-
0 D I N 0
E Q U I N T
In,
161
3 .11 Q 0
09/1 4 9 ;2.0
601-IDYEAR 'TIRE 1'.'.'OIy1f_ ANY
R FIR 'Sf: 11 A 1 NT V E H I L E
1 75
tyl A I N11" VE H 1 . I , -.
C
3 .8-
R' I• "PA I R I IN V A i i L E
VZ E P A I R lit ' A' I )`A E H 1 L E-
141 'S.
1 • 17
10 6 5 0
0 1 62
G 1 i F"-' H E R D p C 1 S',
AL
J U L "Y' I R f Y L 11`4
1 3 4 .00
12 3 4 0 0
1 113-:3 1 ;31.
0 711 Q 0
09 1 4/92 GRAC DUANE
------ --- ......
----- - U I L D I N k 33 1 1 `4 • C T R
%jo
1 t2 7 .
1 3
09 1 12
GR F I t
H 0 P I F'
E
R I F` M 1 1`4 T V E H LE
r
L
. .... .............. D 14 J
. .......... .... ..
1 1-:31 321
4 V
0`9 1 9'02.
A
`R AY B'014 D N I EL 31 CO.
f E'_ P A 1 R 1'31." till All NT if B 1- 0 t".3 R 11 tj D_
-0 IJ
U F P L I S - E Q LU I I PIA E 1\1
.15 t2_' 7
16'
GROUNDSKiE.EPER y i 1% C.
M w T ly:
iii C-i W A A N T L ► F 1-
4 ' �, i "}
LOT U lyll 014 E D
4
7
3 0 5 9`15
09/1 4 1 4
G R U Ei 0 W
F IER EQUIP11ENT
3 , p F :.,, U 1`1 E N
r I E S E t
33 0
-.:13 0
.3 5: 0
1 4
1-11 IN E :1 J H N R
3, ..
. 1 .... L I ` F : F J
L 0 C' A T 1 10 1 y
15 (D j
.
i_f ` ': 1 7 P;
3 5'"'
1 4/1
H 0 L. M BE- -i j L A D 0 N
'R( -%J A
R E'Fli N 1E." F: R Gi R" A III R E-E F E
0 .00
5
3 ff, 1 4 0
4
HORWAT-H T C1 M
T R E E I F" E _I N
3 1) 4'C*- (` C
1") 4 -0
.7
H U
-
R E C. u •I I Ilk! E
I •i i'•'. !mot
F A E 1j
Cj
4
7
0 199
0 Q 1 4 2-f
I c:
5 50.
1' i �,..� (` ti...� °�. 4_• !:�
iy J . .. ^. .,
i {
�.� ��• 1Y F'. i I.... 'F i''.!
r..l L
V C! U C W E F ; " , r f
r
1 - :i U IN E.." E_ r•.
li:l U M 'B E :: E
ID �� I E
t :l � =_. i " �:
L' E ::� _:_:: � �� � 1�t "i !: C. 1`1
1fk F�1 ►::1; } l "�� T
A l'tl 0 i 1 1' T
I � t, - , • t
,wt t...t t :•�
•.,
.. -t! j � _.,+ .
i «� .4 7 t t
�r t { ♦... � 1r .j {1-" jam} {{ �T•'�•T,t ..` � .. .. ... .. ._...
, , t ,.t f { ,w T ... ��1 4r 1 ! �. , '..
_.ti_t.. . .... _ " � ^�_. ... .. .. ... .._... .... _ '_ ._... _ ...__•_•__•_- ..__�_. _.. .___- ._._.__....
fw 1 - w. M } [
C E
-_.._,.._._ _-"_ -__. ,. ..___. ..
rt^
-) _ -__
t ^, -,;+ :�
�+ 4) •^{•
- ) 9/ 1 4 . ;� } r_
jr jr � t [ � ^, t ,_.. .� `.. ( () �(
= 1,,%'
J I ! (:: r' t f ,, ! 1' 1tl 4 `I
...T, j t..t i,;'; 't r ) f�'T t i [[ pp B'11- f� ( ",1 t"+
l J ! t , I F � !�l :.! +:. �l T . i � �� �! 1'� � k e f
i'; � # � � � "j
`«'
_ "
t"t .. .. 1 •{
4. s 3 ..t i }
1 .•r t:
J !'� h '•� 1"... i.... «J 'F IN
• }
' �
L �._ �..! .w L„ ! r.,� !_! .. •I
d 3
1
f n ... 1
I R
4 i'i t_3 7
« «
i ' «) i. � +
.+ f 1 � t:..
4 �"'i �'^s !«. f i Z , r ,. : �
J €hl i I % �i � ... R l t! 4 F'� T 1 ...� 1 ... � ..T ! E. 1' l to
+• _.._ t
.`�. l ... .. _,{••.. t ... ._�. •t ... ..... ..•_l /._ ._...— ._.......- - --. . f R
C. i , f L' S � (�`• C l ` E L: T 114 E 1 E R I C - T
65,0
T E L E l- H i. "!
tot 5 i_1 r 7 tyt
: 3 3 1
t
a f . r ,
`�
t} 1 1 } t l ::l ; "� 'w! ? l j 1 t._ ` ^ ry. _r ,� ._.
( G l
1 {: Fd ." _,! ! ' {. R -
T E: lyl P O , A IFN C L_ F.." R I !~ i; L S l'.. F -' V I C lr
1 :'' Vim. p i_t f_)
FART 1r 111E W � l� r:! -
� fir' : n ti0
TE1`+lF 01`, AR`," ,: L.ER I+' AL EF.'V I CE
144
F.. L' F' T lid �
C ff
• a
� 1 r{ e J
4- . ��? i�;
is -t / I -� f :'�
} T F` �-� �. T
;_; U 1= �~ 1_ I _ �� — !�! r F i E
1 = i a ':
' f
_+ .. t
_
_ . f 1 ` f / f'1' �:
J 1 �.. . I Ft RI 1 1.E
F` Fl L - I E ti? t_! - .
E
7 :
1 „ t
`t
U P P L 1 E - f i ! F F' I C E
, tit
, e f«,T.
'•»'
w,t r��
{_� !, ;) i�)
i:� . :�� i = ::'
' «� f :� i_
- i : }, j t j j
J 0 I 1 Tl �:; !_� 1 H l._ �w' �.11 ..� 1 . �_! i» _f q �. r`I'•_
_ °t j r� _ s y� _'N j "("
_+ �J 1 �' l_ � 1� J �. � ! � «1 � C 1'l �. I'A [
, '.! �►
a ,
r ' =t - ^,
4 0 1 : t 0 0
0 9 t' 14 1 ':t ,:
JO T `r X41:.. F A V 0 RS
F r R 0 G R � lyl r U F P L I E 1
:�:..�:
L w n0
RE 1 L HE L1 M
qi 0 qs
i. ... �_ •�* i
r 1 i_� 4 ''� 1
(! . 1. al . t�
(
i'•. i.. F! 3 A ? 1 •
.._ L "f ..F E l F ... i'� R ! w � •T fir` �. �._ � °.�
i ; t r � � 1
l�il {_' � t•... , T J. � t L...
_� «? 1
{_ f , '.« n i" t..t
_..} .... 1. i'Z L !' i I • 3 i'
ii •,`� • .' i�r
4 10 ��+ 10
0 9 f 1 4 f t � r C..
i •. �' ! _. ... +... � F.� [ `t.t� . _ .. ... _ - ... ...... -. _ .. ... .....
-1V E H t�.f ......... . ......_- - - --- --- -----.._..__._—.___..—__---.._..-- ---^._—.---------- ._-- ..— _-
_— ._-- --- --'-- '-----3 ... ty a 00
760 u 00
;�z is �
' °r ;� 1 i `. »' ��
` 1 h>r •. 0 C O P I E
F` ! I L L I : #-! 1 P-
1 0 ' : : _ : t' 5 `
rr.
�.. !..} �"= L. �. �; t'"! I �•_� �.:1
_ ;., •E,:. p � � r _................_.........
.. ....... j T 5
f t t ( J
-
w - t
.. .
t { y. • • r t " 1
A •• 1 7 l)
f i ,
7,
_ _ _
`. I... i "'• '•• • t
i S { tom• ,,
t"t
1 �
J. I
.! i'1 ; ^ r _+ i_�
i
»� `:r t' 1 4 / 9 "
1• •. !w� 1 T �.} ., ,, ��1 I f L � �' F�1
�' �.. N D ` F: 0 qtr, F, r' 1�� �'
«., � •�
1 0
' ` !•_` _� ( �_t
�'} ?" 1 ''t . °' ,.
l' = :. _f �'' �f �-1 t_' .i �'t l - . ,t ;t,► j:
' !: "! !� }+�j 1 j -; ' j (� {
1... ..� i::J �'�. I'i 1 ": �� .t ` 1 R :•k • 3 1 � � I � 1 :: �
0 a CIO
t�• i_� p 0 i « t
d i . '•:l.._ J
`.f. 5 #_ J 1 1 : 1 ...
�..� ' ' i .�. :i.i: { `�/ t:_
a ..
�~ p E p 1 s I••'1
t ...' ..
R J • M ' E L R • l M �•.�,
A I G �
aj° l
_•j T«3 ,`•e a •j ! ma y
7 t` iy
_
4 f • i i f 1
... ... ft .. .. -
4
tti 1 f f �^, ( «3
(+ r : »l "
l»i
! 1 1 l +� l !^ «'
-:" E L A
f ^� 1»t F + _ _ E'
�: t
t
• 1`1 ._t 1 F"'
�._' } •_) _t '-
'..1 I ': '_?
; • .. � ., i .. t `... .. , �,
1 _ L {._1 i':. «t +t l`,!
... {'; 3.... 1 '•i '._? F• .' ?! !- ... •'. ._.+
t ...3 • , t
- 2%. ; B E l_.l
.... _ t '.., ... + '1 t . "t
«' ' :. l «_ ! _, 1. f
1 r ~+
1. t _ : + l' r -+
-� +w+ i_ t_r ' f c�=
t: i ':'J
1► • ?_ 1_i : 1 �.. !.� { r - ,
i .
r ,.« _ :_•, , ,• �•.
;7
f 1� j t .; :e t . F� 1 l !.. l °� t t.:: p t L.. `! i.'.. ! tJ it .L « _
! '
t� �« i
.. +_f
n E �
i j ^ ;• (� L�, try
.� t S f j R E G
�.., '{ i ;s�
s I! i
}_= F #ii �r t i._. iwi ! —# } _i !
'- f t
!' f`. s.3 1 t_
r
Cl t. 1 ,� „i r f,ra
{
1 •'• " { '•
' !r -
�.: I_ •. ' -
�.
_i U E I•" I E R 1
I EE L C I
_
t_ # -I �:1:
J _ I'•i ._. _ #
I T L'
it.#U Ea R
N U!v i f-' t E R
#..j A .. 1 . 0
# E
DE ::.3 { ^:RI N
AM
A N0U#`4 - 1
t ! ` r' ; 14 f 9 2-
M A U M �� a
�i A �� L ! ` T R A I N '[ P 4
4 8
t - `
t•••1 0 o 5 0 0
(
� "� 9 f 1 � / .f
{ i
. S . 1_E t E. �
j E
l � 0 1 41
7 6 ""
9 3 F !
49 ';., .r + :•
_l
1 4 ': � �:
N a # a I a D I f •- #- Ft I B U -{ . I 1 C' O .
' t om .+ 1... F 1 ` L I V Eh :f L L. L
i, i ^i '' {
1 M_ ».
�1 E ti l t . — ` ,
t { �
~ 1 _... , _
� i ,;;} •�
» ! . r 1 4�.
t f •s "•'• , »•, :r ,� ,4; ; ..
M A I E R E3 T L W A R T +:.t: A% ,..I 0 ...- .
f ,. ,, ` j�
E.,.E U�' I D L L N G 1 N L E R 1 1�� f-i #~ �. � .",
88 - .- r
� {:F �
0 ! #! S I D #_:. E N I NE E R 1 Eel !.a I`' E E:.:,
4- 7 6, 7 4. 0 5
••r ,� 5 :5 i_} . 0 9
~1
1 1
_1 1 1 _ = 1 _
�_� . ` 1 4 � . ,_
MAR 1 I E .# �, i ~ 1 N , �_ . LI N U ,fit
F - R Cl Cl R A lyl I � E G I � � R r, •T� 1.1 [l F ��. I -
t�)
E,. !!
1 ,M, .Z' .
- WI •�} i ,1 �
�..� • 1
' f -r ' +» Z
0 j f � ^M r{ •� ice
t, % �• ; i •
�� � � N f't �t 1J w1
L r r} i , w-
� {�1 f � � 11 i'�1 !' i Lt �...f �' �` �".. I C:.:!
q
~t _1 4
_ :, i 300
E_) � � r °i '
t:..
M E:. i �`� 1_I � , �. t, V s
1 I'1 •..'' �'^ E C 1 � N �1 C. !_..
f -
E L. F.... �• #- #"4. .� '' ! L I N E � «` 1.» ._ « E A � i._� #
-
�, ,� ,_» • ., ��+ .4
-�+ ,� ,:... �t tom+ u 4 �_t
— ::- .: j 5
t 14
lyl t
1 � �; ' "; `—' 6
5 to 123 5 1
C .) 9 14
M # J P L Jet N N 1 #%] A 2 ":; !� t C I A T ION
E 0 0 K' y
4 0.00
,� `
0 a 00
I. ,,,,t ._, 5 7
. , T {_) 05
..— --- _.— ----
C :, 1 14 � :r 2-
-- - ----
t'1 L L E E Il L l; N L Y ^ S Y 7" E M ,�, , 11'tl C: r
R E' I'« A I R rri A I rte T C H I I_. E
0
(D)
�.
iii ..i •._t i;..i
f .. [ {..! {_! ' ;..!
_... - - -... T-
�.) +. ! f ': t ,:..
'
E
E^f �.::J E� L. # L� ._i f a
.1
r{ 4 is EM' I T # i i ' C i I
t' tt E' . _.
'•_+
-
- —
IyI ,` 1 t' ! E N A t ii E t A L-. E A L
� i 5i . 9 1
ILIA INTE NANCt ty#ATERIAL
50. fit+
; 3 v st ='
1,_,, _� w1.
1 0 (! . f.,
j_! , / 1 � t . � 1:r
-- - - __
G E 1=i # � I C: F :. IY# E_E # � �� EwE �
V H 11_ L. E.. A L i i ; ; ; C. E
!_, 0
1 ' { ! t_!
{ 1 . � / 14 / 9 1-
MC I I E�E t 3 >i# t `;
'i Cl "G " . r'� .. {,' t? _ 1 ``;
_ _ _ _ ..._ .. _...
) ;..! i _ }
- ..._. _... -_.... _.. _......._......... _ _._ _....... _ _ ..
_
_ .. . ........... .... - .... „....
630745
09 ? s 14 t f ' ��
i
i �� A T 10 N A L �' I R [.... P R E.•. T L C " I " 1, . � N A »J s..! N ■
L . 0 0 1 �. ""
1 • ' T '�+ t..+
1 ''•' '�' • � •.'
1 4
} }
t �• ��
R `-- ._ .. , i • : . T i k 1 .., - i i P_ f +�� N -
1 6 r 1 n . F' � ^ +' # I N � i'9 s_• �:. n i' �:. E:ti E { .L �'•' l L. 1 sl f
f,�t',,,1 u � -) t �
-
[w, �} u (.• { « j
C i.•t 1 �..!
~
+ I
_) t ; i "�'
,
N {._. i•"sl # A N :.J !. G �• r
t .«
`..! '4 `. !.ti: s.
u
, , 4 4 9
!. ! �t _, �.,
r } i,�, I ! { ti t
{) '; t r 14 f '� `
'"
N O t� # H s _t �" P A U r . �, 0
t» �• S �. #=
r.,
(.1 # l L I i^ 1
�.•
1 y 1. o {») a �. f:,
r
1 � 1 c 0
+_t rat 1
r�, 1,, 1_! ��; iy) 0
{«} t f a. 1' ,•
0 R _ � s u ^' �.i L: `� �_i
j �. r ,
i , 1 • i j
1
!�, ,
r , r i :t { •
0 t , / r "`t I �.' i.:
t
1��1 E."E I ! f s J i ` . F � �•
R TURF , I N u
t . , i �, ,
i�E t� � #� T E:. i �l �� N •: E# 1 A T E FZ I A L
T " D
;.+ �,+ .40
, f ' `
�' r 8 40
�• ~►
q � ,! u
„
1. »,, ?~ "t t ,
rat t t_, 1 r »., « E
c_
� ! ~r ,t Z
_ r '1 �l i
+ «+ i {=
t�l 0 � T I - I:.• � ^� N A :t t' � A »:, I I`•a i.:.
, «.
� � i I �I " "•
l -' t
i•
I r.
�' . i [ _ t.'.I
_ .f i. ' }: i�i
i - [i ; F" L E �tf i_' i.. i ?
�` 1 ._i �° j
' T E
1 i
i ts.' t 7 1_.. L •.
i•t[ 14{
t.! [li j i 4 I
7{..,
� � � i F —! �._. i •t
9
; ! !', t
5
[•'• r'+. r "!.�.
I !�• i .•i
/_f i.... v 3 _: �' S. �'••1'�
P. !. '._1 S. � [• %
S l T
i ' S I
Y iii f«J [ T
.
...
... • .
,M ,, j • r +j
0 , 1 i. 4 ! "' r:_
•
{1i ._ .. .. tr '[ + _.. t .,',y_ » f L .., �•' _ C-
t �S � i F T i1 �4 I.... ..-i i �' A � R ,S.
j i g .. �
. }'{ _. _ { _ f - -- ._. _ _..._._
�• � �.,i 5 ,..� �Zt r'{ !'f
........_._..._._--- -�- -•---- -- - ----- -
-_._._— ..._.__ —.__ _ ....._. _ ._._.,_ __..._ _ _ .. _ _ .. _._.....- ----
...__ -, . __._ . ____- -_ �_._�
. l "' 1 1
T ''� { �
{ f t- f 14- /9 t_
Y `" O il P U L� L. I : � d i d � � 0 [;[ i —' t � t�[
r' �' i . � sw
rw .
' ,� t e � .j
t�
� n .
,. ..
.;
; -
{�i ; +' , .� ' `::, ,_
/
_
Cl -+ ' L t T ► [ i s
_ _. i• . t_. S.: E r t .[ ['•.
t 5 •T
i_i !fit . _
F r tai i t ' (�i [ =` F tai T i i .1 i °I
-
I F
77
6 ._ • = t ,
^, .F i^ Y { »! C!
E S « J j z [ 1 "J r
i» f i ! 1 ( i Y ;: r~f a ! i i Y t ,L L.
7 4 3 -� V 1 { G f �` �j�
{ �t
—
'_ ' °� t
! »i {..! {�+ f�(
{_� ' "'' , `� ._
••. .. a
F i i t t t t? .. I' E
A �.
.r
�� r. _ i r'
' i.« .
,� s t
f
i }
t en r f { l "f
{ { 7 t } 1' °' (•,
j j C; j'
14 /9 t
t ^' r••� i .ti i � E [ ••f., E � r ,., � ••i I` I t I l L
F � = i S "I i'�' } I i i 3.. S � .S. f « T ! r }+
..
�• r - t . f t
{ { F e"r ,
t 1 4 � 2
A ! •, .L :,! JA !� A t N
S�•_+ � i._i �.t t •t A M '� E. ( i..t ''_.! 1 '.. T I ... N
t E ..,.. ..,. — _
_..
20.00
..
.tt
rat ._t
.4 t ` »` F
J r t +,
i t } t ..t i�7 t I
.. q «.
{ `:� rf
1 4 1 ' . r:._
F ` P »
1
S.,i 1.. « i j ,.
,...
ri i { y
t..! Y t r S 'M`
i I �i
1
['t[ ` WB R
.
f • i
3
', 5 - 10
!. + ' •:_' i =�:=
1 1 C) {�!
` 1 1 t 'f r:..
C)
F i"4 i...! T %._i .-: l • T 0 " I
i i 0 y+ C " r
r , i 4
- It --
tr >.. t
t.
._ ...
•_
.L t.— 1. i
` : • 3 ''t' + '. `' �..
,;
- _
1.... ! i +r C. ��F� L tJ S i i f C 1 L� L
• ''j, - i s , ,
F:, 1.... �' 1 I R =.t: �� l • i 1 � _ . .L (._ ...
[ 1
t
._ A r... ...
..5...
1
i
t .[ �[• , .1 t .
R . I l � ". '. _ �, [� �_! {''. � t T . I_ I [ ii . + ► ._ n
9
_i { '.. __ �
-'
f n f
l t ` !
U ':'` I d f i' 1 ' �' i
P R � �'- F E � L �� E D R' .L � »1 f'•. 1_. ii � i� r»! ._! L T !? N t ',!
Zj
1 E i W S '«. ! Cl [4 23 U L T I ['t G
f o . 00
•y' »( 0
= [ _
» r ! t t_
[ +.: "• ». F 1 � . !':[ , j I L. L .i. >~ [�[
J
14 [E H _ ! .'
_ �. ( � _ �(! _ �_ _ � i l•_ L
-
F
_, „ � �
r
_' n 4. 1
,,_t ,, ,,.,_ .
i ' i :. 4 t { [
.•
{.} r —r 1 f ` . t i.:..
R 1A .�. N 1_� i—D ice! _ 1)'
F R i... G A M S^ f ` [._.
P ' t \ i i 1«7 ,`' 7 1 t 1 '
4
t:1
1 t A M _ E t' ': i, _I i :i T Y D A T A [ —' R S t'•
a A T A = i. :4 f -' ; ": E � ` i "• _' t EG J U L t
' -; ,`_
4 r_ � 4
fZ
s r..
I- E A F' 1 ":3 C A L.
I 1
f A rw
YY j,
i
i • } , A 1 .'t F 'C i ':..
i
7 , f ;.., t ! { t
L
{ ! 9 f .L 1 ' -, s_
t.i, '
i'� r =f t i ' 1 R ! f* * ' D i''
f — ' r �
LE, G A L. = F I t: � � fit, L
�..� ;�; d :
j t: 3 !
1
F S. t.-., t_ 0 R 5..�•� I t C' F i_. i.,. tJ
"e ��� t t
»y
i. _: •... ' +_!
( S "s i ", { !
_. _. ... ..
1 4 ''1
.. r f ,...
)..{ d _ if [ I_ [ i i i n
f Z.:. .'•. _. •_.• � •. i ... i._ 1 (. -. � }.�. [; ::.! •.... _. ..
i f L i` I . i +� [ i '' ' i t G ( F EE""
i. � �... ._ ! �._. ._. i �_. si i ». E t _f.
i
}_
R' i._i A D Ft' i:: ..s ... s .
! ; � � P, — :I � y !.: • ri, + �� � I L 1
`� U i`' i .� L, I E" r i ". Vi•µ 1,, � � 1 F' it �.r . i �
,M !w
s , ._r n :
V C L.. C- V1 ''•: "G
�.: J. I • `i •
i. i C i i=► F !._. i :. F`�i i_ i i_ � �.,
i + `3
... ' •_: i _l ":•
t »' r� :' C_.
• -:• a •-;_
1 i „. a t„; l._.
i !
V } ,_i� �... « - t
t r_ t r•. .; .. ..... ,...
�._• j L:. i. -• !'': �. i..� .-1 L. t
_... __. ._ _
�_ � i.:. ! • �''•.
....__
V � N S.. ( j•'t
___..-- -._ -._ __- __----
� H , i t..• �'•.
..__._... _._ _- ___ -_ - ... ..........._._ _.__.._....._ __- . -•._.. ...__...._....
`J E... i''.f j } t,.� !'l
...... ...... ..
,.... 7.
_._ -- -� -- r • - -..__._. ...___._.._._._.
T E
_ __.._--- --- _.- _.__.- -.__._ �-- ---- - -----
! 'N U N E; S ». f 1
l � j._.' ... ! 1
D Pi T E
i -I '' 11 L
t.._i L.:� {w i � � ”' � � j_! IA
A Mi L) S f 1�-I l
J; ('� } ...j j� 1 I l
'S t i" ' L• 1 L '_ "` E i tit' U I P iyl >M' N T
148
18
w
+ LA
_
•i� , "1 ' -, ,_', _t
- ?' !
1 t_' i ~
.. l f ; -/ '"•
{_� ! 1. 4 J i
r•, i•. , - /^ :. j, ` , -•-
ti_' '« . .{ .. I_� l �'•. + «•: :J J'{ 4 ~ 1
1.... i r {v, t ..r• ; , •:• r•' r,.
. C- ' E f'1 .t _
t .i _ . i' I F t �I 1 1 L. E"
i �}
_ + u " „
1 1 :. 1 7 ) 0
7 �: + 0 ` 0 2
t ~ ` � d 14 � ' : i».
.S �,` r .,s PRODUCTS
ICE �
� �
� U P i ' � „ E S '" 1 _+ � " �. � �
:� � 0 �y 4
A
! i F' i --' L.1 1= ; -" i'1 I F I C E
j , t.J A �.
t. l..! 1 F� L t: t.' j_i ��' t... 1 t
, : _! a �'. (
_
t_} .' i ";
;� : i = f _
i
:;' .. ; L I_l L I }i �,r j j,
{ ':
F` ice° „ .. i .. ill I Y° Ir. t�� . ;:� 7 f; . iwi sal ,'.
l c`F t
t t1
.. .... ....
' "+ »3 21
8 0 121
0 ° l F 1 ! 9
S) i i'+l '• T E' i i i "s - I i" 1 . i
•'
{ F L 7 ` ', C:
U �" 1 Iw = C .: C ��� � Iw
3::.. "#' a �..� � ~>:
�{
,:,« "7' A f •': tom}
3 ^ . ", ••1 ~,
1 ••' .•, 1 - } �„�
- . 1 1
4,•} 1 �l ! -f 1'_',.
r 0 U r 1-I � l l B U'_= I i � � C C i_1 t i =i � f t�l 1 �_ � T j i._� N
S„j ` t:'• t '}
{[ � t _ _, t .., �
L Lw 1..« i' (... ' _ L
i �" f' C -:
L E__ G iS 1 ,i; i S'
J. i«, .., : t '
ti., ••. t •, 1 7t,} 0
t n� `: j' r 1.w•
1 t �j t f T i {4 1~J ` � (' t�'1 L t 1 E T ..,
ir+ r t I '�M :t 1..1
3 [ :.% (... f � j r !, t �- . i t 1 ..
I �1 L.� ° t»� i )' ; iw �..t :L t«J �°St i„ l r
' ... "
•}
.. -
A
1 iy, " '_t 5
_
/ , _ { �)i !_t 5
} ~ j `�j•� 1 '
• i
1
ES i 3 , r 1�� � T `�' 7 l �+ S ERVICES I C E S
J ��{
�1 IR f fi i ' N � D
i�;,S+
9 w+
t .i }�
i t I"... I� :��'''. I f1 � l 1' L i�tl T l R A L .I. l..j
� `�+ � 1 n 07
1 t :r - •' •, � 3 ,„ +
c - J � 1--. t
9 2-
t :} . 4 7 I _
1
• t ,.• � i 3 1 I �: E I :" ••• D tJ j : ..l � '
� j ± 1 _ . 1 : � I t� �-
_';
i .: l....
a t:... .:
`E3 Li F P L.1 t=:. '' -' 0 F ' ! :: '
M I~ I C.., E
1 1 0
,.: LJ 1::: t- L. I. l._ ; _ 01=- F :l C.'
1 1 t ' j C" ;.
; t j °t
...... . .....
,•rI U F' ID L 1 F::: -- Ci F' F' C. F
^� i. s u •3 1.
•T 'T L
•� C, ' ", 1 1
- 7•
1 1 t„� t }
'_ 4 -� + "�
t_I ` :� i 1 I `'
i 4 W
1 F ll ,f
_) 1 a 1 A U L 0 1 1" i t_1 F
�/ 1 } �
1-1 A 11`4 T it jf j}.� 1„
{ 1._. R
__...._ .._ _.. _.__.._.___.._.. ...--
F �� f � i` j ... } E "
y + U ... _
.____._. .___ ....__ ..... _.._.- ...._..__.___.____._ -._.. ..- ___._......_. -_
I• � ',+ 1, R ;-i 1 \ 1 I I I .1 �'�' I-' E �• F' !_t r; F L• Cl C", 0 1 P%l � ' w " w i
1 r ' „t y t ~ � i ~ )
_ .._. _ _
•' 1,
1 _
R ~`. t V t r� j
_
t.. w.i ...1
4
REf- '.. 1+ .l I , l T / c. lei I ` Iii: f4 ' i�
_ _ .. ... _..:_ .._:__..._..._ _ . _.__ _ ___._ .__..__.-
- -.... _ _ -..._ _ ..._ ..__ . _ _._ _ .. ........
. ....__.. _.. _. _._ _ ...... _
1 ''' —' i-' i
cl . », ,�,
i t t�!
c. , a{ t } _-�
j
t:�';� 1 1 �' ' �
;3 T y {' „ ' �'. L L 9 C I T `f Cl I'--
#90 -10 HIGHWO00 STORM SEWER PROJECT
CITY' S � PORTION PER CONTRACT
y i, ; t�; t�► t t�,
w} i,}
t }
t::t ;) t) _
f
4 ' 4 � s "}
I 3�
c' ' °� ,� ' e :j t:,
I C H E A .
,:J 1 ir1 � (, 1�l A I'1 ? � [ �:. C i L n 1 i'� Q
� ' I„ " -' � • i. I �. ;:' . _ ,I x 1 I 11 _ r� 1 �`. t_
� 1 1_� a .. r
210. ._`.
_ 400
!_I
«
1 1 A.i• , r,l t ~ ! �~
1
` !� I J • L�w.
V 1 1 '1 C NI • f `
I U
A E L ' A I l j t•..3
i iw t
j
t 9 Ft Ir'1
��tt .
�. �i 1 1
_
�� �r »i !: :} ::� (
«� `: f 1 e:� ! ' 1 ,
t y r�• ( g -- j t !
,� i t* .• _ 1"i F l . I_ ' , I =� ,_ • n
..... ry; r� �; ..«
I "� c :. ;... .� r .:M' 1' 1 l� l �' I I` . l:� iii l :I. I »` 11 lZ
,-, °:• -
,
, fj �{
'; ; ",
1 .., + ,.. C . i ti i j i`.,
-, 1 ,... _ M t w
61 4 d
- - - ------- --
E
.... ........... . ... .
1:
C I Y
A --I -
C! F ty: L. E IJ
P
f I ."I iE R
I A I T is I1
ra
V 0 IJ CHI E
V EIN D, R
H E
V E N Ci ""i FR
I F I .. : .
I.-I E C,
I'll U Ift E R
tai U M f"; E R
D T E
i`t1 F i ' (�
i' c" � P T I i
A 11C N T
A 111 C-1 U T
1. 4 C 3,
5 575
0':P 1 4
1- E •M "UPPLY, INC
•
S U F P 3 E' :`3 0 F I CE
355 5 4
5 5 5 4
1 4 0 4
0
0 9 1.4,
C,
SC: H I F K Y 0 1"4 S I ill c
T.A. S`_'+IIF31KY 8.1 -3, C-I N ':3
». �,
7 1 1
-r A
. 4 0
q 1-1
T T 'EFI I Fil' 'S
U 1--,' 1 CI F11 •S 'L 0 Ti I Il G
4 7., 2"
9 4• ;'., »I
1. ED, 4
t2'.' 6 5 0
09 1 9 w
TH O MA LLA, DA'V"ID
U N I F 0 R M 'S'
35 0 . 9*7
--':1'5 0 . 1. t
sn: t
4 0
91 0 .1 VZ1,
1 4
j ! j [.:
C H (JI R C H
F Fi, C, F,
R E I-A L
100 . 0
10 0 .. . .......
# _1 8
I c: 4 0 _3
1 ,, 1 -) F- 1 0 1
0 9 1 4
T R A D IkI A Y G-113 Al: -pq I C'3
P F 1,3 R M S I J F I L I I %S
5 5 n 5
t om. 5 n 5
I ED 4 0
80 5
9 1 9 12
T R CI P H I E E UNL I M !TED
P RO RA M U P PL 1
4.'_316 r*_`-5
PROGRAM S' IU P F L I E S T R 07` H I E ES
.80
4
1 84 1
0 rI 0
i
T R Fi Y 1-4 EIM 1 A L 1'. [\I D US T R tb
U P P L 1 E JAN ITARI AL
60 .00
0 . 0
1 4 1 1
%
PURCHASE OF !RAILER
4
4 .3 7
I ED 4 1 f2l
9 011 0
9 1 4 9 2_*�'
TW I N ("ITIES ME TR 0 CH A P T E R
PR JGRAM REG I S'T R A T 1 0 N1 F E E S
75-00
75.00
-
0'-7-1 1 4 1
T W I N - y ! R P 0 FZ'T
R C.:. A I R M A 1 N I" V E H 1 CL E'
Z Cl . of)
R EFA I R M A I kI T V E H I C L E
0 . 0 01
R E PA I R M, A IN'T
F V E H I L E
0 o
1 0
1. 4
f oo
1 4
R E IF` I IF` Iii T B U G J
W
_'43 ,t � r..
us IN
11 1 P I T R 0 U P-J DS
131
4; 0
15
1
09 1 4/92
U V -,- E --, R - --- F _R i " N f - - 1 N G__ F ---- F
-- - ----- V - E" - - 1 Y --- 2 , E R__ — S , _H_ - F , , �_S_
-
0 0
-- - i f -
J. .3 c,
1
51 0 0 100
09/14/ 2
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
U N F 0 R M C L. 0 T H I NG
33 • 50
U I'l I F• FC-1 R t-4 c-3 1:3* C L 0 ]" H 1'.
0 1
U NI FO R'll'-S L I - H I N Gi
5 4. 01
CL 01' H 1 1%,11
U [4 1 F Of" M k3
3 5
1 84 17
P 113'3
0 1 9
V I G .1
-'I*, A L 0 D E L 0 F` E`_31 A
VEHICLE ALLOWANC-E
4 6 :3
T R A V E L z3: T R A 114 1 1, %4 15'
.: a .
7 , r Q
7.8
6
4 1 , i
t�11. of)
05) 1 1 2-
V 11' N G A FE TY F R C_j D I J
U N 1 0 tyl S 'L A T H I N \{
.3, 4 1
11900
0 1 . .....
V I R' C 11 cl W1 K R A 1.1 S 'S_. C 0
-- ----- ---- ---- — -------
C 0 1\1 ':_ rr_.t L T I N F E E S,
1 p 35 n 0
11. 4 Ez 15 0 0
4,,'*- C
j
CL. J
0 ".4 1 44 9 ;2�*
V I S U - - '%-3 E W 1E R L. E A N A INC.
• E A N EN E
T E L I'-- V I R
4 e; 18 5 8 . .....
-
.... 4 5 18 . 5 8
.1.
J E.
W E f?"" R T • 1 1-1 T N C'.
r
R E::: A I F* M.A N 1" E Gj 1. -1 J I I F
".1 1
4. 10 7
0 1 4/9,
kI L. S T F U B L I H I ki (i F-1 1Y F' A N Y
P R G R A r, I IF" 1-" 1 4 IR A "11- 1 N E E S
0 11
100 00
10 0 0 0
1. 4 1* . .. ....
0 1 4 el
Ft U M 0 1 L, C 0
F U E L & 0 L
.2 5 4
2`5 -1
...... ...... . . .. .......
-�
v A Li Cl I._I E
... I��� I:� �_..1:..
� ' � i
'., ��. I`�.� 7� �_• I• ,
i ^• t j:'
�..: I� ;.._ � r'..
f
�:' i:: 1 ; t.' i�l � � .� ..�.. ��. iii
T I ��:: s'�1
CH H E' _" .
.�_.l F � E
V 11 E ~� S ! R _ 0 1
`
' p�
F }F I E -7 L. 0 1 L
F U t f t f FF
.._ ..•. 0
_. ._ .. w «
n 7
,:�
1 i!t ' t' "'f
`-j i n j • 7 f� ��i
s
>L�y •` rj i s: l •� ;•
1 °'( s....
( �r j1 r 3^at �j � ��t A V �._. {� � r T R 7 i d. � � J. � � �
1.._ 1 1 D F"'S s;a: i 1 f-
�±.
i • p i ., i
_. .......
".y! lam` _.._ __... __. ..... -
_._.__. .. _..__..._ .. ... . ...... . _. _.. - ... _ . ..
/t � ,....... _.
i
. �iiTi'GKnAo'.N::.. + .,y..a ., :'.7:cid +'.F :1� 1- V
.. ,. .. f of , J 1 c,-+w t.
CITY
GE 1 11APLEWOOD
QQ(
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS
AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHEC
--
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
i
I E f 1
} } } ` - - - . - — _.__.._
t„j!'
-
m
0( )2818
08/28/92
DALE CARLSON
267,63
0026184-
08/28/92
GEORGE ROSSBACH
267. a 6
7
,
BAST - AN
304 15,
30 28 188
0 8/28/92
FRANCES L JUKER
267 63
y
i
i
002 187
08/28/
MICHAEL A McGUIRE
3
T E R L..• A R L... S 0N. -...._
}/ -•fir - . a L C - ..._. _. _.
,i
-;
0028,189
08/28/92
GAIL BLACK STONE
� - # « , �-
2 » L3 9 3
z
0028190
08/28/
GRETCHEN MAGL IGH
1 1 7 92 39
c.L:
0028192
08/28/92
DAVID J JAHN
1 037, 8
� X0281 93
08/28/92
LYLE SWANSON
c!,
4
X29,;
C)(
0
ANDREA J OSTER
v
0028196
08/28/92
WILLIAM MIKISKA
185w 63
{34
j
i
5:3 ! t»r I _ __— — —
_ D A f '� I L --- F _. F A U S_T_ ---------- - - - - -- --- _ ._ _.. - -... _.
M3 3 a L
f 2 C? 1 r
00 28198
08/28/92
LINDA Z I C K
1 2 ■ .}
i�
, c
08/28/92
DEBORAH DEHN
734
'
�
AZ
00L.»820 1
08/28/92
ALAI �iA � � 1' ATHEYS
251, ..
�,
0028202
08/28/ 92
DELORES A V I G ALO
1, 229a 31
:'+5k
j; c? 6
L« 8 0
j ti..3
L.f EL E GO
1..« .L 6 r
0028E{� 4
08/28/92
BRUCE ANDERSON
1 040a 50
5C>
0( - - ) ...8.05
08/28/92
GARGLE J ANDERSON
G09 a 05
y\
752
J��C7 ,` ---- -
_ _ - t «�f 1�i..` _ _ _ --
- - - 1 j (��w.3_ - p��.ys( - - t s ( ({`
f `
S j fw
i
153i
002
08/28/92
BETTY D S ELVOG
-� • "rte'
8 +�3 ■ t . J
iCi:
0028208
08/28/92
PATRICIA FRY
847a 87
10
' 40
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0002
| EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
40
-UK lmt_-
UunxI--m/ pHv pt__Nluu
_
0028231
08/28/92
DALE K CLAUSON
0028228
08/28/92
DAVID L ARNOLD
1 802w 10
28/92
uumN J o:w/mn
1,
0028234
08/28/92
JAMES YOUNGREN
_
0028235
08/28/92
n �
0028210
08/28/92
CONNIE L KELSEY
1,054.15
/ | `z !
0028213
08/28/92
CAROL JAGOE
1,059.69
1 14,
1, 098m 55
40
|
0028216
08/28/92
MARY KAY PALANK
947a 70
0028217.
08/28/92
KENNETH V COLLINS
2,359u94
ww 1
0(_
08/28/92
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
1 421m 66
0028220
08/28/92
ELAINE FULLER
627,29
4W
00282�2
.
08/28/92
ANTHONY G CAHANES
2,034.46
^�
28
ROBERT D NELSON
2
1341
1
0028225 08/28/92 DONALD W SKALMAN
w� 0028226 08/28/92 RAYMOND J MQRELLI
-'
—
4 71
_
0028231
08/28/92
DALE K CLAUSON
0028228
08/28/92
DAVID L ARNOLD
1 802w 10
28/92
uumN J o:w/mn
1,
0028234
08/28/92
JAMES YOUNGREN
_
0028235
08/28/92
WILLIAM F PELTIER
4 71
_
0028231
08/28/92
DALE K CLAUSON
'0028232
08/28/92
RICHARD M MOESCHTER
0028234
08/28/92
JAMES YOUNGREN
--
0028235
08/28/92
WILLIAM F PELTIER
5 7 i`
1,802.10
1,546.87
1 ,546.87
----- 87 -----
1,913.00
1,802.10
or
CITY REF MAPLNEWOOD
}
000
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
0012 8236
0 ; )28237
08/28/92
THOMAS J S Z C Z EPANSK i
1, 487 u 77
. 0 028L 38
VIRGINIA DGWI'3LE
1 19
i
I
0028240
08/2
RICHARD J LAN
1
low
j'
;..,� 824
0 8/28/ 2
BALE RAZGKAZOFF
1, 546i 87
.
_ • .. t . •rrt
» k...
•• }�- �} ,fi
J
0 .
�N� I L I »I L
MICHAEL J HER
•Mt } w' •M,
2 1' , 22
0028244
08/28/92
3�
"`
, <
L
f» } 028246
08/28/92
FCC #���3LD D BECKE R
1 � 606w 03
of
0028 :47
08/
K EVIN R HALw EG
2, 0 79, 35
cy T
8 ' : � �- - - -- _ -._
_.._ .. T -- - G T GC K T C 1'vV- - - - - - - _
1 ,' 4 8. 8T
0028249
08/ 2 8 /92
PAUL_ G PAULGG --J R.
1 18
3�`
'0028L..s�.
,.�8 / L8 / �2
RICK A BOWMAN
1 a 4 98 a 34
_..__w V ! L�L _ ...- __- ._'-_.:_�- ._....._.._.._
-'_ -` 7 • ._._.___. ,' --_. ._.. ..____.._. ........ __._ _...........- --... ._ _ . ....
FLINT
... _.._... 1, 56 9 a L i .... ....... .__...._
•J +: .. .' L __.- _��.--
J 5
{.,
28252
��}£�/28
STEPHEN J HEINZ
1 589. 22
V J .
0028253
08/28/92
JOHN FRAGER
1 f 558. 4O
4 '✓1
_ - DAVI D K_ GRAS -- _. __ _ _ .__._.. _ ___ _ ._ _
I , 841.
i)
i
0028255
C - )8/28 /92
DAVID J THOMALLNA
1
(N )�. }28258
08/2 8/92
STEVEN PAL MA
1 633. 17
�r
j
0028258
08/28/92
JOSEPH A BE RGE RON
1 5 98.71
-
0028259
�,�8/28/92
FAMES MEEHA
1, 839. 60.
v 1
�-,
-- - ---
J G►# - A� fit. AE - - _ __ _ _ _ w. -- - _ __ - -
f 81
m-'�"�:
1531
J
0 028261
08/28/92
SARAH GAUNDE RG
1, 058. 14
J..;'•.
mob.
�: s �
�s q }�
M EBETSON
q •fir ,133v7O
- - - -- - - - --
GITY GE MAPLEWOOD 0004
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNI AN PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
-�
j ;
EU R THE
GU R RENT PAY PERIOD
n,
� , l : MFE-R
� _ ��CHE ��.� E �_______-
���s ___ _ _ _ ___._______.�.._.__..____ __.___ . _ -------
_ __. -- - -_ _ - - -- -- -- -._.__ AM0UN T __ _ -__ -_
J
wi
0028264
08/28/92
JANET L RABINE
1 417m, 03
:
0028265
08/28/92
JULIE A GTAHNKE
1 L75. 58
0028287
08/28/92
CAROL NELSON
1 802, 1
0028268
08/28/
JOSEPH FE HR
1 a �'' �'� �'
272 a 8 3
4
ti
V
GWENDGLY� SELL
696"
I
' 1
002827 0
0 8/ 8/ 92
SHAWN THOL.EN
453,46
1 379, 34
23
,..,
0 028273
08
KENNETH G HA I DE R
2 35 r
2'0
0028274
08/28/
JUDY M GHLEBEGK
1 ., 232. 50
L?
'
128;
l
40 '291
3Ci
0 _}2 � 6
f-
� } 8/ 2 8 /92
GER A L D #LD ME
R
'
1 ,j � 82, 68
,3,-
3L
0028277
08/28/92
MICHAEL R KANE
1
vu '•» } �» � ____
_ � f � � � - - - - -_ _____.._
RYA - NAGEL.
35
0028279 9
08/ 28/ 92
DAVID P LUTZ
1
I
,.
0028280
08/28/92
JAMES DARGT
867,
Na 28
08/28152
;41!
0028282
0 8/28/ 92
JOHN GGHMOOCK
1
1 `
i..
�.�02
08/28/92
RON J H EL E Y
1 �.... 1 �..�. �..���.�
l'
4 6 i
�" ��L.. 4. L.» i..t � -
� � 1..3 �L... ��L... ~ --- •-- - ----
-- � �� i 1_ - -- Lf •-- ti...' Y@ r"? i. i.: - -- -- -- ___._ ... __... __ .._.. _ .. _ . _ _ . _... - . _. _ - . _....
_ .. _ . _..._... _ .._ _ _ �_ - � _� � � s . � t�.�_.__ _..
i
4,
0C - )28285
08/28/92
RONALD L E REBE RG
1 245 x 3O
o
0.028286
08/28/
WILLIAM G GAGS
1 goo 50
53
0028288
08/28/92
JAMES G ELIAS
0028289
08/28/92
JOHN DU GUA RME
1 104. 50
a
4w
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
0005
0028313
08/28/92
DANA BREEDING
00 '23foj-
1- 48EN
08/28/92
0028291
08/28/92
WILLIAM PRIEBE
1,
0028292
08/28/92
BRUCE A IRISH
1 974. 90
�� !
^~ �
.
002 293
1 50SH
0028294
08/28/92
THERESA METZ
—� ----�-- —
1,329"86
-------'------
`a[���
`'
0���
' ' `
��/�/�
�� R 0�R�
1, (--)48a
`
2 _ *"-f SET
ODEGARD ------ -
- 2,124~27 — '
mw
1 210. 90
!
0028298
08/28/92
BARBARA A KRUMMEL
571.05
�Xa
08
---�-
1- 8E��� 1()
,
;24i
0028300
08/28/92
LUTHER JONES
83.20
0028301 08/28/92
0028,3303 08/28/92
MARGARET KUNDE
DENNIS P LINDORFF
��-�����
0028304 08/28/92 WILLIAM GARRY
ROLANDrBrHELEY^--------- '-------
0028306 08/28/92 MARK CARLE
08/28/92 MARK A MARUSKA
123~75
— 1,199~7Y. ---
1,230.02
1,199.71
----- 245*
460.00
1,679.40
JC
0028309 08/28/92 DAVID WIEDL
0028310 08/28/92 MATTHEW KIMLINGER
0 0 as 31
!Aql 0028312 08/28/92 LEE STOERZINGER
460, 00
----'---- ---
368, 00
--------------
525
707, 25
I*
0028313
08/28/92
DANA BREEDING
08/28/92
RICHARD E STARK
~^°^"~ 9^—
CRAI ''^^"`E
�� !
^~ �
.
460, 00
----'---- ---
368, 00
--------------
525
707, 25
I*
lk
CITY CE MAC ;lwEWOOD
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
4 0 7 1 "
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
-_ _
,- .__ -. HEM U E _._. _ � _ .__ G C , .. E _ _
_. fA E _ .__- _�._ -- _ ___.___ ___�___ . _ -._ _. __ _ .__ _. _... __.- . -__ _ . _ ,
AMOUNT----
- r - jj. ��j} _,_- .___.- _._- .__ ^__.__
. j T ye i j ( f '�
28 50
----- �- j . -} r �� . r���,f.. •. '
J
v
002 8319:
08 /28/92
SANDRA LEARNED
10
- -- C _.._...
- fir
002 8321
0 8/ 2 8/9 2
NATAL I E H I LGGEN
2 3, 7 5
0028322
08/28/92
THOMAS WEGTL I NG
30. 00
93w 75
i
`
0 CU28 3 24
0 8/28/92
ROY C WARD
w
419a 02
, .
0028325
08/ 28/'-: 4 02
DOUGLAS J TAUBMAN
1 53 a 0
____08 t28 - /9a ------------
JANET - G R E k H A Y M A N� . .._..._. _
8 8 f } s
1J'
z
0
08
JEAN NELSON
5 7,E w 1 5
24
L .
- :
0 028328:
0
j�''�j }�+�� � l� }
J UD IT H . i 7 = _ 7 • 4 L... L
+
53 �1. 4�
:JUG
0028330
08/28/92
RITA MACY
174, 00
J r
02 8331.
0 8/ 2 8/92
LYNN FISHER
2 17w 50
:
,�.
v 4 i
. 7( :M . - '„
_�.—. —.._ _r"t
_ a/ rJ f.w
� j m i � j j ' ��
i ` T�wEEN - - - J f ._.. - ��O� ' E lT�-----
j LJ V L.j
�.»}" �
r f.... .. 1..t .u►r.
3 5 :
...
0C- )28,33
08/28/92
MA BARTA
1 1 1 0 1. 0
i , `. .
yc ,
0
08/
GEOFFREY #
21 124,27
- - -:� -- - - -_ __ A.C'� -
- I ` ELL - - - -- _ _ _ _ . _ _
--
� m 8 _ -- —
o
A
0028336
08/28/92
JOYCE L LIVINGSTON
648w30
S
1
0028337
08/28/92
TROY LANCER
�
256.00
L..4�ti s25�
} Q L 1rw.
f�►f NNETf+_ s SERT - ------
4b 4T
t48i
00283�9
08/28
THOMAS G EKST RAND
1 G2 9. 83
00 28340
08/28/
M ARJORIE OST OM
# j 742. 90
/ vv
V
0028343
08/28/92
EDWARD A NADEAU
1
lk
r �-�---------'--------------------
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
| EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCION CHECKS
T
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
3,278.76
113.00
_ ........ _______
186.74
i, � REME NT oc
0028364 08/28/92 AFSCME 2725
148.50
620.84
�w 9-3988 273.00
c LUK
08/28/92
_ __
40
+
/ .
28 44
LAVERNE S
1'838- 4v�-
.
!»i
w� `
|
0028345
08/28/92
08/28/92
KEVIN HALWBG, JR
420.00
08/28/92
0028346
'
08/28/92
ROGER W BREHEIM
1, 242, 90' -
`
-
i a^
_
va' 2E q�
DAvI u � E D Sum ---'-----' -
- 1 31254
, ^
|r�
!
0028348
08/28/92
DAVID GERMAIN
--------'----
1,242.90
----'--'
00
08/28/9�
DENNIS M MULVANEY
1, 362. 90
'
',.
28/92 -------
GEORGE-C-SPREIGL----' ' - '
- 1 50 ----
'
8
ELIZABETH J WEILAND
920.08
!
08/28/92
MAPLEWOOD STATE BANK #1
22,019.20
'
------ MN - STATE -
COMM 'OF REVENUE
- 9, 372~70
40 2 11
08/28/92
FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA)
9,335.93
00283555
V H ,
08/28/92
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
4,g65.72
RUST-457---- ----
10, 03{ . 54
^'
318.75
i, � REME NT oc
0028364 08/28/92 AFSCME 2725
148.50
620.84
�w 9-3988 273.00
:7
08/28/92
MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
40
4w
0028360 V 0 I ,-,
08/28/92
UNITED WAY OF S To PAUL AREA
028361 V 0
08/28/92
COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE
VOID
08/28/92
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
�
i, � REME NT oc
0028364 08/28/92 AFSCME 2725
148.50
620.84
�w 9-3988 273.00
707.21
--~-----28.-17---'
425.95
:7
08/28/92
MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATION
40
- -28369 VOID
08/28/92
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
: 561
VOID
08/28/92
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
�
`
-
707.21
--~-----28.-17---'
425.95
CITY CE MAPLE WOOD 00 08
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
-
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
.,, w tJB � � � IAA'°
PAYE E— ��_ _.._ _ __ _- - _ __ -_-
-- -- - AMOUNT' _.
110
r8 118t -�- _
- - C - i r t T -- COLLECT
400
Me* A —
Y `
J
{ ^
a
0028372 V 0 I D
08/28/92
MED I CA CHOICE
76a76
�}
�� 0283' 0 D
08/28/9
VAC TIC CHEC .
1, 3 98, 0 1
10
VOID
• �i1
1 2 :
0(_ V 0 I
0 8/28/92
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
5 1 25 9, 2 1
j'..
1+
£ � {`' �-'8a78 V 0 I D
..
08/28/
PUBLIC E P RETIREMENT ASSOC
,�..t 5, , 4
" -!V MS
16 T
�0
� i.:- i
t ... I E r E I `E E - . A SSOC _
8, . 2
i 7'':,
�
_ _ _ _ _ .._ -... -. -
_... 32 ,� t u
s..� }'+f .i� � �f G S Ff3'+E#.f - DE D � .L C N
E
i r
y
X21$
77
I`
f
;23
24
�261
27 :
1
29
30
i
; 3 t ;
.j L i
3:3
134
'351
iJd!
i
3
!33
�7E
I
1
i
:4:y
i
;46
i
48
�2
53
54
•
AGENDA NO. F WW* 4:L
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
RF,.
0
DATE:
Mayor and City Council
Assistant City Manager
SUBURBAN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
September 1, 1992
.Action by Council:
Endorse
Modif i e d... ---=
Re j ected..__
Date
INTRODUCTION
The Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce serves Maplewood and the
surrounding communities. The Chamber works to promote economic
development and cooperation between government, schools, and businesses to
make our suburban area a better place in which to live and work.
The Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce has requested that the City Council
adopt a resolution of support for their activities. The resolution is attached for
Council review and adoption.
tmc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce has served our
area for over fifteen years; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce is the only
business and professional organization in our area studying business and
legislative issues from the single suburban perspective; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce provides a forum
for the exchange of ideas and dialogue among our city leaders, businesses,
schools and surrounding communities; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce is a positive voice
for our city and the surrounding suburban area.
NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that I, Mayor Gary Bastian, on
behalf of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, declare our support for the
Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce as an independent voice for business in
our community.
MAYOR.
F ftwo I
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review
LOCATION:
1285 Cope Avenue
OWNERS:
BB &D Investments
PROJECT:
Englewood Shops
DATE:
September 3, 1992
INTRODUCTION
Act
on by counc :l
Endors
Mods -f
R
Dat e....o.---- _ .... -- '"
The conditional use permit (CUP) at 1285 Cope Avenue is due for review. The CUP
allows a commercial building within 350 feet of a residential district.
BACKGROUND
August 8, 1988: The Council approved this CUP.
September 14, 1994 and March 25, 1991 The Council reviewed this CUP and required
a review in six months.
September 23, 1991: The Council reviewed this CUP and required a review again in
one year.
DISCUSSION
The developer is meeting the conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the conditional use permit at 1285 Cope Avenue in five years.
kd /mem \englewd
go \b- 3:englewd.mem (9)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Properly Line /Zoning Map
30 Site Plan
a
.....
Eno
�. 4 . w.• �...�� �. A M ... AR K AV �[
c 49 Oro
oat • ,. 3 g
22
0
o
rtrols Y Koh /man Loke ,� POND
Lake , Q•k / v a J N Z
KOHLMAN d AV W KOHLMA,P
Nor/h Y
H
;au Hazelwood �•
2 Pk
W Z
W -� CO RD �� H � a
0 o CO > RD
73 to N c 7b� ~� PCI
T 29N,R22W
W 23 H W K n►on W
4 1
I) ,
PALM - PAL C ac F aIG _3� .
x / 2 G 0 �� CTF�(� W ~ g gn EHILL RD t011t cr
CONNOR ON R 3 —�! Z Norvesf H MONT AV
CT ,� AV L _�_ o tt) CONNOR qy PAi r
DE MON g V °D 0
DE vs
�' ► O �� v ? ` 8 RO
0
v' gA00KCt � N Z
22 c 3 a� � a' � pv
IL Q Q SEXTANT H Four
XTAN T AV Seasons
i0 e l l
Q' 1 Pk
1 12 GERVAIS AV a GERVAIS GERVAIS G
'
PKWY �. GRANDVIEW AV W CT
H �L m VIKING DR Y
R R N
P E C T 'f COP P E A Knuckle Heod Lake psi
= F V .�- COPE C
Keller Lake W .
1 Z L R K AV W L y
N Vf
CO o. N 9 LAURIE Z g R W - � a
O Q Y W
5
I.ELANO RD SAND- HURST cc wood Pk? AV
BURKE CT 25 �- Z W W a
a JUNCTION ST 1� o Y CO > RD
1V Mgoik� o �� BU RKE AV
W Pk P �I� R AE AV � � o Rbb�
4V a �� (i) CHAMBERS Sr N m ELDRIDG AV S
' Q
1 a � 60� �'" SKI �.M A AV W 6E L AV < \� GY�r�
R� J AV K ICEMAN AV = RE CRE"Ar101v'
�" ARRIg '"'►.
p
W W 00 � P�RS o � Oy � ...�•�
� E AV N ROSEWOOD
E
►. /
1 Ft� AN RY- N AJ , S A V . J S
........ P
26 TRA IL .-- -- P
A pt > N
FROST a• 0 00
AV 28
N cr
o � G
1 27 N W FE TON AV
N N 1 m W ' Q
y J J`ar S ME R AV W SUM MER ►- 1
W Q Q N a N Y
y �; ; °¢ FRISSIE AV = PK o a 121 >_ o a
62 a o Z ,a W o �•c
W a RIPLEY - a a a
N AV 2 Q } Z m RIPLEY 9
Cr 2 O
����. f--- -- W cv W S� � NiF /ELD Y J KI
Round IA av _ Z o y�1.� // W
\ ke s Y a - W HIA AV o LAKE ac - a ir
9 a Z �` a PRICE `� GU �� f 3 a =
O W J �� Si
LA R TfUR Ay �m 29
LOCATION MAP
2 Attachment 1
1 %0 fowl
24 J
L7 '
j
o �
A
.a.o9 � . .
2o. •
05 � �.9400�• �J �•
03� tC
• !9 •
r •
�► 5p • •
des s �• a•�
ev
4 fit.
' � B. % •� � � •
� N in
MIT
• 9 hwa 36 ——
18 0
j d'� �• a
U= .. • I
•r 1 1.��1 3•tLat.
s Maplewood Racquetball g Club 30 .••
494C. i 4j 0
fib
� r' tv � 7 � '•a `1. SAO ' � •
� � �� rte+ � ' � • . � . . .
W
?,� t , ~
• • ., • ! •• I �' � .fi {•' •• •,��i � � j ' ' �
14 . j V1
VA4 it o UJ
' ...
Haglund Dental Office
x.30' .. • 1 +' VC ApI
r•A ..... . •
a - nun■
A
601 t t i �
7 4 • 4 9 so
S ,, C� C
Y
1 � I 1244 � - a
1 ,r 1252 1260 1268 1276 1282 1294 1308
A
+, d .► S w i i x ! 151 1 lb t Il 1 o 10 0 ! 0 7 V ? �• �'! 2 0 +; .+► �64)
Nina A,
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
Q
N
3 Attachment 2
ti
x
t
a
FUEL SALES
C OA
.L7:
11
�
r W I
C)
F
y
J
'i 2
J W
1pfA
SITE PLAN
a
Attachment 3
w000ll
4
N
HIGHWAY 36
AGENDA ITEM F--",j5
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Counciltl
TO: City Manager
Endorse
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Mod3.fiea
Rejected. -
SUBJECT: Footprint Lake Storm Sewer, Project 87- 32— Accept Project Date
DATE: September 4, 1992
Introduction
This project is complete. A recapitulating change order is attached. This change order in
the amount of $24,123.09 reflects the overall changes in actual quantities built in
comparison to the estimated quantities on which the contract was let.
6ackaround
The contractor has agreed t a $40,000.00 liquidated damages settlement for late
completion. The total final payments to contractor is $1,910,995.90.. Other project costs
have totaled $721,271.28. Therefore, the total project cost is $2,650,000.00 (rounded).
Budget Impact
The approved funding for this project is currently $2,840,440.00. This exceeds the actual
project cost by $190,440.00. The general obligation funding of the project can be reduced
from $975,440.00 to $785,000.00.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the project be accepted as given in the attached resolution.
i
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT
WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City of Maplewood has deter nined that. Footprint
Lake Storm Sewer, City Project 87 -32, is complete and recommends acceptance of the
project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA, that City Project 87 -32 is complete and maintenance of these improvements
is accepted by the city. Release of any retainage in the amount of $92,245.87 less
$40,000.00 as agreed liquidated damages for late completion is hereby authorized.
ENGINEERS N ARCHITECTS ! PLANNERS
September 2, 1992
Bruce Irish
City of Maplewood
1830 E. Co. Rd. B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Bruce:
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 -5108 612 490 -2000 800 325 -2055
RE: MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
FOOTPRINT LAKE
STORM SEWER
CITY PROJECT NO. 87 -32
SEH FILE NO: 88053.02
Enclosed are the lien waiver letters, certificates of compliance
p ce
from Commissioner of Taxation verification of material
specification and compensating change order for the above -
referenced project. We recommend making the final a en
p Ym t of
$198,324.44 less
$40,000 in 1 liquidated the final
payment by the City should be $158,324.444
PCI is planning on approval of the payment application pp at the
September 14 Council
meeting. If there are any problems that may
hold this payment up, please let me know. If ou h
questions, Y have any
q , please call me at 490- 2026.
RJK /cmb
Enclosure
c: Ken Meister, SEH
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. ST. CLOUD, MN
Si ely ;
Rocky J. ee P.E.
Water Resources Engineer
CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
MADISON, WI
SiRp 0 2 1022
m7f
CHANGE ORDER
IN /.AMMERS 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 -5108 612 490 -2000 800 325 -2055
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
OWNER
CITY PROJECT NCB. 87 -32
OKWERS PRCXIECT NO.
FOOTPRINT LAKE OUTLET
PROJECT DESCRIPTIOI N
AUGUST 31, 1992
DATE - -
03
CHaIVGE ORDER NO
88053
SEH FILE NO.
The following changes shall be made to the contract documents
Description: 1. Add 1" copper service pipe and 1 curb stops ($1,,835.00)
2. Compensating change order is for final payment.
This change order will increase the final contract sum by $24,123.09. A detailed breakdown is
attached.
Purpose of Change Order:
1. During construction of storm sewer along County Road B east of Germain Street, water services
were in conflict with the pipe and had to be moved.
2. The purpose of this compensating change order is to adjust the original contract price to a final
as- constructed price based on actual quantities of work installed.
Basis of Cost: X Actual F] Estimated
Attachments (list supporting documents)
Contract status
Original Contract
Net Change Prior C. O. 's 1 to 2
Time
Cost
$1,
+ 7,959,67
Change This C.O. +24,123.09
Revised Contract $1 ,953 1 ,078.03
�z Recommended for Approval: SHORT- ELLIOTT- HENDRICKSON, INC. 6y
Cocky I Ke .Eo
Agreed to by Ontractor: Prog ive Contractors, Inc. Approved for Owner. City of Maplewood, MN
BY
BY
TfTLE
NTWDOT, State -Aid Engineer
Disv budon Contractor 2 Owner 1 Project Representative 1 SEH Office 1
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. ST. CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
MADISON, Wl
COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER - CHANGE ORDER NO.3
MAPLEWOOD, MN - CITY PROJECT NO. 87-32,
SEH FILE NO. 88053
CONTRACTOR - PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC.
DATE: 8/31/92
NO. ITEM
UNIT
RIGINAL
QTY.
FINAL
QTY.
UNIT
PRICE
ORIGINAL
PRICE
FINAL
PRICE
CHANGE
....................... is I. ::::::: KZEWE :&MIS ILA . ..
........
.............
... .......
....... .... .......
...............................
............
.......... ...............
A- SIE ------
- EA
'-DM--.- -'R
0- OMBINED'
........ .. ...
........ :............:....•..:...:..........:::.:..::......:..:.::.:::..:.:...:: ..:........:...:...:::::..:...;
............
. ;: :.:; :::::;::;::•::.:;:::;::.::::::;:.::.::::::.:.::::.:::::.:::::::::.:.::.:::.:;::;::.:::.::::::::.:.:.::.:::::::::;:::;:::::::::•::::::.::.:.::.:.::.:.::.::::::::;::.::::•:.:.
.......
.............
..........
........
......................
........
...................... .......
.....................
............. .....................
........................
.......
..............
.. ....... .... ........
............... *.'.%*.*.l.l ..........
. ........
202...5
1. 01 OBILIZATION
L.S.
1
1
46000.00
46000.00
:::.:..:.:::::::::.:.:::::::::;
46000.00
::::•::.:.::...........::::::::::;:.
............
............................:
....... ............ :.: :::...... : :;:
0.00
2101.501 LEARING
ACRE
0.68
0.3
1600.00
1088.00
480.00
- 608.00
- 608.00
2101.502 LEARING
TREE
246
382
30.00
7380.00
11460.00
4080.00
4080.00
2101.506 RUBBING
ACRE
0.68
0.3
1600.00
1088.00
480.00
- 608.00
- 608.00
2101.507 GRUBBING
TREE
246
275
30.00
7380.00
8250.00
870.00
870.00
2104.501 REMOVE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
L.F.
381
1004
7.00
2667.00
7028.00
4361.00
4361.00
21040501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
L.F.
830
671
1.00
830.00
671.00
- 159.00
- 159.00
2104.501 REMOVE CM CULVERT PIPE
L.F.
863
930
4.00
3452.00
3720.00
268.00
268.00
2104..501 REMOVE BITUMINOUS CURB
L.F.
15
2.00
30.00
0.00
-30.00
-30.00
2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S.Y.
77
49.15
2.00
154.00
98.30
-55.70
-55.70
2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE
EACH
3
7
120.00
360.00
840.00
480.00
480.00
2104.509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN
EACH
8
8
90.00
720.00
720.00
0.00
2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
S.Y.
23597
25319
2.00
47194.00
50638.00
3444.00
3444.00
2104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
S.Y.
.2467
2477.3
2.75
6784.25
6812.58
28.33
28.33
2104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
S.Y.
289
409.7
6.00
1734.00
2458.20
724.20
724.20
2104.507 REMOVE MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS
C.Y.
40
80
20.00
800.00
1600.00
800.00
-
800.00
2104.509 REMOVE FLAP GATE
EACH
1
2
150.00
150.00
300.00
150.00
150.00
2104.511 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT
L.F.
246
178.5
4.00
984.00
714.00
- 270.00
- 270.00
2104.509 REMOVE ENERGY DISSIPATOR
EACH
1
1
250.00
250.00
250.00
0.00
2104.513 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
L.F.
4961
3094
1.80
8929.80
5569.20
- 3360.60
-- 3360.60
2104.521 SALVAGE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
L.F.
362
142
8.00
2896.00
1136.00
- 1760.00
- 1760.00
2104.521 SALVAGE WIRE FENCE
L.F.
698
80
0.75
523.50
60.00
- 463.50
- 463.50
2104.521 SALVAGE CHAIN LINK FENCE
L.F.
1718
439
1.50
2577.00
658.50
- 1918.50
- 1918.50
2104.521 ALVAGE WOODEN FENCE
L.F.
102
43
1.50
153.00
64.50
-88.50
-88.50
2104.523 ALVAGE RC PIPE APRON
EACH
3
150.00:
450.00
0000
- 450.00
- 450.00
2104.523 ALVAGE CASTING
EACH
11
25
60.00
660.00
1500.00
840.00
840.00
2104.523 ALVAGE AND INSTALL WOOD SHED
EACH
1
1
1000.00
1000.00
1000.00
0.00
2104.525 BANDON MANHOLE
EACH
1
1
500.00
500.00
500.00
0.00
2105.501 OMMON EXCAVATION (P)
C.Y.
32890
45873
2.90
95381.00
133031.70
37650.70
37650.70
2105.511 OMMON CHANNEL EXCAVATION (P)
C.Y.
1700
1700
3.50
5950.00
5950.00
0.00
2105.526 ELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
C.Y.
4550
1660
6.00
27300.00
9960.00
- 17340.00
- 17340.00
2105.535 ALVAGED TOPSOIL (LV)
C.Y.
15180
7841
3.70
56166.00
29011.70
- 27154.30
- 27154.30
2105.541 TABILIZING AGGREGATE
C.Y.
115
398
10.00
1150.00
3980.00
2830.00
2830.00
2130.501 ATER FOR DUST CONTROL
(M) GAL
105
8
15.00
1575.00
120.00
- 1455.00
- 1455.00
2211.501 GGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5
TON
15046.5
11194.7
7.75
116610.38
86758.93
- 29851.45
- 29851.45
2232.501 ILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE .(1 -1 12 11 )
S.Y.
236
162
3.00
708.00
486.00
-- 222.00
- 222.00
2301.501 " CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
S.Y.
301
622.24
21.00
6321.00
13067.04
6746.04
6746.04
2331.504 QITUMINOUS.MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE
TON
162.7
173.07
130.00
21151.00
22499.10
1348.10
1348.10
2331.514 BASE COURSE MIXTURE
TON
3253
3605.63
12.45
40499.85
44890.09
4390.24
4390.24
2341.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE
TON
184.2
149.33
130.00
23946.00
19412.90
-- 4533.10
- 4533.10
2341.508 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
3070
3540.27
14.65
44975.50
51864.96
6889.46
6889.46
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GAL.
1245
1.385
1.05
1307.25
1454.25
147.00
147.00
TEMPORARY SHEETING
S.F.
300
8.50
0.00
2550.00
2550.00
2550.00
PAGE 1
COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO.
MAPLEWOOD, MN - CITY PROJECT NO. 87-32
SEH FILE NO. 88053
CONTRACTOR - PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC.
DATE: 8/31/92
NO. ITEM
UNIT
RIGINAL
QTY.
FINAL
QTY.
UN IT
PRICE
ORIGINAL
PRICE
FINAL
PRICE
CHANGE
2451.513 FIN I AGGR G
F2501.511
440
0
9.00
3960.00
0.00
- 3960.00
- 3960.00
2451.511 COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE (LV)
C.Y.
1070
0
16.00
17120.00
0.00
- 17120.00
- 17120.00
15" CS PIPE CULVERT, 14 GAUGE
LF.
155
268
14.00
2170.00
3752000
1582.00
1582.00
2501.511 .12" RC PIPE CULVERT, CL V
LF.
86
50.4
18.00
1548.00
907.20
- 640.80
- 640.80
2501.511 .15" RC PIPE CULVERT, CL V
LF.
28
10.7
20.00
560.00
214.00
- 346.00
- 346.00
2501.51.5 15" CS PIPE APRON
EACH
6
12
70.00
420.00
840.00
420.00
420.00
2501.515 18" CS PIPE APRON FOR CP PIPE
EACH
1
3
95.00
95.00
285.00
190.00
190.00
2501.515 24N CS PIPE APRON FOR CP PIPE
EACH
1
1
120.00
120.00
120.00
0.00
2501.515 12" RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH GUARD
EACH
2
7
465.00
930.00
3255.00
2325.00
2325.00
2501.515 15" RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH GUARD
EACH
15
13
515.00
7725.00
6695.00
- 1030.00
- 1030.00
2501.515 18" RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH GUARD
EACH
2
2
555.00
1110.00
1110.00
0.00
2501.515 4" RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH GUARD
EACH
4
6
850.00
3400.00
5100.00
1700.00
1700.00
2501.515 3ON RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH GUARD
EACH
2
3
1135.00
2270.00
3405.00
1135.00
1135.00
2501.515 6" RC PIPE APRON/W TRASH GUARD
EACH
2
2
1405.00
2810.00
2810.00
0.00
25010521 22N SPAN RC PIPE CULVERT, CL III
LF.
24
16
35.00
840.00
560.00
- 280.00
- 280.00
2501.525 2" SPAN RC PIPE -ARCH APRON/W TG
EACH
4
4
495.00
1980.00
1980.00
0.00
2503.525. 3 -3/4" SPAN RC PIPE -ARCH APRON/W TG
EACH
2
2
1300.00
2600.00
2600.00
000
2503.511 12" CP PIPE SEWER
LF.
215
215
13.25
2848.75
2848.75
-
0.00
2503.511 18" CP PIPE SEWER
L.F.
161
163
19.10
3075.10
3113.30
38.20
38.20
2503.511 4" CP PIPE SEWER
LF.
250
223
25.60
6400.00
5708.80
- 691.20
- 691.20
2503.521 3 -3/4" SPAN RC PIPE -ARCH SEWER, CL II
LF.
834
102
52.00
43368.00
5304.00
- 38064.00
- 38064.00
2503.521 51-1/8N SPAN RC PIPE -ARCH SEWER, CL V
LF.
37
42
305.00
11285.00
12810.00
1525.00
1525.00
2503.521 73N SPAN RC PIPE -ARCH SEWER, CL V
LF.
588
584
158.80
93374.40
92739.20
- 635.20
- 635.20
2503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL V
25030541 15" RC PIPE
LF.
1290
980
16.00
20640.00
15680.00
- 4960.00
- 4960.00
SEWER, DES. 3006, CL ill
2503.541 15" RC PIPE SEWER, DES.
LF.
483
436
18.00
8694.00
7848.00
- 846.00
- 846.00
3006, CL V
LF.
1674
1828
19.50
32643.00
35646.00
3003.00
3003.00
2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006,. CL II
L.F.
59
18
20.00
1180.00
360.00
- 820.00
- 820.00
2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL III
LF.
216
294
20.00
4320.00
5880.00
1560.00
1560.00
2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL. V
LF.
253
464
21.00
5313.00
9744.00
4431.00
4431.00
2503.541 1 " RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL II
LF.
66
65
21.60
1425.60
1404.00
-21.60
-21.60
2503.541 1" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL III
L.F.
325
364
22.00
7150.00
8008.00
858.00
858.00
2503.541 4" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL it
LF.
208
182
23.20
4825.60
4222.40
- 603.20
- 603.20
2503.541 4" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL III
LF.
815
877
24.20
19723.00
21223.40
1500.40
1500.40
2503.541 4" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL IV
LF.
764
1086
26.00
19864.00
28236.00
8372.00
8372.00
2503.541 4" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL V
LF.
586
701
31.70
18576.20
22221.70
3645.50
3645.50
.2503.541 " RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL it
LF.
14
165.5
29.00
406.00
4799.50
4393.50
4393.50
2503.541 0" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL III
LF.
391
770.5
29.80
11651.80
22960.90
11309.10
11309.10
2503.541 ON RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL IV
LF.
98
24
37.10
3635.80
890.40
- 2745.40
- 2745.40
2503.541 " RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL II
LF.
982
823.14
36.50
35843.00
30044.61
- 5798.39
- 5798.39
2503.541 " RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL III
LF.
1300
1382
40.00
52000.00
55280.00
3280.00
3280.00
2503.541 " RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL IV
L.F.
868
981
48.70
42271.60
47774.70
5503.10
5503.10
2503.541 " RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL V
LF.
140
0
62.55
8757.00
0.00
- 8757.00
- 8757.00
2503.541 2" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL V
L.F.
922
1133
82.80
76341.60
93812.40
17470.80
17470.80
2503.541 8" RC PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL IV
2503.541 48m RCP PIPE SEWER, DES. 3006, CL V
LF.
L.F.
153
135
83.00
12699.00
11205.00
- 1494.00
- 1494.00
642
659.5
108.00
69336.00
71226.00
1890.00
1890.00
PAGE 2
COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NO.3
MAPLEWOOD, MN - CITY PROJECTNO, 87 -32
SEH FILE NO. 88053
CONTRACTOR - PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC.
DATE: 8/31/92
NO. ITEM
UNIT
R GINAL
QTY.
FINAL
QTY.
NIT
PRICE
ORIGINAL
PRICE
FINAL
PRICE
N E7
CHANGE
2503.541 » JACKED RC PIPE S
160
160
620.00
99200.00
99200.00
0.00
2503.571 INSTALL RC PIPE SEWER
LF.
344
142
12.00
4128.00
1704.00
- 2424.00
- 2424.00
2506.506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN A
LF.
65.3
79.83
100.00
6530.00
7983.00
1453.00
1453.00
2506.506 ONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN B
LF.
66.59
112.15
130.00
8656.70
14579.50
5922.80
5922.80
2506.506 EONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN C
LF.
156.84
133.06
170.00
26662.80
22620.20
- 4042.60
- 4042.60
2506.506 ONSTRUCTMANHOLE, DESIGN D
LF.
235.22
238.3
205.00
48220.10
48851.50
631.40
631.40
2506.506 ONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN E
LF.
25.39
24.18
140.00
3554.60
3385.20
- 169.40
- 169.40
2506.506 ONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN F
LF.
9.63
9.87
430.00
4140.90
4244.10
103.20
103.20
2506.506 ONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN C -2
LF.
21.96
38.44
210.00
4611.60
8072.40
3460.80
3460.80
2506.506 ONSTRUCT MANHOLE, DESIGN D -2
LF.
13.64
4.8
275.00
3751.00
1320.00
- 2431.00
- 2431.00
2506.507 ONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN A -1
LF.
71.2
73.64
150.00
10680.00
11046.00
366.00
366.00
2506.507 ONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN B -1
LF.
13.1
13.26
150.00
1965.00
1989.00
24.00
24.00
2506.507 ONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN C -1
LF.
22.97
20.74
200.00
4594.00
4148.00
- 446.00
- 446.00
2506.507 ONSTRUCTCATCH BASIN, DESIGN D -1
LF.
20.97
8.72
225.001
4718.25
1962.00
- 2756.25
- 2756.25
2506.507 ONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, DESIGN E -1
LF.
29.48
33.98
125.00
3685.00
4247.50
562.50
562.50
2506.516 ASTING ASSEMBLY TYPE R- 3067 -V
EACH
25
29
210.00
5250.00
6090.00
840.00
840.00
2506.516 ASTING ASEMBLY TYPE R -4342
EACH
21
28
115.00
2415.00
3220.00
805.00
805.00
2506.516 ASTING ASEMBLY TYPE R -1412A
EACH
51
60
140.00
7140.00
8400.00
1260.00
1260.00
2506.516 ASTING ASEMBLY TYPE R -1741 D
EACH
9
3
715.00
6435.00
2145.00
- 4290.00
- 4290.00
2506.516 CASTING ASEMBLY TYPE R -2565C
EACH
6
7
260.00
1560.00
1820.00
260.00
260.00
0506.602 FURN. & INSTALL SPECIAL STRUCT. NO. 1
EACH
1
1
18700.00
18700.00
18700.00
0.00
0506.602 FURN. & INSTALL SPECIAL STRUCT. NO.2
EACH
1
1
5275.00
5275.00
5275.00
0.00
0506.602 FURN. & INSTALL SPECIAL STRUCT. NO.3
EACH
1
1
8000.00
8000.00
8000.00
0.00
0506.602 BULKHEAD
EACH
21
40
100.00
2100.00
4000.00
1900.00
1900.00
25110501 RANDOM RIPRAP, CL II
C.Y.
105
173.25
30.00
3150.00
5197.50
2047.50
2047.50.
2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP, CL III
C.Y.
64.1
65.6
35.00
.2243.50
2296.00
52.50
52.50
2511.515 GEOTEXTILE FILTER, TYPE IV
S.Y.
591.1
519.7
3.00
1773.30
1559.10
- 214.20
- 214.20
2521.501 4 0 CONCRETE WALK
S.F.
601
255
2.50
1502.50
637.50
- 865.00
- 865.00
2531.501 ONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DES. B -618
LF.
734
504
8.00
5872.00
4032.00
- 1840.00
- 1840.00
2531.501 0 NCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DES. B -612
LF.
35
225
15.00
525.00
3375.00
2850.00
2850.00
2531.501 ONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DES. B -624
LF.
395
718
9.00
3555.00
6462.00
2907.00
2907.00
2531.501 ONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, DES. D -412
LF.
24
22
15.00
360.00
330.00
-30.00
-30.00
2531.501 PRECAST CONCRETE CURB
LF.
410
410
8.00
3280.00
3280.00
0.00
2554.521 ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY
EACH
2
0.67
300.00
600.00
201.00
- 399.00
- 399.00
2557.517 EHICULAR GATE
EACH
1
4
575.00
575.00
2300.00
1725.00
1725.00
2557.529 TEMPORARY GATE
L.F.
220
0
3.50
770.00
0.00
- 770.00
- 770.00
0557.601 INSTALL SALVAGED CHAIN LINK FENCE
LF.
1718
185
1.50
2577.00
277.50
- 2299.50
- 2299.50
0557.601 INSTALL SALVAGED WIRE FENCE
LF.
50
0
0.75
37.50
0.00
-37.50
-37.50
0557.601 INSTALL SALVAGED WOODEN FENCE
LF.
102
104
1.50
153.00
156.00
3.00
3.00
0577.602 FURNISH AND INSTALL
' CHAIN LIN K FENCE
LF.
533
2558
9.31
4962.23
23814.98
18852.75
18852.75
0577.603 FURNISH 4' CHAINLINK FENCE
LF.
260
310
6.40
1664000
1984.00
320.00
320.00
2571.501 FURNISH AND PLANT EVERGREEN TREE
COLORADO SPRUCE, 6' H EIGHT, B &B
EACH
2
29
175.00
350.00
5075.00
4725.00
4725.00
2571.502 FURNISH AND PLANT SHADE TREE
PAGE 3
COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER - CHANGE ORDER NO.3
MAPLEWOOD, MN - CITY PROJECT NO. 87-32
SEH FILE NO. 88053
CONTRACTOR - PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC.
DATE: 8/31/92
NO. ITEM
UNIT
RIGINAL
QTY.
FINAL
QTY.
UNIT
PRICE
ORIGINAL
PRICE
FINAL
PRICE
NET
CHANGE
RSHA L S ASH, 3" CAL, B&B
EACH
2
9
250.00
500.00
2250.00
1750000
1750.00
2571.502 FU RN ISH AND PLANT SHADE TREE
REENSPIRE LINDEN, 3" CAL B &B
EACH
2
5
200000
400.00
1000.00
600.00
600.00
2571.502 FU RN ISH AND PLANT SHADE TREE
RIVER BIRCH, 10' CLUMP, B&B
EACH
2
3
200.00
400.00
600.00
200.00
200.00
2571.502 FURNISH AND PLANT SHADE TREE
ORTHWOOD MAPLE, 2-1/2' CAL, B &B
EACH
2
21
200.00
400.00.
4200.00
3800.00
3800.00
2571.503 FURNISH AND PLANT FLOWERING TREE
ROYALTY CRAB, 2" CAL B &B
EACH
2
4
200.00
400000
800.00
400.00
400.00
2571.503 FURNISH AND PLANT FLOWERING TREE
J APANESE TREE LILAC, 10' CLUMP, B &B
EACH
2
0
200.00
400.00
0.00
- 400.00
- 400.00
2571.541 TRANSPLANTTREE, EVERGREEN, 2 -4' HEIGHT
TREE
10
4
50.00
500.00
200.00
- 300.00
- 300.00
2571.541 TRANSPLANT TREE, EVERGREEN, 4 -8'. HEIGHT
TREE
4
15
75.00
300.00
1125.00
825.00
825.00
2571.541 TRANSPLANT DECIDUOUS, 1 " TO 2-1/2 DIA.
TREE
4
12
50.00
200.00
600.00
400.00
400.00
2571.541 TRANSPLANT DECIDUOUS, 3" TO 5" DIA.
TREE
2
4
75.00
150.00
300.00
150.00
150.00
2571.544 TRANSPLANT SHRUB, EVERGREEN
SHRUB
6
5
50.00
300.00
250.00
-50.00
-50.00
2571.544 TRANSPLANT SHRUB, DECIDUOUS
SHRUB
6
3
50.00
300.00
150.00
- 150.00
- 150.00
2573.501 BALE CHECK
EACH
32
151
6.00
192.00
906.00
714.00
-
714.00
2573.503 SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED
LF.
132
200
3.50
462.00
700.00
238.00
238.00
2575.501 ROADSIDE SEEDING
ACRE
13.44
13.6
125.00
1680.00
1700.00
20.00
20.00
2575.502 MIXTURE 6
LB.
957.74
952
2.45
2346.46
2332.40
-14.06
-14.06
2575.505 DING TYPE A
S.Y.
44137
50771
1.30
57378.10
66002.30
8624.20
8624.20
2575.511 H MATERIAL, TYPE 1
LD
TON
39.07
40.8
125.00
4883.75
5100.00
216.25
216.25
2575.519
ACRE
13.44
13.6
40.00
537.60.
544.00
6.40
6.40
2575:531 MERCIAL FERTILIZER ANALYSIS 10 -10 -10
TON
3.28
3.35
250.00
820.00
837.50
17.50
17.50
2575.523 D FIBER BLANKET
S.Y.
347
600
1.00
347.00
600.00
253.00
253.00
2575.555 TURF ESTABLISHMENT
L.S.
1
1
25000.00
25000.00
25000.00
0.00
0500.000 LANDSCAPE ROCK
L.S.
1
1
2000.00
2000.00
2000.00
0.00
0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL
I: ....... ................
. .......... ......
LS.
.......
1
1
19000.00
19000.00
19000.00
...............
............... 0.00
.............. .........
. .:. .................
S10 t. : ::A $ �.
I! VI :
.. RY ERA
............................................................. ...............................
..
...............
............
.....
.....................
...........
...... ..........
....... ..........
................ ...........
.............
.................................
. .....................
.............
..............
................ .
........................
:
. .......
.......
...............................
............................
N
02 56.60 1 P VC SE RVIC E PIPE
.............
L.F.
2546 '* *
..
..... *''** ...... 3081
...
9.50
24187.00
29269.50
5082.50
5082.50
0256.601 " PVC, SEWER PIPE 8' -10' DEEP
LF.
247
496
9.30
2297.10
4612.80
2315.70
2315.70
0256.601 8 PVC, SEWER PIPE 10' -12' DEEP
LF.
403
316
10.00
4030.00
3160.00
- 870.00
- 870.00
0256.601 " PVC, SEWER PIPE 12' -14' DEEP
LF.
1105
1278
11.00
12 155.00
14058.00
1903.00
1903.00
0256.601 " PVC, SEWER PIPE 14' --16' DEEP
LF.
775
806
12.50
9687.50
10075.00
387.50
387.50
0256.601 " PVC, SEWER PIPE 16' - 18' DEEP
LF.
85
19
15.00
1275.00
285.00
- 990.00
- 990.00
0256.601 " PVC, SEWER PIPE 18' -20' DEEP
LF.
25
0
19.00
475.00
0.00
- 475.00
- 475.00
0256.601 12" PVC, SEWER PIPE 0' -8' DEEP
LF.
431
427
12.50
5387.50
5337.50
-50.00
-50.00
0256.601 12" PVC, SEWER PIPE 8' -10' DEEP
LF.
77
83
13.00
1001.00
1079.00
78.00
78.00
0256.601 12H PVC, SEWER. PIPE 10' -12' DEEP
LF.
156
158
14.50
2262.00
2291.00
29.00
29.00
.0256.601 15" PVC, SEWER PIPE 16' -18' DEEP
LF.
333
0
22.00
7326.00
0.00
- 7326.00
- 7326.00
0256.601 " DIP SERVICE PIPE
LF.
66
105
15.00
990.00
1575.00
585.00
585.00
0256.601 " DIP, SEWER PIPE
LF.
498
495
20.00
9960.00
9900.00
-60.00
-60.00
PAGE 4
COMPENSATING CHANGE ORDER - CHANGE ORDER NO.3
MAPLEWOOD, MN CITY PROJECT NO. 87-32
SEH FILE NO. 88053
CONTRACTOR - PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC.
DATE: 8/31/92
NO. ITEM
UNIT
RIGINAL
QTY.
FINAL
QTY.
UNIT
PRICE
ORIGINAL
PRICE
FINAL
PRICE
NET
CHANGE
0256.601 18 DIP, SEWER PIPE
LF.
20
20
82.00
1640.00
1640.00
0.00
0256.601 EXCESS DEPTH STANDARD MANHOLE
LF.
64.5
61.59
75.00
4837.50
4619.25
- 218.25
- 218.25
0256.601 OUTSIDE DROP FOR MANHOLE
LF.
13.5
14.8
150.00
2025.00
2220.00
195.00
195.00
0256.604 INSULATION
BD.FT.
24536
24280
1.00
24536.00
24280.00
- 256.00
- 256.00
0256.602 STANDARD MANHOLE, V -8' DEEP
EACH
16
17
1100.00
17600.00
18700.00
1100.00
1100.00
0256.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE
EACH
68
73
150.00
10200.00
10950.00
750.00
750.00
0256.602 CUT IN 8" X 6" PVC WYE
EACH
7
13
250.00
1750.00
3250.00
1500.00
1500.00
0256.602 " X 6" PVC WYE
EACH
39
41
65.00
2535.00
2665.00
130.00
130.00
0256.602 .15' X 6" PVC WYE
EACH
3
2
150.00
450.00
300.00
- 150.00
- .150.00
0256.601 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE
LF.
1
9
150.00
150.00
1350.00
1200.00
1200.00
0259.603 CRUSHED ROCK PIPE SUBGRADE BACKFILL
TON
50
220.4
10.00
500.00
2204.00
1704900
1704.00
0259.603 AGGREGATE PIPE SUBGRADE BACKFILL
TON
50
848
10.00
500.00
8480.00
7980.00
7980.00
0256.601 SERVICE INSPECTION TRENCH
LF.
370
306
10.00
3700.00
3060.00
- 640.00
- 640.00
0256.605 BY -PASS PUMPING
L.S.
1
1
8000.00
8000.00
8000.00
0.00
0256.606 SALVAGE & REPLACE SANITARY MH CASTING
................ .. ..........
......
EACH
. ...............
8
................
8
150.00
1200.00
1200.00
... ..............................................
0.00
............ .. . .............. ...................
': E�
.......... ..... Q : :.:: ..........
C`t:: .
ill .. .................
f� i :.:
AT N:
..•. •: .•........•.,.,.•.•.........,., �� ................ ...
,N . .......................
.....
I ...
.....................
.......
....................
..............
...
I .................... ....
............................
............................
............
.........
................................
.....
.......
.......... ...........
........ ...........
........
.......................
..........
��
..................
025 N.� CL 53 �
7.60 1 DIP�� Ai��
WATERMAIN
RM
• 2�
1 15
1132
14.00
17010.00
..
15848.00
..........................
................... .....
- 1162.00
.......
..........................
- • 1 . 1 . 62.00 .
0257.601 " DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52
LF.
588
406
15.10
8878.80
6130.60
- 2748.20
- 2748.20
0257.602 " M.J. R.S. GATE VALVE & BOX
EACH
10
13
385.00
3850.00
5005.00
1155.00
1155.00
0257.602 N . M.J. R.S. GATE VALVE & BOX
EACH
4
6
505.00
2020.00
3030.00
1010.00
1010.00
0257.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX
EACH
4
9
100.00
400.00
900.00
500.00
500.00
0257.603 M.J. FITTINGS 12"& SMALLER
LBS.
3111
3196
1.00
3111.00
3196.00
85.00
85.00
0257.602 RELOCATE HYDRANT
EACH
3
4
700.00
2100.00
2800.00
700.00
700.00
0257.602 OFFSET 1 " COPPER SERVICE
EACH
8
10
150.00
1200.00
1500.00
300.00
300.00
0257.602 TRENCHING FOR 6" ON 6" WET TAP
EACH
3
2
300.00
900.00
600.00
- 300.00
- 300.00
0257.604 INSULATION
B D. FT.
9370
10731
1.00
9370.00
10731.00
1361.00
1361.00
0257.602 FFSET 6" DIP WATERMAIN
EACH
2
2
800.00
1600.00
1600.00
0.00
0257.602 FFSET 8" DIP WATERMAIN
EACH
3
2
850.00
2550.00
1700.00
- 850.00
- 850.00
0257.602 FFSET 16" DIP WATERMAIN
EACH
1
0
2400.00
2400.00
0.00
- 2400.00
- 2400.00
0257 .601 RENCHING FOR WATER SERVICE
L.F.
381
100
8.00
3048.00
800.00
- 2248.00
- 2248.00
1" COPPER SERVICE PIPE
LF.
0
67
15.00
0.00
1005.00
1005.00
1005.00
1 " CURB STOP AND BOX
EACH
0
11
75.00
0.00
825.00
825.00
825.00
T�3T : .
} ............
--.* .......
............
Xxx X*
.......... .
........
.. . .......
:::.
9� 9.. ..
9 �7
.
:1:93:..
0
.7$x03
.... ..... ..........
.::::: 25
............... .......
.....
PAGE 5
nPPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
NO.
13 FINAL
OWNER: CITE' OF MAPLEWOOD
PROJECT
NO. 87-32
LOCATION: FOOTPRINT LASE
OUTLET
SEH NO. 88053
MAPLEWOOD, MN,
CONTRACTOR: PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS
INC.
8736 ZACHARY LN,
CONTRACT
DATE: 6 ` 4 - 901
OSSEO, MN. 55369
CONTRACT
AMOUNT:
$1,920
APPLICATION DATE: 8-3-92
APPLICATION AMOUNT:
$198,324.44
PERIOD ENDING: 8-3 -92
REVISED
CONTRACT
QUANTITY
BID
t
DESCRIPTION.
U/M
QUANTITY
TO DATE
PRICE
EXTENSION
M oe
LS
1.00
1.00
$46
$46
CLEAR
ACR
0. 68
0.30
$1,600.40 ;
$480.40
CLEAR
THE
325.00
382.00
$30.00
$11
GR,UE
ACP
4.68
0.30
$1 ;
$480.00
GRUB
T
; 315.00
275.00
$30.100
$8,250 ".00
REM REINF CONC PIPE
LF
E 381.00
1004.00
$7.04 i
$1
REM CONC C & G
LF
; 830.00
671.00
$1.00
$0711.00
REM CM CULV P IPE
LF
863.00
930.00
$4.40
$3
REM BIT CURB
LF
1S.v0
'v•vo
$2.OG ,
$G.0;
REM CONC SIDEWALK
SY
77.00
49.15
$2.4�
$9 E .30
REM MANHOLE
EA
3.00
1.00
$140.00r ;
$840.00
RED! C BASIN
EA
, 8.00
8.0;;
$9y . on
�^
$ 20.04 ;
REM SIT PAVT
SY
;24440.00
2531,.00
$2.00
$50,638.00` ,
REM BIT DRIVE PAVT
CY
2568.04
2477.30
$2.75 ;
$6
REM CONC DRIVE PAVT
5
189.
409.70
$6.00
$2, 458.20
REM MiS DEBs;Iu
Cv
; 40.00!
80.00
$20.40 ;
$1,600.00
REM FLAP GATE
EA
1.00
2.00
$150.00
$300.00
SAW CONC PAVT
LF
246.00
118.50
$4.00
$714.00
REM ENERGY DISSIPATER
EA
1.00
1.00
$25O.Gy $2;2.0`0
SAW BIT PAVT
Lt
f 4807
3094.00
$ 1.80 ;
$5 t
SALV REINF CJNC` PIPE
LF
362.00
142.00
$8.00 ;
$1
SALV WIRE FENCE
LF
"98.00
80!.00
$0,75
$64.00
J rr
AL'v C LINE FEN
iF
, n
,�J7 ■r10
4 9• t
40
$i• ;
$
SALV Wu0D6N FENCE
LF
; 102.00
42.00
$1.50
$64.50
SALV RC PIPE APR;II
EA
3.00
0.00
$150.00 ;
$0`.40 1
SALE} CASTING
EA
; 11.00
25.00
$60.00
.$1
cALV & A, ST rOUD Zo
EA
; 1.00
1.00
$1 ;
$1
ABANDON MANHOLE
EA
; 1.00
1=001
$500,00 ;
$500.00
COMM EXCAVATION 4P}
CY
,28311.00
45873.00
$2.90
$133,031.70
COMM CHANNEL EXCAV (P )
CY
; 1700.00
1700.00
$3.50
$5,954.00
SEL TO PSOIL BORROW (LV}
CY
4550.00
1660.00
$6.00 I t
96
SALV TOPSOIL LV
CY
;14016.00
7841.00
$3.70
$29
STABiLILiNG AGGREGATE
C
1 115.00
398.00
$10.00
$3
MATER FOR DUST CONTROL
MGA
; 105.04
8.00
$15.00 ;
$120.00
AGG BASt. CL 5
ION
; 150 =46.50
11194.70
$7.
$86, "58.92
MILL BIT SURF 1 1/2``
S�'
; 2 3b.0V
1:2,00
$3.04
$480.04 '
6" CONC DRIVE PAVT
S`(
; 301.
622.24
$21.00
$13,Oe1.04
SIT MAIL FOR MIX
TON
157.307
173.07
$134.00 ;
$22,499.1.0
r`• t` T
8A�8 MIX
T !
101
i
, 3344 . �?4
! � r
,,ot�J. Cv
$12. ,
$44, 810. V '! ,
BIT MHT'L FOR MIX
TON
190.48
149.33
$130.00
$79,412.90
WEAR
TON
; 3112.04
3540.21
$14,65d
$51
TA,,K
GHQ
1245.00
1385.40
$1.0;
$1,454.25 ,
7l.MI f 511EL i G
S
? V. �
:JG • 0
$ 1
1��,S.�iV. 0 ;
FINE FILTER AGG LV
CY
440.00
0.00
$9.00
$0.00
COARSE FILTER MUG L` v'
CY
; 10710.010
0.00
$16.00
$0.00
15" CS P C.U! ' 14 GA
LF
155,00
268.00
$14.00
$3,752.00
12" RC P CULV CL 5
LF
; 86.00
50.40
$
$90
15" RC P CULV CL 5
LF
, 28.00
10.70
$20.00 ;
$214.00
15 CS P APRON
EA
; 6.00
12.00
$70.00
$844.00
18'' Cv P APRON FOR CP PIPE
EA
; 1.00
3.00
$95.00 ;
$285.00
24" Cv APRON FOR IV PPE
EA
; 1.00
1.04
$120.00
$120.00 {
12" RC P APRON W' TR CD
EA
; 4..00
7.00
$465.00
$3,255.00
15" RC P APRON W /TR GD
Ea
16.00
13.00
$515.00
$6,695.04
18 RC P APRON W /TR GD
EA
; 1.00
2.00
$555.00 ;
$1,110.00
24" RC P APRON W /TR GD
EA
; 5.00
6.04
$850.40 ;
$5
300 RC P APR ON W /TR GD
EA
3.00
3.00
$1,135.00
$3,405.00
36" RC P APRON W /TR GD
EA
1.00
2.00
$1,405.00 ;
$2,810.00
22 SPAN RC P CULV CL %3
LF
'
! 24 , 00
16.0011
r }
$�.� . �4 ,
$ 5 6 0. i
00
22" SPAN HN RC P ARCH m K W;`TG
EA
; 4.Ov
4.00
$495.40 i
,
$1, 934.4Ct 1
43 3/4 RC P AR.CP A PR W,'TG
EHc
; 1.00
2.04
$1 ;
$2
12 CP P SEWER
LF
215.00
215.00
$13,25 1 1
$2,84.75
18`' CP P SEWER
LF
161.40
163.04
$19a14 i
$3,113.30}
2 4" CP P SEWER
LF
, X50.00
223.04
$13.64
$5,
43 3/4" RS P ARCH SWR CL 2
LF
1012.40
102.00
$52.00 ;
$5,304.00
51 1/8" RCP ARC" SWR CL;
IF
; 37.40
42.40
$345. 1
$12
73" RC P ARCH SWR CL 5
LF
; 588.00
584.0=
$158.80
$ °2,139.20
12 RC P SWR DES 3006 CL5
LF
1343.00
980;.00
$16.44 '
i
$15 681;1.00 '
i }
15' RC P SWR 3006 CL 3
LF
; 4E3.00
436.001
$ 18 .00 !
$1,848.00 '
i
�5: R Wk 'v P ,� .�00rr; �;.
Lr
1 00.00
18,28.00
$x5='d }
$35,646.00 !
16 Rv P SWeR 3046 CL 2
Lr
; 43.001
18.00
$40.00 ,
$ 60.0o i
} 8" RC P SWR 300:0 CL 3
LF
; 216.40
274.00
$20.00 ;
$5,$810,40 i
1 RC P SWR 34Cio CL 5
LF
253.40'
464.
$21.Oti
$9,744.00 {
21 �' RC P SCI ; %3v }k 6 CL 2.
LF
66.04
65.04
$21, co
$1 404.00
21" RC P SWR 3006 CL 3
LF
; 325.00
364.00
$22.00
$8,40E?.Ov
24 Rv 1 vWR 30 0 L
L
19�, °JO
82.4
$L3.1.Y }
$ 4 4v i
r+ r� ' t rr � } ^ f r � i `
1 4 C P S*�#� � C 3
L i
Q f ^ (' t
} U`fJ :00
-"s � ( f�
8'77.0
Q' ., n . ,.}
WL4:2-V i
n ., �}
$�.1Li�.`i'. I
22 4 Rv P SWR %"I; 06 vL 4
LF
1V36.0v
10,86.00
$26.00
24" RY P SWR VUGV GL
IF
, 700.0
701.00
$3 1,10 }
$2.2,22.1.70 ,
.. ►s �- - { �,�� f � �
i� L' i� v t V �' J 6 L+ L
i
L F
3 f �? nn
! 1 Lr t 1f J
1
1 v ...�
na (� i
1 L/, ti/ t
4%
30" RC "' wWR 3406 C: 3
LF
} 391.44
1
$ ;
$21. 960.90 i
MC P SWR 3 00 6 ' C l 4
LF
; 98.00
24.40
$37.14 ,
$ 94.40 ,
36" RC P SWR 3006 CL 2
LF
758.04
823.14
$36.50 ;
$30,044.61
3E" RC P SWR 3046 CL 3
LF
, 1663,00
1382.00
$40.003
$55,280.00
36'' RC P SWR 3406 CL 4
LF
t 868,00
981.40
$48.70
$47,774.14
36" RC P SWR 3006 CL 5
LF
; 6.00
$62.55
$0.00
42" RC P SWR 3006 CL 5
LF
1133,00
1133.44
$82,80 1
$93 812.4;
48 RC P SWR 3006 CL 4
LF
; 135.00
135.00
$83.00 ;
$11,205.40
48" RLP P SWP; 3006 CL 5
LF
; 642.00
659.50
$108.00
$71,226.00
4.8 JACKED RC P SWR CL 5
LF
! 160.00
160.00
$620.00 ;
$99 1
INST RC PIPE SEWER
LF
344.00
142.00
$12.00 1
S1
CONST MHOLE DES A
F
60.30
7;.83
$100.00
$7
CONST MhOLE, DES 8
LF
I09.59
112.15
$:30,00
$14,5?9,5v
ONST MROLE DES C
LF
145.50
133.06
$11x.00 ;
$22
CO M D
LF
; 238.74
238.3;
$20'5.00
$48, E5i , 50
( D I ES
V V i1w :11�ULI. YE�1 E
11 F
E 25 . L�
2 4. 18
$ a YY }
$L -Z 7 } LEvl s 114 }
CONST MHDLE DES F
LF
1 9.63
9,8'
$430.00 ;
$0,244.10 4
vG N S T MHO r' D6L C -
L�
! 31.4
36.44
+,� }
$16. 0.00 i
,, �, ,
M07L,40 }
v0NST MH0 D_
Ll
4.95
$�.715.00� I
$1,��C�.00 ;
1 t J ;cc
1VN� 1 L N. ASS I 3 DE11 fl i
L!
} i .:.�
. 4.80'
i��:.64
$150,00 I
$113046.00 I
CONS i C BASIN DES E-1
LF
; 1,: .10
1-63,2/6
$150,00 ;
$1 , 989. 01 }
CONST C BACTN DES C -1
LF
22.91
20.74
$200.00
$4,148.00
CONST C BASIN DES D-1
LF
1 20.9'
8.72
$225.00
$1,962.00
CONST C BASIN DES E-1
LF
; 32.98
33.98
$125.00 ;
$4
CASTING ASSEM TY R-3067 -fir
EA
, .25.00
29.00
$210,00 ;
$6,0 °0.00
k,ASTING ASSEM T1 R-4 1.
EA
, 22.00
28.00
$115.00
$V,210■00 ,
CAST ASSEM TY R-1412A
EA
; 53.00
60.00
$140.00 ;
$8,400.00
CAST AS TY R-1741D
EA
9.00
3,00
$715.00 ;
$2,145.00
CAST ASSEM TY R 2565 -C
EA
, 7.00
7.00
$260.00 ;
$1,820.00
F &I SPEC STRUCT NO I
EA
, 1.00
1.00
$18,700.00
$18,700.00
F «I SPEC STRUC? NO 2
EA
; 1.04
1.00
$5,275. ;
$5,275.00
F&I SPEC STR UCT NO 3
EA
1.00
1 .00
$8,000.00 ,
$E+, U0v.00 ,
BULKHEAD;
EA
21.00
40.00
$100.00 ,
$4,000.00 ,
RANDOM RIPRAR CL 2
CY
; 98.40
173.25
$30.00 ;
$5,197,50
RANDOM RIPRAP CL 3
CY
70.50
65.60
$35.00 ;
$2,296,00
GtOTti�'ILt FILTEFc TY 4
cY
; X78.1'„
519,70
$3.001
$ 1,459s i0 '
4" CONC WALK
601 .00
255.00
$� . 50 ;
$637. 5�t
�ONC C & G 86 A. 8
LF
, '34.00
504.00
C, VV ,
$4,032.00 ,
CC }NG C & G 8512
LF
35:00
2:5.00
$15.00
$3,375.01'
CONC C & G 862
L F
%3
718.00
$9.00
$;,462.00
CONIC C & C3 D412
LF
, 24.00
21.04
$15.00
$v3C3.00 t
PRECAST C0NC CURB
LF
41 4.00
4 Ilk 0.00
8
in r pt
$v
ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLE
EA
2.00
0.6'
$300.00
$201.00
VEHICULAR GATE
E
3.00
4.00
$575.00
$2,30'01.40
TEMP GATE
LF
, 210,0
0.00
$3.5: ,
$0..:00 ,
INST JAL'v CH LINE FENCE
iF
390.00
85
10
$1.50
t`+T Sad r R 3C-
N�, ..h;.t �I��L �Nti.t
LF
54.00'
O.G�
v.7J '
,
v ;
$ •� t
INSTSAL`v' WOODEN FENCE
LF
t 101.00
104.00
$i
$1 56.00 ,
! F &I 6' CH LINE r ENt�E
� r
�.�
k'�
A v4 . 4
2.
�!
0
: v1
r. � S �c �+ r.
$:::� 8 1 4 7 r
s r L
! 'URN 4' CH LINK FEN+""C
LF
160.00'
31
$6.40
$i �4rv'0
COL SPRUCE 6'
EA
� 2,OCt
29.00
$175.00 ;
$5,075.00
MARSHALL ASH 3"
rA
s.r
CC,
2 CC
^,
r.4L
250 0 C
$r�V.ir'v
GR6tN�rIRE L 3
Eh
t 2.40
5.00
$200.00 9
$1,00;,}.00 ,
�cIv BIRCH Iv -' OLJmP
to
2 .00
3.00
$2;10.00 t
$6 v t
NORTHWOOD MAPLE 2 l ; ` �,
EA
i 2.00
21.00
$2.
$4,
,r
ROYALTY CRAB 2
EH
2.00;=
4.00
$200.0 0
JAPANESE LILAC 10'
EA
; 2.00
$200.00
$O.GO
TRHNv EVERvRN T REE
THE
; 10.00
4.00
$50.00 ;
$200. =� t
TRANS E�IERGN TREE 4 -8'
THE
4.0Cli
15.00
$75,00 ;
$1,125.00
TRANS CECIDI.OUS I"
THE
4.00
12.0'0
$50.00 ;
$600.00
TRANS DECIDIOUS" 3"
THE
; 2.00
4.00
$75.00
$300.4vt
TRANSPIL EVER;�RN SHRUB
; H p n
, 6.
5.00
$50.00 I t
$150.00 ,
TRANSPL DECIDIOUS SrRl1S
SHR
6.00
3.00
$50.00 ;
$150.00
SALE CHECK
EA
; 32.00
151.00
$6.00 ;
$906.00
SILT FENCE
LF
; 132.00
200.00
$3.50 ;
$700.00
ROADSIDE SEEDING
ACR
13.44
13.60
$125.00
$1,700.00
SEED MIX 6
LB
834.64
952.00
$2.45
$2,332.40
S"O iY A
5Y
1 1 ,5.0 f1.0G
$1 0 ,
1$ ,;%0La30 ,
MULCH TY I
TON
:5.79
40.80
$125.00
$5,100.00 k
DISC ANCHORING
ASR
; 11.81
13.00
$4
$544.0,30 ;
FERT I0 -10-10
TON
I 2.89
3.35
$250.GC
$83.50
on T r•,3 r
W A U UD' FIBLER r E'L' KET
t
5{
i r r,r
, �64.vJ
n �
0 00.030
$1.00 ;
r.
$6t00
TURF cSTABLISHMEN,
LS
i .0' ^,)
1.00
$25, OOCt.00 ;
$25, 000.0:
LAND=CHPE ROCK
I �
stir
i
t 1.vv
t
1.�C�
r t
E n
$1,3t,�,�
t
, ^ r. �
L� v.y �
TR CONTL
LS
1.00
1.00
$14, 000.00
$1
SUBTOTAL 1
$1 8
can Save di v L
A " PVC SERV PIPE
LF
2546.0
3081.00
$9.50 ;
$29
8' PVC SWR PIPE E-10'
LF
, 421.00
490.00
$9.30 ;
$4 '_
S" PVC SWR PIPE 10 -12'
LF
; 403.00
316.00
$10.00
$3,1601.00
8" PVC SWR PIPE 12-14'
LF
; 3105.00
1278.00
$1:.00
$14
8" PVC SWR PIPE 14 -16'
LF
; 775.00
806.40
$12.50 ;
$10,075.00
8" PVC SWR PIPE 16-18'
LF
; 85.00
19.00
$15.00 ;
$285.00
8" PVC SWR PIPE 18-20'
LF
25.00
0.00
$19.40 ;
$0.00
12" PVC SWR -PIPE 0-8'
LF
; 431.00
427.00
$12.50 ;
$5,337.50 €
12" PVC SWR PIPE 8-10'
LF
; 77.00
83.00
$13.00 ;
$1,079,00
12 PVC SWR PIPE 10-12'
LF
; 156.00
158.00
$14.50
$2,291.00
15 PVC SWR PIPE 16 -18'
LF
; 333.00
0.00
$22.00
$0.00
6" vIP SERVICE PIPE
LF
66.00
105.00
$15.00 f
$1,575.00
E" DIP SWR PIPE
LF
; 498.00
495.00
$20.00 ;
$9
1 DIP SWR PIPE
LF
` 1
�0.0G
' �' C.00
$82.00 '
�; ;
$1 ,
EXCESS DEPT; S T? MNULE
LF
64,50
0 1. 9
$75.0'0
$4,0.19.25
OUTSIDE DROP FOR MOLE
LF
13.50
14.80
$150
$2,22
INSULATION
B F
, L45� ° J�
2 LiiV a av
$� : as
$1 f-w . 1%Y 1
STD MH OLE 0-8'
EA
; 17.00
17.00
$1,100.aa ;
$18,700.00
CONN T EXIS SERVICE
EA
; 68.00
73.00
$150.00 4
$10
CUT IN 8X6" PVC WYE
EA
6.00
13.00
$2.50.00 ;
$3
8X6" PVC WYE
EA
; 40.00
41.00
$65.00 ;
$2
15X6 PVC WYE
EA
; 3.00
2.00
$15O.OV�
$300.00
REM SAN MHOLE
LF
1.00
9.00
$150.00 ;
$1
CR ROCK PIPE. SUBG'R BACKFILL
TON
50.00
220.40
$10.00
$2
AGG PIPE SUBGR BACKFILL
TON
50.00
848.x0
$10.00
$E,,48'0.00
SERV INSPECTION TRENCH
LF
; 370.00
306.00
$10.00 ;
$3
BY -PASS PUMPING
LS
I. ^v0
1.00
$8,000.00 ;
$5.000.00
sA6 I V REPL SAN MH c AVTil F �:l
EA
1 0 0.00
6.40
$1.50 00
S U8T%T 2
$il
watermcain
6` CTP WATERMN CL Hi
LF
415; 00
I13 .00
$14.00 1
$
8" DIP WATERMtd CL 52
LF
588.00
406.00
$15.10
$6.130.60
6" Mi RS G VAL & BOX
EA
11.00
i3
$385.0
8 "%J RS G VAIi!E a BOh
EA
4.00
o. a0
$505. av
V
ADJ GAGE VA LVE ELX
EA
4.00
9.00
$600 ,
$900.00 ,
ML1 FITTING 12" & SMALLER
LEE
, 3111.00
3196=00
$1.00 ;
$L,196.00
RELOCATE HYDRANT
EA 3 .00
4.00
$700.av ;
$2
OFFSET 1" COPPER SERVICE
EA
; 8.00
10.00
$150.00
$1,500.00
TRENCNTNG FOR 6" ON 6" WET
TAPER
3.00
2.00
$300.00
$600'.00
INSULATION
BF
; 9370.00
10731.00
$1.00 ;
$10,731.00
OFFSET 6" DIP WATERMN
EA
; 2.00
2.00
$800.00 ;
$1,600.00
OFFSET 8" DIP WAT ERMN
EA
; 3.00
2.00
$850.00 ;
$1,700.00
OFFSET 16 DIP WATERMN
EA
.1.00
0.00
$2,400.00"
$
TRENCHING FOR WATER SERVICE
LF
; 381.00
100.00
$8.00 ;
$800.00
I" COPPER SERVICE
LF _;
07.00
67.00
$15,00 ;
$1,005.00
I" CURB STOP & BOX
EA
11.00
11.00
$75.00 ;
$825.00
NO UN IT PR,CE IN ORDI CONTRArT
OUB1 61 3 $3 } 6 70 .00 i
s s
I f
SUBTU 1 A t • 9 1
S L $1 74,561. 0 115 ,
SUBTOTAL 3 ; $55,670.60 ;
------------ ' --------- - - - - -'
i 1
TOTAL AMOUNT EARNED $1
MATERIAL ON SITE $0,00
�,HANbt OPi�1cR0 $2, UL.ly "y )
GROSS AMOUNT DUE $1
LESS RETAINAGE $0.00
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE $I,950 ; 99.90
LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS $I
AMOUNT DUE THIS APP. $I9 ^,324.44
APPI- KATION FOR PAYMENT - Continued
Total Contract Amount $ -/. 106 9 -� Total Amount Earneu
_ �-
Material Suitably Stored on Site, /Not Incopo into Work
Contract Change Order No .
Percent. Compl ete
Contract Change Order yo •
Contract Change Order. No .
$ 03 7 8
$ C;1 � 13 _>
3 --
GROSS AMOUNT DUE..... 0400
LESS % BETA I NAG E ......... $
AMOUNT DUE TO DATE.
LESS PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS..... $ A
AMOUNT DUE ZtiIS APPLICATION.... a
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT -'
he undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that (1) all previous progress.
payments received from the Owner on account of work performed under the contract referred to
above have been applied by the undersigned to discharge in full all obligations of the under-
signed incurred in connection with work covered by prior Applications for Payment under said
contract, and. (2) all
material and equipment Incorporated in said Project or otherwise listed in or covered by this
Application for Payment are free and clear of all liens,* claims, security interests and
encumbrances.
Dated s ,3 19 &1 z .
PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INC. '
Contracto
COUNTY OF 49m ~ SS
STATE OF - - i non
8y j �G yl)__66 V p-- E-K
Name and Ti tl e
3efo.re me on this -3 day of 4 u U-S 19 c - personally aapeared
/, k n6wn to me, w o being 7u7y sworn, did depose
and say that he is the ; � of the Contractor above mentioned;
t (Of wce )
a
that he executed the above App i P d
{ pp cation for Payment an Affidavit on behalf of said Contractor,
and that all of the are true correct and co l ete
r,
PATR N � IA A. CIZI U K .
a M Commission Ex pi �- -.... No.ARY PUSLId= MINNES���
H �� ',4NEPIN COUNTY Notary . Pub "c
1 ` Py":;mmisflon �' an. 11,1Y9J
i i
The undersigned has chec x ed vt the Contractor Application for Payment shown above. A part of
this Application is the Contractor's Affidavit stating that all previous payments to him
under this Contract have been applied by him to• di scharge in full all of his obl igations in
connection with the work covered by all prior Applications for- Payment.
In accordance with the Contract the roves undersigned a payment to the Contractor of the
� NP P �
Amount Due.
SHORT L H IC, 0.
Date Z �-
BY
4
Page I - O f 11
Percent Complete
Percent Complete
..
AGENDA NO. ( `" /
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Assistant City Manager &Of'n A l C�
PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT
September 1, 1992
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council
Endorsed.
Mo dif i e a
B e j ected
fat
On July 9, 1992, the City Council accepted the preliminary design and study of the
proposed community center by Ankeny, Kell, & Richter and directed staff to schedule a
public hearing for the project on September 14, 1992.
BACKGROUND
The idea of constructing a community center in Maplewood started over three years
ago. The major steps that have occurred in the evolution of this project are:
October, 1989: The first community survey was conducted about City services,
demographics. There was a very positive response about the
construction of a community center.
July, 1990: The City Council appointed the Community Center Advisory
Committee to make a formal recommendation to the City Council
whether or not the proposed center should proceed.
November, 1990 The Community Center Advisory Committee recommended to the
City Council that the project proceed and contain a wide variety
of components including a swimming pool, gymnasiums, senior
and teen centers, meeting rooms, walking/running track, and
theater.
April, 1991: The City Council authorized a consultant, Springsted, Inc., to
examine potential revenues and expenses to determine if the
center could be a break -even operation.
Summer, 1991: The City purchased ten acres of property fronting on White Bear
Avenue south of County Road B adjacent to the City Hall site.
The land was purchased as the primary site for the proposed
center, and if the project did not move forward, the property was
planned to be redeveloped.
1
Springsted, Inc. submitted the feasibility report which concluded
that a need for a community center in this area did exist, and
that in the estimated operating costs of the proposed center
would probably exceed the potential revenues by 5% during a
typical stabilized operating year.
Early, 1992: The City Council hired the architectural firm of Ankeny, Kell &
Richter (AKR) to conduct the preliminary design and
construction cost estimate for the center,
July, 1992: AKR presented the first design and construction cost estimate.
The 86,000 square foot building was designed to include two
gymnasiums, a leisure and exercise pool, meeting rooms, banquet
facilities with a catering kitchen, multi- purpose rooms, senior
and teen centers, walking/running track, and a performing arts
theater. The estimated cost of construction is $11,200.,000.
August, 1992: The City Council hired Decision Resources, Ltd. to conduct a
second community survey to collect residents' opinions about
new issues facing the City such as street maintenance and
consolidation of services with neighboring cities as well as re-
asking residents their opinion about the construction of the
proposed community center. The results are expected in mid to
late September.
DISCUSSION
If the City Council decides to proceed with the project, there are several issues which
must be addressed and decided upon.
Architectural and Engineering Fees
The Council directed the Manager to negotiate with the architectural firm to determine
the fees for final plans and construction. We met with AKR to talk about fees, and they
presented a quotation for services based on the $9,861,703; 86,000 square foot project.
They proposed a lump sum fee of $724 which is a 7.5% fee. The fee includes all
architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, swimming pool and engineering
services, and a $15,000 credit was given for the preliminary design study that was just
completed. In addition, a $3,000 allowance for a theater /acoustical consultant was
added.
If the City hires a construction management firm, AKR will deduct $13,000 for cost
estimating for a total fee of $711,000. (This is a service that the CM performs).
Additional savings may happen if the CM reduces the need for the architect to be on
site during the construction phase. The City will not be charged for the hours that the
architect is not on site. The proposal also includes a not to exceed figure of $35,000
for reimbursables which includes mileage and other transportation, long distance
communications, reproductions, special handling of drawings and specs, postage,
computer -aided drafting, and additional insurance coverage requested by owner. The
contract with AKR will be a standard American Institute of Architects document.
2
Method of Construction
There are many different ways that a project of this size can be constructed. One way
is the traditional general contractor approach. The architect's construction documents
are used for bidding, the lowest responsible general contractor bid is accepted, and
construction begins. This is the method the City has used for past projects.
Another approach is to hire an owners representative. This individual would be
responsible to assist the architect and engineers during the final design phase to watch
for overdesign, oversights, and quality vs. cost. This is called value engineering. In
addition, the person would oversee the entire construction phase. Director of Public
Works, Ken Haider, was the City's owner's rep for the construction of City Hall and the
addition/renovation. For a project of this size, a full -time person would be appropriate.
Ramsey County is using an owner's rep for the construction of the suburban libraries.
The owner's representative is generally paid on a daily rate (approximately $325) for
the length of time that their services are required. Based on the architect's estimate of
4 months for pre - construction document preparation and 14 months of construction, the
cost of an owner's rep would be approximately $105,000.
Another approach is construction management. Construction management is a way to
erect a building without using a general contractor. The construction manager (CM) is
hired by the owner (City) to represent our interests and coordinate the responsibilities
of the City, architect, engineers and subcontractors. The CM is a key player in the pre -
construction phase during which time the final design and construction documents are
completed. The CM is also an integral part of the construction phase. The CM takes
the place of the general contractor during the construction. CM fees are generally
2.75% to 3.25% of the project.
The benefits of using a construction manager are:
1. The CM is selected based on qualifications -not low bid as compared to a
general contractor.
2. There is an owners representative throughout the project. The CM represents
the interests of the City. The CM has no financial interest in the project other
than the predetermined fee that is negotiated up front. The cost savings in the
design and engineering are the owner's savings- -not the general contractor's.
3. The CM works with the architect for different cost/benefit options. It is during
the final design phase when the type of light fixture or door hardware is
determined. The cost of these items must be weighed with the benefit or quality
that we want. This is the built -in check and balance between the
architects /engineers and the CM during the design phase that save the owner
money during the bid and construction phase. One of the CM's jobs is to catch
the overdesign and oversights. This benefit greatly reduces the number of
change orders needed.
4. There is an open communication between all team members - the architect, the
owner and the CM. In the traditional general contractor format, each discipline
works independently with very little interchange of ideas and suggestions.
3
S. Multiple bidding of each project section saves the owner money and allows
greater flexibility. when each project section is bid separately, the general
contractor's mark -up is eliminated. In addition, the owner can award the
contracts based on performance, ability to meet the schedule and the lowest price
on each component. It allows the owner to reject specific sections of the work if
the bids are unreasonable. The owner can also solicit as many qualified bidders
as possible rather than only bidding the complete package by general contractors.
6. Bids are vied by the CM for accuracy prior to award.
7. There are numerous advantages during the construction phase. Scheduling is a
priority with the CM. The project will be finished on time. The CM establishes
the master schedule with the owner and architect. The subcontractors are
scheduled as part of the bid package. The CM monitors the subs to make sure
they stay on schedule. In the traditional method, the general contractor is the
only organization who is put on a schedule.
Cost control is another advantage during construction. The CM constantly
monitors all costs and change orders. when a change order is requested, the
CM, architect and owner consider options and independently price items before a
decision is made.
The Construction Manager provides on -site supervision and represents the
owner's interests and improves trade's accountability.
For greater control, the owner pays the subcontractors directly.
Financing
The financing of this project will be a combination of property taxes and tax increment
revenues. Approximately $7.6 million of the estimated $13 million project costs will be
financed by tax increment revenues. These tax increment revenues are generated by six
increment districts within the City.
Based on the financial projections, the proposed project would increase the City's
portion of the 1994 property tax levy by 4 %. The impact of this 4% increase in 1994
on a $80 house is approximately $7. Property ax levies in subsequent ears for
�Y q Y
the community center bonds are estimated to increase 3% per year. However, the
increases in the City's tax base due to new construction will artiall offset this 3%
P Y
increase, and it is estimated that the 4% (or $ 7 increase) will remain constant over the
life of the bonds. Attached you will find a more detailed report about the project
financing prepared by Finance Director Dan Faust.
Time Line
If this project should proceed, the following schedule is a projected time line for
completions
Mid to late summer: Council decides to proceed or not to proceed.
Staff requests proposals for construction manager.
Late summer: Council approves contract with construction management
firm and architectural firm for final design and construction.
Winter of 92 -93: The bidding phase for the foundation begins.
Spring, 1993: Additional subcontracts are bid and awarded.
Construction continues.
Winter to early spring, 1994:
Construction complete. Grand Opening,
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council has two options- -not to proceed with the project or to go ahead with
it.
1. If the Council votes not to go forward with the project, there would be no
further recommended action.
2. If the City Council votes to proceed with the proposed project, they should:
A. direct staff to request proposals for a construction management firm; and
E. direct the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into an agreement with
the architectural firm of Ankeny, Kell, and Richter for the design
development in accordance with the previously negotiated fee structure.
5
ME NO RAN DUN
TO: Assistant cit Mana
FROKZ Finance Director
D 40
A%Mr a PROP.BRTY TAX XMPACT OF COMMMI TY C-9HTER
DATHO a-
September 1, 1992
It- is anticipated that two bond issues would be used to finance the
communit center project if it is approved. The first bond issue
would be in the sprin of 2993 and would be approximatel
$7 1 0-00,0000 The second bond i s sue would be in the fall of 1994 ' and
would be approximatel $1,615,,000. Remainin project costs would
be fina b tax increment monies on hand and anticipated
a dditional tax increment revenues expected to be received in 1992
throu 1994.
0 0
PrIncina
and interest pa on the bonds issued for the
Communit Center are planned to be financed b propert taxes and
tax increment revenues from six tax increment districts. Based
upon Information currentl available, the first propert tax lev
for the Communit Center bond issues would be $325., 000- and would be
pa In 1994 This would cause the Cit propert tax lev to
increase b approximatel 4-t assumin that the Cit total
propert tax lev for 1994 will be the same as the amount in the
0
Proposed 1993 Bud ($325,,000 divided b $7,415,20D 4W
Subse propert tax levies for the Communit Center bond issues
wou increase b 3 annuall which- would be offset at least
partiall b new buildin constructed. (The estimated market
value of the Cit tax base increased annuall b 6.18t over the
past ten y ears.)
The impact of this 49 increase on an $80,000 house is approximatel
$7. This is based upon the assumption that taxes pa in 1994
on an $80., 000 house will be approximatel $168 which is the current
anticipated propert taxes for 1993. The actual amount will be
affected b chan in the Cit tax base, HACA, fiscal
disparities, timin of the bond sales, interest rates on the bonds
and factors that determine the annual tax increment revenues for
the six tax increment districts.
C.* Assistant Finance Director
CCTAX.IMM
AGENDA ITEM &-
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish
SUBJECT: Holloway Avenue, Project 87 -14— Assessment Roll
DATE: September 4, 1992
The assessment hearing mailing list is transmitted herewith. A resolution is attached to order
the adoption of the assessment roll.
f:7:Ti
ic
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council
has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the
construction of Holloway Avenue, east from Beebe Road, north to Furness Street, as
described in the files of the city clerk as Project 87 -14 ,and has amended such proposed
assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to
be benefited by the proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over
a period of nineteen (19) years ,the first of the installments to be payable on or after the
first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid, for from municipal funds by
levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments
here n made, upon any properties abutting an the improvement but not made, upon any
properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may
be .served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are
made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city
by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the some manner as other municipal taxes.
AGENDA ITEM G . 3
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council;
Endorsed ..
TO: City Manager Modifies
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Rejected
Date
SUBJECT: Roselawn Avenue, Jackson to Rice, Project 87 -01 assessment Roil
DATE: September 4, 1992
The assessment hearing mailing list is transmitted herewith. A resolution is attached to order
the adoption of the assessment roll.
M I S IA
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council
has met and heard and passed . on all objections to the proposed assessment for the
construction of Roselawn Avenue, Jackson Street to Rice S as described in the files of
the city clerk as Project 87 -01, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems
just.*
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
(. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to
be benefited by te proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over
a period of nineteen (19) years ,the first of the installments to be payable on or after the
first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal fu* nds by
levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments
herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any
properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutFing properties which may
be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are
made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city
by .adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
AGENDA. ITEM & .. * 41
AGENDA REPORT Action by Council,
Endorsed
TO: City Manager Modifiers
Red ected
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date
SUBJECT: TH 61- County Road B Storm Sewer, Project 90 -14— Assessment Rol)
DATE: September 4, 1992
The assessment hearing mailing list is transmitted herewith. A resolution is attached to order
the adoption of the assessment roll.
0
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council
has met . and heard and posed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the
construction of TH 61- County Road B Storm Sewer, as described in the files of the city clerk
as Project 90 -14, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands. named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to
be benefited by the proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over
a period of nineteen (19) years ,the first of the installments to be payable on or after the
first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by
levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments
herein .made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any
properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
41 changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may
be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are
made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city
by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA 'REPORT Action by Council:,
Endorse
TO: City Manager Modified
Rejectecl
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date
SUBJECT: Beam Avenue, TH 61 to County Road D, Project 88- 12— Assessment Roll
DATE: September 4, 1992
The assessment hearing mailing list is transmitted herewith. A resolution is attached to order
the adoption of the assessment roll.
FaM
i
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the city council
has. met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the
construction of Beam Avenue, TH 61 to County Road D, as described in the files of the city
clerk as Project 88 -12, and has amended such proposed .assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to
be .benefited by the proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over
a period of nineteen (19) years ,the first of the installments to be .payable on or after the
first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
1992.. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by
levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments
herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any
properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may
be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are
made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420,051, to reimburse the city
by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments
shall- be collected and paid over in the some manner as other municipal taxes.
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council:'-
Endorse
TO:, City Manager Modifies
Rejected
FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date
SUBJECT: Larpenteur. Avenue , I -35E to Edgerton, Project 86 -27— Assessment Roll
DATE: September 4, 1992
The assessment hearing mailing list is transmitted herewith. A resolution is attached to .order
the adoption of the assessment roll.
jc
Attachment
RESOLUTION
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by low,, the city council
has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the
construction of Larpenteur Avenue east from 1 -35E to Edgerton Street (CSAH 58), as
described in the files of the city clerk as Project 86 -27, and has .amended such proposed
assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA:
I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a coy of which is attached hereto
and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to
be benefited by the proposed improvement int he amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over
a period of nineteen (19) years ,the first of the installments to be payable on or after the
first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7.5 percent per annum
from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,
1992. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the
future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by
levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments
herein. made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any
properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may
be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are
made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention
of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city
by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments
shall be collected and paid over in the some manner as other municipal taxes.
G %ago7
MEMORANDUM
lotion by Counci •
11 \
End
Modifie
Rejected_ `
Date
J,
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Associate Plannera
SUBJECT:
Land Use Plan Chan e, Street and All Vacation
g y
�.
and Preliminary Plat ?�
APPLICANT:
Maplewood Development, Inc.
PROJECT:
Northwood Village
DATE:
August 5, 1992
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Maplewood Development Inc. is requesting that the City Council approve:
1. The vacation of three undeveloped streets and an alley. These include parts of
Lark Avenue, .Laurie Road, Sandhurst Avenue and the alley between Cope and
Lark Avenues. (See the map on page 11.)
2. A 24 -lot preliminary plat for single dwellings. The plat name is Northwood
Village. (See the plat map on page 14.)
I am recommending that the City change the land use plan for the plat area. This
change is from RM (residential medium - density) to RL (residential low- density). (See
the maps on pages 12 and 13.)
This property is north of County Road B and west of Birmingham Street. (See the maps
on pages 10 and 11.)
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan Change
The land use plan on page 12 shows that the City is planning most of this site for RM
(residential medium- density) use. This designation is for double dwellings, town houses
and small apartment buildings. The exception is the lots on Birmingham Street. The
City is planning this land for RL (residential low- density) use. The RL designation is
primarily for single dwellings. I have shown the proposed change of the land use plan
on page 13.
The proposed change is compatible with the neighborhood. The surrounding property
is developed with single dwellings.
The change in the land use plan would benefit the surrounding neighborhood by
reducing the allowed density on the site. This means there would be less traffic than if
the property developed according to the current land use plan. Some of the neighbors
are concerned about increased traffic from this project. The proposed project would
have only 2.68 units per acre. The current RM designation would allow up to 7
apartments per acre.
Street and Alley Vacations
There is no public need for the three undeveloped streets and the undeveloped alley on
this property. The developer will be dedicating new streets with the plat. The
vacations will allow the developer to plat lots and streets that meet current City
standards. With the alley, the City should keep a drainage easement and a utility
easement for an existing NSP power line.
DLelim�in Plat
Ponds and Drainage
The developer is proposing to drain most of this site into the new City storm -water
pond that is south of this site. The developer will drain the north end of this site by
building a storm sewer along the north property line. This pipe will drain the rear parts
of Lots 15 - 19 and the rear of the properties at 1392, 1404 and 1410 Cope Avenue.
Trees
There are a variety trees on this site. The developer has proposed to remove 19 large
trees and save 18 large trees. He also is proposing to replace the large trees that he
will be removing with new trees. This would meet the Cites environmental protection
ordinance.
Density
A concern of several neighbors is the density of the proposed plat. The City has
planned most of this site RM (medium - density residential ). Medium density residential
allows for most types of multiple - family housing at 4.9 to 7.0 units per acre. The
developer is proposing an average density of 3.3 houses per acre with the plat.
The average lot size would be 13,180 square feet. This is larger than most of the
surrounding lots, which are between 10 ,000 and 12,000 square feet.
Traffic
Another concern of several neighbors is the amount and speed of traffic from this
2
development on Birmingham Street and Cope Avenue. The City has identified Cope
Avenue between White Bear Avenue and English Street as a minor arterial street. The
City designed this street to handle 7,000 - 10,000 vehicles er day. In 1989 the State
p Y
counted 1650 vehicles per day on Cope Avenue between Hazelwood and English
Streets. Thus, this street can accommodate all of the 250 daily ehicle trips that this
Y p
development would create. I also expect several of the trips that this development
generates would use County Road B to go to the east or west.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt the resolution on page 17. This resolution changes the land use plan from
RM (residential medium - density) to RL (residential low- density) for the
Northwood Village property. This change is because:
a. The developer is. proposing to develop this site for single dwellings.
b. The City has zoned the site R-1 (single- dwelling residential).
C. The surrounding properties have single dwellings.
d. This change would reduce the allowable density and haffic from this
property.
2. Adopt the resolution on page 18. This resolution vacates the Lark Avenue
right -of -way, west of Birmingham I Street because:
a. It is in the public interest.
b. The City does not need this right -of -way. The developer will be
dedicating new street rights -of -way on. the final plat.
30 Adopt the resolution on page 19. This resolution vacates part of the Laurie Road
right -of -way that is west of Birmingham Street because:
a. It is in the public interest.
b. The City does not need this right -of -way. The developer will be
dedicating new street rights -of -way on the final plat.
4. Adopt the resolution on page 20. This resolution vacates part of the Sandhurst
Avenue right -of -way, between County Road B and Birmingham Street because:
a. It is in the public interest.
3
b. The City does not need this right -of -way. The developer will be
dedicating new street rights -of -way on the final plat.
5. Adopt the resolution on page 21. This resolution vacates the undeveloped alley
between Cope and Lark Avenues. This vacation is subject to the City keeping a
drainage and utility easement over the alley. The City should vacate this alley
because:
a. It is in the public interest.
b. The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. The developer
will be dedicating new street rights -of -way on the final plat.
6. Approve the Northwood Village preliminary plat. Approval is subject to the
following conditions:
a. The City En gineer approving final grading, utility, ge, erosion
control and street plans. The developer shall increase the size -of the
water main to eight inches on the utility plan. The erosion control plan
shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District
Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook.
b. The developer shall sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that
the developer will complete all public improvements and meet all City
requirements. This agreement shall include the developer having NSP
install a street light at the corner of Ide Street and Laurie Road.
C. The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan, based on
the City's environmental protection ordinance. The Director must approve
this plan before the developer does any site grading or the City approves
the final plat.
d. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These
easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines
and five feet wide along the side properly lines.
e. Change the property lines on Lots 2, 3 and 4. This change shall be so the
property - lines are perpendicular to Laurie Road and radial to the Ide
Street cul -de -sac.
L Change the property line between Lots 20 and 21. This change shall be
so the property line is radial to the cul -de -sac.
g. Change the name of Laurie Avenue to Laurie Road.
�11
h. Remove the house and two garages on Lots 1 and 2.
i. Remove the house and garage on Lots 17 and 19.
j. Change the right -of -way at the transition point with the cul-de -sacs to
meet City standards.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of
Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final
plat.
5
CITIZEN COMMENTS
We asked the owners of the surrounding property for their opinion of this project. City
staff sent surveys to the 63 property owners within 350 feet of the site. We received
30 replies. 14 replies were for the project, 11 were against and 5 had no comments.
Those people for the project had the following comments:
1. It will improve the residential focus for the neighborhood.
(Dakotas Children, Inc.)
2. Single - family is better than multiple here. (Cave and Associates)
3. I am favor of this proposal if we are not charged assessments. (Steinbring -
2222 McAfee Circle)
' 4. That is the type of use that best suits the area. (Brenhofer - 2246 McAfee Circle)
5. If similar to McAfee Circle. It would maintain or increase the quality of the
neighborhood. (Elftmann - Brooklyn Center)
6. I want to see single family - not multi - family. (Nelson - White Bear Lake)
7. I have been dealing with Mario Cochiarella in this property sale. (Zeirnet - 2241
Birmingham)
8. We would like to see the Grape's property cleaned up. It is such a mess. (Lewis
1423 Sandhurst)
9. I like single family homes. (Shoop - 1428 Sandhurst)
10. I am in favor of this proposal as long as it does not affect the M -1 zoning of my
property north of Cope Avenue.
(Meyer - Dayton's Bluff Sheet Metal)
11. See the letter on page 15.
Those against the proposal had the following comments:
1. I feel that the open land enhances my property. I think planting trees and
leaving the area as an undeveloped open space or wildlife area would be
acceptable. (Lawrence - 2204 McAfee Circle)
�01!
20 It will destroy wild life. I question putting 24 houses in that area. (Munson -
1378 Cope Avenue)
3. I am concerned about water run -off by raising the grade in Lots 17 and 18 and
the two north east lots on Birmingham. I realize the storm sewer will handle
most of it but I would not want to see our flood plain diminished by filling in
those lots. We have had water ponding problems in the past and need the area
behind 1392 and 1404 Cope Avenue for run -off. I also would like to see as
many trees preserved for wild life. We have a lot of animals living in the area
since the Cave development was completed. The other problem would be an
increase in traffic on an already busy unpatrolled street. I think Northwood
Village could be a nice addition to the area if these things are considered, being
especially sensitive with the natural setting. I would not want water directed to
the north by building up the areas on Lots 17, 18 and 19. (Blomquist - 1392
Cope)
40 Maplewood is overdeveloping. It seems to me that there is less and less open
space. I think the number of houses should be dropped between 15 or up to 20.
We pay higher taxes for good schools and land. It is getting to look no different
then Saint Paul. What about increased traffic on Cope Avenue? It is already
traveled at greater than its posted speeds. Since no one can patrol a street 24
hours a day, what about a three way sign at Cope and Birmingham? I know that
it is the public works area, but a development will mean more traffic than now.
What about the grade of the land on adjacent property? I do not want to be
sitting looking at a hill. Will the homes be walkouts?
(Markland - 1404 Cope Avenue)
5. I have negative feelings only because it would increase traffic on Cope and
Birmingham. (Pearson - 1420 Cope Ave)
6. The population density is already too high. (Shingler - 1431 Cope Avenue)
7. This open property does not need to be developed at all. It will do us no good
and only cost us money. (Mellinger - 1443 Laurie Road)
8. It will disrupt the environment - there will be no fox, pheasants, cardinals or
blue jays plus the accrued Sandhurst which attaches are property would be close
to the side of where our garage should be. It will lower the value of my house
and increase traffic which is already bad for the children because there are no
side walks for them to play on. Also, it was agreed that when they uprooted the
large trees for the holding pond they promised to replace them.
(DeChaine - 2191 Birmingham Street)
9. Weaver school is too crowded. Make it into a bike or running track. (Siltman -
1428 Lark Avenue)
10. Too many homes for that parcel of land. Single homes are fine but 24 homes for
that parcel seems too small parcels of land for each home. It is pretty good we
pay for sewer improvements and builders just move in and take over. I hope its
not just another low housing units. We moved out here for space, not much
space left. Taxes don't come down.
(Beyer - 2297 Barclay Street)
11. See the letter on page 16.
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Area: 8.95 acres
Existing land use: Two houses and accessory buildings.
Property Ownerst Eugene and Florence Grape.
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Houses along Cope Avenue.
East: Houses along Birmingham Street.
South: A house (1397 County Road B) and a City storm water pond. Weaver
Elementary School is across County Road B.
West: The Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way. There are houses west of the
railroad right -of -way.
HISTORY
February 21, 1980: The City Council vacated the east 240 feet of Sandhurst Avenue,
west of Birmingham Street. The Council also vacated the alley between Laurie Road
and Sandhurst Avenue.
October 10, 1983: The Council considered a change to the land use plan from RM
(residential medium - density) to RL (residential low - density). This was for the area
between Birmingham Street and the railroad right -of -way and between County Road B
and Cope Avenue. This included the area of this plat. The Council changed the plan
from RM to RL for just the lots fronting on Birmingham Street and Cope Avenue. The
City made this change because the owners of this land had developed all their lots,
�091
except one, with single dwellings. This change did not effect the undeveloped property
between Birmingham Street and the railroad that the City had planned RM.
,Tune 22, 1992: The Council vacated the undeveloped alley between Lark Avenue and
Laurie Road and between Birmingham Street and the railroad right -of -way,
mb\memo78
go\B -3: memo78.mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. land Use Plan Map (Existing)
4. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed)
5. Proposed Northwood Village Plat
6. Letter: McDonald
7. Letter: Nelson
8. Land Use Plan Change Resolution
9. Lark Avenue Vacation Resolution
10. Laurie Road Vacation Resolution
11. Sandhurst Avenue Vacation Resolution
12. Alley Vacation Resolution
9
vauNa wt
F RREN Knuckl e Head Loks pst��
y COPE CT C AV COPE co A
s
j LARK AV
CO o RD "8" � '` LJURIE mom
a t .
2 cc IElANO RD � SAN - HURST c�c "'O��Z A � _ � C
z
JUNCTION ST o Y CO > RD
0
P� E AV 10 � R o /9bb1�11ooJ AV
(1) Ct1AMdER3 ST y (� t`s m ELORIOG A/ s,�p,!
8 ; cri
6 � a �pIL
8 � KI w a .� �� RECREAT /ON,�
PP Rt� 5 (� j AV ? ar av RRIS�'�"`►
N ROSE1M000
RYA � AV ev e
N � Al S
R�GN .
FROST � � �. Z$ �0 (,0
W FE ON AV
Q W t; G bmfsr R AV W
u°c A
FRISEIIE AV y� �P'� o Cr IZI } �
cc Q W p ��
" a R N RIPLEY y Al
z
\ s Z � J J � � L Kc z � = PRiC
�� Q � � PACE �� y
(� V O W V
< 29
...............
62 64 65
LOCATION MAP
.............
..............
.............
.............
.............
.............
SITE
.............. 10 Attachment 1
4
N
�C
o
/ T �
F 0
W k
♦,
V) EH i0 it
� � Il.l. RD
�-
Q W
HDG
1 .. _► o ( i) CON NOR AV
°C
0� MONT
AV �=
0
m 0
.
Sq
V �
$
p
F
h
P�
•
SEXTANT
AV
four
S�vsont
VA iS AV
EM
Q
GERVAIS GERYNS E
VWEV
AV =
CT
�
W
vauNa wt
F RREN Knuckl e Head Loks pst��
y COPE CT C AV COPE co A
s
j LARK AV
CO o RD "8" � '` LJURIE mom
a t .
2 cc IElANO RD � SAN - HURST c�c "'O��Z A � _ � C
z
JUNCTION ST o Y CO > RD
0
P� E AV 10 � R o /9bb1�11ooJ AV
(1) Ct1AMdER3 ST y (� t`s m ELORIOG A/ s,�p,!
8 ; cri
6 � a �pIL
8 � KI w a .� �� RECREAT /ON,�
PP Rt� 5 (� j AV ? ar av RRIS�'�"`►
N ROSE1M000
RYA � AV ev e
N � Al S
R�GN .
FROST � � �. Z$ �0 (,0
W FE ON AV
Q W t; G bmfsr R AV W
u°c A
FRISEIIE AV y� �P'� o Cr IZI } �
cc Q W p ��
" a R N RIPLEY y Al
z
\ s Z � J J � � L Kc z � = PRiC
�� Q � � PACE �� y
(� V O W V
< 29
...............
62 64 65
LOCATION MAP
.............
..............
.............
.............
.............
.............
SITE
.............. 10 Attachment 1
4
N
v
1357
III
p r
CORNER KICK SOCCER
• ,J `N 240# j
• ...
. r.
41b 4
74
PROPOSED STREET VACATION."
=`Q - %00
W ate' •::'
X 2240
1 7
4 N
8 2 223 '
p�
14o fit ij .f S 1 �5)
0
V ALLEY VACATE - 2 .
0)2228 �- D f 22 • 92
) 1 4 C _
h r'•
} 0 2222
2s sc. I"'
5 ?j s 0
s
2 • �
�O Q 10
58) ° �s .,
.381431 Cr (11)
a .o Q t
1 N
i � 7' GO dd
t- �i• M AI
LARK AVENUE
' H f• M ,
'p W
r
2241
CM
r ♦— $ -
PROPOSED STREET •: } .:} Z3 i4 z q*
t
�+ 14S'.71 o - ET VACATION
,TS o 0 70 221fi ,� O w:: :;r:. :;::• ::�.. :'��:; : , 2227 { y
y, C
t J N
d s
•d
1�. o
a
L
o R
I
s
1 - 2210 •
C�
r
L
R
0
a
D
2204
c
2212
s
ib
0
• t'1 is t'� 2 - • r ..;.:; :; '::::.: �; }:.. ,; • , 2201
• PROPOSED STREET VACATION qt �
IVW` TOM
A M N „ -�, `•. •'• :':.j:; ::w.• • :if•:• ;:.I; :; ,': , ;fix • 2191 M I• *` ., „ .. ,. •
::�:. •• .o -eo - SANDH
5kA _ URST
1 ,� "..
.• ►• 00 �. ' ' LO' • .
21 N �o V is 14 POND t N C-4
41D
p,0 1397 ! YM � » V-1 od
�E e
I 1407 0� cal
° K r 7 ►s to 2,11 u 23 24 40 �� ` N N , M et 4
lt► $ 1 O. C L Ot T. N .i Z � � �, � r ar
, o Of ft s:•
.. • o, =
70 s CON •
^� (y - T
�— WEAVER SCHOOL - ROA6
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
..........
.............
.., SITE � PROPOSED VACATIONS
4
N
11 Attachment 2
J;
e
A /
4
. �, • 4 1
dmpw AD lb
w
c O
C =
W
RL = RESIDENTIAL LOW — DENSITY RM = RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY
LSC = LIMITED SERVICE COMMERCIAL S = SCHOOL P = PARK
LAND USE MAP
SITE (EXISTING)
O
M
V
0
O
V
O
Sam
a
E
O
O
V
O
a
E
-i n
I 1 I SC c COPE AVENUE- --
E n Isis xpTl" ■r s "mown srr
r
1
•
s
s
4
O
m
r
�3
Q�
N
12. Attachment
t
lift
O
N
V
0
O
V
be
O
mom
•
IE
O
M
V
O
V
O
e
E
doom
17,
z h�
St
tow
e
4
r,
O
avow ',
RL = RESIDENTIAL LOW— DENSITY RM = RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY
LSC = LIMITED SERVICE COMMERCIAL S = SCHOOL. P = PARK
•
30
oc
e
0
m
•
t
�3
LAND USE MAP
(PROPOSED)
SITE
4
N
13 Attachment 4 "
L
r
�
N
.r
a
e
C
=
�W
RL = RESIDENTIAL LOW— DENSITY RM = RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY
LSC = LIMITED SERVICE COMMERCIAL S = SCHOOL. P = PARK
•
30
oc
e
0
m
•
t
�3
LAND USE MAP
(PROPOSED)
SITE
4
N
13 Attachment 4 "
I - - -- - --r - - - - - - - - Ealao ISOF
i 1 1 � t Se __ wt
z a• - .e: — i1}3' LOT DLO.
try, V-10' 1 t I
5 Z- SUrm
11
1 1 1 1
is
SC A LE I*-SO' 1 1 1 ,n foe t Kft
T
k
V�/
i
n
r
,
a, }
C+
a
(J , drawing has been checked and
.ewed tnisIday of 1914
I o �
2 'Q
y
� I a WTAOE
L -- ` - - - - L - - - - - - -
' ++e► •`� MIMI L ME
Qvq�Afa rQN ��
� -� TYPICAL EASEMENT DETAIL
` �•... TYPICAL LOT D ETAIL
f'� = I , 1O� - `
Dr �...�
E�SyT�►IW(iE - _- -- _ - •. �►Tjy�R .Ie a
`" +r.
�
env I ,.; � •. . -... - �..:. ._
!4'800 I 3.400 _ 9
--• _ ._.� -
►� "71.11'00 -'1 I -- —
� ��
I
I 1 "a I
zz
o
I
/
�T.IDO 1
1m
"ep
60
—1
r
100
afro
Zi -
I
4 3
6 C
I
I
-C
I OAA "m
n4 a i 1 Ii' t K
,400 �.
17 1
�a-- — ;; —I -• — — -��
— —
I
- - �— — — — — — — . — - ++too � �
I
11000.
— — — — —I—
1 1
I•-�— — — — — — — -.�
�
139 1
Q
0.
a
�'
24 I I
10.000 1 ���
I f
1
1 -
40
I *4
�.
�
Ex
a Ex. •
MOUSE i
p 13.800
Y i - � u
-
p
- -
MOUSE - _1 1 _
-
rw
-
CU
aw J
1 '
134 I 3 P
a„t - . ""-
BIRMIN
— — -' a�-- - - - -t— - - - - - -)
T 1 '-"-
I .IP f
i
L_
ileykte - A1love to IN [050{/
TN Atl
- gLtytnatiy dedluted Is III r6cerded plat of •S41IM Ad6ltlne l6
C I seY Co. Nlnh.,• and now o be vacated lyltp within flock 1 In
� � olio tide.
TIM Al originally dedicated In tIA recorded plat of 'Sable Additive to
aT t l :soy co. Nine.,• $04 new ft be vacated lying within (lock , to
I sofa lion.
P ict part of tart Avenue, originally dedicated In the recorded plat of '1Nio
RON, to Gladstone eoeser Co. Ntnn.' as fifth AveAue &Ad nae to be vacated,
' k lies belwen ue nort arty oxtvnslont of the east and wait 11"s of
/cock 6 to said addition.
t part oa Laurie noAedd or, inally An. dedicated In tvenuM recordao plat of •aMle
It11A to Gladstone Rainier Fo. I11• as fourth Ae and aar Ia N
V ated Lich Iles tNlrebn the southerly eetensionsrof the east oed It
11Ma a� dock 6 In said addition.
- -•---
1 land Surveyor tic. b. 11005
I
r �
v �
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Part of 01ocka 3.6 and It. SABIN
AOMITION and adjacent vacated streets
and allay
1
DESCRIPTION
I TOW AREA 8.911 ACRES
$MIT "my Of -%U'f 1. 38 ACRES
rLAtno LOTS 3n,§W s►
VITAL NO LOTS 24
AVElfAft LOT AREA 13.140 Sr
ON08S SIVE DENSITY Z 7% t1111fl11/ AC.
NET SITE OENSITY 3.30 UNIT8/AC
esC Vlatvrvs L; EfiTIFIGATtON T
O S C H O E L L & M A D S O N, INC. PROJECT NAME SHEET TITLE
CK'D A E: d1 RFVISIREVISION i OWNER / DEVELOPER
- -^ . T 1 Anehy raUly that lk,t plan. Nealwaliee, . .
N 100101 was peprel by we « towl" or ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS *PLANNERS
BY Ineri ,vl P#91 604 14 0 1 ear a 4 uly iyffA b "LLAN
I Cep,lne/ I/oles,Meal Engaeer la /e1 I ke — ` --^—'— SOIL TESTING •ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES N
Inn al & $Jale of *to - -
_.. � � - EW 10580 WAYZATA BLVD.
- _ - DaN o1 } -lt aN Ilazojars � MINNETONKA, MN. 55305 LANV 1 ! t•t �,Cit�SIIIUCTiON COMMERCIAL REAL E S TA T E PRELIII�INARY PLAT
I (812 548 -18011 DATE: JUNE, 1992
S.M.I. PROJECT NO. 61302 -022 SHEET I OF 3 SHEETS
June 8, 1992
Kenneth Roberts
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 E Co Rd B
Maplewood NIN 55109
RE: Northwood Project Section 10-29
Dear Mr. Roberts:
Thanks for asking our opinion about the development of the Grape property. My husband.
and I have talked at length about this, since the area we moved away from was suddenly and
heavily developed just after we bought the property.
Our concerns do not focus on the single - family homes. In fact, it would be the best way for
the property to be developed. We moved here from Oakdale, near Bergen Plaza, the
Freedom mini -mall, St. Paul .Harley- Davidson, ... well, u et the picture, We don't want
Y g
the same thing to happen here.
We do have a few concerns, however. We 'would like to know how this development will
affect us after its completion. For instance, will our taxes go up because of this? Also, will
be be getting special assessments against our property for curbs, sewers, etc., that are
needed because of the extra houses? How will traffic on Birmingham be affected? (This
is a concern now, as our street is used as a "freeway" between Cope and Co. Rd. B, with cars
traveling in excess of 40 mph on a regular basis.)
We would appreciate your consideration of these concerns. Perhaps they are unfounded,
perhaps not. Either way, please let us know. We would also like to hear of any public
hearings on the proposal. Thanks again for your time.
Sine ly, A 4
40P
Gloriann McDonald
2181 Birmingham Street
779 -9043
cc: Gary Bastian Mayor
15 Attachment 6
July 13, 1992
Kenneth Roberts - Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
18:80 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Mn 55109
Dear Mr, Roberts,
Please-excuse the delay in our response regarding the development of the land
ajoining our property, as we have been on vacation.
We moved here 10 years ago because of the openness and the serenity of the
area. We believe the addition of the 24 proposed homes would ruin the area.
The addition of these homes and..the revenues they would bring will never make
up the difference between income and the expense of damage they will cause.
Expenses such as larger Elementary and Middle Schools, or additional bussing
because our local schools are already crowded. Upgrading and additional
street maintenance on exsisting roads to handle the increased traffic and
water run off. Maplewood just spent millions of dollors on water run off in
this area, which in our opinion was a waste of money because many problems
still exist and the addition of these homes would only make matters worse.
Also the wildlife in the area will totally disappear. The. nesting pheasants
and ducks will be forced away o killed by the equipment. They have already
lost enough area by the addition of the holding pond and the trees and
habitat cleared away that was never replaced as promised. We have many trees
and shrubs that we have watched grow over the past 10 years that will just be
plowed under just so a few can make a buck.
If developments such as these continue there will be no open land left for
us or future generations to enjoy. We believe the area should be developed
on Birmingham only and leave the openness and plenty of area for the wildlife.
Leslie and Jean Nelson
16 Attachment 7
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development started a
change to the City's land use plan from RM (residential medium -
density) to RL (residential low- `density)
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located between
Birmingham Street and the railroad right -of -way between County
Road B and Cope Avenue
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
10 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on
August 17, 1992. City staff published a hearing notice
in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners as required by law. The
Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a
chance to speak and present written statements. The
Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
that the plan amendment be approved.
2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on
, 1992. They considered reports
and recommendations from the Planning Commission and
City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE. IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve
the above- described change for the following reasons:
10 The developer is proposing to develop this site for
single dwellings.
2. The City has zoned the site R -1 (single- dwelling
residential) .
3. The surrounding properties have single dwellings.
4. This change would reduce the allowable density and
traffic from this property.
Adopted on
, 1992.
mb 17 Attachment 8
res \rm- rl.lup
VACATION RESOLUTION
,WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the
vacation of the following- described street: The part of Lark
Avenue which is between the northerly extensions of the east and
west lines of Block 6 of Sabin Addition to Gladstone.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street
signed a petition for this vacation;
2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on
1992. They recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on
1992. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
abutting property owners as required by law. The
Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City
staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS., after the City approves this vacation, public
interest in the property will go to the following abutting
properties:
Lots 12 through 22, Block 3 and Lots 1 through 12, Block 6,
Sabins Addition to Gladstone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve
the above- described vacation for the following reasons:
10 It is in the public interest.
2. The City does not need this right -of -way because the
developer will be dedicating new street rights -of -way
on the final plat.
Adopted on
, 19929
mb \res \northwood.l
18 Attachment 9
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the
vacation of the following- described street:
The part of Laurie Road, which lies between the southerly
extension of Lots 13 -22, Block.6 of Sabin Addition to
Gladstone.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street
signed a petition for this vacation;
2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on
1.992. They recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on
1992. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
abutting property owners as required by law. The
Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City
staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public
interest in the property will go to the following abutting
properties:
Lots 13 -22, Block 6 and Lots 4 -14, Block 11, Sabin Addition
to Gladstone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve
the above- described vacation for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City does not need this right -of -way, because the
developer will be dedicating a new street rights -of -way
on the final plat
Adopted on
, 1992.
mb \northwood.2 19 Attachment 10
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the
vacation of the following - described street
The part of Sandhurst Avenue which is between the southerly
extensions of the west line of Block 11 in the Sabin
Addition to Gladstone and the east line of Lot 22 of
Block 11 in Sabin Addition to Gladstone.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
10 A majority of the property owners abutting this street
signed a petition for this vacation;
2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on
1992. They recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on
, 1992. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
abutting property owners as required by law. The
Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City
staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public
interest in the property will go to the following abutting
properties:
Lots 15 -22, Block 11 and Lots 7 -11, Block 14, Sabin Addition
to Gladstone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve
the above - described vacation for the following reasons:
10 It is in the public interest.
2. The City does not need this right -of -way, because the
developer will be dedicating new street rights -of -way
on the final plat.
Adopted on , 19920
mb\northwood.123 20 Attachment 11
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Maplewood Development, Inc. applied for the
vacation of the following - described alley:
The alley in Block 3, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, Ramsey
County.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this alley
signed a petition for this vacation,
2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on
1992. They recommended that the City
Council approve this vacation.
3. The City Council held a public hearing on
, 1992. City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
abutting property owners as required by law. The
Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City
staff and Planning Commission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public
interest in the property will go to the following abutting
properties:
Lots 1-22, Block 3, Sabin Addition to Gladstone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve
the above - described vacation for the following reasons:
19 It is in the public interest.
29 The City has no plans to build an alley in this
location. The developer will be dedicating new street
rights -of -way on the final plat.
This vacation is subject to the retention of a drainage and
utility easement over the alley.
Adopted on
, 1992.
mb \Northwood.4
21 Attachment 12
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA
AUGUST 17, 1992
1. CALL O ORDER
Acting airperson Fischer called
the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
29 ROLL CALL
Commissione
Sherry Allenspach
Present
Commissioner
oger Anitzberger
Present
Commissioner
ester Axdahl
Absent
Commissioner
L raine Fischer
Present
Commissioner
Ja Frost
Absent-
Commissioner
Ga Gerke
Prese
Commissioner
Mary artin
Abse t
Commissioner
Gary arson
Pr ent
Commissioner
Willia Rossbach
P esent
Commissioner
Marvin 'gmundik
resent
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. August 3, 1992
Commissioner Anitzber r moved approval of the amended
minutes of August 3, 1 2, adding the Planning Commission's
comments to the Me opo 'tan Council to item 6 c -Metro 2015
Review,
Commissioner Si undik Ayes -- Allenspach, Anitzberger,
Fischer, Gerke, Pearson,
Rossbach, Sigmundik
The motion assed.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Staff circu ted several planning boo lets for the Commissioners
to review. Commissioner Sigmundik mov approval of the amended
agenda, a ding item 6 c -Metro 2015.
Commiss oner Allenspach seconded Ayes- - ANlenspach, Anitzberger,
Fischer, Gerke, Pearson,
Rossbach, Sigmundik
Th¢ motion passed.
5,o PUBLIC HEARING
a. Northwood Village: Land Use Plan Change, Street and Alley
Vacations, Preliminary Plat
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Mario Cochiarella of Maplewood Development, Incorporated,
said he has received approval from the Ramsey- Washington
Metro Watershed District for the site. Mr. Cochiarella said
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 8 -17 -92
he was in agreement with, the recommended conditions of the
staff report regarding removal of the existing structures.
Acting Chairperson Fischer opened the public hearing.
Julie Grape, 2227 Birmingham Street, commented on the size
of her lot. Bonnie Zieman, 2240 Birmingham Street, asked if
the neighbors would be assessed for the catch basin along
Cope Avenue. Staff said there would be no assessments for
the neighbors for the catch basin. Murna Schultz, 2111
Birmingham Street, asked for clarification on the proposed
traffic flow. Randy Blomquist, 1392 Cope Avenue, asked if
the power lines will be moved underground when the catch
basin is installed. Staff commented that normally NSP does
not move the lines underground. Since there were no further
comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Rossbach.moved the Planning Commission
recommend:
(1) Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use
plan from RM (residential medium density) to RL
(residential low density) for the Northwood Village
property. This change is because:
(a) The developer is proposing to develop this site
for single dwellings.
(b) The City has zoned the site R -1 (single
dwellings).
(c) The surrounding properties have single dwellings.
(d) This change would reduce the allowable density and
traffic from this property.
(2) Adoption of the resolution which vacates the Lark
Avenue right -of -way, west of Birmingham Street because:
(a) It is in the public interest.
(b) The City does not need this right -of -way. The
developer will be dedicating new street rights -of-
way on the final plat.
(3) Adoption of the resolution which vacates part of the
Laurie Road right -of -way that is west of Birmingham
Street because:
(a) It is in the public interest.
(b) The City does not need this right -of -way. The
developer will be dedicating new street rights -of-
way on the final plat.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 8 -17 -92
(4) Adoption of the resolution which vacates part of the
Sandhurst Avenue right -of -way, between County Road B
and Birmingham Street because:
(a) It is in the public interest.
(b) The City does not need this right -of -way. The
developer will be dedicating new street rights -of-
way on the final plat.
(5) Adoption of the resolution which vacates the
undeveloped alley between Cope and Lark Avenues. This
vacation is subject to the City keeping a drainage and
utility easement over the alley. The City should
vacate this alley because:
(a) It is in the public interest.
(b) The City has no plans to build an alley in this
location. The developer will be dedicating new
street rights -of -way on the final plat.
Commissioner Anitzberger seconded Ayes -- Allenspach,
Anitzberger, Fischer,
Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach,
Sigmundik
The motion passed.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the Northwood Village preliminary
plat. Approval is subject to the following conditions:
(1) The City Engineer approving final grading, utility,
drainage, erosion control and street plans. The
developer shall increase the size of the water main to
eight inches on the utility plan. The erosion control
plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water
Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control
Handbook.
(2) The developer shall sign an agreement with the City
that guarantees that the developer will complete all
public improvements and meet all City requirements.
This agreement shall include the developer having NSP
install a street light at the corner of Ide Street and
Laurie Road.
(3) The Director of Community Development approving a tree
plan, based on the City's environmental protection
ordinance. The Director must approve this plan before
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 8 -17 -92
the developer does any site grading or the City
approves a final plat. All trees to be.saved shall be
clearly marked on site before any grading is done.
(4) Show drainage and utility easements along all property
lines. These easements shall be ten feet wide along
the front and rear property lines and five feet wide
along the side property lines.
(5) Change the property lines on Lots 2, 3 and 4. This
change shall be so the property lines are perpendicular
to Laurie Road and radial to the Ide Street cul -de -sac.
(6) Change the property line between Lots 20 and 21. This
change shall be so the property line is radial to the
cul -de -sac.
(7) Change the name of Laurie Avenue to Laurie Road.
(8) Remove the house and two garages on Lots 1 and 2.
(9) Remove the house and garage on Lots 17 and 19.
(10) Change the right -of -way at the transition point with
the cul -de -sacs to meet City standards.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the
preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may
waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes -- Allenspach,
Anitzberger, Fischer,
Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach,
Sigmundik
The motion passed.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Conditional Use Permit: Highway 61 Play Systems)
Secretary Olso presented th taff report. Tom Corcoran,
representing Car 'vat Pla ystems, said he was in agreement
with the recommends co itions of the staff report. Mr.
Corcoran said their a ipment would be moved off -site and
stored for the win r mo hs .
Commissioner enspach moved a Planning Commission
recommend a ption of the resolut which grants a
condition use permit to display and sell children's play
equipme outdoors. Approval is subject to the following
conditions:
N -/
Action by Council :l
MEMORANDUM
To: M A... McGuire, Endorser City Manager n od
From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreation -
Subj : Award of Bid for Park Plantings - - Red ec�e�
g P roject 92 3P to
Date: September 4, 1992 Da
Introduction
The Maplewood City Council on June 22 1992 authorized entering
a contract with Bart
into on- Aschman Associates, Inc. for their
services as landscape architects for the p lanting of trees in
seven parks. Plans and specifications were prepared and bids
were opened on Thursday, September 3, 1992, in the Maplewood City
Hall in the presence of Barry Warner, Landscape Architect with
Barton Aschman, and Doug Taubman, Program Coordinator of Parks
and Recreation. (See attached list of bids
Background
Over the past four years, the city Park System has seen the con-
on -
struction and development of Playcrest, Sherwood, Vista Hills
Geranium, and Hillside Neighborhood Parks Harvest Community
mmunity
Park, i k, andHazelwood Soccer Complex. The seventh park, Maplewood
Heights, s a well - established large park and has lost some of
its trees due to windstorms and age,
As part of our planning process, we invited (by use of a special
flyer) neighbors adjacent to the parks and those who could be
impacted by the plantings to a meetin . Notices
g were at the
playgrounds for children to take home. The Map lewood Review has
given us excellent coverage on this ro'ect since '
p its i.nceptlon
and included a good article about the Public Meeting.
On July 21, the landscape architects presented their designs for
the parks and reviewed the tree recommendations with the Park and
Recreation Commission and the public. Changes were suggested,
ggested,
which were incorporated in the designs. (Minutes of this meeting
are incorporated as part of the Park and Recreation Commission
minutes of July 21, 1992)* Final review was '
� made in the field
with staff and landscape architects.
Invitations to bid were published properly in the Ma lewood
Review and Construction Bulletin for three consecutive weeks.
Bids were opened on September 3 and tabulated and reviewed by
Barton- Aschman.
Nine bids were received and tabulated. Midland Nurser was low
bid. at $105,208*00. Mid Y
Midl provided a suitable bid bond and
intends to complete the work without use of any subcontractors.
Midland provided five references for ro ' ects
p � completed between
1988 and 1991 ranging in construction value from $39,500.00 to
$216,0009009 Cl Lents or landscape architects for each of these
projects were contacted and acknowledge that Midland had
1et g com -
p ed the work as specified In an acceptable manner.
With the award
oessful bidder
and insurance
will start in
spring.
of bid on September 14, we will notify the sucq-
immedately and with contracts si ned b'
i1 g bid bonds
filed, it is expected that the fall planting season
earl October and t t
Y he project completed. next
Recommendation
It is requested that the City Council •
• y award the bid for _plantings
in the parks to Midland Nursery in the amount of $105,208.00,
Contract documents between the city and Midland will be are
re
for signatures b p p d
g y authorized personnel. Funds for the Planting
Program have been previously approved by City Council action
MAPLEWOOD PARKS LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS PROJECT
MAPLEWOOD, MN DATE: September 3, 1992
PROJECTNO: 92 -3P
Contractor
Bid Bond
Enclosure
Base Bid
1. Arteka Natural Green
2. Hoffman &McNamara Company
YF- S
3. Friedges Landscaping, Inc.
4. North Metro Landscaping
5. Greenworks, Inc.
6. Fair's Nursery
a I 9 a U
7. Minnesota Valley Landscape
C N Ec k
`� 13 %
S. Buberl Landscaping
9. Midland Nursery
;E S
� � p 5 a p g
10. Tims Lawn and Landscaping
C1;� c K
'� 17 I y 0 �Z
11. Lino Lakes Nursery, Inc.
�F S
� 1 � 1 000
IL �a 3Qus. 0 o
ids
0
AGENDA ITEM rmow*,�,
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council::
TO: City Manager
Endorsed ......es — = -
FROM: City Engineer Modif
Re j ecte
SUBJECT: Assessment Objections — McKnight- Highwood, Project 90.10 Date
DATE: September 4, 1992
Most of the objections received at the August 24 assessment hearing were resolved by the
city council's action eliminating those properties that had previously been assessed. Seven
objections remain to be considered as follows:
• Dennis Davidson, 830 Dorland Road, 13- 28 -22 -22 -0077
Mr. Davidson objects to the storm drainage ditch along the property side lot line.
The ditch is within an easement and was constructed prior to house construction.
Recommendation: no adjustment.
• Carl and Patricia Maidment, 824 McKnight Road S 13 - 28 - - - 0016
Maidments are objecting. to being assessed two storm sewer units Their property has
218 feet of frontage on McKnight Road and an area of about 2.4 acres. Two units
for a parcel this large does not seem inappropriate.
Recommendation: no adjustment.
• Robert F. Nelson, 13.28 -22 -32 -0016
Mr. Nelson is objecting to being assessed three units for storm sewer. The parcel is
8.6 acres in area with approximately 2.3 acres of drainage easement. The
easements were not condemned by the city, but were acquired by the developer of
the Gonyea's Oak Heights subdivision. Given the large area of the parcel, three
units seems appropriate.
Recommendation: no adjustment.
• The remaining four objections are similar in their concerns. There are two main
objections: (1) The lots cannot be split because the houses are in the middle;
Project 90 -10 2 September 4, 1992
(2) They request a variance from hooking up to sanitary sewer within one year as
required by ordinance.
As for as assessments are concerned the lots receiving two sanitary sewer units and
two service units should . be reduced since only one home is being served. However,
since the lots are much larger than normal, two units for storm sewer does not seem
inappropriate.
The recommended adjustments would therefore be as follows:
980 McKnight Road S., 13- 28 -22 -32 -0012
No adjustment.
.1020 McKnight Road S., 13- 28.22 -32 -0013
Reduce assessment by: 1 sanitary sewer unit; 1 sanitary sewer service
1070 McKnight Road S., 13.28 -22 -32 -0020
Reduce assessment by: 1 sanitary sewer unit; 1 sanitary sewer service
1090 McKnight Road S., 13- 28 -22 -33 -0003
No adjustment
In regard to the question of hook up, the ordinance does allow for a variance. It is
recommended that the four properties be granted a variance based on the following:
1. The four properties have functional individual disposal .systems.
2. The distance of hook up to sewer exceeds 150 feet.
3. Hook up will be required by June 30, 1998 . unless repairs to the individual
disposal system is required, then and in that event hook up to sewer would be
required.
KGH
jc
Attachments
ASSESSMENT HEARING APP FORM
PROJECT N0.90 4M10 McHINIGHT /HIGHWOOD
Address of Assessed Parcel Doetetp?d RC/*
Property Identification Number:
- - _
( 12 di;Flt numb r)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form
must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the
close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the city council consider (check one):
a. (_j Deferral of assessment
b. (_) Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
c. Cancellation of assessment
d. (_) Revision of assessment
Reason for the request: •
/(1 Re-ne" I -+ 74 t tT .s ro �%n 1 rc. r
rc'l��n
TI; �S /06 -� O � �oi�Cr c� a lLd � /0 1 "j O/t 7 ' 0
(Print Name) (signature) (Date)
Orio 00,*,0-1qMe1 RO/16
73 r e 0 t 't
(Address of Property Owner) Telephone
�'!': 4-4wz% 0 c/ /� /►� Zip
IV
August 10, 1992
RECEIV. ED
RE
City of Maplewood A1)G 1 1 1992
c/o Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk
1630 E. County Road B --------- • - - - --
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re :. Public Improvement Project 90 -10
ID: 13- 28 -22 -22 -0076
Be it noted that this is our objection to the assessment for two (2)
storm sewer units at $525.00 each for a total of $1,050.00.
.We have stated our objections to Ken Haider, Walt Geisler, Fran Junke•r,
Lucille Aurelius and the Assistant City Manager. About all that can
be said is that most have put up a feeble, irrational explanation as
to why we have been double assessed for one lot or parcel of land.
The first reason given for the double assessment is because we have a
large front footage which could have been two lots. The second reason
.given is that some day we, or a future owner, might tear down our house
and proceed to subdivide and build two houses. This last is an arbi-
trary assumption by the engineers and /or council. To begin with - as
long as we live here things will not change. And when we no longer live
here our heirs have no plans to change the status quo.
Now were the city, at this point - again arbitrarily - survey our land
and plat two lots, said division of our land would cut through our bed-
room and /or bath whether measured from the north or from the south.
If the engineers and council will go back to the time when we platted
our land for devilapment they will recall we were vehemently opposed to
their plans which would have meant going past our house on the north.
We bought this land for the peace and privacy it gave us and we intend
to keep it that way.
This double assessment is penalizing us for having a lot larger than
the size required by Maplewood. This we believe to be most unfair and
unreasonable.
So suffice to say: We object totally and unequivocally to this discrim-
inatory double assessment.
Will sign off here, heeding the advice given us by Norm Anderson:
"Don't say anymore than necessary as you'll just confuse the planners,
engineers and council."
Carl E. Mal 4dA n i
824 South McKnight Road
Maplewood, MN 55119
vtic u.'Y•.:
Patricia L. Maidment
Would. have preferred to present our case at the time of this hearing,
but will be out of town on that date.
ASSESSMENT NEARING APP FORM
PROJECT N0.90 -10, MCKNIGHT /HIGHWOOD
Address of Assessed Parcel � j�/����Q� A
.Property Identification Number: �
L�- z�- z.z -3z
dmmnw� (12 di;Tlt number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form
must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the
close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the city council consider (check one):
a. (_) Deferral of assessment
b. Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
c. (Cancellation of assessment
d. (� Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
c- v in ,-
Q.ACV(/'
Z�L -r- Z( it 7 -
le\ X"_ eo� 417
Joe 7tle 7�x le j�i dg::�, K 4 C _T' lCr t7 It
r�I�
7 der ���-����
r 3
sv Aft al/ off
J.S
/ �ess� �, /�r'r►� ��°_�
Uou A
e m Ire& WV ��l eor
/;I q IV
e-r? �l c�a 0
(Print tame) (Signature) (Date)
5 40 l� - 7 4
.s lz1 - - - (Address of Pro. erty Owner) Telephone
S7'` l/' LV �-1 � �h zip
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
PROJECT NO e 9 0 - 10 , MCKNIGHT /HIGHWOOD
Address of Assessed Parcel C
Property Identification Number:
(12 d iit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight? C C f✓
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form
must be completed and f with the city clerk no later than the
close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the city council consider (check one):
a. (_) Deferral of assessment
b. (� Senior Citizen deferment (over 55 years of age)
C* ( Cancellation of assessment
Revision of assessment
ason for the request:
ILI 47
tan
. Print Name) (Signature) (Date)
awl
ddress bf P' perty Owner) Telephone
ZipS�;�rr9
Au 24, 1992
,Maplewood City Council
County Road B
y1aplewood, MN 55119
RE: Watershed project at Hi and McK"ni Road
% am os homeowner at 980 S MrNmiq,ht Road. I have a concern
with the current watershed project in cmr area that requires
your considerations Please give the following facts your
attention regarding my interests in this matters
My property is being assessed for sewer sanitation hook- up
within the next year due to the -fact that the storm sewer
project has encompassed a sanitation plan. The practi-
callity of installing this system doe"s not elude me; what
does give me a problem is the fact that T should be mandated
to hook up at this time. My property is ten years old. The
septic systems are in excellent condition and up to code.
The leeching fields are built on a sand base and will not
. present a problem to the environment. Further the property
is at least 2"5 acres, and the distance from the hook-ur-1 to '
the entry to the dwelling is at least 175 feet.
At this time % am requestinEl a variance from the esewer
san1tation hook-up. In addition, that this property not be
assessed until such a time as it would be necessary to
convert to the sewer sanitation system.
I will be attending the assessment meeting scheduled for
Au�ust 24, 1992.
Yours truly
Sharon Lillmars Lamb
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPS FORM
PROJECT NO.90 -10, XCKNIGHT /HIGHWOOD
Address of Assessed Parcel /0, ,&X:2Z/6kr
Property Identification Number:
(12 i number)- 0 Q 13
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
is No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form
must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the
close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the city council consider (check one):
a. (_) Deferral of assessment
b. (_j Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
CIO (_) Cancellation of assessment
d. (�) Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
10A41 PtVRFgry 0 4 1 VL? /S 0 i su1T�Qcf
'F�� �u� o�Y�,o�,✓� . 7�/F �oU�E /S toc.���D Rp�oX 4� fT.
� Q n ,�� � "T;46 S30 I Vie, PZ0) �i N�' RN 1� 'S'D fT 3 oc/ ��f
- Y of r�14� .vat P ay Li�✓�". tom' ���E SEEN %S�ESS�I> For..
1� � � 1006166C PeWCZ<,Ad . AlOWeverl- OiVLY yo)NF s4iviTAd
Aeg A o fivSTA& 6.0 V2 L6 4 A c
�Ekr Nc�s��Ns �
aAov19
(Print Name) ( (Date)
10w h r-kwaT09 -a . �� 16� ?3� -73s3"
(Addi�aas Property Owner) Telephone
�,.anct 4`00i2 nom• zip s5t
J
k�
ao
_1
/0
C- J/,OL
-r
te �re�lo�u -0000' w? , � - y� 7G
7d_py yry k A75a�_
fs. L."y— 40�Ll /?-C/
�/J, _ _051r'�o-✓6_ dT� T� --
X-f,
54/
54
C.
tio
Ao*
100�
e� .. Ap^'v'�i' Yw� �d !'Trc mod 461,w—&-7 i! ..v 7. T�e�.�7�
i --
•
49
-0
- - ... !✓.e r�.n -s-� oar _'?' __�D _G.e 7h 4 � _.. _-
hco� � r.rl� -ice y�-o- `'`�� ��i __..
. Wo�..� -� /J�w ,�/'7 'ham � w�T��y
*1 40
4%
.1
4rootw000f
Colo.
48
•
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
PROJECT N0990 -10, McIQNIGHT /HIGHWOOD
Address of Assessed Parcel_.. � O t7 D So,. jMc Ktj i U 1,1
Property Identification Number:
4w 4w
(12 digit number)
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
es No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form
must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the
close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the city council consider (check one):
a. (_) Deferral of assessment
b. (_j Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
CIO (_) Cancellation of assessment
d. (� Revision of assessment
Reason for the request: ,
WQS'
05 5PCs
a ct S t eas S tueAa
�t.l ds SITS 1V� 'TIC �'VLt C Q
t6q VxVIE
lei
US n o`f n
e ilvua t��A,t � bv� (cQ a�� nom/ Icy
(Print Name) (signature) 1 4 Date)
90
2 7 +731 -3113
(Address of Property Owner) Telephone
�+1 Ft I r i r- weo c� t zip 9
�7 ATt a � .
k'
r;
ti
Ei
t�
r
r,
`
o
Richard Neil Bolinger
1070 South Mcknigh* Rd.
�
Maplewood,, Mn. 55119
City of MapIewcovJ
Department of public Works
1830 E. County Road B
Mapl.ewood, Mri. 55 109
Rec PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS
Project 90-10 Storm Drainage Improvements
and Sanitary Sewer Cons-itruction beyond ,
the Roos Home at 1050 So. McknightV '
Dear Sirs;
When 1 received my assessment letter (JD #13-28-32-0020) a few days
ago I was quite upset. The sum of $8 for c Iot shouId
�I�rm
anyone �s it �s double vlhat my neighbors assessment were.
My lot is approximately 164 feet wide" However, my house is 7' feet
lon� and sits right i� the middIe o� the lot. There is s�i�htIy ove�r
40 feet to my lot line on either side of my house~ As you can �ee
±here is no possibility of ever building another house on this
property. The sum of $4,025.00 is lofty but compatible with whai; the
neigh�ors �re� r��eiving. I am con Fident that the citv wiIl be
e tab1e to me on this issue.
The issue of ex±�nding the sanitary sewer south on M�Kni�ht to
Mprela nd ca t the entire neig�borhood by Surprise. After we go back
and ask tor oertain do�umen±s from the city it a tha� ther� was
di SE, Cussion of the idea but certainly not communicated to the pubIio
sufficiently. Even one of your staffers stated that the sanitary
eewer project wa� a quick decision rilade with very little chance for
publi comment. It is ironic that ���om people who would be assessed
for the sanitary sewer were all surprised when they received a letter
dated June 18,1992, showing am map of the proposed sanitary Sewer and
told that the project would start, within e week.
S*eve~al of us attended some of the hearings on this project bu� may�e
not aIl of them. Had the full intent of the sanitary sewer proje
been visible, each one of us would have been heard loudIy. Our septic
systems are 3-6 years old and working well in very sandy soil. We
feel that we were never adequately informed of the inte of the city
onthis project. We need ass.urance that the citizent:� of our
nei�hborhoods �re �iver/ enough f�cts to ir/form them weII in advan��~
SinoereIy,
Richard N. Bolinger '
CC. The Mayors OffiCe
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
PROJECT H0.90 -10 McKNIGHT /HIGHWOOD
Address of Assessed Parcel 1 �q (� M r. k,.xo Q q�J •J
Property Identification Number:
15 � � U
(12 number) Q
Do you wish to address the city council tonight?
Yes No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the city
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form
must be completed and filed with the city clerk no later than the
close of tonight's city council assessment hearing. Your request
will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the city council consider (check one):
a. Deferral of assessment
b. (_j Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
CIO {_) Cancellation of assessment
d. (_) Revision of assessment
Reason for the request: _
r`
i_ \V.,
ta il
(Print Name) isigniture) ate
0 nr 5 � l Z- �? R'S4LL2
(Address of Pr pertr Owner) Telephone
0 2ip ���.��
i - Loen Cr-1
A 1'c
MEMORANDUM
Action by Counc11.1
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development E -
SUBJECT: Metro 2015 Report Modifie - -=
DATE: August 27, 1992 _ - --
R e jeCte d
Date
The Metropolitan Council is requesting comments on their Metro
2015 report. I have prepared a letter based on comments from the
Planning Commission. The deadline for a reply is September 16.
I have also included a newspaper article on St. Paul's comments.
RECOMMENDATION
Review the attached report and add any comments to the attached
letter. Authorize staff to send the letter to the Metropolitan
Council.
gob- 3:met2015.mem (3.2)
attachments:
1. Letter
2. Metro 2015 Report
3. Newspaper Article
CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
612 - 770 -4560
August 17, 1992
Mary E. Anderson, Chair
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre
2.30 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1634
METRO 2015 REPORT
Thank -you for sending us a copy of the Metro 2015 report. I
presented the report to the Maplewood Planning Commission and
City Council. The City had the following comments:
16 In the face of limited resources, how and who will
prioritize regional goals? The Metro 2015 document does not
address this issue.
20 The report lists many lofty goals. Can we afford this
vision? A more realistic vision may be to maintain the
current service levels. The metro region has high tax
rates. New services may be difficult to finance by raising
taxes. The tax base may even decline by 2015. The present
high tax rates may encourage tax payers to leave the State.
Generous welfare payments encourage people with low incomes
to move here from other states. The result may be less tax
base in 2015 than we have now.
3. The report does not address a vision for the region's size.
Will the size of the region expand from the current seven -
county region?
4. In the past, there has been an emphasis on solving traffic
problems by building more roads and widening existing roads.
The Metropolitan Council is considering whether to add a
lane to I -35W or build an LRT system. The Council's
decision on I -35W will set a precedent for how the region's
transportation system will look in the future. An LRT
system may not be feasible because of the region's low
Equal Opportunity Employer
density of development.
5. The report does not address consolidation of services.
GEOFF OLSON, AICP - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
go \met2015.1et (3,,2)
r
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 -1634
July 15, 1992
TO: Metro Area City Key Contact Persons
612 291 -6359 FAX 612 291 -6550 TTY 612 291 -0904
The Metropolitan Council is developing. a "vision" for the Twin Cities Metro Area in the year 2015.
A► cove of our draft vislnn_ titled M- eft 2015 - -V lion and rro—a , C en�leceA J. 'ft
As the region's long - range planning agency, the Council believes that we don't have to just let the
future happen to us. We can help shape our future by setting goals and then making public decisions
that take us toward them.
The draft includes goals for six forces that will help shape the region: econonucs, governance,
transportation, telecommunications, education, and quality of life. Strategies to implement the goals
will be developed later.
The Council wants to be sure that these goals reflect the ideas and aspirations of people who live in
this .region and do business here. We are seeking broad community input this summer.
We wanted to alert you that we are working with the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to
gain city government perspectives on future goals for the region. However, if your city would like
to participate more directly, we would be glad to send someone to present our proposed goals and
discuss them with you is August
We also invite you to speak at a town meeting on Wednesday, Sept. 2, that we are holding to hear
comments from community groups on our proposed goals. The meeting, from 7 to 9 p em9 9 will in
held at the Council offices in downtown. St. Paul. It also will be aired live on Channel 6, the Metro
VKViV 1�r:rtVasl.
Please call us if you'd like more information about this project Donna Mattson, at 291 =6493, or Ken
Reddick, at 291 -6422, will be glad to help you.
SWergly,
Mary 8 derson
Chair
Enc.
Metro 2015
V ision and Goals
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 291 -6359 TDD 291 -0904
• Publication No. 640 -92 -0768
• June 26, 1992
Printed on Recycled Paper
Introduction
This document is past of an effort by the Metropolitan Council to develop a "vision" or picture of
what the Twin Cities Region should be in the year 2015.
Why a Vision?
• In its first 25 years, the Council has looked ahead to plan solutions for important problems
facing the region. Now it is looking ahead to the next 25 years. What does this region want
to be, to look like and to offer its citizens in 2015? The Council is responsible for making
long -range plans today to help ensure the region's health and vitality in the 21st century.
Setting goals for the region is a first step.
• As the Council begins to update its keystone regional plan, the Metropolitan Development and
Investment Framework, it needs to examine the problems and opportunities the region will
face over the next two decades. The policies in the framework will help guide our growth and
development, but we need to know where we want to be in 2015 - -we need a vision.
• The Council is specifically charged by statute to prepare goals and plans for the orderly and
economic development of the region. In addition, the Council is being challenged and
encouraged to provide leadership in long - range planning for the region. Creating a vision can
help in that effort.
Cornerstone Ideas
At the beginning of this effort, the Council set a basic assumption in establishing a vision:
To achieve the highest quality living in a community setting with the flexibility to accommodate the
changing population and compete in a world economy. To pursue the region's future with a
sensitivity and respect for our environment in our development and redevelopment practices.
The Council decided, after hearing from several nationally recognized strategic thinkers, that
there are really a handful of forces or factors driving the decisions needed to make this region
successful in the 21st century. Six major factors or categories emerged:
• Economics
• Governance
• Transportation
• Telecommunications
• Education
• Quality of life
Goals as a Starting Point
The goals developed in the six categories describe where we want to be, rather than ways to get
there. At a later stage, it will be necessary to identify strategies to accomplish the goals and the
appropriate actors to implement them. Before that, however, the Council wants to share this
vision with the regional community to see if the goals are on target -- whether these are the right
goals the region should be pursuing. The goals are intended to spark awide- ranging community
discussion about where this region is going in the next quarter century.
Some kind of :measures are needed to determine whether the region is meeting its goals. This
document includes examples of possible measures for each of the six categories of goals. Like the
goals, they are only a starting point for discussion.
The Process
The goals were drafted by small discussion groups made up of Council members, staff and
members of the Council's Minority Issues Advisory Committee. The P
rou s benefitted from ideas
g
of national and local experts who spoke to them, including educators, economists, academicians,
planners, representatives of the telecommunications industry and others.
Over the next two months, the Council will be asking for ideas and comments on these goals.
Many organizations and individuals will be participating. The Council is making special effort to
g P
discuss the goals with some of the young people who will be adults when the year 2015 arrives.
The Council will then revise the goals based on what it heard in the public dialogue. After a set
of goals is adopted by the Council, the Council will move forward to develop strategies to
. . p g
accomplish the vision.
2
A Vision
It's now the year 2015. The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area has achieved the goals proposed by
the Metro Council a quarter century ago. What kind of a region do we live in?
Key Themes
We've become more adaptive and proactive in shaping change. We have found that in the school
of change, the lesson is never over. We have developed our economy, our educational system
and our governmental functions to meet changing demands and expectations.
We've sought technological advances that are crucial to the region's economy and quality of life.
We used technology as a tool to achieve our goals - -for example, in transportation,
telecommunications, education and business.
We've opened the doors wider to opportunities and resources. All residents have better access to
jobs, governmental decision- making, education, recreational opportunities, health care, housing
and information resources.
We've gained spin -off benefits from the decisions we've made. For example, our
telecommunication system has bolstered the economy while giving telecommuters an alternative to
traffic congestion and enriching learning opportunities. Our education system has equipped
students with basic academic, social and personal skills to earn a living and function well as
citizens, workers and parents. And it has helped young people shape their hopes and P otential.
We have successfully resolved important but competing priorities. For example, we have grown
economically, but we have preserved and improved our natural environment. We have a larger
population that is more diverse, but we have strengthened our sense of community. Government
has finally learned to do more with less.
A Closer Look
Looking more closely, we see a region that is a strong, well- established player in the global
marketplace. We realized many years ago that metropolitan areas, not nations, would be the key
economic competitors in the international playing field.
We realized we had to be more organized in the way we bolstered the region's economy. Our
young people are achieving their full potential in school; our regional quality of life has attracted
talented people and dollar investments; and we've adequately invested in our essential
infrastructure to support economic activity and the basic needs of our urban society. The result
has been an improved regional standard of living, supported by substantial fob growth and a
diverse economy. Greater Minnesota has prospered from spin -off companies and jobs located in
the region.
Communities in the region have willingly cooperated in seeking business, jobs and revenues based
on regional interests rather than the interests of individual communities. This cooperation
enables the region to compete as one economic unit in national and international markets.
3
We've made the region a leader in the use of technological advances in transportation and
telecommunications, which support both our economy and quality of life. Our
telecommunications system uses leading -edge technology to link our voices, video images and data
with destinations within the region, and around the state, nation and the globe.
Telecommunications is now considered as essential an infrastructure as transportation, sewers and
education.
The region leads in using technological advances in transportation like "intelligent" vehicle and
highway systems. At the same time, we've made better use of the facilities we have b managing
Y g g
travel demand and charging users a variety of transportation "prices," like congestion fees and
parking surcharges. Our transit system, now very consumer - oriented, has more passengers each
year. Our major airport is an international.hub, with direct flights to cities around the countr
and the world.
Government at all levels has become more innovative and cost - efficient in delivering services and
solving problems. Government roles are clearly defined so that services are delivered at the most
effective and efficient level. People have responded with renewed interest in governmental affairs
and higher voting rates show it. People feel a stronger sense of belonging to their communities
within the region, and they participate and feel comfortable in their community. At the same
time,. people feel that they belong to one metropolitan region. They think about and work for
the Metro Area.
We still have a strong environmental awareness. But we think less now about mitigating negative
g g g
effects on the environment, and more about designing urban development and its support
facilities with nature and people in mind. Our air and water are cleaner; our waste is less toxic
and we're producing less of it per capita. We can J swim and fish in our three major rivers and in
our, lakes that have the greatest potential for recreation or water supply.
The region has an abundance of accessible recreation, cultural and information opportunities.
Health care is accessible to everyone who needs it, but most people take responsibility for
. . P Y
pursuing a healthful lifestyle. Families of all types get the support they need to care for their
family members, including children and elderly. The percentage of all residents livin g poverty
over tY
has declined.
Housing is affordable for more of the region's residents, and it is designed to suit people at
various stages of their lives and people with special needs. More employment opportunities are
located near affordable housing and more affordable housing near new jobs. Our aging
neighborhoods have been rehabilitated and a sense of community strengthened there. Our streets
are safer and crime rates lower.
We've planned the region's growth into a pattern that has reduced traffic congestion, the cost of
public services, energy consumption, air pollution, and more of the negative effects on the
environment. Urban design concepts have helped create a sense of place, with open spaces,
natural features, public buildings and transportation facilities.
We have come a long way in 25 years. We're already looking ahead to the next quarter century.
4
Goals
The Regional Economy
For many years the region has been a good place to live, work and establish businesses. Its
economy has experienced steady employment growth of 2.7 percent annually and relatively low
unemployment rates (4.5 percent in 1991)- -well below Minnesota and U.S. rates of 5.1 percent
and 6.7 percent, respectively. Manufacturing industries gained some jobs, while service industries
gained the most. The region is home to 15 firms on the Fortune 500 list of industrial firms. Its
poverty rate (8.1 percent) is well below the national average (13.1 percent). In per capita
personal income, the region ranked sixth among the 25 largest metro areas in 1989 (8 percent
higher than the average of the 25 metro areas and 15 percent higher than the U.S. average).
This success has largely been credited to the region's skilled labor force and to our diverse
economy. But in recent years a number of clouds have appeared on the economic horizon.
There are questions about how well we are educating our labor force; the computer industry n
i ry
the region s In decline; some mayor businesses are no longer under family or local control; the
Minnesota business climate has been soundly criticized by the private sector; global competition is
increasing and world markets are changing. In addition, there are concerns about the problem of
low income burdening a significant number of people, inadequate productivity growth, our abilit
to maintain competitive advantages in computers and medical equipment, and the demand for
government services versus the willingness to pay for those services.
Looking to the year 2015 raises a major question: Is the region prepared to compete and thrive in
this changing environment? For example, no longer is the region's business competition the other
cities in the U.S.; it is other cities around the world. Can we afford to sit back and let "the
market" respond to these and other changes, or are there some roles government can or should
play to keep this region competitive in the emerging world markets? What roles should the
business community play? Are there opportunities for public/private cooperation? Before these
questions can be answered, it is important to have a vision of what we want the regional economy
to look like. Below are goals that can help shape that vision for the 2015 economy.
Goals
1. The region is recognized as a major player in the global economy, based on the following:
The region has a highly educated workforce with skills important to the regional economy,
and with the ability to learn new skills as the economy changes in response to the national
and international economies. These would include a wide range of skills - -for example, in
design and manufacturing as well as in management and finance.
The region has a quality of life that attracts and keeps both businesses and a highly skilled
and adaptable workforce.
Infrastructure developed by regional and local governments and by the private sector supports
regional economic activity and encourages job growth that meets the needs of the population.
Infrastructure financing- -using cooperative arrangements, where possible -- reflects the full costs
of facilities through their life cycle -- including costs of capital, operation, maintenance and
replacement.
5
2. The region's economy experiences steady growth in the gross regional product per capita
g g P P P
(increasing the regional standard of living), based on the following:
Job growth provides employment at liveable wages for all residents, raisin g low and middle per
capita income levels.
The region's economy is diverse and flexible in terms of using regional strengths and resources
(labor market, investment capital, infrastructure, natural resources, etc.) to adapt to changing
P g g
regional and world markets and to attract and retain industries serving those markets.
3. Communities in the region are more willing to cooperate in seeking business, jobs and
revenues based on regional interests rather than on the interests of individual communities.
u
q
Such cooperation -- assisted by a more equitable tax structure, a more a itable provision of
needed services and more appropriate use of public investments in private s undertakin s -hel
g P
enable the region to compete as one economic unit in national and international markets.
4. The region has more corporate headquarters of large public and private firms.
Banks, insurance companies, venture capital companies and other sources of investment
capital in the region provide adequate funds to invest in start -up and expansion of local firms
and to nurture entrepreneurial efforts.
5. The tax burden of the region's residents and businesses ranks lower than in 1992 as compared
to other metropolitan areas.
Examples of Possible Measures
Unemployment rate compared to other urban areas
Per capita personal income in region compared to other urban areas (per capita gross regional
product compared to other urban areas)
Percent of population below the poverty level compared to other urban areas (percent of
population above 150 percent of poverty rate)
Employment growth- rate compared with previous years and comparable regions (employment
growth rate in specific industries)
Mix of industries in region compared to mix in the nation (diversity)
Composite measures of tax burden on individuals (rankings) and on businesses (rankings)
Governance
Government in the early 1990s has fallen on hard times. Regional and local government has
experienced declining federal support; political leadership has been criticized or challenged; and
many citizens feel a strong disaffection from government, becoming active mainly when their.. self -
interest is threatened.
The challenge to government is to bring new people into the process both as participants and in
leadership positions, particularly minorities and women whose participation in the past had been
limited; to develop a renewed sense of confidence in government's ability to solve problems b
allowing decision - making at the neighborhood or community levels where innovation and
flexibility can be encouraged; to act decisively and in the broader regional interest at the regional
g g
level for those problems that need a central focus. A renewed emphasis on governance -- acting
collectively to solve problems - -is essential.
People and governmental units need to think of themselves as being part of one region. The
region cannot be a collection of cities all competing against one another. The region now
competes with the world.
In governance, there is often a need to balance competing priorities- -for example, the desire for
government to be "close to the people," on one hand, and, on the other, expectations for
government services to be efficient and economical, often requiring centralization. The Metro
Council also has a vision for its own role in governance. It includes strong leadership on regional
.. . p g
issues, bolstered by additional authority to decide how state funds are spent in the Metropolitan
Area for public infrastructure and to determine where and when public subsidies will be used for
facilities of region -wide importance.
Goals
1. All segments of the public have opportunities to participate in decisions that affect their lives
and the future of their communities. Citizen decision - making takes place at the neighborhood
and community level, whenever possible. Citizen decision - making is also fostered in our larger
governmental units.
2. People have confidence in their elected and appointed government officials. The region has a
high level of political participation (such as voting and the number of persons running for
office). Participants and leaders are more representative of the diversity of the region.
3. Government roles and responsibilities are appropriately and clearly defined, including roles
involving education, so that regional and local policyma delivery king and service delive occur at the
.
most effective and efficient level, and gaps in services are closed.
4. Governmental units achieve the results people want by redesigning the service delivery system
and using other innovative approaches, public or private, to deliver public services.
S. The Metropolitan Council is the region's leader for policy planning, which provides direction,
integration and coordination of regional services. The Council decides how federal and state
funds allocated to the Metropolitan Area for public infrastructure will be spent. It decides on
major direct and indirect public investments that support facilities of region -wide importance
located within the Metropolitan Area.
7
Examples of Possible Measures
Opinion poll measures on people's confidence in local government
Voter participation rates
Number of service redesign projects completed
Level of Metro Council participation in public decisions regarding facilities of region-wide
importance sited in the region
0
Transportation
The transportation problems the region faces today and in the future stem from our need and
desire for personal mobility. Our life style involves pursuing many activities in many locations.
And to meet those needs, the automobile -- specifically the automobile with a sole occupant- -has
been the mode of choice for the vast majority of people.
However, using our cars as vehicles to carry just one person has been a major factor in causing
our transportation problems. For example, it -is primarily responsible for the growing problem of
congestion during peak travel periods. Between 1972 and 1984, the number of severely congested
freeway miles rose from 24 to 72 miles. That total could increase to 200 miles by the year 2010,
according to estimates of the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation.
With many cars having only a solo driver, our extensive highway system has not been used
efficiently. For example, during peak periods, average auto occupancy dropped nine percent
between 1980 and 1990. At the same time, people have been traveling more. On an average
weekday, the number of trips taken per person rose by a third between 1970 and 1990.
Heavy use of the single- occupant auto is also a major factor in causing the negative environmental
effects caused by the building and operation of our transportation system. It is an expensive way
to move people. And it has promoted a spread -out land use pattern that makes it difficult to
serve many parts of our region with economical transit service.
Ridesharing and transit use, on the other hand, can increase the efficiency of the transportation
system. But bus ridership declined 24 percent from 1980 to 1990. The challenge facing the
region is to make these modes more attractive while making use of single- occupant vehicles less
attractive and convenient.
Airport capacity is another major issue. The region risks forgoing substantial economic gains if
adequate airport capacity is not available as needed in a timely fashion over the next 25 years.
Goals
1. The transportation system moves people and goods within the region and to the state, nation
and world efficiently and cost - effectively. The transportation system is developed in ways that
preserve the integrity of the environment, allow for economic growth and development, and
support other regional goals. The system also reflects the region's leadership in the use of
advanced transportation technology (for example, "intelligent" vehicle .and highway systems,
high -speed rail, hover craft) that maximizes the system's capacity and efficiency.
2. The regional transportation system balances demand and capacity so that resources are used
most efficiently and the environment is least affected. This is achieved by managing how
existing facilities are used- -for example by reducing use of single- occupant vehicles, changing
the time that people make trips, reducing the frequency of trips and changing trip
destinations. The system also balances local, state and national mobility needs.
3. Transit is the preferred choice over the single - occupant automobile for many more people.
An adequately funded and improved transit system makes regular - route transit, paratransit
and ridesharing more attractive for all users. With improved safety, comfort and convenience
9
of riders and drivers, the transit system increases the people- carrying capacity of the
transportation system as much as possible, serves the needs of transit - dependent people,
supplements the metropolitan highway system, maintains and enhances the economic vitality
of the central cities and allows for intensified development in other economic centers.
Land development and redevelopment create an environment that promotes and encourages
increased use of all forms of transit.
4. The efficiency of the transportation system is improved, and use of the system reflects the
environmental, social and financial costs to society. For example, the region is a national
leader in using a variety of transportation pricing, including "congestion pricing," "peak- period
pricing," parking surcharges and single - occupant vehicle taxes.
5. The region has an air transportation system with the capability to meet the demand from
businesses and people in Minnesota and the Upper Midwest for air connections to the nation
and the world.
The region's major airport enjoys the presence of "home base" commercial airline facilities,
international hubbing and a competitive airline market, with a the sizable presence of several
national commercial airlines. Direct passenger and air freight services are available to the
world's major cities.
The region's major airport, and its satellite airports, provide convenient and safe air travel,
and cause the least amount of disruption to the environment.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Miles of congested freeways
Vehicle occupancy
Transit ridership
Air quality measures
Application of "intelligent" vehicle technology in transit service
Airline takeoffs and landings
Number of international airline flights from Twin Cities Area
Number of nonstop airline flights
10
Telecommunications
Telecommunications - -and access to it - -will become increasingly vital to the fundamental economic
health of the Twin Cities Region in the years ahead. That's a lesson histo ry can teach us.
This .region grew to national economic prominence because the railroads, then the highways, then
today's het airplanes gave the regions businesses good connections to the national market. These
facilities gave the region a way to overcome its remote inland location to sell and ship its ideas
and products to the nation, and more recently, to the world. Now, telecommunications is
increasingly being viewed as the next key infrastructure, as important to the region as the
railroads and highways were in the region's economic history. The region's businesses need the
same access - -or better - -to advanced telecommunications as businesses in other regions enjoy in
order to compete in a world marketplace.
In addition, the region needs modern, high- capacity telecommunications services because people
need access to information and because telecommunications offers seemingly boundless
opportunities for people to learn, earn a living and enjoy a higher quality of life. Unequal
opportunities, experts argue, will lead to a society of "information rich" and "information poor."
Telecommunications could help solve other problems. It could aid in solving central city problems,
where, for example, the presence of advanced telecommunications facilities could help offset the
disadvantage of high redevelopment costs. Telecommuting could also reduce peak - period travel
or travel in congested corridors.
However, private providers of advanced telecommunications capabilities have not upgraded their
equipment here as rapidly as they have in other regions. High - capacity fiber optic transmission
lines are not available throughout the region. If the transmission of voice, data and video
experiences a boom as some predict, the existing infrastructure may not be adequate to do the
job.
By and large, governmental units in the region have their own networks to move data or
communicate with their police and fire departments. Telecommunications - -and facility- sharing--
may give them away to provide more effective services more efficiently. But there is no
coordinated approach, or public sector planning, in telecommunications. Each unit of government
has made its own arrangements with telecommunications vendors to get its needs met.
Goals
1. The region has "leading- edge" telecommunications services readily available to all businesses
and homes.
High- capacity telecommunication transmission facilities and networks move information within
the region and state, and to national and worldwide destinations.
The region's telecommunications infrastructure gives businesses a competitive advantage in
producing and selling products and services to the nation and the world.
11
2. Telecommunications infrastructure is considered as fundAmental to the effective functioning of
the region as are roads and sewers.
The region uses telecommunications technology to its fullest extent to provide cost - efficient
access to information and services for all its residents. The region uses telecommunications as
a tool to 'implement regional policies.
Government agencies throughout the region use telecommunications technology to improve
the quality, effectiveness and coordination of their services.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison with previous years)
Miles of fiber optic cable in place
Region's telecommunications ranking nationally and internationally
Public- access points to data and information
Use of telecommunications in development and redevelopment activities
Percent of population that is "computer literate."
Percent of ' population with access to a personal computer
12
Education
Observers of the K- through -12 education system- -from education, business and government- -have
said that our schools are a little better than the rest of the nation's - -but not good enough for our
future. They offer some criticisms; I
Schools aren't focused on helping students learn; they are organized and run for adults, not
students.
• Expectations are low and there are not many incentives for students or teachers to do well.
• Athletic achievement and "having things" are valued, but academic achievement is not.
• The region's high school graduation rate is high (at 91 percent), it may be because the
standards are low. For example, Minnesota is one of only eight states that require less than
175 instructional days per year; 90 percent of Minnesota high school students are allowed to
spend as little as five hours in class; and only 13 percent attend districts that have established
formal homework policies.
• The education system has a dismal record of meeting the educational needs of our growing
racial and ethnic minority populations. For example, 30 percent of the 6,000 -plus students in
the seven - county region who dropped out of school in 1991 were from racial or ethnic
minority groups. By contrast, minorities make up only 16 percent of the total student
population in the region.
• School boards have been criticized for focusing on financial and administrative matters at the
expense of students. School boards have also been called monopoly systems with exclusive
franchises that are reluctant to allow others to create schools.
In addition, businesses find an increasing number of high school graduates ill- equipped to perform
work that requires even basic language and math skills. But, at most, one -third of Minnesota's
high school districts have established minimum standards for graduates' readin g and mathematics
skills. Approximately 555,000 Minnesotans between the ages of 18 and 64 are unable to read,
write, compute, problem -solve or cope with changing conditions sufficiently well to meet the
requirements of adult life in our society. If this region is to compete with the world, high school
students must be better trained.
Can average, Minnesota spends more for education than most states (17 percent more per capita),
and has increased its financial commitment steadily over the past 20 years. In 1992 -93 Minnesota
will spend 30 percent of its $15.4 billion budget on elementary and secondary school education.
But recognized measures show that performance has in fact declined. While Minnesota still ranks
high in American College Test scores, the results have been dropping more than the national
average. Scholastic Aptitude Test and Advance Placement scores have continued to steadily
decline. The Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores have actually dipped below the national
average. The question arises: What kind of education are our young people getting for the
money we spend?
13
Goals
1. Education is valued and supported. The regional community places a high value on educating
its children and youth. It is a top priority to provide financial and other resources so that
students can develop the capabilities they need to reach their full potential
2. Education is focused on students, and helping them learn is the highest priority of education.
Students are interested in learning and know how to learn- -they can use information, solve
problems and work in teams. Being "educated" means being equipped with the academic,
social and personal skills to earn a living and function well as a citizen, worker and parent in a
rapidly changing society.
The community sets high expectations for students. It stresses students' efforts and honors
their academic achievements. Students understand the community's expectations and know
they have to demonstrate mastery of specific skills in order to graduate.
3. The community encourages innovation and excellence in teaching that improves the way
students learn. It supports and rewards these efforts. Schools and teachers are rewarded
based primarily on results.
The teaching profession is sought after by people who have a passion for teaching and
learning. People with diverse backgrounds obtain certification using heir education, practical
g p
and professional experiences. The profession attracts and retains the best educators.
4. The governance of public education is broadly based, involving parents, students, educators
and many others in the community.
5. A restructured school system that provides learning opportunities from early childhood on has
replaced the conventional K -12 public school structure of the 20th century. Parents and
students choose among a broad range of school organizations, settings and schedules..
Students progress based on demonstrated competency of the material. Often, they are
grouped across ages to learn from each other. Much of their learning takes place in the
community at business, government and other sites. Learning is enhanced by extensive use of
technology.
6. The entire community - -in a cooperative, coordinated effort--joins teachers in working to
nurture., support and applaud students in their educational efforts. It provides a safe, healthy
environment that promotes learning. Parents are actively involved in their children's
education and create a home environment that encourages learning. Schools are "communit
centers where citizens interact with students to help them learn. Businesses, civic
organizations, social- service agencies, and secular and religious organizations provide learning
opportunities and recognize academic achievement.
7. Cultural differences are celebrated and shared. Students learn about and respect the
practices, beliefs and historical contributions of different cultures. In order to share more
fully in the global society, students can speak languages of the world in addition to English.
14
8. Higher education in the region is available to all students based on ability to learn and choice,
rather than on ability to pay.
The region's higher education institutions foster research and development as part of their
mission to educate students and generate discoveries of new knowledge.
9. People assume that they will continue to learn throughout their lives. The community
provides affordable educational opportunities that are flexible enough to meet the people's
g p p
needs for job training, citizenship and other learning in a rapidly changing world.
10. The region's educational system produces a highly - skilled and motivated work force that fuels
our businesses' efforts to grow and compete in the . lobal economy.
Y
Examples of Possible Measures-
School readiness - -an indicator that the student has the health, nutrition, developmental skills and
family support necessary for success in school, compared over time
Average state score on school achievement tests as a ratio to the national average, or, as an
alternative, the proposed competency- based graduation requirement of the Minnesota State
Board of Education (1992)
Schools with drop -out rates over 10 percent " "dro -out is defined as a student absent from school
( p of
for a 12 month period, a definition used nationally)
Percentage of high- school graduates who are pursuing advanced education or training ne
g year
Y
after high- school, compared over time
Percentage of recent high - school graduates rated average or better in work skills by their
employers, compared over time
15
Quality of Life
Quality of life is made up of all the things we expect, that we value, and are committed to
maintain through payments of time, energy or money. Quality of life is all the reasons people like
to live in the Twin Cities Area -- personal well - being, living conditions, opportunities to be part of
a community, work life, physical surroundings and leisure time activities. Quality of life is all the
things that we would miss if they were gone, the things that make this region special and "better"
than many other areas.
Many people believe that the region has a high quality of life, that there are many unique and
good things here. All citizens do not necessarily share those feelings, especially those who believe
that they do not have equal access to opportunities in the community.
There is danger in assuming that everyone participates in a high quality of life. And we risk
complacency if we do not recognize and preserve the quality of life that we have, even as we seek
ways to improve it. We need to be aware that focusing on the long -term quality of life may also
mean forgoing some short -term gains, or even sacrifices, for some long -term efforts.
The dimensions of our quality of life are diverse and growing more so, and will change over time.
We need to be flexible to respond to changes desired by future generations.
A. INDIVIDUAL WELL- BEING, THE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY
A decent, affordable place to live and the safety and security of person and property are basic
needs that must be met before many other quality -of -life aspects can be considered. As important
as they are, however, our region has a ways to go toward meeting those needs. The crime rate,
for example, has continued to go up. Between 1980 and 1989, incidents of reported violent .crime
went up 42 percent in Minneapolis and 22 percent in St. Paul. The lack of affordable housing
continues to plague the region despite decades of efforts to deal with the problem. In 1990, for
example, 40 percent of all renter households in the region (113,000 people) paid more than 30
percent of their income for rent, a standard measure of housing affordability. And nearly one -
fourth of renter households had annual incomes below $10,000.
Another essential ingredient of individual well - being is access to a basic level of goods and
services, especially health care. Access to health care, however, remains a problem. In 1988, six
percent of the population was not covered by health insurance for all or part of the year.
Moreover, the infant mortality rate - -often linked to a lack of prenatal care- -has increased for
.people of ethnic and racial minorities. In 1985, for example, the infant mortality rate for African
Americans was 16.38 per 1,000 live births; in 1988 it jumped to 20.46. For Asian Americans, the
rate rose from 5.65 in 1985 to 8.54 in 1988.
Parents should be able to expect that they can raise their children in the best possible
environment and that they and their family will not be trapped in poverty or hindered by
discrimination. But in 1990, 11 percent of all children in the region lived in poverty; and 36
percent of families headed by women had incomes below the poverty level, an increase from 30
percent in 1980. For people of racial and ethnic minorities, the percent living in poverty was
much higher: 37 percent of African Americans, 41 percent of American Indians, 32 percent of
Asian Americans, 19 percent of persons of Hispanic origin and 24 percent of other races. We
must provide opportunities to people for education and work that enable them to earn a living
and provide for their basic needs.
16
As these and other issues are addressed, the region needs to foster a sense in its people that they
have a personal stake in their local communities and in other communities in the region. The
. g
weaknesses of some communities can affect the future of others. People who have the means
should be willing to give of their time and money to make the region a better lace to live --
. p
viable, progressive and constantly striving for improvement. This spirit of contributing and caring
has been strong here and is an essential ingredient for building a better area in the future.
Goals
1. The region has a comprehensive, cost - effective system to deliver high- quality health care and
related services with choices in treatment alternatives for physical and mental illnesses. All
the region's residents have access to health care services. The region has a highly rated
g Y
emergency response system.
The region's health care system emphasizes preventing health problems and promoting health
and wellness. The region has improved the health status of its residents based on a wide
range of indicators- -for example, reduced deaths and injuries of children from family buse
y
and neglect, a reduced death rate from cardiovascular disease, increased levels of physical
activity of the population, and increased immunization for infections diseases.
2. All residents of the region feel safe and secure in their homes, neighborhoods streets,
sidewalks, schools and parks. They have confidence that ublic safety personnel will respond
p YP p
quickly and appropriately, regardless of where they live or their minority or economic status.
The region's ranking compared to the rates of violent and property crimes in other
metropolitan areas, both in the central cities and suburbs, are lower than the region's rank in
. g
population size. Sales and use of illegal drugs have substantially decreased.
3. All types of family structures are supported so parents can carry out their responsibilities and
their children can develop into adults who take responsibility for themselves and their
community. Elderly and disabled people have every opportunity to live independently as
much and as long as possible. Extended families have more support to care for their members
and do not need to rely on institutions.
4. The basic needs of all of the area's population for shelter, food, water, clothing and energy
are met. The percentage of the region's population living in poverty has decreased.
Everyone has equal opportunities for education, employment, housing, leisure or social
activities regardless of their race, color, creed, religion, national origin, ender, disability, a e
g age,
status with regard to public assistance or sexual orientation.
Cultural values and religious beliefs are recognized and celebrated.
S. Residents of the region have a sense of pride in and belonging to their community, and a
concern for its long -range future. The region continues to be an example to other
metropolitan areas for its recognition of and participation in volunteerism, corporate
leadership and contributions to nonprofit charitable and cultural organizations.
F
17
6. Housing is affordable and available for all income groups throughout the urban area of the
region. An increased percentage of households in the region own their homes.
Appropriate housing is available for persons at all stages of their lives as well as for persons
with special housing needs -- people with disabilities, children, elderly and others.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Percent of population, especially children, living below the poverty line
Number of reported cases of child abuse or neglect
Number of teen pregnancies
Infant mortality rate
Drug and alcohol- related death rate
Number of homeless people
Percent of households below the median income spending more than 30 percent of income on
housing
Ranking of region among other metro areas in health care
Rates of violent crime and domestic violence
DWI arrest and conviction rates
Rates of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS,
Percent of pretax revenue contributed by major businesses to social programs, the arts and other
activities
B. EMPLOYMENT
The region's quality of life depends upon its economic base. Its future success is dependent upon
increasing the pool *of highly skilled jobs filled by highly skilled labor, both professional and
technical. An individual's quality of life also depends on the economic base, and the ability to
qualify for, find and hold a job that can support a family. Trends in the 1980s raise serious
questions about whether it is possible to greatly expand the number of "sustainable" jobs. For
example, the biggest increase in employment during the decade was in the service and. retail
sectors (65 percent of new jobs), which pay the lowest average weekly wages.
Employment is expected to continue moving away from the central cities and into the suburbs
over the next 25 years. The Metro Council forecasts that the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul
will see little or no growth in employment between 1990 and 2020. On the other hand, suburban
job growth continues. For example, between 1980 and 1989, 67 percent of all net new jobs were
created in the region's developing suburbs. And suburban job growth will increase substantially in
the future, particularly in the southern and southwestern suburbs. The increases, if they occur,
will mean that people will be travelling to the job -rich suburbs in far greater numbers for service
and retail work. But, their incomes may not permit them to live in the higher- riced suburban
. p
housing near available fobs.
Goals
1. An increased proportion of jobs pay a wage that can support a family. Employment
opportunities, rates and wages of Metropolitan Area women and minorities are equal to those
of white males.
1 U1161
2. Employment opportunities are maintained and increased in areas with existing, affordable
housing. More affordable housing opportunities are available in areas with growing
employment.
Residents have a wide range of employment opportunities within a 30- minute commute by
public transit within the urban area.
3. Everyone has opportunities for retraining and reemployment.
Each student graduating from high school, technical or vocational colleges has the knowledge
and skills necessary to obtain an entry level job, and over the long run, to compete and
survive in the employment market.
4. Large businesses in the region have on -site child care available. Smaller employers have
cooperative child care arrangements.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Per capita income for women and racial and ethnic minorities
Ratio of workers in manufacturing to service and retail sectors
Number of persons unemployed more than 26 weeks
Percent real growth in average wages p worker
Ratio of the region's average wages per worker to the national average
Number of businesses with child care available to employees
C. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
The physical environment encompasses both the natural resources of the area -- water, air, soils,
minerals, vegetation and animal life- -and the developed landscape that consists of the facilities
and services required by a large urban population. If the Metropolitan Area of 2015 is to be a
better place to live in than it is today, there will have to be a closer relationship between the
natural and the human - built environment. Past abuses of the natural environment will need to be
corrected, and urban development will be fully integrated into the environment. New
development will put greater emphasis on good urban design and functional efficiency. The end
result will be a metropolitan area that is an attractive, well- functioning and exciting place to live
for all of its residents.
The region faces major challenges in pursuing these goals:
• We need to continue improving water quality through better wastewater treatment as our
population increases, effluent standards become more strict, and costs go up.
• The amount of pollution from "nonpoint" sources (for example, from farms and paved parking
lots) must substantially decrease. It will require changes in the personal, household and
business practices of people in the region, as well as those upstream of the region.
• We need to maintain the region's competitive advantage in water resources by managing them
wisely.
• We need to reduce the amount of waste we generate and find productive reuses for it rather
than burying it in landfills.
• We need to make better choices in the way we develop our land, to minimize the impacts on
the environment and consider the full range of physical, economic and social consequences.
19
• The region needs to develop in a manner that allows us to economically and efficientl
provide the full range of urban facilities and services.
• We need to retain the historic, central role of the downtowns of Minneapolis and St. Paul,
even as the region continues to developed outward.
• We need to increase the concentration of development in the major suburban business
centers so they can become additional hubs of activity.
• We need to arrest the physical deterioration of houses and businesses, and bring deteriorated
areas into productive use.
• We need to develop and retain a sense of place and. a local sense of distinctiveness within the
urbanized area.
Goals
1. All large tracts of land with high - quality or unique natural resource and scenic values will be
available for public use. All public waters have public access. All natural watercourses,
including wetlands, channels, floodplains and shorelands are sufficiently protected to allow
them to function naturally. The region continues to be "water rich," and with careful
management of this valuable resource, meets the multiple demands on groundwater and
surface water. The region's soil and mineral resources are carefully managed.
2. There is swimmable and fishable water quality in the region's three major rivers and some 100
lakes with major potential for recreation or for domestic water supply. Levels of non oint-
source pollution generated locally are as low as possible under existing technology and within
economic constraints. Levels of such pollution generated outside the region are substantiall
below those of 1992. Regional sanitary sewer service is of high quality, affordable, and
available when and where needed within the urban service area. All residual materials from
wastewater treatment plants are put to beneficial uses.
The region has reduced the per capita amounts and toxicity of waste generated compared with
1992 conditions. Reuse and recycling are at the highest level that is technologically achievable
and economically feasible. There is little landfilling of wastes. There are no more major
pollution sites to be cleaned up, and all previously contaminated sites have been put back into
beneficial uses.
The region attains or exceeds all federal and state ambient air quality standards.
3. The physical development pattern of the region is directed toward reducing traffic congestion,
energy consumption, air pollution and negative effects on the natural environment.
All decisions about physical development consider all the direct. and indirect impacts of
development or siting of facilities, such as noise, visual impacts, land use conflicts, traffic and
congestion, environmental disruption and consequences for the social fabric of neighborhoods.
At the same time, essential facilities for the region are accommodated.
4. The region has an urban service area with a compact, contiguous development pattern and
densities high enough to make delivering services efficient, yet balanced with open sp ace and
the natural environment. In the rural area, productive farm lands and open spaces are
preserved and development limited to be consistent with a rural level of public services.
20
The two downtowns continue to be viable commercial centers, with increased emphasis on
large- scale, unique facilities and events. Major retail and office concentrations, such as those
around regional shopping centers, are secondary focal points and hubs of activity. These areas
are more densely developed than in 1992, offer a wider variety of goods and services, contain
a mix of commercial and residential uses, and are highly accessible via the transportation
system. Community and neighborhood centers continue to provide essential goods and
services for nearby residents.
The freestanding growth centers are maintained as distinct and separate concentrations of
development.
5. Aging areas have been rehabilitated so they can continue to be viable neighborhoods. Priority
is given to maintaining the existing housing stock and making it useful for the future, instead
of demolishing and replacing it. Supporting infrastructure has been updated or renewed as
needed. Maintenance and rehabilitation have focused equally on residential as well as
commercial and industrial components so these areas can continue to rovide both housing
g
and fobs.
6. Regional and local governments make substantial use of a variety of urban design concepts in
developing and redeveloping the urban area. Open spaces and natural features, as well as the
"built" features like transportation facilities and public buildings are used to enhance the
g
environment. A "sense of place" has been created within the urban fabric through the use of
.
aesthetics and good design. Historic areas and structures are preserved when new
development and redevelopment occurs. All urban design recognizes that the region is a
winter city that functions and is attractive in all four seasons.. A healthy "urban forest" is
being maintained and expanded. .
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Land area in natural resource- related public ownership at all levels
Water quality reports of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Number of violations of pollution discharge permits
River miles that do not meet standards of being "fishable and swimmable"
Amount of wetland acres filled
Quantity of water used
Percentage of water supply systems meeting state drinking water standards
Quantity of solid waste not recycled
Quantity of hazardous wastes generated
Toxic chemicals release or transferred (millions of pounds per year)
Number of days per year that air quality standards are violated
Tons of soil lost (per acre of cropland)
Number of "Super Fund" sites identified and the number cleaned up
Number of petroleum release sites and the number cleaned up
Amount of prime agricultural land lost to development
Acres of land enrolled in Metropolitan Agricultural Preserves Program
Acres of land added to the metropolitan urban service area, defined by the Metropolitan Council
Number of jobs by location, downtowns and suburban activity concentrations
Retail sales and sales tax data
Annual issuance of building permits
Demolition permits
21
Trip generation /traffic data for highways and transit users
Transit ridership and level of transit service
Average annual energy use (average BTUs per person)
Percentage of urban tree cover
D. 'LEISURE AND ENTERTAINMENT
The leisure and entertainment opportunities available in the region are good indicators of our
high quality of life. Though not necessities - -like. shelter, a job, security or transportation, for
example -- leisure and entertainment opportunities are nonetheless important. They challenge us,
stimulate us, excite us and enrich our lives. Our participatory. and spectator sports, outdoor
activities, cultural institutions and community events increase the pleasure of living in the region.
They help attract businesses and skilled workers to our area.
Some of the major challenges in achieving these goals:
• We need to maintain the high level of cultural and recreational opportunities available in the
region today, in light of competing demands for public and private resources.
• We currently do not have the financial resources to implement the regional parks system
currently envisioned. The current estimate is that $300 million will be needed to complete the
development and redevelopment of the system.
• As communities develop, they will be challenged to keep up with the changing recreational
needs of their population, and to establish local park systems early in their development.
• Concerns about access to activities and information will continue to grow as technology
increases and if dispersed growth patterns continue.
Goals
1. The region offers a rich range of cultural opportunities in music, art and theater. Citizens
have more opportunities to take part as active participants as well as to view, watch and listen.
2. Everyone has access to key information sources, including the information and entertainment
media, such as newspapers, magazines, radio, television or any new media that may develop.
Libraries are more accessible and use the latest technology. All private, public, governmental
agency, school and university libraries are linked electronically.
3.
A park system composed of local, regional and state parks provides a wide range of activities.
The regional park system envisioned in 1992 is now completed. Local parks are located
within walking distance of urban residents' homes. A trail system for walking, hiking and
biking is in place throughout the region, within walking distance from urban residents' homes.
Park facilities respond to users needs: they provide recreational. opportunities for all residents
irrespective of age, income or mobility status.
The region has sufficient athletic fields, golf courses, hockey rinks or other recreational
facilities (indoor and outdoor) to meet the standards of the National Recreation and Park
Association. Facilities provide for year -round activities. The number of available activities
and facilities is increasing at least as fast as the population growth rate.
The region is home to major professional sports, and there are sufficient facilities to
accommodate the teams and the fans.
22
Opportunities are available for game fishing in lakes and rivers within the region. Habitat, is
maintained so that there is access to hunting opportunities within a days trip from the region.
4. All major leisure and entertainment facilities in the urban area are accessible b Yp ublic transit.
Examples of Possible Measures (comparison over time)
Attendance at arts performances
Number of amateur sports participants
Number of participants attending professional sporting events
Percent of homes with telephone service
Percent of homes with access to cable television
Miles of public recreational trails
Library circulation data
Acres. of remaining regional parks to be acquired
Number of public access facilities on Lakes and rivers
Park user counts
Attainment of National Recreation and Park Association standards
23
GOPHER FIVE
■ Friday's jackpot: $100,000
■ Winning numbers: 14, 19, 25, 30, 34
0 Winners: One ticket matched. all five.
■ Tuesday's jackpot: $100,000
WISCONSIN MEGABUCKS
• Saturday's jackpot: $ L.4 million
• Winning numbers: 12, 23, 24, 32, 42, 46
WISCONSIN SUPERCASH
■ Sunday's drawing: S. 10, 13, 17, 19, 35
Wisconsin residents call 1-800- 242 -7777.
_ _ r -- - - -- ...- v. vvv Al"111U11 -plus budget
shortfall to balance the two-year budget
he presents to the Legislature in
January. 2C
GOVERNMENT CALENDAR 2C
STATE FAIR CALENDAR 6C
RECYCLING
ST. PAUL 644 -7678
RAMSEY CO. 633-3279
DAKOTA CO. 438-4636
WASHINGTON CO. 430 -6655
Call for information about recycling in your area.
sto el Met Council vision of future
N N E
ANN BAKER STAFF WRITER
T he Metropolitan Council has produced
a vision for the future that the St. Paul
Planning Commission says ignores the
poor, stressing "quality of life" at the
expense of "survival."
In a critique and counterproposal
adopted unanimously Friday, the city's
planning commission compares the Met-
ropolitan Council's draft portrait for the
year 2015 to a "glowing vision state-
ment" that Los Angeles planners pro-
duced shortly before their city was torn
apart by riots in June.
The St. Paul group criticizes the coun-
cil's document as soft, deceptive, elitist
and oblivious to the tough choices that lie
ahead.
"It gives the impression we can have
our cake and eat it," said St. Paul city
planner Allen Lovejoy, who wrote the St.
Paul response.
"The Metropolitan Council is not fac-
ing the real dire situation we're in," Lo-
vejoy said. "It seems to imply we can
have both cheap gas and clean air, can
live on a 5 -acre lot and be five minutes
from work. In fact, we are economically
segregated."
The Metropolitan Council's 23 -page
document, "Metro 2015, Vision and
Goals, will be debated in a public meet -
ing Wednesday at 7 p.m. in the Metropol-
itan Council Chambers, 230 E. Fifth St.
The meeting will be transmitted on Cable
Television Regional Channel 6 and view-
ers can call to ask questions.
"We welcome any suggestion the St.
Paul Planning Commission has," said
Lyall Schwarzkopf, long -range planning
and research director for the Metropoli-
tan Council. "This is a draft vision. If we
have missed those things, that's what we
want them to tell. us."
"Metro 2015" does acknowledge some
of the challenges that confront the region
.�
FUTURE
that conflict with those goals..
They include:
♦ CONTINUED FROM 1 C
Yet the economic goals it pro-
. jects for 23 years ahead are ambi-
tious. They include:
f ■ A highly educated work force
with relevant skills.
■ Job growth with livable wages
for all,
■ Quality of life that attracts
and keeps businesses.
■ Sound infrastructure support -
ed by public and. private invest-
' meat.
■ Taxes that are lower than to-
day's compared to the national
average.
What's missing, according to the
St. Paul Planning Commission; is
recognition that those goals de-
mand tough choices.
Also. missing, say the critics, is
a recognition of existing trends
' a
N A sharp rise in national and
personal debt.
■ Polarization of wealth.
m Disinvestment in public trans -
portation, sewer, schools, police
and libraries.
• Suburban sprawl, which con-
tinues to "gobble up agricultural
land," while jeopa the envi-
ronment and talon Jobs ever fur-
ther from the people who need
them.
"These are things that need to
be considered now," said St. Paul
Planning Commission Chairwom-
an Imogene Treichel. "For the
first time since we came out of
the Depression, I think we have to
make some radical changes. Our
technology and our social isolation
has got to be dealt with in radical
ways."
as it moves toward its goals of expanded
prosperity, improved health and educa-
tion and better access for everyone to
government, housing, information and
recreation.
Among the chief "clouds" it sees on the
economic front, for example, are global
competition, a decline in the local com-
puter industry and loss of major busi-
nesses to non -local control.
FUTURE CONTINUED ON 3C ►
N
Afkl .. _
Planning Commission
Minutes of 8 -17 -92
b.
c.
- 5 -
(1) Al construction shall follow the site plan that the
Cit stamped July 17, 1992. The Director of Community
Deve opment may approve minor changes.
(2) The C ty Council shall review this pe it in one year.
(3) The open for shall have a telephone . n the site for
emergenci s.
(4) If there is not enough parking, e operator or
property own r shall provide mo .paved parking spaces.
(5) The operator all not allow rking on Highway 61.
(6) The operator shill keep the eeds and tall grass cut
along the front �roperty 1' e.
(7) The operator shall provi a toilet facilities for
employees during b sine s hours.
Commissioner Pearson seco ed Ayes-- Allenspach,
Anitzberger, Fischer,
Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach,
Sigmundik
The motion passed.
Single and Double oelling Set�ack Ordinance
Secretary Olson resented the s ff report and discussed
with the Commis on the proposed changes to this ordinance.
Commissioner earson moved the Pla ning Commission recommend
approval of he ordinance changing the setback requirements
0
for
R -1 (S gle dwelling), RE (resi ential estate) , R -1S
(small-lo single dwelling) and R -2 double dwelling),
including the mayor changes proposed 'n the August 10 staff
report a. d the additional wording in he "Front line of the
dwellin." section.
Commissioner Anitzberger
TWe motion passed.
Metro 2015 Review
Ayes - -All spach, Anitzberger,
Fischer, G ke, Pearson,
Rossbach,.Sigmundik
Staff presented the Metro 2015 report from the Metropolitan
Council. The Commission reviewed the document and made the
following comments:
Planning Commission -6-
Minutes of 8 -17 -92
Mary E. Anderson, Chair
Metropolitan Council
Mears Park Centre
230 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1634
METRO 2015 REPORT
Thank -you for sending us a copy of the Metro 2015 report. I
presented the report to the Maplewood Planning Commission.
The Commission had the following comments:
1. In the face of limited resources, how and who will
prioritize regional goals? The Metro 2015 document
does not address this issue.
2. The report lists many lofty goals. Can we afford this
vision? A more realistic vision may be to maintain the
current service levels., The metro region has high tax
rates. New services may be difficult to finance by
raising taxes. The tax base may even decline by 2.015.
The present high tax rates may encourage tax payers to
leave the State. Generous welfare payments encourage
people with low .incomes to move here from other states.
The result may be less tax base in 2015 than we have
now.
3. The report does not address a vision for the region's
size. Will the size of the region expand from the
current seven- county region?
4. In the past, there has been an emphasis on solving
traffic problems by building more roads and widening
existing roads. The Metropolitan Council is
considering whether to add a lane to I -35W or build an
LRT system. The Council's decision on I -35W will set
a precedent for how the region's transportation system
will look in the future. An LRT system may not be
feasible because of the region's low density of
development.
5. The report does not address consolidation of services.
GEOFF OLSON, AICP - DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
7. VISIT P ESENTATIONS
There, a no visitor presentations.
T -3
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: City Manager
FROM: City Clerk
RE: KENNEL APPLICATION - REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
DATE: August 18, 1992
Action by; Council
b:dorsed., ..
Modif ied,,.,�. ..., .
ReJ ecteA, ..,.,�, .
Date
Nancy Champeau, whose Kennel License application was first heard on Jul 27th and
tabled then y
en denied on August 10th, has asked for reconsideration of -her
application,
Ms.. Champeau's letter is attached.
August 1 7, 1992
Dear Mayor Bastian & Council Members:
The ruling on August 10th to deny me a kennel license left me feeling confused
and greatly hurt. I 'would like to request that this issue be reconsidered for the
following reasons:
First of all, the ruling was not based on a unanimous vote. I question the
reasoning behind the votes to deny the permit, and feel that personal opinion
was the basis of the votes rather than upholding the Maplewood ordinance. Mr.
Zappa stated that he didn't feel my kennel was large enough for three dogs;
however, the Animal Control Officer for the city found the size of my kennel to
be within his guidelines. Mr. Rossbeck stated that he didn't understand why
anyone would want three dogs. I am someone who wants three dogs, and I would
like. to be able to do that within the provisions outlined by our city ordinance.
My understanding was that my kennel did meet the guidelines in the ordinanpe
with the exception of a concrete foundation, which I came before the city
prepared to commit to providing upon approval of the kennel license. However.
Mr. Zappa saw denial of the kennel permit as saving me money, which should not
have been the issue ... rather the issue and concern should have in fact been
odor. The only thing that came out of the August 1 oth decision is that I have to
decide. which dog, that we all love as a family, will have to leave. Because the
kennel permit was denied, my kennel doesn't have to tie concreted for two dogs.
I believe my request for a kennel permit with a concrete foundation was made in
good faith that it would provide a permanent solution to any problems already
raised, and that we would find a way to appeal to the city to allow us to keep the
three dogs we thought we could keep under the kennel permit ordinance.
There were statements made during the hearing that left me feeling that I had
been personally attacked. Quite frankly, I was overwhelmed to be treated in
this manner, particularly after having been the target of Mr. Fontaine's
crusade throughout the neighborhood misrepresenting my intentions for the
kennel permit. Although rebuttal response to Mr. Fontaine's misrepre-
sentations was limited, it should be noted that one gentleman stayed until very
late one Monday evening to make sure Council members understood that the case
made by Mr. Fontaine was a misrepresentation of my intentions.
I would like to think that there are some fair minded people making decisions,
no matter how minor in nature, who wil uphold normal citizen's rights in
accordance with the ordinances intended to insure protection of all citizen's
rights. In Fight of the points made above, it is my hope that this matter will be
revisited as early as possible.
Since ely,
Nancy L. Cha peau
s -5
MEMORANDUM
, on by C ounc ile
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner indorse
SUBJECT: Building Plan Review Procedure Ordinance Modifie
DATE: August 27, 19 9 2 Re j ected..-...� -�
That e
INTRODUCTION
The City Council requested an ordinance that would limit the
people who could appeal the staff approval of minor construction
plans and single dwellings. The current ordinance allows anyone
to appeal a staff decision within 15 days of that decision.
The Council raised this issue because of a delay in the
construction of a new home for Mr. Rick Westberg on Hazelwood
Avenue. Mr. Westberg wanted to build his home further back than
the maximum 35 -foot setback required by Code. Staff approved the
setback after the adjacent neighbors said they had no objections.
Several council members wanted to add this request to the next
agenda, so Mr. Westberg would not have to wait 15 days for a
decision. However, we had to wait the full fifteen days in case
anyone else appealed.
BACKGROUND
Under the current procedure, the director of community
development makes the first decision. The director only notifies
the city council about this decision. However, the ordinance
allows anyone to appeal this decision. An appeal must be made
within fifteen days after the director sends a copy of the
approved plan to the council. If there is an appeal, the
director sends the appeal to the community design review board.
Anyone may appeal the board's decision to the council. They must
appeal within fifteen days after the board's decision.
On May 28, 1992, the Council tabled this ordinance for changes
from Councilmember Rossbach. Most of his changes apply to the
single and double dwelling setback ordinance. One change applies
to this ordinance. This change shortens the appeal period for
staff decisions from 15 to 5 days. I have made this change on
page on page 3, subsection 25- 65(b). There would still be a 15-
day appeal period for community design review board decisions.
The extra time is needed to prepare minutes.
DISCUSSION
The current ordinance allows anyone to appeal the director's
decision. This causes a delay when the applicant and the city
council agree not to appeal the director's decision. We must
still wait the full fifteen days to see if anyone else appeals
the decision. An appeal from anyone else is unlikely, since I
only notify the applicant and the council..
The proposed ordinance does the following:
10 It limits those who can appeal a decision on a minor
construction project to the applicant, community design
review board and city council. The ordinance limits those
who can appeal a decision on a single dwelling to the
applicant and council. (Subsection 25 -65 (b) on page 3.)
2. It sends an appeal of a single dwelling directly to the city
council. The current ordinance requires that the community
design review board review the appeal first. (Subsection
25 -65 (b) on page 3 .)
3. It shortens the time allowed for the Council to appeal the
director's decision from 15 to 5 days. (Subsection 25 -65
(b) on page 3.)
4o It only requires a community design review board application
for projects that will be reviewed by the board. The
current ordinance requires an application for all projects,
including those that only need staff approval. (Subsection
25-68 on page 4.)
5. It allows the director of community development to determine
the application requirements. The current ordinance
specifies several requirements, many of which have changed.
Some current requirements, such as a mailing list, are not
included in the ordinance. (Subsection 25 -68 on page 4.)
6. It establishes a fee for planning staf f review of plans .
The proposed fees are similar to the fees we now charge for
other planning staff reviews, such as variances and lot
divisions. (Subsection 36 -20(a) on page 5.)
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached ordinance.
gob- 3:appeals.mem (5.3)
Attachment: Ordinance
2
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE PROCEDURE FOR REVIEW OF
BUILDING PLANS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: (I
have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.)
Section 1. This section changes section 25 -65 as follows:
Sec. 25 -65. Approval of plans.
(a) The director of community development shall review all
plans for minor construction. The director shall also review
plans for single dwellings, where required by Code. The city
council shall define minor construction by dollar valuations set
by resolution, from time to time. Before approving the plans,
the director must determine that the plans meet all city
ordinances and policies, including the design standards in
section 25- 70(b). The director may send any plan that he or she
reviews to the community design review board. The director shall
send a copy of any approved plan to the city council.
(b) Only a city council member, community design review
board member or an applicant may appeal the director's decision
about a minor construction project. Only _a city council member
or an applicant may appeal the director's decision 0
about a single
dwelling_ '
"'""'"" "'''rrc e -' F'' " The director shall send an app= _A.,,,n
about a single dwelling to the city council. The effected
Parties may waive their right to an appeal by informing the
director of community development. An appeal must be received by
the director of community development within five (51
days after the director sends a copy of the approved plan to
the city council. The director shall send an appeal of a minor
construction project to the community design review board. The
board's decision shall be final, unless someone appeals it to the
city council within fifteen (15) days after the board's decision.
(c) The community design review board shall review all
other plans. The board's decision shall be final, unless someone
appeals it to the city council within fifteen (15) days after the
board's decision. However, no person shall revise a plan that
the city council originally approved without their approval.
(d) This section shall not apply to interior construction,
repair, maintenance, underground tanks or the same -style
replacement of building parts, such as a new roof, door or
windows.
3
Section 2. This section changes section 25 -68 as follows:
Sec. 25 - 68 • Application. Aw,.~p en9 F 6. ,r,ax' e Aa
Ana to amA i:nfApmnl�An
All persons required to submit building or remodeling plans to
the community design review board,, i,ncludina„ appeals, *'ft
shall submit a community design review board application
to the director of community_ development.. The filing
requirements shall be determined by the director of community_
development. A fee, but no application is required for planning
staff reviews of single dwellings and minor construction ag, -i=
j ects. z� -�-� -v - - -- - '-°°- =3- t- e3A -Ltu
e
a s %41 %ozo 'E %eo � / •
'}- -e}�}� • =3m= A := M &x= fin
• •
A. A
e
s
r ITCs — LTT� T7'zT — � f�
l J
s 1 •
o
• • Mgt =M4 3
• •
• •
ee s—.
•
'�W o—f
� - s rvrr� --E
im no==0=4 M M
%a.4 a
I I Ou-1-
ef
s
•
'}- -e}�}� • =3m= A := M &x= fin
•
A. A
e
-% j= =1:1= 4=LIM np / {}---@ •
• • •
0 •
/ 41
Section 3. Add the following fees to section 36- 20(a):
Where the Code requires that the director of community
development review plans for single dwellings. (The director
of community development shall add this fee to the buildingf
pe rmit . ) . . . . . . • . . . •.• . . . . . • . . . 0 . . . . . 0 0 0 . . .
Review of minor construction projects by the director of
community development. (The director of community development
shall add this fee to the building permit ................ $85
County recording fee for resolutions.................
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval.
Approved by the Maplewood City Council on , 1992.
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN IBW BOARD
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
MAY 12 , 19 9 2
1.
2.
3.
Absent
Absent
Present
Presen
Prese
Abse
oved approval of the minutes of April
Donald Moe
Marvin Erickson
Michael Holder
Marie Robinson
Bruce Thompson
Scott Wasiluk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. April 28, 1992
Boardmember Thom P sc�
28 1992, as subm' t
Boardmember Hol r secon ed Ayes -- Holder, Robinson,
Thompson
40 APPROVAL OF AGEND
Boardmember Thom son moved approva of the agenda as submitted.
Boardmember Ho der seconded Ayes Holder, Robinson,
Thompson
50 UNFINISHED YJSINESS
6. DESIGN REVIEW
a. Code Amendment - Appeal Procedure
Secretary Ekstrand presented the staff report and discussed
. with the Board the proposed code amendment that would limit
the people who could appeal the staff approval of minor
construction plans and single dwellings.
Boardmember Holder moved approval of the ordinance changing
the procedure for review of building plans.
Boardmember Thompson seconded Ayes -- Holder, Robinson,
Thompson
7. VISITOR ENTATIONS
There we no visitor presentations.
7 :08 p.m.
.-A-LL TO ORDER
Acting Chairperson Robinson called the meeting to order at
ROLL
S -1
MEMORANDUM Act-ion by Council:.
Endorsed
TO: City Manager .
Modlf 1e
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Rene cted —
SUBJECT: Single and Double Dwelling Setback Ordinance
DATE: August 19, 1992 Date
INTRODUCTION
Councilmember Rossbach is proposing
change the regulations about single
I have added additional changes to
had with the ordinance.
an ordinance that would
and double dwelling setbacks.
correct problems that we have
BACKGROUND
September 9, 1991: The City Council approved the current
ordinance. The current ordinance requires a setback from 30 to
35 feet. The Director of Community Development may approve a
larger setback if the house meets one of five conditions in the
ordinance.
DISCUSSION
The proposed ordinance makes the following major changes for the
R -1 (single dwelling) , RE (residential estate) , R -1S (small-lot
single dwelling), and R -2 (double' dwelling) districts: .
1. It adds new definitions of setbacks and drops conflicting
requirements for setback encroachments, such as overhangs.
In the current code, one definition allows two feet of
overhangs and another definition allows 18 inches of
overhangs. (Section 36 -6 on page 3.)
2. It requires that a house be set back between the setbacks of
adjacent houses. (Subsection 36 70(a)(1) on page 4.)
3. It allows a house to be at or five feet behind the
predominant setback. The current ordinance requires that a
house be at the predominant setback. (Subsection 36-
70 (a) (2 ) on page 4 .)
4. Despite the setbacks for new construction, this ordinance
would allow homeowners to add onto their homes using the
setback of the existing structure. (Subsection 36 70(a) (4)
on page 5.) As an example, a house set back 40 feet could
add on to the front of the house at 40 feet. The current
code requires a maximum setback of 35 feet.
5. Where there is a garage and dwelling on one side of a lot,
the minimum setbacks shall be five feet for the garage and
ten feet for the house. The current ordinance requires ten
feet for both. (Section 36 -71(a) on page 5.)
6. It requires that corner lots meet the maximum setback
requirements on both streets. The maximum setbacks in the
current ordinance only apply to the front setback.
(Subsection 36-71(a) (1) on page 5.)
70 It allows uncovered decks to be up to five feet from the
side lot line. Covered decks must be at least ten feet from
the side lot line. The current code does not define what
the setback for decks shall be. (Subsection 36-71 (a) ( on
page 6.)
8. It exempts the RE -40 zone from the maximum front setback
requirements, (Section 3 6 -8 3 (c) (2) on page 6.)
Note that I have repeated the changes on pages 3 -6 on pages 4 -11
for the R -1S and R -2 districts.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached ordinance.
go\b-3: setbacks. mem (5.3)
Attachment: Ordinance
2
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLINGS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: (I
have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.)
Section 1. This section changes three existing definitions and
adds seven new definitions to section 36 -6 (definitions).
Covered structure: A structure with a roof.
Front line of the dwelling;. The longer side of a building
that faces a street. If the front wall has an ana_le, the lon est
section shall be the front line. The lenath of parallel sections
shall be added together to determine the longest section. on an
interior lot, the director of community development may consider
the short side of the building to be the front. The director
w
shall base this decision on the design of the house.
Front lot line: The lot line that abuts a street right -of-
way line. On a corner lot, the front lot line shall be the line
that is most parallel to the front line of the dwelling. If the
City determines that the dwelling has no front line or that the
line is equally_, parallel to both lot lines, then the prop erty
owner shall choose a front lot line.
Lot depth: The distance from the front lot line to the rear
lot lines.
Predominant setback: The setback of the majority of the
dwellings on the same side of the same street and within three
hundred fifty (3 feet of the lot to be built on.
Rear lot line: The lot line that is opposite and most
parallel to the front lot line.
Side lot line: The lot lines that connect the front and
rear lot lines.
Front yard setback: The distance between any part of a
structure and a street right -of -way line. A corner lot shall
have a front yard setback on each street frontage. The front
yard setback shall not include eaves, gutters, cornices or
chimneys that project no more than two (2) feet into the yard.
The front yard setback shall also not include sidewalks, steps
ramps or at -grade patios that have no walls, solid fence or roof.
Rear yard setback The distance between any_part of a
structure and the rear property line. The rear yard shall not
include eaves, gutters, cornices, steps, ramps or chimneys that
project no more than two (2) feet into the yard.
Side yard setback: The distance between any part of a
structure and the side property line. The side yard shall not
include eaves, gutters , cornices, steps, ramps or chimneys that
project no more than two (2)-feet into the yard.
• e o •
EVIq
• ,
o i
•
•
•
o
I.
o •
•
•
• /
• • o
/ / eernl. /
•
o •
•
s e •
/ /
•
Section 2. This section changes section 36 -70 through 36 -72, R -1
(single dwelling) district regulations, as follows:
Sec. 36 -70. Front yards.
(a) Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a
front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more
than thirty -five (35) feet. Except that : ,—
If each of the lots next to an interior lot have
dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of
the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The
maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent
dwelling farthest from the street.
(2) If subsection (a)(1) above does not apply and there is
a_ predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further
forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the
predominant setback i :6 �� -- =- 0 ^�; � Af #-rte -4��3 i ; �-�-
• a LL%�.r � te . � 0 A. v�aw yr yr v .9. J6 .a.
A= . a T+.
V V� .p L •
(3) Regardless of the above, if the Council has approved
special setbacks for a development, these setbacks
shall apply Approval of a preliminary plat with
building pads does not constitute approval of setbacks.
Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback.
The director of community development may allow a
different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage
of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions
apply:
(1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of
adjacent homes.
(2) The proposed setback would save significant natural
features, as defined in section 9 -188.
(3) The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state
or federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or
noise regulations.
(4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving,
health or safety reasons•
T.16 1 e IEL e... u s e s s • :1= ]a 3 =1 ad= a r -
I= �. rr tr =
•
Sec. 36 -71. Side yards.
(a) There shall be IHEAE .Tn� a side yard setback
of at least ten (10) feet to en any covered Dart ~ S a ~
of a dwelling There shall be a side yard ,setback of at
least f ive (5) feet to vi-z — cr�'rc a garage uncovered structure 91.de
or a detached accessory structure '_� = „' W1:10=0 b,.
•
•
The following exceptions shall apply:
5
(1) The front yard setback requirements shall apply to the
e side yard on the street side of a corner lot_ a w 1. 4%0 F 1:1 Ax X eta=
e z= - �e ,.r -- - i -ice % - _ - , - % 00 % Wp - =
• •
r - - --
E. E31 A& %eo cq :; x e e u n 1% =-# L.36 LL&%.4 reve a e e n • s • • .
• • o • • use
�s
_MJ } - When two (2) or more adj oining lots are used as a
single building site, the side yard requirements
shall apply only to the outside lot lines.
R egardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback.
(b), The city council may approve a conditional use permit
to construct a building addition into a minimum setback.
Sec. 36 - 72. Rear yards.
(a) For the covered parts of a dwelling, the minimum
required rear yard setback shall be a line connecting =point on
each side lot line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth.
T�Z _ T� T I
(b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall
have a rear yard setback of at least five ( 5 ) feet.;
except that, on a double-fronting ee nrc= lot, the front y-
setback requirements shall apply. ��-O j ^ ^'�"�" . 4%0J A "'�i % 01
s
(c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line.
(d) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback.
The city council may approve a conditional use permit
to construct a building addition into a minimum setback.
Section 3 . This section changes section 3 6-83 (c) (2) in the R -E
Residential Estate Districts as follows:
(2) All other setbacks shall be as required for the R -1
Residence District (single dwelling) except that the
R -1 front yard setback requirements shall not apply=
the RE -40 district. The minimum required front yard
setback in an RE -40 district shall be thirty (30) feet.
Section 4. Th section changes sections 36 - 84.4 through 36-
84.6, R -1S (small -lot single dwelling) district regulations, as
follows:
Sec. 36 - 84.4. Front yards.
Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a
front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more
than thirty-five (35) feet . Except that: r
If each of the lots adj acent to an interior lot have
dwellings, the minimum setback shall be the setback of
the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The
maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent
dwelling farthest from the street.
If subsection (a)(1) above does not apply and there is
a predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further
forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the
predominant setback A. 4= =�-�T Af —�i-4� -3 i A.
o • •
%4. OL %d e •
• s •
im l= l^ =1 .■.ls
If the Council has approved special setbacks for a
development, these setbacks shall apply. Approval of a
preliminary plat with building pads does not constitute
approval of setbacks.
Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback_
The director of community development may allow a
different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage
of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions
apply:
(1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of
adjacent homes.
(2) The proposed setback would save significant natural
features, as defined in section 9 -1880
(3) The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state
or federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or
noise regulations•
(4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy - saving,
health or safety reasons.
r e e.H... _, . A-
° -e- use- t�sa -e�
Sec. 36 - 84.5. Side yards.
There shall be
feet to any covered part
yard setback of at least
structure or detached aci
e J - = e- �e -r— s-
apply:
a side yard setback of at least ten (10
of a dwelling. There shall be a side
five (5) feet to a garage, uncovered
�essory structure. ' 3 "}' vi' 3 U AX:e
r. (y
r, e e f • 1 •� r it 4 EV
r
The following exceptions shall
(1) The front yard setback requirements shall apply to the
side yard on the street side of a corner lot
7h =I:% X a �% 0 4 4 i= Ici n
A&'GtV J'.&. %CL�.�e'ar�Tt'..'� lv -(� C) ) '�� -. _-_ •
121+3+ When two (2) or more adj oining lots are used as a
single building site, the side yard requirements
shall apply only to the outside lot lines.
Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback.
The city council may approve a conditional use permit
to construct a building addition, or part thereof, into a minimum
setback.
Sec. 36 - 84.6 Rear yards.
(a) For the covered parts of a dwelling, the minimum
required rear yard setback shall be a line connecting a point on
each side lot'line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth.
(b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures
shall have a rear yard setback of at least five (5) feet except
Fool
that,. on a double- fronting lot, the front yard setback
requirements shall apply.
(c) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line.
Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback_
The city council may approve a conditional use permit
to construct a building addition.into a minimum setback.
Section 5. This section changes sections 36 - 89 through 36 - 91, R-
2 (double dwelling) district regulations, as follows:
Sec. 36 - 89. Front yards.
Each dwelling and accessory structure shall have a
front yard setback of at least thirty (30) feet, but not more
than thirty -five (35) feet . Except that: r
If each of the lots adjacent to an interior lot have
dwellings the minimum setback shall be the setback of
the adjacent dwelling closest to the street. The
maximum setback shall be the setback of the adjacent
I
dwelling farthest from the street.
If subsection (a (1) above does not apply and there is
a predominant setback, a dwelling shall be no further
forward and no more than five feet to the rear of the
predominant setback. -ice t �e3� � f t,��-
If the Council has approved special setbacks for a
specific development, these setbacks shall ap ly_
Approval of a preliminary plat with building pads does
not constitute approval of setbacks.
Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback.
The director of community development may allow a
different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage
of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions
apply:
(1) The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of
adjacent homes.
(2) The proposed setback would save significant natural
features, as defined in section 9 -188.
(3) The proposed setback is necessary to meet city, state
or federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback or
noise regulations•
(4) The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving,
health or safety reasons.
. .
.
/ /
'
sec. 36 - 90. Side yards.
(a) There shall be 9 "%a.&%eAn : ham' ha..ve a side yard setback
of at least ten (10) feet to en any covered part
of a dwelling. There shall be a side yard setback, of at
least five (5) feet to �� 4 EO a garage , uncovered structure -iele
or a detached accessory structure 'tee
The following exceptions shall apply:
(1) The front yard setback requirements shall apply to the
side yard on the street side of a corner lot_ t :2 (1 SO1TQZZ�TCrP"G 'CI �.--- -
s e • •
saifte %e VIF A.
•
/ /
-M+3+ When two (2) or
single building
shall apply only
more adjoining lots
site, the side yard
to the outside lot
are used as a
requirements
lines.
Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes usin th e existing setback.
(b) The city council may approve a conditional use permit
to construct a building addition, or part thereof, into a minimum
setback.
10
Sec. 36 -91. Rear yards.
(a) For the covered parts of a dwelling, the minimum
required rear yard setback shall be a line connecting a point on
each side lot line that is twenty (20) percent of the lot depth.
3
(b) Accessory structures and uncovered structures shall
have a rear yard setback of at least five (5 fee
t
except that, on a double - fronting =c=n == lot, the front y=
setback requirements shall apply. ' � j set-b ~'C -Own=
• e •
e
(c ) A corner lot shall have only one rear lot line.
(d) Regardless of the above, homeowners may add on to their
homes using the existing setback
The city council may approve a conditional use permit
to construct a building addition, into a minimum setback.
Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect after its approval.
Approved by the Maplewood City Council on , 1992.
11
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 8 -17 -92
(1) All construction shall follow the site plan that the
City stamlQed July 17, 1992. Thtanges.
Director of Community
Developmen may approve minor
(2) The City Cou3qi1 shall review this permit in one year.
(3) The operator sha have telephone on the site for
emergencies.
(4) If there is not eno g parking, the operator or
property owner sh 1 p ovide more paved parking spaces.
(5) The operators 11 not al ow parking on Highway 61.
(6) The operator shall keep the eeds and tall grass cut
along the ont property line.
(7) The. oper or shall provide toile facilities for
employes during business hours.
Commission r Pearson seconded Ayes -- llenspach,
Anitzbe er, Fischer,
Gerke, Pe rson, Rossbach,
Sigmundik
The otion passed.
b. Single and Double Dwelling Setback ordinance
Secretary Olson presented the staff report and discussed
with the Commission the proposed changes to this ordinance.
Commissioner Pearson moved the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the ordinance changing the setback requirements
for R -1 (single dwelling) , RE (residential estate), R -1S
(small -lot single dwelling) and R -2 (double dwelling),
including the major changes proposed in the August 10 staff
report and the additional wording in the "Front line of the
dwelling" section.
Commissioner Anitzberger Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitzberger,
Fischer, Gerke, Pearson,
Rossbach, Sigmundik
The motion passed.
C* Metro 2015 Review
The Commi s( reviewed the letter to the Metropolitan
Council do ting the Planning Commission /Council
comments. Commission approved the letter and referred
it to st ff be mailed.
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire
From: Chief of Police Kenneth V. C o l l i n
Subject: Request to F i l l Full-Time Police Officer Position
Date: September 9, 1992
Introduction
Action by Council:]
Endorse
Modif
-R j ected
The 1992 approved budget included the hiring of a full -time Police Officer
after August 1, 19920
It is our plan to fill this position with a current part -time Police Officer,
who is also a certified Paramedic.
Recommendation
Permission be granted to fill this full -time Police Officer position.
Action Reguiired
Submit to the City Council for their review and approval.
KVC:js
c7"'*'—.3
AGENDA REPORT
To: City Manager Michael McGuire .�
• o of Public c Safet Kenneth V. Collins
From. Director y . C
Subject: Part -Time Public Safety Dispatcher
Date. September 9, 1992
Introduction
Ac tion by Council:l
Endorse
M o d i f i e d..�..... ---�
Rej e ct e ,.....::�.
Date
The p Y
Maplewood City Council approved the hiring of a part -time Public Safety
Dispatcher in our 1992 budget.
Background
The Public Safety Department currently has a shortage of Public Safety
p
Dis atchers that was created through a termination and a requested maternity
leave.
B g
Because of these shortages, our current Dispatchers are required to work extended shifts and also work on their days off.
The
hi ri n g part-time of a t -time Dispatcher w i l l give us greater flexibility with scheduling, hich will allow us to cover peak hours. It will also help to
g ' full -time Dispatchers*
reduce the overtime and the stress it creates on our p
Recommendation
Permission be granted to fill the part -time Dispatcher vacancy.
Action Required
Submit to the City Council for their review and approval.
KVC:js
AGENDA NO. /)! "' I
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Manager ---`�
RE: SCHEDULE A COUNCH MEETING
DATE: September 4, 1992
kction by Council:
Endorsed
Modif i ed� ----- ---•-*
Red ecte
Date
There are several topics that need to be reviewed at a Council /Manager meeting. Some
of these items should be discussed before the end of October.
Suggested dates are:
Thursday, October 15
Monday, October 19
Thursday, October 29
Just a reminder about the meeting with the Fire Departments on Monday, October 5,
5:00 - 7:00 p.m. in the Maplewood Room.
tmc