Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992 06-22 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday June 22, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No, 92 -12 A.. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 92 -10, May 28, 1992 2. Council Meeting June 3 1992 3. Special Council Meeting /Mayor's Forum, June 2, 1992 4, Meeting No, 92 -11, June 8, 1992 E. APPROVAL OF .AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS 1. Mn /DOT Representative F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the C o n '1 � C u c i and will be enacted by one motion,, There will be no separate discussion on these i tems .. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Project 90 -07: Assessment Error 3. Conditional Use Permit Termination Ken -na.rd St.. (Korridor Capital Investments, Inc.) 4 Preliminary Pl Time Extension: Beth Heights Addition 5. Prel -mi nary Mat Time Extension: Mark's Nature Haven 6. Preliminary Pl Ti me Extension: Highwood Estates No. 2 7. Conditional Use Permit Review :2210 White Bear Avenue (GAC) 8. 1992 Dispatching Contracts 9. Budget Transfer Request - Repair of Roof G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :05 P.M., Alley Vacation: West of Birmingham St., Between Lark Ave. and Laurie Rd. e Gra ( p) 2 7s15 P.M., 1847 Kohlman Avenue (Mosio) Code Variation Lot Division 3. 7:30 P.M., Ordinance on Temporary Signs and Sin Enforcement ' y g g ent (1st Reading) 4. 7:40 P.M., Commercial Uses Ordinance (1st Reading) H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Property, Liability and Workers' Compensation Insurance 2. P1- easantyiew Park Site Improvements and Plantings 3. Land,scape Architect for Park Plantings I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Comprehensive Plan Update. (4 Votes) 219 Sterl i:ng/Schaller, Project 87 -45 - Easements J. NEW BUSLNESS 1. Beam Avenue /Frank Street - Stop Signs. 2. Keller =Parkway - No Parking 3 Highwood /McKnight Outlet, Project 90 -10 - Prepare Assessment Roll 4. Roselawn Avenue - Additional Culverts K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. N. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M.,.Thursday, May 28, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building t Meeting No. 92 -1.0 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7 :00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Dale H, Carlson, Councilmember Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa., Councilmember- Present D. � OF MINUTES: 1. Council /Manager Meeting May 4, 1992 Councilmember Zappa moved to a rave the minutes of Counci 1 Mana er Meeti n of May 4. 1992 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all ,2. Meeting No. 92 -09 (May 1992) Councilmember Rossbach moved to aDDrove the minutes of Meeting No. 92 -09 . (May 11 1992) as corrected: Page 10, Item H, 1 d: Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 3. Council /Manager Meeting May 13, 1992 Councilmember Zappa moved to aDprove the minutes of Council Mana er Meetin of May 13, 1992 as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: U. Progress on CWWMMI Project L2. Dead End at 120 and Highway 5 L3. Letter to Media re Paper Tubes L4* People Who Do Clean-Up Along Right -Of -Ways L5, Tuesday, June 2, Comprehensive Land Use Plan Meeting M1. June 15 Council /Manager Meeting Seconded by Zappa Ayes - all 5 -28 -92 1 2. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2120 -2124 Woodlynn Ave. (Village on Woodlynn) Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for Village on Woodl ynn , 2120 -2124 Woodl ynn Ave . , amended to cont i nue unt i 1 1997 (5 years) . 3. I- 494 /Lake Road Interchange Moved to I -3 - 4-. Budget Transfer: Roselawn Moved to J -11 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Brenda Whyte: Assessment - Improvement 90 -01 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. 5 -28 -92 2 F.., CONSENT AGENDA ' Counc i 1 member Zappa moved, seconded by Counci 1 member, Carlson: ayes -, al l , to aRRrove the consent agenda items F -1 and F -2 as recommended, (Item-13 moved to become 1 -3 and Item F4 moved to become-J-11. 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 120 Checks #23001 - #23307 Dated 5 -1 -92 thru 5 -7 -92 S 107,604.41 Checks #17077 - #17215 Dated 5 -28 -92 $ 228 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 198 Payroll Checks #26431 thru #26595 Dated 5 -8 -92 S 40,665.23 Payroll Deduction Checks #26600 thru #26615 dated 5 -8 -92 $ 238 9 831.66 Total Payroll S 466 GRAND TOTAL 2. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2120 -2124 Woodlynn Ave. (Village on Woodlynn) Reviewed and approved renewal of the Conditional Use Permit for Village on Woodl ynn , 2120 -2124 Woodl ynn Ave . , amended to cont i nue unt i 1 1997 (5 years) . 3. I- 494 /Lake Road Interchange Moved to I -3 - 4-. Budget Transfer: Roselawn Moved to J -11 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Brenda Whyte: Assessment - Improvement 90 -01 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. 5 -28 -92 2 c. Councilmember Zappa. ved to take no actin on this assessment agDeal . Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 2. 3 - M. Meeting a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report, b. Councilmember Zappa moved to meet on Thursda June 18 at 8:00 a.m. to op , M Building 275. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - y all 3. I- 494 /Lake Road Interchang ( ,Moved from .3 9 ) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider resented the specifics P p of the report. c. C i ty Attorney Kelly clarified Mapl ewood' s role in t h i s Woodbury y d. Mayon Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak be ' y p fore the council regarding this matter. The following persons appeared: Ken Mahle, Mayor of Woodbury, spoke on behalf of the ro'ec p � t and offered Woodbury's help in resolving any questions or roblems involving Maplew P g p wood res � dents . Don Whitaker, 751 Century Avenue South, spoke against the ro'ect P J Jenny Bruski, 743 Century Avenue South, questioned the advisabilit of the project considering safety, traffic speed, etc. Kelsey Whitaker, 751 Century Avenue South spoke in regard p g d to the response of Woodbury and Maplewood to citizen's questions. Abby Grundfeldt, Cobblehill Alcove, Woodbury, spoke in regard to Environmental As g Assessment Worksheet questions. Jim Scholz, 2355 Century Avenue South, Woodbury, spoke against the project. Dick Jansen, 3056 Camelot Circle, Woodbury, spoke against the P 9 project. e. Councilmember Zappa introduced the followin Resolution and moved its adoation: 92 -05 -50 RESOLUTION APPROVING LAYOUT OF I- 494 /LAKE ROAD INTERCHANGE WHEKIPAS the City of Woodbury proposes to construct a new interchange at I -494 and Lake Road and WHEREAS, Lake Road connects to Century Avenue South of Linwood Avenue in the City of Maplewood, and 5 -28 -92 3 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested layout approval from Maplewood, and WHEREAS, the City of woodbury has completed an environmental assessment for the project, and WHEREAS, the Environmental Quality Board has completed its review of the project, and WHEREAS, the interchange and connecting roadways are consistent with the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, several single family homes in Maplewood w i l l be affected by the project, and WHEREAS, the effects of the project could be mitigated by installation of driveway turnarounds, sidewalks, trees, or other appropriate improvements, and WHEREAS, installation of mitigating measures may require easements or additional right -of -way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. The layout of the I- 494 /Lake Road Interchange is approved. 2. The project shall, at no cost to the Maplewood homeowners, provide driveway turnarounds, sidewalks, trees or other such appropriate improvements to those :homes. on the West side of Century Avenue from Linwood Avenue to 1,200 feet South. 3. The Maplewood City Engineer is directed to act as liaison between the,Maplewood residents and Woodbury representatives to design imprvements in Maplewood. 4. The City of Woodbury is relieved of responsibility under Item 2 above for properties not granting appropriate easements for installation of improvements. 5. The Maplewood City Council reserves approval authority of final construction plans for that portion of the project in the City of Maplewood. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Rossbach J. NEW BUSINESS I.. Request for Temporary Signs: County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. 5 -28 -92 4 c. A representative from Ramsey County responded to questions about the need for the additional signs. d. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. e. Mayor Bastian moved to approve the request for temaorarv_ signs under= following conditions: I. The i s i gns shall only be up on the days that the collection facility s open. 2. The signs shall not be within the sight triangle that is described in Section 29 -136 of City Code. 3. The signs shall be far enough from driveways so the signs will not obstruct drivers' visibility. 40 The signs shal 1 be at least six feet from the edge of the street or at least. two feet to a sidewalk. This requirement shall not apply to the signs on Van . Dyke Street. 5. The signs shall not exceed eight square feet. 6. The County shall place the signs as shown on the May 18, 1992 site plan, except for Signs Three, Four and five. The County shall move Sign Three off the boulevard and combine Signs. Four and Five into one double -sided sign on the Southeast side of the North St. Paul Road and Ripley Avenue intersection The City Council may approve major changes in this plan, The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Counc i I members Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - None Abstain - Councilmember Ju ker 2. Real Estate Sign. Ordinance (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Boardmember Marie Robinson presented the Community Design Review Board report. d, Mayor , t i an asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard. Karen Christofferson, St. Paul Area Board of Realtors, spoke in favor of the changes. e. Councilmember Zappa moved to amend the Ordinance presented in Section 3 (12) by adding "d." that a SOLD sin may be displayed for only 30 days 5 -28 -92 5 4 pavement, etc. to "eight (8) feet" to Agree with 12 Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker f Cou Rossbach moved 1st readi of the Real Estate Sign Ordinance as amended. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - , Mayor Bastian Councilmembers y Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker 3. ADA Compliance Survey a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant City Manager Magl i ch presented the specifics of the report. c., Counc i i member Carlson moved to table t h i s item to the June 8 meet ng_ with instruction to staff to check into combi n i nQ efforts with ,., the school district and ad i acent cities and Ramsey county, Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 4. Ordinance: Building Plan Review Procedure (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. d. Councilmember Juker moved to table this pendinq an additional ro osed a mendment from Councilmember Rossbach. ��- Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Juker Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmember Carlson 5. Truth -In -Sale of Housing Ordinance (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented`the staff report. b . Councilmember Juker moved to aRRrove 1st reading of the Truths I n -Sal a of Housing .Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 6. Sterling /Schaller Improvements - Project 87 -45 Easements a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 5 -28 -92 6 b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. C. Mayor Bastian moved to table this item until a maD of the Droj area i s a_va i ,l abl e.. Seco by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 7. Change Orders 4 & 5, Roselawn Ave. - Project 87 - 01 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider resented the specifics of the report. P P p c. Councilmember Zappa introduced the fol 1 owi ng Resolution and moved its aDDroval: 92 - 05 - 51 DIRECTING MODIFICATION OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered made Improvement Project 87 -01 and has let a construction contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, it is now necessary and expedient that said contract - be modified and designated as Improvement Project 87 -01, Change Orders 4 and 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed .to modify the existing contract by executing said Change Orders 4 and 5 in the amount of $12,542, and that the project budget is increased by $12,542. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 8. Close Out: Old Developer Projects a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. P p C* Councilmember Zappa moved to close out Developer Projects 87 -21 Ski Jump Property Storm Sewed; 89 -02 (Crown Plaza. Rice and Larpenteur�; 89 -22 (Southwinds Apartments,) and 90 -09 (Maplewood Rental Townhouses} , and the costs of $19,717 be financed by the funds set aside for t h i s purpose in the General Fund. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 9. Gambling Ordinance - 1st Reading a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Safety Collins presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter.. No one appeared. 5 -28 -92 7 d. Councilmember Zappa moved 1st reading of the Gambling Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Carlson 10. Zacho Property - Abatement of Assessment a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following. Resolution and moved its adopt _on_ 92 - 05 - 52 RESOLUTION OF ASSESSMENT ABATEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to a Warranty Deed dated December 24, 1990, the City of Maplewood, a municipal corporation, acquired real property having a property identification number of 25- 29- 22 -24- 0073 -4; WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood acquired the aforementioned real property subject to all unpaid special assessments and accrued interest thereon; WHEREAS, the records of the Ramsey County Assessor reflect an unpaid balance of $7,285...12 as a special assessment levied for Maplewood Public Improvement Project 83- 07 and identified on the records of Ramsey County as DP -5530; WHEREAS, the records of the Ramsey County Assessor also reflect an unpaid bal ance of $1,959:37 as a special assessment levied for Maplewood Public Improvement Project 86 -3. and identified on the records of the Ramsey County Assessor as DP -5655; WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is now the sole owner of record of said real property subject to the aforementioned unpaid special assessments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1) That all existing and levied special assessments and interest relative to PIN No. 25- 29- 22 -24- 0073 -4 are hereby abated; 2) That special assessment DP -5530 in the amount of $7,385.12 is hereby abated; 3) That special assessment DP -5655 in the amount of $1,959.37 is hereby vacated; 4) That the Maplewood City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Ramsey County Assessor immediately. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 11. Budget Transfer - Public Works a. Councilmember Rossbach questioned whether the City would be setting a precedent by paying for pipe requested by the property owner. 5 -28 -92 8 (Al b. Director of Public Works presented the details of the situation. c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to deny the request for the pu l e_ Motion died for lack of a second. d. Councilmember Zappa moved to authorize using $4,000 from the Cont i ngency Account to finance the proposal Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Rossbach K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS I. Richard Janisch, Leland Road a. Mr. Jani sch addressed the Council regarding the storm .sewer installation by his property and his concerns about tree damage from. the requested easement and storm sewer. Stated he has now agreed to the easement and has been told there is not enough money to complete the catch basin and grading. b. Director of Public Works Haider responded to questions about the project. c. Councilmember Rossbach moved that staff recommend the best _way, to accomplish the drainage and place this item on the Ju 8, .1992 agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all L.. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. CWWNI a. Councilmember Juker requested an update on the City Wide Water Main Improvements, stating she had received reports of sodding and filling work that had not been done. b. Director of Public Works Haider reported on current status of work on the project. 2. Dumping at Highways 120 and 5 a . Councilmember Zappa stated there is dumping occurring on the land at the intersection of Highways 120 and 5. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to instruct staff to check on this with respect to the States purposes and the environmental impact of the dumping. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 3. Paper Tubes a. Councilmember Zappa commented on the poor appearance of paper tubes and posts all over the City. 5 -28 -92 9 b. Councilmember Zappa moved that staff write. to the 3 newspapers serving the City and re guest that they reua�, or replace al] damaged and uns i Qhtl _v newspaper posts tubes in Map l ewo_ od . Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 4. Road Clean -Up Volunteers a. Councilmember Zappa commented that the volunteers who are cleaning up the road sides, etc . are doing an excellent job and that the City is looking much better. b. Councilmember Zappa m, ove,d t, h t ,staff write letters to be placed in the newspapers and in Maplewood -In- Motion commending those volunteers for their work. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 5. Comprehensi Land Use Plan Meeting June 2 a Mayor Bastian commented on the upcoming "Mayor's Forum " /Council Meeting being held on Tuesday, June 2 to discuss the Comprehensive Land Use Plan update and requested Council and Staff mention it to residents and encourage them to attend and voice their opinions. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Upcoming Meetings a. Manager McGuire commented on upcoming meetings and stated that Council needed to set a time for the meeting at 3M. b. Mayor Bastian moved the 3M meeting be at 8:00 a.m. on June 18. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all N. ADJOURNMENT of MEETING Meeting adjourned at 9:18 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 5 - 28 -92 10 COUNCH4WANAGER MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTI'Y OF MAPLEWOOD 4 :30 p.m., Wednesday, June 3, 1992 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:30 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present Councilperson Dale Carlson Present Councilperson Fran Juker Absent Councilperson George Rossbach Present Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire, Assistant Ci ty Manager er Gretchen Maglich, Human Resource Director Gail Blackstone, Finance Director Dan Faust, Parks & Recreation Director Robert Odegard, and Public Safety Director Kenneth Collins. C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda: E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Mosquito Control 2. Ramsey County's Highlights of 1991 Councilperson Zappa moved that the agenda be approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Mayor Bastian and was approved. Ayes: Bastian, Carlson, Rossbach and Zappa Absent: Juker 1 D. AKR'S PRESENTATION OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES City Manager McGuire introduced the architects from AKR, Mr. Fred Richter, Mr. Duane Kell, Mr. Mike Eckardt, and Mr. Ron der. The architects presented three different design alternatives based on expansion possibilities, soils, traffic, exposure to sun and winds, visibility of the building from the street, accessibility to service vehicles, and internal control points. After considerable discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that the architects would consolidate the Council's suggestions and thoughts into the final design to be presented on June 15th. E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Mosquito Control Councilperson Zappa stated his concern that the cost of mosquito control in the metropolitan area is much greater than the benefit and that he will bring this subject up at a regular Council meeting to ask for some Council action. 2. Ramsey Counts Highlights of 1991 Councilperson Zappa asked staff to investigate the cost of producing the document titled "Ramsey County Highlights of 1991" and to what extent the document is made available to the public or the intended audience. F. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 5:51 p.m. 2 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL !� 6:00 P.M., Tuesday, June 2, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building s Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER: A special meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Mayor Bast i an . Be ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Frances L. Juker, Councilmember George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present Present Present Present Present B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for discussion and public commentary regarding the proposed update of the Maplewood Comprehensive Land Use Plan. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented an overview of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, its purpose and the topics covered by chapter. c. Councilmember Zappa inquired as to the number of b u i l d e r s , developers or realtors in attendance at this meeting. One developer responded. d. Councilmember Rossbach commented on various matters that Council must consider relative to land use, e.g., zoning, preserving residential areas, and determining what is the highest and best use for a property. e. Mayor Bastian commented on the need to meet various City, State and Federal guidelines relative to pollution, noise considerations and other conditions. f. Director of Community Development Olson identified the various areas of the City by name, general boundaries and district number, to determine which areas were represented by those in attendance. g . Mayor Bastian stated that if anyone in the cable viewing audience wished to share any views on the Plan, the City Manager would be available to take calls until 8:00 P.M. at 770 -4529. h. Mayor Bastian invited comments from residents and developers by district. The following appeared: 1 6 -2 -92 District 4_Haz wood Area Vince Dressen, representing Ryan - Construction, stated his organization is attempting to develop 38 acres at the Southwest corner of White Bear Avenue and 11th Avenue and presented an update of their progress. Resident of the area (did not give name) stated he was in favor of the development but was concerned about the way it was progressing. Zelma Pitzel, 2005 Castle Avenue, stated she is in favor of full development of the area, not partial. The owner of Northern Wood Products, located near White Bear Avenue and Highway 36, stated he is fully in favor of the proposed development. Maria McGraw, 1958 Gervais, stated she felt there should be no development until Ryan has purchased all property in that block and not leave some portions residential. Kay Perron, who owns property at the end of Gervais, inquired why she has been charged a commercial rate for sewer and water since 1971 if her property is zoned commercial. Doug Mi 1 etta, 2416 White Bear Avenue, asked for clarification of the term "sunset" as it relates to a zoning request; suggested the City give a developer a set period of time after the hearing to accomplish the i r aim or have the property revert to previous zoning. Roger Kult, 2444 White Bear Avenue, stated he supported the proposed development. Nina Hardin, 1970 Gervais, asked about completion of the City Wide Watermain project. District.7: South Gladstone Delores Kaufman, Daughter of the Johnson's, who own 1717 White Bear Avenue, inquired about the possibility of rezoning, since they are trying to sell the house and have been unable to do so. District 10: Battle Creek Area Mr. Nordstrom asked about zoning and commercial areas relative to a filling station and a Tom Thumb store which he stated have become eyesores in this area. District 12: Highwood Area Bill Poppert, Highwood Avenue, asked about whether open space was taken into consideration when preparing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and stated he would like to see a more pro - active role taken through the Plan. i. Les Axdahl inquired about the status of the proposed 494 /Lake Road interchange and the impact of this interchange on the surrounding R -1 area. N 2 12 -27 -90 j. Kevin Berglund inquired about various environmental and health matters, and whether there might be consideration of an overpass or underpass for Highway 36 in consideration of people who do not drive cars* also whether there might some other areas which might look forward to something like the proposed community center. k. Lorraine Fischer asked for additional i nformati.on on the planned walking trail, bike paths and accessibility, relative to the Seniors Advisory Committee; also commented on park acreage and potential problem areas where commercial and R -3 zoning might create conflict. 1. Mayor Bastian stated the Comprehensive Land Use Plan would appear on the June 22, 1992 Council Meeting Agenda for a vote on its acceptance. M. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:48 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 3 12 -27 -90 MINUTES OF NAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7 :00 P.M., Monday, June 8, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 92 -11 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7 :00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian, 60 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Frances L. Juker, Councilmember George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1, Meeting No. 92 -10 (Thursday, May 28, 1992) Present Present Present Present Present Councilmember Zappa moved to table the Minutes of Meeting 92 -10, (May. 28, 9 until. the June 22 meeting.. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL. OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: L1. July 6 Meeting L2. Frank's Nursery Problems L3. White Bear Avenue Traffic Report L4. Job Share Position L59 Volunteer Pool L6* City Project Review M1. Ariel & Highway 36 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa C. CONSENT AGENDA: Ayes - all a. Councilmember Zappa moved, seconded by Councilmember Carlson* ayes - all, to aRRrove the consent agenda items 1. 4. 5. 6. and 7 as recommended. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve Items 2 and 3. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Juker 1 6 -8 -92 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 993 Checks #23020 - #23125 Dated 5 -7 -92 thru 5 -29 -92 S 95,923.58 Checks #17226 - #17331 Dated 6 -8 -92 $1,089,167.99 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 196 Payroll Checks #26628 thru #26787 Dated 5 -22 -92 S 39.168.02 Payroll Deduction Checks #26792 thru #26807 dated 5 -22 -92 $ 236 Total Payroll $1,325 GRAND TOTAL 2. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (L. Rudie) Authorized cancellation of the balance (5447.78) remaining after Medicare payments from two ambulance bills for Leonard Rudie. 3. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation (E. Walsh) Authorized cancellation of the balance (3211.11) remaining after Medicare payment from an ambulance bill for Eugene Walsh. 4. Budget Transfer - Audit Bill Authorized a budget transfer of 53,395 from the General Fund Contingency Account to cover the cost of additional work required of the auditors. 5. Planning Commission Resignation Regretfully accepted the resignation of Brian Sinn from the Maplewood Planning Commission and adopted the following Resolution: 92 - 06 - 53 JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Brian Sinn has been a member of the Maplewood Planning commission since April 23, 1990 and has served faithfully in that capacity to the present time; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has appreciated his experience, insights and good judgment, and WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy. without compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, he has shown sincere dedication to his duties and has consistently contributed. his leadership, time and effort for the benefit of the City. 2 6 -8 -92 i NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota and its citizens., that Brian Sinn is hereby extended our heartfel=t gratitude and appreciation for h i s dedicated service, and we wish him continued success in the future. 6. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1248 Cope Ave. (Keller Lake Animal Hospital) Reviewed and renewed for another five (5) years the conditional use permit for the Keller Lake Animal Hospital at 1248 Cope Avenue, 7. Conditional Use Permit t► Home Occupation License Review: 2194 Van Dyke St. - Launderville Approved a Conditional Use Permit and Home Occupation License for Ronald and Connie Launderville at 2194 van Dyke Street to operate a home towing business until November 1, 1992,. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7 :00 P.M. (7:016 P.M.), Assessment Hearing - Citywide Watermain - Project 90 -07 a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a change in the assessment roll for Project 90 -01. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. - Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. d. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Omar Olson, Jr., 1695 Abel . f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 06 - 54A CANCELLATION OF ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 91 - 04 - 51 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, adopted April 22, 1991, the special assessment for the construction of City Wide Water Main Project 90 -07 was levied against property described by property identification number 18- 29 -22 -34 -0046; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Council that the said assessment against the property described herein be cancelled in the amount of $3,875.00 and be re- levied in the amount of $500.00. (Resolution No. 92 -06- 54 adopting the new assessment roll.) 3 6 -8 -92 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessment for City Wide Water Main 90 -07 against the property described as 18- 29 -22 -34 -0046 in the amount of $3,875.00 be cancelled and re- levied in the amount of $500.00. (Resolution No. 92 -06 -54 •t, adopting the new assessment roll.) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ramsey County Auditor be and is hereby authorized to make the necessary changes in his records to properly reflect this action. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption 92 - 06 - 54B CANCELLATION OF ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 91 -04 -51 of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, ' adopted April 22, 1991, the special assessment for the construction of City Wide Water Main Project 90 -07 was levied against property described by property identification number 18- 29 -22 -34 -0047; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Council that the said assessment against the property described herein be cancelled in the amount of g P $3,875.00 and be re- levied in the amount of 5500.00. (Resolution No. 92 -06- 54C adopting the new assessment roll.) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the assessment for City Wide Water Main 90 -07 against the property described as 18- 29 -22 -34 -0047 in the amount p of $3,875.00 be cancelled and re-levied in the amount of $500.00. (Resolution No. 92- 06 -54C adopting the new assessment roll.) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ramsey County Auditor be and is hereby authorized to make the necessary changes in his records to properly reflect this action. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all i. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 06 - 54C ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of Citywide Water Main Improvement as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 90 -07, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 4 6 -8 -92 1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 20 Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 18 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 9 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 19920 To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 30 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself i n the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties made such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of t h i s assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all j. Mayor Bastian moved to direct staff to research the maintenance of, the .St..Paul Water Department line in Larpenteur Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 2. 7:20 P.M. (7:32 P.M.), Real Estate Sign Ordinances (2nd Reading - 4 Votes) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a change in the Real Estate Sign Ordinance. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. 5 6 -8 -92 d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents The following persons were heard Karen Christofferson, St. Paul Area Board of Realtors e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption. ORDINANCE N0, 703 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE REGULATIONS FOR REAL ESTATE SIGNS The Maplewood City approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances Section 1. This section changes section 36 -230 (Definitions) by adding definitions of billboard, ground sign and read estate sign and adding two new definitions as follows: Billboard: A sign that advertises a product, event, person, institution, activity, business, service or subject not located on the premises on which said sign is located. This definition shall not include an off -site real estate sign of sixty -four (64) square feet or less. Ground sign: A sign attached to or placed on the ground, rather than a building. Off -site real estate sign: A real estate sign that advertises a lot, group of lots or premises upon which the sign is not located. On -site real estate sign: A real estate sign that advertises the lot, group of lots or premises upon which the sign is located. Real estate sign: A sign advertising the sale, lease or rental of real estate. Section 2. This section changes section 36 -212 as follows: Sec. 36 -272. Freestanding signs. (a) A freestanding sign shall be at least ten (10) feet from a lot line, other than a street right -of -way. (b) A freestanding sign shall comply with the sight triangle requirements in section 29 -136. (c) A freestanding sign shall not project over public property or right -of -way, except where specifically allowed in t h i s chapter. Section 3. This section changes section 36- 307(12) and (13) as follows: (12) On -site real estate signs, subject to the following requirements: 6 6 -8 -92 a. For single or double - dwelling lots, there shall be no more than one such sign along each street that the lot fronts on. The maximum sign area shall be nine (9) square feet. Such signs may be on the right -of -way, but shall be no closer than eight (8) feet to the edge of a street or two (2) feet to a sidewalk or trail. b. For all other types of property, the combined area of all such signs fronting upon each street which bounds such lot or group of lots shall not exceed a ratio of one square foot of sign area for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of lot area. No one sign, however, shall exceed sixty -four (64) square feet. No person shall place such a sign on a public right -of -way. c. The sign owner shall remove the sign within seven (7) calendar days after the lease, rental or closing date of the real estate that the sign is advertising. d. A sold sign, used in conjunction with the for sale sign, may only be displayed for a total period of thirty (30) days during each listing contract. (13) Off -site real estate signs, subject to the following requirements: a. Off -site real estate signs of three (3.) square feet or less may be placed on the public right -of -way. No part of such signs shall be closer than eight (8) feet to a street pavement or two (2) feet to a sidewalk or trail. The City shall only allow such signs from 12:00 Noon until 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and from 6:00 a.m. on Saturday until 8:00 p.m. on the last day of a weekend. The City may dispose of any such signs that violate the requirements in subsection 36 307(13)(a). b. The City shall only allow off -site real estate signs of more than three square feet that advertise housing developments. Each housing development shall have no more than one such sign. The maximum area of any such sign shall be sixty -four (64) square feet. If the sign is for a for -sale development, the sign owner shall remove the sign when at least ninety (90) percent of the dwelling units approved by the City have been built. If the sign is for rental units, the sign owner shall remove the sign when ninety (90) percent or more of the units have been rented. Such signs shall not be on the public right -of -way. One on -site and one off -site temporary sign advertising a group of lots for sale within a subdivision or a group of houses for sale within a housing project along each street frontage which bounds such subdivision or project; provided that, the total area of such signs shall not exceed sixty -four (64) square feet, with no single dimension in excess of sixteen (16) feet. The display of such signs shall be limited to a six -month period. At the expiration of such period the applicant may request a further extension of time, otherwise the signs shall be removed. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 7 6 -8 -92 3. 7:30 P.M. (7:50 P.M.), 860 Burke Court (Popov) Code Variations Lot Division a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for Code variations and a lot division at 860 Burke Court, b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commi ss i ones. F i scher presented the Planning Commission report e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were-heard Mrs. Radmila Popov, representing the Piletich estate Ted Collins, Attorney representing Mrs. Popov and the Piletich children Mel Orwig, 2080 Arcade Gordie Grant, 2134 Arcade f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Bastian moved to direct staff to _prepare the appropriate resolution indicating Counc i 1 ' Is d e c i s i o n : Burke Court is to remain a private driveway. the deed restriction is dropped and the property division is approved subject to the Planning Commission recommendations. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Juker Nays - Councilmember Juker 4. 8:00 P.M. (9:16 P.M.), Home Occupation License: 653 Century Ave. No. (Leszinski) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a Home Occupation License at 653 Century Avenue North. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. C* Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Letter from John Armbruster, 631 Century Steven Leszinski, the applicant f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the home occupation. Motion died for lack of a second. 8 6 -8 -92 h. Councilmember Zappa moved to deny the request of Mr. Leszinski for a home occupation at 653 Century Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Councilmember Carlson 5. 8:15 P.M. (9:30 P.M.), Haae Occupation License: 2491 Stillwater Rd. (Tachenys) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a Home Occupation License at 2491 Stillwater Road. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. C* Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Chris Tacheny, the applicant f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g . Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the home occupation license for Christine, Tacheny to , operate a beauty shop at 2491 Stillwater Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Ms. Tacheny shall follow the City's.home occupation licensing requirements. She must renew her license annually, as required by Code. 2. The beauty shop shall meet all building code requirements, including handicap access. Ms. Tacheny shall apply for a building permit for all remodeling work. 3. The beauty shop may only operate Monday through Saturday, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 4. Ms. Tacheny shall only operate the beauty shop in one room of the house. There shall be no beauty shop activities outside the house 5. There shall be a smoke detector and a 2A -10BC wall - mounted fire extinguisher on the same floor of the house as the beauty shop. 6. All customers shall park on the driveway. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 6. 8:30 P.M. (9:42 P.M.), Alley Vacation: Between Edward, Frank, Ripley and Sophia (Reid) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding vacation of the alley between Edward, Frank, Ripley and Sophia Streets. 9 6 -8 -92 b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Fischer presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard. Randy Reid, the applicant Kent Rudeen, representing Mr. and Mrs. David Needham, 1785 Needham Theodore Roungou, 1789 Frank Street David Needham, 1785 Frank Street f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 06 - 55 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Randall Reid applied for the vacation of the following described alley: The west five feet of that part of the north -south alley in Block 8, Lakeside Park, Ramsey County between the North line of the South one -half of Lot 3, and the South Line of the North one-half of Lot 7. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on May 18, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on June 8, 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties. The South one -half of Lot 3 and all of Lot 4, Block 8; Lot 5, Block 8; Lot 6 and the North one -half of Lot 7, Block 8; all in Lakeside Park, Section 16, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is' in the public interest. 2. The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. 3. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 4. The City has been vacating unneeded alleys whenever requested. 10 6 -8 -92 5. It will keep the east fifteen feet of the alley available for public use. This vacation is subject to the retention of drainage and utility easement. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach, Zappa Nays Councilmember Juker HA-AWARD of BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Truth -In -Sale of Housing Ordinance (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption. ORDINANCE NO. 704 AN ORDINANCE READOPTING THE.TRUTH -IN -SALE OF HOUSING The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: Section 1. Article XII, Truth -in -Sale of Housing Ordinance, is hereby added to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances. Article XII. Truth -in- Sale -of- Housing Ordinance. Sec. 9 -235. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to promote decent, safe and sanitary dwelling accommodations. To help accomplish this, the City is requiring the disclosure of housing information and defects as a condition of the sale of housing. City inspectors may use t h i s information to require the correction of code violations. Sec. 9 -236, Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following terms are defined as follows: Adequate water flow: Enough pressure to maintain at least a one - quarter inch (1/4 ") diameter (pencil- sized) flow of water from each of at least three (3) or more plumbing fixtures at the same time. 11 6 -8 -92 Contractual agreement: An agreement, written or otherwise, between a buyer and seller for the conveyance of, or the intent to convey, all or part of a housing unit or residential building. A contractual agreement shall include, but not be limited to, an earnest money contract, deed or purchase agreement. Housing unit: A single dwelling, a double - dwelling unit, a townhouse unit, a condominium unit (as defined by Minnesota Statutes), or any other attached housing unit designed for the occupancy of one family. A housing unit shall not include a manufactured home. owner: A person having a vested interest in the housing unit or residential building in question. T h i s includes his or her duly-authorized agent or attorney, before a sale. Residential bu i 1 d i ng : A building containing one or more housing units. Sale: The conveyance of a housing unit or residential building to a new owner. Sec. 9 -237. Applicability. This article shall not apply to any newly constructed housing or residential building when the title i s conveyed to the first owner, except that no owner shall convey or contract to convey a newly - constructed housing unit or residential building without first providing to the buyer: 1. A list of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of all contractors and subc ontractors who constructed the building. 2. The items in Section 9 -238 (b) (2) (a, b, c, e, f, g, h and i ) . Sec. 9 -238. Truth -in -Sale of Housing Disclosure Report. (a) An owner shall not show a housing unit or residential building to a prospective buyer without publicly displaying and making available a truth -in -sale of housing disclosure report. This report shall be at the housing unit or residential building at the time of showing and within three (3) days of listing. A copy of the disclosure report shall be issued to the buyer before the execution of a contractual agreement. A copy of such report must be filed within 15 days with the City to be valid. A double filing fee shall be collected by the City if the report is not filed within 15 days. (b) A housing disclosure report shall be prepared by the City. It shall include: 12 6 -8 -92 (1) An evaluation by a City - certified housing inspector of specific parts of. the building and property listed on the housing disclosure report. This l i s t shall include, but not be limited to, items addressed in the housing maintenance, siding and junk removal ordinances. The City shall be responsible for determining whether there is an ordinance violation. (Z) A signed statement by the owner that includes the foil - owing information: a. Any damage to the building or its contents by flooding or sewer backup and any evidence of chronic water seepage of which the owner has knowledge. b. The nature, extent and cause of any seepage I or flooding of any portion of the property. c. Whether or not there are pending housing orders from the City about the property. d. Whether there is a homestead classification for real estate taxes payable. e. Any other known defects or problems that are not visible.. f. Any deed restrictions or covenants running with the property. g. Whether the property is subject to the City's pipeline, shore land or flood plain ordinances, h. The location and status of all known wells, including a map, stating whether the well is in use or abandoned and sealed. i. Whether the property is next to a high - voltage transmission line. If so, the disclosure form shall include the following statement: "The subject property is located near a high - voltage electric transmission line. Purchasers should be aware that there is ongoing research on exposure to a magnetic field generated by high- voltage lines. At this time no risk assessments have been made. (c) A truth-in-sale of housing disclosure report shall be valid for no more than one year from the date of approval by the City. However, if there is substandard maintenance or subsequent damage to the building, the Director of Community Development may require a new inspection. Sec. 9 -239. Limitations. (a) In making a housing inspection, the inspector shall consider any concealed facilities to be"4 1 equate. The inspector shall base his or her evaluation on the functional operation of the facility and the condition of the equipment that is viewed. No other warrant is expressed or implied. 13 6 -8 -92 (b) No one shall consider anything in a truth-in-sale of housing disclosure report to imply that a residential building or housing unit meets all minimum building standards. In addition, no one shall consider anything in the report to imply a warrant of the condition of the housing evaluated. The inspector warrants that he or she has used reasonable care and d i l i g e n c e in inspecting and evaluating the b u i l d i n g , Sec . 9 -240. Certificate of Competency, (a) No person shall fill out a truth-in-sale of housing disclosure report without having a valid certificate of competency. The City must issue the certificate of compet.ency_. The City w i l l only approve housing inspectors that have passed competency tests as truth -in- housing evaluators in St. Paul. The housing inspectors must submit certification papers to Maplewood from the City of St. Paul as truth-in- housing evaluators. The City of Maplewood must license each housing inspector that works in the City. Maplewood w i l l automatically revoke a housing inspector's license if it is revoked in St. Paul. The City of Maplewood may require the passing of a test that shows the inspector's knowledge of the City's housing code. The City may then issue a certificate of competency which is valid for one year. The City may issue renewals of all such certificates. If a certificate of competency lapses for one year or more, the person who held such certificate shall reapply to Maplewood for renewal of such certificate. No holder of a certificate of competency shall allow another person to use said certificate. (b) The City Council may revoke the certificate of competency of a housing inspector for cause. At least ten days before the hearing, the City shall send written notification to the mailing address used in the inspector's appl i cation . The notice shall l i s t the date, time and place of the hearing and of the specific reasons for the suspension. The Community Development Director may, at his or her discretion suspend the certificate of competency of a housing inspector pending a suspension hearing. Sec. 9 -241. Insurance. (a) No certificate of competency shall be issued or renewed without satisfactory proof of insurance insuring the applicant /evaluator. (b) The City shall be included as a named insured on the required insurance and any additional cost for including the City shall be at the expense of the applicant /evaluator. (c) The applicant's /evaluator's insurance shall remain in force continuously thereafter and no certificate of competency shall be deemed to be in effect during any period of time when such insurance and proof thereof are not also in effect. (d) Each applicant /evaluator shall have an individually -named insurance policy. 14 6 -8 -92 (.e,) The insurance policy shall provide coverage of not less than $250,000 per claim or $500,000 per year, aggregate, against any and all l i a b i l i t y imposed by law resulting from the performance of the duties as a certified Truth-in-Sale of Housing evaluator. Sec. 9 -242. Housing Evaluation Fees, The City Council shall set up a fee schedule by resolution for the filing of truth -in -sale of housing disclosure reports. .Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect on July 1, 1992. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 2. Sterling /Schaller Improvements: Project 87 -.45 Easements a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until June 22, 19920 Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 39 A.D.A. Survey a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Carlson moved to t a b l e t h i s i tem .until. July 13_1992 . Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Suburban Community Channels (SCC) Update a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Randy Olson, Suburban Community Channels presented a resolution in support of Suburban Community Channels (SCC) and provided an update on their activities. Councilmember Rossbach moved to waive the Rules of Procedure and extend the meeting until the end of the Agenda. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Councilmembers Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Juker Motion failed 15 6 -8 -92 Councilmember Juker . mo_ved to. waive the Rules of Procedure and extend the meet_ ng until 11 :15 Dm. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Counc i 1 members Juker, Zappa Nays - Councilmembers Carlson, Rossbach 2. Time Extension: 2076 English Street (Collins). a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. ,b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. C. Mr. John Collins spoke regarding this matter. d. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve a 45 day time extension. to remove the house and foundation and to regrade and 1 andscane the house site; declare the old house a public nuisance and .authorize City staff to have Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 3. 1993 -1991 Capital Improvement Plan (4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to set aside June 18 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 o.m.. for the Council and Manager to discuss.several issues. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes all c. Councilmember Zappa moved to table Item J -3 until July 13, 1992. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 4. Easement & Change Order: Project 90 -14 Panisch) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Zappa moved to direct staff to continue with the existing Win. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all Nays Abstain - 5. Harvester Area Storm Sewer and Streets - Schedule Public Hearing a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. 16 6 -8 -92 b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter.. No one appeared. E d. Councilmember Juker introduced the following Resolution and moved its ado t i on. : 92 - 06 56 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the city of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of Harvester Avenue Storm Sewer and Streets, City Project 90 -12, by construction of.storm sewer and streets,, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on. Harvester Avenue Storm Sewer and Streets, City Project 90 -12, by construction of storm sewer and streets is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according the MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,908,100.00. 3. A public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East county Road B on Monday, the 27th day of July, 1992, at 7:00 p.m., to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 6. Appointment of New Prosecuting Attorney a.. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Mr. Martin Costello spoke on behalf of the proposal. c. Councilmember Zappa moved to dismiss the firm of Peterson, Bell, Converse and Jensen as of July 1, 1992 and to appoint the firm of Hughes .. and Costello as Prosecuting Attorne .yfor the City effective July= 1992. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 17 6 -8 -92 K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE Lo COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. July 6 Meeting a. Councilmember Carlson requested the July 6, 1992 meeting be moved to July 9, 1992. b. Councilmember Zappa moved the July 6. 1992 meeting be re- scheduled for Jul _v 9. 1992* Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 2. Frank's Nursery Problems a. Councilmember Zappa requested staff to follow up on the request for Frank;s Nursery to clean up their area. I. White Bear Avenue Traffic Report a. Councilmember Zappa requested staff submit a report to Council regarding the White Bear Avenue traffic in the Maplewood Mall area. 4. Job Share Position a. Councilmember Juker questioned the procedure regarding the proposed job share position. b. Councilmember Juker requested the job share position be discussed at a meeting with the City Manager. 5. Volunteer Pool a. Mayor Bastian requested an update regarding the "Volunteer Group Network" that the City previously had. 6. City Project Review a. Mayor Bastian stated Project 90 -07 City Wide Water Main has created complaints, and that staff, residents, and contractors should be pulled together for a meeting to discuss this matter. b. Mayor Bastian moved to direct staff to research the way _ projects are handled - obtaining bids, planning a project, , completing a project, etc. Seconded by Councilmember Zappa Ayes - all 18 6 -8 -92 M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Ar i el & Highway 36 a. Manager McGuire stated construction had ad 1 already started. at Highway 36 and Ariel Staff has forwarded a letter to the Highway Department indicating the City's displeasure at the lack of communication regarding the construction of the Highway.36 /Ariel access. b. Council'member Zappa mov d the City send an invitation to a hi 4h -ranki n official of MnDOT to meet and. discuss the access at Highway 36 and Arie1. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes all N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 11:19 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 19 6 -8 -92 ..wr i .y+ 1 y� � CITY OF MAPLEWOOD } t1,1 , �.. �-h ,,'• tC`k p, 1830 E. COUN IT IZOAD 13 MAPI,EWOOL) MINNI4 SCYI'11 55109 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS f 12 -`0-4 June 15 1992 k ctilon by E Endorsed Modifie R ejecte d William M. Crawford, District Engineer Date Metropolitan District ` >r Minnesota Department of Transportation Room 120 Transportation Building 395 John Ireland Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Mr. Crawford: On a number of occasions over the years, the City of Maplewood has been requested to approve limiting the access to and from TH 36. In the early 1980's Mn /DOT proposed closures and traffic changes at English /Atlantic at TH 36. The changes were to improve safety and improve capacity. Maplewood reluctantly approved the proposal over the objections of local business owners. Indeed part of their concern has been realized since Perkins on the north side of TH 36 has been closed for some time. More recently closures occurred at Specialty Engineering, Hazelwood, and Ariel. Again over the objections of the public the Maplewood City Council went along with the closings, their concern with safety for the travelers on TH 36 has outweighed local concerns. You may well imagine the city council's concern when they discovered Mn /DOT is constructing a dangerous exit for westbound TH 36 near Ariel Street. The signals at McKnight Road provide sufficient access for the apartments at this location. It is very difficult to understand the reason behind this recent development. Mn /DOT's traditional posture has been to improve safety and capacity on TH 36. Equal Op porttmity Eniplo3•cr William M. Crawford Page 2 June 15, .1992 The city council requests your presence at their regular June 22 meeting. If this is not possible, please contact City Manager Michael McGuire at 770 -4525 for a mutually .agreeable date. Sincerely, Kenneth G. Haider City Engineer AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director xt�z RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: June 12, 1992 Action by Council: Endorse Modified..,._, Rejected.._„ Date It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: � g ACCOUNTS PAYA $ 431, 940.40 Checks # 23123 thru # 23170 Dated 6 -1 -92 thru 6 -09 -92 $ 114.059.01 Checks # 17348 thru # 17490 Dated 6 -22 -92 $ 545,999.41 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYRO 201, 866.66 1 Payroll Checks # 26817 thru # 269 Y 8 dated 6 -5 -92 .40,132.16 Payroll Deduction checks # 26986 thru # 27002 dated 6 -5 -92 $ 241,998.82 Total Payroll $ 787,998.23 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. lz Attachments nNANCE/APPRCLMS.AGN ITEM AMOUNT 530.00 29,677.26 20.57 2.19 .99 2.22 8151 3.75 2.12 12.00 56.88 2.46 5.54 5.63 1 Z30. 00 135.00 Z9045.76 153.52 15,673.31 362.80 334.28 369.74 901.89 6.63 19710-14 278.30 752.00 16,941.11 221.40 537-50 18,754.75 128.50 172.50 77,85 6 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 530.00 29967T.26 122.86 1 189235.39 19612.54 11710.14 752.00 16,941.11 221,40 537-50 18,754-75 128.50 172.150 69783.75 VOUCHREG 06/I2/92 11:14 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION 23126 541400 06/01/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES 23127 541400 06./01/92 MINN..- STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LICENSE FEES 23130 980700 06/01/92 LINDA ZICK PROGRAM SUPPLIES DELIVERY SERVICE SUPPLI'ES - EQUIPMENT POSTAGE SUPPLIES - EQUIP TRAVEL & TRAINING SUPPLIES - OFFICE TRAVEL & TRAINING PROGRAM SUPPLIES PRISONER CARE TRAVEL & TRAINING OTHER CONSTRUC COSTS 23131 541965 06/01/92 MINNESOTA COMMERCE DEPT UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 23133 530100 06/01/92 MEDICA CHOICE HCMA DEDUC PAY PHP INS DEDUCITONS PAYABLE HEALTH LIFE DENTAL INSURANCE A/R INSURANCE COVERAGE 23134 551100 06/01/92 MN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE HCMA PAY LIFE INS PAY HEALTH LIFE DENTAL INS A/R MISC 23135 501400 06/01/92 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE LTD INS 2 313 6. 180110 06/01/92 D. C. A. MONTHLY DENTAL PREMIUM. 23137 541400 06/02/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 23138 541400 06/02/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOT VEH LIC FEES 23139 120321 06/03/92 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 23140 541400 06/03/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEE 23141 541400 06/03/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOT VEH LIC FEES IV 23142 140400 061041 CLE OF DISTRICT COURT CNTY DRIV LIC FEES 23143 862685 06/64/92 TINUCCI RESTAURANT CATERING 23144 820235 06/04/92 SIMPLY DIRECT, INC. SUPPLIES - EQUIP -23145 510100 06/04/92 MAPLE LEAF OFFICIALS ASSN PAYMENT OF OFFICIALS ITEM AMOUNT 530.00 29,677.26 20.57 2.19 .99 2.22 8151 3.75 2.12 12.00 56.88 2.46 5.54 5.63 1 Z30. 00 135.00 Z9045.76 153.52 15,673.31 362.80 334.28 369.74 901.89 6.63 19710-14 278.30 752.00 16,941.11 221.40 537-50 18,754.75 128.50 172.50 77,85 6 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 530.00 29967T.26 122.86 1 189235.39 19612.54 11710.14 752.00 16,941.11 221,40 537-50 18,754-75 128.50 172.150 69783.75 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 2 06/12 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER , FOR PERIOD 06 i VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK i NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 23146 541400 06/04 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEES 293.00 293.00 23147 541400 06/04/9.2 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOT VEH LIC FEES 1T 1T 23148 720600 06/05/92 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 3 3 23149 190400 03/05/92 DEPT, OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LIC FEES PAYABLE 37.00 37.00 23150 190400 06105192 DEPT„ NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LIC FEES 346.00 346.00 , 23 1 5 1 541400 06/05/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIV LIC FEE 980.50 980.50 23152 541400 06/05/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOT VEH LIC FEES 13 : 13 23153 T22200 06/05/92 PUBLIC .. EMPLOYEE PERA DEDUC PAYABLE 10.9992. PERA CONTRIP 14,194.66 25,186.85 23154 341706 06/08/92 HERITAGE BAND F. I . C. A. PAYABLE ►, 5.55.89 _ FED INC. TAX PBL. 21 FICA CONTRIBUTION 9 41,051.95 23155 460300 06/08/92 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE 106.00 106.00 ' 23156 531650 06I0$/92 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN SEWAGE TREATMENT 16 1 811.00 _ � 161,811.00 } 23157 761750 06/08/92 R009 LOU LAND EASEMENT 31 500.00 3,500.00 , 23158 661T50 06/08/92 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILILTIES 25.42 UTILILTIES 21.42 UTILILTIES 126-3.6 173.20 23159 661T50 06/08 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 123 « 86 . UTILITIES 913.9' . UTILITIES 96.17 UTILITIES 286.50 UTILITIES 57.$7 UTILITIES _ 7.21 UTILITIES 25.61 UTILITIES 160.8 UTILITIES 254.27 1,926.30 23160 560100 06/08/92 MN STATE COMMISSIONER STATEINCOME TAX PBL. 9 r , 9 ` 23161 541400 06/08/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC. 19 ?2.15 19 i;.. 23162 541400 06/08/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 595.00 595.00 23163 180135 06/09/92 D.P.M.A. NORTHWEST CHAPER TRAVEL TRAINING 10.40 10.00 ' 23164 890800 06/09/92 U.S.P.C.A. REGION 18 TRAVEL TRAINING 100.00 100.00 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 06/12/92 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 23165 500650 06/09/92 M.R.P.A. SOFTBALL REGISTRATION 2 2 23166 6 _ a /..09/.92 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 7.79 UTILITIES 196.34 UTILITIES 94.83 UTILITIES 105.82 UTILITIES 223.53 UTILITIES 16.48 - UTILITIES _.. 13.29 UTILITIES 25,22 UTILITIES 9.64 UTILITIES 13.31 703.85 - 23167 540660 06/09/92 MILLS FLEET FARM OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 404.00 404.00 23168 881550 06/09/92 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO. REPAIR MAINT BLDG. 90.50 90.50 23169 541400 06/09/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC, 15,394.84 15,394.84 23170 541400 06/09/92 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC. 791 ,00 791.00 23128 "' 120325 06/01/92 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 5.10 j V A/R MI SC 29.62 34.72 23129 - 430300 06/01/92 KOKESH ATHLETIC PROGRAM SUPPLIES 123,68 123.68 23123 320500 --- --- ►6/01 /9'2 GROUP HEALTH INC* - - - - -_ -- -- .. - -- -- - - HCMA DEDUC PAY , ($ . HEALTH LIFE DENTAL INS 11 _ A/R INSURANCE CONTIN 622.85 15 302.57 17348 010290 46/22- -/'92 ANKERY KELL RICHTER a ASSOC. CONSULTING FEES 6. 788.28 6 17:349 0104 _ /2Z/9+2 . _._- ._.__- _ _ A .T & T_.._ TELEPHONE 67 , 40 TELEPHONE 12.48 _ 79.88 17350 010550 06/22/92 ACCURATE ELECTRIC REPAIR'S & MTNCE/ EQUIPMENT 57.10 57.10 17351 010575 06/22/92 ACE HARDWARE SMALL TOOLS 34.99 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 119.9 0 SUPPLIES - EQU I 27 .42 SUPPLIES - EQUIP 129.46 311.77 17352 02OTBO 06/22/92 ALBRECHT COMPANY OTHER CONST COSTS 490.92 OTHER CONST COSTS 133.69 624.61 17353 021000 06/22/92 AMER I -DATA SYSTEM COLOR MONITOR 29030.00 ' AMERIDATA F 787.00 2 17354 021200 06/22/92 AMERICAN FASTENER SIGNS & SIGNALS 125.45 125,45 17355 030660 06/22/92 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, INC, ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE 19622.82 11622.$2 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4 1 4 Qr_ -;/ 12/:x; 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK r REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ i CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17356 031100 06/22/92 APPEARANCE PLUS VEH MAINT 45 .00 VEH MAINT 24.00 ,, VEH MAINT 9.00 78.00 .i 17357 040915 06/22/92 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR & MAINT 90T.15 REPAIR & MAINT /VEH 368.77 1 , 275.92 _ ..._ .._.:.1` 17355 442600 06/22/92 ASSN. OF TRAIN OFFICERS OF MN TRAVEL & TRAINING 60.00 60.00 17359 060255 0 6/ 2 2/ 9 2 BFI TRASH REMOVAL TRASH REMOVAL T5. 48 i - 259-80 33 5.28 i 17360 060500 06122/92 BACNMAN S MISC. COMMODITIES 107.99 107.99 17361 060924 06/22/92 BALDWIN SUPPLY SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 25.86 25.86 ' 17362 061000 06/22/92 BANICK, JOHN PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.40 35.00 � 17363 061900 06/22/92 BATTERY TIRE WAREHOUSE MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 2 1 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 100.88 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 3 9 .90 ; SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 16.92 SUPPLIES - VEH 72.27 232.6T 17364 074100 06/22/92 BEACON PRODUCTS BEACON SPORTS PRODUCTS 698.32 698.32 17365 070114 06/22/92 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC - RAUios 51520,00 i ' 525.40 6,045. 17366 080325 06/22/92 BLACKSTONE, GA TRAVEL & TRAINING 72.25 VEH ALLOWANCE 117.26 189.51 1736T 0811-50 06/22/92 KOHL, JOHN PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.00 35.00 17365 090573 06/22/92 BRAUN INTERTEC ENGINEERING,INC OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 2 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 3 5 325.25 17369 101350 06/22/92 BUILDERS SQUARE MAINT MATERIAL 25.43 25.43 ;1A 17370 110470 06/22/92 CARLE, JEANETTE VEH ALLOW 20.80 20 17371 110480 06/22/92 CARLSON EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES - EQUIP 128.65 128.65 17372 110550 06/22/92 CATCO SUPPLIES - VEH 37.42 37.42 jF f 17373 120:21 06 /22/92 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 57.13 TELEPHONE 9.95 TELEPHONE 9.95 77.03 17 374 120 06/22/92 CELLULAR ONE TELEPHONE 43.76 43.76. VOUCHREG C=ITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 06/12/92 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17375 120350 06/22/92 CELLULAR ONE SALES SERVICE EQUIPMENT OTHER F 848.00 848.00 17376 140207 06/ZZ/92_._ CLEAN STEP RUGS RUG RENTAL 26.90 26.90 17577 150900 06/22/92 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FEES 83.76 83.76 17378 151350 06/22/92 COMPUADD CORPORATION REP & MNT /EQUIP' 435.00 REP & MNT /EQUIP' 90.00 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 25.20 _ SUPPLIES - EQUIP 37.83 EQUIP - PURCHASED 1 1,955.06 17379 152100 06/22/92 CONTINENTAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT/ EQUIP 20.00 20.00 • 1 T380 152400 ,06 / 2Z /9Z.__._ COPY EQU I PMEN.T..2 I.NC_O SUPPLIES - EQU I P 32.03 32.03 17381 170150 06/22/92 CURTIS 1000 SEWER BILL FORMS & ENVELOPES 2 Z 17332 180110 06/22/92 D.C.A. MISC.CONTRACTURAL SERVICES 2,174.10 2 17383 180900 .. 06/22/9Z_ _ _DALEY L - RAT... _ PLUMBING INSPECTIONS 1 1 1 658, 00 173£4 181852 06/22/92 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE SUPPLIES - VEH 12.50 SUPPLIES - EQUIP 56.15 SUPPLIES - EQUIP 32.50 101.15 0 17385 230225 0.6/Z2/92 E. K R QUEH - SUPPLIES-OFFICE _ 502.32 502.3Z 0 17386 230675 06122/92 EAST SIDE CARQUEST SUPPLIES VEHICLE 25.98 BOOKS 59.95 85.93 17387 240250 06/22/92 ELV I N SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES- EQUIPMENT 617. 1 847.52 _ IZ 14,389.67 17388 240375 06/22/92 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. INC REPAIR & MAINT/ VEHICLE 180.23 183.23 17389 250190 06/22/92 ERICKSON PLUMBING BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 566.00 SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 75.00 641.00 17390 270150 06/22/92 FLAIL- MASTER CORPORATION SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 81.84 81.80 17391 280461 06/22/92 RONALD FOSTER PROG REG FEES 10.00 10.00 17392 300504 06/22/92 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS CLOTHING 95.00 UNIFORMS AND CLOTHING 288.38 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 165.52 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 21.89 UNIFORMS & CLOTHING 77.61 648.40 17393 302530 06/22/92 CHARLOTTE GILLES PRQG REG FEES 20.00 20.00 40 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE b ` 06/12/92 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 0 L VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE" NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17394 310300 06/22/92 GOODYEAR TIRE COMPANY REPAIR & MAINT /VEH GDO REPAIR & MAINT /VEH $..00 REPAIR & MAINT / VEH 243.92 259 »92 17 395 310650 06/22/92 GOPHER DISPOSAL RECYLCING CHARGE 17396 310775 46/22/92 GOVERNING MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 9.00 9.00 ,; 17397 310$50 06/,22/92 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE TRAVEL & TRAINING 204.00 204.00 1739$ 3109.50 06/22/91 JOHN GOW PROG REG FEES 20.00 20.00 17399 320290 06/22/92 GRAYBOW- DANIELS CO. SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 12.00 12.00 17400 320310 06/22/91 GREEN VALUE NURSERY MAINT MATERIAL 200.00 200.00 17401 320525 06/22/91 GRUBER' S POWER EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MNT I EQUIP 98.30 REPAIR MAINT/ EQUIP F, _. _ SUPPLIES - EQUIP _ . -_ _. _.50.90 1.40 ' SUPPLIES - EQUIP 28.00 1$9.60 17402 330059 06/22/92 JAN HAAS PROGRAM REGISTRATION FEE 20.00 20800 17403 340110 06/22/92 HEJNY RENTALS, INC OUTSIDE RENTAL - EQUIP 30,00 i; OUTSIDE RENTAL -- EQUIP 35.00 65.00 17404 351300 06/22/92 HORSNELL JUDITH VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 51.72 31.72 17405 351400 06/22/91 HORWATH, TOM INSPECTION SERVICE 990,00 990.00 17406 390100 06/22/92 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #622 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 650.00 650.00__ 17407 400950 06/22/92 JEAN THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMPORARY RECEPTIONIST 3;4.00 :3$4.00 ' 1740$ 401520 06/22/92 JOHN'S WELDING SERVICE, INCr REPAIR & MAINT/ BLDG & GROUNDS 320.00 320.00 ' 17409 410310 06/22/92 JILL KAREL PROD REG FEES 20.00 20.00 17410 410420 06/22/91 KELLER ELECTRIC INC. FEES FOR SERVICE /LAMP 40.00 40.40 17411 420150 06/22/91 K I NKO' S COPIES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 14.8T 14-87 17412 430301 06/22/91 KNOWLAN'S PROGRAM SUPPLIES 30.99 30.99 ,; j 1741:3 430420 06/22/92 KNOX LUMBER MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 12$.00 12$.00 !, 1 17414 430800 06/22/91 KOKESH ATHLETIC: KOKESH ATHLETIC GOLF 821-60 J , PROGRAM SUPPLIES 199.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC GOLF 1 KOKESH ATHLETIC GOLF 700.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC GOLF 9.97.05 4, 126.05 1 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEW PAGE 7 06/12/92 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 i VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK: NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17415 440330 06/22/92 BARBARA KROLL SPEAKER FEE 50.00 50.00 17416 450140 !fib / "/9 .. LAB_.....E,AFE.T.Y _SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 676.24 676.24 1 i 1 17417 460575 06 LEE COLLINS LIMITED SUPPLIES - EQUIP 182.56 182.56 17418 461200 06/22/92 LESLIE PAPER SUPPLIES - OFFICE 161.20 ` 1 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 14.28 SUPPLIES "' OFFICE 191 « 20 1 ' I SUPPLIES - OFFICE 356-27 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 425.12 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 117.1: SUPPLIES - OFFICE 532,57 1 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 389.74 2 2 9 187.50 17419 470700 06/22/91 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS SUBSCRIPTION 16.00 16.00 1 17420 480500 06/22/92 LOFGREN JOHN R. VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 43,42 43.42 17421 500580 06/22./92 M.P.H« INDUSTRIES INC. � RADAR UNIT - 1 1 17422 501505 06/22/91 MAGLICH, GRETCHEN B. VEH' ALLOW 2.86 VEH ALLOW 19.75 PROG SUPPLIES 16.62 SUPPLIES -OFFICE 13.63 52.86 1 _ 17423 501900 06/22/92 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV TEMPORARY DATA ENTRY CLERK 239.76 239.76 M 17424 511600 06/22/92 MASYS CORP REPAIRS & MAINT /EQUIP 1 1 17425 520500 06/22/92 MCGUIRE, MICHAEL VEHICLE ALLOWANCE 400.00 TRAVEL & TRAINING 16.00 TRAVEL. & TRAINING 16.00 432.40 17426 530500 06122/92 MENARDS SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 18.36 18.36 17427 530630 06/22/92 MERLE'S CONSTRUCTION REFUND - BUILDING PERMIT 63.00 REFUND - SURTAX 1.80 64.80 17428 541956 06/22/92 MINNESOTA CITY /CTY MGMT ASSOC MEMBERSHIP 165.00 165.40 17429 542300 06/22/92 MINNESOTA MINING OFFICE SUPPLIES 162.18 1x2.1$ R 17430 570090 06/22/92 MOGREN BROS. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 160.01 SMALL TOOLS 79.90 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 55.60 2- 95.51 174:1 570950 06/22/92 MOUNT OLIVET RETREAT CENTER TRAVEL TRAINING 39.50 39.50 17432 580350 06/22/92 MR TIRE REPAIR & MAINT / VEH 66.19 66.19 0 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 06/12 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ ; CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17433 640550 06 NELSON, JEAN VEH ALLOW 23.97 23.97 17434 660905 06 /22 /9 NORTH STAR WIPER a INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - .JANITORIAL .194.75 1 174:35 661175 06/22/92 NORTHERN AIR CORP BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 795.00 795.00 17436 661600 06/22/92 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS , I NC . SUPPLIES -- VEH 69.19 69.19 �,. 17437 670950 06/22/92 NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMPANY INC PUBLISHING 2 2 17438 650075 06/22/92 O'NEILL,DURKE,O'NEILL,LEONARD LEGAL EXPENSE 304.60 304.60 17439 680600 06/22/92 OCTOPUS CAR WASH REPAIR MAINT/ VEH 15.00 REPAIR & MAINT/ VEH 105 REPAIR & MAINT 15.00 REPAIR & MAINT 7.50 i ` REPAIR & MAINT 7.50 150.00 174401 691600 06/22/91 OSTER, ANDREA POSTAGE 32.92 32 .92 17441 691500 06/22 OSWALD FIRE HOSE SUPPLIES -EQUIP 1,2.00 MAINT MATERIAL 23.50 35, 50 17442 692500 06/22/92 OWENS SERVICE CHEMIfiALS 105.59 17443 711210 06/22/91 PETERS, JILL UNIFORMS CLOTHING 27.15 27.15 17444 711345 06/22/92 PETERSON,DELL,CONVERSE &JENSEN PROSECUTION SERVICES 181.30 PROSECUTION SERVICES 5 .00 5 181.30 17445 711500 06/22/42 PHOTOS TO GO PROGRAM SUPPLIES 19.90 DEVELOPE FILM 15. FILM DEVELOPI 3.10 � DEVELOPE FILM 12.88 , DEVELOPE FILM 6.05 DEVELOPE FILM i l , 44 69.30 17446 712115 06/22/92 POLAR CHEVROLET GEO REPAIR & MAINT/ VEH 233.TT 233.77 , 17447 720580 06/22 POSITIVE PROMOT I ONS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 1 36 , 25 136.25 i 17448 720765 06/22/91 PREFERRED RISK CONSULTANTS FEE - CONSULTING 170.00 170.00 0 17449 741330 06/22/'91 RAMSEY COUNTY DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING 22.56 i f 5 :, !'''' DATA PROCESSING 1 .59 ,� DATA PROCESSING 2.12 DATA PROCESSING 66.50 92.77 17450 741555 06/22/91 RAMSEY COUNTY RTAC TRAVEL & TRAINING 250.00 250,00 17451 741700 06/22/92 RAMSEY COUNTY OUTSIDE ENGINEERING 231.62 231.62 � VOUCH.REG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 9 06/12/92 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 17452 742100 06/22/92 RAM CTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN. TRAVEL & TRAINING 75.00 75.00 17453 750550 06/ Z . REEVES PROGRAM REGISTRATION REFUND 12.00 12.00 17454 701423 06/22/92 RI SER, BERNAD INE SMITH PROGRAM _REGISTRATION FEES 20.00 20.00 174 55 761200 06 /22/92 ROAD RESCUE OXYGEN KITS 1 1 , 102.00 17456 77080 06/22/91 RYCO SUPPLY CO. SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 8 0 .30 80.30 17457 780200 06/22/92 S &S CRAFTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES 166.61 166.61 17455 750300 06/22/92 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 36.74 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 4.50 SUPPLIES -- OFFICE 139.94 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 128.11 309.29 17459 780402 06/22/91 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES - OFFICE 21,35 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 120.33 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 26.60- SUPPLIES - OFFICE 23.60 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 33.98 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 35.36 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 167.02 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 55.80 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 120.29 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 129.71 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 190.13 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 63.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 130.45 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 9.93 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 39.06 # SUPPLIES - OFFICE 72.09 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 179.66 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 185.69 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 53.83 SPS OFFICE SUPPLIES 637.50 SPS OFFICE 775.72 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 144.26 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 79.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.11 3 17460 780410 06/22/92 S.T.A.C. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 884.51 884.51 17461 780460 06/22/92 SAFETY KLEEN CORP PARTS WASHER 82.75 82.75 17462 780600 06/22/91 CONNIE SARNE FROG REG FEES 10.00 10.00 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I PAGE 10 06/ 12/92 11:14 VOUCHER /CHECK REGISTER FOR PER 0 ; VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR . ITEM CHECK NUMBER NUMBER DATE NA _ DESCR IP'T_IntJ AMOUNT AMOUNT 17463 $00075 06/2 SEARS SUPP EQU IPMENT 469087 469.87 17464 800400 0 6 / 22/92 SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWARE SMALL TOOLS 191.50 191.50 17465 820600 66/22/92 SNAP -ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS 7.13 7.13 17466 $31600 06/22f92 SPS OFFICE PRODUCTS 11734.72 OFfICE FURNITURE 1 170 Z$ 2 17467 840300 06/22 ST.PAUL BOOS STATION PROD SUPPLIES 30.27 SIGNS SIGNALS 15.99 � _._ PROG SUPPLIES 19.06 65. 32 r' 1746$ 840400 06/22/92 ST.PAUL CITY OF REPAIR & MAINT/ EQUIP 489.56 REPAIR & MAINT/ EQUIP 33.75 REPAIR & MAINT / AUDIn 212.75 756.06 17469 842454 06/22/92 STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING CHEMICALS _ _ _ -__ _ _ 141.89 _ 141.89 1 17470 843200 06/22/92 STEFFEN, SCOTT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 35.00 35.00 !, �. 17471 843537 06/22/91 STRATUS COMPUTER, INC. REP & MTNCE/ EQUIP 1 1 17472 843575 06/22/92 STREICHERS GUNS SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 93.00 UNIFORMS CLOTHING 577.50 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 91.00 761 «50 17473 854601 06/22/92 SUPERAMERICA FUEL & OIL 28.50 FUEL & OIL 48.66 SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 25.44 102.16 17474 $50$00 06/22/92 SWANSON, LYLE TRAVEL & TRAINING 50.00 50.40 17475 851575 06/22/92 SYSTEMS SUPPLY, INC. SUPPLIES - OFFICE 20.83 SUPPLIES - OFFICE 63.37 $4.20 17476 860080 46/22/92 T.A. SCHIFtKY & -SONS INC MAINT MATERIAL 98 «10 9$.10 17477 862667 06/22/92 TIERNEY BROTHERS, INC. SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 49.87 SUPPLIES - EQUIP 115.59 165.46 ; 17478 862675 06/22/92 TIGER SOFTWARE '' SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 56.85 56.55 17479 880501 06/22/92 TREADWAY GRAPHICS _ PR'OGRAM.SU'PAL1ES 18.75 18.75 17480 882300 06/ 22 / 92 TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE S - EQUI � 250. 2 50 . 00 17481 890640 06/22/92 U.H.L. INC. SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 199.53 199.53 174$2 900100 06/22/92 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORMS 120.78 UNIFORMS 36.85 157.63 Vwi✓ 0 VOUCHREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 06/ 12/92 11:14 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR PERIOD 06 VOUCHER/ CHECK VENDOR CHECK VENDOR ITEM ITEM NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 17483 900600 06 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES - EQUIPMENT 31.61 17484 910500 0� 1#ASi RiRBISH .....TRASH REMOVAL _ _ 42 .98 - 533.58 234.58 17455 910549 06/22/92 VAUGHAN,BARBARA PROGRAM REGISTRATION REFUND 15,00 ._.__._.U6/ /'4 VIRTUE PRINTING _ _ _ _ _ SUPPLIES - OFFICE 33.24 i SUPPLIES - OFFICE 7.24- 17487 941330 06/22/92 R. B. WHITACRE & CO. INC SMALL TOO 195.00 SMALL TOOLS 65.00 17488 943 _ ..- _........._ __..._ . _ PROGRAM REGISTRATION 15.00 17459 943501 06/22/92 JAN WISTRGILL PROG REG FEE 20.00 17490 970700 06/22/92 YOCUM OIL CO. GASOLINE 6 TOTAL CHECKS 0 0 0 0 PAGE 11 CHECK AMOUNT 31.61 j i 1,194.14 15.00 26.00 260.00 15.00 20.00 6,377.00 545,999.41 11 CITY Y Off' MAPLEWOOD 00 1 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARN INGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS - FOR THE CURRENT PAY F-IER I OD N U .E- R....- - -- -- C HF=C i DA T-ED--_ -. - P (4Y E . - -. - - - -- N N . ... C )6/(- - ) 5/92 DALE C A RLSON 267, 6 3 00 26819 9 06/_•_ }5/ 9tw GEORGE ROSSBACH 267w63 S 0 0 2 6821 2 ES21 . S / _ 5 E RANCr ES L J R 267,63 ( 0 6 / 05/92 MICHAEL A Mc U I E 3 286a 22 }» • «�, _ 06 / { �5/ % _ THERESE CPI-R L: SCE?-. - - _ I 1 0710 2 4) _. . C)(- 0S / •N 5 92 SAI BLACKSTONE 21 0 36. 93 0026825 0 6/05/92 G E TC:HEN MALL I C H 0 0268 27 0 6/05/9 2 LY LE S W A NSS N 1 10 7 1,45 C)(- )26828 06/05/92 LARRY J C UDE 297.32 C16J05J92 _._ . ANDRE A- J_ CASTE -R--__ 0026830 06 / 05 /92 WILLIAM M I K I S KA 18 5, 63 0026831 06/ 05/92 DANIEL E FAUST 2,; 369, 82 - (X 42.68. .- - - - -- - ;,} - 0-- / _ L. I DA---- Z-1 -K- _ -_ - - -_ _ - - -- - _ - _.._ .... - - -- - - - -- __._.. -. _ .. -- 9-#- 7 --- rC-.Y- -_ 0 i_ }2G► L.a,...+ 06/05/92 DEBORAH DEHN 642, 40 0026834 t . 06/05/92 RICHARD HANGSL EBEN 1 405m 30 li 1268-35- 06/05 MFITHEY 00 26836 06/ DELORES A V I GNALO 1 222a 9{_} 002683 06/ 05/92 BRUCE ANDERSON 1 j 034v 9 C)6/05/9 - ... ._. - -._ s } f N� s �T� = � C GL .. . • (1 •� R 0N - ...__.. - _.. _.-- ...__...__.- ....__..._._. -_._. ....._ -_ -. �.__..- __. _.. _..._ "... _ _ 7- .. ____._... 0026839 06/05/92 LUC I LLE E AUREL I LAS ice 1 0696 �. 6 0026840 06/05/92 BETTY D SELVOG, 120, 25 0 026 134 4--------- _ . _ ......_ - -- -- _" ,f , - ` -- -- -- - _. _ ._ . _ PAT R -1 GI -A - -F R C () 6 /05 /92 LO I S BE7 ii t 11235,70 0026843 06/05/92 C CNN I E L. KELSEY 579a92 11 CITY O F MA »EWCOD 00 02 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK NUt4BE - - -.. - CHECK DATED- PF4YE- --_ ..- 46 ()026844- LCRRA I - S- __ . - -- _ , 11-GN- 5 .... . ..... _ 0026845 06/ 05/9 2 PATRICIA A HE SL.EY 711 .34 0C 26846 06/05/92 / 92 CAROL ,SA GE I , 045 a 3O 0026848 (.-)6/C)5/92 SANDRA OLSON 748,85 0026849 06/05/92 MARY KAY PALANK 948w34 K E NNE T H` V, C OL L I E...' -- _ _ 2 3.59w 94. 00 26851 06/05/ CA ROL E L R I CH I E 1 096, 50 0026852 06/05/92 JOANNE M SVENDSEN 1. M fjr_ 2 6,8 5 4 06/ CAROL F MART I NS 1 j 44 0 0 »26855 06/05/ ANTHONY G CAHANES L,j 034,w 46 1 -46 -- 0026857 06/05/92 VERNON T STILL 1,522 0026858 06/05/92 DONALD W SKALMAN 1 83o w 18 4 - J2 68 5 q` - - — - - - - 0&/0 5 - /` . 92 -------------- €� AY M0 # �f`� - J - - - -M-CI R L - - .. - _ - - _ - - -- - -- _... - -- 't� 0026860 06/05/92 SCOTT L STEFFEN 1. 0026861 06/05/92 DAVID L'ARNOLD JO 00 26863 06/05/ JOHN C BGHL 1 i 762, 37 4b 00 26864 06/05/92 DALE K CL.AUGGN 1 546 R 87 � !}•� w' 'r YK .W a • .. a " a ` C a l "' -»'r � - - - - -- ._._ , _. _ s» • J • w _.__. I J • 1 _. •._... • i��r Lam' Y ___ �Yr���. j { { , � { { . - j � _ /?��'.��, r �- � -- _ ._. -_.. _.. . -.. w �I »/ 5 J 4b 0026888 06/05/92 JOHN H ATCH I ON 1 f 546. 87 0026867 06/05/92 JAMES YOUNGREN , 8 1 R 8 fX-e68 69 T E 0026869 06/05/92 KEVIN RABBETT 1 1 l0w 60 0026870 0 06 / 05 / 92 THOMAS J S Z C Z EPA GK I 1 889. 73 + " CITY OF MAC {LEWOOD 0003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS - FOR THE CURRENT PLAY PERIOD { . }fw) 0 6/ 05 /9 2 CABOT V WELCHL I N 1 0 06 /05/ 9 RICHARD J LANG 1 3 5595 4 9 mow!AM PfZ 1••/[ ♦A � - - -._- 0 0 M ICHAEL RYAN 1 622. 3 0026876 r 6 0G /05 / 92 MICHAEL J HERBERT 1 825 r 6 l C)(- - )26878 06/05 GREGORY L G TAF NE 1 0026879 06/0 5/92 RONALD D BECKER 1 03. 11 0{w }26881 06 DERREL.L. T STOCKTON 002 6882 06 MAUL G PAUL_CS— J , 1, r 0026884 06/05/92 FLINT D KA R I a 1 58 9 n 42 00 26885 # }G/ 0 / 92 STEPHEN HEINZ f 5613m 21 . J - - - -- » w fw.- - - - - - -- --- - - - -_. _.. _ .l,.. "» - .w J - -_ -__ - __.---- .- __- . - - - - -- 'J 7 - - ` •--- -__._•_____--- -_._.. __.._. _._-------- .._'_"'------ ..._._.._. _._____ .._ - -- .. ..___ - - - -4 - - w7 -. - -- '-. -- 0#w 26887 06/05/ DAVID M G RAF 1 00 . 26888 0 6 /05/ 9 2 DAVID J THO ALL.A 1 1639.25 ' M M "• - Cw )026 0 6/05/92 ROBERT E VGRWERK 66 0m7 6 0026891 06/05/92 JOSEPH A BERGERON 1 1 7 7 1. 1 9 0 026 893 893 •w }G / •w }5 / 92 JON A MELANDE R 1 0 026894 06 /05/92 SARAH SAUNDE RG 1, 020„ 50 0 026896 0G / 05 / 92 DUANE J WILLIAMS 1, 499. 22 0026897 •w 6 /05/92 JANET L. RABINE 1, 2 98.42 i CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 00(__)4 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTI CHECKS C. KS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD NUMBE- - -- CHECK DF4-rE - PIAYEE - - - -. -- - . - - - -_ _ _ _..- ._.__...- -.._- -- - _ . _ Aplo : t4T_ __ -- - 0026899 06/05/92 SCOTT K BOYER 1, 0026900 06/ CAROL NELSON i j 688. 27 .. 0 0MM »K »I' 0. l . - 06/05/92 J OSE P• • { AMA I 1.• 1____. _. - -- .. _.. .. _ _ _ ...__..- _ _ .. t 06 05 92 GWC NDOL N SELL f 7 * i 0 0026903 06/05/92 JILL PETERS 1, 117a 14 0026 905 06 JUDITH WEGWE RTH 729 0026906 06/05/92 KENNETH G HAIDER 2 0026907 ` ... 06/05/92 JUDY - M Cif fLEBEC 1 I 226rir al » �N� i»» lM j✓ N� �M� "».f / �M� W f WILLIAM P• 1 I ANN • E R 11 303, 9 0 0 0269 0 06 GCS ALD W MEYER 1 280. 57 y' 0026911 06/05/92 BRYAN NAGEL 1, 171 a 46 00 269 1 2 06/ 05 / 92 DAVID P LUT Z 1 222 a 11 002691 06/0 5/92 JOHN SCHMC#OCK 1 199, 9, 70 i 002691 06 f+ 05 / 92 RONALD L F R BERG 1, 248. 8 '.")0 06 /05/92 WILLIAM C CASS 1 7 9 00. 50 0 026919- _ _ 06 -/ 05 92 _ _ TODD -- -- 42211, -- -- d 00 26920 06 / 05 / 2 RANDAL L I NDBLOM 1 0026921 06/05/92 JAME G EL I AS 1, 542. 75 06/05/ s 0026923 06/05/92 DENNIS L PECK 1, 002 924 06/05/92 WILLIAM P R I EBE 11761,99 mw CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD ~~ . ---�C-K- CHECK- ]DATED---pAY ---- - 9 , _.-���---- —��E-- --------f,���— ` 0026926 06/05/92 WALTER M GEISSLER 1,502.04 0026927 06/05/92 THERESA METZ 1,,830.15 ^ `- 0026928— - �HP+- R -���—�—'�--- -- ��'42— ` 0026929 06/05/92 ROBERT D ODEGARD 2,124.27 , 0026930 06/05/92 LOISJ BRENNER 1,314.83 0K6/05/92 A-HR8MMEL--' ----- ---- ------- 568~ 25�-- , 0026932 06/05/92 PAULINE STAPLES 1,866.10 --'---------------- 0026933 ----- -' - ` -------------- 06/05/92 ------------------' LUTHER JONES -- ---` ----- 41.60 _ _ -MAURG(4RET'HUN[AE-'---- --- -- --- -- 9�� i � 0026935 '.)6/05/92 ROBERT S ANDERSON 1 _ 0026936 06/05/92 DENNIS P LINDORFF 1,E22.10 .c WILLIAM- GARRY-------- .^ 0026938 06/05/92 ROLAND B HELEY 1,245.30 0026939 06/05/92 MARK CARB 184, 00 00 - ----- - - - -- 5����---- --' 06/0 MAA�4- A- MARUEAKA- - 0026941 06/05/92 JAMES SCH%NDELDECKER 1 0026942 06/05/92 DAVID WIEDL 429.9@ ^ ----- --��W� -- --------1��-' 0026944 06/05/92 MYLEG R BURKE 1 c - 0026945 06/05/92 JOEL MAHLA 87. 75 — -ST GE R.ZINGE-R--- ---� --���- `. 0026947 06/05/92 DANA BREEDING 241.65 0026948 06/05/92 JAY BRBNNER 400.80 .' ~z —002694-------'�� -CF�����---------�--1��'�— ^ 0026950 06/05/92 KAYLENE PETERSON 224.00 ^, .- 0026951 ___�_ 06/05/92 MICHAEL COLVIN 110.25 9 lqhl CITE` CE MAPLEWOOD 0006 EMPLOYEE G ROSS EARNI AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CD CHE C - . DATED. - PAYEE - - - - -- - y ROBERT CASP BELLL - - - -- - 2 1 0026 953 06/05/ CARP RAHH 224 i 00 0026954 06/ 05 /92 ROY C WARD 41 9 s 02 ' 6 06 J A NE T GRE A L 8 0 0269 57 06/05/ JEAN NELSON 569 M iM1j./.y. 06/05/92 JUDITH A HORSNELL 534a 17 ( . 4 6 - / . 05 - / 5-/ 92. - -- -- -- ._...... -I Tt"f.. 00 26962 C)6 / (- - )5/ 92 KATHLEEN M DOHE RT Y 1 182 90 00 963 06 / 05/ 2 MARIE BARTA f 1 0 i i 14 _ -. 0026965 ji 06/05 92 NANCY l MI SK 487 i 6 0026 966 06/ 92 JOYCE L L I V I NGSTCH 593 02 _ ._._-. _ T�"""TT - _ . - -- ----. .._.._.--- ----- --�'"�-���_ -_ w't _- __ -___ _.._.__ _. _. ___ .� - 7w �tt�iw - - - -. _...__.. _----- ._._._. ._.... .__-- •-- - - - - - -- -. ___...- --- - -- -- .. ,w swf -► 0026968 06/ KENNETH ROBERTS 1 +� 0 026969 JV 06/ 05/92 THC AS C EKSTRAND I 648* 3� _ f .____ i' T y' 1My •yT _.�_.____-- .._ -...__ ...- .__... (• 1M �w� •~ __._.__.. -._. _.___- _____...._ i i l/ iM F -- l ST 1 - 0026971 06/ 05/92 NICHOLAS CARVER 1, --- __ -_. _. � � � �� � � __- - _ E DWPiRD- A- - -NADEAU .. - 1 00 26 9 t �w•6 / 1«J GEORGE W MULWEE 1 7 � f �rw • w � 9T w� 'w� 002 975 06/05/92 LAVER NE S NUTESC � -- 1171 0 02 977 06/ D AVI D B EDSO # i 335. ?6 J 00 269 78 06/05/9 DAVID GERMAIN 1 242 9O lqhl CITY OF MAC {LEWOOD 0007 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD _._._.CHECK -. - -. _. N _ 1 002 06/05/92 ELIZABET J WEILAND 876m, 08 1 �lyl N.M (p�/�y�� T V I D... _. -__... ..- e r ) ■y. .- 1 "M�!M�.» »_- ___... __.._.. -_.... 7( .![y»y} , f ' •. { -...• •YMOIMI - _._...�- __.__..._. -_._.. _.^_.__�___-- -..... • `t !yy- _. ._.. «f'.._ -- -.._. 002 983 V 0 I D 06/05/92 MN ;STATE COMM OF REVENUE 9 325 u 45 002698 VOI 06 / 05 / 92 FIRST M I E OTA (FICA) 9 V 0 - I D f } } - _ PIJB . IC MP RET - I ;EMEP4 ' - - _. - _5 1 .105. - _ 00 26 986 86 06 / 05 / 92 I CMA RETIREMENT TRUST- 1 0 1 644 0026 987 V0 I D 06/ FIRST MINNE 318 ---- 002G9 - 8& V..0 .I D- _ 0 6 - /05/9 2 CITY O MAPLE WOO 06/05/92 CITY & COUNTY EMP CR UNION 26, 970m 00 _ 002699 0 VOID 0 / 05 / 92 UNITED WAY OF ST w PAUL AREA 113s 06 -/ ::s `' - - - - -- COMMERCIAL- (. - W)2699 2 ( O / 05 / 9 2 MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM 0 286,00 - #« 0269 V 0 I D 06 92 PUDL I C. E Pw RETIREMENT ASSOC. 1 5 a 50 •.. .. ,... ... E .r f w. .. r t � t � .r r -•ti t r. �' 0 5 06 / 05 / 2 METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOC 20,00 r •w } 026 v °"` 06 0 92 MNs MUTUAL. LIFE INS. 19-3988 2 73s 00 •mot c A I I - 0 026998 V OID 06 / 05 / 92 PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 41 5n55 o026999 V 0 I D 06/05/92 PUBL I C E ft RETIREMENT ASSOC 5j 691 x 31 4 . ice.: � #�rS ti�7 �,��� ... _ � � � ; � , - -- - -- -- - -- - -- — __ _ _ �f a t 0 002700 1 06/05/92 L, E, La So 2000 00 �' r j - �- i �w �w� i».. i �I�� � Mwe ..�' 06/0 � RAM CO SUPPORT C OLLECT 40 0027004 V 0 I D 06/05/92 FIRST MINNESOTA (FIC 9, 55,x. 38 _- IL 00E7005 U 0 I D 06/05/92 PUBLIC EMS{ RET I BE E T ASSOC 5 _..�_ -�-. ...._ .. .. .. ...... ... _.. ..._. ___ ��__._- _. _. _ - -- - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0008 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROL.L. DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD Dl T E 1) - )027007 V Q I D 06/05/92 PUBLIC EMS; RETIREMENT ASSOC 8 536. 85 GROSS EARNINGS AND DEDUCTIONS 322 1 _ l! l - n - v 0 AGENDA ITEM MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager .Action by Council: FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Project 90-07—Assessment Error DATE: June 15, 1992 Endorse Modif i e cl��. .,..� Rejected Date_.__.� The, property owner for Parcel 10- 29 -22 -24 -0013 has encountered a problem with the assessment for Project 90 -07. At the assessment hearing .last year Vivian Frid, one of the owners, made a verbal objection to the assessment. This is contained in the official minutes. Ms. Frid claims a written objection was filed at the meeting. There is no reason to believe an objection was not filed, however, no objection has been found in our records. As a result, no notice was sent to the property indicating a resolution of the assessment question. The Frids thought the city was still considering the appeal. When the Frids tried to pay their taxes this year the assessment appeared along with a substantial interest charge. Since the city had not responded about the assessment appeal the Frids were surprised by the interest. Since there obviously has been a mix up and the Frids have apparently attempted to follow the process, it is recommended that the Frids be given the opportunity to pay the original principle amount without interest in the next 30 days KGH I F%-o3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Termination LOCATION: Kennard Street, North of Seam Avenue APPLICANT: Korridor Capital Investments, Inc. PROJECT: Mineral Extraction DATE: June 11, 1992 INTRODUCTION ,action by Council: ::dors e d�„�.... odifecl,, ReJ ecte Date The City Council should end the conditional use permit to mine the land north of Beam Avenue and west of Kennard Street. The applicant has finished mining this site. BACKGROUND November 13, 1989: The Council approved the CUP, subject to the applicant meeting fifteen conditions. November 15, 1990, February 24, 1992 and May 11, 1992: The Council reviewed the CUP. On May 11, the Council required another review on June 8, 1992 to consider ending the permit. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 4. conditional use permit. This resolution ends the mb\mining. mem. go b -3 (3) Attachments: 10 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Resoluti 61 r�3 1 1 av 1 j 1 2 3 • • h N LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 Q N f I � P • • ST �• ,.• N•.••.. M..•... • 1 �•� go . 40 •� O .... 440 0 •• • w_•.••• .� • •N.. ♦r M•oMah-0% do 4b4w4w 41 , • • • . 4w 04P 0 • t. _. • ' t . • � .�� .. •...ter � `� •000.0.. »_00.00 ' �sniff usages mass now s a a a s. 0.0 a UAR6 FA ., s s • = ' 4.4t •C.. St. John's Hospital ; 4 0 s T. so Northeast s _ _ ``• D 4 ! w mo t. � .•,+ �..• N / � .,. � w - r St. ' Peul Eye Cli � r = 1 Avr 1v �.. '� � � `� %fit' !� f • Maplewood Professional Building • rlr C ►iw �t�M �,vt. �11�i0 • •1 • M►a ;ssa marsU.-M s pu- IF BCBM • � � 1 • PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 .- Attachment 2 Q N .."t RESOLUTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TERMINATION WHEREAS, on November 13, 1989, the City Council approved a conditional use permit to mine the following escribed property: g : p p Y The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the West 727.75 feet as measured at right angles to the West line thereof. Also except that p art of the South 660.00 feet as measured at right angles to the South line lying East of the West 727.75 feet as measured at right angles to the West line thereof. Subject to and together With easements of record, if any. WHEREAS, the applicant has finished mining this property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council ends this conditional use permit, because the applicant has finished m . pp lning this property. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on June 22, 19920 4 Attachment 3 F Y MEMORANDUM .Action by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Endorse d...,..._.,_... SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Time Extension Modifi ed__.____.. PROJECT: Beth Heights Addition DATE. June 12 19.9 2 Rejected Date INTRODUCTION Mr. Chad Lemmons is requesting a time extension for the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat. This plat would create 52 lots on the north side of Linwood Avenue at Sterling Street. (See the maps on pages 2, 3 and 4.) Mr. Lemmons is requesting this time extension because of one of the conditions for plat approval. This condition requires that the City award contracts for the Sterling Street improvement project or that the developer connect to the sanitary sewer in Linwood Avenue. Mr. Lemmons wants to use the Sterling Street sewer. The City Engineer expects that the City will construct Sterling Street this summer. BACKGROUND June 12, 1989: The City Council approved the Beth Heights preliminary plat subject to nine conditions. June 11, 1990: The Council approved a one -year time extension and revised the June 12, 1989 conditions. June 24, 1991: The Council approved another one -year time extension and again revised the conditions. DISCUSSION The Council should approve this time extension. The delay is because the City has not yet completed the Sterling Street improvement project. RECOMMENDATION Approve a one -year time extension for the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat, subject to the June 24, 1991 conditions, jl\memo34.mem go \B- 3 (12-28) Attachments: 19 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 39 Preliminary Plat (1) MARNIIE ST T. 28 k Ft 2-211. S.11 l '3-12 .S. 14s.15 2I ') CtJRRIE CT )VALLEY VIEW CT (3) LAKEWOOD CT 9 Ca 4 O 3 O 3 LOCATION MAP 4 Attachment 1 C R•E!kTV1EW ' �� a, - FORE 3RD. A, D). , FOREST , p,U r y T � 0 ,�T1�,S'S� 4,t U 10 w o a VISTA HILLS 2 PART OF COMMON a �9 • 2 _ AREA Iowa � 0'9 0 � � :' von a o (�L; 4 PARK .�� W ., w WNHOMES AT COPY CRESTVIEW FOREST TO E TA;LS rMk=wwow ' YO iiL 9v �z rqp �_ .c.• •: ►3.6:6•: : r;:• 0 1 ,•: i .• ; . ty:t:Y. i G � i i 3 �. 0 i o •� i h. 7 1 `O AA 4 .................................. ........... OUTH 2 S h 3 6 S .� �r �. 5 , a -rs i 9 n J46) 4 1 a� 4 6 ( N �• i 2 9. go. 9 C 0 5 9� H �• . y. . AQV �` W O OD R 8 a � r 3c :: 8t Qi. qc o 0� Ol c.0 c 1 � A N D , 1 r n 16 42 (4 , 8 •v' 9 �1 r D c� 0 1. ." q3 IOSL9 9r � p. - N �O �'i43i I� (44) a� .... ................... ................. ......................... ........ .... 0 d 20 i h WA T ...... ........................ .. ................ .$ ....... ........ .......... ........................................... o ..................... . .............. 90-02 I ! 4 r ................ :.::• e i . •: . .:• r a•: ............................. } '•� ' ;.; , POLICE SHOOTING T T R 0 L 0 .. :� D 9 4! 2 v 5 C p �. .............. ..................... 0 4.7 4 ate RANGE N 2 1 � G E �S c '( . o` S r: N v N N e� :•�s �' 2c • :� 3 Q` w V � N Or i R1 C ■ O'.: T LOT E 1 .. ." L I NWOOD AVENUE AL" ARJRA- co 91 Lo - 2 Y N ^� c 2 578 2616 as *c 2516 F I i— ! w -'� OUT LOT 18 0 TcTA� _ 6�.3P se, 1 , I , r C�,a•.' r 0 0 o ' 1' ' � i PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N G C F Revise Preliminar Plat of: 0 2 BETH HEIGHTS ADDITION . f v/it, N 1 4 'r -. N0 Owner. , , - - , I . . . t CHAD LEMMONS A 14 N. V 4.1 13 0 ;trw /W xx/od 0 4 ct s 4 %. , love. t f 10 §0- ode 4v/ Z \'A 'Oo L6 1K f /1 r * � • ,/"- 40 -0 F, r'7 • �4 1.1/s '1, 1, Y % N � IT5 %N Z Developer KENT W. JEFFERSON ( Jefferson Homes 4530 Hi 61 White Bear Lake, Minnesota SS 110 Tel: 429-5309 Z k- r LEGAL DESCRIPTION: /0 r-A 5 a All of the Southw oz . 0 est quarter of the Southeast q uarter of Elf V. e 1 Section 12. Township 28. Ran 22, Ramse Count Minnesota. va if 11 1040 1040 N ff 1� lip 10 A 01 18 00 so 9 3 N N 0 �T K I A I A. LIT X � 1 1 .11 1 , - % -4 % OA LANE ba 1 1 1 1 1*0, -i- First I %, I -V 9 fit, VIO . COD ........ - v to I I tell - N 0 it t U P, Ir % I 1 1% -, - — , -,- R! 1040 if , --N -EF f \ W I - - , - - , A - '00-. 104 0 At \ \V\ % 9 1 1 em It 105 1030 E Z. a 102 0- \�`� \ �\ ' tOS ' ".-. 1 :� 4 *_� ` ' ; io VZ /" %f ��� �\� ( /� // f� �_�_— �` ` 1050 Z.710 ---1040 r 7-103 ?.0 100 Feet -j 10 ID30 Ile, Scale: 1 Inch X irl I j X 110 ! % N A % %4 TY PICAL SETBACKS I % C+ X>`tI - • J P1 I # I A� C+ Q ap l Pip • 0 CX 10 L I I - At 1040 0 % 1040 % 11 �; v A N, N \ \ 445 `Z J .", (D It 70 2=1 % U.J zi- J 103 I JOSO 0 Fti� 1020 Z- "- — -'' 0 Jose - . / � _ _ _ _ ZtL-!Lv-- - 1010 \ - P 0 Pa -r- Z-� --Z1 i:e /to- -41 r-- rx—, I V t ,�z 1047 NJ \0 6 j o gwi =�Ix. rr4re r - 0 It %0 t we Z Z "A', 2 40 Z.- ILINWOOD /4 Ox • ,0 '. 10 40" \0 0 40 a a 6 Z ) IL AVY 0 'Ify se zl! %0 n o p r-zs, e. It Ihsr Low *Mj-.ft WW S- OW •'s Of UkV4&d& F. C RUD I Soys' INC, LAND SURVEY099 mo * lexinVbn Aw. Alf. CirCl Pint f A,& ntsvld 5SO14 Telephone AWS55C r ___ ___ 30*10W MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager Aotion by Counad I ; FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Pl anner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Time Extensi En,dorse PROJECT: Mark' Nature Haven Modif ie DATE: June 12, 1992 Rejecte ,.�._. Date INTRODUCTION Mark Schweitzer, of Pacesetter Property Management, is requesting a one -year time extension for Mark's Nature Haven preliminary plat. This plat would create thirty lots north of Carver Avenue between Dorland Road and Interstate 494. (See the maps on pages 2 3 and 4 and the letter on page 5.) Mr. Larry Liles of Pacesetter told me that they are now completing their financing plans . He will ask for final plat approval after they find someone to finance their development. BACKGROUND June 11, 1990: The City Council approved Mark's Nature Haven preliminary plat, subject to nine conditions. June 24 1991: The Council approved a one-year time extension. DISCUSSION The developer owes the City about $500. This money is for work done by our engineering department on the preliminary plat. If Pacesetter does not pay by the Council meeting, the Council should deny this time extension. The developer would then have to start over with a new application. RECOMMENDATION If the developer has not paid his bill by the June 22 meeting, the Council should deny this time extension. If he has paid, approve a one -year time extension for Mark -as Nature Haven preliminary plat, subject to the June 11, 1990 conditions. jl\memo37.mem gob -3 (24 -28) Attachments: 110 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Letter T.28KFL22W' S! Ifs. 2 S- I S.13 (I) CURRIE CT (2)VALLEY VIEW CT (3)LAKEWOOD CT t 43 0 VERk1� ("t.kS R22W. s2a�s24 (o � `s ze'sas j Q3 0 0 3 i 3 r rver 511' LoAre �r 1 WASH /NGrON CO LOCATION MAP Q N 2 Attachment 1 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N PA all N v Its • � � 0/II ..� v � N a a� r 8 m v J jp• Its S TREET' 04 IGO WOOL— N N } V M - OR a� Ex � 8 � � v v y � !1 ` V •' 1 r HO Iss � 1 .. � `• 1 .� J M 8 � n MOW 1 ~ 129 r-- VVV Z 3 ^ 8c a in D Z z j o M � I. N CARVER AVEUVF- al R t � �M� � ����� *� a -� a r► �N , loo 4 Attachment 3 M ✓ y ; 43 $06 n � T ' A L% " M '► 8 LL ^ N o & 06 r � o 1 M v K' n PA all N v Its • � � 0/II ..� v � N a a� r 8 m v J jp• Its S TREET' 04 IGO WOOL— N N } V M - OR a� Ex � 8 � � v v y � !1 ` V •' 1 r HO Iss � 1 .. � `• 1 .� J M 8 � n MOW 1 ~ 129 r-- VVV Z 3 ^ 8c a in D Z z j o M � I. N CARVER AVEUVF- al R t � �M� � ����� *� a -� a r► �N , loo 4 Attachment 3 PACESETTER � PROPERTY MANAOFAdENT, INC. -- May 19, 1992 Kenneth Roberts City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Mr, Roberts: We request that the City Council renew the preliminary plat approval for Mark' Nature Haven. Enclosed you will find a check for $57.00 for the renewal fee. Sincere y Ma k A. Schwei zer 5 Attachment 4 4 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Time Extension PROJECT: Highwood Estates No. 2 DATE: June 12, 1992 INTRODUCTION Action by Council:, Endorse Modif i e d.,. .. -.- Rejecte ]gate Roar Development., Inc. is requesting a one -I year time extension .for the last phase of the Highwood Estates No. 2 preliminary Plat. This phase would create 42 lots on a new Southcrest Avenue, south of Highwood Avenue. (See the maps on pages 2, 3 and 4.) BACKGROUND April 9, 1990: The City Council approved the Highwood Estates No. 2 reliminar plat subject to eighteen conditions. p Y P June 24, 1991: The Council approved a one -year time extension, subject to meeting the April 9, 1990 conditions. September 23, 1991: The City Council approved the final. plat for Highwood Estates No. 2. This final plat includes 54 of the 96 lots in the preliminary plat. DISCUSSION The developer started construction on this project in the fall of 1990. Later this year, the developer will request final plat approval for the last phase. RECOMMENDATION Approve a one -year time extension for the Highwood Estates No. 2 preliminary reliminar plat, subject to the April 9, 1990 conditions. mb \memo35.mem go \b -3 (13 -28) Attachments: 10 Location Map 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat T.28N,R22W. $ A 1 i&12 ss. .4 �� (1) CURRIE CT (2) VALLEY VIEW CT (3) LA KEWOOD CT 0 3 0 Z 3 �� r [oks 43 OVER �o CIR y � 44 4p -ttM R22VL 23 S24 94 . �J 43 1 ;1 R,aus�r :co J WASHINGrON CO LOCATION MAP ............ ............ ............ ........... ............ ........... ............ ........... ............ SITE Q N 2 Attachment 1 ab Aftd& vAv. am trio) 37 176 2 6 1 v • r....;.w--vHIGHW00D AVENUE a A 1111115 �Iw - .. L4.0 S. 7 5'7- 174.0&! - i x . ............ 14 *67. 13 1 (w) ................. ....... .......... X-X-X-X-:-:-:- ..... ...... :H IGNA 0 D w 4( 2 5 ) 40, ......... 3.54 1 2 1 1 (36) A J 140 -X-X . ....... X Al 3 (to) 3 (31) 10 3 5) . ....... all W.3 7.7 1 J _ 140 4 440 4 oi 01)q 1 )4 4 4 W S(7 dC 0 9) 10 4 ...... .. (118) a a ............. 44 ft 0 146 L . j LL ..... 1! I#A ........... t. t 0 00)o _F. _S S ................. . ......... ........ ... ............... 5 X ........ • ................ ........ iiiii ** 7(14) ..X ......... .... .... ....... ........ ... ...... A ......... 7 6u) X+: ...... . .... ..... :AW ..:k:A:A):x 10. .-i X X Rf ............. x x W.6 t>a X. .......... At 4 4 OXAX-X! : ............ ............ :-X-X-X-:-X zx . ..... ... ....... ........... ........... W x .v ... ... ato X_X ..... ... ................. ....... ..... ............ ........... ..... . ........ ... x . ..... .......... (46 ....... 0 --- •----- ------------- ........... .. ................... ......... ....... ... ...... ............. :-X_:-:-X-:-X ............... jk- X x: *t X.X.:.X.X x A 9 X • ...... ..... Xb 10 ............ 8 * y4" .......... X ............ I + M ........ L 106 it ...... ...... :Sit ......... ATER PHASE'..... ............ .............. ................................ 5 T_ (I Z) : X ........ Xr . .......................... .... .. ............ X" X.: X*X ..... ...... . . ........ .... ........... • ....: # ............. ........ /i b 41j _X WWI, .......... . ................... I ....... ........... ......... X. L . ....... .............. xxx ......... ...... . ........... X ....... X.. . ........... ..... ... ......... ■ X ...... .... ............. ... ......... .. ............ ........ ....... � kk.: .. .... ... ... ..... .. .............. . ........... %%, %X:Aq. ...... ......... ... .................. ............ ................. .... ........... A: .... PLEASANTVIEW PARK ............... ........... .......... ............. ............. ........ ...... ......... ... .. ....... ....... ... ..... ...... ....... ..... Z) . .. ..... .............. %% ................ de l : :-X-X-X-X-x-x X-X -X-%%o-1_1-Y X.: x i AS . .......... ......... . .......... X. T ............ ---- 4-6 ................ .%. ............. .......... ........... ff ........... X . ... x ................. ..... ... ........... . .............. ................... ............ .... ... .... .............. 111111111 41111111 111111111 111111111 o = M 11111111 1111115 bs A a id — (tau) 0 P00dolf4do $4"AWAW ION I is) % TO z ro. Go 7 VT r. E � t Jo % 60 71 44 �2 7) 0-0 1 C2 If 3.00".F 4 20 14 SKI—JUMP 60 A 'A �vt C-0 Solt. I �tl., 00) p .17) + 4 + Q 2z -T,% T i i zoo k*k V,�� : _q I , !� ( ,z14# - . % 774LO a N S 4k - 1 .10 A 10 ql � r.; i r1f 4 F 13 rp PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP ........... SITE ........... 3 Attachment Z .1 N t N 1K 1 0 6 t ti 0 • :, �. w 1 de •• M 1 0 M N 0 0 0 Y E M Y E ..�_Aw. . •r•• .....�....... .�.. •• •a.t�.w�.� • r � �...+.. glow � 1t�...fa A •�i do effik do • i • • �. , �• 4 • f __ • • � M ♦ j � _ � Msi fuq ••�. • HIG4111111 ESTATES NO.1 ~ o . fn V. low 30 *Ab do • t�iN t • . • 1t '' • t s= sow ar /I I • t: 0 Soft oil -- I • o • ,, FINAL PLAT %.;t - � � • 'LATER b s • o •� I-�. f�— i ti = Pt��►SE • — s 411�45 I 9 O N 9-23 t C a� , • Owl 1 • • • ..t•• 1 • • + • to w 0000 y • �• • • • Il k fill" % o f •. • i • • , • 4 .a. • • . • • . • I all SARK.. .� , ;•, . �? l 1, • + • -• • .•` • SO •.. • .. , • • ! • t • • • • • I . ••• �• • 1 • • 1N�RM t•1 ft••M • • •• • • •• ♦ Y . • • . I • •• • • • 4PA am Pam "�" • 1 •! tli tM • r •A !• r • • wr A . /. _ .•' .. • � • • MORN as awr • • 1 . • • r bosom wo • t1 • w•► low • .± �! • � • •.� ,• • • • . • � • ': . •••• • : • SWAM tr(r /`f • • 0 . Wu 0, do a • . ' • ,•• • • ' w • • •• • • I • .• t•�r i • • • • • 40 46' am* mo Ow sommus • • f • •S • ' . • C • .40• • .•f - �•, • sir .,•.'i: . • �•�•• •� VP 4L 16 40 r ~� �is�••��ssss� 12 INCH WATERMAIN REQUIRED PRELIMINARY PLAT HIGHWOOD ESTATES NO. 2 4 N 4 •. Attachment 3 F AV00 7 MEMORANDUM Action by Council:. TO: City Manager Endorsed FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner o SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review Q�-l�e .. LOCATION : 2 210 White Bear Avenue Rejecte APPLICANT: General Advancement Corporation (GAC) Date DATE: June 12, 1992 INTRODUCTION The City Council should review the conditional use permit at 2210 White Bear Avenue. This CUP allows GAC to sell up to six used cars at a time. BACKGROUND August 14, 1989: The City Council granted the CUP, subject to fourteen conditions. October 22, 1990: The Council reviewed the CUP. June 10, 1991: The Council revised the CUP conditions, decided to review the CUP again in.one year and approved a variance. The CUP changes were about the requirements to curb, pave and sod the site. The variance was to drop the required curb along the south lot line. DISCUSSION GAC has finished the required site work. They can now apply for a license to sell used cars. The Council should review this CUP in one year to check the car sale operation. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for 2210 White Bear Avenue again in one year. mb\gaccup.mem go\B - 3 (11) Attachments: 1. .Location Map 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 3s, Site Plan 4. Conditions of approval dated June 10, 1991 LOCATION MAP Q N 2 Attachment 1 co TMKM , 1 A o Cr W "LL no AV AV } t �/ c� ViK1M• OR � LE 36 ooPE CT COPE AV �� � Lam •�� �:::•: . LARK AV CO Rtt 110 r LELAND. RR }' — AW J� AT Co 110 �► umwn n o ' ' t► Z goo �„ ' • ��, ; LWU N A0WNO00 • r4. N NOS. •� '. - -- • 28 = 29 T N AV •y. • ' ` g FR1891E AV - RIPLEI► W AV �c s — �; ` V i LOCATION MAP Q N 2 Attachment 1 0 v A (G7 } Z A s' Q i A — J 14= - • 1 r• 3 • . , 190. •. o f to 2229 Q � '443 T S M W 37 dl Lu oso 3 _ _", - 5 w Z t-0 & # E3 AL • BC =BUS I NESS COMMERC • � ' LBC =LIMITED BUSINESS CONHERC IAL - Ri =RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DWELLING .r R3=RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DWELLING ' - ... - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N z � f t T WI L-9 +3'7l7S0 ■� :; Go 1 1 2 CONOOMINIVMV 10O - ' , �•• OWN id As 0 N.S 45 Il a W o � ' ., A y 1. rp7R b .1' r n!. \ . (n I M j • A N �1. �` + 1 2� _1 C�� (a� �� a • �11> C1z� C�, (14),L 1 , , , or 'o oz1 0 w. 04 J r -W 1 • O A. Wr �; - .'. •, a' 3s• e4' •L• 04 eb goo • v 4 Clb 1 ;' • rol Is b Cj fit 15 — — — — — �- �. ''� ( 2-Q (25� tS�'i , � r • ( 2�.1.Z� : Z 7 13 •' �� a ' � �s' �s' �3• �s' mss• +s t � � � "t. •4• c +'sO) t9} ,� 0 v A (G7 } Z A s' Q i A — J 14= - • 1 r• 3 • . , 190. •. o f to 2229 Q � '443 T S M W 37 dl Lu oso 3 _ _", - 5 w Z t-0 & # E3 AL • BC =BUS I NESS COMMERC • � ' LBC =LIMITED BUSINESS CONHERC IAL - Ri =RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DWELLING .r R3=RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE DWELLING ' - ... - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 4 N FENCE P�.we. � I u , 1 w° > cc Q Q W GJLC. . C13 ' W FF BUILDING 3 j �-- FENCE ,......� _� ._......... ._. ._ UM MOM LOT LINE ' GRAVEL PARKING __`-. I 4 N Approval is subject to the following conditions: I. A license for the sale of used cars shall be obtained. 2. Exterior security lighting shall be provided around the car sales areas. All security lighting shall be directed or shielded so as not to cause any undue glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. 3. State approved refl ectori zed stop s igns shall be provided at all exits. 4. There shall be no more than six (6) used vehicles for sale on the site at one time. This condition shall be subject to change when the Conditional Use Permit is reviewed at the time of renewal. 5. External noises shall be unobtrusive on adjacent properties. Noises shall not exceed 50 decibels (normal conversation level) on adjacent properties. 6. The drive and parking area on the South side of the building shall be surfaced with bituminous. 7. Parking shall be allowed on bituminous areas only. All arkin s ed • � p 9 aces shall be stri p p to meet City standards (9- foot -wide stalls s for employee parking only and 9.5- foot -wide stalls for public and sales stalls). The total number of off - street parking stalls shall be subject to the approval of parking reduction authorization. The number of required parking stalls s are i n add q P 9 addition to those stalls designated for sales. The perimeter of the West and North sides of the park* n 9 areas shall have a continuous six - inch -high concrete curb which shall be subj to City taff approval. The � y pp a storage area behind the buildings shall be excluded from the requirements contained in this condition. 8. All drive aisles shall be maintained to City standards for width and design. No parking shall be permitted in the drive aisles. 9. All wood, snowmobiles, portable signs and miscellaneous Junk shall be removed from the site prior to the sale of vehicles. 10. There shall be no exterior storage of inoperable vehicles or P arts of vehicles anywhere on the property in questions, except in approved storage areas . 11. As shown on the attached site plan, one- hundred percent (100X opaque screening shall be provided across the fronts of the storage areas as viewed from White Bear Avenue. The screening shall be subject to City staff review and approval. Screening around the remainder of the storage area shall be required within sixty (60) days of the issuance of a building permit for the property immediately to the East of the site and shall be subject to the City staff review and approval. 12. If any building remodeli is to occur, satisfaction of all requirements of the Building Official and Fire Marshal, 13. No use of streamers, pennants, flags, flashing signs, or other obnoxious sale devices unless approved by the Community Design Review Board, 14. Verify property lines. 15. Sod the strip of property North of the parking lot. 16. Pave the area north of the building with continuous curbing along the � /a � North side. 5 Attachment 4 FUM0 8 AGENDA REPORT To City Manager Michael McGuire From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. ns "' . *�/�, Subject: 1992 Dispatching Contracts Date: June 11 1992 Introduction kctit by Council: Endorsed. Modified ... R e j e c t e A ._.,.�.�:..._.�,_... Date I have just received the last of the three dispatching agreements between the City of Maplewood and the Woodbury Fire Department, Oakdale Fire Department and East County Line Fire Department /Oakdale Ambulance. All of the contracts have been signed by representatives of their respective departments. Recommendation It is recommended that the two sets of each contract be approved and signed by the appropriate City of Maplewood representatives and returned to me for distribution. Action Required Review, approval and signature. KVC :js Attachments AGENDA NO. F- q AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager Qrqalvh U RE: BUDGET TRANSFER REQUEST REPAIR OF ROOF DATE: June 16, 1992 INTRODUCTION Action by Council Endorse. Modified, Rejecte Date Last winter, we experienced heavy snows followed by warming and cooling trends. This combination caused damage to our metal roof. This report is to request a budget transfer of $3,770 from the Contingency Account to the City Hall Maintenance - Repair . p & Maintenance /Building & Grounds account to cover the costs of the roof repair contractor. BACKGROUND The roof damage from the winter storms included repair of a broken roof vent, repair of ceiling tiles and walls from water damage, repair and replacement of new gutters, repair and replacement of battens which cover the seams in the roof, and fastening down all of the battens on the older side of City Hall. The contractor has performed the outside work for $3,770. Most of the contractor's expenses are associated with riveting the battens down to the roof. The heavy snow dragged the battens off of their seams. Some were saved and reused, and others needed replacing. The original installation instructions for the older side of City Hall did not require that the battens be fastened down. The battens on the newer side of the roof were installed according to the manufacturer's instructions which now recommend that they be riveted down. The insurance company was notified of the damage, and a claim has been filed for $3,822. The City has a $50,000 deductible. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the budget transfer of $3,770 from the Contingency account (101 - 119 - 000 -4910) to the City Hall Maintenance - Repair & Maintenance /Buildings &Grounds account (101 - 110 - 000 -4410) for the repair of the roof damage. tmc MEMORANDUM Endorsed TO: City Manager Mod�.fie y g Rejected-- ecte FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner d— . SUBJECT : Al vacation te .--- �._.� LOCATION: West of Birmingham Street, between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road DATE: June 15, 1992 INTRODUCTION Ms. Julie Grape is requesting the vacation of an undeveloped alley. This alley is west of Birmingham Street, between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road. (See the maps on pages 2 and 3.) She owns the house that is south of the alley. She is requesting this vacation so that the City will not build an alley on the north side of her house. This vacation would preserve the privacy of the adjacent homes. (See Ms. Grape's letter on page 4.) DISCUSSION The City does not plan to build this alley. In 1990, the City built a storm sewer pipe along the east side of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way. The City should keep a drainage easement over the west 40 feet of this alley. This easement is for an existing storm water pipe and would connect the drainage easements to the north and south of the alley. After the vacation each of the adjacent property owners will acquire one -half of the alley right -of -way. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 5. It vacates the alley west of Birmingham Street between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road, subject to retaining a drainage easement over the west 40 feet. The City should vacate this alley because: 110 It is in the public interest. 2. The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. 39 The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 49 The City has a policy of vacating unused alleys. mb /memo94.mem (10 - 29) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Letter from Julie Grape 49 Resolution 2 MARK M 3 Kohlman Lake � ,� POND sr c J Cn a 4 KOHLMANU AV Z North Y KOHLMAN AV d 0 Haze /wood cWO o Z ---- � Pk W -� CO RD �� N W ._� o > 2 CO RD Z H C TOF� �� y Z T29N, R22W 23 F- c KohJmon ° W 3 3 2 �tiLM C U) W Pk (1) � FAG ? � � J __ . ..� CR 2 0 \�� CTF��� W W �: �- Q EDG EHILL RD 10111 _ O V1 Q W Cr CON NOR pN •R j 3 ,� �z Harvest -%T G I AV �-- --'- o (1) CONNOR AV °C Pk DEMO AV m N DE- MON o g 8ROOKS AV OK C'� 22 W 6R0. o c3 z ELE v f Q SEXTANT to Four Qi XTAN T AV Seosons Pk < <E` ,12 GERVAIS AV } a GERVAIS GERVAIS E AI •p , G RV S AV \� GRANDVIEW AV Z CT PKWY ( N o . L m VIKING DR x g A; �i _ HERREN Al COPE CT C E AV Knuck Head Lake ooPE � AV Keller Lake • LARK AV W F- q �� F - A 64 a cn U. ~ o ff CO o RD � B' a LA RIE 2 ° a cn O a x Sher- Q R W U W La 25 LELAND RD a = SAND HURST "`o ff Z AV Z ° a BURKE CT a JUNCTION ST o — o Y CO > RD "B" c - -- O W Pk O P�� BURS o BU RKE o Robinhood AV �v (1) CHAMBERS ST (I) E AV ao ELDRIDG E AV Pk 'LP \G Q B � � 1 a ` 0� = M A AV C0 BE L MoNT AV W �-�. f cn y Ho // F SKI W Q I4 $ ° RECREAT /pN R A R� AV SK ICEMAN AV Q w T )o R PP��Ry o �E u o� ARRIS A LE C AV Q Q• N ROSEW00 D / Cn R� AN 0 0000p RY- AN pd S AV S 26 TRA ��.... ° QJ o QQJ 28 � FI/cek y N N zz cn m 1 5 FROST a PAr A 28 00 0 co o R / V G F o N Cr co G Cl C� �G 6Q / 27 Cr F Z EN TON AV N Cn U) °D W IQ5 Q Q J Cbster S ME R. AV W SUM I�ER N pJv W Q O tpir O W Q W = FRISBIE AV O QK >_ O Q 62 J 3 a a W= �-- �e o O a 121 O Pi W a RfPLEY AV z 4 a e } a Cr °° RIPLEY 5P`a AV F ��\ \� fr Z ° W N c WAKEFIELD W a can Round A AV �- 3x: W m S� °� % V y. V -i W .��?` KINGSTON AN � ke s Y x a N W HIA AV ti���. / /�/ � - ao� N ,� Z J J � x b o LAKE = Z = PRICE AV F a P a- �- z RICE } GV �� Cr � � 3 Q W - v C� — O � O LA R 'f h}R >:::: �V � � :. ,: .:.:�m :.:.:�.. ..: . ;... � .�:.: ;;.....: . o 30 �\ 1 PA UL 62 64 65 LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 Attachment 1 OF ♦ C ,, ( d ��i 11 to 9 a b 2 241 ` t 1 i 0 �n T Ir 20 -J �• r Z n � 013 14 1 1 1S 19 t it at t'!F l C PROPOSED ALLEY TO BE VACATED Nnof —5 , p I AO " �' •• 'W M on I n I /i 1 222T • E, ►M /' M .• /�. .. �? •� ,, 7s• �S ♦fi r ` � ► . .,se ac. M ( 11) (? 2) O 12 (7- i0 �f 14 I 12 Q1 L , N h rj (5a) O 0 40 Q N ►2 I1 ld 240' -' 8 '1 233.E Kk� t37' 6D' eo '/ • . -MIN IWO ■ 4351 0 a -• - .. to /f+ ial•1 42 S' .. - -. — — _ — — j •� 4 to 4 D' 4 4'.6 X44} � y • 'i' - s � �s ► t fg , , (ge) �2Z t83� A" 15 16 3 7 (85) 190 tgG) 27 19 ► 4 ►3 12 11 ►o 9 8� 7 16,0 S 4 .M of � _! !O �` 9 8 I. � 6 4. 3 2 I. u /. 4C ! (G�) 9 A 75 7 04 s ^� 59.2 . z 12 13 14 15 ` 0 t2l T 'tot 1l� i , 2p A l 22 19 01 21 22 23 ( 4 1 L424 i s 6 6 `, rl t s 1 240 4O /♦ ♦• • N 2251 F /• �D 1419 O O2 O2 c so N� lion -7 7 AV E. , LARK AVE, col � N �-- 124.• OF ♦ C ,, ( d ��i 11 to 9 a b 2 241 ` t 1 i 0 �n T Ir 20 -J �• r Z n � 013 14 1 1 1S 19 t it at t'!F l C PROPOSED ALLEY TO BE VACATED Nnof —5 , p I AO " �' •• 'W M on I n I /i 1 222T n 3 � ,57j ,, , � 0�.1 ROA D _ � `; LAURIE RD. • •7 /' M .• /�. .. �? •� ,, 7s• �S ♦fi O .f 13 12 1 1 1,j, `t' 1 12 01 �► i0 �f 14 Z �0 K 13 12 if 10 14 13 ►2 I1 10 9 8 '1 6 �i 4 '420 zs I oS l 79) — S — — — _ — — j •� 3d I ts r t 20210 N) 4 fg , , (ge) �2Z t83� A" 15 16 3 7 (85) 190 tgG) 27 19 to 24 22 23 2 4 2C 26 1 7 2 0 2� 2� .• •• .M of M • of I. •. to .. n 3 � ,57j ,, , � 0�.1 ROA D _ � `; LAURIE RD. 4�. 4 O .. C 1 .1 11 r2 .. rr- 7 �) � 9 .. �? •� ,, 7s• �S 1\ . 1 1a 13 12 1 1 1,j, `t' 1 12 01 �► i0 �f 14 Z �0 K 13 12 if 10 9 8 7 >� S 2211 . N - 3 I� in 1 21 �i 6 zs I oS l ►• — S — — — _ — — j •� 3d I ts r t 20210 N) zs P & ►1c ( 25 15 �2Z I t hy A" 15 16 3 7 18 190 90 27 21 23 24 2 2,6 $ �y �' •, o o �1Q11 (li; ( Of ! �.�. M ., ,/ .. Ir // u /. 4C 4�. 4 O .. C 1 .1 11 r2 .. rr- 7 �) � 9 .. �? •� ,, 7s• �S 1\ . 1 1a 13 12 1 1 1,j, `t' 1 12 01 �► i0 �f 14 a 22121 6 T0 4 / 1 >� � 1 ps . N - K 'sa l 1 21 �i 6 zs I oS l ►• — S — — — — — j •� 3d I ts r t 20210 N) zs P & ►1c ( 25 15 �2Z i A" I 1 0 1 8 19 30 ,21 22 23 2A 25, 26 21 213 89 AW ► Of ! I r 174, it it It 7' r -Vi: - -8D (2+ o ti SANDHURST AVE. poc. Z17- 4J2s_ it to /• Ii (o C 1*0 400 �1 0 h 15 14 ► 9 7 b s' 4 L 1 0 it 0 _ S / � 1 i V PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 I ? 8 7 S. 110) r2 9S• 1 .t2 98' 1 14 1 12 01 �► i0 �f 14 of a , t 6 ( 4 / 1 � ` ��! . N - �03� .! o 1l1 �i 6 34 I oS l ►• — �- S — — — — — j •� 3d I ts r t 20210 X 23 zs P & ►1c ( 25 15 �2Z 25 is A" ±1? 1 19 210 21 2 4 26 2 9 ! r 174, 7S 76' 9 A 75 4 N Maach !0, 1992 CL*iY CouncLl lrlemben.A CLty o� Maplewood 1830 6. County Road B Maplewood, M LnneAnta 55 ?6 : PublLc vacat i.vn o� alley - zn b.Coch. 6 SabLn 4dd. i,f i.on to qladAtone TALA .Letter, « a aegue4t to vacate fhe alley (legal deacai.pf i.vn above) between PnoPenti.eA owned by BonnLe ZeLmei and gulLe qAape abutting that owned by Eugene Game. We nequeat th.i.a vacat i.vn �O/t the �011owLng- aeaavna: - fhene ane no othea a.L.Ceya i.n thi.A anea. - all the vthea a.C.Leya but one ane a.Laeady vacated, - the alley n.una though undeveloped .Land fhat we own. - the alley wv.Ld have no ruheae to go except Q.N. n ito n e,tt y . - a.L.Ceya cneate OvoAable cvndLti.oni 0a 6ung.CanA - a.L.LeyA aae un4a�e anew fhat may attnacf chi,Ldnen. - theae LA no need �o pub.Li.c acceAa to the paopenty the alley would go fhnvugh - pai.vacy - we don't want an alley between nua two hvuAeA. PleaAe give thi.a vacat i.vn yvun cvnAi.denaf i.on and L� you have any pnvb.CemA 02 queAti,onA concenni.ng i.t p.Leaae .Let u.& know, sLnCe/Lely gulLe Grape .Card orvneA gqlb MAR 131992 4 Attachment 3 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Ms. Julie Grape applied for the vacation of the following- described alley: That alley west of Birmingham Street between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road in Block 6, Sabin Addition to Gladstone, in Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this alley signed a petition for this vacation; 2. The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 1 -3, Block 6,* Sabin Addition to Gladstone; Lots 23 -25, Block 6, Sabin Addition to Gladstone; and Lots 4 -22, Block 6, Sabin Addition to Gladstone; all in Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, Ramsey County, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. 30 The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 4. The City has a policy to vacate unused alleys whenever possible. This vacation is subject to the retention of a public drainage easement over the west 40 feet. Adopted on , 19929 mb /res /grape. vac 5 Attachment 4 Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 5 -18 -92 c. 7:30 p.m. - Alley Vacation: west of Birmingham Street, between Lark Avenue & Laurie Road Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report for this requested vacation of an undeveloped alley. Julie Grape, the applicant, was present. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which vacates the alley west of Birmingham Street between Lark Avenue and Laurie Road, subject to retaining a drainage easement over the west 40 feet. The City should vacate this alley because: (1) It is in the public interest. (2) The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. (3) The adjoining properties have adequate street access. (4) The City has a policy of vacating unused alleys. Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach The motion passed. Sind 't was not yet 7:45 p.m. and item d under New Busine was schedule at that time, the Planning Commission moved to tem f. f. Playing Commission Resignation Commissio r Axdahl moved the Plan g Commission accept the resignation Brian Sinn with r ret. Commissioner Marti econde Ayes -- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach The motion passe . Commissioner ischer moved the Planning mmission recommend approval o the resolution of appreciation or Brian Sinn. Commispioner Martin seconded Ayes -- Allens ch, Anitzberger, Ax 1, Fischer, Frost, Ge , Martin, Pearson, Ross b ch The motion passed. C .-7 - 42.000-0 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Lot Division and Lot Frontage Variation LOCATION: 1847 Kohlman Avenue APPLICANT /OWNER: Ray Mosio DATE: June 15 1992 Action by Council: SUMMARY Endorse Modified INTRODUCTION Rejecte Date Ray Mosio is asking that the City Council approve a division of his lot for a second home site. This division would require a variation from Code. The new lot would have Only 33 feet of street frontage. Code requires at least 60 feet. Therefore, Mr. Mosio needs a variation of 27 feet. Refer to the site plan on,page 8. Mr. Mosio plans to build and move into a house on the new lot. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Section 30 -11 states that the Council may approve variations in cases that do not adversely affect the plan and spirit of the subdivision regulations. DISCUSSION This variation meets the finding required by Code. Mr. Mosio plans to install a paved driveway. He would also post an address at the street for Parcel One. There would, therefore, be safe and easy access to the future house. The new lot would not affect the surrounding land since it is owned by the City and County. Public utilities are available. Other than the variation, Parcel One would meet Maplewood's development requirements. RECOMMENDATION 1. Approve the lot division, as Mr. Mosio shows on his April 2, 1992 site plan. (See page 8.) Before the City signs the deeds, Mr. Mosio shall pay a cash connection charge of $5,250 for water and sanitary sewer and remove the existing greenhouse. 2. Adopt the resolution on page 12. This resolution approves the 27 -foot lot- frontage variation. This variation would not affect the plan and spirit of the subdivision regulations since: a. The frontage is wide enough for a driveway. 1 b. Parcel one would not adversely affect adjacent properties. c. Public utilities are available. d. Parcel One would meet all other code requirements. Mr. Mosio shall do the following: a. Install an all- weather - surface driveway that complies with the Uniform Fire Code. The Fire Marshal shall approve the design and specifications. b. Install an address and a dead -end sign at the driveway entrance to Parcel one. c. Place the new house on Parcel one so the lowest floor elevation is at or above the 898 -foot contour. d. Excavate enough pondinq area on Parcel One to compensate for the low ground filled in for the proposed driveway. The Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District must approve this plan. e. Submit grading, drainage and utility plans to the City Engineer for his approval . 2 CITIZENSI COMMENTS City staff surveyed the owners of the eight properties within 350 feet of the site. The owners of four properties replied. Two were in favor, one had no comment and one neighbor gave a miscellaneous comment. In Favor 1. I support this Ray Mosio proposal. (Mikkelsen,, 1862 Kohlman Avenue) 2. He's been a good neighbor over 25 years. I see no problem with his project. (Stark, 2 67 6 Van Dyke Street) Miscellaneous Comment I have no objection if it can be determined that the site is suitable for a home. The land is low and peat -like in the vicinity and, I understand, when he drilled a well, after goin g 8 feet down he had a geyser of water that went higher then his house. If it is found to not be suitable for a home perhaps it should be made part of Ramsey County open space. (Carlson, 1874 Kohlman Avenue) REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 2.71 acres Existing land use: a greenhouse on proposed Parcel One and.a single dwelling and accessory buildings on proposed Parcel Two. Existing easements: There is a sanitary sewer easement along the south ten feet of proposed Parcel One. SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Undeveloped Ramsey County land and marsh land on the south part of the Maple Knolls apartments property. The City is showing both lots as OS (open space) on the land use plan. South: West: East: Undeveloped land owned by the City which the City is showing as OS on the land use plan. Undeveloped land owned by Ramsey County which the City is showing as OS on the land use plan. Single dwellings. 3 PAST ACTION Similar Approvals The City approved the following lots that do not have the required street frontage: (Refer to the maps on pages 10 and 11.) April 20,.1978: Council granted a variance for Larrie Heinzen to build on a lot along Idaho Street that did not front on the p aved roadway. May 1, 1980: Council granted a variance for Keith Libby on South Century Avenue to create three lots accessed by a 33 -foot -wide, 750 -foot -long common driveway easement. July 2, 1982: Council granted a variance for Richard DuFresne at 1721 Desoto Avenue to create three lots. Council gave his proposed Lot Three a 25 -foot variance which had 35 feet of frontage. October.10, 1988: Council granted a lot frontage variance to Lance Bierschenk at 1420 South Sterling Street to create three lots. Access to each lot is by a 30 -foot -wide, common driveway on the middle lot. There are several lots along Arcade Street that do not have 60 feet of frontage. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: RL (low- density residential) Zoning: R -1 (single- dwelling residential) Ordinance requirements: Section 3 0 -8 (f) (1) (a) (2 ) requires that lots in a R -1 zone not have less than 60 feet at the front line. PUBLIC WORKS 10 Water and sanitary sewer are available. 29 There is a sanitary sewer easement following the center line of Kohlman Avenue that runs through this lot. This would not interfere with the proposed driveway. The applicant should submit a certificate of survey showing the exact width and location of this easement. 4 ELA mb\moso.mem (Section 2, South 1/2.) Attachments: 10 Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3 Site Plan 49 Applicant's letter dated April 5. Location Map showing lots with 6. Property Line Map showing lots 7. Resolution 2, 1992 narrow frontages with narrow frontages 5 SITE LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 4 o r- ��+�..� -. ( -� 54. Lo) la MAPLEKNOLL TOWNHOMES (.4 Z) o5o 2 0 � 1 3-0 53 �� 4., P i tB c1(a3c V • ` 1 1 1 3 9 6 .7' 180.5' ioo' i00' t2a 5� 1 . 1 6 ar RAM S�y 170 o GOV NT 57 1 I 010 t.94ac. 3.o3at. C ff 5630 , 1401 2.44 ac• y ,� / 54 4� _ , s? 0 •4G o.rc . o 64 co — 9 - 0 - 2 38.7' % 2.Z -Zoo 1 arc, �.{ G - Za a 1.0 6 ac. �y PI .°�0ac. 5 o gob wl I. 01 &C. PROPOSED LOT t ��� + } 0 040 SPLIT LINE '' ,(3) - (4 s7 • i30 ( -400 ) 3 : PARCEL 2 C 10 ) (2.) 3 a o . C� 1 30 oza N — � � 7 4 a PARCEL 1 !' _ _ - ,to s° N 20 a 0 c o ` tG s� ! M o , 1847 ; 1861 1873 1885 I t -w V C jj I i A j now A I I f f wvw 4-3 austwfu-s Ilk v bo* 0 O IZ poc. fiti41G f!!!!!!! 11 � 111 i 2.6T ac. 60 L ISO' 1874 1884 j ►oo' too' -- loo -- „— 2 ►2.25' 49.s f Q% tv o [ 1862 f 0 CD 1 7 io VILLAGE 0 F (2G) ` 97 � • MAPLEWOOD r " cc 2684 ;`. 8 z 6 n s ► 3. c 3 r Z.S(pIRG 040. • 55 l.i.: '� +� �48oc - Q 267E .78 art. . o ( 0 0 ��g1 h 24 - a so W 1 3 ° ('� 5 5 .• 4 0 . ?I . , ►C +Z33 08 (1�0} O �O �" •� o •� h 2$ 23 1 CIO 50 0�o a , �5 .3c•r<. a C�-� ss p 0 * "c z Z 6 �4 %j 0P9N SM .4t a . . 14 ��) 0 1't 18 19 . 47,.G (� 135 `- �p _ -- _ 16 . o _ • Y q. v�.7 70' 22. 3 5) - ti ' (115) ;r /oo Q L0 - .a1 164c M 0 > - IS r ioo' , 03.o'JS' - • 181 3 3 e. : 6a' 18 ( I 100* 100' Ioo' 100' 1 100' 1 100' COUNTY ROAD C Lu n~ r � v 3 r r o � a PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 -J j LLJ N (+ 335)• � �G�7 ( (25) ( (24) ( (� , , Lu n~ r � v 3 r r o � a PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 7 Attachment 2 -J j LLJ N 1 601 i I I ' ' I Q Qw PARCEL 2 o j i , I of j v : I 118.89 I Lf) El 1 .. �i 0 = _j j GREENHOUSE Z 1847 N ' Ly N ' PARCEL 1 �■ O to ' c� a N ' .0� 1 � ' � I CL 60 • I � k ) own Rum ._�_ww�N_w_w_ _w��N -•_ j 218.59' PROPOSED BLACK TOP DRIVEWAY VILLAGE OF MAPLEWOOD ob 00 In w v z Q SITE PLAN W2.* 1W2 4 N Attachment 3 April 2, 1992 Dear City Council Members: At th is time .I would 1 ike to ask the C1 ty of Maplewood for a variation from the Sub division code. M proposed new lot division has no direct street access. However, it is my intent to keep in the spirit of the existing roadways which are Kohlman and Vandyke. Both of these streets are asphalt. I am planning on furnishing and installing at my expQnse a service road that will be asphalt and will provide proper access to my proposed new 1 o t . The future driveway w i l l a l s o be asphalt, In appearance Kohlman will go West and will blend in well with the existing condition spanning approximately thirty three (33) feet in width. The adjoining lot being a forest type area belonging to the Village of Maplewood. We will also provide a large sign that will display our new address near the beginning of the proposed new service road for safety purposes or in case of an emergency. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Sincerely, 9 Attachment 4 ri ri Oki ri Ili Ili bi Ili ri Ili Cis of M C D E F a O o H 1 J s K L S y p� L � �$ i ,..� low lmalws ,suns iltON. r ' 1 . i SItO N. 1 � 1►EiENO ; � o� r Gl �MTpt'Mn TAME IMf1!' -------------- e 1 /►���► ' v 7, two. "Dow - - - - _ - - - - - A BU V - 1 ; V-1 ,! Ran �tRC fA1Mt M�1!' _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - r i C If' a 00mn sun &aWW "- ---- -- - - - - -� 299011. ..��- -J , aaw..lw.o--------------- - - - --- O o------------ .- -•� OOURY „ ua sesoN. oartrsnnwllunrs+aa��4owrr___I :) a� //// C ~ u ” v ) % /��� _ 1 � 1 IlOfte • MIIMM OU f \ �� /� -. :i � 1 ! OO�MOIaRl11Mn .- ..- .._------ _- -��_ - � �.Mi: ', .A6 ' ■pfa~t ---------- ------- A6. 1 AbIR1N sA/Nf IAHL W / t •" 1 8 Ili ri 2i40N. � / �' 4_ *..►�,. 2s40K � 1 O J r A � • w C � K� riq. r e r a ®lo MOON. `s ` 2400N. 4 ® : r.a ..ew wrur "'"" LITTLE .fwiwal �•�• - 4 © V; i 21e0 N. 2ti0 N. goo 'W ASM S4W PAM I a/ t IMON. r / r r - '® 192011 S lair 1 OWN. 10 �« <�� \ \ \\ ItOON. MIIrT PAUL 7 ' 7 dnwu 12 A Ili 1 j .) SI X i n w C Ili D Ri E � F ri 4 w M r 1 1440K 'a"' 1440K ale �. r Jli4�rr CS ANN" J� S STREET INDEX a:ooK � a, a asst n. a lasooezcs VIW 8-1 minsa an. L-ae, as amaLS sT. l lasDO�zCS 9?. a -s aeasss ca. rs sDOL>!a0s 9T. 10-5, 6 saiman &VS. L-u a9cLaLLUM 9?. L-1a, Z7 1' ` • • . 9-4 seoN sso11 &"vs ST �� n. 0-4 fRIAI! ors. M MsAlmzw? RD. J, t -a, !, s, 7, ARCADS L: 0-a !a 4 VNONT sari. IT, 41, 9-t s, to ?0 it /eatYisi s?. J•1, !, $ Mo11sa>v1Y 9T. ", s, 6 ARIiz, ST. J -1, a m1DOWU is La. 11-2 10 10 ansman of. c-4, s, s am" ors. 8-1 MEYas CT. a. 9 -1 a:LalT:c ss. l-40 s, 6 4m ST., 5 Rasa 9s. 8-1e a■tamm aVS. L-9 MlcasL La. L-ae s, coon: sm. A TO 47 -4 doom&= C?. s -s 11ImWaLt n. L 9162 AY of. 4-3 TO s a aT, a 4 m=atsaalo► Ars. t, L 72011. 9aRTBLRY La. 2-1, 9, IS 9T. 2 -4 11II1101892 sm. 10-0 • saes Art. 2902-1 4nRrazs AR. a TO 2 -3 MOVEM art. R -7 gnomon 9i. A-6 donviis CT. 2•a MORELAW CT. 2 -18 *ME PINY. 8-1 OLEmDON 9T. L-9, 10 In. Wsaso11 &VS. a, c D-s 11 11 assss AD. 17-4 GORDON 9T. l - s a!as%s Cs. a -7 a �+•+ 8=4 2Ri ors. t -a emblem= Avs. • a -4 INTIAW 9?. a 1 9aLLw00D ors. s, C, D-e Est 9T. 9-5 - 'tT -� BaLa011? LA. O, I/, 9-5 Oman n. 9-e SERUM Ora. 2-7 ON 42011. as szRN33$N ST. 9-a, s, s 9T. s-s !t a N -: r BlrrnuwssT La. 2-3 /oils: MD. ! -i ': INIAND sTK si,-ie aaaus ors. 11-0 .►__4 aasrssm ari. t L-as ou Ruses CT. t . , -ss 7� �,- M •••, rte •� � I E sam m AWN. s -a aVS. L=s ORRasaGS aR. s -as "�;s, r - i sssNNOOD wars : -1 SUEZ, s:. 2-4, s BROOKS AVS. B t -a aassLPOOD a?. 9, a -1 410 a O'DAY Cis. L-i socon CT. a-a anea?s AVS. 2-19 O•DAY ST. 110-13, as TO as p asootrzss C?. L asmDRY n. 0-4 coheam M. 9-4 MON ,,.�,., t 240K BROOM= M. t, L -la attmi La. a -i9, 29 ambeRm Cols 2-6 Units &Va D, P, a, a-i nSKPOIM —1111 a -ie OTORLOOR cza. 2-19 am ST. C-4 s, s J am RVs. t -ae I or. 7--3 Va= en. 9 - 3 13 � � 13 naasom ors. to L-17 IS= L CT. 2-3 0 DOOM RD. 220 2 -2 8XI&VOW aft. a, lo lamawl►: DR. D, 2-4 CasEY as2oa?s DR. 7-1 sotiany ors. J, t, L-s »Yes ors. D-4, s, 6 j CARLTON ST. L-11 mmra=D CT. J -a frig" n. r-s Co - 00 CaRTIR AVt. t, L-19 sowaRD 9s. J•1, s 921"s CT. 11 -17 �• Cass ITS. 9-9 asosom PL. t, 10-32, is "MD airs. t, I.-IS r ..6. 0, CASTLE Ara. 2 - 4 01000011 RD. to L-aa l9lCt avg. s, 4, 2 -6 curmy Ara. so-3. To to aaMUP Ft= C?. R -as loo9laRin RD. 11-4, s, s 14 14 Cos1u ST. l - Cntlafa ors. 19-1 zoom Ara. L-7 aaD1Tt Ara. 2, J -! - CRI"z a cu. t -a In 9T. 0-5, 6 nes 27. A -s, 6 cu"Xim CT. a. t -1 M ors. 16-11 Rsn M sY ors. c, 1, 4, 2, a, a-s 240S. —240S. CusROLR "MY. J -a ROSS M. L - 9 CITY 1111160" an. 9-4 SON ST. A -s, 4 aONZIAWN AVs. a, a, C, 10-6 CLARSacs n. 9-8, a, s, 6 ohm an. L-la um9sROOD ors. a. 9 -5 Clan ST. 0 s Ja9s=s XT. c AO9s omo art. s. a - CONN= Ara. s. / -a alum as ors. /-4 am ST. I-s 103 r s 15 COMamR CT. a-3 R>taa art. 1, Mi • , ' 0011 Av R, 16 RsLLSa lawn. 9-8 i 4 ••�••• ° •� ""�• Cal cis. 1G• a , 2 -4 X31010= ST. 9-a, � a ea so s o JO•s BLVD. a-1 • anor000 CT. 9 NalDNaam ors. s, a - 4 4908 _490S. CRAIG PL. 2 -4 aee000 aR. s. 9-51 s aesaDT an. a - as CRS MNIF C?. 11 =WOOD DR. w. D s 9L•aaLLal DR. 2 -17 , ,a Canrmss W. t -la, lt, le, AS FOOD La. 10-f alums ST. D-4 CRurm2s FORS" M. Irai ass9 art. 3-15 99fairm ST. R, II-le K le amms CT. t -17 t2m0sTm ors. a, C, D, 2 sxx%2 T AR• 9, a - r cOa C10RRl s?. R -7 am= CIa. L - s 403mu 11 Avg. 4I, 2-4 . 4-S mm, L 7 M" eta. 1, 6, I -s MTSK art. -f CYlAati aoat4aa CT. 9-t stZLLMaa RVs. s, c, D, 1, 41-S 720S 720 a PL D Omni RD. l Tm L L0v.I1 s -a aoatataa La. s-s aLpa x S 11-s . 11-S -s ',� Cr Or am M. 2-17 Ian BLVD. L-1 SOMMOR La. t -17 � Ian CT. 19-17 Laat s?. I0-1 s0►aza art. W •-s DAY RD. l-4 Latw000 DR. s -1, s, 7, 9, art. 9- , memoi RVs. a, a -s IS, 1s, 17, z. NOVISt n M. a - Ta s Dfp12i IA. Iits #OOO C?. a -17 slRIJMXDt DR. 3-14 au yr �a a r 9nm =DGa AWE. 19. t -1 DGOOTO s?. C-4, t, s taalil?a a AVt. A SO D, P TO L - 4 92SUDR2DGS n. 2-1 9605 960 S. UNTRR ST. 0-68 6 LAMB CT. 10-4 91131212CE CT. 2 -5 Does um RD. t -a, IS, li, 19 U0111a Rp. C, S, a, 2-4 41MQ PL. 2-4 Down art. 9-f DOLV?t ST. l- TO 'RD. Fy 9raLZZM at. i• 7, 9, 1e, 12, Is . le 9aoas an. a l Isaasa La. 9 u 17 - t , 20 Be an ••• 4 I aD Sa CT. at LswooD AVa. t, L- NTIZJMTU ors. t -10 ssmeom CT. N -17 9TZLLIa?st 2D. t, L-9, is ODBUIL ' ND. 2 L AM = LA. t, I. 9eM11a aVt. s, 6, 2 EDB=OM a0os r � » It00 si LOasa APTOW M. t, L-is Samo CT. O-s lossam of. 0-4, s, 6 smza ors. z, J, t, L-1 Samoa a . C ST. L-1e n tLaR :aoi sri. ? � aD, sMS Ia�WS. = -0 19 19 L-1s lsowomo cT. : -as R avio1Ta art. 2 -3 saws art. R -le laanacc an. L-14 i , am ST. 4-2 . !lNIQ !a. t -17 1 I m16== K. M3 TO 4 MA?Lt La o i [ 1 fi r •.. , 1 sm NT. L-0, 10 MaTLN"= art. 9 -2 arm a1T011 RD. t, lo-13 a4 MSS. 1 � i440 S. VT. 111 W. a, 1, M1 go 4 1 FARRELL 1 L-i, 11, la Maaa&M Ara. 11-11 WALLET Vxn art. a, 3e-17 1 lsr?m11 ST. a, l -s somms CT. R -u VALUM ni• CT. 2 -17 1 1 »aDaLs ST. L 11111011121: -G TO ai, 33, 11111011121: a -ls, is, S vwmnn ST. 2 -2, 4, s, e 1 17, as MARY CT. a. R•1 Ra2S DR. D, s, e - 4 t lI!!E Art. L-11 MARY n. t -ae 1 ap L 1 vales S ' 6-2 MARY ST. 1-1. 7, 9, as, 1s aullis 9 ?. l -i 11 j s ILABDt7►0 ST. ■ -a !O 4 M UTIAMD art. t, L-i Cuss saga Art. 2.1 To 4 1690& — -`- !0ltsT K. E -a MaRTR110LL art. a-$, 4 wZl?aROI DR. J•1 WASNAVWW CO FAA= CS. l-a aRT R LA. L-12 Nom Lym Avs. 2 a, t, 10-1 !Rams Be. •osMta sEmlY nR. K - L Location Map showing lots with narrow frontages 10 Attachment 5 �•- h1�1RPM1TRtJR ASNUE n X1 6 �9 8 7 6 5 n 3 2 1 1 • iso� ne I in." :w ., •� 11�' �4} •y/ 10 11 12 PAV Emil E. IDAHO i o AVE. g C >•; Rol -6 Ibc « roc o 00 "41 N,a`ll tts • 1 • w l ap . (psi '• TLL7 12 l3 14 IE IS IB (,. fit) •O. L.► y 6: 6•• set MQYZ. • _ —�— t BLINSEN PROPERTY NO 2 0 dt' 1 � 1 � ��i•a h �N � r .I • ,•� � � • ►.n. • Vii: , � :, ' CO M I >.Mti • K• l�. I LIBBY PROPERTY s SIV ,c 1(ti: 1 I KIN STON --- > s w it O AVE. 3 O� • � a � 1 r at` � _ �` — - Vol e 1� y� -P7 •r- V •- -.-} — � �S1L ar � t 1 " r � t-- K . �► i ter) G., 's .9r; 1 ds 1 G•) t!' ' � � 1 • r ..�L:sCfhttS�~ • • DMFRBSNZ PROPERTY O JEMOW t \ . • f*J7o j Aj 1 , i� 1 ~ Cv1•nsT.t Os Rn1�ISSr a) I Avnmzi _.Z L. ov Ki>l &4. • _ 7c s , t . �` sscao. 8I ERSCBEIiTR PROPERTY RELLER LAKE AREA IMM ;'� , I t BY DRIVEWAY BAS HT 14 , ..�.. • MWT ` .L L•MT _ N _ �� �� �� two W r"av �� + • OD RELLER LAKE AREA IMM ;'� , I t SUBDIVISION CODE VARIATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Raymond M. Mosio applied for a variation from the subdivision code. WHEREAS, the legal description of the property is: A11 that part of the following as outline in red on the attached map: EX W 120 FT OF S 222.25 FT & EX W 238.7 FT OF N 400 FT & EX N 50 FT OF E 160 FT; THE FOL; THE E 398.7 FT OF W 804985 FT OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 N OF EXT CL OF KOHLMAN AVE (SUBJ TO RDS & ESMTS) IN SECTION 2 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 WHEREAS, Section 30 -11 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires at least 60 feet of street frontage. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a lot with 33 feet of street frontage. WHEREAS, this requires a variation of 27 feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variation is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this variation on May 18, 1992. They recommended that the City Council the variation. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on 19929 City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described variation for the following reasons: 141 The frontage is wide enough for a driveway. 2. Parcel One would not adversely affect adjacent properties. 3. Public utilities are available. 4. Parcel One would meet all other code requirements. Attachment 7 12 Mr. Mosio shall do the following: 10 Install an all- weather- surface driveway that complies with the Uniform Fire Code. The Fire Marshal shall approve the design and specifications. 2. Install an address and a dead -end sign at the driveway entrance to Parcel One. 3. Place the new house on Parcel One so the lowest floor elevation is at or above the 898 -foot contour. 4. Excavate enough ponding area.on- Parcel One to compensate for the low ground filled in , for the proposed driveway. The Ramsey /Washington Metro Watershed District must approve this plan. 5. Submit grading, drainage and utility plans to the City Engineer for his approval Adopted on , 1992. 13 ..Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 5 -18 -92 The Commission directed staff to advertise for applicants for the vacant seat from.the following areas: west of I- 3 5 E, Kohlman Lake, and. south of 1-94. 69 VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There were no visitor presentations. 80 STAFF PRESENTATIONS a. Secretary Olson notified the Commission of the Mayor's Forum scheduled at 6 p.m. on June 2, at which the Comprehensive Plan will be reviewed. 5. NEW BUSINESS d. 7:45 p.m. - Alley Vacation: Between Edward, Frank, Ripley & Sophia (Reid) Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, informed the Commissioners of revisions to the initial staff report. The applicant, Randall Reid , was present at the meeting. There were no comments from the public. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which vacates the part of the alley that abuts Mr. Reid's lots, subject to retaining a public drainage and utility easement. The City should vacate this alley because: (1) This vacation is in the public interest. (2) The City has no plans to build an alley in this location. (3) The adjoining properties have adequate street access. (4) The City has been vacating unneeded alleys whenever requested. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach The motion passed. e. 8 p.m. - 1847 Kohlman Avenue (Mosio): Variation and Lot Division Secretary Olson presented the staff report. The applicant Ray Mosio discussed his request with the Commission. Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 5 -18 -92 Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend: (1) Approval of the lot division as Mr. Mosio shows on. his April 2, 1992 site plan. Before the City signs the deeds, Mr. Mosio shall pay a cash connection charge of $5,250 for water and sanitary sewer and remove the existing greenhouse. (2) Adoption of the resolution approving the 27 -foot lot - frontage variation. This variation would not affect the plan and spirit of the subdivision regulations since: (a) The frontage is wide enough for a driveway. (b) Parcel One would not adversely affect adjacent properties. (c) Public utilities are available. (d) Parcel One would meet all other code requirements. Mr. Mosio shall do the following: (a) Install an all- weather - surface driveway that complies with the Uniform Fire Code. The Fire Marshal shall approve the design and specifications. (b) Install an address and a dead -end sign at the driveway entrance to Parcel One. . (c) Place the new house on Parcel One so the lowest floor elevation is at or above the 898 -foot contour. (d) Excavate enough ponding area on Parcel One to compensate for the low ground filled in for the proposed driveway. The Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District must approve this plan. (e) Submit grading, drainage and utility plans to the City Engineer for his approval. (f) A deed restriction shall be recorded against Parcel One which prohibits any further division of these properties as a means to control the number of houses. Plannin Minutes of 5-18-92 -7- Commissioner Pearson seconded 'A Anitzber Axdahl, Fischer,.Frost, Martin,, Pearson, Rossbach Na The motion passed, 7* COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS a,. Ma 11 Council Meetin Commissioner Rossbach reported on this meetin b. Ma 28 Council Meetin No plannin items C* PUD Ordinance Report Commissioner Rossbach reported on the*.PUD Ordinance report. 9* ADJOURNMENT Meetin adjourned at 8,.46 p.m. 11 G -3 Action by Council: Endorse _ MEMORANDUM Modif i e TO: Cit y Manager er Rejecte FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Date SUBJECT: Ordinance on Temporary Signs and Sign Enforcement DATE:. June 12 , 1992 INTRODUCTION On November 14, 1991, the City Council directed Staff to study the small sign regulations. These regulations apply to signs that are less than sixteen square feet. The Council wanted to know how we enforce these regulations and what the penalty for violating the ordinance is. The Council was especially concerned about signs placed on the right -of -way and on telephone poles. The Council requested that we advertise the sign regulations. The Council wanted articles in the newspapers and the Maplewood in Motion. The Mayor was concerned about the D.A.R.E. ribbons. The Public Safety Department put up these ribbons on car antennas, utility poles and traffic signs as part of their drug awareness program. These ribbons become an eyesore or a litter problem when the weather tatters fades them or the wind blows them on the ground. BACKGROUND The City Council last changed the temporary sign regulations on April 22, 1991. The Council exempted temporary signs that have less than 16 square feet from the sign permit requirement. The Council also reduced the time that a business may use temporary signs to 30 days a year. The previous regulation allowed temporary. signs from 40 days to indefinitely, depending on the sign type. On March 9, 1992, the Council requested a plan for enforcing City regulations. On May 4, 1992, the Council decided to educate the public about the city's sign regulations, rather than strictly enforcing the regulations. The Council directed City staff to place articles in the Maplewood Review and Maplewood in Motion about the City's sign regulations. DISCUSSION Enforcement of Temporary Si ns We enforce the sign ordinance when we receive a complaint or when our part -time intern has time to go out on inspections. If the sign violates a regulation, the inspector must give the sign owner 30 days to correct the problem. If the owner does not correct the violation by then, the City may remove the sign. Thirty days notice is too long for some temporary signs and for signs that are a safety hazard. Most of these signs have little or no monetary value. Many temporary signs are up for less than thirty days. Garage sale signs are an exam le. The proposed osed P ordinance would allow us to remove illegal temporary signs that are on a street right -of -way. We could also remove hazardous signs. The new ordinance would allow the city inspector to determine a reasonable time to remove temporary signs that are not on a street right -of -way. This would depend on the type of sign and violation. We have not done any advertising of sign regulations yet, since we are proposing changes to the small sign and real estate sign g g ordinances. Once we have our regulations in place we will advertise. Ribbons The definition of sign in the sign code includes the D.A.R.E. ribbons. The sign regulations, however, exempt signs required to g � be posted by governmental order. Since these ribbons were part of a City - sponsored program, we have not required that the Public Safety Department remove them. The Public Safety Department has removed most of these ribbons. Proposed Ordinance The proposed ordinance does the following: 10 It allows the staff to remove illegal signs on a public street right -of -way or that are a safety hazard. It also allows the inspector to give reasonable notice for other sign violations. The current regulation requires that the city give at least 30 days notice for all sign violations. 2. It omits obsolete language on permit and variances. 3. It allows off -site garage -sale signs way. The setbacks would be the same approved for real estate signs. The not allow garage sale signs on the r: RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance, to \tempsign.mem go \B -3 (5.4) Attachments: 1. Survey 2. Ordinance records, enforcement on street rights -of- as the Council just current ordinance does fight -of -way. 2 SURVEY TEMPORARY SIGN ENFORCEMENT November 22, 19 91 City staff asked 25 cities the following questions about temporary sign enforcement: A. Do you enforce the regulations? Be Does the City give a sign owner time to remove a sign? C. Can the City take down the signs? D. Does the City issue citations? Eden Prairie A. Yes. B. Yes, co Yes, if necessary. D. The city rarely issues citations. Blaine A. Yes, but only if someone complains. B0 Yes. C . Yes. D. The city rarely issues a citation. Maple Grove A. Yes. B. No. co Police may take down the sign if it is a hazard. D. No. Richfield A. Yes, but only if someone complains. B, Yes . co City has ability to take signs down, but rarely does. 3 D. No Apple Valley A. Yes. The city tries to strictly enforce the sign ordinance. B. No. C. Yes. The City would immediately take down the sign. The city would then contact the sign owner and hold the sign until the owner came to get it. When the sign owners pick up their signs, the city informs them that they have violated the city code. D. The city will issue citations for repeat offenders. Brooklyn Center A. Yes. B. Yes. The Police Department contacts the sign owners and gives them time to remove their signs. Co The Police may take the sign down. D. The Police may give a citation to repeat offenders. Fridley A. Yes, but only if someone complains. B. Yes. Co Yes, if necessary. D. The city may issue a citation, but only as a last measure. Lakeville A. Yes. B o' Yes . Co Yes. Do Yes, for repeat offenders. Crystal A. Yes. B . Yes. 4 C. The city may takedown the sign immediately if sign is a hazard or the owners do no take their signs down. D. Never has issued a citation. Inver Grove Heights A. Yes, if someone complains. Be Yes. CO The city has the authority to take down a sign, but rarely does. D. No. New Hope A. Yes. Be Yes. Co The police may take the sign down if necessary. D• No. Golden valley A. Yes, if someone complains. Be Yes. C. Yes, but only after giving the sign owners time t-o remove their signs. D. The city may issue citations, but rarely does. South St. Paul A. Yes. Be No. Co Yes. The city takes the sign down and notifies the sign owner. D. The city issues citations to repeat offenders. Eagan The city does not regulate small signs. 5 Plymouth A. Yes. B. No. C. Police would take down the signs immediately. D. No. New Brighton A. Yes, if someone complains. Bo Yes. Co Yes. D. The city issues citations to repeat offenders. Woodbury The city does not regulate small signs. Oakdale A. Yes. B. Yes., Co Yes. D. Yes, if necessary. Cottage Grove A. Yes, if someone complains. B. No. C. The city will tear down the signs immediately. D. No. North St. Paul A. Yes. B. No. Co Yes. The city will immediately take the signs down. 6 D. No Roseville The city does not enforce the sign ordinance. Minnetonka A. Yes. Be Yes Co The city may take down the signs if they become a problem or a hazard. D. The city may issue citations to stop people from putting signs in certain locations. Shoreview A. Yes. Be No. Co Yes, if the signs becomes a problem or hazard. Do No . White Bear Lake A. Yes. Be Yes. C. Yes, if the sign is a problem or the city cannot contact the sign owner. D. Yes. The city will issue citations to repeat offenders. West St. Paul A. Yes. B. Yes. C. Yes. D. The city may issue citations, but rarely does. 7 SUMMARY The following is a summary of this survey: A. 22 cities enforce their sign regulations. B. 15 of the 22 cities that enforce their ordinance give the signs owners time to remove their signs. Co All 22 cities that enforce their regulations can remove signs. Only 7 of the 22 cities that enforce their ordinance took the signs down without notice. 4 of these 7 cities only remove the sign if it is hazardous in some way. D. All the cities reported that citations are rarely or never used. If these cities use citations, they only use them as a last resort or for repeat offenders. Eleven of the cities we surveyed never issue citations. These eleven cities do not enforce the ordinance or they enforce the ordinance by taking the signs down. 8 ORDINANCE NUMBER _ AN ORDINANCE ABOUT TEMPORARY SIGNS AND SIGN ENFORCEMENT The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of ordinances: (I have underlined the additions and.crossed out the deletions.) Section 1. This section changes section 36 - 230 (Definitions - Sign Types: By Function) by adding a definition of garage -sale sign as follows: Garage- sale A sign that advertises the , sale of a person' s goods from their_ home . This def in tion includes yard- sale and estate - sale - sign= Section 2. This section changes section 36 -235 as follows: Section 36 -235. Signs on Same - on rocks, f =roes; trees %V ftVW 0 n • or utility poles --3 ��-� r -- - -- s i Ate - = There shall be no sick on rocks, trees or utility pole= Section 3. This section changes sections 36 -240 through 36 -243 as follows: Sec. 36 Permit records . •Ir-sr ee i enS The city shall maintain a record of sian oermits as reauired by the city's records retention schedule. i r 1 1 %. 4 n . a. % - S 0 " an emereF 133r e, = :k i m 3 a Seca 36-2419 Enforceme procedur 'T �� � �� remo or 'J Permanent signs. The city shall send a written notice to the owner of any illegal, permanent sign. This notice shall require that the owner correct all code violations. If the sign is not a safety hazard, the city shall allow at , least ten days :for C the owner to correct the violations._ If the sign, is, _a safety_ hazard, the city shall take immediate action to end the hazard. I f the sig_ ner does not obey the city's orders the city_.may_ remove the sign or have whatever work done that is needed to correct the code viol =ions. The city.may recover its.costs under th= procedures of section_ 19 -13. If the _city_ removes , a sign, the city may sell or dispose of it if the owner does not reclaim th_ian and Ray any removal _costs within thirty (30) _ . days of the ^ sign's removal . Temporary signs. The c, itymay remove illegal temporary s,ian, s on a street right -of -way. The City shall give the owners of any other illegal temporary signs reasonable notice to correct the violation. If the city removes a sign,, the city may _sell or dispose of it if the owner does not reclaim the sign and pay any removal costs within thirty, ( 0) days of the.sign's removal. • T. :E lqgmiz 10 Sec. 36 -242• Appeals and variance v %ft.60 ' Appeals and va, riances from , this article shall follow the procedures in State l_ • . 0-F Er fa - • _ - - _ -: _ -- - Olml iiiii I ll _- _ _ - =- v- M ETAM - v • e I v I I v -- -- -- -- -- - - _ _ _ III 44IL"WIL - -_ -- - -- __ _- _ _ _ mr �m v mr v I qP 111I • Ill IIIIIIII0 We • qP 9 - - - - M - - - - ° - - - - - - _ • qp _ - • • • - - -• - - - - m W111 EW Of � v I � I � • _ _ - - - • v • 1 U9 III UILMlll • v - - _ - I MA I I v I - • m o - - • or - Ut or - - - - On sw O& - - - • W NOW _ MOP !W I I v 1P III v • III v MW - - _ I 11111 v - v - w _ 40 -ft • Wil I Or IF Ik IF IL IW A L m ! • Ir am I imp - _ _ w mv ' a" qP IIIIIIII q q ILNP Or IF wo SI&IMWD on mv 4P 141l' 41agillowl! Or IIL-I�mrw swe ll Wil ON _ _ I I - - - - - - _ - - = - - - v I I M E - - - - - - - - I • v • - I v m - AL I I • I • - • - I - _ ML NO 9 - - _ _ A-10. K - - i��ii iz- I P - • _ - - v I • - W - - • I v v I • _ - - - _ - an e �' a e r n -E - L, � r. J r+ e f a • • • • • 11 / it f. f / 3 H % F t o E - .39 f e e e d 3&.. n f= : 1. f 4 3 3 • oW :Fer- eaela 4au �� I fto %.F % . 0 n r- %W a � Section 4. This section changes section 36 - 256 as follows: Section 36 - 256. Required; exceptions. Every person must get a sign permit before erecting, placing, reconstructing, altering or moving a sign, except the following: {1) Incidental, construction, political, garage-sale or real estate signs, (2) Maintenance, repair or the change of sign copy. (3) Temporary signs that are sixteen (16) square feet or less. (4 Flags. Section 5. This section adds changes section 36 -307 as follows: Sec. 36 -307. Schedule No. 1: All districts. The city permits, the following special purpose and temporary signs a - l— be— inernitte�d in all zoning districts * _ a ~ ' 4- tx Such signs shall be exempt from section 36-278 .(temporary signs)_ and schedules II - V (permitted sians by zonina district). Such signs shall be subject to the following limitations e eif : (No change in subsections 1 - 14.) 15 Garage - sale signs, L subject to the followina_qu_ir_ements: a, A person may place garage-saleL signs of three (3) sauare feet or less on a boulevard. No part of such signs shall be closer than ei (8) feet to a street pavement or two (2)� fee_ a sidewalk or trail. b. The City shall only allow such signs, from three days before the sale until one day after the sale. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect after its passage. Approved by the Maplewood City Counc on , 1992 12 Community Design Review Board -2- Minutes of 6 -9 -92 Boardmember T mpson moved to deny the sign plan changes that Mr. Tire i requesting for the Ma ewood Auto Center, because: (1 } If Mr. Tire wer not part f the shopping center the four additional s ns w d the the number that the code allows in a BC siness commercial} district. (2) There is no reaso to a ow Mr. Tire to deviate from the shopping ce er sign an. The City would then have to approv similar re ests from other tenants. This would eat the purpos of the sign plan. The Board als 'requests 0 proposing a ew signage Center so a Board can for the nter . Board ember Erickson sei b. Code Change - Temporary that the appl *cant consider plan for the a ire Maplewood Auto reconsider the a fire signage plan Conded Ayes- -Moe, rickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson Signs The Board discussed the proposed code changes in this ordinance. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the small signs ordinance. Boardmember Holder seconded 7. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There re no visi/esentations. tations. 8. BOARD PRESENTATION There were.no Boar 90 STAFF PRESENTATION Ayes - -Moe, Erickson, Holder, Robinson, Thompson a. Board Me4 Volunteer for the June 22 Council Meeting: Bruce Tho son b. Boardme er obinson questioned staff about whether the City Counci is 1 king for comments on the Maple leaf wall hangi g in the Council Chambers. Secretary Ekstrand said he was of aware t e Council wanted comments from Board mem ers. Discus 'on concerned the position of the Maple i Action. by C oun.c i i MEMORANDUM En.dors e ... To City Manager +. FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Districts �ej oote SUBJECT: Commercial Zoning ordinance DATE: June 12, 1992 Date INTRODUCTION On.March 9, 1992, the City Council requested that the staff prepare a report on recreation uses in the BC (business commercial) zone. Councilmember Zappa requested this report after the Council approved a conditional use permit for an indoor athletic center for children at 1900 County Road D. Councilmember Zappa thought that this type of use should not need a conditional use permit. DISCUSSION Recreation Uses This ordinance covers the BC (business commercial, BC(M) business commercial (modified), SC shopping center and the M -1 light manufacturing zoning districts. These are the districts that allow recreation uses. In regard to recreational uses, this ordinance does the following: 1. It permits indoor theaters and indoor organized athletic activities, such as dance, physical fitness or karate classes. The City would not require a conditional use permit for these types of uses. 2. It requires a conditional use permit for other types of recreational activities, not listed in number 1 above. The current code requires a conditional use permit in the BC and BC (M) zones for any indoor places of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than a theater. The SC district allows these uses without a conditional use permit. The M -1 district allows indoor and outdoor places of amusement, recreation or assembly. Requiring a conditional use - permit for indoor theaters or indoor athletic facilities is not necessary. The Director of Public Safety feels that the City should require a conditional use permit for other types of indoor recreational activities, such as pool halls or video arcades. The City should also require a conditional use permit for outdoor places of amusement, recreation or assembly. These types of uses could be a nuisance to nearby properties. Examples of such uses include go -kart tracks and outdoor theaters. A conditional use permit would allow the City to regulate hours of operation, noise, lights and other potential nuisances. 1 �; . Z/ In addition to changes in recreation uses, the ordinance updates other requirements and creates consistent wording between districts. Since the Planning Commission.saw this ordinance, I have included itinerant carnivals as a permitted use, subject to City licensing. Most carnivals do not have time to go through a conditional use permit process. The license requires Council approval. I have also deleted references in the M -1 district to the old comprehensive plan land use designations.. Motor Puel.Stations The. Planning Commission is recommending changes to pages 6 and 7 of the ordinance. These changes would prohibit minor motor .fuel stations within 350 feet of a residential lot line. Before 1989, the City allowed motor fuel stations as a permitted use. In 1989, the Council made major changes to the motor fuel station requirements. The Council made these changes after Amoco applied for changes to the City's land use plan and zoning map on 11th and White Bear Avenues. The ordinance prohibits major stations within 350 feet of a residential area, but permits minor stations. Major stations are those with more than two dispensers on one island. The Council approved the ordinance after testimony from several industry representatives. We can see no reason to change these requirements now. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance, kr /memo88.mem go /b -3 (5.1) Attachment: Ordinance F ORDINANCE No. AN ORDINANCE ABOUT LAND USES IN THE BC ( BUSINESS COMMERCIAL), BC -M (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL MODIFIED, THE SC (SHOPPING CENTER) AND THE M -1 (LIGHT MANUFACTURING) DISTRICTS THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE: (I crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions.) Section 1. This section ch anges section 36 - 6, definitions, by adding definitions for motor vehicle wash and residential lot line and revising the definition of public garage as follows: Motor vehicle wash: build ng for washing motor vehicles. This definition does not include the occasional hand washin of vehicles stored in a parking garage_ Maintenance Garage: A n building for the maintenance or repair of motor vehicles. This definition does not include a A motor vehicle accessory installation center or motor vehicle wash. �a ai' =n* I%= m-=' 134=4 . Residential lot line: The lot line of_ any _property with a residential building on it or any ,property that the City is olanning for residential use on its land use plan_ Section 2. This section changes Division 7 of Chapter 36 as follows: DIVISION 7. BC BUSINESS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT The following recruirements shall apply to all land in a BC District: Sec . 3 6 -151. Uses. �- -ran33 3 a j- � - � aw � 400 �'V w W6 %as %0. i �/ •� V • (a) Permitted uses. The City shall only permit the following uses by r Q 4 t , -f n 1 1 exa i n cs ._....;���r,� --� r e 3 : 4 - a- -=-a �� .&. 7 ~ j " -.1. % I a %w I n a 13 G (1) A dwelling unit for one family in combination with a business use. (2) Hotel, motel or tourist cabins. (3) Retail or commercial rental activities , - *: A= 0 restaurant, on -sale liquor.business (subiect to license office, clinic : ,— studio, bank, personal service, day care center, craftsmen's shop or mortuary. All business, storage or display, except signs and parking, shall be In a closed building. 3 (4) The s o f _ _ _ _ ___ _-.�- -�-�� new motor vehicles ears or new and used motor vehicles ears* (5) Publishi i = photocopying or �-eb printing establishment. ( 6) Indoor theater. z (7) US V Now al!"s - s e Laundry (8) Bakery or ca ndy , which produces moods for on= premises .seta= ale. _h� L . a- Q= a=4=4*123imc 42A (9) Parking lot as a principal use. (10) Motor vehicle accessory installation center. (11) CNG (compressed natural gas) or LPG (liquid petroleum gas) dispensing facilities,, Tanks shall not exceed a water capacity of one thousand five hundred (1,500) � gallons for e~ those dispensing facilities whose primary purpose is to produce power and light for nonvehicle uses, such as at 3M, NSP's facility on Century Avenue, or for temporary use on construction sites. ' •. • L pAs. . AL %00 _(Refer to the licensing recquirements in ,Chapter 17.3. ) ( 12 ) , Repair shop, except motor ,fuel stations or maintenance garages. All business storage or display_, except signs and parking hall be in a closed building 1 13 ) Organized athletic activities, such as dance physical fitness or _karate, that are conducted indoors. ( 14 ) Itinerant carnivals subject to the licensing reaui.rements in chapter 6, article VI . ( 15 ) Any use that would be ,similar to any _of, the above uses if it is not noxious or hazardous. as - 3. ed (b) Conditional uses. The following uses must have a conditional use e x1111t' �-� —f�1 1 ��a; nc*ia a es arm =e�� *: NUO (1) All permitted uses r _: =ttca in the R - district, (2) Processing and distributing station for ' v er .:k713a � NW beverages. (3) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than an indoor a theater, indoor athletic activity or itinerant carnival (4) The exterior storage, display, sale or distribution of goods or materials, but not including a junkyard, salvage automobile,. or other wrecking yard. The city may require screening of such uses. (5) The sale of used motor vehicles. � e*a ear 3 A (6) Metal storage buildings, if the building meets the findings for a conditional. use .permit and the f indinas below . _t �� -4=3M A 4= i n .A 4 4 i �- ; m" 4M 4=340 ,�,.�, , W M 3 • & 1 � ��..w ...�•... w i.. va %P4 %w4 ii %soi6vaa VV %►1A`+ y\.r1 a%.+i %.4.6 L... „, •+ .a �. • a. No more than twenty_(20)-percent of the build would be visible ' ^ra^ni - v va v �-� -- * d from streets or � .� - v v� V residential lot lines. ' b. The building would not be of lesser quality than surrounding development. If the screening not , replace it,_ require that the If the value of thousand dollars allow at least a (7) Heliport. is removed or dies and the owner does &-6-.i - S %W %W �ep�a�ee I the city council may owner remove y...,r„t,..3 ..f the building, the building exceeds twenty -five ($25,000), the city council shall five -year amortization period. (8) Reserved. Ca T.T•+ S!, (9) Motor fuel stations, motor vehicle wash or maintenance garages, if they meet the findings fora conditional use p�rm, it and the findings below ; fa,a ;- -z @ �► c3 —..,., ...,... i . a ; �. ; . .� a. The setback of any overhead canopy shall be at least fifteen (15) feet from the street right -of- 5 way line and five (5) feet from a nonresidential property line. b. The setbacks to a residential zene lot line in section 3 G 1- �aa -(430 -; 3 6-28 (c) (6) shall include motor vehicle ear washes, fuel dispensers or canopies.. c . Major motor fuel stations or maintenance :garages shall be at least three hundred fifty (350 feet from a residential lot line. d. No unlicensed or inoperable vehicles shall be stored on the premises for more than forty -eight (48) hours, except in storage areas that are fully screened from public view. e. All trash, waste materials and obsolete parts shall be stored within an enclosed trash container. f. All repair, assembly, disassembly and maintenance shall occur within a closed building, except minor maintenance. Minor-maintenance shall include work such as tire replacement or inflation, adding oil or wiper fluid replacement. g. The City must approve the location and type of outdoor storage ��--; � I fi =13 i=ce-; = =�AXXiQ-I in the conditional use permit. h. No parking space (s) shall be within the line of vision between self- service fuel dispensers and the attendant's window. i . Noise from operations, including external ��' speakers shall not exceed the noise standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency_ be V+1\Ai.i •AV V �rtb. VG�%.AL j. No motor fuel station or maintenance garage within ft 10-M three hundred fifty (350) feet of � - I'' "" eer - e~ i 4e= *: i =' use a residential lot line shall be operated between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. 0 k. Fuel station dispenser islands, parking areas, and drives shall be screened from residential lot lines ' in conformance with se ction 36 -27(c) and section 36-27(d). 110 Parking shall be limited to paved areas. M . All new or replacement underground fuel storage tanks shall meet the standards of Minnesota Statutes and the standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Such tanks shall also have a UL listing appropriate for their use. In addition, installation plans shall be submitted to the State Fire Marshal's office for approval. n. There shall be.leak I detection equipment on d'fer all new and existing tanks according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) schedule deadlines. Leak detection facilities shall include electronic (in tank) monitoring equipment as well as manual daily measurement and recording of tank levels., Records of daily tank levels, fuel purchases and fuel sales shall always be available on site for inspection by the Fire Marshal =' 3 6 *- ; e m 0 0 o. Vents from an underground fuel storage tank(s) . shall be two hundred (200) feet from a residential lot line=— r = op�rt.1;..�,e_ m ,��; a „�.; � , „,... The city counc may approve a lesser setback if the developer can prove that the typography or existing or proposed buildings will prevent fumes from reaching a residential lot line. p. Motor vehicle Gar washes .f :6 shall be subject to the same conditions as stated for motor fuel stations, with the following additional conditions: 1 14 a a i -- :� r,, i i ��n���C1 a A J :� 4. :C 4 jZr Water %W from a motor vehicle ear wash shall not drain onto e a public street or access. A drainage system shall be installed, subject to the approval of the city engineer. 29 There shall be -taki- stacking space for at :1= least b= �� � �� �� r ar � . � v�M rr r Va V V V iLKI. V \/. rL V V a mu ef four (4) vehicles. 7 ( 10 ) Anv use that would be sim to any of the above uses if it is not noxious. or hazardous, 1 -1 -34 = *: Lim w w� w %. � �. 4L a ..L x..16 •• ri r M V A. ALL i V V V M • 11 Anv building or outside use, except parking that within 75. feet of a residential buildina� Section 3. This section changes subsections 36 -155 (b) and ( the BC (M) Business Commercial District (Modified) as follows: (b) Permitted uses. The City shall only i t the following uses by right • � ' T -'� ,�+ �- �- :12 ----� gjLj (1) Reta or commercial rental activities,o office, c_ 1in_ ,- studio, bank, personal service, day _care center, craftsmen's shop or mortuary. All business, storage or display - , except „signs_ and parking, shall be in a closed building (2) Hotel or motel. (3) Indoor T4 •_, 1 '' - J n theater (4) Publishing, photocopying or printing establishment, (5) Bakery or candy shop producing goods for on- premises retail sales, (6) Motor vehicle accessory installation center, Repair shop, except motor fuel stations or maintenance garages. All business, storage or display, except signs and . parking_, shall be in a closed building_ (8) Organized athletic activities,, such as dance,�physical fitness or karate, that are conducted indoors. _(9) Itinerant carnivals, subject to the licensing recruirements in chapter 6, article VI. 10 -{4+ Any use that would be similar to any of the above uses, if it is not noxious or hazardous._. us JEAR.e same as an u % . 0 -- r �_ _LL... v vv ... • a (c) Conditional uses. The following uses must have a conditional use berm it : are (1) All permitted uses -- in t,. he R-3, multiple- dwel ling districts --- V %0 &MT - A J A. %.0 T-' r (2) Laundry. ' env ..- - -- — &� (3) Restaurant, where there are no drive -up order windows or serving of food to patrons in their automobiles. All cooking odors must be controlled so as not to be noticeable to adjacent residences. (4) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than an.indoor -a theater, _indoor athletic activity or itinerant carnival., L,ti,�,,,. '.ti, .. ne -e ee�� a s a- i t t .; � * ,. :s- (5) Minor motor fuel station, subject to the requirements in section 36 151(b)(9). „(6), On -sale liquor business (s bj ect to l icense) . —}Any use that would be similar to any of the above uses, if it is not noxious or hazardous Af �-'�a c a Section 4. This section changes Division 8 of Chapter 36 as follows : DIVISION 8. SC SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT The following rectuirements, shall apply to all land in a SC District: Se 36 -171, 36 -172. Reserved, See, 36 -173. Use regulations. (a) Permitted uses. The City shall only permit the following uses b..�, right' :-- „= 90 Q]Q��,�, 0 r�._r =34+-0= = =i sm 0,� a + i/iV Sri iV V iii emmum Retail or,commercial rental activities, restaurant, on- sale 1 icquor business (subject to 1 icense ) , of f_�„ clinic, studio bank, personal ls rv,ice,,day care center,_ craftsmen's shop or mortuary__ All busing storage or display,_ except signs and parking shall be in a closed building immUlaim" :610W uses w • t 32 emers e a ba / / / / • (2) Publishing i t Photocoipying or printing establishment. (3, Indoor theater. =At Ami=3334imm (4 Laundry,_ (51+6+ Bakery or candy shop / which produces goods for on- premises retail sale = in•- •- _3*aru a ���� -� m • _ • um alumh aa are 1 • 3 A42 • • L am 3 • • . 10 e OM==a=:1=WAX • • • • L'� l v. - �. ^ l v....7 •-. . � - A 1 O s i � .L� • I r m.. 1 A=Y _Mm /� • • 1 1 r A'M, 1 = A • CZ X • 9 r► A w • '•• 1 a* • I • �T. e r ■ �/� ^ d y w' v& r V i� • (6) Motor vehicle accessory_ins_lation center , (7) Repair shop ,,.except motor e 1 stations or maintenance garages . All _ bus i, ne; s , storage or display, except signs and parking, shall be in a closed building_ ,(8) Organized athletic activities, such as dance, physical fitness or karate that are conducted indoors. Itinerant carnivals, subject to the licens recquirements in chapter 6. article V= (10) Accessory use customarily incidental to any of the above uses. (11) Any use that would be similar to any of the above uses if it is not noxious or hazardous. Af th = _— 'e„eW=13 4-lan=i 004 as Ea - -- - -- 16 - • a • a � (b) Conditional uses. The following uses must have a conditional use permit: (1) Place of amusement, recreation or assembly, other than an indoor theater indoor athletic activity_or itinerant carnival. .(2) The exterior storage display_,, sale or distribution of goods or materials but not including_a junkyard, salvage automobile, or other wrecking yard. The City may require screening of such uses. 11 Section 5. This section changes Section 36 -186 and 36 -187 of the M - 1 light manufacturing district as follows: sec. 36 - 186. Permitted uses. The City shall. only _permit the following,_ uses by right: a == eerM3 (a) Any use listed as a permitted use in a BC Business and Commercial D - �A--Wr 1-V .�V OA. %.- -aa • (b) Wholesale business establishments. (c) Custom shop for making articles or products sold on the premises. (d) Plumbing, heating, air conditioning, glazing, painting, paper handling, roofing, ventilating and electrical contractors, blacksmith shop, carpentry, soldering or welding shop. s e • (ejjj-}- Bottling establishment. (f H}- Manufacturing, assembly or processing of (I) Canvas and canvas products. (II) Clothing and other textile products. (III) Electrical equipment, appliances and supplies, except heavy electrical machinery. (IV) Food products, except meat, poultry or fish. (V) Jewelry, clocks or watches. (VI) Leather products. (VII) Medical, dental or drafting equipment, optical goods. (VIII) Musical instruments. (IX) Perfumes, pharmaceutical products, rubber products and synthetic treated fabrics. (X) Small products from the following previously prepared materials: cork, feathers, felt, fur, glass, hair, horn, paper, plastics or shells. (XI) Sporting goods. (XII) Tool, dye and pattern making or similar small machine shops. (XIII) Wood products. 12 jgl, -{-�- Carpet and. rug cleaning. .. (h.1 D Y -g plant. ,( D research, experimental or testing. _. % o IF af i.P.e. . 9- S choo1. (kj+n} Warehouse. (11J.e} Accessory use on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any of the above permitted uses_ :11=3 33C]i 3QCS 'all . , a J6 , sec. 36 -187. Conditional uses. (a) The following uses must have are.. --pe J6 %0 %*%No ?4 � ef a conditional use permit: (1) Any conditional use in the BC Business Commercial district, subje to the same conditions. • . 3 . . s o ( 211 3+Any use of the same character as a permitted use in section 36 - 186. ,j 3 1+4 }Trucking yard or terminal, (41- f5-}-Privately -owned recycling facility. (b) No building or exterior use, except parking, may be erected, altered or conducted within three hundred fifty (3 feet of a residential district without a conditional use permit. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage. Passed by the Maplewood City Council on , 19929 kr /memo88.mem go /b -3 (5.1) 13 S NEW BUSINESS -4 a . Commercial Zoning Districts ordinance -4: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report �.� on recreational uses in the business commercial Zone. The ,r Commissioners discussed the commerical zoning classif and proposed changes in the ordinance. The Commissione agreed that no motor fuel stations maintenance garages, or parts thereof, should be allowed within 350 feet of a residential lot line. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance about land uses in the BC (business commercial), BC -M (business commercial mod SC (shopping center) , and M -1 (light manufacturing) districts with the requested corrections. Regarding item 3 on page 8 concerning indoor theaters not requiring conditional use permits, it is recommended that the City Council consider the issue of regulation of undesirable theaters, i.e. X- rated, with consideration of whether it would be a useful planning tool to have these theaters require a conditional use permit. Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes -- Allenspach, Anitzberger, Axdahl , Gerke , Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik The motion passed. b. Discussion: Follow -up to Meeting with the City Manager MIME. 4er401.rMw1 ~A ft� -3 1 .....-- -... LL — A L! ^ _ 1 1 oft 0 4 t. AGENDA NO. �' l AGENDA REPORT Action by Cmx?a ll.h ; IN.- Endorsed TO: City Manager Modif i ed....�, r Re J e ct a d_..., FROM: Finance Director t I)at e use RE QUOTES ON PROPERTY, LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE DATE: June 15, 1992 INTRODUCTION It is proposed that the present insurance coverages be renewed with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) and Hartford Insurance Company. Also, it is proposed that the deductible be increased to $50,000 per occurrence with an annual maximum of $200,000. BACKGROUND The City's present coverages expire June 30, 1992. On April 13, the City Council assigned markets to the Ekblad, Pardee & Bewell, Inc. and Hadtrath & Associates, Inc. agencies. Both of these agencies submitted proposals for property and liability insurance coverages. A proposal was also received directly from the LMCIT for workers compensation coverage. Our insurance consultant., Susan Bennett, Preferred Risk Consultants, has analyzed these proposals, and her report is attached. PREMIUMS Total premiums for the policy period beginning July 1, 1992 will decrease. The following is a breakdown of the premiums by category: LMCIT - workers' compensation LMCIT - property & liability Hartford - boiler & machinery Totals Current Polic $140,042 177,126 $322,322 Nev Alt. #1 $132,226 177,621 .=,154 $315,001 V Policy Alt. $132 139,751 5,154 $277,131 There are two alternatives for the new policy. The first alternative involves continuing our present deductibles of $25,000 per occurrence and $50,000 annual maximum. The second alternative involves increasing our deductibles to $50,000 per occurrence and $200,000 annual maximum. ANALYSIS A detailed report from Our consultant is attached. Key issues from this report are as follows. Regarding the workers compensation coverage, there are two options. a retrospective rating plan and a prospective rating plan. with both rating lans the initial premium would be P P $132,226. However, with the retrospective. (retro) plan, the premium would adjusted at the end of the policy period based on the amount of losses. If the losses are low, we would get a refund; if the losses are high, we would have to pay an additional premium. Our consultant believes the retro plan is the best option as the final premium would be approximately $47,498 less than the prospective rating plan based upon our past average losses. Regarding the property and liability coverages, I requested our insurance consultant to analyze the feasibility of a higher deductible. Page three of the consultant's report attached indicates that if we increase our annual deductible to $200,000 the premium savings will be approxi- mately $37,870 per year. In my opinion this is a reasonable risk. However, in order to minimize the impact on our General Fund budget of uninsured losses totaling $200,000 it is imperative that $200,000 of the fund balance be reserved to cover P otential uninsured losses. This account would be used in place of the General Fund contingency account for uninsured losses in excess of $250.. The $200,000 needed is available as the 12 -31 -91 fund balance was $622,633 higher than anticipated in the 1992 Budget. Regarding the boiler and machinery coverage, only one quotation was received. It was from Hartford Insurance Company for renewal of our present policy with no increase in the premium. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve the following: 1. Renewal of our present insurance coverages with the LMCIT for workers' compen- sation under a retrospective rating plan. 2. Renewal of our present insurance coverages with the LMCIT for property and liability coverages with a deductible of $50,000 per occurrence and $200,000 annual maximum. 3. A General Fund appropriation of $200,000 to cover uninsured losses instead of the contingency account. 4. Renewal of our present insurance coverages with Hartford Insurance Company for boiler and machinery items. INS /QUOTM.AGN Attachment PREFERRED ................... R I S K ................... CONSULTANTS June 10, 1992 Daniel F. Faust Finance Director City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: July 1, 1992 -93 Property /Casualty Insurance Renewal Dear Dan: Based upon the assignment of markets in April, attached find a summary of the proposals received. If you recall, Hadtrath & Associates, Inc. was assigned the LMCIT program, and other markets including Titan Indemnity, USF &G, and the Illinois Insurance Exchange, State Fund Mutual was also assigned for the workers' compensation. Ekblad Pardee & Bewell, Inc. was assigned Penco on the package, Hartford and Western National on the boiler coverage, and Auto Owners on the bond. Penco declined to quote the City per Jerry Ekblad' s letter of June 4. Penco indicated an inability to be competitive against the LMCIT program. Ekblad, Pardee & Bewell did provide a renewal quote on the boiler and machinery through Hartford. Other markets assigned were not presented. A LMCIT package renewal was received with an optional deductible plan offered, along with the LMCIT' s workers' compensation renewal and United Fire & Casualty bond renewal. The overall impact of the 1992 -93 proposed insurance coverages as currently written is a decrease in premium of $7,321. The LMCIT property coverage premiums including contractors' equipment and miscellaneous property, etc. have increased slightly this year. However, all property limits were increased with the exception of miscellaneous property limit which was reduced by approximately 16% or $124,,420, The building and contents values were increased by 3% at all locations with the exception of only a few along with the additions of the Monette properties and the MTCE building. EDP equipment values rose by approximately 50% or $208,460. The contractors' equipment limit increased from $661,281 to $832,108. Effective 1/1/92, the LMCIT has included an additional coverage endorsement to the property. Asbestos abatement is provided for a maximum limit of $ 000 per building, not to exceed $250,000 in any policy period for all buildings. "Full -time Expert Part -time Cost" .................... P.O. Box 47 -506 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 612/559 -3368 With a general increase in estimated operating expenditures, the general liability premium has remained stable with only a slight increase in the errors and omissions coverage cost. The "gallons of water pumped" figure used for rating purposes was substantially higher this year than last year's estimate, however, it is felt that this year's estimate more accurately reflects the exposure. The result would be an increase in premium. Although the premium worksheets were not yet available from Berkley Risk Services, in checking with an underwriting assistant, it was found that the gallons of water were not used in the general liability rating of the City. . It could be that because the data was not issued with the rest of the renewal information, it did not yet get included in the rating. The general liability charge last for the waterworks amounted to .$226. With the increase of gallons of water from 24,785,000 to 1,068,882,000, there could be an additional premium greater than charged last year. Because the City of Maplewood residents receive water from St. Paul and N. St. Paul and the City does not own the wells, this issue will be discussed with the underwriter to determine if the exposure will be handled differently. The current inverse condemnation coverage has been modified effective 1/15/92. The coverage includes "any land use regulation claim ". The loss limitation factor of 85% will apply to loss and loss adjustment expense including legal defense cost. This Land Use.Liability Endorsement is added at no additional premium. The LMCIT s auto prem has decreased this year by $1,401, even though four ( 4 ) additional vehicles are now covered. Glass, bond, and boiler and machinery coverage have, for the most part, remained constant. The most significant cost differential this year is in the workers' compensation. This yea r' s deposit premium has decreased by $7,816, despite the increase ��� ���e �:r�:al pay�o� l '�y $107,460. This is dk�c in part, to the general decrease in rates of the classification codes which apply, as well as the reduction of the experience modification factor from .78 to .74. The City has had very good loss experience in the workers' compensation area with the exception of one large loss a year, and a substantial loss in 1986- 87 This particular year; 1986-87, however, is no longer a part of the City's experience modification calculation. The particular loss which involves ongoing temporary partial disability payments should still be monitored periodically on its status to end further payments. As the enclosed summary indicates, disregarding the one unusual claim in 1986 -87, the retro program. still offers a substantial savings to the City. I have also attached a summary of the 1992 workersf, compensation changes for your information. I have attended several seminars recently with regard to the changes and the enclosed summary seems to be the best presented to date. An excess liability quote was again submitted this year by the LMCIT for the City's review. It has not been purchased in the past due to the City's loss experience and the cost prohibitiveness of the coverage. The cost has increased this year over last year, and the City's experience indicates a remote possibility of the excess limits being reached in the future. As mentioned above, an optional deductible plan was presented by the LMCIT on the package. The City's current deductible is $25,000 /occurrence, $50,000 /annual aggregate with a $1,000 maintenance deductible which applies should the annual aggregate be reached. The deductible applies to all the LMCIT's lines of coverage, excluding the bond and excess liability coverages. The deductible plan Offered is $50,000 /occurrence, $200,000 /annual aggregate, $1,000 maintenance deductible. This would result in a savings over the current program of $37,,870. Attached also f ind a summary of claims data for the past thirteen (13) . years on all lines of LMCIT coverages excluding workers' compensation. Based upon the loss runs provided, the average loss year considering these thirteen years is $61,364. This, however, includes one exceptionally poor loss year; 1980, and two other years which had more activity than usual. One claim alone in 1980 accounted for $293,051 of the total claims for the year of $345,54.5. Deleting .his claim from the average, the average loss year decreases to $38,822. With the exception of only a few, the City's experience indicates that there have been only fourteen (14) claims which were paid /res erved for $ or more for the past thirteen years. Of these claims, 64% were general liability claims. The general liability premium accounts for 66% of the total LMCIT premium, based upon the 1992 -93 proposed renewal. Based upon the average loss year, it appears that the current $ annual aggregate deductible is seldom reached. Some considerations to keep in mind, however, is that the property and equipment lines of coverage are included in this option. These lines of coverage account for a small proportion of the total premium, however, substantial values are involved, especially at locations where the property values are concentrated. The City's cash flow needs and restrictions also should be reviewed before making a decision. If accepting the option, the City would be looking at an additional $150,000 annual aggregate risk for a savings of $37,870. Again, averages indicate that the $200,000 annual aggregate deductible would not likely be reached. I would be happy to look into a variable of the option or different combination of deductible such as a lower property and physical damage deductible versus a higher deductibbe on all liability coverages. Please let me know if there are any concerns or questions with regard to the renewal. A departmental premium allocation I will be completed upon receiving the rating worksheets. Sincerely, D RISK CONSULTANTS tt, ARM, CIC 4 .. ` A CITY OF MAPLEWOOD July 1, 1992 -93 Property /Casualty Renewal Property Limit: $13,757,55 @ 90% B 1 kt , Agreed Amount Special, Replacement Cost Deductible: $25,000/Occ. $50,000 /Agg. $ 1,000 /Maint. Company: LMCIT EDP Equipment & Media Limits: $409,610 Equip. $ 1,0.00 Media $ 10,000 Extra Exp. Deductible: All Lines Agg. Company: LMCIT Valuable Papers Limit: $ 30,000 City Mall Deductible: All Lines Agg. Company: LMCIT Inland Marine Limit: $661,281 Cont.Equip. $770,815 Misc..Equip. $139.r939 Voting Mach. $ 7,500 LE Bailee $ 10,000 Mech.Tools $ 20,000 Fine Arts Deductible: All Lines Agg. Company: LMCIT Comp.General Liability Limits: $600,000 BI,PD,& Pers.Injury Deductible: All Lines Agg. Claims Made Company: LMCIT Comprehensive Auto Limit: $600,000 CSL $600,000 UN /UM Deductible: All Lines Agg, Comp.& Coll. 87 Vehicles Company: LMCIT Current Renewal 1992 -93 New Limits 1992 -93 $18,692 $14,520,726 19,634 Inc. 618,070 Incl. Incl. Incl. 6 6 832,108 646,395 118,195 118,086 22,946 21,545 91 vehicles I Errors & Omissions Limit: $600,000 .Deductible: All Lines Agg. Retro Date: 7/1/81 Claims Made Company: LMCIT Glass Location: Nature Center Company: LMCIT B.- Faithful Perf . Blkt Position Limit: $50,000 all employees Company: United Fire & Casualty Sub -Total Boiler & Machinery Limit: $500,000 /Accident $ 1,000 Water Damage $ 1,000 Ammonia Contam. $ 5,000 Expediting Exp. $ 25,000 Extra Expense Deductibbe: $500 Company: Hartford Workers' Compensation Limit: Statutory Experience Mod .78 Company: LMCIT Totals 9 9 14 14 1 1 177,126 177,621 5 5 140,042 Exp. Mod .74 65,820 Min. 202,404 Max. 322,322 132,226 62,146 190,870 315,001 I OPTIONS Umbrella Liability Limit: $1,000,000 $ 10,000 SIR Currently do not carry coverage Deductible LMCIT Deductible of $50,000./200,000 /1,000 $ 79,088 Non - Waiver 109,935 Waiver $139,751 Annual Premium (Savings of $37,870) CITY OF MAPLEWOOD July 1, 1992 -93 LMCIT Workers' Compensation Rewewal Retro Option: .Minimum - $ 62,146 Maximum - $190,870 Total Paid Losses 1991 -92 1990 -91 1989 -90 1988 -89 1987 -88 1986 -87 1985 -86 $ 39,651 (7/1/91 - 3/1/92) $ 25,886 $ 36,670 $ .2,659 $ 14,680 $307,921 $ 25,361 In 1986 -87, one claim accounted for $300,272 of the total $307,921, Excluding this particular claim from the claims, the City's average total annual claims for a six year period (excluding the current year since it is not a full year) is $18,818. Using this average for the upcoming year, the City's potential savings is approximately $47,498 from the standard premium. Including the total.claims for the year 1986 -87 would result in a premium approximately $46,088 below the maximum of 190,870 or $144,782. 6/92 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Total Year Total Incurred Losses 1980 $ 345,545 (one claim @ $293,051) Closed 1981 22,552 All Closed 1982 55,354 All Closed 1983 29,956 All Closed 1984 No losses indicated 1985 23,100 1 Open 1986 46,453 All Closed 1987 108,680 1 Open 1988 9,058 All Closed 1989 5,644 All Closed 1990 111,557 3 Open 1991 29,834 4 Open 1992 10 (As of 4/92) 3 Open $ 797,733 / 13 = 61,364 Loss Average $ 504,682 / 13 = 38,822 Loss Average # Claims 10,000 & over 14 total General Liability 9 (66% of total LMCIT premium) Auto Liability 3 ( 8% of total LMCIT premium) Bond 2 # Claims 50,000 & over 3 total General Liability 1 Bond 2 6/92 Action by C ouPt` I Endorsed, Nodifie MEMORANDUM Rejected ----- To: Michael A. McGuire, Cit Mana From: Robert D. Ode Director of Parks & Recreatloo Sub]: Award of Bids For Pleasantview Park (1100 M.arnie) Date: June 15, 1992 Introduction The Park and Recreation Commission has been followin the Park Plannin Process as -previousl discussed with the Cit Council, We have proceeded throu the initiation of the project sta surve of the communit the hirin of an architect, public hear� in f inal plans, and we have now proceeded to re that the Cit Council approve the award of bi ds for development of Pleas- antview Park. Two separate bids have been taken for Pleasantview Park site improvements. The first bid is for General Site Improvements,, and the second bid is for Plantin in the park. The Cit Council is re to award the bid for Proposal #1 to the firm of Barber Construction, and for Proposal #2 to Midland Nurser Back As the project pro it became apparent that there were two separate developments takin place as far as the site improve- ments. We, therefore, decided that it was in our best interest to have a bid for General Site Improvements, which include such items as the trail construction,, tennis courts, basketball court, parkin lot, backstop, pla e area, tables, g rill, and a shelter, etc. The second bid deals with the location of plant- in In the park and re a contractor who deals with nurser stock. The Maplewood Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the bids on June 15, 1992, and recommends to the Cit Council the award of .bid to Barber Construction for General Site Improvements and Midland Nurser for Plantin Attached are the bid tabulations. Soil explorations have indi- cated seams of cla under the asphalt areas. The bids for ..General Site Improvements includes a q uantit y of materials to be removed.and replaced. Since the exact amount is unknown, there will,be an adjustment in the contract after in p lace measurements are made. Final adjustments in the contracts will come throu Chan Orders, Recommendation It is re that the C it y Council award the bids f or improve- ments to Pleasantview Park to the lowest bidders Proposal #1 ..General Si te Improvements to Barber construction in the amount of $192,173.35, and Proposal #2 Plantin to Midland Nurser at the bid price of $28,953.00. Contract documents will be prepared f or .si b authorized personnel. Funds for the General Site Improvements and Plantin are to be authorized from available ,.Nei PAC Funds and the balance from the Commercial PAC monies, PROPOSAL #1 - G BID TAB PLEASANNIEW PARK PROJECT CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA DATE: 6/11/92 FROM: BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. CONTACT: JEFF SCHOENBAUER PHONE: (612) 832 - 9475 FAX: (612) 832 -9542 BIDDERS LIST: A MwraarrnRS NeuF ain ic,nv mon SEALED BIDS WERE OPENED AND RECORDED 11:00 A.M. ON JUNE 11, 1992, IN TH$ CITY HALL MAPLEWOOD ROOM IN PRESENCE OF: R.D. ODEGARD, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION AND JEFF SCHOENBAUZR, BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD* t2ACG 01f% TnTA1 Al Tcnw1ATC n1n 'r^rAt nnAILor% T/%T1a 1 N.W. Asphalt z Monette conscnxflon 3 Buck Blacktop, Inc YES Zo + Z me- Tw WNW 4 Bituminous Consuftkq 5 Arteka /Natural Green 8 F.M. Frattalone Laurie 7 Veit &Company 2 I 0 61K Z Z `7 2�{4 �° 8 John Alexander Co. 9 Modem Design Fencing 10 L.D. Service 11 Blacktop Repels Services 12 Arrlgoni Brothers 13 American Surfaces 2 * 2 16 Shhpobee Guiders 17 ear Construction • IBS `773 =--' I.G boo qz 1 3 e odlund Construction YES (oq 4.010 �l 19 z Z 19 Falls Garden Center ' 20 21 22 e� PROPOSAL #2- PLANTING BID TAB PLEASANTVIEW PARK PROJECT CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA DATE: 6/11/92 FROM: - BRAUER &ASSOCIATES, LTD. CONTACT: JEFF SCHOENBAUER PHONE: (612) 832 -9475 FAX: (612) 832.9542 BIDDERS LIST: afE f:[1NTR0[ NelulP ctm ccr"M 1e1ry ieci� SEALED BIDS WERE OPENED AND RECORDED 11:00 A.M. ON JUNE 11, 1992 IN THE CITY HALL MAPLEWOOD ROOM IN PRESENCE OF: R.D. ODEGA.RD, DIRECTOR OF PARRS & RECREATION AND JEFF SCSOENBAUER, BRAUER & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 4z - - ��r��•n� - o�v � Ih 4 0MANU 1 V IAL uno Lakes Nursy 2 Minnesota Valley Inc. 96� 3 Midland Nursery Z15 3 4 Timber -N Turf 5 Arteka /Natural Green 14 6 Hoffman & McNamara � (� 0*3 7 � �'- 7 Greenwortcs Y � Z Z: G � '7 � �`/ '� .30 q6 -1 � 8 Fans Garden Center 9 10 11 4z Action by Council: Endorse )Iodif ie - MEMORANDUM De j e et e d Date To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D, Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio Sub*: Hiring Landscape Architect For Park Plantings ntings Date: June 10, 1992 Introduction The City Council on April 13 1992 authorized � , the Park and Rec reation Commission to interview landscape architects for assis- tance and cooperation in plantings within the parks. The Park and Recreation Commission interviewed two of the landscape dscape archi- tect firms that responded to the request for proposals r q p p prepared by staff. The Commission is recommending that a contract with the city and the firm of Barton - Aschman Associates be accepted. Background Over the past four he con years, the city Park System has seen t - struction and development of Playcrest, Sherwood, Vista Hills arks and Harvest ', Geranium and Hillside neighborhood ark parks, t community park, and Hazelwood Soccer Complex. In August of 1991, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended to the City Council that we proceed with the development of our Park System with a large Tree and Shrub Planting Program. • g g The Park and Recreation Commission recommended the hiring of a landscape architect and the City Council requested the Commission e , hiring n to investigate other alterna- tives to a landscape architect. On April 13, 1992, the Park and Recreation Commission resented the results of their stud p y as to alternatives for hiring a land- scape architect to the City Council. The City Council approved the interviewing f a landscape PP g pe architect for assistance and cooperation of plantings in the parks. Requests for ro osals were immediately prepared b P P Yp p y staff and distributed to landscape i architect firms n the Twin City area. Results of the firms responding to the RFP were tabulated by staff. The staff recom- mended interviewing the firms of Brauer & Associates ociates and Barton - Aschman. Interviews were completed on June 1. The Commission was impressed by both firms, and felt that both were very competent and capable of being able to carry out the large plan qu far proposals that we outlined in our request g p . Jeanne Ewald, Chairperson of the Park and Recreation Commission made the motion to recommend to the City ouncil the Y hiring of Barton Aschman Associates, Inc. (Barry Warner ) as landsca architect for the design of seven park plantings. The fee is not t to exceed $11,200, and for work over $200,000 - 6 %; seconded b Bonnie Qualley; Ayes: All, Attached is the contract between Barton- Aschman and the city for their services. Our plan is to have the seven arks ( Harvest , p Hazelwood, Geranium, Sherwood, Maplewood Heights, Vista Hills, Hillside) designed for planting. The designs will be presented g to the Park and Recreation Commission and community at one meet- ing. Following the changes and recommendations b the community y and Commission, the design will be updated and presented to the Park and Recreation Commission for their approval. Bids and City specifications will then be prepared with the Council award- ing the bid. Part of the plantings will take place this fall and the.balance in the spring when certain species will grow better. Recommendation It is requested that the City.Council authorize entering into o a contract with Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. for their services as landscape architect for the plantings of seven arks in the City y of Maplewood at the base fee of not to exceed $ and for work over $200,000 - 6%9 (As per attached contract) Funds for this contact are to be authorized from the Commercial PAC Account. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA AND BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 1992, by and between the CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA (hereinafter referred to as the "CLIENT'), and BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation with offices at 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350, Minneapolis, MN 55401. WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, the CLIENT desires to prepare planting design plans for seven (7) parks; (hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT); and . WHEREAS, the CLIENT desires to engage the services of the CONSULTANT to furnish technical and professional assistance in connection with the preparation of this study, and the CONSULTANT has signified its willingness to furnish technical and professional service to the CLIENT; and WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents to the CLIENT that it has sufficient expertise to enable it to provide such advice and assistance to the CLIENT; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows: A. SCOPE OF CONSULTANT'S SERVICES The CONSULTANT agrees to perform in a good and professional manner those services described in Attachment A, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated in this AGREEMENT. All documents, work papers, maps, and study material produced by the CONSULTANT in the performance of these services become the property of the CLIENT on completion of this agreement. B. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT Existing information, survey basemapping, data, reports and records which are useful for carrying out the work on this project and which are reasonably accessible to the CLIENT shall be promptly furnished to the CONSULTANT. The completion of the services to be performed by the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT is contingent upon the timely receipt from the CLIENT, at no cost to the CONSULTANT, of data and reports described above. The CLIENT will assist the CONSULTANT by assembling and promptly making available such information as CLIENT may have pertinent to the PROJECT, including any previous reports and other data relative to the execution of the PROJECT. If, by reason of any fault of CLIENT, materials or services to be provided by the CLIENT are not made available to the CONSULTANT in a timely manner, the CONSULTANT may, at its option, stop work on the PROJECT until such materials or services are provided. C. MEETINGS The CONSULTANT shall attend up to two evening Park and Recreation Commission meetings and one City Council meeting as part of the PROJECT, described in Attachment A. These meetings shall include workshops, formal presentations, and public meetings. Attendance at additional meetings will be subject to the provisions of Article K of this agreement. D. CHANGES The CLIENT may, from time to time, require or request changes in the scope of services to the CONSULTANT to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any appropriate increase or decrease in the amount of compensation, which are mutually agreed upon, shall be incorporated in written amendments to this AGREEMENT. E. CONSULTANT'S COMPENSATION The CONSULTANT shall be compensated for services rendered under the terms of AGREEMENT on the basis of CONSULTANT'S hourly rates (see Attachment B) for the staff time devoted to the PROJECT plus reimbursement of actual cost for directly related job expenses such as travel, subsistence, printing, etc. The maximum cost for CONSULTANT services and expenses, other than for out -of- town travel, under this AGREEMENT is $11,200. The CONSULTANT will not exceed this sum without specific written authorization from the CLIENT or an amendment to this AGREEMENT. The sum, however, will be subject to a six (b) percent upward adjustment if the total construction cost exceeds $200,000. The CONSULTANT will also be reimbursed for out -of -town travel and per diem for trips agreed upon by the CLIENT in advance of actual travel. F. METHOD OF PAYMENT The CONSULTANT shall submit monthly itemized invoices for costs incurred for staff time and xP out-of-pocket expenses on the PROJECT during the billing period. P CLIENT shall P ay all invoices, within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. Total billings for services rendered under this AGREEMENT will not exceed the sum of $11,200 without express written authorization from the CLIENT. G. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The services of CONSULTANT will begin upon delivery to the CONSULTANT of an executed copy of this AGREEMENT, and shall, absent causes beyond the control of the CONSULTANT, be completed on or before June 1, 19940 H. TERMINATION The CLIENT shall have the right to terminate the AGREEMENT by written notice to the CONSULTANT at least seven (7) days prior to the specified effective date of such termination. In such event, all finished and unfinished documents and work papers prepared by the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT shall become the property of the CLIENT. On receipt of said documents and work papers by the CLIENT the CONSULTANT shall receive compensation and reimbursement for the work actually performed up to the date of termination in accordance with Paragraph E of the AGREEMENT less payment of any compensation previously paid. I. NONDISCRIMINATION Equal Employment Opportunity In connection with the carrying out of the AGREEMENT provided herein, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, national origin, age, marital status, or receipt of public assistance. J. EXCUSABLE DELAYS The CONSULTANT shall not be in default by reason of any failure in .performance of this AGREEMENT in accordance with its terms (including any failure by the CONSULTANT to make progress in the prosecution of the work hereunder which endangers such performance) if such failure arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT. Such causes may include, but are not restricted or limited to, acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of government in either its sovereign or contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, and unusually severe weather, but in every case, the failure to perform must be beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the CONSULTANT, and the CONSULTANT shall not be deemed to be in default. K. EXTRA WORK If requested and authorized in writing by the CLIENT, the CONSULTANT will be available to furnish, or obtain from others, extra work of the following types: 1. Extra work due to changes in the general scope of the study, including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity or character of the work items. 2. Additional or extended services, including study administration due to: (a) the prolongation of the AGREEMENT time through no fault of the CONSULTANT; (b) the acceleration of the work schedule involving services beyond normal working hours; or (c) nondelivery of any reasonably accessible materials, data, or other information to be furnished by the CLIENT or others not within the control of the CONSULTANT. 3. Additional services and costs necessitated by travel required of the CONSULTANT other than the visits of the PROJECT as specified in Attachment A, Scope of Services. 4. Other additional services requested and authorized by the CLIENT which are not otherwise P rovided for under this AGREEMENT. 5. Attendance at additional meetings beyond those made part of the AGREEMENT. The costs and schedule for completing extra work authorized by the CLIENT shall be subject to negotiation between the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph D (Changes) of this Agreement L.. DELIVERABLES The CONSULTANT shall provide to the CLIENT those drawings and specifications identified in the Scope of Services (Attachment A) as end products. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CLIENT and CONSULTANT have executed this AGREEMENT on the date and year first above written. CLIENT: CONSULTANT: CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MN BARTON- ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. B _ By VW Title: Prince P a Ass i and Its Contracting ATTEST: 6•q •Q2., Date Date ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1: The seven park parcels that will receive landscape plantings BASEMAP have basemaps of varying quality and scales. A number of PREPARATION these basemaps were provided as a part of the park's original construction documents. Others represent master plans or boundary delineations of lesser detail and specificity. This task will establish basemapping for the seven parks' landscape plans of similar format such that a set of landscape construction documents can result. The City of Maplewood will provide basemaps for reformatting by Barton- Aschman. TASK 2: Barton- Aschman, with assistance and participation by the city, FIELD REVIEW will conduct on -site Meld review for each of the seven specified sites, after the basemaps have been prepared, to become better acquainted with each site's physical characteristics. In addition, inconsistencies with the prepared basemapping will be noted and revisions made if possible. The field reviews will take into consideration specific site characteristics including: • Topography • Existing vegetation • Soil characteristics • Edge conditions • Obvious landscape requirements • Compatibility with park functions and park design intent • Traffic patterns • In -place development Notes and sketches will be taken during the field visits for later use by the consulting team and city decision- makers. TASK 3: Graphic concept plans that portray proposed locations for CONCEPTUAL plantings will be completed. These concepts will be LANDSCAPE PLANS formulated from information gained on the basemaps, field review, and input from city staff. The concept plans will portray tentative tree locations, shrub massings, and intended species. Preliminary cost estimates will be arrived upon for review and comment by the city. Recommendations may be made by the consultant at this time as to adjusting the city's priority for budgeting by park facility. TASK 4: The landscape concepts arrived upon in Task 3 will be .PARK COMMISSION reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission and the REVIEW/COMM UNITY p ubli c to determine consistency with community priorities OPEN HOUSE and response to facility needs. These conceptual graphics serve as an effective means to stimulate discussion and input from decision - makers. The conceptual plans will be shared with the Commission at one of their regularly scheduled monthly meetings. An open house for the public will be scheduled as a part of the same evening's agenda at which time landscape concepts could be reviewed by the public in an informal, open house format. Comments from the public would be received by the Park Commissioners and the consultant. Comments received during the evening would be reviewed by the Commission to determine any appropriate changes in the proposed planting schemes. TASK 5: Reproducible plans, specifications, and final estimates of PREPARATION OF construction costs will be generated by the consultant. These BIDDING documents will serve as the bidding package and legal DOCUMENTS contract documents. Plan documents will show, drawn to scale, intended plant locations and species to be installed. Specifications will direct the contractor as to procedures for installation and other qualifying restrictions. Details will be employed as necessary to ensure a quality landscape project. Final cost estimates will be provided on a unit quantity basis, thereby allowing for adjustments consistent with available city project. This information will be reviewed and comments received from city staff and the Park and Recreation Commission prior to bidding. TASK 6: The construction documents prepared in Task 5 will serve as FORMAL the focus of contractor bidding. Barton- Aschman will assist CONTRACTOR the city in completing advertisement for bids, distribution of BIDDING plan sets, response to contractor questions, opening of bids, and recommendation of a contractor award. The City Council will act on the award of bid prior to contract formalization. TASK 7: Barton- Aschman will assist the City of Maplewood during the CONSTRUCTION construction sequence for conformance with the intended SERVICES design, the specified materials, and quality of installation. The contractor must be monitored closely during the construction P rocess. Barton - Aschman will review and adjust contractor stakin g for plant locations to maintain consistency with the design intent. The installation process will be monitored for consisten cy with contract specifications. A post installation inspection will be made as a part of the construction services. The consultant will review contractor pay requests and make recommendation to the city. The contractor's agreement will include a one -year warranty for replacement of an plant mortality. Therefore, a one -year P y inspection will be made to determine conformance with the guarantee and acknowledgement of any replacements. .T dwwp� / MEMORANDUM Action by Council: TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Commun SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan DATE: June 12, 1992 INTRODUCTION I have attached the update of the council to approve. Endorse ity Development Modified.. Update Re j ected.,..,,. Date Comprehensive Plan for the City BACKGROUND The City started work on this plan 3 -1 years ago. Since that time, we have made many changes. In 1990, the Council started a series of hearings on the land use plans. The Planning Commission and Council made changes to many of the neighborhoods. The Council also changed the land use designations to zoning classifications. As an example, the old RL (residential low density) classification is now R - (single-family residential) . This change should avoid the confusion caused by two sets of classifications for the same property. The land use maps have not changed since the Council approved them, except the names of the land use designations. After the Council finished approving the changes in the land use plans, the Planning Commission started work on the plan text. They thoroughly edited the text after receiving comments from the HRA, HRC and Park and Recreation Commission. Each of these groups have approved their parts of the Plan. The boards and commissions made editing, rather than policy changes. We have reduced the length of the Plan from 190 to 97 pages. The Plan is also easier to read. We have updated the Plan with new information, such as the 1990 Census. In 1991, the Council changed the density tables to reduce maximum allowed densities. The Planning Commission decided not to hold neighborhood meetings, because the Commission and Council have already held hearings on the land use map changes. on June 2, the City Council held a special forum on the Plan. I have included the changes from that meeting in the attached copy. DISCUSSION The new plan is a big improvement over the current plan. The new plan is shorter and easier to read and use. The new plan has been updated to reflect current policies. While we can expect changes to the plan as the City changes, the basic document should serve as an effective foundation for many years to come. The next step should be for the Council to approve the Plan. We must then send it to the Metropolitan Council and adjacent cities for their review. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Plan, subject to the review of the Metropolitan council and adjacent cities, go /b- 3 :memo23.mem (4-v15) Attachments: 1. 1992 Comprehensive Plan Update 2. Planning Commission minutes 2 i Maplewood Planning Commission - Minutes of 3 -2 -92 1.1 (2 The City Council shall review this p it one year from he date of approval, based on the rocedures in the Cl code. (3) The s ool shall turn the to is court lig hts off b g Y 10:00 p: Only the schoo shall use the tennis court lights. (4) The school shal not e the area between the tennis courts and pond a d he west lot line as a track or route for running d shall be limited to fall meets. (5) The City Counc may re ire that -the Academy build a driveway to ebe Road th ugh the School District's property if he Academy buy the School District's building: (6) The Co cil may require that the chool chain the weste y access for evening events 'f they become a pro em. Commi loner Anitzberger seconded Ayes - -An berger, Axdahl, Fi er, Frost, Gerke, Pearso Rossbach, S igmund ik, Sin he motion passed. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS b. Comprehensive Plan The Commission reviewed the Plan with some changes and requested staff make the corrections. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan update with the changes requested at tonight's meeting. Commissioner Rossbach seconded The motion passed.. I�SITOR PRESEN NS The ere isitor presentations. Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Z..o I MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN DRAFT MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JUNE, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................... 1 — Purpose . . . . . . - Regional Context ......................... 1 - Community and Neighborhood Identity ....0000. 2 -Figure 1 -City of Maplewood ................ 3 II. HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY 4 III. GOALS OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0000. 7 -Goals ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 IV. NATURAL FEATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 -Introduction ............................. 9 - Figure 2 - Soil Limitations 11 - Figure 3 - Tree Cover .................... 12 - Figure 4 -Wetlands ....................... 13 - Figure 5 - Floodplain ...................... 14 V. ANALYSIS OF POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 -Analysis . ............................... 15 - Population Characteristics 0 0 0 0 0 & 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 15 - Table 1 - Population, Household and Employment Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - Table 2 - Population Characteristics . 0 . 0 0 0 . . . . . 17 - Population if Fully Developed 19 VI• LAND USE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - Purpose ....................... 00 *0 0 . . 00 20 -Goals .......................... 0 0 0 0 . . . . 20 - General Development Policies ...... 9 . 0 . . 0 .. 0 21 - Residential Development Policies . 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . 23 - Commercial and Industrial Development Policies . 23 #2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) - Existing Land Use. 0 0 0 . 0 . 06 so 00 . . . . . . . . . 24 - Table 3 - Land Use Trends, 1975 - 1984......... 25 - Figure 6 - Existing Land Use, 1991 0000....... 26 - Figure 7 - Undeveloped Land -- Planned Residential Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 - Figure .8 - Undeveloped Land -- Planned Commercial - Industrial Areas 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 - Land Use Plan .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 - Neighborhood Planning Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 - Table 4 - Neighborhood Land Use Plan Legend 0000 31 - Land Use Plan Definitions .......... 0 . . . . . . 32 -Residential Land Uses ................... 32 - Table 5 - Estimated Persons Per Dwelling Unit and Planned Maximum Density of Dwelling Units 0000. 33 - Commercial Land Uses ................... 34 - Industrial Land Uses .................... 35 - Land Use Action Plan ................... 35 - Table 6 - Land Use Action Plan ............. 36 - Table 7 - Planned Land Use Acreage, 1991 0000.. 37 - Table 8 - Fully Developed Population by Neighborhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0000.. 38 - Figure 9 - Neighborhood Planning Area Boundaries 39 - Figures 10 -22 - Neighborhood Land Use Plan Maps . 40 -52 VII. HOUSING PLAN ...................... 9 53 - Purpose 53 - Housing Stock ........ 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 - Table 9 - Housing Characteristics . 0 0 . 0 0 . . . . . . 54 - Table 10 - Subsidized Housing Units, 1990 . 0 0 0 0 . 58 - Table 11 - Section 8 and Section 236 Units ...... 58 - Housing Issues .. 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 61 - Housing Goals and Policies 62 - Housing Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 - Neighborhood Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 - Figure 23 - Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration 66 - Table 12 - Housing Action Plan ............. 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) VIII. PARKS PLAN ........................ 69 - Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 - Goals . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Objectives ........................... 69 70 - Classifications and Definitions 9999... , .. , .. , 70 - Existing Facilities and Programs ............. 71 - Figure 24 - Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 72 - Table 13 -. City of Maplewood Parks Inventory ry 73 - Park Facilities Standards ... 9 0 . 0 0 . . . . 00.00. 76 - Table 14 - Parks Facilities Standards .......... 76 - Application of Standards in Maplewood 0 . 0 0 0 9999 76 - Table 15 - Application of Service - Area Park 95 Standards . 0 0 0 0 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Table 16 - Application of Population -Based Park 79 Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Figure 25 - Parks and Recreational Facilities Plan .. 79 80 - Parks Policy Recommendations . 0 0 0 . . . . 0 . . . . . 81 - Parks Action Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 -Table 17 -Parks Action Plan ............... 83 IX. TRANSPORTATION PLAN 00 0 a ease 0 0 0 85 - Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Transportation Issues .................... 85 85 -Major Street System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9999.. 85 - Figure 26 - Major Street System and LRT Plan 9999 87 - Figure 27 - Typical Street Sections . . . . . . . . . . . 88 - Street System Policies ................... 89 - Travel Demand Management Policies .......... 89 - Transit Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 - Bicyclist and Pedestrian Policies ............. 92 - Figure 28 - Bikeways /Trails Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 - Table 18 - Transportation Action Plan ... 0 0 0 . 0 . . 95 X. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND SANITARY SEWER PLANS 97 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan is to help the public and private sector in planning for physical, social and economic development. The Comprehensive Plan will: • Guide future growth and development in an orderly manner. • Define the proper functional relationships between different types of land uses. • Help to coordinate public and private sector decisions. • Encourage orderliness and economy in City government. • Establish a framework to guide and involve citizen participation in City government. • Provide for a sense of community and neighborhood identity. The Plan is a guideline rather than a law. The City may make minor deviations from the Plan, which do not violate its intent, without amending the Plan. REGIONAL CONTEXT The Comprehensive Plan cannot just consider what is happening within the City's borders. It must also consider the plans of the surrounding cities and the region. The regional plan is prepared by the Metropolitan Council. It is called the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF). Maplewood has considered the MDIF policies in preparing its Comprehensive Plan. Any amendments to the City Plan must be sent to the Metropolitan Council for their review. This process assures that the City Plan will be consistent with regional policies. COMMUNTI'Y AND NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY A concern throughout this plan is the encouraging and strengthening of neighborhood and community identity. Lack of Identity Factors contributing to a lack of community and neighborhood identity include: • The long and narrow "L- shaped" physical layout of the City. This results in neighborhoods that are physically closer to adjacent cities than to most of Maplewood. � The number of limited access highways which divide the City. They limit community, social, political and economic interaction. • The natural barriers, such as the chain of lakes. They separate the western part of Maplewood from the rest of the City. • The division of Maplewood into three independent school districts, which also serve other cities. • The absence of a post office, combined with the fact there are four zip codes assigned to the City because of its shape. DevelWing a Positive Sense of Id I The City has designed the policies in this Plan, among other things, to encourage City and neighborhood identity. The City can reinforce these efforts by: • Having neighborhood informational meetings and public hearings as changes to the land use plan are proposed. These are to be part of the Comprehensive Plan revision and adoption process. • Continuing to provide a community newsletter with information about City affairs and current activities. • Continued development and strengthening of the neighborhood parks system. • Broadcasting City meetings on cable television. 2 S.T.N. 36 CO. Ito e ROSELANN AYE. LARPENTEUt AVE. t7- virT . N • � .. a � w «. s City of Maplewood 1.6% CO. RD. C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN W 7L:�� (t 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH K I •. N t � r NARYLAM AVE. ST I LLWATER RD. NINNENANA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.N. 12/1.94 UPPER AFTON RD. LOWER AFTON RD. — LONDIN LN. - NAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. N I GIIIOOD AVE. as. _ F „ N tJ • J ... N W N i i Fgure 1 o]mmvA1o]=1mm1mff4Ko ... 4 �: '�•, � Qom•._ `j; � � • � - Aftm j ' •�!"�� f•' �f1•�t ( 1 , 1 _'� 1 ' ;'r 24'� -� IS Q �! -•a► _ "`'". �1t ' i. -,. Iw GIIIIII NOWIIIIIIIIW 1 1 �_ �� f t � t '' ', yy" • �� � � � ►�1�0 1 i1 .f + i Ir � / a f 1 7 �M• T ar • :Z 1 {�L dh • t- _ _ ' -- - - - • c - • . � -'.' .rte - ..."�.�. - "-�"'_ • �; l � "- r fsaz= •- a'..�...Z: Iw'• .� �i ao.v� =� �_+ i•"� . - - _ _ - I f �.. - air �� . .► Z•� . � "r •_r- _ 1 WTI .,1.f/�tt .�� i �- �� �.. �- � s -�� � � Il��' __� �[z� - � . r rT t •R ... I � ► •) r { �� \ ( � 1 �' r �� � I 'J+` \l �• � f/ , � � r• � - '_ � _- _ _ _ _ _ _ � - _ Z•1 • I � . �. � � �. Q �i xRS; _Vz_ T - '�� R - - - '�-- �..zr �_` •��• - � '�►L� � 1/ �, { / � �� Y 1� .1 I � '„` \ �� �I t � �'1 � � /�'� / 1 _'t►'T ,c � __ r1. '" �_- __�••.`� -- r '�� �(r � � `\ �f .�� � f � � '!� �r, t F � � � �� r 1 '� + .1. {I ` ?'• � �'1.� .- '' :-. - _ _� .G '� - = ��� _ -_ - �? �"'_�..'� I �� � I �`, '� S ' ��, � 1 � �I :! ,/j � " � ' t j f, .t ./�'A'U.I i ! ' f ! (� •_ r. v_ •��7.y2�r� a .�1: - �!�7�� _ � i � , {. ' � "t rl •�i 1 r•r,I. 1 I ; ` ,9f.! .1 "; 0 ����T •• _ `-•�' :,.. -_ G. - j ,- .. _ ` I , +I ," ' ,� ''.+ 111! I TO y +�� l '1r ► ► r , r�,, } I ���f '��'� h r ( ,I .I ( ►1 1 1 ( J c -' - r.r'�r/.- -'� r . y� F:•i� ���. w{ '�. 1 1 1• v fT�11�,.����` r.�` `� i�! f f��.1 ' r `'-•� t3�C ,t �' Est _ _ j. . { & Ll I Lo %SECTIOM OF THE FORMER BIN AND SoV LPM T' tUFuf FROST AND EM(iIISH STlIEETV 0 HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY The land in what is now Maplewood was originally under the control of the Sioux Indian nation. This land became available to settlers after 1837 when the United States government purchased all the Sioux lands east of the Mississippi; but development was slow. An 1849 census of Little Canada and St. Anthony (Minneapolis) reports: males, 352; females, 219. The first recorded settler in Maplewood was Benjamin Gervais, who farmed and built a gristmill on Gervais Creek in 1844. So many other French Canadians followed him that, in 1858, when Minnesota became a state and the townships were organized, the one north of St. Paul was called New Canada Township. This included parts of Maplewood. The settlers' farms, for which they had paid the government $2 an acre, were scattered along Maple Street (now called County Road C), and near the old Indian Trail, (now called Hazelwood Street). They built a log schoolhouse in 1850 at County Road C and White Bear Avenue, and they hired a teacher, Eliza La Boure. However, the Sioux warned off four families who tried to fell trees and build cabins that in 1850. The Sioux insisted the land was still theirs. Not until the Battle Creek fight in 1853, when the Chippewa drove the Sioux south to Newport, were the settlers able to return. Between 1850 and 1870, New Canada Township became settled with pioneers of French and German decent. In 1870, the industrial revolution came to New Canada Township when the St. Paul and Duluth railroad was built from St. Paul to Duluth. In 1887 the first real estate developers, a firm called the Gladstone Land Company, arrived. They platted the Gladstone area not only for dwellings, but also for commercial and industrial uses. At that time, two railways ran through Gladstone: the Wisconsin Central and the St. Paul and Duluth, which built its shops there. The other industry was the St. Paul Agricultural Works (a plow factory). That was the year the township that was to be Maplewood got its distinctive shape. The part of McLeod Township lying north of St. Paul and south of New Canada was divided between the two communities, with the new boundary at Larpenteur Avenue. This left amile -wide strip of McLeod Township (McKnight to Century) which was incorporated into New Canada. Also, the residents of the northeast corner withdrew from 5 the township to organize into the village of North St. Paul. The first school was built in Maplewood in 1889 - -a two-story, four -room brick building costing $15,000. The first North St. Paul High School was built in 1902, four years later graduating a class of four. In 1948 the school district west of Arcade Street and south of State Highway 36 became a part of Consolidated School District 623 (Roseville). The rest of New Canada Township, North St. Paul and parts of Washington County formed Consolidated School District 622 in 1952. Change was in the air. Little Canada incorporated in 1953, leaving New Canada Township with 11,400 acres which by* now contained 14,200 people- -too many to attend annual town meetings. Rapid growth had already led to the appointment of a planning commission, adoption of a building code and the enlargement of the two - constable police force. This urbanization was creating pressing problems with sanitary sewer service. The township was seeking efforts to connect to the St. Paul sewer system to get relief from the sewer problems. In 1955, 3M Company built its Central Research Laboratory (the nucleus of its world- wide headquarters which now covers 420 acres and employs 12,000 people) on 150 acres along Highway 12, and a plan was afoot for St. Paul to annex this territory. As a result, in 1957 residents voted to incorporate all of the unincorporated land in the Township of New Canada into the village of Maplewood, spread out over 19 square miles to the north and east of the City of St. Paul. This action retained the 3M property as part of its tax base, the village was eligible for a share of the state gasoline tax, and the resident finally got their sewer services. Waldo Luebben, a resident since the early 1930s, and Chair of the Township Board, automatically became Maplewood's first mayor. The resident's reelected him for a full term in 1958. Gerald Berger, who became a member of the first elected council, first proposed the village name and insignia. Originally incorporated under Minnesota's Plan A form of government, with the council responsible for administrative as well as legislative functions, the present Plan B form of government, the council- manager system, was adopted by a referendum in 1968. rei GOALS OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD coals Maplewood has developed a set of community-wide goals. They are the basis for the City's planning and development efforts. These goals are: • Human Rights Goal: The City will positively identify itself as a community that includes and respects all individuals and groups within it, and will work to improve the human relations climate of the City. The City will work to secure for all citizens equal opportunity regardless of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, creed, marital status, disability, dependence on public assistance, age, or family status. The City will protect citizens' rights and encourage them to exercise their responsibilities as citizens. • Citizen Involvement Goal: The decisions and actions of City government should consider the needs and desires of its citizens. The City will provide a wide range of opportunities for citizen participation and community involvement in local decisions. • Communication Goal: The City will encourage and promote communication with the public to achieve a high level of citizen participation and community involvement. • City Implementation Goal: The City will use a rational and democratic system to help the City's citizens, council and management decide about the use of resources. These decisions should help the City achieve it's goals. In order to accomplish the goals listed above, the City has developed the following additional goals: • Cultural- Leisure Activity Goal: The City will encourage or provide opportunities for cultural and leisure activities for all citizens. • Economic Goal: The City will provide a supportive climate for business consistent with orderly development and planning. • Employee Goal: The City will provide and develop highly - motivated, professional, experienced, productive and well- trained employees with high morale and with a stake in the City's future. 7 • Finance Goal: The City will finance its activities in a manner which fosters the City's growth, improves the citizens' lives and assures the City's financial stability. • Health and Welfare Goal: The City will encourage the development and availability of activities that protect the health and welfare of its citizens. • Housing Goal: The City will encourage a variety of housing which provides for a choice of type, location, price and ownership versus renting. Housing should be safe, sanitary, secure, comfortable, free from blight, with access to public streets, utilities, schools and parks. • Metropolitan Goal: The City will actively participate in finding solutions to metropolitan problems which affect the City or its citizens. • Public Services and Infrastructure Goal: The City will provide and maintain comprehensive, high- quality and cost - effective public services. The City will provide these services in a fair and democratic way. • Safety and Social Order Goal: The City will provide an environment to enjoy life in peace and freedom from criminal acts and preventable disasters. • Significant Natural Features Goal: The City will preserve, conserve and use wisely its significant natural features. • Transportation Goal: The City will have a transportation system which is safe, efficient, minimizes disruption, promotes better land development, improves the aesthetic appearance of the City and reduces air pollution. This system should provide transportation opportunities for citizens without cars. • Urban Design Goal: The City will strive to improve the appearance of the City, maintain compatible land uses, and encourage a sensitive integration. among activities, man-made facilities and the natural environment. These are the City's overall goals. There are also specific goals and policies in each of the Comprehensive Plan elements. 7 NATURAL FEATURES INTRODUCTION Maplewood has many natural features, such as soils, slopes, wetlands, woodlots and large trees, which will restrict development design. The following maps and text describe these features and show where they are located. Soils and SIoces Figure 2 divides the City into three areas, based on the difficulty of building caused by soils and steep slopes: slight, moderate or severe. Areas with slight problems would generally be good for construction. Areas with moderate problems may require good management and careful design to overcome site limitations. Areas with severe problems may be impossible to develop without special design or significant costs. Trees Figure 3 shows the location of major tree cover. To preserve large trees, the City adopted a tree ordinance that the Builders' Association and environmental groups have endorsed. This ordinance requires that developers replace large trees they remove. The ordinance also allows the City to increase lot areas to save trees. The City also has a limited removal program for diseased trees on City land. Wetlands Figures 4 and 5 show the location of major wetlands and floodplains. The Ramsey County Soil Conservation Service has mapped and classified the City's wetlands. (Refer to their publication called "Wetland Areas of the City of Maplewood ".) VI Wetlands provide settling basins for excess runoff and are an excellent habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife. As a result, the County has purchased many of these areas for open space and the City has acquired many of these areas for storm water ponds. In some cases, the City has combined these ponds with City parks. The Corps of Engineers, the State Department of Natural Resources and the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed Board regulate many of the City's wetlands. The City also .regulates the filling of wetlands through its environmental protection ordinance. The City requires the preservation of wetlands that it needs for storm _water runoff or water quality preservation. The City shows the location and size of ponds it needs in the City's storm water management plan. . RoWplains Figure 5 shows the location of the floodplains. The City participates in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) flood protection program. FEMA last updated the City's floodplain information in 1986. The City has adopted a floodplain ordinance that regulates all construction in floodplains. The City also has a shoreland ordinance that restricts development around, its lakes and streams. The City's zoning map shows the areas that the ordinance restricts. These areas are generally within 1,000 feet of the lakes. This varies, however, with each lake. 10 W. bw 1A Left* [ILI 62 ( 30 7- 58 4V 11V 6 4 ) 7/r ST PAUL ST UL This map is for plannin purposes only and should not be used where Le Precise measurement is required. EASE OF CNEVIELOPMENT Sli Moderate Severe Soil Limitations Source: Ramse count sou Conservation Service Fi 2 I 77r �!�� .. _ � t a+tnaar a�w ��o t. NORTH ST. PAUL WWtTN St PAUL Ake2 *erMh;Aaj C.77a; r - a - -L. I P L E r I 1 1 I I 1 1 f `� i!,M i L� ,� J i _,�„ / � �."' , r• ,, --� - vas + - ; J 15 Jill W. bw 1A Left* [ILI 62 ( 30 7- 58 4V 11V 6 4 ) 7/r ST PAUL ST UL This map is for plannin purposes only and should not be used where Le Precise measurement is required. EASE OF CNEVIELOPMENT Sli Moderate Severe Soil Limitations Source: Ramse count sou Conservation Service Fi 2 I 77r �!�� .. _ � t a+tnaar a�w ��o t. NORTH ST. PAUL WWtTN St PAUL Ake2 *erMh;Aaj C.77a; r - a - -L. 1 c C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N r � f s 0 1600' 32W 4800' NORTH MAN 1 LIAR ° t ' I L W •� u N 0 < Tree Cover Fquro s This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used where precise measurement is required. �2p - h 3 I • i ��. � -C ceo ! � O ~ w r M a 3M i w r J J w � M O t I C O M P R E H E N S I V E P l A N a 0 1600' 3200' 4800' NORTH • soft" " ? v !1r f J 9L O- LITTLE t ` AO► . ST. ►AUL This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used where precise measurement is required. Wetlands Source: Ramsey County Soil Conservation Service Figure 4 .......... ""I" ft. PAUL •A Jil ri, � 1 it 1f A •w / »b• OEM 0 w a I • 1 11 ff nM mt j t r w _� It .►,:�,^ tit 1 • • f • Imp s C � u• w...rr• rw ► M � s A its s .ww a" t•r z r t i ON %OM ME104TS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN a 0 1600' 3200' 4800' NORTH ' ; ;. {� - - - --- - Avg t1 n L.A.. •. � r� 0 s .f.:.. �1 Lt ,I LITTLE CANADA rl 1 j O C Floodplain Source: U.S. Department of HUD Figure 5 oPL , Lj .7 r. rgVL This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used where precise measurement is required. _ O O _Z Z fA f 3 61 S. M r M M Y au _ � ANALYSIS OF POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT ANALYSES This section describes and analyzes the major demographic and employment trends which may influence City policy. Table 1 presents historical background and forecasts developed by the Metropolitan Council through the Year 2000, Notes From Table 1 • The City has been steadily growing over the years. • Since 1980, the percentage increase in Maplewood's population has reflected the rate of growth in the Metropolitan Area and has far outpaced other inner -ring suburbs. • The total number of households in Maplewood increased at a greater rate than in the Twin Cities or in other inner -ring suburbs. The Metropolitan Council expects this trend to continue through the next decade. • Household size has been on the decline for several years, but is larger in Maplewood than the metro area or the average inner -ring suburb. • The Metropolitan Council expects the rate of increase in employment in Maplewood to be strong into the next century. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 2 presents a summary of the major population characteristics of the City. This table compares .Maplewood to data from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area for 1980 and 1990. 15 TABLE 1 POPULATION, HOUSEHOLD AND EMPLOYMENT TRENDS Source: U.S. Census Bureau; Metropolitan Council 16 MA PLEWOOD INNER -RING SUBURBS METRO AREA # % CHANGE # % CHANGE # % CHARACTERISTICS YEAR FROM 1980 FROM 1980 CHANGE FROM 1980 Population 1960 18,519 1 1970 25 1 1980 26 505,847 1,985,873 1990 30 15 506,260 0.0 2 15 2000 32 19 510,390 0.8 2 16 Households 1960 4 552 1970 6,495 573 1980 8 185,585 721 1990 11 31 205 14 875,504 21 2000 12 42 212,020 10 931 29 Persons Per Household 1960 4.20 3.29 1970 3.77 3.19 1980 2.98 2.73 2.71 1990 2.62 2.47 2.56 2000 2.56 2.41 2.48 Employment 1960 2 607 1970 8 853 1980 20,000 312,870 1,069,030 1990 27 35 373 19 1 11 2000 29 45 395,050 26 1 31 Source: U.S. Census Bureau; Metropolitan Council 16 TABLE 2 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS 17 MAPLEWOOD MAPLEWOOD METRO AREA METRO AREA CHARACTERISTICS IN 1980 IN 1990 1980 1990 Number of Persons 26 30 1 2 Persons by Gender Female 51% 51% 51.5 51% Male 49% 49% 48.5% 49% Number of Families 6,977 8,446 438 583 Number of Households (occupied) 8 11 721, 444 875 Persons Per Household 2.72 2.62 2.75 2.56 Number of Housing Units 9, 042 12 750 922 Median Age 28.9 33.5 28.5 31.8 Number of Persons By Age 0-19 34% 27% 32% 28% 20-24 10% 7% 10% 8% 25-34 16% 19% 19% 20% 35-64 33% 35% 30% 34% 65-74 4% 7% 5% 6% 75+ 4% 5% 4% 4% Persons by Race White 95% 94% 95% 92% Non -White 5% 6% 5% 8% Households b„ ry Tyye Family Households Married Couples 67% 60% 58% 54% Female Householder 10% 11% 9% 10% Male Householder 2% 3% 2% 3% Non - Family Households 21% 26% 31% 33% Households with Persons Under Age 18 Married Couple Family 82% 77% 81% 77% Other Family Female Householder 15% 16% 15% 16% Male Householder 2% 3% 3% 3% Non - Family 1 % 4% 1 % 4% 17 TABLE 2 POPULATION CHARACTERLSTICS lu MAPLEWOOD MAPLEWOOD METRO AREA METRO AREA CHARACTERISTICS IN 1980 IN 1990 IN 1980 IN 1990 Related Children By Age Under 5 Years Old 24% 31% 31% 31% 5 to 17 Years Old 76% 69% - 69% 69% Family. Incomes Median $23 $24,794 Mean $25 $23 Employed Persons 16 and Over by Occupation Managerial and Professional 23% 26% Technical, Sales, Administration stration 35 % 35% Service 12% 13% Farming, Forestry, Fishing 1% 1 % Precision Production, Craft 12% 10% Operations, Fabrications, Laborers 17% 15% lu POPULATION IF FULLY DEVELOPED The City estimates that the population of Maplewood, if all residentially- planned areas are developed, will be about 40,891. This estimate is based on the number of undeveloped acres of land shown in Table 4 by residential category. The City assumed that the number of dwelling units per gross acres would be 2.3, 6 and 14.3 for low -, medium -, and high- density housing, respectively. The City based the 2.3 units per gross acre for low- density residential development on the typical new single- family subdivision in Maplewood. The City based the 6 and 14.3 units per gross acre for medium and high density residential development from the numbers in Table 5. The number of persons per housing unit was estimated at 2.9, 2.2 and 1.6 for those categories, respectively. The resulting additional future , population was calculated at about 9,937. The City determined the fully developed population by adding 9,937 to the 1990 population of 30,954. 19 LAND USE PLAN PURPOSE The Land Use Plan interrelates with all elements, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Land Use Plan is to designate the type, location and density of land uses in the City. In doing this, the City considered the following items: a. Community goals and objectives. b. Natural Features. C. Supportive elements, such as transportation, drainage systems and utilities. d. Existing and future problems. e. Coordination with surrounding communities and metropolitan facilities. The City government has a strong influence on the way a community develops. Community facilities and laws can stimulate or retard development. While the workings of the real estate market help determine the uses of land, these uses are regulated by City government. The City is the only entity with an opportunity to coordinate overall development in the City. The following are the City's overall land use goals: • Provide for orderly development. • Protect and strengthen neighborhoods. 20 • Promote economic development that will expand the property tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. • Preserve significant natural features where practical. • Minimize the land planned for streets. • Minimize conflicts between land uses. • Prevent premature use, overcrowding or overuse of land, especially when supportive services and facilities, such as utilities, drainage systems or streets, are not available. • Provide a wide variety of housing types. • Provide safe and attractive neighborhoods and commercial areas. • Integrate developments with open space areas, community facilities and significant natural features. • Maintain and upgrade environmental quality and, where needed, reclassify land uses. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following general development policies are intended to implement the previous goals: • The City will not approve new development without providing for adequate public facilities and services, such as streets, utilities, drainage, parks and open space. • Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties. • Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. • Whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. 21 • The City requires all development to meet state and federal laws, including Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regulations, unless the developer gets a variance from the regulating agency. • The City may require that a developer do sound tests to verify compliance with N[FCA regulations. • The City requires drainage and erosion control plans with new developments. Such plans shall not increase the rate of runoff and shall prevent erosion. � Grading and site plans should preserve as many significant natural features as practical. • The City will not remove land from the tax rolls unless it is in the public interest. • The City supports the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or incompatible development. • The City coordinates its planning with neighbo - ring communities. • The city applies its development policies and ordinances consistently and uniformly. � The City coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. • The City regulates development near or the alteration of natural drainage systems to manage storm water runoff. • The City uses the amsey County Soil Survey to identify areas with soils that are not suitable for building sites. • The City may require the developer tolurnish evidence from a registered soils engineer that areas with soil problems can be developed as proposed. • The City considers the recommendations of the four Watershed organizations in the review of development requests. 22 R-ES-IDENTLAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following are the City's residential development policies: • Plan residential neighborhoods, with schools and parks as the hub. Natural or man -made physical barriers should not traverse, but set the boundaries of the neighborhood. • Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single- family housing, public- assisted housing and low- and moderate- income housing, and rental and owner- occupied housing. • Disperse low- and moderate - income developments throughout the City, rather than concentrating them in one area or neighborhood. Such housing should be near to bus lines or have access to other public transportation. • Support innovative subdivision and housing design. • Protect neighborhoods from activities which produce excessive noise, dirt, odors or which generate heavy traffic. • Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. COARAERCLAL AND ]INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following are the City's commercial and industrial development policies: • Group compatible businesses in suitable areas. • Provide attractive surroundings in which to shop and work. • Require adequate off- street loading facilities. • Promote the joint use of parking areas, drives and trash containers. • Avoid disruption of adjacent residential areas. 23 • Use planned unit developments (PUDs) wherever practical. Maintain orderly transitions between commercial and residential areas. • Require commercial and industrial developers to make All necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. • Require) adequate screening or buffering of new or expanded commercial areas from any adjacent existing or planned residential development. • Restrict commercial development which will result in tic volumes which are beyond the capacity of the road systems or generate excessive noise or pollution as defined by state standards. • Plan land uses and streets to route nonresidential traffic around residential .neighborhoods. EXISTING LAND USE The City has a variety of land uses, ranging from a regional mall to parks and open space. Table 3 gives a breakdown by acreage and relative percentage of the basic land use classifications from 1975 - 19840 24 TABLE 3 LAND USE TRENDS, 1975 - 1984 % of % of % of 1975 Total 1980 Total 1984 Total Residential 3506 30 -- N N N (all types) Single Dwellings -- -- 3438 30 3503 30 Multiple Dwellings -- -- 181 2 213 2 .Public & Recreation 1646 14 -- N N N Public & Semi - Public -- -- 638 5 640 6 Recreation -- -- 1023 9 1023 9 Streets 298 3 298 3 317 3 Industrial 361 3 389 3 401 3 Commercial 425 4 459 4 530 5 Lakes 410 3 410 3 410 3 Undeveloped 4908 43 4718 41 4517 39 Source: Metropolitan Council Figure 6 is a map of the 1991. pattern of land use. Residential Land Use Most of the City's residential development is single dwellings. They make up 30 percent of the total land area. The rest of the residential land is a mixture of multiple dwellings and manufactured home parks. Most of the older homes are in the Gladstone Neighborhood. They are 1-1/2 story expansion homes built after World War H. The City has recently seen the construction of higher - valued homes in the lower leg and the area northwest of Kohlman Lake, The City has a variety of multiple dwellings, ranging from owner- occupied condominiums to rental apartments. In addition, there are five manufactured home parks. Commercial lznd- Use Maplewood has been one of the top cities in the metro area in retail building permit valuation over the last 10-15 years. The primary commercial center in the City is the Maplewood Mall area which is at White Bear Avenue and I -694. This mall provides regional, as well as 25 MA PI,EWOO D:. ,��v ..� ''� ,�� / � � 01'4 \O`er I� 11RU EMS Nam VAN W`%Wjb6..4cr. X. $ H W XV . NO,,, WINN vr"v &NL% d'. FAR em ���♦��\��� ��, ��t. -- 1� Z7 1 ap t W=z IN, k\L L N� RNN"MM, ZZ Elk o " NVE &I-M&XI R OAN -xx W. 9 I J, lti 0 ilolb W Lvw ur-Nbl I Y RESIDENTIAL sss MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE, RECREATIONAL, CEMETEF PURLIC—qFMI-Dilml If'% omimmif-r& 0 0, C it y of • - • • • c 1 0 Ar �� _ "r JAW* "m i . / R •a .. _ I Or 1 Men. 36 • ,�0� *� _ .-ten ►� !4 r r, Will fre cs t 4110ft saw don �'''' � ;'i tR 101401 t L% o AL ,a a LA Figure 7 IIA Y"M AYE. - -f "• -- ••�• tt� ST I LLWRTEN 0. r U DEV ELOPE D LAND. M1M11ENANA AYE. . 1 , _ _....... .. Planned Residential Uses MOT AYE. T.M. Nor _ ,,, • f)�•�I • UPKI AFTON ID. � 00 fs LOIAzN AF TON 0. NAILAW it. - �• 4 LIVA= AVE. fr ! NIGNWDW AVE. da ca ,,. • ,VMS Atli. C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N so 12/31/90 B . s W M 27 Figure 7 City • - • • s M to — W LOWIN LN. fo �• � man • c -- ■_ i� -'� c _ N LINK AVE. ---r�o • >r- � • © aIGNW= AVE. �II��� � «• a � am Java.- i <� FE � � . � . it ,+ � , •o ! to - r _ � 1 r sic ... C7[� dil . ,. , . 71 I lk did' WS R �r MRTUW AVE. STILLWAM 0. UNDEVELOPED LAND 1110RUM AVE. RA .. own '. • C In C 0 M P R E H E N S I V E PLAN W" AMN 10 14 M Lowlt AFTO AD. — w LOWIN LN. �• MAILAAD Ap. • ���� N N LINK AVE. ---r�o • >r- � aIGNW= AVE. «• a i •o ! to 12/31/90 W s Figure 8 community shopping. It has generated additional retail development around it. The City also has smaller shopping centers at Rice Street and Larpenteur Avenue, White Bear and Gervais Avenues, white Bear and Larpenteur Avenues, Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road, and Highway 36 and English Street. There are several other areas with separate commercial buildings. The area along Highway 61, north of Highway 36 to white Bear Lake, is known for its car dealerships. Industrial Iand Use The City does not have an industrial park. The largest industrial use is the 3M Company. Maplewood is the world headquarters for 3M. They use the Maplewood campus for corporate office, research and development buildings. There is additional light industrial and warehouse uses along Highway 36. Public and Semi -Public Use This classification includes municipal buildings, schools, churches, non - profit clubs and hospitals. Maplewood is home for St. John's Hospital Northeast, which has been steadily expanding for several years. Open Space and Recreational Uses The City has a variety of open space and recreational areas. This includes parks, wetlands and cemeteries. The parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the recreational uses in detail. The County has also purchased a significant amount of land for parks and along drainage areas for permanent open space. Undeveloped Land In spite of being afirst -ring suburb, the City has a surprising amount of undeveloped land left. About 24 percent of the City is still undeveloped. The City has planned most of the undeveloped land for residential use. Table 7 shows the acreage of land by neighborhood and by land use that is undeveloped. Figures 7 and 8 show where the undeveloped land is. LAND USE PLAN The City land use plan: • Incorporates the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan into a spatial arrangement of land use patterns. ` • Implements the neighborhood planning concept. • Considers the existing land use pattern, the topography and physical features of the community. • Coordinates and relates the City's major street plan with the land use plan. • Includes the community facilities necessary to serve the planned land uses. • Plans residential uses as the major land use within the City. • Provides enough area for commercial development to accommodate the population. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING CONCEPT The Plan identifies thirteen neighborhood planning areas. However, the City has planned each neighborhood to fit into the community -wide plan for the City. The City has planned its neighborhoods because of: • The need to recognize the physical impediments, such as freeways, lakes, railroads and political boundaries, which delineate areas of the City. • The need to strengthen citizen identity with their neighborhood. • The need to provide a focal point for bringing people together to discuss local problems of mutual concern and thereby develop stronger citizen involvement in community affairs. #'2006 30 TABLE 4 NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN LEGEND Residential Land Uses RE -40 Residential Estate (40,000 - square -foot lot areas) RE -30 Residential Estate (30,000- square -foot lot areas) RE -20 Residential Estate (20,000 - square -foot lot areas) R -1 Single Dwelling (10,000- square -foot lot areas) R -1 S Single Dwelling (7,500- square -foot lot areas) R -2 Single and Double Dwellings R -3L Multiple Dwellings (5.0 - 8.5 units /acre) R -3M Multiple Dwellings (5.5 - 9.5 units /acre) R -3H Multiple Dwellings (9.5 - 16.3 units /acre) Commercial Land Uses LBC Limited Business Commercial Center NC Neighborhood Commercial Center CO Commercial Office Center BC(M) Business Commercial (Modified) Center BC Business and Commercial Center Industrial Land Uses M -1 Light Manufacturing M -2 Heavy Manufacturing Community Service Land Uses OS Open Space P Parks S School C Church W Public Water Facility CEM Cemetery FS Fire Station G Government Facility L Library CH City Hall # 1 2006 31 In applying the neighborhood planning concept to the community, the City used the following guidelines: • Streets: The neighborhood planning areas, where possible, are bounded by major streets which move traffic around, instead of through the neighborhood. • Parks: Neighborhoods include parks that the City has designed to meet the needs of the particular neighborhood. • Schools: School sites have been combined with the neighborhood recreation area, whenever possible, to provide a focal point for the neighborhood. • Commercial: Commercial uses are generally at the edge of residential neighborhoods or at the intersection of arterial streets. LAND USE PLAN DEFINITIONS Most of the land use plan categories coordinate with the City's zoning categories. The uses permitted in these land use categories are the same as those in the corresponding zoning district. There is a list of categories in Table 4. The City and developers may also use planned unit developments (PUDs) when proposing or reviewing developments. The proposed land use(s) in a PUD must be consistent with the Land Use Plan. The City may require a PUD in areas of significant natural features, difficult topography or transition areas between largely different zoning districts. RESIDENTIAL LAND USES The Land Use Plan has ten residential classifications. The main difference between the single- dwelling classifications is the minimum lot sizes allowed. The difference between the three multiple- dwelling classifications is the maximum allowed density. Table 5 shows the maximum number of people per gross acre allowed. Gross acreage is the total area of the lot to be developed, including streets and drainage areas. Table 5 also shows the number of people per unit that the City uses in converting the people per gross acre to units per gross acre. If someone simply wants to know how many units of a certain type of dwelling they can build, they should use Table 5. # 1 2006 32 TABLE 5 - ESTIMATED PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT AND PLANNED MAXDIUM DENSITY OF DWELLING UNITS RL RM RH People/Gross Acre a roximate 11. 1 22.8 Type of Dwelling Single Dwelling Double Dwellings Townhomes Manufactured Homes Apartments (3 -4 units /bldg.) Apartments (5 -9 units /bldg.) Apartments (10 -19 units /bldg. ) Apartments (20 -49 units /bldg.) Apartments (50+ units /bldg.) Apartments (1- bedroom senior) Apartments (2- bedroom senior) Apartments (3- bedroom senior) People /Unit' Planned Maximum Density 6.3 (Units per gross acre) 2.9 4.1 4.6 2.2 5.4 6.0 2.2 5.4 6.0 2.0 6.0 6.7 2.4 5.0 5.5 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.1 2.0 2.5 5.4 6.0 6.3 7.0 7.4 8.3 8.5 9.5 (Based on bedroom mix.) (Based on bedroom mix.) (Based on bedroom mix.) N 10.4 10.4 11.4 9.5 10.4 12.0 14.3 16.3 Notes: (1) From the 1990 census. (2) The City shall determine the maximum allowed density by the minimum -lot areas in the zoning code. The City shall determine the maximum number of units from Table 5 if minimum -area lots for each unit are not platted. The City may allow reduced minimum -lot areas in planned unit developments (PUDs) where the overall PUD project does not exceed the maximum allowed density. (3) The City intends to review the density figures in Table 5 after each federal census. #12006 33 Low - density areas are usually for single dwellings. The City may allow an occasional double dwelling. Double dwellings, however, should be on high- volume streets at the periphery of single- dwelling neighborhoods. The Cit y may also allow multiple dwellings in low - density areas with a y P planned unit development if: 1. Clustering buildings would preserve significant natural features, such as woods, wetlands or steep slopes. 2. The buildings are of a scale, design and location that is compatible with adjacent development. Medium - density areas are for small -lot single dwellings, manufactured home arks and multiple dwellings. These areas usually abut single P P dwellings or are in neighborhoods where higher density would cause traffic or other P roblems for surrounding development or City facilities. High- density residential is for a variety of multiple dwellings where a higher density will not adversely affect surrounding development. CON04ERCIAL LAND USES There are five commercial land use classifications: • Limited Business Commercial (LBC). This classification includes offices, medical clinics, and child -care facilities. This classification .is intended for commercial areas adjacent to residential uses. • Neighborhood Commercial Center (NC). This classification is intended for businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. The City limits uses to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. • Commercial office (CO). The commercial office classification provides areas for offices and related uses together with supportive, low- intensity commercial uses. These areas should be close to residential areas so they can conveniently serve the public. These areas should be on heavily traveled streets or adjacent to commercial or industrial districts, to lessen their impact on residential areas. • Business Commercial (Modified). The City intends this classification as a transition between more intensive commercial uses and low -or medium- density residential areas. #2006 34 •Business and Commercial (BC). This commercial classification includes a wide variety, of commercial uses. The City may permit high - intensity uses, such as fast -food restaurants and gas stations, subject to specific performance guidelines. INDUSTRIAL, LAND USES There are two industrial land use classifications: Light Manufacturing (M-1),. This classification includes warehouses, wholesale businesses, offices, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations and other industrial uses of a lower - intensity nature. • Heavy Manufacturing (M -2). This classification includes higher intensity manufacturing and industrial uses. 3M has the only M -2 land in the City now. LAND USE ACTION PLAN Table 6 lists activities that the City should undertake to implement the Land Use Plan. This table also shows the responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for each activity. ,2006 35 TABLE 6 LAND USE ACTION PLAN Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Allow rezonings consistent PC, CC, Ongoing None Site Plan review; with the Land Use Plan Dir of CD street system Review commercial, industrial PC, CC, CDRB, ongoing None Land Use Plan; and multi - family site plans HRA, Dir of CD zoning ordinance Protect residential PC, CC, CDRB, ongoing TIF, GF, Land Use Plan; neighborhoods HRA, Dir of CD CDBG zoning ordinance ABBREVIATIONS: CDRB Community Design Review Board PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council HRA. = Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority Dir of CD = Director of Community Development TIF = Tax - increment financing GF = General Fund CDBG = Community Development Block Grant #f2006 36 TABLE 7 PLANNED LAND USE ACREAGE., 1991 NOTE: The figures in the left -hand column of each of the categories indicate the number of acres of land, expected in that category by neighborhood at time of full development. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of acres of undeveloped land in 1991. #loos 37 Low- Density Medium - Density High - Density Commercial Open Neighborhood Residential Residential Residential Industrial Space TOTAL RL RM RH 1. Western Hills 159 (0) 2 (0) 60 (0) 132 (42) 175 528 2. Parkside 585 (11) 44 (5) 47 (21) 30 (0) 235 941 3. Kohlman Lake 365 (168) 30 (11) 0 (0) 88 (60) 222 705 4. Hazelwood 469 (47) 40 (2) 34 (15) 750 (355) 300 1,593 S. Maplewood 242 (7) 100 (35) 4 (0) 54 (17) 100 500 Heights 6. Sherwood Glen 415 (5) 55 (21) 15 (3) 128 (160) 270 883 7. Gladstone 455 (7) 32 (22) 6 (0) 55 (8) 205 753 8. Hillside 349 (54) 193 (136) 7 (4) 95 (55) 470 1 9. Beaver Lake 394 (2) 258 (62) 30 (5) 637 (42) 230 1,549 10. Battle Creek 149 (0) 0 (0) 6 (0) 30 (0) 538 723 11. Vista Hills 244 (62) 104 (25) 2 (0) 7 (1) 182 539 12. Highwood 731 (241) 0 (0) 0 (0) 9 (0) 180 920 13. Carver Ridge 352 (90) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 89 441 4,909 (694) 858 (319) 211 (48) 2 (740) 3 11,189 NOTE: The figures in the left -hand column of each of the categories indicate the number of acres of land, expected in that category by neighborhood at time of full development. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of acres of undeveloped land in 1991. #loos 37 TABLE S FULLY DEVELOPED POPULATION BY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD 1990 POPULATION FULLY DEVELOPED POPULATION RL RM RH TOTAL 1. western Hills 1471 572 26 873 1471 2. Parkside 4409 3572 481 975 5028 3. Kohlman Lake 1226 2133 357 0 2490 4. Hazelwood 2612 2538 228 529 3295 5. Maplewood Heights 2421 1549 1300 80 2929 6. Sherwood Glen 3386 2721 712 334 3767 7. Gladstone 3250 3027 422 137 3586 8. Hillside 2688 2257 2517 160 4934 9. Beaver Lake 4698 2173 2958 515 5646 10. Battle Creek 1470 1270 0 200 1470 11. Vista Hills 2100 1143 1642 20 2845 12. Highwood 1099 2706 0 0 2706 13. Carver Ridge 124 724 0 0 724 TOTALS 30 26,385 10,643 3863 40,891 NOTE: The City estimated the fully developed population by adding the 1990 population to an estimate of additional population. The City estimated the additional population using the undeveloped residential acreages in Table 7 and the population densities on page 19. 0 #loos 38 s -"4 �.- �, � m% rm �l ... ffid - m ` " w R NON � � / � �_ � /_ � / r j � a �� a r � ® - - `I lip.. • , � � �� m il l ► � > � .■. � ..■ RANNING AREA NEIGH NUM N ' WESTERN HILLS f in 3 KOHLMAN LAKE Avg r • cK w1my M t■ • SHERWOOD GLA DSTONE 1 BATTLE CREEK 11 VISTA HILLS ZAM XN • •. I� ♦ ,. 13 CARVER RIDGE MIND A.3• 12 Neighborhood Planning Areas t� III IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH • C w if w ~ 39 � Fig 9 . 9 c 0 ly a L EC arnantpijr � Illector 1 • r �NS i1 1. IIV r Wil mm ■w Ml J ' 0. M■ MO � - VNNI ■■ 111M • �■ 111111111111111 : .. N�Ii11111,11�� „ •� El memo ll� Not -- I I I F I I A U-1 11�111111��111� ii 111111NInal i ■.OR■ ■■mmomm - ■ §111 /�■ ■�1;'. 111 � � , NO � 1 So • NO �� �� • i I O 1 .� �� �� �► •�L�ii� ear 1�� JJ Rrcmmnae Pa1�\ j I Fnajj ar ria j R -2(M) R -2(M " n -ONIeA -, oil f1 ■� r ■n���■ ��fflfl.�.: - -- s M E N, ► MISS Tip ► � i i���t 111! �� �' Nei RM 111 :1►�a��, 111110 RIM —:" �.I:► a e t i i t t t l l I l i t l l kb — i _t • t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 _ - 1 7 fi MEMO i LO MNI No Wil 111111111:0 oil SRI .I vu IRS!� owl Sir S Li ,� ► _'�� rim���� ra MIN A Us ■*.. it (, — 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 t l l l l l F ■ ... I a I . l i JOB ;I _ �� � ~ � . � X11 ,lam'= ; ; _ n�i�iai ��, • a1 L J �e / Lar periteur major - _ �► • —n o 0 1 h N�N I F= • eee�t i � /a■ 1 1 1! 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 t 1 1 1/ 1 1 .��� I I ! 1 ./; t t • I I: t 1 / t M—M J'a :111 ■r �` =• ■ms, was w .fit■■ � -�.. -.' -� ��tli • � _ �a maj or • _ o Ile •� lo p_ 0- 07Arw i KOHLMAN LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNNIG AREA MIN 1ME11 7 42 N N Fi 12 interchange an Vadnais Heights i i i minor arterial 0 r , Wit. ' - ..••�.,.. l 111 o/ ^ -� O � � Drinninol C z m W 4w m Q ♦„ — 0 Co V 0 Co 0 .-, 0 0 ,r E r 1 • ■ HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER t 43 interchange N Figure 13 HILLSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 8 4 N 47 Figure 17 �• i ■ &*W)PTH SAINT PAUL �'. ■ Cp North St. Paul Road R-30 . K W-W>.. t�-- fill m j or collector rte fill I '__ �: � � ►'i . p �� � �� .. mss; _ .,• � os .. r► w. �� ' i Larpenteur major arterial R-1n L R-3 ■ �■■�� .. • , M� os > REVISED j jJ Mc Kni HILLSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 8 4 N 47 Figure 17 BEAVER LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNNiG AREA NUMIDEII Q N 48 Fig ure 1 9 8 t -:- vf� o - 1. I OS • • - Iv Ave. �'■ • w �� ■ / rl • / . �. "`ale[ t • • • • • • O • ■ e ■ ■ • ar Ave. N Stillwater Rd. ■ i '' os eD _ `' 1 SW IMM) Lac Co �� �■ i �I!•e��� �� { � e - eei - -- . e f arvester Ave. � � 1 ,s - .. - ., 0 LB B N , „■ .. e _ fllfffAO.■�.s.�- - fer - � I - Av 1 , BC M-1 LBC ec. eee..• .ems . lie ■ ■tf•1 � • . A 11 V'J�' . .• • `• ��� ■�.� .eee� ■ maj . - nwa Ave. BC • M-2 3m CO I t erchange erchange •e BEAVER LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNNiG AREA NUMIDEII Q N 48 Fig ure 1 9 8 BATTLE CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING. AREA NUMBER 10 49 4 N Figure 19 • r � IN OW eall� nil. o_ 01 W ' ` %� �/■�t�11�i W16 "10 truce® ....■r■...�.1 eeeueeeuee�eeieU��� '`-aid _ • nit■ ®- .IJ• .o ..._' tutu °° �� -°� a� i■r � � :�. _ i� m - °m mm mm mm mm mm major collect ME= �= _ A s J z BATTLE CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING. AREA NUMBER 10 49 4 N Figure 19 VISTA HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PUNMNG AfM r Q N Figure 20 �°'�" ......�■ Aso = or AN r A ■ ■■r , . - J �. I l i ■ i MIN I ^ ■ ■ ' • MEN collect . �+ r • ••• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1�1 1 1 1 1! f i t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t I t i t t I t I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i ■ ■ii►�� OWN VISTA HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PUNMNG AfM r Q N Figure 20 �R I major collector . . • 1 1 1 1 1 / / / / I / 1 r � a / 1 1 1 I 1 . . . . . . . 1 Emma ' i �i_, . ON .. �� as ■ - �ffvwu - s • ME ■■ I� ■ . 4, • ••• 1 1 1 I 1 1 / '! F 1 / 1 / / I 1 I l 1 1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 ■ ..... -� 0 1 �► min c ollector R INS - r � r rw ION kv 1► J 1 • r r r r 51 Figure 21 REVISED ��.M a° AV it ti M TL AV xl I , I I �l 0 z!� R I .,Q Q os ,> cc L Carver Ave. I ' i or o �le t r Ll: r� ��■���s�� arm V � Q R-- 1 J L cc o s 0 1 0 I 2 � � P W major co lector NONNI ■■m■om■■ I j i I 73 0 01 0 v o 0 E I 0� c R- al Newport CARVER RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 13 52 Q N Figure 22 HOUSING PLAN PURPOSE The intent of the Housing Plan is: • Describe the current housing stock. • Quantify the number of housing units by type. • Describe the services and amenities which affect the quality and desirability of neighborhoods. • Set goals for affordable housing and a mix of housing types to meet the life -cycle housing needs of Maplewood residents. • Identify strategies for achieving those goals. HOUSING STOCK The overall condition of the City's housing units is good, although there are small areas that have houses with the potential to deteriorate. To prevent this, the City adopted a housing maintenance code which enables officials to require owners to maintain and make basic repairs to their structures. The City has also adopted a "Truth -in- Housing" ordinance. The City designed this ordinance to help buyers make an informed decision. Construction During the 1980s A total of 2,894 housing units were built during the 1980s in Maplewood. Slightly more than 50 percent of these were town house, duplex and other multi- family units. There are a total of 12,120 housing units in the City (1990 Census), with single - family detached units representing about 63 percent (7636 units) of the housing stock. (See Table 9.) 1988 data from the Metropolitan Council reveals that 21 percent of Maplewood's housing stock was built between 1980 and 1988. Although this figure is comparable to the Metropolitan Area average, it is more than twice the rate for other inner -ring suburbs. 53 TABLE 9 HOUSING CHARACTEIMTICS CHARACTERISTIC 1980 MAPLEWOOD 1990 MAPLEWOOD 1980 METRO AREA 1990 METRO AREA Total Number of Housing Units 9 12 120 796 508 922 224 Units by Type of Occupancy - Owner- Occupied 74% 72% 64% 64% Renter- Occupied 23% 23% 32% 31% Vacant 3% 5% 4% 5% Households by Type of Occupancy - Owner- Occupied 74% 69% 66% 68% Renter- Occupied 26% 31% 34% 32% Median Value of Owner- Oc Units $64,600 $87,800 $64,100 Median Rent $268 $473 $255 $450 Persons in Units Lacking Complete 0.37% 0.77% Plumbing . Number of Vacant, Boarded Units 0.03% 0.10% 0.01% 0,10% (3 units) (13 units) 54 TABLE 9 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS (Continued) Source: U.S. Census Bureau Metropolitan Council Apartment Profiles, Median Rent, 3190 55 INNER -RING METRO CHARACTERISTIC MAPLEWOOD SUBURBS AREA Rental Units Vacant for 6 Months or More (1980) 0.26% 0.26% Year Housing Units Built, 1989 Pre - 1940 6% 8% 22% 1940-1959 28% 37 % 22% 1960-1979 45% 45% 39% 1980 1989 21% 11% 17% Housing Units by Type, 12 -31 -88 Single- Family 63% 64% 61% Multi- Family 25% 31% 34% Townhouse 6% 3% 4% Manufactured 6% 2% 2% Housing Source: U.S. Census Bureau Metropolitan Council Apartment Profiles, Median Rent, 3190 55 While the number of manufactured homes in Maplewood declined in the late 1970s, this trend reversed in the 1980s with the addition of 375 new units. The City now has five manufactured home parks containing 751 units, which represents 6 percent of the City's housing stock. This rate is three times higher than that found in other inner -rin g suburbs or in the Metro Area. Owner - Occupied Versus Renter-OccupjgJ'Housin Units Maplewood has a higher than average percentage of owner - occupied housing units than in the Metro Area or in other first -ring suburbs. In 1980, 74 percent of the units were owner - occupied; down from 79 percent in 1970. The 1990 Census showed a decrease to 72 percent from the 74 percent in 1980 in the percentage of home ownership. Housing Affordability The price and rent of Maplewood housing is only slightly above the metropolitan mean and median. There is also a diversity of styles and price ranges. Older homes on smaller lots provide opportunities for first- time buyers in the Western Hills, Parkside and Gladstone neighborhoods. Opportunities for low - and moderate- income households are available in manufactured home parks and in a variety Y of types and locations of multiple dwellings. The move -up housing market is particularly strong with such choices available throughout the City. Buyers can find more expensive housing in the Vista Hills, Highwood and Kohlman Lake neighborhoods. Housing Assistance Maplewood participates in several programs that assist households in the Cit The Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority manages p Y g the Rehabilitation Loan Program, the Section 8 and Section 236 Rental Assistance Programs, In 1990, the Section 8 Rent Assistance Program helped 180 households (36 senior and 144 family), which represents a small portion of the low - income households living in Maplewood. This program does not come close to meeting the need for affordable housing in Maplewood or elsewhere. This is because the Federal Government has reduced levels of funding annually throughout the 1980s. Moreover, the 1990s may also witness the expiration of many long -term Federal contracts with landlords for the set -aside of units used in this program. 6TID-Ij In addition to the individual system of vouchers, there are four complexes providing subsidized housing for families and the elderly: Archer Heights, 1816 Beebe Road; Maplewood Gardens., 410 South McKnight Road; Maple Knolls, 1880 Mesabi Road (south of Radatz between white Bear and Southlawn); and Concordia Arms, 2030 Lydia. Information on the current number and .type of subsidized housing units is shown on the accompanying Tables 10 and 11. Maplewood participates in four loan programs funded by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and managed by local lenders. These include the Home Improvement Loan Program, the Home Energy Loan Program, the MHFA Single - Family Mortgage Loan Program, and the Horne Ownership Assistance Fund. Maplewood has also provided money to the Share -a -Home program managed by the Lutheran Social Services Administration. This program matches individuals looking for an inexpensive place to live with elderly homeowners who need help to remain in their homes. Development Ordinances The Maplewood Zoning Ordinance includes seven districts which permit single- family detached housing. The minimum lot areas range from 7,500 to 40,000 square feet. The R -2 district also allows two - family dwellings, and the R -3 district permits multi- family developments ranging upwards from four units per acre. In recent years, the City has adopted many ordinances which effect development and housing. These include a Shoreland Overlay District to protect shoreland areas, an Environmental Protection Ordinance to protect areas of significant natural features, a pipeline setback ordinance to protect buildings from pipeline leaks, and a housing maintenance code. The City has also adopted a "truth -in- housing" ordinance. The City designed this ordinance to help purchasers make an informed decision and may also promote privately negotiated housing repairs at the time of sale. The City requires sellers to have an inspection done which discloses information about the property, and highlight any potential repair needs or housing code deficiencies. 57 TABLE 10 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNITS 1990 Source: "Changes in the Subsidized Housing Market in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 1980- 1989," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council TABLE 11 SECTION 8 AND SECTION 236 UNITS Archer Privately Certificates Concordia TYye of Unit Heights Gardens _ Community Public Housing: Owned Housing -: and Vouchers Total Subsidized Units: Family Units Mixed Elderly Total Mixed Elderly Total Mixed Elderly Total Mixed Elderly Total 3 -- 71 Two Bedroom 47 13 32 -- 92 Maplewood 6 207 193 400 144 36 180 351 229 580 Ramsey County 1 2 4,224 3,345 2 5 2 982 3 7,346 6 13 Metro Area 3 8 12 10 9 20 8 3,154 11 22 21 44 Source: "Changes in the Subsidized Housing Market in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 1980- 1989," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council TABLE 11 SECTION 8 AND SECTION 236 UNITS Elderly Units One Bedroom 69 -- 124 193 Source: City of Maplewood, 1990 Archer Maplewood Maple Concordia TYye of Unit Heights Gardens _ Knolls Arms Totals _ Family Units One Bedroom 68 -- 3 -- 71 Two Bedroom 47 13 32 -- 92 Three Bedroom 6 16 20 -- 42 Handicapped -- _ -- 2 -- _ _ 2 121 29 57 -- 207 Elderly Units One Bedroom 69 -- 124 193 Source: City of Maplewood, 1990 New Housing The addition of nearly 2,904 housing units from 1980 through 1989 increased the supply of housing by 30 percent. Still, nearly 22 percent of the land planned for residential use remains undeveloped, providing areas for continuing new construction in the coming years. Much of this land is in the City's southern "leg." The undeveloped land is the reason the Metropolitan Council projects a population increase of 19 percent between 1980 and 2000. This compares with a 0.8 percent growth rate for all inner- ring suburbs. As development continues, though, the available land will be increasingly difficult to develop because of environmental constraints, such as steep slopes, poor soils, or wetlands. The challenge for the City will be to continue to allow for the development of a range of housing options for its citizens on the undeveloped sites. wed Housing Market Trends In recent years, the Metropolitan Council has produced several studies examining potential changes in the region's demographics and what these changes might mean for the housing market. This research suggests that major changes in the composition of the population will affect the nation and the state over the next ten to thirty years. These changes will also affect the Twin Cities and Maplewood. The large group of baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1965, sharply boosted housing production during the 1970s and 1980s as they formed new households. A generation has followed the baby boomers that is smaller in numbers. As these two groups move through their life cycles, they will change the housing market: • There may be less demand for rental housing as the typical renter age group moves into owner- occupied structures. On the other hand, the elderly may be looking to move from owner - occupied units to rental units. This may off -set the decline in nonelderly rentals. • There may be less demand for new housing by the late 1990s because there will be fewer new households. As a result, it may become more difficult to sell entry-level housing. 59 • Household composition may shift. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that, between 1985 and 2000, 69 percent of the growth in new households will be in nontraditional households. Almost 14 percent will be in female, single - parent families whose median income is less than half the regional median. Of these, more than 30 percent will be living in poverty. This may not only affect the housing market, but may also place a greater strain on the public to provide more affordable housing options. • There may be less subsidized housing. The changing household structure is occurring when the future of much of the region's subsidized housing is unclear. During the 1990s, more than 5,000 contracts for subsidized units between the federal government and- investment housing owners will expire. It is unknown whether or not the Federal government will replace these contracts. • Rehabilitation needs may increase. The Metropolitan Council estimates that by 2000, 30 percent of Maplewood housing stock will be more than 40 years old and 6 percent will be more than 60 years old. This trend, coupled with lower revenues from higher vacancy rates, may make rental property more difficult to maintain. However, reduced demand may give consumers more leverage, requiring landlords to provide a more competitive product. • The need for elderly housing is increasing and may increase sharply as the baby boomers begin to reach their 60s, starting after 2006 and peaking after 2025. Between 1990 and 2000, the regional population will have grown by five percent and the baby boomers will be between ages 35 and 64. Additionally, the percentage of young adults in the region will decrease by 2000. Maplewood and the developing suburbs will continue to grow, although slower than the previous decade. This is because the number of annual housing starts will be about half what it was in the 1980s, By 2010, the baby boomers will be between the ages of 45 and 64 and their children will be entering the housing market. Growth in Maplewood and the developing suburbs may continue to slow and some may experience problems similar to those now faced by the central cities. It may become more difficult to sell a home, and buyers may have many more affordable choices. Baby boomers may force the housing market to produce more and better housing for this group. .t Further details on the future of the Twin Cities housing market are available in "Looking Ahead at Housing...The Effect of Changing Demographics on the Twin Cities Area Housing Market," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, 1988, HOUSING ISSUES The following are City housing issues: • What steps should the City and its Housing and Redevelopment Authority take to increase the amount of affordable housing? • Is the City planning enough land for alternative housing types? If not, what changes should the City make? • What steps can the City take to prevent the deterioration or abandonment of its older housing stock? • What steps can the City take to prevent neighborhoods from deteriorating? • What strategies can the City develop to assure that developers build a variety of housing styles and types in both new developments and infill development projects? • Are there adequate public services and facilities within each neighborhood to meet the needs of existing and planned populations? • How can the City preserve some of its natural features and beauty as the community grows? • Will future housing meet the needs of the increasing number of nontraditional households, particularly single- parent families? 61 HOUSING GOALS AND POLICIES Housing Affordability Housing costs continue to rise throughout the region as a result of a variety of reasons. These include increasing land and construction costs, utilities and taxes; declines in government aid programs; and, indirectly, land use regulations. These cost increases have the greatest effect on low - and moderate- income households. Changes in mortgage interest rates also affect the affordability of housing. The Metropolitan Council has a regional goal that 63 percent of the housing in each community should be low -to- modest cost units. Metropolitan Council figures show that Maplewood came very close to meeting this goal in 1980, with 59 percent of its housing classified as low - to- modest cost. The 1990 Census shows that Maplewood exactly met the goal of having 63 percent of its housing (7684 units) of low -to- modest cost. The City will continue to try to meet this goal with the following policies: Financing • The City, through its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will explore all avenues for financing affordable housing, including. - Use of tax- exempt and tax - increment financing. - Programs, including grants, loans and federal tax credits, available through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. - Programs available through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. - Programs available through the Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority. - Community Development Block Grants and other programs through fey County. Rental Assistance • The City, through the HRA, will continue to participate in rental assistance programs, including those available through the Metropolitan E[RA and the federal government. M e Energy Efficiency • The City will promote energy efficient improvements in all types of housing units to help keep them affordable. The City will provide information and, when available, financial help for both owner- occupied and rental units. HOUSING DIVERSTI'Y Most of Maplewood's housing is single - family homes. The Metropolitan Council has a goal calling for each community to provide 41 percent of its housing stock in housing types other than single- family homes. From 1980 to 1988, housing in Maplewood, other than single-family homes, increased from 31.5 percent of the housing stock to 37.0 percent. The City will continue to work toward this goal with the following general policy: Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the City. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. The City also adopts the following specific housing diversity policies: Land Use Plan • The City will continue to diversity of housing styles, land use plan. provide dispersed locations for a types and price ranges through its Ordinance Provisions • The City will regularly review and, as necessary, change its zoning and subdivision regulations to assure that they are flexible enough to allow a variety of housing options. Housing for the Elderly and Disabled • The City will make efforts to plan and provide for the housing and service needs of the elderly and .disabled. Nontraditional Households • The City will encourage development of housing and services which meet the needs of nontraditional households. rvj NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY It is important to assure that the efforts to provide life -cycle housing needs of the City are accomplished in a manner which is compatible with the character of existing neighborhoods and respect the environment. It is also important to prevent housing in older neighborhoods from deteriorating. Much of this housing was built before Maplewood became a village, when building codes were not in place. There are also deteriorating housing units scattered throughout the City. In the future, these units may become less attractive to home buyers, thereby depreciating housing values. Figure 23 (page 66) identifies the areas in Maplewood of most concern. To address these concerns, the City adopts the following policies: 1. Plan and design new housing to: • Protect existing housing, natural features, and neighborhood identity and quality. • Assure there are adequate utilities, community facilities and convenient shopping. 2. Maintain or strengthen the character of established neighborhoods and assure that all housing units are safe, sanitary, secure and free from blight. The City also adopts the following neighborhood quality policies: Ordinance Provisions • The City will work to protect the integrity and long -term viability of residential neighborhoods and reduce potential negative effects of commercial or industrial land uses through zoning, site plan review and code enforcement. • The City will require and enforce high design and maintenance standards for multi - family residential development. Design standards will include provisions about building massing, architectural design, off- street parking ratios and location, access, traffic impacts, landscaping, fencing or screening, and trash handling. 64 LDcatio Aspects • The City will allow affordable housing in any location suitable for residential uses. Environmental Considerations • The City will assure that new development respects the natural environment to the um extent P ractical. • The .City will continue to use its Shoreland, Floodplam* and Environmental Protection Ordinances to assure P rotection of lakes, streams, ponds, wetlands, steep slopes and woodlots. Housing Maintenance Code • The City will continue to encourage the maintenance of its housing through its housing maintenance codes. The City's truth -in- housing program should also encourage housing maintenance. Maintenance Assistance • The City, through its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will participate in programs to help property rt owners with home maintenance and improvements through loans and, if available, grants. HOUSING ACTION PLAN • Table 12 on page 67 lists activities that the City should undertake to carry out the Housing Plan. 65 I —i!4 BEAK UVl. --- a CO. JtD. C `, j POTENTIAL DETERIORATION Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration COiPAEHENSIVE PLAN 0 ow 1720 3440 $40 FT. 66 K sc w to m E M 3MARYLAND AVE. 4 El..E. l •.E STILLWATER RD. MINNEHAHA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.H. 12/1 -94 UPPER AFTON RD. _ LOWER AFTON RD. LONDIN LN. MAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. HIGHWOOD AVE. CARvam mr. i ' 1 5 _ M K W ¢ N x Figure 23 ii.. I o =q iull V `, j POTENTIAL DETERIORATION Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration COiPAEHENSIVE PLAN 0 ow 1720 3440 $40 FT. 66 K sc w to m E M 3MARYLAND AVE. 4 El..E. l •.E STILLWATER RD. MINNEHAHA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.H. 12/1 -94 UPPER AFTON RD. _ LOWER AFTON RD. LONDIN LN. MAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. HIGHWOOD AVE. CARvam mr. i ' 1 5 _ M K W ¢ N x Figure 23 TABLE 12 HOUSING ACTION PLAN Action Resvonsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Explore all options for HRA, Dir of CD ongoing CDBG, TIF, Land Use Plan, financing affordable EFB, MHFA, Metro HRA housing other, local, state, and federal programs Continue to provide rent HRA, Dir of CD, Ongoing Section 8 Metro HRA assistance to needy CC Program, other households state and federal programs Provide information and HRA, Dir of CD Ongoing State and federal Metro HRA assistance to encourage programs energy efficiency improvements Provide dispersed locations for variety of housing types, styles, prices Review and update Codes that affect housing Provide for the housing and service needs of the elderly and disabled Provide housing and services to meet the needs of nontraditional households Protect integrity of, and prevent deterioration in, existing neighborhoods Encourage high design and maintenance standards for multi- family housing PC, CC ongoing None Land Use Plan PC, CC, HRA Ongoing None Land Use Plan Dir of CD HRA, PC, CC Ongoing State and federal Metro HRA, programs Land Use Plan HRA, CC Ongoing State and federal programs PC, Dir of CD, HRA Ongoing None Land Use Plan PC, CC, Dir of CD, Ongoing None Land Use Plan CDRB 67 TABLE 12 HOUSING ACTION PLAN (Continued) Action Resyonsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Assure that new PC, CC, ongoing None Land Use Plan, development is compatible Dir of CD RW, SC, DNR, CE with, and sensitive to, the environment Continue to review and HRA, Dir of CD enforce housing maintenance code Ongoing GF Participate in rehabilitation, HRA, Dir of CD and grant programs Develop programs to HRA, CC help first -time home buyers Ongoing CDBG, State of Metro HRA, Minnesota Ramsey County Ongoing GF MWA, NIlo BRA ABBREVIATIONS: HRA = Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council Dir of CD = Director of Community Development CDBG = Community Development Block Grant Funds (federal) TIF = Tax increment financing EBF = Essential bond financing GF = General fund MHFA = Minnesota Housing Finance Agency METRO HRA = Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority RW Ramsey Washington Watershed District SC = Soil Conservation District DNR = Minnesota Department of Natural Resources CE = Army Corps of Engineers CDRB =- Community Design Review Board m PARKS PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of the Parks Plan is: • To reconcile park needs with forecasted population increases and development. • To evaluate the park and recreational needs of Maplewood's residents and to develop standards for measuring the meeting of those needs. • To identify needs for inclusion in the Capital Improvements Plan. • To identify long -term park goals. GOALS The parks goals are based upon the following analysis of conditions. • Provide adequate parkland within each neighborhood to meet the needs of local residents, to help give neighborhoods a sense of community, to serve as a catalyst for development, to provide facilities and opportunities residents cannot normally provide for themselves and to contribute to the health and well being of Maplewood's citizens. • Provide programs and facilities which meet the recreation needs of all age groups, socioeconomic classes and those with special living needs. M e OBJECTIVES The following objectives will provide the framework for development of the Plan recommendations and for future P lanning and development of the Maplewood Parks and Recreation Program: • Residents should not have to cross major or principal arterials or other P h Y sisal barriers to gain access to the neighborhood parks designated to serve them. • All residents, where possible, should be served by a neighborhood park. • Maplewood will only provide mini -parks in areas which the City cannot adequately serve a neighborhood park. • Maplewood will continue to promote intergovernmental cooperation with local units of government and private organizations to assure a wide range of recreation opportunities for its citizens. • Maplewood will monitor changes in demographics and lifestyle needs and strive to provide programs and ' facilities to meet these needs. CLASSIFICATIONS AND DEFR4M.ONS The Parks Plan uses the following park facilities classifications and definitions. They are adapted from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council's Recreation Open Space Development Guide /Policy Plan and the National Recreation and Park Association Standards. 70 CLASSIFICATION DEFINITION Mini -park Specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or specific group such as tots or senior citizens. Neighborhood Park Community Playfield Area combining recreational activities, such as field games, count games, crafts, apparatus area, skating and neighborhood centers, with more passive recreation activities, such as walking, viewing, sitting and picnicking. Area for intense recreational facilities, such as athletic fields and swimming pools, could include neighborhood use. Special Feature Area that preserves, maintains and provides specialized or single - purpose recreational activities, such as a golf course, nature center, display garden, arena, downhill ski area or sites of historic or archaeological significance. EXISTING FACHITIES AND PROGRAMS Current Inventory The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department maintains 33 parks. There are seven mini - parks, seventeen neighborhood parks, six community playfield /neighborhood parks, one community playfield and two special feature facilities. These facilities are described in Table 13 and on Figure 24, Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities. Several of these City Parks are leased from Ramsey County. County officials have shown a willingness to transfer ownership of these non- regional facilities. 71 e � `1 1 6 ire Existin g Parks and NIGWAOD AVE' Recreational Facilities M A P L E W O 0 D C O M P R E H ENS I V E P L A N 0 660 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 72 270 �1 ki L OAF 42 i ~ t- � •= � s W N Figure 24 ,, ; • •• � a a q h < / IU at .. H W IIARYLAND AVE. • NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 0 OTHER PARKS AND 34C 1. WESTERN FILLS RECREATIONAL FACILITIES 1 3. EDGERTON S. EDGERTON ELEMENTARY 7. MAPLECREST SCHOOL 8. KOHLMAN 9. PHALEN- KELLER- SPOON 12. GLOSTER REGIONAL PARK STILLWATER RD. 14. GLADSTONE 15. WEAVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.' 16. ROBINHOOD 17. GLADSTONE COMMUNITY EOU- 18. HARVEST CATION CENTER •.. .. 19. NORTH HAZELWOOD 22. JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL NINNENANA AVE.._ 20. POUR SEASONS 24. HARMONY COMMUNITY EDUCA- . 21. SHERWOOD TION CENTER 23. WAKEFIELD 27. JOY COUNTY PARK 25. MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 28. ALDRICH ARENA 26. PLAYCREST 29. GOODRICH GOLF COURSE CONWAY AVE. 30. GOODRICH 31. MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 32. HILLSIDE 34. BEAVER LAKE COUNTY PARK 35. GERANIUM 36. BEAVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 3.7. GETHSEMANE SCHOOL 41. BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL T.N. 12/ 39. LIONS PARK 40. AFTON HEIGHTS 42. CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL •�' 45. VISTA HILLS • ••, 46. PLEASANTVIEW �_.. 47 FISH CREEK WILLARD MUNGER TRAIL UPPER AFTON RD. ' NEIGHBORHOOD PARK ' OTHER CITY PARKS SERVICE AREA 2. ROSELAWN POND 4. HERITAGE CENTER 6. KENWOOD LOWER AFTON R0. - 10. TIMBER LONDIN LN. 11. FLICEK 13. LOOKOUT NA I LAND - 33.NEBRASKA Ep • 38. MAPLEWOOD NATURE CENTER 43. CRESTVIEW 44. MAILAND '•,•� LINYOOD AVE. Existin g Parks and NIGWAOD AVE' Recreational Facilities M A P L E W O 0 D C O M P R E H ENS I V E P L A N 0 660 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 72 270 �1 ki L OAF 42 i ~ t- � •= � s W N Figure 24 Other Facilities In addition to those facilities maintained by Maplewood, Ramsey County and the two independent school districts serving Maplewood, Roseville (ISD 623) and North St. Paul - Maplewood /Oakdale (ISD 622), also maintain arks and recreation facilities. There are two regional parks in P the City - Battle Creek Regional Park and Phalen- Keller- Spoon Regional Park. They are part of the regional recreation open space system. These facilities, included in Figure 24, are an important component in the provision of recreational facilities for Maplewood residents. Open Space There are many creeks, marshlands and other areas in Maplewood owned b y y � Pe Rams Cou for o p e n space. These lands have not been included in the inventory of Maplewood's recreation facilities, as they do not fit the current classifications of Maplewood Parks. Cultural and Leisure ProgeTr 0 n The City offers a variety of cultural and leisure programs, including: art and dance courses, senior citizens programs, classes for disabled citizens, after - school recreation programs, a range of organized sports programs for all ages, crafts, summer playgrounds, skating, tours, special events, playgrounds in the street, mobile puppet wagon and many others. ordination With Other Agencies and Or zations Maplewood works with the local schools to provide additional The City has also developed partnerships with neighbori programming. ng communities to jointly offer programs which entail specialized facilities not available in each community. The City maintains a close working relationship with Ramsey County and cooperates with a diverse range of organizations, including Babe Ruth Baseball, commercial organizations, and service groups to assure a wide variety of programs and activities. 75 PARK FACILXrIES STAIDARDS The City is using the following standards to assess the degree to which Maplewood's park facilities meet the present and future needs of the community. These. standards were taken from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council's Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan and the National Recreation and Park Association Standards. TABLE 14 PARKS FACILITIES STANDARDS Acres/ Population Size Service Classification 1000 People Served Ran -e Area (radius) Mini -Park Neighborhood Park Community Playfield Special Features 0.5 500-29500 2,500 sq. ft. N/A to 1 acre 2.5 21000 - 109000 1.5 10,000 - 25,000 N/A Community Notes About the Use of Standards 5 - 25 ac. 1/4 - 1/2 mi. 25 - 50 ac. Community Specific to N/A Feature National and regional standards for parkland provide general indications of parkland deficiencies. Meeting these standards, however, does not necessanly guarantee that existing parks meet a city's needs in all respects: • A city must consider its geography and topography. This is a particular concern in Maplewood because of its physical layout. Physical barriers, such as highways and waterbodies which separate neighborhoods, may result in the need for more parkland. • The intended use and function of each type of park may vary and mean that more or less land should be devoted to various types of parks. TV • The minimum amount of. parkland identified in the standards outlined on the previous page includes only enough developable land to provide those recreational facilities normally found in such parks. Thus, these standards do not include parkland which is occupied by water, marsh, woods or steep slopes; even though these areas do add to the character of a park and to a feeling of open space. APPLICATION OF STANDARDS IN MAPLEWOOD Mini -Parks Maplewood maintains seven mini -parks totaling 11.7 acres. Neighborhood Parks Maplewood has seventeen neighborhood parks totaling 160 acres. However, five of these facilities are below the recommended five -acre minimum size. There are also six parks which serve a dual purpose as both a neighborhood park and a community playfield. One of the neighborhood parks remains undeveloped. Many of the existing neighborhood parks are underdeveloped. The current capital improvements plan addresses the needs in some of these parks. Service -Area Standard Those parks which serve as community playfields and neighborhood parks were included in calculating the service -area standards for neighborhood parks. Thus, a total of 23 parks were. classified as neighborhood parks for this analysis. Application of the service -area standard of a half -mile service radius revealed neighborhood parkland deficiencies in portions of several neighborhoods, -including- portions of the Kohlman Lake, Sherwood Glen, Hillside and Highwood neighborhoods. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 15 and in Figure 25. Although the number and location of neighborhood parks are adequate in the Parkside, Hazelwood, Gladstone, Beaver Lake, Vista Hills and Carver Ridge, as well as portions of the Sherwood, Hillside and Highwood neighborhoods, many of those parks are undeveloped, underdeveloped and/or undersized. 77 Population -Based Standard In applying the population -based standard, only the seventeen neighborhood parks were included. The six mixed-use facilities were not included in applying these standards. The results of this analysis are illustrated in Table 16. Community Plafields Flicek Park is the City's only community playfield. Six other parks serve a dual role, functioning as community playfields and neighborhood parks. These seven parks have a combined total of 120.5 acres. Service -Area Standard Because of the unique shape of Maplewood, the City has developed community playfields to minimize traveling distances for teams in an organized sport. The growth of organized sports programs requires all available facilities to be scheduled as needed. As such, the City does not consider it appropriate to apply aservice-area standard for community playfields. Population -Based Standard Although all but one of the community playfields serves a dual purpose, the entire acreage for each of the seven facilities was used in applying the population -based standard. The results of this analysis are illustrated in Table 16. Special Features Service -area and population -based park standards are not applicable to the City's two special feature facilities. The Heritage Center facility is on a 3.5 -acre site next to Edgerton park. The building is available on a limited basis for. a variety of programs and special events. The Maplewood Nature Center, a 40 -acre wooded tract and wetland, is an interpretive center staffed with naturalists. The Center contains many trails and provides opportunities for nature study. TABLE 15 APPLICATION OF SERVICE -AREA PARK STANDARDS TABLE 16 APPLICATION OF POPULATION -BASED PARK STANDARDS Current - -Recommended Recommended RemmmaxW Standard Number Service Number Size Total Current Current of Radius of Range Park Park Acreage Parks (Miles) Parks (Acres) Acreage Mini -Park Mini -Park 11.7 7 N/A N/A 0.06-1.0 N/A Neighborhood Park Park (including multi -use 2.5 31,000 77.5 40,982 104.5 Community facilities) 277.5 23 0.5 27 5-25 135-675 Community Playfield 3.0 1 N/A N/A 25-50 NIA Special Feature , 43.5 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 335.7 .33 TABLE 16 APPLICATION OF POPULATION -BASED PARK STANDARDS (1) Includes 6 mixed-use facilities. 79 Recommended Recommended Standard Estimated Total Forecasted Total Current (Acres/ 1990 Park Ultimate Park Park MMe AcreaLe 1000 Pop.) Population Acreage Poyulation Acreage Mini -Park 11.7 0.5 319000 15.5 401,982 20.9 Neighborhood Park 172.0 2.5 31,000 77.5 40,982 104.5 Community Playfield (1) 120.5 2.5 311,000 77.5 40,982 104.5 Special Feature 43.5 N/A 31,000 N/A 409982 N/A (1) Includes 6 mixed-use facilities. 79 I -694 270 Parks and Recreational NIMWOOD AVE. Facilities Plan 11i COMPREHENSIVE P_lAN 7Lfm7m==J 0 660 1720 3440 5160 1:T. NORTH O 42 470 • N • � W � u ' Figure 25 S.T.M. 36 KEIIF.i i IAR� f �� CO. a. •02 14 15 4 09 ROSELAWN AVE. 3 11 .17 ® 29 O 8 012 O •30 • 1 3 - 32 , 031 LARPENTEUR AVE. _ I �• N N N 09 s S • NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS' 0 OTHER PARKS AND MARYLAND AVE. 34 1. WESTERN HILLS RECREATIONAL FACILITIES 3. EOGERTON S. EDGERTON ELEMENTARY �..9a "` C 7. MAPLECREST SCHOOL 6 8. KOHLMAN 9. PHALEN-KELLER-SPOON 12. GLOSTER REGIONAL PARK ST 1 LLYATER RD. 14. GLADSTONE 15. WEAVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4 16. ROBINHOOD 17. GLADSTONE COMMUNITY EDU- 3 18. HARVEST CATION CENTER V0 19. NORTH HAZELWOOD 22. JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL NINNENANA AVE. - 20. FOUR SEASONS 24. HARMONY COMMUNITY EDUCA- 21. SHERWOOD TION CENTER 23. WAKEFIELD 27. JOY COUNTY PARK 25. MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 28. ALDRICH ARENA / 26. PLAYCREST 29. GOODRICH GOLF COURSE CONYAY AVE. 30. GOODRICH 31. MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 32. E � 34. BEAVER LAKE COUNTY PARK 35. GERANIUM 36. BEAVER LAKE ELEMENTARY 000 37. GETHSEMANE 41. BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL T. N. 12/1-94 39. LIONS PARK 40. AFTON HEIGHTS 42. CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 45. VISTA HILLS .00 46. PLEASANTVIEW 47. FISH CREEK �• WILLARD MUNGER TRAIL 40• 19 UPPER AfTOM RD. - NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 410 OTHER CRY PARKS STUDY AREAS 2. ROSELAWN POND 4. HERITAGE CENTER 6. KENWOOD LOVER AFTON no. - 10. TIMBER LONDIN LN. -- 43 11. FLICEK `� T 13. LOOKOUT 33. NEBRASKA NAI LAND RD.-- 38. MAPLEWOOD NATURE CENTER 44 43. CRESTVIEW 44. MAILAND LINNOOD AVE. Parks and Recreational NIMWOOD AVE. Facilities Plan 11i COMPREHENSIVE P_lAN 7Lfm7m==J 0 660 1720 3440 5160 1:T. NORTH O 42 470 • N • � W � u ' Figure 25 PARKS POLICY RECOMNENDATIONS Facilities A ..quisition Neighborhood Parks Although population -based park standards show that, overall, Maplewood had adequate acreage devoted to neighborhood parks and community playfields, service -area standards show deficiencies within several neighborhoods. Special Features Discussion occasionally surfaces that some of the Ramsey County Correctional Facility (workhouse farm) property may one day be available for other uses. A special feature facility, such as a golf course, could be developed on this site should it ever become available. Other Facilities The 1989 community survey documented community desires to develop a central community center offering a range of facilities. The City included a community center in its capital ro improvement ram. The Parks and Recreation Department has also identified the need, over P program. the next decade, to develop smaller indoor neighborhood centers which could offer programs in dance, music, theater and a variety of other programs. Open Space Although not a part of the Parks Plan, the Parks Commission will continue to be involved in efforts to protect Maplewood's open space. Open space is defined as undeveloped lands or natural landscape features with scenic aesthetic or conservation value. This includes woodlands, grasslands and wetlands, intended to be preserved in their natural undeveloped state. The City has initiated an inventory of all available undeveloped lands with the intent to identify .key open spaces for possible acquisition and preservation. This is to assure the City retains its unique character while continuing to grow and develop. Areas lor Acquisition • The City will consider developing a neighborhood park in: - The Kohlman Lake neighborhood to service the residents north of Beam Avenue. The Hillside neighborhood to serve the area south of Larpenteur Avenue. a - The Hig hwood neighborhood to serve the area between Linwood and Highwood Avenues. These areas are shown on Figure 25. • Where P neighborhood arks cannot be developed in these neighborhoods, the City will g study the use of mini -parks, multi -use facilities, or open space. • The City will consider the expansion of the following parks: Sherwood Park Geranium Park Gloster Park Goodrich Park Hazelwood Park Hillside Park Maplewood Nature Center • The Cit will monitor the need for acquisition of land for community playfield City ... . development or special feature facilites over the coming years. • The City will target the property at the Ramsey County Correctional Facility for development or a spacial feature park facility if the County stops using the farm land. Community support acquisitionsu rt for the of additional parklands, even if it involves a small increase in taxes was documented in a City-wide telephone survey conducted in the fall of 1989 b Decision Resources Ltd. of Minneapolis. The Parks Plan map, Figure 25, identifies areas y .. . targeted for acquisition and development of additonal neighborhood parks. g q Prog Policies • Maplewood will continue to use the Capital Improvements Plan to plan for the financing of its park facilities. • The Park and Recreation Commission will continue to analyze trends and changes in population characteristics and community and neighborhood demand for recreation services. The Commission will develop programs and policies to meet those demands. PARKS AMON PLAN Table 17 on the following pages lists activities that Maplewood should undertake in the coming years to implement the Parks Plan. This table also shows responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for each activity. The City will periodically review and update this table. TABLE 17 PARKS ACTION PLAN Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Develop additional PKC, PC, CC Ongoing PAF, GF Land Use Plan neighborhood parks and/or Dir of Parks mini parks in the following neighborhoods: Kohlman Lake, Hillside, and Hghwood Explore enlargement PKC, PC, CC 1990-1992 PAF, GF Land Use Plan of Geranium, Gloster, Dir of Parks Sherwood, Goodrich, Hazel- wood, and Hillside Parks and Maplewood Nature Center Monitor need for PKC, PC ongoing PAF, GF Land Use Plan community playfields or Dir of Parks special feature facilities Target County Workhouse PKC, PC, CC ongoing None Ramsey County Farm for park acquisition Dir of Parks if ever phased out Utilize CIP process PKC, PC, CC Ongoing PAF, GF, TIF Land Use Plan to plan for the financing Dir of Parks of park development Develop Centralized PKC, PC, CC ongoing TIF Land Use Plan Community Center Dir of Parks Develop neighborhood PKC, PC, CC 1995 -Ongoing PAF, GF Land Use Plan community centers as Dir of Parks demand and resources warrant Monitor trends and PKC Ongoing None Land Use Plan changes in population Dir of Parks characteristics and Ir demand for services Work with Ramsey County PKC, CC Ongoing None Ramsey County officials to transfer Dir of Parks ownership of nonregional parks to the city TABLE 17 PARKS ACTION PLAN (Continued) Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with If schools are closed PKC, CC Ongoing GF Indepeent School in the future, acquire Districts outdoor recreation facilities for continued use by citizens Assist with the protection PKC, PC, CC Ongoing GF Land Use Plan of wetlands, floodplains Dir of Parks and other critical areas ABBREVIATIONS: PKC = Park and Recreation Commission PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council Dir of Parks = Director of Parks and Recreation PAF = Park Acquisition Funds GF = General Fund TIF =- Tax -Increment Financing 84 TRANSPORTATION PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of the Transportation Plan is to plan for adequate road, transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The City is planning these facilities to complement and support the other Comprehensive Plan elements. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Although Maplewood is a ,developing suburb, its transportation system is well established. The City will, however, need to focus on the following transportation issues: • The implications of LRT service in Maplewood: How the City can maximize the potential for economic development while also minimizing impacts acts on residential areas; how LRT service should be extended to the Maplewood Mall; and how at -grade crossings can be minimized. • The City should coordinate with other agencies to relieve traffic congestion in the Maplewood Mall area. • The City should formulate policies for the location and development of sidewalks and trails. MAJOR STREET SYSTEM Figure 26 shows the planned system of major roads along with the proposed light rail transit routes which have been identified by the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority. The major proposed improvements are in the Mall area: 1. The extension of Kennard Street to County Road D. 2. An east -west collector street between Southlawn Boulevard and Highway 61, north of Beam Avenue. This street would extend across Highway 61 curving north to County Road D. Street Classincation tem Maplewood adopted its street classification system from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council's "Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan." Figure 27 shows typical street sections for each type of road. The road types are described as follows: • Principal Arterials -roadways designed to carry the highest volume of traffic (15,000 + ADT), allow the highest speeds (40-55 mph), satisfy the longest trip desires and provide subregional, regional, and inter -community access. These roadways do not provide direct access to abutting properties. Principal arterials are spaced based on Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) and Ramsey County standards. This roadway type connects with minor arterial and collector streets. • Minor Arterials - roadways that connect two or more subregions, supplement the restricted access arterial system and provide direct access to abutting properties as determined in the Code of Ordinances for the City P of Maplewood, Minnesota Chapter 29 Article IV, Driveways. Spacing of minor arterials is determined by Mn/DOT and Ramsey County standards, with site specific exceptions. This roadway type serves inter- and intra -community needs for trips, carries high traffic volumes (7,000 + ADT), allows moderate -to -high travel speeds (35-50 mph), connects major trip generators, funnels traffic between collectors and restricted access arterials and contains two drive lanes in each direction. • Collector Streets - roadways designed to carry traffic between the arterial system and the local system, convey intra -community traffic between major subdivisions, business centers, industries, parks and the like, and provide direct access to abutting properties. me S.T.Y. 36 CO. RD. s f . r RO8ELhWN Avg. E LhRPZNTEUR "Zo w o r s M � h iJ N �■� PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL ■�■ MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR WK POTENTIAL LRT ALIGNMENT AND STATION LOCATION Major Street System and LRT Plan C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N 0 860 1720 3440 5160 CT. NORTH 87 1 Ei F � � O O w H w � = s d KARYLAND AVZ. STILLWATER RD. XINNZKARA AVE. _ .. CONWAY AVE. T.B. 12/I-94 UPPER AFTON ItD, LOWER AFTON RD._ LONDIN LN. KAILAND RD. - LINWOOD AVL. NIGHWOOD AVt. CRRTSR ATs. - ' r _ • e u _ � u Figure 26 Std• 8hrd. Wcdk 5! d 0 VARIABLE - 6d MIN. vaRu►eUE - sz' wnN. f I I Street Section Minor Arterial Street 66' YNiar Skip Une 44' _ 22' I_ e' Street Section Collector Street Unrestricted Parking b' 60' . 10' 1 36 1 I i ! ' Yip► SNP Lim C sw "ti.u" I i Sidi• BMd. Pmkhq Law 81W. 1 1 Wdk 1 5' 9' 14' 12' 10' 9' 1 1 1 Street Section Collector Street Parking One Side W mumm COY P AENEN S I _P`AN 3 Street Section Typical Residential Street o r 88 Figure 2% This type of roadway carries moderate traffic volumes (1,000 - 7,000 ADT), allows moderate -to -high speeds (30-45 mph) with curves designed for 30 mph travel, satisfies local trip needs and connects local streets with arterials. Spacing of collector streets is generally 1/2 mile. • Local Streets -roadways primarily designed to provide for intra - neighborhood travel needs, directaccess to abutting properties and convey traffic to and from higher level roadways. This type of roadway carries the lowest traffic volumes (generally less than 1,000 ADT), allows low speeds (maximum 30 mph) and the horizontal curves need not accommodate 30 mph travel. Spacing of local streets is one block or as needed. STREET SYSTEM POLICIES • The City will continue to design and maintain its roads and review site plans according to the functional classification system of roads illustrated by Figure 26, and the design standards illustrated in Figure 27. These standards will ensure that streets serve the City's needs and enhance regional efforts to reduce traffic congestion. • The City will do what it can to help implement improvements to the metropolitan highway system planned through 2010, although locations for those improvements would most likely occur on state or county rights-of-way. • The City will do what it can to manage the impacts on local streets caused by the queuing of vehicles at meters and bypass ramps. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT POLICIES Travel demand management (TDM) is designed to increase the number of people who share rides and who travel outside of rush hours. These techniques are expected of communities in the metropolitan area served by congested portions of the metropolitan highway system and of cities that have regional business concentrations. It has proven to be far more cost- effective to promote TDM and transit than to try to build more highway lanes. The 3M Company, Maplewood's major employer with over 12,000 employees, is also one of the region's leaders in developing ridesharing programs. The company maintains 105 employee -operated vans providing service to 850 employees. 3M has been supporting ridesharing for over rjy 16 years and its Rideshaze Services Department also coordinates commuter van services for other 3M facilities across the United States. • Maplewood has a mixture of housing and commercial which may help to reduce travel on the metropolitan highway system by allowing people to live near their place of work. The Land Use Plan continues that pattern. • The City urges the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council to conduct educational programs to encourage ride sharing, staggered work hours and off-peak travel. Such campaigns can be most effectively mounted at the metropolitan level. TRANSIT POLICIES Effective use of transit can make a significant difference in the level of congestion in certain corridors. Currently, the City is served by 19 Metropolitan Transit Service (MTC) regular bus routes and two express routes operated by North Suburban Lines. Maplewood has two park-and-ride lots with a total capacity of 55 parking spaces. One -hundred thirty-four residents and five area businesses participate in the Minnesota Rideshare Program, Dial -A -Ride The Morley Bus Company operates a general purpose dial -a -ride service called the Northeast St. Paul Transit service (NEST). Metro Mobility and the Independent School District 622 Seniors Program provide special transportation services for the elderly and disabled. Light Rail.Transit The Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA) has developed a twenty-year LRT Plan. This plan calls for two light rail corridors providing service through Maplewood: the Northeast Corridor, providing service along I -35E or the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, and the East Corridor, which would use either Minnehaha Avenue or I-94. Preliminary analysis is underway on the design for the Northeast Corridor. Five station locations have been identified to provide service in Maplewood. Figure 26 shows the routes and potential station locations. Ramsey County officials have not yet determined whether or how Maplewood Mall would be linked with a light rail line. The RCRRA will analyze this issue during design development of the Northeast Corridor, The Ramsey County Comorehensive LRT Plan also identifies an east -west crosstown LRT alignment which would parallel TH 36 as it passes through Maplewood. This latter line is part of the Phase H Plan which the RCRRA is not scheduling for implementation until after 2010. Light Rail Transit Policies • The City will continue to actively participate in the planning for light rail transit systems in the City. • Maplewood will work closely with RCRRA officials in the siting and design of potential LRT station locations, including park-and- ride facilities. These stations should maximize access for residents and complement the City's land use plan. • The RCRRA should provide an LRT line to the Maplewood Mall with a station. • The RCRRA should place a high priority on providing as many grade -separated roadway crossings as possible along LRT lines. • The RCRRA should bridge over the planned east -west road, between Beam Avenue and County Road D. Transit Service Policies • The City supports MTC's construction of new or improved bus stops and shelters. • The City supports efforts by the MTC to focus service on the Maplewood Mall transit hub, improve off-peak service and improve express service to St. Paul. • The City will review major new developments for inclusion of bus shelters and pull-outs, if such sites are along MTC bus routes. • The City will coordinate its sidewalk plan to encourage bus usage. 91 BICYCLIST AND PEDESTRIAN POLICIES The City recognizes that walking and bicycling are alternative forms of transportation for significant numbers of people. In a community survey conducted in the fall of 1989 by Decision Resources, 75Pe rcent of the respondents supported construction of a city-wide trail system. This finding is consistent with surveyresults which also showed. that walking, g hiking, jogging and bicycling are among the most popular outdoor activities in Maplewood. • The City will develop a coordinated sidewalk and trails system. • There should be sidewalks along all minor arterial and collector streets, as shown in Figure 26. On minor arterial streets, there should be an off-street sidewalk or a bituminous trail on each side. Each collector street should have an on -street trail. • where there are no streets, there should be.off-street trails provided to sites which are generators of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. • The City will plan the funding of City -constructed sidewalks through the capital improvements program. Ramsey County should maintain paved shoulders along county roads. • The City will design sidewalks and trails which: - Are coordinated with school district busing policies. - Are within one mile of parks, community facilities, shopping and schools. - Encourage transit usage. - Provide linkages to existing trails in parks. - Support County and regional trails systems. • The City does not remove snow from sidewalks. Figure 28 shows the Bikeways/Trails Plan. TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN Table 18 on page 95 lists activities that Maplewood should undertake in the coming years to implement the Transportation Plan. This table also shows the responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for each activity. The City will periodically review and update this table. 92 In addition to City projects, there are several large State projects planned through Maplewood: 1. Additional lanes on I-94 from Century Avenue to McKnight Road and revised access to 3M. An additional lane on I-94 may be a high -occupancy -vehicle (HOV) lane. It may extend from downtown Saint Paul all the way east to Hudson, Wisconsin. Since much of the land to the south is a regional park and 3M has developed the land to the north, these changes should not effect the land use plan. The City will work with the -State and 3M in the planning of these changes to coordinate any necessary City transportation changes. 2. The addition of an HOV lane, metered ramps and HOV bypasses of those ramps on Highway 36. This work will eliminate signalized intersections and close several .accesses to Highway 36. The. City is also planning a new interchange at -the BN Corridor. 3. A new interchange at Courtly Road and I-494 in Woodbury would connect to Century Avenue. This change would affect traffic levels and the intersection with Century Avenue. IMaplewood, however, will continue to plan for low-density residential development in this area. 93 BEAK AVE• - 14 Co. AD, C a.r.E. 34 a 00. RD. a --r•-- JJY ROBELhWN AVE. l i LARIPBUTSUR Avg. • O � e o N = w H V ~ v h 8 EXISTING BIKEWAYS ON STREET 0.0,09•0 OFF STREET PLANNED BIKEWAYS ON STREET a._ M OFF STREET BIKEWAYS/TRAILS PLAN C O M P mom � h 0 P _ M L A N R E H E N S I V E XMARYLAVD AVE. BR.vca �..: 7L:�J 0 860 1720 3440 5160 CT NORTr1 94 I ' p h � h 0 _ M OI a � � i �t XMARYLAVD AVE. BR.vca �..: BTILLWATER RD, KZNNExAKA Avg- CONWAY Avg. T.N. 12/I-94 UPPER AFTON RD. LOWER AFTON RD. LONDIN LN. KAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. NIGHWOOD Avg. - CARTER Avir. .m s 1 / K n x h x V Fi�rr� � TABLE 18 TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN Actions Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Maintain local streets Engineer Ongoing GF Utility Projects Dir of CD Mnumize excessive non- Engineer Ongoing GF Land Use Plan local traffic on Dir of CD residential streets Encourage link between PC, CC, 1992-2000 GF Land Use Plan Beam Avenue and County Engineer Mn/DOT RamCo Road D Dir of CD RamCo Facilitate freeway Engineer 1992-2000 Mn/DOT Mn/DOT ramp metering and queuing Review major site PC, Ongoing GF plans to promote Dir of CD transit usage Continue mixture of PC, Ongoing GF Land Use Plan land uses Dir of CD Promote use of PC, CC Ongoing None MTC transit Dir of CD Participate in LRT PC, CC, Ongoing None RCRRA planning Dir of CD Promote new public Dir of CD, Ongoing GF MTC and private bus Engineer shelters Promote improved bus PC, HRA, CC Ongoing GF MTC and transit service Relieve mall area Engineer, CC Ongoing GF Mn./DOT traffic congestion Mn/DOT RamCo RamCo 95 TABLE 18 TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN (Continued) Actions Responsibility Timine Funding Coordinate with— Provide ith Provide sidewalks Engineer Ongoing GF along arterials and collector streets Coordinate sidewalks PC, PKC, Ongoing GF and trails with schools, Engineer, parks, shopping, transit, Dir of CD and regional plans ABBREVIATIONS: PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council PKC = Park and Recreation Commission Dir of CD = Director of Community Development Engineer = City Engineer/Public Works Director GF = General Fund Mn/DOT Minnesota Department of Transportation RCRRA = Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority MTC = Metropolitan Transit Commission Ramco = Ramsey County HRA = Housing and Redevelopment Authority CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND SANITARY SEWER PLANS The City's Capital Improvement and Sanitary Sewer Plans .are separate documents that the City has adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. 97 To: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Introduction MEMORANDUM City Manager Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Sterling -Schaller Easements, Project 87-45 June 8, 1992 Attached are maps to clarify the easements being negotiated. Background AGENDA ITEM I-2 Action by Council: Endorsed Modified Rejected Date If the city is unable to reach an agreement with both Jirovec and Kayser, then Sterling Street cannot be built as a state aid project south of Linwood. A preliminary agreement was reached with the Jirovecs which included removal of two existing storage buildings in the vicinity of the proposed new roadway. However, Mr. Jirovec refused to consider consummating this agreement when he was informed that the size of the new storage building he intended to build east of his residence would require a variance. The Jirovecs will not agree to move buildings as a condition of right-of-way and easement acquisition until such time that the requested variance is approved. With. normal processing of the variance request, the right-of-way cannot be obtained early enough to allow the project to be practically started in 1992. Due to the lack of redundancy in the water supply system in this area, it is strongly recommended that the city not wait another year before making any improvements. As a minimum, the elevated storage tank should be connected to the system at Hillwood Drive and Linwood Avenue in 1992. The Jirovecs were asked about their position in the. event that the city decided to only build the improvements on Linwood and north this year. If this were to be done it would be necessary to obtain storm sewer and ponding easements from the Jirovecs. They are willing to sell the city right-of-way and drainage and ponding easements for the previously agreed $25,000. Under this agreement, there would be no road or utility construction and any associated assessments south of Linwood. The agreement would not call for removal of the existing storage buildings. As a straight forward cash deal, this proposal is well below the range of cost that the city would have to pay for the value of the land to be obtained. Project 87-45 2 June 8, 1992 Recommendation It is recommended that authorization to pay the Jirovecs $25,000 for right-of-way and easements. This would allow construction this year of the roadway and utilities on Linwood and north. BAI jc Attachments (1) MARNiE s? H C__.._. . _Iry Q I 4 CiA rs r STERLING STREET MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA ENCINEERS 8 PLANNERS O O O O O Z O Z 1 7/26/91 FILE N0. 92004 DRG. N0. N /< '4 \ C -Z 0 O. z U) CD Ld Lli w z cc: z F- U) (D 0 z 0 0 4z 7 A UNWOOD AVE. E. 0 Cn .59 e nis wwoo cl- Lij CC. \ , r -o tie ,. Od 001 1000 fi . F cc U) O. z U) CD Ld Lli w z cc: z F- U) (D 0 z 0 0 4z 7 A A AGENDA ITEM Action by Council: Endorsed Modified-. Rejected - Date A petition has been received requesting all -way stop signs at Beam and Frank. Construction has not yet been completed in this area but will be complete very soon. Traffic will indeed .increase. Since these are residential- streets in a developing, single-family neighborhood, it is appropriate to install traffic control at this time. The city council has addressed situations similar to this in the past. Warrants for stop signs are not attained at this intersection. However, from a neighborhood perspective, all -way stop signs are appropriate. It is recommended all -way stop signs beinstalled at the intersection of Beam Avenue and Frank Street as soon as practical. KG H jW AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Beam Avenue and Frank Street—Stop Signs DATE: June 15, 1992 AGENDA ITEM Action by Council: Endorsed Modified-. Rejected - Date A petition has been received requesting all -way stop signs at Beam and Frank. Construction has not yet been completed in this area but will be complete very soon. Traffic will indeed .increase. Since these are residential- streets in a developing, single-family neighborhood, it is appropriate to install traffic control at this time. The city council has addressed situations similar to this in the past. Warrants for stop signs are not attained at this intersection. However, from a neighborhood perspective, all -way stop signs are appropriate. It is recommended all -way stop signs beinstalled at the intersection of Beam Avenue and Frank Street as soon as practical. KG H jW TO: Maplewood City Council April 9 1992 MAY 19 I�'�? TRAFFIC ALERT TRAFFIC ALERT TRAFFIC ALERT TRAFFIC ALERT TRAFFIC ALERT TRAFFIC ALERT To whom it may concern, Oue to the steady increase of traffic on Beam Ave. west of Highway 61 to County Rd. ID We have observed cars and truck,;trave I i ng in excess of 30-40 miles per hour. We fee the potential for accidents has increased greatly at the intersection 6 'Beam Ave. and Frank St,. We petition the City of Maplewood to install a THREE WAY STOP at this intersection. Also we would like to have two SLOW CHILDREN sighs installed. One on Beam Ave. as you turn west off of Highway 61 and one as you turn south off of County Rd. D. During the spring of 1991 the city Manager Micheal McGuire agreed to install the slow children signs after recieving a letter from Juliann Baughman who lives at 1200 Beam Ave. We would now Iike to see these signs installed. Thank you, Concerned parents of Beam Ave. and Frank St. ADDRESS l n ZIVIZ j 17/ n. OFFICE OF CITY MANAGER 612-770-4524 June 5, 1991 Ms. Juliann Baughman 11 4i`� 1,200 Beam Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Ms. Baughman: I received your "TELL IT TO THE CITY MANAGER. card in April about your traffic concerns . P in the area. I apologize for my slow response to your card. We received many more requests than I had anticipated, and our Public Works Department staff has been verybusy Y researching each individual response. I am pleased to tell you that a SLOW CHILDREN westjust si n will be installed on Beam g of Highway 61 later this summer. The City is scheduling a roadway construction project for your area this summer, and as soon as that project is complete, our Public Works Department will install the sign. Thank you for mailing in your. card from the Maplewood in Motion. If you would like any other concerns addressed, please contact me. �.;.crciy, 01 Michael A. McGuire City Manager cc: Mr. Ken Haider, Director of Public Works Equal Opporttuiity Einplovcr AGENDA REPORT AGENDA ITEM Action by Council: Endorsed TO: City Manager Modifies Rejected FROM: City Engineer Date - SUBJECT: Keller Parkway—No Parking DATE: June 15, 1992 Attached is a letter from Mr. Tim Gallivan, a resident on Keller Parkway. The citywide water main project was recently completed in this area. New sod was installed adjacent to the pavement. Parking- off the: road would ruin the new sod. Mr. Gallivan requests no parking in the area to protect the area. It is recommended that Ramsey County be requested to designate the east side of Keller .Parkway from the Spoon Lake Bridge to Palm Court as a no parking area. KGH IW Attachment Highland Park Office 897 St. Paul Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 612/698-2481 Fax 612/698-9356 May 29 1992 Mr. Mike McGuire, City Administrator City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. McGuire: Please consider this request to permanently affix "NO PARKING" signs on the east side of Keller Parkway between the south entrance of Gar 1 a Lane and the bridge crossing over to Spoon Lake. The purpose for this request is because of the wonderful sodding job recently completed on that stretch of Keller Parkway, after installing city water. The current Gond i t i on' of that soil and sod is very soft and re l at i.ve ly mushy as the grass is just'starting to take hold in the soil. If cars were to be allowed to park on that side of the road as they have in years past, they typically pull up onto where they would be destroying this newly laid sod. Your immediate attention to this matter is respectfully requested as any delay would definitely cause immediate and future problems with the aesthetics of the newly laid sod. Sincerely Tim .i u.a Sales Manager TG/CGA TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish .Highwood-McKnight Storm Sewer, City Project 90-10 June 11, 1992 AGENDA ITEM c.ti.M' by Council: Endorsed Modifie l Rei e e t e rl....�....,...�. Date.. Introduction The contract for this project has been awarded. It is appropriate to prepare for the assessment hearing. Background ound The assessments for this project are to be units of $525 for residential properties. The assessments only fund a portion of project costs. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. BAI jc Attachment RESOLUTION ORDERING. PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the city clerk and city engineer have received bids for the improvement of Highwood-McKnight Storm Sewer, City Project 90-10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CIN COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the city clerk and city engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the city office for inspection. FURTHER, the clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the council thereof.