Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1992 03-23 City Council Packet
AMENDED AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 -P.M., Monday, March 23, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 92 -06 A.- CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C.. ROLL CALL D< APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1, Council /Manager Meeting: March 2, 1991 2. Meeting No. 92 -05 (March 9, 1992) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. APPOINTMENTS 1. Planning Commission Appointment Fe CONSENT.AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2, HRA Reappointment 3. Conditional Use Permit Review: 1661 Cope Avenue (Credit Union) 4. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2720 Maplewood Drive (A -Gem Auto) 5. Conditional Use Permit Review: 600 Carlton Street (3 -M Classroom) 6. Acceptance of Project - Conway Overlay Project 91 -03 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M., Conditional Use Permit: 47 So. Century Ave. (Lutheran Church of Peace) 2. 3. 7:10 P.M., Preliminary Plat: Countryview Summit 7:40 P.M., Maplewood Estates, 2nd Addition Land Use Plan Change (4 Votes) Street Vacation Preliminary Plat Zoning Map Change (4 Votes) H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Je NEW BUSINESS 1. Front Setback Appeal: 1460 Myrtle Court 2. Design Review: 1770 Gervais Ave. (Schwan's Enterprises, Inc.) 3. Revision of Conditions and Time Extensions: Highwood Meadows Preliminary Plat (Kayser) 4. Authorization for Preliminary Architectural Design of Proposed Community Center 5. Comprehensive Plan Update (4 Votes) 6. Conditional Use Permit Review Process Ordinance (1st Reading) 7. Roselawn Reconstruction Project 87 -01 a St. Paul Water Utility Agreement b. Little Canada Agreement c_._ Concurrence of Award 8, Resolution: Legislative Redistricting K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1s 2. 3. 4, M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. N. ADJOURNMENT p -� COUNCI14MANAGER MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 4:30 p.m., -Monday, March 2, 1992 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Carlson at 4 :30 p.m. Be . ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Absent Councilperson Dale Carlson Present Councilperson Fran Juker Present (Arrived at 4:35 p.m.) Councilperson George Rossbach Present Councilperson Joseph Zappa Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda: D. OLD BUSINESS S. Letter from Shinders 6. General Condition of City E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Setbacks 2. Communi Center Update 3. Planning Commission Interviews 4. Personnel- Related Litigation Update 1 F. FUTURE TOPICS a City Manager McGuire announced that the Council will meet with the Ramsey County Library Board at the April 6, 1992 Council /Manager meeting from 6 p.m to 7 p.m. Councilmember Zappa moved that the agenda be approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rossbach and was approved. Ayes: Carlson, Juker, Rossbach, and Zappa Absent: Bastian D. OLD BUSINESS 1. Discussion of 1992 Council /Staff Retreat City Manager McGuire and Councilpersons Zappa, Rossbach, Juker and Carlson reported their comments about the Council /Staff retreat in late - January. It was the consensus of the Council that further discussion on the topic should be conducted with Mayor Bastian present, and this item should be placed on a future Council /Manager meeting agenda. 2. Renewal of National League of Cities Membership After some discussion about the value of the membership, it was the consensus of the Council that the City not renew its annual membership. p 3. 1810 E. County Road B - Garage and Final Renovation Costs City Manager McGuire reported that an individual was interested in removing the garage for personal use. It was the consensus of the Council that the garage remain with the Fire Department for burning exercises. City Manager McGuire reviewed the list of ro osed final renovation costs P p submitted to the Council for the new Parks & Recreation maintenance building. It was the consensus of the Council that a list of minimal required upgrades and associated costs be organized and brought back to the Council for review and approval; and after occupying he building for g g one year, this item should be brought back to the Council for consideration of additional improvements. 4. Update on City Manager's 1991 -1992 Objectives City Manager McGuire distributed copies of supportive information about the status of his 1991 -1992 objectives. After some discussion City Manager McGuire asked that the Council review the document and submit their comments to him. The City Council directed City Manager McGuire to organize some measurable annual objectives for each department to support the their departmental goals. 2 5. Letter from Shinders Councilperson Zappa requested that Chief Collins respond to a letter received from Shinders regarding cities' policies of bad check P rosecution. It was the consensus of the Council that City Manager McGuire would notify Councilperson Zappa of the Chiefs ro osed response and if P P P dissatisfied, Councilperson Zappa will place it back on an agenda. 6. General Condition of City Councilperson Zappa stated his desire that all City employees become more observant of the code violations within the City and report those violations to the proper department for enforcement. City Manager McGuire stated that he would speak to department heads about reminding and encouraging employees to be aware of violations and report them when traveling throughout the City. E. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Setbacks Councilperson Rossbach was concerned with the recent increase in number of setback variances being granted particularly for single family Y homes located on cul -de -sacs. It was the consensus of the Council that Councilperson Rossbach place this item on a regular Council meeting agenda. 2. Update on Community Center City Manager McGuire explained the selection process being used to choose the firm that will provide the relimina architectural de for p ry gn the proposed community center. He stated that the interview team of the Parks & Recreation Director, Public Works Director Assistant Ci ry Manager and himself will be interviewing five of the original twenty three firms that submitted proposals; the interviews are scheduled for Thursday, March 5th; staffs recommendation will be part of the March 23, 1992 Council meeting; and the recommended firm will be invited to meet the City Council immediately following the March 19th pre- agenda meeting. 3. Planning Commission Candidates Interviews The City Council interviewed three candidates for the vacancy on the Planning Commission: David Hughes, She Allens ach and David g � P Kopesky. Following the interviews, it was the consensus of the City Council to vote on the candidates with a ranked ballot and place the official appointment on the March 23, 1992 Council meeting agenda. 3 4. Personnel-Related Liti Update Cit Mana McGuire provided a, brief update on the status of pendin personnel-related liti Councilpe Juker re that the Cit Attorne provide a written opinion re g ardin g g ardin g the Cit Council's abilit to take official actions at Council/Mana and pre- a meetin F. FUTURE TOPICS There, was no discussion about future topics. G. ADJOURNMENT The meetin was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. 11 i ii MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P X , Monday, March 9, 1992 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No,, 92 -05 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Acting Mayor Carlson. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Absent Dale N. Carlson, Acting Mayor Present Frances L. Juker, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present Joseph A. Zappa, Councilmember Present D._ APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Meeting No. 92 -04 (February 24, 1992 ) Councilmember Zappa moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 92 -04 (February 24 . 1992) . as corrected. 1. Page 13, Item 3a: Add "to the citizens" 2. Page 5, Item Glg: "Seconded by Councilmember Zappa" Seconded by Acting Mayor Carlson Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. Councilmember Rossbach moved to aDprove the Agenda as amended: L -1 Clean -Up Ordinance L -2 Assessment Letter 1 3 -9 -92 F.. CONS ENT AGENDA Councilmember Rossbach moved, seconded by_Councilmember Juker: ayes to apDrove.the consent agenda items 1 2 and 4 as recommended. Item F -3 moved to become J -61 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 243 Checks #25329 - #25400 Dated 2 -13 -92 thru 2 -28 -92 ,S 121,661.61 Checks #16414 - #16519 Dated 3 -9 -92 $ 365 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 201 Payroll Checks #25422 thru #25594 dated 2 -28 -92 S 39,214.40 Payroll Deduction Checks #25599 thru #25614 dated 2 -28 -92 $ 240,.596.77 Total Payroll 6064107.69 GRAND TOTAL 2. Budget Transfer - . Ramsey Co. Overlay Agreement Approved a budget transfer of X24,771 from the General Fund Contingency Account to the Public Works Street Maintenance General Fund account to pay Ramsey County. 3. Conditional Use Permit Review: English St. & Highway 36 - (English Place) Moved to become J -6 4. Resolution Accepting Election Judges 92 -03 -26 ACCEPTING ELECTION JUDGES RESOLVED, that the City Council following list of Election Judges Election, Tuesday, April 7, 1992: PRECINCT N0, 1 Milo Thompson, Chair Irene A. Ling Rose Marie Manders PRECINCT N0, 2 Pat Thompson, Chair Jean Dickson Kathleen Dittel Evelyn Axdahl of Maplewood, Minnesota, accepts the for the 1992 Presidential Primary PRECINCT NO. 8 Lorraine Fischer, Chair Rita Frederickson Edith Stottlemyer Betty Berglund PRECINCT NO. 9 Lucille Cahanes, Chair Delores Schipp Margaret Mcdonald Phyl1 is Lofgren 3 -9 -92 t PRECINCT NO. 3 Richard Wolszon, Chair Doris Broady Annette LaCasse Al ice .Miller PRECINCT NO. 4 LeAnn Kaup, Chair Thelma Ling Caroline Warner Betty Eddy PRECINCT NO. 5 Elsie Wiegert, Chair Emma K1 ebe Phyllis Erickson Marcella Watson PRECINCT NO, 6 Kathy Supan, Chair Judy Widholm Sandy Jones Gunborg Mowchan PRECINCT NO. 7 Betty Haas,, Chair Armel1a Podgorski Joan Cottrell Lorraine Steinbring PRECINCT NO. 10 Pat Werden Chair Diane Galaski Ann Fosburgh Mary Lou Li eder PRECINCT NO, 11 Shirley Luttrell, Chair Delores Lofgren Mable Abbott Helen King PRECINCT NO. 12 Mary Libhardt, Chair Mildred Dehen Audrey Duellman Deloris Fastner PRECINCT NO 13 Donald Wiegert, Chair Ted Haas Richard Lofgren Bill Schnellman PRECINCT NO. 14 Margaret Earley, Chair Grace Lock Elsie Anderson G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. (6:06 P.M.), Conditional Use Permit: 1900 E. Co. Rd. D (Kidsports) a. Acting Mayor Carlson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an indoor recreation center. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Gehrke presented the Planning Commission report. e. Acting Mayor Carlson opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard. Chris Larsen, Larsen Doran Partnership, applicant David Powell, The Gymania Corp., applicant f. Acting Mayor Carlson closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its a doption: 3 3 -9 -92 92 - 03 - 27 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION GYNANIA CORPORATION WHEREAS, Gymania Corporation applied for a conditional use permit to operate an indoor recreation center. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1900 East County Road D. The legal description is: Lot 2, Block 1, Maplewood Mall Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except that part lying easterly of a line described as f Beginning at a point on the north line of said Lot 2, distant 325.83 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence South, parallel with the east line of said Lot 2, to the south l i n e of said. Lot 2 and there terminating. Subject to easements, if any. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on March 2, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve said permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on March 9, 1992. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of- operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 4 3 -9 -92 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. R 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the City Council reviewing t h i s permit, one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City code. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all h. Councilmember Zappa moved to request staff, to review the "re_ creat_i_o_n uses" in the BC Zone and report back to Council. Seconded by Councilmember_Juker Ayes - all H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Toro Mower a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 -03 -28 AWARD OF BID - TORO MOWER BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Minnesota Toro, Inc. in the amount of $11,750 plus trade-in is the lowest responsible bid for furnishing one 72 -inch -cut rotary mower with accessories and the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 2. Landscape Architect for Pleasantview Park a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks and Recreation Odegard presented, the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Carver presented the Park and Recreation Commission report. d. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the recommendation that. Brauer & Associated LTD be hired as the architects for Pleasantview Park at a fee not to exceed 17,140: and the .proper offi c i al s be di rected to execute the contract as attached: and that funds be aDDropri ated from the Neighborhood PAC charges. Seconded by Acting Mayor Carlson 5 Ayes - Acting Mayor Carlson, Councilmembers Rossbach, Juker Nays - Councilmember Zappa 3 -9 -92 I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ° 1. Conditi=onal Use Permit: Demont Ave. between Flandrau St. & Bittersweet Lane (Kavanagh) a.. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report c. Councilmember Zappa moved to waive the Rules of Procedure to hear further testimon ,, Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all d. Acting Mayor Carlson asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The. following were heard: David Busch, Attorney representing the Wessins John Daubney, Attorney for John Kavanagh Bill Burns, 2521 Bittersweet Lane e. Councilmember Rossbach moved to table until April 13, 1992. Seconded by Acting Mayor Carlson Ayes - all 2. Street Vacation: Demont Ave. West of Bittersweet Lane (Burns) a. Councilmember Juker moved to table this Item (J-2) unt i 1 April 13. 1992. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 3. Bui.l ding Relocation Ordinance (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Juker introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 700 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE REQUIREMENT FOR STREET REPAIR ESCROWS FOR BUILDING MOVERS The Mapl -ewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: I. Change Section 9 -64 (b) as follows: Subsection (1): Delete 2. Subsections (2) through (5): Renumber as appropriate This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage. Seconded by Acting Mayor Carlson Ayes - all 6 3 -9 -92 4. Rental Property Licensing and Inspection: a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report, b. Director of Community Development Olson resented the specifics ecifics of the report, p Licensing c. Councilmember Zappa moved not toregu i re licensing.. .Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all Truth in Housing Inspections d. Councilmember Zappa moved to continue to reau -ire compliance, Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Rental Housing Maintenance Ordinance (Ist Reading) e Councilmember Zappa moved first reading of an Ordinance updating the rental housing maintenance code. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all 5. Request for Extension of Tree Trimming Ordinance a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa moved to approve a 60 -day extension for Northern States Power to work with staff on drafting a tree- trimminq ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Bituminous Overlay - 11th Avenue a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the .report. c. Councilmember Juker moved to authorize an agreement with North St. Paul to overlay 11th Avenue from White Bear Avenue to McKnight ,Road and that a budge of $25,000 be established and financed by M u n i c i p a l State Aid. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 7 3 -9 -92 2. Highwood McKnight Outlet, Project 90 -10: Approve Plans a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following „ and moved its adOation: 92 - 03 - 29 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution passed by the city Council on February 24 1992, plans and specifications for Highwood- McKnight Storm Sewer Outlet, Project 90 -10, have been prepared under the direction of the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the off i ei al paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under-such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered by the Council at 10:00 a.m., on the 3rd day of April, 1992, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive, open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council w i l l consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of April 13, 1992. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 3. Cooperative Agreement - Roselawn Ave, Project 87 -01 a. Councilmember Juker moved to table this item until an agreement is forthcominq from the necessary parties. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 8 3 -9 -92 4. Rice Street Signal Agreement a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Councilmember Zappa - introduced the fol.lowinc Resolution and moved its adoption: 92 - 03 - 30 RESOLUTION RICE STREET SIGNAL AGREEMENT .BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals with street lights,. emergency vehicle pre= emption, interconnect and signing. on Truck Highway . No. 49 (Rice Street) at Wheelock Parkway, County State Aid Highway No. 30 (Larpenteur Avenue), County State Aid Highway No. 25 (County Road B), Minnesota Avenue, and at County Road B2; revise the existing traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre=emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 49 (Rice Street) at County State Aid Highway No. 26 (Roselawn Avenue) - McCarron Street in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 69107, a copy of which was before the Council.. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 5. Open House Committee - LCMR Grant Application a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Acting Mayor Carlson moved to approve the application for a LCMR Grant. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 6. Conditional Use Permit Review: English St. & Highway 36 (English Place) (Moved from Consent Agenda G -3) a. Councilmember Juker stated she believes this Conditional Use Permit should be reviewed. b. Richard Ernst, 5505 *Golfview, Oakdale, presented his views on the matter. c. Councilmember Zappa moved to refer this matter to staff. for traffic study and report back to Council on April 13, 19,92. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes - all Is 9 3 -9 -92 K K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS I. Gary Gherke, 1252 Cape Avenue Q a. - Mr. Gherke inquired whether Mr. Ernst's project is going to be done in stages. b. Mr. Ernst stated the project would be developed in one stage. L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Clean -Up Ordinance a. Councilmember Juker stated the City needs a better ordinance to better clean up the City. b. Councilmember Carlson moved to refer the matter to staff to review the current ordinance to find` a better way to enforce clean. uD of aroDerty. Seconded by Councilmember Juker Ayes all 2. Assessment Letter Council directed staff to review the assessment letter for possible . . revisions. M.. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS NONE N. ADJOURNMENT Meeting Adjourned at 9:19 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 10 3 -9 -92 254 .-- 1 Aotion by Council: Endorse ]Wodif e r --- - . — ._ MEMORANDUM Rej ecte . - TO: City Manager er Date --- FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment DATE: March 13, 1992 INTRODUCTION Bob Cardinal created a vacancy on the Planning Commission when he resigned. His term expires on December 31, 1993. I have included the applications with this memo for the top three candidates, along with maps showing all the applicants' and commissioners' homes. BACKGROUND February 3: The Planning Commission interviewed and voted on eight candidates for the vacancy. The Commission recommended that the Council interview the top three candidates. The results of the voting are in the meeting minutes attached to this report. March 2: The Council interviewed the top three candidates. The Council decided to vote on the candidates with written ballots before the March 23 meeting. The results of the voting are: Sherry Allenspach 10.5 David Kopesky 8.5 David Hughes 8.0 I invited Sherry Allenspach to the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Appoint someone to fill the unexpired term of Bob Cardinals go /memo13.mem (6.1 Commission Terms) Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Membership 2. Planning Commission Membership 3. 3 applications 4. Minutes Planning Commission Membership I . 2. 3C 4. 5, 6 7. 8 9. 10. Lester G. Axdah 1 Lorraine B. Fischer Roger Anitzberger Brian Sinn Marvin S i gmu nd i k Mary Martin William Rossbach Gary Gerke Jack Frost Gary Pearson 3 WIN i 0 Q 0 W • w v 4 .. • 1 i 1 .. s.r w 1 1 -� l•V , Attachment 1 1 •a ss.•.,K•c�w :c n �. e yew• � �� ,.� i Warm POR ICE T W � - Flo Planning Commission Membership I . 2. 3C 4. 5, 6 7. 8 9. 10. Lester G. Axdah 1 Lorraine B. Fischer Roger Anitzberger Brian Sinn Marvin S i gmu nd i k Mary Martin William Rossbach Gary Gerke Jack Frost Gary Pearson 3 WIN i 0 Q 0 W • w v 4 .. • 1 i 1 .. s.r w 1 1 -� l•V , Attachment 1 1 •a ss.•.,K•c�w :c n �. re , -.arf � f a• ' % •4.*. •i .... City of M a p lewood S ��� ~'� 3 1 � s +r C !:. r!• .« >, g q w. /• L .' +• 8 .. ^_ ! 1 •. �.•q i•� .r • Planning Commission Applicants 1. Theresa Lekon' 2. Eugene Lund* 3. Brian Larson 4. i 50 Larry Hendrickson 6. David Borri 7. Joyce Rasing 8. Richard Jary 9. Thomas Lehmann 10. Davi lopes ky 11. David Hughes 12. Art Wilde �s rflwl in A !, -�,• 01, Planning Commission Applicants 1. Theresa Lekon' 2. Eugene Lund* 3. Brian Larson 4. Sherry A1lenspach 50 Larry Hendrickson 6. David Borri 7. Joyce Rasing 8. Richard Jary 9. Thomas Lehmann 10. Davi lopes ky 11. David Hughes 12. Art Wilde *Applied for previous vacancy as well. 4 Attachment 2 PRO IQ 1 1 �, •� l•3r i 1 i = i a res.••Ni - �A :C wt PRO IQ 1 1 �, •� l•3r i 1 i = i a res.••Ni - �A :C CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION FORM pie - 7 - �;� =-,* 7f NAME A&- PHON E � - � `�� ADDRESS l �, .�". �;�;� ZIP 1 77 1) How long have you lived i n the City of Map1 ewood? a cy 2) Does your employment require travel or being away from the community which would make regular attendance at meetings difficult.? Yes V No 3) On which Board or Commission are you interested . i n serving? (check) _Community Design Review Board Park & Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Authority _Planning Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Conmmi s s i on 4) Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of respons ( 5) List other organi or clubs in the Community in which you have been or are an active participant: 6) Why would you like to serve on this Board or Commission? \j ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 11 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS j 1� APPLICANT INFORMATION DATE: NAME PHONE: (H) ADDRESS d; 1. How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? LJ�V/05 2. Does your employment require travel or being away from g y the community which would make reaular attendance at meetings Yes No difficult? g 3e On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? L- ' * 'Communit Des Rev' • y g Revie Board Park & Recreation Commission "-� Housing & Redevelopment �Planning Comm' Authority Commission Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 4. Do you have any sbecific areas of interest within this Bird's Commiss�jon's scop of resp n 'b' 'ties? % /< r /v 75� L� I 50 List other organizations or clubs in the Communit � wh.' you ha � bee�g or are an a� e part'ci nt: "' � / /* AN �j� �.�ocua�i�v 69 Why woul� y lik to serve on t�iis Board or Commi sion? � J\j co ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: � o� 7�c�T�� i/v �ihi�i�N s?J� C �c�7�" Y < � � ✓1 rJ �' /J�'f" I a � � 6� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICANT INFORMATION DATE : / 'lO ° f4�- NAME (/ !! !l ape 5l v PHONE : (H) f � 5 902 ADDRESS � ��Gf q� G (W) L?'a - 1. How long have you lived in the City of Maplewood? 3,2, iG � 20 Does your employment require travel or being away from the community which would make regular attendance at me tings / difficult? Yes X No hod y h �+ I��yy�gf ��s /s, 9�h�'f'Qf� 4:V4 6j C017 3. On which Board or Commission are you interested in serving? Community Des Review Bo 4 y g and Park &Recreation Commission Housing & Redevelopment Planning Commission Authority Human Relations Commission Police Civil Service Commission 40 Do you have any specific areas of interest within this Board's or Commission's scope of responsibilities? Z�OfZi�lq�, �br�S�v�t�� �lGC �SIJFI?2��h 0 .Ilq'f lvl ile cv-e R -5- ,p i-ev-e: i l e a 5. List other o anizations of clubs in the Community in hich you have been or are an active participant: C, rh�,.41ee acrl- lope 4e,,lc A/ VA 60 Why would you like to servg on th eslla;nr Commission? a ' le GI�G l` /fyle �5/ �� � ,L �l1yr //�f�y�S�� ih �dtf/ �t xavf eReGrl Off'` ��� /1�i�� ����/ e� ���s ADDITIONAL COMMENTS : , 7/ if l � Q« • /�/ � QS - Sf / P f���i�j��S /A � y� 9 lleo-- CO�/�IGI�� !'�%�`G�°2� / 1 4:�-Ofe!�e az 400�4 Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 2 -.3 -92 d. Interviews of Applicants for Planning Commission Chairperson Axdahl gave a presentation and various commissioners commented. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission interview the applicants in the order listed on the applicants map. Commissioner Sigmundik seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The Planning Commission interviewed the candidates present at the meeting and voted as follows: Leko Lund Larson Allenspach Hendrickson Rasing Kol2esky Hughes Anitzberger 1 2 3 Axdahl 2 1 3 Fischer 1 3 2 Frost 1 3 2 Gerke 1 2 3 Martin 1 3 2 Pearson 3 1 2 Rossbach 1 2 3 S igm' and ik 2 3 1 Sinn 1 2 3 TOTALS: i. Kopesky - 16 points 20. Hug - 16 points 3. Allenspach - 12 points Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission direct staff to ask the top three applicants to attend the City Council meeting to be interviewed by the Council. Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn The motion passed. 80 F PRESENTATIONS a. Since t ext regularly scheduled Planning Commission falls on a holiday, the n meeti was rescheduled to February 18. b. Staff discusse ith the 'ssioners upcoming planning workshops. 9. ADJO M,P� ing adjourned at 10:35 p . m. AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT Aotion bv, Couneil:. TO: City Manager ftdorse' Modifie FROM: Finance Director ReJ ecte Date RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIM DATE: March 13, 1992 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACC O�S PAYABLE: $ 359,328.52 Checks # 25401 thru # 25464 Dated 3 -2 -92 thru 3 -11 -92 $ 72.463.09 Checks # 16542 thru # 16655 Dated 3/23/92 $ 431,791.61 Total per attached voucher /check register PAYROLL: $ 195 Payroll Checks # 25627 thru # 25779 dated 3 -13 -92 $ 39 Payroll Deduction checks # 25784 thru # 25800 dated 3 -13 -92 $ 235 Total Payroll 6 67,152.44 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. lz Attachments MNANCE/APPRCLMS.AGN ..t I.. A-:7 -•�- -'-- `-- -_�:..:_. _�^^= =t"'.+ ,.-..... K' �___ � __.�.�...:,�IL__.- . -"". . �. �. TM_...._ I ��^«•.•• �^^".= mw°. �^ m4^_ � �_ � '.. t?. Raet:* � a ^ nc^ Mm' e*. r8�. c�' w. tTM» wnv.... T M . .,� � °"i " . y :- .,,..rm r.». . ..nrr; xx_s 03 L r 17 ( z F O R. P E. R a r 1 -� VOUCHER/ _ 1� 4 CHECK V #: N D O k C H C. V-: VEND :l I' c:. 11 ------ - ----- I N UMBER N t�MitER D A T E NA � •` R T F`•f TC: :}t N Cl A M NT AMOUNT i 6) -� ,'' 341706 _---- 0 3/ O Z/9Z . .-- ....._ . _. __ ... _.._....... _. _ . _ ._ ..._...._.... _.._..._ (.� �.. f A � '{� 141 i .... _ f (�. �1 � - i J'�l Mi �:. i,� /�. 1 Y t�' _._ ..... ........._....... _.... _... _ ..... . . F 1 �:° �. E : * , _ . , . .�� ... �� .� ,... _ _......._ t '�' �•., ... ... -..... _ . - .,.,., .._ . ,... .. _ _... ..... _. _- ..... ,......- ---. •-• - _ � I � F '' r i1 A C T A X , I+"�/a Y f " E �'` •.+ /.. {.e � s 2 4.. q { ill `N 1 _• tF pf tJ .i r r it `� j ^ r ('' j^ t 1.s � [� �« � li �.+ I .! F � Er � ..i .�• .f : t 4 (� •.:1 �. n t «� t„! 35. • t4' 1., 16 25404 8909 k i i 9 ,». U . ,� a �l E , T CO C'�1 h� t� � Z � � T 3: �:� 1`� S T c:" i� H E=' k f �: hd F (( _ _ _...__ ..,..... ......_.. _ ._ .. "f LLEP E , , .. > =1 zl TELEPH( _Ni: , 1 TELEP11 -IG is 4 a 1 5 I`�3 ,. 7 E L E F H ID � -4 f: : �# . 14 IJtJ� 2.y i -1 y i - _., .T E L E 1 ] { 0 N `• 41, N 1 ,✓ x.3.51 Z i T E L E F' H N E 48.29 I~ T ELEH ! NE _! t., TE :::::.. ...r :_._. TELE1= '�t� °i a �;, �� `'� TELEPHONf; 54. 65 — 4V TELEPH13NE 5 4 6. " 33 TE LE P HONE: TELE HONE: 9 TELEPHUNE •.. w M. J 3', L T ELEF'Ht_!Nt: • 54 . 65 46 I TELEPII-lf.-INE 29 .62 481, t^ r r fit, �a ^�• i :: • 3L . f E L. E t !.� d 2 w f( o� :3�J� � NE TELE ._.. ._._ ...___ _.... - :__._...... .90 40 TEl —EF' -' 67 a 4. (:! 4, "I" E. L. E F' H 0 N F 7 15 . 5 8 Q� Pi N 49 1 ELEF' ..._ C 4 { T EL E P H i3Nh 4 6- - 94 LE P f •i C. I N c• «• t i.. �.J r 0 7 I . 17I T L E F' H O NE �.t 0 7 •r ,�, :�, • ,_, h,; I 4.i 4 IIiO! �.. •_i t �.� 540800 03/OZ/92 MINN. DEPT l� F HEALTH . � I'� Jai �� I � +: �� � � � �i �. � �7 90.00 90.( 5 1. 4254t! Z 00 8 00 �. 0•, / 9 F 77 OF P R(W E R TY (' ,, X �r �Y j••. f- R SE F EE 4J vJ .. • to • . •. 2 1 N ',J 52 5 3 I, 25407 d, r »• 1 {';,, - ( «I 0 .« 9 r N f-: r .. . F . r ; !. ! R R i V I �" w .. a ,�... ...�:. a iby I � I II 10 15 ( ��!•:•�. 4 0 f ( R E yr. 1y Gt !r 2 54tr9 5 03/o z/9 0 Z a MINN. SfA T Rt A N ! v t� � 1i c IA F� L.:. \7 S.• .t 1 .!f OF MA P1 r. - FOR PE17"10D 16 '21 �.j vIOUCHEhf I ' =l - - -_._ 1 - - -- . _- _. C H F C f•' V F. 1) C1 f•_: C H L E.: K ......... VE NDO R . I ..� E: F�# ` .; �1- ,� .t r is i t _ �•• f-.' � H ti.. t.• . , ! L 1'dUMBFR NUMBER DATA NAME 1)►:.�3t: h IP i - 1 :t f��I �,�,� 1�- 0i 'r' t AM MO 2 4 10 2 1 / 0 tt . I 0 2 t:. r ' `► i \ « I + 1 A .''1 • f D I 1 F r OF �- R �. {! 1. (� r r 4� {� { ION � L t ... r . r E. E s F � � R s E: R � I �: E •� f.. �. r 6 �� _ i 5 `i ' 6 1 -! 1 1 i �� w l I!Ili . f. 5 41 1 : f l�# t•'} L••' i } t�} t.. « > > 03 » ....._.. t � . — _ 1 1 r •,- 'l� I R +,. - ..- � F - -..:F _R 0 P �.. R T Y T A X A.. �.._1. �-j._ . ._._.. , � �, �� - - - �`�-E F _- I R ' E -- - - . E ZI z 1 6. 5 I +!a� t:. j • y ( "} :., t: r� �'• A ;:. {:: O r M:S S .i ;« 1'J (:. T-i 1 ; �.. .; i ! t A . •'. F it 9 1 1 9 7 ;�', 5 .: f ! ! ldf 11''I I i 2 ". 5 4 13 .«'4 7 06 0 « HER BANK WIAGr DEDUCTION 4 ?3 � i�; 0 437 .50 :E S C ON f REVENUE, - f is -S If A { 4 -5`15 �::417 if, ti 0::'ic : } Zi'92 Irk N N E S 0 T A BENf.H.FTT A S1 S 1)CIA1"1 N MBA INS PAY i} 50 } J 25416 0 5 0 0 033 0 3 J 9 ,:: G R t. J 1.1 >:' H E. r L i 1••1 I NC ,, H , 1. , 1} 1N 1. F1, A N C U i i � r • ~• :� � 1, 7 _ _ . _ _ E - C 3 .� FA '' t.} 4 { A/R INS C ON 1 7 • �► :; ��} 100 0 : I t Y � 19 :: ►y1 � la I C: A CHOICE i-I > �.. j 1.� INSURANCE � '� � ��1 4 'v w 5 H { •� E' A DED PAY _ -... � i .. E1) F'A, 1 ' H 1 INS }.•k __ .. •� • •Ji F � � w • _ .... ... ......... } i.i . I jzGi A/R INS 25418 w 5 1 1 0 0 0 ; 0 :. `a 2 IM MWIMAL LIFE I hl S U E~t A Cat !: F H Y F .. s D T A . C�� �; . F� I`► C E _ - - ��. - -' , ` , ( } - . 1 J i} 'y l 1 H l• 1'1 A D E. D PA Y •.Jl .! `1' a i:. 6 i U I �,,� , . 1\ t i I.! A / R INS CON g , q gg 6 : I - - -~-' 5 - -' - .,.�.. 1 8 't ___ i' d E. }_' w _ _ 1! n Le M A - 1 N t« "— i J+: �: + 1 i .l � ! 1 a ( [ ` V I C H; . _ ` . 10 �.� s.. w 3`.; t''y 4 ; U .l �• !,J {: 1. i.� C} f �i {:� •.1 ( C} :J ! 9 � 1'1 A } %J H N A �� :[ �:.� 1W !� L . _i a ! • I NSURAN CE . " . { 1 j • ,} 4 j _ 361 _ 14 9 .« 1 4 a 9 F5 1 s� 2 �:;:: 4 -' y .1 r { 9 ` —_K E . !». Y T E: F A Ft' a 1 °; ., • R _. ... t: tit 1 RV _.__.. __....__ _.. _.._ _ _ _ _. _ r• f 4 9 ._. _ . ...__ _ -._.._._.._ ....__..__.___.�.___._.......__ _ '' � � • 'i ! r I'1 { I t:". 54 t•. ..+ h 5 � } 65 0 03 M N D L. 1� F . �'1 1« � 1.i i.. �4 �• 1 3'. k f i.. « •.... w 1-1 �' r M. .. J.. (/ q P A i•7• I T Y 0 F r • - . • V� { ` 7 ' ;► ` �'j • R j��° _ " ` ' ` 1 . '._ u .� ,( .. tif f w hh hh�� .. l l� w' .J A ( Er C LICENSE " 54 Z6 5 "'1' 1 4 0 0 0: ..r ! 9 /i. 11 . 1 t N 1 '1 f . J t A T E. T 1 !.. A S L1 R i.. R L. 1 (. E: N l! E: 9 1 1J 8 � � 1 r . •.r , f� 8 � � •� s� J. v 1 `• %� ' '5r "1 " •7 - ,. 6.i'100tii�� �_�.- � 4/9C .:� �:� ' '�,) !. R � �, R w'.r. t o A :~ 1' A E E ,± h T F` I.1.: � 1�� «R. `r , .J h V I C E -r 1' i '° 4 7 p 0 (.. ': 2e, 3 4 t:: 'f 4 0 0 C� ::; �:� r` 4/ ;�, �; MIN N11 S T A J E:. T h E: . U k U� ' E.. I �.E� 1 1'j' 1 E 7 � 1 R �:} , '�i ►:. 5 M f •. 0 r 4 1 4 0 0 4) t•} 4 M STATE • 1 F( E A S L t R {.. R L. I t.• r.: N 1.1 E � �.y I +•� t 1 o 2.70 � � � t:. 5 4 1 7 1 0 ."ti / 0 4 / 9 ;, •• R A M S Y E. � 1.1 1 y "1 Y 1 -.* r F OR R +S !.3 f i � .: .i 1 1.. t ••�• _ _ .. r Vii. .40 T v _...._ . •• 13 I J ti T �' •ti T � : r "� 1 1" r � F.. !: i�t « ia II VOL) CH RE G C .1 1 Y C1 F M A F L E.-"!4 P A C. 0 -3 1 .-JUCHER/ CHIE. of 1/p FOR P Er. R'10D 16 Vl-.ItJCFIER/ C HE CK N U 01 R VENDOR. NUM C H I-.. DA T V E N.".) C. R' NAME T A T EM Dt ES CR I P T I N t "1'11 m MOUNT C WEE C K AMOUNT 1h 2 5 4:-:'. 3 5 4 1 400 03J05/92 MINN. STATE TREASURL'R L. I C V. N S 1*.-' 9 1 4. J` 7 ..5 4 9 .54 25434 541400 03/05/92 MININ. STATE TREASUR.E. R L. I C', NS E t 951 00 9 5 0 0, I 1 131 I' 3 `5 45 1:1 1 .10 O�"- /05/li:;2 D L P OF NAILlf AL ►RESOLIRSI:S D N 1. 1 ► C E 14 S 8 f") 0 98.00 11 4i 2'5 4 3 6 190400 03/05/92 DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURSES ))NR TI TLE-S 29:.o 0 -- - -- 90 4.:- 541400 03/06/92 M T A NN. STATE TUASURE:R MOTOR VEH LIC. 5 177.00 5 9 _777 .00 17! 5 4 3 8 541400 03/06/92 Ill NN STATE TREASUIRER DRIVERS LICa '718.00 718.00 .2.554 -3'9 7101.00 03/06/92 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CONTRACI PYM4 - - -- 6 .6 5 4 4 0 540800 - - - - 03/06/92 lyl I NN DEPT OF WEALTH TRAVEL TRAINING . ..... J 00 00 100.00 1 �31 4.5441 5 5 0 4 2 5 03/06/92 M T J D A R 1: 0 F- A NI* ASSN, M i I T-11 I..-- R s 14 1 P 50.00 50.00 2! 25442 843200 03/09/92 S`Er'-EN, SCLITT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 351 . 01 0 .3 34! PROGRAM SUPPt. ES 3r-- 00 70,00 F-1 4 4 3 081150 03/Q9/92 V-101-11. J1.9-H14 35.00 ,. _ ...... ..W...., .r.. _.. ..._...__. -�. _.....�';l PRO G R A M S 1.1 P PI., I E S 0 0 70.00 13), I 'r1I 251 4 4 4 061000 03/09/92 BANICK, J 13 14 N PROGRAM SUPPI-11"HS -- - f4 "' r )o 41 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 70.00 ! -5445 91 T o 5 ' 5 { }'_' /t)'. - Z V E. N E T I A N P'L A Y H 0, U E IF E E S F1-J R E R V It, 100.00 10 0 . (.'Jl 544 -"6 5 1 6 5 0 0 '0 9 2 M E **[R* f J W A S T E C 0 N R C1 L C 0 11 M N S P. -1F TR&ATMEN" 1 15 1 1 1 .00 161 .00 47 25447 661fr50 03/09/92 Nf--1 R T I-I E R N STATES Pi".1WER U T I L I TI ES 151 20 50i 511 UTILITIES 12. F-5 0 2 52 U T I L I T I ES 6 6 3 7 LYFILIT 1(:S 11t'),76 54! 5,5! UTILITIi:-S 204 5(;! UTITIES 57 UT1 e-'87 .79 u , r , 1. L 1. T I E: S. 128.16 �r.1r U T I L I T I E-. S . .. . ... ... 13 6 (YT - ��•, 17! LJ"r Ir L I T I E.- 1 0 4 1V ( s3 U T I L I T 1 -------- -------- 16 LITILIT A 1[- 96.69 10 U T1 L I T I ii-". S 14.98 LIT I L I T I S 8.18 UT 4 6. icm (-ILI-11 Us J. 0 71 25448 541400 03/09/92 1 I h! N f, STATE 'fRiEASURER L I C E. N E 8 JS 0 0 _ .. _. _ .... 55 18 7 -d - '�� 1 -/ 4154 4 541400 0:.---' 0 9 M I N11 SIATE TRI'ASLIF-4ER. .. . .... ...... ...... 9 . . ....... ........ .... 9.2 6 6 V-3 , r-j VOUCHREG C:I T 0 rrt AF' Wi'tC.,}; - 03 r 1:1 / 9 Z 11 • 17 V 0 1 iC:11€:. r { H,. S T ... __.._..._.._ _ . _. _._ - ..... _ _... .._.. _ ....... ... ... _ ... .._ _. .., 2 I V iJ U C H k: R � X1 1 a t: €; C :. V € N D ►:+ C H E: r: If V F N t :1 !�� I : i�l :t €: i�! - - - i J NUM BER h DATE F KI AME DES CRIPTIO N AM - j:+tJ N. 1 AMOUNT , �, y1 F 1 1 ( " fy • rr j r" p {' r �} f '' t E-3 t `r f : r o M 5 4 5 .0 1 1 1 0 it •.J 1' 0 1 / t li• D . M A. 1 , , *� [ ,�tF •... }7- 777 {�• �y.• . y,(,, r 1 j C •✓ 1 1 "� .� }� i.• C •� �'1 � �•.� 1 ; � .� i•• `•• »� 1 � � •.:;t L{ • � R.• .�...I� i • 1 � w f {1 -0 Z 5 4 � 1 8 `a Q (8 0 ' / 1 � i f 9 . R + G I €:+ N 1 i� ; P €:+ r.. �: � 1~ €� �' A � �:; U � I' h A �t i� L � ; r" € _. A 11' 11: #� +a t "� t�r _., ; t � j � j� SS rr lU �13 J t' 4 4 5 :: 6 . 0 .1- I �. �.� ; ' + ; N 1� ; , "t f F. R " - , 4 1 "f A T t:: � F" I,� !� €:: � !.t ri :� €.. r �' qi 5 5 t 31 UTILIT IES 16 f1 t' +I U T I L I f I iE ;.; 6' U t I L .L F I E N f A ll u - r r. L r T I 15 :. �lu !J T I L 1 6 UTIL E.1 I 1 T €; �, i u T I L l ; }: + 1 36 . 4' , - ) , E. S .. -,. .m...••.... _ ..... 7-- 2 _ 1.1T1. � 1 i Sri 2 5 5 0 -1 25 0 %) 1 0/ 942 M :lNI "J D A ff E: 0E=F I C, ERS AS 1 7'RAV €:1. a: TR NINt:� _ f ". 01 4 0 0 ��_ I' J F 4 5 4 310 ti: 10 9 .':. M R c R t� - " } tai - I _ i`; . N T T . I l'd J: t�! G ,.� �� >'� _ ., �t' _ - _ • to _ , _ _.. _ ____... _- .. - -- - - - -- -` -�- ._ _.. - -- - - - - - -- ! M �� ! : L. b A r 1. N r:1 t�a „ : a t -a , C . ca ,•toj ISt •,1 ,J2 25455 1 t3C) 110 0=j �' 10�'`� D. C . A. i�;i �`�t C= �:�;�3 R. AC 1 l_!A€. � €: i�;v� 1 , ;4 pi �'•a "'� I .i ti • q � I•j'J 2 5456 9 � t _a 3 I 1 0 2 LINDA :° J: C F °. F' f'ti't.t G H H IYE '., €J P €"' L. !. E. __..`, _ wM` � J am.._...___........____ _ __. _..____-_.-- -- •- _.- ___.- _- __.._._.- __ - -. - -- _ _ ..�(� F' 0 S T A Ci E: r, I TRAVEL. TRAININC; �4u1 P ':;1!i= '1='t_ :' ;:; r, g 7'to � } 411 1 T 1't A Y E. L & t R A I N I N t.'+ • 4 75 I ri I i tt q 11Ji . . 1: I � A N N C' 7 00 P R i_14 R A M ':i t P P L i. '.. S 2 0 r t o r • . S ( _ q �� 3J F P L. J. a }.• .►. t � �.• i.•. ;. C E a t� � �� p �'. rid 154 M 12 1` t1 (]' 5 41 � .0 a •� � r� I � +' � f •:� � 1 1 : 1 .� ' ' i. �• /� '.� /.• t ' .� 1� �1 ST • i ' � `� � M ` k t. T r t-. . (.► [. R .. .• . • • •.. E. � r r L r� _ _ J =; •. �I 1 � � 1 '� � +' r 1 Mi � ' � � I 5 8 55 4 1 0 0 � w . -1. t-a " 1 1 MINN 1 H T E 1 R E. A � � 11 i' (ER L. I C ;:: N S F ; : t ! � „ �:t 0 ", , 5: Q ;,ti I ,;,'. !• «I ? 5 i T 1 0 .1 '"1 � 0 •:? !'' 1 1 � ',+ 1••. E. L.. L. 7 1 F. i'1 f' +.t! � r r^ E R V ~ S A P•: �' .� � .t t.• �...� , «., �.. f l: �: �� F �.1 F; S E: RV .l C l•: i. 8 1 ti x 0 184.00 � •ll { ` i I�� t I ._ V I" : :. rt : ; • ~~: T 1" ' t�; }= X11 > ' 1. E. k:1 �� ► i s i:� 1~' A G E F:, _ 1 1 t Q .., r 1 1 / �+ �:. i. �.: 17' r•. r•, V 0 1.1 '1 »• 1-1 k: R ' (' f r• H c. R, U R 1 . �� 10 D 16 � , I V C LJ C 1-1F F r' I AA C H E. t: F°• v 1::_ ND 13 R tC: HE' t.: K V 1:. � .�:� I: � Ft I 'T Ell f T t; M f:. 1-1 �: 4:: �:: , f; • 141 U ty'i 13 r R N Cpl i3 :.1~, l� A ' E M A M E i:� E! t.: h I P T I: �:I tt :, } Ai"is! N AMOUN r j i I _ r.:I�t 0 54 i�i5 9 ��1�'rE, t .. _ �l.1l 1 ( 91:. t . _.... t� - y _ •� ..... �'4,( �j w •�' 1 _ + .. � _ • _ f� __ . t E S V i•'1J.!ti+E J'7 I i RI C A A TfI�: ^fi j.• j tt l.•7,f iJ•.�_`� -- 0 _ . ` L - . f ... [�' .__ . . � _ „) ._ . _ . y �• ���} . ti ?1� ' / • -�� r ���.+ - `�' _ E` (� tl I 1?_ ! 25461 6 6r1 ! 5o 03! 1 1 /92 Ni) R 1 HRN a 1 A TES Pf_QWER J F I L I `~ b-: S � 42 V. U ' 1 A L I T i [: 2 UTI:LITIES � n •t �1rfl I t J � , i UTILITIES - ------ « t UTTLI T IF.E 2 , n _ U t 1 L I T I E S" 91.47 �GI _. _.. __ ... ........... ..... .. ................... .. ...:. . ... _.. .......... . ........... _ _ . _ 1.1 T I L T v . A � t i I,r(' .. ___ _..__ .. _._.. - -- - - - -- - ._.... __ . _ ... .. "�M11 {37 � 1.. 5 .7 6 2 ( + a.� 1 `� 46- t /t 0 3 , 1 1 I � 2 y T A T :�: 1 ( t.-+,• y , E' iw �w �. i H �.I �;, E ..� r 1.. . 6 n 6 t! I '3 (,) PERSONAL 1-1 ; _ j h TEt.::F' .IFS 2 . »� 3, 9 - I. :331 �! t 2 5 463 1x+ 4 1 4 00 �a :�. I 11 �9 �.. M .. 1_J MI NN. ST ATE TREA t f•. .J 1.. I N"'E `" �f r- :��`, 8 8 � 1. 3 _ . _ ..... W .... ._ ..... �_�......v............ __._� YJ i ;�, 5 4 6 4 r 4 ; 4 0 0 0 ! 1 1 � `:4 , M I �i N . E T A s F:. _,.. l ;' E. A U R' � R L. I f.'. E:. l,! S 1. 6 ti 16,.... 0 ��....._.w__Y 6 8 6 . �} t�__ +3r: 138' I 654Z 010460 0 2 1 " • i I 1 6 54 3 54 3 0 10 5 7 . 5 0::i i' Z3 9:: A C t:. H AR D WAR E � { "`�. � �i:.�" .� 1 �.���.�A. 4C; , 2 21 11.1 .. 1� P F1 ., S 1.i P P L l E. S 1 .1 1 f 1. • 0 9 65; • 9 1 146 III 1 6 - 544 0 `>' 03/ 1'ti r J 3. �I 1'� /'t< 1 INC. (' t �:i �� �'� •i � I , FEES. FOR S E� R V :F is F: - - - -- - __._.__ - - -_ __.___ . - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - _ 2 � _ _ --- ....._.. .__.____ __ -•--a I F E E S R S E R V I C E 15.49 FEES FOR. SERVICE ... ; ) , Ili 1 iI .99.86 j si 1541 r . i . _ t'1 � r .....,,::•.� ... ....... t ?::� d, . f . " � .!1 Y E t I C k �': � ,-� 'f � : E: 1€' A � '�' ° I r. i , Its ,; rl i`� i� �-1~•, I+� A .� i�J i � , . •:1 Sri , ;: � � y 9 1 65 4 6 0w �_�r.= F 1 2 0 3 / 23 / 92 ANDRf. Y`l.:� COE.. E..y:: `::1�$ s EE / l�! � jf �+�•• P.�». � Et l I141I _ 1 1 . 6 R __ c 3 I: .J 1 1» P. :•_J 1 00. 1 0 0 �T0 11 t ;t t. r r 1. 5 4 7 ) ' t l t c r 1 . � c j t .� 3 , r . 4: _ rr 1:_ _= r .::: . i � f• 1 . � .,. !.. A AN 1•� � . �. �� ��.f �• ►: r� F:1'�� � :>; �.1 � � :: �• � �: r..� ,.. • � 1... r f: i _ �'' I 1 !'I' `� � r,•� , r_• ::� �.� a::� c:1�,.:i �►• �. :; .�, r� �.• � t:, r� r -� ti, is ., r tit �; � -, ( , , �. 55.00 t<il 1 i "J 31 10 0 0 3 9 c:. APFE.ARANCE PLUS RL MAINT Vr:1'► 08 0 _ REPAIR MAINT 1. 14' r.1)0 r j (. t REPAIR I. 1 3 V � - ' 0 0 t .. i r�, .�� to 4 .:.r .1 • •_} ,.1 �' ... � , , . 2 A . 4 , .. •. J A L T 0 : i� r� V 1: t E. .. ...... ; t �:: E �s r h fu1 �� S 14i � E ! 7 _ ... -. ! ......- .. _. _ ......._ _ . _._ � - _ .. __._- ...... ...... f,R _._ F 701 ,`•�, 1 65 5 0 ���+1 J .�i t��tf C :. +!'�! .. lbh i J�r.i.L L. J.1Yf : +l.1� �i I r� J NC i, n P d ri + C i. �� - 0 0 :: � RA V R , y 1 I ti 4 � .._,�.... t_: . _ - i_t - a .. ..,., �l = .+� -' _ -. P _ -. -IL . __�_.';'_".. .. � .,..,.�.., «- . ,. ,.••. ^io- •• =... r ..,., ,.._ . e, .w - r,- wn ,�.r.,,.- - - �`_... _.. i'> rrr_- ...:•M, � . . .. =Mr+c�•n:wn ., �;: ,_ ,,... *;trt axon^, Q -• r., c- pk .... ,i -. ,. •,�- , +:._��a:..�w�, _. t j .I V i U Ci H R E 6 ' t.; {:: i i= I" I A F' l.. ;:: i- i t:, t. i U tw` i L,� 0 :; • t:. .. 1 1 : 17 _ _... _.._... _.... _ _ ......... _ . � i I t: I -, ; � • H � ; ` 1= t `� ' � -• .. _ 3 V i.I Ll Cr 1 -1 F: R/ f C HEC:i• -:' VE NDCM C:HE:.t:E:: VEN T) I::tR IT E.M C H r - - C N A M I • t U N fi A m Lt U N . 'I VEHIC At. t. 0WAN 50 8 6 4 w 4,:. 9 1 6552 6 110 (11i BOOKS 47 0 24•:-; 0 3i 1 655. -. i 7 �J {� _ - 9, -1 C . r•. 1� I R I A hH�, .I C'1 A s t F lit fi , ) _ i H s; i� S R `= 93 + .? 1` 4 t. 11:, 16 5 I 4 1 1) 1 0 1 90 0 0 L U G I N E S S # R E i R D S C I.I R F! M �` ....- --- I. 16 555 11 0 .3/9' CAI.. CC) ICI!`' R F PA iR' M "I I. - 'i) 0 ! 1 1 10 ` t C , ' .. f 2 C A P ITO L R U B B E F, : "! i' A M P C OMPANY F f. I: S FO S ► R V I C E 13 7 3 7 7 12`J� 0 35 "'; �' ``' 1 1 �:. {_y c.)..,�' /;,.: .. TR ACK INC. 't R .; T 7';:, p 7 _= "5 0 a •. •a. 1. 1 � 70 03/+..a,�. Z C�A RLE:, JEAleiE:. (T VEH CLE:. ALL ] �`. i 1 ;� .7'j" . ..... �' 27 1 6 +4«+6 0 I Z0 ,� 0 . �, i0 r �►.. E CEL LULA R t «I!'i I 'j I 3N TELEPH 4 . 12 - - __ -- •-- _._..._ __._...___.._ _ -{ r: 11 1 6 5 61 IZO '"+ Z3J "M3 9 ; CENTER I 1 f , .. HE AL T H ,.3 h' a EV ` - — �'' FEES FO U R V T C:E: E E S V ': C:: E {�) { �35 J.6 �� �. , r. } { f s. �+ { 1/ 1f •.! ! » ! r i } i :. r C• G. l i l.! ' = 1 T �: S U P C-' !. r .. I 3 ; :, r- :=; L ..� t °) '? -} �i 1 4_ Z�.,, C)' : fr `�; ' . ,. / Z�.. /, Z CLEA e ' _ ., ST R UG S w" � . _ . .. �_ ._. .. _ . .. t E �-• S ERVIC E _.. __ ..... _......... _ . _ .... •f, c .. .� 9 n �� _ ................_...... .............._ _.._.... _.._... -.. -,, , - ...+ w �.) _ . {:►y, 11 I:3i!� I:,iJj i I I' � 1 r , t ryt � � •� •� » � .l �.i {.} .t � � 0 3 / Z. ' .r• � � «.� f ' � 1 ... ( - p '� ff a CAL. - lr 1�9 � I.. b �V � E. � b. � ♦ T `'l � 1.• /� 1.« C r I i I� � T w _ RE ,r{ /� N (yy P �� � : F � !. � �'t P1 �. 1'4 � �:. � l I 1. T p �� i.. "l' �i .41 a{ i ti:. `Y � p ' -1 I• 1 ; I1 1 1 r 5 0 9 0 0 0 �; *711 r° 9 2 C: I_t M fY3 i �; S 1 O N .. k OF t F'. A N "1 P t_ WE W11. N R P 1 ": M! jk 1 tai f/ .j € I, 4 2 6 _. _. r. _..... 1 . 4 ... 45! f :its 1 . 1 r'� 0;3 l 23 / ' fi: D U PL ICA TING F' '.1D. C OPY DUPL ICATING ,. •.. , ° .9.2 i ` _ 1700'0 '0 t ../..••,.,/, 2 ' C'LiMI� DE R E: 1:LIN1� f - "' R E. � "'. 1 •1c {I 1 63 1 II I y] T O I j F 7 3 .... l:,11 U F' F' L- :k E-'- So — ..t A N :� 7 0 h 1 �: c.) 1 i � . r: � :16570 180900 {) 2 1' x , PAT s f A ., I Pvtm _ n is s i `!•I1 1 65 7 , j ... f�' 1 8 0 0 ( f • , 4 � f� k r J J -k 1 7. .- 0 :'� /2 i . •J / 1.. + .L! A V ! rZ. »- 1 l °. L. R (. o L. I •' 1 N ' SM A LL . Y 1 ( } ._._._.......- ---- -- .........._....._.....__ - - -_ _..._...- _..._._._........ y • r .. . 77 �; . +,, w 1 i i ' i 1. VOUC:HF'E'~(; F _ _ F' A r- 7 (�. 11 � { t } / 1 31 / -f ::. ! t It 1 c, L it H F:' P C' E;1 t:7 S ` ..{ i i 71� M ' i 1 V 0 t t l l'-i E: C/ H E C: t': V E: N D 0 R (.`H F F VEND T T [.1111 t �. t 1� C H E C t:: HUCflj?rR NUM ER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 11M1fl N AMOUNT e)I 1 6 5 7 3 J 2•: 0•_ 23/ 9t Et�! SIDE. 4.•1�iR ( �t.fPPL I E. S VL. H. LE 2 . 1 � ..i 1 t.::. +9 I „ f .» .. .. �' lit .. �'' .. . 11`01` • f r- 1 t 2 .-t 1 6. 51 {} 0 3 2. 2 - -A I. Cr r S0 �A t t' C?' ,� t } r.} d ~�' a H ' ; r..: r� H F �- �I �.. �;�: SUPPLIES _ :. gat t.! � � �: t`� _':..... .. .... ._ _ _ _ ..._. _ _.. _..- - -- - __.. - - _ .. _ _. _- �. .: , .. r} � 1. t } , t.} ..... I P :: } t "} _._...__. ::7t:} 110 03 I ,:. 3 2 FLAH F: IE' t{lP C0F.FC)RAT 10N RC"'R MA T NTdEi T r t'1t ") 172 0 1 I {; 1 6576 0 I t1 t d r::s I ' ;' F ra ! k :, Y E : 4; t.. A !'1 F` ; 6 C:. C-4' �' F' F �:t t r' A SUPPLIES . i ' ,.� !9 j I, PROGRAM �`UF'F'LIES :9.00 244 w00 i 23 _........._ .. 1 'x' 804 1.;0 03/23/9 F L� S � DI Ct'•: R E:.E:t.1ICI D "' P R ilG R l' F E.�: �. i.. � 0t { 2_ w t «� 25 I r \r` 4� 1. a... •I ti E R` _ _ f I I 16 5 78 29it 1 0 0 0 3�' � [l � � A 1 .. D U -t�!" _ - .�,� R ? , : - - � tR F I � ... -.. - __4_...._ _ 1291 `� //'- p h t tit / q -� 30 -t 92 . �, SERVIC U }+►nF' 1 , 1 'R #'1{J '� Ct.�t�HINi'. lr•�.t:�! 31 1 6 5 � ''+ 0 i •} r`.• Cat) 0 : f 3 d yy r' t �} ^ . r� �. � , • 1 U N r F ►. L O -, 3� .: Cr r � . r. r� � �{ t:� UNI FORM S C• L t.l "s } { t +J �: 1 33 ! I ,.. ,.:, .ti. i34 UNIFORMS ti: CLol t4� » -1 r i> I r { t( i l.i CLt:! Ht: `29 n1 �aJi 341 .. 't r ( .3 _ .... ,... :t c:} i � / .:.- 2 GENUINE PARTS ':t �I t�' A t�! Y SUPP LIES V != � 1.. E _ _ '� I -' t� F' F' L. .i:, t VEHICL - -- - - " - - 41 •2 MA r�TEfitANCF.: 140 „'.?Cr 4'i ,i ClE'N TNC k - , 1 �, 5 81 •' t} ' '� �� c1 c.} r �' '�� , . � ►.� t.t �J � �.. �I t� t.� � F E.. E. �1 F .1 F<`. � f. Ft V .t t1 E.. 4 7 . :. 4 7 . 5 _. ,� 47 « TI i r �' i " t 16,._i82 31. : t_3 f2:-td : U AR TIFF C0MFAN`r F.t='R MA �� T.iii T .1UF:t- ..Ew t�_7 ,;,,� ... R P F M A; .� !q! t d V E. H :E t. E. �` �, r --- f a �� R P R :ti MA j N T / V h f i 1 C L ...+ ad i.. w �:� a w 1 �„} 1 I i gill _. ,III 1.658:3 'I t:} r r, 1. r;} d =.� ' =� H � : ri: A R T t: r �" s : L. U F' F !:t C; A `�! FL E: f :k ! C' A �i f !:t �+I 7 . _� ;:r 7 . '.i r i I 1 _i8 : 1 tit:} t:} _ / / I t:i � R � _,9� ,_�;�, 5 51 t� � .. �: t-t �..! ��C: t-1 7 l�l' . �� A ANN F+ i "� E ' - t t~' F` �..: F :3 A� , VC:HTC:L.E At.L014ANCk: � �� ���� 57 . l ,: 4.t, 4 , •1f �,a� / ,�.yj ff j�`' 1 _ Fi _ «� { �� j (`_. 1 `y (�j ( [� / I' I ... .. .._ 16 ..... - .... L t': t.} :t, 0t-} ...... 0 3/23/9 2 •'/ 24"'/ .'.... .. .. IN DEP ENDE NT SLJ 1lFes' lD .1.! M .....: ' ti .. ..... ....RO 1f . {1 . f I,.M ..�l ����, �'•.. � l..�. - �{ � } 7 {� ...... _ .. t.l t J. 6 i �i , t04 \ t , :f / i . .l ! 9 r K E L. L E. R �. t_. k �`• T R .1 "' C• � �� t. t rt _ i 6 2 i R EPAIR riA t•'� i. - � 1 yt i 1 _ 1 � k'7 w .t '� L ., X S �) 611 _ 16 4 16 f' 410440 0 '« �' 9 KELL TEMPORARY IY �O lid.R SERVICE f .l 1' 97'7 7 � ►::::.� d , t•.. Y 1 t~ Ff � � E::I "� '� :t E:: E: •.� F E: E': t,:i FOR �;� ' , � ;Fs i�( ;y jy ' r• -, } r { -• r ~• ( T, - ( r. . _ .. .._. ..._.._.._.._._.. __....___ _..._....._... I oa ♦',',t . i e.: t.} { i ti: i •( . »t rr i.. • �I ! '.'� C« k �{ .+ tr'4 �... 1'� 1 �•�. ,.l I R ; �. }'� 1 t l ,.l •.1 S t �.. 1. + . f ! 2 :.' n i .....�f q i {� 1 /� y'� ( ` r ( T ' 1 t L l� �-( A i S l.1 i t 7 �. 1 L: :1 5 . , 5 �! RCIC 7" 73+ ! 16 _r 189 t;t: 9 =' � } !fit ( ) 1} 4y }/4 � +y f{ i �{{ j t t. { J 1 : "` l - •. .� .� t �: i i.t , .i Y {? \Jt 4 «.t :.t r l J o I � 1 � 't �:j �. } � ,:_ {'.! _ � 1. .J { i. T A � 4 1 i i;..i tie I 7 f; I, ( ( ( CITY s F x xGE 8 � f � i. - ll l ( V { OUCHREG 1 1 C ` ; •, ... J+ r r•. r__ r • '� ..• 4 C F 0 R P P is 13 !. ��� D J f+ I I I w ( (:: HE �::1' V V E: N D C1 > >;:: H ;:: ,. t•: V V END �:; r� : :l - t t� fYi : : c f is ;�! C C H"' C K r J J NUMBER N N tJ 11 l;�:k D DA � E N N 1 1y� { ::R IPT 1: t tif''i�:S A AM m_.,...,- .»�_�1--=- "'. =:k_ �_I•_•.*�.e!- .^•^_- ��:.Q.��� . � - _ �._.. -.__ ___ �._I __.��I:L__... i- _ _- I___:_____._....�_C__..___ -i i:. �1_ ; +_L «..r.„.,..._rN. -Y� ,rw..�- , x�,�,,...... ;•«4... .M.y,. +p..m..ru. -• Fww:�. +. - ww ;srn. e .. r•; n -m«wss. ..ry _ .m:*,e,., ,.. ...._., r- .,.- .- ....., •,m, ,,.. ,,.. .o;, _ ..m.�le,»,°°^.••. _ ,, ,�r�.rr..,x........ .�ecx,. - «>,: I w ' V 1 jj ;. H 1tEG C I T v, OF MAI-"`!,. l: W00 PA G E. 9 1 1 } :'; / :..+ ! r :: w 1 :� ' 7 `d 1.•1 J ( 1-. E R / Q I-11:: C� 1•�:: R , * :. C) I S T� Ew rR � j V 0 LJ H E R 1 C•HEC:1'-. VE:1'11:)tiR CHs:.%K VEN . 11 . 1 N T e: >� :t �. I_F : CH E -C:I ` Hl.!1'r1 ,E N i MB' R 1)A •1_E NAM I)E.`:;CRII'T 11) N AMr.1UNT AlylC1UINT C U P P L. I ES E: 0 I PM E :14 2 00 . 0 32 6 . 64 I ' • 1661 a . x_61600 03. is�3 9�: •• N HYDRAULI S LI t U F'F'�. I � S VEH C: l.. 1. �: }. �:: t� S j �.;,� �r,, jil 1 1 1',II r, �;1 661820 C} : / :: •:1:` �� :J: P�1 C� f ' H l.. A. t �l 1? Ft E:. V l� � :C C-i F. F'e% A '� :E 01\1 F: f: PA .11- 7' ; 5 0 75 0 I 16615 6 7 • 5 .. 03 23 9 2 NUTES N .AV Ll" °NI~ T E����lEi.. i'RAT NI1�G „t. 0 7 t I 1. ......... .. 67 0 3/23/ ?2 :.:+.� R0 � Y .r r� r� N C: r -. -.; ,.= G- �' 1.1 �. 7 H :� I'J 21 11':0 r� f ?'� F (1� 1. ryl 17 680(.--()0 03/.2 �� /`. -�2 1i1C; Tf)F'US C AR U4 lei A IN T VEH �: 105. 00 j1.. MAINT VEH ::�` . PC} � h'1 A I1�1' x:111... 2,l MAINT. VEH tl r _ _ - - - -- _ .._. _ ... _... _....... _ ._.. _.._ .. _.. _ M AINT V I::E'1:i�1..E . __ ..... _ _ -_... _.. .......... MAINT VE.I1 E.. k:. 7. M AIN T VE H I C L E 7,. "i0 � - - -- - - -- �33 Iyl A I N T V 1::1•i I C:: i E 1 ,+ ; .} 19 5 « C f.} 1 „ / , r_e (" t ,� t i ". .. .. i 1 1 5 00 03 /23 / 92 t PHO T ! »t 'aJ i »' 1 � - ! rw �:.t ( t " ' _ .• j R .. r CA 1 -1371 ,i PRI NTS +.1 6 ii r �� 1 I f ' FEE ' S E R V IC E 9 90 10 �ti 7 -, CS . �_ I � j I' I 1. 6619 7 , CI 65 f f.. V 1 .f ..� •� •.• ff 9 ; 1 �� •.! /•• •.1 -! f•. 1 t .. �r E J' y { • r, E. . ! i. S. . rI. .\ ...1 �. CON k S I * t , ry � - �. I •.! l. �. 1 l,.= , M.- L1 - 4 ,,•y* 1 0 • 0 1� �R { « 4 y - i. � kf 'tl �• i ,. } �. q i I i 421 4,11 � .166 f 1 �;} t�} �:J : ; �' . �� `�" c., 9 2 F+` A I�! C OU NTY I11 T r CI S 0 � � Fi t;1 lrt " � C OST S t i 1.1 I H E:. R r. i N `•,} "! R' C• i.1:? �+ 1 �, p 206 .00 ,f 0 TH E 4: FR f;t l `: i S •:: 7 0 461 I {" 1 R 1 t f MA • F' .f - --- - - ----- f "j 48 16 62 1 7 0 3/2 3/9 2 R R E SC U E S 0 p l ,.1 E 111 l I I P ►F n 0 i,}. t: }5 r O 51j 66 76 1 . 600 0 3/ 23 /92 r Ft1 PJ'i PR IT I1' G S1 .1F'F'!. C U.S t'iF I I E 90 . 0 "} ' 40 53 ^.. , 16 r:+ 2 •_= i} 7 6 '2. 0 er t . - r 1 i" •? .. -r t x 3 / Z -1. • �. '1 f'• 1 , i �; . ,:r _ r 1.1 r i ' t E:j Fy I F' ; 1:J ' � : ` � 2 86.00 j551 �c tl 1 , 1 66 24 77 J 9} 0 .23 • 1:. ' R Y x L R T R A N !. - ) ' P R 1 A:1 :C N 0 1.1 f S .t D E:. R E: N T A.E. �- E: 0 1J 1 1-' 1. 0 � t ,1 0 t� I- 1� j _..... . R N A OU TSIDE �� �• � �' �:'. ;~ . �". _....... ... .... ...:.. ................. :..., �" f M _.... ....._..... � -�_ -} C.. ti. 1! Z i �.. {4� I•I EII _.. _..... _....._... .._ .. - ......._ . . ._.._.. _ :..__..._ _.__..._.. _......_�___..... -. _. __....._� I(31 i i't 2 1.' 7;; {;J:;; (Jt,J 0 :.s/ f.:, /,a.. 1•• : 1. r. ;' OF ' ^� ''si�i } �''�' S & M I:-I L: FF I1.1C: S INC:. r t1� �: ^_i:if ; s1.1F� F T� /� 1.1 06 s2 63 � 16 6 12. 6 79 0 166 , 0 y..i / 2 3 / ' .`• f t« s 1 Lr H O 1 1 1 M A D f O N INC. fj T H r f'V L • l N f } i [i U la i 1. O N COS 2 ff 0 0 tj « 250 � J ! 1.6627 0100075 0 3 SE:.Af' -1 AMA' 1 T it. S t »1 F, tT r 57 �,~ 4 7 011 -. 10 'I " 5 1 ) f . °: 8 q 1 "' ::. 0 1 ::: ' �� 0 � :' / 2.. f ` :- 1 i. 7� I t 71�`•� r:t � + Y I -1 R' � 1'" I.. 14 N i.+ l ` � "' l� I» ; f : �:i .. � 1 � » F- � f �„ .j :. 0 1. } 711 49,.00 220moo I 662 w f t t • 2 '.! . 1' 1 S1- t ,�, ,. A C: 1.. E. A 1 I l`+1 '�. H OUSE 1. "i• .. �� A Y I'ri 5,40 . (,l ,�} 5 , 6 r+ r.;+..:.• r..f nx. ..r. -•x^. -,.... -R�.sw!c7*?wra+.yr • N w� , •"^`"vm�«•"'++yf",^�+,s5�."'.. t V0 U(;HREG CITY OF MAP L.i::Wi;: PAGE 10 i I I r. a + r• r 1 7 �,�� ;Ltr HE i=I; {::i1t:.Ci RL:t :t5T�.R' FOR PERIOD 16 f z 3 VOUCHE 4 CHEC VEND CHt:.t::C: VLN1af.)F; 1 11 k:m C:H NUMBER NLJMI -) R ))A TE h+AME 1)I `:iC I P T 113N AC'i0k. NT AMOUNT r 1 6630 8. .50 0::1 e:: 92 Mf:.ASURTNC•i SYSTEMS BOOKS 16.00 16.00 �y 1 8 316 00 0 ;x/2 a/ 9'Z si�' S OFFICE P kI)DUC� TS SljF•F 1,.�:E S_ Ei - .itt11~` __ .. _- .__ _ _ . -...- __... _... - -_- ._.. _ -- - -- _- ..... _ _. __....... _ .._ ._ ._ .__..._._ _.. - - -- _ _ __ _ -. _ _ __.. ? lU LJF'F'L.Z is S E: Q1.i l f.'MI "N "; 4 � . 73 I ) I 1 w 4 E1 U is -' 1`' 1.. T. E. `, O F i` 1 C is 7 j 1 I 121 �� t.1 F` F' L I ES - Q F F T C F. _1� SUPPLIES--OFFICE 8.618 i ti' I ;I6 � t.1 F' F' l..:C L.- i F f : Y C:: i; 3 . 4 `� t j ; I s S UP P Lx F - Of-'; 1C: I t -- S UPF'L.1 isS - Oi•• i:- 7 9 3 1t� ai.1F'F`LII: }- 01- --F P54.4 1 ; 1 _. -_ _.. _.____ _..._.. _...._...._._....._.__._ _, .__..- ._..... __.._...._._ .... .............. _. __..._.......� .. _ ..... _.._- - _..._.. _ - -- - - ........ _ _. _..- ___..._. IU SUF I E-.1 F i'l,•E 3 4 1 8 . 1 4 I � 16 1'. 32 84 03 0 0 03 /Z?/92 S .P B O OS; STAT 1, SU E S !;IFC= isCE 55.7 , 122 SUPPLIES-011- 23 1"ROGRAM 5 ' , 4 .301 13 i a 132 ? .. 8 4 0 4 0 0 �. ._ f ... �•+ � 4 ` CITY -•;- �/ �• may, �� � �y Thy �• I 1 6 6 3 3 «+ 3 / i . 1 f � � ! w � A. L.F l.. kr J. i i � 1 �' i 1't G I•; F9 J. iii T / � �. A � x � i I: =T CITY OF T„ PAUL 50 3 2fi J• I �9 16634 840601 0 ! -` r � T f'' AUI. !- Sr ., S ; ,... ' " .. Z: •� 2. -. ,:::, .� F x ..+ l� €:. €: f� F � € �1 �1 :� i.i r -:� t.• � :E r- :€ i:j N � �:< M € � �:� E. f S f�f :� f:' c, -..-' i ` I 3 1 6635 8'435 7 03. /Z3I 92 STRATUS CO1'iC U 1 ER, INC. 1'!A IN 1 ENAIKC4. EOtJ: P w L 1482.00 1 1 '"t8'i�`.'..00- 141 33 1663 8-4,,575 ()3 ST RL" I C;H FRS GU 5 U1" 'F'1. I t: s ve: fil CI,.E 74 . 95, t:lj SjUPP V 1 lam) 5 w 6 0 1 80 w 5 t 36 1.6 63 7 8 5 L.� i 8 0 «" 1 .. �.� � 9 2 S LI IV R A Y TR C• i�� S i. S I � 1 � , ,-+ 77 - ' � � i.i F: V A L. (.i �• H A 1~� i� �� Ft L. .� i.1 f•• i:•• !. I is ;� €:. , i. 1 C= t �l! r, 16638 8 5 1 7 -.. . Z '13 9 ,.. S Y S TEMS S U f" E 1.. Y INC ,., U F P L. I ES O OF ! CE 19.45 f Olt _ __. _ __- - -- -- -- - -- -- - S, k � P F !« J. �: �.1 � t �" i i C f,,, 5 d w r: 0 113 15 ` I l �ll i 41� i, 6 6 3 9 8 10 0 0 -J + i.' 3 i. T.J. A U T O PARTS S U1 P \. 1 ti. s J V C: H .k` (: �. i.. �C r �wi I Jti� l .:. �: • �: r.. �:.. r' I t:t 166,40 860650 03 /Z3r9Z TARGETL STCjRES 'b•FC;• A/R SUPPLIES JANITORIAL 'tZ8w08 � S U F' F' L I F OF 44 1 7 3 , 0 7 166 8 6 1 F0 1�1 :.;,./2;:�/9 2 Ti R R F'R A r; UFF'L I' S 73 n 7'0 '-� 7.0 I ,.: 7 = w (stn' ......- ...___......_ ... _ ........ .... ...._, ..... _ _ , . .. +'�? i.r:, ��, :i, 3 /2/ 9 2 THA1�it:. HA F' C:HFV. F;!: M �:i1� /VF. Ci.�.` : i� U h�:l :,u` R & M V E H1C:.LE: I�t 9. 87•'1 800 O /23/92 _ TC.+W': }: i MAlNTENANC:I: MA'i I: R:iA . 2 : :• ; r - _ -; -- --- f��'�� .. 0 2 3 9 ... TWIN CITIES ! R AND T ; I N G •`• c � ;.� c:t - 0 w �, � c:y '? 1 �1,I 16 88 0 9 � •d r:. +.J 4. TW 1�) .i T H 1 l d: W A f'�4 ti, CO. s1 �. T �..� 1 : . ;) 98,3 I• L'I bL y _ ..� . . - - -.: - --- --- - - - - - -' -- '- --- " -= ... C.:_�--- �=- -- -.,. ..- L_._ ...il...Y ... .: _�..- _- .��I�.._- -.. -. „ H. ».,. .e.- n. 1. n •*x.^•- y^�'r.:�•-+TI- .,:. -r � r. +:•.-• r, 7 „�+,pr^7. +..:....z<m +Yn'^s+=m'• L I -.. __..- -- - . er an .=rnonorr.,rMro+a,. =.ar••�.r�»,. .l .,...p..,.... , .i^s*.- •+t.c an= .•,...^t� ^..»:•- *�ra+rrr '.•. g«. °'�,.•^ss^taPe. V 0 U C H R E G C I T Y tyl A P L E W 1) ACHE 1:1 � « . _ ( s { 1 _ 1 t T� r S T E f' Q R F` E R 10 D 1 r t _ , . -� ,�, UI:E C.f, ! a NUMBER NU111E.ER ) fir, 1 1~1AtfflE DESCRIP Aiw!G UNT AMOUNT 1. +:f r:. , _ , i j �) r 0 3 �` I:• � . ,:. _. T' - '1''1 C T 'f T - - : r, FO ,� S ERVICE n FEES FOR t 't t.i • '1. • E 20.00 40.00 1 ' r;l 1 6 r:' 9 0 i :. 0 3/2 3 ' / 9 2 . US TI_fY C O . 1 f n Pfii. t :iU I i:.40 n 8 '.! J I131 I I . PRO y 7 15 j ' 1 664 8 8 ' :J 0 ' :+ 0 0 0 +:' 1 2 :' >� ' :'J 1 W 3 - WEST //''' � y��qq �j { }' r p /'' � � t `j � y n S Li 1 � { t' ` M 1 i N r C.• A - 1 J, N. J � �,- . � �.• j_� �- ���' E i t ' . l F O R f :/ { FZ ��. J. 4 E ..... .. ----- - � � I n T �. y ,- y � yt 1 ( w f � w' I 1 () 1 1 , 1. 6 6 4 9 9001.00 0•3 J 2 »J ° J. L,I3Y I F ORMS UNI•..L M.1 [ ED L N :. F 0RM t.•1.1.1 _R 1 _i �• } �� p i .t 14 i q �" � i« �' n t 1 ± •� <.1 N T M FIF.. R » - U NI F ORM S ICL 0`1� HI �� {:� ,.J,�J 5 -- - 1 1 25 UN1F f.: C;L.0T1�INC� n r. U 1\1 I FOR 118 C 1. 0 H I N G _ .f .M U NIFORMS :ti: 'a i i..O ) I 7. (4G 2 9 U P. � t �: - �. ��� l.f :i r 1 -, � ,., X31 I U r�j � F w � � • ] ('� i � f � i i �.. # i J. � t t �i �! « i ___ _ _ 1.11:1t ��; C1. 1 f• '10- _ U N T F 0 tz tw1 S C; L 0 T 11 I N G : t tyy �, M �.� F:, _..,__ ... -.. ._ _ _..... __ _...._... _.. --- ..._....._ .__ ._..._.. _.._ _ _ j 1J I>� ► I_i R 1Y1 } :; .. "! .�'... _ 65 ......, .... _ ._ ..,.� .. ,......_ _.W... W W...,.� ... . w..... W� _ .. ". .... k' � 3 1.• I N.', r i fti O .. ;:i +: � �. 1'1 �. 1�1 U 1 92.36 ,37i 1.11' t FO R NI 1 C1. H:1 11 w ,�t�:� 1 z , 65 3 . I (;� '� F' 1 �„ 1 t t .,••I 0 f.! '• am � 0 � 3 1 •' r r;. c �� t� � f � 3 � C.. •..f � . � 2:. � « f � w ri � .,,• {.y U N T . ! E D B U f.J) N �' S S MACHINE S � w • r .... _ . _ ..�_ - �w- _ - - - -._ _ _ _. . _ __ . -'- ,' 1 � C.. I L. 3. �; ��y .». t t F f-- I C E - --- -' • - -- - - -- - •- - - . _ -- - -- � --- --- -- - ' J 9 >, , [ t.� I _. �.1 I - - 99.70 16651 910500 tz: �d2 ��'92 _ - _ _._. VA f1't! R(Jr:31- ISH REMOVAL. ��1,,. _. _ . _. ... _ _ - _ . R1.11: �H RFMr.�V'���� _ . - - - - _... �.. - - - - -- - -- _ -... __ ._... _ __ ... _ ... ;:' _ _ { } j , Qt L. _ _. _� f 7. .. ..... 14 '� I I 1665 f 9 1 �. J 5 6 0 0 . * l f f 3 P c '' w. Y � 1 7 .i i.• 1.'A. .l � 1... 1 M ` � t� � 1.• I'' '' .1 �..� 1 'i ti: 1: { Y .1 l.• L:. - _ - �i i, l �� 7 j � , � �� �; { _ 5 2..4 SN ,; ` t ' f I.• »t :1 f S6 ._ { •_+ '••J � :�..s „y0 �• •.1 { 'f.: �! 1` ,�t ✓ 03 J" 23/. 2 ��q '�} � . •• .... {r ''~ WEBER i ROf.,I F H INC. r� � k �y f �•�• ;� t� 1 { �{• SL �i� i8ICi .«E �; r H /'' 1 rt .1 665 4 _ _ ''J f_.i _ _ t� »� / .: .�! rt :jZ C- _ t� i C, t h ` �� R0 ii 1, `"�P "� RAT I i_�1 S t 14 E -� "� E J: 4: c.i 5 �l ,.. L1 ` F f P t tJ U F 1 •~' I.. `3 •.. l j t•" !.`' ? C ':! ' n 16 ' SUPPLIES OFFICE 8 � r»' J tJ ... . ... K .r 1 'a n � 00 _ S U P I i 1 66 5 5 0 t 2 :: Z EP M f;0 1' C Ht M T C.:A�.`:t 17 8 5 1 7 8 x={ ' 16 7 TOTAL 1 qq 1 7 W 73 I T � J` I * /- I . - 0001 m '� w % . '. ^ ` f -. 1=4= r-% g , ,f - R - F .:, . * .~ `~ , *: f � ,:, * * : , : :::,::, i . I..'' .::::.:. -:- -.-::-,-::-,- ,� - ��;: , , :�-;x: ... -:�::� -, . - * ~~ `~ * :--.'. *.... * �....... .2 0 +-...-...'.'.. . ..,.:::.: p: ,.:.:::.:.:. 9 .. ........ --l. ... , .. I �:;. . . .- .. ,- .... . ... 9 . . . .... � 1. i 24 �� i 2 1:5 E. 4 0 03/1 .3 A N D R tl-:-� A J & OSTER 30 9 40 , 32:...., ,::::I::+:::**.:.:.:.::..*,�::.: . ... .... U4 34 �� I `~ 0025643 2 t 36 i� 40 38 ............. ... . . ..- � + .... -- ... - - : ,:, * *::.:.: .. : ..: --:. . :,-,,,'---- - - .. .... -.. . . H 40 if H 0 41 0 ff ,� 1 1 -~ l ii _' 5 �, * 53 oo 4 � 1 0 U i 2G7.63 267"63 ` - ` 2,03G.93 -- 920. 08 1,246.10 � �� 821.14 '. ^ ` li CITY OF MAPLE-WOOD C-) C) 2- EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD vp , X6 N1 r, g PAT ............. . . . ................. . ............... ........ ..................... . ... ........ .. . ......... . .. r . X . . .. ........ .. ... ... .. . .......... ... . . . . ....... . . . ...... ..... ....... . ..... ..... . ..... ... .... . ... . .. .......... .... ...... . ...... ...... ... ... . ....... . ...... . ..................... .............. .. ... .. ...... .... ...... .................. ........ .. .. ....... ....... .. ....... ...... ... . ....... ....... .. .. .. ..... : ....... . .. ...... ............ ................ .. ... . .. ....... ... ........ .... .... . ........ .. . ........ . .. ........... ... ...... ... ........ ....... .... ....... ............... ............ ....... ..... ... .. ..... ............ . ...... ..... .. .... 3:: ..... . ..... ........... ..... ... ... ... ....... ....... .... ... .. ..... . ... ... ........ ...... . ............... . .: .. 1...-,.,. .1 .. .. ..... ........ ........ ..... ... . ...... . .. ... .. ....... ..... ..... . . . . ........ .. ..... ..... ........ ... . .. ........ .............. .......... Kc 5 0 6 7 .................. ........ ........... ... ......... ........ . .. . ... ... .. ..... .. .. . .......... ...... .... .. ........... ..... ... .... - .... . . ..... .... ........ .. . ..... ... ......... ...... ............ .. ....... ... ' . .......... ........ ......... ....... ....... ............ . ..... ......... ......... ............ ........ .. . ..... .. . ... ... ..... ..... . ........ ... ...... .. .............. .. ... . ....... .......... I...,..,......... ......... ....... .. ......... ...... . ..... .. . . ..... ... . ... ..... .... . ....... .. .... . ... ... .......... ...... ...... .......... ....... .. .... ....... ...... . . ............. L p c 4E .. . . .... . .......... . . .. .. ... . .. ...... ....... ........... 8 ......... ... ......... . ..... .... ... .... ......... ... .... .......... .. .. .... ...... ..... .. . . . . .. ....... .............. ...... ... . . .. .... ...... ..... .. . I ................ .......... .. .......... .. . ....... ..... ... .. ............... ... ..... . ...... .......... .... ....... .... ....... . ..... ...... .. .......... ... ... ..... ........ .... . . . . .... . .... .... ............. . ... .. .. ....... .... ... ... ................ .... .................. ... ..... .. . ... ...... ... . .... ....... ... .......... .... . ... .... .... .. ...... ..... .... ... .. ....... . ... . . ..... .. .... . . ...... ........ ... .. ......... .. ....... ........ . .. . ....... ..... .. ... .. ....... .. . ... ......... ...... I.............., ............ .. .............. . ..... .... .... ... ... .... . ...... ....... . .... .... .... .. ... .......... ... . ... . ... .......... ........... ...... . ... .... ..... .. ...... .......... .. ... ...... ... .... ........ . . ........... . .. .... ....... 10 o r cy 12 13 .. . ... . ...... ... .... .. . . ..... .. . .... .. . .......... . .. ....... . . .. ... ... ...... . .: . ....... ...... . . ........ ..... ...... ...... .......... . .. .. ...... ....... ........ . ... ......... .... ...... ... .... .. ..... ........ .. .. ....... ........ .. . ....... . .. ............... .... . .................. ... .. . .. .......... . . . . ........ .... ..... . . ... ....... ...... .... ......... . ........ .... ............. .. 14 ..... .......... ......... . ...... .. . ......... .......... . . .. ..... ... ................ ......... ............ . ....... ........... .. . . . ....... . ......... .... .... ... .. . ..... 151 . .... ......... ........... ..... .... .. . . . ......... ... ....... . ..... . ..... . .... ..... ..... ........ .. .. ... ....... . ... ........ ... ...... . .. .... . .... .. ....... ... 16 17 6 1 18 .... .......... . . . .... .......... ......... ....... ..... .... . .. ... . ... ... . .. .. .... .... .......... ......................... ...... ..... .... .. .. ......... .. ....... ...... .......... . ....... .. .. .. ...... .. . .. ...... . . ...... . .... ... .. ... . . ........... . . . .......... ......... ... .. ....... ... . ...... .. ........... ......... .. ..... . ... . . .. .... .. .... ............. ..... ... ........ ...... .......... ... . ..... . ... .... .. ... .. ... ... .... ...... . .. .. ... .. .. .. ... .... ...... .... .. .......... ..... .......... 9 . ............. .... .. . ......... .. .. .... ....... .. . ..... . .. .... .... ....... . ...... .. .... ... . . ...... . . .......... . ... . ... .... .... .. ..... ..... . ......... ........... ... . .......... . ............ ...... 22 21 24 25 ... .. ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. ...... .. .. ...... .. ... . ....... ... ... ... ....... ............. .. ........ . ........ ... . . ....... ..... ... ...... . ... .... . . .. . . . ... . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... ....... ....... .......... . .... .... .... ........ ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :N; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 26 . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 21 00 2 E-. 8 7 � ��..t� � s..a��i ��T � ���L��`�� 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lo ..... ..... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. -t .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nnW.. 34 35 7 0 0 1- 31.19 2 36 4b 37 . . . . . . . .. . ..... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - .... . .. ..... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FEN: . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 :.L:..... .. . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . ... . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ 40 41 42 4b 43 . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 0 L �H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ................. .............. ...... 46 47 48 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :H; S -ON" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . 5V . . . . . . . . . . . 9 � , . . ; _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 � 53 0025S79 54 55 .... . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . KE :A E- - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R: B - - . . . . . . . . . . ... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 57f� . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... .1 :: .'.. . L ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11116,50 0 " CITY OF (}003 1 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ' FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD . . I * , , , : ; . . : , " : , . . . " " '��.'.'— .." ....... ... . . . . � . - .--. , ` 03/13/92 _ VIRGINIA DOWDLE 944~44 03/13/92 DALE RAZSKAZOFF 1,603.11 wm 40 03/13/92 RICHARD C DREGER 1,622.37 �� KEVIN R HALWEG 1,829.76 1 12 03/13/92 RICK A BOWMAN 1v684~47 - 9 F 18 03/13/92 JOHN FRASER ` 1, 508. 35 '� . . �� . ....... ... ..m . . . . . . . . . ..... M. I.M. +m ..'....'-.. .m.m., .' mm.'... .--....m .. .m. m'. + .M.L '+ . m m . . m � . . . m . . m . . m m � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LM... 'M'-m+r-'-'-'-'- r .+M,., - - . m mm . . . M- .....L. M . ... .+..++.'mm....m -m-' r-m�"m.+.........M..."�.,...,..+. : M . M . . M . M . .m . . m m . m , - -.,M.M .-. M+MM.M L L ,. M . M -MM '.-'-..'."' - . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . .'.'.M.m'M -'�'-MW:L: *'. ' -'� :':M:M:':':M.':"M"' mm ,-,- - .. .. M.... . ...m-mpmm'+ ... ,m,m.m,.,.,r,m w 'm .m � . ...m.., m ..m , .' . r ... - --� ..: --:� --:�- r -L... : :.:.: : :-, : , -- -1 . . :�:' * , . . . � , , : ��;��.�'I:- - ' ", , ", m+"* "m . . . * --, - ,:.:M : -x:."� U-::d� b . . ... ... .. . ` .. .... I..4,:.:::::::::::::,.;::::::..�..�4 ........... ....-'.... ..::.: ... :,::, �--.-.-........... 03/13/92 p 28 1 �� v 30 i. # It 33j:::" I :, -,.. . + ... t 34 � i 0 0 il Tr _� ......-...'..—t �la i�k*."*�;i�w):"?L'�i���::5:�7't:�!*Iw�'�'.........., ...' �l �� - ..... .. � ... —� ..— ..... w W+ .11. � .. . ....... ' - �� t. fl ~- 1. �� r 54 t, 0 w . . I b -. .. I . . . I . . . I � . . . .: :.: . . � �� : .. .......' ............ � .. ........ ... -- - +..�.......,+...�....,....,......"�... , , , : ; . . : , " : , . . . " " '��.'.'— .." ....... ... . . . . � . - .--. , ` 03/13/92 _ VIRGINIA DOWDLE 944~44 03/13/92 DALE RAZSKAZOFF 1,603.11 wm 03/13/92 RICHARD C DREGER 1,622.37 03/13/92 KEVIN R HALWEG 1,829.76 03/13/92 RICK A BOWMAN 1v684~47 - 03/13/92 JOHN FRASER ` 1, 508. 35 '� . . . . m � M M - . . . . . . � m . r m - � - - - M - m . - ' - - - - - m : :.: , :-:- :.: :�: m . . . m . . . . . . � . . . + . . . r m . r m . M . . . - � ' . L . . M . . . � M ':� ': :':,', .:.:r,.: .- ,:.:.:- .:.:':':L:':': ..-. . . ....... ... ..m . . . . . . . . . ..... M. I.M. +m ..'....'-.. .m.m., .' mm.'... .--....m .. .m. m'. + .M.L '+ . m m . . m � . . . m . . m . . m m � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LM... 'M'-m+r-'-'-'-'- r .+M,., - - . m mm . . . M- .....L. M . ... .+..++.'mm....m -m-' r-m�"m.+.........M..."�.,...,..+. : M . M . . M . M . .m . . m m . m , - -.,M.M .-. M+MM.M L L ,. M . M -MM '.-'-..'."' - . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . .'.'.M.m'M -'�'-MW:L: *'. ' -'� :':M:M:':':M.':"M"' mm ,-,- - .. .. M.... . ...m-mpmm'+ ... ,m,m.m,.,.,r,m w 'm .m � . ...m.., m ..m , .' . r ... - --� ..: --:� --:�- r -L... : :.:.: : :-, : , -- -1 . . :�:' * , . . . � , , : ��;��.�'I:- - ' ", , ", m+"* "m . . . * --, - ,:.:M 03/13/92 JAMES MEEHAN 1 83 0.30 � 03/13/92 JAMES M EMBERTSON CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0004 EMPLOYEE G ROSS ' EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ' FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD JULIE A STAHNKE ' JOSEPH FEHR HENRY F KLAUSING EBI PIR ~ 1 3 ' 1, 2260 90 1,226.9f) ^ 1,619.70 � � 1,274,74 , / 0025712 0 - 1715 23 `=- == 0 41 00-25-3727 ° � ^ � � 4 0 53 JULIE A STAHNKE ' JOSEPH FEHR HENRY F KLAUSING EBI PIR ~ 1 3 ' 1, 2260 90 1,226.9f) ^ 1,619.70 � � 1,274,74 , / il� �� ' / CITY OF 00O5 � tl EMPLOYEE G� SS EARNINGS AND PA�ROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ' �� �: FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD I 1� * %j Lt .~ a � 1 1. li � 0 ' ; ` 0 11 0025739 ` 03/13/92 KATHLEEN M DOHERTY 1,182.90 � �� 1,8GG.10 03/13/92 WALTER M GEISSLER 03/13/92 . TANIA CHASE `� � 2,124.27 ' 1,222.10 . I. 1,619.70 � 50.75 Lt 1 1. li � 03/13/92 KATHLEEN M DOHERTY 1,182.90 � , r. 1 � . 0 r ..f ..,5...h�•a1 f C k L,�S��� "G �S�vS�• 1L' ,���L'�•�.�y+Wi'S "x'.��E6 -l..t' �5�;�'4l�BeLI.�SxaJE6.�S ':�'� .. h ��... � yjY 5 'i:, V � � � t,1 l �. .' .. L... a,..ju�� e i k x r f. . �a•1. 5 ,:,, s �Nr ti� .� >.� 'v.7. .,,. r wr- IF WOOD CITY 0 MAPLEE 00QE EMP Y .E ROSS -EAR I NG13i AND PAYROLL DIE UCH' I ON CHECKS FOR i E� RRE T PAY PERIO 1 / _ _. - ,. 1. 2 '; €...... ", :> : .. - :.::.. 51 _ _ i:... Zj ! 3 03 /1 3/92 ANC M I Sit EL L 4 �. _ � �... •_ 6 .. fj[: ..:: ,.: }.,... } x . ..... .. _ .. } ...... i..i .. .. fF:...SF S. :. . ..:. ..:.:.......:. ... ...... .. ; .:: :: :: .: : :.. `.:. . :.:ice::: "' :' ... �.? :: :: .lY - . �.. .. .S1d(Y{ :.JM:. .:: :. ..... ..' .. '.:: : .. ...... : .. .. .. .. ...... ..... . . .......... .. .: ... ..... . .. ... .. ..: ...:. ::.:. •.: :. .. ..... ....:... ... . ::.' .::. ........ .....:::.. .......... ... .... 9 ..... { Yom.. �.,... _..... , : :,....... .;:. 1. - ,. -. [. .. ; W 10 1 18 F 12 13 ' .,�, . y '. .. .. :.: .:.. :::. :'.::.:. : : .......:.:.... .. .. . ----:T RMD�' 14 :. '. .: .. 16 9 1 0 10 18 19 .:._.:.... -:._ :..:...... ._ . _. ...... ..... t s. ........., _. : :....:. . :. . .... _: :. .......... <: 22 24 . ... 25 : ,.. ......... .. - _ ,. :... ..a..... ,' '. ::::...........:... _ :.: ..... ... t.. ...,w .......,,Y .. :.r...3r. :� �...�:..: �.i.�.... .., .,..:...... y .. ... '' ... ... '.:.:. � � �. � �a�iar►. - ''.: .... :.: ' ' ... .fir. .; .:..'+ +....' -.� +`.- .:.. ..' :. : "�*i.. ... .' .. - ...:::.. .. -; -: .. :: ... :. .... .. ... � �. /:L.t: Tian► �.Y�:�..... � :....... '.....:::... ` .... . .. ..... ,{ .7. :. 26 6 { ..:.:....., . : :. ..'.,: ..:.. ... ::. :... . :..:::::.... .. ::... .. 28 N 30 (( :..... ( . ..... _.. .. :. 3-41 :...- :....... _ .............. .. .. o. .... w•w.� vv: $... :..F .. YMF ..... ...... ..... ..... .......... '.. .. .:....►. :: . . .� ..... ... .... +5..... :..--�.... . ..... F. : :t' :. : :..� ' .:. w rw,. ... .. ..fi. ..... ..... .. .... ...- .... ... ...... .. .... ...... .. ... .. ... .. ... ..... ..... ... �.wt. YZ: .. �•. .... .... . .... 3 .. ..... .. :. :.; ... . ..... :....::. .. .. :::.. - - ::. . :... ... .. ... .: ;.. . :' ..'.: .. :.: : :.': - ... . ::. . . _ .....:..... . _.... .. ... w. w..� _. _..... a... .......- �•c...:.:.... _ _ ................. _.. ... ........... ... f.. ... ..... .. .� .. ....... .. . ... .... ........... ........ .... . .... ... ..mss........... �. Y. :. :: 34 ` 36 e , .... . _. Y..'�.il..- .: .,.......:. ..: �... faT... 1: r i 38 ..........El. ..M•.. S1alI(.7YM..j. ... .lff . ... ...... ... ........ .. ... . -... ..... .... ..... ..... ... ... ........ .. . :: :..:: ..: .. ..... :.: .. ::. :..::...:.:.:'.... . :... . ::: ..,�Miii:. .. :.... :;..,;...::.: :. .:. :.:. :...... .. .. .::. ..... .. :.: Y4 .. ,.iW : iw.. ... -.... . ... ...... .. ..�... ..�... .... ... ... .. .. .. -..: .. .: v . .... .... ...- .. .. :.•,. .:: ::::::v ... �. a -. 40 41 nn 0 �,.� � � � -€ S I V O I D 03/ 1 3/ 92 9 0 7 4 42 " ".:- ... 43 _ ..........:....:. :, .... ...... a . i :.. .. .... _ ... :. :......: :: :::...:::.:.:..:.. > . . ..... .... .. ..::....:.. ,:.._:::.:.:- :...:..:... ::•....:.:::::.:,..:.:.: _ ;<.: -.< .- :.:... .... ...:._..... - Y .... ..... ... 1! .: :: :..- .:: >...... ; :' <':::::... :.:: <:;:::. >. 4 4 :•:::::.. 1? .. . : _ __ .._......... ...__ . -- _....... _ _ :: _ ... __ . :_ : , . , .:. :: :.... .. . ::..... :... ..... ..... ........... ....... :... ......: ... _ ........ ... ..... . - .. .. - ..., ::.:... ... _. .. ... .,..:.....:..._. :..... j » .. as .. �.. ..... ...... ._..... _.... .. - - . ... .... ... .... ... .. ........... . f 46 R u I 47 T I UST-457 48 1 ........... 2 �y .: ... .. .... ..... ........ ... ............u•.. .... .. ... .. .. ,.. ..:.':..: .. :. .. ..:. ..::.....:....... . ..... �.�., ...... .. ... ..... . ... t L.S..j' i Z... .. ....... ..... .. ., -. :::..::.. ........... ...... ....';......c:.:>::: : o:::> :::� ::>:.:•>: <:: ... ..:. % %::: % ' > :::... .'. ;:. i:i►' : ik : -...F :. :` ,' <1 j 5 0 ..:- .. ..... ::'.:::. .... :..... ........ .... ........ .. .. .....:... .. . . :::....: .......... .... ...... ... .. ... .. ..... .. :::..:::.. ..........:... : ........ .:... ' ........ 51 _ :..;.:,:.:..: : .. ...��' .. _ . _ ............ _ .. .... .. _ _........... ••a ................ :.. -� . 52 • _ 5 7 8 26 8726 0 54 ::' :. :' :..:. 1 51 ......:. 5 . _ __ .. . _ ... _. _ .. _. _.... _ ....._ _ :.. : ..... :. _, _ .`: _. 0 r� i clan .b Council: MEMORANDUM TO: C ity Manager Erid ®use � ® ���� FROM: Ken.Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: BRA Reap pointmen t Rej � DATE: March 4, 1992 INTRODUCTION Larry Whitcomb is requesting that the City ouncil appoint the Hous nd Re � y pp him to n g development Authority for a five -year term., BACKGROUND The City Council appointed Larry Whitcomb to the HRA on November 13, 1989. This appo intment was to fill a vacancy on t �, y he RECOMMENDATION Reappoint Larry Whitcomb to a five -year term on the BRA. kr /memo82.mem F 3 Aotion by Coun MEMORANDUM:: Ighdorse TO: City Manager M odified. .. FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner - �e� ecte SUBJECT: Condit Use Permit Review f5 " LOCATION: 1661 Cope Avenue Date PROJECT: City /County Emplo Credit Union DATE March 9, 1992 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit (CUP) for an office building at 1661 Cope Avenue is due for review. The City /County Employees Credit Union is using this building. BACKGROUND March 23, 1990: Council approved this CUP, subject to following the approved site plan. March 11, 1991: Council reviewed this CUP and decided to review it-again in one year. DISCUSSION The Credit Union is meeting the only condition of their permit - they developed their site as shown on the approved site plan. There are no other conditions to review so there is no need to review this permit again. RECOMMENDATION Take no action on this permit. te\creditun.mem (Section 10) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Site Plan V WY s GOV i r rsv� 27 a r f : W E 0 o,• b 62 a Rp c V A j C R1E RD 25 Z i LOCATION MAP Z Attachment l 13 14 9411 AVE. .• e 4 3i � Z C 3) (11) (Ito) s' 04 s' 014 Poo t 1 (17 N o c 1 oa S oo S 1 . 1 10 N rl a m fo L9 1' I T'% I 11 � 1 _ h 14C. d � 23 �. • 5 1 ZZ 10 i . 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 JO Lot 1 J 3C. t tv 1 t P. o : Gl$ �. 12 m _ 2 658.2' s T (4) • 1 14— I�2l.i' ' . I ° 331. 8 3 31.8 � ' , A0 '• ff: .• :�"!::: - • to. 2 D 15 T' CT. F 3@73-92 •': +;;. ii+ $�1. dw -44SKS a-w-WE � p �Optsod Dec. IiLe 9�l1 1- . ONOt MNtO •..r, o �.o �� e .�•, - w - w - w ` r� ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ �, 7S1►� 1 M // 1I I. II 75 • / s F F C Q'P Y O F 1 l i�� 4 .~' N� ( i ( 4 5 ) N . P I..► r F o a i t s� t j 1 OE rA1 LS � � l W 100, 38 ~ PO N D •� =-- -- - _ R N • ` •k ' e - MA p L. ,�,%� 141 ` s b► (43� t (4'�) � � M ) o �•4,�;) (4-0 ►�, (50) l 04 04 a do - N M 11 N N 'S 71• p RIM N IKIP @I M 74 �-- '�:Y � of so' �s• _.. fb Oil 44, �. �6 • O��r.3 o f PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 1 OZo �L TOT ^L. 6.12 sc 3o 4 N Wit..;,....... r i !! 1 I �l Mi�J T. i wa T/G SM7 W ►. r"w COPE AVENUE SITE PLAN a Attachment 3 4 N Fy MEMORANDUM T4: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review LOCATION: 2720 Maplewood Drive PROJECT: A -Gem Auto DATE: March 6, 1992 INTRODUCTION Acti ®n by; Counc . Endersed.. Modifiecl�, Rej ecte d Dat On August 13, 1990, the City Council approved a conditional use permit to sell used cars at 2720 Maplewood Drive for one year. (See the conditions on page 5.) The Council renewed this permit on.August 12, 1991 for six months. Mr. Joeseph Yankovec, the. operator of A - Gem Auto, is requesting that the Council renew the permit for another year. DISCUSSION Mr. Yankovec has met all the conditions for the conditional use permit. Staff is not aware of any problems since the last Cit review of this permit. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit at 2720 Maplewood Drive for used car sales in one year. kr / Memo 4 2 . mem ( 4 - 2 9 ) Attachments 10 Location Map 2 - Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 40 8 -13 -90 Council conditions 61 69 VAONA /S HEIGHTS- CD it D W t.' sr 19 A AV v OW --xxv ov 05 , W hirs% N IL OHLMANI AV was CID RD C oftft 23 ftj J � » � � tn� r � P*LU —4 AV (I) CONNOR AV S y W> oft 22 SEXTAN ow 30. LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 n Tot a &6 9ac. NATIdN1►L. g/►TTLR SROA�GI►iT1NCs C� Q • Q 4 A 0 . � a o r 10 � s. 8. co. - �9 IMPORT �O .95 � 1•Ibac ?. • l N � � �� 2 `9 -450 � �Z .946C r 4y .. a .• y ANGUS MEATS so o �� • '� �' t.S 1 ac h , a t oil 119 07 H 10 308 3' S ; 9• w t L� i �.f PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 3 Attachment 2 Q N Q C 0 Y Frontage Rd. H1NY.61 C. HWY.61 SITE PLAN Attachment 3 3. The Planning Co missfon discussed this application on July 16 1990. They recommended to the City Council that said permit be approved. Z. The City Council held a public hearing on August 13, 1990. City staff published a notice in the paper.and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statemrents. The Council also considered r and recommendations of the City staff and Planning comaission. NOW, THZRZFORZ BZ IT RZ3OLVSD that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Cods of Ordinances. Z. The us* would not change the existing or planned character of the sumo a nd l Aq arms. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 49 The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equip wht or methods of operation that would be- dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 3. The use wasld generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parka. 70 The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximise the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. obtaining a license to sell used cars* S -13 -90 Z. Cars for sale shall only be brought to the site for a specific buyer. There shall be no more than two cars for sale at any one time 3* eleven parking spaces in front shall be striped.and include one i2- foot -wide handicap and ten 10- foot -wide spaces. 49 no overnigbt parking of cars for sale. S. All vehicles being sold, except when on a test drive, shall be identified as being For gale clearly* seconded by Councilmember Carlson. Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson and Rossbach. 5 Ways an Councilmember Juker and Zappa. Attachment 4 ) 5 . 5 01 Action by Coun,ci:L MEMORANDUM Endorsed�,� TO City Manager Modifi ed.... FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Ass ociate Planner lie j ectec SUBJECT: Conditional Use P ermit Review Date LOCATION: 600 Carlton Street PROJECT: 3M Classroom Building DATE March 13, 1992 INTRODUCTION The conditional use permit for a classroom building at 600 Carlton Street is due for review. 3M Company is using-this th' p Y g is building, which was the former Carlton Racquetball Club, BACKGROUND Past Actions February 25, 1991 Council granted the CUP, subject to: 19, All construction must follow the site plan on p g a e 12 of the January 30 Staff report. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City council may approve mayor changes. 2, This permit shall be subject to review after one e y ar from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. 3. The use of the building shall be limited to Offices, classes and training labs. 4. There shall be no classes beginning before 8 a.m. or after 7 p.m. 59 There shall be no classes on weekends. 6. The parking lot shall be bermed and landscaped, as required by the Community Design Review Board, unless a plan amendment is approved by Staff ref lecting Council's g desire for evergreens along the east lot line. 7. There shall be no deliveries, garbage hauling, snow plowing g or other cleaning of the lot, between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m. May 13, 1991: Council vacated part of a utility easement that ran under a corner of the building. May 28, 1991 Council revised the site plan allowin g two ground- mounted and two wall- mounted antennas. CUP Duration Section 36- 445(a) states all CUP's shall be reviewed b y the Council within one year of the date of initial approval, unless such review is waived by council decision or ordinance. At the one -year review, the Council may specify an indefinite term or specific term not to exceed five years. DISCUSSION 3M is meeting all of the conditions of this permit. RECOMMENDATION Review this permit again in five years, to \3mcarltn.mem (Section 36 -29) Attachments 19 Location Map 29 Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan K • ' * 1 9ASE AV TER zi C AV . BRAID W A 32 32 o y LA V k .; _ t SE ENTH ST E, or }. i � • -- M 1NWHA MA AV MARGARET �$ Li .rte ••' Pk FIFTH ST P �,. L :. Av Leto zzr rwo 236 r z :% I � -"j • -� �4 quo ' 3 APO %& oftft 2 11 � vZP LB r1 830 1 I -- ,! Ul 1 , . 1 Tonnes *mom 6"Mp PPO p8 • - - -1 i ,�� Lake 28 R.22W. 35 •• 2 1 a Q .. .. r' M�aYER u� •r: JAMES �•� � W ..' J •. Ni�prM: d Z = a •''' •'•' UPPER AFTON R P h = o LOCATION MAP �J Q N 3 Attachment 1 3M MINNEHAHA AVE --AV E.- _. 2534 2546 - 2550 _— ..1 "it .� w t to •/I •• .��.•' /�� r � • •� '• � . �� t 1 •• ' b ow 1 �j 441 • -0) C1t►) ; + ! �' S�f�! � � S � o s i � ' r 3 1 ; � 1.11 ac. y '• �' I• , 0 ,e► r o • r I : • od .., _•••.- - •�..•�_ _�_._ �_�... -.. ..� _�_.. • �• •. ..• .ter . ... �... w_r ••._•I ___•• 1 A v • M d ��` , •� y : -oft 4111 -.r 4w _� • O �- (Z/1o�' ' '♦ ' ' 1 • J • • - - -. �..� 679 r r 4 ro jut I tj 1* 1 1,1 • '" ' N a J t'� _ : • l _ _ •.._. _ _. _ =.. . 1 L, • ; 1 1 mss• Jk i •.t, 2h I _t..._ __. ._ MARGARET of ■ ■ # ■ ■� pit o , 657 �.�_ .. :� a " ;�--,-�� -• •. �r., IL 0 all ale a WETLAND 8 .17 �''— II •. .0 ... �. ..1 1 �� �■ ■�■ ' •; i i 643 ■ R 2 F 0 635 ' ---CI-629 '• �� •� � _ice• •• • ••::. 0 6 2 1: 40 CARLTON RACQUETBALL LUB '��••� , 613 • • ��; y r4 t) S 1 0 0� i 05 o .. 607 . 0 0. low 40 -0 0 ,..... - g FI•F T H •• • • • �c� .._ . -•• -- BUILDING 2 �, 585 p �, - -- _ —._.._ 577 _ ..._. � • V X 5 71 FIRST IMPRESSIONS ❑ 1 9 �•� N — --� I nl• ! Ei a - L CHILD DEVELOPMENT • ... • i CENTER .. _•:.:.:. � ... .... _ _. _ � - _ _...._ 561 • = o 6 .: . 06 • hoc oil Co s . [� - 3M BUILDING #2 52 Z • - -�— -- — s ...•. I.. F ., �. aNT r' . ■ _ - �=/ LAC . �• �o W _... .._ ...•_ _ .0 •_ j4j =..._ t4f ?4 _ - ... _ •�. • _ • • _I _ _ _ •�. r _� _. _, cr • __ W 7 a . Ir too •• its • _ v7! • Ala•. �• s )• . _ ._ _•. •t • _ . .1 151. !tilt•/ St F0 Ls• — T s �. �1:. �., —� .•.. t •. � a r ■ �� ■ S �'�if �i1i1'W 1ti ad, . i s �iro'!i. ' • '�S' 3 � t �� �_� • /•�__1 .�.� f.�`�` f1► CONWAY AVE. PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Attachment 2 4 N • s .• N • • • I •�••i�� 1 I do* TAW AA l 0000000l00000 to i 1 , • i • f • �r E 40 i as g �> •.•• ' • s . f •. M a � flr ' _I go t j 0 all. i f t •� 1 r• �. 4 1%,, oil Ai Op !• i 1 .� �• • 1. ` `• f fit . , `e •.. ;'�+':,. ; t ' ��.; '� /� � , ,• • .• 1 • �. .. �• ..• • ��• • f AI. • • Ate•• � � �:�� • , 1 V f to N { vI p too .' �► •.. J' �j }�''� !. ,: *�.� { � •fl ! fs SITE PLAN 5 Attachment 3 Q N AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT 1 1atioU by, Counoil::� Lnclorsea TO: City Manager Modified eoted FROM: Assistant City Engineer Bruce Irish Date._.;. SUBJECT: Conway Avenue —T.H. 120 to McKnight, Project 91 -03 -- Accept Project and Release Retainage DATE: March 16, 1992 Introduction The bituminous overlay and retaining wall refurbishing project on Conway Avenue is satisfactorily. complete. The attached resolution, authorizes acceptance of the project and release of retainage. Background The existing budget provides adequate . funds to close out the project. Recommendation It is recommended that the attached resolution be adopted. BAI RESOLUTION ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT .WHEREAS, the city engineer for the City. of Maplewood has determined that Conwa y Avenue—T.H. 120 to McKnight, City Project 91 -03, is complete and recommends acceptance of the project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that City Project 91 -03 is complete and maintenance of these improvements is accepted by the city. Release of retainage in the amount of $8,803.84 is hereby authorized. G W I MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate S UBJECT: Conditional Use Permit LOCATION 47 South Century venue APPLICANT: Y Lutheran Church of Peace PROJECT: Church Addition DATE: February 26, 1992 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AGUM by Council # Planner Ehdorsed ReJ The Lutheran Church of Pe • Pea is asking for a conditional use permit (cup), Code requires a CUP f the char or churches. The CUP would bring church into conformance with the ordin Descrimtion of the Pr000sal The Lutheran Church of Peace is lan • p Wing t0. 10 Build a 61360 - square -foot two-story addition. The addition would be for offices, classrooms and a nursery. The applicant also would add new windows i the south and west elevations of the existing building and put a new vestibule on the church, stibule 2. Add a new driveway in front of the e church and widen the driveway in the rear between the two parking lots. 39 Add 11 parkin g stalls. 49 Build an entry -way addition on the ' west side of the youth ministry center. This s is the house north of the church formerly used as the parsonage, ' CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL Section 36 states that t • he City Counc may approve a CUP .based on the nine standards fora ' in the resolution on page 9. pp rov al• Refer to the findings RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution on page 9 rant' • g ' granting a Conditional use emit for a chu rch at 47 South Century Avenue. T p his permit is based on the standards for approval required by Code and subject to t following conditions: he f 10 All construction shall follow the site plan, date- stamped February 4, 1992e The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the community Design Reviev Board. The Director may approve rove minor changes. 20 The City Council vaives the periodic reviews, based on the procedures in City code. 2 CITIZENS' COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 26 property owners within 350 feet of the site. There were eight replies. Six were in favor and two had no comment. In Favor Comments 10 The church appears to have done its homework and the construction doesn't affect any property owners except for a little noise. (Kumerow, 548 Willow Lane) 2. The church is a good neighbor. (Morgan, Sun City, AZ) 3. It makes good sense. (Johnson., 2716 Upper Afton Road) 4. Its OK by us. (Boily - Afton Road Clinic, 2716 Upper Afton Road) 5. No problem with Gillespie or the Afton Clinic. (Gillespie,, 27,16 Upper Afton Road) 3 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 3.4 acres Existing land use: Lutheran Church of Peace SURROUNDING LAND USES North. Guertin Pharmacy, Afton Road Clinic and Super America South: single dwellings West: Carver School East: Century Avenue and single dwellings in Woodbury PAST ACTION April 26, 1973: The City Council approved a CUP for a preschool at the church June 14, 1982: Council revised the CUP for the preschool increasing the allowed number of students from 30 to 40. August 12, 1985 and August 13, 1990: Council renewed the CUP for five years. April 12, 1988: The Community Design Review Board approved a 32- square -foot ground sign for the church. February 25, 1992: The Review Board approved the design plans for the proposed expansion. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: C (church) Zoning: F (farm residence district) Code requirement. Section 36-437(3) requires a CUP for churches, to \lutheran.cup (Section 1 -28) Attachments 16 Land Use Plan Map 2. Property Line [Zoning Map 39 Site Plan 4. Proposal Summary 5. Resolution 69 Plans date - stamped February 4, 1992 (separate attachment) 4 LAND USE MAP BATTLE CREEK Q N 5 Attachment 1 s ice• � ♦ ®s � �" ��, ji ��11 � s \ • �� _ w� ws r��...............�._ ���'��� _ 11j1 ell 110111111111111 I'll 111"Aft • viii■ �, "" so ..ai IFO ........ MW IoW MW MM minor arterial ��..... mm - • LAND USE MAP BATTLE CREEK Q N 5 Attachment 1 10 19 10 I& % t 1345 N1 co r, 18 11 in � z 0 13 o Z3 _13 4.4 3 .'r +� . a9= c.. ul 66 .2 e 13 ' 1 10 — ; 1� " Co �4 0 ° 15 14 0 17 16 0 00 11 o o _ 2.w o no 13 S 30 30 J3 5 1 3 30 30 13 5 l 3.5 30 l0 34. ' - 3 - ' AFTON RD. - 14* UPPER I*Jm r per CLIN .5 . SUPER ELEMENTARY �,I CARV 7s AMERICA SCHOOL r 183. _ lzoi F l o rs OL D T. N° �2 SC�� C Sl RE s y . i Luihe.n u.ch of CHURCH (1 5.49ac.) .3.75 ac . 6 110 Z� cc. ?3ac. RAM S E*-r' cou NTY OPEN SPA CE l�l W ?Q4 =a Nwu D►d'a -ioge DJch Elvt. ,N O. N 14 070 b - 24• c 3 > r ticc .6 b Z W I S O ,- - - -- - -- - - -- I PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 Attachment 2 4 N p y ....WEST ..... x S SW Z � _ � _ � _ _ i .330M. 4p at • Ga Q 997 , N Z x • �'•• 997 La ! . • • D �.... • . PRO PARKING - - - AND DRIVEWAY S F U op op i't 1, • -... J. A 1 ` + fJ • "- ,s 997 o. It \ \ fin ` ` Q . x I r e Co V Cal a - p.. 1 1 ' 0 ' ? PROPOSED ADDITION i s N » 70 A • Q I , t . SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 N PROPOSAL SUMMARY .Lutheran Church of Peace is a congregation of the Evangelical Church in America (ELCA). g 1 Lutheran Our membership consists of approximately 50 members primarily from south Maplewood, W y p , oodbury and southeast St . Paul, The congregation was formed in 1956 and has just celebrated it ann e lieu s 35 year e had 2 previous building programs; one in 1959 and one in 1974. The project is to add educational • .space to our facility program, our most ambitious to date had m ' This building , any objectives. Several objectives that would be of conce to the city and the design review board are 1. Unite all three additions to give the finished building n appearance of one structure, g 2 . Design an entrance facing Century Ave. that 'ves all those passing b a welco � inviting � g y mmHg, appearance . 3. Design spaces that would be flexible to offer our facility o th community, Y e 4. A handicap accessible facility. 5. Use materials that require minimal maintenance et are durable. le. 6. Add educational space. Our congregation has been researching, discussing, fundraising g g planning for this addition for 5 ears We be • Y began contacting the City of Maplewood building inspector in October for reliminar ' p y reviews of our plan. We have planned for alternative space to worship n during p ring construction and we have made arrangements for the groups that meet in our building to find temporary lternative space • Y p wring construction. Our timetable is to solicit contractor bids by April 10th. We have planned for ground breaking o occur around t e g he first of May, with the .hope of completion by October 1st or November 1st. Time is of the essence ' we have a preschool that would like to begin classes October 1, 1992* since We have invited our neighbors to review our ro'ect on Sunda february 9th. p y ' In conclusion, we feel our project improves the ro ert benefits w p p Y � fits our community w hich we serve and we ask for your timely ap . Marty Vietoris Lutheran Church of Peace Building Committee - Chairperson January 31, 1992 8 Attachment 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Lutheran Church of Peace applied for a, conditional use permit to build an addition onto the church. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 47 South Century Avenue. The legal description is: That part of Section One (1), Township Twenty-eight _ g ( 28 g ) Range Twenty two (22), described as follows: Beginning at a point Five Hundred Fifty-five (555) feet North of the Southeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of SE 1/4) of said Section One (1) thence North Four Hundred Forty (440) feet ; thence West Three Hundred Thirty (330) feet; thence South Four Hundred Fort (440) feet thence East to t y he point of beginning. Subject to that part taken for Century Avenue, easements of record if any, and to the restriction that no sanctuary or church will be constructed within seventy -five (75) feet of the north property line of said tract. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use ermit follows: p is as 10 The Planning Commission discussed this application on , 199 . They recommended that the City Council said permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearin g on , 199_. City staff published a notice In the paper and sent notices to the surrounding owners as required property qu red by law. The Council gave . everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and resent written stateme t p n s. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use PP e permit for the following reasons: 10 The use would be' located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances, 29 The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 9 Attachment 5 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property because of p Y, excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, g , ration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existin g proposed or ro osed streets 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, p olice and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 79 The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects, Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction must comply with the site plan , date- stamped February 4, 1992. The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearin g and recommendation from the.Community Design Review Board, The Director of Community Development may approve p y pp minor changes. 20 The City Council waives the periodic reviews based on the procedures in City code. 3. Adopted 199 mb\res \lutheran.cup 10 Community. Design Review Board -3- Minutes of 2- -25 -92 approve an a e ent from the applicant, granting the ' City permissi to complete any unfinished work. Boardmember Ho er sec nded Ayes --- Erickson, Holder,. Thompson, Wasiluk b. Building Addition - Lutheran Church of Peace, 47 South Century Avenue Marty Vietoris, building committee chairperson, gave a presentation on this proposal. Dan Gallagher, architect, explained plans for the building addition and site plan revisions. Boardmember 14older moved approval of plans date stamped February 4, 1992, for the building additions and site plan revisions for the Lutheran Church of Peace 47 South Century Avenue. The shall do the following: (1) Repeat this review after two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. (2) Get a conditional use permit from the.City Council. (3) Install stop signs at both exits onto Century Avenue. (4) Install handicap - parking signs for each handicap - parking space.and an address on the building. (5) Submit a grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan for the City Engineer's approval. (6) Screen any new roof -top equipment. (7) Submit cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work not completed.by occupancy. The amount of escrow required shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The City must approve an agreement.from the applicant, granting the City permission to complete any unfinished work. Boardmember Wasiluk seconded Ayes -- Erickson, Holder, Erickson, Wasiluk 7. VISITOR,PRESEN TIONS There we n visitor presentations. 8.. BOARD PRES NTATIONS Boardmem older reported on the February 24 City Council meeting. Planning Commi ssion _3_ Minutes of 3 - 16 - 5 • NEW BUSINESS b Conditional Use Per rmit: 47 S, Century Avenue Church of Peace) ( Luthera n Ken Roberts presented the staff report. Marty Vietoris was 'ec p � t present representing Lutheran Church of plans for this ro Peace and explained . Dan Gallagher, of Gallagher ' g Architects, gave a presentation. Dick Lofgren 2661 M . 7 ayer Lane, asked about sprinkler system requirements for this project, Y Commissioner Fischer move • d the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution granting g g a conditional use permit fora church at 47 South Century Avenue, This ' based on the standards fora permit is subject to t approval required by code and 7 he following conditions: 1• All construction shall follow the site plan, date- stamped February 4,, 1992, The City major changes, after Y Council may approve e g ter a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design ' a ro g Review Board, The Director may pp ve minor changes. 2. The City Council • waives the periodic reviews, based on the procedures in City ode. Y Commissioner Martin seconded nded Ayes Anitzberger, Axdahl Fischer, Frost, Gerke i Pear Si� Ma rtin, Pearson, Rossbach, gmundik, Sinn The motion passed. . .., 42W. ..) MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associat e SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat APPLICANT: A.I.D. Sand & Fill, a c/o Arnt Construction PROJECT. Countryview summit DATE: February 13, 1992 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Aotion bY Council.ej Endorse Modif ie d�.�.. - . Planner ReJecte Date Minnesota Partnership, The applicant is requesting preliminary approval of a 36 -lot, single- dwelling plat called Countryview Summit. It would be on a 16.4 -acre site on the north side of Beam Avenue between Highway 61 and Frank Street. (See the maps on pages 7 -9.) DISCUSSION Lot Sizes All the lots meet or exceed minimum City standards, including shoreland regulations. The proposed average lot size is 15,042 square feet. Grading, Drainage and Trees The City Engineer will be requiring several changes to the grading and drainage plan to route most of the storm -water run - off from this plat to the pond on Outlot A. The developer's plan would allow some of this water to drain onto adjacent properties. This was a complaint of some of the residents on Frank Street. There are few trees on the site because of previous excavation. The developer would have to remove most of these trees to grade the site. City Code requires the replacement of any large trees that the developer removes. Street Length The developer is proposing Duluth Street as a temporary dead -end street, about 1350 feet from Beam Avenue. (See his letter on page 11 *) Section 30-8(b)(3) of the City Code requires the developer to limit cul -de -sacs to 1,000 feet, unless no alternative is possible. There is an alternative. The proposed plat shows an Outlot B for a future Lydia Avenue going to the east at the end of Duluth Street. This street would eventually connect Highway 61 and County Road D. (See the land use plan map on page 10.) Until the County constructs this street, the City should allow the developer to construct a driveway to Highway 61. There is a haul -road for Mr. Frattalone's mining operation there now. The developer would have to upgrade this road to meet Fire Code standards. If the developer cannot do this, the Cit y should require the developer to plat all 11 lots beyond 1,000 feet from Beam Avenue as an outlot. Cul -de -sac Design The developer is proposing cul -de -sacs that are different from the standard City cul -de -sacs. The proposed cul -de -sacs have a 31- foot -wide strip of pavement going around a center island. The whole cul -de -sac is in a tear -drop shape. The standard Maplewood cul -de -sac is a 120 -foot diameter circle for the right -of -way and a 100- foot - diameter circle of pavement. The City En ineer is g recommending that the developer redesign these cul -de -sacs to conform to the standard Maplewood design. He feels the center islands would create an unnecessary complication for snow removal and maintenance. Removing the center islands would also allow the developer to shorten the cul -de -sacs by about ten feet. Several residents on Frank Street requested this to provide more setback between their homes and the new homes. RECOMMENDATIONS Approve the Countryview Summit preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions being completed before final plat approval: 1. The developer revising the cul -de -sacs for the approval of the Director of Community Development showing standard Maplewood cul -de -sacs without islands. The developer shall shorten the length of the cul -de -sacs as much as possible without losing lots. 20 The City Engineer approving final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans. The drainage and utility plans shall include a five - foot -high, vinyl -clad chain link fence at the high water mark around the p and in outlot A. The developer shall revise the drainage and grading plans to direct most of the storm -water run -off to the pond on Outlot A. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook, 3. The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan. The Director must approve this plan before an grading Y g g begins or the City approves the final plat. 4. The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be 10 feet wide along the front and rear property lines and 5 feet wide along the side property lines. 2 5. The City Engineer approving a signed developer's agreement and escrow for any uncompleted public improvements, driveway to Highway 61 or landscaping and tree planting required by the City. This agreement shall also include the installation of four street lights, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 6. Do one of the following: a. Show all lots farther than 1,000 feet from Beam Avenue as an outlot until the County connects Duluth Street and Lydia.Avenue to Highway 61; or b. Provide a driveway and public easement from the end of Duluth street to Highway 61. The driveway must meet Fire Code standards. The developer shall put posts and a chain across the drive at Duluth Street, 7. Grant to the City a temporary 100- foot - diameter cul -de -sac bulb easement for Duluth Street, unless the developer constructs a driveway to Highway 61. 810 Show a drainage and utility easement on Lot 13, Block 2 for any area planned as part of the storm -water pond. 90 The developer getting easements for all off -site grading and utility work. 109 Show outlot B as a public right -of -way for Lydia Avenue. lie' Change the name of Countryview Court or Countryview Circle to a name acceptable to the Director of Public Safety. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. 3 CITIZEN.COMMENTS On December 12, 1991, staff surveyed the 45 property owners within 350 feet of the site about the proposal. The City received 18 responses. 9 were for the plat, 4 had no comment and 5 were against the proposal. For 1. We believe this proposal will add value to our already nice neighborhood. (Deyoung - 2964 Carey Heights Drive) ) 2. It is adjacent to my property and it is consistent with current development. (Galland - 2994 Carey Heights Drive) 3. Single family homes would provide more for the community than multiple dwellings. (Sanft - 2925 Frank Street) 4. Looks like a great development and should add to the tax base for the community. (Maplewood Toyota) 50 I would rather see single- family homes than multiple.. p Y homes. As long as the value of these new homes stays consistent with the neighborhood, I have no objection. 6. Unless-the density of houses exceeds that of the immediate neighborhood, I am in favor of the proposal. The owner should be able to do as he wishes as long as he complies with the applicable regulations. (J. J. Brooksbank) Against 1. It needs a road going to Highway 61. (Baughman - 1200 Beam Avenue) 2. The area at the end of Duluth Court is too close to the house and lots - a big hill is involved next to 2908 and 2916 Frank Street. (Owner - 2900 Frank Street) 39 Future problems with the neighbors. (Guldens) 40 See the letters on pages 12 and 13. Staff comments on these letters: Lots 18 and 19, Block One meet all City Codes. Condition one of the staff report recommends shortening the cul -de -sacs as much as possible. There are no parks planned in this area. Lots 12 and 13, Block Two meet all City Codes. Lot 12, next to Mr. Shane's home, is 150 feet deep, 4 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Area: 16.4 acres Existing land use: Undeveloped. a ravel it, p g p The owners had used the site as Property Owner: A. I. D. Sand and Fill (Arnt Construction) SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Undeveloped property planned LSC (limited p service commercial). East: A single -famil home Y at 1241 Beam Avenue that the Cit resident' Y has zoned R -1 (single-family ial). Also there are the west property lines of undeveloped properties that front on Highway 61. The City as Y planned these Properties BW (business warehousing) and has zoned them M -1 (light manufacturing), South Single-family omes across rosy Beam Avenue, West: Single- family homes in Kohlman Lake Overlook Number 1 and on the north side of Beam Avenue. HISTORY This site was mined for man years before ' regulating Y Ye ore the City started re g g it. In 1977, the City approved a conditional use permit that regulated Mr. Ar nt's mining on the site. One of the conditions limited the mining o a maximum g ximum of ten years. On December 10, 1990, the Council changed the land use plan for the area west of Highway 61 and north of • Beam Avenue, including this site. The Council changed the land and .use plan designation for this site from RM (residential medium density) to RL resi ' dential low density) and the zoning from F farm - ( residential) to R -1 (single residential). The Council alignment of .a cil also changed the proposed road connecting County Road D and Beam Avenue that ran through this site. This road Count. R ad is now shown connecting y Road D and Highway 61, north of Gulden' s Restaurant. PLANNING Land Use Plan Designation: RL residential ' - ( low density) Zoning: R 1 (single- dwelling residential Proposed Density: ) Pro P ty: 2.2 homes per acre 5 kr \memo73.mem (4-2-9) Attachments 10 Location Map 20 Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Kohlman Lake neighborhood land use plan map 4. Proposed Preliminary Plat 5. Letter: Nicholas Arnt (2 -6 -92) 6. Letter: Trembath - 2908 Frank Street 7. Letter: Shane - 1241 Beam Avenue D � s WDNAIS HFIGHM CO 19 RD D R Q ....... .. . ............ .............. W 4 T w ...... vo z ........ ARM X 60 •Ir / / i� AM IrOhImm Lak N\l uir L POND KOHLMAJ AV North W Hazelwood _j CO -" Pk C 7D 23 fiq in PALM PALM Y . 1 . t r : CONIN R N R Hervost I PLAZA CIR ..-..CT A .1 V MON 2 ALVERA PIR (1) CONNOR AV MO NT AV sELLcREsr DR 4 DEA U VI L L r DR OKS 6 WRIDIAN OR 22. 41- SEXTANT 01 Four 0 60 < XTAN T AV $#03 )12 GERVAtS AV GCRVA PKWY 'U GMWWt V AV z VIKING DR 8 HERREN COPE CT COPE AV Knuckle Head L. a** Keller LOA'* :. ' .a µ.VtKtIVC;' O ��,,, J AV LARK LARK CO RD Z LAURIE 2 LAURI z W CT. Or LELAND RD A CO RD AND- woodF*4- a] ST -At JUNCTION BURKE AV w A 0 w Pk ELDRIDGE 0 (1) CHAMBER Sr AV 0 URKE 0 ftbinhood 49 co 0 ELDRI E AV Loke NT it 3: 4 4. . I H 60 w SKILLMAN K AV /� n K NW D_ sc AV j 6ILLM A Ot G AV , 0 • 0.000004 SITE LO CATION MAP 4 7 Attachment 1 •{ F `� - - - -- • ' � •� ism � ' • • �� 'i ►; N 24o C � - — VI 0 04 (7) bi � i M A Cur� _ \' _LLJ .9 3 sc I 1174 ' u l �� • I I LA a 117$ R. 0 - �� 2999 t • �' 4 2998 . �;... •�:.��M:�;�� ffi 3000 .'.' : :: : :: :.•.::••' ' 2993 ..........,.. ............. 3 2988 i 8 n L _ •�•'�_•=- �� ::::::::::::::: 2 994 .............. .............. �' 2976 2989 � ,•.• .............. 3 . • 2990•. ............. 'gyp \ ':: : : : : :: �• : : : :: : J ................. 2980 ............... S l; • : : : : :: : : : : : : :: i 37 •.•............ S � W C, �. Z k '•• ::.•: •' : : :. • • .. . . 272 ��.•:.• :.•.': : :: :. �.•:::..: • 3 � • � � si e 2964 �:�•:.•:.•.• •.:•: ::::: :: :::: con ..................... y �� ••.•.•••••.•....... •' 1201 - .................... .................... .................. W $ 3 r IV 2909,2901- Y -... . 1185 1193 .'•' 1 !� 400 1 7j s . 104 / I �* I �/ 2 11 �o ♦ '� K o , aA ev / 0 r7C 7S / 1.74 sc 41 2889 " l ■ Det Irl to" •/W in 01 A - - - - • . wl I ' e�# 5 tea! _ %% 4 ]2 -� P. n' G'>�S•+85 � • t3 w 2873 3.�4 st. lom • A._ /sh MAPLEWOOD TOYOTA ,0 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP >z SITE 8 •fi . S C 2932 .. mm"Op"AwlImp U- a u V s,ja ■ � 306.5 C. ■ 6.06 i o " ti cit � e• c. � -:. . ■ - i C �tI [ Qlo � { L�■ ■ ■ L I -- -- - - - - Q N Attachment 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF • 11'f COUNTR r • SUMMIT' l y f�CAe.E NI FEET • � + • M M r etM eel •.• • � . TYPI Wr elf. go OWW mom I I .•- - -..rs r► �wrw --�. � r... .r am~ �...� 4WWk"ftu"4MuN *OEM IIlT Mt+�• ee+•K Aum AUM Mat mew aftomrt". &" W" IMMMM' A�a N•- liilii� tM R+t1 � " 1 � Aa.. MVP f .'I"mom .Meal~ . f + �• 1;W MEOW 4 i •YReilMwtlt leNNi�f M�1l1lt; M M•M�MnIR w Mi4l R i !T 1MlMfsp AIj� I/i Tr rt /M 9" Mo 1MtrIN, w own vW •NI Near ttl� �R Ir * QI!{/iMN. t Mea[N aM1M1/ 71Mr �Mli AA! M� fta" w N IMF a •tee Ulf "W pMitltill A» 1feN t AIt A � MMAM am #MWW& a* &= "W � 7Ni Ile! i rM�tM/e�le•• was 1wf � �.•• �• wa�wl e iMQ1MM • w i 1 Ir l� f fl s� r r 1 I' L f t t wo= Mo Attachment 3 .. r .. .. -. -... r _. _- �...__ .... a.:.�. +r_ -w•M•. K�r 1�..`_ . . r. rrJ w.�'A _ 1�.. .. - `rdrYti..: r 1aUI161b 'RC1fillL �, . , . •• . interchange �� f K inci a1 arterial _ J • i • R1 a ._ CSC ,� • a RI o mom • mom• so R1 • • • 3 ' �+ FUTURE STREET to �►�� u.... r • • minor a� ial� � tt� • i ' •• BEAM AVE R1 .• O f +� cERV�rs. R1 ...a •. �tl c�o� , minor arteri ; ..._...,. ONOMM M a or o L ANE B " - e RM v A= 1 —. • • . L • ' 3 •"'' BW 0 am slow • • • arterialnterchange 1 .. • interchan a •• r . • • •• r . 01r ��. op Revised: 124643 Kohlinan Lake* - 11/1/90 ma le wood DD LAND PLAN 12/31/30 dkw^ E� ON8 ORKO USE • 6/10/91 SITE 10 Attachment 4 ARNT CONSTRUC O.N COMPANY I P.O. BOX 224 HUGO, MINNESOTA 55038 OFFICE: 612/426 -1296 FAX: 612/426 -3760 February 6, 1992 RE: Maplewood, Minnesota Countryview.Summit. Mr. Ken Roberts, Associate Planner City Of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Mr. Roberts: We are requesting that the city allow the construction of a Cut -De -Sac in excess of the 1000' limit stated in the city ordinances for the following reasons: 1. Due to the shape of the parcel we were unable to come up will a street configuration that would allow us to loop the streets back to Beam Avenue. This would be especially difficult with the minimum lot size requirements within the shoreland boundary (15000 SF). 2. By extending the Street and utilities to the north property line it will allow the property to the north access to these improvements when they choose to develop. 3. Because of the cost of the improvements it wouldn't be feasible to plat only 20 lots ( ie grading —ect .) . And therefore plating the remainder of the property .as an outlot until the property to the north develops. 4. There are several streets adjacent to this parcel that have Cul -De -Sac or dead end streets longer than 1000'. We would appreciate your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call. NJA /bea Sincerely, Nicholas J Arnt, P.E. 11 Attachment 5 An Equal Opportunity Employer I i l OBJECTIONS TO THE COUNTRYVIEW SUMMIT PLAT 1. The proposed buildings on lots 18 and 19 of the Countryview Summit plat would be too close to the property lines and houses on lots 18, 19, and 20 of the existing Kohlman Lake overlook to the south and west. A. solution: Eliminate proposed lot 19 on the plat and extend the south line of lot 20 and the north line of lot 21 to meet the exception lots on the Kohlman Lake Overlook plat. All of the rest of the lots in this subdivision have. a much greater setback than lots .18 & 19. S I G 1 , 4 p 2. Building a structure on lot 1'8 of the proposed plat would create an unacceptable change in grade between this lot:, and lot 18 of Kohlman Lake Overlook-. We already have severe erosion and drainage problems in this location. I also see no provisions for drainage easements in this location. solution: Shorten the Countryview Lane cul -de -sac or move it north. I see no reason to have an island in any of the cul -de -sacs on this plat. 3. No provision for park or open space areas. In the past 5 years over 80 lots have been developed on the west side of highway 61 between Beam Avenue and Highway 61. An additional 36 lots are proposed.With the trend of developers to cram as many lots as possible into a fixed space I think -it is the obligation of the office of community development to provide for some sort of public recreation area or wildlife open space area in this immediate vicinity. Highway 61 is a definite barrier for both the people and wildlife that live here and something should be done on the west side of highway 61 in regards to an open space area or park. Keller Lake is too far away to be considered an alternative. - re�m�g7N- ZqOF FgjP)AJK 12 Attachment 6 21 d ec e nb ems 1 3 i j 77= /7 - I I v ,Oea,t Kerme�tlt RobeA.t4: Obvi vcc.�.lc�, ih e paopod e anb%yvi Swwu:,i. Clev4O Merut wiU elimi;i;�e con,;ideAa6 e open . ce 0 1 0 0 LuLth a AeAU�Tanl env4 Aorunen&J. cle..te/uoAation p v4 A r mine. Nv mod.4,ica o �an -i-o utA can etZminaie �tAa-C weveA P� c .7 twuLd lihe �o .gee . dice cuave-'ai. Ae joath- end o -X� 4& 114v6,m modifUed -to move the lvwt hoo hvttiexi on -iA etz.Ai. '-dide-.. 4cv&�he� �iiom me. gn tieu 0 Acd a 6avtZeet, eiAeA hed o4 wood �ertce atori af�te weed .4ide o� m ptopeii JUILe W04& eizzuILe a d o� pA.i.vac .�irc.�den�a,L.C6, �'02 t-omna,&on,-Ae tocation. o� Aij hc)u.�e wa.4 noi. o� m citoodin aut uwA dZc�.ied 6 viitagx of-Ac" Ae /te.4idt o7 a dep.- o� i on 64-A i dide'4. M CAO-4ce ,wa.d aoAeA to tl-e.. .4.tAeet and zomey.)Aat�t e".,i and in -the aottea whelt'e Ae C ol. M ewood Jate,& i-n-4,&Ued a -4an �tr At .6 ewe In �acf, baAejn excavation had been CO'M UA..en the 0 e& �o 4e�ocate uk-w iftan&niited S.inceAeCc� t IV /0,4/ ee-ely) /iVie0'r 13 Attachment 7 Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 2 -18 -92 5. NEW BUSINESS a. Preliminary Plat: Countryview Summit Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report for this request for preliminary approval of a 36-lot single - dwelling plat. Nick Arnt, the applicant, said he would work with the City Engineer to address the drainage concerns. Mr. Arnt doesn't feel he should be required to change the natural drainage patterns to accommodate all of the runoff entering Outlot A and the pond, since there is considerable relief on the site. Mr. Arnt also spoke concerning the cul -de -sac design and street access to Highway 61. Mr. Arnt introduced an associate who spoke on the design of the proposed cul -de- sacs. Commissioner Fischer requested the vote be split on this item, voting on Condition 1 separately. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Countryview Summit preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions being completed before final plat approval: (2) The City Engineer approving final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control.and street plans. The drainage and utility plans shall include a five -foot- high, vinyl -clad chain link fence at the high water mark around the pond in Outlot A. The developer shall revise the drainage and grading plans to direct most of the storm.water runoff to the pond on Outlot A. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. (3) The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan. The Director must approve this plan before any grading begins or the City approves the final plat. (4) The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be 10 feet wide along the front and rear property lines and 5 feet wide along the side property lines. (5) The City Engineer approving a signed developer's agreement and escrow for any uncompleted public improvements, driveway to Highway 61 or landscaping and tree planting required by the City. This agreement shall also include the installation of four street lights, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 2-18-92 (6) Do one of the following: (a) Show all lots farther than 1,000 feet from Beam Avenue as an outlot until the County connects Duluth Street and Lydia Avenue to Highway 61; or (b) Provide a driveway and public easement from the end of Duluth Street to Highway 61. The driveway must meet fire code standards. (7) Grant to the City a temporary 100 - foot - diameter cul -de- sac bulb easement for Duluth Street, unless the developer constructs a driveway to Highway 61. (8) Show a drainage and utility easement on Lot 13, Block 2, for any area planned as part of the storm -water pond. (9) The developer getting easements for all off -site grading and utility work. (10) Show Outlot B as a public right -of -way for Lydia Avenue. (11),Change the name of Countryview Court or Countryview Circle to a name acceptable to the Director of Public Safety. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the Director of Community Development may Y P Y waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes -- Axdahl, Fischer, ,Frost, Pearson, Rossbach, Sinn The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Countryview Summit preliminary plat, subject to the following condition being completed before final plat approval: (1) The developer revising the cul -de -sacs for the approval .of the Director of Community Development showing standard Maplewood cul -de -sacs without islands. The developer shall shorten the length of the cul -de -sacs as much as possible without losing lots. Planning Commission Minutes of 2 -18 -92 -4- Commissioner Pearson seconded The motion failed. Ayes - -Sinn, Pearson, Axdahl Nays -- Fischer, Frost, Rossbach b. 1992 Activities Secret Olson presented the staff report and asked directi from the Commission for he 1992 activities listed in their 1991 Annual Report, The Commis ion directed staff t schedule a City tour for early May, iscussed the possi ility of future publishing of land use ma , discussed plan for a future goal- setting session and omotion of a po itive image for the City, c. Commission Dis ussion -Toeng s.Farm Preliminary Plat The Commissione discuss d with staff questions on the upcoming prelimi ry pla request to be considered by the Commission in the ear ture. Commissioner Rossbach stated he has concerns wi h th trees and drainage on the site. 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Comprehensive Plan 4cl4te The Commission rev ewed the latest draft of the Comprehensive Pla and d'rected staff to make the changes for the next mee ing. Commissioner Fr st moved to accept the Human Rights Goal as submitted in t e staff repo from the Human Resource Director. Commissioner /Rossbach seconded The motion passed. 7. VISITOR PR SENTATIONS There we r no visitor presentations. Ayes -- Fischer, Frost, Pearson, Rossbach, Sinn Nays -- Axdahl 8. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS a. February 24 Council Meeting: Commissioner Pearson SUMMARY INTRODUCTION G -3 Mr. Roger Kolstad, representing North Suburban Development Inc., is requesting four approvals to develop the Maple Woods Estates Second Addition subdivision. They are: 16 A change to the City's land use plan from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density) and OS (open space), 2. A street vacation for parts of undeveloped Ripley Avenue, 150 feet east of Lakewood Drive and between Currie and Myrtle Streets. (See the map on page 18.) City staff is recommending that the Council vacate Sterling Street from a point 120 feet south of the North St. Paul border to a P oint 285 feet south of the North St. Paul border. The developer would then have to build a cul -de -sac at this point, making Sterling Street a dead -end street from the north. (See the drawing on page 360 3. A 50 -lot preliminary plat for single dwellings. 4. A change to the zoning map from F (farm residential) to R -1 (single- dwelling residential). This development would be on a 31.6 -acre site that is south of Ripley Avenue, between McKnight Road and Sterling treet. g (See the maps on pages 14 and 17.) DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Change The land use plan on page 15 shows this site planned for RM (residential medium density) uses. This designation is for double dwellings, town houses and small apartment buildings. The proposed RL (residential low - density) land use designation is primarily for single dwellings. I have shown this change in the map on page 16. The homes to the north of this site are also shown as RL on the land use plan. Action by Council: Endorse fJ • `(t Modif i e MEMORANDUM r; R ejected-_-.0 TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Change, Street Vacations, Preliminary Plat and Zoning Map Change APPLICANT: North Suburban Development, Inc. PROJECT: Maple Woods Estates Second Addition DATE: March 11, 1992 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION G -3 Mr. Roger Kolstad, representing North Suburban Development Inc., is requesting four approvals to develop the Maple Woods Estates Second Addition subdivision. They are: 16 A change to the City's land use plan from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density) and OS (open space), 2. A street vacation for parts of undeveloped Ripley Avenue, 150 feet east of Lakewood Drive and between Currie and Myrtle Streets. (See the map on page 18.) City staff is recommending that the Council vacate Sterling Street from a point 120 feet south of the North St. Paul border to a P oint 285 feet south of the North St. Paul border. The developer would then have to build a cul -de -sac at this point, making Sterling Street a dead -end street from the north. (See the drawing on page 360 3. A 50 -lot preliminary plat for single dwellings. 4. A change to the zoning map from F (farm residential) to R -1 (single- dwelling residential). This development would be on a 31.6 -acre site that is south of Ripley Avenue, between McKnight Road and Sterling treet. g (See the maps on pages 14 and 17.) DISCUSSION Land Use Plan Change The land use plan on page 15 shows this site planned for RM (residential medium density) uses. This designation is for double dwellings, town houses and small apartment buildings. The proposed RL (residential low - density) land use designation is primarily for single dwellings. I have shown this change in the map on page 16. The homes to the north of this site are also shown as RL on the land use plan. This change would benefit the existing neighborhood by reducing the allowed density on the site. This means there would be less traffic than if the property developed accordin to the current g land use plan. The proposed project would have only 1.7 units per acre. The current RM designation would allow up to 7 apartments per acre. Some of the neighbors are concerned about Increased traffic from this project, Street vacations Ripley Avenue The City does not plan to build any more of Ripley Avenue in this area. The developer would use the right -of -way that is 150 feet east of Lakewood Drive for an extension of Ripley Avenue. The south half of the part of Ripley east of the extension would become part of Lot 12, Block 3 in the proposed P lat. The north half would go to the school property to the north. The developer would dedicate the south half of the vacated right -of -way, west of Myrtle Street, for park. The north half of this right -of -way would go to the owner of 1807 Myrtle Street and the City (Hillside Park). This would allow the owner of 1807 Myrtle Street to expand without having to provide a 30 -foot setback from Ripley Avenue. The City should keep an easement for trail and park access for the existing trail on this right -of -wa . Y Sterling Street The part of Sterling Street next to the plat is a substandard street with a gravel surface. The standards for a City street include bituminous pavement and concrete curb and utter. The developer needs to g p have Sterling Street improved to build the proposed subdivision. It is not practical to build the section of Sterling Street, south of Lot 3 , Block 4. He would only Y g t one additional lot - Lot 13, Block 3. The City could probably not sustain assessments to the adjacent ro erties if the City P p y built the street. The City Engineer is, therefore, recommending that the City vacate Sterling Street from the North St. Paul border to a point 285 feet south. Preliminary Plat Changing the lots on Sterling Street. Requiring that the developer cul -de -sac Sterling Street means that the developer would then have to realign Lots 2 and 3, Block 4 as shown on page 36. He would also have to drop Lot 13, Block 3. Dropping lot 13 would have several advantages. Most of this lot is covered with trees that could be preserved. This lot would also be expensive to develop. The developer is proposing to serve Lot 13 with a septic system and well. The City Engineer believes that the developer can provide this lot with-public 2 utilities from the east end of Ripley Avenue, between Lots 3 and 4, Block 3. If the Council approves this lot, they should require that the developer show a 20- foot -wide drainage and utility easement along the property line between these two lots and extend utilities to Lot 13, Wetlands and Drainage There are several wetlands on this site. Proposed Outlot A on the plat covers most of the large pond that runs from Sterling Street on the east to North Saint Paul on the north. The State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) protects this p ond. The developer is proposing to keep these wetlands. The developer needs to increase the capacity of this pond so it will follow the City's storm water management plan. He will have to do this by building about a five -foot -high dike on the Sterling Street right -of -way. Trees The plan on page 20 shows groups of large trees (8 -inch or greater diameter) scattered throughout the site. Most of these trees are cottonwoods located on the eastern one half of the site near the large pond. The City considers cottonwoods to be undesirable trees. There are also about 125 large oak trees on the property. The proposed grading plan does a good job of working around the existing large trees. 90 of the 92 large trees that the developer is proposing to remove are cottonwoods. The proposed lot layout should help to preserve most of the large g trees (including the large oaks) on the site. Utilities The developer is proposing to connect the sanitary sewer in the new Ripley Avenue to the existing, private sanitary ewer on the apartment Y p nt property. The developer is proposing this connection between Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 in a 20- foot -wide utility easement. The City should require the developer to change this to a 30- foot -wide easement centered on the property line. The City Engineer stated that a larger easement width is necessar t y o fit in both the proposed water main and sanitary sewer. Since the sanitary sewer on the apartment site is privately owned, the City should require that the apartment owner g ive this sewer to the City along with an easement. The City can then make sure this sewer is properly maintained, since it will serve many homes. Before accepting responsibility for this sewer, the City Engineer wants the developer to document the condition of the line before final plat approval. The developer should also make any necessary repairs and construct gravel drives over the line for maintenance vehicles. K Park Dedication Many of the neighbors have stated that they would like this whole property kept for open space or a park. The City would have to buy this property to do this. The City has not included this site in its' park acquisition plan. The developer is proposing to give the City about 4 of the 31.6 acres for park land. The City is also requiring the developer to ive the City about 5 g Y acres for the pond on Outlot A. There are two areas that the developer plans to give the City for park purposes. The first area is three acres in the center of the plat along the Great Lakes pipeline and along the south property line. This area also includes a 20- foot -wide strip between Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3. This strip would provide access for the residents on the new Ripley Avenue to the proposed park. The second area is between Myrtle Street and McKnight Road along the Ripley Avenue alignment. This area is about 38,200 square feet. It provides a wider public access to McKnight Road next to the existing City trail. .. These two areas would give the apartment residents to the south access to Hillside Park and McKnight Road without them havin g to cut through private yards. These two areas would also provide walking paths for the existing residents to the north. Many of these residents say they are now using this property for walking and observing wildlife and the wetlands. Trails in these locations would be consistent with the trail conce P t that the City approved with the 1969 PUD plan for this area. It is also consistent with the bicycle /trails map in the current and proposed Comprehensive Plans. (See the maps on pages 23 and 24.) The City will be responsible for these areas. The option would be to make the proposed park in the center of the site part of the lots and only require a 20- foot -wide trail easement. Trails The developer should construct the following trails: 1. Over the proposed park, between Sterling Street and the intersection of Ripley Avenue.and Myrtle Street, 2, Between Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 4. This trail would connect the end of Ripley Avenue to the trail in the park. 3. Between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1. This trail would connect the end of Myrtle Street to the trail in the park. 4. From the end of the proposed Sterling Street cul -de -sac to the south end of the dike. I have shown these trails on the map on page 22. 4 The City should require that the developer build these trails with the development. This is so the new ro ert owners see the p p Y trails when they consider buying a lot. The City has had problems before putting in trails in other developments after homes are built and occupied. (The Crestview plats and the Crestview Forest Town Houses are examples.) Residents may object to the future construction of these trails because they were not aware that the City would build them before they bought their homes. Zone.. Chance Staff is recommending- that the City change the zoning map for this site from F (farm residential ) to R -1 (single-dwelling residential). The City has done this with previous plats that had an F zone. This change will prevent the property owners from doing any activities that might be a nuisance (farming or nurseries) to the other neighbors, RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Adopt the resolution on page 31 to change the land use plan for this site. This change is from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density) and Os (open space) . This change is based on the following reasons: a. This change would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plane b. This change would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. c. The City has already planned the homes to the north of this site for RL use. 20 Adopt the resolution on page 32 to vacate the following parts of the Ripley Avenue right -of -way: a. East of a point that is 150 feet east of Lakewood Drive, b. That part between the west line of Currie Street and the east line of Myrtle Street, subject to retaining an easement for trail or park access. This vacation is based on the following reasons: a. It is in the public interest. b. The City does not need this right -of -way. 5 CO The adjoining properties have adequate street access. The developer shall file the vacation resolution with the final plat. 3. Adopt the resolution on page 35 to vacate Sterling Street from the North St. Paul border to a point 238 feet south. This vacation is based on the following reasons: a. It is in the public interest. b. The City does not need this right -of -way. CO The adjoining properties have adequate street access. Approval is subject to retaining a 10 -foot -wide trail easement on either side of the centerline. The developer shall file the vacation resolution with the final plat. 4. Approval of the Maple Woods Estates Second Addition preliminary plat, subject to completing the following conditions before final plat approval: a. The City Engineer approving.final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans. The grading plan shall show the depth and location of the Great Lakes pipeline. The drainage and utility plans shall include a five- foot -high, vinyl -clad chain link fence at the high water mark around the pond in Outlot A. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. b. The apartment owner to the south of this plat must give the City a 20- foot -wide utility easement, which includes ownership of the private sanitary sewer. This easement shall be over the sanitary sewer line from the south line of the plat to the Larpenteur Avenue right - of -way. The.apartment owner must also give the City a right -of -entry agreement to allow City maintenance vehicles to use his private drives. The developer shall build 10-foot-wide gravel drives over the sanitary sewer on the apartment property. The location and design of these drives shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The purpose is to provide maintenance vehicle access to the manholes. The developer shall document to the City Engineer the condition of the private sanitary sewer line. The developer shall document this condition with surveys 6 and television inspections before the existing line is transferred from private to City maintenance. If the City Engineer determines that the private sanitar sewer line is not acceptable for public use, the City Engineer shall approve a repair and reconstruction plan for the line. The City Engineer also may approve another design for serving the site with sanitary sewer if the developer cannot repair or reconstruct the existing line. c. The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan which includes the developer marking all trees which are to be kept on the property during and after development. The developer will be held to the City of Maplewood's tree ordinance for replacement of trees that are taken down as per the ordinance. The Director must approve this plan before any grading begins or the City approves the final plat. d. The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be 10- feet -wide along the front and rear property lines and 5- feet -wide along the side property lines. e. The City Engineer approving a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, for all required public improvements, erosion control and tree planting. This agreement shall include, but not be limited to: (1) The placement of temporary fencing, during construction, around woodlots and trees that the developer will save. (2) The installation of street lights in four locations, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. (3 ) The installation of the following eight- foot -wide bituminous trails, subject to the approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation: (a) Over the proposed park, between Sterling Street and the intersection of Ripley Avenue and Myrtle Street. (b) Between Lot 7, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 4. ( c) Between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1. (d) From the end of the proposed Sterling Street cul -de -sac to the south end of the dike. 7 ( 4 ) The complete reconstruction of Rip ley Av enue p Y between Lakewood Drive and Myrtle Street. The reconstru shall include concrete curb and gutter that shall extend to the north end of the curb returns on the north side of Ripley Avenue. These curb returns are for the intersections of Ripley Avenue with Lakewood Drive and Myrtle Street. Y le ( 5 ) The construction of a cul -de - sac from the North St. Paul border to serve Lots 1- Block 4. f. Drop Lot 13, Block 3 and realign Lots 1- r g 3, Block 4 around the pro posed Sterling Street cul -de -sac. g. The developer shall revise the plat to show a 20- wide. drainag and Utilit foot ity easement centered along the property line between Lots 3 and 4 Block 3 if he decides to bring sanitary ewer ' B Y this way to Lot 13, Block 3. h. Deed Dutlot A to the City. i. Revise the plat to show a 20- foot -w' ' ide extension of the park between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1. Rearrange g the lot widths as needed to meet Code requirements. jo Change the Utility easement ent between Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 to a 30 foot - wide drainage and Utilit centered on the property easement p p y line. k. Drop the drainage easements for the and h 9 and 16 p s on Lots 6 through , 17 and 18, Block One from the final plat. 10 Submit recordable deed restrictions to t • he City with the recording fees. These deed restrictions are to prevent the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the Great Lakes pipeline. (This effects Lots 1 - 6 and Lots 22 27, Block 1 and Lots 1 - 7 1 Block 2). The developer . shall. tell the purchasers also p hasers about the pipeline. m. The developer shall remove from the • site all existing debris on the site from previous construction, including any existing foundations pipes debris, � p p or loose n. Grading shall.be limited on the development s' the areas p site to only that need to be graded for the location of home pads, streets, utilities or e requirements as drains put forward g p rward by the City Engineer. 8 o. Cooperation should be arranged.between the City of North Ste paul and Independent School district 622 pertaining to any common. drainage problems which need to be resolved due to this development. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. 50 Approve the resolution on page 34 to rezone this property from. F ( farm residential) to R -1 t single - dwelling residential)* This rezoning is based on the findings required by ordinance I and that the R -1 zoning is consistent with the proposed change to the City's land use plan. 9 CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the 120 property owners within 350 feet of the site. There were 59 replies. 10 were for the proposal, 46 were against and 3 had no comment, Those in favor had the following comments: 1. Developing the land with sin le family homes ' g y 1s an idea dea as long as our property is kept p rivate, Lane, #57.) (Monette - 1712 McKnight p p g 2. It is a viable alternative to what has been ro os - p p ed in past years. ( Donatell 1720 McKn Lane, #49.) 3. As I understand, if it fits with the PUD concept. We already have apartments, town houses and a commercial corner and there is room for single- family housing, ( Malley - ht Lane g 1722 McKnight , #47. } 4. The additional tax revenues and boost to the local economy jobs and materials. (Walters - 1723 McKnight Lane 46 g � # •) 5. I like the idea of single family homes oin u - going P• (Wiedl - 1775 McKnigh Road N.) 640 I would prefer to see the land developed as single ' ' p g family rather than multiple family units* (Gorman - 1782 McKnight Road N.) g 7. We prefer single family homes. We hope the streets would be developed to take care of the traffic flow. (Kotula - 1837 Lakewood Drive.) 8. It will help the project is a goon woodland. It is in the building. Because of the number them as follows: bus lines to extend out this way; housin concern is one. M Y that we retain more becoming scarce because of its destruction (Sister Raler, Saint Paul's Prior of comments in opposition I have summarized 19 Keep it as a natural, wild, open land or as ame merit will result g preserve. This development ult In the loss of wildlife habitat. 2. Make it into a park. 3. Opposed to the loss of trees. 4. It will endanger the wetlands that need rotectio p n. 10 5. It will create drainage problems. 6* It will increase traffic, 7. There is a traffic problem at Ripley by Myrtle at the access to Hillside Park. Staff response: The City is requiring the developer to improve Ripley Avenue between Myrtle And Lakewood. This will include the improvement of the intersection of Ripley Avenue and Myrtle Streets. This _improvement will make the edges of the streets clear and should make for improved traffic flow. .8 There will be trespassing and vandalism on the town house property (including the outdoor pool. Staff response: The police chief stated that the construction of homes with private yards would decrease vandalism of the town house property. 9 See the letters on pages 25 through 30. REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Area: 31.6 acres Existing land use: Undeveloped with basement foundations in the west one -half of the site. A Great Lakes pipeline easement goes through this property from south to. the north and west along the Ripley Avenue alignment. Property Owner: Paul B. Kelly SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Single - family homes in Maplewood and North Saint Paul Maplewood Middle School and Hillside Park. East. Sterling Street and Hill- Murray High School. South.: The Maple Woods Estates Apartments and the Maple Woods Town Houses, West: The Maple Woods Town Houses and McKnight Road, PLANNING Proposed Density: 1.68 homes per acre. 11 Lot Sizes: The average lot square feet. This is large square feet) that are to the City Code requires at least width for each lot. All of standards. SITE HISTORY size in the proposed plat is 16,390 r than the lot sizes (12,000 - 16,058 north of the proposed plat. The 10,000 square feet and 75 feet of the proposed lots meet or exceed City May 15, 1969: The City Council approved a conditional use permit for a 80 -acre planned unit development (PUD),, It included all the land between McKnight Road and Larpenteur Avenue and between Ripley Avenue and Sterling Street. This PUD was comprised of 146 town houses, 540 apartments and five commercial buildings. The commercial buildings were for a gas station, professional offices and shops at the corner of Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road. The approved PUD plan is on page 23. One of the permit conditions was about the timing of the phasing of the PUD. This timing gave the developer until October 30, 1976 to finish the buildings in Phase 2. This phasing plan also gave the developer until October 30, 1977 to start the buildings in Phase 3. The developer did not meet either of these deadlines so the PUD expired for the undeveloped areas. October 8, 1970: The City Council gave final approval to the building plans for the apartments. August 3, 1972: The City Council approved the final plats which divided the PUD into major lots. The plat also divided one of the major lots into 72 town house lots. This approval was subject to several conditions. It stated that the original plan of a pathways system for the area still stands. January 1974 - March 1977: House Association took many between the town houses and association wanted to build it. The association erecter court action by the City to PUBLIC WORKS The City and the Maple Woods Town actions about the building of a fence the apartments. The town house a fence, but the City did not approve I an illegal fence, which required have the association remove it. In reviewing the utility and grading plans, the City Engineer will require the following: 1. The developer shall remove all existing sanitary and storm sewer manholes and pipes from the plat area. The developer also shall remove all existing water main from the proposed right -of -ways and within 30 feet of house pads. The developer shall bulkhead the remaining abandoned water main or remove it in entirety. 12 2. The developer shall connect the water main extensions from Currie Street, Myrtle Street and Ripley Avenue to the water system to the south in casing pipes. The developer shall extend the . casing pipes from the right -o f -way line to the south line of the plat. The casing pipes will protect house foundations and provide for maintenance if the water main breaks. 3. The developer is not proposing to use the existing private ponds on the south and west boundaries of the plat for public right -of -way drainage. Therefore, the City will not require the developer to'easements over these ponds The City does not want to accept the maintenance liability for these ponds. The developer shall provide drainage through these ponds with the standard City rear and side yard drainage and utility easements. 4. The proposed pedestrian trail along the south property line of the plat partially runs through two ponds near the south east corner of the site. The developer shall get all easements and required approval to grade into the ponds. This is to create a steady and reasonable grade on the trail from Sterling Street to the park in the center of the plat. kr /memo7 l . mem (13-29) Attachments 1. Location Map 2, Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plan Map (Existing) 39 Hillside Neighborhood Land Use Plan Map (Proposed) 4. Property Line /Zoning Map 5, Property Line Map (.Street Vacation) 6. Proposed Maple Woods Estates Second Addition Plat 79 Proposed Grading Plan (with tree inventory) 8. Proposed Utility Plan 99 Proposed Preliminary Plat with Staff Comments 10* Approved 1969 PUD Plan 110. City Bicycle /Trails Plan (page 15 -10) 12. 12 -26 -91 letter from Klitzke's 13 12-23-91 letter from Charles Quistad 14. 12 -27 791 letter from Georgene Karpiej 15. 12 -20 -90 letter from Lucy Paschke 164 Plan Change Resolution 17. Street Vacation Resolution - Ripley Avenue 18. Zoning Map Change Resolution 19, Street Vacation resolution - Sterling Street 20. Drawing of Sterling St. lots 21. Petition 22. Memo and EAW form 23. Planning Commission minutes 13 NORTH SA /NT PAUL 29 ( B 4 AHOLLOW AY AV 120 WISidl W 5 cc J !- r k ♦. Y a AV Ar . ............... LARPE NTEUR AV LAJ Q T29 N R 22w. 10►A HO AV Q 14 �- sc Q 23 ♦ 24 .. h j (1) CURR iE ST 8 A aSK a AV (2) MYRTLE CT p N :: I MICHAEL DR L �SSi 2 REBECCA DR (2 ) 3 PINE TREE DR 3 4 4 BIRCHV/EW DR Iw�Dro�r R� 2 PA _Y N..! OR S low �• BE LANA Cr S 0►AK N/L L T S PINE TREEDR G _ -- 6 BIRCH TREE DR / ANTELOPE i114Y ANGELA 7 ROLLIN41 NUS OR 2 AAWERJACK LA .AF' 'r+awirie — • t MICKEY % 61 jZA� 3 BEAVERDALE RO p IVY _. Ay e.:::: 4 BOBCAT LA ELNW� LA 5 COt/GER LA �• � p r � - 68 r 1 h Y 12 1 � � 31 on •— ..� - 10 HANTHQRNE AV 31 68 ST GER�►�� Soso 0 NOL ITV 4 BBO'M6� � � V O ' o a P* 5: LvA �* . W � LOCATION MAP SITE 4 N Attachment 1 14 s L....... .1,1. :' • ' t,. fill �i1►111 1.. -._.- - e - .: /,......t•• �� ice'" -++ +' r— _ r / . r 1 • p.r�� ' V . ,_ o r col! c #or u ] 1 oway Os • 'GN R l •_ L i R m ..� • .. ' h ...... .. ............ .............. ma'or arterial Larpenteur 1 L SC' OS R m 3 , • Mao . i o 6W R M 1 1 � � C LAND USE MAP Rm= residential medium densit (EXISTING) OS -open space .....��`< SITE N 15 Attachment 2 RM TO RL LAND USE MAP Rl=r- esidential low density Rm= residential medium densi (PROPOSED) OS =open space Attachment 3 4� N JEW ` ,, ril j��i11t1i ji�illi r 11111!1 - � -,� i � ��1 a► s g ; N1 1 v I f RM TO RL LAND USE MAP Rl=r- esidential low density Rm= residential medium densi (PROPOSED) OS =open space Attachment 3 4� N Is ■ ■=— " "'" " AwLm HOLLOWAY AVENUE1 g� 1 qg IV tall,`!. 1 27•t. 4) . c W 2 4 C�3 .tam t3 IZ '11 tC� 9 b 7 -- ' S;; ' � M.a. •� • N: C 27 cc 3 (" 1 W. NORTH = 11 t o p: STS PAUL 1 �. _ 1 � 4 M h (y<) , 8 �' GI•e. ► cl� , HILLSIDE .�. , W 2c ) C ,e _ 3 41 A PLEWOOD� PARK , h: �► 3� =' S n �,� J MEADOW �►�' a '` .; t MIDDLE SCHO 46*) .:, ,�_ .�40 f.* s Is (64 DL ' ('�'�► • is c�� L.14 i,'"�3 : 04 2 (3 ,.0 1 0 2 «�4 1828 �3. ��>•, :� �� : c 7 R3 1817 ; 1831 1 d " as, .fr . ,,�• 8V ryY - <.6 i82 { 7 ` ��� 7 6 4 KMO1 -1 i f2 1820 1821 1818 + ;�? �� s CLt,C R. i low �1815� Y 1$14 1 � � .�. RIFLE •� �� 1806 ••� 180? `" X09 r�s ,s. � �F KN LL WLi XJ6 mi 1848 • ��. _ 244 (Y► et N o IP A 248$ It ~• .Y.'. �:• . trill • r ... .. ........ .1.•: ::.:.......:....... ...... L EY Z f 1 t �. r. t •.Y .'i :� d. .f . _l f• 1 '•'s': :ti a. . . .......... N �N Y. 'i �f �• i e :•. . .•� ': 1 .,y 1 . ....... ........ v: . ♦�� } 7f�:• ': .r 1 1. / tip•: J }:• • u .. W / K 1 1 ::•':'!� \ti R w m 40. 9 ....... .. . ..... .. ....... . . .. .. .. ...... .. } 1 •.v:•: 'r .e. N' N s .•1•r •.t' h H •.•: • h Hi L M 1 R . . A .Y .:Y n I: •M N Lu HI H S fN • ti r • a h f d » 1 ...... SCH C l M Y 1 .Y• o 11. &t 10 : Iv: M \ f t, w f <J PUD I Ix f �z) i' + HILLS b /// + ��� W �f , 2 1 �„ , EWOOD APA F CENTER R7MENT�► R3 E 1 1 o 1 % , _ _ a _ .. 6 A D AC►fTrf 11<1 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE Q N 17 Attachment 4 17 - � (S3) S � ) 5 7) 7) ro ------- PARK 14 7 (4 7) rr l UJ 8 Ix 4 0 2 9 9 10 ... ........ ............ .................... W;- f PLAT SITE J % Co.) f66 4- OWL. dO A SS lk r ILI v � ~ O It 4" 414 U It U ti S t l ll A-4 ilp 3C 0 w 7 Ada: • 1 STREET VACA TION 18 Attachment 5 4 - � v P S � STREET VACA TION 18 Attachment 5 4 _ , ..M r. - ......, ., ....,n..., -.- ..,n,.....,,.rn,...•r- ..... � : ....,«•...,r, .• «. ..A.,. e . . ... r w........,.. - - �.+N,. -... r ...- ,,.,:M.rs�.uwx....wm . ,.+ ..... ............ -, p ... . �.. ,,..... :mss- _sx�...r , + ...- ••..•,.nom..+.... .. _.- ...:_L _..::.:__..,.__� -:� �_, _ .. T.^17a" .n .r,?^_rr »«». .re ....m. �vaa .. L._ �. �._° t__,--- --- _- _�___�_�'- �___.�.._.�...�. _-'-'-- 1---.�_�.�2� L � °.^. <�.�::� ^'^ � �__.�. ... ,..^+ . ,.. ».r:+t?as... . .?�.,�'�a'a4». .. _..... ,... ,... .. ... Ken. - : 11 C+ C ^^ + ' /see =. Cm :Fr�! .....• fy:i. '1JIr 8It v,f)Ak � } IJ..• I. 1l�W¢�t1 ��'W� • � � � � ,..�••iri�\ •t� �� r1� �. i.- • L:�♦, �� �� • 1 � �♦ e1 I , 1 1 J 11 1 � � � 1 � il\ • 1 •..�• • i Ii . r 1\ • \ ♦♦ `,� ♦� I l 1 `♦ • / Iql�, 1 ,� \ �� � � 1 1 � 1 • �` ; 1 1 W •� � jN � •� ��', • / '• r�.r it , /.ft �. 1 � �.. ♦``, \,` � • r6•I �\ r� r • �� �' . r� 1 ` -� ^ \♦ ; �J t , \ � �.�!)f t--'^ •'• f .•r��I�eL i � •.� i� •• . /V .•••i \ ` �,�� G �f , ♦ �• . •� -,•'lr •1`•,.�`7i i ♦ \; •, i 1 ; � ew•e�� i� ' • 1 i ��ll'M -• \` •, •\ ��•.�,� '• - r , ♦ \ ., \.�•♦ � 1 1 t1 P •� • . ir• .,.Ir• •� /•• 7� a � M ♦�` 111 / 1 LOCATION MA! ---� - i -- Preliminary Plat. Of MAPLE DS ESTATES SECOND ADDITION M. WOO _ city of MAPLEWOOD; Ramsey county LEGAL USUPTIN - 1 / .• , ►•1 F_ • '•� HILLSIDE PARK tMep. ..MAKE woods ESTATES. R AMS" C•Irwy, MrrNStlt. � 1• `t •• 1 • - s. a. "3 r r • 00 1 1 \•►�` ;•' ?1!11!"' � • � ���� • •� +. I II 1 , -. `• \i '..j ♦ 1 r . • 1 111 w - t. ; , �,�' e WAF-V AFT 1 •. , IMe1 •'�• '� (1 ji1 • ��" Ill 1 C /N.► , 1 11 • 1 `wti`r ,}�� 1 X11, h 111 ,• �',, .•'• / Ig 1 lo '1 / 1'11' 1 • • :y 1 !` � ` • we1� •� ` ' t`i 1 t� . `, +1. .�: •Ails -. - 10/11 1•w 1 1 �- I � i .,• ; rr , • _ 94M AM SET6ACKS TYK EASEMENTS • - J 1 1 � i •t 1 rr w I er 1 1 1 11 AfAIttT srAtrr . - •. •._- _ •. , !V � • /' 11/1• • �. !� \ .♦ •• •' ••• •�• ••••�•• • • • � \ r ��\ . ' •'- �'i-'u'. •- .. �1 '`set _ 1 - � • ' • t' r �� i. `-• ♦• ` ::�� : �: ;:� '�•• �, %•::. +y �,( 1 OIL • ` •.Y ` i. 1 ♦• / ti• ! �I, • • t • ' �•� I ,� ' ., 1 1 ,, .:•:v� :•• `,N/�6r 1 S '�� . �'� �6 � :. • , .,, NN . ! .f • •r � I. • tom - • ��•: �.: : ::••••�'.••:��- •••�:• •� ;;, ■ ■ � 'tt �j , � .' �, i' 1/��25" 24 , •`.; `•'� .' • h ;" �. � 1. � % '; • _: �' ,�� 1. *.:::•:::::; :::: :::� 7! . ,.�� V +"1.14 ti��' ' �i�• / * ' ,,• //)��,��\ /] •• y� ''' '�'''''''�'' ` ♦� MIS Z 3� ® `\ ./ �•�, • , ter � % �L� : -'�G/' �; � � , •r y. •• • 9l �!� •r}/•ilNA11•: •.� _.. � ' I. Z V• - -•\ " • `, • .• . 1 i , ,'• ` 1 1 •♦ ., zo it I ; 4• -- • g •1 11 / � � - � � r ee l . • .Jr.. tl >j:: :. � � SZ ./ q �• 6 / /.. • caper. WETLANDS Land Allocation 0wr9 Fenlft Wa— 10.0 qaN Parll 5.01 Apra MIIdNNW a11e•11 3JA Apra Jett Acre{ TNM al Ail Ape.. Aeersse leg Aims . IA JW Iv !! i - - -- — - yir1 - North Scales 1 inch s 100 Feet Owner & Developer - , th Suburban Development Co. c/o Mr. Jack Menkveidt P0. Bop 34 ON". MII Sltae V. 756.6000 Ares: I I. /t er;op ere M ••r •tr• •�i /YI•I t. ri o••/4r A pAe see re /.le .,t/J6Ie or..., •ter• / 0461 /•de•1 Nor. of fArVIANvV4 J. C0al•Yt i* 1tevel it t led 4. MI/,J *holes ti %1 1•*p ekr•l4•I A ® tlbn•ltr ♦rs�•!cl ekwobse �. efi••eles �••eel:•l1 •Ptwl'iel' efowt - W. P. t iddy •nl'i 611e:nt/ / C.ly •/ w+ Idle. � /rte/I. I. %►• /s N /i / %/r iw 4 eNe.weel frro^ A. /viN•41 /. /+/y fold tws. P. Mel P41 •rre • All A.-As AJl JI pelr,a/ •:,vAr /e•.:+ A/e It 06we%Ir • W hb per ee,l1 !t. t•rre•1 1,I•rwf N Art I le•111 W" w e% W.V. eru 6•rel•e •• ••. •.ewer ~ Her 1 e. e M li•I�M•re Iele In•.w• i 40 oft om� Atir:tl*# J44 tI E. q. qUo t SONS, INC, cAA,a sJ/avEYOQr R /f 0 lerin /on d v(. ME. i vk pint , Mioncro/o Awl r ItAh we 7,00.535S LOCATION MAP •• : � : — Preliminary Grading Plan O ( With Tree Inventory and Preservation Measures ' North MAPLE WOODS ESTATES SECOND ADDITION sees City Of MAPLEWOOD; Ramsey county E .•..MUM_• ••w.1 �.Y. �1 wr • �1 I �= • LM 1, elol Y I. MA o.lno.r LE WOODS WAVE& �w•«rral•rr�•�•a�rww•r�r.••as r % Camp MS1•MeW owl •,... �• / /•.� • r •• / • j 1, yy,. • .•♦. wU•w woo • �• sil:i.l•.itt:•r �.Ir 11 V A .- I ts —Itl .r,,,rl • •. /�/1.` _/ /J I•..:..1.1 / I/ � a MtJ I I • W • I ••+ • 1 �' t f t L/ i) is is / /t � 11 /� r. .•_ /lit •j•�f '/`I/C /a j � • �``� Aral •'try : i � �� 1 j / �� � 1/ . . � ! t � � t M\ �• 1�' ~ S � �• � � ,.. '� ��• ~\ s ` r` � •a 1 •• ♦ 1` \� •• • 1 ♦ • t- ' 1 1 • 1 • 1 I'.W ••� / w'i�. 1� .r •• -.� , • � a 1 r1 •\ / i •♦ •,� • 1 .. �� • • { • (` •t tNJd'JII'Id -� • • ��✓ ' �.,r�i. j ••sr,. 1♦ ��\� � sdu t/ — - - _ • a� Saab: !Inch . •t 1, t �� J a i 1 APP-9 •�- 1. . _ -� ' % —��:• ♦ 100 Feat tl a•• • ` • � i ,• s' _� \ ♦` , i 1 , .` ''; i • 1 • • i i / i - -• I 1 �• � -- ; I ' I � +• ' • ' � � •� ! -_ � �` .Oai ♦,- :a� • �• �� • !�� w1N ••• • ♦ • • : ••1 ».4 w� _ •. - • `` • _ • 1 _ _ J .f' ..., •�•' • 1. _ ,\ ._ ��; as 1 F _. • . _, � ._-_• - _ / t / •: ... • fib • ��`.. �.• a •`•• • N,r • '� ••, _ • ..' -PtII :•° �• `• si 'j t` ' • ', • _` • •' :• .f �i . ...- .i 1 ..� •- .♦ • `a ♦�,• ♦,���• 1 1, OF x,11' 1�• /� ,,, , -• r •1 iii , - : • 1 w 1I • , • �.J a IV 0 i A ly C+ 0j /r �. ; I� 1;• ''' ?Sl / C. r! '" •t �i! .•I ... 4 1y .. ,•' a1 o � .agg 1I•!! I , �,� Nir'J/:ltF 1 • 1 - i.- a a' + ''+' 1 �i �� i t , ' a '• ,a t ` • •, 0 • ;q� I Owner & Oovelopor ell 11 1 , : ` • { M/ f .11 a 1 • J l : • . • ` \ ,• 1 11 3 \ . , ~� �..f -. � •. •:�.' *. ! • `. � ` ,t. 3•{ / � a 'N' •; �;;; • ».. �;: ,• ,', I , • „� - •, r , 1• : ,� ,.I ; , ;; • O ;a, North. �� 1 1/ L'. \ +� ,�� •. r9; „ l .• A 'c t �,• Suburb Develo ment CO. �1 ► 1 j • ! i •• f : M tiq /",,. '.� .'t • l _ ' ? • 1• `� - I 1 • . ' e ` .'•1 -- - -- ••.••mow. f , ;, �1. 1 �� _' 11; , � ... _•.. • _ , � •; . �,. .j , ./• � ; : .� rraq 1• � � 1 a /O Mr. Jack Menkvoldt 1, ` 91s 1•, c;. ;;p / 6=. y ,� -- F !NG "tr's'!`EN �.• It � •'•, �:' ° a' a �: ` • \' a d9 a a, • � \ i •• 1 / 7 6 r . �•• • �d • , 3�j• ` `a� 1 /0. So. 34ON 1 1 1 • I i 111 ti � �`II ©t /'• N1w• t • �. wI .� S O� ' • A I M do a N ,.. � 24 • . �IeRM. WI. S5434 rl •, I t • •1 11 . • Yy a �.•• s • a l� .�. �. ? • a a• • !t �. del' 7S6•i000 .� ' 5 �� -= f3\ . = �.o _, }t :1/. •a'� :, 9 �. �•,� ; ,, '�'.• ; .V lafa• a � � tiIllti ,{ �, \�• � 1 . � � +� ..{ /�\ `����, a.l��1 /� t)' � \� ,I x ••• ••• ri:� •• � 1 I •I ,1 / 11 >. ` a _ �• `• • ' j 11 _ , .i/ 1. I� f t ••Ot• • .I •�; ( �� l � ,1 J ..• j � ' ' - •' • 1\ ��� - /I ` \, _ • •.••••••• A lb f1 -��•, �• I ; r: 1,,11 .••R. y • - �_ II • p' . a • � ' ': , ti • r , ,,�,•_• .t.`„� 1 long • •• '/ , �� •J..I:1��yT''� •.wI- — �O/11 �, Rs....Ir •.. V • n �, ` � •',`• ' •• •/ 1 1'• :wa io ' { • r ! 1 • / Al • _ ` 1 � 1 •, , ` ..•. 'I !, • .• • a � ,.. .• • t •. 1 ` ,1 1 i 1 1 _ ..� i •� "..w A at. I•.•. :• •• 1 a 1 , t' Ltl , wa •• ai�••••• y �Me +_ • • , ` 1 i ,�� '.� •. 3 �� opt J 1 � . .'. .• • �-, �� 1 �V.1: a• i 1 I -• 1 i „ • �, •w ' i . a._ ♦ �_.•.y_ -- t f •� •. e M Ik • ,1 ,• • t• 1 1 I a `• / 1 • .. ��• • -- •, • r N/e .• I.I • 1 • `a` • �, ,a, '1 • • •. /J �•1• t• ` 1 0 } 1 �' ••• • • • f r• � � .: � •' �; •.• \ b,, .' f . .too ,i • l ' i - i � � � " t - - • _ _ I ►. +� J `♦ •� .• : �: i �i ..v: . • . %i. ti. a `► �► y., r •.�• :: .} : h I •. t. /I j Sawa � ..1.�.'. - • �� � � r , II _ . 1 • -..- r y �,: ,�,,. 111 hM• .. •••t• t•r1q IN•.11 •Ilt ••ay NM•• ` • :�aC b Iw•a1••• •dear, tialalwl •11• .•y /Wt '•♦ NII IN 104.IrN ./.r• 1••N .•••1.1:•: • \ • '•` • N•H•, T t �I •• ./j • I /11•♦S► a•rN• wIt t•••.N w ar •.N M .►.• • ` ' • • • / ••w . +. �.�`i_ M• • N .NMI•. •.•M.I.IM r.N. 1 • `• 1• 111 . ••H ••.• •NI•• Is, at ... I •••. •• Il• •1•t• � • • / • -- -~r•o.w••r•• •WN. N paged. I.O.W. •.I.O.W. /gN11, ..• "` r MN, ••t •♦N• wWN •IIt • N••IaN N1 •••r.- • �. �.• NI• N Pastimes y M11•.s Nt•/ t•roy• •+..... N1 4�i1i/ N••*".i.IN ogle ils1 0 M/N ` r ••• MWIMUM SETBACKS TYP• EASEMENTS GROUPS OF P5 rj LARGE TREES �... • /•,, :; � , r ' am seeP , w 1 TWW^ cs/ar. anal an* Igo"" fts ~ own" S. red.eaes a red etsa ' ti.rt0 eaks 1S nr•ceualroM - -i11 - __._... —. —�_ t0'cottaWool all . t white oN Nkottyaoo/ IS11 • NA tvtaNe. t!•cottsnwod o•aa 1S /w111aW. !S•tetNeaeM.... • �_..__... - - 10 1 tree• ear teoo so. it.' _ io !io�tt'�eii•..?d1..w1'!t1t,.tlE! .. !'«tt_ rya ow N to diameter were located. I✓ PC : / AIIw/wp eat IA IA Ill... ai /1/wt 1. :/•!'•AAr it PAt /e�.ew.w.e /i.t w.t / /4th• A0.6 •e..• / A4010 /•dew Me.. II ri•tb.� Ni..s',� J. Cesii•►i iwle►ral/ d. AW S dr•t• %t ewitl•y tA►wel:ew A ® dr -o41r eo I I o stI tttr#/ieq ♦ e/tt A'grg: A scat •/ 8'W 1. u /�a / •wl� •j* /s/ned / r•/r e/'/•t #*..w✓. :•+ /wd/.: a /.tr /�. I. /t:•• /a 1//: /: / iw 4. It /.�H•WW6 /. A/iwt tii +M�tywrM.I M /arl:tt /i /aI A'/r�ll, 1 few rwa. 9. Two/ ri/ •.ar . J/ t/ Irrs• Alt A, P-0- t/ I:ytr /«.:y .i/• It Oew /a • It/ kb per are* /t.. �arr:w /,twlwa .I /✓. / /. /b RMI. IU/Itlat Woods/ eras 7A, N ry /wMOS�� /rat 0 tltrl) 1 •nnit «•w Oat OI• ••Ir•t. a•\ '•M•M � M •.r•• •► ••M/ IIa•• 1 ••• • •w btM••N too a.•.wW r/ti sae -r /•wW11• /S.•!t/ JAS/ 11 E. �. 'q i/0 Jt somf a I'VC, «NO SuQ✓F✓OQr Ito ler, ! ton IV?. MI. /rtle Oi/Ni, Mi//nttoJo . 0010 /epHo/te 7!t •Itlsi .. LOCATION MAP �^ -�TOt Preliminary Utility Plan of 1../ M F4 "1 L Esc - MAPLE :.,. pow -vie. mperSar Jews WOODS ESTATES SECOND ADDITION .-- «••,�• .IuMr1111r .t111rAt j( City of MAPLEWOOD; Ramsey County -I- MINUI IgIN1/A1AlN •r Ml � .•.•I�w �� trwrt�Alr.•�r 7 � s.• J lM 1. slgeM t. trtAKE w0006 EitAlEi. Cwrlry, M1 e01� tq • ! MM "peg r. r • I r1 •,� t' •• 1 7 • I r' r 1 1 1 1 �• I r• I• F W /'r iii l: i• �•./ I M• • • �. �. • iY� I �t �i +� t • ! i On .• • I 1 ; 1, f 1! III I• j• �• 1 t / t / ,� / ',, S'+ 11 + iMi • l '' ♦ ♦ i 1� •l + I • J' :�I ti j2 j► ifli [rh,It� ,1 Kr. '�•�f �MI�A •' 1 • ; 7� ..�`\ 1 \I •1�~'1 �. I i`. •• •• 1 1 ' \� r .wi • .� . �.r / 1 4, 11 J•N ./� W •� i • r. / i i ♦ •• �i �� •� �• 1 . , 1 /..� . 1 • , f' i i / w..1 • r `1 i 1 1 • d �i !Jl JI --- ' I "'. : ♦:' ♦�. E:0 •1 .` • ., 1 • \ 1 i 1 • . l ♦ `r` '� � «' •j • ,.• � ITT -, • ♦ ` • • 1 ♦ I �` 1•� •.r ^• •� ` )`p '• r� ••� • • / • • i , I tsr ' i 1 1 .! I • i 1 : ,r i .• • �, • r r\ i •,• 1 � •' . ` ♦ .-I• • ' ,1 • �..t� +•V �...����/ 1±2 • �� � ..,V•,..,�� _ � .J 1 ' _ / 1 • • �!. • ,`t � �� r � � , `\ « r �� � � «\ �.`J,` � �•��•` , ..r- •••rte• • «. t•. • / .t �•• ►- •� _ '• �i ♦•• • r.w •• 1 . 1 1,2 •i . : 1 .� \•= �I�.• ' •,, •\..` •• r A14 (r .� 1 1� •' I'sl.M y • � I •� 1/ `• 3• R• 1 ' ,• +Gt A. 3l 0 6-11 �i. •• .r OI•J! N i I 4. S:�YN'M'Ir t • • , a 1 i 1. _ -( 111,'liNo•Z lww F.� I ' ^ \ .` .r_ '• Y +• 111 .. 1 •� . _• ♦•��� fi�. •. •. ' ••• �• �. � � , •• �'t / 111 •J » .• • ,,'i 1 1l:.rN�.l i 1 4 ••� c `�� • v • l', �G ` C ♦•. ; ` •� • , � P/\.• l � _ • / 1 • 1 . •� �. . s •. . a 1. q.T r • r •.. . T I i l� 1 • .,. f 1 i � � • � � t.•••.• ..� -I, 1 �` • • • MM•I � r � 7 � •, wf Nf. 1•� �. I 1 1 •' i N11 1;;)lil ` � /..� 1� f •�6 ♦�. \' .• .. \" � . . •!� ♦ . / • • • • ♦ � �� �. i �1 •N••�1 ,� \• � ' Ii� /••• � 'I.SL� ` r .v.. w. Y i• ' \ ir.. • �1 , �, •• •`. \' 3 • •t .• �• • 8�• • 1 , • • 1 e , , I • ' 1 /1 '• ! ' • I' tN 211 . •'. .• , \ /' .• 1• T••. . V ; •`; OA 4 �• ' \. 31 Fog rl i 1 1 Il S :/1 Si •.: J .. i • _T :�" i • �' • f� ♦ .ii 1 �!, 1,/, •; • ; •I �r 11j 11'•` � .. ` ` •`•1 I4 • •• ^� yr►; i r.• �J +yb1 I �`. 1• .,.i � '•, f .r ; e \ •.� w •,� •.` � , 1• ;•�; •1/' 1 •�r =•�® t.9 U • � • � • ; • I \� rl _ 2}. , _ F. , r �L • • ' N �. III 1 1 14• _ , 1 "; '/ .� 1 . � �1 L, t I• M 1 ,1 ♦ • 13•, ♦ .� 12 • +• •, r . • { • • y 'V ' ��rf •I r . �`, �`•,, 1 1•� 1 / ` , ,, /�0 .• • \ ." N J ,, . �,j' l ./ .n w 1 ♦ `• 2 / \ \VVV/ /�• `.'' w 4 .♦ I 1 1 V : 1�j J • 1 i . -Y , 7 1 /�. • I� J •• /1�,�• ,• j`•/ ' ,'•�, 1 •��`. •• •%. , ••• IMt �,� �,��+ i ��• ;,,��. '� • , ,.�• f t �• 1 \ : 1 ,• 3. {M'• • \• . ® Y r • .. 3t `�•�,•�• ,� 1 t 1 `a - ��� y 7 ': • •.M/I .ih i`i I.N Ii•••Nf I. 4 k i ✓ �Y• ,. .•�y � ' •• ' '; _ •, ( ��. .• • ,r .� • • X � ` ��, `•.. 1 � 1 ; .�r r S S• T�: •r ••.. I 1 r✓ •M•.••t••t `• • �� I /""'2TT�T •, :.' •♦ ,�\1 . �• 1 1 �' •, ` 3 •• � Alf'. 11 deg see yI • • r • • • 1 . • - •� r . • 1 � • MIA 1./ !+� • \ '� aw•1 • �. � +`. • ! 1 ♦ _ / _♦ 1 1 , r' 1 •Ir i \1 •• • ' j • / ,Ir wt 1/fYwlrJ A /Yllt i• - •1 , •� ' I �.� �.. � .. � 1 . «T7'tLT:L::� •,.•• /. 1 i 1 1 r ♦ ♦' � :�` -... • y lj - /��ll�...— I • .`.••••• �.� ' *• h� i • •• � l i • / S I•,/i!N • . .• • i 1 •.• �•.r .� •' i 1 1.- .) t 1 • �� •�• .• • S • 1 i 1 •; H 14 P w•t��,Jt • ' ► }' ; it : ; •.• • • ; ..•.'' ; 1„ r Mt••' .. It 1 1 �'A'/Y'It + .I _ `._ • N 1•. Iw1. •► • ,.� or t •1/ *4 /• /I / ••, .W I ♦ I i, •`• r % • •. i . •• 1 11 ,• • \ �AA r 9 //Ir. & „ 1 •T 1 .•, ' w • ,.. r.• •�� • 1 I ••.• ... ..��,• •,• , i i `• + / • `• \ \•• •1; • •• 1 j. � /IYI iw/ r �I NY ' • 1 I , ' 1 f1� ,/ + , � •` � •• ;_ •` li; • • r l ; 1. P MN.j /fIw•/ t/ y tAw1..s 1 � '. .w. �`.• . (r �. `• / I j• ®J►n. /es #rehoN Vil w '�•• 1 : • fi •t c ' I� } R. •t/•Ins1 Ae” C: J' •/ .��. i r.. . -. •.. r...r.i +• •y w . f I / � ��• •• i / «V � �'I �� i• •.•�i �1 4 i• i /1 , t• \ � .•1 I I/NI /I. �..�.•�.�.�. • •�.., �� /� • ;. . I. /1:.r/e tI /i /: /p iw�. o//riwt/ /'ham .I• Ir'N• �� I cwt /ii II/,/Ar1r••J �I/fI /i, / /sI . 7j/ Yw.1 /1 1 • ,1I' �• epw tee. / ✓✓" �. MO/ Jb/ s.0. • �!1 /.16••4 It 0.0t AN Aph pop or's It • ` ••\ f � �, Il. C «..w/ r.i.•� :e NirN:lA1 I.rI. \ I w C .t. r + NIII'Ward SETBACKS TVP. EASEMENn ..-. -. . __�..__. . _... . i •• .a•r.r /...� �,... •p ► Land ANocatlon 1. w �, •-• to 0 M • ,11 • lo t O , $M O* POMP INS —._ .._..._` t9*0 AsM + + , � !•lNAry •N/Y,1.1y •1111.11. rw✓/lQe.� ow M• AIM► .. N I , / A'v Awr�wrr/ y t,R,l, ,r l./ �• /. �� a.w Awes 110 J T A j t f 1 f R f t 1 A,f 10wINN $*001S — � ,.00 ft" i01M $1.01 AaN North sauos t inch a 100 Foot owner a oovolopor 'th Suburban Development Co. o/o Mr. Jack Monkvoldt P.O. 0600 31004 8100N. MK $5434 its 786 000 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN MIS AIM or, sac rLANO w e t weepav CHARLES W PLOWE CONSULTING ENGINEER Oros Otrl, Anne M011r„ OAOOR�IM rat, Ow 1!111 1Ss•11Ss Arid JAI Al (M•!•••1 'qua t SONS, INC, ulvo SUQVEV � /go lorin /pq J&j. A/f in /t Oint1, Mi,�ntt� /o !10 /I /fAbo t ve •Alli 0 T 0 0 M v r r Q) 0 z 0 M C+ c+ u LOCATION MAP Preliminary Piet of M , / MAPLE WOODS EST N orth • ESTATES SECOND AD DITION Y .. HILLSIDE PARK City of MAPLEWOOD; Ramsey county •� , -x1 • Y� • LM /, wM 1. "OAR M!000S [STAT[i, Aa11w�. . WwMN. M )10 t, I f•1�1 l: �• f .•.•!� rr l • ~ S IYR 1.I /H r M I♦ EXISTING TRAIL —�� t �I ,.,� ., �, sl�t'�;;.;,� 4848 r�•••I �., 3•k• I •J , 1�� , j , r • r: • �� 1: ` + � •M �� •,I-• � �• •� •I 48 48•' • �� I ��; • • •��� .rr • � r• • '1 ,,% %"4 • 1 ♦ , •� ..A • ! 1 ♦ . , ,f lM .M M 1✓i .. • ...r �� r • r� 1•Ie . 1.. • •;` . �� • 1 1 . 1 .• •. w•• 1 •� • -JIJl. JI •. v IJ •.�- � . r _ _J • i• 1 ' • • 1 ♦ ��,I / 1 ♦ • i 48 48 r -rte ^ -�� r% r • ` •.•••'• I. I�", II.III����� ♦ • 1 • �, , �` • -�'�_ _ sr . . 1 . • . ...... _ , '�._._ • . . \ .r — -' _ ` .. •�, :•� �1 -1 100 ft� ab . ,.� �, - Mob s • l Y y ,� -_•s ._._ ... , ; .• - ', ,.. t -V :, • 1 RIPL.EY AVE N LIE ., _ ., A ll q. • M N•rl �,, _ t� _r • . - 48,"483 . �'•'�. ZZ w+�:+i+.t a . �, J .: 10� ♦ qw , i �•� . R �, �• ,. �x� _, + 1 - r A Dove per \ 1, ,•' _ ` , : / , '• 1' „ �, \ '1. \ . 1 •• • 1 48.48 '�• �. OwA� l o per Il ;N, i •\ • I A; • r • / �-' k��31 `.<i7 ��� ; ` �2 �r - K�.' , ' North Suburban �. ., r •_z� '� �� �'' .;s .,� t t?evelo ment Co �(/N6Sf0 ;a 1 4 Of L .4848 .. , ' ,+ . . ,\ .�.... !. "�►� 1y ♦ •,�. i 0 6/0 / Jack Mtnkveidt Iw�,,, ��� �. /,1, 48"11 ® M ,eett •'� i.. Y3 �s ��' :i:• •'�. 1 1 ! .. / • `Ir� �, 1 • �. 1� y� 6 ' 0. M 3480" ONW. VA 55434 I. 1 1 � .i • �� i it � , ' ' ®' � at • ®. 1� _ A r ��i •�' i•' •. -.. � � • 1'. Vii. �•; � 7 � '.t 1 oi ' .4848► - ., �i 141 J ' '� �.7� .i / -;�/ �:•• jr rr '• ' +•' ,• 48 48 ••1 1 1 .11 + "�• 1 ••�� 1, t' / ' • ' . •' • �.. `' V ' , 4848�t� Zr ,`• • • w �• ,�`.. •� ' I 1 � ► • �/• •; • f '� . • 4,�} 48 /• r � 1 • •,� �• �y f i � � r •,, • � I - � • I • j �• 48' � • i ._i • •' • I • tl � ' � . - ., • � .. �• � -. - 48 '' 48 tome • ,, , �„ • . � / A • s ±r � � .��� Z, � 1 III • � .� .• • � 48 48'' � 1 � � • 2 - - � \ ' ; � ; `�,1 , ,.� , /.y 1' _ � •.,�, I � � �• .. " j � �. _ �\ rI •' i • !`� ! 17 • x - , ♦ i/ • T _ - � • / j l ` •�� ' 4848 , ♦ / • 48 48• , • ■ •.�G :'!� ' 'I• •.wI /!/ 4848 • II.I• 1` ` J,' r •J.y ( I' ` � v � t 4848 '� , �. . �•� 1. 48 48 ~ •1 • • •'I • • • ..y� *• , 1 1 ` ' 11S`• J. .48 t ♦ .�..- =• ; •-i.!. .• rIl►•1sJ1/ v-J' ` �:a Iw•�1/ a w \ }llq� / ».,7 .�` : ; �� :.• i • i y 1 `; 4848 ,• � ! t • • , r • • • j' :. T Zd- ACM: `�1 I �I�� •1! 1 j �•� •r•irrr ' � ' \h r , . " , �I� • . .• ,, J 4848• \.• ♦ 48 48 , J. I 1 1 1 • I • • MN _' t •./ .� - _ T �`!�!`. •�.•"' • 1 1 1 • r'L • N _ � - Zi.1 =• Z � f� Y t � • •, ��•w� 481' M M If,•iM�I �IWq '� r 1 _.� �. • rwi �t , - �., •`. •.i iI 4848 I } � i�',i �� _ � , �• �• •� 1 �. •.. � wK •� •�.� -tt-} • ��.� • Z - � 1 1 ,! • ': - 4848 .. • .•'3 S *y . N � • . 1 ,.` t.li / . � • •I�►1 �I IJV /� r�.w /• �./k • •+. 1 1� ' 4848• • • r - _., r ` • 1„ ,i • N /48� , I .� ♦J- Z • •. '. • •,1 MM 4848 • , •. • , err J • „ 1 t • / • 1 .. Ib • /� /48w Mii. I/ •T • �.=.� . 1 •♦ • • /• 1 f \ 1,,. 11 48 1 �/Rr1 1A►••.�.I �~ . , r•• • • - •••.......•r. • J ♦ • j r . �• ` ..4848 �• • .. �, J. �Iw /1•'I Jw/ •' , �� '"1 :' •, ` .,, N • 4848 `• • �. /i.J �M /N lI. • 0 . • ' �, • • 4848•~ ••♦� ��, 4848•. JII • r � s N�NuI •4wMw �'~ •/ \�. / 48 48. ,• . 4848 i. Y r,• ,'; �• 48 48 •1• •• •1 �, `. I I-4 —A •�I48J•Itd f�... �./ •/'JM•�.,w✓ 0 M tow 146. 0 . K D4494, • ter AA per draw M rn . 4or �. _..... MMMQMIM sETAACK! 1 VIA. EASEMl1iT0 '' v _ . •...... ` Q • -- ' M ____ m _ „ t LAM AMoe�tlee M 0 SNOW Mwow~ww w/•wwrwww 4 f r 1 '� 1,. • J•p •1••r•� U.....w. w. t.• M F&" M�N�� •-�� �..��tr N MIN oft AW`ti f1MlMrrhl gNN ••-� ,���r* .,�t 011..1 a+�A'�"�.., E[. QUD t SONS INC, low I»� M•N LAAJO Sy4v6✓0Qt •i•7At O/IIr �Zwn/0 A!►II/ 3 mow. m f s s E 4F 40 Q .. n�ri a( ?M700�p rf"ui Wa @ ywft•• �S L tsn The m is br pbmr PAVOM Or#1 W" 00M nod be used wwwo pre w 11"Fogamoveni is mrz*qmi WOOT9 KA• LANE ► REV I S - '1pl�11{f. . + 6-18-87 UP-We P9 aft-0 0- AWL. �ft* Ip W� f Pft dp dP 0031 0 T 4600-W"40 AN 0 a G 0 of, 240ON9 6 L O�ft AVG A LMLI CAN&" • like, ---- v MCI- �� '" J .�r� , _ o -2160N. Sea Am -41 a some" 1 A MA) 04" OW PPM sa. -AV 0 0 W �� 1 � .�' � ,fir, • i 4#V a SOL. St ►UL It PAM son L Am J- -CCV 6- -.Wet 0 3M Icycle rou es i s Existin Bicycle Route. (on street) Existin Bicycle Route (off street) 0 won" Potential Bicycle Routes on street) v #few db 46 Potential Bicycle Routes (off street) C+ C+ a '� Count Proposed Bicycle Routes .. C+ 2 Proposed Regional Trail 0 City Proposed Off-wRoad Bicycle Routes 3M o 40 Source,, Minnesota De partment of Natural Resources; Maplewood Transpo�rtation Plan, B arton,*Aschman and City of Maplewood 314 son L Am J- -CCV 6- -.Wet 0 3M Phil and ',::-1'hirlP_ Klitzk e 12 Sterling, Street N, lViTinnesota 5115109 December 26, 1991 Tr ' t-, n n t h I-lobert-, A-- _ t-_.).-iate P"L Y -r of ple wood L) e? a r IVI r - Ro W to tile pj--pc-f to p Our stron---r p p o --%,j Zi 'D Addy ion In slic-,ir, t -loze- - q_ = �ls� Z , ^;( d F uejic7�vc: tj .4 A r T r C-� q. an to w4c-tland.-., -arid de tit ruclion of wildlire t I A h b -fvrlth 1'ncreassed t."Iaffic jooor road conclitionS and the I�A o f ' Lin olid lots in t hie -are-a mahe thic, �'Ii, n, 1 n ibirl- 1 n oor t,,-hc)i(, for the future of McIplewood n k--,,%: p r o p o,-,% W t n t t, '} fd plat bCcacuse of the following � -, 1 - r n, , o n t.: i::� A. lVie,at'Ure Trees,; the area consists of a mature wooded area with a , 017 spec-le 111cludin Some hard wood trees, All of the trezes `Art i�f the ever threatened urban fore-t. The current Cit Couni.,-_il has attempted to protect trees from development. Don't a llow this woods to be lost, I Wetland's. the area Includes wetlands, Fift fertili..ed lawns) %vill drain diretctly into the interconnected wetlands in the neighborhood . Wildlife we have observed and enjo fox, deer, g eesse, ducks phe_,�_;,ant and a g reat variet of birds livin in the area to be Arid developed. IC -1 f f ic WO I a f t h;, • uld not onl g reatl',ir alfr'ect tile livrIls r d, but so r I - j n d. n d 1_ 1 1 121 h b o s iving on t (Do Sterlin is the onl nor-th/Snouth those of us wl-io iv are Street - onnell. - Ition bett en McKnight -_--ind Century z-:Ind rnar of the 11,Cw residi';--mts wotild use it, in -addition to thos,.-;*,> planned for 25 Attachment 12 f -� L 1 ,+ lti.� - tv 1 n t n d -v '-�f 53 1 t'l --a t r -Yin an i n o r d i nate n u rn b r of cars often travelin too fast, to and from the ne,,arb Hill-Murra Hi School A. 4. curr(_--,nt traffic ievels it i Ter 'j yr difficult and o"ten d-ngerous �tterript to turn left f© Holloway ionto D-AcKni and from J6 onto Centur The planned devvrelopment -v r._)-.11d increase the traffic at these intersections. r.., , - ��o - I_- (- %J tj or ad )nditions The wetl and"s, and :subsolls undz---,r- I,,- -'� - . - "or- the 117_it,�i* to up e, ill the h it, too C-'%XVnensiv(_> C, be re'_-Tuired to brin the -s:.treet t o one c, i p t v n -n+-- 'tho;se- rnade +o other deve'.oprnt.;_ in t.he cit\e I 4 k 4.1 0 �-S �i 1 1 v � � 4 : �t T�: 1 a � .• ti � ? r � "C- speed�- at n irnpr -'rv,"er' roiid do t'1-,:)- the nna if -'"Y' r h i (--'I ri"ve throu short-cut" Will the 1�3,trc:,let bn-- I'"' At the developc2r's expense? ai.ntainec' T r1 L,-t -t thre time th,-_-it the preli tz lminar plat for this 10). p nra e n 1- cc-).'r-ne-s before the -it there '_:�ire rna-mr, m.- n,,,,r u nc� c) I A r 13 1 (1 i no'\ev h�_)rne on 'Os with ur people to bu the '. 4 - M JVJ o('-d -nd n of the unsold In';ts care wer d and near e flana"' the gell-t-r-al rieighborhod, Wh ut thc�_"'� f r �7_-";:5 g r d U-- C" rl'ci �_j P s T11. r o habitats-) and wildlife inorder to h:_-An more a_rld "blUild y oi_.ir ne.-Aft home. hiere," si T + �1T%L and voljr stLAff take our concerns into ` jC t fl. ._ wl-ffle loo in at this) plat, 'You were hired n1v the ► "V Y I vc cl 4;%. p ca L �'U "Unoider what I'Sk beS411, for th.2 I - - for br--,st, not what iz:) 1 Dea-se do what 1 4V t, 26 .-- I ; .z.)incerely, Mr. Kenneth Roberts Office of Community Development City of Maplewood Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Charles Quistad 1823 Mary Joe Lane Na St. Paul, MN 55109 Mr. Roberts, December 23, 1991 I am saddened and grieve to see our community is about to lose another area of natural open space. At the same time, I have a sense of relief to see the area of Maplewood's Estates Second Addition is proposed to be developed as single family homes. I would briefly ike to outline m Y Y objections to the proposed development by North Suburban Development, Inc. My main objection is what a development like this will do to the wetlands. The proposed homes surrounding the pond ing area (Outlot A) will add more pollutants; fertilizers, etc; to the pond. I recognize that we, in the Gudims Kresstn Park neighborhood, may already be affectin g the ponds. With the pond on Outlot A connected to the larger wetland east of Sterling, it would only be a matter of time before it would accelerate the desolation of the natural ecosystem. Somehow the pond should be protected or buffered from the development. My second objection is the disturbance and loss of habitat. There are many forms of wildlife in this area of the community that are seen and enjoyed. The include deer, red fox pheasants, Y fox, owls, and snapping turtles; to name a few. Best Possible Use In my opinion the best possible use for this tract of land is to leave it virtually undeveloped. ped. This area, if developed, would make an outstanding community park. It has the terrain and features for nature trails and walking paths. The sloping terrain would encourage fitness while the wooded areas around the ponds would provide enjoyment of wetlands. Alternative If Maplewood's Estates must be developed by North Subarban , a wider buffer has to be made between the ponds and the development. I have included an attachment of the preliminary plat azY P plan with an area marked which 'I feel would make an acceptable buffer. The area would keep lawns closer to the top of the current grade running down to the pond. The lots effected are: • elimination of lots 2 -22, 3 -3 and 3 -4. • redistribution of land affecting lots 2 -8 through 2 -20. Thank you for your careful consideration of these or any other alternatives which can be found to protect the natural wetland area. Sincerely, i Charles Quistad 27 ; Attachment 13 27 December 1991 Kenne'L Roberts O. of Community Development Maplewood, Minnesota Dear Mr. Roberts; As resident and owner of a.Maplewoods Townhouse directly south of the proposed Maplewood Estates development I would like to express my concerns. We had hoped that the Hillside Park area might eventually been extended south to preserve the habitat of the animals, birds and plants in this area. Many of use bought here because of the proximity of countless animals birds and plants. We do, however realize that taxable housing in this area is a viable alternative. However, we would like to be assured that there would be no additional trafficr through our property, which we maintain. We would like to require that an easement with fencing and berm be placed at the south side of the proposed development. Our outdoor pool is located just beyond this area and even now we have a problem with trespass and vandalism, mainly from the Maplewoods Aprtments on our east. May we have your consideration? Sincerely Georgene S. Karpiej 1694 McKnight Lane Maplewood, Mn. 55109 777 -0942 Z Attachment 14 December 20, 1991 Mr. Kenneth Roberts Associate Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Attached Neighborhood Survey Dear Mr. Roberts: I would like to elaborate on my objection to the proposed Maplewood's Estates Second Addition illustrated in your December 13, 1991, mailing. My first and most important objection to this proposed project is the destruction of forest and wetland habitats. The property in question is home to thousands of warblers, finches, hawks ducks, geese, woodpeckers, egrets, and great blue herons to name a few. This property is also home to deer, red foxes, and numerous other mamm_ als., insects, wildflowers, medicinal plants,, wild herbs, grasses, trees, and fruit. There are two ponds on or near the property that not only provide a refuge and feeding ground for waterfowl but also support s o large populations of fro g PP g and turtles. In a country that is increasingly destructive to its wetlands and forests, Minnesota has been a leader in the preservation of its natural resources. It was my impression that the city of Maplewood was even more committed to the protection of the last remaining "wild" laces _. g P within its boundaries in the face of the encroachment of the Twin Cities and its urban troubles. I would be very disappointed if Maplewood reneged on this commitment b allowing the Y g destruction of this beautiful property for the short - sighted, short -term purpose of creating revenue for itself and corporations. It is more important, in my view, that Maplewood continue to be a leader in the conservation of its wildlife habitats. My second objection is that the destruction of this property would lessen the quality of life of the many residents who enjoy its serenity, wildlife, and beauty. I rented apartments in the city of Saint Paul for many years, lived on concrete., was packed closely together with other people, and endured stressful noise and air pollution from cars, buses, motorc Iles, and other human Y beings. I was burglarized, terrorized, and frightened. The presence of the natural area surrounding the Maple Woods Townhome Association is the reason I bought a townhome in Maplewood. The homeowners in the association, the residents of the apartment building nearby, Y, and the residents of North St. Paul enjoy these woods and ponds and I believe that the property in its present natural state contributes a great deal to the peace, serenity, and friendliness of these neighborhoods. Residents stroll through the many paths in the woods, watch the birds and other wildlife, and wait in excited expectation of seeing a deer or red fox. To destroy this natural asset by cramming in more houses, more people, more streets, and more noise would 29 Attachment 15- Mr. Kenneth Roberts December 20, 1991 Page 2 be a great disservice by the city of Maplewood to the many citizens of Maplewood who benefit emotionally, spiritually, and psychologically from this property. It is my opinion, and I believe it is the only responsible choice for the city of Maplewood, that this property should be kept in its natural state. I urge Maplewood to honor its commitment to preserve the last few wildlife habitats it has left. Anything else would be a natural,. financial, and ecological disaster in the long run.. Please think of the future, not the short -term profit. Thank you. Sincerely, Lucy A. P chke cc: Nature Conservancy, Minnesota Chapter National Audubon Society, St. Paul Chapter 30 IJAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, North Suburban Development, Inc. (Roger Kolstad) applied for a change to the,City's land use plan from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density) and OS (open space) . WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at Ripley Avenue at Lakewood Drive and Myrtle Street. The legal description is Lot 1, Block 1 of Maple Woods Estates (PIN 13 -29- 22-34- 0001) . WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows; 16 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 2, 1992. City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning 'Commission recommended to the City Council that the amendment be approved. 2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on , 1992. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 19 The change would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plana 2. The change would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. 39 The City has already planned the homes to the north of this site for RL use. Adopted on j 1 res \Kolstad.LUPres , 1992* Attachment 16 31 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, North Suburban Development, Inc. (Roger Kolstad) applied for the vacation of the following - described street: That part of the north 33 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota and that part of Ripley Avenue lying between the east line and its Southerly extension of Lot 11, Block 2 and the east line and its Southerly extension of Lot 11, Block 3 all as platted in Hillside Homesites, Ramsey County, Minnesota and that part of the north 33 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota and that part of Ripley Avenue lying between the Southerly extension of the east and west lines of Lot 6, Block 3 all as platted in Wiesner Park, Ramsey County., Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. A majority of the property owners abutting this street signed a petition for this vacation; 240 The Planning Commission discussed this vacation on March 2, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 3. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Lots 5 and 6. Block 3, Wiesner Park Addition and Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Hillside Homes Addition, all in Section 13, Township 29, Range 22, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City does not need this right -of -way. 3. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. 32 Attachment IT This vacation is subject to the retention of an easement for trail or park purposes on Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Hillside Homes Addition. The developer shall file the vacation resolution with the final plat. Adopted on j 1 res \Kolstad.vacres , 1992. 33 , RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, North Suburban Development, Inc. (Roger Kolstad) applied for a change in the zoning map from F (farm residence) to R -1 (single- dwelling residential). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located at Ripley Avenue at Lakewood Drive and Myrtle Street. The legal description is: Lot 1, Block 1 of Maple Woods Estates (Pin 13- 29 -22 -34 -0001) . WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 10 On March 2, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on 1992. City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. 59 The R -1 zoning is consistent with the proposed change to the City's land use plan. Adopted on , 1992. ji Attachment 18 res \Kolstad.rezoning 34 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood would like to vacate Sterling Street from a point 120 feet south of the North St. Paul border to a point 238 feet south of the North St. Paul border. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: The City Council held a public hearing on March 23, 19920 City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the vacation is approved, public interest in the property will accrue to the following abutting properties: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MAPLE WOODS ESTATES (PIN 13- 29 -22 -34 -0001) AND PART OF S 1/2 OF SE 1/4 WLY OF FOL DESC LINE; COM AT SE COR OF SEC 13 TH W ON S LINE OF SD SEC 985 FT TH R 78 DEG 40 MIN 620 FT TH CURVE LEFT RAD 100 FT FOR 157.08 FT TO POINT OF TAN TH R AT RA TO TAN POINT 450 FT TH LEFT AT RA 200 FT TH R AT RA 225 FT MOL TO THE N LINE OF SD S 1/2 OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO HWYS - RDS & ESMTS) IN SEC 13 TN 29 RN 22 (PIN 13-29 - 22 -43 -0001) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City does not need this right -of -way. 3. The adjoining properties have adequate street access. Approval is subject to retaining a ten - foot -wide trail easement on either side of the centerline. Adopted on , 1992. 35 Attachment 19 E 101 YO � • oO, 24 ell% X 5 !1- - 0000 GOOD •- �0 \ . �� \ �� t ' i OHO 2 -- - — �tA � � � � 1♦ �� A so � � r \�` '.► rt o �� %�� s D 1` • a gyp �� N 14 Z G 0 0 : �9 � 0 5 f - �_ ° off _ �q '? •0 C 20 %0010 d; 1 �. 13 �, - -' ELIM1h —..✓ /J- lop N 1 Water= 1001.6 ♦x �. % -- � 0 c'o Z O p 4 y 0 - - o � O2 ■ ■ Fo 'E THIS LOT "fvu C T \ � A ♦ � 1 �t � 1 11 i ° o 1 0 i� N STREET - - VACATION TRAIL J S s' PETITION TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. I �a The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property .known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the prope rty in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ramsey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. 'gna re r ,^ Address 00' Y �Tt-f -4v r 4 e 1 y n 4. 50, f 6. 7.� 10. 11. 2. .4 X 14. -I- . . ./ PIZU19 0)) A a r PETITION TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNIN COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ramsey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and pzairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. L ignature Address 3. � 4� 10 r 0 4 f LA . 11. 40PTY 1 VA 120 150 so.-.00 .11, � C PETITION TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ramsey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. Signature Address 1. ✓ 2. 4 5. 7.� t .j A i vC 1P z Ps PETITION TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota., strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple goods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ramsey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose More forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. Signaturt, Address 2. 3. 4. �5 P . 6. G� 7• 8 9. f �. 10. i 1 12. 13. i / 1 i v 1 --1" 14. 15. Alf /7GG Zu r '."� /�� /t // �/ PETITION TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ramsey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. Signature Address 1. --tV S" c T" - 2. 3 L - 4 t -7 a I 5. < < 1 1 4� a 6.- 7 J � 8. OF 94 04-04 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. PETITION TO: C HE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is. part of one of only two forests left in all of RanLSey County. The count of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity, 13. 14. 15. Signature Address PETITION 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its P resent natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ramsey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. Signature Address 9. • es you to a public hearing The Maplewood Planning Commission invlt p � y 0 2 1992. at 7 .m. In the Cit unc it .zambe a30 Road 8. North Suburban Development is r)roDosinq to develop the Maple Woods Estates Second - 7. /7/ U'00 s. PETITION TO: THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION. The undersigned citizens of Maplewood, Minnesota, strongly oppose the rezoning of the property known as Maple Woods Estates Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Maple Woods Estates, Ramsey County, Minnesota, unless is it rezoned as open space, park, or another designation that would keep the property in its present natural and undisturbed state. This property is part of one of only two forests left in all of Ram ey County. The county of Ramsey and the city of Maplewood cannot afford to lose more forest, wetland, and prairie. We urge you to rezone this property so that it remains natural and undisturbed in perpetuity. Signature Address %0-0-100' /':J JI Rd R.) r t . U 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Be 14. 15. MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: EAW - Maplewood Estates 2nd Addition DATE: March 11, 1992 The Planning Commission is recommending that the Council require an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for the Maplewood Estates 2nd Addition preliminary plat. The state does not require an EAW for a project of this size. The City Council can require one if they want to Staff does not feel that an EAW is needed. The developer is preserving the wetlands and most of the trees as well as giving the City four acres of park and a five - acre outlot around the pond. I have attached a copy of the EAW form so the Council can see what information it would provide. The EAW would take several months to review, plus preparation time. The developer feels that this may kill the project. The State allows us to extend the 120 -day limit on reviewing plats to do an EAW. attachment: EAW form Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAM NOTE To PREPARERS This worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) or its agents. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data necessary for the worksheet, but is not to complete the final worksheet itself. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. For assistance with this worksheet contact the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) at (612) 296 -5253 or (toll -free) 14WO -652 -9747 (ask operator for the EQB environmental review per) or consult SAW Guidelines," a booklet available, from the EQB. NoTE To REVIEWERS Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. (Contact the RGU or the EQB to learn when the comment period ends.) Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation, and the need for an EIS. If the EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an EIS (see item 4), comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. 1. Project Titre _ 2• Proposer Contact person Address Phone 3. RGU Contact person and title Address Phone 4. Reason for EAW Preparation ❑ EIS scoping D mandatory EAW ❑citizen petition ❑RGU discretion ❑Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category number(s) 5. Project location 1/4 1/4 Section County City /Twp Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: 1. a county map showing the general location of the project; b. copy(ies) of USES 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map (photocopy is OK) indicating the project boundaries; C. a site plan showing all significant project and natural features. 6. Description Give a complete description of the proposed project and ancillary facilities (attach additional sheets as necessary). Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or produce wastes. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. Provide a 50 or fewer word abstract for use in EQB Monitor notice: Township Range 9. Land Use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. 10. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after develo P went (before and after totals should be equal): Types 2 to 8 wetlands Wooded /Forest Brush /Grassland Cropland Before After Urban /Suburban Lawn Landscaping Impervious Surface Other (describe) Before After 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources 8. Describe Fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to ` ' e or avoid adverse impacts. b. Are there any state -listed endangered, threatened, or special- concern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? CJ Yes Q No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 2 1. Project Magnitude Date Total Project Area (acres) or Length (miles) Number of Residential Units Unattached Attached Commercial / Industrial / Institutional Building Area (gross floor space) Total square feet; Indicate area of specific uses: Office Manufacturing Retail Other Indus trial Warehouse _ Institutional Light Industrial Agricultural Other Commercial (specify) Building Height(s) S. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state, and federal 'ts a rovals and funding • PP g• Unit of Government Type of Application Staff 9. Land Use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. 10. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after develo P went (before and after totals should be equal): Types 2 to 8 wetlands Wooded /Forest Brush /Grassland Cropland Before After Urban /Suburban Lawn Landscaping Impervious Surface Other (describe) Before After 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources 8. Describe Fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to ` ' e or avoid adverse impacts. b. Are there any state -listed endangered, threatened, or special- concern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? CJ Yes Q No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources was conducted. Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 2 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging, filling, stream diversio outfall structure, im undment) of an surface water (lake, po nd,, wetland, ` S� p° y po stream, drainage ditch)? ❑Yes ❑ No If yes, identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the alteration, including the construction process; volumes of dredged or fill material; area. affected; length of stream diversion; water surface area affected; timin and extent of fluctuations 8 in water surface elevations; spoils disposal sites; and proposed nutigation measures to 0 imize impacts. 13. Water Use 8. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? ❑ Yes ❑ No For abandoned wells give the location and Unique well number. For new wells, or other previously unpermitted wells, give the location and purpose of the well and the Unique well number (if known). b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (including dewatering)? ❑ Yes 13 No If yes, indicate the source, quantity, duration, purpose of the appropriation, and DNR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation. Discuss the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels. C. Will the project require connection to a public water supply? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the supply, and the quantity to be used. 14. Water-related Land Use Management Districts Does any part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, identify the distr and discuss the compatibil of the project with the land use restrictions of the district. 15 Water Surface Use Will the project.change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other users or fish and wildlife resources. 16. Soils Approximate depth (in feet) to: Ground water: minimum average Bedrock: mum average --d� . Describe the soils on the Si te, giving SCS classifications, if known. (SCS interpretations and soil boring logs need not be attached.) 17. Erosion and Sedi mentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: acres cubic yards Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe the erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. 3 18. Water Quality - Surface Water Runoff a Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe methods to be used to manage and /or treat runoff. b. Identify the route(s) and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site. Estimate the impact of the runoff on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the runoff may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines' about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needtd.) 19. Water Quality - Wastewaters. a. Describe sources, quantities, and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. b. Describe any waste treatment methods to be used and give estimates of composition after treatment, or if the project involves on -site sewage. systems, discuss the suitability of the site conditions for such systems. Identify receiving waters (including ground water) and estimate the impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may a f fed a lake consult "EA W Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) C. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, identify the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements which will be necessary. 20. Ground Water —. Potential for Contarrdnadon a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: mum; average. b. Describe any of the following site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes; shallow limestone formations /karst conditions; soils with high infiltration rates; abandoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or mislimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. C. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating ground water. 21. solid Wastes; Hazardous Wastes; storage Tanks 8. Describe the types, amounts, and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated, including animal manures, sludges and ashes. Identify the method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste indicate if there will be a source separation plan; list type(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. b. Indicate the number, location, size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). 4 22. Traffic Parking spaces added Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) Estimated total Average Daily Traffic (AD'l) generated Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and its timing: , . For each affected road indicate the ADT and the directional distribution of traffic with and without the project. Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on the affected roads and describe any traffic improvements which will be necessary. 23. Vehicle - related air emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. (If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.) 24. Stationary source air emissions Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions (such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the sources, quantities, and composition of the emissions; the proposed air pollution control devices; the quantities and composition of the emissions after treatment; and the effects on air quality. 25. Will the project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction and /or operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the sources, characteristics, duration, and quantities or intensity, and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors. 26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site: a. archeological, historical, or architectural resources? ❑ Yes ❑ No be prime or unique farmlands? ❑ Yes ❑ No C. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? ❑ Yes ❑ No d. scenic views and vistas? ❑ Yes ❑ No e. other unique resources? ❑ Yes ❑ No If any items are answered Yes, describe the resource and identify any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 27. Will the project create adverse visual impacts? (Examples include. glare from intense lights; Iights visible in wilderness areas; and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks.) ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, explain. 2$. Compatibility with plans Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive land use plan or an other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of an local, regional, state, or federal agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, identify the applicable plan(s), discuss the compatibility of the project with the provisions of the plan(s), and explain how any conflicts between the project and the plan(s) will be resolved. If no, explain. 5 299 Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure, or public services be required to serve the project? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure /services needed. (Any infrastructure that is a 'connected action" with reaped to the project must be assessed in this EA W; see "EAW Guidelines" for details.) 30. Related Developments; Cumulative k- npacts 8. Are future stages of this development planned or likely? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, briefly describe future stages, their timing, and plans for environmental review. b. Is this project. a subsequent stage of an earlier project? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, briefly describe the past development, its timing, and any past environmental review. C. Is other development anticipated on adjacent lands or outlots? D Yes ❑ No If yes, briefly describe the development and its relationship to the present project. d. If a,b, or c were marked Yes, discuss any cumulative environmental impacts resulting from this project and the other development. 31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. 32. SUMMARY OF ISSUES (This section need not be completed if the EA W is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document which must accompany the EAW.) List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. CERTIFICATIONS BY THE RGU (all 3 certifications must be signed for EQB acceptance of the EAW for publication of notice in the EQB Monr'tor) A. I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature B. I I hereby certify that the project described in this EAW is the complete project and there are no other projects, project stages, or project components, other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as "connected actions" or "Phased actions," as defined, respectively, at Minn. Rules, pts. 4410.0200, subp. 9b and subp. 60. Signature C. I hereby certify that copies of the completed EAW are being sent to all points on the official EQB EAW distribution list. Signature Title of signer Date 6 H mmota Environmental QualkY Board. Revised June 199Q y� 1 6 l Y E S we the undersigned are in favor of the resolution to close (vacate) Sterling Street from. the Forth St. Paul border to a point 238 feet �s6 as recommended by the City Engineer. We are in favor of a cul -de -sac on Sterling making it a dyad -end street from the north and the creation of a 10 - wide trail extending Larpenteur. We agree with City Staff that this change to Sterling would be in the public interest and that adjoining properties have adequate access. C9 si 5� S�Y)O�j i t Sslai 51 09 L M, .00 ,� ` Maplewood Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 3 -2 -92 540 PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Maplewood Estates 2nd Addition: Land Use Plan Change, Street Vacations, Preliminary Plat, Zoning Map Change, Street Project Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. The president of North Suburban Development, Inc. said he is in agreement with the conditions of the staff recommendation. In response to a question from Commissioner Rossbach regarding the debris on the site, the representative said the site would be regraded and the debris removed. The developer said there would be less of an increase in traffic in the area with single dwellings than if this property were to be developed with a higher density zoning. The public hearing was opened for comments from the audience. Twenty -one members of the audience spoke.in opposition to. this proposal. Some of their concerns were the potential for vandalism and trespassing on adjacent town house property, potential drainage problems, ponding areas, woodlands and wetlands, additional traffic and public safety concerns. A member of the Sierra Club spoke against development of this property and requested that an environmental assessment worksheet be. done on this property to establish the size of the wetlands. Commissioner Rossbach stated that as a rule of thumb the houses would be of a greater value than that of the surrounding homes because the development costs would make the lots more.expensive. The representative for North Suburban Development, Inc., agreed with that statement. Since there were no further comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. Ken Haider, Director of Public Works, responded to questions from the Commissioners on possible drainage problems. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution changing the land use plan for this site. This change is from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density) and OS (open space). This change is based on the following reasons: Maplewood Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 3 -2 -92 (1) This change would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) This change would be compatible with the surrounding land uses. (3) The City has already planned the homes to the north of this site for RL use. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Axdahl The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Maple Woods Estates Second Addition preliminary plat, subject to completing the P g following conditions before final plat approval: (1) The City Engineer approving final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans. The grading plan shall show the depth and location of the Great Lakes pipeline. The drainage and utility plans shall include a five- foot -high, vinyl -clad chain link fence at the high water mark around the pond in autlot A. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. (2) The apartment owner to the south of this plat must give the City a 20-foot-wide utility easement, which includes ownership of the private sanitary sewer. This easement shall be over the sanitary sewer line from the south line of the plat to the Larpenteur Avenue right- of-way. • g The apartment owner must also give the City a right -of- entry agreement to allow City maintenance vehicles to use his private drives. The developer shall build 10 -foot -wide gravel drives over the sanitary sewer on the apartment property. The location and design of these drives shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The purpose is to provide maintenance vehicle access to the manholes. The developer shall document to,the City Engineer the condition of the private sanitary sewer line. The developer shall document this condition with surveys and television inspections before the existing line is transferred from private to City maintenance. If the City Engineer determines that the private sanitary sewer line is not acceptable for public use, the City Engineer shall approve a repair and reconstruction plan Maplewood Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 3 -2 -92 for the line. The City Engineer also may approve another design for serving the site with sanitary' anita sewer if the developer cannot repair or reconstruct the existing line. (3) The Director of Community Development approving a tree plan which includes the developer marking ll trees g which are to be kept on the property during and after development. The developer will be held to the City of Maplewood's tree ordinance for replacement of trees that are taken down as per the ordinance. The Director must approve this plan before any grading. begins or the City g y approves the final plat. (4) The final plat shall have drainage and utility easements along all property lines. These easements shall be 10 feet wide along the front and rear property p Y lines and 5 feet wide along the side property lines. (5) The City Engineer approving a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, for all required public improvements, erosion control and tree planting. This agreement shall include, but not be limited to: (a) The placement of temporary fencing, during construction, around woodlots and trees that the developer will save. (b) The installation of street lights in four locations, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. (c) The installation of the following eight -foot -wide bituminous trails, subject to the approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation: 1) Over the proposed park, between Sterling Street and the intersection of Ripley Avenue and Myrtle Street, 2) Between Lot 7, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 4. 3) Between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1 (d) The complete reconstruction of Ripley Avenue between Lakewood Drive and Myrtle Street. The reconstruction shall include concrete curb and gutter that shall extend to the north end of the curb returns on the north side of Ripley Avenue. These curb returns are for the intersections of Ripley Avenue with Lakewood Drive and Myrtle Street. Maplewood Planning Commission -5- Minutes of 3 -2 -92 (6) The developer shall provide public sanitary sewer service and public water to Lot 13, Block 3. This may require a privately -owned grinder pump and 2-inch- diameter force main. (7) The developer shall revise the plat to show a 20.foot- wide drainage and utility easement centered alon g the property line between Lots 3 and 4 Block 3, if he decides to bring sanitary sewer this way to Lot 13, Block 3. (8) The City must order plans and specifications for the improvement of Sterling Street. (9) Deed Outlot A to the City. (10) Revise the plat to show a 20- foot -wide extension of the park between Lots 21 and 22, Block 1. Rearrange the lot widths as needed to meet code requirements. (11) Change the utility easement between Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, to a 30 -foot -wide drainage and utility easement centered on the property line. (.12) Drop the drainage easements for the ponds on Lots 6 through 9 and 16, 17 and 18, Block 1, from the final plat. (13) Submit recordable deed restrictions to the City with the recording fees. These deed restrictions are to prevent the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the' Great Lakes pipeline. (This effects Lots 1 -6 and Lots 22 -27, Block 1, and Lots 1 -7, Block 2). The developer also shall tell the purchasers about the pipeline. (14) Approval of the Watershed Board to fill part of the two wetlands on the east end of the plat for a trail. (15) The developer shall remove from the site all existing debris on the site from previous construction including any existing foundations, pipes, or loose debris. (16) Grading shall be limited on the development site to only the areas that need to be graded for the location of home pads, streets, utilities or drainage requirements as put forward by the City Engineer. (17) Cooperation should be arranged between the City of North St. Paul and Independent School District 622 pertaining to any common drainage problems which need to be resolved due to this development. Maplewood Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 3 -2 -92 (18) Require an environmental assessment worksheet pertaining to the development area. (19) Require soil borings to be done to determine the suitability for construction on the site. Commissioner Pearson seconded The motion passed. Ayes -- Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, Pearson, . Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays-- Axdahl, Gerke Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which vacates the following parts of the Ripley Avenue right -of -way: (1) East of a point that is 150 feet east of Lakewood Drive. (2) That part between the west line of Currie Street and the east line of Myrtle Street, subject to retaining n g easement for trail or park access. This vacation is based on the following reasons: (1) It is in the public interest. (2) The City does not need this right -of -way. (3) The adjoining properties have adequate street access. The developer shall file the vacation resolution with the final plat, Commissioner Anitzberger seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Axdahl, Gerke The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the resolution which rezones this property from F (farm residential ) to R -1 (single dwellings). This rezoning is based on the findings required by ordinance and that the R -1 zoning is consistent with the proposed change to the City's land use plan. Maplewood Planning Commission -76- Mlnutes of 3 -2 -92 Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Axdahl The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the resolution which orders a feasibility study for the improvement of Sterling Street . g between Larpenteur Avenue and the north line of the plat. The developer shall provide an $8,000 cash escrow to the City to cover the costs of the feasibility study. If the City orders the improvement project, then the project will pay the feasibility costs and the City will return the escrow to the developer. If the City does not order the project, then the City will only return the unused art of p the escrow. The feasibility study should include a study of the traffic and solutions to the speeding P roblems that are currently occurring on the street. Commissioner Fischer seconded The motion passed. Ayes -- Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, . Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Axdahl, Gerke Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend that if the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. Commissioner Pearson seconded The motion passed. Ayes -. Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Sinn Nays -- Axdahl Commissioner Fischer moved to amend the agenda, moving item 5 b - Comprehensive Plan after New Business. Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmund ik Sinn The motion passed. March 9, 1992 To: Ma William Sandber Council Members. Mike Kuehn Harr L Bett McCollum Karen Sandber 13 Re: Maplewood Estates Second Addition Subdivision This proposal, is on the a f or the Maplewood Cit Council meetin f or March 23, 1992. The residents.alon Mar Joe Lane and Riple Ave. in North St. Paul have concerns.re draina protection of propert from floodin water in basements, and pool dama resultin from the proposed development. In addition those Maplewood residents on Sterlin Ave.. ...and Knoll Ct. receive North St. Paul services and the proposed addition of 3 homes on Sterlin -Ave. f urther impacts -, the services, and . responsibilit of North S*r... Pau.'.... ra.. wuatCar, sewer, electricitt.-, --nd var-fous aspects of . a I A. ion L I street maintenance. We have the followin issues and concerns 14hich we would like addressed: 1. The North St. Paul Cit Council should be involved in the approval of the proposed buildin sites on Sterlin Ave. re the impact on cit services, 2. The North St. Paul Cit Council should be involved in the approval of plans for draina and water runoff from Maplewood Estates so it does not adversel impact surroundin propert owners in North St. Paul livin alon Riple Ave. and Mar Joe -Lane. The Cit of North ..St. ...Paul 1 has a responsibilit to protect residents from excess water draina that could cause floodin and a rise in the water table which could cause propert dama to basements and swimming,,,q I pulls as well as excess draina to the Maplewood residents. An` arran should be- made- with School District 622,, -North St. Paul, and Maplewood to extend the current draina basin be the south propert ji.ne. at 1817 Mar Joe Lane. Currentl a North St. Paul and District 622 storm water drain is exposed and drains alon side the pro at 1.817 Mar Joe Lane. Floodin and water backup currentl exist durin sprin runof f - a followin heav rains. If this development proceeds proper dra4 na from this area= must be co-ordinated. The proposed development, School District 622 propert and North St. �'- P�8til _prO C-O'tae the- .Lfc at ti le S -ch4- of the exposed draina area. Please visit the Careas addr .. sed. These issues -must,be addressed with some assurance and safe the residents before the development can proceed. Please g ive this y our immediate attention and response as to how this.will be handled. CC* Cit Mana North St. Paul, R. Gatti Cit En North St. Paul, D. Kotelnick Business Mana District 622, R. Julander Cit Mana Maplewood, M. McGuire Cit En Maplewood, K. Haider C.'Wi School Bd. Member, Soil and Water Conservation Bd. Member El 2 Please accept this petition on behalf of all the area residents. Contact people in this area are: Tom Alfieri 1822 Sterling Ave. ph. 779 -7561 Bette Jayne Haak 1817 Mary Joe Lane ash. 777 -3766 Signed L Address j j Y T S� J / L Please accept this petition on behalf of all the area residents. Contact people in this area are: Tom Alfieri 1822 Sterlin Ave. ph. 779 -7561 Bette Jayne Haak�,: 1817 Mary Joe Lane, ph. 777 -3766 Si ned Address j s X , Tr�� Y-1 LWA- � � w r i I I 5D -IL) K41 r Janet L. Grant 1709 McKnight Lane St. Pain Minnesota 55109 March 9. 1991 Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk City of Maplewood 1830 County Road B Maplewood,. MN 55109 Dear Ms. Aurelius: N i fi t} r�{t. ` �� ` _� • V.�� ti M 2 1992 I am requesting to be put on the agenda of the City Council meeting March 23 to speak on the issue of the Maplewood Estates Second Addition. Please let me know if this is not possible. Thanks so much for your consideration. Sincerely, toele Janet L. Grant 1822 Sterling 5 t ree t Maplewood, MN 55109 -5022 March 10,1992 Lucille Aurelius City Clerk, City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road Q Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Ms. Aurelius: I am writing to request to be included o n the City Council Agenda for the council meeting of March 23, 1992. I wish to address the council as spokesperson for the ' residents on the northeast Corner of the Maplewood Estates Second Addition Subdivision being considered for approval. Thank you for your consideration regarding this. issue . Sincerely, X A z Wa 6 Thomas M. Alf eri March 9, 1992 Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk Maplewood City Hall 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Dear Lucille Aurelius, M A f C In accordance with the provisions provided by the City Council to address issues on the agenda, I am requesting to be put on the agenda for the March 23 meeting to address the Maplewood Estates addition.. Thank you for your attention in this matter. V--06-� Bette Jayne Haak 1$17 Mary Jo Lane North St. Paul, Mn. 55109 777 -3766 rn MAR 1 1992 a w Mar. 9, 1992 Attn: Lucille Aurelius, City Clerk City of Maplewood 1830 Cty. Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 I request to be added to the Mar. 23, 1992, council meeting agenda with reference to the development of the Maplewood Estates. Sincerely, Sandra Van Erp 1748 N. McKnight Maplewood, MN 55109 E7! D A 1 1 4992 �. � .� ••a ..w � Ass ai!► ff. i .• � .�. +w � March 9, 1992 Lucy Aurelius Maplewood City Clerk. 1830 East County Road 8 Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Lucy, I am hereby requesting to be put on the Agenda for the March 23, 1992 meeting of the Maplewood City Council. I would like to address the proposed Maplewood Estates 2nd Addition. Sincerely, Lj�� a� Wally Wessels 2448 Ripley Ave E. N. St. Paul, MN 55109 770 -0926 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: INTRODUCTION Action by Council: En Modifie ]Rei ec te Dat City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Front Setback Appeal 1460 Myrtle Court Bruce Thompson March 13, 1992 J - � Bruce Thompson is requesting that the City approve a front yard setback of 4 4.21 feet. He would like to build a house at 1460 Myrtle Street. Code requires that a house have a front setback of. 30 to 35 feet. Staff may approve a different setback if it would not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties and if any of the following conditions apply: 1. The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes. 20 The proposed setback would save significant natural features, as defined in Section 9 -188. 3. The proposed setback is necessary to meet City, State or Federal regulations, such as the pipeline setback.or noise regulations. 4. The proposed setback is necessary for energy- saving, health or safety reasons. 5. The house is in a new development planned with larger setbacks. Councilmember Zappa appealed staff's approval. He would accept the proposed setback if the two abutting neighbors give their written approval. BACKGROUND On March 10, the Design Board approved the proposed front setback. Refer to the minutes on page 7. DISCUSSION The sketch on page 5 shows that the Mr. Thompson's front setback would be similiar to that of the two neighbors' homes. The sketch on page 6, however, shows that a 35 -foot setback would put the house closer to the street than the two adjacent homes. Mr. Thompson's house would then partially block the view from both neighbors' front windows. The proposed setback would better meet the intent of the ordinance than a 35 -foot setback. RECOMMENDATION Approve a 44.2 1 -foot front setback at 1460 Myrtle Court, because: .1. The increased setback would. not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties. 24 The proposed setback would not affect the privacy of adjacent homes, because: a. The house on the east has no windows on its west side. b. The house on the west has only one Window facing Mr. Thompson's lot. This window is for a laundry room. C* The two adjacent houses have a 45 -foot front setback* one foot more than the proposed house. mb\te\thompsn2.mem (Section 24 -29) Attachments: 19 Location Map 29 Property Line Map 3. Certificate of Survey (44.21 -foot front setback) 4 Certificate of Survey (35-foot front setback) 5. March 10, 1992 Design Review Board Motion 2 • 'j NORTH SAINT PAUL RI R _ �_�� i 19 Go o 0 00 29 2 4 0 HOLLOWAY AV �' . ...... W Q N Hillside J x GoodrlCh Z PA W { y 21 0 �a'� Pk 7 : # MOLL PLEY 5p\ AV R I PL AV CLE . •!, KINGSTON AV ` Z PRICE AV x W �. _ m ; MC KNIGHT LN `W C LARPE NTEUR AV tAJ T29N, R22W. W p IDAHO AV 14113 to TpNA AV J 1) CURRIE ST � , RASKA AV MYRTLE CT 5 p / 5. Z 3 cr N PA a WIN ORl... �' r1 • B;A L A NA Cr z 9 OAK H/L L IC i .: 6 Y U p v i ANGELA T JimsPro /Ng 3 61 Q MICKEY / / jZA� IVY - - -- AW ELKHEART LA �- � 6$ IFQYQTE 1 -.j N W �. I%_213 31 AR .1AN0 10 AV HAWTHORNE AV E ROSE y �N ST a E '. 31 t 68 �. N Z aaNwM vs G GERAIV o � MAG NOL AV 4V �O 0 Geranium c / Lake W W '� �1.\'' W Y Q g N 5 YJ, a E PL o cr CASE AV AR VESTER °a AV LOCATION MAP 4 N 3 Attachment 1 j f 82 .9f. 2 4i i p o as ~ ' "- I7o .o IOa ' i oo !! Zto /l v• �j a+ o f o o � o (I c � �s �6.N L'° 2 a h n s _ oft 3 f ( ' o ' �) ,00 '9 Ito. o; \00p ,2 �o) h 5� �% i . � � ' S. t o 5 ESnT o G �z,o t:,. P� AV o MONTANA v s r 7Jr s Sr 100 7 8� N CO N DO M i J U NO. Z 1 CO ^ • 1 40 - 09 9 , C+�) N M L Ame,vo r. { �� N A O N r � v » o .• ego . G R V R Et N H OUSES , cowoo . Mo ZIP- t t 4 3 f o 21,14, 3 a O U T LO T 4 t 7 7 I-i R w 74 2 73 �B � .bo ac 260 C37) D.L. N 1&4.,L4 J 134..9 (.39.70 0 C3 0 9 ' ? 0(3 7) ���,, •59 ac. ^ V E 5 1?.S, F Tix NA L 1--) ►NhG URA E E . 24 t , 4 , C N 0 7 OUTLOT G I V ft 7 L2 CIO w ' 13 M0 u) 2 / a (?8) - t 1 Y1 33 ``. (,� 13 4 . (639 84 Sb _. . N 9�0 �s o �`.0 77 03 �s.f rte. 8 s� a 8o gv 8s• 2r /o o_ 7P.40 ■ ■ ■ .'° 9 BR SK 5 ° 1 ti 2 3 4 N 5 6 ,. 7 ° 8 0 9 6 _ _ .� 1 o M '" 1 �19� N `� �git� �� � 8 7 Is �t�3) si) �_�) , (!�) ,� �� {8 3 Cs4� ash C8�} c •° 7 9 8.0 , `p , too. 9T 8 0 80 S o 8 0 8 o.o se. +3 l0 0 7 �o0 7 a a NEBRA AVE • :. �av K7 75 7S 84. 0J 7s• 73 80 �I13� JSS 85.3S 1lt.14 �i0- 1 { 'IJ c �3 9S 9 C >>� OUTLOT �1479� o p 1480 ,. 3 N �, ADD. ,., N D m 1 2 3 6 ro V 10(o.34. 75.0 s 7S '�� A «► +►. ta�.�s ���. , 7s rs a5• - ..` �. 1475 �: 1476 . 57 a c. / ° X44 + ro 0 �,0 T� / A / i J'l o t o A �`� ���� / 1 1471 � 1472 3 4 3 w �C st�7700'.! ( ) 14 67 1468 WETLAND ( 1 31) 2 1` '' 11 � ' o tom .�1 '� �'• 4 • ai AD D. 4 �n ��s E ,�� N 34Z.�S v�E�¢�.���°°� s 1464 qw 0%,,, ftaft • ' � J�o � o��• � i 1.463 _ 1 4.0 ..3 4'7. 144 53/.42 12.3 1460 to 2640.25 i r 00 • rp c a� Pvb op oSe o+ 4L,. k - PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 1 4 Attachneat 2 4 N - G * 2422 Enterprise Drive PIONEER LAND SURVEYORS • CIVIL ENGINEERS Mendota Heights, MN 55120 * en i .. neerin LAND PLANNERS•LANQSC; R CN TECTS — Ri I 9.* g (612)681 -1 914 Certificate of Survey for JOS M. Miller CIn House Address: 1460 M yrtl e Count North,' M0D.lewood, 'M Model Name: Covington � .,. MYRTLE COURT NO TH R -__ o. o . a� �T\ p = 4519'58" 3 D L- G ARAGE rARAI 44.21 � 6 5 1463 �-- -- - - -- \ o 4 HOSE HOUSE , c . ^ It.00 LT 144.09 N 89 W • ^ 1 1 IMh.�j- h vVA1 0 aAJc.I V • qoo•c Denotes Existing Elevation PR HOUSE E •(!� Denotes Proposed Elevation LoVvest Floor Elevation: Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement - ---- Denotes Drainage Flow Direction Top of Block Elevation: —a— Denotes Monument Garage Slab Elevation: --e,— Denotes Offset Hub Bearings shown are assumed LOT 7 BLOCK 3 CAVES NEBRASKA A RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by Inc or under my direct supervision and that t am duly Registered Land Surveyor under the law: of the State of Minnesota. Gated this day of A.D. 19_. s Scale: 1 ; = 30 ROBERT B. SIKICH L.S. REG. NO. 14891 — A1 n7nan nn 5 AttdChmff1t 3 2422 Enterprise Drive * Mendota. Heights. MN 55120 * P I Q N E E R uwo su9vEroRS � � � (612) 681 -1914 a Fax 681 -9488 en ineer n � PLWNERS • L AN DSCAPE ARM7E 525 Highway 1t3 Northeast g g Blaine. MN y 55434 *. * 1 (612) 783 -1880 -Fax 783 -1883 Certificate of Survey for Joseph M. Miller CI n House Address: 14 Myrtle Court North. Maplewood, MN Model Name: CoVin�on M YRTLE COURT NORTH R = 60.0 p = 45'19' 58" .. L=47.47 L/S _ GARAGE GARAGE 35 \1463 10.00 s.o9 1464 21.50 HOUSE HOUSE, t a m o Is 2 1460 144.09 N 89 W • 900.0 Denotes Existing Elevation PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATION . oo.a Denotes Proposed Elevation Lowest Floor Elevation: --- Denotes Drainage do Utility Easement To of Block Elevation: Denotes Drainage Flow Direction p ---- --c�-- Denotes Monument Garage Slab Elevation: -.—a Denotes. Offset Hub Bearings shown are assumed LOT 7 BLOCK 3 ,NEBRASKA ADDI RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am duly Registered Land Surveyor under the taws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this_ day of A.O. 19_. S C a I e. 1 Inca OfCet ROOERT 9. SIKICN L.S. REG. NO. 14891 6 Attachment 4 Community Design Review Board -2- Minute's of 3 -10 -92 (1) Repeat this review after two ears if the City has not issued a buildin permit f this project. (2) Provide a sign for a andicap- parking space. (3) Screen any new roof - o equipment. (4) Submit cash escro or an 'rrevocable letter of credit to the City for ny requi_ d work not completed by occupancy. Th amount of a crow required shall. be 150% of the cost the unfinishe work. The City must approve an reement from the applicant, granting the City permi sion to complete an unfinished work. Boardmembe rickson seconded Ayeb -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson b. Setback Requirements - 1460 Myrtle Court Bruce Thompson explained plans for his proposed house on Myrtle Court, Mr. Thompson had received staff approval for a 44 -foot front setback, but this approval has been appealed by a City Councilmember. The Councilmember has asked Mr. Thompson to get written permission from the neighboring homeowners. Boardmember Robinson asked staff if there is any code requiring an applicant to obtain permission of neighbors. Staff responded that only a driveway or garage which would encroach on the required sideyard setback would require permission from neighbors. Boardmember Robinson said she feels this request from a City Councilmember demanding permission from these adjoining neighbors is setting a precedent and it is not in line with what code requires. Ms. Robinson said this type of request creates conflict and places one property owner against another. Ms. Robinson said this request for permission from adjacent property owners places authority where it should not be placed. Boardmember Erickson asked why the Board is involved with this request, since it is a residential single dwelling. Staff responded that this request received staff approval, but was then appealed by a Councilmember. The Board is now required to review this as part of the appeal process. Boardmember Erickson said this proposed 44 -foot front setback is not only practical, but is taking into consideration the neighbors on each side by not blocking their view. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the 44.21 -foot front setback as proposed for the house at 1460 Myrtle Court, 7 Attachment 5 Community Design Review Board Minutes of 3 -10 -92 Doardmember Robinson seconded -3- Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Robinson Abstentions -- Thompson X T-01--o-) Action by Council, MEMORANDUM Endorsed._..,. TO: City Manager Mod if i e d Rejecte FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Design Review Date LOCATION: 1770 Gervais Avenue APPLICANT: Schwan's sales Enterprises, Inc. DATE: March 16, 1992 INTRODUCTION 1. Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. is requesting that the City Council approve their plans for an addition to the north side of their building. The addition is one -story high and would have 600 square feet. The addition would be on the north side of their building. The addition's design would match the existing building. Schwan's would also pave an additional 130 feet south of the existing paving nd stripe e p 10 parking spaces on the new paving. This is an existing, fenced storage yard. 2. The City Council must review this addition. It is Council policy to review any change to a site plan they approved. BACKGROUND July 12, 1988: The Community Design Review Board approved the existing building plans. August 8, 1988: The City Council approved a conditional use permit to build within 350 feet of a residential district. Council required adherence to the site plan, dated June 24 1988 unless the Community Design Review Board approves a chan pp eO g August 14, 1989: Council renewed the CUP for five years. RECOMMENDATION Approve the plans for the building addition and site plan revisions to Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. at 1770 Gervais Avenue. The City stamped February 13, 1992 on these P lans. The applicant do the following: 10 Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 20 Provide a sign for the handicap - parking space. 3,9 screen any new roof -top equipment. 4 Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work not completed by occupancy, p Y The amount of escrow required shall be 150 of the cost of the unfinished work. The City must approve an agreement from -the applicant, granting the City permission to complete any unfinished work. to \schwans.mem (Section 10) Attachments 16 Location Map 2. Property Line / Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. .Plans date - stamped February 13, 1992 (separate attachment) 2 /ors �N/V '�-._; 0 0 • 3 J W N QL T v Q WHITE BEAR LA :......... CO RD W J m W i W000LYNN AV W A'R CTS 0 o 0'0 LYDIA v AV PP �1P i Y w N C c c 19 cn 8 W W N OAP t BLVD z ��..� w = z APL- E LA Y 3 Map/e- a: t wood Hts BEAM 3 9 Y MAPLE VIEW AV ca l W -- r C U. a -- W 1 J KOHLMANO w POND f �,. a (2) PRIVATE STREET AV ,. a.._ EDG EHILL RD 10 II Z North w W KOHLMAN AV ? {:'� (MYSSAB/ AV) w Z Harvest Hazelwood � ix } 1 NORTH S.A N W ) CONNOR AV W Z X Q F0 a '!CT F U � T29N,R22W z a Z W a 3 `2 w �,. a ° z ,. a.._ EDG EHILL RD 10 II w Z Harvest _ ) CONNOR AV Pk OEMONT AV F0 a U If BR00 AV Q ELEVF. ?'4 Qi SEXTANT � in Four ::: AV XTAN T AV Seas } ' J a GER IS GERVAIS GERVAIS AV 5 GRANDVIEW AV W CT Q m VIKING DR Y ..j C,gST LE AV: 36 HERREN A CT COPE AV K ,Head Lake a Al 1 V W AV W N A �-- F- A 64 ♦.. a N to Z H .. Cn B v LAURIE a °� R Y �; a = Lac ' RIE RD a Sher- a Cr C v RD SAND- HURST wo0d!'k? AV CD Z Z Z = ST c C Y C j RD „ car~i 25 8 � e � R � E Ave BU RKE o Robinhood AV 0 °D E l0 R i DG E AV O p* / 3 A AV N BELMONT AV N C/tyHa// W t AV SK ICEMAN AV RECREgT /O�V 1R A 1 Q ARR''� AV Q Q� N ROSEWOOD / Cn RY- AN All J S AV -J S co Z LOCATION MAP 4 N 3 Attachment 1 co (PUD) , Rl LBC/ 4 50 2 (7) 1 1725 1733 EGERVAIS AVE., "A""VGERVAIS CT. IS 2-77eV, SCH N OFFICE/WAREHOUSE 1 0 (4) j 0 PERS,ONAL TOUCH. AUTO BODY I I G 17 . r- �05- 8 7 175.1 co HIGHWAY 36 PROPERTY LINE ZONING MAP GER PROPOSED ADDITION ti 1 I 1 f + 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 f 1 f + 1 1 + 1 + 1 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 p , 004bs1ER LAD I 1 i • ` _ 1 a 1 1 i 1 1 1 w f 1 C1 >► f 1 7�l� r - -4 x ADD 10 •��� �--- , PARKING SPACES - i 1 1 1 � I j 1 � � 1 1 � I 1 1 ' ---------------------------- - - - - -- t65.�i• ------------------- - - - - t f -- SITE PLAN Attachment 3 4 N MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH 10, 1992 10 CALL TQ. ORDER Chairper on Moe called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL / Donald Moe Pres nt Marvin Ericks n Pr ent Michael Holder ent Marie Robinson on Bruce Thompson resent Scott Wasiluk Absent 30 APPROVAL OF MINUTE a. February 25, 19 2 Boardmember T omp on moved approval of the minutes of February 25, 1992, as submitted. Boardmembe Erickson seconded Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson- 49 APPROVAL OF A ENDA Boardmember hompson moved ap roval of the amended agenda, adding .item 6 b - etback Requirement 1460 Myrtle Court. Boardmemb4r Erickson seconded Ayes- -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson 5. UNFINISEED BUSINESS There/"was no unfinished business, 6. DESIGN REVIEW a. Building Addition - Schwan's, 1770 Gervais Avenue David Lundberg, area sales manager for Schwan's, said he is in agreement with the conditions of the staff recommendation. Mr. Lundberg explained the construction of the existing building and said the addition's exterior will be built to match the existing building. The Board discussed the landscaping plans and the addition's proposed roof design with Mr., Lundberg, Boardmember Robinson moved approval of plans date- stamped February 13, 1992, for the building addition and site plan revisions to Schwan's Sales Enterprises, Inc. at 1770 Gervais Avenue. The applicant shall do the following: Community Design Review Board Minutes of 3 -10 -92 -2- (1) Repeat this review after two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. (2) Provide a sign for the handicap- parking space. (3) Screen any new roof -top equipment. (4) Submit cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the City for any required work not completed by occupancy. The amount of escrow required shall be of the cost of the unfinished work. The City must approve an agreement from the applicant, granting the City permission to complete any unfinished work. Boardmember Erickson seconded Ayes -Moe, Erickson, Robinson, Thompson b. Setback Requirements - 1460 Myrtle Bruce Thompso explained plans fo his proposed house on Myrtle Court, Mr. Thompson had eceived staff approval for a 44 -foot front setback, but t s approval has been appealed by a City Counc member. The ouncilmember has asked Mr. Thompson to get w itten permi sion from the neighboring homeowners. Board ember Rob nson asked staff if there is any code requiring n appli ant to obtain permission of neighbors. Staff re ponde that only a driveway or garage which would encroach n t e required sideyard setback would require permission fr eighbors. Boardmember Robinson said she feels this re st from a City Councilmember demanding permission fr these adjoining neighbors is setting a precedent a i is not in line with what code requires. Ms. Robins n sa'd this type of request creates conflict and places ne pr erty owner against another. Ms. Robinson said this equest r permission from adjacent property owners pl es autho 'ty where it should not be placed. Boardmember Eric son asked why a Board is involved with this request, s' ce it is a resi ential single dwelling. Staff responded that this request received staff approval, but was then a pealed by a Council ember. The Board is now required to r iew this as part of a appeal process. Boardmember rickson said this propos 44 -foot front setback is of only practical, but is t king into considerat' n the neighbors on each side by not blocking their view. Boardmember Erickson moved approval of the 44.21 -foot front setback as proposed for the house at 1460 Myrtle Court. TO: FROM:. SUBJECT, LOCATION: PROJECT: DATE: INTRODUCTION Ration by, C 4 Eridorse �.........._..®..�,_ M � Modifie ME ORANDUM Re j ecte City Manager Date Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Prel iminary Plat - Revision of Conditions and Time Extension Between Highwood and Linwood Avenues Highwood Meadows March 16, 1992 Mr. James Kayser is requesting that the City: 1. Allow him to develop a part of this plat before the City ,builds Sterling Street and Schaller Drive. I have shaded the lots he wants to plat on page 5. He wants to develop these lots this year. Condition one of the preliminary plat approval requires that the City sign construction contracts for Sterling Street and Schaller Drive. 2. Allow him to keep the names of Wildflower Court and Wildflower Lane. The City. required that the developer change these street names to Matterhorn Lane. 39 Extend the Highwood Meadows preliminary plat approval for one year. (.See Mr. Kayser's letter on page 6.) BACKGROUND March 25, 1991 The City Council approved the Highwood Meadows preliminary plat, including an easement vacation and zoning change. The Council approved the preliminary plat subject to eleven conditions. (See the minutes on page 7.) DISCUSSION Phasing the Plat Mr. Kayser may apply for a final plat on the three lots on Highwood Avenue. The City would have to approve a variance to plat the lots on Timber Avenue. The City Code requires that cul -de -sacs not exceed 1,000 feet in length. There is already a 1,000 -foot dead -end from Valley View Avenue and Schaller Drive to Mr. Kayser's property. T- 3 The Director of Public Works plans to have signed construction contracts for the Sterling Street /Schaller Drive project this summer. The City Council ordered this project last September. Street Names When Mr.Kayser applied for the preliminary plat, he proposed that the , City name one street "Wildflower Court" and another "Wildflower Lane." The City Council changed these street names to Matterhorn Drive. The City required this change because there is a Matterhorn Drive in Saint Paul that lines up with the proposed streets. It is a City policy to name a new street with the name of an existing street that lines up with a new street. The existing streets may be in Maplewood or an adjacent city. This policy minimizes the number and ensures an orderly system of street names. This reduces confusion and response time for public safety employees. Using street names that are consistent with street names outside the City also makes it easier for visitors to find an address in Maplewood. RECOMMENDATION Extend the Highwood Meadows preliminary plat approval for one year, subject to the March 25, 1991 conditions. kr \memo84.mem (12 -28) Attachments 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3*1 Highwood Meadows preliminary plat 4. Letter from James Kayser 5. 3 -25 -91 City Council minutes 2 01 MARN ST a s 0 8.1113-12 :. 5.13 s m . s i2o O v � O O Z 0 Z '('Gi�rwr 51)1' LOCATION MAP 3 Attachment 1 irm - -- r --- ONO .s Nor . ....... . / s t i s '"T • ■ „ �� .. • - o. to - , /: i �� t„ cN� .. h� ► , ■ - j • Of tilt 01 ,f� IOF� Cr A `. 9L • 'l �►� ` /' ` b� tr H 1 OIL _ t<' V4 T DO ' ! s ' a, e' w k A we s, / t ■ Is • 4 7 f• pro 8 oil) .., ., r�:t 2N0 A D' O ki Trf,) • • •� , •' '” ���• 'ate OYTLOT w •• at{• {fit D. (L) • J j 1 T ER .' wrtLOT A p1 h+1: ; W IC T L A NJ • - : tas......� ........ ................ j tt.... •. :' *UTLOT s ...... ............ .............. • 4 :. ..•.• .:........................ • 4 v `� O j .•.•.•: :: . :: .•: : :: :•:::: .•::.:: :• OOD .•:::..•.•::: :.•.•:.•: • ::• • :•.::•: .......... .. ...... ....... _ • _ •r t.( :• . • •r+ t. .. . ; : .si�.a�, :; - :::.. ; ■ ■ r� U72IF7 We tlr N rrIa�MU ■ iri ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • .••................' • - - • • • •'• • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • . • . • • .• . • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • .. -r ( ' : : :: i i : : ::• • : : :. :• ' •: i . •...... i : :: ,•: •�. i : : : : :: •• :.•• i : ::• ••: jp'� ��7 * 1�.��Y• • • • ... • • . • • • • , . • • • , • i • • • • • • . • • • . • • • . • • ••. • : • • • : • - '•� IN .. .............. ............................... • ......... • .. . s s o Cfa) .............. ............... .. ........................... ..+ • , • .. • • .• • • • • • • • • • -• • • • • • . • • . • • • . • • .. • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . ............. ............... ............................... ,� � - ,� C /b• 0 ( V ,� i �i : , : i � : :: : :. :• :: {• :: : :.•.•:.: • :��• ' :: •:': : : :: •• : : : : :: : :•� � '� • �% ftI • . •. ► • • . • • . • • .: ... • • • • • • • • . . • • : • . : : • • • . . • • • • . : • • • • • • • • • . . . •.•• \ C Q rl) a •.I/ V 1l 1:•• ••� • • • • . • • .. • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • .. • .. • • • • • • • • • •.• • • • • . • •• • . • • • . • • . • • • , . • • • • .. • • ... • • • . • • .... • • . • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • �• •. • • • • • • ... • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • •• • . • • • • ... • • • • • • • • • • • , . • . . . w OD • • x ..... ... ....... ................•.•.. ;........;... .......... rl� • • s ................ ............................... ..... .• l' M• • • • �.. • .. • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • - /r 111• • • . • ... • • • • .. • .. • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • . • . • • . , . • • • • . • • • • • • • • • r ` t �� 1•f� A Z, • . . • • • • • :• • . . • . . • .. • • . • • • . . • • . • •.• . • • • , • . . • • • • • • . • • • • • . • kilt ; , •� ,• • ty S .+ ' j - 3 .. . ;.........•.• .............. f ne IS t 3 Asti'( £� ....•.........•. ......� ......, ns • Z • H O f • • . II ... ..... ... :...... . .... l / ` ) N� f �L : N • C f r �f'' ��� .. •:: ••::. :�.:•::.. • •.... • . � • : ,VE• : •::. ( •I `111 / \ / ` ; l 04 I w ,L i R ' •. 1 L • •.' :.•.'.'•'. i .. . '.: ..' :. ::.: • ) ! 01 12� f3 N • i�1 (� �t' • ! � K .• Ar ' ° ' i c e +• h1) a ' � ouTLOT . ► . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;...... * S • VALLEY V I E W AVE. Irl • • • • • . • • • . • • • . • • • • . • . • • • • • • Y i 1 • i • • • . • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • - • .• lit Z � ' �`•�' , t •b�Yy,A1.► �f -- • .'. ••.•.....•. • .:• :.•.....•.•......• � �/ • • / � , � • ; ` s ` ' r L' ' ` •' . ITS ?t ���, '..........•..•. �... yy 3-• -., 0) 2'i ••. ,.•....•.•..•.•. . es s , +a•= 13 ra/ Jt7 S �O� s� /► •1 • ♦ M . . • • . • • . . .. • • .� .t. ��� �sf� �� : s = 4 ' �` i V J>w`'•► •� �Al� a , r 1t .�tllvt . � :• . rr y l F' (s) 1 �j 1 � 3 n t I1 A W I � , lit •tt .� Ie, f Met its. I 1 s ns' '• }it *T.'.• o' �a Lie 161 u tali ••' •• • �. •.,. ..�' i. �t/.2) _ •- SO ^. «■ �w ■ • ■mss ■t ■� ■ •• . .. .. _ L&W _ • - 1{T' - +SlTL ►Aso •! ...�.�� 177 t R1 7 � s�1 R 1 o R1= RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DWELLING F =FARM RESIDENTIAL P / ZONING MAP PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Attachment 2 Q N 4 ' ���. � � '' ' + , .� i . � ` �� .` ` \ \ ''. � \ \ . � � �. ` \`� � 111JW �'ii�o►etflr di10�iC`� ♦��. —� ��ppp .` ♦.. � \ \ � ` �� Ole •' /!���, w ` \� ` `� ��� \ \\\ \ \� \'. \ \� ♦ "�= \ ftb dow logo 0 '• f i I / '/ ' /�_�� - , \ \, \ \ I t ! r j�/ -• i // / �' �� r 1 ! . I willows r \ . .� � _ l ��• � � + ! /,/ � �/ � • /j � � � \ t =term J \ • . ' � �.., _ � ' / . ice/ i/ � / - o ! This 01. OV lows. 40P 117— J2284 ... .... Wy 0 l e t wt J-1 01 of a pt ' v•�:;: f fi:;r: ti;:�.ia:•'r+:': 'vit•' : itr�:• i�: '1,lJ.'� �' :::;t:; .. .► it twa } / 1' a ss>IS oo � 1 .. �. / /// ! •r / / �Q (24 ............ :;�;�; 'fit / / t / i / \ i fir. �,+,� 1 / fi. • :i•::: " • • •• v::: •:irr.. Otis '' • •" 1 / .- Vii;: ':•. �•:: :: . .. /1:: ' :•• :W . : :•..•• � ' � .,- � "�— t t ?ice:;. :�: ••: #:� ' 3:: • • ;:�: �::• • ; • \ / 1 / ; / .:;`.; :::�:, 1 J s . :: ' :'' • : 'r,• / / / / �° 1 to �/ �+ 2 1 Js ow r Ato, 14 t 6 :t T 1 - -- - �Iop 20 15 Is. Lis ot. ft : I +mid.�rir \ 1 - - I I I 1 1 + K { }� —'� �r� — i r . �_. ��. - -�� -- �� /— — fi r-----— � -- � —i i — �.. • — . ter— �--- -'�►-.— � • V f 1:. I "f / • ! ' •�.:•+� `,� 1 i1�'1 T YI t� t r 1 \ / _ �.!, -` .�.+— • —'!'*• ..: 7 .i ; \f 1 ♦ , , ti .� 2 t �0 I t - ss.�x• , puzL� ! ,� / / ! f �•�•� 1�.�10� _iI,S,�C'!` \ 1t + ' D� ' ` R�' M,C►DCI• tSC�• �` �• i�p�• r -3 AU 19 dp ? '011 . 1 AL •-- -- R'fl0ftit ftlbwo j • -- •;. ~ a� -� - - - •' - - _ - �.../� ,� Cfor111aE d th A 1-in low � t 1 ♦ 3 L: 4p Of X��k 1�; ::�s`•' ' :;s :::� j�, :::: •.. 100.0 t ..� - - -- - - - - ' ` < ��,.� : is •. amen A. • Mrl�l � ,� .•• — - � / I Y � .-. � -.raj _ � ,� 1,•: :.;'�•{ ah.:• � = } • � . ?} qft I do ooep wX _ 1 � 4- 0 4V f `.A. G r ro t +resrto �, PRELIMINARY PLAT - HIGHWOOD MEADOWS 9 5 Attachment 3 PHASE 1 March 8, 1992 Kenneth Roberts Office of Community Development 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Please renew the preliminary plat approval of Highwood Meadows. Enclosed is my check for $57.00. 1. Allow me to develop the following lots before Sterling Street and Schaller Drive are constructed. Block 1, lots 1, 2 Block 2, lots 1,2,3,4 Block 3, lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 Block 7, lots 8,9,10 2. Allow me to keep the names of . Wi ldf lower Court and Wildflower I1ane ( not changed to Matterhorn Drive) . James H. Kayser 2516 Linwood Ave., E Maplewood, MN 55119 Attachment 4 6 I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Highwood Meadows Plat: Easement Vacation Preliminary Plat Zoning Map Change (4 Votes) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Counci lmember Rossbach moved to aanrove the- Drel imi nary of at subject to the following conditions I. The City signing construction contracts for Sterling Street from Hill wood Drive to Valley View Avenue and for Schaller Drive from Sterling Street to Lakewood Drive. 2..Complete a signed developer's agreement, with required surety, for all required public improvements, erosion control.and tree planting. This agreement shall include: a. The placement of temporary fencing and signs .during construction around woodlots that the developer will save. b. The installation of street lights i n six locations, primarily at street intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. c. The installation of no- parking signs along the west side of Sterling Street from Highwood Avenue to the north end of the plat. d. The construction of an eight -foot -wide walkway and fencing between Lots 32 and 33, Block 3, if the - Ci ty decides to buy Outlots E. F or G. 3. Make the following changes to the plat: a) Add a 30- foot -wide drainage and utility easement along the west property line of Lot 10, Block 7. b) Add four (4) 20- foot -wide drainage and utility easements in the following locations: (l)-between Lots 8 and 9. Block 2 (2) between Lots 14 and 15, Block 3 (3) between Lots 1 and 8, Block 6 (4) between Lots 1 - 4 and 8 - 10, Block 7 c) Dedicate a twenty - foot -wide walkway between Lots 32 and 33, Block 3, if the City decides to acquire Outl ots E, ForG. d) Drop the easement between Lots 1 and 2, Block 6. 4. Grant to the City two temporary 100 - foot - diameter cul -de -sac bulb easements for Valley View Avenue and Crestview Drive. 7 Att achment 3 -25 -91 ttac�a�nent 5 5. Submit final grading, utility, drainage, erosion control and street plans to the City Eng ineer for approval. The erosion control plan shall address the recommendati of the Soil Conservation District and the Ramsey - Washington Watershed District.. The grading plan shall include proposed building pad elevat and contour information for each home si te It shall also include contour information for the areas that street construction wi 11 disturb. The grading plan shall illustrate housing styles which minimize grading on sides that have trees -that the developer will save. The grading plan shall show the depth and location of the Williams Brothers pi pet i ne. The City Engineer may approve deviations ' from the approved grading plan, provided the changes follow the intent of the overall grading plan 6. Provide a tree planting plan for the plat. This plan shall show the location of trees that the developer will plant. All trees that the developer will plant shall be at least 2 and 1/2 inches in diameter. 7. Revise the plat to provide a 60 -foot -wide . street right -of -way from Schaller Drive to Outlot A of valleyview Estates. The plans for this change shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, 8. Submit recordable deed restrictions to the City along with the recording fees. These deed restrictions are to prohibit the construction of a dwelling or its attachments within 100 feet of the Williams Brothers pipeline. (Thi s affects Lot 1, Block .4 and Lots 1 -7, Block 5.) The developer shall also notify the purchasers of the pipeline location. 9. Change six of the proposed lot lines so they are perpendicular to the street centerline or radial to the center of the cul-de- sacs. 10. Change the names of Birdsong Lane and Crestview Lane to Crestview Drive. 11. Change the names of Wildflower Court and Wildflower Lane to Matterhorn Drive. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all c. Acting Mayor Zappa introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 91 -03 -38 VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, , James Kayser applied for the vacation of the following- described drainage ea sement: That easement located in the east one of the SE 1/4 of the NW 14 of Section 28, Township 28, Range 22, lying east of the west line of the east one -half of the SE 1/4 of the NW 14 of said section. i �' 3 -25 -91 T--% J_/ S S -, , � � AGENDA REPORT �"��3.on o lz dorse . Modified., TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager g �� 0, RE: AUTHORIZATION FOR PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY CENTER DATE: March 16, 1992 INTRODUCTION During the last two weeks of February, staff reviewed 23 proposals that were submitted by architectural firms to provide the preliminary design of the proposed community center. The Public Works Director, the Director of Parks & Recreation, the Assistant City Manager and the City Manager interviewed the top five firms. The interview team is recommending that the City Council approve this first phase of the building design I nd direct the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract with Ankeny Kell and Richter (AKR) for the preliminary architectural design of the proposed community center. The cost of the design is not to exceed $29,400. Additional costs include reimbursable expenses of not -to- exceed $4,000 (consultant's travel expenses and in- house materials /supplies) and $2,500 for a massing model. BACKGROUND At the December 23, 1991 meeting, the City Council formally approved the list of components that should be included in the building. That list will be used by the architectural firm for the building design and construction estimate. At the December 23 meeting, the Council approved two additional steps in the process. The second step was permission to proceed with the selection of an architectural firm to provide preliminary drawings and a construction cost estimate. In mid- January, the City mailed 40 copies of the request for proposal to architectural firms. Twent y-three proposals were received, and five firms were interviewed by staff. Based on the proposal, fees, past projects, references, and the project team, City staff is recommending the firm of Ankeny Kell and Richter (AKR). The third step that the Council approved last December was to have the Community Center Advisory Committee review the firm and its proposal. That meeting was conducted on Monday, March 16. At this time, all of the steps that the Council directed staff to undertake have been completed. Now, it is appropriate for the City Council to evaluate STEP FOUR - consideration of the contract with the architect for the preliminary design drawings. City staff and members of the AKR staff estimate that this preliminary design phase will be completed by the end of ,Tune. At the end of this phase of the project, the City will have a site plan, building plans, elevations, image sketches, construction estimate and a massing model. Staff recommends spending the additional $2,500 for a massing model. A three dimensional model of the proposed design is invaluable for presenting a layout /plan of a building and how it will be located on the site. The model will be used as the focal point of public information forums after the study has been completed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a contract with Ankeny Kell and Richter for a not -to- exceed fee of $29,000 to provide the preliminary design of the proposed community center, a not -to- exceed $4,000 for reimbursable expenses, and $2,500 for a massing model. tmc Ao ion by Council: Endorse MEMORANDUM Boo di f i e R6Jecte TO: City Manager r ; Dat FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update DATE: March 13, 1992 INTRODUCTION I have attached the draft of the Comprehensive Plan update for the City Council to review and approve. BACKGROUND The City has been working this plan for about 2 -1/2 years, The Council started holding hearings on changes to ,the land use plans in 1990. The Council also directed staff to change the land use designations to zoning classifications. In 1991, the Council changed the density tables to reduce maximum allowed densities. Since then, the Planning Commission, HRA, HRC and .Park and Recreation Commission have thoroughly edited the text. Each of these groups has approved their respective parts of the Plan. On March 2, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended that the Council approve the Plan. The Planning Commission decided against neighborhood meetings, because the Council already held a hearing for each change to the land use plan maps. DISCUSSION There have been no major policy changes since the Council approved the land use plans and density tables. We have shortened the text and made it easier to read than the current Plan. The current plan is about 190 pages long. The proposed plan is.only about 97 pages. We have also updated the Plan with new information, such as the 1990 Census. The land use maps have not changed since the Council approved them, except for the names of the land use designations. As requested by the Council, we have replaced the old land use classifications with zoning classifications. As an example, the old RL (residential low density) classification is now R -1 (single- family residential) . This change should avoid some of the confusion we have had over the use of two sets of classifications for the same property. The next step is for the Council to review and approve the Plan. We must then send it to the Metropolitan Council and adjacent cities to review. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should review and approve this Plan. go /memo 2 3 . mem (4.15) Attachments 16 1992 Comprehensive Plan Update 2. Planning Commission minutes 2 MAPLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DRAFT MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA MARCH, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ..................... . . as 1 -Purpose . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - Regional Context ......................... 1 - Community and Neighborhood Identi ty . . . . . 0000 2 - Figure 1 - City of Maplewood 0000.. 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . 3 II. HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY . . . . . . . . . . . 4 III. GOALS OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0000. 7 -Goals ........................ 7 IV. NATURAL, FEATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - Introduction. . ................ 9 - Figure 2 - Soil Limitations .................. 11 - Figure 3 - Tree Cover ...................... 12 - Figure 4 - Wetlands ....................... 13 - Figure 5 - Floodplain ....................... 14 V. ANALYSIS OF POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT .......................... 15 - Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - Population Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - Table 1 - Population, Household and Employment Trends . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 16 - Table 2 - Population Characteristics ..0000..... 17 - Population if Fully Developed 19 VI• LAND USE PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - Purpose 20 - Goals 20 - General Development Policies 21 - Residential Development Policies ............. 23 - Commercial and Industrial Development Policies 23 #2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) - Existing Land Use ...................... 24 - Table 3 - Land Use Trends, 1975 -1984 0 0 0 0 . . . . . 25 - Figure 6 - Existing Land Use, 1991 ........... 26 - Figure 7 - Undeveloped Land -- Planned Residential Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 - Figure 8 - Undeveloped Land -- Planned Commercial- Industrial Areas ... . . . . . . . . . . . . *a . . . . . . 28 - Land Use Plan 0000 9 .. 0 . 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . 30 - Neighborhood Planning Concept ............. 30 - Table 4 - Neighborhood Land Use Plan Legend .... 31 - Land Use Plan Definitions. . . .............. 32 - Residential Land Uses ................... 32 - Table 5 - Estimated Persons Per Dwelling Unit and Planned Maximum Density of Dwelling Units 0 0 0 0 . 33 - Commercial Land Uses .. 0 0 0 0 ............. 34 - Industrial Land Uses .................... 35 - Land Use Action Plan ..0000 ........ . . . . . 35 - Table 6 - Land Use Action Plan ............. 36 - Table 7 - Planned Land Use Acreage, 1991 0000.. 37 - Table 8 - Fully Developed Population by Neighborhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 - Figure 9 - Neighborhood Planning Area Boundaries 39 - Figures 10 -22 - Neighborhood Land Use Plan Maps . 40 -52 VII. HOUSING PLAN. 0 0 0 . 0 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 - Housing Stock 53 - Table 9 - Housing Characteristics 0 0 0 0 0000.. 54 - Table 10 - Subsidized Housing Units, 1990 . . . . . . 58 - Table 11 - Section 8 and Section 236 Units 0 0 58 - Housing Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 - Housing Goals and Policies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 - Housing Diversity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 - Neighborhood Quality . . . . . . . . . 0 .. 0 . 40 . . . . 64 - Figure 23 - Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration 66 - Table 12 - Housing Action Plan . 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 . 67 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) VIII. PARKS PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 - Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 69 - Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 go . . . . . . • 69 Obj ectives . 0 . . 0 0 9 . . . . 41 49 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 - Classifications and Definitions .............. 70 - Existing Facilities and Programs ............. 71 - Figure 24 - Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities 72 - Table 13 - City of Maplewood. Parks Inventory . . . . 73 - Park Facilities Standards . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 . 0 . . . . . 76 - Table 14 - Parks Facilities Standards . 0 0 0 . 0 . . . . 76 - Application of Standards in Maplewood . . . . . . . . 76 ( a - Table 15 - Application of Service - Area Park Standards .00.00..0.900.000.0......... 79 - Table 16. - Application of Population - Based Park Standards .. a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 - Figure 25 - Parks and Recreational Facilities Plan .. 80 - Parks Policy Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 - Parks Action Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 -Table 17 -Parks Action Plan ............... 83 IX. TRANSPORTATION PLAN ................ 85 - Purpose ............................ 85 - Transportation Issues ................... . 85 -Major Street System 0000 .. . . . 6* . . . . . . . . . 85 - Figure 26 _- _Major Street_ SystemandLRT_ Plan __.a _ _. - -- _ _87 - Figure 27 - Typical Street Sections . 0 0 . . 0 . . 0 . . 88 - Street System Policies ............ 0 . 0 0 0 . . 89 - Travel Demand Management Policies .......... 89 - Transit Policies ........................ 90 - Bicyclist and Pedestrian Policies . 0 0 . 0 0 . . . . . . . 92 - Figure 28 - Bikeways /Trails Plan . 0 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . 94 - Table 18 - Transportation Action Plan . 0 0 . . . 11 . . . 95 X. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND SANITARY SEWER PLANS 97 INTRODUCTION 4 . . • The purpose of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan is to help the public and private sector in planning for physical, social and economic development. The Comprehensive Plan will: • Guide future growth and development in an orderly manner. • Define the proper functional relationships between different types of land uses. • Help to coordinate public and private sector decisions. Encourage orderliness and economy in City government. • Establish a framework to guide and involve citizen participation in City government. • Provide for a sense of community and neighborhood identity. The Plan is a guideline rather than a law. The City may make minor deviations from the Plan, which do not violate its intent, without amending the Plan. REGIONAL CONTEXT The Comprehensive Plan cannot just consider what is happening within the City's borders. It must also consider the plans of the surrounding cities and the region. The regional plan is prepared by the Metropolitan Council. It is called the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework (MDIF) Maplewood has considered the MDIF policies in preparing its Comprehensive Plan. Any amendments to the City Plan must be sent to the Metropolitan Council for their review. This process assures that the City Plan will be consistent with regional policies. COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITY A. concern throughout this plan is the encouraging and strengthening of neighborhood and community identity. Lack of Identity Factors contributing to a lack of community and neighborhood identity include: • The long and narrow "L- shaped" physical layout of the City. This results in neighborhoods that are physically closer to adjacent cities than to most of Maplewood. • The number of limited access highways which divide the City. They limit community, social, political and economic interaction. • The natural barriers, such as the chain of lakes. They separate the western part of Maplewood from the rest of the City. • The division of Maplewood into three independent school districts, which also serve other cities. • The absence of a post office, combined with the fact there are four zip codes assigned to the City because of its shape. D Positive Sense of Identity The City has designed the policies in this Plan, among other things, to encourage City and neighborhood identity. The City can reinforce these efforts by: y Having neighborhood informational meetings and public hearings as changes to the land use plan are proposed. These are to be art of the Comprehensive Plan P P revision and adoption process. • Continuing to provide a community newsletter with information about City affairs and current activities. • Continued development and strengthening of the neighborhood parks system. • Broadcasting City meetings on cable television. N S.T.N. 36 CO. RD. 9 ROSELAWN AVE. r LARPENTEUR AVE. r t p. N M N V � V of -� 1-6% BEAM AVE.— CO. RD. C City of Maplewood 'mof ! COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 911rW 7L Jm7�� 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH y � v s 3 MARYLAND AVE.- STILLWATER RD. m 606 NINNEHANA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.N. 12/1 -94 — UPPER AFTON RD. LOWER AFTON RD. — LONDIN LN. MAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. HIGHWOOD AVE. • � a s .'.. E' z W W 3 N Figure 1 HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY (/ 0 THE LLD GLOSTER STATION (THE INTERSECTION OF THE FORMER BN AI+1[? SO4 LINE TRACKS) (NEAR FROST AND ENGLISH STREETS) 4 HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY The land in what is now Maplewood was originally under the control of the Sioux Indian nation. This land became available to settlers after 1837 when the United States government purchased all the Sioux lands east of the Mississippi; but development was slow. An 1849 census of Little Canada and St. Anthony (Minneapolis) reports: males, 352; females, 219. The first recorded settler in Maplewood was Benjamin Gervais, who farmed and. built a gristmill on Gervais Creek in 1844. So man y other French Canadians followed him that, in 1858, when Minnesota became a state and the townships were organized, the one north of St. Paul was called New Canada Township. This included arts of Maplewood, P P The settlers' farms, for which they had paid the government $2 an acre, were scattered along Maple Street (now called County Road Q, and near the old Indian Trail, (now called Hazelwood Street). They built a log schoolhouse in 1850 at County Road C and White Bear Avenue, and they hired a teacher, Eliza La Boure. However, the Sioux warned off four families who tried to fell trees and build cabins that in 1850. The Sioux insisted the land was still theirs. Not until the Battle Creek fight in 1853, when the Chippewa drove the Sioux south to Newport, were the settlers able to return. Between 1850 and 1870, New Canada Township became settled with pioneers of French and German decent. In 1870, the industrial revolution came to New Canada Township when the St. Paul and Duluth railroad was built from St. Paul to Duluth. In 1887 the first real estate developers, a firm called the Gladstone Land Company, arrived. They platted the Gladstone area not onl y for dwellings, but also for commercial and industrial uses. At that time, two railways ran through Gladstone: the Wisconsin Central and the St. Paul and Duluth, which built its shops there. The other industry was the St. Paul Agricultural Works (a plow factory). That was the year the township that was to be Maplewood got its distinctive shape. The part of McLeod Township lying north of St. Paul and south of New Canada was divided between the two communities, with the new boundary at Larpenteur Avenue. This left amile -wide strip of McLeod Township (McKnight to Century) which was incorporated into New Canada. Also, the residents of the northeast corner withdrew from 5 the township to organize into the village of North St. Paul. The first school was built in Maplewood in 1889 - -a two-story, four -room brick building costing $15,000. The first North St. Paul High School was built in 1902, four years later graduating a class of four. In 1948 the school district west of Arcade Street and south of State Highway 36 became a part of Consolidated * School District 623 (Roseville). The rest of New Canada Township, North St. Paul and parts of Washington County formed Consolidated School District 622 in 1952. Change was in the air. Little Canada incorporated in 1953, leaving New Canada Township with 11,400 acres which by* now contained 14,200 people- -too many to attend annual town meetings. Rapid g rowth had already led to the appointment of a planning commission, adoption of a building code and the enlargement of the two - constable police force. This urbanization was creating pressing problems with sanitary sewer service. The township was seeking efforts to connect to the St. Paul sewer system to get relief from the sewer problems. In 1955, 3M Company built its Central Research Laboratory (the nucleus of its world- wide headquarters which now covers 420 acres and employs 12,000 people) on 150 acres along Highway 12, and a plan was afoot for St. Paul to annex this territory. As a result, in 1957 residents voted to incorporate all of the unincorporated land in the Township of New Canada into the village of Maplewood, spread out over 19 square miles to the north and east of the City of St. Paul. This action retained the 3M property as part of its tax base, the village was eligible for a share of the state gasoline tax, and the resident finally got their sewer services. Waldo Luebben, a resident since the early 1930s, and Chair of the Township Board, automatically became Maplewood's first mayor. The resident's reelected him for a full term in 1958. Gerald Berger, who became a member of the first elected council, first proposed the village name and insignia. Originally " incorporated under Minnesota's Plan A form of government, with the council responsible for administrative as well as legislative functions, the present Plan B form of government, the council - manager system, was adopted by a referendum in 1968. no GOALS OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Maplewood has developed a set of community -wide goals. They are the basis for the City's planning and development efforts. These goals are: • Hwman Rights Goal: The City will positively identify itself . as a community that includes and respects all individuals and s rou g p within it, and will work to improve the human relations climate of the City. The City will work to secure for all citizens equal opportunity regardless of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, creed, marital status, disability, dependence on public assistance, age, or family status. The City will protect citizens' rights and g encourage them to exercise their responsibilities as citizens. • Citizen Involvement Goal: The decisions and actions of City government should consider the needs . and desires of its citizens. The City will provide a wide range of opportunities for citizen participation and community involvement in local decisions. • Communication Goal: The City will encourage and promote communication with the public to achieve a high level of citizen participation and community involvement. • City Implementation Goal: The City will use a rational and democratic system to help the City's citizens, council and management decide about the use of resources. These decisions should help the City achieve it's goals. In order to accomplish the goals listed above, the City has developed the following additional goals: • Cultural- Leisure Activity Goal: The City will encourage or provide opportunities for cultural and leisure activities for all citizens. • Economic Goal: The City will provide a supportive climate for business consistent with orderly development and planning. • Employee Goal: The City will provide and develop highly - motivated, professional, experienced, productive and well - trained employees with high morale and with a stake in the City's future. 7 • Finance Goal: The City will finance its activities in a manner which fosters the City's growth, improves the citizens' lives and assures the City's financial stability. • Health and Welfare Goal: The City will encourage the development and availability of activities that protect the health and welfare of its citizens. • Housing Goal: The City will encourage a variety of housing which provides for a choice of type, location, price and ownership versus. renting. Housing should be safe, sanitary, secure, comfortable, free from blight, with access to public streets, utilities, schools and parks. • Metropolitan Goal: The City will actively participate in finding solutions to metropolitan problems which affect the City or its . Y citizens. • Public Services and Infrastructure Goal: The City will provide and maintain comprehensive, high-quality d cost- effective public Y P services. The City will provide these services in a fair and democratic way. • Safety and Social Order Goal: The City will provide an environment to enjoy life in peace and freedom from criminal acts and preventable disasters. • Significant Natural Features Goal: The City will preserve, conserve and use wisely its significant natural features. Transportation Goal: The City will have a transportation system which is safe, efficient, minimizes disruption, P romotes better land. development, improves the aesthetic appearance of the City and reduces air pollution. This system should provide transportation opportunities for citizens without cars. • Urban Design Goal: The City will strive to improve the appearance of the City, maintain compatible land uses, and encourage a sensitive integration among activities, man -made facilities and the natural environment. These are the City's overall goals. There are also specific goals and policies in each of the Comprehensive Plan elements. NATURAL FEATURES INTRODUCTION Maplewood has many natural features, such as soils slopes, wetlands, woodlots and large trees, which will restrict development d i 1 P es gn. The following lowing maps and text describe these features and show where they are located. Soils and Slopes Figure 2 divides the City into three areas based on the e difficulty of building caused by sods and steep slopes: slight, P pe g moderate or severe. Areas with slight problems would. enerall be g y good for construction. Areas with moderate problems may re quire good manage � g g t and careful design to overcome site limitations. Areas with severe r p oblems may be impossible to develop without special design or sig nificant g g t costs. Trees Figure 3 shows the location of major tree cover. To preserve large trees, the City adopted a tree ordinance that the Builders' Association and environmental groups have endorsed.. This ordinance requires that developers replace large trees they remove. The ordinance also allows the City to increase lot areas to save. trees. The City also has a limited removal program for diseased trees on City land. Wetlands Figures 4 and 5 show the location of major wetlands and fl J oodplains. The Ramsey County Soil Conservation Service has ma and cl ' Aped assified the City's wetlands. (Refer to their publication called "Wetland Areas of the City of Maplewood".) Wetlands provide settling basins for excess runoff and are an excellent habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife. As a result, the County has purchased many of these areas for open space and the City has acquired many of these areas for storm water ponds:.. In some cases, the City has combined these ponds with City parks. The Corps of Engineers, the State Department of Natural Resources and the Ramsey- Washington Metro watershed Board regulate man of the g Y City's wetlands. The City also regulates the filling of wetlands through g its environmental protection ordinance. The City requires the preservation of wetlands that it needs for storm water runoff or water qualit preservation. The City shows the location and size of po nds it needs in the City's storm water management plan. Floodplams Figure 5 shows the location of the floodplains. The City participates in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) flood protection program. FEMA last updated the City's floodplain information in 1986. The City has adopted a floodplain ordinance that regulates all construction in floodplains. The City also has a shoreland ordinance that restricts development around its lakes and streams. The City's zoning ma shows Y g P the areas that the ordinance restricts. These areas are generally within 1,000 feet of the lakes. This varies, however, with each lake. 10 I8 VADNAIS HEIGHTS COMPREHENSIVE P. L A N f 0 1600" 3200' 4800' NORTH so zz 4 vi KeA /n►on �9 LITTLE CANADA .1 W N O 5T. PAUL 'zY This map is for l anni n P g purposes .only and should not be used where Lege nd: preci measurement i s req uired , EaASE OE DEVELOPMENT Slight O R Moderate Severe Soil Limitations Source: Ramsey County Soil Conservation Service Figure 2 NORTH ST PAUL MATCH LINE h- U' _Z Y H Q 3 I10 NEWPORT W J Q a O j /IAPLEWOOD ® V A D NAIS HEIGHTS o k C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N = k W ir 0 1600' 3200' 4800' NORTH NA! _ a 1 � Ell LITTLE CANADA I N z to O a This map is for planning purposes only and should.not be used where precise measurement is required. Tree Cover Figure 3 foils 7 73M MATCH LINE S ` 1 B a 0 J 61 d>t • NEWPORT R M .till = wh. •.�_� - 'i 41 ka. oN c0. .+ M s Y 3M O CO P L A N I z 0 1600' 3200" 4800' NORTH &*Sir AIL W 0 B LITTLE CA14ASA : I Q This map is for plannin purposes onl and should not be used where precise measurement is required. Wetlands Source: Ramse Count Soil Conservation Service Fi 4 Los* Va••40 Come W It 6-00"M an 4A 3 Z $7. PAUL J � , MONTO ST PAUL 29 ", LVI O d lflfln roll 0 0 felt$ do 6F" L 3M OWC14 LOW .Zo eel • 016-4 of V 4024 oft-I 0.1 ••102•4• gods Oil* , M • LI Mit • • 4ftb 24 L 4 .Coi 4 � ..,.fin �-'; �1 . 03 C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N o, 0 1600' 3200' 4800' NORTH =; 60 01 22.. y LOA = LsA O u J � � u J 11 �g LITTLE CANADA S --A 1 -P H 0 ac Floodplain Source: U.S. Department of HUD Figure 5 This map is for planning purposes only and should not be used where precise measurement is required. a 110 i 1 t l • =tr tw -- dQb �.:j AMf Y C _i WASHINGTON CO. FirwpnPT � w M M Y J 3M � �, ANALYSIS OF POPULATION, HOUSING, AND EMPLOYMENT ANALYSIS This section describes and analyzes the major demographic and employment trends which may influence City policy. Table 1 presents historical background and forecasts developed by the Metropolitan Council through the Year 2000, Notes From Table 1 • The City has been steadily growing over the y ears. • Since 1980, the percentage increase in Maplewood's p o p ulation has reflected the rate of growth in the Metropolitan Area and has far outpaced other inner -ring suburbs. • The total number of households in Maplewood increased at a greater rate than in the Twin Cities or in other inner -ring suburbs. The Metropolitan Council expects this trend to continue through the next decade. • Household size has been on the decline for several y ears, but is larger in Maplewood than the metro area or the averse inner-ring g suburb. • The Metropolitan Council expects the rate of increase in employment in Maplewood to be strong into the next century, POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Table 2 presents a summary of the major population characteristics of the City. This table compares Maplewood to data from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area for 1980 and 1990. 15 TABLE 1 POPULATION, HOUSEHOLD AND EMPLOYMENT TRENDS Source: U.S. Census Bureau; Metropolitan Council 16 MAPLEWOOD INNER -RING SUBURBS. METRO AREA # % CHANGE # % CHANGE # % CHARACTERISTICS YEAR FROM 1980 FROM 1980 CHANGE FROM 1980 Population 1960 18,519 1 1970 25 1 1980 26 505 1 1990 30 15 506 0.0 2 15 2000 32,000 19 510, 390 0.8 2 16 Households 1960 4 552 1970 6,495 573 1980 8,806 185 721 1990 11 31 205 14 875,504 21 2000 12 42 212 10 931 29 Persons Per Household 1964 4.20 3.29 1970 3.77 3.19 1980 2.98 2.73 2.71 1990 2.62 2.47 2.56 2000 2.56 2.41 2.48 Employment 1960 2 607,032 1970 8,191 853 1980 20 312, 870 1, 069, 030 1990 27,000 35 373,250 19 1 11 2000 29 45 395 26 1 31 Source: U.S. Census Bureau; Metropolitan Council 16 TABLE 2 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS 17 MAPLEWOOD MAPLEWOOD METRO AREA METRO AREA CHARAC IN 1980 IN 1990 1980 1990 Number of Persons 26 30 1 2,288 721 Persons by Gender Female 51% 51% 51.5% 51% Male 49% 49% 48,95% 49% Number of Families 6 8A46 438 583 Number of Households (occupied) 8 11 721, 444 875,504 Persons Per Household 2.72 2.62 2.75 2.56 Number of Housing Units 9 12,120 750, 228 922, 224 Median Age 28.9 33.5 28.8 31.8 Number of Persons By Age 0-19 34% 27% 32% 28% 20-24 10% 7% 10% 8% 25-34 16% 19% 19% 20% 35-64 33% 35% 30% 34% 65-74 4% 7% 5% 6% 75+ 4% 5% 4% 4% Persons by Race White 95% 94% 95% 92% Non -White 5% 6% 5% 8% Households by Tv�De Family Households Married Couples 67% 60% 58% 54% Female Householder 10% 11% 9% 10% Male Householder 2% 3% 2% 3% Non - Family Households 21% 26% 31% 33% Households with Persons Under Age 18 Married Couple Family 82% 77% 81% 77% Other Family Female Householder 15% 16% 15% 16% Male Householder 2% 3% 3% 3% Non- Family 1 % 4% 1 % 4% 17 TABLE 2 POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS fi:3 MAPLEWOOD MAPLEWOOD METRO AREA METRO AREA CHARACTERISTICS IN 1980 IN 1990 IN 1980 IN 1990 Related Children By Age Under 5 Years Old 24% 31% 31% 31% 5 to 17 Years Old 76% 69% 69% 69% Family Incomes Median $23 $24 Mean $25 $23 Employed Persons 16 and Over by Occupation Managerial and Professional 23% 26% Technical, Sales, Administration 35% 35% J Service 12% 13% Farming, Forestry, Fishing 1 % 1 Of- Precision Production, Craft 12% 10% Operations, Fabrications, Laborers 17% 15% fi:3 POPULATION ]IF FULLY DEVELOPED The City estimates that the population of - Maplewood, if all residentially-planned lanned areas are P YP developed, will be about 40,891. This estimate is based on the number of undeveloped acres . p of land shown in Table 4 by residential category. The City assumed that the number of dwelling units per gross acres would be 2.3, 6 and 14.3 for low- medium- and hi h -density g housing, respectively. The City ased the 2.3 units per gross acre for low-density residential t p gr ty development on the typical new single- family subdivision in Maplewood. The City based the 6 and 14.3 units per gross acre for medium and high density residential development from the numbers in Table 5. The number of persons p er housin g unit was estimated at 2.9 2.2 and 1.6 for those categories, respectively. The resulting additional future as o ulation w p.p calculated at about 9,937. The Cit determined the fully developed population by adding 9,937 to the 1990 population of 30,954. 19 LAND USE PLAN PURPOSE The Land Use Plan interrelates with all element • s, goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The u se of the • P � e Land Use Plan is to designate the type,. location and density of land u • . ty u ses m the City. In doing this, the City considered the following tems: g a. Community goals and objectives. b. Natural Features. C. Supportive elements, such as transportation, drain .. l� age systems and utilities, d. Existing and future problems. e. Coordination with surrounding communities and .. g metropolitan facilities. ��A �� The City government has a strong influence on the way a community develops. Community facilities and laws can stimulate or retard development. While the workings of the real estate market help determine the uses of land, these uses are regulated by City government. The City is the only entity with an opportunity to coordinate overall development in the City. The following are the City's overall land use oa • g is. • Provide for orderly development. • Protect and strengthen neighborhoods. 20 • Promote economic development that will expand the ro ert P p y tax base, increase jobs and provide desirable services. • Preserve significant natural features where practical. • Minimize the land planned for streets. • Minimize conflicts between land uses. • Prevent premature use, overcrowding or overuse of land especially when supportive services and facilities, such as utilities, drainage systems or streets, are not available, • Provide a wide variety of housing types. • Provide safe and attractive neighborhoods and commercial areas. • Integrate developments with open space areas, communit facilities and significant natural features. • Maintain and upgrade environmental ualit and where � y , needed, reclassify land uses. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following general development policies are intended to implement the previous goals: • The City will not approve new development without providin for adequate public facilities , services, such as streets, utilities, drainage, parks and pen space. • Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties. • Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical imp on . . adjoining developments. • whenever possible, changes in types of land use should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. 21 • The City requires all development to meet state and federal laws, including Minnesota Pollution Control Agenc y (WCA) regulations, unless the developer gets a variance from the regulating agency. • The City may require that a developer do sound tests to verify compliance with WCA regulations. • The City requires drainage and erosion control plans with new developments. Such plans shall not increase the rate of runoff and shall prevent erosion. • Grading and site plans should preserve as many significant natural features as practical. • The City will not remove land from the tax rolls unless it is in the public interest. • The City supports the improvement, replacement or redevelopment of substandard or incompatible development. • The City coordinates its planning with neighboring communities. • The City applies its development policies and ordinances consistently and uniformly. • The City coordinates land use changes with the character of each neighborhood. • The City regulates development near or the alteration of natural drainage systems to manage storm water runoff. • The City uses the Ramsey County Soil Survey to identify areas with soils that are not suitable for building sites. • The City may require the developer to furnish evidence from a registered soils engineer that areas with soil problems can be developed as proposed. • The City considers the recommendations of the four Watershed organizations in the review of development requests. 22 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following are the City's residential development policies: • Plan residential neighborhoods, with schools and parks as the hub. Natural or man -made physical barriers should not traverse, but set the boundaries of the neighborhood. • Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing and low- and moderate- income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing. • Disperse low- and moderate- income developments throughout the City, rather than concentrating them in one area or neighborhood. Such housing should be near to bus lines or have access to other public transportation. • Support innovative subdivision and housing design. • Protect neighborhoods from activities which produce excessive noise, dirt, odors or which generate heavy traffic. • Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. COM2VIERCLALL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES The following are the City's commercial and industrial development policies: • Group compatible businesses in suitable areas. • Provide attractive surroundings in which to shop and work. • Require adequate off - street loading facilities. • Promote the j oint use of parking areas, drives and trash containers. • Avoid disruption of adjacent residential areas. • Use planned unit developments. (PUDs) wherever .practical. Maintain orderly transitions between commercial and residential areas. • Require commercial and industrial developers to make all necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. • Require adequate screening or buffering of new or expanded commercial areas from any adjacent existing . or planned residential development. • Restrict commercial development which will result in traffic volumes which are beyond the capacity of the road systems or generate excessive noise or pollution as defined by state standards. • Plan land uses and streets to route nonresidential traffic around residential neighborhoods. EXISTING LAND USE The City has a variety of land uses, ranging from a regional mall to parks and open space. Table 3 gives a breakdown by acreage and relative percentage of the basic land use classifications from 1975 - 19840 24 TABLE 3 LAND USE TRENDS, 1975 - 1984 % of % of % of 1975 Total 1980 Total 1984 Total Residential 3506 30 -- -- -- -- (all types) Single Dwellings 3438 30 3503 30 Multiple Dwellings -- -- 181 2 213 2 Public & Recreation 1646 14 -- -- -- -- Public & Semi - Public -- -- 638 5 640 6 Recreation -- -- 1023 9 1023 9 Streets 298 3 298 3 317 3 Industrial 361 3 389 3 401 3 Commercial 425 4 459 4 530 5 Lakes 410 3 410 3 410 - 3 Undeveloped 4908 43 4718 41 4517 39 Source: Metropolitan Council Figure 6 is a map of the 1991 pattern of land use. Residential Land Use Most of the City's residential development is single dwellings. They make up 30 percent of the total land area. The rest of the residential land is a mixture of multiple dwellings and manufactured home parks. Most of the older homes are in the Gladstone Neighborhood. They are 1-1/2 story expansion homes built after World War II. The City has recently seen the construction of higher - valued homes in the lower leg and the area northwest of Kohlman Lake, The City has a variety of multiple dwellings, ranging from owner - occupied condominiums to rental apartments. In addition, there are five manufactured home parks. Commercial Land Use Maplewood has been one of the top cities in the metro area in retail building permit valuation over the last 10 -15 years. The primary commercial center in the City is the Maplewood Mall area which is at White Bear Avenue and I -694. This mall provides regional, as well as 25 M A P I,E W OOD Rm I SER 0 N it ` IOU'' W, NO "At a WN .1 KV RINI ,U ww% MOM �..M v-,glm a !-ew Wdl r. X v � � ' -_ _ N 0 0 RAW 7 ���- a .;_- _ � A I'Ll 1 9 le w -.. --%; ON I NNE R W L g s m IN ® 00, RN-N RE Z rilirm I N SR N, Wl ME N MINOR ggl, IN, m \�k - - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 r t W 1* 1 Lz_ S IR N Z Nm cg ON EYE. NNO! % Zo, A 77, ON 00 iNg 0 R g &N R n m �46 Im m j ure b VA%,oA[M I LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUMMIGH DENSITY RESID 0 OPEN SPACE, RECREATIONAL, PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC BUILDI COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL 11 [IV -inn-4 le w -.. --%; ON I NNE R W L g s m IN ® 00, RN-N RE Z rilirm I N SR N, Wl ME N MINOR ggl, IN, m \�k - - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 r t W 1* 1 Lz_ S IR N Z Nm cg ON EYE. NNO! % Zo, A 77, ON 00 iNg 0 R g &N R n m �46 Im m j ure b ar as w 41 *1 i r w o City of Maplewood c: o E s L N •a.. �..n M � � ! 1. • , � •1i t r. - Toe I�IW ..s f.r►: - ttltao �/ .. REAM AVE.— 7 3 •• a .1 8 r w0 Co. RD \i ♦/ . .. a l�� _.. - - ls s 0>r Y • s dal" , • l�d01/. - \. ....� � 1100A t.T.N. 36 awrow I aw• r r a l • ' 1 ROMLAYN AVE. LARPENTEUR AVE. M r s i Ws I . � M N D M l {.•aM op , 1ss4N Imo • p W YI '. NARYLAND AVE. I .1 it ' • tT I LLWATER RD. to u DEVEL OPED LAND 91INNENANA AVE. .• Planned Residential Uses If AVE. T .M. 14018 ~ �{ w UPPER AFTON RD. 00 rs LOWER AFTON RD. LOND I N LN: - -- -- is NA I LAID RD. NO " Iti 1. _ 4 L I NIA AVE. Jr NIGNWOOD AVE. 006 • , t. •» tOp1 l~ C=VI1s was 1! 1 C 0 M P R E H E I V AN 12/31/90 it M 27 Figure 7 -MAPLEWOOD,- G 0 M P R E H E N S I V E PLAN UPPER AFTON RD. 14 Cit of s o • s to 0. Cl LONER AFTON RD..- � LONDIN LN. -- u Ono _.. N '+ D c 111110POW MAN JAW If -- -- 6 low 8 L I NWOOD AVE . -not 17 low AwNwrl NI GHIM AVE. M1116— 00o a 18009 can= son a. aoo s w.oa '�... � N.o • to = ! +taw to • N�OI � - -ALL + � � .IMiMpI7t� Cd M/0 ! �E vi Imi Co 0 C t 7 r rFLI MAMA I . Wait. Sam swo R AVE. s ONO LARPOENRUR AVE r - •- [,a an s = 42 us - ts MIARYLAND AVE E �+ o STILLWATER ., CI w UNDEVELOPED LAND NIMMUNA AVE.— �A CMMY AVE ,- . _ g Planned Commercial/industrial. Uses -MAPLEWOOD,- G 0 M P R E H E N S I V E PLAN UPPER AFTON RD. 14 00 14 LONER AFTON RD..- � LONDIN LN. -- u '+ D MAILAND 10. 8 L I NWOOD AVE . -not 17 •• r �t NI GHIM AVE. &IL 00o a 18009 can= aoo s w.oa '�... � N.o • to = ! +taw to • N�OI � - -ALL + � � .IMiMpI7t� Cd M/0 ! 12/31/90 e ( ! W K L � J V N Figure 8 community shopping. It has generated additional retail development around it. The City also has smaller shopping centers at Rice Street and Larpenteur Avenue, white Bear and Gervais Avenues, White Bear and Larpenteur Avenues, Larpenteur Avenue and McKnight Road, and Highway 36 and English Street. There are several other areas with separate commercial buildings. The area along Highway 61, north of Highway 36 to White Bear Lake, is known for its car dealerships. Industrial Land. Use The City does not have an industrial park. The largest industrial use is the 3M Company. Maplewood is the world headquarters for 3M. They use the Maplewood campus for corporate office, research and development buildings. There is additional light industrial and warehouse uses along Highway 36. Public and Semi -Public Use This classification includes municipal buildings, schools, churches, non- profit clubs and hospitals. Maplewood is home for St. John's Hospital Northeast, which has been steadily expanding for several years. Olen Space and Recreational Uses The City has a variety of open space and recreational areas. This includes parks, wetlands and cemeteries. The parks chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the recreational uses in detail. The County has also purchased a significant amount of land for parks and along drainage areas for permanent open space. Undeveloped Land In spite of being afirst -ring suburb, the City has a surprising amount of undeveloped land left. About 24 percent of the City is still undeveloped. The City has planned most of the undeveloped land for residential use. Table 7 shows the acreage of land by neighborhood and by land use that is undeveloped. Figures 7 and 8 show where the undeveloped land is. 29 LAND USE PLAN The City land use plan: • Incorporates the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan into a spatial arrangement of land use patterns. • Implements the neighborhood planning concept. • Considers the existing land use pattern, the topography and physical features of the community. • Coordinates and relates the City's major street plan with the land use plan. • Includes the community facilities necessary to serve the planned land uses. • Plans residential uses as the major land use within the City. • Provides enough area for commercial development to accommodate the population. NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING CONCEPT The Plan identifies thirteen neighborhood planning areas. However, the City has planned each neighborhood to fit into the community -wide plan for the City. The City has planned its neighborhoods because of: • The need to recognize the physical impediments, such as freeways, lakes, railroads and political boundaries, which delineate areas of the City. � The need to strengthen citizen identity with their neighborhood. • The need to provide a focal point for bringing people together to discuss local problems of mutual concern and thereby develop stronger citizen involvement in community affairs. #2006 3 TABLE 4 NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN LEGEND Residential Land Uses RE -40 Residential Estate (40,000- square -foot lot areas) RE -30 Residential Estate (30,000- square -foot lot areas) RE -20 Residential Estate (20, lot areas) R -1 Single Dwelling (10,000-square-foot lot areas) R -1S Single Dwelling (7,500 - square -foot lot areas) R -2 Single and Double Dwellings R 3L Multiple Dwellings. (5.0 - 8.5 units /acre) R -3M Multiple Dwellings (5.5 - 9.5 units /acre) R -3H Multiple Dwellings (9.5 - 16.3 units /acre) Commercial Land Uses LBC Limited Business Commercial Center NC Neighborhood. Commercial Center CO Commercial Office Center BC(M) Business Commercial (Modified) Center BC Business and Commercial Center Industrial Land Uses M -1 Light Manufacturing M -2 Heavy Manufacturing Community Service Land Uses OS Open Space P Parks S School C Church W Public Water Facility CEM Cemetery FS Fire Station G Government Facility L Library CH City Hall #2005 31 In applying the neighborhood planning concept to the community, the City used the following guidelines: • Streets: The neighborhood planning areas, where possible,. are bounded by major streets which move traffic around, instead of through the neighborhood. • Parks: Neighborhoods include parks that the City has designed to meet the needs of the particular neighborhood. • Schools: School sites have been combined with the neighborhood recreation area, whenever possible, to provide a focal point for the neighborhood. • Commercial: Commercial uses are generally at the edge of residential neighborhoods or at the intersection of arterial streets. LAND USE PLAN DEFR*4MONS Most of the land use plan categories coordinate with the City's zoning categories. The uses permitted in these land use categories are the same as those in the corresponding zoning district. There is a list of categories in Table 4. The City and developers may also use planned unit developments (PUDs) when proposing or reviewing developments. The proposed land use(s) in a PUD must be consistent with the Land Use Plan. The City may require a PUD in areas of significant natural features, difficult topography or transition areas between largely different zoning districts. RESIDFNTLAL LAND USES The Land Use Plan has ten residential classifications. The main difference between the single - dwelling classifications is the minimum lot sizes allowed. The difference between the three multiple- dwelling classifications is the maximum allowed density. Table 5 shows the maximum number of people per gross acre allowed. Gross acreage is the total area of the lot to be developed, including streets and drainage areas. Table 5 also shows the number of people per unit that the City uses in converting the people per gross acre to units per gross acre. If someone simply wants to know how many units of a certain type of dwelling they can build, they should use Table 5. #2006 32 TABLE 5 - ESTEkIATED PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT AND PLANNED MAXIMUM DENSITY OF DWELLING UNITS RL RM RH People /Gross Acre (approximate) 11.9 13.3 _ 22.8 Type of Dwelling People /Unitl Planned Maximum Density (Units per gross acre) Single Dwellingz 2.9 4.1 4.6 -- Double Dwellings 2.2 5.4 6.0 10.4 Townhomes 2.2 5.4 6.0 10.4 Manufactured Homes 2.0 6.0 6.7 11.4 Apartments (3 -4 units /bldg.) 2.4 5.0 5.5 9.5 Apartments (5 -9 units /bldg.) 2.2 5.4 6.0 10.4 Apartments (10-.19 units /bldg.) 1.9 6.3 7.0 12.0 Apartments (20 -49 units /bldg.) 1.6 7.4 8.3 14.3 Apartments (50+ units /bldg.) 1.4 8.5 9.5 16.3 Apartments (1- bedroom senior) 1.1 (Based on bedroom mix.) Apartments (2- bedroom senior) 2.0 (Based on .bedroom mix.) Apartments (3- bedroom senior) 2.5 (Based on bedroom mix.) Notes: (1) From the 1990 census. (2) The City shall determine the maximum allowed density by the minimum -lot areas in the zoning code. The City shall determine the maximum number of units from Table 5 if minimum -area lots for each unit are not platted. The City may allow reduced minimum lot areas in planned unit developments (PUDs) where the overall PUD project does not exceed the maximum allowed density. (3) The City intends to review the density figures in Table 5 after each federal census. #2006 33 Low - density areas are usually for single dwellings. The City may allow an occasional double dwelling. Double dwellings, however, should be on high - volume streets at the periphery of single- dwelling neighborhoods. The City may also allow multiple dwellings in. low- density areas with a planned unit development if: 1. Clustering buildings would preserve significant natural features, such as woods, wetlands or steep slopes. 2. The buildings are of a scale, design and location that is compatible with adjacent development. Medium - density areas are for small -lot single dwellings, manufactured home parks and multiple dwellings. These areas usually abut single dwellings or are in neighborhoods where higher density would cause traffic or other problems for surrounding development or City facilities. High- density residential is for a variety of multiple dwellings where a higher density will not adversely affect surrounding development. CONDAERCIAL LAND USES There are five commercial land use classifications: • Limited Business Commercial (LBC). This classification includes offices, medical clinics, and child -care facilities. This classification is intended for commercial areas adjacent to residential uses. • Neighborhood Commercial Center (NC). This classification is intended for businesses that are compatible with adjacent residential neighborhoods. The City limits uses to offices and smaller retail uses that cater to convenience shopping. • Commercial Office (CO). The commercial office classification provides areas for offices and related uses together with supportive, low- intensity commercial uses. These areas should be close to residential .areas so they can conveniently serve the public. These areas should be on heavily traveled streets or adjacent to commercial or industrial districts, to lessen their impact on residential areas. • Business Commercial (Modified). The City intends this classification as a transition between more intensive commercial uses and low -or medium- density residential areas. #2005 34 • Business and Commercial (BC). This commercial classification includes a wide variety of commercial uses. The City may permit high - intensity uses, such as fast -food restaurants and gas stations, subject to specific performance guidelines. I 10 K-843 9 VIA K&A a WL*i There are two industrial land use classifications: • Light Manufacturing (M -1). This classification includes warehouses, wholesale businesses, offices, cartage and express facilities, radio and television stations and other industrial uses of a lower- intensity nature. • Heavy. Manufacturing (M -2). This classification includes higher intensity manufacturing and industrial uses. 3M has the only M -2 land in the City now. LAND USE ACTION PLAN Table 6 lists activities that the City should undertake to implement the Land Use Plan. This table also shows the responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for .each activity. #2006 35 TABLE 6 LAND USE ACTION PLAN Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Allow rezonings consistent PC, CC, Ongoing None Site Plan review; with the Land Use Plan Dir of CD street system Review commercial, industrial PC, CC, CDRB, Ongoing None Land Use Plan; and multi - family site plans HRA, Dir of CD zoning ordinance Protect residential PC, CC, CDRB, Ongoing TIF, GF, Land Use Plan; neighborhoods HRA, Dir of CD CDBG zoning ordinance ABBREVIATIONS: CDRB = Community Design Review Board PC= Planning Commission CC = City Council HRA = Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority Dir of CD = Director of Community Development TIF = Tax- increment financing GF = General Fund CDBG = Community Development Block Grant #2006 36 TABLE 7 PLANNED LAND USE ACREAGE 1991 NOTE: The figures in the left -hand column of each of the categories indicate the number of acres of land expected in that category by neighborhood at time of full development. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of acres of undeveloped land in 1991. p #2005 37 Low- Density Medium - Density High - Density Commercial Open Neighborhood Residential Residential Residential Industrial Space TOTAL RL RM RH 1. Western Hills 159 (0) 2 (0) 60 (0) 132 (42) 175 528 2. Parkside 585 (11) 44 (5) 47 (21) 30 (0) 235 941 3. Kohlman Lake 365 (168) 30 (11) 0 (0) 88 (60) 222 705 4. Hazelwood 469 (47) 40 (2) 34 (15) 750 (355) 300 1,593 5. Maplewood 242 (7) 100 (35) 4 (0) 54 (1'n 100 500 Heights 6. Sherwood Glen 415 (5) 55 (21) 15 (3) 128 (160) 270 883 7. Gladstone 455 (7) 32 (22) 6 (0) 55 (8) 205 753 8. Hillside 349 (54) 193 (136) 7 (4) 95 (55) 470 1,114 9. Beaver Lake 394 (2) 258 (62) 30 (5) 637 (42) 230 1 10. Battle Greek 149 (0) 0 (0) 6 (0) 30 (0) 538 723 11. Vista Hills 244 (62) 104 (25) 2 (0) 7 (1) 182 539 12. Highwood 731 (241) 0 (0) 0 (U) 9 (0) 180 920 13. Carver Ridge 352 (90) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 89 441 4 (694) 858 (319) 211 (48) 2 (740) 3,196 11 NOTE: The figures in the left -hand column of each of the categories indicate the number of acres of land expected in that category by neighborhood at time of full development. The figures in parentheses indicate the number of acres of undeveloped land in 1991. p #2005 37 TABLE 8 FULLY DEVELOPED POPULATION BY NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD 1990 POPULATION FULLY DEVELOPED POPULATION RL RM RH TOTAL 1. Western Hills 1471 572 26 873 1471 2. Parkside 4409 3572 481 975 5028 3. Kohlman Lake 1226 2133 357 0 2490 4. Hazelwood 2612 2538 228 529 3295 5. Maplewood Heights 2421 1549 1300 80 2929 6. Sherwood Glen 3386 2721 712 334 3767 7. Gladstone 3250 3027 422 137 3586 8. Hillside 2688 2257 2517 160 4934 9. Beaver Lake 4698 2173 2958 .515 5646 10. Battle Creek 1470 1270 0 200 1470 11. Vista Hills 2100 1143 1642 20 2845 12. Highwood 1099 2706 0 0 2706 13. Carver Ridge 124 724 0 0 724 TOTALS 30,954 26,385 10,643 3863 40 NOTE: The City estimated the fully developed population by adding the 1990 population to an estimate of additional population. The City estimated the additional population using the undeveloped residential acreages in Table 7 and the population densities on page 19. #2005 38 Z -i!4 t Neighborhood Planning Areas C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N ff t 0 860 1720 3.440 5160 FT. NORTH 39 CAR M Aw • commm. 13 I � w M Figure 9 sun Ava LMAN E W• RD• Q f•!•!• 36 KELLER LAKE I F- U /�� W• M• awalaw Avs - . 90UND LAKE \/ _ �� ��• PHAI.N F � IAKF- • • M g PLANNING AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUMBER NAME � Fa 1 WESTERN HILLS ez'Z 3tD• 2 PARKSIDE C v 3 KOHLMAN LAKE 4 HAZELWOOD f 5 MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS cows ays. 6 _ , SHERWOOD GLEN 7 GLADSTONE 8 HILLSIDE 9 BEAVER LAKE O 10 BATTLE CREEK ZAN= a"m sa• 11 VISTA HILLS tcmaZY Lis -12 HIGHWOOD 13 CARVER YaILi�D !D. 1 RIDGE Lz�oo® ays. Neighborhood Planning Areas C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N ff t 0 860 1720 3.440 5160 FT. NORTH 39 CAR M Aw • commm. 13 I � w M Figure 9 Rd _ H Q ot-4nrF 1 � R -2CM _ o_05 /1A ME No ME ME s' No ME-00 i .Ir r ;rp 1 d� Ell st. Pa►"\ 11 1 Imajcpf arperiay 1 1 11 I o - n /I►�1 �a a r �I' I► ti � ®1 1 •. `�,a ff r i 1 1F n n 1 o 0 6 v � � B u 3 c� i - o = i • I rw 00 .0 ME NMI °" _ _ ■ saw■ a .. El v® ' �. AUM i 1 1 1 1 1!; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ L KOHLMAN LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 3 42 N Figure 12 e • Iii ---- - Q3�ARM ' 4 `!!!...... --- • IN 7=-! e • • i • y • ■ • • B s maj c IQ MALL • • -- s . 00 BC ► M �,A, • e I Ma5 W � � ��� ► � . ■ I �.�. -,ter. AW , 1.111' • -� _ °ice i 1 JIM I � • - � r► Awl - � • � 1 e� 01 1 i S i �� _ � � �!!• �! ��i q .ice . I ' • ■ 0 HAZELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER L 43 N Figure 13 • • ca 0 o - �'� , ,,, ■iii■ � f ZA, goo Fros ►�����ii •�. �O�Illlli ii�i�iii -��'. ' `� �■ iii �- o' �■If � ��`�,: L .. _ . _ h J .� � � >� ■u �� i L__ . VIII ■11 I< 1�L� � R � i� tom: � o� �e : -. �1 I �B�■ ■ ■�� � i PA PARX .� F- �� ■ - �} a �/ � ■ �_■ 1 i, ��•� Wakefield Ri Lake os Lake PARK -' o • - • •' co NC • Saint Paul CO) al e � • • R EVISE D GLADSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 7 46 N Figure 16 .........._. Mc Knight HILLSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 8 47 4 N Figure 17 • MR NOW Her' �, �. ._ 1111 mis 0 1111 INS" • no MORMON MINI III 411 Sol mm 11111■ ��� �� 111 o® 1011111 ■■� �� �� ' a•. �� � tea■ ■ � t� , MEN mm 111111 1111111 2114111 111111 mm mm mm 111111 mm mm major collector i �� 1 1 f-1-11-2113 6 1 IN oil I o I A I I I arterial ► ice •.,• BATTLE CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUM 10 49 Fi 19 VISTA HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11 50 Figure 20 i N1 minor collector — — minor l . I to) IL collector (D L D . � �r i� l l l l[ 1 1! 1 1 1! 1 1 1! 1 ■ ■� 1! I l l l l f �l■■�� i l i t ■■ ■ 11� •• VISTA HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11 50 Figure 20 Linw ood 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! I ! I ! l E 7 ■ I I I i l l r r r r r r r r " r AIMENIM ONE cc ca ca ••,, :: 0 E ♦i N OR S am r ° - .� • MEN - minor INS EM f ii �� •�; Carver -jIlect .o cr REVISED ---� J 0 a� I 1 1 1 .1 v L OS 1 ._ I I 1 A HIGHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 12 - N 51 Figure 21 ! 1 FM 71" F7 REVISED HIGHWC00 AVE LL Mt VE: ut !/ I ut � NEMiTL AVE W 2 1 SO 1GRE T -v ° I J 1£ z 7 0 AVE 1 0 os Carver Ave. i if or olle t r ♦ R-- 1 J os R-- 1 0 � I z I � p a major �co lector i i J � L I ~ - R 1 o I 0 " o E 1 � � I ° ci ICI Newport CARVER RIDGE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 13 52 4 N Figure 22 HOUSING PLAN PURPOSE The intent of the Housing Plan is: Describe the current housing stock. • Quantify the number of housing units by type. Describe the services and amenities which affect the quality and desirability of neighborhoods. • Set goals for affordable housing and a mix of housing types to meet the life -cycle housing needs of Maplewood residents. • Identify strategies for achieving those goals. HOUSING STOCK The overall condition of the City's housing units is good, although there are small areas that have houses with the potential to deteriorate. To prevent this, the Cit y adopted a housing maintenance code which enables officials to require owners to maintain and make basic repairs to their structures. The City has also adopted a "Truth -in- Housing" ordinance. The City designed this ordinance to help buyers make an informed decision. Construction During the 1980s A total of 2,894 housing units were built during the 1980s in Maplewood. Slightly more - than 50 percent of these were town house, duplex and other multi- family units. There are a total of 12,120 housing units in the City (1990 Census), with single -family detached units representing about 63 percent (7636 units) of the housing stock. (See Table 9.) 1988 data from the Metropolitan Council reveals that 21 percent of Maplewood's housing stock was built between 1980 and 1988. Although this figure is comparable to the Metropolitan Area average, it is more than twice the rate for other inner -ring suburbs. 53 TABLE 9 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS 54 1980 1990 1980 1990 MAPLEWOOD MAPLEWOOD METRO METRO CHARACTERISTIC AREA AREA Total Number of Housing Units 9,042 12 796,508 922 224 Units by Type of Occupancy - Owner- Occupied 74% 72% 64% 64% Renter - Occupied 23% 23% 32% 31% Vacant 3% 5% 4% 5% Households by Type of Occupancy - Owner- Occupied 74% 69% 66% 68% Renter - Occupied 26% 31% 34% 32% Median Value of Owner- Occupied Units $64,600 $87,800 $64,100 Median Rent $268 $473 $255 $450 Persons in Units Lacking Complete 0.37% 0.77% Plumbing Number of Vacant, Boarded Units 0.03% 0.10% 0.01% 0,10% (3 units) (13 units) 54 TABLE 9 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS (Continued) Source: U.S. Census Bureau Metropolitan Council Apartment Profiles, Median Rent, 3/90 6161 INNER- RING METRO CHARACTERISTIC MAPLEWOOD SUBURBS AREA Rental Units Vacant for 6 Months or More ( 1980) 0, 0.26% Year Housing Units Built, 1989 Pre - 1940 6% 8% 22% 1940-1959 28% 37% 22% .1960-1979 45% 45% 39% 1980- 1989 21% 11% 17% Housing Units by Type, 12- -31 -88 Single-Family 63% 64% 61% Multi- Family 25% 31% 34% Townhouse 6% 3% 4% Manufactured 6% 2% 2% Housing Source: U.S. Census Bureau Metropolitan Council Apartment Profiles, Median Rent, 3/90 6161 While the number of manufactured homes in Maplewood declined in the late 1970s, this trend reversed in the 1980s with the addition of 375 new units. The City now has five manufactured home parks containin g 751 units, which represents 6 percent of the City's housing stock. This rate is three times higher than that found in other inner -ring suburbs or in the Metro Area. Owner-OgLupied Versus Renter-Ocgupied Housing Units Maplewood has a higher than average percentage of owner - occupied housing units than in the Metro Area or in other first-ring suburbs. In 1980, 74 percent of the units were owner,- occupied; down from 79 percent in 1970. The 1990 Census showed a decrease to 72 p ercent from the 74 percent in 1980 in the percentage of home ownership. Housing Affordability The price and rent of Maplewood housing is only slightly above the metropolitan mean and median. There is also a diversity of styles and price ranges. Older homes on smaller lots provide opportunities for first- time buyers in the Western Hills, Parkside and Gladstone neighborhoods. Opportunities for. low- and moderate- income households are available in manufactured home parks and in a varie ty y of t pes and locations of multiple dwellings. The move -up housing market is particularly strong with such choices available throughout the City. Buyers can find more expensive housing in the Vista Hills, Highwood and Kohlman Lake neighborhoods. Housing Maplewood participates in several programs that assist _households in the Cit The Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority manages the Rehabilitation Loan Program, the Section 8 and Section 236 Rental Assistance Programs, In 1990, the Section 8 Rent Assistance Program helped 180 households (36 senior and 144 family), which represents a small portion of the low - income households living in Maplewood. This program does not come close to meeting the need for affordable housing in Maplewood or elsewhere. This is because the Federal Government has reduced levels of funding annually throughout the 1980s. Moreover, the 1990s may also witness the expiration of many long -term Federal contracts with landlords for the set -aside of units used in this program. 56 In addition to the individual system of vouchers, there are four complexes providing subsidized housing for families and the elderly: Archer Heights, 1816 Beebe Road; Maplewood Gardens, 410 South McKnight Road; Maple Knolls, 1880 Mesabi Road (south of Radatz between White Bear and Southlawn); and Concordia Arms, 2030 Lydia, Information on the current number and type of subsidized housing units is shown on the accompanying Tables 10 and 11. Maplewood participates in four loan programs funded by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and managed by local lenders. These include the Home Improvement Loan Program, the Home Energy Loan Program, the MHFA Single- Family Mortgage Loan Program, and the Home Ownership Assistance Fund. Maplewood has also provided money to the Share -a -Home program. managed by the Lutheran Social Services Administration. This program matches individuals looking for an inexpensive place to live with elderly homeowners who need help to remain in their homes. Development Ordinances The Maplewood zoning Ordinance includes seven districts which permit single- family detached housing. The minimum lot areas. range from 7,500 to 40,000 square feet. The R -2 district also allows two- family dwellings, and the R -3 district permits multi - family developments ranging upwards from. four units per acre. In recent years, the City has adopted many ordinances which effect development and housing. These include a Shoreland Overlay District to protect shoreland areas, an Environmental Protection Ordinance to protect areas of significant natural features, a pipeline setback ordinance to protect buildings from pipeline leaks, and a housing maintenance code. The City has also adopted a "truth -in- housing" ordinance. The City designed this ordinance to help purchasers make an informed decision and may also promote privately negotiated housing repairs at the time of sale. The City requires sellers to have an inspection done which discloses information about the property, and highlight any potential repair needs or housing code deficiencies. 57 TABLE 10 SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UNITS, 1990 Source: "Changes in the Subsidized Housing Market in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 198.0- 1989," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council TABLE 11 SECTION 8 AND SECTION 236 UNITS Archer Privately Certificates Concordia Type of. Unit Heights Gardens Community Public Housing: Owned Housing: and Vouchers Total Subsidized Units: Family Units Mixed Elderly Total Mixed Elderly Total Mixed Elderly Total Mixed Elderlv Total 3 -- 71 Two Bedroom 47 13 32 -- 92 Three Bedroom Maplewood 16 207 193 400 144 36 180 351 229 580 Ramsey County 1,630 2 4,224 3,345 2,511 5 2 982 3,353 7 6 13 Metro Area 3 8 12 10 9 20 8 3 11 22,995 21 44,366 Source: "Changes in the Subsidized Housing Market in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, 198.0- 1989," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council TABLE 11 SECTION 8 AND SECTION 236 UNITS Elderly Units One Bedroom 69 -- -- 124 193 Source: City of Maplewood, 1990 Archer Maplewood Maple Concordia Type of. Unit Heights Gardens Knolls Arms Totals Family Units One Bedroom 68 -- 3 -- 71 Two Bedroom 47 13 32 -- 92 Three Bedroom 6 16 20 -- 42 Handicapped -- -- 2 -- 2 121 29 57 -- 207 Elderly Units One Bedroom 69 -- -- 124 193 Source: City of Maplewood, 1990 New Housing The addition of nearly 2,900 housing units from 1980 through 1989 increased the supply of housing by 30 percent. Still, nearly 22 percent of the land planned for residential use remains undeveloped, providing areas for continuing new construction in the coming years.. Much of this land is in the City's southern "leg." The undeveloped land is the reason the Metropolitan Council projects a population increase of 19 percent between 1980 and 2000. This compares with a 0.8 percent growth rate for all inner -ring suburbs. As development continues, though, the available land will be increasingly difficult to develop because of environmental constraints, such as steep slopes, poor soils, or wetlands. The challenge for the City will be to continue to allow for the development of a range of housing options for its citizens on the undeveloped sites. Expected Housing Market Trends In recent years, the Metropolitan Council has produced several studies examining potential changes in the region's demographics and what these changes might mean for the housing market. This research suggests that major changes in the composition of the population will affect the nation and the state over the next ten to thirty years. These changes will also affect the Twin Cities and Maplewood. The large group of baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1965, sharply boosted housing production during the 1970s and 1980s, as they formed new households. A generation has followed the baby boomers that is smaller in numbers. As these two groups move through their life cycles, they will change the housing market:. • There may be less demand for rental housing as the typical renter age group moves into owner - occupied structures. an the other hand, the elderly may be looking to move from owner - occupied units to rental units. This may off -set the decline in nonelderly rentals. • There may be less demand for new housing by the late 1990s, because there will be fewer new households. As a result, it may become more difficult to sell entry -level housing. 59 • Household composition may shift. The U. S. Census Bureau estimates that, between 1985 and 2000, 69 percent of the growth in new households will be in nontraditional households. Almost 14 percent will be in female, single- parent families whose median income is less than half the regional median. Of these, more than 30 percent will be living in poverty. This ma y y not only affect the housing market, but may also place a greater strain on the public to provide more affordable housing options. • There may be less subsidized housing. The changing household structure is occurring when the future of much of the region's subsidized housing is unclear. During the 1990s, more than 5,000 contracts for subsidized units between the federal government and investment housing owners will expire. It is unknown whether or not the Federal government will replace these contracts. • Rehabilitation needs may increase. The Metropolitan Council estimates that by 2000, 30 percent of Maplewood housing stock will be more than 40 years old and 6 percent will be more than 60 years old. This trend, coupled with lower revenues from higher vacancy rates, may make rental property more difficult to maintain. However, reduced demand may give consumers more leverage, requiring landlords to provide a more competitive product. • The need for elderly housing is increasing and may increase sharply as the baby boomers begin to reach their 60s, starting after 2006 and peaking after 2025. Between 1990 and 2000, the regional population will have grown by five percent and the baby boomers will be between ages 35 and 64. Additionally, the percentage of young adults in the region will decrease by 2000. Maplewood and the developing suburbs will continue to grow, although slower than the previous decade. This is because the number of annual housing starts will be about half what it was in the 1980s. By 2010, the baby boomers will be between the ages of 45 and 64 and their children will be entering the housing market. Growth in Maplewood and the developing suburbs may continue to slow and some may experience problems similar to those now faced by the central cities. It may become more difficult to sell a home, and buyers may have many more affordable choices. Baby boomers may force the housing market to produce more and better housing for this group. .t Further details on the future of the Twin Cities i housin g market are available n " Looking Ahead at Housing...The Effect of Changing • . g g Demographics on the Twin Cities Area Housing Market," Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, 1988. HOUSING ISSUES The following are City housing issues: • What steps should the City and its Housing nd Redevelopment g p Authority take to increase the amount of affordable housing? g • Is the City planning enough land for alternative housin g types? es? If not, what changes should the City make? • What steps can the City take to p revent the deterioration or abandonment of its older housing stock? • What steps can the City take to prevent neighborhoods from deteriorating? • What strategies can the City develop to assure that developers build pe a variety of housing styles and types in both new developments and infill development projects? • Are there adequate public services and facilities within each neighborhood to meet the needs of existing nd planned populations? g p pop s . • How can the City preserve some of its natural features and beaut y as the community grows? • Will future housing meet the needs of the increasing number of nontraditional households, particularly single - parent families? 61 HOUSING GOAILS AND POLICIES Housing Affordability Housing costs continue to rise throughout the region as a result of a variety of reasons. These include increasing land and construction costs, utilities and taxes; declines in government aid programs; and, indirectly, land use regulations. These cost increases have the g reatest effect on low- and moderate- income households. Changes in mortgage interest rates also affect the affordability of housing. The Metropolitan Council has a regional goal that 63 percent of the housing in each community should be low -to- modest cost units. Metropolitan Council figures show that Maplewood came very close to meeting this goal in 1980, with 59 percent of its housing classified as low- to- modest cost. The 1990 Census shows. that Maplewood exactly met the goal of having 63 percent of its housing (7684 units) of low -to- modest cost. The City will continue to try to meet this goal with the following policies: Financing • The City, through its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will explore all avenues for financing affordable housing, including: - Use of tax- exempt and tax - increment financing. - Programs, including grants, loans and federal tax credits, available through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. - Programs available through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. - Programs available through the Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority. - Community Development Block Grants and other programs through Ramsey County, Rental Assistance • The City, through the HRA, will continue to participate in rental assistance programs, including those available through the Metropolitan HRA and the federal government. 62 Energy Efficiency • The City will promote energy efficient improvements in all types of housing units to help keep them affordable. The City will provide information and, when available, financial help for both owner- occupied and rental units. HOUSING DIVERSITY Most of Maplewood's housing is single- family homes. The Metropolitan Council has a goal calling for each community. to provide 41 of Y Pe its housing stock in housing types other than single- family homes. From 19.80 to 1988, housing in Maplewood, other than single-family homes, g Y increased from 31.5 percent of the housing stock to 37.0 percent. The City will continue to work toward this goal with the following general policy: Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the City. These are to meet the life - cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. The City also adopts the following specific. housing diversity policies: Land Use Plan • The City will continue to diversity of housing styles, land use plan. provide dispersed locations for a types and price ranges through. its Ordinance Provisions • The City will regularly review and, as necessary, change its zoning and subdivision regulations to assure that they are flexible enough to allow a variety of housing options. Housing for the Elderly and Disabled • The City will make efforts to plan and provide for the housing and service needs of the elderly and disabled. Nontraditional Households • The City will encourage development of housing and services which meet the needs of nontraditional households. 63 NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY It is important to assure that the efforts to provide life -cycle housing needs of the City are accomplished in a manner which is compatible with the character of existing neighborhoods and respect the environment. It is also important to prevent housing in older neighborhoods from deteriorating. Much of this housing as built before Maplewood became g p a village, when building codes were not in p lace. There are also deteriorating housing units scattered throughout the City. In the future, these units may become less attractive to home buyers, thereby depreciating housing values. Figure 23 (page 66) identifies the areas in Maplewood of most concern. To address these concerns, the City adopts the following p o licies: 1. Plan and design new housing to: • Protect existing housing, natural features, and neighborhood identity and quality. • Assure there are adequate utilities, community facilities and convenient shopping. 2. Maintain or strengthen the character of established neighborhoods and assure that all housing units are safe, sanitary, secure and free from blight. The City also adopts the following neighborhood quality policies: Ordinance Provisions • The City will work to protect the integrity and long -term viability of residential neighborhoods and reduce P otential negative effects of commercial or industrial land uses through zoning, site plan review and code enforcement. • The City will require and enforce high design and maintenance standards for multi - family residential development. Design standards will include provisions about building massing, architectural design, off - street parking ratios and location, access, traffic impacts, landscaping, fencing or screening, and trash handling. 64 Locational Aspects • The City will allow affordable housing m any location suitable for residential uses. Environmental Considerations • The City will assure that new development respects the natural environment to the maximum extent practical. • The City will continue to use its Shoreland, Floodplain and Environmental Protection ordinances to assure protection of lakes, streams, ponds, wetlands, steep slopes and woodlots. Housing Maintenance Code • The City will continue to encourage the maintenance of its housing through its housing maintenance codes. The City's truth -in- housing program. should also encourage housing maintenance. Maintenance Assistance • The City, through its Housing and Redevelopment Authority, will participate in programs to help property owners with home maintenance and improvements through loans and, if available, grants. HOUSING ACTION PLAN • Table 12 on page 67 lists activities that the City should undertake to carry out the Housing Plan. 65 I -594 BEAM AVE. CO. RD. C `. j POT Wt& DETERIORATION Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration 111 COMPREHENSIVE P L A N ODEMW 0 OW 1720 3440 5160 FT. 66 _ A, • r E0 I H 00 0 a W ® lI.rAN N ra HE N z x N =MARYLAND AVE. 04v%a L STILLWATER RD. MINNEHAHA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.H* 12/I -94 `. j POT Wt& DETERIORATION Areas of Potential Housing Deterioration 111 COMPREHENSIVE P L A N ODEMW 0 OW 1720 3440 5160 FT. 66 _ A, • r E0 'C H 00 0 a W x 3 a GO N ra w N z x N =MARYLAND AVE. 04v%a L STILLWATER RD. MINNEHAHA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.H* 12/I -94 UPPER AFTON RD._ LOWER AFTON RD. _ LONDIN LN. MAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. HIGHWOOD AVE- CARVER AM � rr � 1 � m � a z a M N W H z cm v Figure 23 TABLE 12 HOUSING ACTION PLAN Action Responsibility _T_g, Funding Coordinate with Explore all options for HRA, Dir of CD Ongoing CDBG, TIF, Land Use Plan, financing affordable EFB, MHFA, Metro HRA housing other local, state, and federal programs Continue to provide rent HRA, Dir of CD, Ongoing Section 8 Metro HRA assistance to needy CC Program, other households state and federal programs Provide information and HRA, Dir of CD Ongoing State and federal Metro HRA assistance to encourage programs energy efficiency improvements Provide dispersed locations for variety of housing types, styles, prices Review and update Codes that affect housing Provide for the housing and service needs of the elderly and disabled Provide housing and services to meet the needs of nontraditional households Protect integrity of, and prevent deterioration in, existing neighborhoods Encourage high design and maintenance standards for multi- family housing PC, CC Ongoing None Land Use Plan PC, CC, HRA Ongoing None Land Use Plan Dir of CD HRA, PC, CC Ongoing State and federal Metro HRA, programs Land Use Plan HRA, CC ongoing State and federal programs PC, Dir of CD, HRA Ongoing None Land Use Plan PC, CC, Dir of CD, Ongoing None Land Use Plan CDRB 67 TABLE 12 HOUSING ACTION PLAN (Continued) Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Assure that new PC, CC, Ongoing None Land Use Plan, development is compatible Dir of CD RW, SC, DNR, CE with, and sensitive to, the environment Continue to review and HRA, Dir of CD Ongoing GF enforce housing maintenance code Participate in rehabilitation, HRA, Dir of CD Ongoing CDBG, State of Metro HRA, and grant programs Minnesota Ramsey County Develop programs to HRA, CC Ongoing GF MWX Mho BRA help first -time home buyers ABBREVIATIONS: HRA = Maplewood Housing and Redevelopment Authority PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council Dir of CD = Director of Community Development CDBG = Community Development Block Grant Funds (federal) TIF = Tax increment financing EBF = Essential bond financing GF = General fund MHFA = Minnesota Housing Finance Agency METRO HRA = Metropolitan Housing and Redevelopment Authority RW = Ramsey Washington Watershed District SC Soil Conservation District DNR = Minnesota Department of Natural Resources CE = Army Corps of Engineers CDRB = Community Design Review Board !OR PARKS PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of the Parks Plan is: • To reconcile park needs with forecasted population increases and development. • To evaluate the park and recreational nos of Maplewood's residents and to develop standards for measuring the meeting of those needs. • To identify needs for inclusion in the Capital Improvements Plan. 0 To identify long -term park goals. GOALS The parks goals are based upon the following analysis of conditions. • Provide adequate parkland within each neighborhood to meet the needs of local residents, to help give neighborhoods a sense of community, to serve as a catalyst for development, to provide facilities and opportunities residents cannot normally provide for themselves and to contribute to the health and well being of Maplewood's citizens. • Provide programs and facilities which meet the recreation needs of all age groups, socioeconomic classes and those with special living needs. M OBJECIIVES The following objectives will provide the framework for development of the Plan recommendations and for future planning and development of the Maplewood Parks and Recreation Program: • Residents should not have to cross major or principal arterials or other physical barriers to gain access to the neighborhood parks designated to serve them. • All residents, where possible, should be served by a neighborhood park. • Maplewood will only provide mini -parks in areas which the City cannot adequately serve a neighborhood park. • Maplewood will continue to promote intergovernmental cooperation with local units of government and private organizations to assure a wide range of recreation opportunities for its citizens. • Maplewood will monitor changes in demographics and lifestyle needs and strive to provide programs and lacilities to meet these needs. CLASSIFICATIONS AND DEFINITIONS The Parks Plan uses the following park facilities classifications and definitions. They are adapted from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council's Recreation Open Space Development Guide /Policy Plan and the National Recreation and Park Association Standards. 70 CLASSIFICATION DEFINITION Mini -park Specialized facilities that serve a concentrated or limited population or specific group such as tots or senior citizens. Neighborhood Park Community Playfield Area combining recreational activities, such as field games, court games, crafts, apparatus area, skating and neighborhood centers, with more passive recreation activities, such as walking, viewing, sitting and picnicking. Area. for intense recreational facilities, such as athletic fields and swimming pools, could include neighborhood use. Special Feature Area that preserves, maintains and provides specialized or single - purpose recreational activities, such as a golf course, nature center, display garden, arena, downhill ski area or sites of historic or archaeological significance. EXISTING FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS Current Inventory The Maplewood Parks and Recreation Department maintains 33 parks. There are seven mini - parks, seventeen neighborhood parks, six community playfield /neighborhood parks, one community playfield and two special feature facilities. These facilities are described in Table 13 and on Figure 24, Existing Parks and Recreational Facilities. Several of these City Parks are leased from Ramsey County. County officials have shown a willingness to transfer ownership of these non- regional facilities. 71 rR vm I I I RIO, BEAN AVE. CO. RD. C Existin Parks and Recreational Facilities 4112111111 M C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N IEDRItw 7L77�J t 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 72 27 ,I LAKE LI XWOOD AVE. - HIGHWOOD AVE. - 1c; S.T.N. 36 0 = 9 -*# 21C 3d cc at U RD. 8 z • V (A • CO. 000 761 -1 00- 09 RA '• • 11': :::::,' ROSELAWN AVE. - '' '�'� ::' .�''' • "':�:': :�:': - ::. . .00 X • is AOU& K LARPENTEUR AVE.--+ n ... ... W% y M1 4 C %0 au CA Q en 33 w Lm us .14C CA "i ft • MARYLAND AVE.- NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 0 OTHER PARKS AND RECREATIONAL • WESTERN HILLS 34�ofr' ljle� &EDGERTON FACILITIES 5. EDGERTON ELEMENTARY - 6' 7. MAPLECREST SCHOOL S.KOHLMAN 9. PHALEN-KELLER -SPOON 12. GLOSTER REGIONAL PARK STILLWATER RD, 14. GLADSTONE 15. WEAVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:.... 16. ROBINHOOD 17• GLADSTONE COMMUNITY EDU- 18. HARVEST. CATION CENTER 19. NORTH HAZELWOOD 22. JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL NINNENAHA AVE. 20. FOUR SEASONS 24. HARMONY COMMUNITY EDUCA ti 21. SHERWOOD 23. WAKEFIELD TION CENTER 27. JOY COUNTY PARK 25. MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS LDRIC 28. A H ARENA 26mPLAYCREST 29. GOODRICH GOLF COURSE CONWAY AVE. 30. GOODRICH 31. MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE .SCHOOL 32. HILLSIDE 34. BEAVER LAKE COUNTY PARK r 35. GERANIUM 36.,BEAVER L AKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL T.N. 12/1-94 37. GETHSEMANE 41. BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL 39. LIONS PARK 40. AFTON HEIGHTS 42. CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 45. VISTA HILLS 46. PLEASANTVIEW 47. FISH CREEK WILLARD MUNGER TRAIL UPPER AFTON RD.- NEIGHBORHOOD PARK OTHER CITY PARKS SERVICE AREA 2. ROSELAWN POND 4. HERITAGE CENTER 6. KENWOOD LOWER AFTON RD. 10. TIMBER LONDIN LN. 11. FLICEK 13. LOOKOUT NAILAND 33. NEBRASKA n 38. MAPLEWOOD NATURE CENTER 43. CRESTVIEW 44. MAILAND Existin Parks and Recreational Facilities 4112111111 M C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N IEDRItw 7L77�J t 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 72 27 ,I LAKE LI XWOOD AVE. - HIGHWOOD AVE. - Fi 24 1c; 0 = 9 -*# 21C 3d cc at U L" z • V (A Fi 24 Other Facilities In addition to those facilities maintained by Maplewood, Ramsey County and the two independent school districts serving Maplewood, Roseville (ISD 623) and North St. Paul- Maplewood/Oakdale (ISD 622), also maintain parks and recreation facilities. There are *two regional parks in the City - Battle Creek Regional Park and Phalen- Keller - Spoon Regional Park. They are part of the regional recreation open space system. These facilities, included in Figure 24, are an important component in the provision of recreational facilities for Maplewood residents. Open Space There are many creeks, marshlands and other areas in Maplewood owned by Ramsey County for open space. These lands have not been included in the inventory of Maplewood's recreation facilities, as they do not fit the current classifications of Maplewood Parks. Cultural and Leisure Progra The City offers a variety of cultural and leisure programs, including: art and dance courses, senior citizens programs, classes for disabled citizens, after - school recreation programs, a range of organized sports programs for all ages, crafts, summer playgrounds, skating, tours, special events, playgrounds in the street, mobile puppet wagon and many others. Coordination With Other Agencies and Organizations Maplewood works with the local schools to provide additional programming. The City has also developed partnerships with neighboring communities to jointly offer programs which entail specialized facilities not available, in each community. The City maintains a close working relationship with Ramsey County and cooperates with a diverse range of organizations, including Babe Ruth Baseball, commercial organizations, and service groups to assure a wide variety of programs and activities. 75 PARK FACI]LrnES STANDARDS The City is using the following standards to assess the degree to which P MaP lewood's ark facilities meet the present and future needs of the community. These standards were taken from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council's Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan and the National Recreation and Park Association Standards. TABLE 14 PARKS FACILITIES STANDARDS Acres/ Population Size Service Classification 1000 -PeoiDle Served Range Area (radius) Mini -Park 0.5 500-29500 2,500 sq. ft. N/A to 1 acre Neighborhood Park 2.5 21,000 - 109000 5 - 25 ac. 1/4 - 1/2 mi. Community Playfield 1.5 102000 - 259000 25 - 50 ac. Community Special Features NIA Community Specific to N/A Feature Notes About the Use of Standards National and regional standards for parkland provide general indications ofP arkland deficiencies. Meeting these standards, however, does not necessarily guarantee that existing parks meet a city's needs in all respects: • A city must consider its geography and topography. This is a Particular concern in Maplewood because of its physical layout. • Physical barriers, such as highways and waterbodies which separate neighborhoods, may result in the need for more parkland. • The intended use and function of each type of park may vary and mean that more or less land should be devoted to various types of parks. 76 • The minimum amount of parkland identified in the standards outlined on the previous page includes only enough developable land to provide those recreational facilities normally found in such parks. Thus, these standards do not include parkland which is occupied by water, marsh, woods or steep slopes; even though these areas do add to the character of a park. and to a feeling of open space. APPLICATION OF STANDARDS IN MAPLEWOOD Mini -Parks Maplewood maintains seven mini -parks totaling 11.7 acres. Neighborhood Parks Maplewood has seventeen neighborhood parks totaling 160 acres. However, five of these facilities are below the recommended five -acre minimum size. ;There are also six parks which serve a dual purpose as both aneighborhood park and a community playfield. One of the neighborhood parks remains undeveloped. Many of the existing neighborhood parks are underdeveloped. The current capital improvements plan addresses the needs in some of these parks. Service Area Standard Those parks which serve as community playfields and neighborhood parks were included in calculating the service -area standards for neighborhood parks. Thus, a total of 23 parks were classified as neighborhood parks for this analysis. Application of the service -area standard of a half -mile service radius revealed neighborhood parkland deficiencies in portions of several neighborhoods, including portions of the Kohlman Lake, Sherwood Glen, Hillside and Highwood neighborhoods. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 15 and in Figure 25. Although the number and location of neighborhood parks are adequate -in the Parkside, Hazelwood, Gladstone, Beaver Lake, Vista Hills and Carver Ridge, as well as portions of the Sherwood, Hillside and Highwood neighborhoods, many of those parks are undeveloped, underdeveloped and/or undersized. 77 Population -Based Standard In applying the population -based standard, only the seventeen neighborhood parks were included. The six mixed-use facilities were not included in applying these standards. The results of this analysis are illustrated in Table 16. CommunjV PIpAel-dw Flicek Park is the City's only community playfield. Six other parks serve a dual role, functioning as community playfields and nei hborhood arks. Y g P These seven parks have a combined total of 120.5 acres. Service Area Standard Because of the unique shape of Maplewood, the City has developed community playfields to minimize traveling distances for teams in an organized sport. The growth of organized sports programs requires all available facilities to be scheduled as needed. As such, the City does not consider it appropriate to apply a service -area standard for community playfields. Population -Based Standard Although all but one of the community playfields serves a dual purpose, the entire acreage for each of the seven facilities was used in applying the population -based standard. The results of this analysis are illustrated in Table 16. Special Features Service -area and population -based park standards are not applicable to the City's two special feature facilities. The Heritage Center facility is on a 3.5 -acre site next to Edgerton park. The building is available on a limited basis for a varietyof programs and special events. The Maplewood Nature Center, a 40 -acre wooded tract and wetland, is an interpretive center staffed with naturalists. The Center contains many trails and provides opportunities for nature study. TABLE 15 APPLICATION OF SERVICE -AREA PARD STANDARDS TABLE 16 APPLICATION OF POPULATION -BASED PARK STANDARDS Current Recommended Recommended FWw=wnded Standard Number Service Number Size Total Current Current of Radius of Range Park Park I)Te _^ Acreage Parks _ (Miles) Parks (Acres) Acreage Mini -Park 11.7 7 N/A N/A 0.06-1.0 N/A Neighborhood Park (including multi -use 172.0 2.5 31,000 77.5 409982 104.5 facilities) 277.5 23 0.5 27 5-25 135 - 675 Community Playfield 3.0 1 N/A NIA 25-50 N/A Special Feature 43.5 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A 335.7 33 TABLE 16 APPLICATION OF POPULATION -BASED PARK STANDARDS (1)' Includes 6 mixed-use facilities. 79 Recommended Recommended Standard Estimated Total Forecasted Total Current (Acres/ 1990 Park Ultimate Park Park Acreage 1000 Popes) .- Population Acreage Population Acreage Mini -Park 11.7 0.5 319000 15.5 40,982 20.9 Neighborhood Park 172.0 2.5 31,000 77.5 409982 104.5 Community Playfield (1) 120.5 2.5 311,000 77.5 409982 104.5 Special Feature 43.5 N/A 31,000 N/A 40,982 N/A (1)' Includes 6 mixed-use facilities. 79 Parks and Recreational Facilities Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 80 27O e nl LAKE 0 4T • _ = 49 oma► .t ac � W Figure 25 I-694 L. ••,•'•••••.•• • .'� ���• ,r.., �. � MAPLE. MA0L 26 .•- •.`--•�.� BEAM AVE �%''�' K0NLUAN LAKE 19• p24 CO. RD. C 8 018 20 S.T.N. 36 KELLER LAK �2. . CO. RD. B (t 7 1014 1p5 02 4 09 ��® ROSELAWN AVE. 2 3 p5 ' 6 11 .f 29 p '� 1 6 •12 p •30 • 32 ROUND 13 LAKE ` 0 LARPENTEUR AVE. - 'LAKE PHALF.N" fl 31 '�• • to � N OC' us :��dr�:'' Nd at t ... Wo • = N ►- W - 00-s W = Z • NEIGHBORHOOD RARKS O OTHER PARKS AND MARYLAND AVE. '3' 4 1: WESTERN HILLS RECREATIONAL FACILITIES 3. EDGERTONLAKF 5. EDGERTON ELEMENTARY / �A�ER 36�, 7. MAPLECREST SCHOOL S. KOHLMAN 9. PHALEN-KELLER-SPOON 12. GLOSTER REGIONAL PARK ST I LLWATER RD. 37 14. GLADSTONE 15. WEAVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 16. ROBINHOOD 17. GLADSTONE COMMUNITY EDU- 38, 18. HARVEST CATION CENTER 19. NORTH HAZELWOOD 22. JOHN GLENN MIDDLE SCHOOL MINNENANA AVE. - 20. FOUR SEASONS 24. HARMONY COMMUNITY EDUCA- 21. SHERWOOD TION CENTER 23. WAKEFIELD 27. JOY COUNTY PARK 25. MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 28. ALDRICH ARENA f 26. PLAYCREST 29. GOODRICH GOLF COURSE CONWAY AVE. 30. GOODRICH 31. MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 32. HILLSIDE 34. BEAVER LAKE COUNTY PARK 35. GERANIUM 36. BEAVER LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3T. GETHSEMANE 41. BATTLE CREEK REGIONAL T.H. 12/I.94 39. LIONS PARK 40. AFTON HEIGHTS 42. CARVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 45. VISTA HILLS y 46. PLEASANTVIEW 40• 47. FISH CREEK �� WILLARD MUNGER TRAIL UPPER AFTON RD. ''' ='�''• NEIGHBORHOOD PARK 41O OTHER CITY PARKS �''''''''''�'f STUDY AREAS 2. ROSELAWN POND 4. HERITAGE CENTER 6. KENWOOD LOWER AFTON RD.- 10. TIMBERLONOIN LN. 43 11. FLICEK 13. LOOKOUT 33.• NEBRASKA MAILAND RD. 45 38. MAPLEWOOD NATURE CENTER 44 • 43. CRESTVIEW 44. MAILAND L I NNOOD AVE. • �:":••: H I GHWOOD AVE. ' .. '""' Parks and Recreational Facilities Plan COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 80 27O e nl LAKE 0 4T • _ = 49 oma► .t ac � W Figure 25 PARKS, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Facilities Acquisition Neighborhood Parks Although population -based park standards show that, overall, Maplewood had adequate acreage devoted- to neighborhood parks and community playfields, service -area standards show deficiencies within several neighborhoods. Special Features Discussion occasionally surfaces that some of the Ramsey County Correctional Facility (workhouse farm) property may one day be available for other uses. A special feature facility, such as a golf course, could be developed on this site should it ever become available. Other Facilities The 1989 community survey documented community desires to develop a central community center offering a range of facilities. The City included a community center in its capital improvement program. The Parks and Recreation Department has also identified the need, over the next decade, to develop smaller indoor neighborhood centers which could offer programs in dance, music, theater and a variety of other programs. Open Space Although not a part of the Parks Plan, the Parks Commission will continue to be involved in efforts to protect Maplewood's open space. Open space is defined as undeveloped lands or natural landscape features with scenic aesthetic or conservation value. This includes woodlands, grasslands and wetlands, intended to be preserved in their natural undeveloped state. The City has initiated an inventory of all available undeveloped lands with the intent to identify key open spaces for possible acquisition and preservation. This is to assure the City retains its unique character while continuing to grow and develop. Areas for A gquisition 9 The City will consider developing a neighborhood park in: - The Kohlman Lake neighborhood to service the residents north of Beam Avenue. The Hillside neighborhood to serve the area south. of Larpenteur Avenue. a - The Highwood neighborhood to serve the area between Linwood and Highwood Avenues. These areas are shown on Figure 25. • where neighborhood parks cannot be developed in these neighborhoods, the City will study the use of mini -parks, multi -use facilities, or open space. • The City will consider the expansion of the following parks: Sherwood Park Geranium Par Gloster Park Goodrich Park Hazelwood Park Hillside Park Maplewood Nature Center • The City will monitor the need for acquisition of land for community playfield development or special feature facilities over the coming years. The City will target the property at the Ramsey County Correctional Facility for development or a special feature park facility if the County stops using the farm land. Community support for the acquisition of additional parklands, even if it involves a small increase in taxes, was documented in a City-wide telephone survey conducted in the fall of 1989 by Decision Resources Ltd. of Minneapolis. The Parks Plan map, Figure 25, identifies areas targeted for acquisition and development of additional neighborhood parks. Progra g Policies Maplewood will continue to use the Capital Improvements Plan to plan for the financing of its park facilities. • The. Park and Recreation Commission will continue to analyze trends and changes in population characteristics and community and neighborhood demand for recreation services. The Commission will develop programs and policies to meet those demands. PARKS ACTION PLAN Table 17 on the following pages lists activities that Maplewood should undertake in the coming years to implement the Parks Plan. This table also shows responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for each activity. The City will periodically review and update this table. TABLE 17 PARKS ACTION PLAN Action Resggnsibility Timm*g Funding..- Coordinate with Develop additional PKC, PC, CC Ongoing PAF, GF Land Use Plan neighborhood parks and/or Dir of Parks mini parks in the following neighborhoods: Kohlman Lake, Hillside, and Highwood Explore enlargement PKC, PC, CC 1990-1992 PAF, GF Land Use Plan of Geranium, Gloster, Dir of Parks Sherwood, Goodrich, Hazel- wood, and Hillside Parks and Maplewood Nature Center Monitor need for PKC, PC Ongoing PAF, GF Land Use Plan community playfields or Dir of Parks special feature facilities Target County Workhouse PKC, PC, CC Ongoing None Ramsey County Farm for park acquisition Dir of Parks if ever phased out Utilize CIP process PKC, PC, CC Ongoing PAF, GF, TIF Land Use Plan to plan for the financing Dir of Parks of park development Develop Centralized PKC, PC, CC Ongoing TIF Land Use Plan Community Center Dir of Parks Develop neighborhood PKC, PC, CC 1995 -Ongoing PAF, GF Land Use Plan community centers as Dir of Parks demand and resources warrant Monitor trends and PKC Ongoing None Land Use Plan changes in population Dir of Parks characteristics and demand for services Work with Ramsey County PKC, CC Ongoing None Ramsey County officials to transfer Dir of Parks ownership of nonregional parks to the city m TABLE 17 PARKS ACTION PLAN (Continued) Action Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with If schools are closed PKC, CC Ongoing GF Independent School in the future, acquire Districts outdoor recreation facilities for continued use by citizens Assist with the protection PKC, PC, CC Ongoing GF of wetlands, floodplains Dir of Parks and other critical areas ABBREVIATIONS: PKC = Park and Recreation Commission PC = Planning Commission CC = City Council Dir of Parks = Director of Parks and Recreation PAF = Park Acquisition Funds GF = General Fund TIF Tax -Increment Financing Land Use Plan TRANSPORTATION PLAN PURPOSE The purpose of the Transportation Plan is to plan for adequate road, transit,estrian and bicycle facilities. The City is planning these facilities to complement and support the other Comprehensive Plan elements. TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Although Maplewood is a developing suburb, its transportation system is g P well established. The City will, however, need to focus on the following transportation issues: • The implications of LRT service in Maplewood: How the City can ID maximize the potential for economic development while also minimizing impacts acts on residential areas; how LRT service should be extended to the Maplewood Mall; and how at* grade crossings can be minimized. • The City should coordinate with other agencies to relieve traffic congestion in the Maplewood Mall area. • The Cit should formulate policies for the location and development City of sidewalks and trails. MAJOR STREET SYSTEM Figure 26 shows the planned system of major roads along with the proposed light rail transit routes which have been identified by the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority.. The mayor proposed improvements are in the Mall area: W 1. The extension of Kennard Street to County Road D. 2. An east -west collector street between Southlawn Boulevard and Highway 61, north of Beam Avenue. This street would extend across Highway 61, curving north to County Road D. Street Classification System Maplewood adopted- its street classification system from the Twin Cities p P Metropolitan Councils ' " Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan. " Figure 27 shows typical street sections *for each type of road. The road types are described as follows: Principal Arterials - roadways designed to carry the highest volume of traffic(15,000 + ADT), allow the highest speeds (40-55 mph), satisfy the longest trip desires and provide subregional, regional, and inter -community access. These roadways do not provide direct access to abutting properties. Principal arterials are spaced based on Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) and Ramsey County standards. This roadway type connects with minor arterial and collector streets. • Minor Arterials - roadways that connect two or more subregions, supplement the restricted access arterial system and provide direct access to abutting properties as determined In the Code of Ordinances for the . City of Maplewood, Minnesota Chapter 29 Article Iv p . DrvewaY sSpacing of minor arterials is determined by Mn/DOT and Ramsey County standards, with site specific exceP tions. This roadway type serves inter- and intra -community needs for trips, carries high traffic volumes (7,000 + ADT), allows moderate -to -high travel speeds (35-50 mph), connects major trip generators, funnels traffic between collectors and restricted access arterials and contains two drive lanes in each direction. • Collector Streets - roadways designed to carry traffic between the art y arterial system and the local system, convey intra -community traffic between major subdivisions, business centers, industries, parks and the like, and provide direct access to abutting properties. r� 8.T•li. 36 KFLLF. �1 LAK= ''�• CO. RD. H - f■ff�fi/f f� "/ ROSELAWX AVE. f /// / / f f /1 171 Bit L400 �! -�a0UN0 - J lAKP LARPENTEUR AVE. LAKE 1. o 0 OE V (a v o • P3 W E+ PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL —�- MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR la-. POTENTIAL LRT ALIGNMENT AND STATION LOCATION Major Street System and LRT Plan C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N �lllrw 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 87 +iii• ! '� _� I-�!4 / f as X. / �f LINWOOD AVE. MAPLE-11WOOD MALI REALM AVE. . KONLMAN LAKE ; �. ; ;r'r . Ea g�v2 LAKE CO. RD. c -- i / Bill �'• `/ d I I / as 1 9-11. 8.T•li. 36 KFLLF. �1 LAK= ''�• CO. RD. H - f■ff�fi/f f� "/ ROSELAWX AVE. f /// / / f f /1 171 Bit L400 �! -�a0UN0 - J lAKP LARPENTEUR AVE. LAKE 1. o 0 OE V (a v o • P3 W E+ PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL —�- MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR la-. POTENTIAL LRT ALIGNMENT AND STATION LOCATION Major Street System and LRT Plan C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N �lllrw 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 87 +iii• ! '� -14 UPPER AFTON RD._■ffi//i LOWER AFTON RD. _� LONDIN LN. / f as / �f LINWOOD AVE. a HIGHWOOD AVB. � lie- I N R � F -g I& ■ f I&S, off m x 0 o. oc oa � 00 a =C a 1 c� w N x x 39 MARYLAND AVE. / f / 1 ■ 1 N .i•i � 3 BFAVF.a IAKF 0000 a 64 � Z W STZLLWATER RD. w E+ V �0 Figure 26 f/f MINNEHl1H!► AVE. CONWAY AVE. T. it. 12/1 -14 UPPER AFTON RD._■ffi//i LOWER AFTON RD. _� LONDIN LN. / f XAILAND RD. / �f LINWOOD AVE. a HIGHWOOD AVB. lie- awl - CARVER AVS. -g I& ■ f I&S, � s i 1 N .i•i � 3 M a 64 � Z W U w E+ V �0 Figure 26 VARIABLE - 80' MIN. VARIABLE 52' MIN. + i Slas- Blvd Blvd Side - Walk Wolk a . !- a 4b 1 Street Section 01 d Minor Arterial Street o I 44' 1 1 1 i 1 i a ; I Yellow Skip Une I I 1 1 Side- Blvd. Blvd. j 1 Whlk 1 5' 8' 22' 22' 8' 1 I 1 I 1 d Street Section o Collector Street 0 v Unrestricted Parking W L lo' sof 10' 36 i I l I 1 • Yellow Skip line Sold WNIh 1 l 1 lb I Side* 8Wd pwkhq Lane Bhd. i Wdk 1 S' 9' 14' 12' 10' 9' i I 1 I • i 1 I 1 Street Section d Collector Street W Parking One Side W so' 3 Street Section a Typical Residential Street o � ac 88 Figure 27 This typeof roadway carries moderate traffic volumes (1,000 - 7,000 ADT), allows moderate -to -high speeds (30-45 mph) with curves designed for 30 mph travel, satisfies local trip needs and connects local streets with arterials. Spacing of collector streets is generally 1/2 mile. • Local Streets -roadways primarily designed to provide for intra - neighborhood travel needs, direct access to abutting properties and convey traffic to and from higher level roadways. This type of roadway carries the lowest traffic volumes (generally less than 1,000 ADT), allows low speeds (maximum 30 mph) and the horizontal curves need not accommodate 30 mph travel. Spacing of local streets is one block or as needed. STREET SYSTEM POLICIES • The City will continue to design and maintain its roads and review site plans according to the functional classification system of roads illustrated by Figure 26, and the design standards illustrated in Figure 27. These standards will ensure that streets serve the City's needs and enhance regional- efforts to reduce traffic congestion. • The City will do what it can to help implement improvements to the metropolitan highway system planned through 2010, although locations for those improvements would most likely occur on state or county rights-of-way. • The City will do what it can to manage the impacts on local streets caused by the queuing of vehicles at meters and bypass ramps. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT POLICIES Travel demand management (TDM) is designed to increase the number of people who share rides and who travel outside of rush hours. These techniques are expected of communities in the metropolitan area served by congested portions of the metropolitan highway system and of cities that . g have regional business concentrations. It has proven to be far more cost- effective toP romote TDM and transit than to try to build more highway lanes. The 3M Company, Maplewood's major employer with over 12,000 employees,is also one of the region's leaders in developing ridesharing programs. The company maintains 105 employee -operated vans providing service to 850 employees. 3M has been supporting ridesharing for over 16 years and its Rideshare Services Department also coordinates commuter van services for other 3M facilities across the United States. • Maplewood has a mixture of housing and commercial which may help to reduce travel on the metropolitan highway system by allowing people to dive near their place of work. The Land Use Plan continues that pattern. • The City urges the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Council to conduct educational programs to encourage ride sharing, staggered work hours and off-peak travel. Such campaigns can be most effectively mounted at the metropolitan level. TRANSrr POLICIES Effective use of transit can make a significant difference in the level of congestion in certain corridors. Currently, the City is served by 19 Metropolitan Transit Service (MTC) regular bus routes and two express routes operated by North Suburban Lines. Maplewood has two park-and-ride lots with a total capacity of 55 parking spaces. One -hundred thirty-four residents and five area businesses participate in the Minnesota Rideshare ` Program. Dial -A -Ride. The Morley Bus Company operates a general purpose dial -a -ride service called the Northeast St. Paul Transit service (NEST). Metro Mobility and the Independent School District 622 Seniors Program provide special transportation services for the elderly and disabled. Light Rail Transit The Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA) has developed a twenty-year LRT Plan. This plan calls for two light rail corridors providing service through Maplewood: the Northeast Corridor, providing service along I -35E or the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, and the East Corridor, which would use either Minnehaha Avenue or I-94. Preliminary analysis is underway on the design for the Northeast Corridor. Five station locations have been identified to provide service in Maplewood. Figure 26 shows the routes and potential station locations. Ramsey County officials have not yet determined whether or how Maplewood Mall would be linked with a light rail line. The RCRRA will analyze this issue during design development of the Northeast Corridor, The R_ amsey Com Comprehensive LRT Plan also identifies an east -west crosstown LRT alignment which would parallel TH 36 as it passes through Maplewood. This latter line is part of the Phase II Plan which the RCRRA is not scheduling for implementation until after 2010. Light Rail Transit Policies • The City will continue to actively participate in the planning for light rail transit systems in the City. • Maplewood will work closely with RCRRA officials in the siting and design of potential LRT station locations, including park-and- ride facilities. These stations should maximize access for residents and complement the City's land use plan. • The RCRRA should provide an LRT line to the Maplewood Mall with a station. • The RCRRA should place a high priority. on providing as many grade -separated roadway crossings as possible along LRT lines. • The RCRRA should bridge over the planned east -west road, between Beam Avenue and County Road D. Transit Service Policies • The City supports MTC's construction of new or improved bus stops and shelters. • The City supports efforts by the MTC to focus service on the Maplewood Mall transit hub, improve off-peak service and improve express service to St. Paul. • The City will review major new developments for inclusion of bus shelters and pull-outs, if such sites are along MTC bus routes. • The City will coordinate its sidewalk plan to encourage bus usage. 91 BICYCLIST AND PEDESTRIAN POLICIES The City recognizes that walking and bicycling are alternative forms of transportation for significant numbers of people. In a community survey conducted in the fall of 1989 by Decision Resources,. 75 percent of the respondents supported construction of a city-wide trail system. This finding is consistent with survey results which also showed that walking, hiking, jogging and bicycling are among the most popular outdoor activities in Maplewood. • The City will develop a coordinated sidewalk and trails system. • There should be sidewalks along all minor arterial and collector streets, as shown in Figure 26. On minor arterial streets, there should be an off-street sidewalk or a bituminous trail on each side. Each collector street should have an on -street trail. • where there are no streets, there should be off-street trails provided to sites which are generators of pedestrian and bicycle traffic. • The City will plan the funding of City -constructed sidewalks through the capital improvements program. Ramsey County should maintain paved shoulders along county roads. • The City will design sidewalks and trails which: - Are coordinated with school district busing policies. - Are within one mile of parks, community facilities, shopping and schools. - Encourage transit usage. - Provide linkages to existing trails in parks. - Support County and regional trails systems. • The City does not remove snow from sidewalks. Figure 28 shows the Bikeways/Trails Plan. TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN Table 18 on page 95 lists activities that Maplewood should undertake in the coming years to implement the Transportation Plan. This table also shows the responsibility, timing, funding and coordination for each activity. The City will periodically review and update this table. 92 In addition to City projects, there are several large State projects planned through Maplewood: 1. Additional lanes on I-94 from Century Avenue to McKnight Road and revised access to 3M. An additional ' lane on I-94 may be a high -occupancy -vehicle (HOV) lane. It may extend from downtown � y Saint Paul all the way east to Hudson, Wisconsin. Since much of the land to the south is a regional park and 3M has developed the land to the north, these changes should not effect the land use plan. The City will work with the State and 3M in the planning of these changes to coordinate any necessary City transportation changes. 2. The addition of an. HOV lane, metered ramps and HOV bypasses of those ramps on Highway 36. This work will eliminate signalized intersections and close several accesses to Highway 36. The City is also planning a new interchange at the BN Corridor. 3. A new interchange at Courtly Road and I-494 in Woodbury would connect to Century Avenue. This change would affect traffic levels and the intersection with Century Avenue. Maplewood, however, will continue to plan for low-density residential development in this area. 93 BEAD! AVE. --- i CO. Ra. C R.1'.Y. 34 CO. RD. H - ROSELAWN AVE. r LARPENTZUR AVE. O O O Tf- 0 h O x O E+ i13 EXISTING BIKEWAYS ON STREET ****see OFF STREET PLANNED BIKEWAYS -- ON STREET OFF STREET BIKEWAYS/TRAILS PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN c+11111311 t 0 860 1720 3440 5160 FT. NORTH 94 y h oc oc h � W • M Ci o = f, . tz x MMARYLAND AVE. SF.AVF.a IAKF STILLWATER RD. MINNEHAHA AVE. CONWAY AVE. T.B. 12/I-94 UPPER AFTON RD. LOWER AFTON RD. i LONDIN LN. MAILAND RD. LINWOOD AVE. HIGUWOOD AVE. CARVER AVs. AM i f° u Figure 28 TABLE 18 TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN Actions Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Maintain local streets Engineer Ongoing GF Utility Projects Dir of CD Minimize excessive non- Engineer Ongoing GF Land Use Plan local traffic on Dir of CD residential streets Encourage link between PC, CC, 1992-2000 GF Land Use Plan Beam Avenue and County Engineer Mn/DOT RamCo Road D Dir of CD RamCo Facilitate freeway Engineer 1992-2000 Mn/DOT Mn/DOT ramp metering and queuing Review major site PC, Ongoing GF plans to promote Dir of CD transit usage Continue mixture of PC, Ongoing GF Land Use Plan land uses Dir of CD Promote use of PC, CC Ongoing None MTC transit Dir of CD Participate in LRT PC, CC, Ongoing None RCRRA planning Dir of CD Promote new public Dir of CD, Ongoing GF MTC and private bus Engineer shelters Promote improved bus PC, HRA, CC Ongoing GF MTC and transit service Relieve mall area Engineer, CC Ongoing GF Mn/DCCT traffic congestion Mn/DOT RamCo RamCo 95 TABLE 18 TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN (Continued) Actions Responsibility Timing Funding Coordinate with Provide sidewalks Engineer ongoing GF along arterials and collector streets Coordinate sidewalks PC, PKC, Ongoing GF and trails with schools, Engineer, parks, shopping, transit, Dir of CD and regional plans ABBREVIATIONS: PC = Planning Commission CC City Council PKC = Park and Recreation Commission Dir of CD = Director of Community Development Engineer = City Engineer/Public Works Director GF = General Fund Mn/DOT = Minnesota Department of Transportation RCRRA = Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority MTC = Metropolitan Transit Commission RamCo = Ramsey County HRA = Housing and Redevelopment Authority CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND SANITARY SEWER PLANS The City's Capital Improvement and Sanitary Sewer. Plans are separate documents that the City has adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. MA Maplewood Planning Commission -9- Minutes of 3-2-92 (2 The City Council shall review this p it one year from e date of approval, based on th rocedures in the Cit code. (3) The sch of shall turn the t nis court lights off by 10:00 p.m Only the scho shall use the tennis court lights. (4) The school shal no use the area between the tennis courts and pond a the west lot line as a track or route for runni a shall be limited to fall meets. (5) The City Co cil may re ire that the Academy build a driveway Beebe Road th ough the School District's property if the Academy bu the School District's buildi (6) /ThCouncil may .require that the school chain the rly access for evening event if they become a em. C missioner Anitzberger seconded Ayes --An zberger, Axdahl, Fi cher, Frost, Gerke, Pear n, Rossbach, Sigmundik, Si n The motion passed. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS b. Comprehensive Plan The Commission reviewed the Plan with some changes and requested staff make the corrections. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan update with the changes requested at tonight's meeting. Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes--Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Ger ke, Pearson, Rossbach, S igmundik, Sinn The motion passed.. 7. V PRESEN NS The re no vi presentations. T---� Action by Council: Endorsed MEMORANDUM Mod.if i e ReJ ecter TO: City Manager Date FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review Process ordinance DATE. March 10, 1992 INTRODUCTION I am recommending several changes to the section of City Code about the procedures for reviewing conditional use permits (CUP). Our current procedures caused some confusion. at a.recent pre -agenda meeting. DISCUSSION The proposed ordinance does the following: 1. It allows the Council to review a conditional use permit at any time in addition to periodic reviews. 2. It allows the Council to change or drop conditions in addition to adding conditions. 3. It adopts the same procedure for changing a permit as the City uses in approving a new permit. (The current wording only requires that the City send notices to surrounding property owners. The procedure for a new permit also requires publication in the paper.) 4. It requires that the City not change permit conditions unless the permit is no longer meeting one of the standards for approving a CUP. (These standards are on page 3.) The City Attorney recommended this to avoid arbitrary changes that may result in a i AN ORDINANCE CLARIFYING THE REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: (I have crossed out the deletions and underlined the additions.) Section 1. Section 36-446 (b) is changed as follows: (b) The city council may review a permit at any time. If the council ' decides to consider addin dropping or changing conditions, the council shall follow the procedures in section, 36-441 for approving a newpermit* ,_, • The council shall not change conditions unless the conditional.use no 1 oncaer meets one of the standards in section 3,6-442L. for approving a new permit. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage. go\memo52.mem (5.1) 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS 1 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. - z The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any.activity, process, materials equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisanceso would generate only minimal vehicular traffic use 5. The g on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. .The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire p rotection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services . 8.. The use would maximize the preservationof and P incor orate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. 3 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Roselawn Reconstruction, Project 87-01 DATE: March 18, 1992 AGENDA ITEM J70wo 7 Pru- - ' lotion b* Council: �M• Ww ► Rejected... Bids have been received for the reconstruction of Roselawn Avenue from Rice Street to Jackson Street. The bids are lower than the engineer's estimate. Ramsey County has requested Maplewood to concur in the award of the contract to Frattalone Excavating and Grading, Inc. This would normally be a simple item, In this case, however, the decision is complicated by agreements required with the St. Paul Water Utility and the City of Little Canada. St. Paul Agreement The agreement with St. Paul Water Utility addresses a number of issues. The first issue is easements required for Maplewood utilities and a retaining wall required for the road. The agreement sets up a process for Maplewood and St. Paul to negotiate a value for the easements based on appraisals. The second issue is the standards to be used for construction. Use of Maplewood standards saves about $30,000 in construction cost without compromising quality. We are insisting that Maplewood standards be used. The issue of assessment is resolved by the agreement. St. Paul agrees to pay the estimated assessment amount of $29,040. The last issue involves the plantings along Roselawn by the spent lime storage area. The proposal is to plant trees according to the approved plan. The cost would be funded through Maplewood state aid. Little Canada Agreement The agreement with Little Canada is fairly simple. The City of Little Canada would transfer ownership and responsibility for a piece of 12 -inch water main in Roselawn Avenue to the City of Maplewood. This pipe is not needed any longer by Little Canada, but is required to complete the Maplewood system. Project 87-01 2 March 18, 1992 Recommendation It is recommended the city council take the following actions: 1. Authorize execution of the agreement with St. Paul Water Utility. 2. Authorize execution of the agreement with Little Canada. 3. Concur in the award of contract to Frattalone Excavating and Grading, Inc. KGH jc Attachments BOARD €3F WATER COMMISSIONERSIN �_,�•,� cl no,,, . ,. .79 9:. ,Lt, t ., ,f•�`i'. .,L ,4 x RLit���.C1L` n 1 This Agreement, made and entered into this day of 1992, by and between the BOARD of WATER COMMISSIONERS of the City of Saint Paul., a political corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter ref erred to as L "Board", and the CITY OF MA.PLEWOOD, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Maplewood". c WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, The County of Ramsey, hereinaf ter ref erred to as "County", proposes to reconstruct Roselawn Avenue between. Rice Street and Jackson Street, said Roselawn Avenue being a. County Road dividing Maplewood and the City of Little Canada, hereinafter referred to as "Little Canada"; and WHEREAS, Maplewood has agreed to provide the County with sufficient land Y abutting the right-of-way of Roselawn Avenue to accommodate utilities, slopes and filling required to construct a proposed new roadway; and WHEREAS, The Board possesses title to certain real estate lying in the Northwest One-quarter of Section 18, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, in Ramsey County, said real estate hereinafter called "Premises", and Maplewood and the County desire permission to enter upon certain portions of said Premises and therein construct a public 12 -inch water main and drainage facilities consistent with requirements and safety of the works of the Board; and WHEREAS, County proposes to remove and thereafter replace existing trees that provide visual screening for the. Board's spent lime basins, said tree plantings to be in accordance with plans prepared by the County and approved by Maplewood; and WHEREAS, A proposed change'in the grade of Roselawn Avenue adds up to four feet of additional earth fill over existing 12 -inch and 24 -inch water mains supplying the Little Canada water distribution system, said water mains being o erated and maintained by Little Canada and the Board. P NOW THEREFORE, I n consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set i Ij forth, the Board and Maplewood hereby agree as follows: 1. Land Issues A. Maplewood and County shall determine the land areas where permanent easements and temporary construction easements will be required in Board -owned property. Maplewood shall hire a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the value of said easements. Where a permanent easement is requested for the County's proposed retaining walls the real estate appraiser shall also determine the value of said land based upon fee title purchase by Maplewood.. Maplewood shall furnish a copy of the real estate appraiser's report to the Board for review by Saint Paul's Real. Estate Manager. Final terms of the land or easement purchase shall be negotiated by representatives of Maplewood and the Board. B. Board hereby grants permission to Maplewood and the County to construct aP ublic 12 -inch water main to be owned by Maplewood in Board -owned land designated as "Premises". Water main construction plans and s ecifications prepared by the County and approved by the Board shall conform to Saint Paul Water Utility Standards. The Board reserves to itself the right to install additional works within the Boards property ert ' and to continue maintenance of existing works located p y therein. Should i Y necessar t be that Maplewood's works or improvements be removed or damaged as a result of the Board's operations, all replacement or modification costs to restore Maplewood's works or improvements will be borne solely by Maplewood. Maplewood shall forever indemnify and save harmless, protect and defend the. City of Saint Paul and the Board, their employees and agents, from any or all liability, suits or demands, including the legal defense costs thereof , for bodily injuries (including death) or property damages, including loss of use, arising out of the construction,.maintenance, repair or existence of the 12 -inch water main authorized by the Board. This provision shall not however apply where such bodily injury or property damage is caused by the sole negligence of the City of Saint Paul or the Board, its agents or employees. During construction or future maintenance or repair of the 12 -inch water main in the Board -owned Premises Maplewood, or Maplewood's contractor shall take out and maintain comprehensive public liability (including automobile) insurance for and in behalf of Permittee, the City. of Saint Paul and the Board as additional insureds, protecting the parties from claims for damages and bodily injuries, including accidental death, as well as from claims for damage to property, including property owned by the Board, which may arise f rom operations incidental to this 12 -inch water main including coverage for damage to structures of any kind or underground structures of any kind, whether such operations be by Maplewood or by any contractor or subcontractor or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them. Such insurance shall also include contractual liability coverage and shall insure the liability assumed by Maplewood under the indemnification clause contained herein. The minimum amount of such liability insurance shall be as follows: Bodily injury insurance (including death) in an amount not less than $300,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of one person, and subject to the same limit for each person in a total of not less than $600,000 on account of any one occurrence. Property damage insurance in an amount of not less than $300,000 for all damages to or destruction of property in any one occurrence, e, and subject to that limit per occurrence; further subject to a total of.not less than $600,000 for all damages to or destruction of property during the policy period. All insurance shall include the provision that it cannot be altered or cancelled except upon thirty days written notice to the Board, and such insurance shall meet with the approval of the City Attorney of the City of.Saint Paul. Acceptable written proof of insurance shall be delivered to the Board well in advance of the time contemplated for commencing any operation authorized .herein.and no operations. shall be commenced, carried on, continued or permitted .except after the Board has given Maplewood its written approval of said insurance, and said insurance so approved is in force and effect. It is intended that the permission granted herein and the obligations set forth herein shall run with the property owned by Board and shall be binding upon i Maplewood its heirs, successors or assigns and upon the Board, ,its successors or assigns. 2. Existing Facilities A. The 12 -inch and 24 -inch water mains which supply water to Little Canada shall be relaid at proper depth through the roadway and slope areas at no expense to the Board or Little Canada. B. All existing water facilities affected by the Roselawn Avenue project and all new water facilities to be installed under this project shall be constructed arid/or adjusted to conform to Saint Paul Water Utility Standards. 3. Assessments The Board agrees to pay an assessment for the proposed new roadway in Roselawn Avenue to Maplewood an amount not to exceed $27,195.00. Payment shall be made upon receipt of a proper invoice therefor. 4 - f 4. Landscaping eb a landsca ing and planting plans prepared by the Maplewood.her y roves pp P County. Roselawn Avenue between Rice Street and Jackson Street. Maplewood agrees that no additional visual screening will be required of the Board along the north side of Roselawn Avenue.. parties hereto have caused these presents to be IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The p executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD f r I Approved as to Form: By Mayor By Maplewood City Attorney City Manager BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL Approved: By Thomas D. Mogren, General Manager President A roved as to form: By y PP Secretary Assistant City Attorney COUNTER SIGNED: By Richard A. Gehrman, Director, Department of Finance and Management Services 'ENT BY.' 00 :11!U71ANJ DAi'v',ti [ GAN & KELLY G 1 2 "170 4 1- U G : # O 0 AGREEMENT' `I'HIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1992 by 9nrl ht%tiyPPn +r 17T OF M.A1'.1._rWOOD7 it inuilioiPal oorimnition of the Etat:. Of NUtL1A.:.,u1C% (hereinafter referred to as "Ma lewood" and CITY. OF LIT'T'LE CANADA • P ) a munu.clpal corporation of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter referred to as "Little Canada ,, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Little Canada currentlyowns and hold all rights to an existing 12" � � watermain located within the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, Maplewood has agreed to assume .title andossession of a. . ort.ion o£ th p P e aforementioned watermain from Little Canada; and WHEREAS, the transfer of ownership and possession of the aforementioned watermain is in the public intcre-3t of both Maplewood and LittlC C�ula�l�- and YMERFAS, thr, fit. P���l Bnarrl of Water �'c�mmissionerg sh:�l] not be adversely affected in Any way by this tracLsf�r �C �,w�,c� ���1 ui �,�,esa�uli of the aforementioned wat.e . p !� rm�.In. NOW, THEREFQRE, in considerdti011 of the m»tual muortants and a reement� g Evt forth,. Maplewood and Little Canada hereby agree as follows: � 11 Little Canada hereby grants, conveys, , asst ns and transfers to Maplewood Y r g plc ood al .rigl►ts in the existing 1.2" watermain, frc�rn the valved approximately 60 feet north the pP y of h Roselawn right-of-way on the watermain parallel to the SOO Line Railroad serving Little Ca.na.da to the valve at the West right-of-way at Jackson Street. g Y 21 Maplewood hereby assumns 8nd nhli ates itself to mai=dn the aforemen i e S ton d P of the watermain without further duties or obligations g a irn used aihist Little Canada. p 3. Maplewood shall forever indemnify and save harmless,t' roteet and defend Little Canada, its employees and agents, from any or all liability, suits, demands including the legal defense costs thereof for bodily injuries, (including Q�Ajh) or property damt r.ss inchidingIn_ ss of �,se, arising out of the construction, maintenance, repair or existence of the aforemention P ed SENT BY: 3-17-92 :11: U t ANI BANN 1 GAN & KELLY-- 612 770 45u6:# 31 3 portion of the 12" waterm4in, ll j?I4YlSion shall MA linwever dipply whr,rr, .Sikh bodily in'u c�..�.i eri hy..�h�.�sn1.�..ne. hg�,e.r1r�.�.of.. or proPerty damage is Little. Cana.,_ its .a Tert...or- e-m ?o 555..... 4. The future maintenance of the aforementioned portion of the waterniain shall be performed at the sole discretion of Maplewood without further consultation of Little Canada. 5& It is intended that the title and./or possession ranted or conveyed herein and P � y l.lic i)ljl.igUliu11s set forth herein Shall be binding upon Maplewood and Little Can,ida, their heirs, successors or. assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties. hereto have caused theseresents to be executed P the day and year first above written. CITY OF MA.PLEWOOD By Mayor By City Clct- Approved as to farm: Maplewood City Attorney CI1T OF LITTLE CANADA By Mayor By .. . City Clerk Approved as to form: Little Canada City Attorney W December .9 , 1991 Ramsey County DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 3377North Rice Street Saint Paul,- Minnesota 5.5 12 6 (612) 484-9104 Divisions of: Engineering Maintenance Mobile Equipment Environmental Services Mr. Ken Haider City Engineer 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Bid opening - December 4, 1991, 2:00 p.m. Roselawn Avenue T.H. 49 to Jackson Street S.A.P. 62-626-04 & MSAP 138-020-13 Bridge No. 62559 - Roselawn Avenue/Soo Line Railroad .S . P . 62---626-03 Accompanying is a copy of the Abstract of bids received for the roadway work. The low bidder is Frattalone Excavating & Grading, Inc., Frank M. Frattalone, President; 3066 Spruce Street, St., Paul, MN 55117, Ph. 612-484--0448, Fax .612-484-7839. The apparent low bidder on the bridge was Lunda Construction company with a bid of $478,197.20. Mn/DOT will be. awarding the bridge contract. The low bid of Frattalone of $618,000.00 was 13% below the engineer's estimate of $714,980.00. Also accompanying is a cost distribution based on the low bid unit prices and a cost participation summary in conformance with out Agreement 90026. As provided in our agreement we are requesting your concurrence to award this contract to the low bidder f Frattalone Excavating & Grading, Inc. We anticipate a contract can be awarded by February, 1992, and anticipate a spring start of the work. It is. necessary that work under this road contract be coordinated with the bridge construction. .If you wish to -enlarge on the cities responsibility in the utility construction as provided in our agreement we would request you schedule a meeting to review your suggestions. This can be handled separately from the concurrence to award however we would prefer they be submitted to.the County board at the same time. Any changes to the water system proposed as a result of the latest St. ,Paul Water Commissions letter can probably be best handled as a supplement or change to the construction contract. We will wait for your direction on how to proceed.with this matter. Mr. Ken Haider .page. 2 In summary we probably need to get together on a couple of items but in the meantime we would like your concurrence to award this contract to the low b'dder. f Wayne Leon d, P.E. Special Projects WRL:ptd cc: BRA -- Tom Peterson AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Clerk RE: REDISTRICTING DATE: March 18, 1992 Anti on by Council: Endorsed Modifi ea�.,_,e. ReJ ecterl.�......�....�. Date .. The Minnesota State Legislature has mandated that the City Clerks redistrict . . . their municipalities to reflect the new legislative districts. The City of Maplewood will now have 4 legislative districts: 53B, 54B.9 55B and 57B. Because of this redistricting, most precincts within Maplewood had to be re -aligned. Precincts cannot overlap legislative districts nor school district t boundaries, therefore the City of Maplewood will now have 16 precincts. It is anticipated that 2 new Op -Tech III voting machines will be necessary* 8 mor$5.,000y e election judges and approximately i n postage will l be needed to notify y each registered voter of their precinct number and legislative district. At this timethe State has proposed paying 25 per capita to to cover redistricting cti 9 p p ng i costs. It s not clear how we can collect these funds, but we are researching that now. It is recommended the Council adopt the attached Resolution redistricting Maplewood into 16 precincts. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PRECINCTS AND DEFINING BOUNDARIES WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has established new legislative districts; and WHEREAS, this redistricting causes changes in the present City of Maplewood established precincts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota, does hereby establish sixteen (16) precincts and defines their boundaries as follows: Precinct No. 1 PARKSIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT Bounded by Larpenteur Avenue on the South; County Road B on the North; Rice Street on the Westerly and Highway 35E on the East. Precinct No. 2 ST. JEROME'S SCHOOL Larpenteur on the South, Highway 35E on the West; Highway 36 & Roselawn on the North; DeSoto St. and Keller Lake Channel on the East. Precinct No. 3 EDGERTON_ SCHOOL Roselawn Avenue on the South; Highway 36 on the North; DeSoto St. on the West; Maplewood Dr. on the East. Precinct No. 4 GLADSTONE FIRE DEPARTMENT Larpenteur Ave. on the South, Recreation Trail and a portion of Frost Avenue on the North and West; Prosperity Road and Hazelwood on the East. Precinct No. 5 GLADSTONE COMMUNITY CENTER Recreational Trail on South; Highway 36 on the North; Maplewood Drive on the West; Hazelwood on the East. Precinct No. 6 HAZELWOOD FIRE STATION Highway 36 on the South; County Road C on the North; Arcade Street and Keller Parkway on the West; White Bear Avenue on the East. Precinct No. 7 County Road D and Highway 694 on North; Little Canada/Maplewood Boundary Line on the West and White Bear Avenue on the East. Precinct No. 8 CONCORDIA ARMS Highway 36 and North St. Paul/Maplewood Boundary Line on South; Highway 694 on North; White Bear Ave. on West; Century Ave. on East. Precinct No, 9 MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL Recreational Trail on the South; Highway .36 on the � North; Hazelwood Street on the West; Ariel Street alignment on the East. Precinct No. 10 RAMSEY COUNTY NURSING HOME Larpenteur Ave. on South; North St. Paul Rd. on South East; Prosperity and Hazelwood on West; Recreational Trail on North; North St. P aul/Maplewood Boundary on East. Precinct No, 11 MAPLEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL Larpenteur Paul/Maplewood on the South; North St. Paul Ma / p Boundary Line on North; North St. Paul Rd. on West; Century Ave. on East. Precinct No. 12 BEAVER LAKE SCHOOL Minnehaha on South; Larpenteur on • . p the North, McKnight on West; Ferndale St. and Alignment on g East. Precinct No. 13 EAST COUNTY LINE N0, 1 Highway 94 on theSouth; Mi nnehaha and Larpenteur p teur on North; McKnight Rd and Ferndale St. and Ali-gnment-on West; Century Ave. on East. Precinct No. 14 CARVER SCHOOL Lower Afton Rd. on the South; Highway94 on North; McKnight Rd. on West; Century Ave. on East. Precinct No. 15 EAST COUNTY LINE N0, 2 Linwood Avenue on South; Lower Afton Road on North; McKnight Road on West; Century Ave. on East. Precinct No. 16 EAST COUNTY LINE N0, 2 Ramsey Co./Washington Co. Boundary on the • . y South, Linwood on North; McKnight Rd. on West; Ramsey/Washington Co. Boundary on East.