Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1994 12-19 City Council Packet
PRE- AGENDA MEETING: 4:30 P.M. - THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15 AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 19, 1994 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 94 -26 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting of December 5, 1994 2. Minutes of Meeting 94 -25, (December 12, 1994) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS 1. Metro East F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Mapleleaf Estates 3. Ambulance Bill - Application for Cancellation 4. Budget Transfer for Finance Department 5. Financial Transfer to Close Improvement Project 93 -10 6. Interfund Transfers for Unassessed Utility Improvements 7. Budget Transfer for City Clerk's Office 8. Non -Union General Wage Increase 9. 3 -M Contract 10. Temporary and Seasonal Wage Resolution 11. Resolutions of Appreciation - Human Relations Commission G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M.: Lot Width Variance and Lot Division - 666 Co. Rd. B & 669 Eldridge Ave. H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Maplewood in Motion I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Carver Elementary School - Agreement 2. Maplewood Townhouses: 11th Ave. & Ariel Street a. Land Use Plan Change (requires at least 4 votes) b. Zoning Map Change (requires at leave 4 votes) 3. Sign Size Variance: United Artists /Maplewood II; 1793 Beam Avenue J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Open Space Site #153A a. Approval to Purchase b. Land Use Plan Change 2. Final Plat: Cave's English Street Third Addition 3. Tax - Exempt Financing (Carefree Cottages of Maplewood - Phase III) 4. Maplewood Innovative Stormwater Management Project Update 5. Beltline Reconveyance Resolution 6. Stormwater Pond Design Standard 7. Timber Park Master Plan 8. Western Hills Park Master Plan 9. Release of Retainage - Steininger Construction 10. Community Center 11 -30 -94 Income Statement 11. Ramsey /Washington Co. Cable Commission: Set Meeting Date 12. Gervais Avenue - Feasibility K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. N. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5:00 p.m., Monday, December 5, 1994 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 5:02 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Councilperson Dale Carlson Councilperson Mary Koppen Councilperson George Rossbach Present Present Present (Arrived at 5:12 p.m.) Present (Arrived at 5:04 p.m.) Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Parks &Recreation Director Bruce Anderson Community Center Manager Tom Eastman MIS Coordinators Elizabeth Weiland and Connie Wermager C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda: H. OTHER BUSINESS 1. ADR 2. Ramsey County Retaliation 1 Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Allenspach and was approved. Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian and Rossbach Absent: Carlson and Koppen D. MIS UPDATE ON NETWORK City Manager McGuire introduced the MIS Coordinators Elizabeth Weiland and Connie Wermager. They reviewed the differences between City Hall's computer technology in 1989 vs. 1994 which is a reflection of the increase in number of users and the sophistication of the new network's capabilities. They reported on the new features available to employees such as e -mail and sharing of files, software applications, and the fiber optic link between the new Community Center and City Hall. There was a -short discussion about future capabilities including Internet, imaging, and shared databases. MIS Coordinators Weiland and Wermager left the meeting at 5:28 p.m. E. COMMUNITY CENTER UPDATE AND REVIEW City Manager McGuire stated that this review is being presented each quarter as requested by the City Council. Director of Parks &Recreation Anderson reported the number of membership sales and other revenue .sources. In addition, he presented sight operational issues at the new Center that are being reviewed by staff, the Park and Recreation Commission, and focus groups. There was some discussion about allowing the Community Center flexibility in setting the fees for room rentals as the market changes; the expectations of community user groups; and the need to re- evaluate the break -even philosophy on a regular basis. Mr. Anderson and Mr. Eastman left the meeting at 6:15 p.m. F. JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STUDY City Manager McGuire and Councilmember Koppen summarized the study of the proposed joint economic development program for the cities of North St. Paul, Oakdale and Maplewood. There was some discussion about the need for economic development on a regional basis, the differences and similarities of the three cities, and ways to fund the project. It was the consensus of the Council that this item be placed on a regular Council meeting for consideration of the appointment of a joint economic development commission after City Manager McGuire hears from the cities of Oakdale and North St. Paul with their City Council's thoughts. Councilmember Carlson left the meeting at 6:40 p.m. K G. COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Members of the Community Design Review Board, Mary Erickson, Roger Anitzberger, Ananth Vidyashankar, and staff liaison Tom Ekstrand joined the meetin at 6:30 .m. There was somegp discussion about building materials and a possible ordinance which would require the construction of a storm shelter for slab -on -grade developments. Councilmember Rossbach left the meeting at 6:53 p.m. H. OTHER BUSINESS Due to the time, Mayor Bastian moved that the remaining agenda items be tabled to a future meetin . The motion was seconded b Councilmember Allens ach and was approved.y p pp Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian and Koppen Absent: Carlson and Rossbach I. FUTURE TOPICS There was no discussion about this item. K. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. 3 MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 12, 1994 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 94 -25 A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of Meeting 94 -23, (November 28, 1994) Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 94 -23 November 28, 1994) as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 2. Minutes of Meeting 94 -24, (November 29, 1994) Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 94 -24 November 29, 1994) as presented. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: L1 Phase I Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 1 12 -12 -94 EA. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS Mayor Bastian introduced Boy Scout Troop 73, who are working toward their Citizenship Badge. F. CONSENT AGENDA: Mayor Bastian moved, seconded by Councilmember Carlson: ayes - all, to approve the Consent Agenda items F -1 thru F -3 as recommended. 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: I NMIVIUDT.1 !I 412 Checks #3408 -3484 Dated 11 -17 -94 thru 11 -30 -94 2659256.24 Checks #15692-15823 Dated 12 -12 -94 677 Total Accounts Payable 257 Payroll Checks 44298 thru #44648 Dated 12 -02 -94 49 Payroll Deduction Checks #44653 thru 44671 dated 12 -02 -94 307 Total Payroll 9849672.05 GRAND TOTAL 2. Conditional Use Permit Review, 1770 McMenemy Street (St. Paul Hmong Alliance Church) Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for the St. Paul Hmong Alliance Church, 1770 McMenemy Street. This CUP will not be reviewed again unless there is a problem. 3. 1995 On -Sale, Off -Sale and Club Liquor License Renewals Approved the 1995 On -Sale, Club, Wine and Off -Sale liquor licenses as follows: 2 12 -12 -94 94 - 12 - 146 APPROVAL OF 1995 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following On -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1995, with approval granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and health Inspections: Frank Romano James Dean Adeline Benjamin Applebee's Deans, Inc.Maplewood Bowl 2112 Maplewood Mall 1986 Rice Street 1955 English Street 3001 White Bear Avenue Eugene A. Beaulieu Gregory Paul Kuhns Ronald Ringling Beau's Food & Spirits D. G. Burgers Corp Maplewood Inn 2289 E. Minnehaha 2441 Highway 61 1730 E. County Road D Stephen Yantes Raymond R. Emerfoll Gregory Tulgren Bleechers Garrity's M. T. Pockets & Co., Inc. 2220 White Bear Avenue 1696 White Bear Avenue 780 East County Road B Tom McDonough Chalet Lounge Gulden's The Olive Garden 1820 Rice Street 2999 N. Highway 61 1749 Beam Avenue Richard M. Authier Harry S. Given, Jr.Gerry L. Walton Champps Keller Clubhouse Red Lobster Restaurant #283 1734 Adolphus 2166 Maplewood Drive 2925 White Bear Avenue Martin E. Mongoven Roger T. Claussen Mark Weinand Chili's Restaurants Keller Lake Lounge Red Rooster Liquor Lounge Southlawn & Beam 2280 Maplewood Drive 2029 Woodlynn Janel Kettler Thomas K. Buckley Ciatti's Italian Restaurant The Bird 1900 E. County Road D 2025 White Bear Avenue Club On -Sale Liquor License: North Maplewood Lions Club 1310 Frost Avenue Loyal Order of Moose 963 1946 English Street Wine On -Sale Liquor License: Taste of India 1745 Cope Avenue 3 12 -12 -94 94 - 12 - 147 APPROVAL OF 1995 OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA, that the following Off -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1995, with approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and health inspections: Arthur Mark Stein Laber's Liquors 1730 Rice Street Wendy Lauber Maplewood Wine Cellar 1281 Frost Avenue G. PUBLIC HEARINGS Gary Hanscom M.G.M. Liquors 2950 White Bear Avenue Marven C. Koppen Party Time Liquor 1835 E. Larpenteur Ave. Gust R. Sarrack Sarrack's International Wine & Spirits 2305 Stillwater Road 1. 7:00 P.M.: Public Hearing on Proposed 1995 Budget and Property Taxes a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the Proposed 1995 Budget and Property Taxes. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Finance Faust presented the specifics of the report. d. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. Citizen Comments e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Council Discussion 4 12 -12 -94 Resolution to Adopt the 1995 Budget g, Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 148 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that a budget for 1995 is hereby adopted as outlined in the following summary: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 1995 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1995 Operating Budget: GENERAL FUND: 419,080 689 488,860 1,608,350 983,910 5,188,230 1.796.090 City Clerk Community Development Finance General Government Parks and Recreation Public Safety Public Works GENERAL FUND TOTAL11,173 CHARITABLE GAMBLING: DENTAL SELF - INSURANCE FUND: RECYCLING FUND: RECREATION PROGRAM FUND: COMMUNITY CENTER FUND: SEWER FUND: WATER FUND: V.E.M. FUND: DATA PROCESSING FUND: PAYROLL BENEFITS FUND: 3,850 53,080 190,670 413,765 1,137,940 2,983,010 1,670,210 417,800 302,320 2.489.330 20 Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach General Government General Government Community Development Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Public Works Public Works Public Works General Government General Government TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS Ayes - all 5 12 -12 -94 CAPITAL DEBT OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS SERVICE BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET Estimated Balances 01/01/95 8,775 5 10,810 Revenues 20 3 29363 Net other increases (decreases)280 1 1 Expenditures 209835 793699670 693049000 Estimated Balances 12/31/95 89681 2 8,089,105 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 1995 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the 1995 Operating Budget: GENERAL FUND: 419,080 689 488,860 1,608,350 983,910 5,188,230 1.796.090 City Clerk Community Development Finance General Government Parks and Recreation Public Safety Public Works GENERAL FUND TOTAL11,173 CHARITABLE GAMBLING: DENTAL SELF - INSURANCE FUND: RECYCLING FUND: RECREATION PROGRAM FUND: COMMUNITY CENTER FUND: SEWER FUND: WATER FUND: V.E.M. FUND: DATA PROCESSING FUND: PAYROLL BENEFITS FUND: 3,850 53,080 190,670 413,765 1,137,940 2,983,010 1,670,210 417,800 302,320 2.489.330 20 Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach General Government General Government Community Development Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Public Works Public Works Public Works General Government General Government TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS Ayes - all 5 12 -12 -94 Resolution to Adopt Tax Levy for 1995 h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 149 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that: 1. The following amounts of taxes be capacity in said City of Maplewood, Operations Capital Improvements Debt Service TOTAL LEVY levied for 1994, payable in for the following purposes: 5,474,535 14,480 1,058,170 6,547,185 1995, upon the net tax 2. In addition, there is a $432,300 market value based referendum levy for 1994 payable in 1995 to finance the debt service on the 1995 Open Space Bonds. 3. There is on hand in the following sinking funds excess amounts as indicated after each fund and such shall be used to pay on the appropriate obligations of the City: DESCRIPTION 1967 General Obligation Sanitary Sewer Bonds 1977 Public Works Building Bonds 1977 General Obligation Improvement Bonds: Series 1 1988 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 1989 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 1990 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 1991 General Obligation Improvement Bonds: Series 1991A 1991 General Obligation Capital Notes 1993 Equipment Certificates: Series 1993A 1993 General Obligation Refunding Bonds Series 19930 1994 Open Space Bonds TOTAL 12,000 4,800 100 128,440 80 197,170 65,339 5,518 14,538 20,525 10.002 458,512 In accordance with Minnesota Statues 475.61 and 273.13, Subd. 19 (3), (a), (b), (c), and Chapter 297a and Chapter 162 of Minnesota Statues, the County Auditor of Ramsey County is hereby authorized and directed to reduce by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would otherwise be included in the rolls for the Year 1994 and collectible in 1995. 4. It has been determined that the following sinking funds have insufficient projected assets to meet projected liabilities, as required by State Statute, and original resolution levying ad- valorem taxes must be increased by the following amounts: 1977 Refunding Bonds $33,300 1989 Tax Increment Bonds 9 1993 Tax Increment Bonds Series 1993B 252 TOTAL $295,197 5. There is $257,530 of homestead and agricultural aid that will be used to reduce the scheduled tax levies for all sinking funds. 6. Changes set forth in sections 3 -5 above result in a net reduction of $420,845 in the scheduled levy of $1,911,315. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 6 12 -12 -94 L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Phase I a. Mayor Bastian and Councilmember Koppen met with the Director of Metro East regarding rejoining the Metro East Council. b. A presentation by the Director of Metro East on the Economic Development Study, Phase I, will be on the December 19, 1994 Agenda. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) 2. 7:20 P.M.(7:22 P.M.): Conditional Use Permit Revision: 1255 Coe Ave. (NorthernP Hydraulics) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the proposed revision to the Conditional Use Permit for Northern Hydraulics. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Mr. Rose, Northern Hydraulics f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption, with the CUP to be reviewed in one year: 94 - 12 - 150 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION WHEREAS, Northern Hydraulics, Inc., applied for a revision to their conditional use permit. The conditional use permit allows a commercial building within 350 feet of a residential district. WHEREAS, Northern Hydraulics, Inc., requested a change in the permitted weekday hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. -7:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1255 Cope Avenue. The legal description is: Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Vac St Accruing & Fol; Com at NW Cor of Lot 16 B1 k 13 th E on NL of SD Bl k 379.61 ft to Beg th S 29 Deg 14 MN W 117.56 ft to NE Line of Rd as Opened in Doc 2021912 th NW on SD NE Line 7 12 -12 -94 368.09 ft to WL of Blk 18 th N on SD WL 68.06 ft to SL of Hwy 36 th E on SL of Hwy 379.43 ft th S to Beg Being part of Lots 19 Thru 25 Blk 13 & Part of BI 18. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows: 1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit revision, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction must comply with the site plan, received by the City on September 24, 1990. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes. 2. There shall be no outside storage of goods, materials or trash. 3. The canopy shall not be illuminated. 8 12 -12 -94 4. The hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday- Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Sundays. 5. There shall be no overnight parking of trucks. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all L COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS (CONTINUED) 2. Mayor's Update a. Dispute Resolution Center Mayor Bastian suggested we invite North St. Paul and Oakdale to create a-dispute resolution center whereby neighborhood problems could be handled. b. Manager McGuire will schedule a meeting. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) 3. 7:30 P.M. (7:33 P.M.):2410 Stillwater Road (Gethsemane Lutheran Church) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Boardmember Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board report. e. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Jeremy Bork, Trossen Wright Architects g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 9 12 -12 -94 Conditional Use Permit h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 151 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Gethsemane Lutheran Church applied for a conditional use permit to expand their church and parking lot. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2410 Stillwater Road. The legal description is: Tract A. All that part of the West 112 of Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 except the East 156.0 feet thereof; Tract B. All that part of the west 112 of the Northeast quarter of Southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southerly and Easterly of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 212, except the East 156.0 feet of the North 453.0 feet thereof; Tract C. All that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 212; which lies southerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the west quarter corner of said Section 25; thence run easterly on an assumed azimuth of 89 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds along the east and west quarter line of said Section 25 for 1786.45 feet to the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road; thence on an azimuth of 59 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds along the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road, for 50.55 feet to a point on the east line of tract A hereinbefore described, which is the point of beginning of line to be described; thence on an azimuth of 239 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds for 459.05 feet; thence on an azimuth of 209 degrees 43 minutes 31 seconds for 163.42 feet; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds for 13.97 feet; thence run southerly 317.11 feet on a non - tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of 1185.42 feet, delta angle of 15 degrees 19 minutes 38 seconds and a chord azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds for 90.83 feet; thence deflect to the right on a tangential curve having a radius of 458.68 feet and a delta angle of 32 degrees 57 minutes 37 seconds for 263.86 feet; thence on an azimuth of 213 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds for 365.48 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line of Tract C hereinbefore described and there terminating. Reserving, however, an easement covering the Southerly 33 feet of the above described premises for roadway purposes, to be hereafter dedicated for a public highway and to be designated as East Seventh Street. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 10 12 -12 -94 2. On November 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of Council approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 11 12 -12 -94 Variance i. Counci I member Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 152 ZONING VARIANCE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Gethsemane Lutheran Church applied for a conditional - use permit to expand their church and parking lot. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2410 Stillwater Road. The legal description is: Tract A. All that part of the West 112 of Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 except the East 156.0 feet thereof; Tract B. All that part of the west 112 of the Northeast quarter of Southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southerly and Easterly of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 212, except the East 156.0 feet of the North 453.0 feet thereof; Tract C. All that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 212; which lies southerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the west quarter corner of said Section 25; thence run easterly on an assumed azimuth of 89 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds along the east and west quarter line of said Section 25 for 1786.45 feet to the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road; thence on an azimuth of 59 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds along the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road, for 50.55 feet to a point on the east line of tract A hereinbefore described, which is the point of beginning of line to be described; thence on an azimuth of 239 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds for 459.05 feet; thence on an azimuth of 209 degrees 43 minutes 31 seconds for 163.42 feet; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds for 13.97 feet; thence run southerly 317.11 feet on a non - tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of 1185.42 feet, delta angle of 15 degrees 19 minutes 38 seconds and a chord azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds for 90.83 feet; thence deflect to the right on a tangential curve having a radius of 458.68 feet and a delta angle of 32 degrees 57 minutes 37 seconds for 263.86 feet; thence on an azimuth of 213 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds for 365.48 feet, more or less., to a point on the south line of Tract C hereinbefore described and there terminating. 12 12 -12 -94 Reserving, however, an easement covering the Southerly 33 feet of the above described premises for roadway purposes, to be hereafter dedicated for a public highway and to be designated as East Seventh Street. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run- off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 13 12 -12 -94 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of Council approval or the permit sha1T end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all Design Plans j. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the des =ign plans stamped September 21. 1994, subject to the findin required by the Code. The Church shall do the followin 1) Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 2) Submit the following to the staff before the City issues a building permit: a) A plan showing the location and design of a trash dumpster enclosure. The enclosure shall be of a material and color compatible with the building. b) A screening plan for any roof - mounted mechanical equipment. c) A revised site plan showing a 24- foot -wide driveway on the east side of the addition. This plan shall also move the two proposed trees. 3> Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Install a handicap - parking sign for each proposed handicap - parking space. b> Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code requirement) c) Construct a trash dumpster enclosure. (code requirement) d) Install site security lighting, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Safety. The light intensity shall not exceed one - foot - candle at any residential lot line. The light fixtures shall be aimed or shielded so the light source is not visible. (code requirement) 4) If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if: a) The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b> The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150 of the cost of the unfinished work. c) The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. 5) All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 14 12 -12 -94 4. 7:40 P.M. (7:42 P.M.): 1929 Edgerton Street (Edgerton Elementary School) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding . b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Dick Donius, RSP Architects Martha Barnett, 1982 Edgerton Street g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Conditional Use Permit Revision h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 153 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 623 is requesting that the City revise their conditional use permit to expand a school and for the curbing of blacktop with a nonconforming setback. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1929 Edgerton Street. The legal description is: SUBJ TO STS & EX S 292.96 FT & EX N 155.04 FT OF S 448 FT OF E 468.6 FT & EX N 352.96 FT OF W 108 FT & EX N 160 FT OF E 313 FT THE S 112 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 Nff SUBJ TO AVE AND ST THE S 448 FT OF E 468 6/10 FT OF NO 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 AND SUBJ TO EDGERTON ST THE N 160 FT OF E 313 FT OF S 112 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this permit. 2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. 15 12 -12 -94 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council revise the above - described conditional use permit based on new building and site plans. The City approves the revision because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process,materials equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare,smoke, dust, odor,fumes, water or air pollution,drainage, water run -off, vibration,general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan (stamped August 29, 1994) approved by the City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after Council approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The City may require additional parking if needed. 5. The School District shall provide for evening car parking in the bus - loading area. The access drives to this parking area shall be open during the evenings. 6. The School District shall allow the City to construct a walkway from the City's property to the north parking lot. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 16 12 -12 -94 Variance Termination i. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 154 VARIANCE TERMINATION WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council granted a 36.5 -foot side yard setback variance to Independent School District (ISD) No. 623 on March 28, 1994. WHEREAS, this variance allowed the ISD No. 623 to build a gymnasium addition 33.5 feet from their west lot line. WHEREAS, the City Code required 70 feet. WHEREAS, this variance applies to 1929 Edgerton Street. The legal description is: SUBJ TO STS & EX S 292.96 FT & EX N 155.04 FT OF S 448 FT OF E 468.6 FT & EX N 352.96 FT OF W 108 FT & EX N 160 FT OF E 313 FT THE S 112 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 SUBJ TO AVE AND ST THE S 448 FT OF E 468 6/10 FT OF NO 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 AND SUBJ TO EDGERTON ST THE N 160 FT OF E 313 FT OF S 112 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 WHEREAS, ISD No. 623 no longer proposes to build their new gymnasium on the west side of the school. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council end the variance granted for the gymnasium addition on the west side of Edgerton Elementary School. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Setback Variance j. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 155 VARIANCE RESOLUTION - SETBACK WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 623 applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to 1929 Edgerton Street. The legal description is: 17 12 -12 -94 SUBJ TO STS & EX S 292.96 FT & EX N 155.04 FT OF S 448 FT OF E 468.6 FT & EX N 352.96 FT OF W 108 FT & EX N 160 FT OF E 313 FT THE S 112 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 AND SUBJ TO AVE AND ST THE S 448 FT OF E 468 6/10 FT OF NO 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 AND SUBJ TO EDGERTON ST THE N 160 FT OF E 313 FT OF S 112 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22 WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(6)(a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires the proposed gymnasium addition to have a 30 -foot setback from the Edgerton Street right- of -way. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 25 -foot setback. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 5 feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this variance. 2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. It would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance for the following reasons: a> The closer setback would not effect the houses across the street. The nearest house would be 150 feet from the proposed gymnasium. The typical minimum separation is 120 feet (a 30 -foot setback on each side of the street and a 60- foot -wide right -of- way) . b) The closer setback would not effect the adjacent properties on the west side of Edgerton Street. 2. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship. The School District cannot move the gymnasium further back and still meet the size needed by the City. 3. This variance is less than the previously approved 36.5 -foot setback variance. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 18 12 -12 -94 Design Plans k. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the plans stamped August 29, 1994 for the Edgerton Elementary School expansion, subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval supersedes the previous plan approval of March 28, 1994. 2. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this project. 3. Submit the following for staff approval before the City issues a building permit: a. A revised site plan showing the following: 1) Striping for ninety - degree parking east of the bus striping. 2) Widen the north drive to 42 feet. b. A plan showing the design of the trash dumpster enclosure. The enclosure must match the color of the building and have a gate that is 100% opaque. (code requirement) c. A revised landscape plan showing: 1) Screening west of the southerly parking lot that is six - feet -tall and 80% opaque. (code requirement) 2) Sod on all disturbed areas. d. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan for the City Engineer's approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook. 4. Complete the following before occupying the additions: a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards. b. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits and a handicap - parking sign for each handicap - parking space. c. Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property. (code requirement) The applicant shall submit the design to Staff for approval. d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure that meets the City Code. The enclosures must match the color of the building. e. Install continuous concrete curbing around all existing and proposed parking and drive areas. (code requirement) f. Install site lighting, subject to the Director of Public Safety's approval. Lighting shall not exceed one foot- candle of light at any residential property line. Lights shall be shielded or aimed so the light source is not visible. (code requirement) 5. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if: a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150 of the cost of the unfinished work. c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any unfinished work. 6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 19 12 -12 -94 No Parking Signs 1. Councilmember Carlson moved to request Ram sey County to Dost both sides of Edgerton Street, adjacent to the school driveway for "No Parking". Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all m. Mayor Bastian moved to direct staff to explore the opportunities for berming on the N E corner of the school site and parking area, and when coordinating the planning of other parks to accomplish this. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 5. 8:00 P.M. (8:20 P.M.): Planning Fees Ordinance (2nd Reading - Requires at least 4 votes) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding . b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. 20 12 -12 -94 g. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Ordinance and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 728 PLANNING FEES - 1995 Section 1. Section 36-26 _ of t Zoning----- of hereby amended as follows: Section 36 -26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required: Zone Change $410* Conditional Use Permit: R1 & R2 188* Other 404* Conditional Use Permit Revision: R1 & R2 38* Other 93* Variances: R1 & R2 82* Other 352* Vacations: R1 & R2 86* Other 238* Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created): R1 & R2 58 Other 131 Home Occupation Permit: Initial Permit 92 Annual Renewal 46 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 573* Code Amendment 352 Planned Unit Development 648* Preliminary Plat 700 Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension 113 Final Plat 169 Time Extensions /Renewals 113 Section 2. Section 36 -258 of the sign code is amended as follows: Section 36 -258. Fees. 1) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be $19 2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $75 3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $289 Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 1995. Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Al1enspach, Carlson, Koppen Nays - Councilmember Rossbach 21 12 -12 -94 6. 8:15 P.M. (8:25 P.M.): Sign Size Variance: 1793 Beam Avenue (Maplewood II Movies - United Artists) a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding . b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Boardmember Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. No one appeared. f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Councilmember Carlson moved to table this item for one week, to December 19, 1994. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 7. 8:30 P.M.: Liquor License - Gulden's a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding . b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Public Safety Collins presented the specifics of the report. d. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following appeared: Mike Gengler, the applicant e. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. f. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 156 APPROVING LIQUOR LICENSE - MICHAEL GENGLER (GULDEN'S) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to action by the City Council of the city of Maplewood on December 12, 1994, an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License was approved for Michael.Gengler, doing business under the name of Gulden's, 2999 North Highway 61. The Council proceeded in this matter as outlined under the provisions of the City Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE 22 12 -12 -94 I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Mapleleaf Estates a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Larry Olson, Midwest Land Surveyors Dennis Gonyea, the developer d. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. Land Use Plan and Zoning Map Changes (requires at least 4 votes) e. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolutions and moved their adoption: 94 -12 -157 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE WHEREAS, Dennis Gonyea applied for a change to the City's land use plan. This change is from R -1S (small lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -1 single dwellings). WHEREAS, the City staff is proposing to drop the collector designation on Forest Street. WHEREAS, this change applies to the property south of Brooks Court between Forest and Cypress Streets north of Gervais Avenue in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3, 1994. The City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment. 2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on December 12, 1994. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. The developer is proposing to develop the site for single dwellings. 2. This change would reduce the allowable intensity and traffic from this site. 3. The R -1 classification would be more compatible with the surrounding homes than the present classifications. 23 12 -12 -94 4. Forest Street would no longer serve as a major collector street. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 94 - 12 - 159 ZONING MAP CHANGE WHEREAS, Dennis Gonyea applied for a change in the zoning map from F (farm residential), R -1S (small lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -1 single dwellings). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property south of Brooks Court between Forest and Cypress Streets north of Gervais Avenue. The legal description is: The East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota except the North 396 feet thereof and except the South 290.4 feet of the East 240 feet thereof and except the South 135 feet lying West of the East 240 feet thereof, and Lots 4 through 6, Block 1; Lots 1 through 14, Block 3; vacated Brooks Avenue, Meadow Lane and the vacated Conner Avenue, all in Peters Addition, according to the recorded plat, Ramsey County, Mn. and The North twenty -four (N. 24) rods of the East half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter CE 112 of E 112 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4); and that part of the East half of the East half of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter ( E 112 of E 112 of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4) described as: beginning at the SW corner thereof, thence East to the Southeast corner thereof; thence North along the East line thereof Four (4) rods, thence Southwesterly to the place of beginning, all in Section Nine (9), Township Twenty - nine (29), Range Twenty -two (22), subject to easements of record including agreement in 41 Misc. 574, and Southwest quarter of Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota, and The South 321.27 feet of the East 199.10 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On October 3, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. On October 10, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 24 12 -12 -94 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Street Vacations (requires at least 4 votes) f. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 159 STREET VACATION WHEREAS, Dennis Gonyea, representing Gonyea Corporation, Inc., applied for the vacation of the following described streets: 1. That part of Connor Avenue east of the east right -of -way line of Cypress Street, all of Meadow Lane between Connor Avenue and Brooks Avenue, and all of Brooks Avenue between Meadow Avenue and the vacated Cypress Street as dedicated as part of the Peters Addition in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 2. The 16.5- foot -wide undeveloped public road between the east side of Meadow Lane and the east side of the proposed plat site that divides PIN 09- 29 -22 -24 -0001 as noted in Book 636, Page 556. 3. The west 77 feet of the Gervais Avenue right -of -way that is west of the west 112 of the east 112 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On October 3, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this vacation. 2. On October 10, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: 1. Lots 1 -14, Block 3 of Peters Addition 25 12 -12 -94 2. Lot 6, Block 1 of Peters Addition 3. The North 396 feet of part of east 112 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 East of Peters Addition and also a triangular tract adj. on N being in and measuring 66 feet on the east line of the east 1/4 of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 all in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22. 4. The south 10 acres of the west 112 of the east 112 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described vacations for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The City has no plans to build streets on these rights -of -way. 3. The adjacent properties have street access. This vacation is subject to the City retaining a 25- foot -wide utility easement over the east end of Gervais Avenue. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Utility Easement Vacation g. Mayor Bastian moved to table the request to vacate the utility easement until consideration of the preliminary plat. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all Cul -de -sac Width Variance h. Councilmember Carlson moved to table this request until consideration of the preliminary plat. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Preliminary Plat i. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the preliminary plat with consideration there will be another connection to Cypress. (Mr. Gonrea agreed to wait another week for a decision.) Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF: FEASIBILITY STUDY TO BE UPDATED AND RETURNED TO COUNCIL ALONG WITH THE OTHER INFORMATION REQUESTED. 26 12 -12 -94 2. Moratorium on Clinics a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Will Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. d. Councilmember Allenspach moved to cancel the moratorium on new or expanding clinics. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allenspach, Carlson, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Koppen 3. Wetland Ordinance a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Will Rossbach and Sharon Buse presented a proposed ordinance regarding the wetland setback Ordinance. d. Councilmember Carlson moved to refer the proposed ordinance to the Planning Commission for further review. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 4. Open Space Site #140 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Carlson moved not to pursue the acquisition of Open Space Site 140. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 5. Carver Elementary School /Community Center Expansion a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks & Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Bill Gaslin, Superintendent of School District 622 Gary Benson, Krause Anderson Kathleen Huyen, Assistant Superintendent of School District 622 Myrene Biernat, Armstrong, Torseth, Skold & Rydeen, Inc. 27 12 -12 -94 d. Councilmember Carlson moved to table for one week, until an agreement is negotiated by Manager McGuire and Mr. Goslin. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all MAYOR BASTIAN MOVED TO WAIVE THE RULES OF PROCEDURE TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO COMPLETE ITEM J -1. SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ROSSBACH AYES - ALL J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Open Space Site #103C a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report. c. Commissioner Rossbach presented the Planning Commission report. d. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Peg Corey, Trust for Public Land Peter Fischer, 2443 Standridge Avenue Charlotte Brooker Kevin Berglund, 1922 Kingston Approval to Purchase d. Councilmember Carlson moved to proceed with the purchase of Open Space site 103C. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all Land Use Plan Change e. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 12 - 161 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development proposed a change to the City's land use plan from R -2 (single and double dwellings) and R -3M (multiple dwellings- medium density) to OS (open space). WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located between Woodlynn Avenue and County Road D west of McKnight Road. 28 12 -12 -94 WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On December 5, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone, at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment. 2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council discussed this land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. This neighborhood has less planned open space than the average neighborhood. 3. The pipelines and high- voltage power lines through this site make it more desirable for open space than development. The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS PREVIOUSLY GIVEN M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS NONE N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 11:19 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius City Clerk 29 12 -12 -94 rod PROGRAM GUIDELINES NIeareneur OPERATING GUIDELINES FOR CLIENTS Small Business /Entrepreneurial Mentoring Program Metro East Development Partnership Please read carefully: 1 Upon receipt of an application, a preliminary determination will be made by staff as to whether the needs of the business can be met by the program's resources.An incomplete application will delay processing nd response b MEDP staff. IfgpoY you have questions, please call 224 -EAST. 2. If it is determined that the needs of the business can be met with the r ram r p o9 ' a representativeesentatve of the business will be required to make a brief presentation to the core committee at its next scheduled meeting. 38 The core committee will make a final determination as to whether or not the business will be invited to participate in the program. If accepted as a participant ", a MEDP team leader and team mentors will be assigned to the case and work plan will be determined. Participant will become committed to the following: a. Participants must establish operations in the metro east area or agree to relocate or expand into the metro east area. b. Participant will pay a non- refundable participation fee of $100.00. This fee is waived for minority -owned businesses, women -owned businesses and economically disadvantaged business owners. C. Participant will commit his/her time in a manner that ensures timely and substantive meetings between applicant and designated team leader. d Participant will agree that they recognize MEDP volunteers as resources regarding their situations and that all decisions will be made by the Participant. Submission of the application will constitute participants agreement to hold harmless and indemnify MEDP and its volunteers with respect to the advice, counsel and suggestions made or given, to the Participant. 4. Either MEDP or Participant may cancel the consulting relationship at any timewithoutreasonorcause. Participant will provide a summary report of the results and his or her views regarding same. Participants agree to an exit interview upon completion of their work plan. CONFIDENTIALITY POLICY Small Business /Entrepreneurial Mentoring Program Metro East Development Partnership The staff and volunteers of Metro East Development Partnership respond to business requests and business assistance projects confidentially, MEDP works with hundreds of clientis annually through confidential and effective business dealings. For those interested in participating in MEDP's Small Business /EntrepreneurialMentoringProgram, submitted applications will be reviewed by MEDP staff and theSmallBusiness /Entrepreneurial Committee. A copy of this ap will be kept onfileaM PtEDPofficeswhetherornottheapplicantisacceptedintotheprogram. Any materials submitted in support of or in addition to the application will be reviewed by MEDP staff and, in some cases, by members of the Small Business/Entre reneurial Committee. MEDP will P make efforts to ensure that all written materials submitted in addition to the application will be returned to the aPP licant. Additionally, members of the MEDP Entrepreneurial Committee are instructed to hold in strict confidence any verbal information that is discussed during presentationg to the Committee or to team leaders/team members throughout the P roject, In regard to confidentiality agreements, staff and volunteers of MEDP are not authorized to sign such agreements. Additional questions about confidentiality agreements should be directed to CherBaltzerat224 -EAST. ry TESTIMONIALS Small Business /Entrepreneurial Mentoring Program Metro East Development Partnership This program is .a must for any developing start -up and/or emerging business. Too many small businesses fail because of the lack of support in areas other than the entrepreneur'sspecialty. Don Stephan, ADA WN Corp., South St. Paul The MEDP program helped me in two main areas. First, the advisors assigned to m projectYP1providedvaluableexpertiseinavarietyofdisciplinesincludingarketresearchemploymentPYlaw, raising capital and, generally, in critiquing the basic foundation of my business idea. Second, the program provided me with extensive networking opportunities. This ultimatelyallowedmetoidentifyamajorinitialinvestor, which allowed me to start the business with enough capital to successfully demonstrate our concept. Without the MEDP o9r ram, the start - up of EnviroStaff would have taken a lot longer." P Bob LaBombard, president, EnviroStaff, Inc., Burnsville The program provided expert resources that our company needed at a critical point in our development. The program helped us to determine our strategic strengths and weaknesses as well as providing access to key information." Lawrence King, president, Split Rock Forestry, Inc., Saint Paul The program allowed me to discuss with experienced individuals their ideas and experiences intheareasofpatentapplication, marketing and distribution." Mary Olson, president, Materials Processing Corp., Saint Paul I needed to hear from people in the professional field whether or not I had a viable P roduct and,if so, that I was going in the right direction with my product. My "one on one" consultant told me what my next step should be and he showed me how to get to that step.. He consulted with me on a regular basis and helped me to get information I needed but was unable to get or obtain due to lack of time or conflicts with my schedule." Theresa Milligan, owner, Creative Biking,, Inc., White Bear Lake rod MENTORS A e p i e n e uriai PROJECT MENTORS Don Craighead Professional networker and consultant DON CRAIGHEAD currently works on a variety of consulting jects. He foundedCraighead & Associates projects. g ates in 1961, as a manufacturer rep organization for mechanicalpowertransmissionproductsIn1964heformedPower /oration division as adistributororganization, specializing in the sales of electro- mechanical automationhardware. Power / mation is a nationally recognized Center for Automation TechnologylogyC.A.T.). Mr. Craighead has been recognized for outstanding usiness and comet n9u qtycontributionsandreceivedmanyhonorsincludingthe "Certificate of Commendation"from former Governor Rudy Perpich in recognition of consistant efforts to rop mote andsupportthegrowthofhigh - technology business and industry in Minnesota. Guy de Lambert Vice President, MIMLIC Asset Managementg CompanyMinnesotaMutualLifeInsuranceCompanyPY GUY de LAMBERT is Vice President of MIMUC Asset Management Company, heinvestmentsubsidiary . g ny ' ary of The Minnesota Mutual. Life Insurance Comp* any, a $10 billionfinancialservicescompanyheadquarteredinSaintPaul. An attome he directsy, thelegalworkonthecompany's investments, including corporate bans commercialmortaesjoint 9 ° g g and ventures. He also directs activities at Wedgewood, MinnesotaMutual's master planned residential community n Woodbury. Mr, de Lambert htYry as aB.S.B.A. in finance from Northwestern University nd a J.D. from the UniversityMinnesotaLawSchool, Mary Ann Dunham Attorney Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly MARY ANN DUNHAM is an attorney with Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly. As an 'y associateinOppenheimerWolff & Donnelly's Saint Paul office, she arctices general r P 9 corporatelawwithanincreasingeasingfocusonthedevelopmentofsmallbusinesses. In 1992, she was appointed by Saint Paul Mayor Jim Scheibel to the city's Business Regulation Task Forg 'Ms. Dunham has a B.A. in philosophy and political science from Union College and a J.D.from Boston College Law hegS Mary Fahey Consultant, patent management and licensing Vice Chair, Small Business /Entrepreneurial Mentorin Program, ME DP9DP MARY FAHEY has a background in patent management and licensing. She current w r 9 t y orks as a technology transfer consultant for the Biomedical Research Center of Saint PaulChildren's Hospital. Ms. Fahey was the Assistant Director of Technology TransferfortheUniversity 9y re Development e sty of Minnesota's Office of Research and TechnologyTransferwheresheworkedwithgroupsthatromotetechnologytransferandeconomic m p gY omicdevelopment, ent, counseled entrepreneurs, and managed a technology development fund.Previous to that, Ms. Fahey was Project Manager of Technology ommercialization f Mayo Clinic whey h ° gy ortheMaYesheevaluatedtechnologies, managed patent prosecution andnegotiatedlicenseagreements. Todd Hanson Commercial Real Estate Specialist The Shelard Group TODD HANSON is a commercial real estate specialist with The Shelard Group, fp, Inc,, ,ooneTwinCitieslargestcommercialrealestatefirms. He currently specializes inindustrialandofficeY ice leasing and sales in the Saint Paul and north suburban area. Mr.Hanson has worked with numerous companies in servicing eal estate needs including9 , d' gmarketing, site selection and analysis, tease negotiation and real estate consulting. Mr. Hanson has a bachelor's degree eg ee in Marketing and is a member of the Minnesota Organization of Realtors and the National Association of Industrial and Office PaNAIOP). Prior to joining The Sheland Group, Inc., Mr. Hanson worked with af local developer, oper, R.L. Johnson investment Company. Kirk Kleckner Shareholder, in charge of Consulting and Legal Support ServicesWilkersongpPGuthrnann & Johnson, Ltd. KIRK KLECKNER is a shareholder with the accounting irm of Wilkerson GuthmannJohnson, Ltd. where he is in charge of Consulting and Legal Support Services. Mr. Kleckner's litigation experience includes business valuations dam ' financi age calculations, andaitransactionsanalysis; consulting experience includes business and finance planning, projections and computer hardware and software selection. Indust experience include automobe, manufacturing, insurance, bank and service. Mr.Kleckner's professional memberships include the National Litigation Support ServicesAssociationhgppotheAmericaninstituteofCertifiedPublicAccountants, and the AmericanArbitrationAssociation. He also has served as president for the Saint Paul Jaycees. Jefforie A. Kvilhaug Partner Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co. JEFFORIE A. KVILHAUG is a partner in Larson, Allen, Weishair & Co.'s Commercial Industry group and has ten years of experience serving wide variety of medium -sizedg 'closely-held businesses. He has been responsible for coordinating the accounting, taxandconsultingervicesf9 g or clients in a variety of industries, including printing and publishing, manufacturing, wholesale /distribution, and retail. Mr. Kvilhau is a member of the Minnesotaa Society of Certified Public Accountants and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He also is involved in the United Way nd the ryPrintingIndust of Minnesota. y Shannon Mason Executive Director Minnesota American Indian Chamber of Commerce Spence Morley Managing General Partner Saint Paul Growth Ventures SPENCE MORLEY is managing general partner of Saint Paul Growth Ventures a 2 million, private venture capital fund which invests alongside dedicated and le9centrepreneursinpromising, high - growth companies in the Saint Paultmetro east area which demonstrate the potential for generating substantial itai appreciation.Previous h w P • . sPreviously, a as with the Corporate Banking Group at Norwest Bank in Minneapoliswhereheprovidedoperating ... p pe ng and acquisition debt financing as well as other business andfinancialadvisoryservicestoearly - stage, venture - funded companies. Prior toNorwest, Mr. Morley •ey worked at Spent' Corporation (now Unisys) n computer engineering. Ken Roeh Vice President and Secretary Firstar Trust Company KEN ROSH is a Vice President and Secretary of Firstar Trust Comp f Minnesota. His primary responsibility adm ny P ry po ty s administration of accounts for individuals, businesses, and estates. Mr. Roeh has 30 years of experience in the estate and trust field. Prior * to joining Firstar Trust Company of Minnesota, he was Senior Vice Presiders n ' TTrust t and Execut st Officer of Mercantile National Bank in Hammond, Indiana. Much of his work has been done in Illinois, where he headed the trust function for two banking organizationsandisapaChairmang pa an of the Trust Division of the Illinois Bankers Association. Mr.Roeh holds a law degree from Valparaiso University n Valparaiso, Indiana. He is atYPamemberoftheIndiana, Illinois and Missouri Bar Associations and is a Certified Trust and Financial Advisor (CTFA), Ron Schifer! Partner in charge of Twin Cities middle market consulting practiceKPMGPeatMarwick9P RON SCHIFERL is partner in charge of KPMG Peat Marwick's Twin Cities middle market consulting practice and has been with KPMG Peat Marwick since 1978 'His clients havebeeninawidevarietyofindustriesincludingmanufacturing, distribution construction9 ,real estate, franchising, restaurant, high technology and energ Mr. Schiferl has provided a variety gy p ety of services including assistance with acquisition searches for small companies looking to diversify, designed compensation plans to be used for sales people,screened and interviewed candidates for top and middle management operational andfinancialpositions, designed and implemented microcomputer accounting systems ,business • p• g y 'developed us ness plans and developed strategies for effective use of ESOPs. Robert Schmitz President Andover Consulting ROBERT SCHMITZ has thirteen years experience in business, five as an independentconsultant. Since 1986 Mr. p Schmitz has worked with new emerging business ventures, as well as established companies, addressing their capabilities to new business opportunities. Through consulting assignments, he has gained experience in energyconservationasbestosabatement,atement photovoltaics, computer remarketing, sporting goods,magnetic media, distribution, food, non - profits and education. Over the ears,h ast 13 e has had the opportunity P y ppo ty to work with many companies including AmericanB• osystems, Inc., Corning GlassWare, General Mills, Heritage Computer Company, JohnMorrell3MLand ' p O Lakes, Riceland Foods, and SystemSport, Inc. Stephen E. Smith Senior Partner, Business Department Chairman, Small Business and Emerging Company GroupRpyDoherty, Rumble & Butler Chair, Small Business /Entrepreneurial Mentorin 9 Program, ram MEDP STEPHEN SMITH has practiced law in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area since 1967. Hefocuseshis s efforts on representing entrepreneurs and start-up, development stage andemergingbusinesses. His representation includes development of business ans,insta . shment ofaatonofmanagementandmanagementcompensationsystems, the establthebusinessandcapitalstructure, and arranging financing. He also works in areas of financial and retirementie# rement planning, estate planning and real estate development. Mr. Smith is very familiar with the issues that confront a new business entit and indesigningandstructuringvariousmethodsoffinancing, both debt and equity . His involveme ' u e is have taken him into the areas of leveraged buyouts, mergers andacquisitions, private placements of debt and equity, . initial public offerings SBA loanfinancinganp9 g d commercial loans. Mr. Smith graduated from Amherst College in 1964withaB.A. in economics, and from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1967 with a J.D. degree. He is a member of the Minnesota State Bar Association, Gerald B. Stenson Vice President and Manager Saint Paul Regional Commercial BankingNorwestBank, Saint Paul GERALD STENSON joined Norwest in 1981 and has over 18 ears experience in capitalmarketsandco Y • commercial banking. He began his career at American National Bank in Saint Paul in 1975, where he worked in both the bond and commercial bankingdepartments. In 1981 hdeA e joined Norwest Bank in the commercial banking area in SaintPaulandworkedthereuntil1986whenhemovedtoNorwestCenterindowntown Minneapolis. Since September, 1993, he has been responsible for Norwest's middle market commercial banking activity in Saint Paul and the north and eastern suburbs oftheTwinCities. Mr. Stenson works primarily with companies that have $15 - $200millioninannualrevenues. He has worked in and managed derivative products, Igp ,can syndications and priva placement activities at Norwest. He holds an MBA degree fromtheUniversityfMinnesog ty ota and a B.A. from Yale University. David Watrud CEO Watrud Leistico Associates DAVID WATRUD, the founder of Watrud Leistico Associates (WLA), has 22 Y earsexperienceinsales, marketing and general management. During the last 15 ears, hehasbeeninvolvedinn 15 y ears, ge management capacities in three successful emerging /growth businesses. He served as a stockholder and President of Oxford Laboratories during its formative ears from 1983 to 1988 during whichYgBch sales grewfromlessthan $500,000 to over $8,000,000 with pre -tax rofit in excess of 25 percent. WLA p pe provides business development and management services to small and mid - sized businesses to assist in growth of their organizations. WLA provides value -added marketing 9 p a eting and sales planning, strategic and operations planning, and organizationaldevelopmentservicestoclients. Harry Whately Manufacturing operations Dire 3M.' Corporate Qualit nd ManufacttYtoing .Services HARRY WHA7ELY is Manufacturing •ng Director for 3M Corporate Quality andManufacturingServiceswithoperationsinthe. United States and Mexicoawidevane manufacturingtyof3Mproductsformanydifferentbusinessunitsof3M. Mr. Whate lyhasworkedfor29yearsat3M, primarily in process engineering and manufacturingPositioHetitfour. ears iny Weatherford, Okl , as 3M's Quality Manager andProductiosuperintendent, four years in Costa Mesa, Califiomia as Plant Man er, andelevenyearsinSaintPacti 'n various manufacturing,lsboratory and staff positions. He , also serves on the board of directors for Saint Paul Rehabilitation Serv'h ices. Mr.Whate ly as a 6.Sc. degree in Ceramic Engineering from Virginia Pol Inhltsaute,Blacksburg, Virginia, and has continued formal and informal trainin g overvr thepast29years. rod APPLICATION FORM I%Dieneur;,, APPLICATION FORA Small Business /Entrepreneurial Mentoring Program Metro East Development Partnership Please type or print: 1. Business Name: 2. Business Address Street City State ' Zip 340 Business Telephone: j 4. Contact Person S. Phone Number:t f. Contact's Address 7. Nature and Description of Request: 8. Brief Description and History of Business roducts, services markets). is ), 1 0 1 f to 9. Legal Form • Proprietorship Partnership S -Co C -Co OrPrpre 10. Status of Business/Description: Start-up . Prototype rket Entrytry Conceptu Existing Number of Years Other branches 1 I . Management and Organisation: Please attach a listing of all officers, directo and principal ownership as follows: P.4sit14II Num % of Total Years with Oraann 12. Number of Employees; (Full-time. equivalent) 13. Number of Employees expected to be hired in next two years: _ Number of Employees expected to be hired in next five years: 14 Types of .lobs: 15. Has applicant, its principal officers, or majority tockholders ever been subject •tY t t to. Bankruptcy proceedings? Lawsuits? Judgements? Tax Delinquencies? Are there any existing tax liens? If the answer to any of these is affirmative, attach details. 16. Attach resumes of officers, directors and rind al owners.P P 17. Attach a business plan addressing history, current financial status andd future outlook of business, its products, markets, competition, and major suppliers andcustomers. p 1 PP 4 4 ,1 k 18. How did you team of this Pm9 ram? 1 understand the submittal of this appiicmtion does not commit the Metro East DevelopmentPartnershiptoprovideanyservicesofanynature. 1 warrant that the Information providedhereiniscorrectandcompleteandiagreetoabidebytheOperatingGuidelinesshouldwebeinvitedtoparticipateIntheprogramasaParticipant . Company Name- Type or Print) Applicant's Name: Type or. Print) Applicant's Signature: Title: Type or Print) Date: ski i= CO CDa C o l J nv ' V w gk 1111 d O O I r V J I Mii K t i `r 1 1 i t ark TYx : ^a3 3 tiLrykLa sx tCT41'C t 'YL . y y ' Tcb 3 +t L5yy ;?6.< k Cn F S43x^ : rxYs>;•Y:.. 'x" !. 5xdP3 °S` Sx: N x Myy v3fx: y WS tN N xIsw Ns:. » Hj'kSv7 >3.x'> Y<HSN+ .f J . '"f'yrP e35yfsyx :y:` L5 NxkR "vY`iK Jyryf`' .yu • .`niys`xrr siu °'fir nY Iv y:njvQ ssx n r !'2i.'krte. A o :Asrs`" i ^^It s hard to 2tsSf•• .Y . overestimate the value o havin af 3: rseasoned ioncsdoesslpf on staff -- especially in today's complex business climate. Business ventures, especially new and emerging ones, can profit immeasurably a r from the wisdom and expertise of someone who has already achieved success. Trouble is, most new businesses can't afford that hind of help... until now. ski i= CO CDa C o l J nv ' V w gk 1111 d O O I r V J I Mii K t i `r 1 1 i t a rk TYx : ^a3 3 tiLrykLa sx tCT41'C The program advisors provided valuable expertise in market research, employment law, raising capital, and generally, in critiquing the basic foundation of my business ideas. The program also provided me with extensive networking opportunities which enand .tee.. WHAT IS THE GOAL OF THE PROGRAM? The Small Business/ Entrepreneurial Mentoring Program provides professional business advice to existing small and new companies that show job growth potential. r6fess`onals from major win Cities firms Owners of their own small businesses ig advice h:.. and licensing WHAT KIND OF BUSINESS This program is a must for any developing start -up and /or emerging business. Too many small businesses fail because of the lack of support in areas other than the entrepreneur's specialty." DON STEPHAN ADAWN CORP., SOUTH ST. PAUL HOW MUCH DOES IT COST? A nominal one time fee applies to some owners/ entrepreneurs while others can enter the program at no cost. Call Metro East Development Partnership at 224 -EAST for details. HOW DO I BEGIN? Call Metro East Development Partnership at (612) 224 -EAST to request an application. i IS ELIGIBLE? Existing or startup companies currently located in or willing to move to the I needed to metro east area which hear from includes Ramsey, people in the professional Washington and field whether or Dakota counties not I had a viable product Manufacturing, research and if so, that and development or was going in the service companies right direction with my product. My one -on -one'HOW DOES THE consultant told PROGRAM WORK me what my Once a business qualifies for next step should and is accepted into the be and how to mentoring program:get me to the next step. " A team is selected that best THERESA MILLIGAN,meets specific client needs OWNER, CREATIVE BIKING, INC. WHITE BEAR 0 Mentor and clients design ag LAKE plan and time line and begin working together. Business owners /entrepreneurs often receive 10 -30 hours of mentoring time, depending on the needs. This program is a must for any developing start -up and /or emerging business. Too many small businesses fail because of the lack of support in areas other than the entrepreneur's specialty." DON STEPHAN ADAWN CORP., SOUTH ST. PAUL HOW MUCH DOES IT COST? A nominal one time fee applies to some owners/ entrepreneurs while others can enter the program at no cost. Call Metro East Development Partnership at 224 -EAST for details. HOW DO I BEGIN? Call Metro East Development Partnership at (612) 224 -EAST to request an application. i METRO EAST DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP FACT SHEET Mission The Metro East Development Partnership (MEDP) was formed to stimulate growth and diversification of the economic base and employment opportunities in the metro east region through the development of entrepreneurial ventures, retention and expansion of existing businesses and the attraction of new business activity consistent with the unique character of the region. A non - profit organization, MEDP is the economic development division of the Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce and serves Dakota, Ramsey and Washington counties. History May 1987 Formally introduced the Metro East Development Partnership with a kick -off and a three - year funded commitment by businesses and communities. Appointed a Board of Directors and formed a Management Committee to begin drafting articles of incorporation. July 1988 Held first MEDP annual meeting. April 1989 Received two Certificate of Achievement Awards from the Mid - America Economic Development Council for marketing and demographic materials. June 1989 Held second MEDP annual meeting. April 1990 Received two Certificate of Achievement Awards from the Mid - America Economic Development Council for marketing and demographic materials. April 1990 Adopted a three -year strategic plan, developed by PHH Fantus, an Economic Development Consulting Firm from Chicago, in conjunction with the MEDP Management Committee. June 1990 Held third MEDP annual meeting. July 1990 Hired a Manager of Business Information, in accordance with the strateg plan.g August 1990 Initiated a $1.5 million fund - raising campaign. March 1991 Held fourth MEDP annual meeting. June 1991 Hired a Manager of Business Development in accordance with the strategic plan. March 1992 Held fifth MEDP annual meeting. Responding to a Regional Need The metro east region's economy grew at a relatively sluggish pace through the early 1980's. Employment growth during this decade occurred at a significantly slower rate than the :metr © west region. The opportunity costs of this comparative lag were not only lost jobs but lost revenuet` for metro east businessesr and residents in the form of payroll, bank deposits, retail sales, real estate investment and property taxes. In response, the Metro East Development Partnership was formed to develop a regional approach to reten- tion and expansion of the economic base. Through its entrepreneurial development and business expansion efforts,, MEDP helps create jobs and increase regional revenue. The ultimate benefits of MEDP's economic development programs will be an enhanced quality of life and a positive image for the metro east area. Metro East Development Partnership • 101 Norwest Center • 55.East Fifth Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 • (612) 224 -EAST • FAX: (612) 223 -5119 Strategic Plan In April 1990, MEDP adopted a three -year strategic plan focusing on four areas critical to the region's economic future. Through the combined efforts of MEDP members, staff and community leaders, substantive progress has been made in each area. Entrepreneurial Growth ESTABLISH RELATIONSHIPS WITH ENTREPRENEURS ASSIST FIRMS WITH FUNDING COMMITMENTS CREATE JOBS YEAR -END 1991 1993 GOAL Business Retention, Expansion and Attraction ESTABLISH RELATIONSHIPS WITH w; LARGE EMPLOYERS RETAIN /EXPAND COMPANIES CREATE/RETAIN JOBS AT EXISTING COMPANIES CREATE JOBS AT NEW COMPANIES CREATE AND RETAIN JOBS TOTAL YEAR -END 1991 1993 GOAL Marketing PLACE ARTICLES IN THE MEDIA J, YEAR -END 1991 1993 GOAL Business Information/Research PROVIDE SIGNIFICANT RESEARCH SUPPORT TO BUSINESSES RESPOND TO GENERAL INFORMATION REQUESTS YEAR -END 1991 Programs and Services Identifies sites and/or buildings that match location criteria. • Introduces local government and business leaders. Provides labor market information suited to prospects, • Familiarizes prospects with the cultural and recreational including arranging confidential interviews with local amenities in the metropolitan area. employers. • Assures prospects of the Metro East Development Acquaints prospects with available incentives and financing Partnership's commitment to their businesses success in options. - the metro east area. Identifies business costs associated with projects. • Provides support and guidance to entrepreneurs through Serves as a liaison with developers, contractors and utility the Entrepreneurial Consulting program. representatives. • Provides access to a wide range of economic information Acquaints prospects with education and training options and technical and business data. available, including primary, secondary, technical and post- Enhances access to financing sources through secondary levels. participation in the SBA 504 loan program. DP FOCUS AREAS Demographic and economic data on the metro east area Specific business- data base, information for patent searches, product searches*, credit searches, technology searches, etc. Pro perty /building tracking and availability Business lead referrals all business /entrepreneurial mentoring programs Access to, financing options and available incentives Introductions to government and business leaders MEDP Structure P_artne hit) member Any unit of government, business, chamber of commerce or industry Made group located inthemetroeastareashallbeeligibleformembershipinMEDP. Each dues paying member in good standing shall have full access to all MEDP services, P ro and activities. Board of Directors: The Board of Directors shall be comprised of 45 members and shall meet three times or at least once annually to confirm, adopt or amend the bylaws that govern the affairs of the partnership. The board is responsible for furthering and contributing to the stated goals and objectives of U EDP. Individual board members are required to serve on one of seven standing committees. The nomination,/board placement committee shall be responsible for providing recommendations to the full board regarding vacancies. The board shall then, bymajorityvote, fill any vacancy. The board is responsible for electing the executivecommittee. Board ofDirectors Structure 15 Government 12 mayors/city managers 3 county. commissioners 15 Service.Jlnfrastructure 115 Manufacturing/Industrial Business Business banks utilities law firms accounting developers real estate brokers Metro East Businesses whose main orientation is manufacturing related. Executive Committee: The Executive Committee shall be comprised of 15 members. The committee shall be vested with the responsibility for providing the leadership, fiscal responsibility and settingtheoverallpolicyanddirectionofthepartnership, Executive Conw tree Structure Co-chair private sector Co -chair public sector Officers Vice co-chair private sector (elect): responsible for strategic planning Vice co-chair public sector (elect): responsible for strategic planningTreasurer Executive Director, MEDP President, Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce Chair, Entrepreneurial Committee Chair, Community and Economic Development Professional Advisory Council Chair, Regional Government Advisory Chain, Membership Chair, Programs mediate past co - chair private: responsible for Nomination/Board placement Immediate past co - chair public: responsible for Nomination/Board placement Two members at large MetroE.ast Development Partnership RESOLVED, further t the following persons are elected to the M[EDP Executive Committee as designated. Co-QbAir Private Sector ' Anita Duckor NSP Co -Chair Public Sector Will B 17 9 Mayor, Apple Valley Vicr, Private OPEN Norwest Vice Co -Chair Public Sector Bill Hargis Mayor, Woodbury Trea Craig Bollum. First Bank chair. Small Business / Entmreneurial Mentoring Program Steve Smith Doherty, Rumble &Butler Chair, &Economic Development Professional Advisor, Counc il Craig Waldron City Administrator, Oakdale 101 Norwest Center 55 East Fifth Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 612/224 -EAST Fax: 612/223 -5119 Chair. Regional Government Adviso' Dick Wedell Ramsey County Chair. Membership Lynn Evans American Bank Chair. Proeram Dick Hanson 3M Immediate Past Co -Chair Private Peter Ridder St, Paul Pioneer Press Immediate Past Co -Chair Public Bob Benke Mayor, New Brighton Two Members at Large, Norm Coleman Mayor, St. Paul Jim Adams St. Paul Companies RESOLVED, finally that the following Persons are elected to the Board of Directors Public Sector Mayors Bob Benke New Brighton No rm Coleman St. Paul Jim Chalmers 0Shorevew Steve Sarkozy*Roseville will Brannilang Apple, ValleyTomEganEagan Mike Werner Hastings Mike Bisan West S Paul Bill Hargis Woodbury Jay Kimble Stillwater Craig Waldron* Oakdale Kevin Frazell* Cottage.Grove County Commissioner Dennis Hegberg Dick Wedell Joe Harris Countv, Dakota Dakota Dakota Dakota Washington Washington Washington Washington Coun Washington Lamsey Dakota City Administrator PROPOSED MEDP EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS Dam: February 15, 1995 Topic: Working with the Media Speaker(s): Mary Dudley Aronson Ward, Inc. Mike Peluso Executive Business Editor Dean Bunting, News Director KSTP TV General Purpose of Program: County Location: Meeting Location: Tune: Ms. Dudley will give an overview of how to work with the media in a variety of settings including how to handle development stories and ground brealdng as well_ as how to effectively _deliver a message. Washington County Woodbury City Hall 7:30 AM - 9:00 AM Date: April 19, 1995 Topic: Economic Development Speaker(s): Steven F. Apfelbacher, President Rusty Fifield Ehlers and Associates General Purpose of Program: How to promote economic development and assemble successful economic development programs for your community. County Location: Ramsey County Meeting Location: Tune: Date: June 21, 1995 Topic: Polluted Lands /Environmental Issues Speaker (s) Steve Wellington Developer Dick Nowlin Partner; Doherty, Rumble & Butler Leads the firm's Environmental and Land Use Law Department General Purpose of Program: Give an overview of how polluted Lands affect development (core cities vs. suburb development); discuss the developers view of polluted land and possible solutions. County Location: Dakota County Meeting Location: Hastings City Hall Time: Date: August 16, 1995 Topic: Finance Programs Speaker (s) Kristen Wood Director SPIDCO Andy Amoroso SBA Craig Bollum or George Benz Saint Paul Progress General Purpose of Program: wood and Amoroso can discuss current and new financing programsgP amsforbusinessesincludingSBA504and7aprogramsaswellasnewfunds like Lo Doc and other SBA programs. Benz or Bollum could discuss the non - traditional funders could be invited such as St. Paul Companies venture capital reps and Spence Morley from St. Paul Growth Co. County Location: Washington County Meeting Location: Tune: Date: October 18, 1995 Topic: The Manufacturing Climate and Competitiveness of Minnesota and Metro East Region r Speaker(s): Dr. Fred Zimmerman Director, Graduate Programs University of St. Thomas Dave Beal Business Reporter Saint Paul Pioneer Press General Purpose of Program: 7_ _ID an and Beal will muss the competitiveness of the local manufacturing climate and the role of manufacturing in our economy.Zimmerman and Beal aze writing a book about this tropic. County Location: Ramsey County, Meeting Location: Time: Date:December 20, 1995 Topic:Economic Outlook and Trends Speaker(s)Dr. Sung won Sohn Sr. Vice President and Chief Economist Norwest Corporation Tom Stinson Economist, State of MN John McDevitt Economist, 3M General Purpose of gram:Similar to N EDP's annual Economi •Economic 'Outlook which has been discontinued,the format would focus on the health of and projections for the local state and national economy in 1995. County Location:Dakota County Meeting Location: Tune• AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: December 12, 1994 Aotion by; Co of i ftdors r Modifioa- Re J eoted....,., Date It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following, claims: 172,348.17 Checks # 3483 thru # 3537 Dated 12 -01 -94 thru 12 -07 -94 1.125.193.75 Checks # 15831 thru # 15948 Dated 12 -19 -94 1, 297, 541.92 Total Accounts Payable Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. Iz Attachments FINANCE /APPRUM.AGN VC)UC**pI••1E-F+:/ t{. - C.,C.- IA U IVI 13 U--.. R DATE' N LJ I B E 16 12 LAND *1*:I:'Y*L.. K I I or E Il CI•ECK 9 101) E: 13 Cr R I PT T C) Il AMOUNT Alyff t.Ji-,I*r 12 P1.JRC%eI--IA1}E* OF:' (,:)*F: 808.F ,265..25 B 0 S'265.25 14 15 4 v I34B%-5 .1.2/01./94 720768 BANK RIENTAI ... ... %31 C) 23.0.00 2."l 0 00 tof 0 0 of. A.*-.I of. I L e. V e. 0 to. 1o L.. I ... to) L.. f-h R u IM I...1 Cil-E• •UNE.,00 N V7 1. 2/01/94 5 51 :1. 00 F:-I:111-4 VILYTUAL L.I. Ho :LFISURANC E 41 2 3. S 89,.27 3487 12/01/94 661111 Y* SC')C'PCE:oR MSC C13 OC*;C'%FE*.F*-%* F;%E::F:' PAY 250. 010 250.00 4-C338 3. 2*2Z .12 0 " 01 IEAI" VIARWICK7 S) E-*RV 1 C'f Er (131 55 1*51 0 3489 1.2/01/94 0 :1. 6 50 OE. N IH F-,$ A to . C) F:T oI C E PRODUC-T E Q to) 1 PrI E. N T C)F-* F' I C E V.7 9 %:) %:)2, - F I-0)(3R AI I 1' E1 CUO 11 94 I:?'RI:e - I.4 1 Z. SEiYD1*::".1S.1C`1%I PU13LICAT' (:)[-%1(' 3: C*E 548.49 2.1 (38 6 .. 0:1. 4 9 0 1.2/01/94 541400 1.. 'TATIIYUP-1 I IS H. TREN: URER of ATE DKC) VER L I C' F: -AYA1--3L.E 633 . 50 63*,.v) 50 349 :1.12/01/94 541- 040 VVENN '. IS"Y'AT E -K. TIRIEWSUIREDR 1107 ...C)R VIEH I...:1: C 1::*I: E-1: F:- -31 ...K 2 Op 4 4 0.. 26 20..1440..26 3492 1 -----At y U T-1 f or w A-- ri. F L.,47 W16 1-2/01/94 722200 F:*LJBL.JC%1. ' .1. 1. S .... 94 DIEDUCTE*11 1. 2. -v e. *7* **11 S A.D.. C'.*P.. 1 I-,IC% 40 3/49,1. 2/01/94 5 51 :1. 00 F:-I:111-4 VILYTUAL L.I. Ho :LFISURANC E 41 4, 3 ef. 9 4 1.21 • 320500 C1%)RC)UF:* I-IF4 -'Tli 1-14C*DEC 94 F:-RE.*.IyI3:tJIy1 FVR DE. 1) U C or 1: C) 1-11 3.1727.20 r 0 Ii % iji . faDI.; 9 4 r. ri I r F , L T 3. 2*2Z .12 D I:*,- C 94 1:-*sRI--*IyI11JIvi DUE 7) 49 cos 7 %94 IIL' J')IyI F:./I ...or :Z D E* 1) to) C T 1 C 1% 1 6toilt., . 7 2 1. 8.1 603.04 f, 3499 12/02/94 843: 40 Cr AT1--1Y 1:3C.-HIJ-dE R F I-0)(3R AI I 1' E1 CUO 11 94 I:?'RI:e - I.4 1 Z. SEiYD1*::".1S.1C`1%I PU13LICAT' (:)[-%1(' 491 F .-DEC 94 1-:' L-:V.I:ELJIYI DUE 9** 52 asTE -DATA -'-GUJI: DANCE- -C-0-'T Ij l 502z DE:Qf, 94 1 ::'LIRI ::1.7.11,78.09 1*-!-'TA'Y*E:1S PMER K.1830 F-1 3496 1.2/01/94 J. 810.I1. 00 A.D.. C'.*P.. 1 I-,IC%DEX 9 4 ADD F: 'E E F- 'R EIT11 U IyI 1) U E- 3/49,1. 2/01/94 5 51 :1. 00 F:-I:111-4 VILYTUAL L.I. Ho :LFISURANC E DEQ 94 F:*RE IyI1UIyI DUE To. v1tDE:C% 94 F*SRE * 1.l. (.)I J -11 D I:*,- C 94 1:-*sRI--*IyI11JIvi DUE 7) 49 cos I. /2/ {'4 -0'---'-'---"T-.i2G5OG----'-'-7lvf.rot.i".I."I:E..:.,-.I J W 3499 12/02/94 843: 40 CrAT1--1Y 1:3C.-HIJ-dE R FI-0)(3R AII 1' E1 3'%500 1-2/02/94 11. 0 1. 9 SEiYD1*::".1S.1C`1%I PU13LICAT' (:)[-%1('33 0 12/02/94 E161."e-D asTE -DATA -'-GUJI: DANCE- -C-0-'T 11 AG l 502z 1.2/02/94 66-1750 1*-!-'TA'Y*E:1S PMERK.1830 y 1"'i 3 1. 7.. 4 0 317.. 40 3 r5 '132 560.76 3 5 251 115 1. .1 9 9 4 67 63-50 63.50 691 1 Eli 1. 80 00 180 .. 00 7 1 71' PJ! 4 Z-V) 115 1: 4 as 4. 72 6 2 CJTY OF PAG)JE 23 :1. 0 9rf i 4 1.0 f. 1,5 9 V(*)I.)(:*,*I--11:-I:Z/-(*','I--11::Cpl<C t•L' !' T OD •. 5 E 6 ECK7H MA"Er - ----- -------vr I .11 %F vr.IT F rETT 8 DATE NUMBER APIOUNT 1 . 10 1.) T.1 LJ T*'I* 1:7. 1%:3% ry , 0 0 3.1.4 12 I TI E' :: S* 2 7 *3 9 13 TITTE.. I I J.51 E3 7 14 1.) .1. LA: T.1 E: IS'* :1.457 B.,66 15 I...1 11 11. :1. 5 C* J.99. 1 19V (AT 16 UTT 2( 17 J*Y*'I*I...:I:T*3*1:%'*:*)I 207)1. 78 2; E 6:1. 8 1. 6 .. 78 Its 21 20 7.20 2( LA. T •1: F.'s 2 1,7. 22 11 TI E. E.. S T(S 2f 23 Li 3: T I E %S) 1845 42..6:1. 2 1 24 E. L. 95 2 53..4:L 31 25 TJTTT-..T. 474 32 26 V TI EKIS) 1080,1. 53. OC3 3 34 27 2250 29.68 35 28 29 36 n ee 37f. 30 3 1.2/02/94 530340 11ACIft 1.4..95 18 1.4..95 39 31 40 12 0 4 12/02/94 L 2 CE] ...TO ...94.69 o1i 42 33 TE LIEPHONIH'523...70 43 34 3i 32._27- 44 TII 6_1 45 36 1.2/02/94 5 00 4 2 6 M.. E.iC•Lr ll t'`C'!1"1t'iC l ! Y !' ! ''55 46 1.42.55 47 37 48 38 2'; 0 6 1.2/02/94 190400 Dr-::F:"Y*.. OF' 1-%IA'I*LJFZAI R'E: t. J F Es"i E'DNR 1::'r-.::1 --:cl3 PAYABLE 473..00 49 473.00 50 39 511 VO-st (30 52 41 53 42 0 3.50(:12/02/94 54:1.400 MINN. %(:%)'Y*(.)*Y'I:::PAYABLE 607. 50 A 607. 50 55 43 66 57441. /0 /9 4 541.400 III hill "MOTOR vl:::I.q FT. pr y A 1_1 I ... 16 1.6.1.6.,596,38 58 45 59 46 3!3 1-0 6 7 5 47 I*t*%%, •'*V()62 48 49 IYTJ I... 1 3 632,110.73 64 50 y 1.:1.1.A"'!/05/94 7 7 {1 #:J rRYDE.R I.A.) C ELmrFORXUS FOR A TOUR 1.94.00 194..00 66 51 52 5 12 I.W MA27) 7 67 68 2`3.75 69 53 54 51. 3 1.2/05/94 980700 ZICK S T 0 R I AI... 70 71 55 S: ` I E. EIRJ r 1 E. TNI 7 72 73 56 c, 1. 1 :.. V 1 :: J .. 1 1:711171357I' R A v 1::: L Rx. T A I FIT 1% 101 Y tOn ' . r--. c.) ----- OF F XTTr 76 T F.11 A v 1::: 1... &15 7 5 12/09/94 10:59 3 1::.1 I,*h!l . 18 PA (*3 IK 3 3 6 7 8 wi1-11:101 \ 1 T E* VI 7 c 1 -11:. H DO r SCA" 1 I"T I ON AVIOUNT 8 I.-IIJITIBIER DATIE NAIVIE 12 10 RIE PA1R & lyl(-ill,4'Y*/E:(*:it.iif:'111*--'N'Y* 3 7 2? 14 E-I.-::(%3 F-0R (%3E:I-RV 1.(:%rE: 2.50 16 12 WO)RAP0.1 SUI 17 13 I ::- I : j .; : c, F_.( -)F4 ( c,. zv:I - 14 EK B.. 72 1: 7S(J-F0F'LA-I::-S E"GAA: 2 125 3 2A 0 11411%5 0 v 5 0 26 ci7 1. 2.05C% EDU I 0 • r 50 » E 2. ml T R A 11, 1 DA G 2..50 1. 8 B.. 96 43 44 301 2 1.J-2/015/94 1%5 4 1. it 0 111111A.. ISIATE TREA1 (Ad'P*3-T'A-fI.:- DFIVE.Szl%*31 I ... 1c PAYAX3LA:_ 94145.1 .Z 1 ITI 3: R 3ANK 12/2/?4 !M , f•.1. ',`5 Z") 2 1 1 f3 i1451 2. , F:*/R Df::D1A:.%1T10N 1-2/2/94 F-./R 26.1449 so 74 of ii 1 5/942/0 1.2/2/94 P/R 1.3. ':v32S.- 1.0 5 Z-5 .1 :1. 0 6 J. 0 t 351.:.:1 12/05/94 4, 00 RE:IyI11*3c%E:*L..I ... ANEDIA13 1 624 1 I. 624 is J. B f 260425 5 4 / %. / 94 560 '42 t ry-!Ac.r I... -T OFFICE EQUIPMENT - COMMUNITY-CENTER 54 ar 10! 411 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - COMMUNI CENTER 12!j 0 I 3524 1. 2/06/94 560401 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - COMMUNITY CENTER 1.92..00 9 .1 '%51 9 6.. 60 1441 45i f 351 10 '51`720600-PO E %) lyI A 3 'Y' EK I"%'3P01%:3*1*A(`I':.58. 00 5B.. 00 4 7! 900.00 900.00 3j A I 5 r.00 30110) 3 1,52 1.2/06/94 50 1. 400 I*fIAD11SA(JI%I I%IA*Y':[C)I%IAL.. I ... 1::'[*:.94 PRIE11*11JIvI 2.1 J. 3 3.17 2., -1.3 3.. 17 _:..I '' 40 15 9 1.2/05/94 6617 50 1% 10 R11.1 : 1: 1%1 IS )'I* A T EKS F:*(*)W[::FZ IJ L.J'Y' 1 cS 5. 1jE 75.00 J. 5.1 07 5. 00 40.00 3'%*.*120 1.2/05/94 54:1.440 K1111,11A.. 113TATE: *T'RE_*A1:*%)(.JRI:.'R 1:3TAX 1* URCHARGE.: X F* A Y A 1-3 1 ... 1:'*13 J. L 2 9 1,60. 42 2. ml 43 44 301 2 1.J-2/015/94 1%5 4 1. it 0 111111A.. ISIATE TREA1 (Ad'P*3-T'A-fI.:- DFIVE.Szl%*31 I ... 1c PAYAX3LA:_605. 00 6005. 00 Y 0 i 1451 of 1 5/942/0 11,,1. "TA [% -kE:ASLJRE::RZ.)j w . -Ff..fy 1: 2 6 I.B. (32'4.67 G 14U 3 5 2 3 1. 2 051 9 4 260425 E:XF1RE:c c3 %. %)0 V 1 I T E 1 E. 1) 11 N 16.50 16,,'50 1491 1 I 3524 1. 2/06/94 560401 Ir11! 1,3*Y*AtTI*:-% REKT:[RE:.JyIE:.I-%I'T IS)YISTE:111 Cr WE.RIvI(-*)C.1'JE-I:;' :1.2 .... 2 1='/'1-x; D___cqp0IyIF 9.63 9.63 f V525 1.2/06/94'541.706 0-O.'s11T r .. ..4 1 --- 111H.1 -) H. 1-3 A I % I 11 /1 a 151 J. V*1. o 1% C)900.00 900.00 3j A I All, 154 3 1,52 1.2/06/94 50 1. 400 I*fIAD11SA(JI%I I%IA*Y':[C)I%IAL.. I ... 1::'[*:.94 PRIE11*11JIvI 2.1 J. 3 3.17 2., -1.3 3.. 17 _:..I '' 3527 12/06/94 540853 1111-1111.1 DI.*F1'T OF•1 R I..j I::- c"IVIE.111. .1. 1 Za 40.00 40.00 3 521-3-LZ/06/94 440y1or lyll*:: IA Al. --%' . -I.1EJ I I 4 A41 50 44 1. 50 i i . 012 t I j, (:)t.)(:::t• I ;1 ::::' C::I: "TY ( .)F VI i{'..l:i(: OD PAGE' 4 3 :1.2/09/94 1.0 a .5 9 v()UC.F14 E. l•4 /(.rf••11 .,K 1 E: C3 1 } T E..f _ ....... _ _ _._ _- .__... .. i 7 r( r ii •` ,ri :..1411 1 1" "+ :::viz- (,)I- %'Y F ::II t `l• 1l: is ! n 17 t :a 1C : :L.r ( :rI 11..l.r 1 .r r IltalYllC ;l::14 Y •1::: 11t.,lIl.{1:::t 11(`IY1l:: 1 1:::;it:C• :1:I:''Y':1:t:llI Alliot. %rr AMOUNT 1 fi 1 .! .{ C'• .. •; :. r r. . . . 10 !{ t3 rtI 11 I.:`. /0th /94 4:1.400 ICI1*{ -11.1 a : :)T'1'T'I ::: 'l EA t.l'•l:'R { `TAT"I DR I...:I:f 1::'l : I:::::'} l=-''iYABI...IE B*% * - i a 5 , iE 50 1 1...1C%rq r llft. i; :1. 12 /06/94 "'i :I. r C 0 1Y1:l: I• 1141 a ti"t''1 "t'f:: Y't:E: : :i1.11: { :: : IYIt:!'TT:I'F I :::I •i F 1.4 ., .!::1.2 .. 46 :14 1 :1..' a 46 115 r ..._....,... -_... .. ....._... ..._ _ _ _. _ ..... _ ._.._...___ -- l s{...! t.11 Ili .... . «I...! T I....f.l•• I::. .I: { I,.} .. ,..}3 1 :1.7()1.70 (.rt.11•: .!. a:} ., (.: i1•1... Jf) ., c•F::f (' I :..:I: f °' 1:141 {:a : i .. «: 8 a 64 12; 1 123 Ir _ _ _ - _ _ _ -- -- - A. j jay j :i. :I. ' - :i l 1:C '- t: 1: TY 1 i t.i41 ... I. E.af " °' I''tYl' 2 r :• 00 » «t} ^ 20 27 121 a `5 4 :I. e:'/0 /94 #:3:1. { 00 1 ,:31 ....... t:t .. lY! I'I: «h1A141Cri: MATER «5 04 2158 .04 28 29 22 v .• r •:Y 1't • +•tit's t•y , ` {•.1::.1 «•t.l {41Y ..« (... . . 1 { I IFRE A) 50 a 00 ;.0 a L 30 1 0 123 ; •: ,:} 5 .l.2 /t? x/94 ,a 4. 1.,::.:. I••IOI 11.Ywl::.1...L ., 1.141(.. a 12 __ _ 321 125 - -_ ,y,p. :} .} 1. [..J ai '7 "Y .t...'i 11i I 1 a t :J 1 rl ' ' •• } "1 : 1 • .I I .1. i... -.'4• fw..i. C ' E . P YA . I.. t ' ti 3313426 3) 5 7 :1. 54:1. 1111 t:} Y'('T'l ::: Y'I•I .All: }(.Jl•+a1: : : 1 VEDA 1:.::l: i., 1::'I : ::f. :.c:} I:: t {I...I ": .!. , }2 .. 150 1. ;, .. ,: { q 36 3 1. i # :3a .1. .1..<:'./.1.9/94 0 :1. j)+'30 .. t' .. Cr .. (.) .. 1. hl Y 1: » l .l (.)! I1 #... 1"I( II : ::I -, IAN(.rl :: MATERIAL 99 .. X30 99 . 80 3 29 391 i:-, - :.mss - - - -- - - -- - - - y - `, - ,.' • ! 7[ , ` 7[y . - - r, , - - a0 131 1 - 5837"'t. , i.1,.} G.. . rC.. 7 '979 - 4 . . if r ! ,.• i I i' "I i ' i'"1RE p 1 '. M.T. i. i•'i i... _ la a 1,12 IYI 1:f.ll'TI:::141t 141( %1:. MATER • v « c r r. »Y 4' j •a•-r- ._.. _ I ? } } a { , }S fir ))133 441 1. }. ?,a,.} C : • tf " {Al.Jl...l •.. }4.114 ._. 1 1... 1 r i,.} T ;, .1.1 u 1 • t - ;l.Jl: • , ' I...,. }a.t : , . .. r .} , .. ' u L j.o r. • r.• ,.y r-'t•y tN ,.' 146 1 :1. 51 1. ' 1. / 4 f i..08 /' , Al ... I ... .1.1: :1) F:21 ...Al%:} Y :1: (.r:} .I. I ! (. r _ . a. - a: 1. .. ,.._ - _ _ - - ---" 1 gl X38 c :3 i 11.2/19/94 02:1.000 rlYfl : : :Fti :I: .... I)1'Y't t }Ya'Y'1 : ::IY! I1• "a MA I I... & t r{I{ :1t.! {...I::: I::'I. «t:1S •Y'I:I :1:141 ir4 .00 a? .. 00 't X51 152139 i. Wit: t fll::f•T.:`t4T i°i.. :+ •I:1::: - i"'1:. ::; t':.: J ___1""11•"1'• i 156 X40 4 r5 00 a 7, i y sm .1. i.rl•:.. }- trr . r:. , t. r... r:: r• 1: 41 42 I.. #:3: i 1. 2/ .1. 9/94 02 :1. 225 A11 :.1'':1. t. Alh-I 11 Al -, IT CARE: I••'!•;( ?tJt. }t.1r.' {..'I....0 . :; . «. ;r` rl`•1.1. 'T't.)I ' :I. f {.«65.51.c }:y ,. ;. 1. 43 44 ay 8 1.2/ 1 9 /94 L 2, 0 1fyIC: R 1. C A141 1....1. 1411::.14! #:}t.1F•'i"'t...'RENTALT•1L OF 'Tl••IFi. W !',t.1i:,:} ITI(JI'•'S 64 a 4.I.64.4 46 1. ; { iz:} X:..i.J••fi t. :1 ffl1::.1' .1. i••1 I • ...f`Il .I. i'l:) .. 3::Yl.Jl.r .i. f Itr:}l.r! .t. t 1 .I. 1 .11`1,. }'ii::.'tA:l: ».;:}f'7 T.. 47 I. } #:3c {ti 12/1 0 ::I. t:3 t :1.11'1t:t JL i'11yI I'1:. :1:14ir :!: It1t:+ 11411 t:it .... t:31••r I C.1:1 .:1.4 . 6 1 .. 36 49 1. + #: 4 :1.1.2/1.9/94 030420 AI4IDI : ::R %3*C)IA „ 1'• ::V1 ... RI:::'T "T' fti NOV 1?4 ElL.DC) 50 52 1Crit`1`rT11.2/1.9/94 -r . r33ar C.} 1I I lf ;1: .. C;C)fl'r:... ? r::r r. Cr:.; Fl "„ ...I % r1t ., ... IS :.. .. :::.:,:}n :.; ; 53 t(:34 1. 20/ 1. 9/94 0 6 :l. 1. 010 ElA1411 . 1. ( :1Al ek KE'll ... I ... Y F'.. A.,4 7; } ., %5 i 156 OCI T ,(:)DE 1. AIN Jt f Y'(.)Y: {1 »1'; f:ti::.I.4,r'.I.4 r5 00 a 7, i y sm .1. i.rl•:.. }- trr . r:. , t. r... r:: r• 1: t• 1 . f . t . , r .. 1 . t. r.• •r•r .. r ...f r.ti.., .. f c: VOLK]AARE2 3 1.2/09/94 :1.0 4 v 0 to) 1.-11::: R 1 12/ DA 2 J.'5B46 12/ 4 1'51.3417 12/ ti 7 1.5848 1.2/ 0 1,5E 49 13 1. 5 8 ',-5 0 12/ 4 15 To51 1 17 :1,518,52 1, 2el 1. 5B& :1.2 14 Is 1 n 1.55855 1.2/ 7 al 0 I B 5 6 1.2/ 4 6 12/ 1. WR`19 :1.2/ o V,5860 1.2/ I 'M:.:..!, of of 7, W(X D 5 9 V0UCIo-IERA.I--IE:'A:% K F*%'f,:X" l'(* "l*E-**F*' 7 jr r - NUMBEHAR, NAITIEK D EK 1: 1 F T 10 1, 4 AMOUNT ATAIvIOUI 9_1 174'- -0, TO.- -c?)7-)'07'- __T37. hi F T T r.-. L. IYE. EK. )--n.... EAZRIS 3 6 1-9/94 071.120 BF::(3*%l'3*ER, ANDY RE: FAM-41) .... B(*.)Y'," )riASI<I::*Y*BAI ... I... a {) .. {) {} '={ {){ 19/94 0 9 W5 7 PITIT (:)(:d**T 94 jF03447' 1:.:I--IV I RONIT11-7-14TAI.... A; 3' (5) li: " (1 '3'(1: %) I y I I:.: I, I r :1. 700 00 788.75 7 I:Z19/94 J. 03. 3 150 BUILDIER'S' 3QUAFUE MA IYIA*T'I:-]* Al... %.%i 9 7 41.3 U P F'Ll Fi- 13 . .... EK(R) ol Ott 08 i,7-_ '--2 __ cI. /fir9 3. 0: L 8 7,3 D to J 1%. %) K N E: E W E:. E K 1"lli-TITAKRE Fill"S 5 9 15 2 5.. 9 r5S 19/94 1.10470 ('.%OAI:Zl ... 1:.*..l V F-- H I I ... F:. Al.-L..(:)WAI%I(:"E: 16s.64 :1.6..64 TR- [DAY -`A'F?T 52..24 -552..2419/94 1, 20',52 5 CEKLA ... to)! .. AR, ONF.' F'HONE: UISAH- % 19/94 V*52400 COF'Y UIPIIIENT .I NC% SUPPLI E: S E::QU 1: F•*IYIEI%I*T 136..06 136..06 J F "Fl. 1, E: E 3 .... 167.07 3: U: S 'OF*F' ICEKS ) OF. I. -AS 21-39.4-6 .... 13-1 0 1 _, 01 - 19/94 1.80900 DALAKY.FAT 1*-*I...(.)IIB 1 I--oIG ) 1.1232.00 1.540..00F'LU .!• hl. 13FIE. J S 150.. 00 1.I"I ... UVIB I N("* 282. 00 19/94 :1.90044 1)1:.:B].-I.-ZAI%4.1 ..TUDY Al ... 1-.OWAI-,I(:%E:'. 8.32 0.32 c....10 -Dr--P-T-OF-I--AT-.fC)R--'&--I!qDUSTP%Y 11-Ci')-I'S"-'--F.XEMPTTOlq--'C*E.TT _0 00.... FICATEM1::XI I Ott i"MiTIPTION 40.00or 19/94 210325 DOODY ITHECIAANICAL...1-%I(:' • pa F'RO(3%Rl:::(s%(_3 F'IYI'T' •OCT & 1,1(.-)V 94 1. 7 .1 0 4 FOR 0G [,-.%, 1 :: CC'S S PlIT OUT NOV 94 90 5.41. T -0 _705 ., r :l. . I. f , 11. .. tPROGr-"1-...F)S --Wrl' . IfT l 9/94 230925 WORK 6,150 0. Ot%) 6,15(%)0..,(%)0 1.9/94, 2 4 0.3) 7 5 A.F'F'ARA*T*(.J%l3 lyl 0.4111T.. ,x IlAl IA*f/Vl:::I--I'I* Cel ... I ;936 ..7 4 Rl::'F'AlF-%' & IYIAl l Ol 6.. 6 0 ` I Z 3 6 c ,6 t•.• Y •• t., op7 1: :' <:S:y t:f { :;('' ..1 .:1" . :`o 0 1.-11. 4 13 11" 0 11 AT I 0 I B 5 6 1.2/ 4 6 12/ 1. WR`19 :1.2/ o V,5860 1.2/ I 'M:.:..!, of of 7, W(X D 5 9 V0UCIo-IERA.I--IE:'A:% K F*%'f,:X" l'(* "l*E-**F*' 7 jr r - NUMBEHAR, NAITIEK D EK 1: 1 F T 10 1, 4 AMOUNT ATAIvIOUI 9_1 174'- -0, TO.- -c?)7-)'07'- __T37. hi F T T r.-. L. IYE. EK. )--n.... EAZRIS 3 6 1-9/94 071.120 BF::(3*%l'3*ER, ANDY RE: FAM-41) .... B(*.)Y'," )riASI<I::*Y*BAI ... I... a {) .. {) {} '={ {){ 19/94 0 9 W5 7 PITIT (:)(:d**T 94 jF03447' 1:.:I--IV I RONIT11-7-14TAI.... A; 3' (5) li: " (1 '3'(1: %) I y I I:.: I, I r :1. 700 00 788.75 7 I:Z19/94 J. 03. 3 150 BUILDIER'S' 3QUAFUE MA IYIA*T'I:-]* Al... %.%i 9 7 41.3 U P F'Ll Fi- 13 . .... EK(R) ol Ott 08 i,7-_ '--2 __ cI. /fir9 3. 0: L 8 7,3 D to J 1%. %) K N E: E W E:. E K 1"lli-TITAKRE Fill"S 5 9 15 2 5.. 9 r5S 19/94 1.10470 ('.%OAI:Zl ... 1:.*..l V F-- H I I ... F:. Al.-L..(:)WAI%I(:"E: 16s.64 :1.6..64 TR- [DAY -`A'F?T 52..24 -552..2419/94 1, 20',52 5 CEKLA ... to)! .. AR, ONF.' F'HONE: UISAH- % 19/94 V*52400 COF'Y UIPIIIENT .I NC% SUPPLI E: S E::QU 1: F•*IYIEI%I*T 136..06 136..06 J F "Fl. 1, E: E 3 .... 167.07 3: U: S 'OF*F' ICEKS ) OF. I. -AS 21-39.4-6 .... 13-1 0 1 _, 01 - 19/94 1.80900 DALAKY.FAT 1*-*I...(.)IIB 1 I--oIG ) 1.1232.00 1.540..00F'LU .!• hl. 13FIE. J S 150.. 00 1.I"I ... UVIB I N("* 282. 00 19/94 :1.90044 1)1:.:B].-I.-ZAI%4.1 ..TUDY Al ... 1-.OWAI-,I(:%E:'. 8.32 0.32 c....10 -Dr--P-T-OF-I--AT-.fC)R--'&--I!qDUSTP%Y 11-Ci')-I'S"-'--F.XEMPTTOlq--'C*E.TT _0 00.... FICATEM1::XI I Ott i"MiTIPTION 40.00or 19/94 210325 DOODY ITHECIAANICAL...1-%I(:' • paF'RO(3%Rl:::(s%(_3 F'IYI'T' •OCT & 1,1(.-)V 94 1. 7 .1 0 4 FOR 0G [,-.%, 1 :: CC'S S PlIT OUT NOV 94 90 5.41. T -0 _705 ., r :l. . I. f , 11. .. tPROGr-"1-...F)S --Wrl' . IfT l 9/94 230925 WORK 6,150 0. Ot%) 6,15(%)0..,(%)0 1.9/94, 2 4 0.3) 7 5 A.F'F'ARA*T*(.J%l3 lyl 0.4111T.. ,x IlAl IA*f/Vl:::I--I'I* Cel ... I ;936 ..7 4 Rl::'F'AlF-%' & IYIAl l Ol 6.. 6 0 ` I Z 3 6 c ,6 t•.• Y •• t., op7 1: :' <:S:y t:f { :;('' ..1 .:1" . :`o 0 1.-11. 4 13 11" 0 11 AT I W(X D 5 9 V0UCIo-IERA.I--IE:'A:% K F*%'f,:X" l'(* "l*E-**F*' 7 jr r - NUMBEHAR, NAITIEK D EK 1: 1 F T 10 1, 4 AMOUNT ATAIvIOUI 9_1 174'- -0, TO.- -c?)7-)'07'- __T37. hiFTT r.-. L. IYE. EK. )--n.... EAZRIS 3 6 1-9/94 071.120 BF::(3*%l'3*ER, ANDY RE: FAM-41) .... B(*.)Y'," )riASI<I::*Y*BAI ... I... a {) .. {) {} '={ {){ 19/94 0 9 W5 7 PITIT (:)(:d**T 94 jF03447' 1:.:I--IV I RONIT11-7-14TAI.... A; 3' (5) li: " (1 '3'(1: %) IyI I:.: I, I r :1. 700 00 788.75 7 I:Z19/94 J. 03. 3 150 BUILDIER'S' 3QUAFUE MA IYIA*T'I:-]* Al... %.%i 9 7 41.3 U P F'Ll Fi- 13 . .... EK(R) ol Ott 08 i,7-_ '--2 __ cI. /fir9 3. 0: L 8 7,3 D toJ 1%. %) K N E: E W E:. E K 1"lli-TITAKRE Fill"S 5 9 15 2 5.. 9 r5S 19/94 1.10470 ('.%OAI:Zl ... 1:.*..l V F-- H I I ... F:. Al.-L..(:)WAI%I(:"E: 16s.64 :1.6..64 TR- [DAY -`A'F?T 52..24 -552..2419/94 1, 20',52 5 CEKLA ... to)! .. AR, ONF.' F'HONE: UISAH- % 19/94 V*52400 COF'Y UIPIIIENT .I NC% SUPPLI E: S E::QU 1: F•*IYIEI%I*T 136..06 136..06 J F "Fl. 1, E: E 3 .... 167.07 3: U: S 'OF*F' ICEKS ) OF. I. -AS 21-39.4-6 .... 13-1 01 _, 01 - 19/94 1.80900 DALAKY.FAT 1*-*I...(.)IIB 1 I--oIG ) 1.1232.00 1.540..00F'LU .!• hl. 13FIE. J S 150.. 00 1.I"I ... UVIB I N("* 282. 00 19/94 :1.90044 1)1:.:B].-I.-ZAI%4.1 ..TUDY Al ... 1-.OWAI-,I(:%E:'. 8.32 0.32 c....10 -Dr--P-T-OF-I--AT-.fC)R--'&--I!qDUSTP%Y 11-Ci')-I'S"-'--F.XEMPTTOlq--'C*E.TT _0 00.... FICATEM1::XI I Ott i"MiTIPTION 40.00or 19/94 210325 DOODY ITHECIAANICAL...1-%I(:' • paF'RO(3%Rl:::(s%(_3 F'IYI'T' •OCT & 1,1(.-)V 94 1. 7 .1 0 4 FOR 0G [,-.%, 1 :: CC'S S PlIT OUT NOV 94 90 5.41. T -0 _705 ., r :l. . I. f , 11. .. tPROGr-"1-...F)S --Wrl' . IfT l 9/94 230925 WORK 6,150 0. Ot%) 6,15(%)0..,(%)0 1.9/94, 2 4 0.3) 7 5 A.F'F'ARA*T*(.J%l3 lyl 0.4111T.. ,x IlAl IA*f/Vl:::I--I'I* Cel ... I ;936 ..7 4 Rl::'F'AlF-%' & IYIAl l Ol 6.. 6 0 ` I Z 3 6 c ,6 t•.• Y •• t., op7 1: :' <:S:y t:f { :;('' ..1 .:1" . :`o 0 1.-11. 4 13 11" 0 11 AT I 7 1: :' <:S:y t:f { :;('' ..1 .:1" . :`o 0 1.-11. 4 13 11" 0 11 AT I 113d 1 '%5 f: 3 T.5 if. 2/1.9/94 302630 GH ... N313 Cl...11-41C., :rl.%I(*..%.,.FUEF-WER & IVIAj*I--IT/VE ... E 265.1.9 rill 4 36 37 61-TUP Jol 129 ., $30 voucHRE CITY OF• * IVIAPI ... FA1001)6 3 1.2/09/94 A. 0 59 1.2/19/94 VC)UC*1 ER/CHEC K R E* 6 1 'T E* R T 1.994 R J. A 11)E:C% Y C%L_ I 1.6 4 watt 1. 15 31 f e>1 /:I.9 / "Y 4 12 DUANE.Fl..AP-1 REVIEW FoRC11 914 .... 12 5 i A2 I REV1E W F*R0J 9 4---2 9F'I ... All H. .1 501 i 101 rR w 'T 3IFIATE: F 94 .3L . F V .... z - 1:: REV TEM 94. 1. 70 00 1. 2 0.. 2' 5 145 T 342. 5115 CHE-*CK 141J1Y1BEF UNATE".E I N•1111 DE-( *:)%Cl:-,']'I:**T 1: (:)1-%1 AMOUNT IvIOUI-,IT F'L.AN EM PR'00f 94 .... 60 1. (1) 2., 2,5 7.n 09..00 48 1 . ' ..7.00 vi 1. %M63 12 19 /0 4 115 0 0 EYECUI (11 Ir IT111: CE:11..Al 10ITIVICH) *I: T1 1: CZ0A.. 4E 247., 50 247.. 50 0WDATE.R WREATFIS 7.00 141 1.-,1'%5864 1.21/19/94 260400 FAIJIS)'T. DAP-111.1 7TRAVE.I.- & TRAIN 11-46'5.35 3 !.5 13 0 0 1.-1 C.)FUS) NE L.. I.... J UD TI 106.47 106.47 152 i 1:',3 1t.-if-379 1.2/19/94 3 7 { ?0E) 18 tai 1'%5865 1.2/1.9/94 260450 C"'ONTROL-413 1:11C CeHEDVIRIA %3 147.60 20 7:1.9.00 C FIE M' 1 C, A I ... (13 518..4}666.06 211 4- 24 ' I ..,p .... .. V1( 6 005 1. '%5 B 6 6 1.2/1.9/94 260560 F E: 1-4 P-I E* R DAVI*-*RI-**F*UI%ID .... PRE.-1%:3CHC)CR.. TI. MTA-11.,16)10.50 1.0 i. It, 0 57 1. 1,5 81 Elt 0 12/19/94 3f:04403,1 0'. 1%31 F 1. 00. 00 1.00.00, 0120 1. ',5 8 6 7 12/19/94 270300 FL.. E X 1: B I ... E P1 PE TOOL.. C*O'(:)Mf:'(:)Al-,IY MAINTENANCEE MATERIAL..1. 99 148.99 27 21 22 1. 158 1. licil z J.'9 /94 1 »f :3 0"." 1——1. 10 S T'RY UFT'I ... 1EF J* NC..f" UI I" 0 PROGRAM 13)UPPI ... 1: E.1.2.62 42.,62 29 i;, 23 1',5869 12/19/94 2(30476 FRAVI.1 •IAUI_F*k* E. FU 1-%11) .... .1.1"'9 5 n 00 9 0 261 1. 1%-5870 1.2/1.9/94 300500 G & K %13 E: F1 v I C% 1:ES JI%ITF*0IRIvIc%3 CI ... OTI-4.1 1-140)278.70 14135 4 2711 U1.41FORITI.c.; & CL.01••111%IG 3 25 4 1, 9 115 UI-11 1. F & C.A.13TH 1 1,16 81 . 28 37; 291 UFU •C)RI11S ) & Ce I ... C)TI-41'FIC.)1. 7 8.1 3 15 873.28 3 401 15# 7tu 1 /94 0C359e)0,5 .9..41 421 44-31 3311 1',5872 12/19/94 301.6%50 G E 11 E R A I ... OF PRODUCT UPFtJr:-:S OFFICE 1.1.6.191 4.4; 451 113d 1 '%5 f: 3 T.5 if. 2/1.9/94 302630 GH ... N313 Cl...11-41C., :rl.%I(*..%.,.FUEF-WER & IVIAj*I--IT/VE ... E 265.1.9 265.19 36 37 61-T UP Jol 129 ., $30 38 P)1,5875 1.2/19/94 31.06,-5#0 D3C.3*01:1.011ER *13F Al...T 1.994 R J. A 11)E:C% Y C%L_ I 1.6 1.6,.n 1536.60 watt 1. 15 31 f e>1 /:I.9 / "Y 4 520200 DUANE.Fl..AP-1 REVIEW FoRC11 914 .... 12 5 A2 I REV1E W F*R0J 9 4---2 9F'I ... All H. .1 501 rR w 'T 3IFIATE: F 94 .3L . F V .... z - 1:: REV TEM 94. 1. 70 00 1. 2 0.. 2' 5 145 1::#I...Al%l REVIEN 1: -'s R 0 J 94. 1.342. 5115 F'I ... All REEVE EM F'ROZY 94 .... 49 223.7!.5 F'L.AN EM PR'00f 94 .... 60 1. (1) 2., 2,5 7.n 09..00 48 1 . ' ..7.005$T-77 0WDATE.R WREATFIS 7.00 L',5 B. 7 S 12/ 1 9/94 3 !.5 13 0 0 1.-1 C.)FUS) NE L.. I.... J UD TI 6VE .11-C CA-E. Al ... L-(*IWAlq('106.47 106.47 152 i 1:',3 1t.-if-379 1.2/19/94 3 7 { ?0E)VIIJI-Ty I:: ... F F-MT FIOV 9 el COMM C.TR 1.3,1673..00 F,R0C%jI:;%1I_*:. PMT FIOV 94 CfOIVIIVI C.'eT F -%,7:1.9.00 R331:11T NOV 94 CoPOITIVI C"YRF'RC GRE 719.00 ....I ..,p .... .. V1( 6 005 57 1. 1,5 81 Elt 0 12/19/94 3f:04403,1 0'. 1%31 F 1. 00. 00 1.00.00, ZY " R 3 S) ..p I R E CYC I ... E 1) 290-001: 3 . 1. 1.2/1.9/9 4 4006 50 . r 1%3* AFIF 1'. AI*%IC E* 1) *.1*. 1 %1:: Al... :1 11 C AF ... ....S) K. P Ir ..: % r I (". 1- C*- 1*1, 1:1* (•16 V (-6 1 1::* 1) i 2 t, t.lLli.:1••lI :1::.,1:'.C .I.'T•OF IYIA1 •"I ... EKWOOD t"•tt: /!:« 7 3 3.2/09f'r'y I. i ;t { 'VOt.lt.;l'•II 1 /Crt• # ! #: 1. ; f t..i•i: I tii . 4 iaF I 'I: :R :I: t:)I) A.2 5 I ' 6 v0Ui rI II:: :1 :4/I 7 C.d l••1M:.t., K t..l'•II::.t•: K VEND DOR I. T VI I 'T' E::IYI CIFIECK a 1 1Y1BI::.I•Z I }r`t'1'I:.IAt.1I {I::.I•R X71::;: }t..R.I.I °'T 10 1-4 AlYit.tlJN'T'AIY1OtJN'T'10 11 10 11 fat:::1.2/ 1 { f t;:i4a rk:.,h \il:. Y I •If.1rIII• T ;i :.:. ; .: - .:; .I...fYl • .11 AI , \' .. }C:.! t :1. t.,i:::Y ::, : ;: '_ - Y :s :;:•- -- T'1:::1 II \. }k:.I t ` .I: i., t It. i:1f °t °' .I. C.I:::123 . 92 r.;..;;- - ;.;-l. a... .. r 2 i •, 1 I. 2/ :1. 9/ 94 40.1. , 00 1< J •' FI Y %S%I•tit•,.I•` -tl I }111 -l• 111" }2 r ., 2 • t .. rC 1 n } 13 N 14 I.::'<# :384 1.2/ 1. 9/94 4011.. 00 rUI.•.L 'f'YIYI1::. FA Y {i•'i•4#.t.J A I ..}l.l•'r'`I.. U:.S 39 N 91 39. 15 16 I.:i #:I< :s :: .l :!. { f i r 4th 1 #:3 ;r 8 ~rt.11l! ": !{ I: l;:fi' f 1'' .I: IIt CO.11(11... I <.I.11 - 1:: r•..j 1, .: ti{5 r• 1 17 1 r 18 J. \af »y86 I.2/ :1.9/9 l q 1LE-P)EY i.'.i. l N . :r'I h•I'r !' X11 i i'1Wc"tCI ..... ....... t.:1...N .4.. :1. t> 19= 20 .Y # #:l. /1 9 4 420 .I. 2 K I1'!Nt: «Y y •T'..1•1•+..1.l•+.I :,I••'t.lil ••.. WINTER k# .1.1•l(4-00 4 a : i ' 21 2z I. "'.fti -i. ri _-j:l.I... a i:.. N f a !l ++T'l ti1 ['I:f1 :1:11:I:hlt:wi {3 4 .if.a .• " «;.J- - - --i.;, M 23 7':1'r •ti ki ;j 2Q 1. 5(1. y /.{.2. r 1...A\ }I TZC)U 1 C•` Y ..+I•t I 1 tit .I' 1'ti '} ! I T' t I•• /I: 't•t.1 'r 1 tYI!•• I1 . r .E N .. .. .. ICI 1: 1:• 1.ti ) 1 >t 1,;i 1 5 Zb 1. ::1 #: 90 1.,c:': / 9 /94 46000 ILEE L.. f.1'-II::.I•,YL I'ti.h• L)F .••' WINTER WREATHH 00 7 010 si1 27 2b r# :1.r.yvc• % .-I s -- `' Y A1.7 J :: _•; .., .{ate° - i" . t. 29 30 r' ' :1.2/ 19/94 46 :1.5 0 1...k:.W.i_ S i..•I::.01I r 1 Y ,. %.) ;+1+.1 h• t1I II} IY1k „ I Ix!•'F }i••1'I'F 1• Nf }t'350 . 100 i a 1 i32 J..:ti #:S {>?,:}I.2/ 1.9/> 4 470700 1...11...I...:i V ;;rt.l tt.11:s,il II1:l l1II:: :F i t1z11::1= 1* 1* ; i :G IiC3 204 i' ' 133 ADVl: «RI' _1. St.1. h1t. ;1; ; 1..N 1 1 :i5 J. :a #:li •1.x:'./1 / {>•14805 1 A .J 4I...t:lhlG; 1...`tll: '.' 'T'i !' E:t:t.a:I:1 °`1YII:::I1'T'illt:ltal T...li:;I <l::'T'1.1. , ft: {t p ,f t 9r'.. t.lt i3, J -,. _ j . . .... ..........._..,_._.I. .. .. ,.1 fC, t:I.TI...I.l h „i:t.1 T rI:.11 T _.. ._.___... -, __ .. _„ I. 'YJC - 7fi."1Y T k":i:lt.T1' 1 ,. !• tttt.,C.T"3 96 .• 223 Kati' 1 1896 1.2 501505 I lAC7% L 1: #..I••! t3l-+:1::.' • a 2 t. „ 50 1 i 1 F'I• *0C3*l• AIY1 ;:}Ul"'I•'`I.A I : « { :}l.., .1 1 i.42 t t! +1. .. .. \.f1IYl 'I °`k..i.i:•' }37 1 taa 1.58 1. 2/ 19/ 94 51:1.600 1YIA% %)Y t %t :i1:ZI='llr 1:: :t:. I :I: ICI "t"l:t`1IIt:l:1 .481. 2 . 1:•1f w•I.., 812.. ,i4 45` 1.46 ti#.1 r #1. l .. 7 {l _. .1:}r•1f ; t '• 3 2 . t. 9 Y .' .. _ {'.;. , .. ---ICC.-;Ot.lt.Ji ! t:',t:ll ,.} rrtt.a.r .1: Clll 1 +_ - t .. - - - • y • ;•,i,,i: •• ., :I: IAA a t':l C[.I1,. T UC TI CH _ l.rOE T,.}r. - - - ._I. N . _ .214 147 4e I.'..1 99 1.,:'x'1 a.:0i °1YIt•.i.,U I.1-1:». IYi.t.t.r1••ItI::.1._t t ::.t••1.1. t..I...I::. A1...1 „. #.ti;111-It.r1 450 .00 t:50... 00 1 50 1. 1 00 1-2 /3. 9/914 t,, >0 IYI1::.1 : »h•1AN , ' AVI1:• tax t.l1 I.I 1 'C,1 \1YI \;} (.rl...t hICJ 300.100 0 0 0k;j G%! 52 7 _-.1. \. 9.x.1.rp .I. /:1:9'/'c' ? -/, *F_ti IYlT.3I•'[:1"tiIYI 'r.T.tiI :I:Itilt:f::t - ..-I'I .l. ,: } .rl. »1...I.. ItII::: t.Tf:} T:C'JI 11C 'Y l: T.1: «r 1 l..: } f::.. - :...- i 1 53 54 5 •'r'r r'' r'5 0.%a.: ar t 1... D I: :J[ ;( :1FAI••1•x.1.. l.. ! Itt •''1. 'ir} lFf ..I:I Atr 1`1 301.00 i 00 56 2 },.1 l ! .i,1 ti 11 a(.f T t'• t I.+J `t: : }'i I::. Ir,1.I. ;: }!:«t.11f <:;t" iti :i: I »'•T' 3: 0114C, _. Y .• .s t: tt r.. t:: { 0 J•c t4+124'11 .L ' /f 5 1. t IYII %F ;: r11 F. T 'Y Irt::! l li: 7 i...t I= w'l..l.._ : F rti.1 hl I I41t -...__ . _I .} { 2 t, tc:)Uc:i!"•Irti.E2 C;:r.T OF:` VIA - t.1 -M001) 2 i 1. :1.0 1 ,5 tt.al aC`!••1l::.I•; f 1 "1••IL•:.C' l IR IEG) I. :3'Tl.l••' 3 r , , 4 5 .. 16 7 6 Ut.lUC.1••11: R / I , -:1•d! :. Cr i t :TIT . C;T Et y . ` "C i .: ^ ITUT " g 141.1lY1Bl: DATE Nl.alYilL•{L•:.!-s NAME' DI::.83CP 1 h•'T 1. Oil A110l.!N'T' 1iY1t.31.31• 10 1 ' 12 15906 ' .1. ./ 1. 9/ x o " I"J#'iT',>+"[C M-4- Cas ., '. N -s ' ry y • r t - yr!_- .. -017. 13 oft t0 . lifl:Fll'T'I ltil`i {tt:l : :: 1' ATl::F+ IA1...S 3r' .`. to 15 12 16 t3 f.590r :1. / - 1: -- - _ __ . 7 J. :. T.3 •,E - -0 ST. FI :f b i - T" F"s'T .. -_ ,:Y .:} - 'I .:V .-- `F- `A•t s ....... .. ::... ,.Y ;5: ) 5 .. « - 3 17 14 i81 ' 15 15908 : 1.2/1.9/94 if0. "'. 50 ! ED- ..{:301 -1 ZY l:::'tl! i:::l:•l:C t t..:l ' t 1...i:..t: J1 Jiltlt: E . :0 „ wicY » : 19 0 .. ,. 6 20 16 21 X17 J. ti { r 0 1. 2/ J. { x /94 }•`•)dr',,5 1 Cil••!'T' :l: NGAL..1::: •i::t:lhlFN T C1*0FZF:' .. w31.1XI;:iCAR:f: f=''i' 1011 KS lYl :lrl {C :i1 »1:1:1"'# 3 44.71 44.71 z? 23 t 1 w 9 id: ' XJ' i "F { ? C:7.1:.tl. i C:7 1 1•'i l 'i VJT P1::.1 L 'Y. .1. I `{ Al 1. , :} ••, x:31. •• _ ••' ....1. tl:., i:) 1. .. .. ,:} M ..} ,.Y sr ,:} 25 i j20 26 21 :1.1,59:1.1 12/ 19/94 6 0950 ItIY#: *R F'1.4 »:I:t: }1••I:l:l ;IG i:01v1Pt)tNY :1:1%1 { :; F :'(.)FcL..:CS>1- •!:l:lIt • -. .,,.;,: E/t " " „27 27 t.. ,. N 0 .r ,.} JC.. M p 00 28 22 29 3 :!. ,:{ :L ' 1.2/1.9/94 680600 t: lt::1'0F:'l.J1%3 COAR l A% -1 CAR WA(Z 31••11:: {:3 190..00 #7 311 24 ..AR 1l.1AS IE 15 00 32 T._ 25 - - I'4 .7 ...,:Y .. , J .1.1..r:... 50 33 2` 34 ' 27 :1. 12/1 AF• 691.301 O s : C3hl F RAI ,:YS'=tl.. 8 ., I NC ,. C)l: E:N SPACE S :I:'T'f':' A 1» RA ISAL..,.} 4 ., 8 00 4. 0300 .. 00 36 y _._ 37 1. ;:91.4 1.:y./ 1.9 /cart c 91. #.300 {:3;:YWAL..1) !••It:l{ 1 =: ADAF"T'1::AR -y F:•F+ 007%FA11 1:i1.1F:'I- `1 ... :1:1.x: { 960.63 9160 ,. 6 i 3e 39 30 40 31 't - rir .1: '1:i'T -_`_x - -F:`.. ., :a E. .. - :f.TL ..•Y ...i':T:.} •s ... .:. an'.l.., . 41 X 4 32 :I:1•%I PEA 'TICK" :I: t:3{*I F t:11= :1.:!. / {. / .:y (;t :!. , # :3 a2 i 33 .I.1tiI::: F: l:: Co TI . t.31t 3 !•" t:J R 11 . / " .::I. 2 /6 15 01 .. C 4 ., ; :!.:1. ,. f:f 3 4 34 45 1',5916 1.2/1.9 /car 7 08 F'AF:'1 :KR 1,IfF' E- 1 »IC31A]AE C'Fti { 1.11 °'F'1. »:i:l : :: {a # :3 „ ' i n6 3'i 1••'!•;Clt:,.l••i F••l::.F. {:} '•7 .• 50 47 ' 36 48 37 rH0GI4 - ,31.Fo'1' -!. E.":) - a .:Y . 111 - E! 49 38 51yr . y . «t •, -. -i t•, r•y r} t:• r ' ' rwr 3 :L .t x :L r :!. ../ : #./5 7 :1. 0669 F l:::I•s,:3t: ?!tl!'`I! ":I... J(:.C :L,.} :I: i:llI ,, „ ,sz :Yr F. , :C C., ::,:} }::I',t:l:~` `T: r :I: hl . , ,:. H J. ... ,. t , ,t.. ; :L:. .. , , 40 53 1'59:1.8 1.2/1.9/94 7:1.2 1.1.5 F• OL..1!•i t.r1..1l : ::,l.t:ll...l: ::T' t:){ :t:l ls {:::f' :I: F & IYI :1: IlT' /'ti11:::1""t :t: t:rl...l«. 2 ., 1. 7 rx2 ..:1.1 54 55 42 56 t t 1.1 :1. :L 7'1.. . 5 +`FZ0F't" .tics :1. t:C AI... 's ... r:V„7 - T. - OFTIE.1•`TT _____ .- ... -.. -. ... `- EW"TI '`'F''F -MIE- . .. .: N ..» -- 2;1 2 50., 00 57 44 ,.. . 7 , . •:Y • :•, r . , ., . ., ... _ SYST ANALYSIS ..y 1 f 58 45 .!. , '.c.. 1 .2 / : 1 .9 / 94 C...L ,.Y +f .L 1 I ,t:1C !'sl ...,.Y, .r. rl... c..c.II,.YI.iI...'T :I. ILIt l::.llt : - 11r CONSULTING FEES WATERS _ :!.0 . ,:} 1 v 0 , :1. 0 , J. 3 .I. ..: (59 60 46 1 '• 61 1' ;y ;y • }' P •, . . . '. 547 . 25 i.• 7 I r . y 1:' I471. 5921 :1. ;2 ,,;: }tf 0 != 1.1M AND METER 1%31:::F,'l E CeE ,, INC' FZI ::F=AIR & ITIA : I : :t:It.1:C F* !'rll:: NT 5 .• 2 %5 6z 63 48 64 49 + - Tro7, 2:'. 1.2/t?/ - - -- {:3 . I T :Y``tT' "I ---- - - - - -. _ `- 1.M1- `I...61.I::.: 1:: PUIs!sol!I:.141` - _ _ _ -_. _.- _- ,Y.,.I.65 50 { :31.fF'F'l..:l: r ::.: 1 : ::t:xt.l:i: F'I'll : ::i 39.90 } y „ 71 66 67 51 T'ty (j''ij -,• 6'3 r. ?..r_ 1. 2/ 1.9/ 74 - f J'ar'kr I 'd 1 ti.JR.1 1 Nl:) {'s 1 ti:11.1t 1' I....I. i.:.+:..__ , 6J _ .._._ _ - - 691 53 F:'! :t.3t:i! : 1!'r! :I. ,. , f } r; .. 6 70 71 54 72 55 1: ,. 3 c:.'r •! MEii ~1':T. Tom.. Ti. »?`!7l'• t °CIT ,1:: .TTf1.1 - .} : } .} ...: . 73 i 74 57 1. 25 :1. 1 9 /5Jy1'I 76:1.30 I t :3i1)F1U 1111 ":R P1 t KUF ..a °' , 00 36.0 75 .. I. `:` '' ' :I ./ :i. `.' /{ I f't :3 y,:} f CMT 01: ' :I: t 1 : :: F I t:3I 1:1t::'T',:3 :i: lilt::.. ,:31.If'F : 3:1 :: : 3 .... t:l! °i :l: ( -% 19. 38 c'. 1 t r ., t .., i .,. t ... ;. r .., ,... t....1. r r.. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 tl V0lX*,`pIARE'2 Ce*lTy 0F* IVIAF1L-Ew0QD F A C31 1: E 9 31-2/09/94 1-0::,59 V0LJCFHE:R/GHECK RE 1%13 4 F*(JR FlE.R101) 1.2 5 7v0UCIlE- I:z t"T -_I f-:: C; K- C I'"' I Ii: C 1 Vl:::NI)C)I:Z VE]ADOIN 9 R1-41-JITIBETZ DATE.* NUIlDE.: D E: (13 C%Fk 1: AlICAMAT AMOUNT SUPPLIESS --- OF-F-10E'137.46 Ill f:3C`E:Ll ... ANEAXA,3)61.69 14 0FFJCr.:-42..23 3i !h or. -..(:%I:3 1 3 8 I I« 13) OFFXCE 1.7. 70 Ivill: A. j ... AlIET)US C40111101) I E:113*231,07 L..:1: : :.. .... OFF-1 (:-1::-226. 21 211 4.)5 i 221 231 c.7 F' L. -.1 E S .... C) F- F' I ME 20.. 87 tip , c , I ::. I . 1 ... 3: 1 : (:)I ... 3 - 1 :--713 52 1;'1 S ... ...8.05 CI F 2 8:1. 31; 1. 4 lti 4 ...3') a { I 261 7 70.... 27 SAJIFIFIL. 1: E*. %3 0FT710E 28 Jl 29 :1.5927 :1.2/t9/94 780402 OFT-10-4: F-RODUCTE) E % QU 1'1::'Iyll::l Q FT7 1 C %e E 2 5(3 5.. 70 30 C)FFl CE ' ; •709.. 51 31 OFTUCE 75.24 7. -41370.45 1 4j!331* 1.5928 :1. 19/94 780600 ISAM'S C%pt..LJB DlRECT & 40.00 40.00 441 34 4:A S 41351 :1. 5929 1.2/1.9/94 8-'.302'50 1%.%)(:)Kl<]:A MEASUR11,4C.3 l*3Y(%3TI:.:.Alvlv%3,l SMALL. T 001 ... IS 221. 52 22.1. 52 4 36 5 .1,5930 :1.ER37SPEAl... 1 SI. 4,ji3, 22 38 I:zI:*F"AlR & MAIA-TURADIC) 22.00 50; 39 RE.TIAIR & IvIAlI---IT/RADl0 11 7.A. 5 l 74..37 ,.', 40 I B 391. .6591.2/19/94 (340405 EVI* FALK..41' C I TY 0 F' 110 2i4i0 14 C 09321.2/1.9/94 840601. (Z31'.. FA1445 U I... F PRE )%:) IVII: Ill_*4EI*k*sI__IlF"-* 1. 8.1 00 ' j S t J.I1SjBl%:-) F"T TC NS MEMBIERSFIlf-c: 171.60 189.60 146 611 61-1Al '%5 9,35 1.2/19/94 840800 ST. FIAL)i RPINIS)EX •lll:*I)]:(:%F(-).i... •CENATIER 0C0%l* 94 %1.1) 1 . E ED%2 2 7 .1 71. 68 Q COMMUNITY CENTER SITE UTILITY WORK 2 B 2149 't.-INT"HOER (INC • '11 C* 0 IC*5 Si*,'-Y. 4 *1,2. /19 9 4 3 p X. 40 ISO 71. 5 9,"T.. 5 1.2/3.9/94 B 4,.515 *,*.57 %l3*TRA*f*LJl%.) FlI:F'AlRl%3 & lyl'f*l-,I('I::../I:_::QLJI'I::'Iyll:l-%I*T' 1. 9-` 4 00 1.,,93 4.00 1521 153 :1. lK25. 6 :1.'A*:" /J. 9 9 E3 50'% 6 5 RF::Fl.JIID .... Ce L A IS 00 39.00 54 S J. 5.. 00 1. 0055 .1....1s ,a A-'2%/19/94 f:3 r5 0 E 31 1%5 Own.AYI.EFL*41) UrDII-ILT1.1 ... E*D C LASC) 56 c, F ... C*E 37B.. E 7 -,57B.. •8759,'5 :I.2/V/-/9J*4 Bt* 51 '5 7''5 l%;3UFqF.l ... y of III C%f of c., 31 1 2 2 121 (1) 2'2`2., (Kv)1. 9 4 16 S 0 h!. PACAK 1 1.V:m9 F'OR - 12 t"CN ----- wursn nors wurmsn wm ` E: acn1:przow p4o—z99w--'U) 6 - -- - --- — -' '''' -- O I Is i I Is 22 31HE 23 T"ELIES-1-40NE'28. 53 83 67 129 if. 41 11,4 i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Mapleleaf Estates DATE: December 13, 1994 INTRODUCTION Aot:iou bz Counoil V bidorse Modified ...4 ReJ 11 ctedAYi- Aee.iRS!lljt Date On December 12, 1994, the City Council approved the following motions on the Map leleaf Estates project: 1. They changed the land use plan and zonin ma from R- l S (small slotsinledwellingpgg) and M -1 (light industrial) to R - (single dwellings). 2. They vacated the undeveloped street rights -of -way (Connor Avenue east of Cypress Street Meadow Lane, Brooks Avenue, the 16.5- foot -wide undeveloped public road and the west end of Gervais Avenue). 3. They tabled the other requests until December 19, 1994. The Council discussed the options for street access and decided on Cypress Street and another connection south or east of the plat. The Council requested that we revise the staff recommendations accordinglygY and put this on the December 19 consent agenda. 4. They requested a copy of the previous Gervais Avenue feasibility study. DISCUSSION The following recommendations approve the east half of the plat and table the balance until February 13, 1995. The recommendations allow the developer to plat a connection topp Gervai s Avenue if the City buys the west half of the site for open space. To plat the Gervais Avenuep connection, the City will have to vacate an existing water main easement. we will have to schedule a future hearing for this vacation. The developer has requested increased front setbacks on Lots 12 and 13, Block 5 to save a small wetland. I have added a recommendation below that approves these setbacks. RECOMMENDATION A. Approve the resolution on page 9. This resolution approves a cul -de -sac width variance for a cul -de -sac at the end of the existing Demont Avenue for the following easons •g • I. The variance would save part of a wetland. 2. The City Engineer stated that the cul -de -sac would be . large enough for snowggpg B. Approve following parts of the Mapleleaf Estates rel rnin plat (received b thep 'Y p Y City on July 26, 1994): Block 1; Block 2, Lots 1 -17; Block 3; Block 4, Lots 1-4 and Block 5 Lots 1 -7. If the City buys the west half of the lat for open space, the preliminary plat shall alppp p `y p so include the Cypress Street connection to Gervais Avenue as shown on the attached Exhibit A. Table the remaining parts of the lat until February 13 1995. Before the City 'P ary ty Council approves the final plat, a developer shall complete the follo wing onditions:g 1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Pay the City for the cost of traffic-control and street identification signs. d. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or dumpingpg e. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. f. Have NSP install street lights. The location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 2. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 3.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and. engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook. 2 b. The grading plan shall: 1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. 2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction will disturb. 3) Show sedimentation basins as required by the watershed board. c. The drainage plan shall show catch basins between Lots 5 and 10, Block 3 and dedicate necessary easements for these drains and p ip es. d. Provide storm water storage and/or an off -site outlet p ip e between Outlots A and B, based on a drainage stud done b the developer's engineer. The 'Y Y p g City Engineer shall approve the exact location, capacity and outlet for this storage. If the CitytY requires more pond capacity, the developer may have to drop lots. The lots shall meet the Shoreland requirements. e. Provide adequate storm water capacity for the wetlands on Lots 19 and 26, Block 2. The developer's engineer shall provide a drainage study to determine adequate capacity. The City Engineer shall approve the exact location, capacity and outlet for these. If the City requires more pond capacity, the developer may have to drop a lot(s). f. The tree plan shall show the size, species and location of any trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. g. The developer shall relocate the existing water line between Lots 7 and 8, Block 5 and abandon the remaining line. 4. Show the following changes on the final plat: a. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. b. Change Street C to Demont Avenue and change Street D to Adele Street. c. Drainage easements for drainage areas and wetlands that this project would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that will be south of Lot 19, Block 2. 3 d. Drop Lots 1, 2 or 3 from Block One or channel the drainage between Outlots A and B through a drainage pipe. e. Redesign the Demont Avenue /Cypress Street intersection to cul -de -sac Demont Avenue. f. If the developer sells the west half of the site to the City, he may extend Cypress Street to Gervais Avenue as shown on the attached Exhibit A. All lots must have at least 10,000 square feet above any drainage easement. 5. Show the wetland boundaries. on the final plat as approved by the Watershed District. 6.* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. These shall include: a. Give the City wetland easements over the wetlands. These easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet surrounding a wetland. The easement shall prohibit any building or structures within twenty feet of the wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from homeowners' fertilizer and to protect the wetland habitat from residential encroachment. b. Drainage easements for the off -site drainage areas and wetlands that this project would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that will be south of Lot 19, Block 2. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. C. Approve a setback of 99 feet for Lot 12, Block 5 and a setback of 71 feet for Lot 13, Block 5 as shown on the attached Exhibit A. These setbacks are needed to save the wetland on the front of these lots. p:sec9 /maplelfl.gwo Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Demont Avenue and Cpress Street Intersection Drawing 4. Cypress Connection to Gervais Avenue Drawing 5. Variance Resolution 4 Attachment 1 J • s i••. • 0 • ••• ••I .i .•• i • t Q •• •0 w O Kohlenon DO Cis• V°'k' 4 VOke 4b • 1 • o F • OJ .t' COUNTY L I PLA2A CM 2 ALVARADO OR PALU s sauc*eST on •. 4- s DEALMLL f DR • • CT. Pte' S MEMOM DO •' CONNOR Cdr CT.DE •.:::: F • w D S. 1p •• .. . ii•N i.. . Y •• PKWY 0 3 t• • • • • 3' y's • ' . • • . • •q • • VIKING DR. v b I Lake w W 4 0 LAURIE CT. z x oUR CT. 00 BURKE AV a v z EWRIDGE AV w O+ehin v Luke BELMONT AVE. W % SKI1 LMAN AV. GOWAM KENW OOD nL I 1. SUk4MR CT. 2. COUNTRWEV 3. DULUTH CT. 3 • J o 4. LYDIA ST BEAM o v IF COPE LARK CT. v o c KOHLWW AVE v L LEVWQ R0. c w ROAD JUNCTION C Z lC a evRFCE A% 1) CWIMBERS STD t 7. T LA ELDR 10 ii CT. BELtOKT 0 c SKILL E ' SKILL MW SHE N 1 R AVE. GERV S AVE. LOCATION MAP SITE 4 N IF COPE LARK CT. Q o CO.R0.v v L LEVWQ R0. c w o JUNCTION AVE. Uj Z a evRFCE A% 1) CWIMBERS STD t T LA ELDR 10 ii VE.BELtOKT 0 c SKILL E ' SKILL MW SHE N LOCATION MAP SITE 4 N r Attachment VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 7' flows 3D f Q t * *01T T&V fOt ( % Ak 70x W to, opew f00 ALA VOM t f. AM qns"Lw 14000 s0 . rT. R alowO p1 OKA • 1L000 SO R &WAQ r f`rc spjmw W. GNU rAwy Lon a 11 MA a 3166 Ams s30 4 GRAPHIC SCAM rr.. 0 SnaTS • AM r- AREA . If 16 AM$ •1 DEMONT .AVENUE.- InS in ow "LLM 4 IV 20NMG R I r v r - 3; 4 M 19U.4 2 s ui t+ IQMO M 0 10 X00 3 volow r S r 11 Sya f i IO.OH Q . srj a.sst.ra. 1w MMt 490P I 11• T .r+ \ . .i: Iw 1») • Wit•. i 10 t a I = u1swreoiw ) f4N0 S.f. tt.'Y ir. 10`000 S i^ S ui 1 \ \ ti S M' 1 Cr 7 7 t 11.241 S.. R d •_ I St a S KOU SY. ems. sr, art. / tt T 41 OWN • SEXTANT _AVENUE' , w •' 4 N.- > r ,. a t a p ], .t _ 1. t S i3 ` 11 y .. j 12" WATERMAIN AND EASEMENT .,,. ...n0 1 SC i r r t f+lMMOP n0 tHN w• 1 V w M _..• t C.00 - ...•. .... -'r-ow IM ww M M Vow 5 1 1 ' 11" 10 . .S r274v t . «....,,. ftw w.......__ 0.1. OERVAIS AVENUE tlfS S = r4 /W=T i'' LXCEp + r S w Airw .. s h 0 , 0 ' r r i• ' mow 4r rr i r.. art a M 4=W r r.. r.r.. mil• rr M •• 1 R • t t PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE M"TVL&O LE" ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT 00 colp"y w mvxum 7mmum ate 56M Lo M 1 -D Id E S T S U F,'V i.EN TEL No .612- 786 -`x208 Oct 3,94 15:39 No-Mic5 P .is14- Attachment 3 T " A" LEAF TES NMol 7 MIDWEST ,e .rEhC TEL No .De 2 • 94 1 1 : 1 1 t . (1 () 4 F' N t A t • . i1 wm 2 04 U 1 d N FT OD N Mme INA a M A N t A t • . i1 wm 2 04 U 1 d N FT OD N Mme INA a M Ise Attachment 5 VARIANCE RESOLUTION AREAS, Dennis Gonyea applied for a variance from the subdivision ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to the proposed cul -de -sac at the east end of Demont Avenue. WHEREAS, Section 30- 8(b)(3) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a right -of -way diameter of 120 feet for cul -de -sacs. WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a diameter of 100 feet. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of twenty feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: 1. On October 3, 1994, the Planning Comnmission recommended that the City Council approve this variance. 2. On October 24, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice . in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described variance for the following reasons: 1. The variance would save part of a wetland. 2. The City Engineer stated that the cul -de -sac would be large enough for snow plowing. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on December 19, 1994. 9 AGENDA NO. F-:-5 Aotion by Counoil Wdo e'd Modified AGENDA REPORT Rejected Dat e TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: AMBULANCE BILL - APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION June M. Baker) DATE: November 18, 1994 An application for cancellation of an ambulance bill has been received from June M. Baker. On July 12, 1994, she was transported to St. John's Hospital. The original bill was $458.40. Medicare paid $262.05. The remaining balance is $196.35 The application is attached for the Council's review. lz Attachment AUMCANCEL.AGN APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF PARAMEDIC AMBULANCE SERY.ICE CHARGES NAME OF APPL I CANT : L4 ./V t rIPlrlr• 1_ rrllr _Iri4rIr1rwlq ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: C I T Y STATE. lil -2/ ? I P : S`l PAT I ENT' S 'NAME: DATE OF SERVICE: AMOUNT of CHARGES REQUESTED TO BE CANCELLED: REASON FOR REQUEST -CHECK ONE: 1. Financial Hardship (fill out reverse side): 2. Other: I certify that the income information I have suppl on this application is true and accurate. I also certify that the amount of the charges requested to be cancelled are not covered by Medical assistance, worker's compensation, Medicare, health insurance or auto insurance. Si gneck-&a4,4 •_ 4 Date: //-Y/ INCO INCOME" means any amount received from the following sources by any Resident: Any Public Assistance, including but not limited to Welfare, AFDC, SSI, and Unemployment Compensation f' Pensions and Annuities, i nc? uL.1 gig PERA and Social Security Estate or Trust income Gain from the sale of property or securities VA Educational Grants Salaries, including commissions, bonuses, overtime pay and tips Intarest and Dividends Business Prof i t- -for 'sel f- employed individuals, including Farmers Payments received from properties being sold on Contracts for Deed List all resi dents of your household. Ncl ude yourse I f . Include their ages a,d their incomes (if any) : 1) Income 1 i sted shout d i ncl ude al 1 i ncone wni cl your househol d can reasonabl a expect to recei ve during the next 12 months. 2) "RESIDENT" means any person, other than a renter, living in the household for at least 9 months of the year, or a person who is claimed as a dependent for income tax purposes. NAME OF AGE OF INCOME OF RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT per month) r; bA t 6 r SOURCE OF INCOME including employer's address, if ap l'cable) t4 20 rob TOTAL INCOME: per month =..*k.. A' 3 R. per.year 14 I Olt CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 1830 E COUNTY ROAD 8 PHONE (612)770-4509 MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 TAX ID' 41-6008920 PATIENT NAME"- BAKER., JUNE PATIENT NUMB Ek"9411109 CAL.L NUMBER 407038 rn 1 REASON(S) DIZZINESS—VERTIGO DATE OF CALL."7/12/94 FOR HYPERTENSION TIME OF CALL-w TRANSPORT VIRUS CALLER4 UNKNOWN XFROM"PRIVATE RESIDENCE TO ST JOHNS SPHO902664ITALMEDICARE368A JUNE BAKER 1076 BELLECREST DR MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 DESCRIPTION OF CHARGE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE I ALS BASE RATE/RES ID ENT 1.00 $430.00 ALS MILEAGE 4.00 $7.10 TOTAL CHARGES THIS CALL DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT RECEIPT MEDICARE—PT ENDORSED 8995 TOTAL PAYMENTS THIS CALL PLEASE PAY THIS AMOUNT _> Y.,,• „x Mw VfN Mw MW .A,h• Y.,Y WN• ,V.\• MW fAV Nx wW •nN• YhY NW wx WN NA •h\V YfN f„V Mw \,•.\• MM W.v Yfx Y1nY XW YfN VV.Y YM N\\V MYf Yfx Wx Y.W AYN Yfx MW AYff Yfx XW •xN MW Mw vw Wx f.,Y •MV Nx W.A XW w.Y M\V vfx Mw Wx Wx MA MM f..v •nw ,XV Y.Y.• ffx wx x.V vfN w.Y M\v YfN MW YnY YNf vfx .,,, \ \,v DETACH ALONG ABOVE LINE AND RETURN STUB WITH YOUR PAYMENT PATIENT NAME'.' BAKER CALL NUMBERx-407038 rn 1 AMOUNT $ m xPATIENTNUMBERN9411109BILLINGDATE4 11/18/94 ENCLOSED FINAL OTICE. YOUR MEDICARE PAYMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED.1 READ THE ENCLOSED PINK INSERT FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS. THANK YOU. QUESTIONS, CALL. 770-4509. CITY OF MAPL,EWOOD 1830 E COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD Mt'%l 551.09 (612)770---4509 AMOUNT 430.00 28.40 458.40 PAYMENT DATE M 0 U N T 10/18/94 $262.05 262.05 AGENDA NO. 4*00 TO: FROM 0RE* DATE: Cit Mana AGENDA REPORT Finance Director l BUDGET TRANSFER FOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT December 12, 1994 IsAotionbXCo=oilai bdoIrs 11odified Re Date Overtime costs in the Accountin Division of the Finance Department are pro to be $ 1 ,500 above the amount bud This is because of the 'increased workload due, to the Communit Center operations. It is re that the Council approve a transfer of $1,50f3 from the General Fund contin account to finance the extra overtime costs and authorize the appropriate bud chan PAAGNVinot AGENDA NO. FmS- TO* FROM: RE• , DATE: Cit Mana AGENDA REPORT Finance Director lom4e9e' 0ActionbCounoil, Modified-- Rej sated Date A . FINANCIAL TRANSFER TO CLOSE IMPROVEMENT PRO 93 -14 December 12, 1994 On Februar 28th the Council re a proposal to improve Sterlin Street between Larpenteur and Hollowa On June 27th the Council decided to keep the street open and not improve it. Costs incurred for the preparation of the feasibilit report on the improvement of Sterlin Street, Pro 93-10, total $3,043.07. It is recommended that the Council approve a transfer of $3,043.07 from the General Fund to the fund for the pro and authorize the appropriate bud chan PAAGN\93-10 AGENDA NO. 4 Action by Counail : AGENDA REPORT Indoe 0 Dat® TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: INTERFUND TRANSFERS FOR UNASSESSED UTILITY E"ROVEMENTS DATE: December 12, 1994 Transfers are made annually from the Sewer Fund and Hydrant Charge Fund to the Debt Service Funds to amortize the cost of unassessed water and sewer improvements over the terms of the bonds that were issued to finance the improvements. When the tax levy for 1994 was adopted, reductions were made in the debt service tax levies for the anticipated transfers scheduled for 1994. Therefore, the following transfers are recommended 37,480 6,520 2,230 21 Hydrant Fund Hydrant Fund Sewer Fund Hydrant Fund Hydrant Fund 1977 Bonds (314) 1979 Bonds (316) 1979 Bonds (316) 1988 Bonds (318) 1990 Bonds (322) 112,300 lz FINANCE/TFERUTL.AGD F- 7 MEMORANDUM T0: City Manager FROM: City Clerk RE: BUDGET TRANSFER - SALARIES DATE: December 14, 1994' Action by Council. Data The change over to the new computer system for handling sewer billings has required several days of training for the Utility Billing person. Timing of the training necessitated her working some days in addition to her regularly scheduled hours and some overtime. Also, in order to cover her absence from the department, it was necessary for us to bring in a temporary for a total of 33 -1/4 hours. The cost of having the temporary was: $ 399.00 The cost to have the Utility Billing person in training (regular and overtime hours) was: $ 891.04 Total $1,290.04 A 1994 Budget transfer in the amount of $1,290.04 is requested to be made from the Contingency Account to Account 101 - 301 - 000 -4120 ($399.00) and Account 101 - 302 - 000 -4020 ($891.04) AGENDA NO. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Manager ;* ' 11_ RE: NON -UNION GENERAL WAGE INCREASE DATE: December 7, 1994 BACKGROUND All City employee general wage adjustments for 1995 are covered under multi -year contracts with the exception of the Metro Supervisors Association and the non -union employees. The contracts call for a 3.5% pay increase effective 1/1/95. Negotiations with the Metro Supervisors are in process. AGENDA REPORT Modified. - Dat The non -union positions include: City Manager Human Resource Director Assistant Fire Marshal Public Safety Director Public Works Director Emergency Mgmt. Director P/T Lifeguard Assistant City Manager Finance Director Parks & Rec Director Police Captains Community Dev. Director Asst. Emergency Mgmt. Director City Clerk Fire Marshal Exec. Secretary MIS Coordinators Athletic Coordinator Admin. Asst. - Police RECOMMENDATION Based on the settlements with the union employees, I recommend that the non -union employees receive a 3.5% general wage increase effective 1/1/95 except as noted below. No change to benefits is being recommended. The positions of regular part -time lifeguard and Administrative Assistant -- Police should not receive a 1995 adjustment as those salaries were just recently set with 1995 in mind. They will be included in any 1996 adjustment. F-7 AGENDA REPORT To City Manager Michael McGuire to of Public Safety Kenneth V. CollinsFrom . Directorrecr y ..- -- Subject: 3M Contract With City of St. Paul Fire Services Date: December 14, 1994 Introduction Aotion.'byj Gouncile; tj • Ybdif ied.... ... Re j eoted,_,. N NU Date 3M Company desires to continue its contract for fire services with the City of St. Paul. Background In July of 1994, 3M Company had concerns over daytime.response for fire services from the City of Maplewood contract fire departments. At that time, 3M entered into an agreement with the City of St. Paul for fire services. This agreement does not cover emergency medical services, first response for yemerenc medical services, fire prevention or investigation services nor doesemergency it cover hazardous The new contract is identical to the old one, with the exception of new dates and costs for services. Recommendation It is recommended that this be reviewed and approved by the City Council. Action Required Submit to the City Council for their review and handling. KVC:js Attachment AGREEMENT An agreement dated this by and between the City of Saint Paul, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of MinnesotaprPgg , hereinafter "CITY" and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereinafter "3M" and the Citygg of Maplewood, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter "MAPLEWOOD. " WHEREAS, the CITY has the facilities and staffing to provide fire protection to 3M to service 3M's Maplewood Campus, and WHEREAS, 3M has need of ancillary fire protection services for a limited duration gdurin a transition p gperiodofsecuring an established and primary fire protection service, now therefore IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties as follows: 1. That this agreement shall commence the date first above written and to be inserted by 3M's signatory and shall be in force and effect until January 1, 1996. 2. That the CITY will provide 3M with the following fire protection services: a) the normal response to any fire alarm shall be two (2) pumper trucks, one 1) ladder truck, one (1) heavy rescue truck or an additional pumper truck and a chief officer; b) in incidents where a 9 -1 -1 caller has confirmed there is a fire, the CITY will respond as provided in (a) above and one (1) additional pumper; c) in incidents where the 9 -1 -1 caller has confirmed that there is no fire, one 1) unit of fire apparatus will be dispatched for confirmation of the initial report; d) all of the responses for safety services such as emergency medical services EMS), first responses for EMS, fire preventions or investigation services and hazardous materials handling are not included in this agreement. 3. That MAPLEWOOD agrees for the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) to be paid by 3M to immediately transfer 9 -1 -1 calls to their emergency communications center from .31YI for fire protection services to the CITY's emergency communications centers via one button transfer. 4. That 3M will remit to the CITY a retainer or standby fee of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000) payable in six (6) equal installments on February 1, April 1, June 1, August 1, October 1, and December 1, 1995. This fee shall be in defrayment of the CITY's cost in supplying a twenty -four hour per day, seven day a week response capability. 5. That 3M will additionally remit to the CITY One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per hour or for any part of an hour for any CITY response to 3M for fire protection services regardless of the number or types of units the CITY deploys, but will not be charged for false alarms. Time shall be marked from the initial alarm request to the time of return to CITY quarters. The CITY will issue its invoice per incident which shall be paid by 3M in thirty days. 6. That if MAPLEWOOD contracts with the CITY for fire protection services to the east of the Saint Paul city limits, then in that event the 3M campus would be included therein and. this agreement will be void. 7. That 3M and the CITY will jointly conduct a 3M campus familiarization so that CITY fire staff may efficiently service the 3M campus. 8. That for the purposes of this agreement, the 3M campus or fire protection services area shall be: those Yroertiesof3Menclosedb McKnight Road on the west; Century AvenuepP on the east; Interstate 94 (Hudson Road on the south; and Minnehaha Avenue on the north. 10W.- Dated: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company AW BY: - - -- Its: City of Maplewood BY: Its: By: Its: 2 Approved As To Form: City of Saint Paul Paul F. McCloskey Assistant City Attorney Mayor Fire Chief Director - Department of Finance and Management Services 3 Agenda No. '' ' AGENDA REPORT Aotion ft Caunoil O: Mike McGuire, City Manager Date FROM. Sherrie Le, Human Resource Director RE: 1994 -5 PAY RATES FOR TEMPORARY AND PART -TIME EMPLOYEES NON - UNION) DATE: December 13, 1994 PROPOSAL It is proposed that the attached resolution be adopted to replace the existing resolution establishing pay rates for temporary, seasonal, and part time employees who work 14 hours or less per week. BACKGROUND It has been some time since we completely reviewed each title to determine what we need. The last change to this resolution was March, 1993 when a cost of living adjustment was added to each class. I asked the department heads who hire employees in this capacity to recommend the job classes they need now and in the foreseeable future. I also asked them to recommend pay ranges they felt were appropriate based on their hiring experience. As is the trend in the public sector, we have attempted to broadband similar titles into fewer classes for administrative ease. The resulting job classes and pay ranges should cover every situation that could arise. RECOMMENDATION Adoption of the attached resolution is recommended. tmc Attachment RESOLUTION WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, part - time employees who do not work more than 14 hours per week and temporary /seasonal employees who work in positions that do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year are not public employees and are therefore not eligible for membership in a public employee union. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following pay ranges and job classifications are hereby established for temporary /seasonal and part -time (14 hour or less) employees effective December 19, 1994. Recreation Instructor 5.00 -30.00 per hour Rink Attendant 5.00 -7.00 per hour Recreation Leader /Official 5.00 -20.00 per hour Accountant 8.00 -14.00 per hour Administrative Assistant 9.00 -15.00 per hour Secretary 8.50 -11.50 per hour Accounting Clerk 6.50 -12.00 per hour Clerk- Typist 7.50 -10.50 per hour Laborer 6.50 -9.00 per hour Engineering Aide 7.00 -10.00 per hour Building Maintenance Assistant/Attendant 5.50 -8.50 per hour Receptionist 7.50 -10.50 per hour Park Maintenance Assistant 6.00 -9.00 per hour Video Coordinator 9.00 -12.00 per hour Video Technician 8.50 -11.00 per hour Election Judge 6.25 per hour Election Precinct Chairman 6.50 per hour Intern I 6.00-9.00 per hour Intern II 9.00 -11.00 per hour Intern III 11.00 -14.00 per hour Customer Service Assistant 6.00 -8.00 per hour Child Care Provider 6.00 -7.50 per hour Custodian Maintenance Worker 8.00 -10.50 per hour Lifeguard 6.00 -10.00 per hour Water Safety Instructor (WSI)6.00 -8.00 per hour WSI &Head Lifeguard Differential 1.00 per hour Lifeguards or WSIs working as Head Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate within the above ranges. CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIA TION WHEREAS, Shelly Strauss became a member of the Human Relations Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota, in July 1993 and has served faithfully in that capacity; and WHEREAS, she has given her time and energy without compensation for the betterment of the City ofMaplewood; and WHEREAS, she has shown dedication to her duties and has contributed her leadership and effort fog the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and the citizens of the City, that Shelly Strauss is hereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for her service, and we wish her continued success in the future. Gary Bastian, Mayor Date Michael McGuire, City Manager 1 e CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIA TION WHEREAS, Pat Williamson became a member of the Human Relations Commission of Maplewood, Minnesota, in January of 1980 and has servedfaithfully in that capacity; and WHEREAS, she has given her time and energy without compensation for the betterment of the City ofMaplewood; and WHEREAS, she has shown dedication to her duties and has contributed her leadership and effort for the benefit of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, and the citizens of the City, that Pat Williamson is hereby extended our gratitude and appreciation for her service, and we wish her continued success in the future. Gary Bastian, Mayor Date Michael McGuire, City Manager G -1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Lot -Width variance and Lot Division LOCATION: 666 County Road B and 669 Eldridge Avenue DATE: December 8, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by coune i i : Ln se Xodfied: ._ Dati a The City and County Employees Credit Union is the fee owner of the property at 666 County Road B. They are requesting that the City approve: A lot -width variance for the neighboring property at 669 Eldridge Avenue. The City Code requires interior lots to be at least 75 feet wide at the building setback line. They are proposing to reduce the lot width from 120 feet to 60 feet by moving a side lot line. This requires a 15 -foot variance. 2. A lot division to move the property line between 666 County Road B and 669 Eldridge Avenue. They want to move this property line so it would go around the existing swimming pool, following the existing fence. Moving the property line would put the swimming pool on the property of 666 County Road B (the house that it goes with). (See the maps, pages 5 -7 and the statement on pages 8 -9.) BACKGROUND In October 1978, the City issued a building permit to James Shannon of 666 County Road B for a swimming pool. The Shannons owned both lots at 666 County Road B and 669 Eldridge Avenue. Their house was on 666 County Road B and 669 Eldridge Avenue was vacant. The Shannons built the pool on 669 Eldridge Avenue. On. February 13, 1981, the City issued a building permit for a new house on 669 Eldridge Avenue. In August 1981, the owners of the property at 666 County Road B (the Shannons) and the new owners of the property at 669 Eldridge Avenue (the Taylors) signed an easement agreement. This agreement gave the Shannons the right to use and maintain the swimming pool. However, this agreement did not give them ownership of the swimming pool. (Seethe agreement starting on page 10.) RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 15. This. resolution approves alot -width variance for the property at 669 Eldridge Avenue. The City should approve this variance because: 1. The problem is due to circumstances unique to the property that the current owner did not cause. 2. The variance would not alter the neighborhood character since it would not change the appearance of the lots. 3. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. B. Approve the lot division to move the property line between 666 County Road B and 669 Eldridge Avenue as shown on the map on page 7 of the staff report. This approval shall be subject to the owner recording the deeds for the lot division within one year, unless the City approves a time extension. 2 REFERENCE Site Description Existing lot sizes: 666 County Road B = 15,5 10 square feet 669 Eldridge Avenue = 13,585 square feet Proposed lot sizes: 666 County Road B = 19,038 square feet 669 Eldridge Avenue = 10,026 square feet Property owners: 666 County Road B is owned by the City and County Employees Credit Union 669 Eldridge Avenue is owned by Gregory and Kathy Carlson Zoning and Land Use Plan Designations R- 1(single dwellings) Variances State law requires that the City make two findings before granting a variance. 1. Strict enforcement of the City ordinances would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. Undue hardship means that: a. A person cannot put their property to a reasonable use under City ordinances. b. The problem is due to circumstances unique to the property that the owner did not cause. c. The variance would not alter the character of the area. Economic considerations alone are not an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the ordinance. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3 secl7 /666ctyb.gwo Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. 9 ^28 -94 Statement from Credit Union — Variance 5. 9 -28 -94 Statement from Credit Umton -Lot Split 6. Easement Agreement 7. Variance Resolution 4 Attachment 1 DEtvA W 0 BR KS LT 240O PK, w •• .• • • • • • • _ 1 • • • •.• • • O • • ViKitlC . DR. Kole - LARK AVE.w Lok• c LAUR I RD. iL.11 E CT. . 6 LEIAND 3 Z OC cr. O B RKE AV 1) CI'iAMRFR(; TtLDRIDCEAVE. o z E RIDGE AV v' • BELMONT LA W E1.tOtJT OVRSE0c. . c to AVE R G S K MR IL S K I LLMAN i SKILLMAN EAV. ILK4W0OD Y Sg aa. z 0 CO m WT. VERNON AV TRH o Eiiqr+ow w a o N Per#R OSE LAWN t 21 FROST V J 0 AVE. SEUWOODBELLWOOD c FE NTON. A 0 0 62 W SUMMER 0 0 t; o w. W CT. CQ U W DO W cc Y I % RIPLEY m z + a 3 t; O _ O,¢cn AVE. C RT10 F RIP LEY AVE. RE QQ` So PH JA CD KIN GSTON < AVE_ .i, """ Lrolc 2 AVE. oc W • PRICE f AYE, ' Lake W H Pf10MUc W a qL9AVE.0 LOCATION MAP 5 Q N COUNrY I PLAZA C'/t Q ar PALM G " 4 eacsr OfiAlvftlF pt CT. P' CV. v S O CONNpR CU . pCie . M DEtvA W 0 BR KS LT 240O PK, w •• .• • • • • • • _ 1 • • • •.• • • O • • ViKitlC . DR. Kole - LARK AVE.w Lok• c LAUR I RD. iL.11 E CT. . 6 LEIAND 3 Z OC cr. O B RKE AV 1) CI'iAMRFR(; TtLDRIDCEAVE. o z E RIDGE AV v' • BELMONT LA W E1.tOtJT OVRSE0c. . c to AVE R G S K MR IL S K I LLMAN i SKILLMAN EAV. ILK4W0OD Y Sg aa. z 0 CO m WT. VERNON AV TRH o Eiiqr+ow w a o N Per#R OSE LAWN t 21 FROST V J 0 AVE. SEUWOODBELLWOOD c FE NTON. A 0 0 62 W SUMMER 0 0 t; o w. W CT. CQ U W DO W cc Y I % RIPLEY m z + a 3 t; O _ O,¢cn AVE. C RT10 F RIP LEY AVE. RE QQ` So PH JA CD KIN GSTON < AVE_ .i, """ Lrolc 2 AVE. oc W • PRICE f AYE, ' Lake W H Pf10MUc W a qL9AVE.0 LOCATION MAP 5 Q N PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Re MN Attachment 3 EXAM ON CW Q OREIIMAN t1/1HEtlpG • 1M yO si. ENa/ M/ESOTA iM01(t101 Tit 42 W,9QM01MfENtO:yifEM , IZO! NMI. ITN sT_ Come ilAw`. IIE'i0a NTM (2/i) ifML3K AND FL, C3 L#A& Nwo tulnV &4 1 . PWA- MI a 12) "a- u+stN 4610) 047 rrr •.. •• rf • v I M•wt. •f wara .. ,,.„- •- --,.. w ... -. - -- s(p1wvN ice: sMT «w r c..rN t is M s••• " COWTV ROAD e w 1 A LOT it • 1 ''•• TIIACT A o 0 % : AS ro ,yam V, "AST.EXISTING RTY LINEPROPE JOT a E ,O R i i 'tz' itt -• tom' PROPOSED LOT LINE ' t DoT 14 ; E " b r•..... "go .r v...............*.....n.o.,.e ow we u• •wr,• o•. •tee• rrwM.•r am* •w•400010 , M A ow. r.rr•• "fM omwwv UlMr M -..wM L. iJS'J1r1R4wwooo1iroop"o•r yg . 40000 - SITE PLAN Attachment 4 CITY &COUNTY EMPLOYEES. CREDIT UNION 144 E. 11th S7TEET 0 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • (612) 224 -4754 September 28, 1994 Cit and Count Emplo Credit Union is re a variance of Lot 13 for the followin reasons: 1. There is alread an existin easement a between the .owne -of Lot 12 and Lot 13. This easement was drafted in December 1980, and a cop of it is enclosed. As it exhibits, this a al,lows the owner of Lot 12 the ri to maintain and use the pool, but does not grant ownership. 2. The liabilit of the pool :rests with the owners of Lot 13, and the owners of Lot 13 wish to divest themselves of the liabilit The current owners of Lot 13 purchased the lot on September- 24, 1984 and were not aware of the situation until after the purchased the propert 3. The variance would not alter the essential character of the area. We are not establishin new construction, but rather we are dealin with a situation alread in . existence. Approval would not result in a ph chan to either site. 4. Th owners of both lots have reached an a for the t of Lot 1.2 should this variance be approved. a,ll Attachment 5 CITY &COUNTY EMPLOYES CREDIT UNION 144 E. l l fh STREET • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • (612) 224 -4754 September 28, 1994 City and County. Employees Credit Union is requesting a lot split between Lot 12 and Lod 13, Block 6S, Littler Third Addition. This request is based upon the following information: Lots 12 and 13 were once owned by James and Mildred Shannon. City and County Employees Credit Union has held various mortgages on Lot 12 dating back to February 17, 1958. Lot 13 was purchased by the Shannons on August 26, 1970. The Shannons then sold Lot 13 in December of 1980. The Shannons were at that time granted an easement for the pool, which they had built behind their home, at an earlier date. Lot 13 was purchased by the current owners on September 24, 1984. These owners Were unaware of the. easement until they attempted to sell the property. Prior to that, they had no idea that they in fact owned the area where the Shanons had built their pool. The requested lot split is essential to the character of each property. It involves no physical change to either property, and simply provides a means for both parties to sell their respective properties. 1 Ill !! 1 P. . • - LO tai c Et.j, + EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREE!! made as of this 8th day of December, 1980, by and between Bradley S. Taylor and Teri C. Taylor, husband and wife, of 1564 Edgerton,, City of St. Paul, County of Ramsey, State C of xinnesota, parties of the first part, and James J. Shannon and Mildred E. Shannon, husband and wife, of 666 East County Road e, City of "aplewcNi. County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, parties F Rio eze —owl pAr, W7TNFr:RRT11 T11ATt W11tREAS, parties of th first part are owners of the follow -• irl'i r1or.rrihc?r1 r- arr-A1 of land lying an4l h%?1nq in the County of r Ramsey, State of Minnesota, described as follows, to -wit: S v, Lot 13, 81nck 5, Littles Third Addition, r-, 0 and WHEREAS par ties of the second part are owners of the follow- ing described parcel of land lying and being in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota described as follows, to -wit: Lot '2, Block 5, Littles Third Addition, and WH,ER?AS, is is the intention of the parties hereto to create an easement of tee - ing the above premises for the purpose of access to and maintenance of a swimming pool. NQW THERE: IT IS HEREBY AGREED: Tha: the parties hereto, in consideration of the sum of One j Dollar (51.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is heresy acknowledged, do hereby agree as follows: 1. That parties of the first part hereby grant unto parties of the second part, their heirs, successors and assigns a perma- rent easement for the access to and maintenance of the swimming pool ccnstructe-! on the following described parcel of land lying and being in tae- County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, described as follows, to-wit: i i• I NO DELINQUENT TAXES AND TRANSFER FJO = AUG 21198k •'. LOU WKENN DINS s 10 505.40 A 1Ri , _J• CIA/ . MA . That part of Lot 13, Block 5, Littles Third Addition, lying Westerly and Northerly of the following descri lines: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 131 thence S 72'49'2.8' W along the Northwesterly line of said Lot 13 a distance of 64 feet to the point of be- ginning of the lines to be herein described) thence S 0'10'32' E 58 feet; thence S 59'36 W 41.06 feet; more or less, to a point on the curved Southwesterly line of said. Lot 13, said point being 75 feet, as measured along said curve, Northwesterly of the most Southerly corner of said Lot 13, and there terminating. 2. Any liability of the parties for personal injury to any workmen* employed to make repairs under this agreertient, or to third persons, as well as any liability of the parties for damage to the property of any such workmen, or of any third. person, as a result of or arisinq out of use and maintenance of the swimming pool t .. nhaI ] he- ar-Stimed by the fart ion of the a -Pcond part. 1 3. In the event that property taxes are higher on premises owned b parties of the firstyp part as a result of the swimming f - vool than they would be without such pool, parties of the second pant agree to pay the excess, upon 10 days notice in wricinq to parties of the first part. 4. That this easement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties of the second part, their guests and invitees, their heirs and assigns. 5. Parties of the second part, for themselves, their heirs, and assigns, covenant with parties of the first part, their heirs, and assigns, that parties of the second part, from time to time, and at a:l times hereafter, at their awn cost and expense, will repair and maintain, in a proper, substantial, and workmanlike manner, the above - described swimming pool, and the premises des- cribed in paragraph 1 above. 6. Tnis grant of Easement shall run with the land and shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties here- to, their heirs, successors, or assigns, r n r. r1T •!'ti ~.•'r I - R + ate. , • •• d -.' .. • ~' • a °. ; ' ` J . -. •. t. •7 •. ,' .r "• . rT , _.. -- t ". 0. _ • !a f . - •t yi.iN •. ^ • r ,.. ,fr i••• r • •!' t • •r I4 ,rj •i •dt 1 > . t'., __ •YF :• ..a. j. 'S - f' +r• a. P .: ..'• r _ 1 , '' n I • } a ' 'M i v . . Ya. r f . • r t r • ,} : v w t ` = •r y . .. . /fi , e 't • _ • ! a , - ` _ _ rte - +. = :. . • . '. _.^ - e t1 . • •i • '.• 4 .. .. r . a.• ` r `L .a a . J • . t „ 7, Delivery of any notice provided for herein shall be deemed complete if and when deposited in the United States mails, postage prepaid and addressed to owners at their above mentioned addresses, or when delivered personally to owners. IN. WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the day and year firat above written. 7 Bradley Tayl Teri C. Taylox Jams . Sha. n 1, Mildred E. Shannon STATE OF M &N ',:ESOTA ) ss. COUNT OF RAMSEY ) On this 8th day of December, 1980, before me, a .Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared BRADLEY S. TAYLOR and TERI C. TAYLOR, husband and wife, to me known to be the per — sons described in, and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. O r .. _w• j • try Pub('c) 12 1 t s r' 13 w • t 1 ^ yr— ..". t t A L a r v bb, M r r AP STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. i COUNTY OF - RAMSEY ) On this 8th day of December,1980, before me, a Notary Public', 'within and for said County,personally appeared JA.KES J. SHANNON and MILDRE:, E. SHANNON, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in, and who executed the foregoing n- st.rument and acknowledged that they executed the same as their 1 free act and deed. N6 , tary P tic) l t, This Instrument Drafted B. :Y 1 Ernest E, Cutting t Attorney At Law 1240 Northwestern Bank Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 551C1 r' 13 w • t 1 ^ yr— ..". t t A L a r v bb, M r r o - grip fti Ar 41 gn O oo 9 c M .coo z Z , y , X 9 b CA m 0 0 z ... U) 14 VARIANCE RESOLUTION Attachment 7 WHEREAS, the City and County Employees Credit Union applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance. WHEREAS, this variance applies to the property at 669 Eldridge Avenue. The legal description is: Lot 13, Block 5, Little's Third Addition WHEREAS, Section 36 -69 of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet at the building setback dine for single dwellings. WBEREAS, the applicant is proposing to move a property line to make the lot 60 feet wide at the building setback line. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 15 feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: l . On December 5, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council this variance. 2., On December 19, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice I in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports. and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: l . The problem is due to circumstances unique to the property that the current owner did not cause. 2. The variance would not alter the neighborhood character since it would not change the appearance of the lots. 3. The variance is in keeping With the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1994. 15 Planning Commission -6- Minutes of 12 -05.94 idge, Sandell The mutien-r.Tse . VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Lot -Width Variance and Lot Division: 666 Co. Rd B & 669 Eldridge Avenue Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and answered questionspq from the Commission. Sheldon Sanborn, of the City and County Employees Credit Union, gave background on the property. Commissioner Rossbach felt it was inappropriate to alter the property lines of the lots to accommodate a sw mn in pool.gp Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which approves alot -width variance for the property at 669 Eldridge Avenue.. The City should approve this variance because: 1. The problem is due to circumstances unique to the property that the current owner did not cause. 2. The variance would not alter the neighborhood character since it would not change the appearance of the lots. 3. The variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. B. Approval of the lot division to move the property line between 666 County Road B and 669 Eldridge Avenue according to the recommendation of the staff report dated December 1, 1994. This approval shall be subject to the owner recording the deeds for the lot division within one year, unless the City approvesroves a time extension. Commissioner Martin seconded. Ayes— Axdahl, Frost, Kittridge, Martin, Pearson, Sandell, Sigmundik, Thompson Nays— Kopesky, Rossbach Abstention— Fischer The motion passed. H -/ MEMORANDUM To: Michael A. McGuire I From: Bruce K. Anderson, D Subj : Maplewood In Motion Date: December 8, 1994 AaU= by Council Or r o i d Rej ected -- Data Introduction The Maplewood Parks & Recreation Department coordinates the production and printing of the twelve Maplewood In Motion issues. Formal bid specifications were prepared and sealed bids were received on Thursday, December 8, at 10:00 a.m. Three firms bid with Nystrom Publish- ing being the low responsible bidder at a bid cost of $41,387.90. Background The Maplewood In Motion is the city's main communication with city residents to discuss issues and events. With the advent of the Maplewood Community Center, it has been determined that the Maplewood In Motion is not as effective a means to communicate recreation ro rams andpg Community Center offerings. The bid proposal for 1995 was structured to be bid at a total number of pages, which would pro- vide greater flexibility for our department to increase the size of Maplewood In Motion to reflect seasonal program offerings. It is our intent to still print twelve Maplewood In Motions but four of the issues (Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter) would be larger to reflect the seasonal program offerings. It is our intent to have the Maplewood In Motion remain visually the same, but the Parks and Recreation brochure would have a different look and a separate cover within the same publica- tion. I have enclosed examples of how other communities have utilized a combined Parks and Recreation and city newsletter brochure. Our department has also retained a desktop publisher as a temporary employee, rather than con- tracting this service out. This will be more cost effective, as well as rovide greater continuitypgY with the preparation of not only Maplewood In Motion but also other city publications. Recommendation I recommend that the City Council award the 1995 Maplewood In Motion rintin to NystrompgY in the amount of $41,387.90 as the low responsible bidder. s 4. Quote Price: Bid Bond Attached 5. Quote Price: Bid Bond Attached fitness pccln.e aJ Staff Date 1v • t Time F CITY OF MAPLEWOOD Sealed bids will be received at Maplewood City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 5 5109, until 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 8, 1994, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud for the furnishing of the following: The printing and publishing of the monthly newsletter for the City of Maplewood. Specifications may be obtained from the Parks and Recreation Department, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota. 55109, or by calling the Parks and Recreation Department at 770-4570. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by a bid bond naming the City of Maplewood as obligee or a certified check or cashier's check, payable to the City Treasurer of the City of Maplewood, in the amount of five percent (5 %0) of the . total bid price, which shall be forfeited to the City of Maplewood in the event the bidder fails to enter into a contract within 30 days of award by the City Council. The City Council reserves the right to retain the deposits of the bidders for a time period not to .exceed 60 days after the date and time set for the opening of bids. No bid will be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days after the date and time set for the opening of bids. Payment for the work will be by check. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids, or portions thereof, to waive irregularities and informalities therein, and further reserves the right to award the contract in the best interest of the City at its sole discretion. PRINTING SPECIFICATION CITY OF MAPLEWOOD NEWSLETTER GENERAL These specifications are for printing the City of Maplewood's newsletter, "Maplewood In Motion," using Desktop Publishing. The quantity to be printed . each month is 13,800. The newsletters are produced every month. The prices quoted herein must be valid for newsletter production twelve times per year. All prices set forth on the proposal page shall be considered fixed for a one -year period. The newsletter will be published monthly and consist of 288 pages per year. All bids shall be based upon the cost per page with one color ink (black) for text. The cover shall include two colors (black and one pms). DESKTOP PUBLISHING The City will provide a formatted floppy diskette containing the newsletter booklet pages which will be formatted using desktop publishing software. PRINT VENDOR Because timeliness of production is essential and face -to -face contact between the printer and City staff is required to accommodate last minute changes, bids will only be considered from printers whose production and administrative facilities are located within a 45 -mile radius of the City of Maplewood City Hall. To ensure consistency in production quality, the same printing firm shall be responsible for all printing work under this contract unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City of Maplewood. PRODUCTION/PROOFS The City requires laser printer quality page .proofs which are to be made from the disk the City will provide the printer. A silverprint will also be required prior to printing. The FINAL output of the newsletter must be from a Linotronic or equivalent. Laser quality output is not acceptable. SIZE The newsletter page size is 8.5" X 11 ". PAPER STOCK The newsletter will be printed on 60# base weight, white stock, Springhill offset, vellum finish recycled). If the printer substitutes a comparable paper, it must be a recycled paper and a sample must be provided with the bid. INK Two colors of ink will be used with each issue. The two colors will, black and one pms, apply only to the cover page. All text will be done in black. The second color on the cover page will be a standard pms color. STAPLING AND FOLDING Each newsletter shall be folded by the printer to a 8.5" X 11 " page size. The publication must be saddle- stitched by the printer. DELIVERY TIME The printer shall meet the following delivery times for each stage of production. Delivery means that the proofs should be at the Cily of Maplewood within the specified time frame. Receipt of disk providing City with page proofs: two working days for newsletter only. Any changes in page proofs required by City: one working day. Receipt of approved page proofs from City providing City with the silverprint: two working days for newsletter. Silverprint to delivery to post office: three working days for newsletter. Failure to delivery within any of the deadlines set forth above shall be cause for a 10- percent reduction in the price for that publication. Additional tardiness will result in termination of this contract at the City of Maplewood option. DELIVERY TO CITY HALL AND POST OFFICE The printer will appropriately bundle in carrier route pre -sort groups and deliver brochures to the St. Paul Post Office for mailing. Zip codes that would be covered will be 55109, 55117, and 55119. Delivery will only be to Maplewood residents in those three zip codes. A quantity of 200 newsletters shall be delivered to the City of Maplewood City Hall for each issue. HALFTONES The printer shall provide a cost per halftone. COPY CHANGES There shall be no additional charges at any time prior to the silverprint stage of production for minor changes m' copy or page layout. Minor changes include changes in dates, names, numbers, locations, minor editing or articles and blocking of headlines. OWNERSHIP OF PHOTOGRAPHS, ARTWORK AND NEGATIVES All photographs, artwork and negatives are the property of the City of Maplewood and are to be returned to the City of Maplewood, together with the 200 copies per issue. OTHER SERVICE The printer shall note other services which will be available within the bid price, I.E., artwork, design, proofreading, pickup. (Identify on bid sheet.) BILLING All billing for the handling and production of the newsletter must originate from the contracted firm only and must be submitted to the City of Maplewood, Parks and Recreation Department, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. REFERENCES Submit with bid the names of three organizations (preferably municipal), along with telephone numbers and contact people, for which your company has performed similar work within the past 18 months. Specifically not any companies for which you have created similar publications using desktop publishing. Also, provide at least three sample publications that you have created within the last two years and printed using desktop publishing. BID BOND Bids will only be considered if they are sealed and accompanied by a bidders bond naming the City of Maplewood as obligee, or a certified check or cashier's check, payable to the City Treasurer of the City of Maplewood, in the amount of five percent of the total bid price. The bond shall be forfeited to the City of Maplewood in the event that the bidder fails to enter into a contract within 30 days of the award by the City Council. CITY CONTACT Questions about the specification should be directed to Pauline Stapes, 779-3552. RECEIPT OF BIDS All sealed bids must be sent to: Pauline Stapes, City of Maplewood, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota 55109. Bid envelopes shall be clearly marked "Bid on Maplewood In Motion Newsletter." Sealed bids will be accepted until 10 a.m. on Thursday, December 8, 1994 at which time they will be opened and read aloud. EVALUATION OF BIDS Bids will be evaluated based upon: Compliance with specifications Cost Ability to use desktop publishing Cost of options /alternatives Experience working with municipalities on similar projects Availability of the specific type typefaces Location of printer Any other factors deemed important by the City of Maplewood MAPLEWOOD NEWSLETTER BID PROPOSAL FEBRUARY 1995 - JANUARY 1996 Company:I I Address: Phone: Fax Number: Description: 12 issues for 1995, monthly publication Paper Stock: 60# Springhill offset, white stock, vellum finish. Same color for all 12 issues. Trim Size: 8.5" x 11 it page size Fold/Bind: Fold and saddle- stitch on 11 ". Prepare for carrier route pre -sort and delivery to the St. Paul Post Office. No. of Pages: 288 per year Composition: Desktop publishing Presswork: Offset Ink: Black text and one standard pms on the cover page. Material Furnished by City: Formatted disk with hard copy Material Furnished by Printer: Negatives, plates, paper, printing, package Quantity & Price: 14po - $ - 288. pages per year Newsletter total cost for 12 issues Add'l charges: Stat Screen Reverse Halftones Bidder hereby agrees that per page costs quoted in each category above reflect all layout and printing costs associated with each format listed. To determine total cost per issue, the per page cost is multiplied by the number of pages to yield to total cost for production run of the total units stipulated. z 12--12 --1994 09: 612 450 2502 C I T ,f OF I GH P.07/08 AUTUMN 1994 NIEW111... UTILITY ... NSW: PAYMENT DROP BOX For your convenience the City of Inver Grove Heights has installed adrive -up Utility Payment Drop Box. It has been Installed with easy access from the window of your car. It is located In the pArklnti lot in front of the main entrance to City Hall, and is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The payment box Is weather proofed, secured, and made of heavy gauge steel. Raymente will be removed dally and credited to your account. Please attach your cheek, money order, or cashier's check to your payment stub. We strongly recommend that you do not deposit cash. Cash payments can be made at City Hall during the regular business hours of 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM, Monday thru Friday. Protect Your Possessions Keep your garage door closed and locked. If left open a police officer on patrol will have a letter sent to you telling the time and date your garage door was open. IGH EXPLORER Takes First Place at State -Wide Competition The Inver Grove Heights Police Explorers competed at the Mate -Wide Explorer Competition that was held last April at Breezy Point. f With over 100 runners competing, 1 / IGH Explorer Joel Krech tookp l first place In the two mile run with a time of 12 minutes and 2 seconds. Mr. Krech was awarded a trophy by the Inver Grove Heights Police Department. b ' cmir ar SUL RATE Route U.S. POSTA05 PAID PERMIT NU /24 I G H MN 55078 a 55077RESIDENT 21TY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 8150 Berbare Avenue Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 6 12) 460-2500 CITY COUNCIL I. Joseph Atkins ,. ..• ....... h•• May Georg'a Tou.rville +;::.:::....... Councilmember Bill Klein. ........ . :..'.. ; ..,.;;.. 1.. Cuncilrnerrber : t v.# Sheila Pokorny :::• :::::::........ Oouncilrnernber ,,;. Rory Schmidt . ,.Counchmember 1 il .]tn u i 1 ail d1Tf i ii,• 1.' 1t1 T. .III I',1 .. 0... 1 1.11 ,1 r '• w ` • t•. 1•, r. ' ', • .. ., ft'f .. Ily liiI ....1 1 . • 9• • i ?i • At 3r All ter .. CT<'• j•.'.•i1'... '.' ' c,/ f• ... . .. ' .. r t 1 1 i i ii 11t j' ' if • i ( 11' 'If( tf 11 : .u i i d i • i , l # 1, Trl 1i lii J i,j 111 , ' 1 ,Ul of lid 6A 1(ixi ibr l Illy) r 11U MU 7671 w P =WWO AL ef 1p411 Miri b r, t wr 16 ` w do o r. Ty11 fti...Al rl• it ., .,..• htwu ., . +,w 4 H ..r • ' ' /,+ lr 1A \ ' t i' ^ eY r f r • v r • . • 1 • w f w '/' 1 ,`• f j. 'N W . . • , • } A. r RN +'S,r / ' r ,:, 4 t i F a ,• 1 ' ,,a ' r ' • +l ` ' . , YI..A7 r \•7,•'•A•, ••• 1 a, d. •.M f•• • .J ire . .Pa .a,,,,AaJ• i i 1"' 1 i v• • 1 • b Ii M ri • n ..• .. rt.'.. • r : ", ,1 i 1 <'. w, :.. ' v 1' i4 , r 1 • ' . , 1 : . a 1 . •i .... , . , rM1 f •• n • ! t• .1'ta•rt!. 1 •fit' • • v• , 1 ,h {iY..wY ie Rr +, M! _ so b4•, r'li , ^ a • .,dr, •,i -' „ • ,i 1v • •.rs A , a 1 lift • 4 11 A, t r , Imo`. '• F . q• •' ''y O IV ,, _i, . • •. •V'gA.Iv t1r'd • _,IA• „•a/ N' ^Y11,• .• /• •, •, a 1 a 1 1994 S Recr Proqra' ' r,,'', 1 , • . , .. .,, v'•v' ; _,. , vf• ,'QAvP,•''`'4••F ' YR`•i •i, v7p. , .,• •p • , .• / 1 1 J To: Michael A» McGuirea Cit er From: Bruce K. Anderson of Parks & Recreation Subj: Carver Elementary School/Commun Center Date: December 13, 1994 For the December 19 1994, City Council Meeting Imroduction The city and School District #622 staff have been meeting with architects from AS.T.R. to finalize preliminary pleas to Viand the gymnasium space at Carver Elementary School. The architect firm has submitted two options for the city to consider for gymnasium pansion. Alternative No. 1 will provide an additional 3,400 square feet of gymnasium and storage space at a cost of $325,000. Alternative No. 2 would provide for as additional 5,900 square feet at a cost of $540,000. B..,&ckapund The Council has reviewed the status of the Carver Elementary School/Comjmun ty Center projct on two separate occasions. The City Council has two issues that need to be resolved. The first issue is the status of the Joint Powers Agreement, which has been submitted and-pre- pared under separate cover by the City Manager and the School District Superintendent. The second issue for City Council consideration is to determine which Alternate the City Coun- cil desires to pursue for sium expansion at Carver Element School. The city will benu'y ty responsible for the up front design costs for either option, whether or not they proceed with the project. The design costs for Alternate Al are ap ro )dmatel $24,000 and the designy costs for Alternate 2 are approximately $40,000. The city has allocated $250,000 from the Park Acquisition and Development Fund. There has been no discussion regarding where the additional monies would be funded for this ro ' ect.p Reeomm, endation I would recommend that the City Council provide direction to staff as to which Alternate should given the proposed financing for this project, with the understanding that the city will be respon- sible for the up front design costs for the chosen Alternate. I would recommend that the City Council pursue Alternate Al at an estimated cost of $325,000, due to financing limitations and other priorities within the Park Acquisition and Development Fund. M COOPERATIVE FACUTY USE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of Maplewood hereafter "City")--and the -- North St. Pa -ul /Maplewood /Oakdale School - District, - Independent - - -- - School District 622 (hereafter "School District "). WHEREAS, the School District intends to make certain physical improvements to Carver Elementary School (hereafter "Elementary School ") located within the City. WHEREAS, the City desires to provide recreational programs to its citizens using gymnasium- and locker room facilities within the Elementary School. WHEREAS, the usual and customary dimensions of gymnasiums located in the elementary schools in the School District are 40 feet by 60 feet; and WHEREAS, the School. District plans to construct a new gymnasium at Carver Elementary that will be 60 feet by 80 feet. WHEREAS, by this Agreement the parties desire to establish a framework whereby the City will contribute financially to enhancing the improvements to gymnasium and locker room facilities in the Elementary School in consideration of being granted certain rights to use of said facilities. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Size /Payment A. The School District will bid Add Option #1 of 3,600 square feet at an estimated cost of $325,000. B. The School District will bid Add Option #2 for an additional 2,400 square feet at an estimated cost of $215,000. C. Based on bids received, the City will determine which, if any, Option to accept. D. If the City accepts option(s), they agree to pay actual construction costs plus soil borings, plan review, building permit and inspection costs in the amount of $7,900. E. In addition, the City agrees to pay $23,493 ($39,042) for design /engineering fee (in the event that the City elects not to proceed with either option, this will be billed at 80 %). F. The School District agrees to give the City ongoing first priority use of the gymnasium and locker room facilities after school hours, weekends and during summer. G. The City's payment to the School District shall be due after the School District has completed payments to its contractors for the construction projects. The School District shall provide a statement to the City certifying that it has completed its payments to the contractor and payment shall be due within thirty (30) days following said statement. 2. Design of lmproveme nts At the time of the design of said gymnasium and locker room facilities, the City will be consulted regarding such designs and, before said designs are implemented, they shall be submitted to the City for approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. It is specifically contemplated that said designs shall provide for separate entrances, with building and street signage, adjacent office space and storage facilities to be used exclusively by the City, as well as common parking areas available to the City. 3. Use of Gymnasium and Locker Room Facilities A. The City shall be entitled to the exclusive use of the gymnasium and locker room facilities at the Elementary School at the times set forth in Paragraph B. below. 2 B. The City's exclusive use shall be: i) From 4:00 p.m. until midnight on days when school is in session; provided, however, no earlier than 15 minutes following dismissal. ii) From 7:00 a.m. until midnight on days when school is not in session. C. The City's exclusive use of the gymnasium and locker room facilities is subject to use by the School District for special events, as follows: i) A schedule of the dates of special events (e.g., holiday programs and concerts) shall be submitted to the City on or before August 1st preceding each school year. ii) The School District may designate a maximum of four dates for special events as a matter of right. The School District may request additional dates subject to the approval by the City which shall not be unreasonably withheld. iii) In the event the School District desires to modify such schedule during the school year, such modifications shall be submitted to the City for consideration at the earliest possible date. The City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. iv) It is understood by the parties that the School District will have use of the single gym for adventure connection from 4 to 6 p.m., Monday thru Friday, if requested; Star Lab, one gym for 3 three weeks; and Science Fair, one gym for three days. In no case should more than one gym be used by the School District. 4. Equipment and Office A. Appropriate office and equipment storage space for the exclusive and secured use of the City shall be provided adjacent to the gymnasium or locker room facilities. B. All nonfixture equipment used by the City in conjunction with its use of the gymnasium and locker room facilities shall be provided and maintained by the City. 5. Use of Other Areas A. Subject to availability, the City may use other areas of the Elementary School, such as cafeterias and kitchen facilities, during the times of its exclusive use of the gymnasium and locker room facilities. The City shall be responsible for supervision of persons using such other areas and following use shall clean the premises and return the premises in the same condition as found at. the commencement of its use. Any costs incurred by the School District arising out of the City's use other than utilities shall be billed by' the School District to the City and the City shall reimburse the School District for such costs. B. Scheduling for use of other areas shall be through an individual to be designated by the School District. Such use shall be subject to availability; provided, however, permission for use shall not be unreasonably withheld. 4 6. No. n- Cit.Use A. It is contemplated that the City may permit other civic and community groups to use the gymnasium and locker room facilities during its hours of exclusive use. Said use shall be for civic and community purposes and shall not involve fees in excess of those charged at the Maplewood Community Center. 7. Operating Costs. Expenses and Insurance A. All utilities (heating, air conditioning, electricity, water), including insurance, fire and extended coverage, security and routine maintenance costs shall be assumed by the School District during the first ten years beginning at the date the City first receives occupancy rights to the new facility. B. After the first ten years of this Agreement, the utility costs and expenses (listed above) shall be shared by the School District and the City, on a pro rata basis, based upon the rights of use by the respective parties. In the event that the parties are unable to reach agreement as to their respective obligations under this paragraph, either party may submit the matter for arbitration pursuant to the rules of the American Arbitration Association as hereinafter set forth. C. Non- routine maintenance involving the gymnasium and locker room facilities (e.g. vandalism, damage) not covered by insurance, shall be borne by the parties on a 50/50 basis, unless the non- routine k" maintenance is necessitated by an event caused by a party's use, in which event the party responsible shall assume the full cost of such non- routine maintenance.. D. Liabili . At all times during the term including any renewal term, the parties shall keep in full force and effect a policy or policies of liability insurance with respect to the premises described in this Agreement, with companies licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota. Each party shall name the other party as an additional named insured and shall provide adequate coverage under reasonable limits of liability of not less than the statutory limits for municipalities. E. Progeft Insurance City shall be responsible for obtaining insurance on its trade fixtures, equipment, supplies, fixtures, furnishings including furniture, carpeting, wall coverings, drapes, and other personal property owned by City and located upon the premises described in this Agreement. F. Waiver of Subrogation To the extent such waiver does not void or diminish the coverage under any policy, the parties hereby waive any rights each may have against the other on account of any loss or damage occasioned to either party, as the case may be, or their respective property, to the extent such loss or damage is covered by insurance. G. Certificates of Insurance A certificate issued by the insurance carrier for each policy of insurance required to be maintained hereunder shall be delivered to the other party on or before the commencement date no i hereof and thereafter, as to policy renewals, thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term of each such policy. Each of said certificates of insurance and each such policy of insurance required to be maintained by the parties hereunder shall expressly evidence insurance coverage as required by this Agreement, and shall contain an endorsement or provisions requiring not less than ten (10) days written notice to the City or the School District as applicable prior to the cancellation, diminution in the perils insured against, or reduction of the amount of coverage of the particular policy in question. 8. Sale of Elementary School A. In the event the School District desires to sell an Elementary School covered by this Agreement, it must first give the City the option to match any offer received, less the depreciated value of the City's investment in the Elementary School building. In the event that the School District determines to sell the building, the School District shall provide a copy of the purchase agreement to the City along with its letter offering the City the right to purchase the building pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the purchase agreement, except that the purchase price shall be reduced as set forth herein. The City shall have sixty (60) days following receipt of said notice to provide to the School District its unconditional election to purchase as set forth above. In the event that the City fails to provide notice within sixty 60) days, this option to purchase shall be null and void and of no further force and effect. 7 B. In the event the City does not exercise its purchase option, it shall be entitled to an amount equal to the depreciated value of its investment in the Elementary School building at the time of closing. C. The depreciated value of the City's investment shall be based upon a twenty-five (25) year straight -line depreciation. schedule. 9. Equitable Treatment It is understood by the parties that the payments made by the City are to be used to provide larger size and higher quality gymnasium and locker room improvements, office and storage space, and exclusive use provisions, all at no additional charge as outlined in this Agreement. The School District acknowledges the need to maintain equity in dealing with various municipalities in this matter. Accordingly, the School District affirms and represents that it is not presently engaged in any discussions nor does it contemplate entering into agreements with any other cities with substantially different terms than this Agreement. It is further recognized, however, that based upon legislative changes, changes in the needs of the School District and other unforeseeable circumstances, similar agreements in the future may encompass substantially different terms and conditions. 10. Arbitration Any disputes regarding compliance with or interpretation of this Agreement shall be resolved by good faith negotiations. Failing that, such disputes shall be resolved by final and binding arbitration between the parties utilizing the American Arbitration Association. Either party may petition the American Arbitration Association for arbitration according to its rules applicable at that time; provided, however, notwithstanding the rules of the American Arbitration. Association, such disputes shall be heard and decided by a single arbitrator. Fees for such arbitrations shall be shared equally by the parties and each party shall be responsible for its own costs. a 11. ,Term of Agreement This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for twenty-five (25) years following adoption, except the City shall have the right to terminate the Agreement by giving the School District ninety (90) days written notice of its intent to cancel the entire Agreement or with regard to any individual Elementary School covered by the Agreement. In the event of cancellation, the parties will be mutually relieved of any further obligations as set forth in this Agreement. The City may extend said Agreement for a period often (10) years pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein; provided, however, that the City provides notice of such extension to the School District no more than 24 months and no less than 18 months prior to the termination date of the initial 25 -year term. In the event notice is not given, said right to extend shall lapse and terminate and shall be of no further force and effect. 12. Notices. Any and all notices and demands by or from City to School District, or from School District to City, shall be in writing and shall be validly given or made if served either personally or if deposited in the United States mail, certified or registered, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. if such notice be served personally, service shall be conclusively deemed made at the time of such personal service. if such notice or demand be served by registered or certified mail in the manner herein provided, service shall be conclusively deemed made forty -eight (48) hours after the deposit thereof in the United States mail addressed to the party to whom such notice is to be given. 9 Any notice or demand to.City shall be addressed to City at: City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Any notice or demand to School District shall be addressed to School District at: Independent School District No. 622 2055 East Larpentur Avenue Maplewood, MN 55109 13. Entire Agreement . This Agreement represents the entire understanding and agreement between the parties hereto and this Agreement may not be altered, changed or amended, except by an instrument in writing, signed by all parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands on this day of CITY OF MAPLEWOOD By Mayor By City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 622 By Its Chair By Its Clerk 10 i MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Maplewood Townhouses DATE: December 13, 1994 Aotion b counoil kddi is On November 28, 1.994, the City Council tabled this project to address the issues raised at the hearing. The Council was particularly concerned about more parking and screening the property to the north. The developer has revised their site plan. (See the attached site plan.) They added enough parking spaces to exceed the Code requirement. They now have 77 spaces for 31 units or 2.5 spaces per unit. The Code requires 2:0 spaces per unit. I have also attached a supplemental report on traffic and noise and a letter from the property owner's attorney. p:sec l l /townhom l .gwo Attachments: 1. Site plop 2. Tra&,c and noise report 3. Letter from Geoffrey Jarpe 4. December S, 1994 staff report FLANDERS RD r MAPLEWOOD TOWNHOUSES i jZIrLIq SHELTER CORPORATION WINSOR /FARICY ARCHITECTS, INC.0 10 30 60 I\ NORTH 11th AVENUE 3iko Associates Technical Memorandum DATE: November 28, 1994 TO: Geof Olson, City of Maplewood Tom Ekstrand, City of Maplewood Garrett Carlson, Shelter Corporation FROM: William Smith, AICP RE: Maplewood Townhouse Project Traffic and Noise In response to comments raised by community members at the November 7 Planning Commission meeting, Biko Associates, Inc. conducted field studies on traffic conditions along Ariel Street north of 11 th Avenue and analyzed noise monitoring results from December 1990. This technical memorandum presents background information and results of additional traffic and noise analyses. Analysis conclusions are summarized on page 11. BACKGROUND Previous Traffic Study The traffic study for the Maplewood Townhouse Project (Biko Associates, Inc.; October, 1994) demonstrated that the STOP - controlled intersection at 11th Avenue and Ariel Street would meet operating standards, with the addition of the proposed 31 unit townhouse project and the proposed retail center. Table I that follows shows forecast intersection levels of service (LOS) under four development scenarios that were analyzed in the traffic study. As shown in the last column of Table 1, each of the critical turning movements at the 11 th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection was forecast to exhibit acceptable LOS. Minimum acceptable intersection operations are at LOS D. Despite results of the analysis, some of the Ariel Street residents commented that traffic volumes are so high at the 1 l th Avenue/Ariel Street intersection under the current condition that, rather than wait at the S'T'OP sign, they choose to use 13th Avenue if they want to travel east to McKnight Road. They also mentioned that when the 1 lth Avenue /Ariel Street intersection is busier than they like, they drive north on Ariel Street to County Road C if they want to access White Bear Avenue or Trunk Highway 36. TABLE 1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (LEVEL OF SERVICE) INTERSECTION 1994 Existing 1996 No Development 1996 Build Townhouse Project 1996 Build Townhouse Project and Retail Development wB Lefts A wB Lefts A wB Lefts A WB Lefts A EB Lefts A EB Lefts A EB Lefts A EB Lefts A NB Lefts D NB Lefts D NB Lefts D NB Lefts D 11 th Avenue /Ariel NB Thrus C NB Thrus C NB Thrus C NB Thrus D Street NB Rights A NB Rights A NB Rights A NB Rights A SB Lefts C SB Lefts D SB Lefts D SB Lefts D SB Thrus "C SB Thrus C SB Thrus C SB- Thrus D SB Rights A SB Ri A SB Rights A SB Rights A 1 l th Avenue /McKnight Road B B B B ource: BikO Associates, Inc.; Octi er 1994. Previous Noise Monitoring An additional concern of residents at the Planning Commission meeting was traffic- related noise. Specifically, residents -commented that the noise levels had increased since they first moved to the neighborhood. Noise is measured in decibels, which are counted on the logarithmic scale. Noise level standards have been established to assess short bursts of noise (x.10) as well a sustained drones (LSO). The L10 noise standard cannot be exceeded any longer than lU .percent of the time for cone -hour period (i.e., 6 minutes). The L30 noise standard cannot be exceeded any longer than 50 percent of the time fora one- hour period (i.e., 30 minutes). The L10 noise standard for residential land use is 65 decibels (dBA) for the daytime period (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM) and 55 dBA for the nighttime period (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). The L50 noise standard for residential land use is 60 dBA during the daytime and 50 dBA during the nighttime. In December .1990, the City of Maplewood conducted noise monitoring tests along 11 th Avenue, west of -the 11th Avenue /Ariel intersection. Figure 1 shows the approximate location of the City's noise monitor. Shown on Figures 2 and 3 are the L10 and L50 noise levels that were recorded in 1990. As indicated, slight L1O and L50 noise level violations occurred during the daytime and nighttime periods. The L10 violations on Figure Jare shown to occur between noon and 1:00 PM and between 10::00 and 11:00 PM. The L50 violations on Figure 3 are shown during the same time periods. 2 Shelter Corporation North Figure Approximate Location of City of Maplewood No MonitoringFrom December 1990 Biko . Assuci:ltes No scale Inc. L 65.0 60.0 w 5.5.0 r•r U W A 50.0 45.0 40.O N . L10 Noise Level L 10 Noise StandardQ d Figure 2ShelterCorporation Maplewood-11th Hourly L10 Noise Levels Biko Associates Source: Cit of Maplewood;lewood;Inc.. Y December 1990 w i t1NlMltMtl Elan #0 1111111111 11116110 (3 01,if I I a A 0% 1 0% A N . L10 Noise Level L 10 Noise StandardQd Figure 2ShelterCorporation Maplewood-11th Hourly L10 Noise Levels Biko Associates Source: Cit of Maplewood;lewood;Inc.. Y December 1990 w MA 65.0 60.0 t W 55.0 w V W A 50.0 45.0 40.0 8A .. v to . 11 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 mm(Dm L50 Noise Level L50 Noise Standard E Shm,cr corperatioa Figure 3 Maplewood"11th B iko Hourly L50 Noise. Levels Associates Source. City of Maplewood December 1990 ANALYSIS Traffis Analysis Analysis was conducted to determine what traffic impacts might occur along Ariel Street if, as some of the residents commented, traffic volumes were too high to permit turns from- occurring at the 11th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection. Twenty -four (24) hour tube counts taken on Thursday, November 17, 1994, on Ariel Street indicated an existing 24 hour volume of 963 vehicles; 483 northbound vehicles and 480 southbound vehicles. This daily volume is consistent with the design of residential streets. Typically, traffic volumes on residential streets do not grow as quickly or as much as they do on higher class streets. Therefore, application of the one percent growth per year growth rate that was used in Maplewood Townhouse Project traffic study is a conservative treatment. Based on the one percent per year growth rate, the 1996 forecast daily volumes on . Ariel Street would be: Daily, 983 Northbound, 493 Southbound, 494 This 1996 forecast daily volume is also consistent with the . design of a residential street. PM peak hour turning movements at the intersection of 13th Avenue /Ariel Street were counted on the same day the tube counts were taken. Table 2 shows the results of the counts. Application of the, one percent per year growth rate to these turning movements did not increase them beyond their current levels. Figure 4 illustrates 1996, forecast PM peak hour turning movements to and from the townhouse development, assuming they would be diverted to the 13th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection. Forecast PM peak hour turning movements shown on Figure 4 include the 1996 forecast turns from. Table 2 and 1996 forecast turns to /from the townhouses that were assigned to the 11th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection in the Maplewood Townhouse Project traffic study. Analysis of intersection operations that would occur with these turns resulted in the following: PM Peak Hour LOS at the 13th Avenue /Ariel Street Intersection: Westbound Left, LOS A Westbound Right, LOS A Southbound Left, LOS A Under this worst case condition where turns to /from the townhouses would be diverted to the 13th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection, northbound and southbound daily traffic volumes on Ariel Street would increase to the following: Daily, 1,233 Northbound, 618 Southbound, 615 6 TABLE 2 PM PEAK HOUR THING MOVEMENTS 13TH AVENUE /ARIEL STREET 1994 (EXISTING) AND 1996 (FORECAST) our e: Biko Associates, Inc.; November 17, 1994 This forecast, daily volume (1,233 vehicles per day) is within the range of volumes that can be accommodated by a two -lane street, such as Ariel Street, although average vehicular speed would be low. The range of residential street daily volumes has been observed to be between 400 to 1,200 vehicles per day, depending on the type of residential street. Ariel Streets northbound and southbound travel lanes, between 13th Avenue and Flanders Road, provide a total of 19 feet of pavement without arkin lanesAg or curb and gutter. Between Flanders Road and 11th Avenue, the width of the travel lanes on Ariel Street is 27.5 feet and there is a 9 foot -wide parking lane on the east side of the street. Therefore, if vehicles from the townhouse project could not use the 1 lth Avenue / Ariel Street intersection and were forced to divert to 13th Avenue / Ariel Street, the following would occur: The 13th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection would provide adequate capacity for the forecast intersection movements. Analysis showed this intersection currently operates at LOS A and would continue to do so under the worst case scenario. Ariel Street, between 11th and 13th Avenues would provide adequate capacity to accommodate forecast northbound and southbound daily traffic flows. Under the worst case scenario, the approximate hourly volume on Ariel Street would be 50 vehicles per lane during the PM P eak hour. This volume could be accommodated by the street, but would probably be noticeable as an intrusion to the residents. It should be mentioned again that all the turning movements at the 11th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection are forecast to Operate at LOS D or better in 1996 with the townhouse development and the retail development in place. Although the stop -delay time residents spend at the intersection waiting for opportunities to make their turns may seem excessive, the delays residents currently experience are within acceptable limits. Their perception that the 11 th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection does not operate efficiently could be based on two factors: 1) Comparisons of the current stop -delay time to what they experienced when they first moved to the neighborhood several years ago. 2) Reminders of an automobile accident that occurred at the intersection, when the STOP sign controlling southbound movements had been knocked down by one vehicle, and a second vehicle went through the intersection without stopping and was hit by a vehicle on 1 lth Avenue. r NORTH EAST APPROACH APPROACH SOUTH APPROACH WEST APPROACH Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left 1994 15 0 8 0 10 7 21 15 0 0 0 0 1996 15 0 8 0 10 7 21 15 0 0 0 0 our e: Biko Associates, Inc.; November 17, 1994 This forecast, daily volume (1,233 vehicles per day) is within the range of volumes that can be accommodated by a two -lane street, such as Ariel Street, although average vehicular speed would be low. The range of residential street daily volumes has been observed to be between 400 to 1,200 vehicles per day, depending on the type of residential street. Ariel Streets northbound and southbound travel lanes, between 13th Avenue and Flanders Road, provide a total of 19 feet of pavement without arkin lanesAg or curb and gutter. Between Flanders Road and 11th Avenue, the width of the travel lanes on Ariel Street is 27.5 feet and there is a 9 foot -wide parking lane on the east side of the street. Therefore, if vehicles from the townhouse project could not use the 1 lth Avenue / Ariel Street intersection and were forced to divert to 13th Avenue / Ariel Street, the following would occur: The 13th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection would provide adequate capacity for the forecast intersection movements. Analysis showed this intersection currently operates at LOS A and would continue to do so under the worst case scenario. Ariel Street, between 11th and 13th Avenues would provide adequate capacity to accommodate forecast northbound and southbound daily traffic flows. Under the worst case scenario, the approximate hourly volume on Ariel Street would be 50 vehicles per lane during the PM P eak hour. This volume could be accommodated by the street, but would probably be noticeable as an intrusion to the residents. It should be mentioned again that all the turning movements at the 11th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection are forecast to Operate at LOS D or better in 1996 with the townhouse development and the retail development in place. Although the stop -delay time residents spend at the intersection waiting for opportunities to make their turns may seem excessive, the delays residents currently experience are within acceptable limits. Their perception that the 11 th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection does not operate efficiently could be based on two factors: 1) Comparisons of the current stop -delay time to what they experienced when they first moved to the neighborhood several years ago. 2) Reminders of an automobile accident that occurred at the intersection, when the STOP sign controlling southbound movements had been knocked down by one vehicle, and a second vehicle went through the intersection without stopping and was hit by a vehicle on 1 lth Avenue. r 0 t o0 r M Figure 4 Sheller corporation NoAh PM Peak Stour Turning Movements With I3ik 11th Avenut/Ariel Street Townhouse Traffic MInc. Associates No Scale Diverted to 13th Avenue/Ariel Street 10 15 Noise Analysis Distance Doubling Based on the location of the City's noise monitor, approximately 80 feet from the centerline of 11th Avenue, the recorded noise levels describe conditions that would be experienced by a first row of houses fronting on 11th Avenue. Eloise levels that would reach existing residences that front on Ariel Street north of 11th Avenue, would be less than those the City recorded. Since the City's noise monitor was approximately 80 feet from the centerline of I I th Avenue, recorded noise levels would be reduced by 3 decibels with each doubling of the distance. Thus, a 65 dBA reading at 45 feet would be 62 dBA at 160 feet (80 feet x 2). Noise from line sources, like moving traffic, travels along line of sight. If constructed, the townhouses would block the line of sight between existing residences on Ariel Street and 11th Avenue. Because of this, they would shield existing residences on Ariel Street from traffic- generated noise on 11th Avenue. Human Hearing Capability and Noise Level Doubling or Halving It should be mentioned that the human ear is not capable of perceiving noise level changes that are less than 3 dBA. Because decibels are logarithmic expressions, they are added differently than numbers on the ordinal scale. For example, 65 dBA plus 65 dBA equals 68 dBA, and a doubling or a halving of sound from a noise source is required to produce a 3 decibel change. Therefore, the traffic volume along 1 I th. Avenue would have to be doubled or halved before a .change in the noise level could be p erceived by humans. The 1990 noise monitoring results on Figures .2 and 3, show there were slight violations of the L10 and L50 noise standards. Specifically, the results indicated the following: 0 0.1 dBA exceedance of the daytime L10 standard (65 dBA) 0 3.0 dBA exceedance of the nighttime L 10 standard (55 dBA) 2.0 dBA exceedance of the daytime L50 standard (60 dBA) 300 dBA exceedance of the nighttime L50 standard (50 dBA) The 1990 traffic volume along 11th Avenue, west of Ariel Street, was 8,950 vehicles per day, and the 1996 forecast traffic volume along l lth Avenue would have to be doubled (17,900 vehicles per day) before residents would be able to perceive any noise level increase from the traffic. As stated in the Maplewood Townhouse Project traffic study, the 1996 daily traffic volume on 11 th Avenue is forecast to be 11,700 vehicles per day, which is not high enough for a detectable change. Therefore, the addition of traffic to 1 lth Avenue (from a general increase in regional vehicle -miles of travel, the proposed retail project, and the proposed townhouse project) will only lead to modest increased noise levels. The expected noise increases will be less than 3 dBA, however, and should not be perceived by the residents. In its review of Indirect Source Permit (ISP) applications for proposed developments, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Mn /PCA) recognizes the minimum 3 dBA change in noise levels to determine if noise impacts are significant enough to require mitigation or denial of a permit. In cases where there 0 is an existing noise violation, the PCA will issue a permit for the development as long as traffic from the proposed development does not increase the noise level by 3 dBA or more. As presented, traffic from the proposed townhouse development will not result in 3 dBA noise level increases. 10 CONCLUSIONS This .technical memorandum has been prepared to address traffic and traffic- related noise concerns that were raised at the November 7 Planning Commission meeting where the Maplewood Townhouse Project was discussed. The traffic issues specifically dealt with a condition where east /west traffic along 11th Avenue would be so high that vehicles would not be able to use the 11th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection. Under this worst case scenario, additional traffic to the intersection (to /from the proposed townhouse project) would be diverted to the 13th Avenue /Ariel :Street intersection. The traffic- related noise issue involved a review of noise monitorin g results from December 1990. The monitoring was conducted by the City of Maplewood, on the north side of 11th Avenue and approximately 200 feet west of the 1 I th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection. Monitored noise levels at that time showed slight exceedances of the state's L10 and L50 daytime and nighttime noise standards. Traffic It should be stated that the traffic study for the Maplewood Townhouse Project found that under full development (proposed townhouse project and proposed retail project), the 11th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection would continue to operated acceptably with a STOP sin in 1996. Residents neverthelessg , have commented that the intersection does not operate efficiently. In response, it is the consultant's opinion that the current stop - delays at the intersection are robabl longer than the were when residentsPYgY first moved to the neighborhood, and what the residents perceive is an actual worsening of intersection operations. However, if when they moved to the neighborhood all turns at the intersection operated at LOS A. or LOS B, it may be difficult to understand that LOS D is the minimum acceptable standard forp intersection operations. Analysis -showed if traffic from the 1 I th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection were to be diverted to the 13th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection, all turning movements would operate at LOS A in 1996. The analysis also showed that existing Ariel Street, with its current cross - section, would accommodate the forecast traffic volume, but the average vehicular speed would be low and the volume of vehicles would probablY be viewed as an intrusion. Noise Studies have shown that a noise level increase that is less than 3 dBA is not detectable by humans. The analysis of traffic- related noise showed that the traffic volume on 11th Avenue would have to be increased from its 1990 level (8,950 vehicles per day) to 17,900 vehicles per day in 1996, before there would be any perceptible change in the noise levels that were monitored in 1990. The forecast 1996 daily traffic volume on 11th Avenue is 11,700 vehicles per day. Based on the forecast increase in daily traffic from 8,950 to 11,700, there will be an increase in the noise level that is generated by traffic on 11th Avenue. Because the source of the noise will not reach 17,900 vehicles per day, however, the noise level increase will not be perceptible to the human ear. I1 A • t Analysis also showed that construction of the townhouse project will"p .l _help to decrease noise levels from11thAvenuethataffectresidencesthatfronton11thAvenue. Noise from lines r 'sources like movingtraffic, .travels along lines of sight. The townhouses will block the fine of sight betweeneen l l th Avenue andexistingresidences. because of this, the townhouses themselves will act as a noisee barrier and will shieldtheresidencesfromtrafficnoiseon. l l th Avenue.. 12 Or MAUN&SBION PLC LAWRENCE J. HAYES"SAINT PAUL OFFICE J. PATRICK BRINKMANK JEROME B.SIMON RICHARD C.SALMEN JOHN C..JOHANNESON 2300 WORLD TRADE CENTER JOHN J. BOWDEN JAM W. BREHL-" BRUCE G.ODLAUG 30 EAST 7TH STREET STEVEN .E.RAU ALBERT A.WOODWARD SAINT PAUL,MINNESOTA SSIOI -4904 PHILIP T. COLTON TREVOR R,WALSTENGARRETTE. MULROONEY'TELEPHONE 612- 229 -2900 RUTH SILSETH MARCOTT WILLIAM J. HASSING"TELECOPIER 612 -229 -2800 JOHN R. LANDIS JAMES A.GALLAGHER MARK R.GLEEMAN CHARLES BANS BARRY A.GERSICK MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE LAURA J. DAVIS STEPHEN E.YOCH GEOFFREY P. JAR PC RICHARD . GAALSWYK 2900 NORWEST CENTER JENNIFER A.TENENBAUM M.GLADER LARRY B.GUTHRIE 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET TIMOTHY J. SAWINAT SETH M.COLTON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 -4133 HAROLD LEVANDER, JR.TELEPHONE 512 - 338 -1113 TELECOPIER 612- 338 -2271 OF COUNSEL JOSEPH M. NEMO ..JR. ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN RETIRED REPLY TO: • Paul MERLYN C.GREEN JOSEPH A. MAUN December 2, 1994 1909 -1991 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Maplewood Maplewood Municipal Building 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Maplewood Townhouses (11th Avenue and Aerial Street) Comprehensive Plan Change and Rezoning Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: We are attorneys for Hillcrest Development, which owns the above - referenced property. We have appeared before you in the past on various matters involving Hillcrest and its property. As you know, Shelter Corporation has entered into a purchase agreement with respect to a substantial portion of this property, contingent upon zoning of the property for residential multi family use, and issuance of building permits on that basis. We understand that the property is for the most part so designated under the comprehensive land use plan, and that rezoning of the property for such. use was recommended by city staff and overwhelmingly approved by the Maplewood Planning Commission. We further understand that, at the public hearing on this matter that was held on Monday, November 28, th matter was tabled until Monday, December 19, ostensibly to study parking .issues. We are reliably informed and believe that the proposed development for this tract complies with all applicable ordinances and standards, including parking requirements. Therefore, it was arbitrary and improper, and frankly a fabrication, to create this issue and delay approval. CELEBRATING OVER 30 YEARS OF LEGAL SERVICES MAUN&SWN,PLc The Honorable Mayor and City Council January 19, 1993 Page 2 Even more astonishing, however, was the stark contrast between the Shelter - Hillcrest hearing and the Maplewood Retail Addition hearing that immediately followed. There, the. requested land use plan change, zoning change, conditional use permits, street vacations, and associated hatters were expeditiously approved. There was no justification for the way H1411crest,, a longtime property owner and taxpayer in Maplewood, was treated compared to the developers of the property .immediately across the street. When Hil.lcrest has been mistreated in Maplewood in the past, it has had no alternative but to resort to available legal remedies. Regrettably, this may once again present such a situation. We hope that is not the case, and that you will grant the requested approvals on December 19. If you or your staff wish to discuss any aspect of this, Hillcrest Development will be available. Very truly, xirs G Iret' ; Jarpi GPJ : bb cc Mr. Geoffrey Olson Mr. Patrick J. Kelly Hi l lcrest Development 12/02/94,GPJ,60415_1S TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DAVE: MEMORANDUM City Manager Thomas Ekstcand, Associate Planner Comprehensive Plan Change and Rezoning Maplewood Townhouses Northwest Corner of 11th Avenue and Ariel Street Shelter Corporation December 5, 1994 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . • . . . • • • • • • . .. • • • . • . • . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Project Description ............ . ............. ............................. 2 Requests ........................ ............................... BACKGROUND................ ......................0.00.0... DISCUSSION ................ ............................ Comprehensive Plan Change and Rezoning ................... „ . , • , • , • .. 3 Densit Traffic .................. Noise.... . . . . . . . • • • . .. . •. • . • • • . . . • .. . . . ._ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . . • • • . • . • • . • . . . . . 4 Opposition to Rental Dwellings .......... • ... • ... • .. • • 6666 . CrimeIncrease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . , . . . • . . . • . . . • • • * • . . . . • . • • we • . . . . . 5 RECOMMENDATION . ...........................5 C -',NS' COMMENTS ................ . .................. .d w REFERENCE INFORMATION 6666. 6 9 . 0 0 . . . . . . , . • ... • ... • - . • . . STI'E DESCRIPTION ....................... ............................... 8 SURROUNDING LAND USES .... ............................... . PLANNING • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • s . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • V PUBLICSAFETY .......................... ............................... 9 INTRODUCTION Project Description The Shelter Corporation is proposing to build 31 rental town houses at the northwest corner of Eleventh Avenue and Ariel Street. (See the maps on pages 10 and 1 and the site plan on page 15.) There would be 16 two- bedroom and 15 three - bedroom units. (Seethe "Project Description" in the narrative on page 18.) Requests The Shelter Corporation is requesting the following: 1. A change in the City's land use plan from LBC (limited Business Commercial) to R -3H high- density multiple dwellings) along the l nth Avenue frontage. The City is already planning the north part of the site for R -3H. (See the existing and proposed maps on pages 11 and 12 and the written statement on page 18.) 2. A rezoning from F (farm residential) to R -3 (multiple dwellings). (See the existing and proposed maps on pages 13 and 14 and the written statement on pages 19 -21.) The developer will apply for the site and building design approval if the City approves the land use plan and zoning changes. BACKGROUND On January 7, 1991, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the land use plan and zoning on this property. This, hearing was part of a City -wide zoning and land use study. The Commission recommended that the City Council change the LBC designation on 11th Avenue to R -3(H). The Commission gave the following reasons: 1. An R -3M or R -3H classification will generally produce less traffic than an office use, especially since the Council reduced the maximum densities allowed for multiple dwellings. This is important because of the growing traffic congestion at the intersection of 11th and VvWte Bear Avenues. 2. Multiple dwellings may help the City meet regional housing goals. The City could particularly use modest -cost housing, such as town houses, small apartment buildings and double dwellings. 3. Multiple dwellings are a practical use for Hillcrest Development (the property owner). Multiple dwellings were recently built on the south side of 1 lth Avenue in North St. Paul. K, 4. The change would be consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The R-3(H) classification would allow the property to develop as one project. This would allow the City more flexibility in requiring designs that protect the homes on Ariel Street. On January 28, 1991, the City Council tabled the land use plan change until the City finished updating the comprehensive plan. DISCUSSION Comprehensive Plan Change and Rezoning The City does not require specific findings to change the land use plan. A land use plan change, however, should be consistent with the goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. (Seethe housing policies on pages 8-9.) The proposed development is consistent with these. The four findings for approval of a rezoning are in the resolution on page 44. The proposed rezoning meets these findings. Residents suggested that this property be used for open space, a small golf course, a park, single dwellings or owner- occupied town houses. The City's Open. Space Committee ranked this site 53 out of 67 sites. The City is not planning to buy this site for open space or park. The City Attorney had advised me that the City cannot deny a zoning I change because the units are rental versus owner - occupied. The only other option is to change the land use plan to single dwellings. However, the City has been planning the north part of this site for high density multiple dwellings since the City adopted its original land use plan in 1972. Amultiple- dwelling development on the south part of the site would be a logical extension ofthis classification. The City Attorney feels that "In light of the present application and the staff analysis /memorandum, their does not appear to be any `reasonable' basis for denial of this application." (See the Attorney's memo on page 47 -48.) Density Several neighbors thought that the density would be too high. The land use plan and zoning allow the developer to build town houses or apartments. Because the, developer is proposing town houses, there would be fewer units per acre than if the developer proposed apartments. For this three -acre site, the R 3H classification allows a density of 9.5 to 14.3 units per acre, depending on the type of unit. Apartment units generally produce fewer people per unit than town house units, so the City allows more apartment units per acre than town house units per acre. As an example, a developer could build 43 apartment units on this site or 31 town house units. Because there are fewer town house units per acre, town houses create less building mass and density than apartments. 3 Traffic Traffic on Ariel Street is an important concern ofthe neighbors. Eleventh Avenue has more than enough capacity to handle the traffic from this development. The City planned 11th Avenue as a major collector street. The City Engineer told me that 11th Avenue is designed to carry about 15,000 vehicle trips each day. The 1993 traffic counts show that 11th Avenue is carrying 8,300 vehicles each day. The proposed town houses would increase the traffic on .11th Avenue by 254 trips or a total of 8,534 vehicle trips per day. This is an insignificant increase. Eleventh Avenue could carry almost twice the traffic it now carries. The developer had a traffic study for this project. The study included the traffic from the town houses and the proposed retail development to the south. The study made the following findings: Traffic impacts from the town houses would not be significant. There would be acceptable service levels at the intersection of Ariel Street and 11th Avenue. The existing stop sign would be adequate to control traffic. The intersection would not need traffic lights. All driveways should be on Ariel Street. ni . ' ng the driveways on 11th Avenue would result in safer driving conditions, a higher level of service on 11th Avenue and would ensure that 11th Avenue operates efficiently as a collector street. See the traffic study starting on page 22.) The. land use plan change may reduce the potential traffic from this site. A one - story office building would. produce about the same amount of traffic as town houses. Traffic would increase if someone built a two - story office building. Noise Several neighbors said that the area was already too noisy. One party stated that it was especially bad around the holidays. The traffic from this development would not significantly change the noise levels on 11th Avenue. This development would only increase the traffic from about 8,300 vehicles a day to 8,554 or a 3% increase. In 1991, the staff did sound tests on the north side of 11th Avenue at the thirty-foot setback. The sound tests just met the State's regulations. As the north and south sides of 11th Avenue develop, traffic and sound levels may increase and exceed State standards. The developer may have to provide more setback or sound screening for the town houses from 11th Avenue. Particularly if the proposed retail center to the south develops. The City should consider this when the developer applies for plan approval. 4 Opposition to Rental. Dwellings The owners of five surrounding properties were opposed to rental dwellings. These owners thought there were enough rental units in the area. The City Attorney has advised me that the City . cannot deny a land use change because there may be too many of a type of business or because the dwellings are for rent versus owner - occupied. The City must leave those decisions to the free market system. The developer has had a market study done. The study shows that there is a shortage of two and three bedroom rental units for families. Some neighbors said that this proposal would lower the market value of their homes. The County Assessor's Office told me that there is no indication that this town house development would decrease market values. The developer believes that their project will increase property values in the neighborhood. They state that they would hire an appraiser to verify this if the City requests it. (See page 20) Crime increase Some neighbors were concerned that the proposed town homes would bring an increase of crime into the area. The City's Director of Public Safety, Ken Collins, told me that with more people, the potential for crime increases. He said that this was true with single dwellings as well. Chief Collins said that rental units did not mean that there would likely be more crime than owner- occupied units. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt the resolution on page 45. This resolution changes the land use plan on the north side of 1 1t Avenue, west of Ariel Street. The change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -3H (high- density multiple dwellings). This change is based on the following reasons: a. It would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies. b. It would be consistent with the property planned for R -3H to the north. c. The present LBC (limited business commercial) land use classification could generate more traffic than town houses. 2. Adopt the resolution on page 46. This resolution changes the zoning on the northwest corner of Ariel Street and 11th Avenue from F (farm residential) to R -3 (multiple dwellings). This change is based on the findings required by Code. 5 CITIZENS' COMMENTS I surveyed owners of the 30 surrounding properties within 350 feet of this site. Of the 17 .replies, four were in favor and 13 objected. In Favor l . I am in favor of this change to the multiple dwelling town house plan. (Kelt, 2444 White Bear Avenue) 2. It could be nice to have some new neighbors. (Jones, 2453 Crestwood Drive, North St. Paul) Opposed 1. If these are to be owner occupied units I question the market for same, given the length of time it takes to sell units in Crestwood. I AM NOT in favor of any more rental property in this immediate area. (Hildebrandt, 2443 Crestwood Drive, North St. Paul) 2. The area has enough rental units as is. That corner area is not large enough for that type of project. Make it a small park or leave it alone. We will all fight this roposal! (Ebensperger,p 25 10 Ariel Street, North St. Paul) 3. I object because of the added traffic and the age of the added people with a retirement housing on the other side of the street. (Roubik, 2040 13th Avenue, North St. Paul) 4. There should be single family homes or a par -three golf course here instead. (Malsom, 2466 Ariel Street, North St. Paul) 5. I object because of overcrowding, noise and traffic congestion in such a small area. Develop with self- owned houses or self -owned one -level town houses. (Kamrath,, 2499 Ariel Street, North St. Paul) 6. The density of the living units are about three times too much. You probable should develop German Street to draw off some traffic from Ariel. Your zoning map is ridiculous. No one has lots the size you show in Maplewood here anyway. (Landsom, 2035 Flanders Road, North St. Paul) 7. There are about three times as many units as the size of the site should allow. The number of the units should be reduced 50 %. German Street should be developed as an additional exit. Your maps are obsolete. (Anderson, 2047 Flanders Road, North St. Paul) F 8. Too many people on a small and too busy corner. The maps are. old. (Fernow, 2500 White Bear Avenue, Maplewood) 9. See the letters on pages 3 6 to 42 from the following persons: Jeanne McPhee and Germain Smith, 2492 Ariel Street, North St. Paul Gary J. Beuthling, 2480 Ariel Street, North St. Paul Louis J. and Patricia Karnrath, 2499 Ariel Street, Maplewood Dorothy J. Lllmars, 203 8 Flanders Road, North St. Paul 10. See the petition on pages 43-44. 7 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 3 acres Existing land use: Undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES No A house and County open space South: 11th Avenue and undeveloped land planned for LBC (limited business commercial) and R- 1(single dwellings). The City is considering a rezoning of this land to BC (business commercial) and R -3 (multiple dwellings). West: Undeveloped property planned for LBC and R -3H East: Houses PLANNING Comprehensive Plan Policies The land use plan has eleven general land use goals. of these, three apply to this proposal. They are: minimize land planned for streets, minimize conflicts between land uses and provide many housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that relate to this project. They are: Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single- family housing, public- assisted housing and low- and moderate- income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing. Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. 0 Promote a variety ofhousing types, costs. and ownership options throughout the City. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. The City will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. PUBLIC SAFETY The Fire Marshal recommends that the applicant install on -site fire hydrants and stop signs at Ariel Street. p: sec111townhome.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Existing Land Use Plan Map 3. Proposed Land Use Plan Map 4. Property Line/Zoning Map — Existing 5. Property LinctZoning Map — Proposed 6. Site Plan 7. Front Elevation 8. Side and Rear Elevation 9. Comprehensive Plan Change Statement 10. Rezoning Statement 11. Traffic Study 12. Letter from Jeanne McPhee and Germain Smith 13. Letter from Gary Bemdit 14. Letter from Louis 1. and Patricia Kamrath 15. Letter from Dorothy J. Ullmars 16. Petition 17. Land Use Plan Change Resolution 18. Zoning Map Change Resolution 19. Letter from the City Attorney Attachment 1 HffE BEAR LAKE COUNTY ' ` RW '` , • • GALL A woo wOODLYNN . AVE. , 0 0,4, C -• ENNER AVE. AVE LYM a o ' W . 3`r W s S cn STANDRID.GE AVE. BEAM AVE: . 19 ILI MAOLE VIEW AVE. .. .. RADATZ VE. A.,S" S11S1 AV : •• , .••.... W FORTH SAINT PAULPRAMSEY • COUNTY '•• COURT KOHLMAN AVEmerit Z • EDGEHILL RD. DEMONT AVIL ROOKS AVE, ••• •BROOKS AVE. EL Ey SO _ i # .•'AVE. iwr o o ' RVAIS W .,- c s AVE.cERVAIS Ai OVIEW AVE. z CT. NG DR. Y AA- AVE. Kn Loki CASTLE AVE. AVE- COPE AVE. C.7 t LARK AVE. .t Sri LAURIE •.R0. RD. z3A,r O" o LAURIE Cl RD Z 'Iarlc RST AVE. W 0 C3 v •a '` W Z .' n c Y Co. RD. . B E• oo 6URKE AVE. o O •.fin ... HARRIS AVE. T :•• ROSEWOOD AVE. N. % . `• N ,• l ROSEW D RAMSEY COUNTY • ' ' AV. AVE. NURSIN HOME AND5• " r FAIR GROUNDS : •' LOCATION MAP 4 N 10 Attachment 2 interchange Vad.nais Heights i j I i I L m minlor arterial G I O i o d C S . s 1 1. .. ».CO 1' D S 9 major collector c J d r C N C W W L m c 6- r v m V L O E m Q d tD m 1 . ge Interchange Attachment 3 interchange principal arterial E Vadnais Heights 0S R -3 Mr Co Rd. D r oM -1 mr --I major collector . r' _ m i s • 0 i 0 BC °Iw t minjor arterial _ w E s ` — _ .. _ co L (BC( gC(M 3 M - 1 1 ' -3(M) R -3 , j C 't4 i I , a 14f C 4 i 1@ C ttw_ r ~ y 0 rsC0 R0•'' a 1. H y major colle •r ""_'. C t0 t w c O Q m M m s o t r • 9e i N C W v cc Z v r C 6. O r V v 0 ao E lb PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN 12 Q N interchange Attachment 4 w s v8c 51) 17 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0 a 1 o .,C ..x EDGEHILLA12 — -j- Ides_• ,;31 I'Zr' 18 13 01 40 tit 0 119 N I 1 4(o 75 _ Gx.20 _ 0 2 23 24 627282930 W 16 { 7 18 19 2021. 242526 1 • N w i _ t9 VA VA CAll P; 4 T 7 T MOGREN BROTHERS LANDSCAPING 1 r f) i 6 17 18 19 20 2 1 22 23 24 S 26 i OFFICES 1 St . 1 33 - .1 Lu (o - t tLL.L 7)j _ Of 9' 9 fN 11 +10 h-F 9) t94.98 1l0 00 294, 57 r R eD wAVHrE . 3 3 2 1N //\i 2f 9.910 75 27 :•y . Yr t28 73) M N aM 7 R ' 28 29 30 N • q.5 : 6 3 4) 75 t St .o4 at. 4 1 r.. s 8oaVia, - -' •- -•-l- - - - - - m 7S o f 20 81 ' 2 4 8 a.ei ' ' , \ \ , Boo . SS8 !0 85' 1 Z ` n 3 ( S or lz.N 311 3 4o..c.. ° 1 o 5bld `` 1 6 1VyCw: p 8Z499Go r Co 3e vows X . ........ 37.0 FEET• Q < 2 22 :- q 1 o,c. ej C ¢ 7L Z t ac. PROPOSEDRAINBOWFOODSDENTAL CUNIC SITE o Is135 'r2 Strtet tSR+t. ::; 130 73 22 t iD 300 m+ 8 ® -2 % 3(4 f .7 40 21q JI ) 03 0 135 z, 120 35 , 36 i • 1:12444 12 ) 50 2434 ocoo 't .t 35 s a. 35 aREDEEMING 40 77.99 ! t..e off' S. i //,, unVE 1 1 15) 135 CHURCH L . 42 .5 f ,41aw GO f8 h 295 ' 91 r II 20 F 2492 C a s D too1000 ( 0 ) sm 4 19 0 18 J24W ` 33 1t.._ I 1 TH AVENUE MUM JIM o PROPERTY LINE / paST1NG 13 ZONING MAP 4 N mee6aeee 4 N Attachment 5 IL 17 i 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0 1 e 'o co z l 9 o .x. EDGEHILL z of A (2 •- - ,_. - sr ' reap' 18 t4lS.$$- 33 a tip' o or (s 0.9ate 1g iG OS N C 1S 14 13 12 .11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 2 *1 ZIPS P &"Jo . pq - — 10V 11 •C. I- A# . CL7 2 23,24 6 27 ?r8 29 30 W2930 17 I8 19 2021 ,24 25 6 27 829 0 o ! ! O0 z AVE* so W 0 LL ( 12 MOGREN BROTH •ti ERS LANDSCAPING 3 z I Z,.9` 7$ N X27Co c28 M GG me.. N i :o 7 16 17 18 19 2021 22 23 4 5 6 7 28 29 30 N d, M ES c3 4 3. ow Odin p 1 r44 33 - .. e•f.a. -•-3 _ 937 Z,GBa.e O 75.b , I 3 eo ' Boo zz 37r4 n e r / 2.83 ztti (=3 o t o loo C, 1 36j 311 251 v4 _ 3Ou t.3 4 A 7'! 1 .1 ,. 62500 .24M 38 v 44 ® <,, 0 t , F S C 2492 s t ::::. ' % Q . RAINBOW FOODS oEnrrA cuNic :; t . u. 0 12038100 A91:,jea sffEf119I .*.*r! 13 AMU 1 ( o)480 20i 19 O 18 IJ24M 711TH AVENUE -- 410 92, fCg3 4 SEE Es m PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP ovosm 14 Q N lain loisiow - a1CR 1 Ft- M oc 1813S72 f 33 i _ 1 RO . 3 .31 "p- o 30o mTL .,, i 24 ) 35 1 $.G9 ac . vi 2456 ( 3310COs°e35a•. , 12444 2 36 03 o N t J 2434 1 o00 v N t 7f''F 0REDEEMING3S 77. .: L. or < S. 41ro t rs/ 3S •t 5 X4Z.w . . Grimm.• CHURCH 41L W1NRion so C 1 - 9) ti tf 9 3 5 0doowi 480 20i 19 O 18 IJ24M 711TH AVENUE -- 410 92, fCg3 4 SEE Es m PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP ovosm 14 Q N RAMSEY COUNTY OPEN SPACE r Attachment .6 13th AVE. FLANDERS RD. 3 2 W W . ccN Iwo" J W co w • l • 7/ t1/r/Yv rt 1 1 I 11th AVENUE r 4 N mms al TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION C+ C+ s Winsor/FaricyArchitects,lnC, Scale pjA 3 '• D ` Projest Sheet Nos+ Suite 375 .26 West Fifth Street Date TOWNHOUSES, vMAPLEWOOD Saint Paul. Minnesota 55102 Drawn By. Mt 61 227 -0 "Proj. No. A7 562542 amma v ASPK LAP CONTRA: CORNE LAP SIDIf NUM WINDOWS RASTING TRIM INER BOARDS SCREEN . C+ c+ a 0 ALUMINUM WINDOWS TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION C+ Scale 1 : '• O " Project Sheet No. W Inc. Date MAPLEWOOD TOWNHOUSESSuite375.28 West Fifth Street Saint Paul. Minnesota 55102 Drawn By Mt, 612.227.0655 Proj. NO. A8- ssss.z it-1 LJ11..a %MLnU%J1 uvvn 1 T r 1 k ,;/-\ L rl C f-\ rl C LL C VH 1 1 U 1 V a BEE Attachment 9 n . Public Pur Statement AUG Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application LMU Dear Maplewood City Council/Staff: __.. _._..,.._.__,.. The following is a brief description of Shelter Corporation's proposed Maplewood Townhouse project located on the Northeast corner of the intersection of Ariel and 1 lth streets. In addition to the P roJ 'ect description, is a brief public. purpose statement addressing a number of reasons why this P roject would meet specific needs of the City of Maplewood. Proiect de_.scrit) ion: Maplewood Townhouses is a proposed 33 unit townhouse project consisting of 1 2BR/1 bath and 16 3BR12 bath units. Site amenities include on -site management office, common laundry facility children's tot lot and ample on -site parking. Each townhouse has individual front entry. Each unit will have its own attached garage entry. Unit amenities include a spacious 981 sq. ft and .1.226 sq. ft. floor plan that provide extra storage, individual patio /decks with privacy fences. Each unit will also be equipped with its own gas operated hot water heater and forced air furnace. The kitchens will include a full amenity of stove, hood vent, 16 sq. ft. refrigerator, garbage disposal, dish washer and extensive counter space. Public purpose: with the recent completion of the new affordable senior cottages built by Morgin and the senior cottages located in North St. Paul, Shelter has identified a tremendous need for a similar property but targeted to family in the City of Maplewood. For further statistics documenting the demand for affordable family housing, please refer to the attached market survey completed in February of this ear b Shenehon Co Along with this identified demand, the current legislation leadyyPY . g by legislator Orfield has been pushing for more first, second and third tier suburbs to provide affordable uali clean hous for individuals of moderate incomes. This is an opportunity forqtyg the City of Maplewood to be proactive and increase this type of affordable housing in their community. The site location, Northeast corner of Ariel and 11th streets is a perfect politically correct location with the designated Ramsey county open space to the north and already up and exiting commercial facilities to the west. Also, the city, in the early stages of development, will have ample opportunit to dictate what exactly will be built on this site along with the physicalPPPty attractiveness of the project. Another advantage of Shelter's purposed project is that it would actuall y g Pbeadownzoniofthecurrentco zoning plan, which would help address neighbor's concerns with regards to traffic issues. Shelter Corporation, unable to detail all of the benefits of its proposed townhouse project within this short summary, would like to request an informal meeting with any city staff/council members in order to P rovide a better understanding of what Shelter is proposing. 18 Attachment 10 PUBLIC PAUSE STATEMENT REZONING Dear Maplewood, Project „description Maplewood Townhouses is a proposed 33 unit townhouse project consisting of 17 2BR/1 bath and 16 3BR/2 bath units. Site amenities include on -site management office, common laund facility, children's tot lot and ample on- site parking. Each townhouse has individual front entry. Each unit will have its own attached garage entry. Unit amenities include a spacious 981 flp . or 1226 sq. ff. floor plan that provides extra storage, individual patio /decks with privacy fences. Each unit will also be equipped with its own gas operated hot water heater and forced air furnace. The kitchens will include a full amenity package of stove, hood vent, 16 . ft. refrigerator, garbage disposal, dish washer and extensive counter space. Public Pur ose: The public welfare of the community will benefit from the development of the proposed project in a number of ways. 1. Reducing traffic congestion. By panting the requested down zone for the proposed project from its current comprehensive plan of light industrial to high- density residential the City would eliminate the possibility of development of a strip mall or gas station type facility from being built in place of Maplewood Townhomes. Traffic congestion would be far less with a townhouse project than with a gas station facility due to the reduced average trips of residents cars from those of customers cars. Increased traffic relating to the townhomes would occur at acceptable hours rather than early morning and late evening hours the neighborhood would experience from a gas station or convenience store. 2. Improving safety from fire and other dangers. The current site is undeveloped land that contains an enormous amount of prairie grass and brash especially the Ramsey County designated open space that lies adjacent to the site along its northern boundary. By developing this site into a townhouse rental community, the developer would be eliminating an unsupervised fire hazard, especially when considering that the project will be equipped with individual fire extinguishers and meet or exceed all local and state fire codes. Other dangers that would be resolves by the development would be the elimination of wooded open space in which disruptive juvenile activity can take place. By the development of the proposed project, the site would be supervised by an employee of Shelter Corporation. 19 3. Providing adequate light and open space. Pursuant to the local city of Maplewood and State of Minnesota building codes the proposed project will have ample on -site light provided by 25 foot high light poles using shoebox style high pressure sodium lamp and is controlled by photocell. The fixtures are to be provided with cutoff lens to control light and site perimeter. It has been Shelter's experience most recently, with regards to its newest development, Andrew's Pointe Townhouses, that this system provides ample lighting and in some cases has reduced the overall -crime rate in and around its specific neighborhood. The open space will be more than adequate by following in building and site design. The addition of a on -site tot lot which will provide tenants with a' s ecific recreational facility. In addition, Ramsey County has designated an open space adjacent to the sites northern boundary. This open space designation restricts development in and around this area and will provide an enormous amount of open space for this local community. 4. Avoiding overcrowding. In general, by granting the zoning request, the city would be down grading the zoning designation in its comprehensive zoning plan. The would greatly attribute to any overcrowding that may occur with a strip mall or convenience store facility. In addition the unit design, with its excess storage capacity and additional storageg in the attached garages, will address any tenant storage needs. The additional open space designation as referenced in question 3 above will further contribute to an overcrowding issues or concerns that the city may have. 5. Conserving property values. This issue has typically arisen with regards to neighbors concerns whenever a new development is contemplated. As the land is designated for development rather than open space, the neighbors concerns must ultimately be addressed. The current development cost on a per unit basis for the proposed development is approximately $67,000 /unit. Due to the proposed aesthetics of the development, Shelter strongly believes that this development would greatly appreciate the property values in the surrounding community. If Shelter proceeds to move forward through the rezoning process, Shelter would, upon request by the City, commission an appraiser to verify the above referenced statement. 20 B. The proposed zoning change will not injure or detract from the neighboring ProePrty due to the fact that the proposed request would actually be a down zoning from what has been established in the current. comprehensive Zoning plan. As stated above, the request would actually be less dense than what was intended for its initial use. The townhouse style development with its attached garages and individual entries would give the property a neighbor feel that's consistent with the current surrounding facilities: C. The site currently has ample capacity for all utility and SAC/WAC that will be needed for the proposed development. For additional services that will be provided with relatively close proximity to the proposed development, please reference the following: Ameits Grocery Store Drug Store Church Hospital Health Clinic Bank Post Office Clothing Store Library Day Care Center Elementary School Secondary School Name Rainbow Foods VValgeens Mpiwd Covenant St. Johns Mplwd Surgery Norwest North St. Paul Fashion Bug Ramsey Cty Public New Horizon Beaver Lake Elem. Bill Murry High Address White Bear Ave White Bear Ave White Bear Ave 1575 Beam Ave 1655 Beam Ave 2945 White Bear 2523 7th Ave E White Bear Ave 1460 Skillman Ave 2251 VanDyke St. 1010 Sterling St. N 2625 Larpenteur Ave Distance from proposed evelopment 2/10 miles 2/10 miles 3/10 miles 3/10 miles 3/10 miles 4/10 miles 2/10 miles 2/10 miles 1.5 miles 7/10 miles 1.5 miles 2 miles NOTE: Shelter has attempted to address all of these concerns in a short statement as requested by this application. However, Shelter believes that addressing all of these issues is imperative to a successful development. Shelter is organizing an informal meeting with the local neighborhood and would welcome any participation from the City staff or council. 21 Attachment 11 M"LEWOOD TOWNHOUSE PROJECT SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT Prepared for Shelter Corporation 900 Second Avenue South Suite 880 Minneapolis, Minr esota 55402 Prepared by Biko Associates, Inc. 2501 Dupont Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 October 1994 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................ 0000. .......................... 1 Zoni and Adjacent Land Use .0000.: ................ ........ , .. 1 Previous Traffic Study 0000 0 0 0 . 0 0000 , ... 0 0 0 0 , , .. 0 .................. 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . 0 0 0 0 , .. , 0 0 0 0 ........................... 3 Existing. Background Traffic and 1996 Background Traffic Forecasts 0000. ......... 3 TripGeneration .00............99. .......... ................ . . * Trip.Distribution . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . It . . . • . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 PM Peak Hour and Daily Traffic Assignments .. ........................ 5 Intersection Capacity Analysis and Traffic Operations ,Analysis . . 000.0..... 0 ... 10 CONCLUSIONS 0 0 0 0 .. . 0 0 0 0 0 ** 0000 ............................. 12 LIST 0"Juv FIGURES 1. Site Plan ... .............. .. , ........................... 2 2. 1994 and 1996 No Development Two-Way Daily Traffic Forecasts ............... 4 3. 1994 and 1996 No Development PM Peak Hour Turning Movements ............. 7 4. 1995 Forecast PM Peak Hour Turning Movements for Build MTP and Build MTP and Proposed Retail Development 0 *0 00 ............. .. ...... ....... 8 5.1996 Build MTP and Build MTP and the Retail Development Two-Way DailyTraffic Volumes ............. ............................... 9 LIST OF TABLES 1. Trip Generation for Proposed Townhouse Development ...................... 5 2. Intersection Capacity Analysis Results . . .............................. 10 23 f INTRODUCTION This report documents analyses conducted to identify the extent of traffic impacts that would occur with implementation of a proposed residential development in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota. The development (the Maplewood Townhouse Project) is proposed by the Shelter Corporation to include 31 townhouses on approximately 3 acres of land. The .development site is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection formed by 11th Avenue and Ariel Street. The site plan for the development is illustrated on Figure 1. As shown, the site's access drives would be located on Ariel Street. While the development site is located. in the City. of Maplewood, it is immediately adjacent to the City of North St. Paul. Existing residences that front on Ariel Street are located in North St. Paul, and would be directly east of the proposed development. As part of the study process, city engineers from both Maplewood and North St. Paul were contacted for input in the study. ZONING AND ADJACENT LAND USE The proposed development site is currently zoned Farm /Residential, and allowed uses are agricultural and single family residential The site is identified in the Ma lewood Comprehensive Plan for business /lightgy . p h density residential. As mentioned the deve is proposedndustryandhigdes y to consist of 31ppp townhouses. Therefore, a rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan amendment are being sought by the developer. The development site is bordered to the north and east by single family residences along Ariel Street. A 215,500 square foot retail center has been proposed for the northeast quadrant of the intersection formed by TH 36/White Bear Avenue. The retail center site is south of the proposed townhouse development site and extends to the southwest quadrant of the l 1th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection. PREVIOUS TRAFFIC STUDY A traffic impact study for the proposed retail development (Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc.) was submitted to Ramsey County and the City of Maplewood in September, 1994. The traffic study analyzed 1996 traffic impacts, representing conditions forecast to occur one year after the opening of the retail development. The traffic study focused on four intersections along White Bear Avenue, which are under county jurisdiction, and one intersection along 11th Avenue immediately east of the 11th Avenue/White Bear Avenue intersection. The study showed that traffic generated by the retail development, when added to 1996, forecast background traffic, will generally not affect intersection operations. Existing (1994) intersection levels of service (LOS) without the retail development were found to be above average at LOS B and C. The analysis showed that those same levels of service would occur in 1996 with implementation of the retail development. The analysis also discussed the potential for stacking problems at the intersections of White Bear Avenue and the TH 36 North and South Ramps. Stacking problems occur when the space provided for vehicles queued at a red light is not long enough to meet demand. Further analysis indicated that the stacking problems could be resolved by adjusting the traffic signals along White Bear Avenue. Maplewood Townhouse Project Site Traffic Impact Report Shelter Corporation 24 Biko Associates, Inc. Page I 11th AVENUE Nam=" NorthPLEWOODShelterCorporation Figure 1 WXTHOUSTOIN Ed Site Plan Biko No Scale P R,0,j E C T' Associates Inc. 25 I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS MAPLEWOOD TOV NHOUSE TRAFFIC STUDY APPROACH i The study approach followed the standard traffic impact analysis methodology. This methodology includes background traffic forecasting and trip generation, trip distribution traffic assi nment andpgP g , intersection capacity and traffic operations analyses. Year 1996 background traffic forecasts were prepared by assuming a 1. percent annual growth rate for traffic currently using streets in the study area. This growth rate was identified by Barton- Aschman dissociates in the traffic study for the retail development and is supported by field studies conducted on other projects in the Maplewood area. Trip generation for the townhouse development was calculated based on data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in Trip Generation, Fifth Edition; 1991. Weekday trip distribution was estimated based on the geographic distribution of employment centers in the Twin Cities region. Traffic assignments to the street system were based on the shortest travel time and distance between the residential development and the employment centers. Because of the potential for the combined traffic volumes from the proposed residential and retail developments to negatively im act the system of streets and intersections this traffic stud addressedPyy 1996 conditions with both projects in place. This was accomplished by analyzing the following development scenarios: 1 Existing Condition 1996 No Development 1996 Build Maplewood Townhouse. Project (MTP) 1996 Build MTP and the Retail Development The traffic study was based on the assumption that the Maplewood Townhouse Project would be developed and in place before the retail development. EXISTING BACKGROUND TRAFFIC AND 1996 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FORECASTS Figure 2 shows two -way daily traffic volumes in the study area for 1994. These are shown for Ariel Street, 11th Avenue, and McKnight Road. The 1994 volumes were forecasted from 1993, unadjusted counts taken by Mn/DOT and the City of North St. Paul. Figure 2 also shows the 1996, two -way daily traffic forecasts for the No Development condition. These were forecasted based on the 1994 volumes and a 1 percent annual growth rate. Maplewood Townhouse Project Biko Associates Inc. Site Traffic Impact Report Page 3 Shelter Corporation 26 w ;h. > r !fa - :,,.«iY dsn #...*4 .:drY. .ar i(.F .f <sVe . 't7 f +tb. `dkFiYiia:. - 1.wy... <w. ''AM'.i-r ..: E i.; C2-j .. v :: %: %$i QA'a?M` +1MU, ..^.mils +b p i M 0 Counts taken by Mn/DOT o N' j r1 f J'f/'fJ' rri r'fJ the City f North St. Pauly V 9300 8700 9100 1 I th Ave. v 1994 Two -Way Daily Traffic 4400 Forecasts Based on 1993 0 Counts taken by Mn/DOT o the City f North St. Pauly o 0 4 .2 f i 9500 8900 11 th Ave. 9300 4500 Two-Way Daily o Traffic Forecasts 0 N Figure 2EMShelterCorporationrth 1994 and 1996 Two=Wa Biko Dail y Traffic Forecasts Associates No Scale Source Mn/DOT and the City ofInc. North St. Paul 1996 No Development TRIP GENERATION Table l presents average trip generation for the average weekday. As shown, the proposed residential development will generate 254 daily trips. Twenty -one (21) trips will take place during the AM peak hour, and 29 trips will take place during the PM peak hour. I TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT Land Use Variable Daily Trips AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total In1 Out Total Townhouse 31 Dwelling Units 254 4 17 21 19 10 29 rty v+erieruIcuri, rc1rc r luurl, lubutuic UI 1 ranspUrEa. 1 UIl Il lI1ceIS; lyyl Biko Associates, Inc.; October 1994. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trip distribution for the project is presented . below: 0 7 percent to /from the north on Ariel Street 15 percent to /from the east on 11 th Avenue 2 percent to /from the south on Ariel Street b 75 percent to /from the west on 1 l th Avenue PM PEAK HOUR AND DAILY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS PM peak hour traffic assignments for the four development scenarios described earlier are illustrated on Figures 3 and 4. These traffic assignments which are presented as turning movements, were made to two intersections, 11th Avenue /Ariel Street and 11th Avenue/McKnight Road. These are the two intersections that the Cities of Maplewood and North St. Paul identified for analysis in this report. The PM peak hour was selected as the time period for analysis because it represents the busiest period4 of the day for traffic. PM peak hour traffic largely consists of commuters and is defined as the 60 minute period between 4:30 and 6:00 PM when traffic volumes are at their highest. Figure 3 shows intersection turning movements for, the existing condition. These turning movements were counted by Biko Associates, Inc. during field studies conducted on Wednesday, October 19 and Thursday, October 20, 1994. Also shown on Figure 3 are PM peak hour turning movement forecasts for the 1996 No Development condition. Under this condition, neither the residential nor the retail development have been implemented in 1996. The 1996 turning movement forecasts were calculated by Maplewood Townhouse Project Site Traffic Impact Report Shelter Corporation F Biko Associates, Inc. Page 5 28 applying the 1 percent annual growth rate to the 1994 turning movements that were observed during the. field studies. Figure 4 shows turning movements for the 1996 Build Maplewood Townhouse Project (MTP). These were derived by adding assigned traffic from the proposed residential project to the 1996 No Development, turning movement forecasts Turning movements are also shown on Figure 4 for the 1996 Build MTP and the Retail Development condition. These turning movements represent .full build -out of both the proposed residential and retail developments. Turning movements for the retail development were based on information from the traffic study that was prepared by Barton- Aschman Associates. That study indicated that 20 percent of the daily trips to /from the retail development would use l lth Avenue east of the retail site. Figure 5 illustrates 1996 two -way daily traffic volumes forecast to occur under the 1996 Build Maplewood Townhouse Project condition and the 1996 Build MTP and the Retail Development condition. Maplewood Townhouse Project Site Traffic Impact Report Shelter Corporation Biko Associates, Inc. Page 6 y y{yy , .. _ .... ... _ ...:,,. .....a' Oiw.> ti< .c:as. "1}3+i/6y.z•k+t4likl'+YI W i.wlie+lK. C*- . .i`,i'.aUx A r '.— .' ° eYrpl{ {'' S'as 24.4 400 -- 07c —z Q t-- 328 i' 12 0 A t llthAve. 132.4 t 408 m-*- 116 -- 26 'i e ' .'- 158 1996 No Development PM Peak Hour 1lurning Movements Shelter Corporation Figure 3 North 1994 Existing and 1996 No Development Biko PM Peak Hour lbrning Movements Associates No scale Source: Counts taken by. BIKO Associates, Inc.Inc on 10/19/94 & 10/20/94 bo 4.12 4— 87 r 32 11 th Ave.129 J , 114 — 1994 Existing ' V N ^' ass , M , PM Peak Hour 1lurning Movements a oI- 4 Q v ,. 4.12 f— 5 1 33 38 11th Ave.t 132 408 — 26 `D 116 — 159 132 . 116 -- 1.59 I T r A;zBuildMaplewood Townhouse Project 41 12 345 12 33 J MA Figure 4 Shelter Corporation N •onh 1996 Forecast PM Peak Hour lbrning Movements I TOWNHOUSE Build Maplewood Townhouse Project and Build Maplewood Biko Townhouse Project and Proposed Retail Development Associates No ScalePR0JECTInc. Source: Barton- Aschmang, Inc; September, 1994 BIKO Associates, Inc; October, 1 994 47' t tlthAve. 164.4 506 — Build Maplewood 32 , 14 197 A-4n Townhouse Project and Proposed Retail Development b 4.7 o n •-+12r-+ et oo1 4 - 419 12 r' M 102 33 MA Figure 4 Shelter Corporation N •onh 1996 Forecast PM Peak Hour lbrning Movements I TOWNHOUSE Build Maplewood Townhouse Project and Build Maplewood Biko Townhouse Project and Proposed Retail Development Associates No ScalePR0JECTInc. Source: Barton- Aschmang, Inc; September, 1994 BIKO Associates, Inc; October, 1 994 47' t tlthAve. 164.4 506 — Build Maplewood 32 , 14 197 A-4n Townhouse Project and Proposed Retail Development ai # ,, } ... : . :. .. { ,3..:rt H- -,kdot ,,..s'rt.t . >..:.':, ir'a::fx, =a y•tdr is# ;irat3 a't °: x a O 1 bo rf V 9,700 8,900 I I th Ave. raw 1996 Build Maplewood 9,300 4,500 Townhouse Project O 0 0 N O p M 11 10,900 11,300 I I th Ave. 1996 Build Maplewood Townhouse Project and o Proposed Retail 00 Development o N Shelter CorporationMAPLEWOOD Figure 5 North 1996. Build Two -WayTOWNHOUSEDaflyTrafficForecastBiko PR 0 J E C T'* Associates No Scale Inc Source: BIKO Associates, Inc. 4,800 t INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSES intersection Capacity Current traffic control at the intersection of 11th Avenue and Ariel Street is a STOP sign. Traffic on Ariel Street is stopped to allow 11th Avenue traffic to pass through the intersection. The intersection of 11th Avenue and McKnight Road is controlled by a traffic signal. Exclusive left -turn lanes have been constructed on the north and south legs of the intersection, and the traffic signal currently operates on a maximum 140 - second, vehicle- actuated signal cycle. Analysis was conducted in this study to determine how the current traffic controls would work -under the various development scenarios. The analysis evaluated intersection level of service (LOS),, which is a measure of the average stop delay vehicles experience at either STOP signs or traffic signals. LOS A represents the shortest delay, and LOS F represents extremely long delays and congestion. LOS A, B, C, and D are acceptable, LOS E is tolerable, and LOS F is unacceptable. As shown in Table 2, existing and forecast LOS at the two intersections is no lower than LOS D. The intersection levels of service shown in Table 2 are based on results of the Highway Capacity Manual's computerized intersection capacity analyses for unsignalized and signalized intersections. Computer print outs from the analysis are provided in an Appendix to this report. TABLE 2 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS (LEVEL OF SERVICE) INTERSECTION 1994 Existing 1996 No Development 1996 Build Townhouse Project 1996 Build Townhouse Project and Retail Development WB Lefts A WB Lefts A WB Lefts A WB Lefts A EB Lefts A EB Lefts A EB Lefts A EB Lefts A NB Lefts D NB Lefts D NB Lefts D NB Lefts D 11th Avenue / Ariel NB Thrus C NB Thrus C NB Thrus C NB Thrus D Street NB Rights A NB Rights A NB Rights A NB Rights A SB Lefts C SB Lefts D SB Lefts D SB Lefts D SB Thrus C SB Thrus C SB Thrus C SB Thrus D SB Rights A SB Rights A SB Rights A SB Rights A 1 I th Avenue /McKnight Road B B B B Source: Biko Associates, Inc.; October 1994. tiK(i. I ice. Irll i.II I I .nI I A Maplewood Townhouse Project Biko Associates, Inc. Site Traffic Impact Report Page 10 Shelter Corporation 33 Traffic Operations As shown on the site plan, Figure 1, the proposed project's two driveways would be located on Ariel Street. City of Maplewood standards require minimum 20 -foot spacing between driveways on local residential) streets. The centerline to centerline distance between the two driveways on the site plan is shown to be approximately 135 feet apart, and, therefore, within City guidelines. The City has asked that this study analyze the impacts of -locating the two driveways on 11 th Avenue. This alternative driveway location would result in higher levels of service for the northbound and southbound turning movements at the 11th Avenue / Ariel Street intersection, than those shown in Table 2. The .improvements in level of service would Occur because the volume of vehicles at the intersection would be reduced. However, level of service on 11th Avenue and safety could possibly be negatively affected by this alternative driveway location. Collector streets like 11 th Avenue have higher permitted speeds than residential streets and are designed to carry, more traffic than residential streets. Because of these factors t collector streets should not have as many drivewayss as residential streets. l If the proposed project's two access drives were to be located on 11th Avenue, the most easterly driveh should be spaced a minimum of 120 feet (centerline to centerline) west of the. 1 lth Avenue / Ariel Street intersection. The most westerly of the two driveways should be spaced a minimum of 120 feet (centerline to centerline) west of the first drive. Additionally, the easterly drive should be designed for inbound movements, with outbound movements taking place at the westerly drive. The 120 -foot distance may seem excessive compared to the City of Maplewood's 30 -foot minimum spacing specification. However, this distance provides adequate spacing so that eastbound vehicles turning left onto Ariel Street would not interfere with those turning left to enter the site. Maplewood Townhouse Project Biko Associates, Inc. Site Traffic Impact Report Page 11 Shelter Corporation 34 a t CONCLUSIONS Analysis results showed that traffic impacts resulting from the proposed Maplewood Townhouse Project will not be significant. Generating only 254 trips on the average week, day, 21 trips during the AM peak hour, and 29 trips during the PM peak hour, traffic from the site will be an insignificant addition to the background traffic. Based on input from the Cities of Maplewood and North St. Paul, two intersections were analyzed in this study; 11th Avenue /Ariel Street and 11th Avenue /McKnight Road. The intersection capacity analysis showed that acceptable levels of service (LOS no lower than D) would occur at both of these intersections under each of four development conditions that were analyzed in this report. The four development conditions are listed below: 1994 Existing Condition 1996 No Development 1996 Build Maplewood Townhouse Project (MTP) 1996 Build MTP and the proposed retail development at the intersection of TH 36/White Bear Avenue As shown by the results in Table 2, the STOP sign at the 11th Avenue /Ariel Street intersection would continue to efficiently control traffic in 1996 with implementation of the Maplewood Townhouse Project. The analysis also showed that the STOP sign will continue to function efficiently when traffic from the proposed retail development is added to traffic that would be generated by the townhouse development. The analysis showed that the traffic signal at the intersection of 11th Avenue /McKnight Road will operate at acceptable LOS B in 1996 with the townhouse development in place. Furthermore, LOS B operations would occur at this intersection with the addition of traffic from the proposed retail development. The overall opinion of the analysis is that the Maplewood Townhouse Project driveways should be located on Ariel Street, as shown on the site plan. Minimizing the number of driveways on 11th Avenue will result in safer driving conditions, a higher level of service on 11th Avenue, and will ensure that 11th Avenue operates efficiently as a collector street. The analysis did show, however, that the proposed project's driveways could be located on l lth Avenue. If the driveways were to be located on 11th Avenue, the following recommendations should be followed: Minimum 120 -foot spacing (centerline to centerline) between the easterly driveway and the intersection of 11th Avenue /Ariel Street.. 0 Minimum 120 -foot spacing (centerline to centerline) between the easterly driveway and the westerly driveway. 0 Design the easterly driveway for inbound turns to the Maplewood Townhouse Project. Design the westerly driveway for outbound turns from the Maplewood Townhouse Project. Maplewood Townhouse Project Biko Associates, Inc. Site Traffic Impact Report Page 12 Shelter Corporation 35 r le' z Maplewood City Hall 1830 East Maplewood North St. 2526 East North St. City Council Building County Road B MN 55109 Paul City Council Seventh Avenue Paul, MN 55109 Attachment 12 i Dear Council Members: As residents at 2492 Ariel, we strongly abject to the proposed building of the Shelter Corporation an the northwest corner of Ariel and Eleventh Street. We protest this proposal-for the following reasons. 1) The property on the northwest corner of Ariel & Eleventh is NOT zoned for apartment buildings. It is zoned for light industrial/ condos and that is what I believe it should remain zoned for. We do. NOT believe the zoning restrictions should be lifted or shifted to accomodate Shelter Corporation. 2) The number of units, (33 two and three bedroom units) and therefore the number of people Shelter is proposing for these apartments is totally unacceptable. a) Ariel Street is NOT able to handle the amount of increased in traffic. As a border road, Ariel is not a polished, well-kept road. As residents who both drives Ariel every day, we had no probler with the current conditions or the current traffic. To increase traffic with possibly 60 more vehicles, however, is outrageous. b) Maplewood and North St. Paul already have the problem of noise polution in this section. Shelter's proposal would increase that problem by I30 -150 people. 36 Z , ` 3) There is a significant water drainage problem in this section of Maplewood /North St. Paul. The fact that the acreage on the northwest corner of Ariel and Eleventh is law serves as a reminder that we need areas for water run -off. 4) There is life existing there already. That piece of property is home to much wildlife: deer, fawn, fax, racoon, rabbits, pheasants, geese, wild f blooming shrubs, etc. As residents, we enjoy the life already that exists there. There ARE areas that should not be developed. Those areas should stand as a testament to our need for nature. We do not believe all development is "bad"; we do. believe development should be held accountable for principles higher than increasing revenues or convenience. 5) There is no need for another apartment building. For 12 of the last 14 years, I lived in apartment buildings in the inner city and in the suburbs. There is NOT a shortage of living spaces. For those reasons, we do not believe the northwest corner of Ariel and Eleventh should be rezoned for Shelter Corporation. Please vote to maintain the present restrictions. Sincerely, Jeanne McPhee and Germaine Smith 2492 Ariel North St. Paul H t e- H c G u r e- 37 Attachment 13 August 31, 1994 City of Maplewood 1830 E County Road B Maplewood Mtn 55109 Attn: Thomas E kstr a nd Re: Project: Maplewood T.H. ( 11) SEP My. name is Cary Beuthling, I have owned and lived at 2480 Ariel St. North for 6 years. I am very concerned that the proposal Shelter Corporation's 33 unit townhouse development project could be disastrous for the surrounding residents and community. Traffic can 11th Avenue is already very, very busy. Many cars cut through Ariel St. from the over - abundance of shopping and apartment buildings i n the area. There have been many accidents to Ariel St., and 11th Avenue one of which I know of caused a death.The addition of 66 plus cars in and out of Ariel would be a. serious mess.. Currently, the noise levels from 11th Avenue and White Bear Ave. are already intolerable. According to the site plan layout, the townhouse entrance and exit would be directly in front of , my house. Headlights would shine through my front windows every no It is very clear that the addition of multiple dwelling housing across Ariel would reduce the current market value of the surrounding homes considerably and make it more difficult to sell. The existing homes in front of the proposal site have aE value of $100,000 $ 200,000. I have worked hard for this home. I don't feel I should sacrifice my home's value and the neighborhood's environment for the financial gain of a developer who has no other interest than to profit from the developing the project . There are already radius, including development. My home was fea.tu years ago. Crime congested housing far too many low income dwellings within a 6 block apa.rtme nt buildings, townhomss and cottage red on Channel 4's Dimension Report. on crime several in the area is on the rise. I believe more would attract more crime. I would be receptive to middle to upper bracket homes with lots similar in size to the existing ones on North Ariel. This would I till allow most of the land intact and not be so congested. I would also be 'in f a.vor of leaving the land na tur a. l or adding wetland and wildlife habitat. I would be more than happy to pay additional taxes to develop a park or wildlife area. The destruction of the current natural wildlife habitat would be a tragedy. Sinc rely, 1 Ga y J. Beuth g 0 l 5 Icy Attachment 14 7'L66 U UA woo ool latoou *000i LZ .e .. ' tics o ..- // ' t;L 0 do I hill o 00 .v ate. 40 op M 1 41 FI Attachment 15 8-29-94 A TO: Mr, Thomas Ekstrand RE: Nei Surve Letter'of 8-23-94 I - attended the informational meetin put on by the Shelter Corporation and ,I object to the proposed use of this propert 1. Rental propert of the proposed t would lower our propert values 2. Unattractive*str*uctures and too man 3 SO Traf f is routed in and out on Ariel would cause much con and backup to get onto 11th it is hard to turn east from the north now 4-wa stop would not be enou in the a.m. and p.m. 4. Noise levels in this nei are extremel hi now* 5. This area would become overl saturated proposal 6. 1 OBJECT TO ANY PROJECT THAT WOULD ENTER & EXIT ON ARIEL I would not object to: 1. Owned townhomes, but fewer than the rental proposed project 20 Senior townhomes similar to those east of Ariel on 11th, but fewer than the proposed 3. Recreational uses 4. Senior citizens home/Da facilit I think an overall plan should be developed with the vacant propert east of White Bear Avenue and north and south of 11th. This would provide for better communit balance. Sincerel Doroth J. Lillmars cc: Cit of North St Paul En Dept. 42 PETITION We, the undersigned, oppose the construction of 33 rental townhome units, known as Maplewood Townhomes, to be built on three and one -half acres on the parcel of land located on the northwest corner of l lth Avenue and Ariel Street in Maplewood, MN. We feel the location of these buildings will greatly jeopardize the wildlife that abounds in that as well as connecting areas, and may pollute the wetlands just north of the proposed construction. Any construction on this land will also Densely increase noise and air pollution and will cause major traffic difficulties. qu .5; 76 O tLe;Z4 f7 iiin .e PETITION We, the undersigned, oppose the construction of 3 3 rental townhome units, known as Maplewood Townhomes, to be built on three and one -half acres on the parcel of land located on the northwest corner of 11th Avenue and Ariel Street in Maplewood, MN. We feel the location of these buildings will greatly jeopardize the wildlife that abounds in that as well as connecting areas, and may pollute the wetlands just north of the proposed construction. Any construction on this land will also immensely increase noise and air pollution and will cause ,major traffic difficulties. 3TRw 77 a 0 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WI1EREAS, the Shelter Corporation applied for a change to the City's land use plan from LBC (.limited business commercial) to R -3H (high - density multiple dwellings ). WHEREAS, this change applies to the north side of 1 l th Avenue, west of Ariel Street. The legal description is: The East 3 47 feet of the NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, except the North 278.94 feet, thereof. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On. November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council the land use plan change. 2. On 1994, the City Council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning. and City staff.g Y NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described change. for the following reasons: a. It would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies. b. It would be consistent with the property planned for R -3H to the north. c. The present LBC (limited business commercial) land use classification could generate more traffic than town houses. The Maplewood City Council approve this resolution on , 1994. 45 ZONING MAP CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Shelter Corporation applied for a change in the zoning map from F (farm residential) to R -3 (multiple dwelling residential). WB. EREAS, this change applies to the northwest corner of Ariel Street and Eleventh Avenue. The legal description is: The East 370 feet of the NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4 in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, except the North 278.94 feet, thereof. WIHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the change. 2. On , 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City star published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described change in the zoning map for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3 The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on _ 111994 . 46 Hannigan e;iP Kelly R A. A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W 1750 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W. QUARNSTROM November 14, 1994 Mr. Michael McGuire City Manager Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 -2797 612) 224 -3781 FAX (612) 223 -8019 RE: Maplewood Townhouses /Comprehensive Plan Change and Rezoning Dear Mr. McGuire: The City Council will be considering an application by Shelter Corporation for a comprehensive plan change and rezoning for the property located at the northwest corner of 11th Avenue and Ariel Street. Mr. Ekstrand has prepared a staff memorandum dated November 1,1994. This office has reviewed that application and the staff memorandum. The comprehensive plan is legally considered to be rimaril a policy statement b thep yCity. A such it is considered to be almost entirely legislative decision and thereforeYg an exercise of pure discretionary authority. The courts are extremel reluctant to interfere with the discretlor,. / Iegislaiive actions of elected officials. There is virtually no judicial precedent whichy p discusses the standards for a revision of a comprehensive plan. In general terms the courts are likely to interpret any action upon a comprehensive Ian amendment under the general standardpgof "reasonableness ". In light of the present application and the staff -analy there does not appear to be any "reasonable" basis for denial of this application, The question of the rezoning is somewhat more regulated. According to state law, zoningordinancesaredefinedtobe "official controls ". Minn. Stat. Section 473.865 requires the City to adopt "official controls" that are consistent with the comprehensive plan. In this particular case, the City appears to have an affirmative obligation to rezone the subject property to conform to the existing LBD plan designation or the proposed R - 3(H) plan designation. The existing zoningclassificationofFisnotappropriate. 47 To deny a rezoning application, the City Council must identify reasons which are legall sufficient and factually supported. There are a variety of reasons which have been accepted b the courts as Legally sufficient". Those reasons include traffic, noise, smell, environmental problems, neighborhood compatibility, effect a on ne hborin market value and conformancePgg between the zoning ordinance and the comprehensive plan. In this case, it would be proper toPPdenyanR -3 rezoning if the plan is left as LBD. However, if the plan is left as LBD, then the zoning must be changed to conform to that plan. It is extremely important to .recognize that market economics should not be considered a legally .reasonable factor. Please find attached a copy of a 1973 decision entitled Metro .500, Inc. vs. City of Brooklyn Park. This is the key case in Minnesota restricting the ability of cities. to interfere with market conditions. However, the City does have some ability to act to prevent or eliminate economic blight. Attached is another decision from 1988 entitled Farranto Brothers, Inc. vs. ,City of New Brighton. In order to sustain a reason related to economic blight, there needs to be strong, verifiable facts of economic blight. As a final note, it should be made. clear that the City Council must not differentiate between owner and renters.Although renters are not b themselves considered to be ag protected class ", many protected categories tend to fall within the renter rou . For example,g P many women and people of color can be found within rental groups. The decision of the City gCouncilinactingagainstrentalgroupscouldbeconstitutionallychallenged if shown to have a disparate impact upon those protected groups. Furthermore, there is the possibility that such an action could be found to be a violation of the federal fair housin g act. Please advise this office if you have any further questions regarding this pendingPg application. Sincerely yours, JJH:kmi 48 Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 11 -07 -94 Coihikssioner Sigmundik moved to add Menard's to the agenda p-ftfffi"'_7 A. Commissionefltossbach seconded Aye The motion passed. V. PRESENTATIONS Chair Axdahl rented resolutions of appreciation to She lenspach and Roger Anitzber„ger'and thanked them for their time spent on the Plannin nunission. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Comprehensive Plan Change and Rezoning: Maplewood Townhouses (11th Avenue and Ariel St.) Secretary Olson read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. Mr. Olson said that, even though the land use plan is a guide, a city would need justification to deny a use that is consistent with the plan. Ken Haider Director of Public Works, explained how traffic flow and capacities are calculated. Garrett Carlson, representing Shelter Corporation, introduced Mike Jordan of Winsor/Faric Y Architects, Inc., the architect for the project. Mr. Jordan stated that there would be 31 rental town houses (one unit would be completely , an ofhandicap-accessible), office and Is P ) laundry, and a play area. He also stated that landscaping would be used to provide a buffer and discussed parking availability. Chairperson Axdahl opened the public hearing for comments from the public. Louis Kamrath, 2499 Ariel Street, said he is opposed to the project because of noise, traffic and drainage conditions. Patricia Kamrath, 2499 Ariel Street, was concerned about the number of children that would live in the units, the length of the leases, and the separation planned between her house and the development. Jinn Malsom, 2466 Ariel, asked how these town. Houses effect the value of surrounding homes and felt that some type of traffic control was needed on 11 th Avenue. Carl Keller of Keller Properties, a property management company that manages the neighboring Crestwoodgg Townhome Association, spoke of the traffic problems on 11 th Avenue. Bradley King, 2033 13th Avenue had questions about the traffic study done on Ariel Street, particularly as it related to 13th Avenue and East County Road C. William Smith, with Biko Associates, Inc. of 2501 Dupont Avenue North in Minneapolis,P p s gave details of a traffic study they prepared for the project. Robert and Vicki Smoyer, 2599 Ariel Street, said they were against the town houses because of traffic and potential water problems. Kathy Stuempert, 2612 Ariel Street, wanted more area left Planning Commission Minutes of 11 -07 -94 3- open for watershed. Dorrie Paycer, 2452 Crestwood Drive, spoke about the additional number of children that would be attending district schools. Since there were no finrther comments, the public hearing was closed. The Commission discussed drainage in this area, especially the property to the north. Ken Haider, Director of Public Works, stated that a number of things could be done on site to make sure that drainage does not go off site to this property. Grading wouldpg be such that the new impervious areas, i.e. roofs, driveways, etc., would have to drain internally and then be collected in pipes and probably deposited in the ditch system north on Ariel or to the west in the existing 30-inch outlet. The only external drainage would probably be off an adjacent backslope that would be deterred by grass or turf. Commissioner Kittridge moved the L Planning Commission recommend: 1. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan on the west side of Ariel Street, north of 11th Avenue. The change is from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -3H (high- density multiple dwellings). This change is based on the following reasons: a. It would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals and policies. b. It would be consistent with the property planned for R -3H to the north. C. The present LBC (limited business commercial) land use classification would generate significantly more traffic than town houses. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Kittridge, Kopesky, Pearson, Sandell, Sigmundik, Thompson Nays— Rossbach The motion passed. Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission recommend: 1. Adoption of the resolution which changes the zoning on the northwest corner of Ariel Street and 11th Avenue from F (farm residential) to R -3 (multiple dwellings). This change is based on the findings required by Code. Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Kittridge, Kopesky, Pearson, Sandell, Sigmundik, Planning Commission ..4_ Minutes of 11 -07 -94 Thompson Nays— Rossbach The motion passed. Secretary Olson stated that this item would be heard by the City Council on November 28, 1994. Public hearing notices will be sent. B. Maplewood Retail Addition Ke oberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Mr. Roberts stated th when wrote the report they were waitin for additional traffic anal sis. segY Y County es not have all the traffic information at this time that they nee om the developer. ecommendations in the staff report were based on the ass.. tions thatp he traffic stu ' es would be all worked out and Ramsey County tra c concerns would be satisfied. Sint this has not happened, staff would recomme the tablin g of this request until those issues are answered. Mr. Roberts discus d the project because residents were preserik or the public hearingg Marc Kruger of 113 95 Fib Avenue North in Ply uth, Minnesota, the developer, introduced Alan Kretman anti John Dietrich p ers with RLK Associates, and Ron Krank of KKE Architects, to resent the pro" ct. Commissioner Kittrid a asked if the developer p g er would comply with the traffic r uirements of Ramsey CoupppYyt when available. Mr. Kruger.said they WOUX4ke the Commission to consider all recommendations, and make approv&subj ect to satisfaction of County requirements for traffic. The Commission disc sed tr * ic issues on White Bear Avenue. Chairperson tclahl opened e public hearin or comments from the public. Carl Keller, representing Cre ood Townhomes, as d the developer to explain the east side of the project. Mr,/keller had questions about. e closing of Castle Avenue and the density of the mufti- family units that will be built. dmund Berggren (2456 White Bear Avenue), Je Crew (2462 White Bear Avenue), arrel Berkowitz (2428 White Bear Av ue), Zelma Pitz1(2005 Castle Avenue), dd Thomas (2Q31 9th Avenue E.), d other residents of the area spoke in favor of e project. CoFTmeer Toner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission reco nd, contingent on an ed traffic agreement by the Ramsey County Engineer, the plewood City E and the developer,: A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan from LBCNimited business commercial), R -1 (single dwellings) and NC (neighborhood r -3 MEMORANDUM TO FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Sign Size Variance Maplewood 11 Movies Pylon Sign 1793 Beam Avenue November 10, 1994 INTRODUCTION AC1tion b7i C'ounoil;, I 116difiedm"M Bel ecte .. Date Ben Lindberg is requesting a 34- square -foot sign size variance for United Artists Theaters. Mr. Lindberg is representing Leroy Signs, Inc. He is proposing this sign expansion for the Maplewood II movie theater at 1793 Bean Avenue. (See the location and property line maps on pages 5 and 6.) Mr. Lindberg is proposing to add one -foot, ten - inches of sign height to the existing pylon sign. The proposed. addition would increase the sign's area from 286 square feet to 334 square feet. This is an addition of 48 square feet. The City Code allows a mum of 300 square feet. (See the proposed Sign ul awing on page 7.) ; BACKGROUND On September 23, 1980, the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) approved the design plans for this theater. Condition 13 required compliance with the sign ordinance. DISCUSSION There is no justification for this variance. State law requires that, to grant a variance, the City Council must fund that strict enforcement would cause United Artists "undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property." There are no such circumstances here. The applicant simply wants more sign area than the Code allows. The applicant has stated, in his letter that "the reason for this size increase is to display a larger letter size to identify this facility to the automobile traffic on Beam Avenue." (See the applicant's letter on page 9.) It is true that the "United Artists - Maplewood II" sign copy cannot be read as easily as one gets further away from the sign. However, this is true of all signs. The applicant could enlarge the sign height by six inches to get the maximum area allowed and expand the sign copy within this panel or he could redesign the panel to use all of the blank space. These options would not need a variance. The applicant has large easily -read wall - mounted signs on the theater. These clearly identify the theater as a United Artists theater from distances where the copy on the pylon sign is hard to read. In 1993, United Artists put up their sign for the Maplewood I movie theater. This sign advertises six screens and is only 173 square feet. (See the drawing on page 8.) RECOMMENDATION Deny the request for a 34- square -foot sign size variance for the Maplewood II United Artists theater at 1793 Beam Avenue, on the basis that: 1 Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not .cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. The applicant's sign copy dilemma is due to the sign's design and not due to unique circumstances with the property. 2. The United Artists sign for Maplewood I movie theater advertises six screens and is only 173 square feet. 3 The applicant could enlarge the sign copy and stay within the size limits required by the Code. 2 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 4.41 acres Existing land use: Maplewood H Movie Theater SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Maplewood Mall South: Beam Avenue and Chili's Restaurant West :. Southlawn Drive and the Olive Garden Restaurant East: Maplewood Mall parking lot PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business and commercial) Zoning: BC (business commercial) Ordinance requirements Section 36- 351(2) allows the maximum area of a freestanding sign of 300 square feet if the lot size exceeds one acre. Findings for Variance Approval State law requires that the City Council make the following g ppfindingstoapprove a variance from the zoning code: 1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. 2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Undue hardship ", as used in granting a variance, means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of thepg landowner s due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship f reasonable use for the roe exists under thepproperty y terms of the ordinance. 3 p :sec2n/movies. var Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Lane /Zoning Map 3. Sign Sketch — Maplewood H Theater 4. Sign Sketch -- Maplewood I Theater 5. Applicant's letter dated September 21, 1994 ATTACHMENT 1 IDWS HE7G COUNTY ROAD D COUNTY RD. D WOODLYNN iii to J I G E.; W Z 4 S 1. , o LYDIA a V 2• 2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. 3. • 3. DULUTH CT. 8 py Y o G 0 4. LYDIA ST. ho S z 19 BEAM AVE. BEAM JA 19 ID 9 uAPLE 1 A © - •• W + N W W COUNTY COURT KOHL MAN AVE. iii W KHUrtAN Z 1 W AVM 1NTY ROAD C w 'c ew S W , ` •+ m EDGEHILL RD. • CO ' J NOR a ...., AVE. DEMONT AVE. m - -j 6ROOKS .fit •"' o AVE. BROOKS . _ ' a CL. dop • EL'S,AVE • . win SEX TANT Z l a AVE. I c !% .• w o .. GERVAIS AVE. y . GERMS ° GERVAIS GERVAIS AVE. ••. CT.GRANDVIEW AVE.. 44 VIKING OR. CASn -E AVE -- R36 SHERREN AVM. CASTLE AVE. F Kn d Lake fir,'•• - 0 COPE - AVE. COPE AVE LARK CT. C7 to LARK -j _ AVE. AVE. IL LAURIE , •. RD. SAN ul n CO. RD. • totr on ., _ t t tptc P on ' ' LOCATION MAP Q N 5 t9 001.o 3 4w m N o - (4O 7. Oro ac ' • ' • N h i- N m ¢ i LOT -7 BLK.-. :. bqD MAPLEWOOD MALL 4n McDONALDS w.. TOTAL = B, we . 1 . 14.00 .. . m q l5= s.89'1 &'2S_ 300. Z Z.4 ?wt. ' 3 LOV8 a, z LKr UNITED ARTISTS THEATRE Sao OLIVE GARDEN 243.4 • .. do .PYLON SIGN 160 'Goc._No. 1 588 .tb. oPEiV 41 a AV &'o Lr-% IV#Oroc.'9 twrolp Z ? TAKEN FOR BEAM A%jc. CT F1LE'rio x•2.71 N 434 53 Sao• )oo' 1 too' 100 too 100 loo lio* sa CHILLS _2 80 -_° MEDICAL CLINIC : ssn ? N aZ 3 r r l 0 .76 ac .84 ac. O2.21 ac. 4i533, 000 " fin Q M N T * 'p • T Z co v N • ,+ v h o h (@) (3) 0 ) PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 6 4 N Z 6' ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED SIGN WITH 1 FOOT,10INCHES OF ADDiTIONAL HEIGHT PROPOSED SIGN W CL tft vll i 00 J DOUBLE FACE DISPLAY T -12 ILLUMINATION fi 44 , p S 7NATEK. r> r - : • : - zs,gn is the exclusive propert} of c;oFdon Sign 'ornorl ant; ca( - !no[ be eproduced either in whole or r dart +.ttlcv their written consent V44 dam E 1J8' THICK ALUMINIUM FACT S 1 s ROUT COPY ANO LOQO OUT OF RACKGROUNO OVERLAY WHfTE PLEX• WITH GOLD PERFORATED ALUMINIUM AND BACK UP SOUT) PAINT FACES POLYURETHANE SATIN fhit$N BLA OVERLAY REVEALS wrTH BRIGHT GOLD ALUM CUEW• ADOMS: DATE Sao ScNE: 141ta-1 1, oaAwni BY. sMont: i A WHITE POL FACES z > B WffH ZIP- CHANGE COPY jei1 Ir''!- EiC11•U Sjtfi.}I E'5• • Ca L!t!.'fs. 1& m i Gno"''4r•G•'f'j+12Z7! w 05 Fort 011611H tfs ,• N ALUMINIUM CANNETWITH RO ED ALUMINUM ENDS PAINT SATIN FINISH POLYUAETHAN BLACK MCI ~ O,b Avenue Oonvor. cororcao 01VIOER 8J1A • PAINT iNNtTE SEE ORAWING 0 2S222.322" FOR DETAILS OVERLA REVEALS WrTH BAIG GOLD ALUMINUM FABAICATEO ALUMINKIM BASE WITH RQLLED ALUMINIUM ENDS PAINT POLYU R ETHANE SATtV fi NtSH" 6LlCK j ;; ( 1 j '# 1 j m1'11pullx' • J DOUBLE FACE DISPLAY T -12 ILLUMINATION fi 44 , p S 7NATEK. r> r - : • : - zs,gn is the exclusive propert} of c;oFdon Sign 'ornorl ant; ca( - !no[ be eproduced either in whole or r dart +.ttlcv their written consent V44 dam E 1J8' THICK ALUMINIUM FACT S 1 s ROUT COPY ANO LOQO OUT OF RACKGROUNO OVERLAY WHfTE PLEX• WITH GOLD PERFORATED ALUMINIUM AND BACK UP SOUT) PAINT FACES POLYURETHANE SATIN fhit$N BLA OVERLAY REVEALS wrTH BRIGHT GOLD ALUM CUEW• ADOMS: DATE Sao ScNE: 141ta-1 1, oaAwni BY. sMont: DRAWING NUMBER 27?•w - 3 % f C7 3 m Z Gordon aN! MCI ~ O,b Avenue Oonvor. cororcao DRAWING NUMBER 27?•w - 3 % September 21, 1994 Cit of Maplewood 1830 E. Count Road "B" United Artists Maplewood,, MN 55109 RE: Maplewood II Attn: Geoff Olson, 1793 Beam AvenueDir,, of Communit Developmnt Maplewpod . MN Dear Mr. Olson: Please accept this let S" as a re b Gordon Sign Co and LeroyIgns,, IncInc., for a variance to 'increase the size of the Maplew II p si We propose to increase the size of the t9P cabinet fran 2'81' x 261011to416" x 261011 thereb increa *sin the siz of the p si frcrn286squarefeetto334Alsquarefeet, The si code allows a maximxxnof300sfeetso, in effect we ar ask n 34 s feet, i for an additional The reason for this increase in size is to displa c - 1 lar lettersizetoidentifthisfacilitytotheautomobiletraonBeamAvenueTheexistintopsicabinetdoesnothaveenouheitoaccomplishthis, The photo surve I have included will show " the "United Artists"let cannot be read fran 3001, 2001 or even 100'. In fact r youwould. be almost passi the si before you are able to ide the name of this Theatre. We believe this sli increase in size would not alter the essentialCharacteroftheareaandbecausewewillmaintaithe-sarre 9, COPYIlightinandconfiguration,, it should be in keepin with the spiritandintentoftheordinance, Respectfull Ben .. Lindber cc: Steve Youle MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD. MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 22, 1994 I. .CALL TO ORDER irperson Erickson called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. I.I. ROLL`CALL Marvin Erickson Present BruceThompso Present Marie Robinson Absent Roger Anitzberger Present Ananth Vidyashankaz Present 111. APPROVAL OF MINUTE There were no minutes. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Boardmember Tho,fpson moved approval of 6q agenda as submitted. Boardmember"'Anitzberger seconded. V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ere was no unfinished business. VI. DESIGN REVIEW A. Sign Size Variance -- Maplewood H Movies, 1793 Beam Avenue Steve Eull of Gordon Sign Company (Denver), the national sign contractor for United Artists, said United Artists has an ongoing, nationwide program of building and renovating theaters. This includes updating the signs with a new starburst logo which requires taller letters (a 3:1 ratio) and, therefore, a bigger top on the sign. Mr. Eull also said the letters on the building are not very visible and create a hardship in identifying the theater. Tim Hinsen, the district manager for United Artists, commented on the various changes in movie theaters and how the new sign complemented the local upgrading. Some Board members felt particular movies attracted consumers, not the theater name. I Community Design Review Board Minutes of 11 -22 -94 2- Boardmember Thompson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend denial of the request for a 34- square -foot sign variance for the Maplewood II United Artists theater at 1793 Beam Avenue, on the basis that: 1. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property under consideration. The applicant's sign copy dilemma is due to the sign's design and not due to unique circumstances with the property. 2. The United Artists sign for Maplewood I movie theater advertises six screens and is only 173 square feet. 3. The applicant could enlarge the sign copy and stay within the size limits required by the Code. Boardmenmber Anitzberger seconded. Ayes —all B. wilding Addition--Edgerton Elementary School, 1929 Edgerton Street Dian` Bellgowan and Dick Daniels., of RSP Architects, explained the reasons r the revision ' the laps and described 'p d s d the changes. Mr. Darnels said the scho district was recei ' g funds from the City of Maplewood and would use the m in partnership the school. Ms. Bellgowan also said they would us clayacla -like, S- by 16- : inch ctural brick that would closely match the e ' ting brick and all of the windows in the lding will also be replaced. There ould be one piece of roof- top equipment over cafeteria area. Commissioner Thompson *ved the Commyrfity Design Review Board recommend: D. Approval of the plans stamp d figust 29, 1994 for the Edgerton Elementary School expansion. The folio conditions apply: 1. This approvals ersedes the evious plan approval of March 28, 1994. . 2. Repeat 's review in two years if .City has not issued a building permit for 'project. 3. Submit the following for staff approval befdr the City issues a building permit: a. A revised site plan showing the following: 1) Striping for ninety- degree parking east o%thes striping. AGENDA N0. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager G5W(4 M"AiU' RE: PURCHASE OF OPEN SPACE -SITE #153A (PRIORY) DATE: December 12, 1994 INTRODUCTION Lotion by; Council Modified, e,ee Date . At the October 24 meeting, the City Council referred the purchase of Open Space Site 153A to the Parks &Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission for review. The proposed acquisition is back before the City Council for consideration. BACKGROUND Last November, the citizens of Maplewood approved the $5 million bond referendum for the acquisition of open space. This is the fourth property to come before the City Council for consideration. The property, Site ##153A, is located south of Larpenteur Avenue and west of Centu Avenue. A location map is part of Community Development's memorandum. The total purchase price of the 39 ares is $1,200,000. The negotiations for this property were handled by the Trust For Public Land. Ms. Peg Kohring, representing TPL, feels that the site contains excellent examples of wetlands, oak stands, and prairie. TPL coordinated a Phase I environmental study of the site. That study stated that there is a high probability hat the bedrock layer andYY groundwater associated with it could have been contaminated by a 3M dump. Materials from that dump have probably migrated to the Priory site. This situation onl impacts the site if a well were drilled to the bedrock layer and used for drinking water. The State is aware of the problem, and one of the monitoring wells is located on Century Avenue in the right -of -way. There are no other indications of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site. There is a well on the property which will be sealed b the Priory. In addition alyry I debris will be removed from the site before a possible closing. Commissions Review The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 5 to consider whether the proposed acquisition follows the Comprehensive Plan. The land use plan changes would be from R -3(M) (multiple dwellings - medium density), R -1 (single dwellings), OS (open space) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to OS and R -1. The Planning Commission voted unanimously that if the City purchased the site, the land use plan should be changed to reflect the open space designation. Geoff Olson's staff report is a separate part of this agenda item. The Parks &Recreation Commission reviewed the acquisition on September 19. A copy of their report is attached. The consensus of the Parks Commission was that the site has several advantages as open space including size, location and relationship to Jim's Prairie. Progress Report On Other Open Space Sites Site Number Location Acres Price 142 English /Frost 24 $827,000 Status: City closed on the property on December 1. 140 Trail Heads near #142 1.6 $80,000 Status: City Council requested that Park money be used for purchase. 103C County Road D/Woodlynn 23 $655,000Status: Under consideration. 153A Priory, Century /Larpenteur 39 $112001000 Status: Under consideration. TOTAL 88 $2l762 2 Possible purchases currently being negotiated. 173 South end, Bonsell 38.5 Status: Offer has been made by City. 108 Pearson, Hazelwd /Beam 7.5 Status: Owner is ordering his own appraisal. 151 County Rd. B /Rice 17 -29 Status: Joint project with I.S.D. 624 and 623 being considered. 116 Spoon Lake, Mapleleaf Dev. ?32 Status: Negotiations with owners continue. 16113 South of Linwood, Kayser ?30 Status: Currently being appraised. An estimate of the total purchase price for these five properties is $1.7 million to $2.9 million. Expenses for the acquisition program are estimated at $300,000 which includes studies, appraisals, legal fees, and taxes. This leaves approximately $4.7 million for land costs. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider the purchase of Open Space Site 153A and if they decide to acquire it: 1) direct staff to take the appropriate actions to close; and 2) adopt the attached resolution. This resolution changes the land use plan for Site #153A to OS (open space) and R -1 (single dwellings) and drops Hoyt Avenue between Sterling Street and Century Avenue as a collector street upon closing. 3 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development .is proposing a change to the City's land use plan. The change is from R -3(M) (multiple dwellings— medium density), OS (open space) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to OS (open space) and R -1 (single dwellings) and to drop Hoyt Avenue between Sterling Street and Century Avenue as a collector street. WB EREAS this Ppchangeapplies to the area south of Larpenteur Avenue and west of Century Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On December 5, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surroundingpg property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speakpY and p resent written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment. 2. On the City Council discussed this land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commissionon and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described changes for the following reasons: 1. The City plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The City's Open Space Committee ranked this site first out of the 67 sites they studied. 3. This site would expand the open space corridor that the City has planned in this area. 4. The purchase would preserve a variety of natural features on this site, including upland grass and a wetland. 5. Neither the City or property owner to the south plan to build Hoyt Avenue as a collector street. The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1994. MEMORANDUM To: Gretchen Ma li h, ity anager From: Bruce K. Ande 31 a of P rks & Recreation Subj : Open Space Site Date: December 7, 199 For December 19, 1994, City Council Meeting Introduction The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the possible acquisition of Open Space Site 153A at their regular scheduled meeting on September 19, 1994. The Park Commission has reviewed each of the Open Space parcels from a Parks and Recreation perspective and have not specifically made a motion regarding prioritization of the sites and specific acquisition recommendations, but rather it has been their intent to provide issues for City Council consideration. Background Open Space Site 153A is more commonly referred to as the Priory property totaling 39 acres. The Park and Recreation Commission raised the following issues regarding the possible ac quisi- tion of this property: 1. The site would provide an excellent connecting link to Jim's Prairie, which is a 3 acre site of undisturbed natural prairie land. Jim's Prairie currently has poor access and does not have anyY type of relationship to existing Park and /or Open Space. 2. The Priory property could serve as a ood piece of property for Outreach Programs for thegpppYg Maplewood Nature Center. 3. The site has excellent accessibility with access off of both Century and Larpenteur Avenues. 4. Site 153A is currently a Study Area for Park and Open Space Systems within the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan. 5. The site has outstanding vegetation and topographic relief. The Park and Recreation Commission felt that the strongest advantage to the possible acquisition of this site would be its relationship to Jim's Prairie and use by the Maplewood Nature Center for Outreach Programs. Recommendation The Park and Recreation Commission general consensus was that the Priory property, due its size, location and relationship to Jim's Prairie, had advantages as an Open Space site. Staff would concur with the recommendations as outlined by the Park and Recreation Commission. 10: 05. FPOU-1 TPL-114.1RO tr SEP '---'C, 194 00 TO 82-771-71450t'---. P H" 15 E - 0 C. n. o Iti CL 0 C> z 0 Ir9Z,0 uj V UJ Ci LJ Low" awart-m -t 9CCWYPAOM Ie* Plat Map REG I CIt - lHL Hi_I I T HDt•-1 I t•..l . TEL f , 1.'' -'' i, 1' Li r 1 -.' ' ^+ 1 c 1 •i . i iiii= F' r. Maplewood Open Space Committee December 12, 1994 Y DEC 1 21994 y 7 9 0 Maplewood City ColtllCll Maplewood City Hall 1830 E. County Rd. B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Council Members: The council will decide tonight whether tO purchase two parcels of land for the oj)en space program: number 15:3A (the Priory property), and number 1030 (Co.. Rd. D and Woodlyn). I'lie Maplewood Open Space; Con eIIC0LIrages YOU to purchase number 1 IA (th Priory property). Because of conflicts of interest, we are not making a rec.onimendation can ntttllbCr• 103C" (Co. R D and Woodlyn). Thank you for taking the dme to - read this letter. Since Dominic Ramaeier, Chairman 865 Uakewood Dr, S. Maplewood, MN 55119 w) 290 -3722, 0) 73-1-1416 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Change —Open Space Site #153A LOCATION: Southwest Corner of Larpenteur and Century Avenues (Priory Property) DATE: November 30, 1994 INTRODUCTION The City Council directed the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission to review the purchase of a property for open space. Maplewood's Open Space Committee has numbered this site 153A. It comprises 39 acres that are south of Larpenteur Avenue and west of Century Avenue. (See the .maps on pages 3 and 4.) The City staff has negotiated a price of 1 ,200,000. State law requires that the Planning Commission advise the Council whether proposed public acquisitions follow the Comprehensive Plan. The City has not shown all this site on the land use plan for open space, so we have scheduled a public hearing to consider changing the land use plan.: The changes would be from R -3(M) (multiple dwellings — medium density), R -1 (single dwellings), OS (open space) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to OS and R -1. (See the maps on pages 7 and 8.) The staff is recommending that the City drop Hoyt Avenue between Sterling Street and Century Avenue as a collector street on the land use plan. Neither the City nor the property owner to the south plan to build Hoyt Avenue as a collector street. BACKGROUND On November 2, 1993, the voters approved the open space referendum. The voters authorized the City to sell up to $5 million in general obligation bonds to purchase land for open space. The Open Space Committee recommended that the City Council consider buying open space from a list of nineteen sites. The list included the fourteen top -rated sites in Maplewood and five additional sites that the Committee has rated top in their respective neighborhoods, but not City- wide. Since then, the City has narrowed the list to nine properties. (See the list on page 5 and the map on page 6.) These are the properties that the owners have expressed an interest in selling. The .City Council has authorized the staff to negotiate the purchase of one of these sites -Site 142 (Frost Avenue and English Street). The City should close on this site by December 1, 1994. On September 19, 1994, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the purchase of Site 1 SM. They made the following observations The site would be a connecting link to Jim's Prairie. The site would have advantages to the Nature Center for outreach rop ams. ' The site would have good accessibility. The Comprehensive Plan includes this site in a study area for a new neighborhood ark.g p RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution . on page 9. This resolution changes the land use plan for the area south of Larpenteur Avenue and west of Century Avenue. The changes are from R -3M (residential medium density), R -1 (single dwellings), OS (open space) and M -1 (light. manufacturing) to OS open space) and R -1 (single dwellings). This resolution also drops Hoyt Avenue as a collector street between Sterling Street and Century Avenue. The City should make these changes because: 1. The City plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The City's Open Space Committee ranked this site first out of the 67 sites they studied. 3. This site would expand the open space corridor that the City has planned in this area. 4. The purchase would preserve a variety of natural features on this site, including upland grass and a wetland. 5. Neither the City or property owner to the south plan to build Hoyt Avenue as a collector street. The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property. p: sec24- 29 /openlan3.gwo Attachments: 1. Location Map -Site 153A 2. Property Line /Zoning Map -Site 153A 3. List of Top -Rated Sites 4. Map of Top -Rated Sites 5. Existing Land Use Map -Site 153A 6. Proposed Land Use Map -Site 153A 7. Land Use Plan Change Resolution 2 Attachment 1 own 1. MARYJOE Lk 2. 7IERNEY AVE• 3 MEADOW DR. RIPLFY AVE. NORTH SAINT PAUL f .; ., •.•• • • • • :: r •• .... •t 0 1% 0. . • ••, •• `• • , • •• •NOIl OwAY • AVE. + f 68 • Q ' • , , POP* '' •00s, KNOLL CIR. rw* ••, 5 s • • R! PLFY AV t9 A%fE 0 t; MC*4k>ff tJr ANC ••' t4j LARPEN"MUR * oflipilliplill11,11191111 y91TS ::: TT.:•TTT ••T.• •.•• . • ;:•: :F --- v • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 • S• TT• YS ;'YTT•••••4•:•:•••:YTTS•TTT1T. • 04IDAHO ......... .' ...... . . • T • :=.'BLS • T,.Tll if •';:•:•:•:• :•:: • • • , Oso so 7 o* pk MowANiA AVE. ees W slow o s CK • D 1 MICHAM DRV •' • 2 REBECCA OR NEBRASKA J AVE. . ° *-3 PINETREE DR 3 4 •" 4 8tA'CFMEW DR2 • 1440N so UA qA go OAMU Cr r airs•, AIVGElIt CT 0 . 'S PINE TREE DR h'oir4. '6 SIRCHMEW DR S 6 7 ; 6 •'7 ROLUNC HILLS OR 8 •oAVE. cr .. Co"m U 1 ANfEU?PE WAY so 4 00WAT to a v. o S COUGER 'WWTHORNE AVE • soE. MARYLAND o AVE. : t • 120ON AVE ' G GEPAN ..; f • MACNOLJA AVE• O r- LOCATION MAP 3 4 N Attachment 2 HILL—MURRAY PRIORY A I I rZAPPENTIEURAVENUE. r-% V &.0 _7 14)7 tni 4 3 2 2580 F 93.0' 14 1.111 : . .; . ; *X FD ------------- .. . . " 151213 610 MN to I RS. $00AVE XIN .. . . • IDAHO M0.144 - 41 X-M.; r 1111, 100-0 x .. n . ........0 Lo 7 6 . . . . . .5 1 ig. x HS"AS 04 .Z - v" Ke.wt 5.4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Xvi • lllv xi 100. l O PROPOSED OAK RIDGE DEVELOPMENT R1 0 r , Jdl R3 Z D 0 U u Iv Z O Z 7 3 U) PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP OPEN SPACE SITE *153A 4 Attachment 3 TOP NINE OPEN SPACE SITES FROM THE OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDED OPEN SPACE UST 5 Open Space City ID#67 Sites Property Location –Owner Acres Estimated Cost 153A 1 Priory 39 1 151 6 East of Rice, South of B-- Zittel & Oren 29 142 6 English and Frost 24 827,000 161B 6 South of Linwood Ave., East of Sterling St.-30 Kayser 108 9 Hazelwood and Beam Pearson 8 116 13 Near Spoon Lake— Kuslich & Pillsbury 32 173 21 Sterling, south of Carver 40 140 38 Crossing of Trails, N. of Frost on English 2 80 103C 57 Between County Road .D and woodlynn 23 655,000 Total estimate to buy these four sites is $1.7. million Appraisels being done, but may be difficult to acquire because of legal complications. 5 RONAttachment 4 w d. rr 132 FrAl 453A 1538 156 --- rlifM a a 1598 Maplewood OPEN SPACE Top Rated Areas THE TOP SITES ARE CIRCLED 159A 161 160 618 161A Eel e,- Attachment 5 Ce l1IIt1 1 ®";= " s E •- NO North St. Paul,Roadmom CO jor collector 1 Y _ .,w«.ff rM ' ' -' f ITSpu iil Tate,: tea• .. ,, "`" REVISED j e c Kni 4 N 7 Attachment 6 11 Nil oIP;_ Larpenteur ma arterial REVISED 06/22/93 E R -3(M) R — ° NOON" tiff :' M -1 os > . c sic' "T Ic Knight HILLSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 8 PROPOSED) 4 N 3' LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION Attachment 7 WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development is proposing a change to the City's land use plan. The change is from R -3M (multiple dwellings — medium density), OS (open space) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to OS (open space) and R -1 (single dwellings) and to drop Hoyt Avenue between Sterling Street and Century Avenue as a collector street. VvTEREAS, this change applies to the area south of Larpenteur Avenue and west of Century Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On December 5, 1994, the Planning Commssion held a public hearing. The City staff published a hearing notice. in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment. 2. On _ , the City Council discussed this land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described changes for the following reasons: 1. The City plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The City's Open Space Committee ranked this site first out of the 67 sites they studied. 3. This site would expand the open space corridor that the City has planned in this area. 4. The purchase would preserve a variety of natural features on this site, including upland grass and a wetland. 5. Neither the City or property owner to the south plan to build Hoyt Avenue as a collector street. The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on ) 1994. a Planning Commission Minutes of 12 -05 -94 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Land Use Plan Change- --Open Space Site 153A enteCarpur and Century Avenues) Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, read the hear' 'hearing notice, presented the staff report,and answered questions from the Commission. Char Brooker 2172 woodlynnAvenue, spoke for the Open Space Committee. The public hearing was opened for comments. Pe Kohrin 1 'Peg g, 940 Wisconsin Avenue North in Golden Valley, showed pictures of the roe andpprty commented on its beauty. There were no further comments, so the ublic hearing wpgas closed. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of theresolutionwhichchangesthelanduseplanfortheareasouthofLarpenteurAvenueandwestofCenturyAvenue. The changes are from R -3M (residential medium density), R -1 (single dwellings), OS (open space) and M -1 (light manufacturing) toOS (open space) and R -1 (single dwellings). This resolution also drops Hoyt Avenue as a collector street between Sterling. Street and Century Avenue. The City shouldmakethesechangesbecause: 1. The City plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The City's Open Space Committee ranked this site first out of thee 67 sites theystudied. 3. This site would expand the open space corridor that the City has planned. 4. The purchase would preserve a variety of natural features on this site, includinguplandgrassandawetland. 5. Neither the City or property owner to the south plan to build Hoyt Avenue as a collector street. The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property. Commissioner Martin seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. r Land Use Plan n space Site 103C (County Road D)was scheduled for 7:2 fission moved ahead to 8.a., Commission Presentatio vember 28 Council Mee mis sioner Kittridge reported on this MEMORANDUM TO:City Manager FROM:Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT:Final Plat PROJECT:Caves English Street Third Addition LOCATION:McAfee Circle and County Road BDATE:December 13, 1994 INTRODUCTION Ac tion by, Council dors Moth Ddi 14ki Samuel Cave is requesting that the City Council approve Caves English Street Third Additionfinalplat. Mr. Cave represents Cave and Associates, Ltd. This final plat would create ten lots forhousesandoneoutlotforapondingarea. The plat is south of County Road B across fromMcAfeeCircleandeastofEnglishStreet. (See the maps on pages 3 and 4 and the proposed finalplatonpage5.) BACKGROUND On August 22, 1994, the City Council approved a drainage and utility easement vacation and apreliminaryplatfortenlotsforCavesEnglishStreetThirdAddition. (Seethe preliminary plat on 1 page 6 and the. minutes starting on page 7.) DISCUSSION Cave and Associates have not yet started building this project. However, the developer and Citystaffwanttosatisfythejudgepresidingoverthiscasebygettingfinalplatapproval. Thepreliminaryplatconditionsrequirethatthedevelopersubmitaletterofcreditorafinancial guarantee for the unfinished public improvements before approving a final plat. The developerhasnotyetdonethis. Mr. Cave wants to submit the financial guarantee to the City in the springbeforestartingconstruction. He has met all the other conditions that the Council required toapprovethefinalplat. RECOMMENDATION Approve Caves English Street Third Addition final lat. Approval i s subject to the followingconditions:following 1. The County recording the deed restrictions, covenants and deeds required by the City. The wording of these documents shall be subj ect to staff approval. 2. The staff shall not release the plat for recording ntil the developer does the followingp .g a. Satisfies all the preliminary plat conditions, including the letter of credit or other financial guarantee for the public improvements. b. Submits the final copies of the required deeds, deed restrictions and covenants to the staff for review before taking them to the County with the plat. p: sec 10- 29 /engl3fin. gwo Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Final Plat 4. Preliminary Plat 5. 8-22 -94 Council minutes P Attachment 1 w+ CN- 12 OR DEMOtT r AVM. o cc S o IEAV F Z EDGEHILL DEMIONT AVE m ROOKS AVE C 9R00KS tg AVE. Mt; SEX T I }ii .as. 4-v J GER1//1!S AVE. } GER1//11S I . CRANMEW AVE. PK*y VIKING DR. 5%IERREN AVE K„ Loki COPE AVE. LAW GT. to AVE \J WiK i AVE. K4w E . CO. R0 H = WJRfE RD. LAURIE RD. LELAND SAN URST AVE. f JUNC'TfON b 8 n CO. RD. J ( 1) CWWBERS ST AVE. ; 6UR10E AVE. oURKE AVE C UR SCE AVE. Q C i ,VE. oELA10NT AVE GOL SKN.L AV E. l.6AM1 AVE. HARRIS AVE. ROSEWOOD AVE N. 0 w Av. AvE. S. 11viL—Sri i c Qty tosT vEZl Q S n WW AVE. AVE N 3 AV 3U FR SBtE AVE.- RtP LAY SO PH IA as q Cl id PH A ST. q *' too 4 , o < O Attachments c X140. *0b AVE. U 1, ( t ?,o 1 1 ti t L' ' Z.i; 26 ZO r ?93r •w U I 1 i 1 1 + 1 I' i joE '151 1 '1! + :rt+ j as i I JNS 14 ( 140 (Hb) 1 621) 1(ts6) AZT E . 4( ! 1 6 17 1 sYro z3'1' IS Yz, i 07 t TEO 232 LinIa LAP-M t: r w bn s s 1 toNc 13•j; 111 I , 7 W V/ a j3 t4 If K 17 y 1! ><O ti At t3 24 1S tR 1 laol +04 C4 N N _ 2217. eI z , ar., 14 t ,• s t '.: "' _ r n is . .•. _ 41 p 216 p . d M N r h M 4O A; - - - - - 22 0 C 1 ; .- g. . g 223 f N , OA v 7 `v 1t- _ _ 1 7 40 40' 70 .I •a c t ' Q . 221 0 2 z H 1.,2 y . r . 4 z ' 4 g 204 J I 6' 7 I f 1" 6 1 t_ t M is /t `tt f 3 >t 1 = G MR LL 40 { ' I 22011is; K I is 11 I It! 101 8 s 1 20 r !f !G t7 is n so s is is s4 t y s) I Cb)i iC) I (LS N _ • .,x) I am) fti A-0 AO 40 40 40 ' 1 40 « w • . •. .' ..'. 7t .r .. r• n .r u N t 2191. ELAND ROAD A .`•'•'••' • 2181 AZJ v 1 - 2181 ••'''::;l'/ POND Ib H i ! v , to ` :;:; ,. ;. N ' •:,,,,;;, ,,,,,,,••.. :.,,::...•.,,.,•.•.. : is 14 1 I a • 21$0 •,: ,,..;.,• i : . ,. 2173 2174 ''''' '••''•• ' 15 1 Isj Iz 111 2108 2); 1(j I 106 lasp . . 2 16 5 as .. , .,. I 212 ..iA. •.• . >: t:;,:4:.. : JUNCTION so•43 3e. ; : ' ' r 2155 r 2156 sAll t• i` fly !t ti to tl tt !a 14. IND SCHOO 04T. N0.4 O p s 4 3 n 11 1 S ID 17 '' ':: ' 13 " '11 11 a - 4 1 s (L I6 +. 1aA_31__1__1_ _1_ 1 . ._l. !. 1_ t VACA"rtD ••• =.tf _ia - .et i3s 'tit s.is'ssT1 - - t ,W-Q- T - r T - leg of 4 Tf40 11.'t? 1 P! 1 l j 1 I 11 131 t4 1 li 114 iT 1 td !s ti'd zoo 0 ` • n I IS 1 l I tD 1 L Z.i 4.' 12i 12l ?AIts I , 31 at I3'! ! I'1 so J`O I TCa i• K a.. 1 »say t }. OI101 ! ei (!!: 14 (3 •R, I f• ' 1d 1? I P 14 13 It 11 110 9 8 T • 5 4 13 1 L 1 li 1 L J .1_ _ VACAT[D i • oe liTTlff ir __K 1r It is H is 1i 17 1e r . w eo I t1 tt i a OF t :.j 2s L q sa >y 30 jai I t I I17 I11 1 1 1f1r .,IC • 1 ` 1 ae1,.14f Z 1Q > i L =1- _•`__ •' ' ivi,Cwt o7 ! - s ' L flit sTSt• v4cAT9 lb 7i t A K SR1 2.49 At . Ter.1. 1 8 T r c s Ni to9i. - tb ' 1) l/ lS) R' (5 . 16 s!5s, ;fie 45 (10) h) (141 1c15) 14 I IS .1fr 1 r? lb to . . I . 0 t tack BE LM ONT ' SITE PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4 Q N Attad7nent 3 rd own: CAVES ENGLER STBT w tll wna tt.r atiw • a..ratim two. • .r wNl+rr r 6. • Iir ! rr irr M 1 rrl/M M + Mwlr a.wu Ilwrr +Iwa a r GNP M rwwa' M *IIAr IYnnr ` 1. am I1r.Mrtr a MM 1 . Mr r 1 tm No00amooft ri«i =. J.- s M. ft r err MLA MIrrr ar In• aoalalwu ". • rr dommem Got aft or Nlb M Vi. • NmmoA am now ` Vona r r far Of Is power aftor "a ft 46 a soft MOM a min; amen Qlali r a t - n. R M j ! • • ` .a%: or or .rIia cir.t` lLiw, i , i ' ; rte . \ ` : ' lb rM+rt trrl..r sr. `N.NIr Noma ow allomirm .1 HAM itil _'_ ,_, tlMr•E i1 - -- •. r±sr S r _ ^`. \ dbh so w 1 r.. fJM•a r do~ • • SW • folSIM ar•n r `1........i.r M... •00 to r .r t.l.1.a1. M • urn t >I r u .•.Mr'rw w.. f a err • one" fnr ar •rrr. i }- 1 : ._ , • J r trrrNt r w r "a 406 rem w r it am. 40 Mrw r M OW a ! ia. -_ JJIGl.'lC i _ _ - ! _ - • t t 46 allN.r allrr . III+t ! .. = • . Ir' _ • 1 C. l 4. l• a Irl1 *Memo No4rr ' I/r w M M..r.r I •: • 1 11 r 11`. I ate. r r • IMN 1Nr fAl. • it AawrMMAso1144" N1' • rMID r! ANL.. i : r.. ' . , Na1 N !w Nl rfA •Ilf i rM N /M 4 • / i w+ NafaL Mar t. . l I .. • ' .. . • - • / ftow poem a s+ S r • a n `r rr wrMar son am a a* tea. { s s I / i i ' ^ $ ' sawsoWsnow a11re 1 ! K" It'Or E • ar «• t • I / Aramam s71MfilT a ar Man n ONNO.. tlr dit ttnr. » MUM *tr UM IN Ilm amomm ff r 1 w.•+ 100, rriii 'f 1CALS DI ;FLT I .rw.,•r ,. r..w ati.rr 1 rolr • w 1 CAB.. .•: I. ' 1' am" mmM M0040 u/rmNaaWMWm•natnIrrtop ...f.T•.t' l: ,M:..: l l? 4 1 rrrr a of an, •lb r ab *1r_ a11Es I raniwl .rr , 14 IWArlw- IsI + VW* f 1IlrtSWOOMtOptimbaftba PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 5 4 N CAVES ENGLISH THIRD ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT d• . "i C, r' . rte 16 U 4J C f ... ouitOi O • c! 12,200 S.F. riRCRltTIOM or Ro"M ••% i 1 i f f r; qpLot • AIOct : Co... "el•.b Ww NtAOM rwat«. LELANDA..ft.r twurr • wswMMS. ... -G- ressam ssssacss • i$ 10;00@'Sf, as ao FEST ra1R- Tarr r G + 1 10.000 SF. g, .. u - , e rtc: s:rc TAP: •oar.@* a. RM••: 3" OF L9? Xv?v Ir" Rtal titR: R10lurtRla aass or 3•on • to.oa sanAne oset „ R ..e 2 > ssraL s+rassa or SINGLE n rstto • to M i M Z 10.020 S.F. . I vnagt tot A29A 3 i0 t . 1 : 1tZOO ss.FT- VAL ARt • 4.2 AM { ` , % Asta or scours • .T scot I rtr eta • s.! ACNE s 1° MRLOT AOta • .• Apt + 0 2 3 IX , •". NMGf r7 rasa \ T ".• so li 2165 -- 2162 1 t JUNCTION no 21.56 i 1 j • 5 f 6 x • fF MIDWFST .. t .. Land M Cme NOW /Ikff & C1vI E/lak ws, kM fflarARIp,11r Nltlt . flU. Ntilii11i1 IYt NMM#1 _ I Scole = 1 = 50' Osidaes wn "oft~ BeanSgs am osm~d OMINER / DEVELD CAVE 8 ASSOCIATI 2489.RICE STREE 4 ROSEVILLE, MI M INC ix an r Z r W V, .• . • • , • . n •••- •• , at PROPOSED DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION _1 - .. .. Ir . r PROPOSED PONDING AREA (OUTLOT 6) E>NUTM1fi OpNT01A1 0 1 . , `.. • • i Dorms LOCATIOfu1 1 ••.ter .1r w *0 Sam .40MIw.1 • w an war+ r • .w oft 4110we wm do . i i0o & 11115 rr Rww. d0r OD On Attachment 5 G, PUBLIC WAINGS - Continued 2. 7:10 FeNe (7:15 P.M.). Cave's English Street Third Addition a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposal to develop lots for ten homes South of County Road B and East of English Street. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Frost presented the Planning Commission report. e. Acting Mayor Rossbach opened the public hearing. calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: dam Cave. representing Cave and Associates. Ltd. Robert Hensley, of Doherty. Rumble. Butler, representing the applicant Jules Loipersbeck, 21 English Street Bill Karel. 2180 English Street f. Acting Mayor Rossbach closed the public hearing. Drainage Easement g. Councilmember Koppen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 -08.93 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION WHEREAS, Sam Cave. representing Cave and Associates. Ltd, applied for the vacation of the following described easement: The drainage and utility easement on Lot b. Block 1, of Cave's English Street Second Addition. WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1) On August 1. 1994. the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council vacate this easement. 2) The City Council.held a public hearing on August 22, 1994, The City staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present:written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting property: Lot b, Block 1 of Cave's English Street Second Addition. 8 -22.94 NOW, THEREFORE. BE. IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above described vacation for the following reasons: 1) It is in the public interest. 2) The vacation will allow a more efficient lot design. 3) The developer will dedicate a new drainage area. This vacation is subject to the developer recording this Resolution with the final .plat. The -City shall not release this Resolution until the City approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson ayes •all Preliminary Pl at fi. Counci I member Kcppen a) Complete all grading for overall site drainage and the pond complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. b)* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. C) .Pay the City for the cost of traffic-control and street identification signs. d) Widen County Road 6 by 4 feet to provide a walkway between McAfee Circle and the County trail property. The developer shall widen County Road B with the new street. The City and County Engineers must approve these plans. The City is requiring this walkway because: 1) it will provide a safe place for the residents of the new plat to walk to the County trail and Gladstone Park. 2) The walkway is to provide.safer access to the trail. 3) These requirements follow City policy as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. e)* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. fl Remove the existing fence and gate from around the vacated part of the pond and install a fence and gate around the new pond in Outl ot B. This fence shall match the existing fence in height and materials. The developer or contractor may salvage the fence and gate materials not used to fence the pond,, subject to the City Engineer's approval. 8.22 -94 I) Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: 2)* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, fence, erosion control, tree, trail and street plans. the lans shall meet the following conditions: a) The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook. b) The grading plan shall include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. c) The tree plan shall show: 1) Where the developer will remove, safe or replace large trees.• 2). The size and species of trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. 3) Enlarge the pond capacity to the maximum practical capacity by changing the side slopes to 3:1. 3) Show the following on the final plat: a) A twenty•foot•wide utility easement between Lots 4 and 5 for the proposed storm sewer. b) A drainage and utility easement on the ease side of Lots 59 69 7 and 10, Block 1, subject to the City Engineer's approval. This easement shall be for the proposed sewer pipes., c) A drainage and utility easement on the north side of Lots 9 and 10, subject to the City Engineers approval. This easement shall be for the proposed sanitary sewer pipe. d) Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. 4) Record covenants or deed restrictions with the final plat that do the following: a) Require the builder of the house on Lot 10 to install a driveway turn-around when they build the driveway. b) Prohibit the driveway on Lot 9 from going onto County Road B. 5) Change "Circle" on the plans to "McAfee Circle ". 6) Deed Outlot B to the City. 7) If -they will accept it, deed Outlot A to the property owners to the west. If they will not, include Outlot A in the McAfee Circle right -of -way. 8)* Obtain a permit from the Watershed B If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat. the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes •all 9 8.22 -94 9 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner fdoem- Tax - Exempt Financing Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phase III) Gervais Avenue, West of White Bear Avenue Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Gerald Mogren) December 13, 1994 INTRODUCTION The applicant is requesting Council approval for $9 million in tax-exempt housing revenue bondfinancing. This request is for Phase III of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood. The applicant is proposing to develop about 140 cottage -style senior housing nits on 'g about eighteen acres. TheproposedsiteisonbothsidesofGervaisAvenuebetweentheCarefreeCottagesandRainbowFoods. (See the maps on pages 6 and 7.) The developer has not su 'p bmtted any plans. In return for this financing, the developer would keep the re -p p rents affordable for low and moderate-income seniors for at least fifteen ears. The developer i • y eloper is proposing similar rents in this phase totheexistingCarefreeCottages. BACKGROUND Tax - exempt financing reduces the interest rate for the developer's financing. 'p nancing. This helps thedevelopergetconstruction .financing and improve the pect's cash 'p p J flow. There s no loss of City money. Nor does the City have any liability or the bonds. This 'ty is money that normallywouldhavegonetotheFederaltreasury. Maplewood has approved tax- exempt financing for four previous senior housing projects. TheseareHazelRidge, the Harmony School site (never built), the Village on Woodlynn senior projectformerlytheCottagesofMaplewood) and the Carefree Cottages (Phases I and II). DISCUSSION Tax Exempt Financing Maplewood has several filing requirements when applying for tax- exempt financing. ThedeveloperisaskingtheCitytowaivetwooftheserequirements. They are the zoning -typeapprovals (land use plan change, conditional use pen (CUP) and Community Design Review Board ) and a market study about housing emand and income re 'g quzrements. This is so they mayapplytotheStatefortax - exempt financing in Janua 1995. The want tYyo be 'in this round of applications to try to get financing ead for spring 1995gYpg construction. To make the .State's January. application date, the developer needs a. resolution of rel'p immary approval from Maplewood by the end of December. (See the letter starting on pagegpg 8. ) As such, the developerhasnotyethadtimetodevelopthesiteanddesignplansandmarketstudy 'g p dy for the project. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Waive two of the filing requirements for tax - exempt financing for Phase III of the CottagesofMaplewood. These requirements are the conditional use permit and Community DesignReviewBoardapplicationsandthemazketstudyabouthousingdemandandincome requirements. The developer shall supply these materials and the City shall'approve theseapplicationsbeforetheCityapprovesfinalfinancing. B.. Adopt the resolution on page 10. It approves tax- exempt mortgage revenue financing for $9milliontoconstructPhaseIIIoftheCarefreeCottagesofMaplewood. Approval is subjecttothefollowingconditions: 1 The developer meeting the City's requirements for tax-exempt mortgagep revenue financing and the following income and rent requirements: a. At least 20% of the units shall have households with an adjusted gross g income of 50 or less of the metropolitan median income or at least 40°o of the units shall have households with an adjusted gross income of 60% of the median income. b. At least 75 %0 of the units shall have households that have an adjusted d grossincomeofnotmorethan110percentofthemetropolitanmedianincome.me. C. At least 51 % o of the units shall be affordable to households that have ad' u sted gross incomes of no more than 80% of the metropolitan median income. 2. The developer shall provide a market study to the City documenting there will be enough demand from seniors over 59 years old for these units over the life of the bonds. Maplewood must approve this study. 3. The City Council must approve a comprehensive lan amendment a conditionalponditional use permit for a planned unit development, any reduction in parking s aces and the fpgpmat design plans. K REFERENCE Past Actions on other Senior Housing Financing 14 -85: The Council gave preliminary approval for $5.8 million of tax-exempt financing forppg up to 100 units for the Hazel Ridge Seniors Residence at 2696 Hazelwood Avenue. 11-25-85.- The Council. gave preliminary approval for $6.5 million of tax-exempt financing for the 11 6-unit Harmony School (Casey Lake) Seniors Residence (County -Road C and White Bear Avenue). This was subject to construction beginning within one year. The developer never built this project.) 1987 -88: The Council approved $2;448,100 of tax- exempt housing revenue bonds for the 60- unit Cottages of Maplewood (Village on Woodlynn) project. In addition theY )proJ Council approved $275,000 of tax - increment financing (TIF). 1988: The City received a Federal grant (CDBG) of $252,500 in 1988 for the Village on Woodlynn project. The developer used this money to buy the land for the project. 1991: The City Council approved tax - exempt and tax - increment financing for the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood (Phases I and II). In 1993, the Council asked the County to approve a low-interest loan for this project. The Council also revised the TIF to allow the developer to keep 100 percent of the TIF. Comparison of Waiting Lists and Rents The waiting lists and rents for the existing senior residences in the area are: Waiting Market Rate Units -Rent L.,ist CIncludes Utilities) 1. Archer Heights - 50+ $379 (1 bedroom) 2. Concordia Arms - 100+572 1 bedroom) 3. Franklyn Park - 170+600 1 bedroom) 4. Village on - 30+635 1 bedroom) Woodlynn 735 2 bedroom) 5. Cottages of - 50+460 1 bedroom) North St. Paul 560 2 bedroom) 3 Waiting it 6. Carefree Cottages - 400 Market Rate Units -Rent LIncludes Utilities) 5,50 (1 bedroom) 650 (2 bedroom) The applicant is proposing the following 1995 rents for this phase of the Carefree Cottages: 435 plus $40 for utilities = $475 per month for aone- bedroom unit; 545 plus $50 for utilities = $ 595 per month for a two- bedroom unit; and 575 plus $60 for utilities = $635 per month for athree- bedroom unit. Required Income and Rent Limitations 1. Federal law requires the City to enforce one of two income limitations for the life of the bond to qualify for tax-exempt housing revenue bond financing: a. Households with adjusted gross incomes of 50 percent or less of the metropolitan median income must occupy at least 20 percent of the units, or; b. Households with adjusted gross incomes of 60 percent or less of the metropolitan median income must occupy at least 40 percent of the units. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME FOR 1994 Percent of Median Income , One„ AdIt Two Adults 50% $17,850 20, 60% $21 24,480 100% $35,700 40,800 2. Ramsey County requires that 51 percent of the units must be affordable (not more than 30 percent of gross income) to households with adjusted gross incomes of 20 percent or less of the metropolitan median income. For one- person households in 1994, the 80 percent annual income ceiling is $28,560. For two- person households, the 80 percent annual income ceiling is $32,640. 0 3. Maplewood's financing policies for tax- exempt financing requires that at least 75% of the units shall have households that have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110 p ercent of the metropolitan median income. Competitiveness with Existing Senior Residences The. design of this development will attract persons usually younger and more independent transportation and socially) than the Archer Heights and Concordia Arms residences. Archer Heights and Concordia Arms require their residents to be 62 or older. The City required a minimum age of 60 for the Village on Woodlynnproject. Staff is recommending the same requirement for this project. Archer Heights and Concordia Arms also have meeting areas that this proposal will not have. This project also should not compete directly with the Hazel Ridge units. Hazel Ridge's rents range from $700 to $900 for one - bedroom units and $980 to $1,300 for two - bedroom units. These rents include wellness programs that will not be available at the proposed development. This project would directly compete with the Cottages of North St. Paul, the Village on Woodlynn and the existing Carefree Cottages (Phases I and II). p :sec 11 /Cottxex.gwo Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. 12 -5 -94 letter from Winthrop and Weinstine 4. Resolution: Tax Exempt financing 5 Attachment 1 BEAM V ^ wt MAPLE WATI K AAM AVMCSSAM b _ P -- counTY COURT KOh4LA1M1 AVE. Ci t KOHLA4AN AVE at S > Ellb Z r EpGEHILL RD. J OE10#!T AVE •. 0 BROOKS AVE. t 8R001CS m di 'b Q. AVE EL vcVgosocTn, AvE. z A .. . AVE. y. GEfNNS S GERVAIS AVE. . Aft v GRIWpYIEW AVE. Ct. VIKlNC OR Y 5Tl.E AVE• iE SHERREN AVE. a cSTyE AVE. COPE AVE. DOPE AVE. cr r- AVE. - ` < AVE. IAURiE •.,* R0. D v v UURIE RD. Za... WJRiE RD J, D. v o SANG URST AvE. i t •: 0 410- = N 1 z 8 n Y Co. RD. B O AVE. m BURKE AVE. o eURKE AVE. O `c'` i 0 ELDR IDCE AVE. 3 ^ Como" ' • " '' AV E. eELMONT AVE. YCR n do SKILL MAN AVE. W1RRtS AVE. : ..• V , ROSEWOOD AVE N. •.. ohk%n.+r ROS D RAAISEY COUNTY •' ;. e.`AN AV. 44 AVE- S. NURSI R CROUlJDS D AVE. GOODRICH • . . . ' .. rrt AlLRICH . ( GOLF • .. _ LOCATION MAP 6 4 N Attachment, Z mr r 3a 46) K.ss. p ++ ( i7} / i o p IQ ' i '04. - -. ». , o' ISO' Q, , po ( 35i ItD w - r-'" (.'S .,z 135Matsa (41) t =css i 0 116 I + c• oe ow » 1= .K 1 '' 1 a +i 1, i f ` 3) 1 76 a c. t,46 la 31) t•Aft s ac. 0 w LOW 10 z21 + i rL t254 • Q w , s2547w /' . • t 264) o , ,.. 2 •. ; 2541 2542 'f ti i N1 s. ' r w ! . • e . WET - -.A t05 2 98 ' ls.c ( 43} _ 2535 1 2534 s o.4.7,Z s WETLAND - - - - -- MAPLE RIDGE "C ca X525 2526 ' , , G MALL e 15O.Q1 00.01 as vs 51.i' I S. •• 1f11. (• I SI f 0.L I tec +Rtt3543 f i ,c BITTERSWEET ESTATES 1 w r s1 r sue • __' - ` Q , RAINBOW FOODS i i N r M1 LBC SIT i ,fig b7.lr 4 i u t" P D uj24, 0 ) v = 71!• r e Mot X3 CAREFREE COTTAGES 9 • sJQ m ! Lu Jai .... G a = D ,3 s 2c t (4) ` 2425 'Z N o 1733 13544 2(19) ; i O • LL SITE Ch 62 too' of ll.&r 444K. - GERVAI S COU 1770 ' 1341.0 . c.4. Ufa ac t 1800 1818 I • ,° 1700 1730 ; L.a,/ 1790.,,., 18901 w1st,; _ - •••:.rr. I NW BELL1 Y cc w , t - w i C3) TOPPER Z 4 ? t WAREHOUSE s ., _ bOFFICEWWORLDJ PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP h Q. N Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: As you may be aware, this firm represents the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood III Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership formed for purposes of acquiring, constructing,g developing, owning and operating a senior, cottage style rental townhome project to be located in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota on two sites bordering Gervais Avenue (the "Project"),, The Partnership has determined that the development of the Project is not feasible absent tax exempt bond financing. In this regard, the Partnership anticipates making an application to the Minnesota Department of Finance for an allocation of tax exempt authority to finance a portion of the acquisition and construction costs relative to the Project. In that context, you have requested a letter from the Partnership explaining the need to bypass an HRA review and approval of this development and go directly to the Maplewood City Council for our inducement resolution. As you are aware, the amount of tax exempt authority allocated to housing (both single and multi- family) is limited. The Partnership is advised that this year there is approximately $46.5 million dollars available in the housing pool in January of 1995. The Partnershi p has also been advised by its professional advisors and bond underwriter that the multi - family pool will be over subscribed in January. That is, the request for tax. exempt allocation will exceed the available multi - family pool devoted to such projects. Accordingly, it is the expectation of those familiar with the market that the over subscription will result in a lottery system whereby proj ects are selected on a random basis for allocation. 0 Attachment 3 WINTHROP & WEINSTINE A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION SHERMAN WINTHROP JON J. HOGANSON Attorneys and Counselors at Law JULIE WIDLEY SCHNELL JAMES W. DIERKING ROBERT R. WEAVSTiNE SANDRA J. MARTIN THOMAS H. BOYD CATHERINE A. DOMINGUEZ RICHARD A. NOEL GARY W. SCHOKMILLER JEFFREY L. SHLOSBERG THERESE M. MARSO ROGER D. GORDON TODD B. URNESS 3200 Minnesota World Tt'ade Center JOSEPH C. NAUMAN MELISSA A. GALINDO STEVEN C. TIOUREK TIMOTHY M. BARNETT 30 East Seventh Street DANIEL C. BECK SUZANNE M. SPELLACY STEPHEN J. SNYDER SCOTT J. bONGOSKE ERIC I NYSTROM TREVOR V. GUNDERSON MARVIN C. INGBER PETER J. GLEEKEL Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 KRISTIN PETERSON LeBRE BLAIR A. ROSENTHAL HART KULLER EDWARD J. DRENTTEL Telephone ( 612) 290-5400 JOANNE L. MATZEN MICHAEL P. NORTH DAVID P. PEARSON JEFFREY R. ANSEL Fax (612) 292 -9347 EVAN D. COOBS KAREN L. YASHAR THOMAS M. HART IV LAURIE A. KNOCKE THOMAS A. WALKER RACHEL A. ARMSTRONG DARRON C. KNUTSON LLOYD W. GROOMS 3000 Dain Bosworth Plaza GINA M. GROTHE FOLLEN MATTHEW T. BOOS JOHNA.KNAPP JULIE K. WILLIAMSON 60 South Sixth Street PATRICK W. WEBER ERIC 0.MADSON BETSY J. LOUSHIN CHARLES A. DURANT Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402MICHELED. VAILLANCOURT MARK T. JOHNSON TIMOTHY J. BETTE NGA JOSEPH S. FRIEDBERG DAVID E. MORAN, JR.JENNIFER WIRICK BREITINGER Telephone (612) 347 -0700 CRAIG A. BRANDT ofCounsel DONALD I BROWN BROOKS F. POLEY Fax ( 612) 347 -0600 MICHAEL A. DUFFY DANIEL W. HARDY Direct Dial December 5, 1994 Reply To ofCounsel 612) 347 -0657 Minneapolis Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: As you may be aware, this firm represents the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood III Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership formed for purposes of acquiring, constructing,g developing, owning and operating a senior, cottage style rental townhome project to be located in the City of Maplewood, Minnesota on two sites bordering Gervais Avenue (the "Project"),, The Partnership has determined that the development of the Project is not feasible absent tax exempt bond financing. In this regard, the Partnership anticipates making an application to the Minnesota Department of Finance for an allocation of tax exempt authority to finance a portion of the acquisition and construction costs relative to the Project. In that context, you have requested a letter from the Partnership explaining the need to bypass an HRA review and approval of this development and go directly to the Maplewood City Council for our inducement resolution. As you are aware, the amount of tax exempt authority allocated to housing (both single and multi- family) is limited. The Partnership is advised that this year there is approximately $46.5 million dollars available in the housing pool in January of 1995. The Partnershi p has also been advised by its professional advisors and bond underwriter that the multi - family pool will be over subscribed in January. That is, the request for tax. exempt allocation will exceed the available multi - family pool devoted to such projects. Accordingly, it is the expectation of those familiar with the market that the over subscription will result in a lottery system whereby proj ects are selected on a random basis for allocation. 0 Mr. Geoff Olson December 5, 1994 Page 2 In order to make an application to the multi- family pool, the Partnershi must have anP inducement resolution by the last week of December. The Partnership does not believe there is adequate time to undertake an HRA review of the Project prior to submission to the iPC Council due to the fact that the bond inducement resolution must be received b the PartnershiYp by the end of the year in order to participate in the expected lo * Januaryary Please contact Bruce Mogren or the undersigned with any or questions o mgYqyoumay have. Very truly yours, WINTHROP & WEINSTINE, P.A. By - Todd B. Urness TBU.-ckm cc; Mary L. Ippel, Esq. 1 Attachment 4 Extract of Minutes of a Meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City n Mon 19th day y of December, 1994, at o'clock . M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A HOUSING PROGRAM CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD III PROJECT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and after full discussion thereof and upon vote bein g taken thereon the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPOSAL FOR A FINANCING PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING REVENUE BONDS, PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A HOUSING PROGRAM CAREFREE COTTAGES OF MAPLEWOOD III PROJECT) a) Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act ") confers upon cities, the power to issue revenue bonds to finance a program for the purposes of planning, administering, making or purchasing loans with respect to one or more multifamil yp 10 housing developments within the boundaries of the city; b) The City of Maplewood, Minnesota (the "City ") has received from Carefree Cottages of Maplewood .III Limited Partnership the Develo er a ( "Developer") p ) proposalpp that the City undertake a program to finance a Project hereinafter described, through the issuance of revenue bonds or obligations (in one or more series) (the "Bonds" pursuantBonds") the Act; c) The City desires to facilitate the development of rental housing within the community; encourage the development of affordable housing opportunities for residents of the City; encourage the development of housing facilities designed for occupancy by elderly persons; and encourage the development of blighted or underutilized land and structures within the, boundaries of the City; and the Project will assist the City in achieving these objectives; d) The Project to be financed by the Bonds is the acquisition, construction and equipping of a rental housing develop approximatelydevelopmentofaroximatel 140 rental units all designed for elderly housing located on the north side of Gervais Avenue adjacent to the existing Carefree Cottages of JMaplewoodproject, and consists of thepp construction and equipping of buildings thereon which will result in the provision of additional rental housing opportunities to elderly persons within the community; e) The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer that conventional, commercial financing to pay the capital costs of the Project is availablepJ only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of operating the project would be significantly reduced, but the Developer has also advised the City that with the aid of municipal financing, and resulting low borrowin ggg costs, the Project is economically more feasible; and fl No public official of the City has either a direct or indirect financial interest in the Project nor will any public official either directly or indirectly benefit financially from the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT .RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City hereby gives preliminary approval to the proposal of the Developer that the City undertake the Project, described above, and the ro ram of financing therefor, pursuantpgg p to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, consisting of the acquisition and construction of multifamily rental housing facilities within the City pursuant to the Developer's specifications and to a revenue agreement between the City and the Developer on such terms and conditions with provisions for revision from time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay, when due, the principal and interest on the Bonds in the total rinci alpp amount of not to exceed $9,000,000 to be issued pursuant to the Act to finance the acquisition and construction of the Project; and said agreement may also provide for the entire interest of the 11 Developer therein to be mortgaged to the purchasers of the Bonds, or a trustee for the holder(s) of the Bonds; and the City, acting by and through the City, hereby undertakes relimin totYYpary issue its bonds in accordance with such terms and conditions. 2. At the option of the City, the Financing may be structured so as to take advantageg of whatever means are available and are permitted by law to enhance the security for, or marketability of, the Bonds; provided that any such financing structure must be consented to by the :Developer. 3. On the basis of information available to the City it appears, and the City hereby finds, that the Project constitutes a multifamily housing develop within the meaning ofpg subdivision 5 of Section 462C.02 of the Act; that the availability of the financing under the Act and the willingness of the City to furnish such financin will be a substantial inducement to theg Developer to undertake the Project, and that the effect of the Project, if undertaken will be to encourage the provision of additional multifamily senior rental housing opportunities to residents of the City, and to promote more intensive development and use of land within the Citt . 4. The Project, and the program to finance the Project by the issuance of revenue Yp City J ppbonds, is hereby given preliminary approval b the Ci subject to the approval of the Metropolitan Council, the holding of a public hearing on the Project and housing pro am andgr subject to final approval by the City, the Developer and the purchasers of the Bonds as to ultimate details of the financing of the project. 5. The City Staff is hereby authorized and directed to prepare a housing program for financing the project prepared in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 46X.03. 6. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the financing of the Project whether or not the Project is carried to completion will be paid by the Developer. 7. Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, acting as bond counsel, is authorized to assist in the preparation and review of necessary cuments relating to the Projectg to consult with the City Attorney, Developer and the underwriter of the Bonds as to the maturities,. interest rates and other terms and provisions of the Bonds and as to the covenants and other provisions of the necessary documents and submit such documents to the City for final approval. 8. Nothing in this Resolution or the documents prepared pursuant hereto shall authorize the expenditure of any municipal funds on the Project other than the revenues derived from the Project or otherwise granted to the City for this purpose. The Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property or funds of the Cit excepttp the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof, nor shall the City be subject to anyY liability thereon. The holder of the Bonds shall never have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the outstanding principal on the Bonds or the interest thereon, or 12 to enforce payment thereon against any property of the City, except such property as may be expressly pledged for the security of the Bonds. The Bonds shall recite in substance that Bonds, including the interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenue and proceeds pledged to the payment thereof. The Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of an constitutional or statutory limitation. 9. In anticipation of the approval by all necessary entities of the housing program and the issuance of the Bonds to finance all or a portion of the Project, and in order that completion of the project will not be unduly delayed when approved, the Developer is herebyY authorized to make such expenditures and advances toward payment of that portion of the costs of the Project to be financed from the proceeds of the Bonds, as the Developer considers necessary, including the use of interim, short -term financing, subject to reimbursement from the proceeds of the Bonds if any when delivered but otherwise without liability on the part of the City. 10. The Developer shall enter into various agreements with the City which shall impose the following restrictions on the Developer and the Project: a) Construction must begin by December 19, 1995. The City Council may grant a time extension if just cause is shown; b) Contracts entered into with contractors doing work on the Project shall provide that: i) the contractor shall not discriminate in the hiring or firing of employees on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability or age. ii) the contractor shall compensate employees with wages and financial remuneration as provided under the United States Code, Section 276A, as amended through June 23, 1986, and under Minnesota Statutes 1985, Sections 177.41 - 177.44. iii) the contractor shall be required to employ Minnesota residents in at least 80% of the jobs created by the project; and, at least 60% of the group shall be residents of the seven - county metropolitan area. Resident status under both of the above categories shall be determined as of the date of this resolution. However, if the contractor can show that these quotas are not feasible because of a shortage of qualified personnel in specific skills, the contractor may request the . City Council for a release from the two residency requirements. The requirements shall continue for the duration of the construction project. iv) the contractor shall be an active participant in a State of Minnesota apprentice program, approved by the Department of Labor and Industry. 13 v) all provisions of these tax-exempt finance requirements shall apply to all subcontractors working on the Project. c) A written opinion, with supporting justification from a qualified expert acceptable to the City, shall be submitted with the application requesting tax exempt mortgage financing to document that: i) The Project will not adversely increase the vacancy rates of rental multiple dwellings in the City that are existing or have received preliminary City approval over the metropolitan average. There is reasonable assurance that the Project will be able to comply with the federal, county and City low -to- moderate income requirements over the life of the bond issue. d) The bond indenture for the Bond shall require: i) The Developer to periodically certify to the City and trustee, compliance with the federal low -to- moderate income requirement. The frequencyqqy of certification shall be determined on a case -by -case basis. The trustee is to inform the City of noncompliance trends with federal low -to- moderate income requirements. e) As a condition of approving the Project, a lump -sum fee at Bond closing or an annual fee over the life of the Bond will be required. The City eserves the right totyg choose the fee option that will be the most beneficial to the City. This choice will be made when the final resolution for the Project and the Bonds is adopted. Factors to beJp taken into account will include, but not be limited to: i) The size of the Bond issue. ii) Unbudgeted City funding needs at the time of the request. iii) The number of requests. iv) Federal arbitrage considerations. f) The formula for each fee option is as follows: i) Annual fee: 1) Full bond maturity: An annual fee payable on each anniversary of the Bond issue of not less than one- eighth of one percent of the unpaid balance and one - quarter of one percent of the Bond issue shall 14 r be paid at Bond closing, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. 2) Prepayment of Bonds: The same as the full Bond maturity prepaidrequirement, except if all of the outstanding Bonds are re aid to final Bond maturity, the developer shall pay, at the time of such prepayment, a lump -sum fee equal to the present value of the remaining annual fee payments, from the date of prepayment to final Bond maturity, subject to federal arbitrage restrictions. Lump -sum fee: At Bond closing, a lump -sum fee shall be p aid that is equivalent to the present value of the annual fee option. The present value must be determined by a qualified expert, acceptable to the City. g) 20% of the Project units shall be occupied by households that have an adjusted gross income of 50% or less of the metropolitan median income, unless the Developer elects to provide 40% of the Project units complying with the 60 % of median income requirement; and h) 75% of the Project units shall be occupied by households that. have an adjusted gross income of not more than 110 %0 of the metropolitan median income Adopted by the City Council of the City of Maplewood, Minnesota this 19th day of December, 1994. 15 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MAPLEWOOD I,_ the undersigned, being the duly alf ed and actinyqg Clerk of the City ofMaplewood, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared . p the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in m •y office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcnpt of the minutes of a meeting f theg .City Council of said .City,duly called and held on the date therein indicated insofar as suchh minutes related to a resolution granting preliminary approval to Carefree Coppttages of Maplewood III ProJect. WITNESS my hand this 19th day of December 1994. City Cl . rk 16 aru• AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action. by Cooi1 e, FAiidV 9dL_ .rrreq T0: City Managerd.',....w.. A ii raririr.r..rwwa+r+.1 FROM: City Engineer Data SUBJECT: Maplewood Innovative Storm Water Management Project UpdateJp DATE: December 12, 1994 The City of Maplewood and its cooperators, the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershedp District, Ramsey County, and the University of Minnesota, Department of Landscapep Architecture, are finalists in the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources LCMR) grant program. The proposed appropriation language. for consideration by the 1996 legislature proposes a $100,000 grant for this ro'ect. The city's cash match forP ! Y the project is $165,000. In addition, the city has received a grant of $79,400 throughg the Minnesota Pollution Control Agenc 's 319 program. This funding acka a will beYpggpg used to implement and evaluate a project that will limit the discharge of storm water runoff from an existing residential area. It is hoped that the lessons learned in the existing neighborhood can be translated to new neighborhoods and ultimately reduce the nonpoint pollution problems. The LCMR grant, the 319 grant, and the city matching funds cannot be spent until July of 1995. Therefore, the main part of the project cannot begin until that time. There is however, some preparatory work that should be started at this time in anticipation of the grant programs. This work would involve meeting with the neighborhood and establishing a small number of prototype designs and developing video imaginggg simulations of practices that may be employed as part of the project. The majority of this work would be performed by members of the University of Minnesota's Landscapep Architecture Department. This activity is currently being funded by an additional grant of $1 0,700 from the McKnight Foundation. It is anticipated that contact with the neighborhood will begin in January 1995. Some preparatory work was done this fall such as photographing existing conditions prior to the leaves falling from the trees. It is expected that we will have general neighborhood meetings about the project and have individual meetings with select property owners to discuss recommendations for their particular home. have attached the current work program in the format required b LCMR as referenceay There is no action required on.the part of the city council at this time. However, as the project proceeds the city council would certainly be involved in the fundin g for the project and would be kept abreast of developments as they occur. KG H Jc Attachment Date of Report: November 30, 1994. LCMR Work Program 1995 1. Project Title and Project Number: Maplewood Innovative Storm Water Management Project - F3 Program Manager. Kenneth G. Haider Agency Affiliation: City of Maplewood Mail Address: City Hail 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, Mn. 55109 Phone: (612) 770 -4550 Fax (612) 770 -4506 A. Legal Citation: ML 95, Chp. , Art Sec. , Subd. 8 (d) Total blennial LCMR appropriation: $100,000 Balance: $100,000 Appropriation language: This appropriation is from the future resources fund to the commissioner of the pollution control agency for an agreement with the city of Maplewood to design, construct, and monitor a demonstration Storm Water management system. This appropriation must be matched by at least $165,000 of nonstate money. B. Status of Match Requirement: The project and its match funds have been given preliminary approval by the city council. The funds are not budgeted at this time. Match Required: $165,000 Amount Committed to Date: $0 Match Spent to Date: $0 II. Project Summary: Urban development is contributing incxeasing volumes of runoff as well as nutrients such as phosphorus that degrade water quality and impact use of lakes and rivers. Statewide and Metropolitan Area plans call for reductions in nonpoint source pollution. However, despite resource concerns, citizens and public officials continue to prefer to drain residential yards and streets as quickly as possible to storm sewers and other channels rather than hold water on site. This project will implement altemative storm water management methods to hold and infiltrate storm water in an older neighborhood that is currently without storm sewers, but where these would be a logical 'improvement to deal with existing problems. The neighborhood and a typical new development will be modeled and the methods evaluated to predict thek effectiveness in other urban areas. The cooperators believe that this system will be less costly than typical storm sewer systems, and will prevent typical environmental impacts of storm sewer drainage to lakes or other surface waters, Lake Phalen in this case. A demonstration of the effectiveness and public acceptance of this method, along with its lower costs, will increase the likelihood of acceptance and kriplementation by local governments. 111. Six Month Work Program Update Summary: NIA IV. Statement of Objectives: A. Model Existing Neighborhood Conditions Outcomes: Computer model of storm runoff quantity and quality Gather base imagery of neighborhoods Survey residents for landscape preferences B. Design Stone Water System and Landscape Elements Outcomes: Develop construction plans and specifications for project Design landscape elements Design water quality monitoring system C. Construct Improvements Outcomes: Conduct bidding and contract award Monitor construction Install water quality monitoring system. D. Monitor System Operation. Evaluate and Disseminate Result Out comes: Conduct water quality monitoring program Gather and analyze data on neighborhood acceptance Produce final report Disseminate results through various media and organizations , Timeline for Completion of Objectives: 7195 1196 W96 1197 6197 Objective A. XXXXXXXXXX Model Existing Neighborhood Conditions Objective B. XXXXXX Design Storm Water System and Landscape Elements Objective C. XXXXXXXXXXX Construct Improvements Objective p. XXXXXXXXXXX Monitor System Operation, Evaluate and Disseminate Results Z V. Objectives /Outcome:A.Z.d. Budget $5,000 Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $5,000 LCMR Balance: $5,000 A. Title of Objective/Outcome: Model Existing Neighborhood Conditions MATCH: o MATCH BALANCE: 0 AA Activity: Model Existing Neighborhood Hydrology A.Z.e. Timeline: A.1.a. Context within the project Establishes the baseline for the test and control neighborhoods 7195 1/96 6196 1197 6197 A.1.b. Methods: Using existing computer software both watersheds wig be modeled Product #1 Computer output XXXXX A.1.c. Materials: none A.1.d. Budget 55,000 A.21 Workprogram Update: Total Biennial LCA1R Budget$5,000 LCMR Balance: $5.000 MATCH: 0 MATCH BALANCE: A.3 Activity: Design Water Quality Monitoring A.1.*. Timeline: A.3.a Context Within Project: This activity will define the water quality monitoring 7195 1198 6196 1197 6197 system used to evaluate the success of the project Product 91 XXXXX A.3.b. Methods: Water quality specialists will evaluate different sampling methods Computer output of modeling results based on topography and flow rates to design a system A.3.c. Materials: None A.3.b Budget:. $6,000 Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $6,000 A.1.f. Workprogram Update:LCMR Balance: $6,000 MATCH: 0 MATCH BALANCE: 0 A.3.e. Timeline A.2 Activity:. Model Existing Water Quality 7195 1/96 6196 1197 .6197 A.2.a. Context within the project Establishes a baseline of water quality for the test neighborhood Product #1 Plan and report XXXXXXX A21. Methods: using existing software the test area will be modeled A.Zc. Materials: None A.31 Work Program Update: 3 4 B.1.d. Budget $13,000 A.4 Activity: Anticipate the Neighborhood Perception of the Ecological Stormwater Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $3,000 System LCMR Balance: 3,000 MATCH: $10,000 A.4.a Context within the Project: Establish baseline condition in neighborhood and MATCH BALANCE: $10,000 develop alternative designs with resident Out A.4.b. Methods: Gather photos and data about existing conditions, hold neighborhood B.1.e. Timeline: meeting, develop small number (<3) of design prototypes, develop video imaging simulations 7195 1196 6196 1197 6197 A.4.c Materials: none Product 81 XXXXXXX A.4.d Budget: $10,700 Plans and specifications Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $0 LCMR Balance: $0 MATCH: 0 MATCH Balance: 0 B.11 Workprogram Update: McKnight Grant: $10,700 A.1.0 Timeline:B.2 Activity: Design landscape Elements of the Storm Water System 7154 1196 6195 1196 6198 0.2. Context: Integrate. the landscape elements into the construction project Product $1 vow imaging simulation of prototypes B.2.b. Methods: interview residents and determine response to prototypes, incorporate landscape elements into project A.41 Workprogram Update:B.2.c. Materials: None 8.2.d. Budget: $13,300 B. Title of Objective/Outcome: Design Improvements Total Biennia! LCMR Budget: $0 LCMR Balance. $13,300 MATCH; 50 MATCH BALANCE: $0 n. 0.1 Activity: Design Pavement and intwvative Storm Water management Practices MPCA 319 Funds: $13,300 MPCA 319 FundsBalance: $13,300 B.1.a. Context within the project: This a documents wig serve as the basis. for contractor bids and construction B.2.e. Timeline B.1.b. Methods: Professional Engineering design standards will be used for this project 7195 1196 6196 1197 6197 13.1.c. Materials: None Product #1 XXXXX)= Plans and specification BILL Workprogram Update: 5 6 m. .».. nr- +............N,+.Mr•.•.em -! fit^*.. ^Nn.w..+ ° , "Y!ex+^^^"?!M^tn'xm"m`^e` Srma•^ IYIm - P ..... - .- ..-- ......, - ......- +...- ....,. ..-.. .... . -«m.e . ..n e . .. - .. ' :_. ..- •x+fmumrf. . fi :Y , .. ven.1!rMa!rewro8tq ti!.• pn• •.ae +'fi?:+.TS"c:_;T. ^;.___ ._,.±...? ^Y••_ ... ,.. C^^..1 __ -..... t.._:. ._ -.___ _. .._._ -- ._. —,_ .._:- .._'Y_ 'l "'...." , ., 1!':'._...._ 1L'..^_ . __".; ..._ C. Title of Objective /Outcome: Construction CA Activity: Award Contract and Monitor Construction C.1.a. Context within the project: New pavement and innovative storm water system are installed CA.b. Methods: A contracting company and appropriate sub - contractors are hired to Install the improvements according to the plans and specifications C.1.c. Materials: None C.1.d. Budget $205,000 Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $0 LCMR Balance: $0 MATCH: $155,000 MATCH BALANCE: $0 MPCA 319 Funds: $50,000 MPCA 319 Funds Balance: $50,000 C.1.e. Timeline: 7195 1196 6196 1197 6197 Product *1 XXXXXXX Completed construction and supporting inspections C.1.E Workprogram Update: 7 C.2 Activity: Install Water Quality Monitoring Equipment C.2.a Context within the Project Initial step in measuring the success of the storm water management practices C.2.b. Methods: Equipment will be installed according to the plans prepared in Activity A.3 C.2.c. Materials: None C.2.d Budget $11,000 Total Biennial LCMR Budget± $9.000 LCMR Balance: $9,000 MATCH: $0 MATCH BALANCE: $ MPCA 319 Funds: $2 MPCA 319 Funds Balance: $2.000 C.2.e Timeline: 7/95 1196 6196 1197 6197 Product $1 XXXXXXX Equipment installation C.2.f Workprogrann Update: 8 D. Title of Objective /Outcolme: Monitor, Evaluate and Final Report D.1 Activity: Conduct Water Quality Monitoring Program D.1.a. Context within the Project: Effectiveness of the storm water practices are monitored D.1.b. Methods: The rented equipment installed in Activity C.2 are monitored and maintained D.1.c. Materials: None D.1.d. Budget $35,100 Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $31,000 LCMR Balanc*: $31,000 MATCH: $0 MATCH BALANCE: $0 MPCA 319 Funds: =4,100 MPCA 319 Funds Balance: $4,100 D.1.e. Timeline 7196 1198 6196 1197 6197 Product 01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Water quality data DAI Worgmgram Update D.2 Activity: Evaluate Neighborhood Response to Ecological Storm Water System. D.2.a. Context within the Project: Neighborhood acceptance of the project is critical to the success of this project D.2.b. Methods: Through neighborhood meetings and survey the residents attitudes and reaction are identified and documented D.2.c. Materials: None D.2.d Budget: $39,000 Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $29,000 LCMR Balance: $29,000 MATCH: $0 MATCH BALANCE: $0 MPCA 319 Funds: $10,000 MPCA 319 Funds Balance: $10,000 D.Z.e. Timeline 1796 1196 6f98 1197 6/97 Product , 01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Executive summary report D.21 Workprogram Update: 9 10 D.3 Activity: Assemble and compare water quality data D.3.a. Context within the Project: The success of the project is identified through the comparison of before and after water quality dais D.3.b. Methods: The data is assembled in a usable format for comparison, project team evaluates the results and conclusions are reached D.3.c. Materials: None D.3.d. Budget: $6,000 Total BlennW LCMR Budget: $6,000 MATCH: $0 MATCH BALANCE: $0 D.3.e. Timeline 7195 1186 6196 1197 6197 Product *1 XXXXXXXXXXX Data compilation 13.31, Workprogram Update: 9 D.4 Activity: Produce final Report D.4.a. Context within the Project: Results are published and disseminated D.4.b. Methods: Project team will write the final report and disseminate the information through direct distribution, news releases and presentations to organizations D.4.c. Materials: None D.4.d. Budget: $6,000 Total Biennial LCMR Budget: $6,000 MATCH: $0 MATCH BALANCE: $0 D.4.e Timeline: 7/95 1196 6196 1197 6197 Product 81 XXX Final report D.41 Workprogram Update: Vi. Evaluation: Success of the innovative methods in effectively holding and infiltrating storm water will be measured through monitoring systems installed as part of the construction, and comparison of post -project runoff quality and quantity with pre -project conditions. Runoff conditions will also be compared to typical new development, which will be modeled to determine potential impacts of installing the alternative methods used in the older neighborhood project area. Success of the methods will also be determined through pre and post- project surveys conducted among neighborhood residents to determine their attitudes and acceptance of current conditions and the altemative storm water methods implemented through this project.. 11 12 VII. Context within Field: Some of the practices used in this project have been used individually before. This project proposes to integrate the application of a number of applications in a local setting and not only evaluate their effectiveness from a runoff perspective but evaluate the acceptance of property owners. This lest step is often overlooked by much of the current research. VIII. Budget Context: a) Activity AA is already in progress due to weather constraints. This work is being funded outside of this project but does produce important information and is therefore included in the Workprogram. IX. Dissemination: A final report will be published describing the project and its results. Data collected during the project will be freely shared. , It is anticipated that the local newspaper and the community newsletter will be used to keep the general public informed about the project. In addition opportunities for presentations to the North American Lake Management Society, City Engineers Association, Water Resources Conference. Minnesota lake Association conference and others will be explored. X. Time: The project has begun because certain photographic data must be gathered during the growing season.. The funding is through a grant from the McKnight Foundation. XI: Cooperation: The City of Maplewood, Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District and Ramsey County will worts jointly through all phases of the project. The University of Minnesota - Department of Landscape Architecture is providing expertise in the area of ecological landscape design, video imaging, and evaluating acceptance of the project. XII. Reporting Requirements: Semiannual six -month workprogram update reports will be submitted not Pater than January 1, 1996, July 1, 1996, January l <1997, and a final six -month workprogram update and final report by June 30,1997. 13 X11. Required Attachment: 1. Qualifications: Project Manager, Kenneth G. Haider - Current.position Public Works Director / City Engineer with the city of Maplewood. Over 20 years experience in engineering and Management. Technical background is provided through design experience, maintenance experience, and formal as well as continuing education. 14 AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City SUBJECT: Beltline Storm Sewer Reconveyance Resolution DATE: December 12, 1994 Aation by: Counoil ModitiedwMe Re J eoted,., „ Data The beltline interceptor was a combined sewer in the City of St. Paul for many years. The beltline serves as the outlet for both Phalen chain of lakes and Beaver. Lake in the City of Maplewood. As part of St Paul's sewer separation program, the beltlineppg interceptor was separated in the late 1980s. The resulting sanitary sewer interceptorgrYp became the responsibility of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The. storm drainage portion of the system likewise remained the responsibility of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Prior to the separation of the beltline system, the Mayors' Lake Overflow Task Force had made a recommendation that the storm water portion of the beltline interceptor be sold to St. Paul and /or the suburbs . and that the eappropriatewatershedmans m entpg agency eventually take over the maintenance of the interceptor. The City of St. Paul is determined that they. should not be the responsible agency since the do not exercisegYY land use control in the upper portion of the watershed. In May 1994, the Metropolitan Council invited policy makers from various cities involved, as well as the watershed district, to discuss the issue of ownership and maintenance for the beltline interceptor. The Ad Hoc .Reconveyance Stud Group wasYp created as a result of this meeting and began meeting on a bi- weekly basis in June. The group has reached consensus on a number of issues relative to the reconve Y ance of the beltline interceptor. They are as follows: 1. The beltline interceptor should be.owned and operated by the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District. 2. That the cost to reconvey the beltline interceptor to the watershed district shall not exceed $952,678, of which $24,998 should be paid to the City of St. Paul for easements, and inspections. Beltline Storm Sewer 2 December 12 1994 3. St. Paul reserving its right to use its pondin areas developed as art of thegpp project and the financing terms for transfer from the Metropolitan Council to the watershed district. It is recommended. that the city council adopt the attached resolution supportingortin the recommendations of the Beltline. Interceptor Reconveyance Study Group. KGH Jc Attachments RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BEL IN'7CERCEPTOR RECONVIEYANCE STUDY GROUP ON OWNERSHIP OF THE BELTLIN]E CEPTOR WHEREAS, at the, urging of the Metropolitan Council, the Mayors' Lake overflow Task Force was established by the Cities of Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Maplewood, North Saint Paul, Oakdale, Roseville, Saint Paul, Vadnais Heights, and White Bear Lake to plan for effective management of lake overflows from Beaver, Phalen, Como and McCarron's Lakes; and vVHEREAS, the Mayors' Lake Overflow Task Force in turn established the Lake Overflow Technical Advisory Committee ( LOTAC), composed of staff of the Cities, the Metropolitan Council, and the former Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) to evaluate alternatives for issues associated with the lake overflows; and WHEREAS, the LOTAC evaluated alternatives and made recommendations that the former MWCC should construct a new Middle Beltline Interceptor, initiate a structural inspection of the Beltline Interceptor, classify the Beltline as unnecessary for metropolitan sewage management purposes, and negotiate an agreement for reconveyance of the interceptor to the City of Saint Paul for use as a storm.water and lake overflow facility, and the LOTAC also recommended that the Beltline Interceptor be sold to Saint Paul and/or the suburbs and that the appropriate watershed management entity eventually take over maintenance of the interceptor, and the Cities and the Metropolitan Council adopted the LOTAC's recommendations and the former MWCC constructed the new Middle Beltline Interceptor at a cost of approximately 13 million, paid one -half the cost of inspection of the Beltline interceptor with Saint Paul paying the other half, and initiated a process for reconveyance of the Beltline Interceptor to the City of Saint Paul at a depreciated value of $1,399,381; and WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul determined that it was not advisable for Saint Paul to become sole owner of the Beltline Interceptor, due to its limited authority to control land use practices within the Beltline subwatershed. and due to equitable considerations that all cities. which benefit from the availability of the Beltline Interceptor should share the costs and responsibilities of owning and operating the interceptor as a storm water facility; and WHEREAS, in May, 1994, the Metropolitan Council invited policymakers from the Cities of Saint Paul, Maplewood, Little Canada, vadnais Heights, White Bear Lake, North Saint Paul, Gem Lake, and Oakdale, the Counties of Ramsey and Washington, and the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District to a meeting to discuss issues of ownership and maintenance of the Beltline Interceptor, and WHEREAS, as a result of the meeting of policyrnakers, the Interceptor Reconveyance Study Group was formed, made up of policymakers and/or staff of the watershed district and the affected cities and counties, and facilitated by staff of the Metropolitan Council, including staff from Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services; and WHEREAS, the Study Group met biweekly from June through October and achieved consensus on a number of recommendations regarding ownership, operation, maintenance, value, and financing of the transfer of the Beltline Interceptor, for continued use by the cities for storm water management; and WHEREAS, the Council convened a meeting on.November 17, 1994, in the Maplewood Community Center, at which time the Study Group's findings and recommendations were presented and explained to policymakers from the affected entities; and WHEREAS, the City [or County] of supports the consensus process used to resolve these difficult issues and desires to endorse the recommendations of the Beltline Interceptor Reconveyance Study Group, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That the City [or County] of . supports. the recommendation of the Beltline Interceptor Re'conveyance Study Group that the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed District become the owner and operator of the Beltline Interceptor, which will continue to be used for storm water and surface water management. 2. That the City [or County] of supports the recommendation of the Beltline Interceptor Reconveyance Study Group that the Metropolitan Council receive a fair value for transferring the interceptor to the Watershed District, in an, amount determined between the Watershed District and the Metropolitan Council, but not to exceed $952,678, of which 524,998 should be paid to the City of Saint Paul for interceptor easement costs and Saint Paul's portion of the inspection costs. 3. That the City [or County] of supports the recommendations of the Beltline Interceptor Reconveyance Study Group regarding joint use of the City of Saint Paul's ponding easements and financing terms of the Interceptor transfer from the Counccil to the Watershed District. Adopted this day of December, 1994. CITY [COUNTY] OF resbclt -- 11/15/'94 AGENDA REPORT t TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Storm Water Pond Design Standard DATE: December 12, 1994 AGENDA ITEM Action by Counoil : idax ed- Date In 1990 the U.S. EPA and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency agreed on a goal ofgY9g percent. The tworeducingnonpoint - source pollution to the Minnesota River by 4o p agencies set a target date for 1996. To accomplish this goal land use controls and r agricultural practices will have to be changed.i While the Minnesota River is presently the most acute p pproblem, the same non oint- g source pollution, affects all of the water bodies in the Twin. City area. For this reason, the Metropolitan Council has adopted an interim strategy o reduce non point-sourcegYp Pollution in the metropolitan area.. 1n order to com I w ith this inters spmstrategy,citiesppYgY, are required to do a number of things. There are three priorities for the City of Maplewood. The first is to adopt a standard that addresses erosion control within the city. he cityY has recently adopted a new erosion control ordinance that fully complieslies with the t Metropolitan Council requirements. The second action concerns adoption of the shoreland ordinance as required b theq .Y Department of Natural Resources. The City of Maplewood has recently revised its shoreland ordinance and the draft is being reviewed at the resent time b the variouspY agencies. The city is, again, in full compliance with the Metropolitan Council requirements in this regard. The third concern centers around the city's standard for storm water pond design. The city has no formal policy at the present time. The Metropolitan Council's strategy indicates the city should use the National Urban Runoff Pro ram (NURP) standard for9 design of new storm water ponds. This design standard is very similar to the engineering standards that are now employed to review new storm water pond proposals. In order to comply with the Metropolitan Council's recommendation and to continue Maplewood's efforts in controlling nonpoint - source pollution, it is recommended that the Storm Water Pond Design 2 December 12 1994 city council adopt the National Urban Runoff Program. standards for new storm water pond design. When the city council adopts the new storm water pond design standard the Metropolitan Council will be notified that the city is now in compliance with their interim strategy to reduce nonpoint- source pollution to metropolitan water bodies. KGH ic s7 Rati by C ouno l l ftdo eA ...... MEMO UM it City Manager Modified .. ,.. ,..To. Michael A. McGuire,, ty From: Bruce K. Anderson, Dir arks & Recreationon, Sub' Timber Park e 1 tae - -- Date. December 5, 19 For The Dece r 1 9; ` Ci C5 uncil Meeting Introduction Timber Park has been identified in the 1995 Capital Improvement Plan to have new playground equipment and a shelter. Upon reviewing of the site, it ipg s my recommendation that Timber Park should be completely renovated and that new playground equipment will not resolve the current oor design and deteriorating condition. The enclosed Master Plan, prepared jointly byp g city staff and Brauer & Associates, proposes a new look and/or concept for small main- parks. Background Timber Park was intially developed in 1973 and has served the neighborhood well for the past twenty ars. The initial conc of the ark was to provide for a single tennis court that couldtyyppp be flooded in the winter for winter skating and a Tot -Lot or creative play area. The current park is in deteriorating condition with the retaining wall needing to be replaced and blackto needin to be overlaid or removed. The playground equipment was .blacktop heeding p ' removed in the Spring of 1994, due to unsafe conditions. The Timber Park Plan proposes to open up the park with additional landscaping and green space areas and include the addition of a Sand Volleyball Court. Specific features that have been included in the Timber Park design are as follows: 1. A separation of the swing sets from the rest of the creative play area. It is my professionalpg opinion that swings should be separated whenever possible, due to their potential danger. 2. The perimeter of the Tot -Lot is proposed to be a concrete curb, which not only lasts longer but also provides ease of maintenance. 3. A small p arent shelter has been included, which will provide good visual access for the entire park area. 4. The half -court basketball area will utilize the existing asphalt, assuming a new lift will be placed on top. 5. A Sand Volleyball Court has been located on the northern border. b. The playground equipment that is being proposed is by a European company called KOMPAN, which is the world's largest playground equipment manufacturer and relativelyg new to the United States. 7. The plan proposes to eliminate the majority of retaining walls currently in existence and utilize existing trees, wherever feasible. The estimated cost for this site is $50 The Capital Improvement Plan has $30,000 budgeted for 1995. The Park and Recreation Commission held two public neighborhood meetings to review the proposed Master Plan. Based on public review and staff reports, the Park Commission unam- mously recommended on November 21, 1994, that the City Council adopt the Master Plan for Timber Park as proposed with the development monies to not exceed $50,000 allocated from the PAC Fund. Recommendation It. is my recommendation that the city proceed with the, redevelopment of Timber Park at an estimated construction cost to not exceed $50,000, with the remaining $20,000 to be either identified through the Commercial PAC monies or through re- .allocation of other proposed Capital Improvement projects for 1995. 1 further recommend that Brauer & Associates be retained to prepare plans and specifications at a cost of 5% of construction budget. 42' x 35' BASKET BALL COURT USING EXISTING ASPH W17H NEW . ASPHAL7 LIFT ON\ 707 TRACK -- RETAINING WALL15EATINCo GRADE SLOPE 70, MINIMIZE AMOUNT Or RETAINING WALL SWINGS 1 f (SA IMPROVE V15UALI 50LIND 1507ER WITH PLANTINGS 1` SAfFTY SURF AGE' ADA ACCE55 5ANDWORK5 Kr, OF W17H PLANTINCSW.W REL OCA TE DRAIN F'OR IMPROVED DRAINAGE 00 PAREN SHELTER OPEN GREEN SPAC PICNIGS MI SG. GAMES L " D 2 SUPER SCOOP DIGGERS 115 ADA ADAPTED i •e pola 74' x 4G' SAND VOLLEY BALL COURT EASEMENT KEPT CLEAR a Or SUB GRADE CHANGES IV- 707 TRACK ROUTE CONTINUC5 AROUND PERIMETER Or PARK TRAIN d7A TION WIPLA TrORM CRAZY DAISY SPRING RIDE MUSTANG WHIRL qw IMPROVE VISUAL/ SOUND BUFFER ftwo t mom hot ov a a: n o 0 f4) O O O PCMdwv Lei . ALVA , ` ems \`/ '• rte- e P 0 r :1 rp- lbw b Z rot 4 cl -4 1110 I 0 tit 710 r nd Timber Park Cit of Usplowood rn(pm rr :*:-t X - P rq tin ip us r nd Timber Park Cit of Usplowood WW Lawld U6W PlMM&uq ON-asum- L*.J. MEMORANDUM ,e To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manage Nod led- From: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Par cr Re eote cl,,, Subj : Master Plan For Western Hills Park Date: December 5, 1994 For the December 19, 1994 City Council Meeting Introduction The city retained Brauer & Associates to provide landscape architecture services for the develop-pmentofaMasterPlanforWesternHillsPark. The Park and Recreation Commission coordinated the park Master Plan review process and held three public meeting with the neighborhood to re-g new and refine the proposed Master Plan. The 1995 Capital Improvement Plan proposes to redevelop Western Hills Park with an estimated budget allocation of $125,000. Back round Western Hills Park currently has minimal development, including wo tennis courts parking 1g ' p got' picnic - shelter, and a free -form play structure. The neighborhood has changed significantlycantl duringggygthepasttwentyyearsandparkusehasbeenreduced, due to the deteriorating condition of the Neighborhood Park. The Park and Recreation Commission has held five public meetings with neighbors, residentsgg , abutting property owners, city staff and consultants to finalize the ro osed Master Plan. App Public Hearing was held at Edgerton Elementary School on Monday ctober 24. The Park andY Recreation Commission recommended the enclosed Master Plan be adopted b the Ci CouncilpYY at their regular scheduled meeting on November 21, 1994. The redevelopment of Western Hills Park includes: 1. Reconstruction and relocation of the two tennis courts from the low drainage area to the western edge of the park. A single tennis court will be constructed in concert with a full basketball/hardcourt facility. 2. A Sand Volleyball Court has been proposed. 3. Two Tot -Lot areas; one for preschool, one for elementary playY area. 4. The site will be regraded to provide for a formal playfield, better access and visual aesthetics of the site while not compromising the sledding hills and required bermin from Hwy. 35E.q g wY5. The winter skating area will be relocated to the low drainage area where the existing tennis courts are. g g 6. An extensive loop Trail System has been proposed with accesses to Adolphus Street and Summer Avenue. The proposed budget adopted by the Park and Recreation Commission should not exceed 250 All funds for the development of Western Hills Park will be allocated from the PAC Fund. The policy which allocates PAC money for specific neighborhoods and is being reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission. I envision that a recommendation will be forwarded to the Cit Council that the Park Planning Districts be either eliminated or reduced, which will permit the allocation of existing Pac monies for this project or Commercial/Industrial monies will be utilized. The redevelopment of Western Hills Park will require increased allocation of time and resources for Park Maintenance. I am currently working with Park Foreman Mark Maruska to develop a cost analysis of Park Maintenance on a per acre cost. I have established this as a 1995 prioritypy and plan to utilize our data in preparation of the 1996 budget and for policy makers to understand the fiscal impact of developing new parks and renovating existing facilities. Recommendation Staff concurs with the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation and ro oses that thepp City Council adopt the proposed Master Plan for Western Hills Park to be developed in the Spring of 1995 at a cost to not exceed $250,000 with monies to be allocated from the PAC Fund. Brauer & Associates is currently under City contract to re are plans and specifications at 5%p p p p of actual construction cost. 71ONACRESTCLMVE IJ. PULL04M OOUXT % A I owowFwu MW 00"M OMPAML AMW"WVM PARK POTOMAL TEAL ALM ADOLMa *AND VOLLAVOR" comr 1w mmeam LMK TO LAPPOMM M VAMAND WoLawas WAU OCWANU* I • \ , / : ` j ' way 2 101LA 10 cdft i omit Kwww" Ppmc---w& TO umom rpowsw-- OLs 0 40 80. 120 ra room I w" r? @too jrr* Lo" r SCALE IN FEET vv c VKLUMINAKY MASTER PLAN -n Master Plan Cost A vis West m- Ms Perk -City of M*ewvod Western Hi1Ls Master Plan Cost Ana4sis Ove T7-7 Cost AnaIy's is defines the pownti.al s associated NNE &vie loping the site as ilhxsft--:Yxd on die Master Plan ILe Quality F.sstte Ma ntainir a high level of quaEty for all padk cmponenls is ' t m that public parks such as thLs haNre ect x3ed li ec cles (15 to 20 Nmrs) and are suit to he • use. Although T ality is a ke7yr . cooce oast bility must also b e ed to ensure tiot public fimds are ter spent It must be kept in mind, ho Derr, tit cost ocutrol can only be taken to a certain point before the level of gudrty beo Ruspect and unacceptable. The ada that you get tires you pay for usuaEv holds tnx, especially in publi c projects such as &s wbere long lifecyr,,les are expected and mamtmance budgets are limit. To this encL the colAs useded m dns e are based on the use of m9erials and oxvqmc6oD techniques that have proven to be durable promote a safe recreational my ironme t, and mini lif -le coo. s Tae range of poteutial. cle Mc p moot scenarios is quite broad. ' ' t a phasim pmgmm may be the cost esamate is broken dovvn on a foci . fy by facility basis to allow the city flexibility x%ith rat to phasing scenarios and project fimdin lip twil The cost figs are intmded to be used for bul pl and Wnpurposes, lJ ect the relative cost of one item to anod)er. The costs acre based 0n 1994 dollars amd reflect the current bidding aftwsph Although the intmt is to be co vain, actua1 costs will vary deperAm on the bidding en NNhen the proJect is bid The folloMTq is a r of ant iced cn elopment costs bry section: Section I - R S 15,200 S.71. on 2 - Ea&rworVCxneral Uffhies:39,000 Section 3 - 'Mk 55,400 Section 4 - M sc. Site Improvements:3 7,5 Section 5" - Play Areas 40,960 Section 6 - ' Seed and Sad:2 000 Section 7 - Site Leg 4A0 Consftuc Total=215,OK 5'Y Constrwfion C y 1 0,754 etion Total Plusr 2' 5, 8 36 130 /6 Design, Enewerin Sxve" in,aTesting;2, 5 i Grand Total: 5248,420 Brauer & Associatm Ltd. ': November 18, 1994 MOster PLan Cost Anahsi Westem Hills. Park - Cat of Maplmuod Convrehenm*ve Cost Analysis for Westem Park U&b Legen& I = IAurp Sure, C — Cubic Yard S = Square Feet a _ Square Ya:rcL EA = Each, 11 _ L6eal Feet.,Acre See c ion 1 - Removal Criteria:Remov items are indi % idual ly listed and described.. Estimates are based on quan ity esdaiate f vm nuAable base wing and on -site - f ell review. Section 1 - Remo Item Dew6ption Estknated Unit Unit Price ToW Cost Qty.In. Do lm)In Do&n) 1 Rcna ' and aaToun n.g appurterknees l LS 1,500.00 1.500.00 2 Remove . ' ' ,- Paidw lot asps curb and surface 1 LS 3.000. CXI 3,0* 00 3 Remove exisd ci fence armnd tennis oourt and tmais nets LS 2,300.00 2 O0.fl0 4 Remove exisfing terxus court asphalt surface LS 4,400.00 4,400.00 5 Remove ' g wall adj a=t to tem s courts l LS 1, 200.00 1,2X0.00 b Ramve exi sting backstop l EA 304.0E 3 Miscellaneo site rer .s 1 LS 2,5 00.00 2,5 Secfion 1 - Re ads Total: Nbstff Pim Cost Anat Westem Hffls Park - Cit of Nlaple-*NDod Section 2 = Earthvwk and General Ufi'ties CHeria: Fmtmurk- esdmafe is based on a roqh quanta` y take-off aad the consul=fs experience NNith pro Of si scale and compladt Theseoostsdonottakeintocowidmfiondie. rjeed for wfora3ean sos omecdow, such as under tmnis courts and parkin lots. Stmn scmw costs base4 outhethaton-site can be diecsed to eidw on-site pondin areas or into the municipal swan -se wr s 9 Section 2 - General Utflities Item ` on Fstirmte Quantit unit Unit Prke In Dollars Taw Frice In DoAm Eafthwork - inc ladin topsoil strip and stookpile, muo win and topsoil 12:14 ow. oo 24100).00 Storm seer system to coutrol on -s drair=e.LS 10.000-00 10,00100 Water fmmtam b pla areas ( wafer smice is avglable near park entrance 1 LS 5,000.00 5 .00 Section 2 - Earthwork and GenersJ Ufihfws Total: Section 3 - Pavements C rit r : The mater plan calls for a mew park lot an6 aocess drive. It also calls for ,%r paths and Nralkway pavin throu the park Sertion 3 - Pavements Fsdmate Qmwtty Uaft Unit Price In DoUan Total bim In DoEars asphalt surf (two liftswin N%ith 6' Cmshed base fora pwi< lot 700 SY 11-50 8.050.00 B612 oonavw curb aod for parkin lot 4W 6. -5o A 6M.00 3 A- asphalt squfaci N,*itb 6" cnrbed aLng base for wail 500 SY 11-00 5} . 00 4 r aSPU t afffaIC3into:) (tAu lifts) Aith 6" cnisbed a?Vegate hase for tenmi-s and basketbd oclurt SY 11.50 17,250.00 Section 3 - P-averwats ToW: f Brauer & A3&x kves. LU- 3 Novet-nber 18, 1994 YkWer Plan Cost Ana4qjis Western HIIS PWk - Ci'}? of K*ewood Section 4 - Msmflaneous Site Improvements Q- ter' General ske ameaides are as ddiried below. Secdon 4 - Afbwelkuus Site Imprwemeab Item Description End mite Unit Unit Prioe Total Pri:e Quantit (In Doflu-s ( b Dollars) I Tennis me fenciog 3 62-LF 25.00 93050 - .00 2 Basketball cowt fercing 230 LF I )2.00 21760.00 0 Tennis bounce wail I FA 2,300.00 2,300.00 4 Basketbail goal outfit 7 EA 1,650.00 300-00 5 C6rr.:aaat surfacm, for tenw-s and carts SY 3.25 4,712-50 6 6- Tennis ootzrt met aLeA 1 EA 700.0 700-00 7 Backstcp EA 2,000.00 2,OW.1)0 8 Dd voHeybd cow ( 11'" sand) aDd net poz EA 1 , &)0.00 1,800.00 9 Hxs pits 2 EA 700.00 1-2400.00 10 Benches, picnk tkles, and gills on slab LS 6,500.00I 6s500.00 11 Bike rack LS 500.00 500.00 hwraveme= to park aw ss point at end of strata,LS 2,500.00 Seodon 4 - Mmellaneous Site Impravements TotW.-3 Bmuer & As,%ciw Ltd N ov "' 'ie-naber- 18., 1994 rj tT Plan Cost AnaFysis Westem HJDs P&k - City of Maplewood Sean 5 - My AMy Criteria: The oust estne for tine play area incWes concrete tot-tack/play area container, saad, and play eq-jpu=L The plan areas am hstad as desmbed on the master plan. The Est for Qe is included under t stom seer itm in Section 2 above. Secdon 5 - • Areas Itein Demipfion Quantity unit Unit ice I ft DORM) ToW Prim t ( b Nuam) 1 Play area comrete tot tracVplay area container 470 LF 28.00 13 60.00 2 Sand i n pla} areas Cho qZY 14.00 2, 800.00 3 Play equipment in.pre -school and elementary play area (budc fire)1 LS 015,000.00 25.ODG.00 Section 5 - Play Areas Tats:4#,,9W. Sec i.on 6 - Landscaping u)d Seed/Sod Croria: ia, costs iDdudes trees and shmbs to m went egg, site vegetation. The budget figure is tad on pis of similar and kve1 of developmeni. Seed a c d sod ocsts refer to wneml site restmadon in areas i npded by devel Section 6 - Lan and d Iteam Desciptian E5dmate j Unit tlni# Price din crlLars L— Toil. Price k 1 Gene t lamed rnQ Whase 1 V L d -- other phas€s to folio 1 LS 13,000-00 1 a A0. too 2 Q and stud areas t ot&rwise defined.1 LS 10 00 10,00(}.00 Simon 6 - Landscaping and Total:1.34.. B.-auer & aAssociabm Ltd- Moster Plan Cost Anal Westan -- Tills Park - City of Maplewood1 Simon 7 - Site Lj Crftedar* Pwidn tot and entrmm dri-ve is based on prod a min a leml of 1_i for basic so '.parWaHm-av H alorm k ft-,dls has not been ffich)d. N Section 7 - Sits Li Item DescTipfion Esfimate unit Unit Price Total Price Q=nfitv In DoUm Un Dogm I SeaTitv E for parkin lot LS 4.000.00 4000.00 SOLI '7 - Ske Total:A00(LOO Co Ca Con6m ($10 Consftmetion and Confin Total: Des n Fx Surve and Testin Fees ( 10"/* ) Grand Total 7 m I m F- 71 Brauer &' Ass;;o6atm W. 6 1 November 18.. 1994 Western Hills Neighborhood Park Programming Worksheet Parks and Recreation Commission for City of Maplewood Programming Worksheet Summary Statement fo r Western Hills Neighborhood Park City of Maplewood Planning Agency: Park and Recreation Commission Prepared By: Brauer &Associates, Ltd. 7301 Ohms Lane, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55439 612) 832 -9475 Date: Comments taken during Park Commission meeting on September 19, 1994 Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Western Hills Neighborhood Park Programming Worksheet Parks and Recreation Commission for City of Maplewood General Project Overview Advisory Committee Parks and Recreation Commission for the City of Maplewood and city staff. Liaison between Advisory Bruce Anderson, Director of Parks and Recreation, Committee and Brauer & City of Maplewood Associates Consultant Team Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Project Manager: Jeff Schoenbauer, RLA, Vice President Project Design: .George Watson, RLA, President Bill Delaney, MLA, Landscape Architect In- Training Project Engineer: Steve Harvey, PE, Director of Engineering Advisory Committee Role in the The Parks and Recreation Commission will oversee the project from Project a design standpoint. The ultimate design of the project will largely be based on the Commission's recommendations, although the citizens of the community and City Council will have the opportunity to voice their concerns and opinions, as appropriate. Staff will represent the interests of the city to ensure that the design outcomes are consistent with other city -wide concerns, policies, and planning efforts. Project Schedule Establishing a regular meeting schedule is important to maintain continuity in the project. A typical scenario is to meet on the Commission's regular monthly schedule and add meetings as necessary. The meeting schedule will be discussed during the September 19th meeting. Meeting Outcome The following establishes the Project schedule: Date Aaenda October 17 Concept meeting w /Park Commission October 24 Public meeting to review concepts November 21 Preliminary Concept meeting with Park Commission (Public Invited) December ... Submit final plan to Park Commission Regulatory / Outside Agency A number of agencies may be involved in the project at some point. Involvement The Watershed District, DNR, MPCA, and Corp of Engineers, are possible candidates for involvement. They will be brought in for review as appropriate. Meeting Outcome Continuing to look into with staff. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 2 Western Hills Neighborhood Park Programming Worksheet Parks and Recreation Commission for City of Maplewood Programming Worksheet Overview The following identifies issues and topic areas that will need to be considered in the development of the master plan for the park. The program essentially defines the overall project parameters, including needs, facility demands, and priorities. Naturally, the more complete the program, the greater the opportunity to explore a variety of design solutions. Please take the opportunity to consider the following prior to our next meeting. Neighborhood Group Naturally, those living close to the park will have legitimate concerns involvement/Publie Meetings about its future development. Given this, the process allows for and encourages their involvement. This includes a public meeting to review alternative concepts and a follow -up meeting to review the preliminary master plan. Beyond that, do you feel that additional public involvement is needed? Meeting Outcome Public involvement meets city established park planning process. Is there any groups or individual that should be directly contacted that may want to have input into the process? Meeting ,Outcome The Park Commission felt it important to seek input from the fo ll o wing: 1) Apartment complex south of the site. 2) Owners of Champs 3) Adjacent property owners with concern for trail access points. Names given were Marla Rostrono 488 -8732} and Susan Kramer (489 -2860) Site Parameters Generally speaking, the project area includes the park property and the adjacent wetland on the south end of the site. Are there any other areas that should be included? Meeting Outcome In addition to the defined area, consideration should also be given to linking the wetland area off of Adolphus into the park via trails. Also, a trail link from Onacrest Curve should be looked into to allow for greater access to the site from the neighborhood. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Western Hills Neighborhood Park Parks and Recreation Commission Programming Worksheet for City of Maplewood Site Analysis A site analysis will be undertaken as part of this project. This will include all site features and buildings. Based on your knowledge of the site, what specific concerns do you have about the existing facilities? Meeting Outcome Review "Western Hills File" to gain understanding of timing of past development. Also, discuss soil conditions and existing sanitary sewer line with city engineer to determine development parameters. General Design Considerations At this point, we do not want to place any limits on the design possibilities for the site. Doing so only hampers creativity and limits our ability as designers to come up with a unique or innovative design. The idea is that it is better to consider an idea and discard it as part of the process than not consider it at all. Some of the most off- -the -wall suggestions can turn out to be major influences on design. That being said, please consider the following. Who do you see as the primary users of the facility? Meeting Outcome The demographic profile of the area tends to indicate a transition from an older age group of residents to younger couples with children. It is important to recognize, however, that the senior group remains a significant part of the user population and therefore require adequate facilities. Beyond families (in a general sense) and seniors, the development of the park must also provide for the following more specific user groups: Minority groups -- especially Asian Children Teens As defined, it is clear that the park has to be developed to accommodate a diverse user group. Do you see any up -front design limits? Meeting Outcome Aside from budget, no specific limitations Were defined. The overall project budget is not defined. The design process should seek to fulfill neighborhood needs first, then consider overall costs associated with that level of development. There is, however, a Phase 1 budget limit of between $120,000 and $130,000. Phase 1 priorities are to be determined as part of the planning process. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Western Hills Neighborhood Park Programming Worksheet Parks and Recreation Commission for City of Maplewood What are the site's key shortcomings? Meeting Outcome Simply stated, the park lacks functional facilities that meet contemporary user needs. The current park design has reached the end of its effective lifecycle and needs to be redone. Where is the greatest opportunity for improvement? Meeting Outcome No specific single item. Instead, creating an interesting and unique park setting that serves a broader set of user groups by incorporating desirable program elements into the design is what will improve this park. What recreational programming opportunities do you envision? Meetin_q Outcome Being that the park is largely for neighborhood use, recreational programming will not be extensive. However, certain facilities, like a basketball or volleyball courts, that are desirable neighborhood park facilities may be programmed on a limited basis. The key is that these facilities must first and foremost serve the needs of the neighborhood. Attached is some background information about neighborhood needs and concerns based on a neighborhood survey and other input. Based on this information and what you know about this park, which activities and amenities merit further consideration? Meeting outcome in general terms, providing a pallet of facilities and amenities that appeal to a variety of user groups is most desirable. As the survey illustrates, the demand for specific facilities is fairly balanced, indicating significant diversity of user needs. Although a balanced approach is desired, it is also clear that certain facilities and amenities should be strongly considered given the demographics of the area. These include (in no specific order of priority); Basketball court (with accompanying hardsurface play area for four- square, hopscotch, etc) Volleyball court Preschool and elementary play areas Trails (accessible to all users were feasible) with possible fitness stations. Sifting /observation areas `especially geared toward seniors) Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Western Hills Neighborhood Park Programming Worksheet Parks and Recreation Commission for City of Maplewood Tennis court (perhaps only one). Landscaping Theme Small shelter structure Improved neighborhood -level ballfield and soccer field. Sliding hill. Security lighting. Improved signage Ice skating (perhaps overlay a summer -use area). Consideration should be given to placing a resilient or sport surfacing under the skating area to avoid undesirable dead grass problem in the summer. Picnic facilities. Which should have the highest priority? Meeting Outcome Given the diversity of need, no single item stands out as a priority (at this time) over any other item. it is recognized, however, that priorities will need to be discussed during the process to determine the Phase 1 development package. What site access and parking concerns do you have? Meeting Outcome Vehicular access and parking are significant considerations, with no ready solution. Given that this is a neighborhood park, parking is not always desirable. The intent, of course, is to encourage those living in the area to walk and discourage those from other communities or other park service areas from excessive use of this park. Unfortunately, circumstances in this case may dictate that a limited amount of parking may be necessary (i.e. up to 10 cars). This is largely driven by two factors: 1) lack of trail access from the southwest; and 2) the use of the site by daycare providers. Some concerns about providing parking include the potential for increased crime and non -park use of the parking lot by nearby businesses. Clearly, several options need to be explored in this regard. What trail linkage concerns do you have? Meeting Outcome As stated, trail access to the park is limited. Given this, additional consideration needs to be given to trail access from Onacrest Curve, the roads that dead end at the park, and along Adolphus from Larpenter (which is considered Brauer & Associates, Ltd. Western Hills Neighborhood Park Programming Worksheet Parks and Recreation Commission for City of Maplewood dangerous to walk or ride a bike along). Linking the wetland along Adolphus into the park via trail connection should also be considered. List any remaining ideas or concerns you may have. Meeting Outcome The following defines additional considerations: Consider moving "center" of the park toward the north end of the site (to improve security and reduce noise impact of freeway). Consider reasonable ways to reduce noise impact on the site. Meet the intent of ADA requirements. Consider space for "Summer -in- the - Park" programs. Try to expand winter use of the park. Consider ways to improve safety and security of the park, such as improving sight lines into the park. Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 7 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager Gtr Acts by, Council doe Xodifieflp ON .. .. ... Rej eote Date RE: RELEASE OF RETAINAGE - STEININGER CONSTRUCTION DATE: December 6, 1994 INTRODUCTION Steininger Construction Co., Inc. is the contractor responsible for the site utility work and soils corrections for the Community Center project. The purpose of this report is to request the release of his retainage - $28,223.62 for the contract. BACKGROUND Steininger Construction was the second contract awarded for the Community Center project. The original contract amount for utility work and grading was $124,000.00 With the planned additional soils corrections, change orders totalled $158,236, and the final contract amount was $282,236.21. Steininger's work was completed in the fall. Based on the Construction Manager's advice, staff is recommending that the retainage be returned. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the return of Steininger Construction's retainage in the amount of $28,223.62. RESOLUTION FOR THE RETURN OF RETAINAGE FOR A COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT CONTRACT FOR SITE UTILITIES AND SOILS CORRECTIONS WHEREAS, the Cit Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered the construction of a Cit communitit center, Communit Center Pro and has let a contract with Steinin Construction Co., Inc. for site utilities and soils corrections and WHEREAS, the Cit is holdin 10% of the $282,236 contract amount as retaina and WHEREAS, the Architect and Construction Mana evaluated the construction and acknowled substantial completion on September 23, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the Ma and Cit Clerk are hereb authorized and directed to release the retaina in the amount 41 nt of $28,223.62 to Steinin Construction Co., Inc. APPLICATION AND ERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT G702 (Instructions on reverse side) PAGE ONE .,F RAGES TO (OWNER): City of Maplewood* PROJECT: Maplewwod Community CenterAPPLICATION NO 5 Distribution to: 1830 E. County Rd. B - OWNER Maplewood, MN 55109 PERIOD TO:1 1 - -94 [1 ARCHITECT CONTRACTORFROM (CONTRACTOR) Steininger ConstructidAA (ARCHITECT): Ankeny, Kell, R_ ichler ARCHITECT'S 3070 Lexington Ave. SO Walsh PROJECT NO 92076.00 Eagan, 'MN 55121 CONTRACT FOR: Soil Correction and Site Utilities CONTRACT DATE June 8. 1993 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Change Orders approved in previous months by Owner TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Approved this Month 2. Net change by Change Orders .... ...........:.....15 8 .21 Number .Date Approved 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ............p 2 , 2 _ 1 TOTALS S. RETAINAGE: Net thane by Chan a Orders The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowiedge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shownhereinisnowdue. CONTRACTOR: 7By: Date: Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. 1 . ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM .......................12 n n n _ n o 2. Net change by Change Orders .... ...........:.....15 8 .21 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2) ..............282o236-21 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ............p 2 , 2 _ 1 Column G on G703) S. RETAINAGE: a. 0 % of Completed Work $ - 2 R - 2 2 * - Column D + E on G703) b. -. % of Stored Material $ Column F on Total Retainage (Line Sa + 5b or Total in Column 1 of G703) .................. . ..28 223 G. - TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAiNAGE ... . ...............2,5„ „ 2 59 Line 4 less Line S Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate) .........2.47 , 3 97 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......R.. to iit.a go......2 8 . 2 2 3 . 6 2 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE .............0 . 0 0 Line 3 less Line 6) ....,......._. State of: /'t , u PUt —`" Subscribed and sworn to befo mt . ..'. (119 Notary Public: `` •' MY commission ex 6.7-9 @L-.d&L ' PMyCommissionex ire : ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE F PAYMENT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief - the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AIA DOCUMENT 0702 • AI'i'LICATION AND ct iznricm rOR PAYMENT • MAY 1%3 EDITION • AIA• • o; 1983 11* AM! RICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NtW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 AMOUNT CERTIFIED .................................. $ ALL'S I %f4v ". — Attach explan io if am certified differs from the amount applied for.) ARCHITECT - LA - Y• Date. This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is 4aylble only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. 4- el I /CC; 01 WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright Iaws and is subject to legal pros Ion. / G702 -1983 12• i AGENDA NO. T"*119 AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: RE: 4DATE. Cit Mana Finance Director Tb ppotion by. CoU4011 16 1ndorse Modifle d- Raj ected Date---- COMMUNITY CENTER 11-30-94 INCOME STATEMENT December 12, 1994 The resolution adoptin bud policies for the communit center provided that the income statement be placed on the Council a ever three months for public discussion. Attached is a cop of this resolution and a cop of the income statement for the period ended 11-30-94. The income statement indicates that for November there was a net loss of $32,35I. This compares with a net loss of $28,770 for October. November operatin revenues were $66,960 which was $18,486 and 38% hi than October. Most of the increase was in revenues from memberships and dail fees which increased b $157256. November operating expenses were $114,212 which was $36,091 and 46% hi than October. Most of the increase was in maintenance expenses which increased b 29,779. This was due primaril to the receipt of the first bills for utilities which covered approximatel two months. Dependin on the weather, utilities expense for December should be approximatel $13,000 less than November utilities expense of 27,000 which covered two months. November non-operatin revenues included an 8,000 donation from Coca-Cola and a rebate of $7,013 from NSP for installation of an ener efficient air conditionin chiller. The second pa of the November financial statement indicates cash flow for the Communit Center Operations Fund. Durin November, cash receipts exceeded disbursements b $33,929. This caused the cash balance for the fund to increase to 161,249. PAAGN\cdric Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Keppen Nays: Rossbach t V.UDGET POLICY FOR COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS FUND ' City Manager McGuire explained that the proposed policy allows the Community Center to operate With a "bottom line" philosophy. The total revenue and expenditures are not important.. What is important is the net income. Mayor Bastian indicated that the resolution be revised to include a provision that the Community Center income statement be .placed on the. Council agenda quarterly for discussion. Following some discussion, Mayor Bastian moved that revised Resolution No. 94 -09- j 01 be adopted to formalize this Community Center - oDerations Rolicy and adopt an initial net income budget for 4994. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and was approved. RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET POLICIES FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS AND ADOPTION OF INITIAL 1994 BUDGET WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Maplewood to operate the Community Center as a business, and WHEREAS, it is important that management have the flexibility to incur expenses as needed so that customers can be properly served, and WHEREAS, the Finance Department will prepare and distribute a monthly income statement to monitor . the financial transactions for the Community Center operations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the annual budget for the Community tenter Operations Fund consist solely of a planned net income amount, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Center income statement be placed on the Council agenda quarterly for discussion, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City management staff shall have the flexibility to incur expenses as needed so that customers can be properly served, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the budgeted 1994 net income for the Community Center Operations Fund be set at $15,810. Ayes: All mil. INSURANCE FOR OPEN MEETING. LAW Mayor Bastian moved that the insurance coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for open meeting law defense costs be obtained for the estimated premium cost of 11,600. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and was approved. Ayes: All 4 C: City Council, City Manager, Park and Recreation Director, Community Center Manager CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,MINNESOTA Community Center Operations Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings November 30,1994 FROG.November YTD Percent of ActualN0.Actual Actual Estimate to Estimate Operating Revenues: 001 Memberships and daily fees 48 82,570 276,900 29.8%002 Concessions 8 16,592 12 136.0%021 022 Theater fees Banquet room fees 90) 4,356 90) 6 4,400 7,800 2.0% 80.1%023 Day care fees 694 1 0 N/A061 062 Pool fees Gym fees 866 3 10 31.3% 063 Multi - purpose room fees 343 2,270 742 3 1,600 8,850 46.4% 34.4%064 Exercise fees 818 1,625 10,200 15.9% Total 66 115,429 331,950 34.8% Operating Expenses: 001 002 Office Admission desk /concessions 28 19,380 72 31,931 105 26 69.0% 121.0%021 022 Theater Banquet room 0 757 0 757 6 1 0.0% 63.1%023 024 Day care Senior lounge 3,842 11 5,640 197.9% 061 Pool 0 11,448 66 28,597 200 44,020 33.0% 65.0%062 063 Gym Multi- purpose room 1 54 4 54 4,120 1 105.6% 4.9%064 Exercise programs 6 7 12,000 59.2%Maintenance 41,943 58,527 107 54.3% Total 114 215,348 314,140 68.6% Operating income (loss) before other revenues (expenses)47,252)99 17,810 561.0% Other revenues (expenses): Interest on investments 266 846 0 N/ADonations880N/AMiscellaneousrevenues770N/ADepreciation000N/AContingency002,000)0.0%Investment management fees 63)136)0 N/AMiscellaneousexpenses315)245)0 N/A Net Total 14 16 2,000)800.7% Income (loss) before operating transfers (32,351)83,906)15,810 530.7% Operating transfers in: From Charitable Gambling Fund 0 5,625 0 N/A Net income (loss)32 78,281)15,810 495.1% Retained earnings - beginning 45,930)0 0 N/A Retained earnings - ending 78,281)78,281)15,810 495.1% C: City Council, City Manager, Park and Recreation Director, Community Center Manager Sources of cash: Net income (loss) Add depreciation Deferred revenue Increase in liabilities Total Applications of cash: Purchase of fixed assets CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Community Center Operations Fund Statement of Sources and Applications of Cash November 30, 1994 Percent November YTD of Actual Actual Actual Estimate to Estimate 32,351) (78,281) 15,810 - 495.1% 0 0 0 NSA 26,981 172 0 N/A 39 67,469 0 N/A 33,929 161 15,810 1019.9% Net increase (decrease) in cash Beginning cash balance Ending cash balance 0 0 0 N/A 33,929 161,249 15,810 1019.9% 127,320 0 0 N/A 161,249 161,249 15,810 1019.9% AGENDA N0. Q Action by, Caunail s) AGENDA REPORT Endoriss`d.......».. TO: City Manager 1jejeoted- --- --• - Date FROM: Assistant City Manager r RE: RAMSEY/WASHINGTON COUNTIES CABLE COMMISSION DATE: December 12, 1994 INTRODUCTION The Ramsey/Washington Counties Cable Commission is composed of twelve different communities. A special meeting of the elected officials and administrators from all twelve communities has been scheduled for Thursday, January 5, 1995, 7 p.m. at White Bear Lake City Hall. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the franchise renewal process with Meredith Cable and the structure of the Commission in 1998 when the current joint powers agreement expires. Since more than two Councilmembers may be present at the meeting, staff is recommending that this meeting be formally announced. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council announce the Cable Commission meeting on Thursday, January 5, 1995, 7 p.m. at White Bear Lake City Hall. MEMORANDUM TO: Elected Officials and Administrators /Managers representing members communities of the Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable Commission FROM: Ad Hoc Committee to study cable franchise renewal: Gretchen Maglich, Maplewood; Ellen Richter, White Bear Lake; and Ron Rogstad, Oakdale DATE: December 12, 1994 RE: MEETING TO DISCUSS ISSUES REGARDING RAMSEY/WASHINGTON SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION AND FRANCHISE RENEWAL PROCESS The purpose of this memo is to invite the Mayor, members of the City Council, and the City managers /administrators to attend a meeting about the future of the Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable Commission (R/WSCC). When: Thursday, January 5 Time: 7:00 p.m. -10:00 p.m. Location: White Bear Lake City Council Chambers Moderator: Mr. Greg Moore, Executive Director, Northwest Cable Commission and Community Television In July of this year, an ad hoc committee of staff members from Maplewood, Oakdale and White Bear Lake agreed to prepare a report identifying the present organizational structure of the Ramsey/Washington Suburban Cable Commission (R/WSCC), issues regarding the upcoming franchise renewal process, and alternative courses of action. The report, which was sent to each of the member R/WSCC communities, provides background information and was meant to serve as a primer for discussion of impending governance and franchise policy issues. As a follow -up to that report and an effort to initiate discussion regarding the preferred courses of action of each of the member communities, a meeting will be held at the White Bear Lake City Hall on Thursday, January 5, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Greg Moore, Executive Director of Northwest Cable Commission has agreed to facilitate the meeting. Northwest Cable Commission represents the communities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Golden Valley, Maple Grove, New Hope, Osseo, Plymouth, and Robbinsdale. Mr. Moore has been involved in cable franchise administration since the mid -1970s and is quite familiar with related issues and trends. It was considered to be in the best interest of member communities for a disinterested yet knowledgeable part to moderate the meeting. After a brief summary of the technical and p rocedural issues surrounding the franchise renewal process, Mr. Moore will moderate discussion of the issues and concerns with the joint powers agreement and franchise renewal p rocess raised by each of the member communities. The current cable franchise agreement between the Cable Commission and the cable television company, Meredith Cable, expires in 1998. In addition thep joint powers agreement that created the Commission terminates in 1998. Federal law states that the cable company may initiate the process of franchise renegotiation threeg years prior to the franchise expiration. This means that as early as next May, Cable mayy request to speak to someone about renegotiating the franchise. The current joint powers agreement that created the R/WSCC does not give the Commission the authority to negotiate a new franchise. So, the purpose of the January meeting is tworYg fold: 1) discuss whether or not the Cable Commission will be given the authority togY renegotiate the franchise agreement, and if not, how do the member communities wish to proceed; and 2) establish a process to develop the structure of a new joint powersp entity to succeed the current Cable Commission in 1998. In preparation for this meeting, we recommend that you review the Ad Hoc Committee's CABLE FRANCHISE RENEWAL study report sent to you in September. We hope to see you at the meeting on January 5th. It is important that your communityisrepresentedatthismeeting. The outcomes of the meeting will likely affect the future of the Cable Commission. RSVP - If you plan to attend, please call Joyce Jacobs at White Bear Lake itC y Hall byDecember30th, 429 -8526. 2 AGENDA ITEM "lot TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer AGENDA REPORT SUBJECT: Gervais Avenue StuY DATE: December 14, 1994 Aotion by , Counc dare Modified Rej eoted.. Vat Attached are the pages from a previous feasibility Ystud that addresses Gervais Avenue improvements. Cost estimate is based on a 40 - foot wide street with concrete curb and gutter and a minimal amount of storm sewer. The estimated construction costost ins April 1993 -was $202,000. When ' indirect, costs for administration engineering fiscal. and legal fees are added, the cost for the entire project is estimated at $270,000. The location of the road, and therefore the cost estimate, not address the loading dock situation along the south side of Gervais Avenue. If Northern Wholesale does not Yaltertheiroperations, trucks unload or loading 'at the facility will continue to encro into the driving lanes of the street. l have tanked to representatives from Northern Wholesale. It is their opinion that their operation cannot be changed or altered topg alleviate the problems at the loading docks. If the city improves the street andp . prevents Northern Wholesale from utilizing their loading area i its present condition, it is the opinion of the owners that they would have to relocate the business. If the city council wishes to pursue this project, they should order an update to the previous feasibility study. It is estimated that a budget of $1 000 would be sufficient to bring this project to public hearing. KGH jc Attachment FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR STREET AND UTZI.ITY IIvIPROVEIIENTS ON TRUNK HIGHWAY 61 FRONTAGE ROADS MAPLEWOOD, IOTA PROJECT 93-02 APRIL 1993 I hereby certify that this Feasibility Study was written by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Terry J. Mau .E. Reg. No, 15316 665 - 404 -10 Date FEAS.66 AX 66S- 004-10 The estimated costs for the proposed improvements shown by Exhibit 14 will be discussed in detail in the Implementation Considerations section of this report. Ee VA1S__ wing Conditions Gervais Avenue is not a MnDOT TH 61 frontage goad; however, it is adjacent tog the northwest frontage road and is in poor condition. The 0.25 mile road is a bituminous paved surface approacimatel y t,tdrty feet wide and does not contain curb and gutter. Gervais Avenue is located within a sixty-six foot right-of-way andtYgy serves as an access street to the existing commercial business and two residential properties. The existing pavement contains numerous Po tholes and distressed areas. Due to the narrow width of the road and the absence of any curb, largeg vehicles drive off of the existing pavement while accessing the loading docks located along the south side of Gervais. Parking restrictions are not posted along either side of the frontage road; however, parking along the south side of Gervais Avenue is not feasible due to the numerous loading docks. In order to P rovide adequate off - street parking for their employees, Twin City Vending rents the gravel parking lot north of Gervais Avenue directly cross from their building,Y g Storm water runoff is collected by two sets of catch basins located at the west end of the street, which are connected by a fifteen -inch P ipe that flows east to an eighteen -inch pipe. The eighteen -inch pipe conveys the runoff south to the northwest frontage road. The runoff is joined by flows from the existing twenty- four inch pipe that collects runoff from the northwest frontage road. This combined flow is then routed west to an existing thirty -six inch pipe that outlets to Keller Existing utilities include asixteen -inch watermain that extends from the northwest frontage road to the west end of Gervais Avenue. This line is looped to the existing twelve -inch line that serves Carsgrove Meadows 1st and 2nd Additions. Currently, an eight -inch clay sanitary sewer collects sewage from properties FMAs -W.0% -14- 665- 004-10 adjacent to Gervais Avenue and routes it east to the eight -inch pipe under the northwest frontage road. hcoposed. TmProvem eats It is proposed that Gervais Avenue be reconstructed to a forty-foot wide street section, including bazrier curb and gutter. The additional width will allow commercial vehicles adequate space for gig access to the numerous loading docks. The barrier curb will help confine the heavy vehicles to the paved surface. Exhibit 13 shows the typical section for the proposed 9 -ton design. Gervais Avenue is currently a dead -end street and heavy vehicles that drive P ast their respective loading docks have very limited space available to make a U -turn. Therefore, it is proposed that a turnaround be constructed at the west end of Gervais Avenue, Within a forty -five foot by one- hundred foot easement that must be obtained. The turnaround will be designed to maintain access to the existing parking lot located on the west side of the Hermanson Dental Lab. The ro sedPPo alignment is shown by Exhibit 10. Parking could be allowed on the north side of Gervais Avenue, if an additional four feet of pavement is provided. The additional width, if this option is chosen would increase the project cost for Gervais Avenue by approximately 10 %. Currently, storm water runoff is collected by four (4) catchbasins located at the west end of Gervais Avenue. The widening of the road will require the removal of the existing structures and replacement with new catchbasins located at the proposed curb line. It is proposed that additional fifteen -inch pipe be extended westerly, to collect runoff from the proposed turnaround. The storm water will be conveyed to the existing eighteen -inch pipe that outlets to the existing ditch north of the northwest frontage road. Catchbasins installed at the intersection of Gervais Avenue and the frontage road would collect runoff from the east side of Gervais Avenue and direct flow to the proposed sedimentation pond located at the south end of the northwest frontage road. is s- M5.004 _15- 60-004-10 The existing hydrants adjacent to Arcade Street do not meet existing City standards and should he replaced. The existing sanitary services are clay and will be replaced. The :estimated costs for the ro sed improve • .P ,Po P ements shown by achlbit 10 be discussed in detail in the Implementationpmentation Considerations section of this repo N. EW P iF.N'TATION CoNs13DERTIONS A.QN3UWAL-BV While implementation of an cnstruction prod ect impacts the immediate area, the temporary negative effects of development . ' •P t unl.l be rrulu by .using appropriate erosion control .methods during construction such as silt fencing. The use of sedimentation nds reduce 'P ce the impact of surface runoff to Keller Lake, B. PERMTTS/EASENIENTSAND LAND ACOZT«jTION The proposed improvements will require the following permits and easements: 10 Water extension permit from the Minnesota Health Department, 2• Sanitary sewer permit from the Minnesota pollution Control Agency and Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, 3. Permits from the Ramsey- Washington Watershed District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 40 Temporary and permanent easements will be required for the proposed street and utility improvements. C. TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROPERTY ACC Traffic flow to the retail shops and the commercial properties will have to be maintained if the proposed improvements are constructed. Phasing of the work will most likely be required. In anticipation of this, additional costs have been included for traffic detouring during construction. PEAS- W.00d 16 " 66s -0%-10