HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 12-12 CIty Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, December 12, 1994
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 94 -25
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 94 -23, (November 28, 1994)
2. Minutes of Meeting 94 -24, (November 29, 1994)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA. PRESENTATIONS
F. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City
Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these
items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Conditional Use Permit Review, 1770 McMenemy Street (St. Paul Hmong Alliance Church)
3. 1995 On -Sale, Off -Sale and Club Liquor License Renewals
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.: Public Hearing on Proposed 1995 Budget and Property Taxes
P Y
a. Citizen Comments
b. Council Discussion
c. Resolution to Adopt the 1995 Budget
d. Resolution to Adopt Tax Levy for 1995
2. 7:20 P.M.: Conditional Use Permit Revision: 1255 Cope Ave. (Northern Hydraulics)_
3. 7:30 P.M.: 2410 Stillwater Road (Gethsemane Lutheran Church)
a. Conditional Use Permit
b. Variance
c. Design Plans
4. 7:40 P.M.: 1929 Edgerton Street (Edgerton Elementary School)
a. Conditional Use Permit Revision
b. Variance Termination
c. Setback Variance
d. Design Plans
e. No Parking Signs
5. 8:00 P.M.: Planning Fees Ordinance (2nd Reading - Requires at least 4 votes)
6. 8:15 P.M.: Sign Size Variance: 1793 Beam Avenue (Maplewood II Movies - United
Artists)
7. 8:30 P.M.: Liquor License - Gulden's
H. AWARD OF BIDS
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Mapleleaf Estates
a. Land Use Plan and Zoning Map Changes (requires at least 4 votes)
b. Street Vacations (requires at leavt 4 votes)
c. Utility Easement Vacation
d. Cul -de -sac Width Variance
e. Preliminary Plat
2. Moratorium on Clinics
3. Wetland Ordinance
4. Open Space Site #140
5. Carver Elementary School /Community Center Expansion
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Open Space Site #103C
a. Approval to Purchase
b. Land Use Plan Change
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2
3.
4.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Open Space Progress
2.
3.
N ADJOURNMENT
}
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, November 28 1994
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
,Meeting No 94 -23
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian.
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL:
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present
Sherry.Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present
D APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting of November 7, 1994
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes_ of Counci 1,IManager
Meeting of November 7 1994 as presented.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian
Ayes - all
2 Minutes of Meeting 94 -22 (November 14, 1994)
Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minutes of Meeting -No. 94 -22
(November 14, 1994) as corrected:
Page 12, Item I,1,c: G Mach (not Fred)
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
Ll Ramsey County Parks & Recreation Communication
L2 Trailers
L3 Christmas Tree Sites
L4 RCCLG By -Laws Change
L5 Mayor's Update
M2 December Meetings
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
1
Ayes - all
11 -28 -94
EA. _APPOI /PRESE
1. HRA Appointment
a. Mana McGuire presented the
staff report.
b. Thomas Schiff, the applicant,
appeared before the
Council.
c. Ma Bastian moved to appoint
Thomas:Schiff to fill the vacanc
on the
Housin and R e develo pm ent Authority (HRA),.term e xpiring
% in March,
1996.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen
A
Mayor Bastian,
Councilmembers
Allenspach, Koppen, Rossbach
Na
none
Abstain
Councilmember
Carlson
F. CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Carlson moved,seconded by Ma Bastian: a all, to approve the
consent ,----a items F-1-thru F-9 as. recommended .
1.. Approval of Claims
Approved the followin claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 524,010.44 Checks #3318 - #3407.
Dated 11-01-94 thru 11-16-94
$ 4242344..08 Checks, #15512 - #15682
Dated 11-28-94
94893.54.52 Total,Accounts Pa
PAYROLL: $ 243,658.04 Pa Checks #44008 thru #44265
Dated 11-18-94
$ 489987.15 Pa Deduction Checks #44270 thru
.#44287 dated 11-18-94
$ 2929645.19 'Total Pa
$192409999.71 GRAND TOTAL
2. Nature Center and Communit Center Donations
Accepted with thanks the donation of a seven-foot full decorated Christmas
tree (valued at $1,000) for the Communit Center from the North St. Paul
Tar Store.
Accepted with thanks a $100 donation from Mr. and Mrs. Robert Beuhrin for
the Nature Center, and authorized placin those funds in the Nature Center
Pro Supply Account (101,604-000-4120)0
3. Conditional Use Permit Review: 743 North Century Avenue (Holida Express Station)
Reviewed and renewed approval of the. Conditional Use Permit for Holida
Express at 743 North Century Avenue. The permit will not be reviewed a
unless a problem develops.
4. Final Plat: Amber Hills First Addition
Approved the Amber Hills First Addition final plat, creatin fourteen lots
for houses and several outlots along Valley View Avenue, west of Sterling
Street.
2 11-28-94
5. .Contingency Request: Data Processing
Authorized a budget transfer of.$16 from the Data Processing Retained
Earnings account to the Data Processing Part -time Wages account to cover the
labor, costs.associated with the installation of the new computer system.
6. Gambling License - Change of Manager: Merrick Companies, Inc. (Garrity's)
Approved the application of Merrick Companies., Inc. for licensing Michelle
(Shelly) Juergens, to be their new gambling manager at Garrity 9 s Lounge,
1696 White Bear Avenue,
7. Liquor License - Change of Manager: Red Rooster
Approved the liquor license application of Mark Weinand and Mary Ann Baker
far Red Rooster Lounge at 2029 Woodlynn Avenue.
80 Certification to Property Taxes - House Deimol i ti on : 1832 "Gervai s Court
94 -11 -137
CERTIFICATION OF DEMOLITION COSTS TO PROPERTY TAXES - 1832 GERVAIS COURT
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following costs associated with
demolition of the property at 1832 Gervais Court, for certification against
the tax levy of said property owner for the year 1994, collectible in 1995
and 1996, and to be paid in full by December 1, 1996, and which includes
interest.at the rate of eight percent (8%).
Demolition Costs (Frattalone Excavating) $5
Building Inspector 51.06
Health Official 139 50
Police Officer 55.69
Attorney's Fees 2
County Administration Fee 5.00
$7,797.10
Interest - 1st year 623.77
Interest - 2nd year 311.88
$8,732.75
Total amount to be certified: $8,732.75
9. Certification to Property Taxes - Unpaid Bill for North St. Paul Water
94 - 11 - 138
CERTIFICATION OF UNPAID WATER BILL TO PROPERTY TAXES
RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent water
service charges, for certification against the tax levy of said property
owner for the year 1994, collectible in 1995, and which includes interest at
the rate of eight percent (8X) on the total amount for one year.
PIN 02- 29- 22 -42- 0018 -2
Total amount to be certified:
3
E 99.88
2.50 Administration Fee
a 102.38
11 -28 -94
G PUBLIC HEARINGS
. and Rezoning: Ma s
P.M. P.M.). Comprehensive Plan Change a 9 lewood Townhouse P 1. 7.00
(11th A venue and Ariel Street) - Requires at Least 4
Votes
•
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public - hearing regarding the
,
She
ter Corporation to build d 31 rental town house units
.proposal by The p
at the
n corner of Eleventh Avenue and Ariel Street.
b Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
• Olson resented the C. Director of Community Development specifics of the p P
report.
d. Commissioner Kevin Kittridge presented the Planning Commission report.
opened the public hearing, c
e. Mayor Bastian ope alling for proponents or p 9
opponents. The following persons were heard. .
Garrett Carlson, Representing Shelter Corporation
Mike Jordan, Winsor- Faricy, Architect for Shelter Corporation
Patricia Kamrath, 2499 Ariel Street
Vicki Smoyer, 2599 Ariel Street
Louis Kamrath, 2499 Ariel Street
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
g o y y ex
. City Attorn Kell lained the legal constrictions relative to this request
P
h. Councilmember Rossbach moved to table this issue to the December 19
Council Meeting in order to address the issues raised in this hearin .
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
2. 8:15 P.M. (8:27 P.M.): Maplewood Retail Addition
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
proposal by Marc Kruger to redevelop the land between White Bear Avenue
and Ariel Street, and between 11th Avenue and Highway 36, a total of
34.1 acres, for multiple dwelling and retail purposes.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Kittridge presented the Planning Commission report.
e. Boardmember Roger Anitzberger presented the Community Design Review Board report.
f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard:
Mark Kruger, 1139 5th Ave. N. Plymouth, the applicant
John Deitrich, ROK Associates
Zelma Pitzl, 2005 Castle Avenue
Jerry Brink, 2462 White Bear Ave.
Darrel Berkowitz, 2428 White Bear Avenue
(also for sister Judy and brother Jerry Berkowitz)
Edmund Bergren, 2456 White Bear Avenue
4 11 -28 -94
Carl LeVake, 2394 White Bear Avenue
Nina Hardenbrook, 1970 Gervais
Mike Kural1e, 2066 Flanders Road
Carl Keller, Manager of Townhomes in North St. Paul
Rusty Gundleson, Forest Products Supply, 1915 Castle Avenue
Roger Anitzberger, 1949 Castle
Bruce Bo'J e, Western Professional Services, regarding intersection lights
g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Land Use Plan Change Cat least 4 votes)
h. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
94 -11 -140
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE - LBC, R.71 AND NC TO BC AND R -3M
.WHEREAS, Marc Kruger applied for a change to the City's land use plan. This
change is from LBC (limited business commercial), R -1 (single dwellings) and NC
(neighborhood commercial) to BC (business commercial) and R -3M (medium density
multiple dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property between White Bear Avenue and
Ariel Street.between Highway 36 and 11th Avenue in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The
City staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent
notices to the surround i ng. property owners. The Planning Commission gave
everyone at the .hearing a chance to speak and present written
statements., The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve this 1-and use plan change for ninety days contingent on the
County approving a traffic plan.
2. On November 28, 1994, the City Council discussed the land use plan
change. They considered reports and recommendations from the Planning
Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
change for the following reasons:
1. The developer is proposing to develop this site for commercial uses.
2. With the traffic improvements proposed, the streets w i l l have sufficient
vehicular capacity to handle the traffic from this development.
3. The proposed commercial development would be compatible with the nearby
land uses on White Bear and 11th Avenues.
4. The proposed commercial development would be more compatible with
traffic and conditions on White Bear and 11th Avenues than the existing
homes.
5. The proposed R -3M classification would be compatible with the existing
multiple dwellings east of Ariel Street.
6. The existing property owners are in favor.
5 11 -28 -94
Approval is for 239 days. At the end of that time the City may change the land use
back to its current designation if the developer has not started construction.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Zoning Map Change (at least 4 votes)
i. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
94 -11 -140
ZONING MAP CHANGE FROM R -1 AND NC TO BC AND R -3
WHEREAS, Marc Kruger, representing RLK Associates, applied for a change in the
..zoning map from F (farm residential)., R -1 (single dwellings) and NC (neighborhood
commercial) to BC (business commercial) and R -3 (multiple dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property between White Bear Avenue and Ariel
Street between Highway 36 and 11th Avenue in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22. The
legal descriptions are:
The South 1/8 of the North 8/10 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of
the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22, except the East
287.98 thereof, subject to White Bear Avenue, and
That part of the South 1/7 of the North 7/10 of the Southwest quarter of
the Southeast quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 29,
Range 22, lying Easterly of White Bear Avenue, according to. the United
States Government Survey thereof; except the Easterly 287.98 feet thereof
an d.subject to the right of the State of Minnesota in the Westerly .03 acres
more or less thereof, and
A1.1 that part of the South 1/6 of the North 6/10 lying East of White Bear
Avenue of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 11, Township 21, Range 22, and
That part of the South 1/3 of the North 3/10 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22
Easterly of White Bear Avenue, and
South 1/10 of North 4/10 of that part of the Southwest 1/4 of Southeast 1/4
of Northwest 1/4 Easterly of White Bear Avenue in Section 11, Township 29,
Range 22 and
All that part of the South 1/5 of the North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22,
g
l y in East of the center line of White Bear Avenue; excepting therefrom the
said d portion thereof taken for White Bear Avenue, and
The East 1/2 of the North 1/10 and the East 112 of the South 1/2 of the
North 1/5 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22; AND North 1/5 of West 1/2 of Southwest
1/4 of Southeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 Section 11, Township 29,, Range 22,
excepting that art lying west of White Bear Avenue, and except the North
p 9 p
12.5 feet, and
The West 77.98 feet of the East 287.98 feet of the South 1/4 of the North
4/5 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
6 11 -28 -94
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 AND that part of the South 1/5 of the
: Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11,
Township 29, Range 22, lying Easterly original White Bear Avenue, except the
Westerly 300 feet thereof and except the East 210 feet thereof; subject to
the rights of the public in highway (Eighth Avenue) over. the Southerly 33
thereof, and
The West 300 feet of the North 3/4 of the South 1/5 lying East of White Bear
Avenue, except road commonly known as Eighth Avenue NW, of the Southwest 1/4
of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range
22, and
The West 85 feet of the East 210 feet of the South 4/10 of the Southwest 1/4
of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range
22, and
The East 210 feet, except the West 85 feet thereof, of the following: The
South 1/7 of the North 7/10 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4, Easterly of White Bear Avenue, Section 11, Township 29, Range
22 West; AND the North 3/4 of the South 1/5 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 11, Township 29,, Range 22 West
lying easterly of original White Bear Avenue, excepting the Westerly 300
feet thereof; AND the East 287.98 feet of the South 1/8 of the North 8/10 of
the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11,
Township 29, Range 22, and
.The Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11
Township 29, Range 22, and
The. North 100 feet of Lot 1; the North 100 feet of Lot 2; all in Castle
,Acres, and
Lot l except the North 100 feet thereof; Lot 2 except the North 100 feet
thereof; all in Castle Acres, and
Lots 3 4 and 5, Castle Acres, and
Lot 6, except the North 264 feet, Castle Acres, and
The North two hundred sixty -four (N.264) feet of Lot six (6), Castle Acres,
according to the plat thereof filed of record in the office of the Registrar
of Titles within and for said County, and
Lot 7 except the North 310 feet thereof, Castle Acres, and
The North 310 feet of Lot 7, Castle Acres, and
The South 1/2 of Lot 8, Castle Acres, and
The North one -half (N. 1/2) of Lot Eight (8), Castle Acres, according to
the plat thereof filed or record in the office of the Registrar of Titles
within and for said County, and
The South Three Hundred Ninety -four (S.394) feet of Lot Nine (9),, Castle
Acres, according to the plat thereof filed of record in the office of the
Registrar of Titles within and for said County, and
Lot 10 except the Northerly 100 feet thereof, Castle Acres, and
Lot 11 except the Easterly 50 feet thereof, Castle Acres, and
7 11 -28 -94
The Northerly 100 feet of Lot 10; the Easterly 50 feet of Lot 11; all in Castle
Acres, and
Lot Twelve (12), Castle Acres, according to the plat thereof filed for
record in the office of the Registrar of Titles within and for said County,
and
L Castle Acres, and
Lot 14, Castle Acres, and
All that part of the two following - described tracts: Tract 1. Lot 15
except the.East 125 feet; Tract 2. Lot 16 except.the East 125 feet; which
lies Northeasterly of the following- described line: Beginning at a point on
the north line of said Lot 15, distant 290 feet West of the Northeast corner
4.
of the said Lot, thence running Southeasterly to a point on the East line of
.the second above - described tract, distant 50 feet South of the Northeast
corner thereof and there terminating; all in Castle Acres, and
The East 125 feet of Lots 15 and 16, Castle Acres, subject to that portion,
if.any, q
ac wired by the State of Minnesota for Highway purposes and
WHEREAS, the history of this change.is as follows:
1. On November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this change for ninety days, contingent on the County
approving a traffic plan.
2. On November 28, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to.the
surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an
opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of
the zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract. from the
use of neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood,
and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the
proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of
the community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical,
efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities,
such as public water, sewers, police and fire protection and schools..
Approval is for 239 days. At the end of that time the City may change the zoning
back to its current designation if the developer has not started construction.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
8 11 -28 -94
Conditional Use Permit
Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
94 - 11 - 141
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - OUTDOOR STORAGE, SALES AND DISPLAY
WHEREAS? Marc Kruger, Esq . , applied for a conditional use permit to have
exterior storage, display, sale or distribution of goods or materials in the
BC (business commercial) zoning district.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to the garden center of the home care store
in the Maplewood Retail Addition on White Bear Avenue between Highway 36 and
,11th Avenue. The legal description is:
Lot 2, Block One, Maplewood Retail Addition.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this permit.
2. On November 28, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City
staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a
I hance to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated
to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of
Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3.. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process materials, equipment or
methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental,
disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of
excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air
pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets
and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or
proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures,
water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would. not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
9 11 -28 -94
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's
natural and scenic features into the development design.
9.
The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City stamped
October 19, 1994. The Director of Community Development may approve
minor changes.
2. The store shall use the outside storage and display within 239 days of
the Council's approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend
this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in 239 days.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Street Vacations
k. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
94 - 11 142
STREET VACATIONS - GERVAIS AVENUE AND CASTLE AVENUE
WHEREAS, Marc Kruger, representing RLK Associates, applied for the vacation of
the following described streets:
1. That part of Gervais Avenue between the east right -of -way line of White
Bear Avenue and the west right -of -way line of Ariel Street in Section
11, Township 29, Range 22.
2. Castle Avenue south from Gervais Avenue to the Highway 36 right -of -way
in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of these vacations is as follows:
1. On November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve these vacations.
2. On November 28, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing.. The City
staff ublished a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to
p
the abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing
a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also
p
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property
will go to the following abutting properties:
1. Lots 1 -11 of Castle Acres
2. 1937 Gervais Avenue East
The West 77.98 feet of the East 287.98 feet of the South 1/4 of the
North 4/5 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4
10 11 -28 -94
of Section 11, Township 29, Range 22; AND that part of the South 1/5
J of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 11, Township 29, Range. 22, lying Easterly original White
Bear Avenue, except the Westerly 300 feet thereof, and except the
East 210 feet thereof; subject to the rights of the public in
` highway (Eighth Avenue) over the Southerly 33 thereof.
3. NE Corner of WBA and Gervais
The West 300 feet of the North 3/4 of the South 1/5 lying East of White Bear
Avenue, except road commonly known as Eighth Avenue NW, of the Southwest 1/4
of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range
22.
4. 1945 Gervais Avenue East
The West 85 feet of the East 210 feet of the South 4/10 of the Southwest 1/4
of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 29, Range
22.
5. 1955 Gervais Avenue East
The East 210 feet, except the West 85 feet thereof, of the
following: The South 1/7 of the North 7/10 of the Southwest 1/4 of
the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Easterly of White Bear
Avenue, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 West; AND the North 3/4 of
the South 1/5 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4, Section 11, Township 29, Range 22 West lying easterly
of original White Bear Avenue, excepting the Westerly 300 feet
thereof; AND the East 287.98 feet of the South 1/8 of the North 8/10
of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22.
69 1971 Gervais Avenue East
The Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 11, Township 29, Range 22,
7. The north 30 feet of Block One, Dearborn Park
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
vacations for the following reasons:
1. It is i n the public interest.
2. The proposed development will provide its own access to White Bear and
11th Avenues.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
The developer shall record the resolution with the final plat. The City
shall not release the resolution until the City has approved the final plat.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
Sale of City Property
1. Counci 1 member Carlson J ntroduced the fol lowing Resol ution_ and moved
adoption:
94 11 - 143
11 11 -28 -94
AUTHORIZING SALE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Marc Kruger, representing RLK Associates, requested that the City
Council declare some Pe ro rty in Maplewood owned by the City as excess and authorize
P
it for sale.
WHEREAS, the legal description of this property is the north 30 feet of Block
One, Dearborn Park in Section 11, Township 29, Range 22. (PIN 11- 29 -22 -31 -0018)
WHEREAS, the history of this request is as follows:
1. On November 7, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council declare this ro erty as excess and authorize it for sale.
P P
2. On November 28, 1994, the City Council considered this request The City
staff p ublished a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent. notices to the
abutting property owners. The Council gave everyone at the meeti ng a
chance to speak and resent written statements. The Council also
p present
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning
Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council declare the above - described
as excess property and authorize it's sale. A prov
property. p p Y al is subject to the City
having an appraisal of the property done at the deve open's expense.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
Preliminary Plat
m. Councilmember Carlson moved, to approve the Maplewood. Retail Addition
rel i mi nar plat received by the City on October 19 1994. .Before the
City Council approves the final plat. develo er shall complete the
following conditions:
1. Si9 n an agreement with the City that guarantees that the
9
developer or contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete
all P ublic improvements and meet all City requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the
grading limits.
c. Install a traffic signal system, channelized southbound
left -turn lane and exclusive northbound right -turn lane
on White Bear Avenue at the White Bear Avenue entrance
and any other improvements required by the County. This
may require widening White Bear Avenue. The City and
County Engineers must approve these improvements before
the developer has them installed. These signals must be
operating n before the City issues the first certificate
P 9
of occupancy for the project.
2.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and
engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility,
drainage, erosion control, tree, sidewalk and parking lot plans.
The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook.
b. The grading plan shall include sedimentation basins and storm water pond
capacity as required by the Watershed Board.
c. The drainage plan shall do the following:
12 11 -28 -94
( 1) Show the size and capacity of the pi es,
storage and sedimentation basins. These s all
be consistent with Maplewood and Watershed
District storm water management plans. A
registered engineer shall prepare this plan.
(2) Where the gradi ng al 1 ows , desi gn the medi ans so
they collect storm water for infiltration.
(3) Route rooftop drainage into infiltration
devices, such as trenches, swales or pits, near
the buildings. These devices shall be designed
to mi direct discharge into the storm
water system. The.developer shall connect the
infiltration devices to the storm water system
to control the storm water from large storm
events.
(4) Design catch basins to accommodate infiltration
of storm water runoff into the ground, as
required by the City Engineer.
d. The design of the proposed_ storm water pond shall be
approved by the City Engineer and the Watershed
District. The pond shall be designed, shaped and graded
to lessen its artificial appearance. This shall include
varying the shape and grade of the side slopes and
providing for emergent vegetation and open water. If the
slopes are steeper than ten horizontal to one vertical,
the developer shall fence the pond with a five- foot -high
green vinyl -clad chain link fence. The developer shall
landscape the area around the pond and shall show this
landscaping on the landscaping plan.
e. The tree plan shall show the size, species and location
of any trees that the developer will plant as
replacement trees or existing large trees to be
preserved. There shall be at least 341 trees on the
commercial and residential sites when the project is
done (with the trees that the developer will plant and
with the large trees that they will save.).
3. Show the following changes on the final plat:
a. A drainage easement for the storm water pond in outlot
A.
b. Provide at least a twenty -foot setback between the
southerly truck turnaround area and the property line.
4.* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer.
5. Record easements or agreements for ingress, egress and utilities
with the final plat. The City staff must approve these before
the developer. records them.
6. Deed to the County the property required by the City for
additional right -of -way for White Bear Avenue.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat,
the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final
plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a
grading permit or approves the final plat.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
13 11 -28 -94
Design Plans
n. Counci i member Carlson
October 19, � 1994 and
Maplewood Retail Add. i t 1
and Boston Chicken r
oved to approve the desi
ie site plan received on
^( i ncl udi ng the grocery s
taurant) i Approval is bi
ww� wl w��lll II
I sublect to the devel oiler
plans. receive
vember 14 for
e , home care
J on the f nc
i na the fol l off
i
an
1. Submit a revised site lan to the Community Design Review Board
p, .
(CDRB) for approval. This plan shall show the following changes:
a. The parking lot north of the pet supply store shall have
a fifteen -foot setback from the west property line. If
the State does not vacate the Castle Avenue right -of -way
next to this parking lot, the developer shall change the
parking lot design to meet the fifteen - foot - setback
requi rement.
b. Revise the parking lot design as follows:
(1) All parking stalls, except..handicap- accessible
and empl parking stalls, must be at least
10 feet wide. Handicap - accessible parking
stalls must follow ADA requirements and
employee parking stalls must be at least nine
feet wide
(2) Revise the site plan as required by the County
Traffic Engineer.
C. Show an eight- foot -wide asphalt trail along the
south lot line. The trail shall run from Ariel
Street to the drive at the southwest corner of the
home store
2. Submit revised building elevations to the CDRB for approval.
These plans shall show the following:
a. The colors and materials for each building in the
project.
b. The designs for each building.
c. Brick on at least 50 percent of the north and west
elevations of the grocery store, on at least 50 percent
of the west and. south elevations of the home care store
and on 50 ercent of all elevations of the three
p
freestanding buildings. The colors and styles of all
wall and facade materials for all buildings in the
project shall be the same. The CDRB may reduce the
amount of brick if they determine that the quality of
building design does not warrant the use of brick.
d. The roof - equipment screening and trash and compactor
enclosures.
ino:
3. Submit a revised landscape plan to the CDRB for approval. This
plan shall show the following:
a. Native grasses, shrubs, trees and flowering plants on
the large slope to the east and south of the grocery and
home care stores.
b. Types of grasses, shrubs, trees and flowering plants
that are native to Minnesota and that require minimal
management. (See the memo on page 57.)
c. Plant species that are more tolerant of parking lot
conditions (including limited space, compacted soils,
higher temperatures and drier conditions) in the parking
lot islands and near the edges of the parking lots.
14 11 -28 -94
d. Plant species and materials that are tolerant of moist
conditions around the storm water pond and in the storm
water collection areas.
e. The use of more understory and shrub materials to
provide a mix of planting sizes and heights.
F. Document the number of large trees (as defined by City
Code) that will remain on the site after the contractor
has finished the grading. There shall be at least 341
trees on the site when the project is done (with those
that the developer will plant and with the large trees
that they will save.).
g. All coniferous (pine, spruce) trees shall be at least
eight feet tall.
h. Cluster plants together to provide better wildlife
habitat areas and to increase the chance of survival of
the plant materials.
4. Complete the following before the City issues a building permit:
a. Submit a certificate of survey for all new construction.
b. Have the City Engineer approve final construction and
engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading,
utility, drainage, storm water, erosion control, tree,
sidewalk and parking lot plans. These plans shall meet
the following conditions:
(1) The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation
District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook.
t2> The grading plan shall include sedimentation
basins and storm water pond capacity as
required by the Watershed Board.
(3) The drainage plan shall do the following:
(a) Show the size and capacity of the
pipes, storage and sedimentation
basins. These shall be consistent with
Maplewood and Watershed District storm
water management plans. A registered
engineer shall prepare this plan.
(b) Where the grading allows., design the
medians so they collect storm water for
infiltration.
(c) Route rooftop drainage into
infiltration devices, such as trenches,
swales or pits, near the buildings.
These devices shall be designed to
minimize direct discharge into the
storm water system. The developer shall
connect the infiltration devices to the
storm water system to control the storm
water from large storm events.
(d) Design catch basins to accommodate
infiltration of storm water runoff into
the ground, as required by the City
Engineer.
(e) The design of the proposed storm water
pond shall be approved by the City
Engineer and the Watershed District.
The pond shall be designed, shaped and
graded to lessen its. artificial
appearance. This shall include varying
the shape and grade of the side slopes
and providing for emergent vegetation
15 11 -28 -94
and open water. If the slopes are
steeper than ten horizontal to one
vertical, the developer shall fence
the pond with a five-foot-high
green vinyl -clad chain link fence.
The developer shall landscape the
area around the pond and shall show
this landscaping on the landscaping
plan.
(4) The tree plan shall show the size, species and
location of any trees that the developer will
plant as replacement trees or existing large
trees to be preserved. There shall be at least
341 trees on the commercial and residential
sites when the project is done (with the trees
that the developer will plant and with the
large trees that they will save.).
c. Record all required easements, including any wetland
buffer zones.
d. Resolve the issue of payment to the City of North St.
Paul for the use of 11th Avenue, including any payments
to City from the developer.
5. Complete the following before occupying the buildings:
a. Set new property irons with the final plat.
b. Completely restore and establish vegetative ground cover
on all boulevards to the curb.
c. Install reflectorized stop signs at all exits and where
the site driveways intersect, a handicap- parking sign
for each handicap- parking space and an address on each
building
d. Screen all roof- mounted equipment visible from streets
or adjacent property, as code requires. These screens
shall be a color and design that are compatible with the
building. The screening design and method shall be
subject to CDRB approval.
e. Construct trash dumpster and compactor enclosures as
City Code requires. All enclosures must match the
building elevation in design, material and color and
shall have 100 percent opaque gates. The final design of
the enclosures shall be subject to CDRB approval.
f. Install an in- ground sprinkler system for all landscaped
areas, except on the slopes to the east and south of the
grocery and home care stores and those areas intended to
be unmaintained. Sprinklers must not spray on a public
sidewalk.
g. Install on -site fire hydrants subject to the Fire
Marshal's requirements.
h. Stripe all parking areas, and all bituminous areas shall
have continuous concrete curb and gutter. The City
Engineer shall approve the curb and gutter design.
i. Install site security and parking lot lighting. The contractor shall
install this lighting so it does not glare onto adjacent properties or
onto public streets. In addition, the lighting shall not be directly
visible from the adjacent .residential areas. The lighting shall not
exceed one foot- candle at the east property line.
j. Provide proof that the required cross easements that
allow access between all the lots in the project have
been recorded with the County.
k. Install a traffic signal system, channelized southbound
left -turn lane and exclusive northbound right -turn
16 11 -28 -94
lane on White Bear Avenue at the White Bear Avenue
entrance and any other improvements required by the
County. This may require widening White Bear
Avenue. The City and County Engineers must approve
these improvements before the developer has them
installed.
1. Properly seal any abandoned wells on the site that are
.not already sealed.
m. Work with MTC and other appropriate agencies to secure
placement and construction to provide a bus shelter for
seniors and disabled persons to the extent that funding
is available through those sources.
6. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary
occupancy if:
a. The City decides that the work is not essential to the
public health, safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter
of credit for the required work The amount shall be
1501 of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City
to complete any unfinished work. _
70 This approval does not include the signs. The developer shall
apply to the City for a comprehensive sign plan approval for the
center. This shall. include business identification, pylon,
directional and traffic signs.
8. This approval does not include the area north of the grocery
store shown as "future expansion area."
9. This approval does not include the video or pet supply stores.
The developer shall apply to the CDRB for approval of each of
these buildings.
100 All work shall follow the approved plans with the required
changes. The Director of Community Development may approve minor
changes.
11. The developer or applicant shall repeat the design review in two
years if the City has not issued a building permit for this
project
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
AT 10:10 P.M. MAYOR BASTIAN CALLED FOR A 5- MINUTE BREAK
MEETING RE- CONVENED AT 10:15 P.M.
H. AWARD OF BIDS
NONE
17 11 -28 -94
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Purchase of Open Space Site #140
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Commissioner Kittridge,presented the Planning Commission report.
c. Counci 1 member .Carl son moved to look at acquiring the property t
Park & Recreation Funds and to contact DNR regarding co- develonR
an amenity to the trails.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes all
J NEW BUSINESS
1. Appointment to 622 Environmental Task Force
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b Councilmember Carlson moved to appoint Environmental Health, Office
Robert Wenger to serve on the 622 Environmental Task Force.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. Reduction in Retainage - Community Center Contract
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption
94 - 11 - 144
REDUCTION IN RETAINAGE FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota has heretofore ordered
the construction of a City -owned community center, Community Center Project,
and has let a contract with Adolfson & Peterson for general construction;
and
WHEREAS, the City is holding 5% of the $5,550,298 contract amount in
escrow as retainage; and
WHEREAS, the Architect and Construction Manager evaluated the
construction and acknowledged substantial completion on September 23, 1994.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and.directed
to release $150,000 of Adolfson & Peterson's escrowed retainage at FBS
Investment Services.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
18 11 -28 -94
3. Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed.Project
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Sherri Buss presented information about the Natural Resources Plan.
c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to endorse the Phalen Chain. of Lakes
Watershed Project' s Natural. Resources P1_
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
MAYOR BASTIAN LEFT THE MEETING AT 10:30 P.M.
ACTING MAYOR ROSSBACH ASSUMED THE CHAIR
4. Concept Plan for Maplewood Community Center Park
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Parks ,& Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the
.report.
NO ACTION REQUIRED
ACTING MAYOR ROSS Hz YED,TO CONTINUE THE AGENDA TO COMPLETION
SECONDED BY 000NCILMEMBER KOPPEN AYES - ACTING MAYOR ROSSBACH,
COUNCILMEMBERS ALLENSPACH
KOPPEN
NAYS - COUNCILMEMBER CARLSON
5. Carver Elementary Update
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Parks & Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the
report..
c. Councilmember Carlson moved to ,table this item to a later meeting.
Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - all
6. Frost and English Open Space Site #142: Rebate of Interest
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Carlson introduced the _following Resolution and _moved its
adoption:
}
f
19 11 -28 -94
94 - 11 - 145
REBATE OF INTEREST
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given and requested by law, City
Council met and heard and passed upon a request for abatement of interest on
assessments of seven thousand two hundred forty three dollars and forty five
cents ($7,243.45) with respect to the following described property:
Parcel I.D. #16- 29- 22 -41- 0036 -0
WHEREAS, Parcel I.D. #16- 29- 22 -41- 0036 -0 was assessed for the following
City projects:
Water Improvement Project 75- 16 -D /P 1562
Project 78 -9 -D /P 5312
Frost Avenue 83 -1 -D /P 5536
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is purchasing the property and said
closing and transfer of title to the City of Maplewood is December 1, 1994.
WHEREAS, the assessments on the above.captioned property shall be paid
off on said closing date of December 1, 1994.
WHEREAS, if the assessments are not paid by November 15, 1994, according
to procedure, another years' interest is added to the unpaid balance, which
said interest amounts to seven thousand two hundred forty three dollars and
forty five cents ($7,243.45).
WHEREAS, the Trust for Public Land, Seller of the above captioned
property is formally requesting that this amount be abated. The basis of
their request is as follows:
1 The sale to the City of Maplewood is occurring only fifteen days
ti after the due date for the assessment payoff.
2. The City of Maplewood is the new owner of the property and its
intended use is for open space.
3. All other assessment and connection charges associated with the
above captioned property are being paid at the closing, either
by Trust for Public Land or K & J. a Minnesota corporation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, STATE OF
MINNESOTA as follows:
1. The following interest on assessments for the following parcel
is hereby abated: Parcel I.D. #16- 29- 22- 41- 0036 -0.
2. Interest payment of $7,243.45 on the following projects is
hereby abated:
Water Improvement Project 75- 16 -D /P 1562
Project 78 -9 -D /P 5312
Frost Avenue 83 -1 -D /P 5536
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
20 11 -28 -94
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
NONE
M0 COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Ramsey County Park & Recreation Communication
a. Counci 1 member Carlson commented on the notification from Ramsey County
Parks & Recreation that they were delaying transfer of parks to
Maplewood, and wondered if this was retaliation for the City's voting
against the golf dome.
2. Trailers, Semi - Trailers
a. Councilmember Rossbach commented on the fact that semi - trailers being
parked overnight on Gervais, east of English Street.
b.. Staff will investigate.
3. Christmas Tree Lots
a. Question was raised whether anyone had received complaints about the tree lot at
White Bear Avenue and Raddatz. No one other than the Mayor had received any.
4. RCCLG By -Laws Change
a. Discussion of increased membership fees and admission of school
districts to the organization.
M.. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. open Space Progress
a. Manager McGuire reported they are closing on the KU Property on
Thursday, December 1.
b. Manager McGuire stated that they have been unable to find the location
of the 1, 600 foot deep wel l dri 11 ed i n 1888 on the Frost & Engl i sh Open
Space Site, and the Department of Health has issued a varianced based on
K &J's good faith efforts.
c. Manager McGuire reported that the Gilbert property would not be pursued
further since the owner is not interested in selling for open space and
current appraisals are much higher than our guidelines.
d. Manager Mcguire stated that the Orrin property at Rice and County Road
B is the subject of discussions between School Districts 623 and 624 as
a possible site for a school . The City may be able to enter into a
cooperative venture with the school districts to preserve a portion of
the property for open space.
21 11 -28 -94
2. December Meetings
a. Manager McGuire stated that due to the Christmas holiday, it would . be
necessary to reschedule the December 26 Council Meeting.
b. Councilmember Carlson moved to re- schedule the December 26 Council
Meeting to December 199 when there was to be a special meeting.
Seconded by Acting Mayor Rossbach Ayes - all
N. ADJOURNMENT
11:02 P.M.
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
i
22 11 -28 -94
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
7 :00 P.M., Tuesday,:Novembe.r 29, 1994
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 94 -24
A. CALL TO ORDER
A special meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Acting Mayor
Rossbach.
B PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL. CALL
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Arrived at 7:06 P.M.
George.F Rossbach, Acting Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen Arrived at 7:06 P.M.
D. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M. (7:03 P.M.): Proposed 1995 Budget and Taxes
a. Acting Mayor Rossbach convened the meeting for a public hearing
regarding the proposed 1995 Budget.
b. City Manager McGuire commented on the proposed budget.
c. Video presentation of Proposed 1995 Budget
d. Citizen Comments
1) Gary Schlomka, representing his mother, who resides at 1481
Henry Lane, stated her proposed taxes are double last years.
2) Eleanor Lido, 2510 Carver, on behalf of her deceased brother,
Ambrose Lido.
Taxes were increased because property was registered as non -
homestead.
3) Gordon Heininger, 796 E. Bellwood, questioned was portion of the
increase in taxes could be attributed to the Community Center.
Within the 1995 Budget there is no increase for operation
costs, only debt services ($9.00 per E80,000 valuation).
4) Bob Larson, 1998 Ripley, questioned why his taxes were increased
12.4 %.
His property valuation was increased by $4,000.
5) Johnathon Buesing, 1247 Kohlman Avenue, questioned whether
Community Center will sustain itself and complained about the
Motor Vehicle Department.
1 11 -29 -94
6) Scott Craven, 2935 Walter Street, stated his taxes and
valuations went up.
7) Ed Vitek, 2587 Upper Afton Road, commented on the various
increases in the 1995 Proposed Budget.
8) Orville Kemp, 1995 Laurie Road, commented on proposed tax
increase. He also commented that his neighbor is storing old
cars, hazardous waste, etc. on his property.
Staff will investigate.
9) Gary Blanchard, 640 Dorland Road South, questioned what the
impact will be on future years due to the open space referendum.
10) Jim West, 2251 Ariel, loves the Community Center, believes it
helps the property valuation. He also supports Mr. Kemp in his
problem with the neighbor.
11) John Glasow 2271 Craig Place, commented on the City putting in
sidewalks but not plowing them.
12) Kevin Berglund, 1978 Ripley, commented the Council should hold
this type of meeting more often. He also questioned how many
full time employees the City has.
The City has 138 full -time employees.
Mr. Berglund also questioned the Council on various items within
the Proposed Budget.
e. Council Discussion
Council commented on the Proposed Budget
f. Determination of Need for Continuation Hearing Scheduled for 5:00 P.M. on
December 9, 1994.
1) Mayor Bastian moved.to. close the Taxpayer Right -To -,Know hearing.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
g. Announcement of Hearing to Adopt the 1995 Budget and Taxes Payable in 1995:
7:00 P.M. on December 12, 1994 in Council Chambers
1) Council stated the hearing will be held at 7:.00 P.M. on December
12 1994 in the Council Chambers.
E. ADJOURNMENT
8:37 P.M.
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
2 11 -29 -94
AGENDA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: December 5, 1994
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims:
Ar.COUNTS PAYABLE
$ 412,164.33 Checks # 3408 thru # 3484
Dated 11 - 17 - 94 thru 11 - 30 - 94
$ 265- ?5�6 -.2 Checks # 15692 thru # 15823
Dated 12 -12 -94
$ 677,420.57 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 257,877.09 Payroll Checks # 44298 thru # 44648
Dated 12 -02 -94
-$
9374,39 Payroll Deduction check # 44653 thru
# 44671 Dated 12 -02 -94
$ 307, 251.48 Total Payroll
� 984 672 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
Iz
Attachments
FINANCE /APPRUM.AGN
•
•
Ula-1
------- ----
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF. MAPLEWOOD
PAGE I
z:3.2/02/94 13:11 VOLJCIAF:'R/(**IAECK REG"ISTER
VOUCHER/
ITEW
III M11-411' :-R D A T 1-::* NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT A MOUNT
y
3409 1 541400 MINN. TATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 541.75 541.75
3410 11/17/94 070900 BERGO. U I ST.
JIM MAPLEWOOD LOGO 200.00
MA PLEWOOD LOGO 200.00
2-0001
MAPLI:KWOOD LOGO .2-00. 00
ll(-)I'-*W -*WOOD LOGO 200.00
__KAFT_.EW00DL0Go
1 � 3411 11/17/94 53070.0 METRO AREA MANAGEMENT ASSN TRAVEL & TRAINING 12.00 12,00
'2
34:1.2 .1.1./18/94
722200 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE P/R DEDUCTION 11-04--94 P/R I V *n9� 7A
• /R DEDUCTION 11-04-94 P/R
15
27
341.3
11/18/94
86031.7
ToNoT. HOLLAND
FREIGHT CHARGES
45.00
45,.00
• `%3418
341
MJTL.D_TW3_'C(:)0RDT ATUR
........ ........
144r%" F A_ REL qF"T)F; E.8
MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE
. 39-, AZ !9 I3 ....,...._.__
9
1.1/18/94
741333
RAMSEY CO COURT
PMT 1:70R ACCIDENT DAMAGE
425.00
425..00
3417
11/18/94
070451
BELISLE. -TT
BRE
REFUND FAMILY MEMBERSHIP
250,00
25008
-00
-Wcj(]D REM
"FIRE-
ITUff%
wy
• `%3418
341
:11/18/94
540880
MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE
OCTOBER SALES TAX
9.19
• �3>!
3FRI US T A X
OCTOBER SALES TAX.
.l731*26
7. 803. 00
,111 41�
3420
I 1 19/
540175
_ t. tit. A- rTJF. n. BOTTI. l%lV3-T,'0" MDISE !::'OR-'- Rl:-%
� 5
31121
1 /18/94
500650
M. R. F". A.
TRAVEL &TRAINING
100.00
5
100.00
3422
11/18/94
110453
CARDINAL HOMEBUILDERS
REFUND. GRADING ESCROW* REC 787%,
1p000.00
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 78*75
3.42
1p003.42
47
.'5423
11/1.8/94
440371
KRZMARZICK.., CIAERYL
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 7430
I
1.n00().00 6
6
U. U-10ET)
*','T--'L;(JMML)IqIL;A I
_7211-
6
EQUT•MENT PURCHASED
1. 093.79
I" 1.4.1
69,53
U_..EPHONE'
69..53"-
6 !
IlKLEPHONEK
69.53
71
..:
T1 11-11H.Ir-111-11ONE
69.53
7
F�q
7:
TELEPHOIAE
69. 53
TE'll .. EPHONE
69.53
Tr .. rrHo
69 '"''57)
*T"I:::l ... EK1:4-110NE
69. 53
T 71.
I
I
REGISTER
12/02/9
13 M 11
V O.UC;Hk «R/t HE- K
t1i:�1.1t:a••t� f�/
J I
ITEM I
ITEM C
ChIE :a:!<
fa�•IE�.:CK
t1�. hl�ClN� _____ ...._......,,_. � ._. � .
- tl� hl�Cl� __�_�.��_- ._..._..�.,.._._.._� .._
___�.._..._.�..____� �____._.- __.__._...___
hlt.}MBER
it
SATE:
NUMBER
----
NAME
69.53
---
TE::L.E
69.53
�'1:::I...E�'
i;
W ! p .)
i
_ 1
55
I
Il
"H O H
• 3
I
i
TELE
314. A
Aii
-'HClhlE 2
26..57
r ELE"
26..57
5 14
'h•II�hiE:: 4
49.92 �
�l
•'I. ONO » 5
53 '
T L.El
: NE 5
53.14
3
3o
4-IONE . 3
322 :,,
TEL. «i
'T'I:::1..•h:I
`y C (
((�� I
I
'HONE. 5
58.20
�I
Ti;l••EI
, .HON _ 6
63 .09 3
3�1
'F•ithtE:. 3
5
TEL.E;I
,�.... .. . �,-._...,_...,....,-._-......,. �...._.. �,_.....-.,.-.-..,.. �_.,__.__... ..._..- .._- ,,.,-- .._- .... -.__,_ __- ._.,_..�. _._ _
... A
AEU
'HONE. 2
2 70. 2 0
1
TIE X
"HONE 1
167
'TI : ::1�•E:
1. 1::..1...1
J
' HONI . l
l.y t f
:
f
+IONEK 5
53.39
{
124.66
'T'E:I..:E]
IHONE
'F•IONE . 1
117 ..89
I
758
'T' E.I•..I:••!
'T'i. «1...x..
�T V .0.
3425 .11/18/94
. 190400�
DI71 -'T « OF NATURAL C• EI% :) l(JIRSI :..S.._.� __.._D1qR TI
3426
1
5- 41400
MINN S T A Tx: 'TRE:ASURE »R
S'T A TI
1'1� 111 M ..}�'�"T'I«. '�`P
1�1t`l'�`t�F
'HONE 296 ..1. G I ,`
' h1.E•.
27 0 .5 7 8 M 422 M ♦•} 5 ti �
i
Cl :*IgSlL: F L•«':E c0 PAYABI ... E 154..00 154.00
Uri I VEERS 1....E C. FEES PAYABLE 518.50
I
i1
. :1.2 ,, 288.. _ 5 12 ., 288
I
}r� ��► :� :r. �. :3/��� 9002 76 Ul%l :r. VE * .R(, :aAx.. NETWOR K SE::RV I CE' LONG D I STANC:E:: «.. OC*4 94 I 8 . 03
LONG) OCT 94 11.78 1 1.
3 429 9 1.1• /2 1 /94 720760 = '1.41.. :� Fe . *DU( T (')i 1. 1-1.8 9 PA I= OI E 2 3 4 7
i �� !�! :i: t�'! • tai i� /R
/R W.:DUC'T :I: ON :{, E 18 .... 94 PAYF'iCJIJ.. 25 v 744.02
.
P/R DEED . C T1:01 1.1. «1.f:3..94 PAYRC)l ... 1... 1.2 i1'4.. 1.7 ':its 4 9`�' ,3 �
.1 s .� .:.. a •.)S:)
REGISTER
J I
ITEM I
ITEM C
CHECK
a .
'_*SCR ION A
AMOUNT A
AMOUNT
69.53
-*HONE 6
1 1C1NE 6
69.53
•'F'li NE i
i;
W ! p .)
i
_ 1
55
I
Il
"H O H
• 3
I
i
314. A
Aii
-'HClhlE 2
26..57
•'F IONE•. 2
26..57
5 14
'h•II�hiE:: 4
49.92 �
�l
•'I. ONO » 5
53 '
: NE 5
53.14
3
3o
4-IONE . 3
322 :,,
j•tl
`y C (
((�� I
I
'HONE. 5
58.20
�I
, .HON _ 6
63 .09 3
3�1
'F•ithtE:. 3
5
39�
,�.... .. . �,-._...,_...,....,-._-......,. �...._.. �,_.....-.,.-.-..,.. �_.,__.__... ..._..- .._- ,,.,-- .._- .... -.__,_ __- ._.,_..�. _._ _
... A
AEU
'HONE. 2
2 70. 2 0
1
1_ i
"HONE 1
167
J
' HONI . l
l.y t f
:
f
+IONEK 5
53.39
124.66
IHONE
'F•IONE . 1
117 ..89
'F'IONE:: 7
758
}r� ��► :� :r. �. :3/��� 9002 76 Ul%l :r. VE * .R(, :aAx.. NETWOR K SE::RV I CE' LONG D I STANC:E:: «.. OC*4 94 I 8 . 03
LONG) OCT 94 11.78 1 1.
3 429 9 1.1• /2 1 /94 720760 = '1.41.. :� Fe . *DU( T (')i 1. 1-1.8 9 PA I= OI E 2 3 4 7
i �� !�! :i: t�'! • tai i� /R
/R W.:DUC'T :I: ON :{, E 18 .... 94 PAYF'iCJIJ.. 25 v 744.02
.
P/R DEED . C T1:01 1.1. «1.f:3..94 PAYRC)l ... 1... 1.2 i1'4.. 1.7 ':its 4 9`�' ,3 �
.1 s .� .:.. a •.)S:)
IE
^ivouc*sn/
' F�CuK
`.wunmEm DATE wumasn wnms
cI/r
OF . p�a; �o "
` p
mESCmzpTzow A MOUNT
^�*.^o -
, urz�zrzsa
225B
,
"'^L^'^"=.3 2276 96.e:1.
��---------------- ....
------~'
uTz�rrzs� z35a a5.03
3430
11/21/94
721200
PRO SOURCE' FJTNESS
OLYMPIC
FILYMFOIC PLATES
68.16
1
i4
10 . i
2v416*65
2,
17
3432
1.1/21/94
770900
RYKOFF-SECTON
COMM CTk ICE MACHINE
2.
2.
3433
11/21/94
180801
D A L E* 0. ANDERSON CONST.
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 7885
14000.00
22
2
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
3.
3v812.62
26
n7
GL DSTO CA .-RING
FAMILY/EMF7 RECEPTION
2., 51
FAMILY/EITIP REKCEPTION
366.98
2
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
3.02
3 4
UTILITIES
18.46
35
2.04
UTILITIES
:3.02
37
ip,
UTILITIES
3.02
71.19
3437
11/21/94
861614.
THE SLIDEPRINTER
PRINTS FROM SLIDES
25WOO
25.00
42
TR
645
3441
11/21/94
943500
WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE
WI SWT NOV 1994
682.8t
682.81.
IH
.25442
11/21/94
541200
MINN, STATE RET
59
1
511
3444
11/22/94
661750
NORTHEERN STATES POWER
UTILITIES 1200
4.72
UTILITIES 1902
Y
801.98
58
71
UTILITIES 51.0
7 7 25 9
36:.-:-)4
76. 42
UTILITIES 1850
109.66
70
^�*.^o -
, urz�zrzsa
225B
,
"'^L^'^"=.3 2276 96.e:1.
��---------------- ....
------~'
uTz�rrzs� z35a a5.03
fw
NN
NN�
CITY OF �wos �
- "
----_----�-.------ - - "|
REGISTE --
ITEM
NN
8 NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
o
UTILITIES 2701
151. w
014
KS 2981
TIL -U
143.41
15
UTILITIES 2991,
149.10(i)
J
W�
1 - 1
UTILITIES 618
7.46
UITILITIEK'13) 1662
9.65
20
UTILITIES 1940
98.53
21
UTILITIES 2019
35.32
22
uor 4. 01
N�
UTILITIES 2659
62..37
24
UTILITIES 2650
206.31
3 _
26
2.3445
11/22/94
541400
MINN, ST ATI TREASURER
-EES PAYABLE
STATE DRIVERS L I C F-
574"50
574..50
2 7
-- -
54 0 INN.
30
-5447
1.1/23/94
531650
METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMISSN
SEPT S A C%
25
33
3448
11/2 73/94
021000
AMERI-DATA SYSTEM
ADDITIONS TO NETWORK
2
2
OFF-* I CEK
6
56
E'QUIPMENT OFF I CE-
ln752.00--
4.
bib
3450
11/23/94
541400
MINN. STATE TREASURER
STATE* DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE
490.50
490.50
- _-_-�
3452
11/23/94
330700
HEALTH PROMOTION SERVICES
AEROBICS & HPS FITNE'SS STAFF
6
--
�,.55V.m0 '
-' -- ' fi
it 31
3453
11/28/94
761800
ROSEj PATTY
PROGRAM FEES
140.00
3.40.00 �.
46
-- 754 .29
4
.5455
11/28/94
8201.15
SIGN %1.*)*OL-(JTIONI.).o INC.
MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES
1e8.ra
-
,3456
11/28/94
551501
MN POLLUTION CONTRAOL AC-
PROJECT 93-02 PERMIT FEE
ow0.0u
�
240.00 w
----
-----------
- -' 410 ~83"-
N�
pwYzwo woswra pEKsa
340.00
�� �� F�
340.00
[i
- - ----' - - ----
- woswTe 'FEES*
^~'
��wV ww
'
'
'|
PAY
340.00
.`
r��a _
�wo.«m
--
---------- ------mAYmm
--- - -
2540^00
°�
pA yzwo m»
340.00
i
I
i
i
t-
, ialli.rl••iRE.2
CITY OF MAPL..�..WCICI�
PA6E 5
1. /{?,/
1: M 1.
. Y L J� � r �I� ..
... ." R EGIS T E R
i "i CHECK IBC" .y DTI• i
."
OR PERIOD I I
K
Itl�.�l X:ihl•�
m4
_.�
DATA:.
14UM sER
NAME:
DESCRIP
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
T e
FEES PAYIN(" AGENTS
-- NY :I: N � i:;r::I�TS_ FEES
�
_ _
FEES
l
lf�
P AGENT . F EES
340 w 00
1R�
i
PAYING AGENTS FEES
",
1�.
0- ENTO Y " "�•�
1a lI N `� {X
2�I
F *AY 1: h!G AG ENTS FEES
340 ..00
PAY :C Ni' AGENTS FEES
340.
r
Z5458
11/28/94
66 1750
NOR THI:: RN STATES PO WER
UT 1:1... I T r ES 70
4
�� . 39
2`
11(1
UTILITIES IES 1695
r!.
2 2
2;I
<i
T ET T U - f - 6 9 r
C
i
�i
t�TIL..I.TIE S :I. 99.5
__
}} w 72
30
!.d
l.1T1:1_.IT1:E:S 210
7
3'
M-
5 « :ti
V
ta i" I L A T I I+ S . 2575,
:iii ..1.2
34
j
UT :r. L-I T .r E .� 741
35
�► ..
UTIL- I: T IE:;) 1401
1 69 N 1.9
3, ,,
l.lT' I", x T x r:� 1.882
•. r4�'
.�
UT`I1_ITIES 2146
.1.4.56
r
*1E 234
11 N 9 6
4 :
_UT:I:L..IT
U T i... T S 2740
113 .72
..r ,037.94 .....,..... _.. _.. __...._ .... ...,__..._. . �__ _.._�._.._. _
...._ ......,.. 41'
o
:lf,
3459
11. /28/94
8 5
T. •"• SHIRTS
UN & C LOTHING NG
57 « 00
5
7
3460
1.1/28/94
310100
GOLDEN STAR PROPERTIES
PMT L'iAMSEY CO I-OW I NT LOAN
32
,:ice ., {)i37 w }7
<1n
50
i
I:t
- 7) 46 1
.UZ
3462
MINN. :�TATt�. 7`r•��� AiaU�1:::F,
i �ar•� I ti!w I�� i." : L C FEES F'AYA�I."E:
r � r"a
�9.� w �q
:�9� ..::�{)
.
_ -- - - - -
-
- - -- -- - .. _
5f
,,.
3
11/28
7205
POSTAGE BY F•'1" ONfi"
RC "PL "Ehl:lX1••1 PCISTAGI:. METER
31
„4}OO w p O
1461 ._
I
.. 34-6
.�. } }� _
Fi.a :�
".. ti _ ": _. _ .� �.__ _ _
w �- Il...i:. Clhll" 1•� l�l�f.r • � f 1: i-a�•tNA T� 1. Cll�t � Tr-+<<1�11.•:.L.. �c �T1-+;(a .l: {+f .l. i+iG W
;�{1 M� N {�{�
__.. _...._ ..__.. _ ... _ ... 505.00 � __
__ 61
147
62
346 5
1 1/29/94
541400
M T NN w STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VE•I••I L..1. C: FE S L•'AYABL..E.
1 0 v 071 . 00
1 0. % {} ? N 00
6;2
6r,
i {
3466
1.1/29/94
541.400
1 NN N STATE TREASURER
STATE DRI I." 1: C FEES E'AYA11.1L ::
393.00
:a93 N.00
F
Yj
,.r �aJ"
:L :I. /'�'.
� :i: 1
{ �: ► r„ � t:l�•.i :.. A w -
. REF l.lh 1
•Y
N
%:) 468
11/29/94
950200
WOi:llf?S1: ND , I ... :L NDA
Ftl. ::I- LJIAD C. VEIRF M*r Al IB 4090 3
37 . 22
.;v...
. ".(.•
i
}�'?�.. 9
r•t t•
L .I. /',�:.5�/
2
.�:.C3 {a{ {�
" ' ... . C
L• !~.Ahl ii...:i: ICI CZI.�I: °yT
, .. . C' .... '• 'C
" >lJF•'F•'L:. : L E:.:� C.11• 1. CrC»
2
21.25
j ' .
7'
h�I::.F• i�1?:I.i�it - i. »Ci..�-�,C�_ . 1" f 7 ** 82
`�
REFUND GRADING) L : :f :3i.% -ROW REC: 7782
19.32
1,01
�
4
�
o
�
o
CHONC "-----VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
I TE--M
CHECK
19
�
o
�
V
12
,000.00
31--�ADING ESCROW REC 7773
�
o
1f)
3
- 1/42.9/94
843323
STEWART BROWN
REF7UND GRADING ESCROW REC 7870
1
�
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 7870
4.25
I
«
R I C 78
V 000.00
�
v
15.00
1.5.00
�
23
`
24
1
11/29/94
180450
DAILEY HOMES
REF:*UND GRADING EESICROW REC 7710
14000.00
�
.
27
3476
3.1/29/94
400980
JEI=FERSON HOMES
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 7709
1,400().00
26
WFUND
�
`
30
3477
11/29/94
131800
CLASSIC HOME DESIGN INC.
�
32
,
33
3478
11/29/94
050825
AVALON HOMES INC"
REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 8000
1-100on-00
�
`
3479
11/30/94
260125
F.M.FRATTALONE INC.
36
UN
1 38
'
39
3480
It/30/94
120325
CELLULAR ONE
CELLULAR PHONES
101.89
101.89
—
--
mp �__
______
-50 — —
---18�954.50
—
� 144
r
.)484
11/30/94
722200
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
NOV F*-/R DED DEC PREMIUM
333.V V
�
MINN. STATE* TREASUF`ZEm
MOTOR VEH Lzo �� PAYABLE
u,797.75
u,797.75
.
TOTAL CHECKS
412
�
��
i
%1
(i
�{
VOUCHRE2
CITY
OF' MAPL..EWOOD
PAGE:: :I.
1
12/02/94
1 3:1 8
V OUCHER/C HEC K REG I STER
4
0 C.r...._f.. _ - _.._ ..
VOUCHER/
7.
C HIf:~t:K _
CHECK---
I: `�`� M --___.._.___.__ .___..____.______._�._._____.__ _____- -__ -.. _ __
-_._ .. _..._.___ _T _..- r �� :aYl ..____ _ -_ __ -
.__._ - -_,__ ___ -. CHECK
- - - --
�
NJMBER
DATE:.
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
t
569:
1 1,L`/94
0 - 10 �7 5. ___.__, -_-
ACE__ - HARDWARE- �. �.
SIJF'F•L.. I E5� �= ECRU � E•M�M�' - --_-,�
_ e� » SO
_
,
__ 13
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
5.3
'a
SIJF'F'L.. :C E:;S -•• EQUIPMENT
385
MAI NTENANCE MATER IAL''
SUPPLIES -- JANITORIAL
176 r 27
SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL
359.82
1 x 449 » 09
'I
1 5693
1 /12/94
02030.0
ADVANCE TRANSPORTATION CO
FREIGHT FOR ONE SYSTEM SWANS
57
57
1 tic594
12/12/94
_ .. _ 0207 5�0 ~ _ .
ALL GOALS,, ' I NC ;, _- _......__ ........ _ _..... _ _. _ t -.
PROGRAM Sl.lt^'F•L l' ES
718.88
71 C3 w E3C3
1 569 5
12/12/94
021 000
AMER I -DATA SYSTEM
SYNOPT I CS HUD
1 3,4 7 N 77
j
.. I
NOVE;.L..L NETWARE & TRAIN NETWORK
716.00
2
�
'
,.,
I
.,' 'I. cy696
:12/12/94
021 200
AMERICAN FASTENER
REPAIR & MA I NT /ECRU I PME:NT
72 .88
72..
1
F i
12/12/94
02 1 4 80
AI"!l:::RICAN RED CR0 by
B(H)KS
164.88
:1. ., 88
S! j
•tom
_ J __♦ _`_
/ M WMI ..___.___•-- .__-
_ ♦ _
______- .___.. __- .__ -.. -_. - -_ 57 N 3�.�
,
Jl r�
1
0�« 0 AIIOCLY -H.. .,0 r
. � -•_�__
� Irs L
J
�.: Ea99
. �:'./ �. /��4
040 700
ARDI: N SHOREV 1 EW i•dO;�al�' I TAi...
TEETH C1. l ::Ah! I hits K9
. 42142.
,Sti
:1.5700
1`
04091
ARNALS AUTO SERVICE::
REPAIR & MA I NT /VE.'H I C:L..E:
41
R
r
N
157
12/12/94
0613 01
DARGE-1INI M F AULIhfE
PEF• -- Taus CANCELLED
40.00
40 . 00
i
1 5702
12/12/94 _. - .._.
- 061 500... _. - _
' bARRETT•p .... DAhIA _ _ _ _ __ __ .. _ ...._.
REFUND. .- . FAMILY MEMBERSHIP
250.00
250•.00
15703
12/12/94
070500
BELLAIRE SANITATION
RECYCLING SERVICE::
3673.
383.50
�..�
15704
1
071200
BEST BUY CO.
MISCELLANEOUS C:OMMOD I T I ES
2 66 . 1 5
MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIES
266
MI SCELLANEOUS COMMODIT .... - _ . -...
383.34 - -
91
'
,s.
�. ;� 7{�::1
1,:./ 1 / 94
: v"
0 90573
FrA I NTE.P t..OPF' »
O SP SIT 0142 ENV A SS
�i ., 07C3 w .a.a
6 "078 - 3Z5
u
1 5706
1 2/ 12/94
091 L 3 5
BROC K WHITE
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
248
248.25
41
l;
1UlEDC-RS . ,)AE'E:
_
'
MAINTENANCE MATERI
91 M 74
1
66
�67
- 1...'7 {�O.1:.�5114% 94 __
1� x
.CO � �` : » - C «r �'CJ' C :�S ��
1"�E`k:. ` CIr�SE.E`��I IC.'E~ __ ____
- - - u 40 w (7►O w__, -_�.._
._-_. -- _ - 40.00
53
70
54 15709
12/1.2/94
110470
r
C:AR1«.. .« .«
I« .. �� N
..! E AI OWI "Ih ����
VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
ICri.:.
w
w
%1
,n . w� 7:1
1 � �/ .1.4/94
1 10 520
('- ARL S ON TRACTOR � E QUIP, I P w CO .
SUPP - V �
VEH .I. C:LE�
.., ».
x,.94 « 79
294
i /4
,• �
.,�.. ...�.. 4
�. «0,a,�....
t..E..T:.i..C11...A1� CIN
�C:I: : ..1..1.11 :..f1t"-� - E' I��I ll�ll::. us x::
108 "'
TELEPHONE E «L-'t'•IONE.
48 N 0l
156 .79
j�
I
(r
Am-.712/94-
230675'.
EAST-7STUE CARQUEST_-
SUPT"UTES' _VE 14T CLE
32.00
» - _
1.5722
12/12/94
231570
111DOETT, IRJA
REFUND TOUR REFUNM
40,00
40.00
VOUCHRE
12/12/94
240600
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
21.49
PAGE '2
1.2/02/94
250055
ER C-1GONSTRU INC"
VOUCHER/CHECK. RE:Glc%)TER
REFUND BAS KEH7BAl ... L
30.00
:1.5725
12/12/94
250066
1 2
TRAVF:-*L- & TRAINING
2nOOO.00
2
1.5726
12/1.2/94
260450
FEED--RITE CONTROLE)
CHEMICALS
340.20
340.20
i ;'CHECK
I I Mill
NUMBE R
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DE
-SCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
A%
I NGS -'LTD'-------
V0 nrWA-Tr-R_ Sr--R-VTCE
i I Ron 09*'
-a- 8- o__ 8____
1571.3
12/12/94
1.40203
CLEAN-MATIC
CLEAN CA Rl::'ETS
74.55
7 4 '5 .9
H
7
•1. 15714
12/12/94
151350
COMF*-*UCARD INC N
SUFlPLIES -- EQUIPMENT
20 5. *73
SUPPL..IES EQUIPM -NT '
317.00
f
i '
SUPPLIIEEE EQUIPMENT
260.57
B 5 0 H 30
15 7 15
1,23'. -4
15A'2300_
COPY DUPl__TCA'TT.lW3'__T-#R*DD_.
COPIER LEASE FMT
n
1'.57.1.6
12/12/94
1.52400
COPY -.EQUIPMENT,, INC.
91UPPLIES OFFICE
263*.68
A*-"63.68
ij
1 0 ; l 15 717
12/ 12/94
170901
KS
D.C. SALES CO.. I NC.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
127.86
127.86
2/94
DENTAL CLATMS RUN OF 1 4:6*'"74
It
" 1. 57:19
1.2/12/94
190160
DELORNEo MICHELE
RE FUND CANCELLED CLASS
24.00
24.00
15720
12/12/94
230500
EAST COUNTY LINE FIRE DEPT.
FUE--L & OIL
462.19
462.19
j�
I
(r
'-15727'12712774
Am-.712/94-
230675'.
EAST-7STUE CARQUEST_-
SUPT"UTES' _VE 14T CLE
32.00
» - _
1.5722
12/12/94
231570
111DOETT, IRJA
REFUND TOUR REFUNM
40,00
40.00
15723
12/12/94
240600
EMERGENCY MEDICAL F:gROD(.)C*TSlINC' THERMOPLASTIC STRAPS
21.49
21.49
(SUPPI ... I ES _7 ECUTPKIENT
250055
ER C-1GONSTRU INC"
RE AIr MAINT TILITY
REFUND BAS KEH7BAl ... L
30.00
:1.5725
12/12/94
250066
ENERGY RESOURCE GROUP
TRAVF:-*L- & TRAINING
2nOOO.00
2
1.5726
12/1.2/94
260450
FEED--RITE CONTROLE)
CHEMICALS
340.20
340.20
'-15727'12712774
1 2/12/94
A760540- FERSU IARG)ARET
REF-'UHD_--_ PART I AL ... « � • • ••
L-00-4--
32.00
15728
/
1212/94
26 090 0 F I I-41 SC R, JOAN
REFUND - TOUR **ANCEL,I..r.D
40.00
40.00
:1.5729
12/12/94
301650 GE'NERAL OFFICE PRODUCT
MISCEL-LANEOUS COMMODITIES
548.49
548.49
(SUPPI ... I ES _7 ECUTPKIENT
1.2/1.2/94
-27 n %.
15.7-31
1 2/12/94
302580
GL ADSTONE FIRE: DP..:F*T.
FUEL & OIL
32.00
32.00
:1.5732
t2/12/94
320281
6RAI,,11)11A'*':) BAKERY., 1:1 %1t: \ . N
1::'ROG%lRAM SUPPLIES
2 46.75
246., l'\•
15733--
1'%*5734
1.2/1.2/94
320651
BUTHRIEls ROSALAE
REFUND BAS KEH7BAl ... L
30.00
30.00
I'573ti
:1. 2/12/94
330071
1••1A6E.N.
., ARLI NE
REFUND TOUR (*.%ANC%-EL..L..E*--*D
20.00
2 0.00
i1
i CO - 1421
'MAINTENANCE - MATERIAL--
1 50 . 07
44
j ' �
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
477.1.2
------- ---
VOUCHRE2
358. 1-59
9 rzi . !C3
46)
47 1.5749
CITY OF MAPI EWOOD
430890
PAGE
REFUND 111:11BERSHIP
250.00
2' 50.. 00
48
...
-R
3
3.12/02/94
13:18
VOUCHER/CH K EC REB ISTEL
-REFUND`--'- • MEMI R.ERSH1Ff--
250 « 00
250.00
4
12/12/94
460000
LE. L. SHIERYL
TRAVEL & TRAINING
30.18
61 WXX".11E.R/
'23.92
531
7
ENDOW
TRAVEL & TRAINING
ITE14
ITEM
CHECK'
8 NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AITIOUNT
91
10 1----1-157
7 9 4
3 )30072
GEY w
, DY
-T -C -D
R E M-. N D 0 U f *C -A N C E- L. Ll
1.2/:Le.-/94
460700
LENFER TRANSM I is
REPAIR 1v1AIN*T'/VE+11C-L1-:.
11�
B E 3 B
15753
3.2/1.2/94
470700
LILL.11-E ISUB•RBAN A%1E:-'W1%:)1::'A1::'ERS
I YR SUB.
I
{
15737
12/12/94
3301.01.
HALEY p MARLA
R1*-FUND BIRTHDAY PARTY
1.2.00
12.. 00
i
13 �
14 1.5 7-:58
12/12/94
330360
MARCO WATERWORKS
REPAIR MAINT/UTILITY
420.00
420.00
16 7-39-71271-42774
3-30-gov- FAWKINsp D r--.LLC-
REFUND-- Wn:ZTfiDAY--FART'y-
�::� « �'i�._- -
-.___ - - - -- - -- -- :�';:! .. ;:��
18 1.5740
12/12/94
341511
HEN SL. ER. CAROL
REFUND CLASS
36.00
36.00
15741
12/12/94
350927
HOLIDAY INN.
TRAVEL & TRAINING
54.54
54.54
41 370DU0
-RUN T E CIRIC
PROGRESS PMT (*j%OMM CTR OCT 94
2.,132.00
,,J
PROGAiRE11:31S PMT COMM CTR OCT 94
,132"00-
40
:16; 15743
12/12/94
390100
INDEiPENDENT SCHOO1
DIST, #622 1--'UBLISHING
34.45
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
34.20
--PRO`GRAM-`S UPP1--IES-
29
F:"ROGRAM SUPPLIES
90042
%
PUBL I SH 11,46
13. G O
--'-1 "'R06RAt1T
94" N 07
321
PUBLI SRI N
6.00
352.64
- I - 7ZF - 12
34� 4
-41 4 23) 9 1 -1199 F��51 I E 1 R 1-11L-. L- -
1 S. -G oil M
r, 0 1 E T R A - V E L T R -A I H If 4 G
TRAVEL & TRAINING
326.50
653.00
77.82
:1. 5 74 6
1 2/12/5 4
401700
JOLLY TYME FAVORS
M SPPLI ES
PROGR A U
1225
-
1225
.
1. 5l47 1.2/1.2/94 410420 KELLER ELECTRIC IN(*,',* N 1---.1. EC WORK. 282.79 282.79
5748'---'
i CO - 1421
'MAINTENANCE - MATERIAL--
1 50 . 07
44
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
477.1.2
45
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL,
358. 1-59
9 rzi . !C3
46)
47 1.5749
12/12/94
430890
K 0 S 1. MARY
REFUND 111:11BERSHIP
250.00
2' 50.. 00
48
-REFUND`--'- • MEMI R.ERSH1Ff--
250 « 00
250.00
�oi
511 15751
12/12/94
460000
LE. L. SHIERYL
TRAVEL & TRAINING
30.18
'23.92
531
TRAVEL & TRAINING
1 5.50
*T'F;,*AVI:*.*I.- & TRAININO
25.56
VEH 1-CLE' ALLOWANCE
31*.20
126.36
:1.5752
1.2/:Le.-/94
460700
LENFER TRANSM I is
REPAIR 1v1AIN*T'/VE+11C-L1-:.
€:3f: E
B E 3 B
15753
3.2/1.2/94
470700
LILL.11-E ISUB•RBAN A%1E:-'W1%:)1::'A1::'ERS
I YR SUB.
16.00
in W,
i
p LJ
1.5755 12/12/94 490950 M-C 111DUSTRIE'..) ., INC. PROGRAM SUPPI ... IES 112.75
e725.95
M.O.U.6 MEMBERSHIP
1.5756 12/12/94 190051.6 M. 0. U. 19 93 20,00 20,00
:1.5757 12/12/94 501225 MAC QUEEN E'QUIPMENT OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 14
810.50 1
Eno. 50
i jo l
t'.
r57r,5R_'_J71�:2. 794--_
5106 MAFT_EW(.10Y_FTR'E
REL I EF ASSN
F I rRE REL I EF A NNUAL
PMr
TRAVEL & TRAINING
1.0 s637_..()0
21.00
ill
1. t763 .7-v/ ONAL R* CREATID14 & PARR A S' JR 0 0 RR) �
w
.00
1. r5759 :12/1.2/94
i j
VOUCHRE2
r-*_'LECTR.ICAL IN'SP
CITY 01* PLE
MA 'WOOD
PAGE 4
630751
1.2/02/94
13--18
14.00
-R/CHF*-*CK REGISTER
VO UCHE-
5.,067.50
1. ',5 7 6 5
12/12/94
640805
NEL.SONS AUTO SERVICE
CR -1.2
F1_F::(.'o%*1*RI CAL. I NSP
NOV 94
5
4
_'5 ----12/12
15766
94 -64090.t--
#-540400 111 KES,
L _
__ S ERVICE CEN *per{..
VE - Vr
A jR 7
-1- T E. 1
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBI*:_'k NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT AMOUNT
it
iu
1 .1.5767
V57`61 12/12/94
540430 MILES4
20.00 20.00
REr FAM _y
1.5755 12/12/94 490950 M-C 111DUSTRIE'..) ., INC. PROGRAM SUPPI ... IES 112.75
e725.95
M.O.U.6 MEMBERSHIP
1.5756 12/12/94 190051.6 M. 0. U. 19 93 20,00 20,00
:1.5757 12/12/94 501225 MAC QUEEN E'QUIPMENT OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 14
810.50 1
Eno. 50
i jo l
t'.
r57r,5R_'_J71�:2. 794--_
5106 MAFT_EW(.10Y_FTR'E
REL I EF ASSN
F I rRE REL I EF A NNUAL
PMr
TRAVEL & TRAINING
1.0 s637_..()0
21.00
ill
1. t763 .7-v/ ONAL R* CREATID14 & PARR A S' JR 0 0 RR) �
w
.00
1. r5759 :12/1.2/94
531300 METRO
INSPECTION SERVICE
r-*_'LECTR.ICAL IN'SP
NOV .94
1
4nOL, 4.00
12/1.2/94,
630751
NATIONAL REC.. & PARK ASSOC.
]ROOKS
14.00
14.00
5.,067.50
1. ',5 7 6 5
12/12/94
640805
NEL.SONS AUTO SERVICE
REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE
F1_F::(.'o%*1*RI CAL. I NSP
NOV 94
5
4
_'5 ----12/12
15766
94 -64090.t--
#-540400 111 KES,
L _
__ S ERVICE CEN *per{..
MAINTENANCE TER I Al."
0
1 .1.5767
V57`61 12/12/94
540430 MILES4
CHRISTINE
REr FAM _y
MEMBFRSHIP
250.00
250.00
:�
1.5762
1.2/12/94
551700
MN R . PARK ASSOCIATION
TRAVEL & TRAINING
21.00
21.00
ill
1. t763 .7-v/ ONAL R* CREATID14 & PARR A S' JR 0 0 RR) �
w
.00
J.'5764
12/1.2/94,
630751
NATIONAL REC.. & PARK ASSOC.
]ROOKS
14.00
14.00
1. ',5 7 6 5
12/12/94
640805
NEL.SONS AUTO SERVICE
REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE
65.53
65.53
_'5 ----12/12
15766
94 -64090.t--
NIERAD --MARGARET
TOUR CANCELLED
0
1 .1.5767
12/12/94
660063
NO. AMERICAN SALT CO.
MAT NTENANCE MATERIAL
--KATATEN6
14
Wr KAT M. I AT-
At,
:1. 15768
12/12/94
660255
NORTH STAR CONCRETE COMPANY
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
I
I
A3
0 14.1
! 15769
12/12/94
660800
NORTH ST. PAUL CITY OF
UTILITIES
349.31
t1r,
UTILITIES
:1. v 320.38
1.,669.69
Af
• 17
1.57 70
12/1.2/94
661450
NORTHERN 1::*RAMES & GALI ... ERY
SUPPL.IES EQUIPMF-.-NT
44.45
44..45
UT11-ITIES
M68.17
.1421.02
8.
Tr
AW r
T
155772 E., L F� E
:1. 15773 1.2/ 12/94 690301.
PATRICIA L-E:I-.':- REFUND ~~ TOUR CANCEL.1.1---D 60.00 60.00
:1. '5 7 74 :1.2/12/94 700 5 r5 0 PM PUBLISHING DEC MAPLEWOOD IN MOTION 600-00
MAP1..EWOOD 114 MOTION 50 00 650..00
DEC
A04 % % 430 . 00 430 . 00
1',577',5 12/12/94 710200 F'E::(:*.*---F:*F%*AIFZIE--- EQUIPMENT CO. SMAL.L. TOOL.S
--- -- -- - -- __. -�. Y+ncm , E.>.ocr2nrsfi=•.•7N�!rew
tiAw
I
f
i
VOUCl RIHI M
C ITY OF iYIAF'i a :WCIC.ID
::
t" Af �E
P
1.: /94
13
t1 /C+i�•lE. ( : K
4
l c :� 1�� l�•' l ::I�t : ca D 12
5
.. W {•lLli:Hl.I•l/
t� t
..
CFIC�C K
�`�hiX}Cl��
�! � � �• _ _., - _ .., _ _ __ _ _ .�._,.._......._�._t
E..hl Cl +;
_ ..._ __... _ ....,,_...�
ITEM
_. -
ITEM
CNE:.CI{
NUMBER
9
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
101
10 :C :� �Tca -`'.•. a.2 4
711 500
F'I••tC.l OS T GO
FILM M I~'ROC E SpaI N
5. 54
FILM DEVELOPING
5.24
1.0.78
it,
12
.-, _,� .-�
. -.�,,, ;
.� _ _.
'I�UC;Kh►iC
_ J1
I:•
13 :L ,.t/!
.�.
1�:.t,Jtal
�._
ft:,►E..�'C�h1 r MC:w
lYl .0 .a C� E»L:L.AhI E�CaU..y CrCI 1MOD I �' I k...a
1 t >a M ,a4
�. at} N .a4
14
!'
15 1557
1 2 / 1 x/94
72
F'R I E:.BE g WI LLI AM M M
AhlNU - N IC D UE S
20
20
1u
17 15779
12
l21 2 00
PRO SOURCE F ITNESS
MISCEL SCE:.L OUS CCIMMOD I T :I: EIS
1 q 06 5 N 00
18
MISCELLANEOUS CClMMOD I T I LS
26
1. a aft .. 3 7
19
zu 15780
12/12/94
72130
PROGESSIONAL. REDEVE- L•CIPME: NT
REVIEW APPRAISALS OPE : :N SPA
1 q 3 5 0 N 00
1
i�'I°•�1.= • 1 :sUA `144- -.F4_T {:::XA] t
bid N Oa
c�c� N t)q
r.2 : - M - 7f3r --- T. -Ti2/94
7 1301
R AE Y C ' +
24 :1.5713 I:.
1 2/12 /9 4
74:1 6 00
RAMISAKY COUNTY
F E'�O E CT 9.1:.-03
276
Y�
PROCESSING" NG` OC T_ 94_
1 4 N 1. 4
,n
D ATA PROCESS G OCT 94
1 4 5. 02
/7
D PROCESSING 0 C 94
29.2
484
3
28
1 5 783
12/1
742 540
RAUE R- KRAME:R p E::E.. I ZABETH
RE -FUND FAMILY MEMBERSHIP
350.00
350 . 00
%wo
30
st 1• .57E14
.1 1 94"�
- . RE_A__QE R q AMY'- `KRA(. � ,_ ____ ._ _
_� RF.. t: ND z . .;sE4...F . _D FI =NSE- :- _.._...- _ _ ____ _
1.4 , 00
1..4 N Ofd
f
_ " - 74 2
32
3 .I..•
12/12/94
743 500
RECREATION S UPPLY .C ON
GUARD CHAI
1
1 4 909 N (}0
35 1.5786
12/12/94
75 0750
R E,ai: NG q I...E:.CIhIA
RE-FUND TOUR CANCELLED
20.00
20.00
36
_
- _
.
1r;
1
31 :1. 57' 437.E _
, .(�/r,2 1 .79 - 4 -
.,� ,���
_
� l.lhl�} -•• �`C�1.JE'ti C;AI���I...l. »EY�
,
,�.. N
� 00
,c..0 N
38
�. s
.39 3.578
1 2/ 12 /94
7 5 1400
K I EF•E R SPORTS GROUP
M I S CELLANEOUS C O M M OD I T I w S
1 q 411 « ata
1 q 4.1.1 N 06
41 1 , 5789
:12/12/94
761200
ROAD RESCUE
SUPPLIES •••• EQUIPMENT
105 N 05
# ;
12
.)l.)PF'l ... 11. •-•• L•CltJ l l "'Ml:: NT
1 02.. E) 5
r141
REPAIR I"Il ANT /EQU I•.I" NT.
1.5 N as
267..90
i
1 r�
- - :1_57( r�t)
tt.
l r:
-- -- - - >�al �>"�� ra : �:•:-_ � x :: - - - _ -__ _- _ _ _ _. -
-- . __ as N as -
_ _ 1 500.00 - -- -- -
- a
�� C� t r r arm c�c - �r ::
r t' r r
�u 15 791
1 / 1. x'/94
780 00
S&T OF FI C E I C.:l : F'RODUC<T: 1: I�IC� N
: �l.11�'F'l.. I EKS °� OF
54 . 16
_
{ tJF'F'I..:IES "•' EQLJ F'ME NT- _ -.'- - .
///rr��.
o
f:i� .N••`i °'1....1.1::.5 «_ 01 1� �. CaE:
taf:l . 02
M I SC:E :3-A..ANE OUS COMMODIT
2 0 6 . 18
C:1PPI...:C1::•f�_ •�' C)Fl= Tt~E:
48..:1. Gi
{:)%LJ1 :: : :'1.:. E E::; .... OFF ICE
3 .3 9
�a
11 :I: t i C:1:l.�l. :.Al�ti.�t�l.lf.f I :f:li�tl'�f:lX} :E T l E :. i
i2 N 0
_ lytI S C IE E..I. ANE::t"1l.l i - C;C'11YI>YICIX}:E ' I ES _
352 .86
ICI :I:a.iawi...i..:AlaE::Cltaf t:Cll�l1�((:1D �:' :I:1:::;:•i�
457.44
Ii
t at.11••'I ° :...E 1.. 01:: *E• •l. t %E:•
:
SUI PI j rs - CaI 1w I C•1'-
39.68
1.1 336..-7
k/
!.' - - - ---'------------------'�------- ---
uoUc*;E.2
/. '1o/Vz/p4 13x18
[ -----------------------------------'---�-----'
Lil
pwos a
/voucHsn/
'|om�on' --
ADDITIONS TO 14ETWORK
------------��-�-���
zrsn
wunasn
mArs
wumasm NAME
DESCRIPTION
wmOuwT AnoVwT`�
^ ` _____-_-__-
'—� �--------��--- —
,
`! ln794
1.2/1.2/94
810700 SHoEI ... Y CO.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
2
1.5799
12/1.2/94
15795 12/12/94
1.5796 12/12/94
W :1.5797 1.2x12/94
820600 awwp-Ow TOOLS
831450 apsc mArsPzwLS.
'
SMALL *TOOLS 35.55
OTHER CONSTIRUCTIO14 C08TS 2"971.1.4
OTHER CONSTRUCTION COSTS 517.91
831.506 Sl--*I:*-:CTRUM BUSINESS SYSTEEMS m�pAzRe & mTwos /souzpnsNr 60.00
om.am
----------
ADDITIONS TO 14ETWORK
528w2O
668.97
1.5799
12/1.2/94
831800
ST.CROIX RECREATION CO.
INC. LAND IMPROVEMENT
150.00
150.00
ENGINEERING 92--20
51.4,56
i
3.5801
12/12/94
843400
STO--COTE PRODUCTS., INC.
MAINTI_--NANCE MATF:_'RIAL
91.0.00
910.00
N�
:1. 15802
12/1'21/94
850-1580
SUNDAYS C 0 0 WE S
MDSEK. FOR RESALE
97
93.80
FUEL & OIL
87:87
253.43
SUPPLIES ~ OFFICE
42.81
��.�a
- -�
----------------'-------------
���--------------'
-- -- -
--------
a
214.07
auppLzsa - mrrzcs
4 2.e1
,'!
' -
-- _-------------------------------------------------�
�upp�zce -oFFzcc
54.44
|'
e�pp...zsS OFFICE
44.73
-'
- -----'----�
---------'-�opp�z
----------' --14 .9-1 --- - ---
-' 'm67.1 1_------
MAINTENANCE *ArsezAL ' . 445. 39 '
mAzwrswA*cs mArsazAL 64*.e2
^
`' -1,1:7 ('% l Y 3�, m�_ z� �r�� ��z� r'��'�
- _.= ^.__ ^- .`- "-- x- -1� ^�.w.,.� ,..... _..,...- _..,.. .,,..,...._...._..,..� -,� .� ..... . . L` ,. n.,....,.....,. .._ ......_... ...._..__,..- ._..._-- ......,... m . .«- . > .. -.. ..�r..... .....,.- .,..,... I�� yr„t *m:_..,r ....r.- tn_nh.,- �....•v... , ah...... n
-._ -_ � :.._.� _ s.�,____I - _._.- .__�_..i,�. _. __.� - :__u _:....- ._�llt rr ___��'._..�..� . -. - . , . w. ...,.,n... .,�. : �,�.�„*pj,?.• - , r„.,. .. , - r..•- »ifmre+y�.n..•.�n..«m�my. e •= r m^ 'F• r^. A.t n^*.. �m•.^ '*'Yt ^^'oH eseFn.. ra.-n +n
�1
F
' C�(at :I••!F'�I %:;�•'.
CITY OF MAPL..EWOOD
WAGE 1
�'
3 12--/02/94
13:18
VOUCHF
-R/CHECK REGISTER
t
5
6 V0(.1(11 R
6, �
TTE -
8 NUMBER
DATE
NUI� 13ER
NAME'
DESCRIPTION
ITE
Ai�IJ(.lhlT
CHECK
AMO C K
i
9
it
lU
X99 4 :i:
1,
MAINTENANCE MATER I AL"
MA I htTEENANC E MATERIAL
»
463 .45
"'
13
14
1 ; '�
80.01
919 » 16
N
14' 1 5806
1
860650
TARGET STtJF'iI•,:�i••••CPC,; r A/R
��.
PROGRAM .�'•a(JPPL.. 1::.S.
� 27.06
17
1e
PROGRAM
3
16
20
lei :I. w�l3t? l
fI
12/1 8ca. � l
..-,--- .,..- ._......- ...,- ....,...., -.
_ THOMAS DEL L "NE REFUND. _.._ SWIMMING M I ^ NG CL..ASS
- „- ._...,,.... --... _..- ,.rte. -._. ..Ti♦
�._ _
33.
• - '
M M
.:f � as
o 1 ;:�C3D8
12/12/94
1` a
THCltr1 8 SIGN COMPANY
SIGNS 8 I GNAL
497.75
4
26
- � r �7�-- �•+t •�+ �► -��c-
.'1 ...� .b rt:.�.l. ri:./ 7 "t �! w� I :� 1.i 1 N .1. 1`fi.� »
-�� cam - �- - - /� �l�y 1 � �-�- -�!
i�G:. 1 �li"! !'1 1 Y .I. I.iL..L:.
1 3
24 158 1 a
1 2/12/94
880675
_
t:�C t�'I
�' �l ••1 �. �8 UNLIMITED ICI 1 TL:.D
PROGRAM
..
25 CC
1
27 �. 8 �..
1 / f
8tiO 300
TRUCK (JT:CLITI S MFO
REP & MAINT/ Q (J II ""IYE NT
25 '-5, 4
5
25 4
it
'28
29 1 58 12
3u
1 2/12/94
881
TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT AND
TOW
w iq » OG
50
s�
3a
3[
3')
33 .L 5B.14
1,2
882900
TWIN CITY VENDING INC«
�
MDSE, P C]ir•+: BAI »E�
31 » 9 5
4.
4:; 0
34
- F'ti
r-%F:.c.; 6-LE
s..s...1 N �} wt!
d 4: ' )
35
36
IYID,�1-" » t"'(• R RESALE
25
508 . 93
46 �
37 - , ..
1.�../ �:4 -_�'
w1_
y p`iBTAL 8;1 I ("w.
t,7
. ._.._T _ _ _ -_
._._ _. .__. _ . __..... _.a .. as _ ........ -. --
47
46
4 ,.
39 3.
12/12/94
900100
UN U NLIMITE D
UN I F :'OR S & CLOTHING
1 4 - 9 . 71
aa
41
a 1 °'lei •J �`
C.11� . (� •� CL..(�Tt•� �hTC�
(.11�I:I:l''(JFtlrt; Pe CL
-- �__. _ .. ___._- _- -- __.._ -._ . •-:.• .. ..
. .� � » �a:a
8 p 55
5;,
54
12 __ - _ -_
_ _ _- __ _ . _
- rT
__� - �_� _ _
t.li l .L L' (JC•�J'rl:•a & CLOTHING
4.45
(.11�I 1.1•� i:1��lY1.� �:��CL.:CIT!~I�Ih!(a
�- ..,�,.,., �
_..... _.
14
U14 FORMS & Q1 ... OTIA I NG
154
iG
•na
_
>;
t.1f+I :1: F= (aFtilTl:a & CLOTHING
36
1
lJN:LF'(7RMS. & CI...CITH:t:NG
116.9,5
;1
UNIFORMS CLOTHING
90 .8 5
1 1
15 8 17
F.27 1 22 7 74
i:.
96".
3
4
SUPPLI OI•• F• I C E.-*
.a «cats
':� ':ti
�. 26 » 82 �
5�
..y
A(.,i ;II::.I•� .� .:1r.l.L..L.
_
REFUND SELF DL:.F'L:aNSE
1 »00
14N00
:i
' 1- .5 819
t
_L._.._ ...... ...... . ... _._.. _..__._
12/1,'••••/94 94a as
__-
WI: :.:>;C.Fti"•••4'F�CI a 'TI~t INC,
F••L„
,.. F•' I F:'c EQUIPMENT
�a(J
196
1 96 N 91
1.a82 0
1
940700
W! -BC.CI D 1 { }TR I D(J I ON ., I „
{ } (JI �'r'I... �. �:.�:� .•� 1 : "(:((.l T I• -' l:. * N'r
�
1129 `t? N
i :. . .. .
1
a
a,
_ �1tI�IICLLh �_�_��
" - :f_ ;_'j__L ..... .........�,..,.,- .,.,...«. ..,...1..... _;.T•� J.. _.�^ r.:_ , -y.. -, - .-�. • •.m�?nxr -e mx•r- .- ..-
, .i..z ,., ..,ow..,.- ..., -.
1
r
VOUCHRE2
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE S + 4
e
t1tJUC'.1.4 E 1:ti/
F
f
; N(.1I' B1 --R
DATE
NUMBE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
I
i
t > 15821
1.2/12/9
941.205
W1'l .1'�� » �. t L 1.«l.J�
SUPPLIES I ES � EQUIPMENT .1.1"
29.82
2 9 « 81G 1
,.� :1.58
:� �'r` a. /94
960800
YOCH ;, TRAVIS
REFUND - YOUTH VOLLEYBALL
28.00
28 ..00
�.
- _ r. 8
:�: _ ��
.. � �:�� «
_ THE.
•
!
i
.c
�_ - fig .� 2
4
i<
TOTAL CHECKS'
j
I
t
1 I
!i
n � !
:{AI
1
{,
A7
(
I
I
ikk
i
I
CITY OF MAPLEW-OOD 0001
EMP�OYEE GR�SS EARNING8 AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CH��KS
22i 0044307 12/02/94 GR r EN MAGLICH
2,186.90
HN 125 16.0
THE F OR
RRE T PAY PERIOD
2 01
22i 0044307 12/02/94 GR r EN MAGLICH
2,186.90
HN 125 16.0
/~
~~
0044321
12102/94
MARGARET GIBB8
I90.52
15
V T
750.81
'44
4
i ANDER-15-4N
F-4
~~��
0044324
12/02/94
JUDY De8ILZAN
45 6.46
/~
!
CITY
�
OF MAPLEWOOD
' 0002
EMPLOYE� GROSS E�RNINGS
AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
..
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERI OD
� !
`
o
__
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE
AMOUNT
~- � |
00 4 43925
1 � / 0 2 / 9 4
L U C I L LE E A U R E L IU S
9 5 .14
/a
'-
_
10'45 9
_
_
' 1
-_ . . - - -
- _
—
��
. Ci
_
211
1 I V 5
_-
—
_
-_. .--.
-_ _
_ A UKF- ItE --" E '-"'U--ON
_
_
~
—
—
—
—
- - ' 4 - 4
121" 0 2
RT
_
~~
MilkPLEWOOD J,
EMP GROSS
THE CURRENI PAY Pt
FOR f
~
~~
o
M 0044352 12/02/94 BETTY MOSS uwG
\
's| —''— --
2 A
El T
0
T5
122:
105.23
ii
law 132�
0 0 4 4 `3*1 1—*-'.
O'c]: 9 4
.4 D Y 1W 1 D H OL M
10
5
1 2/02 i94
MARGAREJ DUCHARME
00
65.
-1 0151
0 4 4 3 7 '8%
0 9 4
0
LU 1 110MPS N
V-
_
�
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
' 0004
!
EMPLOYE
E GROSS EARNIN8S
AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
!'
CHECK UMB
NER
CHECK DA7 D
PAYEE
AMOUNT
'!
0044379
12/02/94
ELSIE WIEGERT
109.54
/a
r~
a !
0044381
12/O2/94
MILDRED DEHEN
97.60
°w.
�
!�
|`q
0044382
12/02/94
THELMA LING
100.65
|�|
.`,..`~E, E— D- . .__
.�/
is 0
=
—RI OGILVIE
~~
0044387
A
`~~
0044391
0 Z2
r ~
r ~
97 0
"fir
94 55
�4i
pw
0044399
12/02/94
VAHEY TAT EOSI�N
103,70
��
..—D IVERSEN
-low
0444C 3
"N DICKSON
9 13
!33
:3 A
,+
1 35
137
1
T 1
1 4
41
"iw
2
4 5)
146
!41
1 49
irn
Iii
52
153
; 54
1 57
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0 5
14-1 0 42i 9 4
KA THLEEN S U P.P4. N
- iylP - OYEE GROSS 'ARNINGS
L
AND PAYROLL DEr U-6TION CHECKS
12/02/94
ISRAEL PE"IFER MOREENO
105 .23
00444*4*4
1
FOR
T H P ER 1 0 D
CURRENI t I
T P A Y
100 . P�-
1 CI
j-R-G H
!p lff4
0044421.-1
j.
1 2 /02ZI 4
P A 2 R 1" C I A T H I P 3 0 N
10 IS
0 4 4 4 7
CHECK NUMEnt
CHErK DA i A t: t
A i 10, U 114 T
I a a
2
K ENUE-TH -V cni i i WR
j
0044406
1 4
BARB."A'RA (3' A L L Ilk' G; H& t
i ZZ" c". -511 0
0
0 2 f 9 4
JOANNE M S.1 V E N N
:f 0 '7 �r
.6
al
------- Jc A E L
i 7 1.:' E
1 E-4
1 Z 0 9 4
0044408
1 *7
JOYCE U
0 15:
Z 3
00444(--,9
12' 0 2 9 4
"A fi CO I- TR E L
."o
13i.
4 4 4 1-0
12 i 0 2 P9-4
--ELS 1 E ANDER ON
6
i 44!
0044411
12/02/94
jENNt i it E-.'UNDg-
.93,03
0044412
s:;, , �' 4
12 0'
OSEPH RYAN
- 9
4 -4 4 1
l2iQ2/94
WILLIAM SCHWELLMAN
.20!
: 1 ,
0044414
1 2--* 0'&':-'ii 9 4
MARCELLA WATSON
10-3,
70
'2
;021
0044415
12/012--f 9 4
JOAN CARR
2
1
1241
i
0 • 4-4-1--,t:,—
Q 4
afR-A-C, E L u E
9 4
5 115
2
,271
0044417
0 2 9 4
DELORES SCHIPP
0
15.
0 0 4 241 4 1 8
1 0. • *-10 f
'LORRAINE FIESCHER
15 -s-3
T 5
29
ARD WQLSZQW
96.423
i3l!
34" -
el
0 0 4 4 42- 0
1Z/OZ "14
iYD"A Situ IL
i 0- 0 �
.
!33
:3 A
,+
1 35
137
1
T 1
1 4
41
"iw
2
4 5)
146
!41
1 49
irn
Iii
52
153
; 54
1 57
9
14-1 0 42i 9 4
KA THLEEN S U P.P4. N
1 04 t c
0 0 4 4 4 3
12/02/94
ISRAEL PE"IFER MOREENO
105 .23
00444*4*4
1
1 0 9 4
GLADYS A S S
100 . P�-
1 CI
j-R-G H
!p lff4
0044421.-1
j.
1 2 /02ZI 4
P A 2 R 1" C I A T H I P 3 0 N
10 IS
0 4 4 4 7
1;22f 0 2 9 4
MARY KA T PALANK
1
I a a
K ENUE-TH -V cni i i WR
004 44JIL29
1 0',.--'/ 9 4
CAROL E L RI(,-.Hi-E
i ZZ" c". -511 0
0044430
0 2 f 9 4
JOANNE M S.1 V E N N
:f 0 '7 �r
.6
al
i 7 1.:' E
0 0 4 44 2
1 Z 0 9 4
ARCH F MA%R"1
L, I L
F
1 1 518. 3 - 7
9
6_3
|
'
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
V00�
_.--- _.... -
-- -_ -_ Ij
_ -_
�~
_.._-.__
-J ~^�~` ',~ ' 1 1 -~`
---'' -'''--
'' '--
- NT
.'
.~.
.'~~
11. 0 4
... ..-... - -......._-
~~ |
.0044435
12
VERNON
~~
r �
'
r ~
IWO-
'-
| CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0007
E
E� GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION
EMPLOy CHECKS
FOR TH E CURRENT P A Y PERIOD
0 0 4 4 4 9 12/02/94 ROBERT E VOHNERK
0044471 12/02/94 J MEEHAN
1,865.34
044.53
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DA'. D
PAYEE
AMOU11T
85.64
-
- !
a
|r|
'
`�
L1
- !o{
|a'
0044462
12/02/94
JOHN FRA8ER
-
|
0044463
12/02/94
DAVID J THOMALLA
2,079.72
' |`o
i
ia
�
TA DOWDLE
l '10
I
C7
55
°
^�' `^' ' '
'`~L ' ~~'` -----'''-
- "-' ' -'
�J 0 0
'HER
7
0 0 4 4 4 9 12/02/94 ROBERT E VOHNERK
0044471 12/02/94 J MEEHAN
1,865.34
044.53
''- -
^ '
'
-p� 0044477
an 4
0044478
SCOTT K BOVE
85.64
-
_
`�
L1
1)0**480
1Z/02/94
DAVID L ARNOLD
e_
ia
-
''- -
^ '
'
-p� 0044477
an 4
��
0044478
SCOTT K BOVE
85.64
�
`�
L1
1)0**480
1Z/02/94
DAVID L ARNOLD
e_
ia
'HER
7
|
o o � 4 4 8 �
z � / o � / � �
� JUDY u , n � n �� � � � n
�
'
� v � o �
^
��
ev
Is
*q 0044510
m�
12/02/94 BRUCE ANDERSON
2,178.66
i521 0044511
12/02/94 CRAIG MISKELL
240.00
`
'
|
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
' 0008
/
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNINGS
AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECK8
..__.~'
1 2 ..
.^��^.'' ''.^~�.`
^
1
/
004449Z
12 '4
JAMES DARS71
; 30i
TTHYS
[�[
0044504
1Z /02/94
WILLIAM PRIEBE
1
ev
Is
*q 0044510
m�
12/02/94 BRUCE ANDERSON
2,178.66
i521 0044511
12/02/94 CRAIG MISKELL
240.00
P1 0
-11HE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
FOR
t]
'
GC
Js
!94
NICHOLAS N CARVER
004 4 517
1
WP h-i
B 21 71 cl
-
0044 S
*78
-
'HA-1 `VAQUE
-/
0
_
GA
-
-
_
-
0 0 4 4
33�
1
4
-
_
/ ^
"°-_~~^
.
--'-- _ _ 1
t]
THE US
!94
NICHOLAS N CARVER
WP h-i
B 21 71 cl
0044 S
*78
00
0
t]
t - „
l
i
13
ii sir O M {
410
'
"OSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEEDUCTTf'IN
'S
KEVIN HALW E G i R
In
ii
�
1 34
00 44 55 6
1 ice. 1021 i 'J `•'1'
e
i 3 i. a 49
i
f
`
�1 -t 5 2
J. L - s ! .: i.. 1� T K !�i � � { 1
- t.�..� i t'ir wT�
I �
!
0 0 44 5 4 3
1 2/02 /9 4 TI BROWN N
1 =;0 1100
i9i
_
,
-C• • «� 4 .5
&4 J ' 4 w' w it { i 1 L C J :»� if...L' L.» L .
. + C;i � ; w
J
,
•
7� � .L �i" R.d
3 t... A
ii
T
; • t w i
0044
• 'L.. i Lr l 9 { '• .J } EN W " S T i '• �w i i�r L
'•� _ 0 `: � • 1
ap
1Y
1 4(
!l8}
J ti 1
s r im y jjy;� s ' r ��� _
0� 2 ii ! � i 'i � •."• t '. i •. '.�•w.i = t 7r'
•''
te'
� 1w. - G O
j
` f
.
Tti 1
� �231
12
1•r»- ■l er ( {� lLL�. es { } t�.•» � .2 'si j.
i t ROBIN I f T i • r A i i i i_ . 1
4 , M. 2 •� � �
2'
1
0 0 4 4 5 6- 2
.» « t 1 �
! • 0 2 _
i
- Y7 y, { . y } _. -_�_
..ii
� _ L :.• i:. i 4-9 •+ �' l.t L.. F : :.t FSF
i ` •L
i
«• �• � .,
00
{ r i� R 2 � � i • ; • f '+ T
12. t�2 . 4 RI N
i•� �i '� s
. 3�»• ._..1
.)7i
!
«• �.r w `w }-s . + ':yt'�_'" - --
i frr� i�r. 9 _"F
128
• 121
0044553
12 EDWARD
J i
CZ
t - „
S t
i
13
410
'
.0044555
_
12 j0 2
KEVIN HALW E G i R
In
1 34
00 44 55 6
1 ice. 1021 i 'J `•'1'
i'it } aE R W ._..= RE i . L M
i 3 i. a 49
ff
_ "
k ` »� Af� � -- �
�' T'i t� � -
1 474 x- - s 1
37
_
f
Q,y
0044558
~ s �• f 2 �t 4
Z � .d L.. J'
+..t i s
D i. f E R ' i ' I i
7� � .L �i" R.d
3 t... A
ii
0044559
J.
ap
1Y
1 4(
�O 4:: 5 cri --
-� l - _: - ��- 3 - # t� 4-
-- ___ -_.� a� d HL i.. N � G H E R± T om +
I
•
` f
.
Tti 1
j �_.M».�.
(1 ) 0 4 4 •� Z i 1
12
1•r»- ■l er ( {� lLL�. es { } t�.•» � .2 'si j.
i t ROBIN I f T i • r A i i i i_ . 1
4 , M. 2 •� � �
2'
0 0 4 4 5 6- 2
.» « t 1 �
! • 0 2 _
��tt +� i y,, � �•• i ce'
'•. 1'S i j l - SON
:.� f s i ° t •..: �.. 1
' 9 2�2 ''
t 2 . t � •
•.. ..� s r.
' y i
u�
..
!
«• �.r w `w }-s . + ':yt'�_'" - --
i frr� i�r. 9 _"F
-- G:F 11 itA
J i
CZ
00
i... »# s :.
U L I E' C ! � R i . I- P . A i �i
7 Z ss .2 5
�
0 0 4 ? 5 6. 5
•..., t'- ':• _ : •{
1 i.. 3 s � :�. � .� "!
T 7" f .. ti 2 � is s e•+. rt i !, j
� � � t�s : � � �' �► i..� ; � � �
.' 3 :
L fps a '�' s L ..
•i Lr i
.
'
�i
15ri
0044567
12 /02 9'4
LISA KELLY
237 .825
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0011
/ EMpLOYEE
GROSS EARNIN8S AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR ' ``�
CU PAY ' ' E`` ^~~
0044573
_
H
DUN
! z
18 4
487.58
� i
'+' 0044�68
|o
12/02/94
JEAN GLASS
.
-
|o
� r
' ` � ' ' '
� — — i- — -- — X.
- - -
!
- |a| 0044570
/
12/02/94
SANDRA HALWEG
' 1 18 .63
e
",�=` "��"�"
^`~,~,
'»| 0044571
12/02/94
PH IL IP COLEMAN
249 ~85
_
jJi
_
0044573
12 0'
H
~~
18 4
~
vo��o/�
��,v�/,�
",�=` "��"�"
^`~,~,
ERNEL !US
-~ 23 1
0 00
~~
vv��u / r
^ � , ,�, , �
" �',', , "� ^ .`.E
~ ~_ , ` ~
_
�� ' 0044594
12/0�/94
DOU8LAS GERICK
702 .00
�
^~
jJi
~~
0 00
55 2
��
~�
�� ' 0044594
12/0�/94
DOU8LAS GERICK
702 .00
4mb
°w
=w
=~
Amb
°=
~`
Adw
4w
°`
Aw
~~
=~
0044598 12/02/94 CHAD ABR�HAMSON 418.5A
-BRA MARTIN 6 3
148 1
p� 0044603 12/02/94 iESSICA JOHNSON �T1 &n
122 2 !
+
vu
29;
a
r
|a|
0044597
12/02/94
DENNIELLE HANDT
270 ^ " �0
|s|
4mb
°w
=w
=~
Amb
°=
~`
Adw
4w
°`
Aw
~~
=~
0044598 12/02/94 CHAD ABR�HAMSON 418.5A
-BRA MARTIN 6 3
148 1
p� 0044603 12/02/94 iESSICA JOHNSON �T1 &n
122 2 !
238,50
29;
135 41
135 41
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0013
i
�.. t i � i E E 1.s R �—I S S EARNINGS
AND PAYROLL D E D V L• i •L �.r� �ti
CHECKS
�i
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY R 11"D
`
�s
04 4 .. 2 t.
t:.. / t:.. J
:: : f s..
- .. t... s ..
i
7 !
f i !» f l.. _ �'•
4 tw
s:.. •.; L J t = ,1 -
tuf •• i f.w i t 1 D D L ! L S K
tir. S i„t' C •„�
i Q
i
1 1 (
{ j r
0 0 4 4 ./ J:,. 5
1 + 1 0 it i 9 4
M I { s"• HII E Li.. ice. T R O� s T
10
,
12 ;
L
• n
.J 1
- ---
- -- - - - 4 - •�- �:: -.'t
NANCY _ B R
w
— : I
Lr � r
1
1 `
;..� "# a i � ' { c „�
r F
•~ �r i ` •�• =:
; •• t` H " L_ C AS E Y
6 ;� M .3
4�
i
_ _ _
61 .75
!
0
i "i i`i : r.._ '-" i
-1 0 2 r c'•= ; f i 4 e LI
i t 2 01
i
00 44p-.F ' .�i ��,d.
.Y. L.. r v L.. J� _.'; 1
L j � i •j I L. f - - ! �� {w S "!
2�i. • j = 5 0
1
,
i "i i J =_f ;_
Z _ ' 02/94
�� I R G i N 3 -r .� O L � .�t � Y
65.0 v
'?3i
if
0 a.•i' .�_ +.I
J:.. " . Y ) •'
! i ti.i fs�i
f : .
L0
L U
i v. 1
i �� }��
.M} 4 :.( t i «I ,- A
" �['
•. �, �;,
ti.. i ..E s:.. 9 4
... .' � _ : �' �s
. f �..Z D a. t.... C H R �. i7 � � is s ... i �
} f "r �• �i 0
3 .. ti« :t
! ..
•.
1
J�1
j
+t
_ ...
+��
s �
•,� I. *4 -f r - 8 - ._
�-��-{_`�
T� �
frr i kr. J
L• i w t
G H E
t 8 �' Z #
17 w
!37i`
-ow
p
!
0 0441*:- I�r{j
'r •�
...� t ` � � '.• ,y�
Ar f • wJ Jr.. E T i
S'"' � } J (l+•�. �' i � �" �t''r['
s t +.r O.. LIt. it i�r = ti
w f .` f,� . I_i
1 •_t I .� I Y /ri
i•nd
,{{1:
i `} 1 1
12 `:
_
i ---
t
t t ,• i '. i
..
-.... iiw .� w }_ �.'��i= . - -_
_ T - r - j { y( - -s j ( -
:i •' t N L T G it i - 7 4
j�
.r y
/ J
.••;.
# . ;. i : ;. J •-
t t r. s i t 3
L D
9:32 1 83
1 ^
f. � 0 � �' _ .t 4 •r=
� 2 • "s 2 c'
STEVE ?'ti t ..» = ... t
� c w `•
rrii r
_- 3 ..F 4 4
J
—4 t... 7' s.. `i i .4
tt � ��
�F i ,,i.. t.� �� �� � �s
��u
4
-0
!
� c" 5
f�� i f ?J�
4
p I •% }` # � �y
D E
4 -•_ =Jt - # .
.
0� t 4 4 {.} 4 �. I
. Z/ #a Z i .� 4
G E O R G E >� � S P R E, f G i..
� s� •.mss 19 s i�;t f�
.. ,
- :,. =t --
-- c:.- - 4 iS
� -- , Rai A G E R
JV'
i
0044648
-.:1 17 -51
ELIIABETH %J WEI.LAND
1 4
004
1 2 i 0 2 9 4 --gE4M Q 5"IR R'll 1 n— Q Y ASS Q
W141 4 6`4 554 1 T b %..0
EDIECA CHOICE 46
004466 0 9 4 N,
VOID
4 'IENT `6
0 0 4 4 7 VOID P U E; L I E M P R E 1' 1 R E17 L ASSOC
2
--T lREIMENT AS�zjmc
A 1D R i F; L 1 G, EE SM P ci 2 i 9
vu
4
Z '0 9 4 LvEi S, 7'"
0044�-*.'.6? Z'
0 0 4 4 7 v- 1 f 0'%-/- 9 4 s-:lEvL:9su 175,00
I 1 2 i 0:2 i 9 A W A S; w W G T WD N G "D w N T y 2] (_ i)
IAM
0044672 VOID 1 '21" / 0 2 /* 9 4 tFIRST MINNE-SOTA (FICA) J.9.3
52i
0044673 VOID 12/02/94
—T 4 4
VOID
a ll 9 4
0044i5'75 VOID 12-102
7 ~� ^ . 0 4.i . 94 . . _ ^ _ .._ .- LIF _ 88
~.
_
�
_
—
ipT
_�
_
—
—
—
0044 1.2/0 ci
0044626"0 VOID 12 0 Z
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
`
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
6,822.10
9,032.97
t. . �~.��
` ~~ —.— 11
~,~ ~~`,
u I
3 S '—' ~ . '` . .`~~� —�~ _
�~. .~`' _—'~
CHECK
`'_.~~``
~..�~— ~—. _~
. — . __
.`.~_..
~
.Iwo, | s |
` ` ' ' ~ ' ~
. _ __
~ _ . _ _ . . . .
. _ . _ . . . _ .____ _ . _ . . . _ _ .
_ ~ , _ ~ ~
a /
—|
�
.. 4 4 ~~2—
,~^~
~ f _~. ~ 4
..- _....E COMM OF —_._.—_
- ~ ,~~.~_ `
_
�
_
�
_
—
ipT
_�
004
1 2 i 0 2 9 4 --gE4M Q 5"IR R'll 1 n— Q Y ASS Q
W141 4 6`4 554 1 T b %..0
EDIECA CHOICE 46
004466 0 9 4 N,
VOID
4 'IENT `6
0 0 4 4 7 VOID P U E; L I E M P R E 1' 1 R E17 L ASSOC
2
--T lREIMENT AS�zjmc
A 1D R i F; L 1 G, EE SM P ci 2 i 9
vu
4
Z '0 9 4 LvEi S, 7'"
0044�-*.'.6? Z'
0 0 4 4 7 v- 1 f 0'%-/- 9 4 s-:lEvL:9su 175,00
I 1 2 i 0:2 i 9 A W A S; w W G T WD N G "D w N T y 2] (_ i)
IAM
0044672 VOID 1 '21" / 0 2 /* 9 4 tFIRST MINNE-SOTA (FICA) J.9.3
52i
0044673 VOID 12/02/94
—T 4 4
VOID
a ll 9 4
0044i5'75 VOID 12-102
7 ~� ^ . 0 4.i . 94 . . _ ^ _ .._ .- LIF _ 88
~.
_
�
_
—
ipT
_�
_
—
—
—
0044 1.2/0 ci
0044626"0 VOID 12 0 Z
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
`
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
6,822.10
9,032.97
0044672 VOID 1 '21" / 0 2 /* 9 4 tFIRST MINNE-SOTA (FICA) J.9.3
52i
0044673 VOID 12/02/94
—T 4 4
VOID
a ll 9 4
0044i5'75 VOID 12-102
7 ~� ^ . 0 4.i . 94 . . _ ^ _ .._ .- LIF _ 88
~.
_
�
_
—
ipT
_�
_
—
—
—
0044 1.2/0 ci
0044626"0 VOID 12 0 Z
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
`
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
6,822.10
9,032.97
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
`
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
6,822.10
9,032.97
W1 0 D 0015
CITY OF NIAPLE Ll
lil
THE CURRENT PAY t=
CIAECK
NUMBER,
2
14
61
I i
I
sire f
110!
I
4W
i
i
1
(
14.1
i
fi
1171
a► 1
lip I
�
1
1
+
i
1
1
f
241 t
j !
I 1261 .
i2�
1
1
t
1
oo
'29
31,,.
i :321
f
33`
1 3 4!
I�
�
36
137
1
�41,
1
I
;
1441
?
I
4
47
1 48
r
,
1
1
151
1
-
152
i
j5J
�
I
34
-
1
�J7
j�
F- zz
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review
PROJECT:
St. Paul Hmong Alliance Church
LOCATION:
1770 McMenemy Street
DATE:
December 4, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Aotion by Council
l
Endorsed—__ __,
Modifie d- N .- m -,
ReJ eote
Data
The conditional use permit (CUP) at 1768 McMenemy Street is due for review. (See the maps on
pages 3-4 and the site plan on page 5.) The CUP allows a church. The St. Paul Hmong Alliance
Church is using the pernut.
BACKGROUND
On November 24, 1986, the City Council granted the CUP subject to the three following
conditions:
1. Adherence to the site plan, dated August 26, 1986, unless a change is approved by the City's
Community Design Review Board.
2. City Engineer approval of a final grading and drainage plan.
3. Provide adequate screening of the parking areas from contiguous residential properties in
either the form of berming or planting that would be year -round screening.
On December 28, 1987, the Council reviewed the CUP and required a review again in one year.
On May 24, 1988, the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) approved the design plans.
On December 22., 1988, the Council reviewed the CUP and required a review again in one year.
On December 11, 1989, the Council reviewed the CUP and required a review again in five years.
On April 26, 1994, the CDRB approved a 32- square -foot ground sign for the church.
RECOMMENDATION
Do not review this CUP again unless there is a problem.
p: sec 171hmong.gwo
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. ' Site Plan
2
Attachment 1
•
60
35 10
1
• 58 now
36
LARK
MI Kra pA KB
g L r rL E CANADA a VWIN
L AURIE RD v►
Cc t) n o m h ® c0 RD 8
• 4 ,, N N A UR K E nV
Cr
N W
• a z EL�Rt OE AV -��� £LDRIDQE AV a
a a Oehll//r9 "' �► l
�- Sondy Loke o �' y Cr
L N B E L MO N T LA E . G E AV ►- , L.Oke M N T 4 a. �
0 / cu Be f �I
SK t L L MAN AV N SKILLMAN A!
II MAN AY x
W K ENW 00
Pl
¢ 3 LA
MT VERN AV i v > ♦- W
• . a a a MT: V RNON
u A a MT VER NON AV AV
•.� o s V g 2 W W 26
Vf O W Q J O
n26 �..� AO.SELAWN AV 26 a
t3' BE LwOOO av v BEL WOOD AV „ : BELLWOOD AV BELL 000 nor
0 60
in SUMMER AV O 0 a /
c � FE NTON aV W 'J^ m M 3 J
L A pt b _ RIPLEY
z
p p� ptE pE z vt �'p = AV ArtolA�L W
t•J �{
fl. An _ W W W R t P E Y AV R E C� -... -�
$.- 2
S Y
K IN(i�" ION 11% 4 = V m 2 H ROW
„ A / K INGSTON AV A [�
N PRICE AV
a m 3 $ 4 o Q
; . �^ LA E TE AV �+ Q Q j 1A -
55 7 / 56 <04
t 0 SA /N T
st
LOCATION MAP
4
N
It
7 7 q) !.
( o � I
V I . 5o3ac.
.saa 02 s�
a /8� i. 5 0 ec. L�
02 r. 44
rw
♦r dS�.001 5
5.83" _ 29 4 •�
a0 •
tt
438 - cp
!A
of l.L4 ate. t .Z54 K.
V O �.w
- 1.Z4ise,.
R:3
d
/7) o?
V
..._
Z T .24 � �
,48! os
116 7%J.43 1 ?. SO 7S . 7.9 7S 73 7S ?d � �
IF (41) MAR 6 M R FORT la o a
10 - �! (�3� S 4 3 Z m �.
. 11 OUT LOT A _ L 1 f t�4�
243. 73 75 - .75. 75.1.9
C,34� RIPCtY `
RIPLEY AVE �IDI�EY AYE 13 AV �s
378, 416 426
-
iJ
� ,� � 446 456
1774c) C3�� 390 �' 398 . 406 436
38Z ., �� 402 S a s0 o �1 ,
N
r
ro
3
0
r
S T. P HNC N ..
:-& ... . ......
�./� A L
t ....
... ......
............
-X
2 0 ! 68 ( 3 ,m
................ ....... . . .. ........
......... ......
..... I.- ......... I....... - - --------- LL NCE �H RCH: ... ..........
19 ..........
7 �1 • C A
18
Q —
1 (51 �.
J
t o t 0 — —
lklj
cA
• ;• 26
0 a ,7 m _
78. ( 4'7 O ac • ' 3#1 25
T 24 '
0 1766
060 r 3.64 sc . - - _• • .0 t
4% ( 44)
• ,
IA
�J
10 floc I%S0303 6� ZO
o
31 4 48- 4 3 1 01.8 6' _.._.
-- _ ( V .4 Ica. �h 9 / t ' a
03 4 0
iO c o IT
7g .13.46 P. 157 ,., —
�.:_°J m T o
(7) 1 16 �
. c
�GSb.'TS am) K
say 6 3 ' of A
C .�5 T�o1 \ q` ' �� 114,172- 2.4 � _ �— 1 6 cr
D7'
I it �
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
a
4
N
Attachment 3
i W
r Z
IIT
4
N
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Clerk
RE: 1995 ON -SALE, OFF -SALE AND CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS
DATE: December 7, 1994
APPROVAL OF 1995 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
F-3
Aotion by Counoi3 Q
Endorsed..
Nodif i GA
Re j eoteA
Date
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA,
that the following On -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this
Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1995, with
approval granted herein . subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and
health Inspections:
Frank Romano James Dean Adeline Benjamin
Applebee's Deans, Inc. Maplewood Bowl
2112 Maplewood Mall 1986 Rice Street 1955 English Street
3001 White Bear Avenue
Eugene A. Beaulieu Gregory Paul Kuhns Ronald Ringling
Beau's Food & Spirits D. G. Burgers Corp Maplewood Inn
2289 E. Minnehaha 2441 Highway 61 1730 E. County Road D
Stephen Yantes Raymond R. Emerfol 1 Gregory Tul gren
Bleechers Garrity's M. T. Pockets & Co., Inc.
2220 White Bear Avenue 1696 White Bear Avenue 780 East County Road B
Tom McDonough
Chalet Lounge
Gulden's
The Olive Garden
1820 Rice Street
2999 N. Highway 61
1749 Beam Avenue
Richard M. Authier
Harry S. Given, Jr.
Gerry L. Walton
Champps
Keller Clubhouse
Red Lobster Restaurant #283
1734 Adolphus
2166 Maplewood Drive
2925 White Bear Avenue
Martin E. Mongoven
Roger T. Claussen
Mark Weinand
Chili's Restaurants
Keller Lake Lounge
Red Rooster Liquor Lounge
Southlawn & Beam
2280 Maplewood Drive
2029 Woodlynn
Janel Kettler
Thomas K. Buckley
Ciatti's Italian Restaurant
The Bird
1900 E. County Road D
2025 White Bear Avenue
Club On -Sale Liquor License:
North Maplewood Lions Club
1310 Frost Avenue
Loyal Order of Moose 963
1946 English Street
Wine On -Sale Liquor License:
Taste of India
1745 Cope Avenue
APPROVAL OF 1995 OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA,
that the following Off -Sale Liquor Licenses, having been previously duly issued by this
Council, are hereby approved for renewal for one year, effective January 1, 1995, with
approvals granted herein subject to satisfactory results of required Police, Fire and
health inspections:
Steven S. Eberhardt
Ebbie's Wine and Spirits
2290 Maplewood Drive
Arthur Mark Stein
Laber's Liquors
1730 Rice Street
Gary Hanscom
M.G.M. Liquors
2950 White Bear Avenue
Marven C. Koppen
Party Time Liquor
1835 E. Larpenteur Ave.
Wendy Lauber
Maplewood Wine Cellar
1281 Frost Avenue
Gust R. Sarrack
Sarrack's International Wine & Spirits
2305 Stillwater Road
AGENDA NO. 600f(
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director Z
RE: RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR 1995
DATE: December 5 1994
PROPOSAL
E ndorsed..,.
M odified- - - -
Date
It is proposed that a resolution be approved to adopt the budget for 1995. According to State law,
this must be done at the conclusion of the public hearing.
BACKGROUND
On September 12th a special City Council meeting was held to review and discuss the 1995
Proposed Budget (see minutes attached) . At the conclusion of the meeting, preliminary approval
g P �y pp
was given to the proposed budget. On November 29th a public hearing was held on the 1995
Proposed Budget.
BUDGET ADOPTION
The attached resolution should be approved to adopt the 1995 Budget. (The attached resolution
includes amounts based upon the original proposed budget.)
p:lagn\AdoptBud.95
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR 1995
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MA,PLEWOOD.,
NMNNESOTA that a budget for 1995 is hereby adopted as outlined in the following summary:
CAPITAL DEBT
OPERATING IMPROVEMENTS SERVICE
Estimated Balances 01 /01 /95
$8,775,606
$ 5, 038, 089 $10..810,375
Revenues
20, 461, 560
3, 454,110 2,363..680
Net other increases (decreases)
280,280
1, 731, 540 1, 219
Expenditures
20,835,765
7,369,670 6,304,000
Estimated Balances 12/31/95
$ 8, 681,681
$ 2, 854, 069 $8,089,105
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
1995 Operating Budget:
GENERAL FUND:
$ 419,080
City Clerk
689,270
Community Development
488, 860
Finance
1,608,350
General Government
983,910
Parks and Recreation
5,188,230
Public Safety
1, 796,090
Public Works
$11,,173
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
CHARITABLE GAMBLING:
DENTAL SELF - INSURANCE FUND:
RECYCLING FUND:
RECREATION PROGRAM FUND:
COMMUNITY CENTER FUND:
SEWER FUND:
WATER FUND:
V.E.M. FUND:
DATA PROCESSING FUND:
PAYROLL BENEFITS FUND:
3,850 General Government
53,080
General Government
190,670
Community Development
413,765
Parks and Recreation
1,137,940 Parks and Recreation
2,983 0 Public Works
1 1 670,210 Public Works
417,800 Public Works
302,320 General Government
4489,330 General Government
$20,835,765 TOTAL OPERATING BUDGET
APPROPRIATIONS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the expenses for the Community Center Operations Fund
may exceed the appropriation provided that the net income for 1995 is at least $61,660.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for the
1995 Capital Improvements Budget:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FUND $ 1,180,360
OPEN SPACE LAND ACQUISITION FUND 3,000,000
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 464,610
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2,662,300
STREET CONSTRUCTION STATE AID FUND 1,370
TAX INCREMENT FUND 60,990
WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE — NO. ST. PAUL 40
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS $7,369,670
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director shall establish a budget for each
public improvement project when the Council orders the project and that the budget amounts shall be
recorded at amounts specified in the feasibility study for the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following appropriations are hereby approved for
the 1995 Debt Service Budget:
$3,945,000
Principal
21330,300
Interest
6
Paying Agent Fees
6
Interest — Interfund Loans
15,270
Investment Management Fee
$6,304,000
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for Governmental Funds are hereby
adopted for financial reporting and management control.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the above budgets for all other funds are hereby adopted
for management purposes only.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the transfer of appropriations among the various accounts
within a department budget or within a non- departmental expense category, within a fund, shall only
require the approval of the City Manager.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all appropriations which are not encumbered or expended
at the end of the fiscal year shall lapse and shall become part of the unencumbered fund balance which
may be appropriated for the next fiscal year except appropriations for capital improvement projects
which shall not lapse until the project is completed or canceled by the City Council.
pAagn\AdoptBud.95
CITY COUNCtUMANAGER WORKSHOP
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF. MAPLEWOOD
4:30 p.m., Thursday, September 12,1994
Maplewood Room, City Hall
MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Council/Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City
Hall... The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:39 p.m.
' Be ROLL CALL
Mayor Gary Bastian
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Councilmember Dale Carlson
Councilmember Mary Koppen
Councilmember George Rossbach
Others Present:
City Manager Michael McGuire
Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich
Director of Finance Daniel Faust
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as presented. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Carlson and was approved.
Ayes: Al
D. BUDGET .OVERVIEW
City Manager McGuire stated that the proposed 1995 Budget differed from previous budgets,
because it emphasizes performance and department goals rather than line item costs. He
highlighted the major objectives of each department. Some additional goals were suggested for
departments including:
City Clerk- Administration and Deputy Registrar: 1) complete automation; 2) the development of
customer service, user-friendly instructional aids; and 3) quicker service.
Community Development ment - Administration: Amend objective 1 to read "Provide timely information for
the preparation of the capital improvement plan."
AGENDA NO. for
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: RESOLUTION LEVYING PROPERTY TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995
DATE: December 5, 1994
After the public hearing is held, a resolution needs to be approved that will levy property
taxes for 1994 payable in 1995. Due to a change in state law, the amounts listed in the
resolution have been reduced by $1,593,415 which is the homestead and agricultural aid
(HACA) that the City will receive in 1995. It is recommended that the attached resolution
be adopted which will levy the same amount as the proposed levy approved b the Council
P y pp y
on September 12, 1994.
lz
PAagn\PropTx.95
Attachment
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD,
MINNESOTA that.
1. The following amounts of taxes be levied for 1994, payable in 1995, upon the net tax capacity in
said City of Maplewood, for the following purposes:
Operations $5,474,535
Capital Improvements 14,480
Debt Service 1,058,170
TOTAL LEVY $6,,547,,185
2. In addition, there is a $432,300 market value based referendum levy for 1994 payable in 1995 to
finance the debt service on the 1995 Open Space Bonds.
3. There is on hand in the following sinking funds excess amounts as indicated after each fund and
such shall be used to pay on the appropriate obligations of the City:
DESCRIPTION
1967 General Obligation Sanitary Sewer Bonds
$12,000
1977 Public Works Building Bonds
4,800
1977 General Obligation Improvement Bonds: Series 1
100
1988 General Obligation Improvement Bonds
128,440
1989 General Obligation Improvement Bonds
80
1990 General Obligation Improvement Bonds
197,170
1991 General Obligation Improvement Bonds: Series 1991 A
65,339
1991 General Obligation Capital Notes
5,518
1993 Equipment Certificates: Series 1993A
14,538
1993 General Obligation Refunding Bonds Series 19930
20,525
1994 Open Space Bonds
10,002
TOTAL
$458,512
In accordance with Minnesota Statues 475.61 and 273.13 , S ubd . 19 (3), (a), (b), (c), and Chapter
297a and Chapter 162 of Minnesota Statues, the County Auditor of Ramsey County is hereby
authorized and directed to reduce by the amounts above mentioned the tax that would otherwise be
included in the rolls for the Year 1994 and collectible in 1995.
4. It has been determined that the following sinking funds have insufficient projected assets to meet
projected liabilities, as required by State Statute, and original resolution levying ad- valorem taxes
must be increased by the following amounts:
1977 Refunding Bonds
1989 Tax Increment Bonds
1993 Tax Increment Bonds Series 1993B
TOTAL
$33,300
9,100
252,797
$295,197
5. There is $257,530 of homestead and agricultural aid that will be used to reduce the scheduled tax
levies for all sinking funds.
6. Changes set forth in sections 3 -5 above result in a net reduction of $420,845 in the scheduled lev
of $1,911,315.
lZ
W: ap \PropTx.95
60W Z
MEMORANDUM
TO
City Manager
fROM-.
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review and Revision
PROJECT:
Northern Hydraulics
LOCATION:
1255 Cope Avenue
DATE:
November 17, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council:,,
-` Endorse
Rejected,,
Rat e
The conditional use permit (CUP) for 1255 Cope Avenue is due for review. (See the maps on
pages 4 and 5 and the site plan on page 6.) The CUP allows a commercial building within 350
feet of a residential district.
John Rose, of Northern Hydraulics, is requesting that the City Council revise their conditional
use permit (CUP). It requires their weekday hours be from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Northern
Hydraulics' current weekday hours are from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Mr. Rose is requesting that the City
Council change the CUP to allow Northern Hydraulics' current hours. (See their letter on page
7.)
BACKGROUND
Past Actions
On September 24, 1990, the City Council approved this CUP.
On June 24, 1991, the Council revised the CUP to change the store hours for Saturdays and
Sundays and required the owner to replace the weeds and dead grass with sod. The Council
changed the hours from 9 a.m. -4 p.m. to 8 a.m. --5 p.m. on Saturdays and from 9 a.m. -1 p.m. to
10 a.m. --4 p.m. on Sundays.
On September 23, 1991, September 28, 1992, and September 27, 1993, the City Council
reviewed the CUP and required a review one year later.
Code Requirement
Section 36- 442(a) requires nine standards to approve a CUP. (See the findings in the resolution
on page 8.)
DISCUSSION
CUP Revision — Change In Hours
The proposed change in the weekday hours should not cause any problem. This change would
g
benefit the neighbors since the store opens one hour later than is presently allowed. we have
deleted the conditions that no longer apply.
Outdoor Storage
Northern- Hydraulics has occasionally been storing trailer bodies and equipment in their parking
lot.- The CUP does not allow outside storage. Mr. Rose told me that they recently began renting
space from Metcalf Mayflower to store these trailers. The City Council should review this CUP
in one year to see if the outside storage has stopped. -
RECOMMENDATION
A. Review the CUP for 1255 Cope Avenue in one year.
B. Adopt the resolution on page 8. This resolution revises the conditional use permit for 1255
. Cope Avenue. The revisions are as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out
the deletions.)
1. All construction must comply with the site plan, received by the City on September 24,
1990. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City
Council m. approve major changes.
- - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- -
-
-3-2. There shall be no outside storage of goods, materials or trash.
_
- - - - - - - • • • • ALM w • 9 wif -- - - - - - - - - - - s - -
• •
---P- - - - IFEW-FIFS
WEN
6.3. The canopy shall not be illuminated.
4-44. The hours of operation shall be from 8-7 a.m. to 11-7 p.m. Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 5
p.m. Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Sundays.
2
1 There shall be no overnight parking of trucks.
-- - - - _
• wr .v .� . ow -- - - -
IL i i . AA - - -
i .
- - - -- - - - v - - s� s - - &g o MIR - - - - - -
p: sec9\northern3 . cup
Attachments:
I. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Letter from John Rose Dated September 27, 1994
5. Resolution
3
ATTACHMENT 1 -
3 &EL LCREST &R
4 DEAv DR
a MERIDIAN DR
2400 No
LOCATION MAP
w i
t
RD�
( SUM
P�
o
Wo LD
�o LQK
4
A ! t Ate"mtN 1 C
fir • • ' fb r
�.
24
23 .
r
too 3 1
• • •
�140 ac�
GAD
A
( 6) •• s Q�
0. � �,�• . Mt
•« dw..•' •
Acce
or 1
.
• •�rrrr•�� • }' I (I mom N 1 0
A $ v:
7 1 18
NORTHERN H Y DRAVII I7
•':'::'3� orb:•• •::. :• :. :•.• .. ....... ,., r
E st* of " la w$ ... • • a ..........iVI .. at
.�� /av ..............,..... :.
.....................
L � •:.
•0"
f �
n �
E •
too
...................
................
..............
it! ` f* a ..... , ..... .
....... sw
C� .1 7
t� o
s
ao
■ S COPE CT.*
- 1 4 126212 0112 8v12�6
•• • • •.
LARK AVE,
0
/
t �
/ N
�o 75
• 0 31
s� 1
1 g
1 " •
�(oil N
too
Z
W
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
5
N
ATTACHMENT 3
IiIGHWAY 36 .
:•.,!• .••♦.!'•I:: ��,1 t• • • 1. • • S• :,, •• .•• �•• • • •• •• • ••• . � + i • • ! • :• �, I.
••. ' ice. ti ,
• � •L' ♦ • �'• •• • •. • •� �•.
:� :•�• • • R • •_•• t • • • • • •• ••.••
•tw.�j Sim. . d A • ••
qw
r •• ,••
•� NORTM.•z <<
IL
• « v
.... ate• - • • • -..� . - •3Z SPACES
-39 TOTAL SPACM t
V.
S o
F* -
4
N
ATTACHMENT 4
4 N
orthern °
H y draulics 2800 Southcross Drive • P.O. Box 1219.• Burnsville, MN 55337 - 0219.612- 894 -9510
,NC
Domestic Telex 629 17439 ELS# •Foreign Telex 5106 009009 Fax 612- 894 -1020
September 27, 1994
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Ekstrand:
Enclosed please find a completed application, associated fees, and required information to process
our Condition Use Change.
At -this time we are requesting a change in our Condition Use Permit to shift our current operating
hours from the approved hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM - Monday thru Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00
PM - on Saturday's, and 10:00 AM to 4 :00 PM - on Sunday's.
As :shown by the above request, we are only shifting hours Monday thru Friday by one (1) hour to
better serve our customers.
Please address all correspondence for this matter to our Corporate Office to expedite any requests
or reply's.
If you need any additional information, please contact me at 612/895 -6802.
Sincerely,
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS, INC.
I o hn K. Rose
actor of Facilities
cc: Dave LaPorte/Northern Hydraulics, Inc.
Jeff McGU Northern Hydraulics, Inc.
Mike Stuber/Maplewood Retail Store
Attachment
7
ATTACHMENT 5
RESOLUTION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION
WHEREAS, Northern Hydraulics, Inc., applied for a revision to their conditional use permit. The
conditional use permit allows a commercial building within 350 feet of a residential district.
WHEREAS, Northern Hydraulics, Inc., requested a change in the permitted weekday hours of
operation from 7:00 a.m. -7:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. -8:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1255 Cope Avenue. The legal description is:
Clifton Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Vac St Accruing & Fol; Com at NW Cor of Lot
16 Blk 13 th E on NL of SD Blk 379.61 ftto Beg thS29Deg 14MNW 117.56 ft to NE Line of
Rd as Opened in Doc 2021912 th NW on SD NE Line 368.09 ft to WL of Blk 18 th N on SD WL
68.06 . ft to SL of Hwy 36 th E on SL of Hwy 379.43 ft th S to Beg Being part of Lots 19 Thru 25
Blk 13 & Part of Blk 18.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit revision is as follows:
1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
this permit.
2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
conditional use permit revision, because:
l . The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to
any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare,, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water
or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
8
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
p p
d. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer s stems, schools and arks.
Y p
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction must comply with the site plan, received by the City on September 24,
1990. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The City
Council may approve major changes.
2. There shall be no outside storage of goods, materials or trash.
3. The canopy shall not be illuminated.
4. The hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday — Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Sundays.
5. There shall be no overnight parking of trucks.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on December 12, 1994.
9
Planning Commission 3-
Minutes of 11 -21 -94
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A, Conditional Use Permit Revision: 1255 Cope Avenue (Northern Hydraulics)
Secretary Olson presented the staff report. John Rose, representing Northern
Hydraulics, answered a question on the outdoor storage.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
1. Review of the CUP for 1255 Cope Avenue in one year.
2. Adoption of the resolution which revised the conditional use permit for 1255
Cope Avenue. The revisions are as follows:
a. All construction must comply with the site plan, received by the City on
September 24, 1990. The. Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes. The City Council may approve major changes.
b. There shall be no outside storage of goods, materials or trash.
c. The canopy shall not be -illuminated.
d. The hours of operation shall be from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday - Friday, 8
a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 4 p.m on Sundays.
e. There shall be no overnight parking of trucks.
Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
B. Stillwater Road (Gethsemane Lutheran Church)
Secretary Olson p ed the staff report. Jeremy Bork rossen Wright Architects
spoke for Gethsemane L.. Church. Commis ' er Thompson asked Mr. Bork to
define the parking area and the bus - is S.
Commissioner Rossbach mo the Planning o ission recommend:
A. Adoption a resolution which approves a conditions ermit to expand a
char and parking lot at 2410 Stillwater Road. Approval is bas on the
dings required by the Code and subject to the following conditions:
C0700 -3
MEMORANDUM
Action by Vouno3.-L
Endorse -
TO: City Manager A
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Rej eeted....... .
SUBJECT: Gethsemane Lutheran Church Addition date
LOCATION: 2410 Stillwater Road
DATE: November 10, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Requests
Gethsemane Lutheran Church is requesting the following:
1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to expand the church. The City Code requires a CUP for
churches. (See their letter on page 11.)
2. An 8 -foot, 3 -inch side yard setback variance for the proposed classroom addition. The City
Code requires a 50 -foot setback. The church is proposing 41 feet, 9 inches. (See their letter
on page 12.)
3. Approval of their building plans
(See the location and property line maps on pages 8 -9 and the site plan on page 10.)
Project Description
Gethsemane Lutheran Church is proposing to do the following:
1. Add 13,757 square feet of building
2. Change the parking lot and driveways as follows:
a. Narrow the driveway east of the building and remove 23 parking spaces to make room
for the building addition
b. Add 22 parking spaces south of the church near the west lot line
3. Add trees around the proposed addition
DISCUSSION
Parking Stall Width
The City Code requires that parking spaces be at least 9-1/2 feet wide. The proposed parking
spaces south of the church are 9 feet wide. The church should revise this plan to show the non-
handicap spaces to be 9 -1/2 -foot wide.
Trash Enclosure
The City Code requires that the church enclose their trash dumpster. The church should -add a
dumpster enclosure to their site plan if they wish to continue having an outside dumpster.
Drive Aisle Width
The site plan shows a 24- foot -wide, two -way driveway on the east side of the addition. This
driveway Y , however, only measures 14 feet wide. The applicant should revise the plan showing a
full 24 feet of width. There is enough room for this, but two proposed trees would have to be
moved.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 14-16. This resolution approves a conditional use permit to
expand a church and parking lot at 2410 Stillwater Road. Approval is based on the findings
required by the Code and subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of Council
approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
B. Adopt the resolution on pages 17 and 18. This resolution approves an 8 -foot, 3 -inch side
yard setback variance for a proposed classroom addition at Gethsemane Lutheran Church,
2410 Stillwater Road. Approval is based on the following:
1. Meeting the Code would cause the applicant undue hardship. The side lot line runs at a
diagonal to the existing building. This makes it hard for the church to add on and still
meet a 50 -foot setback.
2
2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance for the following reasons:
a. The proposed setback. variance is minimal. Only a small corner of the addition
would encroach into the setback area.
b. The addition would not affect the adjacent neighbor's privacy or create a
crowding problem.
c. The addition would be next to the neighbor's buck yard and not near his house.
d. Existin g trees on the neighbor's property screen his house from. the school.
e. The adjacent neighbor has signed a letter agreeing to the setback. (See his letter
on page 13.)
C. Approve the plans (stamped September 21, 1994) for Gethsemane Lutheran Church, subject
to the findings required by the Code. The church shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this
project.
2. Submit the following to the staff before the City issues a building permit:
a. A plan showing the location and design of a trash dumpster enclosure. The
enclosure shall be of a material and color compatible with the building.
b. A screening plan for any roof- mounted mechanical equipment.
c. A revised site plan showing a 24- foot -wide driveway on the east side of the
addition. This plan shall also move the two proposed trees.
30 Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Install a handicap - parking sign for each proposed handicap - parking space.
b. Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
(code requirement)
c. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure. (code requirement)
d. Install site security lighting, subject to the approval of the Director of Public
Safety. The light intensity shall not exceed one- foot - candle at any residential lot
line. The fight fixtures shall be aimed or shielded so the light source is not visible.
(code requirement)
3
4. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The City receives a -cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150 % of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any
unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development
may approve minor changes.
4
CITIZEN COMMENTS
I surveyed the nearby property owners. There were only two replies. Both were in favor. We
received the following comments:
1. Gethsemane Church has always been a good neighbor and the construction is in their
.parking lot area, (Haag, 2407 Stillwater Road)
2. Refer to the letter from Philip Leeman on page 13.
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: The church site is 6 acres. The total site is 18 acres.
Existing land use: Gethsemane Lutheran Church and School and athletic fields
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Stillwater Road and houses
South: Athletic Fields
West: Stillwater Avenue and the Silver Ridge Apartments
East: Bartelmy Lane. and houses
PAST ACTION
On September 22, 1992, the Community Design Review Board approved a 32- square -foot
ground sign for the Church.
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: C (church)
Zoning: F (farm residential)
5
Ordinance requi rements
Section 25 -70 of the City Code requires that the CDRB make the following findings to approve
plans:
1. That the design and location of the proposed development and its relationship to
neighboring, existin proposed developments and traffic is such that it will not impair the
g or p ro p
desirability occupation of investment or in the neighborhood; that it will not unreasonably
p
interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing or proposed developments;
and that it will not create traffic hazards or congestion.
2. That the design and location of the proposed development is in keeping with the character
of the surrounding neighborhood and is not detrimental to the harmonious, orderly and
g g
attractive development contemplated by this article and the City's comprehensive municipal
plan.
3 That the design and location of the proposed development would provide a desirable
environment for its occupants, as well as for its neighbors, and that it is aesthetically of
good composition, materials, textures and colors.
Section 36- 437(3) requires a CUP for churches.
Section 36- 448(b) states that "all uses existing at the time of adoption of this article shall be
considered as Navin a CUP which contains ns conditions which permit the land use and structures
as they existed on said date. Any enlargement, structural alteration, or intensification of use shall
require an amended CUP."
Section 36- 28(c)(6)(b) requires a side yard setback of 50 feet for the proposed addition.
Findings for CUP Approval
Section 36- 442(a) states that the City may approve a CUP based on the nine standards in the
resolution on page 15.
Findings for Variance Approval
State law requires that the City Council make the following findings to approve a variance from
the zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means. the property in
question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions .allowed by the official
controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created-
by the. landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use
for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
p:sec25 /gethsem.cup
Attachments
1. Location Map
.2. Property Lane /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Letter from Gethsemane Lutheran Church dated September 21, 1994
S. Letter from Gethsemane Lutheran Church dated October 13, 1994
6. Statement from Philip Leeman dated October 10, 1994
7. CUP Resolution
8. Variance Resolution
9. Plans date- stamped September 21, 1994 (separate attachment)
7
hiCtit 0 AChf (2) MYRTLE CT
.'
93 �� i
LOCATION MAP
r
� � � T . t _ o _ k _ ; � � /��
'' 0
CA AV
0".
8 Attachment 1
' w �-✓ - S �J 5. Lr' 8C -
0 • . �i 8 aC . Gi0 O
t, t�8 O 3 0 .69ac
•Z' d1 K Madd e� p
41P 5 1
'p •
I
O � V -t . 1P
4 N _ 3 l.32csc• 7 74 #W
Q `'•�
• iit.I
mm
Ap
N ! 96
C*j Af
do w
- -
E CASE AVENU � e 4 +� • - _..` - " o r o
93
�•67 Qt too
v (4-)
(:9 a N N C (65 3 %Wx I
Lij to
i Et
z,3 �..' N ."J
IA 2.2.7. 1 6) Cud C�B� _ ��` ,,••••,,• },• „
oto
s
C217)
� !h
r
a
. F*.t
i sit
r �•
ti3
Ja r •....:: ::
•••: ••
v .. , .....;; ;,... ..
'�
J
�� �,,. "T ��) r •
to
CD
•; ;,.;;•• . ,,,...,..
J I cod
l� 00
: : :;�• : ::
•••• ••
2410
.:
- - -
.- ::::•��:; GETHSEMANE LUTMERN CHURCH 6 ��
..•
,,..• ;; :...: ;;;::. ; ;;;:: '
.. ....• ..... .........•
(2 ?� o Ch �
5
�
N rA
t ,
r 8
IL W i (S) d�)
S ILVER RIDGE APARTMENTS * � i�t�
� - „�� � W BRAN D 7 AVI
Q ZAcMQ MEMbRrAL ��4 1 0
9 273 ' �.1 Q
v �! ELD JJ 1 4 ?} 4v
c z♦ )
O T � l a y , N
(�9) N ,
o . ETHSEMANE PARK
I to Flows , Se E*"%t. Doc.
,P O 5
>�s
(is.30ac)
in �
ap
r �
_...._
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
9 Attachment 2
Q
N
GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH
ir k
lw
{O
LIB
W
Q
J
J �
Ni
'll . Ali&
W
Z
g
J
W
� Q
y CO
PROPOSED 22 -CAR PARKING LOT
SITE PLAN
,o
Attachment 3
F
CETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH
2410 Stillwater Road. • Maplewood, MN 55119
Church (612) 739 -1264 •School (612) 739 -7540
September 21, 1994
Dear Members of the Maplewood City Council:
We, the people of Gethsemane Lutheran Church and School request a
Conditional Use Permit for an addition to our facilities.
For over two years now, we have made an extensive study of our
membership and the community at large assessing the trends and
needs of those whom we serve. Using the results of our study, we
would like to expand our facilities by 13,757 square feet plus
remodel some of our existing space.
These facilities would include: a new pre-- school and kindergar-
ten room, space for Sunday School, anew science lab /classroom, a
community room used primarily for Senior Citizens and other
groups, e.g., scouts, Alanon, accountability groups, etc. , as
well as expanding our current cafeteria* our objective is to
continue to expand our ministry to the whole community.
Our facilities mould be built towards the east of our property
and would continue with our current structural scheme. We would
propose to add extra parking towards the south (main entrance) of
the church adding 22 stalls. Our intentions would also be to
continue to maintain the integrity of our existing property and
to .improve all the entrances and exits from our property onto the
existing streets.
We hope, upon your approval, to be able to begin the
footings /foundation, as soon as possible. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Pastor Christopher Becker
Living under the grace of God, we commit ourselves to grow together in our faith and to see
ourselves, others and the world around us through the loving eyes of our Lord Jesus Christ.
11 Attachment 4
GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH
2410 Stillwater Road e Maplewood, MN 55119
Church (612) 739 -1264 •School (612) 739 -7540
October 13,1994
Planning Commission
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Rd. B
Maplewood, MN 55109
The following is a "letter of justification" which is required as part of our request for a
variance from the City's 50 foot side yard setback requirement.
When Gethsemane Lutheran Church's architects Trossen and Wright, developed the
building and site plans for a proposed building expansion, the assumption was made
that current property lines as visualized were fairly accurate and that our proposed
building structure would be erected well beyond the fifty foot side yard setback from our
east neighbor's property line. (Gethsemane Lutheran presently owns the whole block
except for this one adjoining property.)
Mowever, when the land was surveyed, we discovered that our proposed structure as
drawn on our site plan was 41 feet 9 inches from the newly -drawn surveyed adjoining
property Tine.
Rather than go to the expense of drawing a new site plan and feeling that we had the
cooperation of our adjoining neighbor, we make a request to the Planning Commission
for a variance from the fifty foot side yard setback requirement.
Our proposed building addition which will encroach on the 50 ft, setback is a one -story
brick structure which will be used for additional classrooms. It will in no way alter the
essential character of the area.
It is also of note that part of the property that adjoins us to the east is land that is an
unbuildable lot due to the petroleum hazard below ground level. We are currently
negotiating with Williams Pipeline Company for a future acquisition of that lot as parking
lot expansion for Gethsemane it and when Williams completes purchase of that property
from Philip Leeman.
Gethsemane has had along -time cordial relationship with the City of Maplewood and
we respectfully request approval of our Variance request.
Signed:
ne Messersmith, Business Administrator
Living under the grad of God, we commit ourselves to grow together in our faith and to see
o urs.plVe.s, others and the world around us through the loving e yes o f our Lord Jesus Christ.
12 Attachment 5
GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH
2410 Stillwater Road *Maplewood MN 55119
Church (612) 739-1264 • School 4612) 739-7540
M y -permission is hereb g ranted to Gethsemane
Lutheran Church to build at least fort feet
from m west propert line as shown in the site
plan dated 9/16/94 b Trossen Wri Architects.
Si
f Philip Leeman
Date: C��. l� � � � 9 �
--mmit curse to g rcriA.,, ta in our fai--h and to iL
L-iv-j;)n. Undei- the g race of God, Ak cc... # %-1 4
others and wor./d a,,-ouncol us throu the lovin e of our L d Je�-..,ls Christ.
13 Vtachm'ent 6
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Gethsemane Lutheran Church applied for a conditional use permit to expand
their church and parking lot.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2410 Stillwater Road. The legal description is:
Tract A. All that part of the West 1/2 of Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center
line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 except the East 156.0 feet thereof;
g Y
Tract B. All that part of the west 1/2 of the Northeast quarter of Southwest quarter of Section
25 Township g lying 29 North, Range 22 West, Southerly and Easterly of the center
line of State Trunk Highway No. 212, except the East 156.0 feet of the North 453.0
feet thereof;
Tract C. All that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 25,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center line of State
Trunk Highway No. 212;
which lies southerly and easterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the west quarter corner of said Section 25; thence run easterly on an assumed
azimuth of 89 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds along the east and west quarter line of said
Section 25 for 1786.45 feet to the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road; thence on an azimuth
of 59 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds along the southeasterly .line of Stillwater Road, for 5 0.5 5
feet to a point on the east line of tract A hereinbefore described, which is the point of
beginning of line to be described; thence on an azimuth of 239, degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds
g g
for 459.05 feet; thence on an azimuth of 209 degrees 43 minutes 31 seconds for 163.42 feet;
thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds for 13.97 feet; thence run
southerly 317.11 feet on a non - tangential curve concave to the west, having a radius of
11:85.42 feet, delta angle of 15 degrees 19 minutes 38 seconds and a chord azimuth of 180
degrees 29 minutes .00 seconds; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds
for 90.83 feet; thence deflect to the right on a tangential curve having a radius of 458.68 feet
and a delta angle of 32 degrees 57 minutes 37 seconds for 263.86 feet; thence on an azimuth
of 213 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds for 365.48 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line
of Tract C hereinbefore described and there terminating.
Reserving, however, an easement covering the Southerly 33 feet of the above described
premises for roadway purposes, to be hereafter dedicated for a public highway and to be
designated as East Seventh Street.
14
Attachment 7
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
this permit.
2. On _ , 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations of-the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
conditional use permit, because:
1 The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3 The use would not depreciate property values.
t
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a
nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive .noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness,
electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not
create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into .the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
.
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
15
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of Council
approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1994.
16
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WB EREAS, Gethsemane Lutheran Church applied fora variance from the zoning ordinance.
WIIEREAS, this variance applies to 2410 Stillwater Road. The legal description is:
Tract A. All that part of the West 1/2 of Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center
- line of State Trunk Highway No. 212 except the East 156.0 feet thereof;
Tract B. All that part of the West 1/2 of the Northeast quarter of Southwest quarter of Section
25, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southerly and Easterly of the center
line of State Trunk Highway No. 212, except the East 156.0 feet of the North 453.0
feet thereof;
Tract C. All that part of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 25,
Township 29 North, Range 22 West, lying Southeasterly of the center line of State
Trunk Highway No. 212;
which lies southerly and easterly of the following described line:
Commencing at the west quarter corner of said Section 25; thence run easterly on an assumed
azimuth of 89 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds along the east and west quarter line of said
Section 25 for 1786.45 feet to the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road; thence on an azimuth
of 59 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds along the southeasterly line of Stillwater Road, for 50.55
feet. to a point on the east line of tract A hereinbefore described, which is the point of
beginning of line to be described; thence on an azimuth of 239 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds
for 459.05 feet; thence on an azimuth of 209 degrees 43 minutes 31 seconds for 163.42 feet;
thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds for 13.97 feet; thence run
southerly 317.11 feet on a non - tangential curve concave to the west, having : a radius of
1185.42 feet, delta angle of 15 degrees 19 minutes 38 seconds and a chord azimuth of 180
degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 29 minutes 00 seconds
for 90.83 feet; thence deflect to the right on a tangential curve having a radius of 458.68 feet
and a delta angle of 32 degrees 57 minutes 37 seconds for 263.86 feet; thence on an azimuth
of 213 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds for 365.48 feet, more or less, to a point on the south line
of Tract C hereinbefore described and there terminating.
Reserving, however, an easement covering the Southerly 33 feet of the above described
premises for roadway purposes, to be hereafter dedicated for a public highway and to be
designated as East Seventh Street.
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(6)(b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a setback
of 50 feet.
17
Attachment 8
V`THEREAS, the applicant is proposing a setback of 41 feet, 9 inches.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 8 feet, 3 inches.
WB EREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
L On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
this variance.
2. On , 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and
present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
variance .for the .following reasons:
1. Meeting the Code would cause the applicant undue hardship. The side lot line runs at a
diagonal to the existing building. This makes it hard for the church to add on and still
meet a 50 -foot setback.
2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance for the following reasons:
a. The proposed setback variance is minimal. Only a small corner of the addition
would encroach into the setback area.
b. The addition would not affect the adjacent neighbor's privacy or create a crowding
problem.
c. The addition would be next to the neighbor's back yard and not near his house.
d. Existing trees on the neighbor's property screens his house from the school.
e. The adjacent neighbor has signed a letter agreeing to the setback.
The Maplewood City Council adopted on this resolution on 11 1994.
18
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 11 -15 -94
Boardmember Robinson moved the Commuar�ity ign Review Board approve
the sign plan, dated October 26, 1994, fora 3 square -foot ground sign at dross
utheran Church, 1945 Prosperity Road, cause:
1. 32- square -foot sign wo d not be too large for this site. The church
.prop is 2.19 acres
2. The design o e sign is attractive. The brick base is attractive and would
match the or the church.
3. The meets the ale.
4. The sign would not block driver visibility when exiting the site.
/ $oardmember Anitzberger seconded. Ayes —all
B. Building Addition — Gethsemane Lutheran Church, 2410 Stillwater Road
Jeremy Bork, Trossen Wright Architects, was present representing the church. He
concurred with the recommendations, and explained that the trash enclosure
would be made of concrete block with a brick veneer matching the existing
building, approximately .12 feet high, with a wood - screen gate. Mr. Bork said the
l ight standards would be on the perimeter of the parking lot facing into the lot.
Mr. Bork also said the play area would remain but it will be surrounded by a
sidewalk and curb and gutter, and an attempt would be made to keep all vehicular
traffic away from it. The project is scheduled to begin immediately after City
approval.
Commissioner Anitzberger moved the Community Design Review Board approve
the plans, dated - stamped September 21, 1994, for the Gethsemane Lutheran
Church, subject to the findings required by the Code. The church shall do the
following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit
for this project.
2. Submit the following to the staff before the City issues a building permit:
a. A plan showing the location and design of a trash dumpster
enclosure. The enclosure shall be brick veneer in a color
compatible with the building.
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 11 -15 -94
b. A screening plan for any roof - mounted mechanical equipment.
c. A revised site plan showing a 24- foot -wide driveway on the east
side of the addition. This plan shall also move the two proposed
trees.
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Install a handicap- parking sign for each proposed handicap - parking
space.
b. Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or
adjacent property. (code requirement)
C. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure. (code requirement)
d. Install site security lighting, subject to the approval of the Director
of Public Safety. The light intensity shall not exceed one -foot-
candle at any residential lot line. The light fixtures shall be around
the perimeter of the .parking lot, face into the building as opposed
to facing outside toward the area residents, and be aimed or
shielded so the light source is not visible. (code requirement)
4. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy
if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit
for the required work. The amount shall be 150 % of the cost of the
unfinished work.
C. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to
complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community
Development my approve minor changes.
Commissioner Vidyashankar seconded. Ayes —all
D. Site — e
Planning Commission -3m
Minutes of 11 -21 -94
NEW BUSINESS
Conditional Use Permit Revision: 1255 Cope Avenue (Northern. H dr ics
y )
cretary Olson presented the staff report. John Rose, represen ' g Northern
Hy aulics, answered a question on the outdoor storage.
Commis 'ones Frost moved the Planning Commissio recommend:
L Review the CUP for 1255 Cope Ave nu In one year.
2.. Adoption of th resolution which re sed the conditional use permit for 1255
Cope Avenue. T revisions are follows:
a. All construction us comply with the site plan, received by the City on
September 24, 19 . The Director of Community Development ma
approve minor ange The City Council may approve major changes.
b. There sh be no outside st ge of goods, materials or trash.
C. The anopy shall not be illuminat
d. he hours of operation shall be from 8 . to 8 p.m. Monday - Friday, 8
a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturdays, and 10 a.m. to 4 m. on Sundays.
e. There shall be no overnight parking of trucks.
omrnissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes —all
The motion passed.
B. 2410 Stillwater Road (Gethsemane Lutheran Church)
Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Jeremy Bork of Trossen Wright Architects
spoke for Gethsemane Lutheran Church. Commissioner Thompson asked Mr. Bork to
define the parking area and the bus - traffic plans.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit to expand a
church and parking lot at 2410 Stillwater Road. Approval is based on the
findings required by the Code and subject to the following conditions:
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 11 -21 -94
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The
Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of
Council approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this
deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year..
B. Adoption of the resolution which approves an 8 -foot, 3 -inch side yard setback
variance for a proposed classroom addition at Gethsemane Lutheran Church,
2410 Stillwater Road. Approval is based on the following:
1. Meeting the Code would .cause the applicant undue hardship. The side lot
line runs at a diagonal to the existing building. This makes it hard for the
church to add on and still meet a 50 -foot setback.
2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance for the following
reasons:
a. The proposed setback variance is minimal. Only a small corner of
the addition would encroach into the setback area.
b. The addition would not affect the adjacent neighbor's privacy or
create a crowding problem.
C. The addition would be next to the neighbor's back yard and not near
,his house.
d. Existing trees on the neighbor's property screen his house from the
school
e. The adjacent neighbor has signed a letter agreeing to the setback.
Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes --all
The motion passed.
--,1:229 Edgerton Street (Edgerton Elementary
Secretary Olson Ares ort and answered a question from the
MEMORANDUM
TO; City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Edgerton Elementary School Expansion
LOCATION: 1929 Edgerton Street
DATE: November 30, 1994
CONTENTS
ct i on by Coup cif. g
En ,_ a
liodified..�.... ...
INTRODUCTION ............................ ..............................2
P roject Description ......................... ............................... 2
Requests
.................................. ..............................
q .
BACKGROUND .............................. ..............................
DISCUSSION ................................ ..............................
RECOMNMNDATIONS ........................ ..............................
CITIZENS' COMNffiNTS ...................... ............................... 7
REFERENCE INFORMATION ................. ............................... 9
SITE DESCRIPTION ........................ ..............................9
SURROUNDING LAND USES ............... ............................... 9
PLANNING ........................................................ 9......9
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS .............. ............................... 9
CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL ............ ............................... 9
CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE APPROVAL ...... ............................... 9
PUBLIC SAFETY...... .............. ............................... .10
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Independent School District (ISD) 623 has revised the plans to expand Edgerton Elementary
School. (See the location and property line maps on pages l l and 12 and the new site plan on
page 13.) The City Council approved plans last March. (See the previously approved site plan on
page 14.) The District is proposing the following changes to the existing school:
1. Add 14,734 square feet of building. (There would be 14,080 square feet of building
demolished and 28,814 square feet of new building added.) The new space is for a
gymnasium, cafeteria and additional classrooms. The proposed additions would have exteriors
of brick and decorative concrete block. (See the building elevations on Sheet 3 of the attached
plans.) (Since the previous plan, the gymnasium has been moved from the southwest corner to
the northeast corner of the building.)
2. Revise the parking lot and drives as follows:
a. Replace the westerly parking lot with a one -way drive for buses. Six parking spaces
would remain. (The previous plan had the one -way drive, but not the six spaces.)
b. Add ten bus - parking spaces north of the building. (The previous plan had a larger bus
parking area.)
c. Add parking spaces south of the building. (This is similar to the previous plan.)
(The District has dropped the easterly parking lot that they proposed on the previous plan.)
3.:Provde 67 general parking stalls and ten bus parking stalls. The bus parking lot would be
available for vehicle parking in the evenings. The District .based the number of parking spaces
on the projected staff, visitor and community needs. (See the letters on pages 15 and 18.) (The
previous plan had 88 stalls plus the bus parking.)
4. Replace the playground equipment that is north of the school. The District would add two new
play areas near the north lot line. They would surface the play areas with wood chips and
border them with timbers. (The previous plan also proposed to move the play equipment.)
5. Add a new dumpster enclosure at the southeast corner of the new parking lot. The enclosure
would be concrete block and brick to match the building. (The previous plan had the dumpster
enclosure attached to the southeast corner of the building.)
6. Remove a small shed from the west side of the school. (Same as the previous proposal.)
7. The plans show the removal of a pump house on the south side of the school. The applicant
2
has since decided to keep the pump house. This would result in losing a parking space. The
applicant would add another parking space on the west side of the building.
Requests
The School District is requesting that the City do the following:
1, Revise the conditional use permit (CUP) to enlarge the school, based on new plans. The Code
requires a CUP for schools. (See the letter on page 17.)
2. Approve alive -foot building setback variance from the Edgerton Street right -of -way for the
proposed gymnasium. The Code requires 30 feet, The District is proposing 25 feet. (See the
architect's letter on pages 18 and 19.)
3. Approve the design plans.
BACKGROUND
On March 8, 1993, the City Council authorized the Mayor and City Manager to sign an
agreement with ISD 623. The City Council agreed to pay $250,000 from park funds to help
finance the proposed gymnasium.
On March 28, 1994, the City. Council approved the following for the Edgerton Elementary
School expansion:
1. A CUP to expand the school
2. A CUP to structurally alter a nonconforming use. The District proposed to curb the edge of an
existing driveway with a nonconforming setback.
3. A variance from the requirement for in- ground lawn irrigation
4. A 36.5 -foot setback variance for the proposed gymnasium (This variance is no longer needed.)
5. Architectural, site and landscape plans
DISCUSSION
The architect has stated that the number of parking .spaces proposed will be enough. (See her
letter on pages 15 and 16.) The CUP states that the City may require additional parking if
needed. The problem will be with evening use of the gymnasium. The Director of Parks and
Recreation estimates that people coming to the gymnasium at night may have 36-50 cars. The
3
bus lot would hold 26 cars. This means there would be on- street parking. Cars parked on either
Y m �Y �
side of the drivewa block visibi for cars t ry i ng to leave the site. The City Council
should request that the County post both sides of the driveway for "No Parking." The Director of
Parks and Recreation feels that the City Y ma have to p ave a parking lot on the City's lot to the
north.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on pages 21 and 22. This resolution revises the conditional use permit
to expand the school. The permit is based on the findings required by the Code and subject
to the following conditions: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.)
1. All construction shall follow the site plan (stamed August 29. 1994) approved by the
City, except that the pump um house will remain and a seventh parking stall will be added to
p
the west parking lot. The Director of Community Development may approve minor
changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after Council
approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. - rnv- a%efnvrn DolrstIrtw Snmz- aWsrg- nuoe entnan- purr- air- ai-csrror pvTCmzarzcscuur :Gituv t.....�...
fifti. ,iee. The City may require additional parking if needed.
5. The School District shall provide for evening car parkn,in_the bus - loading area. The
access drives to thisparking area shall be open during the eve nings.
6. The School District shall allow the to const_ ru t .a walkway from the City's .property
to the north parking lot.
B. Adopt the resolution on page 23. This resolution ends the 36.5 -foot side yard setback
variance for the gymnasium on the west side of Edgerton Elementary School. The School
District is no longer proposing this addition.
C. Adopt the resolution on pages 24 and 25. This resolution approves a five -foot setback
variance for the gY mnasium addition to Edgerton Elementary School. The variance is based
on the following findings:
1. It would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance for the following reasons:
a. The closer setback would not effect the houses across the street. The nearest
house would be 150 feet from the proposed gymnasium. The typical minimum
4
separation is 120 feet (a 30-foot setback on each side of the street and a 60 -foot-
wide right -of -way).
b. The closer setback would not effect the adjacent properties on the west side of
Edgerton Street.
2. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship. The School District cannot
move the gymnasium further back and still meet the size needed by the City.
3. This variance is less than the previously approved 36.5-foot setback variance.
D. Approve the plans stamped August 29, 1994 for the. Edgerton Elementary School
expansion. The following conditions apply:
1. This approval supersedes the previous plan approval of March 28, 1994.
2. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit for this
project.
3. Submit the following for staff approval before the City issues a building permit:
a. A revised site plan showing the following:
(1) Striping for ninety- degree parking east of the bus striping.
(2) Widen the north drive to 42 feet.
b. A plan showing the design of the trash dumpster enclosure. The enclosure must
match the color of the building and have a gate that is 100% opaque. (code
requirement)
c. A revised landscape plan showing:
(1) Screening west of the southerly parking lot that is sue- feet -tall and 80%
opaque. (code requirement)
(2) Sod on all disturbed areas.
d. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan for the City Engineer's
approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion Control Handbook.
4. Complete the following before occupying the additions:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install reflectorized stop signs at all emits and ahandicap- parking sign for each
handicap - parking space.
c. Screen all new roof- mounted equipment visible from streets or adjacent property.
(code requirement) The applicant shall submit the design to Staff for approval.
d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure that meets the City Code. The enclosures must
match the color of the building.
e. Install continuous concrete curbing around all existing and proposed parking and
drive areas. (code requirement)
f. Install site lighting, subject to the Director of Public Safety's approval. Lighting
shall not exceed one foot - candle of fight at .any residential property line. Lights
shall be shielded or aimed so the light source is not visible. (code requirement)
5. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or
welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required
work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete any
unfinished work.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes.
E. Request that the County post both sides Edgerton Street, adjacent to the school driveway,
for "No Parking. "
G
CITIZENS' COMMENTS
I surveyed the owners of the 61 properties within 350 feet of the Edgerton Elementary School. Of
the 24 replies, 16 were in favor, three objected and five had no comment.
I n Favor •
1. Five feet is not very much to argue about. Please get this project going, its been two years.
(no name given)
2. We need more space for our children. (Sukhtipyaroge, 605 Roselawn Avenue)
3. This school is a wonderful neighbor. (Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan - Society of
Minnesota, 550 Roselawn Avenue)
4. This a better plan than before. (Dettman, 1897 Edgerton Street)
5. Thetraffic area for the gym will be a little further from the comer of Edgerton and Roselawn
than before. That comer is already too congested. (Kramer, 1855 Edgerton Street)
6. It does not seem to adversely affect any adjoining property lines. (Schreier, 1949 Desoto
Street)
7. It is an improvement to the school and neighborhood. (Evans, 573 Bellwood Avenue)
8. I know the school has put a lot of thought - into it. (Thompson, 565 Bellwood Avenue)
9. I do not see that this would affect our property. (Sether, 1743 Roxarma Lane)
10. I have no objection as long as there is not to be a parking lot also on the east side. (Butler,
1967 Payne Avenue)
11. We need a better school! ! (Gruber,. 549 Bellwood Avenue)
12. The proposed driveway and proposed gym and proposed . parking seem to be OK to me.
(Ostergren, 2 Edgerton Street)
13. They should remove the high bank on the northeast corner for safety of auto travel on both
Roselawn Avenue and Edgerton Street. (Anderson, 530 Roselawn Avenue)
V�
Opposed
1. I do not agree with the building of the gymnasium in the 1st place. It's a waste of time.
(Bergh, 495 Roselawn Avenue)
2. We don't need a community ed. gym. This property should be for the elementary kids to
have their playground. They are more important than a community ed. gym. We are not in
favor of the variance. Why make rules and then break them? (Cardinal, 1970 Edgerton
Street)
3. I object to this proposal. This expansion should not occur. (Arksey and Barnett, 1982
Edgerton Street)
8
REFERENCE INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site .size: 12.78 gross acres and 6 net acres (school site)
Existing land use: Edgerton Elementary School
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: City property (the former Maplewood Heritage Center site)
South: Roselawn Avenue, a house and the Maplewood Good Samaritan Center
West: Houses and ball fields
East: Edgerton Street and single dwellings
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: S (school) (See the land use plan on page 20.)
Zoning: F (farm residence district)
ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS
Section 36- 437(3) requires a CUP for schools.
Section 36- 28(c)(6)(a) requires a nonresidential building to be set back 30 feet from a street right-
of -way.
CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL
Section 36- 442(a) states that the City Council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. (See
findings 1 -9 in the resolution on pages 21 and 22.)
CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE APPROVAL
State law requires that the City Council make the following findings to approve a variance from
the zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
9
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
. "Undue hardship ", as used in connection with the f a variance means the p rop e rty
g � p p rtY
in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed b the official
y
controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his p ro per ty, q not
created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of
the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an nd
u ue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
PUBLIC SAFETY
Provide an automatic fire sup cession sys
p Y
p:secMedgerto4.cup
I. Location Map
2. Property Line/Zoning Map
3. Proposed Site Plan
. 4. Previously Approved Site Plan
3. Architect's Letter. of Parking Justification dated August 4, 1994
6. Architect'$ CUP Letter dated September Z, 1994
7. Architect's Setback Vniance better dated August 4 1994
8. Land Use Plan
9. Resolution --CUP Revision
10. Resohdion-- Setback Variance Tgt�stion
11. Resolution -- setback Variance
12. Plana date- stamped August 29, 1994 (separate attachment)
10
Attachment 1
• CT pAO ov
r .
,.. 4n �
CC C* AVE ♦-
•
DD 0-2
.
e CT.
1
i
•
• • • , • _• •.I� 1• • • • . • • • ♦ • .� •
• .1• ` • • • `�• ��. • • • 0•S'•••`
0 lip
..:'a off. .,
Kerr
• • •. LARK AVE. - V� t� DR. /
oks
% t IAUR IE RD.
L4UlbE CT.
t
• �.. •.� :.. ' •...
� � J a te' y
... h Y /
CT.
. r � a � �� we'tawrt
( C
r Av Z QDRIDCE AV
R IDG E E. � � .
Sandy 8Et.1�ONT A. W
Croke • BELMONT
r. t; -- SKILLMAN AVE. � AV,
N AVE. � KENyv pop K
4J LA.
VERNON t o. �z c.� �n � 3
p t; m
� W
4S AVE. _ I, o VERNON
g o �
0
s 27
_ w 2 sE�.tw�oflo
00o AVE. B ELL vrpoo o AVE. AVE.
o
E AVE.
CT. 3
Z • t3 Dot
W
Itwx RIPLEY m Zf
• AVE.
�,. AVE•
�� cn w KIN � < AVE• � and
s o v -- r "� �W�
O AvE. w - PRIG AVE. � l�olcr
W i/1
'E NTEUR g AV£. 1"2 °L Q <6>
lb
The < W
• • •• • • • • •• • ♦ •• • 1 • • • • • • 1 • ••• • we
SAINT PAUL,
LOCATION MAP
11
4
N
Attachment 2
st
s '
%zl 1
0 co 7 (TI). -- . •� m L I O P AP C
7 � `fib a - at . j 0� 8 @ 4 1-) O �c, o C3Z�
o g9 `1�► �t ►.
o
3 0 142 •�- t 3.,t.... ' �c � q s g,$. ` �.z S r
o - ysd.%z ---
3 13 3
�e 41.5 1
4 a 123.60 �SCo• g9.o _ y
s `
N dl t (s) ?, '^
' O4 �"'J
3 _ 1 cA
0 0 (75)
t '
2021 owl
! , 243 _ -
• o.
S3.c
O
4.70 ac. �.2�ac 3 �4toac _
( 7-3)
L20
I
2ou •-
—
Vi ila e of Maplewood ti�!1�� cf M�
8� 2005 0 2002.
v N •
7 a
arc
1 c
9
8
2 t
'Ryac
...........
�� d
EDGERTON LA SS,
ELEMENTARY:
�.......
SCHOOL OiSTRIC N° 623 1970 2
SCHOOL
- 3
71
C
P LA YIN G YI FIE
..�: {�� 1960
,t:,�, g�
,?�. n 7
I
'. ,, A
4 0 od o 0 to ` ' t. } �' 194E a
...........
...........
...........
�J I f 2 �'.
. 7 ° J Vic. ao *; `� ....
;...: • f 7 t3
"' • �0
5
• �_,,-- 1938
�o
W
�C n►
f.
all
6
f :x' a
1 93 0
3
0
24
3 .3 'f 1 ?5 75 1 75 1 7 1 75 75 7 5 1 '15 Ts + ,�,�•• '•� �
NOW mmoft
AdROSELAWN -Auv r'-'* - - "MAN U_
1305 Co 4
3 2 7 F' .G 3 z z6 4 75' - 14 &0 ' C ,
r . GOac 2 .23 aC
r
,p z o 5 � 1855
0 Nt �3G
.r o 5 r in 5 t
CD '� 9 .► ,
N r .•
� N
ww wrr i/I�n �
PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP
12
4
N
Attachment 3
-
L . 4
• t
eswc " I
q •
I•
S �'•0' it0 -O' !!••i• TI'-I' x`11
1
PROPOSED BUS PANG o .
r
I PROPOSED
i �� IDRN"EWAY
t ^ ^ PROPOSED
G YM ADD'N
I .I
T O s I n I ui
I W
IE•- �rrra as cawnvcraN � �
I n .. d . � cowaets
soon""
o�K �
I I
ornr un�- W �•, :I Z
cum. Typ , w
MINIMA W) ( 7
C
cc
w
w r ^
^I t
44O• 2r ."
0 0 �
. a. �eic 4••� vl• "I rwPAcn . !•.�• .�.�• �••e•� � 1r� i b � rcd . !•.�,• •!s•.e• ,3•.,•
24•
IT
w
t
I � I ♦ t I �•
i I + t
,•� "•'�. L !r • !'•i• .133'•0' ,'a' t ! ��S . !' -�• i •1 >!le • ..t,.• !y. • 2460 3
R X16TV410
UN1 � l�DE1WLK n
"' 'r rIVTGTI i 1 E 02!200
\ - ..s3fy0•.. � ..300••
L.d
ROSELAWN AV ENUE
SITE PLAN
13
4
N
Attachment 4
SO "ACES wK EV
i {
• c t • t ! ! !
i
1 � 1
1•
i PROPOSED BUS PARKING
!.
3 4 00
j PROPOSED
elm � DRWAYS
��
F
E 1-1 .
". ` I
1 W
W
\ ••
O
� I 1 •
W
PROPOSE
GYMNASIUM
v
••. : • r •• •• • •� 1
• i ►! j ' 1 1 1 1 '
I
,..• • % -4 EXISTING DRIVEWAYS = - ---= • ="- dwI
ROSEUIWN ♦VF'NUr
x
� a
� 1
to ! Y •C :0
.irq -::
4b
1
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN
3/28!94
4
N
c Attachment 5
Alexander F. Ritter, A.I.A.
Michael J. Plautz, A.I.A.
)ick B. Daniels, A.I.A.
im Fitzhugh, A.L.A.
Rober M. Lucius, A.I.A.
David C. Norback, A.I.A.
perry Wobken, A.I.A.
4 August 1994
► City Council
City .of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Edgerton Elementaty School
Addition and Renovation
1929 Edgerton Street, Maplewood, MN
Comm. No. 6211.901.01
Parking Criteria (Revised Plan)
Dear Council Members:
The intent of this letter is to explain how the number of parking spaces was determined
for this project. Although Maplewood's Zoning Ordinance states in. Section 36- 22(5) that
"schools must have a minimum of one (parking) space for every 20 auditorium seats," as
proposed, Edgerton Elementary School will not have an auditorium, so the number of
parking spaces was based on projected staff, visitor and community needs.
The previously approved site plan (dated 15 October 1993) provided 66 stalls for school
staff and visitors and 22 stalls for Family Education Center staff and clients. Due to
budget constraints, the Family Education Center has been eliminated from the building's
program.
The new site plan, dated 15 July 1994, shows areas for parking on the north and south
sides of the building. The south parking area is adjacent to the main building entrance and
will be used during the day by building staff and visitors; the 67 parking spaces shown
will provide one space per person for all full-time and part -time staff (59 people), five
spaces for building visitors and three designated accessible spaces (one of which will be
van accessible). The north parking area provides a separate drive and parking area for
school buses.
At night, when the building will be used for Maplewood Park and Recreation programs,
an additional 12 spaces can be accommodated in the bus par king area, providing a total of
79 parking spaces.
RSP Architects Ltd.
120 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55401
FAX 612 •339.6760
612 *339.0313
15
W
t
City Council
4 August 1994
Page 2
We believe that the proposed number of parking spaces will adequately serve the needs of
both the School and the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns
regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Diana Bellgowan, A.I.A.
Project Architect
Dick B. Daniels, A.I.A.
Principal -in- Charge
Copy: John Thein, Roseville Area Schools
Merrie Zacharas, Roseville Area Schools
John Ahern, Edgerton Elementary School
File 3
DBDlpjp
rsysch \edgerton11to7 -13 . dbd
16
if P
Attachment 6
2 September 1994
X99 i
SEP.
}
vn Lnu U t.3
► City Council
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Alexander F. Ritter, A.I.A.• Edgerton Elementary School
Michael J. Plautz, A.I.A. Addition and Renovation (Resubmittal)
1929 Edgerton Street, Maplewood, MN
Dick B. Daniels, A.I.A. Comm. No. 6211.015.01
Jim Fitzhugh A.I.A. Request for Conditional Use Permit
Robert M. Lucius, A.I.A.
Dear Council Members
David C. Norback, A.I.A.
Terry Wobken, A.I.A. we respectfully request the City Council to consider this application for a. Conditional Use
Permit on the Edgerton Elementary School. The proposed school construction will
increase classroom size in the existing building, and add a new cafeteria, classroom win
and gymnasium. The new gymnasium will be approximately four tunes larger than the
existing school gymnasium and is partially funded by the City of Maplewood for use as a
community recreation gym.
Currently, the school's parking lot does not conform to Maplewood's ordinance requiring
concrete curbs at parking areas and drives, but this will be remedied in the course of
construction and all of the existing and new paved areas will have concrete curbs.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
h r
Diana Bellgowan, A.I.A. -Dick B. Daniels, A.I.A.
Project Architect Principal-in-Charge
g
Copy: John Thein, Roseville Area Schools
John Ahern, Edgerton Elementary School
File 3
DB /pjp
rwwhledgerton11W9 -2a. db
RSP Architects Ltd.
120 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55401
FAX 6129 339 6760
612.339.0313
17
Attachment 7
4 August 1994
RSP Architects Ltd.
120 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55401
FAX 612 •339. 6760
612 339 9 0313
18
► City Council
City of Maplewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 551W
±exander F. Ritter, A.I.A.
RE: Edgerton Elementary School
1ich J. Pl A.I.A.
Addition and Renovation
1929 Edgerton Street, Maplewood, MN
ck B. Daniels, A.I.A.
Comm. No. 6211.015.01
- Fitzhugh, A.I.A.
Request for Variance (Revised)
Dbert M. Lucius, A.I.A.
'
Dear Council Members:
avid C. Norback, A.I.A.
- rry Wobken A.I.A.
We respectfully request the City Council to take into consideration the following
wing written
justification for deviations from the Maplewood Zoning rdinance on the proposed
g p p ed
Edgerton Elementary School site plan dated 29 July 1994. The site plan dated 15 October
1993 (previously approved by the City Council), has been revised relocatin g the
gymnasium to the northeast corner of the building and deleting the parking on the east
side.
1. Building Setback, from Residential Property Section 36-71(2) of the Zonin
Ordinance requires a 30' building setback from the property line abuttin g Edgerton
erton
Street. The proposed site plan shows a setback of 25'-0" between the new gY mnasium
and the east property line.
The new gymnasium is required by the Maplewood Park & Recreation Board oard to be a
minimum of 90 ft. by 115 ft in order to meet their needs. The location of m '
e gym is
10 ft. from the existing Media Center on the east side of the building to allow for an
exit corridor and permit access to the gY m from the north side of the site
Functionally, this location provides for easy access to parkin for communi • g � use a
'
strop g connection and adjacency to the existing play fields and the old Heritage Center
site, which the City intends to develop for outdoor communi activities. W '
ty a believe
the new plan is more amenable for community use.
The reduced setback would not cause a threat to the property values, safety, health or
general welfare of the residential property owners across Edgerton Street.
We are asking that you grant this variance in lieu of the previous setback variance for the
gymnasium when it was located in the southwest corner of the site adjacent to residential
� t
property. We believe that the new plan will have less impact on nearby oe
Y p P rtY owners.
RSP Architects Ltd.
120 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, MN 55401
FAX 612 •339. 6760
612 339 9 0313
18
w
• -f s
City Council
4 August 1994
Page 2
Thank you for your consideration of this issue.
Sincerely,
Diana Bellgowan, A.I.A.
Project Architect
Copy: John Thein, Roseville Area Schools
John Ahern, Edgerton Elementary School
File 3
DB /pjp
nvsW"IgerWn11t07 -2I . db
Dick B. Daniels, A.I.A.
Principal -in- Charge
19
t�
10
sent-I I-or
M
OWN
•s ii1 - - -
MUM '°�Z���. /.err ..to■r ®Iii / '�
I X11111111 �10 -.�� ►...�..
` 1111!111 == : �J =!. ,
X11 :1. ` — _ ' - �,�.• --�.
; .�,, �, ��" i t�■s■••■•
I I n LNL V, I qrk,
Z344".& ink OLE:: jug'. M Kul i
L�l lu
i i / • / i i f • / irf�A � � ! ! 1 � / / / r t ! / �
m om ...... s w
nii A ' • -m► r Mau •Mf. its
�I Mall
low pope iew s.s I
'. i.
t tt® MUM •-. 4 .•-.
Aa r-
MA IN ..r.,.... a =11 !- il•, i�.
t %rLAi AN
,...� w • tw.. �' f in
Mom" +!�
n It - =---
.............. W/ --Aww--
1
PP —
s�
P
IA
1.
�s ffl.AA
Attachment 9
RESOLUTION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVISION
WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 623 is requesting that the City revise their
conditional use permit to expand a school and for the curbing of blacktop with a nonconforming
setback.
WBER. EAS, this permit applies to 1929 Edgerton Street. The legal description is:
SUBJ TO STS & EX S 292.96 FT & EX N 155.04 FT
OF S 448 FT OF E 468.6 FT & EX N 352.96 FT OF
W 108 FT & EX N 160 FT OF E 313 FT TIM S 1/2
OF SE '1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22
SUBJ TO AVE AND ST TBE S 448 FT OF E 468 6/10
FT OF NO 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22
SUBJ TO EDGERTON ST THE N 160 FT OF E 313 FT
OF S 1 /2 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17
TOWN 29 RANGE 22
WIMREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
this permit.
2. On December 12, 1994 the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a
notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council
also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council revise the above - described
conditional use permit based on new building and site plans. The City approves the revision
because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in
conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
21
2. The use would not .change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of
operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance
to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes,
water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical
interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only rriinimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create
traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets,
police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and
parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic
features into the development design.
9. The use would cause mal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan (stamped August 29, 1994) approved by the
City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year after Council
approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The City may require additional parking if needed.
5. The School District shall provide for evening car parking in the bus - loading area. The
access drives to this parking area shall be open during the evenings.
6. The School District shall allow the City to construct a walkway from the City's property
to the north parking lot.
The Maplewood City Council adopted .this resolution on , 1994.
22
Attachment 10
RESOLUTION
VARIANCE TERMINATION
WHEREAS, the Maplewood City Council granted a 36.5 -foot side yard setback variance to Independent
School District (ISD) Na 623 on March 28, 1994.
WAHER.EAS, this variance allowed the ISD No. 623 to build a gymna addition 0 33.5 feet from their
west lot line.
VVBEREAS, the City Code required 70 feet.
WBEREAS, this variance applies to 1929 Edgerton Street. The legal description ' '
g g is.
SUBJ TO STS & EX S 292.96 FT & EX N 155.04 FT
OF S 448 FT OF E 468.6 FT & EX N 352.96 FT OF
W 108 FT &EXN 160 FTOFE313 FT THE S 1/2
OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22
I•� i`
SUBJ TO AVE AND ST THE S 44.8 FT OF E 468 6/10
FT OF NO 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22
SUBJ TO EDGERTON ST THE N 160 FT OF E 313 FT
OF S 1/2 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17
TOWN 29 RANGE 22
WHEREAS, ISD No. 623 no longer proposes to build their new asium on the '
gy�mn a west side of the
school.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council end the variance
. ty granted for the
gymnasium addition on the west side of Edgerton Elementary School.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1994.
23
Attachment 11
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Independent School District No. 623 applied for a variance from the zoning ordinance.
.WHEREAS, this variance applies to 1929 Edgerton Street. The legal description is:
SUBJ TO STS & EX S 292.96 FT & EX N 155.04 FT
OF S 448 FT OF E 468.6 FT & EX N 352.96 FT OF
W 108 FT &EXN 160 FTOFE313 FT THE S 1/2
OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22
0
SUBJ TO AVE AND ST THE S 448 FT OF E 468 6/10
FT OF NO 1/4 OF SECTION 17 TOWN 29 RANGE 22
SUBJ TO EDGERTON ST THE N 160 FT OF E 313 FT
OF S 1/2, OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 17
TOWN 29 RANGE 22
WHEREAS, Section 36- 28(c)(6)(a) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires the proposed
gymnasium addition to have a 30 -foot setback from the Edgerton Street right -of -way.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a 25 -foot setback.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of 5 feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
I. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
this variance.
2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also
considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
24
---e 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for
the following reasons:
1. It would- meet . the spirit and intent of the ordinance for the following reasons:
a. The closer setback would not effect the houses across the street. The nearest house would be
.150 feet from the proposed gymnasium.. The typical minimum separation is 120 feet (a 30 -foot
setback on each side of the street and a 60-foot-Wide _ right -of -way).
b. The closer .setback would not effect the adjacent properties on the west side of Edgerton Street.
20 Strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship. The School District cannot move the
gymnasium further back and still meet the size needed by the City.
3. This variance is less than the previously approved 36.5 -foot setback variance.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1994.
25
Planning Commission 4-
Minutes of 11 -21 -94
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the City. The
Director of Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. a proposed construction must be subs Bally started within one year of
C cil approval or the permit shall end. he Council may extend this
de a ine for one year.
3. The Ci Council shall review this rmit in one year.
B. Adoption of the esolution which ap oves an 8 -foot, 3 -inch side yard setback
variance for a pro sed classroom ddition at Gethsemane Lutheran Church,
2410 Stillwater Roa . Approval i based on the following:
1. Meeting the Code woul cause .the applicant undue hardship. The side lot
line runs at a diago al the existing building. This makes it hard for the
church to add on an till meet a 50 -foot setback.
2. The variance wou melt the intent of the ordinance for the following
reasons:
a. The pr posed setback `ance is minimal. Only a small corner of
the a dition would encr ch into the setback area.
b. a addition would not aff t the adjacent neighbor's privacy or
reate a crowding problem.
C. The addition would be next to a neighbor's back yard and not near
his house.
d. Existing trees on the neighbor's property screen his house from the
school. �
e. The adjacent neighbor has signed a letteX agreeing to the setback.
mmissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes —all
/ The motion passed.
C. 1929 Edgerton Street (Edgerton Elementary School)
Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered a question from the
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 11 -21 -94
Commission. Dick Daniels and Diana Bellgowan, RSP Architects, represented the
school district. Mr. Daniels explained the planned construction schedule. Ms.
Bellgowan expressed a concern of the school that they be included in the lannin
p g
when the north site (the old Heritage Center) is developed so the walkway from that
site doesn't conflict with their playground.
Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which revised the conditional use permit to expand
the school. The permit is based on the findings required by the Code and subject
to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan (stamped August 29, 1994)
approved by the City except that the pump house will remain and a
seventh parking stall will be added to the west parking lot. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year
after Council approval or the permit shall end. The Council may extend
this deadline for one year.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
4. The City may require additional parking if needed.
5. The School District shall provide for evening car parking in the bus -
loading area. The access drives to this parking area shall be open during
the evenings.
6. The School District shall allow the City to construct a walkway from the
City's property to the north parking lot.
B. Adoption of the resolution which ends the 36.5 -foot side yard setback variance
for the gymnasium on the west side of Edgerton Elementary School. The school
district is no longer proposing this addition.
C. Adoption of the resolution which approves a five -foot setback variance for the
gymnasium addition to Edgerton Elementary School. The variance is based on
the following findings:
1. It would meet the spirit and intent of the ordinance for the following
reasons:
Planning Commission -6-
Minutes of 11 -21 -94
a. The closer setback would not effect the houses across the street. The
nearest house would be 150 feet from the proposed gymnasium. The
typical minimum separation is 120 feet (a 30 -foot setback on each
side of the street and a 60- foot -wide right of way).
b. The closer setback would not effect the adjacent properties on the
west side of Edgerton Street.
2. Strict enforcement of the Code would cause undue hardship. The School
District cannot move the gymnasium further back and still meet the size
needed by the City.
3. This variance is less than the previously approved 36.5 -foot setback
variance.
Commissioner Frost seconded. Ayes -all
The motion passed.
Planning Fees Ordinance
Se tary Olson presented the staff report and an ered questions.
Commissi er Rossbach moved the Planni Commission recommend:
1. Approval the revisions in Co unity Development Department
license /pernu es and service charges effective January 1, 1995.
2. Approval of the first ad' g of an ordinance to increase the planning fees.
Commissioner Kittridge s onde Ayes —all
The motion passed.
VII. VISITOR PRESENT IONS
There were no vis' or presentations.
VIII. COMMISSIO PRESENTATIONS
A. Nov ber 14 Council Meeting: Mr. Frost and Mr. Olson reported on this meeting.
B. No ember 28 Council Meeting: Mr. Kittridge will attend.
Community Design Review Board -2-
Minutes of 11 -22 -94
oazdmernber Thompson moved the Community Design Review Board r mmend
de ' of the request fora 34- square -foot sign variance for the Mapl ood II United
Artists eater at 1793 Beam Avenue, on the basis that:
1. Strict e cement of the ordinance would not e undue hardship because of
circumstanc unique to the property and consideration. The applicant's sign
copy dilemma is e to the sign's de ' and not due to unique circumstances
with the property.
2. The United Artists si for lewood I movie theater advertises six screens
and is only 173 s e feet.
3. The apps t could enlarge the sign cop and stay within the size limits
requjrda by the Code.
i3oardmember Anitzberger seconded,' Ayes —all
B. Building Addition -- Edgerton Elementary School, 1929 Edgerton Street
Diana Bellgowan and Dick Daniels, of RSP Architects, explained the reasons for the
revision in the plans and described the changes. Mr. Daniels said the school district
was receiving funds from the City of Maplewood and would use the gy m in
partnership with the school. Ms. Bellgowan also said they would be using a clay -like,
8- by 16 -inch structural brick that would closely match the existin g brick and all of
the windows in the building will also be replaced. There would be one P iece of roof-
top equipment over the cafeteria area.
Commissioner Thompson moved the Community Design Review Board recommend:
D. Approval of the plans stamped August 29, 1994 for the Edgerton Elementary
School expansion. The following conditions apply:
1. This approval supersedes the previous plan approval of March 28, 1994.
2. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a building permit
for this project.
3. Submit the following for staff approval before the City issues a building
permit: '.
a. A revised site plan showing the following:
(1) Striping for ninety- degree parking east of the bus striping.
I
A
Community Design Review Board -3-
Minutes of 11 -22 -94
(2) Widen the north drive to 42 feet.
b. A plan showing the design of the, trash dumpster enclosure. The
enclosure must match the color of the building and have a gate that is
100% opaque. (code requirement)
+c. A revised landscape plan showing:
(1) Screening west of the southerly parking lot that is six - feet -tall
and 80% opaque. (code requirement)
(2) Sod on all disturbed areas.
d. A grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plan for the City
Engineer's approval. The erosion control plan shall be consistent
with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion
Control Handbook.
4. Complete the following before occupying the additions:
a. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
b. Install reflectorzed stop signs at all exits and a handicap - parking
sign for each handicap - parking space.
C. Screen all new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or
adjacent property. (code requirement) The applicant shall submit the
design to Staff for approval.
d. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure that meets the City Code. The
enclosures must match the color of the building.
e. Install continuous concrete curbing around all existing and proposed
parking and drive areas. (code requirement)
f. Install site lighting, subject to the Director of Public Safety's
approval. Lighting shall not exceed one foot - candle of light at any
residential property line. Lights shall be shielded or aimed so the
light source is not visible. (code requirement)
5. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy
if:
■ t
Community Design Review Board - 4 -
Minutes of 11 -22 =94
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public
health, safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for
the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the
unfinished work.
C. The City receives an agreement that will allow the City to complete
any unfinished work.
6. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes.
E. Request that the County post both sides Edgerton Street, adjacent to the school
driveway, for "No Parking."
Boardmember Anitzberger seconded. Ayes all
- �,VIi. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
V
1_
There were no visitor presentations.
Ville 13PARD PRESENTATIONS
o�
Boar �` -mber Anitzber er mentioned the PI Commission at its meeting d�i� g � g of
Novembe2 1, had a concern about the parki of of the Gethsemane Lutheran
Church additioA that had previously bee pproved by the Board.
IX. STAFF PRESEN TIONS
Board Member represen a for December 12 City Council Meeting: Boardmember
Thompson
Secretary Eks d said he had a pl ue to present to Mike Holder after the meeting.
Mr. Ek and discussed the meeting sche . led for December 5, 1994 with the City
Co il.
X. ADJOURNMENT
,`` Meeting adj ourned at 8: 10 p.m.
AGENDA N0.
AGENDA REPORT
E n a c^ r ' c (I ���������r
^�yIie , 'R
TO: City Manager Rea e ct e d
Date
FROM: Finance Director and Community Development Director
RE: INCREASE IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SERVICE
CHARGES
DATE: October 24, 1994
INTRODUCTION
It is proposed that the Community Development Department service charges be revised effective
January 1, 1995*
BACKGROUND
It has been past practice to raise service charges annually to keep up with inflation. In 1993 a User
Fee- Study was completed for the Community Development Department to insure that service charges
finance an appropriate portion of the service costs.
The User Fee Study report contained recommendations on 50 individual license /permit fees and
service charges for the Community Development Department. For each item, it had information on
the unit volume,. current fee, costs to provide the service, recommended fee, phase -in schedule for
recommended fee, estimated increased revenue from the recommended fee and subsidy amount after
the recommended fee is phased in. On 5- 24 -93, the Council approved the recommended fees for
1993 and made the increases effective July 1, 19930
At this time, it would be appropriate to continue with the fee increases recommended in the User Fee
Study. Also, it would be appropriate to increase all other Community Development Department fees
by 3 % to keep up with inflation.
It should be noted that the recommended fees in the User Fee Study will produce additional revenues
of $212,000 over five years. The cost of the User Fee Study was $9,500.
4.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Council (1) approve revisions in Community Development Department
license/permit fees and services charges listed in Exhibit A effective January 1, 1995 and (2) approve
first reading of an ordinance (Exhibit B) to increase the planning fees.
gAagn \USERfee.CD
�,' •.w
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SERVICE CHARGES
Estimated
Annual 1 -1 -92 7 -1 -93 1 -1 -95
Volume Fee Fee Fee
PLANNING FEES (Set by Ordinance):
Zone Change
1
X285*
X342*
X410*
Conditional Use Permit:
R1 and R2
1
185*
183*
188*
Other
11
185*
295*
404*
Conditional Use Permit Revision:
Rl and R2
1
57*
37*
38*
Other
2
57*
75*
93*
Variances:
Rl and R2
7
57*
68*
82*
Other
5
85*
219*
352*
Vacations:
R1 and R2
10
60*
72*
86*
Other
2
60*
149*
238*
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created):
R1 and R2
11
40
48
58
Other
1
40
86
131
Home Occupations:
Initial
2
53
72
92
Renewal
5
22
23
46
Sign Erection Permit
100
16 -145
18
19
Billboard Erection Permit
1
14
73
75
Each Additional Sq. Ft.
62C
N/A
N/A
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
3
285*
429*
573*
Code Amendment
1
185
219
352
Planned Unit Development
1
340*
494*
648*
Preliminary Plat
7
340
520
700
Plus a surcharge for each affected property to pay for the County's filing fee for resolutions
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SERVICE CHARGES
Esfimated
Annual 1 4-92 7 -1 -93 1 -1 -95
Volume Fee .Fee Fee
Preliminary Plat Revision or Time
9
57
85
113
Extension
Final Plat
S
57
113
169
Time Extensions /Renewals
9
57
85
113
Billboard License
1
270
281
289
LICENSES DUE JANUARY ST
Motels:
1- 15 Units
1
60
72
87
16 - 35 Units
2
95
115
118
36 -100 Units
1
145
174
209
Over 100 Units
2
180
216
250
Special Food Handling Establishment
35
57
70
72
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGE
Woodlot Alteration Permit
1
60
12
12
Building Relocation
5
145
260
375
Moving Permit
3
80
42
43
Community Design Review Board:
R1 & R2
2
115
138
151
Other
16
115
213
311
Demolition Permit
1
40
49
50
Mobile Home Permit
1
50
31
32
On -Site Sewage Systems
6
15
24
33
PUBLICATIONS (Includes Sales Tax):
Zoning Code
11
5
5
Platting Code
6
2
2
L. Sign Code
4
2
2
�1"
Exhibit A
Page 3 of 3
COMaIMTYDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SERVICE CHARGES
Estimated
Annual 1 -1 -92
7 -1 7 93
1 -1 -95
Volume Fee
Fee
Fee
Comprehensive Plan
12
12
12
Zoning Map
5 `
2
2
NWWNWA
City Map
5
2
2
.Section Map
5
2
2
Planning Commission or Community
Design Review Board:
Minutes -Per Year
10
13
13
Agenda Packet -Per Year
100
88
91
Property Owner List
40
50
52
QAAGNIAGNIUSERFEE.CD
a
Exhibit 6
a
R
ORDINANCE N0,
PLANNING FEES
Section 1. Section 36 -26 of the Zoning Code of the City of Maplewood is hereby amended as. follows:
Section 36 -26. Fees. The following nonrefundable application fees shall be required:
Zone Change
$410
Conditional Use Permit:
R1 & R2
188
Other
404
Conditional Use Permit Revision:
R1 and R2
38
Other
93
Variances:
R1 and R2
82
Other
352
Vacations:
R 1 and R2
86
Other
238
Lot Divisions (Fee per lot created):
R1 and R2
58
Other
131
Home Occupation Permit
92 (initial permit)
46 (annual renewal)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
573
Code Amendment
352
Planned Unit Development
648
Preliminary Plat
700
Preliminary Plat Revision or Time Extension
113
Final Plat
169
Time Extensions /Renewals
113
Section 2. Section 36 -258 of the sign code is amended as follows:
Section 36 -258. Fees.
0 ) A sign erection permit fee (except for billboards) shall be $19.
(2) The fee for erection of billboards shall be $75.
(3) The annual license fee for billboards shall be $289.
Section 3. This ordinance shall betake effect on passage.
Passed by the Maplewood City Council on
Mayor
Attest:
r
Clerk
Ayes- -
Nayes--
G -6
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
City Manager
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
Sign Size Variance
Maplewood 11 Movies Pylon Sign
1793 Beam Avenue
A by Council I.
SUBJECT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
DATE:
November 10, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Endorsed
Modifie .�...�.�...
Rej ected
Date
Ben Lindberg is requesting a 34- square -foot sign size variance for United Artists Theaters. Mr.
Lindberg is representing Leroy Signs, Inc. He is proposing this sign expansion for the
Maplewood II movie theater at 1793 Beam Avenue. (See the location and property line maps on
pages )
a e Mr. Lindberg is proposing to add one -foot, ten- inches of sign height to the
. s 5 and 6.
existing pylon sign. The proposed addition would increase the sign's area from 286 square feet
to 334 square feet. This is an addition of 48 square feet. The City Code allows a maximum of
300 square feet. (See the proposed sign drawing on page 7.)
BACKGROUND
On September 23, 1980, the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) approved the design
plans for this theater. Condition 13 required compliance with the sign ordinance.
DISCUSSION
There is no justification for this variance. State law requires that, to grant a variance, the City
Council must find that strict enforcement would cause United Artists "undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property." There are no such circumstances here. The applicant
q
simply wants more sign area than the Code allows. The applicant has stated in his letter that "the
reason for this size increase is to display a larger letter size to identify this facility to the
automobile traffic on Beam Avenue." (See the applicant's letter on page 9.)
It is true that the "United Artists - Maplewood II" sign copy cannot be read as easily as one gets
further away from the sign. However, this is true of all signs. The applicant could enlarge the
sign height by six inches to et the maximum area allowed and expand the sign copy within this
g g
panel or he could redesign the panel to use all of the blank space. These options would not need
a variance. The a pp g easily -read has large easil -read wall - mounted signs on the theater. These clearly
identify the theater as a United Artists theater from distances where the copy on the pylon sign is
hard to read. In 1993, United Artists put up their sign for the Maplewood I movie theater. This
sign advertises six screens and is only 173 square feet. (See the drawing on page 8.)
RECOMMENDATION
Deny the request for a 34- square -foot sign size variance for the. Maplewood II United Artists
theater at 1793 Beam Avenue, on the basis that:
1. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the property under consideration. The applicant's sign copy
dilemma is due to the sign's design and not due to unique circumstances with the property.
2. The United Artists sign for Maplewood I movie theater, advertises six screens and is only
173 square feet.
3. The applicant could enlarge the sign copy and stay within the size limits required by the
Code.
2
REFERENCE .INFORMATION
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site size: 4.41 acres
Existing land use: Maplewood H Movie Theater
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North. Maplewood Mall
South: Beam Avenue and Chili's Restaurant
West: Southlawn Drive and the alive Garden Restaurant
East: Maplewood Mall parking lot
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: BC (business and commercial)
Zoning: BC (business commercial)
ordinance requirements
Section 36- 351(2) allows the maximum area of a freestanding sign of 300 square feet if the lot
size exceeds one acre.
Findings for Variance Approval
State law requires that the City Council make the following findings to approve a variance from
the zoning code
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in granting a variance, means the property in question cannot be put
to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the
landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and the
variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the
terms of the ordinance.
3
p:sec2n/movies. var
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Sign Sketch Maplewood II Theater
4. Sign Sketch. - Maplewood I Theater
5. Applicant's letter dated September 21, 1994
ATTACHMENT 1
11�r41S
HE]GHTS 1A
Wool&
• • r •• •• •• • • • •• • �.• y •••••• ••. • ,•
-COUNTY ROAD 0
COUNTY RD. D
O WiOODLYNN
O 9 W z
° d r Sr p �
3 X p0 LYDIA a
4. S p: 1. . .
W
Z
2. 1. SUMMIT. CT. 3 ao
2. COUNTRYVIEW CIR. s'7• 4 v N
.,. 3. 3. DULUTH CT. e�V ✓p Y o
G ..t c 4. LYDIA ST. �n p S O z
� to � �
19 SEAM ® AVE. BEAM 'Ps
19 19 � .
MAPLE
g
OWN-
it AV lb
z hl��p aT JR"SEY • .
W COUNTY
= COURT
KOHLMAN AVE KOHL MAN "
z
►iee W AVE.
1NTY ROAD C W
>
To ® '•
z ,
Cr
+i W
o •
O
W � rEHILL R0.
CO A OR U • '• -ftj
�. � � " oEMONT AVE. • • J .
o BROOKS AVE. BROOKS , L •.. • a
AVE. EL *&, - . ..
SEX TANT z f,,,; • .
AVE.
GERV A VE. GERVAIS 41 iE
d Loki
> c� GERVAIS GERVAIS AVE.
a - AVE.
-
.. •
� CT. •. - .
Y
=n= ,L V IKING DR.
❑
Ate' '
SHERREN AVE. CASTLE AVE. Kn _ Qr t': • '� '
0 COPE AVE COPE AVE. 1O
J LARK CT. AVE. CJ �n LARK AVE* a ..
•
4 t s t; to LAURIE . RD. CIO. RD. ... I c�/ % •% �o�c on .._�_. _ tat iptC 0_ ern / .n I !=
LOCATION MAP
4
N
• 5
7.
or t•rj�-
+ to
0 ;� �4
0
444
g d
ou %o
cn 0
LOT-7 BL K-
40 o °`
MAPLEWOOD MALL
-McDONALDS
To TA L . : 40. 4c
14.
B.0 (0
a.�9'�c -- j •
AJJ
B
s e9
300 2
J (3
oink � 9
o t .
In 0 l aw
LQ l'- 8 L K:-
cn
..... ......
. .... UNITED ARTISTS THEATRE
...... ........
.. ... .
OLIVE GARDEN SCLO 4
243.4 ?p 40 lbo
Aq v. No •
PYLON SIGN
Doc. No. 1814 0
41 0'
�la 160 ORE/to" '
�
— 46w
ev) V.
-71.
W)m ® 6.
AV E co
-04- a rn r . A p I
I" Awwo LOW
'0 0" Doc 6
%p
-434.7 3 631 & , rft4o;k IE lr^KCW from SCA
M AVC. I CT FILIE 3` 8-1-11
too' too* 100 too 100 lo I C) 0, 0*
280 CHILIS 6LINIC MT
-�20 MEDICAL
<'17.) '76 ac. .84 ac 2.2 Qom.
3 3 0000'
4103
0
0 9 cl. C., .
'0
. r
• -WWI
M.. 0
0
Co.
o
Ro AEJO
+
(3)
qiD N t�
OWN
"a t o 4 Lp jj � a. 70
RENEW RENEW
( �p o
iB I lq6l sn � 2 0)
PROPERTY LINE I ZONING MAP
6
EXISTING
ATTACHMENT 3
3 1
bo
PROPOSED SIGN -WITH
1 FOOT, 10 INCHES OF
ADDITIONAL HEIGHT
L1j
CL
r -i
f
1:5
1
: - j
CL
LL
. 11
Z;l
L LIP
I I
00
LA�
ni
�71
re') '
f NJ ��Ip. DOUBLE FACE DISPLAY T-12 ILLUMINATION
P1 r1A PC.� N/o o p 1 7NCA
canno[ be'eProduced either in vvhole or ire part %m their written consent
-iesjQn is the exclusive propemf of cordon Si Company anu
MIEN'r.-
twatmp
MTtew4vp X_
ADORM
P4
DATE
ScNk
DRAWN BY.
SALE7EMON:
T4evctNN
NNNI
C'")
m
Gordon-4
g ri� qm MZ 4.%
MO Avw 9iih Avenue
DRAWNG NUMBER
.-E
1/e* THICK ALUMINIUM FACES
ROUT COPY AND LOGO OUT OF BACKGROUND
.(OVERLAY WHrTE PLEX. W GOLD PERFORAT ED
'
ALUMINILW AND BACK UP- POUT
PAINT FACES POLYURETHANE
SAniq FINI MACK
OVERLA Y 14EVEALS WITH BRIGHT GOLD ALUMINIUM
A:
WHITE POLYCAR80NATE FACES
WffX ZIP-CHANGE COPY
B
le,"Ie 4orr
—�
=
�r,
m
C
v� r�,,�-� z�- •► V-5 •
ALUMINIUM CAMNET WITM ROLED ALUMINUM ENDS
FINISH
PAINT SATIN POLYUSET)iANE BLACK
DIVIDER BAR. • PAI WMrrE
SEE DRAWING m 2=7-326A FOA
DETAILS
OVERLAY REVEALS WrTH BAtGHT GOLD ALUMiNjum
FABRICATED ALUMINIIJM BASE WTTH
ROLLED ALUMINIUM ENOS
PAINT POLYURETHANE SATM FINISH SLACK
0, t li p
O 111,11114
1
re') '
f NJ ��Ip. DOUBLE FACE DISPLAY T-12 ILLUMINATION
P1 r1A PC.� N/o o p 1 7NCA
canno[ be'eProduced either in vvhole or ire part %m their written consent
-iesjQn is the exclusive propemf of cordon Si Company anu
MIEN'r.-
twatmp
MTtew4vp X_
ADORM
P4
DATE
ScNk
DRAWN BY.
SALE7EMON:
T4evctNN
NNNI
C'")
m
Gordon-4
g ri� qm MZ 4.%
MO Avw 9iih Avenue
DRAWNG NUMBER
V
0
L
LL
w�
mow
y
R!
a
c
0
LM
U.
a�
0
a.
a�
a.
0
C
U 0
a�
0
0.
4) o
c a�
a�
C/) Q
c
0 E
o
Z U
C t5
o
0
Z
a�
0
aD
0
aD
m
a�
'O
0
c�
m
U
September 21, 1994
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road "B"
Maplewood, MN 55109
Attn: Geoff Olson,
Di of Community Development
United Artists
RE: Maplewood II
1793 Beam Avenue
Maplewood, NAT
Dear Mr. Olson:
Please accept this letter as a request by Gordon S' ign Co, and Lero
Signs, Inc. for a variance to increase the size of the Maplewood II
Theatre pylon sign.
We propose to increase the size of the top cabinet from 2 x 26
to 4'6'' x 26'0 "; thereby increasing the size of the -ion si
e f pY sign from, feet to 334 square feet. The sign code allows a '
286
of 300 square feet so, in effect, we are asking for an additional
34 square feet.
The reason for this increase in size is to display a larger letter
size to identify his facility g
y ty to the automobile traffic on Beam
Avenue. The existing top sign cabinet does not have enough hei ght
to accomplish this.
The photo survey I have included will show that the "United Artists"
letters cannot be read from 300 200 or even 100 In fact you
would be almost passing the sign before y
� g gn o e you are able to identify the
name of this Theatre.
We believe this slight increase in size would not alter the essential
character of the area and because we will maintain the same co
lighting and confi ation it shoul p i r 0'
� d be s.n keeping with the spirit
and intent of the ordinance.
Respectfully,
Ben Li.ndbery
cc: Steve Youle
V
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD, :MINNESOTA
NOVEMBER 22,1994
L CALL TO ORDER
Erickson called the meefi
IL ROLLNCALL
Marvin Erickson Present
Bruce Thompso Present
Marie Robinson Absent
Roger Anitzberger Present
Ananth Vidyashankar Present
II1. APPROVAL OF MINU
There were no minutes.
f
1V. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Boardmember Thopson moved approval of
O
Boardmembe Anitzberger seconded.
f�
r 1
! ` e
y ..
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
VI. DESIGN REVIEW
agenda as submitted.
s —all
A. Sign Size Variance— Maplewood II Movies, 1793 Beam Avenue
Steve Eull of Gordon Sign Company (Denver), the national sign contractor for United
Artists, said United Artists has an ongoing, nationwide program of buildin g and
renovating theaters. This includes updating the signs with a new starburst logo which
requires taller letters (a 3:1 ratio) and, therefore, a bigger top on the sign. Mr. Eull
also said the letters on the building are not very visible and create a hardshi p in
identifying the theater. Tim Hinsen, the district manager for United Artists,
commented on the various changes in movie theaters and how the new si
complemented the local upgrading. Some Board members felt particular movies
attracted consumers, not the theater name.
E
U
Community Design Review Board
Minutes of 11 -22 -94
-2-
Boardmember Thompson moved the Community De '
, ty gn Review Board recommend
denial of request for a 34- square -foot sign variance f •
f the gn or the Maplewood II United
Artists theater at 1793 Beam Avenue, on the basis that:
1. Strict enforcement of the ordinance would not cause undue hardship because of
.circumstances unique to the property under consideration. The applicant's sign
copy dilemma is due to the sign's design and not due to unique circumstances
with the property.
2. The United Artists sign for Maplewood I movie theater '
P ter advertises six screens
and is only 173 square feet.
3. The applicant could enlarge the sign co and s •
PY y wlthui the size limits
required by the Code.
Boardmember Anitzberger seconded. Ayes—all
B. wilding Addition -- Edgerton Elementary hool 192
t<�ry 9 Edgerton Street
Diana Bellgowan and Dick Daniels, of RSP Architects explained the reasons r the
the plans and described the changes. Mr. Daniels said d the ' t
scho distric
was recei ' g funds from the City of Maplewood and would use
the m 1n
artnershi � p p the school. Ms. Bellgowan also said the would u�i�g a Y clay -like,
8- by 16 -inch structural brick that would closely atch the '
Y e tang back and all of
the windows in theuilding will also be re laced. There '
• �,, P ouid be one piece of roof-
top equipment over the cafeteria area.
Commissioner Thompson n6ved the Comm�ity Design Review Board recommend:
D. Approval of the plans stazn d gust 29 for the Edgerton Elementary
School expansion. The folio conditions apply:
1 • This approvals ersedes the evious plan approval of March 28, 1994.
2. Repeat 's review in two years if City has not issued a building permit
for 'project.
3. /Submit the following for staff approval b f e the City issues a building
permit:
a. A revised site plan showing the following:
(1) Striping for ninety- degree parking east of thus striping.
General. Government - Charitable Gambling: Eliminate four proposed objectives and replace with
"Timely review of requests for funding under the policies established by the Council."
General Government - Emergency Management: Amend Objective 1. to read "Disseminate public
information on Emergency Management issues in Maplewood in Motion cable TV, local
9 Y 9
newsp and radio." Amend Objective 6. to read "Conduct semi annual #5 exercises for City
Hal 1, Publ Works and Community Center staff."
General Government - Legal: Add an objective that states "Timely review of. bond applications by
bond counsel."
Parks & Recreation - Community Center: Amend Objective 9. to read "By April 1, 1995, establish a
cleaning re air , P prog and replacement ram that maintains the appearance of the Community Center."
9
Parks & Recreation - Nature Center: Add following objective: "Develop pl for how open space
can be integrated into Natu Center function/programs."
Public Safety - Administration: Add an objective that reads "Prepare and distribute quarterly reports
of crime analysis to City Council." Add an objective that reads "Prepare a job description for the new
position of administrative assistant."
Public Works - Street Maintenance: Amend Objective 3 to read "Complete a neighborhood street
b August 15 1995." Add an objective to read "Co
overlay p Y ntinue snow removal of 9 � objective
sidewalks and intersections on White Bear Avenue as t ime permits. "
Public Works - Vehicle & Eq uipment Maintenance: Add an objective that reads "Research the
ossibilit: of maintaining ambulances, fire trucks and police squads by City employees."
P Y
Finance Director Faust p resented the Debt Service section of the proposed 1995 Budget. He stated
th at due to the Open Space bonds, the total tax levy is a 6.9% increase rather than a 1.5% increase.
E. AMBULANCE RATES FOR 1995
Following some discussion, Mayor Bastian moved that Resolution No. 94 -09 -1.00 be adopted as
resented. The motion was seconded by Counciimember Koppen and was approved.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING 1995 AMBULANCE RATES
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorised to impose reasonable charges for
emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws
(Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and
WHEREAS, the paramedic ambulance services are partly financed by property taxes; and
WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge non - residents a higher rate than residents for
services rendered; and
WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the
distance a erson is transported and by type of services provided; i.e., basic or advanced life support
p P
services as defined by Medicare.
2
KOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges shall be effective
January 1, 1995:
Residents Non - Residents
Base rates:
Basic ambulance services $240 $265.
Advanced life support ambulance services $465 $510
Rate per mile transported $7.10 $7.70
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge for services rendered
when the atient is not transported, when the patient is transported to the detoxification center, or
p p P p
when the patient is transported in a squad car.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if more than one person is transported, the
ambulance charges will be pro -rated between the people transported.
Ayes.: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen
Nays: Rossbach
F. ORDINANCE TO SET RECYCLING RATES FOR 1995 (First Readin4l
There was some discussion about the costs associated with the recycling cent near th Public
Works building. It was the consensus of the Council that a report about the costs should be
presented to them at the end of 1994. At than time, a program of quarterly clean -up days will be
comp ared recy cling p ared to the rec clin center ro ram. Mayor Ba stian moved that first readin of_Qrdinan+ce No.
724b . e a roved to increase. the recy cling charge, effective 1 -1 -95. The motion was seconded by
Cou incilmember Koppen and was approved.
ORDINANCE N0. 724
PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE. MAPLEWOOD CODE FOR WASTE
MANAGEMENT AND RECYCLING CHARGES
The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. Sec. 16 -58 is hereby amended to read as follows: AN residential property shall be
billed $3.05 per unit per quarter for solid waste reduction and recycling.
Section 2. This ordin�. a shall take effect January 1, 1995.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3
Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen
Nays Rossbach
G. BUDGET POLICY FOR COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS FUND
City Manager McGuire .explained that the proposed policy allows the Community Center to operate
with a "bottom line" philosophy. The total revenue and expenditures are not important. What is
important is the net income. Mayor Bastian indicated that the resolution be revised to include a
.provision that the Community Center income statement be placed on the Council agenda quarterly
for discussion. Following some discussion, Mayor Bastian moved that revised Resolution No..94 -09-
101 be adopted to formalize this Community Center operations policy and ado tan initial net income
budget for 1994. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and was approved.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET POLICIES FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER
OPERATIONS - AND ADOPTION OF INITIAL 1994 BUDGET
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Maplewood to operate the Community Center as a
business, and
WHEREAS, it is important that management have the flexibility to incur expenses as needed
so that customers can be properly served, and
WHEREAS, the Finance Department will prepare and distribute a monthly income statement
to monitor the financial transactions for the Community Center operations.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the annual budget for the Community Center
Operations Fund consist solely of a planned net income amount, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Center income statement be placed on the
Council agenda quarterly for discussion, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City management staff shall have the flexibility to incur
expenses as needed so that customers can be properly served, and
SE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the budgeted 1994 net income for the Community Center
Operations fund be set at $15,810.
Ayes: All
H. INSURANCE FOR OPEN MEETING LAW
Mayor Bastian moved that the insurance coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust for open meeting law defense costs be obtained for the estimated premium .cost of $1.600.
The motion was seconded by C.ouncilmember Koppen and was approved.
Ayes: All
EAJ
SELECTION OF DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1995 BUDGET AND
EROPERTYTAXES
After reviewing the schedule, Mayor Bastian moved that a) the initial hearing be scheduled for 7:00
m. on Tuesday November 29: b the continuation hearing needed be scheduled for 5:00 .m.
on Frida December 9• and c the final hearing to ado t the tax levy and budget be scheduled for
Z:00.2.m. Monday, December 12. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Carlson and was
approved.
Ayes: All
J 9 ADOPTION OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX - LEVY PAYABLE IN 1995
Mayor Bastian - moved that Resolution No. 94 -09 -102 be adopted which gives areliminary approval to
the proposed tax levy for 1 payable in 1 995 in the amount of $8,572,900 for
HACA. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and was approved.
.RESOLUTION PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED TAX LEVY
FOR 1994 PAYABLE IN 1995
WHEREAS, State law requires that the City Council give preliminary approval of a proposed
tax levy for 1994 payable in 1995 by September 15, 1994, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Proposed 1995 Budget and has determined the
amount of the proposed tax Levy payable in 1995 which is the maximum amount that will be levied,
P P
and
WHEREAS, the proposed property tax levy certified must be after the deduction of the
homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA), and
WHEREAS, the 1995 HACA for the City of Maplewood is $1,593,415.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THAT the proposed tax Levy for 1994 payable in 1995 in the amount of
$8,572,900 less $1,593,415 for HACA is hereby given preliminary approval.
Ayes: All
K. OTHER BUSINESS
Several Councilmembers stated that they liked the new budget format using department objectives.
L. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
5
6e ow P/
AGENDA REPORT
ti on by Counoll Y#1
To: City Manager Michael McGuire �� Uvdified,..,,,,,,,,.
• Coll i n s`"�C�
From: Director of Pu blic c Safety Kenneth V Re6jecte
J Application plication For Liquor License - Michael Gengler Date
P
Date: December 6, 1994
Introduction
Michael Gengler has applied for an intoxicating liquor license for 2999 N.
Highway 61 (Gulden's).
Background
An extensive background investigation has been done on Mr. Gengler. He has no
known contacts with the police, and we cannot find any evidence that he holds
a liquor license in any other establishment in the State of Minnesota.
Recommendation
After conducting n a thorough background investigation on ' th i s individual and
Af g g
havin g a discussion with him, I do not find any reason to deny his application
for an intoxicating liquor license. -
Action Requ i red
Application for intoxicating liquor license to be submitted to the City
Council for their review and approval or denial.
KVC: i s
cc City Clerk
Liquor File
94- 018048
sere OF MAPLEWOOD 7o z CIO
Af 7
A.4 G ICI Q UOR 110ENSE
�1.P FUCAMON FOR INTOXICAM
WO A"UCA'"ON SJUU BE MM=D IN DUFUCATE, please do not use initials,
77 Wbwvu A&D I mm Ug l y and vgful falsify the =Me% to the Wowing Vationnif e Ahmm'be
'i � Id PDty Cd PWIW7 10d " be
h &wvLrjz the foaa q j;�wuow • 0A"UCANn" ALI be g overned as feMovs: For a Cor. pun3abed ly.
ration gm am A " ffimji
& execute application for &I t. diredws and stockholders. For &,p&rt.
f 7&mWp set of &t o"PUCAM" momte this sppUcaSoz for a members of the. partnership. OC 1 b 1994
.,�,,, EMY CUESTION MUST 11E ANSWERED
r ,.
VC0 D -mmmm"
a"Vidual .WW, WUW w P &nwr )
L
jw and is bdj
I-w4b apply for as We latoxicaUa U Ucme to Imated at
J"
9L-
66
• in the City of
(Give ad&vu AM k dmeripuft)
Naple Count of Rm r State ce Xi-qnnmt4 fm accordance with the provision: of Ordinance No.
95 of mapIrwood.
Z. Cfw* applicants' date of WM:
Q
(Day) CYO&)
S. The midezee for sub of the applicants &=*a berek for the past live y ears Is as Mows:
Aw �w .� Z7�� .
4- 12 the 0011=t & VftheZ Of the V33tSd fttn c?
2f maluraNted state date tad place of sal stim
If a awwstka w Pwtbv%*h* state Sam Mp bo*Xne naturalization of amb officer or partner.
. -- ('S A -
"MUS Oil application Oa gfvt wife's w husband's foil name and addms......
Lav &MIJ=! as ociatet b thk applitation Mow td for the past live rears?
�`dGlBo�!8
i
C�/
' T '
Z. If parlaV%WP. State MM, sad addmu it ad parer 701 n
If a eozpWatioa, data o[ state In
• which L' - ��.�..�� ri✓ atooaat of &vtIk WbOSd a pi tyisa ti on
watt of paid to Ow
!f a subsidiary of ash sCW w U w Mb id
. give Parpoos of M tLM
e and addrou ��c. dbwtm and •taclLholders and the number of &hares held by sub:
J
( NAM) µdd..s l (City .
o
If hcorporated under the bws of another state. is aorperstion a:ithorhed to do bus3aus h this
State± Humber of "rU Scate of aatbority
If the applicA h for a am Corporation, belvde a eerMed copy of ArUcles of Incorporation and
�yIsws.
_. On what !Soar is tit �a t jotatad, of !o be 3ocated ± S � some
!. If operstint under a soniny wdin nr, bow k Lbe latiw of the boDdint elassilied ?
Is the I*Ddinj located within the prescribed arra for such ticease?
lo. 1s the establishment located near an amemy, aTSese, safirtss3t7, ebvnh, trade or b3yh &shoal ?
. _ State the approximate distance of the utablithment from such Scboo►1 w Chu
Ii. State "me sad &""at of Oww of Wdiat .
bw w of bvDdiAg any eoaawtim dirwUy or In-
IL An the Uxw as the above
Se13aQvo t?
I=. State whether or nay sd Uk assorhw .h was spp?icatlm j"We ever had an application
!oy a Uqua I.kense jjjwW by say seaak3pility or Slate avthwIty; if ao, S'ive date and details
END
IL RAS the agp&Mt, or any of his w"ciatu t this slr U atke, duriat the live years knmodiately
this aMU"tim ever W a IicsO oader the Winawata Ugvor Coatrol Act revoked for
my Twaton of web Lws er Ioea1 erdiaaaees; If so, =fvt date and detaSl AO
A d n-. i nif s 1. r • w 0 0
183 � L. '' - � . .• .,
Maplewced, 55
i
I& State whether applicant, oe say at his associates b this appli ation, during that put ive years
west evet ooavicts+d od lay IAgvar Lw T$*Uthons or 107 aim is this state, or aay other state, or
ender Fidcrat Lws, lad if so# give date lad dttails AO
X b applicant, or any of his asswislas to lh,is spplication, a member of the governs body of the
aona3dpality fa wb3rb this Dense is to be issued? If so, in what capacity?
37. Mate wheller any persor, other than applicants has any right, title or interest is the furniture,
Axturrs, or equipment is the prWisss for which b'cense i& applied, an if 50, give 3UM2s and detWIs
AMkA
5a
A1.1
1�• c , s� +�.. .
It. Nave applicants any interest whatsoever, directly or bdirectly, in any other liquor establishment
b the State of Minnesota? . Give time and Address of such establishmen
IL Furnkh the names and Addresses of at least three business references, including one bank refer -
L
C100 v
G
!0. Do you possess a retail dealer'& fdcnti&Ation ear+d issued by the Liquor Control Commissioner
*h3ch wM expire December list of this year? Give slumber of lam 17
21. Does applicant fotcnt U w3l iAtvzimUhr liquor to other than the consumer ? - 'r d
22 State vNether app&art 16tm& 1+o paesees, eperatA oe permit the possession or tion of, on
the &Z'sa premises ar in any room, adjoining the licensed premises, any riot machine, dice, gam.
�tiag
610" Abd apperatvt, er permit any gambling tb eren - %r\ n .
St. Are the premises tow caeupied, w la be empied, by tbs aWicaai entirOy separate and exclusive
Arum any DOW business establkhmmt?
Q�
24. Stag trade Warne to bt *A@d r-,. �l , , ���., .1� �► , �� rt, .,
36. State "me of parson that WM operate
26. Give Federal Retail Uquor DrrWs TU Stamp Nvmber
i
aale NOesSe k bofat aMLW for, do you fatsnd to diver Iiquor by nhWe! . .._ Ii so,
state aambv id motor vAkh pe uits iesnad by Liquor Control oaer for w7nt Yaar
!s. If rw are bc.Ddint a w for the for wbkh " applIcat;on Is balut muds, phase
submit plans and apetMuthw with this apptieat3ao.
29. Mucial of the eaftetke of Shia bofldiaj W9 be 0 follows:
S0. ftMIA a personal lirAACW stLtMUt W ft Sit applkatioa. If a parbenhip, furnisb financial State-
Out of awl parties.
=l. Cive description of type of opamtioo If tbis is as oa -tile Scams* application (LL whether cock-
tail lounge, site club, nwlaumt at& spocityiay UPadty by amber of customers and any other
pertinent data) to v . • C7 -,e
AIA -.
l.2. R'hii yreti Sous exPeAvea Mve you Ud iz,' the operation of the tn* of business described bn the
answer to Ne. 81 above /- } a ; C•✓�� k
SS. Appl ;cant, and his associates in this application, wo &trimly ,comply with all the I w& of the State
ad XNA- Oia = -timing tk Uxttiaa snd the Oak of ie+taslcatint liquor; rules and regulations
proM3rate6 t3V the liquor Coatrd Ommissioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and
hvvtr et rUly that I have read five forte questiaw and that the answ en to acid Quastions
M true of sr, own know ledge.
0 ,� / , z,/ _Z, -
Mubscrlbed and swora to before ww thin t at A »IksatI
b of
THIS APPUCATION MUST BE ACC*MPANIED IMTH YOUR CHECK
POR THE FIRST LICENSE PERIOD,
Maplewocd, JOAN' 55109
CITI OF MAPLEWOOD
.1830 E. County Road 8
Maplevood, Minnesota 55109
APM CATION FOR
SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE
doing business at T goaJ yyuys t5h�-
C t . "a under the business name of
,hereby make application for a
license to sell liquor between the hours of 10:00 A.M. and 12:00 midnight on Sundays
at the above location.
I hereby certify that meals are served, and will be served on Sundays, at this location,
-that . there is table seating capacity for 30 or more persons at - one time, and that I
presently hold on- sale liquor license, issued by the City of Maplewood.
Signed,
w xc;�,.� � --
Signature. o A d.cant '
Ad d r
Thy seating rapacity at the above is
Date: L —
License Fee is $200.00 per year. (License year is from January 1, through December '31 )
LICENSE FEE PAID
RECEIPT N0. •
LICENSE N0.
i
P A
kov
�, � --�� � � � U Q. � � � h am• � _.._.
s R �
V
GJ 4 C .-I t
1 ;
i!
' 1 1
Z-0 44�-.w
M 114AAru
k
s;
r'
i�
i .
i
L
t '
}
L
F
i
i•
3 ;
!t
t !
t
}
i
i
,
v.
Personal Financial St atement
�
MidLAmerica Bank
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AT THE BANK
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
COMPLETION OF THIS FORM
YOU MAY APPLY FOR A CREDIT EXTENSION OR FINANCIAL ACCOMMODATION INDIVIDUALLY OR
JOINTLY WITH A CO- APPLICANT. THIS STATEMENT AND ANY APPLICABLE SUPPORTING SCHED-
ULES`'MAY BE COMPLETED JOINTLY BY BOTH MARRIED AND UNMARRIED CO- APPLICANTS IF THEIR
ASSETS AND LIABILITIES ARE SUFFICIENTLY JOINED SO THAT THE STATEMENT CAN BE MEANING-
FULLY AND FAIRLY P R ESE NTED O N A C BASIS; OTHERWISE SEPARATE STATEMENTS AND
SCHEDULES ARE REQUIRED.
APPLICANT
NAME "t G�lQ�2.� � • 1�2f1C1,er Social Security if
ADDRESS ng
TELEPHONE NUMBER' ��I'( — S� — I� DATE OF BIRTH 2 -5 �
PRESENT EMPLOYER .�hv..,��'15� utL d� �Uuk POSITION
ADDRESS � Ct �V t,`���(� YV \'z�It.►.c`u�� .� Vy ` 05
CO- APPLICANT
NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NUMBER DATE OF BIRTH________
PRESENT EMPLOYER POSITION
Social Security #t
ADDRESS
Have you. ever gce through bankruptcy or had a judgment
against you?
Are any assets pledged or debts secured except as shown?
Have you made a wi II?
Number of Dependents
(If --None- check None)
Marital Statu (answer only if this financial statement
is provided in connection with a request for secured
credit or applicant is seeking a joint account with
spouse.)
APPLICANT
� Yes �:e�4 0
C Yes E200�0
�es [� No
i
C None
CO- APPLICANT
C Yes 0 No
Yes Lj No
� Yes ONo
None
F�4arried , Married
Separated Separated
Unmarried [J Unmarried
(Unmarried includes single, divorced, widowed)
The foregoing statement, submitted for the purpose of obtaining credit, is true and corre;;? n :vex detail and fair;y show,
my /our financial condition at the time indicated. I /we will give you prompt written notice of any subsequent sLbstar:tial change
in such financial condition occurring before discharge of my /our obligations to you. I.'we understand that you will retain this
personal financial statement whether,: or not you approve the credit in connection with which t is submitted. You are authorized
to check my /our credit and employment history or any other information contained n.
THE UNDERSIGNED C ERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS FORM
HAS BEEN CAREFULLY REVIEWED AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT -Ire ALL RESPECTS.
Date Your Signature
Date Co- Applicant Signature (if you are requesting the financial
accommodation jointly)
Work History
Michael P. Gengler
.205 East Viking Dr.
Vttfe Canada MN,, 55117
Professional ojective:
Create a quality, service oriented profitable, upscale supper club,
based on team efforts .between staff and guests.
Education:
Graduate of Columbia Heights High School Class of 1977.
Ex per ience :
19741977 Br,= dcama.ns. Columbia Heights, MN
Dishwasher, Cook, Make Table, Sales Person, Manager,
978 - i 980 Anthony's wharf St, Anthony ,Main Mols MN
Head Night Chef, supervised nightly specials, pre - prepared nightly menu specials,
h expediter in kitchen of four cooks.
197% The Ground Round, Brooklvn Center, MN.
Kitchen Manager, supervised food costs, kitchen help, and ordered product for store.
Worked as second job while at Anthony's Wharf.
1980 - 1985 The Ground Round, Richfield, MN_.
Opened kitchen as kitchen manager, moved to bartender and later was bar manager.
T his restaurant was the highest grossing Ground Round in the nation. Annual sales were
o•,rt= "2 000,Q'� during the first year of business.
1985 -1987 Filbert's. Bandana aQuare, St. Paul MN
First serer+ months worked as Assistant Manager, then promoted to General Manager.
Totally in charge of establishment, food, liquor, and marketing. Broke all sales records
under my leadership.
1987 -1990 The Ground Round. N. St. _Paul. MN
Was recruited from Filberts as General Manager in a losing operation and succeeded in a
fnancial turn- around. The store was on the corporate disposal list, but was removed from
the list on January 1, 1989. Had achieved 11 % sales increases each year following 7 years
of declining sales and losses. This store broke all historical sales records including
opening week of 1980.
1990 to present: Gulden's Roadhouse lnc, Maplewood. !1rlN
General Manager, totally in charge of establishment, including all budgeting, marketing,
food, and liquor.
T11
ODf
Western Surety Company
1
LICENSE AND PERMIT BOND
For County, City, Town or Village Only -Not Valid for Bonds Required by the State. Not Valid for Contract,
Performance, Maintenance, Subditision, Agent to Sell Hunting and Fishing Licenses or Utility Guarantee Bond.
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
BOND No. L &P 60409560
`
F That we, MICHAEL GANGLER DBA GULDEN' S ROADHOUSE t A
of the _ CITY of ST. PAUL MINNESOTA '
State of , as Principal.,
and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a Corporation duly licensed to do business in the
of MINNESOTA State
as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the
C ITY o MAPLEWOOD , State of MINNESOTA
,Obligee, in the amount
(Valid only when a County, City, Town or Village is named as Obligee)
of * *THREE THOUSAND AND N0/ 100 - - ---- r * *3 OOQ.00 * * ** DO LLARS,
NOT v (
( VA LID FOR MORE THAN $25,000)
• lawful money of the United States, to be ' paid to the said Obligee, for which a ent well p Ym and truly
to be made, we bind ourselves and our legal representatives, jointly and severall THE CONDITION OF THi .
y
• S OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That whereas, the Principal has been
licensed ON SALE LIQUOR
by the Obligee.
• NOW THEREFORE, if the Principal shall faithfully perform the duties and compl Y p p y vvith the laws and
ordinances (including all amendments), pertaining to the license or permit, then this obligation to be void
otherwise. . remain in full force and effect for a period commencing on V the 1st
day of
y
a . .
January J
195 , and ending on the 31st day
of 1 De c Pm e r , 19 unless renewed by continuation certificate.
�
::..:. .bond n18 �� be terminated a a • • •
....... y _ t an time by the Surety upon sending notice m writing to the Obligee and to
• be Principal, in pare of the Obligee or at such other address as the Surety eems reasonable and at h e
Y the xpira-
bon of :thirty -five (35)."days from the mailing f notice or as son •
g o thereafter as permitted by applicable law,
v�hichever is :later, this bond shall terminate and the Sure
t shall be relieved from an liability Y y 1 ability for any subsequent
acts or omissions of the Principal.
V Dated this 19th day of
19J 5
Countersi
By ;�;r
Reside ge om Casey
T .D .N' S ROADHOUSE
Principal
Michael Gan XTUR - LF---TY/ Principal
WESTER COMPANY
un
President
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF S ETY
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA (Corporate Officer)
County of Minnehaha ss r��
On this 19th day of October , 19_9 —5 , before me, the undersigned officer, personally
. � �P
appeared Joe P. Kirby , who acknowledged himself to be the aforesaid officer of WESTERN
SURETY COMPANY, a corporation, and that he as such officer, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing
g g
instrument for the
purpose therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation by himself as such officer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal.
♦ . . X76! .,►ic►c.:.G.:.:.i�:�:,.4Cy +
' c
S. BARNES , � ..044 h.A
a �1_, NOTARY PUBLIC S L :� Notar Public South Dakota
\Orw
SOUTH DAKOTA
My Commission Expires 1.22 - 99 Western Surety Company
Form 849 –1 1 -91 ' yy�,y4hv, '������:.;.:;.,� ,,� 1- 605 - 336 -0850
MEMORANDUM
-Actl on by Co
unci.1.0 , .,
TO: City Manager Endors
FRM: City Engineer and Director of Community D evelopment modifi e�
y e elopment
SUBJECT: Mapleleaf Estates��
DATE: December 6 1994 Da
INTRODUCTION
On November 14, 1994, the City Council tabled this ro'ect until December p .1 12, 1994. The
developer agreed to a time extension to give the City time to ne otiate for open ace.
g p p
Councilmembers had questions about drainage and street, access. The developer met with lth the
City Manager and Assistant City Manager. Before committing to a sale, the developer needs to
know what the City will approve for the east half of the site. He would like relimin plat
approval on the east half
p �'Y p
DRAINAGE
The City drainage plan and the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District lan for this area
P
show that the runoff from a majority of the site should flow to Kohlman Lake. These laps
p are
based on the topography and the availability of ponding areas to store water to control rates of
discharge to the lake. The plat conditions in the attached report require p q re that the developer
conduct a drainage study for this small area and design a system that is in compliance g Y p e with
the City and Watershed plans. This plan will include a pipe connection to the ondin area from
p g
the wetland on Cypress Street to the ponding area east of the park rop ert arrangement
. This arran
P p Y g
will result in less discharge of stormwater to the existing inadequate system g q y em on Cypress Street.
The drainage problem on Cypress Street should be somewhat less of a roble '
p m if the new pipe is
constructed as part of the plat.
STREET ACCESS
The City Code limits dead ends to 1,000 feet : unless there is no other option. To prevent a 1
. p p
foot dead end, the developer needs to use two of the followin g p six options for access to this site:
1. Cypress Street
2. Demont Avenue
3. The Drive -In Driveway
4. Gervais Avenue
5. Keller Parkway
6. Forest Street
1. Cypress Street
The developer is proposing a connection to Cypress Street. The only problem with this option is
Yp p
that the residents on this street complained about the increased traffic in front ,of their homes.
There are five homes that front on Cypress Street. The City may be able to reduce the
y y potential
traffic by buying part of the site for open space. Residents also complained that the increased
traffic would be. a safety hazard to children playing in the park. There are man arks that front
many
streets with as much or higher traffic than would be on Cypress Street. Some examples are
Wakefield,, Flicek, Vista Hills, Gethsemane, Goodrich, Hazelwood and Battle. Creek.
.2. Demont Avenue
The developer originally proposed connecting to Demont Avenue. Since then he has drawn an
alternate plan showing a cul -de -sac at the end of Demont Avenue. See the sketch on a
( page 25 of
the staff report.) The main problem with this option is that residents on Demont Avenue are
afraid of increased traffic. Demont Avenue was built as a temporary dead -end. The Cit h
p � y s
always planned to extend it. If the developer connects to Cypress Street and uses Demont
Avenue as a second means of access, there would be little additional traffic on Demont Avenue.
It would be faster for residents in the new development to o out Cypress Street to Count Road
g Yp y
C.. Demont Avenue would primarily serve as a second means of access in case Cypress Street
was blocked.
If this connection is made, the developer should redesign the Demont Avenue/Cypress Street
intersection with a four way design. Speeding may become a problem on Cypress Street because
it would be a long straight street. Future residents ma want a four-way stop at the Demont
_ Y Y p
Avenue intersection. The dog int on the plat Would make a hazardous f our -w st
p
intersection.
Another problem with this option is that the developer would have to fill and mitigate a small
wetland. A cul -de -sac would save part of this wetland.
3. Gervais Avenue
This is the developer's preferred option because he can get three more lots. He has shown a
,sketch of the connection to Gervais Avenue. (See the attached sketch at the end of this memo.)
To do this, the developer would have to acquire a small square of property from the owner to the
south.
Gervais Avenue is a substandard commercial street. It is in poor quality and is too close to the
loading docks of the adjacent businesses to the south. There are four businesses that use this
street Ethan Allen, Northern Wholesale Supply Twin City Ven ding and Her manson Dental
Services. Northern Wholesale Supply and Twin City Vendin g have loadin g docks onto Gervais
Avenue. A representative from Northern Wholesale Supply told me that they have semitrailers
2
loadin or unloadin about two or three times a month. These semitrailers block the street. If the
tractor is on the trailer, cars, have to ' around the semitrailers one at a time often onto the
shoulder. Fork lifts use the street
to unload pallets. Tom Hermanson, from Hermanson Dental
Services, told me that Northern's trucks block the street at some time almost e da He said
that the used to complain to the police, but the compan paid the tickets rather than stop
blockin the road. Twin Cit Vendin also has a loadin dock, but the are set back more and do
not block the road, except when the truck is maneuverin into the dock. Bob Ambler from Twin
9
Cit Vendin told me that Northern's t rucks re block the ro He was concerned that
openin up Gervais Avenue would incre their sec risk. For these reasons, the Director of
Public. Safet recom a usin Gervais Avenue as an access to this plat.
To avoid the loadin docks on Gervais Avenue, the Cit would have to move Gervais Avenue to
the north. This would re bu out the two homes on the north side of Gervais Avenue.
The street desi would be limited b the wetland on the north side f Gervais . rvais Avenue. The Cit
ma have to pa for a si share of these costs. In 1979, the Cit considered a feasibilit
stud of this reali A memo from the Cit Mana at that time stated that staff had been
info b an appraiser that the proposed assessment to the properties frontin the existin
Gervais Avenue would be difficult to sustain. This is because these businesses alread have
street access. There ma be some benefit to the businesses with loadin docks that need more
room to load and unload their trucks.
If the plat is connected to C Street, a second connection to Gervais Avenue would not
si reduce traffic on C Street and ma increase traffic. Most of the new residents
would use C Str to Count Road C, rather than Gervais Avenue to the fronta road.
C Street to Count Road C would be faster and easier to use than Gervais Avenue. A
Gervais Avenue connection ma actuall increase traffic on C Street. Emplo park
70-8 * 0 cars at the end of Gervais Avenue each work da Some of the emplo on Gervais
Avenue m a y use C Street to Count Road C, rather than takin Gerva Avenue to the
fronta road. Another problem is that there is no turn-around at the end of Gervais Avenue.
Commercial trucks ma find it easier to continue west on Gervais Avenue to C Street,
rather than turnin around and g oin g back on Gervais Avenue.
Anoth disadvanta with this option is that it would take more of the land the Cit is lookin at
bu for open space.
4. The Drive-In Drivewa
A street to the east over the drive-in propert would be a problem for the developer. Mr. Gon
does not own this propert The drive-in owner still owns this. He plans to develop this propert
into a commercial use. He does not want a public road. A street from the plat to the fronta road
would be about 650 feet lon This option raises the q uestion of who pays for this street and how
will the ri -of -w.a be ac This option is a disadvanta to the Cit as well. It would
create an extra 650 feet of street to maintain.
3
5. Keller Parkway
While a connection to Keller Parkway would satisfy the second access requirement, it would not
significantly reduce traffic on Cypress Street. It would be faster for new residents to use Cypress
Street to County Road C. A connection to Keller Parkway would cut through land that the City is
g Y
planning to buy for open space. Another problem is that the developer does, not own the land
between the plat and Keller Parkway.. There is about 400 feetfrom the south line of the
developer's property. to Keller Parkway..If the developer could not buy this land the C m
p Y y Y
have to condemn this land, build the street and assess the costs to the ad acent prop owner. If
J p p Y
the City can buy this land, the City may want to sell the land adjacent to the street to the
developer to pay for the street and keep the balance for open space. There would be added cost
with this option to extend sanitary sewer south to the metro interceptor. There would be a
continuing operating cost because the sewage would go through a City lift station.
6. Forest Street'
If the City does not buy the west half of the developer's land for open ace the p p p d eveloper could
connect to Forest Street. This would relieve some of the traffic on Cypress Street. Residents on
Forest Street are opposed to this option. They do not want an more traffic b their homes.
Y Y
Conclusion
If the City buys the w st half of the site for open ace, the developer should make connections
� P P P
at Cypress Street and Demont Avenue. If the City does not buy the open developer
ace, the develo
p p p
should connect to Forest Street or Keller Parkway. In this case, the developer could cul -de -sac
Demont Avenue. The recommendations in the attached staff report reflect this option. The
p p
recon mendations approve a preliminary plat for the east half of the site and table the west half
until January 23, 1995. "Preliminary approval on the east half gives the develo er direction as to
p
street connections and tabling the west half allows him time to negotiate with the City.
Y
p:sec9 /maple - st.gwo
Attachment: Gervais Avenue connection sketch
4
�7
� � r
ti
)!
�' � � �
;'
i
.; �r �
r ���
-�� +s `
�'
0
L � �
...� �
a�
:e� �+ '�
� r � ►� �`
���
• ��o...n� •,� ,
•
w•.
�/1IwA� • ` � i
r _ _ i �i
- , - -- - �:
mot- � ' ' �
• • s
''� p .
�� i
� � ��
i f �A ;
�� ...
r
A � �
� � � �
..
��
•,
� �
;.
•
� �
19
SC�ILE 1" � � �Q'
OAS: 1 t —29 -
I,f,%�
�_
....,.......• �T�S
��
o�
� .
f.
i�
�,.r �r►
i
��/
� � �e� .1
' � � � !� rli t�
.i�.. •�:
��
��
r::;
,�;
r
��
��
��
w
i...
�_,
;�.,
—�,
L-
T.
f'
�'I / /I�
�j�'�
19
SC�ILE 1" � � �Q'
OAS: 1 t —29 -
I,f,%�
�_
....,.......• �T�S
��
o�
� .
f.
i�
�,.r �r►
i
��/
� � �e� .1
' � � � !� rli t�
.i�.. •�:
��
��
r::;
,�;
r
��
��
��
w
i...
�_,
;�.,
—�,
L-
T.
f'
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Mapleleaf Estates
LOCATION: Forest and Cypress Strcets, wrth of Gervals Avenue
APPLICANrI': Gorlye-El Company, I ic.
DA'I'S: December 6, 1994
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ......................... ...............................
2
4444.
Project Description . . 4 . 4 0 4 . . . ........................ 4
2
a . . . . . 4 4 9 . some
Requests ....................40 00.. ...............................
2
DISCUSSION ........... ............ ...............................
3
. . . . . . . . . .
Open S p a c e . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . .
• ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land Use Plan and Zoning Changes . ...............................
g g
3
.
Street Vacations
3
Utility Easement Vacation ........... ...............................
4
PreliminaryPlat .......... 0 0 0 0 . . . . ...............
4
. . . 4444. . . . . . . . . . .
Intersection of Demont Avenue and Cypress Street ..................
4
Wetlands 4.,....00....00... 40 .... ...............................
4
Drainage . . . . . • . . . 0 1 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 .
5
Density and Lot Size ..................... . .
5
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Parks .......................... ............4..................
5
ForestStreet Connection
5
0000 ............ . ..........00.00........
Trail
. - . . . . . . .: . . . .. . . . .. . - . . . . . . 'a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
RECOMMENDATIONS ............. , .......... ............................... 7
CITIZEN COMMENTS ............... ............................... 0 .
4444... 11
REFERENCE................................ ....................... goo ....a 15
HISTORY ............................... 15
SITE DESCRIPTION . ............................... 9 9 8 0 . . . . . .ease. 15
SURROUNDING LAND USES ............................... asses . . . 16
LEGAL . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
PLANNINGse . . as . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .sees.... 16
TREES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
SO I LS . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
HOUSING POLICIES ................ 0 0 0 0 . . 0 . 0 0 0 . . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 . . 0 17
INTRODUCTION
Pro jest Description
Mr. Dennis Gonyea, representing Gonyea Company, Inc., is proposing to develop lots for 78
homes. The profect's name is Mapleleaf Estates. This plat would be on a 32.5 -acre site along
Forest and Cyprus Streets, north of Gervais Avenue. (See the location maps on pages 19 and 23.)
Requests
To develop this site, Mr. Gonyea is requesting that the City:
1. Change the City's land use plan map. This change would be from R- 1 S (small lot single
dwellings) and M -1 (light industrial) to R -1 (single dwellings). (See. the land use maps on
pages 20 and 21.)
2. Change the City's zoning map. This change would be from F (farm residential), R- IS (small
lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -1 (single dwellings). (See the
zoning maps on pages 22 and 23.)
3. Vacate the undeveloped streets within the proposed plat. (See the map on page 27.)
4. Approve a cul -de -sac width variance of twenty feet. The Code requires 120 feet of right -of-
way. Mr. Gonyea is proposing a 100 -foot -wide right -of -way at the end of Demont Avenue.
(Note: This cul -de -sac is not shown on the preliminary plat. Demont Avenue is shown as a
through street between Forest Street and Cypress Street. The developer proposed a the cul-
de -sac after submitting the plat to the City. See the detail drawing on page 25 for the cul -de-
sac design.)
5. Approve a preliminary plat for 78 lots. (See the proposed plat on page 24.)
The City staff is proposing the following additional changes:
1. Drop Forest Street as a major collector street from the land use plan map. (See the land
use maps on pages 20 -21.)
2. Vacate part of an existing utility easement between proposed Gervais Avenue and
Sextant Avenue. (See the map on page 24.)
2
4`1 i
DISCUSSION
Open Space
Many neighbors prefer to keep this property for open space or a park. The City would have to
buy this property to keep it as open space. In 1992, the Maplewood Open Space Committee rated
67 sites for permanent open space. The area west of Forest Street and south of Brooks Court (site
#116) was thirteenth on the list of all sites. (See the map on page 26.) The Committee ranked this
site first of seven sites in the neighborhood. The Committee strongly recommended that the City
'buy nineteen sites. On November 2, 1993, the voters approved a $5 million bond issue for open
space. The City is currently studying the purchase of all or part of this site.
The City Attorney advised me that buying this site for open space should not affect the City's
land use plan, zoning and platting decisions. The City cannot use land use controls to get a better
price on land they intend to buy. The City could approve the preliminary plat and later buy the
land.
Land Use Plan and Zoning Changes
The density of this plat was a concern to some neighbors. The proposed land use plan and zoning
changes would reduce the possible number of housing units on part of the site. The developer
could plat the land that the City has planned and zoned R -1 S (small -lot single dwellings) with
7,500-square-foot lots. Instead, he is proposing a zoning change to R -1 (single dwellings) with a
. minimum lot size of 10, 000 square feet. The average lot size would be 14,617 square feet, which
would be similiar to the adjacent neighborhood.
The City's land use plan shows Forest. Street connecting County Road C and Keller Parkway.
(See the land use plan on page 20.) Because of this connection, the City has classified Forest
Street as a major collector. The proposed plat would eliminate the connection to Keller Parkway.
If the City approves this plat, the City should drop the major collector designation for Forest
Street from the land use plan map. This is because it would not connect to Keller Parkway and
serve as a collector street. The developer could still connect a local street to Forest Street.
Street Vacations
The developer is requesting that the City vacate the following rights -of -way in the plat:
1. Connor Avenue, east of Cypress, Meadow Lane
2. Brooks Avenue
3. A 16.5- foot -wide undeveloped public road between the east side of Meadow Lane and the
east side of the proposed plat site
3
4. The. part of the Gervais Avenue easement that is west of the end of the existing street
These rights -of -way are shown on the map on page 27. They were dedicatedm 1950. State law
states that a city cannot vacate a street unless it is in the public interest. There is no public interest
in building streets on these existing rights -of -way. The developer will be dedicating new street
rights -of -way with the plat. The City should keep a 25- foot -wide utility easement for the existing
water main that runs through the Gervais Avenue right -of -way.
Utility Easement Vacation
The City Engineer is recommending that the developer move part of an existing water main that is
between the proposed Gervais Avenue and Sextant Avenue. (See the map on p age 24.) The City
Engineer prefers having the water main in the street. The City would then not have to dig up
yards to repair or maintain the main. This water main is now m a utility easement that runs
through the site. If the City requires the developer to move the water main, then the City should
vacate the part of the easement . that is no longer needed.
Preliminary Plat
Intersection of Demont Avenue and Cypress Street
As mentioned above, the developer is propong to cul- de-sac Demont Avenue and Cypress
Street. The advantages of this cul- de-sac are 'that it would save part of a small wetland and keep
additional traffic off of Demont Avenue. (See the wetland on the preliminary plat on page 24.)
However, to save the wetland, the developer is requesting a cul- de-sac width variance. While the
substandard width will work, it would not be the normal width.
A long dead end is another problem. If the City buys the west half of the site for open space, the
developer would not connect to Forest Street or Keller Parkway. The streets south of Cypress
Street and Conner Avenue would be a dead end longer than 1,000 feet. The City Code limits dead
ends to 1,000 feet, unless no other alternative is possible. Connecting to Demont Avenue is.
p o ssl'ble. If the City buys the west half of the site for open space, the developer should connect
Demont Avenue to Cypress Street. If this connection is made, the developer should redesign the
Demont Avenue /Cypress Street intersection with a four -way design. Speeding may become a
problem. on Cypress Street because it would be a long straight street. Future residents may want a
four -way stop at the Demont Avenue intersection. The jog intersection on the plat would make a
hazardous four -way stop intersection.
Wetlands
Several of the residents were concerned about the loss of the wetlands on the site. There are
several wetlands on the site. (Seethe wetlands on the preliminary plat drawing on page 24 or the
larger plat drawings that are attached.) The developer will preserve most of these wetlands. He is
4
proposing to fill part of one wetland at the :northwest corner of Outlot B (to build Cypress Street).
The developer -may want to reconfigure the south half of the Outlot B wetland to realign the
Demont Avenue /Cypress Street intersection. Any wetland filling requires a Watershed Board
permit. The developer must mitigate by adding twice the wetland area that the developer fills.
The City should require wetland buffer easements to protect the wetlands.
Drainage
Several neighbors complained about the existing drainage on Cypress Street. These neighbors
were concerned that the new development would increase these problems. The City Engineer is
requiring that the developer's drainage plan not add to any existing drainage roblems. The City
ty
Engineer told me that the developer's engineer could design the project so the drainage would
not harm nearby properties. The staff is recommending that the developer acquire off -site
easements for any off -site wetlands that he plans to drain into.
Density and Lot Size
Several neighbors thought there are too many lots in this plat. The proposed lot sizes range from
10,049 square feet to 38,483 square feet with an average lot size of 14,617 square feet. The
average lot size is larger than many of the lots on Brooks Court and Demont Avenue. These
range in size from 10,140- 21,466 square feet. The City Code requires at least 10,000 square feet
above a drainage easement and 75 feet of width. In addition, the average size of the lots within
the shoreland must be at least 15,000 square feet. All of the proposed lots, meet or exceed City
standards. The City cannot reduce the number of lots if the developer is meeting the City's
ordinances.
Parks
A concern of several of the neighbors was the amount of park land available in the area. They
feel there is a need for additional park land in the area. The City's Director of Parks and
Recreation told me that Kohlman Park would serve this development. He also told me that the
City is planning a trail extension and additional playground equipment to Kohlman Park in 1995.
The City is also planning for a possible land purchase on the east side of the park for a tennis
court. The City has listed these improvements in the 1995 -1998 Maplewood Capital
Improvement Program.
Forest Street Connection
The connection to Forest Street is controversial with many of the neighbors. If the City does not
buy the west half of the plat for open space, the developer needs a second means of access, other
than Cypress Street. There are four options: Forest Street, Gervais Avenue, a street to the east
over the drive -in property or Keller Parkway.
k
The developer is proposing a connection to Forest Street. Many neighbors are opposed to this
because it would add traffic to Forest Street. Since Forest Street would not be connected to
Keller Parkway, the traffic would be local only.
Several neighbors suggested connecting to Gervais Avenue. Gervais Avenue is a substandard
commercial street. It is in poor quality and is too close to the loading docks of the adjacent
businesses to the south. Semi-trucks back into the loading docks and block most of the street.
Cars have to singly go around the semis, often onto the dirt boulevard. Fork lifts dart onto the
street to unload pallets. For these reasons, the Director of Public Safety recommends against
using Gervais Avenue as an access to this plat. To make Gervais Avenue useable, the City would
have t o* buy out the homes to the north and move Gervais, Avenue to the north. The City had
previously considered this project and denied it. The denial was because of the cost and objections
from surroundmg home owners. People did not want Gervais Avenue connected to Forest Street.
They feared trucks would go up Forest Street to County Road C.
A street to the east over the drive -in property has problems. Mr. Gonyea does not own this
property. The drive -in owner still owns this. He plans to develop this property into a commercial
use. He does not want a public road. This option raises the question of who pays for this street? A
drive -in road would be longer and more expensive than a connection to Keller Parkway.
Connecting the developer's plat to Keller Parkway, ..with or without a connection to Forest
Avenue, is the last option. The people on Cypress Street want a connection to Forest Street to
take the traffic off of Cypress Street. The people on Forest Street do not want their street
connected to the plat for the same reason. A co romise would be to connect the developer's
plat to Keller Parkway without connecting to Forest Street. This would take some traffic off
Cypress Street without connecting o Forest Street. The problem is who s for the street
g a P pays
extension to Keller Parkway?
Trail
A trail should connect this neighborhood to Keller Parkway and the regional park at Spoon Lake.
The best location would be through the property to the west. The trail would then come out
across the street from the regional park. The City should build this trail if the City buys the
property to the west for open space. If the City does not buy this property, the City should require
that the developer build a trail between Lots 24 and 25, south of Gervais Avenue. The City should
extend this trail from the plat to Keller Parkway. The developer is proposing to build a sanitary
sewer line from the proposed Gervais Avenue between Lots 24 and 25 to the south. (See the map
on page 24.) In addition to pedestrian and bicycle access, the trail would provide access to
maintain the sewer.
6
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolutions on pages 36 and 37. These resolutions change the land use plan and
zoning map from R- IS (small lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light industrial) to R -1
(single dwellings).. The resolution also drops the major collector designation for Forest
Street. This change is for the Mapleleaf Estates plat. In addition to the findings required
by the Code, this change is for the following reasons:
1. The developer is proposing to develop the site for single dwellings.
2. This change would reduce the allowable intensity and traffic from this site.
3. The R -1 classification would be more compatible with the surrounding homes than the
present classifications.
4. Forest Street would no longer serve as a major collector street.
B. Adopt the resolution on page 39. This resolution vacates the undeveloped street rights -of-
way (Connor Avenue east of Cypress Street, Meadow Lane, Brooks Avenue, the 16.5-
foot -wide undeveloped public road and the west end of Gervais Avenue). The Ci ty should
vacate these street rights -of -way because:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build streets on these rights -of -way.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
This vacation is subject to the City retaining a 25- foot -wide utility easement over the east
end of Gervais Avenue.
C. Table the request to vacate the utility easement that would be on the property line of Lots
7, 8 and 9, Block 6 of the proposed plat until January 23, 1995.
D. Approve the resolution on page 41. This resolution approves a cul -de -sac width variance
for a cul -de -sac at the end of the existing Demont Avenue for the followin g reasons:
1. The variance would save part of a wetland.
2. The City Engineer stated that the cul -de -sac would be large enough for snow - plowing.
This variance is subject to the developer platting the west half of the site. If he sells the
west half for open space, Demont Avenue must be connected to Cypress Street.
7
E. Approve following parts of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat (received by the City
on July 26, 1994): Block 1; Block 2, Lots 1 -17; Block 3; Block 4, Lots 1--4 and Block 5
Lots 1 -8. Table the remaining parts of the plat until January 23, 1995 Before the Cit
Council approves the final plat, a developer shall complete the followin g conditions:
1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor
will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public
improvements and meet all City requirements.
b. * Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Pay the City for the cost of traffic - control and street identification signs.
d. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These
signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no
mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or dumping.
e. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
f. Have NSP install street lights in three locations, primarily at street
intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City
Engineer's approval
2. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site
drainage. The City Engineer shall include in the developer's agreement an grad
p ln' y � g
that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval.
3 . * Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These
plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, trail and street
plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water
Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each
home site.
(2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction will
disturb.
8
(3) Show sedimentation bas insas required by the watershed board.
c. The drainage plan shall show catch basins between Lots 5 and 10, Block 3 and
: dedicate necessary easements for these drains and p i p es.
d. Provide storm water ' storage and/or an off -site outlet pipe between Outlots A and
B, based on a drainage study done by the developer's engineer. The City Engineer
shall approve the exact location, capacity and outlet for this . stora e If the City
ty
requires more pond capacity, the developer may have to drop lots. The lots shall
meet the Shoreland requirements.
e. Provide adequate storm water capacity for the wetlands on Lots 19 and 26,
Block 2. The developer's engineer shall provide a drainage study to determine
adequate capacity. The City Engineer shall approve the exact location, capacity
and outlet for these. If the City requires more pond capacity, the developer may
have to drop a lot(s).
f. The tree plan shall show the size, species and location of any trees that the
developer will plant as replacement trees.
4. Show the following changes on the final plat:
a. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat.
These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines
and five feet wide along the side property lines.
b. Change Street C to Demont Avenue and change Street D to Adele Street.
c. Drainage easements for drainage areas and wetlands that this project would
affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that will be south of Lot 19
Block 2.
d. Drop Lots 1, 2 or 3 from Block One or channel the drainage between Outlots A
and B through a drainage pipe.
e. Redesign the Demont Avenue/ Cypress Street intersection to eliminate the jog
and make a four -way intersection. The developer shall redesign the Demont
Avenue /Cypress Street intersection to eliminate the jog and make a four-way-
y
stop design. If the City decides not to buy the west half of the plat, the
developer may cul -de -sac Demont Avenue.
f. If the developer sells the west half of the site to the City, he may add a short
cul -de -sac at the south end of Cypress Street with lots around the cul -de -sac.
9
The design shall be subject to the director of community development's
approval.
5. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the Watershed District.
6.* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. These shall include:
a. Give the City wetland easements over the wetlands: These easements shall
cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet surrounding a wetland. The
easement shall prohibit any building or structures within twenty feet of the
wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within ten feet of the
wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this easement is to protect
the water quality of the wetlands from. homeowners' fertilizer and to protect the
wetland habitat from residential encroachment.
b. Drainage easements for the off-site drainage areas and wetlands that this project
would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that will be south of Lot
19, Block 2.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may waive any
conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or
approves the final plat.
10
CITIZEN COMMENTS
We asked the nearby property owners for their opinion of these requests. We sent surveys to the
property owners within 350 feet of the site. Out of 102 properties, we received 31 replies. Nine
were for the requests, 17 were against, four had comments and one had no comment.
Those for the requests had the following comments:
1. It meets City concerns for eliminating commercial traffic from residential areas.
(Herringer - Minneapolis)
2. As a local church, we like to see new families move into the area. (Lakeview Lutheran
Church)
3. It will improve the appearance of the area. (Ambler - 1065 Viking Drive)
4. This plan is the best one presented in the seven years I have lived here - The only thing
that could possibly help would be a road connection to Gervais Avenue or Keller
Parkway on the north end. Traffic flow to County Road C could present a problem. I
know this has been looked at before, and the concern is the use of the frontage road on
Highway 61 - some traffic would go west to Arcade if access was provided through.
(Berry - 984 Brooks Court)
5. R- l zoning is best for me - should keep resale of my home up. Nice expansion to tax
base. Forest not connected -like keeping the isolation. If connected, Forest will turn into
a freeway! Would like to see park improvement as part of the plan. (Blautuss - 962
Demont Avenue)
6. I would rather the land be used as R -1 than anything else. Comments:
a. I would like to see stop signs and other appropriate signage to warn drivers of
children playing.
b. It would be nice if the trees could be left in place as much as possible until lots are
sold to avoid having views of a barren wasteland until homes are in.
c. Another concern is that the new homes be of a value that would not lower existing
homes values. (Gore - 974 Demont Avenue)
7. There are no through streets. This should promote slower speed and hopefully less crime.
However, many of the lots are smaller than the current homes have. Enlarge the size of
the lots to encourage similar homes to what exist. (Kiekhoeter - 969 Demont Avenue)
11
Those with comments gave the following:
1. I do not object to the development but I would like to see some changes in the ro osal.
p p
We live on County Road C between Cypress and Forest. There is already way to much
unsafe traffic on County Road C. I know that it is collector road but at some point there
has to be some alternative. There is no other way out for the 100 -home development next
to the proposed development and for people that live north of Gervais and west of
Kohlman Lake. Beam does not go through and the changed Count Road D so you can't
g y g y y
enter Highway 61 ' so we get all that traffic.
I would like to see you -punch a road out on the other side of this development, either
Cypress or Forest or Gervais Avenue. You are also planning on running the traffic by a
Maplewood City park (Kohlman) were children play everyday. County Road C is a
hazard, someone is going to get hurt ! there is no other exit for the people in the
development behind us now. We were promised when they built the last development,
they would put through Forest. I would just like to see at least one out exit. (Huot - 988
County Road C)
2. We are for the rezoning to R -1 but our main objection is that we do not want Forest
Street to go through. We feel access to this new neighborhood should come from other
sources (such as Gervais) because of the already heavy traffic on Forest from our
neighborhood. This will give the new neighborhood its own privacy and improved
g p y p
quality of area because of no through traffic. The streets of both neighborhoods will be
safer and less busy. We also feel that some open space for a ark is necessary. With the
p park
two areas (Mapleleaf Estates and Carsgrove Meadows) there will be over 150 home.
Kohlman Park is at one end of Carsgrove Meadows but isn't much of a ark! If Ma leleaf
p p
Estates has as many I children as Carsgrove Meadows does, this is a definite need.
(Wah1strand - 972 Brooks Court)
3. See the letter on page 28 for additional comments.
Those against the requests had the following comments:
1. I would first like this space considered for open space. If that is not feasible, I would like
to see Forest Street remain as is (as a dead end) fewer lots and as much wildlife and as
many trees maintained as possible in the proposed development plan. Rezoning to R -1 is
a must. (Peters - 948 Brooks Court)
2. I object to this proposal because Maplewood has very few open spaces where deer and
wildlife can exist. In the past we have been able to enjoy this beautiful piece of land that
house fox, deer and other animals in their natural habitat. We sincerely hope the City will
be able to purchase part of this land to maintain its beauty and not develop lots 9 through
15 by rezoning this piece of land OS (open space). We also oppose Forest Street as being
12
a main traffic route to this piece of land. If possible, we prefer an entrance at Gervais
Avenue to access the proposed development. (Leafgre n - 954 Brooks Court)
3. The changes are too great for the neighborhood. I would support the proposal however
with a few changes as follows. The following changes to the proposal would make it
acceptable to me and I believe will improve the neighborhood and still be attractive to the
developer.:
a. Leave Forest Street as is. Do not extend it but rather add a new entrance to the new
development at Gervais or somewhere else on the south side.
b. Add a park to the new development. There are lots of children in the area and I
presume many more in the new development. Parks and open space add a lot to a
neighborhood and should be included in the proposal. I suggest lots 9 -15 and on the
end of Forest Street. If the area must be developed, I do favor R -1. (Varberg - 960
Brooks Court)
4. Traffic flow, schools and parks would be greatly strained to unacceptable levels. I would
not be opposed to this plan with the following changes:
a. Do not let Forest go through to the new development except bike and walking path.
b. Neighborhood park with no parking.
c. Reduce the number of homes by making the lots bigger (15 less homes).
d. Make entrance from County Road C and Gervais.
I voted for the school referendum because of current .student teacher ratios and facility
problems. Lets not over build again. (Sargent - 965 Brooks Court)
5. There are negatives to my neighborhood I would want addressed. First, I very much
approve of the rezone to R -1 classification. I would however disagree that 78 homes
should be constructed here. Maplewood has a chance to incorporate some open space
with this development, thus reducing the number of homes which would have a negative
impact. The negatives of concern are:
a. Increased traffic flow through the neighborhood putting the many children here at
risk.
b. Putting Forest Street through will bring traffic in and out of our neighborhood that
doesn't necessarily live here.
c. Building that many homes without leaving some type of open space will have a
negative affect on the aesthetics of the community and the environment (greater
pollution, too much run -off and reduction of wildlife).
13
To preserve the beauty and quietness of our neighborhood, I would suggest making a cul-
de -sac out of Forest Street, create a community park behind the homes on Brooks Court
accessible by walking path only, and exit traffic from homes along proposed Street A to
either Gervais or Keller Parkway. (Dey - 966 Brooks Court)
6. The destruction of open space and increased traffic in area. I feel that this area should not
be developed. One of the reasons we built in this area was due to the open, undeveloped
woods around the area. The proposed development would not only destroy these areas
but drive out the wildlife that thrives there. My proposal would include the developer
making a nature preserve out of this area in conjunction with the nearby chain of lakes.
Another option would be to sell the area to the City as part of the open space acquisition
program that our taxes were raised for.
I realize the City will look at this from income stand point in the form of additional tax
base. Therefore, the City will probably not consider the views of the few residents who
presently live in the area. If this area is inevitably developed, I oppose the extension of
Forest- Street to access this area. I feel that access to this area should be made off Keller
Parkway to the south of this area rather than burden the residents of Carsgrove Meadows
with the increased traffic flow. (Thomafla - 971 Brooks Court)
7. I think it would be OK to develop the theater for housing but I strongly object to the
development of the little treed area directly behind my house. In that section are
numerous wild life - birds, fox ... even a family of deer. It seems a shame to destroy
their precious habitat with one more housing plan. The deer actually come into our yards
during the early morning or evenings. Then in the day, they go right back to their quiet
haven in the small forest. Destroying this last vestige of their habitat in this area is sad.
My hope would be that the City would make the developers limit their plan and avoid
this section, thus preserving a nature trail (many locals hike through this area) and one of
the few remaining deer habitats right here in Maplewood. (Johnson - 978 Brooks Court)
8. The details are unclear concerning the types of buffer created between existing properties
and the new development. What . about the City easement? Between the Farm and theater
property and the current homeowners on the farthest eastern side of Carsgrove Meadows.
I do not like to see Forest as a main vain disrupting a current community for another. It
will be the biggest roadblock to gain neighborhood approval. (Warner - 983 Brooks
Court)
9. Demont Avenue east would no longer be a dead -end street to the east. Would increase
traffic. Make Demont Avenue east a cul -de -sac or dead -end to the east of Forest. Also,
decrease the number of new single family houses from the proposed 78. Fifty is much
more reasonable. Finally, increase the size of Kohlman Park. (Kutrubs - 950 Demont
Avenue)
14
10. There are approximately 20 children that are age 8 and younger that play on Demont
Avenue east which would no longer be adead -end street. (Haubrich - 980 Demont
Avenue)
11. The number of lots is too dense and there isn't a provision for parks and open space. We
would support it if parks or open space were incorporated into the plan and Forest were
preserved. Also Forest Street should not go through to Gervais or Keller Parkway.
(Seppala - 2462 Forest Street)
12. This change would make my property more difficult to use or sell. Develop within the
limits of the current zoning. (Let them buy us out.) (Lund - 2411_ Maplewood Drive)
13. Do not want zoning changed -leave it as it exists. (Zuercher -North St. Paul)
14. See the letters on pages 30 -34 and the petition starting on page 42.
REFERENCE
HISTORY
On September 23, 1958, the City Council approved a rezoning from F (farm residence) to BC
(business commercial) for the Maple Leaf Drive -in.
On May 28, 1991, the City Council approved land use plan and zoning changes for the area west
of Highway 61, north of Highway 36. This was for the Comprehensive Plan update. These
changes included much of the property in this proposal. The land use plan changes were from RL
(low- density residential), RM (medium - density residential) and LSC (limited service
commercial) to RM (medium-density residential) and BW (business warehousing). The zoning
changes were from R -1 (single dwellings), F (farm residence) and BC (business commercial) to
R- IS (small-lot single dwelling) and M -1 (light manufacturing). These are the land use and
zoning designations now in the area.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Gross Area: 3 2.5 acres
Net Area: 26.2 acres
Proposed Density: 2.98 homes per net acre
Existing land use: undeveloped and drive -in movie theater
15
SURROUNDING LAND. USES
North: houses on Brooks Court, Cypress Street and a manufactured home park
East:- commercial properties and houses on the west side of Highway 61
South: undeveloped and commercial property on Gervais Avenue
West: undeveloped property and houses in Carsgrove's Meadows
LEGAL
For street vacations, Chapter 412.851 of Minnesota State law states that "No such vacation shall
be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so ..."
PLANNING
The existing R -1(S) land use plan designation is for small lot single dwellings and the M -1
designation is for light manufacturing.
The proposed R -1 (single dwellings) land use designation is for low-density residential land uses
like single dwellings. - -
Lot Sizes: The average lot size in the proposed plat is 14,617 square feet. This is similar to the
lot sizes (10,140— 21,466 square feet) on Brooks Court and Demont Avenue. The City Code
requires at least 10, 000 square feet above a drainage easement and 75 feet of width for each lot
outside the shoreland zone. All of the proposed Tots meet or exceed City standards.
The shoreland rules require an average lot area of at least 15, 000 square feet in shoreland
districts. The proposed lots in the shoreland district have an average lot area of 15,190 square
feet.
TREES
The developers tree plan shows 95 large trees of a variety of species scattered across the site.
They are proposing to keep 31 of the large trees and remove 64 large trees. In addition, they are
proposing to plant 64 trees to replace the 64 large trees that they would remove. The City's tree
ordinance defines large trees as those over eight inches in diameter. Large trees do not include
box elder, cottonwoods or poplar trees. The developer plans to grade most of this site.
16
SOILS
The Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District informed us that the soils on this site are
suitable for development if the developer controls the erosion. The District recommends that the
developer get specific soils data before developing the site.
HOUSING POLICIES
The land use plan has eleven overall land use goals. Of these, four apply to this proposal. They
are: provide for orderly development, protect and strengthen neighborhoods, e land
planned for streets, and provide safe and attractive neighborhoods and commercial areas. The
land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that
relate to this . project. They are:
- Safe and adequate access will be provided for all properties.
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative
economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments.
Whenever possible, changes in types of land uses should occur so that similar uses front on
the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers.
- The City requires drainage and erosion control plans with new developments. Such plans
shall not increase the rate of runoff and shall prevent erosion.
- Protect neighborhoods from activities which produce excessive noise, dirt, odors or which
generate heavy traffic.
- Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by
adequate buffering and separation.
The housing plan also has policies about housing quality that the City should consider with this
development. They are:
Plan and design new housing to:
- Protect existing housing, natural features and neighborhood identity and quality.
Assure there are adequate utilities, community facilities and convenient shopping.
Maintain or strengthen the character of established neighborhoods and assure that all
housing units are safe, sanitary secure and free from blight.
17
p:sec9lmaplelfinem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map (Existing)
3. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed)
4. Property Line/Zoning Map (Existing)
5. Property Lane /Zoning Map (Proposed)
6. Proposed Mapleleaf Estates Preliminary Plat
7. Demont Ave. Cut- de -sac Detail
8. Property Line Map (Open Space)
9. Property Lane Map (Vacations)
10. 8 -I1 -94 letter from Moore - Foster
11. Statement from Wiermann
12: Statement from Kornmann
13. Letter from Van Elsberg (Northernaire)
14. 8 -11 -94 letter from Oak Ridge Pond Rentals
15. Letter from the Seversons
16. Land Use Plan Change Resolution
17. Zoning Map Change Resolution
18. Street Vacation Resolution
19. Cul-de -sac Width Variance Resolution
20. Petition
21. Project Plans (separate attachment)
18
Attachment 1
% o t•
• ••• ., •• ,• +•• ,.11 ,}•••.• •• .•• , •
go
•
•• W
..
Kohlrnon
U a
G�srwta• • � �.
Lake
� O
• J � �' COUNTY
I PLAZA CIR @ r
z ALVARao OR PALM �
3 AEII�ECREST OR
C 1. SuMMfT CT.
2.
z. roU NTRWD
3. DULUTH CT.
�,•�. 3. � 0 4. LYDIA ST.
BEAM
o
W
V
N
Z
KOHLMMJ AVE.
4
DE LNILLE OR .
CT,
P PLO
C
5
mERIQNIlr DR
• .
v
CONNOR C •:;:
v
3
�Qlk
z
w
CT. W .
DES '' "`'`'''
J
o
CO.
RD.
AVE. �
a.
v L
O
,.
JUNCTION
Z
AVE. W
z
O
J
»'::,;;::�f;:
a
�RKF
•:;.:mot
�7.�:: ;i;, ».��i,
cc �
(1 ) Ci•tAMBERS
ST
(
j
PKWY -
E1.DR 10
,RSE
�,VE.
ro •`
G
►O�
SKILL
AV
E ' SKILL MAN
SHE
�z
,.
. .. % 0
.. .....••
.
�
V)
VIKING OR.
Kes
toce
_
••
v
>
W
Via•,:
3
z
LAURIE CT.
e
y
uj
.---
9URKr CT.
BURKE
AV
Yeol.ei�.�t
/ O Q
E z
E DRIDGE
AV
v
v
Oehr fine
Lake
BELMONT �.
O
AA. W
/ �
I /
SKILLMM
AV.
KEL�R
KENW
000
n 58
c.i
_.
W ! A
C 1. SuMMfT CT.
2.
z. roU NTRWD
3. DULUTH CT.
�,•�. 3. � 0 4. LYDIA ST.
BEAM
o
W
V
N
Z
KOHLMMJ AVE.
J
Q
f
GERVAIS AVE.
�
ROAD
C
TO
v
CT,
v
�Qlk
z
w
J
o
CO.
RD.
AVE. �
a.
v L
J
Q
f
GERVAIS AVE.
LOCATION MAP
*.Na: SITE
19
4
N
v
COPE
LARK
CT.
J
o
CO.
RD.
v
v L
LELAND RD.
O
,.
JUNCTION
Z
AVE. W
z
O
J
a
�RKF
AVE
cc �
(1 ) Ci•tAMBERS
ST
(
j
E1.DR 10
,RSE
�,VE.
BEL.MONrT
G
►O�
SKILL
AV
E ' SKILL MAN
SHE
�z
LOCATION MAP
*.Na: SITE
19
4
N
Attachment 2
REVISED 10/29/93
County Rd. D
'v
C
m
V
m
J
1
�o
i
v
0
0
0
E
4C
IN
Vadnals Heights
69;v prii
t ty Rd. C
'..KEY
o P =PARK
OS = OPEN SPACE
f M -1 = LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
major Cutplet;tVI �I
R - = SINGLE DWELLINGS
R -3(M) = RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSIT
t w
Highway 36
interchange
r
R - r,
im minor collector
�o
�F
minor
Beam Ave.
I collector
4
N
'Y
20
Attachment 3
REVISED 1029/93
County Rd. D
�a
�v
a�
C
m
V
m
m.
0
0
m�
0
principal arterial
o Dn. i`" 111r
KOHLMAN LAKE
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN
...........
..........
..........
...........
..........
...........
..........
SITE (P
I N�
Vadnaic, Heights
rty Rd. C
F'
r t ' KEY
I
P =PARK
OS = OPEN SPACE
M -1 = LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
, ' major collector 4
R -1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS
Q!1 Gervais
R-3( = RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSIT
Highway 36
i interchange
r -.
I
i
M: minor collector
;o
IF
minor
t Beam Ave.
i collector
Q
N
Y
21
Attachment 4
--m— . -.1 , i I., ? I —f cL
99%
MANUFACTURED HOME PARK
owl I
4 &1.
ee7. SAO" 1
Is
.;': ;.;.:•r. : lira:• : %: %:�.•: %:•:�.•:•:•:•:•:::v:•' -- —� ....� �._.?!J. � � � ��
13 14
vi
0606
C
BRO
-' 751 Ov ......
.. . .. . ...
234
C ........ .
a.lL
DRIVE—IN THEATER
(49)
AL
Vol
..........
................ . .
. .... ...
Ne
I W1. 4196 0'
.......... I N. ...A
. 0�0
$to& **- x ( I 00 di• l f . x
el
Abe
W 7 W - W � 0 IMI AVENUE
%
q
62)
da ID
A I -
NJ 7t; —
M 40 \ % 7
K
F FARM RESIE)ENTIAL
IN sit).
------ Wr 1-1 ft
R1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS
HIGHWAY 36
a _ � � _ RIS SINGLE DWELLINGS ( SMALL Ll
•
M1 = LIGHT MA NUFACTURING
KELLER LAKE
:
0. -
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
S I T E (EXISTING)
11 INTY ROAD C GeRM:Tlf-
22
Attachment 5
- �:- o�►o -- r COUNTY ROAD C
71
fit) 1, 11 1
J im
MANUFACTURED HOME PARK '. .K
wxl,
w drr'
41
IN I
23 T a
&Abbe
IN so z
l or
"All
... ........ • . . . . 1 C
.... ....... . .,.* -ci
IAJ
it Oboe,
X
BROO, 4
3
DRIVE —IN THEA TER
X xWS.
X. : %J:'• :;::ti :ti' :... :: :1 : : JJ }:' •: JJ. } :;. J:•:•:;• • • ::J.J. +:.•J.;•;•i ;•;'••;•;•::: :•::• 1 %;
44
-Q
X-6,
. .. ... .
. WN;
§
M
*dot
Z
t
Xx
0
416
Low
lost#* GERVAIS AVENUE ..k.
40 1
SITE
AM vv 22
!D
Aw)
rx)
�m 4
�.-�; I/Ab -.r 401�. M
'KEY Ila
I
F FARM.RESIDENTIAL
■ ` � (1\ , tip.
SINGLE DWELLINGS
HIGHWAY 36 , � Il
LO
RIS SINGLE DWELLINGS (SMALL
�.�..- : Ml = LIGHT MANU FACTURING
KELLER LAKE
PROPERTY L1NE ZONING MAP
(PROPOSED)
23
• Attachment 6
rd
V Sw fir
F -------------
V I CI NIT Y ICI Y MAP
. . . . . . .... NOT TO SCALE s. Nows
"WI.M.-vouh, ILI
WWII PLAT UNE •
N
S. r
FOFtrSI STRU?
690.75
- SESAiXS l t1•!8" - 4
30 MY MOLT YARD
S ruy M Y&AW (GARAor)
10• SO['f&RD (4WS)
VOZ Or LOV OEPTw ►Olk NEAR YARD
�!t a X15 S1101tr� rs Z� � .
WMINUM AftLA OF LOTS • 10,000 SO. rT.
ONA1110 Or VOCILL FAAKY LOTS • 67
133 Lit
OTHIN
a
W*wjM Wit AREA 16.000 SO rT OLWJtAGE 0. Sr.
MUM Or ONGLE rAIMY LOTS - 11 &%UAGE LOT AREA • 15.190 SO. TT.
TOTAL WJMP LOTS • 78
101&: ALMA . 3246 AC OMS GRAPHIC SCALE
AICA OF SMUTS • 6.30 ACRES 1 I r
.Nr't AREA 29-16 ACRES J r •
DEMONT AVENUE-k 3 ack - 100 1`16
WS - -LL 4 0 ! EUJ40 it Z-
Lit - LW mZrft 14� i L 6
Al - socu DVXLUNG 0.6
MWOSED ZMW, Itl
6
ui
v
10.110DO S
130 Ga- 2=111111 @WOW
n or" n" 11110111111101"
CL ILS-AIL- AN s 11.2 sr. ICAW vr-\ 2n Sr
Lu WtRAW 11101116MIN
T ,
T - top As onMEAM wr
I 8 10 • a 5 owounwow W"Mft)
1.0.w Sr. iIJ47 S.F. ; o�-. S
AR sm
2 7 a I 1 1.241 &►.
'D
10.440 r 10L
QA 40 #A 146 `1111L < *
2 14.043 Sr. 7 . SJ
984 Sr. 8 2
4-"-4
SO
SE AVENUE" % L
4
. 2 V
lie 12"WATERMAIN AND EASEMENT
the Wwo of the stoto
Z4 ,ardor rp , - , r2l 09"t
- 1 40.00 e t o a" thol I
6t sm.
-1
40 10
19
b
0 AW Ift. Dot*
z
3�11 S.►.
GLE RVAI S AVENUE
1 2 2,4
-.Ln ' 20.p. eSF EXCE
mob � 4am- vow 7
Owl-
i. $ log w
" 6 0,0 so v at t 1 0 a r OVA& am—
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE
MAPLELEAF ESTATES*
PRELIMINARY PLAT
10WM/D AM
GONM coup"y
w movzu" 7mm►m
UBM►OUS HDOMOTA 65403
(101,21377-0191
24
MIDWE%-:)T SURIVI TEL No .6l,',-2'-786-q.208 Oct 9 4 15 N o F 2
Attachment 7
T " A"
LEAF
.TE
1 P) 60 0
25
Attachment 8
1 loi � 1 � ..... � • . � S • '' -. � ~ _ � � fir S b~
PALM COVAT (rn ;•spa? a. ) , • ' 'y
co �► '. +� aW ,, *, CONNOR AVE.
46 at • - -- r - - lb
AAR
1 � • A o
.^ !w1 1 �L. l M) .;�
«) CONK OR �, w, . o («� , . , � � IL s ! , � r -.
�' ;�. �� lei t � � isl (W ii f • � l•n�) .�. �..�•..
11• s �
' °l' t♦ •
� � t1 .�.. it VO Is �0.? . 1•Ws. .
- ���
U E, aw . � � � s � (sj� Gi (� t s �►�
2► 1 cw s
Saw 5
t 3� s OEMONT4 W AVE
= t 1
,
s. 6" S." os
WAW (y) O + st u u
24 V • 7 • i �d a oeae
o
1 0• sT • T
a •/ .. ..
1 . . . may.. y, • . . y.
Jr , R; ••} : •:? •: {:;:':• •::RM.' �• ••.••; •'} }•;• { R 4 •. {M R••'••••••• • •.J • SiK •' 1 �
:�`� . `. � • ,•
M. • • `•;,,} ..1 •R:' j • 'S y •,y
,,• � } 'SS'µ,.R,. Y' :':; ,•'; h � �i - t s t� �
60 ' • �R y: '�� 'SRS,';:{ }: • tip •}•:'{:ti:; .;'r.{Y:;.{;} ••yY ...: - �n •..�
• � R •• • �r�.R, { , "R ., R;:; Ri•.Y.R'• r:;:;:; {}:•:•'•.• t�l Cry
L:;�;.{ } : },� yr'•..R ' {Y} {1 R .•�.� { ; � i0 CaW C � 4 �
• `R r7• +' R. !,� ...;:Y 'Y r' t ire ` � • c
• �y' j • j, : • L • •• • •, ••, 4 •,.•. •RSR'R?�'}• ; ••• }y •'• ' � � `�.t*. �R,
` `. {� r •'r.• {ti; •.:� R titi;JR'{ 4 Y, - f -titiRS • . O O �� t 7
. •R R.... e R O
s;,R,�lr''S��'''Ri• Y : �.�, • .•` • R } yy .,.y�.,�.L • "' • •�•,•••y; . j ,1., }.' } -
J •'•:•JL{R�' j�{R , f • 'R'S�� '• •' '•'.:` �.' ;:;p'•', . ''
.• •{ .R ��.' .• •Y •' •''' E 1h� i
�{ti'Y:ti:R • ;• �L ' ►R,:� •S �y { ,_ • R l ,�R' .• •j?yY
,••� r.RR�,.,y�,,, M - .
• ,Y � "`�: �:�r , 'wi'{ ?.' + y;?l�' }:LR�••,•SC•}:.;'• }' ° A_ 1 1• S Til�a1- {
.!I>a+t • 'r:;:: }R•. •:•:•' : r r{
�M •;.;•;} .h',S'�;:ti `, R �:;; � •:yy {• R • �' . ],�� yR{•"`i+..;lti {: { } ••. � � ' f, l
y : •, :;} . ''��. yR 1i {. , �•tiWr,'•}, 'r':Rti' }'4 T' yJ•, • . Z - i � •1t.NT �• ' NI +h.
•' y , , yy Yi �'•ti j j••• { "ti AL1 • •{► 'O•'.{SJ• yS . 1• a �.r7
'• :i ?rR.•} {; {�i } ::• :•y %" S:S} . f,;R.••r•,,.`:1 i i' }:? J• };' }:; •i s!. !•
•' �❖ry • •,• •r :•:Y:':'j �,;.y R'r }:' ••• } • i••' 1 ` • ♦ i ' • • • :: J y ,• ,.• y:S:R
.M �' / ` ry S; {�,•', In- �.,. ,:y , S•• S r' ' .R . •Rj .R,S {• ;•::� . �S R ' !�.'e'.;� L'{• :•' ' r ': } y ::.. •, Y � rti }Y1R •'RN '• Y• •• •••• } r .;•• } M� : {S'• R;:; • r •; Y'J { • •::1 • •:;• ;, y: Y • R R • '• , { :{• • ••• s•� r 'r
-,, •Y.
•; y;•; d• y'` ys•? ti{ R_ S; •'::ti'y�''y; !%..
:ti,+'.;•'•.,'S' 'i.RY y r, • '�:�' lJ. 'j {�,,;' y ' ti ' • '.S� }• y; {• •j, .y};R }• }''•'•
r •': ;:', : 1:;•. l:: , • P,ri 6 Y , 1. •ti Py {• , J ' • }i :•• •�. •Y:•r''J SlJ, :•rl:} •:�:: }Y, • S , � j r�R• • y{ , : ' y � �;;'•} R ., y ;.p' • • • • S ' � r { }} •�
•/; ;;�•'': • • {r,..jJ'•y:: ' • •,• ti•'r'ti':• ;•: }:Jr }:`:' };t;I, }:'i :Y� {. '• y�'• :}Y S;, y , '. }' ,{.:;: �: {•;.';.; ;� ;•�; ;,Y�;�;y, • '
. ` R; {; :;i :•: j;J j ". ••' • {{ {••;� • S :0•SL' : {.';i :} `i , y R Y• /
- ••;� ' •• ;; :;:; } •• • • r }ii , •• :;ij }{ y , . ?•;:;4' • �. :R•;:yf:' :`;• 'Y�:;y {;S•�f {•, ••'•'jr� j' {••J:•j ` :R ' :; • 1
N-;�{:;' • S rj;J •:•:' ?:4.'r•• •, ' • R S }' • : •Y {':Rr• , ;S �:• •r SL; • P.' : •:;;; �::;'
• `• ,•}, � •., 'S;r' �.;• j { • R' :• y j .. 4 :} } }' R l.•• {R J .:; : }•;.': • 'r. ' •. •• •:S; •;•'j;}
' }} •, ;{{;';;.•;R.;.' riy :;•, r : r.:.; •j •1'_ • j ; • {;• -Xi S''{; •'• :Y.;: {:} S• '•:' yi j •',i'.;• •• ,• •,rr }, \
}.R • • •;;. • S .`.•,: y •. • {'' y, :: { ;�;: ;S9 { :•.•', •, j .
i>laK • • • R r: :J 1R, •t;•'{y.;;;'S• j ;,,,,. jY0'j; S{ :••,'• ylrl J • • SY. rJ " a ��• •
ti •',;,{. • r yy R Y .�• R }'y:R; ; R R. l : }fi::• r • ' ti:' L' R j •• J" :fi
„ S • }�;•�• }• -••;' •�'• { �S J� {.;r.•J. - S' • •. ': }' •• ,�; +rA;yR ;{•• ., •� �: 1'
.+ • • -� � �� •5 , : �; •y ; • :y }y'r�. l l i } l.Y • RR ,Ry J • •:M.} • •'r, • •' • ' • ••} .' •r , • : `
r • j „• S{ r• j • • „ •,•,.••,. • • S Y Y S {S;'. •' •• R S :•:• ;'''MY., �y:R'•R'•R� •R
•• ,•, y.J• "' {':, • y • "'• • • S {, • , j r' S ' •�. • ' `i };y{• yR {•'�•.., •' .y:•iR•. , r �:•,•yr• :•y
\ }? •; �'{.; {{?. r :L,, R ,,: .•,} •.S'}, . J : }•: y � }:. } }� . r :.: . .;�}� R } f ,y }�'�� • y. },. rl, • ,R'• r•;.•.�:JJ,
A t
� ;',.,' },�,. y }.;y� {} L ,;�::;y }• ;::: } ; : ;:yy;. .;.;� :'':: ;:{;:; :; :;:;. '' :• :':h , • �:• • • • 'y •• J R., y { { '{,: •,.•',,•''' .
..' ,, . , ,j yrrri Jr:• • � � • • „ "' • • • • • • ' :•:'' ti R,l • , •;� rs, 'r• y S •, � R,y, y .N�t � f , t_
S} ' • :: ••J. }`�. }.'.. �rrJi ti •j ;: ;'• ,;,: �•j ' f {• �;•4 • i •' R ••::; '•• ••• j �� { • • • Y:R;, '•,;;: {i i� `'
y;.;rY: :•: • ::;:tij {jj • :�'y4;•L j4 j },•� y V. y ' • "• •J� { r.:•; , ' :•:•, ' '•J: • r.' • •:•, ,,� •R: • •yy, • � j• �:': 7 •,;•' `�,.i �y ,,y {;•,J
-A .•: •. {ti :'..•.•..;. • R•"y,.rMy:•.•y:. b''j •',M1 ' 6 •R , R{ti•' •' .R'. .;.,. {.• '
• ,R ..•.L {;: ::' . , •S • r ••Y S, !,,� , • •, R R :•:`JJ }�� : }, ' y,.. ❖; y ,, , .. • R :,• ,R;. t • •S:r ?: /1j 1
•:•:. , • .'.•:. S', , R•.• .•lr: • 'rj ;' }yjY �{ �;: }•;i', R;r'•1�' . '"'RK, ..LR'.•.R 1 • R: • y •; , { { {{•:• : a
/t • S'.••Y •• Rh•,YO • S , AS R SR •• S S •:' • • • }:: •�''•{ ':': }: {•• • • }:;Yy. }r•
Nr
• y�.�'r W.
ti•.Y:;• } yy };.;. {
♦♦ • • ;Y::: yS' •: r S'P{ :''•�S • ,', ?' : }, Si tS • S ••;• •J • ' l' , • R,••',Si • {•:•i :';'{ '••• : {i;i :, {•i {• •. ,;•;,R,r • •.';' j •'; ::J� :'.'l R� • w •••• •• •�'
fi r.. • W j. , . y, , . },�y
Elm
y , • 'S , }R {Rj,• ::•} S� , •�•}� • i RS R R .,•, y; ,� }S,J• R4 � } :':• } : :•:y' t y `
R }R;.S f ' • • •`r:;i; •, •lr • { R' }L '• :1,1•: ' ;�:5, • R •••• i'i'. ' ;�• ;;;i;} • {},�,{.L,• , 'i;•} ••y' S • {i • SW EVE
•': • s+
L •• y: j r {J. \.,L;J j;;•;• :• }i':4} {bl •JASR' yy:jj }j •'•.R, •• :77. }j ;r' ' `Y i yr•} r' Y Y : • yi WW/.
i •; yj:.:Y:';.RR .S 'Y'•;;;� } �'L' S };. •:;rr� .; :•: R, L �;;r • , j j . jS {• Y•r .. • !j
J'r• •..R•.;•;d.;rfir :'411A•`'�.5•: {; ,• J jS ' };i j ;�S, {.r ', R • ,�, r,•;•:R iy.• •,� : • • .;r,:;i
• ••. j l .Y • • �l • SR;Y y • ;; •�,.ti :R�yiy {: • .`. RY •J: ,•,• {R, S • y':•,; • ;ti:. • � j:•;L L � ;•;{ :•RR;• {`:•:•:'; :• �, ••• •:•:•: � �►
.••� f .. .Y ` • j •• • •••• {• YJ. } {••{ ♦ r S • {R •' '�•':i r S ' : {'' :••, • • i {: ;• .;:. •: ,:, •'' • J •, • :, • J • R ,O'..;• ••• • •1
•• r ,l.• • • S • R R j ,R � • � +7
.•.S, j • , S, �;},:R„ : , yr1 j • : r S }':;•r'Y •••;•:•j'l•••.':••, , l R � }R •�Y. y' .,',.,r, a ':
w ;•,R}: •;` y.. {y l• {Rr • • :� {;1j.•.': • : y} '•• :•,4 Y '} ,;y} y Y• :Y. • ., •� :•;; :5 .'•,1r Y.j,Y
•'' i ?"�':•r, • .S•,•;••; • :ti ; � j• R , • {' 7•?r ' R • •,��. •. • •'• L • R, y' , , • R �.;5 J'• i .•. }.•' ... •
owes
:R;.1.;�,R.,} :''Y :: : ;•r• :;•,; :: {y y�.`�,{.,•} .' �,Y� •, 4 R. •: Jr y ,.;`. 1 �;. { •• f {';�; ?,,.• .;y�yy j''• :{ . y r:•:• :;., �•.
'•• J aR•j:'l'.:Y • .:,:. • y } ;• "�Y•'` •} • {� �:.'::• , i ; {;''ray ,�. ' . j:'L• • ,14R , ,Y:• T:;.;y� rj ;.y:;ti. },� • -•� •.. � .. �
• •.:R;. y...S } � . '';'. • d'1' • y . •ti {. , ".Yr; y •.S• :�•• •L • : ' ' :;:;•'•;i },y �.{ j, {.;y
• } r'' ' ' .. •, .� }''�: • Y''l •': •y •} ', •.. y: yyy 'A }R: :'4 }'y��; :tii {i : ?S•� ';;�'1 71 >tt rr
� � • Nj •.:;� •.'i4: :::Y • ' {;;;••j• r::}� :1'i�• y •,••�'' , • • . �: , S : � / .fN11R ,� �!•1L fl •11 �• � � ��, i�
,,•, • R, • •y i , R, ,• {, . i,•? �•:'iR •i y� � ••ijiS•i,' j ' . ,' � •• N • • • ,' ::..' ., ;;i;:;i;: • O
• � ' i;: • ;y {• •'�••' :;• :Y:•Y ;,R • S' ••' • y.Y�y'.,•�y'"••S;Ji:;', ;:;::•.T., ,1{' , .;':•• • . ,� •. v
• �� . ;;;,Y,•,;�',} '�R•R "''•. f}Y:; }R, r,;.;. L,j ..r,•j, j j :•., M•R 1
� 1 • •, •.. �R ti •�•• RS{ •• •' • R {• • S ;� }�;:},: }R,i Jyr'
/ � :•:{;�'�y L: {'•' .'. S R • "�R y 'fiG;Sy�. • , y' '.� • •'.y�:, • • •SRr {R
!M .� :R•'• '}•i:} "{;}{ 'rl.{ } R., • • S • S} •'•. r •N .
P ; ;;;• - .�S�i} Yy ti h • r}'�'R�l {'iR }:';:` ' y. ' ;.;�y {• Yi
LAKE
SPOON
.,........ p.... ....... • sa
leQAMIA6 --- • s ,�,�, '•� HIGHWAY 36
' 1 mss• • $ -
1 /
r'' r
s� 't• POSSIBLE OPEN SPACE
..�" t•• "do PROPOSED PLAT SITE t'
r: .r l
PROPERTY LINE MAP .
N
OPEN SPACE SITE *116
. 26
Attachment 9
„i 3
0 3!
to o
to
%0
S.78 To rA
-ebb a
r.
7z•t g
^�� 37 5k 323.10 34,E
f 97' 33 13
'. .. ,
y
3�"
413
,
to
%9 o i4 �
•w. C,
I ,
!
i
2 t.
3 so
�• l
t
l
2
(43)
1 s
o � e4.45 .74.s � tom) �' 4
o (.4.t) (40) `Ct�)
2 40'
o ( 77r �
..
M d «, . 4 `..
..: b �' 7r' ` ." 1 03• 5 19 (43) 0
16
2 �'
c
�' 4 '
S� 15. (4a.) ' 1 K
D
..
c o
10
^ 1
.
14
13 Z _'
12
-
dft 4w
\ 78
37
• �.
u , 1 oj
._....,. �...
I�'1
77
6
OLI
5 ,
DE M Q NTN
AV E
N
040
C� J O
0 91/
n 10 $2.73 72.i,S 9. 2
4
23 24 a
..
H 5 �
�8 _ � 6
loa ro a
f� 41
��• g(. �z BC.BS c� �i
8
7
;J
0 40
Co r3ro
2 )8C
3.ti2ac. ' -
(z:a ?b��
• 1 -50 ac.
43 `
3.00 ac
Ls , 14 16 1 4
o I y rte- Z 4 qq =4,. G� 07) �
IV* •� (12.12 at) _ ; 45a -
B ^ c C`S
� G � o �2.� o � ,
A
ROOKS
99' G' � 17 ' x
79 Z. �•• 4,
(33) (.41) ZI9 CL�) p
` 20'� 18 Tota I - 14 44= N
►: 2 3 : 22 21 a� m
�0 30 ,33 83. Z 73.89 7.5 2O5. 93 Maple-Leaf �riv -'In T1�eatrG
ac )
/2
10.00 11.47ac.)
3b 221 J�
S
N
�D
d nso
V
S.78 To rA
r.
•
y
1
N
2 40'
o ( 77r �
. 53 ec
b9 ac
37
• �.
t
N
040
C� J O
0 91/
f
.6 7 \
42�.97
9D
335
Q%1A IC
c
D oc
S N
PROPERTY LINE. MAR
PROPOSED VACATIONS 27
Attachment ,10
C
AUG
986 Demont Ave, East
Maplewood, Minn.
Au 11, 1994
Kenneth Roberts
Communit Developm'ent,Department
Cit of Maplewood
1830 E. Count Road B
Maplewood, Minn. 55109-2797
Mr. Roberts:
We are respondin to the proposal for the use of land surroundin
our communit b the Gon Corporation. We are not opposed to
the buildin of sin famil dwellin but we do have some
concerns/su that we would like to have considered.
Our first concern has to do the wetlands located on the land.
'The map was not ver clear, but we are hopin those areas would
not be tampered with and left intact. As y ou are probably aware,
it provides a home for several ' different t of water fowls.
In addition, our propert has a substantial amount water beneath
the house foundation. Durin and after rainfalls, our water pump
.runs continuously. We are afraid that if the present natural
-drainage s is -disturbed, we ma experience serious draina
problems.
our next concern has to do with the mature trees. located on the
land. Those trees not only help to maintain the- of the
air, but is also home to an abundance of wildlife. Including,
but not limited to owls and deer. We realize that some of the
trees will have to be sacrificed in order to build the homes.
However, it would be g reatl y appreciated if the cit could
require that a certain percenta of the trees remain on the
land.
Another concern has to do with access to the community. There
,appears to be onl two streets to gain access to the
neighborhood. This will mean that the traffic to reach the new
development will be routed throu the existin communit We
would like to see another street allowin access to the new homes
that would not route them throu Forest or C Streets.
28
Lastly, we would we like to.ensure that the lot sizes are kept
equivalent to the properties in Caregrove Meadows. Again due to
the quality of the map it was difficult to ascertain the new lot
sizes. In order to allow existing homeowners to maintain our
property values we would request that the lot sizes remain
consistent with the existing hones
Thank you for listening to our concerns. We can be reached at
4$6--0023 if further clarifications on our suggestions are needed.
incerely,
Ma cia and Walker Moore - Foster
29
Attachment 11
We. the homeowners of Carsgrove's Meadows and surrounding areas
strongly oppose Mapleleaf Estates as proposed for the following reasons:
1.) Extending Forrest beyond it's present ending point would forever
change the character of one of Maplewood's most beautiful neighborhoods.
Greatly increased traffic flow would diminish the safety of our
neighborhood in general not to mention unnecessarily putting our children
at far greater risk.
2.) Development of the entire tract of land would further the destruction
of habitat and wildlife and destroy some of the natural beauty of
Maplewood.
3.) The result of effectively doubling the number of homes in a small area
would increase the burden on our already overcrowded schools as well as
increase crime, and increase demand on public services such as police,
fine, and street maintenance. Increased water pollution would also stress
existing wetlands and surrounding Lakes.
The below signed residents would strongly support the development of
Mapleleaf Estates if the plan were to be improved. We firmly believe the
following refinements would help to maintain the character of the
existing neighborhood and still allow the developer to create a highly
marketable community.
1 .) -Leave Forrest exactly as is. Build another entrance to the
development at Gervais. This will lessen the negative impact on the
safety and character of the existing community.
2.) Rezone entire tract of land as R1 (as presently proposed).
3.) Reduce the number of new lots. This will reduce the negative
impact of higher density.
4.) leave "Open Space" or build a Community Park on proposed lots
9 -15 and on the end of Forrest (encourage community use only by not
having a parking lot). This would enhance the livability of Maplewood by
blending nicely with the existing parks along Spoon Lake and Keller Lake.
W R A/ AJ 95S 6 ,e5 c
30
.S d��k del
Sines# p�
4 -�'uu,�
kDrne&
CL
Cva�.�t
Cl
anc 66n n��
cklk
Attachment 12
i
D
DAY. way. b u-4.Q{ U , iut GnG� Ye t bs�r u� j l
L' e,;, c� �y.� 4-1 cu.Cen
ktA n,Foa '� vnc�.�n_Fac,,.. � smaCt
„i
O c
0
-UhC ,(nt /L-� iUa d 40 62
k.fi(a,c /� �n✓ eA.n.i /1e� �zm �ans09 -10 ue.
a u
NOWQ
- 2 00 �Cce� , �e� tr'u+ -t
itiva.rv�
luc� bft�
� cvn d ov m
tftia -r�- i�4 o-f wC aiittnd�
kAILLI
31
Attachment 11
N oiihernatr e Motel
2441 Hwy 61 St. Paul, MN 55109 (612) 484 -3336
1- 800 - 899 -7578 Reservations &Info. only Fax 484 -2063
We are afro against the projected development. All the ead�tin" Commercial
�y
ad' o' the ro development gill lose value. If any businesses were to make
p ) u p p
im rovements � along meet m ' . the city of jdaplewoods requirements, we will need to notify
p
our ne' hors 35 ft. from our petty. Cumntly, we wouldn't get any negative -feed back from
'O
an y of our ie%h bors, as our commercial business's won't hurt any of their properties. If this
p. P 8� ro through as projected, we will have 35 or more, residential properties to satisfy.
Homeowrners, once established, are not going to want: Noise, Isghts, Trucks, etc., etc. Those
thin that are of o ra a business. A Hew Business may find it easier to go else were,
� app Ix
Then to T to a residential home owner with their business designs, E�cpansion, and
ry ppease
rev lions. wing business's may eventually be required to meet the needs of the home owners
and residential guidelines, rather then fit the needs of the business itself. An owner building a
new business will not want residential owners to detenninc their fate.
The two homes on Jarvis are not marketable as residential now, if this proposal goes
through th ey will not be marketable as c:ommercia, for all the aforementioned reasons.
Another great con nc em -, is the Land that we have adjoining the proposed property. We
would not want any new development directing any drainage over our Property. My husband and
I have been hear for 6 years, through the wettest tunes, there hasn't been any water in that area,
and we don't want anyi
In respect to our thoughts for this property:
There should be a buffer zone next to the residential. Office buildings, Dr. clinics etc.
When our business won't disturb them, and there business won't disturb the residential. We agree
with the exist' zo Wrap . This buffer was well thought of from the city, to avoid future
�g �� p
zoning problems, like those that now exist. This corner is already a conglomeration of zoning
Sp
with residential homes overlooking loa ding docks,
91
I)An
32
The Friendly Place to Stay!
OAK RIDGE POND RENTALS
Attachment 1.4
P.O. BOX 10859
WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 551
A UCI. r:
(612) 433 -3621
FAX is 12 ) 433 -4017
August 11, 1994
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr. Kenneth Roberts, Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Response to Proposed Gonyea Company Development
Dear Mr. Roberts:
Thank you f or the information you sent August 1 regarding the proposed change of zoning in our
neighborhood.
As I stated ant Y
he enclosed survey, I object to the proposal from Gonyea Company. Our industrial park
building has tenants
who are manufacturers, wholesalers and service businesses. There is traffic on our
property and
it is very active. In the future, our main tenant has shown serious interest in having us build
an addit ' n to our buildi which would extend the building to the west, and right into the proposed new
velo ment. I expect we would have problems with neighbors complaining about our addition,
res�dent ai de � p p
noise traffic and building lights at night, and this is NOT a desirable situation.
Please ke e p me advised on this matter. I will strongly oppose any change in the Zoning for this
neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Charisse M. Hall
Property Manager
cmh
PS Please note our change in address:
James M. Mueliner
dba Oak Ridge Pond Rentals
P.O. Box 10859
White Bear Lake, M N 55110
33
Attachment 15
October 8, 1994
Mr, Kenneth Roberts
Associate Planner
C ity of Maplewood
.Dear Kenneth,
OCT ?
I attended the recent public hearing regarding the
Mapleleaf Estates de v g g proposed
e ]. opment .
I did not speak at the meeting, but I would like
comments with you to share
the following th the appropriate City personnel:
�.. I thought the presentation provided b Geoff
well done. Y f Olson was
2 As many stated at the meeting, g. am strongly opposed to
the extension of Forest street, and I am concerned about
the extension of Cyprus street due to the location of the
park,
ocat�
I agree that the City should evaluate access options ptlons to
east and the south
of the proposed development.
I am mainly opposed to the extension of Forest
because I feel the street
City does have other traffic routing
options for this development. I think that the .frontage
road to the east and Keller Parkway to the south could
feed much of the traffic into the new development.
Existing traffic is relatively light on the frontage
light
road, and very g on Keller Parkway south of the
proposed development as compared to County Road C and
Forest. There is very little residential development
along these roads so more P ent
o e traffic should not be of
concern as it would be on County C and Forest.
I agree that the City should explore an access r
r oad from
the East, perhaps running thru the area of the existing
drive in theater. I also support the access ss road off of
Keller Parkway from the south.
34
Concern was expressed over how an access road from the
east would be paid for. I would like to k
now what the
incremental cost of such a road would be, and how it
might,be paid for, Does the Cit have the abilit to
spend more on such a road in
recognition of the hi
.
tax base associated with,the existin and proposed
development? Could the neighborhood pa for it?
If possible, I would like to receive a cop the traffic
plan for the Phase I developm e nt, and I would like to
receive other traffic related information with respect to
Phase II as it becomes available.0
30 Someone on Brooks court expressed concern about excessive
tree removal on th lots to the South of Brooks.court due
to the gradin planO I got the impression that trees ma
be removed to satisf city ordinancer when in fact the
could remain with some minor deviations from polic I
would encoura the cit to spend time and mone
evaluatin how more of the trees could be saved, while
still providin for acceptable draina etc,
4., Naturall I hope that the City can acquire the land
discussed for open space.
5e With this additional development, it seems reasonable
that more funds will be added for the park. I would like
to see :a lighted tennis court, and was encoura to hear
that the City ma build one.
Thank y ou for y our consideration of .these points.
Sin erel
i nere
Jef and Heidi Severson and famil
926 Palm Circle
Maplewood, MN 55109
797-3404-work
35
894 Connor Court
Maplewood, MN 55109
October 19, 1994
OCT 0 W EP-i
2 0 X994 � D
Mayor and City Council
Maplewood City Council
l 1830 Count Road 6
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council,
I attended the last planning commission meeting at which the new development
for the area south of Count. Road C and West of 61 was being discussed. As
County
a resident of this area I have a couple of concerns that I feel are important for
you and the council to account for in the approval process for the
development.
I strong feel there has been inadequate consideration given to access to the
new development from the east. Gervais street is a prime access area to the
development but i not being given consideration. if you review . the comments
of the p lanning staff the reason given for not considering Gervais were that
trucks use that road and it would not be proper for a residential street.
There should be absQlutely .. n that the street could not be
used for both the residential and the bus iness. If the business use of
the p Y street comp lies to City ordinances both there is no reason why the street
could not be used as an access street to the new addition. We need to use the
already we
roadways have in lace rather than building new. An access point
Y p
from Gervais wou reduce the increased load on Cypress(by our only
neighborhood park) and the increased load on Forest.
Finally, we must be certain that adequate drainage is provided for along
Cyp b the ark. Just this past week with our nominal am ount of rain,
Yp Y p
Cypress was flooded and City crews had to come out and open up the street.
he are is to its limit in handling water run off. Any Clearly t 9 planned additions
to the nds will push them beyond their limits and cause an already muddy
p
park to become unusable for the people in the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ul
Mark D. Larson
3s�
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
Attachment 16
WHEREAS, Dennis Gonyea applied for a change to the City's land use plan. This change is
from R -1 S (small lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -1 (single dwellings).
WBER.EAS, the City staff is proposing to drop the collector designation on Forest Street.
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property south of Brooks Court between Forest and
Cypress Streets north of Gervais Avenue in .Section 9, Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 3, 1994. The City staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve the plan amendment.
2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on + , 1994. They
considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
change for the following reasons:
1. The developer is proposing to develop the site for single dwellings.
2. This change would reduce the allowable intensity and traffic from this site.
3 The R -1 classification would be more compatible with the surrounding homes than the
present classifications.
4. Forest Street Would no longer serve as a major collector street.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on
, 1994.
36
Attachment 17
RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, Dennis Gonyea applied for a change in the zoning map from F (farm
residential), R -1S (small lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light manufacturing) to R -1 (single
dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property south of Brooks Court between Forest and
Cypress Streets north of Gervais Avenue. The legal description is:
The East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29 North,
Range 22 West , Ramsey County, Minnesota except the North 396 feet thereof and except the
Y
South 290.4 feet of the East 240 feet thereof and except the South 135 feet lying West of the East
240 feet thereof, and
Lots 4 through 6, Block 1; Lots 1 through 14, Block 3; vacated Brooks Avenue, Meadow Lane
and the vacated Conner Avenue, all in Peters Addition, according to the recorded plat, Ramsey
County, Mn.
and
The North twenty -four (N. 24) rods of the East half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of
the Northwest �
uarter 1/2 of E 1/2 of SE 1/4 of NW 1/4); and that part of the East half of the
q
East half of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter ( E 1/2 of E 1/2 of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4)
described as: beginning at the SW corner thereof, thence East to the Southeast corner thereof
g g
thence. North along the East line thereof Four (4) rods, thence Southwesterly to the place of
be g innin g , all in Section Nine (9), Township Twenty -nine (29), Range Twenty -two (22), subject
to easements of record including agreement in 41 Misc. 574, and Southwest quarter of Southeast
q uarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29 North, Range 22 West, Ramsey
County, Minnesota, and The South 3 21.27 feet of the East 199.10 feet of the Southeast quarter of
the Southwest q carter of Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29 North, Range 22 West,
Ramsey County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS,. the history of this change is as follows:
1. On October 3, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the change.
2. On October , 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners.
The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written
statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff
and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
37
1 The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning . code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of neighboring
property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property
adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community,
where applicable, and, the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and
economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewers,
police and fire protection and schools.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1994.
38
Attachment 18
VACATION RESOLUTION
WBEREAS, Dennis Gonyea, representing Gonyea Corporation, Inc., .applied for the vacation
of the following described streets:
1. That part of Connor Avenue east of the east right -of -way line of Cypress Street, all of
Meadow Lane between Connor Avenue and Brooks Avenue, and all of Brooks Avenue
between Meadow Avenue the vacated Cypress Street as dedicated as part of the
Peters Addition in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22
2. The 16.5 -foot -wide undeveloped publ road between the east side of Meadow Lane and
the east side of the proposed plat site that divides PIN 09- 29 -22 -24 -0001 as noted in
Book 636, Page 556.
3. The west 77 feet of the Gervais Avenue right -of -way that is west of the west 1/2 of the
east 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9 Township 29, Range 22.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. On October 3, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve this vacation.
2. On October 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a.notice to the abuttin g p p �y ro a owners. The
Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the Cit y staff and
Planning Conunission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to
the following abutting properties:
1. Lots 1 -14, Block 3 of Peters Addition
2. Lot 6, Block 1 of Peters Addition
3. The North 396 feet of part. of east 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 East of Peters Addition
and also a triangular tract adj . on N being in and measuring 66 feet on the east line of the east
1/4 of NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 all in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22.
4. The south 10 acres of the west 1/2 of the east 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29,
Range 22
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
vacations for the following reasons:
39
MW
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build streets on these rights -of -way.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
This vacation is subject to the City retaining a 25400t -wide utility easement over the east end of
Gervais Avenue.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , , 1994.
40
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,, Dennis Gonyea applied for a variance from the subdivision ordinance.
AREAS, this variance applies to the proposed cul- de-sac at the east end of Demont Avenue.
WBEREAS, Section 30- 8(b)(3) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a right -of -way diameter
Of 120 feet for cul -de -sacs.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a diameter of 100 feet.
WHEREAS, this requires a variance of twenty feet.
Vf WREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On October 3, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this
variance.
2: On October 24, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff published a notice in
the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave
everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also
.considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - descried variance
for the following reasons:
L The variance would save part of a wetland.
2. The City Engineer stated that the cul -de-sac would be large enough for snow : plowing.
This variance is subject to the developer platting the west half of the site. If he sells the west half for open
space, Demont Avenue must be connected to Cypress Street.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1994.
41
Attachment '20
MAPLELEAF ESTATES PROPOSED SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS
AUGUST, 1994
We, the homeowners of Carsgrove Meadows and surrounding areas . strongly
feel there should be modifications made to the Mapleleaf Estates proposed
site plan before we can fully support that plan.
The existing plan is not acceptable for the following reasons:
7.) Extending Forest Street beyond it's present ending point would forever
change the character of one of Maplewood's most beautiful neighborhoods.
Greatly increased traffic flow would diminish the safety of our
neighborhood in general, not to mention unnecessarily putting our children
at - afar greater risk.
2. } Development of the entire tract of land would further the destruction
of habitat and wildlife and destroy some of the natural beauty of
Maplewood.
3. The result of effectively doubling the number of homes in a small
would increase the burden on our already overcrowded schools as well as
e crime and increase demand on
increase public services such as police, P
f e,
it and street maintenance. Increased water pollution would also stress
existing wetlands and surrounding lakes.
The below signed residents would fuDly support the development of
Mapleleaf Estates only if the below mentioned modifications are made to
the proposed plan We firmly believe the following refinements would
help to maintain the character of the existing neighborhood and still allow
the developer to create a highly marketable community.
1 . j Leave Fo.cest Street exactly as is. Build another entrance to the
development at Gervais. This will lessen the negative impact on the
safety and character of the existing community.
2.) Rezone entire tract of land as R1 (as presently proposed).
3.) Reduce the number of new lots. This will reduce the negative
impact of higher density. .
42
4. ) Leave "o p en Space" or build a community Park on proposed lots
9 -15 and on the end of Forrest (encourage community use only by not
having a parking
lot). This would enhance "the livability of Maplewood by
`
blending nicely 9 ni l with the existing parks along Spoon Lake and Keller Lake.
A "buffer" in this location would also help to maintain the character of the
existing community.
43
I 0
�i
NOR
t
ltd � • ='
a r I CA mu
• a • .
athf*��.'
1
} sk
is .... -a.
.�.�_ . All �.
S WAM
e �►j �
�i
r iy r
.+aod
�ie>u ss�°
kit saw
, -
I % "-. ��� tee• r'
lb
e� . ■rr - _
DIY
Nor ro
l
M„�t _ •
am* �1
vwni $.call
dtw/rDw • waft
NAME ADDRESS
2 Z - 1 !.,
3
4
5
9511 l�2cc�fw� �L�c4`�'
m 9 Mr., 4 i Wo
`� 45
71
7
q-11
.8 (000
g-
10 vr�
ok
CL
1
1 4 (,t� n W44--%
C,
cr- V�
m 9 Mr., 4 i Wo
`� 45
71
z,
j Ais Aqm
. �s'ti �aeE
A
23
�l.r.��� � I
ZSY6 �e,t S },
za
�
2 6 51.
25
jJ7
Y 26 ' Al
�
� l/
30
a
ISO
airs �� �•
s
mommmosom
3.3
34
li-
o26
36
.1/� '
oZ 6.3V
37
� i
38
n ✓Pnn . _ Pi d-C`.
C � � � I � i V^
46
NAME ADDRESS
NA ME ADDRESS
40
41
1/ '
v�
c�
WA
I _
I
50
ss i/L;JAM
54
55
56 :i�/ Cft
47
,a � -u+.�E o.cuc�P Co.
74 C) L
75
76 /J c� ti'p G
s
NAME
ADDRESS
v
s,
,icy
All
sz
Via .ec�
30
63
F Sr 6 /�A t/k � T.
gnomon
d PA L AA c T.
.65
mom
66
68 OiW(.r�
✓�� %���h.
69
��vr�
� �-�-o-
� In �n C7 R Q��✓ ✓1
70
re
72
Jet
top, �, c
,a � -u+.�E o.cuc�P Co.
74 C) L
75
76 /J c� ti'p G
s
— r
Ulm
s
w
NAME
ADDRESS
»
rn
78
4 00"
1000,
79
AAl
6�3
60 i
MI
8,
-
9f�
8
82
� � `
93S Ma v .�
83
cm cop.-L'
1 1 (MCM 1
8 4
TA
7 Mu
!� E e
will
.:97
/,,1
— r
Ulm
s
w
NAME
ADDRESS
96
AV 0
98
v
v /
1 00
l
�00 J �.L1
1
OF
�-��� < < _' X11
/ •
1 04
r
� � / � t, �
P 4 7 ' l t ,
� I •
,
R osom�
10 r
1
•
•► .�. ►
1109
c1clo too- P
i
t
/ I
/� r •
1� �+� �1 ��/ .�� !►.
1 I� 7
NAME ADDRESS
115 51 Fipf.& S 1
122
124 �
125
126
op
130 �- Z sow �►
0
,3 1 1 I 2 _
*7, 1 32 f vr
133
J
51
NAME
ADDRESS
,sa
f �rre � l/c,�.�
a Kiln- p I
,as
yo
136
K d
10 1 - 37
138
CZ t/, � �,�
....,'
a'� S oJ
139
1A0�'
141
ell
'(04
142
L'v� --e� -f�".
,6- �- �.:a.� -�,e�
,� sa�{ K�xk�- Pk�.
143
�U���'1
�- �%�n�ioV1
zcallo
O r
152
52
150
151
MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
October 3, 1994
7 P.M.
City Hall Council Chambers
1830 East County Road B
1. k Call to Order
Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
IL Ro11Vall
Commi ' oner Lester Axdahl
Commiss ner Lorraine Fischer
Conamissio r Jack Frost
Commissione evin Kittridge
Commissioner ve Kopesky
Commissioner M Martin
Commissioner Gary . eazson
Commissioner Willi Rossbach
Commissioner Todd S ell
Commissioner Marvin Si undik
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
APPROVAL OF MINUTE
A. September 19, 1994
Commissioner Fischer
submitted.
val of the minutes of September 19, 1994 as
Commissioner Hfarson seconded
es- -all
The moti passed.
IV. APPRO L OF AGENDA
Co 'ssioner Fischer moved approval of the agenda as su itted.
ommissioner Sigmundik seconded Ayes - -all
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Mapleleaf Estates (Forest and Cypress Streets)
Planning Commission
Minutes of 10 -03 -94 2
Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered questions from the
Commission. In addition to the four requests listed in the report, Mr. Olson stated the
developer is also asking for a right -of -way variance to allow a 100 -foot rather than the
required 120 -foot diameter cul -de -sac at the end of Demont Street because of a small
wetland there. Mr. Olson discussed how the Maplewood Open Space Plan could
affect this development area. He. mentioned the drainage plan should be adequate
when easements are obtained and also that Kohlman Park is scheduled for upgrading
in 1995 which should serve the entire area.
Secretary Olson stated that he asked the developer to phase this project and table
development of a portion until the city makes. a decision on open space. The
developer agreed to this request and will allow the city, on the second phase, an
extension to the state law that requires action on a plat within 120 days of application.
Mr. Olson revised the staff recommendation to include approval of a variance from
120 to 100 feet for the cul -de -sac on Demont Street and also approval of the
preliminary plat, but only for the area including Block 1, Lots 1 -17 of Block 2,
Blocks 3 through 4, and Lots 1- 8 of Block 5. Mr. Olson also recommended the
balance of the preliminary plat be tabled until the first Planning Commission meeting
in January.
Chairperson Axdahl opened the public hearing for comments from the public. Larry
Olson of Midwest Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers, the engineers on the project,
answered questions and stated that a mitigation plan, to be approved by the Ramsey
Washington Metro Watershed Board, would be prepared. Dennis and Tom Gonyea,
the developers, were also present. Jim Traeger, 2612 Forest Street, spoke about the
wetlands and expressed opposition to this development. Mark Peters, 948 Brooks
Court, spoke against the project. Don Huot, 988 East County Road C, was concerned
about increased traffic on County Road C. John Swenson, 2595 Cypress Street,
questioned the engineer about the additional traffic and water problems on Cypress.
Rita Huot, 999 East County Road C, spoke against the development. Dr. Steve
Kuslich, a property owner in the area, discussed various aspects of the proposal.
Mark Warner, 990 Connor Avenue, asked Mr. Larry Olson about a wetland survey
site visit on April 28, 1994 and was concerned about several issues. Kathy
Kornmann, 982 Connor Avenue, spoke in favor of opening up the service road for
the new development. Al Carlson, 946 Connor Avenue, asked about the grading and
removal of trees. Mary Johnson, 978 Brooks Court, also questioned the removal of
trees. Dick Seppala, 2462 Forest Street, spoke against the project. Diane Carlson, 946
Connor Avenue, asked about the repair of Gervais Avenue. Gene Lund, corner of
Highway 61 and Gervais, spoke about Gervais Avenue reconstruction. Jim
Planning Commission
Minutes of 10 -03 -94 3
Wahlstrand, 972 Brooks Court, suggested alternate routes for traffic. Dave
Kornmann, 982 Connor Avenue, requested that traffic be routed to Gervais Avenue.
Theresa Huot, 988 East County Road C, spoke of traffic and water roblems in the
P P
area. Mark Larson, 894 Connor Court, asked for clarification of the proposed cul -de-
sac and commented on the traffic and drainage.
Andy Zuercher, representing the property owner of 2483 Highway 61, asked about
the buffer zone. Judy. Schenian, 2550 Forest Street, spoke against the development.
P g P
Peter Dey, 966 Brooks Court, preferred that the area be developed for open space.
Dennis Larson, manager of the Maple Leaf Drive -In Theater, explained the theater
driveway and spoke of the view in the area. Joe Varberg, 960 Brooks Court,
suggested that the plans be reconsidered to address citizen concerns. Pat Jondahl, 93 8
Demont Avenue, also wanted further study done on the plan. Jerry Herrin er, Maple
g P
Leaf Drive In Theater (fee owners of the property), spoke for the development. John
Wieremann, 955 Brooks Court, asked about the change from a through street to a cul-
de -sac on Demont Street and questioned the capacity of the wetlands. Bob Blaufuss,
962 East Demont was concerned with traffic -issues but favored the rezonin g to R -1.
Dennis Gonyea, the developer, explained that certain tree species are not counted.
Since there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Kopesky, a resident of the area for many years, spoke about traffic and
drainage on Cypress Street. Commissioner Pearson asked if cul -de -sacs could be built
on Forest Street so it would not be a through street. Secretary Olson stated that two
means of ingress and egress are required to a development. Commissioner Fischer
questioned the traffic count on County Road C. Ken Haider, Director of Public
Works, responded that it was 2550 average daily traffic at County Road C and about
Cypress Street according to a 1993 traffic count. The Commission also discussed the
feasibility of tabling the project and requesting additional information.
Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission table the project, and
direct staff to come back with some answers to egress and fin ther information on
open space.
There was no second to the motion.
The Commission discussed the requirements of the shoreland ordinance as it applied
to lots in this development. They also questioned traffic on Gervais Avenue near the
warehouse area.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council:
Planning Commission
Minutes of 10 -03 -94 4
A. Adopt the resolutions changing the land use plan and zoning map from R -1 S
(small lot single dwellings) and M -1 (light industrial) to R -1 (single dwellings).
The resolution also drops the major collector designation. for Forest Street. This
. change is for the Mapleleaf Estates plat. In addition to the findings required by
the Code, this change is for the following reasons:
1. The developer is proposing to develop the site for single dwellings.
2. This change would reduce the allowable intensity and traffic from this site.
3. The R -1 classification would be more compatible with the surrounding
homes than the present classifications.
4. Forest Street would no longer serve as a major collector Street.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Fischer, Sandell, Rossbach,
Pearson, Frost
Nays -- Sigmundik, Kopesky, Kittridge
The motion passed.
Commissioner Rossbach further moved the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council:
B. Adopt the resolution vacating the undeveloped street rights -of -way -(Connor
Avenue east of Cypress Street, Meadow Lane, Brooks Avenue, the 16.5 -foot-
wide undeveloped public road and the west end of Gervais Avenue). The City
should vacate these street rights -of -way because:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build streets on these rights -of -way.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
This vacation is subject to the City retaining a 25- foot -wide utility easement over
the east end of Gervais Avenue.
Commissioner Kopesky seconded Ayes- -all ,
The motion passed.
Pla F Commission
Minutes of 10 -03 -94 5
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission:
C. Table the request to vacate the utility easement that would be on the property line
of Lots 7 8 and 9 Block 6 of the ro osed plat until January 23, 1995
p p
Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes - - all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the PI 9 Commission recommend the City
Council:
D. Adopt the resolution approving a cul -de -sac width variance for a cul -de -sac at the
end of the existing Demont Avenue for the following reasons:
1. The variance would save part of a wetland.
2. The City Engineer stated that the cul -de -sac would be large enough for
snow - plowing.
Commissioner Frost seconded Ayes- -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Rossbach moved that the Planning Commission recommend City
Council:
E. Approve the following parts of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary minary plat (received
b the City on July 26,1994): Block 1; Block 2, Lots 1 -17; Block 3; Block 4,
y ..
Lots 1 -3 and Block 5, Lots 2--8. Table the remaining parts of the plat until
January 23 1995. Before the City ouncil approves the final plat, a developer
ty
shall complete the following conditions:
1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or
contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public
improvements and meet all City requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
C. Pay the City for the cost of traffic- control and street identification
Plug Commission
Minutes of 10 -03 -94 6
signs.
d, Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer
easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall
state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or .dumping.
e. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries.
f. Have NSP .install street lights in three locations, primarily at street
intersections. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to
the City Engineer's approval.
g. Construct Demont Avenue, east of Cypress Street, after the City
decides how much open space they will buy.
2. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and
overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include in the developer's
agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed
before final plat approval.
3 . * Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans.
These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree,
trail and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information
for each home site.
(2) Include contour information for the land that the street
construction will disturb.
(3) Show sedimentation basins as required by the watershed board.
C. The drainage plan shall show area drain catch basins between Lots 5
and 10, Block 3 and dedicate necessary easements for these drains and
pipes.
d. Provide stormwater storage and/or an off -site outlet pipe between
�
Planning Commission
Minutes of 10-03-94 7
Outlots A and B, based on a drainage study done by the developer's
engineer. The City Engineer shall approve the exact location, capacity
P ty
and outlet for this storage. If the City requires more pond capacity, the
developer may have to drop lots. The lots shall meet the Shoreland
requirements.
e. Provide adequate stormwater capacity for the wetlands on Lots 19 and
26, Block 2. The developer's engineer shall provide a drainage study
to determine adequate capacity, The City Engineer shall approve the
exact location, capacity and outlet for these. If the City requires more
pond capacity, the developer may have to drop a lot(s).
f. The tree plan shall show the size, species and location of any trees that
the developer will plant as replacement trees.
4. Show the following changes on the final plat:
a. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the
final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and
rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines.
b. Change Street C to Demont Avenue and change Street D to Adele
Street.
C. Drainage easements for drainage areas and wetlands that this project
would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that will be
south of Lot 19, Block 2.
d. Drop Lots 1,2 or 3 from Block One or channel the drainage between
outlots A and B through a drainage pipe.
e. If the City buys the west half of the site for open space, the developer
should connect Demont Avenue to Cypress Street. If this connection is
made, the developer should redesign the Demont Avenue/Cypress
Street intersection with a four -way design. If the City has not decided
about the open space purchase when the developer is ready to final
plat, the developer shall show Lot 1, Block 5 and Lot 4, Block 4 as as
an outlot. The outlot shall be large enough for two lots and a cul -de-
sac.
5. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the Watershed
District.
P1. g Commission
Minutes of 10 -03 -94 8
6-* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer. These shall include:
a. Give the City wetland easements over the wetlands. These . easements
Ulm cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet surrounding a
wetland. The easement shall prohibit any building or structures within
twenty feet . of the wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling or dumping
within ten feet of the wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose
of this easement is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from
homeowners' fertilizer and to protect the wetland habitat from
residential encroachment.
b. Drainage easements for the off -site drainage areas and wetlands that
this project would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that
will be south of Lot 19, Block 2.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may
waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading
permit or approves the final plat.
Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes -- Fischer, Sandell, Rossbach, Pearson,
Sigmundik, Kopesky, Frost
Nays -- Axdahl, Kittridge
The motion passed.
kcretary Olson noted that the Maplewood City Council will he item on
ONt 24, 1994.
B. Conditional'b4e Permit: Goodrich Dome (Van Street and Ripley Avenue)
Ken Roberts, Associa lanner, prese the staff report and directed the
PlanningCommission to s o e conditional use and the use of the property.
Fred Paul, representing Kels terprises, answered questions and assured the
Commission that the fa ' wou a paying various taxes. Bill DeWitt of Kelsey
Enterprises, Greg , Director of sey County Parks and Recreation, Kevin
Finley, Direct f Operations for Ramsey unty Parks, and Gary Hook of Kraus
Anderson a contractor, were also present to wer questions. The applicant
prese a sketch of the proposed building. The ission discussed the
appearance of the building and its suitability to this lo c ' on.
4 *%.3
Planning Commission -8-
Minutes of 10 -17 -94
A. Representative for the October 24 Council Meeting: Commissioner Rossbach said he
uId attend this meeting.
B. Represen iv for the November l4 Council Meeting: l re was a conflict as to
which comma 'oner is scheduled to attend this meeting. Ken Roberts, Associate
Planner, will chec a schedule and clarify it forfthe next meeting.
C. Approval of mutes:
Commissioner Fischer moved
submitted. /
3, 1994
yal of the minutes of October 3, 1994,, as
Commissioner Fro seconded
r
�tion assed.
,� P
Ayes -- dahl, Fischer, Frost, Kopesky,
Pearson, Ro Bach, Sandell, Sigmundik,
Abstentions -- Martin, ompson
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission reconsider the Mapleleaf
Estates preliminary plat.
Commissioner Kopesky seconded Ayes - -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the following
clarification of their approval of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat. Item E. of the
motion, on page 5 of the minutes, shall be clarified as follows: Item E. shall read:
"Approve the following parts of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat (received by
the City on July 26,1994): Block 1; Block 2, Lots 1 -17; Block 3; Block 4, Lots 1 -3,
and Block 5, Lots 2 -8, hereafter referred to as Phase I." Item E., I., a., page 5, shall
read: "Complete all grading for drainage, complete all public improvements and meet
all city requirements for Phase I." Item E., 1., g. on page 6 shall be deleted in its
entirety. Item E., 2., page 6, shall read: "The developer shall complete all grading for
public improvements and overall site drainage for Phase I. Item E., 4., e., on I page 7 of
the minutes, shall be deleted in its entirety.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Kopesky,
Pearson, Rossbach, Sandell, Sigmundik
OWWL
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Moratorium on Clinics
DATE: December 2, 1994
INTRODUCTION
11 . I
1cti ohk_ = b counoll u
Endorsed...,
Modified.
eced,
The moratorium on c ' 'cs expires on December 12, 1994. The Council should decide whether to
extend or end the moratorium.
BACKGROUND
On November 8, 1993, the City Council established a moratorium on new or expanding clinics
until February 28, 1994.
On February 28, the Council extended the moratorium until April 25, 1994.
On April 25, the Council extended the moratorium until September 12, 1994.
On September 12, 1994, the Council extended the moratorium until December 12, 1994.
DISCUSSION
The moratorium's purpose was to give the City time to complete a broader study of commercial
uses around residential neighborhoods. The Planning Commission has completed this study and
submitted it to the City Council. They recommended that the City Council make no changes to
clinics, and end the moratorium on new or expanding clinics. The Director of Public Safety told
me that there have been no significant problems with the methadone clinic on White Bear Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
If the Council wants to study the commercial property study before making a decision, they
should extend the moratorium until they have time to do this. Otherwise, they should end the
moratorium on new or expanding clinics.
p:miscelUC!&.gwo
Z -3
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Wetland Ordinance
DATE: December 6, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Action by Council - :
Endorse
Modifie
Raj 60te
Date
The -City Council requested a wetland setback ordinance. I requested the assistance of the Phalen
Chain of Lakes Watershed Committee. They prepared the attached ordinance. A representative
Will be at the meeting.. The ordinance requires minimum buffer zones and building setbacks
around wetlands. and streams. The ordinance would prohibit . any mowing, cutting, filling or
dumping within the buffer zone. The b,ufferzo'ne width would vary depending on the quality of
the wetland. The Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed Board is currently working on
classifying and mapping the wetlands in the City.
RECOMMENDATION
Refer this ordinance to the Planning Commission.
p:ord/wetlandl .gwo
Attachment: draft ordinance
A MODEL PROTECTION ORDINANCE
DRAFT
SECTION 1. Findings, Purposes
Wetlands serve a variety of beneficial functions. Wetlands maintain water quality, reduce
C )
flooding and erosion, provide food and habitat for wildlife, prov open space and are an
integml part of the City's environment. Wetlands are an important physical, educational,
ecological, - aesthetic, recreational and economic asset to the City. They are critical to the City's
health safety, and g eneral welfare. Surrounding development may degrade, pollute, accelerate
the in of or eli minate wetlands. Regulating land use around wetlands is therefore in the public
� g
interest. _
Streams are also significant elements of the City's hydrologic system. Streams connect
tY am
wetlands and lakes, provide food and habitat for wildlife, provide open space, and are an
integral Part City of the Ci 's environment. Like wetlands, streams are an important physical,
educational, ecological, aesthetic, recreational and economic asset to the City. Surrounding
may development degrade, flute, or damage streams, and in turn, degrade other surface waters
P Y � Po
do�wnstre.am. Re ula+ land use around streams is therefore in the public interest.
g g
g
(b) The v areas that surround wetlands and streams, called "buffers", are integral
to maintaining the valuable functions many wetlands and streams perform. Buffers reduce the
imp acts of surrounding development and land use on wetland and stream functions by stabilizing P g P
soil to revent erosion by stormwater; filtering suspended solids, nutrients, and harmful
P
substances; and moderating water level fluctuations during storms. Buffers also provide essential
habitat for feedin g, roosting, g g breedin and rearing of yo ung, and cover for safety, movement
and thermal P rotection for many species of birds and animals. Finally, buffers reduce the
adverse impacts. of human activities on wetland and stream habitats by blocl ng nose and glare
from artificial lights reducing sediment and nutrient runoff, and reducing disturbance from
dumped trampling. debris, cut vegetation, and ampling. Requiring buffers recognizes that wetland and
stream quality and function are related to the surrounding upland.
(c) The purposes of this ordinance are as follows:
1. To p reserve the beneficial functions of wetlands and streams by regulating the
surrounding land use.
2. To stabilize the soil around wetlands and streams to P revent storm water erosion.
3. To protect surface waters from pollution.
4. To filter, suspended solids, nutrients, and harmful substances from reaching wetlands,
streams, and downstream surface waters.
5. To reduce human disturbances of wetlands and streams by providing a visual and
physical transition from surrounding yards.
Y
6. To prevent flooding and the costs of reclaiming water quality.
7. To P rotect beneficial plants, wildlife habitat, and unique, mile, and valuable elements
of the environment including wildlife, rare species, and their habitats.
8. To educate the P ublic, including appraisers, owners, potential buyers or developers, to
the development limitations of wetlands, streams and associated buffers.
SEMON 2. Definitions.
The following words shall have the following meanings:
Alteration: Any human - induced action which adversely impacts the existing condition of a
wetland or
stream buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to, grading, filling, dredging,
*0
dramn , i
g nundating, cutting, pruning, topping, clog, relocating or removing vegetation,
applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxic substance, discharging pollutants
except stormwater, pig, construction, . application of gravel, -modifying for surface water
purposes
and other human activity that adversely impacts the existing vegetation,
any ty
hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitat. Alteration does not include walling, passive recreation,
fishing, plantings that enhance native vegetation or other similar activities.
Average buffer width: The average width of a buffer within a. single development, lot or
phase.
Clearing: The cutting or removal of vegetation.
Enhancement: An action which increases the ecological functions, values or integrity of a
wetland, stream or buffer.
Mitigation: The use of the following actions that are listed in descending order of preference:
(1) Minimizing. impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid
or reduce impact.
(2) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the wetland. buffer.
(3) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by prevention and maintenance operations
during the life of the actions.
(4) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing or providing substitute buffer land.
(5) Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures.
Native vegetation: Vegetation comprised of tree, shrub, grass or other plant species which are
indigenous to the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area and which reasonably could have been expected
to naturally occur on the site. Native vegetation does not include noxious weeds.
2
Restoration: The actions taken to return a wetland, stream or buffer or other vegetative
community to a condition similar to its stability, functions and values before settlement of the
area as closely as possible.
Strum
: Those areas where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed. A defined
channel or bed is an area which demonstrates clear evidence of the passage of water.
Stream buffer: land that is adjacent to a stream and within the boundary described by this
ord
' . All. buffers shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark as identified in the
field or, if that cannot be determined, from the top of the bank.
Variance: A deviation from the standards of this ordinance that are not specifically allowed.
Vegetation: An o plant life rowing at, below or above the soil surface.
eg Y � P g _
Wetland buffer or buffer: Land that is in du.wt drainage to a wetland within the boundary
described by this ordinance. All buffers are measured outward from the wetland edge.
Wetland ease ment: A desig area that includes the wetland or buffer where disturbance
from mowin g, cutting, , and similar activities are excluded.
Wetland edge: d ed The line delineating he outer edge of a wetland. This line shall be established
g
by using
the EWgra M an f r Id n Delineatin Juri di tional wetl ds dated
10 198 9, and jointly ublished b the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S.
January P Y
Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Arm} Corps of Engineers and the U. Soil Conservation
Such line must be verified the Service. S by a pplicable watershed board.
Wetland functions: The natural processes performed by wetlands and include .functions which
are important in facilitating food chain production, providing habitat for nesting, rearing and
resting sites for aquatic, terrestrial or avian species, maintaining the availability and quality of
water such as purifying water, acting as a recharge and discharge areas for groundwater aquifers
and moderating surface water and storm water flaws as well as performing other functions
including but not limited to those set out in US. Army Corps of Engineers regulations at 33
C.F.R. Section 320.4(b)(2)(1988)0
Wetlands: Those areas of the City that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water
at a frequency and .duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do
support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.
Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. (Army Corps of Engineers
Regulation 33 CFR 328.3 (1988). Where the vegetation has been removed or substantially
altered, a wetland shall be determined by the presence or evidence of hydric or organic soil, as
well as other documentation of the previous existence of wetland vegetation such as aerial
photographs.
3
(1) Class 1 wetlands: Wetlands. assigned the Unique /Outstanding rating in . the Ramsey-
g
Washin ton Metro Watershed District Wetlands Inventory, 1995. Class 1 wetlands are
those with conditions and functions most highly susceptible to human impacts, are most
unique, g community have highest communi resource significance such as rare species habitats, and
q
similar characteristics:
(2) Class 2 wetlands: High Value wetlands that are relatively undisturbed, with conditions
and functions that are susceptible to human impacts, are relatively. large and connected
to other wetlands or waterways, and may contain locally significant or rare wetland
h'Pes•
(3) Class 3 wetlands: Wetlands whose functions include Wildlife Habitat Value, that is,
provide a diversity of habitats, and are of sufficient size and connected to other wetland .
or upland habitats to provide wildlife habitat.
(4) Class 4 wetlands: Moderate Value wetlands that have been impacted by human activities,
are less susceptible to :further impacts• than Class 1 or 2, and have law diversity and
.connectivity to other wetlands and waterways.
(5) Class 5 wetlands: wetlands assigned the Highly Impacted rating in the Ramsey-
Washington Metro Watershed District Wetlands Inventory, 1995. Class 5 wetlands are
g rY
those with conditions and functions most impacted by human activities, with the least
diverse vegetation communities, least community resource significance and similar
characteristics.
For the purposes of this section, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Classification of
Wetlands and D water Habitats of the United Stakes, MYS/QBS-L9/31 C din et al
.1 79 contains the descriptions and photographs of wetland classes and subclasses. [*The
_� P P P
definitions. provided above for Wetland Classes 1 -5 may be modified by the final results of
the Washin -
RamseY g ton Metro Watershed District's current assessment of wetland functions
and values in the City.]
SECTION I Applicability
(a) This ordinance shall apply to any person or use that would alter a wetland, stream or
wetland buffer after , 1995 (date of ordinance).
(b) When any provision of any ordinance conflicts with this chapter, that which provides
more P rotection to the wetland or stream buffers shall apply unless specifically provided
otherwise in this chapter; provided, such exceptions shall not conflict with state regulations, such
as the State Shoreland Program.
4
-t
SECTION 4, General Exemptions
(a) The following are exemptions to this ordinance:
(1) Structures in existence on the date this ordinance becomes effective. Such structures may
be remodelled, reconstructed or replaced provided that the new construction does not take
up additional wetland or stream buffer land.
(2) The construction or maintenance of public drainage facilities or erosion control
improvements.
(3) The maintenance of public or semi -public facilities.
(4) Public and semipublic projects, such as streets, utilities and parks, whether built by a
public agency or private developer, shall be subject to this ordinance, except that the city
council may waive these requirements where there would be a greater public need for the
project than to meet the. requirement of this ordinance. In waiving these requirements,
the City Council shall follow the standards in section 5. The City Council shall hold a
public hearing before declaring such a waiver. The City shall notify the property owners
within 350 feet of the wetland or stream buffer at least ten days before the hearing.
(5) Where this ordinance would deny all .reasonable use of a lot of record. In such case, any
buildin shall be constructed to maximize the setback from a wetland or stream buffer.
g
Federal, State or watershed District rules and regulations shall apply. Alterations to the
wetland or stream buffer shall be the minimum necessary to allow for the reasonable use
of the ro . where feasible, the City may require the mitigati of any alteration of
P I��y ty Y on
a wetland buffer.
(6) Where the watershed district has approved a wetland filling permit. The City shall
require mitigation.
SEMON 5. Standards for utility and trail exemptions.
(a) Constriction of utilities may only be permitted in wetland or stream buffers when the
applicant demonstrates there is no other practical alternative and the following requirements are
met:
1. Utility ,corridors shall not be allowed when the wetland or stream buffer is used by
species listed as endangered or threatened by the federal government or state.
2. Utility orridors, including any allowed maintenance roads, shall be as far from the
wetland or stream as possible.
3. Utility corridor construction and maintenance shall protect the wetland, stream or buffer
5
and avoid large trees as much as possible. The use of pesticides, herbicides or other
hazardous or toxic. substances shall not be allowed.
4. Utility corridors shall require an additional, adjacent, undisturbed buffer width equal to
the proposed corridor width, including any allowed maintenance roads.
5. Utility corridors shall be replanted with appropriate native vegetation at pre- construction
densities or greater as soon after construction ends. as possible.
b. Any additional utility corridor access for maintenance shall be provided as much as
possible at specific points rather than by parallel roads. If parallel roads are necessary
they shall be of a minimum width, but no greater than fifteen feet.
(b) The City may allow public and private trails . in wetland or stream buffers, subject to the
following guidelines: ,
1. The trail surface shall not be of impervious materials.
2. Buffers shall be expanded, where possible, equal to the width of the trail corridor,
including disturbed areas.
SEC17ION 6. Variances
(a) The City Council may approve variances to the requirements in this ordinance. Before
the City Council acts on a variance, the Planning Commission shall review the variance
appli cation and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall hold a
public hearing before approving a variance. The City shall notify the property owners within 350
feet of the wetland or stream buffer at least ten days before the hearing. Where feasible, the City
may require the mitigation of any alteration of a wetland or stream buffer.
(b) To approve a variance, the Council must make the following findings:
(1) Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
property under consideration.
(2) The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship" as used in granting a variance means the property in question cannot be put
to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The plight of the
landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by the landowner, and
the. variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic
considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property
exists under the terms of the ordinance.
2
SECrION 7. Wetland and stream easement required.
The property owner of any property affected by this ordinance shall record wetland or stream
easements with Ramsey County. The easements shall cover the wetlands, .streams and wetland
buffers. These easements shall describe the boundaries of the wetland or stream buffer and
prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within the buffer, stream or the
wetland. Such easements shall be recorded with a final plat or before the City issues a building
permit for the pmperty. The applicant shall submit proof that the notice has been filed.
SECTION S. Wetland and stream buffer standards.
(a) An affected property owner shall maintain a wetland and/or stream buffer. Any planting
in a - buffer shall be selected from native wetland and upland vegetation.
(b) g, vegetation, Clearing, of ve etation r dumping in a buffer is prohibited, except for
g
selective clearing and pruning of trees or vegetation which are dead, diseased, noxious weeds
or hazards. The Ci ma y waive this requirement where the watershed district has approved a
� y
permit for filling all or part of a wetland.
(c) The following are the minimum required buffer widths *:
ATetland C Las 1 CIQSS 2 Mass 3 loss 4 Class S
+Streams
Average
buffer width 100 ft. 100 ft. 50 ft. 25 ft. 0 ft.
Minimum buffer 100 ft. 50 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 0 ft.
width
Building setback 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
from outer edge
of buffer
*The City may reduce these widths to no less than 20 feet where the land within the buffer is
not in direct drainage to a wetland, accept Class 5.
(d) The minimum buffer widths shall apply to all wetlands and streams, including those that
are restored, relocated, replaced or enhanced.
(e) The City may require a variable buffer width to protect valuable adjacent habitat.
(f) Prior to altering any wetland or stream buffer, the applicant shall mark the buffer area
7
in the field.
(g) Prior to issuance of permits, the common boundary between a buffer, and the adjacent
land shall be identified using permanent signs as set out in Section 8.
SECTION 9. Temporary fenc signs and survey marking.
(a) Prior to grading or construction, snow fencing and erosion control fencing shall be placed
around the borders of wetland and stream buffers. Such fencing . must remain in place until all
development activities that. may affect the buffer are completed.
(b) The boundary between a buffer and adjacent land shall be identified using permanent
signs. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing,
vegetation cutting, filling or dumping.
(c) When platting, the plat must show the wetland boundaries as approved by the Watershed
District.
SECTION 10. Mitigation and restoration of wetland buffers.
Mitigation is required when a wetland or stream buffer has been altered. The developer shall
submit a mit ation lan to the Ci ty for their approval. Where the City requires restoration or
g P
replacement, the wetland or stream buffer shall be replanted with native vegetation which would
be similar to the original vegetation in s p� ies and densities. Mitigation shall be at least 1:1 for
the buffer area and functions lost.
8
�y
MEMORAND Acti by C
To: _ Gretchen Maglich, A i t ty M alter
From: Bruce K. Anderson, ct r r & Recreation Endorsed
M...
Subj : Richard Long Propert ace Site No. 140ce
Date: December 6, 1994 Rejected
Data
For the December 12, 1994, City Council Meeting
Introduction
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed Open Space Site No. 140 at their regular
scheduled meeting in September. I prepared a staff memorandum which was reviewed by
the City Council at their November 28th meeting outlining the Park and Recreation Com-
mission recommendation.
Background
The Park and Recreation Commission stated that the city should pursue acquisition of
Open Space Site No. 140 at the northwest quadrant of the Gateway Trail and Burlington
Northern Trail for Open Space purposes. The Park Commission further clarified their
position that the crossing of these two major trail corridors justified the need for a Rest
Area to include a kiosk, bathroom, drinking ountain and possibly a small parking lot. It
g p Y p g
was the general consensus of the Commission that PAC monies could be utilized to acquire
a portion of the property if it was deemed inappropriate to develop parcels acquired with
Open Space dollars.
I have spoken with Chairperson Jeanne Ewald on this issue and it is her consensus, as well
as mine,,' that the Park Commission intent to use PAC monies would be more appropriate
in the southeast corner to acquire the Soo Line property, if necessar p . It ap that the
Park Commission's objective to develop a kiosk or Rest Area could be accomplished on
the existing city owned property upon further review.
Recommendation
The Park and Recreation Commission does not have adequate monies in their PAC Fund
to acquire the Open Space Parcel No. 140. The Park Commission does believe that a
minimal Rest Area would be appropriate in this area and that, if necessary, limited PAC
Fund monies could be expended for expansion of the Rest Area into the Soo Line er
ro
p p
ty.
The Park and Recreation Commission did not make a formal motion on this issue, but I
believe this fairly represents their position.
I concur with the concept of developing a small Rest Area, due to the major crossing of
two trail corridors, as well as the premise that PAC monies be utilized on a limited basis
to acquire Open Space, due to other high priorities within the Maplewood Park System
p
such as Kohlman Lake Overlook acquisition and Kohlman Park neighborhood expansion.
AGENDA N0. 7-'- 5/
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager 6*4 lu ` �
RE: PURCHASE OF OPEN SPACE -SITE #140
DATE: December 5, 1994
INTRODUCTION
At the November 28 meeting, the City Council reviewed the purchase- of Open space
Site #140. The Council referred the site to the Parks Department to use PAC funds.
The purpose of this report is to inform the Council about the Parks Department
recommendation.
BACKGROUND
A report from Bruce Anderson, Director of Parks and. Recreation, is attached. The
Parks department is interested in the southeast corner of the trails intersection and not
in the northwest corner belonging to Mr. Long.
The purchase .price of the property is $80,000 plus an additional $500 for the appraisal
work that the property owner performed. Since the Parks department does not want to
purchase the site, it is back before the City Council for a final decision.
RECOMMENDATION
If the City Council does not want to use Open Space funds for Site #140, direct staff to
discontinue the negotiations for the property. If the Council wants to make it open
space, direct staff to take the appropriate action to close, and adopt the attached
resolution which changes the land use plan from R -2 to Open Space upon closing.
k
Ott
M • w a . u
.. 1577 two
Lp
Sol MOO am 0 0 1A LWO
_IQ
N IL � Iwo
MOP
w I i s t0 N u1 , _ h
� �► I r
VAcArc Do Bo�00G G• -'11
--2 OFI 11
AP
LP
04
0., 1 1 moo
M ►
N � Q � " �j .► -' I v � -� t
A . �.•+ 4
ENCE
CLAIR
T 'I'll, 4 1 40 Off
66 40 to
40 1 ;70 1 fe
s
• Iw'N Iw N Ov I
45
COP
N ' � '�. _
I Are ago _ . ,—
I
tum,p . . 0
4 H u $
Ad
:1 40 l ' , �o »
MOW
• �
I `
o o � t � � w o N -
37 CR
-4
r
vi �' 0
0 VAC -
i T � I _
JOI
WIND,
N
Ira �
t4 0
Coo fed ip 0
•
4 L
/. /• i
Do c0 10QdTS b• A 40 1 I J
1_
,o �
r� +
all . — 1 r
w N 1 �, j _
fool 33
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development proposed a change to the City's land use
plan from R -2 (single and double dwellings) to OS (open space).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located north of the DNR Gateway
Trail between English Street and the former railroad right -of -way.
WTEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On November 21, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve the plan amendment.
2. On November 28, 1994, the City Council discussed this land use plan change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
change for the following reasons:
1. The City plans to buy this site for open space.
2. This parcel is at the crossing of two regional trails.
3. The woods on this parcel screen the State trail from English Street.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1994.
- S
MEMORANDUM action by Counell
To: Michael A. McGuire, Cit Ma er
From: B Endorse -
Bruce K. Anderson, Dire rk & Recreation
Subj. Carver Elementary Schoo y Center Expansion RejoateA
Date. December 7, 1994 Dat
For the December 12, 1994 City Council Meeting
Introduction
The City Council tabled any action on the proposal to bid the gymnasium expansion at Carver
Elementary School as a bid option on November 28, 1994. The city has allocated $250,000
for expansion of gymnasium space and development of a southern Community Center in con-
junction with Carver Elementary School in 1995.
Background
City staff has been meeting with School District representatives and A.S. T.R. architects for
developing Carver Elementary School. A blueprint was forwarded to the City Council which
outlined two bid options for expanding the Carver Elementary School gym.
Staff recommended that the City Council authorize A.S. T.R. to design the gymnasium expansion
as a bid option with the understanding that the city would be responsible for the n up-front design
g
costs. The design costs were estimated between $24,000 to $40,000, depending upon the extent
of building expansion.
I have requested that representatives from School District #622 attend the City ouncil meeting
g
on Monday, November 28, as well as a representative from the architecture firm to clan an
tti f h hi clarify Y
questions the City Council may have regarding the proposed building expansion.
I have received a Draft Copy of the Cooperative Facility Use Agreement between School District
#622 and the City of Maplewood for utilization of the proposed Carver Elementary School Com-
munity Center. The agreement is similar in format to the Edgerton Community Center. The
differences at this point are as follows:
1. The proposed size of the Community Center.
2. The city would pay a percentage of the utilities heating, air-conditioning, electricity g g, g, a ectricity and water
for the Community Center gym space, based on a pro -rated share of the entire building durin
operating hours. This issue differs with the Roseville School District Agreement, but I feel it
is fair and equitable.
3. The School District has requested to be a priority user for the Adventure Connection Program,
which is a combined city and School District program between 4:00 .m. .m. and 6:00
p p
I feel confident that we will be able to reach a fair and equitable agreement with the School
District for use of the facility. The mayor issue for City Council consideration is expansion of the
gym space.
Recommendation
It is my recommendation that the City Council approve the Alternate a -1 for the Carver gymna-
sium expansion at an estimated cost of $325,000, with the understanding that the city would
assume the design costs of $24,000, should we determine to not proceed with the construction
of the building.
AGENDA NO. S /"a
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager
RE: PURCHASE OF OPEN SPACE -SITE #103C
DATE: December 6, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Aoo _ OQ11
Endorsed, . �
Modifie
ejeote
Da
At the October 24 meeting, the City Council referred the purchase of Open Space Site
#103C to the Parks &Recreation Commission and the Planning Commission for review.
The proposed acquisition is back before the City Council for consideration.
BACKGROUND
Last November, the citizens of Maplewood approved the $5 million bond referendum
for the acquisition of open space. This is the third property to come before the City
Council for consideration.
The property, Site #103C, is located in the northeast corner of the City south of County
Road D, west of McKnight and east of Ariel. A copy of a location map is attached. It is
composed of four different parcels totalling 23 acres. Parcels 1, 2 and 3 are owned by
Mr. Donald Conklin. The price of these 19 acres is $580,000. Parcel 4 is owned by the
Wesleyan Church in Iowa, _and -.the price is $75,000. The total purchase price of the 23
ares is $655,000.
Commissions Review
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 5 to consider
changing the land use plan if the site were acquired and reviewed the acquisition to
advise the Council whether the proposed acquisition follows the Comprehensive Plan.
A copy of Ken Roberts' staff report is attached. The minutes from the Planning
Commission meeting will be provided to the City Council at the meeting. In addition,
the Parks &Recreation Commission reviewed the acquisition, and their list of pros and
cons is attached.
The negotiations for this property were handled by the Trust For PublicLand. Ms. Peg
Kohring, a botanist representing TPL, feels that the site is a good candidate for open
space. She bases her recommendation on several things. The two property owners
are willing sellers at a reasonable price; the property is discounted for the electrical
transmission lines; it is one of the larger parcels in the City; it contains good examples
of prairie, oaks, and wildlife; and it is a good buffer for the intensely developed
neighborhood which is home to the Maplewood Mall. TPL coordinated a Phase I
environmental study of the site, and it concluded that there were no . indications of
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Site.
The question of the NSP transmission power lines was raised at a previous Council
meeting. The easement runs the entire east/west length of the site through Conklin's
Parcels 2 and 3 as well as Parcel 4 owned by the Wesleyan Church. The width of the
easement ranges from 70 feet to 225 feet. The total easement area is about 4.8 acres
or 21 % of the total 23 acre site. The easement is used for overhead electrical
transmission lines and towers as well as an underground petroleum pipeline. The
value of the easement was taken into consideration in the appraisal. It is zoned Farm
with a land use designation of RM, medium density, multi - family residential.
It should be noted that Mr. Conklin, the owner of Parcels 1, 2, and 3, has notified The
Trust For Public Land that he will not hold the property for the City. if the decision is
tabled.
Progress Report On Other Open Space Sites
Site Number Location Acres Price
#142 English /Frost 24 $827,000
Status: City closed on the property on December IN
#140 Trail Heads near #142 1.6 $80,000
Status: City Council requested that Park money be used for purchase.
#103C County Road D/Woodlynn 23 $655,000
Status: Under consideration.
#153A Priory, Century/Larpenteur 39 $1,200,000
Status: Being considered at the December 19 meeting.
TOTAL 88 $2,762,000
KA
Possible purchases currently being negotiated.
#173 South end, Bonsell 38.5
Status: Offer has been made by City.
#108 Pearson, Hazelwd /Beam 7.5
Status: Owner is ordering his own appraisal.
#151 County Rd. B /Rice 17 -29
Status: Joint project with I.S.D. 624 and 623 being considered.
#116 Spoon Lake, Mapleleaf Dev. ?32
Status: Negotiations with owners continue.
#16113 South of Linwood, Kayser ?30
Status: Currently being appraised.
An estimate of the total purchase price for these five properties is $1.7 million to $2.9
million. Expenses for the acquisition program are estimated at $300,000 which
includes studies, appraisals, legal . fees, and taxes. This leaves approximately $4.7
million for land costs.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider the purchase of Open Space Site
#103C and 1) direct staff to take the appropriate actions to close if they decide to
acquire it; and 2) adopt the attached resolution. This resolution changes the land use
plan for Site #103C from R -2 (single and double dwellings) and R -3M (multiple
dwellings - mediums density) to Open Space (OS) upon closing.
3
-K
� w � •9 I S $ y
co
� � F
X70 934.52 t 9d - - - --
t �
4x
3138 •s'Z� 2b' 40 4 1 1
g oo I
lob
4 dkb
1 I •�
1
N � t 1 •
1
y- -
1 � 1
I
w t ' 0
1 1 • 0
b2.8�'
3 9 40' o' N
O I
.-� o �1 j I 1 `4►1
1�
1 1 w
1 0
r r
w, o
N lto'
m N o 1 N 1 ' y
w o 0 , 900 p •.
N 1
'D.9
5O' � 6b = 2 O 1 "'� Cr.
.28
4 "r A 11 2
1
w
t� r
yl I
.� W
r 1 v
w
• t� � I a 1
• ' 1
v 4
0
TNORLIN�
u � > c � ,, 1 •" 0
J u►
N
e �
R T4
. I qc 2v w
` R
N r
1
No-
t SO
w bib
.._ w LA low �. 1 - o�
1 g oo �� o
a ^
sv�
'
0 0 �G �� J► 4A u 1 150 ' '.! 33
,�
IKACa-r I so ril-limi ted'*:W 9468776 12-01-94 12:51 P. 01.
December 1, 1994
Ms. Gretchen Ma
Assistant City Mana
Cit of Maplewood
1830 E Count Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Mathilda M. Howlett Propert
Dear Ms. Ma
It was brou to our attention several months a that Maplewood desired our
propert on Count Road D for park purposes. After consultation with all 19 heirs it
was a to sell it to Maplewood at an extremel low price and it would be somethin
Mrs. Howlett would like ver much. We, therefore, discontinued our ne with a
developer in y our favor,
We now have been told that the cit ma desire to put off the purchase until March or
April of 1995. This is ver disconcertin because the reasons are not apparent to us.
To be a prudent trustee, I feel I must sell the propert if I have another bonified offer.
If the Cit of Maplewood wishes to bu the propert now with a small down pa
and the balance in April, that would be ade
Please call if y ou have an q uestions,
Sincerel
Donald G. Conklin, trustee
DGC:bjc
cc: Pe Kohrin
The Trust for Public Land
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development proposed a change to the City's land
use s lan from. R -2 (single and double dwellin and R -3M (multiple dwellings - medium
p g)
density) to OS (open space).
.W EREAS, this pp
change applies to the undeveloped property located between Woodlynn
Avenue and County Road D west of McKnight Road.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On December 5, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff
published a hearin g p notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
p
speak and resent written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the
p
City Council approve the plan amendment.
2. On December 12, 1994, the City Council discussed this land use plan change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
change for the following reasons:
1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space.
2. This neighborhood has less planned open space than the average neighborhood.
3. The pipelines and high- voltage power lines through this site make it more desirable for
open space than development.
The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 199_.
MEMORAND
To: Gretchen Magli s' t i g ty ana er
From: Bruce K. Ande of P ks & Recreation
Subj : Open Space Ac is' C
Date: December 5, 19
For the December 12, 1994, City Council Meeting
Introduction
The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the possible acquisition of Site 103C located at
County Road D and Woodlyn Avenue at their regular scheduled meeting on S 19
_ g p
1994. The Park Commission has reviewed each of the Open Space sites strictly from a Parks
and Recreation perspective and has not prioritized the sites, but rather p rovided issues for
City Council consideration.
Background
The Park and Recreation Commission itemized the following issues for City Council considera-
tion regarding _the possible acquisition of Site 103C which totals. 26 acres:
1. The power lines currently traverse the entire site, which reduces the aesthetic value of the
property.
2. The power lines require extensive maintenance, specifically clear cutting, limits the
p Y g�
aesthetic view and potential development of the property.
3. The Williams Pipeline also runs through the . ro ert
p p Y
4. There a nice stand of oak trees on the property, which is considered a plus.
5. The property is near Joy Park, which is currently owned by Ramsey County. Ramsey County
has proposed to convey this 60 acres of Open Space property to the City of Maplewood.
Although the status of the property would not change, potential ownership would provide a
"more direct sense of Open Space" for Maplewood residents.
It is the consensus of the Park and Recreation Commission that the site would be best utilized for
_ establishing a native prairie and /or wildlife sanctuary.
A Park Land Inventory Survey was completed by Park Commissioner Peter Fischer, which indi-
cates that there is 103.5 acres of park or open space land in Plannin g Area No. 5. The 103.5
acres include 15.5 acres for Playcrest Park, 25 acres for Maplewood Heights Park, and 63 acres
for the proposed Joy Park. The planning requirement for this district would be 16 acres which
indicates that we have an overage of 87 acres within this planning rea. These figures are redi-
g � p
cated on a total acreage of 500 acres for Planning District No. 5, which currently has 20.7 percent
of the city's park land.
Recommendation
Although the Park and Recreation Commission did not make a specific recommendation, it was
clear through their discussion that they did not perceive this parcel as a high priority and felt that
with the potential conveyance of Joy Park that this site should be given careful consideration b
the City Council prior to acquisition. Staff concurs with the Park and Recreation Commission
recommendation.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Changewp-Open Space Site 103C
LOCATION: Between Woodlynn and County Road D. west of McKnight Road
DATE: December 1, 1994
INTRODUCTION
The City Council directed the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission to
review the purchase of a property for open space. Maplewood's Open Space Committee has
numbered this site 103C. It comprises 23 .acres that are between Woodlynn Avenue and County
Road D, west of McKnight Road. (See the maps on pages 4 and 5.) The staff has negotiated a
price of $655,000.
State law requires that the Planning Commission advise the Council whether proposed public
acquisitions follow the Comprehensive Plan. The City has not shown this site on the land use
plan for open space, so we have scheduled a public hearing to consider changing the land use
plan for this area. The changes would be from R -2 (single and double dwellings) and R -3M
(multiple dwellings -- medium density) to OS (open space). (See the existing and proposed land
use plan maps on pages 6 and 7.)
BACKGROUND
On November 2, 1993, the voters approved the open space referendum. This vote authorized the
City to sell up to $5 million in general obligation bonds to buy land for open space.
.The Open Space Committee recommended that the City Council consider - bny_ing -open- space- - -
from alist of nineteen sites. This list included the fourteen top -rated sites in Maplewood and five
additional sites that the Committee has rated top in their respective neighborhoods, but not City-
wide. Site 103C was one of the five additional sites. Since then, the City has narrowed this list to
nine properties. (See the list on page 8 and the map on page 9.) These are the properties that the
owners have expressed an interest in selling. The City Council has authorized the staff to
negotiate the purchase of one of these sites —Site 142 (Frost.Avenue and English Street). The
City should close on this site by December 1, 1994.
On September 19, 1994, the. Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed Site 103C. The
Commission made the following observations:
• The power line service damages the area.
• Maintenance of the easements disrupts the area.
• Williams Brother's Pipelines at the site. (Note that the pipeline is Standard Oil rather than
Williams Brother's)
• A nice stand of oak trees is on the site.
• The site is close to Joy Park. Over 60 acres is proposed to be conveyed from the County.
(Since the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the County has withdrawn their offer
to transfer County park land to the City.)
This site is possible for prairie grass and wildflowers.
• Planning Area 5 currently has about 25% of the City park land. Most of the rest of the City
areas have 1%, 3% and 4 %. It would be beneficial for the City to spread the open space into
the neighborhoods that do not have as much park land. Planning areas 1, 2 and 3 (all the land
west of Highway 61) have very Tittle park and open land.
DISCUSSION
The Open Space Committee ranked this site 57 out of 67 sites, but first of the sites in this
neighborhood. The open space ranking is the lowest of the top nine sites. (See the chart on page
8)
This site has several advantages:
• while this neighborhood has a high percentage of park land, it could use more open space.
This neighborhood has 500 acres. The City is planning 100 acres of open space or 20 % of the
total acreage in the neighborhood. The average median percentage for all neighborhoods is
27 %. Adding the 23 acres of Site 103C would increase the percentage of open space to about
25 %. (Note that the OS acreage includes lakes.)
• The power lines and pipelines through this site snake it more suitable for open space than
development. The City requires a 104 -foot setback to a pipeline. The City requires a
disclaimer on truth -in- housing reports around high - voltage power :lines to advise about
potential health risks.
We received two letters in support of the City buying this site. (See the letters on pages 10 -12.)
The main disadvantage to this site is its low open -space ranking compared to the other top nine
sites and the relatively high price. The City estimates that the cost to buy eight of the top nine
2
sites is $4,462,000 to $5,062,000. (The ninth site is the Kayser site. The City may not be .able to
buy this site because of legal problems.) The City has about $4.7 million to spend on property. If
the City spends $655,000 on Site 103C, there may not be enough money to buy higher- ranked
sites. While Site 103C has open space value, the City should buy open space based on the
rankings developed by the Open .Space Committee.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council should take one of the following actions:
A. Table this decision until the City decides not to buy one of the higher - ranked sites.
B. If the City Council decides to buy Site 103C, they should adopt the resolution on page 13:
This .resolution changes the land use plan from R -2 (sin gle and double dwellings) and R -31VI
(multiple dwellings— medium density) to OS (open space). The City should make this
change because:
1: Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space.
2. This neighborhood has less planned open space than the average neighborhood.
3. The pipelines and high - voltage power lines through this site make it more desirable for
open space than development.
The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property.
p: sect- 29 /openlan4.gwo
Attachments:
1 Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Existing Land Use Map -Site 103C
4. Proposed Land Use Map -Site 103C
5. List of Top -Rated Sites
6. Map of Top -Rated Sites
7. Letter from Char Brooker
8. Letter from Margaret Kohring
9. Land Use Plan Change Resolution
3
Attachment 1
WA
r BkAR LAKE
• • w• • • • •
• •� , i . • so • b • •• •• I 1 • • ♦• • • -
•
♦ 1 •� • • • • - • • •• ••�
• • • • • • w. • •• • • ••♦
• . •
• • • *• • • •
COUNTY RGAD p . •• • • • • •
• ♦ • 0. 0 •
GAU AVE
WOODLYNN
• �;s ✓�.;'•v+bv;:�r •'rr s%�;:%f;�� , %:y�r:•,:;'er �: is "r'.:, • • •
AVE. o 4 -..
. BRFNNER AVE
CSR , AVE.
i.i Z 2 •
' W 2.
19 0
a � •
L i 1 2 t t AVE.
z
U 9Ac 1 W • •
3 AYE•t •.
STANaRIDGE ..
Q MAPLE t,/1.
AVE
BE A VE. '
• • e % % .•
MAPLE � AVE.- `� • • 'o • • • • be a
•' no
rl i
Z
RADATZ ` �`t AVE.
MESSAa
AV i :•� � i . t:
W
RAMSEY . � NORTH SA/NT PAUL
COURT
KOHLAAAN
AVE
n23
g o
W
rEDGEHILL R0.
m
CERV/1
CT.
LOCATION MAP
4
4
N
W
•.. w
cc
EL �
N
'• -
'
•�
A
..
w'
CERVAIS AVE..
•.
Q
CASTLE AVE. ..
We
Q
COPE AVE. 6'
A A •
•
LOCATION MAP
4
4
N
Attachment 2
(34) b a3o �� WATER 2�a
to
P� 329. I a.a> .�t vo s).21 s" • t �.sz �c k4 �) C4 C4
.i
POWER LINES 3? 1.4 s N 1 34� 3 4 4 s s z N N 14 --a- -- y w ? 1 3 4 T-
* __._` c i 0 1 H 3
WOODLY
0 2 3 4 1.2 4
.4.a, 00342 - A. N 4• , �r f
dw 1. 0Za (33)
•
JFA PL A,T COPY pros orTAtt .
']• *..- �'_''_". _ • . &(0 -- - ' i' 0 /T LOT A • .!
c4 41
na 6 40
IN
6° S c 33)� ' 12) ?O w
�O yet a E(3i) o - ( c to
�.o z r o Q �► s. 3. V , ° ~ �, (37)
O O
a (Ze • ( 1 r is is 1 7 i» 1 21 . 22 ,ds)
El
n ti R* ,� O
Gko M
a • qZl. 54C �. ZG (ZZ}
4,9- 61t. �i vt Os �t �rsc (n� :, ' {)
. N IN W O D is E R E 13 14 Is , _ 1 2 s2 ' i�
q 5 5 7 9 + t0� Il i2 +; (io) 1} t�'r 25 _ orb' - - -- r
(Z2) c) ♦)s) (_�) (27) �) �+ Q a -- - -: o . .r t sa
Q - -- nos 41�
? o Do ` .66' $. -�. itioF•�_si �a.o. »a`rw`�i oe`► wosr► - u.o' -- N
�
_,.�. ....► _ •--- __ .... _ _ sae «' e: �'..".'.""� s'r"' 1 ,• • s so' - -^ � : � ,Q MM /4•
' D•c' 17ot, =!. 7.12 -i'� - • �O o 3
+ss (O I11S X35' ( 1 103.irI' Wt loins' lo' loi p' p �oS' •'�' 4 3 A �! '1 a�1 1 2 3 •i
�" -
PROPERTY LINE MAP
5
4 .
N
COUNTY ROAD D -
-
-
2G3. is ►
�
�
03 N tin
.41 W. �
�/�
W
V W � •Hac•
r4 o
2090
3.�,.�• ..
,3.so �. 103
�- "
_ N
N �
fC4
N , � N � � 3113
, N C4
34p 3101 ,
2 f4, eas a'
O
r
�.,
(t1'�
3095
(b)
•
.,
`
O
(34) b a3o �� WATER 2�a
to
P� 329. I a.a> .�t vo s).21 s" • t �.sz �c k4 �) C4 C4
.i
POWER LINES 3? 1.4 s N 1 34� 3 4 4 s s z N N 14 --a- -- y w ? 1 3 4 T-
* __._` c i 0 1 H 3
WOODLY
0 2 3 4 1.2 4
.4.a, 00342 - A. N 4• , �r f
dw 1. 0Za (33)
•
JFA PL A,T COPY pros orTAtt .
']• *..- �'_''_". _ • . &(0 -- - ' i' 0 /T LOT A • .!
c4 41
na 6 40
IN
6° S c 33)� ' 12) ?O w
�O yet a E(3i) o - ( c to
�.o z r o Q �► s. 3. V , ° ~ �, (37)
O O
a (Ze • ( 1 r is is 1 7 i» 1 21 . 22 ,ds)
El
n ti R* ,� O
Gko M
a • qZl. 54C �. ZG (ZZ}
4,9- 61t. �i vt Os �t �rsc (n� :, ' {)
. N IN W O D is E R E 13 14 Is , _ 1 2 s2 ' i�
q 5 5 7 9 + t0� Il i2 +; (io) 1} t�'r 25 _ orb' - - -- r
(Z2) c) ♦)s) (_�) (27) �) �+ Q a -- - -: o . .r t sa
Q - -- nos 41�
? o Do ` .66' $. -�. itioF•�_si �a.o. »a`rw`�i oe`► wosr► - u.o' -- N
�
_,.�. ....► _ •--- __ .... _ _ sae «' e: �'..".'.""� s'r"' 1 ,• • s so' - -^ � : � ,Q MM /4•
' D•c' 17ot, =!. 7.12 -i'� - • �O o 3
+ss (O I11S X35' ( 1 103.irI' Wt loins' lo' loi p' p �oS' •'�' 4 3 A �! '1 a�1 1 2 3 •i
�" -
PROPERTY LINE MAP
5
4 .
N
White Bear Lake
ZaLfarteria��
R•2
B S R-
��J
;!run
I
!now
■ate i�ie�
t��i a"w Mr,3' � •
North St Paul,
-'
,han•-
Mftft® !i lij-
kzKA
"Iwo
r
poll
. � ' 1�11f ■tl I
.. • � } �'`B'' � ��`-'til ��O�r]
Zow tial �.Ati!!!!■
t t t a ��"i'7�Z�fl�— •� ■N � ■oiPM
tit. �0 r rl� ��1��■
in
d1� 7r �`lipR �:.L�POOR
1'91AS'v
1
L14�,
NJ
il� ��i�i i�i�t�lii�N�,�■ !i t� r!/�. W
Bill
2 ]•R7S '�
� � ►`tt�tir� � ■
t�
MOM s ■
M-00101000101 I
at: il�It�IIe;• t
tr•—�_�■ I
_ ■ice ..����w,ee
.,sir sNorth
j-
011 /
St Paultm
Tmw
•
.Attachment 5
TOP .NINE OPEN SPACE SITES FROM THE OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDED OPEN SPACE UST
8
Open Space
Ranking
Cit y ID#
67 Sites
Prope,.rty_ ^ Location Owner
Acres
Estimated Cost
153A
1
Priory
39
$11120
151
6
East of Rice, South of B Zittel & Oren.
29
+
142
6
English and Frost
24
$827,000
161B
6
South of Linwood Ave., East of Sterling St.-
30
Kayser
108
9
Hazelwood and Beare -- Pearson
8
+
116
13
Near Spoon Lake — Kuslich & Pillsbury
32
+
173
21
Sterling, south of Carver
40
+
140
38
Crossing of Trails, N. of Frost on English
2
$80,000
1030
57
Between County Road D and Woodlynn
23
$655,000
+ Total estimate to buy
these four sites is $1.7 million
.Appraisals being done, but may be difficult to acquire because of legal complications.
8
108
Attachment 6
r_
m
J
132
r
-1 53A
1538
156 ---+
Iff" 7
■
Maplewood
OPEN SPACE
Top Rated Areas
THE TOP SITES ARE CIRCLED
9
.
OWN
tTr
3 js
nil
17� `
G w� fv1 i
I
z 7Z L41 ae( no AIC-01
An Evaluation of the Natural Features of the woodlynn Avenue
and County Road D Site -
The acreage here is evolving from its previous use as a working
grazed over farm to-an open meadow with oak stands.
The presence of high power lines is an advantage in this meadow
environment because of the use by raptors. During migrations and
during the summer, hawks use the high perches to locate re and
g P _ prey
to rest.
There is a significant breeding population of pheasants.
Songbirds which are on the decline because of habitat destruction
of open meadows are increasing in number as the meadow evolves.
Field sparrows, clay colored
sparrows, fox sparrows, and meadowlarks
P
have taken up residence. Eastern kingbirds, cardinals swallows
g � � ,
purple martins, goldfinches, pine siskins, as well as the more
common chickadees and nuthatches utilize the meadow for breedin-
g
and food supplies.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has visited this site
over the past two years when told of several reports of Loggerhead
Shrike sitings. This Shrike is endangered in Minnesota. It is
possible that migrating Shrikes may nest in this habitat as more
meadows get developed. They eat insects, rodents, and occassionally
small birds. The habitat of brush, old fence P osts, and meadow
is ideal. The MN DNR will continue to monitor this site.
This site would be ideal for several bluebird trails.
The site is part of a natural bird corridor that starts at Lakewood
Community College, to the YMCA property, to this site and over to
�
Silver Lake or Kohlman Lake.
There have been successful dens and woodchuck dens in the past
three years.
The area could be enhanced with more perch sites, keeping the brushy
areas, introducing native prairie grasses, and oak regeneration.
10
a
T H E
TRUST
F O A
PUBLIC
LAND
Conserving Hand
for People
21 November 1994
Gretchen Maglich
.Assistant City Manager
City of Maplewood
1880 E..County Road 8
Maplewood, MN 55109
Attachment 8
NOV 2 2 !'�`79 A
L L_
v
} t
1
Dear Gretchen,
O behalf of the Trust for Public Land, I would like to recommend
that the City of Maplewood acquire the Conklin and Wesleyan Church
tracts as part of the Maplewood Open Space Acquisition Program. My
recommendation is based on the location of the property in the City,
the natural values of the land, the price and the willingness of the
landowners to sell.
If any part of Maplewood needs open space it' is the area around the
Maplewood Mall, The Conklin property provides a natural buffer to
the neighborhood from the mall buildings, lights and traffic.. As
the vegetation continues to mature, there will soon a complete
vegetative barrier for the neighborhood.
The majestic trees on the property provide homes for many animals
and the meadow is a splash of color as the summer wildflowers bloom.
Despite the commercial location, a walk on the Conklin property
providers the feeling that one is far from the City. The day I
visited the property a red- tailed hawk circled lazily around and
swooped down to pounce on what looked like a mouse. How many cities
can say there is this much wildlife in their city?
It is remarkable that both Mr. Conklin and the Wesleyan Church have
agreed at the same time. to sell their properties ensuring that the
City of Maplewood will have a large open space unit. Both of these
landowners have waited for the selection and approval process to be
completed, with the understanding that the properties were on the
approved acquisition list.
The Trust for Public Land
Midwest Region
420 North Fifth Street
Suite 865
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 338 -8494
Fax (612) 338 -8467
10
11
21 November 1994
Page .2
The appraisals for both properties are discounted because of the
power line crossing the properties making this acquisition a good
value for the City of Maplewood
Based on the reasonable price, the open space values, the
willingness of the landowners and the beauty of the land, I urge you
to approve the acquisition of the Conklin and Wesleyan Church
properties.
Sincerely,
Margaret A. Kohring
Special Projects
12
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council /
FROM: Gretchen Maglich
DATE: December 8, 1994
RE: OPEN SPACE SITE #103C
Mr. Flay Arko visited me on Thursday to deliver the attached petition. It was signed by
residents of the Nettleton townhomes on Woodlynn adjacent to Open Space Site
#1030. This is Agenda Item J -1 on your December 12 meeting.
Ll
0 � n �I I �.� -7M ii D.
rA
jf�
z z�'7 wood) .,.. l�v�
Of
i v -4 r
ti
- - I- - -- --- ------
I C) I LAk,�� ��hbo�hCZ::) �
Loe, C �
1-,JJY-1 O �
00"
O S ! +i V�tS an
l�l �--L C..� ► 1� i � � �2.r� / � � � �l�l C..Q.. / � �' � � �"l b O r ko o cQ
If you have any questions about the Open Space Acquisition
program, call Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich at
Open Space Update 770-4526.
This article is part of a series on the City's Open Space
Acquisition program. The City is using the $5 million
authorized by the voters last November to purchase open
s ace. A priority ist of the to 19 rated w ^' �
Y p ated as
presented to the City Council earlier this year. The money
generated by the bond sale is being used for the purchase,
appraisals, and associated studies.
Three more properties are being considered by the Planning
Commission and the Park and Recreation C
Commission. The
sites are Site #153A, the Priory site 39 acres on the south side
of Larpenteur and west of Century, ite #103C, 19.25 acres on
kc ounty Road D Just east of Ari 1•
e ,and Site #140, 2 acres on
the northwest corner of the DNR Willard Munger trail and the
proposed County Trail near English and Frost. The total cost
of these properties is $1,860,000. The City continues to
negotiate with property owners of the remaining sites.
Maplewood
City Council
Mayor ...................... ............................... Gary Bastian
Council Member ............................ Sherry Allenspach
Council Member ...... ............................... Dale Carlson
Council Member . ............................... Marvin Koppen
Council Member ............................. George Rossbach
City Manager ... ............................... Michael McGuire
City Hall
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
612/770 -4500
TDD- 612/770 -4500
'i Hours:
Monday - Friday 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.
s
x
z
G
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Change --Open Space Site 103C
LOCATION: Between Woodlynn and County Road D, west of McKnight Road
DATE: December 1, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Asti On. by. :
ndorsa
Mod,ified�,
]Re j ec ted„ ,,, •r..� .
bat
The City Council directed the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission to
review the purchase of a property for open space. Maplewood's Open Space Committee has
numbered this site 103C. It comprises 23 acres that are between Woodlynn Avenue and County
Road D, west of McKnight Road. (See the maps on pages 4 and 5.) The staff has negotiated a
price of $655,000.
State law requires that the Planning Commission advise the Council whether proposed public
acquisitions follow the Comprehensive Plan. The City has not shown this site on the land use
plan for open space, so we have scheduled a public hearing to consider changing the land use
plan for this area. The changes would be from R -2 (single and double dwellings) and R -3M
(multiple dwellings– medium density) to OS (open space). (See the existing and proposed land
use plan maps on pages 6 and 7.)
BACKGROUND
On November 2, 1993, the voters approved the open space referendum. This vote authorized the
City to sell up to $5 million in general obligation bonds to buy land for open space.
The Open Space Committee recommended that the City Council consider buying open space
from a list of nineteen sites. This list included the fourteen top - rated sites in Maplewood and five
additional sites that the Committee has rated top in their respective neighborhoods, but not City-
wide. Site 103C was one of the five additional sites. Since then, the City has narrowed this list to
nine properties. (See the list on page 8 and the map on page 9.) These are the properties that the
owners have expressed an interest in selling. The City Council has authorized the staff to
negotiate the purchase of one of these sites —Site 142 (Frost Avenue and English Street). The
- City should close on this site by December 1, 1994.
On September 19, 1994, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed Site 103 C. The
Commission made the following observations:
• The power line service damages the area.
• .Maintenance of the easements disrupts the area.
• Williams Brother's Pipelines at the site. (Note that the pipeline is Standard Oil rather than
Williams Brother's)
• A nice stand of oak trees is on the site.
• The site is close to Joy Park. Over 60 acres is proposed to be conveyed from the County.
(Since the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the County has withdrawn their offer
to transfer County park land to the City.)
• This site is possible for prairie grass and wildflowers.
• : Planning Area 5 currently has about 25% of the City park land. Most of the rest of the City
areas have 1 %o, 3 % and 4 %. It would be beneficial for the City to spread the open space into
the neighborhoods that do not have as much park land. Planning areas 1, 2 and 3 (all the land
west of Highway 61) have very little park and open land.
DISCUSSION
The Open Space Committee ranked this site 57 out of 67 sites, but first of the .sites in this
neighborhood. The open space ranking is the lowest of the top nine sites. (See the chart on page
8)
This site has several advantages:
While this neighborhood has a high percentage of park land, it could use more open space.
This neighborhood has 500 acres. The City is planning 100 acres of open space or 20% of the
total acreage in the neighborhood. The average median percentage for all neighborhoods is
27 %. Adding the 23 acres . of Site 103C would increase the percentage of open space to about
25 %. (Note that the OS acreage includes lakes.)
• The power lines and pipelines through this site make it more suitable for open space than
development. The City requires a 100 -foot setback to a pipeline. The City requires a
disclaimer on truth -in- housing reports around high- voltage power lines to advise about
potential health risks.
We received two letters in support of the City buying this site. (See the letters on pages 10 -12.)
The main disadvantage to this site is its low open -space ranking compared to the other top nine
sites and the relatively high price. The City estimates that the cost to buy eight of the top nine
K
sites is $4,462,000 to $5,062,000. (The ninth site is the Kayser site. The City may not be able to
buy this site because of legal problems.) The City has about $4.7 million to spend on property. If
the City spends $655,000 on'Site 1030, there may not be enough money to buy higher- ranked
sites. While Site 103C has open space value, the City should buy open space based on the
rankings developed by the Open Space Committee.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council should take one of the following actions:
A. Table this decision until the City decides not to buy one of the higher- ranked sites.
B. If the City Council decides to buy Site 103C, they should adopt the resolution on page 13.
This resolution changes the land use plan from R -2 (single and double dwellings) and R -3M
(multiple dwellings— medium density) to OS (open space). The City should make this
change because:
1. Maplewood. plans to buy this site for open space.
2. This neighborhood has less planned open space than the average neighborhood.
3. The pipelines and high- voltage power lines through this site make it more desirable for
open space than development.
The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property.
p: sec2- 29 /openlan4. gwo
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line Map
3. Existing Land Use Map -Site 103C
4. Proposed Land Use Map -Site 103C
5. List of Top -Rated Sites
6. Map of Top -Rated Sites
7. Letter from Char Brooker
8. Letter from Margaret Kohring
9. Land Use Plan Change Resolution
3
Attachment . 1
B
. WE
Z
N
AVE.
a
W
0
4J • .. • OR
E
It ''
r
GETVAJS GERVi IS AVE. •.
CT. •.
•
CAME A VE
CASTLE AVE. :. • o
COPE AVE. 1 0 �-
n A •
LOCATION MAP
4
COUN'TY � • • • ' • � • �
RbVW O • •• • . .
rrr�rrrv;{rrr..►:rr �;rrrrr {r � A V F
o rs : : : : : .::.: : :•: ; :::: :::•:::::::•:•:::•:: f :� : .:f ;; :•: ; :• ,Q WOODIYNN
.:•.:::• :: :.• ::: AVE • ,o D ENNER A
AVE •
�n
19 Z o 0 2. ,� w 2.
c 70 •
LYDi�I o. AVE. ..
/
V ? 3 19 w `
AVE.< cc '
STANDRIDGE •. • ..
�MAPLE LA_
go
2 •
OC r '
B EAM A
KAPU VfEW AVE. 0 • :.: ,..: •• • •, . • .• .
RADA 72 � AVE.
MESS481 AV g 4 0, 0
w
RAMSEY �
NORTH SAINT PA COUN Y
CO
w KOHUAAN
AVE -
31:
o ••
cn
^ EDGENILL RD. 6S
m ...�
4
N
Attachment 2
--$ �.� COUNTY ROAD D--
- - -
I
• �. A - Y4 �
' «\ loo o• +to �o' o loo•3 3
2G3. is
C0 Mac.
• �- N 10 ( ,
t3 .3oac. 10 3 C N N N 04 �y 3113
2090 N IN' w� N � N ) `N -
;. 3� .
A `_ 214, 0 (08 r M `
(40) VQ or 4, 9a ac,;- .. ., 3095
%
1 � 1
wATEa zo
+� l 030
o? t
Q' ,329.14 • IQ SS:Z� �!� T sr i7 7� _
POWER LINES 3, 1. 0 2 s 1 3�) 4 4 5 6 7 N N 1
1 4 Q S
WOODLY
-- -- - - - -- ^ I — A , - -- 0 2
Jbig er I• �3 S8) 4.1 A L � 03) 0. L. A
L. •
g p - - -SEC P4A 1 COPY FOR O CTAL LS
A It
r
......rte - S r^� .o
� — p
40,
9441 a 1.10 110• 110 VP
ON
(3Z) a (tb)
.4s
6 7 0 8 1 � ^e 23 o a
h � �)
T M
c
12079 2 /3 or Q N1 • _; s- 1p N (37) .� si1'+� ~.
a.. o
0 ,0
(35) o
ep� (mil •+ ! � r 15 !a 17 19 21 0. 2
4 2
a 039)
e � 1 r��
(3 a �� �• y � 30 r too' t • 1 �'
C* � P� (Z-0 '� `
04
_
.33 it~
�� .�7ae. a 00
14 - t�lo5.73 -• �� 20 0
vt: 4,z AL rs vt s� (2�� :s ' (to)
N N 0 D a E R E is 14 15 ._ 1 2
5 6 7 11 12 32C�) s� no
4 h /' 9+ I M o� t s �19)
( 22� LI) `��.�C'S� �S6) �2� t!�'�r (Z5 a r - - or - - --
b ' 11 - r - -- • 17' 33 w
fit 4 r 6:0M o =1st �i�i�M10NN I�GY'1°tA�3 4 �. - i7oc b N 9
-;...r.'.•- — - - -- - — - 23•« • I ` L....r. 4s 1 s -1so y. i asr's�a3�i
Dec
Lis co 1 19 co 1 IO7.G�' as IOI..i' 100' 1oi.i• a' 0 1os s�' a ►o :.. 3a a loo y
30 # 1 2 3 2 1 .t 4: i° 1 2 n 3 0
t ?' 9 to 2 +�
PROPERTY LINE MAP
N
5
Attachment 5
TOP NINE OPEN SPACE SITES FROM THE OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE'S
RECOMMENDED OPEN SPACE LIST
8
Open SSpace
Ranking
Citv ID#
67 Sites
Pro ertv Location. -Owner
Acres
Estimated Cost
153A
1
Priory
39
$1,200,000
151
6
East of Rice, South of B Zittel & Oren
29
+
142
6
English and Frost
24
$827,000
161B
6
South of Linwood Ave., East of Sterling St.-
30
Kayser
108
9
Hazelwood and Beam -- Pearson
8
+
116
13
Near Spoon Lake — Kuslich & Pillsbury
32
+
173
21
Sterling, south of Carver
40
+
140
38
Crossing of Trails, N. of Frost on English
2
$80
1030
57
Between County Road D and Woodlynn
23
$655,000
+ Total estimate to buy these four sites is $1.7 million
Appraisals being done, but may be difficult to acquire because of legal
pp g
complications.
8
5
EF a M- W- �, NM
idim
I A
/150
r- r
Attachment 6
r, 0 �3c
132
i53A�
1538
156
r
El ""A
Maplewood
OPEN SPACE
Top Rated Areas
THE TOP SITES ARE CIRCLED
9
wMLW,bM wit
g um
'
ffw i
17� `
I
k1 Frpek
i
zj 7Z Whw
� U u�,
ji
An.Evaluation of the Natural Features of the Woodlynn Avenue
and County Road D Site -
The acreage here is evolving from its previous use as a working
grazed over farm to an open meadow with oak stands.
The presence of high power lines is an advantage in this meadow
environment because of the use by raptors. During migrations and
during the summer, hawks use the high perches to locate prey and
to rest.
There is a significant breeding population of pheasants.
Songbirds which are on the decline because of habitat destruction
of open meadows are increasing in number as the meadow evolves.
Field sparrows, clay colored sparrows, fox sparrows, and meadowlarks
have taken up residence. Eastern kingbirds, cardinals, swallows,
purple martins, goldfinches, pine siskins,.as well as the more
common chickadees and nuthatches utilize the meadow for breeding
and food supplies
,The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has visited this site
over the past two years when told of several reports of Loggerhead
Shrike sitings. This Shrike is endangered in Minnesota. It is
possible that migrating Shrikes may nest in this habitat as 'more
meadows get developed. They eat insects, rodents, and occassionally
small birds. The habitat of brush, old fence posts, and meadow
is ideal. The MN DNR will continue to monitor this site.
This site would be ideal for several bluebird trails.
The site is part of a natural bird corridor that starts at Lakewood
Community College, to the YMCA property. to this site, and over to
Silver Lake or Kohlman Lake.
There have been successful dens and woodchuck dens in the past
three years.
The area could be enhanced with more perch sites, keeping the brushy
areas, introducing native prairie grasses, and oak regeneration.
10
T H E
TRUST
F O R
PUBLIC
LAND
Lam'
Conserving Land
for People
21 November 1994
Gretchen Maglich
Assistant City Manager
City of Maplewood
1880 E..County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Gretchen,
Attachment 8
on behalf of the Trust for Public Land, I would like to recommend
that the City of Maplewood acquire the Conklin and Wesleyan Church
tracts as part of the Maplewood Open Space Acquisition Program. My
recommendation is based on the location of the property in the City,
the natural values of the land, the price and the willingness of the
landowners to sell.
If any part of Maplewood needs open space it is the area around the
Maplewood Mall. The Conklin property provides a natural buffer to
the neighborhood from the mall buildings, lights and traffic. As
the vegetation continues to mature, there will soon'be a complete
vegetative barrier for the neighborhood.
.The majestic trees on the property provide homes for many animals
and the meadow is a splash of color as the summer wildflowers bloom.
Despite the commercial location, a walk on the Conklin property
provides the feeling that one is far from the City, The day I
visited the property a red - tailed hawk circled lazily around and
swooped down to pounce on what looked like a mouse. How many cities
can say there is this much wildlife in their city?
It is remarkable that both Mr. Conklin and the Wesleyan Church have
agreed at the same time to sell their properties ensuring that the
City of Maplewood will have a large open space unit. Both of these
landowners have waited for'the selection and approval process to be
completed, with the understanding that the properties were on the
approved acquisition list..
The Trust for Public Land
Midwest Region
420 North Fifth Street
Suite 865
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 338 -8494
Fax (612) 338 -8467
JAM
11
NOV 13-
n
on behalf of the Trust for Public Land, I would like to recommend
that the City of Maplewood acquire the Conklin and Wesleyan Church
tracts as part of the Maplewood Open Space Acquisition Program. My
recommendation is based on the location of the property in the City,
the natural values of the land, the price and the willingness of the
landowners to sell.
If any part of Maplewood needs open space it is the area around the
Maplewood Mall. The Conklin property provides a natural buffer to
the neighborhood from the mall buildings, lights and traffic. As
the vegetation continues to mature, there will soon'be a complete
vegetative barrier for the neighborhood.
.The majestic trees on the property provide homes for many animals
and the meadow is a splash of color as the summer wildflowers bloom.
Despite the commercial location, a walk on the Conklin property
provides the feeling that one is far from the City, The day I
visited the property a red - tailed hawk circled lazily around and
swooped down to pounce on what looked like a mouse. How many cities
can say there is this much wildlife in their city?
It is remarkable that both Mr. Conklin and the Wesleyan Church have
agreed at the same time to sell their properties ensuring that the
City of Maplewood will have a large open space unit. Both of these
landowners have waited for'the selection and approval process to be
completed, with the understanding that the properties were on the
approved acquisition list..
The Trust for Public Land
Midwest Region
420 North Fifth Street
Suite 865
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 338 -8494
Fax (612) 338 -8467
JAM
11
21 November 1994
Page 2
The appraisals for both properties are discounted because of the
power line crossing the properties making this acquisition a good
value for the City of Maplewood.
Based on the reasonable price, the open space values, the
willingness of the landowners and the beauty of the. land, I urge you
to approve the acquisition of the Conklin and Wesleyan Church
properties,
Sincerely,
Margaret A. Kohring
Special Projects
12
Attachment 9
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WI1EREAS, the Director of Community Development .proposed a change to the City's land
use plan from R-2 (single and double dwellings) and R -3M (multiple dwellings— medium
density) to OS (open space).
W]HEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property located between Woodlynn
Ave nue and County Road D west of McKnight Road.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On December 5, 1994, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. The City staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve the plan amendment.
2. On December 12, 1994 the City Council discussed this land use plan change. They
considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City star
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described
change for the following reasons:
1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space.
. 2. This neighborhood has less planned open space than the average neighborhood.
3. The pipelines and high- voltage power lines through this site make it more desirable for
open space than development.
The City shall not make these changes until the City closes on the property.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on
) 199 — .
13