Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1994 09-26 City Council Packet
AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., 'Monday, September 26, 1994 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 94 -19 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting, September 8, 1994 2. Minutes of Council /Manager Meeting, September 12, 1994 3. Minutes of Meeting 94 -18, (September 12, 1994) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation: CITIES WEEK, September 25 - October 2 F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under. the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will 'be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Third Quarter Payments - 1994 Contracts with Parkside and East County Line Fire Departments 3. Write Off Uncollectible False Alarm Charges 4. Mounds Park Academy 5. Conditional Use Permit Review: 743 N. Century Avenue (Holiday Express Station) 6. Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Canada Woods East 7. Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Beth Heights Addition 8. Approve Job Description for Maplewood Parks & Recreation Commissioners 9. House Demolition and Assessment - 1832 Gervais Court G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M.: Project 89 -04, County Road C Street and Utility Improvements Assessment Hearing 2. 7:15 P.M.: Project 93 -08, Sterling Street /Schaller Drive Street and Utility Improvements - Assessment Hearing H. AWARD OF BIDS 1. Backhoe Replacement I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Phalen Lake Townhomes Preliminary Plat 2. Commercial Setback Ordinance (2nd Reading - 4 Votes Required) 3. Outside Storage Ordinance (2nd Reading) 4. Liquor Ordinance, Community Center (2nd Reading) 5. Ordinance to Set Recycling Rates for 1995 (2nd Reading) J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Maplewood Mall Traffic Improvements, Project 89 -21 2. Shoreland Ordinance (1st Reading) 3. Conditional Use Permit Review: Crestview Townhouses K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Open Space Progress 2. 3. N. ADJOURNMENT rr i E CITY COUNCIUMANAGER WORKSHOP OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 4:30 p.m., Thursday, September 8, 1994 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Acting Mayor Carlson at 4:52 p.m. B. ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present (Arrived at 5:03 p.m.) Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present Councilperson Dale Carlson Present Councilpers,on Mary Koppen Present Council person George Rossbach Absent Others Present:' — - — - --- - - - - -- City.Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City .Manager Gretchen Maglich Parks &Recreation Director Bruce Anderson Director of Public Works Ken Haider Director of Community Development Geoff Olson C. A AGENDA The following items were added to the agenda E. ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCES 1. Open Space Committee 2. Fire Department Contracts 3. Budget Meeting 1 I Councilmember Allenspach moved that the agenda be aparoved as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and approved. Ayes: Allenspach, Carlson, and Koppen y p Absent: Bastian and Rossbach COMMUNITY CENTER EVENTS D. COMMU , POLICIES AND CONTRACTS City Manager McGuire stated that some service agreements for the operations of the Community Center were presented for City Council consideration. Rather than have the Council review each individual service agreement, Council approval for staff to enter into such agreements is being sought to allow for the greatest flexibility. The agreements would be supervised by the City Manger and the Director of Parks &Recreation. Mayor Bastian arrived at 5:03 p.m. Following discussion about length of the agreement, types of video games to be provided, and food and beverage vendors, Councilmember Koppen moved that staff be authorized to enter into service agreements necessary for the operations of the Community Center. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Allenspach and was approved. Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen Absent: Rossbach City Manager McGuire informed the City Council that there had been a request fora 3 month membership to the Community Center as a prize for the winner of the Partnership's Red Ribbon Campaign Poster Contest. There was considerable discussion about using a three month membership as a promotional tool. It was the consensus of the City Council to place this item on the September 12, 1994 agenda to ask for Council approval to provide ten three -month memberships paid for by the Charitable Gambling Fund. These gift memberships would be given away during the Grand Opening events including the Red Ribbon Parade on October 8. City Manager McGuire reviewed the list of upcoming Community Center events related to its opening. There was some discussion about the guest list for each event. Since the invitations for the formal dinner on October 14 must be mailed by the middle of next week, Councilmembers were asked to submit their thoughts and names by early next week. -E. ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCES Director of Public Works Ken Haider reviewed the City's approved LCMR grant which will fund the development of an innovative stormwater management system in a Maplewood neighborhood. Ms. Sherri Busse, DNR, was present to inform the Council- about aRamsey- Washington Metro 2 Watershed District wetlands setbacks model ordinance. This special project will focus on the functions: and values of wetland areas and make recommendations for city ordinances throughout the Watershed. District Ms. Busse also explained the DNR received a McKnight grant of $15,000 for a unique project to inventory natural areas with an urban area. The DNR has selected. Maplewood for this project and is requesting Council approval to participate. With the grant funds, an intern would be working with the Community Development and Engineering departments to inventory natural areas, record ecological qualities, and make management recommendations for those properties. Following some discussion, Councilmember Allenspach moved that the City accept the services of the intern through the DNR Grant make the necessary budget adjustments and authorize staff to begin the nroiect. The motion was seconded by Councilme.mber Koppen and was approved. Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen Absent: Rossbach There was also some discussion .about the upcoming Watershed District's wetland setback model ordinance project. It was the consensus of the Council to place this item on the regular Council agenda on Monday, September 12. 1. Open Space Committee The City Manager distributed the Open Space Committee's minutes that were recently mailed to the Mayor and City staff. The City Manager asked the Council for clarification of the Committee's role in the Open Space program. It was the consensus of the Council that the formal committee's role has ended, and any involvement of the committee will be on a minimal and informal basis. Members of the committee would be contacted for their input if the. properties change from their original configuration or if there is a decision to seek property not on the top 19 list. The Committee members can continue to meet at City Hall as a citizens group -not as a formal City - appointed committee. 2. Fire .Department Contracts City Manager McGuire stated that the three Fire Departments were mailed the 1994 -95 Fire Department contracts including the addendum which were approved by the City Council last month. The Fire Departments' attorney notified the City that the addendum was not acceptable. Following some discussion, it was the consensus of the City Council that they had formally established the Fire Department Contract Committee and that a meeting should be called to begin work on the recommendations. 3. Budget Meeting Mayor Bastian moved that the Proposed 1995 Budget Meeting be scheduled for Thursday. September 12. 1994 at 4:30 D.M. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Allenspach and was approved. Ayes: ANenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen Absent: Rossbach F. RECREATIONAL FIRE BURNING PERMITS City Manager McGuire stated this item was placed on the agenda due to Councilmember and resident interest to make the system more user-friendly. The Council intern, Ms. Shelley Mahre, will be present at a future Council meeting to provide the details of the proposed changes. G. OPEN SPACE UPDATE .Assistant City Manager Maglich provided a summary of the acquisition program. There was some discussion about utilizing the knowledge of former employees of Burlington Northern regarding the English /Frost site. H. OTHER BUSINESS City Manager McGuire reported that the City has 22 new employees -since January 1, many of which 'have not been introduced to the City Council Mayor Bastian recommended that the new employees be :introduced to the City Council during the Employee /Commissioners event at the Community Center on September 28. Mayor Bastian stated that he would place the subject of naming City property or facilities after former mayors on the September 12 agenda I. FUTURE TOPICS There was no discussion of this item. J. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:23 p.m. c 1. i 4 CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP A OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of MAPLEWOOD 4:30 p.m., Thursday, September 12, 1994 Maplewood Room, City Hall MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, Cit Y Hail. The meeting was Called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:39 p.m. Be ROLL CALL Mayor Gary Bastian Present C Sherry Allenspach Present Councilmember Dale Carlson Present Councilmember Mary Koppen Present ,Councilmember George Rossbach Present Others Present: City Manager Michael McGuire Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich Director of Finance Daniel Faust C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Carlson and was approved. Ayes: All D. BUDGET OVERVIEW City Manager McGuire stated that the proposed 1995 Budget differed from previous budgets, because it emphasizes .performance and department goads rather than line item costs. He highlighted the major objectives of each department. Some additional goals were suggested for departments including: City Clerk- Administration and Deputy Registrar: 1) complete automation; 2) the development of customer service, user - friendly instructional aids; and 3) quicker service. Community Development - Administration: Amend Objective 1 to read "Provide timely information for the preparation of the capital improvement plan." 1 General Government - Charitable Gambling: Eliminate four proposed objectives and replace with "Ti Y q funding review of requests for fundin under the policies established by the Council." General Government - Emergency Management: Amend Objective 1. to read "Disseminate public g Y g information on Emergency Management issues in Maplewood in Motion cable TV, local news papers, and radio." Amend Objective 6. to read "Conduct semi- annual #5 exercises for City Hall, Public Works and Community Center staff." General Government - 1 Legal: Add an objective that states "Timely review of bond applications by g bond counsel." Parks & Recreation - Community Center: Amend Objective 9. to read "By April 1, 1995, establish a cl g, p p eanin repair, and replacement program that maintains the appearance of the Community Center." Parks & Recreation - Nature Center: Add following objective: "Develop plans for how open space can be integrated into Nature Center function /programs." Public Safety - Administration: Add an objective that reads "Prepare and distribute quarterly reports of crime analysis to City Council." Add an objective that. reads "Prepare a job description for the new Y Y position of administrative assistant." Public Works - Street Maintenance: Amend Objective 3 to read "Complete a neighborhood street overlay p g ram program b August 15, 1995." Add an objective to read "Continue snow removal of Y g sidewalks and intersections on White Bear Avenue as time permits." Public Works - Vehicle & Equipment Maintenance: Add an objective that reads "Research the P Y ossibilit of maintaining ambulances, fire trucks and police squads by City employees." Finance Director Faust p resented the Debt Service section of the proposed 1995 Budget. He stated that due to the Open Space bonds, the total tax levy is a 6.9% increase. rather than a 1.5% increase. E. AMBULANCE RATES FOR 1995 Following some discussion, Mayor Bastian moved that Resolution No. 94 -09 -100 be adopted as .resented. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and was approved. RESOLUTION ADOPTING 1995 AMBULANCE RATES WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood is authorized to impose reasonable charges for emergency and paramedic ambulance services by Minnesota Statutes 471.476 and by special laws g Y p (Chapter 426, Laws of 1975, and Chapter 743, Laws of 1978); and WHEREAS, the paramedic ambulance services are partly financed by property taxes; and WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge non- residents a higher rate than residents for services rendered; and WHEREAS, it is fair and reasonable to charge for services rendered based upon the .distance a person is transported and by type of services provided; i.e., basic or advanced life support services as defined by Medicare. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following charges es shall be effective January 1, 1995: Residents Non - Residents Base rates: Basic . ambulance services $240 $265 Advanced life support ambulance services $465 $510 Rate per mile transported $7.10 $7.10 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that there shall be no charge for services rendered when the. patient is not transported, when the patient is transported to the detoxification center, or when the patient is transported in a squad car. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if more than one person is transported, the ambulance charges will be pro - rated between the people transported. Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen Nays: Rossbach F. ORDINANCE TO SET RECYCLING RATES FOR 1995 (First Read ng} There was some discussion about the costs associated with the recycling center near the Public Y g Works building. It was the consensus of the Council that a report about the costs should be presented to them at the end of 1994. At that time, a program of quarterly clean -up days will be compared to the recycling center program Mayor Bastian moved that first reading of Ordinance No. 7.24 be approved to increase the recycling . charge effective 1 -1 -95. The motion was seconded b Y Councilmember Koppen and was approved. ORDINANCE NO. 724 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RECYCLING CHARGES The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Sec. 16 -58 is hereby amended to read as follows: All residential property shall be billed $3.05 per unit per quarter for solid waste reduction and recycling. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 1995. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk K] Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Koppen Nays; Rossbach G. BUDGET POLICY FOR COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS FUND City g p Manager McGuire explained that the proposed policy allows the Community Center to operate with a "bottom line" philosophy. The total revenue and expenditures are not important. What is important is the net income. Mayor Bastian indicated that the resolution be revised to include a provision that the Community Center income statement. be placed on the Counci.i agenda quarterly for discussion. Followin g some discussion, ,Ma.yor Bastian moved that revised Resolution. No. 94 -09- 101 be adopted to formalize this Communitv Center operations. policy and ado tan initial net income budget for 1994. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Koppen and was approved. RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET POLICIES FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER OPERATIONS AND ADOPTION OF INITIAL 1994 BUDGET WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Maplewood to operate the Community Center as a business, and WHEREAS, it is important that management have the flexibility to incur expenses as needed so that customers can be properly served, and WHEREAS, the Finance Department will prepare and distribute a monthly income statement to monitor the financial transactions for the Community Center operations. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the annual budget for the Community Center Operations Fund consist solely of a planned net income amount, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Center income statement be placed on the Council agenda quarterly for discussion, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that City management staff shall have the flexibility to incur expenses as needed so that customers can be properly served, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the budgeted 1994 net income for the Community Center Operations Fund be set at $15,810. Ayes: All .H. INSURANCE FOR OPEN MEETING LAW Mayor Bastian moved that the insurance coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust for open meeting law defense costs be obtained for the estimated premium cost of $1,600. The motion was seconded by Gouncilmember Koppen and was approved. Ayes: All i, SELECTION OF DATES FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 1995 BUDGET.AND PROPERTY TAXES After reviewing the schedule, Mayor Bastian moved that a the initial hearing be scheduled for 7:00 .m. on Tuesday, November 29' b the continuation hearing needed be scheduled for 5:00 .m. on Frida December 9' and c the final hearin to ado t the tax levy and budget be scheduled for 7:00 p.rn. Monday December 12. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Carlson and was approved. Ayes: All J. ADOPTION OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 1995 Mayor Bastian moved that Resolution NO. 94 -09_ 1 02, dopted which giv_es_ to the Proposed tax levy for 1994 a able in 1995 in the amount of $8,572,900 less $1,593A 15 for HACA. The motion was seconded b Counci (member Ko en and was approved. Y pP pp RESOLUTION PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED TAX LEVY FOR 1994 PAYABLE IN 1995 WHEREAS, State law requires that the City Council give preliminary approval of a proposed tax levy for 1994 payable in 1995 by September 15, 1994, and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Proposed 1995 Budget and has determined the amount of the proposed tax levy payable in 1995 which is the maximum amount that will be levied and WHEREAS, the proposed property tax levy certified must be after the deduction of the homestead and agricultural credit aid (RAGA), and WHEREAS, the 1995 HACA for the City of Maplewood is $1,593,415. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA THAT the ro osed tax levy for 1994 payable in 1995 in the amount of p p Y p Y $8,572,900 less $1,593,415 for HACA is hereby given preliminary approval. Ayes: All K. OTHER BUSINESS Several Councilmembers stated that they liked the new budget format using department objectives. L. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m. 5 � MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL Olt, Olt, 7, .00 P.M., Monday, September 12, 1994 Counc Chambers, Munici Building c Meet No. 94-18 A. TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was.oalled to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. CALL: Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Dal H. Carlson, Councilmember Present Marvin.C. Koppen, Councilmember Present George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of Meeting 94 -17 (August 22, 1994) Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the minut of Meeti No . , , 94 (August 22. 1994) as corrected: Page 15, Item J,5b: "Councilmember Carlson moved ." Page 19, Item M,lb: "is now available." Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended: Ll Environmental Ordinance L2 Naming L3 Inspections L4 Mayor's Update L5 Dog Control L6 Cable TV Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all EA. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS NONE 1 9 -12 -94 F. CONSENT AGENDA : Councilmember Carlson moved, seconded by. Councilmember Koppen: ayes. all, to aDDrove the consent agenda i tems F -1 and F - 3 thru as reco mmended. Item F . voted on separate1y�. 1. Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 552,457.21 $ 235.711.88 $ 788,169.09 PAYROLL: $ 230,636.95 $ 47,855.86 $ 278,492.81 $1.066.661.90 Checks #2960 - #3063 Dated 8 -11 -94 thru 8 -31 -94 Checks #14698 - #14861 Dated 9 -12 -94 Total per attached voucher /check register Payroll Checks #42208 thru #42404 Dated . 8 26 -94 Payroll Deduction Checks #42409 thru #42425 dated 8 -26 -94 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 20 Budget Transfer for Purchase of Software VOTED ON SEPARATELY AFTER F -15. 3. Parks & Recreation Commission Resignation Accepted the resignation from the Park and Recreation Commission of Ellis J. Wyatt, who will be moving out of Maplewood. 4. Nature Center Donation Accepted with thanks a donation of $550 from the Maplewood Mall Charity Fund to be used for the Junior Volunteer Program, which is coordinated by the Nature Center. 5. Balloon Sign: 2950 White Bear Avenue (Petclips) Approved a ten -day sign permit for Pet Clips to have a balloon sign on the roof of 2950 White Bear Avenue, subject to the, s ign being no taller. than eighteen feet above the top of the parapet. 6. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2785 White Bear Ave. (Ramsey County District Court) Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for the Ramsey Count y District Court at 2785 White Bear Avenue, subject to the original 2 9 -12 -94 conditions of the Permit. This CUP will not be reviewed again unless there is a problem. 7. Conditional Use Permit Review: 3001 White Bear Ave. (Circus Pizza) Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for Circus Pizza at Maplewood Mall, subject to the August 8, 1983 conditions of the Permit. This CUP will be reviewed again in five years. 8. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2135 Birmingham St. (Weaver Elementary School) Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for Madeline Weaver Elementary School, 2135 Birmingham Street. This CUP will be reviewed again on October 24, 1994 since the required conditions have not been met as of this date. 9. Conditional Use Permit Review: Highway 61 (Lacktorin) Reviewed and approved an extension of the Conditional Use Permit for Charles Lacktorin to sell used motor vehicles at a site on the East side of Highway 61 South of County Road D. Mr. Lacktorin is still preparing the site to meet the conditions required for approval of the CUP. This CUP will be reviewed again on July 10 , 1995. 10. Conditional Use Permit Review: 2271 White Bear Ave. (Flemings Auto Service) Reviewed and approved for renewal the Conditional Use Permit for Fleming's Auto Service at 2271 White Bear Avenue. All conditions of the CUP have been met. This CUP will be reviewed again in five years. 11. Final Plat: Oak Ridge Estates Approved the Oak Ridge Estates final plat, subject to the County recording the deed restrictions and Covenants required by the City. 12. Salaries for Selected Community Center Positions Approved the following negotiated hourly pay rates for A.F.S.C.M.E. positions: Start 1 Yr. 3 Yr Building Custodian $ 6.56 $ 7.38 $ 8.20 Customer Service Representative 7.70 8.66 9.62 Senior Building Maintenance Worker* 10.56 11.88 13.20 *Employees promoted to the class of Senior Building Maintenance Worker will be placed at the closest step within the new pay range that is equal to or higher than their current rate of pay. 3 9 -12 -94 13. Revision to Metro Supervisory Association Labor Agreement Approved the following negotiated amendments to the Metro Supervisory Association contract to include the newly established part -time supervisory employees, to be effective for regular part-time employees starting on or after August 29, 1994: Article 15 - Vacation: (Section 15.1) Regular part -time employees shall accrue vacation on a pro -rated basis consistent with hours worked. Article 16 - Holidays: (Section 16.3) Regular part -time employees shall receive holiday pay (including personal holidays) on a pro- rated basis consistent with hours worked. Article 17 - Sick Leave: (Section 17.1) Regular part -time employees shall accrue sick leave on a pro -rated basis consistent with hours worked. All other conditions of accrual and use of sick leave for regular part -time employees shall be the same as for full -time employees. (Section 17.2 - Revision of first sentence) Full -time and regular part -time employees hired after May 19, 1978 are provided, at said employee's discretion, the following optional sick leave conversion program in lieu of severance pay provided in Article 19. (Section 17.3 - Revision of first sentence) On December 31st of each year, a full -time or regular part -time employee with 800 hours or more of accumulated sick leave etc. Article 21 - Insurance: (Section 21.5 - add at the end of paragraph) This includes regular part -time employees in the unit. Article 29 - Merit Pay: - (Add at the end of paragraph) This includes regular part -time employees in the unit. Appendix B: (Add the following after the description of deferred compensation contributions) Regular part -time employees are eligible to receive pro -rated employer contributions toward deferred compensation under the same conditions as for full -time employees. 14. Contingency Account Request Authorized a transfer of $8,600 from the General Fund Contingency Account to 101 -110- 000 -4410 ($1,600), 101 - 110 - 000 -4640 ($1,500), 101- 102 - 000 -4360 ($5,000), and 101 -102- 000 -4330 ($500) to cover unexpected expenditures in the City Hall Operations and Executive Divisions of the General Government Department. 4 9 -12 -94 15. Langer and Regan Assessments Approved the following Resolutions regarding Improvement Project 88 -14: 94 - 09 - 103 VACATION OF ASSESSMENT AND REASSESSMENT OF PARCEL - REGAN WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the Public Improvement Project No. 88 -14, Gervais Avenue improvement, which was adopted by the City Council on September 13, 1993; the following parcels were assessed as follows: Parcel I.D. #10.29 -22 -32 -0004; amount of assessment $14,600.00 Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0003; amount of assessment $ 7,300.00 WHEREAS, Donald B. Regan has agreed to a reassessment of the following parcels in the following amounts: 1. Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0003; in the amount of $4,468.00 2. Parcel I.D. #10- 29- 22- 32- 0004; in the amount of $4,468.00 WHEREAS, Donald B. Regan has waived through Stipulation, the requirements for notice and hearing pursuant to §429.071, subd.2. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Maplewood, State of Minnesota as follows: 1) The following assessments for the following parcels is hereby set aside and vacated: Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0003; amount $ 7,300.00 - set aside and vacated Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0004; amount $14,600.00 - set aside and vacated 2) The following parcels are hereby reassessed in the following amounts: A) Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0003, reassessed in the amount of $4,468.00. The property owner shall have the right to prepay the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without interest from September 13, 1994 and October 29, 1994, to the City Clerk at City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25% of the total assessment has been authorized by Ordinance. The rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period, is proposed to be 9.0 percent commencing on the date of adoption by the City Council and running through the year 2013. The legal description of the aforementioned parcel is as follows: 5 9 -12 -94 The North 204.7 feet of the North 112 of the West 19 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, except the West 433 feet thereof. B) Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0004, is reassessed in the amount of $4,468.00. The property owner shall have the right to prepay the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without interest from September 13 1994 and October 29, 1994, to the City Clerk at City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25% of the total assessment has been authorized by Ordinance. The rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period, is proposed to be 9.0 percent commencing on the date of adoption by the City Council and running through the year 2013. The parcel is described as follows: The West 433 feet of the North 204.7 feet of the North 112 of the West 19 acres of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22. 94 - 09 - 104 VACATION OF ASSESSMENT AND REASSESSMENT OF PARCEL - LANGERS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the Public Improvement Project No. 88 -14, Gervais Avenue Improvement, which was adopted by the City Council on September 13, 1993; the following parcel were assessed as follows: Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0002; amount of assessment $10,767.00 WHEREAS, Hartford Langer, Florence Langer and Jay T. Langer, hereinafter referred to as 'Langers' have agreed to a reassessment of the following parcel in the following amount: Parcel I.D. #10- 29- 22 -32- 0002; in the amount of $6,590.30 WHEREAS, Langers have waived through Stipulation, the requirements for notice and hearing pursuant to §429.071, subd.2. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Maplewood, State of Minnesota as follows: 1) The following assessment for the following parcel is hereby set aside and vacated: Parcel I.D. #10- 29 -22 -32 -0002; amount $10,767.30 -set aside and vacated 6 9 -12 -94 2) The following parcel is hereby reassessed in the following amount: A) Parcel I. D. #10- 2.9- 22- 32- 0002,.. reassessed in the amount of $6,590.30. The property owner shall have the right to prepay the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without interest from September 13, 1994 and October 29, 1994, to the City Clerk at City Hall, 1830 East County Road B, Maplewood, Minnesota. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25% of the total. assessment has been authorized by Ordinance. The rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period, is proposed to be 9.0 percent commencing on the date of adoption by the City Council and running through the year 2013. The legal description of the aforementioned parcel is as follows: All that part of the North 112 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 29, Range 22, except the West 19 acres thereof, which lies Westerly of the right of way of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, except that part of said tract described in the notice of l i s pendens recorded in office of Register of Deeds of Ramsey County, Minnesota in "1 067" Mtges 589, and except also, that a part of said tract which l i e s Southerly of a l i n e running parallel with and distant 112.5 feet Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on West line of said Section 10 distant 729.7 feet South of the West 1/4 corner thereof, thence run Easterly at an angle of 89 degrees 56 With said West Section l i n e (when measured from North to East) for 1500 feet, and there terminating, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. 2. Budget Transfer for Purchase of Software a. Councilmember Carlson moved to authorize a transfer of $945 from the Contingency Account for the purchase of software to process Medical Assistance. ambulance c_ 1 a i_m,. . Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Allenspech, Carlson, Koppen G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. (7:10 P.M.): Commercial Setback Ordinance (1st Reading) a. Mayor. Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a requested amendment to City Code relative to setback requirements. 7 9 -12 -94 b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report d. Commissioner Kittridge presented the Planning Commission report. e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following persons were heard: Cliff Schneider, 561 Marnie, the applicant f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing. g. Mayor Bastian moved_ to approve first reading of the. Ordinance to change the setback repui rement between a commerci a1 use and a resi Bence pl anned for commercial use, and to request staff to view other areas that might be affected. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Outside Storage Ordinance (2nd Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian moved to table for further clarification of language in the Outside Storage Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Moratorium on Clinics a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. 8 9 -12 -94 d., Councilmember Rossbach moved to extend the moratorium on new or expanding clinics- until_December 12. 1994. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes all 2. Searle Street Storm Sewer, Project 93 -14 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. Order Assessment Roll c. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and, moved its adoption: 94 - 09 - 105 ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have received bids for the Searle Street Storm Sewer Improvement, City Project 93 -14. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets .affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City office for inspection FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the Council thereof. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Order Assessment Hearing d. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 09 - 106 ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of Searle Street Storm Sewer Improvements, City Project 93 -14, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 9 9 -12 -94 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. A hea ri ng sha 11 be hel d on the 10th day of October, 1994, at the City Hall at 7:00 p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 3. East Shore Drive Storm Sewer, Project 94 -06 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. Approve Plans and Specifications & Authorize Advertisement for Bids c. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 09 - 107 APPROVING PLANS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on August 8, 1994, plans and specifications for East Shore Drive Storm Sewer Improvement, City Project 94 -06, have been prepared by (or under the direction of) the City Engineer, who has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF THE City OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and ordered placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 10 9 -12 -94 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be p ublished twice, at least ten days before the date set for bid opening, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened and considered- by the Council at 10 a.m., on the 27th day of September, 1994, at the City Hall and that no bids shall be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a certified check or bid bond, payable to the City of Maplewood, Minnesota for five percent of the amount of such bid. 3. The City Clerk and City. Engineer are hereby authorized and instructed to receive open, and read aloud bids received at the time and place herein noted, and to tabulate the bids received. The Council will consider the bids, and the award of a contract, at the regular City Council meeting of October 10, 1994. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all Order Assessment Roll d. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 09 - 108 ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have received bids for the improvement of East Shore Drive Storm Sewer Improvement, City Project 94 -06. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA that the City Clerk and City Engineer shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land abutting on the streets affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and they shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in the City office for inspection. FURTHER, the Clerk shall, upon completion of such proposed assessment notify the Council thereof. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 11 9 -12 -94 Order Assessment Hearing e. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 94 - 09 - 109 ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HEARING WHEREAS, the Clerk and the Engineer have, at the direction of the Council, prepared an assessment roll for the construction of East Shore Drive Storm Sewer Improvement, City Project 94 -06, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: 1 . A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 1994, at the City Hall at 7:15 p. m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published in the official newspaper, at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said assessment. 3 . The notice of hearing shat 1 state the date , time and place of hearing, the general nature of the improvement the area to be assessed, that the proposed assessment roll is on file with the Clerk and that written or oral objections will be considered. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 4. Trails a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. No one appeared. 12 9 -12 -94 Trail Width d . Councilmember Carlson moved to. continue us i n 8-foot. t r a i l s . in Maplewood. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Trail Setback e. Councilmember Carlson moved to set a minimum setback of 15 feet between houses and trails. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all Ordinance f. Councilmember Carlson moved to direct staff to, prepare an ordinance establ i shi na pavement and right , of -way widths for trails, Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 5. Investigation of Former City Dump Site a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian moved to authorize staff to enter into an agreement with Atech, Associates. Inc for Phase 1 investi_as tion of the former Maplewood dump site and authorize financing the $4.20.0 cost by an appropriate transfer from the General Fund Contingency Account. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - al l 6. Ordinance for Special Assessment of Delinquent False Alarm Charges (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Finance Faust presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Carlson moved to t able_ theDroaosed ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - Mayor Bastian, Councilmembers Carlson, Koppen, Rossbach Nays - Councilmember Allenspach 13 9 -12 -94 7. Liquor Ordinance: Community Center a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to allprove first reading of an ordinance regarding liquor at the Community Center. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 8. Kohlman Lake Overlook Neighborhood Park a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks & Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Jeanne Ewald, Parks and Recreation Commission Scott Milton, 2965 Edward Street d. Councilmember Carlson moved to proceed with ap.nraisa1 of the property. Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all 9.. Charitable Gambling Fund Request a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks & Recreation Anderson presented the specifics of the report c. Councilmember Rossbach moved. to approve the request for $19.550 in Charitable Gambling funds to cover. the cost of various events rel ated_to. the opening of the Community Center.. Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all 10. Presentation Church a. Manager.McGuire presented the staff report. b. City Attorney Kelly presented the specifics of the report. 14 9 -12 -94 C. Councilmember Rossbach moved to accept the.$10.000.1ump sum pavmment in settlement of the sewer bi 11. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Allens p ach, Carlson, Koppen, Rossbach Nays None Abstain - Mayor Bastian K., VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. David Meier a. David Meier, Candidate for State Representative, District 57A, introduced himself to the Council and stated he was paying a courtesy call. 2. Gerald Moran a. Gerald Moran, Myrtle Court, stated the developer of Oak Ridge Estates is encroaching on wetlands in the area and is leaving manholes open. b. Council directed staff to investigate the allegations and to contact the DNR and Watershed District. L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Environmental Ordinance a. Councilmember Carlson stated that the Council has been discussing an environmental ordinance. b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to direct staff to prepare a list_ of properties with wetlands and describe them in such a . way as to ..allow Council to evaluate the properties with .a report back to Council in 90 days. Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all 2. Naming a. Mayor Bastian stated there have been requests for naming places, streets, etc., after citizens, and suggested a policy be set. NO ACTION WAS TAKEN 15 9 -12 -94 3 . Inspections a Mayor Bastian moved to request, staff to inspect the drainage on pond in Oak Ridge Plat and contact the Watershed District regarding the alleged violations on the site Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 4. Mayor's Forum a. Taxpayer's Right -To -Know hearing 11 -29 -94 and, if needed, 12 -9 -94. b. Community Center on track and within budget with grand opening scheduled for October 15, 1994. c. Open Space Committee be connected to Parks & Recreation Commission as an advisory group. d. Weeds around Afton Park - referred to Staff e. Schroeder Milk building completed — when will plantings take place. 1> Council directed Staff to investigate. 5. Dog Control a. 1513 E. County Road B: Advertising for wolves pups, dog scratching siding - many complaints. b. Council directed Staff to investigate. 6. Cable TV a. Commission in law suit with Cable Company M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Open Space Progress a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Assistant Manager Maglich reported on the progress of the Open Space acquisitions. 16 9 -12 -94 N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 9:42 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius 17 9 -12 -94 AGENDA NO. E"14"' AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager FROM: Assistant it Manager o City RE: CITIES WEEK DATE: September 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed--., Modifies - Rejected Date The League of Minnesota Cities is sponsoring various events for CITIES WEEK. Two of the events are a poster contest for grades K-6 and an essay contest for grades Z- '12.__ S.taffmembers from North St. Paul, Maplewood, and Oakdale worked together to coordinate I.S.D. 622 poster and essay contests. The sample material is attached. In addition to Maplewood posters and essays being returned to the City for judging, we offered the services- of the City Manager and elected officials to attend school and talk about cities. This item will be on your October 10 agenda. PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Minnesota cities are where people live, raise a family, go to work, and enjoy recreation; and WHEREAS, Minnesota cities are a grass roots government system which represents a close relationship between elected officials and citizens; and _WHEREAS, Minnesota cities are home to 85 percent of the people in Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Minnesota cities provide the basic services necessary to ensure the health, safety, and well being of the people -- services such as water, streets, and police and fire protection; and WHEREAS, Minnesota cities are essential to the protection and development of our lakes, rivers, land, and air; and WHEREAS, Minnesota city officials, city employees, and volunteers should be praised and thanked for their efforts in providing for the economic growth, safety, and vitality of our communities. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Maplewood proclaims September 25 - October ' to be Minnesota Cities Week in Minnesota and urges citizens to take this opportunity to learn more about city government and how they can become more involved. MAYOR 09-1,3-1994 U 4 : 1 0PM FROM CITY i tF i"iHKDALE Ti i 977�.��t4506 P-02 RTH ST. PAUL M PLEWZ 0 September 13, 1194 <TITLE> <F1I <COWANY> , <ADDRF S S ] > <CITY >, <STj Dear <FIRST Governor Carlsd - proclaim the last: event is to help d Week celebratioi would like to sp( T NAME> <LAS T NAME > <ZIP> too s � i f i i has been asked by the League of NI]innesota Cities to Week of September as Cities 'Week. The purpose of this tizens better understand what cities 80. As part of the Cities the cities of Maplewood, North St. Paul, and Oakdale nsor activities for all 622 students. f cafes week September 25- October 2, 1994 We would like your students, to participate in an essay; contest using the theme: Cities - "ere you come home. The grades have.. een divided into two categories: grades 7 -9 and 10 -12. These categories correspond with those established for the statewide competition. The dssays are requested to be 750 words or less. Tht., dtodl to enter is Monday, October 3, Th1P Pity- stuff' members are asking that you - have the teachers separate the ess ` s according to the students' city residence. On the afternoon of October 3, a representative from each city 11 come to your school and pickup the entries. Each entry will be judged by a panel from the participants city. Each city will submit the winning entry from each category to the League of Minnesota Cities for the statewide competition. The top two essays irl each category will be submitted to the local paper for publication. All the essays will be on display at the respective City Hall through October 14, 1994. E In addition, the t4ayors, City Councilmembers, and City Managers from all three cities would like to extend the offer to you that they are available to visit with your students and discuss what a city does. A copy of the es ay contest rules is enclosed. Packets] of the contest rules will be delivered to your office by September 21 f o your teachers to distribute to the students. If you have any questions or would like to schedule vi * it with the Mayor Council or City Mans er /Administrator from Ma iew44d, North St. Paul, or Oakdale, please contact t e appropriate City Hall. Sincerely, The City staff at Maplewood, North St. Paul, and Oakdale ower- W4vltelf Steve ,tae. 52o.a �o jatad Where you come home MOP e F, ST. PAUL MAPLEWO Essay Contest The Cities of 1V! a lewood, North St. Paul, and Oakdale 41 0 are sponsorin alfDistrict 622 students to enter a statewide essa in con - ction with cities week activities throu the Lea of Minnesota Cities, 0 n The Contest is for students in g rades 7 to 12, with two 0 cate g rades 7- 9 and g rades 10-12 Essa should be 750 words or less on the theme: Cities AM Where y ou come home. • Each entr should have the name, address, and phone number of the entrant written on the cover pa for the essa • Each entr should be returned to the class room b the close 8 of school on the deadline date • Entries became the propert of the cit and will not be returned Where you come home Cities Week September 25-October 2. 1,994 # A Deadline for'?,ntries is October 3, 1 994 n Apanel of ju g es from the entrant's ci �he will determine a winner in eact of the two cate Cit will then forward the winnin entries the Lea of Minnesota Cities for the � ►tatewide contest. Each ci ty will submit entrie to the Lea b October 15, 1994. The top two '' essa in each cate will be submitted to the local paper for publication. AGENDA NO. F-1 AGENDA REPORT Action b Councilo9i TO: Cit Manager Endorsed Modified FROM: Finance Director Red e et e d Date RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: September 16, 1994 It is recommended that the Council approve e pa of the followin claims: I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 556,098.01 Checks # 3064 thru # 3116 Dated 9-01-94 thru 9-14-94 925t850-59 Checks # 14869 thru # 14988 Dated 9-26-94 $1,481,948-60 Total Accounts Pa PAYROLL: $ 236,598.59 Pa Checks # 42440 thru # 42614 Dated 9-09-94 $ 48,630.96 Pa Deduction check # 42619 thru # 42637 Dated 9-09-94 $ 285,229.55 Total Pa $1,767t 178.15 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listin of these claims. lz Attachments FINANCEAPPRUMAGN A I L i "' 0 1: VOUCHREG C 1 -f Y 0 F M FIL -14 Ll 1 /6 -Rt - IST 4em FOR PERIOD 09 I "I" E 14 1 TF-M 14 CHECK VE14DOR CHECK V E 14 L) Cl R I I A Ml`j U 1-4 T 5 NUMBER NUMBER OA TL NAME DESCRI.PTION 6 - ---- -- - -- ---- - ---- --- 30 4 --"*"----,- 42 018 , 6 - 0,9/01/=r , - K L A US I N 6 E 14R Y TERMINATIO-N CK RESIGNED 1 . 9d', 10 S PAYABLE 909.75 11 23066 5414CIO 09/01/94 M1NN. STATE TRLASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEE 3067 IZ032FJ 09/01/94 CELLULAR ONE MONTHLY CELLULAR PHO C t. 77 . 63 NE CAR M014THLY CELLULAR PHONE CHARGES t oo . 4 lyl 173 N T H L,Y--- C aLLUL-A-R—F-H alN E -(,�HA-Raa�zt �17 3068 150105 0 9/01 /94 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. REPAIR 8. MAINf/UFILIYY 15 5 4 33 rf REPAIR MA I lq"f /U 11 L I . T Y 11 0 9 - 3069 15017155 09/01/94 COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONST. ELECT WORK HOIST INSTALLA'VION 453.44 �.,UI 1 221 3070 762294 09/01/94 ROYAL CREST/ERVING CARLSON REFUND GRADING E SC R 0 W R C. 7 "1 1 o0c). 00 REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 'IT13 18.7 T 1 24 ------------ -7.04 Y 3071 z 05 0 0 09/0 2/ 94 GROUP HEALTH INC . M 0 N f'H L PREM I M SEPT 94 4 0 2�6 MONTHLY PREMIUM SEPT, 94 15 P A 61' 1 --- C. H;--* C K AMOUNT 151 . 9 6 11! 90':r. 75 463.44 1 IF 17 18 19 4 9 20 307Z 530 100 09/02/94 MEDICA CHOICE MONfHLY PREMIUM SEPF 94 4,919.50 SEP- 1 94 16 t", 1 0 Q MONTHLY PREMIUM SEPT 94 986 .50 132 133 3073 180100 6?-l-QQZ/ 4 Do, .... Q-, A j.�l 0 0 0 330-00 134 jss 3074 551100 09/OZ/94 MN MU RANCE TUAL LIFE INSU Mi-11NITHLY PREMIUM SEF f 94 -18 10 . -11 MONTHLY PREMIUM 'SEPT 94 4 9 2" 1 MONTHLY PREMIUM SEPT 94 1�069.44 MONTHLY PREMIUM SEPI' 94 1 4 3075 501400 09/02/94 MADISON NATIONAL LIFE MONTHLY PREMIUM SEPT 94 41 42 3076 350930 09'0-7/94 HQLMAN, J T �( REJ-UND - SOCCER 81 .00 81,00 307 7 T 4 31150 09/OZ/94 READER EXCHANGE SERVICES CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Z Z 4t, 46 2;0 630910 09/02/94 NAI*IONWlDt' ADVERTISING SERV. - ------ -- ------- EMPLOYMEN-f ADS FOR COMM CTR 304.48 304.48 4 1 481 .3079 12 Q -3 5 09/02/94 C-LLULAR JN- t= -! N E 5 43 9 U, 4 2 9 491 3080 190400 09/OZ/94 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR 3 1 c► 0 319.00 : 0 3081 F541 40 '09 10 f 9 4 MINN. SYATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIB: FEES PAYABLE 734.50 734.50 b4 '-losz 541400 09/02/94 MINN. ST'I'E TREASURER MOTOR VEH LlC [ -LL FAYAL-'-'LE 97. 7 3 " )113.3 480500 09/02-//94 LOFQREN JOHN R. FINAL PAY CHECK 9-.9-94 PIR 10:3 4 6: 78.46 P A 61' 1 --- C. H;--* C K AMOUNT 151 . 9 6 11! 90':r. 75 463.44 1 IF 17 18 19 4 9 20 I %v VOUCHREG MOTOR VEH LIC FEES C 11 11 _Y OF MAPLE WOOD 46 16 09/16/94 0(:42 L) 3088 541400 c 5 09/0 '/94 MINN. STAJEJREASURER VOUQHtR/QFlEQi---* R- GIST'R F q PA L t: 114 z5f $ 5 FOR PERIOD 09 190400 U-C H E R I 23 3091 17 89ozoo 09 / T /51 U S WEST' CELLULAR INC TELEPHONE 280-5F571 CHECK VE14DOR C H E C K VENDCJR ITEM I ..,. M -R NUMBER N U M BE DATE NAME SCR'L ON DEP*rI A M f--' li N T 7 5:08 480600 1 09/02/94 LOFGREN JOH14 R. SERVERANCE t PAY -TERM INAYED 9/01 71.40 9 55 05 Q Q ___ 1 __*3 Q- 7 __j) 9 Olt 9 SALLY. f 6 5 JU-1-5.' R I DQR5 K�i 6A .M____ _S .UP.FLl 1� 5 % 1 10 1,� 3086 231680 09/06/94 EILERTSC-114 DORlS REFUND - VALLEYFAIR 6C &. 00 .66 .00 131 3087 641400 09/06/94 MINN, STATE TREASURER 14 MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 46 46_1�234.54 L) 3088 541400 c 5 09/0 '/94 MINN. STAJEJREASURER __aT A T E DRIVERS LIC F q PA L t: 114 z5f $ 5 i6 190400 09/09/94 23 3091 17 89ozoo 09 / T /51 U S WEST' CELLULAR INC TELEPHONE 280-5F571 LANCE 35.07 MOTOR 118 TELEPHONE 280-51-172 MIKE K. 35.07 . Z 1092 541400 TELEEPHONE ZIE310-51573 ED . N 3 4 5 104.79 :/f 3090 SO q 16 5 0 09/07*/Q,4 ftEj'R IQ --.W S _( E 0 IC 1. M �L alq S J WL 0 t;._ _. SERVICE SEPT 94 -1 -6 0 0 Js sG .3097 190400 09/09/94 23 3091 541400 09/OT/94 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE DEPT. . Z 1092 541400 09/07/94 MINN. ------ ----- - STA'fE TREASURER STA7`1 E DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYAh-LE 731.00 7 -3093 101900 09/08/94 BY DESIGN PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHING 541400 09/09/94 125.00 ST-ATE" TREASURER _P10TOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 1941651.01 3094 541400 09/08/94 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOYOR VEH LIC FEES PAYAL'.'LE ZZ 3095 541400 09/08/94 MINN. SYATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS ------- - --- LIC FEES PAYABLE 611.Z5 09/09/94 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE 8-26-94 P/R DEDUCf'10N lZ :33 3096 4 6. 0 5 4 .5 09/09/94 LEAGUE OF MINNE"SOTA CITIES I-RAINJ N G 980700 1 zo.00 341 Js sG .3097 190400 09/09/94 DEPT. OF NAFURAL RESOURSES DNR 13T.00 137.00 3i w .,098 190400 09/09/94 DEPT. OF NATURAL RLSOURSES DNR TITLES 10.00 10.00 :3s1 I 3099 541400 09/09/94 MINN. ST-ATE" TREASURER _P10TOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 1941651.01 3100 541400 09/09/94 MINN. STAfE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYAB'LE 483. 75 4 E,2:.75 3101 7Z2200 09/09/94 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE 8-26-94 P/R DEDUCf'10N lZ 8-26-94 P/R DEDUCTION I to 9 7 7 1 . ::t4 28 46 3102 980700 09/12/94 LINDA ZICK PROGRAM SUPPLIES 14.00 SUPPLIES - JAN11"ORIAL 48 491 SMALL TOOLS 8.99 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 6.24 TRAVEL & TRAINING 2.50 BOOKS 1.50 SUPPLIES EQUIPME141' 16. 1 61 TRAVEL E L TRAIN lklG 51.00 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 34.30 FEES FOR SERVICE 3.0.0 TRAVEL TRAINING 3.50 -- - ----- ---- -- -__ CHEC AMOUNT 71.40 ZI 1 7'14. 10 731.00 125.00 ZZ 11 . 2_* 5 57] UTILITIES 2133 7 UTILITIES '741 9 58 .62 H "r T T •T T 1:: Q -7' 9 Ci A 4:} ri VOUCHREG 10.71 I:s;,� CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 11.19 PAGE 3 Y81 UTILITIES 63 3 11 2_:' 541400 UTILITIES Z03 16.80 MOTOR VEH LIB: UTILITIES 1685 30.84 i X1 UTILITIES 2001 6 6 8 FOR PERIOD 09 MINN. STATE TRtASURER S7ATE DRIVERS L1 C: FEES PAYABLE 734.75 • 12 3 3114 7 2, '1 Z 0 0 4 W 5 PRO SOURCE FITNESS CYBEX CHECK VENDOR C HiE C: K VENDOR ITEM I T E M CHECK 6 '! N U lyl B E R N U M Y--,'E R DATE N A M rE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMO UNT 7 CYBEX CIRCUIT EQUI PMENT Z�869.05 • 8 541400 ----------- 09/14/94 Ml]qNw STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYAE.'LE PROGRAM SUPPLIES 19.14 9 '� FEES FOR SERVICE 11.29 10 140.97 11 12 23. 10 3 7201*68 09 1 9 4 PREMIER BANK P/R DEDUC FION 9-9-94 P/R 10,805.9T 13 14 F' /E' DEDUCTION ?-9-94 P/R 27 15 _P- 1 R - ------ D E D.. U C.-f- - . I 0-N 55 9 7 49al 16 86 1(.-)4 541400 09/12/94 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOYOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 30,147.46 30,147.46 20 3105 3 541400 0 5:1/ 12 9 4 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC F S PAYABLE. E_ EE E 829. 15 82 9.75 121, 22 23 ;40.0 ---- ------ - 0.9.4 12._/_.94A_S'SQ C_I.A"_T'E.D__ B. UR_E.A.U_S_ -------- - -- -- F'_F�1_�nAF�1? LEA "'i'E _F' :E�ChAM- I;�_I_L_L_I_t�l�,�__ -0) .-Z. 5 9s7-1 24 25 :1107 021100 09/12/94 AMERICAN ESTATE REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC 7'83 2 1 26 27 _0 J� 28 29 3108 090532 09/12/94 BRADT, JEFFREY REFUND GRADING ESCROW REC TT94 1 30 31 REFUND GRADING ESCRAW RE Y' _31 6 i.00*�.9 32 9 33 3 10 9 541200 09 /12/9 4 M I NN . STATE RETIREMENT C WE R MAGER 9 - 9 --94 P/R D-COP IP 63 34 9.63 35 36 '3 110 341706 09/13/94 HERITAGE BANK US SAVINGS r' L-*,'O N D S 8 / Z 9 P R 1 19050.00 37 38 3111 661750 09/13/94 NORf*HERN s'rATES POWER U T I L I T I E 3,14 39 40 UTILITIES 220 3.14 41 UTILITIES T71 3.14 42 43 UT I L I T I ES 1 15 4 0 44 UTILITIES f 4 1 3.14 45 UTILITIES 2501 4.72 46 47 UTILITIES 2"(39 3.14 48 57] UTILITIES 2133 7 UTILITIES '741 9 58 .62 H "r T T •T T 1:: Q -7' 9 Ci A 4:} ri UTILITIES 14157 10.71 I:s;,� UTILITIES 2290 11.19 UTILITIES 63 3 11 2_:' 541400 UTILITIES Z03 16.80 MOTOR VEH LIB: UTILITIES 1685 30.84 i X1 UTILITIES 2001 6 6 8 57] UTILITIES 2133 7 UTILITIES '741 9 58 .62 H "r T T •T T 1:: Q -7' 9 Ci A 4:} ri 1 T 5 678 3a... T34.75 66 67 19,680.52 49 so K 1 5 1 64.7 2 174. -ATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE :3, 116 541400 09/14/94 MINN. STATE TREASURER S) 6.6 8 .50 6,68 3 11 2_:' 541400 09/13/94 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIB: FEES PAYABLE 17 i X1 31 11 .2.1 541400 09/13/94 MINN. STATE TRtASURER S7ATE DRIVERS L1 C: FEES PAYABLE 734.75 • 3114 7 2, '1 Z 0 0 09/13/94 PRO SOURCE FITNESS CYBEX CIRCUI'r EQUIPMENT 1+.i, ' •YBEEX CIRCUIT EQ U I P ME Iq 4'_1 Q . 2 0 0 CYBEX CIRCUIT EQUI PMENT Z�869.05 • 3115 541400 ----------- 09/14/94 Ml]qNw STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYAE.'LE 16 Zb 1 T 5 678 3a... T34.75 66 67 19,680.52 49 so K 1 5 1 64.7 2 174. -ATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE :3, 116 541400 09/14/94 MINN. STATE TREASURER S) 6.6 8 .50 6,68 I L V CITY OF M PAGE 4 r 1''• r~• ! w r 2 It FOR PERI 09 1 2 1 3 2 , 3 V - - -. _ _... _.. - -- - - -- ----- _ _ - -- __ __ - -- - -- - - - - -- _ _ ----- } CHE CK VENDOR CHECK' VEND ITEM ITEM - r CHECK AMOUNT 6 1 5 NUMBE NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUN 7 8 7 8 14869 010474 0 9 6/ AAA O F F ICE PR D UPLICATIN G COSTS 70.15 70.15 s 10 , 11 9 $70 J 4' — 0 _ 1 5 105 T' 09 - _ -- 4:L4 12 13 �11 10 14871 0 � t�i Ct 2 5 c � ':� / �: t1 / :a �• A D +_� L F S Ct !�! �� PETERSON, I !V t' . PROGRESS PMT T H Fi U AUG :�' �• C- �(i:• _l i 58 16 13 14 1 OZ . 0 40 - 0 0 9 AI IN w P R 21 r 0 4� 21 17 18 19 15 _ 14873 0 L 0 8 $ 0 09/26194 A T E C- PAIti -_ &- __ � N— f__ � _� �..C•I-E _ __ __ 9 _�— 1 r � � 4 99-54 20 __.RE. 21 i6 17 14, 74 021050 t: 9/ 26 / 94 AME AUT T R IM .: REPAID: ' NAINF /VEHICLE c- •. 1 ) 1 54 w L0 22 22 i 19i 14875 02l 2 0 9/26/94 AMERICAN IHk IGAT'10N � TUR SUP _ VALVE BOX FOR MA III 31 4 1 �+ 26 2 u FLAG F M 1!! t" r' . 1, 22 14876 0 ? 1 Z5 0 �.9 A LIN S UP`P`LY FiU C:LEAN ti �.�UF'F'LI 34 3 � , , , i } %' 29 30 4. 31 2.4 i' 7 t� �" tit r ,y >< "j �, �'� � 1 L DA f —_ . _. _.. -.._. _.._ - -- - ... __..._ t r y �-' . �J L �. 1 _. .O i_H [1__. - y _. _ r_._ , 4 .�j_ . �- •_F_. � _ _ � _ 2 _:_. _� .__ E _ OTHER H E H 1 Ct �:1 r �� 5 o z5 � -+ 33 26 34 35 27 1 41094178 0304 0 9 / i 6/ 94 }`� E R S ! !�_s E �- �` w l I _.����.�_.� � fi��r H.- - -- - -- ___ f� 6� :• �: ;: 5 36 — _ 37 28 29 1 0 3 0 42 0 09 / 2 161/ 94 AND EVER A BUILDIN I AUG 4 1 1 38 � 39 40 31 14 0 09 / 2 6/ 9 4 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES, 'INC. ANIMAL CONTROL 3 31556.69 41 42 - v 43 33 I �• . 1 031 1 00 09/2 4 A F F' E. A R A N C E F' L U � _ __..____ __- CAR AFi NA�HE _ - _- _- ._ -- - . -_ - - -_ _ .__ ._. _ __ -_ ------- - - -___ _�_ - - _---- _____ 56.00 44 34 _ —, CAF{ WASH 7.00 45 CA WASHES / ■ 00 70.00 47 � T zw, 37 1488; 031500 09/','6/94 AQUA ENGINEERING � IRRIGATION SYS1E:fly! HA:ZELW:.��OD F'K I t�i� :�0C . _ . 49 5 0 3;1 r r i DRINKING FCUN� "AIN HAZELNt D FK 1 Cr : :~, p t�� U , 2 a' � 8 .0 G , 1 51 39 `�2 X40 148;, 04 09 A AUT S E R VICE r r .1 R E P AI R MAINT /VEHIC-•L I T. T 6 w _;..� t -. 53 1 41 REPAIR & MAINT /VEHICLE 147.89 11924.19 9 55 � 5'.i 42 56 43 14884 0 09 AU SE RVICE S R E P AIR ih MA INT /V 1 06 w 3 9 57 44 5ti ' 59 45 148 05092 5 ----- 0 9/26/94 —__ ---- ---- -- ---- ____.._._... AZURE F'�,t�F'ERT -IIE _ ___ - -- - - - - -- - -- ._........._ _ - - - -- - - - - -, ---._ ____ -_. _ __ - - -- -- - - -- _ r _ .._.'�_� lei t:. k ...L-�. .l...L l N � .._ _ .___ ._ ---- - - - - -- - -- -- -- - -_- _ - ----- __..._- � � � . �# � -- � � r � � _. 60 61 _._____— ____-- _-- __-___ _- - - ---- 1 47 j 4 8 8 it 'L 0X119tx x 0`;+ /Z i, - /94 BAUER BUILT SUPPLIES - VEHICLE �~� `:�4 ! ?r A 6 3 t L3 4b SU - Vii. E H I C L k _ .__. _... _. _.. _. _..._ .__..._ - -- - r�, � .35 - -._ .__. _ .__ __ _-.- �. _ _- - _ � ._ _ � 64 _ 41� - __ _ �- __ __ _� . -__ — _._._.____._ -_ -� ..______. - .__...___._.- ---- _...__.__.......__._ _._._r..._ -_-- __- .____.__._._- ___,...._____ __.,._._..___ ._.. _.. _ ._ SUPP - E QUIPME N T 9 4 8 1 w X49 . 77 65 66 50 6 51 1 0 7 1 M O O 0 9 / Z 6/ 94 r D E S T BUY... CO. ! - ------ - - - -.. - - -- -- - -- - -- - _ .... — — OF I C: _ SU _ _.. _ _. _ . _. _ . -- - -- - ---- .__ - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - -_ - -- Fi , 1 :; F� �. , � :w — - 68 69 -- - - -- -- - _ ___- - - _ ' r�3 ( 1 4 8 8 8 1 :35 0 tJ9 / i� 4 BUI LD E R S S Q U A R E : .ES — EUIPM;i+i i SUi—PLI �� ��'J 55 3 5 7_''._ 70 t S U F` F' L 1 E S _ E Q U I h' M E !V 1 ... _._. _ _ - .. _ ? wr -- - _.._... , -- _ .. -- - -._, . - - -- - J5 5f 1 11 0390 09 / ,: 6/` 4 CAP OL R UBBER S T A M P COMP SU - O FFICE 5 6 . � �� i 75 F: - O F F I Q c► 1 "7 - _ .. _. - -- - _. - - -. _.. _ _ `=� ? - -`' - - -- -- ''; 14903 230250 09/26/94 E. N. R. 3YR SUBSCRiprioN 148.00 148 .00 54 r r 14904 230900 V 0 U C H R E G EASTMAN KODAK COMPA14Y DUPLICA COSTS CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 61 129.71 PAGE Y8] DUPLICATING COSTS 0'--' 16/9 07:42 -- ._...__.- _. .__._...- -... - - -- -- VOUC:HER/C:HECK REGISTER S-1 = 69 70 1-31 f 3 211 1 71 185.31 72 DUPLICArING cosrs 7 74 FOR PERIOD 09 75 DUPLIC.':A7ING : 3 4 DUPLICATING CHECK R VENDOR CHEC VE14DCIR II EM DUPLICArING M ITEM CHECK 5 250200 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 250300 A M 0 U INIT 6 AMOUNT 7 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 14907 300500 09/26/94 G & K SERVICES UNIrl""ORMS & CLOTHING 8 14890 1108150 09/26/94 CATCO SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 8. • 9 �'� SUPPLiES - VEHICLE 12 10 2 11 1489 120 100 09/26/94 CEDAR COMPUTERS CENTER, INC. COMPUTER EQUIPMENY ---- 1 06 -- .12 17 -748•06 13 14 15 14892 120325 09/26/94 CELLULAR ONE CELLULAR PHON'z - -- .,U3E 11z.0 112.07 16 17 1 489 3 120400 09/26/94 •EMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 12 1a MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 4 1 *44.8Z 20 21 • 14894 1 205 15 09/26/94 CENTRAL STORES SUPPLIES - OFFICE 1-12.30 52. 30 22 23 24 14895 161350 09/26/94 COMPUCARD INC. SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 776 POSTAGE 18.50 9 6 26 , 40 27 28 14896 151400 09/Z6/94 COMPUTER SHOPPER 1YR SUBSCRIPTION 21.9T 21-1* 1 9 T 29 30 1489*7 152400 09/26/94 COPY SUPPLIES Lf' M,ENT 14().Z7 31 140.27 32 33 • �'`� 1 4 8'? 8 180110 09/26/94 D.C.A. DENTAL CLAIMS 231,20 34 . 11 3 1 20 35 36 1 4899 180900 09/26/ 94 DAL EY, FA I PLUMBING INSPECT IONS AUG 94 4 116 4 0 37 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS AUG 94 5 5 145 .50 38 39 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS AUG 94 1--) 145 .50- 40 PLUMBING INSPECTIONS AUG 94 6ZIA 0 0 4 41 0 42 43 14900 181800 09/26/94 DAVIES WATER E -WIPMENT MAINTENANCE MATE.RTAL Ai tj 0 T J. 0 41 t it 44 45 0 14901 1818! 09/26/94 DAVIS LOCK & SAFE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 19.11 6 19.11 47 48 14902 210325 09/26/94 DOODY ME•HANICAL INC. PROGRESS PMT COM CTR THRU AUG 101,208.25 49 PROGRESS Pmr coo CTR THRU AUG 553Z6.75 50 PROGRESS PMT COM QTR THRU AUG 5 7b- 51 loll2108.25 52 53 14903 230250 09/26/94 E. N. R. 3YR SUBSCRiprioN 148.00 148 .00 54 r r 14904 230900 09/26/94 EASTMAN KODAK COMPA14Y DUPLICA COSTS 0 3 0 61 129.71 62 63� DUPLICATING COSTS "54 .29 65 116. 19 .,...,-.-....-D.UPLTCA.T .111GI-C.QS7 S-1 = 69 70 1-31 f 3 211 1 71 185.31 72 DUPLICArING cosrs 7 74 75 DUPLIC.':A7ING COSTS DUPLICATING COSTS DUPLICArING COSTS 14905 250200 09/26/94 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 14906 250300 09/1:16/94 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CEO. INC:. MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 14907 300500 09/26/94 G & K SERVICES UNIrl""ORMS & CLOTHING UNIFORMS 8: CLO'rHl-.N-G,. 97.67 51 58 59 1 00 . 7 1 60 0 3 0 61 129.71 62 63� 64 "54 .29 65 116. 19 66 1 67 .68 88tl Ob 69 70 1-31 f 3 211 1 71 185.31 72 73 21 44 6 74 75 8 4.' 4 1761 a 1 V OUCHREC CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE, 6 1 � - r r •� r• • �''' - -- - .�_..._- _._._.,.. ___.._- --- ...._..._.. _ _.._. __._ . _ - __.fir_ � �f�: t�lL . f. HE_ :E.. 1 FOR PERIOD 09 1 3 3 i 1UL _H E R I _ __ - -- - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- _ _ -- - -_ _ _ ._�. _ - - -- .... - - - -- -_ - - - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- - _ 4 4 CHECK VEiuDOR CHECK VEICIDr_+R ITEM ITE.11 CHECK 6 e t , 6 5 NUMBER NUMB DATE NAME DE AMCIUNT AMOUNT 7 s e UirilF+: +hMS Iti CLOTHING s UNIFO & CLOTHING 31 .04 10 13 11 14908 30',%600 09 1ki -t/94 GLAD S TRANSMISSION CENTER REPAIR MAINT /VEHI.CLE 376 -1 375. 00 14 4 T2 _ is 13 14909 3fit:' X00 09/26/94 Cal...ENWOOD INGLEW+COU BOTTLED WATER FOR CITY HALL 76.00 76.00 � 17 1t 16 9 •� �• t- ; 1 J • 15 _ 0 ; - use 0 -_ 0 _ v R U B E R. ' -S --? (� E I i ��.� ___ _- - - -._^ _. -.. _1 _r_: t r �C.E -- :�5 LL- _--- -- - - -- _ _ 6 z _ 09 C)9 20 16 21 t 14911 330950 C19/264/94 HEAVY DUTY EQUIPME14T SALES INC ROLLING JACK Z 2 .00 2 � �0 14 � 19 1 49 1 Z 340110 0 9 / Z 6 / 9 4 H E. a nl Y R I N C BOBC R E N >+ A L �..._Z r9_1 . ,4 _T 29 ._...__,._.�. 25 I2 26 0 121 14 9 1 3 341 :1 / Zk/ 't HE S U U1_! I N G I - .R ►� _.�NT_;�.ls��tl�l.f �_--- - - - - -- - � �1 c a � � _, � . ;•� 23 - -- - ' 22 29 23 14914 510 TOO 09/26/94 HIRSHFIELDS MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 24 _ 32 25 14915 3 51 2 5 D 0 9 / 2 (6 / 9 4 T H O Fi A N , PATRICK H. R 1 HOUR _ BOBCAT 40 .1 0_0�___._- - -- ----40 .00 x - 33 26 34 35 27 14 916 3 70080 09/Z6 � -1 N ! F jRj_C. -_ 1 , � 84.0 0 ss 26 P ROGRESS PMT COMM CTR T HRU AU 2 y � 04 .I: + 37 2 y P ROGRESS PMT COMM CTR THtiU AUG : 41 884.00 39 30 31 14 400 0 9 / Z6 / J EA W E TH OR N E. TEM SE T S ERVIC ES I MA NAGER S O 9w_.94 41 :32 TEMP SERVICES FOR RECEPTIONIST 98.00 190,94 42 =13 14 14918 430300 09/26/94 EsNOIiiLAN' S _. P ROGRAM SUPPL 45 � SUP`P'LIES 'JANITORIAL 14.` 4 47 3b I , 8 - _----- _. _ _ _ - _ __r SUPPLIES F' L � � � J �� t�l I r � ; F� � AL � . _ ,� : ►� 3 PROGRAM SUPPLIES' 15..40 49 ( SUPPLIES ANITORIAL 27.58 � � F' 52 I`}U PROGRAM S U P F` L i E S 1.31 _.-.. :,� �_ �.� ,: � .)3 .r . �_t I 1 � 54 r 55 t : � r~ t ;• M t •t 56 4: 4•i+ 1.:.0 t r. 15 L . IYI . 1 . - I . 143 57 144 14 O 4 .5 09 / 6/ 94 LA I r ► S ON S RE D PL 's S PE C S P �• ;-t9 q 20 .00 2 0.00 38 C.. �.. r.i � I� � L 1.« � :. . tJ 4. �• a� [' f t� r 1 � J9 ` 60 46 14921 460451 09/26/94 LEAGUE OF MINN. C I'1" iE ; MEMBLRSHI P DUES 9/l/94-8/31/95 1 r, 068.00 12 61 47 62 63 48 149 4 1,;,0 5 41 09 L O F MINNESOTA CITIES JUDGEMENT LOSSES INS. CLAIM 1 QT4.5 1 E► 36 14923 47� 700 09/26 LILLIE SUE NEWSPAPERS ADS FOR CO CTR 419. _0 67 � - - - - -- -- ------ - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -- - - -- - -- - -. _ JULY PUBLISHING 8 - - -- -- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -- - -- _ _ -- - i�? - - -- ___ HEA IU i + I I C E. FOR =.r 4 •- tj rat 42.95 - - - - -- ---- - - - i69 J.. 53 PU 33. i t 11 154 LEGAL F ISC�AL �o-:3 . �' =1 72 `' LEGAL FI 1 4 ` 8 ! 8 M 73� J 149 4 7 0810 � / 2 ,! . 4. � _ 1 �! Ll E F1; S G t� Fi U �, lu �• �. I'� L h. A I !V `I k i�l +� IU ( ` t: � "! E R 1 A L � C► _ 16 I . ; V rr UCHhEU CITY ►i�` MA1='LE�I PAGE t } 9 / 16! 94 07; 4 _ .. 8 1 2 FOR PERIOD 09 VOUCH _ 3 ' ± CHECK VENDOR CHECK VE1 ITEM ITEM 4 CHECK 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION AM0U1 l�M►�U�rIT 6 ----- - - - - -- -- 14925 5,00800 09 /26/94 M.T.I. DISTRIBUTING CO. SHIPPING CHARGES 1� ■64 14 s ■64 10 ' ' 1 4 5 - 1 2 6 ... ..r 5» 1 1 1 { ="f JJ .� • // � M... !' _l _ .5.. ..r r. _� yp �" gyp � `•• s }•�. }�.•+. .M 7 '• 1.. 5w r ..f)) 1 f ( � f }� rS' 1 S � � 1. � P � C E ! 5.,. i N y.� !�Y M �, � � M r' •• .r 11 •r !''i 1 149 27 52r: 070 09/26/94 MCC:ARTHY WELL COMPANY REPAIR WELL 411 .57 t4 X11 a �7 15 ', 14928 5�: {� {:�' /:: ��_!' MC +HU CON CO., I NC. F'R'►:t{� F'M T t;:t'rMM C ! R Cr;rPd 14 5 6 4 T . 0 6 17 PROGRESS PMT COMM CTR C:C1NS T 964 .87 18 1 61 1.93 19 14 9 ":19 + »+ . , t } � � {} 0 09 / • / 9 4 MENARDS MAINTENANCE i+'I A T E R I A L 4 ` .. 4 9.59 21 ......- .- ......._ -.. 22 I , 14930 540070 09/26/94 MID - AMERICA BUSINESS SYSI'EMS SUf- 'PLIES EQ UIPMENT __ 51 3 -m- 1 2 23 5k 24 14931 540177 09 /26/94 MIDWE R ADIA TO R SU PPLI E S V EHI C LE 93 6 93606 f1 I�_.. 27 14 '��' _.__.._ 5ri1 I' - 00 _._�.._. �_ 09!26!94 .......... __. _ _ . MN RE:C. ��� PARK PARK ASS��C CATION PROGRAM PROGRAM E"UPF'L1 SUPPLIES __. - 2s ••� ( a:: 0 0 29 f _ PROGRAM SUPPLIES a 30 144 .00 i. f 14'x•11 57t�t:�!�. 0 09/2 MOBILE EMER SY INC. - - -- F� �4...MAINT /VEHICLE 14.5.00 33 , , , R EP AI R t. MAINTlV HI C:LE. 65 0.00 34 3 . „;. - i ..... ..._...____- R IR Efi'A • ;: M A IN!"lVEHI CL.E _... _. _ ._ 36 REPAIR & MA1NT /VE.HIC:LE. 1E,'�.i }Cr 37 f , REPAIR & MAIN'r /VEHICLE 108.00 3 � 3� -- - -- -- - - -- - -- - _ __ _ -- - - - - - REPAI F' A :� R ,• - -- __.. _ _ - 40 REPAIR & MA INT /VEHI CLE r: x 00 �. 41 143 x 00 14 3 4 - 7C.r 0 / '=w' 6 94 MO_ "� R .0 S_- ..._..._._._. _ _.._._... ._ _ MAI N AN MAT __.... _ t�l _ ___. .._ _ _.- Y - �.7 ��.`� _ _....._�_ 2 � 42 43 44 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL ,�7 a ' =,::� . - - 45 MAIhlT MA ER'IAL 108.51 { M N �! l.�_E _MATERIAL ------- -- ._�__— 10 47 48 I' 1 MAINTENANCE MATERIAL �.� ■�� .•:.l.:r�. {��� 0 ?, I! S„ Fl .__-1 �1 ...._ t } �7 _ -• 7..._x•._•_1___.- ..__.__.. }'`.� •� W '__f 2_ _!'• .4...._...M+C t ♦ t .� .. C"! �t E.N�_..I1 ° C•ART.u.C•0NC•R E TE. _.._..- _. - . -.... _. .. _ , _.. MAIN T E NANC E }`E NANC•E.._ MA T E.RTA!.. �,' �,�� ■ � * � � 7 . 52 I 41 14936 5 t f - s00 09/ MO INC R it: MAI / RADIO '-9T 53 54 9T 55 I 1 ~DENNIS --- - - ^ - -- � -. - -- .�. 56 r } � 09/26/94 M L1 L V A N E Y ) D i r U NIFORM S I F` k M ,� ,.. S , C L OTHIN G �• ZO a 00 s 20 ■ 00 5 8 r G -. 61 {;��•00 ray /�.+._/ 94 _ ._._._... MUICILITE CO. _ .N.. _ . _ _ .... _. UF'F'LI� _ ._ VEHICLE _ 4- ......_ . _. _. _.. _. _ __ ._._ _ _.__ ...... __..___- 11 �' __ �__.- __ . Vi 4 SUPPLIES - VEHICLE 48 a b6 _ 159.10 61 62 :._ : 630038 38 0x. 2rt : 4 N ■!':■ _ ■It�!�.•x ...._--------...---------------------'-- --- .__._._---_..----- ---- `t: INi' /R.ADIr -.._.. _..._.. - — ----- - -- -- -- -- ._ __..... _..-- ---- --- - 9.; 37 0 1`0 t, 149 40 64 5 09/ NEL J VEHICLE. ALL 26 5 67 14941 �� 6 4 0 1"...r O'0'.-)/26/94 NEWSWi�EK I;i01.�f' *S 1�;,51T 18.57 6s 70 .,1 1 4 9 4 2 , •_+ +.} {�} 0 . r ,.: �__ ! : N O B LE , . ROBERT N r,.' f�' a r ` i -. ; =; / �-� I EC:TT�� 110 71 f 73 14943 660'2 0 0 NORTH STAR rURF, I NC ■ GRASS SEED A I"HLE CIC FIELD 851 x 4 7 74 75 _ i�l i r R T H .. ;T AR T U R' F•' , I N t: .. .. - _..__ ........ _..._. .... _..._ _. 1 - 6 VOUC:HREG CITY OF MAPLEWOOU PAGE 8 , 1 I �> 09 16 / 4 07:42 i_ _ f•4 kE � V i U {.: H E / C: F1 � t' }:. G I S' TER F1 P ERI O D 09 -- 1 l 2 3 3 V HE R f 4 4 CHECK V E N I3 Ci k CHECK VENDOR -- _... _.._..__ __...___. _ I T E lYl I "1 EM t: H r C: }:ti 5 5 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESC AMOUNT AM 6 4 7 1944 +�•� 1E�1 �:''+ / /''� NCiFi "t . y. ��LIE ,._ �_._�... _ - 9 . f' NORTHERN AIRGA ; U EQUIF`ME,14�a _ _ 176.18 �B SUPPLIES M EQU IPMEN C OX YGEN 28.80 Z04. 1 4 Ig i 1J 14'= 45 t 130 0 9/2 6 /94 N RT HERN BATTERY EQUIPMENT � i =- 8 j r a � + � , > > NORTHERN + E i U T 1~' !+'! k. hi i" C 7 H E h ___ -_ -_ -- - - - - -- —� f y � �•r -1 .00 1 � =r E� � Y C� 13 C� ( 11I � � 14 12 1 4F� �� I_,145 c:� � 1-9- Ni Q- .r.H ,__- - _�{ -_ �� _���_..__.�_._. _ _' '.11.F`�'�.���__ - ��i�._.._��- `��_�_ -_ _ - �� ��_,_ 13 - ______��..__._�._._.__ -. -._� ___ �.. �_- .�..�.._.. _____..__ ___ __ ,____ ___.�__ . _ _._._ _ ' Iti1 t R M `" � A L Y ,., r I F t i x ` �' c "' �...� 16 � 14947 661 760 0 NO STATES POWER CO. UNDE:E`GHOUND ING ELECTRICAL LI14E 4 N" 46 19 � 7 U 14948 6 09 /26 /94 6 /94 NYGTR PUBLISHING COMPANY INC PUBLISHING MAPL.L-WOaD IN mo 1"ION �, �c:�i�,c;�ti �, T05.00 21 I 14949 6 806 00 0 9 /2 6 /94 OCT R WA H -.-- R Al20 �C: A S S 1A1. ' CAR NAUHES r.��:� u _ 25 CAR WA 7 . 5 C_f 1 �; i 21 22 149 6 t' 1 6 `„/ 0 09 ( .. � t S UPPLIES -- � Y VEHICLE L L. �y` • ---- ----- -- . - _ -. __ --- -- - --- - -�`_ .__ . - ')i S ER, ANDREA C: 26.6 26 . r_.: 9 23 I30 24 14951 692800 09/26/94 OXYGE14 CE MAINTENANCE MATERIAL.� }1 •, 26 1495: 700 09/Z6/94 FAKOY GENE INSPECTIONS FOR AUG 94 �28 -T-s. I NSPEC r IONS FOR AUG 9 4 T UZ4 . 18 6 37 38 jo 14953 710 09 / 2 6/ 9 4 P EOPLES ELECTRIC REP :�: r .- ._...___- .- ..._. �! A 111 I� / U "} I L T T Y - .�;. t � ._ 39 • F' 31 41 3 '' 149 7115 09 PHO T GO F ILM D 1 0. 42 s 4J _ _ - - - - -- -- -- D.E V E L O P 1 14 G F ILM 4 r 74 -- 1 � ■ �� 7 44 i1 45 1 . 955 T12111 09 / 26 /94 PLAZA T AND S E R VICE ThI h' j�: 'MAI /�,iEH 1�: �� -�c► 46 REPA I R MA 37 49 1#1 71...115 09 P OLA R C HEVROLET GE R •'�•. MAINT /V 1 f.. + T . 1, c.+ 1x.7.16 5 14957 74c_�600 09 /26/94 R.M. BROD11V O SUPPLIES 2 - ' S INC. TNC: FRS +GhA�( �►UFF.LIE,�; .:.10.00 Z1 .:f 1 41 54 4r 1495 1::00 09 /Z 6 /94 RAINBOW BOW FOODS PROGRAM SUPPLIES J . �• 5v !_l.� ..�.____ ______.�______ __._._ .._�_______ —._. __. PROG _ SUPPLIES .- � �_� . �- _.•_ _-- ____r__ _..---- _..__ ���� �,..�_�� � — . ---_, J7 1 X4 A � `= 741Z5 i.9/'Z6/ RAK CONSTRUCTION DLt�G . FE 91 91:;► REFUND .0t� 1 1 �i• , •..� � - . 1 _ r� 4G SURTAX F' E �i irl 11' 291 6 . 61 I 1 ' ' 4 7 PLAN CHECK 1 1. i o 3 0.34 63 4� 14960 741.31 09 R AM S EY CLINIC A 1" RAVEL & TRAINING 175. 00 1 X501 TRAVEL & TRAINING '7 87 66 .51 6 11 40 u 52 149 7 5 0 650 0 9 %: 6 / 94 REN TAL EQUIPMENT SALES CO. CONCRETE F-`7 u 51 __ —_ —�_- --- 57 -. - -- 69 .- 1:;3 70 I. ,a - J1 _. 14 '' r_r 7 0 RONS PRINTING PROGRAM SUPPL 72 '3 fJ 14 762 500 09/Z6/94 RUFFR.IDGE JQHNSON EQUIP. CO. SUPPLIES - VEHICLE t�� ,_,, �� +... 5 5 8 . t J7 { 75 I {16 I i ' � �����C:Ht � C C O O F M OD F F'A�� '- 1 /4 6./ 9.4_._-____0 1 -• 1 _- -__ - -- _ . 1{ T T E F FOR P PERIOD 09 it 5 ( C C:HECK V VENDOR' C CHEC V V E N DOR I I T 1 1 � � � C C H EC K, 5 NUMBER N NUMBER D DATE N NAM D DE A AM0 U1',l A AMOUNT 7 11 1 149 7 78 0 3 00 0 09 /26/ 9 4 S S &T OF P RODUC T S INC. S S UP P LIES O F F ICE 5 5 s s 10 SUPPLIES - OFFICE z z „2 1 11 _. . ._ S UP.P L�1_E: S _ -- ..OF t” I �: �::__.__..- - . - -_._ _...__ _.._ __ ....__.__ _._..__ �.__. _ _ _ ___.. _�� _� ��..,._��: � �_ - _ -. � � � _ ..4 -.�-- --�. � __ � 12 (I" S S UPPLI ES - O FF I C: E . ..: �= 1 13 SUPPLIES - OFF 'ICE 8 82.47 1 15 LC ,- r r. OFFICE SUPPLIES + bo . f 4 4 23.5 4 1 � 1 4 96.5__ _ .. . .. w H f _ , , 21 I ' 14966 (l f_l ( „) r1 0 09/26/94 S S EARS , , A L L TOOLS � �. 0 4 . 3 6 2 22 1 14` 6T 8 8 2 0100 0 09/ S SI DIGITAL F F ACILI T Y SC H E DULIN G S OFTWARE -T � ���C_, °� pw��� Z r� ... 3 �•�f�+00 0 09/`6/94 S S NAP — f N TO OLS _. _ ._.. w_ - -.. 3 ? ? I _ 29 149 c c :.; ; }fit c = _ 3 �;f��F�lcaE>'.:, NANCY h h:Erur D - SOCCER ' 'T rt } 7 7.00 31 32 14 8 8;0800 0 09/26/94 S S UTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATION L LEGAL & FISCAL 1 158.70 3 33 LEGAL ; {: FISCAL 1 158 ><'To 3 34 36 i 14971 8 831520 0 09/26/ � 4 S SPECTRUM COMPUTER & C COMPUTER HARDWARE: 7 7*7 w•:. 7 ::' 7 773. 38 f •, i ' ' , „, _ p .. ♦ r , r� •� - r+ .... I I l tt L � ��tt j tt 1 , pL . r - i , ' t! 4 r , {�{ r 1 0 . 0 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 8 8,61 I I 64 41 43 1 4`:�7;f 8 8� 0 �!•tj5 0 • �- r r� , , , t r r -, .� �`: � �_ an, ..C:I T .: " 5 539 45, :z f RE ( ({ } t t r _ _ 4 47 i i T R EPAIR i - is M MAIN T ENANCE MAT 5 ,::. w:179Z.41 441 50 51 GT . L .. FiAI�'l �E.Y... ME D -T C:.}�tL C:tN l' E R . S SUPPLIES_ . - _.Ef.���•f.:�.lw`_M:E.hl „ -- ...._�....... _ _ _ .. 7. - 7 � �' � _ 1 4974 842303 0 09/ S ST 54 1 i`� VOUCHREG � 1 Cll'Y OF MAPLEWOOD 3 4 ITEM CHECK "UC..HER/l.'.HECK. AMOUN AMOUNT 7 FOR PERIOD 09 9 3.73 109.57 10 11 12 10.00 10. 00 13 14 15 447, 7 447.07 16 17 CHECK VENDOR CHECK VE14DOR ITE 20 90.09 NUMBER NUMBER DATE NAME DESCRIPTION 23 Z" 5 Z .'a 8 24 FILM 25 10.70 10-70 26 27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1p 3 34.64 1498-1 881400 09/26/94 TWIN CITY AREA TRAVEL TRAINING !1 31 2--7 7 32 - - ----- --- 1498Z 901300 09/46/94 UP PER--M I D J_E J lR 37 14983 931850 09/26/94 WARN114G LITES OF MN MAINTENANCE MATERIAL 42 43 44 -R.-EP A.. I R--, M , N.. i-LITY REPAIR MAINT UTILITY 1 12 14984 941075- 09/26/94 w -UR 4E. Sj R _Uf- -L--!-ES- EQ..U-lF-M..EXE-- 14985 950100 09/26/94 WONDERMAT CLEANERS BLANKET CLEANED 14986 95021 09/Z6/94 WORD PERFECT CORP.-5.0 UPDATE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 14987 970700 09/26/94 YOCUM OIL CO. FUEL & OIL r } 14988 980800 09/26/94 ZIEGLER INC. MONFHLY BACKHOE RENTAL 129 TOTAL CHECKS 1 � 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60i .65 66 67 68 69 74 75 76 PAGE 10 � 1 3 4 ITEM CHECK 5 6 AMOUN AMOUNT 7 .1 8 9 3.73 109.57 10 11 12 10.00 10. 00 13 14 15 447, 7 447.07 16 17 44 .94 18 19 —a6-ljL, 4 20 90.09 201.37 21 22 23 Z" 5 Z .'a 8 24 25 10.70 10-70 26 27 28 3 34.64 34.64 29 30 31 2--7 7 32 33 2 1130.00 2- 34 35 36 37 1,481,948.60 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60i .65 66 67 68 69 74 75 76 YJ 44 '� 1 40 47 V4 1 . s LJ V4 F Ev*s'-*'-"L PL 4 U U j N E R Y i 7J PL UY • L -1" O'GI S E f! R' N I N (3- S Pi N D PI A "Y' P 0 L L IJ :ZIP 4 M I Ci i EL A (.3 U I'. E 52 1, 17 FOR -FHE CURRENT f 0 D 0 4 2 4 4 8 "T"' /-94 THERESE CARLSON 10 . 0 9100 IS 4 P A T rl I C. i 51 119 E It -1 s t- 04 0 f) 4 2 4 6 4 0 92/ Of 9 I I E N M A` ICH 1. b b w '5 -2--' ! 4 E E MARD LE V I N, Fj -4 C) 4 09:1 T 4 d 2 1-1. 4 cl 0 9 /* 10- 1 PALE CARLSOM 34 09 f 9 -4 i 4 J: e E 0 R G-f 1- P C u"I LYLE. SWANSON 09/09/94 MARGARET G 1 BBS 0 0 4 44L r 09/09/94 SHERRY ALLENSPACH 2 4 C) 0 9 9 4 G f s E (--i 0 R. Y J a P 1 E K A R. ice) 's 1 2 i � «} } »� 0 4 - LARRY'J CUDE 40 ilol (3042443 0 910-101 1+ C. I L E 01 A FI P E Lf 4 513 � i 111 1 2 1 C ')-A i+ L. Xf i--< y w I A N a» s.. 4. 6 lot A- --A- 1:1 Ci r.1 I CIA L� T V— f—t YJ 44 '� 1 40 47 A -4— - - -1 J '2462 -)'3 / C-) '34 j- 4 WENDY KLAGER `.-3'3 5 a t' k _ j .491 V4 1 . s LJ V4 I.-) t_ N E R Y i 4 1 IJ :ZIP 4 M I Ci i EL A (.3 U I'. E 52 1, 17 0 4 2 4 4 8 "T"' /-94 THERESE CARLSON 10 . 0 9100 IS 4 P A T rl I C. i 51 119 E It -1 s t- 04 0 f) 4 2 4 6 4 0 92/ Of 9 I I E N M A` ICH 1. b b w '5 -2--' 9 09 '9 4 E E MARD LE V I N, '3 C) 4 09:1 T 4 A C. A S A P E.-2! 4 C:�'4 5 34 09 f 9 -4 U Hv 1 1.01 J J A iN 1 * C2 .4 4, 4 c- 0 C) 412 4 5 4 LYLE. SWANSON 09/09/94 MARGARET G 1 BBS 4 i2 6 C) 0 9 9 4 G f s E (--i 0 R. Y J a P 1 E K A R. ice) 's 1 2 i � «} } »� 0 4 - LARRY'J CUDE 40 i Cy C-i 4 2 . 4 5 8 9 09 M-PIF-A i 1) S T Elf *t Lf 4 513 09 !` ? »� IJ IJ 4 W I LL 1 f-IM fl ill JA*%.'vLz.3KA 2 I 3, 2 0 A -4— - - -1 J '2462 -)'3 / C-) '34 j- 4 WENDY KLAGER `.-3'3 5 a t' k _ j .491 13 Q 0 9 Pj 4 DEBORAH D E H N . 52! _7492 0 f) 4 2 4 6 4 0 92/ Of 9 R i eMA RD MANGStEDEM I. '3 1 54 L 4':-D 4 6 5 c34/ 4 1;; L A 1\4 A K PIAI-HEYS 1 .4 6 f »� x s.�t s'"....s 0042466 09/09/94 MARGARET G 1 BBS EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND f-- DEDUCTION ECKS 1 •: °.�' `2 vj 0 1 5 6 7 1'::4 I 9 � 1 10 » _ . .. _ ,� _ .4 BETTY D _: � _ 0 G 161. X 11 12 0()'! 3.. 2 9 r }.. f 9 ` + 4 P T 1 1 C I A F R y .i.#. ,13 114: 0042472 1 51 9 Y» ,r � 17 _ _ 0 C-) 4 2 4 4 0 9 9 9 4 BON1*4 I E 0042475 0`3 18 12�� - t , .. -*-1 It-/ .16t 22 r I 23 00 4 ' 24_ 7 7 f= t _ J J :3 r, j' �,} ' E If.? (�, � ...� i (. { _+ '{ f .,t � } 24 L.... + » ... .. ..f . 4 ►.. �.. , r 1 'a # � r 1 E L :. �. A R L E t � t:� .k 1 a ..r 4 25 27+. . 29 j, }s { { _ { { ( " I L t } { 30 00 2480 C") 9 ' Y-4 9 4 32 : f„tF_ :' t:.:.4 1 O �.. `'"€ �` `J 4 CA��'I...�I....E L.. R 11...•�i 1 33 r 1 34 .. .. �E.... �...� �... » ».. • .. _ 7 _. t.. µ i i =.{ f t .. =3 • _ •,• .� 5 ff = M 35 83 _ _ (3 7 � {�»�} -��, "` �� , { F_ CA R O L . }• � - �. F � X38 ». �... . 3 M 1 ! N � �`� � � b s� _...� . I E_ . 39i M » ,.. » y , ..., L... r [... 1 9, ...r • 't 5 ti . . • _•! ^ • 5 f' `. f.�.» i:. r4C 41 ROBE �4? 0042 87 VERNON At � 1 45 r ..... r•- 1 a7 _ l.......; LA � � »� ` ::r f + �..� `� f r `M d'#' � �"'� 1� i 1..! 3.... N E L S 01 = i 4$' r 1 491 » »9 � r 1 5 3 h� 0 4 I-ER 38.94 5, 6 004249.3 09f 1 57[ 0 u� | o,~ApAqq 0 | 0 | *I 01 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ' FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD SER CHECK DR-TED PRYEE AMOUr 09/09/94 JAMES YOUNGREN 2,512.11 2, 379 39 2 si3c). 00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0003 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS ' FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD SER CHECK DR-TED PRYEE AMOUr 09/09/94 JAMES YOUNGREN 2,512.11 To __Y C-li .... !D 1 E W 0 D E f-A*Yl:;Ufl L D, VlPli IYE"E CiFE"I EkRINIINGS Af,411 t - E* D U C T 10 1%tl E E C: K S e 1, F01' R H E Ce 'U r-41" PAY P! E 0 D CHECK FN U ry 1 B E FR C. H E C K DH I ED HPIOU11 f 121 _7 0 } _ } ' r s':"z' 1! 2 T C) 9 13 4 PACIL E v E R 0 3 t•1 y f )4251=. 9 ')`3 9 4 L Y iN D A B J OrR, Pft ftl A N 4 Es 004"523 0 0 9 PD 4 R 0 9 E R I E VORWERK 1 76 7., 6 j+ 2. 5(2 4 0 - 194 7 0 0 -T I C S E P IN A BERGERON, 1_32. 4 2 09 9 9 J A r7l E E H i rii b f s b Q 0 4 25" `6 3 I.0 9 9 4 JON A MEE L A N D E R 2 C),-3,3, 67 iJ i l6 l 12�32 7 C) -0 7 v 74 0 - jAMES M ETIMEEM buN q i a' ! 71 4 i_=.' 5 i_2 B 9 09f' = 94 Fj 1 E j W T i DU L- i HM6% i zz C A+ A a DI a 1201 0 4 2 2 9 t 09 0 '3 19 4 JANET L i*,11-4D 1 fqL 1 1211 221 C! 04 5 3 C) 0 9 7 3 7' f9. J LIE A S_ 7 JUL A R M% K :23 l2i 74 1 -4 s c 0 T 1- H." Enlr 2 - -.t rr :250 1126 C ) 0 4 2- 5 3 _2 OS-4 09 94 L I ND ADELSON i 0 510 127[ i _70 4 Z_ 5 3 1_31 o 13 9 S DA "Y i 0 L Wl"I'14ULD JC � f » } Z« ' 1W t»: 34 09 :09 `19: WAL E R A ` F E Y I- N) 131 1321 0 4 } _2-'5 5 0 9 09 /9 4 Jos E P H F` -4 R Ll ':S; 3 20 1 2 34 53 _t .. )9/09/94 j I LL Pt E T E P-.,. S T, S T. 0 0 05 361 %'.3`7 3 )9 3 H Y ral E L I- L H U U, H' I.H R, 1 01042536 .09 /09/94 JUD I TH WEGWERTH 2 1� —2 L)5 0 if t t 5 3 J. I C: 5 :' ._ F G HAMER 4. 1 4- 411 i421 f**) 4 c, tzt 4 Q Q `J Q `34 jU D Y M (-'HLEBECr**-. 1 2., 12. 8 " 140 tj 042541 W I L.L 1 All PRIEFER 1 481 u 20 146 0 4 22 5 42 9 4 0, E R Fit t) W M Er Y E R 85. 5:4 i 147 48 j ..0 i ..e J, a 4 _4� A 1",i E M 1 U 11 H L L M K 1-4 f 90 + i:--' t:tU j+ 'D P-3 4 BRYA t4AGEL. 4 52i E)42545 3 9 Z 1?/ 9 4 IDA kli ii j-, L-U I 1 3 9 o, v Z5 31 0 E_'5 4 6 o 3 J _J .4 JAi%,IES DARST A S : — r r ) f �{ 0 2 "=-(.,P+'7 09/09/94 LANCE L U N D TEE N, 1 To 4 25 5 8 09/09/94 WILL11AM PRIEBE CITY OF-- t-iflAFFILEE-WOOD )f-ll 19/09 94 E SSLER t-7 R M 3..T 1 WALT' 'ILL 0 101 Q { � M 0 " Y ' E E i3 j. e %ss AND i::'AYRC- J c 1J) U L. i C . 0 ... 0 9 9 4 R 0- 0 P, E i 11 P W PE R i OD 9 (--)'3 9 4 0 1 J B R E N P-.! E R -f. 0 9 94 BARBARA A. KRUMME'.*. t-)kj! 2563 0 9 » 9 5- 4 'EE "I 0 k".) 4 - 2" 4 1"IUMUER aulw HY if! 13 U P 2 9 09 93 4 i P= R i CHARD STARi-%" 0 04 - —2 1 dV C 19 10 9. 9 4 F L A U S- 1 G HENRY P 109- 3/ 9 (J Cl -l'+ 2 5 4 9 f ! f !., 1+ Joi �-3ci A+ DENNIS P LINDORFF 0 0 4 1*-'5'%: -1: 0 09/09-/94 RONALD:J FIELEY., I 111s26 8 76 Ira VJ W A S 0 N r-" Z:3 I'll 0 0 -44' c'2'5 7 1 9 9. 1 4 04 E R 1 C lt,, 0 OSWALD 1 2- 1G. 7, ! � : .,k j 4 /9 4 R 0 P,4 A L D L FR 91 3 113 2 5 5 r �'# } w } _ �s }..i t. f �`. J4 1 1 NDi:--, Lom RANDAL L i4 .161 C) 9- C) q- 7"3- 4 jAME C-3 1 AS 1. :-lo zi 12 0 k -Ad + R 71H 1 1-1 Y'Z l CHARM E 3 3 1 22 il -:2 t, 5 7 4 L 0 13 0 9 79 4 DEIIlq 1 S t: P E Cl t ; t s !3 2 0 4 25 5 8 09/09/94 WILL11AM PRIEBE 0 13. I. 1 19/09 94 E SSLER t-7 R M 3..T 1 WALT' 1, 5 b. 5.. i.::- l �o 0 C* 4 2 5 G 0 ... 0 9 9 4 R 0- 0 P, E i 11 5 fs i 9 (--)'3 9 4 0 1 J B R E N P-.! E R -f. 0 9 94 BARBARA A. KRUMME'.*. t-)kj! 2563 0 9 » 9 5- 4 L 1 31 A )I 9 0 k".) 4 - 2" 4 09 9.1' Sl 4 B R U C." E A f--4 D F- S 0 N 3 004256 5 9 09 93 4 i P= R i CHARD STARi-%" so" 00 0 04 - —2 1 0 51 0, 5 f'--HAEL 0 P. A ff 109- 3/ 9 P 0 13 3 ANE'll"ERSOP4 "D ILL-) 4 2 5 6 8 9/ C-) r3l./ 9 4 DENNIS P LINDORFF 1 ROLAMD 8 HELEY CT VJ W A S 0 N r-" Z:3 I'll 0 0 -44' c'2'5 7 1 9 9. 1 4 MARK A M:-`RUSlKA 1, 9&4x 3 1 W lbO -'Am P.- 5 5 el" I D E L D E C- P.'-. E R 72 1052 t klj IPI 3 rl A T'll 1- W K L I ��,4 G E t .4 0 9 I;r---i 4 MYLES R BUR 1 34v .Ell F--A i -10 17 4 (a 20 211 i22 123 124 120' 1 2' 1 127 ,28 2 0 130 311 3 2 �' a �.-} s:-t . i L 13 i 4 !3115 I T 31z 14 41 jy 0 0 0 "V .. -2 0 4 25 7 t -1 0 9 091 - 792T I Cl F Ffl A L E 7 Cl C- i D 4 1 t:%Q 4 t•.. '- I IJ 9 .4 Ell-1-1 P 0' R, US R E f`:4 N 1 r rl-11 i- P EE 4b��%: H f-WROLL CC"S 4 1 i 01042580 09/09/94 4 L- 1 LJ U 5C 6 13:7 0 9 F F---. p i 1ju I 1-i H Cl Fiv. Zz- 1 �; . 1».. t... g '_! }�} 1 r '461 IF �CK UMBER C -19E CHECK PH V -A I ED E E- HillClUl 4 f C-) 4 i 2 f5,63 3 R ITA MACY b 1) 0 00 4 C? 9 :14 0 9 9: 4 M-41 HLEEM4 M D(IFIER-1 T 4 t,. 1 » ) 4 -6-1 y H;; CYJ 09 /':j 4 L-4-41- .L •s • { i } } ''i �-+'s #"iii } "'! i . » !. �. _� a 4 i 0 F F FRE Y C -I L' ,`3 0 N A 1-31. 67 :6! '9 0 9 9 4 DOUGLASJ T A U Bfil A N 4 cA- T 7 MT 13-311K%E0 L • 0042588 0 i5e i:) 4 jOYCE L L }. V °'1 C-i S TO N 11 5 2i I L. ; ()f)4i25-77 D i A R E W Vi AY "A N C 653, 6 - 2 i -10 17 4 (a 20 211 i22 123 124 120' 1 2' 1 127 ,28 2 0 130 311 3 2 �' a �.-} s:-t . i L 13 i 4 !3115 I T 31z 14 41 jy i;44� 0 0 0 -1 .. -2 0 4 25 7 t -1 0 9 091 - 792T E- 0 HEM L. L.. 'S 4 1 t:%Q 4 t•.. '- I IJ 9 .4 fin, A R El R K U PAD E 4 1 i 01042580 09/09/94 JEAN P-4ELSON 5C C 41-25 8.3 1 13:7 0 9 F F---. p i 1ju I 1-i H Cl Fiv. Zz- 1 �; . 1».. t... g '_! }�} 1 r '461 9 E i3 .4 Ai%%4P%4 E HUFFCHIP-4SON 11 40 C-) 4 i 2 f5,63 3 R ITA MACY b 1) 0 00 0 4 5 8 4-- C? 9 :14 0 9 9: 4 M-41 HLEEM4 M D(IFIER-1 T 4 C-585 0 i:.j f 19 /9 4 MIA F -.1 .I. E 13, H 0 F F FRE Y C -I L' ,`3 0 N A 1-31. 67 '9 0 9 9 4 DOUGLASJ T A U Bfil A N 4 cA- T 7 MT 13-311K%E0 L • 0042588 0 i5e i:) 4 jOYCE L L }. V °'1 C-i S TO N 11 5 2i I L. 0 Z Lam.. 5 S 9 0 _4/ l - 3 9- 4 - ' V -I.-ElviNEI-11 R u E R T S Z&: 1 51 n -" -)042- i9c) Oq C) 9:/ P 4 THOMAS L-3 E K 2, I FR A T%l D " —D 0 'El 1- 1-1 Cl M A !-3 E EASTMAN 9 9 -4 H ) j ivi 4R' Cl R,` E 0STR01, . + 0042592 0.., r lw) 9 94 N I CH L.. R.... AS N CARVER 1 -1 7 4 G '72 Ot A+25 -03 CY9 /0 r,7 PEI 4 R I CHARD NO RDQU I ST J4j - t-4 09 f.. }' . , + ' 4 L)AN I EL F E"' U C H F 7 El DWARZ A NADEAU. �«� .••� 1` i;44� 0 0 0 3 0 9.11 '3 4 KAY L E "',,!E PE'T E RSON 5 17. 47 7/09/ -54 jILL SCHOE19ECKER 3 a L '461 147 PJ 4 iv LJ Y C t 4 1481 ,49L '9 0 9 9 4 DOUGLASJ T A U Bfil A N !021 0C 42t99 9 Cl -9 9 4 1- 1-1 Cl M A !-3 E EASTMAN I `5 7 1 `:5531 0 E, CY9 /0 r,7 PEI 4 R I CHARD NO RDQU I ST J4j - )42601 C-) 9 09 �3-4 El DWARZ A NADEAU. �«� .••� 1` 0-1 O l " } £"F �{ 1... E W O O D #..w F � # I L 0 .� E G R �._# t.... A r, P 1 1 % 4 t G � r3 �t� D # —` !•'•� �� _ # ti 1...1 �.� �.... �.� � �.} �. � �1 � .#. " CJ P4 �...' #' } #.... #N..• #'. t...'t S S TED F Yf •..}'�!• } «. l...t }..• F.... N } w.� 1 1 r ... ,J w) 4 s.r'i E • tt 3.... # t •# �) « } J t« P% w. t.rt F r� Jt t•..t }• { .. ! } } i.. �• _ ;,s E r } _ .. w y wt r, ,{ tt «} = «1 =t _. 4 1i = t rf' I � - i H A }.... W t.«. �.» tw` i � ;{ t. ; }.... L A t'� t., i q !r } ?w} P.» i „ }J ,« 7 st »} f 94 ROi�E t't W B F HL«.. I �� . 1 +� 4 1 t. «t, U f ! i F N F! x.#. }..w �...t F w s .. } «+ } .. F• f ..f 4 DAV s E D S O 1 t • ! f }. t t t t _ }" ! l ~• 'f } } ~«f r.. s . _ rr J } 7 ` ! w1 . }� ! � { �st t }} ! D G E t t ? l A 1 4 A.. �: .• .i. .�. �..3 • .J rr►. .J. . 1 r I 0 , 0 ' { - #• 2 S 0 1 8 C w. l 1 « w. 79 V E # t I "S "' E f t %6 !,? � f" t _ r . }» i Jt 1' .. {. # ii ..� i..{' �.t M - t • 1 12? l b.w t t.. N. r 1 _ .f : ..s 4 li - fi Q l t4' 19 T r w c #...# 't • F } I23 Q -d t" + ' �-V L L ' :2Y i . s..a C) ! «f .: : t ::e C �...�N��'•i I �:» WE R m AG�.:..R ' . ! a 8-4. 126f` « '27f ! 2� i Cl }rj1.L1....Lwt 'r;'i' }w :. : C ... :_ .» 4 EL d.. AB ». # t� s.. t E I L t { n- . }« t-«t Jr Fr 1291 I 3C ! _ �.• F » °.#• �.�.t.:..5 VOID — ? _� `: ;• _• = .1 � — : —. — « { •. 1 " .�. f' �»� F ' } . r� t 3 �.... +mot 6.,, ..� }"7 i 1 w ..: "'# s• t i 31 0 �.t G V O « ;. l t «J 3... ' T'" l �.... » i 4 .k �.... t... s. t.» 5 • 132; -1 31 1341 0 ! _ 4 2 :t :. r` } r i _ f .' ...#• "_ , ;-- #- i..« ._ tr° t.r 1 #~ i .r S !••-# K. �rt }W. r` 5 F::: �-#� ,. ::T F ::. • i354 `t G * –) 0 d '#' L... c 1 8 VOID 1 • «} � : _ 0 fJ # .. .� €.? � t... . ,t,{ Fw.. #•t { 1 ir. >~t : t...t s .„t 46 � _ 09 r'� =«} � I 3 1 4 1 t«.• I' l l #••4 RE I .5. R i.... �4 1 Y F i � • � i " 4 s...� I.J ! 1 1 d.f 2 � .t L... }.. 0 .» : J 1 r ... 1 w. 4 FI RST 7 t t « s m i • Iii i { «} f " 1 . s.#. F.». »t 1.... VOID w r !•.. } r � ! «t r . r _ i t t " i l.»• • � j `I F r rl �...� #..'F L E W O � � � i # «� C* �_ i A r -. •{ •: i T3 i 0 1 � .{. «f ..._ ./ 0 9 '09 • t STA TE-- R ":. " , i _'.' i s i t s "..' 687 3. .... I * n _hJ+ f « A• }..« ..t 2 1..3 r • r .«• »{ E A 1 1w« t...t .. w 1..1 » w Jt r « T .. " •s .... .... . . . ..... . . ..... .... ... . ~# .. .. .. }.. :..t .i. }.:..t : .� =1 '/�'. ..� «_ _ }. ». s.»t L... 1" _..•{ } }'.- -i =- »} ...• t .. ...= i J • }�• {t t '7y { � 1.«..#. 1.i } #... 1 1. 1 t J 4 .; # •i t..: 1.... f Z... s...t t«.� : r .. _ L I �.. }. }..} ; }.... +.«2 �.... VOID }» »} I� • r f" U T E tom' WAY - � S ' l - P N � LU i....' - t "_ _ R L... A 1 r }... �` h... VOID .. 4 t7 0 = t M5 t t; r ?r . 2 t.. t A :. .3 i 10 3' i � " _. « i « 'v t{ :t »} _ , •_} •« + �.:. t �::. VOID }_'f +.} i y_ji- i _ ... f w �. � .:.� 4 i -• 7 3 -s { s3 it P �w B L 1 �: E � � �- A 1 t �... i �. � t �. �.1 •� 1 �-•a w_ �_ _.� ...�. } y' �6 t C ! ! « }'i.#' C2 t 3:.. i«1� .1 { } ' t * r 9 . 4 f w * s MU y F�} s •� t r . .3. I ; _ t..� E..i 1..i " } t .1. t � «s =r � f..j • • • i b::. ,..l 312 v 0 1 D 3 f •« ». 7 w L... , t f 1 f L 1 f » w:? l« L., J. i :. } .. » l o t }N }1�}wt4„• Ni } _3 : ..J. + C 1 3' ' PUBLIC EP3P 1 +E .i. I",�.PSt... 1 As�s0c 6 r� 2 i } «) 12 i Gl 13 YNt �• C) _ , y „ r 4 }.... 6 3 4 Y r t 0 9/ 0 9/ 9 4 i'T �» w E w L. i i - - - � �'•� r '"� �y . i _ ,3i- 4 » ~ _ �� . »' }.� V 1 i r t 1 _ .. » w 99 i i j 1...• F" » i } i i ..• !.»•�t i.» . . . • �. ;:.� 1 8 00 t....6 3 ' fir 0 9 /9 4 M E T RO SUPEHNISORY A �S S�,.�G 28" oo j � 21� • • • i b::. ,..l 312 v 0 1 D 3 f •« ». 7 w L... , t f 1 f L 1 f » w:? l« L., J. i :. } .. » l o 1 f .. ;�» x +1.:.�::tti.'»�ti..i V 0� D } _3 : ..J. + C 1 3' ' PUBLIC EP3P 1 +E .i. I",�.PSt... 1 As�s0c 6 r� 2 i } «) 12 13 YNt �• C) _ , y „ r 4 }.... 6 3 4 Y r t 0 9/ 0 9/ 9 4 i'T �» w E w L. i i - - - � �'•� r '"� �y . i _ 17 }�� d t �• matt » � Lw . 2 VOID i.. t•;.7 } «� f ` ,;,7 i i j 1...• F" » i } i i ..• !.»•�t i.» . . . • �. ;:.� 1 8 � 21� _ _ • 22 « k... ».` w»� » .« .+ » .... ». 1 t•# to S i~^ F - ,• }.. �..� }_ } s. t s .. »� •�•#' • j 23 } . 1 . } •� ; ;..} t :J rt }..} :. tt ` .4 P UBL I C .. 1..� i " 1 f"'� i }.:.. .ii. .".. }' I :«. '•< }» �"� �.::+ ti:_► L» �«.. , 6 !24 �f » ..tt� VOID 25' 2M r. �28 VOID 0`3: f �+� � 4 PUBLIC � �P RE �" 1 �� � � � � � �L��.: ��. »• 23 » 1 1 29 inn 51� , . !"j 7 jy 1 51� , ,561 235. 54 �� s 52 p3 ,561 235. 54 �� s AGENDA NO. 4�02-m-w Action b Cou ncil: AGENDA REPORT Endorsed,..... Modified....... TO Cit Mana Rejected..... Dat PROK& Finance Director A RE: THIRD QUARTER PAYMENTS 1994 CONTRACTS WITH PARKSIDE AND EAST COUATW LIKE FIRE DEPARTMENTS DATE: September 15, 1994 The t hird q uarter fire department pa are due at the end of September and as y ou know the 1993 and 1.994 contracts have not been si for Pa and East Count Line Fire Departments. Therefore it is recommended that the third q uarter p a y ments , y ments be based upon the amounts in the 1992 contracts. c:\wp5I.\4Lgn\fire0994 AGENDA NO. F --- -3 AGENDA REPORT TO: Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director Ac by-- evim. q 0 1 ,ftdo,= - Nodiflea. ]Raj eote Data.- -- - RE OFF UNCOLLECTIBLE FALSE ALARM CHARGES DATE: September 15, 1994 P&O- QSA L It is proposed that delin false alarm char totalin $950 be written off as uncollectible. B ACK ROUND The cit char a $25 fee when public safet personnel are sent in response to a false alarm provided it is the third false alarm within six months. In some cases the false alarm fees are not paid. Since 1989 a total of $950 of false alar bills have not been paid and a list of these is attached. We have experimented with filin claims in conciliation court for the false alarm bills. However, several bills remain unpaid after court action and the court filin fee has now been raised raised to $20-per claim. On September 12th the Council tabled a proposal to amend the Maplewood Code to provide for 'iffie, false alarm char Since the unpaid bills are for small special assessment of delin I amounts, it would be best to write them off as uncollectible and not waste an more tune on them. RECC, MMENDATIM It is recommended that the attached list of delin false alarm char totalin $950 be written off as uncollectible. WAaPVAW1 DELIN(...!LJEl*,4T FAL,SE ALARM BILLS CAROL NELSON _ NOR 33 _ IIA TE i ... _+ ^t i ^y L.: •^ri.;: ,•,,,,± � ^� .;� s ..tom i d iN 1^ j »�j« «. +.....j�;�i ... »i..�j 47 OES-2 6w..90 K u i...t.ash Res i d of is e fE 4 ' lJ i.-3 } "� } y � � " +� }„� } t...t u r S i�' s o i s C a r Wash L«. ti..j s } _� }..� 05 :.. .�f t ...� .�. t1��1.� j jM }.{ •j« C» I a F': i». t+ }_� } «� } «�d.i ». 14 ..F «�2 t j •• _ s • _ »{ i «:t 1 J. j ; »rtwt + •ti:.:t }. » j..} I »)d' .� ' ....sJIiz+ { fi . Z " ""' g ;t ••4 ••, 5 f j ��, ..,•, .t;;, w» 9 : - J .. .t; . :..'': L» }.. ;.'» t : . »� j »F ».. :� . »» `.: s. t . R o land � } {, i • F Lw 0 W » � I. w� M. " ..-. ... �• j }»:. s.�s {, {{ • {�,, .{» vi E ..t f' "• S & 4»t I 3 t E. • •'J i... j " ti }.r. s...t sr •..�' f • ,}•• ;-.j +..f ..ai ___ ..j c G 1 ass t 't i' { I {�� G � ..� . � .#. k. « s «' k »t ..." i�.. s.» + t �.: Gi iii t� i d y r •� "• L.» s... tr 7 l H UGH I .k •. t=`�.° ' "i, •;sL» »i a Edw � }"I��. ha«»° L•'5. Ql°� t �• w 4 • 3 2 ' ... .'.•1 J.» _... F. » a •► i - F c ~i S ; } T h t 1 S S } b 7 5 - , _ C o - _ S i a qq ... j . ..�, } Dk.:.� ._ • .•Fs i::: «... �..} at �^ fM{'�. {"'{ I Rep .k ay ti... }..� tr } « }.•} !"'}Ss »� � � #' } "� .....k.. L San •« "' I lC3 e r'�.{�t t -.-;P i..._ ...» {•-{ ms { "a • »• i." & l � i } { } ^ 1 ! •�^t {'f »A } " )� c .��� y r } w a s ..... }2. �».'.....r'L'�' • I a 1 Rep .k zk,� l...•.. »f o F t 3 t ; _ _ _ }" ' "'• : s :a w« r "} iw{ t Re R y i? 5. 0 0 - - - -- CAROL NELSON MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Mounds Park Academy DATE: September 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed, Modified . — Rejected Date On July 25, 1994, the City Council reviewed the conditional use permit for Mounds Park Academy. The Council tabled this item to allow Mounds Park Academy and the neighbors to work out their problems. The Council requested that the staff place this on the September 26, 1994 consent agenda DISCUSSION There were two main issues —the parking lot lighting and a request for fencing across the Price Avenue driveway. (See the attached July 19, 1994 staff report for background information.) Regarding the lighting, please see the attached letter from Mounds Park Academy. They plan to put a timer on the parking lot lights and add two new lights on the sidewalk near the new addition. The Academy expects the new lights to arrive about mid- October. They will begin using the timer after the new lights are installed. Regarding the fencing, I previously recommended taking no action. The Council should table this review until the new lights are installed and the Academy starts using the timer. The City and neighbors can then decide if there is still a problem. RECOMMENDATION Table the review of the conditional use permit until November 14, 1994. go/b-8: mounds. mem (14) Attachments: 1. Mounds Park letter 2. July 19, 1994 staff report September 12, 1994 Mr. Geoff Olson Community Development Department City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: Following the City Council meeting of July 25 at which the recommendation was made that MPA look at changes to our current parking lot lighting, a group convened on August 2, 9:30 p.m., to brainstorm. The electrical contractor, architect, owner, owner's consultant and the neighbors at 1722 Ruth Street were all represented. The electrical contractor confirmed that we already have a yellow type lens, but because the fixtures are new, the lens has not had a chance to get dirty and dim naturally. Foot candle readings were taken at multiple positions in the parking lot and were found to be in compliance of the one foot candle at the line rule. Therefore, we tried to solve the glare problem without necessarily reducing the light in the lot. A temporary shield was attached to the light at various Lengths. Four inch length is the longest that the electrician had ever seen` used. At 4" the footcandle reading was significantly reduced; however, the neighbors felt that the light was just as bright in their house. At 4" the edges of the lot were quite dark and the general consensus, was that the safety of the lot would be reduced significantly. As a compromise, we decided to put the 4 parking lot lights on a timer so they would go off at 11 p.m. on a regular basis. Generally the custodial staff are the only people in our building after that time.. For the few nights a year that an event is going on past 11, the lights will remain on until the event ends and the parking lot clears. This way we will protect our constituents and help the neighbors. To solve the problem of darkness near the building, we are adding two 12' lights on the sidewalk near the new addition. These will light the sidewalk and hopefully safeguard the building and all of the glass along the west side. Although this option adds unforeseen cost to the school, the parties involved all feel that it is the best solution. Therefore, MPA has moved ahead and ordered the two 12' lights and will have a timer installed. The lights were ordered mid - August and have an 8 week shipping time. As soon as they are installed, the timer will be activated. Sincerely, Paula A. Miller Assistant Director cc: Jack Buxell, Architectural Forum 1722 Ruth Street neighbors 1736 Ruth Street neighbors 1744 Ruth Street neighbors MOUNDS PARK ACADEMY 2051 East Larpenteur Avenue • .Saint Paul, Minnesota 55109 • (612) 777 -2555 507E reryded /20% post casumer MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Mounds Park Academy DATE: July 19, 1994 irvrROOUCnoN The City Council should consider the following items about Mounds Park Academy: 1. James Gandy is asking the City Council to interpret the code section about screening or shielding parking lot lights. Mx Gandy is the architect for the Mounds Park Academy addition. On May 27, 1994, I directed Mounds Park Academy to screen two of their parking lot lights. (See my letter on page 7.) Mounds Park Academy is objecting to this. They feel their lights meet the Code requirement. (See their letters on pages 8 -11.) We investigated the lights because of a complaint from Barbara and David Moeckel. They own the adjacent property at 1722 Ruth Street. (The map on page 5 shows their property and the location of the lights.) Mr. Moeckel told me that several other neighbors complained about the glare from the other lights. 2. The owners of three homes on Ruth Street are requesting additional fencing. They want the proposed screening fence on the west side of the parking lot extended across the Price Avenue driveway. (See their letter on page 12.) 3. The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Mounds Park Academy expansion is due for review. BACKGROUND Past Actions On February 25, 1992, the Community Design Review Board approved the plans to expand Mounds Park Academy. The plans included a six- foot -high fence along the west P y and south rop e �Y lines. The fencing did not extend across the Price Street driveway. P The driveway was open then. The Board approved the fence location, subject to the staff approving the design. Condition Three of the Board's approval required the school to "Direct or screen all parking arkin lot and outside recreational facility lights so they do not glare onto adjacent properties or streets. Light glare must not exceed one footcandle of light intensity at residential lot lines." On April 27, 1992, the Council approved a CUP for the expansion. On May 10, 1993, the Council approved tax - exempt financing and decided to review the CUP again in one year. On June 14, 1993, the Council moved to restrict the driveway at Price Avenue and Ruth Street with a type of blocking that emergency vehicles can use, and the block be placed far enough from the intersection so residents can gain entrance to their garages. On October 11, 1993, the Council moved to approve no parking on both sides of Price Avenue, east of Ruth Street. Code Requirement Section 36 -28 (c) (1) states that "Lighting shall not be directly visible from any residential area or public street. Lighting shall not exceed one footcandle at a residential property line." DISCUSSION Parking Lot Lights There are four parking lot lights. The three closest to the west property line are causing the :most trouble. The lights do not exceed one footcandle, but they do glare onto adjacent properties. On May 23, 1994, I measured one -half footcandle at the Moeckel's lot - line. However, the reflector from the light was glaring onto the adjacent property. Mr. Gandy's letter debates the meaning in the code of "lighting shall not be directly visible ". He feels that the lights meet the Code since the bulbs are not directly visible. The code does not state that the bulb shall not be directly visible; the Code states that the lighting shall not be directly visible. The reflector is an integral part of the lighting because it directly reflects the light coming from the bulb. Whether the light comes directly from the bulb or the reflector, the light is still directly visible. The Community Design Review Board condition is more specific than the code. It requires that the school "Direct or screen all parking lot and outside recreational facility lights so they do not glare onto adjacent properties or streets." Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines glare as "A harsh uncomfortably bright light." I believe the Mounds Park Academy parking lot lights meet the dictionary definition of glare. Screening Fence The Director of Public Safety recommends against extending the screening fence across the Price Avenue driveway. He feels that the drive should be available for emergency K vehicles. The drive is now barricaded. A permanent fence across the drive would prevent emergency vehicle access. Time Extension The Council should review this permit again on October 1. The Council can then make sure that Mounds Park Academy has resolved the light problem. RECOMMENDATION A. Require that Mounds. Park Academy do one of the following: 1. Screen the reflectors on the three westerly lights in the parking lot. 2. Replace the lights with fixtures that will not glare onto adjacent residential property. Mounds Park Academy must complete this work by October 1, 1994. B. Take no action on the request to extend the screening fence. C. Review the conditional use permit again on October 1, 1994. go \b- 7:lighting.mem (14) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 30 Site Plan 4. Letter from Tom Ekstrand dated May 27, 1994 50 Letter from James Gandy dated June 10, 1994 6. Letter from James Gandy dated May 9, 1994 7. Letter from Ruth Street residents 8. CUP 3 W Y C MARx M POND Z Non Z v Hazelwood o Pk W f a Q � J II LOCATION MAP / QUO N ROSE1+I+ D S AV N A/ PJ NORTH SAINT PAUL o � N E 0 0P I a 0RS 29 8 4 0 MOLLO*#AY 28 - G O 5 U M q W Q 'J� x „ o Hillside J �- Z5 �n , a Pt v� P a 121 � ,� �� kA '�.• a � a q Y • i 4J O �� 7 }. J K OLL z R IP 5 A " R 1 = Av Cl C a Y K I NM-T N AV i ........... �' p LA K Of PRIC A :: ac W .. 29 p _ ar ti LARPE NTEUR - - I1r¢�Ie� � .. good H 4M AY NAP v�Ew AV ATTACHMENT 1 RADATZ AV W (/) p t 21 PlR IVAM STREL'T . W KO H L µA N AV : (AXSS4B/ AV) R NO rH SA IN r PA UL 2 o CO > RD 2.3 et WE EHLL N,R22W W 3�2 lob p'`I j RD Harvest Pk DE MONT AV ~ 0 o BRO All Z ELEvr, . �T NT 2 1,- fbur AV XTAN T AV Seas oft PA c� �t GERVA1S GERWI GERVAM AV Z CT AND AEW AV Z r W s, /IKING DR W �4STLE AV 36 N Knuckle Head L oke E AV ••yam COPE AV RK N en n a' _ � 0 RIE a R x ' = LA RIE AD 2 Sher- 2 v HURST ¢ woodPk z AV _ o Y co > RD ..e.. N 2 5 AV O ftbilkh4od `�� , / O A I V p* J W a Q� RECR �" � 1R � i L �•�� _ E4T /0 h � RRI py Q N 4 4 A� • , • �, , f . , . ATTACHMENT 2 ( a m - • 1 • . �•�` 164 L55 N Q'' c ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ant ■ s ' f C ` . Fbl t,.7�t. y _ •,b 0. Ape p Imm ' 46 r ttw.js.+l'r '. J f 1 1 414kts, -.00 D ARCHER HEIGHTS APARTMENTS' P U D) �• r I L 4 . 5 FA M • to w T 1 + WILLIA 0 1 PE VIV9 ,o. 1792 1 � 1�140�3SL 4 '� f • ww•. ?•i t�wts.Il�_ ��..t43 r - -- - - ? 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 4� 4 1 - - • - - - - t - - - - -• -- - -. -• •_• •t• 21.. b 1786 -� ! N ■ R11 so Ds of 1780 , 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 C «1 . , &r) _ �► LAS&& A ■ .1772 AVE o �- G MAPLEW OD -15 1 mc, :4110 44d; .4 "OR) 1766 J 'A #all c 7 e 9 10 it 12 13 . 1758- .0 ; 0 c Y �� 1752 •,p ,,} i 2 ND ■ A D! :2 21 20 19 ' !15 . 1 Is 1744 13 � i 2p • 1736 .r — - - � i•• -1 d AV E . �1 ° (� 4 , uj 7 A 8 1 9 I G .. - - - -•- v Z too MOECML PROPERTY 172: :• :: _ ; W coo -. Asa c� � J �' . t ••. (Is a a 11 t�e.� ! •2 3 1714 ! r. Off% 2 /- i �o MOUNDS PARK PARK ACADEMY 170s r . 5 1 2 s 11 y .•c •se.• - Y , �. • � � . bG of . ',5C �a fit. 4 � • - r eft- 13 = X 10 g - - -- �.., v 1700%- °i MAPLEWOOD • • - 010 F i �" • = 14 z "' '9 6 1694, �" j PUMP STATION • . 1. 1.5 7 1686 2025 202 _ �o o 2095' _y .. LARPENTEUR AVE, 0 1689 E PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q LNaHTS CAUSING THE GLARE 5 0 000, "P HOLLOW AVE. PROPOSED BALL FIELD .PROPOSED TENNIS COURTS too PROPOSED �� HOCKEY RINK PROPOSED ADDITIONS At. I a Taw I EXISTING BUILDING • • • • LU SITE PLAN 6 ATTACHMENT 3 � -� PROPOSED SOCCER FIELD 6 N I IV J CITY OF ATTACHMENT 4. MAPLEWOOD y 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B A1APLE13'00D, DiINNESOTA X5109 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT May 2 7, 1994 James R Gandy Architectural Forum, Inc. 4801 West 81st Street, Suite 101 Minneapolis, MN 55437 UGHT GLARE COMPLAINT 611-7704560 This is to confirm our May 27, 1944 telephone conversation about the light glare complaint I received regarding Mounds Park Academy. This is also afollow -up to your letter to me dated May 9, 1994. I agree that the light intensity does not exceed the one- footcandle threshold outlined by the Code. I feel., however, that the light glare does violate the City Ordinance. The enclosed ordinance says that "lighting shall not be directly visible from any residential area or public street.' The light glare from the light - fixture's reflector, however, is directly visible from the concerned neighbors bedroom window. The .reflector is part of the light source, even though it is not the bulb. It is the object that transmits the light from the bulb. As you asked, I am writing this letter - so you may forward it to Mounds Park Academy. Please review this with them as soon as possible and call me to discuss a solution to the problem. I will check with you by the end of next week. I would like to establish a date for the installation of screening devises to block the glare or to discuss other solutions you may have. THOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER Enclosure Equal Opportunity Employer 7 ATTACHI June 10, 1994 City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Mounds Park Academy Parking Lot Lights The zoning ordinance requires that we meet the following: "Install parking lot lighting. Lighting shall not be directly visible from any residential area or public street. Lighting shall not exceed one footcandle at a residential property line. Residential areas are areas planned or used for residential purposes. The problem is that part of the requirement is definitive and can be measured with precise instruments. The other part of the ordinance which states "lighting shall not be directly visible from any residential area or public street" is undefined and vague with no measurable means of verifying conformance or non - conformance when taken at face value. It would seem to state that any parking lot light which can be seen from any public street would not be in conformance with the ordinance. If this is in fact the intent, we know that there are very few, if any, conforming parking lot 1 i ghts in the City of Map 1 ewood . If this is not the intent, then this portion of the ordinance should be dropped or redefined to allow for quantitative verification. Furthermore, the "Discussion is portion of our Conditional Use Permit Summary stated that: "the applicant should direct or screen all lights so that the bulbs cannot be seen. Code does not allow light intensity to exceed one foot - candle at a residential lot line". This seems to go further than the City Ordinance in that it refers to "the bulbs instead of "lighting" which was as specific as the ordinance went. Since most parking lot lighting is now designed with the bulb located well up into the housing of the fixture, out of direct view, this appeared to be more consistent with today's lighting design standards which rely on the reflector to spread the light from the bulb. we feel confident that we are in conformance with both of the requirements as set forth in the C.U.P. Summary. AICHITECTU14L FORUM, INC. 4801 WEST 81 SUITE 101 $ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55437 612/831 -5926 • FAX612 /831 -9069 City of Maplewood June 10, 1994 Page 2 Now, after having met all of the above specific requirements, we have been informed by the planning department that there is a "Light Glare l a i nt and that they feel "light glare does violate the city ordinance ". We were not aware of "light glare" being part of the city ordinance and we have no idea how "light glare" is measured. (We do not think the'staff knows how to measure it either.) We have also been informed that "the reflector is part of the light source, even though it is not the bulb". No where is this new definition Inc p Y included as art of our ordinance. The planning department is using its own subjective interpretation to expand the ordinance. Since virtually all exterior parking lot fixtures now have reflectors to spread the light, why did the requirements of the C.U.P. refer to the "bulb" if it was actually meant to be the reflector. They are not the same but i nct 1 different and separate functioning parts of a light fixture. distinctly The reflector is there specifically to spread light with reduced glare versus the bulb. We admit that the parking lot light reflectors are visible from the adjacent residential properties. I would also expect that they are visible from some places on Larpenteur Avenue, Beebe Road, Ruth Street and Price Street, just as the Maplewood City Hall's parking lot light reflectors are visible from sections of White Bear Avenue, County Road B, adjacent residential properties and residential properties as far away as those west of White Bear Avenue. The same could be said for most, if not all, of the parking lot lighting in Maplewood. The planning department told us that two (2) of our parking lot fixtures were going to be required to have screening devices installed on them. These two (2) fixtures were identified because of one individual neighbor's complaint of the glare. The Other two (2) i dent i ca l fixtures were not identified in my telephone conversations with Tom Eckstrand because there had been no complaints regarding these fixtures. Tom Eckstrand verified our contention that we meet the one foot - candle requirement but not the unwritten and non - definitive "glare" requirement, It should be noted that the allegedly non-conforming ng parking lot fixtures are approximately 90 feet and 180 feet from the property line and 160 feet and 250 feet from the complainants windows p Y (the house sets back approximately 70 feet from the property line). D city of Map 1 ewood June 10, 1994 Page 3 Mounds Park Academy is extremely concerned that any shielding the City may require will reduce the present lighting 1 eve l in the schoo 1 ' s parking lot to a level that the school feels would be unsafe There is considerable pedestrian traffic through this parking lot after dark especially during the winter months Is the City prepared to assume liability for mandating the school have a less than safe lighting l eve 1 in their parking lot? No where does the ordinance state that it is only enforced if complaints are received. We admit that the 1 ense /reflectors of our fixtures are visible, but we believe we have demonstrated that the portion of the ordinance stating "lighting shall not be directly visible" is vague and unmeasurable and that the planning department is adding arbitrary terms and unclear definitions to meet one disgruntled individual's wants in this one particular instance. The ordinance should be known and measurable. We are only asking that our parking lot lighting be evaluated as all other parking lot lighting in Maplewood is. We are also asking that unless you are going to require parking lot lighting throughout Maplewood to add shields to screen their lenses, that we not be required to do so either. We do not feel that one complaint should force our lighting to be held to a different standard than other lighting throughout Maplewood. Sincerely, ARCHITECTURAL FORUM, INC. Jaynes R. Gandy k Architect JRG /gmb cc: Paula Miller Tom weber Bob Stennes 10 ATTACHMFNT 6 May 9, 1994 Tom Ekstrand City of Map i ewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Mounds Park Academy Parking Lot Lighting Dear Tom: The manufacturer's representative of the parking lot lighting installed at Mounds Park Academy visited the site after dark on the evening of May 5 1994. His visual observations as well as the footcandle readings using a high caliber meter indicated that the school is in compliance with the City's criteria for approval for the Conditional Use Permit, which required that "The ,applicant should direct or screen all lights so the bulbs cannot be seen. Code does not allow light intensity to exceed one foot - candle at a residential lot line." The manufacturer's representative did indicate that "reflector flash" is visible from the school's west property line. The representative further indicated that although no skirt is made for this fixture, a makeshift sheet metal skirt could be attached which would shield this reflector flash. The problem with this would be that the performance of the fixture would be altered and the entire west half of the parking lot would be dark. This would create a safety concern for the school. MPA feels an adequately lit parking lot is essential to creating a safe environment for the students and teachers. This has always been a high priority for the school. Mounds Park Academy takes pride in being a good neighbor and they are also in compliance with the City lighting requirements as required by the Conditional Use Permit. Any modification which would create a safety concern could not be supported. If you have any questions or other suggestions as to how we could accomplish both parties concerns, we would be very interested. MPA wants to continue to stay on good terms with both the City and their neighbors. Sincerely, \ 1tN► �P James R. Gandy Architect JRG /gmb cc: Paula Miller, MPA Tom Weber, Weber Consulting Bob Stennes, Collins Electric A"ICHITECTU14L f'ORUM, INC. 11 4801 WEST 81ST STREET, SUITE 101 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55437 612/831 -5926 • FAX612 /831 -9069 ATTACHMENT } 0 xf 4 ,o",,00000000 Av I le cr,�- 60' .62 400g. O ft 0- 7 000 G ,C9 c �✓ /7a.2 wee$ Ar7 � g k 770 -936( ATTACHMENT 8 o tional Use Permit: 2051 E. Lar enteur Ave. (Mounds Park C ndi p Academy) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following were heard: Jacob 6uxell, Architect Kathleen Wind, Assistant Superintendent of District 622 d. Councilmember Zappa introduced the following-, Resolution and moved its adoption. 92 -04 -39 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, Mounds Park Academy applied for a revision of the conditional use permit for a school. WHEREAS, they applied for this revision to allow them to expand the existing school, WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2051 E. Larpenteur Avenue. The l egal description is: Tracts D. E and H of Registered Land Survey No. 396 as recorded in the office of the Ramsey County Registrar of Titles and a parcel of land described as follows: Commencing at a point distant 33 feet West of the Northeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22; thence running West 26 rods; thence South 22 rods; thence East 26 rods; thence North 22 rods to the point of the beginning, which lies within the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 14, Ramsey County, MN. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission discussed this application on February 18 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve said permit. 2. The City Council held a public hearing on April 13, 1992. City staff published a .notice in the, paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described conditional use permit for the following reasons: 13 4 -27 -92 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run- off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design, 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction must comply with the site plan, date- stamped January 14, 1992, The City Council may approve major changes, after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may approve minor changes. The Academy may phase the development plan. 2. The City Council shall review t h i s permit one year from the date of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. The City may, at that time, direct the closure of the Price entrance if traffic problems continue. 3. The school shall turn the tennis court lights off by 9:00 p.m. Only the school shall use the tennis court lights. 4. The school shall only use the area between the tennis courts and pond and the west lot line as a track or route for running during fall and spring cross - country meets. 5. The City Council may require that the Academy build a driveway to Beebe Road through the School District's property if the Academy buys the School District's building. 14 4 -27 -92 6, The City Council may require that the school chain the westerly access for evening events if they become a problem. Seconded by Counci.lmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor Bastian e.. Co nci l member Zappa moved to authorize all-way-stop signs at Price and Seconded 4 Councilmember Carlson Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker, Rossbach, Zappa Nays - Mayor - Bastian 15 F -5 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: City Manager Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner Conditional Use Permit Review Holiday Express Station 743 North Century Avenue September 20, 1994 INTRODUCTION action by. Coed i Endorse ► d Modifie Re j eoted. -., Date ON The conditional use permit (CUP) at 743 North Century Avenue is due for review. The CUP allowed the expansion of the fuel station canopy, an additional pump island and removal of the front five feet of the building. (See the maps and site plan on pages 2-4.) The Code required the CUP because the expansion was within 350 feet of a residential district. BACKGROUND On September 28, 1992, the City Council granted this CUP. On September 27, 1993, the Council reviewed the CUP and required review again in one year. DISCUSSION The applicant has finished his renovations, but has not provided the required stop sign at each exit. The City Council should review this permit again in two months. This will give Mr. Muckala time to install the stop signs. RECOMMENDATION Review the conditional use permit for 743 North Century Avenue again on November 14, 1994. go \b- 8:ho1iday2.cup (25) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan S ., LARPE NTEUR AV 1680N. T29N,R22W. o IDAHO AV 14 13 O 3 Q� 25 +24 W a1 T pNA AV (� (1) CURR I E ST (2) MYRTLE CT p LN. . I MICHAEL OR i£B R ASK A AV 2 RE B ECCA P IN E TREE OR DR (2) P 3 4 �::::: 4 B/RCHVIEW DR Yq A ! ! 4 4 0 N. � Nebrbsk+o Y P N 1 DR ... �• 1 144 Pk +t • BEMLANA >: -- -- N• 5 PINE TREEDR OAKHILL 6 BIRCH TREE DR 0 - -- i ANGELA �C'> ROLLING HILLS OR / ANTELOPE WAY Jlms' Prairie 2 AMBERJACK •LA MICKEY ' 3 B£AVERDALE RD 0 Q IVY _._ � — AVJ.`:::�: V 8 4 BOBCAT LA ELKHEA T LA _ jH /N QR C J FQY rr -� N Z << 2 1 1 I 31 QR . L HAWTHORNE AND Ip AV ANA: 1200N. 1200 N . E. ROSE N ST 68 8 µ �► :: h? Z GERPN� GERA 0 Bt�ve/ MAGNOL AV 4y a0 c� Geranium O n z Ptir Ea — t Ike W >_ Y Ar W •(\ W Q 5 ;. J Q ? c Y� Qo vE P•t�:>: Z Z AV � � p0 W � CASE AR ESTER z u- AV • 960N, 960 NG p� cr `TILL¢ c a W BRAND ,y� �, LA AV 32 32 SAE • oc Maplewood i Nature Center t� m Center -- " SEVENTH ST E E. _ Q Z 10 10 y BUSH AV f W a w W MINNEHAHA m AV e 72ON. 5 34 3 H MARGARET .. Pk Ole +y� 251A -j 480N. 4 err 265 � t 1 t 0 7 r" L _ L" o J Z FREM- DNT: w a i L �ii►- — — � -- — •-- --�) 252 � U. d I� �I J L CLAY .� c3 AV SERVICE DR 1210 1 is r S i �., � 1 I 11 lit. .1 '235 1 { 240 'L _ ../ 1 : 1 iL l a� 216 t l�i % , g 480N. LOCATION MAP Attachment 1 4 N 24 C3) : � to C � • Co c =� 160.701 • Boom LAJ (3is) tit �� 750 d b 749 ft4 A&W 744 -0 • • 743 749* UNION CE ETARY A M 1 743 • .:• '• 1 6 N C 4 X. X. .. ........... Li 0_ NsNf OU 6 5 S. (1p -VAL 49 9 C� CDO N L 2 A 1 A A %goo- NEHAHA AVENUE Im 12 MIN 10 1 to %vtoft.'s" W .u l Ba 119.0 0.01 zv .- I . I MCDONALDIS a; 05 0 .7 �1 P, 50m .f LLJ If 2730 (6) (5) 2696 C*4 C cc o i T, :, 269 Doti% 2700 a f ail} i (ro 0) z • 2702 rnm -% 419 J.- I 7 �1— op As m,z 6 dt 8 9 10 Iv i R 9 `... ID + 'r 015 . &-nb , ._, i C J C i V) (P) 3 i 2 } I I �� f 17) 119.0 Oki Itj MA RGAIR E:"r CA % AVE* WRO • ze 5.0z 2900 (57) 1 (30) 0 10 , ,,, �� 1 I 10 ARM -4 G" POC C) 9 fo N 9 'ro Vi I I a r- for fUlrk S i Co W LP. 4- ZO- pac. MELEE# dwmw� 1 1 U 0 6A f Co a 31 A 4% 21 to PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE 3 Attachment 2 4 SITE PLAN PROPOSED LAYOUT 4 Attachment y 4 N MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Time Extension PROJECT: Canada Woods East DATE: September 20, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by 'Counoil a Endorsed Modified Rejeoted Dat 0 0 - - Mr. Jack Menkveld, representing North Suburban Development, Inc., is requesting a time extension for the Canada Woods East preliminary plat. This plat would create fourteen lots for houses along Walter Street, south of County Road D. (See the maps on pages 2-4.) Mr. Menkveld is requesting this time extension because he is still working on the construction plans. (See his letter on page 5.) BACKGROUND On April 22, 1991, the City Council ordered the construction of Beam Avenue and Walter Street (with utilities) to County Road D. The contractor finished this project in 1992. On September 27, 1993, the City Council approved the following for the Canada Woods East development: lot -width variances, south - facing houses, rear -yard setback variances, a preliminary plat and a rezoning from F (farm residential) to R -1 (single- dwellings). DISCUSSION The developer is working with the City Engineer on final approval of the construction plans. The developer has built one house and started some rough grading. RECOMMENDATION Approve a one -year time extension for the Canada Woods East preliminary plat, subject to the September 27, 1993 conditions. go/b- 8:canwood2.mem (4) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Proposed Preliminary Plat 4. 8 -17 -94 Statement from North Suburban Development ATTA 1 VADN41S HEIGHn • . •. • N .. • t .' . • • • •� .• • . • 1 Sea 4b 9 a 40 o •• • • cou RD. O . • X . • ':Y :• • . i.YM 3 a: 5f. 04, G ae • 8EAM AVE. .• . 0 % law • • • • • • •. s %• • . ♦ • 4w 8 • ••• , • I �• •i1•. • .1• �• A. •• .•.. • • '•', ' •'• • , • •, .0 • • • ••` • iI� k o � •�•• w c •� a , Kchlman Lv Doke • . • KOHLMMI AVE • I � COUNTY I PLAZA ROAD C z3 � Tqp . 2 ALVERADO OR PALM 3 B OR • G11• r •1..� � � v 4 DEAUVIUE OR CT p o 3 MEMOIAN OR '�• S C` T. CONNOR �� �-- NOR Aml AVE. AVE 3 � DEW @ U. F OROO RS GMAI.S a PK* to Moog 0 lee •. :• • . • �.• • ♦ •.� • �I •��• • • • • • ,.+� AVE. 19 v COPE SITE LOCATION MAP 4 N 12 ROOKS �.. GERNAIS GR/1NIOVIEIN VIKING SHERRE AVE ' SITE LOCATION MAP 4 N 12 ATTACHMENT 2 VADNAIS HEIGHTS - ---- COUNTY ROAD D - - ►3ZZ.5 _ - - - - ,� 11 . 2 4 •.;. y r •• • • • • / � {•;.5,.. r :' f• r:` 1 'J'..•.,•i rr,'r:' r'•'� 3. 17 Z tit t 9' 8.2co `( •;:'• ; r • ,'; ;1r fi {''.'. f } ••; •, • •' { : � {y': 4M�'� .• r': %'•'•'•' { � .�{ rr •. • • r,J•'• •r Mr ,'• . •, ,• ,• . • • ,Ji ter.,. �•�.',J..,r.' ,•'"'l,;lr' �.; } .;•; •S�•' } {';;P'S � ' •' i i :':•:�''•'S"' :•1:':r %:,•i; }',�f f },''':•f �,•'r {••r;f {.; {r�� {:Y� :;•�;•�irf 10 ' Mr J,; y 'i • l • lr• �'� {.;•;.,•;i' :;: f;.`•4i{ • • ,,.5 , , . rr }r: r A rrJrr. r• .❖' rr • ` .'ts 1. 84 ac . • :Xl •4 '. W :ti' {: {;�;�5�: f. f �::i' :•::`: f { :; ?r y:%�• 1:;:;: mfr{ d: C 1 •i'• i•J :; '�J •i;:' : �:'i r,.r'' � : �r � {��• •••O �•::; :{ M} •''"' :'�' �:;rr :S {�•;::• S : {i';Y :;:;:; :rr: fK • � �,.Yr �; ;.r {:;�: :}:y} .•r:•{'r � ' . .s•. {vy .r ...;r •• ,0►.. ❖... • r ?;:?f�J ...,., ;,. { •. r. }} ' 1170 1 \y 8 .� C , ,r. r: {: f ,.•r.,., fiS r • : %•;:•f;:Y;•;•`f., }''1 ;:, ",f r ' O ' :'•' { {':•:: :`. {Y•''.... }' f,•` , fir'.''1J{Y�} :1. }' ,l:• l • : f • i•. ,,•,.� {.J;O,,.;: J l:':':'.; •'' :;. •;:; :5•• }} i•;'rA•S f rJ• i �,J.•r.•' i { r •. J {r ... :; M • {� {,::' ; :•:: r ; r . � r' r' 1134 t � { �� .. Mme',. �•,•� r • •Mr.. • r,. {;� :;:,• , • • r • ; � l C3 9) � �;':: •{ f' •'•f f J� ,•{''r l•L J fY: • ,. {'' :•'';•• •�"'`'';' },• �y, �J 4•,• r0 •' •, 11 l:{ ::' {{•.'{ {4•, �}' '' H Y f�i' 1{ { ❖:'' {:' {• {1: {•:Y }'J''..... • J'':'' ' {: f •':�''•r,••'';•r'l;{y! 1 w'� .. .. . . t�; ..•. r.• Y.`' ,' "•r, S� . / - iJ �[ j} r • � r ' . ':':''? :' • • ';;y'' d ". rf 1 •iti :rrr4 f� {•r''i'd,•.••f••i • M • { � '' r, , lfi , : }•: { y:;:;i :l'i : iY•;.S''r 1138 ; d� : .. f � ',• : 1J . ' : r' M 1• }.S r •: f: •: ?;"::' ?{' {r r ':'•.:,};:fir ;�'ti ;:� f %:�.f N •l. ; {.'�''� ` :;: :�' :;:•:• :Y•i'•SMr'' rr MJ�' i {iV':f :'•'• {•i' `'� ❖'J'L': � ` r' �;'r �� N ,P � • fl '• rJ MriYf {:'J l• .,. f f•, �. r •,'rY• y', {,•;�'r �•;• ••, . � ' 3 � � • ti{1 • r, rr '• •'{ J fi''''.' {•'•• :iY'•M:Y fi f rr �fi :''M' , {'•'••. ;.•.,., }.'. rr• f.,.;• i O-7 ' :; :; {:1 r''a • M •'Mr '•' :••L' {': {':''' •:•' M r. • • l •.,•,J.:O;J.•'•'r f :;•i;irr•'•{ { ;, ;:•O p;rrrr;S' fi f ,. " :'� ;'';:•.''J •rJ':{ {M ry'':'} �:•r•. �''ri' i :;•fi {`''Y � { •;f'.•' rfi ry �� ...�{•. fi.•{ r.;fr: ::::f r �%r: r {;::,r•'fN,':� f��j:::{ {f J f f? �f C {•'' {'iMrrJ {• r r' ••', {r:• S•`' . •;.,, r {;• ''' J ri } r.;:'•r.4'•ff,�rrf'r 2 r {•'• • i i 7 '' `'� .'' • • rfr'` r • • { • J r r rr• l - � � {'J ,• •.. ;.' r;, • f r : � {; ::S :: };' }r;fi Mf } ;; {•• frti�M •' ,llllr,.Y:}' ;�M4 P �.', ,. �� � / (� ) � Q ' fif;� �i;' �fM: ?, + . •Sfi � : {� {', P, ' ?' • i•'J,: { {' :' •'•:;i i';; ;;;J'i lr l r•;: ❖:ev.•..; ;:�•' •:�: {v :�:;:;:;.• •• :•' r'•:•.•''.••• r: ��s 'r':Cfr ?r:;?f• �; :;.rrf fi 0 4 040 ..,, r .•••,•, Jr ,�}?{ �,.;.• 3 .•' :P'r,•,• • {: ... .•'r�r�•J}, r { r .•.'�:: • • r•' }� r � {• { r�' , • •Yr •��'�' �' {'•'• ' r J� • •`r r •? �r1. J'r:`'J•r• r { .,{ r.� �l J.• •'• , ..• r r.�'`f r"f� r rr': r �9� Q Z 5 •.;, • r:•'r., �,' r { •; .rr � •rr•; • .�• �'' •'• • f'•': �' ''��• r'•' •'•'�'r • �'�'ff ,rr. rr • } � G • • �• ;'••; • •' ,{ '`� � ;. • � :�r f: l; ;'' :`. l ,''' '.• r { { ; ;f ,,f � }� :i} f � Jl ,ri �{ � �? r: r , : ;J' 'M•••:•••::{ J, : {`:r :'•'•' .:.•,;••,f •.;r •�'rJ'•';h,1',li : vr,',J,;.r• •f � • ': {i'{ { riM� �' �� � • •.i} r J;i :;:;rr.;: l ;� �; f• '. lM.''•. •'•Y.fi ' J'' '• :' •;r •''•'i'i r:•: i fi .ir 'J ,,•� 3' GO ;::;•: {•:M.• • .•r.'.::; r:'r. • .;rtiS•.•..;.; {r d.' r: �' ��:`f;;�'. r:•.;.•' r .. ,. ,.''..;J,. rJ ,rL .•r . 2 ''� . r • • • • • r '1 J • v rr• .•' 'rr • • ,f'' {. .,J'r'',rf'iS ;.• • ;,.•.•, v .••,.•. .::''•. {SYr 7 fr' :•:r+}} . rrrr fir ..r.{?r }}'' } :•: J' • 05 0 5 7�. I - • �•; {.•' •;.• :'' 1 �f •;: r {:•�; fi • • • •O r rf';' • {J Y ',• J• •,.,. •r •; {d {r • frfJ•':• �1 c 1 Z. 5) 433 • :::}r {ti; ::;: :: :' ;.;vI'::•'., ,'�:%�;:� ?r{ f ::':�': f: ` f� . ' • :' f {;C;C; ��r �;.;� { ; ;'; . 7 g . • :•'•'''� r'•: fi r.MP •rr i } { r r'; ;i •..r:. ;•i by�' �,dJr :'•Yrr.,•�M,r•;• • ;'iyy.';•' • ' } i' r ''':fi r' � i •' , , , r • , f ' :;'•;• Y :''r' :{{ • •':l ' } :•Ji'' l�1 rr"''''1 }' • r'�,• J'o,• ; {�r,, •, M f•'•:•: {•'• `',., .;'�y.'ti;J ;; ::;' {:�Yfi'.':�:' ''� ? • : {4 r:'� 'r.•. �: �,.;f r•J : ,M;.; {r,. {;�;::,,•, ,}•�} ::rrJ:•:r r f r r:�•;�' :�;' { f ,,: ;v. , }• • ,:. C l too ti •:•:•::::::rf .:;.• .s;r ,r }yr,'� r ' r +: •.• rr;.{;r,:• ;:; - • .;r •'�.% �;: }:;r. •.s•.r ..'r.:• r: r' • fi .;CS' r , �$;: :;�;�; :; ::•. •f• }• }i :;•fi .•.M..•r:{;:;.: f { {�} , {.;.;.ti rr { : ,.•.. J . r{; � �':•r,..•rti.Y' }.;'•$r{''r.•..•. }s• •r ; r' ,�r..;.;:rr. r .i+' vti tir.. r J r ,., r - 45s . ;,.. ;...---- ., ;5;�;•} •:•r: f•;: �r {: • ••: {'' 1,} fi:`' :l "J :' :••':� :•f'; - ;•'•;:{ {Y ;; :;'J.,• r:`P :{ r "Yf M' :•.{ rY'r { '•' r�r•�'r.• f;ti, al': {•} • , • rJ 'r .} • f r,' {• • .;• ,,• •' {•�r {• S•. • . • ,S J r • .�. •S'fl' • { S^ "• {1, �•'' f ;••' r • D �rl .M.' f.'' :•'•:r'•lrrr ., �{ '':;�� ; • r• f:;V{ f rr.`.r'''fr''�'J .t"iw!'r✓'r '.:•.;.•..•';'•..�• �• r•1r,.� •'r.•' , {{ i 3. �'!' �� . ;•;: r •''' fr'{'; r 1 • • { . rr , , .;';';.M. {:' { ;.; ;L,iM1' Y ;rJ • r• • {• f 1 — . _.. •. r � 'r y : yy, ; ., fi•. • r.Y,•';Y,{� f;;'.•', ?�, .'.''••• .:Jd. ' • y,.;0.1• • �4;r :1 • r'', • J ';'''.' fi ,; { {;i•`: O �qr _ r.��r _... _ �� ice' • S•�;.,•, ^ •�. ^i :' :'''•P : {,, ,Yi �.;. i;:�Yr,M :i} '• • r { • • Aj y�r� ;;; Y �,, f �,�, �� �� rJ i i i . •�i i;i {' i;ii;:;i {:.,• rr MryrJ• r fr:' :• :`:. ••{ y ••} {•;• :;: �� {• ;':':' : :' :•:•r'r'M : rJrr r r r - - - .. - r:' : ; : ti :fi : : {•'• � •. l ,. l r• i{ { : {;i : ,{ 1 • • 1':• :•: "': {:':' ,. J• ,,; `y • r.. • �•,• r• • { 9� f {mil ;:; :; :':;: {f �;: {fi'{•':'•'r:l'',r'f'';:,•r;• �;�'i :;:; {J ;: J :' Y • :fi:':' :� ••. , i i� •� • •• ,�J'� 1 ••.''�. .. f• • ,,,�, J {•Mr1 { ff {rfr . } ;�,' •;•. r• r {•Jr :': ,'' O ,•,,• •''�',.,• • . ;•''' { { { {. �1:;•,,, }•' �J'•Jr,S, } •r •M,•.' f {OM {' }l:•' f - - -- -- - - - �! O - � '`:':::::'::�::'•''':.•'�:; :'r :fi }�: { r {�:; a { ; .: �'.{ :: {::' •::rr:•.M •:r:::{ ;• ; , : 7 �:•r.•.J.� :• :::: {:rr`r: _ { .''•.,. :Vi : }•. 1. • ,`. , . ,;:•: rJ dr •1,;,.. rJr. •;r }:• {'. }Y• : . Pawev Lune •'•: •• •'•••:•:•••• •: {y;:•. {•:•:•:•: ❖' .:•:rr:•:•:•:•:•:l • : :; - :: - - -- •- :-::::::::;:;:::::ti r:.. : :; {::: f �;f:•�{ Dot - � 5 NSP POWER LINES I Ct 86 4.111 ' v �/.59ae i 2.42 ac. 9 c COD 9 cV � a 240 4'► 0 4 N Go ` l . .... 2 4 3a . r 8 in z z C - oo 2(p , •4 U 0 4 . 723', r �,,,, r 'T(32)th 010 W " ( o r r (� W - k t< 1 A W ~ 1174 It 2 J 5(3o) t1� '� , 3027 N — ` Via) 019 ° � ° 3 0 % r • W v_ W c° � h o go 117 . 3013 0 • �� ° 0 512 - LL 0 — — - -- --- — -- — — — — mow.. n• � � (- t 4 13:tj' � � 3007 _ ( 1 , 1 96 .4 ,3 4 1131 ; 2993 *� 44) 1 4 (35, 1 y. J- 3 r . b0 IC ( 1 � � ( "`• C�� a� c 46.30 115.0 114, Q 11 o Q —2991 ... 12� .ge �•� ( 4� ) r 1 et1 — ` (33) H A h 11 &5/o 1/0, 46 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP SITE 3 ATTACHMENT 3 �•. ♦ w _. • .r .� w ..� •.� .• , •.. � ...r, �•►•�i :. re• ,•.�• � /tip ►. M: ••a>♦- •!'1N+ >:i�• r a 1 • 'r ! . ..• �..M.q•, •.. ,Ira. .. + • • q.... P re l l m l nmry Plat • of CANAC�A WOO - :, • d , r „ A~- -0- +...: - - Z- Mot Ar.a•. (00 041111 • .• a . r .. t _ � � • • • {. .{ �, �.•. ". ,.f.. aa.i/5r sf.�4it ��Itr/�/tftl•.e') � /Jl � ✓�s+rt .. • a , .., ' , w ,' a• + . \ • X . '. ' � ��, • + • •^1 /II s•RI � /0,000 /t•• t •. .. a 1 •. .�.,� f l , •.* `x, {.;•.- T 1 ,• 7: • �'..� :! ?i��d �• •' ...�n : �..tt• 1... /R a M •�. •. N.►'•if v•:a JK. J✓i/I�i •' • a� '� t 4' .•�•�• +il� 'jf•'1 �';1 •\ •:1 1 •� ,•• ... I,, •,' .• "'+.a '�•, ,.• } •./i .} fi• •��. , h A.. • rdo+ /AI ON .r �,, j , `r' .,'. . \'t•!�•• .� • •.i• - f •:k ^'... • ... �' '4 + • •.•'•.. S� 1 j`, \•.►.(: • }.e••• - s/ •�. :•� s. ��..,,� ; 'J.'� ,�.+..•� .�M /II blw.�irjr � IVf1 N �/wM �. .•/ •. •J ,`• I ^ ,� .j'• '.•,,+' ^ •� • l '• 1.'"t -.�•�. .' '1 .i, /. •rya- 'a: :. •'♦ ,.•' •,• ^ '• .� �r 1tN 6ofr -P /ilre se -Mw i"Al"eJw Am~; •.. , ✓.� , i t�r� �,.1 N �' .L•. •.• .•►iR•.,!',{• •�� 1 w' - ' �l { �� �l/N LMa �.+��dYll�I w� it I•I/IfII!� If •` L' .�.' l a . { (` % '�' 3 �'.. <.•.�K. t, •t•I. "• dVlYrrwrl�L S//y .f —__ T It X y. ..}!. a f= • .. Fy♦ F:• :rt' .1 't�J . __. ^S`•• .,. t �, +.. , 1 s • iC -er+. j• 1 T w 'ryf . ti i. •' - r ti : t - * •; •�'' '9 .t =;L ' !• i� R ► --c.�- GMMI ri �wY /i ♦ r* t Ivor• live 1%o4- rp%v- • ' , . /•.• Y L. .. M(•. ��y..•'« . 'q .�'f ✓i .ti'.• ►-j ' .j Z � , HEIGHTS - t . 1 < r' Yti� �nA���•`a.•'T�M .ems•' .. Od.Nhs. AMOtA. r:pI �Iw. iilfwl.'� ', • • ,' ,r \ • ' +� tJ t't 1•r, .•; • • t' •' ,7 /,ri••1 ' . ,. _ S . a.• a 1 « �OrYiIy,I !. / /.li or •all.I/Ir1••�I Aatr. // LI 4.0. �IeY/��► .. 1F. J ••.'' • 111 • . ; • .. , •'4,� Y•t. 1 .1 p. • • •C• /� r. J• ra•.,.: rY e. � V• • w�A' V .•• •;- .'' ' � 1 .• , ' .. t .� (:��. w » aAwf •.:.I ~e, APO / r 1 �. �., •'+ �• ' ..• ti •: . � ; �{�, ,A • • . - .7 �•` '. i^ �'�, ,A, •_, / r te,,• ;• • t:. , rJ s'1 A. ¢J : .�. ..� • �.}„ . ;, r , 1 ' » •wi/ /I� J/�'. , IiiRI �/ /If •1 / r l.... rl.r /• •1 • . : ,r.: :wit. �' i i. • , {,! s s .• . r. a ,k,�'�,y.� '.1 " . frje . ; •+:,, ' e . w� •.I� ' /tI• .:. • *" •,`•' • •r w' •, • _ • ,• .' t' : ♦ •� : •�: •• j dI i.i ,w •. • •.r. t +'.Se..•.. t +Y 1 r ui 1 _'!r1'�:rr f : +� 'r�,i:G: C'`•• ll` t ''' �• • � • ` ! , X :%�' •1 _••` -•' , . .. _ / f•./li Ai•e 6•'/ /• '4114 a ; 1 • l •� �� %• ;' w.+1t s r, ..•• .' �1 • t J• T . ,� "'�,;'.. .� .� ,��f•1• 1 . /.•.1t`,�, ,r.. r , 1 �• •. f E ♦ b.•'�. w.r<..�N - g• ,: r•; :� d • •..••.+:�: J►, .. • t • t' A. 1.1't .� .. _ . �-- 4.. r e7�•s' ' f' •1 - • -- ` L ...-r- '�.•'. •• _ �..�„!•��.,, :�. -L�J •1 " . , . , ,r rt h . (,• - - . --- - --_- ROAD t3 ` _ �- _;� ..�..�, ,, , , ' 'COUNTY - c t r �����,� 1 =...•' /:t:`'I�A[- ,a•rl•.• �1. alt ~fan ~ �I , � a . / i-' �',4' 7 • .. �' / �. r . r �� ^ . - _ �y ♦j � : s,,., r.:,,J.. ti ' � I)- -, ••-• -= +-r • - _ - � _ � a'�' r i. t -", ♦ r •• I � ' . w • �i>�, 1 rA '!�''•� � 4a••! : l•\.l(' 7 r � '�• t • � r. •� .+�, /' li6a► •J' II } r„s� j. +•► > [^'�, /•7.;'�Y �i' {!3 M AAA• ... • .Y ' ♦ .a.T• y...' ' li •/•• .� •• ' t \.al .1k` • i• . a r 1i ,•• { O ' ��•' • / l .�• - i �' ! ='-• =r.•. _y, .�;�4r.. .Jt«t•, C:. ': { ' y N' ,,� : •• \ ' / ►,� •? 1. ' �. \ r. -. •. a j -t+-7 1 •' • 1 r, tL._• • �'..* 1..�,� 4 t 7. .► . ` •' • •.. � .'� (� \ � •' . � ., 1� � r � \ �1 � • , f• � I i i � �•"!'�'��I".. �� � t+ t .rrrY •�..., •��'�•�`,� "�� +.�j , • '►.�f . �"� '1•�t �.i. ^-5� c•'aa. � \�� '- ' ` ` t` ,. 1 , a 1 /., 'f �./ {;a I 1 f• v� / N ♦ w ;�'r^ ti•a t ,t• , fie c. i. - c!MII+.t a'!�:t %' •�' �, / / \� � `� •�,: i. ,' v. \, \� �; :�', tk 1 i•. i N• 1 4• ► ' / '�:1: 4 �( � Z K4r�' •t'/. j �• i #^M ` ", . •.i�,3s ' f ' �''4� ✓ '• +: '�• / �� / � ♦ �� ,__ `!•'� t' � •' �•�: * � •.• �1 I ► / IV � 1 ` / ,'tA•Ir�.,t'�'� i• 1. j•+t •. ..f .•.ra �JM•vi•:' •,� a .. -' r }a- �-. " 'I. / �� `'\T���T � • '�"*"T -� ,.. \• 1, 107 i } ]�� t l `{ '� a.' �•.�J•,w %.• �'- � I : I'� :!;'.y .:11, �y.' •It►''+:'•ia• ';...�•:"' .. .M• •�'�.•.% ••` 5 - • 1 • -! � , ..�••� � •r1.•v 4f a '1a - !, •' , f ( I , ♦ 1 w .ly `•'•� '►• ,.•, '' , •Q y ' • ! {''t'r n.f: , 1 •t '' ~ r• /I /J / / � ~~ .I �I t `� \ \ l �..��... -•� � � 1 I a\ 4��, �•'� /' \r ' .1 �,�' 1 ►t, ~ , Y ���. _��.. e,�1M .t'1(:•►' 4 ' •a � � 7.,'' • t • .r /'�•.►.�� �) iL.. ��a 1 11. �� I (I a ./ ' \ 1 1 . \� ` �t l�. 11: r .rr''! % :'^ 1 ► ..,�. �,•./ ,a I �. / ► �: .� t " tom r '1 l t .` � � a t '/! • i • ` t, ',t ••r• .. , / a / / � 1 \ N ` i ` �/ iii i \�\�' \� tai r :.,. : t..,< �_'• �. ) / •/ / } / / Oat \ 1) i ;'`�' .• •{ `l' 1 � •! ; j{ •� `. \�. Y . r'.. �' •�.. .. �'. `. ..� �'. •�• .. • .1. / / � j� ('.Z^ •� \.l( • , {.�� • \ � t� r s \�� �w w..: t F #' ••.. -.. • :I..r.�.: •-w M... a,/ ..tr• /,. 1 1�. 7 / V i)• ' �' 3� \- ' t `\ 1`. 1 1 _ y J/ i'. {i, `'vi• Y^tt . • / / �/ �� . �� 7 /'`{••,� � F k \ ��' 6 . r I� � l � a i � � \ .1 ,�, .�� ` t � � • i. ,•• �� _;r .. .;,•J:. • . '/ . • ,'1 .1' : 4"'}'' i t ' O // / Q : \\ : •� k' _ _ i � wi �� `� /'�j 1 • �. • !: ~' r ' •�' + \ ... / / �� ' l / Sri •�/ �,. .` . \`• ..; +`r r 1 , ' r, {� rr ` ,� _ , �•ti _` ., '�" �0 '/ / i': /r- ``te s'\ . \ 1 \ . •• AI- .,�• �� \ \`�`��� y / 777111 1 . . -• • a• . t • •�a .. lb /i Q ` •• �'J 1 I `•+\.\.�'�`.a j. ....7►y • Z` •r:��.� >ti- .�. • • ' w r +I • ' .- .....`.``.. ... �..; -r• �r - 7rr��r.w i ��� •' •w...T +I A1 {" `• �.,�.i•f.�. ,', `- `\ �•��t \\ • rte` ���,; • •'1 r. • �. a • •. ..• +.! . • v• •.�. a• . ;. q .! . .. t► t / �/ j •� •� / /// / ,/ .+ :• 1 �,�- �l `�` \ � :,\„� .��v \ ..� �\ � • 1 -/�A.r iI r ~ t ..r. .. . ..�,c���n.. - •- f ' -��".• >� —/ �`=� 1 � 1 •r. _, i ,[ �. � a , tl . a •� 1 ' 1 1 r '• : •. ' ., r - / / /�' // .'�� Yi `, - �' �(.± / ?. ^� ! t,� 1 (`� .`�~� /•.' • t`1 ; ,� ( / Iyt _ _ . 1 /t •W �, \ .. , +, // r It 1(t �AI...�ei11••ril. , rl.i;.re •e/K tI�•rr +, J _� Islas t ` E.. ---'-` NSP POWER L I N ES �,� -�-� :' .. '. • _ �' / / 1 l / t t i i' ♦ ' .- r'� _ ..� ,� �r�... npi.// 'I - ��; / / -�� .y • r L 1 A. o • - 1 /`' J / - /•/ /•/�/-/ 1 4 / .L / .�. /. r _.� t _ V ....1 �.::7`:LjJI... �•r :....:..�.�...... ....:.. ....... �- +Ly�,.:.w.. -- t - j •'' •' + t; fi A! -/ Zaa•� _ It , .. ! �, c - •• 11 r I t 3 ; + • I 1 �i • �„' t ( r '. 1 : �• a ♦ • . A ) .. { 't • • I }. a . . i t' .. , f - M1 •, : ' .' -. .0 • :. IN �• . �•••,�+t .►..J•u'{fw . !. }�� J �.n` - .�t��.•�.R -rt, •!•. '+: •1'-..� , �i.i� • '�ctl): , t ♦� `f, 4�t �'. AW. Li t . - rt her" r cs rtity that this plan was ►rarei try r Q tt acid that t s. • duty Rplstered Land wrveye • ssNr the laws of the lists of Ilinrleeets. '1 s'c•:Ie � Q• `\ _Doti! may • W�saen y Mg. !6.6274 1 .w _ 01"low. North Who DMIN01M INe• 11141 Cb*d Ave NE 1111% 6 $99 612 116 1101 Cull Ew KIN Gat Sw"yor. Roy No" ' PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 N 2 , ATTA CHMENT 4 NORTH SUBURBAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. 8. CENTRAL AVENUE N.E. BLAINE, MINNESOTA 55434 786~6000 FAX 780-2746 AUG � Date: August 17, 1994 To: City of Maplewood From: North Suburban Development, Inc. Sub j: Canada Woods East Preliminary Plat The Developer for the subject property requests a time extension to six months from the date of this memo. ' Due to the the winter shut down and the utility design along Co. Rd. D, the project plans are not yet ready to submit with the final plat. � F MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Time Extension PROJECT: Beth Heights Addition DATE: September 20, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endors �....�.,. Red ect ' Chad Lemmons is requesting a time extension for the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat. This plat would create 52 lots on the north side of Linwood Avenue at Sterling Street. (See the maps on pages 3 -5.) Mr. Lemmons is requesting this time extension because he is negotiating with the DNR for a permit to build the Hillwood Drive cul -de -sac. This road would cross a narrow channel connecting two DNR- protected wetlands. The DNR considers this channel part of the wetland. Pilling requires a DNR permit. To reduce filling in the wetland, the developer will drop ots along g the westerly wetland. The developer also may drop a lot to provide a sedimentation basin. Sedimentation basins clean the water before going into a wetland. BACKG June 12, 1989: The City Council approved the Beth Heights preliminary plat subject to nine conditions. June 11, 1990: The Council approved a one -year time extension and revised the June 12, 1989 conditions. June 24, 1991 The Council approved another one -year time extension and again revised the conditions. June 22, 1992: The Council approved a one -year time extension subject to the June 24, 1991 conditions. The Council granted this extension since the plat is dependent on the City completing the Sterling Street construction to Linwood Avenue. August 24, 1992: The City awarded the contract for the Sterling Street improvement project. The contractor started work on this project in the fall of 1992 and finished the project in 1993. September 27, 1993: The City Council approved a one -year time extension and changes to the conditions of approval for the plat. The Council also approved a City Code variation to reduce the required street width from 32 feet to 28 feet. RECOMMENDATION Approve a one -year time extension for the Beth Heights Addition preliminary plat. This shall be subject to the September 27, 1993 conditions of approval. go:b- 8:memo34 -2.mem (12 -28) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat Attachment 1 FM zos • • 17 ... .. %J% %god •t • 1 . CURME CT. 0 2. VALLEY VIEWCT. .�•:::� 3. LAKEWOOD CT. _• f w•r�f� • • • �i .j ' t • M • • • 4 v AL • •v >Wars • CO) '' QD �• •. • ••r s •• • 12 �' b . t M � • V • :1. '4 •� s �. •,. • Il LOCATION MAP 3 16 • HU N • N Cr. . . 2. OAKRWE LA •s _ Attachment 2 C wee VIEW a s _ F O R E t 3 R D. A T b ,�! FOREST •,`o T L o T.' 4 � Zr rn N t Al°�� ' s zos.4 - .+ Z .PART OF COMMON W o ��� 3 .2 VISTA HILLS i M = 3 AREA P omp ♦ • 4 � ' PON 2 W � .4 J . = e , L4 � 6- 4 PARK �, � �� W = ' �' T TOWNHOMES ") s T >, �' CRESTVIEW FORES MbFft / r2! '•' ov i {. • I i t ................ � T 3 IN J 1 r... 1 O i 1 A. e ' �1 4� s S a t m a . 2 � S O U T H 3 N 9 a '7 4 a .......... ..... ............... ................... { I. i t 9 n 9 `l 4) . a 4 8 a• i Z 90.;I CPO 05 90.x' • 0 3CZ»yt•. . �. . 3 LLw 86 90 OZ 0.04 :�►: IL -a i 0 v N �► D D D .o I W c 1 f 4 4 .� �a ( I 3 16 2 4 sz ` : o' 1 8 1 ti 39 I N l R I 2 0 : WA T ... o�I 11-' 43 /03.49 q� 7 $ �sr 3 : 1. 90.0 2 02 1 1 - w :;1 N �• 0 •dV: •:Y .... ..... a •�� r :':•: :•{ >► '• i ,'• ; : {: 60 X G 0 U T LO '1 T 4 1 5 0 ............. 1 D 9 �.o � o r 4 4 &c.- o .7 x. �S 2 1 C 5 T J N C 1• . h a w LZ 3) 4 . N t\ N V J - :•:�F: 0 T t: O� LO T E Z i s `_ = 6' 2 20.2 „ �, •., ..Y . 00 • f•i>• ua •__.+�..- pD LLNWOOD AVENUE Lo zo .by e 6 3 ,r, 4ii p C 1 - r t4` 0 plf` t!id r '[ 2578 �, O:ca. o: h 2616 NN � ' f '1l ' ` �•� . 5 a.c.. ��- -2516 o o +o t Ni OUT LOT o� I Q ( 4 ) 0 To TAI c 64.38.0. 1 , r �V I � I ' O C1�is, 0 o ,4 l z PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 4 N •C) F_ Revise Preliminar Plat of: ' ,a t 9 2 BETH HEIGHTS ADDITION ri1J �.Ift 1 "; pop Sw 4 41- 0 v 250. •100 CHAD I All 14 Act 16 i ts 13 4 0 j ., I TA% I A to 0 AV .000 og 00 � 1 ti `�' ' t�� � � ti� \ t ( �� its rl t x % k Nt J15. 40 R41-1_1 A N 0 .2, • I . - - -, - * ONN L v% --j- ;x-N rj, 49 x: z It . % o. 4 V4' % LEGAL /0 M. .......... .... . .... z All R PROTEC TED- N; Sep 1 11 I t v 40 — l -�-*t,:'WET LAN D'V DNR PROTECTED. 1 WETLAND X 1A W ' St 040 k ., M loq 103 j j s o- V-W zi .00, % 4Q— T 10* .1 10 4:;:5 -\ 41 1 it O Z� I jr 0 OA LANE f 11 /16 1 V1 _ 40 �416 —c t ....... I �,-�ZR! 104 0 "P, if 4 -1--- It r __ I 104 0— '1 A4, 4 .4 % 10 13S 1 7 _7_:� .1 1020 I . lin Xt� �11 I off E6 -Z —1050 V) � Z.7 4 �10 1040 3 110 j0 ?,0 A.. Vvb, 'N.- \%,- it s/ [ z f 1050 V11 %\ C w ) Ij 7 01 -Z it's lilt 11" 1 Ct % It At It 166 ell II I I / - /go' - -0 All, —.01W lb l\` \\\% 1040 `, ,'11 � � \ ,, , 1 -'�\ � '� \ .� �� ~ _ — � � ' — � � ~ � . ' '�� � r�$ - -�� \ 1 1 . /�� III J1 ,7 � \ Ifi�1 . fh 1 1 1 1 1 1040 It __4 LIJ V LN N No ZJ030 1030 z7 Z 41 i z 0 1020-- il� t12 =? - 1 i1i4F 3 /pup P.4pe h'A e Lolo`%_ 1010-;- 4- 6 V-71 tz - � N - 1% -.• — — , uj to % $u— - All U& w e�f 13 46 . 711 o =r i r I 2 7 l0k Cn I 01 NO VO 5 5p U. o o.f ow IP411f , \0 J -S. "-S,,.zr4 /;.,e p Se 12 Developer KENT W. JEFFERSON ( Jefferson Homes) 4530 Hi 61 While Bear Lake. Minnesota 55 110 Tel: 429-5309 North Scale: 1 Inch = 100 Feet I nww Quin "t go wn.,. 0,0% gw-" "Is > + Ww"W" C+ IN #0 Sw* of *wow. ejot-ef— 0 a j.p., ol; e6,r-d, ..roe # -,c.-;jrov I -, -,ip M ,5. q, R LID . i SONY, /A/0, -C'+ LAND SURVEY0919 '.1 W oco • Lev4lbn Aw. Alf. Circl Pint Y Mntsola M014 7,elephont �W-fssc = MEMORANDUM To: Mike McGuire,, City Ma r o From: Bruce K. Anderson Dir s & ecreation on °un�. Subj : Maplewood Park & Rec at ion Job Description Endorse Date: September 20, 1994 Uodified For The September 26, 1994, City Council Meeting Rejecte Dat Introduction The Maplewood City Council requested that the Park and Recreation Commission prepare a job description outlining their qualifications and duties. The Park and Recreation Commission ap- proved the attached job description at their regular scheduled m on meeting Mond S 19. y p Background The j ob description identifies the major responsibilities of the Park and Recreation Commission. The specific responsibilities are identified in the City Code. The job description also identifies the Commission as an Advisory Commission, as opposed to a legal Board. Recommendation I recommend that the City Council adopt the job description as approved by the Park and Recrea- tion Commission. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1830 E COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD MN 55109 MAPLEWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION JOB DESCRIPTION PREREQUISITE - Resident of the Cit of Maplewood 1. Interest in and knowled of Cit of Maplewood, 2e Interest in parks, recreation, and natural resource issues. 3e Willin and dedication to commit time and personal ener to the Maplewood Parks and Recreation Commission activities. 4. Willin to seek input from nei or and individuals to achieve parks and recreation g oals and Commission g oals of the Cit 5a Abilit to maintain an objective approach to issues. 6. Sensitivit towards appropriate use of cit resources, both financial and ph with an understandin of the communit re for continued g rowth, 7e Understand functional role and responsibilities of Parks and Recreation commission. 80 Understand "Advisor status of Commission authorit RESPONSIBILITIES: lo Attend and participate in re monthl meetin and special meetin of the Commission. 2. Participate in appointed stud committees which ma be established to conduct certain affairs of the Commission. 3© To formulate policies on recreation services for approval b the cit council. 4o To advise the council and mana as to the minimum qualifications for the position of director of parks and recreation. 5o To recommend for adoption, standards on land ac facilit development, pro and financial support, 6. To make periodic inventories of recreation and park services that exist or ma be needed and to interpret the needs of the public to the cit council and the director of parks and recreation. 7. To aid in coordinatin the park and recreation services with the pro of other governmental a and or S. To interpret the policies and functions of the park and recreation department to the public. 9© To advise the director in preparation of the annual bud and lon capital improvement program. COMMISSION JOB DESCRIPTION PAGE 2 loo To review, prepare and make a report to the cit council b Januar thirt of each y ear re its activities plan and recommendations for chan which the commission ma deem desirable. 11© Annuall elect officers of the commission. 12. Periodicall attend Cit Council meetin at the re of the Chairperson to present Commission recommendations. 1. Parks and Recreation Director 2* Cit Council 1. Re meetin attendance and participation in Commission activities. 20 Prepare "measurable" g oals and objectives on an annual basis., 3. Evaluate status of Commission g oals/objectives. 4v Report evaluation to Cit Council. 5o Prepare annual report for Council consideration. CONDITION OF WO 1. Three y ear term appointment b Council, 20 No compensation,, F MEMORANDUM Act by eat .1 ; TO: City Ma er g FROM Environmental Health Official Zndoarsed. SUBJECT: House Delliolition and ASSes srllelit 1832 Gervais .Court �� Jfodl `le - . DATE: September 20, 1994 j eate Dat e ,.... BACKGROUND In the past several ears • y , the City has received numerous complaints abandoned house about the e at 1832 . Gervais Court. The complaints is h p ave varied from unsecured d.o ors and windows to vagrants livin g g in the house. Under the state statute on h buildings, orders were issued to the hazardous owner, Mr. Terry Myhre, to demolish the house. When he di• d not comply, a court order r for demolition was ranted. (See attachment g . DISCUSSION .The court order Ives u • g s the authority to demolish the building a a' • g Ild assess the cost which is to be , paid within two years. I have obtained three bids for the demol• • ition and other required work. The ar • Y e• Bjorkman Excavating - $8,450 Ray Anderson & Sons 6,900 Frattalone Excavating - 4, 950 RECOMMENDATION . I recommend we accep the ' p low bid from Frattalone of $4 ,950 and soon as possible. sc hedule the work as COUNCIL ACTION Accept the low bid and a . approve the assessment of the demolition cost. jl \mein \bids s STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMS EY S ECON D JUDICIAL DISTRICT City of Maplewood, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER vs. Court File No. C2 -94 -8557 t Terry L. Myhre and Norwest Bank St. Paul, National Association, Defendants, The above entitled matter came dui o y n for hear' ing before the Honorable John M. Sands on the 2nd day f • y September, 1994, at 11.30 a . at the Ramsey Count Courthouse. Patrick Y rick J. Kelly, Esq. appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff. Robert ' A . Hill appeared on behalf of the Defendants. Based upon ' p n the files, records and proceedings herein the Court makes the ' h following FINDINGS OF FACT 10 That a hazardous building as been ' g n found to exist at 1832 Gervais Avenue, Maplewood, Minnesota; 2.0. That the building at 1832 Gervais Avenue ' ,Maplewood, Minnesota has been broken into and vandalized has debris a inside and is i and trash n.unsanitary condition; 36 That the building at 1832 Gervais ' Avenue is hazardous because of inadequate maintenance, abandonment dilapidation physical damage; P on and 40 That the building at 1832 Gervais Avenue is a hazard to the public health and safety; ORDER 1. Plaintiff's motion for the Abate ' ment Order is granted, and the Order shall be enforced. 1 2. The City shall immediately aze ' � Y the building and all costs shall b e paid by Defendant within 2 years of the date of • Order. this Date.* September 2 19 9 4 . � BY E CO r y , JOHN M. SANDS Judge of District Court 2 Modifi ed, FROM: Assistant City Engineer Re - ecte Y g j �� � Dat e SUBJECT: Project 89 -04 County ty Road C Street and Utili Improvements— Assessment Hearing DATE: September 20 p , 1994 Attached are the ro osed ass • p p assessment roll and the resolution adopting p g the roll. Any appeal forms comp leted by a p affected property owners have be .Clerk. All affected en delivered to the . city cted property owners have been invite • • d to the hearing, where the ill be given the opportunit to resent a Y w Y p an assessment appeals. Please see me with any uestions you q y may have RAM jC Attachments RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required b law, the city Yg q Y Y council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of County Road C Street and Utility Improvements as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 89 -04, and has amended such proposed assessment p p t as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof,. is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special p assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 13 years , the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1995 , and shall bear interest at the rate of 9.0 rcent per annum p from the. date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1994. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement aid for from municipal p p p funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such ro erties make such p p assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which. may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051 to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended don the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. i AGENDA ITEM -- AGENDA REPORT Action by Council Endorsed TO: City Manager 1(odif i e ]te J eoted. FROM: Assistant City Engineer Dat SUBJECT: Project 93 -08, Sterling Street/Schaller Drive Street and Utility Improvements Assessment Hearing DATE: September 20, 1994 Please find included herewith the proposed assessment roll and the resolution adopting said roll. Completed appeal forms have been forwarded to the city clerk's office. Some property owners will also be attending the hearing to present their appeals. Please see me with any questions you may have RAM 1c Attachments RESOLUTION ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required b law, the city Y council has met and heard and passed on all objections to the -proposed assessment for .the construction of Sterling Street/Schaller Drive Improvements as described in the files of the city clerk as Project 93 -08, and has amended such proposed assessment as it deems just, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is attached hereto and made .a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 13 years , the first of the installments to be p a Y able on or after the first Monday in January, 1995 , and shall bear interest at the rate of 9.0 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 1994. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended don the property tax lists of the county, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. ., AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Public- Works Coordinator SUBJECT: .Award of Bid— Rubber -Tired Backhoe DATE: September 21, 1994 The City of Maplewood and the City of Mounds View coordinated in advertising for bids for rubber -tired backhoes. Attached is the tabulation of bids. Based on bids received, staff is recommending that council award the 'bid to Ziegler, Inca for the purchase of one new Caterpillar 446 -6 in the amount of $92,138 after trade of city. owned backhoe. LAL 1c Enclosures e TABULATION OF BIDS Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the officials designated for a bid opening by the City council of Maplewood was convened at 10 a.m., Wednesday, September 21, 1994. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for the purchase of rubber -tired back oes. Present were: Lance Lundsten, Public. Works Coordinator -- Maplewood Judy Chlebeck, Secretary Maplewood Mike Ulrich, Public Works Director -- Mounds View Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, .the following bids were opened and read: See attached tabulation of bids Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the .bids received to the city engineer instructing him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city council meeting of September 26, 1994. . I Meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m. (� l RUBBER -TIRED BACKNOE ONE NEW AND /OR ONE USED SEPTEMBER 21, 1994, 10 A.M. FORD TRADE BIDDER • AFF. BID BOND NEW BASE NET USED BASE TRADE NET LIST DEMO EEO NON Carlson No bid Cashiers Lano Equip. $3,295' $83,900 $5,500 $78,400 No bid No No X X Midwest No bid Yes X X Ziegler (2) 5% EA 5101,738 $9,000. $92 $88 $9,000 (Ford) $79,831 Yes 1 Certified 1 .$106 9 543 Long Lake $9,714" $4,800 $101,743 No bid No No X X 'Only one cashiers check was presented by Lano Equipment for the bid including JCB trade in, no cashiers check relating to the Ford trade in. Cashiers check issued to City of Maplewood on! ; specifications required that the guarantee be issued to both cities. y "Certified check presented by Long Lake was issued only to the City of Maplewood; specifications required that the guarantee be issued to both cities. Lano Equipment and Long Lake Equipment did not provide a machine, for evaluation, as called for in our specifications. Lano Equipment and Long Lake Equipment did not provide a user's list as called for in our specifications. Lano Equipment did not include a description of the repair service availability as called for in our specifications. As called for in our specifications, any of the above omissions are cause for rejection of bid. As you will note, the net cost of a used Caterpillar 446-6 machine as called for is $79;831. As you will note, the net cost of new .Caterpillar 446-6 is $92,738, or a difference of only $12,907. L) i 4 ,�. __� . � ...� a `r � • r RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that the bid of Ziegler, Inc. in the amount of $101,738 minus $9,000 for trade in, for a net bid of $92,738 is the lowest responsible bid for supplying grubber -tired backhoe to the City of Maplewood. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for. and on behalf of the city. AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Action by COLlncil: City Manager c orseA TO*" Y er g Vodif i e FROM: Public Works Coordinator ito jeote Dat SUBJECT: Backhoe Replacement DATE: September 13, 1994 21 1994. After Bids for backhoe replacement will be opened on September , evaluation of the bids, an award of bid advisory will be presented at the September 26 council meeting. k t • Jc LAL I -/ MEMORANDUM Action by Coun TO: City Manager Modif l ed. FROM: Director of Community Development Red ece SUBJECT: Phaien Lake Townhomes Date �- DATE: September 20, 1994 INTRODUCTION On August 8, 1994, the City Council tabled a preliminary plat for the Phalen Lake Townhomes. (See the attached staff report.) At the same meeting, the Council decided to buy this property. The tabling was to give the City time to do environmental studies and title work. The City is still doing this work. The Assistant Manager told me that the City would need until November 14 to complete this work. State law requires that the City act on a preliminary plat within 120 days, unless the developer gives the City a time extension. The 120 -day review period expired on September 9. The Developer gave the City a time extension. RECOMMENDATION Request that the developer give the City a time extension until November 14, 1994 or act on the preliminary plat. (See the attached staff report for a recommendation on the plat.) go/b- 8:p1Wmmem (16) Attachment: July 27, 1994 staff report MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Phalen Lake Townhomes Preliminary Plat South of Frost Avenue and west of English Street K and, J Corporation (Ken Nordling and Jeffrey Schoenwetter) July 27, 1994 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................... ............................... 2 Project Description .............. ............................... 2 BACKGROUND.......................... ............................... 2 DISCUSSION...................... ............................... .... 3 Density....................... 6.0 .................... a ....... 3 Drainage Plan .................. ............................... 3 TreePlan ...................... ............................... 4 ParkLand ..................... ............................... 4 Trail......................... ............................... 4 Streets and Utilities ............. ............................... 4 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... ............................... 5 CITIZEN COMMENTS ..................... ............................... 7 REFERENCEas seen ................... ............................... 10 SITE DESCRIPTION ..*Samoa as seemeasseeeme goes goo goo son 00 0 a as as 10 SURROUNDING LAND USES ...... ............................... 10 PAST ACTIONS —THIS SITE ........ ............................... 10 HOUSING POLICIES ............. ............................... 11 TRAFFIC ..................... ............................... 12 SOILS........................ ............................... 12 INTRODUCTION Project Description The K and J Corporation is requesting that the City Council approve a preliminary plat. The plat would be south of Frost Avenue and west of English Street. (See the maps on pages 14 and 16.) Ken Nordling and Jeffrey Schoenwetter represent the K and J Corporation. The project's name is Phalen Lake Townhomes. This site does not include the 7.5 acres on the corner of Frost. Avenue and English Street. .The owner has no plans for the corner. The City has planned and zoned the corner for commercial use. The plat would include 103 multiple dwellings (87 town homes and 16 double dwellings), Outlot C for park and Outlot B for a drainage pond and common area. The preliminary plat shows a trail to Gloster Park. (See the proposed plat on page 17.) The developer has not decided whether they will build the town houses or sell the lots to someone else. So, they have not submitted building plans. The Community Design Review Board would have to review these plans later. A homeowners' association would own and maintain all the streets, drives, utilities and common areas. BACKGROUND On December 13, 1993, the City Council tabled requests by Good Value Homes for 184 town homes until January 24, 1994. The site was the entire parcel at the southwest corner of English Street and Frost Avenue, including the corner commercial property. The requests included a land use plan change to R-3(H) high density residential. (See the plan on page 18.) The Council tabled this project to allow the developer to review their plans. On January 14, 1994, the property owner (Mr. Schoenwetter) asked for a time extension until February 28, 1994. Good Value Homes had dropped out of the project so Mr. Schoenwetter wanted time to revise the plans. The Council granted a time extension until February 28, 1994. On February 28, 1994, Mr. Schoenwetter submitted a similar plan to the current proposal. The Council denied the project because it was a new plan and the Council wanted new applications. The Council vacated Frank Street between Frost Avenue and the south line of Gloster Park. 2 On June 27, 1994, the City Council approved the following changes: 1. To the City's land use plan map: a. The R -2 (single and double dwellings) classification on the west side of the site became R -3(M) (medium density residential). b. Some of the R -3(M) on the south side of the site became R -2. C. Outlot C changed from R -3(M) to P (park). (See the map on page 15.) 2. To the City's zoning map: a. The R -2 (single and double dwellings) zone on the west side of the site became R -3 (multiple dwellings). b. Some of the R -3 zone on the south side of the site became R -2. (See the map on page 16.) In addition, the Council tabled a request for a 114 -lot preliminary plat for the site. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council table the plat for more information and revised plans (realigned lots, drainage plan, tree plan, etc.) DISCUSSION Density The developer dropped eleven units (to 103 units) from Phase II to meet the City's density requirements. He changed the five -unit building at the southwest comer of the site to a double dwelling. This change creates a buffer of double dwellings between the town houses to the north and the single dwellings to the south. Drainage Plan The developer has not submitted a drainage plan for this project. The City Engineer reviewed a drainage plan for the previous Good Value project. He does not feel that the City needs a new drainage plan for preliminary plat approval. He feels that the drainage will work. The Engineer recommends a final drainage plan before final plat approval. 3 Tree Plan The developer's tree plan identifies the large trees on the site. Large trees (8 -inch or greater in diameter) are scattered throughout the property. There are seven large cottonwoods on the northern part of the property and 12 elms and some box elders in the proposed twin home area. The City's tree ordinance does not require the replacement of box elders, cottonwoods or trees that are less than eight inches in diameter. As part of the Community Design Review process, the developer should show where he will replace the large elm trees. Park Land The parks plan states that the City will consider expanding seven parks, including Gloster Park. The City is using Outlot C and part of Outlot B for soccer fields. Maplewood has a drainage easement over this property but not a park easement. On October 18, 1993, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended that the City buy the property shown as Outlot C on the preliminary plat. On May 16, 1994, the Parks and Recreation Commission reaffirmed this recommendation. The Parks Commission does not plan to buy Outlot B. The City must give credit on the park availability charges if the City requires that a developer dedicate park land..Section 21 -57(c) of City Code states that "Those new housing units to be built in subdivisions which have been platted, and in which have been dedicated acceptable public park land as a part of the plat, shall be given credit to the .extent of land dedicated or cash paid on a pro rata basis." In this case, the value of Outlot C has been diminished. The City has paid for a drainage easement and given the developer density credit for Outlot C. Trail The proposed plan (page 17) shows a trail from the commercial corner to Gloster Park. The developer should make this trail eight - feet -wide with a bituminous surface. The proposed trail would cross the drainage easement to Gloster Park. The developer should extend the trail to Frisbie Avenue over the east one -half of the Frank Street right -of- way. Streets and Utilities The developer is proposing privately -owned streets and utilities. There would be no costs to the City or to the neighbors. The homeowners' association would maintain the streets and utilities. 4 RECOMMENDATION Approve the Phalen Lake Townhomes preliminary plat (received by the City on July 19, 1994). The developer must complete the following conditions before the City Council approves.. the final plat: 1.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, easement, trail, driveway and street plans. These plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District's Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. b. The grading plan shall include proposed building pad elevations and contour information for each home site. c. The street and driveway plans shall show concrete curb and gutter, except the driveways for the individual garages. . d. The tree plan shall show where the developer will remove or save large trees. The City Engineer must approve this plan before grading begins or before the City approves the final plat. The developer shall show any replacement trees on the landscaping plan required for the Community Design Review Board. 2. The City Engineer may require grading on Phase II with Phase I if Phase II grading is needed for Phase I. 3. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all work that is on the approved plans or required by the City. b.* Place temporary orange snow fencing and signs at the grading limits. C. Have NSP install street lights in two locations. These lights shall be on the corner of Frost Avenue and Duluth Street and on the corner of English Street and Summer Avenue. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. d. Construct an eight- foot -wide paved trail from the existing commercial corner to Gloster Park and Frisbie Avenue. The developer shall extend the trail on the site plan to Frisbie Avenue over the east one -half of the Frank Street right -of- way. The developer shall build this trail with the Phase I streets and 5 driveways. This trail shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Engineer. e. Pay the City for the cost of traffic - control and street identification signs.. f. Install "No Parking signs as follows: (1) On one side of streets that are 28- foot -wide. (2) On both sides of streets that are less than 28 feet wide. g. Remove any junk, debris or tires from the site. h.* Provide all easements required by the City. 4. Submit a revised preliminary plat for the approval of the Director of Community Development. The revised plat shall show the following changes: a. Label the north south street Duluth Street and the east west street Summer Avenue. b. Show all lot and block numbers. C. Show Frank Street as vacated. 5. Show the following on the final plat: a. Atwenty- foot -wide walkway for the trail between the existing commercial corner to Gloster Park and Frisbie Avenue, The City Engineer shall approve the exact location of the walkway. b. The existing storm water drainage easement on the west side of the site. 6. Submit home owners' association documents for the director of community development's approval. These documents shall show how the association will maintain the common land. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. *The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading permit or approves the final plat. 2 CITIZEN COMMENTS In 1993, the staff sent surveys to the owners of the 68 properties within 350 feet of the site. This survey requested their opinion of the 184 town houses proposed by Good Value Homes. We did not do a new survey .for the current proposal. Of the seventeen replies, four were for nine were opposed and four had no comment. For 1. We would like to see the property developed. (Gammel - Shoreview) 2. I would like to see more of the four -unit buildings, they have better resale value. (Wothe - 1217 Frost Avenue) 3. It would put to good use an area that has been vacant for many years since the railroad shops moved out. .I would hope that this development might increase the value of my small piece of property which is directly across Frost Avenue from the project, (Comford -Saint Paul) Opposed 1. You've got to be kidding! ! ! Why do we need town homes in such a restricted area. The pollution, the noise and the crime increase. Our animal friends are quiet, clean and fun to have around. I would accept single dwellings. (Schnaith - 1220 Frisbie Avenue) 2. We object to the building of the 14 single - family homes across from our house. My wife and I realize that the development of the property is inevitable, but constructing so much housing in this area doesn't sit well with us. The town house concept is good, (we may want one ourselves), but a buffer zone of trees between Frisbie and the town houses would be acceptable. (Clark - 1230 Frisbie Avenue) 3. I believe this is too many town houses in one small area. You cannot guarantee that these town houses will not be rented, and that is almost always the case. Town houses have a low resale value. At $60,000, the people who buy these are usually first time home buyers and will eventually have to rent before finally reselling. I'm also opposed to the traffic at 176 units -2 cars per unit. That is 352 cars dumping onto Frost Avenue and English can't handle it that close to an intersection. This will also bring down our home value since the average home is $80,000 - we are going backwards with $60,000 homes in the area. (Mackenroth 1246 Frisbie Avenue) rA 46 I don't think the developer knows want they want. If you put in 176 units, that is about 352 autos and all dumping onto English and Frost and for the 14 houses on Frisbie that's 28 cars or more. The City can't control the traffic on this street now what are they going to do when these houses are built? You haven't said what the price range of the houses is. I still don't want to see low housing or rentals but you can't tell me. I'd like to see the land stay the way it is. So I have to say no. (Thompson. - 1254 Frisbie Avenue) S. There are no recreation facilities planned and Gloster Park provides meager play area for the present community. The higher population density is unacceptable. (Miles - 1280 Frisbie Avenue) 6. I object to the changes from R -2 and R-3(M) to R -3 (H). I approve elation of BC. Preferable would be R -1, secondly, R -1 and R -2. The proposal would be an increase of 60 units and potentially 240 (4 per unit) more residents. This is primarily a single- dwelling neighborhood and to add 176 homes (4 persons per family) would add 700 plus more residents and possibly 350 plus students to our schools. In my opinion, that is much too dense for that size property. An eight -unit building is not acceptable. Single is ideal, double would be acceptable (possibly 4 units). Throughout this. area of Maplewood there are many existing town houses and apartment buildings (with vacancies and for sale signs) . Within 4 blocks there are already two trailer parks, one large and one small apartment building. In summary, I prefer R -1, R -2. In any case, do not change R-3(M) to R -3 (H). Eliminate BC. I agree with the vacation of Frank Street and with the design if the vinyl siding is high grade.. (Barrett - 1149 Ripley Avenue) 7.. Too many town houses for that space. With such a nice large space and large trees, a nice opportunity is available to make a nicer more open plan to better utilize this park -like area! (Drexler - 1175 Ripley Avenue) 80 It will reduce my property value. Owner- occupied only. (Moeber - 1199 Ripley Avenue) 9. I am very concerned over the high- density population and traffic problems associated with that density. Would prefer the 116 -unit development. (Benjamin - 1955 English Street) 10. See the letter on page 23 from Susan Broin. Staff also received comments from 32 property owners that own property more than 350 feet from the site. One of these was for the project and 31 were opposed. 8 For I think some kind of development is long overdue. The field has never been maintained; the elms are diseased, it is one big junk and garbage depository, it emanates a stench on windy days (maybe dog excrement); it's a hazard for young children and a temptation to older. In short, use it. (Hill- 1210 Belmont Ln. E.) 1 1 0 =0- 41 1. Deep it as a natural, wild, or open land. This development will result in the loss of wildlife habitat. 2. Make it into a park or keep or buy as open space. 3. Single - family homes would be acceptable. 4. It will create drainage problems. 5. Traffic volume may exceed the capacity of the surroundingi roads and may create problems at the intersection of Frost Avenue and English Street, 6. Town homes tend to be re- rented —the units may become rental units. 7. Opposed to rental property and the problems it produces. Staff response: Each of the proposed town houses would be sold as individual units, not rented. 8. Sewage upgrades and costs may be borne by existing homeowners. Staff response: The City Engineer told me that the existing sanitary sewer in Frisbie Avenue is large enough to handle the sewage from the proposed development. The City would not be improving the sewers or streets because of this project. 9. It will overcrowd the available property. (Too many units in a small area.) 10. The impact of the large number of children generated by the development on schools, play areas and the neighborhood. 11. Decrease in property values. 12. There will be more crime and vandalism. 13. See the letter on page 25 from Berdie /Christiansen (1800 East Shore Drive). 0 REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Area: 17.2 acres for the town house and double dwelling site Existing land use: Undeveloped Property owner: K and 7 Corporation SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Undeveloped 7.5 -acre area on the southwest corner of Frost and English planned and zoned for commercial uses and businesses across Frost Avenue. East: The L +L Hall and a mobile home park across English Street. South: Undeveloped land on the north side of Frisbie Avenue and houses across Frisbie Avenue. The City has approved a preliminary plat for single dwellings on the north side of Frisbie Avenue. West: Gloster Park and a commercial storage yard across the vacated Frank Street right -of- way. PAST ACTIONS —THIS SITE The Burlington Northern Railroad first used this site to repair trains. Whirlpool Corporation later used the buildings for storage. They removed the buildings in about 1980. February 27, 1984: The City Council changed the land use plan and zoning map for this site. Maplewood was planning most of this property for SC (service commercial) with some RM (residential medium density) at Frisbie Avenue and Frank Street. The Council changed the land use plan to RM for most of the lot with some SC at the corner of English Street and Frost Avenue. In addition, the Council changed the zoning from M -2 (heavy manufacturing) to the current zoning. Maplewood made these changes as part of a City -wide zoning and land use plan study. The Council approved the land use and zoning classifications based on a concept plan from the property owner. (See the concept plan on page 19.) This concept plan shows 58- double dwelling units and 88 town homes. This is a total of 146 units (6.2 units per acre). October 12, 1992: The Council approved a land use plan change and the Frisbie Hill preliminary plat. The land use plan change was from RM (residential medium density) to RL (residential low density). This preliminary plat was for fourteen single - dwelling lots on the north side of Frisbie Avenue. The plat's name is Frisbie Hill. (See the preliminary plat on page 18.) 10 October 26 1992: The Council changed the zoning map for the Frisbie Hill preliminary plat. site. This change was from R -2 (single and double dwellings) to R -1 (single dwellings). HOUSING POLICIES The land use plan has eleven general land use goals. Of these, three apply to this proposal. They are: minimize land planned for streets, minimize conflicts between land uses and provide many housing types. The land use plan also has several general development and residential development policies that relate to this project. They are: Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses should not create a negative economic, social or physical impact on adjoining developments. Whenever possible, changes in types of land uses should occur so that similar uses front on the same street or at borders of areas separated by major man -made or natural barriers. - Include a variety of housing types for all types of residents, regardless of age, ethnic, racial, cultural or socioeconomic background. A diversity of housing types should include apartments, town houses, manufactured homes, single - family housing, public- assisted housing and low- to moderate - income housing, and rental and owner - occupied housing. - Protect neighborhoods from encroachment or intrusion of incompatible land uses by adequate buffering and separation. The housing plan also has policies about housing diversity and quality that the City should consider with this development. They are: Promote a variety of housing types, costs and ownership options throughout the City. These are to meet the life -cycle needs of all income levels, those with special needs and nontraditional households. The City will continue to provide dispersed locations for a diversity of housing styles, types and price ranges through its land use plan. The City's long -term stability of its tax base depends upon its ability to attract and keep residents of all ages. To do so, the City must insure that a diverse mix of housing styles is available in each stage of the life cycle of housing needs. 11 TRAFFIC The increased traffic from this project would fall within the County's design standards. Short, Elliot and Hendrickson (SEH), traffic engineers, told us that The Institute of Traffic Engineers projects that town homes generate an average of seven vehicle trips per day. Seven trips per day per unit translates into 721 vehicle trips per day for the proposed 103 town homes. The land use plan shows Frost Avenue as a minor arterial street. It is a four -lane road from Ide Street to Highway 61. The most recent traffic counts by the County showed that Frost Avenue, west of English Street, had 6,450 vehicles per day and. east of English Street it had 7,650 vehicles per day. (I have shown the traffic counts on the map on page 21.) This project would add no more than 400 trips per day on Frost Avenue. The design capacity of Frost Avenue is about 15,000 vehicles per day. The land use plan shows English Street as a major collector street. It is a two -lane road with on- street par king. In addition, the traffic counts showed that English Street south of Frost Avenue had 3,800 vehicles per day. They also showed English Street north of Frost Avenue had 6,000 vehicles per day. This development would add no more than 400 trips per day to English Street. The design capacity of English Street is .about 8,000 vehicles per day. The Frost Avenue /English Street intersection now has a 4 -way stop. The County Traffic Engineer told me that this intersection does not meet the minimum standards for a traffic. control signal system. He said that the County would regularly check the traffic volumes and conditions at the intersection. When the intersection meets the standards for traffic signals, the County would put them in their work program. SOILS The Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District informed us that the soils are generally well- suited for development. A possible high water table during wet seasons may cause problems. go/b- 7:phalen5.mem (16) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Existing Land Use Plan Map 3. Existing Property Line /Zoning Map 4. Revised Preliminary Plat S. 1993 Proposed Preliminary Plat and Site Plan 6. 1984 Concept Site Plan 12 7. Frisbie Hill Preliminary Plat 8. 1991 Traffic Counts 9. Letter from the Maplewood Bowl 10. Letter from Susan Broin 116 Letter from Berdie /Christensen 12, Preliminary Plat stamped July 19, 1994 (separate attachment) 13 ?:III o Y om. Lt CONNOR' C AVL 1�- is I I it OR Dalo!f! 0 CT. ,ti 0 AVE KS AV SEX TANI GERVAIS AVE GERVAIS fm GRANOVIEW AVE I DK %*)tREN AVE iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilli1111111111111111111111lillil111111111,1111111 ow F L. 1 110 Kn COPE L CT. ARK AV K*l -nommos� t� E WING DR. ter Las CO. t RO. LAURIE RD. URST ci LELAND RD• S . AN LAURIE CT. I - - ,. � Q JUNCTION AYE b � e MW CT. � Q c BURKE i wool � �� AV EE . BURKE AVE. I CWW 8 ERS ST 1 0 ,� ElDRIDGE AV Lk ELDR IDCE AVE 3 R sE t; N YE BELMOW AVE. ^ � BELMON I T 44 GO c0i SKILL. Ay SKILL MAN 'Av KILLMAN AV. KENW OOD %40 LA j ai 0-Aw cc @ AN AV. co z cic 1' 1 ,11 1 , �ST � ci �FIO IWOOD AVE. FE NTON � G ,. 0 @ AV 3r L ...... ... . L 235 RIP LE( VF. Round La /F. O Q� 1� 0%, of 6 00* o vlb so SAINT PAUL so PH A e aC LOW t; OPH A ST. PRICE Uj oft ft a 0 O wo, 0 a % oaf 90 4 LO CATION MAP .......... SITE .......... Attachment 2 1 11 N / _ i l e f = JOI*r sr r_ � � it ► '� r �� �I 1 .D sa p.vi E ~ 3 r a R -1 SINGLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL R -2 = SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLINGS R-3(M) = M RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL v 0 0 • N tv suss woummww want L l 4ns jorl I oiioctbr i 1 m8 jc s M C W O CL P = PARK M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING SC = BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL. n .• •'•'•'•'•�••�f� SITE 15 Attachment 3 + 'rte 201 .,, f •: i (f S4 d As • 7 t 1 • - ' X 10 , 1• 1• �� la1J ��� •t , ± � +! t9) &a- Tr . . l 1• 14 i1► If . r . t_ KELLER GOLF COURSE -' 1z w) �►) 14 It so all 37 (to Es. �4.�s:) . 4Z, 4• :. , e �`"� .014 l E LODGE �' so . jk%1. 1. 1!!35 _- �iR :L1 = MAPLEWOOD BOWL s Is bI FLICEK PARK 1' . -0. .-.-� p lOw. 1 44 - - 7 + �- tr; _A n ' K 4 r• • OI+ 1 � ` �. O 1111.f.1►bt V►r�,sM/ - �. t ' i+« +►< 1 ' 120) c.:.. -.� ,ro.,..• »..o 1201 N - < - C� - - - - - - - - - -• -- S b �. - - -- - -- • - - —= FROST AVENU --- FROST w tug i° s itio 11 , , _ ,_ ~ - ;; is as a•► a+ sf IL W r W6 40 z s Q• _.,� , i C , L +L HALL = 22 . '`.�' f �t� , - Z. _ 1_880 = ■ _ _,, :, Ai. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . +6 + R i ► r . - V 0 ■�■�rr■r -- — — 1 ' r ,' f 7 :3 4 4 �,.— .1 , • Qom, �. �� s ' ��'+ SUMMER 1 R2 _ 3 11 s o 1840 • V • 1 1 t w + R s `' �` 94 Z 1 _ -� 1839 1 s � -_ W s 1S Z -4 111- - - � a� -4o � L,,.e... _.,, ., � 1830 - +�� • v � . J 1� Nh 1 829 u w,l � !s • < 13 - -=- •� , m •t •� i821 r - -.- --=�; sly• , IZ ,� a��.0 N �;� e� +� �p 1��11 , �.�, 1824;r so —t y 1 1 ' °° ° 1175 r' '-•- r - . .- . r - ,� • `, o� �: MCI- La- 1c 49 y M ; r' r- r' ` t. o ��� r� v �o,- 1810. -,r; �' NV r� _ 0 SRI P LE AV E. ;Lw..•` � �' �1 °� 4 � N ° N'' N < wevT l ift s' �_ s *" 1 N �' - �! t N o Y *" r 1795 tPtE r-- r,"" __ *. ,�- _ �- - -- - o s to ••�-_ + �+ , � I IAN! �� 1 i u.) Gil �� �) •�� (�) C � � � � � 1 � � �cel . S !O Oro go ►?111 ' hii • 1 • � �t. t 3 � tJ is G,� s s , (� (� > a 3 0c1 1 i c.y; t4 0 t�y l d (►a)� 0 UAL M , " ► +a cam) W = )w 11 _ 4 4 M) o �..�. (37) AW (61 : ► (� • T R -1 SINGLE DWELLINGS BC = BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL R -2 = SINGLE AND DOUBLE DWELLINGS M -1 = LIGHT MANUFACTURING R -3 = MULTIPLE DWELLINGS F = FARM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q N EXISTING ZONING 16 Attachment 4 I ( I � b (` I Preliminary Plati of i 4 - i PHALEN LgKE TPWNHOMES - FROST ,.- r �,� Ci::. ». . •r _ 1 . \ \ ��► •�••i :-fi s� /1 /Lr Vf' -_' '`•, •+/ - •J ;� = j - =�� j =� "��� •, �.•` -. i�..� ''/•'.�� _- ..J.�o -� ,� '' I�- I I = �~ == �\�,r •.�,. lT� ' - �.r �ii� l .� IN;- �.- ,-1M /J..• �r�j,,yr /��/ �.r - S'; V •-- i /�•�i \ •I�. i 11 - �0 { ; i �- 1 / /,/ , 1 / ♦ ! / / / / / �./ • '�7 • �i� • '� �`�� ���� /•�, '� /f` i1 �t It t I{ tU111.1 {,1 "' • K \ \ , _ _ _ . . •` /�; /' // / >/ 1 �i• / !•vt 1 I s I 1 t �' { II 1 / - _ qtr. -1.0 • �i'i ' /' '•' I .' // i' �► \ �"� - ... -�/ ' lilt IV \ 1 . J •• 11 ��+.�._.. // �,�., -• / •.► It I i � ; - I - �: ! • .- � te n, - - -N• �or. !.� .. -• �� ti . • . / /^.*,�\, ' 1 J t ' {1 \. 1 / ��. ,•• .•. ���•., -i• • ' w )+ /,rl'•t,4y / w • , r i �.,, {Y 1 I ± •i �• .' ,r ti Z �' \ ^� �• •,. /�`'�� �, � I•' I ', �/ •Y , ~ .I '/'. `�' ' // ( N 1 1 1 • •v • . .•.�'n ,t.. �t 1 N b ti 1 t1 i •,,:' .. - � � •• :- ' „• ' � T � t .�. •.' :: �. P � I 1 i Ih 11 / - --4- i- •�+ �� _ � SUMM '-^ �, t i ! PHAN 44 WWI;" TONM I011m ,I 1 / t { \ � \1 �,� ��� I 1 ' • li ---•• -1 � J t ♦ / - .:.: 1MAN a 14 t11f11I! 1WMw10.1la •t t l IA t`t\ ty� t .! .... , •. ♦ Ulm TOWNIO.IEi' j � (►111dp ta• TOTAL dulls f /� ,•''- 1 I � I -� � / f '' •� � � �{ WON AVE / 1 '�' • 'f l � 1 '� ' I / ' TaIWPIlIOU3� PLAT>s \ It p fitdwoop \` t ` J III t 21 • 1 '.' :: • G 111 t • � I .x-a-e *- •"� J• -� ` ��.,• > • -. 1 � \ � � �,l11J; fiJ I •\ I � � 7 � 7 r � `•• � ' �..• .�, ' ' r ' � v .� •i.c . ` ♦ f 1 ,11 ' \ I \ a� \ M a1M .� . 1 FOOTPATH-_ __ t \ .. I.. 1. \ { ...: , �-,.• : I L �' '� '�' �i s � `� \ �\ ��' � � � �� fli t .� -W ,.' 1 /� -/ �/ i ; � 1 /..- '' '/ 1 fl ( \ \` \ \1 1 � 1 t : I I t�• \t11 111 / J 1 t 1 ! i �� tI r '� '~•t�'�' If � - // ��. /� 0��/ - 1 It ,•11� ' `t �• i 1 1 ! 1 / �1I111,t �/lf � , l J' i 1 1.1 �� / /��.� I \ 1 / �• / ;: } � � 1 1 ! 1 1 1 \1�1`�. /// ` J � / �� /• 1 ( 1 /� /:' f� �' f 1, 1i.y`/�j,� I 1 \ ! 1 ` ( s /� 7 ♦ ,,,� \ 1 1 - _ / / 14 .. t \�\ !�� ,. IT � // . • "��� 1 ` t t l*' // // / "• .. � .. 1 i 1 .' r/ ,/ I. - 1 ,III. 11 J• 1 1 1 1 { � ♦•�� .'Q1 \ • - _.�' ��� ,' ' • 1 ! \ � � / /• � - � �I / �� � t \,••.�1 �:1�;t: t \ «.. -� \ 1 1 t \ \` \\� .,�- �'_ .3!� =� '?`! =� -�' `t \$1,1` `, \ \`• sr�',�•j��w � •�/ ... • .` � -.- FA SBIE 1 . ':.:' � .. " - ..... � A ( nnttl+lt►ew� o.ts�a•a..11•. tiws.r. DEMOMAW SUMMARY t o I ` I IIIBt. � 1dfK tY� We ' Illn• t M.1�• rr�•r y. •w. C•+wwlw oats tRN>It `. OIInOT • f Y •G _ wrw•w.rrr�� •, 3 v! P S ,I D D/ 7 / O N >' O G t A O? O N L �k@ ».•/: ounos t: t/ w nlwn• wry • ~'~11 .P•r•. w+•Iw AA.r��lw�n p•.ft su.•w•54++. ••w) •:.. Roger A. Anderson & Associates PHALEN LAKE - TOWNHOMES ww1 ...... .. .. _.. RA MM .W•17y1•MIi11111•(1•�)1 r... IyMIw .... -«..- -. •,,,,,, ,.., d Civil Engineering • Land Development MAPLEWOOD, MN. 7415 Way=ata BMMWWd• Suite 107 Mil"apoft. MN 55420 ,. �•�' RA _ hMn•Ia/21sA67110s F..ISI2lsal -yam OWNERS: JMS DEVELOPMENT, INC. PRELIMINARY COlwwttl0r •I• DEVELOPMENT PLAN 0147 a..wls w REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT (103 UNITS) 17 4 N - - r rr rr l /rff y. �J �i, r.r/ SI_.rr. 3...,• �— �.� -- �— — .�� —, I — —�. -� ���. �.� �. �. - mow =i. • ;7.—._7 r o f •••r f .,r. na / „•, •K f I •,s, .•„a .fn/ i I+/, .I,l•. •ri• .I •ts i•„• -•tr r •.. ITI�11,W 1 O FROST AVENUE _— .- ` - it r :.v.._. r.,/ .v r• v R :. e: t , Ilrr / f I I.y. /yI /rllnrr lex vi/E ` MML 95Y� . .... \ -.r _•, / � _ -_•- -� o= - - w • I ,�•'' _-` -�_ • — .- -�`_`. - - • a .r-0UT LOT 1 I � PRamlN 1f PLAT OF- :• : __ - " .� S �..tlr•• I+o �' , �'�} �< �� M,— �r i1•�����, J at t' ►/ � ' • t ' '� _• I - ~ / • O .rNr��(r wi.• e - .� / ► r !• 1 1�_/ / 1 f~'�. PHALEN :: �c - Sao }: �:•. :'� _ ' r : �.1' , • ��� • •� LAKE M .1 Z t ' i .�.' 4. • • i • 7 I TOWNHOMES f:•: TLOT B' II '•:' ;r: OU J • ' •t RK PA. rip1muff 1 7 i❖ i 1 r �OQIS ! I � 6 • ! I r mat {,4 �• I I . ' �F �•• • .( ti e ' t ; ,rc, a / ' s 9 IV uss• lW 'R O •! •,'�,}�: 1 I �!'' -. `i11�L. .' :r�.!• ..+ •jyj. si. �i . =j O U - (`. •• m 1 (,1 ' a• '�� � • • S' L ..I ,.s .• -- - -_ -- � .,Mrr • 1 __ - K� - W t lbw 1 ' ::fi= J ,. :i •- - l• �•:: �, a .s. cl) 1. I •+° • lam :•► :4: :: :: :;; ; '►'�' fi 041119 Rj to r:. .k d d c O. ' s V V / 1 I I ti� ' w - f I :• ''• •:�•'r' :!•'. • etc (. f I .s.« « �. rl� •�';F:'F:::;'- {d fir: ;e .M I I iz / !: :• sit i. � I • • 'r(. r O t \ y / � • • a .1l�.1ln•r� . kx r IV.; A • }•� 7 • lr1l.w JI w•/1 wr 6! _ I \ / • •• .N ` •' ::•': �. y 0 OUTLOT A •�c :: :�:: :•i:, t t I ..� '0 r f!1 a I� Vii:•. y � ~;�' _ .•� o , Z to 00 \ � }., t ! • . � � �:�'• 3 • :�': - : � r •.�.� ti •:•:: • :t: :• : } •.: ! a � ;, • �� : I G } : icy '::: '�7�'' �'' ! r ! q � � � :1 . }�. -.�.' .. /�d M0.{ r. -- _ f •• ! -OUTLOT B* O `!� - Svirsw7tt ~- e a : N - Z aw.lo�►rlv�uN1Y • - �11GA . � . : X. Ak, RES. AREA •� ;.r :4: , X SO > % ?.. Aw ,;;µ �:'`• i /0� \ ; -) ,t 1= I I w• t / r \ ' ilt� , `) • •!V 0� S LAKE / �' Is �1• ea I i i ,•. .: / „ \ '� II ' �', 11` VIII I �''` ' ~ �N "' . 1 I �• / �'•� I ( !M I - • !� J ••., �• mot! I. ` ..,.r,�� �� �. _ ac'` y SCALE IN FEET .' ; . •••- . r- - ��",�-- Wit.,- .;.�1 -r�-., fi --r -� t I rl-� ! -:� r-� r� I r f -� t - i •I•r L f!. �F '1 �� APPROVEQ FRISBEE HILL SGL FAM DEVELOPMENT ��' Ip sJF ''` v, t r. L •rI LO • II +rr1, r • L j! ,' i '•t►?3 . r.S I , 7'r - f 0.1 a. •• ..• t,altl,taln�tnitrattMwat•ttwa[a ! _ Y,, 1, ,`' ► / + +-� . I ' \ --� 1.1 L ^. 7 /w. ` Ne_ ale. i I+..1 rr�y 1 1 I �7 1: `�., Nf.01 -;.1. /�y l , "- ' r t T \ 1 _`- -s ' �� wra.wrea�rtrrectarea.eow,rww �/ •e� • 1 \ — \ ` fff , w a war Mamma nstsaotr s.[u + b �, • •.• ! - . \ * _ ( ' i _ t» 1 _ - _ •!. t�- mom tog Lan ant Sul! At mmaaa!• FRISBEE AVENUE -- �.�� --- �� t i I • R,f 1 t I ; , 1 .� .l � r 1 : a. MIl • Ives f • ' f . N ►s ., �. /ft - Itl!• IM / IN r .. , am s- Ir. r ••a '• Q �'; allr r, '�L�/ F- ; -- i �✓ d' • _ _ _ / =r _' �f,.1'J�- - r i t w.. �-;..,.wr�.a..w W �• y V 1 I If 10 10 t a i ti • ri . ./ twr r s are ti: I j r� / Z ! ..» ,.� ..» ..� ..�. .................. »,w PRIVATEL ,��. LOT AREA Z o s r 4 rs it& Irl a LOT ( ,, (TOWNHOM) - . I :b BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PARTY WALLS - 3 oUVEWMf SE MM Attachment 6 FROST AVE � M� ��� o� 4W) 1 IT 2� !� rn ' f W Cx �,�► nx — 'mil •' `n' � i r - (� 1 Z : ° y - W O n - --- f ► nl : r - -- - --= '5346 /- f" AREA r •.. _ N FRISBIE AVE y 1984 CONCEPT SITE PLAN 19 Q N Attachment 7 o P 6 olaA8Q uluuvld u1.188ui u 3M s ., s c4 51 � �� � • . j v id Avv" h i 3V4 .., 11 M � s DRAINAGE A Ism IM • i • , • ~•,•1 tr1 t 4 ',. `� • 1 1 �I ' •fi � }.r s �• "� ow It IL tap �.,�• =�c ' I' a i. ; ,; , ;�. ti t•' - . - � L ~ { ' I •� •� Its. ••• � •M; ,• .. * �' � � ' !.• �. : ... . �;� \ �• � 1•f 111 �(, .' :- .' ' " • • t + t � . It till fee qv • � • (• NI d.. t r ; J• f `' ' • �+ al t. • •�.t ' 44 — ' ' � '�`� '� � i �,��. � •' DRAINAGE AREA i • REA (WITH OUTLET) • ' (NO OUTLET) Alt 4L 571 • WU� �.t:•�* ice., r . • f •' e 1 1 T W d I u 3I 20 Attachment 8 SKILL z NVE. AV SH I A� LA. -J BELMON E. SKILL MAN AVE. I F ---� o RYAN r),00, ��RVE ST I RYI N ° o O Co L m 11 L � FROST �I AVE. � saso 7650 J' w FE NT N O AVE. ° � u' 0 z � o Q z u� su M MER I AV E. � < � J o ry S D0 � � V) FRISBIE AV E. z w = � m z ND RIP LEY AVE. � w so PH IA F ST. C/-) v Q-100' <e SOPHI A ST. 62� � :D g w PRICE 1991 TRAFFIC COUNTS (XXXX = AVERAGE NUMBER OF VEHICLES PER DAY) 4 N 21 W IL ENTERTAINMENT CENTER • 774 -8787 1955 ENGLISH ST. 40LANESMAPLEWOOD, MN 55109 October 10, 1992 Mr. G e off Olson Maplewood City Hall 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr, Olson: Attachment g OCT 1 As we discussed on the telephone, please advise the members of the City Council that the Maplewood Bowl and Fun Mail has made the following recommendation: We feet it would be in the best interests (if not imperative) for the future survival of our business that the K -J property on the SW corner of Frost and English be developed with the highest density of population possible. We need more bodies! That would suggest that the property be developed in the area of apartment housing or high - traffic commercial business. It is our sincere hope that this recommendation be considered seriously. Thank you. Warmest regards. MAPLE WOOD BOWL, INC. Detaano D. Benjamin resident 22 t =t,_,. _ 1� . t =t T�=�L. D '�'iJl�.�t Jt� LH��1 -� �-�1:� � I t =t 450G Fcx �o '1'14 4h0(a - - - -- ...... - - -- - Susan E& Br oin. 1221 Ripley Avenue Map lewood MN 55109 -4321 August 23, 1993 Kenneth Roberts Associate Planner C ity of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Re: Development Appl.. for Phalen Lake Townhomes Dear M Roberts: 1'.10 . . �ct`a pt_.1 Attachment 10 _ r j 1 AUG b P1eace oonoi this lottor my rooponee to your request_ for my opinion on the above- referenced matter. I am opposed to the development. Listed below are some of my concerns. TA. a f 1..; : tl ci l,. i %j a l l _y , L1 = Q Y G Z CA y c i tli t d: .'- -- :a. �' �' '.' L3. * per day is 109 With the addition of 176 townhomes and 14 single family homes to the neighborhood, the number of cars travelling on loca1 roads would increase by 1900 daily. These additional cars may compromise our safety, and increase noise in the neighborhood. Density: Although Y have not had an opportunity to review any plat maps, I believe that the average number of homes per acre in our neighborhood is somewhere between 3 and 3.5. The developers are seeking a land use plan change from it's current designation of R2, R3 and BC, to R3 (H) which is a residential high density plark. The proposal indicates that there would be an average of 7.5 units per acre. This is double the current density standard for the neighborhood. Sewer /Drainage : Will any additions be requ and, if so, will the cost be assessed to the local homeowners, or to the developer? Rental of Townhomos i As proposed, the development does not prohi townhome owner• g from renting out their townhomes to others Might this development ultimately consist of nothing but rental units? 23 1 0 4 5 06 1-1: 018 T! IDD -11AG Lk-ki Kenneth Roberts Au 23, 1993 Pa Two C C'O I would like to see the Cit of Maplewood purchase this propert and declare it an open s I unaerstana tnat -the cit Currentl lacks ade funds to ac the propert In m opinion, this vetQetziL px:upf&..uL provides a nice transition fr "old downtown Maplewood" to the surroundin residential area* Thank y ou for g ivin g me the opportunit to respond to the proposed development* Sincerel Susan -,E. Broin SEB/jak 24 Attachment 11 SEP September 27, 1993 Maplewood Planning Comission Maplewood City Hall 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Commission Members: We would like to express our opposition to the proposed zoning and land use changes to the property between Frost and Frisbee west of English. The property and neighborhood simply cannot support 184 townhomes. That many residences in that space creates a substandard residential environment with resulting decline in property values for all surrounding residences. The resulting traffic and pressure on schools and police negatively impacts. the neighborhood. Gains in city property tax revenue from the project would be offset by property value declines in the surrounding area. The current zoning and land use plan represents a balanced, rational, and appropriate use for this property. The mix of commercial, medium, and low density housing provides a g ath to row the P neighborhood and increase property values. The Commission should recommend that the current, well conceived plan be maintained. If any changes are made to the existing plan it should be to convert the area to open space rather than to multiple dwelling. Sincerely, raig Berdie Sharon Christensen 1800 East Shore Drive Maplewood, MN 55109 25 MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION 1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA JUNE 6 1994 I. CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Commissioner. Roger. 'tzberger Commissioner Lester ahl Commissioner Lorraine " cher Commissioner Jack Frost Commissioner Gary Gerke Commissioner Kevin Kittridg Commissioner Mary Martin Conunissioner Gary Pearson Commissioner William Rossbac Commissioner Marvin Sigmun III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. May 16, 1994 Commissioner Martin Commissioner P Present Present Present Present Present Present Present Present approval of the minutes of May 16, 1994 as submitted. seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Kittridge, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach Abstentions -- Sigmundik The motion uAssed. N. APPROVAL OVAGENDA Commissioner Sigmundik moved approval of the agenda as submitted. issj*finer Martin seconded Ayes - -all The motion passed. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Phalen Lake Townhomes: Land Use Plan Changes, Zoning Map Changes, Preliminary Plat (Section 16) Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. Roger Anderson, engineer for the applicant, gave a ,presentation. Mr. Anderson said they are interested in keeping the options for road access open in case a Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 6-6-94 compatible commercial use is found to abut the residential area. He said they will attempt . to save as many of the large cottonwood trees on the property as possible, even though they are not protected trees in the tree ordinance. Chairperson Axdahl opened the public hearing. Craig Berdie, 1800 East Shore Drive, Carl. Grill and Chris Miles, 1280 Frsbie Avenue, Mark Pallich, 1.149 Ripley Avenue, and Susan Brine, 1221 Ripley Avenue, spoke in opposition to this proposal. Conunissioner Rossbach commented that, even though the land use and zoning plan changes are being considered by the Commission, he is not comfortable reviewing the preliminary plat submitted by the applicant, since it does not include the actual building locations, a tree plan, or a drainage plan. Since there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan on the west side of the site•from R -2 (single and double dwellings) to R -3(M) (residential medium density) and P (park). The south side of the site would change from R-3(M) to R -2. These changes are for the following reasons: 1. They would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals and objectives. 2. Changing the R -3(M) to R -2 would provide a transition zone between the R- 3(M) to the north and the proposed single dwellings to the south. 3. On the west side of the site, the City does not need the R -2 strip for a buffer because it abuts a commercial use, drainage pond and park. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - -all The motion passed. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend: B. Adoption of the resolution which changes the zoning on the west side of the site from R -2 (single and double dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings). The south side of the site would change from R -3 to R -2, as delineated on the proposed zoning map (preliminary development plan 9147 dated May 31, 1994) as shown on page 20 of the staff report dated June 1, 19940 Commissioner Frost seconded Ayes - -all The motion passed. Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend: Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 6 -6 -94 C. Approval of the Phalen Lake Townhomes preliminary plat (received by the City on May 31, 1994). The developer must complete the following conditions before the City Council approves the final plat: 1. Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control, tree, easement, driveway and street plans. These plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District's Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. b. The grading plan shall include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. c. The street and driveway plans shall show concrete curb and gutter, except the driveways for the individual garages. d.. The tree plan shall show all existing large trees and the large trees that the developer plans to remove. The Director of Community Development must approve this plan before grading begins or before the City approves the final plat. 2. The City Engineer may require grading on Phase II with Phase I if Phase II grading is needed for Phase I. 3. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all work that is on the approved plans or required by the City. b. Place temporary orange snow fencing and signs at the grading limits. C. Have NSP install street lights in two locations. These lights shall be on the corner of Frost Avenue and Duluth Street and on the corner of English Street and Summer Avenue. The exact location and type of lights shall be subject to the City Engineers approval. d. Construct an eight - foot -wide paved trail from the existing commercial corner to Gloster Park and Frisbie Avenue. The developer shall extend the trail on the site plan to Frisbie Avenue over the east one -half of the Frank Street right -of -way. The developer shall build this trail with the Phase I streets and driveways. This trail shall be subject - to the approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation and the City Engineer. e. Pay the City for the cost of street signs. Planning Commission -4- Minutes of 6 -b -94 E Install "No parking" signs as follows: (1) On one side of streets that are 28 feet wide (2) On both sides of streets that are less than 28 feet wide g. Remove any junk, debris or tires from the site. h. Provide all easements required by the City. 4. Submit a revised pre liminazy plat for the approval of the Director of Community Development. The revised plat shall show the following changes: a. Label the common open space as Outlot B. b. Reduce the length of Outlot D from 286 feet to 240 feet and increase the width from 149 feet to 150 feet. Dedicate Outlot D as park and remove the park dedication label on Outlot C. Drop Outlots C and B and incorporate them into the new Outlot B (the common open space). c. Move the town houses one foot to the east. d. Reduce the number of units to 103. Reconfigure the remaining units to save as .many large trees as possible. e. Change the five -unit building at the southwest corner of the site to a double dwelling. f. Increase the size of the double- dwelling lots to meet the Cites maximum lot coverage requirement of 30% of the lot area. g. Provide at least eighteen feet for each of the driveways to the individual units. h. Label the north south street Duluth Street and the east west street Summer Avenue. i. Show lot and block numbers. S. Submit homeowners' association documents for the Director of Community Development's approval. These documents shall show how the association will maintain the common land. If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat. Commissioner Pearson seconded Planning Commission -5- Mmutes of 6 -6 -94 Commissioner Kittridge stated he would be voting no because he does not feel enough information has been submitted for the preliminary plat. Commissioner Martin concurred. The Commission voted as follows: Ayes -- Fischer, Pearson Nays-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Frost, Gerke, Martin, Pearson, Rossbach, Sigmundik The motion failed. Commissioner Rossbach moved to table the Phalen Lake Townhomes preliminary plat for more information and revised plans (realigned lots, drainage plan, tree plan, etc.) . Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes - -all The motion passed. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Home Occupation License: 1652 Lakewood Dr. (Kimball) (Section 24 - 29) Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and. answered questions from the Commission. / Shannon "all was present at the meeting�d explained his request for a home occupation licA�ise. There were no comments om the public. Conunissioner Ro bach said he is conce ed with engine degreasing and disposal on Mr. Kimball's prop . Mr. Kimball res onded that he uses a biodegradable cleaning product to degrease e engines and en pumps the filtered wash water into his backyard flower garde . Mr. Rossb h suggested he bring in the cleaner for staff to view the contents listed n the la J., Commissioner Fischer mov e Planning Commission recommend approval of a home occupation license for hannon Kimball at 1652 Lakewood Drive. This license is to clean vehicles and b ts, object to the following conditions: 1. Mr. Kimball 7 may ollow the 't�s home occupation licensing requirements. He must renew nse annuall as required by code. 2. The busines nly operate M o - day through Saturday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. 3. Mr. Kimball shall not clean the customers' vehicles or boats outside. 4. There shall be a 2A -10BC wall- mounted fire extinguisher in the garage. MEMORANDUM TO.: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Commercial Setback Ordinance DATE: September 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorsed Modif ,. ... Rej e o t e d...�....�....�,,.,, Date On September 12, 1994, the Council gave first reading to the proposed commercial setback ordinance. (Please see the attached August 4, 1994 memo for the ordinance and background information.) The City Council asked staff to review all properties that the proposed commercial setback ordinance might affect. DISCUSSION I have already discussed the property at 2836 white Bear Avenue in the August 4, 1994 staff report. I found three other residential properties that this ordinance might affect. (See the maps on pages 2 -10. There is a location, property line and land use map for each site.) The three properties are 2500 white Bear Avenue, 2075 County Road D and 1700 County Road D. The City has zoned these properties for residential use, and there are homes on each lot. However, the City has planned them for commercial uses on the land use plan. In addition, they are next to undeveloped commercial land or commercial property with room for expansion. The proposed ordinance should not cause any problems for these three properties. The property at 2500 White Bear Avenue has one house near the center of the lot. However, this property is not one of the best kept residential properties in Maplewood. The staff expects that the owner will eventually develop this property with a commercial use. This is because it is on white Bear Avenue and has commercial uses on three sides. The existing houses at 2075 and 1700 County Road D already have a large setback and screening from the neighboring commercial property. Having a commercial building that would be 20 feet away from the residential property line would not affect these two properties. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the proposed commercial setback ordinance. go/b- ftsetback.mem Attachments: 1. Study Area Maps Z. August 4, 1994 memo Attachment 1 Pages 2 - 10 AVE' BEMA � 4' AVE. 19 � 19 MAPLE VIEW AVE %•: r. d COUNTY � w NORTH SAINT COURT Sn W KOHLWW � S ti . EDGEHILL R0. '• v OEaIONT � AVE. •' BROOKS AVE. t; BROOKS G �����::• , EL AVE 50f TANT A VE. � � _ may � � �1 Ire GERVAIS � CERWi15 CQNNS AVE. CRIINOVIEW AVE. � CT. VIKING OR. Y CASR.E AVE D MEN AVE Q K �c ���. =.� �'�. cwsrtE EVE. Iff 11 AVE COPE AVE. � �, t; � �r VF. � v t; � � AVE t; � � LAURIE ' � RD. RD. r a�.rw.t LAURIE � RD W u t; 0 1700 � URSf � AVE o W c c� t � � � CO. R0. � B 11 00 @ U AVE o � � BURKE AVE � ��G`j` •� � Cr r AVE. J GYM prw O � t , !!E-CR&4 L CF Md ROSEWOOD AVE. N. ROS D RMISEY COUNTY ~ •'. IW IN. AVE S. � NV NR CRO 0� : NORTH IV LOCATION MAP 4 N 2 {!/ ",• + � . .... .al _a _ 112 N= v C � • 4 °M' ' , - — - - - •+� -:• 3- Z 1 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 5 3 '� •i Q GO n � Odc..2o _ z0 N ( r. 7 1 i . t :. ,., 2 23.2 5$Q 6 27 28 29 30 W I6 17 I8 19 20 21 24 25 6 27 28 � v :•... ,... .,1 0 4 •..• t VA GATE D - AVE. Dx?OG 25 43 3w 1 � J A 3 0 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 5 4 3 W a � a N W MOGRENS ! 16 17 18 19 20 21 2223 4 5 26 7 28 tv m W 40 Z 5( E, DEMONT L/4.33 � _. • o 12 83 ct.t� C} o o 311 Zc �:•. . ..... (7 /�� • • : :Y: :• :•: • 1T� *.-.* . i ::f_:::::.....:. •• 200:...::. :::��::. ::�: . 9 $> Mh Or) :•: :' •:•:•:•: %:S �%:. � ti; :•:.':•:• ::•:•:• :•:•:•:• :•::::; :tip ;iL : 3 I o 1 4.7 to Coco. y S 2480 o 1 ■ DENTAL OFFICE 0 . I n c) . 3 35.` - f .8 !� ■ •g-j%moom oa 181357 - E3 41 MT• x. � . C•F•14 a A� • 1 S c ; 22t 3 m� 1 2462 0 o ��o� 35 .G 9 s � 8 a� . 5 , 4�C, • CHURCH 3ro �� ■. 1,�� . � � 120 35 2425 0 � \ �SG F PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 3 Q. N IVI 1 1 • 4 •. , iar cnllArtrir 1 1 ,• . 1 . eria N60V .� _ "' Highway 36 -IJ � C � V � C ` V C V E Q L ca m ONO in U w, • ti i a R -`t ' Casty LOOP j �ii t r 1 _. R_ (H) i E .1 .� t � U I age 1 LAND USE MAP 4 mm Q N FM � WHITE BAR LAKE WON IL 0 40 COUNTY ROAD �� o CAtl AVE. WOOOLYNt p WOODIYNN S AVE. � 0O c /R �-'� REktVER AVE < AVE. � t o 2 W a acn o AVE. � LYDU a a—. cc z �ui 0 cr. 3t -06k now% MOD 49 STANDRIOGE W �• �4� � z r MAPLE Q AL' CA AvE. BEAM ►�i� � �vE. ILI MAPLE VIEW AVE. RADATL ` $ AVE. • :• AV is � � f . ; •. w NORTH SAINT PAUL COlLwry �n w KOHLWW AVE • 1" C o EOGEHILI. R0. T AVE. KS � row pw* 40 CERVIUS os J J GERVMS AVE �•, V� LOCATION MAP 5 Q N • I � t O 1 at � . �• T 1' 694 3 it ,. in i •o B CIO Z a> a % 4 tvjv� � PERKINS w ,_ _ •- V .p 440 1.48sc. 02 o to 2 3.47 a DAY t A 02 v 0 0 ►� i -sic � 50 2� PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 101 Q. N Z. ic. 80 ol ( F 7) MQ nLt N Ot4C r i WA •t. .- ■ Q. N L VM 0 - A'W MM 11 Lin a all ? 1-. PAJ a i 1 n11 � jw 7�• DlX'o—lk�Tv .. ° vp a c Cc M 6l 3HTS woo o o 0 *0 0 0 00 • • •� •�.••• • �• • •� • •• awI , • •1� • •••••♦ 1 • �• • 00 .0 • • •♦ • •. 0 • ••, • • • ♦ - • • •• ♦• • • ; • •• •. •r • • • Z • • • •� • •� •. • •• ' • . • p •• • S•: •iI� • , i I •• • ••• C RD. O 1. SUMMIT CT. . ••.• •S i:�. •i. 6 cp ����������� : iii •• ':� ti•••'• {• 3 t G7 f z. courrrrmnLw cIR. r � 0 W c� t. LYDIA 5T� �n D � S Y q 0 BEAM �i o 19 BEAM � �vE. e�w ►+�iX� to RADA ri ae O � � 1� yC5yN1 Ay • % W Moold COUNTY COUNT v v KOMIAM1 AVE � �i � C� W KOHl1dM1 z 10 AVE IK R0110 � C � � W O � � ••'' . AVE (3 @ likk � f � (3 DEhfONT � AVE. �E.HH.L R0. r..: I GERVNS AVE. LOCATION MAP 4 N J W BROOK AVE. • B ROOKS 6ROOKS - * •• • .. AVE. - fl •• • SEX TANT AVE. z � s« ar a .i�" A . . . ' • >__ GERV�vs v GERVNS GERVAIS AVE. •• GRANDVIEW AVE. Z CT. •. .. IL VIKING DR. W Y • cisn..E LOCATION MAP 4 N G O u M 6 ` 4 .o me inrl ROAD � • 1 1 WW ........ M 1 1 33 - 4 - -- �� it _ __- •1 - __- - f 11 f / 1 _ � , 1 IN 19 20 T 17 . 12 / -___ -_� i-- _.....� 1 8Q 16116, 1 • 1 :: - -. - -- 1700_; • 1 .1i �,- -� b 1 _ - - ,�- _ i 1 Ws TrsnfWvl ++l n Line !'Srnf. 1 -r- Q�*F - --d --d --� —�-q --4 --- �--� -4 ---� --4 --d --d ---- Q---�4 --� -- 4- ---4 —a ----4 Wa ' ' ------ -• - -- ' • +b� rs 30 7 �' �( :I _—aL -- In 2>! I 24 13 In 21 Ili W _ l0 17 1, , 35 Q 32 5 ---- - +�- - -- 1 i - ---- 3 -- --- - oc Z/ W _ 13 r - -- _ - - - - -- j�l 2) 14 L . -_ - - ' h i wpimmmmm was to ; ' � 405 It O 8.87 a•1.. 1 ON o >,� 1 N- 0 BIRCH RUN STATION 0Z � LOT-7. BL K -1 0 / r'►. /� z. JLG . B W •�• w r. ' I 't' ~J (3/ 91 1. ,zL- R ST. JOHN'S HOSPITAL ' PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 9 Q N Interchange interchange rprincipat arterial 694 1 ais Heig OS R�-3 BC - � G.QIIQc1 or k ......... � � '•'�'�'•�':�•�'':' :• :•:ti':ti:: •.04;.;.•.4• :.;.S4,y :• •• :•.•..•..�' , major collector •:. • ti.• :. •• BC :;:.:•:::.:•::::::::�:•••:: cv :::::::::: :•:;:r;;;;�;:;�; °;�::::::s : :.•. •.— '� - � � � � � � � � � •• ��•'�' ��' ��'�: '�•,•,•, ter,• M ��t E w oo O .L i tj .0 BC so Jag M Ave- -- f i $ '• BC M L ( ' BC( m) R -21: 1 BBC R -y �Q r M 1 . 0 VI () R�3(H) Q Q R-*- 1 C fate C filar coIIec1dr. II t r WIL w - _ I ' i BC ._ - �- 1 � OS Os - -- -$Cs II j • BC R•3(N) �B �E ns . ' P � M r orator collector 1 4�p C tnaw Mn =a WWWWWWWO • �1 r r r r« ,. 1 h N� it � I I� N ► ! -1 _. L BC I M , 1 . ' �- • in er ha g e cn c0 LAND USE MAP 10 Q N Attachment 2 Pages 11 — 17 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Commercial Setback Ordinance DATE: August 4, 1994 INTRODUCTION Request Cliff Snyder is requesting that the City Council change a City setback requirement. Mr. Snyder represents CMD Properties. This change would reduce the setback between commercial uses .and residences that the City is planning for commercial use. The Code requires at least fifty y feet between a commercial use and . a "property that is used or shown on the City's land use plan for residential use." Mr. Synder is requesting that the City drop the words "that is used or". The fifty -foot setback would then only apply to ro erties that the City shows on its land use' for p p Y p residential use. Reason for the Request Mr. Snyder is proposing to build a Batteries Plus store at the northeast corner of White Bear Avenue and Radatz Avenue. (See the maps on pages 3 -5.) The building would be 35 feet from the north lot line. The Code requires a 50 -foot setback because a house is on the lot to the north. The City has zoned the lot to the north R -1 (single dwelling residential). However, the City shows this lot for LBC (limited business commercial) use on the land use plan. The proposed Code change would allow him to build this building as shown on page 5. BACKGROUND On May 16, 1994, the Planning Commission listed a series of recommendations as part of their commercial property study. One of their recommendations would change the definition of residential lot line. The definition in the zoning code for residential lot line is any property with a residential building on it or any property that the City is planning for residential use on its land use plan. The Code uses this definition for setback requirements. The Commission recommended that this definition only include property that the City is planniniz for residential use. On May 24, 1994, the Community Design Review Board agreed with the Planning. Commission's recommendation. 11 DISCUSSION The Planning Commission and CDRB have already recommended this change as part of the commercial property study. They felt that the City should not require afifty -foot or more permanent setback for a commercial building that would be next to a temporary residential use. The Code still requires at least a 20- foot -wide landscaped yard. between commercial uses and existing residential uses. The City can use this yard to require additional landscaping or fencing to screen a commercial use from an adjacent residential use. This screening would protect the residence until it eventually redevelops as a commercial use. RECOMMENDATION Approve the ordinance on page 6. go \b- 7:batplus3..mem (5.1 setbacks to R -1) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. Ordinance 12 No wif P&A ANDVIrW 'IKIN3 3= Lp�•!! - AV 1 1- AV �r 36 LOCATION MAP 13 Attachment 1 4 now WH/ TE BEAR LAKE 68 ( 1) •RENw000 CURVE AV W55"/ AV! 1 NORTH SA /N T PAUL 4 N Attachment 2 t •'fir 68 p a s ` ........ e c •. �i �.x_ •0000 -- •0000- 0000 - • 'Sir• Now ;" Af so• $ P. 1 2 6 S OAS 4 eA LT- i BEAN! AVENUE O it i..: • • S ` ak ;�; -• 1pf...6URGER KING s .. -'.��` • C �Sb� M • �I� I. 64 vic 078 7.Lt 95 _ PREMIER BANK goo •• so o 120) •144 ° RAPID OIL 6 .39 i = m Lc. c ' L too* sop' 100'r too* 140' tto• goo' �• �. es' ` •�,. fiac. .9s &C• . &C. I h f . t .dt �► at. p) is o ( 2810 1976' 1984 24 a► z 2811 C0 01 0 1590 oz0 oto W � + 52 20j S2 S� _ Z o) 3 Lu t a o �4t ,_..�•. � av X28} (29 (301 (4rJ ' o ` �:_ ____________ a 4 00 L �4j.t) O�'1�w C•ff4.so) z _. - - • pap 130 40 50 --- ..------ on, — aim, - - -- on, 00-- 0000 ( C t4l1 Jt to .4'sl o � i s � • i �• �. s � � i ` � .11 f A K E D G E P K\ owl 0000 — 00 40 — � OUT o - 701 79 .• L) 0000 - - 0000- - 0 (-40i ) 1. 0 _ac. �� 400 0 .GSac. •GSat. .4� •90 Zc. 4 . 3e ��. W 1979 _, 1385 -1995 , 2= (2� e o 0 ^� (13) 90 28 a N , • s o ti. 090 coo .4 Sic. ` - • a � Asa • Sao' ioo• Sr 5 s' MOD 1 30 • ■ MATZ AVENUE C .. i st ;, OSA `L. a , - - -- PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 14 Q N Attachment 3 a WIMPS Et G R A6 � ' • � � �-- p MpsT • to :� NGI 6 i +• � ° ���' .1 7 z brr, :: , f 1 i• ) sea V% • :k a" Now NOON • b. • 1 I 5U M tZA tea TZ.- �4 vf, 6W �- _ SITE PLAN 'Q 15 N ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENT BETWEEN A COMMERCIAL USE AND A RESIDENCE PLANNED FOR COMMERCIAL USE The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: (Additions are underlined and deletions are crossed out.) SECTION 1. This section changes Section 36-6 as follows: Section 36-6. Definitions. Residential lot line: The lot line of any property ' JY �egeb- that the City is planning for residential use on its land use plan. SECTION 2 This section adds a new subsection (fl to Section 36-27 (Landscaping and screening) as follows: C The City may require screening between differing -Wes of land use, such as between commercial and . residential uses or between multiple and sin rle dwellings. SECTION 3. This section changes Section 3&28(c)(6) as follows: Section 36- 28(c)(6). (6) Construct all buildings, except single- and two - family homes, with the following minimum setbacks: a. Thirty (30) feet from a street right -of -way \ b. Fifty (50) feet from a residential lot line. V4.0 L .This setback shall be increased up &jT to seventy -five (75) feet based on the more restrictive of the following requirements: 1. Building height: The building setbacks shall be increased two (2) feet for each one foot that the building exceeds twenty -five (25) feet in height. 16 2. Exterior wall area: Where an exterior wall faces a residential lot line the wall setback . shall . be _increased five (5) feet for each one thousand (1,000) feet, or part thereof, in excess of two thousand (2,000) square feet. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect after the City publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 19940 17 Pianning Commission Minutes of 8 -15 -94 -Z- V. NEW BUSINESS A. Street Vacation: Beebe, Road (Section 14) Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered questions from the Commission. \ / Commissioner Martin mo the Planning Commission recommend approval of the resolution which vacat th 1973 road easement for Beebe Road. The City should vacate this easement r the Uowmz reasons: 1. It is in the p ' interest. 2. The City do not need this asement. 3. The street not centered on e easement. 4. A new e ement was dedicate ir 1988. The devel er shall record this resol don with the final plat. Co 'sinner Pearson seconded Ayes - -all The orlon passed. B. Commercial Setback Ordinance Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered questions from the Commission. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the . ordinance which changes the setback requirement between a commercial use and a residence planned for commercial use. Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - -all The motion passed. VI. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS Chair Axdahl thanked Roger Anitzberger for his service on the Planning Commission, particularly for serving an additional fourteen months after submitting his resignation. weir MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Environmental Health .Officer SUBJECT: Outside Storage Ordinance DATE: September 19, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by C ounc i l : Endorse Modified..... Rej ecte Date Two residents have complained about their neighbors. One of the complaints is about a neighbor who keeps. miscellaneous items, such as household furniture, equipment I parts and appliances in his yard. The other complaint is about a neighbor who stores bags. of cans along the side of his garage. The City does not have an ordinance that covers this. I have drafted an ordinance about outside storage. BACKGROUND On September 12, 1994, the City Council tabled second reading of this ordinance. The Council requested that staff meet with Councilmember Rossbach to clarify the language. I met with Councilmember Rossbach on September 19. We agreed on the language in the attached ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached ordinance. go/b-7: nuisance. mem (5.6) attachment: ordinance ORDINANCE NUMBER AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING OUTSIDE STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR GOODS The Maplewood City Council approves the following change to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: SECTION 1. This section changes.. Subsection 10 of Section 19 -7 (Nuisances) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) l 0) The City prohibits the outside storage of items such as but not limited to, pails, barrels lumber, scrap wood, cans, recyclable materials vehicle parts, inoperable machinery, equipment parts, brush,. pipes, household appliances, household fu rniture, building materials,. scrap metal, 'unko similar materials.. This subsection shall not apply to the following_. building materials or equipment being. actively used in new construction firewood meetin the r equirements of Section 19 -9(23 (d items that are not visible from surrounding propert y l ines any of the above materials that are bein% used as part of a legal business (This exemption shall not apply, to junk or waste materials. 2 � 7 F e SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the City approves it and the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 1994. 2 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM As sistant City Manager � RE: LIQUOR ORDINANCE: COMMUNITY CENTER DATE: September 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION ,Action by CQ Oil. ** Endorsed Modified ]Rej e0te mom" Date— At the September 12 meeting, the City Council approved first reading of the Liquor Ordinance for the Community Center. This item is to request second reading and adoption of the ordinance. Section 5 -156 and 5 -157 allow the sale of alcohol per drink and Section 5 -158 allows a host to provide the beverage at no cost to the designated event guests. RECOMMENDATION It is :recommended that the City Council conduct second reading of the proposed ordinance for adoption of the ordinance controlling alcoholic beverages at the Community Center. SENT BY: 9 -16 -94 : 4 : 02PM BANN 1 QAN & KELLY 612 770 =1506 : � ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE FOR TTiE MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER AND THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Article III, SECnON 5 -1 is hereby added to read as follows: DIVISION 4, intoxicating liquors at Maplewood Community C ent er , Section 5-156. Intoxicating liquor may be sold in the Maplewood Community Center only under the following conditions: (a) by the holder of a retail on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the City of Maplewood. (17) the licensee is engaged to dispense intoxicating liquor. at an event by a person or organization permitted to »se, a designated morn in the Ma pl,�'w�od Cornmun' I t Center. (c) liquor is dispensed only to persons attending the event in the designated room for which th.e r was rent and such dispensing is done only in the room which w as ren ted. (d th.e licensee delivers to the City a ce rtificate of insurance providing "off premises liquor lia-bility coverage naming the City of Maplcwo�od, to the full extelit of statutory coverage, as an additional named insure (e) all U(l1�J I L11C� U11d I QgUlatlolls established by the City of Maplewood relating to the sale or dispensing of intoxicating l iquor in said community center are complied with. (f) Boer, whie, and intoxicating liquor may only be served until midnight (12:00 a.m.) on al.] evenings, Sunday - Saturday. SECTION 5 -157, WINE LICENSES. The sale. of wine not exceeding fourteen ( 14%) percent alcohol by volume for consumption may be scald in the Maplewood Community Center only tender the following conditions: (a) by the fin1fler of an on -4-rile, wing license issucd by taw, City of Maplewood. (b) the licensee is engaged to disperse wine at an event by a person or organization Permitted to use the designated roam of (lie Maplewood Community Center. (c) wine is dispensed only to persons attending the event in the designated room for W thF, room was rented and 511�;h dispensing is done only in the ro which SENT BY: 9-16-94 4 : 03PM BANN I GAN & KELLY 612 770 4306 : # 3/ 4 was rented. The licensee shall serve wine according to Maplewood City ordinances. (d) the licensee delivers to the City a certificate of insurance providing off -- premises liability coverage naming the City of Maplewood, in the amount of statutory limits, as an additional named insured. (e) all other rules and regulations established by the City relating to the dispensing of wine in said community center are complied with. The hours of service shall be according to Maplewood City ordinances. ( Beer, wine, and intoxicating liquors may only be served until midnight (12 :00 a.m.) on all evenings, Sunday - Saturday. SECTION 5 -158 WINE, BEER AND INTOXICATING LIQUOR. Wine, beer and intoxicating liquor may be served in the Maplewood Community Center under the following conditions. (a) If served pursuant to Sections 5 -156 and 5 -157 as above stated; (b) - Service and consumption of wiur, bcui vi i«tk)jUt;aGuS" liquor is by the person Or organization permitted to use said Maplewood Cormnun..i.ty Center and said wine, beer or intoxicating liquor must be provided by the person, organization or group hosting the activity or event; (c) No compensation of any nature may be exchanged for the beer, wine or intoxicating liquor. Compensation for purposes of this section include donate, advanced sale of tickets and tips and the payment of any kind or nature to the host in exchange for said wine, beer and intoxicating liquor may only be served according to the ordinance time elements established by Maplewood City ordinances. Beer, wine and intoxicating liquor may only be served until midnight (12:00 a.m.) on all evenings of the week, Sunday - Saturday; (d) All parties consuming leer, wine or intoxicating liquor in the Maplewood Community Center shall be required to conform to all state liquor laws with any and all niles and regulations regulating the serving or consumption of beer, wine or intoxicating liquor as established by the City of Maplewood; (e) The wine, beer or intoxicating liquor provided by the person, organization. or group hosting the activity or event must be served by a designated bartender registered with the City of Maplewood. {#} Wine, beet or intoxicating liquor is may be dispensed only to persons attending the event in the designated room for which the room was rented, and such di.spensing, in done only in the room which was rented. AGENDA N4. TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director AGENDA REPORT Action by Council *# Endorse 11adiftea �e�,ee�tea Dat RE: ORDINANCE TO SET RECYCLINGr RAVES FOR 1995 (SECOND READING) DATE: September 15, 1994 Can September 12th the City Council approved first reading of the attached ordinance to increase the recycling charge by $1.25 per quarter effective 1 -1 -95 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 1995 budget. Attached is a copy of the agenda report from that meeting. It is recommended that second reading_ of the attached ordinance (Exhibit B) be approved to increase the recycling charge effective 1 -1 -95. W :AGN/RECYCHRG.2nd Attachments AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Finance Director RE: ORDINANCE TO SET RECYCLING RATES FOR 1995 (MST READING) DATE: September 2, 1994 PROPOSAL It is proposed that the recycling charge be increased by $1.25 per quarter effective 1 -1 -95 to provide the revenues anticipated in the 1995 budget. BACKGROUND Until 1992, Ramsey Count collected recycling charges and reimbursed the City for Y Y g g Y the cost of the City's contractor who handled the curbside recycling program. In 1991, the City instituted a $1 per quarter recycling program charge for all residents and commercial properties. In 1992 the recycling charge was increased to enable the City to fund the entire curbside recycling program as the County stopped assessin g the residents on the property tax statements. Also in 1992, the $1 per quarter recycling charge on non- residential units for recycling education was discontinued to simplify P Y billing procedures. PROPOSED 1995 BUDGET The attached Exhibit A shows the Proposed 1995 Budget for the Recycling Program Fund. The recommended 1995 recycling charge rates that are Po ro sed will finance P 69% of the anticipated expenditures. Most of the remaining expenditures will be financed by a grant from the County. Agenda Report — Ordinance to Set Recycling Rates for 1995 (First Reading) September 2, 1994 Page 2 .1995 RECYCLING CHARGE RATE Exhibit A indicates that $151,300 is needed from recycling charges to finance the Y g g 1995 recycling costs. It is anticipated that 12,400 housing units will be billed in 1995. Therefore, a quarterly recycling charge of $3.05 will be needed to produce the g P required revenues. In 1994, the quarterly recycling charge was $1.80. An alternative to an increase in the recycling charge rate would be to levy property taxes to provide the additional revenues needed in 1995. This would require a $63,660 increase in the proposed tax levy for 1995. (Assuming a 97.8% tax collection rate, the net tax revenues would be $62,660.) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that first reading of the attached ordinance (Exhibit B) be approved to increase the recycling charge effective 1 -1 -95. lz W:AGfN/RECYCHRO lST Attachments EXHIBIT A CITY OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA Recycling Program Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures 15,669 (24 (11,270) 1994 28,280 1995 ACCT. 66,635 1992 1993 ORIGINAL Residual equity transfers out: MGR. ADOPTED NO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET RE -EST. PROPOSED BUDGET 0 Intergovernmental: ----------------- (25,545) Fund Balance - December 31 $66,635 ----------------------------------- $41,951 - - - - -- - - -- 3534 County- other grants $82 $64 $64,230 $65. $67,050 Charges for Service: 3781 --------------- - - -- Recycling charges 85 87 86,910 89,040 151 Miscellaneous Revenue: 3801 Interest on investments 2 2 2,760 1 600 Total Revenues ------------------------------------------------------- 170,393 153 153,900 155,690 218,950 Total Expenditures 154,724 - - - - - - - - - - - - 178,608 - - - - - - - - - - 165,170 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 181 - - - - - - - - - 190,670 - - - - - - - - - - - Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures 15,669 (24 (11,270) (25 28,280 Fund Balance - January 1 50 66,635 65,954 41,951 16 Residual equity transfers out: General Fund ------------------ 0 0 0 0 (25,545) Fund Balance - December 31 $66,635 ----------------------------------- $41,951 $54,684 $16,331 $19,066 EXHIBIT B ORDINANCE NO. PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MAPLEWOOD CODE FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RECYCLING CHARGES The Maplewood City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Sec. 16 -58 is hereby . amended to read as follows: All residential property shall be billed $3.05 per unit per quarter for solid waste reduction and recycling.. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 1995. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk AGENDA ITEM J AGENDA REPORT Action, by Council. TOO City Manager Endorsed„„ Mod�ied FROM: City Engineer ineer c Re. eoted Date SUBJECT: Maplewood Mall Traffic Improvements, Project 89 -21 P 1 DATE: September 20, 1994 Ramsey County, Mn /DOT, and the city have been successful in assemblin a funding g package to address the Maplewood Mall Traffic Improvements. Federal fundin through the ISTEA of $800,000 is the major source of funding. In addition, approximately $200,000 of local funds would come from Mn /DOT cooperative agreement, county state aid highway, and municipal state aid funding sources. Maplewood is the lead agency for this ro'ect. It is our job to contract for p 1 professional services and construction next summer. Consultant for the project, Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc., has submitted a preliminary proposal outlining the work and estimating costs. The tasks cover all of the necessary rep public p involvement, and other investigations to create a final set of construction plans and specifications. This work is estimated to cost $155,325. In order to proceed with construction next summer, it is requested the city enter into an agreement with the consultant at this time to begin work on the project. It is recommended the city staff be authorized to enter into an ar- agreement with Str g 9 Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. to prepare a design for the Maplewood Mail. Traffic Improvements at a cost not to exceed $155,325. KGH jc T -.2, MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Shoreland Ordinance DATE: August 22, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by C oup i Rndoxs a ..,.;�,�, Modifie Re J ecterl Date The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is requiring Maplewood to revise its shoreland ordinance. BACKGROUND On January 24, 1983, the City Council adopted the shoreland ordinance. It created shoreland overlay districts around DNR designated public waters. The � p regulations in shoreland districts are more restrictive than for land outside the shoreland districts. On July 11, 1988, the Council approved a change to the shoreland ordinance. This change exempted nonwater- frontage developments that would not be visible from the lake from the height and density .limitations. A developer requested this change for a sernor housing project. The project was P lanned, but not built on the Seaver Lake Lutheran Church property. DISCUSSION We have based the proposed ordinance on a model ordinance written by the DNR. Some of the DNR's standards apply to a city's subdivision regulations some to the general zoning ordinance and some to other sections of the City Code, such as water systems or sewers. We have consequently changed the DNR's model ordinance to fit Maplewood's Code. The non - shoreland sections of the ordinance describe the changes from current regulations. The Shoreland Ordinance starts on page 13. I have made notes in the margins of the new shoreland ordinance about which changes are new and which are current or revisions of the old ordinance. The old shoreland ordinance starts on P a g e 37. The new ordinance starts on page 4. The new ordinance creates the following major changes from the current regulations: 1. After December 31, 1995, the City cannot issue a building permit for a new principal structure, bedroom or bathroom if a nonconforming sewage treatment system is on the property. (Section 2, page 4) 2. Minimum lot areas would not include wetlands. The current ordinance only exempts storm water ponds. (Section. 7, page 6) �3. The definition of planned unit development (PUD) would require at least five dwelling units instead of a minimum of five acres. (page 9) 4. Nonconfornung lots could be built on and nonconforming buildings could be expanded with certain conditions. (Section 17, pages 11 -12) 5. Section 36- 566(a) (pages 18 -22) drops the height restrictions for non- residential uses,, since the DNR regulations do not require them. 6. For each Class of water, Section 36 566(x) (pages 18 - 22) creases separate standards for single, two -unit, three -unit and four•unit buildings.. The current standards have only two classifications - single dwellings and multiple dwellings. All buildings with more than four units must be approved as a planned unit development. 7. Section 36- 566(a)(4) (page 24) adds lot width and setback standards for the two creeks. 8. Section 36- 566(b)(2) (page 25) adds special standards for double, three -unit and four -unit buildings around natural environment lakes. 9. Section 36- 566(b)(3) (pages 26) creates standards for public access lots and access lots used by surrounding neighbors. 10. Section 36- 566(c) (pages 26 -29) adds standards for the placement, design and height of structures. 11..Section 36 -570 (page 32) adds special standards for non - residential uses. 12. Section 36 -571 (pages 32 -33) adds standards for conditional use permits in shorelands. 13. Section 36 -572 (page 33) adds standards for expanding or adding decks to nonconforming structures. 14. Section 36 -574 (pages 34-36) adds standards for planned unit developments. 2 I am submitting this draft to the Planning Commission and City Council for first reading. The City must then submit the draft to the DNR for their review. I will then bring back the draft with the DNR's changes to the Planning Commission and City Council for second reading. Because of a heavy workload, the DNR told me that their review will probably take several months. RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached shoreland ordinance. go/b- 7:shore3.mem (S.1) Attachments: 1. Proposed Shoreland Ordinance 2. Existing Shoreland Ordinance 3 Attachment 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REVISING ARTICLE IX, SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT AND OTHER RELATED SECTIONS OF THE CODE The .Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: SECTION 1. This section changes Section 28-76 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 28 -76. Individual sewage treatment systems -- Conformance to state standards. The city sewer system must be used where available. where the city engineer determines that a municipal sewer is not available, any_ use moducim sewage shall have an individual sewage treatment system. ,A sewage treatment system means a septic tank and soil absorption system or other individual or , cluster We sewage treatment system. A permit from the City is required to install or ,alter a sewage treatment system. All individual sewage treatment systems must meet or exceed the Minnesota Pollution_ Control Agenc3 's standards. These„ standards are in the document titled "Indivi, dual Sewage Treatment Systems ems Standards Chapter 7080 ". Sufficient soil borings= ercolation tests. shall be iprovided so the Cily can determine a site's suitabilily for an individuals wage treatment syst_em__ fn ad n n io n n=4 drni:ngald area SECTION 2. This section adds a new Section 28-78 as follows: Sec. 28 -78. Nonconforming individual sewage treatment systems. (a) After December 31, 1995, the City shall not issue a building permit for a new principal structure or for the addition of a bedroom or bathroom, unless any nonconforming sewage treatment system on the property meets current standards. Except that the City shall not consider a sewage treatment system nonconforming if the only deficiency is the setback of the sewage treatment system from the ordinary high water level of a lake or creek. 4 (b) The owner of any nonconforming sewage treatment system that the City determines to be a public nuisance shall bring the system into conformance or stop using the system within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the City. SECTION 3. This section changes the following definfions in Section 30-2 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Lot means a pa_ reel of land that is described separately from other parcels of land by a plats metes and bounds, regl: stered land survey auditor's plat or other accepted means. The lot description must be recorded by the County Tin =A t ' n ^f n CuLd it�;�. L ot rea means the area of a. lot excluding drainaze easements, wetlands and land below the ordinary high water mark of public waters. Lot Division means the division of a property by metes and bounds descri ption. Public waters: Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, subdivisions 14 and 15. Subdivision means the separation of an area, parcel or tract of land into two or more parcels, tracts, lots or long -term leasehold interests for sale, rent or lease, 46 °'�@ except those separations: (a) Where all the resulting parcels, tracts, lots or interests will be twenty (20) acres or larger and five hundred (500) feet in width for residential uses and five (5) acres or larger 0 0 �e for all other uses; (b) Creating cemetery lots; (c) .Resulting from court orders. Wetland means a surface water feature classified as a wetland in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Circular No. 39 (1971 edition). SECTION 4. This section adds a new Subsection 30 -3(d) as follows: (d) The City shall not approve a subdivision where a later variance would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. 5 SECTION 5. This section changes Subsection 3a5(a) as follows: (I underlined the additions.) (a) Before dividing any tract of land into (4). or more lots, a subdivider shall submit a preliminary plat application to the director of community development. The director of community development shall determine the necessary application requirements and state them on a written form to be made available to the public at his or her office. These requirements shall apply to plats and lot, divisions. The director may waive any requirements that do not apply to the proposed subdivision. SECTION 6. This section adds a new Subpart 30 -8(e) (3) (Minimum subdivision design standards- Easements) as follows: Wetland easements. The Ci ma y require a wetland easement over and beyond a wetland. The wetland easement shall prohibit any structures, mowing, uttin& filling or dumping within the easement. The City Council shall determine th easement's size based on the wetland's Quality, the amount and quality of Surrounding habitat, the site's building restraints and whether the wetland will be partially filled. The City. may require a developer to _place si ms around the easement boundary. These suns shall identify the easement's boun restrictions. SECTION 7. This section adds a new Subpart 30 - 8(0(7) (Minimum subdivision design standards -Lots) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) ( 7) Lot areas. , n:m 444 %4 ..A. ate net SHULLO.Jeet te:, 0 61 L 8 %e F EIL . Minimum lot areas shall not include public waters wetlands or drainage easements for storm water ponds. Lots in a shoreland overlay district must meet the shoreland rezulations in Chapter 36, Article IX . SECTION 8. This section deletes Subpart 30-8(fl (10) (Minimum subdivision design standards -Lots) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) (10) Reserved. S:eeUc Uvftes .— A - setLaelrc U:mte jzL�'�a ci ^•�rvirccc^ci ] ciT f20l F et &....Y, r1,e .. .,, -+.r 1: «„ and ..1..,11 1.., .. «r; «,,..., . ,ti *t.;« ,,.,.,1.. .. «+;.... 1.1.,..L I SECTION 9. This section adds a new Subpart 30-8(0 (13) (Minimum subdivision design standards -Lots) as follows: (13) Where the city engineer determines that city sanitary sewer service is not available, all new . subdivided lots shall have usable space for an individual sewage treatment system and additional usable space to add a second drainfield. SECTION 10. This section changes Section. 30 15(a) (Lot divisions) as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) (a) A lot division shall not result in the creation of more than three new lots. 1 . 2 8 F t e 6. V f� V SECTION 11. This section changes Section 30 -15(d) (Lot Divisions) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) (d) The City shall not approve more than three new lots from a parcel G.B. %efiea laet .. in any single calendar year. SECTION 12. This section adds a new Section 35-5 as follows: Sec. 35 -5. Water Quality Standards. Any public or private supply of water for domestic purposes must meet or exceed the water uali standards of the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota q tY Pollution Control Agency. SECTION 13. This section changes Section 36-1 as follows: (I underlined the additions and L crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36 -1. Short title and a ' ' tration. This chapter shall be known as "The Maplewood Zoning Ordinance." The director of community development shall administer this chanter. SECTION 14. This section changes Section 36-4 as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36-4. Interpretation; controlling provisions. �g- a-appl ' The provisions of this chapters shall be interpreted to. provide lflehd te the minimum requirements for the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and ane p tY general welfare. where g provisions of this chapter conflicts with anv other, the most restrictive requirement shall a l • a ID v • gr • SECTION 15. This section adds and deletes the following definitions to section 36-6 (definitions): (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Commercial use: A principal use of land or buildings for the sale, lease, rental or trade of products, zoods or services. Building line: The line parallel to the street line at a distance therefrom equal to the dep of the front and required for the district in which the lot is located. For a lot p Y q fronting on a public water, the bun din line shall include a. line parallel to the ordinary high water level at the required setback therefrom. Deck: A horizontal unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features that is attached or functionally related to a principal use. _Dwelling site: A designated location for residential use, including_ temporary or movable shelter such as camping and recreational vehicle sites. Dwellinz unit: Any structure or portion of a structure that is designed as short- or long -term living quarters,, including motel units, hotel units or cabins. Height of building: The vertical distance between a building's highest adjoining ound level or ten feet above the building's lowest ground lev whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. ' 3 L %X-L 16A&%.- or *�, ° r ^ ^� rr ^t °� *�,.�* Height of building shall not include chimneys, spires, towers, r .& %If elevator penthouses, tanks or similar building projections ef thheo . Shffl.11 :.met 8 Industrial use: The use of land or buildings to produce, manufacture, store or transfer g oods, products, commodities or other items. Lot: A arcel of land that is described separate1v from other arcels of land. _b -.a l.at metes and bounds, re land survey auditor's plat or other accepted means. The lot descriptimust be recorded by the Coun . • str e nhn �a ffi ..e s • u `j t J� . Lot area: The area of , a lot, excluding drainaze easements, wetlands and land below third narhzh water mark of public waters. Mfg: The surface or subsurface removal of sand, gavel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals and eat not re laced under Minnesota Statutes secti m ons 93.44 to 93.51. Planned unit development (PUD) A We of development characterized by a unified site design, with two (2) or more principal uses or structures. A PUD may, include town houses apartments multi -use structures such as an a artment with commercial shoT)s orL similar prole cts.^ Residential PUD must have at least five dwelling units or dwelling sites. Residential planned unit development: A residential use that is nontransient, and the pn= focus of the development is not service - oriented. For example, residential apartments manufactured home arks residential condominiums apart , town houses �I Imp cooperatives, single - dwelling homes and multiple dwellings would meet this definition. Semipublic use: The use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a Dublic service that is ordinaril, y open to persons outside the rezular constituency of the orIz nization. Setback: The minimum horizontal distance between any part of a structure, sewaze treatment system or other facility and an ordinary hi h water level, sewage treatment system, top of a bluff, property line or another structure. Setbacks shall not include eaves tters cornices steps chimneys or fire laces proiectina not more than. two feet from the principal structure, rru N u x=ct::S*L331aC ef Y ) 7 ys Sewage treatment system:_ A septic tank and soil absorption system or other individual or cluster type sewaze treatment system. Structure: Any buildin,z or appurtenance that is constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the mound.. This does not include aerial or underground utility lines, such . as sewer electric tele hone telegr zas lines towers. , oles or other supiportin facilities. Subdivision: The separation of an area, _parcel or tract of land into two or more parcels, tracts, lots, or long -term leasehold interests for sale, rent or lease, L except those separations: Where all the resulting - parcels tracts, lots or interests will be twenty acres or lar er and 500 feet in width for residential uses and five acres or larger for all other uses; (b) Creating cemetery lots; c Resulting from court orders. Variance: The same as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter. Oz. • .� > > .� > > 10 SECTION 16. This section changes Section 36-8 as follows: (I underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36 -8. Violations. &y violation of this article (includin-z violations of conditions. established in connection with variances or conditional use ermits shall be a misdemeanor and shall be punishable as defined by law. Violations of this article can occur whether. or not the City or State reg,uires a permit for a rezulated activity. ' E, h day that any violation continues shall constitute a separate violation. SECTION 17. This section changes Subsection 36 -17(h) and adds a new Subsection 36-17(1) as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.) A nonconforminz structure or parking lot may be expanded if the structure or parking lot meets the following conditions: T�,a ��t � • n rr�rse� r.�•��ar�tr (1) The zoning rezulatlons permit the use. . (2) The expansion would meet the minimum setbacks required by this chapter or the setbacks of the existing _srructure, whichever are less. The expansion shall not exceed the maximum height required by this chapter or the existing height, whichever is taller. The Cily mav aipprove a conditional use ermit to deviate from these requirements. Tz Q L 3 U d i = � ,. n � i � cc rap l eta z ra nr� qr to W W Uft&o WA 4 1WW (3) The minimum setback from the ordinary hzh water level in a shoreland district would be at least the average setback. of adjacent residential structures or (5 feet, whichever is greater. ' All :mr-aciantly n=nlianWa 63314 ei:qs are . (4) All portions of said structure would be are on the applicant's property. (5) Runoff from the overhang of r.aM stmez addition would is not adversely affecting an adjacent property. 11 The City shall allow construction on nonconfomunz lots that do not meet the lot size width frontage or depth re uirements if the. lots meet the following re uirements: Since becoming substandard, the lots have always been in separate ownershiu from abutting la_nd_s_. 2 The lots were of record in the counly recorder's office on the date of enactment of this article. 3 There is no evidence that the lots did not meet the official controls in effect at the time the dots were. approved. Anv sewa e treatment s stem meets the re uirements of this Code. The proposed use would be permitted by the zoning regulations. SECTION 18. This section adds a new Section 36-18 as follows: Sec. 36-18. variances. . The City may grant variances to the requirements of this chapter. All variances must follow the p rovisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. The City may approve administrative variances in accordance with Article VI of this chapter. SECTION .19. This section changes the title to Subsection 36-438 and Subsection 36- 438(a) as follows: (I crossed out the deletions.) Sec. 36 -438. Planned unit developments generally; purpose and intent, requirements. Ca) ' PUP nu ' . A PUD may not be divided unless the density distribution approved in the PUD is ensured. 12 SECTION- 20. This section adds the following subsections to Section 36 -438 (PUD s): (d) Common open space. The developer shall provide deed restrictions, covenants, easements, public dedication or other equally effective and permanent means to preserve and maintain any common open space. The instruments must include all of the following protection: 1 Except for routine maintenance, the City must approve the alteration of any vegetation or topography that is visible from a public water. 2. Prohibit the exterior storage of vehicles or other materials. Storage shall not include routine vehicle parking or the temporary storage of materials for an on- going construction project. 3. If on a public water, prohibit the uncontrolled beaching of watercraft. (e) Owners' association. All planned unit developments with common open space must have an owners' association with the following features: 1. Each lot owner must be a member. 2. Each member must pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid association assessments can become liens on units or sites. 3. Association assessments must be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions. 4. The association must be responsible for insurance, taxes and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. (f) The City shall designate PUD s on the City's official zoning map. SECTION 21. This section replaces the wording in Article IX of Chapter 36 with the following wording: ARTICLE IX. SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT �G ! yE � Sec. 36 -561. Authorization, purpose and objectives. (a) Authorization. State Statutes and regulations authorize Article IX. The specific M sources are Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 105 (Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals); Minnesota Regulations, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462 (the planning and zoning enabling legislarion). L 13 . (b) Purpose and objectives. The purpose of this article is to provide specific regulations to protect the City's shorelands. It is in the public's best interest to provide for the. wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands. To accomplish this purpose, Article IX has the following objectives: (1) Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters. (2) Protect the natural environment and visual appeal of shorelands. (3) Protect the general health, safety and welfare of city residents. Sec. 36 -562. Definitions. k vi ty The following words shall have the following meanings: M Average lot area: The average of the lot areas within a single development. To be �. g g g p included in the average lot area, all lots must be divided together. For a single lot, the minim allowable area shall be no less than the average lot area requirement. v Bluff: A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff or embankment having all of the followin characteristics (land with an avera a sloe of less than 18 ercent for 50 feet g g p p or more shall not be considered p art of the bluff) : (1) Part or all of the feature is in a shoreland; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4) The slope must drain toward a public water. Bluff impact zone: A bluff and land that is within twenty feet of the top of a bluff. Boathouse: A structure designed and used solely for the storage of boats or boating equipment. Commissioner: The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources or his or her representative. Intensive vegetation clearing: The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a specific patch, strip, row or block. 14 Nonpoint source pollutant: A contaminant that enters water by washing off the land or see in into ound water, alters the physical, chemical or biological seep mg �' � p Y propert ertes of water or the discharge into water of any substance that may create a nuisance or make such water detrimental or harm the public health, safety or welfare. Ordinary high h water level: The boundary of public waters. For lakes, this boundary shall be at an elevation dehneatin g the highest water level that has existed for a sufficient time to leave evidence upon the landscape. This evidence is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from p predominantly aquatic to g g p predominantly terrestrial. For creeks, the ordinary high water level shall be the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. Public waters: Any waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, subdivisions 14 and 15. Regional flood: A flood that represents the large floods known to have occurred in Minnesota. Such a flood is characteristic of what a person can expect to occur about once every one hundred (100) years. Shore .impact zone: The land between the ordinary high water level and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of the structure setback. Shoreland: Land that is within the shoreland overlay district on the city's zoning maps. Shoreline: The boundary of a public water. Steep slope: Land having average slopes over twelve (12) percent, as measured over horizontal distances of fifty (50) feet or more, that are not bluffs. Surface water - oriented use: The use of land where access to and use of a lake is an integral part of the normal use. Marinas, resorts and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such use. Toe of the bluff: The lower point of a fifty (50) -foot land segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen (18) percent. Top of the bluff: The higher point of a fifty (50) -foot land segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen (18) percent. Urban runoff: Storm water that flows over land or through aman -made drainage system. 15 Water - oriented � accessory structure: A small, above- ground building or other improvement that the owner needs to locate closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Such a setback would be because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses or freestanding decks. Stairways, fences docks or retainin g walls shall not be included as water - oriented accessory structures or facilities. Wetland: A surface water feature as defined in Chapter 1038 of State Statute (The Wetland Conservation Act). Sec. 36 -563. Shoreland Overlay Districts. � (a) The City hereby creates a shoreland overlay district, with its attendant � regulations, as part of the zoning ordinance. This district shall overlay existing zoning N ' districts, so that any parcel of land lying in the overlay district also shall lie in one or more of the underlying zoning districts. (b) Within the overlay district, the City shall permit all uses allowed by the � underlying zoning district(s), if the uses meet the additional requirements in this Article. (c) Article IX shall only apply to the shoreland districts on the official zoning maps. These maps shall be on file in the office of the Director of Community Development. The City has classified the affected waters in Section 36 -565. (d) The City staff may reduce the limits of a shoreland on the zoning map whenever the commissioner determines that a public water has topographic divides that are closer to the public water than the shoreland boundary on the zoning map. Sec. 36 -564. Notifications to the conunissioner. (a) The City shall send public hearing notices for amendments, subdivisions, plats, n variances or conditional uses under this article to the commissioner. The City shall mail such notices at least ten days before the hearings. Hearing notices about subdivisions shall include copies of the subdivision. � (b) The City shall send a copy of approved amendments, subdivisions, variances or conditional uses under this article to the commissioner. The City shall mail all such � approvals within ten days of final action. When the City approves a variance after the commissioner has recommended denial, the notification of the approved variance shall include the City Council's minutes of the public hearing. 16 e� \` Sec. 36 -565. Shoreland Classification System. (a) The city has classified its public waters based on the DNR's Protected Waters Inventory Map. The city used the following classification criteria (percentages apply � only to the shoreland located in the city): (1) Class I waters are those that. the DNR has designated general development � waters, and the city land use plan shows at least seventy -five (75) percent of the shoreland for commercial or industrial use. (2) Class II waters are those that the DNR has designated general development waters, and do not qualify for Class I status. (3) Class III waters are those that the DNR has designated recreation development waters having: a. At least sixty (60) .percent of the shoreline in public ownership, or b. At least fifty (50) percent of the shoreland in public ownership and less than ten (10) .percent of the shoreland remaining for development, excluding public open space. (4) Class IV waters are those that the DNR has designated recreation development waters, and do not qualify for Class III status. (5) Class V waters are those that the DNR has designated natural environmental waters. (b) The City has classified its lakes as follows: (1) Class I waters Public Waters Inventory I.D.# 3M Pond 62 -0017 Tanner's Lake 82 -0115 (2) Class II waters Public Waters Inventory I.D. # Gervais Lake 62 -0007 17 (3) Class III waters Public Waters Inventory I.D. # Casey Lake Keller Lake Lake Phalen Silver Lake Spoon Lake Wakefield Lake 62 - 0005 62 -0010 62 -0013 62 -0001 62 -0011 (4) Class IV waters Public Waters Inventory I.D. # Carver Lake 82 -0166 Kohlman Lake 62 -0006 Oehrline's Lake 62 - 0014 (5) Class V waters Public Waters Inventory I.D. # Beaver Lake 62 -0016 Round Lake 62 - 0012 (c) The City has classified its two creeks as tributary streams. The two creeks are Battle Creek and Fish Creek Sec. 36 -566. District development standards. to (a) Lot and Building Standards. The following lot and building standards shall apply a to commercial developments and residential developments with four or fewer dwelling units per building. The City must approve developments with more than four units per building as planned unit developments. � With Sanitary Without Sanitary � Sewer Sewer to (1) Class I waters a. Non - residential development 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 NA 2. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from OHWL (feet) NA NA 18 3. Maximum Impervious surface area (percent) 50 50 With bonus (percent)* 70 70 b. Single dwelling 1. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 75 NA Other. lots (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 NA 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 15 NA Other lots (square feet) 10,000 NA 5. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 40 NA Other lots (percent) 50 NA (2) Class II and III waters a. Non - residential development 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 75 2. Minimum water frontage (feet). 75 100 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA 75 19 4. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 40 With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 Other lots (percent) 60 b. Single dwelling 1. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 75 150 Other lots (feet) 75 100 2. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 75 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA 75 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 15,000 40,000 Other lots (square feet) 10,000 20,000 S. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 30 With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 40 40 Other lots (percent) 50 50 C. Two -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 NA 2. Minimum lot width 135 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 26,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 17,500 NA 20 d. Three -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 50 NA 2. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 195 NA Other lots (feet) 190 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 38,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 25,000 NA e. Four -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the. OHWL (feet) 50 NA 2. Minimum lot width Water - frontage lots (feet) 255 NA Other lots (feet) 245 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 49,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 32 NA (3) Class N and V waters a. Non - residential development. 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 100 21 2. Minimum water frontage per development (feet) 75 150 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA 75 4. Maximum impervious I surface area (percent) 30 30 With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 40 40 Other lots (percent) 50 50 b. Single dwelling 1. Minimum lot width (feet) 75 150 2. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 100 3. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWL (feet) NA 75 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 20,000 40,000 Other lots (square feet) 15,000 40,000 . S. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 30 With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 40 40 Other lots (percent) 50 50 d. Two -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum lot width (feet) 135 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 22 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 26,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 35 NA e. Three -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from the OHWL (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 195 NA Other lots (feet) 190 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 50,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 38,000 NA f. Four -unit dwellings 1. Minimum building setback from • the OHWL (feet) 75 NA 2. Minimum lot width Water frontage lots (feet) 255 NA Other lots (feet) 245 NA 3. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 NA With bonus* Water frontage lots (percent) 50 NA Other lots (percent) 60 NA 4. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 65,000 NA Other lots (square feet) 49 NA *Refer to subsection 36- 566(b)(1)(d) for requirements to qualify for an impervious surface area bonus. NKI (4) Lot width and .setback standards for creeks a. The lot width standards for single, double dwellings, three -unit buildings and four -unit adjacent buildings in shorelands to creeks are as follows: J Unsewered Severed Single dwelling 100 75 Double dwelling 150 115 Three -unit. building 200 150 Four -unit building 250 190 b. Structure and sewage system setbacks (in feet) from the ordinary high water level of tributary streams Structures Sewage Treatment Unsewered Severed System � 100 50 75 (b) Additional Special Provisions 4° a � (1) Reduction in development standards a. The City shall reduce all applicable development standards by one public � V waters classification where a shoreland property meets all of the following ,conditions: yip � 1. A principal or major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan, separates the property from any public waters. 2. The property does not drain directly to a public water. 3. The visual impact of the property from the lake surface is minimal. (i.e., A property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II standards.) b. The city shall raise the maximum required building height to forty-two (42) feet from any street side for structures that would be at least eighty (80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of a public water during the summer. 24 C. The minimum lot area requirements in Section 36- 566(a) shall not apply to developments that meet all of the following conditions: 1. The development is at least eighty (80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline during the summer. 2. The development shall have no frontage or private docking facilities on a public water. 3. The development meets the impervious surface area requirements. d. Impervious surface area bonus. 1. The impervious surface area limits shall be determined using the total p developable area of a arcel (above the ordinary high water level and suitable for development), exclusive of streets and sidewalks. 2. The developer or owner shall provide and maintain significant man- made facilities for the reduction of storm water flow or the treatment of urban run -off for non point source water pollutants to qualify for an p impervious surface area bonus. 3. The city engineer shall determine whether a proposed management practice(s) is adequate to warrant a bonus. A bonus may range from one to twenty (20) percent for nonwater frontage lots and from one to ten (10) percent for water frontage properties, dependent upon the practice(s) proposed. The city engineer shall forward a copy of proposed bonuses to the DNR for their comments. (2) In addition to other standards in this chapter, double and three -unit and four- unit dwellings on Natural Environment Lakes must meet the following standards: a. Each building must be set back at least 200 feet from the ordinary high water level. b. Watercraft docking facilities for each building must be consolidated in one location. c. No more than 25 percent of a lake's shoreline can be in double, three -unit or four -unit dwelling developments. 25 t o r ` (3) Lots used as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of non - riparian lots must meet or exceed the following standards: a. If doc king, mooring or over -water storage of more than six (6) watercraft is to be allowed at a controlled access lot, then the width of the lot must be increased by the percent of the requirements for riparian residential lots for each watercraft beyond . six, consistent with the following table: Controlled. Access Lot Frontage Requirements Ratio of lake size to shore length (acres /mile) Less than 100 100 -200 201 -300 301 -400 Greater than 400 Required increase in frontage (percent) 25 20 15 10 5 b. All owners of non - riparian lots in a subdivision who have riparian access rights on an access lot must jointly own the access lot. C. The owner shall record against the title of the affected properties covenants or other equally effective legal instruments that specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot. The covenants must do the following: 1. Limit the allowed number of vehicle parking. 2. Limit the allowed number of watercraft that the owners mood dock or store over water. (This shall not include temporary docking.) 3. Require centralization of all common facilities and activities to lessen topographic and vegetative alterations. 4. Require screening of all parking areas, storage buildings and other facilities from a public water, assuming summer conditions. Screening shall use vegetation or topography as much as practical. (c) Placement, design and height of structures. (1) Structure placement. where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be changed without a variance to conform to the adjoining setbacks from the ordinary high water level, 26 provided that the proposed building site is not in a shore impact zone or in a bluff impact zone. a. Regardless of a waterbody's classification, structures or facilities shall be set back at least thirty (30) feet from the top of a bluff and fifty (50) feet from an unplatted cemetery. b. There shall be no structures or accessory facilities, except stairways and landings, within bluff impact zones. C. Non - residential uses without water - oriented needs shall not be on lots with public water frontage unless one of the following conditions are met: 1. The use or structure has double the normal setback from the ordinary high water level; or 2. The use or structure is largely screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer conditions. (2) Design Criteria For Structures. a. Floodplain regulations. Development must follow the City's floodplain regulations (Article VIII of Chapter 36). C �< b. Water - oriented accessory structures. Each lot may have no more than one water- oriented accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in Section 36- 566(a), subject to the following conditions: 1. The maximum height shall not exceed ten feet, exclusive of safety rails. Except that detached decks shall not exceed eight feet above grade at any point. 2. The maximum area shall not exceed 250 square feet. Except that on general development and recreational development waterbodies, the maximum area of water - oriented accessory structures used solely for watercraft storage shall be 400 square feet (provided the maximum width of the structure is twenty (20) feet as measured parallel to the configuration of the shoreline). These structures may include the storage of related boating and water - oriented sporting equipment. 3. The setback from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet. 27 4. Vegetation (assuming summer conditions), topography, increased setbacks or color shall be used to reduce the visibility of the structure from public waters or adjacent shorelands. 5. The roof may be used as a deck, but shall not be enclosed or used as a storage area. 6. The structure or facility shall not be designed or used as a dwelling. The structure shall not contain sanitary facilities or sewage treatment facilities. C. Stairways, lifts and landings. Bluffs and steep slopes shall not be graded for the sole purpose of access to a public water, where stairways or lifts can be built or installed. Stairways and lifts must meet the following design requirements: 1. Stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on single- dwelling lots. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts on single dwelling lots must not exceed 32 square feet in area. 3. Stairways, lifts or landings shall not have canopies or roofs. 4. whenever practical, stairways, lifts or landings shall be in the most visually inconspicuous icuous p art of a lot, as viewed from a public water during the summer. 5. Ramps, lifts or mobility paths for physically handicapped persons are allowed to access shore areas, if the owner or builder follows the standards of subparts 1 through 4 above, in addition to the requirements of Minnesota nesota Regulations, Chapter 1340. d. Steep Slopes. The city engineer must evaluate the possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from � p p tY public waters before issuing a p permit to construct sewage treatment systems, roads, driveways, structures or other improvements on steep slopes. When the city engineer determines it necessary, he or she shall attach conditions to permits. These conditions shall prevent erosion and preserve vegetation that screens structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters during the summer. 28 �o 'J y � (3) Height of structures. Unless approved as a planned unit development, the maximum height of all structures in residential districts, except churches and nonresidential agricultural structures, shall be 25 feet. Sec. 36 -567. Shoreland alterations. Veo"\ \y (a) Vegetation alterations (1) This subsection on vegetation alterations does not apply to construction of the following uses: C a. structures and sewage treatment systems b. roads, ramps or parking areas (2) Vegetation may be removed or altered subject to the following standards: a. There shall be no intensive vegetation clearing within the shore or bluff impact zones or on steep slopes. For all other property, the city requires a conditional use permit to clear forest land that is visible from a public water. Such a proposal requires an erosion control and sedimentation plan approved by the City Engineer and based on the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion Control Manual. b. The City shall allow limited cutting, pruning or trinuM ing of trees or shrubs in shore and bluff imp act zones and on steep slopes. This cutting, pruning or trimming shall be limited to providing a view of the water from the site of a dwellin g or to accommodate the placement of stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas or water - oriented accessory structures or facilities. Such limited clearing is subject to the following conditions: 1. Such work not significantly reducing the screening of structures, vehicles or other facilities as viewed from the water during the summer. 2. Preserving the shading of water surfaces along rivers. 3. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs or branches that are dead, diseased or are safety hazards. 29 (b) Topographic alterations /grading and filling (1) Unless part of a building permit, the City shall require a grading and filling permit for: a. The movement of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes, within shore impact zones or in bluff impact zones. b. The movement of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of material outside of steep slopes, shore impact zones or bluff impact zones. (2) The following requirements shall apply to construction permits, grading and fi g p ermits conditional use permits, variances or subdivisions: a. Wetlands shall not be filled without a permit from the watershed board. b. Alterations shall be designed and conducted in a manner that insures that the work exposes only the smallest amount of bare ground for the shortest time possible. C. All development shall meet the City's erosion control ordinance. d. The owner or contractor shall not place fill or excavated material in bluff impact zones. e. The commissioner must authorize any alterations below the ordinary high water level. f. Topographic changes shall only be done if they are accessory to permitted or conditional uses and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby properties. g. The City will permit the placement of natural rock riprap, including associated adin of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, if the �' g following conditions are met: 1. The finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical. 2. The landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level. 3. The height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. 30 (3) The commissioner must approve all connections to public waters. This includes excavations where the intended purp ose is to connect to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons or harbors. Sec. 36 -568. Placement and design of streets, driveways or parlung areas. Public and private streets driveways or parking areas shall be designed to take � C a ) p Y p g advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from public waters. c� (b) Streets, driveways or parking areas shall meet structure setback standards from the ordinary high water level. These facilities shall not be within bluff or shore impact zones if there are reasonable options, If no reasonable options exist, these facilities may p be placed within bluff and shore impact areas. However, these facilities must be designed to minimize adverse impacts. (c) Watercraft access ramps, approach roads or access - related parking may be within shore impact zones if the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this article are met. Sec. 36 -569. Storm water management. (a) General Standards. (1) When possible, natural drainage ways, wetlands and vegetated soil surfaces must be used to convey, store, filter and hold storm water runoff before discharge to public waters. L (2) Development must be planned and conducted to minimize disturbed areas, runoff velocities and erosion. (3) Developments shall maximize the use of surface drainage and vegetation to control storm water run -off. where surface drainage and vegetation are not adequate to handle storm water run -off, the City will allow the use of buried pipes and man -made materials and facilities. 31 (b) Specific Standards. (1) Newly constructed storm water outfalls to public waters must provide for filtering or settling of suspended solids and skimming of surface debris before discharge. (2) All development within shoreland areas shall be consistent with the City Drainage Plan. � Sec. 36 -570. Special provisions for non - residential uses. T (a) Standards for non - residential uses. (1) Surface water - oriented non - residential uses must meet the following standards: a. Such uses shall have topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures. b. Uses that require short -term watercraft mooring for patrons must centralize these facilities and design them to avoid navigation obstructions and to be the minimum size necessary. (2) Non- residential uses without water- oriented needs and having frontage on a public water must meet one of the following standards: a. Double the normal setback from the ordinary high water level setback, or b. Screen the use from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer conditions. (b) Mining. Processing machinery shall meet the structure setback standards from the ordinary high water level and from bluffs. ,�%J Sec. 36 -571. Conditional Uses. (a) In addition to the normal standards for evaluating a conditional use permit, the following standards shall apply within shorelands: ( 1) There would be no soil erosion or pollution of public waters during or after construction. (2) The proposed plan would limit the visibility of structures from public waters (assuming summer conditions), 32 (3) The types, uses and numbers of any watercraft that the project would generate would be compatible with the capacity of the public waters to handle these watercraft. (b) Conditional use permit conditions. The City Council may attach special conditions in shorelands. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level. (2) Limitations on removing the natural vegetation or requiring the planting of additional vegetation. (3) Special location, design and use provisions for structures, sewage treatment systems, watercraft launching and docking areas or parking areas. �k' Sec. 36 -572. Expanding or adding decks to nonconforming structures. A deck may be added to or expanded on a structure if the deck would be within the required setback from the ordinary high water level. The deck must meet all of the following criteria: (1) The structure existed when the City established the structure setbacks. (2) There is no reasonable location for a deck that meets or exceeds the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure. (3) The deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed 15 percent of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than 30 feet, whichever is more restrictive. (4) The deck would be primarily wood, and not have a roof or screening. '\ Sec. 36 -573. Land Suitability. Each lot created through subdivision shall be suitable for development with minimal alteration. The City shall not consider lots suitable for development that would create any of the following effects: (1) Susceptibility to flooding (2) Filling wetlands (3) Building on soils with severe development limitations (4) Creating severe erosion potential (5) Building on steep topography (6) Inadequate water supply or sewage treatment capabilities 33 (7) Creating a loss of protected wildlife habitat �y Sec. 36-574. Planned Unit Development's (PUD s) . (a) "Suitable area" evaluation. The suitable area for calculating the density of a residential PUD shall be determined as follows: (1) The project site shall be divided into tiers. Tier boundaries shall be approximately parallel to the boundary of the public water at the following intervals, procee ding landward from the public water: Unsewered Sewered lu (feet) (feet) Class I and II waters- first tier 200 200 Class I and II waters- second and additional tiers 267 200 Class III and IV waters 267 267 Class V waters 400 320 All river classes 300 300 (2) The suitable area within each tier shall exclude wetlands, bluffs or drainage easements for storm water ponds. (b) Residential PUD Density Evaluation. The procedures for determining the base density of a PUD and density increase multipliers are below. Allowable densities may be transferred from any tier to any other tier further from the waterbody. Allowable densities may not be transferred to a tier closer to a waterbody. (1) To determine the residential PUD base density, divide the suitable area within each tier b the minimum lot size for lakes or the minimum nimum lot width times the tier depth for creeks. (2) Density increase multipliers: a. The maximum base densities may be increased if the proposed plan meets or exceeds the dimensional standards in Section 36 -566 and the other criteria in this section. b. The City shall allow the density increases in Item c. below if: 1. The developer increases the structure setbacks from the ordinary high water level to at least 50 percent greater than the minimum setback, or 34 2. The proposal reduces the impact on the public water an equivalent amount with vegetation, topography or other means acceptable to the City and the setback. is at least 25 percent greater than the minimum setback. c. Allowable density increases for residential planned unit developments: Density evaluation tiers First Second Third Fourth Fifth Maximum density increase within each tier (percent) 50 100 200 200 200 d. Regardless of the above, the density may not increase above the density allowed by the City's land use plan. (c) Open Space Requirements. Planned unit developments must contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. At least 50 percent of the total project area shall be open space. 2. The City shall not include dwelling units or sites, road rights -of -way or land covered by road surfaces, par king areas or structures as open space. 3. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities or water - oriented accessory structures or facilities 4. For residential PUD s, at least SO percent of the shore impact zone of existing developments or at least 70 percent of the shore impact zone of new developments must be preserved in its natural state. (d) Storm water management. Each PUD must have a storm water management plan consistent with the cites drainage plan and erosion control ordinance. (e) Centralization and design of structures and impervious surfaces. The following standards shall apply to PUD s: 1. On -site water and sewage systems must be centralized. 2. The plans shall cluster buildings and impervious surfaces to maximize open space. 35 30 The plans shall centralize shore recreation facilities. Shore recreation facilities shall include but not be limited to, swimming areas, docks.,_ watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps. The number of spaces provided for the regular beachin g, or docking of watercraft must not exceed one for each mooring g allowable dwellin unit or site in the Est tier (except existing mooring sites g an existin g Y commerciall used harbor) . The developer or owner may provide launching ramp facilities, including a small dock for loading and unloading e ui ment for use b occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers. q p � Y p g 4. The developer shall design structures, parking areas and other facilities to p � p .minimize their visibility (under summer conditions) from public waters and adjacent shorelands. This desig shall use vegetation, t.o ography, increased J � � p setbacks color or other means. The p lans shall use existing vegetative and too aphic screening as much as possible. The City may require additional p �' vegetation to help screen these facilities. 5. All accessory structures and facilities, except water- oriented accessory structures, must meet the required principal structure setback. The plans shall centralize all accessory structures and facilities. 6. The City may allow water- oriented accessory structures and facilities if they meet or exceed the design standards in Section 36 - 566. The plans shall centralize all :water- orientated accessory structures. Secs. 36 -575 36 -581. Reserved. SECTION 22. This section drops the definition of mining as follows: (I added a new definition in Section 36 -6.) SECTION 23. This ordinance shall take effect after the City approves it and the official newspaper publishes it. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on , 19950 36 Attachment 2 ARTICLE IX. SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT* Sec. 3&b61. Purpose and intent. (a) It is the purpose of this article to provide for the wise utilization of shoreland areas, in order to protect water ualit . al appeal of p rotected the natural characteristics and visa g y. waters. the local tax base, and the general health, safety and welfare of community residents. (b) Enactment of this article is rovide a ra anis P ai to reduce the negative effects of shoreland overcrowding, such as water Pollution, inadequate space on lots for dr ' e and ' facilities, flood food dam es �� �� a and degradation of the aesthetic appeal and natural characteristics of designated shoreland and a 'agent water areas. (Ord. No. 534, § I 1•24 -83) i5ec. 36 -662• blis ent of a shoreland overlay pct y (a) A shoreland overlay district, with its attendant regulations, is hereby established as part of the zoning ordinance. This dis- trict shall overlay existing zoning districts so that an in in � y parcel of Viand lying g the overlay district shall also lay in one or more of the underlying established zoning Aistr (b) Within the overlay district, all uses may be permitted in accordance with regulations for the underlying zoning district(s) if the uses meet the additional requirements established in this article. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1,1.24 - 83) Sec. 364 63. District boundaries. This overlay ordinance shall apply to the shoreland districts which are delineated on the official zoning maps. These shall be on file in the g ese ma p � � office of the director of community devel- opment for inspection and copying. (Ord. No. 534, 1 I 1 -24-83 • Cross reference— Enviromentai protection, 1 9- 1 k et seq. Supp. No. 9 2325 Sec. 3644. Definitions. (As used in this article, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them:) Average lot area: The average of the lot areas within a single development or phase. For a single lot, the minimum allowable area shall be no less than the average lot area requirement. Boathouse• A structure used solely for the storage of boats or boating equipment. Building of record- A structure which was in existence or for which a building permit was issued prior to (effective date of this article). Lot of record- A lot recorded with the Ramsey County register of deeds or registrar of titles prior to (effective date of this article). Multiple dwelling.- Any residential structure containing two (2) or more living units. 37 ZONING f 664564 Nonpoint source (NPS) pollutant: A contaminant that enters water by washing off the land or seeping into ground water, which alters the physical, chemical, or biological properties of water or the discharge into water of any substance that may create a nuisance or render such water detrimental or injurious to public health, safety or welfare. Nonpoint source (NPS) pollutant treatment; Storm water man- agement practices which will . reduce nonpoint source pollution prior to reaching a protected water. Ordinary high water mark (OHWAO. A mark delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the. landscape. The ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vege- tation, changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. Planned unit development: A development planned as a unit which incorporates: (1) Residential and commercial land uses, or (2) Variation(s) from this shoreland overlay article or under- lying zoning district regulations relating to, but not lim- ited to, density, setbacks, height limits and minimum lot area which are permitted by negotiated agreement between the developer, the municipality, and the commissioner of natural resources. Protected waters: Formerly referred to as public waters, means any water of the state as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.37, subdivision 14. Regional }food A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred in Minnesota and that can be expected to occur on an average frequency of once every one hundred (100) years. Shoreline Land abutting the ordinary high water mark. Shoreland Land located within the following distances from a protected water: . (1) One thousand (1,000) feet from the ordinary high water mark of a lake, pond or flowage; and (2) Three hundred (300) feet from a river or strea=m, or the landward extent of a floodplain on such a river or streann, whichever is greater. The practical limits of shorelands may be less than the statutory limits, where such limits are designated by the natural drainage divides at a lesser distance and approved by the department of natural resources. Structure: Any building, except aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph or gas lines, including towers, poles and other supporting appurtenances. Urban runoff. Storm water that flows over land or through a man-made drainage system, that usually contains litter, organic or bacterial wastes. (Ord. No. 534, 11 1-24-83) 38 Sec. 36 -555, Shoreland classifications. (a) Criteria for classification (percentages apply only to shoreland located in Maplewood): (1) Class I waters are defined as those DNR designated gen- eral development waters in which at least seventy-five (75) percent of the shoreland area is planned for commercial or industrial use, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan. (2) Class II waters are defined as those DNR designated gen- eral development waters not qualifying for Class I status. (3) Class III waters are defined as those DNR designated rec- reation development vaters having: a. At least sixty (60) percent of the shoreline in public ownership, or b. At least fifty (50) percent of the shoreland in public ownership, or c. Less than ten (10) percent of the shoreland remaining for development, excluding public. open space, as of (date this article becomes effective). (4) Class IV waters are defined as those DNR designated rec- reation development waters not qualify for Class III status. (5) Class V waters are defined as those DNR designated natu- ral environmental waters. (b) Classification o f protected waters: (1) Class I waters. 3M Pond Tanner's Lake (2) Class II waters. Battle Creek -Fish Creek. Gervais Lake (3) Class III waters. Casey Lake Keller Lake - Lake Phalen Silver Lake Spoon Lake Wakefield Lake (4) Class IV water& Carver Lake Kohlman Lake — • Oehrline's Lake w .� (5) Class V water& Beaver Lake Round Lake (Ord. No. 534, 1 1,1- 24-83) 39 Sec. 864b66. District development standards. (s) Class l waters With Sanitary Without Sanitary (1) Commercial development. Seiner Sewer a. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 50 b. Minimum on -site sewage system ;setback from OHWM (feet) 50 C. Maximum Impen►ioua surface area (percent) 50 50 With bonus (percent)* 70 (2) Multiple Dwelling. a. Minsmum building setback from OHWM (feet) 75 b. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 • With bonus (percent)* 60 (b) Class 11 and HI maters. (1) Commercial development. a. Maximum building height (stor- ies) 4 4 b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 75 C. Minimum water frontage (feet) 75 100 d. Minimum on-site sewage system setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 e. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 40 With bonus* Water fronta lots c t> so . Other lots (percent) 60 (2) Single dwelling. a. Minimum water frontage 75 100 b. Minimum building setback the OHWM (feet) With Without Sanitary Sanitary Sewer Sewer C. Minimum on -site sewage system setback from the OHWM (feet) 50 d. Average lot area water frontage lots (square feet) 15,000 20 (e) Maximum impervious surface area - - (percent) s0 With bonus* Water frontage lots ( percent) 40 Other lots (percent) 50 40 (3) Multiple dwelling. a. Mau building height (st ar- ies) 4 b. Minim boil ding setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 c. Minim water frontage per de- velopment (feet) 85 d. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 With bonus* Water frontage lots ant) 50 Other lots (percent) 60 e.. Average lot area per unit , :} � F Water frontage lots (square feet) 10 (c) Class IV and V water& (1) commercial development. a. Magiiauna buil ding height (stor- ies) 3 3 b. Minimum building from the OHWM (feet) 75 100 c. Bunn water frontage per de- velopment (feet) 75 150 d. mum on-site sewage System setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 With Without Sa nitary Sanitary Sewer Server e. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 30 With bonus* Water frontage lots t) 40 Other lots (percent) 50 (2) Single dwelling. a. Minimum water frontage and lot width at building setback dine (feet) 75 150 b. Minimum building from the OHWM (feet) 75 100 C. um on -site sewage system setback from the OHWM (feet) 75 d. Average lot area Water frontage lots (square feet) 20 40 Other lots (square feet) 15 40 e. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 30 s0 With bonus* Water frontage lots t) 40 Other lots (percent) 50 41 (3) Multiple dwelling. e. Maximum building height (atar- ies) $ b. Minimum building setback from the OHWM (feet) ?b C. M1I11a111II1 WStET �t8$@ per de- velopment (feet) 85 d. Maximum impervious surface area (percent) 40 With bonus* Water lots bo Other lots (percent) 80 With Without Sanitary Sanitary► Sewer Sewer e. Average lot area per unit Water frontage lots (square feet) 15,000 " %%-` Other lots (square feet) 5 *Refer to subsection 36.566(e) for requirements to qualify for an impervious surface area bonus. Impervious surface area limits shall be determined using the total developable area of a parcel (above the ordinary high water m. and suitable for develop- ment), exclusive of streets and sidewalks. (d) Roads and parking areas. (1) Roads and parking areas shall be designed and located so as to retard urban run -off. (2) where practical and feasible, all roads and parking areas shall sleet the structure setback standards from the ordi- nary high water marker specified in subsections 36- 566(a), (b) and (c). In no instance shall these impervious surfaces be located less than fifty (50) feet from the ordinary high water mark. : (3) Natural vegetation or other natural materials shall be used to screen parking areas when viewed from the water. (e) Impervious surface area bonus. To qualify for an impervious surface area bonus, as permitted in subsections 36.566(a), (b) and (c), significant man-made facilities shall be provided and main- tained for the reduction of storm water flow or the treatment of urban run -off for nonpoint source water pollutants. The director of public works shall determine whether a pro- posed management practice(s) is adequate to warrant a bonus using criteria adopted by the city council and approved by DNR. The criteria will be subject to revision from time to time taking into account the most recent technology. A bonus may range from one to twenty (20) percent for nonwater frontage lots and from one to ten (10) percent for water frontage properties, depen- dent upon the practice(s) proposed. The director of public works 42 shall forward a copy of proposed bonuses to the DN8 for review and comment. (fl Water quality management plan. (1) All development within a shoreland area shall be subject to a water quality management plan, which is to be ap- proved prior to construction by the director of public works, except single and double dwellings meeting the folio wing criteria: .a. The parcel is not part of a plat created after (effective date of this article). b. The parcel does not have frontage on a protected water. (2) A water quality "anagement plan shall include, but not be limited to, a statement of the construction and effective maintenance of nonpoint source pollutant treatment meth- ods to be used to reduce potential water pollution associ- ated with: a. Urban run -off, b. Soil erosion after construction is complete, and c. Soil erosion during construction. These methods shall be in addition to any significant man- made facilities proposed for an impervious surface area bonus as permitted by subsection 36- 566(e). (g) Elevation of the lowest floor. where no regulatory flood prot - elevation has been established, no stru p ,a• boathouses, piers and docks, shall be placed at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including basement, is less than three (3) feet above the highest known water level. In those instances ..,;,'. , t to where sufficient data on known high. water levels are not avail - '�3 ;, I m .. able, the ordinary high water ark shall be used. + ' ��2 ��^'� (h) Drain ag e. All devel o p ment within shoreland areas shall be ' � P oansistent with the intent of the Maplewood Drainage Plan, dated January, 1974. (i) Exemption from setback requirements Setback requirements from the ordinary high water mark shall not apply to boathouses, piers and docks. Location of piers and docks shall be controlled by applicable state and local regulations. (j) Reduction in development standard (1) where a shoreland property is: (a) separated from all pro- tected waters by a principal cr major arterial roadway, as defined by the Maplewood Land Use Plan, (b) the area does not drain directly to a protected water, and (c) the visual impact of the area from the lake surface is minimal, all applicable development standards may be reduced in re- strictiveness by one protected waters classification. (i.e., Property subject to Class III standards may be subject to Class II development standards.) (2) Not withstanding the maginaum building height require- ments in section 36 -566 (b) and (c), the maximum building height shall not exceed forty -two (42) feet from the street side for structures that would be at least eighty (80) per. cent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of a protected water during the summer. 43 (3) Minimum area- per -unit requirements in section 36- 566(c) shall not apply to developments that are at least eighty (80) percent screened from view from at least eighty (80) percent of the shoreline of a protected water during the sum- mer, do not have frontage or private docking facilities on a protected water and which comply with impervious surfave requirements. (k) Substan.dacrd lots and buildings. (1) Lots of record, not meeting the mium lot area require- ments of this shoreland overlay article, may be allowed as 8 building site, provided all other dimens I anal requirements of this shoreland overlay article are complied with insofar as practical. (2) A building of record, which is caused to be substandard due to the enactment of this article, may be expanded, provided that: a. The use and expansion are allowed by the zoning ordinance. b. Where practical and feasible, the improvements will not increase the substandardness of the building rela- tive to the requirements of section 36 -566, except as permitted in subsection 36.566(dx2)c, or c. The setback of the structure, if a water frontage lot, is the average setback of adj f: cent residential structures from the ordinary high water marker or fifty (50) feet, � whichever is greater. i (1) Boathouses. Boathouses may be allowed up to the OHWM provided: (1) They do not contain sanitary facilities. (2) They are not used for human habitation. (3) They are no larger than one hundred sixty (160) square feet in area and one story in height. (4) They are designed to be aesthetically compatible with the natural setting insofar as practical. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1, 1- 24 -83; Ord. No. 628, § 1, 7- 11-88) Sec. 36.567. Shoreland alterations. (a) Selective removal of natural vegetation shall be allowed, provided that sufficient vegetative cover remains to screen cars, dwellings and other structures when viewed from the water for aesthetic purposes. (b) Grading and filling in shoreland areas may be authorized by a grading and fill permit. Such permit may be granted by the director of public works, subject to the approval of an erosion control plan. At a minimum, an erosion control plan shall require that: 44 (1) The smallest amount of bare ground is exposed for a short a time as feasible. (2) Temporary ground cover, such as mulch, is used and per - manent ground cover, such as sod, is planted. (3) Methods to P revent erosion and trap sediazeat are employed. (4) Fill is stabilized to accepted engineering standards. (c) Excavation on shorelands where the intended purpose is connection to a protected water, shall require a permit from the director of public works before construction is begun. Permits may be obtained only after the commissioner of natural rewvwces has issued a permit for ' any work on the beds of protected craters. (d) Any work which will change or diminish the course, cur- rent or cross section of a protected water or wetland shall be .. approved by the commissioner of natural resources, and such .approval shall be construed to mean the issuance by the cor�amis- soner of natural resources of a permit under the procedures of Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.42 and other related statutes. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1 9 1-24-83) Sec. 366M. Onasite sewage treatment systems. (a) All on -site sewage treatment systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control A g e ncy Individual Sewage Treatment Systems S (6 MCAR 4.8040). (b) All ezisting sewage treatment systems inconsistent with the standards in subsection 36- 368(a) shall be brought into con - f e or discontinued within five (5) years from the date of en- actment of this article. Any nonconforming sanitary facil found to be a public nuisance shall be brought into conformity or dis- continued within thirty (30) days after receiving_ written notice from the Maplewood environmental health official. (Ord. No. 534, 6 1,1- 24-53) Sec. 864669. Plan review. (a) Subdivisions. (1) A11 plats which are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance shall be reviewed by the commissioner of natu- • ral resources. Such review shall require that the proposed plats be received by the eonamissioner at least ten (10) days before city council approval of a preliminary plat. (2) A copy of all plats within the shoreland overlay district shall be submitted to the oomrnissioner of natural resources within ten (10) days of final approval of the city council. (b) Planned unit developments (PUD). Altered zoning stand- ands may be allowed as exceptions to the coning ordinance for FUD's, provided that: 45 (1) Proposals must be approved by the department of natural resources prior to final approval by the municipality. The department of natural resources shall have thirty (30) days from the date of written notification from the city to reply, utter which time said proposal aball be considered approved. (2) Open space is preserved, that would not have been pre- served without the PUD. (3) Where a density bonus is considered, the following factors are evaluated to ensure the proposed density will be con- s stent with the resource limitations of the protected water: a. Physical and aesthetic impact of any increased density; b. Density of current development; C. Amount of public shoreland and shoreline; d. Levels and types of water surface use and public access; e. Possible effects on over -all public use of the protected water. (4) Any shoreline recreation facilities, such as beaches, docks and boat launching facilities ar.� centralized. (5) The developm is consistent with requirements for a PUD in the city zoning code. (6) An approved PUD shall not be modified unless approved in writing by the department of natural resources and the city council. The department of natural resources shall have thirty (30) days from the date of written notification from the city to reply, after which time, said request shall be considered approved. (c) -Multiple - family and commercial developments. Non- single- dwelling detached developments which would disturb at least one acre of shoreland, shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources for review and comment at least ten (10) days prior to community design review board approval. (d) Reduction of development standard& where standards would be reduced under subsection 36 -56N), notification of the request shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources at least ten (10) days prior to issuance of building permit or commu- nity design review board approval, whichever would come first. (Ord. No. 534, 1 1 1 1- 24-83) Sec. 36 -570. variances and amendments. (a) A copy of public hearing notices to consider variances and amendments to the provisions of this article shall be received by the commissioner of natural resources at least ten (10) days prior to such hearings. (b) A copy of final decisions granting variances or ordinance amendments shall be submitted to the commissioner of natural resources within ten (10) days of final action. (Ord. No. 534, § 1, 1- 24-83) Secs. 36- 571 -36 -581. Reserved. 46 i Planting Commission -3- Minutes of 9 -6 -94 The motion tossed. Commissioner bach moved that the Planning Commission submit the Commercial Property Stud the City Council for their review. Commissi ..''her Pe on seconded Ayes--all The emotion passed. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Shoreland Ordinance Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered questions from the Commission. The Commissioners discussed nonconformin g requirements uirements and q possibly adding height restrictions back into the shoreland ordinance. Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the ordinance revising Article K Shoreland Overlay District and Other Related Sections of the Code. Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes - -all The motion passed. It was decided that this item be submitted to the HRA for their consideration. VII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS There were visitor/presentations. VIII. COMM ISSION,PRESENTATIONS A. August 22 uncil Meeting: Commissioner Frost reported B. Represent five or the September 12 Council Meeting: Commissioner Kittridge C. Watershdd Committee Commissioner Rossbach gave a report and updated the Commission on the Phalen Chain of Lakes Watershed Committee. T -.3 MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Review PROJECT: Crestview Forest Townhouses LOCATION: Sterling Street, south of Mailand Road DATE: September 16, 1994 INTRODUCTION Action by Council: Endorse Modified Rejecte Date The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Crestview Forest Townhouses planned unit development (PUD) is due for review. (See the maps on pages 3 and 4.) BACKGROUND On May 15, 1980, the City Council approved the following for the Crestview Forest Townhomes: 1. A CUP 2. A preliminary plat subject to several conditions. Condition 5 said "Provide for the dedication of a 20- foot -wide easement and construction of a 10- foot -wide bike /pedestrian trail from proposed Sterling Street to the west property line. Location to be determined by staff and applicant." On September 23, 1980, the CDRB approved the building plans. On June 27, 1983, the City Council approved the following: 1. A two -year time extension for the Crestview Forest planned unit development. 2. A two -year time extension for the preliminary plat lying east of Sterling Street. 3. The Crestview Forest Second Addition final plat. Approval was subject to submitting a developer's agreement for construction of Sterling Street and the required trail, before the City signed the final plat. The developer dedicated a 20- foot -wide walkway new to the north line of the Crestview Forest Second Addition plat. (See the walkway location on page 4.) The developer never built the trail. On July 6, 1989, the City Council approved a five -year time extension for the Crestview Forest PUD. The extension was subject to the original conditions of approval. March 19, 1990, the Park and Recreation Commission moved that the Commission write a letter to the Crestview Forest Townhome Association to absolutely deny their request to. vacate the access (trail easement). On September 24, 1990, the Council moved "to delay action and directed staff to review the language of the conditions for the Crestview .Forest Addition and if there is no extension of the conditions to build the trail, bring it before the Council." On July 8, 1991, the City Council approved the final plat for the Crestview Forest Sixth Addition. The plat created thirty town house lots, and was the last phase of the project. DISCUSSION One of the CUP conditions requires that the developer build a trail to Vista Hills Park. The developer has built all the town houses but never built the trail. The purpose of this trail was to provide access to the park for the town house residents. In past discussions about this trail, the townhouse residents have been opposed to the trail being built. The Parks and Recreation Commission has been in favor of the trail. (See the former Park and Recreation Director's memo on pages 5 -12.) The City is no longer holding an escrow for the development. Therefore, the City may have to take legal action for the developer to build the trail. The previous developer was Marvin H. Anderson Construction Company. They have since been acquired by Pulte Homes. The options for the trail are as follows: 1. The City could construct the trail from park availability funds. The City Engineer estimated that the trail would cost about $5,000 plus tree clearing costs. 2. Do not build the trail. 3. Take legal action against the developer to get them to build the trail. (See the City Attorney's letter on pages 13 and 14.) 4. Take legal action against the town house association to build the trail. RECOMMENDATION Refer the question of whether to build a trail to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Request that they survey the town house residents to find out if the residents want a trail. go/b- 8:memo39.mem (12 -28) Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line /Zoning Map 3. Staff Report from Bob Odegard 4. City Attorney's letter Attachment I WA • 3 00 -0 LOCATION MAP 4 lb 4 16 +�. 1. HWMNGTON CT. 2. OAKRIDGE LA. 17 �' 1 - CURRIE CT. -2. VALLEY VIEWCT. 3. LAKEWOOO CT. ©. v • 3 00 -0 LOCATION MAP 4 A Attachment 2 VISTA HILLS PARK 0 0 (1) TRAIL � 1 0 Z SEE PLAT COPY FOR DETAILS FUTURE BETH HEIGHTS PLAT PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 4 3 C? 1 3 5 � 3 i t to T 15 s 7 Q .... C/) �" m h f O h IL 1 Am �' 1 0' 13 �s 7. 130 IQ fa Z3.7 3 23.77 .r • g�. (7) A 1 / 0 n o (4 ) ( ►� 35 35 3 s des �� K '0 9 h ` � � .S .� • � a7.3 �) �jr � bo 130..02: 4 0 j: RE 5 TVl W ' E v �` o e.'f -4 � X23 �,, g � 4 ;H? - i N 4 3 ` 32 J . 2 I � 3 z 3.4. Z Q' !► I d �S 2 r� 1 q'1 46 op I ro 026) 3 W - -------- - - - - -- ` 5`1 3� ?AIM 1 3 th. CIO " �� OUTLOT A r JS 1 2 3 4 12 ,�0 7/`°` ; 3 4 (1 42) X3 2 � 1 Z 3 g �, 4 3 1 0_ 3 4 N 0� , Z N 4 3 2 I ��. ,4► N V 3,, ....... 1 1 , s 33 47) as s ze o c ; 1 c C S� 130 1 � � P N D , 4 1 2 F ? CRESTVI �1 2� 92 Cq3� i �•; 24 - CR- �, 1EW FO Rt 3R A FOREST ,U TLOT % 73 a 4' L Al"�) PART OF COMMON ! v •',, e t ,,' AREA ` 3 9 PoN p 9 S 3 PoN 0 � J I W a 4 (53 � A W Q c34 Z 4 0 0 I 33 • U Z Orr v W ! C 1 H" W i "a l it s , 6 � a w CL 0 o. } Z M 0 Ca } w a F 4 N Attachment 3 MODVM To; Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Robert D. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreatio Subj:. Trail From Sterling Street To Vista Hills Park (2480 Mailand Rd.) Through Crestview Forest Townhomes Date: September 17 , 199 0 � v P--** i Introduction The City Council on Monday, August 27, tabled the discussion of the walkway from Sterling Street to Vista Hills Park through the Crestview Forest Townhome property to September 24, 1990o Backaround At the time of the acceptance of the Crestview Forest Townhomes development by the city, the developer (Marvin Anderson) agreed to install an asphalt trail from Sterling Street to Vista Hills Park between the First Phase and Second Phase developments. At this time, 32 units have been developed in the First Phase of the Crestview Forest Townhomes and 16 units in the Second Phase, which are all on the west side of Sterling Street. He also in- cluded in the 132 total proposed units for Crestview Forest, an additional 28 units in the Third Phase, which is now under development. The 300' trail under discussion is located between the First and Second Phase units and is approximately 200' wide on Sterling Street and 150' wide between the closest units. The area was previously reserved by Mary Anderson for this trail and should have been general knowledge to anyone purchasing a unit in the Crestview Forest development. The proposed trail would be screened from those in Phase I of the development by a thickly wooded area. The trail is to give access from Sterling Street into Vist Hills Park. Vista Hills Park is approximately 1285' along the north to south border with Crestview Forest. On the north end of the park is Mailand Road, which is 450' east to west, on the east side of the park is a trail 20' wide, which gives access from Marnie at approximately 600' from the north end of the park. On the south end of the park, another 20' wide trail gives access from Marnie into the park. The entire southern border of the park abuts homes. We anticipate that another entrance will come into the south end of the park off of Sterling, if and when the Beth Heights Addition is developed. The trail at the mid -point of the park off of Sterling is important, in that it gives access to the park for the owners of the 132 units that are in Crestview Forest as well as access to those who will be coming from the south and would prefer immediate access to the play equipment or tennis courts or play areas without coming through the trail system from the south end of the park. 5 Commission has discussed this trail upon The Park and Recreation on lion and this past March notified Mary Anders numerous occa s . , The f�.rml wish to have the walkway installed* that they still Y t is a part. of Commis ion considered the long -time commitment that p k as it may affect f uture res idents of the Cre access to a par Y t to the. -south . view Forest area as well as the. ent ire com mun i y , trails at Vista. Hills Park in the south end w ill The lower .loop • ' stee that so�ae handicapped challenge will have .additional p no t be able to handle, and thus a walkway from Ste rling would a ccess through the trails in the area that • more they can give them a g os- us es The concern by the Townhone Owners.that t here is P eak -ins b having this trail does not s eem realis- ,.bility of br . y g to steal a large appliance such someone is tic to me. If are g oing to take it imm e d iate ly as a TV, they g g out to their the same would vehicle in the street on Sterling and drive away, anyone burglarizing is not going to run through a be true of y g out into a ail buck into the park, • tr ail but rather immediately , ' l eave the p At the present time and in the veh icle and 1 p future there will be many vehicles owned by the many townhomes f ' sitors to those townhomes that are in the area, as well as visitors that wily make identification of any specific vehicle almost iimpossble. Recommendat Anderson recommended that the City Council require Marvin • It is wide trail i develop of the area, to immediately install an g� w P Hills Park as required n the from Sterling Street to Vista Hi original development agreement. mac: City Clerk 6 Page 7 3 t I •• ;• . 1 t . / •061 •� �. Ila OR • • • , i •• • . V , , • , • .' 1 •,, • . ..• •• f il l , A V v ow sp Iamb K ,� ••= 1 �' • , �i �� r�i� � '•� � / : j � � iii :� , ♦ • t � �. ��`_ •, // Hs •► w 'P IP ■ ON sp dip do- lb Sm — NIK mo W. •• A � N C3 r �� ♦�� Y � ! I f • �Maio 1 o ' i • i • 014 1 1 p o w l lb / �•• ' I ..i �� ; �,' �, •••. I •!. 10 .•'I' f r t • � � � :..fir � 1 1 ,� , �,• / � •• � i.. j �veu • •. j 40 Willi • ?t + • ,fi r ♦ j, .0 do to 410 top +•*• 'f �' 31 • .., i ; /�� /;' e do ,�' , ` N � • r•!• t •:•• ( j + ��. ii �/. "I� Ot t - w I / f / , • / / � v d1F 'o r abs *0 W,40 I f if 04 %Iqtqo 00 iv �� 1 �►;`� Vii'' /i• / ! �! l t • ` / /�Q� r • s ;v `'• ��� %% • •mow"' ��'� / I /// i t % �/ Or / ► M' s ; •• �� � l i % ' •'' �� j� ,� % •' � ♦iii / I ;.I +r io�. �I // f . t ; • , , ,� • _ or • do S %`MWm*b4, so am ism -W 40 IND d- 7fi • ~i•• �i a ��� • X7.0 ylr• / 1 a Now if led IN ff 0 04 do Zo Fo R' 5 F 0 • I • . , •, • •,, ��, t �,j e : 1, V IM 14 I o f do s o III moo / 01 i'� 0 m omma amm . o p 22 2 WI 1 000-10 #so or Z U — — ap "papdamp 00 00 111111!0!,11,11,111111 AL ov qb Z)e ve /e, Yr1 roe Pit 1/5 s ry MMLAN ROAD �. _ , _ ss -_ ....._.. – 1 �. — 1!i 0.1• M . —;,... ..i..• -- , Tir''! �.,R'L c.• SKI In+ amol f MOO opt toe t'.1 h.�' INY. o• S L NN, 00 to - w loo. "w7 - . rvi t — • • • • ow GOP 00 0 40M ow".4ft OP o. ol � / 1 r T IT i 11. 11 Of lop if /' wit \ �� _ s� � i1•a/ �/ G A OIL � , hEi K , p C S �• ,Z ' �� i IiNi i �• `• I tt M DA AIM ALTM / 'rr -.• /' \> _ �� OG Lw IIO�R MP ." ,4 OP Now -P r __- 10 le / /� / i 4 •�i , % op OV o of 00 ov do �io — t i lop do do 4_0 OV i b OF ov ow do ow, r y lop 41 .4 , ! , •' 1 •� 0 i ' op FP . 4f 10 00, / ' I ice ` , �op � �•� / / 4 1 i ' NOW 10 �Nft 11 , ' 'rte` , ��` ♦..r•� 1 • ## O le _ tt.. / _ I No, w1� +� + ' - -__ wort of � NIN 00 do. 4w Nb If ddo I - - NO � • Ad . � ' • �u • / , 1 • / .``•� // f x.11 �•/ � f • — i - ♦ , i I INN I op Awwo No 'ft I�� / ♦ / / / d 1 ♦ / 0 41 4op NOW dor &W NOW • - IC #0 dop 60 *we 40 de 10 OV dw all OP TRA it �♦ 1 i i I ♦ / �. OP OP do I AV op It p age 8 �� -'' ' - -' � .�'� ,- ,; . 40 p / �' i dor dO OP A 0 00 LIALAND ROAD we .. : i 00 : 0 0. _ is __.. . • �_ .L . J lop "M COUNK 0 t! � • ' • 0041 •' y • t : . `•' �.••••••�• •• ,I • 0000 0000 .•••. •, • • ' ' t 4. ..� ,.. ti . •� 1 0*110 40 It .. M •• , r. roc 1 ova + ' ' ! ! 1 J. r,. '.• • *Q- a., �O 4p " L -4: j •• • . 0 000' '•••••.......................•' : 00.00'•• 0 40 tee, .... ; •....... �, 000 •:• • • • . •• to . r-.•.� ---r-- ,-. ! . /� • ( I i ,' ��•• to ••' ' / f • •• 4100••' •'• Le. 0 %* •.. •... I •:�: ` �` •j ' �.i �� �� �� ��� i / ,.• 041 0 '• w• to wall • .• 00 .00 • • . •' ,r �„� ••. ... . • • • • mo /,. 41 41 •' :• •,.� `� • . '••.S• 0 0 . 0 0 • • t�. �' •• • • 00.0 � � •• • •' f • •• •••�. ...M• •.. • • `` • �� ` ; •• 0..000.• • ` •-•'•••••• ••1� omm� On- • ` : f�•. • j 0000•• � .00...00•• •• • i : • ; Po ' . � � . • .• . . • .. 41 0. 0 If Gob ' , ; • ; ! . %: • • . . • 0 ' SOP V. • '� �•• �r • • • +► 3 •. • Nr- •. O . ••1 i • • • • • . • . ti•' • / • ' 0•e-, 1 ` .,....... `sawwab J i •''•'.•''' •• • • • _ e i • V 1 S� , • •.• •• • A l a do �'�'- -- -- • f ; � FA ' ; 0 % _._.' _ -- .. «. 0 41 , •. _ • ~: . too * ** 4 ,•• ; • • • , f 0 410••• •, ••' ,•• �i 1 0 0 00• �• •��� • �� �� ST •' 0 •...• • t .••� .» A r ` • . • ,r •. 0 • ,t 0.0..0 •• ,�� 41• • • � •• • • 1' , `0000 '�ii� • �, i of .•V••.•. tr•• ��'•�� •rte •! �• � • • • . • � • • • �� �• �: i • • ' �. , ,•''•� • • • was ••'� • , 0 •. • • • S �•�r • ' ' • • • ` • . • .. ,� ` • • �•, 0100' 40000� ' .• t IOLUWGA IT •, OW `... .rte .t•..,.. �,..� • I •� , �t 9 we5 Pat t CITY OF 1 l A P IEWOOD 1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B riAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 DEPARTMENT 612- 770 -4570 PARKS AND RECREATION March 21, 1990 Mr. Frederic E. Haas Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co. 8901 Lyndale Ave. So. Minneapolis, HN 55420 Dear Air. Haas: The Park & Recreation Commission reviewed your letter and petition at its regular meeting, Monday, March 19. A motion was made to y absolutely den the request to vaca the e asement for the walkway into Vista Hills Park. It passed unanimously. The Commission felt that the walk .4ay from S terlini would make the trails more accessible to the part wheelchair users. Also, children wishing quicker area would use the walkway between the townhomese ma y not choose to go up to Mailand or down to the Forest for access* into the trails that is graded for access to the play Future residents south end of Crestview This walkway requirement by the City Council and. agreed to by � y was a re q Mary Anderson at the time of the development of Crestview Forest. Sincerely, �• l Rita Brenner Parks & Recreation Commission Secretary 10 MEMORANDUM To: Park & Recreation commissioners From: Robert D,. Odegard, Director of Parks & Recreation Subjt Trail To Vista Hills Park Through Crestview Forest Date March 15, 1990 Attached is a letter from Frederic Haas, Vice President Land Development. for Marvin Anderson Construction company, indicating that the Crestview Forest townhomes do not wish a walkway from Sterling into Vista Hills Park between the First and Second Phase of the Mery Anderson Development. I also have the petition signed by homeowners that will be available for the Park Commis- s loners Monday meeting. The 8' asphalt walkway from Sterling into Vista Hills Park was a requirement by the City Council and agreed to by Mary Anderson at the time of the development of Crestview Forest* I favor the installation of the trail for the following reasons 1) Development of access to a park is a long -term commitment. While present residents may not wish to enter the park, the future purchasers of the townhomes may prefer to have access through a walkway rather than having to go up to Mailand or dawn to the south end of Crestview Forest for access. Reality dictates that it is better to have a designated walkway than having people go through private property. 2) As the Beth Heights area is developed, which is south of Crestview Forest,, nany of the walkers will enter through the walkway at the south end of Crestview Forest. However, for those wishing to gain quicker access to the play area in Vista Hills, they will use the walkway between the townhomes. 3) The lower loop trails in Vista Hills Park in the south end will have more steepness than many handicapped challenged will be able to handle. Having a walkway from Sterling into the trails will make them more accessible to the trail that is .graded for wheelchair users. 4) If the Townhome Association is concerned that the walkway will infringe upon the south townhomes, I would recommend that they be encouraged to do additional plantings that could provide privacy blocking off the trail. The townhome to the north of the walkway already has a thick stand of trees. I recommend that the Park and Recreation Commission respond to the townhome owners through Mr. Haas as to the Commission's views on this walkway. 11 mare nderson BETTER HOMES F BETTER LIVING MARVIN M. ANOERSON CONSTRICTION COMPANY "01 LYNOALE AVENUE SOUTH. &$W*EAPOLtS. MINNESOTA SS420 March 12, 1990 TELEPHONE 881 -2661 � 37thi k , Anniversar Mr. Robert Odegard • Director of Parks M a p l e wood City H all 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Bob, Enclosed y ou w i l l find a copy of the Crestv.i ew Forest townhomes . deve lopments This plan shows the approximate l o c a t i o n of the proposed walkway. Enclosed also is a petition which I received last week from al l of the owners of our townhomes indicating that the wish not to have.the walkway installed. If the residents in the townhome area have no desire for the walkway, then I feel also that it would serve no purpose. Those s i n l.e family 1 y res i dents living to the north of these private 9 townhomes can enter the park from Mai 1 and Road.. The single family homes to the south can enter from the south end of the parks The majori of the property to the east is private and . i t would be better to keep the pedestrian traffic to a minimums Pl ease consider this peti tion and make me aware of any comments or meetings as soon as possible, Sincerely, MARV A SON HOMES Frederic E. Haas Vice Pres. Land Development F E H :*w enc. 12 Attachment 5 B gan Kelly,_ A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W 1750 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 JOHN F. BANNIGAN, JR. PATRICK J. KELLY JAMES J. HANTON JANET M. WILEBSKI JOHN W. QUARNSTROM August 9, 1994 Mr. Geoff Olson 18 1 1_3',�± Count)' ucoad B Maplewood, MN 55109 Dear Mr. Olson: (612) 224 -3781 FAX (612) 223 -8019 Please be advised that I've. reviewed your staff draft memo concerning Crestview Town Houses. We should discuss the following issues: 1) It is my understanding that the developer entered into an agreement for the construction of the trail. If that is the case, then the City has an action against the developer for a breach of contract. 2) It is my understanding that the PUD is subject to review. There should be a clarification that the trail is a part of the PUD and if not constructed then in that event, there maybe additional problems concerning renewing the PUD. 3) The CUP condition requires that the developer build a trail to Vista Hill Park. I disagree with the term, " The City no longer has any leverage to require the developer to build the trail ". I believe our discussion with the proper documentation could support a litigation claim against the developer for the following to it: 1) Breach of contract 2) Enforcement condition of PUD 3) Enforcement condition of CUP 1.3 Mr. Geoff Olson Page Two August 9, 1994 The cost for this type of litigation would be rninimum. Respectfully yours, N ICjAN &KELLY, P.A. trick J. K 11 PJK:ol 14