HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 07-25 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, July 25, 1994
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 94 -15
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council /Manager Workshop of July 5, 1994
2. Minutes of Council /Manager Workshop of July 7, 1994
3. Minutes of Meeting 94 -14, (July 11, 1994)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA. PRESENTATIONS
F. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City
Council and w i l l be enacted by one motion. There w i l l be no separate discussion on these
items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Donations to Nature Center
3. Conditional Use Permit Review: 586 Carlton Street (Kinderberry Hill Day Care)
4. Financing for Projects 93 -08 and 93 -14
93 -08: Sterling Street /Valley View to Linwood
93 -14: Searle Street Storm Sewer
5. Financing for Project 94 -06, East Shore Drive Storm Sewer
6. VEM Budget Adjustment - Hydraulic Lift Cleanup Costs
7. Salaries for Selected Community Center Positions
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. 7:00 P.M.: Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility
Alley Vacation
Zoning Map Change (4 Votes)
Parking Waiver
Floor Area Variance
Density Variance
Building Plans
2. 7:15 P.M.: Floor Area Variance (Rosewood Estates)
3. 7:30 P.M.: Bittersweet Estates
Land Use Plan Change (4 Votes)
Zoning Map Change (4 Votes)
Street Vacation - Flandrau Street West of Bittersweet Lane
Removal of "No Trespassing Signs"
Street Vacation - Flandrau St. East of Bittersweet Lane (4 Votes)
Preliminary Plat
f � �a I rA Oki Z�
I.
1. Project 94 -09, Bituminous Overlay
2. Community Center: Purchase of Weight Equipment
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Appointment Procedure
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Parking Waiver: Crown Plaza Shopping Center (Palm Night Club)
2. Mounds Park Academy
Code Interpretation: Parking Lot Lighting
Fencing Request
Conditional Use Permit Review
3. Community Center: Contract for Interior Landscaping
4. Community Center: Computer System,
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Open Space Progress
2.
3.
N. ADJOURNMENT
s. CITY COUNCIL/MANAGER WORKSHOP
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
4:34 p.m., Tuesday, July 5, 1994
Maplewood Room, City Hail
MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room,
City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 4:32 p.m. .
B. - ROLL CALL
Mayor Gary Bastian Present
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach Present
Councilperson Dale Carlson Present
Councilperson Mary Koppen Present
Councilperson George Rossbach Present
Others Present:
City Manager Michael McGuire
Director of Public Safety Ken Collins
Fire Services Consultant Bill Bruen
C. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be approved as presented. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Rossbach and was approved.
Ayes: ' All
D. UPDATE ON FIRE DEPARTMENT NEGOTIATIONS
City Manager McGuire presented an --update on the negotiations with the two fire departments,
Parkside and East County Line. Mr. Bill Bruen discussed the pros and cons of the City's options for
fire protection services and future concerns such as day time coverages and capital purchases.
Following considerable discussion, Councilmember Koppen moved that this discussion be continued
1
until Thursday, July 7, 1994 at 5:00 - p.m. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Carlson
and was approved.
Ayes: All
E. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no OTHER BUSINESS
F. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5:33 p.m.
2
CITY COUNCIUMANAGER WORKSHOP
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
5:00 p.m., Thursday, July 7,1994
Maplewood Room, City Hall .
MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City
Hall.. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 5:00 p.m.
B. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gary Bastian
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Councilperson Dale Carlson
Councilperson Mary Koppen
Councilperson George Rossbach
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Others Present:
City Manager Michael McGuire
Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich
Director of Public Safety Ken Collins
City Attorney Patrick Kelly
D. CONTINUATION OF UPDATE ON FIRE DEPARTMENT NEGOTIATIONS
City Manager McGuire distributed material from Mr. Bill Bruen about fire department negotiations, a
draft of a letter for City Council to send to residents concerned with fire department negotiations, and
a draft of a memo of understanding between the City and the fire departments that may become part
of the final contracts. There was also a discussion about 3M's dissatisfaction with the East County
Line Fire Department's response time and their request to contract with the City of St. Paul for fire
protection. Following considerable discussion, Councilmember Carlson moved that the Citv
Manager and Mayor be authorized to sign the agreement between 3M. City of St. Paul, and City of
Maalewood for St. Paul to provide fire protection services for 3M. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Allenspach and was approved.
Ayes: All
E. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no OTHER BUSINESS
F. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
K
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, July 11, 1994
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 94 -14
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian,
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Co. ROLL CALL
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present
Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson, Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Meeting 94 -13, (June 27, 1994)
Mayor Bastian. to approve the minutes of Meeting No. 94-13 (June 271L
1994)_ as presented.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
L - 1 RCLLG Picnic
L - 2 County Road C
L - 3 Mayor's Update
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
EA. PRESENTATIONS
NONE
7 -11 -94 1
0
F* CONSENT,AGENDA
Councilmember Carlson moved, seconded by Councilmember Kopper ayes - all,
to approve the Consent Agenda, items.F -Land F -2 as. recommended.
1 Approval of Claims
Approved the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 513,535.50 Checks # 2654 - # 2756
Dated 6 -16 -94 thru 6 -30 -94
$ 176,356.25 Checks #14073- #14193
Dated- 7 -11 -94
$ 689,891.75 Total per attached voucher /check
register
PAYROLL: $ 244 Payroll Checks #41421 thru #41624
Dated 7 -01 -94
$ 48,840.72 Payroll Deduction Checks # 41629 thru
#41645 dated 7 -01 -94
$ 273 Total Payroll
963 .59.4.66 GRAND TOTAL
2. Balloon Sign: 2550 White Bear Avenue (Pet Clips)
Approved a ten -day sign permit for Pet Clips to have an advertising balloon
sign on the roof of 2950 White Bear Avenue subject to the following
conditions:
1. The sign shall be no taller than eighteen feet above, the top of the
parapet.
C
20 The sign shall meet the City's requirements for temporary signs.
6.- PUBLYC HEARINGS
1, 7:00 P.M. (7:05 P.M.): Truck Utilities (2370 English Street)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a
conditional use permit and design review for Truck Utilities &
Manufacturing at 2370 English Street North.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
d. Commissioner Kittridge presented the Planning Commission Report.
e. Baardmember Robinson presented the Community Design Review Board Report.
7 -11 -94 2
f. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following person was heard.
Leo Capeder, Truck Utilities
g. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
Conditional Use Permit
h. Councilmember Koppen i. troduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
94 -07 -79
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, Mr, Leo Capeder of Truck Utilities and Manufacturing, Inc.
applied for a conditional use permit to expand a motor vehicle paint shop.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2370 English Street. The legal
description is
Except the North 204.7 feet, the following: Except the West 433
feet, that part lying North of Highway 36, of the West 19 acres of
the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4, Section 10, Township 29,
-
Range subject to road and easements.
AND
The South 200 feet of the North 404.7 feet of the West 433 feet of
the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 11/4, Section 10, Township 29,
Range 22, subject to road.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. On June 20, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve this permit.
2. On July 11, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The
City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to
the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone.at
the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements.
The Council also considered reports and recommendations of the
City staff and Planning Commission,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described conditional use permit, because.
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and Code of Ordinances,
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of
the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
7 -11 -94 3
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -
off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference
or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access
on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, water and sewer, systems, school s and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
89 The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the
City. The Director of Community Development may approve minor
changes.
2. The ro osed construction must be substantially started within
P P
one Y ear of Council approval or the permit shall end. The
Council may extend this deadline for one year.
3. Truck Utilities shall require that their employees not park on
the lot across the street unless on a paved parking lot. The
City.must approve any plans for paving a parking lot.
4. On -site parking shall be kept free for employee and customer
parking.
5. The City Council shall review this permit in one year.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
Site Plan and Building Elevations
i. Councilmember Koppen moved_ to approve the site plan and building
elevations (stamped April 7. 1994) for Truck Utilities based on the
findings required by the Code. The applicant shall do the following:
1. Repeat this review in two years if the City has not issued a
building permit for t h i s project.
2. Before the City issues a building permit, submit a revised site
plan for staff approval. This plan shall show at least 15 more
paved and striped parking spaces.
7 -11 -94 4
3. Complete the following before occupying the building:
a. Screen any new roof mounted equipment visible from
streets or adjacent (code requirement).
b. Stripe the existing parking spades.
c. Add 15 more paved and striped parking spaces on site.
The applicant shall add additional on -site parking
spaces if it becomes necessary.
d. Install - site lighting around the proposed addition,
subject to the approval of the Director of Public
Safety.
4. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary
occupancy if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to
the public health, safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable 1 etter
of credit for the required work. The amount shall be
150% of the cost of the unfinished work.
c. The City receives an agreement that w i l l allow the City
to complete any unfinished work.
5. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of
Community Development may approve minor changes.
6. Remove the old equipment on the east side of the site and clean
the grounds.
70. The west - elevation design submitted at the Community Design
Review Board meeting on June 28, 1994 is approved. This is the
sketch labelled Elevation B.
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
H. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Bids For Used City Vehicles
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Carlson moved to accept the bids as. presented in the
Agenda Report dated Julv L 19949
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
7 -11 -94 5
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Home Occupation License: Shannon Kimball (1652 Lakewood Drive)
a. Manager McGuire stated that Shannon Kimball, 1652 Lakewood Drive, has
withdrawn his request.
b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter, The following were heard:
Noel l a Buchmayer, 1616 Lakewood Drive (Staff recommended she
call PCA.)
Deb Brown, 1617 Lakewood Drive
Kevin Kittridge, Planning Commissioner
C. The Maplewood Ordinance states that if no clients come to the person's
(Mr,. Kimball) home then a permit is not necessary.
d. Councilmember Carlson mm- to direct staff review the Home Occupation
Ordinance, Chapter 17.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued)
2. 7:20 P.M. (7:34 P.M.): East Shore Drive Storm Sewer, Project 94 -06 (4 Votes)
a. Mayor Bastian convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding the
East Shore Drive Storm Sewer, Project 94 -06.
b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
c. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for the public hearing.
d. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
e. Mayor Bastian opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or
opponents. The following persons were heard.
Bob Evans, 1852 Adele Avenue
Doug Holmberg, 1858 East Shore Drive
Paul Koreen, 1866 East Shore Drive
Jan Steiner, 1876 East Shore Drive
f. Mayor Bastian closed the public hearing.
g. Mayor Bastian moved to table t h i s item and direct staff to meet with the
neighbors an_ d report back at the August 8, 1994 Meeting_
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
H. AWARD OF BIDS (Heard after G -1)
E
7 -11 -94 6
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (continued)
1. Home Occupation License: Shannon Kimball (1652 Lakewood Drive.) - Heard after G -1
2. Northwood Village Drainage
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian moved to table. t h i s Item unt i l the July 25. 1994, , Meet i.ng,_,
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. 1994 Overlay Program, Project 94 -09
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b.. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Koppen moved to approve the Overla-v Program, Project
94 -09, as outlined in.the Agenda Report dated July 1, 1994.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
2. Backhoe Replacement
IK
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Carlson moved to approve acquisition of a reel_ acement u n i t
as requested in the.1995 budget proposal.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
3. Recycling Center Cost
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson presented the specifics of the
report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council,
regarding this matter. The following was heard:
Sue Stanich, Bellaire Sanitation
d. Councilmember Carlson moved to revise the contract for the remainder of
1994 with Bellaire Sanitation to pay them $50 De ton _of material thev
haul , and pay, J R's Appliance Disposal, Inc. $7 Der ,agpl i ance and
authorize the Director of Finance to pay costs for removi ng
materials from the recycling centers. The money shall come from the
unappropriated fund balance 1n the recycling fund. The operation will
be reviewed at the end of the contract period.
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
7 -11 -94 7
4. Proposed Settlement - LELS Local 173, Sergeants
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Human Resources Director Le presented the specifics of the report.
C* Councilmember Carlson moved to approve the proposed settlement, LELS
Local 173, Sergeants., as set forth in the Agenda Report dated ,July 1,
1994.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
5. Charitable Gambling Request
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Don Weigert, President of Heritage Theatre Company, Inc., explained the
request.
c. Councilmember Carlson moved to the request from the Heritage
Theatre Company for charitable gambli ng, proceeds in the amount of $7,500
for egui Wit_
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
6. Open Space Site
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Carlson moved to direct the Parks & Recreation Commission
and the Planning Commission to review the proposed acquisition as
separate parcels as soon as pOssi.ble; and direct staff to return on the
August 8. 1994 meeting with the Commissions' recommendations for Council
formal consideration of the purchase.
- I ICI
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
NONE
L COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. RCLLG Picnic
a. Councilmember Rossbach reminded the Council of the Picnic to be held on
July 20, 1994.
7 -11 -94 8
2. County Road C
a. Councilmember Rossbach moved that County , * Road C speed limit be
establ fished as 30, miles per ho_
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
3. Nayor Update
Mayor Bastian stated that:
a. An Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Breakfast will be held on
July 14, 1994 at 7:30 A.M. for the Council to discuss various issues.
b. There will be a Workshop of the Tri City Environmental Group on July 15,
1994 at the St. Paul Community Center from 9:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon.
c. He had a discussion with Ramsey County regarding the indoor golf range.
d. Councilmember Koppen will be the Grand Marshall of the 1994 White Bear
Avenue Parade. The Council will join him.
e. Mayor Bastian thanked Pauline Staples for the great job as Acting
Director of Parks and Recreation and also for the terrific job on the
Fourth of July celebration.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Open Space Progress
a. Assistant Manager Maglich gave an update on the progress of Open Space
and asked the Council if staff should look beyond the 19 adopted sites
for more open space.
N. ADJOURNMENT
9:20 P.M.
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
7 -11 -94 9
AGENDA NO. F -1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Finance Director
RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE: July 18, 1994
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
$ 687,865.90 Checks # 2757 thru # 2811
Dated 7 -1 -94 thru 7 -13 -94
$ 414r222-03 Checks # 14201 thru # 14339
Dated 7 -25 -94
$1,102,087.93 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 229,052.06 Payroll Checks # 41455 thru # 41661
Dated 7 -15 -94
$ 48.512.29 Payroll Deduction check # 41666 thru
# 41681 Dated 7 -15 -94
$ 277,564.35 Total Payroll
$1,379,652.28 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
Iz
Attachments
FINANCE /APPRUM.AGN
.
2.766 780c"100 0 7 0 1 4 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT PROGRAM SUPPLIES 5 6' 3 56, , 6 3
Z 5
07 0 1 4 CELLULA 0 N E:
TELEPH 0 N E
7 1
TELEPH Q N
I Ir in u ,. 11 1
Ze 7 8 12032to 07/01/514 CELLULAR ONE T E L 1--'P H C-i N E 84.951 .:,4, 47
48
f) F 49
9
2769 1 90400 07/01/94 PT O F NA TURAL r r R 0 U RES' ES *DNR LICENSE P B L 61 8 6 0 0
50
51
_ 7 I QT1 LL l tj E: I I E:f C" Z: rt I T p t:� V, I
A Ch fi- -f i 7 1 irk i I Q A U A 'T 110 A I : T% lk I r- 521
41 2771
140400
07/01/94
CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT
CNFY DRIVERS LIC.
30.50
30.50
- Q
55
42
56
43
2772
44
5541400
07/01/94
M 1414 STATE TREA',;W-RER
S T A717 E DRI VEF(S L I C
68 1 ':00
>
57
58
59
45 2, 7- 7- 2-
1541400
07. 0 1 9 4
M 1 WN —.8 YATE TR&AGURFER
M i--4 T- f-1 R VEH -L-1 G
a 2-- .6 8--:s 4 1.1
2 2 6 8 4 6
60
46
5
61
47 2774
48
5 X001 5
07 x'01 4
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
MAILING 1-'EES
8 8 .
88.46.
62
63
64
49
2 7 7 55
50
07i0l/94
GROUP HEALTH I NC
HCMA DEDUCT PAYL
4 0 46
65
66
HLTLH L IFE DENT AL I NS
14, i�.
67
51
52
69
53 Z776
6 0 100
07/01/94
MEDICA CHOICE
HCMA DEDUCT
118.50
70
71
54
55
72
73
56
INSURANCE CONTINUA14CEL
-50
T 5
17 C
1 8c 6 . 00
74
75
57 2
4
A]DM-4-fF-E- tii -
j � 6 C4
76
F --
im
VOUCHREG
CITY OF MAPLtW? CID
PAGE 2
k :
w 48
- E - S - E f
`1
FOR PERIOD 07
2
3
4
CHEC
VE14D
CH
VENDOR
I EM
ITEM
5
C:HEC:K 6
NU IVILER
N UMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT 7
-- __
.8
.2778
542305
07/01/94
MINN MUTUAL LIFE INS
HCMA DEDUC7 TC.N
� �Cl . ��
9
10
L !NS
47 9. 4 0
1,
, j
12
13
A/R INSURANCE
9
�
i y �� e � Y 7 :� 14
15
A
f 9 9. ; -
16
r 17
18
275-40
t�`�c��� 26
01/05
BRAI�DOCK I DAV I �S
J ULY �4 TH PROGRAM
�:��� a �:�0
�G� � {�. 19
...y.....
.r......._....r..
..............._W.�.— ......_...�
.__._._.......y..._.. y.. ....v....v.y..
�.. ........_. �_ .. ...._._ y....v....... u... y.._...._... u... �....._. _ . y. .. . w_..._ ....._..._. ..._......W..._....._...W_.
20
» 7t 1
7 20 7 6 8
0
PR E M I ER BA14K
F r I r C r A a
10 8 a :�
21
22
F I Y TAX PB L_,
;�.�, `�,:; d 7
23
F f C-- A • tWf �� -T-�f
y '" r
- 24
1 -5 6 0 r 25
26
2
541L
'�
� � J tJ �.1 / �i �
M INN. t't L 1 �1 i V r STATE t1 I E Tt � 1 � Cz G M �.» 1 �1 t
� G. �'" �, [t) ! � � COMPS M f ti
�
r r {.J
• 1:1 27 e7
. . 28
2783
010190
07/05/94
A.F.S.C.M.E. 2725
WORKERS COMP.
9.40
29
9.40 30
31
34
2
5 4140 0
0 7/06 /9 4
MINN. S TREAS
MO VEH LIC.
119,098.25,
98 r ;Z!�j 35
36
2
5 t3t 6 50
0 4
M
_ _
STATE TO FE
�.,�.� {�
37
L, �Jt�� .�a �1 38
39
2. C-1 7
510100
07/06/94
MAPLE LEAF" OFFICIALS ASSN,
S . r
9 C61
» 0
41
: ;
42
2
7405500
0
R. J . TET Z L OF F 81 S ON
G E
i , EJ 00 . 0
43
1.14 T -E.R-r--- .S.T-.. # 1
- 18 .
a4
45
46
2 , 789
Z 7 0 1 90
0
F INE LI HOMES
GRA REFUND
11000.
47
� E�,t p . , RO W
�TT�fT�R - E S T N E S G f'*»Tp
r• Y 48
49
2' 7 90
510605
0 7/06/94
MAPLEW D
GRADING E SCROW
i � C.l� . 0C!
50
51
.
- w
REFUND ON G E SCROW
1 9 000 . 00
53
54
INTERE ON ESCROW
18.77
55
56
57
INTEREST O N . ESCROW
ti's Y 7 0
.026 Y 17 58
59
♦
97 -91
. + W ► .�y w » + ... �w �
�1 f 1... Lfi�i •,.,•{- 11»........r... ..........
,, ». ,
... ... - ....._.- .._...._.,._.:..... l u •.J I`l —W YI.r 4 fY��MY �� _ .. ...
,L,.. - � a M-� ; - y } y �- W -{� 1e��-
- .. ' ;r4 r;. M. «... —:. ....
.. .... 60
..:.:. ..
IN ON E S C•R O
7 . 95
1, 0C! r 9 62
63
2792
r
..
_�77�t
`
64
I O N ES CR OW
9
l ow ,► �,
65
1 � �� a p hi 66
",
67
.,�. .".�
�`.._ ...".;.. "..'5.�..",� +�
�7�T�� � T
�' i � �TT_* ...., 1'[ Vl" �TT. �' �' II��""
���� ..... _ ......... _ , _ ...,..........., _ . _ .. ..,. � , �:�:�_ . 1�T� .., _ .. :� 'i. �L. i�'
,..; -� �. -."�.� n �..�"...._....
68
•
_
SUR RETAINER
J ��
h� � r f �ti'.�
69
.
•».� � 17 70
'-
5 41400
0 ' r
4wTZ -fik E •t» R E A S t t E R
TTT»T +YE'TTIN K
r-. E .- 72
X7 96
5 31 6 7 El
0
METZ THE R ESA
SE PAY CHECK 71 25 2 F' R
� 6 e R
74
0 75
_ __.._.. _ �.
_......
_..
76
VOUCHREG
CITY OF MAPLE WOOD
PAGE
.F 1..'.1�
'f» M: 1 -. ......,.....
.......................-..--......................................,............
>.........,._.....,.....- .....f :: . ' `4rIw. �.•. iw \+' 1 . . • 1 4w. i.i 1.1 1 4.. 1. - ,..•.........., ..,........_...........• ... ..................«........
:. ..,...
:.
2
' 3
3
.
4
4
voueH
CHECK
VE14DOR
CHECK
VE14D 1_iH ITEM
ITEM
5
CHECk' 6
5
NU I'�1DER
14UPIBER
DATE
NAME D E SC:R IPT I �N
AMOUNT
AMIOUNT 8
6
2 :796
.M !1
�� !` C1 ca
MI 1 1�11�1 �S TATE TRE ly1 �1 i' 1..� R V:1-# >. , F`,�1 Y' A� 1..
,. .,ti Lt +.
9
�„� �''� �t N . �, ,� 10
8
_
11
9 �r
12
1 U
nor _
T. O F N A{ ��� t_. J i0.� :-
3 ,..�► 2.
: b c.. 0 13
11
; 798
1 tic: ►400
07/ 08/94
DEFY. . OF 14AT URAL RESOURSES D14R LICENSE FEES F'AY'AI:.'LE.
10 .00
14
1C► r 00 15
12
16
13
14
2799
941`00
07/08/94
WIARD, BILL ENTERTAINMENT JULY 4TH
�4 t »D��'
' 17
��5 M(��� 18
19
15
.. 8 ft---
-+ 3
E M A R I E -" - E` FOR Y •
M M
S 20
r
16
L
_• w•
`• 21
17
22
Z -
53
07
ME FRO RO WASTE CONTROL COM M I SN MAY SAC
16". .1000.00
23
18
cz 24
4
19
IA .. 25
20
21
Z8D-
661'(50
07 /08/94
NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILI TIES 217
3 w '�
26
27
28
��
+E S
3.
22
2�, ,
UTILITIES 15
1.14
29
30
24
UTILITIES 1600
4.72
31
- - -----
------
.i°
,�
25
UTIU IT IES 2�Lr•;•'�,
4 �40:
33
34
26
z7
UTI :. 5 10 0
:�„ 1+'�.
35
L ,..
3.14
28
UTILITIES 2050
9 .T4
37
38
29
U 'T I L I i _ I E. 1902
1
39
3o
91 � .
�0
31
32
uTILITI 1 i
7 . 7
1
42
33
_ _
laT 1 ! IES 1 457
7 :�7''
43
Q i -(is 9 e ` _
tMt
44
34
UTILITIES 1751
y
151.42
45
46
35
U T I L I T I E S 1 839
c, si 97
47
36
1
48
38
UTILITIES 1850
140.6 3
50
UTI i I ES ! 9
160 »0
51
39
Li f 1-17 1 *f 1 17-
_ :...
t 47 9
r 4..
40
41
UTIL I Y I Z 2 61
1
54
UTILITIES 2 Z 71*•
134.
55
42
43
:-
44
..UTILITIES 5 ?25
�•.!
s8
UTIL I T IB Z 5 1
1156 w3
59
45
46
47
U 1 695
1 1 3 8 0.8 9
61
62
UTILITIES 1695
63
50
I.► T I L I I E S Z 5 f U
. t i . f .�.�
'«•; . �A `•� 66
67
51
.30
437 i08/94
_
-SEWER SE ULY 94
"�'�
1 •
��
't'
! 69
53
70
2', 4
x'80 f 5
0
T I —Cx UId i Y LAW E.14 RCEMIEII ! MI E IF'
45.
45 71
54
........
..._,_..m..,.
.___,..m_,__.
.._..._...._ ...__.�- ... �,........ �.. �._..�. �......_. . _, �w ._._....__.._...__.____.._.. _.__......__.. .�._...__,..._. ..._.� .� ...._.. ._._............_.._ _._., T..,..........__. �^.. .......r...._._..r...........
._..._..� .......,.�..............,_.,_
72
55
zp( 5
..`` ,`{�(r•�'
5541400
i i lI e .... tF , _ 1 ....._.._...
0 i f 4
I _....._ EES PA I
MINN. tY ��REASURER MIO � QR YEH LI t� PAYABLE
."i [ !..� rir�.1
•� ! 4 �f . 73
�3 t 10 Z5 74
56
75
57
_ -.�
- _ -- • �; (i h -..___
_N•- r.,3� --
- - --�- �1 -k w '.$ -' - --
At 1 +�' # u�= �# �►1_. _,.._a.- -�i EJ.# L: _ �.__....__ ._. __._... __.. - - 1 °i:..�. _x '__r.. L..� - _, =• _ , - -- - __ - -- ____.._.__ _�._._
__ .._;.___�.
76
-- '- --- -' ---- -- --- ----- --- - - - - -� r
a
VOUCHREG
6
CITY' O MAPL.EWOOD
RAGE 4 F/8
r
:3 8
- --
- ftr' hF �f --ftE W +ft
2
FAR PERIO 07
2
3
3
4
4
5
•
5 CHECK
VE14DOR
CHECK
VENDOR
I T E M
ITEM
CHECK 6
NUMBER
NU
DATE
NAME
DE CR IF`TI ON
AMOU14
AM
6
g
$
U t ILIT*IP:S A �;
1�t.7
10
UTILITIES 615
7.46
11
13
10
t1
_
UTILITIES 1 6185
2 7. 80
14
UTILITIES 1810
22.01
15
12
—
17'
13
UTILITIES 18215
7114
1$
UTILITIES 184
���:3 r5L�
19
15
w ..
20
•
16
17
UT i r lES 1
r - 1 -1
U,8 )
22
LlTI 2 0 01
El4 9
23
S --- e6,
w �- w
19
20
,
r.. 1 »
U T I L I T E �� t.. 11;
7 1 r`#
r
25I
26''
..�
UTILI I I ES 2
M 1 :`
2$
22
2s
UTIL S 2 6 ". 9
208 .89
3 0
UTILIT IES 2 65 9
Z1 .17
31
24
--
J . T 1 E , .
a ..
25
26
UTILI'IE5 474
�4..1� » t��
33
34
UTILITIES 10 35
290 a�'���.'..
35
27
W �.l 9
p"
36
28
29
U T I L I T I E S 1
�}
1 r Z6
37
3 8
UTILITIES 1882
173. <<0
39
30
- t-- ----;t- 9 4 +----
4 E - a
40
3 1
32
U 1 I L I T I E w—►
_
41
42
UT�LI 1 I.SD
a
43
33
_ : - �- ....a._...... " :.. -:
: ..:.. ..... ...........................1.7 1 , � �4 .L ��i L.. V W L.. L �� W
[l. »
44
34
35
UTIL'I r IES 2146
1:� .
45
46
UT ILIT I ES 2 740
1 •e.tl
4 , .::66 .41 47
36
48
37
7.507
3$
90OZ74
OT/12/94
U ITED WAY` OF tHE ST PAUL
7— ND QTR �.9 4
; >.
���
49
8 :3 � s��3 5
39
w
..
-- TTY��. -
S Y
_.... -. -... GT`I T��HL 1' ► - T L
. �.. r »
w r L 4
40
-
..
53
41
54
2 .909
18 0960
0T 1 3 9
DA H GI A
REF UND GRADI ES CRWO RE 7 96
1
55
42
;- 1 r ut r. n r, A 1'1.7 i►1 !'� r+ r•• r :
56
43
tT I7�Tf "[7'TTTI r77T
r -
44
58
29
5541400
07! 1.3 4
MINN STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
»,
45
. ......_...__ _..................
. way..._. W._.,.......... .._...........�y....._....W,,. _,.._:... ...:..
46 2811
47
541400
07/13/94
..W,_.._....
MINN STATE TREA
TO CO DEP 241
1 0 . 0 0
10.0 62
63
48 14201
0 i Nr W
T i Ti
T"�LTFR`TTTiT.r
GTf TCaT _ ..` , !PMENT,
E
7 r'
64
49
50
MAI MATE
40 +
65
ss
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
2874
67
51
52
53
70
14ZO2
OZOO; 5
07/25/94
ADOLESON s {: PETERSON, I NC .
PROGRESS PMT COM GYR — JUNE 94
189 s �: � 4.41
18' , 5: 4.41
54
72
•
T ._.
5F
1 4203
56
02 0200
07/ 25/94
AD V ANCE L I H ' II G y INC.
MAIIii MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
� �t1 ..•wti4
73
�'`
� � tr *.,~w4 74
75
57 n r. , ,s
r. .w. r.:,f ,1 r
n .• r•. i
n r rti r+ r r »: k I w t . t i r•.
r». r rW w, w1 - • r. t : _.: r y .r. rr .• .» :. _ .. .►
,- ..
76
a
VOUCHREG
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 5 78
E
FOR PERIOD 07
2
2
3
3
p
4
VOUCH E R/
5
4
CHECK
VENDOR
CHECK
VENDOR
I TEII
ITEM
C HEC K 6
5
14UMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AM 0' U NT
AMOUNT 7
6
8
9
7
8
F AGER RENTIAL SERVICE JULY 5' 4
Zi .04
I;ZL 10
9
12
4205
092 t 0 0 0
07i26/94
*MEft 1 -DATA SYSTEM
�d fe ftr_ 114 1 F U Rem jAor-u
31 IT I . i4
13
10
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
Z69 . 45
14
11
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
12 G . 9 (1
16.27 15
12
16
1 3
14 14Z06
o s o 4 Z 0
07/Z!5/94
ANDERSON, EVERETT A
'LDG INESFECTI S FOR JUNE 94
O r'
17
Z 6 0 18
19
15
lul 11
20
16 .t 4207
0-90660
07/25/94
ANIMAL CON* L SERVICES,
It a r_ n v J. Fff
lNC i E 9 5
2 1 t44 e
t Y 4 4 . 16. A- 21
17 14208
031.100
0*7 /25/94
AFFEARA14CE PLUS
CAR WASHES
3.50
23
18
24
25
19
20
CAR WA, S
5L 0 0.
26
21
27
28
22 1 4 2_' 0 9
11.0
0 7' RDEN SHOREVIEW HOSPff
-125 i 9 4
13 1) 1 loci
29
30
23 14210
040915
072 5/ 9 4
AR14ALS AU 10 SERVICE
REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE
68Z.88
31
24
v t n L F
32
0 J 4
� 33
25
34
26
14ZIl
09,06 0
07/25/9
AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES
REPAIR MAINY/VEHICLE
lZ4.Z7
35
Z4,27
27
d
36
28
1421Z
060050
07/25/94
B.A.P. DIRECT
SUPPLIES OFFICE
15TS-04
37
157.04 31�
29
39
30 '"
1 _3 1 7 fS 0
31
0 7 • i Z 55 9 4
......
40
41
42
32
14;414
06
f
)7 Z fj 9 4
B A UER B r U I LT
SUPPLIE S VEHICLE
Z4 .
43
33
fl. I T tl- lr*t
v
1 5
44
45
34
SUPPLIES VEHICLE
19.31
59.25 46
35
47
36
1 4-&! b
`2Llz-'/94 E+EftR-Y 5 VEHiC E �
0 1 7
48
49
37
50
38 14216
07'IZOO
07/Z60e-4
BEST BUY COO
SUPPLIES -EQUIPMENT
51
39
40
j Uf +-L-ff 5; C4 F F I C-.
t 3- 6 6
52
5
:2 0 .8 53�
54
41 14217
071310
07/25/94
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
OF MPLS. R E F A I R ','3. MAINTENANCE Cl7_,NYRACT
T515 r91
755.91 55
42
56
57
43
1 4 2" 18
073000
017/25/94
SJORKLUND, JOSEP H
R E F U14D TE 1414 1 O U R !d A ! f , N !.
C .; 0 0
0 0 58
44
59
45 i 42 i 9
000900
07 255 914—fP&
A R D F—WA+E+ e 6 M P! 1 S
L
S f -&t*ER-S El f 1 L i-F 1 E S mo TT H ST
61
UTILITIES - 2659 E 7TH S7
24.60
62
47
UTILITIES - 1810 E CO RD B
18.04
45.72 63
48
64
49
14ZZ
091
07/25/Fi4
El-RUEN, WILLIAM H.
Flfif� PROTEC71014 CCINIS:ULTING SER
65
66
50
67
51 i
52 i 4 22
:
i 0 i 3 0
f ) 7"" 5 1 9 4
1 1 A V-1 r—
• UILDERS S1 %i r% FA F_
B 4
A-
t Al A-IN T E t+eE P! AYE E fR 1 A L
--
i 9 TO 68
69
53 14222
54
110180
07*/25/94
CADALYST
SUBSCRIFI*1014 - Z YRS
59 00
70
5 0 0 71
72
55
56 14ZZ3
110440
07/Z6/94
GAR-
REPAIR 11 MA /VEHICLi�
6(. .00
73
75
57
-A 0 1 T' I- C-A-A
76
t -7 4- f- _T & ♦ _, _7 I %.• v I I " --I I ., •r Um n I % L. L_ 1 4 L_ •t I I L_ I I L_ V " T 4 U- L_ U_ M " I- W " It Isi U. L_
.« - ...,,.: -gym... ....-........,.._ ...- .......,,,.»...... «..,,.,. .....,
.- ..._�_. -,.. . - -....
_., =.. ,.,. -
T :..,,,.< ,.,...,...._.
^- .:- -... ,.- . -- ,- ., - , ..,,.,. •.- ,.+ -.^. - ....>.r m ro: :m;.r,- e,,,,,, ,,,,,, , ,. .».a
VOUC:HREr
CITY OF MAP LEW
RAGE 6
_ may_ yam__
+.f 1 ;-f ! a.. r �r
y ,j� �j . �• *•
cl tit
1
2
FOR PERIOD O
2
3
3
4
4
CHECK
VE14DOR
CHECK
VENDOR
ITES!
ITEM
CHECK 6
NUMBER
NUMBER'
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOU14T 7
6
8
14 2 2 1 .55
8
1 2 0 3 5
07 /2 5 /9 4
C ON
CELLULA PHON U
?'�i Y D7
7In Yu7 10
11
9
- ` 4 2 . 2 y 1 - - 1 10 0 ` _ -Y "'25/94 y •��-# - lP - P 1 "A R 1`� t �" - L- D - ."_......
------A -T-E- ` 'y- C-t -Trr�'_t R .A.
. � r
` .? r 13
i
10
11
14
14227
14042
07/25/94
CLEVER COMPUTING
REPAIRS MZNCE. /EQUIPMENT
110.00
110.00 15
12
16
13
14228
14
160810
07/2 —$5 94
_
COURIER DISPATCH GROUP I COURIER SERVICE JULY 1 54
�17
2 4 18
19
15 »
i L
» r
� } �}�
I.. L 1 » 4.1 { ! {r� 5w r
ter �w + f /.y
P } y 0 f !i^
'
.•
16
}
r �». r ..
r i M . r
21
17
22
14230
170200
07i25/94
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
5.33
5 3 :: 23
18
24
19
14281
20
170800
07 /Zri /94
D D SR`E'EDOMETER
SPEED CAL I'BRA7 I CRS
DCj
25
>, C �,} 2
•� � ..
22
P R IL
�� `. , / •...• !
Y :. Y • :.....::. ....... . ...:.. .
7"� {.. L. A M V 1 l ' -' 7. �
, ..� {r r .1
27
28 ...... ..
, ..f 2 r r�
29
14 2 33
24
1 80900
0 7 /25 / 9 4
DALEY, FAT
PLUMBING IN S J U N E 9
7'TZ .00
31
PLUM E O .-ING --114 8P i-t
., 165 ii 0
25
26
PLU +IN IN J 94
9 t,
33
34
27
r.. 3
28
1) e..,
r _
a.. • .•
.�.
_ f �,�,�•
14 1
�w «» r
.p, •yam
11 T N C -t! AT L..
i.. �.. +:. r a
35
, .: 35
37
29
MAINTENANCE MATE
8
�,.::�, . 38
39
30
31 2
r. , VX
'� R �t "_ M ci f .. 2
40
4
32
SU PP L IES r" �,�f U .� P M E N
w r
42
REPAIRS & M YNCE « ! �t�U � �''MENT
� � p �»���
43
33
7 Q U 1 "
r
34
35
SUPPL - EQUI
1 1 r 4 3
45
Ti . 1 2 46
47
37
" 49
50
14 fa 3
1 171:
D7 >...�f r 4
D
P ROGRAM SUPPLIES
54 >< � 7
$5 4,.
39
52
•
40
4 14238 14S
200450
07/25/94
DIERIC=H, MARY
REFUND -- MOBILE PLAYGROU14DS
2 00
53
�.5 r00 54
55
42 .,..
. «.
r
56
OTi
DOMMAY MARY
REFUND
5'i
.
44
58
4;w�.4�
1*rrScic„►
�� /. "
DC�I� s �1C�DE
F'Ri�Gi AM SUF`
r .�,
jIN r 59
45
....._- ......�
..�..�._�.._...._
...........�... �
60
46
'14 �: 41
47
210325
OT
D, r � f D Y hi E C H A N . I C A L 9 I NC.
PROG PMT �:: �� hl C 1' R J Li N 1. �`� 4
� �: , 2 1 F r `;� w
s 2
PR O GRESS PMT C OM C R JUNE 9 4
14 0 63.26
63
48
64
49
!
5 0
66
14 2 4 2
x:10800
0 7/2 5/9 4
DUCKLOW, LI14DA
REFUND -- T INY TOT-:
45 r 0 0
4 f 0�i 67
51
_
68
52 14243
53
L:
�:�7/'�.; `4
DU , NA NCY
Ut�L " ��r_h! ! SC EL r� PERMIT 4�:,4 -`4
3T.00
:37 r t: {: 6 0
71
54
55
,... - •
..: ,» w
r ' 4
'�T — f — T ,» 'STS
� A S ` 1 S I D C.: J • A C� % _i ____
iTT r .g
+ I I L^_' Ll 7
�'�" '��� ;J �� �..
t6,56
72
at ,.. .. 73
Sr
74
,� 1~
1 �• :.. 4 •„1
r» » r«. ,r
�;. �, c,� ,;:. � t,�
OT / 25 / 9 4
F A Ft i�9 E R S U C ►.� - 1] P A S S �a C
_ _
MAINT MA TERI AL
1 !3 `�(f
. 150 « wt }' 75
57
76
oft
VOUC:HREG
CITY OF MAF'LE1" OOD
PAGE 7
1
2
FOR, .PERIOD 07
2
3
T
� �
3
4
4
CHECK
VE14DOR
CHECK
VE141DO
I T EM
ITE11
CHECK 6
5
6 NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AM 7
7
14246
Z70171
07/Z5/94
FLAIL—MASTER
SUPPLIES — VEHICLE
4Z4,54
9
4Z4 10
8
-54
s
-+:.;;-'4 7
:22 7 03 0 0
_
11
9 .
10
11
1 4245
280100
0 7/ 2 5 /9 4
FOR YOUR S PO R T
U141F C.1RMS CLOTHING
99.00
14
99.00 15
12
16
13
.� ,»" ';
14
300,500
7 Z
:. K S ERVICES
�" U R 1+15 ' : 1 �„ �,. ��, H N
-
,» ► .«
18
15
U 111 F - CiR 14 S CLOTH
4Z .4 O
C�.� 91 19
20
16
14250
3OZ300
07/Z5/94
GEORGE' BODY SHOP
A/R INSURA14CE CLAIM
1 (�:,T 7 G
21
i T57 T6 22
17
, .
.
20
14
•7OZ r 3F.
0 ( /Z
GLOBAL �i�'�,1'�1' i'1�IBT CO
SMALL � UULw�
43 1 w �: t.�
26
27
• �4•'s i
21 .
.�J
28
22
1425 3
320200
07/25/94
_
GRACE, DUANE
FEES F SE RVICE
664.
d -24 30
23
24 , - r-. 6 5
0
., _ ,51.E -
_..
--M*i-N+i4i-Eff Kiz E
•.�
25
ra ,� 33
26 .,
�. '� •.::; F .,i F .J.
27
`' •+ �,
, .
7lf;:5 r
GREEN VALUE NI..FiSE,tY
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
1: "f „5
34
35
01 A - N - Tt*A E
" •
36
28
29
MAINTENANCE M ATE R IAL
48. 55
37
38
30
MAIN MA 1 ER
TO .29
- X1 39
31
_
4Z!56
32
•�.� ti*�
(
,t7/Z5/.�4
HAYMAN, J ANE T GREW
_
F•ROGRAM SURF'LILS
4ZP
41
4 2
33
FEES 1" 0R SERV I CE
6
43
.• �1`
`L
•
44
34
� .. ,
45
35
14 .'.:. !i7
330800
0
_
H LA LY'--RU 1*F
R EPA I R 4 M A 114 7 I /E. 'ME.NT
1 00.: 1
46
1 47
36
•
48
37
14Z58.
38
0 7 1 Z!5 ♦
!
H �t 1 `l 1 ��. !�l ! 4.. la C
OUTSIDE R t l�l t" A �... . �:� Lf I `1~i t�.. l�1 T
1 Z 1
50
39
U U TS IDE. R A L ^' E P "1
I 0 tl',. �.�C)
51
OUTSI L, �- t..i r A L -
,,,
6 -3
52
40
" 53
41
1425•
351400
07 /215 9
_
HORWA TH TOM
WEEKLY TREE INSPECTION
1 1 330. 0 0
54
1 1 330 . 00 55
56
43
44 14'2
:370080
07/65/94
HUNT ELECTRIC
_
PROGR F'leiT Ct.11rt Ci » R JUNE 94
_
1Z Q , l9 it 0
58
45
PROGRESS PMT CH CT R J U N E Fy4
I 1 , x:48 » 00
59
jol PRO-G-RES —FIMT
6
46
f
,� ,
ti ' .- 61
47
14 2 1
4s
390100
07/25/94
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST.
2Z PUBLISHING
.35 .33
62
63
49
5 0
PUBLISHI
•.�� •��.
6 5
66
51
F' U S' LI H I N G
.3 5 q ;� .�;
67
-
_.
v. L - J p . . W l 1 1 N 6
68
52
53
F'Uf3LI
r
5.33,
69
70
54
PUBLISHING
�
71
- U D L 4 -S .H . .1 . 1 1 fj -. ,. -_ ....._m _.--- ,.._.....,_, ".._...... ........
.. • ..
72
55
56
PUBL
.15.
74
PRO GRAM SU PPLIES
! -�; � hi, _;
75
'
VO C:HREG
C 1' Y CAF, MAPL
PAG a F8
5
t
2
FOR PE 0 7
2
�
3
3
4
«
_ ._. -
5
5
CHECK
VE14DOR
CHECK
VE,14D��R
I T'EM
ITEM
CHECK 6
.
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AM
AMOU
6
8
a
1 4262
400600 00
07/25/94
J . i . K'ELLER ASSOC:. � 114C .
r
M ISCELLA14EOUS tOMMODI718S
��� � �' 1:
9
,o
' 1
�
9
MIMISCELLANEOUS CCIMMODI TIES
w . W
12
10
f 4
1,
14
.
142� 3
4ca c.�'r'50
OT/2 5/94
JEANE THORNE TEMPORARY SERVICE
TEMP SERVICES FOR RECEP T I►31ax� T
77 . •r5
77.35
tL
--
16
13
t4
1
�4 C 0 9 P
0
J L M S
S Uti+ S C• R I t 1 0N
21 . �7
1 y 97 18
19
.�('
_.- - ....."u"...i { 1 2 r.+ • ................4'
...............:....�
)R'�',{�`�y.
•l i •5
3 ! y '.l � J �u.....a..� •r• { ` 1� .r f�_ i
y � !7'
'- . { �A*M
Mr LI 'J'!■.�{ �" \
!rf Y ..
1 . _
... �.::: ... � ..:
w *
'
t6
17
22
23
14266
410 420
07/25/94
KE.LLER ELECTRIC INC.
SERV ICE CALL
40 . UU
40 ■ 00
18
''
24
1 i 4
4 30 300
07/25/94
1��: t c.3 1 L A t ` S
SUPPLIES �- JANITORIAL
�.. s'5
'� « �`� 26
20
27
.1 2 610E....
- �'j F s + f \.• 7t�1 +:. _
y� y y
ti ■ L 4. ':
22
23
MA A MAT
70
11:3. 30
31
.
24
f ..
t .» . "t
w
32
25
14269
430870
2 •.. .•
! w
wr
�.
« 33
14
4 ._� r 000
T� � r
r
0 7 / 2 50
LAND ALTE I V ES i IN P ROGR AM S UPP LI E S
. 6 . 3 r
34
X27
_ .
3 6
_ .
14271
y�
459200
_
07/
LASE:RQUIP
R'EF' & MTNC:E,
'r 1. 09
37
'51 1.09 38,
39
28
29
31
i4272
46054t
O 7 R •
- C - L*I - 9
r 40
1 41
3 ?_
:.
42
.
.�
14.73
} 90
�460C1 C
•,,• kf
D7 /Z,. /.4
r
LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES
{ ,1
REYA114ER FEE C S 81 I1�1,,,�
5Ci���C��
�CJC� �c�� 43
3.3
44
14274
460630
0 7/Z6/94
LEMAY, JOYCE
RE!=UN'_ - TINY �tOTS
2Z.50 2Z.50 2Z.50
45
22.50 46
34
•
35
47
36
1 4 2 7 55
4707*00
07/25194
LfLLIE SUBURBAN 14EWSPA .
F_u -ISHING j-UNE 1994
r
48
37
9 ,r -0S PUB LI S HING JUN 1 `5 1 9 4 '�
. �
4Z;.
49
5 0 .
38
3 - 14 PUB JUNE, 1 ��9 �
4; :/ 9:5
5�
39
..
_ . 9
52
53
40
41
'-9: -1 1 PUBLISHING JUNE. 1 994
11.70
54
55
,
MAPLEWOO R EV IEW 1 YR
32
Z9 1 9
42
56
43
44
14 7 6
70D
4807'00
>> i
G7 / 2$5 ►4
LOT L11�IE ,�
L IMPROVEM
1 1 � . j0
57
1 '' � . JC3 5
59
,
45
_.... .. ._.... _+�
. 0_
.x . - J �
` +.. T`T � - r
.. . , w -L
2
i4B'S G .. l� j.... _ I�[
i.: � ice. 1 f
_ ���.� �v � t�! tZ
. r
r r
61
d6
47
14278
500300
07
M.A. ASSOCIATES ES
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
33 4.00
62
..,; 34 . oo 6
.
48
64
4 9
14.21
!fir. }ra8ca
/:�:,I
M. TRtUrll� CO*
S U P PLI E S - 1EHC�.
�.5'
'�1w : :ss
,
' 50
67
51
.... -
..t .�..J • j...... { .►• {+ -...
..... •� L �• i � 1.• ....,.......�
........ 4- 4 2.� •« 1....r..:..
L
r.
« -.{ i a..•.�, :3 _ { - y + ► . -�- -} /r+� ��}-- y _ �
;,A
I f • L.�. :i / : � r..... � 1 � 4r. t � � � •.� L' r l � • � . IJ , _• •
_ t :.
. ..:..: .................... •• �{ -' y {�� * y = - y }�-' •- `^y}�w ......... ..............
t ���� 4�J .L ���� �� MJ � F A C• i... � ...........:.�.... ... ' :
.. ,........,....;,..., .........
� - ...r.:4. (.: �� •
68
� + .. �� • r
69
52
i 53
70
14281
5;:�;c�.: 89
0T /%Z75 =�4
MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION �: O. ,
INC. C OMM C °i R PROGRESS PMT JUNE 94
14,647 .06
71
54
55
M1 C T R_"f`R f E S S P
, 8 f i s 9 .:
r i 73
1 56
14 :��
_
�.�'1 0
cal / /'�4
MCUU IRE MICHAEL
- VEHI ALLO
-� �ca.00
��C, �t:�t�s
d76 ,
57
.
VOUCHREG
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE 9
%
- ._
eK-ft - a T
OD 07 FOR FERI
2
3
4
5
CHECK
VE14DOR
CHICK
VENDOR
ITEM
I'TEil
CHECK
6
NUMBER
NUMBER
DATE
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AM u U14T
7
8
1 428 3
5 30 3 10
0 025!94
ME1.A1 DER TRACEY
V�.H,t.C•i~:�. AL..LCj�iAlei1.rE
51
r71rw.
'
11
_
12
14 ti. "
-.r
i-
R m Yt4eE. tEQu i Rv EN'r
4 6) 7 2"
N AINTENA14CE MAT
20 . 94
6 7.0;6
14
15
18
.•
1540735
- �
07/Z5/, 4
R A
AS SO C - 14 1+l is .. l .� i~. S #-
MIlgl4 fY M l . A
.i
14 5 • � 5
20
21
1
5 511' 50
0 7/ 25 / 94
MN /
TR & T R AI N I NG
13 0 . 00
22
TRAVEL & TRAINING
130.00
2e•0 .00
23
24
25
:��•
14 2 8 8
57
r•. "-
0 7 � Z ,�! �+
,-,� �'
lY1 BR OS �
h1A1�iTI+IAN�::. lriA "tiERAL7
. �. ►�
2 6
MA1l.VTENA14CE �A�'E RI A
4 7 . 3
64 .+7
27
28
29
14289
6:::0400
07/25/
MUSEUM PRODUCTS CO.
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
111.6
11
3 0
31
34'
: '
1 1
G3 09
D : '
N A T I V E LAICII?aCA 'E:
FEE rF TEACHI
�.4� . �,;��
240.
35 '.
-.
36'
14 292
6 4 0 550
07
N J EA14
VEHICLE ALLOWANC
,:*
2 0.38
371
38,
39
.. M! !.; +f i •f { f rwr •w' f /'.. .'7' 'R1 1ww 1wj .7 / 7 , ► $ ,+f "'1M
.... .. ...
... ..
42
•� .
1 �...
' �'
#, 7
- , ,,� 4
�. 7 �..
w . M � ••
Q,� � » PAUL 4A'lJLEWO0D
ROTARY 3RD QUARTER DUES FOR 1..��
1C0. � c�
1�.�» c 0
44
45
4
14� 95
i
661110
07
NORTHEAST METRO TECH
I NS TITUTE 'TRAVEL TRAIi'4TNG
302.80
.302.80
46
47
48
50
3 r �
1 4 7
q� �.r U
' £ 7l 5 9 4
NORTHERN H1!DRAULI
_ _
MAINTE14ANCE 01A TRIAL
#�.� r6!Z
51
.
EfRMS f&
'
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
4.25-
54
MAIN MATERIAL
3.18
55
**i-*T-E*A-t+eE M-.
"
"
57
3
58
1 : •
S 6 U
Ci ? 1
OC TOPUS C AR i�►1 A H
R E P AIR M A 1 111" f V >w. HL �. C t.. E
7,50
59
N i
REPAIR & MA INTiVEHI CLE
7 .50
62
7
3
R EPAI R & MA111 /VEHICLE
7 t►
10 5. 00
63
64
65
14Z9
691600
07/26/94
QS TER, ANDREA
SUPPLIES EQU 1.PME.NT
.7Z ,4Z- 4Z-
7Z.4Z
66
_
67
1
14
0 . ---~-
C-f 7•- -2-f-.
7 f'� 1.:. � _ -, L ��
68
69
z
AUG MAPL OO D IN 1103 i ON
50 0.00
1
7 0
3
71
1 j_-
�"�_.1..'._.._._.
-4" 7-i -x.65- 9 " °_-�' 'i' LT #1T3[1
_._ .. i. {.. [Y 7.{ f1 CIV1' $. . -_� .... M.
,_, w •.
6 14:.3
7
711500
0 7iw5/94
PHOTOS 1:O GO
'Ru�GRAM 'U!= �!�'LzES
.»........ - ._.
f.
w _
- -
74
75
76
VOUCHREG
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
66.88
PAGE 10
V
1 -3-'0 9 76,1200
07/255/054 ROAD RESCUE
REPAIR MAllq'(/VEH CL,
Z9 0 Z 4
.,24
SUPPLIES OFFICE
FOR PERIOD 07
,UPPLIES OFFICE
5.41
14310 761-300
07/25/94 ROADRUNNER
FEES FOR SERVICE
.30 75
V
71 4
SUPPLIES
DELIVERIES
30.75
61 SO, 3
CHECK VE14DOR CHECK VENDOR
ITEM
I TE ivl
CHECK
6
5
NUMBER NUMBER DAl'E NAME
DESCRIPVION
A M f) U lqT
AMOUNT
V
6
10
V
DEVELOPMENT
11
REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE
411.05
14
REPAIR & MAINT/VEHILCLE
105.82
15 0
12
1 13
14
REPAIR $88% MAfNiiVEHielzE
REPAIR &.MAINT/VEHICLE
4E0 .4d
12.90
.17
18
0
14305 7213-00 07/25/94 PROGESSIONAL REDEVELOPMENT kEVI APPRAISAL OPEN SPACE 1 1
PROGRAM SUPPLIES 38.32 74.51
14313 78ozoo 07/Z5/94 S&S CRAFTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES
66.88
66.88
1 -3-'0 9 76,1200
07/255/054 ROAD RESCUE
REPAIR MAllq'(/VEH CL,
Z9 0 Z 4
.,24
SUPPLIES OFFICE
3 1 7 7
,UPPLIES OFFICE
5.41
14310 761-300
07/25/94 ROADRUNNER
FEES FOR SERVICE
.30 75
3
71 4
SUPPLIES
DELIVERIES
30.75
61 SO, 3
43 1 '1 *T 61 455 0
07/20-5/94 ROPIULD, KATHY
REFUND TINY: TOTS
'23UPPL I ES OFF ICE
32 .00
910 .64
N 56
14313 78ozoo 07/Z5/94 S&S CRAFTS PROGRAM SUPPLIES
66.88
66.88
6 1 0
SUPPLIES OFF I CE
'122 Is
ST BOOK STAI 1019
SUPPLIES OFFICE
3 1 7 7
,UPPLIES OFFICE
5.41
SUPPLIES OFFICE
8.31
UPPL I ES OFFICE
71 4
SUPPLIES
0
SUPPLIES OFFICE
'23UPPL I ES OFF ICE
32 .00
910 .64
%
6 1 0
4
52
�
ST BOOK STAI 1019
SUPPLIES OFFICE
3 1 7 7
69
71 4
54
N 56
74
1 VOUCHRE'G
CITY OF MAPLEW
,
�' A 1
1
.,.. ,.
Attr#.tC:1�tE. fi . / H�t��:�1 f�t�:fa� 0�.E ,
1
FOR P E Fk 10D 07
2
2
-
3
3
4
5 CHECK
VE14DOR
CHECK
VE14DOR
ITEM
1`l�E
5
E
CH E CK s
H UMBER
N UlylB ER
D ATE
NAME
UES CR I R - T I0 N
AMOU
A 7
6
14320
84Z Z0
07/25/94
STATE QF MINNESCITA
MAY 94 COMP CHt�RG
� r `1' �
9
�� � 10
•'�
11
,,,� ; i . - .
13
11
PROGRESS PMT COM CTR
395.40
14
12
PR P MT C C T
393
3 15
16
14 14322
8. 43 .5 37
07 / 25 / 9 4
ST RA TUS
R EPA IR S 4& MT NC E . /EQ U IRM�;.NU �
� � �"��;.'� «0�j
17
� f ��?'� +�� }�� 18
19
15
16 •./ c,.
8 .l 9
_ i " f 9 4
.Q .» »..
r7
;
•.9 r fir...'
20
21
17
SUPPLIES — VEHICLE
ZZ.76
22
18
S UPPLI ES — VEHICLE
1
23
......5 U'F `
24
19
20
SUPPLIE � VEHICLE
a. _,.
78 �'.8
25
2 6
21
SUPPLIES 'fl E H I C L E .
� 7r:F r � �
� 27
1 Mf '� .7
28
22 1 4344
851 575
07/Z5/94
SYSTEMS SUPPLY, 1 NC .
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
zo 045
30
2
24
SUPPLIES — EQUIPME14 1'
6.60
31
it R�U
_.
25
r
M w.X,d
33
26 4
.1 .3 Z 5
_
_
36
28
1
8
0 4
T « R.F. S UPPLY CO
SUP M J ANI TORI AL
1 8 . 2 7
37
1 38
29
..
i T5
0 7 i �4 5 9 4
TO B " �' E _
_ "
R -A i i4l
39
3 1
.<
r , .
32 •„ �r
1 ,.�
30
07,�Z!51 -4
TR IARCO' ARTS & GRAFTS T NC W
PRIQ)GRAVI SUP PL I ES
� ���
42
1: �,..;c:��,
33
�,�..
_.
44
34
14339
88'0 15
07/25/94
TROPHI U14LIMITE.D
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
132 .41
132. 45
'� 1 46
35
36 y{{�}.�
•w! wr .
}
w{ 'f 'y 0 M y lw +i -
_ I _ } �
� � 1-+ 5 of M.. M
j �w
�- Ai F N
-4-
37
38
SUPPLIES EQUIFME147
p j r
Z' 0
50
°
REPAIR$ ;& MTNCE, /EQUIPMEN
51
3
f � i'
f 52
40
' '
53
41
14331
r3Gy0 10
07 /Z5/` 4
TRUGREEN— MAPLEWOOD
APPLIED 1= ERTILIZER : ;: HERBICIDE
52.19
54
55
42 ,
_ ..
43
44
APPLIED rER ILIZk.R HERBICIDE
45.,80
57
5 8
FE RTILIZER A PPLIED FERTILIZER � HERBICIDE,
,.�• {My
16' 59
60
46
4:332
880875
07 /25 4
T JANE
RE'r`UND — TENNIS OPEN UR1LL
36.00
61
36 62
47
r 00
48
•.,.
63
64
49
. «. .. ,
65
50
1 4 33 4
51_
90OT60
07
_
U N I V E R S T T Y O F MINNESOTA
I H S E C T PLANT 1 F
z . 9
66
�...�
68
52 1 4 23 : 3 5
94
U /
WEB T H INC
S -• ii
23
69
REPAIR MAIleiCiE.i.:,iUIPM
ZO.45
43.55 71
�0
. _
, t1
55
56
90 450
7� Z5/5
X'"• R Q X C O RPO RA TI O N
` C 10 C _
t� ` t I
jj �� i � 6/30
i AGREE,
�T ! � • �1 �'l L ITT i.r C'� � �.:�
r /ti I
s.. •1� . .�
73
73
74
57
4/ 0 M /fit 1N T A COF
"� 7.0
75
PA G 12
i
r _«
4 8
VOUCHER r t R
.
Irtl
I
I
V i it.J j r
! '
i. f t E. C 1
V L.. N D 0 R
c ! � E i_• K
V 1._ ) �1 D r ..! f �
L 1 t 11
.L 1
.4 1 1... i
� • � .-.. i.• i
t- U i f! B E R
14 U !y! L` E R
DA TE
i 4 t; !xi t
DESC
A M f i k i I %1'T
A !+!
•�
4/1-6/30 M A I !'+1 A G E G .• O P I E
18.58
( R
[ R,
IER L.
COP
4f 1 1 .. 1 /.30 MA �.N i I� G+lEE {�P IER
97 4
�I1�
'
1 4.3 �t
�. t I < i
07/ }�� /
• L CI C U M OIL C C a
FUEL '�: �• `� 1
r� r r i - r
1': • r`: -1
Jill
I ,1 1
-
17!
!
.��:.,;_�
'�7t� ::,t�,��
;'25 '::�4
YUNKLR, SANDRA
REF=UND -- TEN!41 S T'OURIIAMf:.lei'
F.
13 . t`.►t�
1".1 „0 ►
,
I' I
ti .1 }
t..) rri f y 1 f j
0
. .. L f"�i 1'! o 1. !' . _ ....
V `t A ; 1. _i W 1 1 � t
u L-
T C AL C: HEC•Kti`.
,
-
i tai
1 "�I
�i
35
Y
1 401
AA
f
16
Q f1
50 t
5:3 •
.,ti
i
Sri
63
- --
-
f:
L l�li
•
6
n
i
71
�)
- - - -- - - -- -- - - -- -- -- - --
— 72
7?
74
i
7 ,
| CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0001
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
0041468 (.')7/15/94 LYLE SWANSON I it 10
0041469 07/15/94 KEN TILLGES
07/15/94 MICHAEL ENGSTROM
0{L414G�1
7/i5/94 LARRY J CUDE-
40.38
__3£6. 4'
1,233.20
0041473 07/15/94 WILLIAM MIKISKA
iDo6.du
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
DANIEL F FAUST
CA
2 5 8 -3.
(*.-,'HECI*,-".. NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE
AMOUNT
'0041475
}+
0041455
07/15/94
DALE CARLSON
2'-
osq 60
0041457
07/15/94
SHERRY ALLENSPACH
294, 00
DEBORAH DEHN
0041458
07/15/94
GARY W BASTIAN
3,
34, 08
1121
0041459
07/i5/94
-N
MARVIN KOPPrEl
294, 00
i`^i
0041460
0��/15/94� `
SHERYL LE
` 2 000. 67
m
0041461
07/15/94
MICHAEL A McGUIRE
3
041480
07/15/94
DELORES A VIGNALO
1 98180
I 3C
�
0041463
07/15/94
PATRICIA HENSLEY
1841v 26
567.83
X.
0041465
07/15/94
EDWARD LEVIN
403a 75
0041467
07/15/94
DAVID J JAHN
1 274. 10
0041468 (.')7/15/94 LYLE SWANSON I it 10
0041469 07/15/94 KEN TILLGES
07/15/94 MICHAEL ENGSTROM
0{L414G�1
7/i5/94 LARRY J CUDE-
40.38
__3£6. 4'
1,233.20
0041473 07/15/94 WILLIAM MIKISKA
iDo6.du
C)041474
07/15/94
DANIEL F FAUST
CA
2 5 8 -3.
'0041475
07/15/94
LINDA ZICK
1 081 2f-a
osq 60
0041477
07/15/94
DEBORAH DEHN
(--)041478
07/15/94
RICHARD HANGSLEBEN
1, 648. 3 1.
041480
07/15/94
DELORES A VIGNALO
1 98180
�
01*041481
07/15/94
CAROLE J ANDERSON
567.83
' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD ' 0002
i EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE ~~'`.`E.~' PAY PERIOD
`
CHECK NUMBER
~ CHECK DATED
PAYEE
2 itt
C ")41502
0'l-)41482
0*7/15/94
JUDY DeBILZAN
427. 22
0041503
07/15/94
CAROL NELSON
1
���
0041-4.63
07 Z 1 5/94
LUCILLE.,,E AURELIUS
95.14
0041484
07/15/94
BETTY D SELVOG
0041485
07/15/94
PATRICIA FRY
676w 29
0041506
07/15/94
JOHN J BANICK
1
'--)041487
07/15/94
CONNIE L KELSEY
707, 76
0041507
07/15/94
07/15/94
BONNIE JOHNSON
646, 66
1181
0041489
07/15/94
LORRAINE S VIETOR
1
0041490
07/15/94
CAROL JAGOE
1,
0041493
07/15/94
MARY KAY PALANK
1
0041494
(".)7/15/94
KENNEI
0041496
07/15/94
JOANNE M SVENDSEN
I
6C)7, 62
0041497
07/i5/94
ELAINE FULLER
612*27
0041498
07/15/94
CAROL F MARTINSON
1,452.84
0041499
07/15/94
ANTHONY G CAHANES
2 itt
C ")41502
07/15/94
DONALD W SKALMAN
2 074, 53
0041503
07/15/94
CAROL NELSON
1
���
11 690, 00
0041506
07/15/94
JOHN J BANICK
1
D4
0041507
07/15/94
JOHN C BOHL
94,99
' 221
0fr 18
07/15/94
M I C HAEL J HERBERT
69f y • 00
�I
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
EMPLOYE
U EARNINGS AND �- {AY LL D EDUCTION CHECKS
07/
SCR# # T A ANDREWS
_ ,... �.. ,� s:.. ;
1 �"t �• �' { -y
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
07 / 15 / 94
1 � f
`v`
! ? i
01 x{2
0 7 / 1 5/94
I
( -H .t.. K NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE
AMOUNT
RICK A BOWMAN
2 154, 72
j
0041
0 7/15/94
LAURA STo GEORGE
9 a 32
I -
� I
j J f » »'T {
r �
f Et 9 4
l s F'_'i ] " f f.... � t � j i..J � �'Y `_ ! t +--- ! �
2 !t 0 9 � N � MJ
1
i
•
0041511
07/15/94
DAVID KVA
1 } 266, ao
. ;
»y » }'�.#�.. �.::
fry t' �' �+ WIL L I A M
{ k..»� I
1 y � �+ ! f »}
fr 7/ 15i 94
�•:�. 04AL D D �.�..'i�'ti •:
f
:, ,. f_yw�. ;
U1,14 3
07Z 15Z�-744
".')04153i
07/15/94
DAVID J THOMALLA
ZC
. �
• i yl
.
0041514
f! �
0 7 / 1 5 i f � f
�p�. + {� r{[»[y. tj� } ■s • � { ♦
CABOT • •_' T 1 L MY" i • L I L
r try» ={1 � {.
� �{'. 759. 1rI lYf.
L:
I
00
07/1 34
V I G I N I A �y�.. W1.yLE
1
0041515
07/15/94
R I C.*HAR J �.AP4.
690, • }_y f
I ,
•
004 _
C-) 4 1-51 1
STEVEN PALMA
DALE RAZSKAZOFE
i
0041535
07/15/94
P AUL
0041517
07/15/94
MICHAEL RYAN
2 95
i 2 l
' 221
0fr 18
07/15/94
M I C HAEL J HERBERT
69f y • 00
�I
:361
i
f" 0 4 i -
07/
SCR# # T A ANDREWS
_ ,... �.. ,� s:.. ;
1 �"t �• �' { -y
•!
.
1
0(- y .:fry
07 / 15 / 94
RICHA C D E G L�
`v`
! ? i
01 x{2
0 7 / 1 5/94
KEVI JOHNSON
1 f »y-��c
� %.. �. ... ,M 1
0041527
07/15/94
RICK A BOWMAN
2 154, 72
1 034, 80
i
- ) 7 / 1 5 , /9
. I '� # D �' A R I S
• �':
i
0041
07 / 15/94
GREGORY L � � i� �'•�E
l � �L �f..y . �.ry�,.y
33
1 8924 ol
i
} - . - 4 1 53 ( - yf_� »y
07 / 1 5 /9 4
I
1
-
fr 7/ 15i 94
�•:�. 04AL D D �.�..'i�'ti •:
f
:, ,. f_yw�. ;
•
35
:361
i
2 529a 10
♦
`v`
004 1 526 5i. 6
07 / 1 5 / 94
DER BELL T S T CKT N
1 s E 00
0041527
07/15/94
RICK A BOWMAN
2 154, 72
- ) 7 / 1 5 , /9
. I '� # D �' A R I S
23 )05,5
0041529
07/15/94
STEPHEN J HEINZ
1 8924 ol
i
} - . - 4 1 53 ( - yf_� »y
07 / 1 5 /9 4
JOHN FRASER
1 r 53.9 l
'-Fl f
".')04153i
07/15/94
DAVID J THOMALLA
ZC
004
0 7 /1 5/94
KEVI f t
i `i iB T T
� o e
i► � LJ�� r i..J
L:
I
00
07/1 34
V I G I N I A �y�.. W1.yLE
1
004 _
f ry t` / 1 � s / 94
STEVEN PALMA
2 1 1 f•'L= c y
i
0041535
07/15/94
P AUL
' CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0004
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER
— CHE CK DATED
�
'
+'
0041536
07/15/94
MELYNDA BJORKMAN
1,003.82
| |
.a
0041537
07/15/94
ROBERT E VORWERK
1 767, 60
��
/ !
s|
|e'
0041538
07/15/94
'
JOSEPH A BERGERON
2 30
|m
0041539
07/15/94
JAMES MEEHAN
1 1 968. 73
��
|n
.�
-4- 54
07/15/94
JON A MELANDER
1
!
~`^^1541
-- �
` /15/94�
— �
_
... .. . -- '_ .—R�
SARAH
23�. 1 ��
7a|
0041542
07/15/94
JAMES M EMBERTSON
1 1
/
0041543
07/15/94
DUANE J WILLIAMS
14591,42
1041544
07/15/94
JANET L RABINE
1 , 4j66 a 36
0041545
07/15/94
JULIE A STAH:iNKE
1 379. 04
0041546
07/15/94
SCOTT K BOYER
14543,84
26
0041547
07/15/94
ELSON
LINDA ADL
626a 0 1
Q 0 .4 15 4 8
*7 15 /134
DAVID L ARNOLD
2
01041549
07/15/94
W AL
|�|
0041550
07/15/94
' JOSEPH FEHR
1 466. 32
0041551
07/15/94
JILL PETERS
C 041552
��.
0041553
07/15/94
JUDITH WEGWERTH
648,12
C)(--)41554
07/15/94
KEN114ETH G HAIDER
2 504, 14
4
0041.555
07/15/94
JUDY M, CHLEBECK
1 3()2, Bo
0041556
07/15/94
WILLIAM PRIEFER
1.1
0041557
07/15/94
GERALD W MEYER
1
0041559
07/15/94
BRYAN NAGEL
1
1 303, 69
i _�
0041562
07/15/94
LANCE LUNDSTEN
1 66=5. 1 1
•
CI OF MAP L EWOO
k� } {..;}}::3�;
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARN AND P AYR OLL D EDUCTI ON C
a
ICI
FOR THE
C PAY PER IOD
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE.
MOUNT
O
JOHN SCHMOOCK
1 267. 60
i
f i
j�
G ; >t_} }y «} "' ,«� + t 4
]
C •
R •} } ' }«� s j j }•« f jam•'«''
L+ t I i.... L E �
} _j }•_»� +f
� t«�. 5 • 6 • »}
Jt L,
0 `
i
f� 041 � 6
07/115/94
R I Cif OSWA .
� � �� f . �};.�
T ZACK
3i
I
C-)041568
0 7/15/94
RANDAL.LINDBLOM
1 330. 60
i
a
004156
07/15/94
JAMES G ELIAS
»
i
t Gtr l
I ,
{ »} 0 {{ 57 {{
d.�, S t..� f S
f .- ) f / 15/94
J O HN A R
• » yy,,��
S +� a: �3 t.:i f � t..i 0
1
r« '•'T ."'j
0 » }41L.. f�.:..
q »� «� t L••J / j �
f!
7w �7 .i. M•t { �L
11565,20
I
^ �I
:24
00
07
WILLIA P 1 L I l«. iw• E
.t. � 647 88 _.
0415 r 4
07/15/94
WALTER M E I SSLE
}�«
�� L� �
,p7,
i
0 041575
07/15/94
THERESA ME �' Z
I 3 t...L 0 u 8 s•�
? ?
i y ,i i
I I
{ • 1 j .} -- }.»_
. } () _ 1 5 f 6 - -
0 7 /1 5/94
JO R L... t L#
d. f. 7. 3 ,; 7
3
...7 ...
07
6 03 ,
i I
PAUL NE ST APLt:'_1
i.
�a!
i
i r• G 9 I
004
0
JUL CORt..1•O R AN
1 M >E » }0'
'.'-)C)41581
07/15/94
SANDRA LEARNED
540v 00
I
i I
TARK
rt4 i
004
0
E...� ? 's t't {. f' .L o f 's
456 f ti' L.
='
0041 +
0 f / 1 5f 94
J OE L ELLI S
,:�'3•00
0041585
07/15/94
SHANE HANSON
383. 25
i
-4
EL GRAF
1521
0041587
07/15/94
ROBERT S ANDERSON
i
r {{ �t � J••
07/ t f
.L.J J«.. L L 7 S ; L l •'! ! I
2 , 3 b Q
j L
•
/
|o/
|^�
0041590 07/15/94 SHANE SWANSON
�'.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD . 0006
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED PAYEE AMOUNT
0041614 07/15/94
07/15/
THOMAS G EKSTRAND
MARJORIE OSTROM
75.00
1,670.64
1.843.51
0041616 07/15/94 NICHOLAS N CARVER
� 1,518.80
0041592
07/15/94
JAMES SCHINDELDECKER
1
0041593
07/15/94
MATTHEW KIMLINGER
6'03, 13
594
-o041
C)(--)41595
07/15/94
GARY HINNENKAMP
916,40
004159
'6
07/15/94
MICHAEL LAVAQUE
916a 40
;;81
0041597
07/15/94
STEVEN DEHMER
186. 00
i2(3
0041598
07/15/94
RAYMOND GE.RNER
3011-40
0041599
07/15/94
JANET M GREW HAYMAN
567. 32
112. 50
~~
0041601
07/15/94
Lu THER JONES
20
13 It
~~ |
004 1 604
07
JUDITH A HORSNELL
A;61 36
6:
004 1 605
07/15/94
ANN E HUTCHINSON
1 384, 4".)
0041607
07/15/94
KATHLEEN M DO
07/15/94
MARIE BARTA
1 167a44
07/15/94
GEOFFREY W OLSON
2
004 16 10
07/15/94
NANCY MISKELL
498,15
0041611
07/15/94
JOYCE L LIVINGS TON
851, 40
:ds
().)4 12
07/15/94
CHRISTOPHER McGLINCEY
22 1, 00
0041613
07/15/94
KENNETH ROBERTS
1
�'.
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD . 0006
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
CHECK NUMBER CHECK DATED PAYEE AMOUNT
0041614 07/15/94
07/15/
THOMAS G EKSTRAND
MARJORIE OSTROM
75.00
1,670.64
1.843.51
0041616 07/15/94 NICHOLAS N CARVER
� 1,518.80
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0 C) 0 7
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD
E FERRAZZO
T
128i
ii
204, 75f
5
-.'AYLENE PETERSON 195
.—C)041630 07/15/94
273wOO
0041631 07/15/94 ERICA HANGSLEBEN
')1041632 07/15/94 LOWELL SOREINSON
21 6 Is 2 t-1
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE
AMOUNT
•
161
-33
07/15/94
ELLEN CAMPBELL
243a 00
0041617
07/15/94
ROBERI J WENGER
i 537, 20
0041635
07/15/94
'd i "' 1 S T. SAUVER
244a5O
OU41
-7/15/94
1-.,ELLY RYAN
2 6 5, 0
0041619
07/15/94
TRACEY MELANDER
303a 00
•
)"*)041637
07/15/94
JILL SCHOENECKt":� R
229 , 510
004 1620
07/15/94
BENJAMIN MAJOR
301 00
Q 0 4 1 E,
'-)7/ i 5/94
KRISTEN HALE
2kD6, 25
0041639
07 i 5/94
JOLAINE OLSON
0041622
07/15/94
SARAH SKILLINGS
208 00
4 f
0 0 4 1 6k'=-'3
07/15/94
TANIA CHASE
368, 0 I j
004
C-4 A
ANGELA NELSON
1-32..50
7r!
0041625
0 7 1 5' 94
--L STIEN
NATHANIE
12, 00
0041626
07/15/94
PHILLIP Sl
0041
07/15/94
MICHELLE HILSGEN
4 2, 50
0041628
0*7/15/9."+*
SHANNON MILLER
• 6 C-) a 0 0
E FERRAZZO
T
128i
ii
204, 75f
5
-.'AYLENE PETERSON 195
.—C)041630 07/15/94
273wOO
0041631 07/15/94 ERICA HANGSLEBEN
')1041632 07/15/94 LOWELL SOREINSON
21 6 Is 2 t-1
1361
161
-33
07/15/94
ELLEN CAMPBELL
243a 00
_Q04
(0041634
07/15/94
KELLY HUGDAHL
28... 00
0041635
07/15/94
'd i "' 1 S T. SAUVER
244a5O
- 6
0 0 4 1 1*13� 6
o7/15/94
NATHAP-4 I El. RENTERIA
3. 00
•
)"*)041637
07/15/94
JILL SCHOENECKt":� R
229 , 510
0041638
07/ 15/94
ANDREA KNABE
4o., 00
0041639
07 i 5/94
JOLAINE OLSON
-
00 1 640
07/15/94
BR AN SVEN DS EN
-0
217', 5
0041641
07/15/94
NATALIE HILSGEN
37 1, 00
C)041642
--.)7/15/94
ANGELA RADEMACI -iE R
70,00
0 4 1 Es 4 3,
07/15/94
MARY S T I EN
3 7 8, 0
�1
( F »} 4 1 6 54
0 .7 / 1 +•..f / 9 4
KEVIN
H A L» W L». G ,, J 1 'ti
4 " ± 5 9 ... f
i25l
1 i
C Il
_Y OF MAPLEWOOD
934o 89
'
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNINGS
Af-.!D PAYROLL DEEEDUCTION
07/15/94
^
I -
W BREHEIM
FC. - H
1...• - .J 1" P P ER I O D
�_ c �_4 1 Es 56 ,
i
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE
AillIOUNT
4
0 04166 VOID
07/15/94
M APLEWOOD STATE BANi 1
J
}
0041657
07/15/94
DAVID
GERMAIN
1 3Lk4. 54
-44
0041
(-7/15/94
TAINIAR
215. 25
n
,
0 0 8
07
DE NNIS
f f NLw t l
0 7/15/94
ANDREW GUZIK
i
4 ti.�x 0
i
iJI
004 1646
JENNI
C } r ) 4 1647
} r• f/ 15 94
GERALD D I E L
2' 00
00 4
07 / 1 5/9 4
RE . CA BANCE
204 Q;„�
1?
J '
0 04 1 64 9
07 / 1.. / 94
ROY G WARD
460. 00
!ice 7
«
07/15/94
�
j ..
4?ab� I
,
1
i
0f._)41653
07/15/94
EDWARD A NADEAU
1. 92
1231
�1
( F »} 4 1 6 54
0 .7 / 1 +•..f / 9 4
KEVIN
H A L» W L». G ,, J 1 'ti
4 " ± 5 9 ... f
i25l
1 i
07/15/94
ELIZABETH J WEILAND
934o 89
'
Q}� }-41 E•62 VOID
i
; 2 7!
0041655
07/15/94
ROGER
W BREHEIM
=8
�_ c �_4 1 Es 56 ,
07
D A V ID
B ED
412, 81
1 /4fI
� v
4
0 04166 VOID
07/15/94
M APLEWOOD STATE BANi 1
J
'. }o
0041657
07/15/94
DAVID
GERMAIN
1 3Lk4. 54
i3 ,
n
,
0 0 8
07
DE NNIS
f f NLw t l
1 1 439a6O
�1
0041659
0(_- 4166'-
07/15/'34
07/15/94
GEORGE C SPREIGL
CONNIE WERMAGER
912, 27
i
0041661
07/15/94
ELIZABETH J WEILAND
934o 89
'
Q}� }-41 E•62 VOID
07/15/9 4
F I R I" 1 NNE �:i�� A s CA)
11,154,31
T 1
= -�
.. 7
i
�L 04 6 VOID
07/
P U BL I 1...' EMP R A SS C%-
5 5 : " ;�
,.� . 1
4
0 04166 VOID
07/15/94
M APLEWOOD STATE BANi 1
24, 597.
�1
0041665 VOID
07/ 15/94
MN STATE COMM OF RE
10 4, 19
= -�
.. 7
0041667 VOID
07/15/94
FIRST M I NNE SO T A
568.75
{
')041668 VOID
07/15/94
CITY OF MAPL EWOOD (H #
41 496. CUB
�1
J
!23
30
i3l
33
!'
30'
si
j 38
37
0041 t'---%83 VOID
( 4 VOID
07/15/94
07/ 15/94
FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA)
PUBLIC EMP RE*f 1 REPIE0,J
ASSOC
1 i 0a0l 65
5 891, 93
0041685 VOID
07115/54
PUBLIC EMP: RE"r I REMENT
ASSOC
CITY
OF MAPLEWOOD
0009
PUBLIC EMP RETIREME__N!"
ASSOC
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS
-
AND PAYROLL DEDUCI I CHECKS
AND DEDUCTIONS
368 324w 42.
FOR THE
CURR04T PAY PERIOD
it
CHECK NUMBER
CHECK DATED
PAYEE
AMOUNT
C} k'-)41 E.71
VOID
07/15/94
UNITED WAY OF ST, PAUL AREA
� ;� � . 80
( -)43
k 6.72
VOID
-)7Z 15Zr-44
CLIME INS N C. E
YIERCIAL LIF
9 70
23 ,
7 1
0(341673
VOID
PUBL I C EPIP RETIREMENT ASSOC*
166,-50
0041674
07/15/94
'S. 19-3-388
MNw MU I"LiAL LIFE I t--4
966. Of.-.)
'o'
07Z15/94
A CME 725,
685, 65
004 1676
07/15/94
AFt5CME 2725
7. 99
1 A
0041677
07/15/94
METRO SUPERV.1'SORY ASSOC
18, 0C)
-71
0041 e7_8
07 / 15/94
'C I ON
MIA BENEF 1 I ~ . ASSOUHI
59-9, 77
it
1 0041679
VOID
0.7/15/94
PUBLIC EMP.R..ETIREMEN_1 ASSOC
0041680
VOID
07/15/94
PUBL IC EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC
I . z 3
;211
C) Q 4 1 6 EA 1
0'0""
07/15/94
GREAT WEST-LIFE
285, 00
00.41682
VOID
07/15/9-4
VACATION CHECK
53,7, 40
J
!23
30
i3l
33
!'
30'
si
j 38
37
0041 t'---%83 VOID
( 4 VOID
07/15/94
07/ 15/94
FIRST MINNESOTA (FICA)
PUBLIC EMP RE*f 1 REPIE0,J
ASSOC
1 i 0a0l 65
5 891, 93
0041685 VOID
07115/54
PUBLIC EMP: RE"r I REMENT
ASSOC
235R-54
A+
0 1 E-86 VOID
07/15/94
PUBLIC EMP RETIREME__N!"
ASSOC
A,,
9 -3- 2, 2 *7
GROSS EARNINGS
AND DEDUCTIONS
368 324w 42.
1
: -0.
J
2
: -0.
F,,Z 4
MEMORANDUM
Date: Thursday, June 16, 1994
From: Ann Hutchinson
To: Pauline Staples /City Council
Subject: Donation to Nature Center
Action b C ounoll
EndOrsed.
NodIfie
The Maplewood Nature Center has received a $6.00 donation from Girl scout troop 479 that we request be
credited to the program supply budget line 101- 604 -000 -4120 .
A thank -you has been sent.
001
MEMORANDUM
Date: Tuesday, . June 21, 1994
From: Jean Nelson
To: Pauline Staples & City Council
Subject: Donation to Maplewood Nature Center
We have received cash donations of $10.46 in our donation box from various visitors. Please request that this be
credited to the program supply budget line, 101- 604 - 000 -4120. Thank you.
Co
MEMORANDUM
Date: Wednesday, June 29, 1994
From: Ann Hutchinson
To: Pauline Staples /City Manager
Subject: Nyberg Memorial Donation
Mrs. Robert Nyberg and daughter Cindy Schreiber, have donated $200.00 dollars in memorial funds to the
Nature Center. Please credit this amount to our equipment supplies budget line 101- 604 - 000 -4160. We will
purchase a sundial to be placed in the wildflower garden on the south side of the nature center building. A
Thank -you has been sent.
F -3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Conditional Use Permit Review
LOCATION:
586 Carlton Street
PROJECT:
Kinderberry Hill Day Care
DATE:
July 19 1994
INTRODUCTION
,&ati.on by Counoil a
Endorse
Modified. - __... r.........
Rejecte
Date
The conditional use permit (CUP) at 586 Carlton Street is due for review. (See the
maps on pages 2 -3.) The CUP allowed the expansion of a day care facility into a
required setback. (See the site plan on page 4.)
BACKGROUND
Past Action
On July 26, 1993, the City Council approved this permit subject to three conditions.
(See the minutes on page 7.)
CUP Review
Section 36- 445(a) states that at the one -year review, the Council may specify an
indefinite term or specific term not to exceed five years.
DISCUSSION
The addition is complete and meets all of the City's requirements. There is nothing
further to review. The City Council should only review this permit again if a problem
develops.
RECOMMENDATION
Do not review the conditional use permit again unless a problem develops.
go \b- 7:kinbertycup (36)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. CUP Conditions dated July 26, 1993
.
1•+
• • t L W • ...
® `
4L if s coum I" HAMr11 fwE A % i Attachment 1
• • E MIAIRYLAND AVE. ' t
• E.ROSE t 2 ST � ' e
...
• $ A VE. ..
AVV .•r,.
MNGNOL K AVE. oriw*w
^arc ❑ ,
z o AVE ...
• CASE AVE. W z • '•
o BRAND L LA. BRAND A VF. : •` .
AVE. •
E �� S T. •
.,�. E stn sT.
CAWO..
e� '.
.� ..
it
AVE ••r,,.
• E MINNEHAHA te •-
• MARGARET AVE.
••
� E. 5 W ST. •./ 1
LC in .• • .
• • °C N o Z EM ONT •
..
27S N J � AVE `, C
2at . �..
• CONWAY AVE ° TAGS RD, t i •
200 1 01!,
t
"• 240 •
• 23
to
•
to
:M
•
• 1
. Tonr�s
Lola
••s
•
i.
•
• 4
.1
•�w
LOCATION MAP
Q
N
2
...��• 254.48
ob
• / " by
i
i
G
A tac t. 2
T74Z
z 1s 621
R 0.40 613 610.
,.
^L
M TRAINING 17
FACILITY 3 0 1 1
3
!1 !- � '' • irk � 9 t. 66 00 4W •.0or � am Mw oft
f -
ao N
iii r.i..�► �� w�� www"M 1�
Sri N � E3
Q •
x.91 CZ.5 _ -- now _. ammo _
KINDERSERRY HILL 3 5?T (3°)
W
�' .1 g
of 4 . s _ ,�
Idw • < . ,..9)
Z
i Q z8
9 A -� .mar _.....w .. • a..r. �-� , w
• W
• was -•=- - --
�os21 .E s� 1 C
.7 549 E3
J
543 _.
4 46
� 9
537
_._ ._ _..r... fmmmomb..�
1w
Oman, 4WD
�a
r `A 00 c � _ s
N ` ..r..._ �..� .....�
"ON". minimm, amon owns
• t�
•., am ' = U.S. WEST I Ll 13 6 ..-- —
• (te)
130
• 05 h
ce
• = i4 � " 4
1 -
y b a,� 265 �. 105.8 . no mom _ 1
now
am ... 5 S Ft. �Csr*+y. for S♦. 1 t lb 3 • 4.: .'� -• • r �� y �' .' -.... 5 r.� 3a - ... 4? •'- 1 4? 0100
coppirovea Vac 14 S 06
. • ...� 5.3 41 1 1 -
.
C O NWAY AVE. , .�T,� 134.�a
w r
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
3
4
N
Ahk-
Attachment 3
3M TRNNING FACIL17Y
PROPOSED CURB CUT fj �i
_ TO BE CLOSED
it
E _ i
PROPOS ADDMON
BUILDING T
co
561 FERNDALE STREET
- BACKYARD
_I- �j
PROPOSm TRASH ENCLOSURE
SITE PLAN
4
4
N
Attachment 4
29 7:15 P. M. 7:I6 P •
C •M•)• 586 Carlton Street (Kinderberry Hill)
a. ,Mayor Bastian
convened the meeting for a ubli '
P c h earing regarding a
request for a Conditional Use Permit to add g
Child Development Cente ont o the K�nderberry Hi11
50' , r, c reating
ng a setback of l ess that t
. he required
b. Manager McGu re presented the staff report
c. Director of Communi Development Olson resent •
report. P resented the specifics of the
d. Commi Geh
rke presented the Planning C •
Commission report.
e. Boardmember Anitzb .
erger presented the Community Design '
report, y gn Revs ew Board
f. Mayor Bastian o .
op ened the public hearing,
opponents* The following g � for proponents or
persons were heard:
Janis Blumentals, Archit
Mike Stroeing, 561 Ferndale
Jim Imbertson, 585 Ferndale
Ted Grant
z f , associated with the day c are y a e center
g. Mayor Bastian close •
d the publ hearin
9
Conditional Use Permit
h. Cou.nci1member Za a in
PP troduced th he-following owe n •
Ad ion. Resol ut i on and moved its
9
4
7 -26 -93
5
93 - 07 - 97
• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION - SETBACK REQUIREMENT
WHEREAS, Nola R. Kreml of Kinderberry Hill III applied for a conditional
use permit to expand a building into a required setback. The addition would
be 274" from the adjoining residential property line, City Code requires at
1ea.st 50 feet.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 586 Carlton Street. The legal
description is:
Lot One, Block Twos Carlton Place, Ramsey County.
WHEREAS, the h i sto:ry of this conditional use permit is as follows :
1. On July 6, 1993, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve this permit.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on July 26, 1993, The City
staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
property owners within 350 feet. The Council gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The
Council also considered reports and recommendations of the City
staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described conditional use permit, because:
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existin g or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person
or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration,
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal Vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on
existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services
including streets, police and fire protects on, drainage structures,
water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
6 7 -26 -93
lo. The setback would be consistent with the setbacks for surrounding
properties.
11. At least 80% of the addition would be screened from property that is
used or shown on the City's land use plan for residential use.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the City, stamped
May 259 1993, as revised by the City. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes and should ensure that
construction does not encroach into the wetland.
2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one
year after the Council approves this permit or the permit shall
end. The Council may grant up to one one -year extension of the
permit.
3. The City Council shall review this permit in one year after
completion.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
Design Review
i . Counci l member Zappa moved to approve the .pl ans I as revi sed by the Ci tv
and gtamged Mil 250 1993 for bu i 1 d i n addition to Kinderberry Hill Da
Care at 586 Carlton Street..with the oroaerty.owner to:
1) Provide a 15 -foot setback from the front lot line for the
remaining blacktop after the removal of the curb cut. (code
requirement) The applicant shall sod the 15 -foot setback and the
adjacent boulevard.
2) Install a handicap- parking sign for each handicap - accessible
parking space.
3) Screen any new roof - mounted equipment visible from streets or
adjacent property. (code requirement)
4) Construct the trash dumpster enclosure as City Code requires.
The enclosures must match the color of the building and have a
closeable gate. The enclosure walls and gate shall extend to the
ground to contain litter. The design is subject to Staff
approval. (code requirement)
5) Landscape east of the trash enclosure. This landscaping is
subject to Staff approval.
6) Move the FDC and the outside fire alarm to the front of the
building at the southwest corner
7) Move the dumpster to the current Handicapped Parking space and
relocate the Handicapped Parking,
7 7 -26 -93
J
8) Submit a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit to the
City for any required work that is not com leted.b occ
p Y
The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. The
property owner shall give the Staff an agreement that will allow
the City to complete any unfinished work.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
1 _
s
i
4
E•�
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action by C ou o i l
TO: City Manager
Endorsed
Modified
FROM: Public Works Administrative Assistant
Date
SUBJECT: Financing for Projects 93 -08 and 93 -14
DATE: July 13, 1994
Introduction
Public Improvement Projects 93 -08 (Sterling Streetll/alley View to Linwood) and 93-
14 (Searle Street Storm Sewer) were ordered after public hearings at the June 13
. 1994, council meeting per resolutions 94 -06 -60 and 94- 06 -59, respectively. However,
neither resolution contained financing information. It is necessary hat the financing
g
be approved by council.
Recommendation
Council approval is recommended for the following:
Project budget of $ for Project 93 -08 with financing of:
Special assessment $ 850,043
Municipal state aid 423,1127
Total financing $1,273,170
• Project budget of $49,000 for Project 93 -14 with financin g of:
Special assessment $15,063 •
Property taxes 33,937
Total financing $49,000
WJ P
jw
' AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager 1
tndorsa ..,,,.,.....�.�....
FROM: Public Works Administrative ' ° ...
i �strative Assistant
ReJected,..
SUBJECT: Financing Date..
g or Project 94 -06 .. ... .
DATE: July 14, 1994
Public. Improvement Project 94 -06, East Shore Drive Storm sewer, was heard on
July 11, 1994. At that time, the estimated project cost was $40,600. However the
staff report did not indicate the source of financing.
g
Recommendation
Council approval of the financing plan for this project is recommended as follows:
Special assessments. $9
Property taxes 31,150
Total financing $40,600
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT
Action by Council
it
TO: City Manager
, zndorseA.,
Mod if ied.
FROM. Public Works Administrative Assistant
Date
SUBJECT: VEM Budget Adjustment—Hydraulic Lift Cleanu Costs
Y p
DATE: July 14 1994
A budget adjustment from the VEM fund to the VEM budget was authorized ,at the
June 13, 1994, meeting to purchase a new truck hoist for the mechanic's shop.
p
However, the attached June 7, 1994, agenda report did not address the issue of
payments to the specialty environmental consultant and the recovery contractor for
the cleanup of the hydraulic fluid spill. The consultant and the contractor were paid-
$3100 and $2500 respectively for the cleanup and required environmental
assessment and testing.
Recommendation
It is recommended that a budget transfer for $5600 be made from the VEM fund to
the VEM operating budget so that payments can be made.
WJP
jc
Attachment
I
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA REPORT .
Action by Council:
TO: City Manager
Endorse d
M o d i f i e d....-.......�.�,..
FROM: Public Works Director Rej ected-
Date
SUBJECT: VEM Budget Adjustment - -Heavy -Duty Lift
DATE: June 7, 1994
In early April the main truck hoist in the mechanics' shop broke. One of the two
underground cylinders rusted through. This resulted in a hydraulic fluid spill. A
specialty consultant and recovery contractor was hired for the cleanup. The cleanup
is now complete and meets all agency requirements.
A new lift is needed for repairing the large trucks. There are two basic
types— inground and floor - mounted. The disadvantages of the inground lifts are the
inconvenience of the lift cylinders in the middle of the vehicle and any leakage goes
into the ground.
Floor - mounted lifts have all moving parts above the floor. Any leakage is contained
above the floor and can be easily recovered. Several floor- mounted lift systems have
been investigated. The estimated installed cost is between $40,000 and $50,000.
The purpose of this report is to request authorization to advertise for bids, and to
authorize a budget adjustment of up to $50,000 from the VEM .fund to the VEM
budget.
KGH
A g enda No. /I
SUBJECT: Salaries for selected Communit Center Positions
In accordance with the Cit Councils wishes, we have ne
the salaries for the remainin Communit Center positions covered
b the Metro Supervisor's Association (MSA). We are in the
process of ne the salaries for those positions covered
b y AFSCME.
The Council previousl approved the positions for the communit
Center and directed staff to ne the salaries. The first
few were approved b the Council earlier, The remainin MSA
positions and salaries are as follows:
Start
Action b y coun'
T
AGENDA REPORT
4 Yr.
.20%
Endorsed.,...
Base
Modified......
DATE: Jul 19, 1994
Rejected.......
TO: Mike McGuire
Date.....
Cit Mana
9.50
10-600
10,30
PROM: Sherr?e Le
9*50
Human Resource Director
10*30
SUBJECT: Salaries for selected Communit Center Positions
In accordance with the Cit Councils wishes, we have ne
the salaries for the remainin Communit Center positions covered
b the Metro Supervisor's Association (MSA). We are in the
process of ne the salaries for those positions covered
b y AFSCME.
The Council previousl approved the positions for the communit
Center and directed staff to ne the salaries. The first
few were approved b the Council earlier, The remainin MSA
positions and salaries are as follows:
Start
1 Yr,
2 Yr,.
4 Yr.
.20%
T 951
Base
10
Child Care Coordinator 9*00
9o50
10000
10*30
Pro Assistant 9,00
9.50
10-600
10,30
A Pro 9100
9*50
10000
10*30
Assistant
RECOMMENDATION
Please submit these salaries to the Council for approval. The
salaries for these part time Metro Supervisor positions have
been ne and we have a si letter of a from MSA
(attached).
LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
Between
THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
And
THE METRO SUPERVISORY ASSOCIATION
The following rates of pay are hereby established for the
positions listed below:
Child Care Coordinator
Program Assistant
Aquatics Program
Assistant
Start
1 Yr,
2 Yr,
4 Yr.
90%
95W
Base
103%
9000
9.50
10.00
10.30
9.00
9.50
10,00
10.30
91600
9.50
10000
10.30
For the Union:
Mat W 5-- tv&dlz lc?z-
gate 4 ll� J99y
For the City of Maplewood
Date:
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Thomas Ekstrand - Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
"Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility
LOCATION:
White Bear and Cope Avenues
DATE:
July 12, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
�. ~s � c�il;s
dot i o�n by C OUn
E
Xod4ifie` - - - —
VOA Care Centers of Minnesota is proposing to build a 62 -unit assisted care living
facility. This facility would be north of the Cope Avenue right -of -way and east of White
Bear Avenue. (See the map on page 13.) There would be 53 studio units, 6 one-
bedroom units and 3two - bedroom units. The building would be three stories high. The
siding would be vinyl with brick accents. There would be a tunnel connecting the
proposed building with the Maplewood Care Center. The applicant would use this
tunnel as a storm shelter. VOA also plans to build an eight - foot -wide trail along their
south property line. (Refer to the site plan and building elevations on pages 17 -18, the
enclosed plans and the letter on page 19.)
VOA is also proposing the following changes to the adjacent Maplewood Care Center
site: (VOA owns the Maplewood Care Center.)
1. Build a wooden fence around the trash receptacle at the west side of the south
parking lot.
2. Replace the wooden fence along the east lot line with a solid, eight- foot -tall
wooden fence. (This was a neighbor's request.)
3. Replace the fence along the north side of Cope Avenue with a berm and four trees.
(This was a neighbor's request.)
4. Remove the two storage sheds that are south of the building.
5. Revise the Sherren Avenue driveway and parking. There are 27 existing parking
spaces along the south side of this drive. VOA proposes to add more asphalt and
restripe this drive for 1 parking spaces and a drop-off lane aloe the south side.
p g
There would be 18 parking spaces on the north side of this driveway. VOA also
plans to narrow the drive entrance from 33 feet to 24 feet.
(Note that the south ends of the new and old parking lots on the landscape and grading
and drainage plans are different from the site plan. The site plan is correct.)
Requests
VOA is requesting that the City do the following:
1. Vacate the undeveloped alley between Castle Avenue and the vacated Hazel Street.
(See the map on page 16.)
2. Change the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
(See the maps on pages 15 and 16.)
3. Approve fewer parking spaces and garages than the Code requires. The Code
requires that VOA provide 124 parking spaces —two for each living nit. Sixty-two
g tY
of these spaces must be garages. VOA is proposing 40 open parking spaces and no
garages.
4. Approve a variance for the dwelling unit sizes. VOA is proposing that the efficiency
units have 375 square feet and the one - bedroom units have 465 square feet. The
Code requires at least 580 square feet for each unit. VOA is also proposing that the
two- bedroom units have 610 square feet. The Code requires at least 740 square
feet. (See the letter starting on page 23.)
5. Approve a variance to the City's density standard for studio units. The City does
not have a density standard for efficiency units. The City uses 1.1 people per unit
for studio (efficiency) units. VOA is proposing to use one person per unit for their
studio units. (See the letter starting on page 23.)
b. Approve the site plan, grading and drainage plan, landscape plan and building
elevations.
BACKGROUND
The VOA had applied for approval of this project with 66 units in 1993. The Planning
Commission and Community Design Review Board recommended that the Council
approve the project. Because of higher than anticipated costs, the VOA withdrew their
application before City Council action. The previous request included the vacation of
Cope Avenue and the possible purchase of City -owned property to increase the VOA's
site size. VOA is no longer requesting that the City vacate Cope Avenue or buy City
land.
KI
DISCUSSION
Alley Vacation
There is no need for the undeveloped alley on this site. VOA owns the property on both
sides of the alley. The alley vacation would allow them to build the proposed care
facility as shown on the site plan. The City should keep an easement over part of the
east end of the alley for existing underground utilities.
Zoning Map Change
Rezoning the VOA site to R -3 would be consistent with the City's land use plan. The
land use plan shows R -3(H) (residential high density) for this site. (See the land use
plan on page 14).
Parking Authorization
The City has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior
housing developments. (See the parking for other senior projects section on page 11.)
The new VOA building would have less parking per unit than the other senior projects
in the City, but would have the same parking ratio as the recently approved Rosewood
Estates senior project (Lakewood Drive and Maryland Avenue) . Most of the residents at
the VOA project will not drive. Parking is primarily for visitors and staff.
The VOA project is similar to an assisted living project for seniors in Roseville called
Rosewood Estates (associated with the Maplewood Rosewood Estates). This project has
68 units. Staff has visited this project at .different times and _days,. They have had
between 9 and 14 cars parked there. The proposed number of spaces should be enough.
If a problem develops, VOA can add more parking.
Room Size Variances
The City's minimum room size requirements were designed for typical family
apartments. Assisted - living facilities do not require room sizes as large as typical
apartments. Typical apartments have more people per unit than assisted - living facilities.
(See the survey of assisted living room sizes on a e 26 and the typical studio-style
p g � tY
floor plans on page 27.) As stated in the letter on page 24, a single room is easier to
get around in because of the physical or cognitive im of the resident. Another
characteristic of an assisted - living facility is that there is a large amount of social space.
Approximately 50% of the building area would be resident living quarters. 23% or 190
square feet per unit would be common social spaces. The social spaces would include
common areas for dining,, social programs and activities. On December 13, 1994, the
City Council approved floor area variances for Rosewood Estates. Rosewood Estates
proposed 425 square feet for efficiency units and 525 square feet for one - bedroom
3
units. They are building 366- square -foot efficiency units and 454- square -foot one-
bedroom units. They are applying for a new variance for the smaller units.
Density Variance
The applicant has explained that, based on statistical data, efficiency units have a
maximum occupancy between .9 and 1.0 people per unit. (See the occupancy anal si
p p Y y s
chart on page 28.) Maplewood does not have a standard for efficiency units. The City
uses 1.1 persons per unit for one - bedroom units. The applicant's figures are based on
factors unique to this resident profile, such as the turnover rate of units and unexpected
departures for hospitalization. Considering the size of the studio units (375 square feet)
and the nature of the occupants, it does not seem likely that there would be more than
one person residing in each studio unit. The applicant would meet the City's density
pp tY'
requirements for one- and two- bedroom units.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Approve the resolution on page 29. This resolution vacates the undeveloped alley
north of Cope Avenue, between White Bear Avenue and the Maplewood Care
Center. This vacation is subject to the City keeping a drainage and utility easement
over the south 10 feet of the east 30 feet. The City should vacate this alley because
it is in the public interest. It is in the p ublic interest because:
1. There is no need for this alley.
2. The City does not build alleys.
3. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded alleys.
B. Approve the resolution on page 30. This resolution changes the zoning of this
property from R -1 (single- dwelling residential) to R -3 (multiple - family residential).
The City bases this rezoning on the findings required by the City Code and that the
R -3 zoning is consistent with the City's land use plan.
C. Approve the resolution on page 31 which allows 84 fewer parking spaces than
Code requires and no garages, since:
1. Most of the residents would not drive.
2. The City has allowed fewer parking spaces for similar seniors housing
developments.
The property owner shall add off - street parking if the City determines there is not
enough parking. The property owner will at this time delineate the location of 20
additional future parking spaces on the site plan.
4
D. Approve the resolution. on page 32. This resolution approves a 205- square -foot
floor area variance for the studio units, a 115-square-foot floor area variance for
the one - bedroom units and a 130- square -foot floor area variance for the two -
bedroom units. Approval is based on these findings:
1. Common areas compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior - housing facilities than in
conventional apartment buildings.
3. Larger units can be more difficult to get around in for a resident with physical
or cognitive impairment.
4. The City approved floor area variances for Rosewood Estates.
E. Approve the resolution on page 33. This resolution approves a variance to the
City's density standard to use one person per unit for efficiency units. Approval is
based on the following reasons:
1. The applicant presented national statistics showing occupancy rates between .9
and 1.0 people per unit for assisted living efficiency units.
2. The City does not have a standard for efficiency units in senior housing.
F. Approve the site plan, grading and drainage plan, landscape plan and building
elevations (stamped April 13, 1994) for the Maplewood Assisted Care Living
Facility and the changes to the Maplewood Care Center site. The City approves
these plans subject to the following conditions:
1. This review must be repeated in two years if the City has not issued a
building permit for this project.
2. All construction shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes in the plans. The Community Design
Review Board must approve major changes.
3. Complete the following work before occupying the building:
a. Replace property irons that are removed because of this construction.
b. Restore and sod damaged boulevards.
C. Install a handicap- parking sign for each handicap- parking space. Handicap -
parking stalls and signs must follow ADA requirements.
5
d. Install continuous concrete curbing around all new drives and parking
lots.
4. Complete the following for staff approval before the City issues a building
permit:
a. Submit plans for the fence along the east lot line and for the trash -
enclosure.
b. Revise the grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans to reflect
the parking lot design shown on the site plan. The erosion control plan
shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District
Erosion Control Handbook. The utility plan shall show any fire hydrants
required by the City Fire Marshal. The City shall not issue a building
permit until the City Engineer approves this plan.
C. Revise the site plan to show the eight- foot -wide pedestrian trail as a paved
trail.
d. Revise the landscape plan to:
(1) Show the parking layout as proposed on the site plan.
(2) Show a landscape screen south of the existing Maplewood Care
Center parking lot. This landscaping must be at least 80% opaque and
six feet tall. (code requirement)
e. Provide documentation to show that trees will be planted on site at a total
value of at least 1% of the project's construction cost.
5. Parking shall be paved according to the site plan, not the landscaping or
grading plans.
6. If any required work is not done, the City may allow temporary occupancy if:
a. The City determines that the work is not essential to the public health,
safety or welfare.
b. The City receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the
required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished
work.
CI
C. The City receives an agreement that will allow -the ,City to complete any
unfinished work.
7. All work shall follow the approved plans. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor changes.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
We asked the surrounding property owners for their opinion of the previous proposal.
We sent surveys to the property owners within 350 feet of the site. Out of 31
properties, we received 14 replies. Seven were for the proposals, five were against and
two had no comment. We did not send out surveys for the new plan.
Those for the requests had the following comments:
1. It vacates Cope Avenue. Putting the street through would not be in the best
interest of the neighborhood. Also want to know how the lot behind will have
access - from Hazel or van Dyke? They mentioned using the City property on van
Dyke and Cope for a park. Is this in the planning? Nice idea for a small green space
set in kind of a park. I object to any idea of having access to the parking lot on the
south end of the nursing home from Cope Avenue. At the time the nursing home
was built, it was stated that the home would have no access this way. we do not
y
want delivery trucks using the neighborhood streets, nor any other traffic to or
from the home or the new building using it. They should change the south parking
lot of the home to green space and have all parking on the north end. Move the
dumpster out of the south lot also. Make all deliveries from the north side.
(Niezgocki - 2271 Hazel Street)
2. I do not want the traffic Cope Avenue would bring to our street if it were to go
through. (Garry - 2261 Hazel Street)
3. It would be a good buffer zone for Highway 36. (Lockery - 2256 Hazel Street)
4. I would like to see Cope Avenue extended to White Bear Avenue. (Lindgren - 2250
Hazel Street)
5. The assisted living facility would be the most desirable use of the property.
(Anderson - 2249 Craig Place)
Those against the requests had the following comments:
1. When, oh when is the nursing home going to quit making us a "buffer "? We are
not against senior housing per se - against being squeezed out and a lower value of
home - we have realtors proof! The frontage road - cannot hold more traffic - or
for that matter more noise - (from trucks etc.). Their wood fence is not a noise
barrier! ! Right now we have a vacant HUD home at 1922 Castle - another to the
east of us is going soon! Why not have them take the three of us, - and p ut in a
courtyard - and underground tunnel to connect them ?? makes more sense! We will
protest loud and clear. (Thernmes - 1928 Castle Avenue)
8
2. Added traffic on Hazel Street North. (Chicon.is - 2264 Hazel Street)
3. We still would like to see single- dwelling homes in this area.. If that is impossible,
we cannot comment on any plans that the VOA might have without seeing what
they have in mind. Besides, they really haven't been very good nei hbors in that
g
they have not taken very good care of their property and fence alon g Cope a Avenue
and our property line to the point of it being an eyesore in our neighborhood.
What's to stop them from bringing own our neighborhood even more? (Gehrke -
g g
1917 Cope Avenue)
4. I want Cope Avenue to go through to White Bear Avenue. (Bambach - 2256 Craig
Place)
9
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Area:. 2.73 acres (2.87 acres with the bonus allowed for extra landscaping)
Existing land use: Undeveloped
Property Owner: Volunteers of America Care Facilities and Care Centers, Minnesota
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Existing parking lots for Maplewood Care Center
East: Maplewood Care Center and houses on Cope and Castle Avenues. The
Maplewood Care Center is a three -story 156 -bed nursing home.
South: Cope Avenue right -of -way. South of the right -of -way is a house, an
undeveloped lot (privately owned) and City -owned lot on the corner of Cope
Avenue and Van Dyke Street,
West: Castle Avenue (frontage road) and White Bear Avenue
SITE HISTORY
On February 1, 1968, the City Council vacated Hazel Street from Cope to Castle
Avenues.
On June 26, 1969, the City Council approved building and site plans for the Maplewood
Care Center.
On January 20, 1972, the City Council denied the alley vacation. They intended to
review the alley vacation again after the City resolved the question of extending Cope
Avenue. (At the time, the Council was considering whether to build Cope Avenue to
White Bear Avenue.)
On July 11, 1983, the City Council changed the land use plan to delete Cope Avenue as
a collector street from white Bear Avenue to Ariel Street.
On August 28, 1989, the Council gave preliminary approval to VOA's request for
$5,300,000 in tax - exempt financing to buy the Maplewood Care Center. This approval
p pp
was subject to VOA making improvements to the building and site.
On September 25, 1989, the Council vacated Sherren Avenue between white Bear
Avenue and vacated Hazel Street.
10
On December 10, 1990, the Council considered changing the land use plan for the
undeveloped property at the corner of Cope Avenue and Castle Avenue. The change was
from R -3H (high - density residential) to R -1 (low- density residential). The Council
decided not to make this change. The Council gave no reason. The Planning
Commission recommended against a change because noise from White Bear Avenue was
not conducive for single dwellings and the VOA was planning a senior project on this
site. The Council did change the zoning on the Sherren Avenue right -of -way from R -1
to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: R -3H (multiple dwelling)
Density: Proposed - 22.8 persons per : acre (with the landscaping density bonus)
Allowed - 22.8 persons per acre
The VOA is proposing to plant enough trees to for a density credit. The Code allows the
site size to be considered "increased" by 100 square feet per unit, 6,200 square feet in
this instance, if at least 1% of the construction cost is spent on planting trees. This
would increase the site size for density purposes from 2.73 acres to 2.87 acres.
Zoning: R -1 (single dwelling)
Parking at other Seniors - Housing Facilities
The City has approved reduced parking and garage requirements for all past senior
housing. These projects include:
1. Concordia Arms: 100 spaces for 124 units (.8 space per unit)
2. Hazel Ridge: 75 spaces for 75 units (1 space per unit)
3. Casey Lake (never built): 62 spaces for 62 units (1 space per unit)
4. Village on Woodlynn: 87 spaces for 60 units (1.5 spaces per unit)
5. Carefree Cottages of Maplewood: 161 spaces for 106 units (1 space per 1.5 units)
6. Rosewood Estates: 61 spaces for 100 units (.6 spaces per unit)
The VOA project would have 40 spaces for 62 units (.6 space per unit).
Variance Approval Findings
State law requires that the City Council make the following findings to approve a
variance from the zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to
the property under consideration.
11
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship ", as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means the
property in question cannot be p ut to a reasonable use* if used under conditions allowed
by the official controls. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to
his property, not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter
the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the rop e �Y exists under the terms
p
of the ordinance.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ASSISTED CARE LIVING FACILITY
The assisted care living environment respects the individual's right to privacy. It also
works to relieve the stress of the threat of institutionalization b Yp g rovidin a home -like
setting. The proposed facility would be for seniors who now are living with, or getting
help from, family members (being the care givers) . It also is for seniors who are livin
in their own home with no services. Such people often have their health deteriorate
because they do not get the services or help he need. The p facility would not
p Y p p tY
have the extensive regimentation and health professional supervision that a skilled care
nursing facility would provide. The building includes common space with a dining
room, laundry, living rooms, library and a television lounge.
go:b 7:voa4.mem (11)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
3. Property Line /Zoning Map (Existing)
4. Property Line /Zoning Map (Proposed)
5. Site Plan
6. Building Elevations
7. VOA Project Description and Letter of Request dated March 30, 1994
8. VOA Variance Justification Letter dated March 30, 1994
9. Assisted Living Review of Floor Area Chart
10. Typical Floor Plans
11. Occupancy Analysis
12. Alley Vacation Resolution
13. Zoning Map Change Resolution
14. Parking Resolution
15. Floor Area Variance Resolution
16. Density Variance Resolution
17. Site Plan, Grading/Drainage, Building Elevations and Landscaping Plan (Separate
Attachments stamped April 13, 1994)
12
Attachment 1
D
S
d
Markham
3
Po
� O
G
v Z
S
RAOATZ AVE.
RAMSEY
COLWTY i � W
cc NORTH
K '"••
v AVE, La Iv
c,..f
AVE C�
Uke .
�--- . ---. -3 AVE. CORE
t; LARK AVE. J
ix LAUR E . dOe RD*
). lr IE a R RD. 1 1
> 1700 p
[ BURKE/AVE. .
o f
0
3 t ••• •��
c a , 4 ,
HARRIS AVE. ::..
ROSEWOOO AVE. K
ROSE*16�D RAMSEY COUNTY
r • •
AV ' <v AVE. S. K�� A ..
. NORTH S
a }.. V " • •• .• , , • , ., •• �j 0 0 ••e
AVE • •• • • •.• ••• • • �• • • • • • • •AI �� •
ALDO" • • + e. �• • • • • • •• •
• HO u.. OWAY
8 Cow 68 '
W
su mmf-R AVE ANM Q
• " err
LOCATION MAP
4
N.
13
Lti .
:�
9
f• N
•
N
PEMDGIMLL
3
GERti/AtS AVE. •
•.
R0.
CEIYtONT
AVE
)KS
AVE
� BROOKS
m
AVE.
iD(
TWT
AVE.
� Far
�
US
�
�
F
GF.RVNS
IEW
AVE
CT.
DR.
Y
c,..f
AVE C�
Uke .
�--- . ---. -3 AVE. CORE
t; LARK AVE. J
ix LAUR E . dOe RD*
). lr IE a R RD. 1 1
> 1700 p
[ BURKE/AVE. .
o f
0
3 t ••• •��
c a , 4 ,
HARRIS AVE. ::..
ROSEWOOO AVE. K
ROSE*16�D RAMSEY COUNTY
r • •
AV ' <v AVE. S. K�� A ..
. NORTH S
a }.. V " • •• .• , , • , ., •• �j 0 0 ••e
AVE • •• • • •.• ••• • • �• • • • • • • •AI �� •
ALDO" • • + e. �• • • • • • •• •
• HO u.. OWAY
8 Cow 68 '
W
su mmf-R AVE ANM Q
• " err
LOCATION MAP
4
N.
13
.• i
•„
f• N
•
N
TN
GERti/AtS AVE. •
•.
AVE C�
Uke .
�--- . ---. -3 AVE. CORE
t; LARK AVE. J
ix LAUR E . dOe RD*
). lr IE a R RD. 1 1
> 1700 p
[ BURKE/AVE. .
o f
0
3 t ••• •��
c a , 4 ,
HARRIS AVE. ::..
ROSEWOOO AVE. K
ROSE*16�D RAMSEY COUNTY
r • •
AV ' <v AVE. S. K�� A ..
. NORTH S
a }.. V " • •• .• , , • , ., •• �j 0 0 ••e
AVE • •• • • •.• ••• • • �• • • • • • • •AI �� •
ALDO" • • + e. �• • • • • • •• •
• HO u.. OWAY
8 Cow 68 '
W
su mmf-R AVE ANM Q
• " err
LOCATION MAP
4
N.
13
Zfi, gwAnn=
-7m
�4
HE
u I �Itm_
►� .° 1 r is
IT
In
AD
1
dam
•
�� + ♦r•
i s ar�" S
Sri
f lo
r.
Attachment 3
■ � � �' 13 ( 3)
° • �o
(4)
l
• � 9
+ . , 4 14 ( I0
� t
( 7) (IS)
4e LBC ■ ■�
I
1+
RS
■
.y 'l . ,
4 FOREST PRODUCTS 1
91 vp
BALI —HAI
i
##
i
3 E
L
F.4-? we
227 Ct
�o ■ _ �, 2272 2271 =
.� — — '• `� � 1940
w - -- - - - - - T = - - - - 2264 ( 1 6) � - - - — — — 4 t c.. ..
z w ;� � 2 2 6
- �.. 3 .j ! a
2260 ��s� 2261 W a c . 33/0 �GS�
o Z3 2 0 H- _ . �'..__. _ W ( '2262
0
C �b ac 22 6 2255
.0
� 2255 5 � F2
UJ ) 0 - :P! DAYCARE CENTER �C 4 J (5E � e� LARK w 2250 2249 C �
ors � � � � C3 � ♦� �
� m o 'N 224200 c 2241
_• of t a 0 5
. , � .42• r �
R1 SINGLE DWELLINGS R3 = MULTIPLE DWELLINGS NC = NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
PROP LINE /ZONING MAP
-
(EXISTING)
PROPOSED ZONING MAP CHANGE (Rt TO 143)
4
N
15
pv
10
!
1925 1933
1941
■
y�
4&
■
HIGHWAY 36 n
r -
N G
■ ■ !
4 302 3Z --9.
We He
S
7 r.f
430L3&
-
`
•
o
08
N 40
+ 05
o
I ISO
t 1 !t
_
t9
rta 12 G
1
o .
2
25
•.
I i
7
2 2a 2
•
•
�I 5
6
7
8 9
W (7
1922
Co" i o
L
z 4� r
�.
IL
(�� .� r.
z - - -- -
v
- • "^
« o
- 4-
otro
-
Z -
W 3
..
VAGA T
NCI M
r �,
r
32
-
5.2 1
i
##
i
3 E
L
F.4-? we
227 Ct
�o ■ _ �, 2272 2271 =
.� — — '• `� � 1940
w - -- - - - - - T = - - - - 2264 ( 1 6) � - - - — — — 4 t c.. ..
z w ;� � 2 2 6
- �.. 3 .j ! a
2260 ��s� 2261 W a c . 33/0 �GS�
o Z3 2 0 H- _ . �'..__. _ W ( '2262
0
C �b ac 22 6 2255
.0
� 2255 5 � F2
UJ ) 0 - :P! DAYCARE CENTER �C 4 J (5E � e� LARK w 2250 2249 C �
ors � � � � C3 � ♦� �
� m o 'N 224200 c 2241
_• of t a 0 5
. , � .42• r �
R1 SINGLE DWELLINGS R3 = MULTIPLE DWELLINGS NC = NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
PROP LINE /ZONING MAP
-
(EXISTING)
PROPOSED ZONING MAP CHANGE (Rt TO 143)
4
N
15
Attachment.
( 4) 13 ( 3)
a ,o
t 3 010 , to wmm
�` • 10 9
,4 14 (4)
C
,
s
�xx 6 � v
FOREST PRODUCTS
t O Fo
�,
CU6 T
� �� 1 tt 1925 1933 1941
HIGHWAY 36 r
� MEIN I N G
_ G� 43 232 � .
• � -- Y FSM? .
. 14 T
11 W e H
, T. 430t
S • i
• / o
150 led
• +11 17 19 1 2 25 7282
W •
°• sue•. • 5 6 7 8 9! i 4)
� I — 1922 �
v W 3 VAGA T r Lm 3 2 _
• .
PROPOSED ALLEY VACATION 6 5 4 3 2 t �r 1 i: Q 1 12 11 10 9 7 4 3 ;
_ t7
(71) 00
•~ •• r
BALI _ HA! to 2021 r r .. • 1917 1937
! t9 25 7 '16 17 1.9 I 7 28 2
t7 23 24 «) 7 i Z
.... 6 '' . •.. ., C ?
A go
mot' Aa ,c r •
i
��� ��� ■ � ■ � �•�'� ■�` ■�"'� � COPE AVENUE �
r , ?.s ____*•
' •. - • 5 � • • t4 a i O I • • 3 a . _ a • • ' l 1 Q
2271 � IS 2272 � I
i 03 )
03 3„ 2272 2271 W
^ �.. _ _.l._ _ _.._ • ! 1940
ui
2264 .1�9 a
— , — — — — — 001 15 4_7 a — oo _ _ ..
W �. C 2263 � a
°Z C4 ." 2260 a
(ts � 2261 W a s3) a 0�
o Z 2 0 , h- 4 � ._._. __ w� _ .._ � n 1 ."2262 '
� � � �b � 2256 225 .
I 2255 �.. 5 a c 4 ) "
'r A. DAYCARE CENTER yC 4 225E . . AL a LARK . •
w 2250 2249 • . •, •
roc a ��� ,
22420 0 1 2241 j
�, ■� tit
R1 = SINGLE DWELLINGS R3 = MIULTIPLE DWELLINGS NC = NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL_
LBC = LIMITED BUSINESS COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
(PROPOSED)
4
N
16
Attachment. 5
---- -- a t
r
ANA PA
'
I'
/ � lwttl�OA
/ UV- i
rAb
ore.a•r� 3 "RRS H AVENUE Q , EXISTMG
PAtC AIWA •
40\ oleo'• \O\ �Y �°M' �.a o F CARE loth •..d o*w
too a to t i 1*y ow _ w /
OAJIN O "as � ) 1 �M w= RKt
t/1'Itam Yip 1 le ,
is r ( t'
1
v/ c y �/ w
MON c!
V
N
I . � I ttlV�
1 100/ow"
/I YI 1 PMR M AIIA 1 r �� \ to 1 p R \r6
1 ,L ` 1
of
,,. 100 \ 1
IN PAINIC&O AMA
NEW a fir
A"ISTED ,.
LIYNG r,
FACILt1Y
� � � , l �\ � �,• if •. \ .� M \ «w� _ C� �\
lwwwq
tit f
---__ _ _ ___ _ _• - _ _ _ �•- 1�Iro M AMA _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - i �.� - \a ,1 - _ _ - ___. .
-� •w•1r
l COPE AVENS WGWT CF WAY t � \
t 1
1 1
I ( ! I • PARKING DATA
•rww rEa t.n w
to rr t e
a�rw.•a t►acts tt
_ Tarr
in w p
SITE PLAN -
sckf 1'.30 -r �'
tor,r< Ma0l1 pIWOtC 10* 41 . rt
tat fp sm t o 001 CAN Comm • M
tala, . W
VOOD ASSEM WNG
a ,o MAR. MM, MMESOTA ; .. •
5200 OTC Paricwar
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA & ' 6
Calondt► eom
SITE MAP
17
4
N
--I— _U — i ce .
go
02:
see
-- -- ......
Fr i:: as
is -- 2 me iii ; �=�• 'se ; .. ii3 F w• • ... � . a 1f '.. ��Iw•� ®.w. a i. � Innnnl a. nnnuu�.l u uunl i III >< �. (' a Il�llnutulll tununllllluunuutl►utnnln I I I I j e
jjbjj
bee 001. =2 see m iiF FF: »� Lil
E
-- - - - - -- -- __ - IN lu uunnuln l ununinl a meba
adbm
Sees
gel i uuuulnn U unllnnul (iuuululul
imm me.
H H' Hi I
:1 Ha: M as
TKIMP 4.z
Err,
He I H. g gi LLEJ:
..... ......
IBM
... lit W ... ... ...
BE @I
Aa. or
I ! Illltllll IIIIIIIII !���! IIII111111111111111 I I, ���-- :.� --':`� —'—' ! IIIIIIIIII ;I IIIIIIII I'f lllllllll — � F " = 2 .'... *0 sea
Iowa
some
loss Z
1 p a, -no on. in
fin — 11 in it I -_; ! r t
L
r a-- i— awe
-;:, M 0 10,
C:
::we
momeas
see
is M
a
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
0
:11111911► lel:o I Awlivi I If
Attachment 7
Lantz Bo Architects Pc.'
5200 DTC Parkway
Suite 500
Englewood, Colorado
80111
(303)773 -0436
fax(303)773 -8709
Mr. Geoff Olson March 30, 1994
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Maplewood Assisted Living Facility
Dear Mr. Olson:
Pursuant to our meeting with you in your office on March 22, 1994 and our
confirmation letter dated March 24, 1994 of that meeting, we are herewith
forwarding all materials we believe are required to comprise a complete submittal.
9 P P
Enclosed for your review are seven (7) copies of the current Site Plan (all
previously submitted Site Plans should be discarded). The previously submitted
Landscape Plans, Building Elevations and Drainage Report remain current.
_s
The project description is as follows:
VOA Care Centers of Minnesota (VOA) is proposing to build a 62-
unit Assisted Care Living Facility. This facility would be on a 2.73
acre site (without Cope Avenue vacated), that is north of the Cope
Avenue right -of -way and east of White Bear Avenue. The building
would be three stories high. There would be 53 alcove (studio)
units, 6one - bedroom units and 3two- bedroom units. The siding
would be vinyl with brick accents (see attached plans). There would
be a tunnel (approximately 800 square feet) connecting the new
facility with the existing Care Center. VOA also plans to build an
eight -foot wide paved trail along their south property line.
The care available at this facility would be between that at a nursing
home and that available at housing for independent seniors. The
assisted care living facility would provide minimal aid for daily living
to the residents. This would include help with housekeeping,
laundry, bathing, mobility, medication management, social events,
nutritional or other needs.
19
Mr. Geoff Olson
March 28, 1994
Page 2
VOA- is proposing the following changes to '
g g he existing Maplewood Care Center
site: (VOA owns the Maplewood Care Center.
10 Provide a new wooden fence enclosure .around the trash area at the west
side of the south parking lot.
2. .Replace the wooden fence aloe •
• n g the east lot line with a solid, eight-foot-tall
wooden screening-fence.
g
g e.
3. Remove the wooden fence aloe the side north side of Cope Avenue and
landscape this area.
4. Revise the Sherren Avenue driveway a n d nd parking. There are 27 e x ist ing
. the south side
parking spaces along e of this drive. VOA proposes to add
more asphalt and restripe this drive for 10 arkin s
p g paces and a passenger
drop -off area along the south side and 18 parking •
� p ng spaces on the. north side
of this driveway. VOA also lans to narrow t '
P he drive entrance from 33
feet to 24 feet.
.r
Note: The existing and ro osed parking •
P P p g are shown on the site plan.
There are currently 94 parkin spaces for the
g p existing Care Center. Upon
completion of the new Assisted Living Facilit p arking king area, plus the
Sherren Avenue revisions, the total arkin •
p g count for both buildings
combined will be 134 spaces. Out of that total 40
spaces will be for the
A.
L.F., leaving 94 spaces (current total for the ) Care Center.
VOA is requesting that the City o the following:
Y
1. Vacate the undeveloped alley between P y n Castle Avenue and the vacated
Hazel Street.
2. Change the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple
dwellings).
3. Approve fewer parkin spaces and a
g P garages than the Code requires. The
r
Code requires that VOA provide 124 a •
. P parking spaces -two for each liven
unit. Sixty-two of theses aces g
p must be in garages. VOA is p ropo sing g g p p sing 40
open parking spaces and no garages.
20-
Mr. Geoff Olson
March 28, 1994
Page 3
4. Recognize that VOA intends to utilize a Density Credit for landscaping by
planting trees on site at a total value of 1% of the construction costs. In
so doing per the zoning ordinance, the effective site area can be increased
by 100 s.f. per dwelling unit, or 62 units x 100 s.f. = 6200 s.f.
5. Grant a variance on the square footage of the dwelling units. See attached
letter containing support data for this request,
6. Grant a variance relative to density for people per unit (Reference Zoning
Ordinance Table 5 - Estimated Persons Per Dwelling Unit and Planned
Maximum Density of Dwelling Units). We understand the Studio Units are
considered at a rating of 1.1 people per unit, and we request a variance for
Studio Units to be considered at a rating of 1.0 people per unit. The 1
Bedroom Units would remain at 1.1, and the 2 Bedroom Units would
remain at 2.0. See attached letter containing justification for this request.
If this variance is granted, the site density (people per acre) would be
calculated as follows:
Unit Type People/Unit Total People
53 Studios 1.0 53.0
6 1 Bedroom 1.1 6.6
3 2 Bedroom 2.0 6.0
Total 62 Units 65.6 People
Actual Site Acreage = 2.73 acres
(without vacation of . Cope Avenue).
)
Landscape Density Credit = .14 acres
(6200 s.f. = . 14 acres ) (See Item 4 above
Total Site Area = 2.87 acres
2.87 acres x 22.8 people /acre allowed = 65.4 people
Summary: 65.4 people allowed
65.6 people actual
Per our phone conversations, if the actual number of people is within .5 of
the number allowed, it is determined to be acceptable.
21
Mr. Geoff Olson
March 28, 1994
Page 4
7. Approve the plans for a new assisted care living
g building and changes to
the Maplewood Care Center site.
It is our understanding that this letter, along ith the '
g attached justification : data,
site plan, Variance Application and recording ees render o '
g our application current
and complete. Please advise us if ou require an further '
Y q y r mformatlon.
- Sincerely,
Lantz- Boggio Architects, P.C.
J y . Shera
sec anager
`- - - -- - - uck Gould, Nal unteers of -
Dennis Boggio, Lantz - Boggio Architects
22
Attachment 8
Lantz P.
5200 DTC Parkway
Suite 500
Englewood, Colorado
80111
(303)773 -0436
fax(303)773 -8709
Mr. Geoff Olson March 30, 1994
Director of Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
a RE: Maplewood Assisted Living Facility
Dear Mr. Olson:
This letter is to serve as justification for our request for variances to your zoning
ordinance on two issues:
1. Floor area of individual dwelling units, ordinance 36- 122(b) "Density
and Area Requirements ".
2. Density for People Per Unit, Ordinance Table 5 - "Estimated Persons
Per Dwelling Unit and Planned Maximum Density f Dwelling Units ".
ty g
Regarding Item 1, the ordinance requires as a minimum 580 square feet for
Efficiency and One Bedroom Units, and 740 square feet for Two Bedroom Units.
We are requesting approval of 375 square feet for Efficiencies, 465 square feet for
One Bedroom Units and 610 square feet for Two Bedroom Units.
Our request is based upon occupancy of the building by seniors, particularl
Assisted Living residents. The typical Assisted Living resident is between 85 and
95 years old whose characteristics include P h y impairment, sical cognitive
impairment, or both. Generally a resident needs assistance with the activities of
daily living including bathing, grooming, eating, toileting, mobilit etc.
23
Mr. Geoff Olson
March 30, 1994
Page 2
The apartment or personal residence of a typical Assisted Living resident can be
detrimental if the unit is too large. Generally, because of physical or cognitive
impairment, a single room unit is the easiest to negotiate. We have therefore
sized the units within this project to be optimum for the resident profile being
served.
An important component in the Assisted Living concept is the common space or
public space within the building. It is within these spaces that residents take meals
and participate regularly in daily social programs and activities. These spaces are
an extension of the personal living environment. In the proposed project, the
social spaces and non - dwelling spaces account for approximately 50% of the
building and the dwelling units make up the remaining 50 %.
Based upon this ratio, the amount of space devoted to each dwelling unit is
approximately twice the actual individual unit area. The building has an overall
area of 51,000 s.f. which equates to an average of 822 gross s.f. per dwelling unit.
Given the concept of Assisted Living, we believe that it Would be impractical an' d
non- responsive to meet the letter of the City Ordinance with regard to individual
unit areas which creates an undue hardship for the project. We therefore request
a variance on areas of the individual units be granted. It is important to point out
that this variance will not alter the essential character of the area and the variance
would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Ordinance in that the area
of the building including public living and social spaces is 822 s.f.
Regarding Item 2, we are requesting that Efficiency Units be considered at a
rating of 1.0 in lieu of the 1.1 rating currently in Table 5.
The justification for this request is based on statistical d to of Assisted Living
Facilities nationwide. The actual occupancy of all units combined (Efficiencies,
p
One Bedrooms and Two Bedrooms), on a national average basis, ranges from 1.0
to 1.6. However, considering Efficiency units only, statistics show that the total
maximum occupancy falls between .90 and 1.0 people. These figures are
calculated utilizing factors characteristic of the resident profile, such as the
turnover rate of units and unexpected departures for hospitalization.
LQ 24
Mr. Geoff Olson
March 30, 1994
Page 3
One additional hardship reated b the 1.1 rating being '
P Y g g applied to the Efficiency
Units is that they only return revenues at a ratin g of 1.0.
There are no additional negative impacts to the City of Ma plewood P ty p with regard
to traffic and services; indeed, the project has fewer demands on infrastructure and
services than other multi -unit or multi- family developments. We believe this
request does not violate the spirit of the Ordinance since the actual occupancy of
p cY
.the units is generating the site density alculations. We
• . � , therefore request a
variance on the people per Efficiency Unit be granted.
Sincerely,
Lantz- Boggio Architects, P.C.
J ianager hera, ALA,
r j ct
LQ
25
Attachment 9
Assi.rtedLiving �eviezv 1
ftoje c t
# Vnits
Sq , T
Ra Ranw e
Elder Homestead
29
440
$1,737 - $2
1400
1. 4th S #. N.
Minnetonka
Th Gardens a t Gideon n Pond
86
_�•
454 95.2
.........
$1,750 - $2
10030 Newton Ave S
Bloomington
The ... Eve ............................................................................................................
re en so f Ea t1 B
Brow Evergreens n Farm
90 •.
...............................
_
.. 399
� -�� 1
$1,595 $1
6001 Earle Brown Dr.
Brooklyn Center
Mea dow Wood
. s
109
270-425
.i. •i•:
:..
•••$ • 1�,370.�- ��
1301 E. 100th St.
Bloomington
.:............................ .............. ................................
MN M asonic nic Home
............... ......................
46 .
...26 . 3 .. -• 464 ...... .
..$1��,.350 :: $ : 1 . , : g5 : p� :
11400 Normandale Blvd.
Bloomington
......................................::.:............................................................................................
Re mb ra ndt Ret nement Community •
210
. 0 - ��4
..........................
���$757� -���$1 436
3434 Heritage Drive
Bloomington
:.... .....
Walker
Elder s uites . s
...............................
72
298 • -700 °.
$�1��,�750 ., $2 • � . 1�75� :
7400 York Ave. s.
Edina
.
n P ark Co mmons
.......... .............
40
384-621
$1 �$1
490 East Lynnhurst
St. P
i ..
..............
Madan Center 30
. ......
-
250 375
..
.. ...............................
� 4 $1,516
200 Earl Street
t
St. Paul
............ ............ ;:� :• .
Royce Place 50 275-400. 890 -...
$ $1,360
1515 44th Ave NE
Columbia Heights
Rosewood Estate
106
363- ?
.i.
$1 • $2
2750 N. Victoria
Roseville
... . . .
::.:...................::...........:.:...:::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Eagle Crest The Commons" 91 461 -1034 . $1,750 - $2,600
2945 Lincoln Dr. N
Roseville
Lak eview � Residence si
denc
e 178 ... 250- 375 °. .:. $900��- ��$1
3320 Lake Johanna Blvd.
Arden Hills
_ ...
........................:5.:...
Prepared By Senior Innovations, Inc
26
Studio -Style Suites
Attachment 10
FLOOR PLAN: 1 B / 1 C
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 360
27
FLOOR PLAN: 1A
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 270 :..,
4.:
FLOOR PLAN: 1 D
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 355
FLOOR PLAN: 1 E
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 390
Attachment 11
Assisted Living Studio Apartment
Occupancy Analysis
Project Studio Potential
[Total er of Studio (Efficiency Units) 53
pancy Days Per Year 365
Potential Occu anc Days 19,345
Vacancy Loss
Loss from Turnover
Average Annual Studio Turnover Rate
o
60 /o
Annual Projected Units Turned over
32
Days Lost per Unit Turnover
14
Total Annual days Lost to Turnover
445
Percentage Loss
2.30%
Loss from Illness and Rehab
Number of Studio Units
53
Average Days Lost per Unit/Year
7
Annual Loss from Illness and Rehab
371
Percentage Loss
1
{
Total Projected Loss
-r 4.22 /o
-4.22%
Occupancy Index
Projected Occupants Per Unit 1.02
Less Erojecte Loss From Above 0,04
Projected Occupancy Ratio 0.98
The above occupancy loss is based on the ro'ect
p J
achieving full occupancy. Most mature ro'ects
p J
experience stabilized occupancy not greater than 95 %.
Prepared By Senior Innovations, Inc
28
Attachment 12
ALLEY VACA710N RESOLUT10N
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America (VOA) is requesting that the City vacate the
following described alley:
All the alley between Lots 1 -12 and Lots 18 -27 in Block 9, Dearborn Park between
the vacated Hazel Street and the east line of the right -of -way for White Bear Avenue.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. A majority of the property owners abutting this alley signed a petition for this
vacation;
2. On June 20, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve this vacation.
3. On July 25, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the abutting
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak
and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission,
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will
go to the following abutting properties:
Lots 1 -9, Block 9 (including vacated Hazel Street accruing) and Lots 18 -27,
Block 9 (including vacated Hazel Street accruing), Dearborn Park.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described vacation for the following reasons:
1. There is no need for this alley.
2. The City does not build alleys.
3. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded alleys.
The Maplewood City Council approved ' this resolution on , 19946
29
Attachment 13
RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America (VOA) applied for a change in the zoning map
from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies.. to the property located east of White Bear Avenue and
between the vacated Sherren and Cope Avenues. The legal description is:
Lots 1 -27, Block 9, Dearborn Park (including streets and alleys accruing thereto).
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. Can June 20, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the change.
20 On July 25, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing, The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the
zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the
use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan
is adequately safeguarded.
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,
and economical ex�ension of public services and facilities, such as public water,
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
5. The proposed change would be consistent with the existing land use plan
designation for this property.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on $ 1994.
30
Attachment 14
RESOLUTION: PARKING REDUCTION
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America (VOA) applied for 84 fewer parking spaces
than the Code requires and no garages.
WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located east of White Bear Avenue and
between the vacated Sherren and Cope Avenues... The legal. description is:
Lots 1 -27, Block 9, Dearborn Park (including streets and alleys accruing thereto).
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On June 20, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the change.
2. On July 25, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surroundin
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports And
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. Most of the residents would not drive.
2. The City has allowed fewer parking spaces for similar seniors housing
developments.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. The property owner shall add off -street parking if the City determines there is not
enough parking.
2. The property owner will at this time delineate the location of 20 additional future
parking spaces on the site plan.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 1994-
31
Attachment 15
FLOOR AREA VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Volunteers. of America applied for a variance from the floor area
requirements in the zoning ordinance.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to the property east of White Bear Avenue and
between the vacated Sherren and Cope Avenues. The legal description is:
Lots 1 -27, Block 9, Dearborn Park (including streets and alleys accruing thereto).
WHEREAS, Section 36- 122(b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires that
the minimum habitable floor area for efficiency and one - bedroom units is 580 square
feet and that the minimum for two - bedroom units is 740 square feet.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing that the efficiency units have 375 square feet,
that the one - bedroom units have 465 square feet and that the two - bedroom units have
610 square feet.
WHEREAS, this requires variances of 205, 115 and 130 square feet.
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On June 20, 1994, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve this variance.
20 On July 25, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property . owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described variance for the following reasons:
1. Common areas compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior - housing facilities than in conventional
apartment buildings.
3. Larger units can be more difficult to get around in for a resident with physical or
cognitive impairment.
4. The City approved floor area variances for Rosewood Estates.
The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 19940
32
Attachment 16
DENSITY VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America applied for a variance from the density
requirements in the City's Comprehensive Plan.
WHEREAS, this variance applies to the property east of White Bear Avenue and
between the vacated Sherren and Cope Avenues. The legal description is:
Lots 1 -27, Block 9, Dearborn Park (including streets and alleys accruing thereto).
WHEREAS, Table 5 of the Maplewood Comprehensive Plan does not have a standard
for efficiency units.
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing a density calculation for the efficiency units of
1.0 persons per unit..
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On June 24, 1994, the Pla "1 g Commission recommended that the City Council
approve this variance.
2. On July 25, 1994, the City Council held a public hearing. The City staff
published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding
property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described variance for the following reasons:
1. The applicant presented national statistics showing occupancy rates between .9 and
1.0 people per unit for assisted living efficiency units.
2. The City does not have a standard for efficiency units in senior housing.
The Maplewood City Council approved this variance on , 19940
33
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 6 -20 -94
The Commission directed staff to k% the r esults of the voting to the City Council and
request that the Council make twntments to the Planning Commission.
B. Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility —White Bear & Cope Avenue: Alley p y
Zoning Map Change, Parking Reduction, Floor Area Variances Densit Va
.ante
(Section 11)
Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered questions from the
Commission.
Jeff Schera, 4767 South Zena Street, Aurora, Colorado, the architect for this project,
explained the proposal. Mr. Schera said their proposed landscape plan for the south
property shows a berm and trees between the existing parking lot and the property
line. He explained that the existing 6 -foot fence on the, east property line will be
replaced with an 8 -foot fence.
The Commission discussed the proposed room sizes and the sizes of the co mmon
areas of this project compared with other existin g g assisted -livin facilities. Some
Commissioners considered the size of the proposed rooms to be too small. The y also
said that the total area considered common area could not entirely e c onsidered onsidered as
usable living area, since it includes closets, s hallwa and all other space.
ace. p
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Approval of the resolution which vacates the undeveloped alley north of Cope
Avenue, between White Bear Avenue and the Maplewood Care Center. This
vacation is subject to the City keeping a drainage and utility easement over the
south 10 feet of the east 30 feet. The City should vacate this alley because it is in
the public interest. It is in the public interest because:
1. There is no need for this alley.
2. The City does not build alleys.
3. The City has a policy of vacating unneeded alleys.
Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes - -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
B. Approval of the resolution which changes the zoning f this property from R -1
g p pe �
(single- dwelling residential) to R -3 (multiple-family residential . The Ci base ) City s
this rezoning on the findings required b the City code and that the R -3 zoning Y tY orung is
consistent with the City's land use plan.
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 6 -20 -94
Commissioner Rossbach seconded Ayes - -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend:
C. Approval of the resolution which allows 84 fewer parking spaces than code
requires and no garages, since:
1. Most of the residents would not drive.
2, The City has allowed fewer parking spaces for similar seniors housing
developments.
The property owner shall add off - street parking if the City determines there is
not enough parking. The property owner will at this time delineate the location
of 20 additional future parking spaces on the site plan.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes- -all
The motion passed. .
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
D. Approval of the resolution which approves a 205- square -foot floor area variance
for the studio units, a 115-square-foot floor area variance for the one - bedroom
units and a 130- square -foot floor area variance for the two - bedroom units.
Approval is based on these findings.
1. Common areas compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior - housing facilities than in
conventional apartment buildings.
3. Larger units can be more difficult to get around in for a resident with
physical or cognitive im airment.
p
4. The City approved floor area variances for Rosewood Estates.
Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes -- Fischer
Nays-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Gerke, Martin,
Rossbach, Sigmundik
The motion failed.
Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the City Council
allow floor -area variances which would be comparable to variances approved for
Rosewood Estates.
Planning Commission -5-
Minutes of 6 -20 -94
Commissioner Martin seconded Ayes - -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
E. Approval of the resolution which approves a variance to the City's density
standard to use one person per unit for efficiency units. Approval is based on the
following. reasons:
1. The applicant presented national statistics showing occupancy rates between .9
and 1.0 person per unit for assisted living efficiency units.
2. The City does not have a standard for efficiency units in senior housing.
Commissioner Gerke seconded
Ayes -- Fischer, Axdahl, Gerke
Nays -- Rossbach, Martin, Anitzberger,
Sigmundik
The motion failed.
VI. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There ere no visitor prese ations.
VII. COMMIS ION PRESENT TIONS
A. June 13 ouncil M eting: Commissioner Rossbach reported on this meeting
B. Representati f the June 27 Council Meeting: Commissioner Fischer
VIII. STAFF PRESENT I S
There were no presen`t�tions.
IX. ADJQURNME
Meeting adjo ed at 10:30 p.m.
Planning Commission
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
5.* Give the City wetland easements over the two wetlands. These easements
shall cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet surrounding a
wetland. The eas ment shall prohibit any building or structures within
twenty feet of the wetland or any owing, cutting, filling or dumping within
ten feet of the we d or within e wetland itself. The purpose of this
easement is to prot t the Ovate quality of the wetlands from homeowners'
fertilizer and to prot t the w land habitat from residential encroachment.
If the developer decides to $plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may
waive any conditions that do of apply to the final plat.
*The developer must co m ete ese conditions before the City issues a grading
permit or approves the al pla
Commissioner Fischer/seconded
Commissioner Kit dge suggested th %Se e trail would be better served if located
from the Bitters et Lane cul -de -sac he Flandrau Street cul -de -sac and then
went between is 13 and 14 of the sons Pa rk Addition.
The ComminTon voted as follows:
Ayes-- Anitberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson
Nays-- I*tridge
Thegeforion passed.
Vi. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Maplewood Assisted Care Living Facility (Section 11)
Secretary Olson presented the staff report and answered questions from the
Commission.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission reconsider items D and E of
the staff report recommendation.
Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes- -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
Planning Commission -7-
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
D. Approval of the resolution which approves a 205 - square -foot floor area variance
for the studio units, a 115 -s q care -foot floor area variance for the one- bedroom
units and a 130 - square -foot floor area variance for the two- bedroom units.
Approval is based on these, findings:
1. Common areas compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior housing facilities than in
conventional apartment buildings.
3. Larger units can be more difficult to get around in for a resident with
physical or cognitive impairment.
4. The City approved floor area variances for Rosewood Estates.
E. Approval of the resolution which approves a variance to the City's density
standard to use one person per unit for efficiency units. Approval is based on the
following reasons:
1. The applicant presented national statistics showing occupancy rates between
.9 and 1.0 person per unit for assisted living efficiency units.
2. The City does not have a standard for efficiency units in senior housing.
In addition, the City Council should reconsider the City ordinances regarding floor
area and density requirements regarding senior and assisted living facilities, since
these facilities are different than conventional apartment buildings.
Commissioner Pearson seconded Ayes -- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost,
Kittridge, Pearson
Nays- -Gerke
The motion passed.
VII NEW BUSINESS
A. Floor Area ariance: Ro wood Estates (Section 25)
Secretary Olson es nted the staff report. Kirk Velett, BRW Elness Architects, spoke
representing Rose d Estates. Mr. Velett explained that the building itself has not
been changed, b rat r the size of the floor areas and the size of the variance. Tony
Schuster, of Ros wood states, also spoke.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Maplewood City Council invites you to a public hearing. This hearing is about a
request to build a 62 -unit assisted -care living facility. The applicant is Volunteers of
America (VOA). The location would be north of the Cope Avenue right -of -way and east
of White Bear Avenue. The Council will hold this hearing on Monday, July 25, 1994 at
7:00 p.m. or later in the City Hall Council Chambers (1830 East County Road B).
VOA is requesting the following:
1. Vacate the undeveloped alley between Castle Avenue and the vacated Hazel Street,
2. Change the zoning map from R -1 (single dwellings) to R -3 (multiple dwellings).
3. Approve fewer parking spaces and garages than the code requires. The code
requires that VOA provide 124 parking spaces -two for each living unit. Sixty -two of
these spaces must be garages. VOA is proposing 40 open parking spaces and no
garages.
4. Approve a variance for the dwelling nit sizes. VOA '
g A is proposing that the efficiency
units have 375 square feet and the one- bedroom units have 465 square feet. the
code requires at least 580 square feet for each uni •
t. VOA is also proposing that the
two- bedroom units have 610 square feet. The code
feet.
q requires at least 740 square
5. Approve a variance to the Cites density standard for studio units. The City does
not have a density standard for efficiency units. The City uses 1.1 people per unit
for studio (efficiency) units. VOA is proposing to use one person per unit for their
studio units.
The City Council will consider these proposed changes or other appropriate changes.
Call Geoff Olson at 770 =4562 for more information,
Sign language interpreters are available. You m •
must request this service at least 96 hours
in advance. Call 770 -4524 to make arran eme
g nts.
PUBLISH: July 13, 1994
MEMORANDUM Aatian �� counei�, -.!
xidorsed
M odif ied-- , .
T City Manager Reject
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand Associate
e Planner Dat
SUBJECT: Floor Area Variance
LOCATION: Southeast corner '
of Lakewood Drive and Ma Avenue
APPLICANT: CARE I �
In stitute, Inc. - Maplewood
PROTECT: Rosewood Estate of Maplewoo
p d
DATE: June 28, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Request
Kirk Velett, of BRW Elness Architects Inc., is requesting that the City Council revise the
floor area variances they granted for Rosewood Estates. Mr. Velett is requesting
approval of the following minimum floor areas: 395 square feet for the efficiency units
and 470 square feet for the one bedroom units. (See his letter on page 9.)
The staff has calculated slightly smaller room sizes. The zoning code requires that we
use the Uniform Building Code's (UBC) definition of floor area. The UBC definition
includes the floor area within the exterior walls.. We are interpreting the exterior walls
as the exterior walls of each unit. We included the interior walls of the one - bedroom
units. The applicant's calculation for floor area includes the outside of exterior walls
and measures to the center line of parry walls. Based on the UBC definition, the
efficiency units would have 366 square feet and the smallest one - bedroom unit would
have 454 square feet.
Reason for the Request
Mr. Velett explained in his letter (page 9) that the floor areas he proposed during our
initial review were average sizes for the efficiency and one - bedroom units. He did not
realize that the City must deal with the minimum_sizes proposed. Since that time,.
Rosewood Estates decided to build all the efficiency units with one size. The staff found
this discrepancy while reviewing afloor -area variance request by the Volunteers of
America (VOA). The VOA is proposing a similar facility by Highway 36 and White Bear
Avenue.
Project Description
Rosewood Estates is a 100 -unit assisted -care senior housing facility. It would provide
less care than found at . a nursing home, but more care than found at housing for
independent seniors, such as the cottages projects. It is for the frail elderly and would
provide daily -living aid to the residents. This includes help with housekeeping, laundry,
bathing, mobility, medication management, social events, nutritional or other needs.
Rosewood Estates is under construction.
BACKGROUND
On December 13, 1993, The City Council approved floor area variances for Rosewood
Estates. Council allowed the efficiency units to have 425 square feet and the one-
bedroom units to have 525 square feet. The Code requires 580 square feet for both
types of units. The City Council also approved:
1. 139 fewer parking spaces than the Code required and no garages since most of the
residents would not drive.
2. Site and building design plans.
DISCUSSION
The applicant needs variances of 214 square feet for the efficiency units and 126 square
feet for the smallest one - bedroom units. These proposed variances are 59 square feet
and 71 square feet greater than the previously granted variances. The City Council
approved the previous variances on the basis .that:
1. There are common areas that compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior - housing facilities than in conventional
apartment buildings.
The reasons for approval have not changed, even though the amount of variance is
greater. The larger amount of common area for socialization in a facility like this
(19% or 156 square feet per unit) offsets the smaller room sizes. Typical apartments
need more floor area in the apartment units because those buildings do not have this
common area. In typical apartments, floor space is comprised of apartment space, utility
rooms and hallways.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the, resolution on page 11. This resolution approves a 214 - square -foot floor area
variance for the efficiency units and a 126 - square -foot floor area variance for the
one - bedroom units. Approval is based on these findings:
1. There are common areas that compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior - housing facilities than in conventional
apartment buildings.
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Area: 5 acres
Existing land use: Rosewood Estates (under construction)
Property Owner: Care Institute, Inc. - Maplewood
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Undeveloped land and Beaver Lake Manufactured Home Park across Maryland
Avenue
East: Undeveloped land that the City has planned and zoned for multiple - family
residential development.
South: Undeveloped land that the City has planned and zoned for multiple - family
residential development.
West: Ramsey County Open Space and Beaver Lake across Lakewood Drive
PLANNING
Land Use Plan designation: R-3(H) (multiple dwellings - 9.5 to 16.3 units per acre).-
Zoning: R3 (multiple dwelling residential)
Ordinance Requirement
Section 36- 122(b). Minimum Habitable Floor Area. The minimum habitable floor area
for efficiency and one - bedroom units is 580 square feet.
Floor Area Definition (UBC)
The area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building or portion
thereof, exclusive of vent shafts and courts.
Criteria for Variance Approval
State law requires that the City Council make the following findings to approve a
variance from the zoning code:
1. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to
the property under consideration.
3
2. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship", as used in connection with the granting. variance, a vaance, means the
property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use • •
e if used under conditions .allowed
by the official controls. The li ht of the p g landowner is due to c
ircumstances unique to
his property, not created by the lando q weer, and the variance, if granted, will not alter
the essential character of the locality. Economic '
t nonuc considerations. alone .shall not
constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the
of the or ' of exists under. the terms
dinance.
go:b- 7:rosewod2.mem (25)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Land Use Plan Map
30 Property Line /Zoning Map
4. Proposed Site Plan
S. Letter dated June 25, 1994
6. Letter dated November 17, 1993
7. Resolution
4
Attachment 1
• IARPENTEUR AVE
o IOAWO AVE. ..:
O }. . •• . Q
w �
7 ,. • IrAOtJ?At AVE. .: •
•
•
•0• •
• '
O
• • • 1 � OR
NEBFiA.SKA J AVE. • OtESCOok OR
3 pvcwr Oft
Oft
CT
• Mr�r�
31 ItOLLJK Hals Co
OR
• AV L 6
I ANTELOP • • wAY to J , '
."� 3 u z
' +
+ T u a _
• s �.-
J S QOUO" " wl1KT}IOR E A -
E AVE. ' to
� . E.ROSE - ST (D
AVE
too
MAGNOLIA AVE sw..r,�,
9 s � • ••
• � s
. 2
P •.
0
♦.. Z AVE ..
• CASE AVE. Z •
J • w V Cr _ ..
• �► .•.
•
• W'. c � SRN1D �►jC L tai. BRAND AVE ::, •
a: AVE.
t;
o
•
• E. 7th
10 �• E. 7th ST. ••
V
• �. e . te a• j •.•
4 0
tA
cc
••r AVE � .•r
to
••
• E• MWHEQ AHA .:.
LOCATION MAP
5
N
a
a
i v
Y
r
l
M }
R -3(H)
OW r1 ;
BC(M)=�
BC C
.;
hZ
•
Ivy Ave.
R-2
Rol S
Ra3
R -3(M)
L
aryland Ave.
Stillwater Rd.
6C(M)
Harvester Ave.
-C
m
ABC 9
Y
s 1p
—LBC
"Minnehaha Ave.
-ABC
� LBC
�.ps (H)
a`
BEAVER LAKE Q
LAND USE PLAN N
6
Attachment 3
R3
•
boundar
tr
' V
r 0 �' ► M , ewT ,... .:..
1 f
.• 01At.
' •� `._
i0
R 3
� �♦
i0 •� O use ♦ i •
C
r
�y
M Co v c''�
1 . I•s -� •
BEAVER LAIqE TRA ER PARK
1
N , •
0 13 ? i
1
. ...
. ;.1 R• .... r
Attachment 3
A lb 5 1 Bof T-
' • ' • : ••: i ' �' •: �: ::: : •: •: : •:: :• : :: • :• •
�E lA VIE :R . i , L' � K) E, •:. .•... .....•......•. • .•r.
tip ! / ,ate
,/ .� :. • .
it�22 !! !�)2!<) �i =�� 1 • Wit• •►i•i�.. • • w.
•_•. _
ID •Y/ 4•It •q l•
>rt
i
a • 1 i= :13 16 . 01l'
' k tau T Ir
•
1 , 1 i t0
t• • •f •
.,.%_.L_.L ... ..... ; ,. ............. . . ROSE AYE . �� ' :.�.: •
r . • . • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • ••• • :••� • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • , •� ty �• ,
X eX-
1 ............ .. .....:..... Y.
: i . feet
t . ............. ..........•. :� !.
1 ..,. ... ....•... . .... . .. :• .. ... ......... .. ' %'"
E . G AV E . r, ::�;� .�- :-•�: ` L743 • .: :��'''' :•' :�i;t `•• - 7M�� •":.......
� • GERANIUM
: .
. •�. • • . • • •. • • • y�. :• • • .•• • . . • • • •• 01 t •1 y //.• �••.
....ti ::......... •e►...:.:.. .. .... •::.•:.•:: :•:::::. h
• .. • •... • • . • • • •• • .... • . • . • • • .. •:•: •'�•{ • . • ..r. • • . • • ...
• .. • • • • • • • • • r • • • • .. • • • • • . • • . .. • • t : • ... • • . • • r • • . • • • • . • .
. • . • • • •
Ot•t 111116: . • .,.,.� ••.• � �::. :_ - _ '.j j�.ir��• • • • . ••.:•:• .'.. 1 �T •s. Ir .�, '�•, • .�.
J oe 6
= •.:: •:.• ....... a
. . .................
... ......................:......:. � P 1083 ��� :. .,�� .,ESS=
.....................� ........ • �,, 10$4 . - . ,
0 1 : :.':.•:. .: .: • :' •:•:• :•:•:•:•:•::
. .................. ... . .. . ..
• 1 . • • ..... • • • .... r • .. • • .�. • . • �� • ♦ �' .
O. .,..•.••.•...•..•♦ .. ••... ,..,.
••••• ,`• : :: : :: :• ,
`� .• ..•....• •
1 0 ••..•.. •• •.•• • s • . : : :•� :.:� 7. 1 •. 1•..
N -10 MAGN0Uj AI,N■AVE.ta _���■ � �i_LRok �IS Ss0AILM8!N!f#St
t ti�••.i •s j 1 �� :.J j `y�
10 » y __ U CIMOO L ,.� �. '' DIST. • 'i
N1 622
' �c
Isle
4 196 04) 0 :' 7 op
. . :•• ... • w1.• ,., •...• t •..c .••: 1 /. .• iy L i . j� 1 T.��.t0 1 1�e
tam
'
0 it •1 to Nb •f
ex
•► s «s r ., to � �1 " 1.IJ ' t� p`�i •ttt (I.tAI.)• / ,:
,•, rip)
i :t � � ' se � �' � � �.�•r�i'•• � it � ,� G - • �;::?�
tit. it — .1i!— ..w.
, r ,� .�
00
OAS
1 x X14 eo •, APAP _Ir _ • (•� - •. �) �.
do
•�
• 1 •' #me .
A" Sea Cal
•
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
0,6 0 0 0 0 " " 1980 QUAD -HOME SITE (30 AC[tES)
P ROPOSED SENIORS HOUSING Sfi'E
4
N
•
' V
i
A lb 5 1 Bof T-
' • ' • : ••: i ' �' •: �: ::: : •: •: : •:: :• : :: • :• •
�E lA VIE :R . i , L' � K) E, •:. .•... .....•......•. • .•r.
tip ! / ,ate
,/ .� :. • .
it�22 !! !�)2!<) �i =�� 1 • Wit• •►i•i�.. • • w.
•_•. _
ID •Y/ 4•It •q l•
>rt
i
a • 1 i= :13 16 . 01l'
' k tau T Ir
•
1 , 1 i t0
t• • •f •
.,.%_.L_.L ... ..... ; ,. ............. . . ROSE AYE . �� ' :.�.: •
r . • . • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r • • ••• • :••� • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • , •� ty �• ,
X eX-
1 ............ .. .....:..... Y.
: i . feet
t . ............. ..........•. :� !.
1 ..,. ... ....•... . .... . .. :• .. ... ......... .. ' %'"
E . G AV E . r, ::�;� .�- :-•�: ` L743 • .: :��'''' :•' :�i;t `•• - 7M�� •":.......
� • GERANIUM
: .
. •�. • • . • • •. • • • y�. :• • • .•• • . . • • • •• 01 t •1 y //.• �••.
....ti ::......... •e►...:.:.. .. .... •::.•:.•:: :•:::::. h
• .. • •... • • . • • • •• • .... • . • . • • • .. •:•: •'�•{ • . • ..r. • • . • • ...
• .. • • • • • • • • • r • • • • .. • • • • • . • • . .. • • t : • ... • • . • • r • • . • • • • . • .
. • . • • • •
Ot•t 111116: . • .,.,.� ••.• � �::. :_ - _ '.j j�.ir��• • • • . ••.:•:• .'.. 1 �T •s. Ir .�, '�•, • .�.
J oe 6
= •.:: •:.• ....... a
. . .................
... ......................:......:. � P 1083 ��� :. .,�� .,ESS=
.....................� ........ • �,, 10$4 . - . ,
0 1 : :.':.•:. .: .: • :' •:•:• :•:•:•:•:•::
. .................. ... . .. . ..
• 1 . • • ..... • • • .... r • .. • • .�. • . • �� • ♦ �' .
O. .,..•.••.•...•..•♦ .. ••... ,..,.
••••• ,`• : :: : :: :• ,
`� .• ..•....• •
1 0 ••..•.. •• •.•• • s • . : : :•� :.:� 7. 1 •. 1•..
N -10 MAGN0Uj AI,N■AVE.ta _���■ � �i_LRok �IS Ss0AILM8!N!f#St
t ti�••.i •s j 1 �� :.J j `y�
10 » y __ U CIMOO L ,.� �. '' DIST. • 'i
N1 622
' �c
Isle
4 196 04) 0 :' 7 op
. . :•• ... • w1.• ,., •...• t •..c .••: 1 /. .• iy L i . j� 1 T.��.t0 1 1�e
tam
'
0 it •1 to Nb •f
ex
•► s «s r ., to � �1 " 1.IJ ' t� p`�i •ttt (I.tAI.)• / ,:
,•, rip)
i :t � � ' se � �' � � �.�•r�i'•• � it � ,� G - • �;::?�
tit. it — .1i!— ..w.
, r ,� .�
00
OAS
1 x X14 eo •, APAP _Ir _ • (•� - •. �) �.
do
•�
• 1 •' #me .
A" Sea Cal
•
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
0,6 0 0 0 0 " " 1980 QUAD -HOME SITE (30 AC[tES)
P ROPOSED SENIORS HOUSING Sfi'E
4
N
MARY LAND AVEN_
ue
•
1 � 1 -
11 IJ
W ,� ® ,
WWI
lI I
PI
B R w Attachment 5
ELNESS ARCHITECTS INC
1
nl
.,
-�
k
III
JUN 21 1994
-• ��
June 25
,1994 � �
Tom Ekstrand
Community Development
City of Maplewood
RE: Zoning Variance
Dear Torn: .
On behalf of Rosewood Estate, we request a zoning code variance for
-
modification of the previously granted dwelling unit size variance for Rosewood
Estate of Maplewood.
We .request that the previously granted variance of 425 sq. 'ft. for efficiency units
and 525 sq. ft. for one bedroom units be modified to read 395 sq. ft. for efficiency
units and an average of 518 (470 -630 is actual range) sq. ft. for 1 bedroom units.
This modification in language in no way modifies the size or character of the
building previously reviewed-'and approved by the city council.
Rosewood Estate remains approximately 84,000 sq. ft. for 100 units. This equates
comparably in size to a multi - family building with conforming units. The unit
size variance is a result of more space being dedicated for common use in
Rosewood Estate to encourage and promote the interaction of senior residents.
This results in a building with approximately 43% of common space compared to
a typical multifamily building containing 20 to 2590 common space. (See
-
attached letter "of 11- 17 -93) :
As mentioned, this request in no way modifies ies the building previously approved
by the council. This variance necessary because we had previously supplied
-
average dwelling unit area calculations and were not aware that these numbers
were to be used as the minimum floor area requirements.
We therefore ask that you grant this request for modification to the minimum
unit size requirements.
Sincerely,
BRAT ELNESS ARCHITECTS, INC.
Thresher Square
700 Third Street So
Dirk Velett, AIA
Minneapolis,
MN 55415
612/339-5508
Fax 612/339-5382-
Attachment 6
I B ow
Thresher Square
700 Third Street So.
Minneapolis,
MN 55415
612/339-5508
Fax 612/339 -5382
BRw ELNESS ARCHITECTS INC
November 17, 1993
Tom Exstrana
Community Development
City of Maplewood
1830 East County B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Rosewood Estate
Maplewood, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Ekstrand:
i r ri111111r
V v r■ As 11 r
In response to your request, I would like to provide you the following
information to support having less square footage in the Rosewood units as a
trade off to more common area.
This assisted living project, as in the similar facilities in Roseville, Bloomington,
Edina, and Minnetonka, are designed exclusively for the frail elderly. Key to
their successes has been to offer residents small apartments that are very private,
of a manageable size. This reduced square footage is less than criteria established
for general occupancy but is offset by increasing proportionally the common areas
that are shared by all the residents. This' enlarged area is represented by parlors,
lounges, wide corridors, dinning room, activity rooms, etc., which encourage'
residents to spend more time out of their unit where there is assistance and social
activities. Generous and pleasant common areas support social interaction by the
residents and offer a pleasant experience in travelling to dining and programmed
activities within the building.
In a building of this type it is common to expect a60/40 split between private and
common areas as opposed to 80/20 in atypical apartment. In post occupancy
evaluations, it has been clear that the unit sue proposed in Maplewood is the
desired size.
I encourage you to take exception to the square foot criteria for this very special
building type. If you would like more information or specific data related to
these or other similar projects, please contact me.
Sincerely,
BR ELNE AR INC.
Elness, FAIA
Principal
Attachments (1)
10
Attachment 7
VARIANCE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, CARE Institute, Inc.-Maplewood applied for a variance from the zonin g ordinance..
WHE this variance applies to a five -acre tract at the southeast corner of Mary land
Avenue and Lakewood Drive. The legal description is:
That part of Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Beaver Lake Addition, Ram Cou . y �,
described as follows:
The south 375 of the north 408 feet of said Lots 7 and 8 which lies east of a line 49.5 feet
east of and parallel to the west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 25, Township 29, Range 22 and which lies west of a line 635.5 feet east of and
parallel to said west line.
WHEREAS, Section 36 -122 (b) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances ^y that the
. .
nnum habitable floor area for efficiency and one - bedroom apartment units is 580 square
feet.
WHEREAS,, the applicant is proposing that the efficiency units have 366 square feet and that
the one - bedroom units have 454 square feet.
WHEREAS this requires variances of 214 and 126 square feet
WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows:
1. On December 13, 1993, the City Council approved room -size variances for Rosewood
Estates to allow the efficiency units to have 425 square feet of area and the one - bedroom
units to have 525 square feet of area.
2. On June 28, 1994, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority reviewed an amendment
to this variance and recommended that the City Council allow the proposed smaller room
sizes..
3. On July 5, 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed an amendment to this variance and
recommended that the City Council allow the proposed smaller room sizes..
4. The City Council held a public hearing on , 19 - City staff published a
notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as
required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and
present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
from the City staff and Planning Commission.
11
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above- described
variance amendment for the followin g reasons:
1. There are common areas that compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior - housing facilities than in conventional
apartment buildings.
Adopted on , 19_.
12
Planning Commission
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
- 7 -
D. Approval of the resolution which approves a 205- square -foot floor area variance
for the studio units, a 115 square -foot floor area variance for the one- bedroom
units and a 130 -sq a -foot floor area variance for the two - bedroom units.
Approval is based o these findings;
1. Common areas cokpensate for the reduced knit size.
2. There are fewer peo a per unit in se ni housing facilities than in
conventional apartme t buildings.
3. Larger units can be mor ='en cult get around in for a resident with
physical or cognitive im
4. The City approved floor areXhariances for Rosewood Estates.
E. Approval of the resolution w ' a proves a variance to the Cites density
standard to use one person r unit or efficiency units. Approval is based on the
following reasons:
1. The applicant presZet r ed national statistics showing occupancy rates between
.9 and 1.0 person unit for assist living efficiency units.
2. The City does np't have a standard for �fflciency units in senior housing.
In addition, the City Ouncil should reconsider the�City ordinances regarding floor
area and density re q ements regarding senior and assisted living facilities, since
these facilities are Brent than conventional apartment buildings.
Commissioner Porson seconded
Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost,
Kittridge, Pearson
Nays- -Gerke
The motion passed.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Floor Area Variance: Rosewood Estates (Section 25)
Secretary Olson presented the staff report. Kirk Velett, BRW Elness Architects, spoke
representing Rosewood Estates. Mr. Velett explained that the building itself has not
been changed, but rather the size of the floor areas and the size of the variance. Tony
Schuster, of Rosewood Estates, also spoke.
Planning Commission
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
N1
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the
resolution which approves a 214 square -foot floor area variance for the efficiency
units and a 126- square -foot floor area variance for the one - bedroom units. Approval
is based on these findings:
1. There are common areas that compensate for the reduced unit size.
2. There are fewer people per unit in senior housing facilities than in conventional
. apartment buildings.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes-- Anitzberger, Fischer, Frost, Kittridge,
I Pearson
Nays -- Gerke, Axdahl
Commissioners Gerke and Axdahl voted nay, since they feel this is a City Council
policy decision.
The motion passed.
VIII. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
There were no visitor presentations.
IX. COMMISSION PRESENTATIONS
A. June 27 Cis,uncil Meeting:. Conunis,5a'oner Fischer reported
B. Representativh�for the July 11 Qouncil Meeting: Commissioner Kittridge
C. The Commission oted that ey have had a vacancy on the Planning Commission for
fourteen months. Co ' sion directed . staff to submit to the City Council a copy
of the Commission's 1 sand the results of the Conunssion's vote for
appointments to the Pl g Commission and request that the Council make the two
appointments.
X. STAFF PRESENTATIONS
Staff minded the C�nunissi
ff on of the\July 19 City tour.
XI. ADJOURNMENT /
Meeting adjourned at 9:08 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Maplewood City Council invites you to a public hearing. This hearin is about . P g g a
request to revise the floor -area variances granted for Rosewood Estates. The applicant is
CARE Institute, Inc. The location is the Southeast corner of Lakewood Drive and
Maryland Avenue. The request is for the following inimum floor a •
g areas: 395 square
feet for the efficiency units and 470 square feet for the one - bedroom units. The Council
. ncil
will hold this hearing on Monday, July 25, 1994 at 7:15 .m. or later in the City Hall
P ty
Council Chambers (1830 East County Road B).
Call Geoff Olson at 770 -4562 for more information.
Sign language interpreters are available. You must request this service at least 6 hours
q 9
in advance. Call 770 -4524 to make arrangements.
PUBLISH: July 13, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:
Bittersweet Estates
LOCATION:
Bittersweet Lane
DATE:
July 12, 1994
CONTENTS
Act ion by Counci
1
Endorsed---...
M odified� .,
ReJected,.,,___,��
Date
INTRODUCTION ......................... ............................... 2
Project Description .............. ............................... 2
Requests . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
BACKGROUND.......................... ............................... 2
DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . 0 a . ■ . . . . . . . ■ . . . ■ . . . ■ . . . . . ■ . . . ■ . ■ . . . ■ ■ . ■ . . . . ■ . . ■ . . . .
3
Land Use Plan Change ........... ...............................
3
Zoning Change ................. ...............................
3
Street Vacation— Flandrau Street to Bittersweet Lane ....................
3
Utilities.....................
...............................
4
Trail........................ ...............................
4
Street Vacation —East of Bittersweet Lane .............................
5
Preliminary Plat ......................................
Erosion.....................
...............................
5
Density
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ . . .. . ■ ■ .
5
Wetlands.................... ...............................
5
RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... ............................... 6
CITIZEN COMMENTS .................. ............................... 10
REFERENCE ............................ ............................... 12
SITE DESCRIPTION ............. ............................... 12
SURROUNDING LAND USES ...... ............................... 12
LEGAL....................... ............................... 12
TREES ....................... ............................... 12
SOILS ........................ ............................... 12
INTRODUCTION
Project Description
Mr. Bruce Mogren, representing Bittersweet Associates, is proposing to develop lots for
eight homes. The project's name is Bittersweet Estates. This plat would be on a 3.6-
acre site at the end of Bittersweet Lane. (See the location map on page 14.) The
developer would remove and regrade the south 100 feet of Bittersweet Lane.
Requests
Mr. Mogren is requesting that the City do the following:
1. Change the City's zoning map from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1
(single dwellings). (See the map on page 15.)
2. Vacate that part of Demont Avenue within the proposed plat. (See the map on page
16.)
3. Approve a preliminary plat for eight lots. (See the site plan on page 17.)
The City staff is proposing the following additional changes:
1. Change the City's land use plan map from R -1 (single dwellings) and OS (open
space) to R -1 (single dwellings). (See the maps on pages 18 and 19.)
2. Vacate Demont Avenue from Bittersweet Lane to the vacated Southlawn Drive,
BACKGROUND
On April 13, 1992, the City Council requested a road on the Demont Avenue right -of-
way between Bittersweet Lane and Flandrau Street.
On April 27, 1992, the Council decided not to build the street. The property owners to
the south (the current Bittersweet Estates Plat) objected because they were not sure
how they would develop their site.
On May 11, 1992, the Council did the following:
1. They vacated the north one -half of the Demont Avenue right -of -way that was
adjacent to 2527 Bittersweet Lane. They retained the east thirty feet of this right-
of -way for a future cul -de -sac bulb. This vacation was so the owners of 2527
Bittersweet Lane could add on to the south side of their house.
2
2. They approved a conditional use permit (CUP) to build a house on Outlot A of the
Seasons Park Addition. (See the site plan on page 21 and the minutes on pages
22 -24.)
On May 24, 1993, the Council approved a one-year time extension for the CUP
Y on
outlot A. The CUP has since expired because the owner did not build t he house within
the one year time extension.
DISCUSSION
Land Use Plan Change
The City's current land use plan shows open space connecting Four Seasons Park and
the wetlands to the east of the proposed plat. One resident proposed that the City
should buy the developer's site for open space. The Maplewood Open Space Committee
did not rate this site. The City is not planning to buy this site for park or open space.
The open space corridor on the land use plan crosses the proposed plat and 1694
Flandrau Street. 1694 Flandrau Street has a house on it. Since the City planned this
corridor, the Seasons Park plat has been developed. The only opportunity left to
connect Four Seasons Park and the wetlands to the east is a trail over the Flandrau
Street easement. Building this trail would meet the intent of the land use plan. (See the
trail discussion below) The City could drop the open space corridor since the land use
plan does not show neighborhood trails as open space corridors.
Zoning Change
The zoning change would reduce the potential traffic this site. With the current zoning,
a developer could build an office building, a clinic or a day care center. The proposed
plan is for eight single dwellings. A 12,000 square -foot office building would need 60
parking spaces and would produce at least 100 vehicle trips per day. The eight
proposed single dwellings would create about 80 vehicle trips per day. The City tries to
avoid putting commercial traffic through residential neighborhoods.
Street Vacation— Flandrau Street to Bittersweet Lane
State law states that a city cannot vacate a street unless it is in the public interest.
Demont Avenue is not paved. The developer does not need to use Demont Avenue for a
street since the lots would front on an extension of Bittersweet Lane. There is no public
interest in building a street on this easement. There is public interest in the existing
utilities and a future trail.
3
Utilities
There is a water line and a sanitary ewer line in the •
rY easement. The water line is
between Bittersweet Lane and Flandrau Street. The '
sanitary sewer runs about 154 feet
from Flandrau Street. As part of this ro•ect the developer -
p � eloper will install an eight -inch
water main between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1. This would replace p the existing water main
in Demont Avenue that is on the north side of Lots 1 -3 Block san sewer
. 1. The sani
would remain. The sanitary sewer for the new lots howe would be in the new
Bittersweet Lane.
Trail
The City has discussed the issue of a trail between Bittersweet Lane and Flandrau Street
before. The purpose of a trail would be to provide safer pedestrian access to Four
Seasons Park for the residents on Southlawn Drive, Edgehill Road and Bittersweet Lane.
The only way these residents have to get to the park is on County Road C. As traffic
increases, the need for this trail will grow.
The staff surveyed the residents between Bittersweet Lane, Southlawn Drive, County
Road C and Edgehill Road. Thirty -six surveys were returned. The residents of 28 homes
were in favor of a trail, seven were opposed and one had no opinion. Those who
commented were mainly concerned about the safety hazard of having to walk on
County Road C to the park. Several residents commented that they do not use the park
because there is no safe way to get there.
Since .there is public interest in a trail to the park, the City should not vacate this
easement without retaining a trail easement. Vacating the street without retaining a
trail .easement would not meet the finding of no public interest required by State law.
The City should retain a trail easement, even if they decide not to pave the trail.
The developer should pave a trail from Flandrau Street on the Demont Avenue
easement to the common property line between proposed Lots 3 and 4 to the end of the
Bittersweet Lane extension. The trail should be twelve foot wide from Flandrau Street
to the manhole. This would be wide enough for City maintenance crews to get to the
sanitary sewer manhole that is east of Flandrau Street. The trail can be eight feet wide
from the manhole to Bittersweet Lane. The developer should build a fence on either
side of the trail within his plat. If the adjacent neighbors request it, the developer
should build a fence on either side of the trail outside this plat. There is a short
driveway on the Flandrau Street /Demont Avenue right -of -way. The adjacent owners to
the north (2522 Flandrau Street the Zappas) use this driveway to park their truck. The
developer could pave the trail around this drive. The City should reimburse the
developer for the cost of the trail that is outside the boundaries of the developer's plat.
4
Another advantage of a paved trail within the plat is that it would provide access to
maintain the water main. without a trail, adjacent owners will probably start planting
gardens and maintain lawns and fences over the water main. In case of a water main
problem, the City would have to rip up this landscaping.
Regardless of the Council's decision on paving the trail, they should direct the Public
g
p �
Works Department to remove the "No Trespassing" " si s at each end of Flandrau
Street. The City Attorney advised me that the City cannot prohibit the public from using
a public easement.
Street Vacation --East of Bittersweet Lane
The Council should vacate the part of Demont Avenue that is east of Bittersweet Lane.
There is a drainage swale and wetland in this part of the right -of -way. The only public
interest in this easement is for a drainage pipe that the developer will build. The City
ty
should retain a drainage easement over the south ten feet of the north 30 feet. The Ci
has no plans to build a street on Demont Avenue.
Preliminary Plat
Erosion
The neighbor at 2526 Bittersweet Lane complained about the erosion between their
property and the plat. The developer will fill in the existing drainage ditch and .replace
it with a storm sewer pipe.
Density
Several neighbors thought that there were too many lots in this plat. The proposed lot
sizes range from 10,100 square feet to 25 ,451 square feet with an average lot size of
16,252 square feet. The average lot size is larger than many of the lots on Bittersweet
Lane and Flandrau Street. These range in size from 11,850- 13,950 square feet. The
City Code requires at least 10,000 square feet above a drainage easement and 75 feet of
width. All of the proposed lots meet or exceed City standards. The City cannot reduce
the number of lots if the developer is meeting the City's ordinances.
wetlands
A resident was concerned about the loss of the two wetlands on the site. The two
wetlands are at the southeast and southwest corners of the site. The developer will
preserve these wetlands. The City should require wetland buffer easements to protect
the wetlands.
5
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Adopt the resolution on page 27. This resolution changes the land use plan from
R -1 (single dwellings) and OS (open space) to R -1 (single dwellings). This change
is because:
1. The proposed open space corridor is developed or proposed to be developed
with single dwellings.
2. A trail on Flandrau Street would preserve the intent of the open space corridor
by providing for pedestrian access between Bittersweet Lane and Four Seasons
Park,
B. Adopt the resolution page 28. This resolution changes the zoning of the Bittersweet
Estates plat from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 (single dwellings). The
reasons for this zone change are the findings required by ordinance and because
the R -1 zone would be more compatible with the Bittersweet Lane neighborhood.
C. Adopt the resolution on page 30. This resolution vacates the Demont Avenue right -
of -way between Bittersweet Lane and Flandrau Street, except the west 98.95 feet.
The west 98.95 feet shall be limited to public utilities and a public trail. The City
should vacate this street easement because:
10 It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this easement.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
4. The City cannot vacate the remaining easement because there is public interest
in a trail.
This vacation is subject to the developer recording this resolution with the final
plat. The City shall not release this resolution until the City approves the final plat.
D. Direct the Public Works Department to remove the "No Trespassing" signs at
either end of Demont Avenue between Flandrau Street and Bittersweet Lane.
E. Adopt the resolution on page 31. This resolution vacates the Demont Avenue right -
of -way between Bittersweet Lane and the vacated Southlawn Avenue right -of -way.
The City should vacate this street right -of -way because:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this easement.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
This vacation is subject to the following conditions:
1. Retaining a drainage easement over the south ten feet of the north 30 feet of
the west 169 feet of the above - described right -of -way.
2. The City shall not record this resolution until the developer has completed the
grading on the right -of -way.
F. Approve the Bittersweet Estates preliminary plat (received by the City on April 22,
1994). Before the City Council approves a final plat, a developer shall complete the
following conditions:
1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or
contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public
improvements and meet all City requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Pay the City for the cost of traffic - control and street identification signs.
d. Construct an eight - foot -wide paved walkway and fencing between Lots 3
and 4 of Block 1 from the cul -de -sac to the existing sanitary sewer
manhole on Lot 4, Block 1. Also construct a 12- foot -wide paved walkway
from the existing sanitary sewer manhole on Lot 4, Block 1 to Flandrau
Street near the north property line. If requested by the adjacent property
P rty
owners, the developer shall provide a fence on one or both sides. The
developer shall install posts at each end of the trail to prevent cars or
trucks from using the trail. The developer shall build the entire trail and
any required fencing with the street. The City Engineer must approve
these plans. The City will reimburse the developer for the cost of the trail
and any fencing that is beyond the lat boundaries. The City is requiring
p ty q g
.that the developer pay for the part of the trail within the plat since the
trail will provide park access to the residents of the new p lat.
e.* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer.
f. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements.
These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there
shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or dumping.
g. Install survey monuments along any wetland boundary.
h. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands.
i. The developer shall use the Cottages property to haul in fil material. The
developer may use Bittersweet Laqne form normal development
construction traffic.
2.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans.
These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control tree trail
and street plans. The building official must approve the retaining wall if it will
be over four feet tall. The plans -shall meet the followin g conditions:
a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook.
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for
each home site.
(2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction
will disturb.
(3) Illustrate housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the
developer can save large trees.
(4) The tree plan shall show:
(a) Where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees
(b) The size and species of any trees that the developer will plant as
replacement trees
3. Show the following on the final plat:
a. Atwenty- foot -wide utility and trail easement between Lots 3 and 4 of
Block 1, and along the north property line of Lot 4, Block 1.
b. The existing storm water drainage easement on the east side of the site.
C. A drainage easement on the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, subject to
J
the City Engineer's approval. This easement shall be for the proposed
storm sewer.
d. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final
plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear
property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines.
8
4. -Show the wetland boundaries on the final tat as a ro
p pp ved by the Watershed
District.
5.* Give the City wetland easements over the two wetlands. These easements shall
cover the wetlands and any land within twenty eet surrounding ty ding a wetland.
The easement shall prohibit an building '
Y g or structures vv�thm twenty feet of
the wetland or any mowing, cutting, dumping '
g� g or p g within ten feet of the
wetland or within the wetland itself. The u ose of this '
p �`p easement is to protect
the water quality of the wetlands from homeowners' fertilizer
and to protect
the wetland habitat from residential encroachment.
es o final plat art of the preliminary If the developer decides t '
p p p nary plat, the City may
waive any conditions that do not apply to the final p lat,
*The developer must complete these conditions before th '
e City issues a grading
permit or approves the final plat.
E
CITIZEN COMMENTS
We asked the nearby property owners for their opinion of these requests. We sent
surveys to the property owners within 350 feet of the site. Out of 33 properties, we
received fifteen replies. Seven were for the requests and eight were against.
Those for the requests had the following comments:
1. It is the best use of the land. It compliments the surrounding neighborhood. Please
inform us as to how long Demont Avenue is west of Bittersweet that is to be
vacated. I believe it has already been vacated. The remainder is an easement
vacation. I hope the westerly portion of the easement is returned to Mrs. Kay
Oswald. (Joe and Kathy Zappa - 2522 Flandrau Street)
2. A good use of land. (Tembreull - 2540 Flandrau Street)
3. We would rather have single family homes than commercial businesses.
(Glendenning - 2497 Flandrau Street)
4. In favor of residential designation but disappointed in that past plans have always
left our street a dead end. Would be in favor of cul -de -sac with four homes and an
alternate entry for four other homes. How about a walking path for the street
vacation? (Downing - 2542 Bittersweet Lane)
Those amt the requests had the following comments:
mments.
1. There are too many houses planned for the proposed extended cul -de -sac. The
houses will be too crowded without backyards. We are also concerned about the
natural drainage between our property and the proposed plat next to our residence.
Years of run -off have eroded the banks off our property and the adjoining plat.
(Ronholm - 2526 Bittersweet Lane)
2. Reduce the number of lots to five and build a blacktop path to the park. (Jackson -
2535 Bittersweet Lane)
3. You are cramming too many houses in a small area -plus they said they would not
put our street. thru -well that's not what this says -yes I'm against it!! (Wilson -
2541 Bittersweet Lane)
4. Infringes on privacy we have enjoyed for many years. Connect the street to the
Carefree Cottages site. (Skoog - 2546 Bittersweet Lane)
5. I do not want Bittersweet open to heavier traffic. (Jackson - 2547 Bittersweet
Lane)
10
6. There are too many home sites being and proposed —five sites are more than
enough. Remove three lots along the north property line. (Larson - 2554
Bittersweet Lane)
7. We would prefer $100,000 plus homes be built. Our home has already been
devalued with the Mogren retirement community. (Kennedy - 2503 Flandrau)
S. See the letter on page 25.
11
REFERENCE
SITE DESCRIPTION
Gross Area: 3.6 acres
Net Area: 2.98 acres
Proposed Density: 2.68 homes per net acre
Existing land use: Rough graded and undeveloped
Property Owner: David and George Wessin
SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Houses on Flandrau Street and Bittersweet Lane
East: County Open Space
South:. Carefree Cottages of Maplewood
West: single dwellings
LEGAL
In regard to street vacations, Chapter 412.851 of Minnesota State law states that "No
such vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so ...
TREES
Five large oak trees and at least ten large poplar trees are on the site. A variety of
species and sizes of trees cover most of Lot 4, Block 1. Many of these trees are
cottonwoods and poplars. The Cit y's tree Ordinance does not re uire that the developer
t Y q p
replace trees under eight inches in diameter or box elder, cottonwoods or poplar trees.
The developer will have to replace any of the oak trees that he removes. The developer
. p
plans to grade most of this site. The plans do not clearly show if he can save the oak
trees on the east end of the site to do this adin
� . ' g
SOILS
The Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District informed us that the soils on this site
are suitable for development if the developer controls the erosion. The District
recommends that the developer get specific soils data before developing the site,
p g
12
go:b- 7:bittermem (10)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Property Line Map (Street Vacation)
4. Site Plan
5. Land Use Plan Map (Existing)
6. Land Use Plan Map (Proposed)
7. Narrative Statement
8. 1992 Kavanaugh CUP Site Plan
9. 5 -11 -92 Council minutes
10. 5-2-94 letter from Fosses
11. Land Use Plan Change Resolution
12. Zoning Map Change Resolution
13. Street Vacation Resolution (west of Bittersweet Lane)
14. Street Vacation Resolution (east of Bittersweet Lane)
15. Project Plans (separate attachment)
13
Attachment 1
O
1. $UAAMR CT.
2. COUNTR^MEW qR. � �?
3. DULUTH CT. •�, x
4. LYDIA sr. ms 's
BEAM �
0
0 �
v d wr+
KOMlA1M! AVE
AD
t;
lk
a � M
W
'lir telomoKs AVE. �BROO
AVE.
S0( UNT z �► s. w
Z �"� 0
BEAM
MAPLE
W
N
� 0 Z
Y
U
RADATZ � �
ae % oe
p MESSAeI AV :• � ' j • ..::. .
RI1A15EY
COUNTY
� COURT
KOHLWW
AVE.
s'
EDG LL R0. '•
alai
5C
CL
EL
AVE. S GEFNAtS v GERVIUS GERi/AIS AVE. � U�
U GRMIOVl�I AVE. Z CT.
ViKiNC OR. � CASTLE �,VE• .•
ct
SHERREN AVE. x ���
a Adak
CASTLE AVE.
0
� COPE L--� � � AVE COPE AVE.
AVE ,�'
1
� � E. Gi U1RK AV
� E t;
X v t lAUR1E R0. �� .,r LAURIE Rp � � BRIE ..,� RD.
Woo
y� = M
SAND URST � AvE
� W CO. R0. > B � � •
'SCE A � BURKE �vE. o � � LBURKE I►VE O ��G�
� V
h, LA. � EIDR IDGE AVE. 3 .iw a�.�. . •• ;''
BEIMONT AVE.
AV E � •I170Y�� ab "a '.
SKILL . MAN AVE. N.VtRtS AVE i� `•...
ROSEWOOO AVE. t4-
LOCATION MAP
14
Q
N
Attachment 2
a
i
v
s 32,) 7
ISO O tt)
of
: r .75
t
9 . .7 see.
(Is) 00)
2489 '
�.
'-- _-- —
(om) A.
2481
(
: !6 = ss•
S.10 Ac.
cam, �-
�-
,. 2480
tv �
�•
loo o'
1
-
2473 �
W
W
cc
�32� -n
CAREFREE COTTAGES
•
35) .�
.,7S ac. +ss• 10 4 %
Z)
R '
Io
2468
�Sp•
"'
�/ .
0
7v
O
tj
c
• �
ws
?.�•' •� .
Z
•
.7s s c.
v,
J
uw
f '
37) 2555= = 25540s1 S _,,__�
.
(46) % 4
i
A.
2548 - - 2547 , 254fi 3
Q --
0
12L t
(67)
(4 264) o �5�.3. . .
47 u . .37 ae.) t�._ „ 254,2 �•�
2540 (44) 2541= r ' ' ��'
_
� •1•
is
253
���• c•r-r� �s . 0J.
; � . 8
( co g
.7s (0) 2535► e 3-� •,
2534
'
2 0 �se.ir
532 0' c�
14
.
2525 °
�
41) = ti�j ''�
25250 '.
4 oo
5rovA
-
.�saC. N. 7 4 A ;jr i
080 It "
2522 ' °` 2526 we 33
•— ,.
3 6 6.67 .
V+ Y
�o
w
t
1 3 9 i .
C
i (64.45
0
M APLC WO
00
1
16 4
9 4
0 9 F
M W
.. 2 3 b
C E
a PARK
g
w+
h b 1 3
. ,
....
t 32 , T E
RI
2 503 4
_ 2 504 , a
6 0
X 7. ........
2497,E
olo
o+
-t33� 249fi
`
(Is) 00)
2489 '
�.
'-- _-- —
(om) A.
2481
88
- ^ 219)
''`'
S.10 Ac.
cam, �-
�-
,. 2480
tv �
�•
0
a P
ARK
1
-
2473 �
W
W
cc
�32� -n
CAREFREE COTTAGES
h 2472
4
2468
.
�, 246
�/ .
0
7v
O
tj
c
• �
ws
?.�•' •� .
Z
•
v,
J
uw
f '
.
M
. o
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
Q
� 5
SITE N
Attachment 3
.75 • &
(G3) io 1 7
ISO (7)
70*) .(3 •
.75 3) : 11 •0
.(40
Its. 9•
100
• •- - ' . •. 1,0 (46) ��
.15 (*ma• ; I *I boo %I,- %No %M I Ir %MMO
fro
4 p . N
cj!��
(40' (f 5)
. 111 (Gr (f 5)
4M —, q
12
of s 10 vo O� Coi
sit) If 6 % . 9
mwmwns� .-
75ma Cl. mlmnmwmn� ff • W.
• . '! I . . (46). 000000
(.3j) F , • 3
.2
0
C•37 (.57
(r)A
1-1 0
.(4+) Q7
fTsO (13) :+
ac. 4� y ��� is M
oil
Plo
(G 8)
J
DEVEL
PROPOSED STREET V'AC
Q
ATION (41)
fe ITIA .�` .... . . .. . ..
1� A 9. - , . . ;*.* ...
0 . (909101 ISO. IV 150-01
ii p
r. S • O&M $a
3 s
CITY
- Av
"LtW000 PROPOSED STREET
PROPOSED'.
VACATION
PROPOSED PLAT
• O •;' 010
PARK
w
If
CL
POND
10
ko
W (1)
A.
W
Xs.
OV s
dolt
I.So CARL= FRE COTTAGES
• LL •
z o o � .: '• • Cz� • ��
C
�4C J�- � , o A so _
r
Ci
t o 6.
04
PROPERTY LINE MAP
P ROPOSED STREET VACATIONS
STREET VACATED MAY 119, 1992
16
4
Attachment 4
C R S T tit 0 0 R 1
i sass
i
i f T t e
PROPQSED ST PROP STREET
REET VACATION _ ss �, ; PROPOSED
�.� � � ,• VACATION
0
,. o�Y , ` ~. " >>N•j=•� yr / M � • �•;�'�. :.f ..�.: � ..�,...'.. :....,,,........, -,.: _
� , � N I i�t .fit • . .. ••Y7r. >> •• /` 1ii • �•• • . •..• •..:::.•.•'• :::: :
� a+iT.ir'`r;► .y :yam• . :' �. :• • ' ••.•�d� :�;:. ;�•:+ t
V .
PROP
SEASONS P RK ADMON
TO MAPLEWOOD
! / •+ i ce'
15 1 1 4
i WETLAND -!'-'
13 _
•
Plan For:
BITTERSWEET ASSOCIATES
c/o David Hesley
2607 White Bear Avenue
Maplewood. MN 55109
Tele: 770 -8505
Plan By-
BRUCE A. FOL Z & ASSOC.
1815 Northwestern Mos.
Stillwater. MN 55082
Tom'•' 4 39 -8833
! I
s4•�i fltwn ?•�f •fir � �
1.'0001. r•t ..• ••��r• t�s. !•.s/ �I�tO .��t� ta/
�» .r...� �t+M Ai t f � •s .w�/ /•rte I t . fit • /�/ �
aGl.: 8 t •.. art 16 w•
•
.: WETLAND : i' *�►r�.'.•�.
c • ♦ • • 0'. a •. •. i
0 000 ate
• �• •11 0� •
• •
•� �� �. .
g ; •!. .• .•
ix..t • .• . °• v • • .' • • p
•. .•0.••. o•
• • b t u, 0 :••
( Nw.jrr• a [.s s
I�vN�s jji:it • f••2�2 SI'! ! C. w. M •I �. ••t 'O ri.1�/. R2
^•,.,•J L•i I<oy* b s4034 , A•s:1. 44 ;0t
Gb•s 1 044 S.40 kovs:
Mar A"A • 2.!1 •s4r.s2 "
0--w arA" camp. I.. � •� v
•w=%� 1 Mw� Ibte
•n•P++.• w +w ... •.Mws!
a
s +�
SITE PLAN
17 N
Preliminary Plot and Utilit • y P lan :
BITTERSWEET ESTATES
o. x4f404d:
April 6. 1994
Attachment 5
ONE
ttt�
■ ■ ■ ■ W ■ ■ R V lot. a Pi E IM ac. O i
r � � O J O E{ � ` ^✓
■ CO
. E , f
_. Av
RA -
CA
E3C BC(M) R-2
(BC
, C
M 1 R 3(M)
Cz
.1 '1,i m '�
- --- - i - / _-3 M ? (M)
�oofi
I.
~t„I ( r « i i 3C� i
•+. _ _l Ito J i C n rl I COsf/
I. ' Last
-
ry
I r j Or C C O 1@ C t�C}a<- �� ; ;l. t r,,
f �
s �t �■ �■ ■ �Ir■t at s ■mot
l
`W i -
., 1 ..
Wool Os
O
I
t ++
BC Oro �tl 0
p �B
f All
_ R; C
R-
lect or - i Vag It — _ 1 �'O
i
an WE o■■ ss Est ■roc aril s :...' M -�-
_ 'LBC
' • " «...._ - a « « ___ Mme Y. 6 L ug i II i1 ! I I
jj 13
r _ I I
I �
r t e ,a I Highway 36
n e r ha g
�""� rte► i `� v .. .. ...+y •� . , � r
_
Q3
C
L
V
>
W
O
O
Q
C--
•-
O
tb
V
O
[n
O
._.
m
$"
LAND USE PLAN MAP
(EXISTING)
Q
N
r,186
Attachment 6
M -1 ■ _
l 1
mayor collector , _ ■ /
BC
,
I v MA" .�
■
,■
BC
• ,- E,.
- .....__ .
g enm
_ _ r - 1 al
:
it �o r Bgm L BC(M) R +21 ! BG R•1
At
I;
�. 6 C
M -1 _ R -3 -�'
I � I - f l ._........
q e 06 .
h i
-♦ t -3(M
R 3CH1_
'. Lh � l7ef� r_ ., C u '" Cory
Ulf
L
c o 1 t e cTdr — . W - - -- - 11 J r
'� 1 ` 1. ; 1► `� - � _ i ■
r - -
os
M .
-- Ij BC _. - R -3 .
P _ i, - _ LB - - i
11 ,+ i , H)
C 0
f �— P �1
o -
. .� _ =��
�aior collector N C• .,
I ■R ■�■ �■ �■ ■s sls�t �Iri■t�t ■ '
M 1 ,
- ,,; •t1
m a d r te i a l H i h w a
9 y 3e ? r ha e
r
O ct�
V N
two to
•O m
• Ri
� t
LAND USE PLAN MAP
(STAFF PROPOSAL)
19
Q
N
Attachment 7
BRUCE A. FOLZ & ASSOCIATES
LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING
1815 NORTHWESTERN AVE. • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 • 612 43 -
( ) 9 8833
BITTERSWEET ESTATES Comprehensive Plan
and Rezoning Narrative Statement
This property is presently zoned LBC and is proposed to be rezoned R -1. The
present land use to the north, west and southwest is single family residential.
The present land use to the south is residential multifamily developed as the
Cottages under a P.U.D.
The proposed rezoning would be compatible with the neighborhood and
complete the development of this area in a residential setting. The extension of
Bittersweet Lane would add 9 single family lots and not create any traffic
problems. The new street would, have a proper cul -de -sac for turn- around
purposes and remove the present cul -de -sac with is substandard. The wetlands
to the east of this property will provide an open space and natural environment.
This proposed subdivision is compatible with the existing neighborhood and would
preserve or enhance present property values in the area.
The property is presently served with a street access to Bittersweet Lane.
Sanitary sewer and watermain serve this property and can easily be extended to
serve the proposed subdivision. The addition of 9 single family lots will not
have a significant impact on the schools or park facilities.
We believe single family residential use of this property is the most
compatible land use for this residential area.
20
Attachment 8
• OUTLOT "A" SEASONS PARK ADDITION TO MAP
LEWOOD
O
Z N. line orr'ne Se. i14 oriXe t�e t1 4
1
U.
E.r. Ro99rs• Gorden L * 33v.58
�' a ....
s
.•.,•��,••' IC4.9S _ i i i 9S
• v -
R
14
�; w o
10 j� —. of l Inch - 60 Feet
1 a 0 'y - 0
o0)
W Cu
u) .tD
p
m
A
r•
a
r
o
W
J
r
(1992 KAVANAGH CUP SITE PLAN)
21
4
N
Attachment 9
5 -11 -92 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
I. Conditional Use Permit: Demont Ave. h Kavana 1
C 9)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Community Development Olson resented thespecifics
P of the
report,
C. Councilmember Juker moved to ap2rov the Conditional Use P e r m� t for
r
variance.
.._.�.,,
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach
Councilmember Rossbach withdrew his second.
Motion died for lack of a second.
d. Councilmember Zappa moved to refer the 33 ft, easement back to the
Planning Commission with the stipulation that We
p s s i n allow access to Lot
A.
Councilmember Zappa withdrew his motion.
e. Councilmember Carlson introduced the followin Resolution and moved - Q its
adoption with the condition of a deed restriction 1 i mi t i n g the number
dwell n g s t 1'
of
92 -05 -48
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(Bittersweet Lane Drive)
WHEREAS, John Kavanagh applied for a conditional use ermit
p ermit w P ,. This
p o • wou ld allow him m to build 1 d a house on an outl of that i s not adjacent
a maintained t to
public street.
WHEREAS, this permit applies to Outlot A of the Seasons P '
Park Addition.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use
perms t is as foll
1. The Planning Commi ssion discussed this ap Septem
PP on • permit
3,
1991. They recommended that the City Council approve this
with a driveway to Flandrau Street, PP P �t
2. The City Council held a public hearing on September 23 1991.
P Ci t y
s S _
st aff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council ave
everyone. at the hearing a g
g chance to speak and present written
statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations
of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ci t Counci 1 approve th Y pp a above -
de bed conditional use permit for the following reasons
22
5 -11 -92 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
1. The use would be located, designed, maintained
. 9 � constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the
surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activit process, materials,
y, P
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental disturbing r cause a nuisance to an p erson
9 y p son
or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor,
fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration
general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on
existing or proposed streets.
6. The u.se would be served b adeq publ c faci l '
'
• Y q p �tie.s and services,
includi streets, police and fire protecti drainage structures
'
water
and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for P ublic
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design,
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects.
This permit is subject to the property owner completing the fol 1 owi n
conditions:
g
1. Constructing a paved driveway over Demont Avenue to Bittersweet
Lane. This driveway shall be at least twelve feet wide.
2. Signing an agreement with the City. This agreement shall state that
the owner shall maintain this driveway and hold the Cit harmless
for an cla y
y ms or liability abi 1 i ty for the use of the driveway, This
agreement shall also allow adjacent property owners to use this
driveway, if the City approves of this use. The City ntends
y to
require a maintenance age- eement as a condition of any such approval.
3. Obtaining the approval of the City Engineer for the location and
design of t h i s driveway. The Engineer shall allow on
the north s enough room g
side of the right -of -way for a future eight- foot -wide
trail.
4. The property owner shall have a deed restriction filed a ai nst t h i s
lot that g
prohibits more than one house.
23
5 -11 -92 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — CITY OF ,... }'
. MAP � EWQOD�t
..` : r nrJ,{�5• 1, y, ;
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes Mayor Bastian, Counci 1 members
Carlson. Rossbach 5 °'
Nays — Councilmember Juker-
Ab stain - Councilmember Zap a `
P
24
Attachment 10
BITTERSWEET 94
May 2, 1994 i
Mr. Kenneth Roberts
Associate Planner
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, Minnesota 55109
RE: NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY, BITTERSWEET ESTATES
Dear. Mr. Roberts:
Pursuant of your request we would like to comment on the Proposed
development of the Bittersweet Estates.'
First of all we would like to say that our recent move to Maplewood from
St. Paul, (within 2 years) was based upon the comments of friends and
associates that have lived in the area for years. We have been pleased
with the "small town" atmosphere of Maplewood and of the neighborhood in
which we reside.
we live in the Seasons Park development, 2481 Flandrau St., Lot 18 as
dipicted on your Property line Map.
Although our choice of lot abutts us on a City park, we are concerned
with the recent Developments on the adjacent properties across the
street from our residence. Unfortunately our time of arrival in the
area did not invite our comments on the Carefree Cottages development.
We do however have a few comments in regard to the recently Proposed
Bittersweet Estates.
1. We do realize that Mr. Mogren and the Mogren family are in the
Development business, and their property is worth profits as it is
proposed to develop. It seems as if Mr. Mogren sat on the property
until his children were old enough to partake in business ventures
such as this. This can be noted all around the City. Just because its
there doesnt mean it needs to be developed.
2. It is unfr�rtunate that althought this property would generate
addition taxes for the City, additional housing and jobs, lots such
as this could not be purchased by the City for openspace.
The Mogren development of Carefree cottages has already consumed a
vast quantity of open space, leaving no areas for wildlife and its
habitat.
3. According to your site plan, unfortunately we cannot read the
elevations, it appears the South lots will require massive retaining
and fill to bring the lots up to a buildable condition..
4. Additionally according to your site plan, the Southwest lot 4 and
25
BITTERSWEET 94
SouthEast lots 1 & 2 appear to be encrotching on additional
wetlands. How much wetlands will the City give up?
5. Lastly, if the City allows development of this property, please
require that the owners build maintainence free, quality buildings in
keeping with the area. I own my own construction business, low
bidders mean low quality.
In closing we would like to say we are not in favor of the proposal yet
we are not a proponent.
Please keep us informed.
Thank you for the opportunity.
Scott & Carol Foss
2481 Flandrau Street
Maplewood
T79 -6764
486 -0339
26
Attachment 11
LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development proposed a change to the City's
land use plan. This change is from R -1 (single. dwellings) and OS (open space) to R -1
(single dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property south of Demont Avenue
and north of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood in Section 10, Township 29, Range
22.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:.
1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 5, 1994. The City staff
published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the
hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning
Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment.
2. The City Council discussed the plan amendment on , 1994. They
considered reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission and City
staff.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described change for the following reasons:
1. The proposed open space corridor is developed or proposed to be developed with
single dwellings.
2. A trail on Flandrau Street would preserve the intent of the open space corridor by
providing for pedestrian access between Bittersweet Lane and Four Seasons Park.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 19940
27
Attachment 12
RESOLUTION: ZONING MAP CHANGE
WHEREAS, Bruce Mogren, representing Bittersweet Associates, applied for a change
in the zoning map from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 (single dwellings).
WHEREAS, this change applies to the undeveloped property south of Demont Avenue
and north of the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood at the south end of Bittersweet Lane.
The legal description is:
That part of Lots 1 and 2, E.G. Roger's Garden Lots, according to the plat on file in
the office of the County Recorder Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest comer of said Lot 2; thence south 89 degrees, 59
minutes, 00 seconds east, assumed bearing along the north line of said Lot 2 and Lot 1
a distance of 494.77 feet; thence South 00 degrees 43 minutes 47 seconds east 150.00
feet; thence south 49 degrees 30 minutes 02 seconds west 214.78 feet to the north line
of the south 989.64 feet of said Lots 1 and 2; thence North 89 degrees 53 minutes 49
seconds west along said north .line 330.21 feet to the west line of said Lot 2; thence
North 00 degrees 37 minutes 31 seconds west along said west line 289.04 feet to the
point of beginning, containing 3.02 acres, more or less.
WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows:
1. On July S. 1994,. the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the change.
2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1994. City staff published
a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property
owners as required by law. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an
opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered
reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described change in the zoning map for the following reasons:
1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the
zoning code.
2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of
neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the
use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan
is adequately safeguarded.
28
3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the
community, where applicable, and the public welfare.
4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient,
and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water
sewers, police and fire protection and schools.
S. The R -1 zone would be more compatible with the Bittersweet Lane
neighborhood.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 19940
29
Attachment 13
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Bruce Mogren, representing Bittersweet Associates, applied for the
vacation of the following described street:
That part of the Demont Avenue right -of -way between the west fight-of-way f
y
Bittersweet Lane and an extension of the east right -of -way line of Flandrau Street,
except west 98.95 feet. The west 98.95 feet shall be limited to public trail and public
., p P
utility use.
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. The Planning Conunission recommended that the City Council approve this
Vacation on July 5, 19940
2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1994. City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the
abutting properly owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission,
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will
go to the following abutting properties:
Lot 16, Block 4 of the Crestmoor Addition; Lot 1, Block 2 and Outlot A of the Seasons
Park Addition; and Lot 2 of E.G. Roger's Garden Lots.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described vacation for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this easement.
3. The adjacent properties have .street access.
40 The City cannot vacate_ the remaining easement because there is public interest in a
trail.
This vacation is subject to the developer recording this resolution with the final plat.
The City shall not release this resolution until the City approves the final plat.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on .19940
30
Attachment .14
VACATION RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development proposed that the City Council
vacate the following described street:
That part of the Demont Avenue right -of -way between the east right -of -way line of
Bittersweet Lane and the centerline of the vacated Southlawn Avenue..
WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows:
1. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve this
vacation on July 5, 19940
2. The City Council held a public hearing on , 1994. City
staff published a notice in the Maplewood. Review and sent a notice to the
abutting property owner. The Council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to
speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations from the City staff and Planning Conunission.
WHEREAS, after the City approves this vacation, public interest in the property will
go to the following abutting properties:
Lots 6 and 7, Block 5 of the Crestmoor Addition and Lot 1 of E.G. Roger's Garden Lots.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above-
described vacation for the following reasons:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this easement.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
This vacation is subject to the following conditions:
1. Retaining a drainage easement over the south ten feet of the north 30 feet of the
west 169 feet of the above - described right -of -way.
2. The City shall not record this resolution until the developer has completed the
grading on the right -of -way.
The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on , 1994.
31
MINUTES OF THE MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION
1830 EAST COUNTY ROAD B. MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA
JULY 5, 1994
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Commissioner Rohr Anitzberger Present
Commissioner Leste Axdahl
Present
Commissioner Lorr ' Fischer
Present
Commissioner Jack Fr t
Present
Commissioner Gary Ger
Present
Commissioner Kevin Ki ge
Present
Commissioner Mary Martin
Absent
Commissioner Gary Pearson
Present
Commissioner William Rossbac
Ab se
Commissioner Marvin Sigmun '
Ab nt
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. June 20, 1994
Commissioner Fischer Moved approval\of the minutes of June 20, 1994 as submitted.
Commissioner Gerk seconded
The motion pXssed.
-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Gerke
Abstentions -- Frost, Kittridge, Pearson
IV. APPROVAL OF /AGENDA
Commissioner Fischer moved approval of the agenda as submitted.
Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes- -all
The motion passed.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Bittersweet Estates: Land Use Change, Zoning Map Change, Street Vacation - Demont
Avenue (Bittersweet Lane to Flandrau Street), Remove "No Trespassing" Signs, Street
Vacation- Demont Avenue (East of Bittersweet Lane), Preliminary Plat (Section 10)
Ken Roberts, Associate Planner, presented the public hearing notice and staff report
and answered questions from the Commission.
Planning Commission -2-
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
Bruce Mogren, 1 0116 67th Lane North, Stillwater, was present representing
Bittersweet Associates. John Kavanaugh, 758 East Fourth Street, St. Paul, owner of
the property identified as Dutlot A on the proposed plat, spoke concerning past
P P P gP
actions regarding his property. Mr.. Mogren said he is in agreement with the staff's
recommendations, except for the construction of the trail and the costs regarding the
g g
recommended improvements.
Chairperson Axdahl opened the public hearing for comments from the public. Joe
Zappa, 2522 Flandrau Street, spoke in favor of the proposed plat but said he is
opposed to the trail being built. Barbara Williams, 2591 Southlawn Drive, spoke in
favor of the trail. Ms. Williams said an access to Four Seasons Park is needed, since
County Road C has no wag path and is not a suitable route for children to walk
to the park. Marie Weber, 2586 Southlawn Drive, s oke in favor of the trail. Since
P
there were no der comments, the public hearing was closed.
The Commission discussed whether 12 feet is necessary for the width of the walkway
to access the sanitary sewer manhole on the north property line. Ken Haider, Director
of Public Works, commented that 12 feet is necessary to maintain the integrity of the
trail, since the public works trucks need about eight feet for access and would break
down the edges of an eight -foot trail.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan from R -1 (single
dwellings) and OS (open space) to R -1 (single dwellings). This change is
because:
1. The proposed open space corridor is developed or proposed to be developed
with single dwellings.
2. A trail on Flandrau Street would preserve the intent of the open space
corridor by providing for pedestrian access between Bittersweet Lane and
Four Seasons Park.
Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes - -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend:
B. Adoption of the resolution which changes the zoning of the Bittersweet Estates
plat from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1 (single dwellings). The
reasons for this zone change are the findings required by ordinance and because
the R -1 zone would be more compatible with the Bittersweet Lane neighborhood.
Planning Commission -3-
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
Commissioner Gerke seconded Ayes- -all
The motion passed.
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
C. Adoption of the resolution which vacates the Demont Avenue right -of -way
between Bittersweet Lane and Flandrau Street, except the west 98.95 feet. The
west 98.95 feet shall be limited to public utilities and a public trail. The City
should vacate this street easement because:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this easement.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
4. The City cannot vacate the remaining easement because there is public
interest in a trail.
This vacation is subject to the developer recording this resolution with the final
plat. The City shall not release this resolution until the City approves the final
plat.
D. Direct the Public Works Department to remove the "No Trespassing" signs at
either end of Demont Avenue between Flandrau Street and Bittersweet Lane.
E. Adoption of the resolution which vacates the Demont Avenue right -of -way
between Bittersweet lane and the vacated Southlawn Avenue right -of -way. The
City should vacate this street right -of -way because:
1. It is in the public interest.
2. The City has no plans to build a street on this easement.
3. The adjacent properties have street access.
This vacation is subject to the following conditions:
1. Retaining a drainage easement over the south ten feet of the north 30 feet.
of the west 169 feet of the above- described right -of -way.
2. The City shall not record this resolution until the developer has completed
the grading on the right -of -way.
Commissioner Fischer seconded Ayes - -all
Planning Commission -4-
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
F. Approval of the Bittersweet Estates preliminary plat (received by the City on
April 22, 1994). Before the City Council approves a final plat, a developer shall
complete the following conditions:
1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or
contractor will:
a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public
improvements and meet all City requirements.
b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits.
c. Pay the City for the cost of traffic - control and street identification signs.
d. Construct an eight-foot-wide paved walkway and fencing between Lots
3 and 4 of Block 1 from the cul -de -sac to the existing sanitary sewer
manhole on Lot 4, Block 1. Also construct a 12- foot -wide paved
walkway from the existing sanitary sewer manhole on Lot 4, Block 1 to
Flandrau Street near the north property line. If requested by the
adjacent property owners, the developer shall provide a fence on.one or
both sides. The developer shall install posts at each end of the trail to
prevent cars or trucks from using the trail. The developer shall build the
entire trail and any required fencing with the street. The City Engineer
must approve these plans. The City will reimburse the developer for the
cost of the trail and any fencing that is beyond the plat boundaries. The
City is requiring that the developer pay for the part of the trail within
the plat since the trail will provide park access to the residents of the
new plat.
e,* Provide all easements required by the City Engineer.
f. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer
easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall
state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling, or dumping.
g. Install survey monuments along any wetland boundary.
h.. Remove any debris, junk or fill from the wetlands.
i. The developer shall use the Cottages property to haul in fill material.
The developer may use Bittersweet Lane for normal development
construction traffic.
Planning Con = ssion -5-
Minutes. of 7 -5 -94
2-* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans.
These plans shall include: adin utility, drainage, erosion control tree
�' g ty g , .
trail and street plans. The building official must approve the retaining wall if
it will be over four feet tall. The plans shall meet the following conditions:
a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and
Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook..
b. The grading plan shall:
(1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information
for each home site.
(2) Include contour information for the land that the street
construction will disturb.
(3) Illustrate housing styles that reduce the grading on sites where the
developer can save large trees.
(4) The tree plan shall show:
(a) where the developer will remove, save or replace large trees
(b) the size and species of any trees that the developer will plant
as replacement trees
3. Show the following on the final plat:
a. A twenty- foot -wide utility and trail easement between Lots 3 and 4 of
Block 1, and along the north property line of Lot 4, Block 1
b. The existing storm water drainage easement on the east side of the site
c. A drainage easement on the northeast co�yier of Lot 1, Block 1, subject
to the City Engineer's approval. This easement shall be for the proposed
storm sewer.
d. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the
final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and
rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines.
4. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the
Watershed District.
Planning Comnussion -6-
Minutes of 7 -5 -94
5.* Give the City wetland easements over the two wetlands. These easements
shall cover the wetlands and any land within twenty feet surrounding a
wetland. The easement shall prohibit any building or structures within
twenty feet of the wetland or any mowing, cutting, filling or dumping within
ten feet of the wetland or within the wetland itself. The purpose of this
easement is to protect the water quality of the wetlands from homeowners'
fertilizer and to protect the wetland habitat from residential encroachment.
If the developer decides to final plat part of the preliminary plat, the City may
waive any conditions that do not apply to the final plat.
*The developer must complete these conditions before the City issues a grading
permit or approves the final plat.
Commissioner Fischer seconded
Commissioner Kittridge suggested that the trail would be better served if located
from the Bittersweet Lane cul -de -sac to the Flandrau Street cul -de -sac and then
went between Lots 13 and 14 of the Seasons Park Addition.
The Commission voted as follows:
Ayes-- Anitzberger, Axdahl, Fischer, Frost, Gerke, Pearson
Nays -- Kittridge
The motion passed.
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Maplewood fisted Care Living Fa 'ty (Section 11)
Secretary Olson resented the s report and answered questions from the
Commission.
Commissioner Fisch mov the Planning Commission reconsider items D and E of
the staff report reco e ation.
Commissioner PearsorYsonded Ayes- -all
The motion passed
Commissioner Frost moved the Planning Commission recommend:
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
The Maplewood City Council invites you to a public hearing. This hearing is about a
request to develop lots for eight homes. The project's name is Bittersweet Estates. The
applicant is Bittersweet Associates (Bruce Mogren). The location is Bittersweet. Lane,
south of Demons Avenue. The Council will hold this hearing on Monday, July 25, 1994
at 7:30 p.m. or later in the City .Hall Council Chambers (1830 East County Road B). Mr.
Mogren is requesting that the City approve:
1. A street vacation for parts of the undeveloped Demont Avenue on the north edge of
this site.
2. A change to the Cites zoning map from LBC (limited business commercial) to R -1
(single dwellings).
3. A preliminary plat for eight lots.
Staff is also recommending that the City:
1. Change the land use plan map to change the OS (open space) corridor through this
site to R -1 (single dwellings).
2. Vacate Demont Avenue from Bittersweet Lane to the vacated Southlawn Drive.
The City Council will consider the proposed changes or other appropriate changes. y
Call Geoff Olson at 770 -4562 for more information.
Sign language interpreters are available. You must request this service at least 96 hours
in advance. Call 770 -4524 to make arrangements.
PUBLISH: July 13, 1994
AGENDA ITEM �.
AGENDA REPORT
kation by Council:
Enaorse
TO: City Manager Modifi ed" , ;.'..
Raj 9.0tedi ....� .
FROM: Public Works Coordinator Date
SUBJECT: Award of Bid ---- Bituminous Overlay, Project 94 -09
DATE: July 18, 1994
Bid were received July 15, 1994, at 11 a.m. The low bidder, who provided all
information requested, is Ashbach Construction Comp Their bid was $22.85/ton.
There were two bids received. that were less per ton, Tower Asphalt at $22.50/ton
and Hardrives at $22.45 /ton. However, neither of these companies provided the
p p
required equal employment opportunity report.
It is recommended the city council award the contract t Ashbach Construction
Company in the amount of $22.85 /ton.
TABULATION OF BIDS
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meetin of the officials . desi for
a bid openin b the Cit Council of Maplewood was convened I at 11'a.m., Frida Jul
15 1994. The purpose of this meetin was to receive, open and publicl read aloud
bids for construction of 1994 Bituminous Resurfacin Project 94-09
Present were: Lance Lundsten, Michael Kane, and Jud Chlebeck
Followin the readin of the notice of advertisement for bids, the followin bids were
opened and read:
Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the cit clerk referred the . bids received to the
cit en instructin him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at
the re cit council meetin of Jul 25, 1994.
Meetin adjourned at 11:15 a.m.
4
Bid
Affidavit of
Bidder
Bid Amount
B ond
Noncollusion
EEO
Ashbach Const. Co.
$22.85/ton
5%
x
x
Hardrives
$22.45/ton
5%
x
No
Master Asphalt
$24.70/ton
5%
x
x
Midwest Asphalt
$25.15 /ton
5%
x
No
W.B. Miller
$22.95/ton
5%
x
No
Northwest Asphalt
$24.22 /ton
5%
x
Not complete
Tower Asphalt
$22.50/ton
5%
x
No
Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the cit clerk referred the . bids received to the
cit en instructin him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at
the re cit council meetin of Jul 25, 1994.
Meetin adjourned at 11:15 a.m.
4
RESOLUTION FOR AWARD.OF BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD MINNESOTA
that the bid of Ashbach Construction Co. in the amount of $22.85/ton is the lowest
responsible bid for the construction of 1994 Bituminous Resurfacing, City Project 94 -09
and the mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with
said bidder for and on behalf of the city.
The finance director is hereby authorized to make the financial transfers
necessary to implement the financing plan for the project.
=nn�j
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
TABULATION OF BIDS
PROJECT: BITUMINOUS RESURFACING, PROJECT 94
DATE: JULY 15,1994, 11 A.M.
..........
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . ...... ....... . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
.... ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... ........
.......... .........
. . . . . . . . ................
... .......... .
UN 17PR ICE
.. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
... .... ........
.........
OT
................................
.......
....... ...
. . . . . . . . . . ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . BID
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
.
....
.. ......
B O ND .................
ND_ I
........... ...........
. . . . . . . . . .
................ .........
. . . . . . . . . . . ..
FFID4'.BIDDER
:A
.... .. .
:N 0 N %__
C L
.0
........... ...........
. . .
........ ............
. . . . . . . . . . ..
. .. . . . . EEO
....
::::REPORT-'
-Ashbach Construction Co.
$22.85/ton
5%
x
x
Harddrives
$22.45/ton
5%
x
None
Master Asphalt
$24.70/ton
5%
x
x
Midwest Asphalt
$25.15/ton
5%
x
None
W.B. Miller
$22.95/ton
5%
x
None
Northwest Asphalt
$24.22/ton
5%
x
Not cm It
Tower Asphalt
.$22.50/Ton
5%
x
None
O ance Liu _.. ndsten
Michael Kane
J ChlefDeck
AGENDA NO
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager
RE: COMMUNITY CENTER:
DATE: July 18, 1994
INTRODUCTION
AGENDA REPORT Action by Cote 1
Endorsed„_,,,,
Modified.....
Re3ected
�fG�t^a' J�•+(t� Date —_
PURCHASE OF WEIGHT EQUIPMENT
The Community Center's FF &E budget includes the purchase of weight equipment. The ose ur
p p
of this report is to request City Council's approval of the purchase of circuit weight equipment for
the upper body,
BACKGROUND
The Community Center will offer free weights in a dedicated room; aerobic equipment such as
Nordic Track, stationary bikes, and stair steppers; and circuit weights. Circuit weight training uses
a wide variety of machines, and an individual rotates through a plan that is designed for the
person to exercise all parts of the body. The training program is broken down into three distinct
parts of the body - upper, torso, and lower.
Because of the intense, unsupervised use of this equipment, durability and quality of the
. q tY products
p
are very important. In addition, the industry reputation and appeal of the pieces of equipment are
a valuable marketing tool that will enhance the image of the fitness programmin g in the Center.
With these things in mind, the Community Center Manager researched several different brands of
equipment. Since there are advantages and disadvantages in utilizing two different
g g manufacturers
in the same circuit training program, two companies were selected to submit ro osals on the
p p
three different body portions of the program. Those companies are Nautilus and L C Y bex.
Council approval of only the upper body weights is being requested, because the cost of these
machines exceeded the $15,000 purchasing limit of the City Ma The machines necessary
ty g
for the torso and lower body have already been ordered through the City's purchase orders stem.
p Y
The bid information for the torso and lower body equipment is provided for Y our information.
Copies of the bids for the upper body are attached.
C bex Nautilus
Upper Body
$21,116.27 $21,293,13
:..nv:.vv:•: i•:• i}: i}: ti•:%:•: i}: r ii.:}:•::•:•' i.•:•::+.• ih+:•::•:: iY.•}'• :•::•:•:•:•i: ?•i:i ":r•v::.::::. �.•.•:::::.•.•�.•.•.•::::::..
.... �'•.,•..:>.; titi..:,}. i�> ti:; �: �• �. �.:•,. ��' ���������: i:: �':•• yti$. ��' �' �,.. ti' ��' �'''+ �•;:•:•.{•} Y.: 4} k• :•.4..h:'•::•i.•:•.•:•..•:::::n . %. .n.
.•:•' �� %.:'•,: ;•':ir ^ .i::•:::•:�:•ii�.'•:�:� �: i:: :•:�:•: {.i:�ii:�i:::••:•:�:•::• �: iii.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the bids submitted, it is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of
pp p
upper body circuit weight equipment from Cybex in the amount of $21,116.27.
2
� 1 • PR S 1�' 1�'
0 0�• 44 61 28885757 FRO FTTP-.IE_S
i
PRIS SOLIRCE
F I T N E S
July 11, 1994
Tom Eastman
City of Maplewood
BID: Ciruit Equipment: Upper Body
CYBEX
Lat Pulltlown.
Rowing
Chest Press
Fl
Shoulder Press
Lateral Raise
Bicep
Tricep
Subtotal
Total.
1,986.00
2,271.00
2,461.00
2,936.00
2,271.00
2,461..00
1,986.00
--1
18,358.00
,. 1 ) 193.27
21,116.27
8200 Grand Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55A20
(612 9 Fax (612)888 -5757
P
0 7- 13 - 14:44 $70377333i16 NAUTILUS Zt:1 (a.3
up W_Idi
NautiJus
July 13, 1994
� /1f� - : : .' .•� '.'
70: ;' ':: �..�� �.'1;1r %7 :n/ . :,r
City of Maplewood
Attn: Tom Eastman
1880 E County Read
B
Maplewood, MN 55109
NAUTILUS EQUIPMENT
PROPOSAL
QTY
ITEM
UNIT PRICE
c.roTAL
" TION
1 NEXT GENERA
10 Degree chest ✓
$2,480
2,460.00
$ 2 , 4 1 8 0.0 0
2,460.00
1 NEXT GENE RATION
s
Bench Press
2,3
2 , :3.70.00
1 NEXT GENERATION
NE XT GENERATION
Torso .�rxn too
Compound. Ro
2 1 385-00
2, 3 8 5.00
1
1. NEXT GENERATION
Latera Rai se ,�
2 ,68 0 .00
2,690 -00
2
? 590.04
,
T GENERATION
I NEX
1 NEST GENERATION
Overhead Press!
Multi-Biceps t/
2 ,49Q. 00
2 � X90.00
1 NEXT GENERATION
Multi-Triceps,./
2,490-00
2 X90.00
,
$24,Q45.00
machine Total
(2 ,004.50)
Less: Volume Purchase Allowance
.(2
0.50
l.
Subtotal
1., 172.63
�,
' Sales Tax @ �� . 5 0
Shipping /Delivery /Installa
2r080-0
$21
TOTAL
Upho
Frames:
Shields:
Prices listed are valid for 45 days and are for standard colors*
• upholstery colors are available at an addi.tion�:�l
Special paint and p � L
charge. Please fill in our selection of colors _before acing .:�n
p lacing
orde . A surcharge may b re quired f or difficul t deliveries.
A de posit of 2 �
o of the total ($4,258.63) wi ll conf i rm your order.
cha y ou sa'Jes tax we must have a copy of your tax
To avoid g g y
• ate, The balance is due via certified or cashier r s check
exempt ce
at t i - me of delivery. �' ivex . PI-ease allow approximately 60 days for dell' very
�.
from date of conf irmatio.:n .
Thank you,
Chuck Fedorka
Midwest Regional Manager
or 4OW /
MEMORANDUM
Action by, Council t,
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Appointment Procedure
DATE: July 18, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Endorsed..
Modified�....�. .►
Re j ected�,
3
The Council needs to appoint new members to the Planning Commission, Community
Design Review Board (CDRB) and Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The
City Council should decide when and how they want to make these appointments.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission, CDRB and HRA have interviewed ap for vacan
ties.
The Planning Commission has six applicants for two vacancies. The CDRB has two
applicants for one vacancy. The HRA has one applicant for one vacancy.
PP
The Council has used a variety of procedures to appoint new board members. Several
years ago, the Council briefly interviewed the candidate recommended by the board or
commission at a regular Council meeting. The Council relied on the board's or
commission's recommendation. Lately, the Council has been interviewee all or Y g s ome of
the candidates at a council- manager meeting. The Council has then been usin g ballots
to vote for the applicants before the regular council meeting. The votes have been
tallied, the high -vote getter was invited to the meeting and the appointment made at
pp
the regular meeting.
On ,Tune 27, 1994, the Council decided to have the commissions do the initial screening
and recommend the top two candidates for each opening. The Council requested that
. g re q
the boards and commissions provide position qualifications 'ob descriptions).
�
DISCUSSION
I have attached the sections from Cit ode that state the duties responsibilities.
ty and of
the Planning Commission and Community Design eview Board. ( See es 3 - 5. � a p ages ) The
memo on page 7 describes the HRA's duties from State Statutes that apply to
Maplewood. As to qualifications, the Planning Commission's Rules of Procedure state
that the Commission shall make its recommendation based on ualifications and nd a
representative geographical distribution of members. I have attached the section on the
CDRB in City Code that describes the Board's make-up. a e T p page 6) he HRA does
not have specific qualifications. Of course, all candidates must be Maplewood residents.
Because of the variety of past appointment procedures, the Council should decide how
to appoint new board or commission members. The Council should then add this
procedure to their Rules of Procedure. We would then know how to handle future
appointments.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Interview the HRA and CDRB candidates at the August 1Council- Manager meeting.
2. Interview the top three Planning Commission candidates after the August 4 pre-
agenda meeting.
3. Add the following language to section 14(A) (2) of the Council's Rules of
Procedure: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.)
SECTION 14; COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES
2. Each commission or board shall interview candidates for vacancies on their
commissions or boards. If there are enou h candidates each commission or
board shall recommend one more candidate than the number of vacancies. As
an exam 1e there should be two candidates for one vacancv or three
candidates for two vacancies.
If there are o,nly enough recommended candidates for the vacancies available
the Council shall interview the candidates at a rezular council. meetin . If there
is more than one recommended candidate the Council shall interview
the
candidates at a Council. Mana er meeting or after a re -a enda meeting. tiny. The
manager shall schedule the meeting The Council shall vote on ballots for
candidates for each iDosition. The manager shall tally the votes and invite the
to vote- etter s to the next Citv Council meetin . The Council shall make
their a ointments at a rezular council meetin . All
A "A ' Fitees te
A a
Rules
go /b- 7:appts.mem (4.7)
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Duties
2. CDRB Duties
3. CDRB Membership
4. Memo on HRA Duties
2
Attachment 1
PLANNING AND ZONING AGENCIES § 25.23
(b) Vacancies shall be filled by the council for the unexpired
port of the vacated term. (Code 1965, § 202.030; Ord. No. 263, §
4
Sec. 25 -22. O ers; meetings;' s of procedure; public at
tend e.
(a) The planning . co ion sh Al elect its own officers, estab-
lish meeting tim ,and ado 'ts own rules of procedure to be
reviewed and proved by the ci ouncil.
(b) . eetings of the planning co ' ssion shall be open to
the e lic. (Code 1965, §§ 202.040, 202.10 ,Ord. No. 263, § 5,
:. -70; Ord. No. 650, § 2, 8- 28 -89)
Sec. 25 -23. Duties and responsibilities.
The duties of the planning commission shall be as follows:
(1) To prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan of devel-
opment for the city;
(2) To conduct hearings and make recommendations to the city
council in regard to the adoption of the city comprehensive
plan and any amendments thereto. The comprehensive plan
certified and adopted by the city council shall be recognized
as the city official comprehensive plan;
(3) To study and make recommendations to the city council in
regard to implementing the comprehensive plan and regula-
tions thereof;
(4) To study and make recommendations to the city -council in
regard to amendments to the zoning code;
(5) To review, prepare and make a report to the city council by
the second city council meeting in February of each year
regarding the commission's activities in the past year and
major projects for the new year.
(6) To maintain a liaison and coordination with government and
private agencies so that the city council may be cognizant if
the planning activities of such agencies in order to establish
an order of planning and development unity for the city;
Supp. No. S 1541
` 3
§ 25 -23 MAPLEWOOD CODE
(7) To review and recommend on or before May first of each
year a capital improvements program to the city cou ncil,
which is designed to accomplish y cil,
the sh the comprehensive plan. for
e city; and
(8) To review and make recommendation
s to the city council
on development applications, such as rez
tional use permits, variance onings, condi-
s, vacations, pre ' ary plats
and home occupation licenses;
(9) To accept such other and further
er duties as may, from time
to time, be directed by the city council including
s. � ncluding con -
ducting hearings. (Code 1965, § 202.070; Ord. No. 263
4 -2 -70; Ord. No. 650 § 3 - ' § 7
. � § , 4, 8 28 89)
Sec. 25 -24. Compensation; . � expenses,
members of the planning commission
n shall serve without com-
pensa ' n. HoWeverp approved expenses of the plan ' g commis -
sion shal a paid from available city unds.
[§ 2 • d• �, y (Code 965, § 208.090
02.090
], No. 263, § 8, 4-2-70)
0)
J
J �
_ Sec. 25.25. St f—Director of tan •
p ng responsible for
corre ondence, doc ts, minutes, records
files, etc. '
Subject to the direction o e nin •
p g commission and its chair- =y
man, the city director of plann shall conduct a
of the commission send 1 correspondence
d out not es required, attend all meeting
and hearings of the com 'ssion, kee the g
the commission's ockets and minutes of
on's pros dings, compile 11 required records,
maintain the necessa -files and indexes o e and
commission. (Code
1965 § 202.050; Or . No. 263, § 6 4 -2 -70
Sec. 25 -26, ame —City engineer;
city atto ey, city in-
spectors; other city employees.
(a) T' services of the city • shall
be ava' able t y ngmeer and the city attorn
o the planning commission. The said en ine
atto ey shall ht to sit ' g er and
have the right in with the commission at all
m tings, but shall not be entitled to vote as AI a member of aid
ommission.
Supp. No. 8
1542
4
Community Design Review Board Ordinance t2nd Reading)
report.
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff p
"Pe.- V-t..
Attachment 2
b. Councilmember Rossbach introduced second reading of the following Ordinance an
moved its adoption:
ORD INANCE NO. 719
CE CHANGING THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES AN ORDINANCE SIBILITIES SECTION
OF THE COHMN ITY DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ORDINANCE
The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance:
Section 1. This section changes Section 25.660
Sec tion 25 -66. Duties and responsibilities - -generally.
The duties and respons ibilities i ilities of the community design review board shall be to:
• proposal al s excluded from review under secti 25-
(1) Review all building di ng plans , except p o • p f chapter
review sign n s pl i cats ons as requ� red n article III o p
65. The board shall 9 P
36.
(Z) ApprOVe, modify
• , deny or table an y matter they review. The board, however, shall
not review interior designs.
ins and advi an applicant of the date, time and
(3) Hol regularly scheduled meet g will review the applicant "s application. The st aff shall
place when the board
• within 350 feet of the appl i cant' site of the meeting,
noti the property owners l i cant' s proj
nl
u nless the City Council will hold a hearing on the app
u ..
(4) Make a dec based on a staff repo rts the findings required by th Code and the
-
applicant's presentation.
• January thirty-first of each year outlining
C5) Prepare a report to the City Council by y ma
P Burin the recedi year. The report Y
the board's actions and activities 9 P and/or
• n includi but not limited to, ordinances a
include recommended cha es g
procedures.
Section 2 . This ordi s hall take effect after the City approves this ordinance
and has it published.
Seconded by Co
uncilmember Carlson Ayes • all
Z—Iy
5
Attachment 3
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE SIZE OF THE COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD FROM SIX TO FIVE MEMBERS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of
Ordinances:
Section 1. This section changes Section 25.63(x) -(c) as follows: (I have underlined the
additions and crossed out the deletions.)
Sec. 25 Member hip.
(a) The community design review board shall consist of five (6) .members._
T_ h�ity Council shall appoint all AM members of the b oard ho
eii�y eeen Each appointment shall be for IM1 1 4 448 1 1 1 W
me.m.4L,..eF-s shell J
claall -sere a two (2) year term.
_(-e-} Council appointed members shall be as follows:
vne 6
(1) Two-ft) architect if available to serve;
(2) Two (2) members shall be from a related design or construction field, i.e.
landscape .architects, interior designers, planners, civil engineers, contractors,
appraisers, realtors, etc.. if available.
(3) All of the above members shall, if applicable, be registered and licensed to
practice in the state;
(4). At least (2) members of the community design board shall be citizen
laymen.
Section. 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the City publishes it in the official
newspaper.
The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 14 A J 19940
MEMORANDUM
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Director of Community Development
SUBJECT:
HRA Duties
DATE:
July 13, 1994
Section 462 of State law lists an HR.A's duties. The sections that apply 1 to the
Maplewood HRA are as follows:
L Review plans for housing redevelopment projects.
2. Make plans to:
a. carry out a program of voluntary repair and rehabilitation of buildings and
improvements, and
b. enforce laws, codes and regulations about the use of buildings, includin g the
repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal of buildings.
3. Determine where there is substandard, deteriorated, unsafe, unsanitary or
overcrowded housing.
4. Undertake and carry out studies and analyses of the City's housing and
redevelopment needs and of the meeting of those needs.
5. Inform the public about housing and redevelopment programs.
60 Recommend changes to housing codes.
7. Make recommendations about the repair, closing, condemnation or demolition of
unsafe, unsanitary, hazardous or unfit buildings.
8. Review the housing section of the comprehensive plan.
9. Review requests to the City for housing grants or loans.
7
. oomo� /
INTRODUCTION
Robert Deese is requesting that the City Council waive the required parking for a
proposed tenant at the Crown Plaza Shopping Center. Mr. Deese represents Brentwood
Commercial Real Estate. The tenant is the Palm Night Club, anon- alcoholic dance and
social club. (See the location map and site plan on pages 3-4.) With this use the Code
requires 459 parking spaces for the entire center. There are 322 spaces. Consequently,
the center is 137 spaces short. (See the letters on pages 5 and 6.) The City Code allows
the City Council to change the required number of parking spaces [Section 36 -22( a)].
BACKGROUND
On July 8, 1991 the City Council reduced the required parking by sixteen spaces for T
Birds Sports Bar. T Birds is at the Maplewood Square shopping center. T Birds was
q pp g
planning to add an outdoor patio. The Council approved that request on the basis that:
1. Bird's peak customer ti
T me is in the evening when many of the shops are closed.
2. There have not been any serious parking problems at Maplewood Square,
3. There is a reciprocal parking agreement between this shopping center and the
Maplewood Mall.
4. The outdoor seating would be a seasonal use, dependent on the weather.
DISCUSSION
Two of the Council's reasons for approving the T Bird request apply to the Palm Night
Club request:
1. The Palm Night Club's peak customer time would be in the evening when many of
the shops are closed.
MEMORANDUM
Action by Couneil:i
TO:
City Manager
]Endorse
FROM:
Chris McGlincey, Planning Intern
SUBJECT:
Parking Waiver
]Rejecte
LOCATION:
1700 Rice Street ( Crown 1 a P az }
Date
PROJECT:
Palm Night Club
APPLICANT:
Brentwood Commercial Real Estate
DATE:
July 14 1994
INTRODUCTION
Robert Deese is requesting that the City Council waive the required parking for a
proposed tenant at the Crown Plaza Shopping Center. Mr. Deese represents Brentwood
Commercial Real Estate. The tenant is the Palm Night Club, anon- alcoholic dance and
social club. (See the location map and site plan on pages 3-4.) With this use the Code
requires 459 parking spaces for the entire center. There are 322 spaces. Consequently,
the center is 137 spaces short. (See the letters on pages 5 and 6.) The City Code allows
the City Council to change the required number of parking spaces [Section 36 -22( a)].
BACKGROUND
On July 8, 1991 the City Council reduced the required parking by sixteen spaces for T
Birds Sports Bar. T Birds is at the Maplewood Square shopping center. T Birds was
q pp g
planning to add an outdoor patio. The Council approved that request on the basis that:
1. Bird's peak customer ti
T me is in the evening when many of the shops are closed.
2. There have not been any serious parking problems at Maplewood Square,
3. There is a reciprocal parking agreement between this shopping center and the
Maplewood Mall.
4. The outdoor seating would be a seasonal use, dependent on the weather.
DISCUSSION
Two of the Council's reasons for approving the T Bird request apply to the Palm Night
Club request:
1. The Palm Night Club's peak customer time would be in the evening when many of
the shops are closed.
2. There have not been any parking problems at the Crown Plaza.
The other two reasons would not apply. The Crown Plaza request is for 139 fewer
spaces than the Code requires, while T Bird's request was for only 1 spaces. If a
parking problem develops, the City should require that the Palm Night Club end.
The fire marshal is requesting that the shopping center owner ut u no parking signs
P p p g �
on the west side of the ABRA building. The signs would help keep the fire lane open.
RECOMMENDATION
Reduce the required number of parking spaces by 139 spaces for the Crown Plaza
Center. This will allow the proposed Palm Night Club. The City bases its approval on
the following findings:
1. The Palm Night Club's peak customer time will be in the evening when many of
the shops in the center are not open.
2. The shopping center has more parking spaces than it uses.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. If the City determines there is a shortage of parking spaces, the shopping center
owner shall evict enough of its tenants to provide adequate on -site parking. The
owner shall put this requirement into the Palm Nig Club lease.
2. The shopping center owner shall p no p signs ut u arkin g on the west side of the
p
ABRA building.
go \b- 7:laoclub.mem (18)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Plan
3. Letter from Mr. Deese
4. Letter from Chang Vang
P,
Attachment 1
• ? W W
O t� 0
•d- C3 C3 •�'
A B C
to 240ON
•
LITTLE CA NADA
• • • • • • i • ••••• ♦ • ,• / • • •• • •
4 �9
•
• ,^ •
• D • •f •
•
LAM( AVE. CL o
t •. LAUR IE RD. W
4► <
• • 57 .a W 0 L
�� ti•
•_
0 0 %.4 to to
• ' • COUNTY RD. B - Cr. o
W
z � ••
AV E. a RIDGE o
CL rc tfn� J.
Sa Y BELMONT LA. W 4ah
LAks �• :� �. c AVE. SKIL
CI �n i / LS
• �' '� SKILLMAN
SKILLMAN AVE.
._• •
.� WT. VMNN j � Z �
' �n
• °� o ao low . W
w AVE. 3 NT• VERNON AV
.�' DO NS o 0 o E tr.
000wow P"
. • '� vi � a
• •. ROS
• ' Z6 BELLwo
.. • �b 0 B ELLw0O0 AVE. 9 EL WOOD o AVE.
0 • .• • •
• . 0 SUM AVE y- o SUET .
Z n c
• . F•ENTON AVE. a W
• RIPLEY m Z
1 omb"1 o � � �
• �E MW AVE.
0
J.
RIPIEY AVE. RE
KINGSTON cn KIN GSTaN < AVE.
. •� W
�' 0 0 v � Ot'�` � � o AVE• � �+ PRICE Z' A
• J Y T
W = U W [ <
oc < o o a
m
-� LARP E t�lT'EUR AV'E•
+ • • . • • ;•
• •• • • • • • • • • •• ••• • • • • • i • • . • • • • • ••
• . •• • • ••• •• • • • •• • •• • M •• , • • • �• / s • •• • • • • •• • • ••
49!
LOCATION MAP
3
Q
N
Attachment 2
LIBR A CAR WASH
336 SO., FT, CROWN PLAZA PYLON
--
O
A � r
L L J)
GOODYEAR
Pa Ir^ N��++'
Frft o f o
oil
BURGER KING PYLON � O
BURGER KING
144 SO. FT. CROWN PLAZA PYLON
LARPEN7EUR AVM.
BURGER KING PYLON
0
am
Attachment 3
BRENMOOD
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC.
6600 City West Parkway, Suite 130
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -3261
June 21, 1994 (612) 942 -9420 FAX (612) 942 -9419
Mr. Tom Ekstrand
City of Maplewood
1800 East County Road 13
Maplewood, MN 55109
Re: Crown Plaza Shopping Center
1700 Rice Street
Maplewood, Minnesota
Dear Tom:
Per our conversation, I am writing to you on behalf of the owners of Crown Plaza to
request a waiver in the parking requirements for a proposed LAO social club at the
shopping center.
While I realize we are short of parking., I want to strongly emphasize that all activifles
proposed will be taking place in the evenings. As such, this will cause very ittle, ff any,
Y
inconvenience to the existing tenant base at Crown Plaza. The center needs to have this
space filled to avoid more empty space and an ongoing financial hardship to the owners,
g g p
As of June 30, 1994, of the 71 28.0 square feet in the center 29,537 square feet is .vacant.
This represents a forty -one percent vacancy- -very high by any and all measurements.
On behalf of the owners, we really need to get the social club accomplished in a short
time frame. I will be in touch with you next week to begin the rocess to a ear bef ore
p pp
thaw city cowncil as u ck!y as can be accomplished.
Sincerely yours,
Brentwood Commercial Real Estate, Inc.
Robert E. Deese, CPM
Sr. Vice President
RED /crs
cc: Chang Vang
crownWkstrand Ar
5
UNFOLDING REAL SOLUTIONS TO YOUR REAL ESTATE CHALLENGES"
■ Brokerage ■ Property Management ■ Consulting
June 10, 1994
Chan Van
1422 Barcla St.
St Paul, MN 55106
Dear Mr, Ekstrand. 0
I am writin in response to y our concerns about the potential
parkin problems with Palm Ni Club and restaurant and g e.neral
shoppin Because of the difference of peak use of the parkin
spaces, we do not anticipate an conflict.
The period of time that we expect to have the hi number of
customers will be in the evenin when man of the near b shops are
a lread y closed., We also feel that parkin at Crown Plaza will not
be a serious problem due to the fact that Palm Ni Club will be
non-alcoholic, and our tar customers will be y outh and the
majorit of them do not have their driver's license y et.
As y ou are probabl aware of, the Hmon communit is experiencin
a lot of difficulties with our y outh due to the lack of activities
to keep them occupied. We feel that this club will not onl allow
our y outh a wa of havin fun but also an alternative to en
a
in unpleasant activities,
. 1 1
Thank y ou for y our concerns and assistance in this matter if
there are an further q uestion,, feel free to call me at (Home 778- -
0045) , (work 487-3466) , or (pa 650-9451).
Sinc
Chanl]Vang
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Mounds Park Academy
DATE July 19, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Action by Cou neil:j
Endorsee] ..,,�.
Modified
ReJected
The City Council should consider the following items about Mounds Park Academy:
1. James Gandy is asking the City Council to interpret the code section about
screening or shielding parking lot lights. Mr. Gandy is the architect for the Mounds
Park Academy addition. On May 27, 1994, I directed Mounds Park Academy to
screen two of their parking lot lights. (See my letter on page 7.) Mounds Park
Academy is objecting to this. They feel their lights meet the Code requirement. (See
their letters on pages 8 -11.) We investigated the lights because of a complaint
from Barbara and David Moeckel. They own the adjacent property at 1722 Ruth
Street. (The map on page 5 shows their property and the location of the lights.)
Mr. Moeckel told me that several other neighbors complained about the glare from
the other lights.
2. The owners of three homes on Ruth Street are requesting additional fencing. They
want the proposed screening fence on the west side of the parking lot extended
across the Price Avenue driveway. (See their letter on page 12.)
3. The conditional use permit (CUP) for the Mounds Park Academy expansion is due
for review.
BACKGROUND
Past Actions
On February 25, 1992 the Community Design Review Board approved the plans to
expand Mounds Park Academy. The plans included a six- foot -high fence along the west
and south property lines. The fencing did not extend across the Price Street driveway.
The driveway was open then., The Board approved the fence location, subject to the
staff approving the design.
Condition Three of the Board's approval required the school to "Direct or screen all
parking lot and outside recreational facility lights so they do not glare onto adjacent
properties or streets. Light glare must not exceed one footcandle of light intensity at
residential lot lines."
On April 27, 1992, the Council approved a CUP for the expansion.
On May 10, 1993, the Council approved tax - exempt financing and decided to review the
CUP again in one year.
On June 14, 1993, the Council moved to restrict the driveway at Price Avenue and Ruth
Street with a type of blocking that emergency vehicles can use, and the block, be p laced
far enough from the intersection so residents can gain entrance to their garages.
On October 11, 1993, the Council moved to approve no parking on both sides of Price
Avenue, east of Ruth Street.
Code Requirement
Section 36- 28(c)(1) states that "Lighting shall not be directly visible from any
residential area or public street. Lighting shall not exceed one footcandle at a residential
property line."
DISCUSSION
Parking Lot Lights
There are four parking lot lights. The three closest to the west property line are causing
the most trouble. The lights do not exceed one footcandle, but they do glare onto
adjacent properties. On May 23, 1994, I measured one -half footcandle at the Moeckel's
lot line. However, the reflector from the light was glaring onto the adjacent property.
Mr. Gandy's letter debates the meaning in the code of "lighting shall not be directly
visible ". He feels that the lights meet the Code since the bulbs are not directly visible.
The code does not state that the bulb shall not be directly visible; the Code states that
the lighting shall not be directly visible. The reflector is an integral part of the lighting
because it directly reflects the light coming from the bulb. Whether the light comes
directly from the bulb or the reflector, the light is still directly visible.
The Community Design Review Board condition is more specific than the code. It
requires that the school "Direct or screen all parking lot and outside recreational facility
lights so they do not glare onto adjacent properties or streets." Webster's Collegiate
Dictionary defines glare as "A harsh uncomfortably bright light." I believe the Mounds
Park Academy parking lot lights meet the dictionary definition of glare.
Screening Fence
The Director of Public Safety recommends against extending the screening fence across
the Price Avenue driveway. He feels that the drive should be available for emergency
2
vehicles. The drive is now barricaded. A permanent fence across the drive would
prevent emergency vehicle access.
Time Extension
The Council should review this permit again on October 1. The Council can then make
sure that Mounds Park Academy has resolved the light problem.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Require that Mounds Park Academy do one of the following:
1 Screen the reflectors on the three westerly lights in the parking lot.
2. Replace the lights with fixtures that will not glare onto adjacent residential
property.
Mounds Park Academy must complete this work by October 1, 1994.
B. Take no action on the request to extend the screening fence.
C. Review the conditional use permit again on October 1, 1994.
go \b- 7:lighting.mem (14)
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
3. Site Plan
4. Letter from Tom Ekstrand dated May 27, .1994
5. Letter from James Gandy dated June 10, 1994
6. Letter from James Gandy dated May 9, 1994
7. Letter from Ruth Street residents
8. CUP
3
noun
Z oq d Hh
BEAM
Ri D . ATZ
AV
(19
N
&A
MAPLE
-
•
VIEW AV
ATTACHMENT - 1
�1
1 I�
70 I
KIS Al
QQ N ROSEVMO 1
N a A 'J i No Rm SAINT PAUL
0
N s
•: 0�' oo 29 68 119
AV 4• 28 �0� HOLLO AY
♦- 0 %, f p ".
a� SUM R t; W 1 Q $ F- o Hillsido W N
b W a PA -�
c a
121 A P'; , K OL L
o f a m RIP �� AV RI AV' C1 CLE
wA�i Lo Q
p. x a .j► K I Navo N AV _ ............ Z
PRICE I A O Z aC
o
L AKE = C E or ac w
i = MC KN/GH r LN �^
LARPE NTEUR
LOCATION MAP
4
N
4
•'
Ri D . ATZ
AV
W
_.... ..
•
POND
(;1 e c z l PRIvArr smirr.
v
" °'"'
W KO N L ILIA N AV
(AXSSAB/ AV)
v H
A
o
NORr SAINT PAUL
Pk
W
Z
o co >
R o n2,3 i "c"
T29N,R22W
W
3 2 K.
P Z
EH1LL RD 10
Horvest
W
Pk
DE MONT Av
9
h
W
8 RO
AV
Z
EL E v r
X TANT
Q
y Fovw
XTAN T AV Seosons
'J N
AV
c� st
PA
G ERYA I S
G ERW GE RYAS AV • .
AND AEW
AV Z
W
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillilillillilimm00
CT
MKI
OR "
TLE AV
36
N A V
Knuckle Head Lake
`
ca SZ L. Av �
RK
J v
Fj4
�n
RIE
L
a &
R
x
4
v LA RIE
RD
NU RST
MOOdPk=
tr z
AV
_
o
x
Co
> RD
o
AV
c
AbDrnAood
* . (
�
Ch►r t�+c/l �
N�
..
LOCATION MAP
4
N
4
4
A�
' � o
(2oiG .t a
0
AN -- ��_ ■ ■- ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■� ■ ■ ■ ■s�s�t■ -.1
�t.f 0, - II ATTACHMENT 2 • ■;
R3
s. -e 194 L55 m w r
•
s
r�
B N
N
c •,
or
• 1 r
�" ',, • •
o . oA f
411� J
C7
Q D
RI
;r•) ao 1792 : 1 t�f40�)SL
7 8 9 to It 12 1 3 14 4 l is sw•
r 1786 3
1780 ,o
22 21 20 19 Is 17 16 IS
h•) Csq 016- s') "As) .1772s
AV E ° Is 1736 cp J
. 7 e 9 10 it 12 13 1758 .0 i -p 0� t7
on 1752
i
22 21 20 19 ' .g 17 Is 1744 13
fir, .•s�; -s�. ;rs. . ss� . c.► i�l it I �+ .
2a,tc s 4 '
*• LAS
G
(1))
1
ARCHER HEIGHTS
APARTMEN TS,r-- �,�e, e b
sac
-
�� p UD}
• �4.os o►.c. j 1 1
� - P —
f
1
■, ■fit ■ ■ . ,�i ■ a-NJ
• WILLIA►.•S al pr t:tiE .0. 'E$Ae
00 000
1N ■
SO DS OF
A
MAPLEW OD
4
40 1
2ND e A DI
1736 NQ v ,. -- 1
/
AV E. x �f" l 4
de uj
MOECKEL PROPERTY 172
coo • ♦ � raa c7 � � � [ • >► 3 17 2 C a
0 11 Mel ! 12 14 ' r1 w
i t r
�o .� 12 . 011.1 1708 MOUNDS PARK ACADEMY ;.
• .0
5 1 71I 6A.. 1 1 •_s_�� ISO Uj
to
• . 13 V 9 w �.. 1700, otc i i MAPLEWOOD
Z
�,.._,�
.,PIN'. o no
14 PUMP STATION
9 6 • 1694; a .•
1686 13 2025
40-1 2095 .
• - ,,- - .. -
LARPENTEUR AVE. 1689 r
�
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP Q
• - ucrtrs CAUSING THE cuwE N
5
PROPOSED
B
PROPOSED
TENNIS COURTS
PROPOSED"
HOCKEY RINK
PROPOSED
ADDITIONS
s
M
cc
II.
EX[STING
BUILDING
SITE PLAN
6
LLOWAY AVE.
ATTACHMENT 3
5iats PROPOSED
SOCCER FIELD
�C.
�r
cl
ti..s,• •, IV
CITY OF ATTACHMENT 4
1til��PL�VV•OD
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B N1APLE1VOOD TIN ES0TA 50
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
May 27, 1994
James R Gandy
Architectural Forum, Inc.
4801 West 81st Street, Suite 101
.Minneapolis, MN 55437
LIGHT GLARE COMPLAINT
61 ?- < 04 560
This is to confi our May 27, 1994 telephone conversation about the ligh
rm t glare
complaint I received regarding Mounds Park Academy. This is also a fo:Iow -up to your
letter to me dated May 9, 19940
I agree that the light intensity does not exceed the one- footcandle threshold outlined by
the Code. I feel, however, that the light glare does violate the City Ordinance. The
enclosed ordinance says that "lighting shall not be directly visible from any residential
area or public street." The light glare from the light - fixture's reflector, however, is
directly visible from the concerned neighbor's bedroom window. The reflector is part of
the light source, even though it is not the bulb. It is the object that transmits the light
from the bulb.
As you asked, I am writing this letter so you may forward it to Mounds Park Academy.
Please review this with them as soon as possible and call me to &5cuss a solution to the
problem. I will check with you by the end of next week. I would like to establish a date
for the installation of screening devises to block the glare or to discuss other solutions
you may have.
THOMAS EKSTRAND - ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Enclosure
Equal Opportunity Employer
7
Attache
JUN 14 1994
June 10, 1994
C i ty of Map 1 ewood
1830 East County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
RE: Mounds Park Academy Parking Lot Lights
The zoning ordinance requires that we meet the following:
..Install parking lot lighting. Lighting shall not be directly
visible from any residential area or public street, Lighting shall
not exceed one footcandle at a residential property line.
Residential areas are areas p 1 anned or used for residential
purposes.
The problem is that part of the requirement is definitive and can be
measured with precise instruments. The other part of the ordinance
which states "lighting shall not be directly visible from any
residential area or public street is undefined and vague with no
measurab 1 e means of verifying conformance or non- -conformance when taken
at face va 1 ue . It would seem to state that any parking lot light which
can be seen from any public street would not be in conformance with the
ordinance. If this is in fact the intent, we know that there are very
few, if any, conforming parking lot 1 i ghts in the City of Map 1 ewood . If
this is not the intent then this portion of the ordinance should be
dropped or redefined to allow for quant i tat i ve verification.
Furthermore, the "Discussion to portion of our Conditional Use Perm i t
Summary stated that: .
"the applicant should direct or screen all lights so.that the bulbs
cannot be seen. Code does not allow light intensity to exceed one
foot - candle at a residential lot line $I .
This seems to go further than the City Ordinance in that it refers to
"the bulbs" instead of "lighting" which was as specific as the ordinance
went Since most parking lot lighting is now designed with the bulb
located well up into the housing of the fixture, out of direct view,
this appeared to be more consistent with today's lighting design standards
which rely on the ref 1 ector to spread the light from the bulb. We feel
conf i dent that we are in conformance with both of the requirements as set
forth in the C.U.P. Summary.
AICHITECTLML
f1DRUM. INC a
4801 WEST 81ST STREET, SUITE 101
8 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55437
612/831 -5926 ■ FAX 612/831 -9069
C i ty of Map 1 ewood
June 10, 1994
Page 2
Now after having met all of the above specific requirements, we have
been informed by the planning department that there is a Light Glare.
Comp 1 a i nt" and that they feel " l i g h t glare does violate the city
ordinance". We were not aware of "light g l are" being part of the city
ordinance and we have no idea how "light g l are" i s measured. (we do not
think the staff knows how to measure it either.)
We have also been informed that "the ref 1 actor is part of the light
source, even though it is not the bu 1 b" .. No where i's this new definition
i nc 1 uded as part of your ordinance, The planning department is using its
own subjective interpretation to expand the ordinance. Since virtually
all exterior parking lot fixtures now have ref 1 actors to spread the
light, why did the requ i rests of the C.U.P. refer to the "bulb" if it
was actually meant to be the reflector. They are not the same but
distinctly different and separate functioning parts of a light fixture .
The ref 1 actor is there specifically to spread light with reduced glare
versus the bulb.
we admit that. the parking lot light reflectors are visible from the
adjacent residential properties. I would also expect that they are
visible from some p 1 aces on Larpenteur Avenue, Beebe Road, Ruth Street
and Price Street, just as the Maplewood City Hall's parking lot light
reflectors are visible from sections of white Bear Avenue, County Road
B, adjacent residential properties and residential properties as far
away as those west of White Bear Avenue. The same could be said for
most if not all, of the parking lot lighting i n Map 1 ewood .
The planning department told us that two (2) of our parking lot fixtures
were going to be required to have screening devices installed on them
These two (2) fixtures were identified because of one individual
neighbor's complaint of the glare. The other two (.2) i dent i ca 1 fixtures
were not identified in my telephone conversations with Tom Eckstrand
because there had been no complaints regarding these fixtures. Tom
Eckstrand verified our contention that we meet the one foot - candle
requ i rat but not the unwritten and non - definitive " glare"
requirement. It should be noted that the allegedly non - conforming
parking lot fixtures are approx i mate 1 y 90 feet and 180 feet from the
property line and 160 feet and 250 feet from the complainants windows
(the house sets back approximately 70 feet from the property line).
City of Map 1ewood
June 10, 1994
Page 3
Mounds Park Academy is extremely concerned that any shielding the City
may require w'i l l reduce the present lighting 1 eve t in the school's
parking lot to a 1 eve l that the school feels would be unsafe There is
cons i derab 1 e pedestrian traffic through this parking lot after dark,
especially during the winter months Is the City prepared to assume
liability for mandating the school have a less than safe lighting 1 eve 1
in their parking lot?
No where does the ordinance state that it is only enforced if complaints
are received. We admit that the 1 ense /ref 1 ectors of our fixtures are
visible, but we believe we have demonstrated ,that the portion of the
ordinance stating "lighting shall not be directly visible" i s vague and
unmeasurable and that the planning department is adding arbitrary terms
and unc 1 ear definitions to meet one disgruntled i nd i v i dua 1' s wants in
this one particular instance. The ordinance scold be known and
measurab 1 e . We are only asking that our parking lot lighting be
eva 1 uated as all other parking lot lighting i n Maplewood is. We are
also asking that unless you are going to require parking lot lighting
throughout Maplewood to add shields to screen their lenses, that we not
be requ i red to do so either. We do not feel that one complaint shou l d
force our lighting to be held to a different standard than other
lighting throughout Map 1 ewood .
Sincerely,
ARCHITECTURAL FORME, INC,
James R. Gandy
Architect
JRG /gmb
cc: Paula Miller
Tom Weber
Bob Stennes
10
ATTACHMENT 6
May 9, 1994.
Tom Ekstrand
City of Map 1 ewood
1830 East County Road B
Map MN 55109
RE: Mounds Park Academy Parking Lot Lighting
Dear Tom:
The manufacturer ' s representati of the parking lot lighting instal at
Hounds Park Academy vis the s af ter dark on the evening of May 5, 19949
His visual observat i cans as well as the footcand 1 e readings using a high caliber
meter indicated that the school is in comp 1 i ance with the City's criteria for
approval for the Conditional Use Perm which required that "The app 1 i cant
should direct or screen all lights so the bulbs cannot be seen. Code does not
a 11 ow 1 i ght i ntens i ty to exceed one foot -cand 1 e at a res i dent i a 1 1 of 1 i ne ." The
manufacturer ' s representati did indicate that " reflector flash " is visible
from the school ' s west property line,
The representative further indicated that although no skirt is mace for this
fixture, a makeshift sheet metal skirt could be attached which would sh ield
this ref 1 ector flash.. The problem with this would be that the performance of
the f i xture would be altered and the entire west half of the parking lot would
be dark, This would create a safety concern for the school. HPA feels an
adequate 1 y lit parking lot i's essent i a 1 to creat a safe environment for the
students and teachers. This has a 1 ways been a high priority for the school.
Founds Park Academy takes pride in being a good neighbor and they are also in
comp 1 i ance with the City lighting requirements as required by the Conditional
Use Permi Any modification which would create a safety concern could not be
supported. If you have any questions or other suggestions as to how we could
accomplish both parties concerns, we would be very interested. HPA wants to
continue to stay on good terms with both the City and their neighbors.
Sincerely,
\ Im cowl�p;
James R. Gandy
Architect
JRG /gmb
cc: Paula Miller, PAPA
Tom Weber, Weber Consulting
Bob stennes, Collins Electric
AICHITECTUML
f INC.
4801 WEST 81 ST STREET SUITE 101
11 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55437
612/831 -5926 • FAX612/831 -9064
qw
47
ATTACHMENT 7
If
Z
. ..... ........... .....
00
20, ��-
lee
let
loot
cz
��3 QclTGi yi, n,a�
M WOW
NTI MN7
12 777-
rA"
ATTACHMENT 8
� 2. Conditional Use Permit: 2051 E. Larpenteur Ave. (Mounds Park Academy)
_J a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
C. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Jacob Buxell, Architect
Kathleen Wind, Assistant Superintendent of District 622
d Councilmember Zappa introduced the followin4 Resolution and moved its
adoption:
92 -04 -39
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, Mounds Park Academy applied for a revision of the conditional
use permit for a school.
WHEREAS, they applied for this revision to allow them to expand the
existing school,
WHEREAS, this permit applies to 2051 E. Larpenteur Avenue. The legal
description i
Tracts D, E and H of Registered Land Survey No. 396 as recorded in
the off of the Ramsey County Registrar of Titles and a parcel of
land d escribed as follows
Commencing at a. point distant 33 feet West of the Northeast corner
of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, Township 29, Range 22; thence running
West 26 rods; thence South 22 rods; thence East 26 rods; thence
North 22 rods to the point of the beginning, which lies within the
West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section
14, Ramsey County, MN.
WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows:
1. The Planning Commission discussed this appl on February
18, 1992. They recommended that the City Council approve said
permit .
2. The City Council held a public hearing on April 13, 1992. City
staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the
surrounding property owners as required by law. The Council
gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present
written statements. The Council also considered reports and
recommendations of the City staff and Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above -
described conditional use permit for the following reasons:
13
4 -27 -92
The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and
operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan
and Code of Ordinances.
2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of
the surrounding area.
3. The use would not depreciate property values.
4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials,
equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous,
hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nui s.ance to any
person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke,
dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run-
off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference
or other nuisances.
5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local
streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access
on existing or proposed streets.
6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and
services, including streets, police and fire protection,
drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks.
7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public
facilities or services.
8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the
site's natural and scenic features into the development design.
9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. o.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. All construction must comply with the site plan, date - stamped
January 14, 1992. The City Council may approve major changes,
after a public hearing and recommendation from the Community
Design Review Board. The Director of Community Development may
approve minor changes. The Academy may phase the development
plan.
2. The City Council shall review t h i s permit one year from the date
of approval, based on the procedures in City Code. The City
may, at that time, direct the closure of the Price entrance if
traffic problems continue.
3. The school shall turn the tennis court lights off by 9 :00 p.m.
Only the school shall use the tennis court lights.
4. The school shall only use the area between the tennis courts and
pond and the west lot line as a track or route for running
during fall and spring cross - country meets.
5. The City Council may require that the Academy build a driveway
to Beebe Road through the School District's property if the
Academy buys the School District's b u i l d i n g ,
14 4 -27 -92
0
6. The City Counci -1 may require that the school chain the westerly
access for evening events if they become a problem.
Seconded by Counci lmember Rossbach Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson Juker,
Rossbach, Zappa
Nays - Mayor Bastian
e. Co ncilmember Zappa moved to authorize all -wa sto si at _Price
v a Qns and
Seconded 8y Council member Carlson
Ayes - Councilmembers Carlson, Juker,
Rossbach, Zappa
Nays - Mayor Bastian
t
15
AGENDA NO,
AGENDA REPORT Action b Coun
Endorsecl.... W City Manager ltodifie___
FROM: Assistant City Manager
Date
RE: COMMUNITY CENTER: CONTRACT FOR INTERIOR LANDSCAPING
DATE: July 15, 1994
INTRODUCTION
As part of the Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E) budget for the Community Center, there
is $35,000 designated for interior landscaping. This kind of work involves the design, construction
and installation of artificial plants, trees, and decorations for public areas. The purpose of this
report is to request City Council approval of a contract for this service.
BACKGROUND
The Community Center Manager has met with three companies to discuss their services, costs,
and products. Tom Eastman was most satisfied with a company named OF DISTINCTION INC.
They proposed a native Minnesota theme for the interior landscaping. The various artificial plant
materials will have birch, maple, and other replicas of Minnesota plant Fife.
Areas of the building which will be decorated include the pool, corridors, banquet and meeting
rooms, and the track.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve a contract with OF DISTINCTION, INC. for a
maximum of $35,000 for the design, construction, and installation of the Communi ty Center's
interior landscaping.
AGENDA NO. JftvL. 4
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager
v
RE: AMENDMENT TO COMMUNITY CENTER'S COMPUTER
SYSTEN! REPORT
DATE: July 25, 1994
The attached detailed listing of computer hardware and software is an amended
budget for the Community Center request. The MIS Coordinators and the ArneriData
consultant re- evaluated the design of the computer system and generated the new
list.
The consultant will attend the August 1, 1994 Council /Man.ager workshop. He will
talk about replacing the current mini- computer in City Hall with a network that will tie
into the Community Center's system.
It is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of an amount not to
exceed $37,068 for the purchase of the Community Center's computer system.
City of Maplewood
Community Center
July 22, 1994
I tem o
Desedptlon
Rd eserver
1 CPQ - 148100 -00
Compaq Deskpro XL 466, Model 535 /CDS, 486DX2
Processor (Pentium upgradeable), 66MHz, 8KB
Cache, 53 5MB Hard Drive (1 Oms),1.44MB (3.5")
Floppy, CD -ROM, 8MB Memory, 32 -bit Fast SCSI -2
Controller, 32 -bit Ethernet Controller, QVision 2
Graphics Controller, 2MB VRAM, 5 Expansion Slots
(3 EISA,1 EISA/PCI, I PCI), 2 Available Drive Bays,
2 Serial, Parallel/Mouse ports, Compaq Vocalyst
Keyboard w /Speaker & Microphone, Audio Input/
Output Connectors, MS -DOS 6, Windows 3. 1
TabWorks, Windows Sound System, Novell Universal
NetWare Client
includes 3 year warranty (1 st year on -site)
1 CPQ - 148193 -00
535MB Fast - SCSI -2 Hard Drive for Compaq
Deskpro YL
1 CPQ- SP -8MS
8MB Single - socket Memory Module for Compaq
Deskpro/L, 486/25, Systempro, Enhanced System -
pro 486/33
1 CPQ- 143800 -50
Compaq SVGA Color Monitor, 14 ", Energy Saver
compliant
1 APC -600
American Power Conversion Smart Uninterruptible
Power Supply (600VA) for 386 and 486 File Servers,
5.0 AMPS, requires NSP- PWR -M/AT which contains
both the cable and network management software.
1 NSP- PWR -M/AT American Power Conversion AT/MCA Powerchute
Software w /Cable, works wBack & Stand UPS
1 A -MNS VC 1 YR
First Year On -site Warranty Service for a new system.
Covered equipment includes approved CPU/
Keyboard/Internals/Monitor.
Priority parts response within 4 hours.
1 A -SETUP
Setup equipment, test
SubTotal
Unit Extended
$3,273 $3
$673 $673
$518 $518
$337 $337
$385 $385
$89 $89
$350 $350
$31 $31
$5,656
- Continues -
City of Maplewood, Community Center
AmeriData
July 22, 1994
Page 2
SoTotal $6
- Continues -
Unit Extended
hem No,
Desc riptLon
Workstation
8 CPQ - 164650 -00
Compaq Enhanced ProLinea 4/66, Model 2004,
$1,636 $13,088
486DX2 Processor (Pentium upgradeable), 66MHz,
200MB Hard Drive (I 3.5ms), l .44MB (3.5 ") Floppy,
4MB Memory, Local Bus Video Graphics Controller,
M0 DRAM, 3 Expansion Slots, 1 Available Drive
Bay, 2 Serial, Parallel/Mouse ports, Keyboard, Mouse,
MS -DOS 6, Windows 3.1, TabWorks
includes 3 year warranty (1 st year on -site)
.8 3CO- 3C509TP
3Com EtherLink III, 16-bit ISA (IOBase -T) Network
$118 $944
Interface Card, Parallel Tasking, UTP and Thick
8 CPQ - 143800 -50
Compaq SVGA Color Monitor, 14 ", Energy Saver
$337 $2
compliant
SubTotal
$16,728
Memory Upgrade 8 Machines (for RecWare) -- One machine to 20Mb (video photo station)
1 CPQ - 190747 -00
16MB SBAM (70ns) Memory for Compaq Enhanced
$1 $1
ProLinea, ProLinea, MT, ProSignia 486, VS, ProLiant
1000 (486)
8 CPQ - 141685 -00
8MB SDAM (70ns) Memory for Compaq Enhanced
$498 $3
ProLinea, ProLinea, MT, ProSignia 486, VS, ProLiant
1000 (486)
3 CPQ - 141684 -00
4MB SIMM (70ns) Memory for Compaq Enhanced
$253 $759
ProLinea, ProLinea, MT, ProSignia 486, VS, ProLiant
1000 (486)
9 A -SETUP
Setup equipment, test
$31 $279
SoTotal $6
- Continues -
City of Maplewood, Community Center
AmeriData
July 22, 1994
Page 3
Unit Extended
Item N o. o
Price
Nd work
Wiring Hub with Fiber Port for Community Center Network
1 SYN- 2814 -04 SynOptics LattisHub 2814 -04 managed lOBase -T
$2,032 $2,032
Workgroup Concentrator with l OBase -FL Inter -
connection port; includes license for Advanced IP
Network Management Agent
1 SYN -2803 SynOptics LattisHub 2803 lOBase -T Workgroup
$769 $769
Concentrator with l OBase -T interconnection port;
includes 988 10Base -T Workgroup Concentrator
Expansion cable
1 NOV- 006626440 Novell NetWare, v.3.12, CD ROM On -line
$1,973 $1,973
Documentation, upto 25 Users
SubTotal
$4,774
Implement/Install
1 A- MNFREIGHT Shipping
$75 $75
15 A IMPLEMENT On - site installation and configuration
$95 $1
SubTotal
$1500
Support
1 T -1072 Fundamentals for Novell System Management
$195 $195
1 T -1022 Novell NetWare 3.x
$716 $716
1 A- MNPRLN -SP Annual Novell & IBM PC Network Operating System
$500 $500
Telephone Support. Designed to assist designated LAN
Administrator (maximum of two designated contacts) with
problems on tasks such as operational questions, adding
and deleting users, performing tape backup procedures,
and help with printing functions on the LAN.
Prerequisites include a trained LAN Administrator and
approved hardware and software configuration. Calls wi�1
be returned within 90 minutes. Unlimited calls per contract period.
SubTotal $1
WordPerfect
1 WOR- U3USWW WordPerfect for Windows, v.6.0, Upgrade, Full $98 $98
Documentation
10 WOR- UOUSWW WordPerfect for Windows, v.6.0, Additional License $68 $680
Upgrade, no documentation or media
SubTotal $778
Community Center TOTAL $37,068
AGENDA NO. J 000 q
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager
RE: COMMUNITY CENTER'S COMPUTER SYSTEM
DATE: July 20, 1994
INTRODUCTION
A , OtJ.on by Council:
Endorsed.,.,„ .
Modifie
Rejected
Date
The Community Center's Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment (FF &E) budget has money
available for a computer system. The purpose of this report is to request City Council
approval of the purchase of the new computer hardware and software necessary for
operations.
BACKGROUND
At the May 23, 1994 meeting, the City Council authorized the staff to work with a
computer network design consultant, Ameridata. The consultant and the City's two
MIS Coordinators met with representatives from all City departments to determine their
computer needs and desires.
Asa result of the interviews with the departments and MIS, Ameridata has organized
a computer project for the City. It is split into two phases. Phase I is the Community
Center, and it involves having approximately 10 work stations connected together. It
is necessary for all users to have access to the recreation /registration information.
This would include program registration, facility scheduling, membership tracking, point
of sale,* and league scheduling. Since a four week lead time is required to order the
hardware, Council approval of Phase I is requested at this time. Phase 2 of the
project is the conversion of City Hall operations to a network. This network will
replace the current NCR minicomputer.
The computer system in City Hall is really two different systems; 53 personal
computers which have independent brains of their own, and the NCR minicomputer
which is used for budget, payroll, and utility billing. The proposed network would link
all of the pc's together for a more efficient and capable system. The advantages of
the network include:
High speed communications between people on the network (electronic mail)
* More efficient and daily back -up of data on the system
* Sharing of files and databases
* Sharing of printers
* Data security
* Data link between the Community Center and City Hall needed for financial
information, payroll, cash management, reservations, and registrations
* Remote communications between Public Works, Nature Center, Ramsey
County, etc.
* Base needed for a central filing system
More details about Phase 2 will be presented to the City Council at the August 1
Council /Manager meeting. This project will be funded out of the Data Processing
Fund Retained Earnings which have been set aside from the depreciation of the
current minicomputer and personal computers in use.
The hardware vendor is Ameridata, and their equipment was previously bid and
awarded the State contract.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the expenditure of an amount not to
exceed $48,524 for the purchase of the Community Center's computer system.
tmc
Attachment
2
�.
From: Todd Rawlings To: Elizabeth Weiland
Date: X119/94 Time: 1.8:23:50 Page 2 at 4
City of Maplewood
Community Centel.
July 19, 1994
- Continues -
Unit Extended
City It ein No.
Description
Pt•ice Price
Fflesei -ver
1 (.'FQ- 1481c:►ei_
C ompaq Deskpro XL 466, Model 535 /CDS, 486D X
$3,273 $3,273
Processor (Pentium upgradeable), 66MHz, 8h:B
Cache, 535MB Hard Drive (I (Ans), 1.44MB (3.5 ")
Floppy, CD -ROM, 8MB Memory, 32-bit Fast SCSI -
Controller, 32 -bit Ethernet Co ntroller, QVislo
Graphics Controller, ?MB VRAM, 5 Expansion Slots
(3 EISA, i FISA /P(. 1 PCD. ? Avai Drive Rays,
Serial, Parallel /Mouse parts, Compaq Vocalyst
Keyboard w /Speaker & Microphone, Audio Input/
(;output Connecters, MS -D()S 6. Windows 3.1.
TabWo Windows Sound System, Nov Universal
NetWare C. ient
includes 3 year warranty (1st year oil -site)
1 CPQ- 148193 -001
535MB Fast - SCSI -. Hard Drive for C ompaq
$673 $673
Deskpro .NL
l CP(: - SP -BMS
8MB Single- socket Memory Module for Compaq
$51 s $5 I ti
Deskpro /L, 486/25, Systempro, Enhanced System-
pro 486 /33
1 ( ~PQ -14380 0-501
Compaq SVGA Col M 14 ", Energy Saver
$337 $3 3 7
compliant
I AP(- 60(.')
American Power Conversion Smart Uninterruptible
$385 $3ti5
Power Supply (6(')OVA) for 386 and 486 File Servers,
5J) AMPS, requires NSP- PWR -M/AT which contains
both the cable and network management software.
1 NSP PWR -M1AT
American Power C onversion AT /M(- - 'A Powerchute
$89 $89
Software w /Cable., works w /Back & Stand UPS
1 A- MNSVC1 YR
First Year Can -site Warranty Service for a new ••ystem.
$35() $350
Covered equipment includes approved CPU/
Keyboard /Internals /Monitor.
Priority parts response within 4 hours.
1 .A- 5E'1'UI-'
Setup equipment, test
$31 $31
SubTotal SS,616
- Continues -
W
From: Todd Rawlings To: Elizabeth Weiland Date: x%19194 Time: 16:25 :10 Page 3 of 4
C ity of Maple wood, Community Center
AmeriData
July 19, 1994
Page
Memor y U race 10 Machines for RecWare -- One machipe to 32Mb video Photo Station
11 CPQ 190747 -0 16MB SHVIM (70ns) Memory for Compaq Enhanced $1,199 $13,189
ProLinea, ProLinea, MT, ProSignia 486, VS, ProLiant
10 A -SETUP Setup equipment, test $31 $310
SubTotal $13,=99
Wh-ine Hub with Fiber- Port tor- C 'oniniuni Center- Nehvor-k.
t snit
Extended
Q f Item No.
Description
Price
Price
Workgroup Concentrator with l OBase -FL biter -
Workstation
10 C -TQ -1 64656 -00
Compaq Enhanced ProLinea 4/66, Mo
$1
$16.361.1
Syn0ptics LattisHub 2 -S. 03 I OBase -T WorkiuNp
486D.X2 Processor (Pentium upgradeable). 66MHz.
$1.5 38
Concentrator with 1 )Base -T interconnection port-,
'2I0OIvIB Hard Drive (I 3.5ms), 1.44N-IB (3.5 ") Floppy,
includes 988 10Base -T Workgroup ( ~oncentrator
4M3 Memory, Local Bus Video Graphics Controller.
Expansion cable
1MB DRAM, 3 Expansion Slots, 1 Available Drive
Bay, ? Serial, Para I I el/IvIouse }worts, Keyboard, Mouse,
$3,570
Ir»pler�rer�t/Ir� stall
MS -DOS 6, Windows 3. 1, TahWorks
I A- NINFREIGHT
Shipping
includes 3 year warranty (Ist year ors -Mite)
$
?5 A -MILEM ENT
1(:) 3C0- 3C509TP
3t '.earn EtherLink III, 16 -bit ISA (I OBase -T) Network
$118
Interface (hard, Parallel Tasking, UTP and Thick
$2,450
10 (�PQ- l 4 3 8 0('_) -5()1
Compact SVGA Color Monitor, 14 ", Energy Saver
$337
$3,37(".
compliant
SubTotal
$20,910
Memor y U race 10 Machines for RecWare -- One machipe to 32Mb video Photo Station
11 CPQ 190747 -0 16MB SHVIM (70ns) Memory for Compaq Enhanced $1,199 $13,189
ProLinea, ProLinea, MT, ProSignia 486, VS, ProLiant
10 A -SETUP Setup equipment, test $31 $310
SubTotal $13,=99
Wh-ine Hub with Fiber- Port tor- C 'oniniuni Center- Nehvor-k.
1 SIN-2814-(N
Syn(: )ptics LattisHub 2814-(".)4 managed 10Base -T
$2.03'
Workgroup Concentrator with l OBase -FL biter -
connection port; includes license for Advanced. IF
Network Management Agent
? SIN -NO3
Syn0ptics LattisHub 2 -S. 03 I OBase -T WorkiuNp
$769
$1.5 38
Concentrator with 1 )Base -T interconnection port-,
includes 988 10Base -T Workgroup ( ~oncentrator
Expansion cable
SubTotal
$3,570
Ir»pler�rer�t/Ir� stall
I A- NINFREIGHT
Shipping
$71
$
?5 A -MILEM ENT
On -site installation and configuration
$9�
$�1375
SubTotal
$2,450
- Continues -
From: Todd Rawlings To: Elizabeth Weiland
City of Maplewood, Community Center
An1eriDa
July 19, 1994
Page 3
Shipping
Date: 7119194 Time: 16:26:33
Telephone Support. Designed to assist designated LAM
Administrator (maximum of two designated contacts) with
problems on tasks such as operational questions, adding
and d eleting users, performing tape backup procedures,
and help with printing fun* ctions on the LAN.
Prerequisites include a trained LAN Administrator and
approved hardware and software configuration. Calls will
be returned within 9(:) minutes. Unlimited calls per
contract period.
I A- MNFREIGHT
WordPet-fect
1 W( __')R -t_13 r_1S W"1 6(_.)
10 Vtir't;?R - I_TC►TJS V�rWF�i�
WordPerfect for W indows, v.6. Upgrade", Full
Documentation
Page 4 of 4
SubTotal $1,661
$9SI
WordPerfect for Windows, v,6.(:), Additional License $68 $t�ti�.i
Upgrade, no (Jocumentation or medkl
SubTotal $778
Community Center TOTAL $4$
X
Unit
Extended
Q t Itetit No.
Desct•i tiotl
Price
Price
S
1 T -1 07
Fundamentals for Navel I System Management
$195
$195
1 T -1 02
Novell Net Ware 3 . x
$716
$ 716
1 A- 1vIN`PRLN -SPT
Annual Novell &IBM PC Network Operating System
$5()()
$50(
Telephone Support. Designed to assist designated LAM
Administrator (maximum of two designated contacts) with
problems on tasks such as operational questions, adding
and d eleting users, performing tape backup procedures,
and help with printing fun* ctions on the LAN.
Prerequisites include a trained LAN Administrator and
approved hardware and software configuration. Calls will
be returned within 9(:) minutes. Unlimited calls per
contract period.
I A- MNFREIGHT
WordPet-fect
1 W( __')R -t_13 r_1S W"1 6(_.)
10 Vtir't;?R - I_TC►TJS V�rWF�i�
WordPerfect for W indows, v.6. Upgrade", Full
Documentation
Page 4 of 4
SubTotal $1,661
$9SI
WordPerfect for Windows, v,6.(:), Additional License $68 $t�ti�.i
Upgrade, no (Jocumentation or medkl
SubTotal $778
Community Center TOTAL $4$
X