The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1995 12-11 City Council PacketTHURSDAY, DECEMBER 7: 4:30 - 5:00 P.M. -PRE - AGENDA 5:00 HRC APPLICANTS AGENDA MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 11, 1995 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 95 -27 A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. ROLL CALL D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Minutes of Meeting 95 -25, (November 27, 1995) E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA EA. PRESENTATIONS F. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item wi l l be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. TH61 -Beam Avenue, Signal Agreement 3. Searle Street Storm Sewer - Project 93 -14, Budget Adjustment and Close Project 4. East Shore Drive Storm Sewer - Project 94 -06, Budget Adjustment and Close Project 5. Community Center: Final Payment to Adolphson & Peterson; Release of Surety Bond 6. Contingency Request - Maplewood In Motion 7. Final Plat - Mapleleaf Estates, Second Addition - (Gonyea Co.) 8. Certification of Delinquent False Alarm Bills 9. Community Gymnasium Representatives Positions for Edgerton and Carver Elementary G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M.: Street and Easement Vacations - Mapleleaf Estates (Gonyea Company) 2. 7:10 P.M.: Conditional Use Permit - 113 Bellwood Avenue (Osterman) 3. 7:20 P.M.: Open Space Site 168C - 2413 Carver Avenue (Grandview Addition) Land Use Plan Change (R -1 to OS) Preliminary Plat Authorize Purchase of Property, 4. 7:40 P.M.: Holiday Station Store (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) Land Use Plan Change (CO to BC) Zoning Map Change (CO to BC) Code Change (Minor Motor Fuel Stations) Conditional Use Permit H. AWARD OF BIDS I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Conditional Use Permit and Design Review - AT &T (1840 English Street) 2. Antenna and Tower Moratorium 3. Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance Revision - 2nd Reading 4. Gambling Ordinance Revision - 2nd Reading J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Driveway Ordinance K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. 3. N. ADJOURNMENT MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 27, 1995 Council Chambers, Municipal Building Meeting No. 95 -25 A.. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Acting Mayor Carlson. B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C ROLL CALL: Gary.W. Bastian, Mayor Absent Dale H. Carlson, Acting Mayor Present Sherry Allenspach, Councilmember Present Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Absent George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. Minutes of Meeting 95 -23, (November 9, 1995) Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the , minutes of Meeting No. 95-23 (November 9, 1995) as presented. Seconded by Acting Mayor Carlson Ayes - Acting Mayor Carlson, Councilmember Rossbach Abstain - Councilmembers Allenspach 2. Minutes of Meeting 95 -24, (November 13, 1995) Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve the minutes of Meetinq No. 95 -24 (November 13, 1995) as corrected: Page 19, Item L -la: "Councilmember Rossbach stated ....." Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Acting Mayor Carlson moved to.a_pprove the Agenda as amended. L -1 Open Space Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all EA. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS NONE 1 11 -27 -95 F. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilmember Rossbach moved, se_ conded aDDrove the Consent.AQenda Items F -1 16 Approval of Claims Approved the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 218 $ 79 $ 72 „106.788.59 $ 477 PAYROLL: $ 264 48 ,118.46 $ 312,647.43 $ 7909170.10 ouncilmember Allenspach: ayes - all, to F -4 as recommended. Checks #5894 - #5914 Dated 11 2 -95 thru 11- 7 =95 Checks #5915 - #5926 Dated 11- 9 -95 thru 11 -15 -95 Checks #22503 - #22615 Dated 11 -14 -95 Checks #22624 #22709 Dated 11 -21 -95 Total Accounts Payable Payroll Checks Dated 11 -17 -95 Payroll Deduction Checks #49080 thru #49091 dated 11 -17 -95 Total Payroll GRAND TOTAL 20 Land Use Plan Change Reconsideration - Maplewood Town Houses (Shelter Corporation, 11th Avenue) Reconsider the land use plan classification for the northwest corner of Eleventh Avenue and Ariel Street in six months if the applicant has not gotten a building permit. 3. Transfer To Close Debt Service Fund For 1973 Bonds Authorized closing the Debt Service Fund for the 1973 Improvement Bonds by a transfer of the remaining balance to the Capital Improvement Projects (C.I.P.) Fund effective November 30, 1995 and making the appropriate budget adjustments. 4. 1995 -96 Pay Rates for Temporary and Part -Time Employees (Non - Union) Adopted the following Resolution: 95 - 11 - 127 SETTING 1995 -96 PAY RATES FOR TEMPORARY AND PART -TIME EMPLOYEES (NON- UNION) WHEREAS, according to the Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, part -time employees who do not work more than .14 hours per week and temporary/ seasonal employees who work in positions that do not exceed 67 days in a calendar year are not public employees and are therefore not eligible for membership in a public employee union. 2 11 -27 -91: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the followi pay ranges and job cl aSsi fi cations are hereby established. for temporary /seasonal and part ( 14 hours or l ess) employees. effective November 27, 1995, upon Council approval: Accountant $ 8.00 -14.00 per hour Accounting Techni $ 6.50 -12.00 per hour Administrative Ass istant $ 9.00 -20.00 per hour Building Maintenance Assistant /Attendant $ 5.50- 8.50 per hour Clerk- Typist $ 7.50 -10.50 per hour Custodian Maintenance Worker $ 8.00 -10.50 per hour Customer Service Assistant $ 6.00- 8.00 per hour Election Judge $ 6.00- 6.50 per.hour Election Preci Chair $ 6.25- 6.75 per hour Engi neer ing' Aide .$ 7.00 -10.00 per hour Engineering Technician $10.00 -16.00 per hour Inspector $14.00 -19.00 per hour Intern $ 6.00 -14.00 per hour Laborer $ 6.50 -.9.00 per hour Lifeguard $ 6.00 -10.00 per hour Park Maintenance Assistant $ 6.00- 9.00 per hour Receptionist $ 7.50 - .10.50 per hour Recreation Instructor /Leader $ 5.00 -30.00 per hour Recreation Official $ 5.00 -20.00 per game Rink Attendant $ 5.00- 7.00 per hour Secretary $ 8.50 -15.50 per hour Video Coordinator $ 9.00- 13.00 per hour Video Technician $ 8.50 -12.00 pe hour Water Safety Instructor (WSI) $ 6.00- 8.00 per hour WSI & Head Lifeguard Differential $1.00 per hour (Lifeguards or WSIs Working as Head Lifeguards; Lifeguards working as WSIs) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager shall have the authority to set the pay rate within the above ranges. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. 7:00 P.M. (7:05 P.M.): Conditional Use Permit, AT &T, 1890 English Street a. Acting Mayor Carlson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a request for a conditional use permit to erect a 150 -foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1840 English Street. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Commissioner Dave Kopesky presented the Planning Commission report. e. Boardmember Vidyashankar presented the Community Design Review Board report. f. City Attorney Kelly explained the procedure for public hearings. 3 11 -27 -9� g. Acting Mayor Carlson opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents., The following persons were,heard: Peter Beck, representing AT &T Ted Olson, Property Manager, AT &T Radio Frequency Engineer (Tim), AT &T David Bartol, 1249 Frisbie, owner of English Manor Apartments Tom Mathison, 1843 Clarence Street Joseph Born., 1830 English Street Mike Braderich, 1257 Frisbie Carl Grill, 1280 Frisbie Peter Beck, AT &T David Bartol, 1249 Frisbie Ii. Acting Mayor Carlson closed the public hearing. i . Councilmember Al lenspach moved to table this iter ,until the meeting of December 11, 1995 to hold di scussi,on .with a ful 1 Council. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 2. 7 :15 P.M. (8:45 P.M.): Antenna Tower Moratorium a. Acting Mayor Carlson convened the meeting for a public hearing regarding a proposed temporary moratorium on antennas, towers or any other transmitting /receiving equipment. b. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. c.. Director of Community Development Coleman presented the specifics of the report. d. Acting Mayor Carlson opened the public hearing, calling for proponents or opponents. The following person was heard: Chris Miles, 1280 Frisbie, in favor of moratorium e. Acting Mayor Carlson closed the public hearing. f. Acting Mayor Carlson moved to table this item until the December 11, 1995 meeting Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all H. AWARD OF BIDS NONE I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NONE. 4 11 -27 -91 J.. NEW BUSINESS 1. Temporary Beer and Food Licenses for Non - Profit organizations a Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b Assistant Manager Dawson P resented the specifics of the report, c. Acting Mayor.Ca.rlson asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard Ted Bearth, Maplewood Oakdale Lions d. Counci Imember Rossbach moved to combine ^ thi s i tem wi th the 1 i quor study . e. Councilmember Allens P ach moved to reduce the fee for non -rofit organizations to $10.00 for each item per event. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND f. Council will take under advisement. NO ACTION TAKEN 2. Feasibility Study - TH61 North of Beam Avenue, Watermain Project 95 -17 a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Acting Mayor Carlson asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard: John Dittrich, RLK Associates, Ltd. d. Acting Mayor Carlson introduced the,foll.owing_Resolution and moved its adoption 95 - 11 - 128 ACCEPTING REPORT AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the City Engineer for the City of Maplewood has been authorized and directed to prepare a report with reference to the improvement of TH 61 North of Beam Avenue Water Main, City Project 95 -17, by construction of water main and appurtenances, and WHEREAS, the said City Engineer has prepared the aforesaid report for the improvement herein described: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, as follows: 1. The report of the City Engineer advising this Council that the proposed improvement on TH 61 North of Beam. Avenue Water Main, City P P Project - 95 -17, by construction of water main and appurtenances is feasible and should best be made as proposed, is hereby received. 5 11 -27 -95 2. The Council will consider the aforesaid improvement in accordance with the reports ne its and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement according to MSA Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $134,019.60 3. A public hearing w.i11 be held in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1830 East County Road B on Monday, the 8th day of January, 1996, at 7 p.m. to consider said improvement. The City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvement as required by law. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 3. Road Jurisdiction Transfer, Linwood Avenue a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Acting Manager Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: 95 - 11 - 129 ROAD JURISDICTION TRANSFER RESOLUTION - LINWOOD AVENUE WHEREAS, the 1991 Minnesota Legislature established a Ramsey County Local Government Services Study Commission to "report on the advantages and disadvantages of sharing, cooperating, restructuring, or consolidating..." activities in areas of public service including public works; and WHEREAS, the consolidation plan provides for reclassification of roadways and corresponding changes in jurisdiction including the transfer of local and State Aid roadways between the County and municipalities; and WHEREAS, Linwood Avenue (County Road 123) from McKnight Road to Century Avenue, located in the City of Maplewood, is presently under the jurisdiction of Ramsey County as a County Road; and WHEREAS, this roadway has been determined to serve a local function onl y and WHEREAS, revocation of "County Road" status may be accomplished by resolution of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §163.11; and WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has concurred that jurisdiction should be changed from Ramsey County to the City of Maplewood; and WHEREAS, the consolidation plan stipulates that Ramsey County shall improve the roadways to acceptable levels prior to transferring jurisdiction over roadway segments from Ramsey County to and the Ramsey County Capital Improvement Program provides funding for these improvements; and 6 11 -27 -9r WHEREAS, the.City of Maplewood desires Ramsey County to recycle and overlay Linwood Avenue from McKnight Road to Century Avenue for an estimated .cost of $1509000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Maplewood does concur with Ramsey County revoking the "County Road" status of Linwood Avenue between McKnight Road and Century Avenue and tralnsferring jurisdictilon over the roadway to the City of Maplewood, effective the first day of the first month .after the following conditions are met: • the recycle and overlay of Linwood Avenue has been completed, • the Ramsey County Office of Budgeting and Accounting has encumbered the funds necessary to fund the recycle and overlay project, and the County is in receipt of an adopted resolution from the City of Maplewood concurring with the County revoking the "County Road" status of Linwood Avenue from McKnight Road to Century Avenue, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Maplewood Engineer is authorized within the limits of this Resolution to take actions necessary to have the identified jurisdiction changes executed. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 4. McKnight Road Trail Snow Removal Petition a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report. c. Cindy Hofineister, the applicant, presented the petition requesting snow removal. d. Acting Mayor Carlson moved to remove snow from the , Maplewood ^ portion of the McKnight Road Trail on a trial basis for one Year. Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all 5. Alcoholic Beverage Ordinance (1st Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Public Safety presented the specifics of the report. c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve first reading of an Ordinance amendinq the Alcoholic Beveraqe Ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 7 11 -27 -9 n 6. Gambling Ordinance Ust Reading) a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Publ is . Safety Col l ins presented the speci f cs of the report. c Councilmember Rossbach moved to approve. first reading of. an Ordinance amending thel.Gambling,and Bingo ordinance. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all 7. Master Plans - Edgerton and Carver Community Center Properties a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report. b. Director of Parks & Recreation presented the specifics of the report. c. Acting Mayor Carlson asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council regarding this matter. The following was heard Peter Fischer, Parks & Recreation Commission d. Councilmember Rossbach moved.to develop a request for prop( a landscape ^ architect firm to develop master plans for Carver community center properties. Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes all K. 'VISITOR PRESENTATIONS NONE L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Open Space a. Councilmember Rossbach stated he was wondering about how the City should proceed with the acquisition of Open Space. b. Staff stated that after the acquisition that will appear before the Council in December, there will be very little open space funds left. M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS NONE N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING 9 :45 P.M. Lucille E. Aurelius, City Clerk 8 11 -27 -9F AGENDA NO. F -1 AGENDA REPORT To: City Manager FROM: Finance Director ��-- RE: APPROVAL OF CLAIMS DATE: December 4, 1995 It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims: ACCOUNTS PAYAB ,F. $218,148.12 Checks # 5927 thru #5956 dated 11 -16 -95 thru 11 -30 -95 $419 Checks #22716 thru #22875 dated 11 -28 -95 and 12 -05 -95 $637,603.72 Total Accounts Payable PAYROLL $262,934.46 Payroll Checks dated 12 -1 -95 $48,162.68 Payroll Deduction check #49313 thru #49325 dated 12 -1 -95 $311,097.14 Total Payroll $94 8,700.86 GRAND TOTAL Attached is a detailed listing of these claims. rb Attachments C: \WPWIN60\AGENDA\APPR4.DEC CAWPWIN60\AGENDA\APPR4.DEC VOUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 1 7-1 11/295 -)7:49 C VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER F ERTOD- L -- ---- ---- 31 VOUCHER/ 1 4 NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 61 %94140- 0- TREASURE-R -STATE ___DR_1_ VER'S- __L 1C-____FEE-S_PAYABLE_ 5928 11/16/95 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE 13 13, ,432-30 pill 5929 11/17/95 722200 P■E.R.A■ PERA PAY 12g854■96 14 PERA CONTRIB 16q237.39 n C 4- 09-2. 3 5 15i 1 5930 11/17/95 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES DNR LIC FEES PAY .4.226. 00 --'-2 6 . 00 1 lai i 5414 0 4.02 r 00 __`3*2 59* 11/17/95 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER MTR VEH LIC PAY 9�,774.25 9 1: 5933 1.1/20/95 66*92251 NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA FICA PAY 13 FED INC TAX PAY 284297.24 R. -1:3-11- 1 7:7-.--.*--*Z. Z. 254----647 -a-6S-'- 5934 11/20/95 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER mTR VEH L C PAY ._8 13 n 089. E34 5935 11/20/95 541400 MINN. STATE TREASURER ST DRV LIC FEE 493.50 493.5(--) 9,50 -5,n_----M--BENEF if 59387 11/20/95 943500 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF- REVENUE ST INC TAX PAY 5 4'2) . 96 542.96 2271.6 11/28/95 WRIGHT, CINDY PROGRAM FEES 24.00 24. 00 0 -i 0 BISE, RICK PROGRAM FEES 5.20 5 . '2- 0 22719 11/28/95 JOHNSON, COLLEEN PROGRAM FEES 10. 00 1c) . o ci) -2-'z"-"-720*---I-I-IZE37/9-0,i------al--04-66-----A T TELEPHONE 5.46 1 1 L EPHONE 5. 30 .22 16. 2 .22 721 11/28/95 01("-)470 A T & T WIRELESS SERVICES CELL PHONE USE 2 ^' . 4'X." CELL PHONE USE 107.52 i6o Ir `'x 11/28/95 C.)10472 AAA ALL C I TY VACUUM REPAIR (IF VAC*UUM 177.99 .1.77.99 2 `2 7 2 3 11/28/95 02110() AMERICAN AUTO TRIM REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLE 95.98 95.98 '��> it'll -2- 200--------AMER 1 CAN :57' is 2'2_1 7 12- 5 11/28�/915 C_ '21 5 A R I C PA N LINEN SUPPL.-Y FEES FOR SERVICE 7 7' 7. 7' , oil 2` T26 11 /'128 9 5 (".)21700 AMOCO OIL COMPANY FUEL_ 16) a 66 16. 6 c, V( U0 X.. -4RE2 CITY OF �, ( C) 7:4 9 1 REG I ` ,1 FOR PERIOD' VOUCHER/ NUMBER NAM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT NUMBER DATE 1 i lid 22728 11 /2 8 /95 040915 ARNALS AUTO SERVICE REPAIR & MA INT VEH 37.01 I I .,:« •,:•• 7 2 9 11/ 041415 ASIAN GANG INVESTIGAT ASSN TRAVEL. T 65 65.0 `27 3 0 11/28/95 050350 ALJRE1_ I US. LUC I LLE TRAVEL & TRAI 28 ( I. PROGRAM 8t..1PF'1....IE8 3 . 40 • f _�._.. 1 p .L« '.} •1 ' Iy'' 11 1 '2127 3 11 /.28/95 060090 BCA /FQF ENS I C SCIENCE LAB TRAVEL & TRAIN 40.00 'TRAVEL & TRAI 40 I, 0 26 1 T { TF�,A I N I NG _ 4 p t 0 `"$2 .i .. .i ..! •... i« 2,}••.�S 5 ��r l .l:.. l..l /��.. L � ,t1 / � • . • ��/ , 06 �J. £ «W T �. • . • {� M E�{ • , • �� 7�.•.•r�t i«'�u F«..It BUILT SUP PL ' L.. I ES -« VEHICLE «1..1.0 a E30 110.80 I 1 2733 11/28/95 071100 BEBWALD ROOFING CO. REPAIRS & M I ANT 60.00 60 p 00 J .1 j {; „•, 22 a w � S � .... _. _ I� 1 1 T ti � L r� 1 1 a Fes F �`FV ��::E--- .____.....__. -__. _ _ -_._ -_ .__.-_-_-------._. _____.-- .____.__._-- » .. � _�.__._.__. 4 _.._ __.--- __.__.- � w -- 3! 1 36 --' ,�, -- - --- t« w _ L, 22 735 5 I.1 /.28/95 101; 50 EAU I LDERS SQUARE MA I NT MATL 37 p 05 37 w r� 5 227 11/28/95 150175 COLLINS ELECT CONST w CO. WIRING AND ELECTRIC 693.86 693.86 ;I i. 2 r, .t... 7* r ! .4.. 1.1/28795 . ...._. _ 1 0C `2!{ L..I � �.«.� .L �� f •. 1.... ��•i f.... f , � it M REFRESH TRV TRN 26 p 40 126 a 40 N n _ � r2 738 - ._ i r�9� - -_ - --- - '-1 6 ~ - CR�s� - - BuT�.�z �n « r, '6 2 *739 11/28/95 170230 CUSTOM AUTO RADIO & TAPE REPAIR & MA I NT RADIO 50.90 5� li t I I ttj;1 / '2 x'40 1.1/28/95 �. 706r« 0 D p A w F, a E w AMERICA PROGRAM 8UF'F'1._ I ES 3. 1 930 . 75 _ 3 , 930 a 75 tjfj( Sr{ ::•_'.x` 741 1.1 / 2 8/ 95 180970 DADDY MAGI SERVICE R I E & MA I NT /UTILITY _ 391 w c_ 0 391. 8 1 59 -, 4 11 / �.� _ - -- C� a trc r cr s » COc x;�� ILTI NG- Id r .::..,:« '43 11/28/ .,:_6045( - -) FEED- R I TE CONTROLS I NC. CHEM I CALS 449 449.7o 1 1 I 6 2 22 44 1. 1/ 28 /95 300 G & k:: SERVICES U CLOTHI 117.55 65 s' r,! U( I FORMS & CLOTHING 128 245 • ' ,. ,.. /4 5 , ; C .. 1..r1. / .. J - 7 �.� » r ,» -'.r h .«�t«j.,:._ . »�r G r / t L , BOD S HOP REP , ! C . ; ••, RUS TY 1 CA1 s ,.. -4 1 ♦ .4..S_ a , «�r «f ,.. .1:.-.00 p 00 7 0 I 1 � .i ..r:5 1, - - -- . _ ,. _ , 746 �, 8/ � 5 11 /.2 r _ - _._ _ �� 9 5 -- . _ rr.� r r. -- u x ' � T . c _ ,. �.rr- �� I u r� nrT - .._ ___ - - - -- - -__ ._._ _. - _�; — ..; p . - _._ _. - - -- _--- - - -' -- -- - -- - - - - -- - -_ 7 3 8UPPL I E8 -- EOU I F'MENT 864 17.1 , [ ::CALEB TAX PBL.. w OUT OF STATE 9'�'`w VOUCHRE2_ CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE Z j! 11/27/95 07: A.9 VOLJ(-*.'Fil--.[R/('.1-i.l=-(--,K REGISTER PER'I'OD '11. VOUCHER/ I'TEM_ - ---- -- j: NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 161 ---------- I PMENT--'-- W-92- EQUIPMENT 113.61 SALES TAX PBL. OUT OF STATE 113.61-- 10 ��J. t ,��T�_...__....__- _.�....�. I 41.J p�� .- _ «._- .__._- _._. -.__. .t:.. , _ - t ! •... p t.JW ____ -__._. _. � 14. 2 `2747 11/28/95 320281 GRANDMA'S BAKERY, INC. PROGRAM SUPPL I ES 15.75 1 1 6 PROGRAM'_SUPP1_I ES'- '- PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12.75 P f R 0 G R A M S L J PP I... I LF -_- c,-,-,, 4. 50 ------------ PROGRAM SUPPLIES 122. 75 iizi PROGRAM SUPPLIES 12.75 ISUPPI I ES PROGRAM SUPPLIES 122 w 75 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 13.75 - ----------- ----1-75-6- 0 2`2748 11/28/95 "120600 GRUENHAGEN, LINDA FEES FOR SERVICE 58.50 58. 50 22749 11/28/95 330650 HEALTH PARTNERS A/R AMB BILLS 486.30 4 271 ..:_ 5 22751. 11/28/95 351600 HOULE q DENISE FEES FOR SERVICE 58.50 58.50 Ad 'i ;,i2l 22752 11/28/95 4 016'220 JOHNSON., KEVIN ARTHUR TRAVEL TRAIN 159.95 159.95' 27 917.. 22754 11/28/95 4 3092.i_] KRAEMER, JILL FEES FOR SERVICE 57.50 57.50 ... 22755 11/28/95 450125 L.E.T.N. TRAINING 519.72 519.72 _4459-21 RE--F;IAI-R --- EQtJ-IP----- -135 U-70" d x_^7' 57 11/28/95 460450 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE CLAIM 51 0 5 10. 2 22758 11/28/95 490500 LUNDSTEN., LANCE TRAVEL & TRAIN 8. 50 8. 50 i 4ul oi l PLAN CHECK SURTAX 43.75 75 .3. . 1 5w 22760 11/28/95 501650 MAJKOZAK%,, MICHELLE F E E S) F 0R SERVICE 54. 00 54.00 -- -- -------- 227-61 1 1/-28/95- - 501700 ------ --- MANK-ATO- MOB I LE----RAa1 -NC 1REPA I R- MA I-NT RAD 10 28- 34 '. ,_; 7 e 2 11/8/95 5-T 1 660 1v1EFR(.'f-(.A...I TAN COUNCIL SAC F" AYABLE -17 8- 5 0 . (2) C FIZE': -T A I N E R f' . 5 0 3 A. 7 1. 5 0 -:8 • /'�28 9 5 54()400 M I KES LP A S 1* R V I C CENTER MAIN T MATI.-.. 16. 1A. 4:IOUC1 OF MA F''L_.L:r�� OC�r.� F-�A��E 4 i I .�... I t t.. 1. � `�l % f •? 5 (- 49 f f �V' !UCVlE1 i f � +1 (..J IJ ii :� � 1 s.k r i.. I - ,, +' i VOUCHER/ C.JI IE..CIr: CHECK VEND OR EN DO R x T� I� __ .._...._ _._- .._._, - -.__. __ __...__ . _.__ ..__.� _.. - .__ - fi {% + .. INJt..IM BE I) Nt..JMBI=- R N AM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT -1 F 3 i tl 3 i li iT�. - -- - -- - --- - - - -- - -- ..._...- - -- - ---- - . 2*764 11/28/95 540750 MINNEAPOLIS T COLLEGE TRAVEL & TRAINING 35 a 00 TRA 9f. T I N' I . `�. .. I " i"tA VEL._ R? TRA I N I NG 35 - 0 0 TRA & T I"� A I I`.I .[ I �I C� �; 5 a c_ 0 y 140 2765 11/28/95 62 06 00 MUSKA LIGHTING CENTER SUPPLIES 468.77 SUPPLIES EQUIP 415 884 6 .2766 1.1/2 ! 95 630. 6c.} NATUrte:AL. L._ANX18 TRUST BOO K: - O 2 5 . 00 .L'_`5 I j <' I J�► 7 . _. ___ -/ / 5 - - -._.. _ 4 _. ,'` -_- tEt CJrt v -•� ---- -- -- - -- - -- -- -- - - *�T Ct `- -ALt -O*W- - - -- - -- - -- - -- _ - 7 : - _ -M_- - - -_ 1 { . „. 84--- _ 22 '768 11 5 65 NOBLE , ROBE FRT G . FEES FOR SERVICE 775 775 2 :69 1 6608c_ }r ) NOF TF -I 8-r. PAUL CITY Off' UT I I._ I T I E 1, 604 16 I "` UTILITIES 386.44 l..�T t .M -._-- -- .I:.. a 2 .G.. Il w 4J t 22770 11/28/95 661175 NORTHERN A CORD REPAIRS & IAA I NT 322. 322 50 _r '.'22''71 1.1/28/95 661750 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 4.72 i: j U 87 T I -E - 54- UTILITIES 83 .93 UTILITIES 124 IT.1 T. ;3`i U °r"IL »-ITIES 133,0 ' i,16 UTILITIES 126.02 UTILITIES 7.21 UTILITIES 114.71 UTILITIES 155 u rII....ITI I: « 8 154 _ .4 I i ;4 UTILITIES 63.56 I , (..lTIL...ITI 54 . 44 TTES i IJTIL_.ITIES 739.66 � <! UTII_ITIES 4 99 03 a ea1 ra, .__ ------- _- _______._ •� TI I LI �r 5 A.�! a •« ' UTI t•1 I._ITIE8 �� 8(�y �J w�? «, 7 5 ! q (f'�I , �f;1il 671 I Looi(i _ 12'`7 ' - 1 - 1. / P/9 5 661 - 1 \10 fit t fE ST , - � 1EEIr-1 , . 2a' 1.1 / `228 /' 9 5 68115 -} OF= F I CEMA X INC CAI' VA BRIEFCASE 63 6,2 w 88 '.,' J J 4 I L /t�:'�7 /9 "� 7r�} _ }(. 7.`� I- 'AI~•.1,Y , t»lEitiiE F� EE8 F[.)i'i BEF =��1 I rC «. �� , . 580.61 !�i OUCHRE2 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 5 11/27/95 07:49 VOUCHER/CFiE(_.*.*K . REG I STER - ----- ..... .... j:70R_'_'PERI_OD J.1-" I VOUCHER/ 13 NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT Jill HEAT'I NG_'____'_'_'__ -5581-Ya 1 �j 9 22775 11/28/95 701400 PARTY TIME LIQUOR PROGRAM SUPPLIES 110.65 -2-5- PROGRAM SUPPL I ES 21.25 �� . ..... PROGRAM SUPPL.. I ES 12.75 ----- ----- - -497 7 SUP`P- LTES---_ of 2.9-776 11/28/95 712100 PITNEY BOWES INC. REPAIR & MAINT EQUIP 28.50 28.50 + 22777 11/28/95 712109 PLACHESKI. MELISSA FEES FOR SERVICE 18.75 -& --MAI REPAIR & MAINT VEH 76.11 96.75 P GSTA G E 70 C f _._6 0 __ _ �..•� ------ 7C. yC_ y : b ��, - - -- -_ f# 231 I � 2,11 rs:.027eO 11/28/95 '740160 R. B. WH I TACRE 8., CO I NC SMALL TOOLS 222.00 . I ES'- -;-' 'EOUT P- 22781 11/28/95 741331 RAMSEY COUNTY FEES FOR SERVICE 39. 00 9 . 0c) 22782 11/28/95 7 8 0 `5 0 0 S&T OFFICE PRODUCTS INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE 52. 04 PROGRAM SUPPL I ES 13.10 3""! OFF-I-CE _76UPPLI ES-"'--- SUPI-LIES OFFICE 82.24 239.76 -2-2783--li/ St__HRS 1 0 �:a 3[, 22784 11/228/95 E300515 SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF FLORIDA MAINT MATL 414.92 4 . 92' 'I r I 1.3;31 o1i 292785 11/28/95 820600 SNAP--ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS 62.99 622.99. t i I I ,:'x7 7t36--- --rr/-227�7' 8:315 5 ---SP=AL I r-TZAlD i 0 S E R V E37-.- =57. 0 2 11 / 9,» 840405 ST. PAUL. CITY OF TRAVEL & TRAINING 400.00 4(__)0. 00 1 :13i 1 0 ! 22788 11/28/95 E343575 STREICHER'S PROF. POLICE EQUIP ........ .. SUPPLIES 25.69 )sd SOPP I IfIe s 99.45 0 ,016.14 22789 11/28/95 850340 SUMMIT INSPECTION SERVICES LTD INSPECTION DFD REVENUE 2,015.20 '42 5 19. o C) E1-_-.1_=CTRTCPERM-IT-- -2- 519'-. 0- 0- 01 ,...r , ,: _. 1 i 22790 11/28/95 850395 SUNRAY AUTO PARTS SUPPLIES-VEH 43.45 43.45 22791 11/2e/95 861. 66 1"HE. K I PL I LAGER WASH I NGTON LETTE SUBSCRIPTIONS A-8. 00 48. () : 1 i 2275t2 11/28/95 -061668- H'I-LTON SOUTH MOUNT._._.. -. TRAVEL & TRAINING 1 -"-1. 1.. 0 0 3 1. . 00 2 79 11 /28/95 86 TICKET CRAFT FEES FOR SERVIC17 18 73- . 4 5 183.45 ____,.._ -. _.__ __�..�- __� - - -_ ..__.�.._.__�__.._.- .� -___. ... - _- .____.L .___�. � ' -•:'_. .... • ....+. -Y ,.�. ., r..ry .:try: -.-. t . ..:.,M.ts.M J^i..« _,. - - -.._ __ _"__ t___'. _ -.__- ._ -__._. ... -... `_ 1 r. - i � .. .t+nn . nw . r . rve..�- .. _. .r�... -.. . ,e[}t# °1^ i T"`a' ...: 'T.!,_.� _- ______._.__- - ��._____._- �� _. -_ ^l wnR . r•nwa ! r: •a...l._ Jv.- .?.'M.F? acv.. ktAW°.l1�M191P - '.o'r .`Tr'mF•�F4MeH°rtn"`.°" I 2 C I TY car - ::• MAF rLEWOOD PAGE 6 f . . 1 1 / :'..:' . 5 C-) f o 4 V 0UC HE C H E C V' ! -A 1 : � FOR E'E:R I O D1 I: J. i .. i VOt..J -l! ��R CHECK Cl- E.C1'.. {`: {VEER DATE NUMBER : i A E DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AMOUNT 22 794 SR0 20 _ - IFIF...- FC:1F:LS- -. _..__. U nleag - e - ig" s nea e as _. 09, 6.17 10 ' ' 9 �" t I .. yr .u:..,::.: �� -� ....._.... 1.1 . .. ..._....._.... 8-8 ..! Y-. _._ ; C . L . r _ �._._.....- _._..... .. TF•�LU� C;E•!•EC'� I C;�l... I .:IL.�TF' T E`L»k .. � ! I - �•'. _...... ----- ...-- -......_--- -.._... -- --.._....._.___ .. � • S L.. P r L... 4 E S .. ...... .....- -- ----_..._. ._........_.._.__..._.--- -----. _. ....- -- - -- -•_ _ ....---•- ..:r•.:.I .._.._._..._�.--•----- ...... _ .......�•...r..__._._._. •��' w mr..:s �i 6 11/28/95 880850 TRUGREF N - ••MAPLEWOOD FEES S FOR SERVICE 8"' w 0 1 .A:.' 7t 7 11. /'C28 /95 88oeeo T8C;H I DA BRCIS PLUMBING REFUND HTC PERMIT 25 00 25 N 00 I• 8... /�...�{ _ !!}} t-� {} ."i _. -.... ...._.. .�..��..�.1�^ - •-._..�_ .. • .. .. --- }-�{�-}� - }°!'{''� /!'!y{�r�{!!► •} � �•--• -'{ .fir. '� 111�i { lf la�}� l l� l J 1 FAr` ._.... -- -- _._.._._� _.._._ .... ... r i'� +j-•- � 1 Y � i�� i � L »J �... _ a..I T� i t✓ ...._... _.._ ............._.. _.. _ ____ __.._._._- �_.-- ..- ._........... _._.....,.___ � 4 N �' ___ _. _ - -- - C - - -- -... - - -- - �; • j •" I c;t_ PF::'L... I ES EQ 1 5.09 .,,.. 13 Iz - .1'.x..799 _ 11/.,:.819 - ax_xr I �` ._ - -__ �:� t 1 i��:� f� tl Fa - - �'f 7NA – C4I....L-S ._- -. —. — ____— I'} j __ —__� _ - -..47-.-77*--- BUSINESS C<ALS8 176.51. 224.28 11/.,:.'8/95 90082 _ t�1`+fi��f =i�� T�'� -�F ._ -. � TRAVEl &J - TRA I N -1N -- - -.__- I I 1. 11/28/95 r�i r�ti 8 � ` 8 U N I V E R S I T Y CI M I N K E: CI » I» A T RAV EL & T R AI N I NG q c�� w 00 4 � .r: 8 0 .r::, 11/ 2- 8/ 95 9 W E D ES , CARYI.... FEES FO SERVICE 5 4 . 00 5 w t ..0 1. V1 1 TOTAL_ CL °lE:CKS 245,e78 ?3 ,:. , '. ,61 G3i � j"L1 1 -i V 0U l.. Cr .i. » I • • f 0F 11 A P L.... EWO {"-iA.GL» i; 0 1. / 9 5 8 a 1 V O U [ »r 1 { I I i C I - » I I .- lwr 4 1 EE M J 1 E IR I� -- -- _ -.. _. __ __- , w t , _ _ . FOR P ER I OD 1..E I -I T �:r -1 _. _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ . __ .. _ - -__ _ _ ._ _ __ _ _ I TEr-1 --__.. _ -._ __ -___ .._ _ _ __ . rHEcI: ?_ . I �. I I 14I I.. 1 1 :)r� "I "I� NU MBER NA ME DI � :�C F % I I °' »C 1 t� 4`�I �ir'1�"ltwJI��wIw pl) M CjLJN••Iw � C ! /2-1 1 :�: ��j _ - ��r��s�� } � j tp� � E } � q � N W °r ��r�11�1 � t��t`T �: )r�� 570 7 57 »I.. I .. L... EM I•w' I•w O N E: 57 . 39 i 5 7 -. .. .... _. 'I "E.1w.E4w' 5? N 3`? k "I" E::: Lw. E F= 't-ILJ r l k. 5 7 N .m, 9 TELEPHONE - 7 :. - I ». L. E . I�' 4� ! t »j I� 1 E ». 5 / q '..:.' J I *]*'I:: I— L. » Iw' 1 t.)NE. 5 7 9 '25' j 1 087.22 .I, - FEL...EP4• »LONE- .r:.. \wf {wJ 6 N e A NE t tl 5C I rIt E' 1 . F' F--1 c: NE::: -1 , 6 4 ' _ .. I »IELEPHOINaE 5:3. 6 w T F L E PH 0N Ew 5 t N 6 3 --..... .... _..__ ..__.__.- ..._.- __.__.._ -. ._ -_ ....... _.._.. .... +y' a. vM t . per _ to .._ .. .. .... -.... . -.._. ._ _- ....- ..._.. .. _ -_. ._- __ -..._ _ __ _.... _...._....__.. -. _. .__. _ -...__ _._._- ___..- ..__ - - - --2 -._. l..� "1° E ; L... E::: I: °' 1• »1 C:)1\I E 58 q 2 0 I '4 »�{3r�dE 0 . 2 o » 1 ! »� L.1 r�.1 -w' Iw10I'��l [E ! 4 p 42 (? T r_:. - E f" FI O N E 3 . 4 » .4wwl »wI. 1i �I� -II.. 1 1 'C 1° �:: :..: E ~: I' °' 4 "I t► r4l1::: r•'r S r i . "'1 :..L - 'I- 01 •�1!�. .� p i 5 ..I.. 1.: :. 1.... :. I' 1 i:.F r'•I L :. »:r ray -r. g• w t .t tl r a. } 1 57 ? j.,'f e 1 7 8 A" 7 ::L I j V ° {1:: E : :: �' 1 '' / i�a 1 a.» ::� s) t�, C:' I TY 1v1 i F'L_.F�=:Ldl C! C1 T� » .. , • r a.... .I 5... '�r C. ! U C F-1 E= R J+ t �: F.11:r C 1. R I:- Ci T = �, T E F I"' = i 4 �..._ _.. .. FOi t . PE r - .' l OD 1. 1. 1 •� IN!UMBI: R DATE N1.1MBI := R NAME DES FZ I F"' I E:1N 1 .. AMOUNT .... __.. __. .. '. «r... * . / fit t• -•Y. .. 5-' .. ..1. .M I a:.. 1- f `./ . _.... �'•. �[ /,�}. \ � 4 1. ! 0 � »� .. MINN. .1. {['' - Ft^. STATE � ••�• L... _ ..., y[•. ... .f, j�'•• •^ ._. .. _ �» �• t 4 � � L.f � F L... �• t K er .r _ rf1 J{'•• w l (�': S � A " r E D I t I V E � i \..: L 1 C �{•�' t _ ,. . � » q , , . . Q �''{� ��•�''+ _ F F... E' �� , l � � Aw• � M«. ..... - .. .. ... �•� - 2 .+ �;} �.° `� 7 • � MY Pi::' J« 4 fir. .. 1 1 •t . ,_ + .: 11 /2- 11 + L. L. d :� « .. MI S TATE I" �1 l; a U . (: F"� MOTOR T V 1 Id I.._ C (Y+ F- I: I. { P Ai r B I _. E. 9 { ( 7 «� P 0 i�. 115 9A.1 11 l �'2 s 9 i 19 ( - )4 ( - ) ( - -) D E: I `T* P OF I''•1A .. 1 .. 1- JF* F E «)FiSE: 13% D1'-1F '-; L... I C E 1* c.3 E. F E= E:: PAY 94 . 9 A. „ C' 01 : .... _. ... .. .. ••• f ._ Jyf, \ + ' 1 a». • .JU4Jr;'F - lua _ � .1. f a... a � � w \.. � 1 .. .. � .1. •1 w (ea a \� '� .... T R EA S U R E R y��.rr s t- j ..., S �«J .. D R I VE RS i....1 +..J .... ..+ I T FE P ki It ";� f "f .. . }e 1 a \.. E3 0 jJa' 5 0 i 1 i o 1,�l 1 ••,f _ `5 94 :". 11/22/ 5 41. �I C-) C M INN . s TF ;;EA M0 E+-1 L.- :I•. t ` FEES PAY 8 1 51 4 . 2 ::` � e • l«} q 5 14 w 2 id * 5 9A.%1' 11/ 5 41 400 11 I N1 a STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVER'S I.... IC FEES F='AYABL_I7:. 849. C -)o 8A -9 N {; 1 1. .. � . {, .. , t 4 � . _ •.,a ! : a ' _ . 1. . . . � } •} •.r t _� ?. .3 ..1. ta« ! / 3 \»a }�� •. .} �+ f- \. «I - •..� M I NN N M STATE {• ., f .. �� ..�.. - «I-RE�P�L.}URi....Fr. i y } t ., � J [^ 1 (i..)- •1•-0F • i d EI L... I C [,,�•� FE .}....S PAY �f �•• .- _. 1 T 1 1 ABLi... . _ __ . -- -- . '{ —_, _..- �•.{^} �•\ .. .} �,} - - - .....___ .._. _ . .. _ L a« y •»t�3 L.' w .A. f - --... *. 31 » � �\ {::'. 1a q 63\ »a . 1 j i I t ! 5947 11/27/95 5 iiii - ,11 l q t L 0 1 P H P L.J P 1 �1 ET I NG C' «lea S I TA FEES S N° OR I - V I . L \..� + C'E � 1 '4'2 9 1.. q a:« P 0 0 5 1 «' •t � L. y .a:« + 4 0 N j w { ...L 13) 1.1/28 �: i A.:I. 4 t =t Ci 0/111 NN. STATE % '•f' F E 7-A ,c:i !..! F % E * F 1"1 O T O F V I:::: I•-•1 L I C FEES PAYABLE :16. 11. e i.. i. e 5 A' 1 4(-) O M I NN a a TRE - s ' TATrE D R I VE'1 Z L'/ L FEES P A { ABLE 640 N 0C,... _ 6 .I-0 P J -jt t \- { L 11/2 7 a:.. 0 5/ L.• PO B Y F' H E:. F C S T r G E" . y { -� c « � c`� P 4_� r - � �, q 0 00, 1 1 { « 1 i 5 1 7 51 1 11 / a::.9 / 9 5 541.400 MINN.. - 1 1-RE «(- Ui -4E1-4 STATE DR 1 VI.".R. ::) L I C FEES PAYABLE 516 w 50) 510 P 5 �) - i L. 1 #1 » » M I N N . S T . S U1•.ER Mt.. I OF \ JE::.F «1 1... C FEE PA YA B LE A L...E:. 1.5 y 86 5 . • /6 15 n . C65 w � 1.) fi ��{ w�-N. 11 /29/95 :�2 i:��,�� 0 POST MA STER Tr�l��;� - 1 - L: R POSTAG �t�,t.� ��, � — a 1 5•l; 1 C: {.•} L: � \. i \.? 1 r .. f �. ... 1.1 / W ..t {.� ;� / a. , a . •_� •_� � . F• P E». N F : Y I A N '_. t t •\ •. 1 E ! F• i F : D E:.. 1 I '• I �i �� 4 F O R . . \+ is E C F« 1"; E » 1' I � l! lei +••} C a:.. � !' N R I C.I I-1 A F• D LANG L. � � �J I::i .... �.� 1 «� L. 9 L. L. . • .. t 1...' 11 / « •« « / 9\« 5 � t ,1 l 1 1:11.1 P S T A TE ••, .. t •tt » . », T RE A SURER ST .« ... . S 1• D Fs I V ERS I.... I C P a FEE 1~ Apt ABL. «E. a '.' + F- 1'a:.. P �_ii) � •.! +'•� 10f ! i- w .i t 1 - / - .� « / ,_ ,« 41 « M - I � N a S TATE - TR E - A mC.7 "£] ��:I -1 1 I t». FEES f�r.� I- rw� ,�(�Bt�E 16 y 7-'5 - � : � .. 1. 6 I •��. } P .w.[3 !1 i �: , _ _ .. __ . _ _ , T C" F IE C F �� •� �;� 1 4 1 1 ' AliI t 1 i l (.... �: L' :!!. E. :.: !! � ;(:::: v L :}} I A F'l....E::: W O01.i ' F AGE :1. I l w. 5 ' � � } 8 A 1 ! �} u ';� � � � t 1'M 1 °� t =.. I °� f' 1. ; }••� ! � � 1f : !'�; E I � 1: � f 1w: I «� � } .... f ... t . C i': .rf F � 1 : _....... _.... } { ». f .. - -- - -- _ ..._ .....- � EI �IDl..�1� i ......_._.. _._ -_. . {'+. r .« [� ..._.. _.... -. _.. _._.... _. _._._..___._.___._ .__._- ... -_ .. ................ �I .. ....i�d {'i _ - .. ... ... ... .... _........_......._....._.- _.___.._...__._......_..... -.. .... .. ..- _.-... ... __..._..._ _.. _.__... __._.- ..__.._.. .gi. n _.....__.._�- _- __..�.. .__.... .__ .... .»l t ... s { .. -.. __.. -.. . r/ 1 ...l.:r1 I,1 L.!! \r1 B E F%' D A 1- N N AMOUNT At f-1 0 UN T . _ _. _, . _ .•••ir• � (}'' �j .j . -•} fj ^ ••... j S y i. {� • �� ^ �} �. f r L.: j' ! j� 1 f . _ . E ** A»�I L�'1 D M Iw. y L...■ \ C {� /` j �•�• Y .».. j � ..., [� ..., {f'' �+ . 1 1,�T�1' 71' 1 \ R::.t • Ut S �1) t ' M�G F ., .1 it . BF -1 ti _ .._...._ .. -.. __ _ . _ - . . - ` • ... ^•} J"i L:: � ! u r .. i r .. } i r••} 2 2 81 .C« r"1 t C .. {"• 1 a:« i 4::} 5 ! f 5 i ) •'f f"s ( t j L . A F s 3 G.31 � q %J O D Y 1 s p 1 r� ;s (�1 { t t� -�[-- {� {"y �1,� � R EF - 1 -•- U! s � D B D { Y FR I:... s..} j:«. R Y A 1 1 O i si J• �y .u- 0 p t.. � »} 20.00 i 1 . f t..! 5 I 9 r 5 t - ! 1 { - ! r 1 r t - } A - 1 L:•? - I 4 .L { �E �.�. S�� SE RV i�� L l rL: «i? LrEL...L...UL...�...��i l ��..�1 74:« USE a i j ! }\ 1 c 1: A. - � c�; �f 9 -may .. __. � - �- .` _... � � 1:: f ; GJA1 �F� f.:,t-J!=''!'•= '1....:t I:�::::� - 1:`� Q: U I i�''MEtt1"1" ;.. S U PPL.. I Ec:; E: ::F• -I I I.: L1'. ... .. .. _... _ :... r... �.. j -..._. 1:' ar {.J 1. 1-• _. _: •:* _ - ... f .�.• ...- .._-.... _... .,. .� .. f� �..} M - 1 �1 03-0660 _. _. ....._.. j1. • i _ . .. l JRr� tq!{� •. {��yr {�} {} _ . r ! • ' e ' ri y ��• ��•(,. y { ' ••ti .^ dpi. -. .._. . '1 { } ... A N 11� MA L 1.: O N •� 1 1 ♦..f rw- S 1.... t 7 V I C F \..1 1! .F N C a np .m iaa. �r•a,r ;.y -.er ...+. F .r\ ... _.. ..._, ..... -. ._ ._ _ .. . -.. _... _ .._ F� E S I ••^ 0 i •+: \.J F.- R�� I �.« l.1 .. . .... ._ ..... .. ... .... ... {u .'yc -._ .___.. .. ... ... ..._ _ ... _. _ 1 _ y 1 l a . 4 ° •r ._ .tj 1 1 y •., A:« 6 1./ 0 w} f 9 5 0611 6 1. 1 f .. B A N N I G A N KELLY P a A o S C.:. RV V I l r I : 1 --• 1..7 R 0 1 -J T 9 5 6 q 040..-F 5 6 y f » ! 4 r-! 5 a \.. i i - . ..7 �JJ •� J r _ - 1 !. f 9 5 •., •) •� ( :-i f .: 1 1. `{.. • -} ..J , }!'' ( C ( '[ ..+ f "1 I 1..; ! ». 1 ♦ S..r �� ■ rt I I � ( -r n f s j y 1. ! 1 ( `(� • 4 I.... �' °� I •ri 1::� 1 1 11' { i -! it E I 11.::. 1� 1 T i "• r ' i -: I q {.J 0 f n 8 s -! • :� ,j( i - J %.. - i..r 1:. " t y CJ 1.J r u c s. .1::. A. 8 1...::. ! 0 5 ; 9 5 !) 6 . f (' c..! B A IA N y ►..:1 A I' ; if I•- f S; - I ! 7I f 0 '..___.. - _.-- ..__.. }s- ?'4tr.• . . •.. - --._. _.++y -- �"`}t'p - C°!°1------ - -__._ ......�... .. - - ___..____ _._..._. . -- •- __- - _. - - - '-'---_...__ .___._.__..._..._....._....... _ ,...._ ........... ... .. t"\. r -. P - .te.. ..� � 11.a"' -• ... -. _._...�...._.. ___ _._..._....._- :._..- .._......._ \.J I..1 F 1-- I I » S ,� 11._ 1 11: CL.E ._.._.._.._._._ -_ _....___....._....._...- .._.�.. .:.� ----. _....-- -._._. -. ._ ...... ...... -. ... - _ L.!F'PI.... I E:: - `•�' F--! :I: CLE: 11 t.11 =` F' I._ I I� !- !ICI i - !....!'= �, : }' ' r"' [ •� a a _ u A C.r ` tiF F L..t F! E i i { :� ' �`} 1 a« 0 w ' + - 0 8 11 { }� -} B GD I N E , � ! .III E F-'R :�U I--'I._ I E wJ 1 P R OGRAM f SLJi ' F : :' L.. I E s.. \. LiF-'I -' (._ I I. -. \. 8 ::� L. t F• , F -` (.... I L::. (13. ..... F ( I C E:. .w:. a 17 1 °:'RC3 'A S ID Fl- I E S _ - _ - - - - 1: . p 60 9-4 I °tt i 1 1' \11 I }i 10. -7 5 PF II F-• R OG F .f •t1-'1 :.:,t -1F P I..- I I: :.S 1 a ? ta S t..! P F-•' 1... I l.... `.J -... E: L:! L.1.1 F ' 1�1 E N -1 L L . r -� a L :} \ B(' .)Of .: : G 1 a C F'r;OGl= All StJF'F'I..- I ES 6 p ... i;••1 f -it..i _•i .1. :�. f .. 1 - ? , . r..i t } `r :1. ,: «f } f�} / B & MOF j I�4.1 fi I�: SC r L.1...G & I ' .! •-t 1..- .-,. ...�1 =� + A. ! 5 a k- }� .I .' �'{ . �» �- `� rf �r 5 101 -', 5 C BU I I- ^ D E IR;� ' U E Iii .1 N'1 Eh•1�•'1NC�� MA•I I -:.1-; .1. AI. -.; � 8. 50 1-� �1 5f-} .. 5..!' •1 !. a ....1:.. L.i .1:.. •.: ».i r !"' C. .1:« r 0 5 r� .. . •{{ [[�'�S .A..1. � »} t - } 1 � - } (('�' ('� f r} } _� �s (+._ .; p C a 11.r a �• n 1 I 1 A G I i \ •l G S 'lt. c -t ..l I.::. 1 1, »f r r� 1 i? » � C 0 F I L::. F a L. E». h + 1::« _ . N.. 4 i ::� C a � 1 L f l- �.� �j •{ s. c a ! 1 ;S r'.i r .. l -• i .1.- .1... ...r .r... f - i :• - C" r {_--� C .1... r - \.. f 7 'J f Iwa 1 1. c-} 8 ,: ! � -} K r• ..s .r C l � I ' L.J :: ••- ..- ...: ' a t.1 I'�' I�' I - - I' - t •j : ; F I- I .I. Cl.... •• .. r ' 1 Al - - r `' 14 r..} t..i L... t r F.. _ f .... L ` ! a . !` ! (.f L.) F Ff l._ :t E. c :j �� ` .... -1 . . F -I I........ I :1 n r .... �:.. 5 .... ...� .1:.. _c._ . x___._._ �r�- .._.___.._ r_- ^�- �._..^c�� ..: -. .- �,,..__..,. .. w m+x.. N..,...,.., .. m... rAC•. s�..mr..nm,+.w..mcn+ - _,__1L_ ,e,�e..�.,. n�. :. a. nr�w +n- w.rm•wv:*+`x •s+^q'✓+- :. rr : rm• f .: , «M.t. , rcmwry��:.c« waw 'S f 0 t.. c:: 1.°1 F: ., .� �.; .I_ I ,�. r. i F :: { 5. 1 �:::� F I.... C _: txi (::i f3 I G 1.« .. :. ... .. a . - ,.... I I V (.-j ...F -, 3 Vr.:�[J i -'IE f' If.. C" . ( "` }..IF t:, 'r`r:IClC1F=�: ;FI`it'�0 , :.. I "C'i�.'l'�R 1 TEN, C}..IECr : . ka { B r � R �:. �� I•• .._ I`5.1 t «t 1 � { � � I -•:.: 5. DESCI r---'T I ON _ t..� �a{�{�� a t•� �: 1. � 1 M a 1 (_ _... -. ... _..t�� }.my s.•}.l .. _.. - �... ! : w. .. - _... 1 05' ]�c- 7 .. 1.70 _ A ,* }� ; .IC ♦ ♦♦ D n P'"i u I� q E n AMER .i. 1..: �. MERCY ��.. ... .. ... PROGF�tAi 1 SUPT i.- I }•....\..}:_ .. ...... ._.. .. .. .. . ... ... ....... .. .. . .. ....... . .._.. _.__��....� b�1..7 �. s F -0.. ... I .1 J f C r »? 4 «? t .? i r g 1 1 n [ 1 .). �•• I� '(' N C. �•y DE NTA L •'�•' j� r J� •�• C H E CK {''� (� r 't { JJ L . i sl 3 1" 1 I i (» P 1 L I� 1+ I� i=' I`:. i ~ ti �� A .L ' ! j j �} q� 6 6 q A• 8 f�� [ 2 q �i { J C3 q 48 +. 1 t:: ! X. :t .....: ? !; ; . • t ' ♦ «I. .. ._ _ _ �• t 7 1 �• t I t� A. �. i r 5 i..., .� A is i �{ » I F °'FC�i«�F":it�1(. F"`F'L... I _ cS i _ !.J T - ....1'1" i- •r "- jX•• �•�._.. ��ytM� tY �j. _... 1_it}!'•Iltltt - Al. " CE ! 1�5 Ir.I ! Ti•il'• INJ.NG r F-: & T F I Ira I NG a . 47 • ,, .. �' ,a .1 f t . j i i.... & " I I I N I NG 5. A - 70.61 . I , . __� -.._.. l ,i tj _ ._i• - i�.i �. .. _ - _ -..._ .._ .I::. J::. M »: - _.. �.�. f l. 1 J •. }� •• • • � _. ' L " .' i _.. _._ iRr f •. 1 1..i � 1«' _._.... ..r.. _ j1 _ ............._. J:.. �_� t �_� �::� / � . • • •5 {r• - - Y �j � { � j �• . _(�'•'•�1 _. - _..._. .__ - �».• MS A t - ... I� I�:/ Y �I � L� S..J ..._.__ -- _ - ... ...._ _..__..._...._.._... _._ ..... {{•''• (j,��. I y _. f(C� . {{�� NT ~* j �� {{ �_tll ._ •..� I I � - . t I . ::. F 1 ! .M F ♦ - " j » .. .» r - t q y t -- • . • "_ r n .. .. '{'� 1 1 ! J i 8 1. .1`2 05/�' 250800 F. M. F RA•TTALONi.- 8 R I IDIRAP ST0RM SEWER o .I•TL.T 652 18 65 .,:..; . 32. r�? � r ?6 ? 4 C C) F�: At. S) D AN I EL V(:* ••I I CL».E::: ALLOWA � � 1"' t ' •TRA 8 TRA I h.1 I N 1 09 . 00 1 20 . 23 1 G & I{: SERVI UNIFORMS & CLOTHI 54.6 U I F`CII fir C`L» UTH I NI 6 J . b 0 7 11 '._ 1'.2 c ? 5 / 9 "� �: {��.�'r�:_' 5 GLOBAL E0t..! I r'MENT C�:t 8UPPI I E -- F-EQU I r'MEI` aT 4 1 � S ALE -.. TA F•' w O 0 F° Si TATE 4.31 BALES TAX PBL.... OUT OF ; TAIIM 10.27- __- t f I IE..c F:-Qt fiF ME NT t 4 0 \ ! 5 11 ��? t�? G (" 0 X) I Ira C (:J I'l F° A ha ,� 1..! F= F= L_ 11=: 5r: E G) U I r 1''I F I�� T 1.4e 3 q 5 14e.95 2 :'B3 12 /05 /9 5 5 1. 6 GOPHER DISPOSAL OCT 1995 RECYCLING 15 15,625.80 � r.ir...yf 8 •.. r + y._ +�+�_. l -�L;._ _.... ... .. ..1::. f »I •�.! ••� a..f ..- «r.cJ «1 /� . •. »r .i... i »T ..:» t. (�. �f �} \� .r.��s _ B AKE RY , G 1 •� f___i N D I 1 1"_I S _ -. }� _ PR OGRA M ! s.} y� .��{ _ ti 1 1 t1(..+ � n S U r ,~ __ � f..) "} r�.....e _.. ... _ -... ...... ! U. -... - ... _ _ ... _. -. _ } «'F-'S t St..lF F:'L._ I A...S .1. 2 b 7 5 � ' F 'R 0GF_ _ZA11 SUF~ PL I E:r-3 1 7 5 i - -- - -- -- - _ _ -- f 1• ;0GRAM . a� 1F L.. I E:S t 1131 I• "' RQGRA M BtJPPL I E8 12- a j 5 � IJF ~'F "'I_..IES 1ex2 5 „ I I ' R0(*_3r • Li ... l1 1 ti ft..F1}M {.... I ES 1 n i 5 i ,.- _ ._... _ " _'_ -_ '-'_ - - _' _ -' . -_ ._ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ . I' 1 » (..� t:� F " �•� i'rR S l.t F°' F °' L _ 1. (I i F- r o (._I I; A I" I s i..I In r I..» i I -- t "} t2 . 75 � S 1. ) FT L It �l n, i 1 t..; ! P PI..» 1 ES GRAId 5..1 1. "'1 w ; 5 � i �/; L )A . � f 95 !_�t:: t.�� CITY O F :7 1 IPi.•A WOOrj t� U LJ"1 E ° } t� "il F E .1.�� - !" R cv4Ec _ rr ---- - - - - -- ..____ .._ __ _ _ _ . ENDO - . _ __ ___.__ __ -_ _ - .- - -.___ _ . _ __ _ -- _ _ ..._...... ____ _ _ _ .___ -___ . _. _ . _ _ _ _ __ . _ . .... __. -- __._- :_.._. _..._.. - -- . ____. CHECK- � ,I NUMBER DATE NU MBER NAi1i :. DE Gt:::i -t I r -'•r 1 N AMOuNT A1 ! —S J F - - - -- 12/05/95 i { t:} M 4 - 1 1 IEJHY FRENTALf: , INC - — _ --- � -- ` I DE RENTAL. . .. E0U I i 1 E1NJ . •�_ 16.2— a 5 7 1 62.57 I : .G....:.. �.t •..:� � 1 ..::. ! o L: 9 L.= 5 0 6) 64 ... S • 1 . L.» L.y ... ••; t..t H y INC s t.J ... :f: E .::t ..... ' i. ..J '... 2 tl w (C) :. f�ii::::lw't :Ji ° "!° : 1 :�•i °� � :C C:il:::: i a �:: }' GAI_-E;~i TAX PBL. a OUT 0I::� STATE 1 r (- )9.. -. 191 Ill -- - - - - -- 12/05/9 - - -- -- ---- , - - 1�� E;Gt"t1"'_� F"'C:..��:i__ -__ __ —__ __ - _ _ ._, - - -. _ ..__ ._ _ _ . --- - - -... --- Gt..IE"`�"'t_� EL.� �'� �T � _ _....... - -- - - -.. _.__ _ .__ . __ _ _____.._ __ ._ ._.___•�-- �• ---�'" , � ' � i ,:'2 4 1. 1,? t_a � / 9� 3 9 1. 9 00 11 "4 "1 " 1:•:. 1- :;:.)T A Ck:. T.) r= .. i•R0:C i DIi�SEL. !! INC F:ZEI=`AIR 8, 1 /VEH1t.•,1...Ew y �.? .. r �. i:� r e m :• y •..t a �. � I I 2 284 2 ' 'i„ /05 95 45 L» E - a 1 w DEC 1995 TRAINING NETWORK 5 9 7 j ' 1 L. 1 t • J i. 5 t 9 7 � L.� .i J a � .r::. � a:» .�:» `I' •«.� � .w.. l �..+ L.' — i` 7 L f .�„ . f � t � - _° .. -- mr-i ll' ET IN - /l.•r!•.li'•{SLJ1.• 1 AN 1 •i'.7. - — f i....i 7 T R 5i:»R Il•.:E CJ {«7 r .. .. S.3 {�7 a � ..•,� r i I .:... �. 4 r / 9 • ti " r_) 2 r i�l - r r E ! i \i ��s t - r i 1•• is ! 1 L.« F"' ; I L. "i J 1" �- C� C1 J L... " h1 _ _I» 1 ', v j i t 't i � `L L 1" F i� .« ... ... .4 i M d [.' J - 1 :u.�. L t_• a i �� r�� r::. L.+ r »� tl 0 0 2 845 12/05/95 METRO t.::('lSH REGISTER SYSTEMS OUTSIDE RENTAL -- EQUIPMENT PENT 2 : � p 92 27 - - - Tl p ;?., ,.. ._ J _._�.___._ 1 •• �{_.7�'_ -__._ ... C!• t - ice ��'� ._ -_. -�-�+� .•� ''�''�"�}' _ _ _ �'`'�{��'`' } _ �'"� t t�_ TAN ..... [•.:OUNi..r i• 7.... .. _ - ._._... ...... .. _.... .. .._ _ " « ♦ta S E { � /�'•'��(.,.. SEWER- ..i E r � � �\ - L3 L... l�ti Y � 1..+ 1� DEC, .... t 1" "T • !fit -. - j, j � q _ �. - . ' S. R•• l ! 9 1 a 0 ... Y . R ! .. -- 0 0 1 { )`j l �• } f � l i'`'yy ] Y '�'f' i 1 2 / ( - -) 5/95 C` �';S �' �1 5 4 a:•..�:.. 0 0 MINN �• ('' CO. MINING & 1 i G r � ": O (� F� j '{' + /� S I G 1 '•) s� � cJ 1 E 3' N A L S -j 76. _ .1:. 2 0 1 - 7 6. i d 5( 1 i ' Z - 1 2 1 / C 5 / 9 5 5 MINNESOTA NEGOTA MINING & MFG. CO. 1::0NCF -_F T 110NE_Y 366. 1 - - - - - - - }. - -_ - --- --r-._ »Eitrr _ - - .... _.__. _ .. _ . -- - _ . trA r 1�rr.= r�A r�cE IIATrr� A�.� ... _ _ _ _ __.._._.- - - - __� , -- - -- - -" - - . _ _ . _ ,: A. 1 2/ " L. / : L. 6 NA •• i .. I ON "L.- E NV I R (..1 1 1 HEALTH S U BS CRIPTIONS & 1 1E I F' a ; ��) a c_� ; 7 C' 8 51 12/05/95 661750 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIES 160)0 A.. LJ . •1 .. .1. L....1: " i . L t::. ` ::s � . 5 try 0 : Lj 1- 1 L . i E °� y }( _ U T- •1. I ... 1 ,• I ,. I E:..• c ) 1 "} e 1. p .1 � _ 1 I 71 **f* : L L... I i« I E::. ` L'.`1 '2 e, � �� L3 97 I 1J]" I t..- I T I E% 3 5.1. r� __.. 7 c J p 4-1 _._ 1 I•i ; t..l " C' 1 L...1. " ! ?. E «. .) '. �, c « ! tl «1 A. •!iii t.J - 1•• .1. L.•. 11 .1. i:: :. %•a 1 45 - 1 7 �. .i. r R..� •..} f 3 LJ :E L... :1: •'F I E ::c, 1 1 06 , 4 5 I .. ." (36. 79 j t..1.•1.• I #..•.1: T I E °. ;:: 1 i : w; cry 1'' t ff "- •:; L. ... �'(::lt.:li. id 1 "�:l : :..:;' 'D h1�:::i+ '1....1 *.Wf : 01. !'`t y�:�l:: r :.. .. _:.. n .. I L .. .. S ! L JAL i 10 t:.J Cl H E -, i ir� { ►Fwrl i tl� �,�`!: h:lli iF 1 T M I TF c1' - 1F' (: I'-.I IlB �l Dr � � ! ' ! D ES � �.� I (� 1 1 i:1' � � �1%11'1 ! 11 r t r t...... I ! U .•I.. 1 I„•. I TI E S 16 62 y �} s 6 t..) .. I_ IL-I TI E S 1 r? 4 5 4.44 t..l • I • * 1 L. I T I E S 2019 � 4 : „ t.: 5 u -ITI 2 » ' t _t „I..1. I_.. I T I E.- S 1 4 a 8 1. U T 11._ I '1 I E 474 ..::. 0 6 w 1.1. t..J T 1 f: „. I T 1 F� �� .14 01 2� a � -. t..1..1.. 1. „. " '( f '' 'I • f : �x1 £� � � � � 6 8 w ;' �• � • - t.. j 1- 1 1 _.. 1 I I I" S 1 9( �i / 1. t I 6 6 5 a - 41. _ - 1 1� t.....1 E... I T 1 E:. � *l 6. _ » . •_ t_1 1 „ ILI T IE c'*)'* 22 345 13 0 ..I.. J I-, T' I' Cl ( t „1 I f I E: f.:} 1 �_j �_? �' > 1 g f t « ?' t..l T.I: I.... 11 E7 S 1 t_) a t „? 12 7 5 U'1” I 1 I - f' I ES 1695 1 - T I E» L. 1 4 + �-j �I 2 a 19915 1 0 , 05 4 (..l .. I .. :i: L...:E T I E:” � . ' 1 C) 4 9 .14 •1 � TI� 5 L.1 ~f•IL1'. w3i 225 �? 44 1 , w =f5t' ; 52- 1.12 C. 5; `? 5 66�' °'_ 5 1 NOIRWEST .9AN K MINNESOTA PAY I ICIC AGENT F=EES — ANNUAL-95 340.00 PAY Y I NG Ate ►EN”! F•' E ANNUAL.- 95 3, 4 » w C „ PAY I NU AGE F 1~ »� t�11�11�1a(�1 „„ <.;1�. ». �s�.. ?. - ---- ! °' l Y I N + f 1 G E : l`:1 - f' F*° F.:- E � --'• � i N N l_1 i 11 -. �' `: '_; a 1. r�y „ r_? c�ti I : -'AY I NCB AGEEI`aT F° EF.�,:; -- ANICIUA1.... �'; � =4 {�? a 0C*) F:: '�` l 1�l A �C'1�1'1 F S "A�t� NUAL 9 ' I::rAY I NG AGE�C�1..I.. FEI�S „„ ANNUAI- �?5 � 4c- ?.a C?c� 4 1 ' 1 rk� AGENT I "1" F° EE: ANNUAL- UAL« LY 34C �� 0 1 ::: = �Y :r. r7 ASE : h�1T 1~wF�h: ANru .. { f} t ~ fi r -.. �• „Y „ �_t { 7 I °' Ei Y I 1 \1G A G [: T F:° E_ E :- S_ ANNU 9 5 14C) f 0('.. � I:::' i 1 Y 1 1` °1 E t` t i. 1°' IH E -. S -- A NN U A L- r? 5 3 4 t.? a Cl C. F'tY I N( + {(iE °liT F °'1”- [=�allt•Iliu`tL ,;� r - f ��. F °'AY 1 N - 3 r i {aI�- (��I'1« I= -� - f• AI` =.INUAI.- � .:� �":� t`? „ 0(**) � iY *1 I%1 A GE°:N F:: E °:EH. „- ANNUAL -. Ll* 5 73. 40 a 0 0 I::: =; �`Y i:1`:1 ; t [: E #° .. 1..1 "I:- � 'ANNUAL- c ?w� . sA10 a OT- N(. *” i= tf::';I: ° :1:.I F� "I :EEj ..... �il�ll' }It..1AL �',� ,:_: -'. 5� � � � t 1' - -- :�•i..: 1~ ;_ i �» r �; «.f • 5 . •t .A. e::. i • „r i L,.i { # , i , ,: j. ? �.:? .t. .... ... _- "a 1j C r .... ,..} ..r a „ 1 F '1 ` _ 1 1`'� _ E t \ f} Y t I t {� (1 t 'v �: �` I • f l F'� T ti::} I„.. ��A 1. I "i. 1 1.1 1..� i..J „ I ~ 1 1..31��1 , C ... -_4 .. E - -} { 4 . . 5 r' 9 � . " .r »' ( � ??�:; :. r r.? 4: (::! �! E ::1.... f... p F:: F 1 1 1....:f P F = a 1 ,1...1 :f F: F I N G FOR �� D A'1” A TE RM I N A L- S .r a ` 22 ` 7 48 . 2 7 . . i y ., 1t.J1J : I -i! ; #-:.a:. ,} 1^y f '- I `. i ( . ( . � .. + .. o E:.. n .A. { "r C IT y 01»•~ 1vI , 1 .... EW00 ) C {i.. _ ter _ L � O � � i..J 1 L.. F i k_: - 11 •... k. • I F 3 1 L :J " 1 " �� . F _ i �, : �: I r-• G I:_: ,: . VUUE.J1...1E R/ 1= f E1 1 t' 1 EWCIr .. N UMB E R DA *T1_.: t%l R 1'� A1 -� DESCI�� 11-'T :1: x::11 \1 AMOUNT AMC.31.1N..1« � _ - '22135 .,:.. 72 .. PRE:«C I S I n1 1 BUSINE SYSTEMS -- . .. .. ... . SUPPLIES . «.. OFFICE .... _ .56 ..yam. 1 5 L 5 I 8 5 6) 12 3 _ F-•' U 1'11* -' A N D 1"1 k:...1 1 ": S E 1 °: V I C E p 1 i`•1(.., a FUEL & Q 1 L 8 41 r'" A � ' • • i • s 1:: E t / -1. F - A 1 {_y 1. cF {_� .., . F• \ 1 .J q 1'' l ( F" E:» k ]. r1 #.... " I `r` q I N E 5 � -' ` � PROGRA ' . � U F F "' L....I. L._ S..J t t •-, { - 5 a....�...�.. Y i 1 _ A _ t' 3` =x[ 35#:8.. __ . 2- f f 1 _ _ _ 7-C-'_j � � �_.. -. __. _ . ROS1:..DALEw . («.1• "1EV SUP PL 1-':_S _•.. V C,E - . _ _ . _ 2 1 94 sU PPL I E'1 :* •-" VE_F-1 C:L._E 11.17 --.V C{ _50 . __._ _ _ Ui '_" F-I CE PRODUCTS C' p - -._. _ _ _.... - -_ . SUPPL 11' l.') «. C.31""F I CE - - - -.. _ _ -_.. _ . _.. -• t. � �_ r . J ._.__ -__ -- «_.._ _ ... __ . .. .......... ._ Ea 1.. I -' F=' t_ I E'S --' 0 F- F.. I t_., k:_ .94— J UP1W'L_ I E:.:C -- CF=F I CE 97.19 2 2 {::) C a A-A- ` 1 .r::. � { ..f 5 / 9 5.! • 7 7 0 0 W 5 S ld 1 i 11».. L E (" i p TONY 7 �1 � ' t („! "I" i=t �l ,� E L. T � {fix {wy N {�� 5• � ti �r�� {"� "� 0 " I ' -� .,:.. � � 1 1 a �� .,� ��. � - �.�..�_ S� E C -_' MATER I AL— � � r��C . ■._.__.._ _ _ _ __. _ _ - ._ . T � R UTER B 1' r'3 - � Vii•:: +.,:_ : t�i� . r"3 q - %3 .« +.,:... �.a :�+ ry J 2E:3 62 1 05 /95.j 84 {_ 2 2 ' / 5 ST ■ JOHN' F••IU RLF••'CJF;T 5 r2 5 5 .I 1 22 86 "' 1 1 2 / {_5 #:34 { « 4{_a5 ST PAUL q Cr I TV 0I-. AUG SEPT kr OCT REPAIR -?f 1`'1A .E 1*%.I T 6.24.92 j A 'Z3` . & OC REPA & M s I h1 "I" 99 4 9 .9 ` AU G SE _ 8 1= �I~'fi= *tT�5:1� �_- 1'1�1IhtT t -1 t_ 6 Sk:F"' "f �; OCT FiEF�'f i I F 81 1"1i fi� 11`�#�" _' "' � :?' AUG SI =� #w'T & 0C T RE�:1 :- A I R �f MAIN 1" 8 8. � 3 u a .. 5 4 "E36 1 .x:.. ' / 05 / 95 E� M 1 {_ 395 SUNRAY AIJ "1"i� PARTS .�IJF�'F'L_ 1 ES -- S�LF-1�. E.l_�. �' ` �r { r;�. ■ T ■ -- S 1•-fi 1 t"\ TS _ _.... 1-� A 1 ,.., U 1" 1=' 1_" I t _ _ . __ ....... . _ _ . _ ._ . _.. _._. __._._ [ C » '"i~t ( C ' j Ca ' .-� ± ( , •' f •' Rt" GRA1 1 SUF ... I E 4 6.09 � q ��::�:1 q • i { rt ,1;. _:. .. . �'.3i)6 « » 1 r'/0: /9�t...._._ ._ - 60;50 - -... T3 .... `•• _� q I. TARG )T t 1. *%'L.* C1: - C Al /R _ _ �3k 3 _- 1E�.'1`t.1`1 5. .J 1•- F-' #.._ .1. E�. s. 1 w� k�� t..J .l PM ENT " r+ � PR , j [ r S; r r � F L.J � f i A F - 1 5..� U 1" F L 1 E::. S e••i :)/ 1.,? /05.,t 95 E36 { -)V " 1 .. ' .. IUl'1 - # {'jNq 1) 0 U G L ... AS l.I a 1I >6!, T RAINING-** E380501 T'Rl':::ADWAY U1�A# •F-1I1�� i� #, # ='1" -U :i�M :::;1..11�'F= '1«..1 E�:::i _ j+ 54 M 40 F- ' c l:) UF °'F'L_ I E_.S 1 0 3 r 0 { =} 857. a(.s_>, '. ... -_ ._--. _.r«y c..!'J :E - ..F - }, - - -- ,:.. t...Cfc.Y . r:y �.I..t i" 1..� - - - - - -_... .. ". 5_ + , ._.... __ F' • 1... : C!} �... .. .. c t=3 t •_ M - :1 5 � T C% I �1 TES T RANSP O RT AND . . TOW _ .. ... - - �5 X) ..._ __ _ _ _. __ . , N 0i { »? i t t i� .� 8 81 { "a t y T W IN I ha k«J E " 1 'r' I�! h~l F "' t... k..J 1`f1 F °' ! 1 Y SUPPLIES -- OFFICE r t +::+ i 00 • f 1 1..i. y / 0 5 � / { r� 5..+ 8 9 0 9 •... { «t a 5 a �J .� � � a 1 "� l..d 1'•. • • • Ce -rtif ica.tlon- fee's f ©r coaches . `,; 11 "� J - - - .. _.. _ � }. F � F C' 5 9 01300 « e r t s 5 LJF° PER 1;'1:1: D w E� E : t � E) Pi L E:: i.a C O r _. ::i U Fl F� L...:E E E: _ ". J r " "s x':1:1: T (: l F'* :i: �•-•s L ". + t.. J 1= #- "' 1. «..1.1 -:. r : a J i..:t 1 \1 J I { 11: .L c" t 1.... . . 1 ..5 .... .. .« .. ., f• L. I . :' : - . �.. 1 t: L f ll 1... I t) . ! .. `.:' N r . • . 1 )' i I r r • -:+- .4_.L «1.J •.-+ J•• - {:. �� ::: ....{:..I { �5.�! ! 5.! j «•, .l. .. �..- .. .. `• I � {{ } ... j ,... J " 5 .. 1 •YS,�..1�.� 11 1•`1 {'r- `�1.... 1 � . 0 « . �. I .. l S..J I 1 1::* .... .." V "' ... t .... ( .. Y .... I..,+ i�, ti .:. I is \ 1 �.. 5 �r«y , 1 �;11..J� '�,1�r.1•�' ., �•tc ... A ... - I F' r c..; FA F:":1 : : :: lyl 0 v �Y' f 11 I ...` 9 L f _...- .•— aW- nr«•I^rsPnvw.v+v.e s * :N.PeRa�mrvnf4a)Stt Moll :... r \ii...I .... ... ryt..! t F7 i I' I i 10 I r `..r i...i r. L..` F . i 1 ` i i 1. 1.r 1'• \ ! t :.; i 1.? (.,! it it 1,,,, f 'i t.i tl F i tl (� t �� :i�...!�- i�:t,:::.i:., �.�;..., i r'��..�i�i;::�i�::i�•.. '.. .. \ �::ji:�� l...i � T r' r �. (31 1 F AMOUNT 1OUit�T � fM U i i +"i f .. p : � ..i 5 .. � � _. fi L. L. T Cl O l E"' .1 P t P ,6 1 1. F E 1. T i' S - ( %.:3LJPPL T E- EtaiU I PMi:: NT �� {=;r a 4 3. 71 5' ..: .r: 4 t. :! r \. ! ........: i '- 1 q «i W r 1 W i L. 1 1 '� i�_ _ � —\ � —y q i \ rl t �}�,q p �-- .. ........ I P w l,, 011 •- .. »U I .. . 1' G t( �•�••�• .. _ . I N � � C 1 I l.J��'1 . ^.r t.. M1"1 i' I NC, I i 10 N I r 3... \.. a r .. j f . R _ C"OM11 i✓'I .... F_!MB 1 Nt:' I N,:tiPECT I OIraS r f'� � a Cl C)__ i i i 1,1,1. f i I f ' 1 i i I .- ...... _...�_... _._._.... ....... _.._._. . .. ....... ...._..._.__.,._._.,_. 29 q 620. 81 .. ... ... i __._._.__._.. __..___. .. ._.. ... ...... _.. _...._ i - -_.... .,. -... ..... _...... _.._ .... .._ __...__. __.._.. _...... ...__. ------ .--- ..__.. CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 1 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ALLENSPACH , SHERRY 301.92 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/915 CARLSON , THERES E 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BODINE , RENEE 999, 51 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 FAUST ,DANIEL F 21731, 9 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ANDERSON ,- CAROLE J 596,95 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 DEHN , DEBORAH 688005 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 GIBBS , MARGARET 7 9 0.01 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 HANGSLEBEN , RI CHARD 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 KLAGER , WENDY 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 VIGNALO , DELORES A 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BEHM , LOI S 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 CARLE , JEANETTE E 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 JAGOE , CAROL 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 OLSON , SANDRA 879.56 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 FULLER, ELAINE 605.73 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 POWELL , PHILIP 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ALDRIDGE , MARK 1 5 3 9.13 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BECKER, RONALD D 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BOHL , JOHN C 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 FLOR, TIMOTHY 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 JOHNSON , KEVIN l , 312.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 KVAM, DAVID 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 STEFFEN , SCOTT L 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 YOUNGREN , JAMES 2 1 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 2 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 EVERSON , PAUL 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 FRAS ER , JOHN 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 PAS, STEVEN 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 SAUNDERS , SARAH 1, 8 6 0.61 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ADELSON , LINDA 886.55 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 STAHNKE ,JULIE A 1, 8 8 9 ,10 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 RAIDER, KENNETH G 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 PRIEFER ,WILLIAM l , 5 3 4.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 LUNDSTEN , LANCE 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 OSWALD , ERI CK D 1, 3 8 7.7 0 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 DU CHARME , JOHN 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 MATTHY S , RUS S 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 PECK , DENNI S L 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ANDERSON , BRUCE 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BURKE , MYLES R 1, 3 8 8.31 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 MARUSKA , MARK A 1 7 7 0.71 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 GREW HAYMAN , JANET M 8 0 2 .4 3 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BARTA , MARIE 1 2 0 5.11 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 COLEMAN , MELINDA 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 EKSTRAND , THOMAS G 1, 6 9 3.14 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ROBERTS , KENNETH 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 STAPLES , PAULINE 2 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 ANDERSON ,MICHAEL 560.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 BARTEL ,DENISE 1, 2 9 6.31 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 3 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 EASTMAN , THOMAS E 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 OLSON , RONALD J 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12 / 01/95 RYMER, STEPHEN 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12 / 01/95 SALMELA , AMY L 49.50 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 RATHBURN , RODNEY 458.79 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 HURLEY , STEPHEN 1 6 8 3.4 4 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 PRI EFER , LORI 104.00 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 TAUBMAN , DOUGLAS J 1 DIRECT DEPOSIT 12/01/95 COLEMAN , PHILIP 587.74 49102 12/01/95 BASTIAN,GARY W 343.12 49103 12/01/95 CARLSON-,DALE 301.92 49104 12/01/95 KOPPEN,MARVIN 301.92 49105 12/01/95 ROSSBACH,GEORGE 301.92 49106 12/01/95 CASAREZ,GINA 1 49107 12/01/95 DAWSON,CRAIG W 2 49108 12/01/95 HENSLEY,PATRICIA 54.78 49109 12/01/95 LE,SHERYL 2 49110 12/01/95 MCGUIRE,MICHAEL A 3 49111 12/01/95 ZICK,LINDA 345.00 .49112 12/01/95 JAHN,DAVID J 1 49113 12/01/95 HAMPTON,ROBERT W 11.88 49114 12/01/95 PIEKARSKI,GREGORY J. 36.75 49115 12/01/95 CUDE,LARRY J 337.60 49116 12/01/95 MIKISKA,WILLIAM 210.40 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 4 CHECK CHECK NUMBER -- .---- - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT 49117 12/01/95 - - - - -- OSTER,ANDREA J --------------- - -- 1 49118 12/01/95 BEHAN, JAMES 1 49119 12/01/95 DeBILZAN,JUDY 473.49 49120 12/01/95 MATHEYS,ALANA K 1 49121 12/01/95 AURELIUS,LUCILLE E 2 49122 12/01/95 FRY,PATRICIA 911.84 49123 12/01/95 SELVOG,BETTY D 78.00 49124 12/01/95 JOHNSON,BONNIE 757.41 49125 12/01/95 KELSEY,CONNIE L 822.90 49126 12/01/95 VIETOR,.LORRAINE S 1 49127 12/01/95 COLLINS,KENNETH V 2 49128 12/01/95 MARTINSON,CAROL F 1 49129 12/01/95 PALANK,MARY KAY 1 49130 12/01/95 RICHIE,CAROLE L 1 49131 12/01/95 RYAN,MICHAEL 2 49132 12/01/95 SVENDSEN,JOANNE M 1 49133 12/01/95 ARNOLD,DAVID L 1 49134 12/01/95 BANICK,JOHN J 2 49135 12/01/95 BELDE,STANLEY 1 49136 12/01/95 BOWMAN,RICK A 1 49137 12/01/95 DREGER,RICHARD C 2 49138 12/01/95 DUNN,ALICE 1 49139 12/01/95 HERBERT,MICHAEL J 1 49140 12/01/95 HIEBERT,STEVEN 1 4 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 5 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 49141 12/01/95 LANG,RICHARD J 1 49142 12/01/95 NELSON,ROBERT D 2 49143 12/01/95 RAZSKAZOFF,DALE 1 49144 12 / 01 / 9 5 SKALMAN , DONALD W 2 49145 12 / 01 / 9 5 STAFNE , GREGORY L 1 49146 12/01/95 STILL,VERNON T 1 49147 12/01/95 STOCKTON,DERRELL T 1 1 949.61 49148 12/01/95 SZCZEPANSKI,THOMAS J 2 1 142.70 49149 12/01/95 THIENES,PAUL 1 49150 12/01/95 WATCZAK,LAURA 1 49151 12/01/95 WELCHLIN,CABOT V 1 49152 12/01/95 ANDREWS,SCOTT A 2 49153 12/01/95 BERGERON,JOSEPH A 2 1 527.27 49154 12/01/95 DOWDLE,VIRGINIA 2 1 405.31 49155 12/01/95 HEINZ, STEPHEN J 1 49156 12/01/95 KARIS, FLINT D 1 49157 12/01/95 MEEHAN,JAMES 2 1 357.94 49158 12/01/95 MELANDER,JON A 1 49159 12/01/95 RABBETT,KEVIN 2 49160 12/01/95 THOMALLA,DAVID J 2 49161 12/01/95 VORWERK,ROBERT E 2 49162 12/01/95 EMBERTSON,JAMES M 1 49163 12/01/95 BOYER,SCOTT K 1 49164 12/01/95 FEHR,JOSEPH 11922.85 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ - AMOUNT 49165 12/01/95 - - - -- FLAUGHER,JAYME L --------------- - -- 2 49166 12/01/95 HALWEG,KEVIN R 2 49167 12/01/95 LAFFERTY,WALTER 1 49168 12/01/95 PETERS,JILL 825.27 49169 12/01/95 RABINE,JANET L 1 49170 12/01/95 CHLEBECK,JUDY M 1 49171 12/01/95 KIRWIN,HELENE 523.83 49172 12/01/95 DARST, JAMES 1 49173 12 / 01 / 9 5 EDGE , DOUGLAS 1 49174 12/01/95 FREBERG,RONALD L 1 49175 12/01/95 HELEY,RONALD J 1 49176 12/01/95 KANE,MICHAEL R 1 49177 12/01/95 LUTZ,DAVID P 1 49178 12/01/95 MEYER,GERALD W 1 49179 12/01/95 NAGEL,BRYAN 1 1 313.91 49180 12/01/95 ELIAS,JAMES G 1 49181 12/01/95 LINDBLOM,RANDAL 1 49182 12/01/95 PRIEBE,WILLIAM 1 49183 12/01/95 BRENNER,LOIS J 1 49184 12/01/95 KRUMMEL,BARBARA A 624.95 49185 12/01/95 ANDERSON,ROBERT S 1 49186 12/01/95 HELEY,ROLAND B 1 49187 12/01/95 HINNENKAMP,GARY 1 49188 12/01/95 KIESLING,FRANCES M 150.00 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 7 CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT 49189 12/01/95 LAVAQUE,MICHAEL 1 49190 12/01/95 LINDORFF,DENNIS P 1 49191 12/01/95 SCHINDELDECKER,JAMES 1 49192 12/01/95 HORSNELL,JUDITH A 730.95 49193 12/01/95 HUTCHINSON,ANN E 1 49194 12/01/95 KUNDE,MARGARET 175.00 49195 12/01/95 MACY,RITA 52.00 49196 12/01/95 NELSON,JEAN 739.35 49197 12/01/95 SOUTTER,CHRISTINE 60.06 49198 12/01/95 LIVINGSTON,JOYCE L 869.66 49199 12/01/95 MISKELL,NANCY 329.28 49200 12/01/95 WEGWERTH,JUDITH A 1,277.11 49201 12/01/95 ERICSON,JAMES 110.63 49202 12/01/95 CARVER,NICHOLAS N 1 49203 12/01/95 OSTROM,MARJORIE 1 49204 12/01/95 WENGER,ROBERT J 1 49205 12/01/95 BASTIAN,ALEX 149.50 49206 12/01/95 BOWMAN,TRACY 156.75 49207 12/01/95 CHASE,TANIA 140.00 49208 12/01/95 DAMIANI,ROBERT 91.00 49209 12/01/95 NELSON,JOSEPH 70.00 49210 12/01/95 PEASLEE,LUKE N 86.00 .49211 12/01/95 SCHULTZ,JOHN 40.00 49212 12/01/95 STEINBRING,MELISSA 160.00 7 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD E CHECK CHECK NUMBER - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT ------ 49213 12/01/95 - - - - -- SUMMER,CHRISTY ------------------ 90.00 49214 12/01/95 WARD,ROY G 476.00 49215 12/01/95 BREHEIM,ROGER W 1 49216 12/01/95 EDSON,DAVID B 1 49217 12/01/95 GERMAIN,DAVID 1 49218 12/01/95 NADEAU,EDWARD A 1 49,219 12/01/95 NORDQUIST,RICHARD 1,233.90 49220 12/01/95 THOMAS JR, STEVEN 1 49221 12/01/95 ATKINS,KATHERINE 447.42 49222 12/01/95 COONS,MELISSA 526.24 49223 12/01/95 DOHERTY,KATHLEEN M 1 49224 12/01/95 ESTEVEZ, DIANE 181.90 49225 12/01/95 FRAZER- JOHN,JENNIFER 649.77 49226 12/01/95 GLASS,JEAN 608.67 49227 12/01/95 GRAF,MICHAEL 829.74 49228 12/01/95 HOIUM,SHEILA 502.33 49229 12/01/95 HUGHES,JILL 88.40 49230 12/01/95 KELLY,LI8A 342.92 49231 12/01/95 KIRCHHAMER,TODD 72.00 49232 12/01/95 MEINKE,JENNY 138.38 49233 12/01/95 PETERSON,KAYLENE 415.51 49234 12/01/95 PETERSON,RICHARD 512.83 49235 12/01/95 SALITROS,DARLENE 648.33 49236 12/01/95 SCHMIDT,RUSSELL 174.20 E CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD X CHECK CHECK NUMBER - - = DATE - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------ AMOUNT ------ - -- 49237 -- - 12/01/95 - - - - -- WARMAN,ROBIN ------------------ 606.26 49238 12/01/95 ARCAND,CHRIS A 82.88 49239 12/01/95 BADEN,MATHIAS 141.00 49240 12/01/95 BROTTEM,TRACY 286.88 49241 12/01/95 CALLEN,JENNIFER 18.00 49242 12/01/95 CHAPMAN,JENNY A 45.00 49243 12/01/95 CROSSON,LINDA 989.91 49244 12/01/95 DAVIS,WENDY 513.88 49245 12/01/95 DOTSON,ALISHA 321.75 49246 12/01/95 DRIVER- YOUNG,VICKI 35.00 49247 12/01/95 FLANAGAN,MICHAEL D 15.00 49248 12/01/95 GRUENHAGEN,LINDA C 72.00 49249 12/01/95 HOSCH,JESSICA 103.00 49250 12/01/95 HOULE,DENISE L 72.00 49251 12/01/95 IKHAML,JOHN 165.00 49252 12/01/95 ILLI,SARAH 34.50 49253 12/01/95 ISERMAN,MICHAEL L 180.00 49254 12/01/95 JENSEN,MATTHEW 750.96 49255 12/01/95 JOHNSON,JESSICA 488.60 49256 12/01/95 JOHNSON,ROBERT P 96.00 49257 12/01/95 KAUFMAN,GINA 486.25 49258 12/01/95 KLETT,ANNA 72.00 49259 12/01/95 KRAEMER,JILL 604.00 49260 12/01/95 LIVINGSTON, KELLY 378.55 X CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 10 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER ------ - - - - -- DATE -- - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME -------------------------- AMOUNT 492 61 12/01/95 - - - - -- --------------- LYSTIG, CHRISSY - -- 6.00 49262 12/01/95 MARUSKA, ERICA 123.00 49263 12/01/95 MEISEL,TAMBREY 24.50 49264 12/01/95 MILLER, CANDI 153.75 49265 12/01/95 MCQUILLAN,ANNE S 180.00 49266 12/01/95 NORTHQUEST,JONEEN L 60.00 49267 12/01/95 PLACHECKI,MELISSA J 30.00 49268 12/01/95 POWERS,JESSICA 237.00 49269 12/01/95 SCHONES,DUSTIN 114.00 49270 12/01/95 SELIN,JONATHAN 78.00 49271 12/01/95 SIVERSON,OLAF L 165.00 49272 12/01/95 SWANER,JESSICA 75.00 49273 12/01/95 TAYLOR,ALEX R 15.00 49274 12/01/95 THIBODEAU,KELLY M 647.90 49275 12/01/95 UNGER,DANIEL 35.35 49276 12/01/95 WEDES,CARYL H 54.00 49277 12/01/95 WESTBERG,JENNIFER 70.50 49278 12/01/95 WILKINSON,NICKOLAS W 141.00 49279 12/01/95 BOSLEY,CAROL 84.50 49280 12/01/95 CHRISTENSEN,JODIE 190.69 49281 12/01/95 DIRKSWAGER,COLLEEN 1 49282 12/01/95 DULL,KELLIE 221.07 49283 12/01/95 FRANK,LAURA 39.00 49284 12/01/95 GOSSMAN,SAUNDRA 47.25 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 11 EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD CHECK CHECK NUMBER ------ - - DATE - - EMPLOYEE NAME AMOUNT - - -- 49285 -- - - -- 12/01/95 ------------------------ - - - - -- --------------- JOHNSON,ARIEL - -- 38.81 49286 12/01/95 LEHNEN,LORI 43.88 49287 12/01/95 MC DONOUGH,DARLA 16.88 49288 12/01/95 OLEARY,VIRGINIA 30.81 49289 12 / 01 / 9 5 RENSLOW , RITA 123.19 49290 12/01/95 SAGER,TENA 43.88 49291 12/01/95 SANCHEZ,HELEN 25.13 49292 12/01/95 SCHROEDER,KATHLEEN 189.00 49293 12/01/95 ANDERSON,MICHELE 185.94 49294 12/01/95 AUER,DANIEL 356.90 49295 12/01/95 BAILEY,DEANNA L 99.00 49296 12/01/95 CHRISTENSEN,JANET 279.35 49297 12/01/95 CURTIS,CARL D. 987.51 49298 12/01/95 ERSFELD,ALICE L 154.00 49299 12/01/95 FLEEK,JOHN S 132.00 49300 12/01/95 HURT,CAROL J 186.00 49301 12/01/95 JAQUES JR,MARTIN 245.40 49302 12/01/95 JAQUES,THOMAS 175.00 49303 12/01/95 LATHAM,BETTY 480.66 49304 12/01/95 MILLS, DEREK 121.00 49305 12/01/95 MOSS,STEPHANIE E 139.50 49306 12/01/95 SCHLINGMAN,PAUL 1 49307 12/01/95 SWANSON,LYLE 1 49308 12/01/95 SWANSON,VERONICA 789.40 CITY OF MAPLEWOOD EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS REPORT FOR THE CURRENT PAY PERIOD 12 AMOUNT --------------- - -- 108.00 76.50 1 1,393.11 TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 262,934.46 CHECK CHECK NUMBER - -- DATE - - - - -- EMPLOYEE NAME ------------------------------ ------- - - - 49309 --- 12/01/95 WATKINS,RASHAD A 49310 12/01/95 WILSON,DION J 49311 12/01/95 MULVANEY,DENNIS M 49312 12/01/95 SPREIGL,GEORGE C 12 AMOUNT --------------- - -- 108.00 76.50 1 1,393.11 TOTAL GROSS EARNINGS 262,934.46 AGENDA ITEM. Fdow AGENDA REPORT Action by Council TO: City Manager Endorsed...-..� FROM: City Engineer R e J e c e Date SUBJECT: TH 61- Beam Avenue Signal Agreement DATE: December 4, 1995 In the summer of 1996, Mn /DOT is proposing to reconstruct the Highway 61 -Beam Avenue intersection. It is their intention to add an additional southbound left turn lane. This will significantly increase the capacity for southbound Highway 61 traffic to turn on eastbound Beam Avenue. In addition, Mn /DOT is proposing to resurface the intersection and do some minor drainage improvements to remove the severe sag that exists in the intersection. Maplewood has no cost sharing in this project. We are, however, involved in the signal agreement because of our Opticom system. The attached agreement betwee Mn /D Ramsey County, and the city addresses cost sharing b etween Ramsey County and Mn /DOT. In addition, it identifies some req uirements concerning the Opticom or EVP system. Since the city has no cost involved and currently exercises the operational requirements in the agreement, it is recommended the city council approve Agreement 74350 for signal system revisions at Highway 61 and Beam Avenue. KGH jC MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 74350 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY AND THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD TO Revise the existing Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption, Interconnect and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 19 (Beam Avenue) I n Maplewood, Ramsey County, Minnesota. S.P. S.A.P. 62- 619 -20 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED County_ of Ramsey. $34,020.00 None Otherwise Covered THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State ", and the County of Ramsey, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Maplewood, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 (1994) authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system; and WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justifi cation and it is in the public's best interest to revise the existing traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 19 (Beam Avenue); and WHEREAS, the Ci ty and the State agreed to the Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption System, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP System as a part of the traffic control signal installation on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 19 (Beam Avenue); and WHEREAS the County, City and the State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the revised traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System, interconnect and signing, as hereinafter set forth; 74350 -1 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal which shall constitute "Preliminary Engineering The State shall also perform the construction inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth, which shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service pole or pad, shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall revise the existing traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 19 (Beam Avenue) in accordance with State Project No. 6222 -127 and State Aid Project No. 62- 619 -20. Estimated Construction Cost is $63,004.00. State's share is 50 percent. County's share is 50 percent. 4. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, the County shall advance - to State - an amount equal to its portion of the project. costs. The County's .total portion shall consist of the sum of the following: 74350 -2- a) The County's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices. b) Eight ( 8 ) percent of its share [Item (a) abovel for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 5. Upon completion and final acceptance of the project, the County's final share shall consist of the sum of the following: a) The County's share (as specified in Paragraph 3 ) , based on the final payment to the Contractor. b) Eight ( 8 ) percent of its final share [Item ( a ) above] f or the cost of Engineering and Inspection. The amount of the funds advanced by the County in excess of the County's final share will be returned to the County without interest and the County agrees to pay to the State that amount of its final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the County. 6. The County shall perpetuate an adequate electrical power supply to the service pad or pole, and upon completion of said revised traffic control signal with street lights installation shall continue to provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of the County. 74380 -3- 79 Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3 hereof, it shall be the County's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; (2 ) relamp the revised traffic control signal and street lights, except for the Red LED signal indications which shall be relamped by the State for the 6 year warranty period and by the County thereafter; and ( 3 ) clean and paint the revised traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast.arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility at its cost and expense, to maintain the signing and interconnect and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. a. The EVP System provided for in Paragraph 3 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements a) All maintenance of the EVP System shall be done by State forces. b) Emitter units may be installed - and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, Subdivision 5 and 169.03. The City will provide the State's Assistant Division Engineer or his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter I . units. 74350 -4- c) Malfunction of the EVP System shall be reported to the State immediately. d) In the event said EVP System or components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated., and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP System. Upon removal of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receivers, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the State. e) All timing of said EVP System shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation. 9. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of the County or City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of this State . on behalf of said employees while. so engaged . , and any. and all ; claims made by any fourth party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work 74350 -5- contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the County or City. The State shall not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of the County or City . 10. All timing of the revised traffic control signal provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 11. Upon execution and approval by the County, the City and the State and completion of the construction work provided for herein, this agreement shall supersede and terminate the maintenance and operation terms of Agreement No. 66958 dated May 10, 1990, for the intersection of Trunk Highway No. .61 at County State Aid Highway No. 19 (Beam Avenue), between the parties. 74350 -6- CO=IY OF RAMSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: ------- B Assistant Count Attorne Chairperson of the Board Dated Count Risk Mana (Count Seal) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Count En B Chief Clerk - Count Board 74350 _7- CITY OF MAPLEWOOD APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By Mayor ( City Seal) By City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Assistant Division Engineer Operations Division APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: Assistant Attorney General State of Minnesota By Assistant Commissioner Dated DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION By Dated DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE By Dated 74350 -8- i ,. • s RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood enter into an agreement with the State of.Minnesota., Department of Transportation for the following purposes , to wit: To revise the existing traffic control signal with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 61 at County State Aid Highway No. 19 (Beam Avenue) in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 74350, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Ramsey City of Maplewood I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Maplewood at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of 1995, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. City Clerk (Seal) AGENDA ITEM AGENDA REPORT Aotion by Co unc i l: . Endors a d TO: City Manager Modified . ]Re je cte d ---- FROM: Assistant City Engineer,-Fu" - Dat SUBJECT: Project 93 -14, Searle Street Storm Sewer Revision and Closure of Project Budget DATE: December 4, 1995 The Searle Street Storm Sewer project was recently accepted as being complete and maintenance of the storm sewer was accepted by the city. The project was council directed and has successfully met the goal of handling the neighborhood drainage to the satisfaction of all of the affected property owners. The project budget currently is $49,000.00. Total project costs are $62,730.00. It should be noted that the low bid for the project was $35,184.30. This was $10,424.30 over the original estimate. The project budget was not adjusted to compensate for this difference. In addition to the higher construction bid, an above normal amount of time was spent by engineering staff in discussions with the adjacent property owners due to easement negotiating and the opposition to the project. Excess engineering charges may be conservatively estimated at 25 percent or approximately $3,825.00. The sum of these costs unaccounted for in the original estimate is $14,361.17. Adding these costs to the project budget would revise the budget total to $63,361.17, an amount in excess of the total project costs. It is staff's recommendation that the project budget be revised to $62,730.00 and the project be closed. The finance director may be authorized to make the financial transfers from general taxes necessary to implement the revised project budget. The final financing plan for the project may be as follows: Assessments $15,062.90 General Taxes $47,667.10 TOTAL $62 jC AGENDA ITEM JP # AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: City Manager Assistant City Engineer 2� Action by Council Endorse V� �/g11Pi` Modif ie d......., ReJ ecte .�.. Date Project 94 -06, East Shore Drive Storm Sewer - Revision & Closure of Project Budget December 4, 1995 The East Shore Drive Storm Sewer project was recently accepted as complete by the city council. Maintenance of the storm sewer is now the responsibility of the Public Works Department. The property owners adjacent to the project area are satisfied with the success of the improvements. The total project costs are $51,570.00. The current project budget is $41,090.00. As noted in a previous agenda report, dated October 4, 1994, the low bid for the project came in $12,000.00 higher that the estimate. The difference was due to significant design changes between the feasibility study and the final plan approved by the council. A revision to the project budget was not addressed for this difference. Adding the $12,000.00 to the budget would revise the budget total to $53,090.00, an amount in excess of the total project costs. It is staff's recommendation that the project be revised to $51,570.00 and the project be closed. The finance director may be authorized to make the financial transfers from property taxes necessary to implement the revised project budget. The final financing plan for the project may be as follows: Special Assessments: $9,450.00 Property Taxes $42,120.00 Total $51,570.00 r,...W Acts -on by Co un cille MEr�o vM Endorse To Michael A . McGuire, City Man ; From: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of P eat '• od Community �o� �o�e� Subs . Final Payment To Adolfson &. Peters. o y Center • Date Date. December 5, 1995 For The December 11, 1995 City Council Meeting Introduction Adolfson & Peterson was the g eneral contractor for the Maplewood Community Center project. The total Community Center budget to Adolfson & Peterson was $5 ,599,425.78. The Com- munity Center was substantially completed September 1, 1994. Back zound During the past fourteen months, staff has worked in close cooperation with Adolfson & Peterson to resolve minor construction issues and finishing details. There currently is a final payment of $12,849.99 remaining to close out the account. In addition, Adolfson and Peterson has a $50,000 Security Bond, which was pledged as a guaran- tee to complete the project. The last major issue that Adolfson & Peterson has worked on has centered around door closures and air p ressure. These two issues have been resolved and each of the items have been completed on the final punch list prepared by A.K.R.W. and the construction manager. Recommendation It is m y recommendation that final p ayment be made to Adolfson & Peterson in the amount of _ $12,849.99, and that the $50,000 Security Bond be released. This will close out the Adolfson & Peterson general contracting account and close out the city's financial obligations. _ .. .._...._ .---• _...._�.....,... ,..� �, .a,.,.<*� --n �u.,... n* ..rp,..m «k. .,�... e ,�_+..,cx,,., « . n rn,r>,+mn..- .nnm•+n.. - ---- -- - --•-� `-�-- -- ..�... .__:1.1__ . ,:,� r _e._:._j: -` - - -- - �-- '�---- �- - -- -._ w�.r*m� =r.•n!�,�� ,.�!�� rnmva ^9�=- °„!tnwsoomamsrernr�v��e. ............ .. .... ..... ...�- �a.��:- �'^w ,�mwn APPLICATIOK AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AIA DOCUMENT G702 (instruct' ons on reverse side) PAGF ONE OF PAC, ES TO (OWNER): Ahe Qfy of Maplewood I'R(.))E(A - : Mapl ewood Colmntlill t:y C enter APPL1CAFION NO: 20 Dis to: 1839 ri, Comity Road B 2100 white Bear Ave. 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ............ Frl OWN[ R M11p l ewood, MN 55 109 Mapl ewood, MN 55109 PI.RIOD "10: 8/31/95 Ll ARC 1.11 I .Cl a. "X► of CE)mpleled Work $ _ (Column D + E on G703) Cl CONTRACTOR FROM (CONTRACTOR): Adol:fson f' Peterson, Inc. VIA (ARCHITECT): Ankeny Kell Ri Walsh ARCHITECT'S ❑ P.O. Box 9377 PROJECT NO: El Minneapolis,'MN 55440 CM: McGough Construction (t_ine 4 less Line 5 Total) CONTRACT FOR.Ce Construction CONTRACT DATE: July 12, 1993 Application is made for Payment, as shown below, 'in connection with the Contract CONTRACTOR APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G703, is attached. CHANG[ ORU[I2 SUM Change Orders approved in ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS previous months by Owner TOTAL 227,125, 78 Approved this Month LNumber_ -.. _... D ate Approved - TOTALS Net change by C:Iian Yo e Orders Thc undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR Adolf son, & Peterson, Inc. By: Date: 8 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5 , 372 , 300, 00 2. Net change by Change orders ..................... $ 22 7 ,125.78 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 ± 2) .............. $ 5 , 599 78 4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE ............ $ 5 ,599,425.78 (Column G on G703) 5. RETAINAGE: a. "X► of CE)mpleled Work $ _ (Column D + E on G703) b. % of Stored Material $ (Column 1' on G703) Total Retainage (Line 5a + 5b or Total in Column I of G703 ..................... $ G. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE ................... $ 5 ,599 ,425, 78 (t_ine 4 less Line 5 Total) 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate) ......... $ 5,586,5 8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE .......................... $ 12 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE ............. $ `0.. (Line 3 Less Line 6) State of: Minnesota .� etr AN EAKER Subscribed a . d orn t efore me this IMy�, I� � AMINNES©� Notary public• E PIN COUNTY M Commissi c pf res: p uavrl Won Expres Jan. 31 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR'PAYMENT in accordarice will) the Cowract Documen(s, based ()it opt -site c)hservations acid the dala comprisi► III 1he al)ove applicaliolt, ilw Architect c vrtifiv the ( )w1ier that to thc. bast of the Archiled's knowledge, information aml belief Ili( %Work h. s p r()gressed.is indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the ContractDoc:uments, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CERTIFIED ... � .............................. $ L/ r (Attach explanation, if amount certified differs from the amouc7t (applied for.) ARCH I 1 FCT : By: Date: : This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rifhts of flie Owner or Contractor under this Contract. AIA DOCUMENT (:.'1)2 • Ai'I'I K'AIION AND CURIIf iCA11 rOR PAYMINi • MAY 10111 i DIIION • AIA" • 1c 1011; R- TIII AWRi('AN 1N OI ARCi1I11(` S, 17.11 NI W YO RK AVI "NUI , N.W., WA'•IIIN(;I()N, D.C. 21XX)0 r 1� � �� G702-1983 WAIINING: Unlicensed photocopvinq violates U.S. copvrIQ_ ht taws and is subiect to legal prose ion. '� PAGE AIA bOCUMENT 6703 MAPLEWOOD COMMUNI CENTER ADOLESON AND PETERSON, INC. A & P JOB.3201 APPLICATION NO, 20 APPLICATION DATE AUGUST 29, 1995 PERIOD FROM. APRIL 25, 1995 TD. AUGUST 31, 1995 1 I A ! f I 8 # # C I I D 1 1 # E # F I I 1 I ! % I WORK COMPLETED I I I TEM I DESCRIPTION OF WO RK I SCHEDULED I --- I. I 1 I NO. I I VALUE I PREVIOUS I WORK I STARED MATLS 1 f I 1 I APPLICATIONS I IN PLACE I NOT IN I wrrw I 1 1 ww +lrrwwr wwwwrwwrrww-rwwrrwrw wrrrrrr-rwr wwNwwr I I I DORE I I 1 I MOBI L I ZAT I ON, BOND, I NSUARANCE 1 $75,000,00 1 wrrwrwww $75 00 1 ^rw.w�www� I- �www�wwwrw�Nwww I $0100 1 1 1 I GENERAL CONDITIONS, OVERHEAD I PROFIT 1 $267 1 $267 1 $0100 1 1 1 I W I NTER HEAT 1 $65 00 1 $65, 00MO 1 $0100 1 1 12110 ISITE CLEARINE # $115 1 $115 1 $0/00 1 I 12205 ISOIL MATERIALS I INCL IN 2110 1 I $0/00 1 1 12225 I TREI`1CHING I INCL IN 2110 1 1 $0/00 1 1 12231 I AGGREGATE BASE COURSE I $135, 000.00 1 $135 1 $0100 1 1 12510 I ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVING I INCL IN 2231 1 1 $0100 1 # 12265 I GEOTEXTILE REINF RETAINING WALL 1 $61, 000100 1 $61,080000 1 $0100 1 # 12276 IMODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL I INCL IN 2 1 1 $09 1 I 12484 I SEEDING 1 $59,000.09 1 $46 1 $12 1 f 12930 ISODDING I INCL IN 2484 1 1 $0/00 1 1 12950 I TREES AND SHRUBS I INCL IN 2484 1 1 $0100 1 1 12515 1 PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS 1 $500900 1 $500/00 1 $0800 1 1 12520 1 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING I $95, 000100 I $95, 000100 I X0100 1 1 %7 ISITE WATER LINES 1 X58, 000100 1 $58,000,00 1 $0/00 1 1 ,675 IDISINFECT I TEST WATER DISTRIBUTION SYST1 INCL IN .2667 1 1 $0100 1 1 12732 ISITE SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM I INCL IN 2667 1 1 $0100 1 1 12750 IMISC. SITE IMPROVEMENTS 1 $4 1 $4 1 X0 /00 I # 12811 I LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION 1 $15, 000100 1 $15, 000.00 1 $@x 00 1 1 13310 I REINFORCING STEEL LABOR 1 $331000.86 1 $33, 000100 1 $0100 1 1 13310 I REI NFORC I NG STEEL MATERIAL I $40, 1 00 1 $40,006,00 1 $02 00 I I I IFOOTING & FOUNDATION CONCRETE -LABOR 1 $134,000900 1 $134,000.00 1 $0600 1 1 1 I F : I NG & FOUNDATION CRETE -MATL 1 $90,0001,06 1 $90, 000.08 1 $0.00 1 # 1 IS.O. G1 I MISC, CONCRETE LABOR 1 $92,000400 1 $92,000.00 1 $08 00 I 1 I 151 O1 t1 & MISC1 CONCRETE MATERIAL 1 $95,000, 00 1 $95,000.00 1 $8900 1 I 13320 I TOPPING L I $6 1 $6,000900 1 $0100 1 I 13320 I TOPP I NG M I $8,000,00 1 $8,000,00 1 $0100 1 # 13400 1 PRECAST CONCRETE I $70,000900 1 $70,000M 1 $0100 1 1 14200 I MASONRY LABS I $425,000000 1 $425 000100 1 $0100 1 f G 1 1 I f N I I 1 # I I 1 I # TOTAL I COMPLETED I % I 'BALANCE I RETAINAGE I I STORED 146/0 I TO FINISH I # TO DATE I I. I 1 (D+E+F) I wrrrrrwrrwwrw I (C -G) I 1 wwrr�r $75 00 1 1 rrrww- 100%1 rwrwrr ---- I- $01 1 I X67, 700.00 1 100%1 $0,00 I f $65 1 1 $00,00 1 f $115,000100 1 100 %I $00 041 I ! $0100 1 1 $0100 1 # $0100 1 1 $0/00 1 1 $135, 000100 1 1 x # $01 00 I # X0 1 1 $0100 1 f $61 I 100%1 $01 N I f $0900 1 1 $0/00 1 f $59, 000100 I 100% 1 $0000 1 1 $0800 I # $0100 f t $0100 # 1 $0/00 1 # $500.00 1 00 %f $0/00 P 1 $95 1 100%1 $0/00 I f $58,000.00 1 100%1 $0/ 1 I $01 00 1 1 $0100 1 1 $0100 1 -1 1 00 1 1 $4,200100 1 100 %1 $0,00 1 1 $15, 000, 00 1 100 %1 $0.00 1 f $33,000,00 1 1 $0100 1 f $40,000100 1 100% l $0.00 1 I $134 00 1 100 %1 $0100 1 1 $90,000.00 1 100%1 $0.00 1 I $92 0001 00 1 10w 01, $95, 0001 1 100%1 "s 00 I 1 $61 000.00 1 100%1 $0100 1 1 $8 ,000,00 1 100 %1 $0.00 1 I $70,0001.00 1 100%f $0100 I $425, 000.00 1 106%1 "1 SO i I PAGE 2 I I A 1 1 I B 1 1 C 1 1 I i E t f F I G f I 1 1 H I I # I t 1 1 WORK COMPLETED I TOTAL - 1 t 1 t I ITEM I DESCRIPTION OF WORK I SCHEDULED 1 ---- COMPLETED I % i BALANCE 1 RETA I HAGS 1 1 NQ, I 1 VALUE I PREVIOUS I WORK I STORED MATLS 1 I STARED I(G /C) I TD FINISH I I f I 1 I APPLICATIONS 1 IN PLACE I NOT IN 1 TO DATE I i 1 f wwww 1 1 .I www NwAww�wwNwwww�www�1 /N�wwr��Iw�ww�ww�Iw I ��w�wwNMw�IwwMAw 1 I �rwwwwwwwww�IAw1�w 1 I I www�wwwwwwl��wwww D OR E I (D+E+F) 1 I (C--G) I 1 14200 I MASONRY MAT I $254 1 $254, 000.00 1 � wwrwlYwwNwww��w 09 00 1 � wwww�l/N 1 +Mwww�wr � �w��w� $254,000,00 1 1 Nwwww�ww�lw�w�ww 100% I f w�w�wwwwwwNlll�w� �: . . .. $01100 1 1 15100 I STRUCTURAL STEEL 1 X730,000.00 1 $738,000,00 1 $8,00 1 1 X730,000, 00 1 100%1 $0,00 1 1 15200 I STEEP_ JOISTS & JOIST GIRDERS l INCL IN 5100 1 1 $0100 1 # ". @0 1 1 $0,00 1 1 15300 1 STEEL DECK I INCL IN 5t00 1 1 $0900 1 1 $0,00 1 I $08 1 1 15500 IMETAL FABRICATIONS I INCL IN 5100 1 1 $00 1 1 $0800 1 1 s0. e 1 t 15520 (HANDRAILS I RAILINGS I INCL IN 5100 1 1 $0,00 1 t $0,00 1 1 $0.00 1 1 1 IERECTION 1 $165,00109 1 $165, N0,00 1 $0.00 1 I $165, 000,90 1 100x 1 $0, 1 1 16 100 t ROUGH CARPENTRY LABOR I s22, 000.00 1 s22, 000, 00 1 $0.00 1 1 $22, 000, 00 1 100x 1 $0800 1 t 16100 I ROUGH CARPENTRY MATERIAL 1 $17 1 $17, 000.00 t "It 00 1 1 $17,000,00 1 100 % $00,00 1 # 16200 1 FINISH CARPENTRY I X50, 000.00 1 $50, 000,00 1 $0800 1 1 $50, 000, 00 1 100% 1 $0000 1 1 16400 IINTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK I INCL IN 6200 1 1 %0.00 1 1 $0900 1 1 $0,00 I t 17110 I SHEET MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING I %41, 00@1.00 1 $41, 000.00 1 $0,00 1 1 $41, 000,00 1 100%1 $0= 00 # 1 1 1 MASONRY WATERPROOFING I INCL IN 7110 1 1 $0,100 1 1 $0900 1 1 $0,00 t 1 17412 I MANUF ACTURED WALL PANELS 1 $130,000.00 1 $130,000,00 1 "It 00 I I $130 1 100%1 $0000 1 # 17512 I BU I LT -UP MEMBRANE HOOFING I $238, 000,00 1 $238, 000.00 1 $0200 1 1 $238,000, 00 1 100%1 $0900 1 # '535 I MOD. BIT. MEMBRANE ROOFING I INCL IN 7510 1 1 $0.00 1 1 $0.00 1 t $0200 1 1 17608 IFLASNIMS AND SHEETMETAL I INCL IN 7510 1 1 $0900 1 1 $0909 1 1 $0800 1 1 17610 I SHEE :'METAL ROOFING I INCL IN 7510 1 1 $0,00 1 1 $0800 1 1 $0,00 1 1 17700 I ROOF SPECIALTIES & ACCESSORIES I INCL IN 7510 1 1 $0900 1 1 $0900 1 1 $0,00 1 # 17800 1 PRE- ENGINEERD TRANSLUCENT SKYLIGHTS 1 $82,000800 1 $82,000000 1 $0800 1 $0000 1 $82 1 100 %1 $0,00 1 1 18500 I TRAMS, PALL WALL SYSTEM I INCL IN 8900 1 1 X0.00 t I 1. $05 00 I 1 17500 #JOINT SEALERS 1 $17, 000, 00 1 $17,000,00 1 $08 00 1 1 $17-NO.M 1 100%1 $0800 1 1 181 I STEEL DOORS ARID FRAMES 1 $70 000, 00 1 $70, 000.00 1 $0.00 I 1 $70, 000; 00 f 100%1 $0800 1 1 18211 I FLUSH WOOD DOORS I INCL IN 8211 1 1 $0,00 1 # $0. 00 l f $0,00 1 1 18710 I FINISH HARDWARE I INCL IN 8211 1 1 01 00 1 1 $0.00 1 1 $0900 1 t 1 I I N: ALLAT I lit DOOR FRAME HARDWARE 1 $22, 000.00 t $22 1 $0.00 1 1 $22 1 100x 1 $0.00 1 I 18305 I ACCESS DOORS 1 $4,60189 1 $4, 600,00 1 "s 00 I 1 $4, 600. i0 1 100% $0,00 1 1 18330 I OVERHEAD DOORS 1 $23,000.00 1 $23,000.00 1 $0.00 1 1 $23 0 .00 1 100%1 $0000 1 1 18410 I ALUM. ENTRANCES & WDW SYSTEM 1 $168 1 $168, 000,00 I X0.00 1 1 $168, 000.00 1 low $0000 1 1 18800 1 GLASS I GLAZING I INCL IN 8419 1 1 $0.00 1 1 $0.00 1 1 $0800 1 1 PAGE A I A DOCUMENT 6703 MAPLEWOOD COMMUNITY CENTER ADOLFSON AND PETERSON, INC, A $ P JOB 3201 APPLICATION NO. 20 APPLICATION DATE:AUGUST 29, 1995 PERIOD FROM; APRIL 25, 1995 TO: AUGUST 31, 1995 I A 1 B 1 C i D I E 1 F t I I 1 1 TO FINISH 1 ! WORK COMPLETED I I ITEM I DESCRIPTION OF WORK I SCHEDULED I--- N_... N____ M___ N_ N......__...N_....NNN__N.._._�N I I NOR I f VALUE I PREVIOUS I WORT{ I STORED MATLS I I I I I APPLICATIONS 1 IN PLACE I NOT IN 1 i $02 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 DORE I 17250 ISPRAYED ONF FIREPROOFING 1 $386, 0009 00 1 $386,800,08 1 $0800 1 1 19215 I VENEER PLASTER I INCL IN 7250 1 1 $0.00 I 19250 IGYPSUM DRYWALL I INCL IN 7250 1 1 $0,100 1 I 19270 I GYPSUM BOARD SHAFT MALL SYSTEM I INCL IN 7250 1 1 $0300 1 I 19300 I TILE 1 $109,000200 1 $100, wee t $0900 1 I 19500 1 ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILING 1 $48,000.00 1 $40,000,00 1 $0,00 1 1 19520 1ACOUSTICAL WALL TREATMENT I INCL IN 9500 1 1 $0 000 1 1 19553 I WOOD FLOO]RINS 1 $160,000,00 1 $160,000.00 1 $OR 00 I 1 19770 I RESILIENT ATHLETIC FLOORING I INCL IN 9563 1 1 $0.00 1 f 19650 I RESILIENT FLOORING 1 $62,008800 1 $62 1 $82 00 1 1 19680 ICARPETING I INCL IN %50 I 1 "see I 1 19705 I RESINOUS FLOORING 1 $3 1 $3, 000.00 1 $09 f 1 19800 I SPECIAL COATING 1 $109 1 $109, . 00 1 $0800 1 I 19900 (PAINTING I INCL IN 9800 1 f $0.00 1 1 19950 1WALL COVERING I INCL. IN 9800 1 1 $01,00 1 1 ' 0100 I W ISUAL DISPLAY BOARDS 1 $3,300800 1 $3 1 300.00 1 $0000 1 I .10160 ITOILT PARTITIONS I $11,000900 1 $11,000,000 1 $0200 1 1 110200 I LOUVERS AND VENTS 1 $13,000,00 1 $13, 000.00 1 $0.00 1 1 110400 I S I GI I $11, 000800 1 $11 0009 410 1 $0900 1 # 110500 I METAL LOCKERS I $50 1 $50 1 $0,00 1 1 11M [FIRE EXTR CAB I'NENT AND ACC. 1 $4,000s@9 1 $4, M 1 $0800 1 1 110652 1 OPERABLE PANEL PARTITIONS 1 $45 00 1 $45, 000. 1 $0.00 I 1 110800 I TOILET ACCESSORIES 1 $14 1 $14, 0008 00 1 $09 00 1 1 111054 I STALE RIGGING, CURTAINS $ TRACKS 1 $92,000.08 1 $92,000,00 1 $0,00 1 1 111132 1 PROJECT ION SCREENS 1 $6 1 $6, 000800 1 $0900 1 I 111400 I FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT 1 $46, 000.00 1 $46,000800 1 $0 00 I I 111480 1 GYMNASIUM EQUIPMENT I $96, 0009 00 I $96, 0008 00 1 $0900 1 112690 I FLOOR MATS AND FRAMES 1 $5,000,00 I $5 1 $0,00 1 1 1127 1 AUDITORIUM SEATING 1 $76, Nos 00 1 $76, 0008 00 1 $0900 1 i 113032 I SASS CART WALL SYSTEM 1 $3 1 $25 1 $0,00 1 1 I f I 6 1 1 I TOTAL ! I _ - - -- - - - - -- 1 1. COMPLETED I % f BALANCE I RETAINAGE I $ STORED 1 (GIC) I TO FINISH 1 ! TO DATE I I I 1 t= +E+F3 I I (C_G) I 1 $386,000, 00 I 100%l $08 00 I i $0,00 1 1 $OR 00 I I $0800 1 1 $9, 00 1 1 $00,00 1 i $02 00 1 1 $100, 000' 00 1 100%I $OR 00 I ! $40,000.00 1 IN%I $ 1 1 $09 1 I $09 00 1 1 � ,000.00 1 100% $0. 1 $0.00 1 1 $0.00 I $62 1 100 %I $8900 1 1 $08 00 1 1 $08 00 1 1 $3,0009 00 I 100% I $08 1 1 $109, X10.00 1 100%1 $00 09 1 1 $0* 00 1 1 $0600 1 f $0,00 I I W ee I 1 $i i, 000800 1 100 %l $OR 00 I 1 $13, 000.00 1 100 %1 $0 00 1 1 $1 i, 800. m 1 100 %1 $01, 00 1 I $50, 000.00 I 100 %1 0. a 1 1 $4, ON, 00 1 109%1 $0,100 1 i $45,000.00 0 1 100% 1 $0.00 I H $14, env 00 1 100%1' $0 f $92, 000.00 1 100% 1 $0.00 . 1 1 $6,0008 00 1 100m $0900 1 1 $46 00 I 100% l $0,00 1 1 $%, 000.00 1 100 %1 $0.4l0 1 1 $5, 000, 00 1 1401 $0800 1 1 $76, 0009 00 1 100%l $0900 1 1 $25, 000.00 1 100% l $0,100 1 ! PAGE AIA DOClJMENT 6703 ABOLFSON AND PETERSON, INC. MAPLENOOD CITY CENTER A & P JOB 3201 APPLICATION NOw 20 APPLICATION DATE.NMT 29, 1995 PERIOD FROM: APRIL 25, 1995 TO: AUGUST 31 1995 I A 1 B 1 C I D I E 1 F 1 G 1 H i 1 1 WORK COMPLETED 1 I 1 ! TOTAL t I ITEM I DESCRIPTION OF WORK I SCHEDLLED I ------- COMPLETED 1 % I BALANCE I RETAINAGE I I NO, I I VALUE I PREVIOUS I WORK I STORED NATL5 I I STORED I (G/C) I TO FINISH I 1 i I 1 I APPLICATIONS I IN PLACE I NOT IN I TO DATE 1 I I 1 i I - w_-- _-- - I 1 - - - -- 1- N ---------- _N I ----------- I N I D OR E 1 I] +E+F) I I IC -61 1 1 - 114240 1 HYDRAILIC ELEVATOR 1 $38,000.88 1 --- %38, 080, 00 1 X0.00 1 1 , $, @Me 00 1 100%1 $0.00 1 1 1 1 CHANGE O BER 1 1 $29,649s@@ 1 $29,649,00 1 $0.00 1 1 $29,649, N 1 100%1 $0200 1 i I I CHANGE ORDER 2 1 $68,267a 00 1 $68 267. U 1 $00 00 1 1 $68 00 1 100%1 S0. U I 1 I ICHANGE ORDER 3 1 $21,122.00 1 $21,122»00 1 som 00 1 1 $21,122. 1 I00%1 $0000 1 1 1 CHANGE ORDER 4 1 $73 1 $73 1 $0.00 1 1 $73 1 100% I $0200 1 1 1 I CHANGE ORDER 5 1 $34,377s@@ 1 $34,377,00 1 $0,00 1 1 $34,377o@@ 1 100% I $0, N I I I i TOTALS I 1 1 $5 1 I 1 $5 1 1 % 12, $50.081 1 1 $0.00 1 I $5,599, 425.78 1 I 100%1 1 $911 U I I I i $5 "a 00 315- 00071 FPS INVESTMENT SERVICES PER. FBS 612 973 -3600 INVESTMENT SERVICES OPERATIONS Qo eox a -1674 ADVICE OF CREDIT* MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55480 11/09/1495 CUSTOMER 302647 PAGE 1 PAP DESCRIPTION 50, U S TREASURY BILL RETAIN THIS ADVICE FOR YOUR RECORDS PATE MATURITY SECURITY RECEIPT 11/16/1995 912794T53 740328 ADOLF.SON AND PETERSON CITY APLEWOOD -COH CENTER ATTN ANDY PETERSON MPFP0601 INTEROFFICE NAIL FEDERAL WITHHOLDING 0000 01 118 INT AMOUNT DATE 50,000000 11/16 STATE WITHHOLDING - TOTAL H- TALC -ID 41-0731300 PAYMENT CHECK FORTHCOMING ACCOUNT NET AMOUNT FUNDS AVAILABLE 11/16/1995 50,000.00 F 400 to INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Bruce Anderson CC: Action by Council: From: Pauline A. Staples Endorse ,�,..�.,...�„ Modifie Date: November 17, 1995 ReJ eoted D ate Subj ect: Budget Transfer from Contingency Fund I have figured out the needed information for the budget transfer request from the Contingency Fund for Maplewood In Motion. Deficit far the November issue publishing $825.00 December Issue publish 40 pages at $143.73/ea = $5749.20 16 photo's at $7.50 /ea = $ 120.00 January Issue (if we publish) 8 pages $1725.00 Total request $8419.20 This large deficit is a result of the large number of pages this year, photo's and half- tones and extra copies for distribution due to increased numbers from the Post Offices. The reason that the January issue is in the 1995 budget is that it is published in 1995 as one of the twelve issues. We have never had such large issues or published so many photographs and halftones as this year. I do believe also that our publishing budget is short due to the extra copies order for distribution in the MCC were taken out of this budget not the MCC budget. FROM THE DESK OF... PAULINE A. STAPLES RECREATION PROGRAM MANAGER MAPLEWOOD PARKS AND RECREATION DEPART. 2100 WHITE BEAR AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109 (612) 779-35521 Fax: I ' ' MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FRAM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Final Plat PROJECT: Mapleleaf Estates Second Addition DATE: December 5, 1995 INTRODUCTION It F I[od.if ied �e� ecteC`1� fat Tom Gonyea is . requesting that the city council approve the Mapleleaf Estates Second Addition final plat. Mr. Gonyea represents the property owners. This final plat is the second phase of the Mapleleaf Estates development, and would create 24 lots for houses. This plat is along Adele Street, between Demont and Sextant Avenues. (See the maps on pages 3 - 5.) BACKGROUND On December 12, 1994, the city council approved the following motions for the Mapleleaf Estates project: 1. They changed the land -use plan and zoning map from R -1S (small lot single - dwellings) and M -1 (light industrial) to R -1 (single dwellings). 2. They vacated the undeveloped street rights -of -way (Connor Avenue east of Cypress Street, Meadow Lane, Brooks Avenue, the 16.5- foot -wide undeveloped public road and the west end of Gervais Avenue). 3. They tabled the other requests until December 19, 1994. The council discussed the options for street access and chose Cypress Street and another connection south or east of the plat. The council requested that we revise the staff recommendations accordingly and put this on the December 19 consent agenda. 4. They requested a copy of the previous Gervais Avenue feasibility study. On December 19, 1994, the city council took the following actions for the Mapleleaf Estates project: 1. Approved a cul -de -sac diameter variance for Demont Avenue. 2. Approved the east one -half of the preliminary plat. 3. Tabled the west one -half of the plat until February 13, 1995. 4. Approved increased setbacks for two lots in the plat. (See the minutes starting on page 7.) On February 13, 1995, the council tabled the remaining part (the west one -half) of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat until June 12, 1995. On June 29, 1995, the city closed on the purchase of part of open space site #116..Maplewood bought 17 acres of land from Mr. Gonyea and Mr. Pillsbury. This is the area south of Forest Street, north of Keller Parkway and::west of Gervais Avenue. On August 14, 1995, the city council took two actions about this plat. The council: 1. Denied the west one -half of the 1994 Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat. The city denied this part of the plat because the city bought the property for open space. 2. Approved the .revised preliminary plat :(received by the city on July 24, 1995) . for the Mapleleaf Estates. This approval was subject to the December 19, 1994 conditions of approval. (See the preliminary plat on page 6.) On October 9, 1995, the city council approved the Mapleleaf Estates final plat. This plat created 31 lots for houses and four outlots. DISCUSSION Mr. Gonyea is progressing with this phase of the plat. He has finished all the conditions the council required for final plat approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve the Mapleleaf Estates Second Addition final plat. Approval is subject to the county recording the deed restrictions and covenants required by the city. psec9 /maplelf5.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Proposed Final Plat 4. Preliminary Plat 5. 12 -19 -94 Council Minutes 6. Proposed Final Plat (Separate Attachment) 2 Attachment 1 0 • ` N 6 .. •� 4 Q .. W �l Kohtmar� Uj Lake . • � COUNTY •fir O4' M Z3 2 ALVARADO OR P At.bl .3 8CLU CREST 00 • • CI 4 DEALMLLE DR •' • CT. P S WEI X W DR • . CONNOR Cd�� A 3 CT • EM D W a PKWY pp- VWNG DR. � l.�ce V W � 0 LAURIE CT. � 3 Z Y RKE CT. 00 BURKE AV Ml N w � PW* v z ELDRIDGE Av W C}ehriine B ELM 0 Nrt v Lake AVE. W S K I LLM N AV. KEL�p KENW 000 ! LOCATION MAP Q f 3 SITE 2 v' G� 0 D ° I9 1. SUM CT. 3. DULUTH C7. 4. LYD 1A ST . BEAD o a Q O W LARK J D b•- CT' t� U .� Co. < W Uf L LELANC � RD. W �? U JUNCTI0 N K OH LMAN AVE.. Z ° ITO a E �n -•� to • W (1) CKAMBERS ROAD C ..� <<L TO ,r LA- ELDR 1 r r . J k u BEL)JO1971 1. ►0 l� GOV SKILL �•, Av E- ti { SKILL MA � CO NOR A D v o } a G ERVAJ S AVE. LOCATION MAP Q f 3 SITE t; Q COPE LARK J D b•- CT' t� -.. o Co. < _ RD • V) L LELANC � RD. W �? ° Cr � JUNCTI0 N z AVE. W Z ° a E AVE. a 8 (1) CKAMBERS ST c� LA- ELDR 1 r ,RSE . BEL)JO1971 1. ►0 l� GOV SKILL �•, Av E- ti { SKILL MA � D LOCATION MAP Q f 3 SITE Attac hlnen t 2 PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 4 N os 4 h� % � ,� 10 4.b •t t +' � " �► �, 7 • 50 ciV) 6 Alm. wl �) 3 7 Sip so 3 2 3.10 34. z i 1 . ...._ 2 � G• Z6 arc . 7` � t s X AV E • o 4 14 13 p') t c am} .,5�� ,� :• TOWN AND COUNTRY V 4 3 �''E' 4 '� Lw -009� - Omissions, 84.45 is 1 t' .} (40) d .^ - ��+ - .► - .- �• ,. l ob ? 3 _ e+� `g l 03� 1S „ � (�3) M i d o 8 . _(4.) !S K � � �-- ` s,4s• s ,, - • � ._ A I ^% 10 11 14 son ._ 13 1� �. 4 �. OZO- Q 7 77 • �/. . 31 �►+ (v) (,�) (- c 0 3 _ ,.,• _ � 1.5 sc. / . ( 0 - 23 ) 4j 4 _ S � T d 0% .. r, � (4.) n t t � o �b,of Sias I j�.SS se + o.a5 �� 0 ; : .,. b # � � �� 3.00ae. 3 . A 140, . r3 14 f d 12 � 1 �, � W , 0 so l h N ix 145 - O 72 ; a �rT• o Csa) 3 R OO KS - ” ��2 >- ��; - C) �� 4sa�.) � •,z. a�e.� `, ° ; • �tl 7(&,9 ;, 1 7 .3 3 ' ♦a O.. 040 ��2 I 20 t h ! d j 2 Tota I • t4.44eac. _ Al 9 �3•e9 205. 9s Ma It aaf Dri ,ti Thh a trt ►' Ao� ac.) / f -0--m Z•fi{ ��. 7l. . r err• Wit• �m r• A � ,�'�� - � � CATE r �•:�`' of � � son � Q cut � / ` 0 I C. ; %4,3 0 c Q / .mo X37 i ( wMEMO o ;o o POND �- �^ / J [ 41).97 so 335 i �, ;� Vida t9 UP gwk,,A%2 __ { .?.+C)ae ,,� .99oa 2 ! 9 ,� •tip' +� ' a. � P � � 'o N • � 3. ►7 ac 120 1 rQ ; IOU .$lac• t • PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 4 4 N Attachment 3 M" ELEAF ESTATES SECOND ADDITION i-NOW A6.. WLN B: iKU PNLILls '•luI Mltp 919..1 Lalu'e,.. :I... u W nei u!. ' :v pvr�I :v I. -.110' Ci Ills logoeiny dtnenblr{ properh s1luu Wu i�'tnY (:IV yf Ycybwuod County u+ WLmsey, Slufe a' Wr. r{esolL UJt:ut r•. MAI'.LLLAI LSIATLS, u,,ord:np to the Ie wgeid p the'ev'. Nun w) :Uwltr, Yinneaolu. t•1.s ou..oed Inc Y41le !v Le a4rVeled an, Pv1ed us YArl.t_I.At LJIA'LS SLCOkU AUUI'IUN 61W Jye. here!) 06aI,ate v tre pub c for ls.blc; its forever Me N :.•ic the drenage and ufil:t, ewelne-is us. 4n ,r Inca ylul. :r shnses wne eof so :a Itopolebt 19sares, :n.: , a Y rwsslc Lor, :arofr^ not Caueec these Dreserie IJ W "ned.6, It: wape- atil", Itch Ouy ul 19 r stpnw Yop :�l «�r' relu,se, Ins.. :banla U. {�onyed, Pree,den* " SWI or Y!NNIS01k COUNTY or The foreaoiny Instrument -aii ackrosleapea before n•s Ma "V .,f 19 Ly ' Uarnih U. Gunyea. - reslosnf of YuDleleuf Li:Wiia. ^t L b9hvlr M the corporation Amory PJb:lc, rolntl, Ylnnesa•o y W, Co:nndus:w, l.pi•es _ c hereby or 'f /l.u• 1 have :iw r*Vsu and p-01eJ the propet•y uwc•IUeJ un .Ihla pot :. MAP.JILO IS1ATFS StCONU AUJ!iIUN, !nor Ihi, p:u' :S o ..ur+ec' YP u/ 1•1e %Lrruy, Ihu! wt walantN a:9 Vw"wir il'.y w+ wl I'10 p ; loot u.'d I :JI•NI OC'IID JI J Ivuli 1" ;- mor.unenh •wre been cu•reetr pluvse in the ground as enuwn: 11.0 1, 9 vuii•wv W..nuur) Ines S( i •1 6C rrrr a +e •.n . s . - r,, c,ee�y.wleu - v 11.9 p .:nom. It•e+e - . no .of IanJi .,e der .0-i if, Mi. lee.••.. S1al,lss,Section 50502, Subc. 1, or publlc niynwo.► to be ovolvriulee olhof Inun at %down on tr••a p. - a. rxAt.s IN r,r1 M.wnet 1. LJr Su -sty- Yroneeota - license No. 10947 - tnjwlla ' PIG!, Out . a4L1l5 0 11ruln IR..N rMC 61011011 T Sr? AND YA Ktir IP JCG6C NO. 1014` `. :A!I U; YINNI]UTA majits Own I " 1"'14 DIA. uMe rwa eAkr CL er iGUNTT Oe FA-5 NO. Wee'. JNi5S On"W51. WOWN Tw fere9o:ry SLneyers I.er11114ale was GC•npw eoyOt: astore nle iris coy of ULNL'L: 144115L1 LO{MTT C-4- store YUNOWL1,1 IU'.1rry T9 o) Rvdnsy H. hwvot OVn. r jCer :Led Lui.d •eVOr. 1111 UWA.Ut- Siemer A10119 101 .94Z ANr •MI J,5'AWLS u1 TNL lot .. ANU rw)1 TNC br.TAticc Or OR TO WE" .nee, YIrUS: Notary. PJb:+c. Wrines- . OF1401ynsl SHOWN Yy Comtnlrs'vn f'p:!ei _ - utG 11.lA .pn 01 pus LwNNro SYStl,Y u RASE UPON RMi10 COUNTY •OORN ATILS, MOM A YMCA+ DATUW or 1"3 C of wop we d: k."Ob reAEty rl u• or it., . W. Iy n.a Irr Cuum!; at rte C.h of Yu, e%Uod 1rIr •,WO:... •.,,pl GVad !nis Jlul. A -1 n!ar.anrnls wi:• ;, set ae epectl dro ' y ..rk. ON i.oun; s c.. ^c de stated Cn fnls plat, :CCarJlna to Ytnneeota Statures, �ecllcn SO�.OZ. 5ufw `.. DRAUKOC thD JTIUT` - CASCIICNT. APL 51,OMN TNL; Gary llosticn MO,or Ylchoe YcG..lre, Ct•y Manager r S T.:•e: y„yc_•le Itre to-it "9 yr ..�9 ly � ele'. dou, i;;*4 hive L,99i p,.;d. uliv the -e we •tu Jv fosea cnd Trursfer ewwod Inn Guy of etiNU 5 -it IN %I)'- ,W! w..xllruw 10' LANt,. Otnclo 81 Deputy It U%% uTIPLthltx RD"TID. AMD ty 11.0 w w1V0 Uepor merit rr.perty iu.anon ynS OTHEOW y 0* ON TWS « T Punuonf Iv Wtir -94viu slulules. Se.rwr WaA.4_. W. low nui been eoc•mned un:: :1 - it;, two day of , 19 the Conditkrts of Wrinesola Slatules. Socoon 00t) J)J. Su Ddh.ialor .. dove boon fyil.11ed Ua►id U. Cfoypoo ..5. Rdmssv County Surveyor Count. 1•evot4je•, lvinty v' Nu Tee). }t.te v! Mlnnowfu hsreb/ cer:ih Itwl his plat U' MAPLI:I>t fh;A1tS SILOW; AU:; 11UN wLA 0-red "n the office 01 iris t!Oant1 Wecarder for pub.lc on Inca. da, nt +B of ' "lock _ .w ono via% duly Lilw In Book of P'lal: poy9 oa Do4ument Number i a, acKenna, co•nt, Nerorder III rwpury Reyeho. . T), CI•J,�ly .•f ku .ree., `•lu :e v ! Mi..•,seo�.. n tfeby. ceftlh plot tn.s' plot of HkPL.L.LLA[ "WES SLCONU A )U !-Oh wus f!1YU rI 'ne utnee of pis Ilspistror of TKfes for pubic record en this dcy of '9 . of a" Wus duly Illea in bvvk vt Y1a1 /, Pugs u1 �tn:J:Te,ll :ou 1teKMnu, kpyialror at iltws eanNey�• Je ty Lard Surveyors M rrvil S'ORJnearv. .r:. 1,'•M i1.1 I AD- fY V • , ..s wr.r. LANDI N8 .9!1'48 E ' 34 ,'• r.. .• f. - , I r 11L 1: I. ri • ha .t I Z fj r...•J, - DEMONT AVENUE 1.34 SO _• aL. #�... n � .. .' °, ., n; ,. N89`AP05 1 4 i V r` c 4 r Isis I j W f : "'.. ... . -IV$l. INC 01 1 c to - - f j � 1 J• hY'.1 '.V :� C � lly . r.�•' .. ivy. I ! � •79.8, h d(1 ♦'�ri 3 V. TNw SK ILI m � ., •.,1.61: i'•.1 s i 36.50 8 0 8 E X TAI N T I'� l.O 11141 ,.. A VIE N U E ` ;q s I I 1 r 1"'04 s:'• 1 ?. '. 14 OIO ✓ �� f .. .1 17 • 1 � 14 1, ? t a. , '' •I/1tAr4A.A AJa. ten(, ? lAaEKNT • •a.0 �. � JU1nt E• ! (• t 410, 1 4 . it `.d • NM { e . .Y IL. M e 1 IFS S 89'Z�•06' w 240'01 I _y h h :X.45. •� � NAH PROPOSED FINAL PLAT 5 Q N Attachment 4 I se1r38' W I ! 132.09 ` . 1 :1_ L d �� N 1 r• s �- - I a 132 _ g r 0 �rT. , � S09'3d�4a" W 1 1 C aa1110•1 194.87 132 :C_ _�. oamu 1 ... bi exammm (4-n-64) F8 :: f LiJ FB 2 F8 --=- ---- -• FULL BASE .. 3 . . FB FSLO ---- ---- -- iULL BASEMENT LOOK OUT = v)I Af 3 ,40 4 I' ntm --- fULL BASEMENT SPLIT WALKOUT FWO ----- FULL BASEMENT WALKOUT ` 1 ?e ,00 S - SLAB ON GRADE • ' i = 3 mom`; `'.' FW O 2 FWO 4 swo --- ---- -• SPLIT WALKOUT 1 5 F DEMM _ 5 n '• FS AVENUE F BLO =� T37- 96 lip IN 6 ` "_ $ 9 F'W0 FBLO P FBLO = O l --- 133 1 37 1 36 137 / F8 $ FWO FBLO FWO F - 133 137 136 W 3 137 8 3 8 FB s $ FWO FWO $ a $ Fw0 $ 137 L 1 • ' 1 37 36 .' 9 9 p 4 4 9 F6 $ $ FWO FWO $ $ FWO 8 - - 133 137 136 137 ` 1 0 /\ 10 i 5 5 i �� r ` \ F8 $ FWO FWO $ $ fW0 $ 137 136 137 N 'J . r�• ♦rte i ` t.. 62.52 SW30. F 8L 0 FW FBLO $ , FWO N 212 137 136 137 \ $ 12 Fwo 7 0 ° � Fwo a FBLO ru 8 FOL v 13 V X_TANT �w FWO 2 13 OUTIAT -- i►VENUE ti9 Fwo o - - - eo 7� C 14 FsLO 17 16 0 14 i Fw0 Fw0 15 F a WO 15 ti t` FBSWO •� 2 Tp Sw0 62 178 % •,�� FBSWO `' 24000 % o`' 4 H89'27 OS' E SWO ,'' swo . o ee .; b 1 :............... . ...... z �n $ FB 3r......: N89'27 C. ' 9 ' ' B F8 206 _ SBV2ro6•w PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 2. hapl el eaf Estates Attachment 5 • moved to ro the amendment to t - -he prop osed Counc�lmember Rossbach mo a ve l� vari y Seconded by Mayor Bastian Aye all 94 - 12 - 162 VARIANCE RESOLUTION pp WHEREAS, Dennis Gonyea applied for a variance from the subdivision ordinance. WHEREAS, variance a to the proposed cul -de -sac at the east this pp end of Demont Avenue. WHEREAS, Section n 30 - 8 (b) (3) of the Maplewood Code of Ordinances requires a right-of-way ri ht -of - diameter of 120 feet for cul-de-sacs. pp WHEREAS, the applicant is P roposing a diameter of 100 feet. WHEREAS, this requires a variance of twenty feet. WHEREAS, the history of this variance is as follows: , On October 3, 1994 the Planning Commission recommended that the 1. City Council approve this variance. On October 2 4 1994 the City Council held a public hearing. The Ci t staff ubl is a noti ce 111 t he Mapl ewood - nevi ew and - se y p notices to the surrounding property owners. The Council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The Council also considered reports and recommendations from the City staff and Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE* BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approve the above - described variance for the following reasons: 1. The variance would save part of a wetland. City 9 2. The E stated that the cul -de -sac would be large enough for snow - plowing. 7 Approved the following parts of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat (received by the City on July 26, 1994): 1 Block .1: Block 2, Lots 1 -17: Block 3: Block 4, Lots 1 -4 and Block 5, Lots 1 -7. If the City buys the west half of the plat for open space, the preliminary plat shall also include the Cypress Street connection to Gervais Avenue as shown on the attached Exhibit A. Table the remaining parts of the plat until February 13, 1995. Before the City Council approves the final plat, a .developer shall complete the following conditions: 1. Sign an agreement with the City that guarantees that the developer or contractor will: a. Complete all grading for overall site drainage, complete all public improvements and meet all City requirements. b.* Place temporary orange safety fencing and signs at the grading limits. c. Pay the City for the cost of traffic-control and street identification signs. d. Install permanent signs around the edge of the wetland buffer easements. These signs shall mark the edge of the easements and shall state there shall be no mowing, vegetation cutting, filling or dumping. e. Install survey monuments along the wetland boundaries. f. Have NSP install street lights. The location. and type of lights yP g shall be subject to the City Engineer's approval. 2. The developer shall complete all grading for public improvements and overall site drainage. The City Engineer shall include in the developer's agreement any grading that the developer or contractor has not completed before final plat approval. 3.* Have the City Engineer approve final construction and engineering plans. These plans shall include: grading, utility, drainage, erosion control , tree, trail and street plans. The plans shall meet the following conditions: a. The erosion control plan shall be consistent with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District Erosion and Sediment Control handbook. b. The grading plan shall: 1) Include proposed building pad elevation and contour information for each home site. 2) Include contour information for the land that the street construction will disturb. 8 3) Show sedimentation basins as required by the watershed 4 board. ? y c. The drainage plan shall show catch basins between Lots 5 and 10, Block 3 and dedicate necessary easements for these drains and pipes. d. Provide storm water storage and /or an off -site outlet pipe between Outlots A and B. based on a drainage study done by the developer's engineer. The City Engineer shall approve the exact location, capacity and outlet for this storage. If the City requires more pond capacity, the developer may have to drop lots. The lots shall meet the Shoreland requirements. e. .Provide adequate storm water capacity for the wetlands on Lots 19 and 26, Block 2. The developer's engineer shall P rovide a drainage study to determine adequate capacity. The City Engineer shall approve the exact location, capacity and outlet for these. If the City requires more pond capacity, the developer may have to drop a lot(s). f. The tree plan shall show the size, species and location of any trees that the developer will plant as replacement trees. g. The developer shall relocate the existing water line between Lots 7 and 8, Block 5 and abandon the remaining line. 4. Show the following changes on the final plat: a. Show drainage and utility easements along all property lines on the final plat. These easements shall be ten feet wide along the front and rear property lines and five feet wide along the side property lines. b. Change Street C to Demont Avenue and change Street D to Adele Street. c. Drainage easements for drainage areas and wetlands that this project would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot J that will be south of Lot 19, Block 2. d. Drop Lots 1, 2 or 3 from Block One or channel the drainage between Outlots A and B through a drainage pipe. e.. Redesign the Demont Avenue /Cypress Street intersection to cul- de -sac Demont Avenue. f. If the developer sells the west half of the site to the City, 'he may extend Cypress Street to Gervais Avenue as shown on the attached Exhibit A. All lots must have at least 10,000 square feet above any drainage easement. 5. Show the wetland boundaries on the final plat as approved by the Watershed District. 9 6.* Provide all easements • the City nts requi red by ' ,� in Y Engineer.. These shall t`t inclu a. Give the ci ty wetland easements over the wetlands. - These easements shall cover the wetlands and any land within tw enty feet surroundi and.. The easement shall r or p ohib�t building ny 9 structures within twent feet of . Y the wetland or an mowing, cutting, fillin or dump* Y 9 ping within ten feet of t wetland or within the he wetland itself. The ur ose r P P of this easement is to pro tect the water quality of h � Y t he wetlands from homeow ners fertilizer and to rotect P the wetland habitat from residential encroachment. m b. Drainage* ease ents for the O f f -s i te draina areas and wetlands that this project would affect. This shall include an easement on the lot that will be south of Lot 19, Block 2. I the Bevel o er p decides. to final plat ar t of the preliminary C P p p ty may waive any conditi that y P the at do not apply to the final plat. The developer must complete these condi t i ons • before the City issues grading permit or approves the f' a P anal plat. Approved a setback of 99 feet for Lot 12, Block 5 and a setback of 71 feet for .Lot 13, Block 5 as shown on the at • attached Exhibit A. These setbacks are needed to save the wetland on the front of these lots. i 10 AGENDA NOAO'�� 9 Action b Coun Endorsed....... AGENDA REPORT Modified....... Pe ected........ Date TO: Cit Mana FROM: Finance Director �� RE: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLS DATE: December 4, 1995 The alarm ordinance adopted b the Council on 8-28-95 includes a, new provision that unpaid false alarm char shall be certified as special assessments. On 10-31-95 letters were sent to ever advisin them that their unpaid invoice for false alarm char would be added to their 1996 propert taxes if pa was not made b 11-30-95. Most of the invoices were paid. It is recommended that the attached resolution be approved to certif the remainin unpaid false -alarm char for collection with propert taxes pa in 1996. RESOLUTION RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County the following delinquent false alarm charges for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1995, collectible in 1996 and which includes interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) on the total amount for one year: ACCOUNT STREET ADDRESS PROPERTY AMOUNT IDENTIFICATION Builders Square Excel Cellular KFC National Management Kohls Dept. Store Maplewood All Tune & Lube Midwest Engineering 1740 Van Dyke 14- 29 -22 -33 -0001 $81.00 2225 White Bear Avenue 10- 29 -22 -44 -0029 $54.00 1938 Beam Avenue 02- 29 -22 -31 -0058 $54.00 3001 White Bear Avenue 02- 29 -22 -22 -0008 $27.00 2525 White Bear Avenue 11- 29 -22 -22 -0040 $81.00 1616 Gervais Avenue 10- 29 -22 -42 -0001 $54.00 TOTAL $351.00 PAFINANCE \WP\AGN \FALSEAL.WPD coal MEMO UM Aot i on by C o uno i 1. : To: Michael A. McGuire, City Manager From: Bruce K. Anderson, Director of Park on Endorso Sub Edgerton and Carver Staffing Mo dif � -ed- ----°--- Date: December 5, 1995 Re j eote For the December 11, 1995 City ouncil Meeting Date Y g Introduction The City of Maplewood has entered into a formal Joint Powers Agreement with both the Roseville and Maplewood School Districts for the development of community gymnasiums at Edgerton and Carver Elementary Schools. The city is responsible for providing s u p ervision and p P g p administering the community gym usage. The 1996 budget has monies allocated for hiring a Community Gym Representative at each of the respective sites. The Community Gym Rep sentatives is a paraprofessional position overseeing the facility, the community gym operations, staff, and will perform related duties, as required. Backgroun The Edgerton and Carver gymnasium facilities are scheduled to be available to the general public . i .g p beginning January 1, 1996. Our department is currently n the process of developing programs g and working to determine the specific needs and /or programs that would be desired by the community. Enclosed are copies of the gym schedule, which will be put in place for both Edgerton and Carver Elementary School facilities The two positions will be regular part-time art -time p ositions which will not exceed thirty -two hours per week. The salary will be negotiated by the Human Resource Director with the respective Union. Attached is a job description and schedule that the Edgerton and Carver facilities will be available to the general public. , It is anticipated that full programming will be in place by May 1, with extensive programs being available during the summer months. I have met with each of the principals, school administrators, PTA and PTO's to discuss the community gymnasium facilities. Each of the individuals I have met with has been very receptive and look forward to the usage of the facilities. p Recommendation Staff would recommend that the City Council authorize the hiring f two Community Gym g Y Y Representatives to serve as coordinators for the Edgerton and Carver gymnasium facilities, with the positions beginning in January 1996. JOB DESCRIPTION POSITION TITLE: COMMUNITY GYM REPRESENTATIVE ORIGINAL DATE: Nov. 1995 INCUMBENT: DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION REVISION DATE: APPROVED BY: ACCOUNTABLE TO: RECREATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR II PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Performs routine to skilled paraprofessional work overseeing and facilitating community gym operations and staff; performs related duties as required. SUPERVISION RECEIVED Works under the general and technical supervision of the Recreation Program Coordinator Il. SUPERVISION EXERCISED Provides direction and oversight to temporary and seasonal employees working at a Community gym. MAJOR AREAS OF ACCOUNTABILITY * 1. Acts as a leadworker over temporary and seasonal employees staffing the community gyms; schedules; trains; coaches; assists in hiring; recommends discipline and reward; assigns and reviews work; and approves time records. * 2. Ensures adequate staff coverage for operational hours, covers for absences. * 3. Monitors operations of facility and maintains attendance and daily user fee records. * 4. Ensures policies, procedures and building rules are followed by staff and users. 5. Performs set -up, or assists with set -up of equipment and facilities. * 6. Maintains inventory of equipment and supplies and ensures equipment is maintained and in proper working condition; recommends purchases. * 7. Sells or oversees selling of annual memberships and daily passes; maintains all related records and prepares reports as needed. 8. Assists the Recreation Program Assistants in preparing year -round community programs. 14 COMMUNITY GYM REPRESENTATIVE Page Two November 1995 MAJOR AREAS OF ACCOUNTABILITY (cont.) 9. Acts as a liaison with the school district, PTO and PTA, Community Education Advisory Council, community groups, athletic associations, etc. 10. Performs other duties as needed or assigned. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES * • Working knowledge of gym facilities, policies, procedures and rules of operations. Working knowledge of basic accounting, cash handling, inventory control and record- keeping. * • Workin g g p knowledge of sports and recreational activities suited to gymnasiums. • Working knowledge of customer service methods. * • Considerable ability to deal effectively with the public and to promote the Community gyms. * Considerable ability to hear andspeak to converse with patrons in person and by phone. Con_ y * • Considerable ability p p too operate a telephone and communicate effectively both orally and in writing. * • Considerable ability to resolve issues and concerns for facility users in a tactful, positive, manner. * • Considerable ability to maintain accurate records. • Workin g Y abilit to use large and fine motor skills and manual dexterity to set -up equipment; requiring lifting and carrying of objects weighing up to 50 pounds. • Working ability to supervise and schedule part -time and temporary staff. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS • Two Y ears of college or one year of customer service or retail experience involving regular public contact. * Note: Asterisked items are essential to the job. GYM cm STSCEEKIDULZ 1:11111 Illq \1 \ \( SCEEZID)UM TIME MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY wrHURSDAY FRIDAY SA SUNDAY 9-10 CLOSED PT FLOATER CLOS ED PT FLOATER CLOSED PT #2 CLOSED 10- 11 CLOSED PT FLOATER CLOSED PT FLOATER CLOSED PT #2 CLOSED 11-12 CLO,S'FD PT FLOATER CLOSED PT FLOATER CLOSED PT #2 CLOSED 12 -w i CLOSED PT FLOATER. CL PT F- OATER CLOSED PT #2/PERM. PT PT #1 1- 2 PT #3 PT FLOATER PERM. PT PT FL OATER Pte. PT PT #2/PERM. PT PT #1 2-3 PT #3 PT FLOATER PERM. PT PT FLOATER PERM. PT PT #2/PERM. PT PT #1 3-4 PT #3 PERK PT PE PT PE RM. PT Pte. PT #2/PERK PT PT PT #1 4.05 PT #3 PERM. PT PERM. PT PE RM. PT PT #3 PT #Z/PE1t1VI. PT PT #1 5 - 6 PT #1 PERM. PT PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #3 PEg1Vi. PT PT #1 6 PT #1 PERK PT PT #2 PERM. PT P PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 7 - g PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PE PT PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 9-9 PT #1 PE1i111i. PT PT #2 PERM. PT PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 9-10 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PERM. PT PT #3 CLOMD CLOSED PERM. pAR T Q. S HOM FART -'. #1 : 12.5 HOB Tuesda y - 3:00 to 10 :30 = 7.5 rs. Monday - 5:00 to 10:30 5.5 hrs. Wednesda y - 1 :00 to 6 :00 = 5 hrs. Sunday. 11 :30 to 6:30 = 7 firs. Thursda y - 3 :00 to 10 :30 = 7.5 hrs. . Friday - 12 :00 to 4 :00 = 4 hrs. RART -TMW F"L A ; R: 1HQURS, Saturday - 12 :00 to 6:30 = 6.5 hrs. Tuesday 40 8:30 to 3:00 = 6.5 hrs. Thursday - 8 :30 to 3 :00 = 6.5 hrs. oil IInt,I 1YI01 \(.1 \I -�I \II'�( I:IIi ll)i I I' TIME TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 9 -10 CIASF.� CIASED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PT #2 CLOSED 10.11 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED. PT #2 CZOSED 11.12 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PT #2 CLOSED 12 -w 1 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PT #2/PERM. PT CLOSED 1- 2 CLOSM CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PT #3/PERK PT PT #1 2-3 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PT #3/PERM. PT PT #1 3,w 4 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PT #3/PERM. PT PT #1 4.5:30 PROGRAM PROGRAM PROGRAM PROGRAM PROGRAM PT #3/PERM. PT PT #1 5-030-w6 PT *1 PERM.. PT PT #2 PERM. PT PT #3 PT #3 PT #1 6 - 7 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PERM. PT PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 7 - 8 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PERM. PT PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 8 - 9 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PERM. PT PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED HOURS !ART -TIlV� #1 • 11. HOUR PERM PA&TABO Tuesday - 5:00 to 9:30 = 4.5 hrs. Monday - S to 9:30 = 4.5 In* 6:30 = 7 hts. Tlnirsday - 5;00 to 9:30 a 4.5 hrs. Swiday - 11:30 to Friday - 5:00 to 9:30 a 4.5 hrs. Saturday • 18:00 to 5:30 = S.5 hrs. 0 Admin. 4. hrs PART -TaVIE 1 HOURS B NOiJR� Wednesday - 5:00 to 9:30 = 4.5 hrs. Saturday - 1:00 to 6:30 = S.5 hrs. Saturday - 830 to 1.00 + 4.5 hra. II)(�I I't1111�(�1�I -�I III �i CIII Ipl IM \ \`\ 11) I h � l I-Mill) TIME MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRmAY SATURDAY SUNDAY 91 CLOSF.I) CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #Z CLOSED 10-111 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #2 CLOSED 11 -12 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #2 CLOSED 12w 1 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #2/PERM. PT PT #1 1-2 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #3/PERM. PT "#I 2-3 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #3/PERM. PT PT #1 3 CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #3/PERM. PT PT #1 4.15 PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #2 PT FLOATER PT #3 PT #3/PERM. PT PT #1 S • 6 PERM. PT PERM. PT PT #Z PT FLOATER PT #3 PT #3 PT #1 6 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PT FLOATER PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 7 - 8 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PT FLOATER PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 9.19 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PT FLOATER PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED 9-10 PT #1 PERM. PT PT #2 PT FLOATER PT #3 CLOSED CLOSED PERM. PART -TEM: 30.5 HOURS_ Monday - 3 to 6 = 3 hrs. Tuesday - 3 :30 to 10:30 = 7 hrs Thursday - 8:30 to 4:00 = 7.5 hrs. Friday - 8:30 to 4 :00 = 7.5 , hrs. Saturday - 12:00 to 5:30 = 5.5 hrs. P #2: 11.5 HOURS Wednesday - 3:30 to 10:30 = 7 hrs. Saturday - 8 :30 to 1:00 = 4.5 hrs. FART -TMM # 1: 11.5 HOURS Monday - 6 to 10:30 = 4.5 hrs. Sunday - 11:30 to 6:30 = 7 hrs. FART -TEME FLOATER: 7.5 HOURS Wednesday - 4 :00 to 10 :30 = 6.5 hrs, PART -TIME #3 12 HOURS Friday - 4:00 to 10 :30 = 6.5 hrs. Saturday • 1 :00 to 6 :30 = 5.5 hrs. G -/ MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE: City Manager Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Street and Utility Easement Vacations Mapleleaf Estates Gervais Avenue and Cypress Street November 27, 1995 Action by Council Endorse Modif i e „ Rejecte Tate INTRODUCTION Mr. Tom Gonyea of Gonyea Company is requesting that the city vacate the following street and utility easement: 1. Gervais Avenue. This street is now platted but not built west of the new Cypress Street. It is on the south end of the Mapleleaf Estates and in the city open space property. 2.. A utility easement north of Gervais Avenue. This easement runs north -south between Gervais Avenue and Brooks Court. Refer to the maps on pages 5 and 6. BACKGROUND On December 12, 1994, the city council approved the following motions for the Mapleleaf Estates project: 1. They changed the land use plan and zoning map from R -1 S (small lot sing le dwellings) and M -1 (light industrial) to R -1 (single dwellings). 2. They vacated the undeveloped street rights -of -way (Connor Avenue east of .Cypress Street, Meadow Lane, Brooks Avenue, the 16.5- foot -wide undeveloped public road and the west end of Gervais Avenue). 3. They tabled the other requests until December 19, 1994. The council discussed the options for street access and chose Cypress Street and another connection south or east of the plat. The council requested that we revise the staff recommendations accordingly and put this on the December 19 consent agenda. 4. They requested a copy of the previous Gervais Avenue feasibility study. On December 19, 1994, the city council took the following actions for the Mapleleaf Estates project: 1. Approved a cul -de -sac diameter variance for Demont Avenue. 2. Approved the east one -half of the preliminary plat. 3. Tabled the west one -half of the plat until February 13, 1995. 4. Approved increased setbacks for two lots in the plat. On February 13, 1995, the council tabled the remaining'part (the west one -half) of the Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat until June 12, 1995. 'On June 29, 1995, the city closed on the purchase of part of open space site #116. Maplewood bought 17 acres of land from Mr. Gonyea and Mr. Pillsbury. This is the area south of Forest Street, north of Keller Parkway and west of Gervais Avenue. On August 14, 1995, the city council took two actions about this plat. The council: 1. Denied the west one -half of the 1994 Mapleleaf Estates preliminary plat. The city denied this part of the plat because the city bought the property for open space. ?. Approved the revised preliminary plat (received by the city on July 24, 1995) for the Mapleleaf Estates. This approval was subject to the December 19, 1994 conditions of approval On October 9, 1995, the city council approved the Mapleleaf Estates final.plat. This plat included the Gervais Avenue right -of -way and the utility easement that the applicant now wants the city to vacate. (See the plat on page 6.) DISCUSSION The city has no plans to build Gervais Avenue west of Cypress Street. This is because the city recently bought the property for open space. The developer moved the watermain that was in the utility easement to new Cypress Street. As such., the city does not need the Gervais Avenue right -of -way west of Cypress Street or the utility easement. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 7.. This resolution vacates all of Gervais Avenue west of Cypress Street. The city should vacate this street because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build a street in this location. 3. The adjacent properties have street access. 4. The city recently bought the property west of Cypress Street for open space. B. Adopt the resolution on page 8. This resolution vacates the utility easement that is north of Gervais Avenue. The city should vacate this easement because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build utilities in this location. 3. The developer moved the watermain that was in the easement. E REFERENCE SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Houses on Brooks Court and lots on Cypress Street East: New Cypress Street South: Dental Lab across Gervais Avenue West: Maplewood Open Space property LEGAL For vacations, Chapter 412.851 of Minnesota State law states that "No such vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so..." kr /p Sec 9Aeafvaca.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Mapleleaf Estates Map 4. Street Vacation Resolution 5. Easement Vacation Resolution 3 Attachment 1 • 8 EAM EVE, • • v- o 19 • . BEAM • k'0 '• W a C 7 b W O U • �• Kohimon Z LLj oke L oke • • '_'� t' �' • : ,• KO H LMAN AVE J CO U N'TY ROAD • C uj I � cut 23 r � rOP 2 KvAR+o OR PALM CT 3 WUXC#t0T Di! .. 2 W s WObUM DR cT. W s o cr, Chi W CONNO Coy' Cr CO N OR R � 3 AVE. • CT• DEMot O W Y Q 13ROO - tv Q 12 t 4 , _ _ _ GE RVAI S AvE . •• ' SHE! t . O P COP LARK CT. w _._ ING DR. V) Ktlltr� ? � ' • �'' Lo k� / �S o < s ice > 1 CO. R < o D. u, v LAURIE Lij � ° o �` 1 LELAND W - 3 LAURIE CT. % i oar R D• c� a SAM tJ Z Z C� '�' ; } JUNCTION AVE, �' z CL BURKE C (L �4KF AVE, m Cr BURKE F C) �BERS ST � C� ) z ELDRi DGE ,w o o � � ��, �0�, � ELOR i DG E Lk rflnit BEI.M4N7 Du RsE �.VE. BELMONT AVE C 'E. SKI OOL SKILL '" AV E. ! LLI�UW K AV. K£�R SKILL MAN AVE OOD SH16 } � • W W L �,VE. • W 2 w TV m { p >- W X Q: �L i n26 LOCATION MAP /1 4 N Attachment 2 o i:o ' ' 1 4 - __ 1 3 s_'t' . M - �+- -...� � •v I 4 , - - - - '' OF% 1+;� •�) X �5) Jr O E • lob 78. 77 5 .�0 83,58 �' IOUJ 5 0 o y5 o 12.) . --- l09 _ , c ^ �0 p� 72�►7 �7.J� s r ¢� ,� �) ,) Vie) �, 7 ) . <) o 3 2 , ' ` i . .c 0 ^ _ ,'� o g J - v W ` ( 0 r 1.50 a �? 24 d l�. _ _ 7 6 ' �, 0 fl 0 ,3 lc , 4� SSA (a -) o , 01 81.89 ,g 1 • � • � G S t I �s Q) ' 7 ) 3. C) � s.�L � Lei � � zs C • AV- v- 13 �, ! 4 16 . t W l 10 0• c2 =� - �4. 7 J, 85 S I 2 Z CL z log, •� G 0 (2s) - t f Bs ROOKS C ( ) IT ��!� 20^` 19 !e ,. 2 3_ 22 2 I� MAPLELEAF ESTATES ch 10 m � 85.z Ts.89 ?3.89 205.95 M�ple-1..eaf �riv. n Theatre a to ,3 10.00 11.47ac.) r - • PROPOSED EASEMENT ° CITY OPEN SPACE VACATION CA 10 020 ;::i p /2.71 r ) ce JL do* Mwo *Aft 040 .r• ■ . ■ 1 .. ` F mot' 1 o i:o 421.97 9 90 i _ _ - - - - - L 4 - - . 7 7 ;�, . Z.- - Doc.15 9eo L / 24 iv Z�� I d AI' ! _ Rsrr96.7 _ 3 Ar 16 • h - i T 220 g, PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 5 4 . N Attachment 3 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY CASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: ti To • 5 10 10 —J L t in Ln SLING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING REAR LOT LINES AND RIGHT OF WAY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. Z , • T A 7 N89030'1 Cr E 78.89 583.63 co 78.89 C14 QO 0 04 w o PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION b f zi CITY OPEN SPACE 0 59 4-08*'20* -V 20.40 00 18 lot_ S 89047'05* W Lai —j L u l l 206.00 ! 19 YP., -W 0 S. 89° 27'06' W GERVAIS AVENUE VACATION GERVAIS 206-00 AVENUE 206 00 S 894*27'06" W ------266-00 SOUTH ONE CW SW 114 CY SE ' CW THE NW 1.,4 (K SF 9. 1, 2 9 % . R. 22 w uj 20 r LLJ j . I N89 27 06'E I cc 8 g I rl Ito S 8904"05* W — _ L _ _ —N 8 °4''05' E 132.87 -I r — . `o ff 14 1 4 Co 6 Co I L 7'05* -Y -i — N 890 47'0 1&87 ui 20 Co 10 X $-89* —.N-89*47'.05* E 132.87 20 1 r)17404ASE 1 Lu k j.; r'Ll TY I m FM.ENT L —_ EAS — — — — ra• '3 tC S 89047'05• W 211. 17 i 136.50 12 S . 89 °47'05' W UTli.i'iY EASEMENT AS 30 30 136.50 PER DOC. No. N89047'05'E 13 do 8 1 DRAINAGE 6 Ain ujii�r� N 75to-27' 4% 1 40 to S 1111947'C5' W 14 9/ 20 ° t Z , W Al 105y IN v. 0 bo. 0 1 ,, g -11\ 45 5; 'N • -N i9-Z-9 N -7 ... ti o ........ ... ............ WET LAND 4 S 89 ° W 422-0 ul) ul F X C E P T GERVAIS AVENUE MAPLELEAF ESTATES 4 :• Attachment 4 STREET VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Tom Gonyea applied for the vacation of the following- described street: That .part of Gervais Avenue as dedicated and platted in MAPLELEAF ESTATES according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota, and all that part of the highway easement according to Document No. 340010 lying within the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 29, Range 22, and all parts of Gervais Avenue lying west of of the west right -of -way line of Cypress Street extended in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 in Ramsey County Minnesota WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1.. On November 20, 1995, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this vacation. 2. On December 18, 1995, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lot 19, Block 2, Mapleleaf Estates NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described vacations for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build a street in this location. 3. The .adjacent properties have street access. 4. The city recently bought the property west of Cypress Street for open space. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1995. 7 Attachment 5 EASEMENT VACATION RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Tom Gonyea applied for the vacation of the following - described easement: The north -south easement between the north right -of -way line of Gervais Avenue and the north property line of Lot 12, Block 2, as dedicated and platted in Mapleleaf Estates in Section 9, Township 29, Range 22 WHEREAS, the history of this vacation is as follows: 1. On November 20, 1995, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this vacation. 2. On December 18, 1995, the city council hold a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent a notice. to the abutting property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Council.also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. WHEREAS, after the city approves this vacation, public interest in the property will go to the following abutting properties: Lots 12 -16, Block 2 of Mapleleaf Estates .NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described vacation for the following reasons: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build utilities in this location. 3. The developer moved the watermain that was in the easement. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 11995. MAPLEWOOD PLANNING COMMISSION N 20, 1995 7 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers 1830 County Road B East . Call to Order airman Axdahl called the meeting to order at 7. p.m. il. ROLL�ALL Commissioner Lester Axdahl Present Commissionerunn Y Brueggeman Present Commissioner Barbara Ericson Present Commissioner Loraine Fischer Present Commissioner Jack Frost Present Commissioner Kevin Kittridge Present Commissioner Dave Kopeskyr.... Present Commissioner Gary Pearson Present ' Commissioner William Rossbach' Present Commissioner Todd Sandell Absent , - Commissioner Milo Thompson 'Present III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Comm issioner Fischer moved approval of the. inutes of November 6, 1995, as submitted. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Ayes- Axdahl, Brueggeman, Ericson, Fischer, Kittrid e,`%0pesky, Pearson, Rossbach, Thompson Abstention -Fr6st The motion passed. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner R sbach asked for the addition of Item 5. c. Ri Commissio r Fischer moved approval of the agenda as amer ComDxl'ssioner Pearson seconded. Ayes –all e motion passed. V. NEW BUSINESS A. Street and Easement Vacation— Mapleleaf Estates (Gonyea Co.) Ken Roberts, associate pl anner, presented the staff report'and answered questions from the commission. Chairman Axdahl questioned where the Gervais Avenue vacation begins and ends. Mr. Roberts said only the north one -half of Gervais Avenue was dedicated and this land reverts to Lot 19; the land to the west reverts to open space. Planning Commission - Minutes of 11 -20 -95 Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which vacates Gervais Avenue west of. Cypress Street amended to include the statement "any and all additional parts of Gervais Avenue lying west of Cypress .Street are also vacated" at the end of the first paragraph (as part of the street description). The city should vacate this street because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build a street in this location. 3. The adjacent properties have street access. 4. The city recently bought the property we of Cypress Street for open space. B. Adoption of the resolution which vacates the utility ease that is north of Gervai p s Avenue. The city should vacate this easement because: 1. It is in the public interest. 2. The city has no plans to build utilities in this location. 3. The developer moved the water main that was in the easement. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes --all The motion passed. Conditional Use Permit --113 Bellwood Avenue (Osterman) Ken oberts associate planner, presented the staff report. Michael Osterman, the applican as .presen C d had no comments. • ' Commission recommend adoptio of the resolution ommissione r f ompson mo ved the Planning which a roves a c � ditional use permit for the construction of an addition he rear .(n.orth side) pp of the detached g ara g a , f .r the property at 113 Bellwood Avenue. This mit shall be subject to � the following conditions: �1 1. All construction shall follow the�lans dated October 2 995, as approved by the city. The director of community development nay approve or changes. 2. The proposed c onstruction rte must be sta ithin one year after council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend th' eadline for one year. Y � 3. The owner shall not use tage for the repair of other persons' motor vehicles or commercial or business unless the city council approves such a request. 4. The owner shall y use the garage for personal use and st 5. The city uncil shall review this permit only if a problem deg Com�sioner Frost seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. G► — oZ. MEMORANDU AGt1OIl by Council Endorse . c� TO: City Manager Modi�ie FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner Re jecte d— _ SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Date - LOCATION: 113 Bellwood Avenue DATE: November 14, 1995 INTRODUCTION Mr. Michael Osterman is requesting that the city approve a conditional use permit (CUP) for his property at 11.3 Bellwood Avenue. This permit is for an addition on the rear (north) side of the detached garage. The city code limits the amount of detached garage space on this lot to 1,000 square feet. As proposed, the garage addition would increase the detached :garage on this lot to 1,344 square feet. However, the city code allows the .council to approve a CUP to increase the garage area on a property. (See the maps on pages 5 and 6 and the letter on page 7.) DISCUSSION Mr.. Osterman wants this garage addition to store his show cars in. The proposed addition would not depreciate property values, cause crowding or adverse environmental effects. Most of the neighbors that responded to our survey were for this proposal. (See the survey comments on pages two and three and the petition on page eight.) RECOMMENDATION Approve the resolution on page 9. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for the construction of an addition on - the rear (north side) of the detached garage for the property at 113 Bellwood Avenue. This permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans dated October 25, 1995 as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be started within one year after council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The owner shall not use the garage for the repair of other persons' motor vehicles or commercial or business activities unless the city council approves such a request. 4. The owner shall only use the garage for personal use and storage. 5. The city counci shall review this permit only if a problem develops. CITIZEN COMMENTS Staff surveyed the property owners within 350 feet of this site to get their opinions of this proposal. Out of 54 properties, we received 33 responses. Twenty three were for the proposal, three were against and seven had no comment. l For 1. I see no reason for concern. (Paulson - 107 Bellwood Avenue) 2. I see no problem with the extra space. (Krings -112 Bellwood Avenue) 3. Everything this guy does always looks good. I like his plan. Let the guy do it. (Thumer - 120 Bellwood Avenue) 4. Mike is a great neighbor and the addition would not hurt anything (Jirik - 121 Bellwood) 5. I have no objection. He is a good neighbor and plans to use it for storage. (Lang - 128 Bellwood Avenue) 6. It improves the value of their property. (Wirth - 135 Bellwood Avenue) 7. He .always has everything nice and neat around his house and the addition won't bother anyone. (Murphy - 142 Bellwood Avenue) 8. It will be better to have his cars in a safe place and he won't have to have them in his driveway to make his place look junky. (McConnell - 143 Bellwood Avenue) 9. Mr. Osterman should have the right to use his property as he sees fit if he is not creating an environmental problem. (Tessman - 1867 Jackson Street) 10. His reasons for wanting the addition are very legitimate. (Wilkerson - 1879 Jackson Street) 11. The extra garage space is always nice, no problem to the neighborhood. Let Mike build this since it is not really visible by the street. He always does projects first class and never a problem. (Duellman -1 Jackson Street) 12. It will make the neighborhood look neater. Also familiar with the property as relatives previously owned this house. (Christianson - 129 Summer Avenue) 13. It is his hobby. (Macoskey -106 Roselawn Avenue) 14. He is a good neighbor to us. (Strantz - 112 Roselawn Avenue) 15. I do not know of any reason why it should not happen. (Brown -124 Roselawn Avenue) 16. I am for it 100 percent because this man is very honest and does follow the law. He just wants to store his cars for the winter. (Hammer - 128 Roselawn Avenue) 17. They are good neighbors and the garage will not be a problem. (Weldon - 134 Roselawn) 18. I see nothing wrong with a large garage -let him have it. (Gritz -1888 Beaumont Street) 2 19. It really does not affect me and I do not feel it will harm the value of homes close to this proposal. (Saugstad - 112 Downs Avenue) Against 1. Anybody that wants a garage this big should move to a commercial site. (Miller - 142 Roselawn Avenue) 2. It will lower the value of all our houses. Keep the size under the code. (Berry - 1.50 Roselawn Avenue) 3. In the future he will have junk and cars all over the place. (Sass - 1870 Jackson Street) REFERENCE SITE DESCRIPTION Site Size: 10,440 square feet (0.24 acres) Existing Land Use: single dwelling and detached garage SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Houses on Roselawn Avenue East: Houses on Bellwood Avenue South: Houses across Bellwood Avenue West: House at 107 Bellwood Avenue ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT Section 36 -77(c) allows the city council to approve a conditional use permit to increase the height or area of an accessory building. CRITERIA FOR CUP APPROVAL Section 36- 442(a) states that the city council may approve a CUP, based on nine standards. (See findings 1 -9 in the resolution on pages 9 and 10.) kr /p: Sec 18 /113bllwd.mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Site Plan 4. 10 -24 -95 letter from Michael Osterman 5. Petition 6. CUP Resolution 3 Attachment 1 r. X11, 58 LrrME iw.r�s .• 0 • .t . .._. • ;.. 't L*Ajft IE RD. o •�' W g • t >•- • r / C W • COUNTY RD. 8 � � a 25 • • a . � � • CL RIDGE AV E. o _.. sand • Lake BE UGNT LA. E 0 • �• t • • t!Y ' A W •, , • . t. CA SKI�L)4m SKILU PF SKILLMAN AVE. Y S8 a: • • ` Ji NIT. VVV44N cn CL r-MW%k M • • 1/ • AVE. W MT. VMN N AV z • i ' `.J p -� � �'"� lam# � (L � C? • N �rir • � ELLWO /►v'E. 8E11, o 26 AVE. BELLWOf t • • o 0 - SUMIAER vE. a a SU t i r. ER "n' • • FEIVroN cr W RJPL,EY m • o r V • cn A VE. • �, RIP LEY AVE. ' KINGSTON ' Qr m KIN GSTON < AVE. • U W W •. t1 0 O AVE. W PRICE Z AVE. c.Rr E R A VE• a Co Nov W -- 51 S 49 1! P .LOCATION MA Q N Attachment 2 a r�s s• � I 1 LO is tlo r7 1' 22, '.3 . -� -7 3 .. .. .. 80 ' . ..... 681 15•'14.3' ro to IK !! 14 !3 Ic 11 10 °� 8 N 5 4 3 8fi 94, 1Ofi - 112 120 128 # 134 S 'T I 1 Nt - 4 K � 1i I E r L - .. t .. E!o � .- � b r � C) 6 1901 �,.. , T F ,107 '� 121 129 ' 135 tt to 4 8 . ..:::: .. .. ..I.. I.. { �►` 895 - ---- -- �- o C8� 1887 • }— .. ---- - W 4 (46) (4S) I ( 44) (43� (4Z { 41) IL4 (3 9 0 ( ( � ( U o0 112 1 1201 ��- I t 3 0 1879 I r I to 4 1— 4 y I i I I 1 w ( 1 0 )10 �` Z 1873 '. O t . r I Y � ` � 1 i � 12 12 , 7 T- r 113 1 c� 1 9 13 5 At 0)) 8s - Sri ., 12 . — SUMMER- • 3 _ � ' ' •• , 'T5 7G,3 DOWNS Alp Sao 80, SO- 2.3 ��: Zl N t4 13 !O s 1 8 7 �o i 4 5 (2 8) 9� •G r 80' a s' 9s 5 . 89.95' go� 1 tt 13 ,�} i N y, �R• gyp• O � (j 03) R = to �a - .o' ' (8)) o 33 t - � 1.3 (67 0 5 •4 3 ---� - = (100) 12 3 4) 1 s c O ) F414)14 (4 3 �� I � (Iob) . 200 q o r (Ila� p 9j K ( 83) - - 8 , 1 3e •—� r IZV 3707 ?1 so .a - - so �� N - �� 7 ti �'•� .�/ �: _ ,� • (1 17) C. X �► ° 6 ) �' s '' ;' ' v� fte i ( 3 5 50 ` CD 3 ' 1 *4 4 4)-o i C ! t of St . Pav �. ,44' 4 o , 233` , -= =fin =�li3) Paz' ° 4 w v' 1 53 (- ►2 tio. a 35 PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP 4. N 5 Attachment 3 SITE PLAN /G-Z� -- �� 4 I cc C. �� PROPOSED ADDITION I BELLWOOD swap Attachment 4 C) �\ �7tti �"::i o tit T o 1� t E C f� Z s z a.� . Z=7. tLL E- I'J 0 /A MiZ LA,) jj to Z 70" S J (.Owl �.� rr) y C.. t�� C4111 r'-4f °t�lf;W6 ' Ar 23 Vic w f Afto- ol) �.� 0-7-l"ota/ 13 e /fig / �� rn G ' �a 6 � lolool f L I 11C Attachment 5 .00flO o o q ot =T O F- -ore oll 5TH rv'-%A *J 4S. i'z A GG- o x �c,.� �� '��t� r'-4f °t�lf;W6 ' Ar 23 Vic w f Afto- ol) �.� 0-7-l"ota/ 13 e /fig / �� rn G ' �a 6 � lolool f L Attachment 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Michael Osterman is requesting that Maplewood approve a conditional use permit to put an addition on the rear (north side) of his detached garage on his property at 113 Bellwood Avenue. WHEREAS, this permit applies to the property at 113 Bellwood Avenue. The legal description is: Lot 15, Block 4, De Mars Third Addition in Section 18, Township 29, Range 22. (PIN 18 -29 22-42 -0018) WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 20, 1995, the planning commission. recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. On December 18, 1995, the city council held a public hearing. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit based on the building and site plans. The city approves this permit because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in co nformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4.. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. �r 9. The use would cause- minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the plans dated October 25, 1995 . as approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be started within one. year after council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The owner shall not use the garage for the repair of other persons' motor vehicles, commercial or business activities unless the city council approves such a request. 4. The owner shall only use the garage for personal use and storage. 5. The city council shall review this permit only if a problem develops. The Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on December 18, 1995. 10 Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 11 -20 -95 e Rossbach moved the .Planning Commission recommend: A. A Lion of the resolution which vacates Gervais Avenue west of Cypress Stre amended t includ .. � YP o e statement any and all additional parts of Gervais Avenue lying st of Cypress Street are o vacated" at the end of the first paragraph (as' part . of the reet descrip p ) The city shoul Cate this street because: 1. It is in the public in st. 2. The city has no plans t uild a street in this locat' 3. The adjacent properties ha treet access. 4. The city recently bought the :pro rty we f Cypress Street for open space. B. Adoption of the resolution which va es th tiiity easement that is north of Gervais Avenue. The city should vacate this eas e nt because: 1. It is in the public i est. 2. The city has n laps to build utilities in this location. 3. The deve er moved the water main that was in the easem Commi�*eer Pearson seconded. Ayes –a motion passed. B. Conditional Use Permit -113 Bellwood Avenue (Osterman) Ken Roberts, associate planner, presented the staff report. Michael Osterman, the applicant, was present and had no comments. pp Commissioner Thompson moved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for the construction of an addition on the rear north side of the detached garage for the property at 113 Bellwood Avenue. This permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall foll the plans dated October 25, 1995, as approved b the city. The Y Y director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be started within one ear after council y c approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The owner shall not use the garage for the repair of other persons' motor vehicles or commercial or business activities unless the city council approves such a request. 4. The owner shall only use the garage for personal use and storage. 5. The city council shall review this permit only if a problem develops. Commissioner Frost seconded. Ke Ayes –all The motion passed. G -3 Action by Counail 0. MEMORANDUM Endorse Rejecte TO: City Manager Date FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Change and Preliminary Plat - Grandview Addition LOCATION: North of Carver Avenue, West of Sterling Street DATE: December 5, 1995 INTRODUCTION The city council directed the planning commission and parks and recreation commission to review the purchase of a property for open space. Maplewood's Open Space Committee called this site 168C. It is a 13.3 -acre property north of Carver Avenue, west of Sterling Street. The city had considered the Grandview preliminary plat for the site earlier in 1995. (See the maps on pages 5 and 6.) City staff has negotiated a price of about $120,000 for the 13.3 acres. State law requires that the planning commission advise the council whether proposed public acquisitions follow the comprehensive plan. Maplewood has not shown this site on the land use plan for open space. As such, we have scheduled a public hearing to consider changing the land use plan for this area. The changes would be from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). (See the existing and proposed land use plan maps on pages 7 and 8.) BACKGROUND Plat History On May 14, 1990, the city council considered a preliminary plat for 33 single - dwelling lots for this site. (See the 1990 developer's proposed plat on page 11.) The council tabled the item until the June 11, 1990 meeting to give the developer a chance to meet with the neighbors. On June 11, 1990, the city council approved the 30 -lot Mark's Nature Haven preliminary plat, subject to nine conditions (See the approved 1990 preliminary plat on page 10.) On June 24, 1991 and July 13, 1992, the council approved one -year time extensions for the preliminary plat, subject to the June 11, 1990 conditions. On December 20, 1993, the planning commission considered a one -year time extension for the preliminary plat, subject to revised conditions. The commission tabled this time extension for 30-60 days. The commission wanted to give the developer and a neighbor a chance to agree on a plan. On .February 28, 1994, the city council ended the Waterford Addition (Mark's Nature Haven) preliminary plat approval because: 1. Government regulations and policies had changed significantly since the city first approved this preliminary plat. 2. More than three years had passed since the city held a public hearing on this plat. There may be new neighbors near the plat site. They should have a chance to comment on the plans to develop this property. 3. There has been no physical activity to develop this plat. 4. Heritage Development, the current developer of the site, withdrew their request for a time extension for the project. On June 26, 1995, the city council tabled until July 24, 1995 a decision about the proposed Grandview Addition preliminary plat for this site. The council wanted more information about the grading plan and a tree plan. (See the 1995 proposed plat on page 9.) On July 24, 1995, the council tabled until August 28, 1995 a decision about the proposed Grandview Addition. The developer had asked the city to table the decision about the plat to allow them more time to review the grading plan. On August 28, 1995, the council tabled the Grandview Addition preliminary plat until the developer requests action or December 11, 1995, whichever comes first. Open Space Program Can November 2, 1993, the voters approved the open space referendum. This vote authorized the city to sell up to $5 million in general obligation bonds to buy land for open space. The Open Space Committee recommended that the city council consider buying open space from .a list of nineteen sites. This list included the fourteen top -rated sites in Maplewood and. five additional sites that the committee has rated top in their respective neighborhoods, but not city- wide. Since then, the city has narrowed this list to eight properties. (See the list on page 12 and the map on page 13.) These are the properties that the owners have expressed an interest in selling. The city council authorized the staff to buy six of these sites. These include Site 153A (Priory), Site 142 (Frost Avenue and English Street), Site 161 B (Kayser), Site 108 (Pearson), part of Site 116 (Spoon Lake) and Site 103C (County Road D and Woodlynn). Maplewood has closed on all these sites. In September 1995, the owners of the Grandview Addition property contacted city staff about possibly buying their site for open space purposes. On October 2, 1995, the city council directed staff to pursue negotiations with the owners of the Grandview Addition site and two adjacent properties for open space. On November 20, 1995, the parks and recreation commission reviewed this site. The commission recommended 4 to 1 (with 2 abstensions) that the city buy this site for open space, based on the following advantages: - 1. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, including wetlands, slopes and trees. -- - 2 2. The property is a good economic value. 3. There is safe and easy access to the area. 4. There has been strong neighborhood interest in preserving the site. The parks commission also requested that the city prepare a prioritized list of the remaining parcels that the city is considering buying for open space. DISCUSSION Open Space The Open Space Committee ranked this site 28th out of the 87 and 9th out of the 19 in this neighborhood. This site has several advantages: • The site provides an interesting vista • There are wetlands, slopes and trees on and near the site that would be. protected • The property is a good economic value • There is safe and easy access to the area The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities • There has been strong neighborhood interest in preserving the site Staff (estimates that the cost to buy the top eight sites is about $5,200,000. There is about $4.7 million to spend on property. As such, the city might not have enough money to buy all of the top sites. Staff will complete the list and the size of the sites after completing the negotiations with all the property owners. Property to East If the city buys Site 168C for open space, it will affect how the 15 -acre property to the east might develop. This is because the city planned to extend Schadt Drive (with utilities) from Sterling Street west across this property to connect with proposed Crestview Dive. Maplewood also planned to eliminate Sterling Street between Schadt Drive and Carver Avenue after the new streets were built. The city should try to buy part or all of the 15 -acre property between Sterling Street and Site 168C if the city decides to buy site 168C. This would eliminate the difficulties in developing the 15 -acre site and would create a larger, more valuable open space. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 17. This resolution changes the land use plan for the area north of Carver Avenue west of Sterling Street. The change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). The city should make this change because: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The site provides an interesting vista. 3 3. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, including wetlands, slopes and trees. 4. The property is a good economic value. 5. There is safe and easy access to the area. 6. The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities. 7. There has been strong neighborhood interest in preserving the site. The city shall not make these changes until the city closes on the property. B. Deny the Grandview preliminary plat (received by the city on July 14, 1995.) The city should deny this plat because the city plans to buy this property for open space. The city should not take this action until after the city closes on the property. p:sec24-28/open Ian 8. mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Property Line/Zoning Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Proposed Land Use Map 5. Proposed Grandview Preliminary Plat 6. 1990 Proposed Plat (30 Lots) 7. 1990 Developer's Plat (33 Lots) 8. List of Top -Rated Sites 9. Map of Top -Rated Sites 10. 11 -13 -95 memo from Craig Dawson 11. Land Use Plan Change Resolution 4 AGENDA NO. AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: Assistant City Manager RE: Authorize Acquisition of 2413 Carver Avenue DATE: December 11, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute documents to purchase property at 2413 Carver Avenue for open space purposes. The purchase would be subject to completion of an environmental assessment, the findings of which would be acceptable to the City. Funding for the purchase would come from the Open Space Land Acquisition Fund. INTRODUCTION In a letter dated September 12, 1995, the owner of property at 2413 Carver Avenue proposed that the City purchase the 13.33 acres of land for open space purposes for $120,000. On October 2 1995 the City Council directed staff to begin activity to acquire this property. Council also directed that staff pursue acquisition of two adjoining properties - -one immediately east, the other on the southwest - -if the owners were willing to sell them. APPRAISALS & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The appraisal performed by Bettendorf Roher Knoche Wall, Inc., concluded the market value of the property was $125,000. The review appraisal by Donald A. Hennessey, CRA, certified this conclusion. Braun Intertec is performing an environmental assessment of the property. It will include an investigation for asbestos in the buildings on the site which will be demolished. This work is expected to be done b p Y December 15. Closing on the property should be made subject to City review of the report, and a determination that any environmental risks identified are acceptable to the City. The owner will demolish the buildings and properly abandon all wells on the site. COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed this matter on November 20, 1995, and recommended acquisition on a 4 -1 -2 vote. It commented that the City should look at acquiring smaller sites to convey a sense of openness throughout the community as few large parcels remain available. The Plannin Commission considered this proposal on December 4, 1995, and unanimously recommended that the City acquire the property. It also encouraged the City to pursue acquisition of the two adjoining parcels. CLOSING The property owner has requested a closing by the end of the year. Staff is working to meet this request. Attachment 1 FrA 1 • y •• • • • A • j :ti .. 494 . • t Co rver• Lake U. • 0 g• •. 00 c. o f 0 o • • AVM. 0 43 •• • - c oVERLO . ., CIR. o <1 > .. ..� c1c • go • •H r • {•. • cc go • . •.. • 4b 0 " SEY CCU •••• • • •• • • •,• 1% • • • , •. + ♦ •• • • • • • • • • • • • / • • • • • . • • • • • •• • • • •. •• I • • • • • • • .• •� • ft� • i� • • • • ••• •• _ • N COUN7Y • • • C`I� C V • • lie • • 17 0 . :••• • mm �. TYL • • PHyus Clot i . CURRIE CT. • ''� • v • 2. VALLEY YIEWCT• vi 3 i 30. LAKEW00o cT. .. 2 i HKA4Wt 74 r y. f 0 4 ' � N�EarirtZ � • � Y ' 0AK ME 5i ' CT. ' MORELAND •� • • Clo CT • 5� • .. 8 0 AV. LOCATION MAP 5 Q N Attachment 2 N 17 : ` • (r + I�B 1 1Q ( 791 12 I IO o 6 �/ i 13 r A 3 N ot p „� t - �. �� . b ti N p y •4p } �° fJ r., 60 t �. . -. ; 0' v J . �s ~ , 7� y , , vy.`�y. (24 25 V� �1 8 s 1iy 12 +, i e 1 .AND �� °Lf4fV " , t'4� m �/I E 0 >. 1 < J D, Alm ��.� .� i3 13�g,,) 0,'�1 c.3� X f f.. , Zj '�S� j ^ '+ oy 2 o ► 'V a <', + R �I `o e . �' , " p . I ^' 1 .8 77:99 s ,,� v 1cor) 0 (57) � �,� 4 1 I (ij' '� (�a) P , f ., 7 ° a "� 1 1 ^ Ld �' s w '�: J a Z1, '� (� Zj ^ ' ' I s o h oOQi r4o c, o lw Q1 q t- - -- (0 r 2 16 ; 19 15 a 14 a � 9. i k (bZ} O (58) 7 ir q J 10 + 9) o ' �2 Z/ • r ry �5 �j3 r 28 S2 a v r� 2 0} o �� QJ J dR 2 7 Zi. 3 a 2 n s . - �ti ; 5 s'' , a tiQ r; /3 I 1 p n S v s •i �/ . s t r 24 25 o 26 4 0 % (41) 17 za ,�u `,' 9 ! V Q t 5 L < �� 6 fa �� 11 0 �•ib.5e ,33 Ss ,d ` I.' t2f) �, �,d? o � 3_• r �o S °. a. j 5 ^ �4 °� > N q m (-",' S �a ao `° �zj•S[ �` 13 -1 .0. h • , 20 �' 1 9 9v 90.0(0 12• °' ° .� 'r. m" h L " .• �h 10 _ V S H O E D (35) 61 h _ ; 9� a s '� X 74 N. (38) -' 9 c 4 5 8 or 114 1, G�P�S �gZ� �43} e ° 15 3..:. r o ( V �3 �� N (3 7� 8 c' (o b 5 �j `2 �' J l-� ! 2,0 I. �' '' r ■ 1 D D T 6 '', 7 f53.o7 ( ..'l� ' 6 /'. �� e > �• B�.ot (4!� r; �••`S �y ��/ ' 1 -� '. f 95 J5 02 �+ X9 6 (loS� 10 � ti s'3< tit °` 5 . 37 _k' 1 u r �r' •� 8 'MOD ajor J�, �� X9 9 \ .p %3y 1v 4 4 3:, v • i S s r,o _ �,� , z 3 r H G L - A N S ry 04 F. 1 ry k 10 4 ^1 Ell i0w 12 1 .� Ili \' 20 5 dR tle 1'9 .3'/ 4V 1 i : r, �, I 1 2 1 I 437 73cr 8_ ac . 0 I: _ 27 >;B I � o O I - ,.,o r ' - •,- 2 2 3 8� ac S � 1 1 • ,r2 - 6 IS l :d r T / •�9z 33 , .30 ac r ... SO / b .... ...... -/ r _ O 2 7' .... l 72.3 5.�� •�7.'.. 1 • , o .....:..... ;: ;:.:.:.; ti ... . .. 7.� 1 Z 5 4O '� • ' • ' • : • : • : • : % . • . .. b} to p i p e (, t e,..,t +! 1r� �'•'•':'•• •••••• q ILI o •. ❖:•:•::::� %y:% :::tip.::•:::::::: %:::•:•:�.•:� •' 0 ^ O S f 1285 1 yea .•% I i • d. • i :•:•:•: •:• 0 . G d C _ �. :iii : X •:•:. • `•`• �' r J .;:;:;:::5::::: V . A,•;,• •,•,•,•.•,•,•, IftfA fr;:fi f..•:•.. ::.:vf.•.•.•.•.• :.: .. Zb Ct 0 TO (j • fi r. •. • ,.,.. ..•..•.•...•....,.,.a•.•.•.;.•. ... 2371 .;?; r::::%. 'r'r:•:•:::•:•:�.•:•:•:•:•'r:.. ..... .... 2445 . •y . . • 4 • ~ ... - c: 'ice {{ _ E C .,% � _ _ _ .00 CARVER AVENUE N 1 0 $ (L 5) :ov o � O / r ! 2460 r w 4t .A W E R 4 1 eof8a� 11 2410 N G 51a) Z S + '9 � k� �ws� a � � + b.,cr� � p. pt I�wc D �• � �'• � �d I � I at � - if 96 (37" S4S 72�� .� =1 GO'JfhT� `r RAMS b� (Z4•j or tt 6Lett t � j•�I PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP 0 Q N Attachment 3 HIGHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 12 (EXISTING) N Figure 21 a :W } 1 major collector i Linwood .�- R -1 a� r OS R -1 o . - os I P E d .W 'c� M EAR as i Ao 1 �o s o R -1 > VJ minor �� o rft� cT 4 �.. R 1— 1 r ' j C jq-rlco no ollect r Highwood- j f 6C I ,- o o R � 1 i ...� 01 G Os .E minor j collector _ cr Sk CC Carver M =pill REVISED R~ " a I 7 -20 -95 r os I o I V 0 I � os �- i I I i i HIGHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 12 (EXISTING) N Figure 21 I� I maj or • - • ••• 1 I i i• i f f f r t r f 1 f 1 f 1 f • • ■ •, ` f • HIGHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 12 (PROPOSED) N Figure 21 O i .�. . co OS R -1 b- .o O S P ., 40 C to '00 minor � � � ♦ - _ _ _ R -1 O S Q i c1 . D . 1 , >% ` -40 g I� J collect r ; m no ollect r_ fJ Highwood- $C o R -1 i ( '�' .0 t; j .� .. z V O O Im R 0 p E � o s i .5 minor f� ffi> fa f� ffa ffil ! collector R I , . � ; r ■w ffa ffi> fffl fffi ffa � � � � � 0S I R- 1 ZF IT ,CO Carver colie C .o ' , REVISED i \ i " r- 7-20-95 I os .. .. i - I 0 V I � ' 1 I � L C� I 1 os 1 1 HIGHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 12 (PROPOSED) N Figure 21 f Attachment 5 M r r r a r N r V w v w - i � w Ir w w f i t • � a . a w Q � w • 1 { 1 j � 1 1 � 1 O 1 _ 1 1 { r i 1995 PROPOSED PLAT Attachment 6 r, C s r � ; _ C - 12.1 31 cr 46 pr M Y . 3. 41 An in �D— :E C co w m 100 fn Z 1 S11M E--r M t4 C CO[le BOXWOOD AVENUE W4 0 CA . I I -- L I - A v E vj u F— ol I � 0 � �� i� ��i�*� a �� r► vN — r C fq -n it t`"�1� *^ Irk �� ' � �' M -�* ��p� � � it .1, v 0 %o 13903 PRELIMINARY PLAT i---If; Attachment 7 r ^ 1 3 j flp j st 6 ax � Sb ' o D �v - t n �C � r _ 1 1 £C t •3 fn Nt J. ��...... ��.r• ,. in Q s r • I Z •� 1 u � .rte- .. ' �.� .�.r. �.�� •sue w....... --- -�.� �� w �� . �� ..�� -.�� -� CARVER AVEt►.IUE ��- p � ��• � �� • !fir f t� �r ? l - .3 IF • =•A iFf 3�� . is : [. •� �.___ _p _"_' •3, S .� :�1z� � _ ;fat ;z� r � i � �i;ei � � L � sE ZI• :: � E F 's j ' �! 4 0 toe I tIf f l opogo / (-T3� lois-) 11 i j �• 1 j / ' TOP OPEN SPACE SITES FROM THE OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDED OPEN SPACE LIST Open Space Ranki City I D# X67 Sites 153A 1 151 6 142 6 1616 6 108 9 159A 9 116 13 116 13 103C 57 Propertv Location–Owner Priory Acres Estimated Cost 39 $1,205 East of Rice, South of B- Zittei & Oren 19 (Note: Maplewood received a 7 -acre conservation easement with the Tri- District School on this site) English and Frost 24 South of Linwood Ave., East of Sterling St.- 20* Kayser Hazelwood and Beam — Pearson 8 Lower Afton and McKnight - Johnson 25 (Note: The owner is considering developing this property.) Near Spoon Lake-- Gonyea & Pillsbury 17 Near Spoon Lake - Addl. acreage 11 Between County Road D and Woodlynn 23 $808,000 $416,500 $221,000 $408 $265 $663,000 $4,000,000 (est.) Note: If the city was able to buy all these properties, the total price would be about $5,200,000. * !Does not include 8 acres for a neighborhood park 12 Attachment 9 Maplewood OPEN SPACE Top Rated Areas THE TOP SITES ARE CIRCLED 13 Attachment 10 MEMORANDUM TO: Mike McGuire, City Manager FROM: Craig Dawson, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 13, 1995 RE: Status/Disposition of Recommended Open Space Acquisitions At the November 6 Council/Manager Workshop, councilmembers requested a recap on what has happened properties recommended for open space acquisition. They wanted to know that good faith pP to p p P efforts had been made, to negotiate .on these properties before devoting staff resources to acquire properties not on the recommended list. -ro What follows is a brief summary of the City's experience with each of the parcels as recommended by the Open Space Committee. Acres Rank ID No. Nhood Prolle!U Name/Description Status/Disposition 11 1 160 12 Gervais Outlots E. F, & G Owner did not wish to sell; S. of Linwood Ave. E. of Linwood Ct. is now Bud Kolby 4th Addn (14 single - family res. lots) 28 1 153A 8 Priory Property Acquired; closed on 2/15/95 SW Cor. Larpenteur & Century for $1,205,600 30 3 15 3 B 8 High S chool/Oak Ridge second phase Owner did not wish to sell & N. of C &N RR, E. of Wms. pipeline City acquired nearby 153A; now being developed as single- family residential 32 3 132 8 Maple Wood Estates 2nd Addn. Owner did not wish to sell; S. of Ripley @Myrtle, W. of Sterling now being developed as single - family residential 31 5 156 9 Schreier 5 acres developed as S. of Maryland, E. of Lakewood Dr. Rosewood retirement community; owner is marketing balance of property 39 6 151 1 Tri- District School 7 -acre conservation S. of Co. Rd. B. W. of Soo Line RR easement given for $ 0 14 Acres � n Na. Nhood Pro a Name/Descri tion Status/Disposition 24 6 142 7 SW Cor. of Frost & English Acquired; closed on 12 -1 -94 for $808,300 26 6 161E 12 Kayser Y Partially acquired; closed on S. of Linwood, E. of Sterling 16 acres east of Sterling on 5/24/95 for $416,500. Negotiations suspended on remainder at request of owner 8 9 108 4 Pearson Acquired; closed on 6/29/95 SW Cor. of Hazelwood & Beam for $221,000 25 9 159A 11 A. Johnson Townhouse development SE Cor. McKnight & Lower Afton Rd. denied; new development proposal in process 12 9 1598 11 Williams P i p eline p Owner did not wish to sell; S. of Lower Afton, E. of Site 159A City discontinued pursuit receiving owner's initial price 69 9 161A 12 Ka ser /Johnson Y Site being developed as W. of Sterling, N. of Highwood Amber Hills; will have approx 90 single - family res. lots 28 13 116 3 Kuslich/Gon Y ea/Pillsbury Property Partially acquired; closed N. of Spoon Lake, E. of Arcade on 17 westerly acres on 6/29/95 for $ Council approved acquisition of remaining 11 acres w/Kuslich; closing negotiations are in progress. 15 13 161C 12 Jirovec /Johnson Site being developed as S. of Linwood E. of Sterlin g Amber Hills 5th Addition; will have 30 single - family residential lots Other Top -Rated Properties in Remaining Neighborhoods 1 2 MnDOT /Gilbert property, - Price well in excess of -value btwn McMenemy & 3 5E 3 148 2 N. of Gateway Trail, W. of Arcade Should pursue conservation easements 15 A cres' Rank ID No. Nhood Pro a me/Descri tion Status/Disposition Woodl E. of Ariel 23 .103C 5 Btwn Co. Rd. D & yn, closed in April 9 1995 for $663,300. 2 140 6 RRs Intersection Council decided in 12/94 no N. of Gateway Trail, E. of English to buy; now being developed as four single- family res. lots by Mr. Long through administrative subdivision 2040 173 13 BonselUHaller property Council considered concept E. of Sterling, N: of limit w/Newport proposal on 11/6/95; asked owner to present firm proposal Other Opportunities Considered 13 -33 28 168C 12 Grandview Addition area Council authorized N. of Carver, W. of Sterling negotiations; appraisals underway; sites are nearby Site 173 7 NR g p _ - -- 3 Re nier /RJR Development property Owner inquired about City's E. of Arcade N. of Keller Parkway interest; on 11/6/95, Council requested a firm proposal from owner 16 Attachment 11 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development .proposed a change to the city's land use plan from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). WHEREAS, this change applies to the property located north of Carver Avenue west of Sterling Street formerly known as 2413 Carver Avenue. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. On December 4, 1995, the planning commission held a public hearing. The city staff published a hearing notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the plan amendment. 2. On December 11, 1995, the city council discussed the land use plan change. They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described change for the following reasons: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The site provides an interesting vista. 3. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, including wetlands, slopes and trees. 4. The property is good economic value. 5. There is safe and easy access to the area. 6. The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities. 7. There has been strong neighborhood interest in preserving the site. The city shall not make this change until the city closes on the property. The. Maplewood City Council adopted this resolution on 1 1995. 17 Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 12 -04 -95 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Land Use Plan Change —Open Space Site 168C (2413 Carver Avenue) (Grandview Addition) Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. Craig Dawson, assistant city manager, told the commission that there was approximately $1.2 million remaining in bond proceeds to buy open space land. Commissioner Fischer inquired about the availability of the property near Rosewood Estate in the Beaver Lake area. Mr. Dawson said the owner of this parcel is aware of the city's interest but preferred to market his land privately. Commissioner Frost questioned the city's recommendation to buy the property to the east. City Engineer Ken Haider said a previous feasibility study determined the best outlet for Schadt Drive, because of topography and grade problems, was to come through the Grandview property. If the city purchases Site 168C for open space, it would be necessary to consider other options for this parcel to the east. Commissioner Fischer was concerned about access to the back portion of 2405 Carver, if the city purchases the Grandview Addition for open space, and asked if the city has an obligation to provide access. Mr. Haider said additional costs to develop certain parcels, because of open space acquisition, might be a factor for the city council to consider. Mr. Roberts listed the various open space sites that have been approved and the cost of each. Chairperson Axdahl asked for comments from the public. Merrill Paulson, with New Image Builders (the developer of the property to the north of the Grandview site) said he is now working to develop the property to the east of this parcel. Mr. Paulson said he paid the $10,000 feasibility fee for the realignment study of Sterling Street. It was his understanding that he would be reimbursed for this cost by the developers of these two sites. He said, if this open space purchase transpires, it may be necessary for them to realign Sterling Street at a cost of $304,900 (1988) or ask the city to let it remain as is. Mr. Paulson requested the commission table this item until a decision has been made for the future of Sterling Street. Louie Hoffman, 2398 Schadt Drive East, presented a list of signatures from people on Schadt Drive in favor of open space. Steve Bonfig, 2390 Schadt Drive East, said the value of the land to the community should be considered. Joan Singer (1250 Dorland Road), Arnie Kaiser (2406 Schadt Drive E.), Mrs. Hoffman (2398 Schadt Drive E.), Art Snyder (2430 Schadt Drive E.), Mark Malluege (1288 Dorland Road S.) spoke in favor of the proposal. Rick Parker, Arcon Development, suggested the plat be revoked at the same time the city closes on the property. Beverly Stielow, the owner of the property to the east, had no problem with open space but was concerned with protecting her own interest. Mr. Dawson said the city was open to a process that would arrive at a fair price for buying Ms. Stielow's property for additional open space. Since there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Kittridge asked if there were sufficient funds to purchase Ms. Stielow's 15 acres. Mr. Dawson said this property should be affordable and one the city would like to combine with the Grandview property. Commissioner Kittridge commented about the desirability of connecting together pieces of open space. Commissioner Rossbach said it was a good time, because of all the attempted development efforts, to buy this property, and he felt it was a bargain. He also recommended that an effort be made to purchase the property to the east. Mr. Rossbach also wanted to point out that the open space acquisitions in the northern portion of the city were fairly evenly distributed. He further indicated that Maplewood had not obtained much open space in Planning Commission -3- Minutes of 12 -04 -95 the southern "leg" of the city.. He felt this purchase would help distribute the open space evenly. Commissioner Thompson mentioned the lack of open space acquired in the western section of Maplewood. Commissioner Kittridge moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which changes the land use plan for the area north of Carver Avenue west of Sterling Street. The change is from R -1 (single dwellings) to OS (open space). The city should make this change because: 1. Maplewood plans to buy this site for open space. 2. The site provides an interesting vista. 3. The purchase would help preserve a variety of natural features on and near this site, including wetlands, slopes and trees. 4. The property is a good economic value. 5. There is safe and easy access to the area. 6. The site could provide year -round recreational opportunities. 7. There has been strong neighborhood interest in preserving the site. The city shall not make these changes until the city closes on the property. Commissioner Rossbach seconded. Commissioner Frost asked to have "west of Sterling" clarified. Commissioner Rossbach said his motion was just for the one property zoned R -1. Mr. Roberts confirmed that the resolution also was only written for the one. property. Ayes —all The motion passed. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commision recommend the City Council direct staff to negotiate with the owner of the property directly to the east of the Grandview property, sitting between that property and Sterling Street. He suggested this be done for the following reasons: 1.. The owner is willing to negotiate with the city. 2. The parcel is connected to the parcel of land that was just recommended for open space. As noted earlier, the larger the parcel, the better. 3. There is a fair chance that this property will also be an economic value. Commissioner Kittridge seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. &40 Y MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager .FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT. Holiday Store LOCATION: SE Conner — McKnight and Lower Afton Roads DATE: December 4, 1995 INTRODUCTION Project Description Action by C owic i l o. Endore Re j ecte - - Date Mark Nelson, of Holiday Companies, is proposing to build a 4,000- square -foot, one - story Holiday store with fuel sales and a car wash. Refer to the maps on pages 12 and 17. There would be two pump islands with one dispenser on each island. Two vehicles could fuel up at each island at a time. Refer to the project description on page 18. (Since last September, the applicant revised the building design. Refer to the schematic drawing on page 38. Request Mr. Nelson is requesting the following: 1. A comprehensive plan change from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). 2. A rezoning from CO to BC. Refer to the statement on page 19. 3. A code change to allow two pump islands instead of only one. Refer. to page 21. 4. A conditional use permit (CUP) for a motor fuel station in a BC district. Refer to page 20. Reasons for the Requests 1. Plan change and rezoning: The code does not allow a fuel station on CO -zoned land. The applicant needs BC zoning. 2. Code change: The code does not allow�more than one pump island. The applicant is proposing two. 3. CUP: The code allows fuel stations on land zoned BC only by conditional use permit. BACKGROUND Holiday Store September 19, 1994: The planning commission tabled this review until the developer presents a property value study, submits a community design review board application and provides information on the drive - through car wash noise. March 14, 1995: The community design review board approved the site, landscaping _ and architectural plans. September 11, 1995: The city council tabled the public hearing for this request until December 11, 1995. Adjacent Site — Proposed Parkview Townhouses July 10, 1995: The city council denied a proposal for 118 townhouses on a 20 -acre site to the southeast. Refer to page 15. This property is presently adjoined with the Holiday store site as one tract of land. Refer to the Past Actions on page 9 for additional background information. DISCUSSION Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Change The current land use plan designation and zoning is CO (commercial once). The CO zone allows offices and related commercial uses. The proposed zoning is BC (business commercial). The BC zone includes a wide variety of commercial uses, ranging from offices to fast -food restaurants and gas stations. As an alternative, the BGM (business commercial modified) zone would allow minor fuel stations, but does not allow car washes. Since the BC zone allows such a variety of uses, the city should put a time limit on any zoning or land use change. If the Holiday Station is not built, the city could rezone the property back to CO. There are no specific findings for changing the land use plan. There are, however, certain general development policies for commercial properties. Refer to page 28. This proposal meets these criteria. The four requirements for rezoning are on page 100 This proposal meets all but part of the fourth requirement: This requirement states that "the proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools." This proposal would create more police calls than an office use. See the crime section below. Code Change The code defines minor fuel station as "a retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels which provides no more than one island with a maximum of two dispensers." The applicant is proposing two small islands with each having one fuel dispenser. The intent of the ordinance is to limit the number of vehicles that can fuel up at one time to four. Having two islands, each with one dispenser, would meet the intent of the ordinance. Dispensers that can serve more than two cars at one time are possible, but not probable. According to the Minnesota Service Station Association, such dispensers make up only 2% of the market. The ordinance should mw require .that the dispensers be designed to fuel only two cars at one time (one car on each side). Eliminating the one island requirement would not change the ordinance's intent, but would allow more flexibility in site design. The ordinance also changes the definition of major fuel station, since it is defined as a station having two or more islands. Conditional Use Permit and Site Design The proposed gas station would meet the requirements for a CUP. This use would generate more traffic than an office, but, according to Bob Hamilton, a traffic engineer with the City of St. Paul and Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, the station would not cause any major problems or safety issues. There is one change required in the site plan. The city code prohibits parking spaces within the line of vision between self- service fuel dispensers and the attendant's window. The CUP approval should state this as a requirement. K Open Space One neighbor suggested that the city use this site as an extension of . Battle Creek Regional Park. Larry Holmberg, a supervisor with the Ramsey County Park Department, told me that the county has no plans to buy this property. The entire 25 acres owned by Mr. Johnson was on the city's open space acquisition list. Mr. Johnson had previously told the city that he did not want to sell his land to Maplewood for open space. He wanted to sell it for development. Traffic Some neighbors stated concerns about too much traffic at McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. McKnight Road is four lanes and Lower Afton Road is two lanes with a paved shoulder. There is. a four -way stop at the intersection. The city has designated both these roads.as major arterials. Major arterials are designed for carving high volumes of traffic to and from residential neighborhoods. Bob Hamilton, of the City of St. Paul, said that the proposed Holiday station would increase traffic, but would not cause any major problems or safety issues. He thought that the use was appropriate for the comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. He said that McKnight Road was well equipped to handle the traffic. He suggested that the city require a traffic study to determine levels of service and the need for signals. Mr. Hamilton thought that the setback of the drives from the comer was acceptable. Dan Solar, the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer, told me that the intersection does not have any significant traffic problems. Both McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road have adequate capacity to handle the traffic from the Holiday station. The four -way stop sign is functioning well. As the south end of Maplewood continues to develop, it is likely that the county will signalize this intersection. Mr. Solar thought this might happen in about five years. He stated that the driveway locations were acceptable for the Holiday station. He did not feel that a traffic study was needed. One of the neighbors stated that MTC busses had to be rerouted because of the traffic. The MTC said they have done some route changes in that area, but the changes had nothing to do with the traffic. Other Stations One of the neighbors wrote that "Within a two mile radius of our house, we have gas station /convenience stores. We do not need another gas station." One of the people objecting to the Holiday Station is an owner of the Shamrock Plaza. There is a SuperAmerica Station there. The station has two dispensers on one island and a 24 -hour convenience store. The city attorney advised me that the city cannot deny a change to the comprehensive plan or zoning map because of the number of similar uses in the area. The courts have stated that cities cannot make market judgments. Cities must base their decisions on land use criteria. The market will determine how many and which gas stations the neighborhood will support. 3 Crime One of the. residents complained that the Holiday Station would create high volumes of transient traffic and provide a hangout for youth gangs much like the SuperAmerica station across the street at Shamrock Plaza. According to the St. Paul Police Department, in the last 12 months, there were 38 police calls. to Shamrock Plaza. Our research a year.ago showed that there were 158 calls to the SuperAmerica Station between January, 1992 and September, 1994. Most of the calls were some type of disorderly conduct, theft or traffic violations. The Holiday station may have fewer calls because of the hours of operation. The SuperAmerica station is open 24 hours. The city code would limit the Holiday station hours of operation to 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Ken Collins, the Maplewood Director of Public Safety, told me that there should not be a problem of gangs hanging out. Most convenience store operators call the police if this happens. He said that convenience stores are usually monitored by the police to avoid such problems. Mr. Collins stated that a convenience store would probably generate more police calls than an office, but the police calls would not affect the neighborhood. Most such calls are for theft, traffic violations or people driving off without paying for gas. Such calls do not generally affect surrounding homes. Drainage The District 1 Council in St. Paul and an owner of the Shamrock Plaza were concerned about drainage. I talked to Roger Puchreiter at . the St. Paul engineering department. He was not aware of any flooding or drainage problems. There is a storm sewer along the east side of McKnight Road. The city does not allow surface drainage to the street. The developer will have to drain the surface water into catch basins and pipe the water to the storm sewer. This should improve the existing drainage. The water from the Holiday station site now drains onto McKnight Road. Property Value Impact and Car Wash Noise Potential Last September, the planning commission noted these two issues as specific concerns that they required the applicant to address. The applicant submitted the studies addressing these concerns. Property Values I have enclosed the findings from the applicant's property value impact analysis on pages 22 -24. This study was prepared by Ruppert & Ruppert Associates, Inc., real estate appraisers. In summary, the study finds that there would not be any negative impact on the value of the five homes to the south. Staff agrees with .these findings listed on page 24. In response to our survey of the neighbors, the property owner at 338 McKnight Road felt that the Holiday station would decrease his property values. Richard Simmer, a commercial appraiser for Ramsey County, said that a convenience center with gas would generally have a negative effect on surrounding residential property values. In this case, however, the negative effect is mitigated by the existing LBC (limited business commercial) zoning to the north, the Shamrock Plaza across McKnight Road and by McKnight Road itself. The nearest house would also be separated from the proposed Holiday station by about 250 feet of wooded land. (The nearest neighbor, at 228 McKnight Road, did not express any concern about the potential for a negative impact on property values.) 4 Car Wash Noise I. have enclosed the applicant's car wash noise analysis on pages 25-27. This report concludes in saying that the car wash must be equipped with a noise reduction package to stay below the maximum noise limits set by the PCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency). It has been staff s observation that the noise is also reduced when the car wash doors are closed while the car wash is in operation. The applicant should be required to have the car wash doors set up to always be closed when the car wash is running. Options 1. Change the land use plan and zoning map to BGM (business commercial modified). This would allow the gas station, but not the car wash. 2. Approve the developer's requests. 3. Deny the developer's requests. Conclusion The decision in this case is whether a convenience store with gas sales and a car wash is better for the city and the neighborhood than offices. The advantage of the proposed use is improved service for area residents. The disadvantage over offices is more traffic and more police calls, but. as stated earlier, these possibilities are not significant. I do not see strong reasons for denying or approving these requests. The revised building design on page 38 is also more attractive than the design submitted to the CDRB last March. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 33. This resolution changes the land use plan designation for the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons: 1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial development. 2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to the south. 3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as. the proposed Holiday store. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this land use plan change. B. Adopt the resolution on page 34. This resolution changes the zoning on the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial once) to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 5 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this rezoning. C. Approve the code change on page 37. This change allows two fuel- dispenser islands for .minor fuel stations rather than one island. The number of fuel dispensers allowed shall not change. D. Adopt the resolution on pages 35 and 36. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial) at the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. This permit is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code. 5. The developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line( code requirement). 6. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating.. 7. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code requirement). 8. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution _ Control Agency (code requirement). 6 9. The developer shall not disturb the land or remove any trees between the grading limits of this site and 328 McKnight Road. 10. The building official shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until the city approves a lot division creating this site and the applicant records the new deed with Ramsey County. A condition of this lot split would be the dedication .of three feet of additional right -of -way for the future widening of McKnight Road. 7 CITIZENS' COMMENTS We surveyed owners of the eight properties within 350 feet of this property. Of the six replies, three were in favor and three objected. In Favor 1. I believe it will lead to further development in the surrounding area. (Midway National Bank, Apple Valley) 20 It is a much needed development for south Maplewood. Refer to the further comments in the letter on page 29. (Johnson, 2299 iondin Lane) 3. Refer to the letter on page 30. (Garth, 2276 Londin Lane) Opposed 1. a. McKnight and Lower Afton cannot handle anymore traffic than it already has. It is dangerous enough trying to pull out of our driveway now. MTC busses had to be rerouted because of the traffic. b. Within a two mile radius of our house, we have gas station /convenience stores. We do of need another gas station. c. Development of this property will only decrease the value of my property. Sell this property to the state. as an addition to Battle Creek Park. (Palmer,- 338 McKnight Road) 2. It increases high volumes of transient traffic and provides a hangout for youth gangs much like the SA station does today. Use this land for a store front plaza or office building for less overall traffic (transient) than agas /quick -stop grocery store does. (Ketch, 328 McKnight Road) 3. Refer to the letter on page 31. (Anderson, Shamrock Plaza, St. Paul) 4. .Refer to the letter on page 32. (District 1 Community Council) 8 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 1.25 acres Existing Land use: undeveloped SURROUNDING LAND USES North.: Lower Afton Road and Battle Creek Park South: undeveloped commercial property and single dwellings West: McKnight Road and Shamrock Shopping Center in St. Paul East: undeveloped commercial property PAST ACTION July 1, 1971: The city council granted a special use permit over the entire 25 -acre site. The permit was for a 375 -unit apartment and town house development. This permit expired in 1972. October 10, 1983: The city council rezoned the southeast comer of Lower Afton and McKnight Roads from F .(farm residence) to CO. The council also changed the land use plan from RM (medium density residential) to LSC (limited service commercial) for this property. (LSC was the previous classification before the city began using zoning classifications last year.) The LSC designation allowed minor motor fuel stations. December 12, 1988: The council approved a CUP for a planned unit development (PUD). The PUD was for the entire 25 acres owned by Mr. Johnson. The PUD included 152 rental town houses, a 33,600 - square -foot retail center and two gas dispensers on one island. June 1, 1991: The CUP expired. January 11, 1993: The city adopted a new comprehensive plan. As part of this plan, the city changed the land use categories to match the zoning districts. As a result, the land use for the Holiday site changed from LSC to CO. PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: CO Zoning: CO Ordinance Requirements Section 36- 151(b)(9) requires a CUP for a minor motor fuel station and car wash in a BC district. Zone Change - Findings for Approval Section 36 -485 of the zoning code requires that the city council make the following findings to rezone property: 1 The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or. plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable,. and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the Logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. CUP - Findings for Approval Section 36- 442(a) requires that the city council approve CUPs based on specific standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 35 and 36. OTHER AGENCIES Ramsey Soil and Water Conversation District Robert Johnson, of the soil conservation district, stated that care must be taken to protect nearby wetland and the abutting streets from sedimentation. Care must also be taken to protect groundwater from underground tanks. 10 p:secl 2- 281holiday6..mem Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map - Existing 3. Land Use Plan Map Proposed 4. Property Line / Zoning Map - Existing 5. Property Line /Zoning Map - Proposed 6. Site Plan 7. Description of the Proposed Development 8. Rezoning Statement 9. Conditional Use Permit Statement 10. Code Amendment Letter 11. Property Value Impact Analysis 12. Car Wash Noise Analysis 13. Commercial and Industrial Development Policies 14. Letter from Arnold Johnson dated July 18,,1994 15. Letter from Gerhard Gerth dated July 19, 1994 16. Letter from Allen J. Anderson dated July 18, 1994 17. Letter from District 1 Community Council 18. Resolution - Comprehensive Plan Change 19. Resolution - Zoning Map Change 20. Resolution - Conditional Use Permit 21. Code Change 22. Revised Building Schematic 23. Plans date- stamped July 31, 1995 (separate attachment) 11 Attachment 1 u t1� • ry DR. • .. u aC m v �,� LA. CREEIrC Z a Z 1. HUhMNGTO;N CT. 2. OAKRIDGE LA. JAMES W DR. cam` ui tpl - � 0 v x Z Cc . uj ` UPPER AFTON RD. U. • • • :3 •(.Af.� ' .. c • ORES . •. . LOWER ~ ea • f 1•• ' O 1 • • •.. ' ..: • ~. • LONDI u• El cr Hi G 4w RAMSEY COUNtY COR RECTIONS. FAciLrTY ' �.. :: ': . • POND c� uj Z pODAY iii !A "Ry LA. .. • . .. • • V ` w � K�NC D A 0' DAY � •' • . ' p A "tLAN D RD. � < Q C1R. o :. �• • •; .. C 1 cc o 0 • , o •• TIC wooD O DR. CRESTVI EW FOREST • . • • '' 0 OAKR OR. CT. c� o DR. ` ' ' ' +} _ Z HILLWOOD � Z � •• ... a Q z• DR. . •� Ci SpRC _ ... . ' S1 •. o Ll NWOOD AVE. .. O r. v4 L AVE. Opp CT R LOCATION MAP 12 N EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11 4 N 13 r - .e • t i - lkw all NO - - - -- _ . �� . � a man ■ t of :A Is • s IOWA fir■■■ ■■ ., mir ior s w - '%mm oo m llecto r • fr� ' ••• ! 1 1 / 1 1 1 {� i f 1 1 1 1 f I 1 i- i {{ f i{/ 1 1 f I f i; i i i i 1 / 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 i ■ •a WON EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 11 4 N 13 PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 17 4 N 14 rm e w Rs ■ �� • . - • l �. •fie ®� � � Nis minor collector �..a m ■ -.. min 1 - R-1 • collector p V-:Affif W • ••• ! i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 5= 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � rr ■ PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN PLANNING AREA NUMBER 17 4 N 14 Attachment 4 1632.1 ONO Tora L 1 8 - P ROPOSED H FOR PARK `EFL. ().9i..c'� STORE SITE brp a a� F- a cn 4 i �..�_ 95 LOWER AFTON ROAD- -� C 0 �WOODEV . =7 LOW LAND 1 9 Z4.6 7 I■■m■■ MEMENNEN MEMO OMEN BC N) Q • SITE PARKVIEW '328 338 (�to Co OE < 5 ' R - t MENT 346 APA C N cONNE N 358 tV 106b.451 NNW ' 4 C j68 73.g ZI5.416 �� 2�G.82 0 366 11 4 1 iTORr+ t0 N 3 3 N Co ; ap ac . <4) , O s a,c. C�) : M' dc. � �, v t.�1� ; ` ART (4'� C14 0 08 N� - - _ _ - IaG' OUT LOT A i �� tf r a 4 �,� ezq• O 1. x 1� O � ,!°� MCKNIs-MT' 'T'OWNNOMES 1 `• 370 -384 6 VTILITY - �E�t+�T.� - , - �� / 'j 0 512 91 * --- 6. Q R i a 9�2 l¢p - fo c,Q �Gov�S 13 TWRU 2.02 �� ,z� Co ' PROPERTY LINE / ZONING MAP Q EXISTING ZONING N SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE I i 15 Attachment I ; 1-0 2 6 3 2 -9 Now am 7 OTA L IS - 8 2- PROPOSED HOLIDAY RESERVED FOR , STOR SITE (791 ON\ �16 l�. f LOWER AFTON ROAD 7 0 Rl- WOODEV, C 0 .......... .......... LOW LAND 24 87 ti NI Q • � rJ IBC PARKVIEW, TOWNHOUSE SITE 0 1 I ( Sv 0 N O � � � 3 AFAR' % =93 ro S o PB fli 40' 0 126 PROPOSED ZONING SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE 4 16 1s 6oZ L +-N - - 3 - �,� - - t -� ,, ._. 75- 75' 1717.568 11 3.41 33 14 54 G7 � � 3 r � scwFR �,q, �, 29 9 3 'ift 4 ffi A.. 4 rk, S T on -Ile cost 0 UT L(-- 177.Upb C M • 62-q-z FL11 4. Gre oz. MCKNI&HT T0wivNom0 Co —0p aw PROPOSED ZONING SITE OF PROPOSED HOLIDAY STATIONSTORE 4 16 Attachment 6 1 LONER AFTON ROAD • mow ,,, p• • Ilk � MBA ��..► !tom) . T I N • Ati►1 •' b W t W 1 . • i �� 4 T . y r • } 1.0 • •.. , , 1 . N� . t�/r i �RI�A fII�II • may �"'-I M N�aw�ew �.,,. � , � �•--I : ' • r� , i { • ; na one SITE PLAN 17 4 N 1 •1 , ` { ..��. 3l,� a 1 TA brow • iONN• T �,.,,T • .�, --�. -- W L of a 9 , V 1 t �al* 0043 Gem 4w . W*l T•►) .,,.•.�+.•.+ w 4ft.•.rw=r.r i o SITE PLAN 17 4 N Attachment 7 Description of Proposed Development Southeast Corner of McKnight Road. and Lower Afton Road Maplewood, Minnesota Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience store /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road to serve the convenience. needs of the surrounding area. The property is a large 115 acre parcel fronted by McKnight Road to the west, Lower Afton Road to the north and vacant, Commercial Office District property to the south and east. Holiday's proposal includes an approximately 4,000 square foot convenience store building, two gasoline islands with an overhead canopy, and a car wash. The project is oriented to McKnight Road to serve the convenience needs of the surrounding area. The proposal includes a small area of the convenience store building dedicated to a brand name food sales area, to be operated by Holiday. This large site is able to efficiently accommodate a drive -thru window for this brand name food area in conjunction with the traffic flow patterns for the proposed car wash. Drive -thru and car wash customers will exit toward Lower Afton Road. At a minimum, the proposal meets the zoning and development criteria. In all areas possible, this proposal provides greater setbacks, parking spaces, and landscaped areas than required in the zoning ordinance. Holiday is excited at the prospect of becoming part of the Maplewood community. We look forward to providing a quality facility and operation to meet the convenience needs of the area. MWN /jw5 18 Attachment 8 Rezoning Statement Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Maplewood, Minnesota Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes development of a neighborhood convenience store /superette with gasoline for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road to serve thec convenience needs of the surrounding area. The property is zoned CO- commercial Office District. A convenience store /superette with gasoline requires a BC- Business Commercial District zoning. Therefore, Holiday Stationstores, Inc. requests a I zoning change from CO to BC for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. The proposed Holiday convenience store /superette with gasoline ( "Holiday store ") will help serve the existing convenience needs of the area. This development will cater to existing traffic and is not intended to "draw" customers from outside the surrounding area of the site. The site layout promotes safe, efficient on- and off -site circulation and traffic patterns. The proposed Holiday store will provide the most advanced safety systems available. Lighting will promote a safe environment, but will not adversely affect adjoining property. Landscaping and green space is proposed to minimize any impacts the development may have on the immediate area and architectural features will be used to avoid a "commercial look" to the development. The density of the proposed development will be less than what could be developed under the CO- Commercial Office District. The quality of the proposed development should positively impact value in the area. Neighboring property to the west is developed commercially, property to the northwest is high density residential, property to the north is park land /open space, and property to the south /southeast is vacant. Surrounding property, for the most part, is already in use and this proposed project will not detract from that use. Architecturally, the proposed Holiday store will be designed to fit the character of the neighborhood. The property proposed for rezoning enjoys all public services (immediately accessible) and will not create a demand on such services beyond existing capacities. Overall, a. zoning change for this .property will allow the addition of _a high- quality, state - of -the -art convenience facility to meet the needs of the neighborhood. MWNfjw:doc4 19 Attachment 9 Conditional Use Statement Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and g Lower. Afton Road Maplewood, Minnesota Holiday Stationstores, Inc. proposes develop • p t of a neighborhood ..convenience store /superette with gasoline for the southe corner ' of McKnight Road_and Lower .Afton Road to serve the conveni needs of the surrounding area. The property is a large 1.25 acre parcel fronted by McKnight Road on the west, ,Lower Afton Road to the north and vacant, Commercial Office District ro ert to the p p y s outh and east. The proposed Holiday convenience store /su erette wit i • m meet the.zoning and develop p th ga ol�ne (Holiday store) will, at a mi ment criteria f ' p or the City, of Maplewood. In all areas possible, this proposal provides • p p greater setbacks, parking spaces and landscaped areas than required in the zoning ordinance. • g ce. Holidays proposal will not substantially alter the commercial and retail character la • p nned for the surrounding area. The high quality of the proposed develop should positively ' . p positively impact value in the area. The proposed use is not excessive for this site and should • ould not promote any nuisances in the area. The Holiday store will cater to existing traffic ' g c and is not intended to draw customers form outside the surrounding area of the site. The site layout promotes safe and efficient on - and off -site circulation and traffic patterns. The property enjoys all public services (immediately accessible ) and will not create eate a demand on such services beyond existing capacit This develop will use h ' ' p the highest quality materials and design features, and will employ the most advanced. technology and safety systems ava ilable. Holiday looks forward to becoming a part of the Maplewood community and providing a quality facility and operation to meet the convenience needs of the area. MWN /jw6 20 Attachment 10 Holiday Companies CEN. OFFICE: 456' WEST 80th STREET / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1224 MINNEAPOLIS. N11 55440 / PH. 612 - 830 -8 -00 It FAX b12- 830 -8864 CREDIT OFFICE: 5501 W. OLD SH.AKOPEE RD. / MAIL ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1216 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 / PH. 612 - 921 -5200 / FAX 612 -921 -5295 July 28, 1994 Mr. Tom Ekstrand City of Maplewood JJL o �-_• 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 RE: Zoning Code Amendment for Holiday Stationstores, Inc. Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Dear Mr. Ekstrand: As we have discussed during the past ' several weeks, Holiday's development proposal, for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road, includes one gasoline* dispenser on two separate dispenser islands. This design promotes safer and more efficient traffic circulation than two dispensers on one dispenser isl and, and still meets the inte of the code with a fueling capacity for only four vehicles at one time. We are trying to meet the intent of the Zoning Code by limiting fueling capacity. We simply wish to design the site in a manner to most effectively serve our customers. We ask for a Code Amendment to specifically allow two separate dispenser island as our plan depicts. We will still have only the two gasoline dispensers as required by the Zoning Code. Please incorporate this request as part of ou application. Call me directly at 830 -8767 if you have any q uestions, or if you wish to schedule a meeting to further discuss our proposal. Thank you for your continued assistance. Sincerely, HOLIDAY STATIO[VSTORFS, INC, Mark W. Nelson, Manager Real Estate MWN : jw9 h � F60D � BLESS' Haaar ter. 21 Attachme 11 g t HOLIDAY COMPANIES July 19, 1995 Page 5 of 7 PROPOSED STORE iMM_ The concern is that the market value of the five existing single family homes to the south will be negatively impacted by construction of the proposed Holiday Store. The addresses of the five homes in question and their 1994 assessed values, building age and foundation size are as follows: r ADDRESS ..:. � :a. •.. .:. : .f�.0 t .4 {.•... -,,. .:. X' � \.• ,,y 'i v.:i .: -'• c w .,. .• .. i %... /.,')Gn ),. .w•. .... IS -. :: �w+:. T`...' .:t. �.. ..,f`;a.r : Y'^ ..a....,. ..'�:k.) 1.. . 7�.g - r ESS:ED '. ^�) 4�. iN°P,:� BUILDIl�T .HIV C .) \.. f,C TX .'/.'.. .:s` :ti. ' :i \ X Z. •Y . � •• � ....�... '�'> 328 McKnight Road $81,500 1977 982 square feet 338 McKnight Road $80, 1977 1,040 square feet 346 McKnight Road $90,000 1977 1,660 square feet 358 McKnight Road $83,100 1977 1,040 square feet 2271 Londin Lane $74,800 1955 936 square feet This information was obtained from Ramsey County. The home fronting on Londin Lane faces away from the proposed Holiday station site and would in no way be affected by the proposed store. The remaining four homes all front on McKnight Road (facing west) which is a heavily traveled roadway (8,500 cars per day) and are located near an existing neighborhood commercial strip center (Shamrock Plaza). 22 HOLIDAY COMPANIES July 19, 1995 Page 6 of 7 1*3 04 Q 301) 9-4 15 i ZT0 W"I I Implicit in the definition of market value is the assumption that the buyer is acting prudently and knowledgeably. A prudent and knowledgeable buyer of any of the five homes located south of the proposed Holiday store would inquire as to the development possibilities of the Arnold E. Johnson site. The potential buyer would become aware of the .previously proposed developments and the current proposed developments (Parkview). A potential buyer would also inquire about the zoning and potential uses of the adjacent property. In short, a prudent and knowledgeable buyer would fully expect that the Arnold E. Johnson property will be developed as a mixed -use development in the near future and would take into consideration this fact when making an offer to purchase one of the five homes to the south, .Th above is true reizardless gf whether or not o Holidav Store is r sed or conslocted on a n�orton of this site. The existing CO zoning allows for a wide variety of office and related commercial uses such as restaurants and retail sales. IN OUR OPINION. THE PROPOSED, HOLIDAY STORE WILL HAVE NO MORE OR L ESS OF AN IMPACT ON THE HOMES TQ THE SOUTH THAN AN FF E .DEVE LOPMENT W1 1H RELATED USES, YMICH IS A PERMITTED USE UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING. The proposed Holiday store site IS NOT VISIBLE from any of the residences to the south. The topography and vacant commercial site to the north (which is heavily wooded) prevent any direct view of the proposed Holiday store site. From the southern property line of the proposed Holiday store site to the northern property line of the northernmost home (328 McKnight Road), is :approximately 270 lineal feet. This distance combined with the upward sloping topography further mitigate any potential negative impact. Even if the vacant commercial tract in between the proposed Holiday store site and the single family homes was not heavily wooded, visibility of the proposed Holiday store site would be poor. The upward sloping topography would result in the single family homes "looking over" the Holiday store. Finally, the vacant commercial site between the proposed Holiday store site and the single family homes to the south serves as a "buffer" between the two uses. This site is zoned LBC with permitted uses including office, clinics and daycare. This is a "lighter" zoning than either CO or BC and would provide an adequate "buffer" or "step down" between the two uses. 1. 23 HOLIDAY COMPANIES July 19, 1995 � Page 7 of 7 1-91110 11 It is our considered opinion that construction of the proposed Holida y store at the southeast corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Road WOULD NOT NEGATIVELY AFFECT the five single family homes to the south. The reasons for this opinion are summarized as follows: 1. The home fronting on Londin Lane faces away rom the proposed Holiday station y P p y site. The four homes fronting on McKnight Road (facing west ) are located on a heavily traveled roadway near an existing neighborhood commercial strip � p center. 2. A potential purchaser of any of these homes would have had knowledge of the development potential of the Arnold - E. Johnson property. 3. The proposed Holiday Store would have NO MORE OR LESS IMPACT on the homes to the south than an office development with related uses, which is a permitted use under the current zoning. 4. The proposed Holiday Store site is VIRTUALLY NOT VISIBLE from an y of the five homes to the south given the distance, topography and wooded area. 5. The vacant parcel between the proposed Holiday store site and the five single family homes to the south SERVES AS A BUFFER between the two uses. We hope this information has been helpful. If you have any questions or comments, p lease do not hesitate to contact us. RUPPERT & RUPPERT ASSOCIATES, INC. R. r ser pd`t;'Pre�sident Ap License 4000850 I SJR/jah itr2602.wpd 24 Appraiser License 4000851 PROJECT NUMBER: INTRODUCTION Attachment 12 Hmtmgdon 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 2 0 4 DATE: Mash 21, 1995 *Revised: July 25 -1995 This report presents the results of a plan review and acoustical opinion of a proposed Holiday Stationstore and associated car wash to be located in Maplewood, Minnesota. This work was requested by Mr. Scott Alpaugh of Holiday Companies on February 14, 1995 with the analysis conducted on March 17 and 20, 1995. ANALYSIS SUMMARY & OPINION: The following is based on a plan review of the proposed site and sound pressure data obtained on a similar configuration measured in South Gate, California. The estimated dBA sound pressure levels at the nearest residence straight south of the car wash entrance is 53 dB without the noise reduction and 48 dB with the noise reduction package. Sound pressure levels at the nearest residence to the SE of the car wash entrance is 50 dB without the noise reduction and 45 dB with the noise reduction package. MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) noise standards state the L, and L so values for an NAG1 (Noise Area Classification- Residential) cannot exceed 65 and 60 dB respectfully during the daytime hours of 7 am to 10 pm. Conversely, the L, and L so values cannot exceed 55 and 50 dB during the nighttime hours of 10 pm to 7 am. NOTE: L, and L are levels exceeded 10 and 50 % of the time. SUMMATION If the car wash is otter., ated in daytim hours only and with the note reduction pack e, no noise violation is anticipated. There is the potential for a noise violation if the car wash is operated after to pm and without the noise reduction pack *Note: The proposed hours of operation will be from 6AM -11PM. It is further proposed that the noise reduction package will be utilized. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A plat was furnished of the proposed Parkview Development which will be located in the SE corner of McKnight and Lower Afton Road, Maplewood, Minnesota. In addition, sound level data was furnish: d by Nationwide Wash Systems, Inc. This data consisted of a series of tables listing octave band and 1/3 octave band sound pressure levels as well as dBA and dB Linear values (these latter levels were essentially identical). See attached tables. The data listed two sets of values which applied to a Thrust Pro Dryer with and without a Noise Reduction package. A 5 dB reduction was realized with the NR package installed. Distance measurements were obtained from the car wash entrance to the nearest residence located to the AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. co A member of the HIH group of companies 25 Htmtin n PROJECT NUMBER: 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 3 0� DA TE:. Math 21, 1995 *Revised: July 25, 1995 south and southeast (350 and 325' respectively). Using the sound level data provided and the Inverse Square Law suppositions, anticipated noise levels were calculated. No .provisions were applied relative to the wind or atmospheric conditions. No residences were indicated to the north or west of the car wash *within 350 feet. TABLE 1 Octave Band Noise Levels (Decibels) For Car Wash Dryer (Thrust Pro) With and Without Noise Reduction Package (NRP) Hertz Dry er with NRP er _without NRP 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16,000 dBA dBC Linear 37 53 61 72.5 73.3 72 72.5 67.6 56 42.9 80 87 79.7 38 49.5 55 61 70 69.5 73.3 68.2 61.8 49.9 84.3 89.3 84.5 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS, AND AUTHONZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. tJ A member of the HIH group of companies 26 PROJECT NUMBER: HtmtMgqon 4140 95 -1347 PAGE: 4 DATE: March 21 1995 *Revised: July 25, 1995 TABLE 2 g: \shared \mmfiles\rk \95 -1347 One -Third Octave Band - Noise Levels (Decibels) For Car Wash Dryer (Thrust Pro) With and Without Noise Reduction Package (NRP) Hertz Drver with NRP Dryer without 20 23 30 25 19.5 29.5 31.5 27 28.8 40 32 33.5 50 38.2 38.5 63 44.5 47 80 52.2 51.8 100 53.6 54.7 125 55 56.5 160 57.5 57.8 200 63.5 60.9 250 65 66 315 75 78 400 71 78 500 65.2 69.2 630 67.1 70.5 800 67.3 72.8 1000 68 72 1250 66.2 72.2 1600 63.6 71 2000 67.5 70.8 2500 70 70..5 3150 65.5 69.2 4000 60.5 63.7 5000 58 60.5 6300 53.3 59.1 8000 50.5 53 10,000 47 49.4 12,500 46.1 43.1 16 36 37.2 20,000 32 29.2 AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES, ALL HUNTINGDON ENGINEERING &. ENVIRONMENTAL INC REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL. t� A member of the HIH group of companies 27 Attachment 13 COMMERCLAL AND MUSTRLAL DEVELOP POLICIES. The following are the City's commercial and industrial development policies: . • Group compatible businesses In suitable areas. • Provide attractive surroundings in which to shop and work. • Require adequate off - street loading facUities. • Promote the joint nse of psrkin;g areas, drives and tmsh containers. • Avoid disruption of adjacent residential areas. • Use planned unit developments (PUDs) wherever practical. Maintain orderly transitions between commercial and residential areas. • Require commercial and industrial developers to snake all necessary improvements to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. • Require adequate screening or buffering of . new or expanded commercial areas from any adjacent existing or . planned residential development. • Restrict commercial development which will result in traffic volumes which are beyond the capacity of the road systems or generate excessive noise or pollution as defined by state standards. • Plan Land uses and streets to route nonresidential traffic around residential neighborhoods. .%7 Attachment 14 J �',ot .,,.. -� �9..o 000?o,,e, 4 ��e -00 . .00 woo 0 e000 29 Attachment 15 Iii 4 � Co .munity Development Department City o f Maplewood 1830 East County Road Maplewood Minnesota 55109 Dear Sirs We need more convenient :shopping in this area and Holiday, with its diverse merchandise will provide for this. T he Shamrock Center, lc ^ated in :the city of St. pawl ie beginning to T mr ' have a run -down appearance* This a dded competition will help the neighborhood. The town of Maplewood. benefit from the added tax base. The overall development of the John$on property is well thought out and - will be an ass t to Maplewood . eve an additional four as pumps would be. more appropriate. I beli g The Super America rtore on the opp osite corner has only four pumps and there are al ways cars waiting. Dote• I wCas not sent a copy of the opinion survey as any home is . located on Lo ndin Lane --not in the imr.-edistc area of the purposed Holiday Station St :re, I drive by this comer every day and I would aTpreciate this new addition to the neighborhood. Sincerely, 01 1.0 /W-Al-w�Or Gerhard Gerth 30 A. J. ANDERSON &.CO8 LTD. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 93 W. LITTLE CANADA ROAD, SUITE 104 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 Phone: (612) 490.9190 juft- July 18, 1994 Mr. Kenneth Roberts, Association. Planner City of Maplewood 1830 East County Road B Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 Re: Proposed Holiday Gas Station, Car Wash, and Convenience Store at McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Dear Mr. Roberts: We are strongly opposed to rezoning this area for the following reasons: 1.) We know that cutting down the hill along McKnight Road will permit a flood to occur at Shamrock Plaza Shopping Center. We were nearly flooded out several .years ago when a very heavy rain storm occurred! An elimination of the hill and a large blacktopped area will permit the water to wash down on us. We believe this will permit very serious damage to us. 2.) A Super America gas station and convenience store already exists at our shopping center which adequately serves the convenience needs of the neighborhood. 3.) A car wash will draw people from other neighborhoods and will create further congestion and traffic problems at the intersection of Mc 1 1:nygh 1 k - . Road and Lower Afton Road. Who will pay for signal lights and required widening of the roads? We recommend that the zoning remain the same and that the hill n t be removed and that the property be used for residential. We have served notice to Ramsey County and City of Saint Paul regarding the potential flood problem to us that would be created by this proposed rezoning. Very truly yours, Allen J. Anderson General Partner Shamrock Plaza Partnership 31 Attachment 17 District:LCommunity Council District 1 News. Conway Recreation Center • 2090 Conway St. •Room 126 • SL Paul, MN 55119 (612) 292 -7828 The Maplewood Planning Commission c/o Mr. Geoff Olson Director of Community Development City of Maplewood 1830 E. County Road B Maplewood, MN 55109 September 6,1994 Re: Rezoning, Southeast Corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road Dear Geoff: Thank you very much for taking the time to meet with the District 1 Hearing Committee. It was very helpful and informative to have you there and the committee certainly appreciated your time. As mentioned at the meeting the committee and other members of the community had some concerns about the proposed rezoning, including the following: 1. The impact of increased traffic and potential need for signals at the intersection. 2. The location of curb cuts and impact of traffic flow in and out of the proposed station on McKnight and Lower Afton Road. 3. Effect of Additional run off on storm sewer capacity. 4. The environmental impact of cutting down and grading the site and effect on the pond to the East. 5. The intensity of the rezoning from CO to BC, the highest intensity business zone. Is this zoning appropriate for this location? Would the site be returned to CO if this project is not carried out? Geoff, thank you again for your time. If it would be alright I would like to attend the Planning Commission Meeting. May I have you send a copy of the agenda? (My fax number is 292- 7829.) I look forward to working with you on this and future projects. Best J c 1I'Clk. . W hen unity Organizer CC: Ms. Garneth Peterson, Planner PED Ms. Toni Baker, Ramsey County Commission 32 Attachment 18 LAND USE PLAN CHANGE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a change to the city's land use plan from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, this change applies to the 1.25 acre tract at the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. WHEREAS, the history of this change is as follows: 1. The planning commission held a public hearing on , 1 City staff published a hearing. notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The planning commission.gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The planning commission recommended that the city council the plan amendment. 2. The city council discussed the plan amendment on , 199 . They considered reports and recommendations from the planning commission and city staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described change for the following reasons: 1. It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial development. 2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to the south. 3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the proposed Holiday Store. Adopted on 1 1995 33 Attachment 19 REZONING RESOLUTION Whereas, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a rezoning from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). Whereas, this rezoning applies to a 1.25 acre tract at the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. The legal description is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota., described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter and the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter; thence Easterly, along said south line 40.01 feet to its intersection with a line parallel with and distant 40.00 feet East of said West line and the actual point of beginning; thence continue Easterly, along said south line, 245.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 100.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 20.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 125.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 125.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 20.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 100.00 feet to said line 40.00 feet East of said West line; thence Northerly, along said parallel line to the actual point of beginning. Subject to easements, if any. Whereas, the history of this rezoning is as follows: 1 The planning commission reviewed this rezoning on They recommended that the city council the rezoning. 2. The city council held a public hearing on The city staff published a notice in the Maplewood Review and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing an opportunity to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations from the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. - -- Adopted on 1 1995. 34 Attachment 20 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Mark W. Nelson of Holiday Companies, applied for a conditional use permit to operate a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial). WHEREAS, this permit applies to a 1.25 -acre site at the southeast comer of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road. The legal description is: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 28, Range 22, Ramsey County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the West Fine of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter and the South line of the North 362.00 feet of said Northwest Quarter of Northwest Quarter thence Easterly, along said south line 40.01 feet to its intersection with a line parallel with and distant 40.00 feet East of said West line and the actual point of beginning; thence continue Easterly, along said south line, 245.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 100.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South. line, 20.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 125.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 125.00 feet; thence Southerly, parallel with said West line, 20.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel with said South line, 100.00 feet to said line 40.00 feet East of said West line; thence Northerly, along said parallel line to the actual point of beginning. Subject to easements, if any. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On , 1995, the planning commission recommended that the city council this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on , 1995. The city staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above - described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 50 The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 35 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. . The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started or the proposed use utilized within one year of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting any parking spaces between the attendant's window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code. 5. The developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall not exceed : one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code requirement). 6. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating. 7. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code requirement). 8. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (code requirement). 9. The developer shall not grade the land or remove any trees between the Holiday store site and the house at 328 McKnight Road. 10. The building official shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until the city approves a lot division creating this site and the applicant records the new deed with Ramsey County. A condition of this lot split would be the dedication of three feet of additional right -of -way for the future widening of McKnight Road. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on 1 1995. 36 Attachment 21 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING TWO FUEL- DISPENSER ISLANDS FOR MINOR MOTOR FUEL STATIONS The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Maplewood Code of Ordinances: Section 1. This section changes Section 36-6 as follows: (I have crossed out the deletions.) Section 36-6, Definitions. Minor Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels " with maximum of two (2) dispensers. Fuel dispensers shall b , to serve, only two o cars at one time. Major Motor Fuel Station: A retail business engaged in the sale of motor vehicle fuels which provide more than two (2) dispenses ds. Section. 2. This ordinance shall take effect after the city publishes it in the official newspaper. The Maplewood City Council approved this ordinance on 1 1995. 37 56 11 :..+tee -• ;�.„," .. ; ` ' - � l�� ,- � , � ;) ' � r oat; bL - • now I r ~No lo w immom I" 41MIS IIIININ ININIP W . i t. -% , .. AIMLSM mwmm Now • gmba■s P. T74T - r-7 jet; , ' _ _ 1 �l + +�� 7 ow Ism ISM i OTM ' . 4 -R o r RON! I s_ pill . olow mow _ldt� a W_ _WK SOW joh om X - 40 nook- Planning Commission -2- Minutes of 08 -21 -95 via PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ? P.M. Holiday Store (Lower Afton and McKnight Roads) —Land Use Plan Change, Zoning Map Change and Code Change Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the public hearing notice and presented the staff report. Gerald Frisch of St. Paul, attorney for Holiday Store, was present and spoke about the proposed operation. Mark Nelson, manager of real estate for Holiday Companies, showed the plan that was originally presented last September and then described changes that have been made to it. Mr. Nelson said they are moving everything away from the southern residents (and proposed southeast residents), adding 20 feet to Lower Afton Road, increasing the green space along McKnight Road, shortening the building, increasing the setback for the carwash and placing the carwash and gas islands as far to the north as possible. Mr. Nelson also said Holiday's intent was to. serve the existing traffic. Mr. Nelson then answered questions from the commission. Acting Chairperson Fischer then asked for comments from the public. Lloyd Peterson, a member of the St. Paul District 1 Community Council, said their concern was abort the amount of traffic and asked if there was any intent to widen these roads, especially because of the number of school busses using these routes. Ken Haider, Maplewood city engineer, said he was not aware of any plan to widen these roads. Dennis Palmer, 338 McKnight Road South, requested that a more- current traffic study of the area be considered and that the police have greater control of speeding along McKnight Road. Mr. Palmer also commented on the number of gas stations, carwashes, and fast food places within a two -mile radius of this area. Jerry Johnson of 2445 Londin Lane, representing the Connemara Yl Association, expressed concern over traffic speeds and the number of youths that linger around this commercial area. Dennis Palmer challenged the statement that there is an average of one police call per week at Shamrock Center. Mr. Palmer said they have a statement from a realtor that shows if Holiday is allowed to build, their property value will decrease. Jerry Hickey, 2455 Londin Lane, agreed with the comments made by the two previous speakers and asked to have this item tabled until after the open space discussion with Mr. Johnson has been resolved. He felt this area, as it now exists, fits in with the open space of Battle Creek Park. Emil Sturzenegger, 2455 Londin Lane, poke about the traffic in the area and thought the land use designation should remain BC (business commercial). Ron Hamre, 2445 Londin Lane, was also concerned with the same issues as the previous speakers. Alan Anderson, general partner in Shamrock Plaza Shopping Center, .said they have put up a fence in an attempt to control foot traffic at the center. He also mentioned the possibility of ice problems on the hill from wet cars leaving the carwash in the winter. Mr. Anderson spoke of drainage concerns and groundwater contamination in the area. Richard Peterson, 2445 Londin Lane, also talked of crime and traffic in the area. Virginia Peterson, 2445 Londin Lane, read a copy of a letter she previously sent to the City of Maplewood. This letter expressed her objection to the proposed station. Gary Ketch, 328 South McKnight Road, asked about the property valuation study that the commission requested from Holiday last September. Associate Planner Roberts said the property study supplied by Holiday indicated that this proposal would not have a greater negative impact than an office building, which would be allowed by the current zoning. Mr. Ketch requested an opportunity to have the residents hire their own real- estate appraiser. Mark Erickson, area manager for SuperAmerica, felt the Holiday Store would definitely draw traffic from outside the area. Mr. Erickson mentioned the possibility of potential problems because of the number of Planning Commission 003- Minutes of 08 -21 -95 dispensers in relation to the existence of a car wash. Mr. Nelson of Holiday Companies then answered questions that had been raised. Mr. Frisch, the attorney for Holiday, then. offered some additional remarks. Since there were no further comments, Acting Chairperson Fischer closed the public hearing. The commission and staff then discussed the proposal. Commissioner Martin moved the Planning Commission recommend: A. Approval of the resolution which changes the Land Use Plan for the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change based on the following reasons: 1 It would be consistent with the comprehensive plan's policies for commercial development. 2. There would still be a transition zone between this site and the five single dwellings to the south. 3. There is similar commercial development across McKnight Road in St. Paul as the proposed Holiday store. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this land. use plan change. ` B. Adopt the resolution which changes the zoning on the southeast corner of McKnight Road and Lower Afton Road from CO (commercial office) to BC (business commercial). This change is based on the following reasons: 1. The proposed change is consistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the zoning code. 2. The proposed change will not substantially injure or detract from the use of the neighboring property or from the character of the neighborhood, and that the use of the property adjacent to the area included in the proposed change or plan is adequately safeguarded. 3. The proposed change will serve the best interests and conveniences of the community, where applicable, and the public welfare. 4. The proposed change would have no negative effect upon the logical, efficient, and economical extension of public services and facilities, such as public water, sewer, police and fire protection and schools. If the applicant has not obtained a building permit in one year, the city council shall reconsider this rezoning. C. Adopt the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a fuel station and car wash on property zoned BC (business commercial) at the southeast corner of McKnight Road-and Lower Afton Road. This permit is based on the findings required by the code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan that the city stamped July 31, 1995. The director of community development may approve minor changes. Planning Commission _4- Minutes of 08 -21 -95 2. The proposed construction must be substantially tarted or the proposed ' Y p p use utilized within one year.of council approval or the permit shall become null and void. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, omitting n parking sac g Y p g p es between the attendants window and the fuel islands (code requirement). The a lica applicant must still provide enough parking spaces to meet the code. 5. The developer shall revise the site plan, for staff approval, if an on -site retention pond is required by the Ramsey/Washington Metro Watershed District. 6. The .developer shall submit a lighting plan for staff approval. Any lighting poles south of the buildings and fuel island canopy shall aim away from the residential district to the south. All lighting shall be screened or directed to comply with city code. Site lights shall not exceed one -foot candle of intensity at a residential lot line (code requirement). 7. The developer shall equip the car wash with a noise reduction package and keep the southerly door closed while car washing and drying equipment is operating. 8. The fuel station and car wash shall not be open between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. (code requirement). 9. External speakers shall not exceed the noise standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (code requirement). 14. The developer shall not grade the land or remove any trees between the Holiday store site and the house at 328 McKnight Road. 11. The city shall not issue a building permit for the proposed development until the city y approves a lot division creating this site and the deed is recorded with . Ramsey County. Y D. Approve the code change which allows two fuel-dispenser islands for minor fuel uel stations rather than one island. The number of fuel dispensers allowed shall not change. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes—all The motion passed. ~BUSINESS Commissioner Ma the Planning Commission meet' ime (9:05 p.m.). A. Amber Hills Fifth Addition Street, south of Linwood Avenue) Ken Rob , associate planner, presented ff re develop Bill Dolan, the develo er, was pre He told the commission that he had read the report and a g reed with it. Mr. Dolan . so answered questions from the commission. I -/ Action by Council Endorsed.. MEMORANDUM Mod 3 f i e d...... Rejected,._._. Date TO: Mike McGuire FROM: Melinda Coleman, Community Development ment Director SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit and Design Review -AT &T Cellular Phone Tower LOCATION: 1840 English Street DATE: December 4,1995 INTRODUCTION This item was tabled at the November 27, 1995 city council meeting. It is being continued to the December 11, 1995 meeting in order to allow the council members who were unable to attend the prior meeting a chance to review the information. Staff has since met with representatives from AT &T to discuss alternative sites for the tower. Two sites along Frost Avenue are under consideration and are being evaluated by AT &T. If the company, decides to seek approval for one of the other sites they will be asked to withdraw their current application. If this happens we will need to continue the moratorium issue to a later meeting. AT &T.MC ATTACHMENT- NOVEMBER 8,1995 MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager FROM: Thomas Ekstrand, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use. Permit and Design Review - AT &T Cellular Telephone Tower LOCATION: 1840 English Street DATE: November 8, 1995 INTRODUCTION Ted . Olson, of AT &T Wireless Services, is requesting that the city council approve: 1. A conditional use permit (CUP) to put up a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1840 English Street. Refer to the maps on pages 7 -10. This would be a monopole tower —there would be no guy wires. The applicant also would install a 12- by 28 -foot precast concrete building to contain the electrical equipment for the tower. Refer to the photocopies and the written explanation on pages 11 -17. 2. The building design and site plan. The proposed building would be embossed with a brick pattern. BACKGROUND Other Tower Sites April 23 1984: The city council granted a CUP for MCI to install a 280- foot -tall radio and telephone communications tower on the south s of Highwood Avenue. This facility is next to Carver General Auto Repair and a single dwelling. This facility also included two equipment buildings and a fenced yard for security. KSTP radio station on Highway 61 has two tower sites — one on each side of the highway. Planning Commission's Decision November 6,1995: The planning commission recommended approval of the CUP. DISCUSSION Conditional Use Permit There is merit in tabling this request. It maybe more beneficial to first adopt a clear set of guidelines before allowing this tower development. The planning commission, however, felt that AT &T's proposal would meet the findings for a CUP. In addition, the planning commission, saw this as an opportunity to get the site cleaned up. The city council should evaluate this request using the proposed ordinance. (Refer to the report on the moratorium and code change.) If the council is comfortable with the tower height of 150 feet and the tower placement in a BC (business commercial) district, they should approve this request. If not, the council should table AT &T's proposal until they adopt an ordinance with suitable tower -site development criteria. Building Design and Site Layout The exterior of the proposed building is attractive but the flat -roof design is not compatible with the two pitched -roof buildings it would be placed between. The applicant should design a gable roof for the proposed building so it would be a closer match to the adjacent buildings. There are two buildings in the rear of the site that need repainting or residing. If the council approves this CUP, a condition of this request should be that the applicant or property owner repaint. or reside the exteriors of these buildings. For code compliance, the applicant should also build a screening enclosure for the outside trash dumpster and the site should be cleaned of any scrap, debris or junk vehicles. Neighbors' Concerns 1. Poor esthetics. The proposed building would be no less attractive than the two westerly buildings on the site. It should, in fact, be more attractive if a roof is added to blend in with the design of the two adjacent buildings. The question of the tower's appearance is another matter. There is no way other than painting to try to disguise or improve the appearance of the proposed tower. 2. The city should not allow this inappropriate development by a residential area and near the recently purchased open space land. There is no reason the nearby open space land should affect this proposal. The question of proximity to residential land is valid. This is one reason for suggesting a moratorium. The city needs to establish criteria with which to evaluate tower -site proposals in the future. It should be understood, however, that towers may need to be placed in certain areas, perhaps residential areas, based on service needs. 3. The tower is too tall. In terms of tower heights, the proposed tower is short. For example, the MCI tower on Highwood Avenue is 280 feet tall. The tallest KSTP tower along Highway 61 is 659 feet tall. 4. It would decrease the value of the nearby single- family homes. The Ramsey County Residential Appraisal Office said that they have not seen any negative affect in property values due to such a tower installation. They do not feel a 150 -foot -tall monopole tower would cause any negative affect. A taller tower, such as one with sprawling guy wires, however, may be cause for concern. 5. Possible TV/radio interference and EMF (electromagnetic field) effect. The applicant has submitted studies showing that there would be no TV or radio interference. In addition, the applicant presented data showing that there would be no EMF effect or hazard due to the tower installation. 2 Moratorium The city code does not have any requirements that regulate commercial tower installations. The city attorney has suggested that the city council establish an ordinance to regulate such facilities. Staff is recommending that the city council pass a moratorium on future tower installations after .the current AT &T request. The city needs to develop criteria with which to evaluate future tower proposals. Staff discusses the moratorium in another memorandum. RECOMMENDATIONS A. Adopt the resolution on page 20. This resolution approves a conditional use permit for a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower and equipment building at 1840 English Street. Approval is . based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. B. Approve the plans date- stamped October 4, 1995, for a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower and equipment building at 1.840 English Street. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. 2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit: a. Submit a landscaping and screening plan to the city for staff approval. b. Submit revised building plans showing a gable roof on the proposed building, subject to staff approval. Staff may waive the requirement for the roof if building code clearances cannot be met. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for the - trash dumpster (code requirement), unless the dumpster is kept out of view behind the building. The applicant must submit the enclosure design and location proposal to staff for approval. b. Clean up the site and dispose of any debris. c. Repaint or reside the two buildings in the rear of the site. 3 4. If any required work is not done, the city may allow temporary occupancy if p �Y p Y a. The city determines that the work is not essential to the public health, safety or welfare. b. The city receives a cash escrow or an irrevocable letter of credit for the required work. The amount shall be 150% of the cost of the unfinished work. c. The city receives an agreement that will allow the city to complete any unfinished work. 50 All work shall follow the approved plans. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 4 CITIZENS'. COMMENTS I surveyed owners of the 27 properties within 350 feet of the proposed tower site. Of the 14 replies, three were in favor, three had no comment, one Owner had miscellaneous comments and seven objected. In Favor We need a stronger signal in our area around Larpenteur Avenue (Ray Wanless, Wanless Construction, 1840 English Street) Opposed 1. I would like to keep the neighborhood residential. It would bring down the value of single- family homes! Single family homes would be wonderful. What is wrong with that? Do not build town homes. (Martinson, 1801 Clarence Street) 29 A 150 -foot tower would take away from the neighborhood. (Lundblad, 1824 English Street) 3. We have enough towers and we do not want to look at another one from my back yard. We could use a basketball court or something like this. (Kurschner, 1831 Clarence Street) 4. The tower is too high in relation to the residential neighborhood and open spaces west of English Street. This land could develop according to the existing zoning for BC only. No tall towers! (Grill. and Miles, 1280 Frisbie Avenue) 5. Maplewood just spent $825,000 for open spaces not to be ruined by a large tower. All development should be restricted to residential restrictions of 35. feet high —not 150 feet. Also please no more temporary building on this site. General side is junky and unkept, outside storage, etc. Any structure on this side should fit neighborhood composition and be sided with brick or better! No metal building as proposed. (Occupant, 1280 Frisbie Avenue) 6. Refer to the letter on page 18 from Thomas Mathisen. 7. Refer to the letter on page 19 from David Bartol. Miscellaneous Comment I need to have more information pertaining to the effect it will have on the TV reception as it is located directly adjacent to my home. Also does this thing make any noisel (Bolles, 1825 Clarence) 5 REFERENCE INFORMATION SITE DESCRIPTION Site size: 21,000 square feet Existing land use: Wanless Construction SURROUNDING LAND USES North: Gladstone Window and Door Store South: Single dwellings West: English Street and single dwellings East:. Single dwellings PLANNING Land Use Plan designation: BC (business commercial) Zoning: BC Ordinance requirement Section 36- 437(1) requires a CUP for public utility, public service or public building uses. The proposed tower is a public service use. Section 36- 442(a) requires that the city council base their approval of a CUP on nine standards for approval. Refer to the resolution on pages 20 and 21. p:sec151at &t4.cup Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Land Use Plan Map I Property Line/Zoning Map 4. Site Plan 5. Photocopy of the proposed tower 6. Photocopy of the proposed building -.7. Applicant's written explanation dated September 28,.1995 8. Letter from Thomas A. Mathisen 9. Letter from David D. Bartol 10. CUP Resolution 11. Site plan /survey date - stamped October 4, 1995 (separate attachment) 12. Colored photocopies of tower and building (separate attachments) M • Attachment 1 Li �z Koh 19 RA � 22 oa J - Q 0 W I Markham z N 1 Pond A. **% • Kohlmon g W '• Gervis' `Coke v Lake : ` KOHLMAN AVE cc v Z Nfa� C W C • ��v torn C7 z 0 COUNTY ROAD' C w 23 g < lyk 7 CIR _ X � S� C -� j o CREST DR PALM F` o Z cn Z W ! w 'IEEE DR CT. p P1� CV . v? o G �` �� w Z a w IAN DR e W 5 3 Cr V) EDGEHILL RC N CON NOR g w • CON t� � CO � A � AVE. v DEMONT AVE. � CT. DEMO U O Q`. m � BROOKS AVE BROOKS AVE. o Bi ROOKS CT t" �" SEX T,�NT z w 4� AVE s aw .`; 12 • ,�- GERVAIS AVE. ?. GERVAIS GERV, M FR c� GRANDVIEW AVE. z CT W •'' ' PKWY Y ' p °O VIKING DR. •,. Lo e • •.. SHERREN AVE. .• . Kn c e ad Lake COPE L--- -� AVE. ..... • �� J LARK � CT. � AVE. � En LAR JAV �1KING DR. 6C Keller ` 25 0 _ � Lake CO. RD. v , �. j LAURIE RD. Sfwwod ° LAURIE LELAND RD. 0 o SANDH URST z AVE. Z AURIE CT. . -♦ 6 z 25 i� r JUNCTION AVE. W z iH (n Y CO. RD. a A o00 ° a e vRKE ® F. AVE. AVE. ° BURK AVE. BU RKE ® E � a--- -� t (1) CHAMBERS ST (1� AVE. 0 65 ELDRIDGE AV Q 4 v ° IN0 N ELDR IDLE AVE. 3 J&s^ Clem •� 0�`' Lk w 64 BELMONT CO URSE t; p,VE. BELMONT AVE. = Q� o� � E. 'cR�, n0441 .MAN AV. KEL�R G SKILL �` A SKILL MAN i AVE. HARRIS AVE. KENW OOD 7 - SHo ROSEWOOD AVE. N. 41j LA. Ln cc Rbsinh and ,� ROSE - WOO D 3 Q.• o R'f AN Faic RY AN AV. VE. S. J AVE. C Q �. TR� m a 0 2$ � Q o a 4 . cam• `� . FROST U' = o �'•� A VE. ALDF (A a 28 (o ) OE) o AVE. r W FE NTO N AVE. z' Z >- 4 o w -j W V o a, 0 62 W -' v _ s MI �E� A ARE f 3 0 4 °< ; J SU MER AV E. 4i ZZ GOR DON << ° FRI BIE AVE. < o OD Y `'/ a (n C 5 J ° o 0 LEY E. z N AL ' l o -! �� > A ' ° w Z 0 Y • Wakefield Y �-! • Q-' SO PH IA o Cr Lake ° 4 �- cn +- I >. -o 27 Roun '� o Z t .>OP HIA1 AVE y Z �Lakee Loke U- J PRICE Pv v 64 Pholen ► z o 3h Q ,�.� o w � O 0 . 61 62 005 10AUL . ANT I ri LOCATION MAP 7 4 N MONSOON Attachment 2 • 0 i ,`- L an- R ► OS ' Frost tA i ar atta Ave. IND 0 000� 7 3(4 0S • _ — -- a rJ2 q ' r W;� is ss ' ma a rt e rial o Saint Pawl • : O E t c o bb a � � _ m • r 3 GLADSTONE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PLAN 3 4 N 11 Q i� 918 ` 5 4 1 • ; . o ' ° • r j3 M rf t4 `p °!J 3`' K FROS T AVENUE - — - -- -_ -- 1320 IG � FROST——- ► f. 5 r .av .y nI "1 v 1 0 .in V o I 3 j _ .._ � g Z � = vT ; 29128 2r 26 25 W ui 6i _ 4 U) _ L &L HALL T .. 7 (1 : 4 _� -- "t _24a _ Z �• L MOBILE HOMES 1 t CITY -OWNED � J- a , �$ = 3, C ) OPEN SPACE � ;- _ ; o -- --.� � }.. g e) _. -,�_ PROPERTY �` ■ ■ ■■ ■� ■■ ■ r■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � ■ : z, sue¢ t , ,. 4 1, -- - 'GLADSTONE'S WINDOW " - MT -- ""AND DOOR STORE _ NONE MENEMMIK. ■ ■E ■ ■, 100 SUMMER i 1 Z ZITq's. r 4 R3 - �4 f� 3 '- •T P 7 n IT l Q �1 (qq. 1241 1249 1257 128 1 4 « 1, taw- GO • r_ � 1280 1254 1264 I ICS ' 45 7,-1 `' - - - - ENGLISH EN D NOR z 19 Za ZI Z2 23 MA 04)1 (3 . APTS 6 O L42 .. •• - - .._ _ .� - WAN LESS C ONSTRUCTI ON � - S ::. (PROPOSED ATT &T TOWER SITE) 7 2t 7 l . • l a5) 10 Cl. I o 2 = (3 1c t o - - 11 = •• r t l 20 - --� 12 _ ►.'..: 12 !,��19 (mil 12 • (p�� 13 = '• • r (61) 13 1 , 1 8 ' 14 14 17 o 1-J steA Qi 50 5v 3p 13 4 1�o v 60 �6 e fn 1 50 1A.45 O `+ ` 90 j^ # 4 a C.a� Ut lt p. _ � o f ' Lj i _.__ _ p (ill 6 PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP 4 N C GO. 4 - 75 •• , 1S 3j 30 � 2.45 T.S v O r ft (100) .. ` So WAN LESS C ONSTRUCTI ON � - S ::. (PROPOSED ATT &T TOWER SITE) 7 2t 7 l . • l a5) 10 Cl. I o 2 = (3 1c t o - - 11 = •• r t l 20 - --� 12 _ ►.'..: 12 !,��19 (mil 12 • (p�� 13 = '• • r (61) 13 1 , 1 8 ' 14 14 17 o 1-J steA Qi 50 5v 3p 13 4 1�o v 60 �6 e fn 1 50 1A.45 O `+ ` 90 j^ # 4 a C.a� Ut lt p. _ � o f ' Lj i _.__ _ p (ill 6 PROPERTY LINE 1 ZONING MAP 4 N Attachment 4 , PROP AT &T BUILDING r r , i 1 ' L ' 1 � � � 01 ' N � U r � ? Go ( r PROPOSED -- ; CONC. WALK , r , �-✓ 4J , ui \' 0 r \ 30 \ o b f i \moo z.� 1 \ � 1 \ , 00, \ , P , It (bts - - -- z l 5. i 1 ____ S. 89°41'06" W. N. 89° '40" E. SITE PLAN 10 C-i (SED 150' So. C DBE P ROPOSED z 150=FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER 4 N i. .�� _ - � �'+ __ ,�• ;.. � 'fi ti: �� . �' ipr 4f A 41 4 ' * :� s Aw arm x �7r• ��itj! � •� y� jij � yy jr IL •fir'. F • ' # « , y •X tb ,. - _ .. �''# - '- . -... Yes, a v , Y �'' Ry ^L. •, -� w �.4 ,.� � ^"_ ��'-�! 1 .. � •!.. a � �`.. .- - � ^ # ..eft .� � - . c . Iv _ a ' vi Y 4 map - � ` fi r , !� � q. ... 7 - �R l7�i .. •�. t�om•• ) yy. - - - _ n "� ;• b : t .mil �'� PRO - � +" •+i i. . tr CELLULAR TELEPHONE TOWER ii YV � s • w*: t l !�° � � L ... R A.-•_ .i . - - '�� ..�-a� ti 1n�',. ji • 1•' ��3 • . � c • . r ` �:L. _ - -mmi'vill"A4 bKt.A; 'r We. F 1 *4 40 OWN so OA f op Owl O il mmi AL 00 mmiit- 1, , .'s mill Id 61 1 �1 ION 4 r im. Allow li 1 4 1 • Ill ' �}••"""' +!" T 1 � ,,.', 1 , , h ,'`, y �t :.�,� '• 1 r ' t , .:. � '•'�` * ` r a I , -gall -Avm*l m•d 16 P 1 mmm 1 4 11 It "umm. �� I` +� I I t All, I.—. mml .� .•►,.,M...- �1 +►d" 1 �,tUµt � 1 fl'!�;,4 1 ':•`A,i',� ! e ` . ' ��'Ik ; f r W-A w Vim 7 -milli 14' mm ; mimmmill 4 10 --mmaim, 2. di 48 ON, w-ww-vw WT A Wi ill aw l Ww* W j1 Aim M u Pop" *A%L 4 " A T11 "t1j. •.,. � A w J 1 40 • AA1 . O F All IL ;Iv 14 0 l► ell 4 r • .� ,r *..y t� '''' Mal ' s 1k .x,10 AA All 0- 14. f 41 :!g r A . 4%�F • Ot '416 ML Attachment 7 AT&T Cellular Division September 28, 1995 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commission City .of Maplewood 1,830 East County Road B Maplewood, MN. 55109 RE: Conidition.al Use Permit. Application Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1840 English Street Honorable Mayor, Council Members, and Commissioners: AT &T Wireless Services 2515 24th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 612 721 -1660 FAX 612 721 -4770 This letter accompanies an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cellular telephone antenna site on land owned by Raymond Wanless. The property is currently being used by Mr. Wanless in conducting his business under the name of Wanless Construction. The request is being made in the name of AT &T Wireless Services. The fee owners have consented to this application and have entered into a lease agreement with the applicant for a portion of their property. Drawings and site surveys of the property accompany this letter. The Proposed Use. The site would be used by AT &T Wireless Services, one of only two companies who have been licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to provide cellular communications services to the Twin Cities. The proposed project would include a steel monopole with antennas attached to it and the construction of an equipment building_ to accominodatc__cell-ular radio and switching equipment. The proposed location is on the west side of the property between two existing buildings. This specific site was chosen based on the following criteria: •AT &T Wireless Services' engineering and system development needs • The need for improved cellular coverage as dictated by our customers The proposed site will be contained within approximately a 30'x 40' area. Although the site will be safe and secure, a fence could be placed around the site if the City so chooses. A site plan, drawings, and photographs of sites similar to the proposed pr( jest accompany this application. 13 Recycled Paper Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1844 English Street Page 2 The Monopole. The proposed monopole will provide the support for the cellular antennas and related cabling necessary to connect the antennas themselves to the radio equipment shelter. It is constructed of steel, is completely self- supporting, and will be painted to blend with the adjacent freeway lighting standards. It will be engineered and manufactured by Valmont Industries, Inc. of Valley, Nebraska. We will provide detailed engineering data for permitting purposes to your Building Inspections Department when this request is granted. Equipment Building. The proposed equipment building will house radio, computer, and climate control equipment for this site. The equipment is powered by 220 volt, single phase, AC electric. It will be connected to AT &T Wireless Services' central switching offices via traditional telephone lines. As a result, no one will need to be present at the site on a daily basis. There will only be an occasional visit (average of once a month) for routine maintenance. The equipment produces no noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odor. The building itself is approximately 12' wide, 28' long, and lo' high. It is manufactured of pre- cast concrete with a brick facade to meet your codes. It will be brought to the proposed site by truck, off - loaded, and set on permanent concrete footings. Antennas. The antennas will be attached to the monopole and will transmit and receive the FM radio signals that carry voice and data between the cellular system users and AT &T Wireless Services' central switch. The physical size of the antennas depends on the type and manufacturer. The area in which cellular coverage is needed largely defines the required antenna height. . Naturally, topography and surrounding trees and buildings also play an important role in arriving at the appropriate height. AT &T Wireless Services' engineers have determined that the height necessary at this location is 150 feet. The Cellular Phone System. Users of cellular telephone service include members of the business community as well as the public sector: Commuters, doctors; salespeople, business owners and executives all benefit by using cellular phones. Additionally, cellular telephones are used extensively by fire, police, and other public safety officials and departments. The system allows police and others to conduct discreet communication in the field, and it enables direct communication with individuals in need of assistance even when a traditional telephone is unavailable. Cellular phone users can contact "911" to report accidents, fires, or other emergencies without first having to search for a telephone. Mr. James R. Beutelspacher, 9 -1 -1 Project Manager for Minnesota, wrote that "the unimpeded growth of cellular service is an important adjunct to 9 -1 -1 emergency reporting." His letter is attached for your information. 14 Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1840 English. Street Page 3 Cellular is a low -power system. The amount of energy generated from a single cellular phone channel is typically about the same as a 100 watt light bulb. This is less energy than is generated by the typical cordless telephone which is used in many homes today. The Question of Interference. The cellular phone system operates on a specific set of channels set aside by the Federal Communications Commission. The filtering of spurious signals is very tightly controlled. Cellular telephones operate within a strictly regulated set of allotted frequencies between 825 and 845 megahertz (MHz) and between 870 and 890 MHz AT &T Wireless Services is currently licensed to operate in over 100 major markets nationwide with hundreds of antennas. There has not been any instance of television or radio interference reported. All AT &T Wireless Services sites must be operated in accordance with our FCC license to provide cellular service in this area. Mr. Albert S. Jarratt, Jr., Engineer in Charge of the St. Paul Field Office, Field Operations Bureau of the FCC, confirmed that the FCC has not received any complaints of interference by cellular phone transmissions with home electronic entertainment equipment in any of the five states in which Mr. Jarratt's office has jurisdiction. His letter is enclosed for your information. The Cellular Grid. Cellular service provides subscribers with highly portable phone service by developing a grid of radio cells arranged in a geographically hexagonal pattern. Each ''cell" is created. by an antenna which serves as the link between the customer and the system while the customer is within that particular cell. As callers move from one cell to the next, their calls are switched, or "handed off," to the next cell's antenna site. Each cell can only handle a finite number of calls at any one time. As the number of customers increases, the grid must be changed to handle the increasing number of calls. This usually means that more cells need to be created within the same geographical area, resulting in a new grid pattern of smaller cells. This need for more cellular calling capacity originally brought this antenna site to this location. Accompanying this letter is information that more thoroughly explains the cellular system. While the area in which cellular coverage is needed largely defines the required antenna height, topography also plays a role in arriving at the appropriate height for the tower. This is true because cellular telephone signals cannot travel through large structures or through the earth. One of the keys to cellular engineering is to take care to design each cell to be the proper size. If a cell is too large, it will interfere with the operation of neighboring cells, and callers will hear other conversations or "cross- talk." If a cell is too small, some areas between cells will be left without any service and callers will not be able to use their phones. If a caller is in a valley or if a hill lies between the caller and the cell's antenna, the area acts as if there is no antenna at all. When topography comes into play, cellular telephone service can be both difficult to provide and frustrating to use. Cellular. engineers now employ the use of directional antennas in an effort to accommodate the topography. By increasing the elevation of the antennas and tilting the antennas downward, the cellular signal is projected over the top of hills and down into valleys without increasing the cell's overall size. Indeed, this technology will be employed at this particular site. 15 Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1.840 English Street Page 4 The Conditional Use Permit, The City of Maplewood, in it's Conditional Use Permit Application and zoning ordinances set forth the following standards by which the City Council shall approve, amend, or deny a conditional use permit: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's comprehensive plan and ' Code of Ordinances. One of the purposes and intents of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan is to provide essential services to the public, including communication services. For the reasons set forth in greater detail above, a cell site in this general location is necessary to provide adequate cellular telephone service to this area of the City and surrounding areas. Allowing the cell site to be located here, subject to reasonable conditions, is consistent .with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. The City's zoning map designates the site for Business Commercial uses and is currently being used as a construction company's offices and storage yard. The site is bordered to the north by other commercial uses, to the west by a large open parcel that could someday develop into a mixed use Planned Unit Development containing business and commercial uses, to the east by a vacated railroad bed owned by Ramsey County, and to the south by a mix of single family and high- density residential. The proposed communications facility is designed to serve those types of uses, as well as the general public. Providing improved cellular telephone capacity and coverage for these uses will have a positive impact on the present and future character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. AT &T Wireless Services has installed over 100 cell sites throughout the state. In no instance has there ever been any evidence that a cell site has caused any depreciation of surrounding property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. As set forth in greater detail previously in this letter, the proposed use will not be detrimental in any way to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. To the contrary, providing improved cellular telephone coverage and capacity will be beneficial to the community. -- -S. .r Vie use -would generate.. only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. Because of the computerized operation of this technology, site visits will be infrequent. On average, less than once a month. , 6 The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and, f re protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. The only public utilities or services that the proposed use requires is electrical service, which is ample for AT &T Wireless Services needs at this site. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. See #6 above. 16 Cellular Telephone Antenna Site 1840 English Street Page 5 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features. into the development design. N/A 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. The use would have no adverse environmental effects of any kind. 10. The City Council may waive any of the above requirements for a public building or utility structure, provided the. Council shall first make a determination that the balancing of public interest between governmental units of the state would be b served by such waiver. Under section 22.914 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the FC requires AT &T Wireless Services to provide reliable cellular service to all who request it in this area. The increasing number of cellular users in this area makes this quite difficult without the proposed site. Many cities, because of this Federal mandate, have deemed .our building and monopole an "essential service structure," and therefore waiving the- need for a conditional use permit altogether. The granting of the CUP will alleviate problems for AT &T Wireless Services and it's customers in this area, including city and county departments of public safety. Conclusion. This. letter should serve to better explain our application and to answer some of your questions. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 612- 844 - 6742. I will be in attendance at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings to address any additional questions that you may have. AT &T Wireless Services appreciates the assistance that we have already received .from the City's Staff, and we look forward to working with you to better serve the area. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, G Ted Olson � Property Manager TO/ Enclosures 17 OCT -25-95 WED 8 01 FAX N0. 6125370944 CITY OF CRYSTAL P. 02/02 Attachment 8 roll A LQ�3 C�A�tt��ri �r '�ftP�wa�r�,filrt.l 23 1. 'a 1 f 1 ff:] Attachment 9 7 T to -,� -qS ...._ ... ..._ __ . .:. _._. __... 1��q ...F�►�s��!.�.. _ �V. pv�N�R D Ott P7S.. �._...._ - - -- --- � - - - - -_ _ ._.� .__ __. ._�... AI`1►.._..T1�E ,.__._._..__._._..._.._. �. ____- _........_.. ONE. ... of _ ?yE..._.._. A�So w► Vfi VON a w S S 7P, Ate. coARES�oNOEN PC �rM00lN; PL cop.D .T►��..__.!�D1►R._ESS _:_FQ.�_..:_h.._..__.... uM_�Q 1S 771- 80 58__. aN I.t k�? �S .!�►Y - - -- PM o $ d f��T Ta _ THE 10 w E R h_N b ... THE,... . ,.____ .._...... __._ _.. S O TO S AREA �_I� _.TttAs.--- T��- __...PRoPasa+._ CIA E COO 9k 6tstN_ft... 114 NS H A A . PA Oki M ....�L�_.. rl- o OPa�£ME�TS. .... _... � toM6TRvcTl_ON_ _GF.....�!..__�.g. _Sto,RY. WE T 0w %: P Sri - A __..A�� . M�C�I.� 't�R._...Su ._._ - -�. Q _ t� C c�T`� OF 51 ��L.•.. 1. A�.So �}6vE. ve B low 0 f A�RAS, . Qt_ . ?l�►E � � P�owt Of !.___.It�►!!�_...7A�'E!�__._ 110Mt_._.OF. 4 _ t �,+�RR�MT -- D �.vE�6FM£I+�T _No T v ER7.. A7T R/►t11.�E�_ .�►E...._..�� R.. ?� AT Tl'!K. P10 EASEl1apaAM _ MC Attachment 10 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, AT &T Wireless Services applied for a conditional use permit to install a 150 -foot -tall cellular telephone tower. WHEREAS, this permit applies to 1840 English Street. The legal description is: Those portions of Lots 4, 5 6 and 7, Block 4, GLADSTONE, Ramsey County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest comer of said Lot 7, thence North along the West line of said Block 4 to the Northwest comer of said Lot 4; thence East along the North line of said Lot 4 a distance of 29 feet; thence on a 16 degree curve to the right to a point in the East Fine of said Lot 7 distant 5 feet North, measured along said East line, from the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence South along the East line of said Lot 7 a distance of 5 feet to the Southeast comer of said Lot 7; thence West along the South line of said Lot 7 to the place of beginning, together with that part of vacated street accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. WHEREAS, the history of this conditional use permit is as follows: 1. On November 6, 1995, the planning commission recommended that the city council approve this permit. 2. The city council held a public hearing on November 8, 1995. City staff published a notice in the paper and sent notices to the surrounding property owners as required by law. The council gave everyone at the hearing a chance to speak and present written statements. The council also considered reports and recommendations of the city staff and planning commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council approve the above- described conditional use permit, because: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate property values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation -that would= be dangerous,. hazardous detrimental, disturbing or -cause a nuisance to any person or property, because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage, water run -off, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 20 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Ali construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of community development may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. 3. The city council shall review this permit in one year. 4. The applicant and /or property owner shall: S. Clean up the site and dispose of any debris. b. Repaint or reside the two buildings on the rear of the site. The Maplewood City Council approved this resolution on , 1995. 21 -3- C. Conditional Use Permit —AT &T (1840 English Street) Melinda Coleman, director of community development, presented the staff report. Ms. Coleman showed pictures of the proposed site and also of a similar pole in Roseville at Highway 36 and Lexington. Commissioner Brueggeman commented that it was unfortunate that there wasn't a public hearing for. the. commission so that AT &T could address issues for the area residents and also so that the commission could hear the neighborhood concerns. Comm issioner Pearson said it seemed to be a good place for the tower. Commissioner Rossbach said he would not vote for the conditional use permit because he looked at the proposal as if it were going in next to his house and he would not want it. He urged the commission to determine if they are voting for the tower or what is good for the people of Maplewood. Commissioner Thompson said he agreed somewhat with Mr. Rossbach's statement.. Commissioner Kittridge asked staff to relate to the city council that it is rather difficult to give adequate recommendation after reading, rather than hearing, what people say. Commissioner Kopesky agreed with . Mr. Kittridge. Commissioner Fischer felt this site was the best of the three sites being considered from the point of impact on residential area. Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend: 1. Table the request by AT &T Wireless Services to install a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1840 English Street, for the following reasons: a. The city code does not have any criteria by which to evaluate such a proposal. b. The city council should pass a moratorium prohibiting the installation of such facilities to . allow time to adopt an ordinance with criteria governing tower installations. 2. Table the site and building design plans submitted by AT &T Wireless Services for a ce telephone tower site and equipment building at 1840 English Street. Tabling is based on the city's need to write an ordinance first to establish criteria to evaluate such installations. Commissioner Thompson seconded. Ayes — Rossbach, Thompson Nays-- Axdahl, Fischer, Pearson, Kopesky, - Xittridge, Brueggeman, Ericson The motion failed. Commissioner Brueggman moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request by AT &T Wireless Services to install a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower at 1840 English Street, based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. Follow site plan submitted by AT &T. 2. The city council shall review this conditional use permit in one year. 3. The outdoor storage area shall be cleaned up. 152 4. The building shall be cleaned up. 5. Design review by the community design review board. Ken Roberts, associate planner, read the nine conditions required by code for council to approve a conditional use permit: 1. The use would be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be in conformity with the city's comprehensive plan and code of ordinances. 2. The use would not change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not depreciate proper0ty values. 4. The use would not involve any activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, hazardous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person .or property because of excessive noise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water runoff, vibration, general unsightliness, electrical interference, or other nuisances. 5. The .use would generate only minimal vehicular traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe a ccess on existing or proposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer systems, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public facilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the site's natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes — Axdahl, Fischer, Pearson, Kopesky, Brueggeman, Ericson Nays— Kittridge, Rossbach, Thompson The motion passed. er and Antenna Moratorium Commissioner Ros badixQpved the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the interim ordinance for protecting the plan n rocess and the healtafety, and welfare of city residents and establishing a temporary moratorium o n.. nas towers or any equipment used for f transmitting or receiving telecommunication; . television, io signals within the city. In addition, review this information and direc taff to prepare specific code a ents relating to towers and antennas. Commissioner ischer seconded. Ayes —ail -� The motion passed. Community Design Review Board -4- Minutes of 11 -14 -95 B. Building and Tower Proposal- -AT &T, 1840 English Street Ted Olson, property manager for AT &T Wireless, was present at the meeting. Mr. Olson said they had reviewed the recommendations and had no questions. He also said the city building inspector, Marge Ostrom, indicated to him that she would prefer to see the roof flat. because of fire concerns. Secretary Ekstrand said he spoke with Ms. Ostrom and Jim Embertson, the city fire marshal, and the consensus was that it probably could work. Mr. Olson said the structure is brought in as a cast - concrete building and then a colored paint is applied for a brick look. They would match the immediately adjacent buildings, at this site, with darker brown brick and banding on the corners with Fighter tan trim. Mr..Olson described the brick fascia as integrally -cast with grout lines that will be painted tan or buff color. Mr. Olson said no lighting is required at the top of a 150 -foot tower unless the tower is in close proximity to an airport. He informed the board that AT &T prefers to add towers, as demand increases, rather than raise the height of an existing pole. He said there would be no interference for radio, television or other electronic devices. Secretary Ekstrand recommended that screening of the storage area be required in an attempt to clean up the area. Mr. Olson was agreeable to providing a buffer. Secretary Ekstrand said he was also suggesting that some additional landscaping be added in the front of the building. Boardmember Robinson was concerned about the trash enclosure. Mr. Olson said no trash would be generated by the facility. This requirement is directed at enclosing the existing dumpster and cleaning up some of the deficiencies of the property. Mr. Olson said he would work with staff to achieve a design that would work well on the site. Boardmember Berggren moved the Community Design Review Board recommend: A. Adoption of the resolution which approves a conditional use permit for a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower and equipment building at 1840 English Street. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction shall follow the site plan approved by the city. The director of --community development -may approve minor changes. 2. The proposed construction must be substantially started within one year of city council approval or the permit shall end. The council may extend this deadline for one year. I The city council shall review this permit in one year. B. Approve the plans, date- stamped October 4, 1995, for a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower and equipment building at 1840 English Street. Approval is based on the findings required by code and subject to the following conditions: 1. Repeat this review in two years if the city has not issued a building permit for this project. Community Design Review .Board -5- Minutes of 11 -14 -95 2. Complete the following before the city issues a building permit: a. Submit a landscaping and screening plan to the city for staff approval. An opaque screening material shall be added to the fencing on the south and west sides to decrease visibility. b. Submit revised building plans showing a gable ,roof on the proposed building, subject to staff approval. Staff may waive the requirement for the roof if building code clearances cannot be met. 3. Complete the following before occupying the building: a. Construct a trash dumpster enclosure for the trash dumpster (code requirement), unless the dumpster is kept out of view behind the building. The applicant must submit the enclosure design and location proposal to staff for approval. b. Clean up the site and dispose of any debris. c. Repaint or reside the two buildings in the rear of the site. Boardmember Vidyashankar seconded. Ayes —all 4 y is • � e r 1 Yl r� i, MEMORANDUM �� Endorsed...._. Modim lie .._� Rejecteci.... TO: City Manager FROM Melinda Coleman, Community Development Director date SUBJECT: Moratorium about Antennas and Towers DATE: October 31, 1995 INTRODUCTION City staff received a request from AT &T to build a 150- foot -tall cellular telephone tower and transmitting facilities.at.1840 English Street, They made application for a conditional use permit and design review. Staff will address th specifics of the request in a separate memorandum. BACKGROUND The city zoning code does not have regulations about commercial towers and antennas. Staff is suggesting that the city adopt a moratorium so that we can research and develop standards for this use. The primary objectives of the zoning ordinance amendments are to protect adjacent land u ses from possible adverse impacts and to regulate antennas in such a manner which does .not preclude their legitimate use. In. our research, we also may need to define the differences in types of antennas. There.are several types, including: radio and television receiving antennas, commercial broadcast transmitting antennas, satellite dishes, and cellular communications antennas. To learn how other cities regulate antennas, staff talked with planners in many metropolitan communities. We also obtained copies of the codes regulating antennas for some of these cities. Some communities classify all commercial antennas as public utilities. In Bloomington commercial transmitting antennas are currently regulated as public utiliti because they are regulated by the FCC. Ham radios and satellite dishes are viewed as uses of right in any distri All other antennas are subject to design review prior to construction. One specific condition noted in Bloomington is that the antenna be set back from all property lines a distance equal to the height of the antenna tower, unless the antenna mast is specifically engineered to collapse within a smaller radius under foreseeable conditions. The design review process should also look at color of the pole and visual screening Transmitting towers are permitted only in industrial and conservancy districts in Brookly Park. In Woodbury antennas require a Conditional use permit and are subject to inspection by the building official. Burnsville operates two municipal towers and encourages applicants to lease a connection to these towers. If this is not technically feasible, a conditional use permit may be issued with proof of nonfeasibility. Golden Valley has a more sophisticated system. They created a classification system which restricts towers to 120 feet in business and office districts and 300 feet in industrial districts. The code also states that a tower cannot be constructed any closer to residential districts than the tower's height. Our survey work indicates that there are many variations on the issue of height. It seems that . ' virr►ihv f reairIantini area Ll 1,01 V 01 IUUIU we oome%.c b le - � LVVIUWI I I PUlt IL Gil 1%A %I iW LWVW'61-1 %.7 n There also were many variations on the issue of proper zoning classification fo antenna locations. DISCUSSION The city attorney advised staff that, in addition to preparing the interim ordinance, we should prepare a proposed draft ordinance. which establishes .some basic parameters for regulating antenna This was somewhat difficult to do without any input. from the planning commission and city council. This issue warrants discussion from both groups to establish policy by which staff can draft ordinance amendments which address such concerns. Staff has prepared and included a draft ordinance for discussion purposes. Although it is not com plete, it serves as a beginning for developing the new ordinance. This ordinance suggests that antennas be limited to commercial and industrial districts and be LliM ited to 150 feet in height. Issues not addressed in this draft include allowing towers on city open space or other public spaces and whether or not we should require licensing of such facilities. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the interim ordinance on. page 3. In addition review this information and direct staff to prepare specific code amendments relating to towers and antennas. p:lcom- deptlmoritori.wpd 1. Interim ordinance 2. Draft code amendment 2 ATTACHMENT 1 INTERIM ORDINANCE NO, AN. ORDINANCE FOR PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF CITY RESIDENTS AND ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON ANTENNAS, TOWERS OR ANY EQUIPMENT USED FOR TRANS- MITTING OR RECEIVING TELECOMMUNICATION, TELEVISION OR RADIO SIGNALS WITHIN THE CITY The Maplewood City Council approves the following ordinance: Secit.on 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to establish a temporary moratorium on antennas and towers or any equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals. Maplewood's ordinance does not contemplate or adequately address the classification of telecommunication towers, antennas and similar uses and structures. The city's zoning ordinance is unclear about where these uses should be located and whether * the city should' adopt a new classification or standards for those uses. Besides the proper zoning classification of such uses, there are several significant planning and land use issues about the regulation of such uses, including the following: 1. The particular zoning districts in which the city should allow such uses as either permitted or conditional uses. 2. The concentration and setback issues of such uses in the city and its neighborhoods. y 3. The information required with regard to the structural standards and compliance with FAA, FCC and other requirements. 4. - The effect and safety issues related to these uses on other uses in the surrounding area. There is a need for city staff to do a study so the city can adopt a set of comprehensive plans and land use zoning regulations about such uses. Such a study will address the land use and zoning issues, including those referenced above. The study also will address the city's licensing regulations about such uses and the extent to which the Licensing regulations require changes to maintain harmony and consistency between the zoning and licensing regulations. As such, there is a need for the city council to adopt an interim ordinance to protect the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the city. This also is to ensure that Maplewood and its citizens keep the benefits of the city's comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance until the city finishes such a study. There is a need to restrict such uses until the City finishes such a study and has adopted any changes to the city's zoning and land use regulations. As such, the Maplewood City Council has directed the staff to do such a study. 3 Section 2. Restrictions. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subdivision 4, permits the adoption of interim zoning ordinances during the study and planning process. As such, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subdivision 4, Maplewood shall not allow the expansion, opening or I stablishment of, or accept applications for, equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals. Section 3. Planning and Zoning Study; Moratorium. The Maplewood City Council authorizes city staff to do .a study to decide how the city should regulate towers and antennas and other similar uses within Maplewood. This study should include, but is not limited to, the following: I The particular zoning districts in which the city should allow such uses as either permitted on conditional uses. 2. The concentration and setback issues of such uses in the city and its neighborhoods. 3. The information required with regard to the structural standards and compliance with FAA, FCC and other requirements. 4. The effect and safety issues related to these uses on .other uses in the surrounding area. 5. The need, if any, to create licensing regulations pertaining to receiving and transmitting towers, antennas and similar uses. Upon finishing the study, the planning commission will review the matter and make recommendations to the city council. Section 4. Term. The term of this ordinance shall be one year or until such time as the council adopts an ordinance relating to towers and antennas. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect after adoption and publication. Approved by the Maplewood City Council on. 2 1995. 4 ATTACHMENT 2 .RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS To provide clarification on the future regulation of antennas, towers or any equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals within the city, staff recommends the following amendments: Section 36 -437. Conditional Uses add the following: (8} Antennas, towers, or any equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television or radio signals within the city, subject to the requirements under Section 36 -451. and add new section: Section 36 -451: Towers and antennas shall require conditional use permits and be subject to the following conditions: (1) Shall be located in the CO, BC, SC, M -1, and M -2 zoning districts. (2) The applicant for cellular telephone antennas shall demonstrate, by providing a coverage /interference analysis and capacity analysis, that location of the antennas as proposed is necessary to meet the frequency reuse and spacing needs of the cellular system and to Provide adequate portable cellular telephone coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be adequately served by locating the antennas in a less restrictive district. (3) Antennas located in the CO, BC, and SC districts may be mounted on an existing building or structure provided that the antennas shall not extend more than 40 feet above the permitted height limits of the zoning district or the structure to which they are attached, whichever is less. Antennas may be mounted on a single pole not to exceed 75 feet in height provided that the pole is located at least 75 feet from the nearest residential structure, unless a qualified structural engineer shall specify in writing that any collapse of the pole will occur within a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances. (4) Antenna located in the M -1 and M -2 districts shall not exceed 150 feet in height and shall be located on a continuous parcel having a dimension equal to the height of the pole or tower measured between the base of the pole or tower located nearest the property line, unless a qualified structural engineer shall specify in writing that the collapse of the pole or tower will occur within a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances. (5) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment building is necessary, it shall be located in rear yard areas, if possible, and meet all building setbacks. The building shall be screened from view with landscaping where appropriate. (6) The installation of all equipment shall meet all site plan review requirements. p: com- dvptlanten na. me I -2- Mo�� Fischer moved the Planning Commission recommend approval of ution of appreciation or �AAat�,n for her service on the Plannin Commissioner Kittridge sec Aye: T on passed. B. Tower and Antenna Moratorium Melinda Coleman, director of community development, presented the staff report. Ms. Coleman listed some of the main issu of concern: in what type of districts do these facilities belong, should they be tied in with other public buildings or facilities, should there be revenue enhancement from them, what kind of safeguards should. be taken if they are allowed in residential areas, and aesthetic requirements. Ken Roberts, associate planner, said, according to an ordinance adopted in 1976, the only city requirement for CB radio towers, amateur radio towers, television antennas, and flag poles in an R -1 district is that they maintain a 5 -foot setback from property lines. Ms. Coleman then answered questions from the commission. Peter Beck, a consultant to AT &T Wireless Services, was present at the meeting and explained the cellular phone system. Mr. Beck requested that the moratorium not apply to this application since it was submitted before the moratorium was proposed. He said the two issues continually being addressed by AT &T are coverage (providing adequate service) and capacity (providing adequate access). Mr. Beck said the monopole being installed is engineered to be stronger than the Uniform Building Code would require, and the pole is designed to fall down over itself if there is any failure. He said the radio waves are at very low power levels. Mr. Beck al said the poles are painted to blend into the surrounding landscape. Max Thompson, assistant development manager of AT &T Wireless Services, said the tower would most likely be good at this location for 20 years but the height would probably be brought down below 100 feet in ten years. Commissioner Thompson asked for a clarification on the order of the agenda. Ms. Coleman, director of community development, said staff felt it would be more beneficial, because of too many unresolved issues and the negative neighborhood response, to first pass a moratorium. Mr. Thompson of AT &T asked that on behalf of AT &T's customers, not the company itself, that the commission consider their request first. Ron Melke, an outside consultant to AT &T, identified the two other sites they had considered for this facility. They were the plumbing office at Engl ish Street and. Larpenteur Avenue and the church on the west side of English Street, just north of Larpenteur Avenue. Commissioner Kittridge said he would like to address the conditional use permit before the moratorium because the AT &T application was submitted before a moratorium was proposed. Commissioner Rossbach agreed with Mr. Kittridge. Commissioner Rossbach moved to table Item 5.b. Moratorium about Antennas and Towers until after Item 5.c. Conditional Use Permit AT&T (1840 English Street). Commissioner Kittridge seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. I - 4! 4. The building shall be cleaned up. 5. Design review by the community design review board. Ken R erts, associate planner, read the nine conditions required by code for council to ap ove a condition use permit: 1. The use w Id be located, designed, maintained, constructed and operated to be- n conformity with the city' ornprehensive plan and code of ordinances. .r 2. The use would no change the existing or planned character of the surrounding area. 3. The use would not dep ciate properoty values. 4. The use would not involve a activity, process, materials, equipment or methods of operation that would be dangerous, haza ous, detrimental, disturbing, or cause a nuisance to any person or property because of excessive . oise, glare, smoke, dust, odor, fumes, water or air pollution, drainage water runoff, vibration, gen al unsightliness, electrical interference, or other nuisances. 5. The use would generate only minimal vehicu r traffic on local streets and would not create traffic congestion or unsafe access on existing roposed streets. 6. The use would be served by adequate public facilities nd services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, water and sewer sys s, schools and parks. 7. The use would not create excessive additional costs for public cilities or services. 8. The use would maximize the preservation of and incorporate the sit ' natural and scenic features into the development design. 9. The use would cause minimal adverse environmental effects. Commissioner Pearson seconded. Ayes— Axdahl, Fischer, Pearson, Ko sky, Brueggeman, Ericson Nays — Kittridge, Rossbach, Thompson he motion passed. B. Tower and Antenna Moratorium Commissioner Rossbach moved the Planning Commission recommend the adoption of the interim ordinance for protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of city residents and establishing a.temporary moratorium on antennas, towers or any equipment used for transmitting or receiving telecommunication, television, or radio signals within the city. In addition, review this information and direct staff to prepare specific code amendments relating to towers and antennas. Commissioner Fischer seconded. Ayes —all The motion passed. S-3 AGENDA REPORT Ac - by Endorse Modif i e To: City Manager Michael McGuire Re ecte d_`___.,� From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Col l i ns e C,�. D at e Sub Alcoholic Beverage Ordi Revision Date: November 21, 1995 Introduction Maplewood's current alcoholic beverage ordinance is being revised to comply with State law. Background On November 9, 1995, City staff met with liquor managers from the City of .Maplewood. .One concern they expressed was that Maplewood still required bonds for licenses in the alcoholic beverage ordinance. This has been repealed by the State of Minnesota in Minnesota Statutes 340A. Recommendation It is recommended that Sections 5 -104 and 5 -109, Bonds Required From Licensees, be repealed from alcoholic beverage ordinances Section .5 - to Sect 5 -155, Action Required Submit to the City Council for their review and handling. KVC:js Attachment ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS OF THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ORDINANCE 'THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COLTNCII, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Sections 5 -104 and 5 -109 on Bonds Required From Licensees (dated is hereby deleted and repealed from the Alcoholic Beverages Ordinance, sections 5 -1 to 5 -155. Sections 5 -104 and 5 -109, These . sections shall be • in effect until . (Ord. No.. , Section 2. These repealed sections 5 -104 and 5 -109 shall take effect upon its passage and Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Ayes - Nayes- s' AMP y AGENDA REPORT Lion by Council Endorse - To: City Manager Michael McGuire �d�dife From: Director of Public Safety Kenneth V. Collins �' 'C Rei ected._.. Subject: Gambli Ord inance Revisions Dat Date.. November 21 1995 Introduction Maplewood's current gambling ordinance is being revised to comply with State law and to allow for gambling organizations with Maplewood licenses to operate at more than one location. Bac kground On November 9, 1995, City staff met with liquor managers from the City of Maplewood, One of the concerns that they expressed was that Maplewood ordinance did not allow for the li q uor establishment to, charge a rental fee to lawful gambling organ izations even though this--, is allowed by State law. Therefore, they requested that Section 15 -41 subd. (5) be changed to comply with Minnesota State law. Their other concern.was that not enough charitable gambling organizations were available for all licensed liquor establishments Jn the City of Maplewood. Therefore, it i being recommended that Section 15 -37 subd. (3) be changed to allow for each organization to hold two gambling licenses for any location in the City. orga nizations that hold a gambling license for their own b u i l d i n g may hol two additional licenses for any location in the City. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council review and approve the first reading of these ordinance changes. Action Required Submit to the City Council for their review and handling. KVC:is Attachments AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE GAMBLING AND BINGO ORDINANCE THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS OF CHAPTER 15 MAY READ AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 15, Article II, Division 2, Sec. 15 -37, subd. (3).. Amended. No organization shall hold more than two . gambling 1 i.censes for any location in t*he city except an organization that holds a gambling license for its own building may hold two additional gambling licenses for any location i n the city. Chapter 15, Article II, Division 2,. Sec. 15 -41, subd. (5).. Amended. A lease agreement between a nonprofit organization and an on.sale establishment shall not provide for rental payments based on a percentage of receipts of profits from lawful gambling, There shall be no other compensation paid to the on~sale establishment, directly or indirectly, other than the rental fee provided in the lease agreement. The maximum rental fee shall be according to Minnesota State law. NOTE. These amendments must be passed with the whole ordinance in order to be legally valid. Bolded sections n change ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE GAMBLING AND.BINGO ORDINANCE THE MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 15 -37 subd. (3) on Conditions, and Section 15 -41 subd. O 5 on Lawful Gambling t On -Sake Establishments (dated ) 9 is hereb y amended to the Gambling and Bingo ordinance, Sections 15 -1 to 15 -88. Sections 15 -37 subd. ( 3) and 15 -41 subd. (5) shall be effective as of (Ord. No. ). Mayor ATTEST: City C1 erk Ayes Nays AGENDA ITEM 407 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager FROM: City Engineer SUBJECT: Driveway Ordinance Action by eoun0j - 1 Endorse Modifie Rejected Date DATE: December 4, 1995 In the last few years it has becom very common for new homes to have triple garages. With varying degrees of success, the staff has attempted to enforce the city ode r e q uiring i ri n y q g a maximum 22 -foot wide residential driveway. After a recent variance request, the city council asked the staff to look into changing the current code. The following is a sam le of the p maximum residential driveway width in a number of other cities: Burnsville No requirement Little Canada 24 feet Maple Grove 24 feet Oakdale 24 feet Roseville 26 feet Vadnais Heights 24 feet White Bear Lake 24 feet Woodbury 30 feet : r Based on the number of requests for wider driveways, the apparent lack of public purpose served by limiting the width of driveways, and the number of individuals that choose to ignore the ordinance, staff would recommend changing the city code to allow up to a 32 -foot wide residential driveway. Thi is, however, only one issue with the driveway code. Attached is the 12 page code regarding commercial and residential driveways. After reading through this material, it seems the city couldl be much.more efficient in regulating driveways. Unless the city council has some specific situations or concerns it would be staff's intent to rewrite the driveway ordinance and present it to the planning commission before bringing it back to the city council for final review. This process would hopefully result in a much condensed driveway ordinance that is actually understandable and implementable. KGH jC Attachment E ..ro k OW Wml X. VIV. MV0. .4 4 f 4► sw � . - 0 Q U U O f tnw! �j Yol . • Admik • .,. • • ^.r STREE'T`S, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS g 29 - 88 basis to the city. Such partial maintenance, as provided for in this section, shall not be construed to have any effect upon construction agreements existing between the city and the petitioners, but shall be construed to be part of such construction agreements and shall be construed to be an exercise by the council of its rights under Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, to perform part of the work con- templated by city labor and city equipment on a time and materials basis. (Code 1965, § 501.100; Ord. No. 301, § 1,11- 18 -71) Secs. 29- 72-- .29 -85. Reserved. ARTICLE IV. DRIVEWAYS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 29 -86. Purpose of article. The purpose of this article is to establish certain optimum design specifications for driveways providing a means of , ingress to and egress from private property located along and adjacent to the right -of -way of the street system of the city. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.010 12 -2 -71) Sec. 29 -87. Scope of article. The scope of this article is confined within the framework of and intended to be consistent with Minnesota Statutes., Section 160.18, subdivision 3. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.020,12 -2 -71) See. 29 -88. Definitions. For the purpose of this article, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following respective meanings ascribed to them: Buffer area: "Buffer area" is the area along the frontage between the traveled way and: the right -of -way, and within the frontage boundary lines. Corner clearance: At an intersecting highway, street or road, "corner clearance" is the dimension measured along the edge of the traveled way between the frontage boundary line opposite the in- Y f 29 -h MAPLEWOOD CODE tersection of the two (2) right -of -way lines and the tangent projec- tion of the nearest edge of the driveway. DHvewa y angle "Y ": Angle "Y" is an angle of ninety (90) degrees or less between the driveway centerline and the edge of the traveled way. Driveway width: "Driveway width" is measured normal to the drivewa y at the narrowest point between parallel edges. The widths shown include surface, shoulders or gutters. Frontage: The term "frontage" means the length along the street right -of -way line of a single property tract between the edges of the p roperty. Corner properties have a separate frontage along each highway, street or road. Frontage boundary line: The . "frontage boundary line" is a line normal to the highway center line, at each end of the frontage, extending from the right -of -way line to the edge of the traveled way. Rural district: The term "rural district" means all other locations not meeting the urban district definition. Street, major: A "major street" is any road that has an average annual daily traffic volume of fifteen hundred (1,500) vehicles or greater. Street, minor: A "minor street" is any road that has an average annual daily traffic volume less than fifteen hundred (1,500) vehicles. Urban district: The term "urban district" means those properties contiguous to the street system of the city, including any streets that are built up with structures devoted to business, industry or dwelling houses where such structures are situated at intervals of less than one hundred (100) feet for a distance of one - quarter of a mile or more. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.030,12 -2 -71) Cross reference —Rules of construction and definitions generally, % 1 -41 et eeq. See. 20 -89. Use of definitions. The street definitions listed above in section 29 -88 shall be used by the public works department to classify the streets or roads, and they shall pertain to the existing environmental conditions of the property site under consideration on the date of application for the permit to construct or alter a driveway. In urban districts, where 1784 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS 429-90 present traffic counts indicate a minor street with near future traf- fic volumes predicting a major street, the major street classification. shall be used by the public works department. (Ord. No. 302, § 1 503.060,12 -2 -71) Sec. 29 -90. General regulations. (a) In the event of a change in land use or major change in the traffic pattern of the existing facility, existing driveways are not automatically perpetuated and new driveway access applications shall be submitted. (b) If the terms of a permit issued under this article are violated, or if the director of the public works department determines that continuance of a driveway access is particularly hazardous, he may, under the authority vested in him by law, revoke the access. (c) No part of a driveway in the right -of -way of a street may be used for the servicing of vehicles or the conduct of private business. (d) The area between- driveways shall be so constructed or im- proved that traffic on the street and on the property will in fact be separated. In platted areas where a sidewalk extends to the prop- erty line, a curb is required at least four (4) inches wide and four (4) inches high above the sidewalk along the inside edge of the lot line and extending for at least the full distance in front of the gasoline pump island or vending stand. Where no sidewalk exists, this traffic separation may be obtained by the planting of a hedge or the con- struction of an island. Such an island or planting can only he placed on the right -of -way under permit from the public works department. (e) A driveway turnaround must be constructed with each new home fronting on an arterial street, as designated in the city's comprehensive plan. (0 A variance from the standards set forth in this article may be allowed by the public works department when the variance will facilitate the safe, efficient use of the property for a lawful purpose and will not interfere with the construction, maintenance or safe and efficient use of the street and its appurtenances by the public. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.100, 12 -2 -71; Ord. No. 614, § 1, 10- 26 -87) 5upp. No. 6 1735 29 -91 MAPLEWOOD CODE Sees. 29 -91 -29 -100. Reserved. DIVISION 2. CONSTRUCTION AND STREET - ACCESS PERMITS Sec. 28 -101 Required. Autharizat.ion to construct or alter a driveway shall consist of a permit duly issued by the public works department. No driveway shall be constructed from or to a street until such permit.has been obtained and supplemented by those permits that may be required by ether governing authorities. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.040,12 -2 -71) Sec. 29 -102. Applications; driveway layouts; scale; form; s etc. As a part of the permit application under this article, a driveway layout of the property and proposed driveway shall be submitted to the public works department. The driveway layout. shall include buildings or proposed buildings and any other relevant present or planned appurtenances that would affect the traffic pattern. Drive- way layouts shall be drawn to the scale of twenty (20), thirty (30) or fifty (50) feet per inch. Such driveway layouts shall be drawn in black ink and attached to the permit application form. Driveway layouts may be diazo. prints, but not pencil sketches. Photographs are not acceptable as a substitute for a driveway layout, but may accompany a driveway layout for illustrative purposes. (Ord. No. 302 § 1503.050,12 -2 -71) Secs. 284030 -29 -11 b. Reserved. DIVISION 3. CONS'T'RUCTION S'T'ANDARDS See. 29 -116. Dimensions. The recommended, minimum or maximum driveway dimensions for the property site along a street are set forth in Table I. In all cases, the driveway must accommodate the types of vehicles using it. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.070,1.2 -2 -71) STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS 29 -117 Seca 29417. Corner clearances. The minimum dimensions for corner clearances are listed in Table 1. The public works department shall determine if the presence of Supp. No. 6 1 730 Supp. No. 6 1736.1 SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS 29 - 118 bus stops, separate turning lanes, skew or complex intersections, unusually wide roadway or heavy traffic generators warrants greater corner clearances. (Ord. No. 302, § 1503.080,12 - 2 -71) See. 29 -118. vertical profile. The vertical profile of a driveway shall meet the following criteria: (1) A driveway with no. highway curb (cut section): a. From the edge of the traveled way or pavement to the outer edge of the shoulder, the vertical profile shall be the same as the pitch of the shoulder. b. From the outer edge of the` shoulder to the low point at the ditch line (or over a culvert) the maximum allowable downward gradient shall be eight (8) percent. C. Beyond the ditch line (or culvert) the maximum allow able gradient shall be eight (8) percent for commercial driveways and fifteen (15) percent for other driveways. (2) A driveway with no highway edge curb (fill section): a. From the edge of the traveled way or pavement to the outer edge of the shoulder, the vertical profile shall be the same as the pitch of the shoulder. b. Beyond the � outer edge of the shoulder, the maximum allowable gradient shall be eight (8) percent for com- mercial driveways and fifteen (15) percent for other driveways. (3) A driveway with highway edge curb. a. The driveway profile shall elope upward from the gutter to meet the sidewalk,. if any, or to a minimum height equal to the curb height, with a maximum difference between the downward cross slope of the traveled way or pavement and the upward slope of the driveway to equal ten (10) percent. b. Beyond outer edge of sidewalk or equivalent, the maxi mum allowable gradient shall. be - eight (8) percent for commercial driveways and fifteen (1.5) percent for other driveways. (Ord. N6.302, § 1503.070 -2 -71) Supp. Na 3 1787 129-119 MAMMOOD CODE 1 see. 29 -119. Driveway angle. Dri#6way angle "Y" shall not be lose than sixty (60) de where two -way vehicular traffic is anticipated. Angles between sixty (60) degrees and forty -five (45) degrees are acceptable for one -way vehicular traffic where no pedestrian conflict exists. (Ord. No. 302, 12 -2 -71) Sec. 29120. Location. Driveways shall have a setback of at least five (5) feet from the side or rear lot lines, except by written agreement with the owner of the adjacent lot or where the city council or community design review board approves a lesser setback. In order to approve a driveway within the five -foot setback without approval of the adjacent owner, the city shall notify the adjacent owner at least ten (10) days before the meeting. The council must make a find - ing that the drive would have no adverse effect on the adjacent lot or owner. The council shall include the following considera- tions in determining adverse effect: (a) Snow storage. (b) Proximity of the drive to an adjacent house. (c) Difference in grade elevations. (d) Drainage. (e) Headlight glare. (f) Noise. (g) Berms. (Code 1965, § 501.030; Ord. No. 322, § 1 6- 22 -72; Ord. No. 572, § 1, 9- 24 -84) Sec. 29 -121. Permanent, etc., surfacfng 'of portion of driveway on public right -of -way. Prior to the placing of any surfacing material of a permanent or semipermanent nature on that portion of any driveway lying be- tween the edge of the traveled road or street and the property line of the property being served by said driveway, the owner or builder S'fR I VM SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS 129-122 shall contact the building in for: a special permit at which time he shall be advised as to the grade and elevation which can be used in the construction of the proposed driveway. The building inspector may call upon the services of the city engineer to assist in the enforcement of this provision. (Code 1965, § 501.030; Ord. No. 322 § 1 6- 22 -72) See. 29422. General information. (a) To minimize Site plan changes, it is desirable that prelimi- nary driveway layouts for proposed driveways at commercial sites be submitted by the applicant to the public works department prior to making the permit application. By this means, construction and maintenance plans for the portion of the trunk highway under consideration may suggest alternate or improved methods or stand- ards of construction or reconstruction to the property owner or lessee. Supp. No. 3 1788 Sapp. No, 3 1788.1 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS 129-122 (b) Commercial and industrial driveways should generally be wide enough for two -way operation on two -way streets. The use of design vehicle templates to check the plat layout is recommended. The driveway dimensions listed in Table I should generally be adequate, but variations in width of the buffer area, driveway angle, • radii, and site. characteristics suggest that careful attention be given to selecting the correct combination of dimensions for the specific site. Inadequate width is hazardous to vehicular traffic and exces sive width is hazardous to pedestrian traffic. (c) Generally, near left and near right corner driveways should be opposite each other.. Where property corners on opposite sides of the street are located such that the corresponding corner driveways would not be located directly opposite each other (skewed intersec- tions and /or varying RW widths), the near right side property corner should be used for locating both driveways. (d) Requirements: (1) No work under this application is to be started until applica- tion is approved and the permit issued. (2) Where work on travelled roadway is necessary, traffic must . be protected and flags, flares and proper barricades must be placed' in accordance with the standards of the state depart- ment of highways. (3) No foreign material such as dirt, gravel or bituminous mate- rial shall be left or deposited on the road during the con- of driveway or installation of drainage facilities. (4) Roadside must be cleaned up after work is completed. (5) After driveway construction is completed the permittee shall notify the public works department that the work has been completed and is ready for final inspection and approval by the public works department. (6) No changes or alterations in entrances may be made at any time without written permission from the public works department. (7) Fill slopes shall be constructed 6:1 M feet horizontal to one foot vertical) and shall be hand finished and seeded. (Ord. No. 322,6-22-72) 1789 Driveway Dimerteione Driveway Angle ('Y) Minimum Driveway Width (W) Recommended Driveae�y Width M Maz Driveway width (W) Radius of Curvature (R') Radius of Curvature (R9 4 Distance Between Double Driveways (D) Corner Clearance from Major Street (C) Corner Clearance fram Minor Street (C) TABLE I--- DRIVEWAYDIMENSIONS Residential C o m mercial— Industri Urban Rural Urban Rural 60 -90 60 --90 60 90 60 90 12' 12' 16' 16' 28' 32' 26' 32' 2r 22' . « « 5' min. 5' min, 5 min. 5' min. 10' min. 40' min. 15' mwm 15' 30' max. 30' mss. 40' mss. 40' max. 9' mu. 5' mia. 5' min. 5' min. 5' min. 5' min. 15' mss. 15' max. 15' mas. 15' mss. 15' nuuL 15' may. 20' min. 30' min. 20' min. 20' min. 30' mia. 30' mUL 30' 60' XY 30' 60' 60' 20' 60' 20' 20' 60' 60' *Driveway widt s up to fifty (50) feet will be permitted only by special permission of the public work s department. These maiimuat widths are intended for driveways used. nearly exclWv* by tractor - trailer combinations. Required Width is to be determined with vehicle wheel path tennpla#a.. (Ord. No. 322, 6- 22.72) m P+ (Ord. Na 322 w t 1 V R t 81d9 r� � RI t RAONTS� R � R it, Use eat 1 1 . Via► i Figure 1 129 -123 MAPLEWOOD CODE r` Sec. 29 -123, Enforcement. If the drive is illegally constructed within the setback, the city may require that the portion of the driveway that is within the setback be removed. (Ord. No. 572, § 2, 9- 24.84) Secs. 29- 124 --29 -138. Reserved. ARTICLE V. SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS AT INTERSECTIONS Sec. 29 -136. Maximum height of certain obstructions within certain restricted areas. (g) It shall be unlawful within the city for any person to install, plant, place, set out or maintain, or to allow to be installed, planted, placed, set out or maintained, or to permit to exist any tree, hedge, shrubbery, plant, natural growth, sign or other obstruction to the view which is higher than two (2) feet, six (6) inches above either: (1) The top of the curb return at the applicable corner of the intersection, or (2) The nearest pavement surface, where there is no curb, or (3) The existing traveled roadway at the corner in question where there is no curb or pavement, on property at any corner formed by intersecting streets, within that triangular area bounded by the property lines and a diagonal line joining points on the property lines located twenty -five (25) feet from the point of intersection of the property lines on two (2) intersecting streets, or in the case of rounded corners, the triangular am bounded by the tangents to the curve of property lines on two (2) intersecting streets and a diagonal line joining tangents to said curves at points that shall be located twenty -five (25) feet from the point of intersection of said tangents. the tangents referred to are those at the beginning and at the end of the curve at the corner. (b) Any obstruction maintained or existing in violation of this section shall be deemed a public nuisance, and a public health and &wp. Nm 3 1792