HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995 02-27 City Council PacketAGENDA
MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7:00 P.M., Monday, February 27, 1995
Council Chambers, Municipal Building
Meeting No. 95 -04
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. ROLL CALL
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Minutes of Council /Manager Workshop
2. Minutes of Meeting 95 -03, (February 13, 1995)
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
EA. PRESENTATIONS
1. Volunteers of America Week, March 5 -12, 1995
2. Dedication of Open Space Sites
F. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine b the City
. y y
Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these
items. If a member of the City Council wishes to discuss an item, that item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
1. Approval of Claims
2. Authorization for Additional Accounting Technician Position
3. Planning Commission Annual Report
4. Resolution for Ramsey County Loan Program
5. Certificate of Appreciation - Human Relations Commission
6. Keller Parkway Letter
7. Authorization for Staffing - Community Center
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
H. AWARD OF BIDS
NONE
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Organized Collection
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. TH61 Frontage Road, Project 93 -02:
Accept Bids and Order Preparation of Assessment Roll
2. Crack Sealing Equipment - Budget Transfer
3. Final Settlement - Cave Litigation
4. Wetland and Stream Protection Ordinance
5. Resolution of Support - Shelter Corporation
6. Drop -Off Recycling Center
7. Comprehensive Plan Change - NURP Standards
8. Adult Entertainment Moratorium
9. Maplewood Relief Association Requested Change in By -Laws
10. TH36 Pedestrian Bridge
11. Maplewood History,
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1.
2.
3.
4.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Open Space Progress
2.
3.
N. ADJOURNMENT
CITY COUNCfUMANAGER WORKSHOP
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
5:00 p.m., Monday, February 6, 1995
Maplewood Room, City Hall
MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Council /Manager meeting of the Maplewood City Council was held in the Maplewood Room, City
Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bastian at 6:00 p.m.
Be ROLL CALL
Mayor Gary Bastian
Councilmember Sherry Allenspach
Councilperson Dale Carlson
Councilpe'rson Mary Koppen
Councilpersw George Rossbach
Others Present:
City Manager Michael McGuire
Assistant City Manager Gretchen Maglich
Director of Public Safety Ken Collins
Present
Present
Present (Arrived at 5:08 p.m.)
Present
Present
C. APPROVAL OFAGENDA
The following items were added to the agenda:
H. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Organized Collection
2. History of Maplewood
3. Manager's Update
1
Mayor Bastian moved that the agenda be aporoved as amended. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Rossbach and was approved.
Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Koppers and Rossbach
Absent: Carlson
D. MAPLEWOOD 2020
City Manager McGuire introduced the subject of discussing the future of Maplewood - documenting
the Council's vision for the City's future and how to get there.
C Carlson arrived at 5:08 p.m.
After some discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that Mr. Bill Morris, Decision - Resources,
y Ltd., be invited to attend the March Council /Manager workshop to talk about the use of another
community survey. In addition, staff was directed to research other cities that have been through the
process.
E. INFORMATIONAL PACKET FOR COMMUNITY POLICING
Director of Public. Safety Collins presented examples of Maplewood programs that represent the
philosophy of community policing: Neighborhood Watch programs, crime prevention, DARE, school
liaison officer, The Partnership, bike .patrol, apartment managers association, Maplewood Mall
officer, and the new schedule to begin this summer which will :assign . patrol officers to service the
same area each time they work. There was some discussion about the obstacles that suburbs
create to community policing. Chief Collins stated that he will be meeting with as many as
neighborhoods as possible in 1995.
Chief Collins left the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
F. FIRE COMMITTEE UPDATE
City.Manager McGuire reported on the progress of the Maplewood Fire Committee whose purpose is
to review the various options for the delivery of fire services in the City. Those options are: continue
with the three independent contract departments; contract with one independent department;
contract with a full -time department; create a volunteer municipal department; establish afull -time
city department; or establish a department composed of full -time and part-time employees. Mr.
McGuire stated that the Committee's goal is to provide the City Council with an agreed upon plan by
July 1.
2
� G: COMMERCIAL PROPERTY STUDY
City Manager McGuire asked the City Council if this study was a priority, because discussion of this
item could be postponed until a new Community Development Director was hired, or a consultant
could be obtained to handle it. Following some discussion, the consensus of the City Council was to
postpone the study review until a new director was hired.
H. JOINT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STUDY
City Manager McGuire and Councilmember Koppen reviewed the status of the joint study with the
cities of North St. Paul and Oakdale. Following some - discussion; it was the consensus of the
Council that the first phase of the study, establishment of an advisory committee, would. be part of
the February 27 meeting agenda, and City Manager McGuire would discuss the staffing
arrangements with the Oakdale administrator _next week.
I. CITY MANAGER'S 1994 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Councilmem Allenspach and Rossbach presented their formal performance review of the City
Manager for 1994. It was noted that Mr. McGuire's performance should be reviewed at year -end on
items over which he has control and can be reasonably accomplished. It was the consensus of the
Council. that the suggested - 1995 goals be left as written with the understanding that Mr. McGuire has
limited control over some of the goals.
Councilmember Koppen left the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
Following . some discussion, Councilmember Carlson moved that. Mr. McGuire's 1994 .. gerformance
review be accented; that his current base salary not be adjusted: that a lump gum gavment of $3,,800
be awarded to him: and that this item be placed on the February 13 meeting agenda for formal
action. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Rossbach and was approved.
Ayes: Allenspach, Bastian, Carlson and Rossbach
Absent: Koppen
J. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Organized Collection
Councilmember Allenspach requested that the subject of organized collection be placed on a
regular agenda for discussion.
3
2. History of Maplewood
The City Council directed staff to place on a regular Council meeting agenda a. status report
on the collection of Maplewood's history.
3. City Manager's Update
The City Manager provided information about a lawsuit, two employee promotions to sergeant
in the Police Department, an upcoming meeting about mosquito control, donations to a local
food bank, and a study about providing night time janitorial services at the Community Center,
through contrasting vs.: City employees
L FUTURE TOPICS
Additional FUTURE TOPICS include Local Government Aid funding, a presentation by - Metro East,
and a possible meeting with Maplewood's State representatives.
J. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:05 P.M.
4
MINUTES OF MAPLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
7 :00 P1M. Monday, February 13, 1995
Council Chambers Muni cipal`Building
Meeting No. 95.03
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of Maplewood, Minnesota was held in the Council
Chambers, Municipal Building, and was called to order.at 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Bastian.
B PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Co ROLL CALL:
Gary W. Bastian, Mayor Present
Sherry A1lenspach., Councilmember Present
Dale H. Carlson., Councilmember Present
Marvin C. Koppen, Councilmember Present
George F. Rossbach, Councilmember Present
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: -
1. Minutes of Meeting 95 -02, (January 23, 1995
Counci I member, Rossbach moved to approve t:he mi nutes of Meeti ng No. 95 -02
(January 239 1995 ) as presented.
Seconded by Allenspach
Ayes - all
E APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
. .Mayor Bastian moved to approve the Agenda as amended:
L1 Central Hauling
L2 Maplewood Burgers
L3 Keller Parkway
L4 Wetland Set Back Ordinance Update
L5 Community Center Update
M2 Council Meeting With Oakdale
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
EA. APPOINTMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
NONE
1 2 -13 -95
IF CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilmember Carlson moved see
the Consent Agenda, Items . F1 t
1. Approval of Claims
ided by Counc 1 mer
u F16 as recommer
Approved the following cl aims.:
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: $ 619 9 521.73
334,254.37
$ 953
PAYROLL: $ 21
$ 20
$ 259
ve
Checks #372.1 - #3840
Dated 1 -12 -95 thru 1- .31 -95
Checks #16617 - #16823
Dated 2 -13 -95
Total Accounts Payable
Payroll Checks #45645 thru #45664
Dated 1 -20 -95
Payroll Deduction Checks #45667 thru
#4.5668 dated 1 -20 -95
Payroll Checks #45676 thru #45948
Dated 1 -27 -95
$ 50,325.08 Payroll Deduction Checks #45953 thru
#45970. dated 1 -27 -95
$ 352 Total Payroll
$1,3052975.38 GRAND TOTAL
2. of 1994 Appropriations to 1995
Approved the following carryovers from the 1994 Budget to the 1995 Budget:
Department Amount Account Number For
City Manager's $ 400 101 -101 -4630 Funds for purchase of office equipment
Office for Council office. (Should be placed
in Acct. 4290).
285 101 - 105 -4480 Testing for police officer and police
captain will be handled in 1995, and
these additional funds will be needed.
5,000 101 - 119 -4640 Artwork for common areas - $4,000.
(Funds have been carried over for 3
years.) $1,000 is designated for
replacement of appliances in employee
lunchroom.
1 9 100 101 - 102 -4630 Lateral file and a replacement office
chair for City Manager not purchased in
1994.
4 101 - 119 -4490 $2,000 is designated for required
training for all regular employees that
could not be scheduled until March,
1995. $2,000 will be designated for a
potential fire consultant.
54 9 765 101 -119 -4910 . Contingency account balance which will
be used to partly finance purchase of
new phone system.
2 2 -13 -9%
Public Works
500 101 - 201 -4630
2,080
101 -202 -4630
12
101 - 201 -4480
4
101- 501 -4490
650 101 -502 -4640
Computer software for project
management.
Annual financial report software
Fire Department audits
To pay environmental consultant fees
for Phase investigation of former
Maplewood dump site.
To pay for replacement of desktop
copier.
To pay for Ramsey County . joint
shouldering projects not completed in
1994, but rescheduled for 1995
construction season.
To pay for required repairs of Conway
Street lights.
Parks and
Recreation 500
101 - 106 -4390
Team
building
training
520
101 - 110 -4390
Team
building
training
120
101 - :504 -4390
Team
building
training
1
101 -601 -4390
Team
building
training
165
101 - 602 -4390.
Team
building
training
390
101 -604 -4390
Team
building
training
$112,510
General Fund
Total
Other Funds
Parks and
Recreation
:Hazardous
Materials
Hydrant Charge/
16,000 101 -502 -4759
8 101- 506 -4759
.Amount Account Number For
$ 1,435 206 - 603 -4390
57 195 204 -112 xxxx
Water 31 201 -510- 4490/
603 -510 -4490
Data Processing 1,085 703-000 -4390
3
Team building training
Development of HazMat response team
Balance due consultant for water system
modeling to be finished in 1995.
This money would be used for training
of MIS Coordinators in 1995 on various
new software packages now utilized by
employees. Due to the network
installation, there was minimal time
for training in 1994.
2 -13 -95
Community Center
Construction 177 All accounts
This is the total amount of Community
in 409
Center construction money remaining in
the fund. These funds will be used for
additional furniture and equipment
purchases, construction - related items
delayed until spring, and structural
changes to the building that are being
recommended by the users and operations
. personnel.
Open Space Land
Acquisition 33,190 All accounts
This is the total amount of the Open
in 410
Space funding that remains in the 1994
Budget. The process of acquiring
properties will continue over the next
several years.. Funds that remain at
year -end will be used in the following
year for acquisition of open space
until all funds have been expended.
$301 9 510 Total For Other Funds
3. Resolutions of Appreciation - Seniors and Persons with Disabilities Committee
Approved the following Resolutions :
95 - 02 - 13
JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Carolyn Peterson has been a member of the Maplewood Seniors and
Persons with Disabilities Committee since November 13, 1989 and has served
faithfully in that capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has appreciated Carolyn's experience, insights
and good judgement; and
WHEREAS, Carolyn has freely given her time and energy; without
compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, Carolyn has shown dedication to her duties and has consistently
contributed her leadership and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Carolyn Peterson is hereby
extended our gratitude and appreciation for her dedicated service and we
wish her continued success in the future.
95 02 - 14
JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Scott Rostron has been a member of the Maplewood Seniors and
Persons with Disabilities Committee since November 13, 1989 and has served
faithfully in that capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has appreciated Scott's experience, insights and
good judgement; and
il
4 2 -13 -95
WHEREAS, Scott has freely given his time and energy; without
compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, Scott has shown dedication to his duties and has consistently
contributed his leadership and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Scott Rostron is hereb
extended our gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we
wish him continued success in the future.
4. Resolution of Appreciation - Former Parks & Recreation Commissioner Jeff Carver
Approved the following Resolution:
95 -02 -15
JOINT RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Jeff Carver has been a member of the Maplewood Park and
Recreation Commission since April 22, 1991 and has served faithfully in that
capacity; and
WHEREAS, the Park and Recreation Commission has appreciated his
experience, insights and good judgement; and
WHEREAS, he has freely given of his time and energy; without
compensation, for the betterment of the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS., he has shown dedication to his. duties and has consistently
contributed his leadership and effort for the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS'HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, and its citizens, that Jeff Carver is hereby extended
our gratitude and appreciation for his dedicated service and we wish him
continued success in the future.
5. Purchase of Marked Patrol Vehicles
Authorized the purchase of three patrol vehicles (two for the Patrol
Division and one for the Paramedic Division) under the State of Minnesota
Contract #M -9523 at a cost of $16,940 each.
6. Liquor License - Lawrence V. Valdez; Ciatti's Change of Manager
a. Mr. Valdez appeared before the Council.
b. Council approved the application of Lawrence V. Valdez for a liquor
license, operating as manager of Ciatti's, 1900 East County Road D.
7 Liquor License - Michael Peter. Brenny; Chi Chi's Change of Manager
a. Mr. Brenny appeared before the Council.
b. Council approved the application of Michael P. Brenny for a liquor
license, operating as manager of Chi-Chi's. 2069 White Bear Avenue,
5 2 -13 -95
8. Nature Center Donation
Accepted with thanks a donation of $225 to the Nature Center from Carolyn
and Bob odegard, to be credited to the Park Development Fund (403 - 814 -316-
4720)
9. 1994 Community Design Review Board Annual Report
Accepted and approved the 1994 Annual Report of the Maplewood Community
.. Design Review.Board.
10. 1994 Parks & Recreation Commission Annual Report
Accepted, and approved the 1994 Annual Report of the Maplewood Park and
Recreation Commission.
11. Budget Adjustment - Recycling Fund
Authorized payment from the recycling fund balance of $24,995 to pay.. for the
balance of the 1994 recycling costs.
12. Registered Land Survey - Eastern Heights State Bank
Approved the Registered Land Survey (RLS) for Landmark Surveying for the
southeast corner of Minnehaha Avenue and McKnight Road, subject to 3M
completing the following conditions:
a) The County recording cross easements or agreements for ingress,
egress and maintenance of the shared driveways. These documents
shall be subject to staff approval.
b) The staff sha11 not release the RLS for recording until 3M or
the surveyor submits the final copies of the required easements
or agreements to City staff for approval before taking them to
the County with the RLS.
13. Dispatching Contract - Oakdale
Approved the 1995 Dispatching Contract between the City of Maplewood and the
Oakdale Fire Department.
14. City Manager 9 s.1994 Review
Accepted the City Manager's 1994 performance review as presented by
Councilmembers Rossbach and Allenspach and authorized a lump sum payment of
E3,800 as 1994 merit pay.
15. Gladstone Fire Department Additional Payment
Authorized the payment of $34,002 to Gladstone Fire Department, from the
contingency account, for the 147 runs beyond the 1,127 runs specified the
Contract.
6 2 -13 -95
16. Deputy Registrars'DNR Fee Increase
Approved the following Resolution in support of an increase in the Deputy
Registrar's DNR fee increase.
I
94 -02 -16
SUPPORTING AN ADMINISTRATIVE FEE INCREASE FOR DEPUTY REGISTRARS
WHEREAS, the 50 cent administrative fee. for processing Department of
Natural Resources licenses such as boats and snowmobiles has not been
increase since 1971; and,
WHEREAS, the. cost of living index (CPI) has increased more than 250%
during the past 24 years; and,
WHEREAS, public and private deputy registrars which provide DNR license -
services to the public lose money on each transaction because the
administrative fee has failed to keep pace with inflation; and,
WHEREAS, the administrative deputy registrars fee charge for handling
motor vehicle transactions has increased from x35 to $3.50 during the same
24 year time period; and,
WHEREAS, the p membership of the Minnesota Deputy Registrars Association
has passed a resolution at their annual meeting requesting the
administrative fees for boats snowmobiles and ATVs be increased to $3.50
for all services provided by Deputy Registrars in Minnesota:.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Maplewood supports legislation which
will increase the administrative fees collected by Deputy Registrars on DNR
transactions from x.50 to $3.50.
BE IT p g FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of Maplewood encourage the
.
League of MiI nnesota Cities (LMC) to adopt a similar policy as part of their
legislative program for 1995.
GO PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
H. AWARD OF BIDS
1. Four One -Ton Trucks
a. Manager.McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Council member Koppen introduced the following ; , Reso ut,i on and , mo_ved_i is
adoption:
95 -02 -17
AWARD OF BID - FOUR ONE -TON TRUCKS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CIT COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESQTA, that Hennepin
County bid, Contract 3268A4 in the amount of $71,884 is the lowest
responsible bid for the purchase of four one -ton cab /chassis, and the
authorized representative of the City shall enter into a contract with said
bidder for and on behalf of the City.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
7
2 -13 -95
20 One Single -Axle Cab /Chassis Snow Plow Truck
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Carlson introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
95 - 02 18
AWARD OF BID - SINGLE - AXLE CAVCHASS I S SNOW PLOW TRUCK
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that State
of Minnesota.bid, Contract C- 79094- 02733A in the amount of $48,138.40 is the
lowest responsible bid for the purchase of single axle, cab /chassis,
replacement plow truck, and the authorized representative of the City shall
enter into a contract with said bidder for and on behalf of the City.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
341 -Staff Cars - Budget Adjustment and Authorization to Purchase
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report
c Councilmember Carlson introduced the ,following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
95 -02 -19
AWARD OF BID - PURCHASE OF TWO STAFF CARS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA, that State
of Minnesota bid, Contract A -175 in the amount of $25,376 is the lowest
responsible bid for the purchase of two replacement staff vehicles, and the
authorized representative of the City shall enter into a contract with said
bidder for and on behalf of the City.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
L. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Preliminary Plat Time Extension: Mapleleaf Estates
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Councilmember Carlson moved to table.this matter until June 1.2,._..1995.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
2. Trail Ordinance (2nd Reading)
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
8 2 -13 -95
b. Di rector of Public Works Hai der presented the specifics of the report.
c. Councilmember Rossbach introduced the following Ordinance and moved its
adoption:
ORDINANCE NO. 731
AN ORDINANCE ABOUT TRAILS
The Maplewood City Council approves the following Ordinance:
PP g
Section 1. This section changes Section 30-8(d)( as follows:
Section 30 Trails and pedestrian ways:
(1) 'Trails. Trail sha be a. minimum of eight feet wide Trails between
property lines shall be centered within aright -of -way that is at least
ten ( 10) feet wider than the trail p avement If the trail is in an
easement,, the trail shall be ce ntered in an easement that is at least
thirty (30) feet wider than the trail pavement
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect after its approval and
publication.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
3. Update on Digital Marquee Signs for Maplewood Community Center
a. Manager McGuire presented the sta ff report.
b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to seek formal bids for the installation of
a di itized.sin for the front of the Ma lewood Community. Center, with
the monies to come out of the Furnishin s Fixtures and Equipment b:ud et
of the Maplewood Community Center.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Temporary Sign Request - Maplewood Community Center (Heritage Theatre Company
P y
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bast asked if anyone P wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following was heard:
Mr. Donal Weigert, Heritage Theater
c. Councilmember Rossbach moved to aRprove a special sign permit for a
portable reader b
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
d.. Councilmember Rossbach moved to authorize an extension of.the , temporary
..�I ._�.I�....._P...�..H.. �IY. .�^
sin ordinance unti May 15 1995 due to the uni gbe circumstances and
the .facts as presented b, Mr. Weigert
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes all
9 2 -13 -95
2. Lot.Di.vision Appeal 593 N..Century Avenue
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works Haider presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter., The following were heard:
Mr. Paul Fahning, Attorney
Donna Maki 593 Century Avenue
d. Councilmember Carlson moved. to approve ,,the lot division with the
original. staff recommendations except the cash. connection. charge is
'reduced. to 17,000
Seconded by. Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
3. Electrical Fees
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following were heard:
Gunnar Petterson, Metropolitan Inspection Services
James Manteufel, Summit Inspection Service
Marge Ostrom, Maplewood Building Official
c. Councilmember Carlson moved to enter into. a. contract for electrical
inspections with Summit Inspection Services.
Seconded by Councilmember koppen Ayes - all
40 Conditional Use Permit Review: 2696 Hazelwood Avenue
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Planner Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. No one appeared.
d. Councilmember Rossbach moved to review this. Conditional Use Permit on
July 10, 1995.
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
5. Conditional Use Permit Review: Crestview Forest Townhouses
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Planner Ekstrand presented the specifics of the report.
10 2 -13 -95
c. Mayor Bastian asked if anyone wished to speak before the Council
regarding this matter. The following was heard:
Water Sawicke
d. Councilmember Rossbach. moved to.table this permit review for six months
and direct the Director of Parks and Recrea -to to negotiate with the
town house association to exchange the trai l easement for an e, a, sem, ent at
the south end of the town house property,_
Seconded by Councilmember Allenspach Ayes - all
6. No Parking Resolution - TH61 Frontage Road
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Director of Public Works.Haider presented the specifics of the- report.
c. Mayor Bastian introduced the following Resolution. and moved. its
. adoption:
95 - 02 20
NO PARKING RESTRICTION, PROJECT 93 -02
WHEREAS, the City of Maplewood has approved the construction of TH61
frontage road from County Road B (CSAH 25) to Atlantic Street and from
County Road C (CSAH 23) to 2050 feet north; and
WHEREAS, the City will be expending municipal state aid (MSA Project
138- 010 -08) and cooperative construction agreement (SP 6222 -129) funds on
the improvement of said street; and
WHEREAS, said improvement does not conform to the approved minimum width
standard with unrestricted parking.; and
WHEREAS, release of MSA funds is dependent on specified parking
restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Maplewood
prohibits the parking of motor vehicles on TH61 frontage road from County
Road 6 (CSAH 25) to Atlantic Street and from County Road C (CSAH. 23) to 2050
feet north at its terminus, except where on- street parking stals shall be
constructed.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
7. Open Space Site X116
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Assistant City Manager Maglich presented the specifics of the report.
c. Mayor Bastian moved to forward this item to _ the P1 anni n, g commi ssi on consider its compatibility with the Comprehensive Land Use.Plan and to
the.Parks & Recreat Commission for its recommendation
Seconded by Councilmember Rossbach Ayes - all
11
2 -13 -95
80 Flusher Truck - Approval of Specifications and Authorization to Advertise for Bids
a. Manager McGuire presented the staff report.
b. Mayor Basti an moved to aPDrov�e Wed f i cati ons for the fl usher truck and
authorize staff to advertise fora bids.
Seconded by Councilmember Koppen Ayes - all
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1, Bill Knutson, 2424 Keller Parkway
2. Steve Laumer, 2764 Parkway
a. ..Mr Knutson and Mr. Laumer expressed thei concern regardi the
upgrading of Keller Parkway.
b. There will be a meeting at Little Canada Government Center regarding
widening and upgrading Keller Parkway on March 8.
c. There will be a hearing at Maplewood on March 13.
d. Mr. Knutson and. Mr. Laumer presented a video of .how they would
prefer to see the construction.
Mayor Bastian moved to di_rec: staff to report. on this at the.next meeting.
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes - all
L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Central Hauling
a. Councilmember Rossbach stated it was discussed at the Council /Manager
meeting to consider and investigate Central Hauli This is scheduled
for the next meeting.
2. Maplewood Burger
a. Councilmember Rossbach stated that at his son's place of employment they
have a sandwich machine in which they have "Maplewood Burgers ".
b. Councilmember Rossbach moved to direct staff to send a communisation to
Twin City. Vending thanking them for , the "Mapi Burger"
Seconded by Mayor Bastian Ayes - all
3. Keller Parkway
Already discussed under "Visitor Presentations ".
12 2 -13 -95
4 Wetland Ordinance Update
a . Mayor Bastian moved to direct Staff to re rr are at1 U date to the Wetl and
Ordi -nance
Seconded by Councilmember Carlson Ayes all
5. Community Center Update
a. Mayor Bastian requested an update regarding custodial vacancies.
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
L Open Space Progress
Al. r*eady discussed as J -7
2. Meeting With Oakdale
a. There will be a. meeting with the Oakdale Council on Wednesday, February
159 1995 at 6 :00 P.M.. following the OMNS Meeting,
N. ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
9:58 P.M
Lucille E. Aurelius
City Clerk
13 2 -13 -95
i.r
Aotion bi Council:
PROCLAMATION
Volunteers ofAmerica Week
March 5 - 12,1995
Endo Jim I ow -00
Modifie
Re j e0ted
Date
WHEREAS, because the Volunteers ofAmerica, a Christian human service
organization, is celebrating its 99th year of service to the people of Minnesota and the
nation, the City of Maplewood is joining in the observance of this milestone with the
commemoration of March 5 -12, 1995 as Volunteers ofAmerica Week; and
WHEREAS, the Volunteers ofAmerica is making a valuable contribution by
providing services to adults and the elderly including six homes for mentally disabled,
mentally ill, chemically dependent and elderly adults; congregate dining for seniors at 45
sites in Anoka and Hennepin counties; transitional housing for women and their families
in various counties; home delivered meals for people 60 years of age and older; semi -
independent living services and supported living services; three housing complexes for
families, the handicapped, and the elderly; and four long -term health care facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Volunteers ofAmerica provides services for children and youth:
a children's daycare program serving autistic, autistic -like, and developmentally disabled
youth; children's shelters; in -home services; 52 foster treatment homes and correction
group homes; a residential treatment center for emotionally handicapped boys; a
specialized behavioral program for boys with severe problems; and short -term after -care
for youth with special needs; and
WHEREAS, the Volunteers ofAmerica provides two correctional services: a pre-
release and work - release correctional program for men, and a jail, workhouse and work -
release correction program serving women; and
WHEREAS, the presence of the Volunteers ofAmerica is felt within the City of
Maplewood in its ownership and operation of a nursing home and the construction of an
assisted care living facility on the same campus in our community; and
WHEREAS, the Volunteers ofAmerica is commemorating its founding in 1896
and urges others to join their organization in its efforts to have public and private sector
resources provide for human needs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on behalf of the City Council of
the City of Maplewood, I do hereby proclaim the week of March 5 -12, 1995 as Volunteers
ofAmerica Week in the City of Maplewood, and be it further resolved that copies of this
proclamation be transmitted to the Volunteers ofAmerica as evidence of the City's
recognition of its contributions to the community.
Mayor Gary Bastian
AGENDA NO. E 4 *a-�
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager
RE: DEDICATION OF OPEN SPACE SITES
DATE: February 17, 1995
INTRODUCTION
e�.
' Aation by C ounc i l
Indorse
Modified
Pe i ec tec.
Date
Last December, the City purchased its first site for the Open Space Program followed
by a second acquisition in mid - February. Site #142 is 23 acres located on the
southwest corner of English and Frost. Site #153A is a 39 acre site located on
Larpenteur west of Century. The previous owners of these two sites as well as Ms. Peg
Kohring from The Trust For Public Land will be making a presentation to the Council
about the dedication of the sites as the first open space parcels.
The previous owners are:
Mr. Jeff Schoenwetter -Site ##142
Sister Joan Utecht, St. Paul Priory - Site ##153A
AGENDA NO. F -
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Finance Director
RE:
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
DATE:
February 16, 1995
Aotlon by Counoll
39ndarsod..„,„,„
-'-
edifie
Rej ected
Date
It is recommended that the Council approve payment of the following claims:
ACCO _PAYARLE
$ 1, 613, 240.98 Checks # 3841 thru # 3931
Dated 2 - 1 - 95 thru 2 - 14 - 95
100.55 Checks # 16833 thru # 17012
Dated 2 -27 -95
$ 1, 713, 596.66 Total Accounts Payable
PAYROLL
$ 273 ,874.71 Payroll Checks # 45981 thru # 46265
Dated 2 - 10 - 95
$ 50,622, �R Payrol Deduction check # 46270 thru
# 46289 Dated 2 -10 -95
$ 324,497.27 Total Payroll
$ nag -0A R. 9 3 GRAND TOTAL
Attached is a detailed listing of these claims.
Iz
Attachments
FINANCE /APPRUM.AGN
3
e
800500
SOT. PEPPERS BAR & GRILLE
PROG
SU F='E'Lw I ES
1 1 .. 0
V C.lEICOM -IRE.
3852
02/02/9
570
CI TY OF MAPL. E.WOOD
REFUND
PAGE
02/16/95
09:
3135.3
VOUCHER / lIEC K REGISTER
6504300
N(.)GBL »E »., PE I
REFUND
F•'RCIGRAM FEE
25,00
25.
F OR t"'t •• R •I C) D :I. 5
02/02/9
w
tlGtJfaHER/
BOOK
14,87
14.8
t•l M3'•5
0�: /N22 9�.
a.vW.._.. n. «uwuarr.. -rr -..... a..✓ . -.
CsIE i
CHECK
VtlHOCR
VENDOR:_
� �`E.M ::. ..: -
� TEAM •
�.a �•�
02/02/95
NUMBER
DATE
hilaMBER
NAME
DE:St R .T PT tOI4
Mt #lJNT
AMtJIJItIT
_......_ .____.._... _,r.w ...
3841
. �. . rrrr ...�._. «_._...w.w...a..✓...._
02/01/9
..._ _
681150
_r
OF• F» •I CEMAX I NC: q
..._W r .w .a.,
FAX MACHINE"
684 » 77
684,77
384
02 /0 1 / 95
68
CJr I C EMAX INC
X tS K T C
647 . 5 2
647,. w
..
t "'E :Z:� .199
F- REM I l.1M F•' /R 0E.0
t•� 4.3
.. /01 /
750740:
S AVOI Ew SUPPLY L..Y C OMPANY �
I Me, q SA F°- "TwwSTE::F•'
47 • ��
47
3544
02/01/95
200900
DISTRICT COURT
REGISTER NOTARY
25 ,00
2 5 .. 00
84 5
0
152407
C,ORBETT ,, ROBERT E,
RACQ I NST
60 M oo
60. 00
384
04 /t 1 /9 5
630910
NAT I ONIW I0 ADVEl' ' RT I :t, G
% *3 RV « AD FOR ADM IN ASST
�. I�c� 5
1. t�� ,• [a
2
�y �'
�} :./01. / � �
..
X41400
f �i:l: hihi
MINN. ATES TREASURER
i TATE� DRIVERS L..:IC FEES PAYABLE
00
485.00
84
0
541400
M ST'AT'ES TREASURER R
M OTOR V1 H rte. I C FEES PAYABt.. E
8 ,, �+ 16.50
C3 .v 1. t5 g 5 0
31349
02/01/9
180955
DAM! AN I ;, ROB
SPECIAL AL.. F /k C K . RE::CLIE »ST 42 10 E �
,�. 03 � "At! 5
�: 03 q 2 5
3 850
02/01/9
401.6
JOHNSON. , MICHAEL
TE:.RM I NAT I GIB C K SEVERANCE RANCE 62/ 10
57•.24
57..24
3
0
800500
SOT. PEPPERS BAR & GRILLE
PROG
SU F='E'Lw I ES
1 1 .. 0
1 35. 00
3852
02/02/9
570
MO OD I E w M I HAE1»
REFUND
t'1 IY BEk8 H I p
229 N 17
229,17
3135.3
02 /02/95
6504300
N(.)GBL »E »., PE I
REFUND
F•'RCIGRAM FEE
25,00
25.
3854
02/02/9
#342 52 0
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOOK
14,87
14.8
t•l M3'•5
0�: /N22 9�.
a.vW.._.. n. «uwuarr.. -rr -..... a..✓ . -.
.. 541400
- ... _ . . -. ....... : .. - : .. : .....
MIN H*.- .�- STAT .: ..:.
TR
. ... . .. . .. .. .w ua
t•yTAT'E. ►f"a I5 L» I C: FEES PAYABLE.
.uur.
50 •• 00
..
4313 56
�.a �•�
02/02/95
541400
MINN STATE TREASURER
- ..uu.av
MOTOR 111 -IA
L. I C; FEES S PAYABLE
2
2.
857_
0 2 /02 /95
32 5 00
GROUP HEALTH I NC: »
FE 19 95
PR t:•' /E, DED
3 12
.._
F "E «1':� 199
t "'E,EM:EU t"' /R 0E0
:L 4, 5:15 N t.3f�
..
t "'E :Z:� .199
F- REM I l.1M F•' /R 0E.0
..X01 » 0
? , �i C3 » 0��
38 58
02/02/9
53 01.00
MiIE? I CA CHG I CI..
FEB 199
PRE II I UM DUES
. , 014 q 68
3.
F EB 199
F•'RE :.:M.I UM DUE
17 M 326 » 62
—
FEB 199
i~'R M IUM DUE
1., 45 4 g 15
2 1, 795 . 4 5
{�.�•• /O.tw /9 4.
4. 4.1.1.00
Mir#tt•3TlJA1...�. t~"E: I hf[. =.3 r''�hlC.l
1`"Lw3 499
PREMIUM OtJ
[:� •• a :L #"
wr.. .�
» 1995
�r���:•ir{
J E. : - .. .
-
f
�: �M 00
-: :.
-
�:•t����ar
.:..vv.a..a.. nu.- •a•u..w. .sr_.ur..us.... .- .:.:.: .:..;
r u.. _
i��i�Ii�i �:cJM x���t �-
.. .• uiau _. •..• w.. -. •_..vv.. _ ✓aauu.u+
1052.
._v r ..✓.. v.u_• wua__....... _ur
FE 1 9 9 5
PREMIUM DUE.
44.08
2 01 3 .62
[. 860
02/02
(�3y 0
i7�0�.ti!NM1"Iw:
//��,
C. J.
tc •r L E~+ �J
_
40 60
---- --
340.60
[.s .3e� L
t�,�.. /4��../ wy
501400
:. .. •:
I�AOI LaC NATIONAL L.I E•
FEB 1995
.. � : ` . N .
I' lONT�lLY PRE MI Um DUE
" 'ter »v
�. 1.4a,.� «. �r4
«�r wr
2 133 'M 64
3862
02/03/95
61.050
Mid U q C. q FUND
4TH QTR
1994 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP
50,2
50.. 2
VOUCHREZ CITY OFMAPLEWOOD
PAGE
02/16/95 09:415 REr
VOUCHER/CHECR r A I STER.
F7OR F:91HKRIOD :1.5
VOUCl••lER/
260000
260..00 2
3869 02/03/955 6617,90 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIE.S' .1830
CHECK
1,4(.Jll'r-.IER DATE
V E N D 0 R VENDOR.- ITEM
NAME
NUMBl.:r-R DESCRIPTION.
AllOUNT
tHr:.t
AMOUNT
-- 3
3 63 02/03/95
042200 ASSOCIATED BUREAUS4 INC. LETTER S E R I E S L AUG 94 AMB
41,25
4 1 is25
3864 02/03/95 630770 NATIONAL REGISTRY 01- EMT REGISTRY 1::IARAMEDICS 105000 1.05.00
3) 8 615 02/03/95 51105or MARDI A S S 0 CI. A T E MI SC: O CONTRACTUAL StRVICEO 2. 950 .COQ
2 1110 is 00
3866 02/0a/9 ------ MEYERS,.4 CARRIE L, REFUND MEMBERSHIP w 1 1.2. 56 1 12. 50
3F-367 02/03/95 341650 HE-RBERT.0 M I KEG PROGRAM SUPPLIES 80.00 80.00 1 4
2
3868 02/03/95 630030 ICI .EiiST.*- HOLIDAY LT. TOUR TICKETS
260000
260..00 2
3869 02/03/955 6617,90 NORTHERN STATES POWER UTILITIE.S' .1830
6." 061 .21
k
UTILITIES 1540
3,14
.3
t.j I L. . Tl ES :1.20
4.72
UTILITIES
.1600
.45.00
:uTlLlTs1f::s 2r..5 00
3 N 1
3
UTILITIES 217
Zvi* 1.4
UTILITIEKS 771
3.14
7,
UTILITIES :57
3.1.4
3
U 3
l* *1 LI TI E:-"%:) 2268
4 to 40
41
LJ*rT.LlTtt:S 2739
3'6 14
UTIL.
I T I E' ': 1 '1902
A2 i.,63,m 17r
la
rUT I L I T.T. ES 345
()gr,
41
UT I Ll Tl E:.:,',' 3 51
79.65
UTILITIES i3l.5
1 4 6 4%5
41
Ll T -.1 ES 1457
:I.9
A
UT ILI .S I
F
T.T 10
B , 7
0
T.
U Ill ll EKE) .1698
4 3 415
lV***#TATF TF$F--sl.JR*F*p
'A
UTILT. TIES 1751
.137,21
534., 00
UT I ... I Tl E S 1775
148.16
5.
UTILITIES 1.839
BE). 77
UT:r L:r Tl EK S 1 8 50
135.71
51
UT T: L I T I ES,
5*6
5'
UTILI T IE
KS 1 913 1
1490062
UT 1: Ll T IES 2251
J. '5 4 6 "5
51
61
Ll T I E.::':*%) 2276
85 55
UTILITIES 2290
UTI Ll I'l ES 2358
111 .96
6 6.
LJ*r*ci, 24-64
LJ T J: L XT I E S 2-925
1 69 87
61
UTILI TIES 2981.
174. 7
UTILITIE"i'i 2991
1.713.85
10-p666.54
3870
02/03/95
1.90400
DE I--* T to
OF NATURAL RESOURSES
T I TLES
45.1)o 1
.45.00
7,
3 171
02/03/9 1,5
190400
DEPT.
OF' NATURAL RF*S(Jt.jR'%c*)'F:*.s
DNR REOISTRATI 0 N
-w -
.1 3 74. 00
1 Z574 to 00 71
79
'541400
MTNN
TOR Vl-.--*H LIC FEES 1::AYABI ... E
5,,339.02
5. ,339.02
I ::.ASt.JRI:-*'"-
0
541.400
lV***#TATF TF$F--sl.JR*F*p
'A
N
!:T6TF YNPoTVFP�1 I ... T r%l F F. F 5*' FlAy6r.41-
00
534., 00
VcaUt..l _ .
. . ... _
t.� I T Y Ill" MAI "'I.wi::.WOOD
PAM .3
02/16/95
09" .45
VOU('HER/CHE -REGISTER
Vtot•1i:aH1:::f�/
�{•.
gy
VE
VENDOR
I T1: "i�
I TLwIYI
�.1'•tEwC 1<
_
N JlYll� .ice
DAT E : - '
1*�11.1�Yt�.{�NR
NAME
�►�•Sl..R I l�''T � r.�1`I
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
a! /'
02/03
690400
OL•.SON M GE.OFF
SL:•VERAh dt' PAY FINAL- C K
l 0 p 480 M ?A
l q v 48q M 7C}
387 02/03/95
511 570
MASTERING CCItYH PUTl*- - RS ;,
INC IRAVE!". & TRAINING
298,00
298.0
,38 76
02 /06/9 5' . .
500650
M N R N F » A N
VOLLEYBAL.L ST TOUR . BARTi"IS
900, -
90000
3877
02/06/95
459050
I-AN I E R WC1RL-DW I DE , � hlt::
» ;�l.11° PLw I ES �• OFFICE
13.3
SUPPLIES w.. OFFICE
29,37
42 .76
f+tf
3878
0
..�V'W r X11
. 74 �.,.�,: 3
�C �.,.. ...
RAM E�Y ' C#0
_..,
..
NOTARY RE G IS TRAT IO N
-.. .,._..+�.,..,......_.... -- ....,- _- „__..,..,
.�,�
-.,,__ •.�...... -. _,.,,.....,�..- ,...,,,._.._ - --- •-- �.�..,.
;., 11
� c
02 /06. 9
4015 ►
, c a ON R I AN
REF UND ND �- h A I L "Y 1�1 I�1PERSt� �
::......... .
... :...:.. :.. .
3881
02/06/95
710635
h'I".aR RAUL..'T' ;, D
RE:C''lJND "'• PROGRAM FEE
14.00
1 4 » t)t}
ffj•`�fj••••����
M/`.! �N
02.,/06/95
()��•r•�(� \���•]/�' �
�7! "F. ")7 I TAR
(�y* {rte WARD � *) REFUND
0 MARA N Tf.M . :. »
�•• {•r�•r•• , :.:...
yam»(.
f ��• I�.� •�• ��.f.l� �4'�� � � •'
_..,.,.�.,....,. - .��.�..�.._.,.._
ms
• .
.,......�...._ - - -. •_- -, .. �....:./.`� -.- ..._._....,_
,5883
a2 06/9 p
4 5
K I RW I N g
RE F UND PROGRAM FED
70 « aQ
70 . 00
3884
02l0ea /?5
33007
w1AC,C IwlJh1 ;, DENNI
REFUND "w BASKETBALL
35 . 00
35
38.8
02
41 400
M I NN « STATE. TI"�� SV- r LR
- FEES
MOTOR � M LN � � �'�h. PAYABLE
631.38
)8 86
.R /0b
�l, ... .... ..., .: ;
I'� L hlh �. TAI»Wr.l
:.
�• DRI VERS [
i . M�. . - .. Y' ! h' L[ r !! ..
-
791
i 7 .i. r 1 0
3887
02 /06/9 5
6 5030 0
l OGGL -E PE.T I
REFUND "" PROGRAM FEE
25.
2
02/07/9
6617,
NORTHERN STATES f T OWER
' t•�T I L« •M T I ES 203
•t. 6 M 6
UTIl...ITIES 6 10
16 69
T IE S
UTfIL "IVI 1662
8 .47
UTI "ITIES 1810
591 »49
UTIL.ITIES 1810
543.33
UTILITIES.1845
205,86
UTIL:I'J 1940
JES
i .L L .1.1.1.1«. S 2019
ti �,
27.41
tYT'•.L•• *. 2 1.01
7
1 -13 2401
UTILITIES .2659
2 �'
UTILITIE'.1. 26,
265"6
UT11 ... I 95
71 2- 1 w.. �48
j
UT' I 474
18
741.
9.66
VWCHRE2
02/16/95 09:45
CITY , OF MAPLEWOOD PAGE 4
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR FUZIOD 1.5,
VOUCHER/
02/08/95
301000
GAGE4
CHRISTINE
REFUND BANQUET ROOM DEP
105.00
CHECK
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
M INN
MINN",
TEW
CHECK*
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DE SCR IPT.t O N
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
UTILITI-ES 2345
14.31
UTILITIES 2740
19.45
UT.1. 1...1 ..E E .13 ) 2100
6.13 5,21
5
UTILITIES 469�
094. 5.1G.
ITIES 169r
UTIL*
.48290 9
UTILITIES 1.944
UTIL 1 T :1 S 198
2 56. 84
UTILITIES 1995
1()112" N 7 3
UTILITIES 2575
49.95
12. 34.1.00 33
38.89
02/07/95
R'YP.Sl<l,,: JOHN
. . . . . . . . . .
REEF UND PROGRAM
t! IS 06
'2 a „
.i690
02/07/95
650400
NOLDE. MARIANNE
REFUND ROOM RENTAL
loonoo
100.00
3891
02/07/95
842520
STATE OF MINNESOTA
BOOKS
8.33
8"33
3892
02/07/5�',__i
541400
T
MINNt 8 ATE TREASURER
:C FEE P
STATE DRIVERS L I 8 AYAB
2, j *272, 38
.272.313
2n
3893
02/07/95
541400
MINN. STATE THE
MOTOR VEH LIC FEES PAYABLE
444.50
444.50
3894 02/08/95 300500 6 & K SERVICES UNIFORMS &. CLOTHING 88,03 88.03
'228.98
389'5 0*,2'./08/`9!5 842520 STATE Or MINNESOTA BOOKS 228.98
3EI96 02/08/95 5316510 METRO WASTE CONTROL COITIMISEON JAN SAC 1O
JAN SAC 102.00- 1. o
3897 02.1/08/95 5' rl5 0 2, 6 0 'MN MIME. PkEVEWT.lam As SUBSCRIPTIONS H&BF_kSHlP!50)- 25,. 00
ING It.* . 5 sk 00 125000 r. E COUNTRY 'CHAPTER TRAVEL .TkAIN
r.
3898 02/08/95 A50300 L AK
3899
02/08/95
301000
GAGE4
CHRISTINE
REFUND BANQUET ROOM DEP
105.00
1.05,00 5
r.
3900
3901
011121/08/95
02/08/95
541400'
5.41400
M INN
MINN",
ST ATE: URIEASU R
STATE TREASURER
TATE DR; VE S L I C* Pt PAYABLE
VEH LIC FEES� PAYABLE
'26 5
es '08 00
65 0 C.
52 .
1�2 1,22109,00
Z-1 -
L
.3902 02/08/95 SCHMOOCK, 308.1.3 308. 13 ��
p JOHN VACATION P/R CK 2/10/95 P/R
3903 0'2/09/95 1 '3 05 5 0 CHICAGO CO COURT ADMIN SUBSCRIPTIONS MEMBERSHIPS 00 2.
0.00
3904 02/09/95 531650 METRO WASTE CONTROL CO1lMtSSN SEMER SERVICE FEB 95 74, 1.74 .00
3905 02/09/9-5 '5141400 MINN. STATE TREASURER STATE DRIVERS LIC FEES PAYABLE 5 , 25
509.25
-.1 0 .
4 -. 7
2 n . 0 Jo
,050 25�
7
165. It
MINK, STATE 'TRIEASUREI--Z MOTOk VEH LIC FEES PAYABI E
3906 02/09/9, 541.400
CL THIN -
3907 02/10/95 300500 0 & K SERVICES UN I FORMS & 0 G
UNIFORM'. & ("LOTHING
910120
:L42 N95 308.06
TOUR GUIDE SERVICES
VAL.L.-Ey TOURS
47 .00
47.00
t�t":l►UC�I"tl«•�Lµ,�..
CITY Of MAPL «E.WOOD �'�C�I:'
,., { c r• » : �fC}.IJ�f••t�'��'[.�I�•It r. K �,G :� .a �.. �.. wy.. �. .................._... ....._._v.._ - �.,.�..._....�.W .....� ...... _.
1•' ( :)R 1'•'E: R .I. 0D 1.5
C HE.t.*K CHECK C<K VF-.NDOR W�htliOt"+► ITEM
NUMBER OATL» NUMBIER ht�tME AM
;
O C:I ' ' CJI�I AMOUNT
�t Ord 02/1 7 i t»3t)q f:+,Cl ;� PATTY L
LINE: E: DANCE. CLASS �•• INSTRUCTOR 140 140.00
9 10 0 2/10/9 5 54 MINN RECREATION & TRAVEL & TRAIN 20.
� :L :L 02-V10195 1:L CASEY •Alt REFUND •� PROGRAM. FEE YOGA 30 w oo
391.2 02/1.0/95 190400 DEPT. OF NATURAL RE*SCIlJI SES ONR LICENSE ENS E t"'ht: S PAYABL E 1. 354 « 00 1 _,, 3 54 N 00
3913 ATE:. TREASURER ER S TAT E 0 L F PAY _ 46..75 w 46..7
� ��'/:14�/�� �4i400 MINN. MlhlhtN
-� ~' 541400 M :� t ht «
STATE TREASURER �tt��'CIEC ��:E3 !«.:� � t" �iM:�
PAYABLE .�N � ��i�# N �} �.. 64 .
♦ 39 14 02/ 10/9
W
_ u. y y.4 W Y W
391 02 / 10/95 541440 MINN STATE TREASURER ♦3 TAX
JAN SUTRAX
JAN SUTRAX 8.53— 417 .. 8
•:�•:� - ,, E ?E OIJC;T' : Clht 1.2 q t 9
,3" i 02/10/95- '.�..,� «,�..t}0 t~ ur L. I C
EMPLOYEE
YE�I : , �►',�.. `
1/27/95 h' /t"o x}E DUC T I ON 1..6 . �'� ;4 » C3 �.' 2'�` ;� i i 4.28
39 1.7 02/1 7 � {� ::� �►0 RE� I t�iHART I NlS T I T UT I OVAL FOODS MDSE. FOR RES 72 725 88
9 #
0 2/ 1 3/9 5
742750
E:AWL.. I N GS , KAEZEN
REF «« BA NQUE T R D E P
10.5
10
♦3 1.
3
j;S .r
0,�..I` 1..3�
7 20 7 68.
r
E fit~ t'tt I t~ .. ..' Bo h1.K
2/1.0/95 1'" /R DEDUCTION
DEDUCTION
2/ 10/9', F�' F ...�.
31 p ,,. - •
,r
2/ F' /R DI EDUC: T I ON
1 . � �
� fi3 .1 7 5 ..83
3 92 0
02 / 13/9 5
541400
MINN. STATE: TREASURER ER
STATE DRIVERS L« I C; F PAYABLE ~
58 » 50
-- 5 8.2.5 0
3921
02/13/95
541400
MINN. STATE:.—TREASURER
MOTOR VE 1••t L..I C FEES PAYABLE
1135 IS 1.
3 922
0
980700
LINDA 1: I C: K
PROG)RAM S .• :• .. I ES
1 4 « C..0 '
%3UF *FlLN I E S EQUIPMENT
18.319
POSTAGE
31.50
yl.1i�•f:'1... a: E :�- E
b r. �' :L
?l.11�''I "'i.:. I t::: 3 1: "C� I r'I'�IC «IrIT
tt��� �5
B
OFFICE
.75
F I:::I : ::l%:3 FOR ,SEERV I CE
6" 6 5
: lad(; 3(]e*R I PT : ON & M
25.00
TRAVEL & T'RAlhtING
i to:0
«'I•ti�.I(,�� tl'rl laf:•'�•'l..I L :.L•)
3:0.83
l E.t••11: � 11...1.:. AIWLOWAt� C%ri -'
3'i. J�.5
T•I•.ZAVEL.. & TRAINING
7 - 5
S (Jl:•'PI... I IES .... E- -Q a I l••'MENT
3
.. .. EG
5..0
149.24
y
02/1.4/96
5 0042 7
M M » t M M - A N
TR A�lt LN : TRAINING
M 0
„ c a
• }r 214
02/14/95 i .....�.� _..
. ..:.:y...y..:..�_..
_2 r 5 x•02
LL..�.y:.:�....y . .tiw.W.. : ,.�..W._....... -: . :. w�.
F r. M N A N M N
.�...:....�.:.� T _.:. �.. .r._..�.._.....��........W.y... �.. ,........
II
TE'�A�lE :- *I ... • - N N6
�....��r... �_.W..... _ w.�V....�u....�...
._.....
2
_��_....�.. _._ �... ��. __ _.....w.�
;�-
125 "00
3 02/t4/95 861 6 06 TI:—:.X--WIPE COMPANY SUPPLIES 17-QU I I - ENT , 7 7 a It 00
Ali taEa�tf:41~" CTTY OF MAPLEWOOD
PAGE
02/1.6/?5 09:45 VOUCFIFR/rI-4ECK REGISTER
1::'(:)R Fol:.*.-.R:I:OD 15.
VOUCHER/
REPAIR
& MAINT/VEHICLE
159.86
REPAIR
& VIA I NT/VEI-II
NUMBER
C.11-1ECK
DATE.
VENDOR
NUMBE
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
I TEM
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
3926
a9 7
02/14/95
02/14/95
630060
330650
N.S,P,Ea
HEALTH PARTNERS
REFUND•DUP PMT 9417885
227.00
472.60
227.00
472..60
3928
02/14/95
190400
DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURSES
. .... ......... ...... . . .. ..
PMT CORRECT ERRO
4.00
4.00
3) 9 2 9
'3930
02/14/95
02/14/95
541400
541400
MINN, STATE TREASURER
Est INNa STATE TREASURER
MOTOR VEH L IC FEES PAYABLE
STATE DRIVERS -LIC FEES PAYABLE
2
536,50
2..1046.07
536,50
3931
071./t4/95
4 59O t-
LAND TITLE. INC a
-------- - -----
OStN0 OPEN SPACE SITE #153A
-04.00
--
1, 05 604,00
..s
'r
02/25�796
10
5
0104r,
A.T.O.Ma
MEMBERM -IIP
20.00
20.00
16834 02/27/95 010575 ACE HARDWARE StJPPL IES - EQUIPMENT 3*. 63
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL V V3 y N , 73
S --*PL
Ur -IES JANITORIAL 143 ,92
'UPF'L* ES JANITORIAL
.... . . 0-10. 511 541,79
16835 02/27/95 010650 ADAMS DAVE
FAMILY SNOWSHOr---- CANCELLATION
6,00
FET.4 V
.1.68 36 02/227/95 02.0400 AIRStGNAL -I ESC. CE PAGEk
- v o
-EP 9c,5 .3
PAGERr RENTAL 1 21,0
34 60
020825 ALL RITE EKLECTRIC COMPANY REPAIRS & MTNCE./Eb- 162,00
162.00
16838 02/27/95 021200 AMERICAN rASTENER SUPF'LIES -- VEHICLE 21,46
21.46
1.6839 0'2 1. 1.22 7 9 5 '0212,50 AME-RICAN LINEN SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS
62 37
`0
MAINTENANCE MATE »E"
3 5%. 2
16840 02/,'27/95 030375 ANDERSON BRUCE K
TRAVEL &. -TRAINING
117.31
6.00 -
117.31
ON r 5V ... r
16841. 02/ 03 04 2-0 AND5.Rs, E E T 1 BLDG tNSP JAN 9'5
p 3)(37. 50
0
)06
0 E kV 1 C E- 8 INC* A141MAL CONTROL SER VI CES 1 "584 10
'e.7/9
16842 AN T mAL. cONTkOL
1.6843 02/27/95
16844 02/27/Y5
031.100 APPEARANCE PLUS CAR WASHES 127.26r
CAR WASHES 36.40
CA R WASHES
0408'50 ARMCOM DI STRI BUT IN OUP 'LIE E QUI PMENT
16845 02/27/95 040915 ARNALS AUTO S 1-7. R V I C E
REPAIR
& MAINT/VEHICLE
159.86
REPAIR
& VIA I NT/VEI-II
714.11
1.6846 02/27/95 .041.200 ARROWWOOD mD IS.
1 3 0 N RE . T '
TRAVEL.
& TRAINING
'1 'A .6
16847 02/27/95 041400 AM Fl.
%3 % TERRI
KE
:
- W - E - N - - T - E - - R 'A FT S
1B.00
C 1-'^:r PHASE I
-REV I EV OPEN - SPACEF. S, T TE 1,200.00
68. 50
873.97
18.00
VOUCHRE..22
CITY Or MAI+ EWOOD
'�
,. 09 » 4 � AC�� -7
0/1.
6 /9
,
Vcat:1C:1•4E
-
CL•11» K
:hiDC��'4
+hlhOK
T M
CLACK
NUMBER
DATE
Nt.11YlBl::a"•+;
NAME
lf?r-SCh; I!~'T Lt]h1
Ah!iCltJ1�IT
AM0UN*r
. L r 61
02 /27/9 5 5
042 5 1 5
ASSN OF PUBLIC SAFETY COITI EUN N
1995 DUES
62.00
62.00
16 850
02/27/9 5
060090
Di : A /t= OR DNS I i s SCIENCE LAB
T R AV EL TR
N 00
• 4 0
••
TRAVEL & TRAINING
410 N 0
T RAVEL. EL r7: TRAINING
40,
•
T V I,,. rY 1 ' tii' 1 1:1
1. 1~l .� ht ::
r�
40 N 0!
TRAVEL & TRAINING
40 . 00
TRAVEL . 'TR
40,00
240
.1-6851
02/27/95
Ot�a01.+}0
A1:I�II1 �.i...t'irll• «.hiT
T
1.+ K}C� .
TRAVEL. & TRAINING
i 2:.0 0 00
:rr 1i l�l x hlt
400s.00
. 16852
02/27/95
060400
BAC:HI'r AN ' S CREDIT DEPARTMENT
FINANCE C;HO
10,83
10.83
1. t a
t}�"':. 2 7 /'�' Vii :
0
C K �`1f:�C�it
,,
.� L IES
,
"'� r}�'�`l
3 4. n 0�l
1 613 r - 5 4
�••
}.�..�' 7 �'9
( } 1..L 00Ah1
L..L.Y N N
,
� 'f.• �.'�'`.t f
NUA .Y a.7
66 6 M
��Al�It.1AtZY S I ..I: S
641. .e:.5
5 ., 30 N 40
1. 6 8 55
02 /27/9 5
061480
BARNES & NOBLE
BOOKS
120,47
.120.
16856
02/2 7/95
061 800
BATTERIES PLUS
�U� 1" - *LIES •� �+I. H � C;�.. -E
43 w G?
SUPPLIES VEHICLE
87.3
173
1.
02/27/95
0703
B Dh ARE K ., M I ME
R EPAIR & MA I NIT /BU I LD :I: NGS
100 » 00
10010
}../27 5
+x}71 A?00
BEST BUY CO
HP DESK 1000 & :.CALF •:..
11 2110
,02
.1. ctrl ,a9
02/27/9 5
0714:�p
D I �• ��
SAT N ��C- »
.
5
SAT SVC N
5 8 ,26
1.1.6 N :.y2
1.6860
02/2- ., ray/ �
0 �
1
��[ �
�.�Aht K 9 I�IAI�IDLI
350
1 6861.
02/2
09140
UD l� I C KAf ~: lit
r . . �. _.
00
�}
1 686
02/2.7/9
101 a 50
BUILDERS SQUARE
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
106,55
_
St.) Pl:: 'L ..IES •� EQUIPMENT
-- -- - -- -
2 5 .4 0
1.a :L N 9 ti
1. 6863
02/27/95
1.0.1.874
DUS I »ES) S EDUCATION Ohl ERR
5 ,5402 -9 50316 s M I NAR
♦ /� j
1.74 k t }0
xMMI~ -551. -95 X1.7 SEMINAR
87 00
16864
02/27/95
1.10065
C.C. SHARROW CO. I NC** N
%SU1" PL I ES - VEHICLE
278 « 96
SlIALL TOOLS
85.65
364
t6(365
0,�../
:1.1.01. ,. 0
5
C a S . C . ' . t I* iI:::D I:T �• "al .l"•�t�+ I Cl:"
!~ I" »l:��i I� t �i !'::.I' V I CF.::
30»00 .
30.00
�. tiµ ..
.�
:1.1.O,: 90
C AF I TCII... �s't.1x BER c. TAI"11:' ia: ?h'il�' ANY
.y., w.._,.. ._.. W.....,_.._ ........_....,.........._...... w ................ y....... ...,.W..,.._,..,....W..,.._.
�aUF�'I':'I....T. �:c.} .... C)1:"L� :L Cf ::
_..,
40 .4 8
40.48 .. _.
1.686
02/2
11
CAI 1...1 ": E JEANl -
VEHICLE ALI ... CIU A1%1t %FE
20 ., no
Vt)UCHRE2
02/27/95
200660
DIGITAL RESOURCE
CITY
OF, MAPLE:_*WOOD
.19 40, 1 5
'AGE 8
02/16/95
09:45
AE R -i r.
VOUCI %/Ci :.c.K RF_:GISTER yvr
02/27/95
210084
..DOLINSKI., SYLVtA
REFUND* PIRTHDAY PARTY
20600
2 "00
14 A
VOUCHEI:Z/
210275
D64 .)ERVIC E:
S DOOR c CO. INC.
REF:AIR & ITIAI RT/BUILDINGS
4955.00
CFIE:.:(*,**K
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
f-T EM
'
536,28
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCr
RIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUN*r
1. 8
02/27/95
120515
CEENTRAL STORES
� . . 60
•
SUPPLIE*_-S OF*F**ICF.
.....d..u.y..W.,,v.. w.. ......:._..�....y..wr.....,._
36.18
_.._..�...._.....a _ : _
230900
EASTMAN KODAK COMl::lANY,
DUPLICATING COSTS
-lw06
SUPPLIES OFFICE
49.1.6
85.34
1.6869
02/227/95-
V"Z. 0 615 0
CERTIFIED LAVORATORIEM
CHEMICALS
DUl::l_I(*o%ATIl%l(*3** COSTS
71,90
167082
16870
02/27/95
13 1 250
CITfZENS:,LEAGU
B WKS
:2100
2 00
16871
02/27/95
140435
CO—OP VACUUM & JANITORIAL
SUP
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
i3e.03
138.03
.1 . 6 8 7 2%
0a 27% 9 5
f1wil "o
C014T 1 N04 tAL. SAMT Y EQU I P
SUPPLIES EQU IPMENT.
41 ', 5 4
41 o,' 54
6 8 73
02-- '/ 5
i52250
COORDINATED BUS INE.:*SS SYS"
LTD
SUPPLIES OFFICE
3721,93-
372.93
16874
02/27/95
162000
CUDE* LARRY J,
TRAVEL & TRAINING
37,.00
37,00
16875
02/27/96
170400
SUPPLIES E Q-U I P"MENIT
DUl:-`l ... I(*4%ATING COSTS
4.8 ,..a0
16876
02/27/95
180110
..DENTALCLAI S C RUN,02 03-95
�� � a ��
695 68
16877
02/27/95
180420
DAHL RICHARD
REF7UND PRESCHOOL SNOWSHOEING
4.00
4.00
6878 02/27/95 . 818154.1
16879 02/27/95 190175
DAVIS LOCK SAF E SUPPLIES EaUTFIME-N 26 8
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 0 40 ' 28
i7o:
DEMCO 66RAM SUPPLIES 70,22 70..22
16880
02/27/95
200660
DIGITAL RESOURCE
COMPLETE CIVIL BUNDLE
5v940.15
.19 40, 1 5
16881
02/27/95
210084
..DOLINSKI., SYLVtA
REFUND* PIRTHDAY PARTY
20600
2 "00
14 A
210275
D64 .)ERVIC E:
S DOOR c CO. INC.
REF:AIR & ITIAI RT/BUILDINGS
4955.00
%SUPPLIES EQtJll::'Ml:-714T
41.28
536,28
16883
02/27/95
21065-6,
R, I V E K4 _S LICENSE1 GUIDE.*. CON.
L J P F-"' L I F .".S � : F.T. C F~
� . . 60
6 c5 iW
16884
02/27/95
230900
EASTMAN KODAK COMl::lANY,
DUPLICATING COSTS
-lw06
DUPLICATING COSTS
4n03
DUl::l_I(*o%ATIl%l(*3** COSTS
71,90
CAT I NO COSTS
5
162.53
DUPLI CAT 1. NOP COSTS
104w39,
DUI`L ... CATING %3TS
CDC
c
DtJl--"I.. I CAT I NG COSTS
DUI::9LI CAT ING3 COSTS
1'54. 76
DUl-'LI(*4%-ATIN(*3) COSTS
56.1.3
COSTS
1.96
DUl:-`l ... I(*4%ATING COSTS
35"07
DL)Flb. I CAT . 1 NG COS )T
79,28
DUPLICATING COC'
DI COSTS
26. 53
DUPLICATING COSTS
131...29
F�OFITS
7p r' It-*>
VOUCHRE2 C.1 TY OF MA1~ L EWOOD PAGI
02/16/95 09:4 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
1*7OR 115
VOUCHER/
C;!'•IF:•t.*. K
CHEC
VENDOR.
VE NDOR DOD
I fEM
E
1�1
HECK
NUMBER
DAT "E:
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOl:1hIT
AIYIOIJ>tIT
. ... .. ...._...._W.__�...._.._._._. ,......,_._
:� c5C3f•3;�
... ._. .. �. .wu....V.._...W..w.......w
D '/�'7/ �
._.__ ....._.�,y.Y.r.,......_......
,�': 1. } ?
... ..y.............M..,..w - -. .. ......r..Y...LL .............
E�DUCAL «C
......... - .y.....W _...LL.. _......... _....4.,_r...... . _ ...,_
Sl.IE'E''L I E'S- EQUIPMENT
_..._ ..,_. _ .......,.__.__.w_�._.._w
30 w 9
.......... y......�......�...._......._... _._ ...y.._..�... _._.y.....,_ _�.._._.
a0 5
1 . 6# S
0 2/27/ 9 5
2 3 1.6 50
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE
WPW I N 6 . 0 UP
9
LOT US FOR WINDOWS 5.0 W{ ' i.J
IN ��4 M 6 5 : � ����
�� �. � .M �'w}44M _4"'T
16887
02/.27/9 5
240375
EMERGENCY APP M A I NT a
REPAI & MA I NT/VE I CL..
204A8, 4G
204.48
1 6813 1 3
02 /27/9 5
2 50 060
E•hIClFiAF''M C.S M I'NC M
Gh15 GhtAL
""7 M I �..
SIG & S IGN AL S
14..
2 9..43
1 6 1389
02
x 604 50
FEED-RITE CONTROLS I NCf *
CH M I cAL s
27.9 M 80
- - -
279 80
1
02
300 500
G & K SERV
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
S 1. . 2 #3
UN I F & CLOTHING
283.5
UNIFORMS & CLOTHING
163.72
UNI FORMS & CL+O THING
222.96
UN 1F- ORMS & CLOTHING
9 5 w 2 1.
r �y rs t r 1 ,
Uhl: E' ORM � t L «t: Tt4I NG
Q� w ��} �
�»y ,�+�
T �c�:. 7 w 04
1.6891
02/27/95
301650
GENERAL OFFI PRODUCT
REP AIR & MA I NT /EQUI PMENT
22.07
22 07
16 B92
0 /�7/9
IS 02 10 q
GEaIta I t�lE E'AT'S C:CIMI"'AtY
REPAIR MA 11�IT'1E.wI I CfL..
1. « 4f3;
11,48
1 6893
02 /2:.7/9 w
30. _........ ...,._.._....._..
GL«AD P I Re DC: PT ,.
TRAVEL.. ,�► TRAINING
409 w 9 0 .
.._..._. ... �. . w.._....... ......_....._.._._,_....___
_.._.._. . ... r.. ..............._._._._.V.._..
..__........W.
y..
EMT ._.T ... ..- .........�. -, ._a r._....
106 39,60
_
- - �.......�..._. 2 !#9 » .. 0
1
02/27/9
302930
GL« I NS K I ., (37ElRAi. «D
R{ »! «'U FAMILY ShICJW
6
b „ C
1. 689.:1
02 /2.. 7/9 5
, O'294D
GLOBE AME<F`� I CAM T'CICJLw S[JI~'F•'L..'�'
I~'C�WE� �'#�IF'�EAI�I MG I�AC L•i I h1E !fir. M:E SC
� ,� 1 � � 4D
.:s .� 125, w 40
1. �}G9�a
D2f 7/9
320250
t RAI•"!• ,, DAVE
1::'MT FOR KARATS CLASSES
378.00
_
; 78 .. fit)
1689
02
3 20 26 5
GRAF I X wiHClPPE"
REPA & MA I NT /tlL':•H I CL.•
2 60 ..9 3
REPAIF' & MAINT /MITI I:CL
2
I �' �: 'T'F+; :L F�' :C hIC; t E' SQUAD
71,36
593
a.. /a•• � / S
,.}� Qa..tJt�
t7 1•�A I l�It�E R
SUF•'i•'I... I h fa "" 1:..t:�1.11.1 "'Kr-:I�IT'
G!�} . 52
MI �at:.L «L..L «ANE•CIUS COMMODITIES
35
12 1 . 88
t6899
0,2- /27/9 5
3 4e 0 2:.90
atR6 S I<E C*Ar -kat"
I"`UND FAM SNOWSHOE
G w oil
8, 00
1 690 0
02:•
Z20400
t R I ItlNEL:.L . FIR P SY.a o
REF A IRS & MT NCE N /E QU I. FOMENT
1.86 w fad?
1 Sep N 60 .
1.6901
02/27/95
3 3 0 223
HAMILTON.., MICHAEL
Ri::aF UND -- F SNOWSI.40E
6 .00
6 " 00
•1.69
33040
HAYMAN ;, ZJANE•T GREW
F�'F'�C�t:�F�At"! SUF•`F�'L..I ES
21 . 59
L "C: i 1 3 FOR !� "t11"� � }!•.:.t•�' 1r t.,l•I
.!. » 60
9,86
l...1•fl - 1. , , E AI._I...0WANC:E::
41 . 86
74.91.
:1.6903
02/27/95
330500
!••IAWE o WE NDY
REFUND .... SW I N & GYM
22..50
22.50
1.6925 02/27/95
510500 MAF"L.EWOOD BAKERY
MDSE. FOR RESALEE
391 . 08
391 . 08
VOUCHRE2
CITY
Or- MAPL.W
E
'OOD
PA3E 1,0
02/16 / 95
-IER/ -IF'- C K RF-
VOUM _!�t -GISTER
FOR
1 ::11:,'.R :I: (:)D :1.5
V0U(*I-4F`-:R/
c v I fi
CHECK
VEND OR
VENDOk
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
�DESCRI•T ON
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
&04
02/27/95
350895
HO I K KA HOUSE
REFUND ELL-ESMERE ISI.-AND PROG
20.00
20.00
1.6905
02/27/95
370076
HUGHES & COSTEL.L.0
PROSECUTION COSTS
348.90
3481090
16906
02/27/95
370100
HUTCH INSON,
.j ,ANN
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
74 ot.-%4
c-
VEHIC,*'I.E ALL-OWAN f-, ... ... ...... - - ---- -
91 63
16907
02/27/95.
390100
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL. DIST. 0622
COMM CTR EVENTS FLYE*,-'R
184.14
1-84.14
t6908
02/27/9
390300
INDUSTRIAL 9-tj`PPLy
SUPPL IES EQUIPMENt
63 Y 0
63.10
.. .... 16909
02/27/9'.5
3) 9: 1.3 0
.
wit F . O
1 N mk!q� ASSOC.N.., Q S F P OL I C EI:
ANNUAL. POL I CY .CENTER SQR
30 n-
30.00
16910
02/27/95
391690
INTI._,SOCIETY OF CRIME PREV.
1995 DUES
35,00
35.00
16911
0 *2. 2 / 7/ 9..
1460300
TS
J & lw.'INSTRUMtN , I INC «
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
1 09. N 36
109.,36
16912
02./27/9%,
400650
J, RR 'S APPL lA-NcE .,D I SPOSAL, INC
A/*C.Rt-7.CY*CLED & A P PL I A N C I--- S
i77,i6O:
1 6913
02/27/95
401550
JOHN WILEY & SONSq INC.
BOOKS
82.39
82,39
16914
02/27/95
40i62-0
JOHNS CON p XEVIW, AR**T'HUR*
' '.TRAvEL, RA II NO,
-.5 1.21
at.o 2 :
I t?.) 9 15
02/27/95,
4iO64o .
K E Y Sf Q RE CORF*,".,,
LE_ ...SYS
Agv I NO
SUPPLI'
ES
'16 4.5
1"'S
136,45
116916
02/27/95
420150
KINKO'S NATIONAL A/R
PROGRAM SUPPI_IEta
92,79
PRESCHOOL FLYERS
22.37
115.16
16917
02/27/95
430300
I<NbWLAN`08
SUPPLIES JANITORIAL
36A0
PROGRAM SUPPL. I ES
33
1691.8
02/27/95
430350
KNOX LUMBER CO 0212
SMALL TOO•.S
412.13
412.13
1.6919
02/27/95
4 590 5'1 0
LAW IE'P WORL.DWIM 4 ... INCii
-�REPA iR MAINT/EQUIPME
971*00
97"00�
169
02/27/95
470700
Lftllt SUBURBAN NE WS PAPERS
Ali FOR POLICE.OFFICER
1 5 7 1* 50
7 Y 115
16921
02/27/95
500025
M-R SIGN COMPANY
M__R SIGN CO
64.79
64.79
1692.,22%
022% • 7 90%
1,5000427
MwGwPfl'OwAfi*
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEM't-IERSEHI.Ps
45,00
SUBSCR I PT I ONS & MEEMBERSHIPS
15.00
60*00
_T �-;_j
0 / 5
01505
MAGU CHI , C
3RETCHEN B.
& TRAINING
VEHICL-E ALLOWANCE
10.92
Dl:_:T:"Ol.3)ITS PAYABI ... 1:--**
575.00
PROG"RAIll SUPPL.IES
604.50
16924
02/27/95
51.0103)
MON IR31--_ SYSTI:_r,M 1=(:)I:Z BUS INFEES'S IN(:
SUP` 1.11-�S, OFI- ICE
1 58 36
-8.36
1.6925 02/27/95
510500 MAF"L.EWOOD BAKERY
MDSE. FOR RESALEE
391 . 08
391 . 08
OUCI••1I t: C
CITY O
OF MAPL EWOOD ,
,
.._.
02/16
09-ate t
t .. , ., t ., G
i • i:)1•t P
P1...R :I: is }X) 1.115 .
. «- ..... ,.,_w._..u..w . ...........r.«.._._.... «.....� _..µ._ .
......_...,..._ ._ . W ...._ r....._.
C:I+•IE::i K
CHE V
VENDOR V
VENDOR
ITE M
'M -
NUMBER A
AT`k' N
NUMBER N
NAME .
. - T
T '
CHEC:K
AMOUNT A
AMOUNT
•t:. •
•t» .t» 1 !' 7 w 5
511300 M
MARTIN t .
E'Cll T UF- C�E'F I C.`t:..R TESTING 9
918.00 9
......_...,:......: . .......:.....,...
_
1 0
0 2/27/95 5
511 M
M I C.: K PEAT
P ROGRE SS B I i. «i.» I i AU i
i � n0 M nn '
'� �'
L t� �
0, 5
� y
y� �h �+ ��� �! y
REPAIR & MTNC E N /C.Q�J.1.1" NT �
y pry
1 • " n
n•../•..7/9 ti t
ti 1.1 to .�n
MATERIAL-':) DISTRIBUTION C• lJND S
SUPPLIES 2
25.08
25 N 08
16930 0
0 2/ 27/ 95 '
't 4 9 M
M CONSTRUCTION C:CI N ;,
INC. C
COMM C:T W O R K J AN 95 �
�:'7 � N 8� �
�, � .;,
t 69 31 0
02/ 5
520500 m
mc-s .1 RF.- M I t'. 4 "'1 1... 1
1" 1.:.� 9 5 EH .1. CrLl :. 1"1L
1. OWANCE 4
4 '5n .0 nn :
:-1n .. nn
1. 19.32 /
/ 7/9 5
530 730 M
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY P
PROGRAM Etl.1! PI.. I Eli 6
689.59 6
689.59
16933 0
0 2/27/ 95 5
5307 M
M ETRO CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS O
OUTSID R ENTA L -••• EQUIPM
273.92
OUTSIDE, RENTAL EQUIPMENT
273 N 92
547.84
t 69:54 5
5 1
1 9 3 1300 M
METRO IN SP T ION SERVICE �
�E
E1CTIC II~fl"'CN
6.29 80
DE F*E - -. '+ RE:D REV E LE•C: PERMIT 7
7 v 863 , 50
E
ELECTRIC PERMIT FEES 7
7 M 86S N 50- 6
6 . ,
1 4 - § 0
02/27/9 5
5314nn E
E:
M tRa A i »�:fS A NC: w -
C OPIER RVI C:E AGREEMENT -1 'YR
.t«ya.}"fnwn
-
16 9.:6 02 /.27/9" 5
5 3 1 (3nn M
" t ,
C.1I11:1�`CI�M� � CLOT HING
.�,
1 693I' 0
0 w
wi 3 1900 M
M I C!••IAL ' S CATE P
PROGRAM Erl• F'E'I••• I ES 4
48 , 2 4
. _.
BA 7
77 -
- 2
16-938 n
n / 5
540876 M
MIS DF T -•T Or PUBLIC AFETY R
REPAIRS & MTNC w /EQU �: l�I�l ENT :
:i. �0 « �q
_ _
.:.!"tA L I4 MThtC:E. « /L Clt.1 I I: ML::hd 2
2 ,130.00
_
1 6939 0
02/27/9 5
5 41900 M
MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT B
BI. Ul.: I N S FOR BIDDING !~'ROJ9302 5
588,31 �
� t�t •r
'16940 0
02 /27/95 "
"` ���nn f
f�hl �?�:�'•`T ' Off" CORRECT A
At,lC T'1C ?fit w }ERtI:�C:E:.
A�•• N ntiI'.. 3
32, to
0
02/ . 2 . 7/9 5 w
w'"' 5060n M
M DEPUT REGISTR
TR A SSCJt ✓ » , �
�
1 J � w MEMBERSHIPS
:5150 M 00
35
:
:16942 0
02/27/95 5
551500 M
MN POLLUTION C:Clhi'�'ROL- E
EMISSION TESTS 2
240
:1.6947 02/27/95 640550 hlELl "Siahl JEAN VEHICLE ALLOWANCE
f:~' 6 N 2 7 36.27
VOUCHRE2
CITY
Off' MAPLE= WOOD
PAGE 12
02/16/95
09:45
VOUCHER/CHECK REGIS* ER
1::* OR
PI.--.:R'.I*C)I) .1.5
,VOUCHER/.
CHECK
CHECK*
VENDOR
VENDOR
ITEM
ITEM
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
16
02/27/95
.. .... ....
661108
NORTH STAR WIPER & INDUSTRIAL
SUPPLIES — JANITORIAL
337,31
337o3l
16949
02/27/95
661181
NORTHERN ATROAS
SUPPLIES — EQUTPMENT
79.39
79.39
16950
02/27/95
661600
pINC.
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS.
SUPPLIES — VEHICLE
61*62.
SMALL TOOLS
113*,45
SMALL TOOLS
231.36
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
23,39
.429.82
16951
02/27/95
1820a 63
1320,63
662250
NORTHWESTERN SERVICE INC
REPAIR & MAINti & GROUNDS
16952
02/27/95
662290
NORTHWEST FABRICS
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
16953
02/27/95
680600
OCTOPUS CAR WASH
CAR WASHES
180,00
CAR WA
22.*50
CAR WASHES
7w'50
CAR WASHES
.7,w5O
217,50
16954
02/27/95
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
681150
OFF ICEMAX INC.
137,m30
137.30
16955
02/27/95
691.800
OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
14,70
14.70
16956
02/27/95
6921300
OXYGEN SERVICE
MAINTENANCE MATERIAL
59m31
16957
02/27/95
700675
PAKOY
INSPECTION JAN 12 FEB 03
11
..........
111122.23
16958
02/27/95
700800
PAPER WAREHOUSE
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
79o88
103. 1
--.P.,.ROGkAM..."SU,P.P,L.I.ES,
16959
02/27/95
711.500
PHOTOS TO 00
SUPPLIES — EQUIPMENT
44.41
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
38.22
F I D — V E L 0" Of - ' NG
5.2 8,
FILM DEVELOPING
4.38
FILM DEVE LOP INC.7%
21.90
PH0.'TO I)E:VEL..(:)F*-4:1 NO
4 » 96
FILM DEVELOPING
8: 55
FILM DEVELOPING
4,74
132.,44
16960
02/27/95
712100
PrTNEY BOWES INC.
P 0 1%3 T A G-) E
19,000
P0.13)TAGE
19,000
38.00
16961
02/27/95
712111
PLAZA TIRE AND SERVICE INC
REPAIR & MAINT/VEHICLEW
12.90
12.90
16962
02/27/95
712115
REPAIR & j4Af
179o*39
179,39
POLAR CHEVROLET GEO
16963
02/27/95
721285
PROFESSIONAL REDEVELOPMENT
REVIEW OPEN SPACE SITE 116
275,00
REV IEW OPEN SPACE SITE 108
275.00
550.00
*1 A9A4 02z'.*7/4p%
721301 PROORESSIVE CONSULT TMO ENS TNC WATFR rl.YgTr-.M ANALYSTS
tP., PR4 - 00 PS4., on
i,
Y OUCt {RE�t2.
C: I T`Y OF �tAF'La W�►C�D
PAG ' l a
E
0 2/1 6 /9, 1 5
09. 45
V REGISTER _.. ._.. -., ..
FOR F:"ERIOD 15
VOUCHE.R
•
c:wt�..cwt
�.w
+t~ h�a
+� H yr:
: Teri.
cl
NUMBER •�t ~'i•�
1
NUMBER •�
NAME
DESCRIPTION*
AMOUNT, NT
�tt�UN`�`'
1
02/27/95
740800
RADIO SHACK
SUF* -*F''L. I Eli -••• EQUIPMENT
111 « 77
111,77
1 Ea9�ic�
0 2 /2 7/9 5
741200
RAIN BOW FOO
MDS FO RE
20.
VIDtsEN » FOR RESALE
4.50
'
IrID� -OR RESALE
�~� 4
1Ytlfy ;:� " .. FOR C t:- :SAL.E.:
.. .:. .::.... ... ....:
�. � �. �
.:.. N
Y try RES
trtDC• E « w 1. R
12.00
Ir{D a FOR RE "ciAL•E•
7.50
M DSE. FOR RE AI...1.-
3 3.04 —
45.
16967
0.�.. /.�.. �'
741. 00..
t`"� �"{ Y` CLINIC : C
'#�•tY i A .. �"q : hIE :W OFFICERS..
S��O w 00
940 ,. Ofd
�. G
02/27/9
74 �. 310
I• AMSE:Y (L I tit I C: AS TRAVEL & TRAINING
1.7
175.00
1 6969
02/27/9
74 1332
RAMS ~Y CCl »
1995 DUES
20 000
- 2 0.00
1 69 70
0 5
742120
t"•ZAMSE.Y CC�UNT`Y
%S(i " t L I ES— 1 Gt.l 1. �'t {:' !� `�
.:f 1.. 56
�� 1, ww�?
a: a97:1
0,2/.27/9 �i
74,2400
F�AhIDLNE:., iH CxhthtE:
E'F'l.1hiD �•• WINTER CRAFTS
1 C#`« 00
� 18.00
16972
02/27/9
7
R ITZ . C.AM RA
FI LM X}EVE1.NOP I N
t2,54
S UPP LIES t... � .b 1 h�.
�. M
d. 3 M 6 1
16973
02
7 c�1.i� 00
RCJA� IC J {�Ihl�'
��I�:!< t.� "' P RO 1'•�t�irtSi C O ' C [�t !
Iii` - G '.
10 .. 110
_ w....._
16974
02/27/95
?80300
S&.T OFFICE PRODUCTS
INC, Sl.lF'E'L I S — OFFICE
31,4
SUPPLIES NN OFFICE
62
:...■■1■
FF
'■�N^
N. M
.
■•■ . ^ • ■ ■� .
y ■ ■ � ■ ■may_
�t ' t•N •M t•M •••• �t • M/ 1M N
�• + (aN'J
�iiiNi UL
a t.JF`i':'I.I E:: .:.. GE;. I CfE
41 « M
at.JF'I `L:. I E**S •.•• OFFICE
42,.96
a...I:..ANE::OUS COMMODITIES
70
OFFICE
2.35
I
f: l.Jw`1••`t....0 EN .... OFFICE
fa 31
•t l N• 1 K G�
**:Jl° F I.., I F N I CE
�
2
OFFICE
146.i17
113 1E JF F I I E OF'F I C'E
:36 87
Sl:JF**F= 'i.N :l: E S •-•• OFFICE
73.
':) t.J l "' w 'IN• I E•S O F'F'I C E
80.44
$3 tir.l :.•L :.:a •...O
M 5 :5
I.JF'h`Ii.. I i :» OFFICE
N 64-
_
_ .. «
at .f ES—OFFICE
122.. 58
C%t.JI::'FL.• ` I E :c*,N••OF E- I CE
13
Sta �'t�'IN. I t ••CI ICE
031 « t5 ;: i
1 M O6 0 .33
16975
02 /27/95
7
SAM. 'I.L _Ur_4L D IRECT
MDSE. w FOR RESALE
446
PROGRAM SUPPLIES
.aG
S tac•�'r••t :.. I I :�:3 ..N cats I �' I C:r:
62
F'R06RAITI ::il.JF'F'LN I E:S
1. 30
752.16
r
1.6992 02/27/95 (361607 THANE kENEE r
REFUND - FAMILY SNOWSHOEING
21
4.00
V 0 U C H RL-22
CITY
OF" ,-IMA PL -EWOOD.:'
PAGE 14
02/16/95
09 4 5
VOUCFlER/CFlr.0 1( REGISTER .WW ....... .... ..
FOR
1::"ERIOD 1.5
V(ItJCHI----.R/
CHECK
VENDOR
VENDOR
I T
-T 'lH
CHECK
NUMBER
DATE
NUMBER
NAME
DESCR I P r I ON
A MOUNT
AMOUN*r
166 1 a
02/27/95
790020
SCHEFFLERp PATTY
REFUND BIRTHDAY PARTY
3.75
3.7 - 5
1.6977
02/27/95
820225
SIMPLEX • TIME REECORDER CO
SERVICE AGREEMENT
94.00
94. 00
1
16978
02-/27/95
820600
SNAP -OW TOOL S'
SUPPLIES EQU I PME NT:
203 6b
-------
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
69.37
SMALL- TOOLS
152.16
425.21
16979
02727/95'
830800
SOUTHAM BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
PUBLISH AD FOR BID 93-02
200,00
200.00
16980
02/2.7/95
831400.
C.-WARTAN PROMOT I ONAL OROUP INC io.
MDStlii FOR RESALE
4801982.
MDSE,, FOR RESALE.-
277.,67.
16981
02/27/95
840275
JOHN'S HOSPITAL
C.'-DF*-'Y OF RECORDS
4.50
4.50
Y.
16982
02/27/05
.840300
ST. r- STAT I ON
SUPPLtEs Or-7rIcE
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT..:..
00
UPF IE
S - *LS OFFICE':
50
t.JlAIl::T)RM'%:> & (4-LOTHING
5.70
SUPPLIES OFFICE
75.70
SUPPLIES OFFICE
62,33
278.78
1. 6983
022122719' 5
840800
ST, PAUL RAMSEY' ME"D I CAL CEN Er
T' R
SUPPLIFE,
7 9 r- (..I U r P M EN
'T
14 163W04,
1-1163,06
4
:1.6984
02/27/95
640801
ST, PAIJL.---RAM.C-)E---Y MEDICAL CTR.
HE: P B TEST
96.00
169(35
02/27/95
841100
ST.PAUL STAMP WORKS
SUPPLIES OFFICE
197,31
197.31
14'
4
1.69(36
02/27/'95
843537
ST R' A T U! 9
IRS.&,
R E PA MTMCE. /ED. u I PMENT
2,
2 ,000 » 00
1 4
1. 096
C2.;;; Z; 9 5
8
SUNRAY AUTO F A R T S
SUPPLIES VEI-41 CLE
91.49
SUPPLIES VEHICL'
13.47
f:)UPPl ... IES VEHICLE
22.47
5•
UPPI It"' VEHICLE
'%:)(JPPL- I ES. VEH I Cl. E-
41:..
184.33
1. c4988
0 2727 79 ,-5
SUF"ERAMERICA
SUPPLIES EQUIPMEENT
... .. ....
152.30
61
6
FUEL & OIL
12.73
6:
FUEL & 0 I-L
21.73
6
61
16989
02/27/9' 5
860320
T"R*Fw SUP. •tY' Was.
MISCELLANEOUS COMMODITIE
119w .9
1. �9..
61
,��#
... ...
-, 8 - 60 , 6 - .5 - 0
TARGEKT STORI:-:'S--CF'C., A/R
P R 0'1ffv k A - 1 i - S UP - F'l I I H
6.37
6f
6�
SUPPLIES - OFFICE
32.87
A
%
-E)UPPL - EQUIPME*_NT
99"98
T
1
71�
BATTERIES
50. 86
T
16991
02/27/95
861500
TERRYBERRY
PROGRAII SUPPLAE.S:
0497 03
497,03
74
7E
fig
7E
r
1.6992 02/27/95 (361607 THANE kENEE r
REFUND - FAMILY SNOWSHOEING
21
4.00
-. :.,. _.,... l.11 ,. - ^_•- I•_:: - . : .`.I - ""_._1 _. - _'L._._ '.:2� ___ -__-
atl
-. .•. �n'°......,,......- r . t ..e- A ..- ..«.t p.:F:'I:ry
-___"_-__^_' n��." " RG.... 1N1m !°_ """.'^*5�3._' rn•
✓ r.....-, ° i•^...- ��. r n • ue?*. • . m ^t +'f .1MTM, ,f,.fnn.n .
VOUCHRE
C I TY
OF MAC`'I. EWOOD
PAGE 1
02/16/95
/,
VO C KCK REGISTER
FOR
:1.5
VOUC HEl-Z/
■r
IECI K
� �
��,�
�yy
wl� C�� \
(pw ■J��(. ,
VENDOR
N. TEI�
}Mi.
� �M►�
CHECK ,.::.
NUMBER
LAT'
NUMBER
NAMES
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
0 /x'7 /9 b
86 680
T I hICE ;I. AD n LINDA _ -
REFUND FAMILY SNOWSHOE
B. 00
8.00
1 699
0
8 7180 0
TOWER ASPHALT
M AINTENA NCE MA
319
319
J.69
02:
__ .
88067 5
�... -
TROPHIES UNLIMITED
- _ _ ..y. _ �........ .�_.. ._.................-
PROGRAM SUF:'>•:`L I ES
...W..... . ....`.......y....� 4 ..V....
51,07
....__....u... ._.._�. ....._...._��._LL_......r .... .._ .y__.....y..........w.W_.._
51
_ ....�.y...._.�_ -.. _ W�....�...__
___- .._..._....Y..._� ..�W
1. c� 96
_ �... _..- LL.....w...._y.._.._...
02/27/9 5
.u.._.. -
$3807 w 0
TROY CHEMICAL I l- lOU:: i I Ea
SLJI::'E: *LIES - EQU I F'IMENT
101.
S JF:'E:'L.. I E «S - EQUIPMENT
76
S JI''l I Ew;� - JANITORI
3 5 N 87
2
16997
0 2 7X 95
880800
TRUCK UT'ILIT'IES MFG »
MAINTENANCE MATERIALS
19.49
19,49
1. a 9903
/27/9 5
88 1 5 00
TWIN CITY F I lw.Tlw� �ir�a�;� :E E :E
�t.il• �'h'Lw I L�. {� - E' I l - 'Mlw.NT
390
S UPP LI ES - EQUIPMENT
130.
52 1. 33
l x'999
02. '2`7/9 5
X382:. 00
TW I Y T
TOW
moo .
20"00
17000
02/2 7/9
890200
U S WEST CE LL U LAR , I NC
TELEPHONE
27,. 57
T
2 7 w 5
TE'wL..E..l"'F'lONEw
2 8 N .. 9
83 N 53
17001
02c.-!/2
900 7
3.J1 I T' E0 PARCEL' t.w EE 1 Cr--
I"'CaT`A�
:3 7 � 7 �
37,75
1 x'002"
02:. /2:,7/9
901
V N -ELI.. It DELI
MO E:. FO RESALE
84 ,00,
84
1 7003
02/27/ 5
911 3 50
V IKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
SUPPLIES - EQU I I "'ME NT
89.77
SUPPL - EQUIPMENT
94,79
184.
1.7004
02/27/95
91.2100
V IRTUE !~•R 1N I tttr�
S UPP LIE OFFICE ICE
44
: :itJPl::'L.. I I : : :S OFFI
4 4 1.
QUF:l: %. I E S w.. OFFICE
1 a N 52w..
6 1. 38
1. 7005
{}�,■ � / 1��
7t I�w �w ! T
� i J�( / �� ,
\l �.t l K
ar,' (�iY� (w� �M.{�,
�Y N �N. N I I. i M STATE 1 w CO .,
M��y, .! �{�.w EQU
W ` ./. �.w �w.
�/y �� [j��
I ! 1 B M 00
w r , � ♦y ♦ y
F / \
17c tyc
02 /27/95
931850
W r hl:� hlG ._ : 'f' l�" l*lI I
SI GN S & SIGNALS
2q� » 77
_ 202i.7
17007
02/27/95
931.851
WARNING Lw I TES
TRAVI'--* L & TRAINING
135
TRA & T
l ,55 N 00
2 70 .00
1.7008
0
941075
WI~wSTtU NE SUPPLY INC MAI" LEWOOD
SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT
32..ti.3 9 2w
��l.lE•'E: EQUIPMENT
1.90 91
1 14 « 83
17009
02 /27/9 5
9 50 1 00
WONDERMAT t :L.E:ANER
REPAIR & MA I NT /EQU I PME-14T
36.00
36.00
- 170.10
02/
95032
WORD PERFECT MAGAZINE
SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS.
_ 24.0o
24000
1.
0
970700
YO(..l.3M O IL CO ..
MAINTENANCE MATT."" -*R I AID
U /L.. GASOL I NE:.
5p 824.00
5
:1.701.2
02 /27/95
980700
LINDA NDA Z I C K
51.Jl : :"PLw I ES OFFICE
15.31
TOTAL CHIECKS
ti �_. �..� :._ -eY v+:.c }a'k.�•.c. _ .....
BOO KS . p �.l - -
74 ca
5 .
JU�
5if
,f
GU�
ti �_. �..� :._ -eY v+:.c }a'k.�•.c. _ .....
BOO KS . p �.l - -
74 ca
0045999 02 / 1 /9 5 DANIEL F FAUST
m
43f: -)Q46QQ0:
QZ f I Q Pei
L 1 NDA Z.. I CK
--WOOD
CITY OF MAPLE
414
P
tEMPLCDYELE
GROSS ji-Ei.ARNINGS-s Allk PAYROLL D E D U C T I Cl 1-1 C HE C K S
-oz/10195
ND:�Y. KLAG-ER:.
/1
46.
F 17JR THE
CURRENI" PAY P R I -
tIUD
47 0 0 4 0 0 2
2
CHECK NUMB E R
CH' A t';-D
P A Y E-,. E
AMOUNT
I
01
48 IL
00
Oz/ 10/95
1) A CARLS,ON
3 0 1 2-.1
A ANk M A Y HE S. .: -: . � .�'
6 Il
0 0 4 0 0 5
OZ/10/95
MARGARET GIBBS
02 0 5-
GE&IRIG-L".' Sit.
0 . 1 .6 el
8
9
0 0 4 5'9 3 3
02110 155
SH .3k*Y' ..ALL—NSFACH
E:Rk
0 1 ,
Pol
0 0 4 59 P-2- 4
0 4 1 95
GARY W BASIFIAN
343*12
121
3
0045985.
'10/95,
M -ARV I R KOFPEN-::
0 1 we
0045986
0-2 110 9 5
SHt.RYL.LE.:.
2. 0:
16
17
00 45987
02/10/96
MICHAEL A Mc
3 1 . 7
6 3 6
18
119f
3
004598,
0 2-110. 9 5
tS—'� CARLSON.*
T'H E R .— 9'
20t-
21:
0045989. -
-
0 2 10 54 .5
I CR
GRE'r-CHEN �MAGL L
Z •6 3 5
22
0045990
02/10/95
GINA • CASAREZ
1 0 *36 91
1241
1125
0045991.
OZ/10/9-5
DANIEL- KIN�N+EY
7 9.' 6 8 0
26
1 271
0045+992-
�02 f 1 0 1 9 5
N
DAVI D J J A,H
5� 9 1.
28'
4 '
29
0045993
02/10/95
DANIP-L MALLOCK
252600
30
131
C-) 0 4 15 9 9 4
012/10-/95
G R G 0 Ft. F'ItKAR 'SK
132
St r
33�1
0045995:
OZ*/ 10/95
LARRY: J C,UDE
341
35
0045996
02/10/95
AN ri R A J. 0S 7 t?-: R
3
37�
:004599+T
0 1 9 55'
WlLLIAM Mn IX i S-K X-
--10 4
140
38
1 391
0045-998
02/10/95
4EHAN.
J A M L.S' 8
I t 00
0045999 02 / 1 /9 5 DANIEL F FAUST
m
43f: -)Q46QQ0:
QZ f I Q Pei
L 1 NDA Z.. I CK
414
004 `001
-oz/10195
ND:�Y. KLAG-ER:.
1 1 4 6 9: 15.
46.
47 0 0 4 0 0 2
0.2- /2 10 9 5
DEBORAH DEHN,
795.90
481
01
48 IL
5 4 :0046004
0 2/10/95
A ANk M A Y HE S. .: -: . � .�'
.5,011. CIT.
0 0 4 0 0 5
OZ/10/95
MARGARET GIBBS
667,ZO
Oz
00-46006— -:5 VIGNAL 4ZI 1:
10/9. UELORES A a
k R+ 1�450
157j. 0046007� 02110195..'' C A, LE.'". J a 0 0:
�25r L) Q 4 (d 1 81, CIZ 1. 0/1 ?-5 I-A.,
F61
0041.5019 oz/ 10/95.
11 1 8z 4*71:
I
1, 1 1 0046-020 02/10/95 K E N N 717. H V C01 LINS
:291 2 *48
1 i
00460Z1
OZ/ 10/9
CiTY OF MAPLEWOOD
000Z
13 64w
EMPLOY,". E GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION C KS HEC
o.
FOR
T.Ht QU�RRE PAY PERIOD
' NT
02 0 9 5
d 0 A N- N: L".
M SVENDSEN
,34
2.
CHE-CK NUMBER,
CHECK D kj t U.,
A 01, 0: Ut 14 T
00460Z3
13
E-L A I NE
FULLER
6p 4 1 Il:
i,3)
6
' 31
;
0046008
02/10/95
JUDY DeBILZAN
473.49
2 3�
60
004 09
OZ/ 10/95
LU I LLE' ELI
--C :E:::� A UR
Z7 1�
Z.
140
.'4:':..
1
0046010-
02/ 10/95
:B -E TT Y. _ �.�U*:-: S ELV 0
5,1
.0 0
101
0046011
02 /10/ 95'
PAfRICIA FRY
*843-85
-4
021
i3 .
004.6012
02/10/95
L 0. I S:::
1* 1-33 4 15-
141.
00460-13
'95.,
ozilol
CONN E:.': L KEL S. EY ::....
T 6 331
1161
0 0 4 6 0 e'.1 9
0%7-/10/95
CAROL NELSON
17 16
1481
0046014
02/10/95
BONNIE JOH14SON
61:11D,
35
1 18 1
Z 1 b
S:C::U I T� L.
I E F:F E, 4:.
T, 9 .7
004601-5
0.2 i 1. 019 5
4`4
-
'2W
.. �� oz/10/9�5 .
JO H:k j-
�A NAIC K:*
4 ♦ 6 7 K
21'
0 0 4 1 1;�O 16
0 10 9 5:
C'ARGL:.'. J AGOE:
.521
5 c
1 22
153
1 23 i
02/10/95
0046017
02/10/95
JEANET E E CAR
I
T LE
l
�25r L) Q 4 (d 1 81, CIZ 1. 0/1 ?-5 I-A.,
F61
0041.5019 oz/ 10/95.
11 1 8z 4*71:
I
1, 1 1 0046-020 02/10/95 K E N N 717. H V C01 LINS
:291 2 *48
1 i
00460Z1
OZ/ 10/9
CARO.LE.:
ICHlE.
L� R J�
13 64w
33'
0 4 6.0 2 2
02 0 9 5
d 0 A N- N: L".
M SVENDSEN
,34
i 351
00460Z3
02/10/95
E-L A I NE
FULLER
6p 4 1 Il:
i,3)
6
' 31
;
00460Z 4
C. A. R Q-� : L- F`
M.- A R: T *'I'N-'S- N.
2 3�
00.460Z5
02110/95
1 Y:
A N. TR 0 .4
6 :
".-:CAHAN
Z.
140
(--)046026
ROBERT
D NELSON
2 2 33
A
i42!
G 4 155 U 2: -T
UZ 10 9 tv
E RIN 0 N-:,
T 5 T I" L
-4
0 0 4 0 •2 8
02-110 9 5.
DO NA- L D::..
W.. S:K'A L t4 A N
4 7 9
0 0 4 6 0 e'.1 9
0%7-/10/95
CAROL NELSON
17 16
1481
Z 1 b
S:C::U I T� L.
I E F:F E, 4:.
T, 9 .7
0046031 �
.. �� oz/10/9�5 .
JO H:k j-
�A NAIC K:*
4 ♦ 6 7 K
,
�
.521
153
0046032
02/10/95
JOHN C
BOHL
l
1 r:zi
V()4V--13
- b
0 277 1071 71y;.
R-71-T-Ti V--'.
'"A
PVUE-aU H:: h.
4- Zo'- 3
7!
6046034
0 Z 10/ 9.5.:
LAUR., S:7:"*" GEE-fR:G:E�
1 02 1
VV415vo I
I 9d. Q
274
0 0 4 &.ill: 0: 5 Z' oz./10195, 0 . H14,
:39[
: -Vl
i 4l l .
4)1
3 "
f url
i'd 6
147
0046053 02/10/95 DAVID J THOMALLA
1 i 9r.Z9,m 94
: , V I RG I NJ- A: DOWDLE.
4
0046056 02/10/95 STIE- V E:N PALMA
v 4 its Q0
v 4, 1 1, tj E i ta to" A U+L t V L- h U N..
491
K
00-46058 02 /1 0/9-51 M-ELYNDA:. RJOR
j 52 1 1
W S
0046059 02/10/95 S C 0 Tl A ANDRI--
fi
i 4!
99`? X. 51
1
v v 415 v cs V: 11, Lf 0
KU bt K :F: ft.. V UN Wt h." K ts Y
i 5t;l
1 854. ib
0046 061
CITY
OF MAPLOEEWOOD
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EEARNINGS
L
AND f,"`.AYR0Li DEDUCTION CHECKS
j
FOR 'FHE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
2 !' -R
CH,E,:CK NWMBL,.
C 14:E" C K� DATED
P A Y E, E
A N,
3
41
I
0046035
02/10/95
E S Y 0 U N G R'E. N
JAME
397 6 5
61
v 0 4 6 let..
I u bv
THOMA5---`. J.' Clif*LPAM X I I
. 0 0 6 0 37
0z f 10-19 5
CABO.T. V W: E-L C H L,- 1. N'
lit
0046038
02/10/95
RICHARD J L A 1;4 G,
1,745291-
4
0 4'16 0 4: 0
o/
02 1. '95
JCH'.AtL. RYAN,:..
2 09s:
16
17
0046041
02/10/95
MiCHAEL J HLRBtRT
i
19
QQ-46Q4Z
u Z/ I u I-lot
R I C H; A R Ul:: C DR'w E
U
241
0 04 61 0 4 3,
is
OZ/10/95
KEVIN: J 0 -HNSON:
1 1 4 3
221
0 0 4 6-ill, 0 4 4
0 2/1 0/95
ALIC L DUNN
5 7 -31- 1
;w i .231
I
l e4l
046045
o-z/ I G tf-
. • REG O RY L S : F Af N-E
3
Z it 0046046
0 2 10 9 F-5
RON k, LD: D: B E C K'
1 1342 0
i281
29 0046047
0211W95
V N R H AL W G
2 75
:301
Q 4 6 0 4 1-5
OZ
..
'3211 0046049
02 11 Q 96
..CK Q. --AN::�
A— B WM
1 :�783 :6 -1 -
334!
11 0046050
35
02JI10/95
FLINT D KARIS
1
VV415vo I
I 9d. Q
274
0 0 4 &.ill: 0: 5 Z' oz./10195, 0 . H14,
:39[
: -Vl
i 4l l .
4)1
3 "
f url
i'd 6
147
0046053 02/10/95 DAVID J THOMALLA
1 i 9r.Z9,m 94
: , V I RG I NJ- A: DOWDLE.
4
0046056 02/10/95 STIE- V E:N PALMA
v 4 its Q0
v 4, 1 1, tj E i ta to" A U+L t V L- h U N..
491
K
00-46058 02 /1 0/9-51 M-ELYNDA:. RJOR
j 52 1 1
W S
0046059 02/10/95 S C 0 Tl A ANDRI--
fi
i 4!
99`? X. 51
1
v v 415 v cs V: 11, Lf 0
KU bt K :F: ft.. V UN Wt h." K ts Y
i 5t;l
1 854. ib
0046 061
.,w' .,.�u.:re....n�r.
... w
....,.�. v,a...�:.a i_.. - „u..... ,..�
- ,-' . t « ♦ aFw L b Yr VF. .... v.- .HL ..t'.c , .ra' n �
.w .,el Tw a -,� A.A .. •Y .P.J4 Wt 1. +.++
�., ..} ..
, SY . . . : wn....., .4.+M1I� L'iR...
� .' �.: - �.. ..... ,. .. ,. . c' ...�
1
i
33
Y
0 0 4 : 6 0 7 �
i
f i E NEE ii= 0 D � �
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0004
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS AND
PAYROLL DEDUC'rION CHECi--.*.S
-
_
FOR THE
CU PA PER
1 1
etr�I
4.
2
w rte:
i t /i�.r NUMBE
iM { •.. 1N • r �.f
ms ..s .rr . ice.• E �
�j]j ( f i t a� f)
�j. ' 3 y � f(}r. ` � }
G.f - ..IF H E . if' X 11- i� ♦C' T i' . ..
� t ..' �
..
� .. ..
- :. .. �:. : ' �. .: ' .. .... -
/ � j{ '
• R. r • � M. 11� ..... '.: i
J1.
i3rt
..
:1
�4
1
133
1
}
i 6
f j
f , .. 6 0 1 -..J�
�.�* i' . .f a
01
L
i Z 5 s t {
.d' i t i.
-
-w
.. I
14 71
0
O Z 1 0 t e `:.s
D A V I i.F P L U i�
'
1
'21
113
0046066
U A N.
J, WILL'AN
11 4
k
00460 �
:. 0z _ 1019 Li.`1
}
li5
»
0 61
OZ/ 10[95
j AN ', #.
L ice► I R -
,. Z j”
1 F�
_
C16
t
046087
oz f 10 19
r�
-
5
r_
18
_. •
(o
Fi
-
12
t� D
5 6. Q: � �..
/0111-
23
0046071
0 %21 i 1 0 9 5
DAVID
L ARNOLD
2
i
2 5 E
G
1nt ) ' . 6 0 Z -
_ .. �i.` p r. l � ,T 7 'L. -
WALTE
i ..
- Yw. w • w� i
1 7
0
1 9 5
t
�28
E
. w = `r
JAYME E
•..d:. s Vi e:
33
Y
0 0 4 : 6 0 7 �
0 2 � 1 .� •• W
f i E NEE ii= 0 D � �
,5 ! 0 � Q �.�. .:
34
_
K HAID
2
i3rt
,
1
133
}
� 411
•�
1 1 _ 8 L w l
j 4 2
.. I
14 71
0
O Z 1 0 t e `:.s
D A V I i.F P L U i�
1 3 338 +s E
00460 �
:. 0z _ 1019 Li.`1
:.C'.E,: L U 'N .K.'.Tf ''
6 6.�5 .. 1 . � - .
1521
!
1 F�
t
046087
oz f 10 19
HELEY....
-
5
r-
r
_. •
c
C I TY O F M A P L E. W O s_{ D
0005
EMPLC -1YEE G I:.+SS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
! ,
F OR T
C PAY PERIOD
e,�
r
3
,.
1
5
�. #' 46089
��,:.. � 1 �.�
RONALD L EEE
1 , j4 5 0 , 81 7
{
: E
i.:
n t
jj
�� t ' _� �' �� _-'�
� .wf . - .• . 1 .
( �y
I • J 0
- .i' 4iwc.. d : ....
� �
i./ . L • . Mfr . L :. �� ., '...
' t t _
#. 'r.i� 7 f w •
a
1 1
f
004
'
112
11
HYS:
3
j
15 ' _
0 :2/1 0 /9 5
I ry
16
17
0046095
02/10/95
DENNI
1.8
tr 4 6 09
WILL.I .At4i: x.
/
i
.
22
Fa
123
0046098
.-; i
0�. � 10 r ?��
L � � I S J �_RtNNt R
1 , 38.E 55
E
j
!2ni: ..
t f( t t
.0 t'r =0' sl� _
_ j
�"�.6"'_� _ ♦ � J • _ � �
_ �if
...�. =ri:� �� -���� f�. e:_ �. L..�
�. _ f.���a M �;��
26 1
f
r;
0
,
.► .'.1 y t�.
C
!28
OZ/10/95
CRAIG MISKELL
581,63
1301
, r
131:
F
{ } �jy ��
-
� tt �fpyjt�
. r. t
S S»
_
C
..,. f
33 _
0 . -
r ... . -
_ .. �ii.w 1, 1 0 •.. _ J 5
' DE i-'i� .. 4 , ■�F'.:' p L �'��, �� �.-� :1. F . �
� �. •.� •�. � i T � -l"
34
� f
{Jr
;38t
A . SKA
:
1
004610
02/iO/95
JAMES S CH 1 NO EL
142{
43
Q Q 4 65 1 0.) 89% -
S. C.L H U:M'A.N- It.
4 Z47: 0 U:::-
44 C
...# ..
.
461
6110
-NKAMP
1
R 4�
t'
-
-
EE ,
g
i '
5 z
00461
Z
A :Y M N'.D:
Z 0 t a 4 r
15 21
l '
004
0 2/ 10/ 95
JANET G H YMAN
0�
� 5
54 1
v
55
(. 4 6 11 4
,
.-
77
- 1 lb z
i
0046115
MAR-rdARET'. K -UN-DE
171
E.,
r _... r , .,. ..,,. ...,_.:, ... . , .. ...
}
j
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0006
E M PL 0 Y rttt.E GROSS OSS Mr A R N I. N G Tats AND PAYROLL DE1YP U V F I O i.a' HE CK S
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
t
0 0-4 C's 116
02/10/915
JEAN NELSON
775x3o
6
7 �.
,
: ` #, K :S NELL
7 L
9
02 1 OJ 9 tm-
-_
E 7C 1,
-H - NSON
A HUT -4.
_ _
�1. �` 7 1:
�
I
0046119
02/10/95
RI-TA MACY
66,00
I2
f
.. :
.. ...
00461-21 . - ...
- 95 , � �
.'
� • �'. � -. � haw ` :.' :: - .w .::.•:
irc' . .i Tom: �. O W. S; O :' -" � � .:. .. ., .�. :'.,: �. -.
..
.. tir..... �' -� �
X 16
.. i !
004612
02/10/95
fir• f M I S! -•.ELL
t 2 3 12 i 40
, $)
�.
a." y
2Q}
:
L
1 231
0046125
02/10/95
_
24
. 25t
•
O.. S - K y.F
55 ��
.26
"
21
'7
.
_ 0 .
"
4r '�a! f '.w':
: i ? 1 � E .0 W T R �i..l y� - . =•� - .. � `�. � . -. ..� �.. _ � � �. � . .:" . '....
� ' •f ' � .. ��'.��� • �F� ' r' 't 1
4
29
0046128
02/10/95
NICHOLAS N CARVER
1301
J
i i
E
4
,
Z. 7 1 ( 79 57
_.
i Q 3....:.
•.1
'
4
0046130.
02/10:1
.. -..
;341
40 1 305
0046131
02/10/95
TANIA CHASE'
�' • M a at�
136
37
0- 4 1 :,,,
(J z 7 1. Q:
D 14 K Nv- UN
I
X38
"
�39
0 0 4 6 1 :.� ..f
W Yr►. l E ., _.:. ..
.. : J. `„ f =�. f «J fa
i40
i
0
02/10/95
JENNY SHAFFER
148 75
`421
MI CH.ELL HILSGEN
103'.35:
4 5k
; 4 6
'47
#_ # 0 4 61 ' 3 3 7
OZ/10/95
ANDREW PtRSBY
Z10600
,A8
}
0
i 4„
W .
(52
IMPP
I�
0046140
02/10/95
JEROME WEGWER117H
80000
55
7.
>>
-
.,
fi
10.0
zati
NEL
1 1231 0046152 02/10/95 JOSEPH CHL 47*25
l9w i
(J) 4 6 lb, .3. Z I 1 5, BRIAN. .5VEN'Da.E.N]
26
EN.
0046,154 oz /4 G 9 1.5 JENNY RYDE
!28
;9 •0041:011
30
Q04 15
!32.1
004615T
�
35 0046158
0 2- / 10 / 9 5 PAUL PIEHOWSKI
Z 1. Q/ 5� 5: MA TTHEM KL INKHAME
9 0:0
02/10/95 MAN 'S ANZALDI
60,00 -
50,18
37 Q Q 4 6 1 V 1 Q 0.
38.
.Qw
0
30. 0
STEWART
3E J
004 6 160 OZ/ 1 0/'.4.5 E N
41 0046161
02 �'lo 4195
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0007
EMPI
L
0YElE GROSS EAR
'NINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION C H E C. fe' S
42
F OR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
43r
0 ir.)- 4 6 1 65 Z
04 0/9 b
H. 1, L A KY: STEKARJ
Z 3: 0 0; 0:
CHECK NUMBER
c H EC K:-: UATEIY-:.
PAYEE
A K I D U* N: T.
.5
0046163
02/ 1 0/95
G' H R1 S U M Mm E
4
46
.
0046143
02/10/95
TIM BROWN
200,00
'47,50
6
.27
!481
-
CIC146144
LYNN P:E.TERS
O
00
UU
1 0:0 00A
0046145
oz 1 0-19 5:
j* 0 NIXT-H A N. P.R A T T
10i
004 ti 16'6
0 2 1 19 9.5
0046146
(12 10 1`9 5
LAURIE 7ABEL
78 100
02
0046147
0Z. 10 9 5
S P H EX*:. Z A F P: A---::
1470.5 ♦0
14
0046148
1 ol
S-HANN -R
-ON ST. E 1 NE I.N.G
161
17
0046149
oz/10195
ANN SCHULTZ
30 loo
1$�
Z 1
NAT H A 1.4 1 EL R E. N T ER 1A
3 t 50
211.
0046151
.02/10195"
D AK M-A-C K.
6 o' 0 0:
1 1231 0046152 02/10/95 JOSEPH CHL 47*25
l9w i
(J) 4 6 lb, .3. Z I 1 5, BRIAN. .5VEN'Da.E.N]
26
EN.
0046,154 oz /4 G 9 1.5 JENNY RYDE
!28
;9 •0041:011
30
Q04 15
!32.1
004615T
�
35 0046158
0 2- / 10 / 9 5 PAUL PIEHOWSKI
Z 1. Q/ 5� 5: MA TTHEM KL INKHAME
9 0:0
02/10/95 MAN 'S ANZALDI
60,00 -
50,18
37 Q Q 4 6 1 V 1 Q 0.
38.
.Qw
0
30. 0
STEWART
3E J
004 6 160 OZ/ 1 0/'.4.5 E N
0 0 4 6 1 I.Sil T ozilo195 ROY 6 WARD 476.00
3
UU46168 Q Z J 1 0.1 V
1551: b. 0 U Ub: L A. 5,:�!
.4 T AU Es �L 6'70
-
iooli
1157[ 0.0461-69 02 10 9 5 R I CH.-ARD NG.R0Q.U,lST
11
41 0046161
02 �'lo 4195
JANA SANDIN
175 5 0
42
43r
0 ir.)- 4 6 1 65 Z
04 0/9 b
H. 1, L A KY: STEKARJ
Z 3: 0 0; 0:
414
'STY:
.5
0046163
02/ 1 0/95
G' H R1 S U M Mm E
46
0 0 4 16 4
02/10195
HEIDI TUERK
'47,50
.27
!481
UU
1 0:0 00A
004 ti 16'6
0 2 1 19 9.5
1101i
0 0 4 6 1 I.Sil T ozilo195 ROY 6 WARD 476.00
3
UU46168 Q Z J 1 0.1 V
1551: b. 0 U Ub: L A. 5,:�!
.4 T AU Es �L 6'70
-
iooli
1157[ 0.0461-69 02 10 9 5 R I CH.-ARD NG.R0Q.U,lST
11
ff
40, 6i
_
27
1 ..
J CO.RCO
CITY OF T 1 A 1.f
0008
EMPLOYEE GROSS 'EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCrION CHECKS.
00 4618 2
0::: #1
TE .;k LARSON
FOR THtE
CURRENT' PAY P R 10D
i
4
.. t
r
k
/ :..
_K w' i'�:!
.:
_
1. :.. CHE Y' 7: i.� .. :. f•'
_
7rM- ..'- �::: :. :.;. ...; -� ..�.. �. "'. .'. . : :'.
-
Ot
.. +.. :
3 f
i
4i
-KE'LLY
1 31 1
i
.
1 IF 7 {,:. 4 s .. �..
t
rHOMAS E EASTMAN
1 -7 -%Z3 51
:161
i `
r
f
t
., 5
S
b s
f
0
..
l
1 `^,
,
E
...
•
t
J
,12f
1
3;
046174
D
52 79.
r
'4 4
004 619
.,...
PHIL 1,'P.. COLEMAN-::.
16
�,161
40
0046191
02/10/95
D-- EL
r
1181
♦
i 4
is
. 0 4 7 .3
Lw S • h
E. 4r
iJ [. } �t
...
, •.
i 4 w �Z3
;JVt
0046193
_.
_
4
1
r
00461T9
02/10/95
T KIRCHHAMER
12-3.00
ff
40, 6i
_
27
1 ..
J CO.RCO
1
00 4618 2
0::: #1
TE .;k LARSON
117,00
1
i
1 3 1 . 0
Z 10- 9, 5::
_
U H .. .
!D -_
!
X32,:
.10046184
33
-KE'LLY
1 31 1
.
135
rHOMAS E EASTMAN
1 -7 -%Z3 51
:161
i `
r
t
., 5
S
b s
t
,
E
1
•
J
,12f
1
t{
'4 4
004 619
02/10/95.
PHIL 1,'P.. COLEMAN-::.
11 0 4..'...
�,161
40
0046191
02/10/95
D-- EL
r
1181
♦
i 4
is
. 0 4 7 .3
Lw S • h
E. 4r
�r • w�
;JVt
0046193
oz 1. 0.1
31
15 2
r
4w
ALAW FREEMAN'.
Q
125
e. 0 L
0046208. OZ/10/95 CH7RI.SSY L Y Sl
I
Aw
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0009
301
EMPLOYEE GROSS EZARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION CHECKS
• I 9Z
3
IF OR 'THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD-
4 ** p I= R A s 5� I RU t. K
D E. 15 L
3 2
E
MBER DAT'
CHECK NU CHECK
PA. YE Ew
2
3 1
3 3
4
0046 7
02/10/95
JENNY MEINKE
175.50
DOUGLAS G E.Ril C K
7
1361
6
nJ Z 7 10: 7 515
XR7 u .
-.U7T
0046214
DEN
0 0.46s 19 8.
I Ul ly. ti
. . / '54' 5
OZ/10
CHAD ABRAHArMSON
331,50
142
0046199
oz 10. 95:
d ENN'IFEW. FRAZER,J`jam
Z'. 50,
10
11
J E SS i CK :
0046200
0 2 10 9 5
DEBORAH BAUERS
16.9 00
12
45
:46
KL h. K.
•,� M tt : .
114
1 5
SARA H ANDELRSON
00462.02
oz/ 10/9-5
I L S
-L WaH
2 4 1..*,.,:
00464"E03
08Z 1- 0 9.5
MELI SSA COONS
269,50
1
Oor46Z 19
UZ 7 1. 11) 7.9 5
WENDY.." DAV i
6 4 b
1
4
a
0 0 4 2 2 S.
4 _14
`.v 10
Rus c j
i 2 0
3 0 0 4 6 *?Z_�'Z 1
02/10/95
ANNA KLETT
1 2*3 • 0
21
.0046ZO5
OZ/10
DIANE:ESTEVEZ.
a
22
50
1 23
0046206
OZ/10/95
BR I AN OLSON
58 1 Z5
ALAW FREEMAN'.
Q
125
e. 0 L
0046208. OZ/10/95 CH7RI.SSY L Y Sl
I
Aw
301
3
6Z 10
oz 1 V
4 ** p I= R A s 5� I RU t. K
D E. 15 L
3 2
0046 2 11
GZ/ I G 9 5 .
J E NN I F ER:, H0L T Z.
z 8 00
3 3
341
-39.43
i t()046212
351
02/10/95
DOUGLAS G E.Ril C K
7
1361
37 0 0 4 62-: 13
[
nJ Z 7 10: 7 515
XR7 u .
-.U7T
0046214
DEN
192: 0 C
;40
1
0046215
. . / '54' 5
OZ/10
CHAD ABRAHArMSON
331,50
142
4 3 04 A-Z 16
0 2 7 1 a
J E SS i CK :
00462 1 T.
5
RY AN,: S.11 N C
w-ER
45
:46
0
0 0 4 Z* 18
02/10/95
SARA H ANDELRSON
199 50
.47
4011
Oor46Z 19
UZ 7 1. 11) 7.9 5
WENDY.." DAV i
6 4 b
1 49,
a
0 0 4 2 2 S.
OZ/ I 0 5
JHN.SON
JESS,ICA.: JC
0
512
.5
3 0 0 4 6 *?Z_�'Z 1
02/10/95
ANNA KLETT
1 2*3 • 0
OZ.1 1 07 95:
50
0 0 • 4 6 Z' Z 3
0 z 1: 1 9 5
M�E.L 1 SSA K R AY.�
U,R
4
1 5T
mmmow-Ml.
I
SYLVIA DOLINSKI
'38y
E HR.-
0046241. -CY: B
0 2 1, 0 915 N A N 4 7 13
1 41'
1 49
C ITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0010
-N
CATHLEI=- CASEY
EMPLOYEE
GROSS EARNJO.'NGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION C H tE- C K S
/6
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
2
.HEC NUMBER
CHECK D AT
pky8r..
qAMOUNT
3
521
*2wl-
14
1451
0 4 2 4 4
0 10 915:
DAR:L,A. 11 cm DONOUG:H.
00.468224
02/10/95
JEFFREY M 1
'ERSCH
841,00
I��
471
0046245
O)4'6ZZ5
OZ. 10 19 5-
JENNIFER:. F'l N-N�E
3 9 0
q
57:
004**ZZ6
02/i 0 5
BRADLEY'. K RUS C I'T
'HW
5-5 Ft , W.
11
00462*17--07
02/10/95
J E N N I F'I"--- R KUSZ
99,00
2 1
l3i
Q 0. 4 62 Z 8
O 10 /9 •
J ES s i CS- P--O WE R-s
2 5 oo;''
9
0 •... 4 6 2"-.
02 110./ 95
T A,,MM I l"' - nom
111: 00,
1171
0046230
02/10/95
J 0 RN ZENDER
90,000
0 0 4 6 Z' 3 1.
OZ/ 10/95
STEPHEW. RYMER
T ZZ
20
00462'
0 . 110/95.
2
HE A ER 8: E:H R
H-
4
2) 2
;23
0046233
02/10/95
JEFFREY SCHOEBERL
1 36 50
4
25:
00-46Z,34
OZ 10-/ ,,,mot
R I* TA, RENS-L _WK
AM,
217
0046Z35'
02. /* 10 9 5
A R I E�L- J 0 H N S 0 N-:
4
39
123
i29
0046236
OZ/10/95
COLLEE14 DIRKSWAGER
6 6 8 395
P o
046Z3-T
OZ. f 1 G/ 91
HELEN: S: A N C H�-E Z ,
81 1 z
SYLVIA DOLINSKI
'38y
E HR.-
0046241. -CY: B
0 2 1, 0 915 N A N 4 7 13
1 41'
1 49
0046242
OZ/10/95
-N
CATHLEI=- CASEY
73,13,
1421
43
0046Z43
02 1 OT?5 .
;E.F IELD�
�KATH EN. . MQF
tE 3
8
40
521
*2wl-
1451
0 4 2 4 4
0 10 915:
DAR:L,A. 11 cm DONOUG:H.
91 moo -,
1461
471
0046245
02/10/95
LORI LEHNEN
8
1 49
KJOY 2E 4 6
oz.
k. 0 L.E.
47a 3
004624T
OZ .10.
--DUtL
z
521
153
0046248
02/10/95
TENA SAG
91 moo -,
541
A I
is.
40
57:
0:0.46250-
02 1 0: 15.-_
oo.
CH
m-M 1
im; . 7"TPF M"'IFT "-5 -X: WIN T
23 0 0 4 CS' 2 6 0 02/10/95 S"J"'EVEN DEHMER 445;m 45
11
0046Z-61
c l z
7
00 4 62 6 2
28
5 :
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
0011
rl
EMPLILIYEE
GROSS EARNINGS AND PAYROLL DEDUCTION C C. K S
0 4.6,c:,; 4
..
132
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
33
0 z 10 4.741-5:
004 A Z--* 6. 5
C-i 0 4 6 2* 416, 8 VO ID
D
oz/ I o/ 9-:5
2
3 , 1 1 424
CHEM NUMBF...
4
AM`
41
00462-:'69 VOID
02/10/95
MN S Y A E. COMM OF REVENUE
w
4
m
�4
0 0- 4 Z5 1
02/10/95
PAUL SCHLINGMAN
.
I Z 99 5 1
6
- S
0046 tr Z
0AZ'-1 1019-5
RONA.LD. -:F --
45',
8
0 4 6 5 3.
oz/ 110/95'
m I C H A.E L:� J fj H:N,S Q N-:
m
10
i
1471
004C5254
0 Z 10 9 5
R I C K S' A R 0 S
77 00
12
1-4
11 3
0 0 6 • 5:
02 f 10 5
KELLY 'RABER:
14
�.
t.
4. 31.5
;
0 0 4 6 Z 15 6
10/95
JA,NL. T` C HR ENS:E N
1 : 48�
004-627+
O:r2
G:R EAJ: WE T. E-
5 0 0 -1.2
171
0046Z!57
(JZ/10/95
LYLE SWANSON
1 3 19
18
P 2
i 531
00462-75
02/10/95
CITY & COUNTY EMP* C R. U, NI 0 N
3 3 1 Z 0 C-1
0046Z5.8
OZ I :.1.5
BE T T Y AT HAM,
2 4, 0
0 -1
0
W
F
00 VOLD7
.4 lb 4 16.
1 21'1
1 F
U: .', L
N."k-'t Whl
C UR�
09.6 9
'0 �
XV
23 0 0 4 CS' 2 6 0 02/10/95 S"J"'EVEN DEHMER 445;m 45
11
1 1 367 . 51
1 0 4 11-1,11',
E.L. I Z A S 8i, T'H' J�. WKE I L A N�D 1 1 7 5.7 48
1 35 1
0046Z-61
c l z
7
00 4 62 6 2
28
5 :
129
36
i 35 7
0 4.6,c:,; 4
..
132
33
0 z 10 4.741-5:
004 A Z--* 6. 5
1 1 367 . 51
1 0 4 11-1,11',
E.L. I Z A S 8i, T'H' J�. WKE I L A N�D 1 1 7 5.7 48
1 35 1
JAME FENTON-
S:
c l z
02/10/95
1. 0/95
D-E NN I S' K. MUL V A NE Y
w. 4 - t'
9
5 :
1 1 367 . 51
1 0 4 11-1,11',
E.L. I Z A S 8i, T'H' J�. WKE I L A N�D 1 1 7 5.7 48
1 35 1
0046206 VOID
02/10/95
FIRST MINNVESUTA (FI.CA)
13 675 86
36
i 35 7
0046zl6ty VOID
0 z 10 4.741-5:
U B L I C' EM
C-i 0 4 6 2* 416, 8 VO ID
D
oz/ I o/ 9-:5
A:PLEW.000: ;-O-ANX: # I
ST A. E.: ra
3 , 1 1 424
4
41
00462-:'69 VOID
02/10/95
MN S Y A E. COMM OF REVENUE
12,673.881:
4
143
�, I
45',
04 6 2 T I VOID
Z7 1. 0
1 N N:E.S f�) TA
F 1. RS-,-.'T:* M .
5 0 0. CIO
;'46
i
1471
004 62-172 VOID
02/10/195
C I TY OF MAPLE WOOD (HCMA)
4
1-4
SYS
4. 31.5
;
004-627+
O:r2
G:R EAJ: WE T. E-
5 0 0 -1.2
P 2
i 531
00462-75
02/10/95
CITY & COUNTY EMP* C R. U, NI 0 N
3 3 1 Z 0 C-1
P" 4-
0 -1
W
F
00 VOLD7
.4 lb 4 16.
p p-
VZ t . 19-1-y'03."�
1 F
U: .', L
N."k-'t Whl
'0 �
0 0 4 6 r':-" 7 7
or Z
9 'i
S:
M-N: N -u: -'U A, L::: 1: F -E: IN- 3:*9 8 S.
p a+ " R. 3 9 . 0
0- -
6
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD 0012
EMPLOYEE GROSS EARNINGS
AND PAYROLL DEDucrION CHEr.,V,*.S
1 241
m P9
FOR THE
CURRENT PAY PERIOD
,26[
'271
CHE
2 C K NUMP4.ER:::��l
C. D
`-HE -ATED..
A
2 004 62 90 VOID
30
!31[
467 J. r Vo T
32r -
5 0-046.278VOID
02/10/95
COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCL
28Z. Soo
Z T V
7 .0046 ID
0
p E P;' R RZ)
M - TIREMENT1`
1. Tz
00 4 6 2 8 0
.02 10 '15, .
., FSCK 21 7 Z5
744
0046281 o*O
02/10/95 AF SC Mr E ZT25
L) 4 fir =;.,:
S U P ER. V I
-A S S:--
rot M L.rrT R' U �G R Y"7'
p U F � :
1 Er M'E- N T ASSOC
0 z i 10 • 9 5 LIC EMP�., q
0 0 4 6 Z VOID
R
1 8 6 9
004.284 VOID 02/10/95 PUBLIC E RETIREMENT ASSOC 511 736,34
z
02 1 0:/ 95
Z
0 0:
134
1 VOID 0046293
40 1'351
j r Z _ 7 " 1 4-JC
v u UL I C Ffq:rF K FiT I R.- E. M E KrTr' A S S U"C*'
P B L EI P',
02/10/95 PUBL I C EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 8
317
U I ONS
r) E D
G R 0 S S EARNINGS A N.D
44 1 0 4r.
39
1401
1 411
A
43
45
1 46
40 471
02/1*10/9"0- VACATION CHELCK
7,99
11 $ 7 55 - Z3
v 4 1 v
r
0 Z 1 1 W9 5 N G T N
CQj (j 0
0
W)41:,��U I Will 23
1 241
m P9
255i
,26[
'271
C,'(-')4 62 89 :
128
2 004 62 90 VOID
30
!31[
467 J. r Vo T
32r -
33 00 4 6 2 '.R 2. VO ID
134
1 VOID 0046293
40 1'351
j r Z _ 7 " 1 4-JC
v u UL I C Ffq:rF K FiT I R.- E. M E KrTr' A S S U"C*'
P B L EI P',
02/10/95 PUBL I C EMP RETIREMENT ASSOC 8
317
U I ONS
r) E D
G R 0 S S EARNINGS A N.D
44 1 0 4r.
39
1401
1 411
A
43
45
1 46
40 471
02/1*10/9"0- VACATION CHELCK
7,99
11 $ 7 55 - Z3
v 4 1 v
r
0 Z 1 1 W9 5 N G T N
CQj (j 0
0
ter.
AGENDA NO. 1.
AGENDA REPORT
TO"
FROM*
R .
RE*
DATE*
Cit Mana
Finance Director
Aotion b Counoil:j
Endorsed
Modified-W.........-- NOW
Re eaterl
Date
AUTHORIZATION FO TECHNICIAN
POSITION
Februar 2, 1995
PROPO
It is proposed that an additional accountin technician position be authorized to work
part-time as provided in the 1995 Bud
BACKGROUND
The 1995 Bud includes an appropriation to finance apart -time accountin technician
position in the Finance Department. The primar responsibilit of the position will be
to assist with pa processin Since the openin of the Communit Center there has
been a 5Q %increase in the pa processin worldoad. The number of pa checks
has increased to an avera of 276 bi-weeld from 186 bi-weekl To deal with the
increased worldoad, the pa accountin technician has been workin an avera of
50 hours per week since the be of November. (The overtime rate for this
position is $25,0.8 per hour. Also, some pro have been p on hold due to lack of
time. To alleviate the pa workload for the current emplo it is estimated that an
additional emplo will be needed to work approximatel 810 hours per y ear. This was
calculated as follows.-
520 hours - to eliminate the overti presentl bein worked b the current
emplo
150 hours - to process pa tasks while the current emplo is on
vacation
140 hours - to complete pro put on hold
810 hours -total
a 49 -
-t ne new position would have responsibilities in addition to pa tasks. These would
include bein the primar back up person for the accounts receivable clerl<,-, accounts
pa accountin technician and the data entr operator. Approximatel 300 hours
per y ear will be re for these responsibilities.
-UCOMMEI PATIO .
It is recommended that authorization be g iven to hire an additional accountin
technician position as provided in the 1995 Bud
PAAGMacaechmpt
Waumv
/L dw"3
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Commission's 1994 Annual Report
DATE: February 9, 1995
INTRODUCTION
Action by, CC3'C1naila
;indorse
M o d x f i o d.,,... �. �..... �.
Re j act eA
Date
The City Code requires that the Planning Commission prepare an annual report to the City
Council by their second meeting in February. This report should include the Commission's
activities in the past year and major projects for the new year.
1994 ACTIVITIES
The Commission considered the following:
11 changes to the land use plan
1 conditional use permit for a planned unit development
8 changes to the zoning map
9 preliminary plats
4 preliminary plat time extensions
5 ordinances
14 conditional use permits
2 home occupations
11 vacations of right -of - ways or easements
9 variances
.11 miscellaneous requests
The Commission also completed work on the commercial property study and sent it to the City
Council. The Council is planning on reviewing this study at a Council Manager workshop.
1994 LAND USE PLAN CHANCES
The Commission considered eleven changes to the land use plan in 1994.
Changes PC Action Council Action
Oak Ridge Estates South Approved Approved
(Lakewood and Maryland)
Phalen Townhomes Approved Approved
(Frost and English)
Bittersweet Estates
Approved
Approved
(Bittersweet and Demont)
Approved
Approved
Frost and English (open space)
Approved
Approved
Holiday Station (Lower Afton
Approved
Approved
and McKnight Road)
Tabled
No action yet
Mapleleaf Estates
Approved
Approved
(Cypress and Connor)
Maplewood Townhouses
Approved
Approved
(11th and Ariel)
Maplewood Retail Center
Approved
Approved
(White Bear Ave. +Hwy 36)
Tabled
No action yet
English and State Trail
Approved
Approved
(R -2 to OS)
Approved
Denied
Larpenteur and Century Avenue
Approved
Approved
(open space)
Approved
Approved
County Road D and Woodlynn
Approved
Approved
(open space)
Approved
Approved
1994 ZONING MAP CHANGES
The Commission considered eight changes to the zoning map in 1994.
Changes
PC Action
Council Action
Oakridge Estates South
Approved
Approved
(Lakewood and Maryland)
Phalen Townhomes
Approved
Approved
(Frost and English)
VOA Care Center
Approved
Approved
(Sherren and Cope)
Bittersweet Estates
Approved
Approved
(Bittersweet and Demont)
Holiday Station (Lower Afton
and McKnight Road)
Tabled
No action yet
Mapleleaf Estates
Approved
Approved
(Cypress and Connor)
Maplewood Townhouses
Approved
Approved
(11th and Ariel)
Maplewood Retail Center
Approved
Approved
(White Bear Ave +Hwy 36)
K
1994 ATTENDANCE
Na me
Appointed
Term Expires
1994 Attendance
William Rossbach
10 -10 -89
12 -96
20 out of 23
Gary Pearson
12 -10 -90
12 -96
20 out of 23
Todd Sandell
08 -08 -94
12 -96
8 out of 9*
Milo Thompson
10 -10 -94
12 -97
5 out of 5*
Jack Frost
12 -10 -90
12 -97
20 out of 23
Mary Martin
02 -25 -91
12 -97
12 out of 23
Kevin Kittridge
10 -12 -92
12 -97
19 out of 23
Dave Kopesky
08 -08 -94
12 -95
9 out of 9*
Lorraine Fischer
1970
12 -95
22 out of 23
Lester Axdahl
08 -08 -74
12 -95
22 out of 23
Marvin Sigmundik
03-14-83
12 -95
16 out of 23
*Completing the term of a previous member
MEMBERS WHO RESIGNED IN 1994
Roger Anitzberger
Sherry Allenspach
Gary Gerke
1995 ACTIVITIES
The following are the possible activities of the Planning Commission for 1995:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Commercial Property Study - follow closely and work with the City Council to move the
study along.
Have the Phalen Chain of Lakes study presented to the Planning Commission.
Have an annual tour of development sites after the City hires the new Director of
Community Development.
Do a review of the Comprehensive Plan for possible changes or updating.
Have a video tape made about the public hearing process.
C
6. Have in- service training for the Planning Commission.
7. Monitor the status of the proposed cluster housing ordinance in Marine- on -St. Croix for
possible use in Maplewood.
8. Have a joint meeting the Community Design Review Board (CDRB) about the commercial
property study.
pmuscelV94annrep.gwo (6.1 annual reports)
4
F - Y
Ac tio n by , Counoll.si
MEMORANDUM
Endorsed
Modif i ed... .,.
• Re j e�cte
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts Associate Planner r ` Dat e
SUBJECT: Ramsey County Low - Interest Loan Program
DAVE: February 15, 1995
INTRODUCTION
City staff is asking the City Council to change the handling of billings and payments of two low
i nterest loans from Ramsey County. This change would be for the loans for the Carefree Cottages
of Maplewood and the Golden Star Apartments. Maplewood, Ramsey County and the two
developers signed agreements about these loans. These agreements have the County passing the
loan money through the City to the developers. The County now will allow the City to be out of
this process. As such, the County would be dealing directly with the developers for billings and
payments.
BACKGROUND
The City approved low - interest loans from the County for these projects:
1. On March 22, 1993, the City Council approved a request from the developers of the
Carefree Cottages of Maplewood. The request was to apply to the County for a $648,000
low- interest loan. The developers used this money to buy the land for the project.
2. On December 13, 1993, the City Council approved a request from the owners of the Golden
Star Apartments at 315 -321 Larpenteur Avenue. This request was to apply to the County for
a $500,000 low- interest loan. The developers used this money to help rehabilitate the
apartments.
DISCUSSION
Ramsey County has changed their process for handling these loans. They now will contract
directly with the developer instead of passing the loan through the City. This will save the City
staff time and costs in processing the billings and payments.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution on page 3. This resolution authorizes staff to .change the agreements to
have:
L Ramsey County and the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment. Authority (FIRA)
(their loan processor) -send the bills directly to the developers.
2. The developers pay the Dakota County HRA directly.
kr /misc %tyloans.mem
Attachment: Loan Revision Resolution
2
ARESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGES TO EXISTING LOW - INTEREST LOAN
AGREEMENTS WITH RAMSEY COUNTY
V&JEREAS, the projects are known as the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood and the Golden
Star. Apartments.
WHEREAS, Maplewood approved low- interest loans for these projects in 1993 that require
the City to process billings and payments.
WHEREAS, Maplewood wishes to change. the billing and payment process for the low- interest
loans for these developments.
VJIEREAS, Ramsey County will now allow the developers to contract directly with Ramsey
County rather than having the City pass the loan through to them.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Maplewood City Council authorizes:
1. Ramsey County and the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
(their loan processor) to bill the developers directly.
2. The developers to pay the Dakota County HRA directly.
The Maplewood City Council passed this resolution on February 27, 1995.
CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIA TION
WHEREAS, Karla Sand became a member of the Human Relations Commission of
Maplewood, Minnesota, in February of 1987 and has served faithfully in that capacity; and
WHEREAS, she has given her time and energy without compensation for the betterment of
the City of Maplewood; and
WHEREAS, she has shown dedication to her duties and has contributed her leadership and
effort fog the benefit of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED for and on behalf of the City of
Maplewood, Minnesota, and the citizens of the City, that Karla Sand is hereby extended our
gratitude and appreciation for her service, and we wish her continued success in the future.
Gary Bastian, Mayor
Date
Michael McGuire, City Manager
till
m m
� o tj
Ci .
C4
m
c�
Fl- 6
CITY OF
AP LEVVOOD
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA 55109
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
612 -770 -4550
February 22, 1995
Aotion by Council:
;doe .,.,....._._........._
11odifiG
Mayor and City Counci I
Y Y
Re j eote
City of Little Canada
Date
515 Little Canada Road
Little Canada, Minnesota 55117
KELLER PARKWAY AROUND GERVAIS LAKE
Ramsey County has approached Little Canada and Maplewood with a proposal to
resurface Keller Parkway around Gervais Lake. As with all county resurfacing projects,
they have offered to add paved shoulders on each side of the roadway. The staffs of
Ramsey County and the two cities have conducted an informational meeting for
residents. It is our understanding that a number of alternatives were suggested by the
public at that meeting.
Recently, two residents appeared before the Maplewood City Council to discuss the
issue. It was evident from the presentation that there are legitimate concerns on the
part of the lake residents. The council also recognizes that there is a wider public
concern for traffic and pedestrian safety. This proposal is scheduled for the March 13
Maplewood City Council meeting. It is Maplewood's intention to notify the residents
around the lake and solicit their testimony at that meeting. A decision on the proposed
project will be made at that time.
We understand that the Little Canada City Council will take up this issue on March 8.
Based on limited discussions, we felt it appropriate to express an opinion on several
items. Maplewood supports the concept of resurfacing the county road based on its
deteriorated condition. Pedestrian safety is an important issue. It has been addressed
on other county roads by paving and striping the attached shoulder. In general, this
concept has worked very well. There is limited impact to adjoining property and the
cost to the public is rather minimal. It is our understanding that the proposal, as it
exists, would require the removal of a number of trees adjacent to the lake. Maplewood
Equal Opportunity Employer
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
February 22, 1995
has taken a strong stand on tree preservation. Maplewood would support alternatives
to tree removal, such as off centering the road within the right of way or possibly
providing a somewhat narrower section in critical areas for tree preservation.
Maplewood sees this project as an opportunity to provide a better roadway for the
public. We anticipate that the cities of Little Canada and Maplewood, along with
Ramsey County, can come to a reasonable consensus for the design of this project.
GARY BASTIAN - MAYOR
jc
Agenda No. F _
Ao tion by Counoll
Endo rs a d,-,�,.,,,,
AGENDA REPORT Modified
Rejected.,
DATE: February 21, 1995
TOO Mike McGuire
City Manager
FROM: She�r"ie Le
Humans Resource Director
SUBJECT: Staffing for Community Center
Over the past several months we have been trying to staff the Community Center
with as few "regular" employees as possible. (Regular employees are employees who
meet the definition of a public employee under the Minnesota PELRA Statutes; those
who work more than 14 hours per week and more than 67 days per year.)
The sole purpose of limiting the number of regular employees was to keep the staffing
costs as low as possible. We attempted to fill our staffing needs with positions that
were less than 14 hours per week (also called temporary/seasonal).
We have found that we cannot adequately staff some of the areas with this type of
position. The custodial and pool areas have never been fully staffed. There is high
turnover with positions that are 14 or fewer hours. In addition, we can't find enough
people willing to work so few hours so many positions remain vacant. Most
candidates want more hovers.
RECOMMENDATION
We hereby request approval to increase the number of regular employees in the job
classes of Lifeguard, Custodian, and Customer Service Representative. These job
classes are represented by A.F.S.C.M.E.. We will hire less temporary Lifeguards,
Building Attendants, and Customer Service Assistants. This should allow us to fill all
of our vacancies and should reduce the turnover.
AGENDA NO. "` 1
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: Assistant City Manager and Environmental Health Officer
RE: ORGANIZED COLLECTION
DATE: February 17, 1995
INTRODUCTION
• "
Aotion, bx Co' not
j
Endorse.,
odified,,.,�.,,_..�, �.,.
ReJecte
Date
At the February 6, 1995 Council /Manager Workshop, the City Council directed staff to
place the subject of organized collection on a regular Council meeting agenda.
BACKGROUND
The subject of organized collection has been discussed by the City Council for a
number of years. In 1987, the City Council formed a citizens' solid waste committee to
look at options for garbage collection. This research included recycling and regular
collection. Based on the Committee's final report, the City Council began the legal
process to consider organized collection by conducting a public hearing and adopting a
resolution of intent to organize. After the public hearing the Council took no further
action.
The City has a modified open hauling system in place. This means that residents can
select their own hauler, but the City still has some requirements. Two such
requirements are specific collection days on which neighborhoods can be serviced and
rate structure that has volume -based rates. In 1988, the City started its curbside
recycling program. The City contracts with one company to collect all of the
recyclables placed curbside in the City.
The City Council reviewed the organized collection material again in 1992. In an effort
to educate the public about this issue, a Saturday Mayor's Forum featured
representatives from Ramsey County Solid Waste, NSP, and the City's recycling
contractor, Gopher Recycling in early 1993.
In the spring of 1994, the City Council dir -acted staff to publish information in the
Maplewood in Motion about the different types of garbage collection, the system in
Maplewood compared to the systems in surrounding communities, and rate
comparisons. Residents were encouraged to call or write with their thoughts and
comments about organized collection vs. modified open hauling currently in effect. The
articles were published in the July and August issues of Maplewood in Motion
Copies of those two articles are attached to this report. The responses were quite
p q
evenly split. Twenty -seven residents called in favor of organized collection. The
reasons they gave were: 1) lower rates; and 2) a decrease in the truck traffic on their
streets. Thirty -one residents called or wrote to state their opposition to organized
g
collection. The reasons they stated were: 1) they wanted to have the ability to choose
their hauler; 2) they were satisfied with the hauler they currently had; 3 truck traffic
was not a problem; and 4) haulers should be allowed to make a living without
government interference. Other comments that we noted were that there should be
penalties for people who do not recycle, and our rate structure should be weight -based
rather than volume- based.
If the City decided to study organized collection more seriously, there is a State law
which regulates the proceedings. At least 180 days before implementing an ordinance
of organized collection, the city must adopt a resolution of public notice which
announces its intent to organize. This resolution also invites participation of interested
people including haulers.
At least two weeks later, the City conducts a public hearing and adopts a Resolution of
Intent.
In the 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Intent, the City develops
plans or proposals for organized collection. Licensed haulers must be invited to assist
the City with the plans.
For the 90 days following the planning period, the City discusses arrangements with the
licensed haulers for possible ways that the organized collection will be handled. Then,
before adoption of the ordinance, the City evaluates the collection method considerin
standards that include collection goals, minimizing the displacement of haulers, and
maximizing collection efficiency.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council review the informal survey conducted in the
Maplewood in Motion, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of organized
collection vs. the current modified open hauling system currently used as well as the
cost/benefits of making a change.
TA
Volu 3, Numbe 7 Official City Newsletter
•
•
1
• • •' • • , •I / y •� , .� • 1, . � � ' '
, t •
.410 W;
' • t
•• �. #
00p; also �Opw
..9 k SA
• 1, �.
• � � � � � � — ` - '
t
,I A
ION
Community Development
Recycling - Logo Contest
The City of Maplewood has completed its second annual
recycling logo contest. The winning class was the 5th grade
from Castle Elementary School, taught by Philip Haas. The
winning logo consists of three circular arrows depicting
"Reduce, Reuse, Recycle" surrounding an outline of the City
of Maplewood. The logo is very colorful with red and blue
arrows with Maplewood being green. The logo will be
displayed on Gopher Disposal's recycling trucks for the next
year.
The winning class will be taking a field trip to tour Materials
Recovery Ltd.'s recycling facility in Rosemount and the Mall
of America's recycling center in Bloomington. Materials
Recovery Ltd. is a recycling facility that processes construc-
tion debris and turns it into animal bedding. The recycling
facility at the Mall of America processes all the Mall's refuse.
Following the tours the students will be treated to lunch and
rides in Camp Snoopy.
This contest is one part of the City's recycling program to
raise the awareness level of the students and their parents.
Through school programs such as book covers and pencils
promoting recycling, and the logo contest, the City is attempt -
ing to educate our students in the proper way to care for our
water, air and land. The City's goal is that the proper educa-
tion of our children today will increase the current levels of
recycling taking place and ensure good stewardship for years
and years to come.
The contest was open to all fourth and fifth graders, public and
private schools, in the City of Maplewood and School District
622.
Organized Garbage Collection
The purpose of this article is to talk about organized garbage
3. City - operated Garbage Hauling - Under this system, the
collection. Organized collection is a system in which the City
City would own its own trucks and equipment, and the
contracts with one or more refuse collection companies to
collection personnel would be City employees. Larger
handle all of the residential garbage pick -up within the City.
cities such as Minneapolis operate under this type of
The City has studied this issue for a number of years. The
system.
current City Council would like to hear residents' thoughts on
open hauling vs. organized collection.
Organized Garbage Collection
There are four basic types of garbage collection:
4. Organized Collection - This alternative has been
seriously researched by the City in the past. Under this
system, the City establishes the rules for collection days
and rates. In addition, the City contracts with one or more
specific haulers.
1. Open Hauling - This system has no City control or
restrictions. Haulers determine their rates, days of
collection, etc.
2. "Modified Open Hauling" - This is the system that
currently exists in Maplewood. Residents can select their
own hauler, but the City still has some requirements such
as specific days on which they can collect in a certain
neighborhood.
Advantages of Organized Collection
There are several reasons that the City Council has researched
the option of organized collection.
Studies have shown that customers living in areas with
organized collection pay less for the service.
In addition, organized collection would reduce the
number of garbage trucks on City streets. Since only one
company is collecting garbage, one or two trucks per
6
Community Development
week drives into the neighborhoods. This would reduce
traffic, noise and wear & tear on City streets.
Disadvantages of Organized Collection
• The freedom of choosing your garbage collector is lost.
You are serviced by the company that contracts with the
City. The customer still selects which volume rate to use
(30 60 or 90 gal lon ), but the type of container, day of
collection, etc. are predetermined by the City.
• Some garbage haulers would not be able to work in the
City or not be able to expand their customer base unless
the City authorized them to do it.
Public Works
The legal requirements for the City to adopt an organized
collection ordinance are somewhat complicated. If the City
Council decides to officially study organized collection, a
resolution of intent is adopted. The City must involve all
licensed garbage Haulers in the process and conduct a public
hearing. In 1987, the City did adopt a Resolution of Intent and
conducted a public hearing. There was very little public
interest, and no action was taken to change the system.
The City Council wants to know if the residents are
interested in a study of organized collection. Call the City
Manager's office at 770 -4524 with your thoughts or drop
us a note at City Hall, 1830 East County Road B,
Maplewood, MN 55109. Next month's Maplewood in
Motion will have a summary of the garbage collection
systems used in our neighboring cities.
If You Dig, Use Your Telephone
Are you planning to install an underground sprinkler system or
plant a tree? Install a fence or a mailbox post? Before you
use your shovel, use your telephone to call Gopher State One
Call to determine if there are any underground utilities in the
area you will be digging in or excavating.
Who Should Call?
Anyone digging in the State of Minnesota must call GSOC
before they dig if they are using power - equipment. Even
when hand - digging, a person is encouraged to call if he /she is
unfamiliar with the location of underground utilities.
What is Gopher State One Call (GSOC)?
GSOC is the state -wide notification center for excavation for
the State of Minnesota.
How Does GSOC Work?
GSOC takes detailed information from callers who are doing
excavation work, processes it in a computer, and notifies
underground utility operators that may have facilities in the
described work area. These underground utility operators
send out locators to locate and mark the underground utilities
with the appropriate colors.
By law, the underground utility operators have 48 hours to
mark their underground utilities. Underground utility opera-
tors do not have the responsibility to mark any private utilities.
Therefore, care should be exercised any time digging takes
place.
The person who is doing the work is responsible for calling
GSOC. If the homeowner does his or her own excavation
work, the homeowner is responsible for calling GSOC. If the
homeowner hires a contractor to do the work, the contractor is
responsible for calling.
What Does This Service Cost?
There is no cost to homeowners or excavators for the service
that GSOC provides. GSOC is a non - profit organization and
is supported by all the underground utilities in the State of
Minnesota.
When Should a Cali be Made?
A call to GSOC should be made at least 48 hours (excluding
weekends, holidays, and emergencies) prior to the start of the
digging. The GSOC office hours are Monday through Friday,
7 a.m, to 5 p.m.
7
FAA
Volume 3, Number 8 Official City Newsletter August 1994
HELP WANTED!
•
•
1
VOLUNTEER SIREN MONITORS NEEDED!
See page 12 for information
Oreanized Collection - Article #2
This is the second article in a series about organized
collection. The City of Maplewood has a modified open
hauling. system in which residents can choose their
g arbage hauler. The only restrictions the City imposes
are specific days of collection and necessary licensing.
The City does not regulate the actual rate that is charged.
However, the City does require that haulers use a vol-
ume-based fee structure without dictating what those
rates are.
The purpose of this article is to talk about the types of
garbage collection our neighboring cities have.
l
The Cit of St. Paul uses a system very similar to
y
Maplewood's. Each resident contacts the hauler of their
choice for regular garbage collection. The City requires
volume -based fees but does not regulate the actual fee.
Recycling is, handled by the City - through a separate
contract.
forth S t• Paul
The City of North St. Paul has organized collection. The
City negotiates a rate contract with five different haulers
who collect in five different zones of the City. All
haulers collect on the same day. The haulers are respon-
sible to bill their own customers. The City contracts
with a recycling company and a compost collector for
Y g
the curbside collection services.
mite Bear Lak
The City of White Bear Lake has organized collection
and contracts with one hauler to collect garbage and
recyclable materials for the entire City. The City bills all
of the customers.
Little Canada
Little Canada's organized collection program is broken
into four different zones. One hauler collects both the
garbage a and recyclables in one zone. Each hauler bills
its own customers.
Ya d a g is ' gl
1 ts
The City of Vadnais Heights has organized collection
with 8 different zones. Each garbage hauler collects
.both g eneral refuse and recyclables. Each hauler handles
its own billing.
Ro s e vill e
The City of Roseville's garbage and recycling collection
is similar to Maplewood's system. Each resident has a
choice of licensed haulers, and the City contracts with a
recycling company for city -wide curbside pick -up.
Rate
The cities of North St. Paul, White Bear Lake, Little
Canada, and Vadnais Heights have organized collection.
The following monthly rates are for garbage collection
only. Recycling charges are extra.
S�.tX 30 gal
North St. Paul $ 8.85
White Bear Lake 9.13
Little Canada 10.60
Vadnais Heights 10.15
Container Size
60 gal•
90 f!
150 gal.
$10.77
$ 12.69
$ 17.41
10.65
13.32
NA
12.42
13.78
17.50
13.50
15.95
NA
The City Council wants to know if you are interested
in ursuin organized collection. Call the Manager's
p g g
office at 770 - 4524 with your thoughts and comments
or drop us a note at City Hall, 1830 East County
Road B, Maplewood, MN 551090
Manlewood's Government Channel
The City has a g overnment channel on cable TV which operates 24 hours a day. If you have basic cable service, current
C ity p rograms i information and rams can be viewed on Channel 64 (if you have a converter box), or Channel 56 (if you have
g
a cable -ready TV).
Mondays, August Au ust 8 and 22 at. 7 p.m. - City Council Meetings - cable cast live from City Hall.
Thursdays, A 11 and 25 at 7 p.m. - Rebroadcast of the City Council meeting that was conducted on the
.previous Monday **
N OTE: The scheduled time for theplalb of Council meetings has been changed from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m.
If you are interested in a sp ecial viewing of the City Council meetings, contact the City Manager's office. Tapes of th
Y � e
meetings are kept for 30 days.
N 'WA A I
AGENDA N4. G
I MORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
INTRODUCTION
City Manager
Environmental Health Official
organized Garbage Collection
July 29, 1991,
On May 6, 1991, the Council requested that Staff prepare a proposed
plan of action with options for organized collection. I am
assuming for this memo that the Council's request only applies to'
residential collection, This memo does not consider commercial
collection. '
BACKGROUND
In 1987, the City Council formed a citizens solid waste committee
to research options for solid waste. collection, including organized
collection. The committee submitted their report in August of 1987
recommending that the City start organized collection with a
consortium of the then current haulers. The City started the legal
process with a public hearing and a resolution of intent to
organize. After the hearing, the Council decided to continue with
the open hauling system and not take any action on organized
collection. ,There is a history of the City's study on organized
collection on page 60
ALTERNATIYEs
There are four basic types of garbage collection:
1. QRen Hauling - This system has no City control or
restrictions.
2. jjodified_Q2en_,_Raulina - This is the system in Maplewood.
Residents can select their own hauler, but the City still has
some requirements, such as specific days for collection.
30 City4wfterated -Garbogp, HaUlIng - This alternative is probably
. not practical because of the cost to buy trucks and equipment.
49 Qx.aanized..Collegtion - There are at least three ways to do
organized collection.
a. one Did* This is the system the City uses for recycling
pick -ups. The Council would.put the entire City out for
one bid. This would eliminate all but one hauler in the
City. smaller companies maybe . at a disadvantage because
the larger companies may be able to underbid the smaller
3
ones. It would be easier for the City to have to only
deal with one company.
b. Sones e We would divide the City into zones, such as we
have now, and put each of them out..or bids. This
alternative would also eliminate several existing
haulers. The City may have to work with four different
companies. The bidding could result in different prices
in different zones or one hauler underbidding all the
rest.
C . Consortium of 8aulers. The existing haulers in the City
incorporate into a consortium so the City would be
working with one group. The City would negotiate the
price with the consortium. Each member of the consortium
would get the same number of accounts as they had
before. This would be the best method of organized
collection for the City and the haulers.
DISCUSSION
Besides the different types of organized collection, the Council
Faust consider several other issues:
1 .
pXjc versus Organized Collection
The table on page 7 shows that organized collection should
reduce the price of garbage collection by an average of $1 to
$ each month., depending on the volume. When Maplewood
investigated organized collection before, there was a bigger
.price difference. With organized collection, the City would
set a :price through bids or negotiations, Either way, the
price would probably be comparable to the other cities that
now have organized collection.
20 Customer Choice
A disadvantage for organized collection is that customers
could not choose their garbage service. This is important to
many customers.
30 City-Ailling-V2rsus Haule
The City could do the billing along with the recycling charge.
The City could add a service charge to the bills to cover
administrative, costs . The other option is to have the haulers
do the billing. If the City did the billing, we could include
• any unpaid bills on the property taxes.
4. e Garbage Truck versus several
organized collection would reduce the garbage trucks on City
2
streets to one or two each week. This would reduce traffic,
noise and wear on residential streets.
.50 Recvcl ing
The Council could include recycling as part of a contract with
the garbage haulers or - continue using one contractor for
recycling pick-ups. Our present system of using one hauler is
easier for the City to administer than having each hauler do
their own recycling. Recycling pick -ups are more complicated
than garbage pick-ups. our current recycling program is
working well and I recommend that the Council continue this
system.
6. Yard Waste
It is illegal to put yard wastes in the garbage container.
Most garbage. - services offer a separate yard waste pick -up.
The - City should require that any service selected for
organized collection offer a yard waste pick -up service as an
option .
7. Scope
Should organized collection only cover single- dwellings or
should it include all residential uses, such as town homes,
apartments, mobile home parks, etc? If the City goes with
organized collection, we should include as many uses as
possible. Some mobile home and multiple dwelling projects
have a large dumpster for all the units. These dumpsters
require a special truck to pick them up. I recommend that the
Council include all residential uses that have curbside pick-
up. The Council should leave the type of service as an option
for the other uses.
so Carts (Garbage Bins
Some. haulers provide carts and some do not. We would have to
develop a policy or have the problems that North St. Paul had.
We could require that all haulers provide carts as Vadnais
Heights did or go without carts. Many people feel that the
carts are very conveniento if the Council requires carts, the
presidents could choose a 30 -, b0 or 90- gallon container which
would correspond to a volume -based fee
99 jjar__,Cogj2 System
With this system, the City assigns each resident a bar code on
their container. When the hauler picks up the container, a
machine automatically weighs it and feeds the information into
a computer. The resident is billed by weight. A variation of
this method can also be used on recycling bins. This new
3
technology is very expensive and would probably prevent the
City from using it now.
There is a hauler in Stacy that uses this system for their
commercial pick -ups. The City does not have organized
collection.
10.
Even though City Code requires each home to have their garbage
picked up by a hauler, there are some people who do not. They
take the garbage to work, use a neighbor's service or take
their garbage to a collection site. When North St. Paul
started orgai -zed collection they bad many people requesting
exemption from the service. This created a record- keeping
problem. I recommend that the City establish a policy of not
exempting anyone, except vacant houses and homes that are
unoccupied for several months at a time.
11
Initially, the City should expect an overwhelming number of
complaints on everything from residents not liking their new
hauler, not liking carts, wanting the City to exempt them from
the charges, not having a choice of haulers, etc. North St.
Paul went through several weeks of this and Vadnais Heights
had their phone system tied up for two weeks with calls and
complaints. These were major probl eras Maplewood will
probably be worse, if for no other reason than its larger
size. Our public hearing in.1987 drew very little public
interest and I would predict the same for now. The calls
would come when we send out a notification letter to each
resident telling thew they have a new hauler. We should
consider getting a temporary employee to answer a special
"hot -line number" so as not to tie up other City phone 1 ines .
12. I
If the City goes with organized collection, I recommend that
we hire a consultant to set up the program. In Vadnais
Heights, it took one person 1 -112 months working full time to
set up the program. No one in this department has the time to
organize this program.
Attachment 8 explains the legal process that a City must
follow in adopting . organized garbage collection. The law
requires that the City include existing licensed throughout
the process, as we did in 1987. when we held a public hearing
in 1987, there was very little public interest. Vadnais
Heights, which recently organized, had a large turnout for
4
their public hearing. Included as Attachment C are letters
and comments from our licensed hauliers. The basic feeling is
that they would Prefer open hauling, but if the city starts
organized collection, they would want a consortium.
When the solid waste comiaittee recommended going with organized
collection in 1987, there were two primary benefits,: the inclusion
of curbside recycling and a considerably lower garbage collection
cost we now have a curbside recycling program and the cost
savings with organized collection would not be that great.
RECOXXZNDATION
If the Council chooses to pursue organized garbage collection, they
should direct staff to schedule a public hearing
go /memo3.mem (8.2)
Attachments:.
1. History of Study on Organized Collection
2, Comparison of collection rates
3. Metro Waste Rate Survey
4. Legal Aspects of Organized Collection
5. Letter: Gopher Disposal
6. Letter: Woodlake Sanitary
70 Letter: Bellaire Sanitation
5
yisror�r of st�ruv��t� ,tAC�,NU�o L L N*O*
• December 1986: request from Maplewood City Council for committee to study
organized collection as a feasible system for Maplewood to meet State
mandated waste disposal goats and to make a recommendation.
• February-June, 1887: Solid Waste Committee conducted thorough
comprehensive study of organized collection system.
• reviewed Metropolitan Council. reports on Solid Waste Management
• reviewed Ramsey County Master Plan for Solid Waste Management
• reviewed and discussed reports from other metropolitan cities involved in
study or actual operation of organized collection
• met with city managers /administrators from three nearby cities who have
organized collection in place (1 year- 17years at that time)
• viewed video tape of March 1985 LWV panel on organized hauling:
county officials, representatives of various metropolitan cities, hauler
representatives
• met with local haulers to ask their input and hear their ideas/fears
• met with county commissioners regarding waste disposal and source
separation
July, 1987: final report presented to council, recommendation to implement
organized collection in conjunction with recycling and yard waste pick -up.
• November, 1987: Resolution of intent adopted to study organized collection
and recycling.
Early, 1988: City Council took no action for organized collection.
• June., 1988: Curbside recycling program not approved.
• November. 1988: Curbside recycling program approved and established.
t
i
6 Attachment 1
I LOEMLY -MM-
AS
S
CITIES WITH
ORGANIZED CO CTION
Small
Medium
Large
Such as
Such as
Such as
30 .9a112ns 60
gallons
90 ga llons
C
North St. Paul
8.85
12.69
17.41
White Sear Lake
10.50
12 911
14.98
Blaine
10.42
-
18942
Stillwater
14.41
-
18.02
Little Canada
11.35
13.28
14.72
Robbinsdale
9098
13.98
-
Col� ia Heights
110,11
-
14e99
Vadnais Heights
Q
7,�
9
Average
11.13
. 13.57
16069
MAPLEWOOD HAULERS
Bellaire
13.85
16.85
18985
D & D Hauling
14900
15.00
15967
Red Arrow
13.17
-
15.70
Ed's Trucking
13.50
-
16060
Gopher Disposal
14.01
17.8 9
2 0.2 4
Ron' s Sanitation
13.0 0
15000
1700
Waodlake Sanitation Service
14.25
17.75
21.25
Wynne's Rubbish
,21000
1§995
Averages
13,1035
25 , 9 4
17e78
Organized Collection
Averages
21.13
13.57
16.69
SAVINGS $2.22 $2.37 $1.09
7 Attachment 2
J It
Por W9 a&
• 1
TABLE 2
ORGANIZED WASTE COLLECTION RESIDENTIA RATER AM BERTZ 8
IN METROPOLITAN' COKKVNITIE3
Community
Eop../Nouseholds
Blaine
37,482/12.305
1 hauler
City bills
Centerville
1, 39.5/416
1 hauler
Hauler bills
Chaupl
16,24 5/5,
6 haulers
City bills
00
Service and Rates
0*
32 s,
9
Rate A eakdown
5100
7.90
1.75
.
LVQ1. /yk.�
S /tool
Refuse
RecYC Yrde to
Admin,
P ep arks
Unlimited
3 2 a.
9
$19.
11.50
$15.30
7.70
No chg. $1.08
No chg. 1008
$2.26
S .86
Weekly curbside recycling SCORE funds
18.19
14.85
1.75
.70
2.26
046
recycling p $1.21 hh so, � � yard
• No. refuse. Sticker for refuse
@ $1.06
ea. when
needed.
collecti Appliances ! $20 /item.
Unlim ited
Senior
17.36
16.34
9060
9.05
7.20
6.
No ch 9•
0
Meekly curbside recycl�.nq. *Waste
1.72
.75
Nee klY curbside recycling and yard
i hauler
No chg.
.54
abatement fee includes recycling. and
1.35
1.36
1 -
.75
tiraste. Recycling bin at no.charge.
City bills
collection of yard wastes, large items
and appliances. SCORE funds offset
recycling costs.
40 ga.
90
23.70
26.70*
15 .4
18.1
1.30 .30
1.3
6005*
.91
We
We ekly curbside re cycling. if resi-
madw
6
• 3
162
.30
5.87•
10 09
dent recycl twice /moo credit
""`
• 63
•83
pays extra to hauler for collecting
S 5 /�0• Ded uct $ 5 when recycling
credit is granted. SCORE..funds Sol
yard wastes, large items, and
=
of recycling prog.ra Large items and
appliances.
appliances collected at extra charge.
Circle Pines
4,764/1,521
0*
32 s,
9
7.75
10.82
5100
7.90
1.75
. 70
No c h .
Q
.20
W eekly curbside recycling 1st bin p no
1 hauler
64
14906
10.95
1.75
1.75
.70
.70
No chg.
No chg.
.47
66
caarge, add, bins ! $7.50 ea.
/ SCO
funds waste
City bills
96
18.19
14.85
1.75
.70
No ch g
089
yd. and adsi costs.
Res (dent purch. stickers for large
• No. refuse. Sticker for refuse
@ $1.06
ea. when
needed.
items and appliances.
Columb a. Heights
20,039/1.,885
Unlimited
Senior
1708.5
13.74
12052
1.35
1.36
1.72
.75
Nee klY curbside recycling and yard
i hauler
8.64
1.35
1.36
1 -
.75
tiraste. Recycling bin at no.charge.
City bills
Large items and appliances at no extra
charge.
Elk River
c+ 11, 000/3, 000
32 ga.
90
14. 00
17.71
10.25
13.75
2.50
2.50
madw
6
• 3
162
Weekly curbsi recycl Resident
d 3 haulers
""`
• 63
•83
pays extra to hauler for collecting
n City bills
yard wastes, large items, and
=
appliances.
c+
.
w
00
f
Community
Service and
Rates
Rate.. Breakdown
op. /1iouseholds
1_Vol . /w .
S /Mo 1
tie use
r ecycle ,
Y d. waste dm'
R e m
Wayzata
3,938/i,841
0
32 ga.
.70
6.91
11.93•
13,5
i.82
1,82
--- .00
__
9 32
Weekly curbside recycling. *City
1 hauler
64
13. 12
19.80 *
1.82
-- •49
.59
absorbs $ hh
or 6.68 / / mo. fro general
City b - ills
96
20.39
ZT.07*
1.82
.99
-- 1.48
.86
1019
Funds.for refuse collection costs.
County funds mot recycl program.
Yard.vaste left at city site ! $4 /cu.
.
yd. Brush left at city site ! S2 /cu.
yd. Large items and appliances
collected at extra charge.
White Bear Lake
23
30 ga.
60
12.32
13.9.3
9.43
10095
1.82
1.82
-- ,50
57
Weekly curbside recycling, • tto charge
I hauler
City bills
90
senior
16.74
13. 6T
1.82
--- .50
-- 050
.66
081
for first bin, replacement p $5 /ea.
Yard waste at Count site for .90
Y $ /
9 084
7,09
1.82
-" .50
.43
bag (summer), 5. /bag ( spring a
t
fall). Large items and appliances
.,
collected by hauler at extra charge.
White Bear Twnshp,
8,739/3,167
Unl imited
20.72
12.04
7.95* No thg.
.73
•
Weekly curbs de recycling. Waste
1 hauler
abatement fee covers recycling, yard
Hauler bills
waste, large items, and appliance
%o
collection costs.
NOTE: Above contains Information f ro m Jan 1, 1991 updated
Ms. C. Rea y. Each community was contacted by telephone
survey compiled b. city of Columbia Nei
Y Y ghts Recycling Coordinator
Waste Management Advisory
Committee.
for clarification and addi tional
information b Roseville Reside
Y Residential
w.
f
Community
Pop. /Households
Excelsior
2,530/1,226
1 hauler
City bills
Farmington
2,530/1,226
l.hauler
City bills
Hastings
14
1 hauler
City bills
J
0
Hopkins
16,111/ ?,816
amity crews
'City bills
Little Canada
9,119/3,974
4 haulers
Mauler bills
Minneapolis
3 58 , 166/ 164 , 780
City crews and
35 hauler
City bills
North St. Paul
12 257/4 , 417
4 haulers '
Hauler bills
Service. and
Rates
..Rate-Breakdown
Ly_o_1_./wk.
S /Mo.l
Refuse
Pecycle yrd. Waste
Admin.
e a s
90 ga.
Senior
19.91
1 7.15
16.89
14.30
2.00 --
2.00
No
chg.
1.02
Weekly urbside recycling. yclinq. Yard Wastes
--
No
chg.
.85
@ $1.00 /sticker. Large items and
appliances collected at extra charge.
90 ga.
14.86
11.57
No chg, some
No
chg.
1069
Weekly urbside
..recycling* Y y ing. Yard wastes
@ $1100 /sticker. barge items and
appliances collected at extra charge.
Experimenting With weight based rates.
30 ga.
60
14.41
12.20
1150 --
No
chg.
1073
Weekly urbside re ciin .
Y cy q First bin
ga.
Unlimited
18.67
21.85
16.20
19.20
1.50 ---
1.50
No
chg.
097
a no charge, replacement bin $5.60.
--
No
chg.
1.15
Yard wastes @ $1.50 /sticker. Count
Y
no can rate
subsidizes recycling costs. Large
for S rs
items and appliances collected at extra
.
charge.
90 ga.
18.56
17.25
.75 No chg.
No
chg.
.56
Meekl cur bside re Y. 9 'c elin . Season --
weekly yard waste. collect La
items co lected .quarteri y . Appliances
referred to private hauler.
•
30 ga .0
60 t�?
130
1 O.6 0
1.9 5
No
chg.
. 7 5
Weekly ly curbside retychinq subsidized
;
90 ��, �;;
15.2`3
ib f 7
12.42
13.78
1.95 --
1.95 --
No
No
chg.
chg.
986
.94
by County @ $1.50 /hh. Yard wastes
@ $1150 /sticker. Large items col -
150 �. , M
17.50
1.95 --
No
chg.
1.17
lected at extra cost. Appliances
not collected.
94 ga.
24177*
17.25
6.90 No chg.
No
chg.
.62
Bi veekly curbside recyclin 9 . Resident
*Net for 30 days. (City
pays $205/30 day period from General Fund.)
receives $6.90 credit for recycling.
County funds 80% recycling programs.
'
Dins .furnished at n o charge. Yard
Ilt.•
waste, large items, an d appliances
•
30 ga .. , ;
8.85
8.35
No chg.. --
No
chg.
. 50
Twice monthly curbside recycling cl in sub-
90' U
22.69
11.97
No chg. --
No
chg.
.72
sidized by County funds ($4,500 /yr.).
150 _
17.41
16.42
No chg. ---
No
chg.
.99
Yard waste @ $.95 /bag. Large items
and appliances at extra charge.
"''- ■ice will- ow_
Counun
Po Households
Robbinsdale
14,276/6,265
1 hauler
City bills
St. Loui Park
42 170
1 hauler
City bills
Shakopee
12
1 hauler
City bills
Stillwater
13, 282/4, 775
1 hauler
City bills
T'onka Bay
1,487/606
1 hauler
City bills
Vadnais Heights
9,749/3.755
haulers
City bills
1.
f i `• v 1 � 1 �� �/ 1 b{
« a
Service and
Rates
Rate 8 gakdown
LVoI. /wk.
efuse
Pecycle
yrde wast A dmin ,
Ta
---
remarks
30 ga.
60
12. 00*
16.00 **
9.42
13.19
2.02
2.02
-- No chg
9
X56
curbside recycling $6.00 for
__
No chg.
.79
bins. Credits for recycling: $2,Oo*
and $4900 * *. County funds 801
recycling and admin, costs; other funds
froze sticker sales. Large items a
appliances by purchasing stickers.
Yard waste @ $1.00 /bag,
Vnli" ited
non-- recyc,
22.I0
15.69
2.01
1. 76
, 80
,04
Weekly curbside recycling. Bins part
Vnliwted
recycle
y
18.76
15.69
- .19
1,76
X80
�Y O
of total cost, r at n
Weekly P o chg,
eey yard waste collection. county
funds e0% recycl and admin. costs.
Large items and appliances at no extra
charge.
65 ga.
13.68
10,66
2.05
*
015
'.12
Weekly curbs recycling, bins at no
••
charge. *Yard wastes collected curb-
side @ $2.25/4 bags La r ge items by
52.25 coupon, numbe of coupons varies
by item. Appliances collected through
county pt'ogran. ,
Unl
Senior
18.02
14.41
17. 00
13.60
No chg.
No ch No
9
chg.,
q
. O
1 2
Twice monthly curbside recycling.
No chg.
No chg, No
chg,
eel
Count subsidizes
Y recycling p 51.40/hh/
No* Meekly curbside collection of
yard wastes. La items and appli-
ances at no extra charge.
Unlimited
Seni �1
18.00
11.00
15.47
11.70
.75
AS No
ch g
093
W e ekly curbside recycling. nonrecyclers
cant
.75
.85 N
No
chg,
.70
pay $7 /mo extra. New bins and
replacement bin ! 3 ea. .Yard v
S / r aster
•
•
collected weekly at curbside. County
-"
funds 801 recycling in program* cY 9 p o9 Large
•
f te's and appliances at extra charge.
30 qa. , •;�
60 � :� -,.
12,w-49 ,!{
15.79
11.70
14.90
No chg. r �'
-- No
chg.
9
.170:
Beek ly curbside re cyclin - bins a $6.50
90 ���
Senior--
18 -29
17.25
No chg.
No chg,
__
No
-- No
ch 9
chg.
.8 9
1. 04
each. Yard wastes $1.50 /bag . Large
i tems on Clean Sweep Da y e Ap
Y pp
_ _ _.- ___
__ .No ch g.
- -- No
chg .
.50
collected at extra charge.
.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF ORGANIZED COLLECTION
A synopsis of Minnesota State Statute 115A.94 ORGANIZED
TI ON � � O LLE C -
�s as follows.
Definition. "Organized collection" means a system for collecti
y tang
solid waste in which a specified collector, or a member of an
organization of collector '
s, is authorized to collect from a
defined geographic service area or areas some or all of the solid
waste released by generators for collection.
.General Provisions. A city may organize collection as a munici
pal service, o by ordinance, franchise, license negotiated or
bedded contract, or other means, using one or more collectors or
organization of collectors. Organized collection shall not
impair recycling or markets for recycling.
The city shall invite and employ the assistance of P Y inter ested
persons and licensed solid waste collectors in the city when
deve loping and establishing an organized collection system
g Y
operating within the city.
At least 180 days before implementing an ordinance franchise
License, , contract or other .means of organizing. collection the
city, by resolution., shall announce its intent to organize col -
lection and invite participation of interested p ersons, '
, p p , including
licensed solid waste collectors, in planning and establishing
the organized collection system,
The - Resolution of Intent must be adopted after a p ublic hearing,
g,
with the hearing held at least two Weeks after public hot-ice,
During a 90 -day period following the Resolution of Intent, the
City shall develop plans or proposals for organized collection.
During this 90 -day period, the city shall invite and employ the
• Y
ass of ersons licensed as of t '
P he date of resolution.
� � �• � �1'C1�tt !' j
For 90 days after the planning period, the city hall discuss
. Possible o Y
organized collection arrangements,wlth all city licensed
waste collectors who have expressed an-interest. The city shall
then evaluate the proposed collection method in light of at least
.the following standards: achieving the city's collection n goals,
.minimizing displacement of collectors, ensuring participation 0
• g p p o f
all interested parties, and maximizing collection efficiency
Anticompetitive Conduct. A city or organization of waste col -
lectors engaging in anticompetitive conduct when lan and/or
P 9
engaging in organized collection are immune, under this statute
from State law relating to antitrust, restraint of trade unfair
trade practices, and other similar regulations.
12 • 0 Attachment 4
emoto 0
P� i BOX 6
NLWt='0RT MN 55C) �
-
•
, `� - 6 3 77
MAY 23 15
TO MAPLEW►aOD CITY r..*.OLINC: I L MEtll -:: R`*
FIEF ORG ANIZED COLLECTION
I T IS MY UNDEF'STANEt I N0 THEN THE C i TY MAY P C+S'_; I E LY +!ANT T*►w► LO CI [: AT
ORG ANIZED COLLECTION Al "E" WAc; riONE A NUMDEU; 0 7 Y Clah AG +_►. Z 'r Wo1'=
DEC IDED AT THAT TIME TO ZtROF' 1' HE ) '�.'=.LlE: F= t=tr"k' 1 0'.) r;EA'_;i lNs. F I F;' =;T ,
THERE WA' ;tom ME L i 'r I � ;FAT I ON A ; TO TLIE LEGALITY OF NEr OT I AT I N
CONTRACTS RAC:TS. I T WA'=; FIETERM I NED T H ? T I S L_'EL"iAL t'0R A M U P-4 T ►C: I Fl) L I: TY
T O NEGOT IATE WITH A E:t�t 7.IR* ' T !_� .� ► , t �.:• {.i; �1 �LF-:E �, 1 F' '�` { - {C +1:�'�� j T'���" l t_a
Y.:
Soo I N FACT, 1' { -I1- r: E T'. N CI W 1 r, r { _ rl i: i.. v.. +_; i. 1.. 01 3 ► '-IN
THAT THE t-_: i - rY M, 'j' NE ►_;i IT I ATr I! :r T H THE r l t.I0 14AU i �1�� • - . �'+
,.� t..�r T CAUSE . THE :_��-:t= : += +t�lh► R '�'�:_;0lt -1 t.,! ; ;'_; ! i T 1 0t •1E,+C+I JINc'�' � t��At;� E:I :+ A
CH 0 I C E V E h' =; I, r; S E I hJ ► .-: A `_; I► P I E L�t A! A A t_� L. f:* t F l� F E El i r•� CIF t_ H +�+ I +� � T' :; (�'='.
CIL.E► A PROBLEM A I '04:0: ��r +:�(a�a 1 Z � "r► � :+ ALL t: t:. i 11:1 P�! '�'l .E� ;! �'::� CIF EN
tEt NOT LELI THERE 1S ANY '�;x t•)F'L.F; LiyrI , N
THERE DOE:I; EXIST vi mnr"'LE:W+:+C::+I.t A or ' or% Elr41 Er) iLLEC T I f:*) ! 11
THAT ALL HOME =; I N A + I VEN NE I + 1-1P':: +!`:H!_'+: +L+ t'�f�;E '= �f::f' �: I ►:� LI:+ ► :r.� - r�I..;E 'ClA1•lL
►AY. THIS FORM OF ►_ OLLE► :T 1 i ►N I' ; k I ►C ALLY FLE�t'_�
1 P 1 .• 1 t� � • 1 i'
REF E I CI1_t•r ONLY ONE DA y f= Eh 'v EN, U8. l- I k. E s T H I •,f,F �..
AL O ALLO FOR HOME TO �tE.TA I t•J 1 !-}E: I Ft != REEr.!'C+�l � tr C. }-_}1_+ T +_:E:
WHICH MANY PEO PLE = ;EEM TO HOLD E. XTF:EMEL.Y NEAR' AND DE{�R .
FFi+_►t� MY POINT lad= V I E�� -P I F "EF: t�!HAT WE' C'.AL L THE " t:: +}='Eta '_�'�':�`1 "Lt�1 " �1'_;
IT EX i r. -* TODAY, I BEL I t= V&" fF4 i f Ell ALLOW ME TO U
CO MPETITIVE ON THE STF:EET ; TO WORT: Trwt -+ i � ► «t � DET� - { ER i
.. L.0 �L.�_ }::: �. r1r�7:
MORE EFFICIENT MAY
OF ��EF: ;►' I +_: ! i`��� t•1 `r �_:;_►�_ -t E; TO OFFER ELT i'LFZ
S, ERV I CE AT F•t_►'Z� _; I BL.Y A FETTER PR I r*E T} 1C c ir i r! i -i
THAT I F" TIME SY'.-*T�= M I"::; TO C iAN ;L I r'r�'.'�C1(' A ►`1 Ei ;1,, {' 1 r'�T'E1:+ +C't: 1NT r:r1� ' f
AND W 1 LL A' ; Y , N THE t= 'A'C.1' l•;� �F } :: �►'E: { .1r' } �L' l! 1 Ti THE t::: 11'Y .1..+`t }�'�_J
TOGETHER THE BE' =;T ' =;Yf.:. TEM I=' r: =:' +; I 'L.E .
I N CERE L Y
WD
MI CHAEL 0 H I N Z
PRE I DENT, GOPHER It l' =;Pio.) =SAL I NC
13 Attachm 5
Via. 0.1 0 91 10 : 45AM
WOOD KE SANITARY SERVICE, INC. wwwwe w waw. a �.
July 1, . 1991
Mr. Robert Wenger ,
City of Maplewood
1830 last County Road 8
Maplewood Minnesota 55109
Dear Mr. Fenger:
P, lit
POW qrp
Thatc you for allowing us to respond to the issue of organized collection
,
which is be ing discussed in your community . As you are aware, we are ver
much concerned with this issue and the Y
Long term impact it may have on our
region. I understand that the issue is being prompted by concerns that the
volume based fees offered by the haulers of Maplewood, do not. reflect an
adequate incentive for waste reduction and recycling. I would like to
address my co=ents to this issue.
Simply put, our prices are based on averages since we ca
8 =Ot collect and
charge our customers by weight. Prior to the NSP Resource Re cover Facility,
Y,
h aulers paid for disposal by the truck size. If a truck carried 20 ards
.packe that's what the hauler aid at T Y
p g landff�,Z. today, all disposal i s
paid by weighing the load We know that the average we of a set -out in
the me t rop olitan tan area is 0 8
P b pounds. However when you break that down to
weight per can, the pounds per one can increase when a customer ie on a
volume based fee payment program. Customers put more weight in one can than
if they distributed the weight into three separate cans. Therefore the
price differenc between a one can custome and s full serv customer is
not as dramatic as one would assume it should be. Since we are collecti
and setting prices by volume and a in dis oral b
P Y !i p y actual weight, the volume
based pricing we use in the tires is as accurate at ossible in order der f oz the
hauler to recover the costs of disposals
Organized collection will have no impact on this scenario unless the contract
that gets negotiated d not cov the costs of collection. Should that
happen, the small haulers would be out of business and eventually ll haul
In the community would be Y 1 rs
Y i financial trouble as has happened in other
•
communities* North Ste Paul, f example, hurt four haulers enoug that the
dropped out of the system before the S
Y price for collection was able to b
tea-negotiated.
We still feel that organized collection is a short term solution to to te
solid waste managem dile,=as that are not � rm
yet fully understood or
addressed in our policies throughout the metropolitan area.
F anc! Orga opportunity to change and respond to various .. solid waste management
stem
alternatives is limited. Since the s 8
y has not settled down yet end since
14 Attachment b
9813 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE • EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 55347 • (612) 9414174 • FAX; 612 941.0266
FAX: ( 612)
AN f DUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
JUL 01 '91 10 :46AM
Mr. Robert Wenger
City of Maplewood
July 1, 1991
Page 2
P OV2
creativity and competition are important to produce more effective abatement
proSrams we would ask that you not organize your garbage collection.
.Instead, call upon your haulers to help you develop and zanage program
alternatives that. continue to address waste abatement,
We appreciate your consideration in allowing'us to address this issue. We
stand prepared to participate in any fasbiar. that will beat suit the needs of
Maplewood. Thank you.
Sincerely.
Kevin Tritz
District Manager
KRI /kj j
15
Belfat*re Sanitation, Inc.
A Apource 9Zecovery System
6678 75th STREET NORTH
STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 D
(612.) 429 -6766 FAX (612) 653 -0818 2
ROBERT WENGER
CITY OF I.IAPLEjvOOD
1830 E . COUNTY RD . B
MAPLEW OOD , flN 5 510 9
DEAR BOB,
AS PER YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 17- 1991 I V70ULD LI TO EXPRESS
RIY COltiCER S ON ORGA IZED RESIDENTIP.L GARBAGE COLL I
STRONGLY FEEL THA � ORGANIZED COLLEC T I OAN IS NOT THE ON FOART-
OF GARBAGE COLLECTION TO ACH IEV£ LOWER MONTHLY FEES THE RESIDENTS
STILL PAY, HIGHER PART ICIPATION III CURB -SIDE RECYCLING. THESE
SERVICES CAN BE ACCO BLISvL'D THROUGH THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTrwrl
AT A MUCH LESSER COST THAN WITH ANY CITY INVOLVENENT A I HAVE
FOUND IN OTHER COI -U.;U I T IBS .
THE ORGANN I ZED COLLEC I HAVE SEEN IhiPLEMENTED IN VARIOUS
COI MMZI T IES HAS - STOPPBD THE GARBAGE HAULER PROM BEING INNOVATED
IN - CERTAIN ARLAS OF THE SOLID WASTE INDUSTRIES. RESIDENTS
STRO4GLY FEEL THAT CHOOSING THE RLFUSE HAULER TO SERVICE THEIR
WEEKLY NEEDS SHOULD EE 'THEIR CHOICE, A SD WHIEN IT IS CH OSEi` FOR
T HE.1 1 1, IlAN Y WILL BECO. E VERY UPSET � j'r H I CH 11ANBS FOR A BAD
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE; HAULER, RESIDENT AND CITY.
WHAT I THINK V70ULD REALLY 14AKE A DIFFERENCE I N THE CURRENT SYSTEtl
CITY OF I1APLE1 00D HAS NOI; , WOULD BE TN:AT THE HAULERS AND CITY
STAFF «OI:IC TOGETHER ON CONCERN'S THAT BOTH HAVE ,LIKE VOLUi•!E
BASE FEES WAS REDUCTION, CURB -SIDE RECYCLI NG, LET 1 ING FREE
ENTERPRISE WORK OUT THE DIFFERENCES,
I All QUITE INTERESTED IN WORI:ING WITH THE CITY OF IIAPLEVIOOD
TO ACHIEVE SUCH GOALS AND LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU.
SINCERELY,
SUE STANEK
PRESIDENT
BELLAIRE SANITATION, INC.
JUNE 25, 1991
i
16 Attach^nent 7
vva.iva.v v�vv W%.0 vL, I I 1 v 1 1 1 VI IlGly%_ 1 %%JC;IU 11 1IVI VVVI I I I ILO
Tabulation of. Bids /Accepta.nce.of Bids
Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll
Ordering Assessment Roll Hearing
DATE: February 21, 1995
Attached. are the bid tabulations resolutions regarding the proposed assessments
Jorsaid improvement. The low bid was received from T. A. Schifsky at $459,662.43.
The engineer's estimate as bid, was $51.7,000.00.
T. A.. Schifs.ky is a respectable contractor who has worked on a number of city projects
Yp J
previously. Staff recommends the acceptance of T. A. Schifsk 's bid for the preparation
Y p p
of the assessment roll.
in order to .proceed with the project schedule in a timely manner, it is necessary to order
Y rY
the preparation of the assessment roll and the associated hearin g at this time. This will
allow the city the opportunity to fully review the assessments and an appeal requests
Y pP q
prior to awarding the bid. Construction may begin about May 15, 1995, with the current
schedule. Staff recommends the ordering of the assessment roll and hearing.
g
TABULATION OF BIDS'
Pursuant to due call. and notice thereof, a special meeting f the officials desi nated for a bid
g g
opening by the City Council of Maplewood was convened. at 10:a.m., Wednesda Februa 8
Y, February ,
1995. The purpose of this meeting was to receive, open and publicly read aloud bids for
construction' of TH 61 .Frontage Road Improvements, City Project 93 -02.
Present were: Russ Matthys Assista.nt City Engineer
ineer
Bill Priebe - Senior Engineering Technician
Following the reading of the notice of advertisement for bids, the following ids were opened
g p
and read:
Bidder Bid Amount Affidavit EEO Bond ADA
Ashbach Const.. $ X X X X
F.M.:Frattalone $584,755.94 X X X X
Hardrives Inc. $570,000.75 X X X X
Midwest Asphalt Corp. $574,214.12. X X X X
T.A. Schifsky $459,662.43 X X X X
Tower Asphalt, Inc. $597,,827.25 X X X X
Valley Paving, Inc. $556,229.60 x X X X
Pursuant to prior instruction of the council, the city clerk referred the bids received to the city
engineer instructing -him to tabulate same and report with his recommendation at the regular city
Y
council meeting of February 27, 1995.
Meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m.
RESOLUTION FOR AWARD OF BIDS
BE IT, RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MAPLEWOOD,. MINNESOTA,
that the bid of T. A. Schifsky in the amount of $459,662.43 is the lowest responsible bid
for the construction of.TH 61 Frontage Road. Improvements - City ro'ect 93 -42 and the
1 ,
mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to accept the bid of said bidder for
and on behalf of the city.
T 4, ., 4, ..•1 4,.,11
L, ..., ,. A C,.% 14...
RESOLUTION
ORDERING ASSESSMENT ROLL HE
ARING
WHEREAS, the clerk and the engineer have, at the direction of the council,
prepared an assessment roll for the construction of TH 61 Frontage Road
Improvements, City Project 93 -02, and the said assessment is on file in the office of the
city clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL F
MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be on the.27th day f March, 1995, atthe city hall at
Y Y
7:15 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and p lace all
persons owning property affected by such improvement will be. given an opportunity to
g pp Y
be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing . g on the
proposed assessment to be published in the official news pa er, at least twb weeks
pp
prior to the hearing and to mail notices to the owners of all property affected by said
assessment.
3. The notice of hearing shall state the date, time, and lace of hearing, p g�
general nature of the improvement, the area to be assessed, that the proposed
assessment roll is on file with the clerk and that written or oral objections will be
.considered.
e
i
w
sTl
i
Aet i on by' Council
MEMORANDUM
Endorsed.. .
Mod -i fied._
T0: City Manager ]Rea sated...:..
Date
FROM: Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Crack Sealing Pilot Project Evaluation
DATE: February 21 1995
In October of 1994, street maintenance' conducted a crack sealing pilot project.
gp p j
The areas selected were heavy traffic areas, such as Southlawn Drive between Beam
Avenue and County Road D, residential areas such as the Kohlman Overlook area a
. and
the city .hall parking lot. After a recent inspection /evaluation no failures were observed.
c An evaluation of our efforts indicates that this operation, performed b city maintenance
p �p y y
personnel, would cost $.1034 per lineal foot. Cost for contractual services would be
$.40 per lineal foot.. This is based on the assumption that the city would purchase p Y p ase the
needed equipment. The equipment used was rented from MacQueen E quip menu
q p
Company and Spec Materials. The melter unit, which is the, largest expenditure is now
g
classified as used .and is available at a reduced cost. It is estimated the total cost of
equipment would be $35,000 to $36,000. This would include the melter random crack
router, and hot air blower.
we have met with the City of Oakdale to discuss the ossibi.lit of a joint purchase and
p Y p
use agreement for this equipment. After #his meeting, he Oakdale City Council
authorized an $18,0,00 expenditure, for 1995, to jointly urchase the equipment. In
p
conclusion, staff requests authorization to formulate a purchase urchase and use
agreement, with the City of Oakdale, and a budget adjustment of $18,000 for
Maplewood's share of the equipment cost.
KG H
(Y-13
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Sam Cave, representing Cave & Associates, Limited has previously applied
for a drainage and utility easement vacation and a preliminary plat for ten lots for Cave's English
Street Third Addition.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a preliminary plat for Cave's English Street Third
Addition on August 22, 1994.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a drainage and utility easement vacation on
August 22, 1994, which easement vacation was not to be released until the City approved the
final plat of Cave's English Street Third Addition.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Cave's English Street Third Addition final plat
on December 13, 1994 subject to specified condition.
WHEREAS, the aforementioned final plat of Cave's English Street Third Addition is still
subject to condition with which the applicant has not yet complied.
WHEREAS, the applicant has now requested permission from the City Council to
complete the necessary condition within a specified period of time.
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the public to have the conditions to the Cave's
English Street Third Addition satisfied within a specified period of time.
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the public to obtain settlement and dismissal of
that civil action entitled Ed Cave & Sons, Inc. v. City of Maplewood, Court File No. CX -93 -6321.
WHEREAS, the aforementioned civil action is ready for settlement subject only to this
pending action of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council take the following action:
1. The approval of the Cave's English Street Third Addition final plat on December
13, 1994, is hereby rescinded so as to reinstate the preliminary plat approval for Cave's English
Street Third Addition dated August 22, 19940
2. The preliminary plat approval for Cave's English Street Third Addition is hereby
amended to provide that all outstanding conditions of that preliminary plat approval shall be
satisfied on or before August 22, 19980
30 The vacation of the drainage and utility easement on Lot 6, Block 1, of Cave's
English Street Second Addition shall not be released until such time as the Ci ty approved roved the
final plat of Cave's English Street Third Addition,
The Maplewood City Council adopted this Resolution on the day of
1995.
i
.A,Ct on by, G oUnO i l
V ndo r- a d...�......��..
MEMORANDUM ldod fied�..,,.111
D.te-
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Develop _
SUBJECT: Wetland and Strea Protection Ordinance
DATE:: February 22, 1995
INTRODUCTION
The City Council requested a wetland setback ordinance. I requested the assistance of the Phalen
Chain of Lakes Watershed Committee. They prepared a model ordinance for use by all the cities
in the watershed. I have modified their model ordinance to fit Maplewood. (See the proposed
ordinance on page 2.)
The proposed ordinance would require minimum buffer zones and building setbacks around
wetlands and streams. The ordinance would rohibit an mowin cutting f llin or
p Y g� g dumping
within the buffer zone. The buffer zone width Would vary de pending on the q uality of the
� p � � y
wetland. The Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed Board is currently worki on classi
Yg
and mapping the wetlands in the City. Y � if
There is a growing trend toward challenging government laws that take away property rights to
protect the environment. (See the article on page 32.) The City Attorney has reviewed the
proposed ordinance and can defend it.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the attached ordinance.
word /wetland2.gwo (5.6)
Attachments:
1. ordinance
2. wetland Buffers: A Summary of Infortnation
I Wetland Buffers - --Use; and I fTec:tiveness (Washington State; Study)
4. 'fable of "Twin Cities Buf ler Standards
5. Newpaper Article
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE ABOUT WETLAND AND STREAM PROTECTION
The Maplewood City Council approves the following changes to the Ma lewood
. g g p Code of
Ordinances:
SECTION 1. This section changes the organization of Section 9 -193 by renumbering and
relettering as follows: (I have underlined the additions and crossed out the deletions.)
1 Delete the first sentence and subheading as follows:
2. Reletter and renumber subsections a.—e. according o the system . used in the Cod
g � e.
3. Change subsection "(2) Slopes" as follows and reletter and renumber subsections
ons a. f.
according to the system used in the Code:
aeu, 9- 194,, lc�ncs•
4. Change subsection "(3) Erosion control and soils" as follows and reletter and e
r number
subsections a.--e. according to the system used in the Code:
See. 9 -195. Erosion control and soils. '
5. Change subsection "(5) 'frees" as follows and reletter and renumber subsections a.—
. f.
according to the system used in the Code:
&c. 9 -197. Trees. '
SECTION 2 . This section replaces subsection 4 9 -193 with the following- I h '
() g ( have underlined
the additions and crossed out the deletions.)
Sec. 9496. Wetlands and streams.
(a) Findings and purposes.
(1) Wetlands serve a variety of beneficial functions. Wetlands maintain water qualit . q i y, reduce
flooding and erosion, provide food and habitat for wildlife rovide open ace
p p p and are an
2
integral part of the City's environment. Wetlands are an important physical, educational
ecological, aesthetic, recreational an economic asset to the Cit Y They are critical to the
City's health, safety, and general welfare. Surrounding development may de rade
p Y g ,
pollute, accelerate the aging of or eliminate wetlands. Regulating land use around
wetlands is therefore in the public interest.
(2) Streams are also significant elements o the City's hydrologic system. Streams flow into
wetlands and. lakes, provide food and habitat for wildlife provide open space, and are an
�p p p ,
integral part of the City's environment. Like wetlands streams are an important physical
p pY
educational, ecological, aesthetic, recreational and economic asset. Surrounding
development may degrade, pollute or damage streams and in tun degrade other surface
g � � g
waters downstream. Requiring buffers recognizes that wetland and stream ualit and
q Y
function are related to the surrou nding upland and, therefore, are in the public interest.
(3) Buffers are the land that surround wetlands and streams. They are integral to maintaining
the valuable functions many wetlands perform. Buffers reduce the impacts of surrounding
land use on wetlands and streams by stabilizing soil to revent erosion b storinwater•
p Y
filtering suspended solids, nutrients and harmful substances; and moderating water level
fluctuations during storms. Buffers also provide essential wildlife habitat. Finally buffos
reduce the adverse impacts of human activities on wetlands and streams. Requiring
wetland buffers recognizes that a wetland and stream's quality and function is related to
the surrounding upland.
(4) The purposes of this ordinance are as follows:
a. To preserve the beneficial functions of wetlands and streams by regulating the
surrounding land use.
b. To stabilize the soil around wetlands to prevent storm water erosion.
c. To filter suspended solids, nutrients and harmful substances from reachin g wetlands,
streams and public waters.
d. To reduce human disturbances of wetlands and streams by visually separating
wetlands from yards.
e. To prevent flooding and the costs of re cla iming water quality
f. To protect beneficial plant and wildlife habitat.
g. To educate the public, including appraisers, owners, potential buyers or developers,
to the development limitations of wetlands, streams and associated buffers.
3
(b) Definitions. The following words shall have the following meanings:
Alteration: Any human action which adversely effects a buffer. Alterations i nclude, but are
not limited to, grading, filling, dumping, dredging, draining, cutting, runin topping,
g g g� p g pp g�
clearing, relocating or removing vegetation, applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous
or toxic substance, discharging pollutants except stonnwater, paving, construction. a lication
p � p g� � pp
of gravel or any other human activity that adversely effects the vegetation, hydrology, wildlife
or wildlife habitat. Alteration does not include the following:
g
1. walking, passive recreation, fishing or other similar activities
2. planting that enhances native vegetation
3. the selective clearing or pruning of trees or vegetation which are. dead diseased noxious
weeds or hazards
Average buffer width: The average width of a buffer within a single development, lot or
phase.
Buffer: A stream or wetland buffer.
Clearing: The cutting or removal of vegetation.
Enhancement: An action which increases the functions and values of a wetland, stream or
wetland buffer.
Mitigation: an action that minimizes, rectifies, eliminates or compensates for the alteration
of a buffer, wetland or stream.
Native vegetation: Tree, shrub, grass or other plant species which are indigenous to the
Twin Cities metropolitan area and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally
Y
ccur on the site. Native vegetation does not include noxious weeds.
Ordinary high water mark (OHWM): A mark delineating the highest water level which has
been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape. 'I'lle
p p
ordinary high water mark is commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from
g g
predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial.
Restoration: Returning a wetland, stream or buffer to a condition that is similar to that
before development of the surrounding area.
. Stream: Those areas where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed. A defined
channel or bed is land which clearly contains the constant assa a of water under normal
p g
summer conditions. This definition shall not include drainage swales or ditches that channel
intermittent stormwater runoff.
DI
Stream buffer: Land that is in direct drainage to a stream and within the b '
boundary described
by this ordinance. All buffers shall be measured from the ordinary .denary high water mark as
identified in the field or, if that cannot be determined from the to of the e stream bank.
Variance: A deviation from the standards of this chap that are not specifically
p allowed.
Vegetation: Any organic plant life growing at, below or above the soil surface.
Wetland buffer: Land that is in direct drainage to a wetland within the boundary
ry described
by this ordinance. All buffers shall be measured outward from the wetland edge.
ge •
Wetland classes: the wetland classes used in this section are defined as follow:
(1) Class 1 wetlands: Wetlands assigned the Unique/Outstanding rating in the
q g g ,Ramsey -
Washington Metro Watershed District Wetlands Inventory Class 1
rY� wetlands are
those with conditions and functions most highly suscep tible to human im pacts, are
most unique, have the highest community resource si significance and similar
g
characteristics.
(2) Class 2 wetlands: high value (definition based on Watershed wetlands inventory
results)
(3) Class 3 wetlands: wildlife habitat value
(4) Class 4 wetlands: moderate value impacts
(5) Class 5 wetlands: wetlands assigned the hig hly impacted rating in the R -
g Y P g Ram sey-
Washington Metro Watershed District Wetlands Inventory, Class 5 wet
with �Y� lands are
those with conditions and functions most impacted b human activities with t
. , Y he least
diverse vegetation communities, least community esource significance and sit
Y g similar
characteristics.
For the purposes o this section, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Classification of
3yetlandsand Dee water Habit is
of the United States FWS /OBS - 79/31 Cow
ardin Ct al
1 79 contains the descriptions and hoto ra hs of wetland classes P g p and subclasses..
Wetland easement: A designated area that includes the wetland or buffer where distrubance
from mowing, cutting or similar activities are excluded.
Wetland edge: The line delineating the outer edge of a wetland. This line shall be
established by using the Federal Manual for IdentiNing and.Delineati'np, Jurisdi
Wetlands dated January 10, 1989, and jointly published b the U.S. Environmenta
Y 1 Protection
5
Agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of En i
y rp g neers and the U.S.
Soil Conservation Service. The applicable watershed board must verify
y this line.
Wetla iunetions: The n atural processes pertornled b wetlands, such as lac'
y illtatiiig food
chain production, providing wildlife habitat maintainin the av '
g allability and quality of water
such as purifying water, acting as a recharge and discharge areas for r '
w g groundwater aquifers and
moderating surf ace Water and storm water flows as well as p erforming other '
p €, fUl]c,t1o11S
including, but not limited to those set out in U.S. Arm Corps of En inee '
Y rp g rs regulations at 33
C.F.R. Section 320.4(b)(2)(1988).
Wetlands: Those areas of the City that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water
at a. frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal
p circumstances do
support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions.
Wetlands generally i s and similar areas. nclude swamps, marshes, bogs (Army ..Corps of
Engineers Regulation 33 CFR 328.3 (1988). Where the ve etation
g has been removed or
substantially altered, a wetland shall be determined b y presence the res� or evidence of hydnc or
.
organic soil, as well as oth documentation of the revious existence of wetland '
p nd vegetation
such as aerial photographs.
(c) Applicability.
(l) This section shall apply to .any erson or use that `would alter ter a wetland, .stream or
wetland buffer after
1995 (date of ordinance).
(2) When any provision of any ordinance conflicts with this section '
, t hat which provides
more protection for buffers, wetland sor streams shall apply unless specifically provided
otherwise in this section.
p
(d) General exemptions.
(1) This section shall not apply to the following:
a. Structures in c;xistenc e on the date this ordinance becomes effective. Such structures
may be remodelled, reconstructed or replaced provided that the new construction
does not take up more buffer land than was used before the remodell
reconstruction or replacement.
b. The construction or maintenance of public drainage facilities sedimentation tatlon ponds
or erosion control facilities.
c. The maintenance of public or sernipublic facilities.
d. Public and semipublic streets, utilities or trails, whether built by a public agency or
private developer, shall be subject to this section. The city ouncil ma waive these
Y Y
requirements where there would be a greater public need for the project than to meet
the requirement of this section. In waiving these requirements, the City Council shall
follow the standards in section 9- 196(e). The City - Council shall hold a public
hearing before declaring such a waiver. The City hall notify the property owners
Y Y P P Y
within 350 feet of the buffer at least ten days before the hearing.
e. Where this ordinance would deny all reasonable use of a lot of record. In such case,
any building shall be constructed to maximize the setback from a buffer. Federal,
State or Watershed District rules and re ulations shall apply. Alterations to a buffer
g
shall be the minimum necessary to allow for the reasonable use of the . ro ert
p p Y
Where feasible, the City may require the mitigation of any alteration of a buffer.
f. Where the watershed district has approved a wetland filling permit. The City shall
require mitigation for any distrubed buffer land.
(e) Standards for utility and trail exemptions.
(l) Construction of utilities may only be permitted through buffers where there is no other
practical alternative and the following requirements are met.#
a. Utility corridors shall not be alloNved when a buffer is used by species listed as
endangered or threatened by the federal or state g overnment.
b. Utility corridors, including any allowed maintenance roads, shall be as far from the
wetland or stream as possible.
c. Utility corridor construction and maintenance shall protect the wetland, stream or
buffer and avoid large trees as much as possible. The use of P esticides, herbicides or
other hazardous or toxic substances shall not be allowed.
d. Utility corridors shall be replanted with appropriate native vegetation, except trees,
at pre- construction densities or greater as soon after construction ends as p ossible.
C. Ail additional corridor access for nlaimeIlance shall be provided as illuch as
possible at specific points rather than by parallel roads. If parallel roads are
necessary they shall be of a minimal width, but no greater than fifteen feet.
(2) The City may allow public or private trails in buffers, subject to the following
guidelines:
7
a. The trail shall not be of impervious materials. (An elevated boardwalk shall not be
considered an impervious surface.)
b. Buffers shall be expanded., where possible, equal to the width of the trail corridor.
c. Disturbed land adjacent to the trail shall be replanted after completing the trail.
(f) Variances
(1) The City Council may approve variances to the requirements in this section. Before the
City Council acts on a variance, the Planning Commission shall make a
recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall hold a public hearing
before approving a variance. The City staff shall notify the property owners within 350
feet of the buffer at least ten days before the hearing. The City may require the applicant
to mitigate any buffer alteration.
(2) To approve a variance, the Council must, make the following findings:
a. Strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique
to the property under consideration.
b. The variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
"Undue hardship" as used in granting a variance means the property in question cannot
be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The
plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property, not created by
the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if
reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance.
(g) Wetland or stream easement required. The property owner of any property affected by
this ordinance shall record wetland or stream easements with Ramsey County. The easements
shall cover any wetlands, streams or wetland buffers. These easements shall describe the
boundaries of the buffer and prohibit any building, mowing, cutting, filling or dumping
within the buffer, stream or wetland. Such easements shall be recorded with a final plat, with
deeds from a lot . division or before the City issues a building permit for an effected property. The
applicant shall submit proof that the notice has been filed.
(h) Buffer standards.
(1) An affected property owner shall maintain a buffer. Any planting in a buffer shall be from
native vegetation.
. (2) The alteration of a buffer is prohibited. The City m waive t
y y his requirement where the
watershed district has approved a permit for filling, ll or art of a w
p wetland.
(3) •1'lle IUllowing are the 111inin1um r equired buffer w' ' � , • .
1 1dt11S " aI1Cl bUllCllll�,, ioull(.�at1Ul1
setbacks:
Welland Classes Class I Class 2 Class 3 •
Class 4 Class 5
Average
Streams
buffer width 100 ft. 100 ft. 50 ft.
25 ft. 0 ft.
.Minimum buffer 100 ft. 50 ft.
25 ft. 20 ft. 0 ft.
width
Building foundation 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
loft. 10 ft. *
setback from outer
edge of buffer
^See the definitions of buffer, wetland buffer and stream buffer.
*Setback measured from a wetland or stream bound
( The minimum buffer widths shall apply to all w '
wetlands, including those that are created,
restored, relocated, replaced or enhanced.
(5) The City may require a variable buffer width •
q h to protect valuable adjacent habitat.
(i), Fencing and signs.
(1) Prior to grading or construction snow fenci •
fencing .and erosion control fencing shall be placed
around the borders of buffers. Such fencing must remain in lace until all
. p development
activities that may affect the buffer are completed.
(2) Before starting construction, the bound_ between boundary t een a buffer and adjacent land shall be
identified using permanent signs. These s shall mark the edge g g of the buffer and shall
state there shall be no mowi cutting filling or durn in b e y ond ' g dumping this point.
(3) When platting, the plat must show the wetland boundaries arses as approved by the
Watershed District.
(j) Mitigation and restoration of buffers. Mitigation is required when a
g q buffer has been or
will be altered. A mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City taff for
y their approval. In
reviewing the plan, the City may require the following actions in descendin g order of preference.
•
01
,(1) Minimizing or avoiding the impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action,
such as by using appropriate technology.
(2) Rectllying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the wetland butTer.
(3) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by prevention and maintenance o erations
during the 11' 1' e of the actiolis.
(4) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing or providing substitute buffer land
at up to a one to one ratio.
(5) Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures.
Where the City requires restoration or replacement, the buffer shall be replanted with native
vegetation at a similar density to the amount before alteration.
10
b
,�, - Z �
CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
RAMSEY COUNTY, MD4NESOTA
AN ORDINANCE
CONCERNING WETLAND B. rm_
D RAFT
SECTION 1. Finding& -Purp_ose
(a) The Council finds that wetlands serve a variety of functions that are critical to the
future .health, safety, and general welfare of the land le and natural resource '
PAP
within ithin the
City. Wetlands maintain water uali serve to reduce flooding and erosion
Q ty � g ,act as sources of
food and habitat for a variety of fish and wildlife, provide op en space and are an integral art
of the community's landscape and ecosystem.
� P g P
Existing and potential development within the City poses increasing '
P ty Po g ecological and
economic problems and demands, potentially degrading, polluting, acceleratin the aging
g Po g g g g
eliminating or negatively and irretrieveably altering both the wetlands and their functions. These
functions, if conserved and. maintained, constitute important physical, educational 1
• Po P y � , ecological,
aesthetic, recreational and economic assets for ex�sting and future residents of the community,
y
Further, the Council finds that the vegetated areas that surround wetlands, called
"wetland buffers", are integral to maintaining the valuable functions man wetlands p erform for
y Pe
the community. Buffers reduce the impacts of surrounding development and land use on wetland
soil functions, by stabilizing so to prevent erosion by stormwater, filtering suspended solids
. P
nutrients, and harmful substances; and moderating water level fluctuations during storms.
.`Buffers also provide essential habitat for feeding, roosting, breeding and rearm of young, and
g g g g y g,
cover for safety, movement, and thermal protection for many species of birds and animals.
.Finally, wetland buffers reduce the adverse impacts of human activities on wetland habitat
P s by
blocldng noise and glare, reducing sediment and nutrient input from runoff, and reducing
P � g
disturbance from dumped debris, cut vegetation and trampling, and by providing visual
separation. The maintenance of a buffer around a wetland recognizes that the quality and
i q Y
function of the wetland s related to the upland around it.
The City Council has in its mind the ublic interest in preventing irreparable destruction
of valuable natural resources. Therefore, .P P g P
the purposes of this ordinance are:
A. To preserve the desired functions of wetlands by regulating the use of areas
adjacent to the wetlands to minimize disturbance to them ' and e revent damage
g
from excessive sedimentation, eutrophication, or pollution; to prevent loss of
beneficial aquatic organisms, wildlife, and vegetation or the habitats of the same;
to provide for the protection of surface waters from the danger and costs of
pollution or mismanagement; to secure safety from floods; to reduce the financial
burdens imposed upon the community from floods, erosion problems and
P
reclamation of water quality;
B. Protect unique, fragile, and valuable elements of the environment including
wildlife, rare species, and their habitats;
Co. Mitigate unavoidable impacts to wetland buffer areas by regulating
alterations in and adjacent to buffer areas;
D. Alert and educate members of the public including, but, not limited to appraisers,
owners, potential buyers or developers to the development limitations of wetlands
and wetland buffer areas;
E. And protect the public trust as to wetlands and related natural reosurces.
SECTION 2. Applicability
A. When any provision of any ordinance conflicts with this chapter, that which
provides more protection to the wetland buffer areas shall apply 1 unless
specifically provided otherwise in this chapter; provided, such exce tions shall not
P
conflict with state regulations, such as the state Shoreland Program.
* Be Is there already language in another Maplewood code that would describe permits
or plans that the city would include in the application of this ordinance?
* C. Will city review permits & enforce? Is there already language in the
environmental ordinance to use here? Should this indicate that the ordinance will
apply to city -owned and managed properties as well?
SECTION 3. General Exemptions
rules.
The following are exemptions to the provisions of this ordinance and the administrative
A. Emergencies that threaten the public health, safety and welfare;
B. Structures in existence on the date this . chapter becomes effective and that do not
meet the setback or buffer requirements of this ca ter for wetland buffers may be
P y
remodelled, reconstructed or replaced provided that the new construction or
related activity does not further intrude into the buffer. Provided further,
however, that new construction or related activity connected with an existing
single family residence shall not be considered further intruding into a wetland
buffer so long as the footprint of the sturcture l in within the sensitive area is
Y g
not increased by more than 1000 square feet and no portion of the sturcture is
located closer to wetland than the existin g structure;
C. Normal and routine maintenance of existing County Judicial Ditches;
D. For the following electric, natural gas, cable communications, and telephone
utility- related activities when undertaken pursuant to approved best management
PP g
12
e
practices:
1. Normal and routine maintenance or repair of existing u tility structures or
right -of -way;
2. Relocation of electric facilities lines ui merit or appurtenances, not
eq P PP
including substations, when required by a local governmental a enc
g Y
which approves the new location of the facilities;
3. Relocation of natural gas, cable communications gas and telephone
facilities, lines, pipes, mans, equipment or appurtenances only
when
. Y
required by a local governmental agency which approves the new location
of the facilities;
4. Installation or construction in improved county road right-of-way, nd
y
replacement, operation, repair or alteration of all natural gas, cable
communications and telephone facilities, lines, i s, mains equipment
p Pe � �
and appurtenances.
SECTION 4. Reasonable Use Exception
A. If the application of this ordinance would deny all reasonable use of the property
. P Pe�Y
development may be allowed which is consistent with the general purposes of this
ordinance and the public Interest.
B. In recommending the reasonable use exemption, the city must determine that:
1. Application of this ordinance would deny all reasonable use of the
property; and
2. There is no other reasonable use with less impact on the wetland buffer
area(s); and
3. The proposed development does not pose 'an unreasonable threat to the
public health, safety or welfare on or off the develop . ro sal site•
P P Po
40 Any alteration permitted to the wetland buffer areas shall be the minimum
necessary to allow for reasonable use of the property.
C. Any authorized alteration of a wetland buffer area under this section shall be
subject to conditions established b the City of Maplewood and shall
Y Y P require
mitigation under an approved mitigation plan.
13
D. Except when aplication of this ordinance would deny all reasonable use of the
property, an applicant who seeks an exception from the standards and
requirements of this ordinance shall pursue relief by means of a variance as
provided in _(existing variance ordinance ?.
* E. Probably need some provision for Appeals hers, consistent with other Maplewood
ordinances.
* F. Probably need a section on Requirements for a variance consistent with other
Maplewood ordinances.
SECTION 5. Wetland Buffer Area Maps and Inventories
A. The location of wetland buffers in the City of Maplewood is displayed on maps
in the City Planning Department and at the Ramsey - Washington Metro Watershed
District offices. Wetlands have been inventoried and classified by function and
value, and these inventories are available at the same locations. These maps and
inventories are hereby adopted by reference. The actual presence or absence of
the features defined as wetland buffer areas, as determined by the City of
Maplewood and Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District, shall govern.
B. All -revisions, updates and reprintngs of these maps and inventories shall be
conformed to this ordinance.
SECTION 6. Notice on Title.
A. The owner of any property on which a. development proposal is submitted shall
file for record with Ramsey County a notice approved by the City. Such notice
shall provide notice in the public record of the presence of a wetland buffer area,
the application of this ordinance to the property, and that limitations on actions
in or affecting such buffers may exist.
The applicant shall submit proof that the notice has been filed for record before
the City shall approve any development proposal for such site. The notice shall
run with the land and failure to provide such notice to any purchaser prior to
transferring any interest in the property shall be a violation of this ordinance.
SECTION 7. Temporary marking, permanent survey marking, signs.
A. Temporary marking. Prior to commencing construction activities on a
development proposal site, the applicant shall mark, as required by the City of
14
Maplewood, wetland buffer areas in a highly visible manner, such as construction
barrier fencing, and these areas must remain so marked until all development
proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed.
B. Signs. The boundary between a wetland buffer area and adjacent land shall be
identified using permanent
signs,
SECTION 8. Mitigation
A. "Mitigation" means the use of the following actions that are listed in descending
order of preference:
1. Avoiding the impact all together by not taking a certain action or parts of
an action;
2. Minimizing impact by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and
its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or b taking
g
affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impact;
3. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the affected
sensitive areas.
4. .Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by prevention and
maintenance oeprations during the life of - the actions;
5. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing
substitute sensitive areas and environments;
6. Monitoring the impact and taking appropriate corrective measures.
B. Mitigation measures shall be in place to protect the wetland buffer areas from
alteration occurring on all or portions of the site that are being developed.
C. A mitigation plan shall be required for the design, implementation, maintenance
and monitoring of mitigation. '
*II. DEFINITIONS (definitions for "development proposal ", "public agency ", "variance ",
etc., should be used from existing Maplewood ordinances.)
SECT. 9. Alteration.
"Alteration" means ' any human- induced action which adversely impacts the existing
condition of a wetland buffer area. Alterations include but are not limited to grading, fillip
dredging, draining, cutting, pruning, lambing or topping, clearing, relocating or removing
15
vegetation, applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxin substance, discharging
pollutants except stormwater, paving, construction, application of gravel, modifying for surface
water purposes; and any other human activity that adversely impacts the existing vegetation,
hydrology, wildlife or wildlife habitat. Alteration does not include walking, passive recreation,
fishing or other similar activities.
SECT. 10. Buffer
"Buffer" means a designated area adjacent to and a part of a stream or wetland that is
an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem.
SECT. 11. Clearing
"Clearing" means the cutting or removal of vegetation or other organic plant material by
physical, mechanical, chemical, or other means.
SECT. 12. Enhancement
"Enhancement" means an action which increases the functions and values of a wetland
or wetland buffer area.
SECT. 13. Native Vegetation
"Native vegetations" means vegetation comprised of tree, shrub, grass or other plant
species which are indigenous to the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area and which reasonably could
have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Native vegetation does not include noxious
weeds.
SECT. 14. Restoration
"Restoration" means the actions taken to return a wetland, buffer, or other vegetative
community to a state in which its stability, functions and values approach its state before
settlement of the area as closely as possible.
SECT. 15. Wetlands
"Wetlands" means those areas of the City of Maplewood that are inundated or saturated
by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under
normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in sturated
soil. conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. (Army
Corps of Engineers Regulation 33 CFR 328.3 (1988). Where the vegetation has been removed
or substantially altered, a wetland shall be determined by the prsence or evidence of hydric or
organic soil, as well as other documentation of the previous existence of wetland vegetation such
as aerial photographs.
16
A. Class 1 Wetlands. "Class 1 Wetlands" means wetlands assigned the
Unique /Outstanding rating in the Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District
Wetlands Inventory, 1995. Class 1 wetlands are those with conditions and
functions most highly susceptible to human impacts are most unique have
highest community resource significance, and similar characteristics:
B. Class 2 -High Value(definidon based on Watershed wetlands inventory results).
C. Class 3 - Wildlife Habitat Value
D, Class 4 - Moderate value/impacts
E. Class 5 Wetlands. "Class 5 Wetlands" . means wetlands assigned the
,Highly Impacted rating in the Ramsey - Washington Metro watershed District
Wetlands Inventory, 1995. Class 5 wetlands are those with conditions and
functions most impacted b human activities with least diverse vegetation
Y � g
communities, least community resource significance, and similar characteristics.
For the purposes of this section, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Oauifi n of
Wed gads ds an Deep ater Habitats f the U nited States FWS/ BS -7 /3l ow din et 1 7
contains the cl descriptions and photographs of wetland classes and subclasses.
P basses.
SECT. 16. Variance
* (Use Maplewood's current defuution)
SECT. 17. Vegetation
"Vegetation" means any and all organic plant life growing at, below or above the soil
surface.
SECT. 18. Wetland Edge
"Wetland edge" :means the line delineating the outer edge of a wetland established by
using the Federal Manual for Idenfiffing j2glinggfinz Juri nal Wed dated Janu
14, .19 ,89, and ,jointly published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Fi sh
and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Soil Conservation
Service,
SECT, 19. Wetland Functions
"Wetland Functions" are natural processes performed by wetlands and include functions
which are important in facilitating food chain roduction providing habitat for nesting, P � P g g, g
and resting sites for aquatic, terrestrial or avian species, maintaining the availability nd qualit
Y q Y
17
a
of water such as purifying water, acting as a recharge and discharge areas for groundwater
aquifers and moderating surface water and storm water flows as well as performing other
functions including but not limited to those set out in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulations
at 33 C.F.R.- Section 320.4(b)(2)(198$)0
SECT. 20. WETLAND BUFFER STANDARDS
A. Wetland Buffers. For all development in the City of Maplewood after _(date
ordinance)_, a buffer strip shall be maintained abutting all wetlands. Buffer
strip vegetation shall be established and maintained in accordance to the following
requirements:
1. Plant species shall be selected from native wetland and
upland trees,
shrubs, grasses and other plants to provide wildlife habitat and stormw
ater
cleaning. .
2. The clearing, removal of vegetation i .
g g n the buffer zone is prohibited,
except for selective clearing and rune of individual trees
P g and shrubs
which are dead, diseased, noxious weed or h ds.
3. Where acceptable to ad'acent ro rties ow
� p pe tiers are .encouraged to leave
dead trees and branches, because they are part of the native natural
envrionment and provide necessary habitat to many birds and native
wildlife.
Be Buffer Determination. All buffers are measured from the wetland
edge as marked
in the field.
C. Minimum Requirements. The following uffers are minimum requirements,
equirements.
Ledand e Class I Class. 2 Class 3 fLass 4 Class 5
Average
Buffer Width > 100 ft., 100 ft. 50 ft. 25 ft.
0 ft.
variable
with specific
conditions
Minimum same 50 ft. 25 ft.
20 ft. 0 ft.
Buffer
Setback from 10 ft. • 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
10 ft.
Outer Edge
of Buffer
18
.I
D. Any wetland restored, relocated, replaced or enhanced because se of wetland
alterations should have at least the minimum buffer required for the class ass of the
i nvolved,
nvolved.
E. Buffer Averaging. The C may recommend buffer a '
Ci ty Y raging ii instances where
it will provide additional resource rotecton to wetlands or to v '
P valuable adjacent
upland habitat, or allow for reasonable use of prope as d •
. p Pe y scribed �n Section 4,
provided that the total buffer area on -site contained in the buffer rein i ns the
aw
same.
F. Additional Requirements. The City may r equire 'increased tY y e9. .eased buffer widths as
necessary. to protect wetlands and adjacent uplands, particularly or wetland and
upland • .. y
p areas included in Class I. The additional buffer widths and o her issues
shall be .determined by criteria and set forth in administarative rules and include,
but are not limited to, critical drainage areas local topographic '
g � conditions,
critical fish and wildlife habitat, roundwater recharge '
g g and discharge, the location
of trail or utility corridors, the location of uni ue native vegetation c ' '
.. q communities,
such as remnant prairies and woodlands, ve etation in the buffer
. g area, and
the type and design of proposed development.
G. Survey Markers.. Prior to altering n wetland buffer
g y area on a development
proposal site, the applicant shall mark the buffer area ursuant to Section
p 8.
H. Signs. Prior to approval or issuance of rnuts for master l
Pe pan developments,
planned unit developmets, subdivisions, commercial or residential '
teal building
permits, the common boundary between a wetland or associated buffer an the
adjacent land shall be identified using permanent signs as set out in Section on 8.
SECT.. 21 ALTERATIONS TO WETLAND BUFFERS
A. Utility Construction. Construction of utilities shall be permitted in wetland b uffers
uffers
only when no practical alternative location is available.
B. Sewer Utility. Construction of sewer lines may only be permitted in
. Y Y pe wetland
buffers when the applicant demonstrates it is necessary r g ravity flow an
�u`y g y d meets
the requirement of this section. Joint use of the sewer unlit corridor
. , y or by other
utilities may be allowed
1. Corridors shall not be allowed when the wetland or buffer
is used by
species listed as endangered or threatened b the federal
y .government or
state, or the presence of critical outstanding habitat for those species;
19
2. Corridor alignment, including any. allowed maintenance roads, shall follow
a path beyond adistance from the wetland edge equal to 75 % of the
buffer width;
3. Corridor construction and maintenance shall protect the wetland and buffer
environment., shall be aligned to avoid cutting trees greater than 12 inches
in diameter at breast height when possible, and shall not use pesticides,
herbicides orother hazardous or toxic substances;
40 Corridors shall require an additional, adjacent, undisturbed buffer width
equal to the proposed corridor width, including any allowed maintenance
roads;
5. Corridors shall be revegetated with appropriate native vegetation at pre -
construction densities or greater immediately upon completion of
construction or as soon thereafter as possible and the sewer utility shall
ensure that such vegetation survives;
60 Any additional corridor access for maintenance shall be provided as much
as . possible at specific points rather than by parallel roads. If parallel
roads are necessary they shall be of a minimum width., but no greater than
15 feet; shall be maintained without the use of herbicides, pesticides
orother hazardous or toxic substances; and shall be contiguous to
thelocation of the. utility corridor on the side away from the stream.
C. Trails. Construction of public and private trails may be allowed in wetland
buffers only upon adoption of administrative rules pursuant to the following
guidelines:
1. Trail surface shall not be of impervious materials, except that impervious
public multi - purpose trails dike the Gateway Trail may be allowed if they
meet all other requirements including water quality; and
2. Where trails are provided, buffers shall be expanded, where possible,
equal to the width of the trail corridor including disturbed areas.
SECT. 22 MITIGATION
A. Miti,gation shall be conducted pursuant to Section 9.
B. Standards for Restoration, Enhancement or Replacement of Wetland Buffers.
1. Restoration is required when a wetland or its buffer has ben altered in
violation of this ordinance. The following minimum performance
20
.I
standards shall be met for the restoration of a wetland, provided that if it
can be demonstrated by the. applicant that g reater functional and habitat
values can be obtained, these standards may be modified.
2. The wetland edge and. buffer areas should g s ou d be .replanted with native
vegetation which replicates the original in s ies sizes and densities; and
pec
3. The original functional values should be restored, including water. quality
and habitat functions.
21
~ : WETLAND BU'FF'ERS.:
�., A SUMMARY OF INFORMATION FOR THE PHALEN
WAT PROJECT STEERING COMM E
WHAT ARE WETLAND BUFFERS?
A wetland buffer is a vegetated area that surrounds a wetland and reduces negative im acts to
g P
wetlands from adjacent development.
The needs identified for .wetland buffers are related to the functions that wetlands erfornn.
. P
Wetlands Perform a variety of functions—such as stormwater cleaning and retention and
providing bird, fish and wildlife habitat. Wetland buffers reduce im acts that affect these
functions by stabiliz soil to prevent erosion by stormwater; filtering suspended solids
g P ,
nutrients, and harmful substances; and moderating water level fluctuations during storms.
Buffers also provide essential habitat for feeding, roosting, breedm and re.arin of young and
g g y g
cover for safety, movement, and thermal protection for many species of birds and animals.
Finally, wetland buffers reduce the adverse impacts of human activities on wetland habitats.
Buffers block noise and glare; reduce sediment and nutrient m ut; and r disturbance from
p educe distu
dumped debris, cut vegetation and trampling, and provide visual separat
The maintenance of a buffer around the wetland recognizes that the quality and function of the
wetland is tied to the upland around it. While we may draw lines around "delineate" a
p articular area as a "wetland" or "buffer" for regulation or classification purposes in realit
these areas function together, and have important ties and mterrelationshi s with the surrounding
g
land! area. These relationships, such as the movement of water sediment nutrients and the
activities of animals and people., affect the functions of the wetland, and how well it is able to
fulfill -the services (or functions) we associate with it.
WHAT SIZE OF BUFFER IS NEEDED TO PROTECT DESIRED WETLAND
FUNCTIONS?
Most scientists agree that wetland buffers are essential for wetland rotection. Appropriate
P
buffer widths are based on several variables, includin :
g
• the functions and values of the wetland (such, as stormwater management, habitat value
and its sensitivity to disturbance;
• the characteristics of the buffer (forested, grass, steepness of slope, etc.
Pe
0 types of surrounding land use and ownership, and impacts on the wetland and
• desired buffer functions.
In general, buffer effectiveness increases with buffer width. As buffer width increases the
effectiveness of removing sediments, nutrients, and other pollutants from surface water
Po runoff
increases. As buffer width increases, direct human impacts, such as dumped ebris cutting
� � g
vegetation, etc., decrease. A field study of wetland buffers in Seattle showed that 95 percent
of buffers less than 50 feet wide suffered a direct human impact within the buffer, while onl
y
22
35 percent of buffers wider than 50 suffered direct human imp act. •
p Of the 21 sites examined,
18 had reduced buffer zones within 1 to 8 Y ears of establishment.
G The attached "Summary and Conclusions" item is a good summar •
g rY of current. scientific
i literature and recommendations on buffer widths. This review of '
• scientific literature on
wetland buffers suggests the following buffer widths for rotectin these wetland p g e .and functions:
Stormwater cleaning: 25 or more feet
depends on vegetation, slope,
density and type of -adjacent
land use
Maintenance from human disturbance: 50 to 150 feet
Bird habitat preservation: 50 or more feet
depends on species and t y pe
of use
Protection of threatened, rare or
endangered species: 300 or more feet
depends on species and
type of use
Wetland buffers may incorporate trees shrubs an
Y rp d flowers as well as grass.
ASSESSING WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES IN THE pHAL,FIN CHAIN OF
LAKES WATERSHED
The Ramsey- Washington Metro Watershed District is currently co pleting a field assessment
of. each wetland in the watershed to assign a value based on functions '
g the wetland is performing.
The assessment examines .these values vegetation diversity, ildlife h abitat, abitat, fishery habitat,
flood/stormwater management, water ualit protection, and •
q y P , aesthet�cslrecreatzon,
ed ucation.
Results from the field work and analysis will be available in 1995 and will, be used by the
Watershed District in recommendation policies and manag of wetlands '
• g ands in the District.
Therefore, Watershed District staff suggest that the Phalen Steerin Committee '
g nuttee recommendatsons
to the Maplewood City Council be "interim" recommendations so that they modified
y can be
when more information is available from the District's wetland's field work and plan.
SOME EXAMPLES OF WETLAND BUFFER REQUIREMEENTS IN OTHER URBAN
AREAS
King County fSeattle Washington) Survey of YLefland Reouirements
This recent survey of wetland buffer requirements showed that of 16 states surveyed, 10 required
wetland buffers. (See attached chart) Buffer width requirements are generally eq g rally related to wetland
23
rating systems that relate wetland size to function and value. Of 28 identified cities in
Washington State with wetland protection ordinances, 27 had buffer standards and 20 of these
used rating systems to determine size. Buffer requirements in this survey ranged from 0 - to 300
feet.
King County's ordinances require a 25 to 100 foot wetland buffer, depending on the value
of the wetland. A minimum building setback of 15 feet is required from the edge of the wetland
buffer.
Nfw. Jersey Pinel_ands
Three factors are used to determine wetland buffer width requirements in the New Jersey
Pinelands region- relative wetland quality, potential impact from proposed development, and
the land use zone surrounding the wetland. Requirements are included in the Pinelands
Comprehensive Management Plan.
Standards range from a 50 foot minimum buffer for relatively low value wetlands with low
potential impacts from surrounding development, to 300 feet for highest value wetlands, those
in "Preservation Area Districts or areas with on -site septic systems.
Highest value wetlands are those with undisturbed native vegetation, high water quality, those
that contribute to the maintenance of water quality in the region, those with a variety of habitat
types, those with a high recreation or aesthe is value, or those with resident or breeding
populations of threatened or endangered species,
Impacts from proposed development and land use are assumed to related to densities - -as the
number of development units proposed per acre of upland increases, potential impacts are
assumed to increase.
Other Twin. Citi s„ C mm ni iies
The chart attached indicates some buffer or setback recommendations in Twin Cities
communities.
24
ISSUES TO DISCUSS RELATED, TO CITY OF MAPLEWOOD REQUEST FOR
RECOMMENDATIONS ON WETLAND BUFFERS:
)Vbat criteria or values should the city use to adopt recommendations /ordinances related to
wetland buffers? What information seemed critical to .you among the ideas presented
above? what additional information is needed to help you make a recommendation?
How should the City explain their recommendations to citizens, developers and others?
What 'buffer width(s) should be recommended? For which types of wetlands?
How should buffers be identified and managed to be comfortable and accepted by
surrounding neighbors?
0
25
4
PHATEN WATERSHtD PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE
AGENDA
OCTODER 6 1994
MAPLEWOOD CITY HALL #w.MAPLEWOOD ROOM
1830 E. COUNTY ROAD B, MAPLEWOOD
I. WELCOME AND UPDATE
STRATEGIC P
staff will.present models for or g anization, and fundin
of the Natural Resources Board and project.
Committee discussion and recommendations ( will continue
in November and December as needed.)
III. WETLAND BUFFER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY OF MAPLEWOOD
The Maplewood Cit Plannin staf f have been asked to develop
.recommendations on wetland buffer zone width for the Cit
council and Plannin Commission * The have asked that the
staff and Steerin Committee for the Phalen Project assist
e .
them b revie -availablinformation and developin
su rep . ommendations., Such recommendations could appl
to all areas within the watershed.
Staff will present back on this issue at the October
meetin to be y our discussion. Cliff is workin on this as
.part of his wetlands plan ( to be completed in.mlod-1995 and
has su that the Steerin Committee make interim
recommendations, to the cit to serve until the plan is
completed.
We will be this discussion in October and finish at the
November meeting or refer to a subcommittees Recommendations
will be provided to Maplewood as well as other in the
watershed and Ramse Count
IV. NEXT MEETING Thursda November 3, 1993, 7 p.m.
Barbara Ra Ramse Count Planter, is unable to come to the
October 6 meetin because her own committees are meetin that
ni She will come to the November 3 meetin to update us
on the Count Comprehensive Plan.
QUESTIONS? CALL SHERRI AT 772-79800
26
Qupc�.�t for �c wask�rg sfi�Uc.
fYbvA VGIVV�JD &,10
IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSiONS
• Wetland buffers are essential f r wetlands 2roteg No s cientific study, no government
agency, and no recommendations made during any communications with wetlands
specialists nationwide suggested otherwise.
• Wetland buffers reduce the adversg im acts of adjacent land uses to. w tland Wetland
b uffen -also PrQvide important for wildlife which utilize wettgnd andjiuffer area
for I e ssential lfgneeds Buffers reduce wetland impacts by moderating impacts of
stormwater runoff including stabilizing soil tQ prevent erosion; filtering suspended solids,
nutrients, and harmful or toxic substances; and moderating water leve fluctuations. They
reduce the adverse impacts of human disturbance on wetland habitat including blocking
noise and glare; reducing sedimentation and nutrient input; reducing direct human
disturbance from dumped debris, cut vegetation, and trampling; and providing visual
separation. They also provide essential habitat for wetland - associated species for use in
feeding; roosting; breeding and rearing of young; and cover for safety, mobility and
thermal protection.
'Buff effectiveness increa a with bufferwidth. As buffer width increases, the
effectiveness of removing sediments, nutrients, bacteria, and other pollutants from surface
water runoff increases. However, for incrementally greater sediment removal efficiency
from 90 to 95 %), disproportionately larger buffer width increases are required
(e..g., from 1 to 200 feet).
As buffer width increases, direct human impacts,. such as dumped debris, cut or burned
vegetation, fill areas, and trampled vegetation, will decrease. .
As buffer width increases, the numbers and types of wetland - dependent and wetland-
.related wildlife that can depend on the wetland and buffer for essential life needs
increases.
• A r ri t uff r Lvidths ar d on. four variables: l existing wet land fun i n
v lu and n• ivi t di t r an (2) r racteri land im a t •and
(4) d functions •
• - W g .jlgnds with importanj fMnctions values r wet lands wh i h n5itive t
disturbance will reou.ire greater - buffers to reduce the. risk of disturbance. Wetland
functions, values, and sensitivity are attributes th will influence the necessary level of
protection for a wetland. Those systems which are extremely sensitive or have important
functions will require larger buffers to protect there from disturbances, which may be of
lesser threat to a different site. Where wetland systems are rare or irreplaceable (e.g.,
high quality estuarine wetlands, mature swamps, and bogs) larger buffer widths will
ensure a lower risk of disturbance.
• The uplands immediately adjacent to the wetland vary in their ability to reduce adverse
effects. of development, most importantly in relationship to sloQe and vegetative cover.
Buffers with dense vegetative cover on slopes less than 1596 are most effective for water
27
quality functions. Dense shrub or forested vegetation with steep slopes provide the
greatest protection from direct human disturbance. Appropriate vegetation for wildlife
habitat depends on wildlife species present in the wetland and buffer. Effectiveness is
also influenced by ownership of the buffer.
• Land use associated with signi ficant construgti gnd n t i n imQagts n- d
reater buffers. Construction impacts include erosion and sedimentation, debris disposal,
vegetation removal and noise. Post - construction impacts are variable depending on the
land use, but residential land use, in particular, can have significant impacts. Residential
land use is associated with yard maintenance debris, domestic animal predation, removal
of vegetation and trampling. Wetland areas and their buffers should not be included in
residential lots.
• &prgnriate buff r wid v r in t de ire bUffe fun i n . Temperature
moderation, for example, will require smaller buffer widths than some wildlife habitat or
water quality functions. Buffer widths for wildlife may be generalized, but specific
habitat needs of wildlife species depend on individual habitat requirements.
• Buffer . of less. than 50 feet in width are n r ll in ff iv in prot:gting. we 1 n
Buffers larger than 50 feet are necessary to protect wetlands from an influx of sediment
and nutrients, to protect wetlands from direct human disturbance, to protect sensitive
wildlife species from adverse impacts, and to protect wetlands from the adverse effects of
changes in quantity of water entering the wetland.
• In wg5tem W hin t n w lan Ai im octant 'Wildlife func ion h uld hayg hay 2QQ to
300 -foot buffers a n l.an u .tn._ st m. W in t n w eland with importan
wil lif n ti n hould have I 2 -f tp-ff r n 1 nd v To retain
wetland- dependent wildlife in important wildlife areas, buffers need to retain plant
structure for a minimum of 200 to 300 feet beyond the wetland. This is especially the
case where open water is a component of the wetland or where the wetland has heavy use
by migratory birds or provides feeding for heron. The size needed would depend upon
disturbance from adjacent land use and resources involved. Priority species may need
even larger buffers to prevent their loss due to disturbance or isolation of subpopulations.
B widths eff&ctive in r ventin i nificant water guality tg wgtland5 Ar
g enerally 1 feet rat r . Sensitive wetland systems will require greater distances and
degraded systems with low habitat value will require less.
The literature indicates effective buffer widths for water quality range from 12 to 860 feet
depending on the type of disturbance (e.g., feedlot, silviculture) and the measure of
effectiveness utilized by the author. For those studies which measured effectiveness
according to removal efficiency, findings ranged from SO to 92% removal of specific
pollutants in ranges of 62 to 288 feet. Studies which measured effectiveness according to
environmental indicators, such as levels of benthic invertebrates and salmonid egg
development in the receiving water, generally found that 98 -foot buffers adjacent to
streams were effective. These latter buffer distances may be conservative for wetlands
where lower water velocities and presence of vegetation result in increased sediment
deposition and accumulation.
M
• Buffer frgm to U0 fe t are nee to r tect a wetland . from dire ct human
itur einth frm h man nr hmnt rm Iin d r The
appropriate width to prevent direct human. disturbance depends on the type of vegetation,
the slope, and the adjacent land use. Some wetlands are more sensitive to direct
disturbance than others.
• Some. agencigs. and. many local governmentl rely upon. wetlands rating systemsto
establish tufffgr, widths These rating systems are typically based upon perceived wetland
value and upon acceptable levels of risk to the wetland from adjacent land uses. Of 16
states surveyed, ten require wetland buffers and eight incorporate wetlands rating, either
adopted or proposed. Of five Washington counties, with adopted wetlands protection
ordinances, all five require buffers and four utilize wetlands rating systems (the fifth is
currently proposing an amendment which incorporates rating). Of 28 identified cities
with. wetlands protection ordinances (or interim ordinances), 27 contain specific buffer
standards and. 20 utilize wetlands rating systems. The city without specific standards has
adopted an interim policy statement.
0 Saecific_ buff r ecc uirements .vary widely at the state and local level ft This has resulted in
differing buffer requirements and levels of wetland protection that are not necessarily
effective. For example, the buffer requirements of many agencies are less than those that
are reported in the literature to be effective.
State buffer requirements range from 0. to 300 feet; Washington county buffer
requirements range from 0 to 200 feet; and Washington city buffer requirements range
from 0 to 300 feet.
29
` • 1
TABLE 1
Adopted' Wetland Buffer Standards
STATE Buffer Re_guirem�nt
Rating 5vstem
Buffer Range
California yes
yes
100 feet
Connecticut no
no
none
Delaware yes
yes
0 to 300 feet
Illinois no
no
none
Louisiana no
yes
no ne
Maine _yes
yes
25 to 100 feet
Maryland yes
yes
25 to - 1 00 feet
Michigan no
no
none
Minnesota no
no
none
New .Hampshire yes
no
0 to 100 feet
New Jersey yes
yes
0 to 300 feet
New York yes
no
0 to .100 feet
Pennsylvania yes
yes
300 feet
Oregon no
no
none
Rhode Island yes
no
50 to 100 feet
• Vermon-t yes
yes
0 to 100 feet
• '� _ •AM•�� r_ •�• • •►•• •_••.. M•i• +•+ _. y •�•_•.._f•__ � r•\•..�I••. �.� \r •• r •� = � =•'r. •�••• -�• � � _'1�•.•.•N•M�.y rr ~r - �•� • w�wlra•• _. w�• � .r ��. _•.: ^.►. r
_ w w . • •. .. _• Y i ..- � r � r �•�..• . �` . ti.► . � _. .r �..�. wrr . •. •' _�� r• r� • . .� - •u+,► ♦ vT�• - ��
�`� •,.♦r�•r1� �_ �vr• ._�� .er •r.�••f•i. .• y_ r.� •r. . r �• ...•• �•r � ♦ 4P.r•. Ir
♦ y r+.r.••.-1• ••Y� • . •� r te• •.. ►..- � . •
��.••' ti �+ � .� - . OY.• • •Yt�•••� • .• •�+
�M�,I •rte _. '�• � •r o1n1� ' r . �•. .•,Y•� i�••i� �.•.� � � • ~• � I!•_� • Mrs � .M..�.V� M.�.� �.�.�
�
/••1•w•lu► !�•.._Y� yr1M•� ^ r V•!w �A �. � • ` . r Yr - .R� �. � � �•
••�♦w ,r . „ ♦ � i �.• Imo• �
� �
_ •• w .. •'w_ ♦ • �•'•••_+••• »� • 1�. Mrtil•y r,•.r �� r•�r •.� r = •►• i./_�.1�1� • � .�• • .•I.Y.... I .: �nIF. • M.•r'i A.. � �.• � �•�r -_' �• . � • �• .
-r1• �• r 4r♦ '+_• �� • •• /•�•w•�s ..w• �� • �•••�••� •ti •_• • • . r.•►.. r•� ..�•_ ♦r ••w'r?•i_� ��� • . �• . • •�• � �!. rr....,� •,•r• •••.r r � ��
•,r►L �A w��.wr". 'fir �.r,..�••�+r. � w.. _r •w. r�'..+ - .. ► . iw�r� • ter_. r _. +r► .�.+.r. v M .►. --- �w.•r _. '.�.._.�._...r...�r..�.
., w_. �r.•w►w..•.•• '. r..�•�. , '•+�+� .r..�_ • �r •...► - - . •• ..w �• .. �.� ► :.� :rr .fir ' i,► + . ' 'i .r • r ►• �_.. v►�• ./�+A. +.. •. �•\
�• • •I, • W. w• • �•�'�• M•!1•► Y �. � �.�.• H •a• ~ !•• • r•w . • •�..••�. •.�.••�•• •� � • • �• r i - ��I,• • T•' • w 1/•�1• .• �� Y � M r i • �,I� � .. .�. I•�I•!•�► � S •1... i. • � •w•Ip�.• .1••. !` �•.• r• . _ +•.. �• �• •!.
..�_ '..• '.'.• ••�•�„•r••i•w�r.�`1 • ~��_ •�►••�� ••iii �♦ •••ri• � ` = ~ Ui • T _••••rA +•• .•�+ �•rrr \rw►• �n•.= .`�. +�. r :�•w►►.. ••_�� - � r�� n. �w _� nr•�•`i.�_�� �L••. ••�rr•ri�•��r� .rw.�� `ry •' ••r ••rr♦•�n••
y �y�� •+A••� - .. ••.••\w• . r : = . - • � • .••� . �ir ./.+ •i •� • • � r . 'r ••• � .• . w. � it _r_ �• .. .r: • ._mss � f. ' r *'.r r Y w• ��_...w••I._�• i • �..r_
•� 1• Y•�.�•
am~ •�• � � . • .. .�.•' �_ r= .r•••'_w•w. .•.yr• � • �• �•111i w • _ W �� • .Y. •.•fir � r►
. . +•� • �.•r - =.ice w• �.• �_rru./�r � r.. rr .w. =r wti • • • _.• �•�• � i i ! •• • � .�• ..
_
_ i� =. � = i �• � - �• �, � • •
r... ' • r • • •
_ r y �r � �� , • i_�• • •w• N
_I� ' � •• •••• ~I � � �� •+ • , rr
• r• � w.r • .. A.. •.. •:... - • _ • � wI • �: • •
30
.
xf:
. ........
Se tb
. ........ .
a
7- .... ........
c `s
e
ei
� aneiot=
va.
�a
C
n o
••B11
tL
Bt
=Zon
en
'L1
�i
ou �e
z�v
e
ti
:B
zos
ks • .,
.. ..
r • ed�
s:
�m
ae
ice
d�
0
-�t
e u
: pie
an
d
W "twru Qro� P IN Pr
Plyiaouth_' = 35 feet (structures)
- :xahto�medi:: 75 feet (structures) must provide approved 3 Leet above wetland
...... ... edge ..
100 feet (septic) detailed erosion
....... No etzuctus br within control plan 2 toot above 100 yea3
.. ........ .
......... .. ..
... .. ..... impact zone (SO% Of coneietent with Hx flood level
required /actual construction Site
setback, whichever is Erosion and Sediment `
Control planning
less) `
Handbook
Chanhassen :. 100 foot (pristine) ,
10• feet 3 Lset above ordinary NQ
a0 feet (natural), 40 zietin' 10 -30 high water level
test (ag /u Dan), 0 e►tuz • ee
test (utilized) 0 feett,�
iS0 feet (septic) utilized)
minimum Average xidth
1 o
�a
SO toot (pristine), 20 1i
feet (natural) , 10 CV
rG�`j t�'"✓� t1�CJ� =s (n /uzbaa) , 0
1'1Aµ " to. feet
J l`� ✓ ' test (utilized)
A A W&&n
L9
*umingron 100 Lest tst =uctuzes) 9ba11 be designed to i Loot above 100 year
limit soil lose to not Liood level
core than S tons per
acre per Year
Minnetonka 35 feet (s tructur es) 2 feet above flood
10 f sot (d= ivevayr) level
e st =vctuzrs 2`0 feet 9ignee to mezk ; edq•
map 1evood..:: 20 Le t ( )
of wetland
10 toot (moving,
cutting, etc. )
W4 no I� rA &I A `Y ,
di
no � In � CA- u y
O� aF Y'c�,pvnrNt rtdLj
10 QS GoA •
Y ' + b S
or V W aAW
to !S e
N SJ�tw � L6ti CORV
l b
v�Sf t' D
Y
_ 66 e
rc)
I r --ot N bi
of .
'taework, according to the
aikprly repijrL Oat Superintendent Peter
school board and key ad-
tly frustrated in their
e district's huge bureau -
, Vs -- and make decisions
stn things around at the
wo bad things could hap -
won't. get the support they
d the other is the dis-
-d on page 3B
_. I i
TORX(VA/46 Z 4.,:.
Pro ert, P Y I ghts
m.
ad v.ocates fo
• Y
CU S
_ • AEI• II. L..•.• ♦ _ • //. ,
Public access to
• Y.
d ' wetlan'
.4 -40
t C'
on farm prompts lawsuit
By Greg Gordon "public water wetland" meant
Washington Bureau hunters legally could walk witl
Cornespondent 200 yards of their home, the lnst t
tute for Justice said in a memo
Washington, D.C. its case.
Property -rights crusaders are fo-
cusing on Minnesota for their next The Bronczyks, who have owtled
challenge to government restric - the property since 1926, considir
Irons that are aimed at protecting themselves conservationists and
natural resources but limit uses of are not contesting the decision
privately owned land. - designate it as part of a. wetland,
said Dana Berliner, a lawyer for
A conservative legal center said it the institute Rather, they obyett
would. file a lawsuit today on be - to their - property being declafed
half of John and Josephine Bronc- public water, particularly wheq
zyk, semiretired siblings who abutting Columbus Lake covets
learned in 1990 that the state had only 9 acres of their land, she said.
given the -public legal access to
n^
to
three - quarters of their 160 -acre "The supposed purpose is pro
farm in Anoka County. tect the environment, and alloir-
' ing the public -to roam around nn
The declaration by the Minnesota the Bronczyks' land in no Way
Department of Natural Resources
that their property is part of a Property continued on page 2B . "'
ts sp r research
That was in July 1989. Their theories about the
At to see, flash, along with the image, were published the
next year in the ,journal Science. The report started
single a cascade of research i '
h th t s now beginning to fill
be huge scientific journals with explanations, theories and 3
6 It rufr4ezPq sthmit thew, cl ranoP rwlActial liahtc
By Heron Marquez Estrada _......._ McGraw, who wants Noah to know"
"- • - 'Staff Writer �,� --- . _•_r `"�"' . � about Jackson's zest for life and h'
_ - . L le
� manner of being, , was one of severalr Yi
Sometime n the neat century, • Noah people who eulognzed the 23- year-old p f
,... McGraw well be introduced to Douglas man Sunday during a memorial service
Jackson, a University of Minnesota stu- attended by more than 200 people
r dent who drowned last month while the University Episcopal Center il�i r�fi,
Douglas Jackson's Zraveling in Guatemala. Minneapolis.
friends and family .....,...— .. _
gathered to remember ` Martha McGraw, Noah$s mother and a She told the mourners that when .sheO ",'.
him Sunday. He died in friend of Jackson's, will make the intro- heard .Jackson had died Nov. 28 aflcr i
Guatemala on Nova 28 duction through a journal she's been having completed volunteer work in. a'
when he slipped and fell - keeping for her son, who is two months Nicaragua, she wrote a long note about i.
Into a river he was old.
exploring. . . . .
Memorial continued on page 28 ---
c -e
h P1 za
Igh NOW o rvive
I f t t
b'1!�
• ^, 1
C ub � -?
rn
ay move in bo
all
B y • ♦os an per
occupancy rate to well below h alf
Staff Writer of the available space and a der
fault on its mortgage payment,
At least the Christmas displays are which led to a court- ordered re-
wire wn#..d V avl: ._2 • .
Lords tf8 dive, and to Guatemala to climb His body has not been fou and tic. menus bay tic was awaric of %tic ctan- „u• }nti- ruuticw;iy atduascsaaa:C.
in St. mountains and explore volcanoes, is presumed dead. His family tray- gees Involved in many of the things
me While exploring a river in Guatema- eled to Guatemala shortly after the he dad, but did not let that stop him
a ,
and fell about 200 feet accident to lead a search party. They from living the kind of life he .
Univ� jai he sl ip pe d ..
medlt
reet it
returf I in,
ove.men - is inin
•
cal 'pl ; P Y
ro er
Pf t4 1 4 lB an Oregon case last June. And with by regulating a little bit, then a little Berliner called the case ``the tip of the
men, Ondnued from page
an estimated 500 property- rights bit more and then a little bit more , regulatory iceberg with respect to
a said. groups forming nationwide, the cam- unt
def utrthers that purpose," Berliner
PBn g ot another there's almost nothi , ng left in Minnesota agencies restrictions on
` r her hu � e boost when e way of property rights. property owners. The institute also
19 ,
e property-rights Republicans captured anot . ghts movement has Republi control of protested the .latest • � m8 ulations under
Lorlr ; T
r n gaining momentum since 1992, Congress in the November elections. ; She said that the suit would ask an the Minnesota Wetland Conserve- 1: N
t g gro
t M
' wen the U.S. Supreme Court-ruled a Environmentalists expect Republican Anoka County district fudge to rule Uon Act.
uth Carolina developer was enti lawmakers to tl to.com adopt property -rights Tither that the Bronczyks' property is
i pe i ' w
nsation because a coast laws that will make t more difficult not a public wetland or that they : - The regulat define wetland as an
al onin agency denied him the right to restrict use of land to protect wet have the right to exclude people from area as small as 400 square feet that • .
g their land. may be wet for as few as 14 noncon-
to, build homes on two beachfront lands or-endangered species.
....,, secutive days per year. The regula• ► . l , l;
to %l oper The lower courts awarded the
• Berliner said that the Bronczyks' case In the event the court denies those , tions require property owners who ' l!
2 , d more than S 1 million i �
ca4npcnsation and inter "is a microcosm for what happens in requests, the Bronczyks would re- drain wetlands to create new wet -
ro rt regulation all around the uest compensation, she saic - lands, the institute said. t
P The overnme starts off
The court • issued a similar ruling m co g ,
t
k - le to e s u e.
0 11 st ers V
• •
olf that d e b t ff d
HOTA
j BALLOON
Associated Preis : • tional information about the wolf snared it for killing steers. in bake of G RW An unblase
along with the display, with a book the Woods County, which. •borders Surdyl
! Mill Minn. . on how the taxidermy was done," . The holiday
!Canada. s � �
' �' in 'd Milaca Principal Joan Bradach.
i • A timber wolf blamed for killing s aid P .
• stetts in northern Minnesota is get The Endangered Species Act of 1973
• ti stuffed for display as Milaca John Hlebaen, who runs Trail's )~rid gave. Legal protection to Minnesota H�A1I�oONiNG
Hi Sc oohs new mascot. _ Taxiderm in nearby Rice, Minn., ;wolves, but in 197$ their status: was
gb . b .
hopes to finish the work this week.. ' changed to "threatened" That meant
,•
• nuisance wolves could be killed,: .
• The school changed its nickname this �
'j summer from Indians to Wolves. To "This is :the first wolf I've done," s lvlinncsota has about 1,840 wolves. � NS '
' change the central Hlebaen said. "Basically it's dust like
. help with the cha g , � 474�16 • i r. The taxiderm base and ass case Ire uor Sto
Mtt�nesota school acquired a wolf a coyote or a fox, only a lot b gge Y� gl q
that is being mounted by a local It's easy to work with because its so ; the wolf will be displayed in is ex-
taxidermist and will be placed in the large." pected to cost about $ 1,400, which
hi school lobby. ,
will be paid from the school's activi-
• Hlebaen said the wol came from the ties fund.
Y ``We're going to display some educe• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which
- 23
E
I
T ' 1
V '
`" A 23-year-old: Rice, Minn., man was in Fiedlees } vehicle, Kevin Kurtz, , The accident happened on 105th Av.
y
killed in a two -car accident in Stearns 33, of Maple Lake, were taken to St. in Brockway Township near St. Ste-
' Y County on Saturday, authorities said. Cloud Hospital. A hospital spokes- phen at 3:14 a.m., the Sheriff's De-
said that Kulas and Kurtz merit said.
woman sa d t P� ;
The Stearns County Sheriffs Depart- were in stable condition Sunday and
meet identified him as Frank Wun- that Fiedler had been discharged..
T -5
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Ramsey County Low - Interest .Loan Request
PROJECT: Maplewood Townhouses - Shelter Corporation
LOCATION: Northwest Corner of 1 l th Avenue and Ariel Street
DATE: February 15, 1995
INTRODUCTION
Action by Counoilu
:dorss
Modifie
Ne, eote
Dat
Mr. Garrett Carlson of Shelter Corporation is requesting that the City Council_ approve a
resolution supporting a request for slow- interest loan. The low- interest loan would be federal
money channeled through Ramsey County to the developer. Shelter Corporation is proposing to
develop 31 town houses on the. northwest corner of 11th Avenue and Ariel Street. He is asking
that the City support the County use of HOME/CDBG funds fora $250,000 low- interest loan.
Shelter. Corporation would use the low- interest loan to help lower the project costs..
BACKGROUND
The City has approved two loans and a grant from the County for three other projects:
1. In 1988, the County approved a $252,000 grant for the Village on Woodlynn senior housing
project.
2. On March 22, 1993, the City Council approved a request from the developers of the
Carefree Cottages of Maplewood. The request was to apply to the County for a $648,000
low- interest loan. The developers used this money to buy the land for the project.
3. On December 13, 1993, the City Council approved a request from the owners of the Golden
Star Apartments at 3 15 -3 21 Larpenteur Avenue. This request was to apply to the County for
a $500,000 low- interest loan. The developers used this money to help rehabilitate the
apartments.
On December 19, 1994, the City Council approved changes to the Comprehensive Plan and
zoning map for this project. The zoning changes were from F (farm residential) to R3 (multiple-
family residential) for the northwest corner of 11th Avenue and Ariel Street.
DISCUSSION
County Loan
Ramsey County has changed their process for handling these loans. They now will contract
directly with the developer instead of passing the loan through the City. This will save the City
staff time and costs in processing the loan documents and payments. There would be no cost or
obligation to the City in supporting the County approving this loan.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the resolution on page 5. This resolution supports the County using up to. $250,000 in
HOME /CDBG funds fora, low- interest loan for Shelter Corporation for the Maplewood
Townhouses. This would be for up to 31 town house units on the northwest corner of 11 th
Avenue and Ariel Street.
kr /Sec 11 /shelloan. mem
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Property Line /Zoning Map
1 Loan Resolution
2
Att dmmt 1
' • : •�••.• • . • ,' •• • �. • y • .• • ••• •,, • ' • •
• • • -
• COUNTY • •.
_ ROAD �D
• GALL AVE. »
wool
WOODLYNN . AVE. ob4�FN� BREyNER AVE.
!
ice � C��o 'y 1 • .Sic AVE
19 � o • 2. •
� mo o .
LYDIA a o AVE•
4 ...
..
° Sri . o .; 3 19 W •, :.
3 AVE.< •.
m 160
S'T, ✓ Y v!• c �' STANDRIDGE , 3
W
W '
e zho S o ° 10 ir1APLE
BEAM P"
A VE.
MAPLE VIEW AVE. '�'' : �'• ';'• :•''• ..
19 Q •,►
9
o RADATZ AVE.
CK
• . '.. ; ..
IdN1�hoT o 1
• W
Pon RAM SEY NORT�,I
COUNTY .:. SAINT' PAUL
COURT
W KOHLMAN -•
AVE
zo
W ; ••:,
Z ,
EDGEHILL RD.
DEMONT AVE.
ROOKS AVE. BROOKS
AVE. � EL Ey EN
. •
SEX TANT Z r A
AVE• s�o.on. O �t.•
RVAIS W .
t� GERVAIS AIS AVE.
DVIEW AVE. Z
W
NG DR. Y
D
AVE. CASTLE AVE.
KL 4 ' - % - � d Loki �,•;• .
'� AVE. COPE AVE.
o
C7 �n LARK < AVE. ~!
iii LAURIE •
• •.• RD.
RD.S�h.rwood p LAURIE o RD. C9
z
� W
�
RST AVE. W o v '—�� �•:
--
W CO. ' ••
Y RD.
' E. N O
BURKE AVE. �G� , p<
g & ;
-- o .
a.
�E. 3 M Clem
m n
N u di •�
�• RECD A me
HARRIS AVE.
ROSEWOOD AVE. N. °� `•
ROSEW D RAMSEY COUNTY
•: t
AV. � AVE. S. NURSIN ROUND�D FAIR
LOCATION MAP
3
Attachment 2
Q ♦ �� c 080 SI) .
P'71 r52)1
-,. •� 17 l 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1!6 27 28 29 0
.
A" (z!.) - � „ a” , .. ��• /'ray' 18
EDGEHILL -�
i os
30 fa I ;T
nit
• • ' • - ; �; all/ t' 3 Z 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 •8 7 5 4 3 2 ..,
'_ •r _ _ Q
` , y . � I - = vAG =�►" ter _ p,K YOG 23A
C °
-�: ( t7) 'I W
J L
2 2324 627 2B 2930 16 17 18.19 2021 ;24 25 627 _ 829 0
VAL. •� 0 1 t � .�,. R VALAup. a AVE. �1
vIll ' �06Y34�!
1 u+% _-� -- �7— - "T ry — f0e ;.'
v N BROTHERS
LANDSCAPING 3 2 1 M
'!. uj
' 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24252627 82936
O FFICES t
on t.66.w CD
own
Aw
C573)
OEM= E 3 1
.40
DLO �� ,i • e J 0 w. 24% . P C
M 38 ` N
.......... .......
fy
..
RAI NBOW FOODS !� DENTAL. CLINIC
® :PROPOSED
♦ � � s e �� S►tTE
30 :;
1 gd3
1 • .
•' oc td13S7Z 'Y
Ito.
C -0.0
3 73 22 it
LD
1 `10� 33 S
2482 a . G, 9
7 � ' 33 vi 12 p vi
� 2�
'124x44 2) A
on-am
s
1 � J .60
REDEEMING , r 3S k
LOVE 1 .400.. t7o
CHURCH 7 41 Z N t,
. L
tC� L
r
•
i�
s
• �1
�r
i;
(33�
R2�
P E A.
S NO384
19 0 18
11 TH AVENUE --
ORES - r W0 .�
e r
1 y t
�� f 1
PROPERTY LINE /ZONING MAP
4
4
N
Attachment 3
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ALOW- INTEREST LOAN FROM RAMSEY COUNTY
WHEREAS, the proposed project is known as the Maplewood Townhouses.
WHEREAS, the location of the proposed development is the northwest corner of 11th Avenue
and Ariel Street in Maplewood, Minnesota.
WHEREAS,1VIaplewood wishes to help meet the housing needs of low .and moderate income
citizens.
WHEREAS, these town houses, if the developer builds them, could help meet the housing
needs of low and moderate income citizens.
WHEREAS, the. County approved a grant for the Village on Woodlynn and low- interest loans
for the Carefree Cottages of Maplewood and the Golden Star Apartments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that:
1. The Maplewood City Council supports the County using up to $250,000 in
HOME/CDBG funds for slow- interest loan for Shelter Corporation for the Maplewood
Townhouses. This would be for up to 31 town house units on the northwest corner of
11th Avenue and Ariel Street.
2. The Maplewood City Council directs the developer of this project to sign an agreement
directly with `Ramsey County for using these funds.
The Maplewood City Council passed this resolution on February 27, 1995.
5
S -6
Action by Counoil
MEMORANDUM Endorsed.....
Modified . .
lRejecte
TO: City Manager Date
FRONT: Director of Community Development and Environmental Health Off cal
SUBJECT: Drop -Off Recycling Center
DATE: February 16, 1995
INTRODUCTION
On September 12, 1994, the City Council requested a report on the cost of the recycling center at
the end of the year.
BACKGROUND
When the recycling center first opened in 1987, Bellaire Sanitation provided .free service in
exchange . for the recyclables that had some value. That gradually changed to the point where
hauling and processing the recyclables costs more than they are worth. Until this year, the
recycling center had not cost the City anything except a small amount of staff time. Last .July,
Bellaire requested payment for their services. The Council agreed to a $50 per ton payment. A
separate company is removing the old appliances. They charge the City $7 per unit and $15 per
air conditioner. For 1995, the center will cost about $11,400.
DISCUSSION
Options
The Council should consider the following options:
1. Close the recycling center due to excessive costs, and publicize disposal options for
residents.
This may cause inconvenience and complaints from some residents. However, residents can
dispose of elsewhere all the materials now being brought to the. center. Gopher Recycling
will take cans, paper and small pieces of scrap metal at the curb. J.R.'s Appliance will pick
up appliances at the home for a charge. Residents can take larger pieces of scrap metal to
scrap metal yards or to a transfer station.
2. Close the recycling center, publicize disposal options and have one or more cleanup days.
Having one or more cleanup days would be an alternative to the recycling center. However,
more than one cleanup day would cost the City more money. We estimate that the recycling
center will cost about $1.1,400 each year. This compares to cost of $12,000 -- $15,000 per
event for cleanup days. (See the attached memo on a spring cleanup.) For the same amount,
the City could operate the recycling center all year around.
3.. Continue with the recycling center, but direct staff to put up a sign limiting use to
Maplewood residents and businesses.
Conclusion
The recycling center is popular. When compared to the City's overall recycling costs, $11,400 is
a small percentage. The City spends. about $171,800 each year for curbside recycling pickup. If
we closed the center, people may start putting more materials out on the curb for Gopher
Recycling to pick up. Gopher charges the City $88 a ton compared to the $50 a ton that Bellaire
charges for the recycling center. It is cheaper for the City to have people bring materi als to the
recycling center versus curbside pickup. Since the recycling center is well used, more convenient
than a cleanup day and relatively inexpensive, the City should continue the center.
Non - residents and City businesses are using the recycling center. Previously this did not matter,
since there was no cost to the City. It is. a problem now, since the City must pay to have the
materials removed. The money comes from the recycling charges paid by Maplewood's
residents. Since the City's residents pay .the recycling center costs, the City should prohibit non-
residents and businesses from using the center.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Continue with the recycling center.
B. Direct the staff to put up a sign limiting use to Maplewood residents only.
p:miscell/center.gwo (8.2 recycling center)
Attachment: memo on spring cleanup
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Rem J -1 Addendum -- Spring Clean -up
DATE: March 28, 1994
At the pre- agenda meeting, there were questions about the cost and an additional. site
for a spring clean -up day.
COSTS
We are estimating a cost of $12,000- $15,000, depending on the participation. and
• weather. The cost will vary depending on the number of people who dome. We are
basing this estimate on the clean -up day costs at Shoreview, Vadnais Heights and St.
Paul. St. Paul has aclean -up day in their planning districts. They spend about
$6,000 - $8,000 per district or $12,000 - $16,000 for two districts. Two of St. Paul's
districts are about equivalent to Maplewaod's population.
We are estimating about 450 people or about 5 °10 of our households. We have broken
down the costs as follows:
Labor = 6 people (at time and a half) = $1,250
The disposal and transportation costs for 200 appliances = $4,000
Goodwill truck = $183
The disposal of 500 car and 100 truck -tires = $1.
14 Junk Bins at $500 per bin = $7,000
TOTAL = $13
The question for the Council is whether the City should spend $12,040- $15,000 to
provide free trash removal for 5% of our households.
MULTIPLE saes
We decided on using one site for five reasons:
1. The City would have to pay more employees to work the extra site.
2. The City would have to clean up a non -City Hall site on clean -up day. With the
City Hall site, we can do the chipping and clean -up on Monday at regular pay
rates, rather than time and a half for weekend work.
3. Aldrich Arena was not available..
3
4. There is a risk of damaging someone else's parking lot with the dumpsters. The
dumpsters at City Hall will be on the gravel - storage yard at the Public Works
Building.
5. We. -did not have time to get approval for another site and still '
....get an article ul the
Maplewood in Motion.
PAST ACTION
The Council last considered this issue in 1991. The decided t
They o hold a clean-up day
without a drop -off site.. The Council decided a st a d.ro -off site g p e because of the hi cost and the disposal options already available. I have attached the
previous staff report
and _Council minutes.
go/b- 6:clean- up2.mem (8.,2)
Attachments:
1. 1991 staff report
2. 1991 Council minutes
4
j WWWO 7
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Amendment -- NURP Standards
DATE: January 31, 1995
INTRODUCTION
Action by Counciijoi
Endo rsed, -
Modifi ed...�,
Re jecte d
Date-_
The Metropolitan Council is requiring that the City add a policy on storm water design to the
Comprehensive Plan.
BACKGROUND
On December 19, 1994, the City Council adopted the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP)
standards for storm water pond design. (See the City Engineer's memo starting on page 2.) The
Metropolitan Council wants the City to reference these standards in its Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
.Revise the following policy on page 22 of the Comprehensive Plan: (I have underlined the
additional language.)
The City requires drainage and erosion control plans with new developments. Such plans shall
not increase the rate of runoff and shall prevent erosion. The City .will use the National, Urban
Runoff Program (NURP) standards in the des . Wn of new storm 3ya
. &tr 12onds.
p:compplan/nupr.gwo
Attachment: ) 2 -12 -94 memo from the City Engineer
,v
Attachment I
AGENDA ITEM.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
ineer
SUBJECT: Storm Water Pond Design Standard
DATE: December 12, 1994
In 1,990 the U.S. EPA and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency agreed on a goal of
reducing nonpoint- source pollution to the Minnesota River by 40 percent. The two
agencies set a target date for 1996. To accomplish this goal land use controls and
agricultural practices will have to be changed.
While the Minnesota River is presently the most acute problem, the same nonpoint-
source pollution affects all of the water bodies in the Twin City area. For this reason
the Metropolitan Council has adopted an interim strategy o reduce non point-source
9Y p
pollution in the metropolitan area. In order to comply with this interim strategy, cities
a.re.regu-ired to do a number of things. There are three priorities for the City of
Maplewood.
The first is to adopt a standard that addresses erosion control within the city. The city
has recently adopted a new erosion control ordinance that fully complies with the
Metropolitan Council requirements.
The second action concerns adoption of the shoreland ordinance as required by the
Department of Natural Resources. The City of Maplewood has recently revised its
sh;oreland qrdinance.and the draft is being reviewed at the resent time b the various
p Y
agencies. The city is, again, in full compliance with the Metropolitan Council
requirements in this regard.
The third concern centers around the city's standard for storm water pond design. The
city has no formal policy at the present time. The Metropolitan Council's strategy
indicates the city should use the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standard for
design of new storm water ponds. This design standard is very similar to the
engineering standards that are now employed to review new storm water pond
proposals.
In order to comply with the Metropolitan Council's recommendation and to continue
Maplewood's efforts in controlling nonpoint- source pollution, it is recommended that the
Z
40
Storm Water Pond Design
2
December 12, 1994
city council adopt the National Urban Runoff Program standards for new storm water
pond design. When the city council adopts the new storm water and design standard
P ,
the Metropolitan Council. will be notified that the cit is now in compliance with their
y p
interim strategy to reduce nonpoint- source ollution to metropolitan water bodies.
p p
'c
J
KGH
3
IMP40
.4
im �p
Aoti by, Council
MEMORANDUM ;indors "
Hodifi ed,,,,.„
Rejecte
TO• ~r
Ci Manager r to 01
tY g ,1
��.,
FROM: Ken Roberts, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Moratorium on Adult Entertainment/Sexually-Orie '
Businesses
DATE: February 15, 1995
INTRODUCTION
On November 7, 19.94 the City Council directed the staff to research ossible ways to regulate
p y g
sexually- oriented businesses. The Council mentioned the use of l conditional use permits, zoning,
. p � g,
moratoriums and setback requirements from various uses. as possible ways to regulate these
businesses. Past court actions have said that local governments may only reasonably regulate and
Y Y Y g
not completely prohibit adult entertainment and sexually- oriented businesses. A moratorium
would allow the staff and Council time to stud where and how the c ode y should allow for such
businesses in the City. Any new regulations the City adopts should protect t
ty p p he health, safety and
welfare of all residents and existing businesses in Maplewood. In addition the morator
um
would prevent new adult entertainment and sexually-oriented businesses from opening y pening or
existing ones from expanding until the City passes a new ordinance about these.
BACKGROUND
Maplewood has declared moratoriums in the past. The last moratorium was about the expansion
of clinics. City Staff was reviewing commercial uses and setbacks, including clinics.
DISCUSSION
The purpose of the moratorium is to establish a temporary restriction on adult entertainment and
sexual - oriented uses. Maplewood's zon rdinance does not contemplate or adequately p quately address
the classification of adult entertainment and sexually- oriented uses and other similar uses. The
code is unclear about whether such uses and other similar uses should "
be classified as retail
stores," which the code allows in the BC (business commercial BC -M (business ), commercial
modified), SC (shopping center) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning districts or whether the
City should adopt a new classification or standards for those uses.
A moratorium would give some comfort to residents who are afraid that the adult entertainment
or sexually- oriented businesses may open in Maplewood. The City attorney and I do not see a
problem in adopting a moratorium on these uses for a year. A zoning study like this is time
consuming. One year should give the City time to hire a new Director of Community
Development and the staff and Planning Commission enough time to study and advise the City
Council. The interim ordinance will maintain sound land use planning while the City is studying
and adopting new regulations. We have not received any plans or any type of notification for any
adult entertainment or sexually- oriented businesses.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the interim ordinance on page 3. This ordinance establishes a moratorium on the
expansion, development or opening of adult entertainment and " exuall y - oriented uses until
Tuesday, February 27, 1996.
kr /p :miscell /morator3 .mem
Attachment: Ordinance
2
INTERIM ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE FOR PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF CITY RESIDENTS AND ESTABLISHING A
TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON ADULT ENTERTAINMENT OR SEXUALLY -
ORIENTED USES AND SIMILAR USES WITHIN THE CITY
The Maplewood City Council approves the following interim ordinance:
Section 1. Purpose.
The purpose of this ordinance is to establish a temporary moratorium on adult entertainment or
sexual- oriented uses. Maplewood's zoning ordinance does not contemplate or adequately address
p q y
the classification of adult entertainment and sexually- oriented uses and other similar uses. The
City's zoning ordinance is unclear about whether such uses and other similar uses should be
classified as "retail stores," which are permitted uses in the BC (business commercial), BC -M
(business commercial modified), SC (shopping center) and M -1 (light manufacturing) zoning
districts or whether the City should adopt a new classification or standards for those uses.
Besides the proper zoning classification of such uses, there are several significant planning and
land use issues about the regulation of such uses, including the following:
g
1. The particular zoning districts in which the City should allow such uses as either permitted
or conditional uses.
2. The concentration and density of such uses in the City and its neighborhoods.
3. The effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area.
There is a need for City staff to do a study so the City can adopt a set of comprehensive plans
and land use zoning regulations about such uses. Such a study will address the land use and
zoning issues, including those referenced above. The study also will address the City's licensing
regulations about such uses and the extent to which the licensing regulations require changes to
maintain harmony and consistency between the zoning and licensing regulations.
As such, there is a need for the City Council to adopt an interim ordinance to protect the planning
process and the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City. This also is to ensure that
Maplewood and its citizens keep the benefits of the City's comprehensive plan and zoning
ordinance until the City finishes such a study. There is a need to restrict such uses until the City
finishes such a study and has adopted any changes to the City's zoning and land use regulations.
As such, the Maplewood City Council has directed the staff to do such a study.
Section 2. Restrictions.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.3 5 5, Subdivision 4, permits the adoption of interim zoning
ordinances during the study and planning process. As such pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Section 462.3 5 5, Subdivision 4, Maplewood shall not allow the expansion, opening p g or
establishment of, or accept applications for, adult entertainment or sexual oriented businesses.
Y
The Report of the Attorney General dated June 6, 1989 and studies conducted by the Cities of
Minneapolis, St. Paul and Rochester, have concluded that adult entertainment and sexually-
Y
oriented uses can create adverse impacts. Such impacts can include increased crime rates, lower
property values, increased transiency, neighborhood blight and decreased stability of ownership.
Section 3. Planning and Zoning Study; Moratorium.
The Maplewood City Council authorizes City staff to do a study to decide how the City should
regulate such adult entertainment and sexually- oriented uses, and other similar uses within
Maplewood. This study should include, but is not limited to, the following:
1. The particular zoning districts in which the City should allow such uses as either permitted
uses or conditional uses;
2. The density and concentration of such uses;
3. The effect of such uses on other uses in the surrounding area; and
4. The need, if any, for changes to the licensing regulations about adult entertainment and
sexually- oriented uses and similar uses.
Upon finishing the study, the Planning Commission will review the matter and make
recommendations to the City Council.
As such, Maplewood adopts a moratorium on the expansion, development or establishment of
adult entertainment or sexually- oriented uses and other similar uses pending completion of the
study and the adoption of any changes to the Maplewood City Code (including the zoning
ordinance). The City will not issue a license or a building permit for such uses or for the
expansion of any existing use during the moratorium period. In addition, the City will not
approve any rezonings, conditional use permits, plattings or replattings, or land divisions or
consolidations for such uses during the moratorium period.
For this ordinance, adult entertainment and sexually- oriented uses shall mean all such type uses
described in Chapters 19 and 24 of the Maplewood City Code and all other uses of a similar
nature characterized by an emphasis on, or have substantial or significant portions of their stock
and trade devoted to, the presentation, display, depiction or description of "specified sexual
4
activities" or "specified anatomical areas." Such uses include, without limitation, adult book
stores, adult car washes, adult entertainment facilities, laces with nude dancing, p g� novelty
stores, adult motion picture theaters and adult mini- motion picture theaters.
For purposes of this ordinance, "specified sexual activities" means:
1.
Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, oral copulation, anal intercourse, oral -anal
copulation, bestiality, direct physical stimulation of unclothed enitals . flagellation or
g � g
torture in a sexual relationship, or the use of excretory functions in a sexual relationship,
p
and any of the following sexually- oriented acts or conduct: anilingus, buggery, co ro ha
p p gY
coprophilia, cunnilingus, fellatio, necrophilia, pederasty, pedophilia, piquerism, sapphism,
zooerasty; or
2. Human genitals in the state of sexual stimulation, arousal or tumescence; or
3 . Use of human or animal ejaculation, sodomy, oral copulation, coitus or masturbation; or
4. Fondling or touching of human genitals, pubic region or pubic hair, buttocks or female
breast or breasts; or
5. Situations involving a person or persons, any of whom are nude, clad in undergarments or in
sexually revealing costumes, who are engaged in activities involvin g fl the
torture, fettering, binding or other physical restraint of any such person; or
6. Erotic or lewd touching, fondling or other sexually- oriented contact with an animal by a
human being; or
7. Human excretion, urination, menstruation, vaginal or anal irrigation; or
8. Any combination of the above.
For purposes of this ordinance, "specified anatomical areas" means:
1. Less than completely and opaquely covered human genitals, pubic region or pubic hair,
buttock, anus or female breast or breasts below a point immediately above the to of the
p
areola or any combination of the foregoing; and
2. Human male genitals in a discernible turgid state, even if completely and opaquely covered.
S ection 4. Term.
This ordinance shall be effective until February 27, 1996 or whenever the City Council adopts a
new ordinance on adult entertainment or sexually-oriented uses. The Council may extend this
Y y
term if they decide that they need additional time to study a new ordinance and adopt any
necessary changes to the City's Code or zoning ordinance.
5
Section 5. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall take effect after adoption and publication.
Approved b the Maplewood Cit Council on 51995.
Cl
Maplewood Fire Fighters
Relief Association
February 4, 1995
Mr. Michael McGuire, City Manager
City of Maplewood
1830 E. County Road B
Maplewood, MN 55109
Dear Mr. McGuire:
.r- 9
Aotion br CoUnO
ftciorse
�79oted..�.
Yd ��
We are asking your assistance in bringing to the City Council for review and approval the
following matter concerning the Maplewood Fire Fighters Relief Association.
Proposed By -Law Change
Article I, Section 6 Compensation would be amended as follows:
Section 6: Compensation
Compensation shall be paid to all trustees for services rendered The members at any regular or
special meeting will determine the amount of compensation. Regular attending board members_
shall be reimbursed their expenses as approved by the board
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
J
Edward P. Fitzgerald
President
cc Mr. Craig Waldron
Mr. James Hale
P.O. Box 9053 • North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109
5 ,
AGENDA REPORT
'AGENDA ITEM
.o t i on by
Council
TO: Cit Mana 11ndorsed
Modified,-,
FROM: Cit En
Date
'A(; Pedestrian Over nee
RHRJF(.T TrHrk Hi .
DATE: Februar 22, 1995
A bill is proposed. in the le to re the commissioner of hi to
construct a pedestrian and bic brid over TH 36 in North St. Paul, The brid
would be between the intersections of Mar Street and First Street. The bill further
proposes that the commission apportion the local share of the cost between the cities
of North St. Paul Oakdale, and Maplewood and the Department of Natural Resources.
Presentl there . are full si intersections with pedestrian crosswalks and li
at First Street and Mar Street. These two intersections are onl a q uarter mile
apart. This spacin is t otall y contradictory to an reasonable standard for spacin of
si intersections alon a major hi like Hi 36. The Cit of North St.
Paul, however, has successfull ar that the si and extraordinar access
alon Hi 36 are re q uired for the survival of their cit
Given the likelihood that the si s at First Street and Mar Street will
continue into the future, it unreasonable to make a public expenditure to construct a
pedestrian brid over t he hi It is even more unreasonable to expect the Cit of
Maplewood to participate in the cost of that brid
It is recommended the cit council take a position opposin House Bill 477 because
there is no justification for constructio of a pedestrian brid at the location noted.
KGH
Jc
Attachment
v l
�j
1 A bill for an act
2 relating to highways; requiring the commissioner. of
3 transportation to construct a pedestrian- bicycle
4 overpass on marked trunk highway No. 36 in North St.
5 Paul.
6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
7 Section 1. [TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 OVERPASS.]
8 Subdivision 1. (CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED.] The commissioner
9 of transportation shall, as part of the commissio trunk
10 highway work program for fiscal year 1998, construct an overpass
11 suitable for pedestrians and bicycles over marke trunk highway
12 No. 36 in North St. Paul, to be located between the trunk
13 - highway's intersections with Margaret Street and First Street.
14 The commissioner shall apportion the local share of the costs of
15 the overpass among the cities of North St. Paul, O and
16 Maplewood and the de artment of natural resources. T
17 commissioner shall take all steps necessary to sec federal
18 funding for a portion of the costs of the o verpass.
19 Subd 20 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 36 RECONSTRUCTION, The
20 commissioner need not comply with subdivision 1 if the
•
21 commissioner's trunk highway work plan for fiscal year 1998
22 includes a reconstruction of that part of marked t runk highway
23 No. 36 located in North St. Paul, and the reconstruction
24 includes a pedestrian - bicycle overpass within the city.
1
i
f
• r
j0*_1_1 ) /
Action day. Council*
EndorseA,....•• -•. --
M E M 0 R A N D U M Mod.if.e+-- M aw
�-- --
e,� s et e A
Date
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Clerk
RE: MAPLEWOOD HISTORICAL COMMITTEE
DATE: February 21, 1995
The City has advertised for residents to serve on a Maplewood History Committee.
Several residents are eager to serve. Also, the City has received pictures and
articles concerning New Canada Township and Maplewood. A committee of sorts has
held meetings, but direction on how to proceed is needed.
Once a committee has been established, they can proceed with interviewing long-
time residents, video taping the City and all the changes that are occurring
(such as the Maplewood Retail site at Eleventh and White Bear).
For the past several months, former Mayors of Maplewood have been contacted for
pictures of themselves that can be displayed in the Maplewood Room. As of this
date, all 11 have been contacted and we have 8 pictures. Those former Mayors
have promised pictures.
Initial discussion has revolved around what the goal(s) of the Committee would
be and what the Council wanted from the Committee. Questions which arose were:
1. Does the Council plan to charter the Committee?
2. Will there be a Statement of Purpose or Mission Statement?
3. Is the history" expected to start with the City's incorporation or
prior to that with the earliest inhabitants of the area?
Additional discussion involved what resources are available, what types of
material or information should be gathered and preserved, and how they should be
preserved and /or displayed. Some of the resources mentioned were:
1. State Historical Society
2. Early plat maps
3. County history (years ago, in some areas, there were companies which
went through and did histories for Counties.)
4. Long -time residents (e.g., Ostergren family)
5. Previous research and collections - (e.g., Pete Boulay has published
a book based on research of the Gladstone area, Mary Mahre knows of
material which was assembled at the time of the Gladstone reunion,
etc.)
6. Minutes of early township meetings
7. Old newspapers and clippings
There has also been discussion of whether the history f individual neighborhoods
ghborhoods
might be spotlighted, what financial resources might be available whether -
g ether 3 M
might be willing to participate, what "pitfalls" might be encountered ed in the
process of recording the City's history.
Before anything more can be done, it is requested the Council:
I. Appoint a Committee (following is a list of persons interested)
2. Provide direction as to what Council expects of a Committee
3. Provide space for storage. (A space has been designated in the
basement of the City Hall Addition. It is requested we obtain bids
as to the cost of creating such a room.)
People interested in serving on this Committee:
Pete Boulay
1504
Frost
55109
770
-6698
Al Galbraith
1770
Edward Street
55109
770
-6908
Marilyn Galbraith
1770
Edward Street
55109
770
-6908
Carol Mahre
2095
Prosperity
55109
777
-6463
Mary Mahre
2095
Prosperity
55109
777
-6463
John McNulty
2029
Duluth Street
55109
484
-3858
Ed O'Mara
1786
Maryknoll
55109
777
-6830
Carol Schmalz
1943
E. Kenwood Dr.
55117
297 -2705
Don Wiegert
2119
Duluth Place
55109
484 -4216